T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
56.2 | As The Pigskin Turns | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Another NEW Boston Garden gone | Tue Jan 12 1993 12:58 | 19 |
| 1. Will somebody buy this team?
2. Will somebody coach this team?
3. Will somebody manage this team?
4. Will anybody want to play for this team?
5. Will somebody build a new stadium?
6. Will Billy Bulger let them?
7. Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?
8. Will anybody care if he does?
9. Will anybody notice if he does?
10. Will this team win another game?
|
56.3 | Pats not for sale ... yet | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 12 1993 13:06 | 50 |
| From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Patriots not for sale ... yet
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:38:21 EST
FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- The New England Patriots, coming off a 2-14
season, said Monday they have begun looking for a coach and general
manager, the first steps in an overhaul of the team.
Mike O'Hallaron, the club's vice chairman, said only once those
positions are filled and the direction of the team set will club owner
James Orthwein address plans to sell the franchise.
``When Mr. Orthwein feels comfortable, the Patriots will be for sale,
'' O'Hallaron said at a news conference. ``However, at the present time
no offers are being entertained.''
Orthwein is likely to get the first bid from Fran Murray, a former
owner of 49 percent of the team. Orthwein expects several bids and the
selling price could be about $110 million, although he would not confirm
that figure.
More immediately, Orthwein will interview coaching and general
manager candidates in St. Louis, where he lives. It is not yet clear if
the two positions will be incorporated into one.
Dick MacPherson was fired as coach of the Patriots last Friday, and
General Manager Sam Janovich resigned the next day.
``We will have the right person or persons in place as quickly as
possible, hopefully within the next 10 days,'' O'Hallaron said.
O'Hallaron said Orthwein began receiving offers from local groups as
early as last May, when Orthwein purchased majority interest of the team
from Victor Kiam.
At the time, Orthwein said he would not be the owner ``indefinitely,''
nor would he move the team to another city. Orthwein will serve as
chairman and chief executive officer for a St. Louis franchise if the
NFL awards a team to the city.
``Mr. Orthwein has no intentions of moving the franchise out of New
England,'' O'Hallaron said. ``Jim's goal is to build a winning football
team. I don't know how much longer he'll own the team. But you can be
sure that as long as he does, he feels an obligation to make it as good
as he possibly can. We believe that an NFL franchise must have local
identity to succeed.''
Orthwein is said to have paid $86 million for the team and assumed
another $20 million in obligations. The team reportedly lost $4 million
this past season.
Whoever owns the Patriots must assume a lease with the owners of
Foxboro Stadium that runs through 2006. O'Hallaron said Orthwein hopes a
football stadium/convention center can be built.
``It would not only benefit the Patriots but be helpful in attracting
revenues from conventions and their associated business,'' O'Hallaron
said.
The Patriots, who shared the league's worst record with the Seattle
Seahawks, have the first pick in the April draft.
|
56.4 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Tue Jan 12 1993 13:35 | 28 |
| 1. Will somebody buy this team?
(yes)
2. Will somebody coach this team?
(yes)
3. Will somebody manage this team?
(no that is the coach's job)
4. Will anybody want to play for this team?
(no but the draft still exists)
5. Will somebody build a new stadium?
(aren't the braves building a new stadium ?)
6. Will Billy Bulger let them?
(only if Joe Walton picks em' will buger let em')
7. Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?
(Orthwein Pigstein who cares)
8. Will anybody care if he does?
(see above)
9. Will anybody notice if he does?
10. Will this team win another game?
(only if Dan reeves is at the helm)
|
56.5 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Tue Jan 12 1993 13:44 | 6 |
| Boy with Lou Gorman's Plan in place for the 1993 Red Sox, the Celts
treading water, the Broons preparing for their annual imitation of
the Rangers, and the utter chaos of the Pats, it sure is a good
year to be a Boston fan, eh?
JD
|
56.7 | they're both fools | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Tue Jan 12 1993 15:41 | 1 |
| If the Cards don't hire Ditka, this team better.
|
56.8 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Tue Jan 12 1993 18:28 | 25 |
| 1. Will somebody buy this team?
I'll sell my DEC stock for it...
2. Will somebody coach this team?
Sure, you want to... nah. we'll get Ninj to manage it.
3. Will somebody manage this team?
I did ok with fantasy football, why is this different?
4. Will anybody want to play for this team?
Nah, I'll get Doc to be QB, everyone else will quit (haha)
5. Will somebody build a new stadium?
No, stay down there, just put in seats, to replace the benches.
6. Will Billy Bulger let them?
See 5)
7. Will Mr Orthwein move this team to St. Louis?
Can you say Bud-Weiser?
8. Will anybody care if he does?
You will, that means Lisa goes with them...
9. Will anybody notice if he does?
See 8)
10. Will this team win another game?
Who cares...
Who's left there? Is Lisa Coles the highest ranking position there?
Let her be GM. Get some new uniforms, let the cheerleaders be the
coaches.
|
56.9 | | DEMING::MCKAY | | Wed Jan 13 1993 11:55 | 3 |
| Walt #5 is a classic, I almost spit out my lunch. Send it to the Doc!
Jimbo
|
56.10 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Wed Jan 13 1993 18:36 | 1 |
| Yeah, but am I wrong?
|
56.11 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 20 1993 09:41 | 1 |
| Rumor has it that the Pats have an offer on the table to Bill Parcells.
|
56.12 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Jan 20 1993 09:43 | 3 |
| > Rumor has it that the Pats have an offer on the table to Bill Parcells.
If so, then Orthwein seems to have more gray matter than George Young....
|
56.15 | color me perplexed | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 20 1993 10:17 | 18 |
| Lemme ask a real dumb question.
Why the hail would Orthwein offer the job to Parcells when da franchise
is in disarray, needs to be stabilized and THEN sold to a local buyer.
I woulda thunk that Orthwein woulda hired a_interim type coach for less
bucks(Say a Ryan), stabilize da team, sell it to Fireman,
THEN take off to San Loooie wif an expansion team and THEN offer
Parcells THAT job??
Either that or he offers Parcells the Pats job, and eventually moves
the franchise to San Looie and THEN NE gits an expansion team!!
Am I that far off?
MikeL
|
56.13 | | FDCV06::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Wed Jan 20 1993 10:30 | 3 |
| Parcells has priced him self out and Buddy Ryan is in..
REK
|
56.14 | -1, conjecture or validated proof? | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 20 1993 10:32 | 1 |
|
|
56.16 | | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531 | Wed Jan 20 1993 10:47 | 9 |
| If Orthwein can land Parcells, it may allow him to get more when/if
he sells the team. Ryan and Ditka may have a similar effect, but I
can't see any prospective buyer not wanting Parcells.
I think Orthwein is going to hold on to the team until he gets an
expansion club. If he doesn't get one, blackouts won't be a problem
around here anymore.
Mike
|
56.17 | Get Parcells! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 20 1993 11:18 | 25 |
|
The Pats have to hire a coach, and soon, or they'll be in a lot of
trouble for next year and perhaps longer, and no prospective owner is
going to like that. Given that, I think that Bill Parcells is as
good as anyone to have in place when the franchise is sold. What's the
price of a coach such as Parcells, anyway? Per year, what they paid to
Hugh Millen last year? At absolute worst, Orthwein may have to
subsidize the salary in order to sell the team. Big deal, maybe
another couple million out of $100M+. The guy wants out, and he wants
his expansion franchise. Other than that, what right-minded intelligent
owner is going to object to Parcells (don't say anything, Giants' fans!)?
I think this issue has been completely overrated by the local media,
which loved Dick MacPherson, in spite of his obvious and glaring
shortcomings (including his health, and, yes, age). The question is
simple: do the Patriots ever want to get serious and win, or do they
want to be "entertaining", as in the circus?
Buddy Ryan is another story. He'd be a good candidate to get fired the
minute the ink is dry. If Buddy Ryan is named the head coach of the
Pats, I predict that it will only turn out to be the latest fiasco in a
long history of fiascos for the New England Patriots. Going from
Parcells to Ryan is penthouse to the outhouse, imo.
glenn
|
56.18 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 20 1993 11:30 | 1 |
| Didn't Parcells leave the Giants partly due to health reasons?
|
56.19 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Jan 20 1993 11:49 | 9 |
| > Didn't Parcells leave the Giants partly due to health reasons?
That's been my contention for a while. But he's had his ticker fixed, and
changed his lifestyle a bit. (I thought I'd heard that he had quit
smoking, but I might be wrong).....
'Saw
|
56.20 | | METSNY::francus | George and Dan are GONE! | Wed Jan 20 1993 12:20 | 7 |
|
Parcells left the Giants as much because of burnout as anything else.
Apparently the issue with Parcells and NE is Parcells wants language in
his contract protecting him if the team is sold.
The Crazy Met
|
56.21 | Unconfirmed Report - Parcells is IN | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Wed Jan 20 1993 15:53 | 4 |
| Have an unconfirmed report that Parcells has been named Head
Coach of the Patriots.
JD
|
56.22 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 20 1993 16:49 | 5 |
| Someone in the Patriouts conference says he called the Globe to ask
about the Parcells rumors and was told that the Pats HAVE NOT made an
offer to Parcells.
Seems they're denying their own story.
|
56.23 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 20 1993 16:59 | 14 |
| -1,
Patriouts? I like that Mac. Intentional? TM that baby.
BTW Pats sip.
Was listening to dynamic duo from the FAN ( Mike da mouf and Chris
the Laughin' Hyena) on the way back from a meeting. Thay say neither
Parcells to the Pats or Reeves to the Jints is in da bag.
HAHA if the Pats do land Parcells, those two maroons will be blasting
George "I wanna look like Peter Boyle in Young Frankenstein" Young
all over the place. Po Po Jints, nobody wants ta coach 'em.
MikeL
|
56.24 | I'll TM it if they move to St.Louiee | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 20 1993 17:05 | 3 |
| Freudian Slip, MikeL. I saw it and was gonna correct it, but CAM3 is
so darn slow that I left it. I figured someone would get a kick out of
it.
|
56.26 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 21 1993 09:34 | 27 |
| > Was listening to dynamic duo from the FAN ( Mike da mouf and Chris
> the Laughin' Hyena) on the way back from a meeting. Thay say neither
> Parcells to the Pats or Reeves to the Jints is in da bag.
> HAHA if the Pats do land Parcells, those two maroons will be blasting
> George "I wanna look like Peter Boyle in Young Frankenstein" Young
> all over the place. Po Po Jints, nobody wants ta coach 'em.
Mike Francessa and Chris "The Mad Dog" Russo, are split on the Parcells
issue vis-�-vis the Giants. Mike feels that if Parcells was interested
he could have called Young, but Russo feels not.
They are right (or were as of last night) about stuff being in the bag.
As to them blasting Young if Parcells signs with the Pats, I doubt it.
The fans will be.
Francessa probably put it best the day Handley was fired:
If Young doesn't sign Parcells, and Parcells signs with
someone else and turns that club around, and IF Young
signs someone who spend the next three years with the
Giants wallowing around, then Young will be in jeopardy.....
'Saw
|
56.27 | Parcells as Pats GM Too? | SWLAVC::PUGH | | Thu Jan 21 1993 13:19 | 4 |
| I heard this AM that the Pats are holding a press conference at 11:15 today
(2:15 Eastern) to announce Parcells as coach AND General Mgr.
Doug
|
56.28 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Thu Jan 21 1993 13:41 | 45 |
| > <<< Note 56.13 by FDCV06::KING "The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!" >>>
> Parcells has priced him self out and Buddy Ryan is in..
> REK
Thanks for the scoop! (smiley goes here)
Article 6008 of clari.sports.football:
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.football:6008 clari.local.new_england:884 clari.local.massachusetts:968 clari.sports.top:12286
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!eff!world!uunet!nntp1.radiomail.net!fernwood!looking!clarinews
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.new_england,clari.local.massachusetts,clari.sports.top
Subject: Patriots said to offer coaching job to Parcells
Keywords: football, men's professional
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 16:09:10 PST
Location: new england states, massachusetts
ACategory: sports
Slugword: fbn-parcells
Priority: major
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 163/155; Id: z6751; Sel: xbsf; Adate: 1-20-145pes; V: sked
Approved: [email protected]
Codes: ysfprxb., &sfprma., tbza....
Lines: 15
BOSTON (UPI) -- Bill Parcells, the former coach of the New York
Giants, will be offered the New England Patriots' coaching job, the
Boston Globe reported Wednesday.
The newspaper said club owner James Orthwein and his top aides have
agreed on offering Parcells a lucrative, long-term contract.
Mike Ditka, recently fired as coach of the Chicago Bears, and Buddy
Ryan, former coach of the Philadelphia Eagles, also were interviewed.
Dick MacPherson was fired as coach of the Patriots this month and the
man who fired him, Sam Jankovich, the chief executive officer, resigned
the following day.
The Patriots finished 2-14 this year, tied with Seattle for the NFL's
worst record. New England owns the first pick in the April draft.
Parcells led the Giants to two Super Bowl titles before resigning in
1991. He has worked as a television commentator for NBC the last two
seasons.
|
56.29 | | FDCV07::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Thu Jan 21 1993 15:44 | 4 |
| LIKE I SAID EARLIER... Bill Parcells is the new Coach/GM of the
NE Pats... It was just announced at a press conf. in Boston...
REK
|
56.30 | now watch them move the team | FRETZ::HEISER | real men wear purple | Thu Jan 21 1993 15:51 | 1 |
| any decent coach would need both positions to clean that mess!
|
56.31 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 21 1993 16:04 | 20 |
| This has some VERY interesting implications for George Young.
The WORST scenario that George Young could imagine is that Parcells comes
in, and within two or three years turns the Pats around and takes them
to the Bowl, while the Giants are still rebuilding.
An almost as worse scenario would be if Parcells gets the Pats to the
Bowl, where they meet and beat a Reeves-coached Giants squad.
Either way, the second guessers and NY media will have a field day
with Young, who could have had Parcells but for some pride....
Congrats Bill! Hope you take 'em all the way!!!!!
'Saw
|
56.32 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Thu Jan 21 1993 16:06 | 6 |
| re: .31
Please 'Saw anything but Parcells taking NE to a SB championship. Papers
around here border on the insufferable already. (.5 :-)
The Crazy Met
|
56.33 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 21 1993 16:11 | 21 |
| >Please 'Saw anything but Parcells taking NE to a SB championship. Papers
>around here border on the insufferable already. (.5 :-)
>
>The Crazy Met
I'd love to see it.
He did it with the Giants, who were almost as bad as this year's Pats.
The Giants were 3-12-1, and within three seasons they had won the
Bowl. George Young was the GM, and a case could be made that George
might not be the BEST GM around, so perhaps Bill could do a better
job on that end....
The Pats are another cold weather team, so look for the typical Parcells
offense, which works well late in the season.
Yeah, it's entirely plausible that he could turn the franchise around....
'Saw
|
56.34 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 21 1993 17:04 | 9 |
|
Yes! This is the best thing to happen to the Patriots since Chuck
Fairbanks. And to think that the media has been all over James
Orthwein for knowing nothing about football. That's been the problem;
past owners *thought* they knew football, and were afraid to turn the
whole thing over to someone who does...
glenn
|
56.35 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Lou Gorman & da Master Plan | Fri Jan 22 1993 08:36 | 20 |
| Pats fans, here's some stuff to expect:
* Don't expect a winner right away. Parcels was 3-12-1 wif the Giants in year
1, I believe.
* Don't be surprised if you see some familiar Giants faces on the Pats
sidelines (I won't be surprised to see LT or Simms...)
* Expect the offense to be smash mouth. Remember Parcells' motto is:
"Power wins football games".
* He'll build a team that can win in the cold in November and December.
It'll be interesting, although I don't go to the heights of hoping for
Pats success like Chainsaw.
BTW, the Chainsaw has been noted praising hte Cowboys and the Pats, hmm,
his standing as a Giants fan must be questioned.
JD
|
56.36 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 22 1993 09:17 | 50 |
| >* Don't expect a winner right away. Parcels was 3-12-1 wif the Giants in year
> 1, I believe.
Yes, and they almost fired him. The nexted season the Giants were back
in the playoffs, losing to San Fran in the second round, 21-10.
>* Don't be surprised if you see some familiar Giants faces on the Pats
> sidelines (I won't be surprised to see LT or Simms...)
A lot of talk on WFAN about this. There is some speculation that Parcells
wouldn't do this, as he has "turned the page on the Giants".
>* Expect the offense to be smash mouth. Remember Parcells' motto is:
> "Power wins football games".
Parcells said that anyone not willing to work hard would be asked to
leave.
>* He'll build a team that can win in the cold in November and December.
Yep. I agree 100%.
>It'll be interesting, although I don't go to the heights of hoping for
>Pats success like Chainsaw.
I'd like to see Parcells do well. The better Parcells does, the worse
it looks for George Young, who I am beginning to doubt.
>BTW, the Chainsaw has been noted praising hte Cowboys and the Pats, hmm,
>his standing as a Giants fan must be questioned.
Do me, JD. 8^)
I haven't praised the Cowboys. I just said that I respected what they
have done with their football team in three season. Any football
fan would say the same thing.
I haven't praised the Pats. I am a big Parcells fan, and I want to
see him do well......
'Saw
|
56.37 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jan 22 1993 09:38 | 7 |
| Since I moved away from NE, I haven't followed the team that close.
Is John Stephens trying any harder than a few years back? Would he be
traded away if Parcy wasn't happy with his motivation?
I seemed to remember an always hurts, semi-productive Stephens after
his first great year...
|
56.38 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 22 1993 10:34 | 24 |
| �* Don't be surprised if you see some familiar Giants faces on the Pats
� sidelines (I won't be surprised to see LT or Simms...)
I'd be very surprised to see Simms. The Pats already have 3 QBs they
don't know what to do with and there is a push to get a 4th (Bledsoe or
Mirer).
�* Expect the offense to be smash mouth. Remember Parcells' motto is:
� "Power wins football games".
Pats fans have been calling that "boring football". It will be
interesting to see how they accept Parcells' offense. FWIW, the Pats
have been trying smash mouth football under the last 3 or 4 coaches.
It hasn't been that successful since Hannah retired, but I think as
this young OL continues to gain experience with each other it will get
better. They have a few guys who could become 100 yd/game rushers
again.
�* Don't expect a winner right away. Parcels was 3-12-1 wif the Giants in year
� 1, I believe.
I don't and hope the fans and front office show the patience required
to rebuild this team. I think Mac was canned prematurely because he
didn't bring the Pats to the playoffs in his second season.
|
56.39 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 22 1993 10:36 | 4 |
| Chip, Stephens started showing signs of his rookie season this past
year. I think he'll do just fine, or at the very least the Pats will
get a decent player/draft pick in return from him should they decide to
go with Russell.
|
56.40 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is THREE years old!!! | Fri Jan 22 1993 10:47 | 7 |
| Re: Stevens
The past two seasons his role has been different than his rookie year. He was
the running back as a rookie, but mid way through last year he was given the
starting fullback job. With his primary responisbility being to block for
Russell or Vaughn, he seemed to be reborn. Later in both seasons he got a few
carries, as well as some passes out into the flat where he looked good.
|
56.41 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 22 1993 10:50 | 43 |
| > I'd be very surprised to see Simms. The Pats already have 3 QBs they
> don't know what to do with and there is a push to get a 4th (Bledsoe or
> Mirer).
My best guess is that they grab Bledsoe.
> Pats fans have been calling that "boring football". It will be
> interesting to see how they accept Parcells' offense. FWIW, the Pats
> have been trying smash mouth football under the last 3 or 4 coaches.
> It hasn't been that successful since Hannah retired, but I think as
> this young OL continues to gain experience with each other it will get
> better. They have a few guys who could become 100 yd/game rushers
> again.
Giants fans ragged on Parcells offense for years as being boring. And
it was, but it ate up the clock, kept the ball away from the other team's
offense, and won football games.
I would have preferred a slightly more open offense, but hey, two Super
Bowls ain't bad.
The ONE big drawback of the Giants offense to me was the fact that they
were not a quick strike offense, and if they got down big, it was pretty
much over. Of course, with their Defense, that rarely happened.
> I don't and hope the fans and front office show the patience required
> to rebuild this team. I think Mac was canned prematurely because he
> didn't bring the Pats to the playoffs in his second season.
I don't know if he can bring them to the 'offs in two years, but he
did it with the Giants.
If Parcells can work his magic the team will be competitive though....
'Saw
|
56.43 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zo� Must Go | Fri Jan 22 1993 12:52 | 8 |
| � Congrats Bill! Hope you take 'em all the way!!!!!
� 'Saw
He will 'Saw. All the way to Saint Looee...
/Don
|
56.45 | ex | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Fri Jan 22 1993 13:21 | 4 |
| Parcells won't rest til they get to the big one? The man will die
from exhaustion;^)
Tim
|
56.46 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Fri Jan 22 1993 13:26 | 7 |
| FWIW Tommy,
That old NBC/Globe sage Will McDonough agrees with ya on Jones of
FSU. Or didya steal that from him??
Muchos
MikeL
|
56.47 | busy today :*( | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Fri Jan 22 1993 13:27 | 6 |
|
Didn't Stevans also severly injure some guy and end his career and
then, in addition to the injuries, develop into a bit of a head case?
????
|
56.49 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:13 | 1 |
| /Don, you callin' Orthwein a liar?
|
56.50 | Heaven forbid BigMac, I wouldn't call Clinton one either... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zo� Must Go | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:35 | 1 |
|
|
56.51 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:44 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 56.50 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Zo� Must Go" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^
She's gone already, Slasher.
Time to reprise the "skin bus" p-name.....
'Saw
|
56.52 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:53 | 6 |
| naughty, naughty 'Saw. See i don't mind much but last time someone tokk
this type of topic out of the p-name realm by using ^^^^ his hands
got slapped by one of the mods. JaKE I would protest big time :-)
The Crazy Met
|
56.53 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Get Barbara Bush off the $1 Bill | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:58 | 9 |
|
>>got slapped by one of the mods. JaKE I would protest big time :-)
^^^^
The only thing I'll protest is your inept ablility to use the shift key
properly.
JaKe
|
56.54 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zo� Did Go | Fri Jan 22 1993 16:00 | 4 |
| Let's get this topic back on track and talk about the St. Louis
Patriots!
/Don
|
56.55 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Jan 22 1993 16:02 | 8 |
| re: .53
wimp
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
56.56 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Get Barbara Bush off the $1 Bill | Fri Jan 22 1993 16:05 | 6 |
| Hey dweeb, who ya callin' a wimp????
(8^)*
JaKe
|
56.57 | For /Don.... | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 22 1993 16:06 | 12 |
|
Here comes the King here comes the Big Number One.
Budweiser beer, the beer that's second to none.
Move to St. Louis, and bring Parcells,
And ol Foxboro can just go to hell....
Da da da da da dada dada da daaaaaaaaa
Da da da da da dada dada da daaaaaaaaa
Da da da daaaa da, da da da da da
da da da da da da da da da da da da da ad da da.....
|
56.58 | The town that makes that crummy beer deserves the Patsies! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zo� Did Go | Fri Jan 22 1993 16:14 | 1 |
|
|
56.59 | | KALI::MORGAN | Low-End NaC | Fri Jan 22 1993 17:29 | 7 |
| The Pats won't draft Mirer or Bledsoe to hand the ball off. Unless
they trade the pick, it'll be Marvin Jones. You can dominate from the
linebacker position, whereas you need some help to dominate from the
down lineman position. So I can't see them taking either of the guys
from 'bama.
Steve
|
56.60 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 08:32 | 17 |
| > The Pats won't draft Mirer or Bledsoe to hand the ball off. Unless
> they trade the pick, it'll be Marvin Jones. You can dominate from the
> linebacker position, whereas you need some help to dominate from the
> down lineman position. So I can't see them taking either of the guys
> from 'bama.
I thought a lot about this this past weekend and I tend to agree.
I also lost sight of the fact that Parcells is of the school of thought
that Defense wins Championships. That means that he probably will
attempt to bolster the defense first....
I heard Season Tickets sales are going through the roof....
'Saw
|
56.61 | I'd even root for the team if they changed the name and logo | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Mon Jan 25 1993 08:35 | 18 |
|
Lots of talk on the radio about changing the teams name, color
and logo.
some of the ideas....
Boston Warlocks
Boston Warlords
Boston Bulldogs
Boston Beaners
Boston Gas
Re: Boston Gas - This guy wanted to take the logo and
turn the guy around. :-)
WOOF!
|
56.62 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 08:54 | 10 |
| Actually, I'm surprised.
In 1976 the organization wanted to "update" the Patriot symbol, with
a newer, more stylized version, and the fans totally voted it down.
I wish Ninj' was around so we could get some "poop" on what's going on....
'Saw
|
56.63 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 25 1993 10:29 | 7 |
| Still using the same sources you got all your Browns' news from, I see,
Hal.
Pats sold over 750 season tickets last Thursday. The ticket office was
open all weekend. People were driving to Foxborough because they
couldn't get through on the phones. Football fever has gripped the
Hub.
|
56.64 | Parcells paying off already | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:29 | 29 |
|
Just goes to show you what is possible if you use a little business
sense. Past Patriots' owners would have scoffed at Parcells' asking
price (as they did with many key players), but before the equipment has
even been unpacked from last season, Parcells has already generated
several hundred thousand dollars in new season ticket applications.
This is money in the bank collecting interest, money coming in before
even the renewals are due.
I still like Bledsoe. I liken the guy's situation to that of Terry
Bradshaw, in that's he raw, very young, and is coming to the pros from
a school that isn't known as a perennial power, so he's a bit
underrated if not underpublicized. The kid is still only *20* years
old! To be that big and fast and talented and yet only 20 is highly
remarkable (not like Vinnie Testaverde's situation, coming out at 24
after being red-shirted and/or held back in both high school and
college, and maybe even grade school, if the truth be known). As the
Dallas Cowboys have proved, there are many ways to build a top-notch
defense, but very rarely does a franchise QB come for free (and the
'Boys made the right choice going after Aikman first even though they
were a pathetic team with many needs at the time).
I trust Bill Parcells with whatever decision he makes, though. As the
man himself said at the press conference, he's one of the best talent
evaluators in the business, and no one thought for a minute that the
statement was egotistical.
glenn
|
56.66 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:21 | 14 |
|
Heard a rumor that Bledsoe MIGHT state that he wants to play near home
and that , like Mr. Ed, if a certain team drafts him, he'll refuse to
sign with them ^-(St. Louis?)
Him making that statement hurts the Pats & puts Seattle in a win (no
trade needed) - win (we get the QB anyway) situation.
Metz, hear anything of this in yo' backyard?
I remain,
wanting Jones,
Kev
|
56.67 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:51 | 8 |
| > and that , like Mr. Ed, if a certain team drafts him, he'll refuse to
> sign with them ^-(St. Louis?)
If the StL is a question about who first drafted Mr. Ed, it was
Baltimore.....
'Saw
|
56.68 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:04 | 4 |
| Isn't the QB that won the heisman coming out in the draft? Gino
Terretta or somfin like that.
A heisman is a sure winner, just ask uncle al;^)
|
56.69 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:14 | 22 |
|
> It doesn't hurt Aikman that he has the best running back in the
> league to hand off to, one of the best receivers in the league to
> throw to and one of the best lines in the league to stand behind.
> All he has to do is not screw up. Bledsoe ain't gonna have that
> luxury.
That's true enough now, Tommy, and it was true with Aikman when the
Cowboys were 1-15. Similarly, the Patriots will have to build at many
positions, and like the Cowboys they won't get that done with a single
#1 pick, regardless of where they go. But I don't think you give
Aikman enough credit. He does more than just "not screw up". In
fact, George Seifert commented that Aikman as much as anyone was the
guy who beat his team. Seifert claimed that they knew what everyone
else could do and what they had to do to stop them, and that indeed
they had some early success at slowing down Emmitt Smith, but Aikman
was damn near perfect. The kid is a critical piece to the team, not
just a lever-puller...
glenn
|
56.70 | true confessions | FRETZ::HEISER | Billary takes U.S. hostage | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:19 | 2 |
| It deeply pains me to admit this, but I have a hunch that Nother
Shame's Mirer will be a very good NFL QB.
|
56.71 | | DECWET::METZGER | I don't think so, Tim. | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:34 | 17 |
|
Bledsoe has repeatedly said that he will play for whatever team drafts him.
He's said it 5 times now and still gets stories written that he'll pull an
Elway. An article in the paper out here said that the Seahawks should try
and trade up (from the #2 spot) to ensure that they get Bledsoe..Ho-Ho-Ho.
I'd be very happy with the FSU linebacker at the #2 spot or if the Hawks
traded down and picked up some quality O-lineman and Mirer. Decent Qb's can
be gotten via the trade or free agency route. I still think that the Pats
will follow Tommy's theory and draft Graves and the Hawks will pick up Bledsoe
with the #2 pick.
Toretta won't amount to anything inthe pro's. He's Vinnie Testeverde V2.
Metz
|
56.73 | Albert DeSalvo look-alikes as cheerleaders | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Pats - Parade in January 19?? | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:51 | 14 |
| Mirer had another less than mediocre game yesterday in the (mumble,
mumble) All-Star game. He was 6-15 for 86 yards with 2 INT, and one
the completions was a 60+ yarder. This is a guy who couldn't generate
much of an offense behind five HS all-americans in the o-line who
averaged 285 pounds per man, unless he was playing some sub-standard
big-time pretender like BC. Mirer will do better once he's away from
Holtz, but he looks a lot like Browning Nagle to me!
As for naming the Pats, my favorite nickname was the Boston Stranglers.
The caller suggested a noose for a logo on the side of the helmets.
And when someone screwed up, you could hang him in effigy in the
papers. Lots of possibilities.
NAZZ
|
56.74 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Jan 25 1993 15:34 | 8 |
|
Comment by Dale Arnold on the present logo:
" I mean LOOK at the guy. Look at the expression on his face. The
guy looks like he's trying to take a DUMP!"
|
56.75 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:28 | 11 |
| Nazz,
I've seen Mirer on many occasion and I still think the jury is out
on him. I noticed vast improvement in the latter half of '92 but
he dooes have his moments of mediocrity/ineptitude ( see Stanford '92).
Whereas I agree that he MIGHT have done better stats-wise in more
open offense than Holtz', is not Parcells projected offense similar
to ND's? Emphasis on solid running game, ball control and a structured
controlled passing game?
MikeL
|
56.76 | about 1000000000000000000000 to 1 | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:34 | 6 |
|
The only way I'd root for the Pats is if they change their name,
team color, logo and field location. So, for me to drop the Browns,
what do you think the chances of the Patsies doing that???
WOOF!
|
56.77 | I like it...... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:48 | 15 |
| Somethang like 3,000 new season holders since the Parcells announcement
lasted Thursday.
Parcell's already hired 8 assistants and is expected to announce 3 more
maybe today. Stategically it's great he's moved so fast in hiring his
assistants because the other teams (like the NY(J) Giants) have yet to
hire a Head and Parcell's got the jump on the creme-de-la-creme of the
assistants....
It's just possible nexted season may turn out NOT to be a disaster?
I remain,
thinking some home games might be on tee vee too!
Kev
|
56.78 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:08 | 4 |
| Is Joe Collier still the defensive man, or did Parcells get rid of
him?
Tim
|
56.79 | Football with a somba beat ... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is THREE years old!!! | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:18 | 17 |
| Most notable move by Parcels was the appointment of Ray Perkins, his old boss,
as o-coordinator. The remainder of the staff is former Giants assistants.
The d-coordinator (Al Groh?) has no experience as a coordintor, but that is
probably cool, since Parcells will probably be pretty hands on with the D.
re: name, logo
I think they should take an astrological tract with this. Change the team name
to the Boston Novas. That way they could have some sort of star as a logo, and
their theme song would be:
"Blame it on the Boston Novas".
Sorry.
=Bob=
|
56.80 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:40 | 12 |
| >"Blame it on the Boston Novas".
>
>Sorry.
>
>=Bob=
I know Dickstah, and you, sir, are no Dickstah..... 8^)
'Saw
|
56.82 | but with THAT, you did come awfully close! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:42 | 1 |
|
|
56.83 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:43 | 17 |
| > With the hiring of Perkins, you could probably bet the Pats won't be
> drafting a QB. From all I've heard, he's big on the run, run, run.
> So why waste the number one on someone who'd be handing the ball off,
> when anyone can do that. Right?
I think you'll see something very similar to what the Giants did
under Parcells. I wouldn't call it "run" so much as "ball control".
It will be a conservative offense, with passing that is more controlled.
Look for the TE to get a lot of receptions....
It will also be a very good cold weather offense.....
hth,
'Saw
|
56.85 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 26 1993 11:14 | 4 |
| I didn't realize that Parcells was with the Pats earlier in his
career. Rumor had it he might bring Steve Grogan and Steve Nelson back
as coaches. Is this still a possibility given the coaches he's named
already?
|
56.86 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Jan 26 1993 11:29 | 4 |
| It would be beautiful if the Jets could get Marvin Jones with the 3rd
pick. By all means I hope the Pats take Bledsoe.
The Crazy Met
|
56.87 | Zolak? People were amused by his act, not impressed w/his play | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 26 1993 15:17 | 17 |
|
> I still think
> Zolak is good enough to win with and drafting Bledsoe would be a waste.
Bledsoe might be a waste but you're kidding about Zolak, right? Each
of the Super Bowl-winning QBs you listed got there because they
outperformed the opponents' QB (and I think that in this year's Bowl
the Aikman vs. Kelly matchup will again be the difference). When the
best go up against the best, the winner must get strong play from the
QB position. Scottie Zolak is not going to take the Patriots or anyone
else anywhere. Nor will Tommy Hodson. Hugh Millen *might* if he can
stay injury-free, but the clock is running on him. This hole in the
Patriots' lineup is not a trivial one...
glenn
|
56.89 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AllIWannaDoIsAZoom�AndABoom� | Tue Jan 26 1993 15:55 | 16 |
| As Mike Childs was saying in another note, we were at the Firehouse
last Sunday and there was a gaggle of yuppies seriously discussing Bill
Parcells and the New England Patriots. This does not bode well for folks
like Denny, Chap and I. Look what creeping yuppieism did to the Garden.
8^( And with regards to the mascot, I was at the game when the fans voted
for the old mascot over the squared jaw new one with the American flag in the
background. It was against the San Diego Chargers and a Grogan interception
almost blew the game (surprised?), until Steve Nelson made a goal line
interception to save the game. But if you notice over the years the facial
features have become less gruff (and less manly), to where today's mascot
almost resembles the one the fans unanimously voted down. If Parcells
brings a winner to Foxboro the yuppie caravan will migrate down Rte 1 and
infect Foxboro. Of course then, the sissified version of the mascot will be
quite appropriate.
/Don
|
56.91 | it's better than getting Reeves | CNTROL::CHILDS | take me to Roslyn Cafe | Tue Jan 26 1993 17:43 | 10 |
|
Al Groh was the defensive cordinator for the Giants in 91. He wasn't any
better or worst than Rust....
So another words GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!
Nelson could handle the linebackers and Grogan could handle the QB if
they need to find posistions for them....
mike
|
56.92 | I was under no illusions about Zolak's prospects... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 26 1993 18:22 | 15 |
|
> C'mon , Glenn you were singing a completely different tune not all that
> long ago (see below).
While I acknowledge that Zolak's physical skills are superior to
Millen's, my comments were mainly directed towards the ridiculous
policy of sending a lame QB out to get the hell beat out of him for
an 0-10 team, with absolutely nothing to gain for it in a lost season.
If you think Bledsoe would be a project, then Zolak is doubly so.
Zolak has taken very few snaps since *high school*, much less college.
He was drafted as a long-shot project with a big arm and based on his
brief appearances to date I'd say that his status is unchanged...
glenn
|
56.93 | Bill Parcels isn't going to change this team around in 10 years | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Tue Jan 26 1993 18:34 | 7 |
| The only reason Bill Parcels tooks this job is cause Mike Ditka can talk into a
mircophone and not sound like he's got marbles in his mouth. The day Mike
was fired Bill Parcels was fired by NBC and this guy needs the money to feed his
face and the Patroits picked up the tab.
Jeff
|
56.94 | Watch out Colts!!! | KALI::MORGAN | Low-End NaC | Wed Jan 27 1993 07:42 | 12 |
| Mike C.
I thought I read that Groh was the linebacker coach for the Gints?
Jeff R.
For the first time in history, the Pats have done something that's made
sense. I will say right here and now, the Patriots will have a .500
record or better next year.
Steve
|
56.95 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Jan 27 1993 08:38 | 12 |
| I heard last night on the FAN, in an interview with Dick Ebersole that
Parcells was one of their best analysts, but not the best (he said Trumpy
was).
Parcells had improved a lot during his tenure at NBC but the man wanted
to coach.
I agree with Steve, Parcells gets them to at least .500 next season...
'Saw
|
56.96 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:34 | 2 |
| Any confirmation on Mr. Riggins' assertion that Parcells was fired by
NBC?
|
56.97 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Jan 27 1993 10:12 | 10 |
| > Any confirmation on Mr. Riggins' assertion that Parcells was fired by
> NBC?
I don't have any confirmation, but if memory serves me correct, he
had another year left on his contract, but had a clause in there that
allowed him to leave if he chose to coach.
'Saw
|
56.99 | You naughty Rocky Mt coyote | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 27 1993 10:24 | 7 |
| I believe Mr Riggen is cackling agin, having yanked yo' chains.
Careful Jeff, I won't buy you a nearbeer if I get to Coloraddy
this year.
MikeL
|
56.100 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Wed Jan 27 1993 11:05 | 5 |
|
I expect to see replies in the Crow Cafe by both 'Saw and Steve sometime
in December of 1993.
The Crazy Met
|
56.102 | Zolak should get the job. | AD::HEATH | The jinx is broken, Sox '93 Champs | Wed Jan 27 1993 11:35 | 12 |
|
I would have to agree with .101. Millen is way overated anyhow.
With Parcells and Perkins all the Z man is going to have to do is
give the ball to Russell, Stephens or Vaughn and on occasion toss
a 10 yarder to Cook. Why waste the money that Bledsoe is going to
want when it could be spent on another player that is needed now.
I would like to see them trade the #1 pick for a proven center and
with the lower pick in the draft take the best available player
anyhow.
Jerry
|
56.103 | Handing the ball off wasn't enough for the Giants, same w/ Pats... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 27 1993 15:34 | 47 |
|
> Glenn, I usually think you have an intelligent, informed opinion
> but this time I think you're doing some serious spin control. You
Call it spin control or just a slight change of opinion, but we did get
to see Scott Zolak up close and personal 4-5 times (after I said
little more than it was obvious that he should be starting ahead of
Millen during this lost cause of a season), and I'm sincerely
unimpressed by his prospects as an NFL quarterback. And I'm not
sure how my comments came to be construed as an endorsement of Millen.
If I thought Millen were an adequate QB for an otherwise championship-
caliber team, I certainly wouldn't be in the Bledsoe camp. Millen is
entirely *inadequte*. All I've said is that Millen *might* be able to
be this "don't make any mistakes"-type QB that others feel is good
enough to win big in the NFL, but which I don't.
> And personally, I think the quarter-
> back postion is overrated anyways. Of the last ten or so Super Bowl
> winners the only team that had a bonafide "franchise" QB was the '9ers
> with Montana and even he had the the best offensive supporting cast, a
> dominating defense, strong special teams and the game's best coach/tact-
> ician.
I think the issue has become confused here. We're not debating which
is the single most important aspect to football, we're talking about
the decision on a single draft pick, *one* player. The Patriots are
not able with that one pick to draft an entire offensive line, or an
entire linebacking crew, or kicking game, or special teams squad, or
any of the other areas of the game you've intimated are more important
than QB play (some I agree with, some I don't). It's strictly a
decision on one player, unless they trade for a package, which both of
us have agreed we don't want to see. I submit that even on the teams
that have won it all without a "franchise" QB, the QB was still either
the most, or at least the second- or third-most important *single*
player on the team. I think that the Phil Simmses, Doug Williamses,
Mark Rypiens and such did much, much more than just hand the ball off
and get out of the way without making any mistakes. I don't think that
anyone the Patriots currently have at QB is even close to being able to
fill the duties that these players did.
Whether the Patriots should look for a QB through the draft or by other
means is a good question, but they'll eventually have to get one, or at
best they'll end up as bridesmaids as I think current teams like
Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Kansas City will unless they do the same...
glenn
|
56.105 | Blah blah blah | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Wed Jan 27 1993 18:12 | 5 |
| The single best thing the Patroits have done in is adding grass to Foxbourgh.
Parcells is gonna collect a check till the bank runs dry. This team needs
MONEY to win football games. The last time I checked the owners don't have very
deep pockets specially since they have them a high priced coach.
|
56.106 | | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Wed Jan 27 1993 19:16 | 11 |
|
You got it baby. In the new football era of free agency you'll
see the owners with deeper pockets purchasing themselves
some good teams.
Arguements that rich owners haven't been able to buy the WS in
baseball do not apply to football, a sport where the more
talented team wins a significantly larger portion of the time
than baseball.
Metz
|
56.107 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Wed Jan 27 1993 22:42 | 11 |
| re: .106
Free agency has also not won NBA championships, that of course is
because of the salary cap. Football has a salary cap mechanism as well
so teams will not be able to spend past a certain point. Only time will
tell if free agency will readically change the balance in the NFL to
the richer teams. Remember all teams share in TV revenue which is a
great equalizer.
The Crazy Met
|
56.108 | | KALI::MORGAN | Low-End NaC | Thu Jan 28 1993 07:45 | 21 |
| Have to agree with the Met on that one. If I'm not mistaken, were the
salary cap in effect today, the Skins, 49ers, Buffalo and a couple more
would already be over the cap, thereby denying them the opportunity to
sign any free agents. I'd guess that a team like Dallas, loaded with a
bunch of young stars, would be at or near the cap quite soon. Of
course, if they can keep them all in Dallas they shouldn't have any
worries.
The difference in football and basketball is that in football, teams
are more willing to dump an aging veteran much quicker than in the NBA.
For example, Robert Parish and Kevin McHale would be long gone if their
career of choice had been the NFL, yet they're still pulling in serious
money playing hoop.
Regarding the Pats, I'd say this'll be Andre Tippett's last year. He's
not anywhere near the player he once was, but commands a high salary
nonetheless. If the players thought that management was quick with the
knife in the past, I'd guess that they will be even more so in the
future.
Steve
|
56.109 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 28 1993 09:41 | 6 |
| �Parcells is gonna collect a check till the bank runs dry. This team needs
�MONEY to win football games. The last time I checked the owners don't have very
�deep pockets specially since they have them a high priced coach.
I think you need new sources, Jim. Orthwein's pockets are deep thanks
to ties with Anheuser-Busch.
|
56.110 | Budweiser money is very old and very deep... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 28 1993 09:44 | 33 |
|
> Arguements that rich owners haven't been able to buy the WS in
> baseball do not apply to football, a sport where the more
> talented team wins a significantly larger portion of the time
> than baseball.
Huh? It's true that the most talented teams in baseball win less on a
percentage basis, but that's why they play 162 games. The talent still
rises to the top, especially with a more selective playoff system in
place. I think what you're implying is that the game of baseball
itself is "flukier", Metz, and I'd have to disagree if we're talking
about the regular season. The reasons that free agency won't destroy
competitive balance in football are the same as in baseball: 1) there
aren't enough starting spots on the "rich" teams to accomodate all the
talented players, 2) even "poor" teams will actively pursue free
agents, especially so in the NFL with its 100% equitable TV
revenue-sharing system, and 3) the benefits of the free agent market
are highly unpredictable to begin with, as time and time again owners
have demonstrated that they will throw themselves at "sure thing"
veteran players who have undoubtedly had their better days with someone
else.
Besides, in the case of the Patriots and James Orthwein we are talking
about very deep pockets anyway. About as deep as they come, folks.
He certainly has the capital to shape this team anyway he wants, and it
makes sense to do so even if he is going to sell (in my opinion, as I
think that the NE football market has tremendous potential that is as
yet untapped). The question is whether he will have the time to follow
through and do so, but so far with the Parcells and assistant hirings
the signs are good...
glenn
|
56.111 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 28 1993 09:44 | 9 |
| > I think you need new sources, Jim. Orthwein's pockets are deep thanks
> to ties with Anheuser-Busch.
In addition, Parcells is already drawing folks in. The recent season
ticket sales show that.
'Saw
|
56.112 | John Cooper for PR director | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Thu Jan 28 1993 10:19 | 13 |
|
Heard this little bit of news on the radio.
Pats are going to dump their helmet logo as well as change their
uniform color. They're checking with NFL Properties and are looking
into sveral new designs. Supposedly they're looking at retaining the
red jerseys, and incorporating silver pants and helmets wif a new logo.
Jeez, almost like Ohio St. Let's hope they don't continue to play like
the Buckeyes.
MikeL
|
56.113 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AllIWannaDoIsAZoom�AndABoom� | Thu Jan 28 1993 10:26 | 9 |
| RE: Parcells salary.
Well Jeff, the Patriots have already sold about 1,500 season
tickets and that translates to about 500K extra the team has that would not
be in the coffers had they not hired Parcells. And who knows how much
revenue would've been lost in season ticket cancellations had the team not
hired Parcells. Sounds like a smart financial move too.
/Don
|
56.115 | the burning question | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Thu Jan 28 1993 12:52 | 7 |
| Has any coach ever won it all with two different teams? Either Super
Bowl or pre-Super Bowl. I know that Don Shula has lost the SB with
two different teams (Colts and Dolphins), but don't know about the
winning. For that matter, has any coach other than Shula lost it
all with two different teams.
Jerry
|
56.116 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Thu Jan 28 1993 12:56 | 5 |
| Weeb Ewbanks won it all with the Colts in "The Greatest Game
Ever Played 'Cuz it was played in New York" and with the Jets in
"The Greatest Super Bowl ever played 'Cuz a New York team won".
/Don
|
56.117 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Jan 28 1993 13:19 | 7 |
| Mebbe they'll make if official and put little "x"'s over Patsy's
eye's... ;-)
I'd like to see'm go to a White hell-mutt with a red stripe, keep it
plain like the Dawgs or Penn-State.
(I bet they get crazy and make it real busy)
|
56.118 | Can you say incoming? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Thu Jan 28 1993 16:20 | 4 |
| For their helmets, I'd like to see a picture of Saddam Hussein, looking
upward, with a look of sheer terror on this face.
Jerry
|
56.119 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 28 1993 16:39 | 4 |
| I dunno, maybe it's me but I LIKED their helments and their uniforms....
'Saw
|
56.121 | I know, Tommy, I've got TOO much free time 8^) | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 28 1993 16:58 | 16 |
| > >> I dunno, maybe it's me but I LIKED their helments and their uniforms....
>
> Nope. It ain't just you. I like 'em just the way they are, too.
Well, I see I'm in some FINE company then.
I'm a bit of a traditionalist. I'm not usually too upset when colors
change (ie the Oilers going from a silver helmet with blue oil rig,
to a white helmet with blue oil rig) but I don't like to see the logos
change too much.
I think they should leave them. And I might just write them a letter
and tell them that too.
'Saw
|
56.122 | what a surprise | FRETZ::HEISER | FREE Dallas Cowboy hats! | Thu Jan 28 1993 17:29 | 1 |
| Tommy and I finally agree on something.
|
56.123 | | FDCV06::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Fri Jan 29 1993 08:25 | 5 |
| The helmut design s*cks bigtime.... I rather they go with
something of New Endland folklore... Like Kaim being burned at the
stake.... Or someone sitting on a chair being dunked...
REK
|
56.125 | I *get into* my teams | FRETZ::HEISER | FREE Dallas Cowboy hats! | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:25 | 6 |
| > the NBA. But I think you may be just a little to fanatical about
> 'em. Sort of a John Hinckley/*Travis Bickle/Get-a-hobby type fanat-
> ical.
I was like that over the Celts too when they had an active Dream
Teamer.
|
56.127 | | METSNY::francus | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Tue Feb 02 1993 14:22 | 4 |
| Not sure why the connection between New Jersey and New England. The
2 are definitely different.
The Crazy Met
|
56.128 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Tue Feb 02 1993 15:01 | 13 |
| >Not sure why the connection between New Jersey and New England. The
>2 are definitely different.
It's close, as compared with Seattle.
Parcells spent time coaching in West Point (close to New England) and
for the Pats before coming to the Giants....
Probably has something to do with all those reasons....
'Saw
|
56.130 | | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Tue Feb 02 1993 18:10 | 10 |
|
Actually the lifestyles between New England and seattle are pretty close. The
seattle area mirrors the northshore of Mass. I'd say there was more of a contrast
between the sewage dumps of Jersey and New England than Seattle and NE. :-)
Which doesn't even come close to the lifestyle differences between the south
and NE.
Metz
|
56.131 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Tue Feb 02 1993 18:32 | 11 |
| >Actually the lifestyles between New England and seattle are pretty close. The
>seattle area mirrors the northshore of Mass. I'd say there was more of a contrast
>between the sewage dumps of Jersey and New England than Seattle and NE. :-)
I realized that I had made a slight blunder using Seattle as an example.
I was just looking at distance.
Seattle is a lot like New England, except the folks are far friendlier....
'Saw
|
56.133 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Wed Feb 03 1993 11:26 | 6 |
| If I were the Patriots I would do anything in my power to get
Reggie White on the team. It would sell more tickets and upgrade
the defense by at least 25%. He may not want to come here, but
it doesn't hurt to try.
/Don
|
56.134 | Get real!! | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:48 | 7 |
|
I doubt seriously that Reggie White would want to go to the Patsies no
matter how much they payed. He wanted that SB Ring for some time and knows NE has
little or no chance of getting their during whats left of his career.
Cadzilla
|
56.135 | Reggie White + Dawgs = Playoff contender | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Wed Feb 03 1993 13:08 | 6 |
|
Reggie White will sign with the Cleveland Browns...its a done deal!
WOOF!
|
56.136 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 03 1993 15:52 | 8 |
|
I dunno, I like the fact that Bill Parcells has been dropping Reggie
White's name a lot in public lately. Whether he'd come is another
story, but when Big Bill lets the media know that Reggie is "the
best there is", it can't hurt...
glenn
|
56.137 | Giants, Redskins, Cowboys,9er's Patsies NOT | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Wed Feb 03 1993 17:37 | 4 |
|
And him being the best there is ?? would give you the idea he would like to play
for the best there is and not New England.
|
56.138 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Wed Feb 03 1993 17:46 | 5 |
| Why would he sign with the Browns when he could sign with the Erlers
and rejoin Buddy Ryan?
I heard the 'Skins have the inside track anyway...
|
56.139 | Or do the 9ers plan on losing Joe? | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Wed Feb 03 1993 18:51 | 6 |
|
Don't those top tier teams (skins, 49ers..etc.) have to lose a free agent before
they can sign one?
Metz
|
56.140 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Thu Feb 04 1993 00:17 | 11 |
| Only the 4 final playoff teams must lose a player to free agency before
being able to sign one; fwiw Dallas will definitely lose Burlein (sp?)
The next 4 teams can sign a limited number of players, not sure how
many.
All other teams (including the 4 first round losers in the playoffs)
can sign as many free agents as they want.
The Crazy Met
|
56.141 | football + Cleveland = support | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Thu Feb 04 1993 08:17 | 8 |
|
The reason Reggie White will sign with the Browns is because
there is a commitment to winning in Cleveland. Cleveland is a
real football town!
WOOF!
|
56.142 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 04 1993 09:23 | 9 |
|
Reggie White is an unrestricted free agent not because of his contract
status but as a result of the settlement of the lawsuits in which he
was a plaintiff (he cannot be tagged as a "franchise player" by the
Eagles, etc.). As such, I believe that he can sign with any team
without compensation or limitation...
glenn
|
56.143 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Thu Feb 04 1993 10:18 | 19 |
| Reggie White is still bound by the Rooney Rule, which says that he
cannot sign with any of the final four teams (Miami, SF, Buffalo and
Dallas) unless they lose the same value free agent. For example, if
Beurline (sp) signs with another team for $3 million a season, Dallas
could sign Reggie for the same $3 million a season. Other than that,
the final eight teams (includes the Eagles, Washington, San Diego and
Pittsburgh) may only sign one free agent over $1.5 million without
having a matching free agent that the lost, similar to the final four
arrangement. Any of the final eight teams may sign as many free agents
as they want for under $1 million a player.
IMO, the only team that has a shot at Reggie from the final four is
Dallas, losing Beurline (sp). The only other free agent that any of
those teams that will get close to what White will demand is Steve
Young, and he will more than likely be either designated a "franchise"
player or will be one of the 49ers match players.
Dennis Faust
|
56.144 | | METSNY::francus | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Thu Feb 04 1993 11:00 | 8 |
|
SF could lose Montana so they could sign a free agent.
White would be a free agent since his contract is over. The clause
regarding the lawsuit is that he cannot be designated as a franchise
player, but the Eagles might not have done that anyway.
The Crazy Met
|
56.145 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Thu Feb 04 1993 11:34 | 4 |
| I thought that the club had an option for one more year on Montana
and that Steve Young was a free agent.
/Don
|
56.146 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Thu Feb 04 1993 18:20 | 8 |
| Montana is indeed under contract for a bit yet with the 49ers.
Reggie White has been given a qualifing offer from the Eagles. It was
some legal deal so that they may be in line for some type of draft pick
as compensation if White signs elsewhere.
Dennis Faust
|
56.147 | My suspicion is that this has "trade down" written all over it | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 17 1993 09:47 | 13 |
|
Unless they're bluffing, the local papers are reporting that the Patriots
are in the market for a QB with the #1 pick, Bledsoe or Mirer, depending
on whom you believe. According to the Glob, Marvin Jones is out of the
running because he measures up at only 6'1", 235 lbs, which might allow
him to become a fine conventional inside linebacker (which is basically
what he was at FSU), but not the monster dominant pass-rushing all-purpose
LB/DE in the LT or Derrick Thomas mold. Apparently none of the
defensive players available this year measures up in this regard,
including Alabama DEs Curry and Copeland.
glenn
|
56.149 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Time to Pay the Bill for the 1980's | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:20 | 1 |
| Last year, Taylor was listed at 6'3" 243 lbs.
|
56.150 | I still like the franchise-QB idea, and will take either one... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:23 | 26 |
|
That is admittedly the problem with QB. Any or all of them could turn
out to be a Marc Wilson. But I don't think the comments about Bledsoe
were physically comparing him to Wilson, they were just general
statements on college "systems", which if you think it through
shouldn't matter if your talent evaluators know what they're doing
(anyone can go to the "right" school and put up good numbers; these
guys are supposed to see through that). There is no comparison
physically between Wilson and Bledsoe or Mirer. Wilson couldn't run
and didn't have a very strong arm, nor was he even that highly
regarded by the pros (I think). And of course no one is complaining
about the BYU system in the case of Steve Young, who does have the
tremendous physical skills.
> Granted, 6'1" 235lbs isn't all that big by NFL standards but how much
> bigger are Derrick Thomas and LT ? I'd be surprised if Thomas was much
> over 235. Speed is his forte. And LT always played at about 245, no?
I think the concern is more with his height, not his weight. If you
have the frame for it you can always add weight anyway. You can't get
taller to get in a QB's face or to use arm extension to slip blockers.
But I think that at best Jones could develop into a Wilber
Marshall-type (and there's certainly nothing wrong with that).
glenn
|
56.151 | | RUGBY1::way | J. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-string | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:30 | 8 |
| I think back to Lambert playing at 220! 8^)
LT is around 245, but he has a lot of strength on that frame and
his arms are massive.
'Saw
|
56.152 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices\ | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:31 | 5 |
|
the Cardinals are planning on taking which Alabama DE is left by the
4th pick. Hopefully the PAts will take a QB
brews
|
56.154 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 17 1993 11:49 | 22 |
|
Yeah, I saw the quote and I'm still not sure what the unnamed AFC East
GM (probably old friend Dick Steinberg) means by them. If you
substitute Mirer's name and say "if he is just another Marc Wilson and
you use the first pick to take him, it's a disaster" is the statement
any less valid? Or does the PR associated with Mirer's name cover him?
As has been documented many times in here, Rick Mirer was *not* an
up-on-my-shoulders-boys big game performer, and you'd think that
playing at Notre Dame would help a QB more than playing at Washington
St., so I'm at a total loss as to who this Rick Mirer was that was winning
games for Notre Dame "on his own". I suspect that the guy likes Mirer,
which is fine, but "big game performer" and "another Marc Wilson"
sounds too much like empty rhetoric for me. You'd like to think that
they're a bit more scientific than that.
Again, I don't care who they take; just get the right man. Break out
the films and the tape measures and radar guns and stopwatches and
psychological tests and whatever else it is that Bill Parcells likes
to use and get the right guy...
glenn
|
56.155 | | CAMONE::WAY | J. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-string | Wed Feb 17 1993 12:01 | 13 |
| > psychological tests and whatever else it is that Bill Parcells likes
> to use and get the right guy...
You gotta get a guy that he can give a nickname to, like when the Giants
got Elliot. He supposedly got the Jumbo nickname because at the end of
one of his first practices they were gonna run laps around the field,
and he was plodding along, and Parcells yelled out "C'mon there, Jumbo"
The name stuck....
'?Saw
|
56.157 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknight | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:14 | 4 |
| Rick Mirer? The one that played for ND? I thought Parcells
was going to build a mainly team? 8^(
/Don
|
56.158 | It does make for interesting speculation... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:21 | 19 |
|
> As for being more "scientific",
> I think they're already *too* scientific. There has to come a point
> when the numbers only mean so much and what it comes down to is, *is
> the guy a football player?*.
This much I wholeheartedly agree with. Inside of some reasonable
physical parameters I think devoted film study is probably the best bet
in evaluating talent. At least you're watching the guy play football.
I just got a chuckle from the comments of this unidentified "AFC East
GM", who was even referring to Bill Walsh not by name but as "The
Genius" (a nickname that's supposed to be reserved for Jerry Glanville).
I just wonder if this interview was all on the up-and-up or if there
isn't some chicanery going on. By the same token Bill Parcells may have
his true intentions completely hidden from the media, and may be going
in a different direction entirely.
glenn
|
56.159 | Will the real Rick Mirer stand up please? | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:35 | 51 |
|
Performing well at the end of a game is often the overriding factor
in armchair judging of college QB's by us masses. I often overlook
(when it's not ND) what happened the first 40-45 minutes that creates
the setting for those last few minutes( read Elway ad nauseum).
Having said that, I've got some strong opinions on Mirer relating to
that. Yes, Mirer has performed well in several games at the end, and
more importantly throughout the whole game. Examples being Michigan
'90, Michigan State '90, Penn St '92 (altho glenn will claim it was the
Penn St prevent defense!). Several games he has come out solid in the
first half only to "disappear in half 2; Penn St '90, Stanford '90,
Colorado Orange Bowl, Tennessee '91. And other games he shoulda
stayed in bed; Stanford '92, Penn St '91.
Mirer, INO, has been consistently inconsistent in his overall
college performance. Quarters of brilliance followed by quarters
of mediocrity and ineptitude. I don't know if you chalk that
up to immaturity, not being totally comfortable with Holtz'
run-oriented, controlled pass offense, lack of concentration,
confidence, or even "feeling the footsteps". I assume it's a
combination of all. But let me say this; after the Stanford debacle,
I thought "here we go again" Mirer is up to his old Jekyll/Hyde
tricks. But for the rest of his senior year, Mirer was immense in
general.
The knock on Mirer is that he was not perceived as a " take charge"
guy in the huddle and seemed a little tentative at times in crunch
time. He certainly has shownm a history of that, particularly his
junior year. Also, he had not handl;ed a good pash rush during his
career. He seemed to freeze up agasinst a solid pass rush ( read
Stanford '92).
If you look at the above knocks, you will also see a guy who came
up huge against Penn St in '92, Tennessee in '90, Michigan in '90,
and Florida in the Sugar in the fourth quarter of each game.
He's an enigma. His postives are his mobility, scrambling, and
yes, passing skills. He can pass both in the pocket and on the run.
He's 6'2, 215. The scouts say he's got a "good arm', not great. Well
I think he has a gun, maybe not quiteas strong as Elway or Bledsoe, but
cetainly not weak. He can throw the cross field look-in.
So to sum up, He's got immense talent and needs to gain consistensy.
If the real Rick Mirer is the quarterback that looked damned good
against BC, Penn St, USC and Texas A&M to close out the ND season,
then he can be a franchise-type player.
I haven't seen much of Bledsoe so I can't comment. Let me say this,
though. If Parcells feels that either one can be a great QB, then
you have to take that man. Franchise QB's do not grow on trees.
|
56.161 | sorry to bust your collective bubbles | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Wed Feb 17 1993 14:31 | 12 |
| Let's face it folks. We can sit here and thrash through stats and
opinions, but it's all nothing more than a crap shoot! Sure, if the
player you hype up now turns out to be a REAL NFL player than you
can do the rooster strut and puff that old chest out and say, "I told
yunz guys!" But if he doesn't, which unfortunately is more often the
case, who cares?
After all these are the Patriots we are talking about, right?
nyuk, nyuk,
Bill
|
56.162 | | DECWET::METZGER | Zeros and Ones.... | Wed Feb 17 1993 16:51 | 30 |
|
I can't seriously believe that people are buying this Bledsoe is a product of
the WSU system crap. WSU was a school on the verge of being an annual Pac-10
patsy after Erickson left. Along comes Bledsoe and after getting hammered his
freshman year (even then I was more enamored of him than Mark Brunnel).
His sophomore year he started to lead an othewise mediocre team back out of
the trenches. The cougs got hammered by the huskies in the Apple cup again
but Bledsoe still looked worlds better than almost any college QB i'd seen
that year.
This year he led a team with some decent wide recievers and an average running
back to a bowl game. If anybody saw the apple cup this year where Bledsoe
was the only person unaffected playing in a blizzard you'd realize that he
is definately the #1 qb in the college game.
I've seen plenty of Rick Mirer and probably 7 games with Bledsoe and Bledsoe
is 10x the QB mirer is. Not only are his physical tools better but so is his
consistancy, ability to read defenses and attitude.
Granted he got to show his strengths in the pass oriented WSU system but he
wasn't throwing behind the O-line of the Irish, to the WR's of the Irish and
he didn't have 2 NFL class running backs with him in the backfield either.
It's a serious snowjob by the NFl dudes...
Bledsoe will be the 1st QB taken and he'll be an Aikman type franchise QB for
the team that gets him...
Metz
|
56.163 | just yankin your chain... | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Wed Feb 17 1993 18:22 | 4 |
| So Metz, what you are saying here is that you don't have an opinion
one way or the other?
Bill
|
56.164 | Whew | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Feb 17 1993 23:14 | 13 |
| Well Metz,
I'll go halfway and agree with ya on Mirer in some aspects; Mirer had
the offensive line, etc. but ND's offense was not the pass-oriented
deal that Bledsoe had (here I'm taking your word for this, having
watched glimpses of him in the bowl game) and he has his faults.
Buut if you expect me to believe that Bledsoe is 10X better than Mirer,
then I'm Robert Parish' mailman. Git real main!
MikeL
|
56.165 | fwiw | JUPITR::MIOLA | Phantom | Thu Feb 18 1993 03:39 | 11 |
|
should prove interesting if they take a QB...
From the latest poop I've heard...
Bill P. now is leaning towards Bledsoe after his interviews, and
Perkins wants Mirer because he doesn't feel like Bledsoe takes football
serious enough because of the Bungie Jumping.
Lou
|
56.166 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Feb 18 1993 06:54 | 7 |
| I don't see Parcells going for a franchise QB so much as going after
what he feels is a potential NFL QB who can run Parcells' type of
offense. If he selects a QB as #1, then it must be his opinion that
this is the best place to start, given the talent available, regardless
of the position.
Lee
|
56.168 | | MKFSA::LONG | I got friends in low places | Fri Mar 26 1993 07:26 | 6 |
| new logo???
what's it look like?
Billl
|
56.170 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Mar 26 1993 11:51 | 4 |
| Like I said in another note the logo looks like "The Old Man
In The Mountain" on LSD. Hope they like it in Saint Looee.
/Don
|
56.171 | | SALEM::DODA | Bill's Pork Parade Rolls on | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:17 | 7 |
| Re: st. Louie
Almost average things come to those who wait?
Nah, they're stayin.
daryll
|
56.172 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie has a tooth!!! | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:41 | 19 |
| To continue Slasher's QB conversation in the STEELER'S note (I always capitalize
STEELERS in recognition of JaKe):
Hugh Millen is a decent QB, who can take a hit without suffering from the Jeff
Hostetler Happy Feet Syndrome. He's not a superstar, and I suspect that Scott
Secules will give them about the same job for half the money. Of course none
of this matters until the Pats get a center who could stop Irene Ryan from
penetrating the backfield.
re:Logo
I don't think logos per se is what is selling team clothing these days.
Kids seem to be more attracted to colors than anything else. Unless the
Pats change their colors to teal and black, don't look for them to sell a
whole lot of apparel.
I dunno, give me good old Packer green and gold any day.
=Bob=
|
56.173 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shane, The Wonder Dog | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:47 | 20 |
| >
>I don't think logos per se is what is selling team clothing these days.
>Kids seem to be more attracted to colors than anything else. Unless the
>Pats change their colors to teal and black, don't look for them to sell a
>whole lot of apparel.
I recently receive e-mail that in a momentous decision, the BofD decided
to change OUR logo from blue to some queer shade of (flip wrist when
you say it) maroon.
Now, most sports clothing today is going towards black, closely followed
by the "cowboy's blue" that the Whalers recently switched to. Those colors
were chosen primarily because of their marketability to buyers in pro
shops.
So, leave it to DEC to pick a POWER color for their new logo.....
'Saw
|
56.174 | | MKFSA::LONG | I got friends in low places | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:10 | 5 |
| The only Mainly colors are BLACK and GOLD.
IMHO
billl
|
56.175 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:18 | 2 |
| I heard they used Lucky Lindburgh for the profile... Makes it an
easier conversion when the move! ;-)
|
56.176 | but maybe on the helmet | MAYES::MAILLOUX | | Mon Mar 29 1993 13:29 | 10 |
|
Is it just coincidence that red, white and blue are the colors
for the state of Missouri as well as for Bud!! Mr. Gee made
mention of this in the Herald yesterday. They also had two
logo's, one with the Granite face the other without. I don't
want to say the writing is on the wall but...
RM
|
56.177 | drugs explain it | HBAHBA::HAAS | Disoriented Wandering Adult | Thu Apr 01 1993 10:51 | 9 |
| I seen the new logo and uniforms on ESPN and while I don't know about the
old man in the mountain, but someone is doing LSD. Could be something
outta Heavy Metal. Even the guys who were wearing the new togs looked
embarassed, like maybe they weren't getting enough money for all the
humiliation they were suffering.
Can't wait to see how this looks on the field ;-(
TTom
|
56.178 | | ROYALT::ASHE | And if you... just go ahead now | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:12 | 2 |
| Looked to me like some good Arena football jerseys...
|
56.179 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Cmon baby,finish what you started | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:32 | 1 |
| I was thinking USFL Jerseys....
|
56.180 | | MKFSA::LONG | I got friends in low places | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:35 | 7 |
| I know that putting this in here I could be tossed right outa
"Traditionalists Anonymous", but I really thought it looked ok
on the silver helmet. My only concern, from the marketing side,
is how will it look on the baseball caps? My guess is about as
dumb as the Seahawk.
billl
|
56.181 | paranoid hallicination? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Disoriented Wandering Adult | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:59 | 8 |
| > ... My only concern, from the marketing side,
> is how will it look on the baseball caps? My guess is about as
> dumb as the Seahawk.
Based on how it looked on the football helmets, I think "dumb" is being
charitable.
TTom
|
56.182 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | The snow has melted, time to tee off! | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:05 | 4 |
|
It sounds like the real logo is the new face on top of the "P"
in Patriots. The new face is only by itself on the helmets and uniform
sleeve. For merchandise like hats, the logo will be
|
56.184 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shane, The Wonder Dog | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:24 | 22 |
| It's pretty funny in a way.
The team has become a laughing stock in the past couple of season.
They got a new coach, who has a good reputation for turning losers into
winners, and that's good.
So why didn't they just leave the old, staunch, traditional logo alone
for a couple of years until they were winning. Folks are a lot less
likely to criticize a winning team than a losing one.
Now, when they lose a game, not only will the fans beat up the team
but the logo as well...
It would be one thing, if they had a really stupid logo to begin
with (like the Whalers green road unis). Then, if they changed and it
improved, then it's cool (like the Whalers going to blue). But the
Pats old logo was so much better.....
'Saw
|
56.185 | | ROYALT::ASHE | And if you... just go ahead now | Thu Apr 01 1993 14:40 | 2 |
| What did the Chicago Blitz uniforms look like?
|
56.186 | Beam me up | MAYES::MAILLOUX | | Thu Apr 01 1993 17:07 | 5 |
|
I don't think the logo's that bad, compared to say ah a Buffalo
with a lazer beam sticking out of it ;^)
RM
|
56.187 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 11:15 | 6 |
| The Patriots Cost Cutting Measures continue as Irving Fryar
is now a Dolphin. With the increase in ticket sales and the decrease
in payroll the profit made this season may just cover the moving
costs to St. Louis.
/Don
|
56.188 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 02 1993 12:51 | 6 |
| �So why didn't they just leave the old, staunch, traditional logo alone
�for a couple of years until they were winning.
One of the official reasons is that it is too intricate and thus too
difficult to mass produce for NFL Properties. The NFL has been wanting
the Pats to change their logo for years.
|
56.189 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Apr 02 1993 12:58 | 9 |
|
I actually think the worst thing that the Pats did was change the base
uniform color from red to blue. Color establishes a team's most basic
identity, even before the logo design. Alas, this movement toward the
"attractive" colors is starting to dominate all sports, such as the
movement in baseball towards every wannabe looking like the LA Dodgers.
glenn
|
56.190 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:13 | 9 |
| Bill Parcells is GOD! Everything the Patriots have done so
far is GREAT! When I got home last night I burnt all my OLD Patriots
hats, shirts etc and am looking forward to spending this and next
week's paychecks on the NEW stuff! I only hope for two things,
first that the EVIL media leave PARCELLS and ORTHWEIN alone and
second that the PATRIOTS raise ticket prices so they can scrape
up enough money to keep the TEAM here!
/Don
|
56.191 | | CTHQ::LEARY | UNC:AnomalyOnHorizon;CHAMPEENSHIP | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:14 | 12 |
| Hey Waugamain!!
Welcome back from spring training! Where's yo' trip report?
Did ya see Dick Radatz?? Tell me, do the Sox REALLY have a chance for
5th place??
And on the Pats' scene.... local radio personalities Tom Doyle and
Craig Condiment on WEEI have created a new personality for their
show... Puxatawney Bill.. you guessed it, the new haid coach of the
Pats who only comes out ta see his shadow. Kinda humorous.
MikeL
|
56.192 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:15 | 4 |
| ...Oh yeah, and I also hope the STATE raises our TAXES to build
this WONDERFUL franchise the kind of stadium they deserve!
/Don
|
56.193 | | CAMONE::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:22 | 11 |
| > ...Oh yeah, and I also hope the STATE raises our TAXES to build
> this WONDERFUL franchise the kind of stadium they deserve!
Heard on WFAN yesterday that the NFL is now telling the Patriots that
they need to have a domed stadium in Boston.
It didn't sound too facetious, but you never know......
'Saw
|
56.194 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:25 | 5 |
| NOTHING is too good for the PATRIOTS 'Saw! I'm more than willing
to fork over 25% of my paycheck if it will keep PARCELLS and ORTHWEIN
happy!
/Don
|
56.195 | awaken note! Awaken... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Fri Apr 09 1993 13:54 | 8 |
|
Yabbut I think the new logo was snitched from a '42 (or wuz that '52?)
DeSoto hood ornament!
I remain,
traditionally yours!
Kev
|
56.196 | It's almost draft day; how about it? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 21 1993 14:01 | 12 |
|
What do you guys think of this proposal to trade the #1 pick to San
Francisco for two low first-round picks, a low second, and a third?
The selection numbers are #18, #27, #57, and #83. That's quantity, but
the picks in general seem too low for the kind of players available at
the top this year. Didn't the Pats get the #10 and #12 picks for only
a #4 a few years ago, which they effectively wasted on Singleton and
Agnew? As a fan and not a draft or talent guru, I know I don't like
the sounds of this...
glenn
|
56.197 | | METSNY::francus | ABP | Wed Apr 21 1993 14:12 | 5 |
|
As a fairly objective observer of the Pats I would say they should not make that
deal. The quality available seems to fall off somewhere in the 10-15 pick range.
The Crazy Met
|
56.198 | Waiting for Sunday at noon!!! | DEMING::WEST | | Wed Apr 21 1993 14:28 | 12 |
|
My opinion is that the PATS would take Bledsloe except for the fact
that his agent is asking for a 4 year deal in the area of 17+ million.
This is chasing the Pats away, also Mirers' agent wants a 4 year deal
worth about 15 million....The Pats want something in this draft not
a big ?? on if they can sign someone....there has been talk that they
could get 4-6 quality players and fill in where they need for the same
amount of money. Take the draft picks and maybe deal a Mullen and the
18th pick to someone and move up in the draft.....
/kevin
|
56.200 | | FDCV06::KING | Jessinator attacks Disney, film @11 | Wed Apr 21 1993 15:01 | 3 |
| Hey Karen.... What happened at bowling lasted night? :-}
REK
|
56.201 | | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Wed Apr 21 1993 19:29 | 17 |
|
The pats should trade down to the number 4 or 5 slot and grab some huge
offensive lineman. It appears that Parcell's can get by wiht a mediocre QB in
his system and as evidenced by the latest free agent signings teams are placing
a priority on offensive lineman to build teams around.
Dropping below 10 in this years draft is another way to insure the continued
mediocrity of the Pats by filling holes w/ mediocre crap shoot players instead
of getting some cajones and drafting an impact player for a change.
By dropping to a #4 or 5 slot then can weasel somebodies 2nd round pick to
continue the mediocre stocking of warm bodies....
Either way the 'Hawks will stay at #2 and pick whomever of Bledsoe or Mirer
is left (they prefer Bledsoe for aarm strength and local boy story)
Metz
|
56.202 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 22 1993 13:58 | 13 |
|
> Either way the 'Hawks will stay at #2 and pick whomever of Bledsoe or Mirer
> is left (they prefer Bledsoe for aarm strength and local boy story)
If the Patriots are going to trade down (and that looks more and more
like what's going to happen) the very first thing they should do is
tell the Seahawks that they're taking Bledsoe and then extort a player
or a 3rd-round pick not to do so. Then they can trade the #2 to one of
the teams clamoring for Mirer or Hearst. Basically, there should be a
fee for the mediator who's making sure everybody gets what they want...
glenn
|
56.204 | | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Thu Apr 22 1993 17:14 | 11 |
|
Nor does Seattle. They won't give up anything to move up 1 spot in the
draft. Especially a 3rd round pick. Remember they have close to as many holes
to fill as the Pats do (mostly on offense) and Flores intends to built an O-line
through the draft...
The Pats shouldn't trade down any lower than #4 or 5 in the first round. Any
lower than that an they don't get an impact player. And they desperatly need
an impact defensive or offensive lineman....
Metz
|
56.205 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 22 1993 17:52 | 8 |
|
Sure, Metz, but what will you be saying come Monday if Parcells is just
bluffing about trading down (or doesn't get the right offer) and goes
ahead and picks Bledsoe, and Seattle is left with your fave Mirer? I
know I'll be happy... ;-)
glenn
|
56.206 | | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Thu Apr 22 1993 18:00 | 17 |
|
I'll be pissed as all hell and I'll be ranting and raving about how Mirer is
a stiff and he'll be another Kelley Stouffer and the Qb equivalent of Bosworth
and they shouldda asked for Krieg back from the Chiefs and drafted Jones
instead of that stiff Mirer. :-)
But I have a feeling that Parcells has made his mind to either trade the pick
or to draft mirer...My guess is that he'll trade the pick..I just hope he drafts
better than the Agnew/Singleton type player.
Heck he's got 5 Qb's all ready. WWWwwhat's he need with another one?
Bledsoe to Martin....Touchdown !
Metz
|
56.207 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney! | Fri Apr 23 1993 12:27 | 10 |
| Hey Tommy Brydie, this week's S.I. has an article about our
studmeister linebacker from Florida State. Guess he impressed all the
voyeur scouts with his bench press, vertical leap and all the other stuff
that doesn't measure if the guy can actually play football. S.I.'s DoctorZ
(who knows as much about football as Al Bundy does about satisfying a woman)
has Jones going to the Jesters with the third pick. Sure hope that Mirer
doesn't turn about to be John Huarte, but if past Patriot history is any
indication...
/Don
|
56.208 | First Round of the draft.... | SNAX::ERICKSON | The snow has melted, time to tee off! | Sun Apr 25 1993 21:00 | 43 |
|
Here is what I have for the first round. I think Parsalls had
everybody confused, but made the right choice.
Pats - Drew Bledsoe QB Washington St.
Seahawks - Rick Mirer QB Notre Dame
Phoenix* - Garrison Hearst RB Georgia - Swapped with Jets, plus
gave up Johny Johnson RB to the Jets.
Jets - Marvin Jones LB Florida St.
Bengals - Eric Curry DL Alabama
Tampa Bay - William Roaf OL NE Louisiana
Bears - Curtis Conway WR USC
Saints* - John Copeland DL Alabama - Traded LB Pat Swilling to
Lions for the 8th pick
Atlanta - Lincoln Kennedy OL Washington
Rams - Jerome Bettis FB Notre Dame
Denver* - Dan Williams DL Toledo - Swapped 14th pick plus with
Cleveland
Raiders - Patrick Bates DB Texas A&M
Houston* - Brad Hopkins OL Illinois - Swapped 19th pick plus with
Philadelphia
Cleveland - Steve Everit C Michigan
Green Bay - Wayne Simmons LB Clemson
Colts - Sean Dawkins WR California
Washington - Tom Carter DB Notre Dame
Phoenix* - Ernest Dye OL South Carolina - Swapped 20th pick plus
with 49'ers
Eagles - Lester Holmes OL Jackson St.
Saints* - Irv Smith TE Notre Dame - Swapped 26th pick plus
with 49'ers
Minnesota - Robert Smith RB Ohio St.
San Diego - Darien Gordon CB Stanford
Pittsburgh - Deon Figures DB Colorado
Philadelphia - Leonard Renfro DT Colorodo
Miami - O.J. McDuffie WR Penn St.
San Francisco - Dana Stubblefield DL Kansas
San Francisco - Todd Kelly DL
Buffalo - Thomas Smith DB North Carolina
Green Bay* - George Teague - Traded picks to Dallas
/Ron
|
56.209 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | ABP | Mon Apr 26 1993 02:04 | 4 |
| also a good move by the Jets
The Crazy Met
|
56.211 | Quick send some Lacquer to GroundChuck!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | The idea that nothing matters... | Mon Apr 26 1993 08:24 | 0 |
56.212 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is crawling!!! | Mon Apr 26 1993 10:26 | 7 |
| re:Jets
Don't know much about Johnny Jones, but it seems to me that Phoenix got took.
All the talk I heard was that the Jets wanted Marvin Jones anyway, so the
Cards gave up a player for nothing.
=Bob=
|
56.213 | Drew da main! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Apr 26 1993 10:58 | 1 |
|
|
56.214 | woops, should be re: .212 - feel better Tommy? | METSNY::francus | ABP | Mon Apr 26 1993 11:21 | 12 |
|
re: .214
The Cardinals had the problem that the Jets were talking to other teams
that were likely to take Hearst with the 3rd pick. So Phoenix gave up
a RB, and got into position to take the RB they wanted.
This is similar to a suggestion made in this notesfile about what the Pats
could have done with Seattle if the Pats were going to take Mirer. Good
move in taking Bledsoe.
The Crazy Met
|
56.215 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Mon Apr 26 1993 12:12 | 3 |
| I thought the Pats already had 4-6 QB's? Trades coming?
t Tim
|
56.217 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Boston Broons� - JuggerNOT | Mon Apr 26 1993 13:48 | 8 |
| The Jests must've been trying to sell the "we're taking Hearst
or trading the pick to someone who will" bait and Phoenix took it
hook, line and sinker. Jesters still get their man and a running
back to boot. You got to love ESPN's DraftCam. Nothing like seeing
a bunch of executives in suits and ties using the telephone to really
bring home the total "draft experience" to the audience.
/Don
|
56.218 | Hey Glen..I'm angry... | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Mon Apr 26 1993 15:12 | 35 |
|
The Seachokes are putting a good face on about not getting Bledsoe. They make
no bones about the fact that would have prefered Bledsoe but are content in
getting Mirer.
Personally I'm bummed because I think that Bledsoe is a QB that will do things
on the field that have yet to be done. He's a true franchise Qb that , if given
the chance, will do spectacular things. I don't think that Parcells offensive
scheme that he used on the Giants will let him showcase his ability at all.
Having a Bledsoe throw 20 times a game is a major waste of talent. It's like
putting a Marino on the bears. I suspect that in 3-4 years either Parcells will
have to open up his game plan a little more or Bledsoe won't be a happy camper.
Mirer, on the other hand would have been content to throw 25 times a game as
long as the team was winning. I think the Seahquacks will throw him into the
fire this season and ask him to throw a ton downfield. His college stats
seem to indicate that he's abetter qb when he throws less. The Seachokes are
saying that he will compete with dan McGwire for the starting qb slot but if he
can't beat out Dan "rooted to the ground like an oak" McGwire than Mirer was
a wasted pick. Hopefully Flores will tailor the offense around Mirer's
strengths and design a lot of rollout and short pass plays to John L. and
Blades and Martin. Asking him to sit in the sievelike Seattle pocket and throw
downfield is a sure ticket to an injured QB by game 4.
All in all I'd say the NE got a true franchise QB but the hawks did O.K. by
meeting a need in drafting Mirer. I would have been happier if they had filled
the QB need through free agency (Burlein) and drafted Marvin Jones instead but
they needed a QB and they got one.
Did Toretta get drafted? I know that Billy Joe Hobert went to the faiders and
Brunell went somewhere today...
Metz
|
56.219 | | METSNY::francus | ABP | Mon Apr 26 1993 15:16 | 11 |
|
Bob Griese was a QB who did just fine throwing 20 times a game. He
probably could have done a lot more if the game plane had him throwing
35 times a game. If New England wins I'm not sure anyone, including
Bledsoe, will complain. If they are losing everyone will complain about
everything.
That being saidI can see Bledsoe being a franchise type player, much harder
to see Mirer being that kind of QB.
The Crazy Met
|
56.220 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'd have had to miss the dance | Mon Apr 26 1993 16:18 | 15 |
| >Having a Bledsoe throw 20 times a game is a major waste of talent. It's like
>putting a Marino on the bears. I suspect that in 3-4 years either Parcells will
>have to open up his game plan a little more or Bledsoe won't be a happy camper.
A lot of Parcells game plan with the Giants was dictated by the fact that
a lot of their season is played outdoors in the cold. A good solid
running game, with high percentage passes thrown in when needed will
be the way to go.
However, if the Pats end up with a new stadium, with a dome, then I'd
bet Parcells opens it up a little more.
'Saw
|
56.223 | Cruel man Cruel!!!! ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | The idea that nothing matters... | Mon Apr 26 1993 16:37 | 13 |
|
> Never mind the fact that Parcells simply never had a QB with Bledsoe's
> supposed talent. Can't fire a weapon you don't have.
Simms is loaded with talent Tommy, it's the receivers that we're
and still are suspect for the Giants. When a Bavaro leads you're team in
receiving your wide receivers aren't gettin the job done.....JAYYYDEEEE
has the numbers not me but Simms has HOF numbers and has played on a
running team....
mike
|
56.224 | Attitude problem! Looks like the Pats got the right guy ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Apr 26 1993 16:41 | 8 |
|
Saw a quote from Rick Mirer in today's paper that he really wasn't all
that thrilled with the East Coast anyway. Another Elway! Tell it to
all those eastern real and subway ND alums who wanted to see you in
Foxborough, Rick...
glenn
|
56.225 | | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Mon Apr 26 1993 16:43 | 10 |
|
Do you really think Parcells will open up his offense?
I think he'll stick with what has brought him success....A huge O-line, some
good rb's that don't fumble and an excellent defense...
The problem is that the Pat's currently have none of the above...
Metz
|
56.227 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'd have had to miss the dance | Mon Apr 26 1993 17:22 | 26 |
| The mark of a good coach is to work with the talent you have.
If you want my HONEST opinion, the Broncos had a wide-open, devil-may-care
offense in 1986. The Gaints made Pat Roberston looked like an ultra-left-wing
liberal with their offense.
The Giants won the Super Bowl and their first Champeenship in 30
years. Was I complaining about their conservative offense? Was I?
Not on your life.
I'd posit that not one of you Pats fans would utter one peep of complaint
if Bill could bring the Lombardi trophy home to Foxboro, if he ran 85%
of the time, and only threw to the TE and RB the rest of the time.....
8^)
'Saw
PS I have a GREAT poster of the Patriettes that'll soon be up on
my office wall.....
|
56.228 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Apr 26 1993 17:30 | 12 |
|
A great QB can be great in any NFL offense these days. Don't confuse
quantity (stats) with quality in the context of the chosen offensive
scheme. *No* team can just almost exclusively run the ball and win.
*Every* team needs a QB who can make big plays. There will be plenty
of opportunity in the future (not this year) for Mr. Bledsoe to make a
winning impact, even if he's only throwing just 20 times/game in bad
weather conditions (the other QB has to perform and perform well in
that bad weather, too, even if both suffer statistically).
glenn
|
56.229 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Tue Apr 27 1993 07:45 | 3 |
| Ha ha, love your comment about Perkins and his hair, Tommie! :*)
Lee
|
56.230 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Apr 27 1993 16:20 | 12 |
| QB Hugh Millen was traded to Dallas for an undisclosed 1994 draftpick.
The biggest problem with the Pats' O-line is their age. They are all
young and all thrown into the fray at about the same time. As they
mature you'll see them get better. And as Tommy said, the Pats have
quality RBs (as displayed by their ability to trade away Stephens) and
a decent defense.
Times are changing. Free agency allows teams to aquire veteran talent
for the short term and use the draft for the long term. At least
that's the theory. Let's see how long it takes the Foxborough Faithful
to boo Secules off the field in favor of Bledsoe.
|
56.231 | | MKFSA::LONG | If you get there before I do | Tue Apr 27 1993 16:36 | 8 |
|
Just out of curiosity, what do yunz think the order of play will
be for the Pat's qb?
My guess to start the season: Zolak, Secules then Bledsoe.
billl
|
56.232 | Aikman money?? | METSNY::francus | ABP | Tue Apr 27 1993 16:40 | 5 |
|
With the new salary cap in effect for rookies how will Bledsoes
contract be structured??
The Crazy Met
|
56.233 | probably not too shabby..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:03 | 10 |
|
Yabbut my $0.02 says Bledsoe's gonna get a total package of someplace
between $17M-$20M for 4 years.
Anybody else care to speculate?
I remain,
thinking that's about the right range
Kev
|
56.234 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:07 | 3 |
| I thought that rookies can't go over 2 mil a year?.?.?
Tim
|
56.235 | | METSNY::francus | ABP | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:11 | 7 |
|
Right. No team can spend more than 2 million per year TOTAL on rookies,
hence the question of how a contract will be structured. They presumably
can structure it so it is 1 million for Bledsoe's first year, and then
much larger sums for the other years.
The Crazy Met
|
56.236 | Steinberg v. Parcells could really set off some sparks | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:50 | 14 |
|
> Right. No team can spend more than 2 million per year TOTAL on rookies,
> hence the question of how a contract will be structured.
Actually the rookie cap is supposed to be on a graded scale, with the
teams drafting at the top allowed more money. The current basis
reflects the contracts offered after the last draft, roughly
maintaining the status quo but putting an end to the massive inflation
that has occurred with draft picks. Whether or not this will be
acceptable to Mr. Bledsoe remains to be seen. All I can say is, beware
Dick Steinberg, the roughest, toughest hombre agent in the land...
glenn
|
56.237 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel, but no Intel inside | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:15 | 4 |
| Are there any provisions for teams that have more 1st round draft
picks? This could hurt a team that astockpiles picks.
brews
|
56.238 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:32 | 9 |
|
> Are there any provisions for teams that have more 1st round draft
> picks? This could hurt a team that astockpiles picks.
I think the pay scale depends on the actual picks you have, not some
pre-fixed amount...
glenn
|
56.239 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Det. Teamsters:92-93 DEChoop champs | Wed Apr 28 1993 13:46 | 6 |
| Depends on number of picks, and where they are. Bledsoe would get more
than say Deon Figures.
Gino got drafted in the 7th round by Minnesota. Around the same time
as pre-season Heismann candidate, Elvis Grbac.
|
56.240 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Boston Broons� - JuggerNOT | Wed Apr 28 1993 17:37 | 4 |
| Patriot's draft? It costs too much ($3.75 for a 12 oz. cup)
and it's usually warm.
/Don
|
56.241 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | My minds just not in it | Wed Apr 28 1993 22:44 | 10 |
|
>> Patriot's draft? It costs too much ($3.75 for a 12 oz. cup)
>>and it's usually warm.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
At least it cools down in the pipes on the way from the urinals in the
men's room.
JaKe
|
56.242 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Fri Jun 18 1993 13:28 | 6 |
| No comment on this morning's stabbing of Leonard Russell and Tim
Edwards? Any update's on Russell's condition? Edwards was released ad
Russell (per WBZ this AM) was in serious condition in Intensive Care at
Mass General.
Mark.
|
56.243 | | USCTR1::KING | Key West, where the fun begins....... | Fri Jun 18 1993 13:35 | 3 |
| At noon they hade Russell still in serious condition...
Rick
|
56.244 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I can't tell you why... | Fri Jun 18 1993 13:50 | 2 |
| What's there to comment about?
|
56.245 | | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Fri Jun 18 1993 13:57 | 5 |
|
Heard something on the radio this AM about it. Wha' happened?
MikeL
|
56.246 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 18 1993 14:00 | 4 |
| � No comment on this morning's stabbing of Leonard Russell and Tim
� Edwards?
Of course not. Irving Fryar wasn't involved.
|
56.247 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I can't tell you why... | Fri Jun 18 1993 14:28 | 4 |
| They were talking to some women outside the Harbor Club when some guys
looked to start a discussion. Words were exchanged and Russell was
allegedly stabbed by one of the two suspects. The other was stabbed
trying to break up the fight.
|
56.248 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:29 | 3 |
| I see Lowell Weiker wants to put all of those income tax dollars to
work. He is supposed to meet with Fran Murray, former minority owner
of the Pats, today to discuss a domed stadium in the Hartford area.
|
56.249 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:35 | 20 |
| > I see Lowell Weiker wants to put all of those income tax dollars to
> work. He is supposed to meet with Fran Murray, former minority owner
> of the Pats, today to discuss a domed stadium in the Hartford area.
See the NFL note.
There is supposed to be a news conference today with an announcement.
The one thing I know about ol' Lowell is that he doesn't even take a dump
without having a plan, and there's got to have been a lot of groundwork
done on this.
It'll be interesting to see what's what.
'Saw
PS If it's true, watch for our income tax rate to JUMP way up. 8^(
|
56.251 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:51 | 10 |
| Worcester to Hartford is about 45-60 minutes, about the same as going
to Foxborough. Moving to Hartford put it closer to the second or 3rd
largest city in New England -- Springfield. If they don't think about
highway acess when locating the stadium, the traffic could be worse
than Route 1. Hartford is a pain to get through as it is. The 91/84
interchange is a nightmare as it is now.
I think they are getting a little too close to Giants territory if they
move it there, though. Besides, it will cost the Pats a fortune to
break their current lease.
|
56.252 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:55 | 7 |
| Boston-Hartford is about 90 minutes - going 70MPH on the Pike; if
stadium traffic needs to be included it would mean at least 2 hours
from Boston. Quite a way to go. I mean this is the Pats we're talkinmg
about not a Bruce Springsteen concert.
The Crazy Met
|
56.253 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:05 | 22 |
| 84/91 is improving.
As it is right now it's 100% better than it was, but it's still under
construction.
I don't believe Weicker is tilting at windmills, if only for the fact that
he doesn't usually work that way. Don't get me wrong -- I hate the guy,
but he doesn't do stuff without lots of groundwork in place. I believe he's
serious about making a serious bid for the Pats. Whether or not he gets
it, is another thing
If they put it east of the river, then access becomes less of a problem
because that area is not as congested, and you don't hit the 84/91 interchange.
As to Giants territory, the Hartford area is pretty much split. I'll watch
the Pats if nothing else is going on, but I am a Giants fan.
It'll be interesting to see what the man has up his sleeve.
'Saw
|
56.254 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:09 | 8 |
| �As it is right now it's 100% better than it was, but it's still under
�construction.
It's been under construction since I can remember (and I grew up out
that way).
In one way, moving to Hartford would be better for the Boston area.
That would put Boston outside the TV blackout zone.
|
56.255 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:14 | 7 |
|
I also don't see Hartford supporting anything less than a solid,
winning, suuitable-for-bandwagon-jumping Patriots' football team.
So where's the payoff?
glenn
|
56.256 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:49 | 41 |
| 84/91 has always been under construction, true, but they have recently (last
two years) totally revamped about 3/4 of the interchange. It's way better
than what was there before.
>
> I also don't see Hartford supporting anything less than a solid,
> winning, suuitable-for-bandwagon-jumping Patriots' football team.
> So where's the payoff?
>
Want my cut at it?
Due to an intense lobbying effort, along with buy-in from the Mashintucket(sp)
Indian tribe, Weicker defeated the proposed Casino plan -- THIS year.
The casino folks will be back in record numbers next year to try and push
casino gambling in Hartford/Bridgeport through again.
In effect, what Weicker did was say no to about 22K direct and indirect
jobs from those casinos.
My thinking is that this is his clincher to kill off the casino gambling
question for next year.
If he can get buy-in, approval whatever, to build a domed stadium, then
he's got all sorts of possibilities for sports, including wooing the
Pawsox away from Pawtucket, the Patriots possibility, UCONN playing
Division I football etc etc etc. (A few years ago, the Red Sox were thinking
of switching their AAA and AA ball clubs because of fan response in this
area -- I don't know if it is still the case.)
It creates jobs -- direct and indirect, and when the question of the casino
comes up again, he's in a much better position to defeat it.
That's just me trying to get inside his head. I could be completely wrong.
'saw
|
56.257 | Murray made Orthwein an offer | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 12:16 | 18 |
| Subject: Ever unstable Patriots on the move?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 93 21:25:47 PDT
HARTFORD, Conn. (UPI) -- Fran Murray, former part-owner of the New
England Patriots, Tuesday made an offer to buy the troubled franchise
and said he would keep the team in New England but wouldn't commit to
Massachusetts.
Murray's offer to current owner James Orthwein -- who intends to bring
NFL football back to St. Louis with an expansion team -- was made on the
eve of a news conference Murray is scheduled to hold 10 a.m. EDT
Wednesday in Hartford with Connecticut Gov. Lowell Weicker. Weicker will
apparently announce plans to build a major sports complex for the
Patriots.
Murray has been trying for some time to develop a major sports and
convention complex in the Boston area for the Patriots, who play in
Foxboro. Orthwein has repeatedly stated his intention to eventually sell
the Patriots and buy into an expansion team in St. Louis.
|
56.259 | No offense 'Saw, but screw Ct. | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:10 | 13 |
| Putting aside the bidness aspect...
How many Ct people are Pats fans?? I dunno, I heard it's no more than
20%( much less than the 50% deemed to be BoSox fans).
So this move would alienate 80% of their fan base ( EMASS, some of
CMASS, RI, NH) in order to attract WMass, Vt and some Ct fans?
If the Pats move to Ct., sorry, but my ass roots for someone else
(Jints?)
MikeL
|
56.260 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:20 | 9 |
| CT are fains of who is winning. The last year the Giants won the
Super Bowl every car with a CT license plate had folks in there wearing
brand new Giants apparel. Last year there were tons of Miami CT fans
wearing brand new Dolphin apparel at Foxboro. Hey 'Saw I would've
never supported a dime of my tax money going to the Patriots, but since
it's *your* tax dollars, what the hell. FWIW, Denny, Chap and I would
still go to the games as long as there is tailgating.
/Don
|
56.261 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:24 | 6 |
| � That would seem to be another strike against moving out that way.
� Why would Bostonians drive two hours to see the Pats when they can
� stay home and watch them?
TV ratings are better than attendance figures because TV is where the
money is.
|
56.262 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:27 | 11 |
| � So this move would alienate 80% of their fan base ( EMASS, some of
� CMASS, RI, NH) in order to attract WMass, Vt and some Ct fans?
I don't think they'd alienate anyone in CMass if they moved to
Hartford.
� If the Pats move to Ct., sorry, but my ass roots for someone else
� (Jints?)
Let's see, if the Pats moved farther away from you, you'd root for a
team that is even farther away?
|
56.263 | The Hartford Traitors 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:39 | 17 |
| -1
Yabbut Mac, IMO they would alienate a majority of their fans from
Woostah ( well Framingham ) in. Don't you think the majority of
season tix holders and frequent attendees are from east of Woostah?
Sorry, but the Pats would be thumbing their nose at a vast % of their
supporters if they went to Haarfa. I'd just do the same to them.
Hey it's pro football, it's not like it's religion like college
football! I dunno, again apologies to 'Saw, but I just don't
consider Ct. as an integral part of NE. Kinda like a crossroads.
MikeL
|
56.264 | | DECWET::METZGER | This is the song that never ends. | Wed Jun 30 1993 14:19 | 15 |
|
The only group I think they would lose would be the southern N.H contingent.
If they located the stadium on the east side of the river about 20 mins east
of haarfaa then the drive from boston wouldn't be bad at all. If they
designed a stadium with easy in and out access then the round trip time would
probably be faster than foxboro.
Haarfaa would clean up on speeding tickets down 84 as well.
Of course the Pats would have to change their name to the Fighting Insurance
Salesmen and their newly designed logo would have to be changed to a guy in
a 3 piece suit carrying a briefcase leaping over a dog with pen in hand
trying the sell another policy.
Metz
|
56.265 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 16:02 | 3 |
| Pats move to Haafaad??
Party at the Sawmill!!
|
56.266 | Will Be intresting, but why a Dome, Just a Bigger Nicer Stadium | MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKS | | Wed Jun 30 1993 16:04 | 8 |
| I guess if they look at the past 3-5 years attendences they can risk
moving to CT ? How many seats would be empty in this dome :-),
if its too big the pats may never see a sell out. Of course if they
get a good deal on playing in this dome maybe they can afford to pay
there players more $$$ and produce a winning team :-) ya buy a
contender that's the ticket :-)
MaB
|
56.268 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 30 1993 16:58 | 11 |
| �How long do you
� think it will be before most of the marginal Pats fans start tuning out.
But Tommy, since they haven't been selling out folks in Boston haven't
been able to watch them anyway due to the blackout rule.
�If the Pats move to Hartford they'll be the Hartford,
� Connecticut Patriots not the New England Patriots.
If anything they will stop being the Boston Patriots and be closer to
the New England Patriots.
|
56.269 | NFL blackout rule is not federal law... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:05 | 16 |
|
� How long do you
� think it will be before most of the marginal Pats fans start tuning out.
>
> But Tommy, since they haven't been selling out folks in Boston haven't
> been able to watch them anyway due to the blackout rule.
Exactly. That's a very simple problem to fix. If TV money is more
important to the NFL than paid attendance, then the blackout rule can
be dumped. Even now the individual teams can waive the rule if they
want, if the TV money issue is deemed more important than the marginal
gate receipts. No sense in taking the drastic step of moving the team
just so more people in Boston can watch on TV.
glenn
|
56.270 | must be that migration to parts elsewhere... | DECWET::METZGER | This is the song that never ends. | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:13 | 6 |
|
I thought you people thought that Boston was the hub of the universe?
I'm amazed that it's fallen to just the hub of New England...
Metz
|
56.272 | | RUGBY1::way | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:53 | 27 |
| The Connecticut rap as a "crossroads" is ill-deserved and shows
a major lack of knowledge of New England history as well as a superficial
look at what CT really is.
I've lived here all my life and I can you you sites with as much historical
impact and importance as any place in the rest of New England. The rap
as a crossroads comes mainly from two things: a) proximity to New York and
the abundance of folks in Greenwich County who work in New York, and b)
Hartford as an insurance center.
But do a little digging, go down to Chester and ride the ferry, go to
South Glastonbury or any part of Old Wethersfield and I'll show you as much
history and "New England" as anywhere east of 495.
I get tired of hearing that rap, because I come from old New England stock,
and not the yuppified, suit-wearing, beemer driving weinerheads who work
in Hartford. My father's side of the family can trace his roots back past
1700 in this area.
Personally, from a CT point of view I think it's great that they're trying
to go after the Patriots. I don't think they'll get them, and I think that
some of the reasons for trying are what I put in earlier, but you can't fault
them for trying.....
'SAw
|
56.273 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:56 | 4 |
| So Hartford will have 2 teams renowned for their losing ways.
The Crazy Met
|
56.274 | Why I hate Connecticut, by ACC Chris | RHETT::KNORR | Dean > Wooden | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:12 | 17 |
| Top 10 Things John Q. Public Knows About Connecticut
====================================================
1. I-95
2. Traffic jams on I-95
3. Toll booths on I-95
4. The bridge that collapsed on I-95
5. The truck driver who barreled thru the toll booth on I-95
6. Can't use my radar detector on I-95
7. Outrageously high speeding fines on I-95
8. Perpectual road construction on I-95
9. Car needs an alignment after driving on I-95
10. No matter how slow that trucker's goin' cain't pass on the right
on I-95
- ACC Chris
|
56.275 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:28 | 17 |
| > Top 10 Things John Q. Public Knows About 1% of Connecticut
> ==========================================================
Anyone who lives in CT knows to avoid I95 like the plague. Unless you
wanna rub elbows with folks from Greenwich county.
Folks who've been to the Sawmill have seen some of the pretty areas
of CT. I'd take a small plot of land over a mansion in Fairfield County
anyday.
PS Earlier I referred to it as "Greenwich County". By rights it's
Fairfield County, but a lot of us refer to it by the name of the
town our Fat Fascist Governor is from.....
|
56.276 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Geez, the METS sure do STINK!! | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:36 | 15 |
|
>> New England IS the universe. Ya dad-gummed furriner.
Ya fergot how it REALLY goes, Tommy.
Here's how it should be:
New England IS the BUTT of the universe. And, Boston is the
sphincter.
Schnorttt SChittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
56.277 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | To walk the caves of ice | Wed Jun 30 1993 19:27 | 3 |
| Domes are fur sissies!
Tim
|
56.278 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Wed Jun 30 1993 20:32 | 6 |
| re: .274
btw law changed and you can use a radar detector in CT.
The Crazy Met
|
56.279 | | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Wed Jun 30 1993 22:38 | 26 |
| 'Saw,
As I said, my apologies regarding the "crossroads" thang, as it is
based on perception and ignorance on Ct. history, but it would be a
travesty, IMO, if the Pats moved to Ct and tried to pass it off as
NE Pats, no matter what Mac says. OK, so I'll accede to you and
intellectually say that Ct is NE, but emotionally I won't. FWIW,\
the perception is out there because of the reasons you state, 'Saw,
that CT is half and half ( dat's admittedly provincial Boston area
bias) and I cain't accept a NE Pats team in Ct. Hartford whatever but
not NE Pats. 'Saw, you sum up what most people percieve about Ct;
50/50 Bosox/Yank fans, majority Jint fans; quasi-NE/quasi-NY, history
notwithstanding.
And as Tommy said Mac, Boston is the Hub and media center of NE, not
Hartford, Woostah, Springfield etc. It that's provincial, so be it.
Ya thinn NooYawkas would be pleased to see the Yanks move to Ithaca
cuz it's mo' "New York"?.
So 'Saw, nothing against CT in this endeavor, it's the Pats who would
be
the ogre in this matter if they move. And likle Tommy, I don't think
they'll venture 30 miles outside Beantown if/when they move.
MikeL
|
56.280 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Thu Jul 01 1993 08:32 | 5 |
| HAHAHAHAHAHAHA� What a joke of a press conference. I was waiting
for Weicker or Murray to say "pay no attention to that man behind the
curtain".
/Don
|
56.281 | | CAM3::WAY | I got a stiffie | Thu Jul 01 1993 08:42 | 43 |
| > btw law changed and you can use a radar detector in CT.
Actually, you always could. 8^)
That law was only enforced on a spotty basis, and there were lots of
ways around it, if caught with one.
The one and only time I got nabbed it cost me $40, and when the trooper
said to me "It's illegal to have these you know, and it's gonna cost
you $40" I replied "First off, the constitutionality of the illegality of
owning and operating a device to receive radio signals is open to question.
Second off, I figure this baby has easily saved me $1500 worth of tickets,
so I'm still $1100 ahead of the game".
I thought he was gonna blow a gasket.
re Mike:
I hear what you're saying, but it still rankles me that folks just
trash the area without having checked it out. Actually, the split
of Yankee/Sox fans in the area has always made things really interesting,
and sparked many a coffee-shop or pub debate. And most "Connecticut"
folks, don't believe that Fairfield County is part of Connecticut, no
matter what the map says....8^)
re /Don:
I didn't see the press conference. I was in this dump until 7:30.
The reaction around here is "Where can I sign up for season tickets".
The only thing I see bad about it might be that Giants telecasts might be
affected....
'Saw
|
56.282 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Thu Jul 01 1993 08:45 | 7 |
| Hey 'Saw, hold off on the season tickets. Murray will pay 133
million for the team, but can't say where the money is coming from and
the only thing solid about the stadium is the cardboard that the
picture of it is on. The Boston media is having a field day with this
one.
/Don
|
56.283 | | ROYALT::ASHE | STOP! You're bendin' the shafts!!! | Thu Jul 01 1993 09:09 | 4 |
| So you can use a detector in CT now?
Is the stadium going to be near the mall with the fake ATM?
|
56.284 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Thu Jul 01 1993 09:16 | 24 |
| re /Don:
Well, I wouldn't expect the Boston media to be sitting around
with the thumbs up their arses. Of course they're having a
field day. But stranger things have happened, and it sure will
be interesting to see what kind of spin control they use if the
Pats DO move.
> So you can use a detector in CT now?
Yep, have been able to legally since last October, but seriously, I've
always used one.
> Is the stadium going to be near the mall with the fake ATM?
Not from what they're talking about. They're looking at site
in Colt Park or near Brainard airport (not Bradley, Brainard on the
southeast side of Harfaa)
'Saw
|
56.285 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:04 | 5 |
| I always used a radaar detector in CT as well; got caught speeding
once but managed to hide the detector before the cop came over.
The crazy Met
|
56.286 | Truth be told I'd rather spend the day in Maine | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:16 | 12 |
|
While this New England cultural discussion is all very interesting, the
fact of the matter is that football has never been a big part of the
New England cultural landscape anyway. I still think it'd be dumb to
base the region's football team in Hartford, for logistical reasons.
Connecticut may be every bit as much New England as Maine, but I
wouldn't want to see the Patriots based out of Portland, either. And
for most people living north of Boston as opposed to south it'd be no
less convenient.
glenn
|
56.287 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:37 | 10 |
| >> the fact of the matter is that football has never been a big
>> part of the New England cultural landscape anyway.
Tell that to the thousands who bought season tickets after Parcells
was announced as the new head coach. A successful NFL franchise will
sell just about anywhere but to really cash in on all of the peripheral
goodies the team *has* to be located in Boston.
BTW - 'Saw, Georgia has a rich colonial history and it ain't New
England either.
|
56.288 | "Can you imagine Jim Nance in a Hartford uniform?" doesn't compare | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:42 | 17 |
|
>> the fact of the matter is that football has never been a big
>> part of the New England cultural landscape anyway.
>
> Tell that to the thousands who bought season tickets after Parcells
> was announced as the new head coach. A successful NFL franchise will
> sell just about anywhere but to really cash in on all of the peripheral
> goodies the team *has* to be located in Boston.
Oh, I agree. For financial reasons especially it'd be best if in the
team is in the region's largest city. All I was saying is that I don't
think the Patriots in Connecticut would be the cultural travesty
that a Nashua NH Red Sox would be. Or a Providence RI Celtics. Hell,
having Foxborough for an identity is bad enough...
glenn
|
56.290 | | RUGBY1::way | I got a stiffie | Thu Jul 01 1993 10:58 | 15 |
| Tommy,
Perhaps I didn't express myself as clearly as I would have liked.
I'm not saying that Colonial history makes it New England, but I'm talking
about that for a start. There are very definite things in Connecticut
that ARE New England in addition to a colonial history. The farms, the
people and their traditions.
Granted, I'll give you Fairfield County (you can have it 8^)) isn't New England,
but the rest of the state is, from the Northwest corner to the Southeast
shore (excluding Fairfield County).....
'Saw
|
56.291 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | Agassi - the Hairless wonder... | Thu Jul 01 1993 11:13 | 5 |
| No more toll booths on I-95 right? Radar detectors? Just drive around the speed
limit and you don't need one. Never have gotten a speeding ticket in CT. Radar
Dectectors are for weinies.
JD
|
56.293 | | RUGBY1::way | I got a stiffie | Thu Jul 01 1993 11:46 | 8 |
| I drive around 70, which is what everyone else is driving...
Right, no tolls on I95 in CT, no tolls anywhere in CT any more. It took
a couple of major 18-wheeler-crushes-car-with-young-mother-and-baby type
accidents, but they finally got rid of them....
'Saw
|
56.294 | | RUGBY1::way | I got a stiffie | Thu Jul 01 1993 11:49 | 17 |
| Okay, Tommy.
Anyway, you should come down some weekend and check out the Mark Twain
and Harriet Beecher Stowe houses in Hartford, along with the Wadsworth
Atheneum.
Old Newgate Prison is a rush too -- all underground (from colonial times)
and some of the passages off the tour route are clearly marked "pass at your
own risk".
Gillette Castle, built by the late 19th, early 20th century actor,
William Gillette is also fun, especially at Christmas time, when it's done
up a la Victorian Christmas...
your CT tour guide,
'Saw
|
56.296 | Insert youknowwhat | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Thu Jul 01 1993 12:56 | 5 |
| HAHAHA
This from someone from Clinton??
MikeL
|
56.298 | | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:12 | 25 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.297 The Unofficial New England Patriots Note 297 of 297
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" 5 lines 1-JUL-1993 12:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I'll have you know, Leary that Clinton is the cultural and political
>> center of the quad-town area (Clinton, Sterling, Lancaster and Bolton).
Now there's a downright scary development. Don't tell me... you're
chairman of "The Quad-town Apple-picking festival" and guru of the
"County grass growing fest"
And Heiser left this beacon of renaissance for staid Arizona
>> If you weren't so busy writing checks to Notre Dame football players
>> you'd know that.
Checks aren't allowed. Cash in big brown bags preferred. No smoking
guns you see....
MikeL
|
56.299 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Happy 30th ZIP | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:41 | 8 |
| Hey Tommy if they Pats move into a sissified domed MegaHypePlex
near the waterfront they can take my season tickets and stick 'em where
the sun don't shine. It would be faster getting in and out of Hartford
than going through Boston every Sunday. And if the developers get
their way the stadium will be smack dab in the middle of a mall meaning
no more tailgating. 8^(
/Don
|
56.301 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Wed Jul 07 1993 13:47 | 10 |
| The New England (MegaPlex) Patriots signed Drew Bledsoe to a six
year (MegaPlex) 14.5 million dollar contract. The only thing that could be
better (MegaPlex) was if those evil Massachusetts politicians would allow
the new (MegaPlex) stadium to be built. The Patriots will never be a
competitive (MegaPlex) team until they have a brand new (MegaPlex) domed
stadium, completely paid for by the state (MegaPlex). Lord knows that Mr.
Orthwein (MegaPlex) is doing everything in his power (MegaPlex) to bring
the fans of New England (MegaPlex) a winner.
/Don
|
56.302 | Subliminal advertising at its best! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Take me for a little while | Thu Jul 08 1993 10:59 | 6 |
| Thanks for the note about Bledsoe (MegaPlex), /Don. I didn't get the
(MegaPlex) message Orthwein was trying to get across at the press
conference (MegaPlex) to announce Bledsoe's signing. Thanks for
(MegaPlex) clarifying it for me.
NAZZ
|
56.303 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 08 1993 11:02 | 7 |
| I see ACChris knows as much about CT as he does about hoops outside of
Chapel Hill. And once again, everyone is asking, "who cares?".
�The only thing I see bad about it might be that Giants telecasts might be
�affected....
Don't worry. Giants (NFC) are on CBS, Pats (AFC) are on NBC.
|
56.304 | and the funniest comedians around... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lefty > Dean | Thu Jul 08 1993 11:17 | 7 |
|
but Mac you know how those TV exe's are. They just can't get enough of
Eddie Mac drooling over them there prospective models on the universally
appealing Star Search. Why I can't recall how many tears I've shed watching
5 year olds belt out them tunes....
mike
|
56.305 | Look for Orthwein's heir to be the next power figure | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 08 1993 11:31 | 10 |
|
That James Orthwein is a real bore, isn't he? He looked half-dead up
there at the podium, with that new designer Pats' cap propped up on his
head as if he'd never wore one before in his life. If they can stretch
this megaplex thing out long enough in the legislature, this threatened
move problem (as far as Orthwein personally is concerned) may take care
of itself...
glenn
|
56.306 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 08 1993 12:54 | 5 |
| �Not from what they're talking about. They're looking at site
�in Colt Park
Why do new stadia always seem to get situated in one of the worst parts
of town?
|
56.307 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Thu Jul 08 1993 13:13 | 5 |
| That's easy BigMac, real estate is cheaper. Now that my seats have
been "up"graded I hope the Pats stay in Foxboro. If they move Joes
like Denny, Chap and I will get "relocated" to the nosebleed section.
/Don
|
56.308 | | CAM3::WAY | We pruned the house too | Thu Jul 08 1993 14:30 | 12 |
| In addition to cheaper real estate, it's an area where there is a lot of
open space.
Since then, the site has been narrowed down, so to speak, to the
south meadows, an area near Brainard Airport and Hilltop Steakhouse
(which for years was Valle's Steak House).
That area is a fine area....
'Saw
|
56.309 | Pats for Sale | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 16 1993 12:10 | 23 |
|
[email protected] articles by Jul 15, 1993:
--------
Subject: Patriots for sale for $140 million
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 15:27:47 PDT
FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- The New England Patriots will be put up for
sale next month, the Boston Globe reported Wednesday.
The newspaper said Patriots owner James Orthwein is expected to start
entertaining offers for the team around Aug. 1. Orthwein is seeking at
least $140 million for the Patriots, the same price put on expansion
franchises by the NFL two months ago. Orthwein is involved with a group
looking to land an expansion team in St. Louis.
Orthwein purchased the Patriots last year from debt-laden Victor
Kiam. According to the Globe, Orthwein was prompted to put the Patriots
up for sale sooner than expected after the NFL announced it would hold a
special expansion meeting in September to receive the final
presentations from five cities vying for two expansion franchises.
If St. Louis is granted an expansion franchise, Orthwein would have
until February to complete the sale of the Patriots. St. Louis is
considered a front runner for an expansion team.
|
56.310 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | RealStoriesOfTheAnimalRescueLeague | Thu Jul 22 1993 13:34 | 5 |
| Denny and I are heading down to Smif'field this Monday to watch the
Pats groan and sweat under Parcell's whip. I'll put in a full report
nexted week.
/Don
|
56.311 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 30 1993 10:34 | 3 |
| More talk of the Boston Megaplex. Gov. Weld's plan is for the city of
Boston to kick in some money, the Pats to kick in some money, and the
rest will be funded via Boston Harbor gambling cruises.
|
56.312 | Actually I think it's a grand idea | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Fri Jul 30 1993 10:57 | 10 |
| Yippee!
I'd go on a gambling cruise..
"Hit me" as I pass the wonderful Deer Island sewage plant.
"Red 25" as I see kneecapped Vinny float by off the East Boston Piers.
"Where's the one-armed bandit" as I hear hordes of Boston-whalered
drunks make their way back to the Winthrop Yacht Club.
8^)
MikeL
|
56.313 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | YouAin'tPlayingWakeForestAnymore! | Mon Aug 02 1993 13:31 | 16 |
| Went down with Denny and Chap last Monday to the Patriots' training
camp in Smithfield. For those with a little free time I would recommend
the trip because watching Bill Parcells is worth the trip. This is
definitely *his* team and it will be run *his* way. There's nobody hanging
around or sitting on his helmet not paying attention. He runs a tight
practice with every minute of it filled. His tart one liners had us
rolling. During one scrimmage he yelled at Chris Slade "Slade, you've been
in camp two days and I've already caught you for five penalties. You ain't
playing Wake Forest!" Another gem was when Zolak was getting constantly
sacked in the afternoon scrimmage, "When there's nothing there, get rid of
the damned ball! No wonder you guys were sacked 57 times last year!" Like
I said, he's worth the trip down there. One free agent who looked
impressive was Corey Croom a free agent running back from Ball State. I
would think he'll get some playing time against the Chargers.
/Don
|
56.314 | G7 | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Wed Aug 04 1993 17:35 | 8 |
|
For those of you with satellite dishes who wish to watch the SD/NE
game on Saturday, it'll be on Galaxy 7, transponder unknown.
This has been a public service announcement.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
56.315 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Sgt.York,A.Murphy,RogerClemens | Thu Aug 05 1993 13:26 | 6 |
| � game on Saturday, it'll be on Galaxy 7
Hey Glenn, I thought the game was in San Diego? Now that's what I
call a road trip!!
/Don
|
56.316 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:37 | 7 |
|
Don, I've observed that sometimes the Chargers play better on alternate
galaxies. Has something to do with weightlessness and little martian
guys with ray guns that Bugs can really annoy. ;-)
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
<
|
56.317 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:42 | 5 |
|
G7, transponder 22
Live from Charger Central......Glenn
|
56.318 | Drag out the cheap UHF loop... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:50 | 9 |
|
> G7, transponder 22
Otherwise known to us mere mortals as planet earth, UHF channel 56...
;-)
glenn
|
56.319 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Fri Aug 06 1993 19:04 | 5 |
|
I guess that's true. I would have no idea about that tho.
Live from Charger Central......Glenn
|
56.320 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Mon Aug 30 1993 12:54 | 17 |
| Almost 50K for an exhibtion game? The Pats offense looks better
than I thought they would be but the defense is worse than I hoped they
would be. If the Chiefs had let Montana play 3 quarters they would've
scored 50 on the Pats' Keystone Cops defense. The only things that may
allow the team to win 5-7 games are the last place schedule and Parcells'
coaching because the defensive line and backfield are pathetic.
Traffic was at an absolute standstill on Rte 1 after the game and
it wasn't a whole lot better an hour later. How come it takes a guy from
Miami (Wierd Sam Jankovich) to get a decent traffic flow on a road in New
England? Last year I had to leave immediately after the 49er game (a
sellout) and was home in less than an hour and a half. Didn't get home
until almost one on Saturday morning! Anybody at the game see the skinhaid
security guard patrolling the visitor's sideline on Friday night? Tell me
he don't say a few Hail Adolphs when he gets up in the morning...
/Don
|
56.321 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Aug 30 1993 14:10 | 12 |
| re: da skin haid security guard
He was there lasted week too. In the third quarter a guy with "Supervisor"
on his shirt came over to talk with him. At that point all your friends in
the next section (the ones who harrass the cheerleaders) started to yell "tell
him he can smile, tell him to let his hair down". After a few minutes of this,
he took off the baseball cap he was wearing, ran his hand over his chrome dome,
and cracked a huge smile.
We were rollward.
=Bob=
|
56.322 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 31 1993 13:51 | 5 |
| Parcells says he'll be scouring the other teams' cuts to find a pass
rusher and a free safety.
Rumor has it there is a bidding war going on over the Pats. One of the
parties interested is Kraft, the owner of the stadium.
|
56.323 | has a few $$$ lying around I guess | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Tue Aug 31 1993 17:09 | 10 |
| Yabbut either lasted night or the night before, WBZ radion had a
interview with some guy who said he and his family are making a bid.
Don't remember his name but he's a native of da bahston area but now
lives in Hollywood. He is a movie producer and he said he'd like to
see a stadium build in/near the city.
I remain,
not remembering his name but he's 41 years old.
Kev
|
56.324 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Aug 31 1993 17:41 | 13 |
| re: .323
I forget the guys name also, but his uncle is Dick Smith, the president
of what is now Harcore General Corporation, but for years was know as
Gneral Cinema Corporation. Lasted week the rumor came out in the paper
that Smith was bidding, he denied it, but confirmed his nephew was.
As a former employee of General Cinema (no, I wasn't an usher, I wrote
softwqare for them), all I can say is betterPacells working for Di
Smith than me.
=Bob=
|
56.326 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:23 | 4 |
| As long as they don't play in a SissyDome I would travel to
Connecticut to see the Pats.
/Don
|
56.327 | | CAM3::WAY | The Last in Line | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:42 | 15 |
| > As long as they don't play in a SissyDome I would travel to
> Connecticut to see the Pats.
Talk here is of a real stadium, no dome.
That's just what I hear.
Connecticut folks are going "Pats in CT? We'll believe it when we see it"
BTW, the new logo SUCKS.
'Saw
|
56.329 | | CAM3::WAY | The Last in Line | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:09 | 17 |
| And as Tommy stated before there is pretty aparent unification among a lot
of factions to get this done.
For example, once it appeared that it would be feasible to do this, and
perhaps even likely, a bunch of folks from East Hartford tried to jump
on the bandwagon, and make a site available in East Hartford.
The site is Rentschler Field, the airfield on the ground of Pratt and
Whitney Aircraft, which Pratt is trying to sell off. It is 12 acres
of level ground.
However, the "powers that be" are really set on having this thing in
Hartford, to benefit all of the folks in downtown that would or could
benefit from this, not to mention the hotels and things....
'Saw
|
56.330 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:21 | 2 |
| Well, if the pols in Connecticut decided to bail out the Whalers, why
not take the Pats as well.
|
56.331 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:25 | 4 |
| Hey why not ask the state of Connecticut to donate some of their
tax dollars to Jacobs so he can sign Bourque?
/Don
|
56.332 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:36 | 4 |
| Let the Foxwood Indians purchase the team. They could include the
stadium in their casino expansion plan.
Weld wants to pay for the Megaplex with Boston Harbor gambling boats.
|
56.333 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Tue Sep 07 1993 15:37 | 13 |
| � Weld wants to pay for the Megaplex with Boston Harbor gambling boats.
Don't you just love it. Gambling on football games (where the
bettor actually has a chance to win) is a sickness but scratch tickets
(where the odds are long on winning anything substantial) is okay. Video
Poker (where you can apply strategy) is like "crack cocaine", but Keno
(another nobrainer longshot bet) is allowed. Now we want to have the
RobertCraneMemorialFloatingFixedCrapGame to pay for a SissyPlex. Why don't
some of these pols spend the night in a package store, or any lottery agent
the day welfare checks come in if they really want to see a "crack cocaine"
like addiction. What a bunch of phonies!
/Don
|
56.334 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 16:30 | 12 |
| I've had great luck on CT's new scratch game.
I bought two tickets last week, and won $2, and $50. I cashed the $2
and came up empty on the two more tickets I bought with it. I spent
the $50 on someone really special.
Then, the next time I bought two tickets I had a $10 winner.
6 tickets and I've won $62..... Not bad.
'Saw
|
56.335 | Sniffff | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Sep 07 1993 16:35 | 4 |
| �and came up empty on the two more tickets I bought with it. I spent
�the $50 on someone really special.
Yea, those flowers you sent me were so sweet...
|
56.336 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 16:42 | 10 |
| >Yea, those flowers you sent me were so sweet...
Dammit, =Bob=, you weren't supposed to tell anyone.
'Saw
|
56.337 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:10 | 6 |
|
After seeing the Pats new uniforms, it'd be hilarious for me
to catch any more flack 'bout *orange jersies* from a certain
noter. :*)
Claybone
|
56.338 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:12 | 16 |
| > After seeing the Pats new uniforms, it'd be hilarious for me
> to catch any more flack 'bout *orange jersies* from a certain
> noter. :*)
Man, do they SUCK.
I mean, that logo looks like someone used a gym-teacher's handkerchief
to blow their nose, and it kind of landed on the side of the helmet.
It ranks just below DEC's new burgundy logo on the list of totally
messed up logos.
Whoever came up with that logo should be shot.....
'Saw
|
56.339 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hey... what's going on? | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:24 | 2 |
| Some Elvis lover I'm sure...
|
56.340 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:25 | 8 |
| > Some Elvis lover I'm sure...
Elvis died on the can in mid-peench, reading a article entitled
"The Scientific Search for the Face of Jesus"
Man, can you imagine going like that?
|
56.341 | Cant beleive what some will fight AGAINST.... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 07 1993 18:30 | 17 |
| Whats up with the Flotting Gambling casino's... Face if if people want
to gamble there going to gamble. The biggest thing I see happening is
keeping the money in mass rather then sending it to Conneticut. Where
they dont even pay taxes on the money (Indian reservation).
Ever been to CT's casino, the Parking lot is full of MA plates and the
Busses are coming from the North...
The Casino's is a great idea and will not promot NEW GAMBLERs just keep
them in mass and help generate money for MA rather then CT or NJ.
Might even keep some from travleing to Vagas....
This is a NO Brainer... People are going to gamble no matter what you
do so why not have the state and government make the money rather then
the mafia and bookies....
MaB
|
56.342 | 'Saw is a very generous kinda guy | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Wed Sep 08 1993 12:03 | 27 |
| Re: "I spent the $50 on someone really special", here are the
Top Ten uses 'Saw had to spend the $50 on someone really special:
10) Auntie Ethel needed a new set of false teeth.
9) Finally got around to paying the barber for his haircut.
8) Sent in the pledge to Jimmy Swaggart.
7) Every secretary needs to feel appreciated.
6) There was a special on "Beavis and Butthead" dolls and
'Saw had to have them both.
5) The dog needed to get fixed.
4) Kev is still taking donations to buy that Mexican growth hormone.
3) Ken Olson's surprise birthday party needed some balloons.
2) Hartford hookers are getting expensive.
and the #1 way 'Saw spent the $50 on spmeone special:
1) A donation to the governor to help build a stadium for the Patriots!
NAZZ
|
56.343 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Wed Sep 08 1993 12:07 | 2 |
| Well, okay, if you must know, I spent the $50 on my "boys". I needed to
buy a truss.......
|
56.344 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Wed Sep 08 1993 15:56 | 11 |
| Mike "Air", my point is that whenever there's talk about *real*
gambling (wagering on sporting events, etc.) the state's arguement is
that it is "crack cocaine" like addictive and take the moral high
ground. But when it's gambling where they can't lose suddenly there's
no moral problem. Phonyism at it's best (which is what Massachusetts
pols excell at).
I'll be wearing what I think should be the Patriot's new colors and
logo this Sunday (it'll be very mainly).
/Don
|
56.345 | If there going to gambel there going to gamble | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 08 1993 16:02 | 25 |
| Yes but this is gambling where you can get behind and lose more then
you can afford and end up in debt to a guy you dont want to owe money
too, and depending on your position he may take advantage of you in
a few different ways. This also can lead to crime becuase youd rather
spend time in jail then owe these people money... But make it legal,
the odds will be better and the state dont let you fall behind in what
you owe :-), no money no play...
I just feel that there's is going to be gambling no matter what you
do. I can place a bet with about 5 different guys today, no problem.
If I lose I can bet until next tuesday before I have to pay up. Have
a bad week and you looking at some serious trouble... Id rather that
the state was making the profit not the bookies, plus maybe it will
put some extra money in the budget to either lower taxes or keep them
from going up.
Floating Casino's will do one thing, keep people from going to CT and
maybe draw some out of staters to boston rather then CT, NY or NV.
Sports gambling will take money from one group, the Bookies...
Im sorry but seeing less money put into the bookies pockets and the
casino's on other state will not bring tears to my eyes.....
MairB
|
56.346 | best laugh in months | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Wed Sep 08 1993 16:10 | 6 |
| >> But make it legal, the odds will be better <<
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
hhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa11111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mike
|
56.347 | Im assuming you no what JUICE is... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 08 1993 16:13 | 5 |
| Well Im asuming you wont pay JUICE if your betting thru the state !!!
Most gamblers would put down many different bets, and at the end of
the week if they didnt have to pay the JUICE they would proberbly
do ok....
MaB
|
56.348 | exit | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Wed Sep 08 1993 16:25 | 21 |
|
> Well Im asuming you wont pay JUICE if your betting thru the state !!!
> Most gamblers would put down many different bets, and at the end of
> the week if they didnt have to pay the JUICE they would proberbly
> do ok....
Of course I know what "Juice" is....it comes from a orange...
What makes you think the state won't charge "Juice"?????????
They'd call it administrative costs....
most pols learnt from the crooks that put there in the first place...
besides the state probably wouldn't allow you to bet straight up...
make you play a card where you had to pick 4 teams or more, in an effort
to increase their chance of winning.....
mike
|
56.349 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Wed Sep 08 1993 16:40 | 7 |
| Hey I wouldn't mind the state taking a 10% vigorish, that way the
aim is to get money bet equally. Like I said, even though at the end
of the year the state would come out way ahead if they booked football,
they would rather concentrate on games, that if you or I ran on a
street corner would be called con-games and we would time for.
/Don
|
56.350 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 08 1993 17:08 | 11 |
| �I just feel that there's is going to be gambling no matter what you
� do. I can place a bet with about 5 different guys today, no problem.
� If I lose I can bet until next tuesday before I have to pay up. Have
� a bad week and you looking at some serious trouble...
They don't call him Mike "Air" Brooks for nothing.
� Sports gambling will take money from one group, the Bookies...
Depends on where you do your gambling. Some states have legalized
sports gambling.
|
56.351 | | 15724::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Wed Sep 08 1993 17:12 | 6 |
| Other than Nevada what other states have legal sports gambling??
I think it is not allowed in Atlantic City.
The Crazy Met
|
56.352 | Has to be private to be fair; then where's the state's cut? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 09 1993 10:30 | 14 |
|
Somehow I just don't see the state of Massachusetts (or any state, for
that matter) as ready or able to set up a professional Vegas-style
sports betting operation that would allow fair, single-game wagers.
Running a sports book is not a trivial matter, and some have gone out
of business. Even for Vegas it's a complicated exercise requiring
monitoring of national betting trends. I agree with MikeC; if you ever
see legalized state-run sports betting look for it to be of the
pick-4-winners, collect 8-to-one ripoff variety. It's been tried in
states like Oregon (don't know if it's still running or not, because of
the lousy payoffs) and that's what they did...
glenn
|
56.353 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Thu Sep 09 1993 10:34 | 21 |
| Plus, let's face it, the folks who run State Government are not all
that swift, for the most part.
I've had friends who work for the State and they tell me horror stories
about folks who simply got a state job because it's pretty secure, you
don't have to produce (cf Department of Motor Vehicles) and the work
is easy.
I can't see some enterprising young, shirt and tie, State employee going
"Golly Gee Whiz, Governor Weicker, I think we should set up a sports
betting scheme, and I'm just the guy to do it"
Glenn is right -- it's got to be private to be fair, and the state would
never allow that.
How do they do it in England? I know they bet on EVERYTHING over there.....
'Saw
|
56.355 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Thu Sep 09 1993 10:52 | 18 |
| > England has privately-owned book shops. Anybody who has ever bet with
> a bookie (not me!) knows that they are nimble-minded shrewd individuals.
Thanks, I wasn't aware if they were private concerns or government run.
> That's not exactly something the state has in surplus.
That, my friend, is a Universal Truth.
And of course, all this talk of gambling if purely for amusement purposes
only.....8^)
'Saw
|
56.356 | yeah right...... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Thu Sep 09 1993 10:58 | 16 |
|
AND, just remember that the folks in government are the folks
who couldn't a) either get a job in the real world or
b) couldn't HOLD a real job in the business world!
I mean, name one single building/project that took 30 years to finalize
(like the new Shawmutt Center aka da new garden) the plans on in the
private sector.
NB - the pyramids of Egypt are not eligible, they were monarchially
sponsored!
I remain,
wondering if gov't employees can be weathermen (at 30% accuracy)
Kev
|
56.357 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Thu Sep 09 1993 11:29 | 5 |
| Kevin, what happened to you starting notes with "yabbut" ?
Just wondrin,
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
56.358 | exit | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Thu Sep 09 1993 11:40 | 6 |
|
I hear we're getting Keno in this state....We ought to get our sales
force down to see Malone and Weld and sell them some Alphas. Tell
Weld he can get and extra 12 games per hour with our machines!!!!
;^)
|
56.359 | uh huh | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:41 | 21 |
|
Yabbut I sometimes do it for variety. I fired up 2 brain cells on this
gambling thing and I think it's a good idea.
Foist, maybe some of the laid off digits can get employed (can you
imagine Hawk and Dickstah dealing????).
I like MikeyC's idea of populating them with Alpha's cause then we get
to keep our paychecks for maybe 3 or 4 more weeks :^(
'nuther idea is NOT to have them state run (only causes more taxes,
retirememt stuff and all the other baggage). Rather, franchise or
award a contract to a_independant company for say 5 years. Then all ya
gotta do is hire a few state auditors or some big 5 company. Of
course, this is only to minimize the mob effect. They're gonna get in
there anyway.
I remain,
2 cents poorer
Kev
|
56.360 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:43 | 12 |
| � Running a sports book is not a trivial matter, and some have gone out
� of business.
HAHAHAHA�! What was it the late Pete Axthelm used to call his bookie,
Captain Cry. I used to be friends with a bookie Herbie Goguen (God rest
his soul) and over a few beers he would tell you the horror stories about
games where the money was all on one team or how guys used to skip town
without paying off... I always used to ask him why, at the age of 55,
would he keep doing this year after year if all he did was lose money? He
always would answer that he did it for us. What a public servant! 8^)
/Don
|
56.361 | From WEEI | CSLALL::BRULE | Back to Life Back to reality | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| Breaking story. Orthwein has pulled out as major backer for the St.
Louis group looking for an NFL expansion team. No idea what this means
or what he'll do but it could be very bad news for New Englanders.
It could be the St Louis Patsies.
Mike
|
56.362 | I'll be the first to say... I TOLD YOU SO! | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:04 | 1 |
|
|
56.363 | NJ will never have legalized sports betting | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:44 | 11 |
| NJ had a big fight over legalized gambling but in the end the
sanctimonious troika of Bill Bradley,PJ Carlesimo and Chuck Daly helped
shoot it down.
A local politician who opposed it and the Donald got into a great
argument about it on a local talk radio program. Trump claimed the
pol wouldn't support it because his bookie friends bought him off.
I just can't see the harm of legalizing sports betting in a state
like NJ. I'm also for legalizing prostitution. Prohibition doesn't
work,but politicians don't ever do the logical thing.
|
56.364 | | 15724::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Thu Sep 09 1993 15:55 | 8 |
|
In Vegas betting is prohibited on games that involve local teams - that
pretty much means UNLV basketball. They could have the same rule in NJ,
but that would stop action on Seton Hall, Nets, Devils, Giants, and
Jets which is a large number of teams (especially 2 NFL teams).
The Crazy Met
|
56.365 | sorta | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:01 | 14 |
| The only thing here is that the Las Vegas bettin' parlors, by agreement,
won't book UNLV. This pretty much only only effects the basketball since
very few places book 1-AA games.
They most certainly will book any fight that takes place there.
The extension to other states doesn't matter since there isn't any legal
bookmaking on sports except in Nevada. Certainly New Jersey doesn't have
it.
I feel quite confident that local, do-it-yourself entrepreneurs (bookies)
would be glad to furnish any and all lines.
TTom
|
56.366 | They don't have to have the smart money to make money | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 09 1993 19:53 | 20 |
|
� Running a sports book is not a trivial matter, and some have gone out
� of business.
>
> HAHAHAHA�! What was it the late Pete Axthelm used to call his bookie,
> Captain Cry. I used to be friends with a bookie Herbie Goguen (God rest
> his soul) and over a few beers he would tell you the horror stories about
> games where the money was all on one team or how guys used to skip town
> without paying off...
I was talking about legal, fair sports books in Vegas, not the local
arm-breakers. God only knows what kind of vigorish and other
inducements the wise guys are extracting to keep their "businesses"
going. Likewise, the state can also take the path of least resistance
and make the most money by running a scam operation, with no shortage
of gullible customers. The scratch cards and other lottery games are
proof enough of that. Why work at it when you don't have to?
glenn
|
56.367 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Fri Sep 10 1993 14:26 | 4 |
| Gee, am I the only one who thinks that this Bushcwhine resignation thing does
not bode well for the Foxboro Footballers? Seems that without ol' Jimmy's
money from the sale for the Pats, St. Louis is no longer a lock for a franchise.
That being the case, well you know the rest...
|
56.368 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 10 1993 14:30 | 37 |
|
[email protected] articles by Thu, 9 Sep 93:
--------
Subject: Patriots owner steps aside in St. Louis
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 93 17:01:19 PDT
FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- New England Patriots owner James Orthwein
resigned Thursday as chairman of the investor group seeking an NFL
franchise in St. Louis, apparently clearing the way for him to sell the
Patriots for top dollar and keep the team in Massachusetts.
Orthwein has been under NFL pressure to sell the Patriots as long as
he remained a majority stockholder of the St. Louis group, but his
resignation appeared to give him more time to find local buyers and hold
out for a higher bid.
Francis Murray, a former part-owner of the Patriots and a new
stockholder in the St. Louis group, has already offered Orthwein $133
million for the team, providing the Patriots are moved to Hartford,
Conn.
But Orthwein has promised Massachusetts Gov. William Weld to keep the
Patriots in the state for 30 years providing a way is found to build a
$700 million sports-convention center in the Boston area to house the
team, which now plays in suburban Foxboro, Mass.
Orthwein, who will remain a minority partner in the St. Louis deal,
did not put a deadline on selling the Pats, but said he had retained the
Wall Street investment banking firm of Goldman Sachs to evaluate offers
and said he expected to ``start making decisions on our options in the
near future.''
Weld, meanwhile, appeared before a state legislative committee
Thursday to urge approval of his plan to finance the so-called megaplex.
The proposal includes floating gambling casinos in Boston Harbor and new
state bonds, both of which face stiff opposition among legislative
leaders.
Weld said the complex, which would include a domed statdium, would
put Boston ``in the top tier'' of convention cities in the United
States, and would allow Massachusetts to host such events as the Super
Bowl and college basketball's Final Four.
|
56.369 | The ST Louis Patroit Win Superbowl XXIX | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Sep 10 1993 14:35 | 4 |
| How many years are there left on the Foxboro Lease ? I thought
Orthewein sold his intrest to another rich dude ?
MaB
|
56.370 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good mornin' america, how are ya'? | Fri Sep 10 1993 15:23 | 15 |
|
It sounds like super fran put legal schananigans on the whole St Lous deal.
My prediction is that St. Loius will get an expansion franchise (in thanks for
super fran bailing out the pats), fran will sell the pats for top dollar (maybe
not until 1995 when the team begins to draw fans again after a decent season)
and will then miraculously turn his minority part of the St. Louis franchise
into a majority ownership when one of the majority owners sells his part of the
St Louis spirits to frugal fran.
fran is trying to get a bidding war between Conn and Mass over the pats and
sell out for maximum profit....
Metz
|
56.371 | falling | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Fri Sep 10 1993 15:24 | 16 |
| Locally, they're trying to make a big deal of Orthwein's dropping out of
the St. Louis bid.
Basically, this is the second time recently that St. Louis, the supposed
lock for a bid, has stubbed its toe. They were the only city in the
running to not sell out the luxury boxes. The NFL, for some reason, put
that on the list of things it wanted to see done. Charlotte, Baltimore
and even Jacksonville sold all of theirs. Now the principal money behind
the bid is gone leaving them to try to convince the NFL that they still
have a cartel with enough money to fund the $200 mil to join the club.
One irony of this may be that Orthwein won't be trying to move the Pats
to St. Louis. And the league can go a long way to prevent that by
awarding a new team to St. Louis.
TTom
|
56.372 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Fri Sep 10 1993 15:52 | 6 |
|
There is too many things happening at once here. I'm too far away to
get all the details, but some plan is being worked. We'll probably all
figure it out in a month or two.
brews
|
56.374 | Hey, I like Barney Rubble as a mascot! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:40 | 1 |
|
|
56.375 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Never trust a big butt & a smile | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:48 | 4 |
| I thought it was Barney Fife... figure with Mr. Drummond from Diffrent
Strokes... Fife and Drummond would be good mascots for the Pats...
|
56.376 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:50 | 4 |
| Barney Bites. One of those 'raptor dinosaurs would be a nice
mascot though. Walt(e), get out of this mainly Patriots note!
/Don
|
56.377 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good mornin' america, how are ya'? | Fri Sep 10 1993 18:47 | 13 |
|
You got it slasher....
The New England Dinos...we'd corner the kiddie NFL merchandise market and make
enough to have the state of Mass buy the Pats, lock stock and barrell and
george Kevarian could be the new nose tackle....
Bring back Tip O'neil as an o-lineman and put a dress on dukakis and let him
play QB...
Yeah,
Metz
|
56.378 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:39 | 1 |
| Yeah yeah, I'll stay out of it...
|
56.379 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:47 | 40 |
| Some miscellaneous thoughts:
o The Patriots uniforms SUCK. The logo does worse than suck,
but I just can't find the words. The logo looks like a
sick sperm cell, trying valiantly to keep up with the other
little sperms heading towards that egg, but doomed to be
in the back of the pack.
The logo is almost, but not quite, as bad as our new logo.
o The Patriots defense has good speed laterally down the line
and they did a good job shutting down Barry Sanders to the
outside. Unfortunately, he managed to get up the middle.
o Patriots special teams need work.
o Patriots need a running back -- badly. I've never seen a
Parcells team throw so much, and as /Don and Denny and Glenn
pointed out "if the Pats had anyone who could run the ball,
they'd be running instead of passing"
o Bledsoe is good. If the Pats can build a decent team around
him, they can contend. He made several plays that looked like
veteran QB type of plays.
o The Pats made mistakes at all the wrong times. They made mistakes
on key plays, and lost the game.
o The cheerleaders are fine -- very fine, and there's more of them
now.
o The girl who was running the camera for CBS was looking VERY
good.....
'Saw
|
56.380 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 13 1993 11:37 | 8 |
| � o Patriots need a running back -- badly. I've never seen a
� Parcells team throw so much, and as /Don and Denny and Glenn
� pointed out "if the Pats had anyone who could run the ball,
� they'd be running instead of passing"
I think Russell is just fine. The reason a Parcells team is throwing
so much is because he finally has a QB who can throw. They've also
been forcing themselves into playing catch up.
|
56.381 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 11:56 | 13 |
| > I think Russell is just fine. The reason a Parcells team is throwing
> so much is because he finally has a QB who can throw. They've also
> been forcing themselves into playing catch up.
Parcells had a QB who could throw in NY. Simms has proven that again
and again. Simms just didn't have great wide-outs. He could hit
Bavaro though....
Russell doesn't seem to have a lot of speed.......
'Saw
|
56.382 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 13 1993 12:21 | 7 |
56.383 | | MKFSA::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:27 | 24 |
| I'm gonna hafta disagree wit ya, Frankie, on the uniforms. I like 'em.
After all think of all the negative things that go along with the color
red....
o the color of the British imperialists' coats
o the color no one wanted to be related to in the McCarthyism
years (Commies)
o the color no one likes to see in their bank book
o the color your face turns when you are either embarassed or
really pi$$ed
Blue is the all-American color. Somebody told me yesterday that it was
like the Steelers changing their logo and uniforms. Again, I disagree.
If and when the Pats ever have a dynasty or even a string of winning
seasons, then all this fuss about changing the logo and uniforms would
make sense. I would think true Patriot fans would want to erase any
reminder of how absolutly atroucious they were. After all that's exactly
what the Steelers did when Chuck Noll took over and the rest is history.
As far as the cheerleaders and Russell go, I'm in total agreement wit ya,
'Saw. I spent all night last night cleaning the slobber off of my
binoculars from yunz guys.
billl
|
56.384 | | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from the lost civilization | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:29 | 2 |
| Is the line protecting Bledsoe, or will he see the same fate as a young
Jim Plunkett?
|
56.385 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:33 | 20 |
| > Is the line protecting Bledsoe, or will he see the same fate as a young
> Jim Plunkett?
For the most part, Bledsoe had good protection yesterday, I thought.
re Bill and the unis:
Their unis look "cheap and chintzy", kind of like the old USFL
stuff.
I didn't get any slobber on your binoculars.... After that bozo
behind me spilled beer on my seat, I just slobbered on myself,
so I could be wet from both sides......
'Saw
|
56.386 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:45 | 3 |
| Chris Berman made a USFL crack about the uniforms last night... Then
again, he did when they change to the Pittsburgh Loons too...
|
56.387 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:50 | 3 |
|
I thought the old unis and logo were just fine but I don't care if they
traipse around in tutus as long as they win football games.
|
56.388 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Sep 13 1993 15:26 | 5 |
| Well, just before the new logos, etc., were unveiled, someone
said the old logo looked "like someone taking a dump." I agreed
then and I still agree now.
Scott
|
56.389 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:24 | 5 |
| � Well, just before the new logos, etc., were unveiled, someone
� said the old logo looked "like someone taking a dump."
As anyone who has played the line knows, you're supposed to look like
that while in a 3 point stance!
|
56.390 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:28 | 11 |
| |� Well, just before the new logos, etc., were unveiled, someone
|� said the old logo looked "like someone taking a dump."
|
| As anyone who has played the line knows, you're supposed to look like
| that while in a 3 point stance!
I'd rather look like someone taking a good healthy dump than look
like "a shot that missed the pot".....
8^)
|
56.391 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good mornin' america, how are ya'? | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:26 | 22 |
|
After two games does anybody want to go back to the draft and take Rick Mirer
over Drew Bledsoe?
I said it then and I'll say it again. This guy is an NFL super stud and if he
can survive this year and parcells gets to throw around some of super frans
cash for some O-linemen (they are in great shape under the salary cap) the Pats
will be a contender in a couple of years.
Parcells is smart enough to adapt his style to his players. The Pats will have
a balanced attack but it will be more throw then the Giants were under his
reign. Irving Fryar will wish he stayed in NE (although he's got a decent QB
throwing to him).
Mirer is playing magician here in seattle, repeatedly running for his life
behind an offensive line that carries red capes as part of the standard uniform
(in order to ole the defensive linemen on their way to Mirer's mid section).
Metz
|
56.392 | Well MikeL might disagree with 'ya Metz | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:32 | 4 |
| what imagery Metz.
The Crazy Met
|
56.393 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:37 | 13 |
| Why would I disagree with Metz?
Nowhere in his reply did he say that Mirer would be a flop, only
that he be running for his life. I assume he thinks Bledsoe was better
than Mirer and I have no problem with that. In fack, he jest might
be right. I only objected to Metz stating that Bledsoe was 10X the QB
that Mirer is. I disagree with that, but we'll soon find out!
BTW, I'm happy that the Pats drafted Bledsoe rather than Mirer.
But that don't mean Mirer is chopped liver either.
MikeL
|
56.394 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:40 | 3 |
|
I'm with MikeL. It's also a little tough to tell how good Mirer really
is right now when he's constantly in survival mode.
|
56.395 | Still, the early impressions are favorable... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:50 | 29 |
|
> After two games does anybody want to go back to the draft and take Rick Mirer
> over Drew Bledsoe?
Drew was my man then, now, and until he otherwise demonstrates that he's
not the star in the making that he appears to be, always. It was
Slashmain and Tommy that wanted to draft that midget linebacker Marvin
Jones ;-), who last I heard couldn't crack the Jests' starting lineup
(although that may have been due to reasons other than his ability, like
falling behind after his holdout; I really don't know).
Bledsoe has the ability but he does have a long way to go. The one
thing that disappointed me in yesterday's game was that after surviving
some pretty good pressure (he may need to be more attentive about
holding onto the ball with this team's pass protection) and executing
well on some nice timing patterns on the game-tying drive and on
that nice long-gainer to Russell in overtime, he kind of choked on the
first reasonably "easy" deep opportunities he had against the Lions'
secondary all afternoon. I don't know what caused the Lions to finally
break down back there, but on the first missed play that Brisby kid was
wide open for the game-winner, and on the other play the Lions' DB had
to grab some shirt to contain his man but the zebra ruled that Bledsoe's
pass was too high and too far out-of-bounds to be catchable. After
playing a pretty decent game, those missed opportunities on the last
possession of the game left a bit of a bad taste as far as Bledsoe's
overall performance went...
glenn
|
56.396 | 2 pt. sit is better | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from the lost civilization | Mon Sep 13 1993 18:09 | 4 |
| | As anyone who has played the line knows, you're supposed to look like
| that while in a 3 point stance!
I never use to 3 pt. stance while taking a dump.
|
56.397 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Mon Sep 13 1993 18:11 | 8 |
| re: .395
Bledsoe is a rookie; those were rookie mistakes. I wouldn't worry about
it at this point. If he is still making those mistakes consistently at
the end of the season it might be of greater concern.
The Crazy Met
|
56.398 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Sep 13 1993 21:59 | 10 |
| re: .396
Not even when camping? Ya know...two pt squat stance with one arm
behind for support?
re: Bleed-so
Bledsoe = Ken O'Brien
JoJ_NOT
|
56.399 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:24 | 12 |
| >
> JoJ_NOT
>
Hey, JoJ_NOT,
Please tell JoJ that FrankWa says the Scorpions RULE!
thanks,
'Saw
|
56.400 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:15 | 6 |
| Hey Marie, take it to the Sissy Note (a.k.a. Jests Note). Bledsoe,
Slade and Brisby looked good Sunday, but they still lost and the
defense couldn't contain Sanders or Moore when they really had to.
/Don
|
56.401 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Tue Sep 14 1993 23:00 | 5 |
| Slasher, JoJ knew you'd come back with some baloney about the Pats
looking good....and what the heck kinda name is Brisby for a football
player?
JoJ_NOT
|
56.402 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Tue Sep 14 1993 23:18 | 1 |
| Same as Norman, Blair and Browning?
|
56.403 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 15 1993 09:51 | 15 |
|
>> Drew was my man then, now, and until he otherwise demonstrates that he's
>> not the star in the making that he appears to be, always. It was
>> Slashmain and Tommy that wanted to draft that midget linebacker Marvin
>> Jones ;-), who last I heard couldn't crack the Jests' starting lineup
>> (although that may have been due to reasons other than his ability, like
>> falling behind after his holdout; I really don't know).
Jones' problem is that he's having trouble picking up the Jets' defense
whether that's because he held out or he's just stupid, I don't know.
The jury, as far as I'm concerned, is still out whether the Pats picked
the best player in the draft. Mirer is stuck with that gad-awful line up
in Seattle and Jones is off to a slow start. Give it two or three years
and we'll see what's what.
|
56.404 | KOD warning | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Wed Sep 15 1993 11:53 | 6 |
| I just picked up Drew for my FFL team. I'll probably start him against
Seattle so everyone should expect a_underachieving day outta him.
What's this I read about the center hurt and out?
TTom
|
56.405 | | MKFSA::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:15 | 7 |
|
>>What's this I read about the center hurt and out?
I read that too in this morning's paper.
billl
|
56.406 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:28 | 6 |
| Hey TommyB, it would be ironic though if both Bledsoe and Slade
were all-star performers and Jones was yet another in a series of Jests
draft blunders. I would gladly munch crow if that were the case.
/Don
|
56.407 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 15 1993 13:34 | 5 |
| � Hey TommyB, it would be ironic though if both Bledsoe and Slade
� were all-star performers and Jones was yet another in a series of Jests
� draft blunders.
It would also add to Nazz' list of reasons Dick Steinberg is overrated.
|
56.408 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 15 1993 15:00 | 4 |
|
I remember Jets fans booing the selection of Jeff Logeman on draft day. Of
course, now the guy's a Pro Bowl player and a dirty one at that. Two things
that New Yorkers can appreciate.
|
56.409 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Wed Sep 15 1993 21:49 | 8 |
| Well, one Jets fan predicted that Lageman would be a pro-bowler. Who
was that masked fan? Why, JoJ (a.k.a. Carnac) of course.
Whereas /Nostra_have_another_DONus was WRONG AGAIN.
JoJ_NOT
|
56.410 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 16 1993 10:56 | 5 |
| � Well, one Jets fan predicted that Lageman would be a pro-bowler. Who
� was that masked fan? Why, JoJ (a.k.a. Carnac) of course.
Yabbut, he says that about every Jests player. What's that they say
about blind squirrels?
|
56.411 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | SFGiants'93,NYStockExchange'29 | Thu Sep 16 1993 12:41 | 4 |
| Yeah, what's JoJ's overall average in predicting successful Jester
draft picks?
Nostra/DONus
|
56.412 | or, they might loose ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Mon Sep 20 1993 10:17 | 12 |
|
Yabbut it seems that the patsies are, if nothing else, keeping ya
interested in the outcome of the game. They almost tied it with a
couple of seconds left in the game, only to have the field goal attempt
hit the crossbar.
Mirer won the battle of the QB's, imo.
I remain,
having a premonition they might win next week!
Kev
|
56.413 | and the other half on his back | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 20 1993 11:21 | 3 |
| � Mirer won the battle of the QB's, imo.
How? He spent half the game on the bench.
|
56.414 | tough break on that FG attempt | FRETZ::HEISER | AWANA | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:14 | 1 |
|
|
56.415 | Pigskinnus Interruptus 8^( | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOver | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:30 | 1 |
|
|
56.416 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOver | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:53 | 15 |
| On the bright side Chris Slade is no longer a "ball in tall grass"
anymore. Forget stats, for the entire second half the Seahawks ran
their play away from Slade's side about 90% of the time. Late in the
fourth quarter Parcells was flipflopping Slade and Tippet so Seattle
wouldn't know where he was. He may be the best player on the team
right now.
Singleton continues to verify that the trading down of their '90
pick (and passing on Kennedy and Seau), for two lower round picks may have
been the biggest draft day blunder in Pats history (and that's saying a
lot!) Somebody actually rented a plane to fly the following banner
over Foxboro Stadium: "We wanted wins not blue jerseys and a crap
logo". I loved it!
/Don
|
56.417 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 20 1993 14:19 | 1 |
| What's a ball in tall grass?
|
56.418 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Sep 20 1993 14:35 | 6 |
| Mac,
Ball in tall grass = Cannot be seen
I think,
Scott
|
56.419 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 20 1993 14:51 | 4 |
|
Parcells said about Slade earlier this year:
"He's like a ball in tall grass. You know what that is? Lost."
|
56.420 | SOME GOOD THINGS AMID THE GLOOM | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Mon Sep 20 1993 15:47 | 11 |
| Singleton got benched for Todd Collins, who played a terrific 4th
quarter - had five tackles and an interception. He stuff Warren on a
3rd and inches at the Seahawk 29 to force a punt late in the 4th
quarter.
Vincent Brisby also got benched, but I don't know why. If anyone
should sit down, it's Timpson. But getting Ray Crittendon on the field
was a great idea. That catch he made over the middle to keep the final
drive alive was a thing of beauty!!!!!!!!
NAZZ
|
56.421 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NewYork-ItsNotOverWhenItsOver | Mon Sep 20 1993 16:01 | 5 |
| NAZZ, were you there? On the pass to Crittendon late in the game
Ben Coates was wide, wide open over on the sidelines and would've
trotted into the end zone had Bledsoe seen him.
/Don
|
56.422 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | The Last Pennant Race | Mon Sep 20 1993 16:49 | 8 |
| Heard a fella say he watched game at rockingham - not a bad idea on
blacked out games
Same guy is full of hope for pats - why or how can parcells lose 3, 2
at home to ordinary teams and come up roses while same thing last
year.. well, you know
the century of imaging is upon us all
|
56.423 | | DECWET::METZGER | UNIX is cool, huh-huh, huh-huh-huh | Mon Sep 20 1993 17:03 | 20 |
|
It took the New England defense to make the Seattle offense look good.
I don't think the Seahawks scored more than 16 points in any game last season.
The big thing the pats lacked is a Rb catching passes out of the backfield.
John L. Williams burnt the pats several times catching them. The Pats defense
also made Chris Warren, who is a decent back, look all world.
Bledsoe needs to learn to look off to secondary recievers instead of fixating
on 1 guy. Watch steve Young for a lesson in how to do this.
The Pats should abandon all pretense at a balanced offensive attack and work on
a hurry-up, no huddle approach to maximize their scoring chances. They have no
offensive line to run block....
Nice effort by the kicker.....almost went to O.T.....
Metz
|
56.424 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 20 1993 17:20 | 7 |
| �The big thing the pats lacked is a Rb catching passes out of the backfield.
Yet another past Patriot strength sacrificed in the name of Parcells
getting "his" players on the field. John Stephens was quite good at
this. Letting Fryar go fits into this category as well (Pats finally
get a topnotch QB and let go the only receiver that warrants double
coverage).
|
56.425 | Seachickens Sip Soggy Seaweed...but can beat the Pats | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Sep 20 1993 19:42 | 3 |
| HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
JOJ_NOT
|
56.426 | | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Tue Sep 21 1993 09:33 | 5 |
|
Mac, any coach who would double-team Fryar, deserves to be in an unemployment
line.............
mike
|
56.427 | | CAM3::WAY | Immature Color Liker | Tue Sep 21 1993 12:39 | 13 |
| Most folks forget that Parcells first year with the Giants was 3-12-1, and
yet in three seasons he had them to the Super Bowl.
That first season the Giants lost a lot of close games, and all of us
Giants fans were doing the same thing that some of the Pats fans are doing
now -- pissing and moaning.
His system brought two rings to a franchise that hadn't had a champeenship
in 30 years. And you can bet that if the Pats DO get back to the Bowl,
they won't throw up such a pathetic effort as in 1985.....
'Saw
|
56.428 | | SCHELL::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 21 1993 12:42 | 4 |
| In 1985 the Bears would have massacred whatever team they met
in the Super Bowl.
The Crazy Met
|
56.429 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 21 1993 12:44 | 2 |
|
Except the Dolphins.
|
56.430 | | SCHELL::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 21 1993 12:54 | 5 |
| Nope. Dolphins that year did beat the Bears in Miami, but the Dolphins
were not THAT good; Bears would have had even more incentive to beat
them up in the Super Bowl.
The Crazy Met
|
56.431 | maybe not | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Tue Sep 21 1993 15:15 | 7 |
|
DOn't be so sure of yourself there TCM. Most of the Bears' ability that year
was built on inner motivation, had they met and got down early to Miami after
already loosing to them once I could see them doubting theirselves and blowin
it.....Shula not the greatest genius around was a tad smarter than Ditka...
mike
|
56.432 | | SCHELL::francus | NY YANKEES: A SPORTS DYNASTY | Tue Sep 21 1993 15:46 | 9 |
| Miami was sooo up for that game against the Bears; not just the teams the
whole freakin' city. A friend of mine who taught 3rd and 4th grade in Miami
at that time said that the next day all the kids were basically asleep
since they had all been allowed to stay up and watch the whole game. If I recall
the Bears were 11-0 or 12-0 and Miami was the only team that remotely had
a chance to prevent an unbeaten season. I'm pretty sure the SB would have been
very different. Bears defense in the playoffs was awesome!
The Crazy Met
|
56.433 | history the ACC way... | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Tue Sep 21 1993 16:14 | 4 |
|
If LandettA hadn't wiffed, the Giants would have kicked their butts.....
mike
|
56.434 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Wins-NotBlueJersey&CrapLogo | Tue Sep 21 1993 16:52 | 1 |
| Quit talkin' about DaBeers and Midgets in my note!
|
56.435 | Coates wasn't the only guy Bledsoe missed | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Wed Sep 22 1993 15:34 | 8 |
| Yeah, I was there. Up in the booth wif da Ninj. Ya gots the best
of both worlds up there - see the game on the field, and watch the
replays on the monitor. I musta missed Coates on the play.
John Hendry sez Hello to everybody. He hasn't broken a beachball in
a long time, and misses them good ol' days.
NAZZ
|
56.436 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Listen to the music of the night | Sun Sep 26 1993 23:53 | 10 |
| Hey Slasher,
Ya gotta love that Patsie's defense in the firsted half tonite, eh??
35-0 Jets in the first half alone.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
56.437 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Mon Sep 27 1993 09:58 | 9 |
| The Pats defense was sieve-like last night, and Boomer was slicing
through them the way Kev cuts the cheese at the OPP.
However, the second half seemed much more like a normal Jets-Pats game,
the second half total being 10-7. Of course, the Jets went to Nagle
so perhaps that explains it...8^)
'Saw
|
56.438 | | SCHELL::francus | po' po' Chappy | Mon Sep 27 1993 10:39 | 3 |
| looks like /er will have to pay up this year.
The Crazy Met
|
56.439 | Who's the best to pick? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Mon Sep 27 1993 10:50 | 18 |
|
Yabbut is it too early to start talking about who the Patsies should
draft when they have the #1 pick?
Will Parcell get sacked?
When will the Patsies get a few breaks by the ClemsonRefs(tm)?
What will come first, hell freezin over or the Patsies 1st win?
Heard on the radion thisted AM that so far in this decade, the Pats
have won NINE (count 'm 9) games. Soooo, what's the problem? Ya want
everything??????
I remain,
stoopid enough to stay up and watch it until they scored!
Kev
|
56.440 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Mon Sep 27 1993 11:51 | 8 |
| >
> Will Parcell get sacked?
>
Probably not. His first year in NY was 3-12-1, the second year was 9-7
and then two years after that they won the Super Bowl.
'Saw
|
56.441 | | ROYALT::ASHE | check da hook while da DJ revolves it | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:43 | 2 |
| It is too early. Cincy is pretty bad too..
|
56.442 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:50 | 8 |
|
It would have been nice for us Pats fans if we could have pointed to just
one positive thing in last night's game but there wasn't anything. Not one.
Bledsoe stunk. The o-line stunk. The d-line stunk worse. Russell couldn't
start for any other team in the league. McMurtry couldn't shake a martini.
The defensive secondary was just awful. This team would have to improve a
whole heap just to suck. To make matters worse, playing in the AFC East ain't
the picnic it used to be. We might not win a game all year.
|
56.443 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:59 | 5 |
| � It would have been nice for us Pats fans if we could have pointed to just
� one positive thing in last night's game but there wasn't anything. Not one.
Here's a couple: The Pats only got beat 10-7 in the second half. They
scored their first rushing TD of the season.
|
56.444 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:02 | 19 |
| > It would have been nice for us Pats fans if we could have pointed to just
> one positive thing in last night's game but there wasn't anything. Not one.
> Bledsoe stunk. The o-line stunk. The d-line stunk worse. Russell couldn't
> start for any other team in the league. McMurtry couldn't shake a martini.
> The defensive secondary was just awful. This team would have to improve a
> whole heap just to suck. To make matters worse, playing in the AFC East ain't
> the picnic it used to be. We might not win a game all year.
There was one positive thing. One of the NE receivers, I forget who
(A TE perhaps), kept going over the middle, taking the shots and trying
to catch the ball.
A receiver who will do that is a good thing, which will pay off when
the team becomes competitive, especially in those 3rd down situations....
JMHO,
'Saw
|
56.445 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:08 | 6 |
| re-1
By the time the team is competitive, the guy going over the middle
will have his career ended;^)
Tim
|
56.446 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:13 | 6 |
| �There was one positive thing. One of the NE receivers, I forget who
�(A TE perhaps), kept going over the middle, taking the shots and trying
�to catch the ball.
Are you thinking of Coates? He had the ground knock out 2 nice catches
in traffic. The Pats do have a nice pair of TEs in Coates and Cook.
|
56.447 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:23 | 13 |
| >> Are you thinking of Coates? He had the ground knock out 2 nice catches
>> in traffic.
One of which was ruled incomplete but shouldn't have been. He did
look good but he won't last long if Bledsoe keeps hanging him out to
dry. He seems to be Parcells' favorite of the two tight ends. He's
more of the rugged Mark Bavaro mold than Cook who is a receiver first
and a blocker second. I was so disgusted after the first half that
I didn't bother to watch the second but from what I've heard,the Jets
took pity on us or the score could have been even worse. Man, do we
need next Sunday off.
|
56.448 | do dis qualify? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:25 | 10 |
|
Yabbut Tommy shirley you remember da announcers saying that the Noo
Yawk Jests have *NEVER* shut out da Patriots! Thisted goes back to
1960 so the fact that they scored with a REAL touchdown to put some
points on da board, instead of those girly-mon field goal attempts had
to be, imho, "one good thang".
I remain,
Kev_on_Stats!
|
56.449 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:29 | 8 |
| � >> Are you thinking of Coates? He had the ground knock out 2 nice catches
� >> in traffic.
�
� One of which was ruled incomplete but shouldn't have been.
Both were ruled incomplete. The second one had a chance at being ruled
a fumble if it weren't incomplete (not sure if the DB knocked it out or
if Coates slamming into the ground on his back did it).
|
56.450 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:32 | 6 |
| I was thinking of Coates.
Poor guy looked totally knackered late in the game.... But he has guts.
'Saw
|
56.451 | It could all be on the line in that contest | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Mon Sep 27 1993 14:58 | 9 |
| THE GAME of the season:
Sunday, December 12
Cincinnati travels to Foxboro to take on the Patriots.
NAZZ
|
56.452 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Mon Sep 27 1993 15:09 | 10 |
|
Think we could have a two week buildup ala the SuperBowl in this note
for the upcoming Cards-Pats game?
lemme start it off
Pats sip! Cardrool!
boC
|
56.453 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Mon Sep 27 1993 15:17 | 4 |
| BTW, the over-under for the game here in two weeks is 30,000. Fans,
that is.
brews
|
56.454 | stick a fork in Bugel; no way they go 8-4 now | FRETZ::HEISER | AWANA | Mon Sep 27 1993 15:50 | 2 |
| The Cards did have some misfortune via the refs yesterday, but they
still sip as well.
|
56.455 | | ROXLEE::francus | po' po' Chappy | Mon Sep 27 1993 15:55 | 7 |
| yeah Brews bold prediction for the Cards is becoming a surer and sure bet of
earning for him an honored spot in topic #50.
/er what's the deal you have with JoJ? is it for the season series??
The Crazy Met
|
56.456 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Barkley > Barney | Mon Sep 27 1993 17:08 | 8 |
| TommyB, there was something positive about last night. I only paid
two dollars more for a pitcher of Killian's Red than I would have paid for
12 ounces of some swill beer had the contest been at Foxboro. Craze we
bet a six pack on each game in the series. The last two years the Pats
won the second game to give me the push. Cincinnati vs. New England in
the Marshall Faulk Bowl!
/Don
|
56.457 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I don't need no stinking Package! | Mon Sep 27 1993 20:34 | 1 |
| Don't forget Tampa is in the running too
|
56.458 | 45-7 | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Sep 27 1993 21:34 | 4 |
| HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...HEY SLASHER, SEND THAT 6 PACK RIGHT AWAY
WILLYA!!!!
|
56.459 | | ROYALT::ASHE | check da hook while da DJ revolves it | Tue Sep 28 1993 10:52 | 2 |
| Atlanta look solid, huh?
|
56.460 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Barkley > Barney | Tue Sep 28 1993 13:26 | 3 |
| Come and get it Waddle!
/Don
|
56.461 | JoJ does Slasher!!! Film @ 11:00 | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Sep 28 1993 13:28 | 1 |
|
|
56.462 | still New England, though | HBAHBA::HAAS | Carolina Blue: Politically Correct | Tue Sep 28 1993 13:47 | 8 |
| What's this about moving the Pats to Connecticut?
I heard a blurb that they're working on some contract that if approved
would have the team move somewhere to Connecticut.
Any details? Insight?
TTom
|
56.463 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 28 1993 14:02 | 7 |
|
There has been talk in here for awhlie about Connecticut trying to
lure the Pats to the Hartford area. In fact, there's a front page
story in the Globe (that I haven't read yet) about Connecticut
approving $252 million in financing for a new stadium. A couple
of more games like this past Sunday's abd Connecticut might want to
rethink this.
|
56.464 | | ROYALT::ASHE | check da hook while da DJ revolves it | Tue Sep 28 1993 14:07 | 2 |
| Waddle's a BC grad and a Bear, get with it /Don..
|
56.465 | | ROXLEE::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 28 1993 14:12 | 10 |
| The CT legislature approved funding for a stadium in Hartford if the Pats
commit to moving into it. This depends on Fred Murray (the old Pats owner)
convincing Orthwein (sp?) (the current Pats owner) to sell the team to Murray.
Murray would then commit to moving the team to CT.
Keep in mind that no one is happy with the Foxboro facility. But for the MA
legislature to get anything done can take years - just witness what shenanigans
went on to get a new Boston Garden built.
The Crazy Met
|
56.466 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:04 | 15 |
| Folks down here are experiencing a plethora of morning wood over this
possibility. They are holding rallies, the legislature is legislating....
Personally, I think it is a waste of time. I will believe that the
Patriots will be in CT when, and not until, the opening kickoff of their
first game here.
But I'll tell you right now it's NOT going to happen.....
btw, have I told you all lately how much the Pats uniforms SUCK?
'Saw
|
56.467 | | ROXLEE::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:06 | 6 |
| 'Saw
why are you so sure it won't happen? because the NFL won't allow it? NFL
has a tough time stopping franchise moves (see Al Davis and Bob Irsay)
The Crazy Met
|
56.468 | | ROYALT::ASHE | check da hook while da DJ revolves it | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:09 | 2 |
| They don't suck, 'Saw, they blow, remember?
|
56.469 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:25 | 8 |
| >why are you so sure it won't happen? because the NFL won't allow it? NFL
>has a tough time stopping franchise moves (see Al Davis and Bob Irsay)
I dunno. Just a feeling. I don't see the folks from Massachusetts giving
up their team.....
'Saw
|
56.470 | | ROXLEE::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:27 | 7 |
| But do you see the MA legislature doing anything within the next 10-20 years
to help keep the Pats?? Not getting into the issue of should governments
do this or not, CT clearly has, MA therefore likely needs to come up
with something. If they had such a bad time getting anything done for the
Celtics and Bruins I just don't see the Pats faring any better.
The Crazy Met
|
56.471 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:47 | 2 |
| I really don't think the NFL would step in to prevent a team from
moving from one spot in New England to another.
|
56.472 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:51 | 8 |
| Orthwhine will never sell the team to Fran Murray, since he can't come up
with enough scratch. (As I recall, the Whiner wants $110 Mil, and the Murray
group can only com up with $104 Mil).
Orthwein will hang on until somebody comes up with the $110 mil, or until he
has an excuse to move the team to St. Louis.
=Bob=
|
56.473 | But then there is the business of the lease | AKOCOA::BREEN | The Last Pennant Race | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:51 | 1 |
|
|
56.474 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:52 | 5 |
| �Orthwhine will never sell the team to Fran Murray, since he can't come up
�with enough scratch. (As I recall, the Whiner wants $110 Mil, and the Murray
�group can only com up with $104 Mil).
I'm sure CT could find $6 mil in that stadium bill...
|
56.475 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:53 | 10 |
| I don't know that much about the Mass legislature, but I think they'd
want to keep the Pats.
=Bob= has the best point, but then there is always another $6 million to
be found. Hell, I'm sure Shamu the Governor can work a deal with the
Mashentucket Pequots to put a few more slots in Foxwoods, marked
"NE Pats to Harfaa or Bust"
'Saw
|
56.476 | Two different animals... | RAAJI::MORGAN | | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:53 | 10 |
| Ya right, TCM. And the already overtaxed taxpayers of Massachusetts
are going to jump for joy when they realize that their cash
strapped state is going to build a stadium for the worst team in
football. No thanks. They've got a billionaire owner that could
basically gives a hoots ass what's good for the people of New England.
The Garden was different. It's being built with private funds,
although the state did deed the land to the builder.
Steve
|
56.477 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 28 1993 15:54 | 8 |
|
As Craze as already pointed out, the NFL has already lost in court when they
tried to prevent Al Davis from moving the Raiders. If Murray buys the Pats and
wants to move 'em there's nothing the league can do short of begging him not
to do it. Murray is using the old Irsay/Davis ploy of ringing concessions out
of a desperate city/state to line his own pockets. He's got the pols down in
the Nutmeg state falling all over themselves to build him a stadium. How much
of his own dough is he tossing into this joint? Not much if any I'm sure.
|
56.478 | you can stay or you can go | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:07 | 19 |
|
Yabbut what if we "loaned" the Patsies to Harffa for a couple of years
while (or until) the new stadiom is built. Ya know, we could have the
right of re-call and bring them back.
and, oh by the way, I really don't care if they stay or if they go.
I don't go to Foxboro and since they (until recently) didn't sell out
the stadium, I don't see them on tee vee. I gotta listen to them on
the radion. This works out pretty well because then I can get chores
done around the house and not be glued to the couch and tee vee so it
really doesn;t matter to me where the game is played. It's all the
same at my house.
:^)
I remain,
wondering if anybody likes da new uniforms?
Kev
|
56.479 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:07 | 8 |
| � Ya right, TCM. And the already overtaxed taxpayers of Massachusetts
� are going to jump for joy when they realize that their cash
� strapped state is going to build a stadium for the worst team in
� football.
Wrong. As we discussed in here earlier, Weld's plan calls for the
Stadium/Convention Center to be funded primarily with legalized
gambling in Boston Harbor.
|
56.480 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:08 | 4 |
| � As Craze as already pointed out, the NFL has already lost in court when they
� tried to prevent Al Davis from moving the Raiders.
And as I already pointed out, the move would be within the same market.
|
56.481 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:10 | 6 |
| � and, oh by the way, I really don't care if they stay or if they go.
� I don't go to Foxboro and since they (until recently) didn't sell out
� the stadium, I don't see them on tee vee.
Either you're not looking hard enough, or the cable company in Grafton
doesn't carry Channel 22 out of Springfield.
|
56.482 | | ROXLEE::francus | po' po' Chappy | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:12 | 6 |
| Kev,
but if they moved you could see them every week since Hartford is beyond
the black-out area.
The Crazy Met
|
56.483 | Hmmmm | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:18 | 10 |
|
Mtm, it's the latter. No Ch22.
Craze, but then how would the house chores get done?
I remain,
I guess just full of questions today....
Kev
|
56.484 | | RAAJI::MORGAN | | Tue Sep 28 1993 18:14 | 5 |
| Mac,
And you don't think gambling is a regressive form of taxation?
Steve
|
56.485 | | DECWET::METZGER | Owner of the scorpion petting zoo. | Tue Sep 28 1993 19:57 | 17 |
|
Pet Peeve alert...
Personally I don't consider any sort of gambling a "tax". A tax is the
goverment taking money directly out of your pocket when you purchase a goods or
service or in the case of an income tax directly out of your paycheck.
Gambling is an individuals desire to try and convert a small amount of money
into a larger amount by taking a chance where the odds are not in your favor.
No goods or service is purchased and the individual has free choice whether or
not to "give" his money away....
State run gambling isn't a tax in any way shape or form much less a regressive
tax like a tax on food or clothing is....
Metz
|
56.486 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Tue Sep 28 1993 22:19 | 11 |
| re: /Don
Hey, if the Pats move to CT, will you and your buddy from that appeared
in SI still be allowed into the stadium?
Heck, Hartford is only a couple of hours from NJ, why not just buy a
green hat and root for a real team and give up on those shiny pants
girly mon Pats?
JoJ_the_unchained
|
56.487 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Sep 29 1993 09:22 | 17 |
| OK, Metz we'll go by your definition. But, let me add to my point.
Massachusetts recently overturned the public education system in the
state. They'll be pumping in something like $1B/yr within 5 years to
the cities and towns. Problem is, nobody knows where the money's going
to come from! As we all know, it'll most likely come from increased
taxes.
Wouldn't the money from these "floating casinos" be better used to fund
education or provide financial help to students attending state
colleges/universities?
I'd rather have my tax money go to something a bit more productive than
a domed stadium for the billionaire owner from St. Louis, thank you.
That's where I'm coming from.
Steve
|
56.488 | Go to ST. Louie and free up my TV!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Wed Sep 29 1993 09:28 | 6 |
|
Maybe after they skim their 80% adminstrative cost off the Keno money
they'll be something left for the schools. I'll bet that's the snowjob
they're selling on the hill....
mike
|
56.489 | Oh well, just Massachusetts being stupid... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 29 1993 10:25 | 30 |
| At this point I dont care if they use the money for the Domed Stadium
which by the way will bring/keep a lot more in this city then the pats.
Possible SB site, Soccer, concert, etc, etc, etc. So all the local
businesses/businesmen will benefit from this. Which in turn brings
more tax money into the state. And if they send some money towards the
school's thats even better. Bottom Line is they better get there act
together SOON... Because casion gambling is coming to Mass weather we
want it or not. The Indians (not sure which tribe or where) are
looking at several sites to put a casino on in MASSACHUSETTS. So we
get the benefit's of gambling with NO TAX DOLLARS... so lets see if I
get this straight..
1) We (the state) could put in casino's, on or around boston harbor
and use the profits directly towards building a stadium and then
continue to run/operate them bring money into the state for
other uses...
or
2) Let an Indian tribe build a casino on Indian land, they keep all
profits and dont pay taxes ??????
I dont know If im understanding this correctly anyone who doesnt
think number 1 is the way to go has more problems then anyone in
here can help them with :-)
Like Ive said before, the casino's wont premote more gambling, and now
with an Indian Tribe looking for somewhere to put one, its only a
matter of time before there's a casino anyway so why not take advantage
of it now....
If this doesnt go thru its just another wasted opputunity....
|
56.490 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 29 1993 10:47 | 4 |
| � And you don't think gambling is a regressive form of taxation?
At least with state run gambling I have a choice over whether or not
I'll be taxed.
|
56.491 | Baloney it's not a tax-- the state keeps half the money | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 29 1993 11:00 | 17 |
|
As far as I'm concerned, the part of the lottery revenues that get paid
back to bettors (maybe around 50% tops, because these lotteries are the
worst kind of suckers' bets) is not a tax, and the part that the state
keeps is. What else can you call it? It's a tax paid for the
"privilege" of gambling with the state, just like the taxes paid for
the privilege of buying cigarettes or alcohol or whatever else. It
also happens to be a whopping tax; like I said, upwards of 50% and
beyond, depending on the game. I see no difference with the lottery
just because it might be a service that some feel is the most frivolous
and discretionary activity of all (I feel the same way about
cigarettes, but I'm not going to tell cigarette smokers that they're
not paying taxes, but rather are making a "voluntary contribution" to
the state).
glenn
|
56.492 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 29 1993 11:04 | 3 |
| Glenn, nobody said it wasn't a tax. Metz and I were just pointing out
that it was a voluntary tax. Steve seemed to think it was a tax that
hit everyone.
|
56.493 | | 16039::francus | po' po' Chappy | Wed Sep 29 1993 11:20 | 7 |
| re: .489
The argument that stadiums bring in incredible amounts of revenue, leading to
more tax revenue, etc. is not that clear. A number of studies have shown that
the benefits are generally far far less than anticipated.
The Crazy Met
|
56.494 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Sep 30 1993 13:25 | 13 |
|
Word is that Zolak is getting most of the snaps in practice so
far this week (Courtesy of The Globe). The reason given is that
they want Bledsoe to rest his arm. That may or may not be true,
but I hope Parcells doesn't hesitate to go to Zolak if Bledsoe
shows once again that he can't get it done. Bill owes it to the
rest of the team and the fans up here to give us a chance at at
least one win. I realize that Bledsoe is in the midst of a learning
process but I can't see how he's gonna learn all that much getting
crumpled and tossed aside. The other thing is that the Pats have
brought in Dave Bavaro to work at inside linebacker. If they had
just drafted Jones, he could be playing inside LB and Scott could
be starting QB and we might not be enduring the agony that we are.
|
56.495 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 30 1993 13:48 | 2 |
| Parcells has 2 weeks to get ready for the next game. I'd hope he'd be
working in some of the backups.
|
56.496 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | SOMFAOLMUFA | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:23 | 4 |
| The season's shot. Go for the draft pick (and offer season ticket
holders a 20% rebate).
/Don
|
56.497 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:49 | 6 |
|
I don't think they have to "go" for the draft pick. With the talent
of this team they can play as well as they're capable of and still have
a good shot at the pick. Other than Vincent Brown and Harlowe (on a good
day), I can't think of any they have that is above average at their pos-
ition.
|
56.498 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Umgwana Cik Buudie | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:54 | 13 |
|
>> The season's shot. Go for the draft pick (and offer season ticket
>>holders a 20% rebate).
Spoken like a true season ticket holder, eh Slasher??
I agree with ya on the draft pick part, but anybody who was dumb enuf
to put the money out deserves to lose it.
(8^)
JaKe
|
56.499 | Tippett is getting old | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 30 1993 17:06 | 1 |
| Tommy you forgot our 2 Pro Bowlers -- Bruce Armstrong and Marv Cook.
|
56.500 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Sep 30 1993 17:15 | 6 |
|
Armstrong coming back from that knee injury and isn't 100% yet and Cook
seems to be in Parcells' doghouse. I think Bill believes taht little 5'10"
180 lb. guys should be receivers adn big guys like Cook should be bashers.
But as receiving tight ends go, Cook *is* above the league average so that
makes a total of three.
|
56.501 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 30 1993 17:25 | 6 |
| �I think Bill believes taht little 5'10"
� 180 lb. guys should be receivers adn big guys like Cook should be bashers.
Cook says the first thing he did after he found out Parcells was going
to be the new head coach was to request a neck brace like the other
linemen wear.
|
56.502 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Thu Sep 30 1993 17:51 | 11 |
| >
> Cook says the first thing he did after he found out Parcells was going
> to be the new head coach was to request a neck brace like the other
> linemen wear.
Yabbut, in New York Bavarro was always way up on the reception list. IN
1986 he was their bread and butter receiver....
'Saw
|
56.503 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 01 1993 10:14 | 2 |
| Yabbut, ya gotta throw sometime and with the WRs and QBs the Giants
had, it's no surprise the TE was high up on the reception list.
|
56.504 | yeah right | CNTROL::CHILDS | That SIR is an Unmitigated Fabrication | Fri Oct 01 1993 10:17 | 2 |
|
Bull, Mac!! Bavaro was up there cause Bavaro was GREAT!!!!
|
56.505 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Oct 01 1993 10:23 | 5 |
|
Bavarro was as well rounded a tight end as has been in the league in some
time. He was certainly a hell of a lot better than what we have. Given Parcells'
and Perkins' conservatism and the wr that we have, if we had someone like Mark
Bavarro, he'd be leading this team in receptions, too.
|
56.506 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Fri Oct 01 1993 10:45 | 14 |
| If you look back at the 1986 season, one thing you find over and over
was Bavaro getting open up the seam in the zone. Simms (who proved by
Super Bowl XX that he was a top echelon QB -- better than anything that
Pats have had) routinely would find him there, and hit him.
The Giants WR corps did get it done in 1986, especially McConkey in the
clutch 3rd down situations...... Bavaro was a monster, and the Giants
running game was tough too.....
That Pats could use a TE like Bavaro, thats for sure....
fw
|
56.507 | and about 25 other teams | CNTROL::CHILDS | That SIR is an Unmitigated Fabrication | Fri Oct 01 1993 11:20 | 9 |
|
>> That Pats could use a TE like Bavaro, thats for sure....
So couldn't the Jints......
mike
|
56.508 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Fri Oct 01 1993 11:22 | 4 |
| > So couldn't the Jints......
Amen......
|
56.509 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Fri Oct 01 1993 14:00 | 2 |
| Unfortunately, right now Marv Cook looks totally lost on the field. He is
obviously having trouble adjustoimg to the new offense.
|
56.510 | Bledsoe....It's Nagle '93!!! | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Sat Oct 02 1993 11:06 | 8 |
| I agree with Big Mac on the Bavarro issue...who else could Simms throw
to? Oh, I remember, that perennial pro-bowler, Phil McConkey...
re: Slasher
Drew Bledsoe <= Browning Nagle
|
56.511 | | CAM3::WAY | Jade is COOL.... | Mon Oct 04 1993 09:58 | 20 |
| > I agree with Big Mac on the Bavarro issue...who else could Simms throw
> to? Oh, I remember, that perennial pro-bowler, Phil McConkey...
Do me, JOJ.
Simms connected with Manuel quite often, but not so much on 3rd down.
I think it was Manuel, or Stacey Robinson, that Phil hit on the big
4th down play in Minnesota, late in the game which helped the Giants
turn it up another notch in that season.
As to McConkey, he was good at what he did, and he was a spark plug
for the team. What more could you ask for?
Jets self-destructed yesterday. So did the Giants.....
'Saw
|
56.512 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 04 1993 13:21 | 9 |
| According to the Worcester paper, Fran Murray has 2 stadia ready to be
built if he can buy the team from Orthwein. The CT legislature
approved a bill to fund a stadium in the Hartford area if the Pats
commit to moving there. There is a group in St. Louis willing to build
a stadium for Murray if he'll move the Pats there. Meanwhile Orthwein
is being very quiet. Massachusetts is asking for $6 mill/year plus
rent to build a stadium for Orthwein. Speculation is that after the
expansion franchises are announced there will be a bidding war between
the losers over the Pats.
|
56.513 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | GoPats. GoToStLouis,Baltimore... | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:38 | 6 |
| Denny and I were wondering if any of our southern Deccies could put
us up for the Super Bowl in Atlanta? It's obvious that after lasted
Sunday's game the Patriots will be the AFC representative. Thanks in
advance.
/Don
|
56.514 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:44 | 9 |
| > Denny and I were wondering if any of our southern Deccies could
> put us up for the Super Bowl in Atlanta? It's obvious that after
> lasted Sunday's game the Patriots will be the AFC representative.
> Thanks in advance.
And next week the 'skins fans will be figuring that they will be the Pats
opponents.
boC
|
56.515 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Come the glorious day | Wed Oct 13 1993 05:32 | 5 |
| How did Bledsoe do in the win?
I hear he got inured, but did he do anything before then?
Mike
|
56.516 | On his way?? | AD::HEATH | The jinx is broken, Sox '93 Champs | Wed Oct 13 1993 07:25 | 10 |
|
Bledsoe played allright but they where loosing when he got hurt.
Secules came in the Cards fell apart and Pats won. Bledsoe is not
putting up ROY type numbers but has shown he IS going to be a great
QB. I did hear on the tube that he won't play on Sunday against the
Houscum (is that what youze guys call them in here?), but the sprain
knee is not serious.
Jerry
|
56.517 | Need a stamp to git in (fat one preferred) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:08 | 26 |
| Hear ye... Hear ye.... Special Announcement
Patriots Look For Assistance for Halftime show....!@!!?
Yassirree,
Lisa Coles' asst PR director for the NEPATS, is looking for all
would-be Elvis impersonators to hep out with the halftime show.
Don't matter how good/bad you is, just call Lisa at WEEI or the
Stadium.
So go home and buff up yo' rhinestones, break out yo' favorite gaudy
white jumpsuit, uncrate those Vitalis and Brylcreem bottles and
git some throat spray to practice some warbling fer Sunday. No
experience necessary; but a few shots a Jack will sure help!
Don't ferget yo' Percosans, Percosetts, ups, downs and in-betweens!
Goin' home to practice
"Thank ya. Thank ya very much."
"Hunk-a-Hunk-A-Burnin' Love!"
"BaabaaBlue Blue BLue Christmas!"
How'd ah sound?
MikeL
|
56.518 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:17 | 6 |
| >How'd ah sound?
>MikeL
pathetic.
The Crazy Met
|
56.519 | -1, Then I qualify!! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:22 | 1 |
|
|
56.520 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:39 | 4 |
| Elvis impersonators at halftime? I knew this new logo would start
leading to stuff like this.
When is the San Diego chicken scheduled to make an appearance?
|
56.521 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Thu Oct 14 1993 18:17 | 6 |
|
MikeL,
You couldn't carry a tune in a bucket!
Claybone
|
56.522 | po' po' Slasher..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Fri Oct 15 1993 12:58 | 12 |
|
Yabbut Denny said that the reason slash don didn't go lasted night
was 'cause he's got a baaaad cold and since he wants ta be sure to
be able to make the Patsies game on Sunday, he was medicatin himself
with brandy.
What I wanna know, cause Denny didn't 'splain it, is who is this
babe Brandy that /don is gettin medicated from?
I remain,
Kev_for_Jed_Clampit
|
56.523 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:13 | 8 |
| � Yabbut Denny said that the reason slash don didn't go lasted night
� was 'cause he's got a baaaad cold and since he wants ta be sure to
� be able to make the Patsies game on Sunday, he was medicatin himself
� with brandy.
I hear that /Don, 'Saw, and ACChris are teaming up on a writing project
-- The Excuse Bible. It will be a quick desktop reference to explain
yourself out of any situation.
|
56.524 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:15 | 5 |
| Sad but true Kev, given a choice between a ::SPROTS GitTogether and
the HaplessPats, the HaplessPats (Elvis Halftime Show and all) get the
nod. No offense (appropriate phrase for the Patriots' Note).
/Don
|
56.525 | Yabbut cain ya describe brandy for po' po 'Saw? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:19 | 1 |
|
|
56.526 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:30 | 8 |
| The NFL Suits fined Corwin Brown $3,500 dollars for a perfectly
legal hit on Derek Ware. I guess the litmus test for whether a hit is
legal, is not if you use the crown of your helmet when delivering the blow
(Brown didn't), but whether the player hit (the hittee), is knocked out of
the game. Good thing they didn't do this when Donnie Shell played, 'cuz he
never would've made any money playing this game.
/Don
|
56.527 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:33 | 11 |
| � The NFL Suits fined Corwin Brown $3,500 dollars for a perfectly
�legal hit on Derek Ware. I guess the litmus test for whether a hit is
�legal, is not if you use the crown of your helmet when delivering the blow
�(Brown didn't), but whether the player hit (the hittee), is knocked out of
�the game.
I was amazed at the Boston sportscaster who likened this hit to the one
that paralyzed Darryl Stingley.
I wonder if Brown would have been fined if the hit was against somebody
besides a Cardinal.
|
56.528 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:35 | 12 |
|
And the Cardinals all agree that the hit was legal. Hey, it could be
worse. Cecil got fined 30K for two VERY similar hits. He's got a
bigger rep though. Could you hear the Cardinals fans chanting "thirty
thousand dollars" after Brown's hit? It was funny.
Credit should be given to the Cards and Redskins (Cecil's hits) for not
whining about it the way the folks in Philly did.
They're trying to turn the NFL into soccer.
boC
|
56.529 | more Denny..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:45 | 13 |
|
Yabbut and Denny said that he also head that somebody with the Pats
said that he was gonna bring one of the "NFL bonecrunching hits" videos
they're selling with him and show it to them!
Seems that there might be a bit of hypocracy with the NFL, hawking
bone crunching stuff to the unwashed masses and also fining a guy for a
bonecrusher play!
I remain,
wondering what Mr. G Rillar would do?
Kev
|
56.530 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Fri Oct 15 1993 13:48 | 5 |
|
Hey, the NFL gets money both ways. Fine the players, then sell the
tape.
nutting wrong wif dat!
|
56.531 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:01 | 9 |
| Patrick Forte, the vice president of football operations is
supposedly going to include "NFL Rocks" with his appeal of the fine on
Brown. The Suits are trying to convince the SortOfFan that when played
within certain rules, subject to change weekly, injuries won't happen.
Of course anybody who knows anything about football knows this is
folly. It's a violent game and people are going to get hurt, if this
aspect turns you off then watch Disney On Ice or a soccer match.
/Don
|
56.532 | small nit | MKFSA::LONG | DEC, get outa VN, NOW! | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:37 | 7 |
| re fines:
Brews, I believe the fines levied against the players, and the teams
for that matter, are donated to charites.
billl
|
56.533 | nfl mgtment = sleazes | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Oct 15 1993 14:49 | 12 |
| Who's to say this isn't simply nfl using publicity from fines to
advertise their game. Main argument against that is to say that nfl is
not that sleazy. Weak argument.
And I am somewhat concerned with the way spreads are going vis a vis
eventual results. Denver - GB last sunday is latest game where unusual
spread is followed by favored team going crazy. It was an understated
fact that the main reason nfl wanted instant replay was because of the
need for control where so much gambling was going on.
Call it just a feeling or just sour grapes over my poor prognosticating
lately - tho I'm still surviving koh
|
56.534 | | DECWET::METZGER | Ask me if I care. | Fri Oct 15 1993 15:22 | 13 |
|
I saw a really neat helmet the other day on TV that has an airbag collar on it
that deploys when the impact is made with the crown of the head. It's supposed
to take up to 500lbs of pressure off the spine.
All you have to do is wait until a crucial play. Whpa somebody on top of the
head with the foreign object hidden in your trousers deploying the airbag
and making them sit out a play to get a new helmet....The NFL would rival the
WWF and Conrad dobler and his bag of cheap tricks could make a comeback...
It's perfect...
Metz
|
56.535 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Mon Oct 18 1993 13:13 | 7 |
| UGH! The worst thing that happened to the Pats was Commander Cody
getting hurt. Houston's 3 million dollar backup was about the only hope
the Pats had. He threw more bad passes than a nerd in a single's bar.
I didn't figure Moon to miss wide open receivers. Boy I bet the Dolphins
wish they had Secules now (I wish they did).
/Don
|
56.536 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 19 1993 13:54 | 4 |
| The Pats snatched another defeat from the jaws of victory. I couldn't
believe the announcers saying what a great game Cody Carlson was
playing until he got hurt. If the Pats' DBs had hands we woulda seen
Cody benched and the Pats with a decent lead.
|
56.537 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Tue Oct 19 1993 18:02 | 11 |
| Hey BigMac who was the announcer? Namath? Something was wrong
with Cody prior to his going down because before that offensive series
Moon was warming up. Then Carlson came limping off the bench and
started to throw to Warren. I thought the whole ice throwing incident
between Jeffries and Gilbride was directed at the referees, course we
had the offensive lineman and their big butts shielding most of the
Houston bench from our view. Man the way the Pats are playing those
three December/January games (two after major holidays) are looking
pretty tough. Here's hoping for warm weather at least.
/Don
|
56.538 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 19 1993 18:07 | 12 |
| � Hey BigMac who was the announcer? Namath?
No, somebody and that ex-Raider TE.
�Something was wrong
� with Cody prior to his going down because before that offensive series
� Moon was warming up.
Carlson suffered a pulled groin on his TD scramble. He got taped up
while the Pats had the ball. He went out for the next series but had
to come out when he found out the hard way he couldn't plant on that
leg and throw.
|
56.539 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | P.C.Beavis&ButtHead-ChangeIt!!! | Tue Oct 19 1993 18:30 | 5 |
| Todd C? Boy does that guy love the sound of his own voice. Cripes
I was better off sitting in the drizzle than having to listen to that
cacophonous claptrap.
/Don
|
56.540 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 19 1993 18:47 | 7 |
| � Todd C? Boy does that guy love the sound of his own voice. Cripes
� I was better off sitting in the drizzle than having to listen to that
� cacophonous claptrap.
Yeah, Christianson. He did come up with some beauts. 3 or 4 penalty
flags being thrown on one play was described as a "cascade of amber
linen". Sheesh.
|
56.541 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thems that die are the lucky ones | Wed Oct 20 1993 11:22 | 3 |
|
Charlie Jones was working with Todd...what a team....love to listen to Todd
do Donkey games....
|
56.542 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Wed Oct 20 1993 14:21 | 12 |
| I'm sure you do Mike since you both are anti's!
I did like one of Deirdorks coments the other night.
Elway has been harrassed all night, maybe he should tell his linemen
to put on rear view mirrors so they can see whats happening behind
them.
It was a great slam to the donk OL that wasn't playing. Maybe
Elway pissed 'em off. Na, that would never happen (-).
Tim
|
56.543 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Livin' in the fridge... | Wed Oct 20 1993 18:18 | 4 |
| Namath wasn't hired thised year. I loved when Sean was talking about
something the other night and used the word "pah-lay" instead of
"play". He then declared: "I'm slipping into my Joe Namath
impression"...
|
56.544 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Thu Oct 21 1993 20:36 | 22 |
| I was in the process of taking a late lunch this afternoon and
listening to Eddie Anvilhead. He was in a tither about the offensive
lineman for Houston who took Sunday's game off against the Patsies to
be with his wife who was giving birth. Well old Eddie was calling the
fact that the Oilers didn't pay the guy for Sunday's game typical
neanderthal NFL mentality, when who should decide to call but my old
::SPROTS adversary DocQuixote� Couldn't mistake that voice of his.
Well Doc was taking his usual stance against the Oilers management
but, honest to God, he praised the Boston press for not pandering to
management of the local teams when such issues arise here, unlike in
Houston. Typically for Doc he dragged on and on, but Eddie took a real
liking to him and suggested some local restaurants where Doc could get
some Texas-style barbequed ribs (guess he's off his meatless/health kick).
I must confess that I felt a pang of regret that the good Doctor
is not here in notes so I could take him to the woodshed just one more
time on the RUSSELL vs. chamberlain debate. I really miss him and all
the other agigtators who have left our notes brotherhood for bigger and
better things (in some instances).
/Don
|
56.545 | I'm flabbergasted! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 22 1993 11:05 | 13 |
|
> Well Doc was taking his usual stance against the Oilers management
> but, honest to God, he praised the Boston press for not pandering to
> management of the local teams when such issues arise here, unlike in
> Houston.
What a brown-noser that DrM is. ;-) Praising a stooge like Eddie
Anvilhead and his Boston media cohorts for not pandering to local teams
(did the word "Celtics" come up in this conversation?). Hahahahahahaha.
I've heard it all now...
glenn
|
56.546 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Fri Oct 22 1993 12:29 | 9 |
| Actually yes Glenn, I'm paraphrasing what Doc said, but is was
something like "When the Red Sox, Patriots or Celtics pull a stunt like
this the media doesn't let them off the hook like the Houston press
does the Oilers". But to give credit where credit is due, Doc actually
came up with a rib-tickler when Eddie was explaining that good Texas
barbeque is hard to find up here Doc said he doesn't go looking for
good clam chowder in Houston either.
/Don
|
56.547 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Livin' in the fridge... | Fri Oct 22 1993 17:58 | 5 |
| Doc eats meat, just not pork... last I heard anyway...
Just like him to suck up to Eddie though. Probably thought there
was a free Reebok shirt to go with it...
|
56.548 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Mon Oct 25 1993 11:59 | 4 |
| Ugh! The Patriots should have a new slogan for this year "Losing
Ugly".
/Don
|
56.549 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Mon Oct 25 1993 12:05 | 6 |
| Nice seeing you /er and the boys at Partners Pub... And thanks for the
drinks they were the best....FREE!!!!!!!!! It was an UGLY lose...
I still have not heard of any "kicking" tryouts as of today... :-]
REK
|
56.550 | Wins are ugly too | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:14 | 4 |
| I thought all the the patsies games were ugly losses?
Ti
|
56.551 | | QUASER::HUNTER | How Do You Spell Win... G L Y N | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:30 | 6 |
|
Slasher... I feel for ya buddy... I for one thought the
Patsies would have been doing much better this year than
they have... Like 2 wins at least !!! HA!!!!
BG
|
56.552 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:32 | 5 |
| /er wouldn't have any sympathy for you, no need to give him any.
HtH,
The Crazy Met
|
56.553 | Could be worse BigGame, I could be a Mets fan... | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:57 | 1 |
|
|
56.554 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:06 | 5 |
| little consolation /er. Pats have been worse than the Mets over
the last decade (Mets won something and competed for most of the time).
And at least with the Mets they don't have games in 20 degree weather.
The Crazy Met
|
56.555 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 10:54 | 5 |
| Agreed Craze, the Pats have stunk as much as the Mets have choked
in the last ten years. By the way we mainly football fan types happen
to think that 20� fahrenheit is pretty balmy.
/Don
|
56.556 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 28 1993 10:59 | 6 |
| > By the way we mainly football fan types happen
> to think that 20� fahrenheit is pretty balmy.
while most folks would call this insanity.
The Crazy Met
|
56.557 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thems that die are the lucky ones | Thu Oct 28 1993 11:05 | 8 |
|
>> By the way we mainly football fan types happen
>> to think that 20� fahrenheit is pretty balmy.
and all this time I thought playing in 20 degree weather was to keep the
beer cold...........
mike
|
56.558 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 11:59 | 4 |
| It does save on ice costs Mike. Hey Craze, you baseball/soccer
types wouldn't understand...
/Don
|
56.559 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 28 1993 12:14 | 3 |
| /er some things ar not worth understanding ...
The Crazy Met
|
56.560 | Grass brought to you at Foxboro courtesy a the soccer types... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 28 1993 12:20 | 12 |
|
> Hey Craze, you baseball/soccer types wouldn't understand...
That's right, we discriminating consumers demand that the games be
played on god's green grass and under god's blue sky. If it were
anything but I wouldn't even bother waiting to see how good the
tailgating is. Besides, /er, just because the Patriots move doesn't
mean you can't still tailgate in Foxboro. I'm sure if you ask nicely
Eddie Anvilhead'll still let you do it for the $10... ;-)
glenn
|
56.561 | Curious | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Fri Oct 29 1993 13:07 | 6 |
| TCM,
Since you can't handle the mainly cold, does this mean you own an
electric blanket?
Tim
|
56.562 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:01 | 4 |
| nope, never had an electric blanket.
The Crazy Met
|
56.563 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | DoNotDemeanCuzWeGrowCorn!! | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:24 | 7 |
| � nope, never had an electric blanket.
� The Crazy Met
How 'bout jammies with bunny rabbit feets then?
/Don
|
56.564 | featuring Wonder Woman as Pat Riley | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:52 | 1 |
| He has Knickerboxers Underroos(tm)
|
56.565 | Rams to possibly move to Baltimore? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 01 1993 10:21 | 12 |
| As this relates to NE Pats it may be good news in that one out of town
prospective bidder will be taken care of.
That leaves Memphis and Jacksonville as possible homes for pats.
The Rams originally were in the All America Conference and possibly
were originally in Baltimore. In the late 40s when I was more
interested in Kukla Fran and Ollie (did I hear they were making a
comback?) there were a couple of attempts at a rvial league to nfl and
the final result were the Baltimore,Rams,Browns and one other nfl team
(Pitt?).
|
56.566 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Nov 01 1993 11:01 | 5 |
| � The Rams originally were in the All America Conference and possibly
� were originally in Baltimore. In the late 40s when I was more
Rams were originally in Cleveland. Colts were originally in Dallas. Dunno if
Baltimore had a team.
|
56.567 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Au revoir NAFTA | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:25 | 7 |
| You know, when Zolak was warming up yesterday I really thought that
Parcells was going to swallow his pride and put him in. Next week
against Buffalo the quality of the opposition will be considerably
greater than it has been the last two weeks (when the Pats actually
looked like they could've won).
/Don
|
56.568 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:32 | 10 |
|
I could understand why Parcells might not want to take Bledsoe out
if the kid was struggling. After all, Drew is supposed to be our qb
of the future and you want him to learn and get some confidence and
realistically we aren't going to the playoffs anyways. But Secules
is just a backup. If he ain't doing the job then yank his butt out
of there and give Zolak a shot. Z-man certainly would be hard pressed
to do worse than that spirit-killing INT in the endzone. It's painfully
obvious why Miami let Secules go. What's not so obvious is why Parcells
is in love wuth the guy.
|
56.569 | | MKFSA::LONG | DEC, get outa VN, NOW! | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:42 | 17 |
| I watched most of this game, while reading the new insurance options,
(Rip Van Winkle got nuthin' on me) and saw that glare Parcells gave
Sisson after he missed a field goal. Wow, if looks could kill.
Then "noclue" Secules tosses an inti in the endzone and he gets a
pat on the butt from "The New England Messiah", otherwise known as
Bill Parcells. What IS this guy's problem with Zolak? I know,
everyone keeps talking about the "attitude" thing, but I really
find it hard to believe that a coach of Parcells' supposed caliber
is carrying this grudge this long. It's no wonder Zolak has an
attitude! Wouldn't you?
Turner continued to look good. The defense gets a B- from me.
A step up, but there's still room for improvement.
billl
|
56.570 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Au revoir NAFTA | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:49 | 10 |
| Well Billl, aparently Zolak's problem is he too free a spirit for
the coach. According to the Globe both defensive coordinator Al Groh and
Maurice Hurst are hinting that the problem here certainly isn't the defense.
Hey guys, who gave up game winning drives late in the fourth quarter the
last two games, Secules, the offense? If you hold the Bills to 9 points then
you can crow, but Seattle and Indianapolis don't exacltly bring back
memories of the Montana 49ers or the Fouts Chargers. Hey like the paper
said, even Rod Rust won against the Colts!
/Don
|
56.571 | Pretty soon Channel 4 might start paying to black out games... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 01 1993 12:59 | 12 |
|
These games like New England-Seattle and New England-Indy are so bad
that it's almost purely academic that someone even gets the "W". You
might as well watch the games looking just for the good and bad points
and put the final score at a priority somewhere down around which team
has the uglier uniform. That the Indy fans were cascading the field
with boos as their QB was kneeling down to run out the clock on a
*victory* speaks volumes about the quality of play (and Indy fans
aren't exactly known for Philadelphia-like dispositions...)
glenn
|
56.572 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:00 | 6 |
|
What you guys are finding out is that Bill Parcells loves Bill Parcells
and Bill's never wrong. To admit Secules sucks would be to admit he was
wrong......
mike
|
56.573 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:09 | 9 |
|
>> These games like New England-Seattle and New England-Indy are so bad
>> that it's almost purely academic that someone even gets the "W".
It may be academic to the casual viewer but it ain't academic to Pats
fans at least not this one. I'd rather have an ugly win than a pretty
loss. Of course, what we're getting lately is butt ugly losses. I want
to see some wins. I don't expect a whole lot of 'em but I'd like to see
a few and screw the aesthetics.
|
56.574 | Just venting | MAYES::MAILLOUX | | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:18 | 12 |
|
Yesterday listening to the post game show on the radio, Gino or
maybe it was Gil Santo commented on how well Sisson was booming
field goals through the uprights from 60 yards out! What I want
to know is what the hell is he trying to prove? I mean when was
the last time they tried a 60 yard field goal...I would think
especially with his consistency, that he should set up some place
around the forty where 85% of attempts come from anyway, and
practice more realistic game situations. Also this comparison
thing with Bledsoe and Mirer, what you have to remember is Mirer
is two years older than Bledsoe. That's a big difference at this
stage in their careers. Plus Mirer has REAL receivers to throw to.
|
56.575 | remedial arithmetic for parcells etal | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:53 | 18 |
| I heard something about the colts fans booing their team running out
the clock for the victory. I was listening as pats wasted their final
time out and as soon as the interception occurred knew it was over
since this wasn't Michigan-Illinois.
Apparently the spread not being covered was the reason for the boos or
else fans want to get the full 60 minutes worth.
Perhaps instead of having the qb drop to a knee they should just
concede at the point where defense has no timeouts to cover remaining
seconds. Patriots need to learn to save those timeouts but apparently
they had [just] called them on the last plays of colt's possession.
The problem with use of timeouts at the end of the game is that it
takes fourth grade level arithmetic and where in the world are
you going to find a football coach with that type of math. ability.
bill
|
56.576 | Just stay in New England... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 01 1993 13:58 | 14 |
| Another Missed FG and another close loss.. Is it the offense or the
defense ? The Detroit, both seattle games and now this one were all
in reach of the offense and at least 2 of them should have been won.
And in all these close games there were missed FG and INT in the red
zone... so is it the offense's fault, you bet your a$$, but should
the defense be offended, excited or mouthing off, I dont think so
seeing that theyve givin up more pts then any other defense in the
AFC (only the Rams and Falcons have givin up more pts). Id say thats
no reason to seek praise...
They need a new owner and less distractions (and write off this year).
They are still rebuilding, longest rebuild process Ive ever seen...
MaB
|
56.577 | QB problems again. | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:04 | 9 |
| This team needs a Legitamate QB. They have all rookies or 2nd string backups
at the reigns. Lets get us a veteran, to show the youngsters a thing or two.
There's know to learn from. I think if Hugh Millen was QB this year the pats
would have 3-4 wins. Secules is not gonna get the job done and Zolak had
2 dream games last year, and that's it.
They have some quality offensive players they just need a solid QB to lead them.
|
56.578 | From Tampa Bay! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:38 | 5 |
|
re .-1 Steve DeBerg is available :-)
Kevin
|
56.579 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:12 | 6 |
| Kevin,
Shush up! The next thing ya know, we'll be watching DeBerg
hobbling around at Foxboro. 8-)>
Scott
|
56.580 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:22 | 13 |
|
Parcells isn't about to bring in any veteran QBs. I'm not happy
that he's continuing to play Secules but at least this coach and
front office aren't looking for any quick fixes and panicking when
something doesn't seem to work. We weren't going to the playoffs
this year. We probably won't next year either. But we can over the
next few years build a team that will be successful for several years.
That's what Parcells is attempting to do. You need only look at how
many players he's let go and how none of them have caught on anywhere
else to realize that the guy knows talent and we didn't very much of it.
I'd like some wins as much as any Pats fan but for now I'll give Bill
the benefit of the doubt. I think he knows a little more about football
than I do. It'd be pretty damned said if he didn't.
|
56.581 | Another ASU guy... | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:16 | 5 |
| Best news I heard all day was Singleton getting the gate. Half their
1st round picks in the last 10 years are gone. Our sincere thanks to
Steinberg, Mendes and the biggest stiff of the bunch, Jankovich.
Steve
|
56.582 | don't be badmouthin the Droods, they'll get ya! | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:18 | 1 |
| Stop it now, Steve. Singleton was a Mildcat.
|
56.583 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:02 | 1 |
| I told you guys to hang in there with Leonard Russell.
|
56.584 | Leonard "forward lateral" Russell ;-) | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Nov 03 1993 15:52 | 1 |
|
|
56.585 | | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Tue Nov 09 1993 08:54 | 9 |
| Heard on the way to work this morning...
Patriots named their new team doctor...
Dr. Jack Kavorkian
|
56.586 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 09 1993 09:34 | 1 |
| Parcells has invited a couple of kickers for tryouts this week.
|
56.587 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | I'llTakePerotAndGiveThePoints | Tue Nov 09 1993 10:40 | 9 |
| At least we got Patriettes' Cheerleader posters after the game.
Hey Mike Childs, what did you think of the Foxboro "mob" cheering
Secules' injury? 8^) And speaking of that, the way Cornelius was
carrying on you would've thought that the "mob" was saying stuff about
his mother or something. Course I can understand him and the rest of
the Bills wanting Secules to stay in the game. He was an asset, for
Buffalo!
/Don
|
56.588 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Nov 09 1993 12:09 | 10 |
|
I wasn't surprised Don. I was there against Seattle when they booed Grogan
off the field and annointed Tony Eason as a saint. I then saw said "Saint"
doused with beer going into the tunnel when he turned out to be another
Grogan...
I said C's fans Don. Whole different mentality from Pats fan although many
are the same....
mike
|
56.589 | trying out Kickers | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Sales gets commisions we get "JACK" | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:16 | 2 |
| What position are these kickers going to play ILB ? Free Safety ?
|
56.590 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Go Boston University! | Mon Nov 22 1993 12:24 | 9 |
| Hey Tommy Brydie! Did you happen to catch IRVING FRYAR's game
winning touchdown reception yesterday afternoon? Or maybe you saw the ESPN
clip of FRYAR's devastating block on a Higgs (I think), touchdown last
Sunday against the Eagles. He remains the consumate professional, doing
whatever it takes to put his team on the plus side of the scoreboard every
Sunday. Congratulations to IRVING and a Bronx cheer to the Patriots for
letting such a team oriented player leave their midst.
/Don
|
56.591 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 23 1993 11:05 | 9 |
|
Yeah, I saw Irving on Sunday. Big deal, he beat the Pats' secondary for
a long bomb. He'll choke in a big game just like he always does.
BTW - Pats fans forget about Marshall Faulk. If you want to talk running
back the best one in the country will be playing against FSU Saturday
in the person of Eric Rhett from Florida. Even so, I wouldn't take
either one of those two over JJ Stokes, receiever from UCLA, if he
forgoes his senior year.
|
56.592 | | MKFSA::LONG | Help! I've lost my OBL and can't get up! | Tue Nov 23 1993 11:12 | 10 |
| Do you really think they'll go after another "franchise" player?
How many "boy he's going to be great in a couple years" rookies
can one program endure. I expect them to look to make drastic
improvements at the running back position. However, it will
probably come from a "proven" veteran.
Just my hunch.
billl
|
56.593 | Gee thanks coach!! | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Tue Nov 23 1993 11:16 | 6 |
|
I petty the proven veteran getting traded to the pats, whomever
he may be!!
Cadzilla2
|
56.594 | | MKFSA::LONG | Help! I've lost my OBL and can't get up! | Tue Nov 23 1993 11:19 | 4 |
| Could be worse. He could be sent to Cincinati!
billl
|
56.595 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 23 1993 11:26 | 10 |
|
>> I petty the proven veteran getting traded to the pats, whomever
>> he may be!!
Anyone who has watched this team knows that it's a comer. It's
the second youngest team in the league, they've only been blown
out once and they have an excellent, young offensive line. I don't
think it's any exagerration to say that we're two or three players
from being a playoff team. And maybe even less players than that.
|
56.596 | bring back Cookie Gilcrest | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Tue Nov 23 1993 12:00 | 11 |
|
How many times will we here that this team is a comer!! This franchise
has never had a winning tradition and would not how to develop one if their
life depended on it. Its been more of a tax writeoff for the owner than a good
team. They ran off the only coach they had that made it to the big show. They've
let the good players they had get away because they were to cheap to pay them.
Parcells may be a good coach, but his record has been proven with some
great team players, and not what he has now.
Cadzilla2
|
56.597 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Tue Nov 23 1993 14:18 | 38 |
| � in the person of Eric Rhett from Florida. Even so, I wouldn't take
� either one of those two over JJ Stokes, receiever from UCLA, if he
� forgoes his senior year.
Agreed, since receiver is the possibly the weakest position on the
team. We can only hope that Stokes is as productive and half the
competitor that the guy the Patriots let the Dolphins steal was.
� Anyone who has watched this team knows that it's a comer. It's
� the second youngest team in the league, they've only been blown
� out once and they have an excellent, young offensive line. I don't
� think it's any exagerration to say that we're two or three players
� from being a playoff team. And maybe even less players than that.
How did that Who song go, "Won't get fooled again". Watching these
"close losses" brings back terrible "deja v�" images. Last game of the
1966 season, all the Pats needed to do was beat a less talented Jests team
and they tie Buffalo for the AFL East crown. The Jesters led by a young
Namath and Emerson Boozer crush them. Losing a playoff spot in 1980 due to
a loss to the then, 5 win San Francisco 49ers. The 1974 6-1 start followed
by a 1-6 finish. The seemingly dozens of losses late in the season in
Miami to seal their "close but not quite" fate. It goes on and on. And we
really don't want to discuss the one time they did come close to football's
Holy Grail, do we? If Parcells really wants to break this "almost" syndrome
he could start by hiring better offensive and defensive coordinators.
Parcells never had to do both the job of coach and general manager.
He had a tremendous GM in New York, regardless of what the Midget fans and
tabloid press would have you believe. Now that he has the added
responsibilites he needs to hire talented coordinators on both sides of
the ball and then give them the freedom to operate. Ray Perkins is living
proof that ability is not a high priority item when selecting a coach.
My guess is that his most marketable trait is the ability to plant his lips
firmly on Parcells' ample posterior. Bill needs to lighten up on the reins
and get some new talent to help run the show, or it'll be the same old same
old for the Patriots.
/Don
|
56.598 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Nov 23 1993 20:50 | 6 |
| re: .597
/er did you confuse the Patriots with the Red Sox? hahahaha
The Crazy Met
|
56.599 | This is a decent team to watch... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Nov 24 1993 16:12 | 23 |
| Well were use to seeing the pats lose and lose big. In the past we
couldnt even say what if we had a FG kicker who could hit a bldg from
10 yrds out... Face it this pats team has lost 6 games by a combined
17pts and in just those games Sisson missed 6FG (18pts). So the
statement that there a few good players away is very credible. If
say Morten Anderson was playing in NE I feel pretty confident that
they would be more like 6-4 or somewhere along those lines. Sisson
has cost this team alot. Im not sure how to look at this team. With
a great Kicker they could be a borderline Playoff team (Under the
circumstance's theyve been in so far this season) but they would
have a middle of the pack type draft pick. Sisson and Sisson alone
has been in position to tie or win 4 games and blew them. And how
many times did the pats punt instead of attempting a 50yrd FG ?????
I hope Sisson comes around and finishes up the season strong, he seems
to have a strong leg just no confidence. Think about it, there coming
ohh so close, if Sisson snaps out of it, they get the kicker they
thought they drafted :-), a low draft pick, plenty of money to spend
in the Free Agent Market and a 5th round pick... Next year will be fun
in Foxboro :-) (I think I'll attend a few next year before they start
selling out).
mab
|
56.600 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | John Elway is so YUMMY!!! | Wed Nov 24 1993 17:37 | 4 |
| Good teams find a way to win, bad teams find a way to lose.
JaKe
|
56.601 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Elway for MVP? | Wed Nov 24 1993 17:55 | 4 |
| AGreed, look how Denver lost to Muffalo in the AFC champeenchip game
2 years ago. Had to depend on FG's, which 3 or so were missed.
Tim
|
56.602 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Wed Nov 24 1993 20:14 | 7 |
| The Pats sip, big time. Fryar is great, and they miss him. Who replaced
him? Brisby? HAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, they're up and coming...next year they'll win 2 games. Then
Parcells will retire again, and they'll hire Lou Holtz.
JoJ_NOT
|
56.603 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 10:32 | 5 |
| How often does a team have a runner rack up around 120 yards in a game
and lose?
According to yesterday's NBC broadcast duo, Parcells says his first
priority in the draft is a running back.
|
56.604 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 29 1993 10:44 | 18 |
| >
> How often does a team have a runner rack up around 120 yards in a game
> and lose?
>
I dunno.
I think if the Pats didn't fumble, then you figure they might have won.
> According to yesterday's NBC broadcast duo, Parcells says his first
> priority in the draft is a running back.
Yep. I don't doubt that. Parcells doesn't have the kind of runner he
wants on the team....
'Saw
|
56.605 | Johnson of Northern Illinois could be better | 16421::HEISER | but I *like* it!!! | Mon Nov 29 1993 11:27 | 6 |
| Re: Marshall Faulk
It definitely wouldn't hurt the Pats to take a look at LeRon ( or is it
LeWon?) Johnson (Northern Illinois). Afterall, he's only the 4th back
ever to rush for 2,000 yards in the NCAA. I'm curious to see how he does
in the Senior Bowl against Division 1 talent.
|
56.606 | another close but no cigars... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:07 | 9 |
| Is weatley still around, isnt he more of the Parcells type RB ?
If they end up with the #1 pick, I hope they trade down a few
and grab weatley and let faulk go else where...
Garrison Hearst didnt cut it, but the power backs are doing ok
this year...
mab
|
56.607 | Just say no to Tyrone Wheatley, please... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:07 | 31 |
|
At the risk of taking another beating about it, I still like Marshall
Faulk over the other running backs. He adds another dimension with his
demonstrated ability to catch the ball out of SDSU's pro-style offense.
Yes, I happen to believe he's the real thing in the mold of the
Barry Sanders/Emmitt Smith-type back. I did hear that ESPN geek Fred
Edelstein pushing Wheatley as Parcell's type of back and projecting
him as the Pats' selection, leaving Faulk to someone else (forget who)
in the top three picks, and I hope that doesn't come off. For one
thing, for a supposed power back, Wheatley has been awfully injury
prone. Faulk has been more durable. To be honest, I still haven't
heard anything about the pro prospects of Tommy's guy Errict Rhett,
and he might be right up there in the scouts' opinions even though he
did take the big KOD hit in Saturday's game with FSU.
Right now the Pats probably need the top-notch WR more than the RB but
I'm not sure there's a player available who can provide the same
impact. It seems that as far as projected NFL success goes, WR is a
position where sleepers emerge from the draft more than at RB, and can
be had with lower picks. J.J. Stokes might be the guy but with a #1
or #2 pick you'd better be damned sure of the guy, because unless he
turns out to be truly great, the solid single player at WR just does
not deliver play-in, play-out contributions that a RB, defensive
player, or even offensive lineman does. Still, if he's the choice,
I'd rather roll the dice with Stokes as the impact offensive player
the Pats so desperately need than trade down (unlike with past
adminstrations I think Parcells realizes this and has faith in his
ability to draft talent in the middle rounds).
glenn
|
56.608 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:20 | 11 |
|
Don't worry Glenn, when was the last time Edlestein was right? Didn't the
Patriots take Fryar #1? Could be gun shy on Stokes but given the relaxing
of all the passing rules he should be the pick. Trouble is Parcells still
thinks like the ancient ones and wants to run.....Also Parcells did it with
a small back (Joe Morris) and a big back (OJ Anderson) so how can anyone
say what type of back is his type...one thing for certain it's somebody
who runs with their head up looking for more yardage instead of bowling
through there like Russell....
mike
|
56.609 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:28 | 12 |
| � Don't worry Glenn, when was the last time Edlestein was right? Didn't the
� Patriots take Fryar #1?
Yeah and although Parcells would never admit it, he's probably kicking
himself for trading him to Miami.
�one thing for certain it's somebody
� who runs with their head up looking for more yardage instead of bowling
� through there like Russell....
Yeah that Russell, what a bum. He was only able to rack up 120+ yards
yesterday and is averaging close to 5 yards a carry.
|
56.610 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:35 | 17 |
| >
> Yeah that Russell, what a bum. He was only able to rack up 120+ yards
> yesterday and is averaging close to 5 yards a carry.
>
Yeah, but if those 120 yards are all between the 30s, it don't do you
much good.
Besides, he's basically the ONLY back the Patriots have, at least the
only one I've seen.
The Giants, when Parcells was there, tended to have a couple of different
backs, all very capable. I think he'd like a little bit of depth there....
'Saw
|
56.611 | Still need a huge guy who can rush the passer | LEAF::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:39 | 13 |
| Russell yesterday: 147 yards, 27 carries, 5.4 ave.
Russell hasn't fumbled since the third game of the season, and has
had some excellent games when Parcells & Co. have let him run the
ball. I'd love to see Marshall Faulk, but I'd prefer a big subhuman
defensive end who could pressure the QB.
With the Pats about $11 million under the proposed salary cap, I would
think Parcells will go after an experienced safety and wide receiver,
overpay for them both, and still have enough money to satisfy everyone
he wants to keep on the current roster (Brown, Coates, Turner, Goad).
NAZZ
|
56.612 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:41 | 14 |
| �Yeah, but if those 120 yards are all between the 30s, it don't do you
�much good.
Whose fault is that?
�Besides, he's basically the ONLY back the Patriots have, at least the
�only one I've seen.
Of course, that's because you're busy watching the Giants on CBS.
The Pats are pretty deep at RB with Croom, Turner, et.al. Heck, they
cut/traded 2 RBs this season. I will admit they don't have a
Foster/Sanders type back, but only Pittsburgh and Buffalo do. If they
could get Faulk and move Russell to FB that would make for quite a
backfield.
|
56.613 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:43 | 4 |
| It really is frustrating watching the Pats pile up the yards on the
ground only to watch them get stuffed on 3rd or 4th and 1. Why not
call one of those plays that got you the 8 or 9 yards to get you to 3rd
and 1?
|
56.614 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:48 | 3 |
| > The Pats are pretty deep at RB with Croom, Turner, et.al. Heck, they
Yea, a coupla real studs there...
|
56.615 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:51 | 15 |
| > It really is frustrating watching the Pats pile up the yards on the
> ground only to watch them get stuffed on 3rd or 4th and 1. Why not
> call one of those plays that got you the 8 or 9 yards to get you to 3rd
> and 1?
Situations are different perhaps.
One thing that Parcells really blew yesterday was going for it on 4th
down and putting the punt team in there. I think he should have just
bellied up to the bar and gone with the offense.....
'Saw
|
56.616 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:55 | 6 |
| �One thing that Parcells really blew yesterday was going for it on 4th
�down and putting the punt team in there. I think he should have just
�bellied up to the bar and gone with the offense.....
When? On the QB sneak with the punt team?
|
56.617 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:55 | 2 |
| Parcells is still on his honeymoon in this town. MacPherson and Berry
were run out of town despite better performances than this.
|
56.618 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Mon Nov 29 1993 14:03 | 6 |
|
if the Russell ran with his head up Mac he'd have had 200 yards....he's
a punishing runner but not a game breaker and a team that can't get into
the endzone needs a gamebreaker...
mike
|
56.619 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 14:15 | 5 |
| His head doesn't have anything to do with it, Mike. He's doing a good
job of hitting the holes and picking up the extra yards by running to
daylight. He just doesn't have the speed to outrun the defense so when
they catch up to him he puts his head down and tries to get a little
more.
|
56.620 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 29 1993 14:17 | 4 |
| So a Joe Morris style runner would complement him and improve the
ground game.....
'Saw
|
56.621 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 29 1993 14:23 | 3 |
| Didn't say it wouldn't, 'Saw. In fact I said something very similar a
couple of replies back. I just question that another running back
should be the Pats' No.1 priority.
|
56.622 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Tue Nov 30 1993 07:49 | 13 |
| HAHAHAAHAAAA...the Pats are DEEP at RB???? Haaawwwww
Don't get a chubby over Russell's game on Sunday. I think the weather
had alot to do with it. In that weather, even a guy like Nick Bell
could run for 100 yds.
re: Mike
I heard Parcells on he FAN awhile back. He said he prefers the big
backs. In fact, he said he wouldn't have drafted Barry Sanders over
Hampton.
JoJ_NOT
|
56.623 | There is too much negativism over the Pats' current state | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:14 | 24 |
|
> The squad of very little talent had 2 Rookies of the Year (one of who
> was traded and is I think out of football now), a Pro Bowl tightend
> (who is hardly used as a receiver under the Parcells regime), a #1
> draftpick at QB, several first round picks in the OL, a pro-bowler
> (coming off knee surgery) in the OL, and 2 LBs with Pro Bowl
> experience. I think the lack of talent on this club is somewhat
> overstated.
And yet this same team plus Millen, Fryar, Vaughn, et al won just *one*
game last year, and looked very very bad in losing most of them. Adding
a rookie QB, no matter how talented, does not appreciably improve that
mixture.
In all seriousness, with a totally straight face, I think the Pats have
played much better than expected this year. They just haven't won. I
expected them to win only 3-5 games but to look much worse than they
have, especially up against the better teams in the league. Given the
choice between playing like a much-improved football team or winning
a handful of games, in a rebuilding season I will take the former every
time (not that it's impossible to have both...)
glenn
|
56.624 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:29 | 20 |
| >
> In all seriousness, with a totally straight face, I think the Pats have
> played much better than expected this year. They just haven't won. I
> expected them to win only 3-5 games but to look much worse than they
> have, especially up against the better teams in the league. Given the
> choice between playing like a much-improved football team or winning
> a handful of games, in a rebuilding season I will take the former every
> time (not that it's impossible to have both...)
I agree with Glenn.
Their defense is really starting to develop into a good unit. That's the
mark of a Parcells team -- the defense comes around first.
The offense will follow. Offenses are probably harder to get cohesive
anyways....
'Saw
|
56.625 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:38 | 12 |
| I agree with youze guys about the Pats. I tend to be more of a football fan
than a Pats fan, so I like to think that I have some objecitivty. I'd have to
say that the Pats have played OK thised year. The most marked improvement has
been on the offensive line. They are blowing out people this year, not pussy
footing around.
In comparing Bledsoe with Mirer, bear in mind that Bledsoe is playing the
equivelant of his senior year in college. Also bear in mind that he has no
real talent at the wide receiver poeition, except Brisby, who has as much to
learn as Bledsoe does.
=Bob=
|
56.626 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:57 | 13 |
|
I think that people who aren't Pats fans are confusing frustration
with negativity. It's easy to say that you'll take improvement over
victories when it's not you getting your heart broken every week. I
fully expect Parcells to take this team places and with Bledsoe at qb.
That doesn't make watching games like yesterday's any easier. You just
get the feeling that if we had had one won of all the close games that
we've been in, that this team could have built on it and won a few more
and have something really positive to take into next year. As it is all
we have is 11 losses and a rep for being a team that no one wants to play.
Small consolation if you're a fan and probably if you're a player,too.
|
56.627 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 06 1993 14:58 | 7 |
| I got ya Tommy. I understand what you're saying....
I'll bet Chip Hilton could say something to make you feel better!
'Saw
|
56.628 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:10 | 4 |
|
�I'll bet Chip Hilton could say something to make you feel better!
Nah, but Holden Caulfield could...(he'd say something like "don't be a flit")
|
56.629 | Pats to finish 5-11 | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:16 | 11 |
| Pats to run table the rest of the year. Three of last four games at
home. No tough ones until Miami last game of season. Once they win
their second game, they'll roll through the rest of the schedule, which
is as follows:
Sun. Dec. 12 Cincinnati
Sun. Dec. 19 at Cleveland
Sun. Dec. 26 Indianapolis
Sun. Jan. 2 Miami
NAZZ
|
56.630 | Just sell the damn team so they can continue rebuilding | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:27 | 25 |
| So how do people feel about next week, realistically a loss next
week will do more for this team then a win (I think). Do they
want the #1 pick, what will they do with it if they do get it. A
loss this week means they would have to win 2 more games to not
get the #1 pick, so Id say its a lock for whoever loses. You have
to feel a little better about this team then last years, even if
they end the year with just 1 win theyve been in all but what 2
games and could have easily won like 5 or 6 of there 11 loses to
date. Yes with winning the close one's come early maturatiy and
a winning attitude, which is currently missing from this team. I
hope the lose this week but then win there next 2 combined with
Cinncy winning a game so they still get the #1 pick but get the
taste of victory in there mouth's. If any of those Free Agents start
thinking about looking elsewhere they might see the end of the tunnel
and stay with the pats.
Man does it seem like the pats are constantly have ownership problems
or what. I wish orthwein would just sell the damn team to a local,
K-Corp would elimanate the Team VS Stadium Owner but a new owner
(local) may push harder for a better stadium. What are the plans for
the current stadium if K-Corp does buy the patriots ? How many more
seats and what other improvements have they promised ? thanks in
advance.
MaB
|
56.631 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 06 1993 16:06 | 10 |
| � And yet this same team plus Millen, Fryar, Vaughn, et al won just *one*
� game last year, and looked very very bad in losing most of them.
So, is it the coaching brilliance of Parcells or the fact that the
youngsters from last year have another year of experience and that the
OL is finally maturing together?
Who would you rather have at QB, Millen or Bledsoe? Fryar would have
complimented Bledsoe very well and taken the heat off of some of Brisby
et.al. Timpson looks like he's finally coming into his own.
|
56.632 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 06 1993 16:09 | 4 |
| And to further cloud the ownership position, the NFL has backed off on
their statement that New England would not move. They are now saying
that they would not force a buyer to sign anything to agree to keep the
team in New England.
|
56.633 | how many times have I got to spell it our for you? | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Dec 07 1993 11:12 | 6 |
|
Mac, when you going to get it through you head that Fryar SUCKS!!!!!!!!!????
Pats are playing possum for next year. They plan to take the Broncos route
to the playoffs (ie: Last place schedule) next year..........
mike
|
56.634 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:22 | 4 |
| Hey Mike, you're wrong about Fryar just like you are about Reeves.
Face it, Parcells made a mistake letting Irving go.
/Don
|
56.635 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:39 | 10 |
| Fryar supposedly didn't want to be in New England last year either. He
went on to post his best season as a Patriot.
Keeping Fryar wouldn't have cost the team a thing. He certainly would
have given the Pats the consistent deep threat to complement Bledsoe's
arm. He also would have been drawing the double team opening up
opportunities for other receivers. The wins he might have been able to
help put up would help put butts in the seats. He certainly wouldn't
be hurting the development of younger players (Parcells can do that all
by himself with his doghouse).
|
56.636 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:47 | 7 |
|
If Fryar had stayed he'd be in the doghouse too, so the argument is moot...
how many catches has he ad the last two weeks? A flash in the pan type
player period end of argument....
mike
|
56.637 | | MKFSA::LONG | T- 2 days and counting... | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:49 | 9 |
| >>The wins he might have been able to help put up would help put butts
>>in the seats.
Mac, correct me if I'm wrong (like I have to remind you), but haven't
the Pats sold out all but one of their home games, even without
the 'knife juggler'?
billl
|
56.638 | | MKFSA::LONG | T- 2 days and counting... | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:51 | 5 |
| I think the only way Fryar could have helped the Pats win some
of their games is if he is also a field goal kicker.
billl
|
56.639 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:55 | 10 |
| � Mac, correct me if I'm wrong (like I have to remind you), but haven't
� the Pats sold out all but one of their home games, even without
� the 'knife juggler'?
Yeah, the hiring of Parcells sent season ticket sales through the roof.
The sellouts were also partly the product of the teams they were
playing (Bills, Jets, etc.). We'll see if they can sell out Cincy and
Indy. They have been playing close enough that they will probably sell
these games out. Lots of folks will want to be there to see the Pats
finally win one.
|
56.640 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 07 1993 12:57 | 3 |
|
The early word is that the Cincy game probably *won't* be sold
out in time to be televised.
|
56.641 | But Well Never no... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:08 | 12 |
| I dont have this weeks but you can find 1 or 2 bad weeks for almost
any receiver. What did Jerry Rice do VS Dallas ? Fryar has had some
very good games this season
Week Rec Yrds TD
4 7 103 1
8 4 41 1
9 4 82 1
10 7 111 1
12 4 97 1
I think most if not all his #'s would have improved with a Healthy
Dan Marino for the season...
mab
|
56.642 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:11 | 34 |
| > help put up would help put butts in the seats. He certainly wouldn't
> be hurting the development of younger players (Parcells can do that all
> by himself with his doghouse).
First off Mac, you're as bad about this Fryar thing as ACC Chris is about
Dean.
Second off, let's examine this a little more closely. You can have
a coach like MacPherson, who's buddy-buddy with all the players, runs a
country club, and doesn't have a doghouse. Sounds like that's what you
want. Only problem was that they didn't win.
Now, you look at a team like Dallas. (I know, MikeC is gonna get on my
case about this, but it will prove a point). Jimmy Johnson comes in
and lots of players got into his doghouse, and they ended up right off
the team -- in fact, the Giants even picked up one or two. His
"team with a doghouse" went 1-15 the first year, and not much better the
next year.
But after a few years, what do you know, the guy with the cemented hairdo
put the Cowboys in the Super Bowl, beating up on that other AFC East
patsy team, the Bills.
So, it looks like a pretty clear choice to me -- go with the guy with the
doghouse...
But, hey, maybe you should have kept MacPherson and Fryar. I really do
like laughing at the laughable Patriots.....
'Saw
|
56.643 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:35 | 10 |
|
>> But after a few years, what do you know, the guy with the
>> cemented hairdo put the Cowboys in the Super Bowl, beating
>> up on that other AFC East patsy team, the Bills.
Of course, it doesn't hurt if you can sucker some team into
giving away some good talent and their draft for years to
come for some running back that doesn't fit into your plans
anyways.
|
56.644 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:39 | 9 |
| >
> Of course, it doesn't hurt if you can sucker some team into
> giving away some good talent and their draft for years to
> come for some running back that doesn't fit into your plans
> anyways.
Thank God PHilly is in the league, eh?
|
56.645 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:42 | 2 |
|
Actually, it was Minnesota.
|
56.646 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:45 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 56.645 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>
>
> Actually, it was Minnesota.
THAT'S right. I'd forgotten that.
'Saw
|
56.647 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:05 | 15 |
|
geez MaiR how convient of you to only have fryar's goos weeks available
Wk1 6 catches no td
Wk2 5 catches no td
WK5 1 catches no td
wk6 2 catches no td
wk11 3 catches no td
wk13 1 catches no td
wk14 5 catches no td
wk 3 and 7 were byes and no 100 yard games in any of these other
weeks listed. Still think he's good?????????
mike
|
56.648 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:08 | 20 |
| �Second off, let's examine this a little more closely. You can have
�a coach like MacPherson, who's buddy-buddy with all the players, runs a
�country club, and doesn't have a doghouse. Sounds like that's what you
�want. Only problem was that they didn't win.
MacPherson won more games in his first season than Parcells has. A
doghouse is fine when it's warranted. Seems like all it takes is a
twitch of the little toe to land in Parcells' doghouse. And once
you're in there is no way out because Big Bill doesn't like admitting
he made a mistake.
�Now, you look at a team like Dallas. (I know, MikeC is gonna get on my
�case about this, but it will prove a point). Jimmy Johnson comes in
�and lots of players got into his doghouse, and they ended up right off
�the team -- in fact, the Giants even picked up one or two. His
�"team with a doghouse" went 1-15 the first year, and not much better the
�next year.
And then the fruits of the one of the most lopsided trades in the
history professional sports started producing.
|
56.649 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:24 | 19 |
| > MacPherson won more games in his first season than Parcells has. A
> doghouse is fine when it's warranted. Seems like all it takes is a
> twitch of the little toe to land in Parcells' doghouse. And once
> you're in there is no way out because Big Bill doesn't like admitting
> he made a mistake.
Yeah, and then he crashed and burned in his second season.
Parcells isn't as bad as you're making him out to be. Truth be told
all the Pats funs musta figured he come in, work with all the crowd
favorites, including the Knife Juggler, and get in the playoffs first
time outta the blocks.
Well, as Dana Carvey as George Bush is fond of saying: Na gowwa happen...
Parcells will get the talent he wants, how he wants it, and build it
up how he wants it. Then he'll start winning games.....
'Saw
|
56.650 | | 7806::ASHE | While you're gnipping, he's gnopping... | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:29 | 8 |
| Oh yeah, I had a question on the end of that game Sunday.
4th and goal at the 1. 17 seconds to go. Bledsoe keeps and gets
stuffed. That play took 17 seconds? Didn't Pittsburgh have to run
another play? Or did they and NBC didn't show it? Did they just say
screw it, I don't care? You cain't just take a knee there, you'd get a
saftety and punt, right?
|
56.651 | Fryar is a Great Receiver | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:34 | 10 |
| Yes even in those bad games you listed he average about 3receptions per
game, Fryar is on a Mid 50's pace, and proberbly close to 1000yrds
receiving and this with a load of offensive talant, with byars, Kirby
Jackson and Ingram all catching the ball. Plus Marino's not there.
The pats should have held onto Fryar. How good do I think he is, I
trade Haywood Jeffries for Irvin Fryar in my FFL. Jeffries has 6TD's
to Fryar's 5 but Irvin has 3 100yrd games to Jeffries 1. And actualy
Fryar should catch about 65+ balls this year...
mab
|
56.652 | If mab trades for him thaT's good enough for me... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Dec 07 1993 14:55 | 8 |
|
I still have a hard time seeing him as great despite your ring endorsement
of trading for him. Let see Mitchell in 4 games had better stats tham Marino
had in 6 and Deberg is 2-1 with a couple of 300 yard passing games thrown
in so I have hard time figuring out how he'd have better numbers if Marino was
there.
mike
|
56.653 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:01 | 11 |
| Walt,
I was wondering the same thing. Bledsoe gets stuffed, and the
refs don't stop the clock to spot the ball. Either it is a TD
or a change of possession, so either way the clock should have
stopped.
I guess the last seconds ended up in the same place that the
final seconds from the Lakers-Piston game did.
Mike
|
56.654 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:02 | 7 |
| �Truth be told
�all the Pats funs musta figured he come in, work with all the crowd
�favorites, including the Knife Juggler, and get in the playoffs first
�time outta the blocks.
No we didn't, but we did expect more than 1-11 at this point in the
season.
|
56.655 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:25 | 22 |
| >
> No we didn't, but we did expect more than 1-11 at this point in the
> season.
I didn't.
But then again, I live through that 3-12-1 season when Parcells first
came to NY.
So, now, all the disappointed Pats fans are clinging to the memory of
Irving Fryar, much like the despondant Captain Queeg in "The Caine Mutiny"
sat there during the Courtmartial, twiddling his little steel balls, and
blubbering about knowing that there was an extra key to the food locker
and that he would have found it if only for his disloyal crew. He held
on to the hope of that key as if it were his entire sanity made manifest.
Now the Pats fans are clinging to Fryar the same way....
'Saw
|
56.656 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:37 | 11 |
| �Now the Pats fans are clinging to Fryar the same way....
Stick with the Giants and the CT wannabe New Yawkers, maybe you know
something about what they are clinging to.
Fryar is an example of Bill's darkside. His my way or the highway
attitude. It showed up in his insistence of sticking with Secules. It
showed up in his sticking with Sisson (he might be right with this
one). And we've seen very little of Pro Bowler Marv Cook in the
boxscore for no apparent reason other than speculation that he's not a
Parcells type player.
|
56.657 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:38 | 12 |
| they stole my strawberies...
Truff be told, I kinda think that the majority of Pats fans, while not pleased,
realize that even thought the team in 1-10, the future looks bright. They also
beleive that it will take some time. I know I can live with it, and I wish that
the Red Sox could wak up to the concept of rebuilding.
As to Fryar, as somebody said before, by the time thye would be contenders, he
would be too old to contribute. If you are nto going to be a contender, why not
play people who will contribute when you get there.
=Bob=
|
56.658 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:43 | 33 |
| >
> Fryar is an example of Bill's darkside. His my way or the highway
> attitude. It showed up in his insistence of sticking with Secules. It
> showed up in his sticking with Sisson (he might be right with this
> one). And we've seen very little of Pro Bowler Marv Cook in the
> boxscore for no apparent reason other than speculation that he's not a
> Parcells type player.
The hype here is all this whining about Bill's "my way or the highway".
Here's a newsflash. It's that way wherever you go, including Bob Palmers
Brave New World It's Not DEC Anymore It's Digital. (Got a few interesting
stories about that too, btw).
Bill doesn't like players who aren't willing to work, which is why he
dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before the season
started.
Pro Bowler Marv Cook maybe hasn't been getting open. Or perhaps he's
not pancaking people on his blocks. Or maybe he's been slacking in
practice. I can't say I've seen enough of them this year to be sure,
because the TE usually figures in a Parcells offense (qv Mark Bavaro).
It could be because he's not a Parcells type of player. Maybe he's not
hard-nosed enough, maybe he's not a worker. If that's the case, why
would you want him around? That was one of the mistakes MacPherson
made -- he was everybody's buddy....
Give it a year or two, then we'll see how much whining about Parcells
there is....
'Saw
|
56.659 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:44 | 9 |
| >
>they stole my strawberies...
>
Classic line from a classic movie..... One of my favorites with an
all-star cast....
'Saw
|
56.660 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:45 | 3 |
| �they stole my strawberies...
Huh?
|
56.661 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:52 | 21 |
| �I can't say I've seen enough of them this year to be sure,
Making some pretty strong statements for not seeing much of them, eh?
�because the TE usually figures in a Parcells offense (qv MarkBavaro).
The TE is heavily utilized in this Parcells' offense as well. Ben
Coates has alot of catches and several TDs.
�It could be because he's not a Parcells type of player. Maybe he's not
�hard-nosed enough, maybe he's not a worker. If that's the case, why
�would you want him around?
Gee, I don't know why anyone wouldn't want a Pro-Bowler on their team.
Besides, nothing I've read says that Cook was not a hard worker. He
made a comment in pre-season that as soon as he heard that Parcells was
going to be the coach he went out and bought a "toilet seat" (one of
them neck braces OL wear).
|
56.662 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:55 | 14 |
| |
|�they stole my strawberies...
|
| Huh?
Captain Queeg (as played by Humphrey Bogart) in 'The Caine Mutiny'.
Classic performance in a cast that included several Oscar winners (from
other movies).
hth,
'Saw
|
56.663 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:57 | 29 |
|
>> The hype here is all this whining about Bill's "my way or the highway".
>> Here's a newsflash. It's that way wherever you go...
>> Bill doesn't like players who aren't willing to work,
Unless of course you're name is Lawrence Taylor and you're a supremely
talented linebacker capable of disrupting an offense all by your lone-
some. Then you can do anything you damn well please including being the
one who originated dousing the coach with gatorade after a victory. But
if you're an unproven player like Scott Zolak, you'd better shut up and
play the good soldier.
>> which is why he dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before
>> the season started.
It's more a matter of not having talent than being lazy. Most of these
guys weren't of NFL calibre.
>> Pro Bowler Marv Cook maybe hasn't been getting open. Or perhaps he's
>> not pancaking people on his blocks. Or maybe he's been slacking in
>> practice.
Cook isn't the bruiser that Coates is. Coates is playing quite well and
is one of the real bright spots on this team. I don't fault Parcells for
this at all. My main beef was that he stuck with Secules when Secules
wasn't getting it done. That and this offense is more conservative than
Rush Limbaugh's daddy.
|
56.664 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 15:59 | 37 |
| |�I can't say I've seen enough of them this year to be sure,
|
| Making some pretty strong statements for not seeing much of them, eh?
I've caught most of their games when they haven't been playing opposite
the Giants.
My statements are no stronger than yours about Parcells.
>
> The TE is heavily utilized in this Parcells' offense as well. Ben
> Coates has alot of catches and several TDs.
Then what's the problem about Cook? Or is it just sentiment for
another one of MacPherson's buddy-players?
> Gee, I don't know why anyone wouldn't want a Pro-Bowler on their team.
If he doesn't fit in with the offense, than you can trade him.
I'm not sure if Herschel Walker ever played in the Pro Bowl for the Cowboys
(I think he did) but he wasn't getting it down, and look how the 'boys
profited when they sold him.
> Besides, nothing I've read says that Cook was not a hard worker. He
> made a comment in pre-season that as soon as he heard that Parcells was
> going to be the coach he went out and bought a "toilet seat" (one of
> them neck braces OL wear).
Maybe he wasn't producing. I don't follow the Pats closely enough to know
that.
Send ol' Marv a telegram. Tell him that Parcells gets off on work boots
and lunch pails. 8^)
|
56.665 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:10 | 31 |
| > Unless of course you're name is Lawrence Taylor and you're a supremely
> talented linebacker capable of disrupting an offense all by your lone-
> some. Then you can do anything you damn well please including being the
> one who originated dousing the coach with gatorade after a victory. But
> if you're an unproven player like Scott Zolak, you'd better shut up and
> play the good soldier.
And wouldn't the Patriots have sold their collective souls for LT during
the heyday of his career.....
Zolak couldn't carry LTs jock if he had a specially designed jock carrier
with him.
And even LT figured out along that way that if you worked at it during the
off-season, you got better.
And believe it or not, real life is that way too. Whether it's music
or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
have to work.
| >> which is why he dumped so many of MacPherson's cherished slackers before
| >> the season started.
|
| It's more a matter of not having talent than being lazy. Most of these
| guys weren't of NFL calibre.
Well, that's what I've thought all along, but what just getting testy. 8^)
'Saw
|
56.666 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:24 | 20 |
| �I've caught most of their games when they haven't been playing opposite
�the Giants.
OOOO, what's that, 2?
�My statements are no stronger than yours about Parcells.
Yabbut, I've been watching him coach all year. Sorry if I didn't get
sucked into the "Parcells is God and is the saviour the Pats have been
looking for since Billy Sullivan got a team in Boston".
�Then what's the problem about Cook?
Doesn't it make you wonder when the guy who recently led the NFL in
receptions for the TE has only a handful of catches?
�I don't follow the Pats closely enough to know
�that.
Gee, really?
|
56.667 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:29 | 34 |
| |�I've caught most of their games when they haven't been playing opposite
|�the Giants.
|
| OOOO, what's that, 2?
Nah, probably 4 or 5, not counting the game I went to against Detriot(tm).
|�Then what's the problem about Cook?
|
| Doesn't it make you wonder when the guy who recently led the NFL in
| receptions for the TE has only a handful of catches?
Actually, I think Tommy gave the answer pretty good. It would seem that
Ben Coates is doing a better job.
|�I don't follow the Pats closely enough to know
|�that.
|
| Gee, really?
I mean that I don't read up on their stats in the paper the way I would
the Giants.
I've seen enough of the Pats this season to know that they are not
playing badly. They've made mistakes (last game) and had some bad breaks
(fumble in Jets game), but they've been close a lot, and are better than
their record indicates.
Clearly you didn't expect to make the playoffs this year, and the 5th
place schedule will help tremendously next year as the team starts to
come together more. So this year ain't so bad afterall....
|
56.668 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:29 | 7 |
| Gee, yer right, Mac. The Pats sip this year, they never should have canned
Coach Mac.
And the Red Sox are heading in the right direction, ol' Lou Gorman is the
most brilliant mind in baseball.
Hey, was Amy Fischer an innocent victim too, Mac?
|
56.669 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:34 | 18 |
| �Actually, I think Tommy gave the answer pretty good. It would seem that
�Ben Coates is doing a better job.
No, Ben Coates number is getting called more often and noone seems to
have an answer as to why.
I'm not slamming Coates here. In fact I wonder why Coates wasn't used
more under the old regime. I'm just wondering how a guy goes from Pro
Bowl to relative obscurity over the course of the offseason. There's
enough TE work to spread around. Interestingly enough, Cook is the
starter. Coates is getting the glory.
�Clearly you didn't expect to make the playoffs this year, and the 5th
�place schedule will help tremendously next year as the team starts to
�come together more.
They are playing a 5th place schedule this year. That's what makes the
1-11 record hard to swallow.
|
56.670 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:36 | 10 |
|
Actually it's better the past have a lousy record...
There's nothing like finishing last, getting the last place schedule, having a
.500 season and convincing people that the team is on the rise only to have
them get crushed next year when they play a tougher schedule...
It sets back the rebuilding effort and the fans enthusiasm.....
Metz
|
56.671 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:37 | 15 |
|
>> Zolak couldn't carry LTs jock if he had a specially designed jock carrier
>> with him.
No doubt about it. That's not even close to the point, though. You're
telling us that Bill likes good soldiers but LT, aka the Coke Machine,
was anything but. I guess being the best player on the planet covers for
a multitude of sins, eh? He should have given Zolak a shot.
>> And believe it or not, real life is that way too. Whether it's music
>> or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
>> have to work.
Gee, really, Ward?
'Saw
|
56.672 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:45 | 3 |
| And in the ongoing saga of Patriot Ownership, it was reported today
that the St.Louis group that lost their bid for an expansion team has
contacted the firm handling the sale of the Patriots.
|
56.673 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:50 | 34 |
| Re Cook/Coates.
Well, I can't give you an answer. It would appear that Coates
is getting the job done. Perhaps Bledsoe doesn't throw to
Cook.
> No doubt about it. That's not even close to the point, though. You're
> telling us that Bill likes good soldiers but LT, aka the Coke Machine,
> was anything but. I guess being the best player on the planet covers for
> a multitude of sins, eh? He should have given Zolak a shot.
Sure does. Like I said, it's not a perfect world. LT overcame the Coke
deal, got his life back on track, and I'll take my hat off to him for
that. He's given me some of the best football entertainment ever.
And it's not like LT just turned it on on game day. He'd laze off in
camp, but by the time game day rolled around, he was, in his own words,
a crazed dog.
And yeah, I guess if you're the best player on the planet you get a
lot of slack.
| >> And believe it or not, real life is that way too. Whether it's music
| >> or software or football, there's always some who are naturals and don't
| >> have to work.
|
| Gee, really, Ward?
You slay me, Tommy. You really do......8^)
|
56.674 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:50 | 11 |
| Gee 'Saw, remember when the Patriots beat the Oilers in
Macpherson's first year? Remember how you were saying all kinds of nice
things about the coach and the team? One bad year and suddenly coach
Macpherson is the football equivalent of Beavis & Butthead? Now while I'm
glad the Pats got Parcells let's not forget who was the architect of those
Giants' Superbowl teams, George Young, and the pretty good job the current New
York coach is doing. Parcells is capable of making mistakes and I think he
made one with Fryar. And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's
the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.
/Don
|
56.675 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:56 | 4 |
| �Perhaps Bledsoe doesn't throw to
� Cook.
Another blinding revelation by the 'Sawman.
|
56.676 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:00 | 41 |
| > Gee 'Saw, remember when the Patriots beat the Oilers in
>Macpherson's first year? Remember how you were saying all kinds of nice
>things about the coach and the team?
yeah, well that was a helluva win -- very exciting and everything.
>One bad year and suddenly coach
>Macpherson is the football equivalent of Beavis & Butthead?
Hey, Beavis and Butt-head are cool. And Macpherson ain't a bad guy.
He's better than Handley was.
>Now while I'm
>glad the Pats got Parcells let's not forget who was the architect of those
>Giants' Superbowl teams, George Young, and the pretty good job the current New
>York coach is doing. Parcells is capable of making mistakes and I think he
>made one with Fryar. And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's
>the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.
George Young AND Parcells. Left to his own devices, George Young wouldn't
be able to leave his bedroom and would be a Dick Gregory case. He'd do
about as well in the draft too. George Young is the one who chose Ray
Handley, and the one who chose Dan Reeves only after he was rebuffed on
his first two choices. George Young is the guy who was vilified by the
New York press (and rightly so) because he wouldn't even give Parcells
a chance to refuse coming back to New York when he became available
during the coaching search. I'm not a big George Young fan by any
stretch of the imagination.
Fryar still would not have made the difference for the Pats. Hell,
he didn't make the difference even whey they had talent and they were
getting spanked all over the field by the Bears........
'Saw
|
56.677 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:03 | 29 |
| |�Perhaps Bledsoe doesn't throw to
|� Cook.
|
| Another blinding revelation by the 'Sawman.
As in, it's not the coaches fault.
On the other hand, he is hitting Coates when Coates is in, so one might
assume that:
a) Coates is a bigger target
b) Coates is open, Cook isn't
c) Maybe Cook wouldn't give Bledsoe a reach-around in the
shower, so Bledsoe doesn't like him any more.
d) Bledsoe's inexperience.
We used to have a problem with Hostetler only seeing half the field and
then running. It might be something similar with Bledsoe.
Who knows.
But if Coates is getting the job done, what's the problem?
'Saw
|
56.678 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:06 | 18 |
|
> And for all you stat geeks chew on this one, 9-3, it's
> the Miami record and the only statistic that Irving Fryar cares about.
Sure, now that he's hit 30, found God and grown up. When the Pats
were winning, the contract holdouts and off-field problems didn't seem
to conflict at all with this great winning attitude in Fryar's mind.
I don't understand this hang-up with Fryar. In essence, the Pats did
him a huge favor. Fryar fans should be happy. Fryar is now in the
situation that he repeatedly stated that he wanted to be in: playing
for someone else. Let's face it; Fryar did not want to be Drew
Bledsoe's tutor. In all seriousness, I don't begrudge him any success
he may enjoy with the Dolphins. It'd be nice to see him do something
memorable in the playoffs, and considering the difference in the team's
situations it shouldn't make a bit of difference to Pats' fans...
glenn
|
56.679 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:06 | 8 |
| �Fryar still would not have made the difference for the Pats. Hell,
�he didn't make the difference even whey they had talent and they were
�getting spanked all over the field by the Bears........
You got us there, 'Saw. Irving shoulda been a main and come in at free
safety to stop the Fridge from powering the ball into the endzone. He
also coulda done a bit better pass blocking before he went out on his
route.
|
56.680 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:10 | 21 |
| �As in, it's not the coaches fault.
Who's calling the plays? Certainly not the rookie QB who left school a
year early.
�On the other hand, he is hitting Coates when Coates is in, so one might
�assume that:
�
� a) Coates is a bigger target
� b) Coates is open, Cook isn't
� c) Maybe Cook wouldn't give Bledsoe a reach-around in the
� shower, so Bledsoe doesn't like him any more.
� d) Bledsoe's inexperience.
You forgot one:
e) the coach isn't calling a pass to the TE when Cook is in the
game
�But if Coates is getting the job done, what's the problem?
The Pats are 1-11. The coach isn't using all of his weapons.
|
56.681 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Tue Dec 07 1993 17:25 | 7 |
| Hey 'Saw is this the same New Yawk press that villified Young when
he made Phil Simms a first round draft choice? No doubt about it,
George doesn't have a clue. The Midgets would probably have a trophy
case full of Lombardi hardware if they had Scott Brunner at quarterback
instead Simms!
/Don
|
56.682 | George Young has Altzhimers | CNTROL::CHILDS | J. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!! | Wed Dec 08 1993 08:53 | 17 |
| >
> Hey 'Saw is this the same New Yawk press that villified Young when
> he made Phil Simms a first round draft choice? No doubt about it,
> George doesn't have a clue. The Midgets would probably have a trophy
> case full of Lombardi hardware if they had Scott Brunner at quarterback
> instead Simms!
they did win one with Hoss so I guess it's possible.....
Cmon Mac put the pieces together. Parcells, conservative offense, run oriented,
two back one TE offense and the main reason you don't see Cook is cause he
can't block. He said it so himself when he order a toliet seat. IF you can't
block you can't play for Bill get use to it. His way or the highway babee...
mike
|
56.683 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 09:07 | 17 |
| >
> they did win one with Hoss so I guess it's possible.....
>
Yeah, but Simms did most of the work getting them there.....
As to Coates and Cook, I'm betting that Coates is getting open, Cook
isn't....
And as to Fryar stopping the fridge and pass blocking and stuff, you
just proved my point. Stop whining about Fryar cause he wouldn't
have made a difference.....
'Saw
|
56.684 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:19 | 11 |
|
>> As to Coates and Cook, I'm betting that Coates is getting open, Cook
>> isn't....
Saw, you seem to be doing an awful lot of *guessing*. You might try
actually watching and *then* evaluating instead of automatically
coming to Bill's defense. It ain't a matter of who is or isn't getting
open. If that were it then Cook would be the main man because he's the
much better receiver. Plain and simple, Coates is Parcells' type of
bruising TE, Cook isn't.
|
56.685 | I like Bill | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:43 | 25 |
| Geez,
All this grousing about Parcells and his coaching thisa year.
Didn't we all say it's a long term project? Look at the talent he
has (has not). This year is gut check, experimentation time.
The defense is jelling quite nicely. Parcells' plan is in place.
Patience (cuz we'll all be singing "Meet me in St Louis").
IMO, MacPherson was a stopgap. I liked him but didn't think he
had what it took to build a powerhouse. His biggest problem
was Sam the Sham.
Parcells has the history and gonfalons to back him up. Dat's why
all Jints fans adore him. Why he's the savior of that franchise.
I was A jint fan when I was a lad and they had to be the most
lovable underachieving franchise in pro football. In the 50's
and early 60's they were consistently the best team in football
and came up with a goose egg (I think). Can you sau Colts, Packers,
Packers, and Bears?? And that pained me cuz I loved thewm Jints.
Parcells brought back Giant pride and bagged them a coupla
champeenships. I say keep at it Bill. Yea he's made mistakes, but
did anyone seriously think this franchise was going to the Emerald
City sometime soon?
MikeL
|
56.686 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:46 | 56 |
| > Saw, you seem to be doing an awful lot of *guessing*. You might try
> actually watching and *then* evaluating instead of automatically
> coming to Bill's defense. It ain't a matter of who is or isn't getting
> open. If that were it then Cook would be the main man because he's the
> much better receiver. Plain and simple, Coates is Parcells' type of
> bruising TE, Cook isn't.
Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
doing.
So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
better than guess.
All I'm saying is that you guys are just as guilty of what you're accusing
me of, just on the other side.
I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
you're all over me telling me I'm guessing. Yet you all profess to know
that Parcells is not calling passes to the TE when Cook is in there.
That's pretty bogus. On any pass play there are a number of things happening
all at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about a pass
(other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
receiver ONLY, except in rare cases. There's always a primary, secondary
and a safety valve.
So, I think it's kind of ludicrous that Parcells a) has a pass to just
the TE in the playbook and b) he's purposely not calling it when
Cook is in there, becuase, no matter what the effect on the team, he's
out to screw poor Pro Bowl TE Marv Cook, because Cook isn't his kind
of guy.
Of course I'm guessing. There are so many variables involved, from something
as simple as Bledsoe SEEING Coates better than he sees Cook, to maybe
Coates getting open better than Cook....
If I KNEW for sure what it was, do you think I'd be sitting here, writing
this? Hell no, I'd be making better money coaching some place, as would
the rest of the "experts" in here....
I'll defend Parcells because I've seen what he can do to turn a team
around and produce a champion. If you guys wanna hang on to the
halcyon days of Coach Macpherson and how wonderful things would have
been with Marv "Pro Bowl" Cook and Irving "The Second Coming" Fryar,
hey, go for it......
'Saw
PS And I still don't care if Cook was in the Pro Bowl. If you have
a guy who's doing the job and possibly doing it better, then what's
the big whoop?
|
56.687 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:49 | 13 |
| > Patience (cuz we'll all be singing "Meet me in St Louis").
Did anyone see the promos for the Eddie Andelman show on SPORTS Channel?
He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
legislators lined up in various punt formations".
I was rolling.......
'Saw
|
56.688 | If'n ya cain't laugh at CT who cain ya laugh at? ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:52 | 8 |
|
> He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
> legislators lined up in various punt formations".
After all, they're *your* elected officials, 'Saw... ;-)
glenn
|
56.689 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:05 | 15 |
| |> He was talking about a "trained weasel show" as "Fran Murray gets
|> legislators lined up in various punt formations".
|
| After all, they're *your* elected officials, 'Saw... ;-)
Oh, I know, that's what made it so priceless.
The trained weasels, headed up by that fat pantload Lowell "I love
fried SPAM every morning" Weicker, and his butt ugly (and I mean
scare the buzzards of a dung wagon ugly) sidekick, Eunice "Living proof
that someone was poking the buffalo" Groark.....
'Saw
|
56.690 | Ray Perkins should be getting more flak | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:11 | 15 |
| Don't forget that Fryar wasn't released, or left unprotected as a free
agent. He was traded to Miami for a #2 pick in 1993 (who turned into
OL Todd Rucci, a starter until he got injured) and a 1994 3rd round
choice.
I believe Parcells is developing a team for the long term, not a quick
fix. When this team is ready to challenge for a Super Bowl, Fryar may
be too old to contribute. (Heck, his kids could be too old to
contribute the next time the Pats challenge for the Super Bowl!) My
only problem so far with Parcells, besides some questionable play
selection, is his offensive coordinator. Ray Perkins is a boring loser
who wouldn't know innovation if it bit him in the arse. IMO, he is the
main culprit behind the Pats underachieving offense.
NAZZ
|
56.691 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:17 | 40 |
|
>> Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
>> You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
>> doing.
What does that have to do with whether Coates is more of a Parcells
type TE than Cook is? If you watch on tv you can easily see that
they are both good receivers but Coates is a better blocker.
>> So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
>> better than guess.
Only if you don't know what you're looking at.
>> I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
>> you're all over me telling me I'm guessing.
Aren't you flat out saying right there that you're guessing?
>> Yet you all profess to know that Parcells is not calling passes to the
>> TE when Cook is in there.
I never said that. In fact, I don't think anyone did. What I'm saying is
that he isn't even playing Cook very much. The guy can catch. He's got a
Pro Bowl appearance to prove it. He also led the team in recptions once
upon a time. Unless, he's all of a suuden forgotten what enabled him to
do those two things, I don't think his receiving ability is the problem.
>> That's pretty bogus. On any pass play there are a number of things
>> happeningall at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about
>> a pass other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
>> receiver ONLY, except in rare cases.
Never heard of a quick slant, a swing pass, a screen pass. etc.?
>> Of course I'm guessing.
There's that word again.
|
56.692 | Yeh, I was an old Giants diehard too | AKOCOA::BREEN | Waite Hoyt and Tom Umphlett | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:22 | 18 |
| Mike you forgot 1956 when Giants came out in title game in sneakers and
beat dem bears 56-10. The Sneakers were worn in another one of the big
games of that era when snow was deeper and whiter and women were
prettier and miles were longer....
But I was big charlyconnerlyrotegiffordwebsterlittlemorobustellihuff
and many others fan including the roosevelts and to borrow a phrase
from Walt, A Chris Schenkel fan, there I said it.
But somehow those promoting the game understood the concept of drama
and the whole affair was presented somewhat similar to WWF today as
opposed to the Gowdy-Sean McDonough-ugh school of boredom
The they threw the old gang out in 64-65 and at one time had Joe
Morrison on waivers which was it for me (I didn't know it was probably
a procedure thing)
And don't forget Yelverton A. Tittle
|
56.693 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:25 | 67 |
| | >> Even when you watch it on TV, you don't seen the entire picture.
| >> You have to be there yourself to see what all of the receivers are
| >> doing.
|
| What does that have to do with whether Coates is more of a Parcells
| type TE than Cook is? If you watch on tv you can easily see that
| they are both good receivers but Coates is a better blocker.
Nothing. I was responding to the flak about me making an educated guess
as to what it going on.
| >> So, even if I watched every Pats game faithfully, I could still do no
| >> better than guess.
|
| Only if you don't know what you're looking at.
You rarely see the entire play develop and are at the mercy of what
camera shots you are shown -- as opposed to being in the stadium.
| >> I say, "I have to guess that Coates is getting open and Cook isn't" and
| >> you're all over me telling me I'm guessing.
|
| Aren't you flat out saying right there that you're guessing?
Use my statement in context.
But of course I have to make an educated guess. Just as any of you guys
do.
> I never said that. In fact, I don't think anyone did. What I'm saying is
> that he isn't even playing Cook very much. The guy can catch. He's got a
> Pro Bowl appearance to prove it. He also led the team in recptions once
> upon a time. Unless, he's all of a suuden forgotten what enabled him to
> do those two things, I don't think his receiving ability is the problem.
Read the replies. You never said it, but it was said.
| >> That's pretty bogus. On any pass play there are a number of things
| >> happeningall at once, and I've never EVER heard a coach or QB talk about
| >> a pass other than a screen) that is designed to go to one receiver and one
| >> receiver ONLY, except in rare cases.
|
| Never heard of a quick slant, a swing pass, a screen pass. etc.?
Sure. Note the use of "except in rare cases" and "other than a screen".
| >> Of course I'm guessing.
|
| There's that word again.
Right. And so are ALL the rest of you.
Fact is, not one of us KNOWS why Coates is getting more PT than Cook,
or why he is chalking up more receptions.
If we did we wouldn't be here having this discussion, we'd be on the Pats
staff, or some other closely related job.
So we're all guessing, or speculating, or whatever you wanna call it....
'Saw
|
56.694 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:27 | 13 |
| MikeC, Cook is the starting TE so he's given plenty of opportunity to
block since his number isn't being called for pass routes.
�Stop whining about Fryar cause he wouldn't
�have made a difference.....
I ain't whining and he could have made a difference. The Pats don't
have a consistent deep threat to go along with Bledsoe's arm. They
have some potential up and comers, but Fryar would have helped. Even
Don Criqui can see that.
'Saw, would you have been so pumped up about Parcells if Norwood didn't
miss that FG?
|
56.695 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:28 | 17 |
| >
> But somehow those promoting the game understood the concept of drama
> and the whole affair was presented somewhat similar to WWF today as
> opposed to the Gowdy-Sean McDonough-ugh school of boredom
>
It was new, and not widely accepted as it is today. In those days, there
was a great disparity between what the offense was paid and the defense
was paid. The Giants were one of the first teams to have a really
identifiable defense, from what I understand.
Sean McDonough is quite informative and enjoys a very good reputation
with others in his field. They all speak highly of him....
'Saw
|
56.696 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:30 | 12 |
| � Never used the words "demolish" "Maul" er anything like that, just said
� they'd kick the Patsies into the river, what, with the lousy calls, and
� the down to the lasted second thang, is about what happened.
� JaKe
Jake, losing a game by 3 points after a failed 4th and inches QB sneak
ain't close to being kicked into the river. Heck they barely got their
toes wet. As to lousy calls they only ones I saw were in the Steelers'
favor. The Pats stuffed the Steelers O and Woodson was being toasted
(OK, he made 2 decent plays, but the Pats certainly weren't worried
about going to his man).
|
56.697 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:30 | 13 |
| > 'Saw, would you have been so pumped up about Parcells if Norwood didn't
> miss that FG?
Without a doubt.
But, bottom line, Norwood did miss the FG, and the Giants won. Or does
that somehow diminish the victory?
'Saw
|
56.698 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:32 | 4 |
| �But, bottom line, Norwood did miss the FG, and the Giants won. Or does
�that somehow diminish the victory?
It certainly does diminish your slams of the Bills.
|
56.699 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:39 | 27 |
| >
> It certainly does diminish your slams of the Bills.
>
Why?
The Bills lost. They lost because one of their players didn't get it
done when it counted. Just like the Giants might have lost if the
tackle had made three yards closer to the goal line, instead of where
it was.
If you win a rugby match because the other teams kicker doesn't get it
through the uprights on a last minute penalty kick or drop goal, does
it diminish your victory? I don't think so.
The Bills played a good game that day, and came close to winning. I've
never said they didn't. Parcells himself said "If we played again tomorrow,
they'd probably win 20-19." He'd just participated in one of the most
exciting Super Bowls ever.
However, the Bills stunk up the joint the next two years, and played
very poorly.... If they had mounted anything like their effort against
the Giants, the outcomes of one of those two games might have been a little
less lopsided.
'Saw
|
56.700 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:41 | 17 |
| � IMO, MacPherson was a stopgap. His biggest problem
� was Sam the Sham.
Exactly. People around here love to slam Mac and Berry and immediately
jumped on the Parcells bandwagon. It's been a long time since a
Patriot head coach was given the kind of control Parcells has. We
never really had a chance to see what the other guys could do running
their own system. Berry also had the unfortunate timing of having to
deal with the juggernaut called the 1985-86 Bears.
� Parcells has the history and gonfalons to back him up. Dat's why
� all Jints fans adore him. Why he's the savior of that franchise.
More than adoration. We're talking borderline Dean Smith worship here.
Parcells being the one at the head coach spot for the Giants first
Super Bowl victory had a lot to do with it, especially since it came on
the heels of decades of mediocrity.
|
56.701 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:51 | 10 |
| �But of course I have to make an educated guess. Just as any of you guys
�do.
Your educated guess is based on watching 4 or 5 games. The Pats fans'
educated guesses are based on watching 12 games and Parcells reputation
for being stubborn and picking favorites.
�Read the replies. You never said it, but it was said.
Read 'em again, 'Saw. Tommy did a great job of summing them up.
|
56.702 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:52 | 32 |
| |� Parcells has the history and gonfalons to back him up. Dat's why
|� all Jints fans adore him. Why he's the savior of that franchise.
|
| More than adoration. We're talking borderline Dean Smith worship here.
| Parcells being the one at the head coach spot for the Giants first
| Super Bowl victory had a lot to do with it, especially since it came on
| the heels of decades of mediocrity.
No worse than everyone revering Macpherson and Berry.
The Litany of Terrible Giants coaches begins just after Allie Sherman,
with (I believe) Alex Webster. I mean, we went through some winners, let
me tell ya.
Perkins gave a glimmer of hope (I believe they made the playoffs one
year under him - 1981 I think) but then nothing, and he was gone.
We got Parcells. He ran a tight ship, was hard-nosed, and got the Giants
something they hadn't had in 30 years.
However, you're wrong on the Dean Smith part. No Dean Smif' fan ever
questions the system. But ask Mike Childs -- even when the Giants were
winning we questioned a lot of thing.
We just weren't wanting to toss him away because the first season the
Giants went 3-12-1, and we weren't saying "Oh, if they'd have kept so-and-so
we'd have been 9-7 and in the playoffs....."
'Saw
|
56.703 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:56 | 19 |
| �No worse than everyone revering Macpherson and Berry.
Who the hell is revering MacPherson & Berry? The closest I've seen
anyone come to reverance was when I said they weren't as bad as
everyone likes to remember them.
�However, you're wrong on the Dean Smith part. No Dean Smif' fan ever
�questions the system. But ask Mike Childs -- even when the Giants were
�winning we questioned a lot of thing.
I know Mike Childs questioned Parcells. I don't think "we" did.
Especially now since someone won't allow Parcells to be question now
that he is coaching the Pats.
�We just weren't wanting to toss him away because the first season the
�Giants went 3-12-1, and we weren't saying "Oh, if they'd have kept so-and-so
�we'd have been 9-7 and in the playoffs....."
Please show me where anyone has said that.
|
56.704 | You guys win. The TRUE Patriot Experts.... | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:57 | 35 |
| |�But of course I have to make an educated guess. Just as any of you guys
|�do.
|
| Your educated guess is based on watching 4 or 5 games. The Pats fans'
| educated guesses are based on watching 12 games and Parcells reputation
| for being stubborn and picking favorites.
Okay, so you guys win. You guys KNOW based on seeing all those games
on the TV set. Cool. You are far more astute than I am.
Happy now?
> Read 'em again, 'Saw. Tommy did a great job of summing them up.
Okay, fine. Parcells is doing a terrible job coaching the Pats and they'll
never get anywhere. They should trade him to Miami to get Fryar back, and
while they're at it they should get rid of that guy Coates, so that
Mr. Pro Bowl himself Marv Cook can save the day. And maybe they can
get John Hannah out of retirement too....
And let's clean house of all the Parcells favorites, and get back some
of Macpherson's Country Club members. They were great, and would have gotten
to the Super Bowl someday -- if all the other teams had died in plane crashes
maybe....
Yep, Parcells SUCKS, and it was the worst decision the Patriots ever could
have made......
'Saw
|
56.705 | This is pointless... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:57 | 0 |
56.706 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:58 | 12 |
| >
> I know Mike Childs questioned Parcells. I don't think "we" did.
> Especially now since someone won't allow Parcells to be question now
> that he is coaching the Pats.
>
We as in Giants fans. I questioned him, every Giants fan in Giants
questioned him.
I'm not disallowing anyone anything. Do what you like......
|
56.707 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:58 | 6 |
| > <<< Note 56.705 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
> -< This is pointless... >-
No shit.
|
56.708 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 11:59 | 3 |
| � -< This is pointless... >-
This is SPORTS...
|
56.709 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 08 1993 12:07 | 4 |
|
It beats the hell out of that hygene discussion. It even beats the hell
out of that discussion on whether or not baseball players were athletes
which was even more pointless but Glenn was eating it up with a spoon.
|
56.710 | I just see these criticisms as very weak; I'm sorry... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 08 1993 13:15 | 43 |
|
> It beats the hell out of that hygene discussion. It even beats the hell
> out of that discussion on whether or not baseball players were athletes
> which was even more pointless but Glenn was eating it up with a spoon.
I'm not trying to discourage it. I'm just saying that we're not
hearing any very substantive arguments that Parcells is failing in
the job he was hired to do. We might in the future, but we're not
now. Okay, Parcells is stubborn and evasive. So what else is new?
Okay, so Parcells didn't go along with everyone's expert opinion
that an emotional, unprepared kid like Scott Zolak should be rewarded
for these shortcomings just the same with a couple of starts when
Bledsoe went down (Parcells has said as much in his intentionally
indirect way), and that might have cost the Pats a win and it
undoubtedly cost the paying customer some entertainment value.
Okay, Parcells hasn't cut Scott Sisson in mid-season (on this point
Mac is grudgingly conceding that Parcells' patience and compassion
*might* be a smart move). Okay, so Marv Cook isn't catching many
balls as Parcells isn't enamored of sacrificing the (previously
non-existent) running game in favor of some low-impact TE play. None
of this registers even a momentary flutter on my aggravation meter.
Then we have the plus ledger (which also has not yielded dividends;
not yet): the Pats have gone from one of the most penalized teams
in the NFL under MacPherson to the least penalized in the AFC under
Parcells in one year. Is this the overall "system" at work, or is it
coaching? Were all those guys out of formation and jumping offsides
and generally unaware of what they were supposed to be doing really
the result of MacPherson's lack of control over the front office?
Another one: Parcells is letting the team's future, Drew Bledsoe,
learn on the job, right out of the chute. Many felt that Parcells
would never allow a rookie QB to start. Just another decision that is
looking to the future as opposed to preserving someone's Pro Bowl past.
Did the Pats really get a #2 and a #3 pick for Fryar? I thought it was
a #7, but maybe I'm getting this confused with the Vaughn or Stephens
deals. If that's the case, I count it as another plus. It's the
equivalent of the Red Sox trading a Mike Greenwell for a couple of
promising young prospects; in other words an excellent idea considering
the team's current situation.
glenn
|
56.711 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Wed Dec 08 1993 13:15 | 2 |
| Does it have a motor ? Have a Motor ?
|
56.712 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 08 1993 13:26 | 29 |
|
>> I'm just saying that we're not hearing any very substantive
>> arguments that Parcells is failing in the job he was hired
>> to do.
I don't think that's the point. At least it isn't mine.
>> Okay, so Parcells didn't go along with everyone's expert opinion
>> that an emotional, unprepared kid like Scott Zolak should be rewarded
>> for these shortcomings just the same with a couple of starts when
>> Bledsoe went down (Parcells has said as much in his intentionally
>> indirect way), and that might have cost the Pats a win and it
>> undoubtedly cost the paying customer some entertainment value.
This is the only thing that I disagree with. I can see not benching
Bledsoe when he's going bad (and he is) because he's your "future"
but Secules isn't. He's supposed to come in and do the job when the
starter goes down and he didn't. He failed miserably. We stood to
lose nothing by playing Zolak. If Bledsoe goes down for any length
of time I have no faith whatsoever in Secules' ability to carry the
load. And why would I?
>> Did the Pats really get a #2 and a #3 pick for Fryar? I thought it was
>> a #7, but maybe I'm getting this confused with the Vaughn or Stephens
>> deals.
They got a seven from Seattle for Vaughn. I thought that they just got a
three from Miami but I could be wrong.
|
56.713 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Wed Dec 08 1993 13:42 | 12 |
| Mac, where were you the past oh, 5-6 years? Dick McPhearson was a very popular
guy around here. The media especially loved him, because he would talk
tirelessly with them, all the while selling, selling, selling the team. As
several people have said, his biggest problem was Sam Jankovitch and Victor
Kiam. For his first couple of years Raymond Berry was even praised by the
fans. It was only in his last year or so that everyone got the idea that
he was totally clueless.
Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their hsitory, are
going in the right direction.
=Bob=
|
56.714 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Dec 08 1993 14:55 | 12 |
|
>>Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their hsitory, are
>>going in the right direction.
>>=Bob=
You're probably right in more ways than one Bobby... Parcells &Co
build a winner.... about 1200 miles west.
MikeL
|
56.715 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:26 | 6 |
| �Mac, where were you the past oh, 5-6 years?
I've been around. Where have you been?
Take a look in the Patriots notesfile and 'Saw's recent comments and
you'll get an idea of what I'm talking about.
|
56.716 | Just stay in NE....Thats enough to ask for this year | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:28 | 20 |
| I never said the Pats were dumb in trading Fryar, just they could have
used his skills this year. If Rucci comes back next year, starts and
produces plus we get a decent pick with the 4rth rounder this will help
the rebuild more then just fryar. I was arguing that Fryar is a great
WR and why would fryar's # be better with Marino, because he's a better
QB regardless of what Mitchall or OldMan are doing.
Next Coates, the only thing I question is why didnt they put cook on
the trading block. Coates has 39 receptions for 455 yrds and 5 TD's.
Cook last year was 52rec, 413yrds and 2 TD's. If you figure Coates
stats out for the season its 52rec for 607yrds and 7TD's !!!! Coates
is a keeper but they should have tried to trade Cook for Draft picks
when his stock was up !!!
So the pats have an extra 3rd round pick from Miami, I think there's
a note in the pats file with what other extra picks they currently
hold (I dont remember them off the top of my head but think they have
some others).
MaB
|
56.717 | Draft pick this year is in 3rd round | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:34 | 7 |
| From page 179 in the 1993 Pats Media guide, in the draft section
for 1993:
51. Todd Rucci OL, Penn. State (from Miami, along with a 1994 draft
pick, in exchange for WR Irving Fryar.)
NAZZ
|
56.718 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:35 | 6 |
| If you believe the local papers, Cook was on the trading block.
Not sure if the reason a deal wasn't made was a matter of not
getting any offers, or not liking the offers the Pats got for him.
Mike
|
56.719 | Trading deadline in NFL comes way too early | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:50 | 10 |
| It's really tough to make a deal during the season in the NFL, for
a couple of reasons. One of course is the basic conservatism that
runs throughout the league. The other is the trading deadline occurs
between (I think) the 6th and 7th weeks of the season. The other
major sports all have their trading deadlines much later, which gives
you a better perspective on what you need to win and who or what you
may be willing to deal to obtain what you need. It would also let you
react better to filling holes from injury.
NAZZ
|
56.720 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:53 | 11 |
| Mac
I don't have time to read old notes files, but my memory is clear that Coach
Mac was given every benefit of the doubt, every break imaginable in New England.
The comments by 'Saw mostly pertain to the change in atmosphere around the team,
reflectign each coach's methods. Additionally, these comments are beign made
three quarters of a season after Coach Mac is gone. I don't recall 'Saw saying
much about Coach Mac when he was here, as I doubt he particularly cared about
the Pats one way or the other.
=Bob=
|
56.721 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 08 1993 15:58 | 9 |
| >much about Coach Mac when he was here, as I doubt he particularly cared about
>the Pats one way or the other.
And I still don't.
8^)
'Saw
|
56.722 | Ahh, why not... | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Dec 08 1993 16:34 | 10 |
|
>> Once again, the Patriots, possibly for the first time in their
>> hsitory, are going in the right direction.
With regards to this year, what direction choices are there?
|
56.723 | A great receiver should be irreguardless of QB... | 38728::CHILDS | J. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!! | Thu Dec 09 1993 08:55 | 4 |
|
I gotta admit Mair your logic never ceases to amaze me....
mike
|
56.724 | Ive seen some of the examples of logic in this notes file | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 09 1993 10:16 | 17 |
| How can you say a WR should can be great regardless of the QB ?
Fryar is having a good/great year with Mia, are any of the NE
WR doing anywhere near what fryar is doing, I dont have a stat
list but with all the QB problems in Mia and all the offensive
weapons they have where does Fryar fall in the AFC Rankings for
WR's ? Does anybody have a list for such things. Also how many
WR's in the AFC have more TD's then Fryar ? Look at some of the
shmucks Fryar had to put up with at QB, Eason, The Short Guy from
Chicago :-), and then pick any of the last 3 season's QB, none are
real NFL quality QB's and Fryar still managed to post decent #'s.
Give him a real top notch QB (and a coach/team like in miami) and
his #'s will go up. He will prove over the next 2 season how good
he is/was, too bad with marino out this year Miami proberbly wont
make it to the big dance.... But Fryar has a legitamate shot at a SB
win over the next 2.5 season, not necesarily true with the pats.
Mab
|
56.725 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | J. Elders, you got it RIGHT Babeee!! | Thu Dec 09 1993 11:11 | 8 |
|
which side of the argument are you on this time Mair? Sure looks like the last
reply was stating that Fryar doesn't need a great QB. Truth of the matter is
that when you suck as bad as Fryar does it doesn't matter who the QB is....
mike
|
56.726 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Thu Dec 09 1993 12:10 | 5 |
| Hey Childs, if the Midgets had a receiver as talented and team
oriented as IRVING FRYAR during their heyday they probably would have a
couple of more Lombardi Trophies in the Mara trophy case.
/Don
|
56.727 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 09 1993 12:19 | 5 |
| � Hey Childs, if the Midgets had a receiver as talented and team
� oriented as IRVING FRYAR during their heyday they probably would have a
� couple of more Lombardi Trophies in the Mara trophy case.
Nah, they still woulda had Phil Simms (trying) to throw to him.
|
56.728 | Anybody think Pat's are tackling better this year? | AKOCOA::BREEN | Bill Monboquette | Thu Dec 09 1993 12:30 | 25 |
| Gee I thought there was an extended discussion of 55-65 Giants - But...
insubit'bly Sean mcd is very well respected by his peers. My problem
is what those peers consider excellence and what it comes down to in my
opinion is excellence=dullness.
Developing drama in a broadcast which Schenkel did and Red Barber/Mel
Allen did and even Johnny Most did is not part of "excellence" today
and an announcer who was graded an A+ in that skill but occassional
mispronounced a name or didn't have a batting av. ready would be
dropped three levels prior to ever making a network.
I tell you another announcer who S*cks bigtime and that's that phony
ex-Oakland Raiders coach and all his charts - John Madden
So - there
Oh- On Parcells - I basically agree with your premise 'saw on how we
just have to have patience with Parcells. It's a tough gamble for the
long suffering and if wasn't for things like the penalty improvement
and ability and willingness to tackle in the secondary it would be
tougher.
But with coach P you don't see a lot of communication about questions
like "What happend to Marv Cook?" -
|
56.729 | | MKFSA::LONG | The day of reckoning has arrived... | Thu Dec 09 1993 14:45 | 8 |
| >>team oriented as IRVING FRYAR
/er, you been trying some of Mr Saia's drinks or what? Yunz are
really getting sickening with this Almighty Irving crap. It sure
is a good thing Mac doesn't DWELL on past B'town sports figures.
billl
|
56.730 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Dec 09 1993 14:49 | 18 |
| Madden is great.....
McDonough is fun to listen to. And I like McCarver too.
re Simms throwing to Fryar.
Well, I guess Simms has one thing that no Patriot QB has
(or probably will ever have) and that's a Super Bowl MVP
for the 3rd best passing game of all time.
The Patriot fans can only wish that that stiff Grogan
or Tony Ankle Biter Eason, or Hodson, or Flutie had
one 100th of the leadership ability that Simms has......
'Saw
|
56.731 | And a Heisman | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 09 1993 15:55 | 1 |
| Flutie has more champeenships than Simms so there.
|
56.732 | :*) | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Thu Dec 09 1993 16:11 | 4 |
|
Midget football don't count.......
Claybone
|
56.733 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 09 1993 16:43 | 3 |
| Parcells was recently asked to confirm NBC's Paul McGuire's report that
said Parcells wanted a running back in the upcoming draft. Parcells
basically called McGuire a liar.
|
56.734 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | It happened again!!!!!! | Thu Dec 09 1993 16:57 | 7 |
| re.733
guess that confirms that they'll take a running back in the firsted
round then huh??
JaKe
|
56.735 | lotsa lumps on monday | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Thu Dec 09 1993 17:03 | 5 |
|
I pity the poor running back they pick #!
Cadzilla2
|
56.736 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | It happened again!!!!!! | Thu Dec 09 1993 17:24 | 8 |
| <<< Note 56.735 by SPECXN::BROWN "Real Men only need 12 bits" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
re p_name-------------------------------------
But PDP8's are nonexistant nowadays.
JaKe
|
56.737 | Pats are on the right track (In NE) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 10 1993 09:32 | 12 |
| -2 why would you pitty the poor RB that the pats pick. Look at
the last 3 or 4 place teams and who has a better OL and is rebuilding
at a better process/speed then the pats. This is year #1 in the
parcell's era. Ive been buying/reading the usa today and trying to
read about Faulk, I havnt come accross anyone in the press (in NE)
that doesnt think he'll go #1 or doesnt think he's worthy of going
#1. I think I like the Idea of Marshall running in a pats uniform
and it looks like the right thing to do. Now if ownership will let
them spend Mucho Denero on another #1 pick, signing bonus etc, plus
Free agency this alone will take a miricle (Again assuming they lose
this week to the bengals).
Dozers
|
56.738 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Fri Dec 10 1993 09:57 | 2 |
| How many kibbles go with those bits?
|
56.739 | They still have a place in the world | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:03 | 12 |
|
Re: Jake,
We still have 8's running typeset shops all over the country. Typesetters
love'm most say they kicks the pant off any of the high powered 11's. In
some applications speed is of little need compared to reliability or ease of
use. I loved working 8's and 11's never knew what you would find hanging of
the buss with these machines. I've seen everything from Beer bottle makers
to Space shuttle flight simulators.
Cadzilla2
|
56.740 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:10 | 8 |
| Any machine where you can toggle in the boot routine from the front panel
is a manly machine. Even the old 11s.
Nothing like hitting "Deposit" and then, ultimately hitting the "Execute"
toggle....
'Saw
|
56.741 | how 'bout them paper tapes? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:11 | 0 |
56.742 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:18 | 3 |
| This year's poor Patriot RB is something like 5th in the AFC in
rushing. Pats' rookie RBs have captured 2 Rookie of the Year awards in
the past 5 years.
|
56.743 | | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:23 | 17 |
|
Love them toggle in routines.
I'm working on this 11 at Rice Univ.loading up one of my test routines. This
guy in a white lab coat with a slide rule hanging out comes over and watches
me flippin switches. Then the guy says " Are you assembling that in your head"
I set and think for a second and say yes I guess so and he walks off.
Many customers were amazed at the ability of our FE's being able to slam a
toggle in into their systems blink a few lights, swap a 74H74 and leave with
a smile One of the few jobs I ever had that people would tell you "I hope I
never see you again" and not have a negative meaning.
Cadzilla2
PS to the earlier reply about kibbles. You get three nibbles with 12 bits,
we also used to call 12 bits a chomp since it was a byte and a nibble.
|
56.744 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:26 | 5 |
| A buddy of mine had a few routines he'd use to make the lights do different
patterns and stuff. always blew people away.....
'Saw_whose_first_machine_was_an_11/40
|
56.745 | Vacuum tubes (aka valves) are manly 'tronics | MKFSA::LONG | The battle is joined... | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:30 | 6 |
| Mac, I don't think anyone is saying that Russell isn't good, at least
I think he is. IMO though the Pats could use a swift, break away
runner to comliment him.
billl
|
56.746 | Will be an intresting weekend | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:38 | 6 |
| Russell is very good at breaking thru the line, but cant outrun the
average Linebacker let alone a SS or DB. A Marshall Faulk can break
around outside or with a good whole break thru the line and then the
secondary could be in trouble.
Mab
|
56.747 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:41 | 2 |
| Since you guys don't like me moving notes around, how about moving this
enthralling discussion about ancient computers over to the Junk Note.
|
56.748 | Pro Bowl a possibility for Russell | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:52 | 7 |
| Leonard Russell is third in the AFC in rushing, with 787 yards. He is
only 46 yards behind Seattle's Chris Warren, who is second. They both
average 3.7 yards per carry. Thurman Thomas is first, of course, with
the currently injured Barry Foster the only other runner within 100
yards of the top three.
NAZZ
|
56.749 | What it comes down to: "best available player" | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 10 1993 11:02 | 9 |
|
Where does the Patriots' running game rank as a whole, though? Right
near the bottom of the league, I believe. The fact that this situation
exists at the same time that Russell is 3rd among individual runners
underlines the need for another option. So what else is new? Just one
more for the wish list...
glenn
|
56.750 | In the bottom half, but not the bottom quarter | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Fri Dec 10 1993 11:04 | 3 |
| Pats are 9th in the AFC in rushing, 19th overall in the NFL.
NAZZ
|
56.751 | Thurman the man this year for Rushing Title and Total Yrds | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 10 1993 11:19 | 13 |
| Speaking of Rushing it looks like Emmitt will win the Rushing Title
in the NFC. With Both Sanders and Ricky Watter scheduled to miss 2
games, that Leaves Emmitt and the Eric Pegram of atlanta as the top
2 guys in the NFC, actually Pergram, Bettis and Brooks are all within
20yrds of each other and roughly 80-100yrds behind emmitt. What does
Thruman currently have for yardage and whats his lead in the AFC look
like ? If pegram repeats his performace VS the 49ers he'll be right up
or pass Emmitt (for this week). But dallas is at minny so who knows
what Emmitt will do. Thurman has Philly, one of the worst Rush Defense
this year. Looks Like Thruman, but Emmitt is actually still in the
hunt do to injuries to barry (both) and Ricky Watters.
MairB
|
56.752 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 10 1993 11:54 | 8 |
| � Where does the Patriots' running game rank as a whole, though? Right
� near the bottom of the league, I believe. The fact that this situation
� exists at the same time that Russell is 3rd among individual runners
� underlines the need for another option.
Noone is arguing against this, glenn. What started these comments
about Russell and the Pats' running game was the potshot someone took
about a rookie RB being crazy to play for the Pats.
|
56.753 | Nickname Entry for mf | AKOCOA::BREEN | Tim Fox, Tim Golden | Fri Dec 10 1993 12:16 | 5 |
| If we draft him can we nickname him "Field" Marshall Faulk?
After Marshall Foch the French AEF commander of WWI
Just a thought
|
56.754 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Fri Dec 10 1993 12:18 | 12 |
| > If we draft him can we nickname him "Field" Marshall Faulk?
My guess is that's what Chris Berman will call him.
> After Marshall Foch the French AEF commander of WWI
Trivia for the day -- he's interred in the same place where Napolean's
tomb is, in a room off the main room where Napolean is....
'Saw
|
56.755 | Just call 'em the Faulking Patriots | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Dec 10 1993 13:15 | 3 |
|
|
56.756 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Fri Dec 10 1993 13:29 | 8 |
| � /er, you been trying some of Mr Saia's drinks or what? Yunz are
� really getting sickening with this Almighty Irving crap. It sure
� is a good thing Mac doesn't DWELL on past B'town sports figures.
It ain't easy being the beacon of 'troof in The ::SPROTS Dark Ages,
but it's something I'm compelled to do.
/Don
|
56.757 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Fri Dec 10 1993 13:31 | 10 |
| Not Marshall Island Faulk of the Pacific?
Not Marshall Peter Faulk?
Not Marshall "Gee, do you mind if I ask one more question?" Faulk?
I think Peter has to be in the running...
Here he comes through the line he serpentines to the left and
serpentines to the right...
|
56.758 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Dec 10 1993 15:55 | 17 |
|
MAC, if'n ya was to leave RIGHT NOW, ya might be able to WALK to the
OPP by the 17th, so hit the road. (8^)*
>> -< They still have a place in the world >-
>> Re: Jake,
>> We still have 8's running typeset shops all over the country. Typesetters
I broke into this place fixing 8I's and 8E's and 8M's....we still have
a few out there, but not many.
JaKe
|
56.759 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Fri Dec 10 1993 15:59 | 12 |
| The light indicator panel from our RPO3 drive (you know, the controller
had like 250 half-height cards....) at my very first job 12 years ago,
is sitting downstairs over my friends desk.
He was the FE who kept it running through thick and thin. Back in the
days when men were men and boards were fixed with lots o' solder....
Ah, the good old days......
'Saw
|
56.760 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Dec 10 1993 16:07 | 6 |
| An 8I was tons of half heighth cards, too, one gate or so on each card,
and if ya never trouble shot one, it was a bitch just getting started,
but once ya learned the way to do it, it was lot easier.
JaKe
|
56.761 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no I'm really very, very shy | Fri Dec 10 1993 16:12 | 4 |
| I still think they should evaluate LeRon Johnson's performance in the
Senior Bowl before going with Faulk. 2K-yard rushers are rare.
Besides, isn't this all for naught if the Pats beat the Bengals this week?
|
56.762 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 10 1993 17:01 | 4 |
| � Besides, isn't this all for naught if the Pats beat the Bengals this week?
Not necessarily. Word has it that a QB might declare and the Bengals
are interested in drafting a QB.
|
56.763 | Heath Shuler | AKOCOA::BREEN | Tim Fox, Tim Golden | Fri Dec 10 1993 17:31 | 11 |
| that's Heath Schuler and apparently the number 1 choice if he elects to
play and judging by his performanc vs bc last year a great talent. Now
if Pat's have number 1 again I would see them auctioning off heath to
highest bidder - say swapping 1 for 7 plus 2 and 3 but they could miss
Faulk in that case.
But there is some nfl methodology about where a top running back should
be drafted vs other skill positions - that theory would have the
marshall down around 7-10.
Bill
|
56.764 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | M. Faulk = Blair Thomas | Sat Dec 11 1993 14:31 | 3 |
| Wait a minute...I thought the Pats were deep at RB???? Mac??
JoJ_NOT
|
56.765 | my .02 on the back thang | AD::HEATH | Have pitchers and catchers reported yet? | Mon Dec 13 1993 06:58 | 16 |
|
Why all the talk about drafting a back #1 anyway. I can see that the
Pats need an outside threat, but with Russell getting 94 yesterday that
puts him about 120 or so from 1000. Last stats I saw had him ranked
2nd behind Thruman for total yardage from scrimage and I think that is
pretty good company. This team desprately needs a real wide out with
breakaway speed that CAN catch the ball (Stokes outa UCLA comes to
mind) and a dominant pass rushing d'lineman. They are not going to get
both but with the salary structure the way it is should be able to
one of two via FA. No matter what happens they will still be about 2
yrs from a playoff team ( a real playoff team not a last place padded
schedule playoff team like that AFC west team) but a least they seem to
be trying.
Jerry
|
56.766 | remind anybody else of "A Comedy of Errors?" | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 09:12 | 17 |
|
Yabbut my sides were splitting about the creativity of the Pats
yesterday when they blew the punt and turned over on their 35 yd. line.
I ain't Carnac but boy oh boy did I see a "L" on the horizon.
Great Defense
Great strategy to go for the safety
Wuzz it dumb to get the win and probably lose the #1 pick?
I remain,
if nothing else, getting enjoyment from the Pats - especially in the
4th qtr.
Kev
|
56.767 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 13 1993 10:12 | 8 |
| � Wait a minute...I thought the Pats were deep at RB???? Mac??
Jets beat the mighty 'Skins 3-0 and JoJ_Not comes back out of hiding.
As I said before, the Pats are deep at RB, but if Faulk is the real
deal, you can't pass up on that talent. He'd complement Russell very
nicely. A tandem of Russell and Faulk in the backfield with Bledsoe at
QB could make for a very nice offense.
|
56.768 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:11 | 14 |
|
Parcells is on record as saying that running back is one of the
deepest positions in the draft when asked if he would take Faulk
with the number one pick. He's obviously hinting that he wouldn't
take Faulk first but he faked alot of people out last year when
he played it close to the vest. All that may be moot after this
weekend because we might not get the number one and probably won't
because there are three very winnable games left on the schedule.
Winning two of those games would put us out of it. Then again
just about *every* game on the schedule has been winnable so who
the hell knows. The two underclassmen that I really like are Dan
Wilkinson from OSU, who has forced offenses to double and triple
team him all season long, and JJ Stokes from UCLA, who looks like a
Michael Irvin clone only a little bigger and a little faster.
|
56.769 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no I'm really very, very shy | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:24 | 5 |
| He could also draft Faulk and use Russell for trade bait for a deep
threat.
BTW - Stokes is a junior and I haven't heard any rumblings about him
declaring.
|
56.770 | or he could..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:27 | 14 |
|
Yabbut has a field goal kicker ever been drafted #1?
I had a revelation on the way in today. It said that the Pats need
a field goal kicker *for games*! They already have one for practice
sessions.
;^)
I remain,
glad I'm not Scott Sissons......
Kev
|
56.771 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:42 | 8 |
|
>> BTW - Stokes is a junior and I haven't heard any rumblings about him
>> declaring.
I know, Mikey. That why I said "The two *underclassmen* that I really
like..." I don't expect we'll hear anything from these guys until after
bowl day but this is a thin draft this year and it might be to their
advantage to come out this year.
|
56.772 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | DJ, Harmon Wages | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:44 | 13 |
| First let's hope that Patriots don't even draft in top 4, at least I'd
like them to beat Jets and Dolphins.
Parcells seems to be the type to just draft the best player especially
since pat's have needs everywhere. But I could see him trading down
but if he does so I hope he does better than Singleton and Agnew for
Cortez (that was the case a few years back, right?)
The team I just can't believe in is the Giants but they are sure
proving me wrong - the presence of LT must simply make the entire team
better
Bill
|
56.773 | a quote from a Cincy newspaper | WKRP::LEETCH | U.S. Messaging Practice, Cincinnati | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:48 | 2 |
| "It was one of those classic games where it was a shame that one team had to
win"
|
56.774 | huh? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:52 | 12 |
|
Yabbut Bill,
Please explain why you don't want the Pats to pick in the top 4.
mindlessly inquiringly and all that......
I remain,
like Commander Data, confused by that
Kev
|
56.775 | It's better to watch a winner than a loser | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 13 1993 12:04 | 4 |
| � Please explain why you don't want the Pats to pick in the top 4.
Cuz if they aren't picking in the Top 4, that means they'll have won a
few more games.
|
56.776 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Mon Dec 13 1993 13:39 | 2 |
| I thought I read somewhere that Lohmiller was a #1 pick...
|
56.777 | I'm with Mac' on this one | AKOCOA::BREEN | DJ, Harmon Wages | Mon Dec 13 1993 13:39 | 9 |
| Yeh, what 'mac said. As a fan I'm a bit of a diehard, eternal
optimist type and as a rule will always root for the underdog, so pat's
are right up my alley.
And I should have said beat the colts as they've already dropped two to
the jets.
There's no draft choice in history which whould suffice for a victory
over Miami.
|
56.778 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Poofter's Froth, Wyoming plans ahead | Mon Dec 13 1993 14:07 | 3 |
| wasn't Russell Erxleben (sp?) of Texas a first-rounder?
dr.a
|
56.779 | (8^)* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:46 | 7 |
| I gots a question on the "STUPOR BOWL" that was played yesterday
between the Patsie and the Bungholes, with a score like 7-2, were there
any home runs, doubles, triples????? What was the line score on the
runs hits and errors???????
JaKe
|
56.780 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:48 | 17 |
|
I'm pretty sure that he was. Even got on the cover of SI before the draft
talking about how great he was...never made it in the pros though...supposedly
he had a tough time adjusting from the tee they used in college to the pros
where you kick off the surface....
The pats are better off picking up some cast off from another club or signing
a kicker as a free agent instead of wasting a draft choice on one. Rare is the
case of a Jason Hanson or a John Casey that kick as well as billed out of
college...the Greg Davis story is more typical (get cut froma bunch of teams
until you stick with one and become a serviceable kicker..didn't he play for
the Pats one season?)
If Dallas can pick up an Eddie Murray than the Pats should be able to get
somebody decent....
Metz
|
56.781 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:51 | 2 |
| Clemens had a shutout until they brought in Russell who blew it...
|
56.782 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:59 | 8 |
|
I thought John Lee from UCLA went in the top three rounds one year.
As for Sisson, I wouldn't bail on him anymore than I'd bail on Bledsoe.
The kid is young, he's obviously talented and it's not like he's costing
us a playoff spot. If the offense could score touchdowns it'd take a hell
of a lot of pressure off of the kid. Chances are though, that they'll cut
him and he'll catch on with someone else and have a good career.
|
56.783 | IF the redskings get anybody theyll be tough again next year | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:05 | 11 |
| Is scott sisson the next Nick Lowery :-)
In a few years maybe Sisson's box scores will resemble Lowery's.
I know one thing for sure if the Pats cut sisson he'll turn out
great ;-).
The pats blew it this week, Faulk is worth more then a win over
the Hapless Bengals. IF the Pats tie Wash, what would the 1st
tie breaker be between the 2 clubs (Assuming wash doesnt win again
and NE beat indy only), Thanks in advance.
mab
|
56.784 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:06 | 4 |
|
Yabbut there was also a unforced error late in the 4th inning.
Almost allowed the C's to tie the game.
|
56.785 | kickers in first round? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:09 | 16 |
| re: Erxleben (sp?)
I think that Erxleben from Texas, Tony Franklin from Texas A&M, and a guy
from Arkansas (Steve Smith?), who were place kickers in college, were all
taken in the firsted round of the draft.
A while back someone (ESPN?) did a special on them and the pressures of
placekicking. Erxleben ended up punting for Miami I think. Franklin went
to the Eagles and was the only one to end his career place kicking. The
other guy evidently couldn't even handle the pressure of being drafted
went on a suicidal binge and ended up paralyzing himself in a wreck while
intoxicated.
Anybody know who the Arkansas guy was?
TTom
|
56.786 | The golden age of kicking, courtesy of the SWC... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:29 | 7 |
|
> Anybody know who the Arkansas guy was?
I think his name was Steve Little, not Steve Smith...
glenn
|
56.787 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:31 | 2 |
| Back when kicking on a tee was legal...
|
56.788 | yep | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:58 | 5 |
| Thanks Glenn.
Definitely Steve Little. Is he still alive?
TTom
|
56.789 | but I asked about the #1-not first round | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Dec 13 1993 17:02 | 1 |
|
|
56.790 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 13 1993 20:33 | 5 |
| The patsies don't deserve another #1 pick, or even in the top 10.
For crying out loud, they have been in line of getting top picks for
years, and look what its done for them.
Tim
|
56.791 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no I'm really very, very shy | Mon Dec 13 1993 22:37 | 1 |
| I thought that was the Sacramento Kings.
|
56.792 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Tue Dec 14 1993 12:50 | 6 |
| Kudos to the Foxboro Stadium security for removing the "Home of
Missin' Sisson" sign last Sunday. It's these kind of criminal and
degenerate acts that negatively impact what we're there for... to get
drunk and start fights.
/Don
|
56.793 | Litigation, USA | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Tue Dec 14 1993 12:58 | 2 |
| The couple who brought the sign in are suin' the
Patriots. Makes sense to me.
|
56.794 | Glob interview of RI couple today | AKOCOA::BREEN | DJ, Harmon Wages | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:11 | 14 |
| From what I've read the Patriot's security has blown it big time. From
what I've read about the sign holders they might be willing to accept
an apology but if they decide to sue they will be able to expand their
season ticket area.
Interesting all the lies that security have [allegedly] telling about
the incident, including the most damaging if true falsehood, that the
couple were swearing at cops since the guy is a notary, process-server
in RI and the slander would damage his reputation.
The "real" police appeared to act very professionally, the alleged
misconduct appears to be on the part of stadium security.
The new St Louis owners may have to beware ...(I think I'm kidding)
|
56.795 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:17 | 5 |
| From what I've read the couple weren't drunk, weren't starting
fights and weren't leering at the cheerleaders. They deserved to get
tossed!
/Don
|
56.796 | Rev 2.0? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Dec 14 1993 14:10 | 13 |
|
Yabbut speaking of miss'n Sissin :^)
anybody catch the new MacDonald's commercial? I only caught a bit of
it but the words, "Over the wall, through the window....." were there.
At the end the final shot was 2 guys standing on a blimp with a
footsaball. Who are these guys? What are the lines?
I remain,
thinkin Air_Mikey was in it too
Kev
|
56.797 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Tue Dec 14 1993 14:18 | 4 |
| You missed Michael in there saying "these guys are good (CHOMP)"...
They're Pete Stoyanovich (Dolphins) and Chip Lohmiller (Washington
un-PC team).
|
56.798 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I'm Santa Claus! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:58 | 9 |
|
>>They're Pete Stoyanovich (Dolphins) and Chip Lohmiller (Washington
>>un-PC team).
I liked the line on MNF lasted night after Stoyanovich missed a FG,
they said Lohmiller was probably on his way to get his Big Mac.
JaKe
|
56.799 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 14 1993 16:01 | 6 |
|
>> I liked the line on MNF lasted night after Stoyanovich missed a FG,
>> they said Lohmiller was probably on his way to get his Big Mac.
Ayuh, that's a real knee-slapper.
|
56.800 | da ninj's speculation | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Dec 15 1993 13:35 | 31 |
|
Yabbut so while chatting with the Ninj, naturally, the subject of
the Patriots "4-Sale" situation came up. Ninj said that he hoped
they'd stick around because in addition to keeping his job, he'd be
able to travel with the team nexted year to Toronto for a_exhibition
game. Seems that since the Pat's would be the home team, he, as the
teams official head <mumblefratz> would be working it. He thought
that he and Susan would use the trip as a vacation & maybe stop off in
Syracuse to see Coach Mac.
Ninj sees the "4-sale" like this:
Firsted, he said that Orthwein doesn't care who he sells the team to.
If he sells it to a St. Louis group who tries to move the team, Kraft
will sue the Pats.
If he sells it to a St. Louis group who doesn't try to move the team,
Kiam will sue the NFL.
If he sells it to Kraft, he doesn't think anybody will sue, as long as
Orthwein gets his money.
anyway, it was shirley good to chat with him. Hope he makes it on
Friday.
I remain,
reporting like from MRO
Kev
|
56.801 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 15 1993 14:03 | 8 |
| � teams official head <mumblefratz>
Statistician, I believe.
� If he sells it to a St. Louis group who doesn't try to move the team,
� Kiam will sue the NFL.
Why would Kiam sue?
|
56.802 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Dec 15 1993 14:07 | 8 |
| From what I've read, Kiam is only threatening to sue if the team is
sold and moved to another city. He claims the NFL refused to allow
him to do so.
If Orthwein moves and keeps the team for himself, I not sure what
Kiam will do.
Mike
|
56.803 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | Nature bats last | Wed Dec 15 1993 14:07 | 4 |
| Cuz the league wouldn't let him move the team/break the lease, thereby
"forcing" him to sell the team at a well-below market price.
Mark.
|
56.804 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Dec 15 1993 14:40 | 12 |
|
If Orthwien keeps the team and moves it, then the Krafts sure for
breaking the lease. Vic Kiam does nothing under this move.
hth
I remain,
thinking the Pats ownership situation might make for a good daytime
soap
Kev
|
56.805 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:34 | 9 |
| Figures. Just when the Pats start to look like a team they'll head
off to Saint Louis. Eddie Anvilhead blames the NFL and says no to the
SissyPlex (his land holdings around the stadium have nothing to do with
this stance) and Will the Shill blames Orthwein and pleads us to call
our state representative and beg him to open our wallets and build the
impoverished new prospective owners a brand spanking new SissyPlex.
UGH!
/Don
|
56.806 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:59 | 7 |
| It looks like a basic for-certain, done-deal that the megaplex bill will
die on the floor of the house before the session ends. It is doubtful
it will even come up for discussion.
Not that it matters, there is no way it would/will ever pass.
=Bob=
|
56.807 | Hey Andleman - can you say "Conflict of Interest"? | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Mon Dec 20 1993 15:00 | 5 |
| Of course Eddie is against the megaplex - he owns the parking lots
around the stadium!!! He'll be making zero dollars if a megaplex
gets built in Boston.
NAZZ
|
56.808 | I dunno; there's 100+ acres there ready to be dozed... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 20 1993 15:17 | 19 |
|
> Of course Eddie is against the megaplex - he owns the parking lots
> around the stadium!!! He'll be making zero dollars if a megaplex
> gets built in Boston.
On the other hand, I have heard both Bob Kraft and Andelman say that
the land around Foxborough is worth more for the usual Rte. 1 strip mall
development than it is for parking cars 10 times a year. Because
we're talking about a lot of land if the stadium comes down completely,
it seems believable. In an article in the Globe a while back Kraft was
quoted as saying that he wasn't completely against the idea of a
megaplex, if his interests were to be taken care of (I think mainly if
he were to be able to buy the Pats). I'm even somewhat skeptical that
he couldn't be bought out by the St.Louis interests if the price were
right, althought Kraft does seem to be a decent guy who's sincere in
his desire to buy the Pats...
glenn
|
56.809 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:30 | 7 |
|
I personally don't trust Kraft either. I think Kraft's ultimate plan
is to buy the Patriots. Make us tax payers build a Megaplex. Move the
Pats into the Megaplex. Then rip down Foxboro stadium and lease the land
to developers. So he keeps on making mucho bucks.
Ron
|
56.810 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Dec 28 1993 09:22 | 7 |
| Break up this new NFL juggernaut..
Will be nice watching the Pats harpoon the FrozenFish to end their
season.
MikeL
|
56.811 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 28 1993 10:26 | 7 |
| 9000 tix are still unsold for Sunday. Fortunately the cold weather is
supposed to continue. Hopefully that means the Pats will not sell out
the stadium and then Giants-Cowboys will be on at 1PM.
The Crazy Met
btw - for this Sunday, Go Pats!
|
56.812 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Tue Dec 28 1993 12:09 | 16 |
| Hey Leary, like I said we'll be in Kritzie's parking lot around
10:30 and bring your longjohns. The halftime show was a hoot. Toys
(BackwardsR) Us lumped a whole bunch of toys at midfield and had a
contest for these little (no one looked older than 7) kids to see who
could get the most. The poor tykes were freezing, but that pile of
gifts presented a dilemma for them (survival or presents). Toys
(BackwardsR) Us also brought a real life Barbie onto the field. Now
with the wind gusting up to 25-30 MPH and Barbie having one of those
hooped skirts on I knew it was only a matter of time before we got a
Marilyn Monroe shot. Unfortunately Barbie had on a pair of longjohns
and heavy duty ski boots. 8^( The only problem with the Pats winning
this Sunday is that it will prolong the playoff hopes of the Jesters
(until around 21:00-21:30 on Sunday night when the Oilers have a 28-0
lead).
/Don
|
56.813 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Dec 28 1993 14:14 | 15 |
| Yo Slash,
I'll bring the Bushmills if you bring the flamethrower. We can
have molotov cocktails on the barbie. Kritzie's it is. Ah cain't
wait to see dipstick Shula snarlin' and chatterin' away at the
refs as his playoff hopes go up in smoke as the Patsie's beach
the 'phins.
Er, is the post-game apertif soiree still en vogue? Black tie or red?
MikeL
P.S. Ah'll bring some canned Japanese tuna to the tailgate. Ya know
there's gotta be some dolphin in that can...8^)
|
56.814 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Tue Dec 28 1993 16:29 | 7 |
| �Er, is the post-game apertif soiree still en vogue? Black tie or red?
Nah, we're having our "annual season ticket holder breakup meeting"
at Alexis (a clothing optional dance establishment) in Stoughton after
the game. You're welcome to come, and bring your pool winnings!
/Don
|
56.815 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Tue Dec 28 1993 17:00 | 6 |
| Hey, MikeL, speaking of pool winnings....what ever happened to the
prize I was supposed to get for being the closest to guessing the
score in the ND-FSU game?
billl
|
56.816 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 28 1993 17:12 | 4 |
| you didn't really expect an ND fan to give a prize to a "non-believer",
did ya?? :-)
The Crazy Met
|
56.817 | dadgum infernal mail | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Dec 28 1993 20:57 | 13 |
| Now hold on a sec boys.
Billl, ah did mail ya the "prize" via Decsnail, hail gotta be
close to a month ago. Check your infernal mail.
Lissen, oh Bellevue-one, ah done mailed you the copy of the
Boston Globe (remember the one that had BC all over it) whence
BC beat ND... via snailmail, Did ya git it?
I remain,
not trusting our version of Pony Distress
MikeL
|
56.818 | does this guy work for Pulishers Clearing House? | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Wed Dec 29 1993 08:16 | 9 |
| "The checks in the mail."
Sheesh, never heard that one! It's really ok, MikeL, I forgot about it,
too. I was kinda looking forward to reading the book, though.....
Whaddaya mean, the prize isn't a Lou Holtz autographed copy of "Under
the Tarnished Dome"?!?!?!?
billl
|
56.819 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 29 1993 09:34 | 10 |
| Listening to the sports talk shows on Monday and Tuesday I figured
the direction of any conversation regarding the Patriots would've been on
the win Sunday. But, much to my dismay, most of the callers were claiming
the Sunday's game proved the need for a SissyPlex. Ugh! The day the Patriots
become like the Colts, Oilers (ever see them win in Foxboro post-Bum when the
termperature dipped below 40�?) or any of the other GirlyMon domed teams is
the day I turn in my tickets. Keep the New England team mainly, just say NO
to the SissyPlex!
/Don
|
56.820 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Wed Dec 29 1993 10:24 | 20 |
| re .819
Rat on!
Although I'm not as rich as you Slasher, so I cain't afford season tics, I agree
that the SisyPlex would turn a team with potential into a bunch of pansies.
Speakin' of the elements, I was watching hightlight of the Packers game Sunday,
in which they clenched a playoff birth (go Pack). They said it was the second
coldest day that they have ever played in Labeau Field (we all know what the
coldest on was). I was amazed to see that, despite this, Sterling Sharp was
playing with bare arms! I then began to notice on the hightlight from all the
cold weather places, and this was prevailant among receivers and o-linemen.
I thought back to the ice bowl game, and remeber all the players wearing many
layers of long sleeves. In fact I remember reading in "Instant Replay" that
the o-linemen would cut their longjohns off at the knee so they wouldn't
hamper their movement, but other than that, piling on the layers. Could it
be that football players are tougher now? Nah, must be the steroids.
=Bob=
|
56.822 | The state legislators 8^)=convention center | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Dec 29 1993 10:36 | 1 |
|
|
56.824 | Needs a dome that cain support real grass | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:11 | 12 |
| Actually the key selling point fer the Megaplex is not the football
stadia but the "potential" of conventions which would garner the
buckeroos, kinda like Indy and Texas stadia. Much debate over
the wisdom of banking on potential conventions to hep pay for itself.
However if the Megaplex is approved ( I really think it ought to be
considered) they oughtta be smart and obtain enuf adjacent land upfront
jest in case the BoSox decide to cash in.
JMHO
MikeL
|
56.825 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:20 | 8 |
| Yes MikeL I did get the copy of the Boston Globe that you
sent. Thanks.
The Steelers in onf their Super Bowl years played a playoff game in freezing
weather. The defense played in short sleeves to intimidate the opposition.
Guess since then everyone has been doing that.
The Crazy Met
|
56.826 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:26 | 12 |
| The biggest joke is that Boston will get a Super Bowl if they build
this monstrosity. The one in Detriot� was a disaster and the only
reason Minnesota got the last cold-weather Bowl was because they
bartered for it with Rozelle. The Vikings were the deciding vote on
whether to keep the Instant Replay Rule and Pete wanted to win so bad
that he gave Minnesota a Super Bowl for their vote. Rich corporate
executives don't want to bring their mistresses to cities where any
temperature over 0� is considered a warming trend. You can put the
whole damned city of Boston under a dome but the NFL still ain't going
north for any more Super Bowls.
/Don
|
56.827 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:39 | 11 |
| �the o-linemen would cut their longjohns off at the knee so they wouldn't
�hamper their movement, but other than that, piling on the layers. Could it
�be that football players are tougher now? Nah, must be the steroids.
Well =Bob= the fact is that lots of today's players wear pantyhose
to keep warm because it is light and insulates well. Now I don't know if
that makes them tougher. Somehow I find it hard to picture Dick Butkus
fussing with his Leggs' Queen Size before taking the field to play the
Packers.
/Don
|
56.828 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:49 | 5 |
| Hey =Bob= nice to finally see you in this notesfile. Last week you
promised to keep things going in here and then you go and blow off
yesterday. Some people! :-)
The Crazy Met
|
56.829 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Wed Dec 29 1993 13:32 | 12 |
| re .828
I done mah best Met, but my clients (like that guy Leary) are keepin' me kinda
busy. Yesterday was an exception, when the grip that beseiged the
McCullough-cluster headed in my direction. Still kinda got it, so don't get too
close to this note when younz read it.
Panty hose don't sound too mainly, but if it works. I suppose it is hard for
d-linemen to grab a hold of the hose when doing the hand-to-hand thang that goes
on with the line these days.. But then again, this is from a guy who wears
tights to run in during winter.
=Bob=
|
56.830 | Pshaw Slash 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Dec 29 1993 14:27 | 16 |
| Why Slash,
These rich corporate execs don't have to take their mistresses.
There's plenty of young local ladies willing to meet cross-sections
of the American male. Good healthy restaurant dining, theatre,
etc.. Why don't you remember the throngs of civic-minded young
ladies who flocked to Faneuil Hall area when the Navy and Tall Ships
were in? What a way to show the world Beantown's hospitality!
Why the highlight of the Tall Ships weekend was busloads of patriotic
young lasses from Leominster/Fitchburg to enrich Boston with their
special CMASS culture.
And ah heard the new Megaplex might be the sweepstakes winner for the
1999 Final Four!
MikeL
|
56.831 | any update | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 15:04 | 4 |
| so how close are the Pats to selling out the stadium for the Miami game on
Sunday??
The Crazy Met
|
56.832 | move not final | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Thu Dec 30 1993 12:09 | 40 |
| Article: 7280
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.massachusetts
Subject: Patriots owner: Sale is not final
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 93 17:32:07 PST
FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- New England Patriots owner and Chairman James
Orthwein said Wednesday that it is not too late to keep the team in New
England, but a new stadium would be needed to entice local buyers.
There has been speculation that one of the cities that lost out in
the recent expansion process -- St. Louis, Baltimore or Memphis -- will
try to entice a current NFL team to relocate. The league recently
awarded expansion franchies to Charlotte, N.C., and Jacksonville, Fla.
``I have read the press reports relative to Governor (William) Weld's
statements today to the effect that there is a 'possibility' that the
New England Patriots will be sold early next month to an out-of-state
operation. While the sale process, which began in September, is ongoing
and near a conclusion, I want to state categorically that no decision
has been made to sell the franchise to any group at this point,''
Orthwein said.
``The franchise has been for sale. There is nothing new to that. For
many months now I have been saying that without a long term resolution
to the venue situation, it is unlikely that a local buyer could pay a
fair market price for the team in New England and capitalize and operate
a competitive NFL franchise.
``Clearly, Governor Weld has been a strong supporter of the Megaplex
and understands its tremendous year-round benefits to the community, not
just the 10 times a year the facility would be available to the
Patriots. I remain hopeful that the situation will be resolved in
everyone's best interest,'' Orthwein added.
Orthwein reportedly has warned the NFL that he would take legal
action if the league interferes with the sale of the Patriots.
The Boston Globe reported early in December that Orthwein sent a
letter to NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue claiming he has no agreement
with the league to keep the team in New England. Orthwein added that the
league would violate anti-trust rules if it tried to keep him or a
potential buyer from moving the team.
Tagliabue has stated that Orthwein signed an agreement stating that a
vote of approval from the other team owners would be needed in order for
a team to move.
|
56.833 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Thu Dec 30 1993 12:45 | 13 |
| I just can't figure this thing out. Didn't Kraft say that if
anyone tries to move the team he will have the Federal Bankruptcy Court
file an injunction against it? Isn't this an ironclad lease? Is
Orthwein and/or the St. Louis group getting bad legal advice? Is there
in fact a loophole out of the lease? Or is Orthwein such a rich mama's
boy that he's never had anybody say "no you can't do that" in his whole
life? Is it that the entire NFL wants to ignore the fact that
because the Sullivan's messed up royally the Patriots' fate is sealed
for another 9 years? After the year 2002 the Patriots can go anywhere
they want, to St. Louis, to a SissyPlex, anywhere. But until then
they're stuck, or somebody pays Mr. Kraft lots and lots of money.
/Don
|
56.834 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Thu Dec 30 1993 13:04 | 12 |
| Troof be told, I suspect that Orthwein doesn't give a rat's ass who he sells
the team to. His goal is to position the situation such that no buyers will be
scared off. There is no clear cut reason why the new owners can't move the team
to another city (Orthwein has straight armed the commissoner to back off, and
thus doesn't need league approval), move the team to a Sissyplex, or keep the
team in Foxboro. Orthwein isn't making as many statements these days, and is
waiting for the folks at Goldman-Sachs to tell him who the highest bidder is.
Meanwhile, what will all those suddenly unemployed Patriot Cheerleaders do to
make ends meet if the team moves?
=Bob=
|
56.835 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Thu Dec 30 1993 13:14 | 13 |
| =Bob=, a Federal Bankruptcy Court judge can tell everybody the NFL,
Budweiser, WalMart what to do. And unless I've read wrong Kraft has an
ironclad lease that GUARANTEES the Patriots play all their home games
in Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium until 2002.
With regards to the cheerleaders, I've already spoken to them about
taking their show on the road, kind of like the Baltimore Colts Band
does now. Course instead of playing at football games I'm trying to
convince them to put a little more adult sophistication into their act
to make it more marketable and give them flexibility as to where they
"perform".
/Don
|
56.836 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Thu Dec 30 1993 13:35 | 10 |
| The lease is what makes things so confusing. I heard a Dook Univ. law professor
on Dale Arnold's show earlier in the week, and he was saying that the lease
has a covenant that requires that the team perform at the stadium 10 days a year
for the duration. This covenant is what would allow a judge to force the new
owners to abide by the lease. I dunno, awfully complicated.
Keep up the good work with the cheerleaders, Slash. I'm glad that somebody has
their best interests t heart, and is looking to forward their careers.
=Bob=
|
56.837 | no surprise here | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Thu Dec 30 1993 14:04 | 4 |
| The lease is only as good as the lawyers defending it versus the lawyers
trying to get outta it.
TTom
|
56.838 | Pat's last game in New England is Sunday - don't miss it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Dec 30 1993 14:20 | 10 |
| I am becoming wary of Orthwein packing and moving this team in early
january after the legislature kills the plex bill.
Or considering that the primary value of the team is the franchise
contract and the player contracts, he can sell these and let the new
owner worry about helmuts, tackling dummies and barbells.
The new owner just simply starts selling tickets and lets Orthwein deal
with the lawsuits with the 200 million he received for the team. And
these suits can be handled by the promise of a quick expansion entry.
|
56.839 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Thu Dec 30 1993 14:26 | 13 |
|
� The new owner just simply starts selling tickets and lets Orthwein deal
� with the lawsuits with the 200 million he received for the team. And
� these suits can be handled by the promise of a quick expansion entry.
Thing is that Orthwein can sell the team, and be nothing more than a co-litigant
in any law suits, and will likely not even be named. It will not be Orthwein
that will move the team, it will be the new ownership group. They will be the
ones breaking the lease with Foxboro.
Jimmy will have nothing to do but count his money from the sale of the team.
=Bob=
|
56.840 | This baby is over! - I hear singing, do you hear singing? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Dec 30 1993 14:34 | 10 |
| Right Bob, and what exactly can they do to the new owner in court
except ask for money.
The new owner in St. Lou or Memphis just tells Vincent,Drew,Andre etal
to show up this July prepared to play in new gear.
At what point can Kraft, town of Foxboro, whoever actually restrain
someone since they no longer will do it in Mass.
|
56.841 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Thu Dec 30 1993 14:42 | 6 |
| A federal bankruptcy court has jurisdiction outside of the state of
Massachusetts. I've read where Kraft could stand to make over 150
million dollars in damages if the team is moved now. That's more than
it would take to buy the team!
/Don
|
56.842 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Thu Dec 30 1993 15:05 | 9 |
| What Slasher said!
Actually, that's why it's so muttled. It would seem that legally, that Kraft
et al. are all set. It's just the spector of the legal battle that makes things
confusing.
This one has a long way to go.
=Bob=
|
56.843 | federal bankruptcy court implications? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Dec 30 1993 16:11 | 7 |
| > A federal bankruptcy court has jurisdiction outside of the state
You may have a point if a bankruptcy court is still involved. Is this
from Kiam's going into receivership?
This facet of the business hasn't been explained in my readings and
listening but it does modify my previous note (possibly).
|
56.844 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Jan 03 1994 08:44 | 7 |
| GREAT game for the Pats yesterday, knocking off the fish.
Let's see, that means that the Pats finish off at 5-11. Not bad for
Parcells first year. It's better than the 3-12-1 he had with the Jints.
'Saw
|
56.845 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Mon Jan 03 1994 09:38 | 4 |
| The Steelers and all their fans thank them, too.
billl
|
56.846 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 03 1994 12:16 | 13 |
| � FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- New England Patriots owner and Chairman James
�Orthwein said Wednesday that it is not too late to keep the team in New
�England, but a new stadium would be needed to entice local buyers.
He supposedly has at least 2 local buyers "enticed". One owns
Foxborough Stadium, the other owns the Bruins.
�it is unlikely that a local buyer could pay a
�fair market price for the team in New England and capitalize and operate
�a competitive NFL franchise.
Ah, there it is. The local guys apparently aren't offering what he's
asking.
|
56.847 | why can't we get players like that? | OUTSRC::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 03 1994 13:44 | 1 |
56.848 | | USCTR1::KING | | Mon Jan 03 1994 13:48 | 5 |
| KAtz will NEVER own the Pats.... Orthwine and him really HATE each
other with a passion....
REK
|
56.849 | The pats are gonners, it figures, playoffs next year | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jan 03 1994 15:40 | 12 |
| Well another note said the st louis group has 270M to spend so if the
price tag (or offer) is 200M they have 70M to use towards paying
damages to K-Corp. I dont get it, why dont they just buy the Rams
for 175-200M and save the 70M and go nuts in FA, etc....
Why take the pats (other then orthwein pushing this group the pats).
Orthwein is a swindler, I just hope Ban Bud takes off and Bud/Bush lose
billions in sales due to this buisness venture...(anyone know where I
can get a ban-bud t-shirt)...
mab
|
56.850 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Mon Jan 03 1994 15:52 | 14 |
| >> Orthwein is a swindler, I just hope Ban Bud takes off and Bud/Bush lose
>> billions in sales due to this buisness venture...(anyone know where I
>> can get a ban-bud t-shirt)...
I don't care for Orthwein either, but I would be very careful where
I wear that t-shirt. I would be especially careful not to wear it
anywhere near Merrimack, NH, where the Anheiser Busch Brewery is one
of the biggest, if not the biggest, employers in the area.
Folks 'round here don't take to kindly to people trying to put them
out of a job, especially over some danged football team.
billl
|
56.851 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Tue Jan 04 1994 12:01 | 6 |
| They're history. The minute St. Louis didn't get a team it was a
done deal. But at least my last game there was a thriller. Parcells
will never go to St. Louis unless they renegotiate the contract and
give him a lot more money. Bill will be coaching Atlanta nexted year.
/Don
|
56.852 | not so fast....... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jan 04 1994 12:16 | 24 |
|
Yabbut I don't share your opion(tm) slasher. The way I see it,
Orthwine is the only one who might make out when he sells the team.
The other NFL owners, who probably get zilch from the sale, are open
to bigtime lawsuits and huge financial losses (potential is there).
Consider the fact that Kiam only got $100M when he was "forced" to sell
the team. If the St. Louis group pays the rumored $200 million,
couldn't Kiam sue under the anti-trust laws and collect triple damages
(from the NFL owners)? Then Kraft sues the Pats, collects his $70-$80
million, the Town of Foxboro jumps in and does their thing.
I see this possibly amounting to over $500 million dollars involved and
I don't think the money grubbing owners want to expose themselves
(financially) to those kind of dinero's. (my hallugen effect from
DiNz's & 'Saw's schroom factory)
BTW, I thought I heard that the St. Looois Stadium isn't ready for
occupancy and won't be until 1995. Am I right?
I remain,
right handed but potentially incorrect!
Kev
|
56.853 | Pats play in Busch, maybe? | SLBLUZ::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:22 | 17 |
| RE: <<< Note 56.852 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
>> BTW, I thought I heard that the St. Looois Stadium isn't ready for
>> occupancy and won't be until 1995. Am I right?
Kev,
You are correct, sir. The lovely white elephant in downtown StL will not be
available until the 1995 season. But, if the Pats do move here, a deal will
more than likely be worked out for them to play in Busch Stadium for 1994 (at a
cost of some large $$'s, I'm sure)
Jim()
|
56.854 | megaplex postponed | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:25 | 31 |
| Article: 7323
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.massachusetts
Subject: Weld, leaders agree to postpone 'megaplex'
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 16:51:43 PST
BOSTON (UPI) -- Gov. William Weld and House and Senate leaders agreed
Monday to postpone legislative action on a controversial $700 million
sports-convention complex for Boston, which is seen as vital to keeping
the New England Patriots in Massachusetts.
Weld said the press of other legislation prevented passage of the so-
called megaplex bill before the end of the current session at midnight
Tuesday. But he said he and Senate President William Bulger and House
Speaker Charles Flaherty had agreed to take up the measure as soon as
the Legislature reconvenes for its 1994 session Jan. 10.
The governor, who had warned just last week that the Patriots could
be moved out of the region if the megaplex bill was not OK'd soon, said
he was now confident the measure would be enacted in time to prevent any
such move.
``I think it's increasingly unlikely that the NFL would permit a team
to move if this megaplex legislation is approved. I just don't think
it's going to happen,'' he told reporters.
Patriots owner James Orthwein, who put the team up for sale last
fall, has promised to keep the Patriots in Massachusetts only if the
megaplex is built.
Flaherty, who has opposed Weld's plan to pay for the complex with
revenues from a fleet of floating gambling casinos in Boston Harbor,
introduced an alternative financing measure Monday. He said the two
plans would be the ``sole matter'' before the lawmakers at the Jan. 10th
session.
|
56.855 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:30 | 7 |
|
Too funny.
Where's the money for this megaplex coming from?
|
56.856 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:39 | 4 |
| � Where's the money for this megaplex coming from?
Bond issue. We won't have to pay taxes on it, our kids will.
|
56.857 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:51 | 7 |
| � You may have a point if a bankruptcy court is still involved. Is this
� from Kiam's going into receivership?
Happened under the Sullivans. Chuckie, I believe owned the Stadium
and Kraft and Karp scooped it up prior to Kiam buying the team.
/Don
|
56.858 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:56 | 5 |
| /er - other way around. Kiam bought the team and then lost in the bidding
for the stadium. Interesting article in Sunday's Globe about the stadium and
things that went on there.
The Crazy Met
|
56.859 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:02 | 8 |
| So is a bankruptcy court still involved with the stadium and or
patriots?
I thought the buying of the stadium and selling of the patriots to
Kraft and Orthwein resp. cleaned up that mess.
What exactly would a bankruptcy court have to say about Patriots
leaving?
|
56.860 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:03 | 3 |
| bankruptcy court is out of it.
The Crazy Met
|
56.861 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:05 | 8 |
|
> bankruptcy court is out of it.
Think of bankruptcy court as the Mets/Jets of the megaplex soap-opera
scene...
glenn
|
56.862 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:13 | 5 |
| re: .861
huh??
The Crazy Met
|
56.864 | Pats should've kept him | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:06 | 3 |
| I was surprised to hear Irving Fryar's agent this morning state that
Irving has been an ordained minister as of 1� years ago. Nice to hear
something good about athletes for a change.
|
56.865 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:15 | 7 |
|
>> -< Pats should've kept him >-
Because he's an ordained minister? Maybe we can get the draft rights
to Billy Graham instead.
|
56.866 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:01 | 3 |
| No because he was the only deep threat they had and the only receiver
worthy of drawing double coverage. A receiver like that was made for a
QB like Bledsoe. His role as a clergyman has nothing to do with it.
|
56.867 | Who'll be laughing when Fryay retires in two years | KALI::MORGAN | | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:18 | 5 |
| As has been mentioned, the Patriots didn't LET him go. He was traded
for a 2nd round draft pick. Wouldn't it make sense to see who the
draft pick is before calling it a bad move?
Steve
|
56.868 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:19 | 13 |
|
>> No because he was the only deep threat they had and the only receiver
>> worthy of drawing double coverage. A receiver like that was made for a
>> QB like Bledsoe. His role as a clergyman has nothing to do with it.
Then where were you a month ago when Mac and Slasher were beefing
about the Pats letting Irving go? I don't remember you singing this
tune back then or all season for that matter because the Problem Child
has had a Pro Bowl year. I think if you hadn't found out that he was
a clergyman you wouldn't be touting him now. If Irving has gotten his
act together then good for him but from what I understand, he dropped
a probable touchdown in Miami's crucial end of season loss to the Pats
- typical of him. I don't want him back at all.
|
56.869 | I sure don't miss Irving | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:28 | 6 |
| Yea, Billy Graham wouldda made a great linebacker in his day...
Actually, I think Fryer had three or four productive years in NE. I think that
Vincent Brisby will be as good as Irving was during those good years.
=Bob=
|
56.870 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 14:29 | 7 |
| You can't tell me the Pats wouldn't have won some of those close games
if they didn't have Fryar. If draft positioning and rebuilding are a
higher priority than winning games, and the 2nd rounder is a decent
player, then it was a good move.
A month ago I was preparing for finals and is irrelevant as him being a
minister.
|
56.871 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:18 | 14 |
|
>> You can't tell me the Pats wouldn't have won some of those close games
>> if they didn't have Fryar. If draft positioning and rebuilding are a
>> higher priority than winning games, and the 2nd rounder is a decent
>> player, then it was a good move.
We had this discussion about a month ago. Go back about 100 replies and
check it out if you're interested.
>> A month ago I was preparing for finals and is irrelevant as him being a
>> minister.
Mike, I don't remember you *ever* saying anything about Irving until now.
|
56.872 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:26 | 5 |
| > Mike, I don't remember you *ever* saying anything about Irving until now.
How long have you been following SPORTS? I haven't said anything
recently, but I know I bashed him along with others in the archives
when he seemed to have a nose for trouble.
|
56.873 | So I exaggerate, but not much-- I did hear "playoff" talk | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:41 | 11 |
|
You know, according to many of the experts, if the Patriots had had
Matt Bahr and Irving Fryar all season long, they would now be holding
homefield advantage throughout the playoffs. Right. It doesn't work
that way. It's the old "everything that went right with the overhaul
still would have been there but everything that went wrong would have
been fixed" syndrome. These guys were 2-14 last year. It's called a
rebuilding move, and a good one at that.
glenn
|
56.874 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:43 | 3 |
| Well elaborate on the Matt Bahr move. How many games did they lose by
missing a last second field goal? Seattle in Foxboro was one that
comes to mind, but that may be unfair since it was a 50-yard attempt.
|
56.875 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:20 | 12 |
|
� How long have you been following SPORTS? I haven't said anything
� recently, but I know I bashed him along with others in the archives
� when he seemed to have a nose for trouble.
Oh, I get it. You bashed him when he had a "nose for trouble" (btw, "nose"
problems were never mentioned with Irving), but now you think the Pats made
a bad move by trading him. But it had nothing to do with him being an minister
now. Same guy. Same team. And those finals must have really klept you out of
::SPROTS. Probably limited you to 12 notes per day in the Suns note.
Hmmm.
|
56.876 | you read into replies too much | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:49 | 1 |
| Check again, Bob. That's Suns note has been quiet since June.
|
56.877 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:55 | 3 |
| � Check again, Bob. That's Suns note has been quiet since June.
You must have meant January.
|
56.878 | well said! for your reading enjoyment | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 10 1994 19:40 | 16 |
| This is an excerpt from the article by Phil Dine of the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch that was written as a response to the hatchet job done by
Dan Shaughnessy (what else is new). Keep in mind that folks from St.
Louis have never been all that fond of New York. And now for your
reading pleasure; especially for our esteemed MtM.
"Boston, Hub of the Universe? Get real. There may be no other city with
such an inferiority complex, such an identity crisis. Stung because
down deep they know they're really a quaint northern suburb of New
York, Bostonians spend many hours seeking novel ways to put down New
York. New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way
station to Cape Cod."
The Crazy Met
|
56.879 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 11 1994 08:36 | 18 |
|
>> Stung because down deep they know they're really a quaint northern
>> suburb of New York,
Yeah and MIT is just a satellite of the Bronx Television Repair School.
>> Bostonians spend many hours seeking novel ways to put down New York.
And when we're not doing that we're usually making 1/32 scale models of
the first Thanksgiving out of belly button lint.
>> New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way station
>> to Cape Cod."
If New Yorkers are using Boston as a way station to Cape Cod then they're
even dumber than we usually give 'em credit for. Boston is north of Cape
Cod and New York is south of it. You may want to write that down, TCM.
|
56.880 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Fight the power | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:01 | 7 |
| What's the verdict on Drew Bleddsoe after his first full season? We didn't get
to see more than a couple of plays in England, because our coverage concentrates
on top clubs (no offence intended).
Cheers,
Mike
|
56.881 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:13 | 7 |
|
>> What's the verdict on Drew Bleddsoe after his first full season?
That his arm was every bit as good as advertised. He made a lot of rookie
mistakes which was expected but under the right coach, and Parcells *is*
the right coach, he'll be one of the best quarterbacks in the league in
two or three years.
|
56.882 | No other receivers they had could've done better | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:13 | 5 |
| Irving Fryar would have made a big difference on the pats especially
for that deep threat they did not have. It would have opened it up a
bit for the other receivers as well. Speed can kill a team.
stig
|
56.883 | Way to speak from a position of strength, you traitor you... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:19 | 10 |
|
> New Yorkers, conversely, rarely think of Boston except as a way
> station to Cape Cod.
Unless you're TCM, of course, in which case it's your livelihood, your
sustenance, and the place where your teddy bear awaits for you when you
come home at night...
glenn
|
56.884 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:30 | 4 |
| �He made a lot of rookie
� mistakes which was expected
And he made fewer costly ones than his veteran backup Scott Secules.
|
56.885 | I still think they made the right pick with Bledsoe | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:48 | 35 |
|
> Irving Fryar would have made a big difference on the pats especially
> for that deep threat they did not have. It would have opened it up a
> bit for the other receivers as well. Speed can kill a team.
Except Fryar isn't really that great deep threat that everyone seems
to think he is, especially when he's playing in the weather conditions
that the Patriots were once again confronted with. We saw that for
many years. He's a good all-around receiver, a great blocker, and an
excellent runner *once he's got the ball*. Fryar would have helped to
some extent, yes, but I just don't see him as this guy who was going to
take all this pressure off Bledsoe by being wide open every other play.
He's more of a possession guy across the middle, without the hands but
with the big-play ability once he has the ball.
That last game from Bledsoe against the Dolphins was one of the best
performances I saw from a QB all year (granted, not that many NFL
games). The ability to complete some of those passes well downfield
by just bulleting the ball into very small available openings was just
spectacular. Rick Mirer got the early jump on Bledsoe as far as public
opinion went this year, but at the end of the year when you look at
what each had done it was very close, accounting for the few games
Bledsoe missed. Their average yards per attempt was almost identical,
and Bledsoe had the edge in producing TDs and avoiding INTs. Mirer
just edged Bledsoe in the bogus NFL QB ratings, but only because of the
formula's double-counting effect between completion percentage and
yards/attempt (where if two QBs produce the same number of yards on the
same number of passes in a drive, the one with the higher completion
percentage and shorter passes misleadingly rates higher). I was very
happy with the way Bledsoe improved this year from beginning to end,
when it wasn't even certain that this 21-year-old would even play much
this year. I think the future is very bright for Bledsoe.
glenn
|
56.886 | Sad to say but Orthwein is really holding the pats back | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Jan 11 1994 09:52 | 28 |
| FYI, the patriots had 7 games that could have been out right won or
tied by just hitting FG's that they missed. 3 games were lost with
missed FG withing the 30yrd line. You cant say what would have happend
had bahr been there all year because bahr was under contract elsewhere
(I believe he was starting for Philly early in the season ?).
But had the Patriots got a quality Kicker from day 1 yes they could
have easily made the playoffs in place of Pittsburg and proberbly had
the same results, out in 1...
Im not too worried about the team, the players or the coach. Its the
owner and there homefield that needs to be settled. They may end up
losing many of there Free Agents and lose out on signing a few good
free agents if orthwein doesnt sell this team locally and soon. They
cant miss this oppurtunity. Its the first year in the cap, they have
plenty of money and there's a few key holes to bee filed and a few key
players that need to be resigned, and this may take money that orthwein
wont allow to be spent....
Whats better for this team, if theyre allowed to go to St Louis Group
and move they will resign the players needed and grab some free agents,
and K-corp said they will spend the money necessary to build a winning
team. But if neither of these happen in time to land Free Agents and
protect out own players this team will be in serious trouble. They
could go downhill next year, and if orthwein still owns the team during
free agency and draft this team will go down hill.....
mab
|
56.887 | It's an illusion... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 10:07 | 26 |
|
> FYI, the patriots had 7 games that could have been out right won or
> tied by just hitting FG's that they missed. 3 games were lost with
> missed FG withing the 30yrd line. You cant say what would have happend
> had bahr been there all year because bahr was under contract elsewhere
> (I believe he was starting for Philly early in the season ?).
>
> But had the Patriots got a quality Kicker from day 1 yes they could
> have easily made the playoffs in place of Pittsburg and proberbly had
> the same results, out in 1...
I disagree that the Patriots could have "easily made the playoffs" with
another kicker. This was the kind of conclusion I was talking about
where you assume every missed kick would have been made, you just tack
on the missing points at the end of the game assuming that the other
team would have played the game the same way, tie games become wins, etc.
This team was 1-11 at one point (before putting together a nice run,
mostly against teams who were also out of it). That it is not a
playoff team by any stretch of the imagination and certainly not for
the lack of a kicker. For starters, the Patriots gave up 50 more
points than they scored, much more than can be accounted for by missed
FGs (yes, I know the Raiders made the playoffs scoring less than they
allowed). Don't be deceived...
glenn
|
56.888 | Is it all part of the bluff? | KALI::MORGAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 10:11 | 5 |
| At this point, what difference does a Megaplex being built make to
Orthwein? Isn't it true that he's received the bids from all
interested parties?
Steve
|
56.889 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 11 1994 10:27 | 18 |
|
What everyone seems to be forgetting about Irving Fryar is that he
wanted out. It wasn't a matter of playing for a draft position or him
not fitting into Parcells' style. Irving wanted out. Parcells said from
Day 1 that he would make every effort to trade anyone who wanted to
be traded and Irving wanted to be traded. With all the underclassmen
fattening up what would have otherwise been a weak draft, I'm espec-
ially happy that Fryar is gone even if he *has* been a deep threat for
Miami.
As for Bledsoe vs. Mirer, other than playing for Parcells, the biggest
thing working in his favor this year was that he played behind an excep-
tional and young offensive line. Unlike previous Pats QBs Plunkett and
Grogan, who were thrown to the wolves and ended up battered and bruised,
Bledsoe has been well protected. I really don't know how good Seattle
line is but from what I hear - not very. I don't think anyone in Seattle
rushed for a thousand yards either. I like Mirer but I can do (and quite
nicely) with Bledsoe.
|
56.890 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 10:28 | 28 |
|
> At this point, what difference does a Megaplex being built make to
> Orthwein? Isn't it true that he's received the bids from all
> interested parties?
He may have already received the bids but any deadlines he's imposed
are entirely artificial. If this sweetheart Megaplex deal becomes
official, it raises the local purchase price or at least cements the
bids that were predicated on it going through.
The more I read about it the more I agree with the guys who say that
this Megaplex project with football stadium (as opposed to without)
looks to be the biggest taxpayer-funded gravy train in state history.
On one hand we have Bob Kraft claiming that he's willing to upgrade
Foxboro Stadium for $50M to a perfectly serviceable, revenue-generating
facility, at worst at only partial public cost. On the other we have
the $250M+ to turn the much-needed convention center into a football
stadium with the seating capacity needed maybe a dozen times a year (plus
the one-time Super Bowl event-- right), plus an additional $100M to be
doled out to Worcester, Springfield, etc. just to keep everyone happy,
plus whatever neglected amounts required to pay off Bob Kraft to move
the team there. Is this really necessary (I'm with Slasher on this one,
personally it isn't even desirable, much less necessary)? Maybe to pay
the blackmail to keep the team here, yes, but economically,
culturally, intrinsically, and whatever else, I don't think so...
glenn
|
56.891 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 11 1994 11:37 | 7 |
| I was wondering myself how he got that Boston is a waystation to Cape Cod
in there but thought it only fair to quote the paragraph in its
entirety.
Glenn, you're slipping.
The Crazy Met
|
56.892 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 11:54 | 6 |
| �For starters, the Patriots gave up 50 more
� points than they scored, much more than can be accounted for by missed
� FGs
Most of those 50 can be accounted for in the Jets blowout where NY
racked up 45 points.
|
56.893 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 11:56 | 10 |
| � What everyone seems to be forgetting about Irving Fryar is that he
� wanted out. It wasn't a matter of playing for a draft position or him
� not fitting into Parcells' style. Irving wanted out.
Irving wanted out when MacPherson came on board. Instead of just
letting him have his way, Mac talked to him and Irving ended up with
his best season in New England.
Come to think of it, I don't remember Fryar saying he wanted out when
Parcells came on board.
|
56.894 | At least I had a perch to slip from... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:07 | 9 |
|
> Glenn, you're slipping.
Well, TCM, it just seems to me that you continue to neglect a pretty
fundamental problem with your arguments that New York is a superior
place to live than Boston: you're here and it's there.
glenn
|
56.895 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:10 | 11 |
|
> Most of those 50 can be accounted for in the Jets blowout where NY
> racked up 45 points.
And they got most of them back from the woeful Colts. Again, this is a
one-sided point of view where everything in the debit column can be
magically erased but everything in the credit column was an automatic,
a given...
glenn
|
56.896 | Not exactly the response of a guy who wanted to be here... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:13 | 9 |
|
> Come to think of it, I don't remember Fryar saying he wanted out when
> Parcells came on board.
Maybe not publicly, but he sure did respond like a pig in slop when he
found out he was gone...
glenn
|
56.897 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:20 | 2 |
| It was definately a good move for Irving. If Marino hadn't gone down
you might have seen him in another Super Bowl.
|
56.898 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:28 | 12 |
|
>> It was definately a good move for Irving. If Marino hadn't gone down
>> you might have seen him in another Super Bowl.
It really was a good move for Irving. He had a great year. He's in the
Pro Bowl. And like you say, the Dolphins would have gone deep into the
playoffs with Marino at the helm. But I do remember Irving doing a lot
of squawking in the off-season about it being late in his career and
wanting to play for a contender. He made that abundantly clear to
Parcells who granted his wish and from what I've seen of Irving this
season, he has no regrets about not playing here. It's too bad some
Pats fans can't sever the cord as easily as Fryar did.
|
56.899 | Please sell the team locally QUICKLY !!! | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:59 | 41 |
| Im not saying the pats would have won all 7 of the games that FG made
the difference or even if they had made all attempts that they would
have won 1/2. But they would have won more, no doubt, and most
importantly they finish 5-11, split with Miami and lost too pittsburg.
With a better Kicker would Parcells have gone for the win with pitt
or got the tie and went for the win in OT ? So say they won 1/2 of
the other games that were winnable with a decent kicker, remember a
few of these attempts came in the 4rth qtr when if were converted the
opposing team would have had little time to stage a comeback. So if
there able to win 1/2, plus pittsburg that puts them at 9-7 in a 3 way
tie with Miami and Denver (Pitt would be at 8-8 had they not got lucky
vs pats and wouldnt have even made it into the playoffs). So too say
they would have been in the playoffs with a decent kicker is not a
stretch, its the same as saying they still wouldnt have made it with a
decent kicker, you just dont know. But bottom line with Bahr, a decent
kicker, as there kicker they were 4-0, Bahr was 5 for 5 on FG tries and
I dont beleive he missed any Extra points.
The Detroit game in Week 2 Sisson missed a 27 pt FG for the WIN, ended
up going into OT and NE lost. So no question on this one a Decent FG
kicker nails that one and NE wins. Detroit went for the win and didnt
make it, so I dont see how they would have made it if NE had made the
FG ?
Week 3 Lost too seattle by 3, ok Sisson Missed a 54 Yrd, not too many
FG kickers are a lock at 54yds...Still a loss
Week 8 VS Seattle, a 1 pt loss and Sisson missed a 48, and a 41, I have
to beleive a Decent FG Kicker makes at least one of them, result a NE
Win...
So maybe its a stretch to say they would have made the playoffs but I
still think, no doubt a decent kicker they win at least 3 of those 7
close games and finish at least at 8-8.
I havnt seen the schedule but I still beleive, a local owner before
free agent/draft signings and this teams in the playoffs next year.
Orthwein or NonLocal owner this teams wins less games next year then
this year....
mab :-(
|
56.900 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Tue Jan 11 1994 13:32 | 9 |
| Parcells asked each player point blank "do you want to stay or go". Staying
meant on his terms, which included working out all off-season in Foxboro,
coming to camp in sahp and understanding the new systems (offense/defense), etc.
Irving obviously didn't want to do this, so he was gone. Some guys said they
wanted to stay, but didn't play by Parcell's rules,and were gone (John Stephens),
and some guys did everything he asked and were gone (Hugh Millen).
=Bob=
|
56.901 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 11 1994 16:43 | 5 |
| Glenn,
many folks do things that are not optimal.
The Crazy Met
|
56.902 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,D.Reeves | Tue Jan 11 1994 16:52 | 11 |
| Pats were not "almost" a playoff team. They were a 5-11 team and
last time I looked a 9-7 record was needed to qualify for the dance.
That puts the Pats 4 games out after finishing the season with a four
game winning streak. Would've, could've and should've don't mean
squat. Now don't get me wrong the Pats made strides, but they beat a
hapless Colts team and a Miami team without healthy defensive backs.
There is still a lot of work to be done if this team wants to really
contend next year. And please take the my city is better than your
city to the Junk Note where it belongs.
/Don
|
56.903 | plex on hold - what next | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:17 | 5 |
| Legislature put megaplex on hold for a month while special,
"independent" committee looks it over.
I am anticipating Orthwein coming out and saying that sale is on hold
for a year.
|
56.904 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:21 | 3 |
| Why would Orthwein say that?
The Crazy Met
|
56.905 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,D.Reeves | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:21 | 3 |
| SissyPlex makes the team worth a lot more in a sale.
/Don
|
56.906 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:23 | 4 |
| only if he selss locally. and there is no guarantee that the
Megaplex will be built and if it is that it will have a stadium.
The Crazy Met
|
56.907 | politicly saying... | SALEM::STIG | | Wed Jan 12 1994 07:13 | 3 |
| there dancing in the house begins...
stig
|
56.908 | They be gone | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:20 | 4 |
| Anyone know the words to "Meet me in St. Louis"??
MikeL
|
56.909 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:22 | 8 |
| >
> Anyone know the words to "Meet me in St. Louis"??
>
> MikeL
Not enough of them to post here....;^)
|
56.910 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:43 | 6 |
| A start, maybe Tommy or JaKe can finish them
Meet me in St. Louis, Louis
Meet me at the fair
The Crazy Met
|
56.911 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Whitewater/Whitewash | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:56 | 11 |
| So did Kraft really offer 160 million to Orthwein for the team? Is
the offer dependent on the state building a Sissyplex? Does Orthwein's
lawyer have a hidden agenda to move the team to St. Louis? How come
House Speaker Charles Flaherty is now skeptical about a bill he wrote
only last week? Is James Orthwein now taking new bids when he stated
all the bids were in?
You have to love the merging of Boston sports and Boston politics
on this issue. This is better than General Hospital!
/Don
|
56.912 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:02 | 2 |
| I thought Kraft's offer had nothing to do with the Megaplex. Kraft
said he'd upgrade Foxborough.
|
56.913 | It's not like the NFL has ever left a city high and dry... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:06 | 15 |
|
I was angered by the pols when they nearly sabotaged the New Boston
Garden late in the game (before they correctly measured the public
sentiment) but not this time. On this megaplex we've got not much
more to go on than a bunch of vagaries about how it's going to cost
somewhere between $700M and $1B when all of the pork futures are
called in, with Gov. Weld running around with ideas of an in-house
megaplex casino dancing in his head. And of course all of this has
to be straightened out by Saturday to JBO's personal satisfaction.
But to brilliant minds like Will McDonough's the solution is very
simple: just pass something now, regardless of the petty details.
Take it on Uncle Will's word that the NFL will make things right.
glenn
|
56.914 | | USCTR1::KING | | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:18 | 14 |
| Kraft offferd 160 mill
St Louis offered 190 mill with 50 mill going for expected lawsuites,
courts etc so the offer is actually 140 mil...
REK
PS Anybody who wants/pushing for the megaplex is a F*CKING IDIOT who
does not have a F*CKING clue on how this state works. People seem to
forget the Hynes Convention center that was remodeled to the tune of 90
million ans was going to bring in conventions etc. The hynes convention
center has been loaded with ex-poles that have been appointed for life.
PSS The Hynes was suppose to bring it 30-40 mil revenue for Mass. It
loses the state 25-30 million to run each year... Yep, I want another
place to put old pols when they leave the statehouse....
|
56.915 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Whitewater/Whitewash | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:35 | 10 |
| Yabbut REK, without the SissyPlex we cain't be considered a World
Class City. Governor Weld said so. Ah, but with the SissyPlex we can get
Final Fours, Super Bowls, The Democratic and Republican National conventions,
Madonna Concerts, Shriners' Conventions, World Cup Games, NBA and NHL Some
Star Games, SummerSlams� (I put that in for you especially), The SEC
Championship Game and a host of other profitable events. Why the state
will have so much money that every resident will own a Cadillac and dine
out every night at the Ritz!
/Don
|
56.916 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:05 | 4 |
| >will have so much money that every resident will own a Cadillac and dine
>out every night at the Ritz!
If they put a restaurant in the 'plex you could eat there......
|
56.917 | /er, Jasper's is probably a better bet than the Ritz | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:10 | 11 |
| It is always amazing how screwed up things get in MA when they deal
with such issues. Few if any other states have so many people who have
fiefdoms that need to be bribed in some form or another to get anything
done. Petty issues become so important that it is astounding. A percieved
slight by anyone can kill projects.
I suppose there might be some states in the deep South (Louisiana comes to
mind) that might also work in some such fashion, but I would guess nothing
compares to the way they do things in the Commonwealth.
The Crazy Met
|
56.918 | just an observation | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:18 | 12 |
| TCM, I know for a fact that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania works
in exactly the same fashion and I'd be very suprized if New Yuck
wasn't the same. For some bizare reason it seems to depend on
whether the state is predominatly Democrat or Republican.
Not that I'm trying to interject politics into the discussion
at all, 'cause I'm not, but in the six different states I've
lived in, only the predominatly Democrat states are run like
the "fiefdoms" you mentioned.
billl
|
56.919 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:22 | 11 |
| > Not that I'm trying to interject politics into the discussion
> at all, 'cause I'm not, but in the six different states I've
> lived in, only the predominatly Democrat states are run like
> the "fiefdoms" you mentioned.
>
It's just a fact of life. If you look at the origins of each party, and
you look at their core philosophy of how involved government should be
involved with the people's lives, it makes sense that it is like that....
'Saw
|
56.920 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:23 | 6 |
| amazingly enough NY works a lot better than MA in that sense. NY has had
Republican governors - though not for a while - and one of the 2 legislative
houses has been Republican for a long time, the other Democrat for a long
time.
The Crazy Met
|
56.921 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:25 | 1 |
| NYC now has a 7 year old mayor... ;^)
|
56.922 | You don't have to look that far south... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:33 | 7 |
|
As if the Tammany Hall political machine wasn't/isn't the most corrupt
in the history of this country. Massachusetts and Boston in particular
are bad but, please, TCM, open your eyes...
glenn
|
56.923 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:36 | 8 |
|
>> amazingly enough NY works a lot better than MA in that sense.
Not to turn this into another NY vs. Mass thing BUT both of New York's
football teams play in New Jersey and the Yankees and Mets play in
what are considered the two worst stadiums in baseball. So, I'm not
sure exactly how New York does this thing better than Mass, though
that wouldn't be any great feat.
|
56.924 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:34 | 8 |
| Glenn, we were talking about today, not the 1930's. Hope the history lesson
helps.
This was not a my state is better than yours debate. Billl made a resonable
statement and question; you're getting to be about as bad as Mac with the
knee jerk responses.
The Crazy Met
|
56.925 | TCP!!!!!!!!! | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:46 | 5 |
| TCM, you are going to ruin your reputation sticking up for a
'burgh fan.
billl
|
56.926 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:55 | 4 |
| nah, remember Glenn is also a Pitt fan :-)
The Crazy MET!
|
56.927 | Yes, I know, you were just acting as a helpful "change agent" ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:10 | 8 |
|
Geez, TCM, somehow I just didn't read a "reasonable" opinion of
something like "this is a problem for many entrenched Northeastern
cities with archaic political systems" (Billl's point, and a good
one) into your original statement. How silly of me!
glenn
|
56.928 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:14 | 5 |
| > How silly of me!
about the only sensible thing you have said.
The Crazy Met
|
56.929 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Jan 12 1994 16:04 | 10 |
|
>>Meet me in St. Louis, Louis
>>Meet me at the fair
Just don't look for me in New England
Cause there won't be no football there.
JaKe
|
56.930 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 16:41 | 6 |
| �It is always amazing how screwed up things get in MA when they deal
�with such issues. Few if any other states have so many people who have
�fiefdoms that need to be bribed in some form or another to get anything
�done.
You need to get out more.
|
56.931 | Mac that was precious | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 20:02 | 5 |
| hahaha Mac telling me I need to get around more; this from a guy who
believes a major road trip is to NY State. heh heh.
The Crazy Met
|
56.932 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:08 | 4 |
| Novelist Tom Clancy is interested in buying the Patriots and moving
them to Connecticut. With Parcells and Clancy running the show, will
'Saw forsake the Giants and start rooting for the hometown team and
stop being a NY/NJ wannabe?
|
56.933 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:28 | 1 |
| Paul Newman is involved in the Clancy group as well, I hear.
|
56.934 | | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:30 | 2 |
| They'll be serving Newman salads and spaghetti to those NY-wannabe
yuppies
|
56.935 | A done deal? | CAMONE::ZIOMEK | Pump up the TEST | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:50 | 4 |
| Local radio-rumor here in Connecticut this morning says this was a done
deal, last night! Can anyone confirm this?
John
|
56.936 | soap opera... | SALEM::STIG | | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:55 | 5 |
| re-2. Don't forget free Tom Selleck autographed 8x10 color glossies
for the 1st 1000 people who enter Paul Newman Stadium or will it be
mmm..Walter Payton Stadium...
stig
|
56.937 | Who's who in the Pats Lottery | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:07 | 4 |
| One of the other notes file says orthwein/Kraft have come to an
agreement that could be finalized in 4-5 Days...
MaB
|
56.938 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:18 | 24 |
| >
> They'll be serving Newman salads and spaghetti to those NY-wannabe
> yuppies
>
Hey, I'll give Newman a ton of credit for what he does, because all that
money goes to help a lot of boys and girls and other charities....
As to being a NY/NJ wannabe, do me. I like the Giants and the Red Sox,
never rooted for the Pats because they were old AFL and I never rooted
for any of those teams (I mean, who could take a league seriously whose
officials wore red/white stripes).
If the Pats move to Ct, which I still say is less likely than me winning
Olympic gold in synchronized swimming, I wouldn't root for them, and
would only go to games if the Giants were in town.
I do like Tom Clancy though. And Paul Newman was great in "Cool Hand Luke",
"The Sting", and "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid".....
'Saw
|
56.939 | Too good to be true? | CSLALL::BRULE | You may be right. I may be crazy... | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:52 | 12 |
| I'm usually a RON in this note so don't kill me.
Today's Globe had an article saying that Circus Circus inc and another
Las Vegas have both offered to build a new mega-plex for Boston
and a baseball stadium if they were given a license to open a casino in
the Boston Area.
I think this would be great for the area. We get 2 nice new stadiums to
replace the dumps we have for stadiums, instead of all the Mass
gambling money going to Conn., Vegas and Atlantic City we can keep it
in state. The tax revenues maybe could lessen our Income taxes and
maybe it would even help the economy.
Mike
|
56.940 | It will never happen | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:24 | 17 |
| Some people actually think buy adding a casino it will cause people
to gamble. Because we all know that gambling is Illegal and nobody
does Illegal Gambling.... YA RIGHT. There's more gambling in this
state then I can shake a stick at, build a casino and people will come.
Will it make some people who dont gamble now, gamble, of course but
will it turn people into gamblers, no, people who gamble, gamble.
Weather they go to Vages, Atlantic City, CN or just Las Vegas NIghts
every fri, sat somewhere in MA, Illegal sports betting, etc and little
card games here and there.
This would be greate, get the stadiums, keep the pats, get a casino
and keep some MA money in MA rather then Vages, Atlantic City and CN.
Your right, sounds too good and would work out too well, it will never
happen...
mab
|
56.941 | Cynical? | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:43 | 6 |
| It'll happen as soon as our legislators figure a way to git perennial
payola from the Vegas crowd... HAHAHA that should take all of one phone
call.
MikeL
|
56.942 | Clancy's "Patriot Games II" | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 12:46 | 30 |
|
[email protected] articles by Jan, 13 to 16, 1994:
--------
Subject: Author Tom Clancy looking to buy Pats
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 8:49:39 PST
FOXBORO, Mass. (UPI) -- Best-selling author Tom Clancy is heading a
partnership seeking to buy the New England Patriots and move the club to
Hartford.
The Connecticut Development Authority agreed to back up the Clancy
bid with state bonds. Clancy has put together a group with a number of
limited partners and would serve as general partner. Clancy has written
such best-sellers as ``Hunt for the Red October'' and ``Patriots Games,''
which were turned into movies.
The Connecticut legislature has approved $252.1 million in bonds to
build a football stadium should the Patriots move to Hartford.
Current Patriots owner and chairman James B. Orthwein has said he
would like to sell the team to local investors to keep the franchise in
the Boston area.
Orthwein has received at least three bids for the franchise,
including two that have come from investors in St. Louis and Baltimore.
Massachusetts Governor William F. Weld and state legislators recently
agreed on a bill to build the Patriots a new domed stadium to help keep
the club in the Boston area. The proposal calls for a $700 million
stadium and convention center.
The Patriots currently play at Foxboro Stadium, about 30 miles south
of Boston.
|
56.943 | or so it is rumored by WEEI | JUPITR::MIOLA | Phantom | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:16 | 8 |
|
Pats have been sold... News conference at 12:00
Buyer ...... Robert Kraft
Lou
|
56.944 | confired......???????maybe???????? | JUPITR::MIOLA | Phantom | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:23 | 6 |
|
Report has been confirmed by WBZ.
Lou
|
56.945 | Boy I hope these rumors are true | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:59 | 3 |
| Dan Duquette in the Red Sox front office. The ownership of Foxborough
Stadium and the ownership of the Patriots have been unified once more.
Life is good in New England!!!!
|
56.946 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:09 | 9 |
| I'm home today and will try to listen to the news conference.
Kraft buying the Patriots really does make the most sense; I am
assuming that unlike Kiam, et al that Kraft can actually afford the
team. My assumption is that Kraft would refurbish Foxboro Stadium, I
wonder what this does to the megaplex.
The Crazy Met
|
56.947 | JMHO | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:13 | 6 |
| >> I wonder what this does to the megaplex.
I, for one, hope the idea of a megaplex dies a nasty death.
billl
|
56.948 | contenders the year after | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:18 | 2 |
| Well at least Mass. may now reap the benefits of the Pats being a
decent team next year.
|
56.949 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:35 | 5 |
| WEEI has confirmed tha Pats sale to Kraft for a reported 160mill.
Press conference at noon.
MikeL
|
56.950 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:42 | 5 |
| and 160 mil is a very nice deal for Orthwien; especially since there
will be no law suits.
The Crazy Met
|
56.951 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:09 | 7 |
|
Great news. The megaplex can still be built for what it's needed for
(hopefully neither football or baseball), when it's needed, if it's
needed.
glenn
|
56.952 | official | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:11 | 12 |
| from Orthwein:
1. convinced the megaplex will be built - venue will be appropriate for
the football team.
2. pats himself on the back for revamping the Patriots
3. Kraft is the new owner
The Crazy Met
|
56.953 | PATS SOLD TO KRAFT | MKOTS3::NEWS | | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:45 | 12 |
| Bob Kraft bought the PATS and they are staying local.
A news conference is being held right now.
Kraft refused to comment on Foxboro/Megaplex et al.
Orthwien said Kraft's bid was highest from local bidders but
below what some out-of-state groups bid.
Hurray!!
|
56.954 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:56 | 8 |
| � and 160 mil is a very nice deal for Orthwien; especially since there
� will be no law suits.
Craze, you're kidding right? This is the 90's and whenever Fran
Murray is involved, however minor, the threat of a lawsuit is always
present.
/Don
|
56.955 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:07 | 10 |
| ok /er how is Murray involved? I thought he was out of the picture.
re: higher offers elsewhere.
But those bidders would have had to make some settlement with Kraft
over the Foxboro lease. So Orthwein may have come out with more money
this way.
The Crazy Met
|
56.956 | A rumor that I heard | CSLALL::BRULE | Car, body and brain all frozen | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:22 | 5 |
| Craze,
Was there any mention of a report that Kroenke offered 50 million for
the LEASE from Kraft?
Mike
|
56.957 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:50 | 8 |
| I didn't hear that. Kraft and Orthwein danced around how much Kraft
paid for the team. Kraft then danced around the megaplex issue. On the
other hand Orthwein in his opening statement mentioned that the coming
of the megaplex was one of the reasons that he decided that New England
was serious about keeping the Patriots.
The Crazy Met
|
56.958 | First 3 early Warm Games are a must see :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:07 | 29 |
| Even if the megaplex gets voted Yes, it wont be built for 15-20 years
(If ever) and bye then maybe New England will have the Patriots and
the Rams :-)
It sounds/looks like if (other state) buy the pats for 200M, then they
get sued for 60+M from K-Korp and then Kiam sues the NFL for 3 times
the diffence between what he sold the team for and the new selling
price ? (that one seems high) but that could amount to 300M and each
team puts in 10M to cover it. So a new owner has 200M, 60M and 10M
for a total of 270M !!! I heard the St Louis group wanted to work it
so Orthwein would be responsible for any lawsuits from the move ? Makes
no sense to sell the team for 200M if you have to pay 60-70M in damages
and only clear 130-140 when you can walk away a hero with no hassles
and pocket 160M, he didnt do this becasue of his work, promise or
verbal agreement, he did it because it meant the most hassle free money
in his pocket....
Whats the asking price for the Rams, maybe he'll turn around and use
this 160M to purchase the rams (who have no lease) and move them to
St Louis, California has what 3 other teams, SD, SF, Raiders. So then
everyone is pretty much happy. NY still has 3 teams maybe someone
should try and but the Jets and move them to baltimore/Tennesee? or
wherever the other expansion team was...
Doesnt matter too much, thanks to a Great Legal Lease Orthewein did
what he had to do to make the most hassle free profit and that just
happend to = Pats Stay in Mass !!!!!!1
mab
|
56.959 | Ain't America wonderful?!?!? | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:48 | 3 |
| Orthwein makes a tidy $60 million profit for a 19 month investment!
NAZZ
|
56.960 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:51 | 4 |
| � Orthwein makes a tidy $60 million profit for a 19 month investment!
Yabut Po' Jimmy was looking to make close to $100 mil.
|
56.961 | Jimmie O's a hero, right? | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:53 | 12 |
| Nazz etal,
Now that Jim has rebuilt Pat's and ensured their Boston survival
will the bean and cod lot go out and buy Bud by the gallon to show
their thanx (since they were supposedly ready to boycott it for the
opposite reasons).
Is it too, too naive to expect any thanx to the guy, not to speak
of public apologies by various and sundry media wags.
I suppose there's a line for season tickets at foxboro as we speak.
b
|
56.962 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:57 | 3 |
| Foxboro is now natural grass?
Tim
|
56.963 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:58 | 5 |
| Bill, New Englanders already buy Bud by the gallon.
I don't think Orthwein is entitled to any special favors from New
Englanders. The media did just what he wanted them to do -- helped him
drive up the price and get a quick sale.
|
56.964 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:59 | 11 |
| >
> Foxboro is now natural grass?
>
Yes, it was changed two seasons ago in the hopes of getting picked as
a world cup site.
It's actually not a bad turf.....
'Saw
|
56.965 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:00 | 5 |
| � Foxboro is now natural grass?
I guess Colorado and Phoenix still rely on the Pony Express for their
news. Foxborough Stadium put in natural grass over a year ago when
they bid on the Soccer World Cup.
|
56.966 | It must be friday | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:05 | 9 |
| Excuse my memory problem there little Mac. I thought it was, but
its not like they show any patsies games out here. Other than the
donks, they show AFC teams with winning records.
I would like to see the Pats get it together and bring the likes of
muffylo and fish to the level they deserve, and with Billy boy, they
just might within the nexted 2 years...
Tim
|
56.967 | I must have baaaaad taste then ??? | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:17 | 7 |
| Can an Amerikain give a Scot a true answer as to why NO-ONE likes the
Dolphins ?? I've hardly came across a noter who likes them let alone
support them.
Wrong note, I know - nobody reads the fish. (Sniff,
sniff).
Davie.
|
56.968 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:24 | 12 |
|
>> Can an Amerikain give a Scot a true answer as to why NO-ONE likes the
>> Dolphins ??
The guy I carpool with is a big Dolphins fan. The guy in the next
cubicle is a 'Phins fan too. I was very consoling when the Pats beat
them at the end of the season to put 'em out of the playoffs. There
are quite a few around here and we're in the heart of New England as
is most of this company. No real surprise that there aren't a slew of
Dolphins fans in here. I'm sure south Florida is a different story.
|
56.969 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:31 | 9 |
| My wife is a Dolphin fan. I like Marino. I made my statement
because they're defensive coach sucks and they're record is better than
they are since they play in AFC east, which has 2 good teams. Of
course the jets have had their number for years even though the jets
are average at best.
Tim
|
56.970 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 17:06 | 5 |
| � Can an Amerikain give a Scot a true answer as to why NO-ONE likes the
� Dolphins ?? I've hardly came across a noter who likes them let alone
� support them.
Digital doesn't have a large population of workers in the Miami area.
|
56.971 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 08:37 | 5 |
| The guy who sits next to me, Big John (who's been hanging out in the
softball topic recently) is a big Dolphins fan.
'Saw
|
56.972 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Mon Jan 24 1994 09:22 | 2 |
| He's a BIG fan? I thought that guy was out of business...
|
56.973 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 09:37 | 5 |
| > He's a BIG fan? I thought that guy was out of business...
No, that Big Fan was a fat slob fan. John is anything but....8^)
|
56.974 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 24 1994 09:44 | 4 |
| The guy ESPN is using to promote their College basketball broadcasts is
slowly becoming just as unbearbale as the Big Fan guy on CBS.
The Crazy Met
|
56.975 | See, it's a lot bigger... | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:04 | 2 |
| Chris Farley from SNL. I like the Big Monday ads...
|
56.976 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 24 1994 17:27 | 6 |
| TC*,
You're just mad about the way they spliced the Farlet bit into Ewing
missing those free throws a few weeks ago. ;*)
Dennis Faust
|
56.977 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 25 1994 00:26 | 7 |
| re: .976
nah, must have missed it since I don't have a clue what you are talking
about.
The Crazy Met
|
56.978 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jan 25 1994 09:00 | 12 |
|
>> they spliced the Farley bit into Ewing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yabbut wazzis???? Da Bobbit procedure? Phew, I'm glad Carol's
due anyday now, I coulda missed it had I waited!
I remain,
assuming I gotta throw away my cheeze whiz now :^(
Kev
|
56.979 | Kraft wants a winner!! | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Tue Jan 25 1994 09:24 | 6 |
| I heard that Kraft is going to give Parcells 35mil to play with so he
can get what he wants. The same amount of the limit for the salary cap.
Geez..since when has a Boston-based owner done this kind of stuff. I
like it!!!
stig
|
56.980 | Looking forward to attending a few Pats game next year | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Jan 25 1994 09:48 | 17 |
| Ive heard that they can afford to sign 4 free agents and all there
draft picks and stay under the cap, does anybody know if that not
including resigning there own players(Free agents) first ?
What top name Offensive Linemen are available in free agency ?
Also any good defensive backs, saftys or Linebackers ?
I think Tim Brown would make a great addition to there current
offensive weapons.
Maybe theyll consider going to somekind of 2 TE set and take advantage
of there 2 best WR's on the team (Cook, Coates).
I think things are looking great in Pats Land, they had a better team
then The Colts this year and the colts have to trim to make the cap,
Id say the pats are in great shape....
mab
|
56.981 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Jan 25 1994 09:52 | 5 |
| > Id say the pats are in great shape....
If not they are certainly close to being so.....
|
56.982 | Al Davis says he will match any offer... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Tue Jan 25 1994 16:29 | 4 |
| re-2. Tim Brown is a restricted free agent which means that the Raiders
WILL match the offer.
stig
|
56.983 | Pats notes file? | CADSYS::CAVE | | Sun Feb 20 1994 18:45 | 6 |
|
Does anyone know the name of the New England Pats note. I
didn't update the note when it changed nodes and don't remember the new
node.
Thanks, Alan
|
56.984 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Mon Feb 21 1994 01:13 | 29 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 4.68* Related Conferences 68 of 85
38346::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" 21 lines 24-JAN-1994 12:13
-< New England Patriots Conference is Moving >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<< LMOADM::LP$DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< New England Patriots (volume V) >-
================================================================================
Note 129.0 conference on the move... No replies
38238::MAILLET 12 lines 24-JAN-1994 09:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The LMOADM cluster (AIADM, STEPS1) will be retired during the first week of
February.
On February 1st, I will move the NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS conference to my
workstation, RMVMS. At that time, you will have to update your notebook entry
by typing the following:
NOTES> MODIFY ENTRY NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS/FILE=RMVMS::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS
Please let me if you have any problems with this.
-Ron-
|
56.985 | they also will try for WR Michael Haynes/2.5mil yr. | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Mon Feb 21 1994 02:21 | 7 |
| The Pats signed OL Bob Kratch to a multi-year contract (I thought that
they would be going after DL.) Also, the Pats tried to sign kicker Pete
Stoyanovich of the Dolphins for a 5mil for 4 year deal but he decided
to stay with the fins for 4.2mil over 4 years. I like Krafts
aggressiveness to get the players they want...
stig
|
56.986 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | TonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkank | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:03 | 6 |
| Glad that Stoyanovich didn't take the Pats offer because he isn't
worth that kind of money, but it's an indication that Scisson's days are
numbered. Kratch is a great pickup, but they still need a real wide
receiver and a pass rushing defensive lineman.
/Don
|
56.987 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:41 | 3 |
| What's with this interest in Tillman? Can he give the Pats backfield
something they don't already have or can't draft? Is it just Parcells
lusting after another Giant?
|
56.988 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:50 | 24 |
| > What's with this interest in Tillman? Can he give the Pats backfield
> something they don't already have or can't draft? Is it just Parcells
> lusting after another Giant?
Tillman is a pretty good weapon, whose gotten very little press in the
shadow of Rodney Hampton. He broke all of Walter Payton's college running
records, and he did a really excellent job filling in for Hampton this
season while Hampton was out with a knee.
He and Hampton have slightly different running styles, and I'm hard pressed
to accurately describe either. Where Hampton is a slashing type runner,
Tillman is more North/South, but he does have a little side-step that
makes a lot of folks miss.
The advantage of getting Tillman over drafting is you have someone with
experience, who knows the system -- an unknown over a known.
Personally, I hope George Young gets off his fat ass and pays Tillman
enough to keep him in NY.....
'Saw
|
56.989 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Feb 21 1994 13:06 | 8 |
| > What's with this interest in Tillman? Can he give the Pats backfield
> something they don't already have or can't draft? Is it just Parcells
> lusting after another Giant?
I haven't seen much of Tillman, but beyond Russell, the Pats don't have much.
Tillman is surely better than Kevin Turner and Sam Gash.
=Bob=
|
56.990 | Couldn't resist, I'm a cojonebusta... 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:44 | 10 |
| >> Glad that Stoyanovich didn't take the Pats offer because he isn't
>>worth that kind of money, but it's an indication that Scisson's days are
>>numbered.
Great leap_a_logic there NostraDonus...Ya think mebbe that Bledsoe's
position was threatened by dis offer to Stoyo??
8^)'s
MikeL
|
56.991 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | TonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkank | Mon Feb 21 1994 16:10 | 6 |
| Hey MikeL, kickers ain't real football players, they're soccer
wannabees who have the intestinal fortitude of one who makes a living off
his legs (none). So to pay such an individual a million dollars is a waste
of salary cap money.
/Don
|
56.992 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 21 1994 16:50 | 6 |
| Agreed on spending that much money on a kicker, and it looks like
Sisson might hafta earn his laig money on Jack'n'Jill night at
Alex's...
MikeL
|
56.993 | NFL approves Kraft | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:20 | 42 |
|
[email protected] articles by Feb 20-22, 1994:
Subject: Patriots Sale Approved By NFL
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 17:20:30 PST
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- The sale of the New England Patriots to
Robert Kraft was unanimously approved on Tuesday by NFL owners,
ensuring the team a new stability and a permanent spot in New
England.
The approval comes a month and a day after Kraft, who owns
Sullivan Stadium, purchased the team. No price was divulged, but
Jonathan Kraft, who helped negotiate the deal for his father, said
it was the highest price ever paid for an NFL franchise.
The two new expansion teams, Charlotte and Jacksonville, will
pay $140 million each for the right to join the league.
Kraft is the fourth owner in six years of the Patriots, who had
been struggling on the field and off until they won their final
four games last year under new coach Bill Parcells.
Billy Sullivan, the original owner of the team, was forced to
sell for financial reasons to Victor Kiam, who purchased the team
in 1988. Kiam then sold the team in 1992 to James B. Orthwein, who
had been part of a group trying to bring a team to St. Louis.
Orthwein then sold the team to Kraft, although he said at the
time of the sale that he could have gotten more for the team than
someone outside New England.
The approval is one of the quickest for a change of ownership in
recent NFL history.
``We had already done a lot of research on him,'' NFL spokesman
Joe Browne said of Kraft.
Kraft, who grew up in Brookline, Mass., has pledged to keep the
team in the area. It will begin play at Sullivan Stadium, but it
could move in the future to a ``megaplex'' planned for downtown
Boston.
Gov. William Weld said after the sale to Kraft that it would
take the pressure off the legislature to act quickly on the
proposed domed stadium and convention center. Until then, the state
had hoped to use it to entice the Patriots to stay in the area.
But Weld said he hopes the center will be built, a position
endorsed by NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue.
|
56.994 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | DieOnYourFeet>LiveOnYourKnees | Wed Feb 23 1994 12:34 | 4 |
| The Globe says a minimun $5.00 increase in season tickets!
8^(
/Don
|
56.995 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:54 | 5 |
| What did you expect, Slasher? Kraft just paid a bundle of money for
the club, Parcells is busy hiring ex-Giants for big bucks, Kraft is
promising improvements to the stadium, Kraft won't be collecting rent
money from the Pats, and they beat Miami in the last game of the
season. Of course prices are going to go up.
|
56.996 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | DieOnYourFeet>LiveOnYourKnees | Wed Feb 23 1994 14:18 | 5 |
| I was hoping for a 7%-10% increase, not 18%-20%. Hell, Waddle
pays $10.00 less for his tickets than I do and he's got a better
stadium and better seats than I do (though no longer a better team).
/Don
|
56.997 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 14:20 | 5 |
| �(though no longer a better team).
Well, there you go.
Be thankful the Jacobs Brothers bid wasn't accepted.
|
56.998 | Pats raiding the Giants again? | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:03 | 36 |
| Rumor has it the Pats have signed another ex-Giant, a safety. The
Patriots are denying they've signed anyone since the Giant OL.
I wonder if changing the uniforms to blue was Bill's idea.
[email protected] articles by Wed, 23 Feb 94:
--------
Subject: Guyton Signs With Patriots
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 15:10:41 PST
FOXBORO, Mass. (AP) -- Strong safety Myron Guyton became the
second New York Giant to sign with his former coach, agreeing to a
contract Wednesday with Bill Parcells' New England Patriots, a
source said.
Last week, the Patriots made their first free agent move this
winter, signing offensive lineman Bob Kratch.
The source, who declined to be identified, said Guyton, a
five-year veteran, agreed to a three-year deal totaling $5.2
million.
The Patriots denied the report.
``We have not signed anyone today,'' said an official who asked
not to be identified.
The 6-foot-1, 205-pound Guyton was drafted by the Giants out of
Eastern Kentucky in the eighth round in 1989.
Guyton had a solid rookie season with the Giants, taking over
the team's strong safety spot in only the second game of his
career. He ended up leading the team in tackles with 89 and fumble
recoveries with three.
In 1990, he was one of the stalwarts of a defense that carried
the Giants to their second Super Bowl victory in four seasons. He
made 76 tackles and recovered two fumbles.
Guyton started all 16 games in 1991, but missed the first 12 the
next season with a back injury. It required surgery, and he
returned to play well in 1993.
|
56.999 | One of Parcells' personal picks | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:25 | 7 |
|
Guyton is a personal favorite of Parcells'. He fought tooth and nail to
draft him because George Young and crew didn't have Guyton down on their
best available athelete board. Bill wanted him even earlier than the 8th
round. No surprise he's going to the Patriots....
mike
|
56.1000 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:45 | 4 |
|
With the Pats signing an offensive lineman in Kratch, a DB in Guyton.
Plus they are talking to WR Michael Haynes. I see the Patriots draft pick
being Dan "Big Daddy" Wilkinson from Ohio St.
|
56.1001 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | DieOnYourFeet>LiveOnYourKnees | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:14 | 5 |
| For a 25% increase in ticket prices, I would expect the team
to do more than pepper the roster with ex-Midgets. I expect a playoff
team for those prices.
/Don
|
56.1002 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | RIP-PeaceInTheMideast | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:00 | 12 |
| Two days after raising ticket prices we get a story in the Sunday
Globe by Will The Shill telling us what a heroic effort Bob Kraft put forth
in keeping the Patriots here in New England. Will paints him as the Little
Engine That Could overcoming all odds because he didn't want the fans of
New England to be without a team. Now I read where Kraft wants the state to
foot a 60 million dollar renovation of Schaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium
because it will be good for the state. Almost sounds like Kraft has the
Boston Globe in his back pocket and the taxpayers and football fans of
Massachusetts are going to pay and pay for the privilege of having the team
here in Massachusetts. 8^(
/Don
|
56.1003 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:15 | 7 |
| �Now I read where Kraft wants the state to
�foot a 60 million dollar renovation of Schaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium
�because it will be good for the state.
Is this the same guy who a few months ago was talking about all the
renovations to the stadium he was going to pay for out of his own
pocket? I guess the honeymoon is over.
|
56.1004 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:18 | 2 |
| The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales. In fact, this is the
best year ever so far for advance sales.
|
56.1005 | He's getting what he can, apparently... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:37 | 30 |
|
> The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales. In fact, this is the
> best year ever so far for advance sales.
Yep, that's just the market, and there's not much you can do about it
if he can sell all the tickets. Kraft's purchase of the team in itself
has actually increased the demand by giving customers a sense of
security. There has been some disingenuousness about how these
increases have been implemented, though. The "no increases in the last
five years" is indeed true, but only because in *his* first official royal
proclamation Sir Victor Kiam also did the fans a similar "favor" by
increasing prices 33% as a reward for rescuing them from the Sullivans.
The end result is that the majority of tickets have gone from $21 to $35
in the last five years, with the explanation that it's due to ownership
changes-- small consolation. I'll probably still cravenly jump on this
bandwagon, but only for a couple games.
Slash, that McDonough article was certainly a creampuff piece of the
highest order (with his network job, Will is practically an employee of
the NFL, and it continually shows). I think that Bob Kraft is a good
guy and I'm very pleased that he stepped up to the plate and he should
be commended for it, but he's still a businessman first. Some of that
stuff in the article just didn't fly (I was offered $75M, then $100M to
sell my lease, but I just couldn't, remembering what it felt like when
the Braves left town). I still think he might have a real problem
getting any money from the legislature because now that he's actually
signed off on the team, he doesn't have much leverage...
glenn
|
56.1006 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I lift, you grab. ... | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:52 | 10 |
|
>> The price hike hasn't slowed down ticket sales. In fact, this is the
>> best year ever so far for advance sales.
What, they selling 3 a day, versus the normal 2 a week????
(8^)*
JaKe
|
56.1007 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:48 | 3 |
| HA HA Jake. Actually they sold over 5K in one day alone. The previous
record for one day's worth of sales was around 1K and occurred when
Parcells was hired.
|
56.1008 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:56 | 7 |
|
Yup. sold 5900 tickets one day and 1200 the next. Personally,
I don't know whether to buy season tickets or not. On the one
hand I love going to the game what with the atmosphere and all
but the pressure of having to because of the blackout rule will
be pretty much gone because just about every game figures to be
sold out. Decisions decisions.
|
56.1009 | and of course the PRICE | CNTROL::CHILDS | Vadar, the world's greatest Athlete | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:41 | 26 |
|
here Tommy let me help you out with this decision:
bad stuff
1. Metal Benches
2. $10 parking which will probably increase
3. 40 people in a row that was meant to seat 25
4. Drunken fans
5. Lousy Beer
6. December weather
7. $4.00 for a hotdog
8. traffic jams
good Stuff
1. The team
2. the coach
3. the cheerleaders
4. tougher opposistion this year
5. chance to get together with Slasher every week - (might belong
under the BAD)
looks to me like the bad out weights the good.......
mike
|
56.1010 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:45 | 22 |
| > bad stuff
>
> 1. Metal Benches
> 2. $10 parking which will probably increase
> 3. 40 people in a row that was meant to seat 25
> 4. Drunken fans
> 5. Lousy Beer
> 6. December weather
> 7. $4.00 for a hotdog
> 8. traffic jams
>
Mike, don't forget to mention [metal benches] that the beer is expensive,
the parking is lousy [metal benches], they chase you out of the parking
lots way too soon [metal benches], and the mounted State Police are
pretty rude [metal benches].....
hth,
'Saw
|
56.1011 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | RIP-PeaceInTheMideast | Wed Mar 02 1994 16:34 | 5 |
| Personally I can't wait to see what these UsedToOwnCelticsTickets
types just now jumping on this expensive bandwagon will do the first time
it pours, or the first game we get -20� temperatures. Should be fun.
/Don
|
56.1012 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 02 1994 18:17 | 5 |
| >> UsedToOwnCelticsTickets
is the sellout string still intact??
The Crazy Met
|
56.1013 | | KALVIN::MORGAN | | Thu Mar 03 1994 08:37 | 6 |
| �is the sellout string still intact??
Haven't heard otherwise. If it had been snapped it would have been
mentioned everywhere.
Steve
|
56.1014 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 23 1994 08:57 | 16 |
|
>>>> This will probably cut down on 50+ yard field goal attempts....
Zamboni
Yabbut I don't think that will help "Missin" Sisson
either!
;^)
I remain,
thinking nobody's gonna play for a tie anymore
Kev
|
56.1015 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | InBadHandsWithHancock | Wed Mar 23 1994 12:21 | 8 |
| So what exactly has the "savior" Bob Kraft done lately? Raised
ticket prices 25%, hinted that Massachusetts taxpayers should pay
for any Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium renovations, and signed
two free agent ex-Midgets. MeThinks some of these Johnny-Come-Lately
season ticket buyers may be in for a big surprise when the team
starts snapping the pigskin.
/Don
|
56.1016 | I like the changes alot | TNPUBS::ALVEY | The sky's ablaze with ladies' legs | Wed Mar 23 1994 14:34 | 4 |
| Kraft has also pissed his coach off by voting for the
rules changes. Parsells is seething...
dr.a
|
56.1017 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 23 1994 14:58 | 12 |
| yeah, notice how all those coaches who keep the game plan as conservative
and as boring as they can are opposed to these changes. no real surprise.
one coach quoted on ESPN: we'll use it on rare occasions during the
game; but if it is the end of the 4th quarter we'll still kick
the extra point to tie and go into OT.
In some sense the 2 point conversion would really make coaches make a
decision if there was no OT.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1018 | if it piss Reeves off, I'm happy | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean's gone fishin' | Wed Mar 23 1994 15:34 | 5 |
|
the 2 point conversion would make OT obselete except that almighty TV loves
those OT commercial breaks.........
mike
|
56.1019 | Go for the two? My foot | AKOCOA::BREEN | And thy work is crown'd | Wed Mar 23 1994 16:08 | 4 |
| Met,
You have it right on the nose. My recollection is that the afl
coaches hardly ever attempted it - in fact afl having it could have
been a great trivia question.
|
56.1020 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 23 1994 16:11 | 9 |
| why would the 2 point conversion make OT obsolete??
If a team is behind by 8 they go for the 2 pointer and hope to send
the game to OT.
If a team is down by 7 they settle for the PA and go to OT.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1021 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean's gone fishin' | Wed Mar 23 1994 16:41 | 5 |
|
they could get rid of the OT forcing a coach who's behind by 7 to go for
the win or the tie........
mike
|
56.1022 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 23 1994 17:36 | 6 |
| re: .1021
I thought I said that.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1023 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean's gone fishin' | Wed Mar 23 1994 17:47 | 5 |
|
no you stated ways to get to the OT. I'm saying get rid of OT. Make the coach
decide if he wants a win or tie on his record..........
mike
|
56.1024 | 2 pt or 1 | DELNI::FORGET | | Thu Mar 24 1994 07:17 | 9 |
|
It will be interesting to see many times a team does attempt for the
two. I'm sure Coach Parells would of gone for 2 instead of Sisson
kicking. Does anyone off hand know when regular tickets go on sale?
I'd like to get tickets to see the Raiders.
Mike
|
56.1025 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 29 1994 13:49 | 5 |
| What the heck is Parcells up to now? Someone in the Patriots notesfile
is saying the Pats have given offer sheets to Tillman (Giants) and
Blair Thomas (Jets). They've got a guy in the backfield already who is
good for 1000 yards a year. Why are they jerking him around? Probably
because he did something to tick off Bill.
|
56.1026 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valor | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:08 | 20 |
| > What the heck is Parcells up to now? Someone in the Patriots notesfile
> is saying the Pats have given offer sheets to Tillman (Giants) and
> Blair Thomas (Jets). They've got a guy in the backfield already who is
> good for 1000 yards a year. Why are they jerking him around? Probably
> because he did something to tick off Bill.
No. It's not unusual for a Parcells team to be RB heavy. When they had
Joe Morris they traded for OJ Anderson. When they had Rodney Hampton
they drafted Tillman.
I think the reasoning is that RBs get hurt a lot, and that you want to
have another potential 1000 yd man ready to step in.
I don't know about Blair Thomas, but Tillman is good, and Tillman is used
to being a backup. In fact, he's really good at that.....
'Saw
|
56.1027 | could be a setup in the new world of salary caps | FRETZ::HEISER | Shoveling that sunshine | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:39 | 2 |
| or maybe he wants to limit the free money the NY teams have left and
go after another one of their players.
|
56.1028 | If Tilmon signs, Russell is gone... | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Wed Mar 30 1994 06:39 | 6 |
| I don't believe that Russell will be staying if they get Tilmon. That's
a lot of $$$ for a RB. Russell is asking for a lot of $$$ too...If just
Blair Thomas signs (reported $550,000) and not Tilmon then you could
keep Russell...
stig
|
56.1029 | | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Wed Mar 30 1994 06:41 | 3 |
| unless of course, Russell takes less $$$...
stig
|
56.1030 | looking good... | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Thu Mar 31 1994 06:25 | 3 |
| well, the pats signed blair thomas...
stig
|
56.1031 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Anybody But Arkansas! | Thu Mar 31 1994 13:32 | 3 |
| Blair Thomas! Gawd! Somewhere JoJ is celebrating. 8^(
/Don
|
56.1032 | Jets parade in September | OURGNG::RIGGEN | How to parlay 1K into 100K by Hillary R. | Thu Mar 31 1994 13:33 | 1 |
| Congrats from the Jets
|
56.1033 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Mon Apr 04 1994 07:06 | 6 |
| There was a note on Russell in Sunday's Globe from an unnamed GM in the
NFL, who supposedly said that Russell isn't a "finisher". That he
often doesn't finish off a play and thereby misses out on getting a bit
more yardage each play. Interesting, if true.
Lee
|
56.1034 | | KALVIN::MORGAN | | Mon Apr 04 1994 08:28 | 9 |
| There are rumors of possible deals being made with Cincy to grab the
first pick in the draft. One possibility is N.E. trading Marv Cook
and swapping places with the Bengals.
Supposedly, Marshall Faulk had an outstanding workout for the scouts.
Speed, speed, speed. I would think that N.E. would take Wilkinson if
this deal goes through.
Steve
|
56.1035 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | breakin' rocks, in the hot sun | Mon Apr 04 1994 09:17 | 14 |
|
the paper I read said that Cook and the 1 st pick ain't going to do it.
Bengals are happy with Magee at TE. Bengals like Faulk so would be willing
to trade with somebody if they can stay in the top 4 picks and still have
a chace at him. It was suggested by the writer that the Pats might be
willing to give up Chung and the pick. Can't remember who supposed to
challenge Chung this year, but the writer felt he had a good chance of
unseating Chung and Chung huge salary makes this a very likely occurances.
Wish he Giants would make a move for Wilkerson. Not a combine freak but
supposedly "Big Daddy" ran 4.7 40 at the combines. Alls I know is he
reminds of Reggie White and that's good enough for me........
mike
|
56.1036 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 04 1994 09:48 | 7 |
| I'm surprised at those comments about Russell. To me it looks like
he's always dragging tacklers for the extra yard.
Harlow and Coates have been signed to new contracts. The T&G said
Russell is a free agent. I didn't think he was. Maybe the Pats were
worried about losing him to another team and thus the interest in Blair
Thomas and that Jint RB.
|
56.1037 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Apr 04 1994 13:04 | 11 |
|
I heard it was going to be Marv Cook and a draft choice to swap
picks. Also that Cincy wanted Cook because Magee can't catch half as good
as Cook, So Magee was expendable. If the Pat's move up in the draft then
they want either Wilkinson or Faulk. Marshall ran a 4.33 40, giving the
scouts a Barry Sanders type workout. So the Pats have to be careful about
other teams jumping into the 1, 2, or 3 slots to get Faulk. If the Pat's
don't move up, then they have Adams, or Langeham, or that LB from Alcorn St
in there minds the whole time.
Ron
|
56.1038 | This cinci-cook sway thing makes no sense to me | AKOCOA::BREEN | Till Time Shall be no More | Mon Apr 04 1994 13:13 | 14 |
| I haven't been able to figure this out. Cinci seems to be saying to
pats that they don't need Wilkinson so they'll ensure pats can draft
him for cook (+).
But then pats can choose Faulk if they prefer.
Why don't pats just take the one left over. Both are excellent picks.
Cook is throwaway for pats but should be worth something. It sounds
like cinci should be the ones paying pats for cook. They're not really
giving up anything since they have no preference between 3rd and 4th
pick.
Bill
|
56.1039 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Apr 04 1994 15:40 | 8 |
|
The problem is that Faulk had such an outstanding workout. That
with only Washington and Indy needing QB's. Both can make a trade to
move down and still get there QB. So the Pats have to watch out for someone
jumping into the 2/3 spot. If Cincy takes Wilkinson, someone jumps up and
grabs Faulk. The Pats don't get either one of them.
Ron
|
56.1040 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Mon Apr 04 1994 15:48 | 6 |
| I don't get it - the Pats pick fourth, right?
1. Cinci - Wilkerson or Faulk
2. Washington - Schuler
3. Indy - other QB
4. Pats - Wilkerson or Faulk
|
56.1041 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Apr 04 1994 15:57 | 13 |
|
I think .1039 pretty much sums it up. It's almost a given that
Washington will take Shuler and Indy will take Trent Dilford but
Indy may not be able to pass up Marshall Faulk or they could drop
down to 5 or 6 or even lower and still get their QB. That's what
has to scare the Pats *IF* Faulk is their man. Personally, I still
think Big Daddy is the pick of the draft and the man that the Pats
really covet. Any moves that the Pats make will probably be geared
towards landing Big Daddy. The reported trade is Cook, Chung and the
number one for Cincy's number one. Cook has been a marked man ever
since Parcells came aboard. Chung may have been made expendable when
they signed Kratch and Parcells likes Todd Rucci also. The Pats could
move up and yet give up almost nothing.
|
56.1042 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Mon Apr 04 1994 16:02 | 4 |
| Hate to see Chung go - good o-linemen are scarce. I wouldn't call Chung good,
but I think he will be soon.
=Bob=
|
56.1043 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Apr 04 1994 16:31 | 11 |
|
I'd hate to see Chung go myself. The kid has improved leaps and
bounds since he was drafted and that's due largely to the fact that
the kid is smart. He learns quickly and he executes what he's learned.
Unfortunately, a shot at a Wilkerson or a Faulk makes someone like
Chung expendable. But it's still impossible to tell what Parcells
and the rest of the Pats draft people are really planning. Chung may
not figure in at all. Last year, there was all kinds of speculation
about what the Pats would do and all along they wanted Bledsoe. One
thing Parcells doesn't do is run his team through the newspapers so
hopefully all of this idle specualtion is just that.
|
56.1044 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Burn the Tiger road pajamas! | Mon Apr 04 1994 22:07 | 3 |
| Lee, we missed ya at Fenway today... see my p-name about the new
uniforms...
|
56.1045 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Wed Apr 06 1994 08:05 | 12 |
| I agree, Walt. When I put the game on after getting home, I thought I
was watching the Indians, or the Angels. I don't care for the uniforms
at all. Of course, there aren't any uniforms in the record book for
RBI's or ERA, so it's strictly esthetics.
Tough loss for the Tigers, but I don't think it'll be the last game
they lose when scoring 8 runs. Unfortunately for the Sox, it may be
one of the few they will win after giving up 8 runs.
I'm sure glad baseball is back. I love this game.
Lee
|
56.1046 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Sylvia > Dean | Wed Apr 06 1994 08:55 | 32 |
| As I said in .1031...
From: AXIS::US4RMC::"[email protected]" "James Wardle" 5-APR-1994 18:26:45.26
To: "'smtp:[email protected]'" <axis::robichaud>
CC:
Subj: Blair Thomas
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!
I CAIN'T BELIEVE IT....THE PATS ARE PAYING HIM HOW MUCH??????? He's a big
scorer....6 TD's in 4 years...
And he makes Freeman McNeil look like a healthy player...
Did Parcells get hit in the haid or something?
Hawwwwwwww, you can have him. Good riddance. I can't wait until he comes to
NY to play....Lageman is gonna
bust him in half.
JoJ
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: from inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com by us4rmc.pko.dec.com (5.65/rmc-22feb94) id AA15880; Tue, 5 Apr 94 18:32:24 -040
% Received: from igw.merck.com by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com (5.65/21Mar94) id AA11031; Tue, 5 Apr 94 15:29:11 -070
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Received: by igw.merck.com with rsmtp; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:33:05 EDT
% From: [email protected] (James Wardle)
% To: "'smtp:[email protected]'" <axis::robichaud>
% Subject: Blair Thomas
% Date: Tue, 05 Apr 94 18:29:00 EDT
|
56.1047 | | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Wed Apr 06 1994 10:23 | 5 |
| > Lageman is gonna bust him in half???
thats if he gets to him...whats NY gonna do this year???
|
56.1048 | hate to ask but.... | NWD002::JOLMAMA | Cum Grano Salis | Mon Apr 18 1994 16:29 | 5 |
| Where is the baseball notes file.
Been gone for a long time.
Matt the Mariner
|
56.1049 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon Apr 18 1994 16:49 | 2 |
| Mock draft here on KGME has the Pats taking Sam Adams (DL) or Shelby Hill
(WR).
|
56.1050 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Apr 19 1994 09:51 | 14 |
|
Yabbut Matt,
Ordinarily, MtM would tell you to take a lookie lookie at note 4 but
since I'm a nice guy, I'll let ya in on a secret.......
I'm it's present landlord so try CSTEAM::Baseball!
hth
I remain,
not getting any rent :^(
Kev
|
56.1051 | good move by the Pats | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:46 | 2 |
| Chargers just unloaded some salary by sending Marion Butts to the Pats
for a 3rd and 5th round pick.
|
56.1052 | russell will probably be gone | CSLALL::BRULE | IT'S SPRINGTIME | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:05 | 5 |
| Pats also received Chargers #3. What it boiled down to was the Pats
moving down 6 positions in the third round and giving a 5th round pick
for Butts.
Mike
|
56.1053 | | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Tue Apr 26 1994 07:33 | 1 |
| what a steal!!! I can't wait til next year or this year...
|
56.1054 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Apr 26 1994 11:14 | 6 |
| Good move for the Pats.
How does their O-line look this year? Will Bledsoe continue to be
Bloodsow?
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
56.1055 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Apr 26 1994 11:25 | 10 |
|
>> How does their O-line look this year? Will Bledsoe continue to be
>> Bloodsow?
That Pats o-line was called one of the five best in the NFL last year
and was the strongest part of the team. That was before they added Bob
Kratch who came over from the Giants. With Harlow and Chung having a-
nother year under their belts, the unit will only be stronger. The main
weaknesses were the wideouts, the total lack of a pass rush and the
spotty place kicking.
|
56.1056 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue Apr 26 1994 11:54 | 8 |
| re: o-line
It appears that Chung's position is in jepardy. Kratch is slated to start at
left guard, which makes Chung expendable. Personally, I hope that they keep
him. He has the tools to be a good o-lineman. He improved dramatically lasted
year, and the only thing I think he needs to work on is his toughness.
=Bob=
|
56.1057 | Offensive line is a strength | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - 1995 NCAA Champs! | Tue Apr 26 1994 12:11 | 5 |
| But the guy who started at the other guard lasted year (Baldinger)
got cut. They do have 1993's #2 draft choice Todd Rucci coming back
from injury, and he and Chung should compete for the other guard spot.
NAZZ
|
56.1058 | | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Tue Apr 26 1994 12:14 | 7 |
| re "spotty place kicking"
Tommy, I think you're being too kind.
billl
|
56.1059 | fillinthe blanks sh***y | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Tue Apr 26 1994 13:35 | 3 |
| how bout' "shoddy" place kickin'...
stig
|
56.1060 | Typo | WREATH::SCOPA | | Fri Apr 29 1994 14:53 | 4 |
| Change the "o" to "i" and the "dd" to "tt" and then you'll be
reportin' factual data.
Maj
|
56.1061 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Go Broons�! | Fri Apr 29 1994 15:09 | 4 |
| Three back to back home games this year. Going to make for
three back to back hurting Mondays. 8^o
/Don
|
56.1062 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 29 1994 15:22 | 2 |
| Open the season at Miami and close it at Buffalo and Chicago. I guess
the schedulers aren't meteorologists.
|
56.1063 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Apr 29 1994 15:25 | 6 |
|
> Open the season at Miami and close it at Buffalo and Chicago. I guess
> the schedulers aren't meteorologists.
But why give the warm weather and domed teams the advantage of
finishing the season at home?
|
56.1064 | wimps | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Fri Apr 29 1994 17:06 | 3 |
| They never let Phoenix open at home for the first 2 weeks since we've
had a team. This year is the first year we have a home game in week 2
and it's a night game on TNT.
|
56.1065 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu May 05 1994 15:32 | 4 |
| Iffin' anyones coming to Cincy to watch the Pats this summer, give me
a ring.
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
56.1066 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Go Broons�! | Thu May 05 1994 15:47 | 1 |
| Thanks Chip, but I'll watch them here in Foxboro...
|
56.1067 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu May 05 1994 16:47 | 5 |
| Hey... I awwwready got two mebbes...
(And I'll cheer against the Bengals with the best offum.)
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
56.1068 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu May 05 1994 16:50 | 4 |
| | Hey... I awwwready got two mebbes...
Unfortunately my project with GEAE will be long done by then, but maybe I can
swing a special trip for "follow up".
|
56.1069 | | MKFSA::LONG | Two score ain't so bad | Thu May 12 1994 13:54 | 6 |
| Heard on the news this a.m. that Andre Tippet was having a news
conference this afternoon. Speculation was that he was going to
retire. Any word from the 'Peoples Republic'?
billl
|
56.1070 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Thu May 12 1994 14:03 | 10 |
|
There's an article in the Globe to that effect, billl. He's really
lost a step or more and wouldn't have started last year on most teams.
In his prime he was an exciting player in one of the best linebacker
cores around with Steve Nelson, Don Blackmon and Johnny Rhembert but
he's at the end of his string much like Mecklenburg. This is another
example of the unfairness of the cap because a guy like Tip, who has
spent his whole career here and been loyal and fairly active in the
community, deserves a better sendoff than, "Sorry, we have x number of
dollars to spend and you ain't worth it. See ya, Oldtimer."
|
56.1071 | | MKFSA::LONG | Two score ain't so bad | Thu May 12 1994 14:08 | 12 |
| I count Tippet among the most exciting linebackers I've had the
chance to see play. He's right up there with Lambert, Hamm and
Singletary IMHO.
As far as the older players moving on to make room for the younger
ones goes, I'd much rather have it this way than to see the NFL
adopt some bogus thing like the the DH, that MLB uses to keep
has-beens around an extra coulpe of years.
billl
|
56.1072 | Da poop on Tippett | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu May 12 1994 14:28 | 6 |
| Tippett is retiring and moving into the Pats front office. He will be Director
of Player Development, and apparently will focus on preparing players for life
after football. Maybe a made-up job, but sounds like a worthwhile endevor,
considerign the average NFL career is something like 3 years.
=Bob=
|
56.1073 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 12 1994 14:36 | 11 |
| >after football. Maybe a made-up job, but sounds like a worthwhile endevor,
>considerign the average NFL career is something like 3 years.
Not made up. I know that there are portions of the Players "union" or
association or whatever their called that have lobbied heavily for these
programs or positions...
Sounds like it might be a good thing....
'Saw
|
56.1074 | | MKFSA::LONG | Two score ain't so bad | Thu May 12 1994 16:04 | 5 |
| Sounds like something I should check into here as a carrer change.
billl
|
56.1075 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 12 1994 16:27 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 56.1074 by MKFSA::LONG "Two score ain't so bad" >>>
I scored twice in one night -- got a little sore, but you're right,
it wasn't so bad....
> Sounds like something I should check into here as a carrer change.
You could become the Curator for the Former DEC Employees Wax Museum....
|
56.1076 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 13 1994 10:21 | 3 |
| The Pats' last link with the Super Bowl team of 1985 is gone. After 12
years and 5 Pro Bowl appearances, Andre Tippett has decided to hang 'em
up. He has taken a front office position with the club.
|
56.1077 | Enjoy Tip | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Fri May 13 1994 12:43 | 6 |
| re-1
He waas the one Patsy that I liked to watch. Saw him at pile hi a
few years back, and his style/intensity was great!
Tim
|
56.1078 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue May 17 1994 15:14 | 3 |
| Marv Cook? What's the buzz? Good signing be the Bears?
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
56.1079 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 17 1994 15:22 | 4 |
| Cook is a former Pro Bowler who didn't fit into Parcell's system. He
has great hands, but apparently Bill questioned his size and blocking
ability (why, I really don't know). IMO, a very good pickup by the
Bears.
|
56.1080 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue May 17 1994 15:26 | 12 |
| Yea, what Mac said. Cook put up some impressive receiving numbers for a couple
of years on dreadful teams. He signed a big contract, which made him a burden
to carry under the salary cap.
Good hands, good speed for a TE, good long snapper on kicks, average to fair
blocker.
Good pickup for a pass-oriented offense
=Bob=
BTW - why did da Bears cut Peter Tom Willis?
|
56.1081 | | MKFSA::LONG | M-O-O-N spells layoff. Laws yes! | Tue May 17 1994 15:33 | 5 |
| With all the ex=Steelers and ex-Patriots on the Bears this year
I could be swayed into calling them my favorite NFC team.
billl
|
56.1082 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue May 17 1994 15:43 | 17 |
| They cut PT Willis (as of the last BEAR REPORT) because they couldn't
trade him and didn't think he had the makings for a pro Q.B. In all
honesty he didn't do much when he had the chance and he was less mobile
than Harbough. When they picked up Steve Walsh, they dumped P.T.
They feel much better about Shane Matthews as a potential pro Q.B.
because of his size. (Well, height anyways)
They didn't want to go into camp with four Q.B.s this year, I think it
is a good move as it lets the guys concentrate on the season, not
making the cut.
The have Eric Kramer, Steve Walsh, and Shane Matthews for their Q.B.
It looks like Eric has many decent targets this year.
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
56.1083 | Go Blue! | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Tue May 17 1994 15:53 | 5 |
| Bill,
Root for the Giants! Think of them as future Patriots!
Mike
|
56.1084 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 17 1994 16:06 | 3 |
| I forgot about the long snapper part. Those guys are tough to find.
That's why Trevor Matich is still in the NFL. I wonder who the Pats
are going to use now that Cook is gone.
|
56.1085 | Could be wrong though | MAYES::MAILLOUX | | Tue May 17 1994 16:10 | 3 |
|
I think they picked up DeOssie for that reason!!!
|
56.1086 | Simms.... | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:09 | 6 |
|
Wonder if Parcells will bring another one of his boys to New England??
I think Simms would be great for Beldsoe. The guy could teach him a
few things......
|
56.1087 | The Pats | LEDS::AWILLIAMS | | Mon Jun 27 1994 14:33 | 12 |
| Gentlemen:
As you are all well aware, Bill Parcells is now the head coach of the
Patriots. I must say that after last season's 5-11 record that things
are going in the right direction. This team could have easily gone
11-5, due to the fact that they lost most of their games by only 3-4
points. Watch out for the Pats this year. I really believe that they
are going to surprise a lot of people, and in 2-3 years be in the same
caliber of the Dallases and 49ers of the world. They had an excellent
draft, and look real sharp. If you remember how coach Parcells took the
Giants in '79, and made them into contenders in just 3 years. They also
won 2 Super Bowls. So be patient, and enjoy the Patriots as they
rebuild themselves into a powerhouse team.
|
56.1088 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Mon Jun 27 1994 14:54 | 10 |
| Anything over an 8-8 or 7-9 record would be gravy. They still
have no quality receivers and this year they do not play a last
place schedule. Things are getting better but expecting 11 wins
or more is unrealistic. I heard that the Foxboro lots were charging
$20.00 to park for the soccer games. Could this be a preview of
things to come? Kraft's white knight image would get some tarnish
if he follows up a 25% increase in ticket prices with a 100% increase
in parking fees.
/Don
|
56.1089 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Mon Jun 27 1994 16:39 | 4 |
| Does Kraft own the lots? I thought Eddie Anvilhead et al owned
them.
Mike
|
56.1090 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jun 27 1994 16:48 | 11 |
|
Some of the lots are owned by the Kraft, Andelman owns several
and still others are owned by other "entrepreneurs".
If I had a guess, I'd say that they're just gouging the soccer
fans. Most of these folks have never been to Foxboro, don't know
they're getting taken and are so excited about the Cup that they
don't really care. When you consider the cost of a Cup ticket and
what they're charging for merchandise/concessions, $20 to park is
a drop in the bucket. Of course, if Pats season roll around and they
still try and get $20, you'll see a mini-revolt.
|
56.1091 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 27 1994 16:56 | 12 |
| Yes, I'd bet that the prices for the World Cup are simply because of the
World Cup.
I mean, the cheap seats were going for $25, and our seats went for $45.
The seats we had last year for England-USA were not cloes to $45 if I
remember right and we were about 8 rows from the field. We payed $10
to park last year.
I think it's just for the soccer....
|
56.1092 | Everyone's in on the gouging act for the Cup... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Clemens' stats = Huge Strikezone | Mon Jun 27 1994 16:59 | 9 |
|
> I mean, the cheap seats were going for $25, and our seats went for $45.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The Nigerian government was getting considerably more, though... ;-)
glenn
|
56.1093 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 27 1994 17:11 | 6 |
| >
> The Nigerian government was getting considerably more, though... ;-)
>
True, but you did get to sit next to two babes......8^)
|
56.1094 | Let's not be rude (I wasn't) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Clemens' stats = Huge Strikezone | Mon Jun 27 1994 17:18 | 5 |
|
> True, but you did get to sit next to two babes......8^)
Bebetos is the preferred term...
|
56.1095 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:09 | 10 |
| | Bebetos is the preferred term...
Bebeto, Bebeto, Bebeto......�gooooooooool! �goooooooool! �gooooooooolllll!
Tres a zero!
|
56.1096 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:13 | 8 |
|
Please don't sully the Pats note with that corny soccer lingo.
For folks that think that that clown who does that "Goooolll!"
thing on Univsion is entertaining, consider that he's not act-
ually at the game but in a studio in Miami watching the game on
a monitor. All of the excitement that he expresses is fake. But
then again, given that the game is soccer any excitement would
*have* to be fake.
|
56.1097 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:21 | 8 |
| > a monitor. All of the excitement that he expresses is fake. But
> then again, given that the game is soccer any excitement would
> *have* to be fake.
But you also have to realize that the audience he's catering to gets
excited at the tiniest little thing.....
|
56.1098 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:46 | 16 |
|
>> "....gets excited at the tiniest little thing...."
KEEP HIM AWAY FROM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;^)
|
56.1099 | Abbreviated in honor of MtFM | SOLANA::MAY_BR | one bourbon,one scotch, and one beer | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:49 | 5 |
| >> "....gets excited at the tiniest little thing...."
Like a soccer players' P.A.?
BOSS
|
56.1100 | ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jun 28 1994 15:12 | 2 |
|
Yabbut wahts'sa P.A.???
|
56.1101 | No if's an's or Butts! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 26 1994 10:27 | 12 |
|
Yabbut I heard on the radion that newly acquired Marion Butts
has to go under the knife. I thought that they said he tore some
cartilege.
Has a jinx started?
I remain,
wondering if they'll win 10 games thisted year?
Kev
|
56.1102 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jul 26 1994 15:41 | 4 |
| I like Bill Parcells for what he's achieved as a coach, and for bringing
two NFL championships to the Giants, BUTT, it would bring a smile to my
face to see his cocky/arrogant approach to Leonard Russell wiped away
if he had to meet him on level ground if Butts' injury is serious.
|
56.1103 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | TV Nation Roolz... | Thu Jul 28 1994 13:51 | 5 |
| The first five home games have been sold out! I don't think
the Patriot's bandwagon is strong enough to hold this kind of weight.
I wonder if concession prices will skyrocket?
/Don
|
56.1104 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983 | Thu Jul 28 1994 23:27 | 7 |
|
> I wonder if concession prices will skyrocket?
Well tickets have. Parking is rumored to go up at least 50%. Might
as well hike up the watered down brews too.
- Sean_not_always_this_sarcastic
|
56.1105 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Aug 29 1994 14:02 | 30 |
|
Hopefully the loss to Green Bay will temper some of the
Pats in the Super Bowl talk. Yes, it was nice that they
were once 3-0 but the scores of pre-season games are all
but meaningless. What's important is whether or not the
team is moving forward and the Pats appear to be doing that.
Moving forward would be to a 7-9 or 8-8 season. A 9-7 or
10-6 would be pretty close to a miracle. After Bledsoe's
performance against a tough Green Bay defense, "miracle"
might not be strong enough. A few predictions for the
season:
o Pats don't make playoffs but do manage to beat Buffalo
at least once.
o Playing for Parcells gives Vincent Brown credibility and
he gets the Pro Bowl invite that has long been overdue.
o Marion Butts rushes for over 1000 yards.
o Michael Timpson drops one too many passes and gets his
walking papers.
o Chris Slade gets at least 10 sacks and overshadows first
round pick Willie McGinest.
o Ben Coates along with Bruce Armstrong, Pat Harlow and Vincent
Brown give that Pats four Pro Bowlers.
|
56.1106 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | Football > Baseball | Mon Aug 29 1994 16:20 | 6 |
| Heard over the weekend that the Jests game sold out and there
are only a little over 5,000 tickets for the last game of the season
against the Colts. I agree with Tommy that the Pats will win between
7 to 9 games depending on breaks, injuries etc.
/Don
|
56.1107 | | METSNY::francus | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Mon Aug 29 1994 16:29 | 4 |
| 9 wins could be enough for a wild-card spot.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1108 | | MKFSA::LONG | It ain't over til it's over, maybe | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:15 | 11 |
| Does anyone know for sure what station the Miami game will be
on Sunday? Please say it isn't FOX.
I'm going into panicsville since THE game is also on at 4 and
is scheduled to be carried by FOX.
I'll be camping for the weekend, but plan on spending Sunday
afternoon glued to a tv somewhere in the hills of Vermont.
billl
|
56.1109 | go | COMET::MARLAND | | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:17 | 1 |
| Your safe, it's on NBC.
|
56.1110 | | HANNAH::ASHE | If you want to wreck my sweater... | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:18 | 3 |
| NE-Miami... hmmm, AFC game, and FOX does NFC... I'll go out on a limb
and guess it's on NBC, billl...
|
56.1111 | | MKFSA::LONG | It ain't over til it's over, maybe | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:24 | 10 |
| >> NE-Miami... hmmm, AFC game, and FOX does NFC... I'll go out on a limb
>> and guess it's on NBC, billl...
Way cool!
Speaking of going out on a limb, Walt(e), what was the answer
you got last Thursday?
billl
|
56.1112 | Going solo to see the Stones... | HANNAH::ASHE | If you want to wreck my sweater... | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:32 | 2 |
| I didn't get a clear answer, but I think I hear opportunity knocking...
A&W's is next Wednesday, right?
|
56.1113 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Aug 31 1994 13:24 | 3 |
| The Stones are playing in a Cactus League stadium 6 miles from my
house. I think I'll call the cops that night and have them arrested
for disturbing the peace.
|
56.1114 | | HANNAH::ASHE | If you want to wreck my sweater... | Wed Aug 31 1994 13:26 | 1 |
| I mean, she's going solo to the Stones...
|
56.1115 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | Football > Baseball | Wed Aug 31 1994 17:54 | 5 |
| So has Bledsoe been released from the hospital yet? Maybe he
watched Friday night's game film. That would be enough to make
me sick to my stomach.
/Don
|
56.1116 | | MKFSA::LONG | It ain't over til it's over, maybe | Thu Sep 01 1994 09:47 | 8 |
| I heard he was released sometime yesterday. What a baby! If any
of us have a stomach ache we take some Pepto-bismal and tough it
out.
Then again none of us are worth a couple million bucks either.
billl
|
56.1117 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Sep 06 1994 14:00 | 6 |
| Hey Tommy Brydie! Still think Irving Fryar is an overrated
stiff? If New England had him instead of Todd Rucci Sunday they
would've won the game. Hope that 5.5 million dollar secondary can
come around by 13:00 this Sunday.
/Don
|
56.1118 | As a freshman against Miami, could see the greatness... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 06 1994 14:27 | 11 |
|
> Hey Tommy Brydie! Still think Irving Fryar is an overrated
> stiff?
And how about Marshall Faulk? If the Patriots hadn't gone and
messed up by winning those last two meaningless games at the end of
last year, they'd have my dream backfield of Bledsoe/Faulk, and
wouldn't _any_ defense, as opposed to very little... ;-)
glenn
|
56.1119 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 06 1994 15:54 | 19 |
| > And how about Marshall Faulk? If the Patriots hadn't gone and
> messed up by winning those last two meaningless games at the end of
> last year, they'd have my dream backfield of Bledsoe/Faulk, and
> wouldn't _any_ defense, as opposed to very little... ;-)
They were just talking about the Fins-Pats game on WFAN.
Francesa said that Marino watches for the weak side single coverage and
every time he gets it he goes for it. I guess that's what he did with
Friar.
However, the question that's begging to be asked is this:
Would Fryar, playing with the Pats, be as good receiving
from Bledsoe as he is receiving from Marino?
'Saw
|
56.1120 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound-world | Tue Sep 06 1994 16:53 | 5 |
|
and the answer is yes. He'd still have stone for hands and be absolutely
brillant one week and a stiff the next 4............
mike
|
56.1121 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Sep 06 1994 17:13 | 5 |
| Hey Mike, what do you know. You predicted a Steeler victory
over the Cowboys! The trading of IRVING FRYAR was a HUGE Parcells
mistake.
/Don
|
56.1122 | Fryar's a bozo | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound-world | Wed Sep 07 1994 09:24 | 5 |
|
yeah but my KOD has almost put me in the Pantheon of KOD's where YOU, Dinz
and the Chief dwell........
;^)
|
56.1124 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 07 1994 10:25 | 14 |
| Leaving the tarp up was no worse than the infamous snow blower incident.
Football is supposed to be played in all sorts of weather including mud. If
the Patriots want to be contenders they have to learn to adjust to various
weather and field conditions.
And while the mud may have been an excuse for no pass rush it was no excuse
for leaving Fryar open as much as they did. He ran where he wanted when he
wanted and the Pats secondary never had any idea where he was.
Marino is great but he's not that great, the Pats have some tuning to do on
defense.
George
|
56.1125 | Parcells should stick to coaching and get some front office help | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:13 | 11 |
| It is obvious to me that Parcells, while definitely a great coach, is
less than spectacular as a general manager. The Fryar trade was a
joke. ALl he got for him was a third round pick that he cut and a
second round OL who wasn't even activated Sunday.
Speaking of the draft, Parcell's 1994 draft might go down as the worst
in New England history, which is really saying something. If McGinnest
doesn't improve, he'll have nothing to showe for the first four rounds
of the draft.
NAZZ
|
56.1126 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:23 | 7 |
| Did Parcells have anything to do with building the Giant team that won the
Superbowl or did they have some other GM that built that team for him?
Does the new Pats owner know anything about football or is he mainly a
business man?
George
|
56.1127 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:38 | 14 |
| >
> Did Parcells have anything to do with building the Giant team that won the
>Superbowl or did they have some other GM that built that team for him?
>
The Giants GM was/is George Young. Supposedly they worked together, but
I'm sure there was some friction there.
The Giants had some fine draft picks during those years, and some clunkers.
I personally don't think that Young is that great a GM.
'Saw
|
56.1128 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound-world | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:38 | 6 |
|
one of the reasons why Parcells left the Giants (other than a big head) is
that he had little say in the draft. George Young and Tom Boisture handle
the Giants draft board........
|
56.1129 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:45 | 16 |
| >> Speaking of the draft, Parcell's 1994 draft might go down as the worst
>> in New England history, which is really saying something. If McGinnest
>> doesn't improve, he'll have nothing to showe for the first four rounds
>> of the draft.
A bit of an overstatement given that second round pick Kevin Lee is
out for the year with a broken jaw and the seventh round pick actually
started Sunday. And given some of the drafts that Steinberg engineered,
Parcells could've used a Ouija board and still not have had the "worst
draft in Patriots history". Let's not forget that Parcells almost
completely cleaned house when he came aboard and most of the players
that he let go did not catch on anywhere because they flat out
couldn't play football. At least Bill cuts 'em loose rather than
throw good money after bad. McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene
Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
|
56.1130 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:45 | 16 |
| > one of the reasons why Parcells left the Giants (other than a big head) is
> that he had little say in the draft. George Young and Tom Boisture handle
> the Giants draft board........
Well, he did have those heart problems too. Is he still smoking?
At any rate, though, you're correct there Mike. And ol' Fat George ain't
that great a GM IMHO....
'Saw
|
56.1131 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Wed Sep 07 1994 11:52 | 12 |
| I'd put forth the premise that the Parcells reign in New England is starting
out in a similar fashion to his reign in New York.
There were some seasons there where the Giants usually lost by 6 points or
less -- they were usually in games until the very end. A couple of us
were talking Sunday about how the Pats are close to that point right now.
Anyway, they seem to be doing okay, and better than they used to be doing....
'Saw
|
56.1132 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 07 1994 12:29 | 18 |
| The mistakes they were making were stupid mistakes which is actually a good
sign. Those types of things can be fixed. They seemed to be getting mixed up in
their coverage leaving guys wide open down field which you can't do against a
guy like Marino.
Also they had a couple bad calls go against them. There was one time when a
Patriot corner back hardly touched his guy but got called on a critical down for
pass interference then a few minutes later a Dalphin was all over the Patriot
receiver but it was called incidental something or other.
They're not a championship team yet but at least they should win some games
and create some excitement. And with a little luck the days of sleeze are
finally over. Hopefully there will be no more GM's fighting with linebackers
questionable employment practices, locker room assaults, money shifted to
rock concerts and the like. These guys actually seem interested in playing
and winning football games.
George
|
56.1133 | Call me paranoic... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 07 1994 12:34 | 39 |
|
> McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
> talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene
> Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
On the other hand, he'd better be. McGinest is a #4 pick. I believe
Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
these guys even lower. Some of the expectations coming out of that
train-wreck first half to last season was that Pats would be able to
continue the talent building process with another excellent draft
behind 1993's. It's too early to say that that hasn't happened, but
lost in the recent Patriots Euphoria, I think it's also fair to say
that outlook isn't quite as good as when we were all pretty confident
that a Wilkinson/Faulk/Stokes/Wheatley was headed our way as a payback
for the misery of those first 11 games. It would be just the Patriots'
luck, due to a number of circumstances not the least of which was the
decision of some of the best talent to stay in school, to see the
opportunity lost due to a major talent dropoff from 1-2-3 picks to
the number 4.
As for Young/Parcells/whomever's GM work in New York, consider that
more so than with any other multiple-Super Bowl winner in recent
history, those championships were made possible due to the individual
talents of a single player: Lawrence Taylor. Not taking anything away
from the other players, or Parcells' coaching (which was the other
primary ingredient), but you just didn't have the talent stockpile that
you had on some other great teams. Whatever Parcells' involvement,
I agree that there was not a tremendous draft record there that Pats'
fans should draw too much confidence from. Coaching is the man's
brilliance...
I've changed my mind on the Fryar thing and will admit defeat. I don't
really care that he's not here, but it's another thing to get beat by
the guy for the second time now. Just this one loss was worth the
picks...
glenn
|
56.1134 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Wed Sep 07 1994 12:55 | 40 |
| > history, those championships were made possible due to the individual
> talents of a single player: Lawrence Taylor. Not taking anything away
> from the other players, or Parcells' coaching (which was the other
> primary ingredient), but you just didn't have the talent stockpile that
> you had on some other great teams. Whatever Parcells' involvement,
> I agree that there was not a tremendous draft record there that Pats'
> fans should draw too much confidence from. Coaching is the man's
> brilliance...
To a certain extent, yes.
But let's analyze it a bit more. LT did make things happen on defense.
One of the round table guys on ESPN's Monday Night Prime said that the
only defensive player he'd ever call an impact player was LT. No doubt.
But consider also that the Giants offensive line was one of the best around
at the time too -- and it was two different lines that won rings, for the
most part.
The running backs were solid -- not superstars (sorry Mike C, not even Joe
Morris), but solid, high quality RBs.
Despite what folks think about Phil Simms, he did the job, did it extremely
well, was a leader on and off the field, and managed to have the 3rd best
passing day ever in the SB in 1987....
There were others in the cast besides LT. The Giants draft philosophy, which
I have ALWAYS disagreed with, was to always draft the best athlete, regardless
of position. I think lately that has come to bite them in the ass.
Parcells best talent, I agree, is coaching -- the ability to mold solid players
into champions. He's not flashy, he's not going to give you exciting aerial
dynamic football, but if it's a ring you want, I'm sure he can bring it to you.
'Saw
|
56.1135 | Faulk looks to be the man | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 07 1994 13:02 | 15 |
| I have to agree that the pats winning streak to end the season did more
harm then good. The #4 pick couldnt have worked out any worse for the
pats. Not only did they not get a shot at the 2 IMPACT players in the
draft, the picked at #4 where a QB should have went and they didnt
need 1, couldnt trade down and still get McGinnest so the take a 8-10
type player with a #4 pick...
Faulk looked good in his first game out, but many RB's have 1-3 good
games and fizzle... I just wished he was in a pats uniform, patriots
were unable to control the clock and keep marino on the bench...
4td's in the air, 1 on the ground for 35 pts and still lose a close
game...
Bummed
|
56.1136 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 07 1994 13:38 | 35 |
|
> McGinest looks raw but he certainly is more
> talented than Chris Singleton, Ray Agnew, Vagas Ferguson, Eugene
> Chung or any of a number of Pats first rounders.
>> On the other hand, he'd better be. McGinest is a #4 pick. I believe
>> Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
>> these guys even lower.
If memory serves, Singleton and Agnew were the 8 and 10 picks that
New England acquired by trading the number three to Seattle. The
Seahawks used that pick to take some stiff named Cortez Kennedy.
We certainly wouldn't want to see Cortez in a Pats uniform now
would we? Then there are the two number one overalls that New England
used to take Irving Fryar, who isn't here anymore and never lived
up to his billing when he was, and the agile but fragile Ken Simms
who showed flashes of brilliance between long long stays on the IR
list.
>> behind 1993's. It's too early to say that that hasn't happened, but
>> lost in the recent Patriots Euphoria, I think it's also fair to say
>> that outlook isn't quite as good as when we were all pretty confident
>> that a Wilkinson/Faulk/Stokes/Wheatley was headed our way as a payback
>> for the misery of those first 11 games.
The Pats are still two to three years away from being a serious
contender. Wilkerson probably would have sped up the clock a
bit but whether Faulk or Wheatley would have (given that we now
have Butts and Thompson) is highly debatable. I'll take the positive
energy generated by the small win streak and this pre-season over
the stigma of a 15 loss season and a chance to draft an effectively
unknown quantity.
|
56.1137 | | DOCTP::TESSIER | | Wed Sep 07 1994 13:57 | 14 |
| Re. Parcells' input into the draft in New York, one of the more notable
cases where Parcells and Young disagreed was on Dave Meggett. Parcells
wanted no part of him, insisting that they didn't need another short
guy (they already had Morris). Young thought that Meggett could be an
impact player. I guess we know who was right.
Re. the Giants not being a great team, it's true that LT was the catalyst,
but the '86 team was indeed a great team through and through. I'll
match the linebacking corps of Taylor, Carson, Banks, Reasons, and
Pepper Johnson against any other. In fact, I'll go so far as to say
that the '86 team's defense ranks alongside the '85 Bears' squad as
the most dominant of the past 15 years.
Ken
|
56.1138 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound-world | Wed Sep 07 1994 14:13 | 6 |
|
but George Young did allow Parcells to draft Guyton in either the 7th or
8th round the same year they picked Meggett. Guyton's a hard hitter with
decent cover skills who's probably over-rated by Bill.........
mike
|
56.1139 | Only gut response, but wasn't that thrilled with off/pre-season | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 07 1994 14:16 | 48 |
|
>> On the other hand, he'd better be. McGinest is a #4 pick. I believe
>> Singleton/Agnew were 8/10 (wasted picks nonetheless) and the rest of
>> these guys even lower.
>
> If memory serves, Singleton and Agnew were the 8 and 10 picks that
> New England acquired by trading the number three to Seattle. The
> Seahawks used that pick to take some stiff named Cortez Kennedy.
I'm in full agreement that the standing draft record under Parcells is
nowhere near as bad as that which predeced him. After all, in spite of
much pressure and speculation that he'd go for "his type of player"
(defense, trade down for O-line, etc.), it wasn't till draft day 1993
that Parcells and mainly Parcells alone made the call at #1 that I'm
still convinced will do more for this franchise than any player since
John Hannah (and I guess we'd like to hope for even more). It's just
that I was hoping for more from the 1994 draft, certainly much more in
the short term (admittedly of lesser importance than the long term).
> The Pats are still two to three years away from being a serious
> contender. Wilkerson probably would have sped up the clock a
> bit but whether Faulk or Wheatley would have (given that we now
> have Butts and Thompson) is highly debatable.
By the same token, Parcells brought in Butts and Thompson to win _now_,
after a younger Leonard Russell who a year ago was supposedly more than
qualified for the role of a "Parcells back" was evaluated in the
off-season in the most honest and real of terms possible. I now
believe that Parcells is not necessarily thinking first and foremost
of rebuilding, as neither player is likely to be of much use after
this 2-3 year timeframe (not to mention that Fryar could be serving the
same purpose, but which I could defend when the goal was so obviously
to rebuild). When an impact player is in your grasp, even if it's
only a "potential" impact (I can't agree with "unknown"), it's
disappointing not to get it. Maybe it wasn't realistic to _expect_
another Smith/Sanders/Thomas from a Faulk or Wheatley, but history shows
that having such a player on top of the solid overall base is the most
successful formula, so to that extent, yes, I am a bit disappointed
that the Pats didn't get their shot at that player in likely their last
opportunity for some time. Willie McGinest? Who knows, but the
chances are probably an order of magnitude less that he'll be an impact
player. Parcells has already dismissed out of hand any talk that the
name should be used in the same breath as LT's, in any manner, including
Parcells' plans for deploying him. "Completely different type of player"
was the assessment.
glenn
|
56.1140 | Thru the years with the Jests | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Sep 07 1994 14:29 | 17 |
| Just using the Jests(tm) as an example-first round picks are a
crapshoot:
1993-Big win,the Jets get Johnny Johnson from Phoenix in exchange for
NOT taking MAJOR bust Garrison Hearst. The Jets take Marvin Jones with
their lower pick and he looks like a budding star.
1990-Huge loss. With #2 pick in draft,they take Blair Thomas over
Cortez Kennedy,Junior Seau,Emitt Smith and Rodney Hampton(among
others).
1983- Take Ken O'Brien over Dan Marino.
1980-Huge loss. Trade their two number 1's to SF so they can move up to #2
in draft where they take Lam Jones,while 49ers take Earl Cooper and
Jimmy Webb-who play roles in SF's first two superbowl titles. Jones
never amounts to anything.
|
56.1141 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 07 1994 15:43 | 32 |
| >> By the same token, Parcells brought in Butts and Thompson to win _now_,
>> after a younger Leonard Russell who a year ago was supposedly more than
>> qualified for the role of a "Parcells back" was evaluated in the
>> off-season in the most honest and real of terms possible. I now
>> believe that Parcells is not necessarily thinking first and foremost
>> of rebuilding, as neither player is likely to be of much use after
>> this 2-3 year timeframe
Butts and Thompson have been in the league three to four to five years
apiece. The age difference between them and Russell is negligible if
there is any. Russell isn't gone because Parcells wants to "win now"
and is willing to sacrifice youth. Russell is gone because his agent
foolishly advised him to turn down the best offer the Pats would give.
Apparently, they thought they were still dealing with the 'old' Pats.
If Russell had accepted the offer (a very reasonable $1.4 million),
he'd still be here.
>> Maybe it wasn't realistic to _expect_ another Smith/Sanders/Thomas from
>> a Faulk or Wheatley, but history shows that having such a player on top
>> of the solid overall base is the most successful formula,
>> so to that extent, yes, I am a bit disappointed that the Pats didn't get
>> their shot at that player in likely their last opportunity for some time.
>> Willie McGinest?
Of Smith, Sanders and Thomas only one has any SB rings. OJ retired without
any. Walter Payton acquired his late in his career after the Bears built
a monster defense and offensive line. Earl Campbell never got one. And
on and on. As for Willie McGinest, if he turns out to be just a solid
starting outside linebacker who can effectively rush the passer, that'll
be enough. He won't be another LT. No one will. If McGinest can play
to AT's (Andre Tippett) level, I'll be ecstatic.
|
56.1142 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Wed Sep 07 1994 16:11 | 7 |
|
Just to clarify the "No tarp on the field during the monsoon on
Sunday". There is an NFL rule which states the field can not be
covered after a certain time. So the Miami grounds crew were just
following the rule, by not putting the tarp on the field.
Ron
|
56.1143 | I Heard them mention the 1.5 hr rule on the tarp.. | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 07 1994 16:57 | 22 |
| Even Though Thomas doesnt have a SB ring he's been there 4 times (IN
a Row), would the bills have made it there without a SuperStart RB ?
(I Doubt it), would NYG WIthout the Power Running Game, or Dallas
without Emmit have won the SB (Proberbly not).
They Say Defense Win Championships, we'll Id say you need the QB, a
Running Game and a Defense :-) (OK you need it all)....
Hey If Buffalo had a better kicker they would have won a SB :-)
Having a Top RB give's you the ability to control the clock and keep
the High Potent Offense's off the field. If the patriots had a better
Running Game Marino couldnt have thrown 5 TD's on sunday. And if Dallas
didnt have a Running Game could they have kept SF out of the SB the
last 2 years...
You need the Running Game, maybe not a Emmitt/Thurman/Barry type but
you need to at least have the ability to control the clock. A huge
example is Houston VS Buffalo when they let Buffalo come back from a
HUGE DEFICIT (Couldnt control the clock... No RB).
mab
|
56.1144 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Thu Sep 08 1994 11:06 | 11 |
| > without Emmit have won the SB (Proberbly not).
^^^^^^^^^
I looked this word up in Websters and it wasn't there. Then it dawned on
me.
It's referring to the Biblical Book of Proberbs, which deals with things
like what you need to win the SB and things like that.
Suddenly, it all made sense.......
|
56.1145 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 12 1994 00:58 | 7 |
| More problems for the secondary but at least the running game showed signs of
life.
Am I the only one who felt that Bledsoe had started throwing and that should
have been an incomplete forward pass instead of a fumble and touchdown?
George
|
56.1146 | We wuz robbed | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Mon Sep 12 1994 08:24 | 7 |
|
re -.1
No
j/
|
56.1147 | At least your team didn't lose 38-9 | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Sep 12 1994 09:06 | 3 |
|
His arm was going back not forward. = FUMBLE
|
56.1148 | Bledsoe's the man. Guyton hasn't done squat! | 56826::MORGAN | | Mon Sep 12 1994 09:23 | 7 |
| Bledsoe's release is quick, but not THAT quick. Bad call...
Is it just incredibly poor pass coverage, no pass rush, or a
combination of both with these guys? The two safeties have been
nowhere near the ball on these deep passes down the middle.
Steve
|
56.1149 | Cincinnati is a must win nexted week | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:10 | 11 |
| The best performance by a defensive back in Foxboro yesterday was by
Beasley Reece. He was brutally honest in his analysis of the woeful
shortcomings of the defensive backs, especially safety Myron Guyton.
This ex-Giant looked simply pitiful yesterday. Hurst I thought had a
pretty decent day. Reynolds was average at best, and Barnett got burnt
big-time more than once.
On the positive side, the only TD the Bills sscored in the 2nd half was
on Bledsoe's fumble.
NAZZ
|
56.1150 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:14 | 9 |
|
Hurst good day?
Reed's Td was because of Hurst. Beebe was being double teamed by
hurst and Guyton on his TD? IMO Hurst looked the worst.
Chap
|
56.1151 | Tough to blame the cornerback when the safety gives no support | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:18 | 8 |
| Reed's TD was because of Guyton, as was Beebe's. In both instances,
the Pats were in a zone coverage. On Reed's TD, Hurst released him to
the inside, and Guyton didn't recognize the coverage until Reed was 10
yards past him. On Beebe's TD, Guyton was in good position but NEVER
TURNED AROUND!!!!! The ball zipped pasty his ear to Beebe for the
score.
NAZZ
|
56.1154 | atleast they're exciting | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:43 | 4 |
|
Al Groh is all the problem any one team can handle..........
mike
|
56.1155 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:44 | 15 |
| There are two factors that make me feel that the secondary will come around.
First, their problems seem to be not knowing what the other guys are doing thus
leaving gaps in the zone. That type of thing should cure itself as they get to
know each other and start anticipating what the other guy will do.
Second, the quarterbacks that beat them were the two best in the division and
two of the best in the A.F.C. Every time the Pats made a mistake they got
burnt. Other quarterbacks will find some of those gaps but not all of them.
If they can score 35 points each against Cinci and Detroit over the next
couple weeks they should be ok and by the time they see these guys again the
secondary should have gotten it's kinks worked out.
This is going to be an exciting season,
George
|
56.1156 | Poor clock management/timeout management etc | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Sep 12 1994 14:16 | 10 |
| Bledsoe hit his receiver about 4yrds up, not his fault the receiver
should know where he has to get to, had he made one more step forward
before breaking accross the middle its first down and they would have
had to take that snap Bledsoe would have downed it and at least Bahr
would have had a shot at Tying... I dont blame bledsoe for that one but
he should have went for a 1-3 yrd on 4rth down pass to the outside...
Even an incomplete pass would have shown more effort (Brains) then what
he chose to do...
MaB
|
56.1157 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 12 1994 14:42 | 9 |
| Bledsoe admitted he screwed that up in the post game interview and that he
should have thrown a sideline pass. Of course the Bills would have been looking
for just such a pass so it's not clear that it would have worked.
The two time outs they had to call early didn't help either. And of course if
the defense hadn't given up 38 points that call wouldn't have meant anything.
By rights he should have been kneeling down with a 35-14 lead at that point.
George
|
56.1158 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 15:04 | 10 |
| > Bledsoe admitted he screwed that up in the post game interview and that he
>should have thrown a sideline pass. Of course the Bills would have been looking
>for just such a pass so it's not clear that it would have worked.
>
> The two time outs they had to call early didn't help either. And of course if
>the defense hadn't given up 38 points that call wouldn't have meant anything.
>By rights he should have been kneeling down with a 35-14 lead at that point.
If the o-line could've held off the Buffalo D on that TD Lodish got, the
Pats would've one too.....
|
56.1159 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Mon Sep 12 1994 15:18 | 4 |
| >If the o-line could've held off the Buffalo D on that TD Lodish got, the
>Pats would've one too.....
one what?
|
56.1160 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 15:28 | 11 |
| > one what?
won one.
I probably should have spelled it "wone" -- a shorthand for won one.....
but I just used the one word to mean two....
hth,
'Saw
|
56.1161 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Mon Sep 12 1994 15:40 | 3 |
| Well don't let it happen again.
Mike (One/Won Police)
|
56.1162 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 15:53 | 8 |
| >
> Well don't let it happen again.
>
> Mike (One/Won Police)
It was intentional. I guess I'm just going to have to pay my Lobbyists
for Won/One Shorthand more money.....8^)
|
56.1163 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Sep 12 1994 16:17 | 6 |
| The defense stinks, the parking stinks, the ArianHitlerYouth
security guards with the Burger King headphones stink and the
Port-A-Toilets stink. Meet the new Patriots, same as it ever
was.
/Don
|
56.1164 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 16:31 | 9 |
| >
> /Don
>
Okay, but the burning, throbbing question here becomes:
Do the Patriettes stink?
|
56.1165 | I never smelled one | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Mon Sep 12 1994 19:06 | 1 |
|
|
56.1166 | same as it ever was part II | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Tue Sep 13 1994 09:03 | 10 |
|
But Donnie you forgot they don't have All-World Fryar to BLAM(tm).....
;^)
speakin' of AWF, what happened to him this weekend? Did he forget to
wash Dan's jock? I mean atleast Michael's having a little hissy tissy
fued with Boytoy Troy to explain his disappearing act.....
mike
|
56.1167 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 10:38 | 4 |
| If Fryar had a bad game a good possibility was that Green Bay had him double
up. Lots of coaches would have done that given his big day against the Pats.
George
|
56.1168 | He's a waste | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:01 | 4 |
|
Fryar's has made a career out of bad days, with or without double teams.
mike
|
56.1169 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:16 | 9 |
| Baring a case of drops, is it really his fault if he has a good day or a bad
day?
Somehow it doesn't seem that being a wide receiver would lend itself to
good and bad days. If you run down 10 steps and break to the sideline you
are either open or you are not and you either catch the ball or you don't.
What else can go wrong?
George
|
56.1170 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:23 | 7 |
| >> you either catch the ball or you don't. What else can go wrong?
I'd call that either a good day or a bad day. You could also
run the wrong route thus not being where the ball is thrown to.
billl
|
56.1171 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:25 | 5 |
| Does Fryar have a problem with running the wrong route and dropping the
ball? I've heard that he is eccentric an he has a history of off field
antics but that's a complaint I've never heard.
George
|
56.1172 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:28 | 4 |
| I thought you asked what else could go wrong?
billl
|
56.1173 | they don't call him Stonehands for nothin' ask Marty | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:44 | 4 |
|
haven't watched Fryar too much have you George????????
mike
|
56.1174 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:48 | 14 |
| I'm far from Wide Receiver material, but I've noticed that the key thing
to being a WR has always been getting open, and then catching the ball.
Nowadays, getting open is as much a question of THINKING as it is speed
and quickness. The WR has to have the ability to read the defense, because
a lot of offensive schemes are expecting the WR and QB to make the same
read and use the pass route based on that read.
Hands can be improved, but it helps if you're born with them.
Raw speed isn't a necessity (see Bilitnikof for example).
Just a few opinions.....
|
56.1175 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:04 | 25 |
| Re <<< Note 56.1172 by MKFSA::LONG "Strive for five!" >>>
> I thought you asked what else could go wrong?
You must have come in somewhere in the middle. I'll try to help you catch
up.
This all started because someone said that Fryar had a bad day against the
Pack with the implication that it was his fault. That sounded strange to me
because it doesn't seem that being a wide receiver is prone to good days and
bad days.
As others have said, being a wide receiver consists of getting open and
catching the ball which doesn't seem to be a talent that would come or go like
hitting a baseball or being able to knock down pins in a bowling ally.
Baring injury, if Fryar or any other wide receiver seemed to be open some
days and not others then I'd suspect that it was the defense that had changed,
rather than suspecting that the receiver was having a good or bad day.
Thus I concluded that Fryar's "Bad Day" against the Pack would most likely
be due to the Packers coaching staff seeing how he ran all over the Patriots
and making adjustments to keep the ball away from him.
George
|
56.1176 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:07 | 7 |
| Speed and quickness can be "off" just like hitting a baseball.
Hands that are soft one Sunday can be hard on another Sunday....
'Saw
|
56.1179 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:24 | 5 |
|
WR's these days only need to develop a good pushoff move to go with good
hands. It's a shame what they've done to the passing rules......
mike
|
56.1180 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:38 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1177 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Did anyone watch the game? If not then drop the continued
> speculation about why Fryar's numbers were down for the week.
-and-
> It's ridiculous. Fryar's numbers were down for the week for the
> same reason that Andre Reed's numbers will be down next week.
> He won't be playing against the New England Patriots secondary.
Can we assume that you watched the game or are you breaking your own rule?
George
|
56.1182 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:53 | 13 |
| >
> Nothing gets by you, Frank.
>
That's usually why they have me play cornerback.....
> In Bilitnikoff's case, three gallons of stickum didn't hurt either.
But he was also quick.
|
56.1183 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 13:26 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1181 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Sorry, George. Far be it from me to stop you from going on and
> on and on about something you know nothing about.
So let me get this straight. You don't know any more about Fryar's game
against the Pack than I do but it's ok for you to go on and on about something
which you know nothing about.
One set of rules for you, another for everyone else?
George
|
56.1185 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 13:50 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1184 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Use your common sense, George. He played against one of the
> best defenses in the league Sunday or didn't you know that?
> Comparing his numbers vs. Green Bay to his numbers vs. a team
> that has given up ~750 passing yards in the last two weeks has
> to seem a little ludicrous even to you.
Well this actually fits my theory better than the one I was arguing against.
My theory was that he had a "bad day" because he was being covered better than
he was against the Pats. Someone else was arguing that he had a bad day because
he is streaky and prone to bad days on his own despite the coverage.
George
|
56.1187 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 13 1994 14:20 | 11 |
| I don't think anyone expected Fryar to have that kind of day.
At any rate, next up is Cincinnati. Both the Pats and Bangles go into the
game with 0-2 records. I feel good about this game and the following week
which I believe is in Detroit. The Pats offense is for real (ok, not 35 points
a game) but the defense will work out their problems. They should be 2-2 after
4 weeks.
Anyone got the schedule? I haven't seen it around anywhere.
George
|
56.1188 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 13 1994 15:00 | 38 |
|
1994 Patriots schedule (from the Globe)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESEASON (HOME GAMES IN CAPS)
August 5 (Fri) NEW ORLEANS 8:00pm
August 13(Sat) at LA Rams 10:00pm
August 18(Thurs) WASHINGTON 7:00pm
August 26(Fri) at Green Bay 7:00pm
REGULAR SEASON
Sept 4 (Sun) at Miami 4:00pm
Sept 11(Sun) BUFFALO 1:00pm
Sept 18(Sun) at Cincinnati 1:00pm
Sept 25(Sun) at Detroit 4:00pm
Oct 2 (Sun) GREEN BAY 1:00pm
Oct 9 (Sun) LA RAIDERS 4:00pm
Oct 16 (Sun) at New York Jets 1:00pm
Oct 23 (Sun) Open
Oct 30 (Sun) MIAMI 1:00pm
Nov 6 (Sun) at Cleveland 1:00pm
Nov 13 (Sun) MINNESOTA 1:00pm
Nov 20 (Sun) SAN DIEGO 1:00pm
Nov 27 (Sun) at Indianapolis 8:00pm
Dec 4 (Sun) NEW YORK JETS 1:00pm
Dec 11 (Sun) INDIANAPOLIS 1:00pm
Dec 18 (Sun) at Buffalo 1:00pm
Dec 24 (Sat) at Chicago 1:00pm
|
56.1189 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Sep 13 1994 19:06 | 4 |
| One thing about the Pats games is that they are exciting. More
scoring than a Hugh Hefner party. It's got to be killing Parcells.
/Don
|
56.1190 | Pat's fans "Thanks Brett" | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Oct 03 1994 10:33 | 10 |
| Is there any doubt in anyone's mind that the Pats can thank
Brett Farve for them being 3-2 thised morning?
I always have mixed feeling s when my two favorite teams meet, but
I had concluded long ago that the Pack is going nowhere with Farve.
His numbers were impressive, but he threw the key interception in
the end zone in the fourth quarter, to allow the Pats to snatch
victory from the jaws of defeat.
=Bob=
|
56.1191 | Parcells will loose that battle quick | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Mon Oct 03 1994 10:56 | 16 |
|
bad ass case of tunnel vision in Farve. I was there and atleast 4 Patriots
were in ther area. After watching him yesterday, I got a feeling that
Billy-Jo might get a chance soon...
I found out how Parcells can loose his sainthood yesterday. Wait until
him him and Drew have a real tissy, Bill will findout quick enough who's
the man/boy is in this town. Most of the fans I heard yesterday felt it
was only a matter of time before he breaks all of Marino's records.
Shouldn't they be hoping he breaks Montana's? He's got a great arm no
doubt about it but decision making is still questionable as it with
most slingers with big arms.
also no doubt about it the Patriots are playoff bound.......
mike
|
56.1192 | go buffs | BSS::MARLAND | | Mon Oct 03 1994 11:06 | 2 |
| Hope your Patriots kick Raider ass next week.
a bronco fan
|
56.1193 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 03 1994 12:26 | 8 |
| Last I remember, the Pats and Pack were tied at 3 turnovers each. Add to
that the 2 missed fieldgoal attempts and it appeared that the Pats were
trying as hard to give the game to the Packers as their quarterback was trying
to give it back.
Big game from Sharp, he almost won it for the Pack.
George
|
56.1194 | Bledsoe > Favre, downstairs _and_ upstairs... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 03 1994 14:24 | 15 |
|
> Shouldn't they be hoping he breaks Montana's? He's got a great arm no
> doubt about it but decision making is still questionable as it with
> most slingers with big arms.
But whose decision-making if anyone's (besides Favre's) was
questionable yesterday? With his called use of timeouts and his
decision to run that last play from scrimmage, Parcells is becoming
an outright riverboat gambler in his old age. I still say that
Bledsoe's poise under the heat and in the clutch is just fine, and
downright uncanny for someone his age. The rest is just nit-picking,
the kind of faults you can find with any QB on any given day...
glenn
|
56.1195 | uncanny's reaching imo | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Mon Oct 03 1994 15:04 | 12 |
|
well Glenn I saw him force a few balls in yesterday. He threw the first TD
between three defenders. If he had less arm strength the ball would have been
picked off. He also had a couple of balls tipped besides the interception.
Like all the great arms he feels he can throw through the coverage.
I feel bad for Butts. The guy is probably hurting but because thet let
Russell get away they're forcing Butts to play through the pain in order
to cover up their plunder. One thing for sure the faithful at the game want
to string po' po' marion up........
mike
|
56.1196 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:06 | 5 |
| Watching/listening to yesterday's game I discovered there is an
announcer worse than Theisman, Jerry "if I only had a brain" Glanville!
billl
|
56.1197 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:24 | 9 |
| | Watching/listening to yesterday's game I discovered there is an
| announcer worse than Theisman, Jerry "if I only had a brain" Glanville!
Glanville actually made a few good observations on the "inside game".
Unfortunately these gems were few and far between, and tempered with
a mountain of mindless blather. Overall, I think he's worse than
Theisman, but neither is as bad a Joe Namath.
=Bob=
|
56.1198 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:27 | 15 |
| Did you notice that FOX blew the final field goal? The camera missed it and
the announcers didn't say a word until the play had been over for quite some
time. The only way I could tell it was good was when the Patriots pilled up on
Matt Barr for the celebration.
At this point I guess it doesn't mean anything since the Pats will be back to
NBC for the rest of the regular season.
Another thing that's weird is that inter-conference games seem to go to the
network who has the visiting team instead of the network that has the home
team. That seems really strange since it means that the network has to visit
stadiums in the other conference normally handled by the other network. You'd
think they would do it the other way around.
George
|
56.1199 | Sorry guys, you won't convince me to be so jaded... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:30 | 23 |
|
> well Glenn I saw him force a few balls in yesterday. He threw the first TD
> between three defenders. If he had less arm strength the ball would have been
> picked off.
When beautiful passes thrown right where they have to be for touchdowns
are included in the "errors in judgment" category, I think purism of
football theory has truly run amock. "If he had less arm strength..."
What the heck does that mean? Knowing that you have that arm strength
is part of the QB's judgment, no? Or is the logic that Bledsoe has
that great arm but he's not smart enough yet to know that he throws
harder than Jim Harbaugh so he shouldn't be making great plays like
that... ;-)
My conclusion: results are what count. So far, it's 1700+ yards, 11
TDs, 7 INTs personally; three straight wins, the last two huge ones
for the team. And, I repeat, just 21 years old (I said "uncanny for
his age"). It's pretty remarkable, and appreciating the development
of impending greatness from the start, as it unfolds, is the most
fulfilling way for the spectator...
glenn
|
56.1200 | Give Leroy a chance | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:40 | 11 |
| The TD's are down becuase of RAY CRITTENDONE, is that 2 or 3 balls
he should have had in the endzone and dropped todate this season ?
My wife was watching the game with me and said the new Fox Announcers
STINK... I had to explain that they were not the #1 Broadcast team for
FOX. The Pats still have many area's the can use/need improvement and
there at 3-2 with once again 2 >6 pt loses....
Bledsoe is looking GREAT, now if the Running Game could just jell...
mab
|
56.1201 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:40 | 8 |
| > Another thing that's weird is that inter-conference games seem to go to the
>network who has the visiting team instead of the network that has the home
>team. That seems really strange since it means that the network has to visit
>stadiums in the other conference normally handled by the other network. You'd
>think they would do it the other way around.
It's always been that way since I can remember...
|
56.1202 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:44 | 13 |
| >> It's pretty remarkable, and appreciating the development of
>> impending greatness from the start, as it unfolds, is the most
>> fulfilling way for the spectator...
I feel a little queasy. Drew had a good day Sunday (I was there!)
not incredible but solid. If Barh misses that field goal like he
almost did, the offense chalks up 14 points in a losing effort.
The INT was avoidable but those things happen when you try to force
the ball in there. He got away with a similar one last week that a
Lions defender dropped. He'll learn to be more picky, I hope. I was
more happy with the play of Rod Smith, Chris Slade and Tim Goad. Those
guys and the rest of the D really carried the day.
|
56.1203 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Oct 03 1994 17:19 | 3 |
| True, Tommy...Slade had a *huge* game.
Mark.
|
56.1204 | There must be a reason... | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:18 | 5 |
| I would guess that uncertainty over what games are blacked out or not
is the reason. It may have to do with markets bordering the blackout
limits.
billte
|
56.1205 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:24 | 6 |
|
the reason is simple. NBC couldn't cover the top teams if they couldn't
have rights to cover some NFC teams. That's why the deal was struck this
way in the last TV contracts and this one just signed last year.
mike
|
56.1206 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:52 | 5 |
| been that way as far back as I remember. In the 1970's CBS would have
needed things that way to cover the top teams (Steeler,Raiders,Dolphins)
The Crazy Met
|
56.1207 | Chill out, Mike | O8SIS::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Wed Oct 05 1994 08:02 | 34 |
| Deja vu all over again.
Over the years, Pats fans have always yakked about the "could've/
should've" play that would have won the game. Now, because the team
is winning, it's the play that could have LOST the game. Gimme a
break!
Is there some sort of disease that many of us suffer from that causes
this reaction? Bledsoe, for his age and experience, is the most
exciting athlete in Boston, and certainly the very best QB the Pats
have ever had. Please note the reference to age and experience.
Given that, why is he now being looked at thru a magnifier in the hopes
of finding a fatal flaw? Are fans preparing themselves for the flop?
Do they secretly want him to fail so that the Pats can't get drubbed
again in the SB?
This syndrome applies to all the pro teams in Boston and N.E. And, it
really drives me crazy. Why can't the fans around here just take what
he does and be happy with it, while hoping that his improvement
continues under the tutelage of Parcells?
It is a team effort, but the QB is the most noticable player on the
field. How much of Bledsoe's improvement and performance is
attributable to the work of the offensive line is unknown. He isn't
often forced to make a quick decision while under extreme pressure, so
perhaps that is why he hasn't failed very often. If and when that does
happen, will it somehow deminish his overall value to the team? I
think not.
Let's enjoy the games for what they are and appreciate a fine athlete
while he is still able to perform. It could end in the next game.
Lee
|
56.1208 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 09:03 | 10 |
56.1209 | Steve Grogan is the all-time best! | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin BXB1-2/H06 293-5664 | Wed Oct 05 1994 09:29 | 7 |
| Bledsoe may be great, but let's not log him into the Pat's all-time
best category. Steve Grogan has that honor.....let him enjoy it for at
least another year. If Bledsoe is still effective by age 25, he should
have set all the team records.....then he will be the best. Grogan was
around for many years, and he is still the best in my books.
RTG
|
56.1210 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 10:31 | 7 |
| re: .1207
It might have something to do with many of the Pats fans also being
Red Sox fans.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1211 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 10:34 | 4 |
|
Perelli was better than Grogan.
George
|
56.1212 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Oct 05 1994 11:02 | 3 |
| Who broke into Groaner's account?
Mark.
|
56.1213 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Wed Oct 05 1994 13:29 | 2 |
| Rams need a real QB...
|
56.1214 | Chandler out | HBAHBA::HAAS | australopithecus westvirginius | Wed Oct 05 1994 13:31 | 6 |
| > Rams need a real QB...
They had one but he's injured. So they're back to a pretender, Chris
Miller.
TTom
|
56.1215 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Wed Oct 05 1994 13:31 | 2 |
| Chandler's ok, but they need a little better one than that...
|
56.1216 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:03 | 4 |
|
Hey now, they have Tommy Maddox. :*)
Claybone
|
56.1217 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:06 | 2 |
|
I agree Parilli was better than Grogan.........
|
56.1218 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:06 | 5 |
56.1219 | grogan>parilli>bradshaw | 25022::BREEN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:11 | 1 |
|
|
56.1220 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:16 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1219 by 25022::BREEN >>>
> -< grogan>parilli>bradshaw >-
grogan<parilli<bradshaw
George
|
56.1221 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:21 | 6 |
| >> grogan<parilli<bradshaw
George, you beat me to it.
billl
|
56.1222 | Over-analysis can be dangerous sometimes... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:31 | 13 |
|
That's just about exactly the point I've been trying to make, Lee.
Very well said. Yesterday I read a quote from the great Bill
Parcells where he said that even if Bledsoe were not to improve one
iota further, his progress to quality finished product is still the
fastest that he's ever seen. I guess I still don't understand the
claims of how stupid this kid's decisions can be sometimes, or how
he's forcing the ball too much (to the eternal discomfort of the
other team, no doubt). I'm watching all the same games and I was
beginning to think that I was just hallucinating or something...
glenn
|
56.1223 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:34 | 7 |
|
I read that Parcells quote and I didn't get the same
thing out of it at all. And over-analysis? I don't think
calling running for it on a 4th and 1 with time running
out stupid is 'over-analyzing'? And psst...watching Houston
on Monday night sure put Faulk's season openeing performance
in perspective, didn't it?
|
56.1225 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:57 | 5 |
| Tommy, who was on the O-line for Cleveland when Brown played? Anyone post
that info?
The Crazy Met
|
56.1226 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:57 | 6 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1224 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
Just think, if you were the last guy on earth, there'd be no one left
for you to hate.
George
|
56.1227 | more psychobabble - Parcells would approve :-) | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:04 | 6 |
| re: .1226
and why is that? people can and do hate themselves.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1228 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:06 | 3 |
| George, please try to keep up.
Mark.
|
56.1229 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:15 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1227 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>and why is that? people can and do hate themselves.
Oh yeh, good point.
George
|
56.1230 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:16 | 5 |
| re: Browns O-line
I've posted before that I remember Gene Hickerson was an
all-pro guard, and there was one other lineman of note.
His name escapes me right now.
|
56.1231 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:20 | 7 |
56.1232 | Lou the Toe | 25022::BREEN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:22 | 2 |
| Lou Groza the legendary place kicker also played on the line. I'm
nearly sure it was offensive tackle.
|
56.1233 | Forest for the trees... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:39 | 41 |
|
> I read that Parcells quote and I didn't get the same
> thing out of it at all.
I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe
me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all"
didn't tip you off. Exactly what did you make of it? I think
it's pretty evident that Parcells is *more* than happy with Bledsoe
right now (which is not to say that he's not going to hit some rocky
spots along the way; he certainly will, and Parcells will let him know
about it).
> And over-analysis? I don't think
> calling running for it on a 4th and 1 with time running
> out stupid is 'over-analyzing'?
It is when a couple such examples lead to conclusions like "if Drew
doesn't smarten up he [won't be winning any championships]" and
"sometimes he really makes you wonder if he's not a case of a
million-dollar arm and a ten-cent head". You've outright come out and
said on several occasions that Bledsoe is lacking something upstairs.
Sure, I think such an extrapolation is totally, completely ridiculous,
when what's actually been happening on the field is a kid lighting up
the skies on a pace to break the all-time NFL passing record! (not to
mention producing a winning record to date)! How else should I take
such analysis?
> And psst...watching Houston
> on Monday night sure put Faulk's season openeing performance
> in perspective, didn't it?
You're hung up on that single performance, not me. Since then it's
been another 100+ yard game, the two 60-yard games, and a 90. Faulk's
doing just fine, and according to the comment I read in last Friday's
paper it's coming against teams stacking the line with 8-man fronts
because no one has any respect at all for Jim Harbaugh. Just keep
watching...
glenn
|
56.1234 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Thu Oct 06 1994 09:46 | 6 |
|
Personally I get the feeling that Parcells would love nothing better than
to win a tittle without a great running game. Given his ego, I think he'd
love to show everyone that he can win by the ground or by the air...
mike
|
56.1235 | Dream with me for a minute | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Thu Oct 06 1994 10:13 | 9 |
| If the Patriots had traded up to the second spot in the draft (given
up say their VALUABLE (please not sarcasm here) 2nd and 3rd round picks
as well as the 4th pick in the draft), then Marshall Faulk would be a
Patriot today.
When Faulk and Bledsoe in the same backfield, the Patriots could have
been prime Super Bowl contenders well into the next decade.
NAZZ
|
56.1236 | But how could they win, without Willie McGinn | 25022::BREEN | | Thu Oct 06 1994 10:35 | 1 |
|
|
56.1237 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Oct 06 1994 11:37 | 49 |
|
> I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
> latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe
> me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all"
> didn't tip you off. Exactly what did you make of it?
You either are quoting a completely different article than I
remembered (Tuesday October, 4th) or you're making it up as you
go along. Because when I fish out the Globe article that I rem-
embered the quote reads, "I would like to think we'll see some
improvement," says Parcells. "But if there is no room for im-
provement then this is the fastest acceleration to completion
I've ever seen." Nothing about "Big Tuna himself pretty much
says it all" but it does say "I would like to think we'll see
some improvement."
>> You've outright come out and said on several occasions that Bledsoe
>> is lacking something upstairs.
I've come right out and said he's made some stupid decisions. He's
not god, you know.
>> Sure, I think such an extrapolation is totally, completely ridiculous,
>> when what's actually been happening on the field is a kid lighting up
>> the skies on a pace to break the all-time NFL passing record! (not to
>> mention producing a winning record to date)! How else should I take
>> such analysis?
The stupid rules enacted to open up scoring havve the numbers up in
just about every category. That's not to completely take away from
Drew because he has been super bt he's not completely *there* yet.
And that winning record is 3-2. Hardly cause for a celebration at City
Hall Plaza.
>> You're hung up on that single performance, not me. Since then it's
>> been another 100+ yard game, the two 60-yard games, and a 90. Faulk's
>> doing just fine, and according to the comment I read in last Friday's
>> paper it's coming against teams stacking the line with 8-man fronts
>> because no one has any respect at all for Jim Harbaugh. Just keep
>> watching...
After Faulk's first game against Houston we saw a note posted about
how close the Pats came to having your dream backfield. Of course, we
now know that just about anyone is capable of running for 148 yards
against Houston. We also got to hear how Faulk ran for more than 4
yards per carry against the Steelers' 'fine defense'. That 'fine
defense' is giving up more than 4 yards per carry all season long.
Let's just put Faulk's year in perspective - so far he's done nothing.
|
56.1239 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 06 1994 12:32 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1238 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> It ain't about hate, George. If you can't run with the big dogs then
> stay on the porch.
Too bad you didn't follow your own advice on this O.J. Brown debate since
you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
So now you have read "some sports book" where "someone" says that O.J.
couldn't run until he had a better line and that proves that your right?
I saw Brown play and I saw O.J. play. You read some book by someone.
GO HOME!!! BACK ON YOUR PORCH!!!
BAD DOG!!!
George
|
56.1241 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Oct 06 1994 13:44 | 11 |
| re: OJ
Another factor in his "emergance" after 2-3 "bust" years
was a coaching change. I forget who came in and who left,
(I think Lou Saban was involved), but I remember reading
an article at the time that the old coach refused to
build his offense around one guy, while the new coach
said his offense would feature "OJ left, OJ right, then
OJ up the middle".
=Bob=
|
56.1242 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 06 1994 13:57 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1240 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>After OJ
> was injured in his second season, he was considered a bust in
> Buffalo.
By who? The Buffalo equivalent of Dan Shaughnesy? Are you telling me that the
people running football programs felt after 2 years that O.J. wouldn't make in
in the NFL? Or was it some dick head writer who expected miracles and after 2
years concluded that O.J. was a flash in the pan. Now there's a writer to
quote.
>In fact,
> it's been posted that OJ had a very good blocking back and at
> least two all-pro linemen to run behind a few years into his
> career. Facts not emotion please.
Again, what facts. "It's been posted". Yeah, more opinions, just like mine.
I watched the game Tommy. I saw Brown play and I saw O.J. play. They were
both great athletes but Brown played on a championship team. No matter how
you twist numbers, no one will call the Bills of O.J.'s time a championship
team.
George
|
56.1243 | I'd still love to have such "nothing" on the Pats... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 06 1994 17:09 | 45 |
|
> Because when I fish out the Globe article that I rem-
> embered the quote reads, "I would like to think we'll see some
> improvement," says Parcells. "But if there is no room for im-
> provement then this is the fastest acceleration to completion
> I've ever seen."
Seems pretty clear to me that Parcells is quite happy with Bledsoe's
physical and mental capacities. The follow-up line from Bob Ryan which
I alluded to was: "This, from *Bill Parcells*? That tells you all you
need to know about how good Drew Bledsoe really is, let alone how good
he will become". So decide for yourself if I'm the only one
supposedly taking Parcells out of context...
> The stupid rules enacted to open up scoring havve the numbers up in
> just about every category. That's not to completely take away from
> Drew because he has been super bt he's not completely *there* yet.
This statement I have no problem with, although I'd point out that even
offensive inflation doesn't detract from the fact that Bledsoe leads
all the NFL in passing yardage (and this isn't stats-padding; without
a running game it has been an absolute necessity). You seem to be
making some progress, though, from "ten-cent head", etc...
> After Faulk's first game against Houston we saw a note posted about
> how close the Pats came to having your dream backfield.
I feel no differently now. In fact, now that it seems that Marion
Butts isn't even a good *shortterm* solution to the Pats' pathetic
running game, the difference between having a player like Faulk or
a player like Willie McGinest is if anything greater (as Nazz also
pointed out). But I'm not blaming anyone for this situation; it's
the coach's and players' duty to try and win ballgames. All I ever
said was that it was somewhat disappointing to miss out on that
possibility.
> Let's just put Faulk's year in perspective - so far he's done nothing.
Sure. He's second in the AFC in rushing if you count his and
Barry Foster's yardage against Houston (Faulk did better), or if
you don't. I guess the final proof of Faulk's inconsequence will
come when he picks up the Rookie of the Year hardware...
glenn
|
56.1244 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Oct 06 1994 17:28 | 25 |
| >> So decide for yourself if I'm the only one supposedly taking
>> Parcells out of context...
You didn't just take coach Bill out of context, you made
up your own quote to suit your own purposes. The line that
was supposed to be the big tipoff for dim bulbs like me, "and
if you don't believe me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself
pretty much says it all" doesn't appear anywhere in the article.
You made that up yourself. Coach Bill said, "I'd like to think
that there's some room for improvement." The rest of the quote
reads to me like if this is as good as he's going to get then
he got there awfully fast. I don't think and I don't think
coach Bill thinks that this is as good as Bledsoe will get.
>> Sure. He's second in the AFC in rushing if you count his and
>> Barry Foster's yardage against Houston (Faulk did better), or if
>> you don't.
Let's look down the list of great AFC running backs. There's
Barry Foster and then there's... Week by week Faulk's yards
per carry average drops.
|
56.1245 | Sheesh, at least be the slightest bit honest and objective... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 06 1994 18:02 | 11 |
|
> Let's look down the list of great AFC running backs. There's
> Barry Foster and then there's...
Marion Butts, good enough for anything the Patriots might need from a
running back over the next couple years? Well, there you have it.
From Barry Foster straight to "nothing", no in between. Hello, goodbye,
Thurman Thomas or anyone else...
glenn
|
56.1246 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Oct 07 1994 10:19 | 20 |
|
>> Marion Butts, good enough for anything the Patriots might need from a
>> running back over the next couple years? Well, there you have it.
>> From Barry Foster straight to "nothing", no in between. Hello, goodbye,
>> Thurman Thomas or anyone else...
Marion has been a bust so far but I'm not convinced that he's fully
recovered from his injury. At least, I hope he has a legitimate excuse.
Thurman Thomas sat out last week with a bum knee and has been knicked
all season. He ceratinly hasn't really had a Thurman Thomas year so
far. Remember after the first game of the season when he racked up
like 4 yards rushing and everyone was wondering what was wrong with
Thurman? Behind Foster and Faulk righ now you have Chris Warren, Johnny
Johnson and Natrone Means. Wheee! All decent backs but just so. Nothing
like the cream of the crop over in the NFC with Sanders, Bettis, Emmitt,
Ricky Watters, etc., etc., etc. At this point, Faulk ranks second over
a fairly mediocre bunch.
|
56.1247 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Oct 07 1994 10:41 | 9 |
| | Marion has been a bust so far but I'm not convinced that he's fully
| recovered from his injury. At least, I hope he has a legitimate excuse.
I'm also convinced that Butts is not 100%. There is no
way that he could be a successful NFL back, leave alone
a star, getting to holes as slowly as he has been this
season.
=Bob=
|
56.1248 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 07 1994 11:21 | 10 |
| Last Sunday on Sports Spotlight they were saying that it's not Butts fault
because the offensive line is not giving him any holes to run through. They
said he is not Barry Sanders who creates his own opportunities but he might do
ok if he had a little running room.
The line seems to do a good job of protecting the quarterback and the runners
are not getting caught behind the line of scrimmage, but every time the reach
the line they hit a wall of people.
George
|
56.1249 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Fri Oct 07 1994 11:26 | 2 |
| Thomas doesn't get mentioned as a great AFC rb?
|
56.1250 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Oct 07 1994 11:45 | 16 |
| re: Pats o-line
I think I've said it before in here. The Pats' blocking
scheme seems to leave some people (linebacker ususally)
on the weak side (where the back is not running)
unblocked. It assumes that the rb will hit the hole on
the strong side faster than the lb can persue and tackle
him. What I've seen of Butts, he is not getting to the
hole fast enough, and the penetration is catchign up
with him.
That's not to say that the o-line is doign well. The
three journeymen in the middle are giving them nothing
much of the time.
=Bob=
|
56.1251 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:12 | 9 |
|
The thing that has most disappointed me abou Butts is that
I don't think that I've seen him break two tackles all year.
I was expecting to see him punish people like...oh, I don't
know...JIM BROWN! but what I've seen is corner backs taking
him down no problem. I've seen linebackers grab him by the
shoulder of his jersey and spin him down like a rag doll.
The holes haven't been there very often but neither has he
run with authority.
|
56.1252 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:26 | 8 |
| The thing they were puzzling over on sports spotlight was whether the
Patriots line was any good or not. They were saying that normally if a team can
protect the quarterback then they should open some holes. And lines that can't
open holes usually get pushed around on pass protection.
But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run.
George
|
56.1253 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:14 | 14 |
| | But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run.
Pass blocking and run blocking are very different, but
they are right, in that if you can pass block, you can
ususally run block.
Pass blocking is generally a matter of picking your man,
and then going one-on-one against him. It is simply a
matter of who is stronger and quicker. Run blocking is
much more tecnique - a matter of getting yourself where
you need to be, and keeping the other team away from the
runner.
=Bob=
|
56.1254 | In other words, San Diego wasn't completely stupid... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:07 | 19 |
|
> I'm also convinced that Butts is not 100%. There is no
> way that he could be a successful NFL back, leave alone
> a star, getting to holes as slowly as he has been this
> season.
Unfortunately, even before Butts got hurt in the pre-season the stated
concern about him was that after 5 full years of constant pounding as a
power back there'd be little left. Call it the Earl Campbell syndrome.
Added to that worry is the fact that he's not that young; he was an
older JC transfer when he went through Florida St. He's probably not
done yet and I'd also like to think that he's going to bounce back
shortly, but I also think that any hope that this guy is going to be
productive in, say, 1996, is a serious wet dream. Which is why this
Leonard Russell thing was not just a straight-up swap (regardless of
whose fault it was; mostly Russell's, sure).
glenn
|
56.1255 | They are differant | CSLALL::BRULE | Whatever you want | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:23 | 27 |
| >> But the Pats seem to protect the QB but can't do anything to help the run.
>Pass blocking and run blocking are very different, but
>they are right, in that if you can pass block, you can
>ususally run block.
>Pass blocking is generally a matter of picking your man,
>and then going one-on-one against him. It is simply a
>matter of who is stronger and quicker. Run blocking is
>much more tecnique - a matter of getting yourself where
>you need to be, and keeping the other team away from the
>runner.
I respectfully disagree with this. Pass Blocking is a lot more
technique and is not always one on one blocking especially with the
interior 3 linemen. (2 guards and Center). When the defenses stunt and
blitz, pass blocking is 90 % zone blocking. It's a much more passive
blocking which the O-linemen very rarely are able to deliver any
physical blows and is mostly technique.
Run blocking is usually one on one blocking with an occasional double team.
It's an aggresive block and much more physical then pass blocking. Your
taught drive the man into the ground and the perfect block is driving
your man onto his back.
Many college linemen come into the pros being able to run block but cann't
handle the pass.
Mike
|
56.1256 | Gotta take the good with the bad with the Big Tuna I quess | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Mon Oct 10 1994 07:48 | 20 |
|
I'm going sit here and wait for Chappy to get in to take my
punishment. I know that comment about mistake on the lake
east was going to bite me in the but. Oh well Pats er...
Parcells choked we lost gotsta pay up.
I'm not one to put blame on any one person for a lost least
of all the coach but what was with the first and goal from
the 4 series? I know he has to build their confidence that
they can run the ball but don't you do that when it is first
and ten from around mid field? After the second Raider penalty
I knew Parcells was going to try to run it in (he was in by the
way) Turner fumbled after extending the ball and landing on Butts
helmet. Just thought a swing pass to Turner was in order.
On a positive note with the execption of the shuttle pas for
the TD the D played all right.
Jerry
|
56.1257 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | Grateful Dead roolz! | Mon Oct 10 1994 08:30 | 3 |
| Turner put the ball over the line. Shoulda been 24-21 NE.
Mark.
|
56.1259 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Oct 10 1994 12:27 | 6 |
| > Shoulda been 24-21 NE.
shoulda, woulda, coulda it still goes down as a loss.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1260 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 10 1994 12:53 | 14 |
|
Two of Bledsoe's interceptions, including the one that was returned
for a touchdown, were the result of his locking on to one receiver.
The other INT was just an ill-advised throw. He almost threw two others,
too. The kid is not a completely there yet, yesterday was all the proof
you could want. But the loss wasn't completely or even mostly Drew's
fault. The running game is beyond pathetic. The officiating stunk.
That *was* a catch and a fumble by Rathman in the 4th quarter. And
for some reason Ray Crittenden has taken it upon himself to start a
small streak of letting the game winning pass slip through his hands.
Yesterday was the second game in a row.
|
56.1261 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Mon Oct 10 1994 13:05 | 16 |
|
Drew had a awful lot of passes deflected or knocked down at the
line of scrimmage yesterday. Anybody else think the Defensive line
is watching to see when he pats the ball? When he does, they jump
because they know he is throwing.
On the interception for a TD, I saw the interview with Bledsoe.
They asked him about it the INT. He said he not only threw it late, but
had no speed on it, and lofted it out there.
Hey, if a team can't score from the 1 yrd line, given 3 chances.
They deserve to lose the game.
In the 4th quarter at the Raider 35 on a 4th and 10 call. Why
the heck did Parcell's punt the ball? The punt goes into the endzone
so it only gained him 15 yrds in field position. IMO, he should have
gone for the 1st down.
Ron
|
56.1262 | They'll be allright | AD::HEATH | Stabler>Grogan>Zolak>Eason>Bledsoe | Mon Oct 10 1994 13:39 | 13 |
|
I too thought the officiating sucked pond water but it went both
ways so you can't use that as an excuse. The Raiders played better
when it counted and that is why they won plain and simple. Next up
is the Jets with a better than even shot at getting above .500.
This game hurt though coulda brought them into a tie for the lead
but we are far from out of it.
Yea as good as I think Bledsoe is and great he will be he has to look
off more receivers than he did yesterday.
Jerry
|
56.1263 | A few serious thoughts..... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Oct 10 1994 14:20 | 28 |
|
Thanks Jerry. :-)
In all seriousness though guys. The Pats are definitely on the
right track. A young team often hits this hurdle, it's when you play
close games against good competition. You got to learn how to win. They
are farther ahead in there 2nd year than I thought they would be.
If fan support stays there and Parcells lets Bledsoe learn from
his mistakes this team could be a SB contender next year. They have got
to abandon the running game though and just try scoring pts against
this sorrier competition...ie NYJ,Cle,Indy,TB,. If they play down to
the competition like they did against Cincy, they will never learn how
to win.
My Raiders on the other hand are at a crossroads. They have got
all the talent there to be a SB contender now, but they keep making
dumb coaching mistakes. I could coach that team bnetter than Shell is.
It showed in the 4th 2nd and 29 and they run the ball? Tim Brown went
ballistic after the play!
I'm glad we played the Pats this year and not next. :-)
Chappy
|
56.1264 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Mon Oct 10 1994 14:22 | 15 |
| As kind of an outsider (ie not a Pats fan), here's my opinion.....
The Patriots have improved a lot from two years ago. They're not there
yet, but they're closer than they have been.
From what little I've seen, Bledsoe is damn good -- and he'll improve and
mature into a fine pro QB. They need a running game, but to me it sounds
like they need a running back -- the line might need a tad of improvement
too, perhaps.
You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might), but definitely
next year for sure....
'Saw
|
56.1265 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 10 1994 16:46 | 5 |
| >> -- the line might need a tad of improvement too, perhaps.
>> You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might),
That's it, Frank. Don't be afraid to take a firm stand.
|
56.1266 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Oct 10 1994 17:02 | 7 |
|
President (cam) WAY
Chap
|
56.1267 | | STAR::MDNITE::RIVERS | ribbit | Mon Oct 10 1994 17:10 | 24 |
| I thought that Pats lost the game for themselves. Their running game
was sooooo poor even the color guy (Marv?) was practically incensed
they tried it at that 4 yard-line touchdown effort. :)
I'm wondering if perhaps they ought to try to run somewhere than the
"make the hole in the middle of the line" -- I cannot recall seeing
much of an effort to run around the outside anytime Butts got the ball.
It also seemed to me that the blocking for the running game is about as
non-existant as the running game.
I do not agree that the Pats should abandon the running game effort
entirely -- a one-trick pony seems easier to defend against. However,
when it was failing them entirely yesterday, especially at the goal
line, Something Else Should Have Been Done.
I hate games like these. It wasn't so much the opposing team was
doing so good to win (the Raiders weren't playing all that well
either), but that they were "less poor" than the loser. Bledsoe was
off. Receivers weren't making catches they ought to. A mediocre game
to be sure.
Cheers,
kim
|
56.1268 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 11 1994 09:47 | 15 |
| | >> You probably won't see playoffs this year (although you might),
|
| That's it, Frank. Don't be afraid to take a firm stand.
Well, it's not an unfirm stand.
I don't think they'll make the playoffs, based on their play and their
talent level, strengths and weaknesses. But I cannot factor in the
possibilities, albeit remote, of a Buffalo or Miami utter and total collapse.
I was just acknowledging that possibility, but I guess I didn't express
it explicitly enough....
'Saw
|
56.1269 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Tue Oct 11 1994 10:07 | 24 |
|
Parcells has got to stop being stubborn. Skene is out for the year
now, give Chung a chance. Parcells has Bob Kratch playing left guard.
Kratch started 6 years at right guard for the Giants. Move Kratch to
his more natural postion on the right side. Put Chung back on the left
side where he was a starter last year. Armstrong and Chung did a good
job run blocking on the left side last year. Put them back togeter and
see what happens. Kratch is more comfortable on the right side. Maybe
putting him over there will open some holes on the right side also.
Parcells needs to be more creative on Offense. Last nights Giants
game was a good example. Reeves calls a QB delay on 3rd and goal from
the 3. Dave Brown goes into the endzone untouched. I'd like to see the
Patriots use a shuffle pass once in a while, maybe a reverse.
On Sunday when they rushed the ball 4 times at the goal line and
didn't score. Hey Bill, Ever think of putting Coates in motion? Your
having problems running. Use your tight end as and additional lead
blocker to gain a couple of yrds. If Coates and Turner can't clear
a path for Butts to bull his way for a couple of yrds. Then they will
never have a running game. Or, maybe try pulling your guard from left
to right and pitch the ball back to Turner. The running game is non
existent because it is just basic bull blocking up front with no
creativity.
Ron
|
56.1270 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | Jerry Garcia is GAWD! | Tue Oct 11 1994 10:11 | 3 |
| Is there a line yet?
Mark.
|
56.1271 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 11 1994 10:13 | 3 |
| | Is there a line yet?
How 'bout "If I could walk like that, they'd put me in irons".
|
56.1272 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Oct 11 1994 10:41 | 4 |
| | Is there a line yet?
How about..."What's a nice thing like you doin' on a girl like this?"
|
56.1273 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 11 1994 14:44 | 1 |
| How about..."I *LOVE* You!"
|
56.1274 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 11 1994 15:02 | 14 |
| Pretty sloppy game all around. The players played sloppy, both coaches
screwed up, the refs made mistakes both ways, I thought I saw a cheer leader
fall down, and rumor has it that even the vendors were dropping hotdogs. Not a
pretty day out in Foxboro.
If it had been a rainy day in November or an ice game in December it might
have made sense but you couldn't ask for a better day to play football.
Still the Pats are an exciting team to watch. They haven't been this much fun
since they were playing in Alumni Stadium and Fenway Park. It's great having
a pro-football team in the area again that really seems to care about winning
football games.
George
|
56.1275 | Had to get the good thing about the raiders in | AD::HEATH | Stabler>Grogan>Zolak>Eason>Bledsoe | Tue Oct 11 1994 15:34 | 15 |
|
Well lets put the bad news behind and concentrate on the Jets this
week. It is a TNT game so the whole country will be (or not be)
watching. I'm expecting a shake up on the O line this week with Skene
gone. Chung will dress this week and a starter next week. His
return will strangely coincide will the return of the running game
and the Pats will be primed for the showdown vs the lowly 'Spots
in Clevescum. I expect the Pats to enact a little revenge on the
thumpin the Jets put on 'em last time they met on Sunday night. Drew
will have another 400 yard day and will be edged out for his 2nd player
of the week honors by an incredible day by Jeff Hostetler who throw for
425 yards and 4 TDS going 28-36 with no picks.
Jerry
|
56.1276 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 11 1994 15:36 | 6 |
| yeah the outcome of last years Sunday night game should give the Pats
some extra incentive this time around. Will most likely be a sloppy
game by both teams.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1277 | I'm pretty happy with this team.... | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Tue Oct 11 1994 18:09 | 29 |
|
As much as I hate to admit it, I agree with Bob Ryan in today's
Globe. The Pats went into the season projected to be a .500 team
by most football watchers. Here the are at 3-3 and as 'Boob' Ryan says
they are "right where the ought to be."
Give Bledsoe a little slack. He's a 2nd year QB who is putting up
extraordinary numbers considering 1) at current point in his career and
2) everybody in the stadium knows he going to throw the ball. The kid
is going to be a little inconsistent at times and make mistakes. Teams
are now changing their game plans to specically deal with him. As a
result the wins are going to get harder now. Again, as Ryan said, he
had an off-day but still managed 321 yards and 2 TDs!!!
As for Parcells, yes he does seem to have a major stuborn streak in
him. I guess he can afford to be a little set in his ways this year.
The team expectations are still being met for this year. and it does
seem to be in his character to to not give up too quickly when things
don't workout as they planned (see Scott Sisson lasted year). But I do
hope he will try something different soon, in his search for a ground
game. I'm hoping that Parcells will use the loss of Skene as an
opportunity to revamp the offensive line. Give Chueng as chance back at
his old position and move Kratch back to the right side of the line.
And giving Croom as shot might not be a bad idea. Who knows....
JimH
|
56.1278 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Oct 11 1994 18:16 | 6 |
| The Pats are right on target for a .500 season. If they had
a coach like DAN REEVES they could win 9-10 games and make the
playoffs, but we got the Big Sardine. Hey things aren't all bad,
at least the cheerleaders outfits are skimpier this year.
/Don
|
56.1279 | sorry you guys didn't beat LA | BSS::MARLAND | | Tue Oct 11 1994 18:40 | 5 |
| All I can say to you Patriot fans is be glad your not out here in
Colorado rooting for the Broncos, then you'd have something to complain
about. I'd also like to say that I think you have one hell of a
quarterback, yea he makes a few mistakes but didn't all the great
ones early in their careers?
|
56.1280 | Reeves sucks you know it | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Tue Oct 11 1994 19:33 | 4 |
|
Ya that genuis Reeves looked great last night hey Slash???????
mike
|
56.1281 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Wed Oct 12 1994 09:44 | 8 |
|
It was good to hear Tagliabue mention "Monday Night Football" and
the Patriots in the same sentence. The only MNF game this year that
has a team that was under .500 last year is the Bears. Who were 7-9
last season. I look for the Pats to play Miami on MNF at Miami.
Somewhere in December so that making the playoffs are on the line.
Ron
|
56.1282 | 24-17 Pats and it won't be that close. | AD::HEATH | Stabler>Grogan>Zolak>Eason>Bledsoe | Fri Oct 14 1994 15:36 | 11 |
|
I just looked at the schedule and see that this is a 1:00 game. I
was all set to put up a fence this weekend. I don't know where I got
the stupid idea they're on TNT. Oh well if I don't finish it by 1:00
I can tell the wife I'm waiting for the cement to set or something.
I expect a good game this week and for the Pats to win by at least
a TD. I also wouldn't be surprised to see Blair Thomas activated for
this game and get about 10-15 plays out of the backfield.
Jerry
|
56.1283 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:24 | 23 |
| The Pats do have a TNT game coming up in a few weeks.
Another scandal is brewing for the Patriots. The woman who ran their cheer
leader squad is bringing a suit against the Patriots for wrongfull termination.
She is claiming that last spring she was ordered by Patriots management to get
Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader type uniforms for the squad and to switch from a
variety of music, including rap, to rock.
The woman claims that when she inquired about why she had to drop the rap
music she was told that the audiences were mostly white. She said that when she
mentioned that not all the players were white she was told that players do not
buy tickets.
The Patriots front office denies that this type of conversation took place
and claims they let her go because she lives in L.A. and they wanted someone
local. They also said that she used profane and vulgar language at times during
cheerleader practice. The woman pointed out that if using that type of language
during practice was really an issue they would have to fire all the coaches
including Parcels.
When it comes to scandal, this team is snake bit.
George
|
56.1284 | A non-issue if I've ever seen one | 24661::LEFEBVRE | Terrapin Station >> Sgt. Pepper | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:33 | 3 |
| The only place at which this issue is scandalous is in the media.
Mark.
|
56.1285 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:33 | 6 |
| re: Cheerleadergate
That was Lisa Coles. She came to the team when her
boyfriend, Hugh Millen was quarterback.
I wondered why she wasn't back this year.
|
56.1286 | TNT Stinks... Come on ESPN | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:38 | 8 |
| I just grabbed the schedule to see when the pats are on the late game
and luckily for me its in the 2nd half of the season so it wont be on
TNT but on ESPN... my lowsy stinkin cable dont get TNT, Just noticed
that TNT has the last game thru WEEK9 then ESPN takes over on WEEK 10
I was hoping TNT would only get 8 games and ESPN 9, oh well I'll only
miss 3 more late games..
mab
|
56.1287 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Oct 14 1994 17:25 | 6 |
| Uh, Earth to MAB:
Games on ESPN or TNT are also shown on free TV in the markets of
the competing teams.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1288 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 16 1994 17:24 | 5 |
56.1289 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Sun Oct 16 1994 21:53 | 13 |
| Really? Who?
Only thing I see in this note for the past few days is a little
chatter about the cheerleader thing.
Tough loss today, another close one. At least they are in each game,
one lucky break and they could have won.
NBC really goofed up, we didn't even see the final field goal. They
must have missed it completely because they didn't even seem to have
a replay.
George
|
56.1290 | Harris showed why he is a practice squad player | AD::HEATH | Stabler>Grogan>Zolak>Eason>Bledsoe | Mon Oct 17 1994 09:41 | 26 |
|
Nobody that I know has jumped of the wagon. So whats the big deal they
played a terrible game and lost big deal. I'm not sure if I'm the only
one but I saw some positives in yesterday's loss. Thomas ran for almost
70 yards and seemed to play with a little fire in his belly give him
some game conditions and he should be able to turn in 75-85 yards a
game and that will take some pressure of the passing attack. The blitz
killed Bledsoe yesterday and with an average running game that would go
away. I'm hoping I've seen the last of Butts he has had ample time to
prove himself and just hasn't stepped up. Time for a change. Rucci did
not seem to play as well as he was hyped (big surprise there) and I sort
of hope Parcells lets Chung outa the dog house and gives him some time
with the #1 offense the next couple of weeks and puts him back in the
starting lineup. Whats the deal with Timpson, they really could have
used him yesterday. When Brisby went down early I new the passing game
would be cooked and it was. Will Mcstooge made a comment about the his
injury early on in the pregame show and said the Patriot medical staff
can't find the problem and made it sound like Timpson just didn't want to
play. Who knows but they need him back. What was the deal with Turner,
he didn't see much action. On one of the 4 and X Bledose hit Gash with
a pass right in the hands which would have been a first down but he did
not come up with the catch. Did he get hurt too? Or just resting him?
Jerry
|
56.1291 | "whimpin out" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Mon Oct 17 1994 10:13 | 11 |
|
RE; What's the deal with Timpson?
According to the Herald this am, he and Parcells had to be seperated at
practice earlier in the week. It kinda sounded like he pulled his
hamstring or groin and told the team it hurt too much to play. The doc stated
it didn't appear to be serious although, the player has to determine
how much pain he can deal with and not the doctor??
sounds like he got p'oed at Bill and said he wasnt gonna play.......
|
56.1292 | Strange game... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 10:51 | 22 |
|
> NBC really goofed up, we didn't even see the final field goal. They
> must have missed it completely because they didn't even seem to have
> a replay.
Yep, they missed it. I still don't understand the FG decision. Both
the announcers at the game and a couple of talking heads I heard on the
radio afterwards were crediting The Great Parcells with this smart
decision to leave time on the clock and "give his team a chance to win"
but I don't see how giving back 35 yards of field position from the
onside kick for the desperation heave into the endzone accomplishes
this aim (yard-for-yard, the field goal is the easier play from 40+
yards out). Not that this was a critical play or anything, but it was
bizarre all the way around.
As for the game, so much for the cliches of a couple of weeks ago
about how "the old Patriots would have found a way to lose this kind of
game". This was as bad as it gets, a major (and somewhat unexpected)
reversion to form...
glenn
|
56.1293 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Mon Oct 17 1994 10:58 | 6 |
|
cause Bledsoe's arm is stronger than Bahr's foot is the only thing that make
sense....
mike
|
56.1294 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 10:59 | 12 |
| I guess the theory was that if they had run a few more plays and scored a
touchdown they would have had to kick off with almost no time left on the
clock. Even if they had recovered the off sides kick they would have been out
of field goal range.
By kicking the field goal then getting the ball back they would have had
about 20 seconds to move the ball a bit then get the touch down. Then they
could have attempted the extra point for a tie or gone for the win.
Either way it was a long shot.
George
|
56.1295 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:25 | 17 |
|
Plain and simple - the Jets threw something at Bledsoe that
he could not handle. The blitzes that the Jets threw at Drew
completely baffled him including the one where Lott was in his
chest as soon as he pulled away from center. Everyone watching
knew Lott was coming and all we could do was helplessly watch it
happen. Just awful. Chalk it up as a learning experience I guess.
And it anyone needs to pointer on just how clueless Bob Ryan is
when it comes to pro football then read today's article. Ryan, who
I guess is covering Bledsoe's butt, dismisses Parcells' notion that
yesterday's game was a *BIG* game. Hey, Ryan! We're 0-3 in the div-
ision now, loser! We'll lose on just about every tiebreaker if we're
in the hunt for a playoff spot! Yesterday's loss was monstrous in
those terms.
Marshall Faulk - 22 carries, 64 yards. Nuff said.
|
56.1296 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:37 | 8 |
| NOBODY was picking up blitzers yesterday. The o-line
hit a new low, and with no receivers, the Pats were
sending everyone out on pass patterns.
The bottom line, as I said all along, is that this is
a ~.500 team, with some talent, but a long way to go.
=Bob=
|
56.1297 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:43 | 26 |
|
> Plain and simple - the Jets threw something at Bledsoe that
> he could not handle. The blitzes that the Jets threw at Drew
> completely baffled him including the one where Lott was in his
> chest as soon as he pulled away from center. Everyone watching
> knew Lott was coming and all we could do was helplessly watch it
> happen. Just awful. Chalk it up as a learning experience I guess.
Care to explain to me why that is Bledsoe's fault (as you seem to
imply, please correct me if I'm wrong) as opposed to the offensive
linemen who didn't bother to block Lott???
You got to give the Jets credit for having an aggresive defensive
game plan. The only other time I've seen the Jets play this year (vs
the Bears) they played the same way. Lots of safety blitzes, plenty of
pressure on the QB. I was especially impressed when the Jets DIDN'T go
the NFL standard useless prevent defense down the stretch. IMHO, that
put the game away for the Jets.
JimH
P.S. anybody hear from JoJ yet????
|
56.1298 | | CAMONE::WAY | Sailors, rest your oars... | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:51 | 13 |
| In Parcells system, if he's using something similar in New England, is that
the RB will pick up the blitzing safety/corner/LB. He has to be able to
read it, and make the decision. No blitz, and he usually either sneaks through
the line into the soft area over the middle, or out into the flat.
Yesterday was a crucial game for the Jets and Pats. Every report I heard
during the past week was that it was critical to both team's playoff hopes.
Bob Ryan (and I haven't read the article), must have his head up his dupa.....
'Saw
|
56.1300 | Half the O hasn't got a clue, if they can even be identified... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 11:58 | 22 |
|
> Care to explain to me why that is Bledsoe's fault (as you seem to
> imply, please correct me if I'm wrong) as opposed to the offensive
> linemen who didn't bother to block Lott???
The postgame observation I heard and agree with is that there were just
too many inexperienced people on the field (you can include Bledsoe,
sure), not the least of which were the WRs who weren't breaking off
their routes, for there to be any kind of option in the approximate
1.5 seconds available against the completely unhindered blitz. I
suppose Bledsoe could have audibled to a running play or screen pass
or something to avoid the beatings, but the 3rd-and-forever game
situations hardly called for it.
The Patriots are in a lot of trouble on offense right now, and
Bledsoe's inexperience is a minor part of it. The O-line is hurting
and hasn't been getting the job done regardless, they're down to
nothing at WR, and the "best" option at RB might be a guy who's played
a couple dozen live downs this year (Blair Thomas).
glenn
|
56.1301 | In the entire scheme of things it's not that big a deal... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 12:03 | 15 |
|
> Yesterday was a crucial game for the Jets and Pats. Every report I heard
> during the past week was that it was critical to both team's playoff hopes.
>
> Bob Ryan (and I haven't read the article), must have his head up his dupa.....
On the other hand, Parcells talks one game (we have to win), and
coaches another (let's beat our heads against the wall with the running
game inside the 10, because we have to make it work sooner or later).
He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
has goals far beyond anything that happens this season. In that
context this game against the Jets isn't a "huge" anything.
glenn
|
56.1302 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 12:33 | 16 |
| I agree with glenn. This team is in building mode and when you consider how
far they've come in the last couple years, they are doing just fine. I don't
think anyone in their right mind expects this team to win any titles. If they
make the playoffs fine but it's unlikely they would get much past the 1st
round.
This game was a good game for the Patriots because it was a chance to go to
the school of hard knocks and see what happens when you don't handle the blitz.
If later this season they straighten that out, then it will have been a
positive and successful experience.
I'm happy about the fact that they've been in each game they've played this
year. They haven't been blown out once. If they keep that up and end up around
.500 then that's fine.
George
|
56.1303 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 17 1994 12:47 | 16 |
|
>> He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
>> has goals far beyond anything that happens this season.
In all honesty, I think that is really stating the obvious. No one
realistically expects the Pats to go to the SB *this* season. That
is an eventual goal. But the playoffs were/are a realistic expect-
ation this season and a win yesterday would have been a big step in
that direction. The goal I think for this season was to continue to
make the transition towards the type of team that wins the critical
games. That we couldn't win a critical game, I think is rather huge.
Ryan's premise is that we still have nine games to go *this* season
so we can make up for yesterday's loss. Again, in terms of this season,
it was a huge game. It made us 0-3 against the division.
|
56.1304 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:37 | 44 |
|
>You've got 7 men coming and only 5 offensive linemen. The linemen
>can't block everybody given the play called.
Plus two running backs, who would be responsible for
picking up blitzes on passing plays, most of the time.
>.....One of the rushers is
> coming right in your face, you see him, you know he's coming but
> you're like a deer caught in the head lights. A veteran QB either
> audibles a quicker play (I wish he would called a QB sneak to the
> left) or he calls a timeout.
Its hard to call a play quick enough to beat a safety
coming through the line quick enough to nail Bledsoe just as he gets
the ball. And a QB sneak is kind of useless in an obvious passing
situation, wouldn't you say. Face it, in the play you site as an
example, Bledsoe didn't even have enough time to turn arround for a
draw play handoff. Yup, you've convinced me, definitely the QBs fault,
even though the safety has to come between two O-lineman who didn't
even try to slow the guy down... A couple of weeks ago you were
Bledsoe's case about squandering precious Time Outs. Now what do you
want hime to do, call a TO every time a Safety shows a blitz???
You also used the term "veteran QB", something Bledsoe is not, in
case you forgot. Yes, he is a young QB and he is learning. As far as I
can remember, this is the first time in his 1 1/2 year career he has
faced a D that can with so many safety and corner blitzes. Lets see how
he adapts his game after a few more time of having his bell rung.
There were many reason why the Pats dropped yesterday's game,
Bledsoe's poor handling of the Blitz is clearly one of them. But I
would put it down the list behind some more obvious reasons (turnovers,
general offensive inconsistenncy, stuborness on the head coach's part,
lack of an NFL quality running game, etc....)
You just don't like Bledsoe, do you???
JimH
|
56.1305 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:45 | 10 |
|
Jets sacked Bledsoe 3 times but they were all in key situations.
The sack by Lott was a timing play on his part, brilliantly executed.
I doubt that more than 2-3 teams in the NFL could have stopped that
particular sack.
Jets are now 3-1 in division, beat Buffalo, Indy, NE, lost to Miami.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1306 | Well, if it was big, Coach should take some heat too then | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:45 | 30 |
|
>> He'd probably never publically admit to it, but I think Parcells still
>> has goals far beyond anything that happens this season.
>
> In all honesty, I think that is really stating the obvious.
It is, but I was applying it specifically to this particular game. I
do believe that on a couple occasions that Parcells finally said enough
is enough, we're going try to run the ball in these goal-line and
not-so-short-yardage situations if it kills us (and it did). Maybe
another way to make the point is to say that if the goal of winning
this game was so big, it was a mediocre effort from the coach, too
[I wasn't commenting so much on Ryan, after reading his remarks his
point is completely different]. Perhaps it's rationalization, but I'm
going the other way and saying that I'm not terribly disturbed by
losing this game if in the process the Pats were able to establish
something new with Blair Thomas, for example.
On a related note, Parcells really is quite insufferable in defeat. He
hates the media and even though it's his employer that's selling these
stupid postgame press conferences to Ch 4, he treats good and bad lines
of questioning with almost equal disdain. I'm still glad he's here
because the most important thing is that he knows what he's doing, but
if you come in as an impartial viewer with no rooting interest
Parcells' attitude pushes you in the opposite direction. No other
coach could get away with such arrogance (and I'm generally
anti-sports media, but this guy is way out there sometimes).
glenn
|
56.1307 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:51 | 23 |
|
>> And a QB sneak is kind of useless in an obvious passing
>> situation, wouldn't you say. Face it, in the play you site
>> as an example, Bledsoe didn't even have enough time to turn
>> arround for a draw play handoff. Yup, you've convinced me,
>> definitely the QBs fault, even though the safety has to come
>> between two O-lineman who didn't even try to slow the guy down...
Er, since when is 4th and 1 an "obvious passing down"?
>> A couple of weeks ago you were Bledsoe's case about squandering
>> precious Time Outs.
Wrong again. I was on his case for calling a timeout at the very
beginning of a quarter. I still think it's stupid.
>> You just don't like Bledsoe, do you???
I like Bledsoe just fine. I'm just not as compelled to make up
excuses for him.
|
56.1308 | no sweat | BSS::MARLAND | | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:55 | 1 |
| The pats will beat the Jets in NE.
|
56.1309 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Oct 17 1994 13:58 | 4 |
| Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun? Did Simms
when Parcells was at NY?
Jimbo
|
56.1310 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:00 | 3 |
| Simms did.
brews
|
56.1311 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:08 | 13 |
| I'm not convinced that Parcells is arrogant or hates the Media. I think
he's just lousy on TV. He was pretty bad as a commentator as well. When ever he
gets on camera in front of a mic he just freezes up. No big deal, the only
thing that matters is how he does running the team and there he's done really
well by winning with the Giants and taking the Pats from no where to .500 in
a couple years.
As for the record, I doubt if they are even considering the division race
so the 0-3 record in the division is not important. Their 0-4 (or is it 1-4)
record in the conference and the head to head loss to L.A. are probably more
important if they are thinking about that last wild card spot.
George
|
56.1312 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:09 | 9 |
| | Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun? Did Simms
| when Parcells was at NY?
I was surprised by that too, Jimbo. The shotgun probably would
have helped Bledsoe see the blitz coming. It's probably a case
of "lets not hit the young guy with too many complicated things".
=Bob=
|
56.1313 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:12 | 1 |
| At least they've won more games than the Cards.
|
56.1314 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:13 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1309 by BIGQ::MCKAY >>>
> Anyone know why Bledsoe never throws out of the shotgun? Did Simms
> when Parcells was at NY?
Up until yesterday getting back and having time to throw wasn't a problem
so they didn't need the shotgun. It remains to be seen if it is going to be
a problem or if they can get around it with a few adjustments.
I'd rather see the Pats stop the Blitz by developing a running game rather
than going to a shotgun.
George
|
56.1315 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:42 | 6 |
|
Pats running, especially in those 4th and short plays was pretty bad.
Not sure why Parcells only tried a pass once in that situation.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1316 | Stinkin' to high heaven.... | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Oct 17 1994 14:48 | 20 |
|
Was that play a 4th and 1? If so than yes, obviously it would have
been a good call. Point taken...
>I like Bledsoe just fine. I'm just not as compelled to make up
>excuses for him.
And where did I make any excuses for him???? I simply
tried to point out there isn't much any QB can do about an untouched
safety. I'm sorry, but if "everybody" in the stadium could see Lott
was about to bliltz, then that includes the O-linemen that Lott is
right in front off. They have to do something to prevent unhindered
access to the QB. No excuses for Bledsoe on my part, I just like to
spread the blame arround to all the guilty parties, not just the most
obvious one. If Bledsoe was like a "deer in the headlights" then the
Offensive line were "dead skunks in the middle of the road."
JimH
|
56.1317 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 17 1994 16:50 | 12 |
| >> And where did I make any excuses for him????
Pretty much all of .1304, up to and including the part
where you erroneously called 4th and 1 an "obvious passing
down and the part where you ever so sarcastically remark
"Now what do you want hime to do, call a TO every time a
Safety shows a blitz???", is one big long excuse. It's
Drew's responsibility, not the left guard's not the head
usher's, to recognize and adjust the play to the blitz
OR call a timeout if he feels there isn;t time to adjust.
He didn't. Period.
|
56.1318 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 17:31 | 19 |
|
> It's Drew's responsibility, not the left guard's not the head
> usher's, to recognize and adjust the play to the blitz
> OR call a timeout if he feels there isn;t time to adjust.
> He didn't. Period.
Are we talking about one play here, or the Jailbreak at San Quentin
scenario that persisted for much of the second half? Bledsoe made
some mistakes, certainly, but at some point no matter how long you
defer the responsibility with timeouts or audibles someone is going
to have to pick up the pass rush with honest-to-god pass blocking on
obvious passing downs. There were plenty of those situations where
it didn't get done...
Let's face it, the O-line's pass blocking was terrible. That's not
an excuse, it's a fact.
glenn
|
56.1319 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Oct 17 1994 17:40 | 28 |
|
Yes I admitted my mistake about 4th and 1. Sorry, I listened to the
game on the radio, so I'm having trouble relating the play you
described to what I heard on the radio.
BTW, I did read a pretty good description of the play in Ron Borges
article in the Globe. He pretty much lays the blame at the feet of
Kevin Turner on that particlar play. "...Lott beat the Patriots on a
blitz and sacked Bledsoe after both Kevin Turner and Leroy Thompson
were unable to block him. Turner's job was to go in the flat, but Lott
came open so quickly between Todd Rucci and Pat Harlow that he should
have forgotten that assignment and stopped Lott. Instead he threw and
arm in his direction and drifted out into the flat..."
So while an aubible or a TO might have been called for, it wasn't
neccessary. If Turner had picked up the blitz, as he should have, it
was "his responsibilty, not Bledsoe's, not the head usher's, his. He
didn't. Period."
No excuses for Bledsoe, just an observation that there were other
Patriots who could have done a better job of protecting the QB. You
fail to recognize that fact in your witch-hunt of a young developing
QB.
JimH
|
56.1321 | Most embarrassing play in football... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 17 1994 18:19 | 17 |
|
> Glenn - Turner, Thompson and a few others are quoted today as
> saying that they had a hard time recognising the blitz. I can't
> fault the o-line. The backs have to pick up the safety or the cb
> when they come loose like that and more often than not they didn't.
That's reasonable. I was just lumping the pass-blocking RBs
into the statement. And Bledsoe had a very rough day, too.
For starters, that fumbled snap on the first play from scrimmage had
nothing to do with defensive pressure but was every bit as damaging
as any fumble or sack forced by the blitz. I thought for sure we'd
hear from you about Bledsoe lining up under the guard in the final
seconds, too, but I think by that point Bledsoe was practically in a
coma (as were you?) ;-)
glenn
|
56.1322 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Oct 17 1994 18:30 | 27 |
|
> Jim, ball-busting aside, I read that Borges article and I
>tend to disagree. What I remember, through a Samuel Adams
>induced haze, was that Lott was on Bledsoe as he was pulling
>away from center. Turner didn't have time to react. No one
>really did. Lott was quicker off the snap even than the Pats
>offensive line. How he anticipated the snap count only he
>knows.
Yes, I'm kind-of interested in finding out if the photo on the
front of the Globe Sports section is from that play. (Turner looking
for somebody to block while Lott hammers Bledsoe)
On the radio broadcast, the annoucers were commenting that the Pats
had been going with a 2-count on most snaps. During one offensive
sequence, the Jets were offside two consecutive plays simply because
the snap count was greater than 2. I don't think there was any rocket
science on the Jets part.
Also, like Glen I'm surprised the Bledsoe over Left Guard wasn't
brought up today. He must have been in a major league daze by then!!!
JimH
|
56.1323 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Oct 17 1994 18:34 | 6 |
| The conscutive off-sides by the Jets were on the Pats offensive
series immediately following Lott's sack. Came in a situation of
3rd and short.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1324 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 09:23 | 5 |
|
Also Lott could have been using the game clock for help. If it's down to
a few seconds chance are you can hit the snap correctly.
mike
|
56.1325 | " | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:27 | 9 |
|
Well, I dunnoo, was he off sides??
I thought he was off sides. I mean, the guy was already three steps
in the Pats backfield before anyone knew it. I don't think Bledsoe
could have taken more than a step and a half back when he got his bell
rung.
|
56.1326 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:34 | 7 |
|
> Well, I dunnoo, was he off sides??
most certainly not.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1327 | | PTOS02::SCHRAMME | The STONES are in town, the STONES are in town!! | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:52 | 5 |
| how is Leroy Thompson doing? is he playing alot? man, I am one of the
few who still wishes he was a Steeler (especially with Foster out for 3
weeks).
Eric
|
56.1328 | Pats have too many Penn State guys in their offense... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:20 | 10 |
|
> how is Leroy Thompson doing? is he playing alot? man, I am one of the
> few who still wishes he was a Steeler (especially with Foster out for 3
> weeks).
He's looked very mortal without a topnotch O-line like the Steelers'
in front him. I thought he was better than this; I really did.
glenn
|
56.1329 | Figures there on a bye this week, NOt a great weekend | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 19 1994 11:55 | 31 |
| Cleveland may have just landed the Biggest break of the season, foster
is out 3 weeks, so dont tell me this wasnt a big game for NE, the 3rd
place WC team plays the 3rd place Division winner (Correct) this could
be cleveland and the pats would have a shot a beating cleveland.
Pitt without foster is in danger, they could lose the next 3 games
without him and then when he returns they have Buffalo, Mia, Rai as
well has Phil and SD down the stretch, cleveland over the next 3 weeks
could all but clinch the division (And Likly will end up playing the
3rd place WC team in the first round)....
I dont think anyone is jumping off the patriots band wagon, well see
how many NO SHOWS there are for the games and how the TV ratings do.
The next 3 home game Miami, Minny and SD are all sold out and should
get great ratings (WIn or Lose). Everyone has Higher aspectations for
there team then what they KNOW in reality more then likly wont happen.
So what, the pats need to improve, thats 6 or more win this season,
anything over that is Gravy, a Playoff game would be nice but isnt
necessary for them to have a Successfull season. Of course it would
have been nice if there rookie WR Lee was in there gaining experience
as well as Hawkins (building...). I think there giving up on Chung
too early as well, he's young and can do the job, if where building
this is not a guy to give up on...
They should be using Croom/Turner more, but isnt Thomas a young player
as well... The WR's will get healthy over the next 2 weeks and NE gave
Miami a damn good game in there first meeting so things could still get
intresting...
Hay this is alot better then watching all those missed FGs..
mab
|
56.1330 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Wed Oct 19 1994 11:58 | 3 |
| Watch for John L Williams and Bam Morris to pick up the slack. I
don't think it's as disasterous as you make it out to be...
|
56.1331 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Thu Oct 27 1994 15:11 | 2 |
| Someone give Doc a hard time for the Vikes-Pats game...
|
56.1332 | Gruesome... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:21 | 22 |
|
Well, before Tommy gets all wound up again, Bledsoe stunk yesterday.
Probably his worst game as a pro, all things considered. Then again,
everyone else on the Pats looked like they were sleepwalking, too,
even Ben Coates. And Parcells too. I don't know what's happened to
Parcells but he's doing some things I'd have never expected from him,
and it's not as if that unpredictability is paying off. That gamble
to pull out the stops in his own territory with a minute to go in the
first half seemed ill-advised, and he (or the defensive coordinator)
was burned badly with the blitz call that effectively clinched it for
Miami in the second half. But foremost among the difficulties is the
total abandonment of the running game. It just seemed like once again
it was make a token effort with a few carries and then shut it down,
even when the game was fairly close. Is Blair Thomas back in a
doghouse again?
I still think that even though the Pats could be playing much better,
there's a significant talent shortage on the squad. There are a lot of
holes, especially on offense...
glenn
|
56.1333 | thank God I didn't pay for the tickets!! | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:36 | 10 |
| It was a nice fall day in Foxboro.....
Other than that I can't think of anything positive to say about
the football game I watched.
I spotted Slasher ogling the cheerleaders, but couldn't find Denny.
billl
|
56.1334 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:52 | 20 |
| It appears that more blitzing is going on during Patriots games on both sides
of the line. The Patriots are blitzing which has helped their pass defense but
the down side is that Bledso is getting blitzed himself and he's not handling
it well.
Sounds like rookie problems. Well maybe sophomore slump is more appropriate.
I'm not ready to jump off the band wagon yet, I think that Bledso has the
talent and will learn how to keep from telegraphing passes to the defense and
how to find open men after scrambling a bit. He's got the basics and is good
if he can keep his timming, he just needs more experience at improvising.
This was the 1st blowout and they were still within 20 points and probably
could have scored late in the game if Parcells had not decided that it was more
important to take Bledso down a couple notches by sitting him on the bench.
They'll be back. Who knows, maybe they will surprise the Browns next week.
Still a fan,
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1335 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 10:46 | 2 |
| My prediction isn't looking too good right now. Pats and Cards both
have 3 wins.
|
56.1336 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:02 | 18 |
| That loud thud you heard around 7:30 last night was the sound of
Volvos and BMWs driving off the bandwagon. I figure there will be no
traffic jams around Foxboro for the two December games with the Colts and
Jests. The Dolphins beat the Pats with a varation of two basic plays.
Parmalee run and pass to Byars. How many times can a team run the same
play before the Big Sardine makes an adjustment to stop it? The only
highlights of the game were the referee getting conked on the head with a
pass and the guy with the lime green disco shirt getting the snot beat out
of him in the endzone near our seats. Hey Billl, if you go to any more
games don't look for us in Kritzy's parking lot because they joined the
legion of independent lots who have raised their prices to $15.00. Much as
it pains me I'll pay $10.00 and make yet another donation to Kraft. My
guess is that the team owned lots will avoid the public relations disaster
and not join the other greedy !@#$%^ in the $5.00 increase *this* year. Mr.
Macorini & Cheese will raise the prices *next* year and claim the increase
is necessary to improve the team.
/Don
|
56.1337 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:09 | 7 |
| One more thing. I really wished the Pats would've raised their
hands Roberto Duran style, cried "No Mas" and walked off the field
about halfway through the third quarter. If you're going to quit,
really QUIT. That way we all could've got home in time to see Married
with Children.
/Don
|
56.1338 | Was that black shirt a Raiders shirt? | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:23 | 19 |
| >>The only highlights of the game were the referee getting conked
>>on the head with a pass and the guy with the lime green disco
>>shirt getting the snot beat out of him in the endzone near our
>>seats.
Saw the first one. Was watching through the binoculars and
the ref in question was laughing his butt off afterwards.
>>Hey Billl, if you go to any more games don't look for us in
>>Kritzy's parking lot because they joined the legion of
>>independent lots who have raised their prices to $15.00.
Now you tell me. We got there around 11:30 and feasted
mightily. Why wouldn't the stadium lots have taken advantage
of the folks driving up and down route 1 and opened their
gates before 1pm?
billl
|
56.1339 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:38 | 11 |
| Billl, we got there around 12:15 and the Stadium lots were open
then. I heard that it's the State Police call as to when the lots
can open. After the game Denny wanted to watch that stupid 5th
Quarter show. There was The Big Sardine on the podium whining away.
Well I had to go relieve myself and when I got back I see this big
hairy Homer lookalike ape on the television screen. It took me
five minutes before I realized they had changed the station to watch
the Simpson Halloween show and that it was not Parcells at the press
conference.
/Don
|
56.1340 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:56 | 4 |
| With all the talk I heard about Bledsoe's brother (who was in
the lux box with Kraft), maybe he shoulda played.
Scott
|
56.1341 | Rollward, Slash! (I'll take your Colts tickets... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:04 | 1 |
|
|
56.1342 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:20 | 4 |
56.1343 | Walsh/BYU | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:29 | 7 |
| Groaner,
The sleeper in this draft looks to be that Walsh kid from BYU. He's
getting a lot of ink locally with the Panthers talking about using one of
their firsted round picks for him.
TTom
|
56.1344 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:49 | 13 |
| � -< Was that black shirt a Raiders shirt? >-
No, it was an "I Survived Spooky World" shirt. If you can survive
the Patsies, Spooky World is a snap.
� -< Rollward, Slash! (I'll take your Colts tickets... ;-) >-
Sorry Glenn, but I'm still going. I've seen it much worse than it
is now in the Big Toilet on Route 1A. You may want to try that new
notesfile YUPPIE::PRETENTIOUS. My guess is that you can get Colts tickets
there pretty cheap.
/Don
|
56.1345 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:09 | 1 |
| ASU spanked Walsh and his Cougars!
|
56.1346 | Big petted lips | PAKORA::DWALLACE | Heid fu 'o' slammin doors | Wed Nov 02 1994 16:39 | 4 |
| Wouldn't get too enthusiastic about spanking Bledsoe's arse - wasn't
Timpson & Brisby sidelined ??
Davie.
|
56.1347 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Wed Nov 02 1994 22:46 | 3 |
56.1348 | read Chung will start | AD::HEATH | No please not Kevin Kennedy | Thu Nov 03 1994 07:27 | 6 |
|
We all still here. We ain't gone anywhere. Only thing is I'm waiting
for the Big Tuna to annonce his big moves.
Jerry
|
56.1349 | Song of the day: Changes | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Thu Nov 03 1994 10:34 | 9 |
| Turns out that the big "change" that Parcells made was to ban the press
from practice this week.
He then said "I just said 'changes would be made, not what changes'.
You guys assumed and wrote players would be cut".
This is sort of a Lusitania sinking in terms of the all out
press-Parcells war on the horizon. Given, the slack they gave him I'd
look for a lot of venom when they finally go after him.
|
56.1350 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death where is thy sting? | Thu Nov 03 1994 11:13 | 16 |
| > This is sort of a Lusitania sinking in terms of the all out
> press-Parcells war on the horizon. Given, the slack they gave him I'd
> look for a lot of venom when they finally go after him.
Somehow, I don't think that the Boston media is quite as horrific as the
New York media, and Parcells handled them okay.
I heard part of his press conference last night. He doesn't have a helluva
lot to work with, but knowing Parcells, I'll bet whatever changes he
makes -- might not be personnel, he just might go nuclear on the team
at practice this week -- will help.
'Saw
|
56.1351 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Nov 03 1994 11:26 | 11 |
| Re where are the Pats fans?
Groaner knows Pats fans are here, have been here and will continue
to be here no matter what happens. That question is just some pre-
game woofing on his part. To his credit, he did finally muster the
nerve to show his face here immediately after yet another Browns
loss to Elway and the Donks. If the Pats should win Sunday (not
likely) I'm sure he'll crawl back in his burrow and emerge three
months from now with his old standby of being overly busy.
|
56.1352 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Thu Nov 03 1994 11:38 | 6 |
56.1353 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Nov 03 1994 11:49 | 8 |
|
The Browns are an 8 1/2 point favorite and it probably
won't even be that close. There's a growing school of
thought that teams now have the book on Bledsoe and can
(and have) effectively neutralize him. Cleveland certainly
has the personnel to pull that off. The one saving grace
for Pats fans is that the Browns aren't all that much better
off at QB.
|
56.1354 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Nov 03 1994 11:53 | 17 |
|
>> Somehow, I don't think that the Boston media is quite as horrific as the
>> New York media, and Parcells handled them okay.
The Boston media might be worse in some aspects than the New York media.
It ain't as large but neither are there as many teams and allegiance to
that single team in that single sport is much stronger up here. To coach
in Boston is to coach in a fishbowl. Ask anyone who has ever managed the
Red Sox. His handling of the press after announcing that changes would
be made is almost as bad as some of the personnel decisions that he's made.
He gave me and just about everyone else up here the impression that some
truly drastic changes would be made. Now, he's backing off probably be-
cause he doesn't have the personnel to effect any meaningful change. Half-
way through his second season and already his act is a little tiresome.
|
56.1355 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death where is thy sting? | Thu Nov 03 1994 12:04 | 18 |
| Well, I don't expect much out of them this season. Parcells has got to
feel the same way.
They have no running game to speak of, and if teams have Bledsoe's number,
it's because he's passing so much.
I'd bet that he's working with "attitudes" this week, more than "changes".
He's "changing" some attitudes.
I've told the story of what he did to Jim Burt one afternoon, because he
didn't like his attitude, and I'd bet a few of the Pats might be feeling
that.
I'll probably watch the Pats game this weekend, since the Jints are on
Monday night.....
'Saw
|
56.1356 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Thu Nov 03 1994 12:28 | 4 |
56.1357 | Speaking of "attitudes", Parcells' has been the biggest... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Nov 03 1994 12:37 | 20 |
|
> Well, I don't expect much out of them this season. Parcells has got to
> feel the same way.
>
> I'd bet that he's working with "attitudes" this week, more than "changes".
> He's "changing" some attitudes.
I don't have a real problem with Parcells closing off practices this
week. That's exactly the kind of thing that bothers a self-important
media the most, any restriction of their god-given right to hang with
the team. That still doesn't change the fact that in many instances
with no apparent provocation Parcells has behaved like a jerk, where
he just absolutely cannot be questioned on any legitimate matter of
coaching or strategy, none. I don't know if he was this bad in New
York or not but believe me if the Pats continue in this mode and don't
improve with a winning season by say next year, these Boston guys will
be ruthless, with a vengeance.
glenn
|
56.1358 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Nov 03 1994 12:47 | 8 |
|
re last
Gee, that sums it up just about perfectly.
re Groaner
You're right. I was looking at Sagarin's line. That's 8 1/2.
|
56.1359 | take the 'spots! | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Thu Nov 03 1994 12:52 | 6 |
| >> The Browns are 3 point favorites, not 8.5.
I don't know where you saw that, but if I was a betting man....
billl
|
56.1360 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Nov 03 1994 13:21 | 3 |
| Iceman aka Groaner, Pats will win outright. I don't do p-names!
Jimbo
|
56.1361 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Thu Nov 03 1994 15:47 | 4 |
56.1362 | finally a main speaks up | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Nov 03 1994 15:51 | 7 |
| Hey Paul, I'll take your bet. give me the Pats and the points.
It's funny how someone in Phoenix has to keep coming through for these
Boston feigns. First the Celtics' conference, not the Pats-Browns
game.
Mike
|
56.1363 | How can anyone predict the Pats | 25022::BREEN | | Thu Nov 03 1994 15:59 | 8 |
| Exactly; we don't have a lot of confidence in an erratic qb and an
erratic coach. We've nothing to boast about; perhaps we have a not
unreasonable hope in the future but right now we can just be pure fans.
But I have nothing against Cleveland, I'd be dishonest to rag on them.
But I'd be a little concerned about just how good they are.
Teams I don't like are Miami, Denver and Giants.
|
56.1364 | no points! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Thu Nov 03 1994 16:03 | 33 |
56.1365 | | 25022::BREEN | | Thu Nov 03 1994 16:04 | 3 |
| See I've nothing against Dawgs so nothing to lose or gain.
I think pats may rebound thought this week (see pool_94)
|
56.1366 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Nov 03 1994 16:30 | 1 |
| Add me in Paul. I'll take the Pats straight up.
|
56.1367 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Thu Nov 03 1994 16:59 | 9 |
|
For some strange reason, I too think the Pats are going to rebound
this weekend and beat Cleveland.
Add me in to the Cleveland Pname bet!
JimH
|
56.1368 | Pats Ryp the cack out of Cleveland | PAKORA::DWALLACE | Heid fu 'o' slammin doors | Thu Nov 03 1994 18:01 | 7 |
| re: .1361
Mark Rypien...hah ! He couldn't guide his pecker thru his flies !
Pats to win.
Davie.
|
56.1369 | Hurt or Help? | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Nov 04 1994 08:04 | 12 |
| Bill Parcells is in the hospital this morning.
He suffered from severe dizzy spell last night, and was kept overnight for
observation. They will be running tests today to see when he'll be released and
if he can make the game this week.
First Coach Mac, now Parcells. This team will break any coaches heart!
zamboni
As an aside, the guys on the radio commented that it could have nothing to do
with his awesome slim shape he is is now!
|
56.1370 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Fri Nov 04 1994 08:05 | 2 |
| WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that coaching the
New England Patriots can be hazardous to your health.
|
56.1371 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death where is thy sting? | Fri Nov 04 1994 09:01 | 4 |
| Well, Parcells does have a heart condition, and perhaps that could be
what this is about, I don't know.
I hope he's okay.....
|
56.1372 | Whats the problem??? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Nov 04 1994 10:04 | 11 |
|
I don't understand what the problem is here.......I get dizzy every
once in awhile (after trips to the bar) and the only thing I have to do
is get in bed. Boy, just think, if I went to the hospital every time
I got dizzy..... ;-)
What a bummer though...now the Pats will be playing this weekends
game "for the coach".
WOOF!
|
56.1373 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 10:07 | 6 |
56.1374 | shades of last week | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Nov 04 1994 11:14 | 1 |
| C'mon Paul, don't start hedging on us already.
|
56.1375 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 14:20 | 6 |
56.1376 | pats looked real bad (AGAIN) but cleveland wasnt much better | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:34 | 16 |
| Well ONCE again the refs decided the outcome of the game...
Pats lost for 2 reasons, BLedsoe/Refs. You cant throw 3 Interceptions
and 0 td's and ever expect to win a game, and nothing takes the wind
out of the defense more then a bad call that lands the offense on the
1yrd line.
The defense just about gave up after that and bledsoe still could pass
anything...
I have a hard time beleiving that all this HORRIBLE play can have
anything to do with them just missing BRISBY.... Yes when they were
missing there #1 and #2 WR you can write that game off as a loss but
when your only missing your #2 guy you better be able to recover...
mab
|
56.1377 | | CAMONE::WAY | Take me, subcreature! | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:36 | 15 |
| I still can't get over the poor quality of the officiating this season.
Bad calls abound -- can it be that they ain't used to the new rules yet
and are hesitating? No, I don't think so, because they seem incapable of
getting it right when they make the calls.
Jerry Seeman is standing by his guys saying that he's totally pleased
with the overall quality of officiating.
I can't remember a season with so many bad calls, and this season ranks
up there with the last year of replay, which I've termed the season
of the non-call -- ie. don't call it, we'll let replay decide.....
'Saw
|
56.1378 | "no hands" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:07 | 8 |
|
Yes Bledsoe had another mediocre performance yesterday! However,
their receivers were pathetic. I could not believe how many DROPS
they had. You can't win games dropping balls left and right!!
This team is in need of a top notch wide receiver. Among other
things. Still a dy-hard Pats fan!
|
56.1379 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Nov 08 1994 08:49 | 3 |
|
This mornings paper said that New England receivers dropped 8
passes.
|
56.1380 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Nov 08 1994 11:51 | 5 |
| I thought the Big Sardine said the Patriots were all set at
wide receiver? I guess when you don't have LT to bail you out of
poor coaching decisions, winning football games is a little tougher.
/Don
|
56.1381 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:05 | 3 |
| Boy, it sure was a smart move getting rid of Russell and Fryar, eh?
Mark.
|
56.1382 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:25 | 10 |
| >> I thought the Big Sardine said the Patriots were all set at
>> wide receiver? I guess when you don't have LT to bail you out of
>> poor coaching decisions, winning football games is a little tougher.
All those Giants "fans" who are raggin' on Big Dan Reeves because
he can't win with a mediocre team and a young, inexperienced QB
ought to take a good look at what coach Bill is doing with essent-
ially the same thing. It's a little easier to be a genius when you
have LT, Carl Banks, Leonard Marshall, Pepper Johnson and the rest of
great great defense and a pretty good offense to go with it.
|
56.1383 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Tue Nov 08 1994 13:22 | 4 |
| Bill's never been the same after the heart operation.....
Dan will *always* be the same -- a loser.
|
56.1384 | Gives Reeves his due | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:11 | 6 |
| Dan Reeves has also had a heart operation. BTW how can a team go from
10 - 6 last year and then 3 - 6 so far this year and the coach get all
of the blame? Parcells is a good coach and so is Reeves. Reeves has
NEVER had the talent defensively that Parcells has had. Defenses win
championships. Whether that is Reeves fault or not is open to opinion.
|
56.1385 | Not that those dopes don't deserve it most of the time | AD::HEATH | Dawgs rule Pats sip | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:13 | 6 |
|
Saw what do you mean he hasn't been the same? Was he at one time
or another cordial to the media and not so thick headed?
Jerry
|
56.1386 | Flip a coin as to where this franchise is headed... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:31 | 18 |
|
In my mind there's still no evidence that Bill Parcells is a strong
talent evaluator, at least of players _before_ they reach his practice
field. I think based on this season's breakdowns you'd now have to say
that overall, the sum total of the last two drafts and off-season
signing periods has been subpar. Contrary to some things I've heard
in here, the football media in Boston continues to cite George Young
as the primary force behind the Giants' drafts (regardless of whether
he has since lost his touch). The Pats' GM role should be considered
something of an unknown and therefore a concern at this point. There's
no reason to panic but a lot of these rough commentaries of "they're on
the right track" should be revealed for what they are: nothing more
than absolute trust in one man (a good man, but still only one man),
not accounting for any specifics. The way it looks now the Pats may
not be on the right track. It could go either way.
glenn
|
56.1387 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:47 | 6 |
| >
> Saw what do you mean he hasn't been the same? Was he at one time
> or another cordial to the media and not so thick headed?
>
I was being facetious....8^)
|
56.1388 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Tue Nov 08 1994 14:51 | 23 |
| There's no doubt that George Young is the "power" in New York Giantsland.
It's in his contract.
Wellington Mara did not want to let Phil Simms go this year, but he
was handcuffed because of George Young.
FWIW, and this is my opinion, George has really started taking himself
too seriously since the last Super Bowl win, and with the changes in
FA stuff recently, the game is swiftly passing him buy.
The Giants did very poorly hanging on to free agents this season.
As to Parcells, I remember his first year in New York and how poor it was,
and how he was at odds with the media and the fans and stuff like that.
Parcells will always be held in high esteem by Giants fans, because of what
he brought to the franchise. But there were a lot of us (me included)
in the first year, who hated his guts...
Dan Reeves....nah, I don't even want to bother....
|
56.1389 | A free Agent WR, and a couple of RBs in the Draft | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Nov 08 1994 15:10 | 30 |
| Yes but if you look at some of the other teams that would be considered
in REBUILDING mode, the pats are leading the way.
Washington-Wasted a pick on a Top Notch QB and there playing there
7th round man, Brooks as a RB stinks even there Kicking
Stinks.
Tampa Bay-Going NoWhere Fast (Alwasy seem to be rebuilding)
Indy-Gained a RB lost there QB (Wont go anywhere without a QB)
Cinncy-Had #1 pick and havnt improved at all
Seattle-Might Be leading NE in rebuilding but had better RB's WR's and
Defense to start with.
Rams-New Orleans-Again always seem to be rebuilding ?
They took a shot on 2 RB's, Thomas and Butts so far both have failed.
They took a shot on NOT going after a top notch WR, at this point it
may have been a good decision becuase having a TOP notch WR this year
may not have doen anything for them. But next year they have to go
after a WR, a Good/Great one. There Defense, DL and OL are improving
Bledsoe will continue to improve (Needs a better QB coach). And
Special Teams/Kicking seem more then adequet.
It wont happen over night (Unless you have a stockpile of draft picks
but no one wants to make the same mistakes Minny did with dallas).
As a Native New Englander Im very Happy with the teams progress, sure
Id love them to rebuild over night and win the next 3 superbowls but
its not gonna happen.... I wish they made more of a move to move up
in the draft last year (And went after Faulk) but hey shit happens.
mab
|
56.1390 | Maybe it's hidden, but I don't see the talent... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Tue Nov 08 1994 15:55 | 22 |
|
> There Defense, DL and OL are improving
Sorry, MaB, but I don't see any improvement _particularly_ in these
areas. Not only hasn't there been improvement but there's been a
backslide, and these were the supposed strengths of the team. What's
a bit scary is that the few top performers (at least before this year)
like Bruce Armstrong and Vincent Brown are getting up there in years,
in football terms. Pat Harlow has had injury problems and is
reportedly having an off year for some reason. The guys whom
Parcells brought in in these departments (some of whom didn't survive)
have been around the block a few times and can only be charitably
described as stiffs. The quality depth is going to have to come
through the draft. And so far the grade there is average, if that,
even compared with what teams like the Colts, Bengals, and Seahawks
have done (I do think those three AFC teams have more overall talent,
even if it is as yet underdeveloped). One or two players a year on
average-- a Bledsoe, a Slade, maybe McGinest by next season-- doesn't
get you there.
glenn
|
56.1391 | Only Time will tell | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Nov 08 1994 16:18 | 29 |
| I think the Defense is improving, they have the talant I dont think
the Defensive Coord is doing his job, when Buddy gets fired next year
we should Hiring him as Def Cord in New England :-)
We have a GREAT LB core and DB/S but the strategy/Defensive scheme is
questionable. The Offense L is banged up a bit and if Chung can get
his act together (He does play OL right) they have some depth as well.
Now why arnt the Pats winning, too predictable, Running Game still
Stinks and Injuries. Take away Coates and Brisby being out disables
the pats from spreading anyone's defense and allows them to BLITZ
more often.. Plus the DB/S are watching Bledsoe (Obvious by his leading
the league in INT's) and when he PATS the ball they make there break
on the WR's. This is youth and coaching... So some Quality time with
a Decent QB coach could help that out.... have you ever seen Bledsoe
Lookoff at a WR's to draw the DB/S and throw the other way (Without
patting the ball ?).
Id say the Goal this year is to hit the 6 win mark and start looking at
free agents. The Draft wont land you anything (Unless you take
chances). Like Draft 4 RB's, the 2nd and 3rd round always seems to
produce 1 or 2 great RB's (Even if most end up being 1 year wonders).
But hey take a shot, the Free Agent RB's will be no better then what
you have now. But I still think they could land a WR next year.
Only Time will tell, but looking around the league I see MORE teams in
worse shape then the pats (Then Teams in better shape).
mab
|
56.1392 | Going 'round in circles | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 08 1994 16:52 | 17 |
|
>> As to Parcells, I remember his first year in New York and how poor
>> it was, and how he was at odds with the media and the fans and stuff
>> like that.
Unfortunately, this is Parcells *second* year and we may be worse
than we were last year. What's worse is that there's no real evidence
that we'll be better next year. If you want to point to any one thing
that made the Giants great it was their talented defense and by most
accounts that wasn't Parcells' doing - it was George Young's. We don't
have a George Young. We have Bill signing Myron "highly flammable"
Guyton and Bill "the swinging gate" Kratch to fat contracts. Bill
may be a great coach and motivator but as a talent evaluator so far
he rates a solid c-. Glenn's right, in that all of our best players
are pre-Parcells and the jury is still out on a few of the young
promising ones. The rest of the team is decidedly mediocre which
is pretty much where we started.
|
56.1393 | 91 results; I'll try for 92 | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Nov 08 1994 18:06 | 21 |
| Here are '91 results
pats
win
01 910901 INDY PATS 07 16 01 00
02 910908 PATS CLEV 00 20 00 00
03 910915 PITT PATS 20 06 00 00
04 910922 HOUS PATS 20 24 01 00
05 910929 PHOE PATS 24 10 00 00
06 911006 MIAM PATS 20 10 00 00
08 911020 MINN PATS 23 26 01 00
09 911027 DENV PATS 09 06 00 00
10 911102 BUFF PATS 22 17 00 00
11 911110 MIAM PATS 30 20 00 00
12 911117 JETS PATS 28 21 00 00
13 911124 BUFF PATS 13 16 01 00
14 911201 DENV PATS 20 03 00 00
15 911208 PATS INDY 23 17 01 00
16 911215 JETS PATS 03 06 01 00
17 911222 PATS CINC 07 29 00 00
------
total wins 06
|
56.1394 | 91 pats results | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Nov 08 1994 18:17 | 19 |
| pats
favorite underdog win=01
(game 1 ????)
02 920913 RAMS PATS 14 00 00 00
03 920920 PATS SEAT 06 10 00 00
04 920927 BUFF PATS 41 07 00 00
05 921004 JETS PATS 30 21 00 00
06 921011 S.F. PATS 24 12 00 00
07 921018 MIAM PATS 38 17 00 00
08 921025 CLEV PATS 19 17 00 00
09 921101 BUFF PATS 16 07 00 00
10 921108 N.O. PATS 31 14 00 00
11 921115 INDY PATS 34 37 01 00
12 921122 JETS PATS 03 24 01 00
13 921129 ATLA PATS 34 00 00 00
14 921206 PATS INDY 00 06 00 00
15 921213 K.C. PATS 27 20 00 00
16 921220 CINC PATS 20 10 00 00
17 921227 MIAM PATS 16 13 00 00
|
56.1395 | What's my point; it got lost | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Nov 08 1994 18:19 | 7 |
| It just seemed that prior to parcells that the Pat's played hard in
some games and key players were same-same as now: Vin Brown, Goad;
More than anything this year they miss Russell big time.
But only the Parcells mystique is saving him from a Berry kind of
mob lynching
|
56.1396 | huh??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Nov 08 1994 19:02 | 6 |
| .1391
How would a pat on the ball tip-off where bledsoe was going to throw.
BTW if the db's are looking at when bledsoe is going to tap the ball...
Wouldn't the wide receivers be wide open? I don't get it....
|
56.1397 | just a though | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Tue Nov 08 1994 19:55 | 7 |
|
If a team's playing a zone defense they're not playing man to man so if you
see him look into your area and then pat I'd say you'd call that a tipoff.
Of course this deals mostly with shorter routes. If a man goes deep you
dam well better be playing the man.......
mike
|
56.1398 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Pres. of Hair-B-Gone Club fer men | Tue Nov 08 1994 19:57 | 8 |
| Was listening to ESPN radio Sunday night and they had Eric Turner of
the Brown(spot)s(tm) on and he said that Bledsoe tends to watch only
his primary receiver. he siad it makes it much easier to get a good
jump on th ball. Couple that with a habit of patting the ball just
before throwing, and it's a DB's feast.
JaKe
|
56.1399 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 08:39 | 13 |
| So it's Parcell's second year, big deal. It's still early, and he didn't
have much to work with when he came in.
He signed players he knew -- most coaches do that -- look at the New York
Broncos.
Regarding Bledsoe looking his receivers, that seems to be a common
young QB problem......(qv Dave Brown)
'Saw
|
56.1400 | the OL has to give them time to check off | FRETZ::HEISER | THE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP! | Wed Nov 09 1994 09:57 | 2 |
| Beuerlein has been dragged through the mud locally because of the same
problem: locking on 1 receiver.
|
56.1401 | -1 | FRETZ::HEISER | THE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP! | Wed Nov 09 1994 09:57 | 1 |
| Re: Pats SNARF!
|
56.1402 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:24 | 13 |
|
I think way too much is being made of this patting the ball stuff.
Looking at his intended receivers all the way, forcing the ball into
double/triple coverage, and nervous feet are Bledsoe's biggest problems
right now.
I just have trouble imagining a pass rusher or a defensive back
being able to contrate on what Drew is doing with his hands, while they
are dealing with offensive lineman and defending pass routes....
JimH
|
56.1403 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:40 | 19 |
| | I just have trouble imagining a pass rusher or a defensive back
| being able to contrate on what Drew is doing with his hands, while they
| are dealing with offensive lineman and defending pass routes....
I dunno about that, Jimmy. I agree that the things you
mentioned are bigger problems than passing that ball,
although the happy feet thang is new. The thing is that
you may be surprised at what defensive players are taught
to key on. I recall some time back reading an article by
Packer linebacker Dave Robinson, in which he said that he
would look at the knuckles of o-linemen in their stance.
If they were putting a lot of pressure on their knuckles,
and they were white, he knew a run was coming (the lineman
would be "firing out"), if not, it was a pass (the lineman
would be giving ground for pass protection). If a linebacker
can get to that level, it wouldn't surprise me if a d-back
would read a ball pat.
=Bob=
|
56.1404 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:12 | 22 |
|
>> So it's Parcell's second year, big deal. It's still early, and he
>> didn't have much to work with when he came in.
Read your comments about George Young and Dan Reeves, for a Bostonian
all of them could apply to Parcells. George couldn't hold onto his
free agents? Coach Bill lost his best receiver and running back to
free agency. I'm not crying because either are gone but the fact is
that they did go and Bill didn't lift a finger to stop 'em. Bill didn't
have much to work with? Take a good look at the Giants. There ain't much
there. You're pretty much where your talent dictates. Dan Reeves is un-
flexible? Bill has him beat hands down in that department. Ain't nothing
Dan could do to match Bill runnning it unsuccessfully 6 straight times
from the four yard line. Dan is 3-6. Bill is 3-6. I don't see a whole
lot of difference between the two.
>> He signed players he knew -- most coaches do that -- look at the New York
>> Broncos.
How man ex-Broncos play for the Giants? Give 'em to us and we'll ship
Kratch, DeOssie and Guyton back.
|
56.1405 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:14 | 22 |
|
>I dunno about that, Jimmy. I agree that the things you
>mentioned are bigger problems than passing that ball,
>although the happy feet thang is new. The thing is that
>you may be surprised at what defensive players are taught
>to key on. I recall some time back reading an article by
>Packer linebacker Dave Robinson, in which he said that he
>would look at the knuckles of o-linemen in their stance.
I certainly wouldn't rule it out Bob, but I still think it would be
difficult to do in practice. The example you site, is something they
look for at the line of scrimmage, before the ball is snapped. Makes
sense. But I have trouble picturing a pass rusher picking up that kind
of detail while trying to deal with a huge O-lineman standing in his
way? (Of course the way the Pats O-line has blocked recently, maybe
that isn't an issue....)
JimH
|
56.1406 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:19 | 10 |
| re: Parcells and his free agents
Well he did knuckle Maurice Hurst under, and got him to
make a long-term commiment to the Pats. The free agents
he lost were not in a bidding war, but they were guys he
didn't want (obvious mistakes in the examples you sighted,
as well as Chris Singleton, who is now starting for
Miami).
=Bob=
|
56.1407 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:23 | 13 |
| > Dan could do to match Bill runnning it unsuccessfully 6 straight times
> from the four yard line. Dan is 3-6. Bill is 3-6. I don't see a whole
> lot of difference between the two.
Bill outcoached Dan in the most important game of their respective
careers.
In my book that will always make Parcells a better coach.
|
56.1408 | Broncos overachieved under Reeves | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:47 | 7 |
| I heard an interesting question on a sports show yeaterday. They
asked if the players on a team or the coach on a team make the biggest
difference of a successful NFL team? I personally think that if you
have the horses you have a greater chance at being successful. Reeves
is a good coach but not a great coach. Every team he took to the
Superbowl was an overacheiving team. He had very little defense and
an offense built around Elway.
|
56.1409 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:47 | 9 |
|
>> Bill outcoached Dan in the most important game of their respective
>> careers.
So the two teams were dead even in terms of talent and Bill's
coaching made the difference? Do you honestly believe that?
|
56.1410 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:55 | 12 |
|
I think Drew Patting the ball before he throws it. Makes a diffence
if you are a Free Safety in Zone coverage. In most Zones the free
safety is the center fielder waiting for the ball. If Drew is looking
left, then pats the ball, If I am the FS I'm going to start running
left.
This could be why it appears Drew is throwing into double coverage.
The guy was open in single coverage. Just that the FS read where he
was throwing and got there about the same time as the ball.
Ron
|
56.1411 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:03 | 12 |
| > So the two teams were dead even in terms of talent and Bill's
> coaching made the difference? Do you honestly believe that?
No, actually, the Broncos had better talent, to the line of 7 points....
|
56.1412 | yeah right | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:09 | 1 |
| Name those great players that the Broncos had on that team????
|
56.1413 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:30 | 16 |
|
> I think Drew Patting the ball before he throws it. Makes a diffence
>if you are a Free Safety in Zone coverage. In most Zones the free
>safety is the center fielder waiting for the ball. If Drew is looking
>left, then pats the ball, If I am the FS I'm going to start running
>left.
Yup, this makes sense. I was thinking the same thing while sitting
here eating my lunch. If you can be watching who the QB is looking at
you can easily pickup the 'pat'...
JimH
|
56.1414 | Maybe I'm clueless | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:12 | 6 |
| I don't know... I think if a guy is looking at the receiver the whole
time during the route; It does not matter if he pats ball, stomps his
foot, point to the receiver, scratch hisself, etc.....You will know
where he is going to throw the ball....
|
56.1415 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:15 | 7 |
|
No, it works like this.....if he pats the ball once, its going to
coats...if he patts the ball twice, its going to Timpson...etc...
Now, if he rubbs the ball................
The King
|
56.1416 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:24 | 11 |
| >
> Name those great players that the Broncos had on that team????
>
Hey, I'm just telling you what the line was. The Broncos were favored
to win by a TD. Everybody thought the Broncos were better than the
Giants....
Players they had who were no slouches were: Elway, Mecklenberg, M. Jackson,
Tom Jackson.... I'd have to go home and look at the tape to come up
with some more....8^)
|
56.1417 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:36 | 15 |
|
Frank, I think you're confused. As I recall the Giants were about a fg
favorite in that game. Afterall they had beaten the Broncos during the
year and were riding a 10 game winning streak. The second Giants'
superbowl win against the Bills was teh game they enter as a 7 point
dog.
Great Bronco players at that time were Maclenberg and Dennis Smith as
I recall. Can't think of any others.
Current Bronco/Giants : Marshall, Treadwell, Deluiso, and Brooks that
I can think of. You can have them all except Brooks for just Kratch
as far as I'm concerned.
mike
|
56.1418 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:44 | 12 |
| > Frank, I think you're confused. As I recall the Giants were about a fg
> favorite in that game. Afterall they had beaten the Broncos during the
> year and were riding a 10 game winning streak. The second Giants'
> superbowl win against the Bills was teh game they enter as a 7 point
> dog.
Could be. Perhaps what was fooling me was all the media hype revolved
around Denver and Elway, and nobody was paying much attention to the
Giants. Perhaps that is why I thought they were the dogs....
|
56.1419 | Broncos (like entire AFC) didn't have the talent; let's face it | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:51 | 9 |
|
Yeah, the Giants had only lost 2 games that year; the Broncos 5.
Considering that this game was at least close until the third quarter
and that Denver then went onto bigger stompings at the hands of
the Redskins and 49ers (for all the same reasons) I wouldn't draw too
many conclusions from this one game.
glenn
|
56.1420 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:05 | 4 |
| Giants were a 9-9� point favorite in the Giants/Broncos Super
Bowl.
/Don
|
56.1421 | Denver did not have the horses | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:19 | 14 |
| On defense there was Dennis Smith and Karl Mecklenburg. The offensive
line was undersized as well as the defensive line. Mark Jackson,
Vance Johnson, and Ricky Nattiel were completely overrated. Jackson
could not catch on with Giants later in career. Johnson could not
catch on with either Minnesota or SanDiego. Ricky Nattiel could not
even catch on with lowly Tampa Bay. The big running backs were Sammy
Winder and Gerald Wilhite. What??? you never heard of thos RB's???
Little wonder...They were average at best. Offensive line had Ken
Lanier and an undersized center. Oh yeah I almost forgot...Denver
also had John Elway. Didn't the Giants have LT, Carl Banks, Pepper
Johnson, Jim Burt, Leonard Marshall, and a Huge offensive line. They
also had Bavaro, Morris, and Simms. Not sure of the Wide-outs but
I'm sure they were not as overrated as the 3 amigos in denver...
|
56.1422 | Joe Morris should have been the MVP that year | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:44 | 10 |
|
Giants wideouts were Manuel, Bobby Johnson and Phil Maconkey.
George Martin was also on the defensive line.
o-line was the Suburbinites: Brad Benson, Bart Oates, Karl Nelson,
William Roberts and ????????
mike
|
56.1423 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:46 | 2 |
|
and the great Harry Carson was an LB back then..........
|
56.1424 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 14:48 | 10 |
| > o-line was the Suburbinites: Brad Benson, Bart Oates, Karl Nelson,
> William Roberts and ????????
Billy Ard.....
|
56.1425 | Dan is pretty good | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:48 | 7 |
| Would it be safe to say that the Giants had much more talent than
the Broncos??? And it could be said that IF the Broncos had somehow
won the game that Reeves would have been the main reason? As it was...
The fact that Denver even made the superbowl tells you alot about
Dan Reeves' coaching ability...
|
56.1426 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:56 | 11 |
| > Dan Reeves' coaching ability...
Dan Reeves is on a par with Dean Smith -- can't win the big one when he
gets there -- BUT WORSE than that is the fact that he is not at all very
good at making midgame adjustments. All the best coaches do that well....
'Saw
|
56.1427 | Dean is in a class by himself | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Nov 09 1994 16:05 | 4 |
| reply -1
Maybe but you have to admit that the talent that Dean has squandered
is much greater than anything Reeves has EVER had.
|
56.1428 | Still hope | 25022::BREEN | | Wed Nov 09 1994 16:54 | 13 |
| I wouldn't pay much attention to comments by opposing players about
"patting the ball" etc; this is just stuff. If they get a real edge
they keep it to themselves. Bledsoe had a full season to reveal
weaknesses and noone took advantage in first four games.
One of the big problems was Parcell's choice to delay developing a
ground game and go for two quick wins via the air. Finally when no
ground game could be established and receivers were all injured the
Pats couldn't even pass the ball.
But if the early success was legit then it could still be repeated.
Last year Pats won last four or so with only one going in. If they
can get to five wins with five games to go...?
|
56.1429 | weal AFC also | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Thu Nov 10 1994 09:48 | 6 |
|
so what was the magic back in Denver, Reeves' great coaching or Elway's
great ad-libbing ability? Also not to be left out of the equation was
the great HFA that pile-it-high afford them.......
mike
|
56.1430 | Dean, Dan: 1-1 | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Thu Nov 10 1994 09:56 | 8 |
| In terms of sqaundering talent, Dean is truly in a class by hisself. To
come up with a team that matches some of Dean's choke jobs, you think of
the 'Skins losing to the Raiders about 10 years back or the Colts losing
to Namath.
In terms of accomplishments, however, Reeves aint on the charts.
TTom
|
56.1431 | They have their own note - use it!!! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:10 | 3 |
| Get this &*($_^)%(* Giants talk outta the Patriots note!!!!
NAZZ
|
56.1432 | back to the original note | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:16 | 4 |
| Okay NAZZ... The pats sip discretely
So do the Broncos and Giants...
|
56.1433 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 14 1994 09:55 | 13 |
| YES!!!!! BIG WIN FOR THE PATS!!!!!
Bledso broke the all time NFL record for passes and completions with 70
passes, 45 completions.
Also, on one occasion he ran a bootleg and threw a touchdown. At least he's
getting out of the pocket.
This team is coming along just fine. Playoffs next year, Superbowl the year
after that.
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1434 | Minny gave the game away... | 56953::HALPIN | Wow!!! 45 & 70 | Mon Nov 14 1994 09:59 | 30 |
|
Pats upset the Vikings 26-20 in OT yesterday.
Vikings lead 20-0 in the first half.
Bledsoe set two NFL records yesterday:
Most pass attempts = 70
Most pass completions = 45
Bledsoe in the 1st half: 8-17, 72 yards, 0 TDs, 0 Ints
In the 2nd half (and OT) 37-52, 354 yards, 3 TDs, 0 Ints.
But as exciting as the game was, I have to say that the Vikings
pretty much GAVE them the game at the end. If I were a Vikings fan I'ld
be screaming for the head of the Defensive Coordinator today!
In the Pats last drive of the 4th period, score 20-17. The Vikings
blitzed 3 straight times. Each time a Viking defender got into the
backfield untouched. Drew just barely got rid of the ball each time.
Then with 4th and 10, THEY DIDN'T BLITZ?????? Guess what, he hits
Brisby for a 25 yard completion and the Pats go on to win the game.
Thank you very much Minnesota, we'll take it....
JimH
|
56.1435 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:14 | 5 |
| The most impressive effort, to me, was the 4th and 10 late in the 4th
quarter that Bledsoe completed to Brisby. Serious gut-check for
Bledsoe after getting hammered 3 consecutive plays in the pocket.
Mark.
|
56.1436 | very disgusted | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:27 | 9 |
| What is it going to take, just what is it going to take for teams to
STOP USING THE PREVENT DEFENSE???
I don't get it, I just don't get it.
Vikes CHOKED big-time. This game should never have been close.
Spud
|
56.1437 | | MKFSA::LONG | Like your freedom? Thank a Vet! | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:47 | 8 |
| This is the second time that I can remember of a Worn Moon
qb'ed team coughing up the old hair ball in Foxboro. The other
one was in 1991, I think, when McMurtry caught the game winner.
I reminded Dr 00:00 of this and have yet to hear a response.
billl
|
56.1438 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:51 | 8 |
| Drew was hammered after at least 85% of the 70 passes he threw
yesterday. This keeps up and he will not make it to Christmas.
Using the no-huddle was a pretty good halftime adjustment by the
Big Sardine, but that no-huddle makes it hard to watch the fights
in the endzone when the Pats have the ball. Vincent Brown had a
very good game yesterday.
/Don
|
56.1439 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 14 1994 13:11 | 12 |
|
At least they finally figured out a way to get single coverage
on Ben Coates. The way it started out, it looked like it'd be
another game with the receivers dropping easy passes, Coates
getting quadruple coverage and Drew looking every bit the rookie.
The adjustment at half-time coupled with Minnesota gagging made
the second half quite enjoyable. As much as Bledsoe's performance,
the performance of the D was specatacular. A solid win but how
long are they going to play this gimmick offense before teams
figure out how to stop it? Sooner or later they're going to have
to learn how to effectively run a conventional offense. Unfort-
unately, they don't have the personnel to do it now.
|
56.1440 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Nov 14 1994 13:32 | 5 |
| Best hit of the game yesterday was the FOX sideline camera truck
ramming into a cheerleader in the fourth quarter. She was a trooper
though and shook it off.
/Don
|
56.1441 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Nov 14 1994 13:43 | 4 |
| | /Don
So I guess youze guys weren't one of the seven who lost
their season tickets for drunken rowdiness?
|
56.1442 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Nov 14 1994 14:06 | 4 |
|
Shame on you slasher. Ida thought better of ya.\
brews
|
56.1443 | Bet the D's not #4 overall this week :*o | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | | Mon Nov 14 1994 14:43 | 13 |
| I have a lot of trouble blaming Moon for yesterday's loss. The defense
plain and simple caved in. They looked lost out there. This should
have been an easy win for the Vikes. You'd think with all the
accolades Dungy gets, they would have adjusted a little better.
Moon's passes were on target. There were a couple of key drops by
Palmer and Ismail that killed drives that could have put the game away.
The Vikes D is vulnerable and the whole league found that out
yesterday. Luckily, they have the Jets at home next weekend.
Spud
|
56.1444 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Wed Nov 16 1994 16:08 | 7 |
| Anybody out there tape Sunday's game. Denny Rieu would like
a copy of it. Unfortunately for him one too many Lite Ices in the
parking lot and one too many freebies at the game left him unable
to remember what a great game it was. I kind of figured when he
almost fell into my trunk that maybe he had one too many.
/Don
|
56.1445 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 21 1994 09:01 | 14 |
| I heard a part of the second half on the radio -- I was going to the grocery
store to pick up a few things. On the way into the parking lot I heard the
Chargers score a TD to pull to within three, 13-10.
Coming out of the store, and pulling onto the road again, I heard it
was 23-10, and I thought, "Wow, the Pats are doing well".
When I got where I was going, I turned on the TV. What a great game by
Chris Slade -- was he playing like a house on fire or what.
Nice effort!
'Saw
|
56.1446 | Sign of the times? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Nov 21 1994 10:02 | 4 |
| Don't think I've ever heard of a guy looking for the video of
a game he'd attended. O brave new world...
Steve
|
56.1447 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 21 1994 15:08 | 8 |
| Big win for the Pats yesterday. The Chargers have been beating everyone
and if the Pats can handle them they can handle anybody.
When they lose the Pats seem to lose because of sloppy play and rookie
mistakes which are things that can be fixed.
Contender next year for sure,
George
|
56.1448 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Nov 21 1994 15:11 | 4 |
| Interesting article in yesterday's paper about Bledsoe. I found it
especially interesting when Parcells claimed Bledsoe has the 2nd best
arm in his family. His 16-year old kid brother sounds like quite the
player.
|
56.1449 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Nov 21 1994 15:13 | 8 |
|
Don't want to rain on your parade, George, but the Chargers haven't
looked nearly as good of late as they did earlier. I think they've now
lost 3 out of their last 4, and a once insurmountable lead in their
division is now one game. Still a good game for the Pats to win, but
it's not like they beat the 9ers or Cowboys.
brews
|
56.1450 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 21 1994 16:08 | 12 |
| Well earlier in the season the Pats beat the Lions after the Lions had beaten
the Cowboys.
Sure, the Pats are not ready yet, but the feeling I get is that their
problems can be fixed and Parcells is a guy who can fix problems.
This is the most exciting time to be a Pats fan since the merger. The '85
Superbowl was a fluke, this team looks like they could be for real.
I'm psyched,
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1451 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Nov 22 1994 15:54 | 6 |
| Pats still need a good wide receiver, a good running back, a
defensive lineman who can pressure the quarterback and a center and/or
guard who can handle the heavyweight nose guards. Don't be shocked
if they lose the the Colts on Sunday night.
/Don
|
56.1452 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Nov 22 1994 17:25 | 1 |
| sounds like almost a whole team.
|
56.1453 | Pats win 12-10 | MKFSA::LONG | Hey N.E., Keep RIGHT except to pass!!! | Mon Nov 28 1994 09:44 | 5 |
| Nice reverse KOD, slasher.
billl
|
56.1454 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 09:46 | 4 |
56.1455 | | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:00 | 8 |
| Welcome home, Groaner.
Word is that Field Service now has a nine-month backlog of requests
for replacements of worn out next unseen keys.
Curiously, most of the requests are from Pittsburgh.
Steve
|
56.1456 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:42 | 8 |
| This is ANOTHER HUGE week for the pats, there are 5 teams at 6-6 all
fighting for a WC spot in the AFC, the NYJ and PATS play each other
and the other 3 (Buffalo, Denver, Raiders) play Better(Record) teams
in (Miami, KC and SD)... The winner of the NYJ/Pats game could have
the edge on the last WC spot as the other 3 6-6 teams could all lose.
(A pats win combined with a Raiders/Buffalo loss would be too much
to ask for :-)...).
mab
|
56.1457 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:59 | 13 |
| Finally a division win!!!
Now the ice has been broken the Pats should pick up a couple more with both
the Jets and Colts at home. The Colts in particular should be frozen solid
by the end of the half.
This is the beginning of something big. The Pats may never have won the
NFL championship but they will.
Did they ever win the AFL championship? Seems they were pretty good back
in those days.
George
|
56.1458 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:02 | 9 |
| > Did they ever win the AFL championship? Seems they were pretty good back
>in those days.
I don't think so, if memory serves me correctly. My football encyclopedia
is at home, but it contains AFL from 1960 through the merger. They did
play for it at least once I think.....
'Saw
|
56.1459 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:39 | 5 |
56.1460 | btw - Why wasn't Brodie on SI's 50 | 25022::BREEN | And what of the shaft | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:41 | 13 |
| They won the AFL East in the snow at Fenway Park then went out to San
Diego and got crushed 50-0 by Lincoln&Lowe etco.
The next year they had only to best the Jets on thefinal day but a
certain rookie qb was not to be denied.
The Pats weren't good but used stunting and blitzing effectively with
Nick Buoniconti at mlb.
Right about this time the AFL saw the merger and started spending the
money to get parity except for Billy who had none. Then when John
Brodie was signed off of the 49ers roster a hasty merger was arranged
with the return of Brodie part if it.
|
56.1461 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:49 | 10 |
| >
> The Pats weren't good but used stunting and blitzing effectively with
> Nick Buoniconti at mlb.
>
I didn't know he played for the Pats first -- they must've traded him
to the Dolphins later.....
'Saw
|
56.1462 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:50 | 5 |
|
Folks, leave Groaner be. The poor guy is still clinging to
a championship that a Cleveland team won thirty years ago
as being the most recent. Just consider yourselves fortunate
that your situation isn't as desparate.
|
56.1463 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 13:32 | 3 |
56.1464 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 14:12 | 2 |
56.1465 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Nov 28 1994 14:19 | 3 |
| They won last night. Beat the Colts with 4 field goals.
George
|
56.1466 | I'll take tha pats over the Browns, one team is on the rise | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 01 1994 15:19 | 14 |
| Ya look at this note CRAWLING WITH bandwagon jumpers after a WIN.. NOT
Pats fans no what they have, they have a great young team that should
continue to grow and provide us with decent competative football over
the next 3-5 years. Will they get to and win the big one, who knows
there's many teams that have never been to the NFL SuperBowl (Including
the Browns) so we can hope but they could lose Bledsoe in what 4 years
(I think he has an out clause somewhere down the line)...THen the run
is over :-(
I will actualy root for the Giants this weekend vs the Browns this
weekend, I may even bet on the browns (That's a proven way to make a
team lose)...
mab
|
56.1467 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Thu Dec 01 1994 15:29 | 3 |
|
You guys have been preachin that Pats are on a rise bs since Moby Dick
was a minnow. When is it going to happen?
|
56.1468 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Dec 02 1994 09:40 | 10 |
| Re <<< Note 56.1467 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "We be the Tools BAT" >>>
> You guys have been preachin that Pats are on a rise bs since Moby Dick
> was a minnow. When is it going to happen?
It's happening. Next year they make the playoffs, the year after that they
win some playoffs, the year after that the superbowl.
GO PATS!!!!!
George
|
56.1469 | long term | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 10:47 | 7 |
| > It's happening. Next year they make the playoffs, the year after that they
>win some playoffs, the year after that the superbowl.
This might be a p-name wager whose outcome a lot of us might not witness
:*(
TTom
|
56.1470 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:17 | 17 |
56.1471 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:30 | 11 |
56.1472 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:12 | 4 |
| I still think it was a good win by that Pats. The outplayed the Jets, and
seemed better prepared.
Any time the Jets lose it's a good day....
|
56.1473 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:38 | 3 |
56.1474 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:46 | 2 |
| Especially in the sense that it was really one of their first tests.
A game they needed, as it were....
|
56.1475 | They must keep the intensity up or the Colts will surprise them | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:39 | 25 |
|
Paul...
FWIW I too thought that Rucci foot was on the goal line and the Jets
should have got the ball on 20 but the refs didn't see it that way and
it is not the first blown call and won't be the last. As far as band-
wagon jumpers go I've been here all year and will continue to do so win
or loose. As far as the game itself thought it was a huge win. D was
excellent and the Offense was just good enough. Thompson ran the ball
very well. I didn't see any difference in the O-line just a quicker
set of feet out of the backfield which led to a more respectable yards
per carry. Hopefully Parcells will continue to use Thompson and go to
Butts when its 4th and inches as thats all he seems to get consistanly.
I'm not sure if it was just because the Jet receivers didn't adjust the
patterns and ran them "to perfect" but the DB's where on them like
white on rice all day. They seemed to give up the underneath a bit
more than I would like but bend don't break does seem to work more often
than not. Next week is the Colts and a win there gives the Pats a .500
record which is about right where they're talent/experience is. The
Bills game is certianly winnalbe and will likely decide who gets the
one of the last two wildcard spots. At this point the spots have one
just about locked.
Jerry
|
56.1476 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:49 | 11 |
|
>> Nice call by the ref on the downed punt that essentially won the game
>> for the pats.
Get real. The Pats dominated the Jets yesterday mainly because
I was there. The Jets managed a measly 219 yards total offense.
Take away the two Pats turnovers and this game is a *complete*
laugher. I will grant you that there are a lot of annoying band-
wagon jumpers calling themselves Pats fans these days but give
credit where it's due - the Pats kicked butt when they had to.
|
56.1477 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:18 | 7 |
| Regarding the line, the announcers on NBC said that Parcell's had worked with
them to get their butts out of the hole -- instead of blocking straight and
away, the linemen were turning, and plugging up the hole with their
big butts....
'Saw
|
56.1478 | what a guy! | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:31 | 1 |
| Tommy, you should have season tickets and go to every game.
|
56.1479 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:41 | 16 |
| Hey MikeH, Tommy is serious. He and Steve Kenney have not been to
a losing Pats effort this year. Anybody got two tickets for Sunday's Colts
game for these two guys? The Pats defense has actually looked like they
know what they are doing since the second half of the Minnesota game. Late
in yesterday's game there was a commotion going on across the field from
where we sit. The whole section by the 5 yard line was up and yelling. We
thought it might be a fight, but upon closer inspection we saw this very
buxomy young lady with a very tight white blouse on, jumping up and down.
Security came down and escorted her away, Now unless she mouthed off to
somebody my guess is she was ejected for having huge breasts. That being
the case, Busty Heart would never get past the gates. If the Pats can win
next week they may actually have a shot at the...
PLAYOFFS! There. I said it.
/Don
|
56.1480 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:58 | 11 |
| The announcers kept point out how the Jets were dropping the ball a lot but
there were clearly other times when the Pats secondary had the receivers
shut down. Coverage was a problem early in the year, it seems that they
have made that correction.
Now if they can beat the Colts in Foxboro they'll have it going right down to
the last two games. Beating the Bills up there following week there will be
tough.
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1481 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:01 | 10 |
| | Hey MikeH, Tommy is serious. He and Steve Kenney have not been to
|a losing Pats effort this year. Anybody got two tickets for Sunday's Colts
|game for these two guys? The Pats defense has actually looked like they
Hail, get them tickets for the Buffalo and Chicago games too.
Hmm, Buffalo and Chicago in December, what could be better
than that, Tommy?
=Bob=
|
56.1482 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:08 | 4 |
| Rod Smith laid some serious hits on the Jets receivers yesterday.
Could be why they started dropping the ball.
/Don
|
56.1483 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:45 | 7 |
56.1484 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:16 | 3 |
| I have a grinder invested on the Pats I hope I'm one of the two!!!!
Jimbo
|
56.1485 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:30 | 4 |
| Oh no, Jimbo picked the Pats. 8^( I guess I'll stay home next
Sunday and do Christmas shopping...
/Don
|
56.1486 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:50 | 6 |
| Nope that particular lunch was due to the Brownies "W" over the
Patsies.
I think their going to win every week!!!!!
Jimbo
|
56.1487 | A vote for Rucci | AKOCOA::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Tue Dec 06 1994 17:31 | 16 |
| A possible ruling by the ref on the Rucci play was that Todd downed the
ball while in bounds and then with ball dead in judgement of official
his foot subsequently scraped the line.
The question here is the whistle. The whistle is not necessarily to
determine where momentum stopped in placing the ball, that a ball
passed the plane of the goal to signify a touchdown. However, perhaps
the whistle must actually blow to signify the ball being dead.
But sports is not supposed to depend on instant replay, slow motion
views; the view of an experienced, objective person should be the sole
determination of a call. Getting rid of instant replay was the best
thing ever to happen to football and it's utter failure helped to keep
it out of other sports as well.
Now if we can just get rid of DH's
|
56.1488 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 23:40 | 7 |
56.1489 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Dec 07 1994 09:28 | 6 |
| I have to disagree about the instant replay. Everyone with a
VCR can replay a down to his/her heart's content. On a
controversial play, a coach should have the option to look
at instant replay.
Scott
|
56.1490 | just say no to instant replay | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 09:44 | 20 |
| The answer is not instant replay. It's better training, conditioning and
evaluation of the refs. Of course, having professional refs, instead of
part timers, wouldn't hurt either.
I don't like the idea of instant replay mostly because the rest of
football and all the other sports are totally dependent on human
judgement and this is the way it should be.
My one suggestion, in the interest of keeping the game going, is to
install some kinda electronic eye type device to determine first downs.
The idea of stopping the play to bring the chains in from the furthest
sidelines is a ridiculous waste of time. Put the ball down, gun it and
bingo everyone knows. If'n they can tell if'n a tennis ball being served
at 100 mph is a good or bad serve, they oughta be able to properly guage
a football laying on the ground.
Besides, the whole thing is dependent on the spot, which brings it back
to the human element.
TTom
|
56.1491 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 10:05 | 4 |
56.1492 | "quite well" = outta business | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 10:25 | 12 |
| Yeah, it, the other rules and the rest of the league is long gone.
Also, there's no way to take these calls completely outta of the play. A
continuing problem will be when the ref blows the whistle afore thangs
are stopped. So what'd they do: long pause, review, re-review and then,
oh yes, the whistle had blown.
In baseball, the ump has to make judgement calls on every pitch.
Certainly, the refs can be adequately trained to make these calls. And if
not, get some new ones.
TTom
|
56.1493 | instant reply=DH=astoturf=helmet speakers | MKFSA::LONG | | Wed Dec 07 1994 10:33 | 5 |
| I'm with TTom on this one. Leave the 'human' factor in and the
'techno-weenie' factor out.
billl
|
56.1494 | that's DG: Designated Geek ;-) | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 10:36 | 0 |
56.1495 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 07 1994 11:04 | 40 |
| It's funny, this ref thing.
Clearly, this year, the officiating has been very poor. I cannot remember
a year with more blown calls, more questionable calls, and more controversy.
Yet the League has circled the wagons, and are defending the refs with
everything they have. If it weren't so sad, it would almost be humorous,
the tap-dancing that is going on.
A few weeks ago, when the Giants played the Lions, there were two extremely
controversial calls, late in the game and in overtime, that contributed to
a Giants loss. The week following that game, Jerry Seeman, the head
honcho of officials, spoke about the controversial TD call late in the game,
putting forth a version of it that didn't coincide with anything any of
us saw, or most other folks either. He wouldn't address the blown call
about the knee being down in OT, but at the end he summed up by saying that
overall he was extremely pleased with the quality of officiating in that
game.
I began to wonder if perhaps Jerry Seeman shouldn't be peeing in a cup
just like all the players have to.
Since that time, I've seen the officiating go from bad to worse. I've
seen calls that are bogus at best, and I've seen glaring errors in judgement.
To cap it off, last Sunday night on the way home late, I caught Bob Costas
on WFAN interviewing Paul Tagliabue. Surprisingly enough, Tagliabue
is, overall, extremely pleased with the officiating.
He "debunked" the theory that the refs should be full time, instead insisting
that fact that men like Red Cashion and Jerry Markbreit are made better by
having other jobs -- jobs which require independence of thought and action,
and that makes them better refs.
He again broke down the arguments for replay (which I'm against btw), and
in general defended the refs performance this year.
When all was said and done, it reminded me an awful lot of the drivel
that comes out of Digital manager's mouths.....
|
56.1496 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 11:42 | 5 |
56.1497 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 07 1994 11:45 | 9 |
| I might be a bit biased, but I felt that forward progress had stopped on
that play, and that it wasn't a bogus call.
However, there are other's (Mike and the Mad Dog on WFAN) that feel
differently. To say the least it was controversial.
I guess though, you could make the point that after the Calloway call
in N'awlins, and the two blown calls in the Detroit game, that the Zebras
owed the Giants one....
|
56.1498 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Wed Dec 07 1994 11:46 | 7 |
| > They can't get them all right, and now the odds are the next
> critical missed call will be against the Pats and not for them.
Not true, Groaner. We'll all have to chip in on a course in
probabilities to explain it for you, but the odds don't change.
brews
|
56.1499 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:12 | 2 |
56.1500 | PAT SNARF | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:14 | 1 |
|
|
56.1501 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Wed Dec 07 1994 14:14 | 5 |
| > Gee, thanks for the probability lesson... what do you do, sales?!
Welcome, but what does my job have to do with it?
brews
|
56.1502 | Re. the Pats again | AKOCOA::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:39 | 11 |
| Are you saying Groaner that you heard the whistle blow after seeing the
foot scrape the endzone line?
And the issue is still: Is the ball dead when the ref decides it's
dead at which point he blows the whistle. If the ref saw Rucci down
the ball, in his mind everything that came after, including his blowing
the whistle was irrelevant.
I agree with another noter that said this play was a bad one to use in
a game dominated by the Patriots defense in the last 25 minutes when it
was there to be won and Pat's won it.
|
56.1503 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:42 | 4 |
56.1504 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:44 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1503 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> No, I'm saying the Pats are done. All the clowns that jumped off the
> bandwagon about 5 weeks ago, hopped back on... they'll all be back off
> again in a couple of weeks.
You keep talking about this. Exactly who jumped off the band wagon? As far
as I can tell there's been plenty of Pats excitement all year long.
George
|
56.1505 | Better sum as nun | PAKORA::DWALLACE | Digirola | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:41 | 5 |
| I feel that instant replay has a place as a safeguard. It was used far
too much before but if HC's were allowed only say 2 per game then I
think it'd please most people.
Davie.
|
56.1506 | tape down those ankles, Paul | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:49 | 2 |
| Groaner is jealous because he's been drooling over a spot on the Pats
bandwagon.
|
56.1507 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 18:01 | 5 |
56.1508 | HINT | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 07 1994 18:09 | 2 |
| There you go, messing up those probabilities again. Think permutations
and combinations.
|
56.1509 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:21 | 6 |
| Right now the forecast for Sunday is sunny and chilly. I can't
remember the last time all 8 regular season games were played in
such nice sunny weather. So you Midget fans going to credit Parcells
for this?
/Don
|
56.1510 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:12 | 7 |
| > such nice sunny weather. So you Midget fans going to credit Parcells
> for this?
For what, the weather? You've got to be kidding....
Everyone knows that the weather around here is controlled by Dr. Mel, of
WTNH-TV8, New Haven.....
|
56.1511 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:47 | 26 |
| If the season were to end right now, the Patriots would be the #3 wild card
team.
Pittsburgh and San Diego would be the #1 and #2 division winners and would
draw a by for the 1st round of playoffs. Miami being 1/2 game ahead of the Pats
would win the East and play the Pats on the 1st day of playoffs (#3 division
winner v. #3 wild card).
Cleveland would be the #1 wild card and would host #2 wild card L.A. in the
wild card game. L.A. would beat out the Pats for the #2 spot because the 1st
tie breaker is head to head play and the Raiders beat the Pats at Foxboro.
According to the Boston Globe, the Pats can clinch a wild card spot by
winning their last 2 games against the Bills and da' Bears, even if K.C. beats
Miami tonight. That would give the Pats 10 wins and Since the Raiders and K.C.
play each other on the final weekend of regular play, only one of them can end
up with 10 wins.
The Pats even have a shot at winning the Eastern Division if they keep
winning and Miami falls apart.
GO PATS!!!
George
P.S. Oh yeah, meanwhile there's that other Conference. Big scramble for their
#3 wild card with half the Conference tied at 7-7.
|
56.1512 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:51 | 2 |
56.1513 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:24 | 33 |
|
IMHO, the Pats continue to win in spite of Parcells' offensive
strategy. Why would you elect to start the game with the wind to
your back, only to start the game (surprise!, surprise!) by calling
a series of running plays, followed by a punt???
And how many people cringed when the Pats went for it on 4th and
goal when they were only up by 4 in the 3rd period? It worked, but I
would have felt safer with them just kicking the FG and getting the
7 point lead at the time?
The defense played great again. It is amazing that these are the
same guys that could defend a Pop Warner team the first month of the
season!
Bledsoe is amazing too. At one point in the 2nd period, the TV
announcers said he was only 3-14 passing. He then went 22-31 the
rest of the way (not counting the ones completed to the Colts :-( )
to finish 25-45 for the game. The interceptions are a major problem
for Bledsoe, especially throwing 3 of them inside their own 20 yard
line (I can't remember the 4th interception...). He seemed to regress
a little this week, getting another case of nervous feet in the face
of the blitz.
How can the Pats have such a pathetic running game, when a team
like the Steelers can lose Barry Foster and Bam Morris to injuries.
Only to have John L. Williams come off the bench and run for 94
yards???
JimH
|
56.1514 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:47 | 3 |
56.1515 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:49 | 18 |
| Yesterday was the first time in a long, long time the Giants were not
on TV.
WVIT-TV30, the local NBC affiliate, has this deal where call-in votes can
changed their scheduled game. They had the Giants scheduled, but more
folks wanted to watch the Pats.
So I watched the game. It was fun to watch. Nice recovery by Bledsoe
after the INT.
Plus, I enjoy Beasley Reece. My girlfriend knows him and his wife (used
to work with his wife) and she says he's very, very down to earth. His
color commentary is pretty good IMO.
Coates is a Monstah!
'Saw
|
56.1516 | | MKFSA::LONG | | Mon Dec 12 1994 11:07 | 18 |
| At least one of Bledsoe's INTs looked like a mixup b/w him and the
receiver. Receiver ran a down and up (and was wide open for a TD)
while Bledsoe threw it like he was expecting a crossing pattern.
He does bounce back well in the face of adversity for a youngster,
though.
Can anyone explain to me why the Colts defender was not called for
faceguarding (I think that's what it's called) when Bledsoe threw to
Coates down the middle? The ball was underthrown (actually hit the
defender in the back) and when Coates tried to get to the ball the
defender, who wasn't even looking at the ball, ran right into Coates.
The announcer gave an explanation, but the Legion was a little loud and
I couldn't hear the announcer.
billl
|
56.1517 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 12 1994 11:14 | 14 |
| >
> The announcer gave an explanation, but the Legion was a little loud and
> I couldn't hear the announcer.
>
Beasley said that if the defender has put up his arms, he would have b
been called.
They showed the replay, then the defender starts to put up his arms,
and Beasley goes something like: "Oh my, well, he put his arms up, I guess
the ref blew that call...."
'Saw
|
56.1518 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 12 1994 11:30 | 1 |
| Beasley Reese roolz!
|
56.1519 | the genuis is better... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 12 1994 12:00 | 7 |
|
>> Beasley Reese roolz!
that's just because he's a patriot fan........
;^)
|
56.1520 | Ask Grogan about winds in Foxboro | AKOCOA::BREEN | NCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and Arrogance | Mon Dec 12 1994 12:11 | 10 |
| one reason to pick the wind is that it tends to die down towards dusk.
so having it in the 3rd period would be an advantage but by around 4pm
it may not be anywhere near the same factor. So it's worth taking and
of course the other team is at a disadvangtage against the wind to
start.
But if Bill felt he had to establish the run to win yesterday and in
the future I can't disagree. Especially since I was up in Jefferson
all day beyond the reach of Patriot tv or radio.
|
56.1521 | they need the Heimlich | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 12 1994 12:26 | 1 |
| I don't believe San Diego will be a division winner in 2 weeks.
|
56.1522 | May yesterday not have been the last in Foxboro? | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:23 | 6 |
| LAst night on WBZ sports final, Bob Kraft was on, and told Lobel that
the league had told the Pat's to notify season tickets that the
possibility of a Wild Card game, as well as Conference Championship
game could be in Foxboro. Keep them fingers crossed!!!
RTG
|
56.1523 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:26 | 2 |
56.1524 | Just repeating what I heard! | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:30 | 7 |
| Couldn't figure it out myself.....but the owner of the team mentioned
what the league has told them. Maybe Mr. Kraft was still in the clouds
over having Unitas and Roger Clemens in his box for the game.
RTG
|
56.1525 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:34 | 9 |
|
I believe if the Pats win the Division, And if Pitt and the AFC
West winner get knocked off, the Pats will host the Championship game.
Chap
|
56.1526 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:47 | 5 |
56.1527 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:00 | 17 |
|
> I'm not convinced that if the Pats played the Browns in the AFC
> Championship and the Browns had a better record but no division title
> that the Pats would be home team.
If the Pats were division champs I'm not sure how this would work (I
thought homefield would go to the division champ) but this team need
not be the Browns in any case. It could be a lower wildcard. It is
indeed theoretically possible for the Pats to host two games (I doubt
there'll be even one) because I hear that they are selling these
tickets in two-game packages. That seems kind of sleazy, but on the
other hand I don't know how much leadtime potential playoff teams need
if all possibilities must be covered. The timeliness of the refund is
the key issue... ;-)
glenn
|
56.1528 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:05 | 38 |
| Here is how the Patriots could host the AFC Championship game.
Playoff teams of (Pittsburgh, SD, Miami, Cleveland, Pats, KC)
The 3 divison winners automatically get seeded #1, #2, and #3. So
the Pittsburgh/Cleveland division runner-up. Will be seeded #4, even
though they might have a better record then the #2, and #3 seeds.
Round 1
#1, #2 --- Have a buy week (#1 Pittsburgh, #2 San Diego)
#3 hosts #6 --- (#6 KC beats #3 @Miami)
#4 hosts #5 --- (#5 Patriots beats #4 @Cleveland)
Round 2
#1 would play #6 --- (#6 KC beats #1 @Pittsburgh)
#2 would play #5 --- (#5 Pats beats #2 @San Diego)
AFC Championship
#5 Patriots hosting #5 KC
You would then have the #5 and #6 teams playing for the AFC
Championship. Since the Pats were #5 seed they would host the #6 team.
For all you Pittsburgh/Cleveland fans. They can not meet in the
AFC Championship game. They will meet in round 2 because they
will be seeded #1 and #4.
You could figure out another senario for Pats hosting a Wild Card game.
If they win the AFC East and get seeded #3. They would host the #6
wildcard team in round 1. If things worked out, they could host the
AFC Championship game as well.
Ron
|
56.1529 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:06 | 4 |
| A wildcard team, regardless of its record, cannot host a game, unless
it is the wildcard game.
Division winners always get the HFA.....
|
56.1530 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:50 | 4 |
| The Cardinals somehow got the same letter. Maybe it's just a form
letter from the NFL.
brews
|
56.1531 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:55 | 5 |
56.1532 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:15 | 15 |
|
A wildcard can host a game other than the widlcard round.
#1 and #2 get byes.
#6 beats #3
#4 beats #5 (4,5,6 are wildcards)
#6 then beats #1 and #4 beats #2
Only 2 teams left are wildcard teams. #4 hosts the Championship game.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1533 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:49 | 14 |
| Got the letter in the mail on Friday. The Pats are indeed selling
a two game package. For us the total is $196.00 with a $6.00 non-refundable
handling charge. But the team will not mail out the tickets. Should the
Pats get a home playoff game (highly unlikely) the account owner has to go
to the ticket office with a photo I.D. and pick up the tickets. Oh, and Mr.
Macaroni and Cheese insists on a certified bank check or money order (no
personal checks or credit cards). Don't know if this is a league policy or
if the team sets the rules, but either way Harry Sinden would be proud of
it. I got a kick out of the yuppies complaining about how cold it was
yesterday. Compared to last year's Colts game, it was a walk in the park.
My question to Kraft/Tagliague is, what is the $6.00 handling charge for if
you don't mail out the tickets?
/Don
|
56.1534 | #1 Versus #4 Theory | GRANPA::CCUMMINS | What is the speed of dark? | Mon Dec 12 1994 16:04 | 14 |
|
RE:.1528
Pitt/Cleve Championship Game.
If a lower seed (#6) wins their Wild Card game, then #1(Pitt) would
play #6. While #2(S.D.) hosts #4 (Cleve). If Cleve and Pitt both win
you have a #1(Pitt) versus #4(Cleve) Championship Game.
I realize I should've extracted the part I'm replying to know what
the helium I'm talking about, but I'm not sure how .
Clark C.
|
56.1535 | The ultimate rhetorical question | AKOCOA::BREEN | NCAA: Noxious Cabal of Avarice and Arrogance | Mon Dec 12 1994 16:07 | 15 |
| >!My question to Kraft/Tagliague is, what is the $6.00 handling charge
>for if you don't mail out the tickets?
Slash,
You've got a great sense of humor... As if you don't know. This
scam about holding money and it's profitability is widespread in all
sports and interest on this money should be paid. This should apply
to colleges too.
Another scam is the arrests of private citizens letting go of a few
tickets at face value to protect professional scalpers both legal and
illegal. This lowers the respect for police and the cops don't
necessarily see a penny of it.
billte
|
56.1536 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 12 1994 16:18 | 15 |
| > A wildcard can host a game other than the widlcard round.
>
> #1 and #2 get byes.
>
> #6 beats #3
> #4 beats #5 (4,5,6 are wildcards)
>
> #6 then beats #1 and #4 beats #2
>
> Only 2 teams left are wildcard teams. #4 hosts the Championship game.
Right, I knew that.
I guess what I meant was before that....
|
56.1537 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Dec 13 1994 09:23 | 3 |
|
I stand corrected, the 'Spots and Steelers can meet in the
AFC Championship game.
|
56.1538 | Kraft lookin' for somebody to build him a stadium? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:25 | 11 |
| Speakin' o' Mr. Mac&Cheese...
I heard something lasted week about Kraft whining about
a stadium in Boston. He was claming the old saw about
"not beign able to stay competitive in Foxboro, blah,
blah blah, just like Orthwine. I couldda sworn that
Kraft said when he bought the team, that he would keep
it in Mass., no matter what. Was thised guy just playin'
us, or what?
=Bob=
|
56.1539 | Unfortunately for Kraft he doesn't have leverage Orthwein did | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:36 | 20 |
|
> I heard something lasted week about Kraft whining about
> a stadium in Boston. He was claming the old saw about
> "not beign able to stay competitive in Foxboro, blah,
> blah blah, just like Orthwine. I couldda sworn that
> Kraft said when he bought the team, that he would keep
> it in Mass., no matter what. Was thised guy just playin'
> us, or what?
You always expect that kind of talk from any incoming owner, so I don't
hold Kraft to a higher standard on that count. Kraft has a slightly
bigger credulity problem to overcome. When he only owned Foxboro
Stadium and _not_ the Pats, there was no need for a megaplex because
with just a minor owner-funded facelift Foxboro would become a
wonderful place where children could be raised and mankind could live
in peace and harmony. After he bought the Pats he's "broke" and the
picture is different...
glenn
|
56.1540 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:40 | 7 |
|
FWIW, last night's win by Miami for all intents croaked the Pats'
chances of hosting a playoff game (they really needed to be a division
winner). What day did those checks have to be in the mail? ;-)
glenn
|
56.1541 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:50 | 1 |
| Pats didn't need to host a playoff game in '85.
|
56.1542 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:53 | 13 |
| > FWIW, last night's win by Miami for all intents croaked the Pats'
> chances of hosting a playoff game (they really needed to be a division
> winner). What day did those checks have to be in the mail? ;-)
What does that make Miami now, 10-4?
The best the Pats could do would be a tie with them, right, and the
Dolphins own the breakers?
'Saw
|
56.1543 | For practical purposes... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 13 1994 10:58 | 12 |
|
> What does that make Miami now, 10-4?
>
> The best the Pats could do would be a tie with them, right, and the
> Dolphins own the breakers?
Miami is 9-5. The Pats could still win outright but it ain't going to
happen...
glenn
|
56.1544 | | MKFSA::LONG | | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:01 | 1 |
| Never say never.
|
56.1545 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:23 | 19 |
| Home games or no, that game came out better for the Pats with Miami winning.
The odds of Miami losing enough games and the Pats winning enough games for
the Pats to win the division were long at best. The Pats are better off having
K.C a game down which puts the Pats ahead in the wild card competition.
Before last night the Pats could clinch the #3 spot by winning both games.
Now if K.C. beats the Raiders in their last game the Pats can clinch the #2
spot by winning both games. Also it gives them a little more breathing room
should they lose a game, especially the closer against the Bears.
Before this game, a loss to the Bills would just about eliminate the Pats,
now the odds improve for them to get into the playoffs losing to the Bills and
beating the Bears.
If they lose them both I think they are out of it. There may be some really
odd combination that might save them but it would be pretty unlikely.
George
|
56.1546 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:28 | 3 |
| After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot. For whatever
that's worth....
|
56.1547 | Whewww | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:41 | 21 |
|
Well Right now Buffalo KC, the Pats and the Raiders all control there
own Destiny for the remaining "2" wild Card Spots??
Raiders have @ Seattle and KC at home
Buffalo has Pats and at INDY
KC Hou and at Rai
Pats @ BUFF and @ CHI
SD wins the West with one Victory. They got @ Jets and Vs PITT
Raiders can win the west with 2 wins and 2 SD losses
Raiders clinch a WC with a Victory and a KC loss this weekend
Pats Clinch a WC spot with A Raider and KC loss and A Victory
Buffalo and KC can both get back into it by winning there head to
heads against NE and LA
Chap
|
56.1548 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:46 | 7 |
| The folks I've sat with for the last 6 years are from Rhode
Island and I told them I would love to see their state build Kraft
a satdium for the Pats to play in. That way I could still go to
the games and the Rhode Island taxpayers could give Kraft his welfare
checks for the next 30 years.
/Don
|
56.1549 | Long way to go... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:49 | 13 |
|
> After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
> that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot. For whatever
> that's worth....
That statement is a bit strong. One loss in a difficult road game at
Buffalo and it becomes improbable (3 of 4 from LA, KC, Buff and Denver
would have to finish 8-8 -- the Raiders are pretty safe and Buffalo
would be in the driver's seat with only a final win against Indy
necessary...)
glenn
|
56.1550 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Dec 13 1994 11:56 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1546 by CAMONE::WAY "I'll miss you, Rak, my friend" >>>
>After the game last night (I caught the tail end on CBS Radio) they said
>that it was likely that the Pats had a wildcard spot. For whatever
>that's worth....
Well, if they lose next week to the Bills it will be tough. Then the Pats
would be tied with the Bills at 8-7 having lost 2 head to head games (1st
tie breaker). They would have to beat the Bears and either the Bills would have
to lose, or L.A. would have to lose both games.
Of course San Diego losing both could draw them back into the mix.
I think it all hangs on this upcoming game with the Bills. If the Pats win
then odds are they will make the playoffs. If the Pats lose, then they have
do beat the Bears and depend on other good teams losing to make the playoffs.
George
|
56.1551 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:03 | 2 |
| Thanks for the clarifications, folks. I don't get to see the paper often
and have no idea of the records of all the teams involved.....
|
56.1552 | Go Pats | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:09 | 6 |
| For youse Pats fans, Kelly will be out (according to the reports here).
You get to face another great U of MD QB, Frank Reich.
UMDan (who will root for the Pats anyway. NO MORE BILLS!)
|
56.1553 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:15 | 7 |
| Head to head with Buffalo would only be relevant in a 2-way tie break;
in a 3 or 4 way tie-break Buffalo could in theory be elimnated before
reaching the head-to-head 2-way tie break. I believe that NE loses
almost all tie-breakers that are division or conference record.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1554 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:16 | 7 |
| If the Pats don't beat the Bills they don't deserve to go to
the playoffs. But regardless of what happens in the next two games
they will have taken a giant step from last year to this. They
still will not be a real contender until they get a quality running
back.
/Don
|
56.1555 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:20 | 34 |
| Hey Paul, for someone who goes on about bandwagon tendencies, maybe
you can clarify these two entries of yours...
/Don
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.1208 The Unofficial New England Patriots Note 1208 of 1552
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." 10 lines 5-OCT-1994 08:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a Pats fan, but Bledsoe looks to me like the real deal.
If the Pats could add a few solid players over the next couple
years via the draft and free agency, they could have a long run
of years making the playoffs. What they need is one really top
notch RB, some OL help and Defensive help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 56.1342 The Unofficial New England Patriots Note 1342 of 1552
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The Donks are a premier NFL team, a" 4 lines 31-OCT-1994 13:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there any good QBs coming out next season. The Pats might have a
shot at one.
|
56.1556 | strained CL | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:25 | 1 |
| Kelly is gone for the year, even if they make the playoffs.
|
56.1557 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:29 | 30 |
|
>Head to head with Buffalo would only be relevant in a 2-way tie break;
>in a 3 or 4 way tie-break Buffalo could in theory be elimnated before
>reaching the head-to-head 2-way tie break. I believe that NE loses
>almost all tie-breakers that are division or conference record.
That's not really true, with a three (or more) way tie across
divisions. The first rule in the three or more wildcard tie breaker:
"Step 1: Apply division tie-breaker to eliminate all but the
highest-ranked club in each division prior to advancing to Step 2. The
original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie
breaker remains the same for subsequent applications of the procedure
that are neccessary to identify the thre wildcard participants."
So if Buffalo, New England, Raiders, and K.C. finish the season
tied at 9-7, Buffalo and New England would have the "Two Club Division
Tie Breaker" rule applied first to seed them 1 & 2. A Buffalo season
sweep would make them the team that advances to the next tie breaker
rule against a West Division team.
Bottom line: If New England loses to Buffalo, they pretty much need
the Bills to lose to Indy the following week to have any chance....
JimH
|
56.1558 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:49 | 11 |
| With the Patriots winning lately the media has had their snouts so
firmly planted up the Big Sardine's ample posterior that if one of them
sneezes Bill would get an enema. All this flap about his December record
should get a little more scrutiny. Three of last year's victories were at
home (Bengals, Colts and Miami) with the Dolphins being the only decent team
in the bunch (and their entire starting secondary was out with injuries).
This year he has beaten the Jets and Colts at home (not exactly the iron of
the NFL). So before we cannonize the Sardine as Mister December let's see
what happens in the next two games.
/Don
|
56.1559 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Tue Dec 13 1994 13:08 | 9 |
|
and the biggest part of that record was built while with the Giants who
did win some meaningful games in december. I guess you just been beaten
down so long by this team Don, that you'll wet noodle everything. I'd be
more worried about Bledsoe's peerchant to throw the inty than Tuna's
coaching ability. He's definatley not an offensive genuis but he does
get his players' attention and they do come prepare to play.
mike
|
56.1560 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 13 1994 13:39 | 1 |
| Hey, /Don, you want Dan Reeves? You cain have him!
|
56.1561 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 13:56 | 4 |
56.1562 | | SALEM::DODA | Bill and Hill: Dual Airbags | Tue Dec 13 1994 14:11 | 2 |
| Not to worry, it'll pass quickly, much like Greg Swindell's
career....
|
56.1563 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 14:17 | 3 |
56.1564 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 13 1994 14:36 | 7 |
| re: .1557
they must have changed that tie-breaker rule when they moved to
the 3 wild-card scheme.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1565 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:23 | 5 |
| Thank yew New Englund Patsies fer ridding the NFL of any chance of
having to see the Baffalo BIlls lose they're 5th straight Super Bowl.
JaKe
|
56.1566 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Dec 18 1994 20:34 | 5 |
| A serious q. for Pats fans. Did you really prefer having NBC show
the Dolphins-Colts game instead of the Browns-Steelers??
The Crazy Met
|
56.1567 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Sun Dec 18 1994 21:30 | 11 |
| Heard quite a bit on that subject on the AM radio driving all over
NH this afternoon and evening. The majority of the callers called
up complaining. However, one saner voice called up. He said any
'true Pats fan' (whatever that is) wanted to see the 'fins-Colts
game because it affected the Pats', still slim, playoff chances.
Made sense to me. Even if, as a diehard Steeler fan, I'd of rather
had the Steelers on the tube.
billl
|
56.1568 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sun Dec 18 1994 22:27 | 8 |
56.1569 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Dec 18 1994 23:29 | 5 |
| hmm, Globe mentioned that they would use a split-screen format for the
Pats postgame show. Not sure what they did.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1570 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:24 | 7 |
| > Heard quite a bit on that subject on the AM radio driving all over
> NH this afternoon and evening. The majority of the callers called
> up complaining. However, one saner voice called up. He said any
> 'true Pats fan' (whatever that is) wanted to see the 'fins-Colts
> game because it affected the Pats', still slim, playoff chances.
How are their chances still slim ?
|
56.1571 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:29 | 6 |
|
> A serious q. for Pats fans. Did you really prefer having NBC show
> the Dolphins-Colts game instead of the Browns-Steelers??
Definitely yes. Meant much more to a Pats fan than the AFC Central
bout.
|
56.1572 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:58 | 18 |
| Pats looked really shaky in the first half, then lit it up in the second.
Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
heads up defense.
I personally can't believe they beat the Bills by that much, but it was
nice to see -- I had to shut it off around 3pm to go to a birthday party.
Thanks to Indy they're tied for the division lead.
This team is interesting to watch -- it's all the football I've seen the
last two weekends because of when the Giants have/haven't been on, and they're
definitely interesting to watch.....8^)
'Saw
|
56.1573 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:31 | 6 |
| As a football fan, I'd much rather have seen the Browns/Steelers game.
As a 'Phins fan, I'd much rather have watched the Browns/Steelers game.
:^)
Mark.
|
56.1574 | This Pats fan's view... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:47 | 4 |
| Absolutely no question in my mind - I'd rather have seen the
Browns-Steelers than the Dolphoins-Colts.
=Bob=
|
56.1575 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:48 | 14 |
|
As at football fan, I preferred to watch the Browns-Steelers. I
turned off the cable TV, and went to the rabbit ears to watch the big
game on Channel 10 out of Providence.
I did occasionally switch back to the 'fins/colts game though. Was
anybody else surprised at the non-call on 4th & goal at the end? I was
shocked that Shula didn't drive his little go-cart out on the field to
explain to the ref that he was the chairman of the rules committee, and
that they needed to throw a flag on that last play!!! :-)
JimH
|
56.1577 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:50 | 13 |
|
The Patriots are still in a must win game next week @Chicago. I
wouldn't count on the Raiders beating KC. Especially if Montana knows
he is retiring, Joe will probably go ballistic.
A Pats win and a Dolphins loss gives the Pats the AFC East. Also
if the Pats win the AFC East. If San Diego loses to Pittsburgh next
week. The Patriots would have a buy week along with Pittsburgh.
The Patriots defense has been playing real well the last 6 weeks.
I look for them to shutdown Chicago's conservative offense. The Pats
opponants have only been coverting 20% on 3rd down the last 6 weeks.
So Walsh should be forced into passing situations.
Ron
|
56.1578 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:54 | 22 |
| I believe you are right up to this point:
> If the Pats lose to the Bears -AND-
> S.D. beats Pittsburgh -AND-
> K.C. beats L.A.
> Then
> The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
> in Miami.
>
> If the Pats lose to the Bears -AND-
> L.A. beats K.C.
> Then
> The Pats would be out of it, Cleveland, L.A., and K.C. would be the wild
> card teams.
If the Pats lose to the Bears and KC beats LA, then the wildcards will be
Cleveland, Kansas City, and Los Angeles, in that order.
If the Pats lose to the Bears and LA beats KC, then the wildcards will be
Cleveland, Los Angeles, and New England. New England would definately be
the #3 wild card; Cleveland would be #1 with a win or tie against Seattle,
and #2 to LA with a loss to Seattle.
|
56.1579 | ... with the correction mentioned | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:02 | 67 |
| Big win for the Pats!!! Looked a bit shaky at 1st but then the defense shut
the Bills down completely. Great game!!!
It seems that depending on next weeks games, the Pats can finish anywhere
from the #2 Division Champ drawing a buy to finishing out of it completely.
This is kind of complicated but Here's the way I think it works. Someone
correct me if I'm wrong.
If the Pats beat the Bears -AND-
Miami loses to Detroit -AND-
Pittsburgh beats San Diego
Then
The Pats win the Eastern Division and draw a buy as the #2 division winner.
If the Pats beat the Bears -AND-
Miami loses to Detroit -AND-
San Diego beats Pittsburgh
Then
The Pats win the Eastern Division and host the #3 wild card team at Foxboro
a week from Saturday
If the Pats beat the Bears -AND-
Miami beats Detroit -AND-
K.C. beats L.A.
Then
The Pats will be the #2 wild card and will play the wild card game in
Cleveland.
If the Pats beat the Bears -AND-
Miami beats Detroit -AND-
Pittsburgh beats S.D. -AND-
L.A. beats K.C.
Then
The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
in San Diego.
If the Pats beat the Bears -AND-
Miami beats Detroit -AND-
S.D. beats Pittsburgh -AND-
L.A. beats K.C.
Then
The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
in Miami.
If the Pats lose to the Bears -AND-
Pittsburgh beats S.D. -AND-
L.A. beats K.C.
Then
The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
in San Diego.
If the Pats lose to the Bears -AND-
S.D. beats Pittsburgh -AND-
L.A. beats K.C.
Then
The Pats will be the #3 wild card and will play the #3 division champ
in Miami.
If the Pats lose to the Bears -AND-
K.C. beats L.A.
Then
The Pats would be out of it, Cleveland, L.A., and K.C. would be the wild
card teams.
Does that look about right?
George
|
56.1580 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Come Monday... | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:41 | 6 |
| 1. Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
channel 4 was dead wrong changing. Sheer stupidity on their part or
worse.
2. LA plays after the Pat's. Do they have any incentive to win if the
Pat's lose? Are they already in the playoffs?
|
56.1581 | Uncle Al keeps chewin' on that straw, danglin from the precipice | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:49 | 11 |
|
> 2. LA plays after the Pat's. Do they have any incentive to win if the
> Pat's lose? Are they already in the playoffs?
No (not a big one), and yes (if the Pats lose). The Seachickens
sickened me last night. I just know that if for the first time in my
life I'm forced to root for the Faiders, they'll loose. Count on it.
The Pats had better win...
glenn
|
56.1582 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:51 | 24 |
|
>2. LA plays after the Pat's. Do they have any incentive to win if the
> Pat's lose? Are they already in the playoffs?
If the Pats lose, the Raiders are in the playoffs. The only
incentive they would have is to get the W2 seed vs the W3 seed.
It is easy to come to the conclusion that the Raiders would be better
off losing and getting the W3 seed and playing either @Miami or
@SanDiego in the playoffs. Instead of getting the W2 seed and having to
play the Browns in Cleveland. I think it is pretty clear that Cleveland
is the best of the three teams.
It is also pretty easy to picture Al Davis enjoying the idea of
knocking New England out by tanking the game intentionally. :-)
K.C. on the other hand would have to win to get into the playoffs
JimH
|
56.1583 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:56 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1580 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Come Monday..." >>>
> 1. Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
> channel 4 was dead wrong changing. Sheer stupidity on their part or
> worse.
Yah-but stupid all the way to the bank.
They probably figured that they wouldn't lose any regular football fans and
all the new fans attracted by the Pats winning streak would be more likely
to watch the Dolphins.
George
|
56.1584 | How big is the program that figured that out? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:02 | 8 |
| George,
it's plausible enough to me, but then, my eyes glaze over somewhere around
rule 36.
Didn't you leave out the stuff about the phase of the moon?
Steve
|
56.1585 | I was outa there.... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:04 | 13 |
| > 1. Yes, as a football fan the steelers - browns was the game and
> channel 4 was dead wrong changing. Sheer stupidity on their part or
> worse.
Yep, me too. I unhooked the cable and hooked up the attena.
I much prefered a snowy Steelers-Browns game from Providence to the
Fish Squishing. I woulda been very happy to just get updates from
the Miami game.
Too many yuppies in these parts. The Radio/TV stations
cater to them, and it shows in their broadcasting choices.
zamboni
|
56.1586 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:12 | 9 |
| re: coverage
I wasn't watching closely, but it almost seemed like NBC was avoiding
the issue of the Browns-Steelers. Every time they broke away to the
studio, they did quick highlights of the Chiefs game or the Giants-Eagles
game, but avoided the Browns-Steelers. The only updates I saw were
through the "ticker".
=Bob=
|
56.1587 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | IthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisining | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:46 | 7 |
|
Well me as a Raider fan would much rather have Joe Montana not in
the playoffs! So even when the Pats lose I still think the Raiders will
give the best that Art Shell allows! That game last night made me sick!
Art Shell sucks!
|
56.1588 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:48 | 9 |
| > Art Shell sucks!
The constant thing I hear about the Raiders is that they have tons of talent
but are one of the most poorly coached squads in the NFL....
'Saw
|
56.1589 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:51 | 6 |
|
but aren't Shell, Blitenkoff, Robiske and whomever just window dressing
for Uncle AL, who's really in charge? I thought Davis was supposed to
be a genuis? Maybe the game has passed him by?
mike
|
56.1590 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | IthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisining | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:51 | 9 |
|
Exactly Saw! When you have the weapons you gotta use them! Art
Shell is a Bill Parcells wanna be!
Chap
|
56.1591 | Here's hoping Pats and Chiefs bounce these underachievers... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:57 | 15 |
|
I particularly liked the part where Art Shell called timeout at
the end to make sure that the Seahawks would have an extra play to
place the ball exactly where'd they'd want it, and plenty of time to
get on the field for the potential game-winning FG... and they still
choked! The intent was to leave some time at the end of the game
if the Seahawks scored but with some 35-40 seconds left it was far too
late for that. The Faids figured that out and let the clock run down
anyway.
I didn't realize it before but from the last few weeks I've come to the
conclusion that the "intense" Jeff Hostetler is a punk, on the field...
glenn
|
56.1592 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | IthinkIhaveSAMBUKA poisining | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:07 | 8 |
|
I also loved with 1:10 left in the 1st half on your own 35 you run
the clock out??? Don't practice your 2 minute drill you'll never need
that!!!
Chap
|
56.1593 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:08 | 7 |
|
>> Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
>> heads up defense.
Yup. Nice adjustements by Big Tuna. Absolutely brilliant to adjust
those key turnovers into the game after the Patsies took the momentum
into the lockeroom by tying up the game at 17 after being down early.
|
56.1594 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:17 | 24 |
|
This version of the Raiders have to be the most undisciplined team
in NFL history. The last time they were on national TV, they set a
record for the most penalties in one quarter. At one point they were
offsides on 4 consecutive plays!
What was the story with the O-lineman who got tossed lasted night?
He must have punched about 3 or 4 Seahawks before the refs finally gave
him the heave-ho. All because of a rather tame Seahawk celebration
after a sack???? Way to help you team big guy!!!!
And the Raider timeout was a joke. Too bad the Flores didn't have
the imagination or the guts to make them pay for it by going for the
endzone one time. I think the running play he called lost a yard or
two!
And all Shell does is stand on the side lines with a permanent
disgruntled look on his face....
JimH
|
56.1595 | At 17-3 something happened | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:20 | 10 |
| Well somebody did something as the Bills were moving at will especially
on the ground for the first 20 minutes. I think the Pats wore down
Buffalo and Thomas' injuries were a key.
Hurst finally had Reich figured out but Frank refuesed to admit it and
continued to try to throw that way. But that fumble on the five was a
big (and Lucky) break any way you shake it.
Is it just me but does Hurst play single coverage about as well as any
corner in the league?
|
56.1596 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:26 | 9 |
|
>> Well somebody did something as the Bills were moving at will especially
>> on the ground for the first 20 minutes. I think the Pats wore down
>> Buffalo and Thomas' injuries were a key.
An article in the Globe credits defensive coordinator Al Groh with
recognizing and adjusting to a new blocking scheme that the Bills
were using. The adjustments came after the Bills scored their 17th
point.
|
56.1597 | Pats have a shot at goin to the SuperBowl | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:27 | 6 |
| I'm not much of a Patriot fan and haven't watched them much this year, but
from what I saw yesterday, it looks like they're playin some of the best
ball in the AFC at this critical time of the season. I wouldn't be surprised
to see them play the Steeler's in the AFC championship game.
Keith
|
56.1598 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:54 | 36 |
|
> >> Nice adjustments by Parcells (are you watching Dan Reeves?????) and some
> >> heads up defense.
>
> Yup. Nice adjustements by Big Tuna. Absolutely brilliant to adjust
> those key turnovers into the game after the Patsies took the momentum
> into the lockeroom by tying up the game at 17 after being down early.
Tommy,
I don't understand why you choose to hammer Parcells in
this instance. In another reply to mention you read the Globe article
which credits Groh with changing the Defensive Line's formation to
counter the Bills blocking scheme. The results were pretty obvious both
from just wtaching the game as it was played, and by analyzing the
stats presented in the article. After the Bills third scoring drive,
the Pats defense game up big.
For all the hype the Network highlight shows gave to
Bledsoe yesterday, it was completely missed that credit for the win
over the Bills belong squarely in the lap of the defense.
So why the derisive comments about the "Big Tuna"? Because
somebody gave him credit? Because his defense came through with 4 huge
2nd half turnovers? (All those turnovers were 'forced' by the Pats, as
opposed to 'here let me cough up a fumble for no apparent reason"
turnovers). Are you pissed at Parcells because he has a defensive
coordinator with the ability to make adjustments while the game is
going on?
Why? Why? Why? I just don't understand you sometimes....
JimH
|
56.1599 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:05 | 13 |
|
Al Groh made some blocking assignment changes and calmed down
the Linebackers. The LB's stopped over pursuing the ball and strung
out the line of scrimmage. Taking the cutback away from Thurman
Thomas. I give Parcells credit for going with the no huddle in the
2 qtr. Yes, The Pats were down 17-3 but the no huddle got the
offense in sink and they started to roll, scoring 38 unanswered points.
The Pats did what your suppose to do after a turnover, turn it into
points. This was the best game both sides of the ball played all year
long. The defense got the ball, the offense scored, giving the defense
time to rest and take the ball away again.
Ron
|
56.1600 | Drew the Main lived up to the hype in this one... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:06 | 17 |
|
> For all the hype the Network highlight shows gave to
> Bledsoe yesterday, it was completely missed that credit for the win
> over the Bills belong squarely in the lap of the defense.
I don't know about this, Jim. Anybody can play one strong half of
defense. For the first time in several weeks I think that it's the
offense that deserves credit for converting on those two TDs on 72-
and 64-yard drives when it was looking bad at 17-3. If not for that
the Bills could have played grind-it-out football and the defense
might not have had the opportunities to force those turnovers. Yes,
it was a team effort, but it was nice to see the roles reversed a bit
and show that either squad can cover the other if necessary. Even
Parcells acknowledged that this was Bledsoe's finest game as a pro...
glenn
|
56.1601 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:14 | 17 |
|
>I don't know about this, Jim. Anybody can play one strong half of
>defense. For the first time in several weeks I think that it's the
>offense that deserves credit for converting on those two TDs on 72-
>and 64-yard drives when it was looking bad at 17-3.
Yup, you're right Glenn. I guess I was thinking more how the game
went in the 2nd half. Those two drives were big. But the defense turned
in more than just "one strong half of defense". The Bill's 17th point
came just 1:56 into the 2nd period. At that point I figured thatthe
40-point barrier would be easily broken, I just got the team wrong.
From there the Pats' D pitched a shutout. Almost 3/4's of the game....
JimH
|
56.1602 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:21 | 11 |
|
I don't know what's not to understand, Jim. Parcells deserves
credit for teaching this team what it takes to win and for giving
them the tools to do it. He deserves credit for drafting Bledsoe
who at 22 years old showed yesterday that not only does he deserve
to be in the Pro Bowl but he could end up as the best ever because
this kid ain't even close to having reached his full potential. And
Bill deserves credit for taking a team that ain't close to being the
most talented in the conference to the brink of the playoffs. But Bill
don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he
didn't make.
|
56.1603 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:36 | 16 |
|
>... But Bill
>don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he
>didn't make.
I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
you blast Parcells??? I haven't seen, nor heard Parcells claiming
credit for the defensive turn-arround. I don't understand why you
took a shot a Parcells in this case...
This is one case where you should have shot the messenger....
JimH
|
56.1604 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:37 | 20 |
| > most talented in the conference to the brink of the playoffs. But Bill
> don't deserve credit for some phantom half-time adjustments that he
> didn't make.
Give it up Tommy.
It doesn't matter who made the actual adjustment. Parcells didn't have to
go over to Groh and say 'Gee, Al, you'd better make some adjustments otherwise
we'll lose this game'. After Groh has been with Parcells as long as he
has been, he knows enough what has to be done in Parcells' system.
An adjustment was made, and I first noticed it in the second half, very
late in the first perhaps, but definitely in the second half. So it wasn't
phantom, and it might just as well have been half-time if it was a tad
bit earlier....
|
56.1605 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:45 | 25 |
| > I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
> you blast Parcells??? I haven't seen, nor heard Parcells claiming
> credit for the defensive turn-arround. I don't understand why you
> took a shot a Parcells in this case...
>
> This is one case where you should have shot the messenger....
Okay, so let's say for the sake of argument, Groh sucks up the joint,
and his adjustment makes things worse.
At the end of the game is Parcells gonna stand up there in the news
conference and say "Well, we could've won, but Al Groh messed up the
adjustments and Buffalo ran roughshod over us". I don't think so.
A head coach is like a commanding officer. Even if he's in the bathroom
taking a leak, he's responsible for what happens. Ask the CO of the
Vincennes....
As long as he's responsible for the bad, there's nothing wrong with him
getting the credit when things go good....
|
56.1606 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:48 | 4 |
|
besides the fact that Al Groh couldn't coach his way out of a paperbag when
he was Ray Handley's DC.......he's either learnt a lot from that experience
or is getting some friendly suggestions.............
|
56.1607 | To the point where only the coaches matter, like wif' Dean Smith | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:49 | 18 |
|
At the risk of putting words into his mouth, I think Tommy's reaction
was as much to the praise of Parcells at Dan Reeves' expense ("are you
watching?") as to the unqualified praise of Parcells himself. For the
fifth straight week, including in two tough road games in Cleveland and
Philly, the Giants have won Parcells-style tough-it-out wars of
attrition. The conclusion is that not only has Reeves had nothing to
do with this, but that it has been done in spite of him. It really has
become laughable. These "adjustments" may or may not exist (Parcells
_explicitly_ stated in the postgame that it was more the case that the
defense started playing well than anything to do with adjustment)
but to the average fans like us those judgments are made superficially
based only on the results (which isn't bad as long as you're
consistent). In these two cases the results are not all that
different...
glenn
|
56.1608 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:52 | 4 |
| Everytime 'Saw talks about Parcells I swear I can hear the strains
of "Battle Hymn Of The Republic" in the background...
/Don
|
56.1609 | haha good one Slash...but nothing to say about the Sardine? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:53 | 4 |
|
better than Devo's Whip-it when he talks about Good Time Danny.........
mike
|
56.1610 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 19 1994 14:24 | 28 |
|
re .1604
>> Give it up Tommy.
>> It doesn't matter who made the actual adjustment. Parcells didn't
>> have to go over to Groh and say 'Gee, Al, you'd better make some
>> adjustments otherwise we'll lose this game'. After Groh has been
>> with Parcells as long as he has been, he knows enough what has to be
>> done in Parcells' system.
>> An adjustment was made, and I first noticed it in the second half,
>> very late in the first perhaps, but definitely in the second half.
>> So it wasn't phantom, and it might just as well have been half-time
>> if it was a tad bit earlier....
I think you're the one that ought to give it up, Saw. The Bills
scored their last points 1:56 into the second quarter. The ad-
justments that were made were made well before you say that you
noticed them And while you're crediting Bill with making adjustments
via osmosis, you ignore the fact that Big Dan and his Giants over
came a 10-3 half time deficit and scored 10 fourth quarter points
to keep themselves in the playoff hunt. Couldn't be that Big Dan
made some "half-time adjustments", could it?
|
56.1611 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 19 1994 14:26 | 7 |
| >> I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
>> you blast Parcells???
I didn't blast Parcells. That's just the way that you choose to see
it. I think that I merely pointed out the obvious.
|
56.1612 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 14:42 | 28 |
|
>>> I agree. Somebody incorrectly credits Parcells, instead of Groh. So
>>> you blast Parcells???
>
> I didn't blast Parcells. That's just the way that you choose to see
> it. I think that I merely pointed out the obvious.
Well, I *said* I didn't understand!!! :-) You did use the term the
"Big Tuna" which I took as sarcasm.
As far as the defensive adjustment in the 2nd quarter, it is pretty
obvious to me that Groh was responsible for it. Bill involvement at
that point would have been, "Al...DO SOMETHING!!!", or "yup Al, that
sounds like a good idea, do it!"
Either way, the head coach is ultimately responsible for the
success or failure of the team. And just because the Gints fans don't
recognize that for their current coach, is no reason to take it out on
their former coach....
JimH
|
56.1613 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 15:03 | 31 |
| Well, first off, I never advertised, promised, or implied objectivity.
I don't like Dan Reeves, I do like Bill Parcells. The reasons should be
obvious. I can list them if anyone really wants to hear them, though.
So, for obvious reasons (since we're all just stating the obvious in here
today anyway, cheeky lot that we are) all of my opinions concerning Dan
Reeves are what Mike Childs years ago aptly termed
Personal Opinion Fueled by Personal Bias
Therefore, if Dan Reeves came out at halftime, set up a swimming pool and
walked on water, shot a fan in the head and raised him up from the dead,
turned all the gatorade in to Newcastle Brown Ale, and healed a few
thousand lepers, I'd still tell you I think Dan Reeves is a lousy coach
who couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag.
Conversely, I'm apt to give Bill Parcells a bigger bit of leeway.
I freely admit this, I'm proud of it, and if'n any of you don't like
it you can all osculate on my rather ample, opinionated, butt.
With that said, I think that the Pats are in a much better situation long
term with Parcells, than the Giants EVER will be as long as Dan Reeves
and George Young are around......
So there 8^PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPpp
|
56.1614 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Mon Dec 19 1994 15:59 | 6 |
| Okay Mike, if the Patriots make the playoffs I will upgrade
Parcells from the Big Sardine to the Big Trout. By the way
congratulations on a very unexpected good year by your Giants.
Course we know the reason why, don't we?
/Don
|
56.1615 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 16:13 | 4 |
|
if they win the next one I'll agree..........
mike
|
56.1616 | For the record..... | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 20 1994 09:21 | 18 |
| I'll go on record here with this.....
If the Giants beat the Cowboys, whether or not Green Bay gives them a
hand getting into the playoffs, I'll congratulate the Giants on a year
that surpassed expectation.
There were those of us who had them at 3-13, some (me) at 6-10. 9-7
would be very good overachieving accomplishment.
Further, it is obvious that Dan Reeves had at least a part in that,
despite some inherent flaws, he did a good job.
You heard it here first....
'Saw
|
56.1617 | earlier woulda been better | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:09 | 6 |
| Real brave there Sawmain.
Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that
Giants bandwagon. ;=)
TTom
|
56.1618 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:12 | 19 |
| >Real brave there Sawmain.
Nah, just getting ready for the end of season wrap-up.
>Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that
>Giants bandwagon. ;=)
If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run one of them
drug sniffing dogs around there house....
Giants did do better than expected this season -- even I, Dan-Reeves-Hater
extraordinaire have to admit that. 8-8 is still better than 6-10.
Now, granted, they only beat ONE, count 'em, ONE team with a winning record,
but 8-8, 9-7 is still better than 6-10.....
'Saw
|
56.1619 | Haven't used drugs in years... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:14 | 12 |
|
>>Emmitt goes down, Aikman stinks up the place and now you're chasing that
>>Giants bandwagon. ;=)
>
> If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run one of them
> drug sniffing dogs around there house....
The Giants will win this game. Take it to the bank.
glenn
|
56.1620 | could happen | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:29 | 17 |
| Well, the Saints were within another pass by Aikman or so of winning
lasted night.
In the lasted 4 games by the Cowboys, you have them looking good with
Jason Garrett against the Packers on Turkey Day, beating Philly despite
Peete who had a hard time throwing the ball past the line of scrimmage,
losing to Cleveburgh with Aikman stinking up the place and hanging on
again with Aikman the principal stinkee.
Brilliant coaching there.
Irvin is hurt. In fack, the injury report for the Cowboys is longer than
any other 2 teams.
In short, the Cowboys can be had.
TTom
|
56.1621 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:30 | 11 |
|
>> If anyone really thinks the Giants are gonna win, I wanna run
>> one of them drug sniffing dogs around there house....
I think the Giants have a good shot at winning this game. Emmitt
probably won't play at all. Troy will probably play limted duty.
And Switzer won't exactly be pulling out all the stops. While Dallas
is trying to escape without injuries, the Giants will be fighting
for their lives. New Orleans gave the Cowboys all they could handle
before Everett threw another INT, the Giants can beat them.
|
56.1622 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:36 | 10 |
| I'm NOT jumping on any bandwagon, but I agree that the Giants can beat
the Dallas Saturday. Half of Dallas' offensive weapons are out, and the
Giants are doing the "win ugly" thang.
Also, San Diego played better lasted week, but are still slumping. I
think they can be had by Pittsburgh. Detriot(tm) is hot, and have a
good shot at beating the flat Fish. All that's left is for the Pats to
win...
=Bob=
|
56.1623 | should be a fun day | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:52 | 4 |
| It seems the Pats have more options this weekend than anyone. They can
go from missing the playoffs to a division winner with a 1st round bye.
Mike
|
56.1624 | Dallas over reports | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:40 | 15 |
| >> In fack, the injury report for the Cowboys is longer than
>> any other 2 teams.
The Cowboys injury list is the longest in the league because
they got in trouble with the league. They failed to report the
Troy Aikman thumb (I think) injury before the big game against
the 49ers. This caused the league to investigate (they wondered
if the point spread changed late in the week when the word
leaked out). The league fined Jerry Jones for this transgression.
Since that incident the Cowboys have gone over board reporting
injuries, every little cut, nick or boo boo is filed on the
teams injury report. Jerry Jones is playing cute with the league.
Vinny
|
56.1625 | not looking good fer the 'Boys | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:43 | 13 |
| I unnerstand about the injury list thang but just looking at the top of
the offense you have injuries or continued recoveries to Aikman, Irvin,
Harper, Novacek and now Emmitt.
Any way you slice it, it don't look good for the defending champs. Not
with the way San Francisco is looking and not with these key players
injured and/or unable to play.
Right now, the Cowboys would be hard pressed to beat some of the other
contenders such as the Vikings, the Lions, and maybe even the Bears. They
haven't looked good in quie a while.
TTom
|
56.1626 | Grogan at the Helm, 12/86 | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:08 | 13 |
| Yep, this game will be a lot like December '86 when the aging veteran
Steve Grogan came in when Eason went down and rallied the Patriots to a
stirring victory capped by a 3rd down pass to Stanley Morgan. All this
in the Orange Bowl to boot.
This vaulted the Pat's past Miami to the Division championship and left
Collingsworth and his Cinci colleagues crying in their beer.
This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
Steve although Raymond Berry never got it. In the playoff vs Denver he
went back to Eason until the game was lost.
Billte
|
56.1627 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:06 | 8 |
| > It seems the Pats have more options this weekend than anyone. They can
> go from missing the playoffs to a division winner with a 1st round bye.
>
> Mike
The same can be said for the top FOUR teams in the NFC Central. Any one
of them can win the division; any one of them (but no more than one) can
miss the playoffs.
|
56.1628 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:24 | 4 |
| | This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
| Steve although Raymond Berry never got it. In the playoff vs Denver he
Uhh Billte, I liked Grogan too, but...
|
56.1629 | Pats have a shot at a first round bye | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:50 | 6 |
| > The same can be said for the top FOUR teams in the NFC Central. Any one
> of them can win the division; any one of them (but no more than one) can
> miss the playoffs.
Yeah but will the NFC Central winner get a bye in their best case
scenario? I didn't think they could.
|
56.1630 | Get real!! | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELS | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:52 | 3 |
|
There will be hockey matches in hell before Steve Grogan makes it into
the NFL Football Hall of Fame
|
56.1631 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:03 | 4 |
|
SF and Dallas have the 2 byes in the NFC.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1632 | still ma man | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Tue Dec 20 1994 16:13 | 3 |
| Well I did say Hall of Fame caliber career. Some of this is an opinion
from viewing the performance. Partly it is what ifs concerning Raymond
Berry coming in as coach, 87 strike.
|
56.1633 | 1986 was one season where I had no problem with Eason | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 20 1994 17:08 | 18 |
|
> This inspiring performance capped a Hall of Fame caliber career for
> Steve although Raymond Berry never got it. In the playoff vs Denver he
> went back to Eason until the game was lost.
Well, I too disagree with the HOF caliber comment, and I was no great
fan of Tony Eason, but in his defense 1986 was his best season as a
pro and an excellent one. Nor do I recall that it was Eason who was
primarily responsible for that loss in Denver, at least to the extent
that he was dealing with a ferocious pass rush throughout. The instance
where Berry truly didn't "get it" came the next year when he insisted on
using Eason with the damaged wing in the season finale, also at Denver,
where Eason really was pathetic but moreover didn't belong on the field
in that physical condition.
glenn
|
56.1634 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 21 1994 08:45 | 8 |
| >
> There will be hockey matches in hell before Steve Grogan makes it into
> the NFL Football Hall of Fame
>
Well, Hell has our phone number, so if they needed systems to keep the stats
on......
|
56.1635 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Wed Dec 21 1994 08:51 | 6 |
56.1636 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 09:43 | 5 |
| I've heard that they will be adding ladies figure skating in time for
Tonya's arrival.
Whack!
George
|
56.1637 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Wed Dec 21 1994 09:52 | 3 |
56.1638 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 09:59 | 12 |
| If the Patriots keep on winning, Bob Lobel and the other folks at Boston's
WBZ TV will be chewing and spitting nails.
As of Jan 2, 1995, WBZ TV Channel 4 will be switching from NBC to CBS. The
local Channel 7 station will be switching from CBS to NBC.
For WBZ and Bob Lobel this means losing football just when the Patriots are
scheduled to play in the conference semi-finals.
Why does part of me want to chuckle?
George
|
56.1639 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 21 1994 10:06 | 4 |
| | Why does part of me want to chuckle?
Yea, without the Pats on his station, Lobel may actually need
to learn something about sports.
|
56.1640 | This guy is a complete baffoon | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Wed Dec 21 1994 10:33 | 10 |
|
Why bust on Lobel? Yea he has his faults. Big deal we all do. You
really want some ammo to rag on someone, listen to the Pats pre-game on
BZ starting at 9:00 this Saturday with Boob Nuemier. He is so obnoxious
I have to watch Sesame St. with my daughters at .5 hour intervals to
keep myself from wanting to kill something.
Jerry
|
56.1641 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 21 1994 10:44 | 7 |
| I've never listend to 'BZ's pregame because I knew about Nuemier.
WEEI has a show with Dale Arnold, Steve Nelson, and two reporters
that I think is great. It runs opposite the show on 'BZ, and I
always choose it.
=Bob=
|
56.1642 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 21 1994 10:50 | 10 |
| Neumier used to be one of the voices of the old WHA New England Whalers.
Then he got a sports job on one of the local stations. I believe it might
have been WVIT-TV30. On the air, and as a reporter, he was always slightly
controversial.
I did meet him once or twice in person and he seemed a bit more personable
but always in a hurry.
'Saw
|
56.1643 | They could both lose out... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 11:21 | 8 |
|
A Pats' wildcard game could end up with neither Ch 7 nor Ch 4, but
ironically on ABC with Ch 5. I don't know how the process works but
what I've heard is that for the money they spend on their MNF contract,
ABC gets some choice in the matter with the wildcard games...
glenn
|
56.1644 | But then again I liked Shenkel | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 11:24 | 4 |
| At least if not the best we'd have a crew that I at least can stand.
ABC doesn't seem overproduced and over scripted like the others.
I like Sommerall but unlike most don't overly care for Madden.
|
56.1645 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 11:33 | 15 |
|
Yeah, it's too bad about Bob Nuemier.
He seems to be an intelligent guy with a good knowledge of sports once you
get past all the exadurated verbal gestures.
I've heard that he is well respected by the horse racing crowd at places
like Churchill Downs.
But those basketball reports:
"And the Celtics lost because of THIS PLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY when
Dan-dy-DO-DO TOOK - THEM - TO - THE - HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP!!!!!!!!!"
George
|
56.1646 | | SALEM::DODA | Working on mysteries without any clues | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:03 | 5 |
| Who was that sports guy who was on one of the 3 Boston stations a
few years ago with the wacky name? Biff or Spiff or something
like that....
daryll
|
56.1647 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:05 | 2 |
|
Ziff Rzeppa. Believe it or not, he's huge on St. Louis now.
|
56.1648 | | SALEM::DODA | Working on mysteries without any clues | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:06 | 1 |
| Yeah that's him, actually isn't it Zipp?
|
56.1649 | Hey..wise up!!! | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:46 | 10 |
| > Hell allows sports participation, but only in major sports -
> football, basketball, baseball and soccer (the most popular
> sport in the world). Hockey, hop-scotch, ping pong, curling,
>>> candle pin bowling, ring-around-the-rosie and other minor sports
> are not allowed.
Hey groaner. What did I ever do to you. Keep candlepin bowling out of
your shots at ex-pats legends!!!
RTG
|
56.1650 | Big money in them pins... Not | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:52 | 9 |
| One of my favorite quotes (and sorry if this is a repeat) happened at
the local bowling alley where Billy Travers, who won 20+ for the
Brewers in the 70s was bowling. One of the local wags saw his form and
said "Hey kid, you could make a lot of money if you get serious about
this game".
Travers about that time signed one of the big free agent contracts and
like fellow Norwoodite Skip Lockwood never really earned it. Travers
did appear on the channel five bowling show a few times.
|
56.1652 | Neumeier's okay... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:05 | 11 |
|
I've heard the Neumeier pre-game thing on WBZ a few times and 90% of
it is an act, behaving arrogantly and busting on Tim Fox. The guy may
have a bit of an ego but as a sports reporter I actually prefer him to
the Lobel/Lynch/Dennis ilk because he actually knows something about
sports (including sports outside of the Boston area, shock of shocks!),
instead of relying on telling bad jokes, showing bloopers, and offering
generally ridiculous, mainstream cliched commentary.
glenn
|
56.1653 | Fox was a tough player | MAYES::MAILLOUX | | Wed Dec 21 1994 14:27 | 16 |
|
I listen to BZ as well and enjoy the bantering between Nuime and
Fox. I think Fox is excellent, and for obvious reasons knows what
he's talking about. I love the story he told last year about how
they had found ( ya right ) a hole in the lockeroom, that just
happened to be situated right next to the Chearleaders dressing
room.... Anyway, the guy that said Nuemier is a knowledgeable horse
man is correct, and it's no coincidence that he gets along so well
with his tunaship, for Mr. Bill ownes a couple horses himself. I
believe a read some place that next year Fox is going to do another
sport show but without Nuemier.
RM
|
56.1654 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:43 | 5 |
56.1655 | | SALEM::DODA | Working on mysteries without any clues | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:55 | 6 |
| The list of moronic sportscasters is long. How about Bob Gamere?
WMUR has Mark Ockerbloom (sp), what a buffoon.
What ever happened to Guy Manilla?
daryll
|
56.1656 | whatever happened to ol' whatsisname | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:10 | 8 |
| Guy left bz for Philly and I just heard (I think, that billte is very
apt in that regard) that he'd retired. Someone in the sports talk
fraternity is close to him.
I didn't like him but after he left thought better of him. And he was a
pioneer in the genre.
Then again there was BowWow Fredericks.
|
56.1657 | Travers | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:59 | 15 |
| Bill,
I bowled against Billy Travers in a channel 5 roll-off last summer. He
has such a smooth approach. Funny though....looking at him, you
wouldn't know he is a retired MLB player. He is one damn good bowler
though.
BTW.....fun fact.....Billy Travers is the only person to have been on
the channel 5 show as a winner, and not be able to defend his title. I
think it was in the 1981 strike year. If memory serves me correctly,
he had taped channel 5, won, and then the strike was lifted before his
next taping. So he retired undefeated. Since that time he has been on
and lost channel 5.
RTG
|
56.1658 | Sports Reporters.... | USCTR1::BARRY | | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:26 | 21 |
|
I'm pretty tired of Lobel's act. Particularly on the mornings when he
insists on bringing on "Lisa Boombaca" (I know I spelled that wrong,
but....) and the entire sports segment consists of extremely mindless
banter between the two. That's not what I turn on the tube for....
But the absolute worst sports segment in Boston is that guy on FOX. Don't
know his name; don't want to.
In light of the fact that there have been two major sports not playing
over the past few months, these guys have been presented with the
"opportunity" to display some creativity and go after new angles and
new stories. Without exception, they've failed. Instead of expanding
coverage of college or HS sports, or looking into amateur athletics
(which abound in Boston: Rugby, Hockey, Running, AAU B-Ball), we get
daily reports that nothing is happening on the strike/lockout scene.
Let's face it, when the sports teams are all playing, these guys have
it pretty easy. Now that they have to work for a story, they don't
really know what to do.
|
56.1659 | Is his name Mike Adams? Rings a bell... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:32 | 6 |
| | But the absolute worst sports segment in Boston is that guy on FOX. Don't
| know his name; don't want to.
Agreed. I don't watch often, but I've never seen this guy keep his
comentary in time with the highlights he is showing. He makes stupid
comments, and YELLS.
|
56.1660 | | TENVAX::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Tue Dec 27 1994 12:25 | 28 |
| Regarding the comments on Parcells and the adjustment of the "D":
I believe that the Pats have not allowed a 2nd half touchdown in the
past 5 games.
This certainly indicates that the team has been able to consistently
make whatever adjustments are necessary.
I give credit to Parcells for either making the changes, or for having
the brains to hire Al Groh and allowing him to make the changes.
I also give credit to Parcells for another aspect of this team that
hasn't gotten much notice, and that is the fairly low incident of major
injuries, something that wasn't always the case in the past 10-15
years. I don't know if it's due to the conditioning coach and his
program, or Parcells' not having them beat each other up during
practice, or a combo of both. Perhaps it's only luck. But, I doubt
it.
They are playing smarter football. By that, I mean far fewer foolish
mistakes that always seemed to come at the wrong time, and the turnover
ratio between gives and takes. This reminds me of the NFC game.
I'm glad he's here, and I hope he stays for a long while. I don't care
of the writers love him or hate him. I think the players respect him,
and that's what matters.
Lee
|
56.1661 | | CSLALL::BRULE | go ahead with your own life leave me alone | Tue Dec 27 1994 13:45 | 3 |
| Parcells Strength coach deserves a lot of credit to the low number of
injuries. So doesn't the elimination of the artificial turf in Foxboro.
|
56.1662 | too much carpet | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 13:48 | 11 |
| > injuries. So doesn't the elimination of the artificial turf in Foxboro.
Amen, brother.
They oughta make that there carpet-turf illegal. Period.
On the issue of injuries, it shore does look like the 16 game schedule is
a bit too long for the size, strength and speed of today's players. I've
never seen so many people down and out at the end of the season.
TTom
|
56.1663 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:12 | 6 |
|
actaully Parcells does have them beat one another up to a certain extend.
They do get monday and tuesday off but practice in pads all week unlike
alot of other teams...........
mike
|
56.1664 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:42 | 12 |
|
Parcells encourages EVERYONE to stay around during the offseason.
So that they can workout under the supervisor of the Strength and
Conditioning coach. If you do not you better be in GREAT shape come
training camp. If not you will be in Parcells dog house and in some
cases traded away. Drew Bledsoe spent 1 month back home in Washington
then returned to Boston last year. Then started watching film in
February.
The other thing about Parcells is that you better be able to run
2 miles in x amount of time and do the 40 yrd dash in x amount of time.
If not you don't even practice. If you are not in condition you
don't practice, you run laps and lift weights.
|
56.1665 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:49 | 10 |
|
Over the past few days, a Pats player or two has cited their superior
conditioning as a reason for their late season surge and their ability
to take over the game in the third and fourth quarters. These guys also
have supreme confidence in Big Tuna's ability to prepare them for and
guide them through the playoffs. And yes, they have not given up a second
half touchdown in five games. That *is* a testimony to the defensive
staff's ability to adjust to whatever new wrinkled the opposition has
decided to toss at them. The Patsies are peaking at the right time and
Hal and Groaner will be bummin' because of it.
|
56.1666 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:52 | 5 |
| A trademark of the Big Horned Pout's teams is that they are
physically and mentally tough. Sometimes this is enough to overcome
other deficiencies.
/Don
|
56.1667 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 16:09 | 5 |
| I would not be the least bit suprised to see the Beached Whale's team
picked as a slight favorite over the Browns.
billl
|
56.1668 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 16:27 | 11 |
| | I would not be the least bit suprised to see the Beached Whale's team
| picked as a slight favorite over the Browns.
I would. Home field is a HUGE advantage for the Browns. The Browns may
not be as hot as the Pats, but they are coming off a big win against
Dallas in their last really hard game of the season. The 3-3� point range
seems about right.
That's not to say I won't be rooting for the Pats like crazy...
=Bob=
|
56.1669 | Pats that good | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Tue Dec 27 1994 16:53 | 11 |
| Seems to me that the Patroits Offensive line just played great. Reminds
me of watching BYU creating a wall for the QB DuJour to just stand back
and wait for the open man.
Question :
Does Bledsoe hold the ball at his waist cause he hasn't been taught to bring it
up to the ear hole or is he just quick enough to rest it there to cause the
defense confusion on the direction of the pass ?
Jeff
|
56.1670 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 17:00 | 12 |
| If I understand the spreads correctly, a 3 point spread would
basically mean these two teams are equal, but the 3 points are
usually given to the away team. If the Pats are just a 1 to 1 1/2
point 'dog then I would interpret that to mean the oddsmakers
consider the Pats to be the better team (on a neutral field).
You're right, though, Cleveland Municiple Stadium is anything but
neutral.
billl
|
56.1671 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Dec 27 1994 20:22 | 12 |
|
>>Dallas in their last really hard game of the season. The 3-3� point range
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Okay =bob=,
so the STEELER game was a cakewalk fer the 'Spots, right??? Twasn't a
hard game fer them , they just chose to lay down and get their butts
beat.
JaKe
|
56.1672 | I was confused | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 28 1994 08:19 | 6 |
| | so the STEELER game was a cakewalk fer the 'Spots, right??? Twasn't a
| hard game fer them , they just chose to lay down and get their butts
| beat.
Okay, okay, I forgot that the Steelers (err, I mean STEELERS) game was
after the Cowboys game...
|
56.1673 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Wed Dec 28 1994 08:59 | 4 |
| Who would've thought that anything with that ugly Elvis logo
would be such a hot item? It's amazing what winning can do.
/Don
|
56.1674 | Winners sell seats | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Wed Dec 28 1994 09:09 | 11 |
| Having a winning team does wonders for areas associated with the team -
attendance, merchandise sales, community spirit, etc. When the Braves
were stinking up the joint you could practically sit in the dougout
during the game. Once they started winning, you could hardly scalp a
ticket to a big game. It's amazing that more owners don't (won't,
can't?) see this. Winners (not offense or defense specifically) puts
people in seats.
JMHO
UMDan
|
56.1675 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Wed Dec 28 1994 09:14 | 7 |
|
Speaking of merchandise, the Patriots have gone from #28 in the
league to #10. In total revenue generated from merchandise sales. So
the other owners must like the new logo. Since the merchandise money
is split equally.
Ron
|
56.1676 | Re Pats' merchandise | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Wed Dec 28 1994 09:37 | 5 |
| I actually saw a guy wearing a New England Patriots jacket on the
pedestrian mall between Karlsplatz and Marienplatz here in Munich
last week.
Steve
|
56.1677 | Good reading; occasionally random with da facks... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 28 1994 10:26 | 14 |
|
Anybody got the definitive scoop on the Patriots' home schedule for
next year? In Monday's Globe, they listed both Pittsburgh and San Fran
under home opponents "if Miami won last night", then on Tuesday they
reversed it and showed both games on the road. Big difference. I
suspect that the latter is correct, but when it comes to the minutae
you never know with the Globe (like with the playoff tie-breaker
situations; they had them screwed up all week long, including stuff
like the Bears losing the tie-breaker to the Giants on "net points
against common opponents" when it had been well-established for two
weeks that all the NFC Central teams held those tie-breaker advantages).
glenn
|
56.1678 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Wed Dec 28 1994 10:42 | 5 |
| I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year. Last
time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
loss. Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
/Don
|
56.1679 | Panthers is coming to town | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 28 1994 10:43 | 0 |
56.1680 | It's been a long time... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:03 | 13 |
|
> I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year. Last
> time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
> loss. Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
Last time I saw them there, too, and the last time they've been to
Foxboro. I probably came away a bit happier, though. ;-) As I recall
the Steelers were unimpressive and the Pats handed them an opportunity
in OT by choking in the final minutes of regulation, then ol' (young)
Matt Bahr won it in sudden death...
glenn
|
56.1681 | yabbut will they have a coach? | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Pogue Mahone | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:04 | 1 |
|
|
56.1682 | not for lack of trying... | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:24 | 9 |
| I've been waiting since I moved here to see the Steelers in
Foxboro. Coming of age in the early 70's made it impossible
to see them at 3Rivers. Hail, the only live Steeler game I've
ever attended was vs. the Cowboys in Pitt Stadium. I'm not
sure of the year, but my dad tells me it was Dallas' first
year.
billl
|
56.1683 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:57 | 10 |
| <<< Note 56.1678 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "One More One..." >>>
> I would love to see PittsburgH come to Foxboro next year. Last
> time I saw the Steelers there was the 1979 Monday night overtime
> loss. Didn't get home until 3:30 in the morning.
Slash, wuz that the 16-13 OT loss on Labor Day weekend? I *vaguely*
remember being there with a caravan from WPI my Senior year.
Mark.
|
56.1684 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:37 | 19 |
|
>>I've been waiting since I moved here to see the Steelers in
>>Foxboro. Coming of age in the early 70's made it impossible
>>to see them at 3Rivers. Hail, the only live Steeler game I've
>>ever attended was vs. the Cowboys in Pitt Stadium. I'm not
>>sure of the year, but my dad tells me it was Dallas' first
>>year.
Firsted game I was was aginst the Eagles in Pitt Stadium, STEELERS got
their asses kicked that day.
When I got out of the Air Farce, a good friend's dad worked for a
company that had about 20 seats to Three Rivers, and we ended up with 2
seats fer every game, including the playoffs. Was sitting there
drinking tequila and beers when they beat the Oilers 34-5 on their way
to the Super Bowl, in all the ice and snow and freezing rain.
JaKe
|
56.1685 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Wed Dec 28 1994 16:26 | 10 |
| � Slash, wuz that the 16-13 OT loss on Labor Day weekend? I *vaguely*
� remember being there with a caravan from WPI my Senior year.
� Mark.
Yup. It was also the night you, me and sixty thousand other drunks
paid tribute to Darryl Stingley. Also the State Storm Troopers were in fine
form after the game in the parking lots.
/Don
|
56.1686 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:02 | 12 |
| Well the season is over the the Pats but they did fine. Few expected them to
make the playoffs and almost no one expected them to make it when they were
3-6.
Congradulations to the Browns but they didn't exactly run away with the game.
One lucky catch right at the end and the Pats would have been able to tie the
game. Matt Barr could have won it in overtime.
Next year the Conference Championships. The year after that, the Superbowl.
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1687 | At least my #2 team, the Packers will get one more week... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:13 | 9 |
| The Pats need to get much bigger on both lines of scrimmage.
If they can't do this, I don't care if they get Barry
Sanders and his brother Deon, they will not be serious
Super Bowl contenders.
Congratulations to the Browns, they won the game on the
line of scrimmage.
=Bob=
|
56.1688 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:24 | 27 |
|
I'm pretty happy with the New England Patriots. At the beginning of
the year, I thought an 8-8 season would be a success. I never would
have predicted a playoff berth for this team. An excellent season, a
lot of fun to watch this team develop, The only time I was disappointed
was the three game stetch losing to the Raiders, Jets, and Dolphins.
Those were the only games they played without any spark.
Next year they should be a serious contender for the AFC East
Division, and go a little deeper into the playoffs.
It'll be interesting to see what Parcells does with personell
changes now. I think they need:
o - To improved the Offensive Line, especially the Run Blocking.
o - A speedy WR to give Bledsoe a true deep threat.
o - A pound it down-you-throat running back
o - a long term answer to the place-kicking game....
JimH
|
56.1689 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:53 | 12 |
|
During last nights news they showed Parcells daily press
conference for Monday. They asked Bill what needs to be done.
He didn't give exact answers. Then there was talk about how
the Patriots have 18 either FA's or RFA's. He said the coaching
staff and myself will evaluate our team, evaluate our needs.
Then decide who to resign and who not too. He said that
decisions would be made quick. He wants to notify all the players
who are not going to be offered contracts ASAP. So that they
can sign on with another team.
Ron
|
56.1690 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:06 | 4 |
| Letting go of Butts and Reynolds would free up some salary cap
dough...
/Don
|
56.1691 | Which WR would you like ?? | MASALA::DWALLACE | Digirola | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:51 | 5 |
| I was under the impression that Timpson was a good WR & Brisby a very
good WR. And nobody gives a $hit about Crittendon anyway as he's in
very few series - as long as he can hang onto the ball then that's good
enough.
Davie.
|
56.1692 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:08 | 26 |
| Okay, I don't understand something. (I know, nobody is
surprised by that).
According to the newspaper, Kraft (owner of Pats) is
bleating about losing $10 Million per year, and that he
needs state money to do this, that, and the other thang.
What I don't understand is this - how could this guy
manage to lose that much given the following:
o There is a hard salary cap in the NFL, so
his payroll is no more than anyone else's.
o His games are ALL sold out.
o The Pats have gone from the bottom to near
the top in merchendise sales.
o He OWNS the stadium - no rent, no sharing
luxury boxes, he gets the parking lot
concession, etc.
o He has no front office infrastructure to
speak of, particularly after he canned
Patrick Forte
I didn't read the whole article, but what's the story, is
this guy another Billy Sullivan when it comes to business?
=Bob=
|
56.1693 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:28 | 16 |
| It appears that he's trying to make a case to get the city and state to build
him a new stadium down town.
While he's probably being just a tad sleazy he does have a point. When the
former owners were threatening to take the Patriots to St Louis the Governor,
Mayor, and Mass Legislature were scrambling to make an 11th hour deal to build
a stadium to convince the owner or new owners to stay in the Boston area.
Then Kraft stepped in and bought the team pledging to keep them in town and
suddenly all the promises of a new stadium vanished.
The hard reality is that arm twisting is the only way a new stadium will ever
be built. As long as the politicians in town believe that Kraft is happy out in
Foxboro, no stadium will get built.
George
|
56.1694 | Don't look at water's level, look at water's flow | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:35 | 7 |
| I believe the agreement with the banks that financed the purchase
called for a lot of money (interest) to be paid early in the loan(s).
He probably has a lot of depreciation costs in the bottom line. The
real bottom line will be in the money spent for free-agents.
Gee didn't Goodenau(sic) and Fehr say the same type of thing.
|
56.1695 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Mon Jan 30 1995 11:51 | 8 |
|
He may own the stadium, but he probably has payments on it. Most
people don't usually plunk down a few hundred million cash when they
makle that kind of purchase. Except for the appreciation in a team's
value, I don't think most owners go into the franchise business
planning to get rich, though.
brews
|
56.1696 | $ Kraft does not get | MROA::WILKES | | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:44 | 7 |
| I believe merchandise revenues from NFL Properties are shared equally,
so an increase in sales of Patriot paraphenalia does not directly help
Kraft. Jerry Jones wants to get this arrangement changed because in
recent year about 1/3 of all NFL Merchandise has been Cowboys logos.
Also, I am pretty sure Kraft does not own the parking lots at Foxboro.
They belong to Eddie Andelman who owns the Foxboro Racetrack.
|
56.1697 | Money | CSLALL::BRULE | the road of life is filled with idiots | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:54 | 10 |
| According to Andleman, Kraft leases the parking lots from Eddie.
I'm wondering if Kraft is playing some kind of shell game. He maybe
losing 10 mill per year on the Pats buy does this include money he pays
to himself for a lease? Does Foxboro stadium make a profit?
I'd like to see the state give Kraft some kind of low interest loan so
he can renovate the stadium allowing Kraft to add luxury boxes and 10
thousand seats. Pay for it with lottery money so there is no taxpayer
money involved. Too bad Foxboro wasn't a little closer to Boston.
Putting a new baseball stadium right next to the football stadium would
be great.
|
56.1698 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | SaveThePatriots | Tue Jan 31 1995 16:05 | 12 |
| Personally if the Macaroni and Cheese man is losing money, I feel,
too bad! If he overpaid for the Patriots then the state has no obligation
to make good on a bad investment. If Hartford or Providence wants to
guarantee profits for somebody who is very rich to begin with, fine. I'll
still attend the games unless they try the "personal seat license" scam.
What Kraft really wants is more luxury boxes, since that income is not
split with the visiting teams like the other gate money is (course he
doesn't want to pay for them). Given the current zeal to clean up the
welfare mess I see no benefit in cutting certain social benefits just to
spend even more on someone who certainly doesn't need assistance!
/Don
|
56.1699 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Wed Feb 01 1995 09:41 | 18 |
| I'm still dumbfounded that this schmuck manages to lose
$10 MILLION. I could see from the circumstances that he
could be in red ink, but $10 Mil?
So if he is losing $10 Mil, Jeff Laurie must be losing
what $15 Mil? And the guy who bought the Bucs will lose
even more?
Yea, the state should subsidize their poor business
judgement.
On the other hand, I have no problem with the state
spending money to fix the roads in and around the
stadium. Traffic access tot he place sips big time, and
even when there is no game, rt. 1 is historically a
dangerous road.
=Bob=
|
56.1700 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Feb 01 1995 09:59 | 4 |
| Dan Shaughnessy basically told Kraft to perch 'n twirl in today's
Globe.
Mark.
|
56.1701 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:04 | 7 |
| >>perch 'n twirl
Is that a new gymnastic event?
billl
|
56.1702 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:12 | 7 |
| >>perch 'n twirl
>Is that a new gymnastic event?
Depends on what kind of gymnsatics.
The Crazy Met
|
56.1703 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin, LKG1-3/L6 | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:13 | 13 |
|
>Dan Shaughnessy basically told Kraft to perch 'n twirl in today's
>Globe.
Somebody refresh my memory. What elective office does Danny-boy
hold?
If there is somebody in Boston who seriously needs to perch 'n
twirl, it's Danny-boy!!!
JimH :-)
|
56.1704 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:22 | 14 |
|
I think I saw Dan Shaughnessy today. I was driving through Newton to get from
my house in Brighton to the Turnpike and a guy was jogging up the hill that
looked just like Dan.
Then again maybe it was a look alike. Could you imagine going through life
looking exactly like Dan Shaughnessy.
Anyway I agree that the Patriots should get their house in order but I'd
still like to see a major stadium with a retractable dome built down town. Then
I could go to Patriot games any time of the year without fighting the traffic
out to Foxboro.
George
|
56.1705 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:41 | 9 |
| I don't know what Dan Shaughnessy looks like....8^)
I recognize Bob Ryan now, because he's on ESPN on occasion on that show
with Dick Schaap, but I don't know what Shaughnessy looks like.
I hope for his sake he don't look like Eddie Andelman! 8^)
'Saw
|
56.1706 | Who knows what the honest-to-god real number is... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:58 | 10 |
|
"Losing $10M" is a relative thing in sports-bookkeeping-speak. You
start with the premise that nobody makes any money, or very little.
My name is Jerry Jones and I'm not in this for the money; I actually
only made $13 after taxes last year. Against that standard I don't
doubt that Kraft lost $10M. And the average NFL situation is what the
poorer teams will compare against...
glenn
|
56.1707 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:59 | 9 |
56.1708 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Feb 01 1995 11:04 | 3 |
56.1709 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | SaveThePatriots | Wed Feb 01 1995 11:23 | 13 |
| Spending money on Route 1 would help the traffic flow somewhat, but
you still have all those parking lots emptying out on to only one road. An
extra lane would be nice, but most of the accidents are caused by folks who
get snockered at the game. Spending state money to build 100 or so extra
luxury boxes is welfare for the rich. I've been a season ticket holder for
7 years now and a fan since the Boston Patriots/Fenway Park days, but if the
only way the state can keep the team is through massive subsidies then I
say so long it's been good to know you. Do you really think Kraft would be
making an issue of his losses had the Patriots gone 6-10 instead of 10-6?
He's taking advantage of the popularity of the team to try and line his
pockets.
/Don
|
56.1710 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:12 | 8 |
| Which is basically Shaughnessy's position.
Like the column read, "if Kraft moves the team or sells to an out of
state investor, he'd be the modern-day Harry Frazee."
Given the popularity of the team, he'd get skewered.
Mark.
|
56.1711 | Ram envy | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Feb 03 1995 07:39 | 12 |
| .1709, Slasher:
> He's taking advantage of the popularity of the team to try and line his
> pockets.
He's seen the city of St. Louis open the doors to the city treasury and
invite Georgia Frontiere to walk in with a bushel basket.
Hell, if St. Louis will hock the farm for a franchise as desperate as the
Rams, what can I get for a winner?
Steve
|
56.1712 | Been meaning to ask... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Tue Feb 07 1995 10:22 | 1 |
| So like, why did the Pats fire Patrick Forte as VP?
|
56.1713 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Fleet Forum | Thu Feb 23 1995 17:21 | 7 |
| Let me get this straight. Parcells thinks a backup defensive
tackle is worth one million dollars but Kevin Turner doesn't rate
a 750K qualifying offer (guaranteeing a first round draft pick should
he be signed away). I guess I just don't understand the workings
of a genius mind.
/Don
|
56.1714 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | London Calling > Sandinista? | Fri Feb 24 1995 10:57 | 5 |
|
Maybe he's going to sign OJ Anderson.....seriously though FB's are a dime
a dozen.............
mike
|
56.1715 | Look at the whole picture. | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Mon Feb 27 1995 11:59 | 7 |
| Parcell's has never said that Turner wasn't worth 750 K. He just gave
him a qualifying offer of 350k. He has the right to match any offer
that Turner brings back. At that time Parcells will have to decide
whether Turner is worth whatever he brings back, would rather have the
3rd round pick or match the offer and trade him to another team. Why
should he make a high qualifying offer? I look at it as good cap
managment. Also Sam Gash is just about the same as Turner.
|
56.1716 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Fleet <fill in the blank> | Mon Feb 27 1995 14:19 | 15 |
| Let's say the Patriots don't get Meggett. Since the compensation
for Turner will only be a third round draft pick certain teams may find him
attractive. He's a good blocker and a very good pass catcher. If Meggett
is worth 2 million them maybe some GM may decide to pay Turner one million.
Do the Pats match the offer? Could depend on whether or not they've got
Thompson signed or not. Maybe nobody goes after Turner if the compensation
is a first round draft pick and the Pats get him for 750K. While Gash is
maybe a better runner and just as good a blocker I don't think he's close
as a receiver out of the backfield. And while Meggett will solve some
problems (especially punt and/or kickoff returns) he still will not be able
to carry the load as the feature back. I still question spending one
million dollars for a backup player on the worst team in football (unless
he renegotiates a substantially lower price somewhere down the line).
/Don
|
56.1717 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Mon Feb 27 1995 14:28 | 10 |
| |as a receiver out of the backfield. And while Meggett will solve some
|problems (especially punt and/or kickoff returns) he still will not be able
|to carry the load as the feature back. I still question spending one
I agree. This is key. I do feel, however, that in the world of mediocre to
good running backs, Leroy Thompson is as good as any of them. Until someone
outstanding comes along, I think Thompson could be their featured back, while I
doubt very much that Meggett can.
=Bob=
|
56.1718 | | MKFSA::LONG | Let your tongue hang out. Stay cool. | Mon Feb 27 1995 14:48 | 13 |
| I really can't see a team placing their future in Meggett's hands
(and legs) at this point in his career. Thompson was a great pick
for them last year. (I hated to see the Steelers loose him!)
Maybe a speedster in the draft is their best best.
re "worst team in the NFL":
/er, I think you're being a 'little' tough on the Patsies.
billl
|
56.1719 | Another guy | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:00 | 7 |
| >> re "worst team in the NFL":
>> /er, I think you're being a 'little' tough on the Patsies.
I think this was in reference to the Patriots offer to
the defensive lineman from Houston ... $400k salary and
$600k signing bonus to a backup with 20 career tackles ..
|
56.1720 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Georgetown > Sorryexcuse | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:00 | 5 |
|
I think Slasher meant the Giants when he said worst team in the league
but it was a fraudian slip he meant worst coach in the league........
mike
|
56.1721 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:04 | 14 |
|
Parcells is taking a calculated risk that he'll get Turner
for less than $750,000. If he doesn't get him, he'll get the
fifth rounder instead which probably more than a pass catching
fullback is worth to Bill. Gash seems to be more of Parcells'
punishing type full back. Either way, I wouldn't be surprised
to see Turner back next year.
In other news - nice to see the Patsies set Tim Goad's mind
at ease ( at least *reportedly) by letting him know that he's
their man at nose tackle. Goad's a solid player who has been
here through the very lean years and deserves to be here now
that things have turned for the better.
|
56.1722 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:09 | 14 |
|
| In other news - nice to see the Patsies set Tim Goad's mind
| at ease ( at least *reportedly) by letting him know that he's
| their man at nose tackle. Goad's a solid player who has been
| here through the very lean years and deserves to be here now
| that things have turned for the better.
I like Goad, but to me he is one of the people Parcells refers to when he says
he needs to get more size on either side of the ball. Goad will do fine as long
as the Pats stay with the 3-4 defense, but if they pick up a good d-lineman, I'd
like to see them switch to 4-3. If they do this, Goad is just too small to play
tackle.
=bob=
|
56.1723 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Fleet <fill in the blank> | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:24 | 13 |
| That's another thing about Parcells. His fascination/obsession
with size borders on latent... Well I had better shut up lest we start
another "vertically challenged" type of controversy here in ::SPROTS.
Suffuice to say that Stepnoski is the best center in the NFL whether or not
he tips the scale at the desired (for Parcells anyway), 300 pound minimum.
We all saw how bulk and size (Marion Butts) helped the running game last
year.
/Don
P.S. Yes Mike the Giants may have been the worst team last
year in terms of talent, but the coaching of DAN REEVES
led to an astonishing 8-8 season.
|
56.1724 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:31 | 7 |
| Yabut, as much as it pains me, it one of those "beat 'em or join 'em" thangs
with the NFL. All the teams are putting these immobile 300 pounders on the
line, so there is no denying that a 260-280 pound defensive tackle will have his
hands full when the guy throws a straight ahead block on him. Quickness will
only get you so far.
=bob=
|
56.1725 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:39 | 8 |
| > Parcells is taking a calculated risk that he'll get Turner
> for less than $750,000. If he doesn't get him, he'll get the
> fifth rounder instead which probably more than a pass catching
> fullback is worth to Bill.
Given 3rd-rounders only have a 50% shot at making an NFL team, that's
like saying Turner isn't worth anything. If that's true, why even
offer $750K ?
|
56.1726 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:50 | 5 |
|
>> If that's true, why even offer $750K ?
He's not offering him $750,000. That's the crux of the whole
discussion.
|
56.1727 | Who knows, but so far you can't argue too much with results | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Mon Feb 27 1995 15:58 | 18 |
|
At anything over $1M/year (much less $2M) I think that Meggett is a
mistake. That one has "love affair with aging Giant" written all over
it. This could be Parcells' one weak spot as it did appear that he
spent too much on a few of these types last year, which might have
limited his flexibility for this season.
I too thought that Kevin Turner was a Parcells-type guy all the way,
and supposedly one of the brighter young talents who'd be around here
a while. Hopefully he still will be. I don't think that Parcells is
that enamored of youth, though. Although not to the same extreme he
seems to be just as content to do the George Allen veteran plug-in
thing than work with younger projects. I still think that he's one
of the greatest game coaches that ever lived but no front-office
genius.
glenn
|
56.1728 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Feb 27 1995 16:02 | 11 |
|
>> as the Pats stay with the 3-4 defense, but if they pick up a good
>> d-lineman, I'd like to see them switch to 4-3. If they do this, Goad
>> is just too small to play tackle.
I don't see the Pats switching to a 4-3 any time soon. Linebacker is
their deepest position with Brown, Slade, Sabb, McGinest, Moore, Collins
and even Bavarro. Of course, some of those guys could be trade bait if
the Pats did switch but Parcells had the 3-4 when he had the Giants'
great defensive teams so I don't see that happening.
|
56.1729 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Feb 27 1995 16:34 | 6 |
| > I still think that he's one
> of the greatest game coaches that ever lived but no front-office
> genius.
He didn't want Rodney Hampton. Young had to pick him over Parcells
objections.
|
56.1730 | 4-3 possibility | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Tue Feb 28 1995 09:16 | 9 |
| RE.1729
Tommie,
I thought I had read one of the D-linemen (A. Jones?) say that the
Pats might be playing more 4-3 this year. The player said that right
now in the 3-4 he was a part time player and expected to be paid as
such but if they do play a 4-3 this year he wants more bucks because he
would play more. It was in last weeks Globe.
Mike
|
56.1731 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Feb 28 1995 11:59 | 12 |
|
>> I thought I had read one of the D-linemen (A. Jones?) say that the
>> Pats might be playing more 4-3 this year. The player said that right
>> now in the 3-4 he was a part time player and expected to be paid as
>> such but if they do play a 4-3 this year he wants more bucks because he
>> would play more. It was in last weeks Globe.
I remember reading that. I thought it was purely speculative and that
Jones (not sure either) was basically saying that he was satisfied with
his salary and not worried about any new arrivals. Right now, the
Pats just don't have the personnel to play the 4-3. Not sure if they
have the desire to either.
|
56.1732 | Turner's agent earned his money | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass to the Final Four! | Tue Feb 28 1995 12:51 | 6 |
| Turner got an offer of $1.375 million from the Eagles? WOW!!! Good
luck to him! He's a nice player, bet certainly not worth that kind of
money. Gash is a slightly better blocker, and third down backs out of
the backfield are a dime a dozen.
NAZZ
|
56.1733 | What's the nfl cap these days? | AKOCOA::BREEN | You took me by surprise, I'm afraid | Tue Feb 28 1995 13:42 | 1 |
|
|
56.1734 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Feb 28 1995 14:01 | 7 |
56.1735 | Or, just maybe he's a damn good football player | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 28 1995 14:37 | 24 |
|
> Turner got an offer of $1.375 million from the Eagles? WOW!!! Good
> luck to him! He's a nice player, bet certainly not worth that kind of
> money. Gash is a slightly better blocker, and third down backs out of
> the backfield are a dime a dozen.
While Turner is not worth that amount to the Patriots, at the same time
you could also say that this offer does reflect to some degree his
true value, as that of a very good football player. Which then begs the
question of why almost no effort was given to resigning one of the few
talented _young_ players on the team before it came to this point.
I disagree that pass-catching fullbacks like Turner are a dime a dozen.
I don't think there are that many of them, and there's no indication
that Gash has that type of ability, to serve either as a blocker or a
pass-catcher on non-obvious passing downs (situations that the Pats do
often pass from). Combined with the possibility of Thompson leaving and
Butts' status as an over-the-hill stiff, the Pats might be turning over
just about the entire backfield. Given the rushing production that's
not so bad but I would have figured that Turner would be the one guy
they'd want to keep...
glenn
|
56.1736 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Tue Feb 28 1995 15:07 | 4 |
| | Butts' status as an over-the-hill stiff, the Pats might be turning over
| just about the entire backfield. Given the rushing production that's
Hopefully losing Turner will prompt them to sign Thompson.
|
56.1737 | Big bucks for a part time back | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Tue Feb 28 1995 15:15 | 6 |
| Turner's offer of 1.375 mill+ a 1.25 mill signing bonus works out to a
cap salary of about 1.9 mill per year. Gash is earning a lot less then
that which is probably why the Pats won't match it. I think the Pats
could use that money in other areas.
Mike
|
56.1738 | /Don had it pegged way back; what was the thinking here? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 28 1995 15:28 | 13 |
|
> Turner's offer of 1.375 mill+ a 1.25 mill signing bonus works out to a
> cap salary of about 1.9 mill per year. Gash is earning a lot less then
> that which is probably why the Pats won't match it. I think the Pats
> could use that money in other areas.
But the question was whether he was worth less than half that, $750K
for just one season, no? Wasn't that the price where the prohibitive
draft pick compensation kicked in? Obviously the Eagles are saying
that any decision at $750K would be a no-brainer, for them...
glenn
|
56.1739 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Feb 28 1995 16:48 | 17 |
|
Losing Turner is a minor setback not a colossal blunder.
Philly and Washington aren't known lately for their stellar
personnel moves either but I seriously doubt that either of
them would have given up a first rounder *and* 1+ million a
year for Turner. Kevin, like Marv Cook, is a very good player
who just isn't a Parcells-type guys. Bill is smashmouth. Kevin
may be the least smashmouth fullback in the league. Also
Kevin made his pass catching rep on the most pass happy
team in the league. Whether he'll be as effective or as
busy on a Philly or a Washington remains to be seen. $750,000
for a third down back? Not Big Tuna. By the same token, if
Big Tuna gives Dave Meggett the two mil that he's looking for,
Bill deserves to be locked up. It's the Butts mistake times
two.
|
56.1740 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Georgetown > Sorryexcuse | Wed Mar 01 1995 09:16 | 9 |
|
well it's Butts times two in some people's opinion cause my paper said
the Pats offered Meggett more than Giants who put forth a 1.8 million
a year package earlier this week.
Given Meggett's gamebreaking ability on kickoff and punt returns, pass
catching and running ability I doubt it's Butts times two........
mike
|
56.1741 | For the talent level, don't think they're getting money's worth | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Wed Mar 01 1995 10:00 | 19 |
|
> well it's Butts times two in some people's opinion cause my paper said
> the Pats offered Meggett more than Giants who put forth a 1.8 million
> a year package earlier this week.
Is it the 4-year deal, too? That'd be the biggest concern; Meggett
is 29 this year.
I don't think that the $750K to keep Turner is at all outrageous when
you consider that it is the average NFL salary (a manageable figure
under the cap), and that guys like Ricky Reynolds and Myron Guyton are
pulling down $1.5M/per. I asked the question earlier this year of
where all this young longterm talent is on the Pats, and Turner's was
one of only 7-8 names to come up. Besides Bledsoe's obviously large
salary, exactly where is all the money going that the Pats have so
little maneuverability under the salary cap?
glenn
|
56.1742 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 01 1995 10:25 | 18 |
|
>> I don't think that the $750K to keep Turner is at all outrageous when
>> you consider that it is the average NFL salary (a manageable figure
>> under the cap),
It is not outrageous but when you've already admitted that he's not
the answer to your running woes, that he's a third down back who
does what Meggett does but probably not as well and you've got
a dozen+ other free agents to deal with and other needs to fill,
Kevin is a goner.
>> and that guys like Ricky Reynolds and Myron Guyton are pulling down
>> $1.5M/per.
Cover men are alot harder to come by than backs and alot more valued
by Parcells.
|
56.1743 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Jumblay,Crawfish pie, filet gumbo | Wed Mar 01 1995 10:35 | 6 |
| I've heard the comparison between Meggett and Turner several times and
I'm at a loss. Turner is a big fullback, a fully competent blocker and
inside rush man with the added ability to catch the ball.
Meggett is a speed guy, open field and again pass catching ability. I
would have him and Turner in the backfield at the same time.
|
56.1744 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Bustings over, changed again.. | Wed Mar 01 1995 11:30 | 14 |
|
I think people are over estimating Kevin Turners talent and worth
to the Patriots. On a team that averaged 2.9 YPC, how can you say
ANYBODY is a good blocker? Last time I looked Turner wasn't exactly
Speedy Gonzalez. Sure he is a good receiver, who does VERY LITTLE after
the catch. I vision a third down receiver being someone like a Ricky
Watters of SF. He makes the catch and then can run with the ball
afterwards. Where Kevin Turnver catches the ball and just trys to run
over people. Sure you'll get 10 yrds here and there, he'll never break
a long one for a TD though. You need players on your team that every
time they touch the ball. They have a chance to score a TD. I don't
see Turner as that type of player.
Ron
|
56.1745 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Fleet <fill in the blank> | Wed Mar 01 1995 12:07 | 9 |
| � I think people are over estimating Kevin Turners talent and worth
� to the Patriots. On a team that averaged 2.9 YPC, how can you say
� ANYBODY is a good blocker?
I would say Turner and Gash are very good blockers. Ever watch
Marion Butts run? The guy has no concept of following a lead blocker into
the hole.
/Don
|
56.1746 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 01 1995 12:13 | 12 |
|
>> Turner is a big fullback, a fully competent blocker and inside
>> rush man with the added ability to catch the ball.
If Turner was all that, he'd be the one getting the 2+ mil not
Meggett. I'll give you everything but the inside rushing part.
I think he's better aftee he catches the ball than Scott does,
but he's not a punishing runner by any stretch of the imagination.
BTW - it certainly didn't hurt Turner that he had Coates to take
alot of the heat off. Let's see what happens when *he's*
the man.
|
56.1747 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Perch, SS 176, In Memoriam | Wed Mar 01 1995 12:16 | 7 |
| I'm gettin' old and my memory ain't what it used to be....
Coates was going after some sort of receptions record -- did he get it?
'saw
|
56.1748 | Okay, where _is_ the talent coming from then? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Wed Mar 01 1995 13:05 | 21 |
|
While the loss of Turner may not be a big deal, I still believe that it
may be syptomatic of a potential problem. Turner was after all a
recent high-round draft pick (and a player at least one team thought
very highly of). The Patriots don't have a whole lot of recent
high-round draft picks doing much for them (now add Turner to the list
with Rod Smith, the second player taken in the expansion draft and one
of the few young, low-salaried guys of any ability available). Even in
this era of free agency, I'm not convinced that the way to get ahead is
to turn over a good part of your team every other year with veteran
free agents (which was the point with Reynolds and Guyton-- who combined
enjoyed a fair amount of pine time for their $3M/year-- their salary and
status, not their positions; meanwhile a decent contributor in Harlon
Barnett had to walk apparently because the money for that part of the
team had already been spent).
Until there's a real talent infusion this team could very easily level
off, or even backslide, quickly...
glenn
|
56.1749 | Perhaps sessions watching old Packer films would help | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Wed Mar 01 1995 13:54 | 7 |
| Say what you want about Butts, he did do it elsewhere and noone, Turner
included (right T) ever ran the ball for the Pats last year.
I say that the pass needs to come off the run to be successful. If the
run is the "exception" then it is too easily tipped off. Bledsoe has
to practice this phase of his game, the deception part; for him a
running play is like bunting was for Boggs.
|
56.1750 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 01 1995 15:43 | 13 |
| >> Even in this era of free agency, I'm not convinced that the way to
>> get ahead is to turn over a good part of your team every other year
>> with veteran free agents
Tell it to the SB champion Niners. This is life with the cap and
free agency. You spend all of your money on you frontline/star
players and pay everyone else as little as possible. In Turner's
case that meant less than $750,000, probably *much* less. Guys like
Turner have to be considered impact players or they don't get paid.
With Bledsoe, Coates, Meggett (?), Timpson and whoever we come out
of the draft with, Turner is no impact player especially not on a
Parcells team.
|
56.1751 | So why are these mediocre imports making so much dough? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Wed Mar 01 1995 16:27 | 18 |
|
> Tell it to the SB champion Niners. This is life with the cap and
> free agency. You spend all of your money on you frontline/star
> players and pay everyone else as little as possible.
Like I said, let me know when the Pats start bringing in some
frontline/star players like the 49ers did (with a much better talent
base to begin with) for their $33M's worth. I'm not talking about
more players like Kratch, Guyton, Reynolds, Butts, Aaron Jones, Mike
Pitts, this guy from the Oilers Tim Roberts or even Meggett for that
matter. The NFL _makes_ you spend the $30M whether you get quality
or not; there's no rule that you have to spend it on someone else's
unwanted mediocre veterans instead of your own players, though. This
is the context from which I'm evaluating the loss of Turner: what are
the Pats bringing in return?
glenn
|
56.1752 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 01 1995 16:56 | 19 |
| >> there's no rule that you have to spend it on someone else's
>> unwanted mediocre veterans instead of your own players, though.
Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two
years and as Pats fan I was delighted. Bill said when he took
over that he knew what had to be done and who he'd need to
get it done with. Obviously, Turner is probably not one of the
folks that he feels he needs to get it done. If Bill uses the
dough that he didn't spend on Turner and Butts and uses it to
sign Dellenbach and Meggett, I feel pretty secure that we'll
be able to take the next step towards the SB.
>> This is the context from which I'm evaluating the loss of Turner:
>> what are the Pats bringing in return?
I think the context that you need to be looking at in is the afore-
mentioned show of progress and not the loss of a single somewhat
talented player.
|
56.1753 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Wed Mar 01 1995 17:00 | 5 |
| Butts future is not clear yet. I think the Pats will wait to see
if they can sign Thompson, Meggett, and/or somebody else before
they decide if they want to bring him back.
=bob=
|
56.1754 | This is not a young team at key positions, by any stretch | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Wed Mar 01 1995 17:19 | 20 |
|
> Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
> and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two
> years and as Pats fan I was delighted.
I have complete confidence in Parcells' ability to get the absolute
most out of what he's got to work with. Unfortunately there'll be
a limit to how far a team like that can go. I just can't share your
optimism that the addition of a Dellenbach and Meggett gets the Pats
anywhere near a Super Bowl championship, now or in the future. Some
of these guys are only getting older by the minute, which is the part
that makes the decisions most confusing. Butts, Reynolds, Meggett,
Guyton, Pitts, Jones, Kratch, DeOssie, Dellenbach (not to mention
holdovers Armstrong, Goad, Vincent Brown): they are all over 30 or
pushing it, and just about have to win right now, this upcoming season,
to have any chance at it at all. There can be a definite downside to
the kind of improvement built on older veterans: a sudden relapse.
glenn
|
56.1755 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Mar 01 1995 21:24 | 32 |
|
> Parcells took the unwanted mediocre veterans that you listed
> and turned the Pats into a playoff team in the space of two
> years and as Pats fan I was delighted. Bill said when he took
It's not always what you did, but what you could/should have done.
Look, I mean, really look at the 5-11 record of '93-'94 vs. the
10-6 '94-'95 record.
5 games better, 5 games that without Scott "Missin'" Sisson, we would
have won (and if you ask, I'll give you the game-by-game gory details)
in the previous year.
In my opinion, the Pats only improved this last year because of Matt
Bahr. Everything else pretty much stayed the same.
I agree that the Pats' coaching has left MUCH to be desired. And
Parcells has given the team the conditioning and discipline it sadly
needed.
But Why is Bill doing the personnel? He's just not getting it --
Sisson, Butts, a few others. He's a great coach, but a lousy scout.
And we're losing the Free Agent war once again. Plus - losing Chung and
Turner is indefensible.
I hate to sound unappreciative for Bill. But I don't think he's great
at every job. Let someone else pick the people, and then let him
coach - that's what worked in NY.
- Sean
|
56.1756 | Giants of the North | WILLEE::MAILLOUX | | Thu Mar 02 1995 12:03 | 8 |
|
Just heard on EEI, that the Pats have signed Meggett and will
make the announcement tomorrow. No details!
RM
|
56.1757 | the sky ain't falling | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Mar 02 1995 12:10 | 26 |
|
>> -< This is not a young team at key positions, by any stretch >-
You've got the best young QB in the league in coming into his third
year. The best young tight end in the league will be in his fourth.
You're team leader in sacks will be in his fourth. McGinest should
be improved in his second year. The receiving corps is young although
I wish they would have kept Hawkins. Tim Roberts is a young behomoth.
That most of the rest of the team is reaching the twilight of their
careers speaks more to the drafting acumen previous regime than any
love that Parcells has of veterans. He just didn't have that many
folks worth keeping when he took over not a bagful of draft picks a
la Jimmy Johnson at Dallas. Year by year, Parcells has upgraded when
and where he could, that's good enough for me. *I* too was skeptical
about a lot of his personnel moves and still am but this latest
round makes sense to me.
>> I just can't share your optimism that the addition of a Dellenbach
>> and Meggett gets the Pats anywhere near a Super Bowl championship,
>> now or in the future.
The first step was to *get* to the playoffs. The next step is to
progress in the playoffs. Dellenbach and Meggett fill two dire needs
and should energize the Pats anemic running game. I think we're
ready to take that next step.
|
56.1758 | Lotta dough for a near-30-year-old specialist... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Thu Mar 02 1995 12:26 | 19 |
|
> The first step was to *get* to the playoffs. The next step is to
> progress in the playoffs. Dellenbach and Meggett fill two dire needs
> and should energize the Pats anemic running game. I think we're
> ready to take that next step.
I thought you said that Parcells should be locked up if he gives
Meggett his $2M? It's actually much worse than that; the numbers are
reportedly $10M for four years, about $4M up front and guaranteed if
Meggett plays just this year, again for a 29-year-old special-teams
and 3rd-down specialist (who does very little for the actual running
game). This sounds like blessing by coronation; whomever Parcells
wants must be worth it. Sure, he could turn out to be right, but
given the personnel record so far I don't think it's any sure thing,
under the salary cap contraints. Meggett is a very good player but
_not_ (or no longer, if you insist) a frontline star in my estimation.
glenn
|
56.1759 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Lernin' me agin! | Thu Mar 02 1995 12:51 | 12 |
|
>> You've got the best young QB in the league in coming into his third
>> year. The best young tight end in the league will be in his fourth.
And when that QB comes back down to earth this year, the Pats will be
once again a .500 team.
Sure, potentially he'll be a great one, but unachieved potential shows
up a lot in the NFL.
JaKe
|
56.1760 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Mar 02 1995 16:32 | 15 |
| >> I thought you said that Parcells should be locked up if he gives
>> Meggett his $2M?
I think it's way too much. For that kind of dough, Meggett
will be doing more than catching the ball out of the back-
field on third down and returning kicks. He'll probably be
platooning with Russell or whoever the other back(s) are.
It's too a hefty price but that doesn't negate the fact that
Meggett will be a pretty big plus as will Dellenbach. In
getting hung up on this youth kick, you're forgetting that
Bill is no kid himself and has a bad ticker. This isn't
going to be his life's work. If I had to guess, I'd think
that we're on the third year of a 4-5 year plan.
|
56.1761 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Thu Mar 02 1995 16:47 | 8 |
| Kick returning was a weakness, and Thompson was adequate on 3rd
downs, but signing Meggett does not address the issue of the team
lacking a go-to running back. Personally, I think Thompson could
fill that role, but I suspect that with the money spent on Meggett,
that they will be unable to compensate Thompson to the level he
expects.
=bob=
|
56.1762 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Melrose Place > Friends | Thu Mar 02 1995 17:42 | 7 |
|
Meggett had some games last year where he started and averaged 80 + yards
on the ground for those games. It's his durability as a feature back that
is the question mark plus his value on returns made the Giants not want to
feature him that much. Besides Rodney is a horse when he's healthy........
mike
|
56.1763 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Perch, SS 176, In Memoriam | Fri Mar 03 1995 09:46 | 17 |
| Bottom line, George Young blew this deal.
What we're seeing with George Young is basically someone who turned the
Giants around, brought two championships to the house, but has not been
able to adapt to the new times with the salary cap and free agency.
It's time the now skinny (but death warmed over) George Young step aside.
What the Patriots have is someone who can and probably will be one of the
emotional leaders of the team. Can he be the feature back? I'm not sure.
Can he do lots of things, all of them fairly well? Most probably.
Just wait till you guys play the Redskins. Meggett is a Redskin killer!
'Saw
|
56.1765 | At what price should Young not have "blown" this? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Fri Mar 03 1995 10:06 | 22 |
|
> Bottom line, George Young blew this deal.
I don't think so. The Pats gave Meggett $10M, with $3M guaranteed in
bonuses, so Meggett collects half the contract value if he plays just
one year. I sincerely question the wisdom of that kind of deal. Fact
is, George Young almost matched it, but you can only go so far. I
think the Giants will be better off in the long run. In their
particular situation already having a very good back in Rodney Hampton,
they effectively let a great veteran punt returner and 3rd-down
specialist get away, at the cost of $10M.
Let's not forget, either, that like Hampton, coming out of the draft,
Meggett was a player that Young liked, and Parcells didn't (the quote
I heard repeated yesterday was "what am I going to do with a 5'7"
RB?"). I think you're going to any lengths to criticize the
Young/Reeves regime, 'Saw. The Giants really are in a rebuilding
period and spending $10M on a 29-year-old Dave Meggett just doesn't fit
with that.
glenn
|
56.1766 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Mar 03 1995 10:19 | 6 |
| Saw,
I only saw the Giants play twice last year. Will Megget give the Pats
the same as Metcalf gives the Browns? As far as I'm concerned that
would be enough for me
Mike
|
56.1767 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Perch, SS 176, In Memoriam | Fri Mar 03 1995 11:23 | 45 |
| I'm not going to great lengths to criticize Young.
George Young is a dinosaur who is incapable of dealing with free agency
and the cap. Even the Giants hired him an assistant to do that stuff because
George can't get it done any more....
George Young caused mega-problems in the first year of the FA thing,
especially with the offensive line, by letting things go. He could have
re-signed some players before they became free agents, but he let it go.
As such, the offensive line suffered, and lost a lot of depth.
Megget:
As to my ringing endorsement, I was only trying to point out that he's
a jack of all trades. He's a solid player, who will bring leadership
and multi capabilities to the team.
Is he an Emmitt Smith/Walter Payton/Barry Sanders? No. Like Mikey
Childs, I don't know about his durability, but he filled in fine last
season while Rodney was down.
He plays extremely well against the Redskins -- he's thrown like three
TD passes against them the last two seasons. That's always fun to watch.
I'm not really sure what Metcalf brings to the Browns, since I didn't
watch the Browns that much. Meggett will bring 3rd down capability, sure,
but he's also good on returns, has good hands and decent speed.
As to George Young getting the Giants a game away from the playoffs, please,
don't patronize me. If George Young had done as well at general managing
the Giants as he did at losing all that weight, they'd have made the playoffs.
Instead, he's made a miserable mess of dealing with his free agents.
One can only hope that the guy either kicks the bucket (and man, he looks
like he's two breaths away) or retires soon....
'Saw
|
56.1768 | Whither Kevin Lee? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Fri Mar 03 1995 11:40 | 12 |
|
One other comment on the Meggett signing: where does that leave
high-2nd round pick of a year ago, Kevin Lee? I honestly don't know
what Lee's prospects are or ever were before he got hurt last year,
but in function he seemed to be almost dead-on for Meggett's current
role. There will still be some use for him if he's any good, certainly,
but likely not the value commiserate with yet another high draft
pick.
glenn
|
56.1769 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Melrose Place > Friends | Fri Mar 03 1995 12:00 | 2 |
|
I thought Lee was a WR?
|
56.1771 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Mar 03 1995 12:05 | 13 |
|
> One other comment on the Meggett signing: where does that leave
> high-2nd round pick of a year ago, Kevin Lee? I honestly don't know
> what Lee's prospects are or ever were before he got hurt last year,
> but in function he seemed to be almost dead-on for Meggett's current
> role.
Lee is a speedy wide receiver. Meggett is a RB/Kick returner. That
doesn't seem dead on to me. Lee might return kick offs, there's
room for two of them back there but how this leaves Lee out in the
cold requires a bit of a reach.
|
56.1772 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Melrose Place > Friends | Fri Mar 03 1995 12:06 | 7 |
|
>> Don't know why you're so obsessed with Young's weight. It's
>> irrelevant. And the seven game tailspin wasn't George's fault.
agreed. So who's fault was it??????
;^)
|
56.1773 | Pats receiving corps may change some | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass to the Final Four! | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:09 | 11 |
| I will bet the Pats do not re-sign Timpson. Some team will throw a
million $+ contract at him, and Parcells will wave goodbye. That would
free up some money to sign a guy like Ricky Proehl (although he might
be harder to get away from Phoenix now that Miami signed Randall
(Thrill) Hill away from them). If the Pats do get Proehl, he would
team with Brisby, Lee, and Crittendon to be an above average wide
receiver group that will be made to look better than they are by having
Meggett come out of the backfield and Coates as a major weapon at tight
end.
NAZZ
|
56.1774 | Jug Ears Young.... | CAMONE::WAY | USS Perch, SS 176, In Memoriam | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:17 | 49 |
| >
> >> I'm not going to great lengths to criticize Young.
>
> You're way over here in the Pats note doing it.
My point exactly. This note came up before the Giants note did so
I figured I'd same myself some distance....8^)
Seriously, I think it is appropriate to discuss here.
> Didn't say that. Merely pointed out that for all the grousing
> about Young's personnel moves, the Ginats were just one game
> away from the playoffs.
It's the moves he doesn't make when he needs to that are thep problem.
Again, if he had done his job well, the Giant might have made the
playoffs (in spite of Dan Reeves)....
If he had done, or was doing his job well, the wouldn't have brought in
an assistant to deal with cap issues.....
> Don't know why you're so obsessed with Young's weight. It's
> irrelevant. And the seven game tailspin wasn't George's fault.
I'm not obsessed with his weight. I can just think up more wiseass
remarks to make about his weight than I can about thos funky glasses
he wears or his big ears... I mean, we're talking big ol' jug ears.
I mean, we're talking jug ears that put Lyndon Johnson's jug ears to
shame!
> >> One can only hope that the guy either kicks the bucket
>
> I know you don't mean this. At least, I hope you don't.
No I don't. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Well, hardly anyone.
But seriously, the guy is becoming a dinosaur is is proving on a daily
basis that he's not capable of working WELL within this system that
exists now in the NFL....
'Saw
|
56.1775 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Baseball owners, den of inequity | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:45 | 27 |
|
> Lee is a speedy wide receiver. Meggett is a RB/Kick returner. That
> doesn't seem dead on to me. Lee might return kick offs, there's
> room for two of them back there but how this leaves Lee out in the
> cold requires a bit of a reach.
Lee may be listed as a WR but I thought he was pegged as a 3rd-down
flanker type like Meggett. When you rush the ball as little
as Meggett has, they can call you a RB but you're very close to
the same thing. The only way I see Lee fitting now is if he indeed
can become a more conventional starting WR. I could be totally wrong,
that could work out, but I had thought he was a flanker at Alabama
and was considered too small to play a true WR.
Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
Phil Simms? Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per? Bob Kratch? Pepper Johnson?
BFD. The whole point to the salary cap is that you can't pay everyone
the $2M that they want. When you're coming off some great seasons but
have already started to slip, you can _expect_ to lose name veterans
like that. It's part of the game now. You could do the 49ers thing
(which wouldn't have worked for the Giants anyway), but we've had that
debate; I don't think you can expect a team to usurp the system. When
a team's getting old like that and slipping anyway, it's best to just
move on rather than spend yourself into a further slide.
glenn
|
56.1776 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:48 | 12 |
| Heard some of the press conferance driving back from a meeting.
Tuna said that he wouldn't use Meggett as a regular kick-off
returner. He said he will be a punt returner, and play back. He
expects him to be on the field about 400-450 plays.
Tuna also said that he doesn't know how the team is going to look
next year. The guys who are free agents are "not his players"
anymore, and that he is not counting on any of them to sign. I
didn't hear it, but he was supposed to have side-stepped a question
about Marion Butts' future with the team.
=bob=
|
56.1777 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | Dean > Bumhiem | Fri Mar 03 1995 13:59 | 14 |
| re: Young and the Giants
They did the right thing with Simms. He *might* have gotten them to the
playoffs, where they would have been trashed by either SF or Dallas (if
they won their 1st game). Instead, they save his money, determine that
Brown IS their QB for the next 10 years, and miss the playoffs on a tie-
breaker. This year their good, young WR (?) should emerge, and I expect
their offense to be better. They'll be in the playoff hunt again.
re: Meggett getting 400-450 plays
I'll believe it when I see it. Parcells' biggest problem was getting
the 'tough yard' when he had to. Meggett ain't gonna get it for him.
|
56.1778 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Mar 03 1995 14:29 | 15 |
| >> I could be totally wrong, that could work out, but I had thought
>> he was a flanker at Alabama and was considered too small to play
>> a true WR.
Sounds like you have him confused with David Palmer who was Mr.
Everything at Alabama. He was the guy for whom size was a question
and the probable reason why he wasn't taken higher.
>> Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
>> Phil Simms? Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per? Bob Kratch? Pepper Johnson?
>> BFD.
Bart Oates was the only ex-Giant that I can recall from the Pro
Bowl.
|
56.1779 | Kevin Lee | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Mar 03 1995 14:48 | 4 |
|
He's *at least* 6'2" - I'm not sure about his weight. Height is certainly
not a problem with him.
|
56.1780 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Perch, SS 176, In Memoriam | Fri Mar 03 1995 14:49 | 33 |
| | >> Who are all these great free agents that George Young has punted on?
| >> Phil Simms? Myron Guyton at $1.5M/per? Bob Kratch? Pepper Johnson?
| >> BFD.
|
| Bart Oates was the only ex-Giant that I can recall from the Pro
| Bowl.
Oates and Kratch added depth to the o-line. One of the biggest problems
the Giants had this year was Brian Williams tipping the plays with his
stance. Oates would not have made that mistake. I'd have taken Kratch
over the guy they had at guard this season.... The guy who hurt his
knee when someone jumped on him after one of the games finished... Can't
remember his name.
Pepper Johnson wasn't a George Young fiasco -- Reeves cut him outright
because he couldn't stand having him shooting his mouth off in the locker
room. Wasn't Pepper one of the leading tacklers on this Browns this year?
They let Mark Collins get away, and should have kept him because the corners
were suspect this season especially.
As to the rest, I'll have to look them up.
And I still say that if George Young is so great, they wouldn't have
gotten him an "assistant" to handle salary cap issues....
The game has passed ol' Jug Ears by......
'Saw
|
56.1781 | HTH | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 07 1995 11:31 | 2 |
|
Glen, this is the part where you pop in and say, "Oh? Never mind."
|
56.1782 | Could be a steal | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Wed Mar 29 1995 17:33 | 6 |
|
I just heard a rumor about Herschel Walker comming to the Pats as a
1-2 down back. Is this a joke or is there something to it?
Jerry
|
56.1783 | Still a great one | MASALA::DWALLACE | | Wed Mar 29 1995 18:03 | 3 |
| He'd be the ideal solution to their RB problem. Block, run & pass
catcher for tink bucks. I'd say go for it ....if SF don't beat you
to it.
|
56.1784 | isfh | OUTSRC::HEISER | next year in Jerusalem! | Mon Apr 03 1995 20:04 | 1 |
56.1785 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Money + Boredom = MJ | Tue Apr 04 1995 10:32 | 7 |
|
Patriots also signed a WR. Who played for the Calgary Stampeders
the last 3 seasons.
Parcells has now added three 300+ pound players to the team. In
Dellanbach, Roberts, and White (Not the good Reggie).
Ron
|
56.1786 | | TOOK::HALPIN | TIMEOUT!!! oops, never mind... | Tue Apr 04 1995 12:15 | 15 |
|
>WOW! REGGIE WHITE IS NOW ON THE PATS!!
Sorry Mike, not 'The Reggie White". This guy was a backup
with the Chargers. Drafted in the 6th round in '92 out of
N.C. A&T.
White has been told he is expected to play Nose Tackle,
a position he's nevered played. Tim Goad apparently is done
has a Patriot. He's expected to sign with Cleveland for
$1 Million....
JimH
|
56.1787 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | next year in Jerusalem! | Tue Apr 04 1995 12:36 | 1 |
56.1788 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal Patrol | Tue Apr 04 1995 13:19 | 1 |
| If Cleveland is signing Goad, then I guess they don't want Howard....
|
56.1789 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Apr 04 1995 14:21 | 21 |
|
>> Tim Goad apparently is done has a Patriot. He's expected to sign
>> with Cleveland for $1 Million....
It's because of things like this that I have no affinity or sympathy
for the management of sports franchises. Here's a guy who literally
bled for the Pats and who has done a solid job for them his entire
career. He's been here through what can mildly be put as the 'lean
years' and he was looking forward to much better times. But now he
doesn't fit into one of managements neat little profiles of what size
someone who plays his position should be so there is no room at the
inn for Tim Goad. Tim's proven himself here and yet they won't pay
him what they're paying folks who haven't proven themseleves anywhere.
As is usually the case loyalty is a one way street in professional
sports and that's why I loved today's front page article in the
Globe about how badly the baseball owners screwed themselves this
past year. The rich get richer and the poor get the picture, but
not always. Sometimes we get a good belly laugh at their expense.
I hope Goad gets what he deserves and that's certainly to be treated
much better than Parcells and the Pats have treated him.
|
56.1790 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | L.T. - What a Man! | Tue Apr 04 1995 15:12 | 7 |
| Here, here Thomas. Also what's this I hear about the Macroni and
Cheese man charging an outrageous surcharge fee to certain ticket agencies
for "preferred seats"? Could this be a presage of things to come with us
"regular" (i.e. pre-Parcells) season ticket holders? Could it be that some
rust is starting to appear on the White Knight's armor?
/Don
|
56.1791 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Play ball!! | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:34 | 12 |
| > As is usually the case loyalty is a one way street in professional
> sports...
I don't even think the road is even open anymore. It has been
overgrown with weeds and filled with potholes! That's the point I
was trying to make with the entry a few days ago in the Pirate note.
Loyalty from either the player, or the owner, is only as far as the
checkbook can stretch it, or the talent is still peaking.
billl
|
56.1792 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Don'tCallMeFishRookie! | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:54 | 9 |
| There was never any loyalty in sports. Owners treated players like
pieces of meat on a hook in the Golden Age of Sports. Now that players have
a modicum of leverage, unlike the "good old days" when they were basically
indentured servants, owners appeal to fans sense of the loss of loyalty to
the franchise. Course these same owners would pack up and leave these fans
in a nanosecond if they could find a sweetheart of a deal like Georgia
Frontiere got from the lemmings in Saint Louis.
/Don
|
56.1793 | the baseball players were right | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Apr 05 1995 13:27 | 24 |
|
> I don't even think the road is even open anymore. It has been
> overgrown with weeds and filled with potholes! That's the point I
> was trying to make with the entry a few days ago in the Pirate note.
> Loyalty from either the player, or the owner, is only as far as the
> checkbook can stretch it, or the talent is still peaking.
That's not the case with Goad. He desperately wants to remain a
Patriot and has said as much. And even though he has a million dollar
offer I'm positive the Pats could get him for less (but not some ridic-
ulous amount) because he was here when the team stink stank stunk and
he wants to be here now that there's been a real turnaround and real
possibilities of going all the way, he's said that much too. To me,
Tim Goad is exhibit 'A' of why players should get what they can while
they can because when owners have no use for you, they have no use for
you and it doesn't matter how much blood, sweat and tears you've given
them. We saw that with Carlton Fisk, we saw that with Reggie Robie when
the Dolphins cut him while he was in bankruptcy proceedings and we're
seeing it with Tim Goad. When guys like Bob Kraft say they're in this
business to help the community, you'd have to be five cans short of a
six pack to believe him completely.
|
56.1794 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Apr 07 1995 12:03 | 17 |
|
According to this morning's papers, Tim Goad is a goner.
The general consensus is that Goad was too light in the
butt for Parcells' liking. That combined with Goad coming
off of an injury and the fact that Goad's backup signed for
6.4 mil over four years with the Giants made Tim expendable
and expensive. Watching Goad for seven years here I always
thought he was a bright spot and not a detriment and that
the lack of upfield pressure from either defensive end pos-
ition was the biggest problem with the d-line. Three other
playoff teams (Chiefs, Vikes and Browns) think enough of
Goad to either have given him an offer or bring him in for a
look. Cleveland has offered 1 mil. But obviously Big Tuna
has forgotten more about football than I'll ever know and
he's determined to build *his* team *his* way so I'll have to
assume that this was best for the Patsies SB hopes. That
doesn't make it any easier to swallow.
|
56.1795 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal Patrol | Fri Apr 07 1995 12:13 | 1 |
| Funny, we have a similar situation in New York with the Giants.....
|
56.1796 | This will come back to haunt him | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Fri Apr 07 1995 13:19 | 12 |
|
I haven't really had a hard time accepting any of the Tuna's moves,
even with the bust of Butts, but this doesn't look good. Why sign
300 lb backups for 1Mill plus and not even offer your starter anything
but, "I'll help you with your packing Tim". Yea, Goad was on the light
side but he still was a team leader in tackles and was in the backfield
more than super rookie McGinist. I hope these backups prove me wrong
but if they were that good (1Mill) they'd have started for their old
team don't you think.
Jerry
|
56.1797 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | End Corporate Welfare Instead! | Fri Apr 07 1995 13:32 | 8 |
|
you guys are too hung up on sacks. Parcells is bring in these jumbo players
to be run stuffers and guys who tie up the offensive linemen allowing Slade
and Willie to be the sackers artists. Willie didn't have a clue early on
but seemed solid to me by the end of the year. Much like Slade did. These
two could terrorize QB's by themselves if they're not doubled teamed...
mike
|
56.1798 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Apr 07 1995 14:49 | 19 |
|
>> you guys are too hung up on sacks. Parcells is bring in these jumbo
>> players to be run stuffers and guys who tie up the offensive linemen
>> allowing Slade and Willie to be the sackers artists. Willie didn't have
>> a clue early on but seemed solid to me by the end of the year. Much like
>> Slade did. These two could terrorize QB's by themselves if they're not
>> doubled teamed...
I have no beef with the defensive linemen Parcells signed, especially
John Hand. It's the signing that he didn't make that bugs me. I'm not
sure who he'll put at nose tackle that'll be an improvement over Goad.
As for Slade and McGinest, Slade shows signs of being a major force and
a guy capable of 10-15 sacks a year - no LT but and AT (Andre Tippett)
perhaps. McGinest, on the other hand, is rougher than grade 3 sandpaper
and was manhandled one on one by every tight end or tackle that lined up
against him. His main attribue right now is that he can keep one guymod-
erately busy. Richmond Webb could hold him off with one arm and Mike Pitts
with the other. Dwayne Sabb is a better backer but wants out.
|
56.1799 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | next year in Jerusalem! | Fri Apr 14 1995 14:33 | 1 |
56.1800 | SNARF | OUTSRC::HEISER | next year in Jerusalem! | Fri Apr 14 1995 14:34 | 1 |
56.1801 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Apr 20 1995 14:16 | 11 |
|
>> Who are the Pats looking to draft?
According to Will "The Fossil" McDonough, the Pats are after a RB
and like James Stewart out of Tennessee and if he's not available
they also like James Stweart out of Miami.
In other news, the Pats have stated that the offense will be just
as wide open this year as last year. No smashmouth offense here,
they plan to take full advantage of Bledose, Coates and Brisby.
|
56.1802 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | the dumbing down of America | Thu Apr 20 1995 14:37 | 2 |
56.1803 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Thu Apr 20 1995 14:49 | 8 |
| > Why Stewart if they have Hampton? I'm not sure of their position, but
> why not another receiver to compliment Bledsoe?
I assume you mean Meggett. Hampton is a Giant.
RE: a receiver - they used their 2nd round pick last year on Kevin Lee of
Alabama, who promptly broke his jaw and was out for the year. If he pans
out, receiver is less of a need...
|
56.1804 | RB or OL in first round | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Thu Apr 20 1995 14:52 | 19 |
| >> Why Stewart if they have Hampton?
Hampton is still with the Giants (though rumored to be on the trading
block). The Patriots did pick up Dave Meggett.
Popular thought is that Megget is a "third down" back and the Patriots
still need a work horse for first and second downs (what Butts was
supposed to be).
>> I'm not sure of their position, but why not another receiver to
>> compliment Bledsoe?
The Patriots do NOT need another rookie wide receiver. They have
Brisby (young), Kevin Lee (missed his rookie year because of injury,
broken jaw I believe) and the new guy from the CFL. They could use
a veteran receiver, but not another youngster to compliment Drew.
Vinny
|
56.1805 | same difference | OUTSRC::HEISER | the dumbing down of America | Thu Apr 20 1995 15:38 | 1 |
56.1806 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Apr 20 1995 16:01 | 4 |
| >> I always get Meggett and Hampton confused.
Understandable. One is 5'7" 190 lbs and the other is 6'2" 220 pounds.
Their own moms can't tell them apart.
|
56.1807 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Apr 20 1995 16:04 | 3 |
| Tommy, stop it...yer killing me!
Mark.
|
56.1808 | exit | CNTROL::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 20 1995 16:40 | 4 |
|
welcome back Tommy, we missed ya..........
hahaha
|
56.1809 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | the dumbing down of America | Thu Apr 20 1995 17:10 | 1 |
56.1810 | Isn't there a rivalry?? | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Fri Apr 21 1995 10:17 | 7 |
| >> Their moms probably watch more Giant games than I do.
But aren't the Giants one of the Arizona Cardinals big division
rivals??? So you see them in town once a year and YOUR team
visits them once a year ... hmmmmm ...
|
56.1811 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | the dumbing down of America | Fri Apr 21 1995 12:45 | 2 |
56.1812 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Apr 25 1995 10:58 | 10 |
|
Did anyone else notice that ESPN had no footage on the Pats #1
pick and none of the panel had any comment? It pretty much came
out of left field. I have a sneaking suspicion that Ty Law has
little chance of making the Pats and that Parcells got his guys
in the later rounds so that he can pay them later round money.
BTW - Jets fans are brain-dead for booing the selection of Kyle Brady.
He and Coates will be trading the starting spot in the Pro Bowl
back and forth for the next 6 years.
|
56.1813 | dump Mitchell | HBAHBA::HAAS | You ate my hiding place. | Tue Apr 25 1995 11:02 | 8 |
| Re: Kyle Brady.
I agree, Tommy.
Johnny Mitchell, while a_obvious talent, is a_equally apparent head case.
The Jets will try to unload him before everyone else realizes this.
TTom
|
56.1814 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Apr 25 1995 12:24 | 6 |
| > BTW - Jets fans are brain-dead for booing the selection of Kyle Brady.
While it wasn't fair to Brady, it was appropriate for the clowns that
run the Jets. They have many needs, and TE isn't one of them. This
pick only makes sense if they move Mitchell. I just don't believe
in the productiveness of the 2-TE set as a primary offensive formation.
|
56.1815 | repeat | HBAHBA::HAAS | You ate my hiding place. | Tue Apr 25 1995 12:36 | 8 |
| I remember when the Jets picked Lungeman (sp?), the linebacker outta
Virginia a couple of years ago. They moaned and groaned then and all he
did was to go on and become a_all-pro.
Also, we must all remember that Kotite is now the coach. His abilities to
field and manage a team have yet to be proven.
TTom
|
56.1816 | just curious... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Apr 25 1995 13:48 | 6 |
| No doubt about it...Kyle Brady appears to be headed for greatness as
tight-end. But don't they have some other more pressing needs??
DL, WR, RB, LB???
Frank Mendez
|
56.1817 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Apr 25 1995 15:00 | 5 |
| >Also, we must all remember that Kotite is now the coach. His abilities to
>field and manage a team have yet to be proven.
Not sure about this. I thought he did a pretty good job in Philly with
what he had.
|
56.1818 | may be | HBAHBA::HAAS | You ate my hiding place. | Tue Apr 25 1995 15:06 | 12 |
| I think Kotite is one of those coaches that does OK when all is going
well and when it doesn't, you caint really count on him to do much about
it. This is basically the opinion I expressed concerngin Bristow with the
Hornets.
I would think that the consensus in Philly is that he is not one of the
better coaches in the NFL, especially Randall Cunningham.
When he came to Philly, they're roster was capable of contending for the
playoffs. Only later did attrition, death and free agency take over.
TTom
|
56.1819 | LT to return? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Youngest one's walking - OH NO! | Wed May 10 1995 09:42 | 12 |
| Guess you Pats fans are all excited today with the prospect that LT may
be coming out of retirement to play for the Big Tuna.
According to the paper, LT was so inspired by the sweat he worked up
training for his Wrestlemania match with Bam Bam Bigelow that he is
considering coming out of retirement. He's going to meet with
Parcells to discuss the possibility of a return to the field.
Guess the restaurant not's doing so well, huh?
UMDan
|
56.1820 | IMHO | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Wed May 10 1995 10:50 | 8 |
| Mike Lynch of Ch. 5 reported this morning that it is only a 30%
chance he will become a Patriot. If LT was 10 years younger and
had more years in him but I don't think the Pats will go for it.
They have 3 fine OLB's Slade, McGinest, and Saab. If LT came
back he would have to make the minimum b/c the Pats are near
the max on the Salary cap. I would like to see LT on the Pats
sideline as a Motivator/LB Coach but not as a player.
|
56.1821 | No LT | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed May 10 1995 14:50 | 4 |
| I'd be more excited if Bam Bam Bigelow was going to sign with the Pats.
They need a few more 300+ pound nose tackles. :^)
Mike
|
56.1822 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Funny Bone | Fri May 26 1995 13:27 | 7 |
| Gee if this SissyPlex deal ever gets finalized Mr Macaroni and
Cheese can rid the stadium of working class stiffs like me Denny and Chap
with one to two thousand dollar personal seat licenses and make the place
safe for the newfaux fans to eat quiche and drink wine coolers while
watching their longtime favorite team play.
/Don
|
56.1823 | bad enough a new helmet.... | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri May 26 1995 14:23 | 8 |
|
I, for one, will be trading in my primo Section 106 season tix
if the Pats move to this joke of a $%^&@! dome.
And don't ask me to sell them to you, 'cause Kraft outlawed
transferring season tickets last year - gotta turn 'em in.
- Sean
|
56.1824 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Sat May 27 1995 16:06 | 8 |
| /Don,
Don't be so hard on yourself, labelling yourself a
"working class stiff".
"Stiff" will suffice.
daryll
|
56.1825 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Wed Jul 19 1995 08:30 | 12 |
| Looks like Mr. Macaroni and Cheese is indeed financially strapped.
This year's tickets are being delivered via UPS (which makes it a real bitch
for those of us who work for a living, you know what I mean if you've ever
had to deal with a UPS delivery). Luckily Chap was home yesterday for the
second attempt at delivery. Another friend wasn't so lucky and was told
yesterday that if he wasn't at the Leominster UPS depot by 7:00 tonight the
package was going back! Considering Mr. White Collar had almost two
hundred dollars of my money since December, you would think he could've
splurged and used Uncle Sam to bring us our season tickets. Hope he's
using the money he saved to sign a real running back.
/Don
|
56.1826 | lost a ring, trusting uncle sammy | CNTROL::CHILDS | Watch out Big Brother's watching! | Wed Jul 19 1995 08:38 | 5 |
|
You mean to say you trust the post office?????????? Unless it's
insured, it's open game............
mike
|
56.1827 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Wed Jul 19 1995 09:06 | 4 |
| Used to come in a registered letter Mike. Course that was in the
fiscally irresponsible days of the Sullivans.
/Don
|
56.1828 | you got off light | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Wed Jul 19 1995 10:56 | 6 |
| Delivered!
Hail, we gotta go pick ours up and the steenkin games are being played at
Clemson, to boot.
TTom
|
56.1829 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:10 | 6 |
| Hey TTom, that's what I would expect from the organization that
brought the "Personal Seat License" scam to sports. Whether there's a
SissyPlex or the Pats move to another New England site, the PSL scam
will be a reality for Pats season ticket holders too. 8^(
/Don
|
56.1830 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:17 | 3 |
| Personal Seat License?
|
56.1831 | 42 million,7 years,11.5 mil siging bonus | CNTROL::CHILDS | Watch out Big Brother's watching! | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:25 | 6 |
|
Yo Slash, how much of Bledsoe's salary are you paying??????????
Not a bad piece of change for Drew. 240K per interception. Puts
him right up there with Elway..........
mike
|
56.1832 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:25 | 4 |
| Go back to the Panthers note 'Saw. I'm pretty sure TTom explained
it in detail.
/Don
|
56.1833 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:28 | 5 |
| Hey Mike, since I had to pick up a friend's ticket who was having
money trouble last winter, I'm paying more of Drew's salary than I
would like.
/Don
|
56.1834 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:39 | 6 |
| > Go back to the Panthers note 'Saw. I'm pretty sure TTom explained
> it in detail.
I remember now.
Jeez, they'll squeeze a buck out of you any way they can....
|
56.1835 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Fri Jul 21 1995 10:04 | 5 |
|
Ty Law signed a 5yr 5.5 million dollar deal.
Ron
|
56.1836 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 21 1995 10:17 | 4 |
56.1837 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 11:01 | 3 |
| > Ty Law signed a 5yr 5.5 million dollar deal.
Yeah, he got what fell out of Bledsoe's pocket...
|
56.1838 | PSL, a way of life | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:02 | 16 |
| Yeah, the PSL, the wave of the future :=(
MtfM really raked me over the coals on that one.
It does my heart good, however, to find that there are other saps in the
world who are willing to pay fees they may never get back for the right
to pay inflated ticket prices to see overpriced, spoilt talent, all in
the hopes that, throug the daze, you can remember what a good time you
had hootin some beers.
I'm thinking about just buying one of those industrial size trash cans,
put it in the den in front of the TVs, have a couple of friends to blow
smoke in my face, while I drink semi-tepid draft beer. 'Bout the same
thing.
TTom
|
56.1839 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:17 | 12 |
|
re. Pats tickets:
2 years ago: Came to post office, but you had to go down to get them,
they would not deliver them.
Lasted year: Came to the mailbox
This year: UPS
Personall, I do not *want* those tickets delivered to my mailbox. Too
risky.
- Sean
|
56.1840 | Thank God for Saps ! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:27 | 9 |
| >It does my heart good, however, to find that there are other saps in the
>world who are willing to pay fees they may never get back for the right
>to pay inflated ticket prices to see overpriced, spoilt talent, all in
>the hopes that, throug the daze, you can remember what a good time you
>had hootin some beers.
Well, if you're a fan of the local team you should thank all those "saps"
'cause their spending removes the blackout so you can see all 16 games
on TV for FREE !
|
56.1841 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:55 | 7 |
|
Er, Joe, I think TTom is saying that he's a season
ticketholder so he's not affected by the blackout.
Besides, PSLs have nothing to do with blackouts.
The seats would have been sold anyways. All a PSL is
is a creative way for owners to fleece the public
yet again.
|
56.1842 | awesome shoes! | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:56 | 1 |
56.1843 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:30 | 10 |
| Well, if you gotta pony up $$$ for a PSL, they oughta put your name right on
the seat.
That way, when someone says, "Is that *your* seat?" you can say "Sure, my name
is on it right here"
Actually down there it'd probably sound like "rat-cheer"
'Saw
|
56.1844 | semi memorial\ | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Fri Jul 21 1995 15:08 | 9 |
| Rat-cheer is it and where rat-cheer is a memorial plaque type thang for
all of us that were duped into going for the PSL scam. You get something
like 28 letters and space for you name so I went for
THOMAS JOHN JOSEPH HAAS
I knew that confirmation name would come in handy some day ;-).
TTom
|
56.1845 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:00 | 6 |
| Oh hell, I'd gone for
Thomas R. E. Lee Haas
People'd be bowing at yer feet....8^)
|
56.1846 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:04 | 4 |
|
How about Yee Haas. They'd think you were a real southerner then.
brews
|
56.1847 | Ol' Haas | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 21 1995 17:00 | 3 |
| Or Cartwright Haas
Oops there I go with that Cart before the Haas again
|
56.1848 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 21 1995 17:40 | 1 |
56.1849 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 10:03 | 7 |
| TTom's not even here (what the hell does the T stand for anyway) and yunz guys
is making fun of him.
I'm telling!
8^)
|
56.1850 | I'm still laughin' at that one! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | RIP Andrea 1/18/85 - 7-21/94 | Tue Jul 25 1995 11:53 | 3 |
| !!!! The Cart before the Haas?!?!?!?!?!?!?
NAZZ
|
56.1851 | 31-7 whoa! | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyolgist | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:21 | 3 |
|
No comments on last nights debacle in Philly. I know it's preseason,
but the Pats looked pretty weak.
|
56.1852 | how bout them Colts | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 12:18 | 8 |
| So based on preseason so far, it should be Indianapolis as a lock to win
the AFC East.
The Pats get blowed out. Miami loses to J'Ville and then pulls a complete
no show the nexted week. Buffalo hasn't showed much and we all know the
Jets are coached by Rick Kotite.
TTom
|
56.1853 | | CAMONE::WAY | Officer on deck! | Fri Aug 18 1995 12:20 | 5 |
| What little I watched was pretty poor.
The looked like they were half a beat out of sync all night.
They actually made Crandall Runningham look good....
|
56.1854 | ho hum, it's preseason | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 18 1995 13:09 | 3 |
56.1855 | cling on | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 13:47 | 3 |
| yes but the Panthers have no records, save thised preseason.
TTom
|
56.1856 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Fri Aug 18 1995 18:00 | 8 |
|
re: OUTSRC::HEISER
>The SB Champs have had losing preseason records the past few years.
Is he on the Cards bandwagon or the Pats - now you see him now you
don't. Heisersville, USA (tm) - the location of the latest sports
championship town, because you know heiser will always be on the
bandwagon.
|
56.1857 | nice ring to that | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 18 1995 18:15 | 1 |
56.1858 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Sat Sep 02 1995 23:29 | 27 |
56.1859 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Sun Sep 03 1995 09:36 | 20 |
56.1860 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Sun Sep 03 1995 20:24 | 3 |
56.1861 | If the Pats suck what do the 'Spots do | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Sep 05 1995 09:32 | 16 |
|
Good thing games aren't played with a video game. Pats won in last
minute 17-14. Great game by both teams. Hurst gets smoked for a 70
yarder on 'Spots first possesion. Pats down 7-3. Get another FG to
make it 7-6 and the 'Spots put up another TD to make it 14-6 at the
half. Hurst had that one played well but just didn't get it done.
2nd half the D becomes a solid wall and Bledsoe puts up 11 points for
the win. Martin, Moore where great as was Coates (surprise there uh)
and Bledsoe throws for 302 yards with 0 ints. Lane did a great job
filling in for Harlow at RT. With the Squeelers loosing Woodson and
O'Donnell looks like we may have had a preview of the AFC championship
game.
Jerry
|
56.1862 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | When will the Tribe Choke? | Tue Sep 05 1995 10:13 | 17 |
|
Great game to watch. The new beef on the Defensive line. Did a
great job at glogging up the middle. Which enabled the LB's to fill
the holes. The Browns running game looks like last years Patriots.
No Speed in the backfield to bump it outside. Hoard is much better
then Butts. Yet it that isn't enough. The up the middle running game isn't
going to cut it. The Browns will miss Metcalf. Yes, they have Rison.
Looks like the Rison/Metcalf trade. Improved Cleveland's passing game,
but hurt the running game a little.
Lets hope Bledsoe can continue what he started on Sunday, No
INT's and 302 yrds. He spread the ball around to 6 different receivers.
He looked good at reading the defense. Then throwing to the open
receiver. He only forced in a couple of passes. Time to bring on the
fish. Who looked good on opening day. Hurst better get his arse in gear
this week. Or Marino to Fryar is going to be heard a lot next week.
Ron
|
56.1863 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Tue Sep 05 1995 10:17 | 12 |
| I watched the early part of the game then had to go to a party.
Kept getting scores fed to us from the young 'uns who were watching the game.
Couldn't believe the final score.
Later, saw some highlights. Couldn't quite tell from the highlights, but
I can speculate that the Browns were guilty of what the Giants were guilty
of in the early Parcell years -- get a lead, try not to lose, lose on the
last drive.
Nice win for the Pats.
|
56.1864 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:05 | 16 |
56.1865 | | WMOIS::MAZURKA | Son_of_A_Wicked_Good_Time | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:42 | 5 |
| Well,I'm Glad that Micheal(Hee_Hee)Had his Big_Game and got it over
with.... Big Win fer The_Pats.
Crazy_Revenge_Tastes_Sweet_Al
|
56.1866 | cleveland....just plain stinks. | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | N.E. Patriots...Bound for glory. | Thu Sep 07 1995 01:45 | 13 |
| Well I've made it to two Pats games in '96, ( no-preseason ).
This win against the browns was especially sweet, helps ease the pain
from driving 8.5 hours to cleveland for new years. Best sight of the
day was a plane overhead with a banner reading...."What's brown and
stinks?....cleveland!". 8 tickets arrived at my buddies door saturday
for the Patriots-falcons game. This should prove to be one hell of
a road trip, can't wait.
Patriots 27
marino 21
Lil Ed
|
56.1867 | San Fran game | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:57 | 1 |
56.1868 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Sep 07 1995 13:06 | 1 |
| nope
|
56.1869 | ex | ZEKE::CAMILLERI | | Fri Sep 08 1995 14:17 | 7 |
|
Does anyone know if the New_england_patriots notes file moved from
there old location RMVMS::New_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS?
Thanks, Mark
|
56.1870 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Gehring <===> Ripken | Mon Sep 11 1995 11:28 | 7 |
|
The Patriots notesfile is still on RMVMS::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.
The owner of the system moved from HLO to LJO. He is waiting for a
new node name address. Once he has a new ENET address it will be
posted.
Ron
|
56.1871 | Frustration ....... | AKOCOA::DFARRELL | Dennis Farrell -- AKO2-3/F1 | Mon Sep 11 1995 12:42 | 67 |
| Since the Pats notesfile is down, I guess I'll have to do my whining in
here. I am a season ticket holder who was at yesterday's excuse for
a competitive game and have the following things to say:
- The Pats shot themselves in the foot by not capitalizing on the
opportunities they had from turnovers (Reynolds INT, Parmelee
fumble, etc.).
- The Miami defense stuffed the Pats ground game. I hope all the
idiots who thought the Pats had a legitimate ground game based on
one good performance by Curtis Martin vs. the Browns have now come
back down to earth. I think Curtis Martin is going to be a great
NFL back but he needs more help up front and when you play against
a good run defense, you ain't goin' nowhere !!
- The Pats did not necessarily lose the game as a result of some bad
(certainly very questionable) calls by the zebras, but you have to
wonder what the outcome of the game might have been if they got a
couple of breaks on the calls. For example, the complexion of the
game and the sequence of play calling would have been very different
if the TD pass to Will Moore (yes -- it was a catch -- it happened
right in front of me and the reply verified it) counted and the
score would have been 17-10. Other questionable calls that just
ruined the Pats momentum:
1. First Miami drive --- Pats stop Fins on 3rd down forcing a punt
but wait -- there's a flag. Ferric Collons called for an illegal
hand in the face -- Dolphins get a 2nd chance and drive for a FG.
Right away, zebras give us a preview of things they can do with
their yellow hankies !!
2. Two defensive holding penalties on Pats DBs keep Miami drives
alive ! More over-officiating !!
3. Pass interference call against Hurst for "bumping" Fryar (or
was it Parmelee ?). Puleeassee --- both men have the same right
to the ball !
4. Reynolds interception and score nullified because the zebras
said Fryar tackled him. Sorry --- Reynolds bounced off Fryar
after the INT and should have been allowed to get up an run.
5. Aforementioned catch by Will Moore for a TD was nullified.
The guy who nullified it was the Umpire about 30 yards away
who did not even have a good angle on the catch.
6. TD pass to Coates nullified by offensive pass interference. I
saw the replay on this one and would have to say, as they say
in basketball, this one should have been a "non-call". Coates
and Cox bumped into each other, I don't think either one initiated
the contact.
But hey, who am I to whine ?? I only paid $640 for 2 season tickets to
see a bunch of old, out of shape guys attempt to control a game that
they clearly can't keep up with. As I said on my opening remark, the
Pats were still in the game (despite the refs) in the 4th quarter and
failed to punch the ball in.
You just gotta wonder what the final score would have been if the game
had been called correctly (IMHO). You also gotta wonder if all those
things many people have said over the years about Shula's presence on
the NFL Rules Committee influencing the refs is true too ?? I would
hope not --- but you can't convince me otherwise after watching that
farce yesterday !!
DF
|
56.1872 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Sep 11 1995 13:30 | 4 |
56.1873 | | STAR::ALLISON | | Mon Sep 11 1995 13:59 | 12 |
| Is anyone else tired of seeing Vincent "I Want it in the
Clutch" Brisby drop the easy ones.. Granted, trying to catch a
bullet from Bledsoe behind you is not always easy, but he did
seem to drop more than his share yesterday...
Good to see Moore picking up the slack. I can him becoming
the #1 target soon if he isn't already...
I have to wonder about instant reply -- would that have made a difference
in the game? Maybe all the Pats needed was a passing TD in the
Dead Zone to break out of the slump...
|
56.1874 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 11 1995 15:00 | 13 |
|
Anyone, who thinks the Pats lost because of the refereeing, wasn't
paying attention. The Pats flat out got whupped by the best team in
the AFC. And Miami's miscues was the only thing keeping it from being
even more embarassing. Their o-line pushed Big Tuna's bigger-isn't-
always-better d-line around like they were blocking sleds. Early on
it looked like Miami might chalk up 300 yards rushing. Marino is
Marino despite the miscues and he managed to consistently get rid of
the ball just before the Pats could get to him. Their defense shut
down Coates, Martin and Meggett and disrupted Bledsoe enough to remind
us that Drew is still a kid and not hardly in Marino's class *yet*.
A tough loss to take but I think after the first game some of us ob-
viously needed a reality smack.
|
56.1875 | | STAR::ALLISON | | Mon Sep 11 1995 15:18 | 9 |
| Sorry I have to disagree... If you don't think the zebras disrupted
the flow of the game, you are mistaken. 17 penalties were called. Take back
any of the following -- Pats stopped Fins on third down, Johnson
gets called for something, first down. Moores catch down low. Big Ben
in the endzone.. Sometimes all a team needs is a little lift to get
going. Nothing deflates the sails more than a few calls like these.
Yeah, maybe the Fin's o-line shoved them around but the Pats were still in
the game until late. 1 call could have made the difference.
|
56.1876 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Mon Sep 11 1995 15:35 | 20 |
56.1877 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 11 1995 16:12 | 13 |
|
>> 17 penalties were called. Take back any of the following...
Ten of the penalties were on Miami including a holding call
on big Eric Green's 55 yard reception. You know the one where
he used Maurice Hurst as a doormat. And then there was the bone-
headed 'failure to report' penalty. Give credit where it's due.
Miami had 4 turnovers and 10 penalties and they still smoked
the Pats. Miami did more to keep the Pats in it than the Pats
did themselves. The scariest part may be is that they stll haven't
played their best.
|
56.1878 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 11 1995 16:23 | 12 |
| Could be worse. Any team that has to start out playing Cleveland, Miami, S.F.
could easily end up with an 0-3 record. But the Pats already have one. To bad
they couldn't get another before facing the 49'ers.
All things considered, even if they are 1-2 that won't be too bad since they
have all those games against the Colts, Jets, and the aging Bills. And the
rest of the NFC West shouldn't be that difficult to beat.
After next week the other Miami game and the other AFC teams should be about
all they have to worry about Who are the other 3 AFC teams they play this year?
George
|
56.1879 | hope they come out of their coma for S.F! | ASIC::CHARRON | time for a change | Mon Sep 11 1995 16:27 | 23 |
| re: .1876
I pictured this pimple-faced little kid, with snot dripping from his
nose, taunting the other kids from behind his mama's apron when I read
your note.... ;)
anyhow, the Patriots notes conference is down, so this looks like the
place to be.
The ref's didn't beat the Pats yeasterday. The Pats beat themselves. No
offense, and little defense will do that to you.... Although, in
defense of the defense, they did present the offense with a couple of
opportunities....
The third down call in the first half was an illegal use of the hands
call which replay showed..... and Coates did push off on that score
that was called back. It was obvious. The Moore catch could have gone
either way.
Bottom line is they were beat by a better offense, and a better defense.
/brian (a Pats fan)
|
56.1880 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Sep 11 1995 16:30 | 11 |
56.1881 | Terrible calls by ref cost Pats 21 pts, but NE still sipped | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | NBA action - it's nonexistant | Mon Sep 11 1995 16:58 | 27 |
| Pats defensive line and inside LBs (you too Vincent Brown) had the snot
kicked out of them by the Fins. The pats didn't deserve to win this
game just based on control of the line of scrimmage.
But given that, the zebras stole THREE touchdowns away from the Pats.
It tough to lose one touchdown in a game, never mind three. Here's
hoping that the zebras have now missed their quota of NE touchdowns
for the season.
1) Reynolds was obviously not down by contact after the interception.
Ref simply blew his whistle too soon. Reynolds touched Fryar from the
back, but he most certainly wasn't "Down by contact". Fryar never
touched him - Reynolds bumpoed into Fryar after the interception, but
not while he was on the ground.
2) Moore caught the ball. Simple as that. The ref 30 yards away who
oeverruled the closer ref who said it was a catch did not have a better
angle. If all the zebras got together to rule the Miami catch legit
earlier in the game (and it was), why didn' tthey huddle on Moore's TD?
3) Coates did NOT push off on Cox on his TD. Not even close. There
was some contact, but Coates never used his hands, Cox never budged,
and if you were going to call a penalty on that play, it could have
been for illegal contact more than 5 yards downfield on Cox. The right
call was no call at all.
NAZZ
|
56.1882 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Gehring <===> Ripken | Mon Sep 11 1995 18:14 | 10 |
|
Anybody who thinks the Patriots are a better football team then
Miami. Needs to have there eyes examined. Miami improved there football
team. In every area that was weak last year. They added Eric Green at
TE. On defense they got a DB (Green Bay), Bryce Paup LB, Steve Emtman
at DL. I believe there were 1 or 2 other signings. Without any
signifant loses to Free Agency. I see them weak at Running Back if
Parmelee goes down.
Ron
|
56.1883 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 12 1995 10:44 | 6 |
|
Bryce Paup plays for the Bills. I think they got Buckley from the
Packers. I think Pittsburg may have something to say to Miami about
who the best team in the AFC is this coming monday........
mike
|
56.1884 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 12 1995 10:54 | 9 |
|
>> I think Pittsburg may have something to say to Miami about
>> who the best team in the AFC is this coming monday........
I seriously doubt it with Tomczak at QB and no Rod Woodson
in the secondary. If Miami can clean up the penalties and
turnovers, this could be a real blowout because for my money
Miami is far and away the class of the AFC. And Pittsburg
doesn't have the offense to hang with them.
|
56.1885 | Beating the Pats ain't that big a deal | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 12 1995 10:57 | 5 |
|
but they do have the defense to stop Miami. Miami may indeed win but
I seriously doubt they'll blow them out........
mike
|
56.1886 | A blow out for sure!!!!! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Tue Sep 12 1995 13:09 | 8 |
| Re:-1885
Oh, man are you wrong on this one Mikey. Marino's gonna torch em' for
3-5 TD's. This one's a BLOWOUT!
JS
|
56.1887 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Eight and counting... | Tue Sep 12 1995 13:14 | 6 |
|
The Patriots notesfile is back on-line. Here is the new address.
MODIFY ENTRY NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS /FILE=RDVAX::NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS
Ron
|
56.1888 | Clever .... | AKOCOA::DFARRELL | Dennis Farrell -- AKO2-3/F1 | Tue Sep 12 1995 13:22 | 15 |
| re: .1876
Groaner,
Touche !! Nice plagiarism of my note to you (re: Indians early exit
from AL playoffs). I wonder how many other folks in here got it ?
Oh well, did you write this because you're still upset about the Pats
beating the Brownies last week ?
Remember, you will be eating crow before me. The Tribe will be out of
the playoffs in October, the Pats may be home watching the NFL on Fox
by early January.
DF
|
56.1889 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Tue Sep 12 1995 14:17 | 3 |
56.1890 | They're toast.... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Sep 13 1995 13:36 | 9 |
| > The Indians will trounce the Red Sox in the playoffs, bank on it.
> Indians - Yankees ALCS 1995.
Probably, but it will be in the ALCS.
Sox slide to the wild card, and play the Western Division champs in the first
round. Yankees/Indians play in the first round.
zamboni Sox Sip
|
56.1891 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Mon Sep 18 1995 10:31 | 7 |
56.1892 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 18 1995 11:19 | 10 |
|
Still more eveidence that Drew Bledsoe won't be the
keynote speaker at any MENSA meetings real soon...
On three different occasions a 49er defensive linemen
jumped offsides on third down giving the Pats a free
play. On all three occasions not only did Bledsoe not
take a chance and go deep, he didn't even throw long
enough to get the first down if the call was missed.
|
56.1893 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 18 1995 11:44 | 26 |
| >
> On three different occasions a 49er defensive linemen
> jumped offsides on third down giving the Pats a free
> play. On all three occasions not only did Bledsoe not
> take a chance and go deep, he didn't even throw long
> enough to get the first down if the call was missed.
I don't know if you got to see the entire game up in your area. Down here we
were treated to seeing the Umpire pick Brown and Hasty run back a 62 yrd
inty for a TD.
Did these things happen after Drew got bounced off his shoulder? If so
maybe I'd cut him a little slack. If not, then I'll make sure that the Mensa
folks don't send him an application. 8^)
btw, re the shoulder, the "medical folks" sounded awfully smug that it wasn't
anything serious. Watching the way he got bounced and the pain level, I kept
thinking it might have been a shoulder separation. Has there been any
official word on the injury?
'Saw
|
56.1894 | ex | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:56 | 19 |
|
>> I don't know if you got to see the entire game up in your area.
Yes, I saw the whole entire game. The defense deserved a better fate
than that. The first half was absolutely masterful and they gave the
offense excellent field position which of course they did not capitalize
on.
>> Did these things happen after Drew got bounced off his shoulder? If so
>> maybe I'd cut him a little slack.
No excuses. It happened before, during and after. He continues to make
bone-headed decisions and mistakes. The three missed opportunities
were one thing. Then it seemed like every sack could have been avoided.
He locked on to receivers twice and got blindsided. And then he held
on to the ball too long twice and got taken down. Ken Norton alluded
that Bledose had Jim Everett type happy feet. To me he looked a little
too much like Tony Eason.
|
56.1895 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 18 1995 14:37 | 28 |
| | The first half was absolutely masterful and they gave the
| offense excellent field position which of course they did not capitalize
| on.
I'd have to agree on this....
> No excuses. It happened before, during and after. He continues to make
> bone-headed decisions and mistakes. The three missed opportunities
> were one thing. Then it seemed like every sack could have been avoided.
> He locked on to receivers twice and got blindsided. And then he held
> on to the ball too long twice and got taken down. Ken Norton alluded
> that Bledose had Jim Everett type happy feet. To me he looked a little
> too much like Tony Eason.
Okay. I didn't catch this actually -- wasn't paying that much attention.
I was just noticing that they weren't moving the ball.
If I were Tuna, I might have stayed with Zolak -- at least he seemed to
befuddle the Niner defense for a while.... It might have been worth staying
with to see if they could capitalize on it....
'Saw
|
56.1896 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 18 1995 14:59 | 15 |
| Ok so maybe Bledose had a bad game but look who they were playing. Most
likely if any of us had been crushed by Ken Norton Jr. we'd do some fuzzy
thinking for the next hour or so as well. After all, this was the team that
ground the Cowboys into pulp just 6 months ago.
All and all they are not that bad off, they got through Cleveland, Miami,
S.F. and came up 1-2. Could have been better but most teams would have been 0-3
right now wondering what it took to win a game. And losing to the 49'ers 28-3
really isn't that bad, other teams will give them quite a bit more.
The tough part of the schedule is over and the Pats have a week off before
they start the easy part.
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.1897 | Bledsoe not the only one with mental deficiencies | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:20 | 9 |
|
While the Pats' D played well in the first half, just like last year,
they are going to have to correct some of these horrendous mental
breakdowns that allow a few very easy plays to negate the overall
effort. They were able to successfully correct those secondary
problems late last season...
glenn
|
56.1898 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:36 | 3 |
56.1899 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:52 | 22 |
|
>> Ok so maybe Bledose had a bad game but look who they were playing.
>> Most likely if any of us had been crushed by Ken Norton Jr. we'd
>> do some fuzzy thinking for the next hour or so as well.
His thinking has been fuzzy all season to the tune of zero
TD passes this season. The team's performance in the red zone
has been downright horrendous. The hit is a nice excuse but
that's all it is. And btw that hit by Norton didn't look nearly
bad enough to warrant the reaction by Bledsoe. Drew has a lot of
good qualities but it looks like toughness ain't one of them.
He looked like he really wanted to come out of the game for
good at that point.
>> The tough part of the schedule is over and the Pats have a week
>> off before they start the easy part.
In the next four games they have Atlanta (should be a win) but
then come Denver, KC and Buffalo. If their offense is still this
pathetic then it won't be so 'easy'.
|
56.1900 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:56 | 15 |
|
>> While the Pats' D played well in the first half, just like last year,
>> they are going to have to correct some of these horrendous mental
>> breakdowns that allow a few very easy plays to negate the overall
>> effort. They were able to successfully correct those secondary
>> problems late last season...
14 of the 28 points can be directly attributed to Bledsoe turnovers.
But your point is well taken. Maurice Hurst was repeatedly beaten
badly. And the third and 5 from the SF five when they hit Singleton
on the slant for about 15 yards was a crusher. That's their bread
and butter play and you have to know that. The secondary started out
this way last year and straightened out. Still, 3 points against
Miami and 3 against SF. Impossible to win that way.
|
56.1901 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Two and counting... | Mon Sep 18 1995 16:24 | 9 |
|
In defense of Bledsoe a little bit. After the Norton hit. Drew
could not move his elbow higher then his shoulder. Its one of those
you can't do anymore harm injuries. If you can deal with the pain
you can play. Drew tried to play and the bad shoulder was effecting
his play. Thus, the coaches should have taken him out. Is a 75% Drew
Bledsoe better then a 100% Scott Zolak?
Ron
|
56.1902 | I'd rather have Beasley | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Sep 18 1995 16:40 | 23 |
|
I watched the first and fourth quarters on the idiot box and the
middle two on the radio (tank is an absolute as$ by the way) and all
I have to say is the D played extremely well. I don't buy the fuzzy
thoughts deal. Bledsoe HAS to learn to look receivers off or he is
going to get killed. Harlow will be back against the chuck and duck
Falcons so the protection should get a little better. Overall I saw
some things in the D that where positve nothing positive can be said
about the O as far as I'm concerned. Now I wanted to get in here
yesterday and rant and rave but I wanted to cool down a little but
after 24 hours I still feel the same.......Is it me or does that
calorically challenged non hair havin pant load McGuire have something
against the Pats. I know the announcers have to be unbiased but this
guy is blatent in his hatred for the Pats. If my memory is right this
piece of trash had played or had something to do with the Bills at one
point. What did John Hannah or Russ Francis run him over one to many
times? I can't take that jerk one more game. I really have a deep
dislike for this clown and if I where to see him say at the Dedham
Hilton, where they stayed for opening day, I may have to talk to this
piece of crap.
Jerry
|
56.1903 | news!?! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 16:47 | 7 |
| > I watched the first and fourth quarters on the idiot box and the
> middle two on the radio ...
You watched the 2nd and 3rd quarters on radio? ;-).
TTom
|
56.1904 | my bad | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Sep 18 1995 17:01 | 4 |
|
don't you all have the dish on the roof?
|
56.1905 | usually it's in front of the trailer ;^] | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 17:15 | 0 |
56.1906 | Since I probably won't be able to ask OJ | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Sep 18 1995 17:51 | 4 |
| I may be able to find out that question since I know Paul Seymour of
those 70s Bills and my bil knows him real well. He didn't have any
comment about bills-pats except great respect for Grogan of course but
I'll try to pry it out of him.
|
56.1907 | How some of these guys keep their jobs is a mystery... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 18 1995 18:00 | 13 |
|
Paul McGuire was definitely Buffalo Bills but I think he was long gone
by the 1970s and especially the era of Hannah/Francis (did Russ Francis
ever pancake _anyone_?).
McGuire did seem particularly full of himself yesterday with those
references to his terrific eyesight. Didn't he also get into some
kind of on-air pissing contest with OJ a couple years back, where
they had to do the Dan Rather curtain-drop thing on him before he
set himself ablaze? Add him to the list of suspects...
glenn
|
56.1908 | those where some major tussles | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Sep 19 1995 08:16 | 9 |
|
Well maybe not to the extreme but I'm not the only one that thinks
McGuire is a dope. As far as Francis ever pancake anyone ask Phil
Villipiano (sp).
Jerry
|
56.1909 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Sep 19 1995 10:03 | 7 |
| All the guys on Imus said that McGuire has a drinking problem.
Now, it's probably not true (more than likely, anyway) but if you listened
to him with that in mind, it almost sounded credible....
'Saw
|
56.1910 | Like F. Lee Bailey-- shut up and have another martini, F | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 19 1995 10:06 | 8 |
|
> Now, it's probably not true (more than likely, anyway) but if you listened
> to him with that in mind, it almost sounded credible....
He may not, but he's one of those guys who looks like he does...
glenn
|
56.1911 | My poor attempt at the Cardinal.... | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Sep 19 1995 10:26 | 19 |
| > He may not, but he's one of those guys who looks like he does...
Sure 'n his name be McGuire now too. Makes a body wonder if he's been
blowin' the foam off bedpans too.
Which doesn't belong and why, Glenn in the morn'?
a) Paul McGuire
b) OJ Simpson
c) Mike Leary
Sure'n the answer's c - Mike Leary. Why? Because Mike Leary doesn't wear
extra large Isotoner gloves when he's harvestin' potatoes....
Now for the daily lotto numbers.....
|
56.1912 | Atlanta could make or beak Pats' season | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | I'll make a good Gordon, Gordon | Tue Sep 19 1995 12:04 | 9 |
| I wouldn't say Atlanta is a definite win for the Pats. I will say that
it's a game that could determine the rest of their season, since they
have Denver and Kansas City after Atlanta, and I'd expect no better
than a split of those two game. In Atlanta, the Falcons will be tough,
especially given the kind of offense they play. A loss to Atlanta
would mean 1-3 going into Denver and KC, and only another seven game
win streak would get them into the playoffs.
NAZZ
|
56.1913 | In McNamara's band | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Sep 19 1995 12:56 | 9 |
|
Yea I know McGuire is a booze hound. A friend of mine was at a
reception the Sat. before opening day and McGuire came up to his
friend and asked if his pants where 42's or something. My buddy
said the dude was stewed to the gills.
Jerry
|
56.1914 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:01 | 10 |
|
McGuire had a bypass or some heart procedure not too long ago.
He was told he had to give up a few things. He said he'd give
up anything but Budweiser. The guy who really annoyed me during
a Pats telecast was Collinsworth during the Miami game. He made
it sound like NE didn't even belong on the same field as Miami
when the truth was that as bad as the Pats played they were still
in it right up to the middle of the fourth. Cris seems to go out
of his way to say something bold just to set himself apart from
the pack and too often he just comes off as asinine and abrasive.
|
56.1915 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:33 | 5 |
| Overall I've noticed these tendencies with color commentators (excepting
perhaps John Madden) to pander to the team that's ahead and trash the team
that's behind.
Maybe it's just me, I dunno....
|
56.1916 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:03 | 9 |
|
Paul Maguire imo is one of the best. He calls it like he see it, he
apologizes when he makes a mistakes and he lets the other's make fun of him.
What more can a guy do? To listen to Enberg and some of these other
louts you'd think they never made a mistake in their life. It was
a sorry day when they broke up Albert and Maguire cause they were
right up ther with Summerall and Madden for overall entertainment.
mike
|
56.1917 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:41 | 4 |
|
Mike Childs, you were right about Pittesburg having a say as
to who the best team in the AFC is. Last night they said, "It
ain't us."
|
56.1918 | Not that this was the only problem... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:48 | 11 |
|
> Mike Childs, you were right about Pittesburg having a say as
> to who the best team in the AFC is. Last night they said, "It
> ain't us."
No kidding. And once again Mike Tomczak proved that his hands
are too small to handle the regulation NFL football, and he has
no business as a starting QB in this league...
glenn
|
56.1919 | Hootie > Tomczak | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:50 | 7 |
| Y'all missed it.
The Fish won cause Hootie and the Blowfish sang the National Anthem and
Dan Marino, along with a cast of many including Zo, are in one of their
videos.
TTom
|
56.1920 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:06 | 9 |
|
They're just settin' Miami up for the end of the year. Besides Miami
usually starts the year off hot and sucks pondwater when it counts.
I'm just glad you torment on an equal basis Tommy, otherwise I'd
take it personally! Afterall I'm still deeply disturb and seeing
a shrink over the Donny Osmond expose!!!!!111
;^)
|
56.1921 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:31 | 4 |
| I think after the injuries on Opening Day, Pittsburgh gave up claim to
being the main competition for the Dolphins. At least for now....
That's the way I look at it....
|
56.1922 | not so fast, yet | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:38 | 13 |
| I wouldn't count the Steelhaids out, at least not now.
They're sitting pretty comfortable at 2-1. That puts 'em behind only KC
and the Fish.
They lost with their scrub QB so better days may be ahead. Compared to
some other pretenders like Cleveland, they've looked better against
common opponents such as Houston which Pittsburgh whooped and the might
Browns barely beat.
They're all just playing for the right to lose in the SuperBowl anyway.
TTom
|
56.1923 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:35 | 7 |
|
The Steelers had the same problem the Pats had the last two
weeks. A solid defense, in Pittsburg's case perhaps a great
one, and no offense. Ya just can't win that way. I'd like
to see if that Miller kid pans out for the Steelers though.
Because Pittsburg with even an average offense is a solid
match for Miami.
|
56.1924 | Drew Bledsoe == Tony Eason ??? | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Sep 28 1995 17:17 | 13 |
|
There's a piece in ESPN-net by Chris Mortesen about Drew Blesoe's
courage or lack thereof. According to Mortensen, Big Tuna was none
too thrilled about the way Bledsoe reacted to the hit. Where Tuna
wanted Bledsoe to suck it up and show some grit and leadership in-
stead Drew cradled his arm on the sidelines and shied away from the
pass rush on the field. Also supposedly some of th 49ers asked their
defensive coordinator, Pete Carroll, to call off the dogs and not
blitz and potentially hurt Bledsoe. Something they wouldn't have
done if they didn't see fear in Drew's eyes. Word is that because
of the way Bledsoe and his agent have handled this whole incident,
Drew will not start until Parcells is convinced he's "100% healthy".
|
56.1925 | Maybe he was griamcing because the shoulder was truly busted? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 28 1995 17:22 | 12 |
|
> -< Drew Bledsoe == Tony Eason ??? >-
I heard this criticism right away, but then yesterday I read that
Bledsoe has a third-degree separation, the worst possible. What's
the real story here? If Bledsoe indeed has that serious a separation,
then the real stupidity truly was with Parcells for leaving him in
there late in the game for no other reason than to prove a point in
a lost cause...
glenn
|
56.1926 | Parcells really needs to actually DO something | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Sep 28 1995 18:48 | 8 |
| Parcells blew it big time and knows it by now. Bill Parcells hasn't
done anything or proven anything since he's been here. I still have
hope that he knows what he's been doing, I also have doubt. The fact
is he squeaked into the playoffs (factual accomplishment - very lucky
of course since it needed 6 or 7 in a row).
I also see a lot of his key players as holdovers (eg the
line,Hurst,Brown) and his replacements hardly an improvement.
|
56.1927 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Sep 28 1995 19:01 | 23 |
|
>> -< Maybe he was griamcing because the shoulder was truly busted? >-
That would certainly explain why Parcells, who is usually pretty
heavy handed with the press, backed down from Channel 5's Ed Harding
when Harding pressed him on leaving Bledsoe in and offered to show
him video tape of Drew grimacing on the sidelines. When I saw that
I thought that either Big Tuna screwed up bad or Bledsoe punked
out.
>> I heard this criticism right away, but then yesterday I read that
>> Bledsoe has a third-degree separation, the worst possible. What's
>> the real story here?
It's some doctor that his agent referred Drew to that said that
Drew had a 3rd degree separation. The Pats really haven't said
anything about it. BTW - the way Drew's agent Steinberg handled
this can't sit to well with BT. To say that he feels it best that
Drew rest his shoulder, etc. etc. I'd think BT would like more
input on that.
|
56.1928 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Sep 29 1995 09:31 | 15 |
| All shoulder separations are painful. They were pretty common stock of all the
serious injuries sustained on our rugby club. A couple of guys I know had what
they've termed a 3rd degree separation. Even "strapped in" they said it was
painful, and that it was a bitch to try and sleep even.
I saw Drew's hit and thought shoulder separation right away. I don't know how
bad it was, but clearly he was in pain.
I'm surprised that they wanted him back in there, considering he's their future
and all of that.
I think Parcells blew this one -- unless he had absolutely no faith in Zolak.
'Saw
|
56.1929 | Drew got second opinion | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Fri Sep 29 1995 09:59 | 19 |
|
What you have here is the tale of too tails. When the game was
in progress. Drew was examined by the Patriots doctor. At that point
in time, it was deemed a minor shoulder seperation. Which would
translate into a 1st degree seperation.
Once the game was over and Drew was re-examined by the Patriots
doctor. They discovered that indeed it was worse then first thought.
The problem I have with the Patriots. Is that they did not take an
x-ray of Drew's shoulder. During half time of the 49'ers game. They
waited and took the x-ray the next day. The x-ray told them how bad
the shoulder was. If they took the x-ray at the game. They would have
know and pulled Drew from the game.
Drew's agent got involved for this reason. They didn't take an
x-ray right away. Then you had the same doctor (Patriots) tell you
something different, after the x-ray. Thus, Drew flew to Alabama to
see the specialist. To have him look at the x-rays. Drew just got a
second opinion. Which is just being smart.
Ron
|
56.1930 | seen it | HBAHBA::HAAS | arpecay iemday | Fri Sep 29 1995 10:48 | 8 |
| >All shoulder separations are painful.
Lasted night in the Md-Ga Tech game, a player separated his shoulder and
the "reset" it on the field.
I'm sure Drew can get a clip of it from ESPN.
TTom
|
56.1931 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Sep 29 1995 10:52 | 13 |
| >>All shoulder separations are painful.
>
>Lasted night in the Md-Ga Tech game, a player separated his shoulder and
>the "reset" it on the field.
>
>I'm sure Drew can get a clip of it from ESPN.
Was it a separation or a dislocation? Dislocations can be reset.
Separations are basically things that have to "heal" back.... it's a different
set of bones and ligaments and stuff....
'Saw
|
56.1932 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Sep 29 1995 11:03 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 56.1926 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> Parcells blew it big time and knows it by now. Bill Parcells hasn't
> done anything or proven anything since he's been here. I still have
> hope that he knows what he's been doing, I also have doubt. The fact
> is he squeaked into the playoffs (factual accomplishment - very lucky
> of course since it needed 6 or 7 in a row).
I disagree with this. When Parcells took over the Patriots they were a club
in shambles able to only win a handful of games per year. In just a couple
seasons he got them to the playoffs.
Even if he did make a mistake that doesn't mean all that much and in this
case he seems to have been acting on bad information from the team doctor.
I feel good about Parcells. The Patriots should always be a contender or
moving toward being a contender if he's around.
George
|
56.1933 | that's gotta hurt! | HBAHBA::HAAS | arpecay iemday | Fri Sep 29 1995 12:16 | 8 |
| They called it a separation.
The thing that comes to mind is Lethal Weapon II where Mel Gibson had
this thing his character could do to dislocate/separate his shoulder so
he could get outta straight jackets. He would grimace fairly
significantly when he did this.
TTom
|
56.1934 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Sep 29 1995 12:53 | 28 |
| It's been a while, and I could be a bit mixed up, and I don't have my
Gray's here with me, but it sounds as if some sportscaster was mis-using a
word (such as they always do with the term scrum)
A dislocation is where the ball end of the humerus (the upper bone in the arm)
actually comes out of the socket joint that is the shoulder. This is extremely
painful, and under some circumstances can be "reduced" on the spot. However,
as an EMT we were told to just transport and let an ortho guy take care of
that.
Multiple dislocations over time will weaken the shoulder joint, and make
dislocation easier (although no less painful I'm sure). Harry Houdini was able
to do some of his escapes from straight jackets by dislocating his shoulder and
creating enough slack in the jacket. This was alluded to, if I remember
correctly, in Lethal Weapon.
Separation, I believe, is an actual separation of some of the other bones that
make up the socket area of the shoulder joint (basically the clavicle and
something else). The ends of these bones are not fused, but held together
with ligaments (I think -- I'd have to check to be sure) and a good "pop"
on the shoulder like Drew took (or Aikman last year or two seasons ago it was)
will slightly separate those bones.
I might be a bit off, but that's the general nature of the problem as I
understand it....
|
56.1935 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Sep 29 1995 13:16 | 1 |
56.1936 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Sep 29 1995 13:17 | 3 |
| No, the other side.
George
|
56.1937 | still hurts | HBAHBA::HAAS | arpecay iemday | Fri Sep 29 1995 13:32 | 6 |
| Which prevents the ol' followthrough.
Also, from the sounds of it, he may be "favoring" it a bit which means
he'll be tossing sooner and shorter.
TTom
|
56.1938 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Fri Sep 29 1995 13:47 | 12 |
|
The bad part is that it all could have been avoided
if Drew had either the good sense to get rid of the ball
fast or the agility to sidestep Norton. Norton came right
up the middle, Bledsoe had to have seen him coming but
Drew did nothing to avoid taking the sack. The vast majority
of Bledsoe's sacks have been avoidable. He locks on to receivers
and never sees the hit coming from the blindside. The ab-
ility to 'feel' the rush seems to be innate and as Drew doesn't
have it, he may be prone to getting the stuffing whacked out of
him for the rest of his career.
|
56.1939 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Sep 29 1995 16:54 | 6 |
| Bledsoe does seem to get more hits that he should have
been able to avoid. The up side of this is that he
doesn't have "happy feet". (At least not yet)
billl
|
56.1940 | ROCK THE HOUSE | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Sep 29 1995 17:38 | 7 |
|
Bledsoe is washed up! There is no way he will make it in this
league for another 2 years. He better start polishing those
pumps!
WOOF!
|
56.1941 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Sep 29 1995 17:53 | 6 |
| Washed up?
That makes no sense. He's had success in the past, what makes you think he
can't play when he comes back from his injury?
George
|
56.1942 | ROCK THE HOUSE... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Sep 29 1995 19:44 | 5 |
|
He'd have worn a dress for too long!
WOOF!
|
56.1943 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Sep 29 1995 21:45 | 6 |
|
Well, I'll take the heat for this - I'm psyched for Zolak. I hope he
tears 'em up out there in Atlanta. Always enjoy the meat and 'taters
qb's (Steve Grogan, Joe Ferguson, John Elway) over the finesse qb's
(Bledsoe, Marino, Montana). Hope Zolak butts a few heads.
|
56.1944 | YUK! | PCBUOA::EHS | | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:17 | 3 |
|
YUK!
|
56.1945 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:24 | 11 |
| Not good.....
And what was with that db from Denver. Everytime he made a play he started
jumping around like someone put Atomic Balm in his jockstrap. What's with
that? So the guy made play -- okay, go back and make another one....
I began to wonder if perhaps he had some sort of nerve affliction, like
what they used to call St. Vidas Dance.....
Is he okay physically?
|
56.1946 | yes I know, the LA Browns got hammered in Detroit | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:31 | 3 |
56.1947 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Oct 09 1995 11:37 | 13 |
| No, I don't think he has.
Something wasn't right with him last night. He was throwing very poorly.
They kept speculating that the tape job wasn't right and it hampered his
left arm.
Personally, I was thinking that they should have shot the shoulder up.
He might have thrown better.
He was throwing almost as poorly as Dave Brown does......
'Saw
|
56.1948 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 09 1995 13:26 | 1 |
56.1949 | Tuna may be a good coach but he's a terrible GM | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Mon Oct 09 1995 13:59 | 33 |
|
Bledsoe should not have played. As it was he didn't help the team
and only made himself look bad. I could only stomach the first half
but it appears that the Pathetictriots are back. This team has shown
absolutely no heart the last 2 games. The Tuna's draft picks and FA
have been a total bust. (Guess we know now who made the Giants a
winner).
Guyton I thought he was a big hitter?
Kratch What gives with this guy, can he move anyone?
Dallenbach Smerlas was right.
McGinist A little to early to tell but can you say Singelton?
White Proved why he was a back up.
Megget Yea he's worth 2.5 mill.
For two weeks the Tuna has been preachin about making changes. If
something don't give next week they'll be just playing out the string.
I just hope some of these idiots in the press will just ask him some
tough questions. He has had a free ride for the 3 years he has been
here and until this year made progress. This year they have gone back
a few years. Let Goad go for White, this just proves bigger ain't
better. Let Turner go, who has stepped it up in the backfield NOBODY.
The entire offensive line has been terrible. I never seem so many DL
in the backfield in my life. The 100% new and improved DL proved why
they where backups on their old teams. If they lost and showed they at
least had a heartbeat it wouldn't be so bad. But they look lifeless.
There isn't one leader on that whole team.
Jerry
|
56.1950 | Smelly | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:38 | 7 |
|
Quote from the 'ol Tunameister in our paper today. "We stink. We're
worse than I can describe to you." At least when he coached at the
AFA he had an excuse.
Kevin
|
56.1951 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:51 | 12 |
| So what happened? Granted they started with three pretty tough teams and
Bledsoe's not been himself since, but they seem to have no running game at all.
Did they lose some personal from last year that they were unable to replace
or do they have talent playing way below what they look like on paper?
See last year all of us in the SPORTS notes file were watching from the start
so we sorted out all the Patriots problems. This year all our attention is going
to baseball, we take our minds off football, and look what happens.
Shows to go yuh,
George
|
56.1952 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 09 1995 17:09 | 2 |
56.1953 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 17:10 | 5 |
| But last year they didn't look this bad.
What happened?
George
|
56.1954 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 09 1995 17:11 | 1 |
56.1955 | what a waste of time! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 10 1995 12:16 | 8 |
| I'll never make the pilgrimage to Foxboro for another night
game!...I'm glad I had Monday off. We didn't get home until
1am. And that was after leaving the stadium in the third.
billl
|
56.1956 | just stirrin the pot... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Oct 10 1995 18:01 | 6 |
| I got a question for Mike Childs and Frank Way...
who is worse as head coach?
a.)Dan Reeves
b.)Bill Parcells
|
56.1957 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Oct 10 1995 18:34 | 1 |
56.1958 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Oct 11 1995 08:58 | 14 |
|
Not even close. While Parcells isn't the best gameday coach in the
land or talent evaluator out there, he is a motivator and a coach
players put out for. Not sure what the problem is this year. I'd like
to blame it on ego and say Bledsoe has gotten bigger than coach but
he dealt with LT in NY so it can't be that. Maybe because LT had a
heart and Bledsoe doesn't?
Reeves flat out sucks! He can't motivate players, can't adapt during
a game, can't judge talent, without a doubt the most over-rated bum
walking the sidelines. The only coach worst than Reeves is Switzer
but he won't be exposed because of the brillance of Emitt and the OL.
mike
|
56.1959 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 11 1995 10:10 | 18 |
| What Mike said.
I couldn't agree more.
In fact, I've seen a few p-names that say "Parcells must go." Well, I'll tell
you what, I'll give you Dan Reeves and Herschel Walker and throw in George
Young for Bill Parcells. Fair deal? You can have all three of them.
One of the biggest problems I see with the Pats this year, and I have to admit
that I don't follow them as closely as the Giants, but what I see is Pat Harlow
being absent. I think they truly miss him, and the running game is sucking
as a result. JMHO.
But, I'd take Parcells back in a heartbeat.
'Saw
|
56.1960 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Still just a rat in a cage | Wed Oct 11 1995 10:53 | 9 |
|
> But, I'd take Parcells back in a heartbeat.
That's fine, just don't let him be the GM. Many of these personnel
decisions are looking dumber by the day...
glenn
|
56.1961 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Oct 11 1995 10:55 | 7 |
|
Parcells' problem is that he's no GM and he's hurt himself there and
has tried to justify his mistakes by playing his people. If he'd just
get back to coaching he'd be fine.
Just give Dan Reeves a last place schedule and he'll be fine. Raise the
bar a little expect disappointment..........
|
56.1962 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 11 1995 10:56 | 11 |
| >
> That's fine, just don't let him be the GM. Many of these personnel
> decisions are looking dumber by the day...
>
I'll agree with you there.
I'd like him just to coach.
Course we still need to get rid of George Young....
|
56.1963 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Oct 11 1995 11:12 | 22 |
|
>> One of the biggest problems I see with the Pats this year, and
>> I have to admit that I don't follow them as closely as the Giants,
>> but what I see is Pat Harlow being absent.
The Pats miss Harlow but his absence is a relatively small part of
the problem. The biggest problem is that virtually none of Parcells'
free agent acquisitions have panned out especially the d-line that
he brought in. Those bigger d-linemen are showing us why they were
second stringers on their old teams. The next one of them that gets
into the opposing backfield will be the first. This d-line may not
get pushed around but I don't think stationary is an improvement over
last year. Another problem is that Parcells shipped out 200 recep-
tions from last year. Thompson, Turner, and Timpson had close to
that many last year and they ain't here no more. It was thought that
Meggett and some free agents would make up for that but it ain't happ-
ening. Lastly, all the talk about appreciating Drew Bledsoe's great-
ness as it unfold has proven to be awfully premature. This kid has a
long long way to go before he's going to lead a team anywhere. Not
physicallty but mentally. And, imo, I'm not so sure, and never really
have been, that he has the head for it.
|
56.1964 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 11 1995 11:18 | 45 |
| > The Pats miss Harlow but his absence is a relatively small part of
> the problem. The biggest problem is that virtually none of Parcells'
Okay, I'll give you that because you watch them more than I do. It seems that
everytime I do see them, Harlow's replacement is screwing up.
> free agent acquisitions have panned out especially the d-line that
> he brought in. Those bigger d-linemen are showing us why they were
> second stringers on their old teams. The next one of them that gets
> into the opposing backfield will be the first. This d-line may not
> get pushed around but I don't think stationary is an improvement over
> last year.
Isn't one of the linebackers injured also? You can almost accept a line
that isn't penetrating if you can get an LB in there. That was the case
*some* of the time in NY, although Marshall and (earlier) Martin did penetrate
and awful lot in addition to Taylor and Banks.
> Another problem is that Parcells shipped out 200 recep-
> tions from last year. Thompson, Turner, and Timpson had close to
> that many last year and they ain't here no more. It was thought that
> Meggett and some free agents would make up for that but it ain't happ-
> ening.
Big problem, agreed.
> Lastly, all the talk about appreciating Drew Bledsoe's great-
> ness as it unfold has proven to be awfully premature. This kid has a
> long long way to go before he's going to lead a team anywhere. Not
> physicallty but mentally. And, imo, I'm not so sure, and never really
> have been, that he has the head for it.
Similar to the situation in New YOrk with Brown, except that Bledsoe, until the
injury, doesn't throw ruptured duck passes. Both have shown an amazing
ability to make amazingly STUPID decisions. I guess I'm chalking it up to
the dumbing down of America 8^)
'Saw
|
56.1965 | Mac deserved better | AKOCOA::BREEN | Onions, Tortellini and Thou | Wed Oct 11 1995 12:45 | 16 |
| I haven't seen most of the carnage this year, I did see some exhibition
activity and was completely fooled: I thought Parcell's problem was
HIDING how good this team really was.
Parcell has shown a lot of nepotism in his GM side, ex Giants both
players and coaches at premium prices, those with no connections let go
for $money and quickly picked up (Goad,Turner). Somebody mentioned
Singleton - he's playing for Miami isn't he?
It isn't that I've been truly suspect about Parcells all along, just
tried to be objective and one objective observation was that the key
people were pre-parcells except Bledsoe who was a free #1 courtesy of
the MacPherson '92 horror show. Except I'm not convinced that Parcells
is better than MacPherson - I haven't been shown that.
billte
|
56.1966 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:37 | 9 |
|
Saw,
I'd take Reeves, Walker, and Young for Parcells. Parcells is not
GM material and doesn't no how to manage money. The Patriots have the
3rd highest payroll in football. Parcell's is paying stiffs a million
a year.
Ron
|
56.1967 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:48 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 56.1966 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Parcells must go..." >>>
That p-name came around quicker than I thought. I don't expect the
press to lead that chant...at least not until next year when they're
again 1-4 (or the like).
Bill Parcells is probably a better motivator & disciplinarian than
he is a football strategist. He had some great talent on those
Giants teams and used smash-mouth football to win. He doesn't have
that talent with this team, and what talent he does have can't play
smash-mouth football. We may be seeing that Parcells doesn't know
any other way to play the game.
|
56.1968 | didn't expect it to only take 5 games! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:53 | 26 |
56.1969 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 12 1995 18:04 | 7 |
| > Write us in December and tell us what its like to watch Miami and
> Cleveland playing in the playoffs knowing New England didn't make it !!
> Don't forget to order a little salt to put on your crow !!
Cleveland is no lock to make the playoffs. Only one AFC central team
will go, and Cleveland doesn't appear to be head and shoulders above the
others in football's most pathetic division.
|
56.1970 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Oct 13 1995 10:15 | 13 |
| I think Parcells comes from the Lombardi school of football. Everyone knows
what you're going to do, but you just out-execute them.
His preferred style works well in the northeast, no doubt. He was capable of
changing styles -- his air attack last year was a surprise to a lot of Giants
fans.
I think he falls a bit short on the GM side -- perhaps that is his "Peter
Principle". But as a coach, I'd take him in a nanosecond over what we've
got now.....
'Saw
|
56.1971 | Sit his butt down for a few games | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:24 | 11 |
|
Yet again during yesterday's Pats game an opposing d-lineman
jumped offsides, the flag flew but yet again Drew didn't take
advantage of it. Instead, he intentionally threw the ball away
out of bounds. I count five times this season that he's not taken
advantage of the d-linemen jumping offsides. Then the critical
QB sneak on fourth down when we needed a foot might have been
as poor an execution of that play as I've ever seen. The whole
KC line would have had to take three steps backward for that
play to be effective the way Bledsoe went about it.
|
56.1972 | free play | HBAHBA::HAAS | conched out | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:28 | 16 |
| > Yet again during yesterday's Pats game an opposing d-lineman
> jumped offsides, the flag flew but yet again Drew didn't take
> advantage of it. Instead, he intentionally threw the ball away
> out of bounds.
I commented on this to a friend who tried to justify this as just
throwing it away. Evidently he learnt his football from the same place as
Bledsoe.
Drew, buddy, it's a free play. Throw it anywhere, just keep it in play.
You got nothing to lose so at least try to make something of it.
Right now, if'n you're rating thised year's major underachievers, Drew,
Ricky Watters and Andre Rison would have to be at the top of the list.
TTom
|
56.1973 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:37 | 7 |
| When Bledsoe was drafted, didn't the decision come down to him and another
quarterback who ended up being one of the 1st few choices?
If so, who was that, where he is, and how's he doing? In other words, did
Parcells take the wrong guy?
George
|
56.1974 | he's a player | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:46 | 14 |
| >Right now, if'n you're rating thised year's major underachievers, Drew,
>Ricky Watters and Andre Rison would have to be at the top of the list.
You're right on 2 of the 3, but you better check Watter's #s again TTom.
Before yesterday's 122 rushing yards, he was #2 in the entire NFL in
yards from scrimage (500 rushing, 247 receiving). His TDs aren't what
they were at SF (Philly has had an awful time scoring), but he's really
doing what he did for the '9ers.
Ricky Watters is a very popular whipping boy because of his emotional,
flamboyant nature, NOT because he can't play. He's a very talented
back, arguably the best multi-talent RB in the league.
He seems to suffer from the same public ignorance that plagues Deion.
|
56.1975 | like Meatloaf, 2 outta 3 aint bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | conched out | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:55 | 10 |
| You're right, Joe.
I was really looking through them Fantasy Football League glasses,
dontcha know.
It's a little personal with Rison since I traded in the off season for
him. Some deal, there, huh ;-(.
TTom
|
56.1976 | Dilfer? | HBAHBA::HAAS | conched out | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:57 | 6 |
| re: .1973
Wasn't the other guy Trent Dilfer who looks like he may be coming into
his own along with the Division leading Tampa Bay Bucs.
TTom
|
56.1977 | Get off'n Bledsoe will ya??? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Mon Oct 16 1995 16:58 | 3 |
|
Nope it was Rick Mirer. And no the Pats made the right decision!
|
56.1978 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 17:00 | 9 |
| Maybe, I seem to remember something about how Seattle had the 2nd pick
and the fans would have liked it if the Seahawks had taken Bledsoe because
he played college ball in Washington but Parcells took him and they had to
settle for someone else. Then they either took the other quarterback or
took someone else entirely when they couldn't get Bledsoe, I forget.
That sound familiar or have I been reading the Boston Globe too much?
George
|
56.1979 | The real scoop... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Oct 16 1995 18:06 | 8 |
| Lets put Ricky Watters stats in perspective. I was watching the
9ers lose yet another game they could have won with a decent kicker.
Anyway the new 9er back has virtually identical numbers to Watters
of last year with more touchdowns. I think Loville has 4 - 5
touchdowns. Yet the emotion is missing from the 9er offense and
that was partially provided from Ricky Watters... I think emotion is
what the 9ers miss most from Watters.
|
56.1980 | Gotta go for dazone when it b free | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Tue Oct 17 1995 08:17 | 15 |
|
re quite a few back...
About Bledsoe and the free play.....Phil Simms and McDopey where
talking about it after it happened. McDopey seemed to think it was
a good play ie "he knew it wasn't going to count just through it
away" and Simms saying something like "he's got a free play gotta go
for the endzone and try for a big play if it gets picked off it don't
count", I and most people agree with Simms. Its free take a shot and
see what happens, a big play TD in that situation turns the game
around. McDopey tried to justify what he said in his stupor but it
just didn't matter.
Jerry
|
56.1981 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 17 1995 08:58 | 20 |
| I'm confused about this "free play". As I understand, the "free play"
happens when the QB notices a defensive lineman jump off sides. It's a
free play because there should be a flag on the play against the defense
and if some disaster happens they can always take the penalty and nullify
the play.
Is that right?
If so, here's my question. What if the QB takes the "free play", disaster
happens, but in the opinion of the referee the defensive player was drawn
off side. The ref is wrong, the defensive player who is right in front of
the QB didn't move, but the ref is convinced he did and that he drew the
defensive lineman off sides.
In that case, what happens to the "free play"?
What are fans likely to say the next day about the QB for taking the "free
play"?
George
|
56.1982 | I'm not Jerry Markbreit, but.... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 17 1995 09:35 | 31 |
| >
> If so, here's my question. What if the QB takes the "free play", disaster
>happens, but in the opinion of the referee the defensive player was drawn
>off side. The ref is wrong, the defensive player who is right in front of
>the QB didn't move, but the ref is convinced he did and that he drew the
>defensive lineman off sides.
>
If the lineman is drawn offsides, it's no play because it happened before the
play starts.
I'm not John Hendry but I think it works something like this:
If the lineman move, or if the QB moves to draw the lineman
off, it should be flagged (and 99.9% of the time is) and the
play is dead before the snap.
If the QB draws the lineman off with a hard count, that's
fair game.
If the lineman goes offsides, a flag is thrown but the play
continues. If the offense gets a better play than the 5 yards
the offsides will net, than they decline, otherwise, no matter
what disaster might befall (inty, fumble etc) the offense
can always take the penalty and it nullifies any badness that
occurred. Thus a "free" play.
'Saw
|
56.1983 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 17 1995 09:36 | 11 |
| > If the lineman move, or if the QB moves to draw the lineman
> off, it should be flagged (and 99.9% of the time is) and the
> play is dead before the snap.
>
Should read if the o-lineman move
'Saw
|
56.1984 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Oct 17 1995 09:56 | 18 |
|
re .1981
If it's the offense that's offsides then the play is dead.
Your question is moot, George. When that flag goes up be-
cause someone jumped, it's a *no lose* situation for the
QB.
And to answer your previous question, no Parcells didn't
pick the wrong QB. He picked the wrong offensive coord-
inator and he should have hired a QB coach. Last year,
Drew got by being a thrower. This year he has to be more
of a quarterback and he's struggling badly. Fire Perkins,
hire an offensive coordinator that will take advantage
of Bledsoe's strengths and hire a Grogan or Simms to
teach the kid how to really play the position. Otherwise,
start Zolak. At least he can avoid the rush and improvise
because Drew is getting himself killed.
|
56.1985 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Tue Oct 17 1995 10:29 | 11 |
|
As people have said if the O-Line moved, or drew the D-line
offsides. The ref will throw the flag and blow the whistle. Its
done to protect the QB. If the whistle is not blown. Then it is on
the Defense. You might has well go for a big play.
The Patriots had 2 occasions. On the first one Drew had plenty of
time to throw the ball. He should have thrown it deep. On the
second one, he was being chased by 3 guys. Throw it away so you don't
take the hit.
Ron
|
56.1986 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Onions, Tortellini and Thou | Tue Oct 17 1995 12:33 | 8 |
| Well one time Bledsoe did continue with the "free" play and connected
and the refs brought it back and gave the Pats only 5 coming up with
some beauty about the defensive lineman having a clear shot at the qb
when in reality the defensive man that moved early was retreating back
to the line.
Official calls seem to be going against the Patriots this year whereas
last year they got the benefit.
|
56.1987 | Where have all the #11 Gameshirts gone??? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Oct 19 1995 16:37 | 1 |
|
|
56.1988 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Oct 20 1995 09:57 | 12 |
| > -< Where have all the #11 Gameshirts gone??? >-
They retired them in a ceremony on Opening Night.
Oh, wait a minute, you're not talking about THAT #11.....
Sorry.
|
56.1989 | Pats trounce Bills 27-14 | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Wed Oct 25 1995 09:40 | 5 |
| Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
NAZZ
|
56.1990 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 25 1995 09:54 | 9 |
| > Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
>
> Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
Hell of a victory -- from what I heard on the radio, they were firing on all
cynlinders, their RB netted over 100 yards, and Bledsoe was accurate and
intelligent.....
Didn't have a chance to say anything yesterday....
|
56.1991 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Oct 25 1995 10:11 | 9 |
|
I'll criticize... (just a little because I was generally pleased)
The score could/should have been bigger. Buffalo had a *lot* of turnovers,
giving the Pats tremendous field position, and a most of the time they didn't
convert to the degree that they could have.
They really dominated the game, but Buffalo had a chance to pull it out for
a lot longer time than they should have.
|
56.1992 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Oct 25 1995 10:22 | 20 |
|
>> Terrific game by the Pats Monday night and not a word about it in here?
>> Oh, it's so easy to criticize, but try to say something nice....
Yeah, It's real easy to criticize especially when you're 1-5 and your
$42 million QB looks like the second coming of Hugh Millen but here's
something nice... We were lucky Thurman Thomas got hurt because before
he did, he looked like he was going to run hog wild on us. It was 'nice'
that he went out with a pulled hamstring and never returned. And it was
nice that his replacement, Holmes, carried the ball like it was greased.
And it was nice that Andre Reed was out because even possession receiver
Billy Brooks managed to look like Bullet Bob Hayes against the Pats se-
condary. And here's something else nice, Sam Gash. Why the hell haven't
they been throwing more to Sam Gash all along? The guy can obviously
catch the ball and then punish defenders afterward. And especially
nice was Kevin Lee. Too bad we have to be on the brink of elimination
before the Patsies brain trust gives the kid some serious playing time.
Have a 'nice' day but let's keep last week in perspective.
|
56.1993 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 25 1995 10:23 | 5 |
| I'll criticize, too.
If the Pats are going to have an off season, why play well on the
one time I pick against them in the KOH contest ? (BTW, congrats
Tommy on the fine picks you made this year.)
|
56.1994 | | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Wed Oct 25 1995 10:40 | 13 |
|
re-.1992
You hit the nail on the head...exactly! Thomas, 4 carries, 42 yards, 2
receptions, 17 yards in the first quarter....Billy Brooks goes 45
yards untouched through the secondary...this is not a world class
sprinter.....
Dropped passes continue, red zone continues, fumbles.....lucky
Good points....Bledsoe looked a lot better but still threw to many
possible intercepts....Coates looked good as did Martin...running game
was ok especially the first half...they only averaged 3.3 ypc, better
than usual but not that great.....48 carries for 161 yards.
|
56.1995 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:03 | 2 |
56.1996 | key as always is defensive pressure on passer | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Oct 25 1995 12:14 | 8 |
| Everything went the Pat's way the other night with the single
consistent strong point being their great pass rush especially McGinest
and Slade who had great games.
Breaks are part of the game and the Pat's having been getting all bad
and finally got a bunch of good ones. Bledsoe's physical improvement
seemed to carry over to his mental side, the offensive line improved
but that had a lot to do with being able to balance the attack.
|
56.1997 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 30 1995 15:30 | 31 |
|
Where is the bottom? The Carolina game was about as bad as it
gets if you're a Pats fan. Not so much because Carolina is an
expansion team but just the way it all went down. And no it
was not at all Bledsoe's fault. You want to place blame? Start
with the soon to be unemployed punter, Pat O'Neill. Show of
hands, at this point how many Pats fans would put money on this
guy against the national finalists in the 12 year old division
of the PP&K competition? Not me. Move on to the receiving corps
who range from slow (Will Moore) to no hands (Kevin Lee) to
the rest of them who are a little of both. Now move on to the
offensive coordinator, Ray Perkins, who may be the most pred-
ictable guy since Paul Gronowski. The defense was barely any
better. Parcells brought in guys who are mammoth in size but un-
fortunately also glacial in speed. And the secondary which is the
second highest paid in football has to be the league's worst dollar
for performance deal. These guys tackle like monkeys play the
piano. The only saving grace would be our linebacking corps if
Vinny Brown's best years (all three of them) weren't well behind
him and Chris Slade wasn't so inconsistent. The only thing that
makes this year bearable is watching how it all plays out with the
new breed of Pats fans (read: bandwagon jumpers). At the beginning
of the year demand far exceeded supply for tickets and guys had
no shortage of customers for tickets at face value. The number of ads
looking for tickets exceeded the number of folks selling by 5:1.
But week by week the demand has dwindled to the point where the
numbers are reversed and guys are starting to take what they can
get, if they can get it. If we put together another year like this
one, these sunshine patriots will not only not buy Kraft a new dome
they might buy him a ticket to Hartford. If Hartford wants him...
|
56.1998 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:29 | 11 |
| Ok so baseball's over. Time to take a peak at what's going on with those guys
who throw the pigskin around.
So the Patriots are off to a slow start. Setback no doubt.
If I'm counting right the Pats have 8 games left, to against the Jets, two
against the Colts, one each against the Dolphins and Bills and two more. Would
that be the Rams and Saints? In any case, who's up next?
GO Patriots!!!
George
|
56.1999 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:51 | 6 |
|
>> So the Patriots are off to a slow start.
You really aren't paying attention.
|
56.2000 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:55 | 16 |
| Of course not, how can you pay attention to football when baseball is going
on?
So who's up next? Is this right?
Games to go
Jets 2
Colts 2
Dolphins 1
Bills 1
Saints 1
Rams 1
George
|
56.2001 | A fan tunes in before season 1/2-way done | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:04 | 16 |
| > Of course not, how can you pay attention to football when baseball is going
> on?
Or work and watch baseball ? Or chew gum and walk ?
I believe the teams are right: the NY-NJ Jets, the Bal-Ind Colts,
the Mia Dolphins, the Buf Bills, to NO Saints, the Cle-LA-StL Rams.
I don't think they play the Oak-LA-Oak Raiders, nor the Bos-Was Redskins,
nor the Chi-StL-Pho Cardinals; nor the Cle-LA Browns (oops, jumped the gun
on that one) as the Pats have already won that game.
But we need to watch out for those Dal-KC Chiefs, LA-SD Chargers, etc., etc.
In any case, I don't think the Bos-NE Pats are going to the playoffs this
year George, so you don't have to claim them as a team you are a fan of.
|
56.2002 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:10 | 10 |
| Oops, looks like I broke another rule and the Fan Fraud Department of the
P.C. Police are on my tail once again.
So do any of you REAL fans know who the Patriots are playing this week or
not? Hey, at least I'm interested enough to ask.
What about it Groner, am I that much less of a Patriots fan than the rest
of these guys because I don't tune in until after baseball?
George
|
56.2003 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:18 | 3 |
|
If you really want to know who the Pats are playing buy a newspaper
and find out, George.
|
56.2004 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:31 | 11 |
| Oh KAY, so EXCUUUUUUUUUSE me for trying to chat about the Patriots in the
Patriots note of the SPORTS notes file. Obviously the wrong thing to do.
That's two politically incorrect Patriots notes in one day. Dam if you P.C.
cops aren't firing real bullets.
I love it, not one "football fan" knows who the Patriots are playing this
week and I'm the only one who can come out and admit it. Guess you're right
Groner, these "Patriots fans" are strictly band wagon.
George
|
56.2006 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Just me'n the pygmypony,Yippy tyo | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:36 | 5 |
|
George
They play the Jets at home. Now stop whinning about the abuse your
getting, you deserve it.
|
56.2007 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:36 | 7 |
56.2008 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:37 | 24 |
|
They are playing Pittsburgh not the Rams. Here is the remaining
schedule. They MUST win ALL of there remaining games to make the
playoffs. Which would make them 7-1 in the AFC East. So if they happend
to finish in a tie at 10-6 for the division. They should win the AFC
East, On Tie breakers.
For the wildcard they would be 9-3 in conference play. Which would
put them in the playoffs. Unless they are tied with KC or Denver. They
lost to both of them. So the tie-breaker would be head-to-head.
The only team they could possible lose to is New Orleans and still
make the playoffs. Anybody else and they need a lot of help.
11/5 @Jets
11/12 @Miami
11/19 INDY
11/26 @Buffalo
12/3 SAINTS
12/10 JETS
12/16 @Pittsburgh
12/23 @INDY
Ron
|
56.2009 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:08 | 12 |
| >> They MUST win ALL of there remaining games to make the
>> playoffs.
Possible though not likely. Fourth place in the East might not be
too bad though because I believe it'll mean we'll get the Cowboys
at home next year. A fifth place schedule would mean the 'Boys on
the road as well a wimpy overall schedule that might give us the
illusion of progress with more wins without us actually being any
better. It's a little scary that at this point anyone would be hard-
pressed to point to anything on this year's squad and say, "This
is where we're better than last year or the year before." In several
areas we are definitely worse.
|
56.2010 | Trade Bledsoe for...who? [hypothetically] | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:10 | 30 |
| Bledsoe may not be a Joe Montana...few quarterbacks are. But neither
is he a Vinny Testaverde or Rick Mirer. Despite the poor season to
date, I'm still glad we have him. Salary cap and trading deadlines
aside, if Cleveland were offered Bledsoe for Testaverde straight up,
they'd be nuts not to pull the trigger. Is there ANY QB in the league
right now that anyone would trade Bledsoe for straight up? Maybe even
a Steve Young or Troy Aikman? What's the age difference? Experience?
Future potential?
I think Bledsoe is definitely suffering from a lack of quality
receivers. Even Coates is hurting, and without another premier target,
defenses are all over Coates.
At some point in his career, I'd like to see Bledsoe benefit from the
type of quality receivers that Montana had to throw to. Dwight Clark,
John Taylor, John Rathman, and of course Jerry Rice can really help a
QB's stats. And of course, Montana was surrounded by highly talented
players at several positions. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting
that Drew will ever be as good as Montana. Joe had the leadership
qualities and knack for winning that a coach dreams about. But unless
he has a chance to hook up with some quality receivers, we may never
know.
The Patriot Jim Plunkett and the Raider Jim Plunkett comes to mind as
an example. Free agency these days may tend to radically change over
the rosters from year to year. Those teams/coaches that find the right
mix and [somewhat overused cliche] team chemistry could be the most
successful. And, fit that in under the cap.
Ted
|
56.2011 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:23 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2006 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Just me'n the pygmypony,Yippy tyo" >>>
> They play the Jets at home. Now stop whinning about the abuse your
> getting, you deserve it.
Hey, there's an idea. In fact I like it. "P.C. Police abuse". People who feel
you deserve abuse from the P.C. Police because you were not Politically
Correct. Only in the SPORTS notes file.
Obviously several people who were very vocal Patriots supporters last year
are a little touchy over the fact that they've pretty much ignored this note
this season. What do you think Groner, could the wheels have fallen off the
Patriots Bandwagon?
George
|
56.2012 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:52 | 5 |
56.2013 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:55 | 8 |
| I don't know if you can blame Bledsoe for the team's problems. He doesn't
seen to get much protection, he's got no running game to take the pressure off
and his wide receivers are not exactly candidates for MVP at the pro-bowl.
He's young, he makes mistakes, but he looked pretty good when the Pats were
winning their last 7 in a row last year.
George
|
56.2014 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:02 | 3 |
56.2015 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:02 | 7 |
| >> Is there ANY QB in the league right now that anyone would trade
>> Bledsoe for straight up? Maybe even a Steve Young or Troy Aikman?
At this point I'd trade Bledsoe for Aikman, Favre or Jeff Blake.
That's it. Bledsoe hasn't had the best of seasons and his premature
coronation as The Next Big Thing makes him an easy target but there's
plenty of blame to go around.
|
56.2016 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:14 | 2 |
56.2017 | The tremendous talent is still there; we know that | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:16 | 12 |
|
> At this point I'd trade Bledsoe for Aikman, Favre or Jeff Blake.
> That's it. Bledsoe hasn't had the best of seasons and his premature
> coronation as The Next Big Thing makes him an easy target but there's
> plenty of blame to go around.
You starting to show Aikman some respect, Tommy? ;-) I don't know
about Favre or Blake. You just can't forget about his age; Bledsoe
is still a baby in terms of age and college/pro experience.
glenn
|
56.2018 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:17 | 6 |
| I agree with Farve. Blake not a chance, Mr. Pickens and Scott are
running under the lofted ball he throws. not that I'm complaining
as I'm benefitting in the FFL. Aikman will be out of football in
two years and will be on Inside the NFL's where are they now in 4.
Jimbo
|
56.2019 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:23 | 12 |
|
Paul wait a couple of years on Zeir. If the Browns go anywhere
with him in the next 2 years. Zeir will be wanting some serious
cash. At the moment Drew only accounts for ~11% of the salary cap.
Which is about 5 million.
Its unfortunate the the Pats didn't have stable ownership. The
year before the cap kicked in. So that they could do what Dallas and
other teams did. Dallas gave Aikman huge money the year before the
cap went into effect. So his huge contract doesn't hit the cap as
much as Bledsoe's does.
Ron
|
56.2020 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:37 | 20 |
|
>> You starting to show Aikman some respect, Tommy? ;-) I don't know
>> about Favre or Blake. You just can't forget about his age; Bledsoe
>> is still a baby in terms of age and college/pro experience.
Troy is a solid young QB who at this point is certainly better able to
lead a team than Drew is and given his age and experience that's as
it should be. Favre will be a superstar. His TD to INT ratio this
year is absolutely superb. The talent was always there now he's start-
ing to add in all the other things that make a great QB. As for Blake,
I've seen him three times and been very impressed each time. Granted,
he plays in the weakest division if football but the kid throws the
long ball, the short ball, feels the pressure and avoids the rush,
can scramble, he's a leader, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. As for
Drew and his age, he did that same move this past Sunday that irritates
me time and time again. A defensive linemen jumps offsides on 3rd down
and 7 and Drew throws a four yard pass. At some point, his age will no
longer be an excuse. And in terms of game experience he has more than
Jeff Blake.
|
56.2021 | Brent Favre's my main man | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Nov 01 1995 16:11 | 8 |
|
if it wasn't for his age, I'd consider throwing Bono in there. KC was
supposed to seriously drop off this year but are sitting at 7-1 thanks
to Bono. He has brought them back in games they have been trailing and
he certainly doesn't have an all-star supporting cast. I wouldn't argue
with any of Tommy's choices either especially Farve......
mike
|
56.2022 | | SALEM::DODA | The halfway house that Ruth built | Wed Nov 01 1995 18:03 | 3 |
| They *REALLY* need that megaplex now....
daryll
|
56.2023 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Wed Nov 01 1995 22:02 | 17 |
| A recent article in SI on Favre suggested his 26-year old body was in
considerably rough shape. That is not to say it isn't the norm for NFL
quarterbacks. He's put up some sparkling statistics spanning the first
half of this year and the last half of last year. I just don't know
how long he's going to hold together.
In my earlier hypothetical question, I asked if Cleveland would trade
Vinny for Drew straight up, without salary cap implications. That
means if they were out in the park choosing up sides for a game, who
would they pick first...Drew or Vinny. Considering some of the names
mentioned as who folks would be willing to trade, how about Vinny for
either Favre or Aikman. I think if you take the emotion out of the
decision [my hometown's team is better than your's], Vinny comes out
second-best. Yes, right now he has better statistics in many
categories. He's also on the bench.
Ted
|
56.2024 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 02 1995 07:15 | 8 |
56.2025 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Thu Nov 02 1995 07:28 | 5 |
| I didn't forget that Vinny has a shot at the playoffs. I intentionally
stripped all the other stuff away. Drew vs. Vinny: all other things
being equal - salary, city played for, receivers, offensive line,
coaches, the whole package. Leave the baggage out of it. Do you pick
Drew or Vinny?
|
56.2026 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Nov 02 1995 08:08 | 7 |
| Drew in an easy decision.
Vinny is the scapegoat for the 4-4 record, he was doing fine. His
only shortcoming was to not get Rison the ball. I love Zeier and
hope he does well, but Vinny was hosed.
Jimbo
|
56.2027 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 02 1995 08:08 | 27 |
| But to blame Drew for the Patriots not making the playoffs you'd have to
answer the question, what's he doing wrong this year that he didn't do wrong
last year when they made the playoffs. Well, the list appears to be as follows.
This year Drew:
- Fails to hand the ball to the running back in a way that causes them to
run for yardage.
- Fails to take the snap in a way that results in the offensive line making
holes for the runners.
- Fails to take the snap in a way that results in the offensive line
protecting the pocket.
- Fails to put proper spin on the ball so that when it's laid in the bread
basket of a receiver that receiver can hold on to the ball.
- Fails to throw or hand off the ball with such adhesive momentum that the
guy running with the ball doesn't drop it.
- Fails to watch from the bench with sufficient concern on his face to allow
the punter to kick the ball more than 90% the distance of the snap.
Yeah, we need a new quarterback. That will fix everything.
GO PATRIOTS!!
George
|
56.2028 | What a guy, that Jimbo! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Thu Nov 02 1995 08:32 | 6 |
| Re: -2026
I hope so too, Jimbo!!
JS
|
56.2029 | plus the defense sucks | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Nov 02 1995 08:51 | 13 |
|
Drew problem is simple he's thinking too much. He doesn't have the gray
matter to concentrate for that long.
2nd problem is the coach fell in love with him. He eased up on him plus
he like some NE fans thought Drew was the second coming so they
released all the good players that surround him last year figuring
Drew could throw to anyone, anywhere, anytime.
3rd problem Vincent Brisby is no big time receiver so the teams can
easily double Coates........
mike
|
56.2030 | QB = Too much credit + Too much blame | IROCZ::BKWAL | | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:00 | 23 |
|
I'll make a comment about Bledsoe then head back to the sore loser note.
RE: -2 That's a very interesting list. I'd propose a more limited agenda.
Try looking off the defensive backs occasionally. Bledsoe may have
a cannon and a nice touch but he wouldn't have to be quite so precise
if he didn't lock on to his target.
Bledsoe never was and will never be a scrambler. However, the better
pocket passers usually have a few moves when they come under pressure.
It seems if Bledsoe gets pressured up the gut and can't step up into
the pocket, he has little mobility side-to-side. Developing a little
slide step right or left would help.
Work on his ball handling. He dosen't appear to hide the ball very
well on fakes and doesn't shield the defense from seeing the handoff.
Would the Pats be winning if he did all of the above? Probably not. Would
it help the offensive and allow him to take less of a beating? I'd guess
so. Would it make him a better quarterback? IMHO yes. Will the coach be
calling me anytime soon for my input? Seems like he's managed to win a
couple of rings without it. I don't think I'll wait for the call. ;-)
|
56.2031 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:25 | 8 |
|
.2030 makes a lot of sense to me. .2027 sounds like someone who
hasn't watched the Pats all year and doesn't even know who they're
playing this week. Drew has his faults but as a Giants fan friend of
mine said of Phil Simms long before the Giants ever won their first
SB, "he's good enough to win with".
|
56.2032 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:32 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2031 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
>.2027 sounds like someone who
> hasn't watched the Pats all year and doesn't even know who they're
> playing this week.
So you are saying the Patriots do have a good offensive line, they do have
good runners, they do have receivers that hang on to the ball, they do have
a good kicker, their problems are all Bledsoe's fault and I'd know that if I
had watched the games?
If that's not what you are saying then your sentence above makes no sense.
George
|
56.2033 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:48 | 21 |
| > So you are saying the Patriots do have a good offensive line, they do have
>good runners, they do have receivers that hang on to the ball, they do have
>a good kicker, their problems are all Bledsoe's fault and I'd know that if I
>had watched the games?
He doesn't have to say those things at all. In .2027 you started with:
> But to blame Drew for the Patriots not making the playoffs you'd have to
>answer the question, what's he doing wrong this year that he didn't do wrong
>last year when they made the playoffs.
A good start. Then you give some bogus list and suggest Drew must be
responsible for all those problems. Those things are all major factors
in while the Patriots stink, no doubt, but don't think Drew gets off easily
and doesn't have to take a MAJOR share of the responsibility of the poor
season. He's had a poor season, no doubt about it, and THAT is what you
might (or maybe YOU wouldn't) know if yoiu had kept up with the first half
of the season.
I agree that your comments sound like comments from someone who likes Drew
and hasn't paid one bit of attention to the season so far.
|
56.2034 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 02 1995 09:55 | 7 |
|
No one's "blaming Drew for the Pats not making the playoffs".
It's been said time and time again in here and elsewhere that
Drew hasn't had a very good season (poor, really) but there is
a long list of reasons why the Pats probably won't make the
playoffs. George would know that if he was paying attention
instead of trying to get some.
|
56.2035 | Er Bill, me and the coaches were perfect, players didn't execute; fine Bill | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 02 1995 10:44 | 17 |
| I don't like to comment on the Patriots because I've only seen them for
the Buffalo game and some parts of KC that I taped, mainly second half
so I've seen the best of them. Against Buffalo the pressure by
McGinnest and Slade saved them in a game they refused to put away and
had every break go the Pat's way.
Bledsoe looked no different than last year; his big strength is a pin
point accurate pass of 10-25 thrown extremely hard; his weakness is
long throws where he still throws on a plane and lacks the throw which
has loft and sinks at the end. Perhaps for him to do this he'd have to
throw 60-70 yard bombs - his 40-50 passes are still on a line.
Pats need a quarterback coach and a General Manager. Ironically
today's Glove quotes Connie Fitzimmons about M.L. Carr's having both
positions and Connie talks about the need for balance and
accountability which Parcells lacks. Or, in more simpler terms,
Parcell's excuses fall on sympathetic ears, Mr. G.M. Bill Parcells.
|
56.2036 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 02 1995 11:03 | 20 |
| P.C. Police abuse continues from last year's Patriots fans who are guilty
about not still being on the Patriots bandwagon and are looking for someone
to kick.
Was the list I put in there right or wrong? Yes or no.
I suggested the patriots were
- having problems with the offensive line resulting in no pass protection
and no holes for runners,
- Have no running game
- receivers have been having problems holding on to the ball
- punters can't kick.
Now is that list right or wrong? Are those problems or not?
George
|
56.2037 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:04 | 12 |
| >> P.C. Police abuse continues from last year's Patriots fans who
>> are guilty about not still being on the Patriots bandwagon and
>> are looking for someone to kick.
I've been in here all along. You're the guy who admitted that he
didn't pay the Pats any attention until after the baseball season
was over. You're also the guy who professed to being a "rabid
Boston Braves fan" though you didn't start a Braves note until
after the Atlanta Braves were into their third World Series.
Someone who didn't know better might surmise that you just show
up anywhere you think you can draw attention.
|
56.2038 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:07 | 13 |
| George, George, George,
Can't you read ? Can't you ?
Every response to your questions indicated those were problems.
No doubt about it. No one ever said they weren't.
You were the only one suggesting Drew be blamed for those things.
No one will. We will blame Drew for lots of other things which
are his fault, and which have led directly to the poor scoring of
the Patriots this year, and their poor showing in the red zone.
Does that sink in now ?
|
56.2039 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:22 | 5 |
|
It wasn't just people responding to George who indicated
those were the problems. It's been stated *ALL ALONG* that
those were the problems. George just wants someone to play
with. Again.
|
56.2040 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:40 | 31 |
| Re <<< Note 56.2037 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> You're also the guy who professed to being a "rabid
> Boston Braves fan" though you didn't start a Braves note until
> after the Atlanta Braves were into their third World Series.
Prepare to eat your words:
<<< HUMANE::DISK$CONFERENCES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 20.74 The Atlanta Braves Note 74 of 1773
PAXVAX::MAIEWSKI 6 lines 22-MAR-1990 13:52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Boston Globe, Tom Glavine will get the start on opening day.
He said he was supprised that it didn't go to Smoltz. Also, there's still talk
around the Boston press of Lee Smith going to Atlanta. He says he wouldn't mind
playing there.
George (new Braves fan)
================================================================================
Oops, looks like I've been a fan since at least 22-MAR-1990. Guess you are
WRONG AGAIN Tommy.
Actually I think it's kind of funny the way you guys are obssessed with what
I say. No I don't clamer for that type of attention as you suggest, but it is
rather comical the way you guys follow me around like little puppy dogs.
George
|
56.2041 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:50 | 14 |
| >> Prepare to eat your words:
It is a fact that you did not start a Braves note until after
the Braves were in their third World Series. Look it up, George.
>> Actually I think it's kind of funny the way you guys are obssessed
>> with what I say.
Nothing could be futher from the truth. Go away, George. Need I make
that any plainer? It's obvious by the tone of your notes, especially
in this particular topic, that you aren't trying to add anything.
You're just looking for a reaction. You say folks are blaming Drew
for the Pats not making the playoffs. Where was that? Care to point
it out? No one ever said it.
|
56.2042 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Nov 02 1995 14:35 | 3 |
|
besides the pats still aren't mathematically eliminated yet from either
winning the division or a wildcard.........
|
56.2043 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 02 1995 15:20 | 4 |
56.2044 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Nov 02 1995 16:13 | 2 |
|
only if they get rid of Reeves...........
|
56.2045 | In case anyone cares about football in this note! ;-) | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:09 | 3 |
| New England 20, New York Jets 7.
NAZZ
|
56.2046 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:17 | 4 |
| > -< In case anyone cares about football in this note! ;-) >-
Is that what a Pats-Jets game is considered these days ? Football ?
Your definition of football is a lot more wider ranging than mine is.
|
56.2047 | What - enjoy a beautiful sunny day instead of watching this? | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:30 | 5 |
| An exciting gridiron tilt it was - two high caliber, professional
organizations dedicated to winning, no holds barred for 60 full minutes
of N-F-L action.
NAZZ
|
56.2048 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:32 | 7 |
| Hey, it's a win. One for the W column. When our guys are struggling, it's
something we can point to and say "that's a start".
Now if they can only bump off Miami next week they'll be on a roll.
Big if,
George
|
56.2049 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:06 | 10 |
|
> An exciting gridiron tilt it was - two high caliber, professional
> organizations dedicated to winning, no holds barred for 60 full minutes
> of N-F-L action.
That continues to be the No-Fun-League to many of us...
glenn
|
56.2050 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:16 | 6 |
| >> Hey, it's a win. One for the W column. When our guys are struggling,
>> it's something we can point to and say "that's a start".
That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't
watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.
|
56.2051 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:26 | 10 |
| > That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't
> watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.
Hey, that Carolina team is a powerhouse. They've got a better record than a
lot of teams in the league, and just knocked off the Super Bowl champs!
;^)
|
56.2052 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:50 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2050 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> That's what we thought after the Buffalo game ( I know, you didn't
> watch) then the Pats went out the next week and lost to Carolina.
Funny, even though I only watch 1/2 a year I'm 10 times the fan you will ever
be. At lest I'm trying to find something positive in a home team win.
The team that you saw the Pats lose to just knocked off the Super Bowl champs
to take their 4th in a row. And the Pats took Carolina into overtime which is
more than the 49'ers could do.
George
|
56.2053 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:07 | 19 |
|
>> Funny, even though I only watch 1/2 a year I'm 10 times the fan
>> you will ever be. At lest I'm trying to find something positive
>> in a home team win.
Keep the "what is or isn't a fan" debate over in that other note
so that I can easily avoid it. I don't care. I can find plenty
positive in this win, starting with the fact that it *is* a win.
>> The team that you saw the Pats lose to just knocked off the Super
>> Bowl champs to take their 4th in a row. And the Pats took Carolina
>> into overtime which is more than the 49'ers could do.
The battered, bruised and depleted 49ers. A nice Pats win yesterday
but they could very easily go out and lay down against the Dolphins.
I'd like to believe that things are turning around but *I've* been
watching them all year and it'll take more than a game or two to
convince me that they've turned it around. Strange though that 0-23
isn't a slump but two wins is "a roll".
|
56.2054 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Nov 06 1995 20:35 | 14 |
|
All summer I heard how the Pats could go 0-3 to start the season because
they had such a hard lineup.
Well, they went 1-2, with the "1" coming on a hometown ref gimme on
Drew's QB sneak. But still, the Pats felt really great because, darn,
those *were* hard teams. And then they kept losing. What's more,
those hard teams got beat by the Colts, the Saints, the Panthers...
Hey, I hope the Pats pull a huge winning streak, but I when I go to
Foxboro, I still see more players sitting on the bench than I do
getting fired up.
- Sean
|
56.2055 | Shaded optimism here for Pats | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:26 | 25 |
| Well I didn't want to comment until I saw taped game. I'd already read
and heard versions of it.
Bledsoe has indeed come a long way. He was excellent in all facets and
the play calling was pretty good against a team with some excellent
performers on defense in Jones and Douglas.
On defense Willie McGinnest has really come into his own and is playing
on a par with anyone in the league and Slade took advantage of Jets
weaknesses to make some big plays but Willie's speed and agressiveness
are the key to the Patriots right now.
The Jets had very poor offensive execution displaying Kotite's
inadequacies as much as anything. Foley looked good and would have
looked better if anyone could catch his passes. Shame he got hurt on
meaningless last play.
If the Patriots could look at themselves as an expansion team for whom
only great desire can propel to victory they can still be successful.
Willie and Slade could prove very tough for Miami to handle. Martins
stats were a little misleading as he had a lot of no-gains mixed with
long runs but I didn't have the second half on tape. Why?
Because I had filled the tape up with Doug,Rugrats,PowerRangers,Reboot..
for my son.
|
56.2056 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:50 | 5 |
| > Because I had filled the tape up with Doug,Rugrats,PowerRangers,Reboot..
> for my son.
"Doug" and "Rugrats" are cool. "PowerRangers" and "Reboot" sip. The
Patriots are somewhere in between...
|
56.2057 | Cracks me up... | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:58 | 1 |
| Rugrats and Doug are cool, add Rocko's Modern Life too...
|
56.2058 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:07 | 1 |
| The REALLY scary part is that I know these shows......
|
56.2059 | Going , gone | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:22 | 5 |
| Clarissa doesn't go over to big with me and Phil. My wife likes Reboot
and that other one with Squish and Mr ???.
You're right, PowerRangers seems to be slipping in popularity. We used
to have a half dozen on the couch singing gogo ... Top age 5.
|
56.2060 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:36 | 7 |
| > You're right, PowerRangers seems to be slipping in popularity.
That wasn't the point - they sipped at the height of their popularity. They
will sip forever.
Daryll's right - Rocko's Modern Life is way cool. I've only seen it a couple
of times, though...
|
56.2061 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:37 | 1 |
| A lot of those are really adult cartoons, that's why we think they're cool...
|
56.2062 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:39 | 2 |
|
Are you claiming you're an adult?
|
56.2063 | | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:42 | 5 |
| Anyone else notice that Rocko's theme is done by the B-52's?
2 Stupid Dogs is a riot too. Goes right over my 4yr old head....
daryll
|
56.2064 | ;^) | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:30 | 8 |
| >2 Stupid Dogs is a riot too. Goes right over my 4yr old head....
Which makes us all wonder how you can figure it out.
billl
|
56.2065 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:32 | 6 |
| >
>Are you claiming you're an adult?
>
Well, chronologically speaking.....
|
56.2066 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:43 | 7 |
|
>> What happens when the 1997 Patriots take the field in the new stadium
>> in Cleveland?
You might admit that Bledsoe > Testaverde?
Ted
|
56.2067 | And how old is she? Closer to 30 than 16 I'd bet | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:52 | 6 |
| I was definitely referring to PowerRanger's appeal to the 10 and under
set who weren't watching to ogle Kimberly. But wherever they
originally were they've gone down as the marketing geniuses have
tinkered with the simple humor of the original.
And if you think PRs is bad you should see some of the spinoffs.
|
56.2068 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 13 1995 09:20 | 8 |
|
One Squished Fish!
George
|
56.2069 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 13 1995 12:08 | 14 |
|
Easy to say something nice after this one because it was our
best game of the season. The nicest thing of the day was the
offensive line followed (literally) by Curtis Martin and also
Matt Bahr. It was also nice that the Pats managed to keep
Irving Fryar from going nuts like he usually does against us.
Much of the credit for that has to go to the d-line who finally
got the upfield push to free up McGinest and Slade on the outside.
When Marino did have time to pass, the secondary usually had
pretty good coverage. And credit Vincent Brown and the d-line
for keeping Miami to 75 yards total rushing. The biggest difference
in the game was that we could run and they couldn't. When the
Pats play like this, they can beat anybody. Unfortunately, they
don't play like this often enough.
|
56.2070 | Curtis Martin Roolz! | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Mon Nov 13 1995 12:12 | 0 |
56.2071 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 13 1995 13:32 | 15 |
| Well they sure are a hard team to figure. I have been licking my
wounds about a comment earlier about Parcell's pre-season problem of
"How to hide the wagon" that the Pat's had become. Then they were the
turnip wagon.
And now they are in better position than last year since it looks like
they can lose a game and qualify and ironically may have a shot at the
division crown since the competition all have problems.
I guess you just enjoy the good and shrug off the bad and not try to
figure it out - except excellent special teams have made a big
difference.
And speaking of running, until this week 9 out of 10 games the team
with better total run yards would win the game.
|
56.2072 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Da Raidas!!!!! | Mon Nov 13 1995 13:58 | 3 |
|
Yeah Ttom: your Welcome, (DECFF) :-)
|
56.2073 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Nov 13 1995 17:37 | 28 |
|
Even with a great team effort. They still have to stay focused and
win EVERY game. Yet, take it one game at a time. In order to win the
Division they need Buffalo to go 3-3 (With Patriots beating Buffalo),
Miami goes 4-2, Patriots 6-0. If the Patriots lose Buffalo and Miami
have to lose another game. Pats would win tie-break for Division
because of a 7-1 division record.
Realistically they should be looking for a wild-card spot. KC and
Raiders will take up 2 out of 6 spots. Expect Buffalo to win the East,
with either Pittsburgh or Cleveland taking the Central. Which leaves
2 wild-card spots left.
There are 10 teams with either a 6-4, 5-5, or 4-6 record. With 9
going for the 2 wild-card spots. One of the 10 will be the AFC Central
champion. If the Patriots finish at 10-6. They will have a 7-1
division record, with a 9-3 conference record. At 10-6 the only
possible tie-breaker they would lose. Is against Denver if it came down
to head-to-head matchups. A tie-breaker against anybody else, they
would win. The win the tie-breakers on either head-to-head, conference,
or division record.
If they finish at 9-7, its better for them to lose to New Orleans
then anybody else. Reason being is because they would still have a
7-1 Division and 9-3 conference record. They would be 0-4 against
the NFC (West).
At 8-8 they would need some help, but it isn't far fetched.
Especially if they lose to New Orleans plus somebody. Since they could
be 7-1 or 6-2 in division, while being 8-4 in conference.
Ron
|
56.2074 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 14 1995 07:59 | 5 |
|
Well it's a given they'll loose in Pittsburg. So they better win the
rest.......
mike
|
56.2075 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 14 1995 08:12 | 5 |
| Would that be anything like the given that the Cowboys would beat the 49'ers?
GO PATS!!! RUN THE TABLE!!! AGAIN!!!
George
|
56.2076 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 20 1995 10:42 | 25 |
| Ouch, that hurt. It appeared as though the Patriots lost the war in the
trenches. Every time Bledsoe went back to pass it was as if his offensive line
was all wearing white shirts and running toward him instead of away from him.
Well OK not every time but he sure doesn't have a lot of time to think about
where he's going to throw the ball. And once again not many holes for the
runners.
Tough loss, last week they beat a team that should have beat them (or so
Marino says) and this week they lost to a team they should have beaten. Boy
Harbrough (sp?) sure looked good with the time his line was giving him to
throw.
Oh well, maybe the problem was that the "A squad" had already left for
Buffalo and will take their 2nd in a row from the team up North. Stranger
things have happened.
Actually this is nothing new. I remember once back a couple decades ago when
the Baltimore Colts and Dolphins were fighting for the division and the Bills
and Jets really sucked. The Patriots finished the season by killing Miami and
Baltimore by 30-3 type scores but lost to New York and Buffalo in their last
four games.
Back to the right track,
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.2077 | So anybody actually watch it? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 20 1995 12:31 | 8 |
| Did anyone watch that Patriot game? Johnson and McGinnest were the
defensive keys to that team and Johnson indicated in the paper that
Faulk was just too much. I get the impression that Willie didn't have
the type of game he'd had the four or five previous.
But it was still 24 points given up which shouldn't have been
insurmountable - looks like mistakes,mistakes,mistakes killed those
Pats. Does all this moving franchises talk get these guys down.
|
56.2078 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 20 1995 12:46 | 13 |
| Well all that talk didn't get the Colts down. Maybe they were relieved of
guilt now that someone else has moved in to their old city :*)}
I think it was the trenches. When your guy is getting knocked down and having
to make hurried throws, your runners have no holes, their quarterback has all
day to make a throw and their runners have and holes wide enough to float
through on a barge then all your guys look bad and their guys look great.
As John Madden quoted Mrs Moose on the FOX game "They've got to keep their
backs flat on the blocks". The Patriots didn't appear have many flat backs
yesterday more like they were flat on their back.
George
|
56.2079 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 20 1995 12:52 | 9 |
|
You'd be hard-pressed to point to anything yesterday that
the Pats did better than the Colts. Both of the Colts' lines
played better than ours. Their skill people outplayed ours
including Harbaugh looking better than Bledsoe although Drew
was not helped by several dropped passes. Even Ben Coates
had two fumbles. All around it was just a poor effort from a
team that couldn't afford one.
|
56.2080 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 20 1995 13:23 | 18 |
|
In other news, last week Governor Weld raised the prospect
of a Kraft financed stadium on land owned by the state. The
idea has been summarily dismissed by Kraft's people as with-
out foundation. Poor Bill Weld was really naive enough to be-
lieve that Kraft would go against the current trend and act-
ually pay for his own stadium albeit on government land? Not
gonna happen, Billy. If Kraft had better leverage (read:Pats
were winning) he'd probably be putting the screws to us now
or at least mentioning it everyday to any reporter that would
listen. But the Pats are more erractic than Rosa Lopez and
Kraft knows what an idle threat it would be at this point to
threaten to take his Patsies to Hartford. We'll probably hear
the spectre of a possible move again this offseason but the
reality is that in a town like Boston and a state like Mass-
achusetts, Kraft's chances of getting a government financed
stadium are damned slim.
|
56.2081 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 21 1995 09:53 | 6 |
|
what's the scoop on cutting Hurst. seems his agent says he's playing
hurt? Will he get picked up and become a star for another team? Another
black eye for GM Bill Parcells.......
mike
|
56.2082 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 21 1995 10:04 | 8 |
| I don't see Hurst's leaving causing anyone a "black
eye", except for the owner that picks him up. Although
he's probably the best DB on the Pats, he's also one
of the worst cover men I've watched. He gets beat
more than a red-headed step-child.
billl
|
56.2083 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 21 1995 11:13 | 6 |
|
well Billl, Coach Parcells called him possibly the best cover man he had
ever coached. Now to cut him imo says that GM Parcells' evaluations
skills are questionable.
mike
|
56.2084 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 21 1995 11:48 | 14 |
| > well Billl, Coach Parcells called him possibly the best cover man
> he had ever coached. Now to cut him imo says that GM Parcells'
> evaluations skills are questionable.
That, IMO, speaks volumns about either the rest of the DBs
he's coached, Parcells' "evaluation skills", or (more likely)
my ability to judge DB quality.
I do know that if'n I was picking a team Hurst would
be one of the last DBs I'd pick.
billl
|
56.2085 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 21 1995 12:33 | 8 |
|
Hurst used to be a great cover man but he's completely lost
his confidence. You watch the Deions and the Rod Woodsons' and
they have a certain swagger and will outright challenge receivers.
Hurst, on the other hand, looked like the proverbial dog that has
been kicked too much. He was playing not to fail toward the end
and that inevitably leads to failure. I'll miss him because he
played hard for us but I won't miss watching him get burned.
|
56.2086 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 21 1995 13:51 | 4 |
| I thought he was terrific last year. Obviously he's been playing hurt
or has dropped precipitously. He was one of the three or four keys to
the success of last years team: Goad,Turner...(I guess that tells us
about all we need to know of this year's team).
|
56.2087 | Maurice " Run right by me " Hurst, Outta Here! | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The Land Of The Stainless Maiden | Tue Nov 21 1995 23:20 | 11 |
| RE.2083>> well Billl, Coach Parcells called him possibly the best
cover man he had ever coached.
Incorrect quote! He said that hurst has a chance to be the best
coverman he ever coached. This of course was said at the start
of pre-season I believe. Man Oh Man am I glad to see him go, but
who am I going to direct my anger at now?
Go Tuna!
Lil Ed
|
56.2088 | Tuna is a egomanic that cannot admit he can't be a GM | AD::HEATH | Relax its only October they got time | Wed Nov 22 1995 08:19 | 16 |
|
I know I'm in the minority but yes, Hurst has had a bad year but for
the past 4 years has been the best CB on the Pats. Lil Ed, yea lets
evaluate 10 games and make it a career, come on Hurst is better than
Reynolds by a long shot. In fact Hurst is the best DB on the team. He
has been playing with no confidence for a reason. Guyton NEVER seems
to be where he is suppose to be, if he does get there its a day late
and a dollar short. Only reason Guyton is still here is the ex-giant
factor. Hurst was here when Tuna got here and putting the blame on him
is just his way of not admitting a mistake. He signed Guyton and
Reynolds both to big contracts and neither have played even good since
their arrival.
Jerry
|
56.2089 | Lost what little respect I had left for BP | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Nov 22 1995 08:23 | 19 |
|
Gutless move by Parcells.
How does Hurst go from starter to fired in one day (by a coach who
claims not to make Monday decisions)?
Answer: he's not one of Bill's boys. Gee, there's $1.4M Dellenbach
riding the pine, benched for $119K Wollobaugh. Gee, there's
Guyton, arguably twice as bad as Hurst. Is Megget really worth the
$$$$$?
A team with Hurst, Goad, Turner, Hurst, Thompson, Timpson went 10-6.
Despite Parcells, not because of him. Well, old Bill took care of
all that, and now what's left - *HIS* team.
Yet Mr. Ego won't even admit when he sucks as GM, and makes sure
players he had nothing to do with get tagged scapegoat. Gutless.
- Sean
|
56.2090 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 27 1995 08:22 | 15 |
| This is one of those cases where you take your nose between your thumb and
for finger, squeeze firmly but not so much as to cause pain and say "OK another
one for the W column, we'll take it."
7-9 dropped balls, at least, 2 turn overs, several untimely penalties and
still the Patriots beat the division leading Bills for the 2nd time this year.
The announcers seem to be praising Parcells for sending the team a wake up
call by releasing Hurst. Also they said that they may have wanted to gave the
new kid Law a chance to play.
Now if the Pats can keep it going and beat the Saints and Jets they will
be all even up at 7-7.
George
|
56.2091 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 27 1995 09:45 | 2 |
56.2092 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 27 1995 09:55 | 6 |
| Where do you see a bandwagon? I've been a fan since Kraft bought the team
and I don't see any other note so far today.
The Patriots seem to be a team with very few bandwagon type fans.
George
|
56.2093 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 27 1995 10:13 | 9 |
|
Yesterday's game wasn't anything to get too excited about.
The Pats still don't have defensive push up the middle. Ty
Law looked good on his INTs but then was way out of position
at least twice, one of which resulted in a Billy Brooks td
without a Patriot within 20 yards of Brooks. Bledsoe is still
inconsistent as are his receivers. If Buffalo had stuck with
the dives up the middle that were working when Thomas went out,
the Pats might not have won the game.
|
56.2094 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Nov 27 1995 10:17 | 19 |
|
Patriots suck everybody in for another week. Lets concede playoff
spots to KC, Raiders, Pittsburgh, and Buffalo. Which leaves us with
2 spots left. Indy should make the playoffs, unless they choke. All 4
remaining games are against sub .500 teams. Carolina/Jacksonville/
San Diego/New England.
The Pats need help but not that much. If they finish at 9-7 they
will make the playoffs.
Indy 7-5
Miami 6-6
Denver 6-6
Patriots 5-7
Cincinatti 5-7
Houston 5-7
Seattle 5-7
Ron
|
56.2095 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 27 1995 10:33 | 3 |
56.2096 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 27 1995 10:49 | 8 |
| The Patriots need to stop making stupid mistakes and they need to develop
some consistency. If by some miracle they run the table again and make the
playoffs that's fine but for now I'd be happy with seeing them play a good game
next week against the Saints.
One at a time,
GO PATRIOTS!!!
George
|
56.2097 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Nov 27 1995 11:39 | 11 |
| re .2095,
The Patriots were 1-5 the first 6 games. They have now gone 4-2
in the last 6. After the Monday night game, they had a let down and
took Carolina lightly. Plus, they have lost to Indy. All in all not
a bad 6 game stretch. Add into the mix that Bledsoe's shoulder is
healed, Coates ankle is healed, the offensive line changes have
produced a running game. I think they can win the rest of the games.
Ron
|
56.2098 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Mon Nov 27 1995 11:41 | 7 |
|
I've gotten to the point where I don't care if they make the playoffs. With
last year's team, there was a feeling they could make some noise. Even on the
off chance that they make it this year, their pass defense will get
*shredded*...
Bill Brooks was in his own zip code a couple of times...
|
56.2099 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:15 | 9 |
| Agreed, the thing for the Patriots now is to just show some consistency.
Winning playoffs is for another year. If they play some solid football, beat
the Saints and Jets and split with the Colts and Packers that will be more than
enough.
Meanwhile how about them Colts? Are they for real or are they playing above
themselves? If they keep this up they may just win the division.
George
|
56.2100 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:26 | 11 |
|
I ain't giving up on this season and the playoffs that easily.
It'll take some doing to get there but the way the AFC is shaping
up, it's anyone's ball game once the playoffs start. The Pats have
to actually get there and given the way they've played all season
that's a big question mark. But if they do make it they could put
together a run like San Diego did last year because I really didn't
think SD was the best team in the AFC they just git hit at the right
time. Of course, our secondary trying to cover the Raiders receivers
could be pretty ugly but anything can happen in a one-and-done
format.
|
56.2101 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Nov 27 1995 14:42 | 3 |
|
Steelers are coming together better than Patsies and will take them out
of their misery.......
|
56.2102 | My glass is half full! ;-) | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | So long Sherm! | Tue Nov 28 1995 10:05 | 6 |
| I refuse to concede a playoff spot to Buffalo. I think they will
finish 9-7, and will lose all tiebreakers with the Pats. NE could
even still win the AFC East with a lotta help (a Colts collapse would
do the trick, along with MIami going 2-2 in their last four games).
NAZZ
|
56.2103 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Tue Nov 28 1995 10:15 | 3 |
| >along with MIami going 2-2 in their last four games
You think they'll do that well?
|
56.2104 | McDonough on free agency ruining football because he can't pick'em anymore | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 28 1995 11:27 | 15 |
| I meant to post a note re. Will McDonough's Saturday morning article.
He was complaining again about free agency spoiling NFL football but
one of his arguments was the poor performance of he and his colleagues
in his weekly Globe picks that they post on Friday. Unbelievable.
Those schmucks having been able to pick ever except for a few lucky
strings.
He's such a blatant shill for Kraft and NFL ownership perse.
Actually this has been a very predictable year. The teams that run the
ball win and those that can't stop the run lose. The hard part is
predicting who can and can't run. The other oddity is the games going
to overtime and having touchdowns decide the outcome rather than field
goals; not to speak of late interceptions and fumbles being decisive.
|
56.2105 | Been a big fan for a few years.......don't make sense | AD::HEATH | Relax its only October they got time | Tue Nov 28 1995 12:24 | 16 |
|
I'll have to second what Tommy said about givin in for this year.
The Pats could very easily go 4-0 end up 9-7 and sneak in the back
door to the playoffs. They also could go 1-3 (with a win against the
Jets). The 4th quarter comeback on Sunday sorta reminded me of the
comeback win over Minny last year that sent them on their way, I really
believe they will go 4-0 and end up 9-7. They will end up with only 2
div losses which should be good enough for any tie-breakers and I think
their conference record ain't that bad. 3 losses have come against the
NFC. I am not counting them out but as someone said they've been a fan
since Kraft bought the team probably wouldn't understand that there are
16 games in an NFL season in '95 and we've only played 12.
Jerry
|
56.2106 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 28 1995 12:31 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2105 by AD::HEATH "Relax its only October they got time" >>>
> I am not counting them out but as someone said they've been a fan
> since Kraft bought the team probably wouldn't understand that there are
> 16 games in an NFL season in '95 and we've only played 12.
I'm the one that said I've been a Pats fan since Kraft bought the team but
I'm sorry, I can't parse the sentence above.
Who is it that doesn't understand the number of games played per year and
what does that have to do with being a Pats fan?
It's my understanding that each team plays 16 games, half in their division
and the rest divided between the teams of one division in the other conference
and teams of about your same level in your own conference. Is that wrong?
George
|
56.2107 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 28 1995 12:39 | 7 |
|
I thought it was kind of strange when George said that there
weren't many bandwagon jumpers amongst Pats fans in one breath
and then in the next breath said he's been a Pats fan since Kraft
bought the team (that's almost four whole years!) but I've prom-
ised myself that I wouldn't respond every time I thought George
said something ridiculous. It ain't easy.
|
56.2108 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 28 1995 14:10 | 17 |
| So if there is an expansion team and they have only been playing for 4 or
less years does that mean that all their fans are bandwagon fans? Or is there
an exemption in the rigid set of fan rules for expansion teams?
What's ridiculous Tommy is your assertion that there is some sort of set of
rules dictating who can be a fan and who can not. It's about as ridiculous as
your rigid rules as to what sports can be discussed and what sports are
politically incorrect.
These games are children's games being played by grown men and women for
the purpose of our entertainment, what sense does it make to say that there
are rules saying when we can and can not be a fan? Why can't someone become
a Patriots fan when they feel like it?
Lighten up, sports are suppose to be for fun.
George
|
56.2109 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 28 1995 14:24 | 6 |
56.2111 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:06 | 6 |
| Well I don't know but George if you've been a Mass resident all your
life or for longer than 4 years why then did you all of a sudden become
a Patriot fan 4 years ago? Did you never watch football until 4 years
ago?
mike
|
56.2112 | What 1993 bandwagon | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 28 1995 15:56 | 9 |
| I would hardly call Kraft's first year jumping on a bandwagon since
they'd only won one game the previous year under MacPherson and
Orthwein. I could see people who'd lost interested in the
Berry/Remington years coming back for Parcells but there was not to be
a true Bandwagon until December of last year and a short lived one at
that.
Anybody coming on the Pat's "bandwagon" at this point belong in the
optimists club not the bandwagon.
|
56.2113 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Nov 28 1995 20:07 | 28 |
|
I have a problem with the term "bandwagon jumper."
I have season tickets. Before I could afford them, I'd go to 4 games
a year except in college in Syracuse (but I'd always see the Pats in
Buffalo).
I remember being called a bandwagon jumper for saying we'd never win
with Eason, saying getting rid of Flutie was stupid, saying that Meyer's
1985 team went to the Super Bowl despite being under Berry rather than
because of it. Being negative/realistic/critical seems to equate to
"bandwagon jumper."
Unless you wholeheartedly support positively every move your team ever
does, slobbering with worship over every nincompoop decision ownership
makes, you get called a bandwagon jumper from time to time.
Anyway, I've learned to live with it. I've followed the Pats
religiously since I was old enough to watch TV. I always root for 'em,
but I criticize and boo what I think are dumb moves. Whatever that
makes me, it does.
So I guess I'm a bandwagon jumper for never liking the hiring of
Parcells and thinking we're not going to win a SB with him at the helm.
I hope he does, but... And still, I pay my $1K for tix every year.
- Sean
|
56.2114 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 29 1995 07:58 | 6 |
56.2115 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:21 | 23 |
| Ouch, that was a tough loss.
Ty law seems to be in on lots of key plays which is both good and bad. It's
good because he's got talent and sometimes makes the play. It's bad because
he hasn't played much and it shows. There seemed to be at least a couple
touchdowns where his guy either ran past him to catch the ball or ran around
him with the ball but then he comes up with interceptions. I think it bodes
well for the future, he's likely to learn how to play before he gets too old to
play.
That last interception by Bledsoe hurt. I kept thinking "throw it away,
throw it away" but that's not what I meant. I sort of had the 5th row behind
the endzone in mind.
No doubt this erases what ever chance the Pats had for the playoffs, no team
makes it with 8 losses even with 3 wild cards per conference. Bummer. But
there seems to be some young talent around and they can win when they are
playing well so the future looks good.
Next week the Jets. It will be tough to finish 8-8 but they can do it.
GO PATS!!!
George
|
56.2116 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:46 | 14 |
| This was simply a better team beating a mediocre team. Last year's
team probably could win but this team wasn't good enough. I thought
perhaps a warm weather team would have problems with the cold but it
was the Pats that weakened in the cold. Can't recall too many Patriots
teams that gave up in the cold, even the awful teams. For one thing it
shows a lack of true leadership on the defense.
I saw the Saints survive the very tough Panthers last Sunday night and
could see they would be very tough this week. Have to give old Jim
Everett a lot of credit he's had a tough career but now is one of the
top quaterbacks in the game. He'd make a good mentor for Bledsoe but
appears to have a few years left in his own right.
Ironically the Pats are still now completely out of it.
|
56.2117 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Dec 04 1995 10:00 | 13 |
| From what I saw and heard, it looked to me like the Pats defense got whipped
like a red-headed stepchild....
Nawlins is playing good ball -- after dropping five stright they'd one 6-2
going into the game I believe.
I think this season is a bump in the road for the Patriots, but a lot is going
to hinge on Parcells' ability to evaluate and recruit talent.
IMO, Parcells is a good coach, but he's not that good of a GM.
'Saw
|
56.2118 | Ode to Tuna | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 10:20 | 20 |
|
Thanks Bill, savior of the Pats!
Thanks for getting rid of that crappy 10-6 team of Goad, Turner, Timpson, Thompson
and others and building this awesome 5-8 juggernaut!
Thanks for getting that $42M boy Forrest Bledsoe a qb coach so he
wouldn't be making 1st and 2nd year mental mistakes in his 3rd year.
Thanks for Ray Perkins and Al Groh!
Thanks for your those insightful views on how you "found a way to win"
in your post-game dissertations ("I honestly don't know what's wrong
with this team") It's okay - we didn't pay you all that money to
know, buddy!
Only question is, how come you keep playing that "one game wonder"
Curtis Martin? Why don't you get rid of him, too!?
Just thanks for the best Christmas ever!
|
56.2119 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 04 1995 11:05 | 4 |
56.2120 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 11:30 | 7 |
| The Band Wagon is Alive!!!
Any time a Boston team goes against a New York team it's secondary what's
at stake.
GO PATS, BEAT THE JETS!!!
George
|
56.2121 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 04 1995 11:58 | 21 |
|
Really dumb pass by Bledsoe to seal the loss but the
way the defense played yesterday we didn't have much
chance of winning that game. Their hogs beat our hogs
one on one all day long. Despite the offseason signings
our front seven is still woefully inadequate. We couldn't
generate any pressure on Everett at all without the blitz.
And when we did blitz, he was successful at making us pay
for it. Then there were the mental lapses and the poor
tackling by the secondary yet again and you have wonder
things like - how many of these guys are good enough to
play on a championship calibre team? And if this team
keeps taking one step forward then two steps back, how
long is Big Tuna with the bum ticker going to stick around
at his age? For those of us who were expecting the Pats
to make another step closer to being a SB contender this
year, yesterday's loss was the capper on a disappointing
season.
|
56.2122 | | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:28 | 3 |
|
After game 1, headlines in the local rags....Parcells was called a
Genius....
|
56.2123 | Gawd they seem to be gettin worse, Parcells is a terrible GM | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:31 | 10 |
|
Dumb is an understatement Tommy. I was listening to the game on the
way back from the Legion Christmas party was Gil and Gino where really
hammerin da boyz. Gino said it looked like the defense where running
in cement. They had nothing really positive to say 'cept that Martin
had another good game.
Jerry
|
56.2124 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:49 | 5 |
56.2125 | Worst of all, nobody will bench him. | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:56 | 35 |
|
Bledsoe is An Arm.
Nothing more. Stupid as they come, and the definition of
unmotivated.
He's got a great Arm, and that's the only reason he's had any
success. No question, he can place the ball in spots no QB can.
So the fact that he doesn't know how to look past his 1st or
maybe 2nd receiver hasn't always hurt him. He just looks at the
first guy, who's about to get creamed by 3 defenders and rockets
it in there. This is a great way to treat wide receivers, by
the way.
And that's it. As team after team has stated in post-game
talk, the ability to pressure Bledsoe is the ability to undo
him. He is a rabbit. Scared of everything, and useless out of
the pocket. Can't run, can't bootleg, can't think.
I know all the excuses - he's young. He's not there to scramble.
So fine, if everything else on the team is *perfect*, the best O Line
in the world, a great running game, fast WR's, then the $42M boy
can do well. But, like, who couldn't? And for less $$$.
Is he 23 year old QB, with all its failings, or is he a $42M
QB, with all its expectations. He can't be both, and since he
clearly seems to be the former, he shouldn't have been paid like
he was.
Forrest Bledsoe has one and only one tool, and I don't think
1) he cares to improve on that 2) the team cares to force him
to (where's his QB coach).
|
56.2126 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 12:57 | 7 |
|
> Bledsoe continues to show he is inferior to Testaverde. Bledsoe is a
> flash in the pan, he had one mediocre year with loads of TDs and INTs
> and everyone got excited.
Not everyone.
|
56.2127 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:00 | 4 |
56.2128 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:14 | 12 |
| Well 23 is really young. I think Bledsoe has time to learn a few of these
things.
Last year wasn't he contending for a pro-bowl spot? Seems they ran off those
last 7 wins in a row primarily on a passing game. No team does that without
a QB that has some talent.
I think he has the potential. Seems that it's easier to teach a QB with an
arm how to find an open man than it is to get someone with a good eye and no
arm to hit an open man.
George
|
56.2129 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:22 | 16 |
|
Bledsoe did't just contend for the Pro Bowl, he was in
the Pro Bowl. Some folks got way too excited when we did
well and now other folks are way too down on him now that
we're struggling. Bledose threw a dumb pass but it was
not Drew Bledsoe who gave up big play after big play yester-
day. I get just as frustrated as the next Pats fan when he
does things like yesterday's game clincher but I still
think that though he's no Marino, he's good enough to win
with. I wouldn't say the same about 60% of the rest of the
team. Right now for keepers' on this team I like our offensive
line and our skill people with the exception of our receivers.
Our defense is mediocre. No one's job should be safe because
we could stand an upgrade at virtually every position with
the possible execption of Chris Slade. If we have one big plus,
it's that on the whole we're young.
|
56.2130 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:27 | 8 |
|
re Groaner
I hear that if Modell gets hauled to court over his proposed
move, his defense will be to simply show pictures of the city
and then to bring forth a couple of typical Clevelanders like
Hal and yourself. If thats the case the judge'll probably vol-
unteer to help him pack.
|
56.2131 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:28 | 28 |
|
Last year was a surprise. They took teams by surprise.
Good teams don't get caught by surprise twice. They all
went off and figured out how to exploit the deficiencies
of Drew and came back this year and did it.
Stodgy Bill and his lumbering stubborness doesn't apparantly
understand that you've got to keep changing and reacting
to things. I swear to the heavens I was half expecting to
see Bill bring Craig "You gotta run me more, coach" James
back so I could hear that music to my ears over the Foxoboro
loudspeakers... "Handoff to Craig James. Up the middle. Loss
of 2."
Curtis is a great surprise this year, too! And guess what?
They'll screw that up, watch! Next year, teams will decipher how
to defend against him, and where will Bill be? Without a clue and
without an answer. "Der, 50 consecutrive runs of Curtis up worked
last year, what happened this year?"
Just like Ben Coates. He was all pro last year. Still a great
receiver, but teams figured out the deal this year, and he's
not even in Pro Bowl contention. Not his fault - it's the
infuriating system.
- Sean
|
56.2132 | He just does not Think! | PCBUOA::EHS | | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:37 | 7 |
|
I dont know if he can be taught (Bledsoe) he needs a Good "Game Mind"
in order to perform under different situations, and he simply can't
consistently think. He is like a Rabbit (scared!)
IMO,
ED
|
56.2133 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Dec 04 1995 13:47 | 62 |
| > Stodgy Bill and his lumbering stubborness doesn't apparantly
> understand that you've got to keep changing and reacting
> to things. I swear to the heavens I was half expecting to
> see Bill bring Craig "You gotta run me more, coach" James
> back so I could hear that music to my ears over the Foxoboro
> loudspeakers... "Handoff to Craig James. Up the middle. Loss
> of 2."
Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.
Everyone in the world knew the Giants were going to run on first down.
Everbody! Guys in the Soviet gulags knew that the Giants were going to run on
first down.
Until the Giants had an offensive line that could almost guarantee five yards
on that first down rush, it drove Giants fans nuts. But then along came the
Suburbanites. They moved everybody outta the way, including the Redskins
defensive line, which was pretty big at the time.
Every once in a while, every once in a while, he'd pass on first down.
But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.
True, he's got Ray Perkins as OC, and let's be honest, Ray is so conservative
that he makes Rush Limbaugh look like a bleeding heart liberal, but once the
teams gets the horses to make the plan work, it does work well.
I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.
> Just like Ben Coates. He was all pro last year. Still a great
> receiver, but teams figured out the deal this year, and he's
> not even in Pro Bowl contention. Not his fault - it's the
> infuriating system.
Wrong. The Giants used the TE up the seam play for years, with Bavarro and
later with Howard Cross (who actually developed some hands over time).
What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.
I think that Parcells as a GM leaves a lot to be desired, if this year is any
indicator. Parcells as a coach will build contenders.
What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work. Can Bill be trusted
to get that personnel? I dunno.
I know one thing: Bill alone doesn't appear to have the GM skills, but then
again, since Bill left New York, George Young has been more like Curley of the
Three Stooges than a Super Bowl-builder GM.....
Go figure.
'Saw
|
56.2134 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:13 | 4 |
56.2135 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:16 | 36 |
|
> Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
> very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
> a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.
Oh, was Bill GM there, too? NOT! In fact, if I remember correctly,
most of his "most wanted picks" were overridden by the GM, with
those new players actually doing MVP work most of the year.
Bill as coach *could* work maybe. Maybe! I'm sick of hearing about
what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint. Here, with
full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.
> But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
> lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.
No one's asking for that! Trust me, not with Drew's INT rate!
> I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.
Yeah, yeah. Chemistry of all the pieces in that puzzle had nothing to
do with it. It was all Bill.
> What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.
So what if there was? Drew doesn't look for the other stuff. He
follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
receiver. Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter
than Drew.
> What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work. Can Bill be trusted
> to get that personnel? I dunno.
Well he can't. How much more proof is needed?
- Sean
|
56.2136 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:25 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2135 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>
> Bill as coach *could* work maybe. Maybe! I'm sick of hearing about
> what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint. Here, with
> full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.
Remember, he went forward before he went backward. This team was winning
an average of 2 games a year before Kraft and Parcells took over. He's been
going steadily forward ever since and now he's had one year of moving back.
If they keep up 2 years forward 1 year back that will get them there in the
long run.
> So what if there was? Drew doesn't look for the other stuff. He
> follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
> receiver. Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter
> than Drew.
I think what they are referring to is the fact that even from play to play
Bledsoe doesn't have any where else to go. The teams can cover Coats like
a blanket on every play because they know if anyone else is #1 or #2 on a
play they won't hold on to the ball. With Turner running out of the backfield
the linebackers had to be a bit more careful.
George
|
56.2137 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:39 | 14 |
|
Sean, who works two aisles over from me, isn't exactly correct
when he says that Coates won't be going to the Pro Bowl this year.
Though his numbers aren't as high as last year when set a record
for receptions by a tight end they are still good enough to have
him amongst the top 2 for tight ends. And that's with the extra
attention he's been given by defenses all season. And George is
misinterpreting the part about Drew not going anywhere else. Drew
locks on to receivers. It's a bad habit he's always had and some-
thing he occasionally gets away with because of his strong arm.
The play that sealed our fate was as example of a play where he
didn't get away with it. The play looked like it was designed
for Coates, Drew locked onto Coates and the threw it despite the
fact that Coates was covered.
|
56.2138 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Ain't this boogie a mess | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:48 | 9 |
|
I would like to bring up one point. It takes an average of five
years for a QB to learn how to read defenses and the various coverage
techniques being used. The better Qb's we have today started in much
the same manner as Bledsoe. Poor TD to Int ratio, not knowing how too
look off the prime target, throwing into double coverage etc;, give the
kid a chance. He'll pan out or they'll run him off like they did
Plunkett.
|
56.2139 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 15:01 | 13 |
| I understand that he's having problems looking for a 2nd or 3rd receiver.
However there's another reason the defense can double team Coates and doesn't
have to worry about other receivers. They can double team Coates because they
know that if someone else is selected as the primary receiver and if that
primary receiver gets open and if Bledsoe throws there, the guy will probably
drop the ball anyway.
Last year they couldn't double team Coates so freely because someone like
Turner might have gotten selected as the primary receiver, gotten open and
caught the ball.
George
|
56.2140 | thanks for making my point | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 04 1995 15:22 | 3 |
|
:^) yeah, someone like Turner :^)
|
56.2141 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Dec 05 1995 08:57 | 88 |
| | > Actually, "Stodgy Bill" took his team to the Super Bowl twice and won with a
| > very conservative offense, that drove his fans nuts sometimes, but it was
| > a conservative offense that out-executed the opposition.
|
| Oh, was Bill GM there, too? NOT! In fact, if I remember correctly,
| most of his "most wanted picks" were overridden by the GM, with
| those new players actually doing MVP work most of the year.
|
| Bill as coach *could* work maybe. Maybe! I'm sick of hearing about
| what he did in NY, though, under very tight restraint. Here, with
| full power to do it his way, he's just going backwards.
Jeez, Sean, read the NOTE before you reply.
Did I say Bill was GM in NY? (Hint: No)
Did I question Bill's abilities as a GM in my note (Hint: Yes)
| > But, in the northeast, in December, you're not really going to see a whole
| > lotta "Air Coryell" getting a lot of success.
|
| No one's asking for that! Trust me, not with Drew's INT rate!
Bledsoe is a helluva lot better than some other young QBs. Would you have
rather had Mirer? Or better yet, Dave Brown?
It's rare that a QB hits the NFL and can read defenses, can not lock onto the
receiver he wants, can see beyond the receivers hand to the DB who'll step
into the gap and make the INT.
I saw Steve Young do a masterful job of faking out the Buffalo defense with
his eyes the other night. He wanted Rice on the right badly, so the entire
time until he threw, he was looking left. That's a learned skill.
| > I've seen it produce two Super Bowl rings.
|
| Yeah, yeah. Chemistry of all the pieces in that puzzle had nothing to
| do with it. It was all Bill.
No one said it was all Bill, but ask any of the players from that time, and
believe me, I've read a lot of their books, and the thing that they credit the
most was Parcells -- Parcells driving them, Parcells motivating them, Parcells
berating them....
| > What has shut that down Coates this year is the lack of other stuff to go to.
|
| So what if there was? Drew doesn't look for the other stuff. He
| follows his primary and maybe 10% of the time looks for a second
| receiver. Simms was no Marino, but he was a hell of a lot smarter
| than Drew.
Yeah, and how much of the Giants did you watch, say, from 79 to 83?
Are you familiar with Phil Simms early career? Phil made some of the dumbest
mistakes I'd seen -- either that or he was injured.
Simms played until he was 38 years old, and his best years were from 5 years
in the league on. It takes a LONG time to learn to be a good QB in the NFL.
IF you have the arm.
I just wish Dave Brown had an arm.
| > What the Pats need is the personnel to make the plan work. Can Bill be trusted
| > to get that personnel? I dunno.
|
| Well he can't. How much more proof is needed?
He can't now. Course, he might learn, he might not. It depends.
I wouldn't write him off just yet. Why do I say that? Because in his first
and third years in New York I was saying the same things that you are now.
The same exact things....
'Saw
|
56.2142 | of course he had some decent teammates.... | LANDO::FARLEY | | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:46 | 11 |
|
Yabbut,
Methinks that it didn't take Broadway Joe too many years to become
a_excellent Q back.
Am I right?
I remain,
maybe doin a bit o' ~/~
;^)
kev
|
56.2143 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:53 | 10 |
| Hey, there ARE guys who step right in and get it done, but not many.
On the whole, especially today I think, you have to plan on a QB taking some
time. IMO, the ideal situation is to plan properly (as best you can of course)
and have your young stud being groomed by your cagey veteran. Don't always
happen that way in this day and age of the salary cap (qv. Dave Brown and Phil
Simms)
'Saw
|
56.2144 | | TWIZZL::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Tue Dec 05 1995 13:12 | 6 |
|
Lets all remember that Steve Young couldn't cut it in Tampa Bay.
How many years was Steve Young in the league before replacing Montana?
I would have to say 5 or 6 years.
Ron
|
56.2145 | After beating Bills in snow at Fenway | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:55 | 9 |
| It took Namath less than one year. He beat the Patriots in the last
game of the 66(?) season to cost them the AFL east championship. Not
that they would have beaten K.C. and advanced to the Superbowl (thanks
Joe).
There was just no stopping him that game, of course that was the
future sb team
|
56.2146 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Dec 05 1995 20:34 | 7 |
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah, but *supposedly* we're paying Drew as the highest
paid QB ever for some reason. If it's to "take as long" as everybody
else to mature, I'm sorry, I don't get it.
Isn't the extra money supposed to result in extra performance?
|
56.2147 | Lighten up Francis | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The Land Of The Stainless Maiden | Wed Dec 06 1995 00:53 | 14 |
| I was there, the only thing you can blame Bledsoe for is trying
to force something that just wasn't there. The defense, if you
can call it that, gave up 3, +60 yard touchdowns! Yeah, let's
give up on Drew you fair-weather fans. I witnesses Ty Law on one
of those T.D.'s jogging across the field to try to cut the guy off,
JOGGING! Then he got popped and everybody cried clip. The D sucked
as a complete unit sunday plain and simple. Martin is one hell of
a rookie huh? If his game faulters next year I can't wait to hear
you guys cut him to pieces!:-)
1 more to got to!
Lil Ed
|
56.2148 | desire problem more than a talent problem | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Dec 06 1995 09:48 | 8 |
| what often happens on those cold December days is one team wants it and
comes on strong physically in the 4th quarter and for the other the
cold and the hitting wear it down and it shows in pursuit and tackling.
I was just surprised that the second team would be the Patriots. That
never happened with Grogan and Nelson and Hannah: They lost for
inexplicable reasons and generally poor coaching but were usually
coming on at the end.
|
56.2149 | Not all of 'em are running a flatline but...... | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Dec 06 1995 11:38 | 7 |
|
But the three you mentioned Bill had more heart than any 10 of these
combined. For some reason I don't see Nellie jogging after anyone.
Jerry
|
56.2150 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 06 1995 12:23 | 15 |
|
The worst part about this Patriots team is that after
last year there were a lot of high hopes around here.
I know I got suckered into it all. Who knew that one
year later we'd be looking at a team that looks like
it needs a major overhaul at least defensively and a heart
transplant? Whereas last year we looked to be a couple
of years from winning the AFC and going to the SB, now
we're back in the pack with a half dozen also-rans with
the same prospects for the future. There's way too much
broke with this defense to fix it in one off-season. And
with Parcells recent record as a GM, I don't think he has
what it takes to get it done anyways. This season is a bust
and if Parcells keeps both jobs next year will be a bust,
too.
|
56.2151 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | A day in infamy | Wed Dec 06 1995 12:30 | 9 |
| > And with Parcells recent record as a GM, I don't think he has
> what it takes to get it done anyways. This season is a bust
> and if Parcells keeps both jobs next year will be a bust, too.
I couldn't agree with you more. That's a shame, too.
I, like many others, was expecting much more this year.
billl
|
56.2152 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Ain't this boogie a mess | Wed Dec 06 1995 12:39 | 5 |
|
From what I seem to remember, the Pats had a major defensive overhaul
this year and that the problem they now face. They let the defense
that kept them in the hunt last year go to the FA market and lost
some key players.
|
56.2153 | Are they really that bad .. | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:39 | 15 |
| Are they really in that much trouble defensivly ? 11 of there 16 games
were vs opponents who will more then likely be in the Playoffs, 5 of
those were vs teams that will win there divisions (KC, BUF(2), SF,
PITT). So this was a tough schedule, they lost some guys (Off/Def) and
then lost there best DB (Released) ? They have the QB, RB, TE and just
need a WR (Also have a K). So there offense is on schedule. The LB's
are great and just need 1 or 2 more Defensive players and there in
there. Give them a year after that to gell and they'll be contenders.
Now what will happen, the $$$ wont be spent we'll lose some names to
free agency and we'll end up never improving and them the Owners
will demand a better stadium and then the team will move in 1998 and
become the West Virina Patriots or something...
mab
|
56.2154 | Time to trade Drew | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass knocks off #1 - again! | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:40 | 7 |
| How much could the Pats get for Bledsoe in a trade? How about to the
Jets for Hugh Douglas, Marvin Jones, a defensive lineman, and a #1
draft choice, which the Pats use to take Keyshawn Johnson from USC.
Wouldn't the Pats be much better if they made that deal?
NAZZ
|
56.2155 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:42 | 9 |
|
Like Ron Borges said in the Globe, the Pats are just a bunch of
players, not a team. Last season, they had a team, a team that needed
help, but a team. They had confidence and chemistry. This season, they've
just got a bunch of players, largely due to Bill Parcells' wreckless
dismantling of the heart and soul of this team (Goad, Turner, Timpson,
Hurst) and the bringing in of overpriced FA mercenaries.
- Sean
|
56.2156 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:47 | 3 |
| It seems they really missed Goad in the middle. Parcells was looking
at contending with the big offensive linemen and gambled with Reggie
White and ended up with a lesser defense than last year.
|
56.2157 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Dec 06 1995 14:05 | 13 |
|
> <<< Note 56.2147 by FABSIX::E_MAXWELL "The Land Of The Stainless Maiden" >>>
>
> I was there, the only thing you can blame Bledsoe for is trying
> to force something that just wasn't there.
The only thing? And you were there?
> can call it that, gave up 3, +60 yard touchdowns! Yeah, let's
> give up on Drew you fair-weather fans.
Give up? First I'd have to start liking him! In New England, the
only thing you can be by definition is a bad-weather fan, btw.
|
56.2158 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 06 1995 15:08 | 17 |
| Everyone seems down on Bledsoe. If Bledsoe is so terrible, why was he in the
pro-bowl last year? Do they make a practice of having bad players in that
game? Much of the season Bledsoe had no time to throw and when he did hit
someone in the numbers they dropped the ball. Is that his fault?
Ok, so he's not that great at hitting a 3rd or 4th target but if he had
some time for plays to develop and if his 1st or 2nd target could hang on to
the ball he wouldn't need to be scrambling around trying to hit the water
boy on a busted play.
The Patriots made steady progress under Parcells before this year and no one
complained. Now they've had one bad year partly due to a tougher schedule and
everyone wants to pull the chain. I say give'em a 2nd chance. If they end up
losing again next year then maybe it's time to start thinking of new coaches
and quarterbacks.
George
|
56.2159 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 06 1995 15:34 | 17 |
|
>> If Bledsoe is so terrible, why was he in the pro-bowl last year?
That's a question a lot of folks were asking last year because
his TD/INT ratio was horrible. The drops have been infuriating this
year but they're fixable and they're not the entire reason why Drew
has the worst completion percentage in the league. The kid just makes
really awful decisions like the game clincher againt NO. There are
no excuses for that play. And it really wasn't atypical of Drew be-
cause he's made bad decisions at critical junctures of games all
season long. And we're not just talking poor throws but fundamental
calls that high school QBs should be know. Right now with his lack
of mobility, his poor decisions and his stretches where he just throws
very poorly, he's a liability but his upside potential is such that
you have to ride it out with him. For now.
|
56.2160 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 06 1995 15:40 | 14 |
| Could be psychological. Considering his age maybe his frustration level is
up and he's showing effects from getting pressured more than he should during
a game. If he had a bit more time to stand in the pocket and if guys would
start catching the ball that could build up his confidence and maybe his
concentration would improve.
And maybe not but it seems a lot of guys are giving up on him without trying
to see what happens if other fixable problems are addressed.
By the way, in spite of the fact that the season is toast there is a possible
silver lining. If the Patriots beat the Jets they will be 4-0 against New York
teams this year. At least that would be something.
George
|
56.2161 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | A day in infamy | Wed Dec 06 1995 17:31 | 15 |
| The thing that has bothered me about Bledsoe from day
one is his EXTREME lack of mobility. This guy makes
'Saw seem fleet-of-foot.
How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
down on a 3rd and less than one? I mean it doesn't
take a rocket sceintist to figure out that if you
follow the center and DRIVE your freakin' legs you
will 'almost' always get a yard. Bledsoe has yet to
be able to pull off this highly technical manuver.
billl
|
56.2162 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 07 1995 08:08 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2161 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "A day in infamy" >>>
> How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
> down on a 3rd and less than one?
1). If the coach doesn't call that play
2). If the Center gets driven backwards by the defense.
There are a couple, take your pick.
Why didn't many people notice how wanting Bledsoe and Parcells were last year
during the 7 game winning streak when they ran the table to take the 2nd wild
card spot in the playoffs?
Who picks the guys for the pro-bowl anyway and why are they so much more
stupid than the guys who write in this file?
George
|
56.2163 | 2 sense worth | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:11 | 13 |
|
I don't think Bledsoe is an athlete in the true sense. He's a young
man who can throw a football a zillion miles an hour. He'll never be
able to run like a Grogan. No one on this planet ever made more stupid
decisions than Grogan. He was God awful in plenty of games.
Lack of mobility is a trait of most Q.B.'s with the exception of the
Young's and Mirer's, but most like Marino have the knack of avoiding the
rush or getting rid of the ball. Remember towards the end of last year
Bledsoe was at least dumping the ball, this year for some reason his
confidence is really shot (maybe getting blind-sided helps)
I think with a good team this kid would really shine, still make
mistakes but still make great throws. The team is lousy in so many
areas that one individual can't shine.
|
56.2164 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:35 | 16 |
| > How does a 6'5" (I think) quarterback not made a first
> down on a 3rd and less than one?
>> 1). If the coach doesn't call that play
>> 2). If the Center gets driven backwards by the defense.
>> There are a couple, take your pick.
Have you seen Bledsoe try to run the QB sneak? I take it by
your reply that you haven't because he runs it like monkeys
play the piano. No one wants or expects Bledsoe to be the
second coming of Bobby Douglas but you'd really like to think
that under extreme circumstances he could tuck it and run. He
can't.
|
56.2165 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 07 1995 10:06 | 9 |
| And when he does run does he look like the afore mentioned musical primate as
he tries to run through large gaping holes opened by the offensive line or is
he trying to claw his way through the defense while being careful not to step
on his own guys who are flat on their back?
I agree this guy is not the 2nd coming but for a young guy he's had some
success when surrounded by a better team (or at least a team playing better).
George
|
56.2166 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 07 1995 10:43 | 15 |
| >> And when he does run does he look like the afore mentioned musical
>> primate as he tries to run through large gaping holes opened by the
>> offensive line or is he trying to claw his way through the defense
>> while being careful not to step on his own guys who are flat on their
>> back?
Haven't been watching very many games, have you? It's obvious that
you haven't or you would have known that Bledsoe was a Pro Bowler
last year. There aren't any 'large gaping holes' on the QB sneak.
Drew Bledsoe's own unique interpretation of the QB sneak is to turn
his right shoulder away from the defense, tuck his head and make little
tiny baby steps that might actually move a sheet hanging out on the
line to dry if the wind was right but it is pathetically ineffective
against your average defender.
|
56.2167 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 07 1995 11:28 | 12 |
| The offensive line can make a QB sneak work by pushing the defense back or
by knocking them down so the QB can dive over the top. If they get pushed
back by the defense it doesn't matter much what type of steps the QB makes,
he's probably not going to get very far.
If this is something he needs to learn here he can probably pick that up in
time. Maybe they would rather have him concentrate on other problem areas
rather than working on running in a crowd right now. In any case saying he
can't push the defensive line back when his offensive line has already failed
at that doesn't make him a poor quarterback.
George
|
56.2168 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Dec 07 1995 11:36 | 2 |
|
no it doesn't but his mind does.......
|
56.2169 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 07 1995 11:51 | 12 |
|
>> In any case saying he can't push the defensive line back when his
>> offensive line has already failed at that doesn't make him a poor
>> quarterback.
Who said all that? I don't expect him to push an entire d-line back
by himself. It'd be nice if he could feel the soft spot in the def-
ense and push just enough to get the first down yardage though. Un-
fortunately his execution is just awful and gives him/us no chance.
You'd agree if you ever saw him attempt it. It's ugly but it's just
another one of those little things that should be intuitive that he
just doesn't do well and might not ever.
|
56.2170 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Dec 08 1995 13:27 | 7 |
| Ok here we go, a win against the Jets and the Pats go 4-0 for the season
against New York teams.
Looks like we'll get to see what these teams are made of. The forecast is
for extremely cold weather.
George
|
56.2171 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:04 | 12 |
| GERAT FOOTBALL WEEKEND... Get Baltimore at Minny on saturday (12:30)
and then Arz at SD at 4 on saturday... Then 3 more games on sunday !!
The Question is will the Pats be the only game on at 1 on sunday ?
Dallas AT Philly is listed as a 1PM Start time ? Pittsburg @Oakland
for the 4pm game... And a GREAT MNF Game...
As a PATS fan I don't want to role over and call them dead until the
heart has stopped pumping but I think Oak, Indy and Miami will be the
WC teams (I could live without Miami but Hope INDY makes it).
GO PATS :-) (Ya just never know)
mab
|
56.2172 | you call 20 cold? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:49 | 5 |
| okay I'll bite, what do you call extremely cold weather, George? I say
single digits and under, straight farenheit with wind as a second
number - none of this wind chill baloney.
After last week I don't think this is a cold weather Pats team.
|
56.2173 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Dec 08 1995 15:31 | 12 |
| Well I guess cold is relative. People who work with liquid Hydrogen think
liquid Nitrogen is life in the tropics.
Yeah, wind chill is real. If it's 20 with a 25 mph wind and a wind chill down
around zero that should feel a whole lot like playing at zero degrees. And
after the snow that's suppose to come tomorrow slipping on 20 degrees ice
shouldn't be a whole lot different than slipping on 0 degrees ice.
Forecast is for cold, about as cold as football gets with a few notable
exceptions.
George
|
56.2174 | JMHO | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Fri Dec 08 1995 15:51 | 12 |
|
Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong. You will
never ever get it going straight over the center. Which is what Drew
does every time the play is called. You have to slide inbetween one
of the gaurds. Havin a big ole NT push the center back is actually
not that bad on sneak. Usually if that happens the QB slides right
by him for the 1ft he needs for the 1st down. Drew OTOH gets T-Rex
arms and goes right over the center for a loss of 1.
Jerry
|
56.2175 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Dec 08 1995 16:07 | 13 |
| RE<<< Note 56.2174 by AD::HEATH "The albatross and whales they are my brother" >>>
> Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
> watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong. You will
> never ever get it going straight over the center.
Joke, right?
If my view of a sneak is the mistaken way the Patriots run it, how does that
prove that I don't watch them play? More likely that proves that I am watching
them play instead of watching someone who runs the play correctly.
George
|
56.2176 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 11 1995 10:48 | 37 |
|
>> If my view of a sneak is the mistaken way the Patriots run it,
Judging by the questions you ask, you don't really have a view.
I'd guess by your responses that you really haven't seen Drew
try and run the sneak. Have you?
In other news...
Drew was 11 for 36 yesterday. Dropped passes were a small
part of the problem but has anyone out there ever seen a
QB that had as many of his passes tipped as Bledsoe does?
He has to avergae close to five a game and it's probably
a function of him telegraphing where he's going to throw.
Yet another thing to work on.
Curtis Martin continues to be the biggest and often the only
reason to watch this team. If the Patsies can get some speed
at WR next year we'll have the makings of a very nice offense
because Martin is a keeper.
Burned by the big play yet again yesterday. Is Al Groh's system
so complex that these guys just can't figure out their assignments
on a given play or are they just inept? Take away the exceptional
special teams play by Meggett and the one play by Brown and we
lose this game.
We need real help on the d-line. Even against an o-line as inept
as the Jets' we had to bring numbers to get to Boomer. Willie
McGinest is a bust. He'll shine against a non-blocking tight
end but just about any offensive lineman in the league could
handle him one-on-one making Chris Slade a marked man. The
Pats need wide receiver help number one and d-line help number
two and not in the form of the wrong Reggie White or William
Roberts this time.
|
56.2177 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Mon Dec 11 1995 10:59 | 4 |
|
He gets passes knocked down because of that Bernie Kosar side arm
throwing motion.
|
56.2178 | | WRKSYS::KNIKER | Hay saved and Cork beat | Mon Dec 11 1995 11:13 | 15 |
| RE: knocked-down passes
I think the reason for the alarming number of knocked down passes is more the
former (telegraphed passes, .2175) than the latter (throwing motion, .2176). The
first personnel priority for this team should not be a wide receiver or
defensive lineman. It should be someone who can teach Bledsoe how to look off
his receivers before throwing to them.
He never seems to look for the second (or third option). If his primary receiver
is covered, he either a) throws into the coverage anyway or b) throws the ball
away (i.e. rarely looks for another alternative). A good example was when he
threw the ball away on a covered screen to MArtin (or was it Meggett) while not
even bothering to look at a WIDE OPEN Ben Coates 15 yards down the middle.
Chris
|
56.2179 | 2 sense worth | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:06 | 8 |
|
It could also be the O'line not doing their jobs. If they give up
penetration it's fairly easy for a lineman , 6'2 to 6'5 tall to
knock down a pass. The D' ends should cut down on some plays.
You can't pinpoint one or two problems on this team. It's a whole
lotta problems that's the cauuse of their demise as well as a tougher
schedule.
|
56.2180 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:26 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2176 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> Judging by the questions you ask, you don't really have a view.
> I'd guess by your responses that you really haven't seen Drew
> try and run the sneak. Have you?
Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this is the new way
we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).
RE The game
That was one ugly game. Both sides tried hard to lose but the Jets got an
antimatter, Shafer stroke victory and came up with the loss.
In a year with not much to cheer about the Patriots are 4-0 against New
York teams and 5-2 in their division. Of course their record out of New York
and out of the division is better thought of as room for improvement next
year.
George
|
56.2181 | Six players short of a title - five on defense | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass knocks off #1 - again! | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:10 | 10 |
| Defense needs a complete revamping. I would keep the linebackers
(despite a horrible year from Chris Slade) and the cornerbacks, and
jettison the rest of the starters. I might keep Ferric Collons and
Troy Barnett, as they are good backups. As are Whigham and Lewis in
the backfield.
But the Pats need a dominating noseguard, two defensive ends, and two
safeties. Not to mention a big-play wide receiver.
NAZZ
|
56.2182 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:17 | 7 |
|
>> Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this
>> is the new way we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).
And this must be the new SPORTS notesfile way of saying, "No, I
haven't actually seen him attempt it."
|
56.2183 | These two have been bugging me | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:40 | 14 |
| <<< Note 56.2180 by SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
> Clearly you are not watching any of the games (I guess this is the new way
>we say "I disagree" in the SPORTS notes file. Weird).
Hey, at least it's better than the Digital way of saying "I disagree".
I don't know how many times I've heard someone respond with "I don't
disagree with your statement, but .....". Then they go on to disagree.
And people are still saying "so and so got TFSO'd" instead of saying
the truth, which is "so and so got laid off".
Kevin
|
56.2184 | Change in scheme needed | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:47 | 10 |
| Maybe what the Pats need is to change to a 4-3 defense. More and more
teams are going to the 4-3 because of the lack of pass rushers. More
and more offenses now use the short passing game which require QB's to
only drop back 5 steps instead of seven which means less time for
someone to come from the outside. So if you put 2 300lb tackles
pushing up the middle instead of one 300lb noseman you should get to the
QB a little quicker or at least get into his face. I think today more
and more colleges are going away from the 3-4 to a 4 man line. JMHO
Mike
|
56.2185 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:42 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2182 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> And this must be the new SPORTS notesfile way of saying, "No, I
> haven't actually seen him attempt it."
You must never enter any notes because I did see him try it.
George
|
56.2186 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 12 1995 15:47 | 8 |
|
>> because I did see him try it.
Then why did you ask what the game situations were? Or say that
*maybe* it's something he needs to work on? *If* you'd actually
seen him attempt it you'd know what the game situations were and
that it's just something he does poorly and needs to work on.
|
56.2187 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 15:58 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2186 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> Then why did you ask what the game situations were? Or say that
> *maybe* it's something he needs to work on? *If* you'd actually
> seen him attempt it you'd know what the game situations were and
> that it's just something he does poorly and needs to work on.
You must never log in to your computer account because I don't recall asking
what the game situation was.
Obviously you try a sneak on short yardage. Not exactly the play to run
on 3rd and long. And I believe I said that the reason they might not work
on it is that they feel other things are more important.
George
|
56.2188 | Bill's already given up on qb sneaks it seems | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:09 | 7 |
| Well they seem to have given up on it. They had 3rd and inches and
took a delay of game and punted. That was from the 45. Strategy
worked pretty well, ironic given the Switzer scenario. Bill had 8
minutes or so so not exactly a pure comparison.
I think Parcells had no confidence in a sneak.
|
56.2189 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:17 | 9 |
|
>> You must never log in to your computer account because I
>> don't recall asking what the game situation was.
In .2165 you ask what the blocking looked like. 'Are there
huge gaping holes etc. etc.?' On a QB sneak? The Patriots?
Not likely. And not a question that I'd expect from someone
that has seen him attempt it.
|
56.2190 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:32 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2189 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> In .2165 you ask what the blocking looked like. 'Are there
> huge gaping holes etc. etc.?' On a QB sneak? The Patriots?
> Not likely. And not a question that I'd expect from someone
> that has seen him attempt it.
You must never drive your car to work.
Regardless of how you run the sneak, if their line is pushing your line
back even if you get through the "soft" spot you end up getting crunched
before you get back to the line of scrimmage.
No running game works with any consistency with the offensive line going
backwards and defenders are in the offensive backfield regardless if it's a
sneak, a regular run, or some sort of draw or reverse.
George
|
56.2191 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:28 | 17 |
|
>> No running game works with any consistency with the offensive
>> line going backwards and defenders are in the offensive backfield
Uh, George? The Pats have a back on the verge of breaking the team
rushing record but you knew that because you're a big Pats fan. His
name is Curtis Martin, btw. The problem isn't/wasn't the line. That's
just another excuse. The problem is Drew's execution. He's never going
to get it done with his head tucked down as if he believes that what he
can't see can't hurt him. He's goes about it far too timidly. The bad
throwing year I think you can pass off as a bad year and poor receiving
talent. It's the big mental lapses and the seeming lack of heart as ev-
idenced by the way he runs the ball that worry me. He's in the NFL and
a monster arm isn't enough to get it done anymore. He has to bring more
to the table than that and right now he doesn't seem like he's able.
|
56.2192 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:42 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2191 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
At the risk of using the old terminology I'll just say I disagree.
If there is one thing different about the NFL it is that Quarter Backs who
run don't have very long careers. If he can't run so what, don't call that
play.
Remember how McMann was once the best Quarterback in the league? When he was
health and running the Bears couldn't lose. When he went down with injuries
they became just another good team.
Greg Landry was an incredible quarterback at UMASS and running was a big part
of his game but when he got to Detroit he quickly learned that when QB's run in
the NFL as Frank Gifford would say "the defense sends someone out to separate
the helmet from the shoulders".
Sure it would be nice if he could run the sneak and some day maybe he will
learn that but there are more important things for him to learn right now like
keeping his head in the game when things are going to hell and not losing his
confidence when receivers start dropping the ball.
He showed last year that he had potential, I think this year is the exception
and it's mostly mental. He'll be back.
George
|
56.2193 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:58 | 19 |
|
>> If there is one thing different about the NFL it is that Quarter
>> Backs who run don't have very long careers.
Steve Young, Joe Montana, Roger Staubach, Terry Bradshaw even Jim
Kelly and Warren Moon can tuck it under and run if they have to.
And it's really not even a matter of being able to run per se.
It's having the smarts and/or instinct to find where the defense is
vulnerable and the courage and strength to cram your way in their
and get the necessary yardage. He doesn't do that right now. Plays
that should have been automatic were drive killers.
>> Remember how McMann was once the best Quarterback in the league?
It's McMahon and I think you and Jim are the only ones who remember
him being the best QB in the league. Jim was always "adequate" never
the best in the league. Chicago's strength was its defense and its
running game.
|
56.2194 | not to speak of Grogan | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:08 | 12 |
| One thing about Bledsoe even in the pure quarterbacking sense is his
touch on the long pass. This was a given when he was drafted and from
the little I saw of him in college seemed to be one of his strong
points. But game to game he's showing an inability to connect on the
long pass. In fact does anyone recall any long bombs from him this
year?
Basically I'm talking about the kind of pass with a length of 40-45+
and has some kind of arc. Almost every quarterback who could be
considered "great" was able to lay it in long: two of the best were
Jurgenson and Unitas. In fact Bradshaw of the Steelers possessed this
talent to a high degree.
|
56.2195 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:46 | 7 |
|
Jim McMahon didn't get injured from running with the ball. One
of the DL's from Green Bay. Picked him up and slammed down on his
shoulder. Well after the play was over. There was a flag and the player
was fined. McMahon was never the same afterwards.
Ron
|
56.2196 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 13 1995 15:19 | 27 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2193 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> It's McMahon and I think you and Jim are the only ones who remember
> him being the best QB in the league. Jim was always "adequate" never
> the best in the league. Chicago's strength was its defense and its
> running game.
Back around '85 when McMahon played the Bears were unbeatable. When he
didn't play they were still a really good team but no longer in a league
by themselves.
RE <<< Note 56.2194 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> One thing about Bledsoe even in the pure quarterbacking sense is his
> touch on the long pass. This was a given when he was drafted and from
> the little I saw of him in college seemed to be one of his strong
> points. But game to game he's showing an inability to connect on the
> long pass. In fact does anyone recall any long bombs from him this
> year?
This could be due to lack of confidence. It would also have to do with not
having much time to stand around in the pocket letting long pass patterns
develop.
Both problems can be fixed.
George
|
56.2197 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 13 1995 16:08 | 14 |
|
>> Back around '85 when McMahon played the Bears were unbeatable.
>> When he didn't play they were still a really good team but no
>> longer in a league by themselves.
By that logic Bob Griese was the best QB in the league the year
the Dolphins went undefeated. We all know that he wasn't. The
Dolphins were great for the same reason the Bears were great
- a great defense and a great running game. The decline of
the Bears was due more to the departure of Buddy Ryan and Wilbur
Marshall than any injury to McMahon. McMahon's been to a few places
since he left the Bears and never came close to duplicating the
success that he had with the Bears.
|
56.2198 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 13 1995 16:41 | 10 |
| As someone said, since his injury he hasn't been the same.
But when he was with the Bears he was great. He not only threw, he ran. And
by that I mean he really ran, like a running back, not like most of the Quarter
Backs today who slide at the 1st sign of danger.
And the glasses. No one argued with Ditka or wore sun glasses like he did.
For a brief time, he was the greatest,
George
|
56.2199 | Certainly no argument from me! | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Thu Dec 14 1995 09:44 | 5 |
|
> And the glasses. No one argued with Ditka or wore sun glasses like he did.
...and there you have it...
|
56.2200 | Pats Snarf | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Dec 14 1995 10:30 | 1 |
56.2201 | Grogan>Bradshaw | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Dec 14 1995 10:33 | 5 |
| > Dolphins were great for the same reason the Bears were great
> - a great defense and a great running game. The decline of
And you could have added Bradshaw and the Steelers.
|
56.2202 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 14 1995 10:57 | 24 |
| So if McMahon wasn't that good a Quarter Back why were the Bears so much
better with him than they were without him? From what I saw he looked pretty
good. He threw very well, he ran like a real running back, he was a really good
team leader, he knew when to listen to Ditka and when not to take his Krap,
and the offense really clicked when he was playing.
And if you'll remember the Superbowl wasn't exactly a 10-0 game, the Bears
scored a ton of points so it wasn't all defense.
Meanwhile back to the Patriots. They need two wins to end up .500 and this
one looks really tough. I'm not sure I agree that the Steelers are a lock for
the Superbowl like they think over in the Steelers note but they are a good
team. It would be a big confidence boost if the Pats could win.
On TV this morning they were interviewing Bledsoe and Parcells and asking
them if they were aware if the Patriots were still mathematically alive.
Bledsoe seemed to hum and haw through an answer and Parcells said he had
someone else looking into those types of things.
If the Pats are still alive I think you'd need differential equations or
maybe even general relativity to ferret out their chances but it would be nice
to see them make a run at .500. It's a long shot but they can do it.
George
|
56.2203 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Dec 14 1995 11:02 | 10 |
| The simplest generalization for playoffs is record vs opposite
conference. The Pats have a chance for the same reason that Carolina
doesn't - losses (victories) against the other conference.
Last year they swept the central and would have been in poor shape on
tie breakers.
Head to head becomes a problem and precludes conference but it seems
having a bunch of teams at 8-8 would make conf record the tiebreaker
and The pats should max that out since they were swept by the nfc-west.
|
56.2204 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 14 1995 11:08 | 15 |
|
>> So if McMahon wasn't that good a Quarter Back why were the
>> Bears so much better with him than they were without him?
Like I said before the Bears dynasty that never was faltered
because Buddy Ryan started reading his press clippings and
Wilbur Marshall wanted out. McMahon was a gutsy QB but he had
a below average arm (he was prone to throwing some real wounded
ducks). He was good in much the same way that Phil Simms was
good. Simms took the Giants all the way with only two losses all
season but no one would proclaim him the greatest though Simms
was a much much better thrower than McMahon. Back then Montana,
Marino and even Elway were all in their prime and were all better
than McMahon as were a few other QBs.
|
56.2205 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 18 1995 09:04 | 9 |
| Ouch that hurt. The Pats came soooooooo close. All tied up with one of the
best teams in the conference right down near the end and thunk, the wheels fall
off. What a bumer.
But in the sliver lining department the Pats did beat the division champs
both times out. Who knows, maybe it will work out that they beat the AFC champs
both times out, the Bills seem to be on a roll.
George
|
56.2206 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Mon Dec 18 1995 09:05 | 4 |
56.2207 | Anybody got the seven | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Dec 18 1995 09:26 | 6 |
| Well Parcells said 38 played great and 7 should have stayed home.
We have Yancy obviously, who are the other 6? Guyton?
Tackling and pursuit are two problem areas. That usually translates
into hustle.
|
56.2208 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Mon Dec 18 1995 09:41 | 14 |
| > Well Parcells said 38 played great and 7 should have stayed home.
Probably the 7 ex-Giants (could there be that few? :-)
Definitely a frustrating team to root for and watch. They're still a wide
receiver and about 3 defensive players (pass rushing lineman, linebacker for
depth, good cover corner) short.
Best thing for the Pats would be if Parcells stayed to coach, but gave up
the GM role. The only pick that's really panned out in my mind is Martin.
I know I haven't been watching them a lot, but where is Jimmy Hitchcock? I
would think that this past game and next week, he and Law would be out there
for every defensive play.
|
56.2209 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 18 1995 10:09 | 17 |
|
>> Who knows, maybe it will work out that they beat the AFC champs
>> both times out, the Bills seem to be on a roll.
I don't know a single Patriots fan who gives a um... crap about
beating Buffalo twice. It'd mean something if we were going to the
playoffs and it gave us home field advantage but since we'll be
watching on tv - big damn deal. If you're a Patriots fan the real
silver lining is in the form of Coates, Bledsoe and Martin - the
young core of a potentially great offense. As disappointing as
this season was we still have these three and a decent offensive
line. If we can a get a decent deep threat and some secondary
guys who don't tackle like showgirls then we can make a move as
early as next year because we do have Coates, Beldose and Martin.
If Parcells is still enthralled with Giants players then get us
Phillippi (sp) Sparks and get rid of Terry Ray and Carlos Yancy.
|
56.2210 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:20 | 2 |
56.2211 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:22 | 7 |
|
re -.1
Tommy....I'm tickled pink about beating Baffalo twice.
Jerry
|
56.2212 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:28 | 14 |
|
>> Tommy....I'm tickled pink about beating Baffalo twice.
Really? I just don't get worked up about Buffalo. I'd
much rather have beaten the Dolphins twice. When the
Pats stunk and guys like George couldn't be bothered
with them there used to be as many Bills fans as Pats
fans in the stands when the Bills came to Foxboro. They
were enthusiastic though not abrasive. I actually felt
sorry for them for getting crushed in all of those Super
Bowls. The Dolphins are another story. I'd much rather have
beaten *them* twice this year. They've always seemed to
be a thorn in our side.
|
56.2213 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:35 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2212 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
>When the
> Pats stunk and guys like George couldn't be bothered
> with them there used to be as many Bills fans as Pats
> fans in the stands when the Bills came to Foxboro.
The Pats did stink this year and that doesn't bother me a bit. What bothered
me was their habit of doing things like assaulting women in their locker room
and their existing fans reaction which was mocking that same woman with
inflatable dolls. Let me guess, you are one of the ones who was proud to call
yourself a fan back in those days, right? After all abuse is right up your
ally.
>The Dolphins are another story. I'd much rather have
> beaten *them* twice this year. They've always seemed to
> be a thorn in our side.
We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
share of wins against the Dolphins. I'd say it was more the other way around
in that the Dolphins were more often the contender being spoiled by the Pats.
George
|
56.2214 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Dec 18 1995 12:47 | 23 |
|
>> The Pats did stink this year and that doesn't bother me a bit.
They didn't stink this year. They lost games that they should
have won. The Jets - they stink. The Pats just don't have a killer
instinct. If they stunk you'd not be a Pats fan.
>> What bothered me was their habit of doing things like assaulting women
>> in their locker room
It was one incident. If one incident can be a "habit" then I guess
someone who can't name the Pats offensive and defensive coordinators
can be a "fan".
>> We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
>> share of wins against the Dolphins.
I don't have to look it up. I have their entire '85 run to the SB on
tape including the Matt Millen/Pat Sullivan incident. When the Pats
went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first
time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
for all of three years, is far too small.
|
56.2215 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 18 1995 13:00 | 38 |
| Re <<< Note 56.2214 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> It was one incident. If one incident can be a "habit"
Well, put that one up there along with their GM getting into a brawl with a
Raiders line backer and a few questionable employment practices and things
start adding up.
But the thing that made it more of an incident was their owner badmouthing
the woman who made the complaint in terms suggesting she deserved what she
got and the fans reaction with the inflatable dolls. Did I want to be any
part of that? No. By the way you still haven't answered my question, did you
think of that as a proud moment?
Honestly, were you one of the ones in the crowd cheering Victor Kiam when he
made his anti Lisa Olson speeches or were you one of the few booing the clowns
with the inflatable Lisa Olson dolls?
>then I guess
> someone who can't name the Pats offensive and defensive coordinators
> can be a "fan".
How does knowing the coaching staff make your zeal excessive and irrational?
In fact you seemed to have ducked all those questions I asked about excessive
and irrational behavior. No doubt because you know it completely destroys your
argument. Oops, look out, we're about due for the smoke screen about how I'm
just looking for attention calling you on that point.
>When the Pats
> went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first
> time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
> for all of three years, is far too small.
But then the snow plow incident was more of a thorn in the Dalphin's side
than the Patriots side. Maybe we should start looking at your frame of
reference.
George
|
56.2216 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 18 1995 13:50 | 13 |
|
Parcells, what a class act. Moaning about 7 who should have stayed
home and younger guys who "didn't hear the bell."
Bill, how about your overpaid underachieving hand-picked veterans
not hearing the bell ALL year?
This guy bugs me royal, if couldn't tell. :^) Scapegoating Yancy,
thrown into a defense at the last minute to save the season.
Has Bill *ever* had a bad thing to say about one of his precious
pet players? He's always in CYA mode.
- Sean
|
56.2217 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 21 1995 10:37 | 13 |
| Well Saturday night is the last chance for the Pats to have any impact on
this season. They are out of the race and can no longer get into the playoffs
but they can play the part of spoiler to a certain extent.
It appears that the Colts might even be able to make the playoffs if they
lose but their odds are better if they beat the Pats.
For the Patriots they are now 5-2 in their division. A win would make them
6-2 in division play. Last year they feasted on the NFC teams they played, this
year their interconference games were a disaster.
GO PATS, FINISH WITH A WIN!!!
George
|
56.2218 | :^) grumpy reply follows | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Thu Dec 21 1995 11:11 | 3 |
|
Spoiler, schmoiler. The last vestige of a loser.
|
56.2219 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Dec 21 1995 11:41 | 23 |
| >
> Told myself I wouldn't do this but......George you could not have
> watched many Pats games 'cause you got the sneak all wrong. You will
> never ever get it going straight over the center. Which is what Drew
> does every time the play is called. You have to slide inbetween one
> of the gaurds. Havin a big ole NT push the center back is actually
> not that bad on sneak. Usually if that happens the QB slides right
> by him for the 1ft he needs for the 1st down. Drew OTOH gets T-Rex
> arms and goes right over the center for a loss of 1.
>
> Jerry
BEST sneak I've seen since Starr decided to hang onto the ball and NOT give it
to Mercein, was the one Steve Young and the AWESOME San Fran O-line ran the
other night against Minny.
The line must've pushed the Minny d-line back about three yards and Young kind
of "snuck" standing up. It looked for all the world like the ultimate rugby
ruck.....
'Saw
|
56.2220 | THE sneak | NQOS01::swu0r1.tfo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Thu Dec 21 1995 13:45 | 1 |
| still not in the same league as Namath's
|
56.2221 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Dec 21 1995 13:45 | 5 |
| > It appears that the Colts might even be able to make the playoffs if they
>lose but their odds are better if they beat the Pats.
Yeah, the Colts' odds of getting in are pretty good if they win, since
they are guaranteed of getting in with a win.
|
56.2222 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Thu Dec 21 1995 13:56 | 13 |
| The Colts make the playoffs if they win, and they are favored by 6,
last I saw.
The Colts are eliminated if they lose and Seattle wins (unlikely,
as Chiefs are favored by 7 at home against the Seahawks).
If the Colts and Seattle both lose, the Colts will make the playoffs
if San Diego, Oakland, or Miami loses (1 of the three). With Hostetler
out for Oakland, I'd bet on the Broncos to win. If the Colts and
Seattle both lose, and San Diego, Miami, and Oakland all win, the Colts
are eliminated.
|
56.2223 | That old Eli man | AKOCOA::BREEN | Oh, Come Ollie Matson | Thu Dec 21 1995 14:02 | 5 |
| Don't go knocking Chuck Mercein who rose to the occasion on that day
that had straight fahrenheit numbers and didn't need any faux windchill
baby numbers to prove to the world that it was cold, damn cold.
Mercein caught and ran the ball as the mainstay of that last drive.
|
56.2224 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Dec 21 1995 15:52 | 9 |
| > Don't go knocking Chuck Mercein who rose to the occasion on that day
> that had straight fahrenheit numbers and didn't need any faux windchill
> baby numbers to prove to the world that it was cold, damn cold.
> Mercein caught and ran the ball as the mainstay of that last drive.
Wasn't it Donny Anderson who tried (3 times) to push it over from the
one and was rejected each time (before "The Sneak") ?
|
56.2225 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Oh, Come Ollie Matson | Thu Dec 21 1995 16:04 | 6 |
| That could be, Donny was the big star but when the Pack fell behind and
needed the big drive they relied on Mercein. Donny was an okay pro but
not up to his college hype. Where'd he come from Purdue?,Kansas?SMU?
Who was on the Dallas line trying to stop'em: Lilly, Pugh, that mlb
from Alabama
|
56.2226 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 21 1995 16:09 | 4 |
|
billthe, my erudite friend, I'm sure you can loop this around
and tie it to the Patriots so as to make this string relevant to
the title of the basenote.
|
56.2227 | And ;that's how we got here from there | AKOCOA::BREEN | Oh, Come Ollie Matson | Thu Dec 21 1995 16:45 | 16 |
| Tommy 56.2219 discussed great sneaks contrasting our beloved Drew's
nearly universally acknoweldged inability to do same with Bart Starr's
in 1965 (or was it '66). Chuck Mercein was on the Pack (and from New
England - Yale).
I'm hardly erudite btw - I've never read Ulysses nor even Camus'
Rememberance of Things Past. I've got the Sound and the Fury in the
downstairs bathroom and promise to try the first dozen or so pages
again - the name caddy and the caddies of the nearby golfers confused
me not to speak of the several passages in time the author goes thru.
But Pylon turned out worth the effort so I'll probably perservere
here. Got that Hans Herlin book for you to swap for a Davies - coming
to the pool-95 banquet?
|
56.2228 | Parole Tide! | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Dec 21 1995 17:26 | 17 |
|
Re. MLB for the Cowboys
That would be Leroy Jordan.
Ole Bear Bryant had a good story about Leroy. Leroy's freshman
year at Bama, the good Coach Bryant greeted all of his players
on the first day of practice (100+ players). He told his boys
to look down to the other end of the field where there were 10
footballs laying on the grass. He told them to go get him a
football (obviously some sort of toughness test). Ole Leroy
brought him two.......
You'll have to imagine BB telling this story in his colorful
style and gravelly voice. Classic.
Claybone
|
56.2229 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 26 1995 10:56 | 14 |
|
>> We might want to look this one up. Seems the Pats have always had their
>> share of wins against the Dolphins.
> I don't have to look it up. I have their entire '85 run to the SB on
> tape including the Matt Millen/Pat Sullivan incident. When the Pats
> went down to the Orange Bowl to beat Miami that year it was the first
> time in about 19 tries down there. Your frame of reference, as a "fan"
> for all of three years, is far too small.
I watched a little of the AFC championship game against Miami this
weekend and I stand corrected. It wasn't 19 straight road losses to
the Dolphins. It was *only* 18 straight road losses.
|
56.2230 | Guess I got jump on the Squeelers 'wagon | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Dec 26 1995 11:56 | 12 |
|
Was it me or did Drew look like he just wanted to get outa there
Saturday? That game was VERY winnable down to the last 2 minutes
but Drew seemed to play like..."Well let me chuck this down field
into double coverage a couple times so I can get back to Wala Wala"
Once you can forgive but twice in the last two minutes. Come on in
Drew's last three possesions of 1995 he had a fumble and two int's.
I don't want to go and lable the the guy no heart/gutless whatever
but that game was well within reach a number of times.
Jerry
|
56.2231 | limited field of jumping | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:00 | 10 |
| Wail,
It looks like thised week's bandwagon jumpin is gonna be a lot easier. I
mean, hail, they's only 8 teams playing.
Right now, from where I'm sitting, it looks like Detroit, San Diego,
Buffalo or Miami and possibly Green Bay, although I haven't counted out
some of them others....
TTom
|
56.2232 | Gotta go with a squad that won 7 in a row and beat the 'Niners... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:08 | 3 |
| I'm suddenly finding a liking to the Honolulu Blue that the Lions wear - and
feeling superior to the other Lion bandwagon-jumpers for knowing that it's
Honolulu Blue... :-) :-)
|
56.2233 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:11 | 18 |
|
Drew showed me a little something when he took that hit
right on the chinstrap and got up like it wasn't anything.
Still how do you have Ben Coates and Curtis Martin fully
involved in the offense and still not be able to score?
Answer - Graham, Brisby and Lee still dropping passes
and still unable to get any yardage after the catch and
Bledsoe still making questionable decisions. I saw in the
paper where Big Tuna acknowledged that we need d-line and
wide receiver help. He also ought to acknowledge that the
guys we had at those spots last year were better than
this bunch. I'd like to think that the guys Tuna shed last
year and the one year contract signings have us well poised
salary capwise and that we're going to make a move but after
spending 3 mil for a return man and 1 mil each for career
backup d-linemen, I'm a little afraid to think of what he might
bring home this time. Phillippi Sparks would be nice.
|
56.2234 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:11 | 6 |
|
My sis sent me a Packer hat for Christmas. Guess I'll be
rootin' for the Pack.......even though they got a_ex Auburn
boy for a QB.
Claybone
|
56.2235 | Or something like that | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:26 | 6 |
| re: a_ex Auburn boy for a QB
I thought Favre was from one of them smallish louisiana schools like
Northwestern Southeast Central Louisiana Tech State Institute.
TTom
|
56.2237 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:29 | 2 |
| Favre is from Southern Mississippi, and *still* can't pronounce his own
name correctly...
|
56.2238 | RE: .2234-.2237 - look at those timestamps... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:44 | 2 |
|
Who knew Brett Favre would be such a hot topic amongst Pats fans?
|
56.2240 | swoonin | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Dec 26 1995 12:55 | 4 |
| Karen's just trying to latch on to something since she lost her lead in
da POOL ;-).
TTom
|
56.2242 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:02 | 3 |
| > I've got 12 wins thised week so I may have it back...
Well, there's your pick-up line for Brett right there...
|
56.2243 | favreite | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:09 | 3 |
| Are you glad to see me or is that 12 picks in your pool...
TTom
|
56.2244 | They'll be 11-5 and back in the 'offs next year | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:16 | 25 |
|
re.. <<< Note 56.2233 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
Thats why I didn't want to call him heartless. There is no doubt
that he is a tough kid but it seemed to me he felt it was useless being
out there and just wanted it over. Yea Big Tuna all but said he dorked
things up with he FA signings last year, hopefully he'll get some
talent evaluation help and put together a solid team for next year. He
is a good coach but nobody can do both jobs effectively. It was good
to see Harlow back at RT. I think he is much better than Lane but
ended up in Tuna's doghouse somehow. Lane is better than Kratch so
maybe move Lane to RG with Harlow at RT. The O-Line showed they can
play with anyone and with Drew, Coates and ROY (I want to curse him now,
do not want him to win it for fear he'll end up like Stephens, Russell)
Martin, add a real #1 WR to the mix and this offense will be just fine.
The other side of the ball isn't as bad as they played. Brown will
have his knee 'scoped and should be 100% by spring, Johnson made some
rookie mistakes but is a solid player. Law is not the cover man Hurst
was, (don't laugh Hurst was a very good cover guy) but is a rookie and
will get better. Reynolds ain't bad but is overpaid. Both safties,
Ray and especially Guyton have to be replaced. As does everyone down
DL'man.
Jerry
|
56.2245 | My post-Christmas wish... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:21 | 11 |
|
...is that Bill Parcells stays as coach, and that the Patriots hire a
decent GM. I don't always like Parcells' decisions, but it's obvious that
he's brought a sense of stability and discipline to a franchise that has
needed it from the word "go". On the other hand, I occasionally have delusions
that even *I* could do a better job as GM...
Jerry, that Little River Band p-name has *got* to go. I'm ashamed I even
know who did the song... :-)
-Roland
|
56.2246 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:28 | 3 |
56.2247 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 26 1995 13:41 | 17 |
|
>> Law is not the cover man Hurst was, (don't laugh Hurst was a very
>> good cover guy) but is a rookie and will get better.
Hurst was a good enough cover man to get to the Pro Bowl. Law
strikes me as a safety not a corner. Except for one poor effort
Saturday, he's as sure a tackler as the Pats have in their sec-
ondary (faint praise, I know). On the plus side, we do have the
6th or 7th overall pick in the next draft. We should be able
to fill one of our many needs with that. Keyshawn Johnson the
wideout from USC would be nice but he probably won't be there.
I don't want Illini linebacker Simeon Rice who probably will be
there. After seeing him manhandled by Kyle Brady last year, I ain't
at all impressed.
MIkeyH, if you know Phillippi, sell him on playing up here. Please.
|
56.2248 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:04 | 6 |
|
This weekends paper listed Bledsoe, Coates, Vincent Brown, and Max
Lane. As players who will be having off season surgery. Drews surgery
will be on his seperated shoulder.
Ron
|
56.2249 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:10 | 5 |
|
Damn if I'm not wrong again. All the more reason to root for
the Pack! :^)
Claybone
|
56.2250 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Oh, Come Ollie Matson | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:16 | 9 |
| That last 3 minutes, in fact the whole fourth quarter had to be the
craziest segment I've seen since the wacky old days of the Patriots.
In fact what WAS a certain stability with Parcells now looks like the
old days when the Patriots found ways to lose.
Marchibroda had to be wondering a little too seeing a game in the can
turn into a nail biter. If I were Kraft I wouldn't encourage Parcells
to come back. Perhaps a strong draft and a weak schedule will turn
things around.
|
56.2251 | get some one who eats QBs for breakfast... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:19 | 10 |
| >Keyshawn Johnson the
> wideout from USC would be nice but he probably won't be there.
Perhaps not, but maybe Terry Glenn will leave early?
Putting on my GM hat, if I've got a choice between a prime wide receiver and a
pass-rushing defensive lineman with bad intentions with my high #1, I'll take
the lineman every time. I think you can probably get at least a *good* wide
receiver via the free agent market for reasonable money, while a pass-rushing
stud lineman will cost you Reggie White (the *real* Reggie White) bucks.
|
56.2252 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:29 | 3 |
56.2253 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Dec 26 1995 14:48 | 10 |
|
>> Perhaps not, but maybe Terry Glenn will leave early?
I'd like Glenn but don't know if I'd draft him that early.
If I was going to draft the best player available, I'd take
Ogden the OL from UCLA. At 6'8" 310, he has the size Parcells
loves and he's athletic. Unfortunately, he'll probably be gone
too because I've heard that this promises to be one of the
weaker drafts in recent history.
|
56.2254 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Dec 26 1995 15:02 | 10 |
| Supposedly, the 310 lbs. is a little conservative (more like 315 or so), and
he runs a 4.8 40, too. I can't *drive* the 40 in 4.8...
He's definitely the man if you go for "best available".
If you can't get Keyshawn, you could do worse than taking a flyer on Marvin
Harrison (Syracuse) in one of the later rounds. In addition to being a decent
wide receiver, he's also an excellent punt returner.
JoeG, am I getting Marvin's name right? I'm on cold medication...
|
56.2255 | This is NFL jeenyus thinking... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | It takes a train to cry | Wed Dec 27 1995 10:08 | 14 |
|
> He may indeed be durable and great pick by bumbling
> stumbling GM Parcells.
One of the great CYA lines of the season was Parcells stating that
if he hadn't lost Kevin Turner, the Pats wouldn't now have Martin.
It was stated with a hint of smugness, but if anything, if you think
about it, all it does is reinforce the idea that Parcells got lucky
(once, not overall). Doesn't make a whole lot of sense, anyway. If
the Pats hadn't signed Meggett, would they have drafted Martin higher?
I think not.
glenn
|
56.2256 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Dec 27 1995 10:43 | 7 |
|
Martin's great, no question, love him and hope we keep him.
But ask me if I'd rather have last year's 10-6 team without
him than this year's 6-10 team with him...
- Sean
|
56.2257 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Dec 27 1995 10:48 | 7 |
|
The reason why Parcells said that we wouldn't have Martin if we
didn't lose Kevin Turner. Is because the Pats were given Philly's
3rd round pick for them signing Turner. The Pats picked Martin with
Phillys 3rd round pick.
Ron
|
56.2258 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Dec 27 1995 12:22 | 13 |
|
> The reason why Parcells said that we wouldn't have Martin if we
>didn't lose Kevin Turner. Is because the Pats were given Philly's
>3rd round pick for them signing Turner. The Pats picked Martin with
>Phillys 3rd round pick.
So? We could have still picked Martin. He was, what, the 10th RB
picked, and not our first pick.
I don't get Parcell's excuse. He should have said "If we had Turner,
I wouldn't have tried to get any other RB, including Martin," but
keeping Turner had nothing to do with getting or not getting Martin.
He was available when we picked.
|
56.2259 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Wed Dec 27 1995 13:07 | 5 |
| I can't see any reason whatsoever that the Pats would
pick anyone but a DB or WR with their first few picks.
billl
|
56.2260 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Dec 27 1995 13:17 | 26 |
|
>> I can't see any reason whatsoever that the Pats would
>> pick anyone but a DB or WR with their first few picks.
They also need serious d-line help. I agree with the
best available athlete philosophy. If there's a Jonathan
Ogden available you have to take him. If there's Steve
Walsh available and you already have Troy Aikman you
take him anyways which is exactly what Dallas did. If
he's that good someone will trade value for him or you
have a very talented backup. If you draft strictly for
need you run the risk of a down year in terms of the pos-
ition you want to fill and you end up with a mediocre player
who isn't quite good enough.
As for Tuna's Turner excuse making. It's lame. And no Tuna
probably wouldn't have drafted Martin higher. When Faulk was
in the draft Tuna said he wouldn't take him because RB was
always one of the deepest positions in the draft. He got Curtis
in the 3rd. I'm sure Tuna thinks he could replace a Turner
in the 3rd round of any draft. And he's probably right. He
may have gotten lucky drafting Martin but Turner goes and
Gash steps in and becomes a Pro Bowl fullback. I don't think
that part is luck. Gash is a Parcells type fullback. Turner
isn't.
|
56.2261 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Wed Dec 27 1995 15:54 | 7 |
| That's more the point. If we had Turner at fullback the development in
6-8 games of Martin as a premier running back behind Gash's blocking
wouldn't have happened. Not that a healthy Turner couldn't have helped
this team though.
How does the nfl with a cap and all decide that a Turner gets a 3rd
round draft pick in compensation?
|
56.2262 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Wed Dec 27 1995 19:09 | 11 |
| From today's USAToday:
1996 Patriot home games: Buffalo, Miami, Indy, Jets,
Denver, Jacksonville, Washington, Arizona
Don't see this making for any large volumns of new
season ticket sales.
billl
|
56.2263 | Could have been worse | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 28 1995 08:15 | 9 |
| You'd be surprised just how many fans Denver/Washington have.. Then
there's the NEW KID in Jacksonville and Arizona could be an exciting
team...
Im sure the fans could think of some better teams but this isnt TOO
TOO BAD...
PLUS they should end up with a very good home record.
MaB
|
56.2264 | Couldn't see that one coming... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Dec 28 1995 08:41 | 2 |
|
Pats fired their defensive backs coach yesterday - what a surprise!
|
56.2265 | Lousy schedule | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 28 1995 09:22 | 12 |
|
> You'd be surprised just how many fans Denver/Washington have.. Then
> there's the NEW KID in Jacksonville and Arizona could be an exciting
> team...
They are all mediocre teams. Arizona exciting? Their offense makes
bingo night at the old folks home look like the Mardi Gras. Washington
might be interesting if Heath Shuler keeps progressing. What this schedule
will probably do is return the Pats to the playoffs and give everyone the
the false impression that they fixed what was broke this year even if
it ain't. If we had played better this year we'd have had the cream
of the NFC east - Dallas and Philly instead of the dregs.
|
56.2266 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Dec 28 1995 09:33 | 8 |
| >Arizona exciting?
No, but with Butty the Hut gone they could be.
Dave Krieg isn't Dan Marino, but he's not Trent Dilfer either. Some decent
backs such as Garrison Hearst, Larry Centers, and Ron Moore, and the WRs aren't
bad either. The defense has Eric Swann. They're not that far away from being
a good team - it just looked like a chasm with Buddy at the helm...
|
56.2267 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | It takes a train to cry | Thu Dec 28 1995 09:45 | 9 |
|
Yeah, it's a pretty dull schedule. Denver may have a lot of fans,
but through the luck of the draw it seems that the Patriots are
forever playing them. Meanwhile, Pittsburgh still hasn't been
back to Foxboro since 1979. That's a long time for a conference
opponent.
glenn
|
56.2268 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Dec 28 1995 10:02 | 13 |
|
>> Dave Krieg isn't Dan Marino, but he's not Trent Dilfer either.
After watching the Dallas game this weekend it's easy to see why
Larry Centers broke the receiving record for backs - Krieg can't
throw down field. If he could have, Phoenix could have made a game
of it because Dallas was sloppy early. It's not Krieg's fault.
Age is catching up with him. The guy is older than most stadiums
in the league. I haven't seen Phoenix with Chris Miller but he
would seem to be better able than Krieg to take advantage of what
weapons they do have. Still, I'd much rather have had the top of the
NFC East than the likes of Phoenix no matter how much they improve
next year.
|
56.2269 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Dec 28 1995 10:22 | 10 |
| >I haven't seen Phoenix with Chris Miller
Most of us haven't - he plays for the St. Louis Rams...
>Still, I'd much rather have had the top of the
> NFC East than the likes of Phoenix no matter how much they improve
> next year.
Agreed - I wasn't contesting that. I was just saying that Arizona isn't that
far away from being good/entertaining...
|
56.2270 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Dec 28 1995 11:19 | 11 |
56.2271 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Thu Dec 28 1995 11:51 | 6 |
| The road games are, along with everyone in their division,
Cleveland/Baltimore, San Diego, Dallas and NY Giants.
billl
|
56.2272 | one p.o.'d Pats fan | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 17 1996 08:59 | 44 |
|
Well, they did it... The Pats have offered Pat Harlow to Oakland
for a 2nd round pick in this year's draft.
I already know I'm going to take heat for this, so I'm not even going
to try to be cordial about it. This move stinks and Bill's an idiot
who is ruining the team I cheer for. Trading for 2nd round picks - that's
what REBUILDING teams do!
Half the things he does shows me that this is a short term business;
like getting rid of players the fans like and bringing in players
we don't. "Team" is sacrificed for "individual" all in the name of
"winning." Okay, it's the 90's, that's how Sports, Inc. is run these days.
But Bill doesn't have the "team" or the "winning."
Then half the things Bill does make it seems like he's starting yet
another rebuilding year. Tell me, Bill, in your 4th year here
are you still rebuilding? Do you have Clue 1 what you are
doing? Want me to polish those 2 Rings for ya?
At least when Cunningham and Hannah and Grogan and Tippet and Marion
and Goad were playing and losing, you enjoyed watching the team play
(and you could generally count on seeing them from year to year).
I liked, respected, and enjoyed watching Harlow play. What do I
watch now? Bledsoe moping and pouting after Eason-ing out on another
play or throwing into a defender's raised hands?
I don't care how this draft turns out, the Pats are going nowhere, and
that without a plan. All you Bill apologists, flame away, I don't
care, you slammed me for saying this 4 years ago, and so far, I've been
right.
Sure, we might actually beat our 6-win record from last year, thanks to
our favorable schedule, maybe just enough to give everybody that
elusive "hope" again... but you'll see... next year or the year
after, Bill will be gone, trailing behind him a pile of excuses about
how the game has passed him by (which many have been telling him), and
everybody will feel bad for this stubborn mule and how he couldn't
duplicate his past accomplishments (2 Rings, beating the Bills and Broncos,
both 0-4 in Super Bowls). All the while, us fans have lost 4 or so
precious years of wasting incredible talent and $$$$.
- Sean
|
56.2273 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Wed Apr 17 1996 09:22 | 9 |
| Sean,
A 2nd round pick for a backup making 1+ mill in the last year of a
contract is not bad. Lane did a good job last year and is a better run
blocker then Harlow. Harlow is a talented player but not irreplacable.
Lighten up. And as for ruining the team. Before he got there they
were 2-14. Last year was tough but the year before they were in the
playoffs. That's not Ruining a team. Especially not this franchise.
Mike
|
56.2274 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 17 1996 10:20 | 16 |
|
Pats with Bill: 5-11, 10-6, 6-10
That while getting what no other coach has gotten in New England
(full control) and while getting paid more than any other coach.
That while my ticket prices skyrocketed.
His history of blunders speaks for itself. How many coaches get
this many chances.
- Sean
P.S. Harlow was a backup 'cause he got injured. I guess you wouldn't
have minded losing that "backup" Bledsoe when he went down for
a bunch of weeks a few years back.
|
56.2275 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Wed Apr 17 1996 11:03 | 2 |
| Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
I
|
56.2276 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Wed Apr 17 1996 11:13 | 8 |
|
Patriots are going nowhere in 1996, regardless. They locked into
too many big contracts, so the flexibility to do much about it is
severely limited. Expanded-playoff wildcard berth, due to scheduling
break, at best...
glenn
|
56.2277 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Wed Apr 17 1996 11:31 | 8 |
| I don't know Glenn. All of the other AFC Least contenders have lost key
players to Free Agency. The Colts are probably the favorites and the
Pats are very close to them talent wise. A draft like last year will
put the Pats even closer. It will all come down to Bledsoe and the
receivers and the Defense. I feel better about this team going into
this year then last.
Mike
|
56.2278 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 17 1996 12:16 | 10 |
|
> Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
When did Harlow get the chance? He didn't get back into rotation.
Parcells had some kind of chip on his shoulder about him, as he is
wont to do with many players, and decided he could make do with Lane.
Pat was publically miffed at the slight.
- Sean
|
56.2279 | Coach 2rings ain't all he's cracked up to be. | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Apr 17 1996 12:47 | 11 |
|
I don't normally agree with Sean but he is right on here. Harlow is
better than Lane in every aspect of the game but he got hurt in training
camp last year and didn't come back fast enough for Tuna and ended up
in the dog house. Parcells may be a great coach, I haven't seen it in
New England, but as a GM he is terrible. The Pats are saddled with that
stiff Jeff Dellenbaugh he picked up from the Fins last year at about 2M.
Lane may be a decent tackle but I would take Harlow in a minute.
Jerry
|
56.2280 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Apr 17 1996 12:52 | 7 |
|
From a Raider Fans perspective.
THANK YOU BILL!!!
|
56.2281 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Wed Apr 17 1996 13:06 | 14 |
|
Parcells has a thing about playing hurt and Harlow never did.
Bye, Pat. The flip side is that Vincent Brown *did* play hurt
but after years of playing for pennies when it came time to
get paid like the big boys it was "bye, Vincent." The moral
of the story is anybody's guess. Harlow was a nice player early
on but he was on the DL (disabled list) more than on the OL and
at 1.2 mil a year that made him expendable.
As for Parcells, this is a make or break year. If he logs
another season like last year the Patriots bandwagon will
empty quicker than you can say "these guys stink". The only
saving grace is that in this era the trip from top to bottom
and vice versa has been considerably shortened.
|
56.2282 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Wed Apr 17 1996 13:16 | 13 |
| >>Harlow was better at the end of the year and couldn't beat out Lane.
>When did Harlow get the chance? He didn't get back into rotation.
Don't you think if the coaching staff thought he could play better he
would have played or is this another one of these instances where the
fans know more then the coaches? Lane did a damn good job blocking last
year. Martin was one of the top rushers in the NFL last year and a lot
of those yards were to the right side. Harlow is a good tackle. If he
wasn't the Raiders wouldn't be giving up a high draft pick. Hopefully
they can take the pick and get someone who can fill one of their weak
spots.
|
56.2283 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 17 1996 13:36 | 23 |
|
> Don't you think if the coaching staff thought he could play better he
> would have played or is this another one of these instances where the
> fans know more then the coaches?
You mean like Scott Sisson? He easily lost 5 games all by himself
on the way to the Pats' 1993 1-11 start. Bill finally puts in Bahr
and we win the last 4 in a row.
For the past 3 years, the Pats' fans *have* known more than the coaches.
I know there's a lot of people who loathe that talk in SPORTS.NOTE, but
there it is.
Bill proves it himself every year by finally, slowly, begrudgingly, doing
what the fans have been calling for long before he noticed it. Like
playing the $119K Wollaugh over the $2M Dellenbach. Like going to 4-3
this year. Like dumping Butts. Over and over and over again, Parcells
is a dime short and a day late with his decisions. You've all said it
yourself in here - these days, you cannot wast precious time like you
used to be able to in the NFL.
- Sean
|
56.2284 | Pro football ain't where it's at! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Thanks UMass for a great season! | Wed Apr 17 1996 14:18 | 6 |
| A few notes back somebody asked what it all meant, when Harlow wouldn't
play hurt and he got cut, then Vincent Brown plays hurt and his reward
is that he gets cut, too. What it all means is that we should all be
teaching our sons to be baseball players!
NAZZ
|
56.2285 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Wed Apr 17 1996 14:52 | 8 |
| Nazz,
Were you listening to Steve Lyons? Someone was ragging on him about the
differance between the NFL and MLB average players. He said something like
"Well let me see I can play in the NFL for 1 mill not guarenteed, and if I
play for 4 years not walk normally for the rest of my life or I can get
paid 3mill/year guarenteed and be able to walk normal."
Which one would you rather do?
|
56.2286 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 17 1996 15:42 | 4 |
|
Steve Lyons was acting like a jerk the day I heard him on 'EEI.
He's right about -.1, but he really came of bad other than that.
|
56.2287 | EIght years of dedication with nothing to show for it | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Thanks UMass for a great season! | Thu Apr 18 1996 10:11 | 12 |
| I didn't hear Lyons, but even with the progress the NFL player's union
has made over the past 15-20 years, it is still light years behind
major league baseball.
I guess I was just disappointed in how the Patriots treated Vincent
Brown. He is a really good guy, he busted his butt and played hurt for
them, signed a contract that was back-loaded, and got cut before he
could collect the final two years of that contract. And according to
Bob Kraft, Brown was his favorite player! I can't imagine trteating a
played he hated any worse.
NAZZ
|
56.2288 | Could the owners and players agree to this? | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu Apr 18 1996 10:42 | 10 |
| Re-1
That's why I think the CBA should allow a team one exemption from the
salary cap for one veteran who has been with the same team for more
then 7 years. You might need to limit the $ paid to 2 mill/yr but
players like Brown, Phill Simms, Art Monk, Andre Tippet etc who have
given their teams years of play should not be cut because they are risks
to be hurt or because of injuries are not what they used to be.
Mike
|
56.2289 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Thu Apr 18 1996 11:21 | 44 |
|
> I guess I was just disappointed in how the Patriots treated Vincent
> Brown. He is a really good guy, he busted his butt and played hurt for
> them, signed a contract that was back-loaded, and got cut before he
> could collect the final two years of that contract. And according to
> Bob Kraft, Brown was his favorite player! I can't imagine trteating a
> played he hated any worse.
I agree 100%. That's why the answer to Tommy's musing about the
"moral of the story" is painfully obvious.
I know that this is the era of Free Agency and sports enthusiasts the
world over are having a ball with the Rotisserie Leagues, but
I am one fan who really misses the days when "team" meant more. When
Vincent would have been treated well. When the benifits of Goad's
spirit and enthusiasm would have outweighed any talent or size failings
he may have had in the eyes of the coaches and owners. When we could
see the same guys on "our" team year after year. When Harlow would be
given the benifit of the doubt after his injury.
No teams are "our" teams anymore. They are just a collection of
individuals with stats, replaceable on a yearly basis by another
collection of players with stats. Even if the Pats win a Super Bowl
I will never feel the emotion/agony/excitement/adrenaline I did in
'76 vs. the Raiders or '85 vs. the Dolphins.
Teams are just paper now. That's the way things are. The Leagues have
forced us not to care. We've embraced it, in fact - we love those dreaded
Rotisserie Leagues, we love watching and guessing and predicting Free Agency
moves.
And, I guess I'm in the minority, because attendance isn't going down,
it's going up. For me, though, rooting for teams is becoming less
emotional every day. I would rather watch Vincent Brown play than some
new guy who might be 1) less of an injury risk 2) 3% taller or 3) a
trade-off for the salary cap.
Clinging to ties like rooting for your alma mater are about all there is
left now.
- Sean
|
56.2290 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 18 1996 12:37 | 15 |
| According to Parcells he can't afford to pay Brown's salary if he gets
injured just like he felt he had to keep playing Hurst when injured and
probably realizes now that he's stuck for Hurst's full salary last
year.
I don't think either side would actually vote the 7 year plan in. With
the 'Cap it's what you see is what you get. The GM really has to
husband the money. Unfortunately Sean is about right - Parcells
doesn't really have the grey matter to be doing that part of the job,
which is a shame since he does seem to understand the football end.
An example is the Bledsoe situation where he has 7 mil tied up there
but is paying peanuts to the receiving corps. Pittsbugh seems to be
doing the opposite, it has the receivers but wouldn't pay the
quarterback.
|
56.2291 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Apr 18 1996 12:53 | 5 |
|
The lack of a "TEAM" concept has been caused by GREED, caused
by both the owners and the players.
Ron
|
56.2292 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 18 1996 12:55 | 10 |
| I don't know Billte. I think Pitt was willing to pay the QB. 4 million for
ODonnell was an excellent offer considering his talents and lack of bigtime
accomplishments. It's not their fault that the Jets were so desperate they
were willing to overpay Neil by roughly 2 million. Bledsoe on the other hand
robbed the Patriots blind. I'd place Bledsoe's worth at about 2.5 to 3 million
based on what he has accomplished so far and I don't think that he'll ever be
worth more than 5 million per and that's based on the number of shirts and
other paraphenelia sold with the number 11 on it......
mike
|
56.2293 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Apr 18 1996 15:02 | 8 |
| billte, me thinks it's tome for your nap again.
At $3.5M, O'D would have been a good buy for the Steelers.
(That happens to be what they offered.) At $5M he's a stiff
for no matter who is dumb enough to pay it.
billl
|
56.2294 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 18 1996 16:50 | 16 |
| That's a fine opinion and I'll fight for your right to express it. It
does not address my point whcih is the Steelers and Pats have the same
problem for 96 the passing attack vis a vis use of money. Pitt has it
tied up in receivers, the Pats in the qb. The smart teams don't just
put it in one place, although I'm not sure how much all those receivers
of yours cost.
I think the offer was 3.5 and O'D said he would've taken 4m prior to
the final humongous offer. I think I'm pretty clear at this point
about Pitt not thinking O'Donnell worth signing for the $, just not
entirely clear about what Pitt plans to do now that he's a Jet except
for some vague plan to do with castoffs,minor leaguers and this Slash
character.
At least you're in the Central where you can train a qb and maybe still
make the playoffs.
|
56.2295 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 18 1996 17:23 | 3 |
| Just how much are the Steelers paying these gifted receivers of theirs? Given
their usual prudency with cash I wouldn't be surprised to find out that
they're paying their receivers less than the Pats are.......
|
56.2296 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Apr 19 1996 09:07 | 6 |
| Gotta love these New Hampshirites:
Opine Free or Die!
8^)
|
56.2297 | Yeh, the l seems to be right | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Fri Apr 19 1996 12:23 | 3 |
| Considering that egg-besplattered Conneticut face of yours from the
Kaspar's a twit fiasco we're not the only free-opinioned state in the
union.
|
56.2298 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Apr 19 1996 13:47 | 15 |
| > -< Yeh, the l seems to be right >-
>
> Considering that egg-besplattered Conneticut face of yours from the
> Kaspar's a twit fiasco we're not the only free-opinioned state in the
> union.
Kasper's still NOT done anything more than Sutter.... The jury is still out on
him.
All I said that I just had a little more respect for him.
Think of it like this -- he's gone from total twit to someone who should know
better and needs to prove it....
|
56.2299 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Apr 23 1996 09:23 | 2 |
| So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?
|
56.2300 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Apr 23 1996 09:36 | 3 |
|
I'm not real happy with it. :^(
|
56.2301 | Peter bigger timebomb than Phillips (who I wouldn't worry about) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Apr 23 1996 10:12 | 15 |
|
> So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
> should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?
For all the talk around Lawrence Phillips' transgressions, the
only reason Peter didn't get much more bad pub is because he's not
as well known, nor as good a player. Peter has been in more scrapes,
taken more battery and sexual harrassment charges (nolo contendre,
Nebraska Cornhusker), including another one right up through last month.
All of which makes Bob Kraft Mr. Capital H Hypocrite if really did
say as quoted that he'd never draft a player like Lawrence Phillips.
glenn
|
56.2302 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Apr 23 1996 10:34 | 21 |
|
After seeing the story about a Tennessee player who was accused of
rape, its hard to say how you handle these types of incidents. The
player was suspended from the team and didn't play this season. The
season was pretty much over and the case was dismissed. So the player
missed his entire senior season for nothing. The player had two options
petition the NCAA to grant him another year of eligibility, or enter
the NFL draft. He entered the NFL draft because he wouldn't know what
the NCAA's decesion would be, before he had to file for the draft.
Plus, the fact that once your accused you always have a reputation. I
don't know if this player was drafted. He never denied having sex with
the woman, he claims it was consentual, she being only 17 said it
wasn't. The grand jury and prosecution believed him and dropped the
case.
As far as Christian Peter goes, the Patriots investigated his
past. According to what I have read is that he hasn't had any problems
since pleading "no contest" in 1994. He was given 18 months probation
which just recently was completed.
Ron
|
56.2303 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Apr 23 1996 10:53 | 8 |
| > as well known, nor as good a player. Peter has been in more scrapes,
> taken more battery and sexual harrassment charges (nolo contendre,
> Nebraska Cornhusker), including another one right up through last month.
Hey, maybe he just cut his finger going into a drawer for a knife. You know.
8^)
|
56.2304 | Hope racism is not involved here | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Thanks UMass for a great season! | Tue Apr 23 1996 11:13 | 5 |
| Is the fact that CHristian Peter is white have anything to do with his
relative lack of notariety? Seems like his offenses were just as
severe and more extensive than what Phillips did.
NAZZ
|
56.2305 | The guy is a wackjob... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Apr 23 1996 11:15 | 10 |
|
> As far as Christian Peter goes, the Patriots investigated his
> past. According to what I have read is that he hasn't had any problems
> since pleading "no contest" in 1994.
Not correct. Peter again just pled no contest last month, 15 yards,
excessive fondling...
glenn
|
56.2306 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Apr 23 1996 11:53 | 3 |
| Maybe the Pats hope to "channel his energy"...
Size-wise, he seems to fit what Parcells is looking for - over 300 pounds.
|
56.2307 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Apr 23 1996 12:19 | 22 |
| >> So, what do you folks think of the Patriots drafting Nebraska
>> should-have-been-ex-con Christian Peter?
Disappointed but not surprised. The NFL and pro sports in general
has always placed a bigger premium on athletic ability than on
personal conduct. If Lawrence Taylor didn't have the ability he
had, Parcells never would have put up with his off field antics
in New York. Dexter Manley's career would have lasted two weeks
in Washington. And Steve Howe wouldn't be attempting his 47th come-
back. The owners (as always) talk a good fight but when it comes
right down to it all they really care about is the bottom line.
BTW - In today's column Will McDonough writes that the shift in
power over personnel from Parcells to Bobby Grier bodes ill
for the Patsies future. Will seems to have forgotten that
it was George Young who built those championship Giants teams.
And Will seems to have forgitten the high-priced free agents
that Tuna has brought in and who have almost to a man been
complete busts. I would have preferred Daryll Gardener to
Terry Glenn but Parcells apparently didn't want him either.
|
56.2308 | Let Parcells coach - it's what he does best | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Thanks UMass for a great season! | Tue Apr 23 1996 12:23 | 9 |
| I agree with yuo Tommy, about both the NFL willingness to look the
other way on certain "personality defects" as long as the lad can run
through a brick wall. And McDonough as usual is smarmy and
self-serving. Who does he think he's kidding with this demise of the
Pats stuff? Parcells will cut whoever he wants, he just doesn't obtain
the players. It worked pretty well in New York; no reason it won't
work well here.
NAZZ
|
56.2309 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Apr 23 1996 12:29 | 22 |
| I disagree that it was Young alone who built the Giants.
Young had a couple of excellent picks before Parcells came. But if you look
at the picks made during their joint tenure, when the two of the would argue
and fight like cats and dogs over personnel, you'll find that those were far
better than any draft choices since.
George Young has been in a five year slump, and Mr Ego-As-Big-As-His-Ears
doesn't appear to have done any better this year, although he did kinda get
stiffed by everyone in front of him this year.
What happened to Parcells and Young is what people PREDICTED would happen to
Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis when they split -- neither would be as good as they
were together.
Don't sell Parcells short, except that he won't be as good with Young to fight
with him.
Hey, now there's an idea -- you guys want George Young????? You can have him
along with the plastic grass he'll put back in Foxboro.....
|
56.2311 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Apr 23 1996 14:35 | 16 |
| re .2310,
HUH?
Terry Glenn ran a 4.37 in the 40, I don't think the TE ran
better than 4.5. Forget about how fast he can run, The man seems to
have glue on his hands, which is what I like about him.
As far as Darryl Gardener, he lasted until the 20th pick, as far as
Tony Brackens goes he went 33rd. Which sort of justifies the Patriots
taking Terry Glenn with the 7th pick. If either one of those players
were that good to be taken with the 7th pick, they wouldn't have had
3 or 4 other DE/DL men drafted ahead of them and would have been
drafted by someone else in the top 10.
Ron
|
56.2313 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 14:48 | 9 |
|
Yes he was faster than Glenn.
And he now plays for DA RAIDAS!!!
Chap
|
56.2315 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 15:14 | 3 |
|
Rickey Dudley 4.48
|
56.2316 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Apr 23 1996 15:27 | 15 |
|
>>As far as Darryl Gardener, he lasted until the 20th pick, as far as
>>Tony Brackens goes he went 33rd. Which sort of justifies the Patriots
>>taking Terry Glenn with the 7th pick. If either one of those players
>>were that good to be taken with the 7th pick, they wouldn't have had
>>3 or 4 other DE/DL men drafted ahead of them and would have been
>>drafted by someone else in the top 10.
How many backs were taken in fron of Emmitt Smith? How many QBs taken
in front of Dan Marino? How many DLs in front of Leon Lett? Where
you're taken is not an absolute indication of how good a plyer your
are or will be. I can live with the Glenn pick but I would have loved
Gardener. Him being picked 20th just means the Pats could have moved
down, acquired more picks and still have gotten him.
|
56.2317 | Keeshawn maybe | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Apr 23 1996 15:54 | 8 |
|
Lets see......4.37 is quicker than 4.46 so Glenn is faster than
Dudley. Not that 4.46 is not a incredible time for a TE. Secondly
who is Leshon Johnson?
Jerry
|
56.2319 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Apr 23 1996 15:57 | 18 |
| re .2316,
I see your point on where was Emmitt Smith drafted and where was
Dan Marino drafted. The question is all 30 teams rate players and
create a draft board. Did ANY of the 30 teams have Gardener or Brackens
in there top 10 list?, I doubt it. If we had access to all 30 teams draft
boards and who they had rated as the top 30 prospects. I would guess
that EVERY team had between 20-25 of the same players in there top 30.
The odds say that, the player you have rated in the top 10, will
be a better player then your 100th rated player. You will have your
lucky/fluke picks, this is where Emmitt and Marino come in. At the
time they were drafted NOBODY had them rated in the top 10, NOBODY knew
they would be that good. Who was the #7 pick the year Dan Marino was
drafted and who was the #7 pick the year Emmitt Smith was drafted? I
don't know, but the odds say they were quality players.
Ron
|
56.2320 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 16:08 | 4 |
|
I heard the same thing I didn't know Glenn ran a 4.37? If'n I was
the pats I would have drafted Harrison from Da Cuse!!
|
56.2321 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Apr 23 1996 16:44 | 9 |
| What did you say, Chappy???? You mean you wouldn't draft a guy
from Georgetown??!!!! :-)
I'll be watching Marvin Harrison with great interest. He's a big-play
guy. Let's see if Harbaugh can get him the ball deep...
Glenn may or may not have been the best pick, but as an earlier reply said,
he is a quality player. The guy made TONS of plays last year. And 4.37 is
not exactly turtle-like...
|
56.2322 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:08 | 13 |
| YOu guys know that those speed numbers are not the be all and end all.
How often have we heard that once you put the pads on it all changes.
I keep hearing about Jerry Rice. Put in him a timed 40 and he doesn't do that
well. Put him in pads with a guy on his ass and he lights the afterburner.
What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
was that he was a headcase. Any truth to that allegation?
'Saw
|
56.2323 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:15 | 11 |
| >What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
>was that he was a headcase. Any truth to that allegation?
Probably not.
He has been through a lot. Never knew his dad, his mom committed suicide
when he was 14 (?), he moved in with his aunts but couldn't get along with
them, then moved in with a friend's family. My guess is that he grew up
while very young and grew up quickly.
Giant fans know almost as much as Jet fans... :-)
|
56.2324 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:16 | 2 |
| ...and Terry Glenn will probably have to listen to Christian Peter
moan about how tough he has it...
|
56.2325 | If Parcells didn't like him, that's a plus... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:26 | 9 |
|
> What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
> was that he was a headcase. Any truth to that allegation?
Yeah, so? What business is that of the giants' newsgroup?
glenn
|
56.2326 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:30 | 17 |
| re the Giants newsgroup:
Bein' on the internet it's wide open. Probably more Raider and
Cowboy's fans out there most times.....
>> What I had heard about Glenn, floating around alt.sports.pro-football.ny-giants
>> was that he was a headcase. Any truth to that allegation?
>
> Yeah, so? What business is that of the giants' newsgroup?
They heard that Glenn went into baseball and figured he must be
crazy....
|
56.2327 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Apr 24 1996 10:55 | 5 |
|
Terry Glenn's mother didn't commit suicide she was murdered,
she got shot during a bar altercation.
Ron
|
56.2328 | a connection | HBAHBA::HAAS | floor,chair,couch,bed | Wed Apr 24 1996 11:50 | 18 |
| and now for the Carolinas connection...
The local media are saying that New Orleans really wanted Biakabutuka
bad. Knowing that the Painters would take him if'n he was still
available, the Saints went to the Pats and tried to swap picks and some
throw ins. The Pats woulda got the Saints' #11 pick which, supposedly,
Parcells wanted to use for DE Duane Clemons. The Saints would then take
Biakabutuka as the #7 pick.
Now, at this point, two stories are floating around. The firsted is that
the Saints weren't offering enough to sweeten the deal. The other is that
owner Kraft intervened and went along with Player Personnel Director
Grier and stuck with Terry Glenn.
FWIW, the Painters claim they woulda traded down if'n Biakabutuka had not
been around at #8.
TTom
|
56.2329 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Wed Apr 24 1996 12:23 | 9 |
| Ttom Will McDonough, a local Bill Parcells mouthpiece had two articles
in the Glove: The first on Saturday intimated that Parcells was
battling with owner Kraft and predicting that Parcells would lose and
Kraft (and Grier) would take Glenn.
Then after the pick Will speculated that Bill had seriously lost face
... and was talked about in here. You're tale adds more fuel, I'm
surprised McDonough wasn't aware of it. But Parcells seemed to want
the guy who went earlier than #7 anyway.
|
56.2330 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Apr 24 1996 12:40 | 12 |
|
What Tom said is pretty much right on the money. The Patriots
were offered the #11 pick and something for the #7 pick, from NO.
IMO once Cedric Jones was taken, the Patriots were taking a WR with
the #7 pick, regardless of what Parcells wanted to do. Kraft/Grier
felt that someone would trade up into the 8, 9, OR 10 slot and
draft Glenn, so they didn't want to take a chance. Parcells opinion
was to trade down to #11 and see what happens. If Glenn is still there
at #11 you draft him, if not you take a Regen Upshaw, Duane Clemons,
or Darryl Gardener, and go WR in the 2nd round.
Ron
|
56.2332 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 24 1996 19:26 | 6 |
|
Christian Peter was released by the Pats today.
Now there's plannin' for ya...
- Sean
|
56.2333 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Apr 24 1996 19:35 | 21 |
|
Will McDounough is a flaming moron. That article that Tommy mentioned
was just another in a long line of butt-kissin' manure. If Will's
not shilling for the NFL or making misinformed idiotic predictions,
he'll take the time out to show his ignorance with an editorial like
this.
Parcells loses power 'cause he didn't get his way? He SHOULDN'T get
his way... With GM moves he's proved a hundred bazillion times he's
not up to the task. His SB's were won when he wasn't making them and
he's got a pretty sorry success rate making them here in NE.
The last line of that article really cracks me up - that the Giants
didn't pick Glenn and they don't have any famous WR's either.
Supposedly this proves that Bill was right to not want one, too.
Yeah, Will, that's why the Giants are living in the same neighborhood
as the Pats - the cellar.
Man, that guy irks me.
- Sean
|
56.2334 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 08:52 | 12 |
|
The Giants didn't take Glenn cause it would have been a wasted pick. If they
had a QB that could get him the ball then maybe he'd have been worth it but
with Duck Brown at the helm a premier WR isn't going to produce anyways. I
think the Pats should have taken Eric Moulds myself. I think he'll be better
than Glenn in the long run. Also as someone else was saying either in here
or ::Giants they could have had Bobby Engram in the second round who may not
have the balzing speed but all he does is makes plays and lots of them.
So it appears the Pats are being run by a woman now..........hahaaa
;^)
|
56.2335 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu Apr 25 1996 09:56 | 10 |
| Oh my God I almost totally agree with Sean. :^) With the Salary Cap and
Free Agency it takes more then one person today to run an
organization's draft, Free Agency and trades because with they all tie
together in the Salary structure. Jimmy Johnson came back and the first
thing he did was hire his old personnel director from the Eagles.
McDonough remains in the 70's and 80's where he developed all his
contacts like Shula, Parcells and Knoll. The days of a coach having
total control and wearing more then one hat is just about gone.
Mike
|
56.2336 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Apr 25 1996 10:13 | 6 |
|
If Will McDonough was any good at evaluating football talent, he
would still be a GM somewhere in the league, instead he is kissing up
to current GM's so he can make a living writing.
Ron
|
56.2337 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 25 1996 10:44 | 9 |
| I never knew Will McDonough worked in the NFL as a GM. I really only
became aware of him when he had the fight with Claiborne for which the
latter may have been sucked into by the Sullivans. His feud with the
Sullivans is in the best tradition of Boston social culture of which
the current saying that vendettas and politics make Boston go.
Do not read the Monday column without trying to get the Saturday column
for the two go together. 9 out of 10 McDonough opinions tend to be
worthless but that doesn't stop him.
|
56.2339 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 13:40 | 9 |
| According to ImJimbo it was actually a good pick football wise because Peter
is big and an animal but from a character standpoint and from answering to
your wife it was bad.........
I really avoid watching Nebraska games so I can't really give a fair evaluation
of his football talent but given IMJIMBO's sterling reputation, I'd say we
could take it as gospel that Peter is a very good football player.........
;^)
|
56.2340 | Husker version on Peter? | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:38 | 9 |
| I was not aware of Peter Christian's latest crime at the end of the
season which involved direct violence upon a woman. Given his past
record this was inexcusable. It would point to an alcohol problem
except if no substance abuse is indicated then I would call it
mental illness.
Parcell's supposedly talked to Osborne - I wonder if it was before the
latest incident. Since there's so much slant one way on this I'd be
curious to see Husker Henderson's version.
|
56.2341 | Franchise in disarray | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:57 | 8 |
|
Well, between the bait-and-switch pulled off by the Raiders on the draft
pick for Harlow, the front-office split on Terry Glenn, and now the
completely inexcusable squandering of a 5th-round pick, one would
think the Sullivans are still in the building...
glenn
|
56.2342 | Sportszone article on Peters | HBAHBA::HAAS | floor,chair,couch,bed | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:58 | 56 |
| _________________________________________________________________
ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
PATS CUT DRAFT PICK, CITING HIS VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
_________________________________________________________________
FOXBORO, Mass. -- The New England Patriots, citing Christian Peter's
history of violence against women, released the fifth-round draft pick
on Wednesday.
"Unfortunately, we did not have complete information regarding
Christian Peter's record at the time we made our draft selection,"
said Bobby Grier, Patriots director of player personnel.
Peter, 6-foot-3 and 304 pounds, started the past two seasons at
defensive tackle for Nebraska's back-to-back national champions.
His former teammate, running back Lawrence Phillips, is on one year of
probation after pleading no contest in an attack on a former
girlfriend last fall. The St. Louis Rams took Phillips last weekend
with the sixth overall pick in the draft.
Peter recently was convicted of disturbing the peace in an incident in
which he was accused of grabbing a woman by the throat at a Kearney,
Neb., bar following a booster club banquet March 6.
In May 1994, Peter pleaded guilty to third-degree assault of a former
Miss Nebraska. He served 18 months probation, which expired in early
January.
"Based on information we obtained in the last 48 hours following a
review of his past actions, we concluded his behavior is incompatible
with our organization's standards of acceptable conduct," Grier said.
Peter also has been arrested on suspicion of disturbing the peace,
trespassing, urinating in public, refusing to comply with the order of
a policeman and third-degree assault for threatening to kill a parking
attendant.
The Patriots' claim that they were unaware of Peter's criminal record,
despite extensive information available to all NFL teams on draft
prospects.
Players perform in scouting combines, where they receive psychological
evaluations. In addition, the NFL's security division investigates top
college players, and that information also is passed on to clubs.
A Sports Illustrated article in the March 18 issue also reported on
Peter's criminal record.
_________________________________________________________________
|
56.2343 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 15:01 | 4 |
|
What BS is Grier trying to pull off? If we knew about his record you can bet
your butt they knew too. They tried to pull a fast one but Mrs. Kraft and the
public got on them and they changed their minds.........
|
56.2344 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Apr 25 1996 15:57 | 4 |
|
You mean the Pats upper echelon don't read ::sports?
Claybone
|
56.2345 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Apr 25 1996 16:35 | 7 |
| > You mean the Pats upper echelon don't read ::sports?
If not, it would explain their problems.
billl
|
56.2346 | Steelers could benefit from this note, too | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 25 1996 16:38 | 1 |
|
|
56.2347 | Parcells on the way out? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed May 01 1996 10:58 | 8 |
| And meanwhile, what's this about Parcells leaving after this season?
The reports are that he had his contract restructured so he could get out
early. I guess all in not well in the love fest we call the Pats.
Evidently, Parcells and Kraft agreed to disagree and Bill is gonna walk.
TTom
|
56.2348 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed May 01 1996 11:16 | 21 |
|
The restructuring came about at Bill's request *after* last year's
dismal 6-10 record and *before* the hiring of Bellichek.
So this has nothing to do with recent disagreements around draft
picks. Probably more to do with Bill's disappointment last year.
That's what happens when you don't have someone else making GM
decisions for ya.
The Providence Journal has been reporting bad vibes and a general
feeling that Bill had 1 (if not less) more year here for a while.
The Boston press is just gettin' on the bandwagon (probably because
they have such a love affair with BP).
Personally, I'm glad someone cut back BP's power. He wasn't making
good choices, and if he's p.o.'d about any loss of power by the
overrides he had to sustain in this draft, well, I guess he doesn't
practice what he preaches about toughening things out. He has
seriously damaged a team with potential by making bad GM moves.
- Sean
|
56.2349 | he ain't no offense guy... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu May 02 1996 17:11 | 2 |
| I read that he didn't like the Glenn pick. Of course, he didn't like
the Hampton pick when he was with the Giants, either.
|
56.2350 | Parcells' opinion of Glenn almost irrelavant | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri May 03 1996 17:46 | 13 |
|
> Of course, he didn't like the Hampton pick when he was with the
> Giants, either.
...nor the Meggett pick, which he absolutely hated, but that didn't
stop Proud Bill from falling in love with the guy, to the extent that
he'd then overpay him once past his prime...
As far as I'm concerned, if Parcells doesn't like a draft pick, it
can only be a bonus (even a motivator) going in...
glenn
|
56.2351 | another black eye | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:58 | 6 |
| Lost in the shuffle:
Y'all got another goodun, eh? Your firsted pick, Terry Glenn, has been
busted. Something about driving and wrecking without a license.
TTom
|
56.2352 | No liquor involved though | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:04 | 6 |
| Yeah the ex-Ohio St player get's busted for driving with a suspended
license and failure to control his car. Rolled over his new car
(Mercedes I think) doing 60 in a 35 mph zone. Terry the Pats want you
to be a deep threat like Irving Fryar not a driving threat like Irving.
mike
|
56.2353 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:52 | 9 |
|
Irving Cha Ching
Hart Lee Cha Ching
Glenn Cha Ching
|
56.2354 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Jul 09 1996 15:32 | 8 |
| >Something about driving and wrecking without a license.
Can you drive and wreck if you *do* have a license?
If so, I'd love to see the criteria for granting them... :-)
Yup, WAAF this morning was mentioning Terry Glenn as the latest attendee
of the Irving Fryar Driving Academy.
|
56.2355 | kinda | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 09 1996 15:37 | 1 |
| Wail, insurance is sorta like a license to wreck.
|
56.2356 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Tue Jul 09 1996 15:58 | 4 |
| Well since Irving left Car insurance has gone down for Ma. drivers.
Will this mean they'll head back up?
Mike
|
56.2357 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:40 | 11 |
|
Terry Glenn's lawyer/agent is PO'ed at the state of Ohio. Apparantly
Terry Glenn lost his Ohio license, since he lives in Florida he applied
and received a Florida license. Then when he went back to Ohio, they
issued him a new Ohio license. So in the last 60 days he has been
issued TWO licenses. Then he gets in a little car accident and gets
busted for a suspended license. His license has been suspended since
1993. So the Ohio Registry broke there own laws and issued a new
license to someone, while there license was suspended.
Ron
|
56.2358 | sounds 'bout right | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:43 | 3 |
| Whatta ya expect outta Ohio?
TTom
|
56.2359 | pre-season,regular season, post-season a Dallas loss is a good thing | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Aug 13 1996 07:40 | 19 |
|
31-7 Pats trounce da Pokes last night in Dallas. I know it was a
pre-season game and Emmitt wasn't playin but the Pats did execute well
and their defense looked pretty good against da boy's starters. Peon
Deion was a non-factor, gotta love him looking for a flag after him
and Ty Law go down. Speaking of Law I'm still looking for the FIRST
pass interference call on him, second one was a no brainer but the
first was incidental contact and he got robbed. Curtis looked good
last night actually had some holes to run through. Devin Wyman had
another pass deflection last night and also played the run pretty well.
He looks like the steal of the draft so far. Teddy Brushci (sp) also
looked pretty good but is still learning to play linebacker after
playing a down lineman in college. They Pats where pretty sloppy
though had about 100+ yards in penalties. Even with a win I know Tuna
was screamin with that stat. 31-7 see ya in Dec.
Jerry
|
56.2360 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Aug 13 1996 09:10 | 7 |
| Bledsoe will never become a deep passer, it's missing in his football
makeup. It's like Clemens trying to learn to throw a knuckleball. No
matter what he tries to do he can't master the trick of having the ball
drop down at the end of 55-60 yards.
Pretty much totally meaningless except better than having the score
reversed.
|
56.2361 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Aug 13 1996 09:35 | 13 |
|
Loved it when da refs threw the red instant-replay hanky back in
Barry's face which elicited the response of "bullshit!". Granted
the play did look like one of those no-way-he-made-it impossible
grabs, but sure enough the replay showed that the receiver just
as likely did pull off the impossible as didn't, and da refs were
vindicated. Apparently an overruling of calls like these based on
the Special League Policy for Cowboys (Mr. Carver, your suspension
is hereby reduced) will wait for the league's inception of this
(good) system for meaningful, regular-season games only.
glenn
|
56.2362 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Aug 13 1996 09:39 | 10 |
|
In other news, The Tuna has already pretty well placed the "Big Dog"
tag on Terry Glenn, huh? Or at least he's disappointed and is
questioning Glenn's toughness with the usual statements like "we'll
see which guys can play hurt and which can't". It's a motivational
ploy, but it sure didn't take long to see it used against the player
Parcells allegedly supposedly reportedly didn't want in the first place.
glenn
|
56.2363 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Aug 13 1996 11:23 | 20 |
56.2363 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Wed Sep 04 1996 10:37 | 18 |
|
The year the Pats drafted Bledsoe I wanted them to take
Marvin Jones instead. Three years later I wish that it was
Marvin Jones I coud be watching instead of Drew. And it isn't
just because of Drew's dumb and dumber mistakes. Or that he
does his Tony (Eason) The Turtle routine whenever he feels
pressure. The kid has no fire. I want to see him get in some-
body's face. I want to see him show that he's sportin' more
than a pair of grape seeds. It's bad enough that you have to
cringe whenever he throws into coverage or locks on to a re-
ceiver but he's so damned dull that the only thing that can
keep you awake when he's on the field is the suspense of when
he'll do something completely stupid. And this move of Tuna's
to not list Zolak on his game day roster seems designed to el-
iminate any possibility of a QB controversy when what Drew really
needs is a swiift kick in the butt not to be babied. Drew has the
physicals but it remains to be seen whether Tuna can give him
the mentals. The jury is still out.
|
56.2364 | have to anyone since they have no secondary | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Sep 12 1996 11:41 | 4 |
| Word from the Cards' coaching staff is that they believe Bledsoe has
developed "happy feet" and plan on sending the defense after him.
Mike
|
56.2365 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Sep 12 1996 11:49 | 1 |
| Anesas Williams ought to get 3 picks this week I figure............
|
56.2366 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Sep 12 1996 12:01 | 3 |
| What are "happy feet"?
George
|
56.2367 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 12 1996 12:05 | 19 |
| >
> What are "happy feet"?
>
> George
It's a term used in football to denote a quarterback who gets nervous in the
pocket -- usually because his offensive line hasn't been blocking too well and
he's getting sacked a lot.
A QB with happy feet will tend to leave the pocket and scramble a lot quicker
than you'd like him to.
'Course, with Bledsoe, he ain't much of a scrambler....
'Saw
|
56.2368 | INTs | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 12 1996 12:26 | 11 |
| Scrambling is just one of the symptoms of happy feet. Throwing early is
another. Then there's the technique where you're so worried about the
pass rush that you don't set you feet properly for the throw. The
symptom for this is that the pass is underthrown, often leading to
a_interception.
Under the dicitionary, if'n you look up happy feet they'll show you
Chrissie Everett, currently with the Saints. The Painters successfully
exploited this to rally and win lasted Sunday.
TTom
|
56.2369 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Sep 12 1996 12:32 | 2 |
| Naw, everyone is afraid to throw to Aeneas. Everyone always throws at
the opposite cornerback.
|
56.2370 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Thu Sep 12 1996 12:34 | 9 |
|
>> Word from the Cards' coaching staff is that they believe Bledsoe has
>> developed "happy feet"
He exhibited that tendency more than once last Sunday against
Buffalo. His confidence seems to be at a low ebb. Hopefully, the
Cardinals can help cure that because if we lose this weekend the
season is essentially over.
|
56.2371 | Ray Perkins is the route of all evil in New Engalnd | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:10 | 12 |
|
If the Cards send their D at Bledsoe they'll loose. He has happy
feet and I don't think he playes well under a heavy rush but the Card
front 7 is not as good as the Bills and Armstrong is bound to play a
lot better than he did againts Bruce Smith which will make for a long
day for the Card secondary. If they send the kitched sink at Drew and
Tuna wakes up and lets the kid do his thing the Pats will win by 30.
If Tuna pulls back on the reigns they'll only win by 10 or so. Simple
fact is the Cards are worse off offensively than the Pats.
Jerry
|
56.2372 | | NQOS01::nqsrv142.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:38 | 6 |
|
Cards front 7 is pretty good. It's the only good part of the team. And it's
not that the teams want to stay away from Aneas, it's that the other CB is
soooooo bad.
brews
|
56.2373 | IMO | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:51 | 6 |
| re: Armstrong vs Bruce Smith
At this point in their careers, I'd think that Eric Swann wouldn't be
considered a_easier DL to handle than Smith.
TTom
|
56.2374 | Oh no, I have happy feet! | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:55 | 7 |
| >
> What are "happy feet"?
>
> George
I think that the wild-and-crazy-guy Steve Martin had them as well.
|
56.2375 | and another | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:57 | 6 |
| > I think that the wild-and-crazy-guy Steve Martin had them as well.
I caught _Baron Munchausen_ yesterday. Eric Idle definitely had happy
feet.
TTom
|
56.2376 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Sep 12 1996 16:35 | 4 |
| yeah as Brews said, the Cards front 7 are probably the most talented
group on the team: Eric Swann, Michael Bankston, Simeon Rice, Seth
Joyner, Eric Hill, Jamir Miller. The secondary sips outside of Aeneas.
the other side of the ball sips outside of Larry Centers.
|
56.2377 | Cob webeth be clearing | MFGFIN::JACKSON | The time is near | Thu Sep 12 1996 23:47 | 15 |
| RE- What are happy feet?
That reminds me of an episode of WKRP of Cinncy. One of Carlson's
new employees brings in some cocaine, and Carlson gets ahold of it and
puts it on his feet thinking its foot power. His feet went knumb and
he goes crazy stomping his feet thinking something is wrong with his
feet and then Andy comes in and found out what he had done and starts
crackin up.
Andy tells him its cocaine and Carlson freaks thinking he will become
an addict.
I was rollin,
Tim
|
56.2378 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Fri Sep 13 1996 06:37 | 9 |
56.2379 | Elway > Bledsoe | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Sep 13 1996 09:18 | 5 |
56.2380 | as good but not with as good | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:00 | 12 |
56.2381 | WKRP was a really good show | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Two months to Maui - Go UMass! | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:29 | 5 |
56.2382 | | SALEM::DODA | Searching for the next distraction | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:36 | 4 |
56.2383 | barring injury | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:51 | 10 |
56.2384 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Mon Sep 16 1996 14:34 | 5 |
56.2385 | | NQOS01::nqsrv237.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Sep 16 1996 20:40 | 4 |
56.2386 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Tue Sep 17 1996 10:32 | 10 |
56.2387 | | SMART2::CHILDS | | Mon Sep 23 1996 14:57 | 2 |
56.2388 | | NQOS01::nqsrv323.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Sep 23 1996 15:02 | 4 |
56.2389 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Mon Sep 23 1996 15:11 | 1 |
56.2390 | | SMART2::CHILDS | | Mon Sep 23 1996 15:17 | 1 |
56.2391 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Mon Sep 23 1996 15:26 | 7 |
56.2392 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Sep 23 1996 15:56 | 15 |
56.2393 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Sep 23 1996 16:00 | 25 |
56.2394 | | NQOS01::nqsrv211.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Sep 23 1996 16:02 | 5 |
56.2395 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Sep 24 1996 09:51 | 11 |
56.2396 | Coates is over-rated | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Sep 24 1996 12:33 | 2 |
56.2397 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Sep 24 1996 12:46 | 15 |
56.2398 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Tue Sep 24 1996 12:55 | 8 |
56.2399 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Sep 24 1996 13:04 | 3 |
56.2400 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Sep 24 1996 14:39 | 5 |
56.2401 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Sep 24 1996 14:42 | 9 |
56.2402 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:25 | 10 |
56.2403 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:42 | 6 |
56.2404 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Sep 25 1996 13:22 | 8 |
56.2405 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 26 1996 09:40 | 5 |
56.2406 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Thu Sep 26 1996 09:53 | 10 |
56.2407 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 26 1996 09:57 | 4 |
56.2408 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Sep 26 1996 10:58 | 4 |
56.2409 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Thu Sep 26 1996 11:06 | 3 |
56.2410 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Sep 26 1996 11:34 | 1 |
56.2411 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 26 1996 11:46 | 5 |
56.2412 | I'm holding out for the Dave Brown jersey myself... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 26 1996 11:50 | 7 |
56.2413 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Thu Sep 26 1996 12:03 | 3 |
56.2414 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Fri Sep 27 1996 14:14 | 8 |
56.2415 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 27 1996 14:22 | 1 |
56.2416 | He took it way too personally... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:53 | 9 |
56.2417 | Hope the amazing play of the last two games is for real | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 08 1996 10:36 | 7 |
56.2418 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 08 1996 11:27 | 3 |
56.2419 | Whoever gave Tommy that Pname is cruel | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Oct 08 1996 12:45 | 8 |
56.2420 | Doesn't make him a bad player; we're talking mindset | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 08 1996 13:47 | 10 |
56.2421 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Tue Oct 08 1996 13:54 | 10 |
56.2422 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Oct 08 1996 16:17 | 9 |
56.2423 | There hasn't been a real "strategy" with Parcells | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 08 1996 16:26 | 15 |
56.2424 | TRADE?? | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Thu Oct 10 1996 02:39 | 8 |
56.2425 | You're absolutely right Rich | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Thu Oct 10 1996 04:18 | 5 |
56.2426 | The Browns have no team history. | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The torture never stops... | Thu Oct 10 1996 06:53 | 7 |
56.2427 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 11:33 | 5 |
56.2428 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | I need a favor, Don Cornelius... | Thu Oct 10 1996 12:07 | 4 |
56.2429 | Any tird will do. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 10 1996 12:26 | 2 |
56.2430 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 13:32 | 2 |
56.2431 | | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 10 1996 14:12 | 1 |
56.2432 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Oct 10 1996 14:18 | 10 |
56.2433 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 14:46 | 2 |
56.2434 | Thanks for the KOD Jimbo :>) | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 10 1996 14:47 | 2 |
56.2435 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Thu Oct 10 1996 14:55 | 8 |
56.2436 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:22 | 6 |
56.2437 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:25 | 2 |
56.2438 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:27 | 4 |
56.2439 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:28 | 5 |
56.2440 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:29 | 4 |
56.2441 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:39 | 10 |
56.2442 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:59 | 4 |
56.2443 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Nov 04 1996 13:44 | 3 |
56.2444 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Burn Tempe to the Ground | Wed Nov 06 1996 08:00 | 7 |
56.2445 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Nov 06 1996 08:47 | 6 |
56.2446 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Nov 06 1996 09:10 | 6 |
56.2447 | | BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-238.tay.dec.com::LongW | taxation without representation | Wed Nov 06 1996 13:24 | 7 |
56.2448 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Nov 06 1996 13:39 | 3 |
56.2449 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Burn Tempe to the Ground | Wed Nov 06 1996 13:53 | 16 |
56.2450 | | NQOS01::nqsrv227.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Thu Nov 07 1996 18:02 | 8 |
56.2451 | You exaggerate... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Burn Tempe to the Ground | Fri Nov 08 1996 08:30 | 10 |
56.2452 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Fri Nov 08 1996 09:31 | 10 |
56.2453 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:14 | 11 |
56.2454 | 10 or 11 | HBAHBA::HAAS | but the reply came from Anchorage | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:17 | 9 |
56.2455 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:39 | 2 |
56.2456 | way to go! | HBAHBA::HAAS | but the reply came from Anchorage | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:44 | 9 |
56.2457 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Nov 08 1996 10:50 | 3 |
56.2458 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongW | taxation without representation | Mon Nov 25 1996 12:34 | 8 |
56.2459 | Packer Fan In Disguise | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Nov 25 1996 12:58 | 1 |
56.2460 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Nov 25 1996 13:31 | 2 |
56.2461 | unless of course you care to duck....... | CNTROL::CHILDS | | Fri Dec 06 1996 09:44 | 6 |
56.2462 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Fri Dec 06 1996 12:20 | 5 |
56.2463 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | | Fri Dec 06 1996 12:30 | 2 |
56.2464 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Dec 06 1996 12:53 | 7 |
56.2465 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:06 | 22 |
56.2466 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:16 | 2 |
56.2467 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:49 | 10 |
56.2468 | Nice Spit wad from Sinbad in the First Kid | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:24 | 10 |
56.2469 | Drew didn't step up in a big game - again | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruiserball! | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:27 | 3 |
56.2470 | Huh? | 2975::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:32 | 12 |
56.2471 | Got to be important to players, not fans | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:48 | 10 |
56.2472 | | 2975::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:53 | 16 |
56.2473 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Mon Dec 16 1996 12:07 | 16 |
56.2474 | just wait til nexted year | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 16 1996 12:16 | 4 |
56.2475 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Dec 20 1996 10:04 | 9 |
56.2476 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Fri Dec 20 1996 10:12 | 2 |
56.2477 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Dec 20 1996 14:28 | 4 |
56.2478 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Dec 20 1996 14:43 | 1 |
56.2479 | Ok I said the same about Holyfield | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Fri Dec 20 1996 14:59 | 7 |
56.2480 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 23 1996 13:49 | 11 |
56.2481 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 09:29 | 10 |
56.2482 | getting technical? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 09:43 | 5 |
56.2483 | and I don't delete my old posts... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:00 | 13 |
56.2484 | I'm pumped-- let's get it on! | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:05 | 20 |
56.2485 | 'course they did say BUTTS on the back... | SALEM::DODA | How could we know that promises end? | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:09 | 9 |
56.2486 | It's not just football-- it's Steelers' football | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:15 | 17 |
56.2487 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:41 | 7 |
56.2488 | plenty of Coates shirts available, too | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:43 | 15 |
56.2489 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:46 | 5 |
56.2490 | SLEEPER HOLD! | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:50 | 1 |
56.2491 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 10:53 | 20 |
56.2492 | and bars | CNTROL::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 12:32 | 5 |
56.2493 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 12:39 | 2 |
56.2494 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Dec 30 1996 12:44 | 8 |
56.2495 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 13:39 | 7 |
56.2496 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 13:53 | 6 |
56.2497 | some summary | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:07 | 7 |
56.2498 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:08 | 2 |
56.2499 | way back when | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:16 | 6 |
56.2500 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:31 | 6 |
56.2501 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:31 | 13 |
56.2502 | rooting for ever body | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:51 | 26 |
56.2503 | Back a the bus... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Mon Dec 30 1996 14:58 | 13 |
56.2504 | keep on movin on | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 15:02 | 16 |
56.2505 | Just Plain Nasty | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Mon Dec 30 1996 15:12 | 20 |
56.2506 | won't have both of 'em | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 15:16 | 9 |
56.2507 | man gettin in here late sucks | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Dec 30 1996 17:30 | 4 |
56.2508 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:14 | 7 |
56.2509 | nothing more, nothing less | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:42 | 7 |
56.2510 | the key matchups... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:45 | 9 |
56.2511 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:52 | 5 |
56.2512 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:08 | 3 |
56.2513 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:18 | 8 |
56.2514 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:24 | 5 |
56.2515 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:27 | 12 |
56.2516 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:28 | 33 |
56.2517 | RE: .2515 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Dec 31 1996 11:17 | 2 |
56.2518 | I'll say | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 02 1997 14:35 | 7 |
56.2519 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Thu Jan 02 1997 14:58 | 8 |
56.2520 | Oh Yeah! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Jan 05 1997 14:13 | 6 |
56.2521 | what a beating... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 06 1997 08:55 | 15 |
56.2522 | One scared Pats fan | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:14 | 12 |
56.2523 | last team with the ball wins... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:49 | 13 |
56.2524 | re: dark side | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:58 | 4 |
56.2525 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:16 | 11 |
56.2526 | Go Pats! | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:25 | 2 |
56.2527 | what kind of reasoning is that? | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:41 | 4 |
56.2528 | I shall be released | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:51 | 10 |
56.2529 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:06 | 2 |
56.2530 | jumping on ever bandwagon | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:19 | 8 |
56.2531 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:50 | 18 |
56.2532 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:28 | 3 |
56.2533 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:38 | 8 |
56.2534 | a little low | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:41 | 13 |
56.2535 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:42 | 1 |
56.2536 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:56 | 23 |
56.2537 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:19 | 12 |
56.2538 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:26 | 14 |
56.2539 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:27 | 8 |
56.2540 | why switch now | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:31 | 5 |
56.2541 | the lasted time | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:36 | 160 |
56.2542 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 14:09 | 13 |
56.2543 | keep them overs coming | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 14:13 | 0 |
56.2544 | and no I was not in line | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Tue Jan 07 1997 08:12 | 12 |
56.2545 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 07 1997 10:05 | 4 |
56.2546 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Tue Jan 07 1997 10:28 | 17 |
56.2547 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 07 1997 19:17 | 3 |
56.2548 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 07 1997 19:32 | 3 |
56.2549 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:20 | 4 |
56.2550 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:27 | 2 |
56.2551 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:32 | 5 |
56.2552 | Lets Hope He Stays | BRAT::FORTIN_C | Where's the Spirit, Where's the Guts | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:38 | 6 |
56.2553 | what the hail? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:07 | 9 |
56.2554 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:13 | 15 |
56.2555 | what's this all about? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:32 | 110 |
56.2556 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:41 | 3 |
56.2557 | CNN story | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:51 | 90 |
56.2558 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:13 | 24 |
56.2559 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:14 | 7 |
56.2560 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:17 | 12 |
56.2561 | big boss days numbered? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:18 | 17 |
56.2562 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:21 | 5 |
56.2563 | Definitely not 'boys fans-- far too thuggish | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:22 | 15 |
56.2564 | all this fuss over tickets to a loss | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:31 | 4 |
56.2565 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:02 | 23 |
56.2566 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:07 | 10 |
56.2567 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:09 | 19 |
56.2568 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:15 | 8 |
56.2569 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:19 | 12 |
56.2570 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:56 | 3 |
56.2571 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:58 | 9 |
56.2572 | Best jab at Boston so far! :^) | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Wed Jan 08 1997 12:41 | 139 |
56.2573 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Wed Jan 08 1997 12:53 | 5 |
56.2574 | another vote for TF Green | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Wed Jan 08 1997 13:41 | 16 |
56.2575 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 13:59 | 5 |
56.2576 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Wed Jan 08 1997 14:49 | 6 |
56.2577 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 08 1997 15:15 | 8 |
56.2578 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Jan 08 1997 15:26 | 5 |
56.2579 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:02 | 4 |
56.2580 | But that was it-- the rest was fun, I loved it... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:02 | 11 |
56.2581 | It ain't that bad... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:15 | 17 |
56.2582 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:24 | 8 |
56.2583 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:25 | 11 |
56.2584 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:28 | 5 |
56.2585 | It's fun being a moron | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:30 | 13 |
56.2586 | Bad winners, try some softball teams | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 16:35 | 14 |
56.2587 | singing in the rain | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 08 1997 17:29 | 5 |
56.2588 | IT'S DESERVED | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Wed Jan 08 1997 23:04 | 7 |
56.2589 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Jan 09 1997 08:06 | 11 |
56.2590 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Thu Jan 09 1997 08:14 | 13 |
56.2591 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Thu Jan 09 1997 09:03 | 13 |
56.2592 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jan 09 1997 09:17 | 8 |
56.2593 | the Slimfast was Spiked! | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 09 1997 09:29 | 3 |
56.2594 | Stuff happens | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:34 | 10 |
56.2595 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:41 | 6 |
56.2596 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:47 | 1 |
56.2597 | alcohol and testostorne are one nasty mixture! | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:52 | 13 |
56.2598 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:53 | 1 |
56.2599 | ex | FRSBEE::GROVES | | Thu Jan 09 1997 10:53 | 20 |
56.2600 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Thu Jan 09 1997 11:01 | 15 |
56.2601 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 09 1997 11:27 | 2 |
56.2602 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Thu Jan 09 1997 12:43 | 13 |
56.2603 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Jan 09 1997 13:14 | 6 |
56.2604 | reality is something else | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Thu Jan 09 1997 13:43 | 6 |
56.2605 | 4 hours ? | FRSBEE::GROVES | | Thu Jan 09 1997 14:42 | 10 |
56.2606 | | SCAMP::FORTIN_C | Where's the Spirit, Where's the Guts | Thu Jan 09 1997 14:52 | 3 |
56.2607 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Thu Jan 09 1997 14:59 | 20 |
56.2608 | Let's get them all out | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Mon Jan 13 1997 07:58 | 7 |
56.2609 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 13 1997 08:56 | 8 |
56.2610 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Jan 13 1997 09:18 | 4 |
56.2611 | CRUSH THEM PATSIES!!!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Mon Jan 13 1997 09:27 | 7 |
56.2612 | X-files material? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's around here somewhere | Mon Jan 13 1997 09:35 | 16 |
56.2613 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 13 1997 10:02 | 7 |
56.2614 | Mikey the HLO legend!!!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Mon Jan 13 1997 10:10 | 10 |
56.2615 | had carolina yesterday........ | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:08 | 0 |
56.2616 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:14 | 9 |
56.2617 | GO PACK!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:16 | 5 |
56.2618 | way to go | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:20 | 3 |
56.2619 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:26 | 7 |
56.2620 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:38 | 10 |
56.2621 | gotta do better | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:42 | 16 |
56.2622 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:44 | 9 |
56.2623 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:48 | 10 |
56.2624 | dome teams are bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Mon Jan 13 1997 11:48 | 8 |
56.2625 | just the messenger... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Mon Jan 13 1997 12:41 | 109 |
56.2626 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:04 | 8 |
56.2627 | pats 28, packers 21 | ALASKA::LAFOSSE | WHEN THE BULLET HITS THE BONE... | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:09 | 8 |
56.2628 | Get the boys going | WILLEE::MAILLOUX | | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:28 | 7 |
56.2629 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:28 | 19 |
56.2630 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:29 | 6 |
56.2631 | Huh??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:32 | 11 |
56.2632 | One-Two Punch | PCBUOA::EHS | | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:43 | 3 |
56.2633 | Not Enough Output, I Suppose | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 13:51 | 10 |
56.2634 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:00 | 6 |
56.2635 | Pats 31-GB 27... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:11 | 10 |
56.2636 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:15 | 3 |
56.2637 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:17 | 6 |
56.2638 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:19 | 5 |
56.2639 | | NQOS01::nqsrv212.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Pee Wee Herman's bodydouble | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:42 | 2 |
56.2640 | easy over | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Mon Jan 13 1997 14:45 | 10 |
56.2641 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:27 | 2 |
56.2642 | Not Sure | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:42 | 14 |
56.2643 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:42 | 2 |
56.2644 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:47 | 2 |
56.2645 | Not True | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:52 | 1 |
56.2646 | just a coincidence :^) | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 13 1997 16:09 | 7 |
56.2647 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:15 | 11 |
56.2648 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:23 | 2 |
56.2649 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:39 | 3 |
56.2650 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:43 | 6 |
56.2651 | More Nits | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 18:58 | 4 |
56.2652 | | NQOS01::nqsrv210.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Pee Wee Herman's bodydouble | Mon Jan 13 1997 20:31 | 4 |
56.2653 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 08:49 | 7 |
56.2654 | I'm sure he's got extra duct tape for his ankles | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Tue Jan 14 1997 08:51 | 5 |
56.2655 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 14 1997 09:01 | 10 |
56.2656 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1997 09:21 | 8 |
56.2657 | Say It Isn't So! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 09:36 | 4 |
56.2658 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 14 1997 12:13 | 8 |
56.2659 | It had to be said | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 14 1997 12:16 | 4 |
56.2660 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 14 1997 12:35 | 6 |
56.2661 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 14 1997 12:36 | 5 |
56.2662 | Stirring Things Up | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 13:29 | 19 |
56.2663 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Jan 14 1997 14:06 | 3 |
56.2664 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 14 1997 14:44 | 21 |
56.2665 | Lies, Lies, and More Lies From Tommy "Big Nose" Brydie!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 15:07 | 37 |
56.2666 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Tue Jan 14 1997 15:14 | 14 |
56.2667 | I Agree | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:02 | 4 |
56.2668 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:10 | 22 |
56.2669 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:12 | 15 |
56.2670 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:41 | 17 |
56.2671 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:56 | 28 |
56.2672 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 14 1997 16:56 | 6 |
56.2673 | Still A Fine Defense Tho | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 17:35 | 8 |
56.2674 | Good Note | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 17:36 | 3 |
56.2675 | how to stop a pass attack by Bill Parcells | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 14 1997 19:29 | 16 |
56.2676 | Misc. | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 19:48 | 12 |
56.2677 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 14 1997 21:06 | 2 |
56.2678 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 09:29 | 13 |
56.2679 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Wed Jan 15 1997 09:59 | 2 |
56.2680 | Packers all the way!!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:02 | 9 |
56.2681 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:07 | 11 |
56.2682 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:13 | 1 |
56.2683 | 7 points Mike, how early is it out there?? | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:18 | 1 |
56.2684 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Wed Jan 15 1997 10:35 | 2 |
56.2685 | Which Is It??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:18 | 10 |
56.2686 | Even The QB Matchup, Huh??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:20 | 7 |
56.2687 | Take the bait; it's fun | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:22 | 10 |
56.2688 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:39 | 17 |
56.2689 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:42 | 9 |
56.2690 | it is fun, though | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:44 | 7 |
56.2691 | He's back, to the benefit of the Pack | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:54 | 25 |
56.2692 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:56 | 9 |
56.2693 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:56 | 10 |
56.2694 | Shut up Chappy... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:57 | 1 |
56.2695 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:57 | 12 |
56.2696 | Nice down payment | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Wed Jan 15 1997 11:58 | 10 |
56.2697 | domed games give them problems | SALEM::DODA | One World within.... | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:04 | 5 |
56.2698 | those 70s monday night football games | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:07 | 9 |
56.2699 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:19 | 22 |
56.2700 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:30 | 8 |
56.2701 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:46 | 3 |
56.2702 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:08 | 6 |
56.2703 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:08 | 11 |
56.2704 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:10 | 10 |
56.2705 | Where Illogic Reigns | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:15 | 13 |
56.2706 | Misc. | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:25 | 29 |
56.2707 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:34 | 7 |
56.2708 | More Misc. | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:36 | 9 |
56.2709 | THE MIGHTY 'GREEN BAY PRESS GAZETTE'!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:38 | 4 |
56.2710 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:38 | 5 |
56.2711 | of course | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:38 | 1 |
56.2712 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:38 | 8 |
56.2713 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:43 | 12 |
56.2714 | covering all bases, eh? | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:50 | 12 |
56.2715 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 13:59 | 3 |
56.2716 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:00 | 7 |
56.2717 | Can't have one without the other | IMINMK::SILVESTRI | Penuts Gang turns 10 in 1997! | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:01 | 30 |
56.2718 | Bang Bang | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:06 | 6 |
56.2719 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:22 | 15 |
56.2720 | never bet with your heart | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:38 | 6 |
56.2721 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 15 1997 14:41 | 14 |
56.2722 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 15 1997 16:44 | 8 |
56.2723 | Fassell no longer avail. | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 15 1997 17:05 | 6 |
56.2724 | Can you say...."sacrificial lamb"??? | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Wed Jan 15 1997 22:46 | 13 |
56.2726 | Steelers lose by 50 | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Thu Jan 16 1997 07:22 | 12 |
56.2727 | New England 35 greeen bay 31 | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The torture never stops... | Thu Jan 16 1997 07:39 | 18 |
56.2728 | Need a p-name, DJ? | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 16 1997 09:20 | 17 |
56.2729 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Jan 16 1997 09:28 | 8 |
56.2730 | When it's the last game of the year | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 17 1997 13:39 | 62 |
56.2731 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 17 1997 14:01 | 2 |
56.2732 | Tuna Trivia | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 17 1997 14:26 | 8 |
56.2733 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 17 1997 15:01 | 5 |
56.2734 | | NQOS01::nqsrv244.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Pee Wee Herman's bodydouble | Sat Jan 18 1997 23:58 | 11 |
56.2735 | One Was Pretty Lucky (imo) | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Jan 19 1997 11:42 | 8 |
56.2736 | nice timing, eh? | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Mon Jan 20 1997 08:14 | 7 |
56.2737 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 20 1997 08:54 | 8 |
56.2738 | contents are the opinion of the sender not the poster | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Sun Jan 26 1997 23:53 | 28 |
| One of ya cain post this mail in SPROTS, if'n ya will.
Gawd I loved this Super Bowl, except for the 5 minutes or so the Pats
actually tried to make a game of it.
Bledsoe showed how mediocre a QB he really is. Pressure him and he'll
put it up fer grabs. (Not that anybody the STEELERS have right now is
any better.)
Curtis Martin was a malingerer at Pitt, and I was glad he didn't get a
ring with the Pats.
Hey, the rumor is that Parcells is gone from the Pats. I hear Bruce
Kotite is willing to pay to get the Pats coaching job.(8^)*
Oh well, like 28 other teams fans are saying, and have been saying for
a while, there's always nexted year, huh?? HAHAHAHAHA!!
I normally root for the AFC team, but I couldn't stand the thought of
such a lousy team, who caught the STEELERS on the occasional down day,
possibly winning the big game.
Later
JaKe
|
56.2739 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Sun Jan 26 1997 23:59 | 14 |
| I really though the Pats had a chance until the Peon-wannabe,
Desmond Howard ran that kickoff back. That was the final
straw that seemed to take all the wind out of the sails of
the Pats.
All in all a good game, but it'll unfortunately be remembered
as just one more NFC win.
I imagine it'll be kinda quiet in here tomorrow. I'll check
in as much as I can. The wifey is in the hospital so I'll be
working from home for the nexted few days.
billl
|
56.2740 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 27 1997 08:45 | 15 |
| 2222
222 222
222 222
222 222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222222222222222
222222222222222
|
56.2741 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 27 1997 08:48 | 15 |
| First the Braves, now the Pats. Two is getting to be a familiar number.
Well said about that final run back. Even then the Pats had the ball down
two touchdowns with plenty of time left on the clock. They could have gone
down the field for a score, got the ball back and run it in again in Heidi
game style but somehow their 5 man offensive line that had given Bledsoe good
protection earlier in the game couldn't hold back a 3 man rush.
Then the got the ball back again within the 2 minute warning and same thing.
Still when you figure in what people were saying at the start of the season
and even what some people were saying with 3-4 weeks to go, an A.F.C. title
isn't bad. I know I'm going to go hunt up a cap.
George
|
56.2742 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:29 | 26 |
|
some opinions:
1) Obviously the back-breaker was the Howard return, but the real
problem was the defensive backfield getting toasted deep to a
nice golden brown. The Packers couldn't run, but discovered after
a while that they didn't have to.
2) Desmond Howard was a jerk, is a jerk, and always will be a jerk.
3) The Packers winning doesn't bother me, because it means Reggie White
gets a ring. Unfortunately, it also means Howard gets a ring, too,
but what the hey. The Packer team in general seems to be a class
act.
4) Willie Clay took the stupidest penalty I have *ever* seen, at *any*
level.
5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK. Bill Parcells said that
Bledsoe played OK. I must be on a different planet. The first INT
wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back. The last two were
ATROCIOUS.
6) Things for the Pats to look for in free agency/the draft:
o offensive linemen
o a big-time cornerback
|
56.2743 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:39 | 11 |
| >
> 5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK. Bill Parcells said that
> Bledsoe played OK. I must be on a different planet. The first INT
> wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back. The last two were
> ATROCIOUS.
>
The last two were forced, while he was trying to make something happen.
Bledsoe played OK. To win that game, though, sometimes you have to play GREAT.
|
56.2744 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:46 | 4 |
|
Which is what the Pack did.
George
|
56.2745 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:47 | 1 |
| CHOKE
|
56.2746 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:48 | 35 |
| When I first started watching football, a little over thirty years ago, I loved
two teams -- the Packers and the Giants. Now to some, that would be roughly
akin to me saying "Daddy, I like the Yankees and the Red Sox," for which I
would have been thoroughly chastised by my father. (Fortunately, I think there
is a gene that allows one but not the other when it comes to those two teams.)
But when you're eight, and you like a team, you just like it, never mind who
their rivals are.
Having been a Giants fan over the years, I've grown to love Bill Parcells,
arguably one of the very best coaches in the game today.
So, last night's game was interesting for me -- I couldn't lose, really. I
guess I felt like a parent with a kid on each team. Turns out, I though it was
a REALLY good *GAME*.
Wasn't a blowout, and until Desmond Howard returned the kickoff, the Pats never
stopped trying to claw their way back in it. The momentum shifted several
times, and each team had moments of brilliance, and moments of stupidity.
The Packers were the more mature team, and I think that counts a lot when it
comes to the Super Bowl -- they'd been closer to getting their before, and
WANTED it so badly. The Pats got there, and in a lot of ways, just getting
there was, IMO, a big thing to them....
If Parcells were to stay with the Pats -- unlikely I think, because he's going
to be coaching the <ugh!> Jets, they'd get there again and win it.
Condolences to the Pats fans, it was a great season, and I said a few years
back that Parcells would get the team to the Super Bowl. Congrats to the
Packer fans -- the team added another building block to the legacy.....
'Saw
|
56.2747 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:50 | 5 |
| RE .2745,
Watching the Pats yesterday reminded me of the Tribe.
Ron
|
56.2748 | Congrats to the Pack | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:54 | 11 |
| Roland,
I'll certainly second that Desmond Howard is a jerk comment. He's
a class-a a$$hole. The refs should've thrown a flag for taunting
on that first return when he basically went into the Patriots
bench and started trash-talking. Rison and Howard give anyone a
perfectly good reason to hate this team. Too bad, because the
rest of this team seems to be a bunch of great ballplayers who
keep their piehole shut and play ball.
daryll
|
56.2749 | Blame Parcells if anyone-- you can't throw every single down | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:03 | 33 |
|
> 5) The WBCN folks said that Bledsoe played OK. Bill Parcells said that
> Bledsoe played OK. I must be on a different planet. The first INT
> wasn't bad - a great play by the d-back. The last two were
> ATROCIOUS.
The last two were atrocious? Are you not counting the last one, where
the ball was in Brisby's hands, but the DB unloaded on him with that
monster hit?
The INTs were overrated, on the whole, as far as establishing field
position and setting the Pack up. The second one was a bomb that was
as good as a punt, no disaster with the game still at 20-14. The third
one was worse, another back-foot job, but similar in that it was a bomb,
coming at a point in the 4th quarter when Pats were already desperate.
You have to consider game situations, and that Bledsoe did not look
like some scared pup out there on the whole even though the Pats had no
running game (Parcells gave up on it too early-- he should not have
wanted this kind of a shootout, and he could have prevented the
Packers' killer 17-point second quarter). Bledsoe did step up with
some nicely thrown balls on several occasions.
I expect some criticism of Bledsoe because he didn't deliver in
bringing the Pats back when needed, but the game was lost when the
defense put up absolutely no resistance while killing the Pats'
momentum in turning a 14-10 lead into a 27-14 deficit (and yes, to
a lesser extent the special teams for giving up the kickoff return
TD-- the mid-field coverage guys did not stay in their lanes).
But all in all he was not the key he was supposed to be, one way
or the other.
glenn
|
56.2750 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:04 | 15 |
|
With Drew Bledsoe I could live with stupid. And he is
stupid. What I can't brook is scared. Steve Grogan was
prone to stupid plays but he had a big heart and would
take a hit to try and make a play. Bledsoe, on the other
hand, will put it up for grabs and turn away from the rush
so it's anybody's ball. Stupid and scared. Poor combination.
And yes, Howard's play was huge. The Pats worked for their
td and Pack shows them how easy they can take it right
back. Ouch. Then when he starts smelling a ring, Reggie
White tossed Max Lane around like a Raggedy Ann doll.
Between Bledsoe and the porr special teams play, we just
weren't ready.
|
56.2751 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:08 | 12 |
|
>> The second one was a bomb that was as good as a punt, no
>> disaster with the game still at 20-14. The third one was
>> worse, another back-foot job, but similar in that it was a bomb,
>> coming at a point in the 4th quarter when Pats were already desperate.
The second one I'll give you. It was essentially as good as apunt.
The third one was a back breaker. There was still about 7 minutes
left and down by 14 points isn't too much to ask of an offense like
the Patsies'. They still had a chance until he lofted it like he
tends to do under pressure.
|
56.2752 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:09 | 20 |
|
For starters congrats to the Pack. Bledsoe played okay but not
great. He had 4 int's, 1 was a good play by a db (still should have
been avoided), the other 3 were on deep patterns essentially just as
good as punts. Getting down by 10 quick and early didn't hurt them,
they responded well and came back with 14 of there own. Yeah, they gave
up a 54 yrd TD pass but sometimes that happens. What really started
there down fall was the 81 yrd pass to Freeman. Favre picked up the
blitz and audibled, then threw a great pass. The Pats didn't respond
to the 81 yrd TD and gave up 10 more pts. So they got outscored 17-0
in the 2nd qrt, which killed them. Only down 13 they were able to
re-group at half time and came out strong, getting a TD to cut the lead
to 6. Then Desmond Howard really burned them for a 99 yrd kick off
return. Which was the ending, they came back from 10 down, didn't give
up 13 down and cut it to 6. Then got burned again and couldn't recover
for a 3rd time.
In the big play category it was GB 3 Patriots 0. Pats needed a GB
turnover or a big play and it never happened.
Ron
|
56.2753 | Stupor Bowl.. | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:15 | 15 |
|
Drew gets taken down by a D'back who grabs his shirt...afterall
he' only 6'4....step into the pocket...don;t throw backing up....%^&*(
D'backs cost them, Special Teams cost them, Bledsoe cost them...he
did throw 2 TD's but he also made plays that killed them.....how can a
guy underthrow so many passes ? The game plan didn't help...let's
see...throw the ball 2 yards and hope for a big play. All we heard was
wait until their wideouts get on the turf, they'll burn G.B., it was
the other way around... The Pat's D'line did a great job for the most
part...this game could have been won.
Howards totals almost matched the entire Pats offense.....and what
jerks some of the G.B. players are...
|
56.2754 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:22 | 2 |
|
TWO WORDS -----> CHOKE!
|
56.2755 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:25 | 24 |
| I don't think that the Patriots are as "mature" a team as the Packers.
The Packers have been in the hunt for the last three or four seasons,
continually honing what they needed to do to win. I remember late last season,
the Packers talking about their opening day loss to St. Louis which cost them
HFA and ultimately having to go to the Dallas County Jail to play for the NFC
crown.
They fixed that this season.
The Patriots on the other hand were molded into a good team, who got some
breaks and there along the way, and made it to the big game.
Now, it's just my opinion, but if Parcells were to stay, the team would begin
to mature. A loss in the Super Bowl or previous year's conference championship
game is mighty big motivation to work even harder the next year, and to make
those little tweaks and adjustments which give you the big plays you need.
But, with Parcells and Kraft at odds, I don't see Parcells returning to bring
the team to the Promised Land..... Who know who the Pats would bring in....
'Saw
|
56.2756 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:34 | 21 |
|
It wasn't just the interceptions with Drool...
It was the $%$@#! tipped passes! Doug Flutie got kicked off the
team for that. I guess "telegraphing passes" is an acceptable
excuse for being tipped, but shortness isn't.
Even when he had a couple of light years back in the pocket,
he'd just watch one guy all the way. No wonder defenses know
when to put up their hands...
A good game by Drew... No way. Not for $42. We can that a
good a game from QB's that come a dime a dozen... After 4 years,
we are stuck with an unimproving Drew, a stifling contract, and
game-plan centered on a one-dimensional QB. I'm sorry, I would
rather have a multi-faceted QB who was a mediocre passer than
Drew. His fantastic arm and great passes to Glenn come at
too high a price.
- Sean
|
56.2757 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:37 | 9 |
|
For some reason, I guess Desmond Howard's antics don't bother me.
I like him. On the other hand, the last thing we needed to see was
Mister Zero-Humility, Andre "Bad Moon" Rison achieving "vindication"
against all those who have so maliciously put upon him over the years.
He'll be very hard to live with now...
glenn
|
56.2758 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:39 | 5 |
| My brother had a classic. Someone, maybe Madden, said something
about how the Patriots should be afraid of Rison and my brother
comes out with, "Nope, it's his girlfriend they should fear."
I was rollling.
|
56.2759 | But my Packer note covers it | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:40 | 25 |
| Well the biggest difference was coaching. Holmgren adapted to
everything and Parcells gave up big plays. But Parcells made two big
mistakes.
He chose not to develop the run and Green Bay had the patience to
fall behind but stay with the run. I saw this and my bias covered my
good sense - eg no run => no victory and eventually the Packer D-line
unloaded.
Desmond. Parcells hounded his special teams and what did they do?
They woke this bum up, the same bum who was in the locker room taping
up when the 2nd half of the 49er game started and Homgren almost killed
him. Let this guy sleep.
Clay on "the stupidest penalty of all time". Only one worse in my
recall. U.S. hockey team in 1980 has the gold medal in its grasp
against Finland and some ingrate decides to get chippy to prove his
manhood and goes to the penalty box. As a Boston fan I die waiting for
the inevitable which fortunately didn't happen as other karma
prevailed.
Finally a nit. On the 99 Vinateri went to tackly Howard and was held.
Would he have made the play - I DON'T CARE - CALL IT YOU NFC CHEATS!!!
Drilled in the mind of these refs is don't affect the entertainment so
let this little transgression go. Bull.
|
56.2760 | Even game, except for turnovers and special teams | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bring back Coach Cal! | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:41 | 19 |
| So much for the "Parcells is a great preparation guy". The Patriots
were outcoached yesterday, pure and simple. Not having the free safety
helping out on the double wide set when your covering their fastest
receiver with a safety is inexcusable. Also inexcusable is totally
abandoning the running game. Curtis Martin only getting 11 carries was
ridiculous. He averaged 4 yards a carry, and showed signs of having a
big day, but they never got him the ball.
That said, turnovers and special teams won the game. Brett Favre was
slightly better than average, Bledsoe slightly worse. Unfortunately
for the Pats, their special teams did not play up to the level they
displayed all year. For some reason, they never put an all-out rush on
the Green Bay punter. A blocked punt would have been huge. Any kind
of turnover would have been, but the Pats forced none, and created no
big plays themselves. A very good season ends on a disappointing note,
because in my opinion the Packers are not a much better football team
than the Pats, but they were just that much better to win yesterday.
NAZZ
|
56.2761 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:47 | 4 |
| Bret Favre wasn't any better his first 4 years. It took a while for
the light to come on with him. I remember when he was one of the top
INT passers in the league. I'd give Drew a couple more years at
least.
|
56.2762 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:56 | 13 |
|
re .2760
That pretty much covers it. The Pack and Holmgren were a
step ahead of the Pats all day from the very first TD. They
showed the Pats the double tight end set, the Pats bit the
run and GB beats them up top. That pretty much set the tone.
It looked like the Pats could drive on them but they were
unwilling to committ to the run but instead fell in love
with the screen pass because it worked *once*. The one good
thing that will come of Parcells leaving is that Perkins will
be gone, too.
|
56.2763 | not Martin's fault | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:57 | 4 |
| Martin may have had only 11 carries at 4 yards/carry, but half of that
came on his TD run. The OL simply wasn't opening the holes.
Mike
|
56.2764 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:06 | 18 |
|
Congrats to the pack, with that outta the way. It looked
like a very Un-Parcells type of loss. I mean there was still
1 full quarter of football left and NE flat out gave up.
The look of desperation, especially when Drew heaves it up
for grabs. Hello, it's only 14 points. The o-line looked
like they didn't care. 3 man rush and Bledsoe was gettin
sacked left and right. Earlier it was a 5+ man rush and he
had time to clip his toenails ifn he wanted. If it was anyone
other than NE I'd have rooted for the Pack, bein an Nfc GIants
main myself. Anyone other than the evil cowpokes or fairywhiners
is still OK.
Shark
|
56.2765 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:13 | 2 |
|
TWO MORE WORDS ---> DOUG FLUTIE SUCKS!
|
56.2766 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:18 | 2 |
|
TWO MORE WORDS ----> THE *PACK* IS BACK!
|
56.2767 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:19 | 4 |
|
Can't believe i had to wait so long for the Pack to win it all again,
but it was worth the wait.
|
56.2768 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:19 | 2 |
|
TWO WORDS ----> Baltimore Ravens!
|
56.2769 | | NQOS01::nqsrv232.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Inside Intel | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:36 | 5 |
|
TWO MORE WORDS -------> Wasn't it good to see someone like Ernest
Byner, who's been around forever, finally on a team good enough to make
it to the Super Bowl? And he looked like he came ready to play, I'm not
sure why they didn't go back to him, more.
|
56.2770 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:07 | 11 |
|
Well the first lady of Sports is appropriately dressed in Black today. Nuff
to take a man's breath away, make him forget there was a game yesterday.
Just about the time you boys must have thought Drew was finally going to
become a man, reality set in. Parcells exposed him bad on his way out the
door. How can you coach a QB you can't yell at, can't talk to cause he might
crack in two. Patriots better find a Mike Shannan type guy to babysit their
primadonna or they'll remain ringless..........
mc
|
56.2771 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:29 | 16 |
| Well, Drew has his problems, but he's still the QB on the team that made it
to the Superbowl and lost because the defense gave up two long bombs and the
special team gave up a record setting return.
Take those away and the Pats would have won. Would you still be able to say
that this game proved Drew didn't have it or that he was exposed by Parcells?
Also I wonder how well Montana or any of the other greats would have driven
the team down the field with 3+ left to play if their 5 man front couldn't
stop a 3 man rush?
The Pats got beat by a better team that played a great game and caught a
few breaks on the way. All it proves is that a better team who plays a great
game and catches a few breaks is more likely to win on any given Sunday.
George
|
56.2772 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:40 | 15 |
|
>> Parcells exposed him bad on his way out the door. How can you coach
>> a QB you can't yell at, can't talk to cause he might crack in two.
>> Patriots better find a Mike Shannan type guy to babysit their
>> primadonna or they'll remain ringless..........
Mikey, I don't disagree with what you're saying. Parcells doesn't yell
at Bledsoe because it only makes a bad situation worse. I think you're
right *but* Parcells drafted Drew. He could have had Marvin Jones
or Rick Mirer but he wanted Bledsoe. And I didn't hear Parcells piping
up when the Patsies were getting ready to bust the vault for Bledsoe.
The Pats could get Drew a babysitter and that might help but what he
really needs is the whole shot from the Wizard of Oz - the heart,
the brain and some courage.
|
56.2773 | maybe come up with something yourself :p | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:46 | 2 |
|
TWO WORDS ---> COPY CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
56.2774 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:48 | 15 |
|
> Mikey, I don't disagree with what you're saying. Parcells doesn't yell
> at Bledsoe because it only makes a bad situation worse. I think you're
> right *but* Parcells drafted Drew. He could have had Marvin Jones
> or Rick Mirer but he wanted Bledsoe.
And they wouldn't have been in the Super Bowl. Look at the season-long
performance; there's no reason for major complaint with Bledsoe.
The pay part is a different story. Bledsoe is overpaid, no question.
I guess I don't have enough information to know if that could have
been prevented (would he have been lost to free agency?)
glenn
|
56.2775 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:57 | 13 |
|
I don't fault Parcells for taking him. I'd have taken him too if all I had
to go by was game film etc. He has a fantastic arm. Throw a bullet sure take
some thing off it no problem. The Oz pacakage he needs is a tough one to
diaganosis until you see him for a few years.
Glenn, while Bledsoe has some gaudy numbers to display, he was woefully
inconsistent all year long as well. For every game he won with his arm
Martin or the defense won as many also. and in the biggest games of the
the year he came up like crap. The defense clearly won the AFC championship
and Martin the semi's.......
mc
|
56.2776 | 'nuff said | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:59 | 4 |
|
The only guys who played good for the pats were Byers, Glenn and Tupa.
Gee, what's the common thread?
|
56.2777 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:05 | 12 |
|
These aren't exactly new complaints about Bledsoe. It's
not just that he didn't rise to it in the SB that's the
beef. Nope, this is just another occasion when Drew couldn't
play error free in a big game. This just happened to be
the *biggest* game. He's great when things are rolling his
way and he has all kinds of time but throw a little pressure
and adversity his way and there's no telling what he'll do.
BTW - Glenn, you forgot the "IMO" after your statement
about how the Patsies wouldn't havebeen in SB without
Bledsoe. It wasn't Drew that got us here.
|
56.2778 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:06 | 5 |
|
>> The only guys who played good for the pats were Byers, Glenn and Tupa.
Ted Johnson had the best game of any Patriot.
|
56.2779 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:06 | 2 |
|
ByrdBrain, you forgot the "IMO" after all of your statements.
|
56.2780 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:10 | 15 |
|
> BTW - Glenn, you forgot the "IMO" after your statement
> about how the Patsies wouldn't havebeen in SB without
> Bledsoe. It wasn't Drew that got us here.
I understand that. You made a comment on Parcells' draft decision that
at least seemed to imply that the Pats would have been better off with
the direct substitution of Rick Mirer at QB. IMO, the Pats would
not have been in the Super Bowl with Mirer at QB. That seems evident,
to me at least. The Pats are not such a great team overall that
they'd be able to overcome a mediocre QB. Their QB had a part in the
successes of this season.
glenn
|
56.2781 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:20 | 22 |
| The big difference between QB's yesterday was experience in terms of
reading defenses. On the 54 yrd TD to Rison, Favre read the defense and
knew that Rison would be 1 on 1 with Otis Smith. Favre saw that Rison beat
Smith easily and threw the ball, total time about 2 seconds. On the 81 Yrd
TD, the same thing, Favre recongnized the blitz (Clay was going to Blitz).
So he knew that Freeman would be 1 on 1 against Milloy in the middle.
Again since he already knew were his BEST matchup was, he didn't have to
analyze the defense before throwing, 2 seconds and bang TD. Clay was going
to blitz and read the play but didn't react quick enough.
When a QB recongnizes the defense and picks his target, if that
target is open at the snap of the ball. Forget it the pass will be
completed 90% of the time. I fault Al Groh on the defense he was
playing on both TD passes. Especially the 81 yrd TD, when the Pats were
in there standard defense with 3 WR's on the field. The Pats got burned
bad in the beginning of the season because they had no deep help with
the safety's. Until GB was running the ball at will, he should have had
the safety deep. The front 7 have been stopping the run pretty could
the last few weeks. No reason for your safety to not be deep.
Ron
Ron
|
56.2782 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:42 | 9 |
|
I don't know that Mirer would be a mediocre QB after four
years under Tuna. He at least came from a *big* time program
and has been through the fire. I do know that after four years
Bledsoe continues to make the same mistakes and his psyche is
as fragile as Laura's glass menagerie. I actually think Bledsoe
is looking forward to Tuna leaving. He's a laidback guy and Tuna
is anything but. A change of coaches might do him good. Then again,
he might get a new coach and do all the same dumb things anyways.
|
56.2783 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 15:51 | 9 |
|
| Bledsoe continues to make the same mistakes and his psyche is
| as fragile as Laura's glass menagerie. I actually think Bledsoe
Tommy,
GREAT simile there.
|
56.2784 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 27 1997 16:02 | 4 |
| I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who'll be happier than Drew when
Bill leaves. Maybe Bill himself but that's about it.
mc
|
56.2785 | Sam we sure could've used you | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 27 1997 16:05 | 18 |
| Well assuming Parcells leaves perhaps the offense will change and
Bledsoe can't help welcoming any change - he just doesn't seem
comfortable with the Perkins/Parcells approach.
It does seem a reach but the more I think of it the more I'd like to
ask Parcell's if he could have won the game with Sam Gash. The point
being that Parcell's probably didn't think he could run without Gash
and didn't really try to.
Now a top offensive lineman that can play the nfc 300lb'ers would seem
to be a need. I have seen Bruce Smith from the outside, and Lawrence
Taylor likewise, disrupt a quarterback but I can't recall a defensive
lineman just going berserk and tossing tackles around like saplings.
Bledsoe lost quite a few opportunities with pressures throughout then
something would go wrong like a tip, a drop or a mis-throw.
I do agree that Bledsoe doesn't have the fire of a Favre or Montana or
a Grogan.
|
56.2786 | but he does have a grogan style brain..... | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 28 1997 08:42 | 0 |
56.2787 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:07 | 12 |
| Well, I don't think that Bledsoe played all that bad a game. In
fact, I bet if you switched QB's, the outcome would be the same.
Bledsoe had no running game to set up the play action. His front
five couldn't stop GB when they were sending 3 fer cripes sakes.
He threw 4 int, but two of those game when the game was all but
done and everyone in the place knew he was putting it up. Why
Martin didn't get anymore carries is beyond me. I'm not part of
the "Drew Bledsoe, future HOFer" club, but he didn't play that
badly. He was more of a victim of a lousy game plan and putrid
special teams play than anything else.
daryll
|
56.2788 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:24 | 13 |
|
> Well, I don't think that Bledsoe played all that bad a game. In
> fact, I bet if you switched QB's, the outcome would be the same.
I agree, at least under the circumstances of this game (Favre
wasn't asked to do that much). But meanwhile, Favre is given all
this credit for this incredible ability to find the right receiver
against the blitz, when in both cases with Rison and Freeman his
man was in the clear by 5+ yards. Favre did his job, take nothing
away there, but it didn't take much.
glenn
|
56.2789 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:25 | 9 |
|
I hope Parcells takes Al Groh with him. The team was already burned
for a 54yrd TD and you fight back to take the lead 14-10. Then the
idiot plays a base defense against 3 WR's. GB was not running the ball
well at that point in time. There was no need for Willie Clay to be
playing tight to the line of scrimmage. He should have been playing
deep centerfield, so they couldn't get beat deep.
Ron
|
56.2790 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:33 | 6 |
| No kidding Ron. Someone should have mentioned to Willy that if
you're going to play tight, it might behoove you to make contact
with the WR rather than just letting him sprint by you. No
bumping, no contact, nothing.
daryll
|
56.2791 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:36 | 4 |
|
Bledsoe would be getting the credit Favre is if he'd have hit
Jefferson when he had a step instead of overthrowing him once
and underthrowing him twice both of which resulted in INTs.
|
56.2792 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:37 | 8 |
|
It was Lawyer Milloy that got burned man-to-man, not Clay (Clay was
in position to blitz). Major speed mismatch there. Even as he was
catching the ball it appeared that Freeman was increasing the
distance between himself and Milloy. Too easy...
glenn
|
56.2793 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:39 | 13 |
|
> Bledsoe would be getting the credit Favre is if he'd have hit
> Jefferson when he had a step instead of overthrowing him once
> and underthrowing him twice both of which resulted in INTs.
Yeah, I know, but none of those plays were the easy opportunities
that Favre had. Plus, the ball Bledsoe threw to Jefferson that
drew the interference call was beautifully thrown, as was the long
one to Glenn. But yeah, he threw 48 times and predictably wasn't
near perfect...
glenn
|
56.2794 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:46 | 10 |
|
>> But yeah, he threw 48 times and predictably wasn't near
>> perfect...
4 INTs and a 4.0 yards per pass avergae. I'd say that
he wasn't even in the same galaxy as "near perfect".
But I figured certain folks would be in here making
excuses for him when he came up short in a big game
again.
|
56.2795 | Just some fine-tuning | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bring back Coach Cal! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:47 | 17 |
| Now it's time to look forward to next year. With Parcells (apparently)
gone, the new man (whoever he is) will want to put his own mark on the
team. Given that, some of Parcell's high-priced talent will not be
brought back next year, including the following Parcells players: Dave
Meggett, Ricky Reynolds, William Roberts, and Keith Byars. Just
getting rid of those four will open up over $5 million in salary cap
money. In addition, I look for Zolak to try to earn a starting job
elsewhere, and with the success of Jefferson and Glenn, Brisby might
also be gone.
As for additions, it's obvious the Pats need a dominating defensive
lineman. They could use a cornerback, another offensive lineman, and
some backfield depth. But if they keep the nucleus of the team around,
they should be back in the playoff hunt nexted season (unless they
bring in Rich Kotite to coach!).
NAZZ
|
56.2796 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:49 | 13 |
|
> But I figured certain folks would be in here making
> excuses for him when he came up short in a big game
> again.
Ain't no need for excuses. It ain't my team and the game went
about how I expected. I wasn't carrying on about how the Packers
were nothing special and how Brett Favre was going to choke. But
it is predictable that when none of that garbage came to pass
Bledsoe would somehow be the culprit...
glenn
|
56.2797 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:51 | 16 |
| I think Favre is a much better QB than Bledsoe, but on Sunday, his receivers
made it such that he didn't HAVE to be.
Bledsoe is a good QB. Nothing that a little more maturing won't help. Will he
ever be able to read defenses well? I don't know -- some say that's a born
talent.
Pats got burned biggest on special teams, then on defense. Belichick was
running the D when the Giants won their two Bowls, not Groh. Groh was, at that
time I believe, the Linebackers coach.
If Parcells were to stay, I'd see the Pats winning the Bowl in the next
three or four years. But I think Parcells is gone....
'Saw
|
56.2798 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:53 | 8 |
| >> Bledsoe would somehow be the culprit...
Bledsoe ain't the culprit. It was a team loss. Mainly, a
special teams loss really. But if anything was predictable
it was the Waugamanesque excuses that I alluded to last week
that would ensue if Drew didn't perform. And he didn't.
|
56.2799 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:38 | 6 |
| |Bledsoe is a good QB. Nothing that a little more maturing won't help. Will he
|ever be able to read defenses well? I don't know -- some say that's a born
|talent.
I can't believe so many forget how bad Favre was once. He developed
the his skill for audiblizing; he wasn't always like this.
|
56.2800 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:43 | 12 |
| No kidding. Let's not forget that Farve has had outstanding WR,
two pro-bowl TE's and a great running game and an excellent defense.
You think he'd be MVP type material in Atlanta?
He's Steve Bono. He looked great in SF and there were a dozen NFL
teams that wanted him. Now that he's in KC and sans the great
supporting cast, he's riding the bench in favor of Rich Gannon.
Farve is a great QB, the system and his supporting cast makes him
so.
daryll
|
56.2801 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:56 | 13 |
|
I'm not a big Favre fan either but Bledsoe has Curtis Martin,
Ben Coates, Terry Glenn, etc. Not exactly chopped liver. I don't
want to come off like Drew can do no right because there is that
camp amongst Patriot fans. I just want to see him play a smart
error-free game when it counts. I want to see him take over a big
game when we need him to do that. He hasn't yet. And I'm beginning
to think he never will. He makes the same mistakes over and over
and over. The four INTs, the tipped passes, the two yard dump offs
when it's a 3rd and 10. It's enough to drive you nuts. He didn't
play well against the Jags in the AFC title game and he was subpar
in the SB. Like my old boss used to say, 'I want results not excuses.'
|
56.2802 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:56 | 17 |
| It's looking more and more like Parcell's was indeed very much
pre-occupied by his contract dilemma and this lack of focus penetrated
to the team. They played a fair game but when they needed the grit and
determination to comeback they didn't have it.
Parcell's got snookered and shafted just like he'd love to do if the
positions were reversed. His agent should go back to divorce cases but
that's typical of any lay-lawyer relationship. Regardless of the press
lawyers (and doctors) put out everyone has to manage these kind of
affairs and ask the stupid questions over and over again often with
hands around the throat.
All I can think of is Auerbach going to the Cincinatti Royals when
Cousy, five years retired, wanted to play a few games to spark fan
interest and demanding, and getting, compensation. Parcell's problem
is how much of the contract buyout and compensation from the Jets will
limit the total financial package he gets.
|
56.2803 | A minor nuisance | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:12 | 11 |
|
> Parcell's problem
> is how much of the contract buyout and compensation from the Jets will
> limit the total financial package he gets.
Not much, if at all. The $1.2M buyout is peanuts and you can bet
Leon Hess will pick up every penny of it on top of the agreed-upon
deal...
glenn
|
56.2804 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:16 | 4 |
|
The real kicker is the draft pick. If Parcells goes to a
division rival Kraft will want to tuck it to him by taking
a nice draft pick.
|
56.2805 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:20 | 7 |
| On the Freeman TD down the sideline, Clay was not tight to the line
nor did he step forward to stop the run. He was playing center field
flat footed and got a horrendously late start in getting over to
help Milloy. IMO the fault on that play goes to Milloy for not
jamming Freeman on the line and Clay for terrible help.
Jimbo
|
56.2806 | Quittin' on the verge... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:23 | 17 |
|
> The real kicker is the draft pick. If Parcells goes to a
> division rival Kraft will want to tuck it to him by taking
> a nice draft pick.
Yes, maybe their #2, a virtual late-1st rounder, possibly giving the
Pats overall picks #29 and #31.
Parcells' if-I-don't-get-my-way-I'll-hit-the-road act has gotten real
old. Cut through all the he-said-she-said stuff, and his exodus
from a Super Bowl team with the kind of youth that the Pats have is
unprecedented. It should make any team question why they'd want to
deal with him in the first place (yeah, I know why they will anyway;
he wins).
glenn
|
56.2807 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:23 | 12 |
| re .2790,
Darryl, Willy Clay shouldn't have been at the line of scrimmage or
even blitzing. With only 4 DB's and 3 WR's he should have been playing
deep zone in the middle. With Clay not covering anybody all 3 WR's were
1 on 1, with Freeman burning Milloy. If your going to blitz Clay from
that formation. You have to use a LB to bump Freeman at the line, and
then release him to Milloy. If not you should have your nickel defense
in the game. It was a stupid defensive call by Al Groh for that time of
the game.
Ron
|
56.2808 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:34 | 6 |
| I'm not arguing with you Ron. My point was that if they did have
him playing tight, he should at lkeast have jammed him at the
line. Instead, he let him right by him and adios, he was off to
the races.
daryll
|
56.2809 | better prepared??? | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:41 | 13 |
|
After reading all these replys....Did anyone ever consider that
Parcells was just outcoached?? Holmgren was ready and had a plan
for the time that the Pats would concentrate on stopping the run.
Maybe Parcells was concentrating on his new contract etc. but in this
game the Packers had a few surprises and they worked......The Pats
D did what there coaching staff told them to do. With the exception
of getting beat deep, but I credit Favre and the coaching staff for
looking for those openings on the defensive set-up......and
capitalizing on those mistakes.......Congrats to the Packers and there
coaching staff for there execution of a better game plan.
|
56.2810 | Nazz pegged it. | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:45 | 3 |
|
Westie, see .2760.
|
56.2811 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:46 | 12 |
| I distinctly remember the guy chasing Freeman looking like me trying to
catch young Phillip was "no-play" Clay. The other was Malloy. Otis
Smith got burned I recall by Rison.
I asked Glenn about Hitchcock who got a lot of grief but imho had the
talent but had to learn the tricks. eg how to do exactly what Dieon
does but not take a penalty everytime.
Although not decisive, the ability to get away with holding is the
chief mark of the nfc teams. I take it the Superbowl is a mixed
afc/nfc crew. The Pack went exclusively to the non Ty Law side it
seemed all game.
|
56.2812 | | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:47 | 7 |
|
Thanks Tom, hope it doesn't look that bad.....
Good review Nazz, wish I thought of it.....
/Westy
|
56.2813 | Give it a rest already | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:54 | 18 |
|
> Although not decisive, the ability to get away with holding is the
> chief mark of the nfc teams. I take it the Superbowl is a mixed
> afc/nfc crew.
BTW, after reviewing the tape, your complaint on that supposed holding
of Vinatieri on the kickoff return is so lame that I can only say that
if it'd been made by a Steelers' fan, he'd be forever tagged with the
worst kind of label as deluded whiner that this conference could
offer. Funny thing is, in the postgame Parcells made the same
complaint. The blocker put his hands on Vinatieri's upper back but
immediately removed them, all of this occurring after Howard had
already spun him around and was long gone with no chance at a play.
If the officials were to call a penalty on that kind of play the
game would never end.
glenn
|
56.2814 | re. Parcells outcoached by Holmgren | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:56 | 5 |
| Well you had at 10:03 yesterday
> EDWIN::WAUGAMAN 27-JAN-1997 56.2749 Blame Parcells if anyone--
Not to speak of first sentence of .2759 to start the lunch barrage.
|
56.2815 | If Glenn says White then it's black | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:13 | 11 |
| Well what are you saying did he illegally use the hands or not. I saw
it twice, never on slow, and the hands on the back (not patting it,
Glenn; just what do you think the purpose of those hands was?) potentially
kept Vinateri from making a play. Call the dang penalty you nfc
stiff!!!
Parcell's was probably pretty close to where the play happened. You
and your famous tape replays. This is not to say that the play was
decisive but Vinateri deserved a shot and Parcell's has gone to great
lengths to teach his teams not to hold on plays like that so some
"lame" call won't kill them.
|
56.2816 | what he said | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:24 | 90 |
|
I'm smarter than Parcells
By Mark Kreidler
Special to ESPNET SportsZone
NEW ORLEANS -- I can't believe it: I'm smarter than Bill Parcells.
OK, I'm not smarter than Bill Parcells. On the other hand, I am. I
can't decide.
And in one of those astonishing beginning-of-the-column coincidences,
neither could the Patriots. But since the subject at hand is Desmond
Howard, the human can of WD-40, perhaps it is only appropriate. This
is a guy who suddenly specializes in making people look like babbling
towers of indecision.
The New England Patriots elected to both punt and kick to Howard in
Super Bowl XXXI on Sunday, which seems like a pretty good tactic so
long as you haven't paid the slightest bit of attention to anything
Howard has done all season.
Of course, Parcells knows exactly what Howard has done. I mean, so do
I. I can watch TV. And right there on my TV a couple of weeks ago, the
poor San Francisco 49ers were getting their legacies handed to them in
a cold bowl (wait: that was a cold Lambeau), with Howard just slicing
them up on two huge returns that essentially decided the game.
The man is murder. Heck, he's not even all that nice about it. As he
was saying only recently (OK, it was about two hours ago), "There's an
old saying that the cream always rises to the top."
He meant himself. Creme Howard.
Anyway, Parcells knew what he was getting into, which would seem to
beg the question of why the Pats kicked to Howard anyway. Not to
mention why, why, why, and, in a related question, why?
"We were worried about him, but you can't cancel the game," Parcells
said afterward.
He was attempting to explain why the Patriots punted the ball to
Howard even though, when you get right down to it, they knew better.
They also kicked off to Howard, several times.
The results: 154 yards in kickoff returns, including the 99-yard
touchdown run that absolutely put this game away, and another 90 yards
in punt returns.
I get confused easily, but whose idea was this? You could tell that
punter Tom Tupa's heart wasn't in it; he put his first punt over
toward the left sideline, although utterly in bounds. Howard simply
circled under the ball and blasted up the left side for a 32-yard gain
to the Packers' 45; two plays later, it's 7-0, Green Bay.
The kickoff you've already heard about, seen, read about and dissected
to a sorry skeleton. We should cover politics this well. But the point
is that the ball was anywhere near Desmond Howard on that kickoff --
as opposed to, say, out of bounds and take your licks.
"Like I said over the course of the two weeks before this game, they
can roll the dice and kick it to me if they want, but I have full
confidence in my return team that they're going to allow me to pop one
sooner or later," said Howard. That popping noise you heard in the
background was the Patriots' balloon.
It's hard to get completely worked up about the Howard Conspiracy;
after all, nobody necessarily expected Tupa to have to punt eight
times.
Me, I would have rolled that ball out of bounds eight straight times,
taken my hits on the field position, and at least prevented Howard
from making me look like a big dope on national TV. I mean, I can do
that in the privacy of my own home.
But maybe Parcells felt like he just ought to send that coverage unit
out there and let 'er rip. The question only came up briefly Sunday
night, because the coach -- a winner, by the way, an utterly bright
man -- was so busy deflecting queries about his pending move to the
New York Jets.
To repeat: The man is reportedly leaving the Patriots, so solid and
strong and guided by a quarterback who is not yet even 25 years old,
for the 1-15 Jets.
Say, maybe I am smarter than Bill Parcells.
Mark Kreidler is a columnist for the Sacramento Bee, which has a web
site at http://www.sacbee.com/.
|
56.2817 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:31 | 11 |
|
On the 81 yrd TD pass to Freeman, Willy Clay was suppose to blitz.
Favre audibiled and Clay changed his mind. Problem is Clay didn't get
back to the middle or deep enough. Which was partially caused by a
quick 3 step drop by Favre.
As far as Parcells being outcoached. It just goes to show you that
it isn't always a good idea for the head coach to also be the special
teams coach. When does he have time to look at photos and make changes
in coverage during the game? Halftime, and it still didn't help.
Ron
|
56.2818 | | SALEM::DODA | Life's a meeting. Get on the agenda! | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:32 | 10 |
| I'm not going to argue with the column.
But "The cream always rises to the top."
Yeah right, now let's see his WR stats for the past 3 years....
Did GB even try to start this guy at wideout when just about
everyone was on the IR?
daryll
|
56.2819 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 13:11 | 12 |
|
> Well what are you saying did he illegally use the hands or not.
I'm saying he didn't. He barely made contact and I don't think he
hindered Vinatieri at all. I certainly don't know the rule verbatim
but I suspect that there must be some "harm" for there to be a "foul".
The only point to me seeing it again on replay is that I saw nothing
out of the ordinary watching the play live the first time.
glenn
|
56.2820 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:02 | 2 |
|
ByrdBrain, you forgot to put IMO after your comments.
|
56.2821 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:07 | 2 |
| Terry Glenn and Rodney Hampton are shining examples why Parcells needs
a checks and balances system.
|
56.2822 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:25 | 3 |
| As to whether the Tuna was out coached, I've seen two articles
(one very insistent about it) suggesting that Desmond Howard bailed
Mike Holmgren and company out of a bad game plan.
|
56.2823 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:30 | 12 |
|
> As to whether the Tuna was out coached, I've seen two articles
> (one very insistent about it) suggesting that Desmond Howard bailed
> Mike Holmgren and company out of a bad game plan.
Just curious, where do the two very easy bombs for TDs fit into
this "bad game plan"? Howard supplied field position, the offense
took what was given to them; it would appear that anything else is
over-analysis...
glenn
|
56.2824 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:38 | 11 |
| I think the main points were:
(1) the GB defensive plan for almost the whole of the first half
was just plain wrong; (2) after the 10-0 lead, GB had a few series
that they started in their own territory, and were very predictable
(and stopped) as NE came back to take the lead; (3) GB did take
advantage of good field position, and one bad mistake (the Freeman TD)
can't be attributed to a great "game plan"; (4) given a 27-21 score
with a decided personnel advantage (the author's phrase, not mine),
and a rather poor 2nd half performance up to the Howard KO return,
the Pats seemed to be well poised to keep this close to the end.
|
56.2825 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:43 | 1 |
| I think Green Bay adapted well when they started to lose momentum....
|
56.2826 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Jan 28 1997 14:58 | 7 |
| Sure they did. They made sure Desmond Howard got the ball,
and blocked well for him. After that, they relied on the hopes
that NE would abandon a running game that was moderately effective
on the drive that made it 27-21, and they were right. However,
had Howard run the ball back to, let's say the 30-35 yard line,
don't you think the Pack would have had a much tougher time the
rest of the way ?
|
56.2827 | This is tough, very tough, micro-criticism | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 15:05 | 17 |
|
> However,
> had Howard run the ball back to, let's say the 30-35 yard line,
> don't you think the Pack would have had a much tougher time the
> rest of the way ?
Yeah, sure, but so what? I don't see how you can criticize a game
plan largely on what "might" have happened had the special teams not
come up so big. Plus, to me, the pivotal part of the game was where
Green Bay consumed almost half the second quarter in taking a 20-14
lead to 27-14. New England only had one breath left after that.
Sure, you can look at points in the game where Green Bay sputtered,
but they scored 35 points, end of story.
glenn
|
56.2828 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 28 1997 15:33 | 17 |
|
Besides Green Bay probably would have blasted them had Holgrem not gone
braindead on that 4th and 2 foot call. I mean they had just run 12 or so
plays where they got positive yardage.
and if you switched the QBs the Patriots would have won and the Packers
lost. The game was a struggle that hinged on big plays. Favre made the
big play tosses and scrambled effectively. Drewenia made a lot of big tosses
more in favor of the Packers than his own team.
I can see fault Parcells abit but when it became painfully obvious that his
best case was a shootout he went for it. It isn't his fault that the 7 million
dollar man is two dollar and fifty cent punk..........
mc
|
56.2829 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:04 | 13 |
| Mike Madden of all people had a pretty good column today and apparently
has pretty good access to football people since he's never shown much
of a clue about anything in the past whether it be triple crown racing,
golf or Boston professional sports. He has Vinatieri definitely
claiming foul and as having a chance and definitely making Howard
change direction if he hadn't been held.
Other Patriots, Whigham for example, made statements to the effect that
"I guess holding is allowed [on runbacks] in the Superbowl".
But I only want to point out the incident and not have this be a "refs
cost us the game" micty. When push came to shove, GreenBay did the
pushing and shoving.
|
56.2830 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:17 | 3 |
|
That's how it's played in the NFC. Maybe the Almost Football Conference
teams should try learning to play the game. (8^}>
|
56.2831 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:24 | 20 |
| On the news this morning they were saying that the Patriots (i.e. Kraft) have
asked the commissioner to rule on whether Bill Parcells can coach elsewhere
next year and if he does if the Pats get any compensation. Here's the story
from the WCVB Channel 5 entry in boston.com
"N-F-L Commissioner Paul Tagliabue will hold a conference call today to
discuss the contract dispute between the New England Patriots and coach
Bill Parcells. The commissioner could rule as soon as tomorrow but until
then, no other N-F-L team is allowed to contact Parcells. Tagliabue is
getting involved at the request of Patriots owner Bob Kraft. Kraft and
Parcells disagree over whether the coach's contract allows him to move
to another team for next season -- Kraft says no, Parcells says yes. The
New York Jets reportedly are interested in Parcells."
WBZ cited one case where a coach left a year early to coach another team and
the team who the coach left got the other teams 1st round draft choice. They
didn't think that would if Parcells went to the Jets since it would be a #1
pick.
George
|
56.2832 | Partial Game Synopsis From A Packer Fan | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 28 1997 17:37 | 77 |
| I read as far as .2752 and I'll give a Packer fan's perspective:
I haven't been able to closely analyze the defensive alignments,
but it looked to me by the Patriot's closeness to Packer receivers
near the line of scrimmage, by their ability to stop the run, and
by the lack of adequate deep defense, that the Pats schemed to
stop the short end of the field - both run and pass.
The Pack got those big plays because the Patriot's scheme basically
forced them to. That was all that was on the plate. Further
defense for this is the fact that Rison was open deep another time,
i.e. I find it hard to believe that THREE times in the 1st half,
the Pats could allow such oppurtunities unless the defensive scheme
was emphasizing stopping the short (and thus being vulnerable by
design).
From a Packer perspective, what grated me the most was the 4th and
1 call. I thought it was a LOUSY call. I felt it was getting to
be lights out for the Pats at the beginning of the 2nd half. The
Pack was running well late in the 1st half where the last TD drive
included quite a few good runs. In the 1st second half drive, the
Pack was moving right down the field real nice and methodically
where they were even involving henderson quite a bit. Then, on
4th and 1, they run wide right instead of a nice safe QB sneak and
all the effort was lost. No field position and no score. Follow
this with the corner blitz the next time the Pack had the ball and
Green Bay's usual 2nd half dominance was largely curtailed.
I really thought they had light's out until the bonehead 4th down
play.
Beyond that, jacke missed a 47 yarder which is somewhat uncharacter-
istic of him and Chmura missed an easy ten yard pass that was right
in his hands.
All in all, I feel the packers were pretty much better as a team
and a lot better in so far as composure is concerned. The Pat's
chance was the two possessions after they led 14-10. That's right!
They recaptured the ball TWICE with that lead.
With the Pack only leading by six, it really looked scary from my
perspective. White and Dotson took themselves out on that last
Patriot TD drive, "Oh no! Are they tired?" Martin had a decent
TD run. They showed the fog and the blocked AC and I'm thinking,
"Wow! If the Pats stop the Pack, they just might be able to run
on us!"
In thinking composure, every aspect of the team rose to the occasion.
(Recall the SF game where SF lucked into that 21-14 deficit. GB
went on a game-crunching 72 yard drive with huge running plays.)
This time the special teams produced the stunning play of the game.
The offense converted the 2 pt. conversion. Reggie White sacked
Bledsoe on two of three plays. Right when they needed composure,
they got it.
If the Pats are lucky and by that I mean surviving what may be a
wholesale coaching change (assistants may all follow Parcells) and
in the NFL I think coaching changes are more of an impact than in
any other sport and if they can survive any player defections as
a result, they should contend for the SB for years to come.
They gave the Pack a good game. Bledsoe had some good moments.
They were just a little talent and a fair amount of composure
short.
Outside Desmond Howard, the SB MVP just may have been Ted
Johnson. He was awesome.
I think the Pack may contend for awhile as well.
Lastly, I think the dancing stuff sucked and I am sorry to see
it. Howard, Rison, and Freeman. What a bummer to see from my
beloved Pack!
Tony
|
56.2833 | Misc. | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 28 1997 18:16 | 42 |
| After reading the replies...
On coaching, I tend to think that the Pats so emphasized the
short end of the field that all that was left a lot of the time
was the bombs. In the 1st half alone, the Pack had three wide
open ones. So credit Holmgren for that (I think).
It was all coming together coaching-wise late in the 1st half/
early in the 2nd until that bonehead 4th down call. Check it out.
You'll see a real nice blend of running and passing. Good ball
movement. If you really think about it, that 4th down play was
HUGE (at the time) and it was a bad call. Too risky and too little
returns even if it did make a 1st down. Just QB sneak it for crying
out loud!
On favre...Mike, he has essentially the same NFL exp. as Bledsoe.
He never played in Atlanta. Favre's progression has been faster.
Also, I think he's very good. The Pack had very little running
the two years before this year and even though it was all on his
shoulders, he really elevated his game. And remember...they lost
Sharpe and Brooks only began really lighting it up last year.
I thought Parcell's game plan looked good at least in the 1st
quarter. The Pats could not run the ball - period. The way I
saw it, Parcells wanted time consuming drives with nice rollouts
in the hope of time of possession, scoring (of course), and tiring
out a good but slightly aged defensive line. If it continued to
work in the 2nd and 3rd quarters, we might have seen a Packer
defense about ready to roll over and die and you would have seen
more and more rushing attempts.
Daryll, Howard may not have any receiving numbers and his dancing
may be sickening, but the return accomplishments are so stellar
that there is no way to do any other than totally commend his per-
formance. I mean, he basically beat SF and then he breaks the
back of the Pats. He was pretty good against Carolina too. What
more could anyone expect in a playoffs. I mean, his output was
absolutely staggering.
Tony
|
56.2834 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:02 | 2 |
|
faster by light years imo on the QB comparision....
|
56.2835 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:09 | 14 |
|
Howard's dancing and such didn't bother me at all.
It looked like genuine enthusiasm although when he did
it front of the Pats bench someone's territorial instincts
should have kicked in and they should have throttled
Howard. But if you want to shut him up, stop him. We didn't.
He's SB MVP. So, he earned the right to dance, sing and
whatever the hell else he wants to do. If Parcells
wasn't special teams coach I wonder if he would have
been as stubborn or if he would have squib kicked so
as to avoid the big play.
BTW - Groiner, two words - Art Modell.
Two more words - American Hero.
|
56.2836 | Pats didn't step up to the task, their fault... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:18 | 27 |
|
> Howard's dancing and such didn't bother me at all.
> It looked like genuine enthusiasm although when he did
> it front of the Pats bench someone's territorial instincts
> should have kicked in and they should have throttled
> Howard.
Exactly. It would have been worth the 15 yards, and even the ejection
of some special teams-type. It also might have made an impression to
last the rest of the game. You just shouldn't be able to walk right
over to the opponents' bench, taunt like that and get away with it.
Someone should have stepped up to the duty. Remember Jack Lambert on
Cliff Harris? That kind of thing can spark a team. Leave it
unchecked, and it works the other way.
> But if you want to shut him up, stop him. We didn't.
Also the fact. But I think Parcells made the right decision in kicking
to Howard. The squib is a surrender that only guarantees the Packers
good field position for the rest of the game. I don't think you can
play scared like that and win, generally. And the kickoff that Howard
did return for TD was a beauty by Vinatieri, a lot of hangtime, the
kind of kick where if coverage is doing its job, can pin the Pack
inside the 15.
glenn
|
56.2837 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:26 | 6 |
|
If the kick hung up there, then why the hell did the wedge and Howard get a
10 yard headstart? I haven't seen a replay since the game but I thought it got
there a tad quick.
mc
|
56.2838 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Jan 29 1997 10:46 | 2 |
| I think the touchback makes much more sense than a squib kick.
Completely takes Howard out of the game.
|
56.2839 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 29 1997 10:47 | 9 |
|
> I think the touchback makes much more sense than a squib kick.
> Completely takes Howard out of the game.
That's a matter of execution. The 70+ yard kickoff is far from
automatic...
glenn
|
56.2840 | college kids do that | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Jan 29 1997 10:49 | 2 |
| then get a new kicker. The Pats kicker can't even get it in the end
zone.
|
56.2841 | Parcells maybe the GM only?? | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Jan 29 1997 10:59 | 11 |
| QUESTION: Heard something about Parcells to the Jets.....BUT
Not as Coach but GM....Now how would this affect the contract, what
Kraft says as he can't coach, compansation etc......????
Could this have been the secret all along? VP/GM Parcells???
Sign Beleichek as Head Coach but he controls everything???
something to think about...../Westy
|
56.2842 | coach or GM | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 11:00 | 6 |
| According to Kraft, the words are "coach or equivalent position",
seemily intending to keep Parcells from any GM jobs as well.
But, it's all up to Tabliabue at thised point.
TTom
|
56.2843 | RE: .2840 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Jan 29 1997 11:21 | 3 |
|
Aren't college kids kicking from 5 to 10 yards closer? The pros
kick from the 30.
|
56.2844 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jan 29 1997 12:09 | 12 |
|
Yes, College kids kick from closer don't know if its 5 or 10.
The problem with Adam Vinateri is that he is just plain tired. He
played his senior year in college, World Football League, and full
NFL season without any breaks. I also think that the coaches don't
want the kickers kicking the ball into the endzone, but want it
returned. So much more good things can happen during a return then
bad things for the kickoff team. With the big one being a fumble/
turnover and a penalty. Which starts the other team inside the
20. Which factors into the overall field position.
Ron
|
56.2845 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:02 | 9 |
| Well, there are still NFL kickers booting it into the end zone.
Anyway, look at the Super Bowl. The Pats started most of their drives
on the 20 even with Meggett returing (does he look slow or is it me?).
Green Bay had much better starting field position on average. It is a
game of field position and the Pats miserably lost that battle. When
the title is at stake, you do whatever you can to equalize an
opponent's advantage. As the saying goes, you shouldn't make the
same mistake twice. Parcells & Co. made it several times.
|
56.2846 | Some Favre questions to try to fairly contrast vs Bledsoe | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is back - watch out NCAA! | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:56 | 7 |
| Thanks for the kind words, Tommy.
I'm curious - does anyone know how old Favre is? How long has he been
in the league? Was he with one or two other teams before going to the
Packers?
NAZZ
|
56.2847 | Favre's history | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:02 | 62 |
| from nfl.com:
Brett Favre, Packers
Height: 6-2
Weight: 222
Born: October 10, 1969
College: Southern Mississippi
Experience: Sixth year in the NFL
If NFL fans thought Brett Favre was something else in 1994 when he
passed for 3,882 yards and 33 touchdowns and set a Packers' record for
passer rating with 82.2, he showed them he was just getting started in
1995. In leading Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game, Favre was the
NFL's most valuable player. He led the NFC in passer rating at 99.5,
and his 38 touchdown passes were the third-most ever.
Favre has been a starter in Green Bay since 1992, when he was acquired
from Atlanta in a trade. He has led the Packers to three consecutive
playoff appearances, the first time the team had done that since the
1960s. He has passed for more than 3,000 yards in each of the past
four seasons, earning three Pro Bowl selections.
After the 1995 season, Favre made news of a different kind. He
voluntarily entered, and successfully completed, a rehabilitation
program to combat an addiction to pain relievers.
Before being selected by Atlanta in the second round of the 1991 NFL
draft, Favre had a fine college career at Southern Mississippi. He set
numerous school passing records, leading his team to a pair of bowl
victories. Before his senior season, he was in a terrible auto
accident, but recovered in time to lead Southern Miss to an early
season upset of highly ranked Alabama. Favre came from seventh on the
depth chart as a freshman to become the starter three game into his
sophomore season. Raised in Kiln (pronounced "kill"), Mississippi,
Favre was a football and baseball star. Playing football for his
father, the coach, at Hancock North Central High School in Kiln, Favre
was a quarterback, strong safety, punter, and placekicker.
Close up
In his first playoff game with Green Bay, Favre completed one of the
most amazing passes in Packers history. With under a minute remaining,
he threw an off-balance, across-the-field pass that Sterling Sharpe
caught for a dramatic, game-winning touchdown.
Stats
[INLINE]
Passing Att Com Pct Yds Ypa Td Td% Int Int% Sac Lost Rate
1991 Atl. 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 40.0 1 11 0.0
1992 G.B. 471 302 64.1 3227 6.9 18 3.8 13 2.8 34 208 85.3
1993 G.B. 522 318 60.9 3303 6.3 19 3.6 24 4.6 30 199 72.2
1994 G.B. 582 363 62.4 3882 6.7 33 5.7 14 2.4 31 188 90.7
1995 G.B. 570 359 63.0 4413 7.7 38 6.7 13 2.3 33 217 99.5
Totals 2150 1342 62.4 15971 6.9 108 4.7 66 2.9 129 902 88.6
Rushing Att Yds Avg Lg Td
1992 G.B. 47 198 4.2 19 1
1993 G.B. 58 216 3.7 27 1
1994 G.B. 42 202 4.8 36 t 2
1995 G.B. 39 181 4.6 40 3
Totals 186 797 4.3 40 7
|
56.2848 | and Bledsoe | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:06 | 64 |
| from nfl.com:
Drew Bledsoe, Patriots
Height: 6-5
Weight: 233
Born: February 14, 1972
College: Washington State
Experience: Fourth year in the NFL
Few young quarterbacks have had the impact on a team or on the league
as did Drew Bledsoe in his first two NFL seasons. In 1994, he set
all-time NFL marks for pass attempts in a season (691), attempts in a
game (70), and completions in a game (45), while leading the league's
top passing offense. In 1995, he again passed for more than 3,000
yards and led the AFC in pass attempts with 636. In addition, he
already holds almost all the important Patriots single-season and
single-game passing records. The youngest passer in NFL history to top
7,000 career yards, Bledsoe is one of the NFL's top young quarterback.
He began his road to the top as an all-state player at Walla Walla
(Washington) High School. Then, in only three seasons at Washington
State, he finished second in school history in passing yardage,
touchdowns, and completions. Chosen by New England as the number-one
overall pick of the 1993 NFL draft, he proved to be the right choice,
helping the Patriots' passing offense jump from 26th to 12th in the
NFL.
Before the 1994 season, Bledsoe was regarded as a future superstar,
but he proved that the future is now. In the 1994 season's 10th game,
against Minnesota, with Bledsoe already on a record pace, he exploded.
In a come-from-behind overtime thriller, Bledsoe set single-game
records for attempts and completions and led New England to a 26-20
victory. After halftime of that game, he completed 37 of 53 attempts
for 3 touchdowns and no interceptions. The game ignited a seven-game
win streak that catapulted the Patriots into the playoffs for the
first time since 1986. His season total of 4,555 yards was the
eighth-best in NFL history, to go along with the single-season
attempts record he set. Finally, he missed the completion record by
only 4. Bledsoe's amazing season earned him a trip to the Pro Bowl,
becoming the second-youngest quarterback ever selected.
Along with his amazing personal statistics in 1994, Bledsoe helped
five teammates became the first quintet in NFL history to each make 50
or more catches in the same season. Ben Coates, Michael Timpson, Leroy
Thompson, Vincent Brisby, and Kevin Turner all topped 50.
Close up
Along with being active in several New England charities, Bledsoe
endowed a scholarship at Washington State in honor of his grandfather.
Stats
Passing Att Com Pct Yds Ypa Td Td% Int Int% Sac Lost Rate
1993 N.E. 429 214 49.9 2494 5.8 15 3.5 15 3.5 16 99 65.0
1994 N.E. 691 400 57.9 4555 6.6 25 3.6 27 3.9 22 139 73.6
1995 N.E. 636 323 50.8 3507 5.5 13 2.0 16 2.5 23 170 63.7
Totals 1756 937 53.4 10556 6.0 53 3.0 58 3.3 61 408 67.9
Rushing Att Yds Avg Lg Td
1993 N.E. 32 82 2.6 15 0
1994 N.E. 44 40 0.9 7 0
1995 N.E. 20 28 1.4 15 0
Totals 96 150 1.6 15 0
|
56.2849 | Facts are always appreciated | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is back - watch out NCAA! | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:42 | 5 |
| Thanks for the info - I wasn't sure if there was an interim team
between Atlanta and Green Bay. I also thought it was his 7th or 8th
year in the league.
NAZZ
|
56.2850 | especially when they embaress Bledsoe even more!! | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:47 | 0 |
56.2851 | 4500 yards not = embarassment(stats < 1996) | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:57 | 1 |
|
|
56.2852 | Favre >>>>>> Bledsoe | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 29 1997 17:38 | 1 |
|
|
56.2853 | | NQOS01::nqsrv235.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Inside Intel | Wed Jan 29 1997 22:03 | 5 |
|
Meggett has never been that great a KO returner, IMO. Punt returns are a
nother story.
brews
|
56.2854 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 30 1997 08:38 | 4 |
|
with all the attemps he had he should have 4000 grand by default. Look at
the differences in ratings for the years a better judge of a qb's overall
effectiveness.
|
56.2855 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 30 1997 09:42 | 7 |
| Ratings put a high premium on td passes and negative on interceptions.
With Martin increasingly able to sneak into the end zone the Patriots
were able to score in the red without the pass but they got there via
the air. Add Martin's tds and divide by 2 and get a fairer rating.
But of course Favre is a much better qb, no one anywhere is discounting
that. Not especially after Sunday.
|
56.2856 | carry on | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Thu Jan 30 1997 09:44 | 5 |
| > -< Facts are always appreciated >-
We don't need no steenkin facks!~
TTom
|
56.2857 | makes a big difference too | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:31 | 2 |
| A case could be made that Favre has had a better group of receivers for
a longer time.
|
56.2858 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:13 | 113 |
| I think that Parcells had his mind made up long ago, and that Kraft
suggested that this was the case. To that end, I applaud them both for
keeping this in the background [as best they could] for the entire
season. While they both claimed that they would get together at the
end of the season to discuss next year, that was just their
professionalism in staying focused on the task at hand. It must have
been somewhat bitter-sweet for Parcells as the team progress during the
season and through the playoffs.
I see this as analagous to a married couple, who realize they will soon
divorce, but maintain the party line for the kids until a big event has
occured. Could have been a graduation, a wedding, or a
life-threatening operation. But the couple stayed together for the
benefit of their kids, at least until the big event was complete.
I'm not happy that Bill is leaving, because I think he's done the best
job any Patriot coach has ever done. I understand his position, and I
understand Kraft's position. Both have done great things for this
organization. But a parting of the ways is now inevitable. I only
hope that they can continue in their professional manner and not engage
in name-calling or mud-slinging. [Mud slung is ground lost.]
Following is the announcement as posted in Sportsline:
SportsLine USA - NewsWire
Parcells Bound To Patriots For 1997
Coach Bill Parcells is contractually bound to the New England
Patriots for the 1997 season, the NFL ruled tonight.
NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue ruled in favor of the AFC
champion Patriots and owner Bob Kraft in their dispute with
Parcells, who cannot coach another NFL team in 1997 without
Kraft's consent.
The ruling does not mean Parcells must coach the Patriots. After
the 1995 season, he shortened his five-year contract by one
year, but the contract still contained a provision which gave
the team the right to employ Parcells if he chose to coach in
1997.
Parcells has long been rumored to leave the Patriots to become
coach and general manager of the New York Jets. He reportedly
has feuded with Kraft over control of personnel decisions with
the Patriots.
According to the ruling, Parcells could pursue other business
opportunities, such as broadcasting or non-coaching positions.
There was no indication as to whether Parcells could take a
team's general manager's job, then assume the coaching duties
one year later.
Friedman & Atherton, the Boston law firm that represents
Parcells, issued a one-paragraph statement tonight,
acknowledging receipt of Tagliabue's ruling.
"Bill Parcells is considering the various options available to
him. He will make a statement as soon as possible," it stated.
In his ruling, Tagliabue cited an amendment made at Parcells'
request on January 12th, 1996, which removed the fifth year --
the 1997 season -- from the contract, but gave the Patriots the
right to employ Parcells if he decided to coach in 1997.
Tagliabue based his ruling on a portion of the amendment which
read, in "the event that (Parcells) desires to continue as an
NFL head coach or other comparable position after January 31,
1997, and the (Patriots) desire to continue to employ (Parcells)
as its head football coach for an additional year through
January 31, 1998, then the parties agree to extend the
employment agreement" through the 1997 season.
Tagliabue held a one-hour conference call Tuesday with attorneys
for Kraft and Parcells. As commissioner, Tagliabue has
exclusive authority to resolve such disputes under the NFL's
constitution and by-laws.
Newsday (New York) reported today that the agent for Parcells,
Robert Fraley, said his client will not return to New England
for the 1997 season regardless of the commissioner's ruling.
Prior to the Super Bowl, there were reports that the Patriots
had lined up San Francisco 49ers defensive coordinator Pete
Carroll as a replacement for Parcells.
The request for a hearing by both parties finalized the divorce
between the Patriots and Parcells, who guided the team to its
first Super Bowl appearance in more than a decade. New England
lost to the Green Bay Packers, 35-21, Sunday in Super Bowl XXXI.
The legal squabbling is far from over. Parcells may still try
to bolt to the Jets, with Kraft offering consent in exchange for
the first overall pick in the April draft, which belongs to the
Jets.
The Jets likely will offer Parcells complete control of football
operations, a situation he once had in New England until Kraft
turned over draft duties to director of player personnel Bobby
Grier. A disagreement over last year's draft selections began
the rift between Parcells and Kraft.
Parcells is just the second coach in NFL history to take two
organizations to the Super Bowl. He coached the New York Giants
to victories in Super Bowls XXI and XXV.
Parcells is 119-86-1 in 12 seasons as an NFL coach, including a
10-5 mark in the playoffs.
Wed Jan 29 20:57:20 EST 1997
|
56.2859 | And a draft choice is a draft choice | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:30 | 10 |
| Parcell's has pretty much told his side of the story thru his
mouthpiece McDonough. Strangely I do believe that he at least clearly
believed that to coach the Patriots next year was up to him and the
fine print requiring compensation a total blindside.
This should be a lesson to the folks in South and Boston proper and the
state in general to get it all in writing and read every line because
he'll be pulling a similar fast one on the stadium deal.
Then again feeling sorry for Parcells comes awfully hard.
|
56.2860 | According to ESPN | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:59 | 8 |
| Kraft didn't become rich by just giving things away. I have to laugh at
McDonough's story now. He came off as saying Kraft would lose and would
look ridiculous in the end. Well Bill (and Wil's) agent either lied or
didn't know the whole ramifications of the contract because it was a
slam dunk. The Jets have supposedly offered 2 #2 draft picks and the
Pats told them they want the #1 pick.
Mike
|
56.2861 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:02 | 12 |
| If you suffered through the Sullivan and Kiam regimes
you have to love how Kraft tucked it to Parcells. Billy
Sullivan would have lost Parcells and probably would be
*giving* who ever gets him a draft pick. Kiam would have
lost Parcells but takem cash in return. Kraft got the
dough and will probably get a good draft pick as well.
I'm sure Kraft is getting ready to take Pats fans for a
ride because that's the greedy nature of the owner beast
but if you're going to get it done to you it might as well
be by one of the best. In the beginning I thought Kraft was
nuts to try and build his stadium in Southie but it looks
like if Beggin' Bob is crazy, he's crazy like a fox.
|
56.2862 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:15 | 16 |
| Who says Parcells has lost anything yet. Jets will not give up Orlando
Pace and will have Parcells as coach next season.
1. Parcells thinks he has a clear agreement with Kraft. Shame on
Parcells. Not the first and not the brightest to hear tell of it.
2. Parcells and Kraft agree that before they can begin to fight they
have to find out from Tagliabue (who's boss among 30 is Kraft) what
they will fight about.
3. Now come negotiations. See second sentence. Kraft can probably
quickly get #33 or so in this years draft and a 15-25 down the line.
If he waits then he has no coach until Tagliabue steps in again. Or
the courts get involved and when have the nfl ever won?
But as I said before Auerbach did the same thing as Kraft.
|
56.2863 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:20 | 1 |
| If the Pats did get the #1 pick, they could pick Peyton Manning....
|
56.2864 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:23 | 13 |
|
>> Kraft can probably quickly get #33 or so in this years draft
>> and a 15-25 down the line. If he waits then he has no coach
>> until Tagliabue steps in again. Or the courts get involved
>> and when have the nfl ever won?
ESPN is reporting that the Jets have offered the Pats two second
round picks and a million bucks for the Tuna. Kraft turned them
down. I think you have it backwards, billte. Time is a bigger
factor for the Jets than it is for the Patsies. We have our per-
sonnel people in place to analyze the draft and free agent market.
The Jets want to give that job to the Tuna and the sooner they can
get him it the better.
|
56.2865 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:43 | 15 |
|
Two #2 picks and a million. I honestly doubt the cash is a big
consideration in this whole thing.
Why not offer to *trade* #1 picks in return for letting them have
Parcells, rather than insisting on just getting their #1? It's
a decent compromise position from Kraft's perspective.
What frightens me is what the Pats want to allegedly do if they get
the #1 overall, which is to pick Orlando Pace. I think that'd be
a mistake. Get it, then trade *down* for a lineman and a lower pick.
Use the pick for a corner, or another lineman.
Peyton Manning, huh? From the school that gave the world Heath Shuler?
|
56.2866 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:52 | 11 |
|
Its only been day 1, if I was Kraft I would hold out a little
longer for this years #1 pick. If you can't get it then tell the Jets
this years #2, plus next years #1 for Parcells. Take a crapshoot on
next years #1, who knows where it could be.
Then for this years draft if there is a player still on the board
you really want at around the 20th pick. You can trade the 29th and
31st pick to move up. Then next year you have 2 #1's to potentially
move up in the draft.
Ron
|
56.2867 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 30 1997 17:01 | 8 |
| After the Max Lane massacre last Sunday night I'd think Pace would be a
top priority. We moved down once and got Singleton and Agnew.
Obviously this is just fishing around and a deal will be cut soon. But
Parcells has leverage. Earhardt is at the Jets and could take over for
a year. Parcells goes to a network and does a detailed draft report
over the air. Just talking about it would move Tagliabue to tell Kraft
to take a lesser deal than #1 overall.
|
56.2868 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jan 30 1997 18:36 | 5 |
| I agree with Pace. We don't need Manning, Mr. Heisman, or Jake
Plummer. We don't need Troy Davis. We need a widebody to protect
Bledsoe and make large holes for Curtis Martin. Football begins and
ends with the lineman. Even Bledsoe does well if his protection lasts
long enough.
|
56.2869 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Jan 30 1997 22:26 | 12 |
| Some of the possibilities for coaches include:
Pete Carroll
Joe Gibbs
George Seifert
Don Shula
Bill Belichick
Not that all are actually available. My preference far and away would
be Gibbs, followed by Seifert, Shula, Carroll, and Belichick.
Ted
|
56.2870 | Lineman, yes. Pace with #1? No. | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 31 1997 09:04 | 17 |
| RE: the last few
My problem isn't with picking a lineman - it's with picking Pace in
particular. The guy is dominant, then disappears at stretches. And
this is at the college level.
There's no doubt the Pats need offensive line help.
What Ron said makes a lot of sense. You could probably still get a
very nice corner to eventually complement Ty Law somewhere around
#20.
BTW - I think Law was one of the *good* Parcells draft picks. Many
folks (including myself) said "who"? But take a look at what the guy
has turned into. He came up *HUGE* in the Dallas game, and how many
times did the Pack throw at him?
|
56.2871 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:07 | 6 |
|
You have to remember that Bruce Armstrong realistically only has
~3 years left of football. He has been in the league for about ~11
years now. Which could swing them into picking Pace.
Ron
|
56.2872 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:43 | 12 |
|
> Note 56.2865 by IMBETR::DUPREZ
>
> Why not offer to *trade* #1 picks in return for letting them have
> Parcells, rather than insisting on just getting their #1? It's
> a decent compromise position from Kraft's perspective.
I've been wondering this very same thing. I've kind of wondered that
if they let Tagliabue arbitrate (which they probably won't), that
that's what he'd rule.
- Sean
|
56.2873 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:47 | 6 |
| Question is, would that be a good deal for the Jets.
Their 1st round pick is #1 overall. The Pats should be down the line near
last when most of the franchise type prospects would be gone.
George
|
56.2874 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:52 | 8 |
|
Unbelievable all the local radio stations can do is roast and toast Parcells
instead of addressing the Patrios real problem what do about Bledsoe? His
salary, his heart and his mind make him untradable so they're stuck with
either keep the looser for 5 more years or eating his salary and getting
a real man out there to lead the team...........
mc
|
56.2875 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:57 | 13 |
| >> The Pats should be down the line near last when most of the
>> franchise type prospects would be gone.
The draft is a crapshoot and franchise picks aren't always in the
top 10. Emmitt Smith and Dan Marino were both picked in the middle
of the first round and guys like Tony Mandarich, who was picked
2nd the year he came out, sometimes end up riding pine for their
brief careers. I'm with Roland Duprez. Orlando Pace is at times
awsome and at others invisible. That may be because Cooper didn't
know how to take advanatge of him. I don't know. I do know that if
you could pry the #1 away from the Jets, it'd be pretty damned
valuable to someone else and as such you could parlay it into a
slew of decent picks and mybe even players and picks.
|
56.2876 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:02 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2875 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
>... I do know that if
> you could pry the #1 away from the Jets, it'd be pretty damned
> valuable to someone else and as such you could parlay it into a
> slew of decent picks and mybe even players and picks.
Another reason the Jets might want to keep the #1 pick.
I wonder if part of what's going on is that Parcells feels he blew the #1
pick he used for Bledsoe and wants another chance at picking a Quarterback that
he can mold and use as the centerpiece of a new team.
I doubt that would be all of it but I wonder if it's a factor. If not a
factor in leaving the Pats, maybe a factor in going to the Jets.
George
|
56.2877 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:09 | 15 |
|
George - no kidding that the Jets want to keep the #1 pick. We all
know that it's worth a lot. The basic point is that Kraft is going
to try to make it hurt the Jets as much as possible for two reasons:
1) they're in the same division, and more importantly...
2) this has now gotten *really* personal. Supposedly, Kraft is really
miffed that L'Affaire Parcells clouded the enjoyment of the Super
Bowl for himself and everyone else involved with the franchise. Up
to that point, it was philosophical and business differences only.
It's classic negotiating - ask for as much as you can get, then fall
back on what you really expect.
|
56.2878 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:09 | 6 |
|
smart move by kraft... tuna wants out, he's gonna leave after next
season anyways, force him to stay
does tuna have trade power? if so, bledsoe will get traded to the jets
this year
|
56.2879 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:46 | 12 |
|
Some of you guys are amazing the Pats loose the Super Bowl, so its
Bledsoe's fault, he stinks, get rid of the bum. Using that reasoning
Dan Marino, John Elway, and Jim Kelly are all losers. They stink they
should have been cut/released by there current teams years ago. If
Miami got rid of Dan Marino 12 years ago after he lost a Super Bowl.
Miami would have won a Super Bowl since then. If Buffalo dumped Jim
Kelly after his 1st Super Bowl loss, they would have won the next 3
without him. The Donks would have finally won a Super Bowl if they
got rid of John Elway a long time ago.
Ron
|
56.2880 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:34 | 7 |
|
I don't think anyone can argue that Bledsoe isn't effective when he
gets time to throw. I think putting a couple of additional stud
offensive linemen in front of him will help make his contract look
a little more reasonable. The pieces are already there at the
skill positions.
|
56.2881 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:05 | 12 |
|
It's hard to say on Marino as his team never got back but in the Donks and
Bills' case for sure. Both are loosers. Would both teams have won with
differnt QBS? Maybe, maybe not but given both guys more than contributed
their share to their teams' misfortunates is clearly evident. Great QBS
wouldn't come up empty that many times. Both Elway and Kelly have heart
but both are happy feet babies who have thrown the ball up for graps
under pressure more times than not. Also their cranial matter is suspect.
Bledsoe's cranium is damaged and his heart is non-exsistant so how you going
to win the ultimate game with him?
mc
|
56.2882 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:12 | 12 |
|
ESPNet SportsZone says that in an 11:30 am announcement, Parcells has
said he won't coach in 1997. He basically said that if he was going
to coach, he had to coach the Patriots, and he wasn't going to coach
the Patriots.
Question is, is he telling the truth?
Also, if the Jets pull the aforementioned deal using Erhardt as coach
for one year, might the Pats be able to charge the Jets with tampering
anyway (provided they could prove a scheme was in effect).
|
56.2883 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:52 | 7 |
|
re .2881,
MC, I don't buy your argument. If Marino was any good, he would
have been to multiple Super Bowls.
Ron
|
56.2884 | required commentary | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:56 | 1 |
| Was Robert E. Lee any good at being a general?
|
56.2885 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:58 | 4 |
|
Ron, you're usually one of the more lucid noters in here
but I'm having trouble following your logic on this Marino
thang.
|
56.2886 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jan 31 1997 14:22 | 20 |
| > -< required commentary >-
>
>Was Robert E. Lee any good at being a general?
I'll bite.
Robert E. Lee was one of the best generals either side fielded in that war.
Time and again early on, he confounded his opposite number, who usually, early
on, was less talented.
Later on, I believe two things plagued General Lee. Granted, a reply in this
conference has to be nothing short of a sweeping generalization, but first, he
had a finite supply of men and the goods of war, whereas the industrialized
north didn't. Second, I think that after Gettysburg, the war was not winnable
for the south, and that surely was a handicap.
|
56.2887 | as they say, ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Fri Jan 31 1997 14:36 | 2 |
| Yeah, but he never won the big one :=]
|
56.2888 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jan 31 1997 16:05 | 9 |
| RE: tampering
This is all over the talk shows here and I'm surprised it took so long for
someone to bring it up. What are they saying in New England?
It's a no-brainer that the Jets were tampering for Parcells to have a
job and everything all lined up.
Mike
|
56.2889 | Couldn't resist | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Sat Feb 01 1997 21:30 | 5 |
| >Later on, I believe two things plagued General Lee. Granted, a reply
^^^^^^
And that would have been the third.
|
56.2890 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Mon Feb 03 1997 08:31 | 7 |
| Mike,
The Pats cann't prove it but if the Jets want Parcells for nexted year
it's going to cost them big. Pete Carroll looks like the next coach.
The Jets fans are whining that they shouldn't have to pay anything to
the Pats and that they are committing blackmail.
mike
|
56.2891 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:20 | 7 |
|
You know back in my day, Kraft would have been a man about it and cut Parcells
loose and kicked his butt on the field. Now it's all sleezeball politics, and
mudsling in the papers hiding behind some law written for skirts. It's a shame
what they done to the game.........
mc
|
56.2892 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:29 | 4 |
|
Back in your day they wore leather helmets. I suppose they should
still do things that way, too...
|
56.2893 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:41 | 6 |
| It's not just a matter of releasing Parcells so he can coach somewhere else.
It's a question of what Kraft wants in return. If he can get the #1 pick, why
just throw it away? If they won't give up the #1 pick then why not try for
the best you can get?
George
|
56.2894 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:44 | 9 |
|
re .2891,
MC, I think that if Parcells was nice about the whole situation and
didn't try and play hardball with Kraft. Bob Kraft would have let
Parcells go without compensation. Since Parcells made it personal,
Kraft is just showing Bill that he can play hardball too.
Ron
|
56.2895 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:54 | 5 |
| Well, I don't know about that. Read the Sunday Boston Globe article about
Kraft. According to that article he always plays hard ball. That pretty much
agrees with what I've heard in other places as well.
George
|
56.2896 | Po Po Leon Hess | CSLALL::BRULE | Smack the Pack | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:58 | 7 |
| How many multi-millionaires don't play hardball? YOu don't become
extremly rich giving things away. Parcells tucked it to Kraft and the
Pats during the Super Bowl week by having his favorite clown Wil
McDonough write his article about how he's going to leave and Kraft
cann't stop him. Payback is a bitch.
Mike
|
56.2897 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 09:59 | 7 |
| You don't get to where Kraft is without knowing how to play
hardball. He's making the right move here and the Jets will pony
up the #1 as well as a player I'd venture. Both of these guys are
egotistical megalomaniacs. Neither picked each other. The fact
that they can't get along shouldn't be a big surprise.
daryll
|
56.2898 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:21 | 10 |
| From Kraft's point of view, asking for the #1 pick makes sense. If the Jets
are desperate he just might get it. If not, at least he starts the negotiation
at a point which sends the message Parcells won't come cheap.
However if I were the Jets I wouldn't give up much of anything. They aren't
going to accomplish much of anything next year anyway, just hire an intrim
coach with the understanding that he's just there for 1 year, use the #1 pick
or trade it as you see fit, then next year hire the Tuna.
George
|
56.2899 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:20 | 12 |
|
I never once said that what Kraft was doing was stupid, I just said it ain't
man-ly! I love how everyone conviently ignores the fact that Kraft fired the
first volley in this pissin' contest not Parcells. It so conviently forgotten.
My B-I-L who's a season ticket holder told me three weeks ago that Parcells
walked on water, yesterday he told me what bum he was. COuldn't draft to save
his ass or evaluate talent etc.
I wonder what these same fans are going to say about Kraft when he drops the
soap to them on his way to greener pastures??????
mc
|
56.2900 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:28 | 1 |
| What volley was that Mike?
|
56.2901 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:39 | 1 |
| that Parcells' was leaving and Drewenia couldn't be happier....
|
56.2902 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:44 | 1 |
| Is Kraft going to do the smart thing and promote Bellichek?
|
56.2903 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:51 | 29 |
| RE <<< Note 56.2899 by PECAD8::CHILDS "Steelers get a pants-down spanking" >>>
> I never once said that what Kraft was doing was stupid, I just said it ain't
> man-ly! I love how everyone conviently ignores the fact that Kraft fired the
> first volley in this pissin' contest not Parcells. It so conviently forgotten.
You mean Kraft fired the 1st of the volley's that became public. Who knows
how many volleys they fired at each other behind closed doors or at each other
in the political realm of the Patriots front office before something got leaked
to the press by one side or the other? Most likely this is the result of a
battle that's been going on for months if not years.
One thing Parcells said was correct, Kraft is the owner. It's his team to
do with as he sees fit. Most likely if Parcells had gone along with coaching
the 5th year doing things Kraft's way, none of this would have happened.
Parcells as much as said he wasn't happy "If they want you to do the cooking
at least you should be able to shop for some of the groceries, all right?"
From that point of view, if Parcells was the one causing the problems. Being
the boss, when Kraft says jump, Parcells only job is to ask how high. It
appears Parcells was not willing to do that which lead to the problems.
It also appears that he didn't understand his contract and agreed to talk
to the Jets with one year of commitment to the Pats and Kraft sill remaining.
Under those circumstances I really don't see where Kraft is obliged to roll
over. Why not try to get what ever the Jets will cough up?
The only Kraft is not being man-ly is if man-ly == stupid.
George
|
56.2904 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:46 | 23 |
|
>> However if I were the Jets I wouldn't give up much of anything.
>> They aren't going to accomplish much of anything next year anyway,
>> just hire an intrim coach with the understanding that he's just
>> there for 1 year, use the #1 pick or trade it as you see fit, then
>> next year hire the Tuna.
Part of what makes the Jets job so appealing to Tuna is that they
have a core of very good young players. Maybe not quite as good as
the Pats but actually pretty close. Marvin Jones, Hugh Douglas,
Keyshawn Johnson and I remember reading that Tuna was a big
Kyle Brady fan. Tuna has also said that Carolina and Jacksonville
have shown that the time it takes to build a championship-calibre
team has shortened from roughly four years to roughly two. That
makes one year *huge*. Still, I think whether to sacrifice the #1
for Tuna may be a tougher decison for the Tuna than it is for the
Jets. Tuna wants that #1 as much as he wants to start building a
champion because that #1 figures to be an intergral part. And I
don't think he wants Peyton Manning with it. The Jets want Tuna
now and the list of guys who'd take a job for one year is short
and insulting to Jets fans. There's more interest in the Jets just
on the basis of specualtion that Tuna might be coming than there has
been in years. Sort of like the Pats used to be.
|
56.2905 | smart? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:52 | 3 |
| > Is Kraft going to do the smart thing and promote Bellichek?
I thought Pete Carroll is gonna get the job?
|
56.2906 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:48 | 5 |
|
Pete Carroll might be signed as early as today. I don't
want Bellicheck. I caught his act in Cleveland and was
unimpressed. He's a good defensive coach but that's about
the extent of his talents.
|
56.2907 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:49 | 1 |
| that'd be a stupid idea imo.
|
56.2908 | another vote for dumb | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:00 | 9 |
| Carroll is just another in a long line of Coordinators who have proven
they caint run the whole show. For ever Mike Holmgren who successfully
makes the leap, there's a bunch of Buddy Ryans.
And the Raiders seem to be making the same mistake with Bugel.
It's definitely the Peter Principle at work.
TTom
|
56.2909 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:58 | 2 |
| Carroll is a stupid move imho. Any coach who can go to the playoffs
every year with Testaverde at QB deserves another chance.
|
56.2910 | not too good there | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:02 | 8 |
| Talk about danging with faint praise.
You really caint laud someone who'd have Vinnie in the firsted place.
In the seconded place, someone else took him under his wing and Vinnie
went to the Pro Bowl.
TTom
|
56.2911 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:05 | 19 |
| Mike,
What qualifies as "man-ly" with you kills me. Kraft is sticking
to his guns. He's in the position of power here and he's not the
type to let that upperhand go unused. Kiam and Sullivan would
bent over and let Parcells go with no compensation. Hell,
Sullivan probably would've probably lost a player or pick as
well. Got a soft spot for ineptness or something?
Parcells wanted his contract renegotiated and Kraft said no problem.
Problem is, Kraft is a better business man that Parcells. Bill walks out
thinking he's free to go anywhere he pleases after this season
and then, during the SB of all times, decided to feed that
suck-up McDonough with his side of the story. But, turns out that
Bob happens to know what he's doing and he's got Tuna by the
shorthairs. Bob Kraft is looking out for his best interest.
In my book, that'll qualify as "man-ly".
daryll
|
56.2912 | I think the #1 request is a little clearer to me now... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:14 | 14 |
| . Still, I think whether to sacrifice the #1
. for Tuna may be a tougher decison for the Tuna than it is for the
. Jets. Tuna wants that #1 as much as he wants to start building a
. champion because that #1 figures to be an intergral part.
And this, I believe, is the beauty of it for Kraft. Taking the
thing away from Parcells that would hit closest to home. "Sure,
you can have the great coach, but I want some of the best raw material
he'd have to work with."
If the Jets cough up the pick, they've paid dearly. And if they don't,
there's a good chance they lose a year in their rebuilding effort,
and Mr. Dwayne Parcells goes a year without doing what he likes best.
|
56.2913 | :-) | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:22 | 8 |
| <<< Note 56.2912 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "A great face for radio..." >>>
> If the Jets cough up the pick, they've paid dearly.
Apparently, you having been paying attention to the Jet's
last few 1st rd picks.
daryll
|
56.2914 | so what? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:30 | 9 |
| > Apparently, you having been paying attention to the Jet's
> last few 1st rd picks.
That's what I've been thinking, daryll.
So the Jets lose a firsted round draft pick. So what? At least their fans
will get something outta it fer a change.
TTom
|
56.2915 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:55 | 6 |
|
I like hearing the Jets fans moan every year no matter who
the Jets pick. The year they pciked Jeff Lageman in the first
round set some sort of record for whining. Of course, Jeff
is still in the league almost ten years later but no one ever
accused Jets fans of being the most astute bunch.
|
56.2916 | considering what the Jets draft, ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 11:58 | 4 |
| When you pick Ken O'Brien over Dan Marino, I'd say it's the front office
of the Jets that won't be confused with astute.
TTom
|
56.2917 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 12:02 | 5 |
|
There's a long list of guys who were taken before Marino that
year. Ken O'Brien isn't the biggest stiff on it either. Not that
I'm defending the Jets drafting ability but Marino slipped by a few
folks.
|
56.2918 | not lonesome | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 12:11 | 4 |
| All that tells me is that there are other stupid front offices in the
league. The Jets evidently don't have a monopoly.
TTom
|
56.2919 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Feb 03 1997 12:23 | 3 |
| cut the BS there's youngin's in here. It wasn't stupidy it was the tootsie
problem that Danny had his senior year that dropped his stock. No self respectin
good ole boy wanted a cokehaid runin his team.........
|
56.2920 | '83 QB's | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Feb 03 1997 13:19 | 14 |
| Is that right Mike? I didn't know that? Who was from that
famed class anyway???
Todd Blackledge
Jim Kelly
Tony Eason
Jim O'Brien
John Elway
Dan marino
Does that about do it? I remember Marino was drafted after all
of them. Blackledge was the biggest bust.
Tony
|
56.2921 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 13:28 | 26 |
|
>> All that tells me is that there are other stupid front
>> offices in the league.
Or that the draft is almost as much instinct as science.
There was no way of knowing that Marino would go on to
have the career he had. I'm sure not even Miami expected
it. Some guys have a knack for the draft and some guys
play it by the book and some guys just continually screw
it up. Jimmy Johnson's made his rep picking future all-pro's
in rounds 3-7. Guys that anyone could have taken but didn't.
He has that ability. Which brings us back to Tuna, who doesn't.
The thing that sent Tuna packing is that he wanted full control
of the draft when Kraft had an organization in place to perform
that function. Tuna wanted a d-linmen when the Patsies had
Glenn rated way above everyone else on the board. Word is that
when that happened Tuna stormed out of the draft room and the
Pats went on ot take Lawyer Milloy, Teddy Bruschi, etc. We
had a great draft last year. If we'd listened to Tuna we probably
wouldn't have. Kraft said that the reason he didn't give Parcells
full control is that he didn't want the organizaion hanging on
one man because he knew that Tuna was here for the shorthaul
and Kraft was in it for the longhaul. If anyone comes out of
this smelling like a rose, it's director of personnel Bobby
Grier. Kraft stood by him and his team and he made Kraft look
good.
|
56.2922 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 13:30 | 2 |
|
It's Ken O'Brien but other than that the list is right.
|
56.2924 | New Coach | FRSBEE::GROVES | | Mon Feb 03 1997 13:46 | 3 |
|
According to USA TODAY, Pete Carroll agreed to a 5-year contract. No
other details were dicussed.
|
56.2923 | whatever it is, the Jets don't have it | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 13:58 | 11 |
| > Or that the draft is almost as much instinct as science.
Use whatever word you want but it comes down to the same reality.
The Jets lack whatever it takes in the draft while others seem to
consistently do well.
Besides O'Brien, the Jets also passed over Jerry Rice. I know that like
Marino so did a lot of other teams but them being similarly impeded
doesn't make the Jets any smarter, better, luckier or more instictual.
TTom
|
56.2925 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:08 | 8 |
|
>> The Jets lack whatever it takes in the draft while others
>> seem to consistently do well.
I don't disagree but I don't think that not taking Rice
or Marino is the proper evidence. If someone had told you
before the draft that either one would be the greatest ever
at his position would you have believed him?
|
56.2926 | or just plain bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:17 | 15 |
| I din't see Marino that much in college but it din't take too many looks
at the highlights of Mississippi Valley St to see that Rice could play.
But here's the point: the Jets haven't got it done in *ALL* ways. They
have a history of drafting people who at best don't turn out. They sign
big name, big dollar FAs - e.g., O'Donnell - who don't earn their keep.
I will grant them this: they are about as unlucky a sprots team this side
of the LA Clippers. Unlike the Clippers who are showing some signs of
life thised year, the Jets have no such rosey outlook.
And, of course, the Jets do not have the market on any of this cornered.
There are plenty of middling to bad franchises throughout sprots.
TTom
|
56.2927 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:18 | 10 |
|
I seem to remember that up until about 4 years ago, I thought
the Patriots drafted bad. Didn't the Pats head of scouting or
something like that, (Steinberg) leave the Pats and go to the Jets?
Funny quote from Pete Carroll at todays press conference. They
asked him about having control and the grocery comment Parcells made.
He responds with, When I go food shopping with my wife, all I do is
push the carriage around.
Ron
|
56.2928 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:26 | 4 |
| Well the Jets must have done something right at some point. They did win
Superbowl III (or what ever it was called back then).
George
|
56.2929 | easy to answer | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:28 | 4 |
| Yeah, they had a guy who was smart enough to get Joe Namath and then
build a good team around him.
TTom
|
56.2930 | The there's the Falcons | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's around here somewhere | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:33 | 8 |
| The team logo next to the word "inept" in the dictionary is that of the
Falcons.
Now we have Reeves, who couldn't win the big one with Elway, in charge
of the whole shootin' match, no QB, and a defense that couldn't stop a
passing attack led by a decent HS QB.
UMDan
|
56.2931 | good nominee | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:37 | 14 |
| Hey, UMDan,
We gots ya a QB: Heath Shuler. He's a Falcon kinda guy, dontcha think.
And I think you'll be able to get 'im for less that 4 mil.
But your right about the Falcons.
Another good example of how not to run a team had been the Minnesota
Timberwolves who shared none of the success of their fellow expansion
teams - Charlotte, Orlando, Miami. Then they finally realize you need
someone who actually knows something about the game, they hire McHale and
I'm on a_easy ride for the over 28 wins for the season.
TTom
|
56.2932 | "Sorry Charlie..." | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:54 | 5 |
| Thanks Tommy and I couldn't agree more with .2922. Excellent
reply. Almost as good as mine! ;-)
Too bad Tuna's ego is so good. Maybe his first name ought to
be Charlie...
|
56.2933 | Correction: "is so BIG" (man!) | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:55 | 1 |
|
|
56.2934 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 15:07 | 2 |
| Roger Vick
|
56.2935 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 15:07 | 1 |
| Johnny Mitchell
|
56.2936 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Mon Feb 03 1997 15:12 | 1 |
| Ryan Yarborough
|
56.2937 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's around here somewhere | Mon Feb 03 1997 15:28 | 6 |
| Seeing as how my former "Home Team" was the 'Skins, I'm not sure that I
want to see Shuler here. He could be a good one, but he needs a good
QB coach. On the other hand, maybe he could use a baptism by fire, and
at the Falcons, he'd get it fer sure!
UMDan
|
56.2938 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Mon Feb 03 1997 17:03 | 3 |
|
If Kraft wants a 500 team he'll do the "smart" thing and promote
Bellichek <--- not a head coach.
|
56.2939 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Feb 03 1997 17:25 | 5 |
| > Back in your day they wore leather helmets. I suppose they should
> still do things that way, too...
They should. Plastic helmets ruined football.
|
56.2940 | turned them into weapons | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Feb 04 1997 08:52 | 3 |
|
that sissy's could hid behind and stick guys in the back while they aren't
looking........
|
56.2941 | now we know | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 04 1997 11:54 | 11 |
| Lo, the circle is complete.
The Jets have hired Bill Belichick as their main main.
Way back when, I thought Belichick was the heir apparent to Tuna. I guess
that plan moved.
And then it became evident that he weren't to be the new Pats head coach
so I was wondering about his fate.
TTom
|
56.2942 | Wonder what this does for Kraft's ego? | HYMIE::SALMON | | Tue Feb 04 1997 12:36 | 1 |
| All of a sudden two 2nd rounders is looking pretty good!
|
56.2943 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Feb 04 1997 12:46 | 3 |
|
he's probably happy because the skirt knew Parcell's Jets would kick the
Pattys' butts.........
|
56.2944 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Feb 04 1997 12:53 | 4 |
| On the news they were saying the Jets had to name a coach so he's the guy
they named. They still want the Tuna.
George
|
56.2945 | Hahahahaha... the man is a hardass... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 04 1997 13:05 | 9 |
|
> On the news they were saying the Jets had to name a coach so he's the guy
> they named. They still want the Tuna.
"If they want to give us Hugh Douglas, Keyshawn Johnson and Aaron
Glenn, we'd think about it".
Bob Kraft, on compensation for Parcells
|
56.2946 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Tue Feb 04 1997 13:14 | 13 |
|
Word from the Jests is " You'll get nothing and like it!"
So Belicheck gets the nod, and Tuna becomes the main main nexted
year. No chance of Tuna doing a little covert assistance during
97. Caint blame Velveeta (kraft) for tryin to get something for
nuthin.
Shark
|
56.2947 | So says Kraft will get nothing? | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:02 | 3 |
| Now then, about those tampering charges.....
|
56.2948 | probably headed for court | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:12 | 5 |
| Tampering could've happened as early as when Parcells negotiated down
his contract term.
Kraft is going to look like the fool if he gets no compensation for
Parcells or Belichick.
|
56.2949 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:14 | 13 |
| The Jets are also talking about tampering with respect
to Kraft naming three players as possible compensation.
According to ESPNet and the Jets news conference, Parcells
is going to be a consultant this year and take over coaching
and all football operations next February, unless something
is worked out with the Pats before then.
Looks like the next move is up to the Pats. I'm not sure
how Parcells "consulting" with Steve Gutman isn't a violation
of the contract amendment, however.
Mike
|
56.2950 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:18 | 7 |
| As for the Jets tampering, I think that they decided
to let their actions speak for them by not interviewing
anyone for the position. The Jets really had nothing to
lose (other than a shot at Bobby Ross) by waiting.
If anyone made contact early, I'd put my money on Parcells
and his agent. They have a history of doing it.
|
56.2951 | shoulda offered Kotite | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:41 | 9 |
| I think that the Jets really screwed this thing up.
They shoulda gone ahead and tampered all they wanted to with Tuna.
Then they coulda claimed Rich Kotite was gonna be the compensation.
Kotite is definitely worth a firsted round pick, to the other team,
anyway.
TTom
|
56.2952 | They'll get the number one | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:41 | 5 |
|
Is consulting considered a football type positon? If so I expect
Taglibue to dress down the Jets for this.
|
56.2953 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:46 | 10 |
| I can see Parcells consulting with Gutman during the draft:
"Another doughnut, Bill?"
"No thanks, I trying to PACE myself."
Sounds like they should present a couple of proposals to
an arbitrator for compenstation and be done with it.
Mike
|
56.2954 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Feb 04 1997 15:16 | 1 |
| Reportedly, Parcells wants Manning for when he takes over next year.
|
56.2955 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Feb 04 1997 16:05 | 8 |
|
Kraft mentioned Douglass, Glenn and Johnson in the context of a
joke, thus no tampering. Possible just a reminder from Tagliabue not
to mention names, even in passing/joking. On the other hand the Jets
are openly trying to circumvent Parcells contract with the Patriots,
as well as the ruling Tagliabue made last week, BIG TIME TAMPERING.
Ron
|
56.2956 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Feb 04 1997 16:22 | 2 |
| But the Jets are hoping to force Tagliabue's hand and get him to set a
price. The #1 of all picks is far too steep.
|
56.2957 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Feb 04 1997 16:30 | 6 |
| >> But the Jets are hoping to force Tagliabue's hand and get him to set a
>> price. The #1 of all picks is far too steep.
Why? Look at all of the hoops the Jets are willing to jump through
to get Tuna including flaunting the commish's ruling? Looks like
he's worth the first pick to me.
|
56.2958 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 04 1997 16:48 | 6 |
|
Bill Belichick must have little to no pride to be pawned around
like this...
glenn
|
56.2959 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Tue Feb 04 1997 17:46 | 5 |
| Not only the Belichick angle, but how do you think the players are
going to respond knowing he's only there for a year! The whole thing
is pretty bizzare.
Steve
|
56.2960 | | tunsrv2-tunnel.imc.das.dec.com::dfaust | Dennis Faust | Tue Feb 04 1997 18:43 | 15 |
| I must be missing something. The Commish ruled that Parcell could only coach
for the Pats next year. The Jets haven't hired him to be a coach, just a
consultant. Howexactly does this constitute disobeying Tags ruling?
I do believe that the Jets tampered, however, since they have a history of
doing it in the past. They tampered with Kotite when he was with the Eagles,
but the stupid Eagles never persued it with the NFL. Maybe the Eagles knew
they would never get a favorable ruling from the NFL and that's why they let
it drop.
I really think that Kraft blew it, since he get stuck with a lot of nothing,
unles he seriously caves in and let the jets have him for a considerably
reduced cost.
Dennis Faust
|
56.2961 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Tue Feb 04 1997 21:27 | 14 |
| I don't think Kraft blew anything. What he lost was Parcells coaching
in the 5th year. Now that someone is knocking on his door to retain
Bill's services, Kraft has some bargaining power. He isn't paying Bill
to coach next year, as would be the case if Bill was fired and didn't
get another coaching job. Bill's not coaching, and Bob's not paying.
Fair deal. Now if the Jets want Bill, they have to appease Bob's
demands. If they don't, Bob won't agree to let Bill go.
Now that this consulting thing has come up, I think it's an overt
attempt by the Jets to force Kraft's hand and to get the league
involved. I believe Kraft is undoubtedly caucusing with his legal
staff over this turn of events to see what his options are.
Ted
|
56.2962 | happy with Kraft's dealings... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Feb 05 1997 08:47 | 26 |
| RE: .2960
Dennis,
I think the interpretation might have been broader than "Parcells can't
*coach* for another team in 1997". I believe it was more like "he
can't actively participate in the workings of another team in 1997".
He's not supposed to have anything to do with the football operations of
another team.
I'm pretty happy with the way Kraft has handled this - he's indicated
that he won't let himself (or the Patriots) get walked over. My only
fear is that Tagliabue will cave in considerably given that it's time
to negotiate the new TV contract and he wants to keep New York and its
fans happy. I wish the Jets would get their collective pee-pees
spanked by Tagliabue for trying to show him up.
If the Pats end up with *anything*, it's that much more than what they
would have had. It's a no-lose situation - the worst you do is break
even. Parcells was gone regardless.
-Roland
P.S. And for anyone who doesn't believe the Jets were tampering, I've
got a stadium in a swamp that I'd like to sell you...
|
56.2963 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:20 | 15 |
|
> I really think that Kraft blew it, since he get stuck with a lot of nothing,
> unles he seriously caves in and let the jets have him for a considerably
> reduced cost.
He's got Parcells in the position of de facto GM of the Jets, which
given Parcells' track record could pay dividends to the Pats down
the road. The man is only a threat when he's standing on the
sidelines.
How long until Neil O'Donnell is dumped? You know he's not a "Bill
Parcells-type" player...
glenn
|
56.2964 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:23 | 8 |
|
You got it love it. YesMyra (tm - for butch on the cape) talked tough and got
it handed to him. The ruling stated imo that no football decisions could be
made by Parcells as a consultant he only advises he doesn't make the ultimate
decision and hence YesMyra gets caught with his Pants down as does
Taligibue........
mc
|
56.2965 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:27 | 16 |
|
>> He's got Parcells in the position of de facto GM of the Jets, which
>> given Parcells' track record could pay dividends to the Pats down
>> the road. The man is only a threat when he's standing on the
>> sidelines.
>> How long until Neil O'Donnell is dumped? You know he's not a "Bill
>> Parcells-type" player...
Exactly what I was thinking on both counts. Let Bill be their
personnel guy. The Jets don't have any cap room as it is, letting
Bill loose will only screw them until Haley's Comet returns.
Here he had Bobby Grier to save him from himself. Down in New
York, it'll be interesting to see if Parcells' lips move when
Bellicheck talks. And O'Donnell is a goner especially at his salary.
If Bill could, he'd dope slap whoever signed Neil.
|
56.2966 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:43 | 8 |
|
Why isn't OD a Parcells' type guy? Superbowl aside he's been a low-turnover
guy who doesn't audiable much and doesn't try to do things he's uncapable
of. He can handle critism or atleast could when in Pitt. While he's probably
not happy with his salary why cut him when the contract is quaranteed. OD
can get you there but can he win it is another matter......
mike
|
56.2967 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:57 | 9 |
|
> Why isn't OD a Parcells' type guy?
He's a big sissy, without the physical skills of a Drew Bledsoe to at
least partially make up for it. Of course his stats are high-percentage;
if it isn't there he hits the turf and takes the sack.
glenn
|
56.2968 | Looney Tunes | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's around here somewhere | Wed Feb 05 1997 10:12 | 10 |
| All you Jets fans better start calling the front office now, before
they seriously consider hiring Falcons ex-GM (VP of Player Ops) Ken
Herock. He of the Audrey Bruce draft (#1), Brett Favre trade and Jeff
George debacle.
Parcells the puppetmaster and Herock the personnel man. And here I
thought the Falcons had a lock on the bottom rung.
UMDan
|
56.2969 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Feb 05 1997 10:39 | 7 |
| O'Donnell in the biggest Steeler game in 15 years didn't play any sissy
role. He was the one with the guts, standing in the pocket and having
to throw pin-point passes to tightly guarded receivers.
As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
caused the breakdown and final interception. That interception never
happens under Parcells.
|
56.2970 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 05 1997 10:43 | 11 |
|
> As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
> caused the breakdown and final interception. That interception never
> happens under Parcells.
Right. That's why Parcells abandoned the running game in Super Bowl
XXXI to a far greater extent than Cowher would ever think of, and
Bledsoe throws four picks. Get a clue billte...
glenn
|
56.2971 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Feb 05 1997 10:56 | 14 |
|
I'm still wondering how he got:
> As Mikey says it was poor coaching that set up the situation which
> caused the breakdown and final interception.
out of the line "Superbowl aside...." ?????????
especially when I argued that Neil ala Drew Blewit caved in to soon on the play
last year and paniced. Also like Drew Blewit blaming the receiver for missing
the read and not hisself............
mc
|
56.2972 | now here's some real folly | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:26 | 10 |
| The Pats and Jets are pretenders.
Oakland is showing that it's the real idjit in the league. Firsted of
all, they promote a proven non-winner as a haid coach.
Now they're going for Jeff George.
Hoss is gonna be cut loose and possibly going to the Burgh.
TTom
|
56.2973 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:24 | 14 |
| Glenn how can you compare the interception vs Dallas with any of the
interceptions that Bledsoe had. Parcells made a strategy decision
based on his only fullback he could depend on being out. He felt he
could put 21-27 points on the board and did hit the low number. He
hoped that special teams and defense could hold GreenBay and was wrong.
Cowher had a running game but panicked late and had O'Donnell is risky
passing situations without the authority to play call his way out of
them. Parcells understands that if you have to put it in the air a lot
it will be intercepted but you can't afford those interceptions in the
flat which Cowher teams do so often.
Mikey you had said something I agreed with but you're right not in the
context I put you in.
|
56.2974 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:42 | 10 |
|
>> That's why Parcells abandoned the running game in Super Bowl
>> XXXI to a far greater extent than Cowher would ever think of,
>> and Bledsoe throws four picks.
A) Parcells pulled Cowher's underwear up over his head when
their two teams met in the playoffs to the tune of 28-3 and
B) it ain't Tuna's fault or because of a lack of a running
game that Drew overthrew and underthrew receiver after receiver.
|
56.2975 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:49 | 22 |
|
> A) Parcells pulled Cowher's underwear up over his head when
> their two teams met in the playoffs to the tune of 28-3 and
Non sequitur. I wasn't comparing the overall coaching caliber of
these two. Just pointing out that Parcells quit on the running
game, and (with a flawed or inexperienced QB), interceptions are
the price.
> B) it ain't Tuna's fault or because of a lack of a running
> game that Drew overthrew and underthrew receiver after receiver.
Likewise O'D's two horrendous decisions/passes weren't Cowher's fault.
Except in billte's foggy memory, that is. In the clutch it'll all
happen again for O'D under Parcells, if Parcells sticks with him that
is.
O'D was sucking up pretty good to Parcells yesterday, I have to admit.
glenn
|
56.2976 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Feb 05 1997 12:21 | 9 |
| RE: Raiders
>Now they're going for Jeff George.
>Hoss is gonna be cut loose and possibly going to the Burgh.
aaaaaarrrrrrrrgggggggghhhhhhhhh
Marc
|
56.2977 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Feb 05 1997 13:31 | 6 |
|
Jeff George seems like a perfect Raider fit. A guy nobody
else wants, who probably doesn't even get along with his own
mother and will be fighting with everyone from the opposing
d-line to his own equipment manager. It's a match made in
heaven.
|
56.2978 | RE: Odonnell... | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Thu Feb 06 1997 02:09 | 7 |
| RE: .2966
>(Odonnell) doesn't try to do things he's incapable of<
Sure he does. He plays QB:)!
Gary S
|
56.2979 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Feb 06 1997 09:03 | 5 |
| Surely we haven't gone from "O'Donnell blew the Superbowl with a stupid
pass" to O'Donnell is a poor quarterback? Surely none of the standard
Steeler contingent thinks the latter and even Tommy Brydie, who rightly
questions O'Donnell's judgement doesn't seem to think that O'Donnell is
less than one of the better quarterbacks around.
|
56.2980 | "One of the better QBs"? Shrooms away... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 06 1997 11:17 | 12 |
|
> Steeler contingent thinks the latter and even Tommy Brydie, who rightly
> questions O'Donnell's judgement doesn't seem to think that O'Donnell is
> less than one of the better quarterbacks around.
Huh? At his most glowing maybe Tommy raised the bar to "mediocre".
He beat him up as a Steeler and remained consistent as he moved to
the Jets. You've got to stop speaking for Childs and Brydie and the
like from this position of yours in the Alternate Universe, billte...
glenn
|
56.2981 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Feb 06 1997 11:39 | 6 |
|
I figured O'Donnell was "good enough" for a Jets team
that I feel has a lot of very good young talent. But OD
revealed himself as a gutless punk over the course of the
last year or so. Like I said about Bledsoe, I can deal with
stupid but scared is another matter.
|
56.2982 | Media won't be ultimate judge of O'Donnell | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Feb 06 1997 11:57 | 11 |
| Well I haven't seen that side of O'Donnell. Certainly I didn't see it
in the Superbowl of 1996.
Glenn, given the unanimity of the Steeler contingent on O'Donnell I
blame it on these newsletters you all subscribe to: Lambert's letter,
Bradshaw's nose, Jack Hams down and dirty latest Pitt skinny.
We have all these lovely myths: Switzer can't coach, O'Donnell is a
coward, Parcells is a genius, Cowher can coach... Leaving sprotsters
out of the mix if you follow the popular media interpretations you are
dealing with fairy tales.
|
56.2983 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 06 1997 13:15 | 11 |
|
> Glenn, given the unanimity of the Steeler contingent on O'Donnell I
> blame it on these newsletters you all subscribe to: Lambert's letter,
> Bradshaw's nose, Jack Hams down and dirty latest Pitt skinny.
I have no idea what the hail you're talking about. I subscribe to
*zero* Steeler newsletters. I do subscribe to the NFL's Sunday Ticket
and actually watch the games though...
glenn
|
56.2984 | Here's a game to watch | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Feb 06 1997 13:36 | 4 |
| Glenn you may want to watch a certain Hartford - Bruins contest
tonight. A win by the Bruins puts them ahead of Hartford although the
usually reliable Ms Karen O' Derry didn't post the standings this early
am. Maybe the shock of me roaring past her in da pool hasn't worn off.
|
56.2985 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Feb 06 1997 15:24 | 3 |
| But Bill, the point is still moot as the Whalers have a game in hand.
|
56.2986 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Feb 06 1997 16:19 | 3 |
| I didn't know that Frank. Karen didn't post the standings, probably
slept in after a particularly late night or something. Hope she wasn't
hitting the action in Clinton.
|
56.2987 | still off the subject but.... | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Fri Feb 07 1997 03:28 | 8 |
| RE: .2979
Nope. I'm not basing my assessment on the Superbowl. I have never in
his history felt that O'donnell was any good. I never thought he was a
coward, though. It takes guts to pretend to be a QB and make millions
of dollars in the NFL:)!
Gary S.
|
56.2988 | | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Fri Feb 07 1997 05:50 | 2 |
| Yo, Billte... as always, the standings get posted on Monday morning.
Spark up another...
|
56.2989 | slapped back down again. | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Fri Feb 07 1997 08:42 | 3 |
| I don't think Bill wants to see them anymore.
daryll
|
56.2990 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Fri Feb 07 1997 15:19 | 6 |
| In case anyone's wondering I told Glenn back in December that I was
going to bet Frank Way that the B's would beat out the Whalers in the
end. Glenn said forget Frank I'll take you on and give you 2:1.
This is the second time the B's have started to close in and then blew
it. All in all: O'Donnell > Kaspar
|
56.2991 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Fri Feb 07 1997 15:21 | 1 |
| Do try not to confuse "blew it" with "outplayed" again.
|
56.2992 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Feb 07 1997 15:37 | 10 |
|
RE: All in all: O'Donnell > Kaspar
Finally - Steve Kasper's main apologist begins to come to his senses.
Of course, there's an infinitely long left side of the expression that
has been left out...
[...] small furry rodent .GT. Elway .GT. O'Donnell .GT. Kasper
|
56.2993 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Feb 10 1997 09:04 | 4 |
| Well, Homer Votaire Plato, I think he's got it....finally...
|
56.2994 | Congratulations Mr Kraft | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Feb 11 1997 09:47 | 10 |
| I think Kraft engineered quite a ploy. First he gets rid of a coach he
doesn't want for personal reasons pretty well covered elsewhere. He
pulls it off in such a way that the coach makes his deal telling the
new team that he won't require compensation. Kraft then convinces the
commish that the writing indeed says "permission" eg compensation.
Finally, he willingly plays the fool for the greater good by blabbing
about #1 in the land and Keyshawn, Douglas or fight when his objective
is to raise the ante in the bargaining as high as possible.
Result: Four draft choices for essentially nothing.
|
56.2995 | snookered | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 10:13 | 5 |
| I'm with you on this one, billte.
And I think Kraft oughta be ashamed snookering that ol' Leon Hess.
TTom
|
56.2996 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 11 1997 10:27 | 12 |
|
> Result: Four draft choices for essentially nothing.
Yep. The irony is that the Pats only hit this jackpot because
Parcells helped take them to the Super Bowl. Say, had the Pats not
made the playoffs, it was pretty much expected that Parcells would
have been hitting the road at the end of the season, free and clear,
no questions asked. The dispute around all of this evolved as the
Pats advanced deeper into the playoffs.
glenn
|
56.2997 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Feb 11 1997 10:32 | 5 |
|
So much for the league wanting to make the Jets' stronger that all the local
yahoos on the radio thought was going to happen.
mc
|
56.2998 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Feb 11 1997 10:36 | 5 |
| Well if Parcells uses his 1st picks well this year and next and has the Jets
in playoff contention by 1999 that 1st round pick 3 years out is not going to
be all that much of a loss.
George
|
56.2999 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:36 | 15 |
|
>> Well if Parcells uses his 1st picks well this year and next
>> and has the Jets in playoff contention by 1999 that 1st round
>> pick 3 years out is not going to be all that much of a loss.
Parcells has the first pick in the draft. He'd have to be an
idiot to screw that up and Parcells is no idiot. Still, this
is a *great* deal for the Patsies. The 3rd and 4th round are
where the bargains come. The Jets 2nd rounder next year figures
to be a quality pick and in 1999 I don't care where the Jets
are supposed to pick a 1st rounder is very much of a loss be-
cause if your 1st rounder sucks, your 2nd rounder sucks that
much more. I think this deal is even better than the number one
overall for the Pats.
|
56.3000 | this *is* easy | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:53 | 8 |
| I think idiocy is something easily achieve.
Let's suppose he takes Payton Manning and he turns out to be the nexted
Heath Shuler.
As for this being a *great* deal, we most certainly agree on this.
TTom
|
56.3001 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:53 | 8 |
|
If Parcells drafts anyone but Orlando Pace, he's nuts.
BTW - after yesterday's press conference, does anyone
else think that Leon Hess ain't never gonna live
to see the Jets win the SB? Eeven if it's next
year?
|
56.3002 | Don't let the door hit ya... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:55 | 20 |
|
You never know, losing Parcells in this fashion could be one of the
best things ever to happen to this franchise, just as gaining him was.
If you believe in the "teach them how to win" philosophy, well, the
Pats already got that training from Parcells. As to taking them to
the next level, where there's some consistency and stability, maybe
Parcells isn't your man for that anyway.
The number and placement of these picks rivals what Dallas got for
Herschel Walker, for a team that's already a winner. Use them wisely,
and who knows how things turn out (of course there is a fair amount
of luck involved, with the draft).
I don't have any bitter feelings towards Parcells, but I have tired
of his act. This may be the start of a new era, and a very positive
one.
glenn
|
56.3003 | looking bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:10 | 8 |
| Next year? Hail, ol' Leon looks like he may not make it to spring
practices.
And Pace aint no sure bet. And certainly not quickly. There's a lot of
uncertainty in his position not the least of which are development and
injuries. FWIW, I think he should be a star, too, but whatta I know...
TTom
|
56.3004 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:24 | 13 |
| I dunno, I kinda thought Kraft looked like a boob. After all that babbling
about the #1 overall pick, and then naming the three Jets (super)star player,
he ends up with four draft picks.
Picks aren't bad, would have looked a lot better if he hadn't shot his mouth
off.
Be interesting to see what Parcells does, but I'm bettin' big that for the next
four years, the Jets do better overall than the Giants, *and* that they get
back to The Show before the Giants do.....
'Saw
|
56.3005 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:27 | 8 |
|
>> Picks aren't bad, would have looked a lot better if he hadn't
>> shot his mouth off.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease. If Kraft had gone along to get
along he probably wouldn't have gotten squat. Tagliabue knew he had
to appease Kraft and gave him a nice deal quite comparable to gett-
ing the number one overall.
|
56.3006 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:38 | 6 |
|
The Pats make out fantastic with this deal.
Squish the TunaFish!!!!!
- Sean
|
56.3007 | Jets in serious salary cap trouble | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is back - watch out NCAA! | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:03 | 13 |
| Jets right now are about $3 million over the salary cap. They must
sign the #1 pick, which will push them even further over the cap.
Unless they can get some sucker team to take Neil O'Donnell off their
hands, they will have to unload several talented players just to get
under the cap. Then, after Parcells brings in William Roberts, Dave
Meggett, and some of his other old buddies, they'll have to cut some
more players. Even given this, I think the Jets, with the Parcells push
and the easy schedule, will finish .500 next year, but slip to 6-10 or
so the following season.
NAZZ
|
56.3008 | quite the accomplishment | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:27 | 7 |
| If'n Tuna can get the Jets over .500 nexted year, he should win the NFL
COY.
I myself am not so optimistic. You have a systemic condition with the
Jets. The entire enterprise seems committed to losing.
TTom
|
56.3009 | What do I know | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Terps rising like a Phoenix! | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:45 | 6 |
| Didn't Pace refuse an MRI at the combine? Reports also say he hasn't
missed any meals since the Rose Bowl. Not saying that he may not turn
out great. But then again the Falcons thought Andrey(sp) Bruce was the
second coming of LT.
UMDan
|
56.3010 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:56 | 10 |
| So 'Saw (not to put words in your mouth, but) are you saying that if
you're Kraft you would have preferred to look good with a couple of 3s
rather than get 3,4,2,1 and not care what people think.
The number 1 overall was never a possibility within the football world.
Parcells never would have allowed it.
Then again there's the problem of all the lying. Could you imagine,
say, having to work someplace where people constantly say things which
time proves that they knew weren't true all along?
|
56.3011 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Feb 11 1997 14:17 | 12 |
|
> The number 1 overall was never a possibility within the football world.
> Parcells never would have allowed it.
This is yet to be seen.
Tagliabue may get what he most feared after all, just not this year.
Remember, this is BP controlling personell now. By the time his
overpriced underachieving picks drag the team down in a few years,
we may in fact be a Super Bowl team getting a #1 overall pick... :^)
- Sean
|
56.3012 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Feb 11 1997 14:21 | 15 |
|
> If'n Tuna can get the Jets over .500 nexted year, he should win the NFL
> COY.
This is the only thing that sort of bugs me. I think the Jets have
a pretty good team. There's a lot of hidden talent that went to waste.
In fact, I think the Jets win 8 games last year under practically any
other mediocre coach in the world.
BP couldn't have timed it better to come in and win 8 games, but it
will be a faux 8 wins in my book, better on paper, but not really
better than the team was this year. He'll come off like a savior,
though, that is, until the effect of his GM decisions kick in.
- Sean
|
56.3013 | we shall see | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 14:46 | 10 |
| I hear what you're saying, Sean.
Certainly, the Jets haplessness cannot be simply blamed on lack of
talent. However, certain questions loom large, like who'll play QB, who
will be sent home, who else is coming in, etc.
FWIW, If'n I were a p-name wagerer, I'd wager against .500. However, I
really don't that much concern about this issue...
TTom
|
56.3014 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Feb 11 1997 15:14 | 11 |
|
What Taglibue did was basically hold Leon Hess down while Kraft raped him and
Kraft still whined. What a wussy.
You guys make me laugh as far as you're concerned it's a given that Parcells
the GM will murder the Jets. It took Parcells a while to "get it" as a coach,
with any luck he's finally going to "get it" as a GM. For the JETS' sake I hope
so cause basically they've been forced to give up 4 starters for no good reason
at all.
mc
|
56.3015 | win-win | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Tue Feb 11 1997 15:26 | 10 |
| >What Taglibue did was basically hold Leon Hess down while Kraft raped him ...
And ol' Leon din't just lay back and enjoy it, neither.
Hey, I think this has to be viewed as a win-win situation. The Pats and
their faithful seem to be telling Tuna "don't go away mad, just go away."
And the Jets camp seems really elated, almost hopeful, that at the least
they have a coach who's been to the big dance 3 times and won twice.
TTom
|
56.3016 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Feb 11 1997 17:38 | 7 |
|
I think its a good deal for the Patriots. Parcells will only have
TWO seasons with the Jets, before he has to give up his #1 to the
Pats. I don't see Parcells taking a 1-15 team and reaching the playoffs
in 2 seasons. So the that #1 should be a top 20 pick.
Ron
|
56.3017 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:51 | 7 |
| The Pats were 1-15 and made the playoffs in 2 seasons.
Still, the Pats made out in this deal. Kraft may have
looked a little foolish backing down, but the Pats wouldn't
have gotten the same deal if he didn't kick and scream.
Mike
|
56.3018 | raise ticket prices | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:53 | 5 |
| and the word now is all the other teams are complaing to Tagliabue about
how this is gonna drive up the salaries that they're gonna have to pay
the other coaches
TTom
|
56.3019 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Wed Feb 12 1997 13:03 | 9 |
|
Ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!
What, this is a surprise to them?
I'm still hoping for the day when the whole kit and kaboodle comes
crashing down and we get to start over. Baseball's real close.
- Sean
|
56.3020 | maybe NBA | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Wed Feb 12 1997 13:09 | 13 |
| >Baseball's real close.
I think the NBA is there. They seem to be about maxed out and for the
firsted time I can remember, some players are taking a real cut in pay.
Walt Williams, Rex Chapman and some others went from millions to minimum,
a sign of possible fiscal management in the league.
With MLB, many in the ranks are getting fewer dollars than afore.
The problem is that in both cases those at the top end are still climbing
in salaries.
TTom
|
56.3021 | Baseball in a football note, oh my | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Terps rising like a Phoenix! | Wed Feb 12 1997 13:11 | 18 |
| "Baseball's real close" - we may have to move this discussion, but I
agree with this statement. Here in Atlanta they are about 10% behind
season ticket sales relative to where they were last year, and this
with a new Camden Yard/Jacob Field type park. Some folks who had $17
field level seats are now paying $20 for seats that are farther away or
$30 (yes $30) for seats in the same relative location.
And now that the Braves, not the county, are in charge of
concessions you won't be able to bring in your own food or beverages.
Looks like the amount of games I'm going to be able to attend is going
to go down this season.
Professional sports attendance is getting to be more and more a
corporate write-off type of occasion. Once the economy takes a dip
(always happens) and the corps get out, teams will fold. IMO, YMMV
UMDan
off
|