T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
35.1 | JMHO's | CELTIK::JACOB | Damn, guess I'll wait til nexted year | Thu Jan 03 1991 18:22 | 99 |
| For those of you who haved lived since 7:59pm Sunday in an isolated chamber and
have not heard the results, the Houston Oilers ended the Steelers season with a
good old fashioned a$$ whipping, 34-14, on Sunday night in front of a national
audience.
Cody Carlson, starting in place of the injured Warren Moon, played a game that
some QB's only dream about playing. He, and the Oiler offense, succeeded in
pounding the NFL's #1 defense for over 450 yards and a game that was only close
until Houston scored it's first TD. In a season where the Steeler offense was
either spectacular or non-existant, I got the feeling that it would be a long
night for the Black and Gold when Tim Worley fumbled the ball away on the
Steelers first play from scrimmage. houston converted that turnover into 7
points and the rout was on. The game was nowhere near as close as the 34-14
final indicates.
The Steeler Defense tied the NFL record for least TD's Passing allowed in a
season, finishing with 9, but three of those came in the final game.
As for the future for the Steelers, I offer this analysis.
Offense:
Tim Worley has shown some potential in his 2 years, but he can't stay healthy
long enough to show how he would be over the course of a season.
Aslo, Worley seems to have only 2 kinds of plays, good and bad. On a good
play, he gains 3 yards, on a bad play, he gains 3 yards and fumbles the ball
away.
Merrill Hoge will be with the Steelers for years to come. Doesn't have blazing
but nevertheless, is a strong running back who is durable.
Other running backs: Warren Williams is f and, after an early season bout with
fumblitis, was solid when replacing Worley. Barry Foster may eventually
unseat Worley.
At QB, Brister shows signs of being a good QB, but I still have reservations as
to whether he can get this team a Super Bowl ring. He needs to tone sown his
excitability and show some poise. He should also buy his mother a big screen
TV and a satelite dish so she can watch the games from home and not be shown so
damn much on TV worrying about her baby.
Tight Ends: Mike Mularkey remains consistent. He finds ways to get open and
is sure-handed, dropping very few passes.
Eric Green, barring injury, will play in the pro bowl someday as the starting
TE, mark my words. He is the best #1 offensive draft pick the Steelers
since the they took Louie Lipps.
Offensive Line: Played pretty good, will have to give Brister more time if the
Steelers are to make the playoffs next year.
Receivers:
Lipps had a good year but he is the only consistent receiver the Steelers have.
Derek Hill suffers from occasional bouts with lack of concentration, creating a
case of the dropsies. The rest of the receiving corp is marginally average.
DEFENSE:
The Steeler defense finished this year ranked near the top of the NFL.
The secondary gave up only 9 TD's via the pass this year, best in the NFL and
tying the all-time record.
Defensive Line:
The Steelers need a dominant pass rusher. Failure to pressure the QB in some
games this year contributed to losses.
Linebackers: Not Ham and Lambert but David Little made the pro bowl. Greg
Lloyd is a good pass rush linebacker, Bryan Hinkle still plays well. Not much
help needed here.
Secondary:Not much help will be needed here. The Steelers were 2nd in the NFL
this year in interceptions, trailing only the Bears.
Rod Woodson is one of the best cornerbacks in the game today. He was beaten
only once this year for a TD and that was in the final game against Houston.
He also made the pro bowl as a starting corner.
The rest of the secondary is also solid, save for maybe Dwayne Woodruff, who
may retire soon. The Steelers have left Woodruff unprotected the past 2 years
in the plan B free agent list, but Woodruff continues to make the team and play
well, he had 4 interceptions this year.
David Johnson also turned in a fine year, intercepting 4 passes, and will start
for the Steelers for years to come.
Special Teams:
Gary Anderson remains one of the best place kickers in the game and showed no
sign this season of letting up. He should have 3 or 4 more good years in him
at least.
Dan Stryzinski(sp??), while not posting a top ten avg punting yardage stat
did lead the league in the number of his punts that were either fair caught
or downed inside the 20. While not possessing a strong leg, he does kick punts
with good to excellent hang times.
Ah well, nexted season is only ~6 months away for the Steelers.
JaKe
|
35.2 | Dump Brister, sign Young (SF backup) and watch Pittsburgh fly.... | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Thu Jan 03 1991 18:58 | 19 |
|
I have bad feelings about Brister Jake. Some say he's the next coming of Terry
Bradshaw and only needs a few more years of experience to become a top flight
QB. Personally I think he's the next coming of Marc Wilson. He'll play well
enough to keep a starting job but will remain the weak link on an otherwise
powerful team.
I gotta think that if PittsburgH had a decent QB this year they'd be in the
playoffs. I can only think of a few teams that have a worse starting QB than
Brister. My short list is:
1) Chicago
2) San Diego
I'd even take rookies like Hodson (of NE), Rosenbaugh (pheonix 2nd year),
Gannon (minny 2nd string) over brister right now. I think the Steelers need
another QB before the rest of the team gets old waiting for Brister to mature.
Metz
|
35.3 | IMHO | 3D::BOYD | | Fri Jan 04 1991 08:34 | 16 |
|
I have to agree with Metz about Brister. The guy has potential, but he
isn't the QB to lead this team to the Super Bowl. His inconsistency
and inability to stay calm under pressure doesn't help this team at
all.
My hat goes off to Houston for coming up with the big win. Cody
Carlson looked pretty good for being a backup QB and the team really
rallied around him.
The Steelers need help on the DL and in the wide receiver spots. With
good draft picks and some wheeling and dealing the Steelers will be a
dominate team in the coming years...
JB
|
35.5 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 04 1991 11:13 | 41 |
| I agree with most of what everyone else has said.
The Steeler's need at least 1 more good wide receiver to be teamed up
with Lipp's. They still need a dominate defensive lineman who can get to
the quarterback. I also think they can improve their offensive line.
Brister, while looking great at times, has also looked like a dog. The
Steeler's should be trying to develope another QB who can replace him.
I've given up on Worley. He's lost his concentration and fumbled in too
many critical situations and he's injured all the time. He should be
traded. The rest of the team looks real solid with possibly the best
secondary in pro football.
For the last 10 years, the Steeler's have drafted people I've never
heard of. Woodson, Lipps, Green have all turned out to be winners. But
many of the other top picks have turned out to be disaster's. I certainly
don't know the college prospects as good as the scouts but there are
some player's I've seen this year that I'd love to see wearing Black and
Gold. (I am partial to the CU Buffs). Rocket Ismail has stated that he'd
love to play for the Steeler's. I doubt that there's anyway for the
Steeler's to pick him up but he could scare the *&^% out of of opposing
defenses if the Steeler's can find a way. Chris Zorich really impressed me
in the Orange Bowl. He could be the pass rusher the Steeler's need. I'd
love to see the Steeler's pick up Mike Pritchard. He's not rated as high
as many wide receiver's by the scouts so I think he may be available in
the 3rd or 4th round. For CU, he always made the big plays under pressure,
he runs with the ball very well, has good hands and good speed. Use
him as a wide recevier and/or 3rd down specialist. There are many fullbacks
who run better than George Hemingway but I don't think there are any better
at blocking. He's also a very good receiver, has good speed and doesn't
fumble(unlike Worley). He may still be available in the 7th or 8th round.
Gerald Hudson(running back,Okla State) could be a great acquisition if
he chooses to skip his senior year. Then there's the offensive line. I
thought Joe Garten would be a good pick but Zorich beat him pretty bad a
couple of times in the orange bowl. I think he dropped from a late first
round/early 2nd round to a 3rd or 4th round pick. Maybe the Steeler's could
develope him.
Oh well, I quess we'll just have to wait to see how the Steeler's surprise
us this year.
Keith
|
35.6 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Jan 04 1991 14:50 | 42 |
|
Well, the Steeler's mainly did it with mirrors this year. Here is
a team that had the No. 1 defense but yet they never beat a team over
.500. So, that doesn't say to much for being No. 1 defensively.
Granted that in some of the games in which they lost, the offense was
totally inept, but the fact still remains that the Steeler's managed to
beat only the worst in the NFL.
As for Brister, I've been his biggest critic and will remain so.
Bubby has completed 5 years in the NFL as a QB and still only shows
potential! I'm sick of po-tential. Brister reminds me more of Mark
Malone everyday, or should I say every game. He will never be more
than an average QB.
As for the offense in general, they are in pretty good shape
although I would get rid of Worley. The kid has some talent, but he
fumbles way to much and the biggest downer being a running back is to
be labeled a "fumbler". Hoge is solid as an average back and I would
like to see more of Williams and Foster next year. As for the
receivers, Lipps is still very solid and is capable if they would throw
him the ball! The real sleeper here might be this Calloway kid from
Michigan. The times I saw him play, he did a good job seeing that he
was a rookie.
As for the Defense, I'd draft the best lineman I could. The
Steeler's are only a lineman and a linebacker away from having an
excellent defense. Of course they could use a couple of linemen, but
they really need a good one right now. The pass rush is non-existant
with this current crop.
All in all this was a pretty disappointing season from where I sat.
The Steeler's ended up 9-7(again), but couldn't beat a .500 team.
With the division title at hand, they also couldn't rise to the top
which is something the team of the 70's had no problem with. The
defense is really the future here, and they could have a good offense
if they would get rid of Worley and Brister. But, knowing Noll,
Brister will be back next year and so the Steeler's will go 9-7 once
again.
bill..g.
|
35.7 | | 3D::BOYD | | Fri Jan 04 1991 15:20 | 13 |
|
I didn't realize that Brister has 5 years experience in the NFL. I
have to blame Noll for letting him hang on this long. I admire Noll
for his coaching abilities, but I feel he hangs onto the "only average"
players too long.
With a new QB and some dominate players in the defensively line I think
the Steelers have the makings of a dominate team for the next decade.
Noll just has to show that he is willing to make the moves to get the
team there...
JB
|
35.8 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | Ah Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted year | Fri Jan 04 1991 17:02 | 18 |
| Brister has been a member of the Steelers for 5 years but last year was
his first full year as a starter. He also only played one year of
college football. I think his biggest problem is that he gets too
excited and loses it. If he can overcome that problem, he can
conceivably lead them to bigger and better things.
I also don't think that he is the biggest reason for the offensive
flops this year. he threw for 21 TD's and 14 ints, ended up somewhere
around 5th in the AFC QB ratings.
I suffered thru Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone and in no way see Brister
as a Malone Clone. I personally would make next year a make or break
year for Brister if I were with the Steelers.
Worley:==Walter Abercrombie/Greg Hawthorne IMHO
JaKe
|
35.9 | also has Elway's abilty at reading defenses | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I could use a dramatic sting here | Sun Jan 06 1991 19:52 | 6 |
| Why couldn't the Oilers' team that supposedly showed up today have been on
the field last week?
I think Jake hit the Bubby problem right on the head TOO EMOTIONAL
mike
|
35.10 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | I'm a DEVILS' advocate!!! | Sun Jan 06 1991 22:03 | 3 |
| PittsburgH lost from the Walton_Effect(tm).
JoJ
|
35.11 | Year End Numbers | CELTIK::JACOB | What's a Junk Note???? | Tue Jan 08 1991 23:07 | 206 |
| 1990 Pittsburgh STEELERS Final Stats
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Opponents
FIRST DOWNS 263 257
Rushing 93 102
Passing 150 130
Penalty 20 25
3RD Downs made-ATT-pct 74-187-39.6% 81-205-39.5%
4TH Downs Made-Att-Pct 4-10-40% 6-17-35.3%
TOTAL NET YARDS 4525 4115
Avg per game 282.8 257.2
Total plays 897 940
Yds per play 5.0 4.4
NET YDS RUSHING 1880 1615
Avg/game 117.5 100.9
Total rushes 456 446
Yds/rush 4.12 3.62
NET YDS PASSING 2645 2500
Avg/game 165.3 156.3
Sacked/yds lost 33-242 34-228
Gross yards 2887 2728
Att-comp 408-237 460-236
Compl pct 58.1 51.3
Had intercepted 15 24
PUNTING AVERAGE 66-37.2 64-40.9
NET PUNTING AVERAGE 34.1 33.7
PENALTIES-YARDS 110-928 89-719
FUMBLES-LOST 40-17 33-18
TOUCHDOWNS 33 26
Rushing 11 13
Passing 20 9
Returns 2 4
SCORING BY QUARTER:
1 2 3 4 Total
STEELERS 64 71 54 103 292
Opponents 58 86 56 40 240
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING
Player No Rushes Yds Avg Long Td
Hoge 203 772 3.8 41+ 7
Worley 109 418 3.8 38 0
W.Williams 68 389 5.7 70+ 3
Foster 36 203 5.6 38 1
Brister 25 64 2.6 11 0
Bell 5 18 3.6 12 0
Stryzinski 3 17 5.7 9 0
Strom 4 10 2.5 10 0
Lipps 1 -5 -5.0 -5 0
Stone 2 -6 -3.0 10 0
PASSING
Att Compl Yds Pct TD Int Long
Brister 387 223 2725 57.6 20 14 90
Strom 21 14 162 66.7 0 1 22
RECEIVING
No. Yds Avg Long Td
Lipps 50 682 13.6 37 3
Hoge 40 342 8.6 27 3
EricGreen 34 387 11.4 46 7
Mularkey 32 365 11.4 28 3
Hill 25 391 15.6 66 0
Stone 19 332 17.5 90 1
Bell 12 137 11.4 43 1
Calloway 10 124 12.4 20+ 1
Worley 8 70 8.8 27 0
W.Williams 5 42 8.4 13 1
O'Shea 1 13 13.0 13 0
Foster 1 2 2 2 0
Field Goals 1-19 20-29 30-39 40-49-50+ Total
Anderson 1-1 3-3 8-8 8-11 0-2 20-25
SCORING TdRun TdPass Ret PaT FG Safety Tot Pts
Anderson - - - 32-32 20-25 - 92
Hoge 7 3 - - - - 60
EricGreen 0 7 - - - - 42
W.Williams 3 1 - - - - 24
Lipps 0 3 - - - - 18
Mularkey 0 3 - - - - 18
Bell 0 1 - - - - 6
Calloway 0 1 - - - - 6
Foster 1 0 - - - - 6
Johnson - - 1 - - - 6
Stone 0 1 - - - - 6
Woodson - - 1 - - - 6
Stowe - - - - - 1 2
PUNTING No Yds Avg TchBck In 20 Long Blocked
Stryzinski 65 2454 37.8 5 18 51 1
Team 66 2454 37.2 5 18 51 1
PUNT RETURNS No FairCaught Yds Avg Long TD
Woodson 38 8 398 10.5 52+ 1
Hill 1 0 0 0 0 0
KICKOFF RETURNS No Yds Avg Long TD Botched all to hell
Woodson 35 764 21.8 49 0
Stone 5 91 18.2 24 0
J.Williams 3 31 10.3 20 0
Foster 3 29 9.7 13 0 1
Griffin 2 16 8.0 14 0
E.Green 1 16 16.0 16 0
Lipps 1 9 9.0 9 0
Olsavsky 1 0 0.0 0 0
INTERCEPTIONS No Yds Avg Long TD
Woodson 5 67 13.4 34 0
Griffin 4 75 18.8 36 0
Woodruff 3 110 36.7 59 0
Everett 3 2 0.7 2 0
Johnson 2 60 30.0 34 1
Little 1 35 35.0 35 0
Lloyd 1 9 9.0 9 0
Willis 1 5 5.0 5 0
A.Jones 1 3 3.0 3 0
Hall 1 0 0.0 0 0
Lake 1 0 0.0 0 0
DEFENSE Tackles-Assists
Little 63-17
Johnson 59-10
Nickerson 58-9
Lake 57-10
Woodson 54-12
Hinkle 56-7
Lloyd 55-7
G.Williams 45-4
Everett 28-7
Willis 20-9
Evans 21-5
Griffin 22-3
Woodruff 17-5
Davidson 19-1
J.Williams 13-2
Freeman 11-3
A.Jones 7-3
G.Jones 9-0
Veasey 5-4
Hall 6-0
Olsavsky 6-0
Shelton 4-0
Jenkins 3-0
Stowe 1-0
QB SACKS No Yds
G.Williams 6 -47
Willis 5 -25
Lloyd 4.5 -46
Davidson 3.5 -23
Evans 3 -26
Freeman 2 -14
Jenkins 2 -13
Hinkle 2 -11
Nickerson 2 -8
A.Jones 2 -4
J.Williams 1 -6
Lake 1 -5
PASSES DEFENDED
Johnson 18, Woodson 16, Lake 11, Griffin 7, Hinkle 6, Woodruff 6, Everett 5,
Evans 4, Hall 4, Little 4, Nickerson 3, Lloyd 2, G.Williams 2, J.Williams 2,
A.Jones 1, Willis 1.
OPPONENTS FUMBLES RECOVERED
Evans 3, Hinkle 2, Little 2, J.Williams 2, Freeman 1, Johnson 1, A.Jones 1,
Lake 1, Stone 1, Stowe 1, Veasy 1, Willis 1, Woodruff 1.
FORCED FUMBLES
Little 4, Everett 2, Hinkle 2, A.Jones 2, Lake 2, Nickerson 2, Olsavsky 2,
Freeman 1,Griffin 1, Hall 1, Johnson 1, G.Jones 1, Lloyd 1, Stowe 1, G.Williams
1, J.Williams 1, Woodson 1.
FUMBLES No. Lost
Brister 9 3
Hoge 6 3
Worley 6 3
Williams 5 5
Foster 2 1
Griffin 1 1
Lipps 1 1
Blankenship 1 0
E.Green 1 0
Hill 1 0
Mularkey 1 0
Stone 1 0
Strom 1 0
J.Williams 1 0
Woodson 1 0
There's always next year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.12 | IMHO | 3D::BOYD | | Wed Jan 09 1991 10:29 | 15 |
| After looking at the numbers, esspecially the comparison of the
Steelers vs Opponents, I would have to say that they look better on
paper than what they actually are..
Three things that stick out in my mind.. Fumbles, Penalties and Sacks
against opponents. The fumbles/turnovers they could fix by teaching
Worley how to hang on to the ball. Penalties well there isn't much
they can do about that... That is in the hands of the refs... Sacks
you have to attribute to the lack of a pass rush.. The Steelers need
to go to a 4 down 3 up defensive line scheme to help put some more
pressure on opposing qb's.
IMHO
JB
|
35.13 | Got some good laughs out of this | CELTIK::JACOB | Oh Whoa, the spoils of oil | Mon Jan 14 1991 21:32 | 117 |
| CAN YOU SEE THE ROCKET IN BLACK AND GOLD
BY
Gene Collier
Reprinted from the Pittsburgh Press, January 13, 1991 edition, with permission.
It looks as if it;s getting down to decision time for Rocket Ismail, so
let's look closely at the young man's options and try to think along with him.
Don't worry, it's not exactly the mental equivalent of heavy lifting.
Does Rocket:
A). Forego his final year of eligibility at Notre Dame, sign a 5-year
contract with a National Football League team calling for $10 million to $1$12
million, including an approximate $3 million signing bonus, accept a shoe
contract and accompanying market blitz for a reported $6 million that will make
him the Air Jordan of football and live wealthily ever after, OR:
B). return to college football, where they'll let you take two calculus
courses at once if you're really looking for a good time.
Hmmmmmmmm. Careful now!!!
Heres some information on Option B. Should the Rocket return to
college ball and, after being declared a mental patient, get hurt, he would
jeopardize something like $20 million.
Hmmmmmmm.
OK, Time's up.
Yes, Rocket should choose "A" because his choice is between a once in a
lifetime oppurtunity (actually a once in several hundred million lifetimes
oppurtunity) and Notre Dame, which has been there since the discovery of fire
and shows no apparent instability.
As it happens, conventional wisdom holds that the Rocket will
choose--are you ready---"A".
"Absolutely," said Ralph Cindrich, the local agent, "He's one of those
unique, exceptional talents, someone who has really distinguished himself. He
has an aura that appeals to marketing companies and he's a great fan of the
Steelers."
WHOA!
The Rocket grew up in Wilkes-Barre dreaming of running the
sophisticated trap offense of the Black and Gold??????????
Absolutely verifiable.
George Stewart, the Steelers special-team coach who held the same position at
Notre Dame will tell you.
Sang the words to the Steeler polka as a todler????
Let's not get ridiculuos.
But let's look for a minute at option "C".
C). Rocket returns to Notre Dame for another year, hoping the Steelers will
play badly enough to earn the No. 1 choice in the 1992 draft.
Uh, No.
Time to give somebody else some options, like the people in the think
tank at 300 Stadium Circle, like Chuck Noll himself.
Let's think along with Chuck. Seatbelts fastened????
Does Chuck:
A). Content himself with the 15th choice in the draft, which will probably
net someone lit bit-of-a-reach wideout Raheem Scissorhands of Piedmont Bible
College, or:
B). Trade the New England Patriots Louis Lipps, Tim Worley, Tichard Bell,
Greg Lloyd and the No. 1 draft choice in 1992 for the right to choose the
Rocket, who is only the most electrifying player in captivity.
Look, Dan Rooney always said he's in the entertainment business. Who's
more entertaining in a football uniform than Ismail? Besides Dwight Stone, of
course.
The residual impact of the Rocket might justify the cost.
He'll put your team back in the national consciousness and your take from
NFL Properties will go through the sky. I mean what's the worst thing that can
happen, you won't make the playoffs.
Think of the focus it would bring Pittsburgh in the meantime. You'd have
the Rocket, the sport's most compelling figure, all over the tube on draft day
saying, "Gee, it's a dream come true; there's no place I'd rather be than
Pittsburgh."
HE MIGHT EVEN COME TO MINICAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't know, but for me, it would be a lot more interesting standing in
the Latrobe heat listening to Noll shrug off the absence of the Rocket than of,
say, Eric Green.
I'd like to get the chance to hear Noll say, "Raghib who? Look, I can
only concern myself with the people who are here."
"He's missed too much already. He can't help us."
Then, in a late night August session between Rooney and turbo-powered
agent Marvin Skimoff, Rocket would agree to another record Steelers contract
when Rooney agrees to include in the deal several small aircraft.
Finally, Rocket's dream date arrives.
He trots out to receive the kickoff that will open the 1991 season and
launch the NFL into a new era.
The Cleveland Browns, on whom the moment like many other things is lost,
squib the kick to Brian Blankenship, who falls on it at the 40.
Rocket joins the huddle. He splits wide right. But the first two plays
are runs gaining 2 yards and 2 yards.
Now it's 3rd and 6, Three Rivers Stadium at a broil.
And it happens:
The Joe Walton offense dictates that Rocket and Eric Green be replaced by
Chris Calloway and Raheem Scissorhands, who was, incredibly, still available in
the 5th round.
You know what?????
Just forget the whole thing!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.14 | Gene Collier calls it again | SHALOT::MEDVID | President Gas | Tue Jan 15 1991 09:25 | 3 |
| How funny...how true...how sad.
--dan'l
|
35.15 | Steelers great teams | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:30 | 14 |
| I always admired the Steelers of the 70's. Truly a great team.When
you think of dynasties, up here in Mass,the Steelers always seemed
to get overlooked. The Niners come up,Dolphins,Packers, and the
Steelers are mentioned as a great team,but always as an afterthought,
IMO. However,give me the 70's Steelers anyday; I'd stack up Bradshaw
in the clutch vs any QB( Including Montana,and I'm an ND guy)
As far as the Immaculate Reception sending the Steelers on their way,
I recall that that only gave them a win over the Raiders. Weren't they
pummelled in the championship game vs. Miami that year? I think the
next year (74-75) they won the Super Bowl.
MikeL
|
35.16 | very articulate | PNO::HEISER | Armageddon Appetite | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:43 | 5 |
| Last night's Sportsline has Rocky Bleir(sp?) as a guest. It was
interesting to hear him draw parallels with today's events and how it
affects an athlete in the military.
Mike
|
35.17 | Pittsburgh Dynasty 1972-1979 | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:10 | 28 |
| 1972 Win the Immaculate Reception game 13-7, lose AFC title game
to Miami 21-17 after posting 11-3 regular season record.
Miami goes on to win Super Bowl
1973 Finish with 10-4 record, end up as wild card, loses playoff
game to Oakland 33-14. Miami beats Oakland the next week
27-10 and goes on to win Super Bowl
1974 10-3-1 regular season record. Beats Buffalo 32-14, Oakland
24-13 and Minnesota 16-6 in New Orleans to win Super Bowl 9
1975 12-2 regular season record. Beats Baltimore 28-10 and
Oakland 16-10 before beating Dallas 21-17 in Miami
1976 10-4 regular season record. Beats Baltimore 40-14 before
losing to Oakland 24-7. Oakland wins Super Bowl
1977 9-5 regular season record. Loses to Denver 34-21. Denver
beats Oakland before losing to Dallas in Super Bowl
1978 14-2 regular season record. Beats Denver 33-10, Houston
34-5 and Dallas 35-31 to win Super Bowl XIII in Miami
1979 12-4 regular season record. Beats Miami 34-14, Houston
27-13 and Los Angeles 31-19 to win Super Bowl XIV in
Pasadena.
John
|
35.18 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zamfir's Heavy Metal Classics | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:43 | 4 |
| In 1976 both Franco Harris and Rocky Blier were out of the AFC
Championship game with injuries.
/Don
|
35.19 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Jan 15 1991 13:19 | 11 |
|
re: '76 Steelers
Not to mention that both Harris and Blier gained over 1000 yards
that year.
Many believe that the '76 team was the best of em all. The defense
recorded the lowest points against total for a 14 game season at that
point with I believe 4 shutouts.
|
35.20 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | After further review .... | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:08 | 6 |
| re .18
Uh oh ...
So I guess that the '76 Championship games loss was a post facto
Excellent Loss, right Slasher ?
|
35.21 | JMO | EARRTH::BROOKS | After further review .... | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:10 | 7 |
| Goose, the 76 team was supposed to best of them all, but Bradshaw
couldn't pick up the slack for the losses of Harris and Bleir right ?
Maybe the D was at their most dominant (possibly the best ever to play
the game), but I like the 79-80 Steelers better as an offensive force.
That version of Bradshaw might have been able to beat the Raiders a few
years earlier.
|
35.22 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:45 | 16 |
|
re: Doc
Bradshaw was hurt for part of the year and that is why Harris and
Blier had 1000 yard years. I'm not sure when he returned, but the
Steeler's had a great first round game and blew away the Colts only to
find that they had lost their backfield. Having then to play the
Raiders out there without a backfield of any kind, kinda put the
Steeler's on the ropes. Don't forget that the Raiders and the Steelers
at this time were probably the best two teams in football. The
raiders to advantage of the lack of a running game and won the game
handily. Had the Steeler's went in full strength, it would of been
a better game.
bill..g.
|
35.23 | Defense - Defense - Defense | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:49 | 5 |
| I agree that the 76 team was the best. The way I remember it, they got off
to a lousy start. Then Bradshaw got injured and had to sit out the next
6 games. During those 6 games, the Steeler's had 4 shutouts.
Keith
|
35.24 | Standing O for Ben Dreith | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:52 | 15 |
| Don't forget that Pats had a helluva year in '76 also. Methinks
they woulda been Supa Bowl Champs if they hadn't been Ben Dreith'ed
in Oakland.
Waddya say John H.?
(GD ruffing the passer against Sugar Bear, !?!!ing Villapiano holding
Francis!! ARRRRGH)
Deep breath, ok, flashback over!
Opening Old Wounds
MikeL
|
35.25 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zamfir's Heavy Metal Classics | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:52 | 5 |
| Doc, it was almost as excellent as the Lakers 1984 loss to the
Celtics, or the Lakers 1989 loss to the Pistons, or the Lakers 1990
loss to the Suns.
/DoEL
|
35.26 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:10 | 5 |
| Could have been, but I refuse to use an official's call as an excuse.
What happened happened, and officiating is as much a part of the game
as injuries are.
John
|
35.27 | Where's Larry Barnett? | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:17 | 10 |
| John,
Did I read somewhere that Dreith was demoted from Umpire this
year?
IMO it was 14 years too late.
No excuses, still recall the anger. O well
MikeL
|
35.28 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:26 | 6 |
| Dodo - EL , I never claimed EL's for the Lakers ... of course this is
merely a method of smokescenning that the LB Jihad loves to practice,
so that you can claim EL's against the Pistons in 88, and the Knicks
last year.
Not to mention for the next two weeks at least - HAHAHAHHAAAA !!!!
|
35.29 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:52 | 16 |
| Both Ben Dreith and Fred Wyant were moved from Referee to Line Judge
this year. The NFL cut back from 16 officiating crews to 15. Tom
White, in his second year in the NFL (the only other person I know of
who made to Referee that quickly is Jerry Markbreit) was moved from
Line Judge to Referee. That was planned before the season. Because of
the illness (and death, in early October) of last year's Super Bowl
Referee, Dick Jorgensen, Gerry Austin was moved from Side Judge to
Referee. Jim Tunney and Ben Dreith are in their 31st year of
officiating in the NFL.
Jerry Seeman will be moving from the field to the office as he takes
over for the retiring Art McNally as Supervisor of Officials on April
1, so there will likely be a lot of movement next year and a lot of
older officials are likely to retire.
John
|
35.30 | Steelers were under the microscope | SHALOT::MEDVID | President Gas | Wed Jan 16 1991 10:41 | 22 |
| I hate to clobber a lifeless equine, but I got to thinking about what
Bob Hunt said concerning the 70's Steelers benefiting from officials'
calls. It has always been my opinion that just the opposite is true.
Lambert was a hard hitter. I hesitate to say "dirty player" because
that title goes to Mike Wagner. Anyway, anytime Lambert was remotely
close to a late hit (i.e. it really wasn't a late hit or roughing) he
got flagged. And that carried over to the rest of the defense. The
officials were always watching the Steelers intimidating defense a
little closer than usual.
And I distinctly remember a long Franco Harris run being called back
for...are you ready for this..."hurdling." I don't know if any other
runner in the history of football has been called for "hurdling." It
was the first and last time I ever heard it called.
There were rumors back then that Rozelle didn't want the Steelers to
win anymore super bowls because he was hungry for parity. He wanted
someone else to win. That can never be proved, but if it was so, the
Steelers overcame that too.
--dan'l
|
35.31 | Steelers got their share of breaks | SHALOT::HUNT | Bippity Boppity Boo | Wed Jan 16 1991 11:06 | 33 |
| Harold Carmichael, the Eagles' 6'-8" wide receiver, used to get flags
for "hurdling" all the time. Thankfully, the NFL finally ditched that
rule and now we see it all the time.
As for the Steelers and the referees and all that ... I simply took a
shot at JaKe for daring to complain that the Niners get the benefit of
the doubt. All dynasties, Steelers and Niners included, get a fair
share of breaks and good luck and "Dame Fortune" along the way.
Otherwise [drum roll please ...], they wouldn't have been dynasties.
Tres simple, n'est-ce pas ???
I can remember two calls in the 1970s that went the Steelers' way.
One, of course, is the one we already mentioned. The "Immaculate
Reception" should have been ruled incomplete because the ball hit two
offensive players in a row. At *that* time, that was an incompleted
pass. It's now okay.
The second occured during one of the two late-70s AFC Conference
Championship wins over over Bum Phillip's Houston Oilers. Houston's
Mike Barber caught a Dan Pastorini pass in the extreme backend corner
of the Steelers' endzone and got his tippy-toes inside the line but the
refs blew it out of bounds. Endless replays showed him with his feet
just barely in bounds but to no avail since instant replay wasn't in
force then. The Steelers took the gift and blew the Oilers away from
there.
I'm not saying that the Steelers wouldn't have won four Supes without
the refs' help. They were a true dynasty in every sense of the word.
But don't fool yourselves into thinking that they didn't get some
breaks in some very fortunate situations.
Bob Hunt
|
35.32 | Who knows? | SHALOT::MEDVID | President Gas | Wed Jan 16 1991 11:22 | 25 |
| Granted I look at things through black-and-gold-colored glasses, but I
always try to be rational and objective.
I have both plays Bob points to on video. To me, both are
inconclusive. I watch the immaculate reception and I can't tell if the
ball hit Frenchy or not. You mean you can, Bob? Then you've got a
camera angle that even the NFL doesn't have because no one is really
sure...not even those involved in the play.
As for Barber, that was a split second call and I really don't think he
had downright possession of the ball before he got those tippy-toes in.
That was also the refs ruling. He didn't have possession. It wasn't
that his feet weren't in. And I think even instant replay wouldn't
overturn the call...that's my opinion from what I've seen them call
"inconclusive" and "conclusive".
Back to the original point, I think both plays are inconclusive so it's
just up to what we, as individuals see and think.
There's obviously fodder here for two huge ratholes, so let's not get
into it. Those who think one way will see those plays that way and
those who think the other will see it THAT way. Nothing we can do
about it. It's over and the Steelers were champs.
--dan'l
|
35.33 | No rathole here | KUDZU::HUNT | Bippity Boppity Boo | Wed Jan 16 1991 12:07 | 21 |
| � Back to the original point, I think both plays are inconclusive so it's
� just up to what we, as individuals see and think.
I agree completely. Both plays were 100% inconclusive and no amount or
sophistication of instant replays would have been able to tell anyone
otherwise.
� It's over and the Steelers were champs.
And this is my ultimate point, too. Both plays in question were ruled
on the field in the Steelers' favor. That they were called so isn't
right and it isn't wrong. It just *is*.
Great teams get these calls or else they wouldn't be great teams. The
Steelers were a great team. No doubt about it. But all the talent in
the world doesn't bring home that much bacon without a little divine
intervention every now and then.
Which is what JaKe was complaining about with the current 49ers.
Bob Hunt
|
35.34 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zamfir's Heavy Metal Classics | Wed Jan 16 1991 13:07 | 9 |
| You can argue about the Immaculate Reception, but in the 1979
AFC final against the Oilers, Barber *did* score a touchdown. Had
there been an instant replay then it would've counted. The score
at the time was 21-14 and the TD would've tied up the game. The
Oilers kicked a field goal then the Steelers scored again making
a 28-17 final (hardly blown out). Can't say the Oilers would've
won the game, but that was a touchdown.
/Don
|
35.35 | Renfro was robbed | HPSRAD::SANTOS | monster is unleashed for a test run | Wed Jan 16 1991 13:30 | 8 |
| /Don,
I think the play your talking about was with Mike Renfro catching
the ball in the corner of the endzone while he was falling.
Then again, maybe I don't know what I'm talking.
Chuck
|
35.36 | Damn, the memory is fading | KUDZU::HUNT | Bippity Boppity Boo | Wed Jan 16 1991 13:38 | 6 |
| Now that you mention it, I think it was Mike Renfro and not Mike
Barber.
The play I remember, the name, well ...
Bob Hunt
|
35.37 | Steelers weren't alone | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Wed Jan 16 1991 14:13 | 11 |
| re .30
If Franco was called for anything, it shoulda been for tip-toeing out
of bounds like the girly mon he was .... :-)
Actually I felt that the old Raiders teams got the same type of
mistreatment from refs. Jack Tatum seldom went outside of the rules to
knock you dizzy, but he would get flagged on his 'rep' more than
anything else. Ditto for Skip Thomas and Sistrunk. Aktison was probably
the only real villian in the bunch (but was still a great CB), and the
rest of the Raiders suffered for him and Ben Davidson ....
|
35.38 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Wed Jan 16 1991 14:19 | 8 |
| re .31
Thanks Bob for mentioning the 78 title game. I have a bias true, but
the refs copped out big time in Three Rivers, just like they did on the
I.R. in '72 ...when did a close call ever go against them at home ?
And I noticed that Mr Clean, Chuck Noll - never mentioned the
Wagner cheapshot that knocked Mike Barber out of that game....
|
35.39 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Wed Jan 16 1991 14:22 | 6 |
| re .35
Chuck is right, it was Mike Renfro - Barber had been knocked out of the
game earlier. The TD-that-wasn't wouldhave made it a 17-17 game.
Instead the Oilers kicked a FG to make it 17-13, and the Steelers won
27-13.
|
35.40 | I bleed black and white! | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jan 16 1991 15:57 | 59 |
|
Here I go again defending those darn awful men in stripes...I guess
I just bleed black and white stripes now.
Everyone has an opinion of what happened with the I.R. Frankly, to
this day, no one really knows except Tatum and Fuqua. Tatum says he
never touched the ball, but does anyone really believe anything Tatum
says? Boy, Jack sure did a great Houdini after the "accident". So,
the only really reliable source is Fuqua. A few years ago on the
anniversary of the I.R. he was supposed to come out and tell his side.
I never did hear if he did this or not.
But seeing how everyone has an opinion on these couple of plays,
I'll just enter mine from a ref's perspective.
In the case of the I.R. the ref's had to of been spread pretty
thin all over the field. The Steeler's were down to their last play
and they had to throw some sort of bomb. Adding to the fact that some
of the refs were positioned for the heave, Bradshaw also had to
scramble out of the pocket thus occupying some more eyes. When the
ball and the two players came in contact, the refs were simply out of
position to see what happened. Now, in hoops, if you don't see it,
you can't call it. It's as simple as that. No one really knew what
happened except that Franco caught a deflected pass and ran it in for
a score. They called a conference and no one really knew what
happened. Believe me, I've been in a couple of those conferences and
they are not a lot of fun. If no one saw what happened, then you go
with the play. Given the confusion of a last ditch play, it's easy
for me to see why the ref's were out of position to see the play
properly.
As for the Houston non-TD, I believe it was a TD. Another split
second judgment thing for the ref. Again, if he felt that Renfro
didn't quite have possession, then no TD. If he did, then it should
of been a TD. Remember, that official had to look at Renfro's feet
and his hands at the same time to see if he had possession and both
feet inbounds. If I remember correctly, Renfro's catch was slightly
over the shoulder which would of made it a hard catch to see by the
other officials. To be honest to the ref's, if the play is viewed
at normal speed, it's really hard to tell. Only after they broke the
play down frame by frame (including pictures in SI which I own)
could you really tell what happened.
As far as I'm concerned, the Steeler's got some breaks through the
years and they had some go against them. But the fact remains, that
the good teams make the breaks and do the most given the breaks.
Given these plays, which are really a couple of the toughest to
call, the refs I believe did the right thing based upon their judgment.
If instant reply was around, the Oilers would of been given a TD
in that case, but given the camera angles involving the I.R., I don't
see how they could of overruled the TD. After 18 years, we still don't
know what really happened! Maybe we could resurrect the Warren
Commission to review the evidence...where's Zapruder when you need him?
bill..g.
|
35.41 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Just this beer, then one more... | Wed Jan 16 1991 16:02 | 5 |
| To bad HOOT ain't here. He knows exactly what happened on the
Immaculate Reception. The receiver was Renfro, but I still thought
the score was 28-17.
/Don
|
35.42 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Three roses on piano, Tulips on Organ | Thu Jan 31 1991 15:44 | 15 |
| Dwayne Woodruff, DB, has stated that he absolutely WILL NOT play for
the Steelers next year. Woodruff is the last Steeler with a Super Bowl
ring from the Steelers 4th triumph.
He stated that the reason he won't return to the Steelers is the fact
that they haven't treated him well(his opinion) the last three years.
He is reported to have contacted 3 NFL teams about the possibility of
playing one or two more years.
The Steelers have said that Woodruff will not be on the protected list
for teh third straight year.
JaKe
|
35.43 | Later Dwayne | SHALOT::MEDVID | When two tribes go to war... | Thu Jan 31 1991 16:20 | 1 |
|
|
35.44 | Mularkey | CELTIK::JACOB | Teenage Moody Nugent Turtles | Thu Jan 31 1991 19:14 | 7 |
| Mike Mularkey will not be protected this year. Mularkey underwent
arthroscopic surgery on both of his knees and it is unknown whether he
will play football again. Mularkey has given his word to the Steelers
that if he is able to play, he WILL play for the Steelers.
JaKe
|
35.45 | STEELERS plan B | CELTIK::JACOB | Teenage Moody Nugent Turtles | Tue Feb 05 1991 18:24 | 20 |
| Richard Bell, rb;
Brian Blankenship, ol;
Gene Cullinane, c;
Larry Griffin, db;
Derek Hill, wr;
Bryan Hinkle, lb;
A.J. Jenkins, lb-de;
Terry Long, og;
Mike Mularkey, te;
Terry O'Shea, te;
John Rienstra, og;
Tyronne Stowe, lb;
Rick Strom, qb;
Keith Willis, de;
Dwayne Woodruff, cb.
JaKe
|
35.46 | Woodson signing? | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Fri Mar 22 1991 09:56 | 9 |
| Can anyone fill me in on some happenings with Rod Woodson? My dad
called me the other night from Florida and had just caught the final
words of a sports story involving the Steelers and Woodson. Something
about the Steelers didn't want to lose him so they signed him.
My guess is that it was Woodruff and not Woodson and that the old man's
hearing aint what it used to be.
--dan'l
|
35.47 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | It's a real beauty, A Mexican Cutie | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:24 | 19 |
| Dan'l:
I haven't heard anything about it lately so I'll make a couple of
contacts tonite and see what I can drum up, but here's the poop so far
Rod Woodson has had a few meetings with the Atlanta Falcons. He is, as
of now, a restricted free agent, meaning he can sign with any team but
the Steelers get a chance to match the other teams offer. Also, if he
is signed by another team, it will cost them 2 first round draft picks
for taking him.
Woodruff was pi$$ed about the Steelers leaving him on plan B and not
making him megabuck offers to stay and play with the Steelers. He
reportedly has said he WILL NOT play for the Steelers next season.
More when I get more info.
JaKe
|
35.48 | No Wood*.* signings yet, Dan'l | ECAMV3::JACOB | How It Got Here, I haven't a Clue | Tue Mar 26 1991 15:56 | 9 |
| Woodson still hasn't signed with anybody. The Atlanta Falcons are
still wining, dining, and sixty-nin....oops, talking to him.
Woodruff, to ny knowledge, has not signed with anybody either. The
Steelers can't talk to him until after April 1st, I think being that
he's a plan "b" free agent.
JaKe
|
35.49 | Thanks, JaKe. Good to have connections! | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:00 | 1 |
|
|
35.50 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | How It Got Here, I haven't a Clue | Mon Apr 01 1991 20:51 | 19 |
| Woodson hyas until midnight tonite to sign with another club or the
Steelers have to negotiate a contract with him, instead of matching
somebody else's offer.
The Steelers, unless anything happens tonite, lost 4 players in the
Plan "B" extravaganza. They lost Tyrone Stowe and Derek Hill to the
Cardinals. The fact that they are so weak at WR made me wonder why
they left Hill unprotected. Lipps isn't getting any younger and Hill,
while a dissapointment so far, has only been in the league for 2 years.
They also lost John Reinstra to the Brown(spot)s(tm). Rhino is a 5
year former #1 draft pick who has been a HUGE dissapointment(no pun
intended).
They also lost Richard Bell, RB, but I can't remember who picked him
up.
JaKe
|
35.51 | Greene, Woodson, and Moore...Steelers No. 1 picks | SHALOT::MEDVID | No I was not pushing that time | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:55 | 17 |
| Dan Rooney gave massive tight end Eric Greene an extra few thousand
dollars bonus out of the blue several weeks ago. Greene, who held out
for about half the season, was a key factor in the Steelers 1990
turnaround and he was rewarded for it.
Any word on Woodson yet? I'm sure that rumor over in the Pats topic is
just that. Probably some stupid commentator who saw that Pittsburgh
was having trouble signing him and decided it would be good for the
Pats to go after him.
Saw a mock draft in the paper where the Steelers would end up getting
Herman Moore. Personally, I think Moore is the most talented of all
the receivers in the draft (including Ismail) and I would jump for joy
if he were in black and gold. However, I think he'll go several picks
higher than the Steeler's 15th...but who knows!!!
--dan'l
|
35.52 | Seems like a decent draft for receivers... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Apr 12 1991 14:29 | 20 |
|
> Saw a mock draft in the paper where the Steelers would end up getting
> Herman Moore. Personally, I think Moore is the most talented of all
> the receivers in the draft (including Ismail) and I would jump for joy
> if he were in black and gold. However, I think he'll go several picks
> higher than the Steeler's 15th...but who knows!!!
Talented, but maybe a tad slow. Anyone hear his 40 time in any of
these NFL combines? Moore seemed to me to be the prototypical tall,
good-hands possession receiver instead of the game-breaker type.
First-round material, but I don't know if he'll go real high.
What's the guy's name who comes from a small school in (I think)
Texas? He was supposedly rated just above Ismail as the best prospect
in the country by one scouting system. The best performance I saw by a
receiver all year was by that Perkins kid from Tennessee against Notre
Dame, too, but I think he was only a sophomore or freshman...
glenn
|
35.53 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Apr 12 1991 16:03 | 13 |
| > -< Seems like a decent draft for receivers... >-
More like an excellent draft for receivers. I saw one report where
something like 7 of the 34 top rated players are receivers.
> What's the guy's name who comes from a small school in (I think)
Texas?
You're probably thinking of Reggie Barrett, WR, from UTEP, or Jake
Reed, WR, from Grambling (Isn't Grambling in Texas?).
Joe
|
35.54 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | New World Order = Business As Usual | Fri Apr 12 1991 16:23 | 1 |
| Grambling is in Louisiana, NE of New Orleans ...
|
35.55 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Fri Apr 12 1991 16:33 | 4 |
| How many of those `talented' receivers do you think will be attempted
to turn into Cornerbacks?
Mike JN
|
35.56 | Steelers' Choices | SHALOT::MEDVID | No I was not pushing that time | Mon Apr 22 1991 10:16 | 17 |
| Jake, got the write up from the Post-Gazette or Press about the
Steelers' choices?
1. Huey Richardson, lb, Florida
2. Jeff Graham, wr, Ohio State
3. Ernie Mills, wr, Florida
4. Adrian Cooper, te, Oklahoma
Not bad if the two receivers are OK. Dallas wanted Richardson and were
trading down in the draft thinking he was theirs. No one thought
Pittsburgh would take him.
I think it was a good pick if he's any kind of a pass rusher. That was
the weakest part of the team...not wide receiver like everyone and
their mother was indicating.
--dan'l
|
35.57 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Is a Solar Panel Lacquer-able?? | Mon Apr 22 1991 10:36 | 8 |
| Sorry Dan'l,
I'm up in Bedford Mass. for the next week, so no access to the PG or
the Press. I missed hearing Myron Cope's ranting and ravings on draft
day.
JaKe
|
35.58 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Apr 22 1991 13:35 | 9 |
|
Yea, I'd like to hear what the _Press_ has to say.
Gee, I wonder if we can expect him to play before the season
opener, or will he be another in the long line that doesn't show up
until mid-season?
bill..g.
|
35.59 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Is a Solar Panel Lacquer-able?? | Mon Apr 22 1991 13:49 | 16 |
| He'll hold out, Noll will say that he can be of no use to the Steelers
this season, he'll sign after 6 games then play from the 8th game on
and get 14 sacks. That's the way it goes every other year.
The Steelers always seem to have problems signing their #1 and it
always seems that when the guy does sign, it's for what he was asking
for originally, anyway. The Steelers have the second lowest payroll in
the leagueand seem to want to keep it that way.
Also, I look for them to have problems getting Woodson signed before
training camp this year. We should hear Noll say, "Rod Who????"
Then he'll sign after 3 or 4 games only to break his leg and sit the
season out, or something like that.
JaKe
|
35.60 | 1991 draft | CELTIK::JACOB | Is a Solar Panel Lacquer-able?? | Tue Apr 23 1991 09:22 | 18 |
| Steelers Picks
1 Huey Richardson DE Florida
2 Jeff Graham WR Ohio State
3 Ernie Mills WR Florida
4 Sammy Walker DB Texas Tech
4aAdrian Cooper TE Oklahoma
6 leroy Thompson RB Penn State
7 Andre Jones LB Notre Dame
8 Dean Dingman OG Michigan
9 Bruce McGonigal TE Virginia
10 Ariel Solomon OT Colorado
11 Efrum Thomas DB Alabama
12 Jeff Brady LB Kentucky
JaKe
|
35.61 | Looking better all the time... | SHALOT::MEDVID | so much more than everything | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:35 | 22 |
| The Steelers surprised everyone by not taking a quality wide receiver
in the first round...and stealing the player Dallas was eying on top
of that. But then they go ahead and draft the following:
2 Jeff Graham WR Ohio State
3 Ernie Mills WR Florida
4aAdrian Cooper TE Oklahoma
9 Bruce McGonigal TE Virginia
The more I think about it, that's not too bad. Walton experimented
with a two tight end formation last preseason. Everyone is complaining
that not taking a wide receiver with the first pick will mean another
year of Louis Lipps being double teamed. But think about it. If
either of those tight ends are any good and the Steelers do go with a
two tight end set, a defense would have to cover two receivers (one
being Lipps) and two tight ends (one being monster Eric Green). I
wouldn't want to be an opposing linebacker facing that.
Then again, none of that matters if Brister spends more time
complaining than learning.
--dan'l
|
35.62 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Whore + Pygmy=Little F#$ker | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:45 | 17 |
| re.61
Dan'l
Let us not forget that Green played quite a few plays lined up as a
slot receiver, too, and played damned good there. At TE, Mularkey is a
question mark, coming off reconstruction of his knee(s). Taking 2 TE's
in the draft should yeild at least one new one to the team, but with
the Steelers luck with the draft in recent years, who knows what the
hell will happen.
Now the Steelers have to settle down and sign their draft picks, not
have holdouts like in the past. They also have to sign Woodson NOW!!!
Give him top bucks and have him ready for camp.
JaKKe
|
35.63 | Steeler Draft rated a D ?? | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Tue Apr 30 1991 19:08 | 9 |
| After reading several good grades for the steeler draft, I read the
sporting news from late last week and it rated the steeler draft as a
flat out D. I believe I have several different papers who rated the
draft, I will see if I can't get them in here tomorrow. Just from what
I've read Huey Richarson is super intelligent and makes a lot of plays
off of intellect and instinct combined but needs to add a bit more raw
strength. Florida had a super defense and he was a major part of it.
Roy Q.
|
35.64 | Personally, I'm more excited about the two tightends. | SHALOT::MEDVID | could not hear or see for jealousy | Wed May 01 1991 10:34 | 12 |
| RE: Huey Richardson
Chuck Noll likes smart players. And not necessarily football smart,
but book smart. I think that had a lot to do with picking Richardson
first. However, recent years have proven that the Steelers coaching
staff has not been able to exploit a player's potential no matter how
smart he is.
Or maybe the Steelers were just thinking the fans needed one of those
"ew" type names for the D, since the O has "Looooooooouis" Lipps.
--dan'l
|
35.66 | Men on Football | SHALOT::MEDVID | could not hear or see for jealousy | Wed May 01 1991 11:22 | 7 |
| I like those big tightends. Ya know, yer Oklahomo types like Keith
Jackson. I tink Ewic Gween of the Steelers has a nicer tight end than
any of them, though. It's comparable to JR's plate stacker. Now I
know why the Browns have trouble winning against Pittsburgh. Bernie is
way too distracted by Ewics fly patterns.
--blain
|
35.67 | Woodson still in Pittsburgh? | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Wed Jun 19 1991 15:52 | 4 |
| Anyone know if the Steelers signed Rod Woodson or is this going to end
up another Mike Merriweather type of deal?
--dan'l
|
35.68 | | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Wed Jun 19 1991 18:23 | 4 |
|
Mike who?
|
35.69 | The annual dragging of the feet | ECAMV3::JACOB | Do nothing...Then Rest!! | Wed Jun 19 1991 19:59 | 10 |
| Dan'l
The Steelers have not signed Woodson yet, nor have they made much
progress signing draft picks.
Looks like the annual Chuck Noll's, "Rod Who, Huey Who, are they
brothers??"
JaKe
|
35.70 | I R Back From Vacation | ECAMV3::JACOB | Since 1st I had, Worst I had Was GOOD! | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:27 | 6 |
| The Steelers signed their #1 Pick, Hugh Richardson to a 4 year contract
worth $2.8 million.
JaKe
|
35.71 | So..... | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Tue Jul 16 1991 09:12 | 5 |
|
Won't make any difference.....
Have they signed a new QB yet?
|
35.72 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothers | Tue Jul 16 1991 18:04 | 12 |
| The Steelers still have not signed Free Agents Rod Woodson and David
Little.
Sources here in Pittsburgh for both sides say that they are making
progress in getting Woodson signed and expect his contract to be inked
in the next week or two.
There was no word about the status of David Little's negotiations.
JaKe
|
35.73 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jul 17 1991 13:25 | 13 |
|
re: Jake
I wouldn't to concerned about Little. He's been around for awhile
now, and with their No. 1 pick slated for a inside LB spot, I wouldn't
think Little would be a priority. I'd be more concerned about Woodson
since he is one of the best CB's in the league.
Other than that, it's good to see their No. 1 get signed so early.
bill..g.
|
35.74 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothers | Wed Jul 17 1991 16:42 | 16 |
| With Little making the pro-bowl lasted year and having just come off of
a fine season, I think the Steelers HAVE to sign him. Richardson
probably won't get tons of playing time this season while he learns the
ropes. Word around here is that the Steelers are moving Richardson to
an outside LB slot so he can play OLB in a 3-4 and jump up to DE in a
4-3, like when they play the Bungholes and their wussfull no-huddle.
Woodson does remain their top priority at this time, though, IMHO.
Re signing Richardson already....Sure is nice to see the #1 in camp
after only missing 4 days, versus seein the #1 miss 4+ games and
hearing the Noll-isms about no contributions possible etc....
JaKe
|
35.75 | Full camp should help | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Jul 17 1991 19:03 | 16 |
| What were the numbers on Huey. I'm not sure but did I hear 2.6 mil
over 4 years. If so it doesn't sound like to much to pay if he pans
out as a #1 round draft pick. It is good to have him in camp. Maybe
the steelers would have scored touchdowns earlier in the season had
Green been in camp after only missing four days last year.
Any little tid bits of news coming out the camp thus far Jake? How are
the signings going for the steelers other draft picks. In particular
the wideouts.
I know the Pirates are still holding the 1 spot in the east so thus
they still have the headlines. Any news would be appreciated though.
JAKE -- Sorry about system time and lic. problem vms upgrade went
arwry.
|
35.76 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothers | Wed Jul 17 1991 23:49 | 27 |
| Chuck Noll and "Mean Joe" Greene have both blasted Aaron Jones in the
past few days. They say he has the talent but is just not using his
head. It was reported that he is still throwing his temper tantrums
for which he was so highly penalized in his rookie year. Jones is in
his 4 th year and this training camp is his make or break. If he
doesn't get his head together fast, he'll be gone before the season
starts.
Eric Green, second year TE, lost 20+ pounds in the off season and is
wieghing in at 265 now. Reports from camp are that Green more
resembles a Wide receiver coming off of the line than a tight end.
Look for an awesome year out of Green, who not only is very fast, but
runs excellent routes and has great hands and is also tough to bring
down after he catches the ball.
Steelers have signed a pick or two but I don't have any names. The
Wideouts that were drafted have yet to sign, though. Tom Donohue needs
to get his ass in gear and get em signed.
Louie Lipps is out right now for the next week with a cracked rib and
will practice then while wearing a flack jacket, so the Steelers need
to get the rookie receivers into camp PRONTO!!
More news when I get it.
JaKe
|
35.77 | Men of Steel | SHALOT::MEDVID | Back to the Heavyweight Jam | Thu Jul 18 1991 10:26 | 11 |
| > Chuck Noll and "Mean Joe" Greene have both blasted Aaron Jones in the
> past few days. They say he has the talent but is just not using his
> head. It was reported that he is still throwing his temper tantrums
I wish Noll would start saying the same thing about Brister.
Why did Green need to lose weight? He was awsome at 285 last season.
Does this mean he'll be faster? He's certainly not stronger since
muscle weighs more than fat.
--dan'l
|
35.78 | Black and Gold revving it up | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Jul 18 1991 15:54 | 26 |
|
RE: Jones
I don't know what the deal is with steeler #1 picks at DL I don't think
one has panned out since Mean Joe himself. Drafting is such an unexact
science. There was quite an uproar, me included, when a tight from
relative obscurity was selected #1 last year and he turns out to be a
monster with suction cups for hands.
We really need those wideouts in camp. Louis Lipps has been quite
injury prone lately after some stellar early years. Of couse, it could
have come from the abuse he received in the early years.
Thanks for the info Jake keep it coming!!!
-.1
Buster does needs to get his butt in gear(drive not overdrive) and his
head outta park or worse yet reverse in some instances.
Can't remember where I read it over the winter but at seasons end but I
do recall Green saying his goals for this year were to decrease his body
fat%, work on his blocking skills, and digest more of the complex
offense. I hope copied that last goal.
Roy L.
|
35.79 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothers | Thu Jul 18 1991 18:02 | 12 |
| Roy hit it on the head with Eric Green's personal reasons for losing
wieght.
Word out of camp is that Green has gone from good to great by losing
the weight and has picked up some speed and resembles a WR more than a
TE, but can block.
Joe "Booger" Walton has said that Green is the best TE he has seen in
his 31 years in Football, but who listens to Walton anyway??
JaKe
|
35.80 | Dwayne Woodruff Retires | ECAMV3::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMADDMothers | Fri Jul 19 1991 19:33 | 9 |
| Forgot to put this in here.
About a week or so ago Dwayne Woodruff announced his retirement from
the Steelers. He had been in the NFL for ~12 years. He holds a law
degree and is a limited partner in a law firm here in Pittsburgh.
JaKe
|
35.81 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | Back to the Heavyweight Jam | Mon Jul 22 1991 08:44 | 6 |
| Can anyone out there post or point me to the Steelers' preseason
schedule?
Thanks.
--dan'l
|
35.82 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Jul 25 1991 12:16 | 26 |
| What's the latest news from the Steeler's training camp ?
Have Woodson and Little signed yet ? How about their #2 and #3 draft choices,
Graham and Mills ?
It's good to see their #1 draft choice join the team early enough to keep
Noll happy. How's Huey Richardson doing ?
How about the 2 new tight ends, Cooper and McCon...? I remember watching
Adrian Cooper play against the CU Buffs and was very impressed. He's
got good hands, good speed and is hard to bring down. On top of that, I
think he's a Colorado Springs native. Along with the Green monster, I
think the Steeler's have a good chance to have the best set of tight ends
in pro football. And unless the Steeler's make some improvements with
their wideouts, they'll need the best set of tight ends in football to
be competitive.
Since I'm also a CU Buff fan, I'm hoping free agent Gary Howe and #10 or
#11 pick, Ariel Soloman can make the team. Howe, who looks like a fire
plug, played great at CU, especially rushing the passer. But the
big knock on him is that he may be too short(6'1") for the pros.
So what's up in Steeler land ?
Colorado_Keith_who's_a_Pgh_native_but_rarely_gets_any_news_on_his_
favorite_pro_team
|
35.83 | Mini Update | CELTIK::JACOB | D.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMaddMothers | Thu Jul 25 1991 16:49 | 29 |
| Unless something happened today that I didn't hear about, Woodson,
Little, Graham, and Mills all are still unsigned. Mills and the
Steelers are close, but the Steelers want 3 yrs with an option year and
Mills agent is saying no to the option year. The Steelers then made an
offer without the option year but with decreased bucks.
Noll came out with the annual, "they're missing too much camp and may
not make the team" jargon yesterday. Mills, local theory is, may not
make the team anyway, if his performance in mini-camp is anything of
a clue as to how he'll perform. Graham it has been said in the papers
here, is almost a shoe-in to make the team regardless of when he signs.
The Tim Worley saga continues. This is the year that many feel will be
the make or break year, or the "Is Worley another Walter Abercrombie or
Greg Hawthorne" year. Worley, though, is having mucho problems with
his back and has seen a couple of specialists about these problems,
with each saying that they can find no problem. Worley practiced
yesterday in the morning session but sat out the afternoon session
because his "back stiffened up"
Haven't heard much ala Huey Richardson 'cept for the broken nose he got
when he ran into someone's elbow in practice in his second or third
session.
More when it comes in,
JaKe
|
35.84 | More Steeler News | CELTIK::JACOB | Swallowing Saliva causes Cancer | Thu Jul 25 1991 21:11 | 21 |
| Rumor from Steeler Camp is that Terry Long has failed the NFL steroid
test and will be suspended from 2 weeks of training camp and the first
four regular season games. The Steeler offices admit that Long is in a
local Pittsburgh hospital but have no comment on the Steroid charge.
The Steelers held a 2 hour scrimmage against the Redskins lasted night.
The result was a 19-19 tie. The Place-kickers were the busy players in
the scrimmage. Gary Anderson kicked field goals of 57, 41, 38, and 29
yards, while missing from 54 and 53 yards while another 53-yarder hit
the crossbar and bounced back. He also had a 43 yard attempt foiled by
a bad snap. Chip Lohmiller hit from 48, 46, 39, and 28 yards.
Steeler Injuries:
Terry Long(hamstring), Donald Evans(ribs), Louis Lipps(ribs), Tim
Worley(back), Thomas Everett(thigh), Eric Green(back) and Huey
Richardson(broken Nose).
JaKe
|
35.85 | | FDCV06::KING | If the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Jul 26 1991 09:03 | 4 |
| I had heard this morning that a Steeler tried to commit suicide last
night.... Has any one heard this????
REK
|
35.86 | The scoop on Long | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Sox Fall Again | Fri Jul 26 1991 12:11 | 16 |
| Piottsburgh Guard Terry Long was hospitalized Thursday and treated for
an apparent suicide attempt.
Earlier it was reported that Long had failed a steroids test
administered by the Steelers on July 11.
It was reported that Long ingested Rat Poison. LOng, 32, a starter for
6 1/2 seasons, faces a NFL-imposed suspension. As a first-time
offender, he would miss two weeks of practice and the first 4 regular
season games.
Steeler and NFL officials have declined comment.
Taken without persmission from USA Today.
JD
|
35.87 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | Swallowing saliva causes cancer | Fri Jul 26 1991 21:45 | 102 |
| (reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 26-Jul-1991)
LONG FAILS STEROID TEST
(hospitalized for swallowing rat poison)
Steelers right guard Terry Long, who tested positive for steroids and
faces a four game suspension, was in Allegheny General Hospital last night
after swallowing rat poison.
Long was admitted to AGH Wednesday night after paramedics and several
police cars were called to his residence on Sturbridge Drive in Franklin Park.
Neighbors said the ambulance and police were at Long's home for several hours.
"He was taken by ambulance to the hospital," said Jim Bennett, an officer
of the Franklin Park Police Dept. "He appeared to be in relatively good
condition."
Bennett declined to give a reason for the ambulance call or discuss Long's
ailment.
It was not immediately clear under what circumstances Long swallowed the
rat poison, but he walked into the AGH emergency room under his own power.
Long, who turned 32 on Sunday, will be suspended by the NFL for the first
4 games of the season because of his positive test for steroids, a substance
that enhances size and strength and has been banned by the NFL.
Long, listed as 5 feet 11, 278 pounds, was the Steelers fourth round draft
pick in 1984. The Steelers media guide claims he is the shortest lineman in
the NFL. He increased his weight from 160 in high school, and was considered
the nation's strongest player at East Carolina.
He started seven games as a rookie and has been a starter at guard since.
But he was facing stiff competition this year from Carlton Haselrig, a
298-pounder who was the Steelers 12th round pick in 1989.
Long on Tuesday informed several teammates of his positive test result.
Neither the league nor the Steelers would confirm for the record that Long
had tested positive for steroids. But the team is aware that Long was recently
notified by Dr. John Lombardo, the NFL's adviser on steroids, about his
positive test. Long and his teammates took the NFL's mandatory steroids test
July 11 at their St. Vincent College camp in Latrobe, Pa.
"It's a league matter," said Dan Edwards, the Steelers public relations
director. "Dan Rooney was in communication with the league. That's where this
stands right now. Rooney said he would have no comment at this time."
The only thing the Steelers would confirm last evening was that Long was
in a Pittsburgh hospital.
Rooney, the Steelers president, visited training camp yesterday afternoon
but left without speaking with reporters.
After the teams regular afternoon practice, Coach Chuck Noll approached
reporters, threw up his hands and said, "You guys know more than I do." He
then walked away.
Karen Long, an AGH spokeswoman, and not related to Terry Long, said, "I
can't give you any informaiton. My hands are tied."
Steve Courson, a former teammate of Long's who has admitted past steroid
use, said Long's girlfriend called him Wednesday afternoon and told him that
Long tested positive.
"She was wondering if it was possible if he could appeal," Courson said
last night.
Long's girlfriend, whom Courson only knows as Denise, told him that Long
tested for a high level of testosterone. Courson told her that such appeals
have been possible in track and field, but he didn't know the procedure in the
NFL.
Steelers center Dermontti Dawson said he and other teammates were
concerned about Long's health.
"I just hope he's all right," Dawson said, "I don't know whats going on.
We'll just have to wait and see. There are a lot of unanswered questions right
now, I don't want to say too much. We're concerned, that's basically it."
Long, who could not be reached at the hospital for comment, has a
hamstring injury. He was one of 10 injured Steelers who did not make the trip
to Carlisle Wednesday for a scrimmage againt the Washington Redskins. The
injured players were free to go home Wednesday, and Long's neighbors said that
is what he did.
He had been in and out of practices the first two weeks of camp because of
the hamstring injury, and he also missed the scrimmage agaisnt the Redskins in
Latrobe on July 17th.
However, he was with the team this week at their training camp site.
Greg Aiello, the NFL's director of Communications, said he had no
information on steroids tests from any player this year. He said if a player
tests positive for steroids, the league in due time would announce it along
with the punishment mandated by the NFL's substance abuse policy.
Under that policy, a player who tests positive for steroids in the
preseason is suspended for 2 weeks from practice and the first four regular
season games. He then must have a negative test before he will be allowed to
resume play.
Should a player fail a 2nd time, he would be suspended for six games, and
a third offense draws a minimum one year suspension.
The NFL instituted mandatory steroid testing in 1989 and 13 players were
suspended by the league that year for testing positive. one of those was
Rollin Putzier, a Steelers defensive lineman at the time he took the test in
training camp. Before the results were announced, Putzier had been cut by the
Steelers and signed by the 49ers, where he served his 30 day suspension.
Three NFL players tested positive last year and were suspended for three
regular season games. The league increased the punishment to four games this
year.
The only other Steelers known to have tested positive for steroids ate
guard Tom Ricketts and defensive lineman Craig Veasey. Both, however, had
positive tests at the league's combine workouts before they were drafted by the
Steelers--Ricketts in 1989, and Veasey in 1990.
Both players explained that their positive test was the result of a
steroid based medication they took in college for an injury. Heither was
disciplined by the league.
Beginning in 1990, all NFL players are subject to random steroid testing
both during the season and the off-season. Aiello said once a player has
tested positive, he most likely will be tested more frequently.
JaKe
|
35.88 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer, The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:17 | 24 |
| The Steelers signed their #2 pick , Jeff Graham, WR, lasted week. No
terms available.
Steelers beat the Redskins last night, 16-7. Brister actually looked
pretty good(I know, it's only the first pre-season game). He had 2
TD's called back due to penalties.
Neil O'Donnell saw his first action with the
Steelers as QB and looked pretty good. His passing was fairly accurate
and he showed some poise. Strom may have problems retaining the #2
spot.
The Steelers are REAL unhappy with Tim Worley. It was announced Friday
that he has been moved down to 7th on the depth chart at running back.
He is currently sitting out with a back problem, although he has been
examined and examined and examined and none of the Doctors can find a
thing wrong with him. Maybe if they did a brain scan it'll also show
nothing.
I'll put the stats in here later tonite if'n I get a chance.
JaKe
|
35.89 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | A who a say dere ain't no Jah? | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:48 | 10 |
| > Steelers beat the Redskins last night, 16-7. Brister actually looked
> pretty good(I know, it's only the first pre-season game). He had 2
> TD's called back due to penalties.
What was the call, ineligible mommy downfield?
How many times did they show Bubbly Blister's mum clasping her hands
over her face during the course of the game?
Mark.
|
35.90 | Bubby's Mum | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Mon Aug 05 1991 18:03 | 15 |
| Bubby's mum is holding out this season. Dan Rooney has done his best
to sign her, but her agent, Alexis Carrington, is one tough cookie.
Apparently holding up the negotiations is a "signing" bonus...she is to
be paid $1000 every time she is caught performing the sign of the cross
on national TV.
Chuck Noll was quoted as saying, "There's no way she can help the team
now. I don't even know if she'll be ready to start at all during the
season."
In the meantime, Betty White has taken her place on the roster.
Hip Herp Holps.
--dan'l
|
35.91 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Mon Aug 05 1991 18:13 | 9 |
| re.90
Dan'l, got any Windex handy???? Just got iced tea all over the screen
and keyboard!!!
Good one
JaKe
|
35.92 | Meaningless game #1 Stats | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Mon Aug 05 1991 21:58 | 50 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
Washington 0 7 0 0 7
STEELERS 0 3 3 10 16
SCORING SUMMARY
Pitt-FG anderson 37yd
Wash-Ervins, 19 yd pass from Conklin(Lohmiller PAT)
Pitt-FG Anderson 27 yd
Pitt-Fair 34 yd pass from O'donnell(Anderson PAT)
Pitt-FG Anderson 54 yd
TEAM STATS:
Washington STEELERS
15 1st Downs 23
16-64 Rushes-Yds 32-122
194 Passing Yds 207
14-33-0 Comp-Att-Int 20-27-0
2-18 Sacked-Yds Lost 2-18
0-0 Fumbles-Lost 0-0
6-45 Penalties-Yds 9-61
23:02 Time Of Possession 36:58
Individual Stats:
RUSHING
Washington:Riggs 6-27, Byner 7-15, Ervins 2-13, Rutledge 1-9
STEELERS: Foster 11-51, Hoge 5-36, Thompson 5-14, W.Williams 3-12, Worley 4-10,
O'Donnell 4-(-1)
PASSING
Washington: Rypien 3-8-0-74yds, Conklin 6-9-0-89, Humphries 3-8-0-38, Rutledge
2-8-0-11.
STEELERS:Brister 11-14-0-114, O'Donnell 9-13-0-111
RECEIVING:
Washington: Ervins 3-60, Hobbs 3-27, G.Clark 2-42, Stanley 2-31, Whisehunt
2-14, JiJohnson 1-32, Sanders 1-6.
STEELERS: Fair 3-54, Green 2-33, Calloway 2-25, Foster 2-20, Thompson 2-15,
Hoge 2-12, L.Davis 1-14, Lipps 1-12, Mularkey 1-11, McGonnigal 1-10, Worley
1-8, O'Shea 1-7, W.Williams 1-4.
JaKe
|
35.93 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Aug 06 1991 16:50 | 7 |
|
Jake,
Any progress to report on Woodson or Little?
bill..g.
|
35.94 | That's for all those horrible jokes | SHALOT::HUNT | Who invented liquid soap and why ??? | Tue Aug 06 1991 16:53 | 7 |
| � Jake,
�
� Any progress to report on Woodson or Little?
Nope, JaKe's woodson is still very little.
Bob Hunt
|
35.95 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Tue Aug 06 1991 16:54 | 14 |
| I haven't heard anything about the David Little negotiating, but
Woodson's agent said that the team made an offer at the end of lasted
week and that he was going in with a counter offer sometime this week.
Haven't heard any more since then.
Woodson's position is slightly stronger since the guy(can't remember
the name) who was projected to be a back-up cornerback this year broke
his arm in the game against the Redskins and will be out all season.
More when it comes in
JaKe
|
35.96 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Tue Aug 06 1991 16:57 | 12 |
|
>> Nope, JaKe's woodson is still very little.
>> Bob Hunt
Only at rest. The Mrs. tends to use "two-hander" when refering to it,
though(and that's not meaning one for the tweezers and the otherhand
for the magnifying glass either!!)
JaKe
|
35.97 | Game time this Saturday... | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Wed Aug 07 1991 11:53 | 7 |
| Can someone please confirm the start time of the Steelers Vikings game
this Saturday. My Steelers schedule says 9:00 PM. Note 5.440 ('91
Pre-Season) says it is at 7:00 PM.
Thanks.
--dan'l
|
35.98 | Go Steelers! | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Wed Aug 07 1991 12:00 | 4 |
| Never mind. It seems 5.440 are Montain Time postings. Game's at
9:00 EST. (Why so late?)
--dan'l
|
35.99 | | CELTIK::JACOB | I LUV CATS-they taste like chicken | Wed Aug 07 1991 17:12 | 8 |
| dan'l
could be cause they're playing in Minnie-soda and it'll be and 8
o'clokk start there.
JaKe
|
35.100 | | CELTIK::JACOB | NOW OPEN, JaKe's Deep Fried Cathouse | Tue Aug 13 1991 09:50 | 12 |
| The Steelers signed Ernie Mills, their 3rd round draft pick, to a 2
year contract with a third year option, for a reported $840,000.
he is the last of the Steeler draft picks to sign.
Chuck Noll, being true to form, has stated that his late signing has
left him no chance to make the team, so I expect a pro-bosl year out of
Mills.
JaKe
|
35.101 | Vikes game summary | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:07 | 7 |
|
Jake,
Do you have a game summary or synopsis for the Vikes game. Of course
that one didn't make the tube in Atlanta.
Roy L.
|
35.102 | Not much, but this may help | CELTIK::JACOB | JaKe's Deep Fried Cat House | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:20 | 18 |
| Roy,
Unfortunately, I was out with the wife and munchkins all day and part
of Saturday night. Can't find the Sunday paper, either for the stats.
I will say this much though. Neil O'Donnell is breathing down
Brister's back. The Steelers receivers dropped 8, count em, 8 passes
in Sat's game. 2 of those passes would have been sure TD's.
Both QB's performed good in the game, but turnoveritis in the first
half left them behind 27-3 at the half.
I'll see if I can find the newspaper and get some of the stats or a
synopsis for ya.
JaKe
|
35.103 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Knows his way around a G string | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:28 | 5 |
| Question for Steeler fans....
If Bubbly Blister (tm) is benched, will his mother ground him?
Mark.
|
35.104 | Mama Blister to start in Pittsburgh! | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Thu Aug 15 1991 00:44 | 3 |
| They plan on bringing in mama blister as backup. She is the one who
taught Booby everything he knows.
|
35.105 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Budweiser, Breakfast of Champions | Thu Aug 15 1991 13:58 | 9 |
| The Steelers announced that, barring injury, Ernie Mills, WR and 3rd
round draft pick will get a lot of playing time this week. Mills just
joined the Steelers after holding out and I guess this is their way of
giving him all possible chances of making the team, which, being true
to form, Chas. Noll has given Mills no chance of.
JaKe
|
35.106 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Whatever happened to Honeysuckle Divine?? | Thu Aug 15 1991 17:20 | 6 |
| Tim Worley is out for the rest of the pre-season. Arthroscopic surgery
yesterday, wonder whether it was on a knee or his BIG HAID!!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.107 | | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Fri Aug 16 1991 01:13 | 6 |
| Is it really safe to say that Ernie Mills is getting a chance to make
the team? Who is going to be throwing the ball to him. The starting
QB?............I don't think thats a fair chance to make the team.
Maybe they should really try Boobies mom out!
The Rookie
|
35.108 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thataboy George, screw those unemployed | Fri Aug 16 1991 10:10 | 13 |
|
You guys keep picking on Bubby go ahead...you'll eat your words soon
enough. He now has Green to open up the field for both him and Lipps.
He's had a year experience with the offensive system so he'll make
better reads this year.
Considering he threw 20 TD's to Elway's 15 and Bernice's 10 and less
interceptions than the two of them you guys are standing on shaky
ground that's about to turn into an earthquake...
BubbleHaid to lead the Steelers to the Bowl this year....
mike
|
35.109 | | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Fri Aug 16 1991 11:04 | 9 |
|
>> BubbleHaid to lead the Steelers to the Bowl this year....
Have to agree. The Bubster looks pretty confident so far this year. Last
year at this time he was a mess.
Any more news on Woodson?
Warren
|
35.110 | Got the sticks in your car? | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Fri Aug 16 1991 11:06 | 7 |
|
Just remember who one of Clevelands 3 wins was against last year, Mike.
Bubby took some real nice shots in that one too..
Anyhow, usual wager on this years games?
/Jeff
|
35.111 | of course... | CNTROL::CHILDS | thataboy George, screw those unemployed | Fri Aug 16 1991 12:03 | 0 |
35.112 | Trying to cause a stir on Friday, Aeeee | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Fri Aug 16 1991 12:27 | 7 |
|
Oh come on Mike, what plane did you get off on? The wrong one for
sure! Someone like Bubble Butt Baby Boy Buster Brown will never go
anywhere in the NFL!
Dirty Dawg
|
35.113 | Bubby Delivers! | ACESMK::MEDVID | Merrimack: homme away from home | Fri Aug 16 1991 13:11 | 4 |
| Bubby looks real accurate in the Dominos Pizza commercial. Hits that
phone right between the numbers!
--dan'l
|
35.114 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Larry, Curly, and Modell | Fri Aug 16 1991 13:58 | 2 |
| With Bernie and Bubby throwing in that commercial you know they must've
gotten the wrong number. :^)
|
35.115 | Took longer than 30 minutes for sure | ACESMK::MEDVID | Merrimack: homme away from home | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:33 | 10 |
| Actually, they had to film the commercial several hundred times because
each time it was Kosar's turn to throw, he kept dialing
1-900-HOT-GUYS
Meanwhile, Bubby kept hitting the numbers for his home in Louisiana
because he wanted to tell his mum all about the commercial. Little did
he know, she was in the studio watching from the rafters.
--dan'l
|
35.116 | ah your mother wears army boots.. | CNTROL::CHILDS | thataboy George, screw those unemployed | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:34 | 8 |
|
> With Bernie and Bubby throwing in that commercial you know they must've
> gotten the wrong number. :^)
Atleast they were good enough to make the commercial. Smellway got AXED
when he ask for operator's assistance....
mike
|
35.117 | NOW THATS SOME RECORD | EAYV01::ATHOMSON | | Sat Aug 17 1991 02:41 | 10 |
| Guess what the Squeelers have lost six straight to the mighty Bengals
now thats some record,i suppose it will be eight after this season
just thought i would remind you squeeler fans that the Boomer and
the boys like to kick ass at Three Rivers.
Scotlands NO1 Bengal Fan saying
Have a nice day no offense meant
Get the joke no offense HA HA
|
35.118 | Bubbles a QB? | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Sat Aug 17 1991 08:41 | 11 |
| Mike,
I'll give you credit on the TD throws. Beating Bernie and mom is
really not a challenge. I see Bubbles and Boobie in the same league.
I'm not a Denver fan but I will stand up for Elway. Elway has brought
the Broncos to 3 or 4 superbowls, Last year he threw 5 less TD's but
ran in 3 TD's to Bubbles "0". Also had 2 + 300 yd games to bubbles 1.
If Pittsburgh makes it to the big one it will be on the back of a great
defense and not on the arm of a Junoir QB.
The Rookie
|
35.119 | ex | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Sat Aug 17 1991 08:55 | 8 |
| I've got to correct myself before you big Browns and Steeler fans
hammer me. I confused Bubbles mom with boobies mom. See, my mistake
was that we can tell the differences in their moms. I shouldn't confuse
their sons with them. My apoligies to the moms.
The Rookie
|
35.120 | | 11887::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 20 1991 09:45 | 16 |
| The Bengals - Steelers series has been just as even as the Bengals -
Browns series if not more so. After the 1989 season, the Steelers led
the series 20-19 with 765 pts to Cincinnati's 741. There have been 9
splits, 6 Pittsburgh sweeps (including the one game played in 1982) and
5 Cincinnati sweeps. This series has been a lot more streaky than the
Browns - Bengals series. Pittsburgh won 9 of 12 during its Super Bowl
years of 1974-79. Cincinnati has won 8 of the last 11, winning the 4
games in 88 and 89, after Pittsburgh had won 3 straight and the Bengals
had won 4 straight. Again, this is through 1989 only since I don't
have this year's record book yet.
In case any of you Pittsburgh or Cleveland fans ask, Cleveland has
dominated the bulk of the series having gone 48-32 against Pittsburgh
through 1989.
John
|
35.121 | Game summary and Steeler News | CELTIK::JACOB | Where's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days? | Tue Aug 20 1991 12:56 | 81 |
| Pre-season Game #3
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 3 0 17 0 20
Philadelphia 7 7 0 7 21
Scoring Summary:
Phil--C.Williams 4yd pass from Cunningham(Ruzek PAT)
PGH---FG Anderson 36yd
Phil--Cunningham 1 yd run(Ruzek PAT)
PGH---Calloway 15yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
PGH---Cooper 9yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
PGH---Anderson 27 yd FG
Phil--Sanders 1 yd run(Piocki PAT)
TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS Eagles
15 1st downs 16
23-139 rushes-yds 27-55
108 passing yds 151
17-33-3 comp-att-int 17-26-2
4-35 sacked-yds lost 2-17
4-31 punting 6-38
2-1 fumbles-lost 2-1
9-95 penalties-yds 8-50
31:23 Time of possession 28:37
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: Foster 12-94, Hoge 6-25, Stone 1-17, Thompson 3-3, O'Donnell 1-0
Eagles: Drummond 9-27, Cunningham 4-12, Sherman 5-8, McPherson 1-5, Sanders
7-5, Goebel 1-(-2).
PASSING:
STEELERS: Brister 6-14-2-25, O'Donnell 11-19-1-118
Eagles: Cunningham 11-14-1-107, McPherson 2-4-1-13, Goebel 4-8-0-48.
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Thompson 4-34, Lipps 2-22, Foster 2-19, Cooper 2-13, Calloway 1-15,
McGonnigal 1-11, Mills 1-7, W.Williams 1-5, O'Shea 1-5, Hoge 1-(-1).
Eagles: Byars 3-37, C.Williams 3-35, Sanders 3-23, Keith Jackson 3-19,
Harris 2-17, Drummond 2-16, Shuler 1-21.
THEY'RE BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!!OH NO!!!!!NO "O" JOE IS HERE AGAIN!!!!!
Bubby Brister and the 1st string offense have played the first half of each of
3 pre-season games and they have yet to produce a TD that wasn't negated(2),
dropped(1), or caught inches out of bounds(1).
The Steelers have scored 6 offensive TD's so far this pre-season. Of those
6, Neil O'donnell has thrown for 5TD's and directed the drive for the other TD.
Brister has played the first half of each game and has only produced 9
points.
If Barry Foster doesn't get the start at running back on opening day,
better call Frank Drebbin and Police Squad to investigate, casue the job will
have been stolen from him. Foster had runs of 32, 29, and 20 yards en route to
his 12 carry, 94 yard performance. Add in his 2 catches for 19 yards and
Foster had 113 yards in 14 plays, compared to 134 yards on 46 plays for
everyone else.
Rookie cornerback finally showed the from that made the Steelers trade up
in the draft to get him, intercepting a Don McPherson pass to set up[ a TD,
only to suffer a sprained knee when McPherson tackled him late, when he was
already down and out of bounds. Walker was the only new injury. Hardy
Nickerson made the trip but didn't play(hip pointer). 15 other players didn't
make the trip. These were Delton Hall, Tim Worley, Gary Jones, A.J.Jenkins,
Dean Dingham and Rich Drayton, all out after some sort of surgery or another.
Six others nursing minor injuries were Tunch Ilkin(hamstring), Eric Green(lower
leg), Greg Lloyd(ribs), Rick Strom(ribs), Jeff Graham(thigh), and Ricky
Byrd(foot). Rod Woodson and David Little are still unsigned and Terry Long is
not in camp after attempting suicide.
Negotiations for Woodwon are not progressing well at all. Both sides
agree that they are not close on either length of contract or dollars. The
Steelers remain about $375,000 apart on a 3-year deal offered Little, who has
been offered $2million.
JaKe
|
35.122 | Barry Foster Rookie of the Year? | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 01:08 | 13 |
| Barry Foster had some good looking stats the last game. Do you know
what his other stats looked like? I'm not fond off Bubby but I do like
the backfield and the "D" of Pittsburgh. If they can get a great
running game establioshed and the defense play like last year they
I think they'll take the Central Division. Yes Hal, Over the Browns.
10 wins for the Browns will be really stretching it but they will
improve from last years record if they stay healthy. Belinchick knows
how to play a defense to stop teams. The only thing is that Pittsburgh
can boast the best "D" in the NFL last year and should stay in the top
5. Let me hear from steeler headquarter on whether Barry will start or
not.
The Rookie
|
35.123 | Some info for ya, Rookie | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Wed Aug 21 1991 09:52 | 20 |
| > -< Barry Foster Rookie of the Year? >-
Nope, this is his second year. He is best remembered last year for
treating a kickoff like a punt against SF and giving the 49er's a TD.
> The only thing is that Pittsburgh
> can boast the best "D" in the NFL last year and should stay in the top
> 5.
Not a chance without Woodson and Little.
>Let me hear from steeler headquarter on whether Barry will start or
> not.
I too think Barry Foster should be a starter, but Noll has an affinity
for Warren Williams. Williams is a complete running back whereas
Foster is not that good a blocker. If Foster can improve this aspect
of his game, he will no doubt start.
--dan'l
|
35.124 | where to watch 'em | HBAHBA::HAAS | Saint Frank and the Magic Cow | Wed Aug 21 1991 11:34 | 6 |
| Dan'l
You may have mentioned this before, but where do you guys meet to watch
the SteelHeadburghers? Is the public invited?
TTom
|
35.125 | SRO (for now) | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Wed Aug 21 1991 11:53 | 14 |
| TTom,
We moved the club this year to SRO (Standing Room Only) Pub and Deli.
It's in Tyvola Place Mall in between the Bi-Lo and Target stores.
I'm not real confident about this move, though, as I don't think this
guy has a top-o-the-line satalite system and package. For instance, we
weren't able to pick up the feed out of Minessota a few weeks ago. I
think we'll be OK for the regular season but I'm still worried.
And sure, the public is invited and we really don't care what team you
root for as long as you have fun.
--dan'l
|
35.126 | what about Picasso | HBAHBA::HAAS | Saint Frank and the Magic Cow | Wed Aug 21 1991 13:37 | 6 |
| Thanks.
Didn't one of the Picasso's do this last year? I know the one at
Providence Square does the Brown's games.
TTom
|
35.127 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Where's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days? | Wed Aug 21 1991 17:03 | 13 |
| Steeler's roster is down to 60 now. They waived a bunch of free agents
and no names, but also waived center Chuck Lanza, DE A.J.Jenkins, 7th
round draft pick Andre Jones.
Jenkins, plus free agents Ricky Byrd and Rich Drayton were waived after
reaching injury settlements.
QB Sam Mannery, free agent out of California, was retained and as of
right now is the third string QB, since Rick Strom aggravated his rib
injury Monday during practice.
JaKe
|
35.128 | Picasso's went bust | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:19 | 8 |
| Steelers club was at Picasso's Providence Square lasted year but we
left because:
- It was too small
- It went out of business
- The owner of SRO is from Pittsburgh (well, WV)
|
35.129 | | OPUS3::JACOB | Drive 2 show, Put Out the Dough | Wed Aug 21 1991 22:47 | 39 |
| Once again, the Steeler first string offense is showing signs of
altzheimers(sp?). They have forgotten where the end zone is. Now I
know it's only pre-season, and there's one more game that doesn't
count, but the 1st string looks like sh!t!!!! The second string
offense has far outclassed, outplayed, and outscored the 1st string,
even if they have played against other second stringers. Neil
O'Donnell has shown lots of poise and touch at QB, also. Brister has
put up numbers that most QB's would be ashamed of for one game, and his
are for 3(halves).
Hers is a summary of 1st half(1st string) vs. 2nd half(2nd string), so
far
Category 1st half 2nd half
Points 9 51
First Downs 18 42
Yards 312 577
3rd Down Conv 3-16 8-18
Turnovers 5 4
Penalty Yds 131 75
Brister vs O'Donnell is as follows
Compl-Att-Int Total Yds TD Scoring drives Rating
Brister 23-43-4 182 0 0 25.6
O'Donnell 34-53-3 403 5 6 94.8
O'Donnell is looking like he may be the person to unseat Brister for
the #1 QB slot. Now I DO remember Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone so I
won't get my hopes too high, but maybe Emperor Noll, when Brister is
having one of those 3-23 games, won't hesitate to yank him and give
Neil his chance.
JaKe
|
35.130 | | CAM::WAY | Mighty Mouse kicks butt | Thu Aug 22 1991 08:36 | 4 |
| It's nice to see that people can be realistic about their teams.
It's a refreshing change from *some* topics in here ;^)
'Saw
|
35.131 | THE RETURN TO HELL - Pittsburg theme '91 | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Thu Aug 22 1991 09:36 | 17 |
|
Hey Saw!
What are you talking about? I'm realistic. The
Browns have put up some good numbers this preseason so far. So there!
Jake,
It is pretty much normal for the the 2nd string QB to
throw the ball more. Lets face it, the coach wants to see what he
can do. The same goes for Cleveland. The Browns have to deciede who
will be the backup, Frances or Pillcox. Pillcox took the lead because
he came through in the pressure situation. I think your right about
giving the guy the chance though. The first sign of Bubble Butt
Burning Bald Bone Baby Buster Brown crying for Mom, he should be taken
out and sent to his room.
Dawg Gone
|
35.132 | I'll stick with Brister | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Thu Aug 22 1991 11:22 | 23 |
| > It is pretty much normal for the the 2nd string QB to
> throw the ball more. Lets face it, the coach wants to see what he
> can do.
In this case, however, it is not normal. The Steelers second-string
QB, Rick Strom, continues to re-injure his ribcage muscle pull. There
really isn't much competition for the second string job now.
Brister is still the man and it would be very premature for anyone to
assume Neil O'Donnell will take a snap this season unless Brister gets
hurt.
Noll is set in his ways. Unfortunately, so are Pittsburgh fans. When
Stoudt stunk they called for Malone; when Malone was maligned they
called for Brister. I can almost hear the calls into Myron Cope's
sportstalk:
"Yeah, Mahrn, yeah I thinkis Nick MacDonald guy should start
at QB this year. Yunz thinkina same thing?"
Insert sounds of Myron going absolutely bonkers. Yoy!
--dan'l
|
35.133 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Where's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days? | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:45 | 20 |
|
>>I can almost hear the calls into Myron Cope's
>>sportstalk:
>> "Yeah, Mahrn, yeah I thinkis Nick MacDonald guy should start
>> at QB this year. Yunz thinkina same thing?"
>>Insert sounds of Myron going absolutely bonkers. Yoy!
>> --dan'l
OK Dan'l, are you getting WTAE down there now or did you hear my call
when you were in Pgh????? I didn't think you'd get wind of my call but
you put it in here word for word!!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
35.134 | | CAM::WAY | Mighty Mouse kicks butt | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:47 | 7 |
| Damn, if that don't sound Pennsylvania though.
Funny thing is that out there the women sound the same way....
(used to date a girl from PA)....
'Saw
|
35.135 | Woodson Signs!!! | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Fri Aug 23 1991 10:29 | 9 |
| Rod Woodson signed a contract last night. The report I heard said he
was now the highest paid defensive player in the NFL...and he's worth
it.
The Steelers will still be lacking at ILB. David Little will be hard
to replace and I would think the money they are going to pay Woodson
might hurt Little's chances at getting the hefty sum he wants.
--dan'l
|
35.136 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I want a job like Randy West's | Fri Aug 23 1991 12:15 | 6 |
|
I don't think so Dan-l. He gets 1.3 million. I believe LT, Reggie White and
a few others make more than that. He's probably the highest paid secondary
player in the league though...
mike
|
35.137 | The Lockerroom | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Mon Aug 26 1991 13:48 | 9 |
| TTom (and others in Charlotte wondering where to watch the Steelers):
We've bagged SRO as of Friday since he couldn't pull in the game.
Obviously not the place to watch the Steelers. We are now
unnofficially headquartered at The Lockerroom (next to Lizzie's, across
from the Embassy Suites on 49). This is where we shoulda been all
along, black and gold from top to bottom.
--dan'l
|
35.138 | Bubby's Backup Booted | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Mon Aug 26 1991 15:36 | 14 |
| Just got word from up Pittsburgh way that the Steelers cut last year's
second string QB Rick Strom who injured himself before the first
pre-season game. In his place, they kept a kid (don't know his name)
who rewrote the record books last year at California University of
Pennsylvania.
This makes second-year QB Neil O'Donnell Brister's backup.
My question is: Strom was an adequate QB who showed flashes of talent
when he got in the games last year; why cut him, why not put him on IR
for the year? I don't think the rookie even got into a preseason game,
did he?
--dan'l
|
35.139 | | OPUS3::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Mon Aug 26 1991 17:04 | 6 |
| The Steelers cut the 3rd string QB today, too. Also cut TE Terry
O'Shea. Can't remember the others that got cut.
JaKe
|
35.140 | If Brister AND O'Donnell get hurt then what? | SHALOT::MEDVID | so drowned you were angels | Mon Aug 26 1991 17:14 | 14 |
|
> The Steelers cut the 3rd string QB today, too.
Probably so they could keep all those running backs. Not a bad move.
Question is, can one of those RB or one of the WR be listed as 3rd
string QB?
>Also cut TE Terry O'Shea.
Was that the rookie from Virginia? He cut himself by getting a case of
the dropsies Friday night. Glad to see Mike Mularky make the squad.
He's a valuable vet.
--dan'l (member ovat ah Nick Macdonald guy fanclub, yenz know?)
|
35.141 | Last year Dallas cut all there kickers on this day | HPSRAD::SANTOS | The return of Doomsday in BIG D | Mon Aug 26 1991 17:23 | 13 |
| >>> -< If Brister AND O'Donnell get hurt then what? >-
Dan'l,
A lot of teams drop there 3rd string QB's on this day. Most will
bring them back tomorrow. You see, if you place a guy on the IR
today hes has to be on the IR for the WHOLE season. Tomorrow most
teams will move players to the IR where they can stay there for
only 6 weeks and bring back quite a few of the backup players.
Once the real season start injuries usually solve this over load
in players.
Chuck
|
35.142 | Game Summary later tonite | CELTIK::JACOB | Where's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days? | Mon Aug 26 1991 17:29 | 13 |
| -dan'l
O'Shea has been with the Steelers at least since last spring, but
they cut him lasted year also and then brought him back when Mularkey
lost his knees.
Re Mularkey, there was a story in one of the Pgh rags a week or so ago
about Mularkey and his knees are shaky at best. He is only able to
practice one day a week, and says his knees are *SORE* after that, but
he's still able to do the job on game day.
JaKe
|
35.143 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Where's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days? | Mon Aug 26 1991 19:19 | 24 |
| Announced Steeler moves as of 18:00 today,
Waived:
Rick Strom, QB
Terry O'Shea, TE
Efrom Thomas, Safety
Ariel Solomon, Tackle
Released:
Cornell Berbich, WR
Sam Mannery, QB
Gary Howe, NT
Kevin Smith, Safety
Ron Fair, WR
The Steelers are expected to announce the rest of their moves tomorrow
morning.
Also, I have misplaced my paper from Saturday and DO NOT have the game
summary from the Steelers drubbing of the Detroit Lions. If anybody
has the game summary and stats would you please enter it in here.
JaKe
|
35.144 | A reprieve from Bengal fans | EMDS::UCCOOP | | Tue Aug 27 1991 19:41 | 14 |
| I MUST know where I can go in the greater Boston area to see the
Steelers play on TV. I MUST know. The ten minute ticker just ain't
gonna cut it.
Ed the coop
Whose_parents_are_from_Pittsburgh_but
who_moved_to_Ohio_and_whose_son_(me)_
goes_to_the_University_of_Cincinnati_
and_has_to_put_up_with_BUNGLE_fans_all_
year_and_who_is_transplanted_to_Maynard
_for_the_summer_but_is_nevertheless_
a_died_in_the_wool_STEELER_fan!
|
35.145 | Mike Mularkey | CELTIK::JACOB | Honeysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong balls | Tue Aug 27 1991 21:46 | 54 |
| Reprinted from the Pittsburgh Press, 8-26-1991, without permission
MULARKEY RUNNING FROM PAIN OF INJURIES
by Steve Hubbard
Humans have performed phenomenal feats in times of terror, and that might
as good an explanation as any for Mike Mularkey's sudden surge of fleet feet and
pain-free knees.
"Running scared," a rejuvenated Mularkey said Friday night after his 25
and 23 yard catches set up the Steeler's first ten points in their pre-season
finale, a 16-3 victory against the Detroit Lions. Mularkey appeared quicker
and faster than he had in months, reassuring not only himself but his coaches
that he can be an important part of their offense for another year.
Mularkey, 29, did not want to retire, but his balky knees, particularly
his right one, had forced him to miss a lot of practice time and hampered his
performance when he was out there.
His coaches did not want to retire him or waive him because they admired
his courage, leadership, sure hands and solid blocking, but they also liked
their four young tight ends and did not want to release one if Mularkey could
practice only a day or so a week and then play on Sundays on aching knees.
They knew he would practice if the pain was at all bearable, and so they let
him go at his own pace for most of minicamp and training camp.
Coach Chuck Noll spoke glowinglu of Mularkey's toughness and said he could
skip a practice or two a week, just as John Stallworth, Donnie Shell and others
did late in their careers when practice could have done more harm than good to
their aching joints and muscles.
But two weeks ago, offensive coordinator Joe Walton told Mularkey and the
media that he would have to press hard to see if his knees would hold up.
"No matter what they said, I didn't feel good that week," Mularkey said.
"I couldn't practice every day because my knees hurt so bad. But this past
week has really been encouraging."
Mularkey practiced all last week and said his knees felt better than they
had since camp opened. Mularkey doesn't know if they simply got better on
their own or for some strange reason were less irritated by 3 Rivers Stadium's
artificial turf than St. Vincent College's grass. All he knows is he really
needed a good week abd a good game, and he got them.
"My confidence level was really low. I was just disappointed that the
knee had bothered me as much as it had. I felt good in all of the games; the
adrenaline was flowing. My problem's been not being able to practice. It
showed I hadn't practiced because I didn't play very well. I'm the type of
player who needs to practice to play well on Sundays."
A couple of other recent developments convinced the coaches to keep
Mularkey when they cut the roster today.
Eric Green figures to be the focus of the offense, but he's missed the
past three games with an inflammation in his knee. He's expected to return to
practice late this week and play in the regular season opener against the San
Diego Chargers, but if he can't play full time, they need Mularkey's experience
and receiving ability more than ever.
JaKe
|
35.146 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Honeysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong balls | Tue Aug 27 1991 22:01 | 22 |
| Steelers roster moves are as follows:
Placed on IR:
Gary Jones
Delton Hall
Sammy Walker
Signed to practice squad:
Ariel Solomon
Jarrod Johnson
Gary Howe
Ron Fair
Recalled to the team:
Kevin Smith
Shawn Vincent
One roster slot is still open, that will be filled by the addition of
Rod Woodson later this week.
JaKe
|
35.147 | Whom to contact in Beantown | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Wed Aug 28 1991 09:30 | 11 |
| Ed,
Contact Linda Hooke of the Pittsburgh Boston Club. Her number is
617-495-7744. She lives in Summerville.
You can tell her you got her name from me (Daniel Medvid, Black and
Gold Club of Charlotte).
Good luck to yunz.
--dan'l
|
35.148 | David Little signed! | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Wed Aug 28 1991 11:15 | 14 |
|
So it seems David Little has signed. Any quotes from Emporer Chas?
Assuming that they stayed in shape on their own, anyone else think that Woodson
and Little are going to be pretty impressive during the end of the season
because they skipped the preseason? Do they lose any pay for missing the
preseason?
I missed Delton Hall's injury. What's he out for? Would he have started
anyway?
Looking forward to a super season - the Bubster permitting.
Warren on Sports
|
35.149 | Thanks in advance | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Aug 28 1991 15:22 | 5 |
| Whats the Steelers Recieving Squad look like, they drafted a speedster
in the 3rd round who held out 2 long. NOLL felt he wouldnt make the
team due to the holdout, I dont recall his name but I dont think He's
been Cut..Details please
|
35.150 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:49 | 12 |
| Well lets see....Chargers @ Steelers.
Chargers: Good D, good special teams, no passing game, new qb, Butts
just now got into camp.
Steelers: At home, good D....but how's the offense....how's the
special teams? Has Walton instituted more offensive
changes? Is Brister ok with them?
How 'bout some light on this.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
35.151 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | ForBestResults,SqueezeFromBottom | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:56 | 8 |
| Bubbly Blister's (tm) mom will be in attendance.
Joe Walton's index finger will be in attendance.
Hence, Chargers and the points.
HTH,
Mark.
|
35.152 | Some info | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:57 | 23 |
| RE: 149
None of the Steelers 1st string and rookie receivers had much of a
chance to show much in the preseason due to Brister's poor showing.
With that said...
RE: 150
Glenn,
Unless the Steelers offense wakes up like it did against San Diego last
season, Chargers should win in a low-scoring game. Steelers continue
to lack a pass rush and it looks like another five weeks or so for the
offense to click.
The only way I see the Steelers winning this one is if the secondary
picks off a few and puts Anderson in field goal range because Brister
can't seem to move the team. The only other hope offensively is the
running of Merill Hoge and Barry Foster. Eric Green was hurt last I
heard.
--dan'l
|
35.153 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:33 | 7 |
| dan'l -
Why are the Steelers having problems with this offense? Isn't it the
same one that they used last year? Is there somethin' new to get used
to?
Glenn
|
35.154 | Steelers by 7 to 10 | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Aug 28 1991 21:54 | 17 |
|
dan'l
I tend to disagree with your game summary. Because of the following
reasons. The chargers have no passing game and the steelers run
defense is their strong suit because of the lack to pass rush. The
steeler db's are still the best in the league. The offense for the
steelers hasn't been fluid but there have been a few big plays in the
preseason. If those plays don't occur at the time of penalty the
steelers will be fine.
I suspect a 17-10, 20-13 or 20-10 victory for the steelers will
transpire. It also helps that they are at home.
Roy L.
Almost time to get my fix!!!!!!
No more substitutes for this football junkie.
|
35.155 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Honeysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong balls | Wed Aug 28 1991 21:58 | 16 |
| Glenn, their offensive problems, according to the papers here in
Pittsburgh, are mostly because Joe "Booger" Walton has implemented
completely the complex offense he simplified after a few games lasted
year. It remains to be seen how the Steelers will adapt to this
offense, but, I could be offering a Steeler mug again this year if they
don't get their asses in gear.
Also heard a rumor that the playbook has some problems with the
diagrams of the plays, seems Walton made the copies himself and some of
the originals had some "residue" fromople "Booger" Joe's fingers and
the players are confused as to the pass routes the receivers are
supposed to run .
JaKe
|
35.156 | list them all | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:02 | 19 |
|
Oh comeon...why not list a few more...you'll surely get one...
7 - 0
14-7
21 - 17
32 - 21
etc.....
The Squeelers can't do anything right with
BUBBLE BUTT BONE BABY BOARD BRAT BUSTER BROWN at the helm!
Dirty Dawg
|
35.157 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Thu Aug 29 1991 12:25 | 7 |
| Well, I'll be watching with NFL eyes on Sunday. With any luck for me,
Friesz will have another hot day and my Chargers will prevail.
Do I have a prediction? .... yes, the Chargers won't lose by 5 pts or
more.
Glenn
|
35.158 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Fri Aug 30 1991 17:02 | 51 |
| I got this off the internet
The Bubby story:
Here's a short article from this weeks Steelers Digest:
Reprinted without permission.
Quarterback Club: After a good showing in two preseason outings,
some people were a bit premature in wondering how long
quarterback Neil O'Donnell would remain a backup. Bubby Brister
has a firm grip on the starting spot, but is glad to see his
backup doing well in his first season. "This is my team, and
it's my job," Brister said. "I'm happy for Neil. He's like a
brother to me, and I'm glad he's doing a great job. But once we
get going in the regular season, nobody will remember what
happened in the pre-season. Once I'm playing well and we're
winning games, people will come back to the real world."
Other news:
Woodson hasn't signed as of this paper (aug 24).
The defense really misses him. The offense vs the Eagles (3rd
preseason game) sounded OK. There were a few things like holding
etc that hurt drives, but the running game seemed to be going
really well. Hodge and Foster (Merril Hodge, Barry Foster).
Foster has beenb known to be fumble prone, and that's why he
didn't get much time last year. This year, Tim Worley is down
for a couple of weeks for knee surgery.
Foster is also the "very silly person" who let the kickoff roll
to the five yard line in last years game against the 49er's. The
9er's took it in for a touchdown (kickoffs are live, unlike
punts), and never looked back.
Foster is tearing up camp, and should be a lock to start. It's
only his second year, so he could be a great one.
After the loss to the Eagles, the Steelers are 1-2 in pre-season.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ZIP "Guitar playing is like sex, except half
Hey Marty! Hey Lance! way through a gig, you can switch guitars."
BUBBY LIVES! (I hope) GOOOOOO KEEENNNN, I mean SAINTS!
|
35.159 | SD double duty or slight of hand | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Aug 30 1991 20:07 | 11 |
|
.158
Could there be some slight of hand going on here or multiple
plublications calling themselves Steeler Digest. I have at hand the
august 24 issue and the previously stated words are yet to grace my
eyes. Granted those sound like some of Bubby's words but if one could
be so kind as to direct me to them(ie page numb) I would be glod
consume me words.
Roy L.
|
35.160 | O-'-D-O-N-N-E-L-L for cripes sakes! | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Mon Sep 02 1991 16:33 | 16 |
| Well, I almost called it on the nose a few days ago. Not the way the
game would be played, nor the score, but the Steelers fans ridiculous
penchant for wanting another Bradshaw and having no patience in the
rebirth. What I'm talking about is what I heard while watching the
game with some fellow Burghers yesterday:
Brister misses a wide open Eric 'Big' Green streaking toward the
endzone. Brister doesn't even see him but everyone else does. And
from the back of the room comes "Bench Brister! Put that MacDonahue
guy in!"
Cleveland fans may be predictable assholes, but no one beats Steelers
fans for lack of knowledge about their own team. Myron Cope would have
loved this guy.
--dan'l
|
35.161 | long gestation! | EMDS::UCCOOP | | Tue Sep 03 1991 09:58 | 31 |
| Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to
locate a place that beamed in Steeler games. Being as such, I'd like to
know some specifics about the Charger game. Here follows some points
that I would love some more info on:
*Is it true that Brister had a number of passes dropped?
*From the stats it looked like Foster had a good game.
Elaborations anyone?
*I have heard rumours that the pass rush fairy has once
again skipped the Steel City and left it with no
decent pass rushers. Is this true?
*Four field goals! Were these shoulda-been-touchdowns (ala
first four games of 1990)
*How was Woodson? Richardson?
Regarding the impatience for the rebirth of Bradshaw II mentioned
in the previous reply, remember that the gestation period has been
unusually long and painful. It takes a sturdy and strong hearted fan
to endure the blazen brilliance of Stoudt at the helm, the breathtaking
aerial circuses we came to love in the Woodley era, and the precision
accuracy and come from behind magic of Mark Malone. This is Brister's
fourth year at the helm. Steelers fans want results, not promises.
I give Brister this year. (At least the first six - eight games, if
he can come back at all, that is. We may see more of Neville McDonough
than we bargained for!) Bradshaw took some time too, but at the stage
of his carrer comparable to where Brister was, the Steelers were in the
Championship game.
All in all, thankful for the win. On to Buffalo.
Ed the Coop
|
35.162 | It wasn't out on the satelites for some reason | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Tue Sep 03 1991 10:33 | 48 |
| > Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
> the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to
> locate a place that beamed in Steeler games.
The three places in Charlotte that said they would show the Steelers
games came up empty too. We were forced to make a mad rush to a
mammoth, impersonal sports bar that showed ALL the games at once on
four big screens.
> *Is it true that Brister had a number of passes dropped?
No more than usual I would summise.
> *From the stats it looked like Foster had a good game.
> Elaborations anyone?
I would guess Foster averaged about 3-4 YPC. I am impressed. Worley
is history if Foster stays healthy and fumble free. JaKe will probably
enter the stats if he is at home.
> *I have heard rumours that the pass rush fairy has once
> again skipped the Steel City and left it with no
> decent pass rushers. Is this true?
No pass rush to speak of. Thank goodness for a great secondary.
> *Four field goals! Were these shoulda-been-touchdowns (ala
> first four games of 1990)
Two of them should have been TDs. The offense stalls once inside the
40. However, the last TD shouldn't have been. It was the second
longest pass play in Steelers history. Mark O'Douglas threw about an
eight yard pass to Dwight Stone deep in the Steelers end, Stone broke
some tackles, stayed in bounds (amazing), got a great block by Lipps
who took out three defenders at once, and Stone was off 80 yards to the
endzone. So, the only play designed to go for a TD that actually did
was the Steelers' first, Brister to Calloway.
> *How was Woodson? Richardson?
Woodson was great, David Johnson, even though he was fooled on a
halfback option that went for a TD, may be even greater in my opinion.
I didn't hear Richardson's name called the whole game. Jerry Olsavsky
out of Pitt may have been the most improved player. He's added about
30 pounds and #55 was in on every other defensive play.
--dan'l
|
35.163 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Tue Sep 03 1991 12:56 | 10 |
| > Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
> the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to
> locate a place that beamed in Steeler games. Being as such, I'd like to
> know some specifics about the Charger game. Here follows some points
> that I would love some more info on:
The game was on Ku band, not C band. I found it on satellite K2,
transponder 31.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
35.164 | Bubby II | EMDS::UCCOOP | | Tue Sep 03 1991 16:22 | 7 |
| Just read that Brister is expected to start Sunday's game vs Buffalo.
Reports said he suffered a minor concussion and that it wasn't serious.
Guess we'll have to wait to see more of Mike O'Dougal, but certainly
not Anderson.
Ed the Coop
|
35.165 | | OPUS3::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Tue Sep 03 1991 17:12 | 16 |
| Woodson had six tackles and 3 passes defended.
I'll enter the stats from the game either tonite or tomorrow nite.
Don't have the sports section with the stats available, so I gotta get
to my father's house and steal his.
Richardson had 1/2 a sack, as far as I remember.
Didn't get to see but the lasted 4 minutes of the game, was out camping
and the batteries went dead on the portable TV. Guess I gotta break
down and buy a portable generator if'n I'm a goin campin again on game
day.
JaKe
|
35.166 | Game Summary and Steeler Notes | OPUS3::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Tue Sep 03 1991 22:15 | 109 |
|
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
San Diego 0 3 0 17 20
STEELERS 3 7 6 10 26
STEELERS-FG Anderson 38yd
SanDiego-FG Carney 48yd
STEELERS-Calloway 33 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 29yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 31yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 39yd
SanDiego-Lewis 11 yd pass from Bernstine(Carney PAT)
SanDiego-FG Carney 35 yd
STEELERS-Stone 89 yd pass from O'Donnell
SanDiego-Jefferson 5 yd pass from Friesz(Carney PAT)
TEAM STATISTICS
San Diego STEELERS
20 1st Downs 16
23-95 Rushes-Yards 32-120
186 Passing Yds 270
31 Return Yds 60
20-42-1 Compl-Att-Int 14-25-2
3-17 Sacked-Yds Lost 1-8
5-50 Punts 3-40
2-1 Fumbles-Lost 3-0
5-30 Penalties-Yds 7-56
28:19 Time Of Possession 31:41
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
San Diego: Bernstine 12-50, Harmon 4-42, Butts 5-6, Friesz 2-(-3)
STEELERS: Foster 17-78(4.0/carry), Hoge 13-41(3.2/carry), O'Donnell 1-5,
Brister 1-(-4).
PASSING:
San Diego: Friesz 19-41-1 int 192 yds, Bernstine 1-1-0 int, 11 yds
STEELERS: Brister 13-21-2 int, 189 yds, O'Donnell 1-4-0 int, 89 yds
RECEIVING:
San Diego: Lewis 6-74, Miller 5-54, Jefferson 3-23, McEwen 2-13, Walker 2-12,
Cox 1-19, Harmon 1-8
STEELERS: Stone 4-124, Foster 3-48, Calloway 2-47, Green 2-30, Hoge 2-15,
Lipps 1-14
STEELER NOTES(reprinted from Pittsburgh Post Gazette, without permission,
9-2-91)
Linebacker Greg Lloyd is so mean that sometimes he forgets the laws of
self-preservation.
Law No 1: When head-butting a teammate who is wearing a helmet, make sure
yuou are wearing one, too!!
Lloyd forgot that rule after he jumped on a fumble by San Diego QB John
Friesz on the first series of yesterday's(Sunday's) game between the Steelers
and the Chargers.
He was so excited that he whipped off his helmet, head-butted teammate Rod
Woodson, threw the football 8 rows deep into the stands and then sat stoically
on the bench as trainer Ralph Berlin applied a bandage to the cut on his
forehead.
"Sometimes we get a little fired up out there and we do some things we
shouldn't do," Woodson said. "That was one of them."
The damage to Lloyd's head hardly deterred him. After that, he came up
with 2 QB sacks and six tackles, earning a game ball from his teammates.
Lloyd did nothing unusual in a defense that has put more emphasis on
coverages than blitzes.
"It's the same defense," he said. "I think I know the defense now. If
you know what you're doing, you can make a lot of things happen."
SHADES OF TERRY:
Steeler fans struck a 20-year old chord when they cheered in the 4th Qtr
as backup QB Neil O'Donnell came onto the field for injured starter Bubby
Brister.
At the time, Brister was crumpled on the turf after getting sandwiched
between LB Leslie O'Neal and DE George Hinkle after he delivered a pass.
Brister, who suffered a mild concussion, eventually wobbled off, high fiving
O'Donnell.
The cheers were reminiscent of the time in the early 70's when fans at
Three Rivers Stadium cheered after Terry Bradshaw hurt his shoulder. There
was a QB controversy then between Bradshaw and backup Terry Hanratty. and there
has been a slight QB controversy in the exhibition season because O'Donnell
played so well in 2 games.
"He took a helluva shot at the end," said O'Donnell, who said he was
concentrating too much on the next play to hear the fans. "I think Bubby will
be OK."
Brister was alternately booed and cheered by the 55,848 fans.
STONE STEADY:
Twice last season, WR Dwight Stone inadvertently stepped out of bounds on
what would have been sure long touchdown passes.
Yesterday, he snapped up O'Donnell's short pass at the 12 and converted it
into an 89 yard TD reception without once coming near a sideline.
"I stayed in bounds!!" Stone said triumphantly.
"It was one of those games that one big play makes a difference and I
think the big play was Stoney's," Coach Chuck Noll said. "And Stoney stayed
in bounds."
Added OT John Jackson, "That was a great catch. When I saw he had only
one man to beat, I just waved goodbye. Because nobody is going to catch
Stoney--unless he steps out of bounds."
JaKe
|
35.167 | fingers crossed | CNTROL::CHILDS | Life during Wartimes... | Wed Sep 04 1991 11:42 | 7 |
|
Jake, you have the Steelers fumbling 3 times and loosing none whilst the
Chargers had 2 fumbles and lost 1. My paper had it the other way. Can you
or someone else (possibly Glenn who watched) confirm who's paper is correct?
If Jake's correct I win in FFL, if not I loose...
mike
|
35.168 | I think you win, Mike | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Wed Sep 04 1991 12:34 | 3 |
|
To the best of my knowledge, for what that is worth, JaKe is correct.
|
35.169 | Elementary my dear Watson!!! | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Sep 04 1991 12:35 | 8 |
|
If the notes that Jake entered are correct then his stats indeed have
to be correct as well. If Lloyd recovered a fumble by John Friez, that
would give you the one fumble lost by SD.
Could be wrong but just an observation.
Roy L..........'Watson
|
35.170 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Sep 04 1991 12:45 | 9 |
| Sorry, I don't recall who fumbled how many times and lost how many, but
in today's USA Today, the stats for the Steelers say:
Take-away: 1 Int + 1 Fum = 2 total
Give-away: 2 Int + 0 Fum = 2 total
Chargers figures also bear this out....so there you go.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
35.171 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Sep 04 1991 13:12 | 6 |
| Mike, I can absolutely confirm that you, my man, might be correct. On
the other hand, maybe you aren't.
Hope this hurts,
lEe
|
35.172 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:58 | 2 |
| Brister suffered a concussion and is cleared to play after only 1
week? Sounds a little dangerous to me.
|
35.173 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Honeysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong balls | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:12 | 7 |
| From what they're saying here, it was only a MILD concussion.
Then again, he's a thick-haided Southern Boy, so that could explain it.
JaKe
|
35.174 | ;^) | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:31 | 10 |
| JaKe,
Actually he had a Corncussion.
Corncussion: you stepa ona my toes, hurt me and I cuss ya out sucka!
HTH
Kev
|
35.175 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:44 | 7 |
| All I know is that the hit he took looked pretty damn hard. Leslie
O'Neal hit him from behind and thrust him forward and then a split
second later, George Hinkle hit him from the front and removed his
helmet. I was surprised to see him walk off the field on his own.
I hope he's ok.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
35.176 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:50 | 2 |
| Come on Glenn, how cain a guy named "Leslie" possibly hit somebody
hard?
|
35.177 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:50 | 8 |
| There is evidence that a person who gets hit in the head again after
suffering a concussion can die. The USARFU and other rugby governing
bodies recommend at least a 2 week layoff after suffering a concussion.
There is no distinguishing between a mild and a severe concussion.
It should be noted that these are recommendations. Players on the US
national team have taken the field a week after suffering a concussion.
This has caused a bit of concern.
|
35.178 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Sep 04 1991 21:09 | 7 |
| > Come on Glenn, how cain a guy named "Leslie" possibly hit somebody
> hard?
I remember when the Chargers drafted him out of OSU, and that's what I
thought at the time. It's kinda funny.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
35.179 | | FDCV06::KING | RED SOX, lies, and videotapes!!!! | Thu Sep 05 1991 11:10 | 3 |
| What happened to Worley
REK
|
35.180 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Sep 05 1991 12:27 | 7 |
|
> What happened to Worley
I believe he's out with a knee injury and it will be 2-4 weeks before
he'll be able to play. I also think he's been demoted to 3rd string.
Keith
|
35.181 | Strap your hats boyz | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Sep 06 1991 16:50 | 14 |
|
The steelers have one of those put ^ or shut ^ type games coming this
weekend. Normally I would give the steelers much of a chance but
Buffalo showed considerable weakness in it's run defense. If the
steelers can run the ball to consume time and score on the drives,
along with a better than average defensive effort which they are
definitely capable off, I give them a shot in a close game. Of course
those are a lot of ifs'. 26 points is not a huge offensive day but it
will win most steeler games. Producing that many points and holding
the bills will be a job.
A Gary Anderson FG wins it at the buzzer!!!
Roy L.
|
35.182 | | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Fri Sep 06 1991 17:27 | 9 |
| Well, the network gods have seen fit to televise the PITT-BUFF game in the
D.C. area, sunday @1:00. Eager to see what the Steeler-D can do with the
hurry up. Thurmon Thomas worries me alot. Big Test for Pittsburgh. And not
a bad test for Buffalo, who might still be harking back to the Miami game.
At least the Bubster won't have to worry about Bruce Smith who will not be
playing.
Warren
|
35.183 | Buffalow? | EMDS::UCCOOP | | Mon Sep 09 1991 10:47 | 0 |
35.184 | Steelers get a wake up call? | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:17 | 26 |
| Buffalo 52, Steelers 34
52 points against the mighty Steeler D. 6 Td passes by Jim Kelly.
I thought the game was over at halftime, the Steelers were definitely staring
at the abyss. But they looked good for the third quarter - two INT's - but
Bubby couldn't push in the touchdown to tie the game and Steelers were back
into the abyss.
I was kind a dissappointed with Woodson, got burned pretty bad by Lofton and
then missed some kick-of returns because he was out of Oxygen. But, everybody
looked out of Oxygen and Kelly's passes were right on.
The comparison between Kelly and Bubby makes you wonder. I mean Bubby was OK
but he's not going to any super bowls unless he gets alot better. Kelly was
great, except for the two INT's - but he adjusted right away. Also, Thurmon
Thomas' run in the third quarter - when he was basically injured - was the
ballgame. Great back.
So the Steelers have seen what a great team looks like. Can they regroup and
get it together by the playoffs?
Warren
P.S. I hadn't seen Joe Walton in action before. Boy, he needs some help.
He just can't keep his hands away from his face!! It's unbelievable.
|
35.185 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:37 | 19 |
| Since they were on national TV, I finally got to see the Black and Gold
play this year. What happened to the league's top rated defense ? I quess
they're just not as good as last year's stats indicate.
The Steeler's definately got robbed when Kelly fumbled the ball trying to
avoid the pass rush and probably got robbed when they ruled the pass intended
for Hoge was intercepted and run back for a TD. But I don't think either
bad call would have made any difference. Buffalo definately played better
football. Kelly looked awesome and Brister looked average at best. But
in all fairness, the Steeler offensive line didn't give Brister as much
time as he needed.
On the bright side, Barry Foster looks like the best Steeler running back
since Franco Harris. Also, did anybody else see the block by Eric Green
on Foster's long TD run ? That has got to be the most devastating block
I've ever seen. It looked like Green knocked the guy 4 or 5 feet in the
air.
Keith
|
35.186 | | GOBUCS::COOLEY | The Pittsburgh Fan in D.C. | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:44 | 9 |
| Yeah, I forgot about Barry Foster. He looked good, but didn;t get enough
chances.
I think the great block on his long run was by #87 (forget his name) and
not Green - although Joe Willie though it was Green too. Namath did a
pretty good job, though, I thought. But maybe I was just glad that we didn't
get enberg and Coach walsh.
Warren
|
35.187 | The silver lining: | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Mon Sep 09 1991 14:18 | 19 |
| A few things I was impressed with:
- Barry Foster. He has star written all over him. Great mid-round
pick last year.
- Eric Green's block. Yes it was #86. Made Keith Byers' block
on Pepper Johnson last year look like a pat on the rump. Wow
did he level that guy!
- Jerry Olsavsky. My goodness what a steal in the 11th round.
He was all over the field. For a linebacker that small, he
sure plays tough. Shows what you can overcome if you play
smart ball.
- The Bills and Jim Kelly especially. But remember that their
defense gave up a lot of points also, and for two weeks in a
row at that.
--dan'l
|
35.188 | 1-1 and who knows what lies ahead | CELTIK::JACOB | SEX IS DIRTY..only when done properly | Mon Sep 09 1991 22:05 | 55 |
| SCORING SUMMARY
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 10 17 7 34
Buffalo 10 14 7 21 52
Buffalo- Lofton, 53 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo- FG Norwood 50 yds
STEELERS- FG Anderson 25 yd
Buffalo- Beebe 34 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo- Beebe 14 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS_ Foster 56 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Buffalo- Reed 14 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS- W.Williams 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS- Hinkle 57 yd interception return(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS- FG Anderson 27 yd
Buffalo- Beebe 11 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo- Beebe 4 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo- Odomes 32 yd interception return(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS- Hoge 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Attendance-79,545
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Buffalo
14 1st Downs 31
23-152 Rushes-Yards 40-194
113 Passing Yards 343
15-29-1 Comp-Att-Int 31-43-2
2-21 Sacked-yards Lost 2-20
6-36 Punts 2-32
0-0 Fumbles-Lost 1-1
9-63 Penalties-Yards 5-53
26:53 Time Of Possession 33:06
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS----Foster 9-121, Hoge 10-32, W.Williams 4-(-1)
Buffalo-----Thomas 15-107, K.Davis 17-56, Gardner 6-21, Reed 1-11, Reich 1-(-1)
PASSING:
STEELERS----Brister 15-29-1-134 yds
Buffalo-----Kelly 31-43-2-363 yds, Reich 0-0-0-0
RECEIVING:
STEELERS----Hoge 4-36, Mularkey 3-42, E.Green 3-31, Lipps 3-29, W.Williams 2-6
Buffalo-----Beebe 10-112, Reed 9-118, Lofton 4-78, Thomas 4-35, McKeller 2-22,
Metzelaars 1-1, K.Davis 1-(-3).
JaKe
|
35.189 | Steeler Notes | CELTIK::JACOB | SEX IS DIRTY..only when done properly | Mon Sep 09 1991 22:14 | 27 |
| Did anybody else who watched the Steeler game yesterday think they saw
Harvey "Toast" Calyton in the Steeler secondary??????Could've sworn I
saw him!!!!
Woodson and David Johnson got beat bad, BUT, was Thomas Everett
conspicious by his inability to get to where he should've been.
Numerous times he failed to give the help that is his to give deep.
Re Brister, I ain't going to condemn the guy, nor will I praise him,
BUT, if Kelly was only getting about 2 seconds to throw, do you think
they would've pummeled the STEELERS the way they did????
I say "Nah".
Brister was most effect when the play was designed for him to roll out
to avoid the pursuit while looking for his receivers. If the Steelers
don't start giving him time, it's going to be one long season.
Foster gained the most yards since Earnest Jackson gained 125 vs. the
Chiefs in 1987. He injured his ankle on his 9th carry, but he returned
in the 4th Qtr, but only carried one more time, and that was nullified
by a penalty.
Hinkle's 57 yd TD interception return was the longest Int return by a
Linebacker since Chuck Noll became coach.
JaKe
|
35.190 | long season indeed. | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:37 | 15 |
|
Another INT.....the streak continues!
When are they going to take him out of the game........not the
coach.........the other team.
Face it Jake, the Squeelers will go no where with .....
BUBBLE BUTT BONEHEAD BARF BELLY BEAN BAG BUSTER BROWN trying to
lead the team through a game. The guy already threw 3 INT'S this
year. How many TD's has he thrown? If he was a real QB, he would
dump the ball off to someone out of the backfield instead of getting
his BUBBLE BUTT kicked!
Dirty Dawg
|
35.191 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:46 | 5 |
| > If he was a real QB, he would
> dump the ball off to someone out of the backfield instead of getting
> his BUBBLE BUTT kicked!
I thought real QB's ate the ball, like Bernice?
|
35.192 | Squeelers by 14....????????? | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:52 | 12 |
|
Wrong Mr. Way......your Way out!
Bernie would eat the ball and take the sack if no one was open or
there was a chance of an INT. If the rush is comming fast.....he dumps
the ball off to backfield man.....METCALF.
If BUBBBBBBLY doesn't start watching Bernie or one of the other top
5 QB's in the league, he won't walk by the end of the season.
BTW, Bernie has had plenty of time to throw the ball this year!
Dirty Dawg
|
35.193 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Tue Sep 10 1991 10:13 | 10 |
| > Wrong Mr. Way......your Way out!
Hardly ever. And it's "you're" not "your".
Anyway, I'm just repeating what you said yesterday. If you said it, and
then qualify it later with "Well, in this case he does this, and in that
case he does that", then how can I be wrong?
If you've got an answer for that, call Unsolved Mysteries.....
|
35.194 | Bills Day | FSOA::HEANEY | | Tue Sep 10 1991 11:17 | 19 |
| I watched most of the Bills game and I was impressed with the Bills,
it looks like they can score at will. I don't think it matters what
team they play they will score.
I was very impressed with Foster he is going to be a great running
back.
Did any one else see Walton picking his nose? He is in love with his
nose, he is always touching it, has his hands on it etc etc.
Bottom line: it was the Bills day and the Steelers where this weeks
victims. Do the Browns play the Bills this year? If they do and the
Bills play as they did against the Steelers the Browns will get smoked.
JMHO
Mike
|
35.195 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Sep 10 1991 13:12 | 50 |
|
First things first. I did not see the game, so I can only comment
on it through replays and news articles.
Before I'd jump all over the Bills bandwagon, I'd remind many that
they scored at will because they were playing the Steelers. I never
believed the No. 1 ranking the defense earned last year which I believe
was mainly due to a weaker schedule. I have thought for years that
the Steeler's on defense were doing it with mirrors and Sundays game
seemed to indicate that.
For the life of me, I don't understand how one of the best, if not
the best corner in the league can get beat badly not once, but twice.
I might be able to accept this a little more if it were one of the
best receivers in the league, but Lofton has seen better days and I
wouldn't put him in the top 10.
Looking at the stats around tackles shows that the defensive
backfield was real busy which isn't good. Again, no pass rush. You
would think that they would of tried more stuff seeing that Kelly
was hurt and his mobility was hindered, but seeing that he got of
40+ attempts shows that he was able to throw at will.
Then we come down to the fact that one Steeler TD was scored by
the defense (again) and another score was set up by interceptions.
Here again we see a offense that is rather inept. Lipps only has 2-3
receptions (again) so I have to ask what is going on? People make
a big deal about Foster gaining 125 yards but was the game in question
when he was tearing it up? It was 24-10 at halftime and really should
of been 24-3. So again I have to ask, what's the big deal. Buffalo
had the game in control in the first half and probably weren't as
intense on defense had the game been closer.
Now after two games, I see the same old, same old. The offense
after a whole year and all of preseason still can't seem to move the
ball. Brister is still to inconsistant for my money. The defense is
really suspect seeing that the front 4 can't get near the QB thus
putting all the pressure on the secondary.
In all, it looks like a long season. I wouldn't be surprised to
see the Pats beat the Steelers this Sunday either. Maybe they should
lay low and hope that Van Pelt is around come draft time.
On the positive side, I'm glad to hear that Oslavsky (sp) is doing
so well. Although he was a real small LB at Pitt, he always seemed to
have his nose in every play. He seems like a guy with a lot of desire.
bill..g.
|
35.196 | | FSOA::HEANEY | | Tue Sep 10 1991 14:42 | 7 |
| re -1
I am not jumping on the Bills bandwagon and I do know they were playing
against the Steelers.
Mike
|
35.197 | a better game than the score would indicate and they'll crush NE | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will it be a boy or a girl? | Tue Sep 10 1991 16:19 | 29 |
|
Bill, it just as easily could have been 24-17 at the half as well. For some
one who didn't see the game I don't know how you can say it could have
easily been 24-3. The interception TD came in the second half. Lofton made
a great fake on Wodson turned him inside out.
I agree the lack of a pass rush killed the Steelers more than anything else.
The no huddle confused them and the humpty nine zillion crossing patterns
that the Bills run killed them.
The Bills are a marvelous offensive team loaded with weapons. As the Giants
proved the only way to stop them at this stage of the game is to keep the
ball out of there hands.
Foster's yards came throughout the game so I don't think you can chalk it up
to the Bills playing soft. More likely you can contribute the largeness of the
number to one 57 yard run that resulted in a TD. Still though he ran with
power as well as showing speed and cutback ability.
Bubby was Bubby but when he did get time he did checkoff and look for second
and third options...
The Steelers really shot themselves in the foot by jumping offsides on too
many third down plays. In all likely hood buffalo probably would have gotten
the first down anyways but it sure doesn't help when you hand it to them.
mike
|
35.198 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Sep 10 1991 16:45 | 29 |
|
It was not my intent to say that Buffalo is not a decent team and
that they looked good only because they played Pittsburgh.
I did try to say that Buffalo is not as good as some would like
you to believe, especially with a QB that can barely walk.
Steeler fans need to wake up a little because I'm getting tired
of listening to the same old song week in week out. Last year the
Steelers failed to beat a team over .500 (I think), and at present
rate, they look to repeat that. Used to be when they played a good
team, they would rise to the occasion win or loose. Lately though,
it appears they save their worst appearances for the over .500 teams.
Again, so Woodson got beat once with a good fake. Can happen to
the best of them. But twice in the same game, no way. Which reminds
me, how about defensive adjustments? Seems like some folks fell asleep
at the switch.
I'm still and will always be a Pittsburgh fan, but I refuse to
call a spade a club. Simply put, the Steeler's are no better than
a .500 team, and show no signs (with present personel) of rising
above that. Their no. 1 defense ranking last year was a fluke. In
the game that counted for the playoffs, the No. 1 defense went south
for the winter, which is something the defense of the 70's would of
never done.
bill..g.
|
35.199 | Go Pats! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | PatriotsJuggernautInvadesSteelCity | Thu Sep 12 1991 15:42 | 1 |
|
|
35.200 | Big Game's Team = Patriots...... I Love `Em ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Dec 8th, Bronco's buck Clowns and it's my B-day | Thu Sep 12 1991 20:08 | 5 |
| The Patsies can't lose this game..... They are after all the best team
to ever take the field in the history of the game of football as we
know it....... ;^)
Big Game
|
35.201 | PatriotsJugglenautInvadesSteelCity | CSLALL::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Sep 13 1991 08:54 | 1 |
|
|
35.202 | We'll take W's | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Sep 16 1991 10:48 | 6 |
|
From the highlights it didn't look pretty but that appears to be afc
central this year. Eric Green still looks like a winner. What's the
skinny?
Roy L.
|
35.203 | PIThetic | EMDS::UCCOOP | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:21 | 24 |
| Overall, I am disappointed with the performance of the Steelers.
Why? Here's why:
* No running game. (Foster had one decent 9 yarder around tackle,
which seems to be his most effective running spot, so the
Steelers decide to run him right up the middle the rest of the
afternoon and send Hoge on sweeps.)
* One touchdown. One. The offense seemed to run smoothly between
the thirties, and then just quit. But what else is new.
* Brister hit a lot of short "quick" passes to give him a rather
impressive completion percentage. But he badly missed a sure
catch to Lipps in the endzone and the third down percentage
was pathetic.
I'm fearful for next week. We all know what happens to the Steeler
offense when faced with a decent pass rush. And the Eagles..........
2-1, but does that really mean anything,
Ed the Coop
|
35.204 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:39 | 33 |
|
My first chance to see the Steeler's apart from pre-season and I
gotta say that at least there is one other team that is worse.
The Steeler's have no pass rush at all. Most of the game, Hodson
was able to stand there and fire at will. Only late in the game did
the Steeler's put some pressure on him. The Pat's were also very
effective in running the ball which scares me. Again, this points to
the front 7 in that they are not controlling the line.
As for the Steeler offense, it stunk. They have the same problems
they did 7 years ago. Once they get inside the 20, they can't seem
to score a TD. If it weren't for Gary Anderson, this team would be
in serious trouble. I also thought the playcalling was dismal at best.
Many times the Steeler's would try 2 running plays which resulted in
3rd and long situations only to find that Bubby couldn't deliver.
For all the hype about Foster, I didn't see a thing. Of course he
didn't get the ball that much, but when he did, he was stuffed pretty
good.
Major concerns for me is that the Steeler's don't have any kind of
pass rush and Brister can't seem to move the team once they get inside
the 30.
As for Eric Green, he is awesome. He was looking for people to
run over once he caught the ball. If this guy had a QB to get the
ball to him, he'd be the best in the league no problem. The guy is
a monster with great hands.
bill..g.
|
35.205 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Mon Sep 16 1991 17:58 | 16 |
| I hope the Steelers can wait one more week to get a defensive line. The
Eagles have considerable difficulty running the ball and could use a
weak line to try to get some confidence. They didn't allow the Cowboys
to get to the QB at all last Sunday, but Jimmy Mac was their leading
rusher with 19 yds. To top it off, the Eagles lead back, Thomas
Sanders, sprained an ankle and may be out for an extended period. Also
going down yesterday was Calvin Williams (WR).
I would think thatg the Steelers would need to exploit the short
passing game on early downs to try and deflect some of the Eagles pass
rush and hope for the best. The Eagles will come out trying to run the
ball down the Steelers throats and then go to a mid range passing game
when that doesn't work (which it never does).
Dennis
|
35.206 | Steelers 2-1, Iggles Nexted | CELTIK::JACOB | ItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!! | Tue Sep 17 1991 01:23 | 26 |
| Chalk up a win for the Steelers, but it sure weren't pretty.
Brister continues to fail to produce. Sure his stats were good(22-29-0
262 yds 1 td) but pure stats don't win games. IMHO, he just waits too
long to get rid of the ball, or he throws it too soft when he should
rifle it, or visa versa.
The Steeler offensive line sipped undiscreetly yesterday also, aloowing
tacklers to hit the running backs before the plays had too much of a
chance to develop.
Special teams was a bright spot, though. Gary Anderson kicked his 56th
straight field goal of 35 yards or less, plus buried the ball to the
deep part of the end zone on all but one kick-off. Anderson is kicking
the ball much deeper this year on kickoffs than he was last year.
Ernie Mills first career TD was a gift from New England punter Brian
Wagner. One of Wagners blockers moved back on the kick from the end
zone and the ball hit another Patriot's back and bounced right into
Mills' hands for the TD.
I'll put the stats from the game in here tomorrow.
JaKe
|
35.207 | 2-1 and not proud of it | CELTIK::JACOB | ItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!! | Wed Sep 18 1991 00:54 | 59 |
|
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
New England 0 6 0 0 6
STEELERS 3 3 0 14 20
STEELERS--FG Anderson 49 yd
Patriots--FG Staurovsky 33 yd
Patriots--FG Staurovsky 28 yd
STEELERS--FG Anderson 32 yd
STEELERS--E.Green 32 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--E.Mills 0yd punt return(Anderson PAT)
Attendance--53,703
TEAM STATS:
Patriots STEELERS
12 First Downs 16
29-82 Rushes-Yards 21-43
92 Passing Yards 247
11-25-2 Compl-Att-Int 22-29-0
0 Return Yards 100
3-22 Sacked-Yards Lost 1-15
6-37 Punts 4-36
0-0 Fumbles-Lost 3-2
8-50 Penalties-Yards 7-60
33:06 TimeOfPossession 26:54
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Patriots: Russell 16-47, Allen 3-17, Stephens 6-11, Hunter 3-6, Hodson
1-1
STEELERS: Foster 14-32, Hoge 6-13, Brister 1-(-1)
PASSING:
Patriots: Hodson 11-24-2 114yds, Fryar 0-1-0 0yds
STEELERS: Brister 22-29-0-262
RECEIVING:
Patriots: Fryar 5-62, Cook 3-21, Russell 1-18, Stephens 1-10, Hunter
1-3
STEELERS: Lipps 7-86, E.Green 4-63, Hoge 4-28, Stone 3-31, Foster 2-19,
W.Williams 1-29, Mularkey 1-6.
STEELER NOTES:
Louis Lipps passed Lynn Swann on the all time STEELER receiving list
and moved into second place behind John Stallworth. Lipps had 7
catches for 86 yards, giving him 5,476 career receiving yards.
Swann played 9 seasons, Lipps is 3 games into his 8th season.
HB Leroy Thompson and Defensive Lineman were on the inactive list for
the game. Thompson has a hamstring injury while Richardson has a knee
problem.
JaKe
|
35.208 | Bad News | CELTIK::JACOB | ItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!! | Wed Sep 18 1991 18:02 | 20 |
| It was reported today the OL Brian Blankenship has been advised by
doctors to retire from football. Blankenship suffered a neck injury
Sunday vs. the Pats and after being seen by team and other physicians,
was diagnosed as having a problem between the third and fourth
vertebrae that, if stressed by further play, could result in
blankenship's paralysis.
Blankenship's agent released the prognosis but Blankenship said he
wants to see another specialist or 2 before making any decisions.
In related news, the Steeler luck with first round picks just goes on
and on. Tom Ricketts, who was the Steelers second pick in the first
round the year they got Tim "perpetually injured" Worley has been
listed as 8th on the Steelers depth chart as far as OL go. When
Blankenship went down Sunday, Chuck Noll chose to substitute Terry Long
for Blankenship instead of Ricketts, who has been described by Steeler
coaches as disappointing, very disappointing.
JaKe
|
35.209 | I found this funny | CELTIK::JACOB | ItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!! | Wed Sep 18 1991 22:18 | 102 |
| GOOD BOOS NOTHING BUT PASSION WITH A PUNCH
by
Gene Collier
reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Press 9-17-91
A somewhat unusual element has turned up in the otherwise common fallout of the
first two Steelers home games, it being this sudden consignment to the media on
the matter of appropriate vs. inappropriate crowd response.
Like BOOING is an applied science, right???
Two consecutive home crowds, which are largely the same throbbing mass, have
been ripped via typical media truculence on two counts of inappropriate
response, the first for apparently cheering an injury to quarterback Bubby
Brister and the second for booing Brister during a performance that would wind
up looking favorable statistically.
Prison terms aren't likely.
The first count can't be proven and the second assumes that those booing are
doing so in spite of the up-to-the-minute statistical printouts provided
constantly to the 59,000 seats.
Although the medias position on that first count is that you have to be some
form of rodentia to purposely cheer an injury, you may only have to be a half
rodentia with half a bag on. Refreshing beverages with alcoholic content are
sold at these meetings, remember, many in cups big enough to qualify as an
aquarium. We needn't be stunned when confronted with evidence of a diminished
understanding of the humanities.
But the second count is actually troubling. It has been suggested that many
boo out of ignorance. It has been suggested that lack of effort is the only
rational impetus for booing. It has been suggested that booing is stupid,
inasmuch as it can detract from a performance the crowd is there to support.
BOOING, obviously, is getting way too much analysis!!
BOOING is an inalienable right of the paying customer. It is not vulgar. It
is merely the opposite of cheering. It is simply a way for an audience to tell
the performer that right here, right now, they are not happy. BOOING is one of
the great sounds of sport, so demonstratively superior to the murmur and moan
of golf and the squeal and gasp of tennis that comparison insults the booer.
A great boo, a giant, caustic, Philadelphia-quality boo actually begins with a
guttural "m" sound and explodes out of it. "mmmBOOOOOO." It's the kind
Mike Schmidt, Hall of Famer to be, used to get in the playoffs. Not out of
ignorance, not out of nonsupport, out of passion. Right there, right then,
they were very unhappy with him. That's all it meant. He may as well know it,
don't you think??
As for the support angle, the first two Three Rivers Stadium crowds supported
the club with something in the neighborhood of $2 million per game in ticket,
parking, and concession prices. I think that fulfills their obligation. The
people on the sofas might find their comportment objectionable, might find the
studio audience a little different than the one on "The Price Is Right". But
you know, you get into "The Price Is Right" for free.
"How about this lovely four-poster bed? OOOOOOH, AAAAAAH!!"
"How about this lovely 2-yard run by Merrill Hoge?? BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!"
I don't think it's so complicated. I had thought of setting up the media
bureau of boo control, through which you can request a boo application for a
boo license, and I was wrestling with the idea of a possible seven-day boo
waiting period, but I figured I'd just give you this list instead.
If, to you, to boo or not to boo is really a question at Steelers games, you
might want to consult these very general guidelines. The rest of you may
proceed on instinct.
Bubby hurt: Don't boo
You paid for tickets, but got complimentary parking: Boo quietly.
Hoge runs wide: BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 1 inside opponents 40: BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 2 inside the opponents 40: BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 3 inside the opponents 40: Grumble to yourself
Gary Anderson: DON'T BOO
you never played the game: Boo infrequently
You played in high school: Don't boo in the first 3 quarters
You played in college: Boo after halftime
You played Div. I-A college ball: Boo anytime after the 1st quarter
You played pro ball: BOO anytime
You coached pro ball: Boo the warm-ups
You played AND coached pro ball: Boo your wife
Your wife played pro ball: DON'T BOO
Bubby overthrows: Boo
Bubby underthrows: Boo
Bubby calls time: Boo
Bubby completes an 8-yard pass on third and 9: Boo
Bubby is sacked: Boo
Bubby is hurried: Boo
Bubby fumbles snap: Boo
Barry Foster is replaced: Boo
Joe Walton wears baseball cap backwards: Boo
You are tailgating: Don't boo
You are listening to Chuck Noll's pregame show while tailgating: Boo
Halftime shoe: Don't boo
Pre-game presentation of pingpong table-sized check to worthy charity:Don't boo
I'll bet you knew that last one.
|
35.210 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Sep 20 1991 16:35 | 10 |
|
re: .209
Too funny!! I always thought the Pittsburgh Press sports writers
were better than what I've read in different parts of the country, and
this piece is another gem.
bill..g.
|
35.211 | Gene Collier and Bob Smizik are two of the best | CELTIK::JACOB | ItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!! | Fri Sep 20 1991 19:44 | 13 |
| re-.1
I agree with ya on the quality of sportswriters in Pittsburgh. Now I
gotta figure out how to get the wife to keep the ~30 newspapers laying
around cause I'm headed for Colorado Sunday and won't be back in
Pittsburgh until Oct. 19th. I want to look thru the papers when I gets
back to see if there are any other good gems available. She's a clean
freak and pitches the newspaper as soon as I lay it down. Sure is tough
reading thru coffee grounds and other garbage if I forget to lack it away!!
(8^)*
|
35.212 | Put that McDonnell Douglas guy in! | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll find myself as I go home | Mon Sep 23 1991 10:18 | 1 |
|
|
35.213 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Me&MySolarPanelInColoradoSprings | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:27 | 9 |
| Anybody who saw the game able to give a summary in here. I'm not going
to be able to enter the stats so could somebody else take care of it
for me????
Thanks
JaKe
|
35.214 | Steelers looked great early but ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Rumblin', bumblin', stumblin' ... | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:42 | 30 |
| Dan'l Medvid and I watched the Eagles-Steelers game together at a
sports bar in Charlotte. The Steelers got off to a great start with
scoring drives on their first two possessions. They certainly
looked prepared and focused. Eric Green was a one-man wrecking crew.
He was open short, open medium, and open long.
The Eagles did score on a long drive of their own in between the
Steelers two scores so they were in position to keep pushing for the
lead. Then Roy Green entered the game and that was it. The
Eagles picked him up off the waiver wire last week to replace Calvin
Williams (shoulder) and the two old vets, McMahon and Green, looked
like they had been playing together for years. Green caught 6 for
114 yards.
Meanwhile, the Eagles got 2 FG's in the 2nd quarter and the defense
finally cooled the Steelers' offense. Halftime was 14-13.
Second half was a no contest. Steelers offense was gone which played
right into the Eagles' hands. The defensive line could tee off and
Brister was on the run the entire half. He didn't handle the
pressure very well but at least he didn't take the beating Aikman
took lasted week. Eagles' offense scored 10 boring points and it
was over, 24-13.
The Steelers definitely looked great in the first quarter and then
they slid pretty quickly after that. Losing Rod Woodson with a neck
sprain was a big blow. Didn't lose any ground, though, because the
entire AFC Central took the collar yesterday.
Bob Hunt
|
35.215 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:00 | 10 |
| First downs were 20-11, Phil. Penalties were virtually non-existent.
Philly had the ball for almost 40 minutes. Rushing was Philly 36/95,
with Sherman being 20/67. Sherman outrushed Pittsburgh, who was 17/66,
with Foster being 9/52. Brister was 12/25 for 190, 2 TDs, 1 int and
was sacked 3/30. Green was 8/58, Hoge was 4/32. McMahon was 22/31,
286 yards, 1 Int, 0 TDs and sacked 1/7. Green was 6/114, Barnett 6/42,
Byars 4/81, Sherman 4/27 and Jackson 2/22. Philly had 279 total yds,
Pitt had 160.
John
|
35.216 | Offense was tough for 15 minutes | SHALOT::HUNT | Rumblin', bumblin', stumblin' ... | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:11 | 12 |
| � Philly had 279 total yds, Pitt had 160.
This is perhaps the most telling statistic. The Steelers' two first
quarter touchdown drives were both pretty long ... I believe the
Steelers had close to 150 yards of offense in the first quarter.
Eric Green was already over the 100 yard mark in reception yardage at
that point.
And just 10 net yards (including losses from Brister's 3 sacks) the
rest of the way.
Bob Hunt
|
35.217 | Cleveland cut Roy Green. Great personnel move there. | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll find myself as I go home | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:14 | 34 |
| All kidding aside about replacing Brister with Ed McMahon, I just have
to believe that the Steelers aren't coached well...and it's not just
Joe Walton.
Yesterday's offense was like night and day between the two halves. The
Steelers moved the ball very well in the first half and took a lead
into the locker room. Then they just stalled in the second half. I
don't recall Brister completing a pass to a WR all game. How can you
not exploit the fact that the Philly D adjusted to Big Green in the
second half? Receivers had to be open somewhere? The Eagle pass rush
was not as rough as it was on Dallas, but Brister got way too flustered
and left his pocket prematurely.
On defense, the theme for this season seems to be jumping offside on
third down. Unbelievable! That's just bad coaching and lack of mental
discipline. They did get ripped off a couple times by a no replay
reversal on bad official calls (a one foot inbounds catch that wasn't
even reviewed, and a fumble on 3rd and goal that was given back to the
Eagles), but those are no excuses for giving up the points. Good teams
overcome bad calls.
The only coaching bright spot up until yesterday was special teams, but
after losing Woodson, that too looked a bit sour.
Jerry Olsavsky continues to impress with heady plays and wreckless
abandon, but I did notice his size tends to get him knocked on his butt
a lot during misdirection plays.
Chuck Noll is still one of the greatest coaches in the game, but I
gotta believe he needs to chew some duppa on his staff. The Steelers
don't have a great team, but they can certainly play better than
yesterday's exhibition.
--dan'l
|
35.218 | Richardson down for a while | CELTIK::JACOB | Me&MySolarPanelInColoradoSprings | Tue Sep 24 1991 16:05 | 6 |
| The Steelers first round draftee this year, Huey Richardson, was to
undergo arthroscopic knee surgery yesterday in Atlanta.
JaKe
|
35.219 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Wed Sep 25 1991 11:00 | 15 |
|
I thought the turning point of the game was the sack of Brister by
Clyde Simmons. That caused the STeelers to keep Eric Green and block,
taking away what was their only offensive weapon. The Steelers
completed no passes to their WR.
As far as the bad calls go, I thought the fuble near the goal line was
debatable, but the review couldn't tell when the knee hit the ground.
Whatever the zebras called couldn't have been reversed. The call that
stuck in my craw was the non call on Brister for intentional grounding.
I think it was in the second quarter when three Eagles were on top of
him and he just threw the ball and covered up. Nice job, Bubby.
Dennis
|
35.220 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Me&MySolarPanelInColoradoSprings | Wed Sep 25 1991 11:45 | 8 |
| The Steelers put QB Rick Strom on the roster to fill the slot left
vacant when they put Huey Richardson(knee problem) on Injured reserve.
Greg Lloyd signed a contract extension yesterday, also.
JaKe
|
35.221 | From US)less)A Today | CELTIK::JACOB | Flush the John, DTN Unknown | Wed Sep 25 1991 16:23 | 52 |
| STEELER STATS (abbreviated)
Record= 2-2
Passing:
att comp yds td int rating
Brister 104 62 775 4 4 79.6
O'Donnell 4 1 89 1 0 118.8
Opponents 141 84 966 8 6 81.5
Receiving:
# Yds Avg Long TD
EricGreen 17 282 16.6 49 2
Hoge 14 101 7.2 16 1
Lipps 11 129 11.7 24 0
Stone 7 155 22.1 89* 1
Foster 5 667 13.4 31 0
Opponents 84 966 11.5 53 8
Rushing
Att Yds Avg Long Td
Foster 49 283 5.8 56* 1
Hoge 36 101 2.8 11 1
(Rest of Steeler rushing not listed in US(less)A Today)
Opponent 128 466 4.2 33 2
Interceptions:
Hinkle, 1-57yds, Everett 1-27 yds, Griffin 1-22 yds. 3 others not listed in
US(less)A Today
Sacks:
Lloyd 3, J.Williams 2, Willis 2, Evans 1, Jones 1.
Opponents=8
Kicking:
PAT/Att FG/Att Long FG Points
Anderson 10/10 8/9 49 34
Punting:
# Yds Long Avg TB BLK
Stryzinski 19 746 50 39.3 1 0
Fumbles:
Brister 1, Foster 2, E.Green 2, Hoge 2, Woodson 1
JaKe
|
35.222 | | CELTIK::JACOB | MummifiedManInAustriaIsJimmyHoffa | Fri Sep 27 1991 11:32 | 9 |
| Steeler RB TimWorley, on Injured reserve for abscence of brain...er...I
Mean.. a knee injury, was arrested for driving under the influence late
Wednesday.
$Set mode/voice=Mr. Rogers
Hey Tim, can you say "unemployment line"?????
JaKe
|
35.223 | whither steelhead club? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Oct 01 1991 18:01 | 6 |
| Yo Dan'l
Anyword on the Steelers Club? They have a chance at indy nexted week and
inquiring minds want to know.
TTom
|
35.224 | Charlotte Steelers | SHALOT::MEDVID | Talk slowly; I'm hard of thinking | Tue Oct 01 1991 18:22 | 10 |
| Other than the Scoreboard, you can see the Steelers in Charlotte at:
- Gold Players Sports Bar & Grill (4908 Central Ave.)
- The Graduate (Independence)
The Steelers Club meets at the Gold Players Bar.
See you there, maybe, huh?
|
35.225 | thanks, see ya there | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Oct 01 1991 19:22 | 5 |
| Yeah, don't be surprised if a couple of stragglers show up for the Colts
game. Hell, if the Burghers win, and if we're invited back, it could
become a regular event.
TTom
|
35.226 | National Exposure of Bubby's Mediocrity | SHALOT::MEDVID | Talk slowly; I'm hard of thinking | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:26 | 10 |
| TTom,
the game is this Sunday at 7:00. Don't know what kind of crowd we'll
have since it's available on cable. In fact, the next two games are on
national TV because the Steelers play the Giants on Monday night the
following week. Dread.
Send me mail toward the end of the week if'n yer plannin' on goin'.
--dan'l
|
35.227 | | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:37 | 7 |
| --dan'l
Are you sure it's 7, I thought it was at eight, EST. That's the normal
TNT Sunday night time.
JaKe
|
35.228 | What time is kickoff? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Talk slowly; I'm hard of thinking | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:19 | 8 |
| Well, I've got two times according to two sources:
- SI NFL Preview issue has the game listed at 7:00
- Steelers Digest has the game listed at 8:00
Who can confirm?
|
35.229 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:21 | 5 |
| My schedule card lists this as a TNT game Sunday game. Those are at 8pm.
I will try to cofirm a little more firmly tomorrow....
'Saw
|
35.230 | | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:54 | 4 |
| US(eless)A Today lists the game as 8pm est.
JaKe
|
35.231 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:55 | 6 |
|
Both guides are correct. The SI guide lists the games at local time,
which for Indy is Central. The game will be at 8 pm Eastern time.
Dennis
|
35.232 | At their best they're average | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:24 | 10 |
| The Steelers struggled early against the winless Colts and then came on
in the second half to win 21-3. Not very impressive...special teams,
linebackers, Barry Foster (even though he fumbled at the goal line),
and Joe not picking his nose once on national TV were the only bright
spots.
The scarey thing is, one good shot on Warren Moon and Pittsburgh might
win the AFC Central.
--dan'l
|
35.233 | | CELTIK::JACOB | kweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbwe | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:35 | 10 |
| The Steelers couldn't do sh!t in the first half, even with Brister
going 6-9, 80+ yards, but two of those 3 misses were completed to Colts
defenders.
Brister did have a good second half, hitting on 8 of 8 for 100+ yards,
finishing up 14-17, with 180+ yards, and 2 TD's. One on a perfect pass
to Eric Green, and the second on a pass and run play to Barry Foster.
JaKe
|
35.234 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:25 | 14 |
|
What is really scary is that the Steeler's "rolled" it up
bigtime on a WFL team. I mean, the Colts are nothing better than
a expansion team right now and the Steeler's still had a hard time.
Next week will be a real test...a playoff team! I'm still not
impressed in the least. If they can manage to beat the Giants, maybe
there is some hope. The only real ray of hope is that the Steelers
may well have the best TE in the NFL. If Green were playing for a
team that threw him the ball, he'd already have the "all-world" tag.
bill..g.
|
35.235 | Central could get swept this week but the Benges may win | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:59 | 10 |
| THe Giants are attempting to get over .500 and just pitt stands in
there way, not to mention that there 3 games out of first with wash
playing against clevland at home...This is a must win for NY seeing
that wash will no doubt be 7-0. Sorry pitt.. Houston on the other
hand gets to play the Jets...Of course if they can lose to NE they
could lose to anybody...Look for the Steelters/Oilers/Browns to all
lose the the DAMN Bengals get there first win against my Boys...Boo
I wish cinncy had won this week...I hate seeing them winless going
into dallas...
|
35.236 | | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Mon Oct 07 1991 15:02 | 8 |
| The Steelers, most likely, will get beat this week when they play the
Gnats, but I don't think Cincy will beat Dallass. My question is how
long will the Cincy Mgmt go before doing the "Ron Meyers" dance on
Wicky-Wacky-Wyches forehaid????
JaKe
|
35.237 | I gots to know | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Mon Oct 07 1991 16:11 | 7 |
| Could somebody Pulease enter the team and individual stats from lasted
nights Steeler-Dolt game.
Mucho appreciation in advanco
JaKe
|
35.238 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Oct 07 1991 18:09 | 7 |
| I think all the AFC central will lose next week. The only team that
stands a chance at winning is the oilers. the jets are playing good
ball, and if they don't choke in the 4th, they might win it.
A 8-8 season will win this division, whomever it might be.
Tim
|
35.239 | | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Tue Oct 08 1991 14:45 | 13 |
| AT what point did Brister get hurt Sunday??
I couldn't hear the TNT announcers 'cause of the noise in the bar but
I thought it uncharacteristic of Noll to take Brister out and put
O'donnell in whilst the Steelers had a 21-3 lead. Noll almost NEVER
relieves a QB unless there is a lead/deficit of 100 points or more.
Then today, I read in USelessA Today that Brister is listed as probable
for the Monday night Gnats game, with an injured knee.
JaKe
|
35.240 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Oct 08 1991 19:34 | 4 |
| The Stellers will be no different of a team. o'donnell will choke
under the pass ruch of jints just the same as BB.
Tim
|
35.241 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Wed Oct 09 1991 15:46 | 8 |
| USelessA TODAY reports that an MRI scan yesterday revealed that Brister
sprained ligaments in his left knee in the Dolts game.
Brister is now listed as questionable for the Gnats game Monday night.
Neil O'Donnell will start if Brister is unable to go.
JaKe
|
35.242 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Oct 09 1991 17:30 | 19 |
|
re: brister out
Maybe this could be a blessing in disguise?? Why can't the
Steeler's be on the other side of the coin when a player off the bench
comes in to play the game of his life? Why is it that they are always
victimized by others doing the same thing?
For me, I hope O'Donnell gets the start. I think the Steeler's
have wasted enough time with Bubby. If O'Donnell plays well, maybe
we'll see a return to the days of Hanratty-Gilliam-Bradshaw when
all three were constantly jerked in and out of games if they didn't
produce.
Maybe a change of scenery will do the Steeler's some good.
bill..g.
|
35.243 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Wed Oct 09 1991 18:09 | 36 |
| >> Maybe this could be a blessing in disguise?? Why can't the
>>Steeler's be on the other side of the coin when a player off the bench
>>comes in to play the game of his life? Why is it that they are always
>>victimized by others doing the same thing?
I agree, see one Cody #$%&@$% Carlson lasted year in the final game of
the year.
>>have wasted enough time with Bubby. If O'Donnell plays well, maybe
>>we'll see a return to the days of Hanratty-Gilliam-Bradshaw when
>>all three were constantly jerked in and out of games if they didn't
>>produce.
I dunno if that would be too good of a thing to happen. In the early
Emperor Noll days, he jumped ship on QB's at the drop of a hat, and had
little success with it. One thing that I feel when it comes to a team
and QB, consistency. If a team is continually jumping from one QB to
another, I can't see where they can do ANY good whatsoever. Unless
both QB's ALWAYS get the same amount of practice time, AND game playing
time. A qb can p[ractice all they want, but unonce they get into the
game and face REAL defenses, it don't mean sh!t!!
Brister isn't the best QB in the league, by the same token, he isn't
the worst either. He's a known quantity. Tons of potential, but only
mediocre results. Part of this blame has to go on the "O" line.
I don't recall Brister ever having much time to throw when the Steelers
play a decent defense. When he has time, like he did SUnday .vs. the
Colts, he had a good day, though, mistakes on part of the offense left
them trailing at the half.
I'd like to see O'Donnell play just to see if what he showed in
pre-season is real or not.
JaKE
|
35.244 | O'Donnell should win starting spot after this | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 02:03 | 24 |
| Well, about 15 hours ago I wrote in the Browns note that good teams
overcome poor officiating. The Steelers proved they were a good team
during MNF last night. For those of you who went to bed or had the
Pittsburgh offense lull you to sleep, you missed a great finish.
Brister was benched in the third quarter and Neil O'Donnell (yes, it's
time to start using his proper name [even though Gifford called him
O'Donald once]) brought the Steelers back to tie the game at 20-20 with
a minute left. Matt Bahr kicked the game winning field goal with nine
seconds in the game.
One can only wonder what the outcome would have been if:
- The officials would have thrown a flag on the obvious pass
interference on Hoge during the second quarter. Instead, the
ball was intercepted and the Giants picked up a field goal.
- O'Donnell had played the entire game.
The Steelers didn't win, but to come rouring back like that against a
solid opponent tells me that they've got a better team than I had given
them credit for.
--dan'l
|
35.245 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Tue Oct 15 1991 09:05 | 29 |
| I can only believe that the Steelers resurgence was a case of utterly
poor coaching on the Giants part. The Steelers executed VERY well, and
it's probably no coincicdence all of the major pass plays were made by
the receiver being covered by Gary Reasons.
Parcells would NEVER have let that comeback happen. Whenever his team
was ahead he was always riding them, cautioning them against celebrating
before the final gun. Handley and Groh (Tweedledee and Tweedledum)
have no such control.
This was a classic case of a team sitting on a lead and trying to ease
on into the lockerroom with a W. How important now looms the Megget
30 yard TD run.
Personally, I'm very glad Pittsburgh pushed it, and made a game out of
it. Maybe it will send a wakeup call to the Giants coaching staff (average
IQ about 5 degrees below room temp).
This Giants team reminded me of the Giants teams of the late 70s early
80s -- watching a sieve like prevent defense trying to prevent the
inevitable....
I'd like to be in Pittsburgh this week to see what happens with the QB
situation.....
'Saw
|
35.246 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 15 1991 09:25 | 3 |
| WOW! I went to bed about 11:45. The Steelers had no chance.
Obviously JoJ has been right all these years. Joe Walton IS a genius!
Denny
|
35.247 | Sure wish we'd have some inter-divisional games allready | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Rockin' in the Free World | Tue Oct 15 1991 10:32 | 15 |
|
Shoe's on the other foot now, Dan'l. If you consider overcoming
poor officiating LOOSING, then I guess that's your opinion.
The Browns had a similiar second half comeback against the
Giants (at the Giants), so I see a trend with this years Giants team.
This Giants team is not playing anywhere near the level they were
playing at last year, so I don't consider a close-but-no-cigar
performance at home against them as an indication of anything.
The bottom line is the Steelers are 3-3, 2 games back of the Oilers.
At least Noll finally woke up and smelled the fresh brewed coffee about
Bubby.
/Jeff
|
35.248 | May Brister Ride the Bench, Eternally | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:02 | 19 |
| I, for one, was happy to see Brister get some bench splinters in his
butt in the second half.
Sheez, I wish I were back in the 'Burgh this week to witness the
outcries on Myron Cope's radio show for Brister to get his walking
papers.
'Saw, I partially agree with ya on the Gnats letting up, BUT, you have
to give O'Donnell credit. Almost every pass he threw was right on the
money, and thrown with authority. Something we Pittsburghers haven't
seen out of Brister very often. With Brister in the same situations
that O'Donnell was in, the Steelers would have probably just been
intercepted 2 or 3 times.
Does anybody have the stats on the game(especially Brister's and
O'Donnell's)??????????????Could somebody post them here, PUULLLEEASE!!
JaKe
|
35.249 | Personally I think it was the QB out-of-the-pocket option | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | What a WONDERFUL honeymoon | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:04 | 31 |
| re:244
I watched that play (the pass interference non-call) and all the
replays. I agreed with the call, and there were several points that
the game anouncers ignored.
- Once the QB leaves the pocket, the defender can legally disrupt
the pass route, as long as the pass is not in the air. This rule
is an outgrowth of the QB-rollout pass-run-option play.
Otherwise the defender has no way of protecting himself from the
reciever blocking on the run option.
Brister was definitly out of the pocket on this play.
- It looked like the Saftey was in a possition to make the int
anyway. The refs may have decided the pass was not catchable for
that reason.
- A (very weak) case could be made for Offensive pass interference.
After all, the Steeler reciever did collide with a nearly
stationary Giant defender.
Note: This play was reviewed TWICE by instant replay. (The Steelers
took a timeout to give every opportunity.) There must have been some
rule allowing it that the announcers were not aware of.
Commander Scott
P.S. The Giants should have blown the game open in the 1st half and
didn't. Then there wouldn't have been a comeback. The Steelers managed
only 1 first down in the 1st half, yet the Giants could only manage a
13-0 lead.
|
35.250 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:12 | 35 |
|
>> - Once the QB leaves the pocket, the defender can legally disrupt
>> the pass route, as long as the pass is not in the air. This rule
>> is an outgrowth of the QB-rollout pass-run-option play.
>> Otherwise the defender has no way of protecting himself from the
>> reciever blocking on the run option.
>> Brister was definitly out of the pocket on this play.
Granted, Brister may have been out of the pocket, BUT, Hoge was slammed
with the ball in the air, not while Brister was on the move.
>> - It looked like the Saftey was in a possition to make the int
>> anyway. The refs may have decided the pass was not catchable for
>> that reason.
Hoge would have been in position to break up the interception had he
not been knocked down.
>> - A (very weak) case could be made for Offensive pass interference.
>> After all, the Steeler reciever did collide with a nearly
>> stationary Giant defender.
Oh please stop, this is one of the funniest things I've read all
morning. The defender was about as "nearly stationary" as the people
in the fast lane on I-495 are "nearly stationary" every morning(at
75+mph). Hoge was interfered with, CLEARLY, and the officials on the
field BLEW the call. But that one call wasn't the problem with the
Steelers losing, it was the rancid play of the offense in the first
half.
BTW, as far as I know, there are no provisions for CALLING a penalty
from the replay booth.
JaKe
|
35.251 | Neil! Neil! Neil! | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:18 | 14 |
| All your reasons are null, I belive, Scott, because the ball was in the
air when Hoge was hit. The receiver must be given a chance to catch
the ball.
As far as the "shoe being on the other foot," what I was pointing out
was that the Browns get blown out and Whitehair (et. al.) are in here
blowing steam about how they were jobbed by the refs. But a good team
overcomes bad calls. The Steelers overcame that call; the Browns never
overcame the officials. By my reasoning, Steelers are good, Browns are
not.
Good teams do lose. Bad teams lose a lot.
--dan'l
|
35.252 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:28 | 20 |
| --dan'l, I ain't trying to dispute anything you're saying, BUT, I ,
personally, am certainly not ready to call the Steelers a "GOOD TEAM",
after only 20 minutes of brilliance lasted night. Sure, they looked
GREAT in the comeback, but I need another 2 or 3 wins in a row to be
able to hang the "GOOD" label on them.
I do, however, think that O'Donnell should be given a start nexted
week, .vs. the Seattle ocean pigeons, but knowing Noll's ways, Brister
will probably be back in there, unfortunately.
IMHO, O'Donnell didn't show the nervous feet that Brister has never
gotten rid of. He hung in the pocket, moved up when he had to, and his
scramble to the Giants 5 set up the 2nd Steeler TD.
My prediction: Brister will be bench warming regularly within the next
year to year and a half. O'Donnell, barring injury, will get to show
his stuff from a starting position.
JaKe
|
35.253 | Big difference in level of competition.. wait and see | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Rockin' in the Free World | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:42 | 14 |
|
There is a LOAD of difference between the Redskins and the Giants.
If you can't see that Dan'l then then you are blind. The Steelers and
the Browns both lost to the Giants by 3 points. The Browns, however,
lost in Giants stadium, not at home. I don't think any comparison can
be made between the two teams until they square off against each other.
The Steelers are not bad, however, I don't consider the Browns to be
bad either. I consider both teams to be average, and I think they'll
both finish about .500 this year. Too bad neither is good enough to
take Houston outta the top spot. A perfect 0-fer record is a terrible
thing to waste.
/Jeff
|
35.254 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:46 | 30 |
| As for as O'Donnell, he wasn't facing much of a pass rush. And the run
was working because of the STOOOPPPPPIIIIIDDDDD Prevent Defense.
I do not understand why the Groh (Giants Def Coord) did not just go
with what had been working. Instead of rushing two guys and an LB,
why not continue with the pressure on the QB. Instead, he gave Pittsburgh
TIME to find those receivers, most often in one on one coverage with
Reasons.
As to the Interference call, yeah, could've been. It's not a reviewable
call, btw. The ball seemed awfully far away, but then again, the
receiver never got there ;^)
The Giants:
Yes, this team is NOT the same team from last year, in terms of intensity.
The Giants have never been a "blow you out" team, but this year instead
of edging the others, the others have been edging them.
I don't know if Handley is capable of coaching this team, only time will
tell. I feel it's a coach's job to motivate, and he doesn't (probably
because he's about as dynamic as a wet dishrag) so we differ substantially
on that view.
I see this game as a win, but NOT a victory.....
'Saw
|
35.255 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:33 | 41 |
|
First of all, the Steelers stink. Yes, I am a fan of the Steeler's
but they did stink for 3/4 of the game.
Secondly, I was glad, rather elated that O'Donnell was finally
given a chance. Bubby's been around for 4 years now and really hasn't
done much to improve. I've gotta ask, how long do we have to wait for
him to get it in gear? O'Donnell deserves a shot and he got a good
shot last night.
Yes, I felt the Giants let up a little, but the comment about
O'Donnell not getting any pass rush is way out of line. Taylor was
blitzing on almost every down and I curious as to why our announcers
weren't trying to develop that point more because on Pittsburgh's
first scoring drive, they let LT come and just ran inside of him.
If you can blame anyone on the Giants, you don't have to look much
further than LT. He played a great game, but in the 4th, he gambled
way to much and the Steeler's finally ran to him.
I've also got to wonder why it took almost 3 whole quarters before
they got the ball to Green? Here's one of the best TE's in the league
and they don't throw to him at all for nearly 3 quarters. When they
do throw to him, he is like a Mack truck and ends up catching a TD to
tie the game.
In general, Bubby panics way to much in the pocket and gives up
to soon. On the other hand, O'Donnell stood in there longer which
gave his receivers some more time to get open and he delivered the
ball with a lot of accuracy. The TD to Lipps was a perfect throw as
was the throw to Green. The throw to Green spilt two defenders and
the throw to Lipps was placed perfectly over the reach of the defender.
All this isn't saying that O'Donnell is the man now because of
one quarter of heroics, but after 4 years of watching Bubby bumble
around, I'm ready to give this kid a chance to see what he can do.
We already know what Bubby can('t) do, so let's see what this kid
can do.
bill..g.
|
35.256 | NY-Pitt stats | BSS::JCOTANCH | Seachickens & Blue Jays are Chokers! | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:37 | 54 |
| NY Giants 7 6 7 3 - 23
Pittsburgh 0 0 3 17 - 20
NY Pit
First downs 17 20
Rushing 10 9
Passing 7 11
Penalty 0 0
3rd-down eff. 9-17 2-10
4th-down eff. 0-0 0-0
Total yds. 311 377
Total plays 65 57
Net rushing yds. 197 148
Rushes 38 18
Avg per rush 5.2 8.2
Net passing yds. 114 229
Completed-Att. 14-25 17-37
Yards-pass-play 4.2 5.9
Sacked-yds lost 2-2 2-20
Punts-avg. 6-41 6-41
Return yards 85 144
Punts-returns 0-0 4-29
Kickoffs-returns 4-68 6-115
Ints. 1-17 0-0
Penalties-yds. 1-10 9-65
Fumbles-lost 0-0 2-0
Time of poss. 36:17 23:43
Individual Stats
Rushing:
NY - Hampton 25-96, Hostetler 6-48, Meggett 3-44, Carthon 2-7, Tillmsn 2-2
Pitt - Hoge 8-73, Foster 7-60, O'Donnell 2-13, Brister 1-2
Passing:
NY - Hostetler 14-25-0-116
Pitt - Brister 6-16-1-97, O'Donnell 11-21-0-152
Receiving:
NY - Meggett 4-34, Carthon 3-15, Turner 2-21, Cross 2-20, McCaffrey 2-20,
Ingram 1-6
Pitt - Lips 5-64, Green 4-58, Hoge 3-18, Stone 2-78, Graham 1-15,
Thompson 1-9, Mularkey 1-7
Interceptions:
NY - Collins
Pitt - None
Missed FG's:
NY - None
Pitt - None
|
35.257 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:46 | 7 |
| re.256
Thanks, Joe
JaKe
|
35.258 | Green>>Jackson | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Inthehotredlightofablack&white ROSESGROW | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:51 | 9 |
|
Hey Jeff, what's the world of difference between the Giants and the Skins?
Skins have had a cakewalk of schedule so far. Lions without Sanders, Eagles
with no-QB and gift wrapped and hand delievered win from the Vitalsis man
down in ERVINE...Bears have no o and the rest of the teams are stumble
bums. Wait two weeks you'll see when the STREAK reaches 7.....
mike
|
35.259 | Now that I've calmed down... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:36 | 19 |
| Yeah, OK, I need to apologize to Jeff and JaKe. I just got caught up
in the Steelers looking good for a quarter. One game does not a good
team make, let alone one quarter. (At the same time, calling the
Steelers "good" was a relative comparison to the Browns, not to the
rest of the NFL.)
I fall back on my old prediction that both the Browns and Steelers will
finish at .500 this year. And what was Hal's prediction?
But I gotta believe that O'Donnell is the Steelers' future. I backed
Bubby for so long while others were maligning him. I argued in his
favor for four years. And even during the preseason when Steelers fans
were yelling, "Bench Brister and start Doug MacDoogel," I still claimed
Brister was the man. All that changed over the last few games and
culminated last night. Brister can't move the offense. O'Donnell can.
O'Donnell will have his share of bad games and rocky starts, but I say
hand him the reins come Wednesday's practice.
--dan'l
|
35.260 | FIX! | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:07 | 1 |
| Giants let up so Pittsburgh could beat the spread!
|
35.261 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:14 | 20 |
|
I'm also a little surprised that no one mentioned the celebration
penalty that cost the Steeler's 5 yards on the kickoff which was
subsequently kicked out of bounds, thus giving the Giants the ball
at the 40. That was huge and I hope Eric Green has learned a lesson
though his celebration dance..
I will say this about the Giants and that is if last night was
any indication of the Giants play then they should be glad that they
have a backup. Hostetler (sp) was on the run all night and I believe
he ran for 4 firstdowns including the one that set up the winning
field goal. He took a pretty good pounding, but the fact that he
had to run so much doesn't say a whole lot for the offensive line.
Hostetler is a gutty guy, but if has to keep running to keep the
offense moving, Simms entrance might not be to far off.
bill..g.
|
35.262 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:16 | 28 |
| If you look back at the prevent that NY plays, they're usually rushing
two down lineman, and an LB, who 99% of the time happens to be LT.
O'Donnell didn't have as much pressure late, as Brister did early, because
the damn Giants were trying to "prevent" exactly what happened.
LT was playing pass. The entire Giants defense was playing pass. Why?
Because that's the way Twiddledum Groh wanted it. Also, the one slight
defense you have against LT is to run at him, which Pittsburgh did well.
Green wasn't open much early on because the Giants were covering him
with people who are good at that (CBs) and not the LB on the Giants who's
best against the run (Reasons).
Bubby *was* tentative, and O'Donnell wasn't, but the kid is not the second
coming of Christ either.
I still say that if Tweedledum Groh has the Giants playing basic defense
instead of prevent, the Steelers don't get back into the game....
btw, regarding the PI non-call, I feel it was fairly well offset by
Cashion's "i'm looking right at it, he's taken three steps but I'm
not gonna call" Roughing the Passer non-call.....
'Saw
|
35.263 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:53 | 14 |
| I gotta question.
The Steelers got hit with the celebration(bogus A$$ rule, IMHO) and
were penalized 5 yards on the kick-off, thus making them kick from the
30, instead of the 35. Anderson's kick goes out of bounds, ball should
be spotted at the 35, but they put the ball at the 40 yd line. Thus,
the Steelers get penalized TWICE for the infraction, right????
If Anderson had kicked the ball into the end zone, would they have
spotted the ball at the 25????? I think the refs screwed that one up.
But then again, I could be wrong, but it'd be the first time.
JaKe
|
35.264 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:55 | 1 |
| Isn't there a 5 yard penalty for kicking the ball out of bounds?
|
35.265 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:04 | 11 |
| It would depend on how the Kickoff OB rule is written.
A team has a choice of kick over or at the 35.
Now, if the "at the 35" part is ABSOLUTE, then there was a mistake.
If, however, that part of the rule is written "or at a spot x yards from
the spot of kickoff" then they are correct....
'Saw
|
35.266 | Steelers almost pulled a Raiders! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:15 | 13 |
| Looking through the replies I see that most think the Steelers stunk
up the place in the first half, but I gotta dis-agree, the Steelers
defense played well through-out the game (IMHO), but especially
in the second half when the offense woke up. Once the offense did
start scoring the defense clamped down and stopped the Giants from
returning the favor. O'Donnell has been getting the hero treatment
in here but the real heroes were on defense. Incidently, I wonder
what you guys think about Noll's decision to kick one of the first
two field goals when they had a chance to score a TD, and change
the whole outcome of the game, I remember thinking that they shoulda
gone for it.
Carlos
|
35.267 | Moral Victory...kind of | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:30 | 19 |
| Carlos, you are right about the Steelers D, but they did give up some
key 3rd downs during the entire game.
Regarding the first field goal, that's Noll. He takes points when he
can get them. With the way Brister and the O tend to shut down inside
the 20, I didn't disagree with kicking a field goal on 4th and goal
even though they were down by 20 points. And look what happened! By
taking the sure thing, the Steelers ultimately ended up in a position
to send the game into OT.
Somebody like Sam Wyche goes for it on 4th and goal. That's why Noll
is still one of the masters and Sam is on the ropes. Subtle confidence
will win more games than trickery.
Maybe there is something to this excellent loss thingie. Steelers will
be a better team because of last night's game and good coaching
decisions...maybe.
--dan'l
|
35.268 | Word To Your Mother Bubby.... You Stink !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football, Feel The Thunder | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:40 | 10 |
| Well,
I was really sorry to see the Squeelers lose that game last night.
I thought that their defense played extremly well and that Doug
McDoogle guy came on strong at QB in the second half. I was screaming
at the TV for them to bench BOOBY after the second series I can't
stand him or his mother. At any rate.... I say give the young guy
a shot, he can't possibly screw it up any worse than BUBBA....
Big Game
|
35.269 | Plus, they'll bring their Ref's with them ;-) | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Rockin' in the Free World | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:43 | 16 |
|
Mike, your argument would hold up if the Redskins had been simply
"getting by" their opponents..(ala Giants) Their victories however,
have been of the total domination variety. It took a trick play to
score points for the first time in RFK against their defense.
They marched with EASE against the previous top ranked defense in the
AFC and scored 42 points. They have a proven winner for a coach and
are stocked with veterans. Bill Parcels saw the writting on the wall
and took a hike. The Giants might have been the better team last year,
but I haven't seen anything this year to indicate ANY team in the league
is playing at the Redskins level this year.
I'll be amazed if the Giants can stay within 10 points of the Redskins
when they meet, provided the Redskins stay as hot as they are now.
/Jeff
|
35.270 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:51 | 21 |
|
I haven't heard anyone in here stating that O'Donnell is the
second coming. What I have heard are some people including me
stating that Bubby has had 4 years at the starting position with
little to show for it. We believe that it is time to make a change,
or at least give his backup a shot. It is clear that Brister has
had big problems with Walton's offense. Maybe it is one of those
things were O'Donnell is better suited to execute his offense.
That celebration penalty really killed the Steelers along with
Anderson kicking the ball out of bounds. If the Giants would of
started on the 30, the outcome might of been different.
Anyway, as a Steeler fan, I will welcome a change at QB. I've
sat through Cliff Stout, Mark Malone and now Bubby Brister. All
these guys were supposed to have the tools, but none never produced.
How long should a team wait until they make a change?
bill..g.
|
35.271 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:24 | 9 |
| I'll say this:
Brister should not have been playing. It's obvious to me
that at the very least O'Donnell looks very capable, and
why put a QB with a very chancy knee in there when you
could have pulled the kid in from the opening kickoff....
'Saw
|
35.272 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:31 | 19 |
| 'Saw,
I agree that Brister shouldn't have been playing. I also think he
should get to sit on his plate stacker for the next game, at least,
whilst O'Donnell, who is 100% helathy, gets a crack at running the
Steelers "O". As has been stated by others, Brister has had 4 years,
and, while showing some improvement, is is clearly evident that
barring an act of God, he'll never take the Steelers to the Super Bowl.
I've sat thru not only Stoudt, Malone and Brister, but the good years
AND bad years of Bradshaw, Hanratty and, Gilliam, who would've been one
helluva QB if he could've kept the needle out of his arm, plus Bill
Nelson before them and a long line of others, whose names escape me as
of this writing.
Give O'Donnell the chance to make Brister just a memory.
JaKe
|
35.273 | Yet Another ACC QB | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:44 | 6 |
| Neil O'Donnell, you say ??? Quarterbacking an NFL team, you say ???
Hmmm, very interesting. Wonder what collegiate football conference he
came from ...
Bob Hunt
|
35.274 | My 2 cents | WARIOR::QUINN_R | | Tue Oct 15 1991 19:51 | 19 |
|
I agree with giving O'Donnell a solid shot at the job. It has been
Noll's penchant to go with the veterans whether or not the younger
player appears to prove himself in practice or preseason. That has been
proven in more than one position. RB -- Barry Foster still doesn't get
enough carries but it took him two great preseasons and a Tim Worley
injury to play. Hoge is a good tough runner but there are times where
he simply shouldn't be in as the single back on second or third with
7-8-9-10yds to go. That should be Barry Foster territory. They
drafted to young wideouts who still seldom get in until garbage time.
I believe that Eric Green was quite lucky that the Steelers didn't
have a tight ends other than Mularky that Knoll had faith in when he
joined the team. At some point he has to put production over
potential when a player has had his opportunity to prove his worth.
Seattles no push over but this steeler team should really be ready to
redeem themselves after last night.
Roy L.
|
35.275 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:06 | 7 |
| US(eless)A TODAY says that Brister has a torn knee ligament and will,
most likely ride the bench .vs. the Seattle Ocean Pidgeons this Sunday.
Miracles never cease!!
JaKe
|
35.276 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:12 | 7 |
| The Steelers are 9th in the AFC in team offense moving an average
of 306.7 yds per game.
They are 7th in the AFC in team defense, giving up an average of 311
yards a game.(
JaKe
|
35.277 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:28 | 18 |
|
The interesting thing about the Steeler's this year is that they
do have some po-tential. When I thought about it, they have Green
who is in his second year and looks like he could be a great TE. They
have Foster who is either in his 2nd or 3rd year and it appears that
he could have a bright future. The secondary is also pretty young with
some 2nd and 3rd year players. With the addition of O'Donnell at
QB, he too is a 2nd year player. If they are building on the future,
these people could fit the bill. They are all young and hungry for
time and attention. Not to mention that there are some young WR's
too.
With a defensive lineman pick, this team could be poised to gel
in a couple of years if a QB ever decides to take over.
bill..g.
|
35.278 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:35 | 6 |
| FWIW, Foster is in his 2nd year and Eric Green is in his 3rd year.
JaKe
|
35.279 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:38 | 4 |
| Seachokes waived Kemp yesterday. I thought I heard Krieg is ready to
play again.
Joe
|
35.280 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Sons of Katie Elder | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:44 | 10 |
| It was nice to see Keith Willis still playing for the Steelers. He's a
great guy (went to Northeastern...) I was also happy to see his 55 1/2
career sacks rank him 3rd on the all-time Steeler list behind L.C. and
Mean Joe.
go Keith!
HD
|
35.281 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:49 | 10 |
|
re: Jake
Don't you have that backwards? Green was a rookie last year while
Foster was in his second year. Last year is when the Steeler's went
a whole month with scoring a TD. Green signs and scores a couple in
his first game in October.
bill..g.
|
35.282 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:04 | 12 |
| Bill,
Come to think of it, you may be right in regards to Green, but Foster
is definitely a 2nd year player. Lasted year was when he made his
biggest rookie mistake and let the kickoff .vs. the 49ers just fall on
the ground, and the 49ers recovered it, and subsequently scored putting
the game out of reach.
It just seems to me that Green has been around longer than 1+ years.
JaKe
|
35.283 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:27 | 23 |
| Green and Foster are both 2nd year players. Foster came out of college
at the end of his junior year. I think that, if he had stayed at
Arkansas another year, he may have been a #1 draft. The Black and Gold
are lucky he came out early and got him in the 4th round.
With regard to the Monday night game. The Steelers definately got robbed
with the non-call pass interference against Hoge. But they overcame it
later in the game. The penalty that really ticks me off is the one for
celebrating in the end zone which may have cost them the win. It wasn't
even a long or blatant celebration. I mean, what's a team supposed to do
when they come back from a 20-0 deficit and tie the game with 50 seconds
left. This celebration rule sucks.
I though the defense(even the pass rush) looked good the entire game.
There's only so much a defense can do when, for 3 quarter's, the offense
go 3 downs and out.
The offense definately looked more enthused and confident with O'Donnell
in the driver's seat. Glad to hear he'll start next week. They do have
some talent. I'm hoping this excellent lose will be a turning point for
the Black and Gold.
Keith
|
35.284 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:27 | 3 |
| So, was Bubby pulled on Monday night because he was ineffective or
because he was injured? Is this injury a way for Bubby and his backers
to save some face?
|
35.285 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:45 | 23 |
| re.284
Noll, quoted in US(eless)A TODAY, says he "screwed up".
"I made a mistake," said Noll. "That's one of the traps you run into
as a coach, when you go with a guy who's less than 100% when you have a
guy on the bench who can do the job."
The article says Brister had limped thru practices all week anbd also
wore a knee brace.
I think it's a combination of Brister being ineffective, and the injury
that caused him to be pulled. A couple of times, after Brister got
popped, he grasped the knee, and limped more noticably afterward.
FWIW, the Steeler's backup behind Neil O'Donnell is Rick Strom, who
first played for the team during the strike year.
Re Green and Foster, thanks for clearing that up, Keith.
JaKe
|
35.286 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:31 | 7 |
|
In the paper today they said that the official made the wrong call on the
celebration rule. it seems the NFL officials like the rule even less than the
fans so they are calling it for any celebration in hopes that the rules
comittee will pull it for next season....
Metz
|
35.287 | Tweet !!! (I hate this rule!!!) ???? | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:37 | 15 |
| � ... it seems the NFL officials like the rule even less than the fans so
� they are calling it for any celebration in hopes that the rules comittee
� will pull it for next season....
That's absolutely nuts. The only way to convince the NFL Rules Committee
that a rule is ridiculous is to *NOT* call it. Throwing the flag only
reinforces the bogus logic behind it.
If the refs really hated the rule, they'd keep their yellow hankies in
their pockets and watch with some amusement as Willie Wide Receiver does
some pre-meditated and excessive Hammer Time moves in the end zone.
Geez, cain't anybody get anything right these days ???
Bob Hunt
|
35.288 | Can you be more specific? | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:39 | 11 |
| >In the paper today they said that the official made the wrong call on the
>celebration rule.
Who is they?
How can a judgement call be called wrong?
What was wrong about it; the call or penalizing the Steelers twice for
one call?
--dan'l
|
35.289 | right next to article about Jane and Ted getting stuck in the Braves elevator | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:59 | 19 |
|
Direct from the local rag...
The chairman of the NFL's competition committee suggested that game officials
made the wrong call on an "illegal demonstration" penalty that helped the NY
Giants beat the Pittsburgh Steelers Monday Night.
Jim Finks, the rules chief, also said that game officials may be making such
calls as a protest against a rule they don't like.
The rule was invoked after the steelers scored the tyoing touchdown against the
Giants who eventually won the game 23-20.
"What I saw was not hte intent of our rules,"sad Fink, who is also president of
the NO Saints.
"It's a judgement call, up to the officials but my impression is that they don't
like the rule so they're going out of their way to call it to show that."
Metz
|
35.290 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 18:15 | 10 |
| I believe what Green did was exactly what the rule was supposed
to prevent. Now let me add that I think the rule stinks, but what
the league is doing to the referees stinks. Every time someone
whines or complains about it the league will say the refs made a
mistake in their interpretation of the call, making the indecision
on the referees part whether to throw a flag or not on this "illegal
demonstration" foul even greater. Main these guys would make great
Senators, dontcha think?
/Don
|
35.291 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Wed Oct 16 1991 21:26 | 13 |
| Pittsburgh was NOT penalized twice for the same call.
If the ensuing kickoff had not been erroneously kicked o/b, then
the Giants probably start around the 25.
I'm still not sure of the o/b kick rule.
If the rule states: kick again or start on 35, then the refs did it wrong.
However, if the rule is expressed as kick again or x yards from spot of kick
then NOT wrong....
'Saw
|
35.292 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:25 | 21 |
| I didn't see the play and I've been next unseeing a lot of things,
since I was at a class on Monday and Tuesday, so I don't know what
happened.
If a kickoff goes out of bounds without having been touched first by
anyone (other than the kicker), the receiving team has at least a
couple of options - take the ball at a point 30 yards from where the
ball was kicked or take the ball at the point where it went out of
bounds. I don't know if they still have the option to force the rekick
from 5 yards further back, but I believe they do.
Most kickoffs take place from the 35. Most kickoffs go out of bounds
at a point inside the receiving team's 35, hence, the usual outcome is
for the receiving team to take the ball on its 35. The only time the
receiving team would take the ball at the point where it went out of
bounds would be if it went out at a point between the 35 yard lines.
Under the new rule, I really can't imagine very many situations where
the receiving team would force a rekick on a kickoff out of bounds
since most kickoff returns don't get to the 35 anyway.
John
|
35.293 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:27 | 9 |
| And one more - there is a rarely applied rule that gives the receiving
team the ball at a very advantageous location on the field should the
kicking team kickoff out of bounds 3 consecutive times. In other
words, kickoff goes out of bounds, tack on the penalty. Kick again,
out of bounds again. Kick again, out of bounds again. I don't
remember the spot since it happens so seldom and probably never happens
now, given the rules change.
John
|
35.294 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:31 | 15 |
| Then the Steelers were NOT penalized twice for the same call.
1. Green gets hit with a 5 yard penalty for celebrating to
be enforced on the kickoff.
2. Kickoff from 30 yard line, goes OB.
3. Giants have option: rekick or start 30 yards from where
ball kicked... ie the 40 yard line.
No problem.
'Saw
|
35.295 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:14 | 5 |
| Thanks for the clarification, Ninj.
JaKe
|
35.296 | would have been fine for anyone else | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:52 | 4 |
| I still think it was a bad call....... Only because it favored
the Midgets !!
Big Game
|
35.297 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 19:05 | 8 |
| US(eless)A TODAY says that although the STEELERS haven't announced that
Neil O'Donnell will make his first NFL start, Sunday .vs. Seattle, but
injured QB Bubby Brister said: "(Coach) Chuck (Noll) told me he wants
me to rest my knee, so he's going with O'Donnell Sunday."
JaKe
|
35.298 | Useless Stat of the Day | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 19:15 | 6 |
| The Steelers are 4th in the NFL in total points scored per game, and
22nd in the league in total points per game given up.
JaKe
|
35.299 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Thu Oct 17 1991 19:43 | 8 |
|
Paper out here said that bubble will be bench bound for two weeks to rest his
knee......
Maybe mommy will kiss it and make it better,
Metz
|
35.300 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:44 | 34 |
| Mac
You wondered why I call the paper the hilton gives me every day
"US9eless)A TODAY, I'll tell ya now.
1st, the NLCS ended lasted night at about 10:30, mountain time. The
paper here doesn't even have a hint to what the score was.
And, 1st, In one part, they list Neil O'Donnell as being the starting
QB for the Steelers Sunday, .vs. the Seattle Ocean Pidgeons, whilst in
another column, not 12 inches away, they list Brister as the probable
starter, but state that he has a "Hamstring" injury., while the whole
football world knows that the guy hjas a gimpy knee, the result of a
torn ligament.
Lasted week, before the Gnats game, they listed on 3 consecutive days,
different knees as the injury. First leeft, then right, then left.
Suprized they didn't list a middle knee injury as his problem.
As a generic newspaper it's not too bad, but I think it's worth is much
greater when paper training a puppy, than as a source for ACCURATE
info.
Sheez, they have a main section, a money section,. a sports(term used
loosely) section, a Life section. Maybe they need to add a
"corrections" section, but that would double the size of the paper.
=Glad I'm going home tomorrow and will get to read REAL newspapers, ie
the Pittsburgh Press and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette!!!
JaKe
|
35.301 | Have a fun flight back, maybe next time... | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:23 | 5 |
| Why Jake, you couldn't possibly be refering to the Gazzette? I hope
you haven't wasted your time reading Ralph Rotton's column.....He is
such a hypacrit (sp?), not to mention he doesn't have a clue.....
Tim
|
35.302 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:27 | 13 |
| Tim
Nah, the HILTON didn't give me the Colo. Springs Gasette, just
US(eless)A TODAY.
>> -< Have a fun flight back, maybe next time... >-
After 4 weeks in a hotel, away from the wife and little ones, I
thoroughly look forward to tomorrow afternoon whence I arrive back in
Pittsburgh.
JaKe
|
35.303 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:59 | 10 |
| JaKe,
USA Today must have different editions 'cuz I picked mine up at a 7-11
this morning and it has a story on the game plus a complete box.
BTW, it was a pleasure meeting you, glad you enjoyed yourself at the AF
game and have a good flight back.
Joe
|
35.304 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:18 | 9 |
| > USA Today must have different editions 'cuz I picked mine up at a 7-11
> this morning and it has a story on the game plus a complete box.
They do. Check the upper left corner of the front page -- it'll say
either "Inside Sports" or "Sports Final". "Sports Final" is the later
version.
py
|
35.305 | When do the hockey playoffs start? | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:21 | 19 |
| For the record, the Steelers stunk yesterday. Except for a beauty of a
pass from O'Donnell to Dwight Stone for the only Pittsburgh score, I
honestly can't remember any other play, offensive or defensive, that
was executed well enough to even smile about.
The secondary was pitiful. The linebackers were used and abused. The
defensive line got close but never got to Craig.
Too many mistakes all around. Penalty after penalty. Tough to win
football games like that.
O'Donnell still has what it takes but had no time whatsoever to throw
the ball yesterday. The offensive line was pushed around like toys.
Any word on the injury to Barry Foster? What a blow that would be,
although Warren Williams and Leroy Thomspon are quite adequate as
backups.
--dan'l
|
35.306 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:07 | 5 |
| I just hope that Chuck doesn't judge O'Donnell to harshly for
this one performance..... The Squeelers need to leave Bubby
on the bench !!!
Big Game
|
35.307 | Can't figure 27-7 at home | WARIOR::QUINN_R | | Mon Oct 21 1991 20:45 | 11 |
|
I can't figure it. Just when the steelers look like they are about to
get things headed in the right direction the run into a brick wall. I
didn't see the game yesterday but the 10 minute ticker sure made it
look bad. On the little clip yesterday on primetime they only showed
the steelers getting burned and Greg Lloyd on bunch of late hits. Was
the steelers offense as bad as the first half Monday night which left
the defense on the field all game or is the defense actually playing
that bad?
Roy L.
|
35.308 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Mon Oct 21 1991 21:23 | 25 |
| FWIW, O'Donnell was 14 of 22 for 184 yards, with one TDand 1 int.
not too bad for the way the rest of the team played.
Noll was quoted,"We just did not function. We made mistake after
mistake after mistake. Offensively, we killed ourselves, Defensively,
we killed ourselves."
Added Gene Collier, columnist for the Pittsburgh Press:
"Uh-huh. The rare double suicide, with an inquest continuing on
special teams, a third corpse at the crime scene."
14 penalties, 6 fumbles, 5 missed tackles, minimum, 4 scks, 3 dropped
passes, one interception, one blocked punt. One conversion on nine
third or fourth down situations. More indiscretions than Jimmy
Swaggart, more blunders bloopers and boners than "America's Funniest
Home Videos!!!
The Steelers sipped, no make that SUCKED yesterday. If they don't get
their a$$es in gear, they may be lucky to win 2 or 3 more games the
rest of the year.
JaKe
|
35.309 | Hire Ron Meyer... | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Oct 22 1991 19:15 | 4 |
| Where is Childs? HE talks crap about other teams when they lose,
but is silent here?
Tim
|
35.310 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Tue Oct 22 1991 22:22 | 49 |
| STEELERS .vs. SeaPidgeons
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
SeaPidgeons 3 14 3 7 27
STEELERS 0 0 7 0 7
Sea--FG Kasay 36 yd
Sea--Williams 1 yd run(Kasay PAT)
Sea--Chadwick 14 yd pass from Krieg(Kasay PAT)
STEELERS--Stone 57 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Sea--FG Kasay 21 yd
Sea--Tice 1 yd pass from Krieg(Kasay PAT)
Attendance--54,678
TEAM STATISTICS
Seattle STEELERS
18 First Downs 12
30-65 Rushes-Yds 15-78
25-31-0 Compl-Att-Int 14-22-1
3-7 Sacked-Yds lost 4-22
6-46 Punts 7-33
0-0 Fumbles-lost 6-2
6-48 Penalties-Yds 14-90
39:55 Time of Possession 20:05
Individual Stats:
RUSHING
Seattle: J.L.Williams 17-43, Warren 11-13, Krieg 2-9
STEELERS: Foster 7-36, Hoge 6-22, Thompson 1-14, O'Donnell 1-6
PASSING
Seattle: Krieg 25-31-0-266 yds
STEELERS: O'Donnell 14-22-1-184 yds
RECEIVING
Seattle: J.L.Williams 7-50, Kane 6-102, Chadwick 5-76, Blades 3-29,
Tice 2-7, Clark 1-5, Warren 1-(-3)
STEELERS: Calloway 3-32, Lipps 3-28, Stone 2-67, Hoge 2-18, Thompson
2-8, Green 1-18, Foster 1-13.
FUMBLES
STEELERS: Foster 2, O'Donnell 2, Lloyd 1, Hoge 1.
JaKe
|
35.311 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Tue Oct 22 1991 23:20 | 109 |
| It's not quite midseason for the STEELERS yet, BUT, if they keep
playing like they did Sunday against the SeaPidgeons, the second half
of this season is going to seem like an eternity. The Steelers were
supposed to have an improved defense over lasted year, which would have
made them about the best in the NFL, but so far, the defense has been
offensive. More like a strainer trying to hold water.
Now the offense. This is the 2nd(and hopefully last) year of the "Joe
Booger Walton" offense in Pittsburgh. Lasted year, it took 4 games
before the Steeler offense scored a TD. This year, although the
Steeler offense has scored some TD's, they are a 3 down and out
offense, suffering from penalties, penalties, penalties. It seems
that every time the STEELERS get the freakin' ball, somebody jumps
before the snap, or somebody is guilty of holding, or some other STUPID
penalty pops up and the Steelers are faced with starting in a deep
hole. So far, the Steelers are averaging 8 penalties for 58
yards/game.
What doesn't help, they are suffering from horrendous play
calling on third down, by, you guessed it, Joe "Booger" himself. The
offense is truly offensive, too!!! Poor execution, putrid offensive
line, receivers dropping an average of 4 passes per game, fumbles,
fumbles fumbles...Although Barry Foster leads the Steelers in rushing
yardage, he has fumbled 5 times in 84 carries, an average of once every
16+ times he gets the ball.
The STEELERS have not beaten a team with a winning record yet.
Their 3 victories came against teams whose aggregate mark is 4-19,
while their 4 losses came against teams who are a combined 18-12.
The Steelers have been thru the easy part of their schedule now and
tougher roads lie ahead. At this point, judging by the teams they've
played, the STeelers should be 5-2 or even 6-1, but the team just never
seems to be prepared properly, and takes 2 or more quarters to get the
ball moving, and by then it's too late and they're normally facing a
comeback instead of holding a lead.
The Steelers remaining schedual, and my predictions for these games are
as follows
Oct 27, at Clevescum
Clevescum is fielding a much improved team over lasted year. Bernice
is getting more time to throw and has played well so far this year.
The defense is much improved also. If the STEELERS "SHOW UP" for this
game, it should be a close one, but judging by the way they've played
so far, I see it as Clevescum 24-10.
Nov. 3 at Denver
Don't know much about the Donks this year, but their 5-2 and leading
the AFC West, and seem to be playing much better ball than they did
lasted year, also. The Steelers and Donks have put on some good, close
football games in the past at Pile-It-High, bgut the STEELERS will
succumb to thin air, and thin brain tissue on part of Joe "Booger"
and fall again, 31-13.
Nov 10, at Cincinnati
Sam Wyche, getting crazier by the week, will don a clown outfit and
show his true colors. By halftime, he will have been taken off of the
field by 3 large men in white suits, never to be seen again outside of
the asylum. Ickey Woods gets named interim coach and spends the second
half getting flagged for doing stupid dances on the sidelines everytime
it looks like the Bungholes will gain a yard. Still, the STEELERS trip
over their own feet, but nudge out a close one, 21-20.
NOV 17 Washington
STEELERS get scalped, 42-3.
Nov. 24 Houscum
Warmand Mooned and the Oilslicks invade Three Rivers and slip thru the
declining secondary, building a 24 point first half lead, but slip in
the second half but still manage to hold on, 35-24.
Nov 28 at Dallass
Troy Aikman and Mr PerfectHair's Cryboys have a tough day in Tex-Ass
stadium, but Steeler penalties again come back to haunt them on
Thanksgiving day as the Steelers get caught with turkey on their face,
24-23.
DEC 8, at Houscum
The Oilslicks, with their pansy blue, in the house of the brain dead,
look past the STEELERS, and fall flat on their faces, losing to the
Black and Gold, 24-10.
Dec 15, Cincinnati
The Bungholes come into Three Rivers with their newest gimmick, the
hurry up defense. Boomer tries throwing right handed, and the
Bungholes lose their 15th of the year, 27-6.
Dec 22 Clevescum
The Brown(spot)s(tm) and the STEELERS both enter this game with 6-9
records. Bernice will be out for this game, after spraining an ankle
when the heel of his favorite pumps breaks off unexpectedly. his
replacement will do his Bubby Brister imitation, while Brister does his
Bubby Brister imitation, and the teams finish out the '91 season
playing to a 3-3 tie that sees league records in both penalties in one
game, and in penalty yardage in one game. 3-3
The Steelers would have to consider this season a success if they
finish at .500. The continued ineptitude on either side of the ball
should be cause for a house cleaning of all assistatn coaches, and
possibly of the entire coaching staff, Noll himself included.
These are only my predictions as of right now, they are subject to
revision at any time, and are in no way factual.
JaKe
|
35.312 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 00:09 | 6 |
| BTW, the Steelers were 1-8 on third down conversions Sunday, bringing
their season total to 18 of 70 on 3rd down(a whopping 25.7%).
JaKe
|
35.313 | STEELER FANS: Required reading!!!! | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 00:10 | 100 |
| Reprinted from The Pittsburgh Press, without permission, from Monday, Oct 21,
1991
by
Gene Collier
Neil O'Donnell, making his first professional start at QB, completed 14
of 22 passes for 184 yards, including a 57 yard TD strike to Dwight Stone
yesterday as almost all of the other Steelers stunk like you wouldn't believe
and got ripped by the Seattle Seahawks, 27-7, in a game Seattle should have
been ashamed not to win by 50 points.
Hmph. It wasn't that hard at all.
I'm supposed to be writing about O'Donnell, but I couldn't figure out
how to work him in.
He was merely the mechanic on duty yesterday, bent over the blown
engine that is the 1991 Steelers. He just happened to be standing around when
the brilliant sunshine backlit this team for what it really is, a noxious
backfire of ignorance and apathy with the collective attention span of cheese.
"We didn't have a good week(of practice)," Chuck Noll said, "We have to
have better preparation if we have to stay out all day and all night to get
that attention."
"We just did not function. We made mistake after mistake after
mistake. Offensively, we killed ourselves. Defensively, we killed ourselves."
Uh-huh. The rare double suicide, with an inquest continuing on special
teams, a third corpse at the crime scene.
How it'll wash out is hard to tell, but the easiest conviction should
be fraud. Charging people cash to see THIS under the label of professional
football should get somebody three to five.
But back to O'Donnell. Although Neil did his very best, it's not fair
to imply that the young man was the only Steeler who was mistake-free. In
truth, he was once charged with delay of game; his problem was that he couldn't
delay it enough.
His teammates helped put together a memorable opening series for him.
It included three penalties, a fumble, a sack, and they wrapped it up with a
blocked punt. THE TOTAL PACKAGE!!
Then, things got ugly!!!
O'Donnell searched his memory to find out why he wanted this job. The
Steelers did this for him, fumbled six times, committed 14 penalties, dropped
three passes, blew about a dozen assignments and nearly got him killed.
The offense, had seven false starts, more than NASA. Tom Ricketts got
the hat trick, although not a natural one as the Steelers tucked six other
penalties between his second and third false starts.
"I just told everyone to keep working hard," O'Donnell said of his
comportment in the huddle. "I told them to just relax, that mistakes were
going to happen. I just never thought that this many could happen."
Even in his own naivete, O'Donnell had a right to expect better for
himself than this, but expecting anything at all from this team is only a
gaurantee of disappointment.
In the third wuarter, with a sullen crowd growing hostile, punter Dan
Stryzinski's baby picture was flashed on the scoreboard as part of a quiz, a
multiple choice name-that-baby bit. Better to take all of these guys baby
pictures and put them in the game program each week.
Poise??Demeanor??Concentration?? Yes, of babies, and the baby lobby
probably won't be too happy with that.
Rod "No Comment" Woodson drew consecutive unsportsmanlike conduct
penalties, Donald Evans was ejected for hitting somebody(finally) and Greg
Lloyd threw in an incredible daily double--the offside penalty on third and 5
and the drive sustaining cheap-shot roughing the passer penalty.
These guys are critical parts of the defense that turned generic
Seattle QB Dave Krieg into Otto Graham.
Krieg, in his first game after seven weeks of inactivity, went 25 for
31(including 19 for his first 22) in leading a pedestrian team to a 17-0 lead
and on to an easy victory, it's fourth in eight games.
On O'Donnell's side of the ball, things are much worse, so much so that
Neil might be losing touch.
"I don't think anybody on this team is going to give up," he said.
Too late on that one.
"There's a lot of talent out there."
Too early on that one.
Offensively, figuring the Steelers is like reading some absurd, poorly
crafted mystery. Under the old Chuck Noll/Tom Moore offense, you always knew
what was wrong when it was; the fellows weren't executing. Under the new Chuck
Noll/Joe Walton offense, all anybody including the offense knows is that it
just doesn't work.
Yesterday's time of pessession was 20:05, the sixth consecutive game in
which the Steelers failed to get half the possession time, the sixth in which
they failed to get even 27 minutes. Even if you're scoring in those precious
minutes, you're putting too much pressure on the defense, not that the Steelers
are scoring, and not that the defense doesn't collapse under minimal pressure,
anyway.
The Steelers have scored one ruching TD in the past five games, and
when Dwight Stone scored his second TD of the year yesterday, he moved ahead of
Louis Lipps, the other starting wideout, who remains tied with linebacker Bryan
Hinkle with one. Oh, I forgot, the passing game is tight-end oriented. Is
that why the supposed best tight end around got the ball thrown to him once
yesterday???
Somebody get a clue with this team.
Noll was clear with his distaste for yesterday's performance, and
suitably threatening in his proposed solutions, but when someone asked him what
causes a team to be so ragged, so undisciplinied, he said:
"Your guess is as good as mine."
If that is true, what's he doing there?????
JaKe
|
35.314 | At least we and the Pittsburgh press are objective... | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:11 | 11 |
| JaKe, thanks for printing .313. Truly sums things up. I especially
loved:
> The Steelers have scored one ruching TD in the past five games, and
>when Dwight Stone scored his second TD of the year yesterday, he moved ahead of
>Louis Lipps, the other starting wideout, who remains tied with linebacker Bryan
>Hinkle with one. Oh, I forgot, the passing game is tight-end oriented. Is
>that why the supposed best tight end around got the ball thrown to him once
>yesterday???
--dan'l
|
35.315 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:55 | 6 |
|
Hi Tim, I'm here what would you like me to say? So the Steelers
stunk sunday woopie. If I was you I wouldn't throw stones when
my team finished in lasted placed lasted yeared..
;^)
|
35.316 | Bring back the trap plays | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Oct 23 1991 12:13 | 7 |
| Jake, .311 is a great note. I laughed after every line. Maybe
you should send it into Steeler's Digest. The only sad thing is that
it looks like all of your predictions will come true.
J_e (where's the o) has to go.
Keith
|
35.317 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:47 | 13 |
| Barry Foster's sprained ankle most likely will keep him out of Sunday's
game in the sludge pit.
Noll said that since Worley is not ready physically(probably mentally
too) to return, the Steelers may go to the "Mistake by the Lake" with
only 3 running backs.
Noll also said that Neil o'Donnell will get at least one, maybe more,
starts whilst Brister nurses his boo-boo on his knee.
JaKe
|
35.318 | Donks Lasted(tm) place finish better than the Squeelers | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Wed Oct 23 1991 17:40 | 7 |
| Now Now Mikey.... don't get too cranky with Tim..... You know
we all hate to see you beloved Squeelers fall victim to the sea
chickens. Listen Mikey..... I'd be willing to bet the Squeelers
don't win another game this year and finish with a much worse
record than the donks did lasted(tm) year.
Big Game
|
35.319 | Worley searching for the answer to his problems | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 21:42 | 6 |
| Steeler Running back Tim Worley checked into an Alcohol Rehab center
today.
JaKe
|
35.320 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:33 | 3 |
|
What a waste of talent. I thought Worley would be a dominant force
in the NFL for years.
|
35.321 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Thu Oct 24 1991 17:01 | 8 |
| Graoner,
Looks more like a waste of a #1 draft pick to me!!!!
But the Steelers are used to wasting those.
JaKe
|
35.322 | Numbers, Numbers, and more Numbers | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Fri Oct 25 1991 20:00 | 164 |
| STEELER STATS thru 7 games
Results and Attendance:
STEELERS 26 San Diego 20 55,848
STEELERS 34 Buffalo 52 79,545
STEELERS 20 New England 6 53,703
STEELERS 14 Philadelphia 23 65,511
STEELERS 21 Indianapolis 3 55,383
STEELERS 20 NY Giants 23 57,608
STEELERS 7 Seattle 27 54,678
Record 3-4
TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS Opponents
Total First Downs 103 133
Rushing 37 42
Passing 64 80
Penalty 5 11
Third-down:
made/att 18/70 47/105
3rd down percentage 25.7 44.8
4th Down Percentage 0.0 100
Total Net Yards 2080 2190
Avg. per game 297.1 312.9
total plays 353 464
Avg. per play 5.9 4.7
Net Yards Rushing 731 770
per game 104.4 100
total rushes 153 220
Net Yards Passing 1349 1420
per game 192.7 202.9
Sacked/yds lost 16/134 19/119
Gross yards 1483 1539
Att/Comp 184/108 225/145
Completion % 58.7 64.4
Had intercepted 8 6
Punts/Average 36/38.9 35/41.0
Net Punting Avg. 35.6 33.9
Penalties/yards 58/412 36/266
Fumbles/lost 19/5 5/4
Touchdowns 16 16
Rushing 4 4
Passing 10 11
Returns 2 1
Score by periods:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 20 20 20 62 142
Opponents 27 52 24 51 154
INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS
SCORING
TD
Rush pass ret PAT FG S total pts
Anderson 0 0 0 16/16 10/11 0 46
EricGreen 0 4 0 0 0 0 24
Hoge 2 1 0 0 0 0 18
Foster 1 1 0 0 0 0 12
Stone 0 2 0 0 0 0 12
Calloway 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
Hinkle 0 0 1 0 0 0 6
Lipps 0 1 0 0 0 0 6
Mills 0 0 1 0 0 0 6
W.Williams 1 0 0 0 0 0 6
STEELERS 4 10 2 16/16 10/11 0 142
Opponents 4 11 1 16/14 14/18 0 154
RUSHING:
# Yds Avg Long TD
Foster 75 428 5.7 56 1
Hoge 59 328 4.0 15 2
Thompson 3 26 8.1 14 0
O'Donnell 4 24 6.0 11 0
W.Williams 9 16 1.8 9 1
Brister 3 -3 -1.0 2 0
STEELERS 153 731 4.8 56 4
RECEIVING:
# yds avg long TD
EricGreen 25 400 16.0 49 4
Hoge 20 146 7.3 16 1
Lipps 19 221 11.6 24 1
Stone 13 316 24.3 89 2
Foster 9 117 13.0 31 0
Calloway 8 150 18.8 33 1
Mularkey 5 55 11.0 21 9
W.Williams 4 40 10.0 29 0
Thompson 4 23 5.9 9 0
Graham 1 15 15.0 15 0
STEELERS 108 1483 13.7 89 10
Opponents 125 1539 10.6 53 11
INTERCEPTIONS:
# Yds TD
Hinkle 1 57 1
Everett 1 27 0
Griffin 1 22 0
Woodson 1 20 0
Johnson 1 0 0
Lloyd 1 0 0
STEELERS 6 126 1
Opponents 8 83 1
PUNTING:
# Yds Avg Blk
Stryzinski 35 1402 40.1 1
STEELERS 35 1402 40.1 1
Opponents 35 1435 41.0 0
PUNT RETURNS:
# FC Yds Avg Long TD
Woodson 17 9 214 12.6 40 0
Graham 2 1 13 6.5 13 0
Mills 1 0 0 0.0 0 1
Vincent 1 0 1 1.0 1 0
STEELERS 21 10 228 10.9 40 1
Opponents 9 17 62 6.9 16 0
KICKOFF RETURNS
# Yds Avg Long TD
Woodson 23 467 20.3 42 0
Mills 4 129 32.3 54 0
Stone 2 29 14.5 25 0
Thompson 1 8 8.0 8 0
STEELERS 30 633 21.1 54 0
Opponents 19 343 18.1 33 0
PASSING:
Att Compl Yds Pct TD Int
Brister 136 81 1053 59.6 6 7
O'Donnell 48 27 430 56.3 5 1
STEELERS 184 108 1483 58.7 11 8
Opponents 225 145 1539 64.4 11 6
QB SACKS
Lloyd 4
J.Williams 4
Willis 4
Evans 2
Hinkle 2
Jones 2
Veasey 1
G.Williams 1
JaKe
|
35.323 | GRRRRRRR! | UFHIS::MENGLISH | | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:03 | 13 |
| xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
x x x x
x x x x
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x
x x
x x
x WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF! x
x x
x x
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x
x x x x
x x x x
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
|
35.324 | re-.1 edited for realism | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Mon Oct 28 1991 17:03 | 17 |
| xxxxxxxxxx
x x
x x
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x
x
x
BERNICE'S "DAWG" BONE x
x
x
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x
x x
x x
xxxxxxxxxx
|
35.325 | Steelers now 3-5 | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Mon Oct 28 1991 21:04 | 51 |
| SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 7 0 7 14
Brown(spot)s(tm) 3 7 7 0 17
'Spots-- FG Stover, 34 yds
'Spots-- Hoard 2 yd lookiewhatIfound, er, I mean pass from Bernice,
Stover PAT
STEELERS-- O'Donnell 1 yd run, Anderson PAT
'Spots-- MacK 1 yd run, Stover PAT
STEELERS-- Willians 1 yd run, Anderson PAT
A--78285
TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS Brown(spot)s(tm)
18 1st Downs 19
23-75 Rushes-Yards 27-83
207 Passing Yds 179
19-35-2 Compl-Att-Int 21-29-0
2-14 Sacked-Yds Lost 0-0
1-37 Punts 3-41
1-0 Fumbles-Lost 1-0
5-35 Penalties-Yds 6-40
26:41 Time of Possession 33:19
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: Hoge 12-48, Williams 9-26, O'Donnell 2-1.
'Spots: Mack 19-54, Metcalf 1-12, Moris 2-9, Bernice 4-6, Hoard 1-2
PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 19-35-2int, 221 yds
'Spots: Bernice 21-29-0int 179 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Hoge 6-56, Lipps 5-69, Stone 3-53, Green 3-25, Calloway 1-17, Cooper
1-1
'Spots: Brennan 5-52, Slaughter 4-38, Mack 4-21, Metcalf 3-23, Langhorne 2-13,
Jackson 1-26, Galbraith 1-4, Hoard 1-2.
PUNTING:
STEELERS: Stryzinski 1-37 yds
'Spots: Hansen 3-124
JaKe
|
35.326 | Today's Gene Collier | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Mon Oct 28 1991 21:58 | 90 |
| STEELERS CREATING AN ILLUSION OF MEDIOCRITY; TRUTH IS, THEY AREN'T THAT GOOD!
reprinted from The Pittsburgh Press, Monday 10-28-1991
without permission
BY
Gene Collier
CLEVELAND--The Steelers worked 60 hard minutes on an illusion here yesterday
and very nearly sold it to the Cleveland Browns and some 78,000 of their
admirers.
The ruse was that Chuck Noll's team was of standard blood and guts
posture and temperament, eminently worthy of this storied rivalry, and
certainly a physical match for anybody on Any Given Sunday, especially a team
with a record no better than it's own 3-4.
Right, and Sophie Masloff is an operatic Tenor.
The gap between how ostensibly mediocre the Steelers are and how bad
they really are is sometimes so vast that people get lost in it. They
hallucinate.
Look at Bernie Kosar, Browns QB, who yesterday threw an unusual 2-yard
TD pass that clanked off a defender and fell into the hands of Leroy Hoard, who
was flat on his back in the end zone.
"I really don't know what happened," Kosar said, "I know the ball was
tipped; I think by them. I saw it tipped and I saw a black jersey."
Well, Bernie, there were no black jerseys out there yesterday. The
Steelers wore white and the Browns wore brown. See? These Steelers just
aren't what they appear.
Had Noll's team somehow pulled this off, perhaps had Gary Anderson's
52-yarder avoided the upright to the good side and perhaps had he banged home
another in overtime, noll's team would be 4-4 and someone would be trying to
figure a route to a wild-card game.
Fortunately, there was a man out there in the grass playing his 25th
Steelers-Browns game, and he made two monstrous plays in the final minutes to
put just the right spin on things.
Clay Matthews, the 35-year old linebacker who first met the Steelers in
1978, ran down Neil O'Donnell on a blitz for a 9-yard loss with 1:33 to play,
shoving the Steelers into a third and 19 situation from which they would not
emerge.
"We'd called for that blitz once before, but they'd jumped offsides on
the play," Matthews said, "I didn't really do anything on it; they just didn't
block me."
Oh, Matthews has made maybe 200 tackles in this series. They jsut
didn't block him on that play.
Two plays later, O'Donnell was looking for Eric Green down the middle
for a fourth and 14 desperation fastball. Matthews intercepted and ran 35
yards toward the lake, ending this episode with Cleveland ahead 17-14.
"It's always gratifying to beat the Steelers," Matthews said, "The
interesting thing was that before the game we went out there and the rain was
coming down and for some reason, my first five years here, when the Steelers
were really good, every time we played them it was like that. It was just like
we turned the clock back 10 to 14 years."
That, of course, is strictly a weather related deja vu.
Had this been 14 years ago, the Steelers would have crushed this Browns
team like a roach. Cleveland went into its eighth game claiming only victories
against Steelers patsies New England and San Diego and a one-point victory
against still winless Cincinnati. Opponents were converting nearly half of
their third downs against the Cleveland defense, and the Steelers used that
weakness to improve their horrible conversion rate toward actual
respectability.
And yet at a station many would characterize as not very good at all,
the Browns were clearly superior to Noll's team, especially in the aspect of
ball control.
Cleveland ate two-thirds of the first quarter on the game's opening
possession with a 15-play drive, its longest of the season. A subsequent
15-play drive swallowed 7 1/2 minutes.
"Seven and eight minute drives kill you," Noll said after his club's
third consecutive loss, and fourth in its past five games. "It doesn't leave
enough time for the offense."
Right, especially this offense, which continues to "develop" at about
the rate of a third world country. Only two of their eight opponents have
figured out a way to allow three Steelers touchdowns on the same day, and one
of those was Indianapolis.
What a team like the houston Oilers is going to do to the Steelers
isn't entirely clear, but I'll bet it's something like what the Denver Broncos
and Washington Redskins are going to do with them as well, and it won't be
flattering.
If they're fortunate, the Steelers will finish without another victorym
or with one at the most, and that will clarify the situation. This is not a
team or a franchise that needs tinkering or patience. It needs a wrecking ball
and then an architect.
You should really hope it doesn't rally to 8-8 and send the wrong
signal. Any run toward a wild card would ensure another decade of hopeful
non-achievment.
JaKe
|
35.327 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Mon Oct 28 1991 22:01 | 9 |
| In yesterday's(Sunday's) "Press", Gene Collier compared Noll's record
over the lasted few years with other "former" coaches records over the
same time span. To say Noll's Steeler teams have been mediocre over
that timespan is an understatement. If'n the Mrs. didn't pitch it,
I'll bring it in tomorrow and enter it into here if I gets the chance.
Good article.
JaKe
|
35.328 | Here's the article I promised in -.1 | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Tue Oct 29 1991 23:00 | 99 |
| STEELERS JOB MAY NOT BE NOLL'S LIFE'S WORK
Reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Press
10-27-1991
By
Gene Collier
Remember Al Saunders????
No, not the guy on ESPN, that's John Saunders.
Nope, not the former Pirates announcer, that's John Sanders.
No, not the minor league maven in "Bull Durham", that's Susan Sarandon;
now you're getting ridiculous.
Al Saunders, c'mon. One-time head coach of a National Football League
team, sort of. I mean pretty recently.
All right, don't sweat it. Just about nobody remembers the Al Saunders
era, mostly because he took over for Don Coryell halfway through the 1986
season and hung around the San Diego Chargers until the end of 1988, then he
wasn't there anymore. No big thing; he just didn't so enough to keep his job
by contemporary standards. He went 17-22 and that wasn't what his employers
had in mind.
At exactly the same time, that's mid '86 until the end of 1988, Chuck
Noll's record with the Steelers was exactly the same, 17-22. Even head to
head, Noll and Saunders met twice and split.
But Saunders is long gone and all but forgotten while Noll remains
unforgettable. What was unacceptable in San Diego was acceptable in
Pittsburgh, and remains so.
At the end of the 1989 season, Jerry Glanville had overstayed his
welcome in Houston. He landed a job with the Atlanta Falcons right about the
time he was going to land among the nation's unemployed. His record at
Houston, in five seasons, was 38-41 and the Oilers reached the playoffs three
times.
In that same period, Noll went 35-44 and the Steelers made the playoffs
once. Less than what was unacceptable in Houston was acceptable in Pittsburgh,
and remains so.
On Oct 1, coach Ron Meyer was fired by the Indianapolis Colts. The
Colts were 0-5, but Meyer's record, beginning with the 14th game of the 1986
season, was 36-35, and the Colts reached the playoffs once.
In that same period, Noll was 35-35, and the Steelers made the playoffs
once. Less than what was unacceptable in Indianapolis was acceptable in
Pittsburgh, and remains so.
For Meyer, it was his second firing. He was dismissed by the New
England Patriots in 1984 after having won 18 and lost 14 in a period in which
Noll went 20-13. So essentially, Meyer was fired in two different places for
going 54-51 while Noll was a vastly superior 55-48. Hey, Pittsburgh has its
standards.
At the end of the 1989 season, Ray Berry was no longer welcome at New
England. His teams had made the playoffs twice and one was the only New
England team ever to reach the Super Bowl. Berry's record was 48-39 when his
days as a head coach ended.
In that same period, Noll went 40-47. Less than what was unacceptable
in New England was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and remains so.
As Berry's career as a head coach was ending, so was Joe Walton's with
the Jets. Walton had coached seven seasons and his teams had made the playoffs
twice. His record was 54-59-1. In those seven years, he had won exactly as
many games as Noll.
What was unacceptable in New York was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and
remains so much so that Walton now runs the Steelers' offense, such as it is.
Obviously, Noll does not have to conform to contemporary standards. It
is enough that he "might". The team he runs out there today against the
Cleveland Browns "might" go 3-13; that's how bad it is.
When last seen, Noll's 23rd team was playing a game we've all seen
before, playing out a classic script. It was the typical
"game-before-the-coach-is-fired" performance. Fourteen penalties, seven for
false starts(the trademark of an undisciplined, poorly coached team), six
fumbles, pathetic offense, its emotional wiring smoking and cracking on defense
with unsportsmanlike conduct, unnecessary roughness, and other violations, one
of which drew an ejection. The basic, total disgrace.
"I'm not going to say too much at this time; there's not much to be
said about that game," Steelers president Dan Rooney said in his office the
other day. And he didn't. As to the matter of the head coaches
accountability, either for his team, this season, or this past decade, Rooney
said only, "Everybody has accountability in this organization."
Perhaps so, but the accountability, if the head coaches situation is
any indicator, is to a low standard.
One hundred and fifty people have been hired as head coaches in the NFL
since Rooney hired Noll in 1969. Buffalo has hired 11, Indianapolis 11, New
England 10, Houston 9 and New Orleans 9. Those are the examples of
instability, certainly, but they are also examples of pulse. Even franchises
of relative stability-Denver, the Raiders, the Rams, and Cincinnati; four that
have produced 6 Super Bowl teams since Pittsburgh last did--have hired 16 head
coaches since Rooney hired Noll.
Rooney no doubt envisions a day when he will tell Chuck it's over, but
i think when he does, he also hears the voice of John Facenda, intoning all the
glories of the '70s in that Hall of Fame soundtrack, and it makes it very hard.
Noll's a legend and a hall of famer, so one last comparison.
At the end of the 1988 season, Tom Landry had soached his last game for
the Dallas Cowboys. He was the only head coach in their history. He'd won
more games(270) and been to more Super Bowls(5) than even Chuck Noll. But in
his final four seasons, the Cowboys went 27-36. Over that same period, Noll
went 26-37. What was no longer acceptable in Dallas, even by a legend and a
hall of famer, was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and remains so.
The Cowboys are 5-2 and making progress. The Steelers are only making
mistakes.
JaKe
|
35.329 | Not to be taken for granted | UFHIS::MENGLISH | | Wed Oct 30 1991 02:37 | 2 |
| Great article! The more I read from this guy here, the more I miss the
wonderful sports writers in the states.
|
35.330 | | CAM::WAY | MUNG, the #1 WORST Treat | Wed Oct 30 1991 07:47 | 3 |
| That guy is good.
He's even approaching Dave Barry status, although with a sports bent....
|
35.331 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Snorkeller extraordinaire | Wed Oct 30 1991 16:27 | 12 |
|
Noll said yesterday that, for all intents and purposes, the position of
starting QB is O'Donnell's to lose. He said that although O'donnell
has made some mistakes, ie interceptions and formation problems, he
remains impressed with the second year QB.
Huey Richardson, who had the "scope" stuck in his knee in Sept, started
practicing Oct 18, and now has a severely inflammed knee. The Steelers
luck with first rounders sips big-time.
JaKe
|
35.332 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Fri Nov 01 1991 16:00 | 21 |
| Tim Worley is at it again, this guy seems to be trying to get himself
kicked off of the Steelers for good.
Word has it that he has been suspended for 6 games, (until Dec 9th) for
failing drug tests. Seems they found traces of nose candy in his
leakage.
He had tested positive for cocaine during the summer but the NFL
doesn't release first time offenders names.
Worley is currently receiving rahabilitative services for Alcohol
abuse.
He better get his head on straight or his NFL career will have been
VERY VERY short.
Sheez, the guy had the world by the balls and is trying to throw it
away.
JaKe
|
35.333 | Steelers now 3-6, have lost 4 in a row | CELTIK::JACOB | | Mon Nov 04 1991 20:27 | 38 |
| SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 3 7 0 3 13
Broncos 0 17 3 0 20
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS BRONCOS
19 first downs 17
31-146 rushes-yards 31-144
163 passing yards 130
18-33-1 compl-att-int 10-23-1
6-41 sacked-yards lost 1-10
6-42 punts 4-47
2-0 funbles-lost 3-1
6-91 penalties-yards 4-27
33:13 time of possession 26:47
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: Williams 11-63, Hoge 13-43, O'Donnell 4-37, Thompson 3-3.
Denver: Lewis 19-111, Elway 5-17, Humphrey 5-15, Sewell 2-1
PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 18-33-1int 1TD 204 yds
Denver: Elway 10-23-1int 1TD 140 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Lipps 5-81, Hoge 5-32, Green 3-34, Williams 2-20, Calloway 1-14,
Mularkey 1-12, Stone 1-11.
Denver: Jackson 3-54, Young 2-32, Kay 1-32, Russell 1-11, Sewell 1-6,
R.Johnson 1-4, Sharpe 1-1.
JaKe
|
35.334 | Neil will displace Brister from here to eternity | CELTIK::JACOB | | Mon Nov 04 1991 20:35 | 25 |
| Bright spots out of lasted nights game:
Neil O'Donnell looks destined to make Bubby Brister a second string QB,
which is where he(Brister) belongs.
Dark Spots:
Greg Lloyd gets involved in an altercation with Broncos tackle Ken
Lanier and gets flagged for 15 yards, Jerrol Williams gets flagged for
5 yards for delaying the game by moving the ball, Aaron Jones hits Mr.
Ed 6 feet out of bounds, when horse face was already on the ground, and
gets nailed for 15 yards. STUPID PENALTIES which cost the Steelers the
game.
The play calling on the final drive, once the Steelers got to the Conks
9 and had the ball 2nd and 1 to go, STUNK. 3 passes into the end zone,
when another yard further, and the Steelers would have had a first down
and had 4 tries to get it into the end zone. Dumb, just plain Dumb.
Greg Lloyd is quickly becoming a liability, instead of an asset. For
every sack he gets, he seems to give up more yardage in penalties for
late hits, or fighting, and it has hurt the Steelers.
Lasted night, dumb Steeler penalties cost the Steelers 10 points.
JaKe
|
35.335 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Mon Nov 04 1991 20:40 | 10 |
| One footnote to be added to .334
Neil O'Donnel's stats so far are as follows:
Compl Att Yds Int TD Compl % Long Compl
64 116 855 4 5 55.2 89
JaKe
|
35.336 | Can't wait to see ya grovel !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 05 1991 11:11 | 8 |
| Hey JaKe..... Only Seven more games to pull out a win !!
Do the Squeelers play the Dolts ??? Could be their only
prayer....
;^)
Big Game
|
35.337 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Nov 05 1991 12:05 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh has already beaten Indianapolis.
John
|
35.338 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 05 1991 13:51 | 9 |
|
Jake,
YOU NEVER SENT ME THE DOLLAR you lost to me last year... (I wanted
to post it next to the Dork Midwife BUCK I've got hanging in my
office)... anyways... want to make a friendly bet on who will
have a better record at the end of the season (browns or steelers)?
|
35.339 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:31 | 7 |
|
Thanks Ninj..... I guess I can't lose now !!
Big Game
P.s I'll have a question for ya in the QA note soon, hope you can
help!
|
35.340 | | CELTIK::JACOB | City of Chicago says,Vote Early,Vote Often | Tue Nov 05 1991 15:53 | 9 |
| Groaner,
As I stated in the mail message I sent you, grasp into the deep
recesses of your brain(if it's IN today), and remember the CHECK for $5
that I sent you and you CASHED lasted year after the Steelers failed to
meet the wagered upon record.
JaKe
|
35.341 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Chicago says, Vote Early & Often | Tue Nov 05 1991 16:24 | 15 |
| During Chuck Noll's weekly press conference yesterday, he said that ho
doesn't think that this team is that far away from being a championship
caliber team. HAHAHAHAHA.
He said that they just have to learn to win the close games. Right,
now tell me something I don't already know.
Noll also stated, when asked if he'll start playing the rookies to get
them some game experience, that the team will continue to play it's
best players and not give up on this season, and they will play to win
every game, regardless of what their record falls to. Oh well, guess
they'll win just enuf to be out of the hunt for a top player in the
draft nexted year.
JaKe
|
35.342 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Mon Nov 11 1991 02:32 | 22 |
| Great comeback by the Steelers yesterday at Riverfront to take the lead
with less than 2 minutes remaining in regulation time, after trailing
early, 17-3. They Take the lead with 1:30 left, 27-24, only to have
the Bungholes drive into Steeler territory and tie it up with a field
goal. In the OT, Greg Lloyd strips Ickey "Dancing Dork" Woods of the
ball and a couple of plays later, Neil O'Donnell hits a WIDE open Eric
Green for the game winner. O'Donnell hit 3 TD's in the game.
Jerroll Williams, LB, returned a Boomer Esiason fumble for a TD for the
Steelers first TD, then O'Donnell hit rookie wide receiver Ernie Mills
for a TD, and he also hit Louis Lipps for a score, on a play where
Lipps put forth a tremendous second effort to get into the end zone.
Ya know, after suffering thru Cliff Stoudt, Mark Malone, and Brister, I
hate to say this, but O'Donnell, though still making some mistakes due
to inexperience, looks 300% better than Brister ever has, and shows
beau coup poise under pressure.
I'll put the game stats in later on this evening, time permitting.
JaKe
|
35.343 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 11 1991 13:01 | 2 |
|
Have the Steelers beaten the Browns this year?
|
35.345 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Grin & Bear it or Bare It & Grin?? | Mon Nov 11 1991 15:56 | 6 |
| Kwak:
I concur whole-heartedly!!
JaKe
|
35.346 | No QB controversy here anymore!!! | CELTIK::JACOB | Grin & Bear it or Bare It & Grin?? | Mon Nov 11 1991 16:14 | 12 |
| FWIW
I don't have my paper in front of me but I think O'Donnell's stats
yesterday were as follows:
24-39 0 Interceptions, 3TD's, 309 yards. He threw his first 2 TD's in
the fourth quarter when he rallyed the Steelers from a 11 point
deficit, and threw the third in OT to Eric Green who held onto this
one.
JaKe
|
35.347 | They finally win one !! | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 11 1991 17:04 | 19 |
| It's nice to see the Steeler's get over the Cincinnati jinx and finally
win one in Riverfront stadium. How long has it been since they beat the
Bengal's ? How long since they won in Riverfront ?
I remember the last time they played each other. It was basically for the
Central divison championship and Bubby overthrew at least 2 or 3 wide
open receivers on critical plays. At that time I gave up on Brister. It's
good to see O'Donnell playing this well. I hope stays healthy and continues
to improve. I think he could be one of the better QB's in football. It's also
good to see one of the rookie receiver's finally get into the game and make
a big play(Ernie Mill's TD reception). The TD by Lipps shows why he's one
of the best money player's to ever wear a Steeler uniform. He's definately
in the same class as Swann and Stalworth. It's just too bad, he had QB's
like Malone and Brister throwing to him for most of his career.
With all of these good things said, I still don't think the Steeler's are
going anywhere until they get a better offensive line.
Keith
|
35.348 | Steelers !!!!! Best team in football !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 11 1991 18:48 | 18 |
| Absolutely incredible...... The Steelers have to be the come
back team of the year. What an incredible Defense !!! The
whole team played to the caliber that I always knew they could.
O'donnell is going to be a Hall of Fame QB and Woodson seems to have
put his cloudy past behind him and is playing Pro-Bowl football.
Joe Walton called the best game of his life and is only going to get
better and better as his tenure with the Steelers continues. I know
that the Jets watched this game and are kicking themselve for ever
letting this offensive genius go. I think that the Steelers are going
to be the team to beat as we progress through the 1990's. I can see
Chuck knoll putting together dynasty in Pitt that could very well
run rough shod over the rest of the NFL for years to come. I can't
say enough about how impressed I am with this team..... They are
heads and sholders above the Donks, no question about it !!
Go Steelers...
Big Game
|
35.349 | Steelers now 4-6 | CELTIK::JACOB | Grin & Bear it or Bare It & Grin?? | Mon Nov 11 1991 22:08 | 69 |
| SCORING SUMMARY
1 2 3 4 OT T
STEELERS 0 6 7 14 6 33
Cincy 10 7 0 10 0 27
Cincy--FG Breech 29 yds
Cincy--Woods 4 yd run(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 44 yd
Cincy--Holman 18 yd pass from Esiason(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 46 yd
STEELERS-J.Williams 38 yd fumble return
Cincy--Woods 1 yd run(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-Mills 35 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Lipps 12 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Cincy--FG Breech 47 yd
STEELERS-EricGreen 26 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS Cincy Bungholes
18 1st Downs 25
22-58 Rushes-yds 24-70
294 Passing Yds 336
24-39-0 Compl-Att-Int 32-43-1
2-15 Sacked-Yds Lost 3-25
6-42 Punts 4-43
1-0 Fumbles-Lost 3-2
5-40 Penalties-Yds 8-65
31:00 Time of Possession 35:32
A-55,503
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: Hoge 17-48, W.Williams 4-9, O'Donnell 1-1
Cincy: Brooks 15-35, Woods 7-33, H.Green 2-2
PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 24-39-0, 309 yds 3 TD's
Cincy: Esiason 32-43-1, 361 yds 1 TD
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Hoge 5-46, E.Green 4-50, Lipps 4-47, W.Williams 3-44, Stone 3-22,
Mills 2-65, Thompson 2-19, Calloway 1-16.
Cincy: Brown 10-98, Holman 7-87, Brooks 4-35, Woods 4-11, McGee 3-101,
Kattus 3-23, Barber 1-6.
One of the keys to the Steelers being able to come back in this game, IMHO, was
the ability of the defense to keep James Brooks and Ickey Woods from running
for beau coup yards. Brooks has, historically, been a Steeler killer, and has
had some of his best games .vs. the Steelers.
The Steeler victory was just the Steelers third win in Riverfront Stadium since
1979.
The Steelers QB comparison is as follows:
Compl Att Yds Compl Pct. Td Int
O'Donnell 88 155 1164 56.8 8 4
Brister 81 136 1053 59.6 6 7
WR Ernie Mills, a rookie, had his first career reception in the 3rd quarter, a
35 yd TD pass from O'Donnell. Mills also had a second reception, good for 30
yards, later in the game and a couple of plays later, Louis Lipps caught a 12
yard pass and with good second effort, got into the end zone for the TD which
temporarily put the Steelers up, 27-24.
JaKe
|
35.350 | Or is it just a virus? | SHALOT::MEDVID | From Lake Geneva... | Tue Nov 12 1991 07:58 | 10 |
| re: .348
Hey, Big Game, can you pass on the code so I can install the software
behind:
SET PROCESS/STYLE=HAL_INANE
That was great!
--dan'l
|
35.351 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Tue Nov 12 1991 10:34 | 4 |
|
So, Big Game. Who'd you lose a bet to?
Claybroon
|
35.352 | Impressive Steelers get DONK Fan K.O.D !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 12 1991 10:52 | 13 |
|
No one Clay Wad... I really feel that the Steelers are going to
be the team to beat in the `90s..... They have a promising defense,
a great QB and the Greatest coach to ever coach in the NFL behind
the almighty Vince of the GB Packers.... Look for the Steelers to
win the rest of their games this season and start 10-0 nexted(tm)
year
N O T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Big Game
|
35.353 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Tue Nov 12 1991 11:43 | 3 |
| The Steelers. One of my all-time favorite teams.
lEe
|
35.354 | Check your coffee | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Nov 12 1991 13:32 | 9 |
| Claybroon asked, and sooooo will I. Who did you lose the bet to
Jack? Ernie maybe?
You would never say this unless the price was right or you stuck your
foot in it;^^
Steelers sip and thats that!
Tim
|
35.355 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Grin & Bear it or Bare It & Grin?? | Tue Nov 12 1991 16:30 | 7 |
| I personally enjoy seeing Mr Hunter have such confidence in a real
team! (8^)* Tee-Hee, HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
Good notes, Big Game
JaKe
|
35.356 | I always payoff..... Even when it hurts ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:42 | 12 |
| Well,
I wasn't going to let the cat outta the bag but since JaKe has all
but said that I lost a bet to him I guess I can talk now. The bet
was that the Squeelers wouldn't win another game after the loss to
the Donks. Obviously the Tigers let me down and allowed an other-
wise happless bunch of bums sneak out a totaly undeserved win in
what could be called the luckiest game ever played.
;^)
Big Game
|
35.357 | A down-to-earth kind of guy | SHALOT::MEDVID | Naze koor fateeri | Fri Nov 15 1991 09:52 | 54 |
| A profile of Neal O'Donnell from "Steelers Digest"
==================================================
Birthday: July 3, 1966
Height: 6-3 Weight: 225
Position: QB
Born: Morristown, NJ
Current Home: Wexford, PA
Favorite Singer: Bruce Springsteen
Favorite TV Show: Cheers
Favorite Food: Chicken and pasta
Nickname: O'D
Make of Cars: 300ZX, Jimmy 4x4, Ford Explorer
Hobbies: Golf and biking
Favorite Pro Team: New York Knicks, Boston Celtics
Community Activities: Multiple Sclerosis, Make-A-Wish
Pet Peeves: People who chew with their mouth open.
If I Could Change One Thing About Myself: "I would find more time to be
by myself."
Toughest Thing ABout Being an NFL Player: Getting pumped up each week
after a tough loss.
What I Like Most About Pittsburgh: The people, the size and cost of
living in and around the city.
If I could Have Three Wishes: More wins, my golf game could use some
improvement, and a long, successful career with the Steelers.
People Would Be Surprised to Know That: "I'm the yougest of nine
children and I had eight different coaches in nine years of football --
four different in both high school and college."
My Strangest Moment In Football: "Calling my own plays my sophomore
year in high school. My coach had a heart attack on the sideline in
the second quarter. It was my first high school varsity start and we
didn't have an offensive coordinator or head coach."
Life After Football: Success and happiness.
|
35.358 | What brand of undies does he wear? | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:02 | 7 |
|
But gee, what's his fave color and what books is he currently reading?
I just gottsta know!
Steve
|
35.359 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:12 | 3 |
| I would think it'd betough being both a Knick and Celtic fan
|
35.360 | what the status of Foster | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:19 | 15 |
|
Any news on the Barry Foster injury ? What's his status for Sunday ?
You get the feeling that had preseason served it's true purpose,
Foster and O'Donnell would have started the season and therefore would
have long since gotten the bugs out of the O. Although there is an
appreciation for high draft picks, I don't think the steelers should
throw in the towel. At this point I think the skins are ripe for a
pickin. Big blowout over Atlanta, training camp buddies of the
steelers, and their on the road in what could be a hostile environment.
Granted the steelers haven't been playing great but these kinds of
games help to make seasons when things have been tough.
Roy L.
|
35.361 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:28 | 4 |
|
I just can't wait until they start showing O'Donnell parents on TV
during the Steelers games. That's probably what I miss most about
that STIFF Brister riding pine.
|
35.362 | Answers... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Naze koor fateeri | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:47 | 22 |
| RE: Foster
Foster practiced the week before the Cinci game and was listed as
probable. The week's worth of practice, however, put strain on the
ankle and he was downgraded to doubtful before the game. Foster is
being sent for a second medical opinion.
RE: Washington game
Remember that the Steelers were the only team to beat the 49ers in the
'84 season just when everyone was thinking they would go 16-0. Of
course, that Steelers team went to the AFC Championship game that year.
RE: Gronowski
Stop spewing Cuyahoga Crap. The networks haven't shown Brister's mom
in two years. It's an old joke. Give it up before you sound even more
jealous. And what you'll end up missing the most is not seeing his
mom, but the fact that with Brister the Steelers were an easy win for
the Browns. Now you actually have to face a quality QB.
--dan'l
|
35.363 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 15 1991 11:21 | 6 |
|
Funny how when Brister was the starting QB the Pittsburgh Boys
(Dan'l and Jake) were talking about how superior he was to Kosar.
... now that the guy is picking splinters its "...with Brister the
Steelers were an easy win for the Browns." WHAT NEXT?
|
35.364 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Nov 15 1991 13:03 | 4 |
| All those personals sounds like a brown nosing job to keep his job
and not be traded....
tim
|
35.365 | Statements without facts only serve to hurt you. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Naze koor fateeri | Fri Nov 15 1991 13:42 | 16 |
| > Funny how when Brister was the starting QB the Pittsburgh Boys
> (Dan'l and Jake) were talking about how superior he was to Kosar.
Paul, please repost a note where I ever said Brister was superior to
Kosar. Wait, I'll save you some time...and some face. Don't bother
looking, because I never said it.
I am on record, however, as saying Kosar is a good QB and I'd love to
have him on my team. Now let's just hope you can be man enough to
admit the same about O'Donnell if and when he attains his potential.
Oh, and congratulations on being able to type JaKe's name and not tag
it with slanderous personal attacks. You just might become a better
person than I thought was within your potential.
--dan'l
|
35.366 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 15 1991 13:53 | 8 |
|
Danny Boy, The Bowling Pin Man is JaKe's REAL NAME!
I will agree right now that O'Donnell is far superior to Brister.
The guy is big, has a strong arm and can run. The Steelers may
have found a gem in this guy.
|
35.367 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:57 | 23 |
| I would also like to challenge you, Mr Groanoutski, to find ANYWHERE,
where I've stated that Brister was a superior QB to Kosar. I only
ragged Bernice as bad as I have to tout Mr. whitehaid cause I got sick
of his "Bernice is the second coming". Guess Mack came first, eh??
Brister seemed to have all of this potential, yes potential, one word
that when tagged on a player, makes you watch and watch and wonder what
the f__k everybody sees that you don't. He has always been too
excitable and I personally got tired of waiting for him to develop
somewhere in the early stages of lasted season. The guy is a second
string QB and nothing more.
Brister was quoted as saying that if he's going to be the #2 QB nexted
year, he wants traded during the off-season to somewhere where he can
start. Does Bumfuct Egypt have a football team?????? (8^)*
Re your "SLUR, Mr Groanitout, you claim someone helse hung that on me,
but when you started using it, that certain someone had never even met
me. I first played football with him finally showing up lasted winter,
you started spewing the offensive slur at least 4 years ago.
JaKe
|
35.368 | ;^) " | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 15 1991 16:53 | 4 |
| Oughta turn out the lights on this topic and the Clowns...
After all the years over for both so called pro football teams!
Big Game
|
35.369 | Bring on Houston! I wanna be 4-8! | SHALOT::MEDVID | in which case: I'm doomed | Mon Nov 18 1991 07:55 | 17 |
| 4-7! Yeeeeehaaaaa! Go Steelers! And if they can lose to the Browns
one more time, they'll get an easier schedule next year to go along
with their high draft pick (which they will blow, of course).
Steelers were kilt 41-14 by the undefeated Redskins. Neil O'Donnell
still continues to impress. He made one big mistake by grounding the
ball to kill the clock...ON THIRD DOWN! That set up a 4th and long.
His long passes are pretty much pinpoint. But the great thing he has
over Brister is that he takes a look at his secondary receivers if the
primary one is covered. Brister never did that.
In watching this team in defeat, I noticed that they do have some very
good talent. It's the system that sucks. The offensive scheme can't
buy a first down and the defense is wide open for short passes that add
up to long drives. Why can't they figure that out?
--dan'l
|
35.370 | | CAM::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Mon Nov 18 1991 08:02 | 3 |
| �Why can't they figure that out?
Joe Walton.
|
35.371 | Groady | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:09 | 3 |
| Must be to busy deciding which nostril gets it next;^)
Tim
|
35.372 | skins pick/ pick skins ?? | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:24 | 14 |
| So much for the skins being ripe for the pickin' theory. That is
unless of course your referring to Joe nasal skins.
No running game is eventually going to get O'Donnell killed. The 2nd
and 3rd & longs let defense pin their ears back all day long. The OL
definitely needs some help as well.
The db's are doing such a bad job of tackling on the short passes and
just the sheer completion rates were enormous. They've tried to
compensate and now the are getting beat deep quite regularly. A lot
of that credit has to go to the defensive line though. They did apply
enough pressure to blow up a balloon.
Roy L.
|
35.373 | passed the bird please | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:30 | 6 |
|
If only Green would learn to concentrate better he again dropped some easy
balls. This offense needs Foster back bad...Defense needs a pass rusher...
I need some asprin...
mike
|
35.374 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:33 | 46 |
|
Really, is there a worse team in the league than the Steelers? If
there is, I haven't seen them.
The Steelers are so horrible that yesterday, CBS decided to cut
from the Steelers game which is the first time I can remember any
network doing so while the Steelers were playing in over 20 years
of watching them.
Again, same old, same old. Absolutely no offensive game plan at
all. Steeler's open up any series with a run, lose 2, then try two
passes which fail. Or they might get tricky and run on first and
second down, only to have 3rd and long. Game plan? What game plan?
Again they waste nearly a quarter and a half in getting the ball
to Eric Green. Hey Joe, throw Green the ball on the very first play
will ya! No draws, no screens, just terrible play calling. When
O'Donnell was being pressured so much, why didn't they try a screen
or a draw? This of course brings up another bright spot, the offensive
line. Amazing that these guys can even put their pads on correctly.
Hasselrigg (sp) never played football but yet he's one of the best they
have which don't say much for the other bodies impersonating football
players.
As for the defense, what defense? The front 4 or 3 or 5 or 2 or
whatever can't even get close to the QB. This in turn puts a great
deal of pressure on the LB's and corners which doesn't help. Pourous
is to kind a word for this defense.
This team is basically in a state of total disarray. They need
offensive line help, defensive line help, linebacker help and most of
all, some coaching help.
And yes, maybe it is time to say addios to Noll. All he has done
is hired a bunch of his old players who really haven't showed they can
coach, along with hiring the bafoon Walton who can't seem to develop
a game plan. Noll is still a decent coach, but maybe he has worn out
his welcome in Pittsburgh. Wait till next year just don't cut the
mustard anymore. Of course, I'm not a season ticket holder which
doesn't require me to plunk down 50-60 bucks everytime the Steeler's
are in town to see a bunch of ex-college dropouts so who am I to
complain?
Thank god for hoops season!
bill..g.
|
35.375 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:57 | 15 |
| re: 374
Bill, you hit the nail right on the head with your description
of the Steeler's in your last note. It was very painful watching the
first half of yesterday's game. How many times this season have they
converted a 3rd down play only to have it called back with a penalty ?
The team does have some excellent talent with Green, O'Donnell, Lipps,
Foster and Woodsen but they are not being utilized. The offensive line
may be the worst in pro football. Walton has been a complete disaster.
I've defended Noll all through the 80's but I'm beginning to think it's
time for him to retire and end a great coaching career, head up to the
front office and get an entirely new coaching staff made up of mostly
younger men than they have now.
Keith
|
35.376 | Will Connie Hawkins return ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | Too legit ! Too legit to quit ! | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:17 | 10 |
| re .374
> thank god for hoops season !
What's up Goose ? Did the Pittsburgh Pipers restart their francheise ?
I didn't hear about that one !
:-)
Doc
|
35.377 | Whadda fiasco yesterday was, EH???? | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Mon Nov 18 1991 15:58 | 6 |
| Would the person who left the 11 six year old boys at Three Rivers
Stadium please return to get them, they are beating the Steelers 35-3.
JaKe
|
35.378 | 41-14, mirror score | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Mon Nov 18 1991 16:27 | 33 |
| Lessee, the offense as a whole sucks, the defense as a whole sucks,
special teams are a fraction of an inch from sucking. Other than that,
the team is in pretty good shape.
O'Donnell, I agree with --dan'l, is one of the few bright spots on this
team. The guy really appears to have a clue as to what he's doing out
there. It's a shame that in this stage of learning, he had to face the
foreskins yesterday. He was sacked, what, 5, 6, maybe 7 times????
The offensive line couldn't keep my grandmother from getting to him,
AND SHE'S BEEN DEAD SINCE 1976!!!!!!
The defense is one HUGE dissapointment. Lasted year they were first in
the AFC, this year, they're trying to become a doormat. They tried to
put pressure on Rypien, but he still seemed to have all day, even when
the Steelers blitzed. The Foreskins, on the other hand, when they
blitzed they were on O'Donnell faster than sh!t.
O'Donnell has a few dumb mistakes to learn from, as --dan'l said, the
spike on 3rd and whatever with 1:09 left. Or the interception he threw
while trying to get the ball to Eric Green. But overall, I'd rate his
performance as a B-. Eric Green gets a C, at best, as he continues to
drop some balls that MUST be caught.
Oh well, 4-7, same as the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm), and on their way
to a high-priced draft pick.
As to the assertion that the Steelers are the worst team in the league,
I don't agree, Indy is worse, Wicky-Wacky's Bungholes are worse.
That's about it though, but there are some teams playing on the same
level as the Steelers, (See Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm))
JaKe
|
35.379 | FBI WARNING !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 18 1991 19:20 | 7 |
| re .377
Hey.... !!! You owe royalities JaKe.... Thats an old Donk Line !
;^)
Big Game
|
35.380 | Royalties, Shmoyalties | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Mon Nov 18 1991 20:02 | 8 |
| Nah, Big Game, it's been used here in Pittsburgh since the early '80's,
plus I've seen it used in numerous different cities, so blow the
royalties out your.....well you know where.
(8^)* (8^0*
JaKe
|
35.381 | A dismal 4-7, headed to 4-12, or 5-11 | CELTIK::JACOB | One of Several Possible Musiks | Mon Nov 18 1991 22:47 | 79 |
| Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
Washington 7 10 10 14 41
STEELERS 0 0 0 14 14
Wash-Riggs 1 yd run(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-FG Lihmiller 36 yd
Wash-Monk, 11 yd pass from Rypien(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-FG Lohmiller 41
Wash-Riggs 1 yd run(Lohmiller PAT)
STEELERS-Cooper 5 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Stone 40 pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Wash-Clark 49 yd pass from Rypien(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-Sanders 40 pass from Rutledge(Lohmiller PAT)
TEAM STATS:
Washington STEELERS
23 first downs 16
37-97 rushes-yards 14-41
365 Passing yards 241
22-29-0 Compl-Att-Int 23-36-1
0-0 Sacked-yards lost 5-48
1-42 Punts 5-36
2-0 Fumbles-lost 1-1
3-28 Penalties-yards 7-54
37:05 Time of Possession 22:55
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING
Washington: Ervins 23-84, Riggs 5-8, Byner 9-5,
STEELERS: Hoge 7-29, Thompson 1-4, O'Donnell 2-4, Foster 4-4
PASSING:
Washington: Rypien 21-28-0-325 yds, Rutledge 1-1-0-40 yards
STEELERS: O'Donnell 23-36-1-289
RECEIVING
Washington: Monk 8-130, Sanders 4-67, Clark 3095, Byner 3-37, Ervins 3-25,
Warren 1-11.
STEELERS: Green 6-73, Stone 4-84, Lipps 4-59, Calloway 4-47, Thompson 2-9,
Hoge 2-2, Cooper 1-5.
NOTES:
A comparison of lasted years Steeler defense at the same point in the season:
Category 1990 1991
3rd down conversions allowed .395 .487
Total yards 257.2 326.7
Passing yards 156.3 220.9
Passing percentage .513 .659
Passer rating 54.3 93.6
td-interceptions 9-24 16-8
Points per game 15 24.5
Bubby Brister has said that he has maintained his friendship with O'Donnell,
but "hopefully I can beat him out later on if the job's open." Noll, however,
gave no indication that it will be open.
Yesterday's game was the 7th consecutive game in which the Steelers failed to
generate a 100 yard rusher or a 100 yard receiver. It was the 9th consecutive
game that a runner failed to get 100. Barry Foster's 121 yards against Buffalo
was the teams only 100+ yard rushing performance of the season.
Dwight Stone and Eric Green both had 100 yard receiving performances in
September.
The Steelers' QB numbers so far this season
Compl-Att Yards %age TD InT
O'Donnell 111-194 1453 57.2 10 5
Brister 81-136 1053 59.6 6 7
JaKe
|
35.382 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 19 1991 10:31 | 3 |
| I still say ewe owe me some Bucks $$$$$
Big Game
|
35.383 | | CELTIK::JACOB | One of Several Possible Musiks | Tue Nov 19 1991 15:55 | 16 |
| Lessee, back in .311 I made some predictions on how the Steelers would
do for the rest of the season, here's how the predictions are holding
up:
Predicted Actual result
Brown(spot)s(tm) win 24-10 'Spots won 17-14
Donks win 31-13 Donks won 20-13
Steelers over Bungholes, 21-20 Steelers won, 33-27
Washington win 42-3 Washington won, 41-14
the scores weren't all that correct but the W/L predictions are 4-0.
If this keeps up, the Steelers wmay finish the season 6-9-1, although I
now see the Steelers finishing either 4-12 or 5-11, at best.
JaKe
|
35.384 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Pgh Surf & Turf=Carp and Kolbassi | Fri Nov 22 1991 16:35 | 7 |
| Dere's a QB controversy brewing here in PGH. I got an article on
Brister being pretty PO'd about not getting his starting job back and
I'll put it in here later if'n I git the chance.
JaKe
|
35.385 | He's Out Classed, Out Gunned and Out Of A JOB ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 16:48 | 9 |
|
Screw the Bum..... Let him go cry to his mommy about it....
she is at every game you know !!
I say make him get his job back the old fashion way....
EARN IT !!!
Big Game
|
35.386 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Pgh Surf & Turf=Carp and Kolbassi | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:06 | 10 |
| The laugh is, he says he "held this team together" over the lasted 4
years and doesn't deserve to lose the starting job the way he did. He
says he's not a second string QB. I agree, he's a practice squad QB.
He thinks he'll be able to go somewhere else and be ushered into a
starting job, no questions asked.
I say send him and his mommy into the WLAF!!!
JaKe
|
35.387 | Oilers still have never won a division title | SHALOT::MEDVID | Wild-Hearted Son | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:00 | 23 |
| Warren Moon has the worst day of his career (5 INTs).*
Steelers make very few mistakes.
Pittsburgh's backup monster tightend Adrian Cooper (R, Oklahoma) fills
void left by Eric Green (broken ankle).
Neil O'Donnell actually has time to pass the ball...and does well.
Merrill Hoge runs with talent AND brains.
Houston players take one too many cheap shots.
Steelers find a pass rush, Craig Veasey in particular.
29�, snow, and wind.
All add up to Steelers victory, 26-14.
--dan'l
*If Moon was on, Steelers lose this game. All other factors
negligible.
|
35.388 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Don't drink the Koolaid | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:08 | 4 |
| I hope they can play like that on Thursday.
Dennis
|
35.389 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Mon Nov 25 1991 11:20 | 4 |
| Snow and cold huh? Sounds like the wimpy dome team couldn't handle
it;^)
Tim
|
35.390 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Too legit ! Too legit to quit ! | Mon Nov 25 1991 11:48 | 7 |
| Sounds like three straight heart-stoppers were too much,a nd finally
caught up to the Oilers this week. Since I had to watch the hated
Cowboys beat Washington, could someone fill me in on the details ?
Thanks,
doc
|
35.391 | From what I can remember between pitchers | SHALOT::MEDVID | Wild-Hearted Son | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:41 | 39 |
| I'm sure JaKe will post the stats, Doc, if he's not on vacation this
week (like a lot of people).
There's no way I would have bet against the Oilers yesterday what with
Rod Woodson and Eric Green out for the Steelers. I'm glad I'm not a
betting man.
Moon was just awful. He was throwing the ball into the ground, over
heads, and for the most part where there were no receivers. He wasn't
helped much by a perfectly thrown ball that hit Jeffries right in the
facemask in the endzone and bounced away. That would have changed the
game with about eight minutes to play.
The Steelers scored most of their points on drives in which the defense
had given them the ball. Pittsburgh still had trouble getting the ball
into the endzone, but Joe Walton's offense seemed to be confusing the
hell out of the Oilers. Merrill Hoge and Barry Foster (until he
reinjured the ankle) were picking up good ground yardage. Adrian Cooper
was a huge offensive threat; Steelers didn't even miss Eric Green.
Dwight Stone is becoming O'Donnell's receiver of choice (though the
double team on Lipps probably has a lot to do with that). Stone made a
great catch on a great 50-yard toss for a TD that was the beginning of
the end for Houston.
Pittsburgh's secondary was still wide open for short passes. Like I
said, if Moon was on the Oilers would have won. Instead, he was
throwing right into coverage and got picked five times. A lot had to
do with the Steelers' pass rush which it looked like Houston hadn't
prepared for. Craig Veasey and Greg Lloyd were all over Moon during
some of his poorer passing moments.
But the big turning point came when O'Donnell was intercepted in the
fourth quarter. The Oilers could have pulled within three. Instead,
Moon threw his fifth interception to player-of-the-game Shawn Vincent
on the very next play. Vincent ran it back to mid-field and the
Steelers were able to score again.
--dan'l
|
35.392 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Pgh Surf & Turf=Carp and Kolbassi | Mon Nov 25 1991 16:00 | 26 |
| Nah, --dan'l, I'm here this week. UNFORTUNATELY!!!!
I'll get the game stats and scoring summary in tonite, given the
chance.
Also got a good "Gene Collier" column on the Oilers losing colely
because of "field position"( the field played in wasn't positioned in
Houston, ya know the one, the 9 acre controlled environment where they
win). Also a good Collier on Bear Hunting.
O'Donnell didn't have a stellar performance, completion percentage in
the 40%'s, 1 td 1 int. The cold was accompanied by some gusty winds
which helped secondaries from both teams yesterday, making some passes
sail long, and some dive short. The Steelers found some semblance of a
pass rush, which suprized the sh_t out of me. I still look for the
Steelers to end up, at best, 6-10 this year. My prediction fo teh
Oilslicks winning yesterday fell short, but it's a bittersweet
victory. The Steelers get a win, but drop in the "draft pick" race.
What was yesterday, BLACK SUNDAY?????????????? Suprised to see all 6
division leaders fall.
More later
JaKe
|
35.393 | Steelers 5-7 and going nowhere | CELTIK::JACOB | Fork It | Mon Nov 25 1991 20:01 | 44 |
| SCORING SUMMARY
1 2 3 4 T
Houston 0 7 0 7 14
STEELERS 6 10 7 3 26
STEELERS-FG Anderson 20 yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 28 yd
Oilers-Givins 10 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 33 yd
STEELERS-Stone 43 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Williams 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Oilers-Jeffires 15 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 24 yd
A-45,795
TEAM STATISTICS:
Houston STEELERS
21 1st Downs 16
17-24 Rushes-Yds 39-139
307 Passing Yds 155
24-48-5 Compl-Att-Int 12-29-1
2-17 Sacked-Yds lost 1-0
3-42 Punts 4-39
4-1 Fumbles-Lost 1-1
5-50 Penalties-Yds 5-49
27:50 Time of Possession 32:10
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Oilers: Pinkett 7-18, White 6-9, Moon 3-2, Givins 1-(-5)
STEELERS: Foster 16-60, Hoge 13-54, W.Williams 5-15, O'Donnell 3-9, Stone 1-2,
Thompson 1-(-1).
PASSING:
Oilers: Moon 24-48, 5 ints, 2 tds 324 yds
STEELERS: O'Donnell 12-29, 1 int 1 td 155 yds
RECEIVING:
Oilers: Jeffires 8-122, Duncan 5-62, Givins 4-48, White 4-39, Hill 3-53
STEELERS: Cooper 3-35, Lipps 3-24, Stone 2-48, Hoge 2-22, Cash 1-20, Graham
1-6.
JaKe
|
35.394 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Fork It | Mon Nov 25 1991 20:36 | 29 |
|
The Steelers win was the first win against a team with a winning record
in the last 11 chances, totalling a span of 728 days.
The Steelers came up with more turnovers(6) than they had in their
previous six games(5).
Aaron Jones latest temper tantrum didn't draw any flags from the
officials, but it drew harsh words from head coach Chuck Noll, and
assistant coaches Joe Greene and George Stewart. Jones, frustrated,
smashed his helmet against Gary Anderson's helmet, brakeing Anderson's
single bar face mask during Houston's fourth qtr TD drive.
The door to the AFC Central division title still runs through
Pittsburgh after all. It might be splintered and barely standing, but
once again, the Oilers couldn't knock it down.
The Oilers are assured of no worse than a tie for the AFC Central div
title, with four games left and a four game lead over the Steelers and
Brown(spot)s(tm).
Thomas Everett got a gameball for his two interceptions, but he could
also have deserved a kick in the backside. Both interceptions came on
fourth down plays, and both were inside the Steelers' 20 yard line when
he picked them off. Had he knocked them down instead of catching them,
the Steelers would have gotten good field position in both cases.
JaKe
|
35.395 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 26 1991 11:11 | 6 |
|
Jake, I saw that on the sports channel lasted(tm) night, I couldn't
beleive the guy actually grabbed those INT's... Oh well I suppose
you get a little excited in the heat of the moment.
Big Game
|
35.396 | Now I'm confused but I'm pretty sure this is it... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Wild Hearted Son | Wed Nov 27 1991 16:07 | 19 |
| JaKe, to answer your Q over in the Browns note, I'm pretty darn sure it
was Malone.
It was the 1984-85 season. I was a senior at Ohio U. Pittsburgh was
the only team to beat SF that year and they were thinking it would be a
great matchup in the Super Bowl.
The Steelers D won it against Denver. I remember a crucial
interception by somebody that sealed it. Then Pittsburgh went down to
Miami and played them tough until Marino took the defense apart in the
second half. Malone couldn't move the offense either.
I'm pretty sure it had to be Malone because that was one of the things
that kept him around well past his time. People kept bringing up that
he took the team one game short of the Super Bowl in '85.
The USFL was in full swing by '85 and Stoudt was playing in Birmingham.
--dan'l
|
35.397 | Moved this to the Steelers Note | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Wed Nov 27 1991 17:23 | 40 |
| All dem years "in decline" seem to run together nowadays seeing as the
team is sucking the scum water in the bottom of the barrel right
now(and for the lasted 5 years+).
I think Stoudt played one year after Bradshaw left and then handed the
reigns over to either Malone or David Woodley, both of whom had short
undistinguished careers as Steeler starting QB's.
Anyroad, I know O'Donnell is young and prone to the woes that have
plagued the Steelers with QB's since Terry B. retired, BUT, and that's
a huge plate-stacker quality BUT, of all the starting QB's that have
gone thru the Steelers' revolving door, O'Donnell has the best arm, and
he shows more poise than any of them have at the same point in their
career. O'Donnell, before lasted week, was 3rd in the AFC passing, and
5th overall in the NFL. Not bad for his "rookie" year. I use the word
rookie because he missed training camp lasted year altogether, then
signed somewhere near midpoint in the season, and got to do a whole lot
of nothing. He didn't take a snap until the pre-season games this
year(against any competition), and fared rather well, He took over for
Brister and, though his completion percentage is lower than Brister's
is for THIS year, he has better yardage, plus 11 TD's against 6 int's,
whilst Brister has 6 TD's vs. 7 int's. O'Donnell is 2-3 as a starter,
but those three losses have come during fine performances on
O'Donnell's part, whilst the defense missed the games totally.
O'Donnell has a lot to learn, like when to throw the ball away, but he
throws deep better than Brister, he hangs in the pocket better than
Brister, he keeps his cool better than Brister, he got some tangible
college experience, while Brister played football exactly 1 year in
college, while opting for baseball instead.
Maybe in a couple of words I'll have to eat these words, and I'll
gladly do so if I'm wrong, but I think O'Donnell will be able to stand
with the Marinos, the Kellys, and the Montanas of this league when he
gets some experience under his hat. The guy has a great arm, reads the
defense awful well(so far), is big(6'3", 215+ lbs.), and just seems to
play sh!tloads better than anyone in Pittsburgh(consistently) over the
past 8-9 years.
JaKe
|
35.398 | Info from the official guide | SHALOT::MEDVID | Wild Hearted Son | Wed Nov 27 1991 18:11 | 25 |
| One more thing I remember about the Steelers '84 win over the 49ers is
that I didn't get to see it. Going to school in southeastern Ohio, I
still got to see all the Steelers games broadcast out of Parkersburg, WV
(Steelers Country). However, that day the game was pre-empted by the
MLB playoff game. I was majorly POed.
Here's what I can piece together from the Steelers Media guide:
- date of the win against SF was 10-14-84, Steelers won 20-17, and
their record that year was 9-7, good enough to win the AFC
Central.
- 12-30-84 Steelers beat Broncos in Denver, 24-17, in the AFC
Divisional Playoff.
- 1-6-85 Steelers lost to Dolphins in Miami, 45-28, in AFC
Championship.
- Mark Malone was with the Steelers from 80-87.
- Cliff Stoudt was with the team from 77-83.
Go Steelers. Beat Dallas tomorrow!
--dan'l
|
35.399 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Wed Nov 27 1991 20:38 | 27 |
| from The Pittsburgh Press, 11-26-1991
by
Bob Smizik
-It isn't just the so-called negative print media that has been
critical fo the Steelers. Even supreme loyalist Myron Cope of WTAE has
jumped on the Steeelers bashing bandwagon. In the Nov. 23 issue of
Steelers Digest, Cope wrote, "The players are not playing, the coaches
are not getting them to play and the ownership for too many years has
demonstrated a complacency that leaves this franchise seemingly
disinterested in improving its roster with astute, aggressive signings
of Plan B free agents and trades. Front office paralysis translates
into paralysis on the field, and now the Steelers have paralysis all
over the place and little more than the hope of occasionally winning
close over a fellow stiff."
-As it looks more and more like the Steelers will go with Neil
O'Donnell as their quarterback, they have a luxury not many teams have:
a backup QB with decent credentials and plenty of experience. They
wouldn't want trade Bubby Brister for just anybody because a team needs
two good QB's. But if the offer is attractive, the Steelers should
listen. With all of their glaring needs, not to do so would be
foolish.
JaKe
|
35.400 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Dec 02 1991 07:51 | 3 |
| Why do the Steelers have those cars parked along side the field at
Three Rivers?
Denny
|
35.401 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:56 | 11 |
| Cause stadium parking sucks at 3 Rivers!!!
(8^)*
Actually, your guess is as good as mine, but one of them is some kind
of Chrysler or another and is designated as the official "car" of the
Pettsburgh Steelers. Seems right that it's a Chrysler with the
Steelers, both are in the sh!thole!!!!
JaKe
|
35.402 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:17 | 26 |
| Dem Steelers sucked BIG TIME .vs. the DallAss Cryboys on Turkey day.
20-10 loss, the bozos should lose the rest of their games and go for
the higher picks in the draft, but, as usual, they'll get somebody,
he'll hold out for 6-10 weeks, Noll will say the guy has no chance to
help the team, the guy will then proceed to play and play great, then
the nexted year he'll break his leg or arm or get nailed for cocaine or
smack up his car and get paralyzed or just stink the joint up. Why
not, that's what happens to all of the other Steelers' #1's.
O'Donnell didn't look very good Thursday, but then neither did the rest
of the team. The offense stunk, the defense stunk, too, but not quite
as bad, the special teams stunk, Dermonti Dawson ESPECIALLY, with the
lousy snaps. Gary Anderson's miss on the 50+ yard field goal attempt
was the worst I've EVER seen him kick a ball, MAJOR SHANK!!
Lessee, when will Chuck Noll get fired??????
Should be this week, but knowing the way Dan Rooney exercises his
strangle hold on the Steelers it'll be just after the season ends,
In 2015, after the Steelers 15th consecutive non-winning season. And
only then because Noll refuses to sign over his Social Security
payments to the team.
JaKe
|
35.403 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Mon Dec 02 1991 22:01 | 48 |
| SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 0 3 7 10
Cowboys 7 3 0 10 20
Cowboys--E.Smith 6 yd run(Willis PAT)
Cowboys--FG Willis 19 yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 42 yd
Cowboys--FG Willis 43 yd
STEELERS-W.Williams 3 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Cowboys--Irvin 66 yd pass from Beuerlein(Willis PAT)
A-62,253
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Dallas
17 1st Downs 20
21-65 Rushes-yds 35-116
134 passing yds 181
17-36-0 Compl-Att-Int 14-25-0
3-33 Sacked-Yds Lost 4-36
4-39 Punts 2-38
3-1 Fumbles-lost 0-0
6-50 Penalties-Yds 2-29
25:45 Time of Possession 34:15
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: W.Williams 8-59, Hoge 9-9, O'Donnell 1-1, Stryzinski 2-0, Foster
1-(-4).
Dallas: E.Smith 32-109, Johnston 2-8, Beuerlein 1-(-1).
PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 17-36-0 167 yds.
Dallas: Beuerlein 14-25-0 217 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Lipps 5-54, Williams 4-33, Stone 3-39, Cooper 2-18, Cash 2-15, Hoge
1-8.
Dallas: Irvin 8-157, E.Smith 3-19, martin 1-23, Awalt 1-12, Roberts 1-6.
JaKe
|
35.404 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Mon Dec 02 1991 22:17 | 25 |
| Was it just me or did Jeff Graham, rookie wide receiver and 1st round
pick, give up on a VERY catchable ball on the far sideline lasted
Thursday???? O'Donnell threw to Graham on a fly pattern, only to have
the ball barely graze off of Graham's SLIGHTLY outstretched arms. A
little dive froward would have made the ball extremely catchable. If
it had been Lynn Swann or John Stallworth, some sort of move other than
just letting the ball fall JUST in front of the receiver would have
been made. I now question Graham's ability to stand up and be counted
as a bona-fide pro wide receiver. The guy ain't showed me much before
this game, but he showed me even less during the game. Another #1
draft pick gone bust.
FWIW, Chuck Noll said that if things keep going the way they are, he
may "get on with his life" after the season is over if that's what is
required of him. I think he's hinting at the fact that he'll retire
if asked to, or possibly move up into the front office. There was a
time that I thought Noll sat up there near God, but lately, with the
teams he is fielding, I think it's time to say so long Chuckie baby,
it's been real, then go out and hire some young coahc with some
innovative ideas, and get on with the business of returning to winning
form.
JaKe
|
35.405 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Mon Dec 02 1991 22:22 | 27 |
| TRIVIA INVOLVING THE STEELERS(answers at end)
1.) What do the following have in common?????
a) Man inventing the wheel
b) Dinosaurs becoming extinct
c) Democrats winning the White House
d) The Steelers winning the AFC Central Division
2.) What's a big play???
3.) What's special about the Steelers' special teams????
4.) Why do Steeler fans paint "J_E Must Go" banners????
Answers:
1.) They're all ancient history
2.) Something the other teams make
3.) They're especially bad
4.) There's no "O" in Steelers.
JaKe
|
35.406 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Dec 03 1991 13:24 | 4 |
| If Chuck retires, does this mean the nose man gets the directors
chair?
Tim
|
35.407 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 03 1991 15:10 | 6 |
| If so... The Steelers won't see a winning season till JaKe
buys the team and fires the gold digger himself !!
;^0
Big Game
|
35.408 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Tue Dec 03 1991 15:55 | 9 |
| MeThinks if Da Emperor Chas. Noll leaves, most of the coaching staff
will be gonzo as soon as whoever gets the head job gets the go ahead to
hire his own assistants. MeAlso Thinks that J_E B__GER WALT_N will be
pounding the pavement looking for a job, maybe even being the Offensive
Coordinator for Dr. Midwife's fag, er I mean Flag football team!!
JaKe
|
35.409 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Wed Dec 04 1991 21:08 | 50 |
| More on Noll and retirement.
Noll was asked at his Monday press conference if he plans to retire
after this season. He replied that he would step aside at the end of
the season if asked to do so.
Dan Rooney, Steelers President, declined to discuss the subject with
rreporters.
Tom Donahoe, the Steelers director of football development, said Noll
would be evaluated at the end of the season, just like every other
coach on the staff.
This was the first time Noll addressed questions about his future, but
not the first time he has been asked them.
In Oct. '88, after the Steelers started 1-6, Noll was asked at his news
conference if he would consider resigning at the end of the season.
Noll laughed and cut off the reporter saying, "I won't even answer that
question," and then abruptly walked out of the room. The Steelers
finished 5-11 that season. The next season they came within 2 points
of acvancing to the AFC Championship game. Noll was selected AFC Coach
of the year in 1989.
Monday, while asked some questions about his future, he was asked if he
plans to return next year, to which he replied, "That's something we'll
talk about after this is all over."
Noll has maintained since training camp that the Steelers have
championship talent and have more talent than the 1989 team that lost
to the Broncos, 24-23. With 3 games remaining, the Steelers are 5-8
and are looking at a slimn possibility of finishing .500 at the very
best. Noll said that this has been the most disappointing of his 23
seasons with the Steelers.
Noll: "It has because I had real high aspirations for this team. I
thought we could get done what we had to and overcome the problems you
would have through a year."
If the Steelers lose their final 3 games, they would finish with a 5-11
record, same as in 1988 when Rooney ordered Noll to fire several
assistant coaches at the end fo the season. Noll balked and nearly
resigned in protest, but eventually agreed.
Noll dodged a question Monday when asked about his staff's performance,
"When you've lost as many games as we've lost, the blame comes right
here, on me. And I'm the only one that has to answer for it."
JaKe
|
35.410 | O'Donnell's got to go! | SHALOT::MEDVID | Steeeempy, you eeeediot! | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:02 | 14 |
| Ohmagawd!!! I just realized something. Neil O'Donnell cannot be
allowed to start anymore for the Steelers. Before Brister got injured,
the four starting QBs in the AFC Central were named:
Warren
Norman
Bernie
Walter
Neil has just too normal a first name to be allowed to continue at QB in
this division. Sorry, Neil.
--dan'l
|
35.411 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fat, Dumb, and Happy!!! | Mon Dec 09 1991 15:53 | 23 |
| The Steelers were so bad in the House of the Braindead yesterday,
Brister refused to play in the fourth quarter. It seems that with the
score, 24-6, J_e Walt_n told Brister to warm up 'cause he was going in.
Brister promptly refused saying he was no rookie needing playing time
and also that O'Donnell wasn't hurt so nothing could be accomplished by
him going in. Brister then said he didn't want to go ninto a
game(unless O'Donnell got hurt) unless the score was 0-0.
Noll said he understood the reason Brister didn't want to go in late
was his knee was too stiff and sore. Brister has also sasid he will
not sign a contract with the Steelers unless he will be a starter.(this
is the lasted year of Brister's contract)
O'Donnell made almost all of the mistakes that a developing QB can
make. Fumbles, throwing into a crowd, going OB when the 1st donw stick
is a dive away. I still feel that this kid is the future of the
Steelers offense, though. Just gotta work the inexperience out of him.
5-9 and headed for a high draft pick, although I see the Steelers MAYBE
beating the Bungholes or the BrownTurds in one of the final two games.
JaKe
|
35.412 | That's got to be it for Chuck, sorry to say | SHALOT::MEDVID | sing your life | Mon Dec 09 1991 16:26 | 20 |
| >Just gotta work the inexperience out of him.
Well, with the way the offensive line lets the defense pour into the
backfield, O'Donnell should be worked enough to be experienced and
heading for retirement by week 16.
The game was televised here in Charlotte after a viewer pole pre-empted
the Browns-Broncos game because more people called in for the
Steelers-Oilers. How embarrasing!
And the worst part is, by the end of the third quarter I was wanting to
watch Denver beat up on Cleveland instead.
I'm not one for "ifs" and "buts" like Hal, "but if" Lewis Lipps doesn't
fumble that ball after the second quarter catch, I think the Steelers
would have won. That play took them out of the game mentally.
Actually, I'm not convinced he ever had possession...but who cares now?
We're going for the high draft pick!
--dan'l
|
35.413 | Steelers 5-9 headed for 5-11 or 6-10, Bye Chuck | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fat, Dumb, and Happy!!! | Mon Dec 09 1991 20:25 | 42 |
| SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 3 3 0 6
Houston 7 3 7 14 31
Hou-Pinkett 7 yd run(Del Greco PAT)
Hou-FG Del Greco 24yd
PGH-FG Anderson 54 yd
Hou-Jeffires 16 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
PGH-FG Anderson 36 yd
Hou-Pinkett 11 yd run(Del Greco PAT)
Hou-A.Smith 70 yd fumble return(Del Greco PAT)
A=59,225
TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS Houston
14 1st Downs 23
23-85 Rushes-Yards 22-117
147 Passing Yds 233
16-30-1 Compl-Att-Int 24-38-1
7-41 Sacked-Yds Lost 3-23
6-44 Punts 4-47
4-3 Fumbles-lost 3-1
8-62 Penalties-Yards 5-40
30:02 Time of Possession 29:58
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: W.Williams 4-39, Thompson 10-23, Hoge 8-18, O'Donnell 1-5.
Houston: Pinkett 16-98, White 2-21, Moon 1-0, Carlson 1-(-2).
PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 16-30-1 int 0tds, 188 yards
Houston: Moon 23-36-1, 1 TD, 254 yards, Carlson 1-2-0 4 yards
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Lipps 6-71, Thompson 6-67, Cooper 3-41, Hoge 1-9.
Houston: Hill 8-97, Jeffires 6-77, Givins 5-44, Pinkett 2-4, Coleman 1-4.
JaKe
|
35.414 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fat, Dumb, and Happy!!! | Mon Dec 09 1991 20:32 | 29 |
| --dan'l, i gotta agree with ya to an extent on the Lipps fumble.
Although I think he caught it, if he doesn't fumble the ball, I think
the Steelers make a game of it. It did seem to take the wind out of
their sails, though.
Gary Anderson's 54 yards field goal, which would have gone through from
60+ yards, was the second longest in Steeler history, with the longest
being 55 yards by Anderson on Nov 24, 1984.
Anderson's 2 field goals yesterday made him just the 19th player in NFL
history to go over 1,000 career points.
Rookie WR Jeff Graham made a couple of BONEHAID plays. The first in
fielding a punt at the 7 which probably would have gone into the
endzone. The second in signalling for a fair catch and then running
with the ball, drawing a penalty which backed the Steelers up within
their own 5 yard line. I don't know, but Graham is a first round pick
and he looks like SH!T to me. The guy hasn't shown me anything to be
hopeful about, either.
The roughing the passer call on Jerrol Williams was the biggest crock
of horse manure i've ever seen. Moon had JUST released the ball and
Williams, who was already airborne, knocks Moonie out of bounds and
gets flagged for roughing, and the drive stays alive and the Oilscum
score a few plays later.
JaKe
|
35.415 | Stats aren't everything, but.... | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Dec 10 1991 05:55 | 5 |
| Looking at the stats, it seems the turnovers and sacks killed the
sqeelers. I didn't see the game, but when you have those types of
problems, you will normally lose....
Tim
|
35.416 | 5-11 wouldn't bring me tears!! | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Tue Dec 10 1991 09:42 | 12 |
|
Jake,
Isn't Graham a number 2 round pick. Richardson being #1. I think
Lloyd and Williams are developing well at the outside linebacker
positions. The DLman out of Washington sounds a winner to me but I am
sure he won't be available at the steeler pick. Steelers should be
able to get something for Brister the way the nfl is hurting for
quarterbacks. He actually did look good in the simplified offensive
scheme of Tom Moore. The OL has looked horrid the last two games.
Roy L.
|
35.417 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fat, Dumb, and Happy!!! | Tue Dec 10 1991 15:35 | 16 |
| Yeah, Roy, come to think of it Graham is a second rounder, but still
looks like a SLOF, IMHO.
Re Brister
Noll, as of his news conference didn't know about Brister's "refusal",
an said he thought Brister's knee was bothering him. Noll said he
would be scheduling a meeting with Brister immediately to resolve the
matter. When asked if Brister would be disciplined or fined, Noll said
no, that his speaking out is part of his freedom of speech protected by
the first amendment. He did say, though, that it looks like O'Donnell
will be the starter for the lasted two games of the season here in Pgh,
against the Bungholes and the BrownTurds.
JaKe
|
35.418 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Dasher, Dancer, Donner and BLITZED!! | Wed Dec 11 1991 22:09 | 45 |
| Word has it that Tim Worley will be activated for Sunday's game against
the Cincy Bungholes.
Terry Long is not expected to be activated.
Noll had his meeting with Brister yesterday over Brister's comments and
refusal to warm up and go in the drudgery in the a$$h_ledome. The
meeting, it was reported, lasted less than 5 minutes and Noll said
afterward it was a 2-way meeting, and not a good old a$$-chewing.
Warren Williams, who carried the ball only 4 times but ran for 39
yards, had been sick with the flu earlier in the week and left the game
after becoming sick. Williams, IMHO, other than when he had his bout
with fumble-itis, is one good running back who, when called upon toi
fill the void left by injury/suspension, always seems to come thru.
Over his career, Williams averages 1 TD for every 14 times he gets the
ball, pass or run.
I know I've been down on Worley earlier this season, BUT, I truly hope
the guy turns his life around and keeps himself on the right path. An
article here in Pittsburgh about Worley(the wife threw it out, dammit)
qouted him as saying he was crying out for help while hooked on the
booze and cocaine. I truly believe it must be hard to step into the
limelight and have all those HUGE expectations dropped on your back.
First he holds out, gets the big bucks, then comes in and runs good for
a while, then develops fumble-itis, gets hurt, gets suspended during
training camp for drugs(unpublicized by the league cause he was a first
time offender), has a business that is in financial deep do-do and
being investigated, loses starting(and second string) jobs, gets
injured and accused of faking it, gets arrested for drunk driving, and
suspended for 4 weeks by the league for failing second cocaine test.
The guy has been in the pitts, but I hope if he plays Sunday, he gets a
decent reception by the fans in Three Rivers. I know his recent
escapades have been textbook How-Not-To, but it's a proven fact that
some people just can't handle the pressures and turn to drugs and
alcohol.
I only wish Tim Worley the best in his football career and in keeping
himself off of the substances. Everybody deserves a second chance, and
this is Worley's.
JaKe
|
35.419 | Uncle Al will come calling | SHALOT::MEDVID | sing your life | Thu Dec 12 1991 09:28 | 11 |
| > gets suspended during
> training camp for drugs(unpublicized by the league cause he was a first
> time offender), has a business that is in financial deep do-do and
> being investigated, loses starting(and second string) jobs, gets
> injured and accused of faking it, gets arrested for drunk driving, and
> suspended for 4 weeks by the league for failing second cocaine test.
Sounds like the perfect Raider to me.
--dan'l
|
35.420 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Dec 12 1991 10:20 | 7 |
| JaKe... Why activate the guy... It's not like
the Squeelers are going to the playoffs or anything.
HHHHAAAAAAA!!!!
Big Game
|
35.421 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Dasher, Dancer, Donner and BLITZED!! | Thu Dec 12 1991 15:55 | 12 |
| First of all, Worley was suspended for 6 weeks, not the 4 weeks I
originally put in here.
Secondly, BOTH Worley and Long are expected to be activated for
Sunday's game with the Bungholes, but Long still has some tenderness in
his elbow, which may keep him out of the game.
Thirdly, Mr. Big'n'Lame, go back-off in your own jack yard.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
35.422 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Dec 12 1991 16:38 | 5 |
| Now Now, JaKe...
That could be promoting un-safe sex !! ;^)
BG
|
35.423 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Dec 13 1991 08:47 | 7 |
| Open letter to Jake.
Yo. I've got the information you requested but I cain't send it to you
since you've maxed out your disk quota. Clear some space and I'll send
it along.
Ninj
|
35.424 | ninj, send it to Hawk instead! | CST17::FARLEY | feed your Xmas Drood(tm) BethleHAM and Cheese | Fri Dec 13 1991 08:50 | 1 |
|
|
35.425 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Playin with the box the kids came in | Fri Dec 13 1991 21:36 | 11 |
| Read in today's paper that the indy Colts have incluede J_e Walt_n(no
"O") in their list of prospective head coaches. Show they don't have a
clue at what they'll have to do to turn their team around, Eh??
Will Sunday's meeting between the Steelers and the Cincy Bungholes be
the lasted meeting between Noll and Wicky Wacky Wyche?????
Both are in danger of losing their jobs after the season ends.
JaKe
|
35.426 | Steelers are now 6-9, and tied with the 'Spots | PTOVAX::JACOB | Playin with the box the kids came in | Mon Dec 16 1991 21:55 | 62 |
| SCORING SUMMARY
1 2 3 4 T
Bungholes 0 7 3 0 10
STEELERS 10 0 0 7 17
STEELERS-Cooper 47 yd pas from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Anderson 47 yd FG
Cincy- Fulcher 27 yd interception return(Breech PAT)
Cincy- Breech 39 yd FG
STEELERS-Cash 19 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
A-35,420
TEAM STATS:
Cincy STEELERS
13 1st Downs 18
26-75 Rushes-Yards 36-149
120 Passing Yds 177
14-26-2 Compl-Att-Int 15-28-2
1-5 Sacked-Yds lost 1-7
5-40 Punts 1-54
3-0 Fumbles-Lost 4-3
5-30 Penalties-Yards 7-64
27:31 Time of Possession 32:29
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Cincy--Green 18-62, Brooks 6-11, Esiason 2-2
STEELERS--Hoge 16-79, W.Williams 6-35, Worley 6-33, Brister 5-12, Thompson 1-1,
Stryzinski 2-(-1)
PASSING:
Cincy--Esiason 14-26 2 INT, 125 yards
STEELERS--Brister 15-28 2 INT, 2 TD's, 184 yards.
RECEIVING:
Cincy--Brown 5-50, Barber 3-27, Green 2-29, Holman 2-5, Brooks 1-9, Taylor 1-5
STEELERS--Cash 4-55, Hoge 4-33, Lipps 3-33, W.Williams 2-2, Cooper 1-47, Mills
1-14.
Tim Worley, who had not, before this week, practiced with the Steelers since
August, gained 33 yards on 6 carries(5.5/carry) but fumbled the ball away on
his first carry of the game. He said he got encouragement on the sidelines
from the coaches and fellow players and returned to the game.
The local Pittsburgh papers, both the Press and the Post-Gazette "hailed"
Brister and said he resurected the offense. I don't know what game they were
watching, but in the Steeler-Bengal game I watched, if the Steelers had a
competent QB at the helm, they would have won 42-3. Personally, I think the
Steelers played Brister to showcase him for a possible off-season trade.
Brister is the probable starter for nexted Sunday's game .vs. the 'Spots.
Brister, in 7 prior meeting vs the Bungholes, was 0-7.
Noll hinted in his news conference today that he may not return nexted season
to coach the Steelers. When asked if he would consider coaching another team,
Noll said emphatically, "NO!!".
JaKe
|
35.427 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:41 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 35.426 by PTOVAX::JACOB "Playin with the box the kids came in" >>>
> -< Steelers are now 6-9, and tied with the 'Spots >-
For what, JaKe ... The worst team in the NFL in the weakest
divison with a Bozo nose picking fool for an offensive coordinator ?
;^)
Big Game
|
35.428 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Playin with the box the kids came in | Tue Dec 17 1991 16:16 | 10 |
|
>> For what, JaKe ... The worst team in the NFL in the weakest
>>divison with a Bozo nose picking fool for an offensive coordinator ?
Hey watch it, Big'n'Lame,
The Steelers resemble that remark!!!
JaKe
|
35.429 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Playin with the box the kids came in | Tue Dec 17 1991 16:29 | 7 |
| The Chuck Noll retirement watch is now at T-Minus 1 game and counting.
Any prognostications on what day eh'll announce his retirement, OR get
fired????
JaKe
|
35.430 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Time for F.A.R.T. again! | Tue Dec 17 1991 17:29 | 4 |
|
He'll stay...with Joe headed out the door.
B.A.
|
35.431 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Playin with the box the kids came in | Tue Dec 17 1991 17:32 | 12 |
| In his weekly news conference, he sounded like he may just say "to hell
with it", and get on with his life's work after the season ends.
If he stays, expect an almost complete change in the coaching staff
under him.
JaKe
|
35.432 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Dec 18 1991 11:20 | 4 |
| I for one won't be suprised to see him take his leave...
He's hung in for a long time.
BG
|
35.433 | Big day in Pittsburgh | SHALOT::MEDVID | Cooler than Jesus | Thu Dec 26 1991 10:35 | 12 |
| Today is the day Chuck Noll meets with Dan Rooney. It is speculated
that one of two things will happen:
- Noll will retire.
- Noll will continue as Steelers head coach but the coaching staff
will undergo a major overhaul with Joe Walton being the first out
the door.
Either way, Walton is gone. Sounds good to me.
--dan'l
|
35.434 | Pay for Performance????? | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Dec 26 1991 11:20 | 18 |
|
According to a NFL survey the Steelers have the lowest total base
salary $13,229,500 & total salaries(bonuses and incentives) $17,256,100
in the league.
A look at AFC central:
Clevaland Houston Cincinnati Steelers
* $21,018,500(5) $19,453,500(10) $20,756,800(8) $13,229,500(28)
% $28,348,750(2) $23,245,500(13) $23,073,800(14) $17,256,100(28)
* Total Base %Total Salaries
Individual numbers on the way.
Roy L.
|
35.435 | Just the way the Rooneys are... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Cooler than Jesus | Thu Dec 26 1991 11:23 | 7 |
| > -< Pay for Performance????? >-
The Steelers have historically been the lowest paying team in the
NFL...even during the super bowl years. This is nothing new and is not
based on the recent lack of team performance.
--dan'l
|
35.436 | Individual salaries | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Dec 26 1991 16:06 | 73 |
| POS NAME SALARY POS NAME SALARY
DB Rod Woodson $1,000,000 QB Bubby Brister $900,000
WR Louis Lipps $750,000 LB David Little $650,000
LB Greg Lloyd $410,000 RB Merril Hoge $400,000
TE Mike Mularkey $350,000 LB Brian Hinkle $350,000
RB Tim Worley $350,000 OL Tunch Ilkin $350,000
PK Gary Anderson $350,000 LB Huey Richardson $325,000
DL Keith Willis $325,000 DL Gerald Williams $300,000
DB David Johnson $300,000 TE Eric Green $300,000
OL Terry Long $277,000 DL Aaron Jones $275,000
DB Delton Hall $275,000 OL Tom Ricketts $250,000
LB Hardy Nickerson $236,300 OL John Jackson $225,000
OL Dermotti Dawson $220,000 WR Jeff Graham $220,000
DB Carnell Lake $220,000 DL Kenny Davidson $210,000
WR Ernie Mills $200,000 DB Thomas Everett $194,300
QB Neil O'Donnell $185,000 WR Dwight Stone $176,000
QB Rick Strom $165,000 LB Jerry Olsavsky $160,000
DL Craig Veasey $160,000 OL Dean Caliguire $150,000
LB Rob McGovern $145,000 OL Brian Blankenship $145,000
DB Larry Griffin $137,000 DB Richard Shelton $135,000
P Dan Stryzinski $132,000 DB Sammy Walker $125,000
TE Adrian Cooper $125,000 LB Jerrol Williams $120,000
RB Leroy Thompson $115,000 WR Chris Callaway $115,000
DL Donald Evans $110,000 RB Barry Foster $97,500
OL Dean Dingman $95,000 OL Carlton Haselrig $90,000
LB Jeff Brady $90,000 DB Gary Jones $88,500
OL Justin Strzelczyk $85,000 DB Shawn Vincent $75,000
DB Kevin Smith $65,000
Pay by Position
POS NAME SALARY POS NAME SALARY
DB Rod Woodson $1,000,000 DB David Johnson $300,000
DB Delton Hall $275,000 DB Carnell Lake $220,000
DB Thomas Everett $194,300 DB Larry Griffin $137,000
DB Richard Shelton $135,000 DB Sammy Walker $125,000
DB Gary Jones $88,500 DB Shawn Vincent $75,000
DB Kevin Smith $65,000
DL Keith Willis $325,000 DL Gerald Williams $300,000
DL Aaron Jones $275,000 DL Kenny Davidson $210,000
DL Craig Veasey $160,000 DL Donald Evans $110,000
LB David Little $650,000 LB Greg Lloyd $410,000
LB Brian Hinkle $350,000 LB Huey Richardson $325,000
LB Hardy Nickerson $236,300 LB Jerry Olsavsky $160,000
LB Rob McGovern $145,000 LB Jerrol Williams $120,000
LB Jeff Brady $90,000
OL Tunch Ilkin $350,000 OL Terry Long $277,000
OL Tom Ricketts $250,000 OL John Jackson $225,000
OL Dermotti Dawson $220,000 OL Dean Caliguire $150,000
OL Brian Blankenship $145,000 OL Dean Dingman $95,000
OL Carlton Haselrig $90,000 OL Justin Strzelczyk $85,000
P Dan Stryzinski $132,000 PK Gary Anderson $350,000
QB Bubby Brister $900,000 QB Neil O'Donnell $185,000
QB Rick Strom $165,000
RB Merril Hoge $400,000 RB Tim Worley $350,000
RB Leroy Thompson $115,000 RB Barry Foster $97,500
TE Mike Mularkey $350,000 TE Eric Green $300,000
TE Adrian Cooper $125,000
WR Louis Lipps $750,000 WR Jeff Graham $220,000
WR Ernie Mills $200,000 WR Dwight Stone $176,000
WR Chris Callaway $115,000
Very few skilled position players are paid well but also very few have
performed well. Few all star players few all star salaries!!!
Roy L.
|
35.437 | A little analysis | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Dec 26 1991 16:13 | 12 |
| RE: -2
I agree with the Rooney's. Those players that have been all-stars a
number of years are making the most money i.e. Woodson, Lipps, Little
and Brister although he hasn't quite panned out. Brister still may
flourish in a less complicated offense. Tunch Ilkin has been an All
Pro lineman and he still only gets $350K(relative of other All Pro
linemen). There are a number of teams with big salaries that have
traditionally been below the steelers in wins. However that could be
related to all the high draft choices(Indianapolis).
Roy L.
|
35.438 | Knoll Retires!!!! | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Dec 26 1991 17:21 | 10 |
| I heard on the radio seconds ago that Knoll has indeed retired!!! He
is outta there. I did like Knoll very much as far as his philosphies
went. He did one thing over the last few years that didn't help him a
whole lot though; he gave his assistants to much reign(coordinators).
He always took the criticism but J_e Waltons offense just never panned
out. With his leaving though. Who would be a suitable replacement. I
hope it is a balanced aggressive coach type.
Roy L. Quinn
x31141
|
35.439 | coaches never retire, they just go to the booth... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang! | Fri Dec 27 1991 08:25 | 13 |
|
for all the offense he's produced over the years Gary Anderson is one under
paid dude....
too bad Chuck couldn't have gone out on winning note. he definately was one
of the all time great player/coaches in the game.
I do agree his assistants have hurt him. Despite spending some high draft
picks on the DL, Joe Greene hasn't done much with em....
think he'll make a good analyst?
mike
|
35.440 | Just came in to get me paycheck, today | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Fri Dec 27 1991 09:20 | 17 |
|
THE EMPEROR IS DEAD!!
LONG LIVE THE EMPEROR!!!!!
Noll said it would've been nice to go out on a winning note, but that's
the breaks.
To all of you louses out there,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!
I'm outta here til nexted thursday.
JaKe
|
35.441 | Knew it was coming, but my heart is still heavy today | SHALOT::MEDVID | Cooler than Jesus | Fri Dec 27 1991 09:34 | 28 |
| > too bad Chuck couldn't have gone out on winning note.
It wasn't a winning season, but he did go out on a winning note. The
Steelers beat Cinci and Cleveland in their last two games. The players
gave Noll the game ball after the Cleveland win obviously thinking it
would be his last game.
At least he was allowed to call his own shots on his retirement, unlike
the Dallas debacle. Noll and Landry were the last of the career
coaches. Noll had 23 years with the Steelers and no one else.
> I do agree his assistants have hurt him. Despite spending some high draft
> picks on the DL, Joe Greene hasn't done much with em....
According to ESPN's SportsCenter, Joe Green is the first man in line to
succeed Noll. The front office is concerned about Green's lack of head
coaching experience...take a look at Art Shell, Rooneys.
Myself, I wish Schottenheimer were available. He was a player under
Noll and he is from Pittsburgh...went to highschool with my uncle and
won the state championship in basketball with him.
I won't complain if they give Green a shot as long as Walton is gone.
I'll tell you one thing, I wouldn't want to be a referee and make a bad
call against head coach Joe Green. Yowza, what an ear licking that
would cause.
--dan'l
|
35.442 | Chuck-- getting on with his lifes work??? | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Dec 27 1991 10:17 | 33 |
| I would be highly surprised if Chuck heads to the booth. I don't think
Chuck likes pandering to an audience to much. I could be wrong but it
could indeed be worse with a TV audience. But who am I to say, all the
other coaches seem to like the booth.
When times were really hard, fans have called for Knoll's head but not
many wanted to see him actually go. Although he will still have to go
down in history as a Great coach (4SB winners) he was never awarded the
"Coach of the Year" award.
I as Dan'l stated liked the fact that it appeared to be knoll's choice.
He didn't look to be upset or mad about the situation but did harbor
the disappointment of not having 10 wins and being in the playoffs.
Replacement:
Greene -- ESPN does say he is the leading candidate with very little
competition behind him. My concern is basically with the offense. I
has been so dismal over the last few years and it make your defense
look much worse than it is. I.E. long stints on the field. I'm for
Greene but where would the offensive coordinator come from.
AFC Central Coaches of Past Few Years
Pitt-Knoll Clev-Belicheck Cinn-Wyche Hou-Pardee
-Carson -????? -Glanville
-Schottenhiemer -????? -????????
-Rutigliano -????? -Phillips
Sam and Chuck held the fort the longest also the only Superbowl
participants as coaches. Can anybody fill in the blanks.
Roy L.
|
35.443 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Dec 27 1991 10:22 | 14 |
| At least one of the Houston coaches between Bum Phillips and Jerry
Glanville was Hugh Campbell, who had been Warren Moon's coach up at
Edmonton. They had at least one interim coach in there, who I believe
was Chuck Studley.
Cincinnati's first coach was Paul Brown and then he was replaced by
Bill "Tiger" Johnson, in the move that in turn caused Bill Walsh to
move out to the West Coast, first to San Diego, then Stanford and then
finally San Francisco. Tiger was replaced by Forrest Gregg, who
coached them to their first Super Bowl appearance. When Gregg left to
go to Green Bay, Wyche replaced him.
John
|
35.444 | Greatest Coach Ever: "Chuck Noll, 4 Rings" | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kooler than Jesus | Fri Dec 27 1991 10:29 | 16 |
| OK, first things first: Chuck spells his last name N-O-L-L. There is
no K as Glanville would have liked everyone to believe a few years ago.
Noll is definitely not suited for any kind of announcing or analyst
position. He's a quiet man with a quick temper. And can you imagine
him at CBS with Bradshaw? Hooboy.
My greatest worry is that some team will talk Noll out of retirement in
a few years and he'll take the job. What a terrible sight it would be
to see Noll somewhere else. Successful or not, it would almost be a
feeling of betrayal. Kind of hard to understand except I have felt it
before when Franco put on a Seattle uniform and Mike Webster put on a
KC uniform. And I'm getting prepared to feel it this spring when I see
Bonilla in a Mets uniform.
--nufrie ;-)
|
35.445 | No one in Pittsburgh can be happy about this... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 27 1991 10:43 | 12 |
|
Also, Joe spells his name G-R-E-E-N-E. That last E gives him a
little distinctiveness.
Noll's departure was indeed a sad event, but I guess everyone's got
to go sooner or later. Like dan'l said, though, there's really no
good way to do it and there's no way that Dan Rooney would do
to Noll what Jerry Jones did to Tom Landry. The next coach will
have a huge shadow hovering over him...
glenn
|
35.446 | Give head job to Walton! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Dec 27 1991 11:15 | 8 |
| Good luck Chuck! I never cared for your Sqeelers, but you did have
strong teams during the 70's.
I think Greene would be a flop. I also think that whomever does take
this job will end up having the same bad seasons as Chuck has these
past few.
Tim
|
35.447 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Fri Dec 27 1991 14:02 | 2 |
| Heard on SportsCenter lasted night...
"First the Iron Curtain, now the Steel Curtain..."
|
35.448 | | CAMONE::WAY | Testicles,JennyTailya,D.Smith | Fri Dec 27 1991 14:23 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 35.447 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith" >>>
>
> Heard on SportsCenter lasted night...
> "First the Iron Curtain, now the Steel Curtain..."
That's a great one, Slasher....
|
35.449 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Dec 27 1991 14:23 | 32 |
|
I'm sad to see Noll go, but then again, maybe it was time for a
change. Nothing wrong with change either.
Noll gave the Steeler organization 23 great years. Yea, there
were some bad and some terrible years, but those 10 good years have
a way of erasing all the negative stuff.
Noll was stubborn and an S.O.B., but maybe that's what it takes to
be effective. He never let the players boss him around and he always
let them know who was in charge whether they liked it or not. He
really didn't have any favorites...everyone was treated the same.
Chuck wasn't perfect, but he was an excellent teacher of basic
fundamental football, and told it like it was. He's not and never
was a media darling, but that's just the way he wanted it I'm sure,
and it's probably the way most Pittsburgher's wanted it.
Although building what has been called the greatest team in the
history of the NFL and along the way winning 4 Super Bowls, the one
award that has escaped him has been Coach of the Year. Somewhere in
those 23 years, this coach certainly deserved that honor, but I guess
that's the way he wanted it and I guess most Pittsburgher's feel the
same way.
Here's hoping that Chuck stays retired and enjoys his trip to
Canton in 5 years.
bill..g.
|
35.450 | Noll did win COY in a year he really deserved it | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kooler than Jesus | Fri Dec 27 1991 14:48 | 14 |
| Actually, Noll did win COY in '89. It was the year the team got
outscored in its first two games something like 92-13. They won their
last five games, made the playoffs as a wild card, beat the Oilers in
Houston on Gary Anderson's memorable 52-yard field goal in OT, and
played their hearts out in Denver (especially Merrill Hoge) before
losing the game in the last five minutes.
Everyone expected the Steelers to ride that success to the AFC Central
title the next season, but the team went backward instead of forward.
You really have to believe a lot of this was due to Joe Walton. Gotta
wonder what would have happened had Noll gone with a different
offensive coordinator.
--nufrie
|
35.451 | Black and Gold are great colors | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Dec 27 1991 18:02 | 18 |
| Before Noll, the Steeler's were the doormat of the NFL for 35 years.
He took the most pitiful team in the NFL and turned it into maybe the
best NFL team ever. Last night on ESPN they showed an interesting stat.
The 49'ers who have won 4 superbowls have 9 players with 4 superbowl
rings while the Steeler's have 21 players with 4 superbowl rings. While
the 49'ers saw a number of changes in there Superbowl victories, the
Steeler's were basically the same team in all 4 Superbowls. Thanks for
all the memories Chuck, you did a great job.
In regards to Joe Greene, I can remember his rookie year in 1968 when the
team went 1-13. The team was terrible but in every home game, there was
at least one standing ovation for "Mean Joe". You could tell that he was
bringing some kind of winning spirit to a team that never had any. If as
head coach he can capture that magic again and motivate the players as he
did as a player, he'll be a success. If the Rooney's want Mean Joe, I'm
all for it.
Keith
|
35.452 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kooler than Jesus | Sat Dec 28 1991 14:29 | 6 |
| > Also, Joe spells his name G-R-E-E-N-E. That last E gives him a
> little distinctiveness.
Hey, how was I supposed to know...he never gave ME his smelly jersey!
|
35.453 | | CAMONE::WAY | Wake up Mamma, turn your lamp down low | Mon Dec 30 1991 07:23 | 1 |
| I thought that was a GREAT commercial 8^)
|
35.454 | Interesting stats | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Mon Dec 30 1991 09:44 | 9 |
| Keith,
Interesting stats on SF vs. Pitt on SB rings.
Not to put down Noll as the 70's Steelers were my all-time fav,
but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.
MikeL
|
35.455 | Pointless...both teams were great | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kooler than Jesus | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:08 | 14 |
| > but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
> prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.
Arguments can be made in both directions so it's kind of pointless.
Noll drafted and developed a team that won four super bowls in six
years. That may never be done again. A combination of low draft picks
and almost all his coaching staff from those teams moving on to bigger
positions really hurt the Steelers in the 80's.
When those low picks didn't pan out and the Gabe Rivera tragedy
occurred, the Steelers never did attain their goal of "one for the
thumb."
--dan'l
|
35.456 | Probably comes down to years of contention vs. titles | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:16 | 16 |
|
> Not to put down Noll as the 70's Steelers were my all-time fav,
> but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
> prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.
Depends on how you look at it, Mike. Pittsburgh obviously had the
better concentration of draft talent. Stuff like two Hall of Famers
in the same draft (Lambert and Swann), and maybe the best collection
of talent of all time assembled in the span of 5-7 years. So which
is "better", beating the so-called draft crapshoot in a big way
all at once or doing maybe not quite as well in the short term but
spreading it out? Either way, it's four rings (although San Francisco
may not be done in the Montana era...)
glenn
|
35.457 | Both at nadir | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:22 | 9 |
| True dan'l,
Both teams were great. As you pointed out many factors affect
continued success. At first glance, my initial reaction was to be
more impressed with SF; however when you are looking at the higher
plateau both teams reached, it seems pointless. And it is. I'm looking
for no argument, just a little more wowed by SF. I remain.
MikeL
|
35.458 | | CAMONE::WAY | Wake up Mamma, turn your lamp down low | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:24 | 11 |
| > -< Both at nadir >-
^^^^^
Zenith. Nadir is the opposite low point.... (unless of course you're
referring to their CURRENT sitauation 8^))
'Saw
|
35.459 | who said this conf wasn't educational | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:35 | 9 |
| I stand corrected, SIR.
Wow, first Apostrophe Police, now Correct Word Selection Militia.
I have been schooled. Danke.
MikeL
P.S. Good points Glenn
|
35.460 | Noll>>>Walsh MOPB... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang! | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:41 | 14 |
|
Niners also had the advantage of plan B for two of their victories and an
owner who wasn't tight with his money and bought and traded for any player
Billy W. wanted.
Also Steelers won 4 in 7 years, Niners 4 in 9 years. Also have to feel the
talent base has been more widely distributed during the Niners years. So
while an argument can be made that they had less of an edge, it can also
be argued for the Steelers that they had to beat another "great" team every
year (ie Raiders) to advance...
mike
|
35.461 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:35 | 28 |
| A few replies back someone said the Steeler's had 2 Hall of Famer's in
one years draft. Actually, it's one Hall of Famer but with a slim possibility
that it may become 4 Hall of Famer's. The year was 1974. Lynn Swan was the
#1 pick. Jack Lambert was the #2, Mike Webster was #3 and John Stallworth
was the #4 pick. Lambert is all ready in the HOF, Webster is probably a
shoe in for the HOF, Swann has a good shot at making the HOF and Stallworth
has an outside shot of making the HOF. With out a doubt, the Steeler's 1974
draft was the best in the history of Pro Football.
If I remember correctly, I believe the Steeler's #1 draft's were:
1968: Joe Greene
1969: Terry Bradshaw
1970: Mel Blount
1971: Franco Harris
1972: Can't remember
1973: Can't Remember
1974: Lynn Swan plus Lambert, Webster and Stallworth in the later
rounds .
Does anyone remember when Jack Ham was drafted and in what round ?
> Also Steelers won 4 in 7 years, Niners 4 in 9 years.
Minor nit but the Steeler's won it all in 74,75,78,79. That makes 4 SB wins
in 6 years. Allthough many people believe the 1976 Steeler's team was
the best team they ever had.
Keith
|
35.462 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:38 | 2 |
| Are you sure Swann and Stallworth were drafted the same year? I
thought Swann came out a year or two before Stallworth.
|
35.463 | '74 no doubt the best draft ever by anyone! | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:00 | 23 |
|
re: Drafts..
O.K. here's what I've been able to come up with from my Steeler's
of the Decade program..sorry, I used to have a Steeler Press Guide,
but it's not here at work.
1969: Greene, Jon Kolb (3rd round), LC Greenwood (9th round)
1970: Bradshaw (1), Mel Blount (3rd round),
1971: Ham (second round), Larry Brown (8th)
1972: Franco (1st), Steve Furness (5th)
1973: J.T. Thomas (1st)
1974: Swann (1st), Lambert (2nd), Stallworth (4th), Webster (5th)
Note: Randy Grossman and Donnie Shell signed as free agents.
Don't know where guys like Ron Shanklin, Dwight White, Ernie Holmes
Mike Wagner and Glen Edwards fit in, but these guys also played major
roles, not in all 4 SB's, but for the most part in the early to mid-
70's...Oh, I did leave out the 'Rock'..Rocky Blier!
bill..g.
|
35.464 | More draft info | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:07 | 26 |
| >> 1969: Greene, Jon Kolb (3rd round), LC Greenwood (9th round)
>> 1970: Bradshaw (1), Mel Blount (3rd round),
>> 1971: Ham (second round), Larry Brown (8th)
>> 1972: Franco (1st), Steve Furness (5th)
>> 1973: J.T. Thomas (1st)
>> 1974: Swann (1st), Lambert (2nd), Stallworth (4th), Webster (5th)
Note: Randy Grossman and Donnie Shell signed as free agents.
>> Don't know where guys like Ron Shanklin, Dwight White, Ernie Holmes
>> Mike Wagner and Glen Edwards fit in, but these guys also played major
>> roles, not in all 4 SB's, but for the most part in the early to mid-
>> 70's...Oh, I did leave out the 'Rock'..Rocky Blier!
1968: Rocky Blier(16th)
1969: Terry Hanratty(2nd)
1970: Ron Shanklin(2nd)
1971: Dwight White(4a), Gerry Mullins(4), Ernie Holmes(8b)
Mike Wagner(11)
1972: Joe Gilliam(11)
1973: Loren Toews(8b)
This is all the additional information that I guide find from the Steelers
1990 media guide. I couldn't find anything on Glen Edwards though.
Roy L.
|
35.465 | Edwards free agent 1971 | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:11 | 5 |
|
Glen Edwards is listed as playing for the Steelers frm 1971-1977 so he
had to be a free agent pickup out of Florida A&M.
Roy L.
|
35.466 | worse than Jack Tatum | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kooler than Jesus | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:12 | 5 |
| Wow, I didn't realize Mike Wagner was an 11th round pick. He was one
of the best defensive players ever and oh what a hard hitter...and a
dirty player too. Receivers absolutely feared him.
--dan'l
|
35.467 | | CAMONE::WAY | Wake up Mamma, turn your lamp down low | Tue Dec 31 1991 07:21 | 6 |
| Blier was drafted in 68, but he didn't start playing until 1970, right?
Because of being in 'Nam and having his foot wounded and all....
Just trying to get some years straight....
'Saw
|
35.468 | They're still a fog! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Dec 31 1991 08:15 | 2 |
| I'm still trying to get those particular years straight myself 'Saw.
Denny
|
35.469 | | CAMONE::WAY | Wake up Mamma, turn your lamp down low | Tue Dec 31 1991 08:22 | 9 |
| > I'm still trying to get those particular years straight myself 'Saw.
hahahahahahahaha....
Yeah, but I was like 12 then, Denny. That's not to say that I wasn't
a little wild, but...
'Saw
|
35.470 | All You OLDDDD People...No wonder you cant get the years | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 31 1991 09:47 | 2 |
| 1970...Hmmmm... I was lets see... 3
M_air_Brooks
|
35.471 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Sleeping with the Lambs | Tue Dec 31 1991 13:28 | 8 |
|
> 1970...Hmmmm... I was lets see... 3
M_air_Brooks
Air, you don't even shave yet! 8^)
Dickstah
|
35.472 | 24 years old and counting.... | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 31 1991 14:23 | 8 |
| Hey Dickstah Dont you owe me something, you said you were going
to say something nice after you collected :-)
And believe me the worst day of my life was when I had to shave
the first time, I hate it...... Luckily I dont have to do it very
often :-) (hair dont run in my family but neither does Baldness)
M_Air_Brooks
|
35.473 | Finally got this modem thing working. | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Tue Dec 31 1991 16:14 | 25 |
|
>>shoe in for the HOF, Swann has a good shot at making the HOF and Stallworth
>>has an outside shot of making the HOF. With out a doubt, the Steeler's 1974
Actually, I think Stallworth has a better chance of getting into the
HOF than Swann does. Swann has already been passed over a few times.
He had good stats for the years he played, plus some GREAT circus
catches, but he didn't have longevity. He quit after doctors told him
another concussion could render him either daid or a candidate for a
Veg-A-Matic.
Stallworth played something like 12 years, and missed very little time
to injury. He is the Steelers leading receiver in many categories, but
may be passed by Louis Lipps if Lipps stays around long enuf.
BTW, the top 3, according to 2 TV stations here in Pittsburgh, in the
Steelers coaching search are Dave Wannstadt(sp?), defensive
co-ordinator for Dallas, ???? Holmgren, Offensive co-ordinator in San
Fran, and the defensive co-ordinator for the New York Jets, whose name
escapes me at this moment. I hope they don't pick the guy from the
Jets, cause everybody knows about the lasted coach they got from the
Jets!!!!
JaKe
|
35.474 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:57 | 19 |
| The Steelers have scheduled an interview with Rod Rust(no, please,
don't hire him, PULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE DON'T)
They also plan to interview, or have already interviewed the following:
Current running back coach, Dick Hoak, defensive line coach Joe Greene,
secondary coach John Fox
Greg Landry
Dave Wannstedt
Bill Cowher
Mike Holmgren
Stanford coach Dennis Green
San Antonio Riders(WLAF) coach Mike Riley
There are others whose names excape me as of this writing, who either
were interviewed, or will be soon.
JaKe
|
35.475 | you definitely don't want Rust | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:00 | 10 |
| re .474:
> The Steelers have scheduled an interview with Rod Rust(no, please,
> don't hire him, PULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE DON'T)
As one who saw Rust's "work" all too close-up here in New England last
year, I read you loud and clear.
py
|
35.476 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:08 | 3 |
| Jake, I predict that Dave Wannstedt will wind up with the Steeler job.
WILDCAT
|
35.477 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:11 | 5 |
| As I understand it, Rod Rust isn't being interviewed for the job of head
coach, but rather, the job of defensive coordinator at both Pittsburgh
and San Diego. He's a great defensive coordinator.
John
|
35.478 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:17 | 20 |
|
>>Jake, I predict that Dave Wannstedt will wind up with the Steeler job.
>>WILDCAT
I don't klnow what it is, but something keeps telling me that this is
true. I have had that feeling ever since his name popped into the
bucket full of candidates for the job, which was the day Noll retired.
Re Ninj
I wouldn't mind seeing Rust come back to Pittsburgh as defensive
co-ordinator. He built the Steeler defense that finished #1 lasted
year, even though eh was in N.E. by then. David Brazille did nothing
to change Rust's defense, but then decided to try and fine tune it this
year and they finished considerably lower. Rust would be a good choice
for the defensive job here.
JaKe
|
35.479 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 19:16 | 6 |
| JaKe...
I Predict the Squeelers will be at the bottom of the weakest division
in football once again nexted(tm) season... Wanna bet ???
BG
|
35.480 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Tue Jan 07 1992 23:26 | 12 |
|
>> I Predict the Squeelers will be at the bottom of the weakest division
>>in football once again nexted(tm) season... Wanna bet ???
1st of all they finished in 2nd place in the AFC Central this year, not
lasted.
Secondly, if they'll be at the bottom of the weakest division in
football, they'll have to change divisions to the AFC West.
JaKe
|
35.481 | ;^) | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:46 | 10 |
|
Not !!!!
I beleive that the AFC West had 3, count `em, 3 teams in the playoffs
this season. I can see how you could make a case for it being the
weakest division from stats like that. And to top it off, The AFC
West has a team in the Championship game... When was the lasted(tm)
time the Central did...
BG
|
35.482 | Entire AFC is weak, nothing to proud of at all | SHALOT::MEDVID | paint me in leather | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:06 | 9 |
| Cleveland, 1989, lost to Denver who had barely gotten by Pittsburgh the
week before.
But what JaKe was pointing out, Big Pain, was that you said Pittsbugh
would finish at the bottom of the AFC central AGAIN. When, please
tell, was the last time that happened?
--dan'l
|
35.483 | I kinda like "Big Pain" I was rollward !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:54 | 12 |
| Not sure dan'l...
The bottom line is that the Squeelers are weak. Their division is the
weakest in the AFC if not the Entire NFL (NFC Central a tie or close
2nd) So... My Point was (and it was in fun) that it really doesn't
matter who coaches the Squeelers this year or nexted(tm). They have
much rebuilding to do and it will take some time (1 to 2 years) to get
them out of the cellar
HTH
BG
|
35.484 | BP, you must have a funny looking house | SHALOT::MEDVID | paint me in leather | Wed Jan 08 1992 14:08 | 11 |
| > much rebuilding to do and it will take some time (1 to 2 years) to get
> them out of the cellar
Big Pain, the Steelers are/were not in the cellar!!!!! They finished
second in their division and there are about nine or ten teams picking
in front of them in next year's draft.
I'm not certain, but I would guess that the Steelers have not finished
at the bottom of the AFC Central since 1969.
--dan'l
|
35.485 | | FSOA::JRODOPOULOS | Intl. Business Support | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:44 | 8 |
| If Wandstedt (sp) get the job it will be a big loss to the Dallas
Cowboys. He did an excellent job the last two years with minimal
talent.
But then again as Dallas fans it sure feels great knowing that others
within the NFL appreciate our coaching staff.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
35.486 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:43 | 5 |
| I've read/heard a couple reports stating that Mean Joe Greene is the
leading candidate for the head coaching job...any truth to these?
py
|
35.487 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:50 | 10 |
| Heard the Same... I think it would be a step in the right direction
for the Squeelers. Look what Shell did for the Faiders. With a half
assed QB they surely would have beaten out the Donks for the AFC West.
Also, With the overwhelming Population of Blacks in the NFL it seems
quite odd to me that we only have one Black head coach considering the
available talent in the assistant coaches ranks. Joe Greene as done a
great job for the Squeelers both as a player and a coach. I say give
the bum a shot at it.
Big Game Hunta
|
35.488 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:55 | 12 |
| The one drawback with Greene is his lack of experience. He has been
defensive line coach for the Steelers, but that has been his ONLY
coaching job since retiring as a player. Greene will be given an
interview, and I sincerely hope he gets a head coaching job someday,
but I think he needs some more experience, as a defensive co-ordinator,
before he'll be ready to step in as a head coach.
Would be something, though, eh, Mean Joe returns and builds another
super bowl team.
JaKe
|
35.489 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 18:05 | 5 |
| Well,
That may be taking it a bit far, Rake
Big Game Hunta
|
35.490 | no room to talk... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Is it a question of Love? hahaaaaa | Thu Jan 09 1992 09:13 | 3 |
|
small time Hunta, I'S gottsta to no 'ow u cain sit thar & lambast Wrong Way
when he's polished off those wimpy a$$ Donks 5 out of the last 6 games?
|
35.491 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 11:22 | 7 |
|
I can Blam(tm) Wrong Way because he's always sitting at home when
the Donks are in the Championship game. Jay gets lucky and Beats
the Donks (and it surely ain't all Jay either...) But he can't keep
them in it till the end. Wrong way is weak, weak, weak...
BGH
|
35.492 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The People's NoTY 1991 : DrM | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:30 | 3 |
| Speaking of ex-Steeler assistants, what about Tony Dungy ? He was
former D.C. of the Steelers, did a great job, and was considered to be
the fav. to be the 1st black head coach. Then, I hear nothing.
|
35.493 | Is exper necessary//How much did Chuck Noll have? | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:00 | 14 |
| RE: -1
I saw Tony Dungy in the coaches booth for a team in the playoffs. I
think it was KC. He did sort of fade out of the limelight. His name
hasn't even been mentioned lately.
As a part of a SD feature early to mid season Mean Joe says that he
isn't quite ready for head coaching. He may feel that this year taught
some valuable lessons. How much experience did Art Shell have as a
coach before getting the head job?? I wonder how much input Chuck gets
if any at all.
Roy L.
|
35.494 | Dungy | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 13 1992 19:15 | 8 |
| Dungy fell out of favor around the NFL when his Steeler defense went
south a few years ago when he was defensive coordinator for the
Steelers. The Steelers fired him and brought in Rod Rust to replace
him.
JaKe
|
35.495 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 13 1992 19:20 | 19 |
| The Steelers, once the interview Woody Widenhofer tomorrow, will have
completed their list of candidates for the vacant head coaching job.
It appears, short of adding Widenhofer to the list, that they have
whittled their list down to 3 people, KC defensive coordinator Bill
Cowher, Dallas Defensive coordinator Dave Wannstedt, and Steelers
defensive line coach Joe Greene. These were the only 3 who have been
interviewed twice, and Tom Donahoe said today no other candidates are
to be scheduled for a second interview, but the three mentioned above
may be scheduled for third interviews shortly.
Wannstedt met with the Steelers for an 8 hour interview Saturday, and
is said to be the leading candidate for the job.
Donahoe also said that an announcement naming the new head coach could
come as early as the end of this week.
JaKe
|
35.496 | Head coach of college intramural teams or what? | SHALOT::MEDVID | not one ounce or inch of control | Tue Jan 14 1992 09:19 | 5 |
| The knock against Joe Greene is that he has no head coaching
experience. What are Cowher's and Wannstedt's experiences regarding
this category?
--dan'l
|
35.497 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jan 14 1992 09:29 | 5 |
| None that I know of. The real knock against Greene is that he's never
been a coordinator which is the usual career path to becoming a head
coach.
John
|
35.498 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Can you say 'triangulated crossfire'? | Tue Jan 14 1992 16:34 | 1 |
| Yeah, Greene has been soley DL coach, no other experience.
|
35.499 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jan 14 1992 16:44 | 6 |
| Wasn't Art Shell solely an OL coach before becoming the Raiders' head
coach? Haven't heard many complaints from Raider fans about Shell's
coaching...
py
|
35.500 | .500! :-) | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jan 14 1992 16:44 | 1 |
|
|
35.501 | Which means he'll probably get the job... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:24 | 8 |
|
Is Greene really a candidate or his name there for appeasement
purposes? I find it hard to believe that Greene's a serious candidate
after he himself stated that he wasn't sure if he was ready or if he
really even wanted the job at this time...
glenn
|
35.502 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:30 | 14 |
| glenn
I think Greene is on the list for "sentimental" type reasons. Ya know,
HOF'er from the glory years, working for the team for the lasted few
years. Given 2 interviews as more a courtesy than anything else.
Common consensus around Pittsburgh is that the Steelers, if they hired
Greene, would have to surround him with the best of assistant coaches
in every position to make this team go anywhere. They'd end up like
Hal's Brown(spot)s(tm) and have a zillion assistant coaches, and like
Hal's 'Spots, go absolutely nowhere.
JaKe
|
35.503 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:49 | 5 |
| Kinda like this year, Huh Fake !!
;^)
Big Game Junta
|
35.504 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Wed Jan 15 1992 16:11 | 12 |
| Cowher interviewed for ~5 hours with the Steelers the other day.
Widenhofer is on the list to be interviewed SOON.
It's almost getting easier to list who HASN'T been interviewed for the
vacant head coach position.
Latest news here is still that Wannstedt is the leader and Cowher is
right behind him. Both are from the Pittsburgh area with close ties to
the city.
JaKe
|
35.505 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Wed Jan 15 1992 19:24 | 6 |
| Hey FaKe... Dose it really matter ?? A simple coaching change ain't
gonna help your happless Squeelers... Give up on the Bums and come
over to a real team like thye Mighty Broncos of Denver Colorado.
Now thats manly team !! ;^)
BGJ
|
35.506 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Wed Jan 15 1992 20:51 | 5 |
| Ya know, Little 'n' Lame, that's one thing I like about you, you always
make me laugh. Sorta like a HaloftheBroncos.
JaKe
|
35.507 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Fri Jan 17 1992 16:42 | 11 |
| Head Coach position expected to be filled Monday or Tuesday. Wannstedt
is still the leading candidate. The Steelers gave him a third
interview yesterday. he's the only of the interviewees to be talked to
3 times, but Bill Cowher is expected to get 1 more interview, as is the
Offensive Coordinator from the Oilers, whose name escapes me at this
time.
Got my money on Wannstedt
JaKe
|
35.508 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 20 1992 15:46 | 8 |
| The Steelers will announce at a press conference at noon tomorrow that
the new Head Coach will be:
Bill Cowher, Defensive Coordinator of the Kansas City Chiefs.
JaKe
|
35.509 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 20 1992 16:28 | 7 |
| First rumor about Cowher is that he'll hire Lindy Infante as the
Offensive Coordinator.
Cowher will have full power over who is hired as assistant coaches.
JaKe
|
35.510 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers need a coach and 5 yrs | Mon Jan 20 1992 18:18 | 4 |
| after what Infante did at Greenbay I'd better change my p-name to
"Steelers still need coaches and 20 or 30 years" Ha.... !!
BG
|
35.511 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 20 1992 20:45 | 24 |
| Re Infante, new reports say that Infante said he has no interest in
coaching again in the near future. I wonder if it could be about the
fact that the Packers have to pay him ~$1 million over the nexted two
years, and he wants to just go golfing and collect his money??
Ya know it's sort of funny, Cowher hasn't even OFFICIALLY been
announced as head coach and the local media is soiling their pants over
the guy already. Tonite, a local radio station that is ALL-TALK and
nothing but sports in the evening started having all of these people
that had something to do with Cowher and football as he was growing up in
Pittsburgh. They were getting people like assistant coaches from his
intermediate school days, etc. I almost expected them to get someone
like the next door neighbor of Cowher's Pee-Wee football coach's
brother-in-law's uncle and have the guy saying something like, "Ya
know, we uset ta watch dis kid when he wuz 8 or 9 years old and I just
told all of my buddies back then that in 25 years or so, dis kid would
be da coach of da Stillers."
It's sort of ridiculous to interview all of these bozos and think that
they remember every Tom Dick and Harry who comes through the schools
and different programs as well as they project they do over the radio.
JaKe
|
35.512 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Wed Jan 22 1992 20:11 | 10 |
| Would the 2 people who sent me mail asking about info on getting the
"Steeler's Digest" among other Steeler paraphenalia please send me
another mail message. I seem to have lost the other mail messages with
your node addresses and names.
Sorry
JaKe
|
35.513 | Cowher Confirmed | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Jan 23 1992 16:00 | 7 |
|
It was confirmed via yesterdays paper that Cowher did get the job.
Second youngest in the league behind Shula at Cincinnatti. Other than
the information posted here I haven't heard much about though.
Roy L.
|
35.514 | Minor notes | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:04 | 11 |
| FWIW, Mike Shanahan is in Pgh. today interviewing for the job of
Offensive Coordinator for the Steelers.
George Stewart, special teams coach, has taken the same job at Tampa
Bay under Wicky Wacky Wyche.
Joe Walton has been given formal notice that he will not be retained as
Offensive Coordinator for the team.
JaKe
|
35.515 | Ex-Steelers coaches popping up everywhere | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Fri Jan 24 1992 22:52 | 9 |
| David Brazille, who WAS the Steelers defensive coordinator this past
season has accepted the position of secondary coach for the NY Giants.
Tony Dungy, who held the defensive coordinator position for a few years
for the Steelers, has been hired as defensive coordinator for the
Minny-soda Vikings.
JaKe
|
35.516 | More on Cowher pleeze | SHALOT::MEDVID | too sexy for my car | Sun Jan 26 1992 11:25 | 11 |
| JaKe (or others),
how about some info on Cowher. Age. Experience. Pittsburgh
connection...I see from the Gene Collier article that he is from
Crafton...did he play for Carlinton or perhaps Canevan? Where did he
play college ball? You know, all the stuff that I've been missing on
ESPN and up in the local media.
Thanks.
--dan'l
|
35.517 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Sun Jan 26 1992 17:44 | 5 |
| Cowher played at NC State and then played for the Browns from 80-82.
He coached at Philly in 83-84, Cleveland 85-88, Kansas City 89-91. No
other info available.
John
|
35.518 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Mon Jan 27 1992 16:02 | 6 |
| Cowher is 34 years old, and played for Carlynton High School.
I'll see what else I cain dig up on him for ya, --dan'l.
JaKe
|
35.519 | Cowher hires some coaches | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Mon Jan 27 1992 19:59 | 10 |
|
Ron Erhardt--Offensive Coordinator
Dick Hoak--retained as running backs coach
Steve Furness--Defensive line coach
JaKe
|
35.520 | Profile on Cowher | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Mon Jan 27 1992 22:24 | 199 |
| --dan'l, you asked for it, here it is.
THE EYES HAVE IT!!
Cowher's enduring qualities can't be seen on his resume.
By Bill Utterbeck
from The Pittsburgh Press, 1-26-1992
Steelers coach Bill Cowher was born in 1957, the peak year of the baby
boom, the year that produced Donnie Osmond, Melanie Griffith, Michelle
Pfieffer, Geena Davis and Vanna White. A good year for beautiful women, but
perhaps, but a year that has not yet produced many dynamic quality males.
Can you picture Donnie Osmond stalking the sideline as head coach,
jumping in Bubby Brister's face about a poor decision, questioning Greg Lloyd
about a personal foul?? Isn't 34 too young to step into a world ruled by
experienced coaches such as Marv Levy, Joe Gibbs, Don Shula, Jack Pardee, Mike
Ditka, and Chuck Knox?
When Cowher was born, Knox was head coach at Elwood City high school
and Pardee was a rookie with the Los Angeles Rams. When Cowher was learning to
walk, Levy was head coach at New Mexico State University. When cowher was 3,
Shula began coaching in the NFL. When Cowher was in first grade, Ditka earned
his first NFL championship ring with the Bears, and Gibbs was designing
offensive schemes with passmaster Don Coryell at San Diego State.
how can a young guy compete against men who were inventing and
ingesting football before he was born?? While Cowher was attending college
parties, Dan Reeves worked as an offensive coordinator in consecutive Super
Bowls with the Dallas Cowboys.
"Cowher was a crazy guy," said jim Richter, an offensive lineman of the
Buffalo Bills and a college teammate of Cowher's who will be playing in Super
Bowl XXVI today. "he was one of the fun guys to be with. The people he hung
out with, they'd break down doors, stay up late. He was the typical college
football player. It is hard to picture him as being the coach over the players
and having to discipline them and that kind of stuff. It's hard to see it."
Cowher is the youngest head coach of the Steelers since John Michelson,
33, was hired in 1948. (The Steelers had several coaches age 35 or younger in
the early days, including John "Blood" McNally). Cowher's resume says he
played with the Cleveland Browns and Philadelphia Eagles, and coached with the
Browns and the Kansas City Chiefs. He has worked for 12 seasons in the NFL.
People who know Cowher suggest his best assets cannot be revealed in a
resume. They believe he has many qualities that can make him competitive with
any of the NFL's coaches, regardless of their experience.
Look into his eyes
------------------
Passion.
"I remember the first day I met Bill," said Lou James, a boyhood friend
and high school teammate of Cowher's. "We were 8 or 9 years old and we got
into a fight in the alley behind his house. I whipped him that day and then I
hid from him. I can still see the look in his eyes. It was scary. he hates
to lose. he gets so intense and you can see the intensity in his eyes. They
say Mike Singletary has the most imposing eyes in football, but they can't be
any more imposing than Cowher's.
Those eyes also made impressions in high school. "You would look at
him in the huddle and he'd be so intense, so emotional, that there would
actually be tears in his eyes," said Bill Ellsworth, also a Carlynton High
School teammate.
Cowher's college teammates at North carolina State saw more than tears.
"We laughed when we said it, but we thought he was borderline insane when it
came to football," said Brad Holt, a college teammate who played at Beaver high
School. "there was something about his eyes. You could see the fire in them.
If you looked into his eyes as he walked onto the football field, it was like
he was leaving the planet. He was the most intense player I'd ever seen."
The eyes, the passion, the intensity did not diminish when cowher began
his coaching career with the Cleveland browns.
"We had a nickname for him in Cleveland," said former Browns safety,
Ray Ellis, who was a teammate of Cowher's with the Philadelphia Eagles. "We
called him 'The Face'. Frank Minnifield named him. It had to do with the
intensity we saw in his face. During the game, you would look over at him and
he looked like a big, old, mean grizzly, stalking and prowling.
Labors of love
--------------
Cowher's passion was fueled by preparation and knowledge. He has only
been on the planet for 34 years, but he has been taking notes most of the time.
"Even as a boy, Bill was a student of the game," said Ed Hamer, one of
Cowher's youth league coaches with the Little Cougars in Crafton. "he was all
ears if you were talking about football. He soaked up everything like a dry
sponge and he never forgot anything you told him."
At Carlynton high school, Cowher often stayed after practice to watch
game films with defensive coordinator Bill Yost. He went to yost during study
halls to watch films or talk about defensive schemes. "he was always asking
questions. He always wanted to know more about what we were doing adn why we
were doing it," said Yost.
At North Carolina, he continued his film study. "The offensive
linemen's meeting began an hour and a half before anybody else on the team, but
whenever we got there, we'd find Bill, sitting in the dark with the projector,
running game film back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, looking for
some little edge, some little insight that was going to help him during the
game," said Holt.
"Bill couldn't rlax, couldn't think about anything else, until he was
sure he knew everything he needed to know for the next game," said Russ Matt,
Cowher's north carolina teammate and rommate from Jeannette.
As a player and coach in the NFL, Cowher continued to rely heavily on
preparation.
"Bill always paid tremendous attention to detail. He worked very, very
hard at preparing himself mentally. his determination to gain every edge
possible was extraordinary," said Frank Gansz, who was special teams coach with
the Eagles when Cowher played.
Kaye Cowher, who met her husband in college and married him in 1983,
said Cowher's typical workday with the KC Chiefs ended at 10 pm Monday, 3 am
Tuesday, 1 am Wednesday, 11 pm Thursday, and 7 pm Friday. Sundays, he would
sometimes look at the game films after the game.
"he's the type of person who has to be sure he's done everything
possible," said Kaye Cowher.
Leader of the packs
-------------------
Preparation and passion made Cowher a leader as a player.
he was elected captain and most valuable player by his teammates in
college. he was elected special teams captain after one season with the Browns
and voted special teams MVP after one season with the Eagles.
"Bill was probably as well respected by his peers as any player I've
been around," said Marty Schottenheimer, head coach of the Chiefs.
his influence was first felt on Hawthorne Street in Crafton. he talked
his friends into lifting weights with him. He talked them into going to
football camp at IUP(Indiana University of Pennsylvania) with him. cowher went
on to an NFL career and three of his buddies from the neighborhood--Lou James,
Jim James, and Tom Hennessey--went on to play for national championship teams
at Westminster College.
"Bill was the leader from the beginning and everybody else followed,"
said Lou James.
"On the field, Bill did every thing he could to make sure the rest of
us knew what we were doing. he wanted everybody involved in every play, even
if he had to pick you up by the seat of your pants and throw you at the
quarterback," said Ellsworth.
"He never said much when the coaches were around, but when we got on
the field, he did all the talking and everybody listened to him," said Jim
James. "I remember we didn't have a goal-line defense, we'd never practiced
it, so he made one up in the huddle at Peters Township. He just said, 'You get
down, You get Down, You get down.' he positioned all of us, and it worked."
At North carolina State, Cowher was a three-year starter and twice led
the team in tackles. The defense was driven by the inside linebackers: Cowher
and Kyle Wescoe. they were called butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and
Starsky and Hutch. They took turns calling plays and making plays, but Cowher
took control in the toughest times.
"Bill always knew the right thing to say and the right time to say it,"
said Wescoe. "When things were going good, he wouldn't say much. But when
things got tough, he could motivate his fellow teammates very easily. He was a
great motivational-type person."
The flip side
-------------
Passionate. Driven. Possessed. Intense. Focused. Those adjectives
are used again and again when friends and acquaintances begin talking about
Cowher. The initial image is of a man consumed by the game. But that isn't
accurate.
Neighbors refer to him as gentle and kind and polite, a guy who could
sit on the front porch and talk about anything but football. Teammates say he
was demanding and driven on the field, but considerate and relaxed away from
it.
"He was a good-hearted person. he would do anything for you. he was
very easy-going. he liked to get away from the game sometimes," said Matt.
"We loved to shoot pool or go to places where the regular crowd
gathered," Wescoe said. "We liked fitting in with people who weren't so
concerned with people."
Kaye Cowher played on North Carolina State's nationally ranked women's
basketball team. She was attracted to Cowher because he wasn't like many of
the other athletes she had met on campus.
"I knew he was a big football player on campus, but he was different.
He was sweet and gentle and very nice."
Through the years, although the demands of football have intensified,
Cowher has maintained the separation between football and family.
"You should see him with our little girls. He's so gentle. If he wins
a big game, or loses a big game, our girls would never know it from him. When
he comes through the door, he doesn't bring football with him."
The Cowhers have three daughters: Megan,5; Lauren, 4; Lindsay, 1.
"Megan played soccer this year and Bill made it to a lot of her games.
Every thought he would have to be down on the sidelines coaching, but he sat
and watched and smiled."
The years and the family may have mellowed Cowher. he's not the wild
man that Richter remembers from college. He doesn't sprint down the sideline
as he did as a special teams coach with the Browns. But he's still the same
person, with the same qualities, he was at Carlynton and North Carolina State
and Cleveland and Philadelphia. his passion and his preparation and his
leadership ability are as potent as ever.
"My belief is that things have to be thoroughly done," he said. "I be
lieve the best chance you have for success is that every one have a true
understanding of what's expected of them. If that means spending time at 2
a.m., we will do it....It is not just talent that can get you someplace. If
you make a commitment, and you believe in it, you can obtain anything."
The philosophy is the same. And "The Face" is the same.
"I watched him on the sideline during playoff games and he has calmed
down a little," said Holt. "But did you see his eyes? You can still see the
fire in them."
JaKe
|
35.521 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Tue Jan 28 1992 09:07 | 2 |
|
If Furness is the DL coach, where does this leave Joe Greene?
|
35.522 | Unemployed, no doubt | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jan 28 1992 09:42 | 1 |
|
|
35.523 | Jake, You Like The P-Name ?? | QUASER::HUNTER | JaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !! | Tue Jan 28 1992 18:06 | 4 |
|
Yet another Bum to carry on the Losing tradition... ;^)
BG
|
35.524 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Tue Jan 28 1992 21:05 | 4 |
| At least you pay up on wagers!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.525 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Tue Jan 28 1992 22:19 | 25 |
|
>>If Furness is the DL coach, where does this leave Joe Greene?
Greene will be gone from the Steelers. He will probably catch on
somewhere else. He has been the Steelers DL coach for the lasted five
years.
On the radio here in Pgh, there are a lot of people calling in and
crying that Greene got porked in the whole matter. Personally, I'm sad
to see him go, BUT, the Steelers have given Cowher full say in who his
assistants are, AND, he cain't be expected to keep Greene on for
strictly sentimental reasons.
Wicky Wacky Wyche has said that he may have a job for Greene in Tampa.
I figure Mean Joe to land a head coaching job in 3-5 years, who knows,
maybe in Pittsburgh, even. He will have more experience than just
having been a Defensive line coach.
I could possibly see Cowher hiring Greene as Defensive Coordinator,
seeing as since Cowher himself was a DC, he will probably oversee the
defense on the Steelers more than the offense.
JaKe
|
35.526 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Jan 29 1992 11:54 | 4 |
| Mean Joe back in pitt in 3-5 years as head coach? Given up on
Cohwer already JaKe?
Tim
|
35.527 | fyi | LUNER::BROOKS | DickButkus,BobGriese,BobKnight? | Wed Jan 29 1992 12:07 | 2 |
| BTW, Dennis Green is aking Tony Dungy if he wants the DC job in
Minnesota ....
|
35.528 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:36 | 7 |
| I was under the impression that Dungy (sp?) had already accepted the
position!!
No?
Nelly
|
35.529 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Wed Jan 29 1992 18:02 | 11 |
|
>> Mean Joe back in pitt in 3-5 years as head coach? Given up on
>>Cohwer already JaKe?
Nah, just when he proves to be EXTREMELY sucessful NBC will offer him
Beau Coup bucks to jump to the booth, leaving Greene his opening.
Cowher BTW has a 4 year contract.
JaKe
|
35.530 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Thu Jan 30 1992 15:48 | 8 |
| The Steelers announced today that Bill Cowher has hired Dom Kapers as
defensive coordinator. Kapers was with New Orleans for the lasted 6
years as secondary coach.
JaKe
|
35.531 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Thu Jan 30 1992 21:32 | 5 |
| make that "Capers", not Kapers.
JaKe
|
35.532 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Thu Jan 30 1992 22:25 | 7 |
| Heard also that the Steelers are going to hire Marvin Lewis as their
special teams coach. Lewis has been outside linebackers coach at the
University of Pittsburgh recently, and worked with Cowher when he
coached at Pitt.
JaKe
|
35.533 | questions questions questions | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Fri Jan 31 1992 16:32 | 12 |
|
I know the season is a long way off but there is a certain amount of
eeriness concerning the teams future. This team appeared to be
somewhat talented but mired in an offensive system that was awkward and
complicated which also lead to the defense spending long stints on the
field which caused tiredness and giving up points. To see a totally
new staff without major experience(except O coor.) you have to wonder
what types of D and O to look for next year and will it take time such
as in a Dallas scenario(1-15) for the coaching to catch up.
Roy L. Quinn
|
35.534 | New staff will help more than it hurts | SHALOT::MEDVID | too sexy for my car | Fri Jan 31 1992 16:56 | 32 |
| Roy,
bottom line is that the Steelers were a bad "team" in the true sense of
the word. They managed to finish second in the division, but not
because of fantastic play; instead, Cleveland got real caught up in
thinking they could make the playoffs and instead ended up behind the
Steelers after the final week. Steelers beat them, sure, but it was
more a Browns fold than a Pittsburgh rejuvenation.
What I'm saying here is that there is talent on this team that was not
utilized to its potential, especially on offense. And as good a coach
as Noll was, he still couldn't bring it out. The hope is that the new
staff will tap the potential and create a team in the true sense of the
word.
I'm not filled with much optimism, unlike some other Brown-stained fan
is every year. I think the most telling point was made in a Gene
Collier article that JaKe posted a few months back. In it, it was
stated that Chuck Noll became a 9-5 coach; in his glory years, Noll
slept in his office during the football season. If that's an
ingredient to success (and I'm not sure it is) then everything you read
about Kowher points to a winning season.
If not, the team is no worse off than before.
Houston will still win the AFC Central next year (barring Moon getting
hurt). Pittsburgh and Cleveland will be dogging it out for second
place honors. Cinci has made the biggest mistake of any coach-seeking
franchise in the hiring of young Shula and will be in the cellar once
again.
--dan'l
|
35.535 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Fri Jan 31 1992 18:39 | 134 |
| As far as the team goes, here's how I see the talent:
QB--Brister- not a great QB but he's also not absolutely horrible,
either. Doubt his ability to win the "Big One" if he ever
was to get there.
O'Donnell--Jury still out. Showed glimmers of being the Steelers
saviour lasted year, but also made some dumb mistakes.
Bottom line on Neil is he lacks experience, but I think he
will be a good QB once he gets more playing time under his
belt.
Running Backs-With Worley and Foster, if both stay healthy(and keep
their noses clean, if'n ya know what I mean), the Steelers
have the potential to have a top-notch backfield. Add to
this Merrill Hoge and (guy from Penn State whose name
escapes me at this moment) + Warren Williams and the
Steelers are not hurting at running back, which will be
important nest season because both Cowher and Erhardt have
said they want to implement a power running game, with some
passing. The Steelers main focus will be the running game,
though.
Offensive Line--Truly offensive. The Steelers' offensive line lasted
year was pretty dismal. Tunch Ilkin has lost a step(if he
had it in the first place) and may have only a year or two
to go, and those will probably see him playing sparingly at
best because of increased problems with nagging injuries.
Rest of the line is poor to lousy. Tom Ricketts turns out
to be a bust. Carlton Haselrig shows brilliance, then
looks like sh_t for awhile.
Tight Ends--Strongest part of team. Eric Green, if he returns at 100%
after breaking his anklelasted year, will be one of the
best tight ends in the league. Keith Cash and Adrian
Cooper filled in admirably. Mike Mularkey will(or already
has) retire, and would like to sign on with the Steelers in
a coaching capacity. We'll see on him.
Recievers--Another weak spot. Louis Lipps is on the downward side of
his career, and never has shown the brilliance he had
before the 2 years of hamstring problems. Rookies Jeff
Graham and Ernie Mills were VERY UN-IMPRESSIVE in the
games in which they played. Graham looked like a waste of
money, failing on one play to stretch out and make a
"falling catch". Mills seemed to have grease coated hands.
Dwight Stone has good to great speed, but suffers from
bouts of the dropsies. The rest of the reciever corp is
average to slightly below average, AT BEST.
Kicking game--Anderson made 22 of 32 field goals this year, which is
a bad year for him, but should rebound next year. He's one
of the best there is. Dan Stryzinski(sp??) is an adequate
punter who doesn't kick them long, but gets great hang time
resulting in very low return numbers. His biggest problem
this year was dealing with the Steelers' abscence of a
qualified long-snapper.
Defensive line--Aaron Jones will get one more year, AT THE MOST. Jones
was forced to play in the 3-4, where his talents are NOT SUITED
He may play in a 4-3 alignment this year, whic, with his
speed and HOPEFULLY increased maturity, he is more suited for.
Keith Willis is getting old and slowing down. May have one
or 2 more years, tops. Gerald Williams played good this
past year and will probably start again next year. The
rest of the Steelers "D" line , Donald Evans, Craig Veasey,
etc. needs work.
Linebackers--Greg Lloyd and Jerrol Williams were good at putting
pressure on the QB's, although Lloyd tends to flap his
jaws too much and also gets too damned close to drawing the
personal foul calls. Bryan Hinkle needs a cane and walker
if he wants to continue playing. He had a good year but
has slowed odwn considerably and gets beat on pass routes
more and more each successive season. David Little doesn't
seem to play with the intensity he used to. Hardy
Nickerson, if he remains healthy, is solid.
Secondary--Woodson continues to be one of the best in the game. Thomas
Everett got beat time and time again lasted year. Richard
Shelton showed TONS of promise with his spot playing. His
3 int's of Kosar, plus the "nestea plunge" were nothing
short of great. David Johnson also showed signs of slowing
by continually getting beat. Larry Griffin is average.
One plus for the team next season will be N_ M_RE J_E WALT_N. I have
no idea who will be at QB, but Brister wants a long term contract at
~$2 million per. Lot of money for a guy who still cain't control
HIMSELF on the field, let alone the rest of the offense.
The Steelers need to get offensive lineman who cain give whoever is QB
3-4 seconds to throw. Plus, the running game will go nowhere without
bolstering the O line. The "D" line could use some help as the
opposing QB's felt very little pressure last season.
Oh well, it's a long wait til July.
JaKe
may
|
35.536 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Sun Feb 02 1992 07:44 | 26 |
| Steelers Plan "B" Unprotected List
Warren Williams RB
Chris Calloway WR
David Little LB
Keith Willis DE
Delton Hall CB
Dan Stryzinski P
Keith Cash TE
Bryan Hinkle LB
Terry Long G
Dean Caliguire G
Dean Dingman G
Larry Griffin S
Kevin Smith S
Rob McGovern LB
Jeff Brady LB
Sean Vincent CB
Rick Strom QB
Mike Mularkey TE
Brian Blankenship G
JaKe
|
35.537 | | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | | Mon Feb 03 1992 07:44 | 2 |
|
All a bunch of No-names.
|
35.538 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:43 | 13 |
| Hal,
You've got your head buried so deep in the Browns that it's not
surprising that you've heard of none of the Steelers listed!!!
To anyone with knowledge of players NOT on the Browns....what's
happened to Delton Hall? A coupl'a years ago he was expected to do
great things....was he injured this past year? I'd think that someone
would take a chance with him via Plan B!!
Nelly
|
35.539 | Hall & Brady | SHALOT::MEDVID | the illusion is deep | Mon Feb 03 1992 13:07 | 19 |
|
> To anyone with knowledge of players NOT on the Browns....what's
> happened to Delton Hall? A coupl'a years ago he was expected to do
> great things....was he injured this past year? I'd think that someone
> would take a chance with him via Plan B!!
Hall has lived up to his billing. He is a headhunter. But that's
about it. No sense in having a tough hitter in the secondary if the
receiver is five yards past him downfield.
Any idea how the Steelers came up with this list? Afterall, the new
coaching staff really doesn't know these guys.
BTW, expect Jeff Brady, if not signed by the Steelers, to be a major
player on someone else's team. Steelers Digest did an article on him
mid-season titled "Good Enough To Start." Actually, I'm surprised
Olsavsky didn't lose his job to Brady by game 8.
--dan'l
|
35.540 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Feb 04 1992 08:12 | 3 |
| Joe Greene is now going to be Defensive Line coach of the Dolphins.
John
|
35.541 | | SALEM::SCALZO | The Sky is Crying | Tue Feb 04 1992 09:02 | 8 |
| re -1
I like it!!
FWIW
jeff
|
35.542 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Just DON'T light a match!! | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:34 | 13 |
| Looks like Tim Worley is at it again.
Read in the paper today where he has missed 2 mandatory drug tests in
the lasted month. He faces a possible 1 year suspension now for
missing these tests.
All that talent and no brains to go with it.
Wonder if he's related to Barry Bonds????
JaKe
|
35.543 | what a waste of talent | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:46 | 4 |
|
Worley has a load of talent. Involvement with drugs is one possible
explanation why he hasn't reached the level of play that was expected
of him when he was drafted.
|
35.544 | Steelers get some help on Offensive Line | CELTIK::JACOB | A double flutter blast!! | Wed Mar 11 1992 21:41 | 9 |
|
The Steelers signed Plan B free agent Duval Love, formerly of the LA
Rams to a 3 year $1.8 million contract.
Love is an offensive guard, something the Steelers are in dire need of.
JaKe
|
35.545 | -Very few plan B moves-Very few plan B movesVery few plan B moves | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 19:12 | 6 |
| The steelers seem to make very few moves with plan B free agency. I
would have suspected that there would have been a few free agent moves
on the ol. Duval Love will certainly help. The released Terry Long
though or to be correct didn't invite him back.
Roy L.
|
35.546 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Thursday is D-Day | Wed Apr 01 1992 21:16 | 10 |
| Overall, the Steelers have signed 5 plan "B" free agents, and they're
working at the lasted minute trying to sign QB Chuck Long.
I know they've signed Duvall Love, plus the punter from Tampa Bay whose
place Dan Stryzinski took, plus some Stan someoneorother from the
Patriots, but I don't have all of the names available right now.
JaKe
|
35.547 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:04 | 8 |
| Punter Mark Royals
OL Stan Clayton
HTH,
Nelly
|
35.548 | Draft needs and Inklings | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Tue Apr 21 1992 18:44 | 6 |
| Jake,
Any word on what the steeler brain trust think they need and are
thinking about in Sunday's Draft???
Roy L.
|
35.549 | From Steelers Digest | SHALOT::MEDVID | another who has maddening views | Tue Apr 21 1992 18:59 | 35 |
| Here's what I've picked up from the latest issue of Steeler's Digest.
In an article titled "Cowher answers fans' questions" this Q&A:
Q. Will offensive line be the most important need to fill in the
upcoming draft?
A. I don't believe so. I've looked at our offensive line, and we've
aquired some players through Plan B, and based on that, along wiht some
of the players we've been able to keep -- Dean Dingman, Dean Caliguire,
Ariel Solomon, Tom Ricketts, Justin Strzelcsyk -- I think we've got
some young players we can develop. � I certainly would not pass up an
offensive lineman if a good one was there. But I don't think offensive
line is an area we need to go out right now and look to revamp. I
think our offensive line will lend itself to helping the players we
have, and our style of football will help offensive linemen in general.
Q. Long-snapping was a problem for the team in 1991. Will you sign a
long-snapper, or will you make do with the personnel already here?
A. We will find a long-snapper somewhere, somehow. It's somethign we
tried to address in Plan B, but it's something we are conscius of, and
we will aquire a guy who can long-snap.
Steelers Digest, in another article, thinks the Steelers will address
the following areas in the draft:
- defensive line
- secondary
- halfback
- offensive line
Hal tried hard. (tm)
--dan'l
|
35.550 | filler time | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Apr 21 1992 19:43 | 7 |
| Sheesh people talking about steeenkin football this time of year. This
is baseball time and NBA and NHL playoff time. Football is meant for
that short time of year when not much else is happenin' Otherwise it
doesn't serve much purpose.
The Crazy Met
|
35.551 | (8^)* | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Tue Apr 21 1992 19:49 | 13 |
|
>>Sheesh people talking about steeenkin football this time of year. This
>>is baseball time and NBA and NHL playoff time. Football is meant for
What's an NBA??? Does is stand fer "Nothin' But A__holes"????
What's a backsketball????
Inquiring mindless and all that
JaKe
|
35.552 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Apr 22 1992 00:31 | 6 |
| Jake,
I suggest you stick to answering questions in the ASK Jake note :-)
The Crazy Met
|
35.553 | SHould be a fun day, wheeling and deelings are in the makes | POPE::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Apr 22 1992 08:17 | 11 |
| Actually from mid june to august there usally no real sports on
TV.... I very much enjoy going to see the Sox's play but I just
cant watch baseball on TV. IF they changed it so each batter got
1 pitch then Id watch but when the same guy gets 7,8 or 9 pitches
3, balls 2, strikes, 3 or 4 fould tips its just too much.....
Id rather watch Golf or Tennis... and thats pretty bad.
The draft is this sunday, I hope Indy doesnt screw up again.
come on pats :-)
|
35.554 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Apr 22 1992 08:44 | 2 |
| Football is the only REAL sport. The others are just time fillers.
Denny
|
35.555 | | ROYALT::ASHE | She done knocked me down once... | Wed Apr 22 1992 10:04 | 2 |
| He's just mad because the last team associated with Pittsburgh was the
Pittsburgh Pisces... (The team from "The fish that saved Pittsburgh...)
|
35.556 | Let's get back to the Steelers anyhows | SHALOT::MEDVID | another who has maddening views | Wed Apr 22 1992 10:55 | 8 |
| > He's just mad because the last team associated with Pittsburgh was the
> Pittsburgh Pisces... (The team from "The fish that saved Pittsburgh...)
Hey, come on now. Robert Morris put up a most memorable
down-to-the-wire battle with UCLA in the tournament...NOT!
--dan'l
|
35.557 | Klingler Pitt---I hope it's a ploy | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Apr 22 1992 11:59 | 7 |
| After I posted a note yesterday about who the steelers might be looking
at in the draft, I got most discouraging news. Tom Donahoe Steeler
personnel director says the Steelers would take David Klingler if he is
still available when they pick. He seems to think that Klingler is a
franchise quarterback yeeesh!!!!
Roy L.
|
35.558 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Here's a story/Of a babe named Brady ... | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:03 | 5 |
| Klinger has 4.7 speed, a 32" vertical leap (yeah, I know, dunking
doesn't get you much in the NFL), and most importantly - an arm like a
cannon (I've seen him fire *flat* passes into the seams 40 yards
downfield with ease) ... the tools are there. But I don't know if the
coaching is (if he winds up in Pgh) ...
|
35.559 | No confidence in the sidearmers | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:23 | 6 |
| He also slings the ball sideways like Bernice and is likely to blast
that cannon into lineman helments in the NFL. I'm not saying he can't
be successful as by nfl standards Kosac has is rated high but I hate to
see him play.
Roy L.
|
35.560 | How many teams wish they had taken Marino instead? | SHALOT::MEDVID | another who has maddening views | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:40 | 11 |
| I seem to remember a few years ago a young Dan Marino having
spectacular years at Pitt, being talked up as the '82 Heisman front
runner, Jackie Sherrill leaving, Foge Fazio turning a great team into
nothing in no time, Marino having a poor senior season, 26 NFL teams
passing on him in the first round before Miami picked him, and Marino
becoming one of the best QB's in NFL history.
First part of that sounds very similar to the story of one David
Klingler.
--dan'l
|
35.561 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Apr 22 1992 13:43 | 2 |
| dan'l, you forgot the part about Marino's bum knee. Klinger doesn't
have an injury excuse.
|
35.562 | Injury ? No. But bad O-line and defense didn't help ... | LUNER::BROOKS | Here's a story/Of a babe named Brady ... | Wed Apr 22 1992 14:00 | 5 |
| No Mac, but Klinger played behind a pathetic offensive line, and I
don't care how good you are, I've yet to see a QB look goof throwing
from a prone position (I know - right Walt ? :-) ...
Doc
|
35.563 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Apr 22 1992 14:33 | 3 |
| ...but dan'l the Pats took Tony Eason and we all know he was 10x better
than Marino!
Denny 8^)
|
35.564 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 22 1992 14:36 | 5 |
| Small nit - it's Klingler, not Klinger.
John Hendry (who's sick of always having the "D" dropped from his last
name and being confused with a steel drivin' man, a horse and/or a
fashion designer)
|
35.565 | | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Wed Apr 22 1992 16:48 | 12 |
| --dan'l
I think Marino was gone from Pitt when Foge Fazio took over for his
short-lived stint as coach.
Marino's problems at Pitt in his senior year were due, in part, to a
penchant for nose candy. This info I got first hand from someone I
knew who was at Pitt during the same time period and hung in the same
crowd as Danny boy.
JaKe
|
35.566 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 22 1992 17:04 | 12 |
| Foge Fazio became head coach at Pitt in 1982. The reason I remember
about Sherrill being at Texas A&M is that the opening day of the 1982
season lives in infamy for all of us anti-Eagles. That day, the first
game of St Douglas of the Heights' sophomore season, Boston College
went down to Texas A&M and blasted the Aggies in Sherrill's debut as
head man in Aggieland. It began 3 years of infamy for those of us who
barf at the sight of maroon and gold.
In any event, Foge was Pitt head coach for Marino's senior year at
Pitt.
Ninj
|
35.567 | Surprised he never addressed the rumors while at school... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 22 1992 17:35 | 12 |
|
> Marino's problems at Pitt in his senior year were due, in part, to a
> penchant for nose candy. This info I got first hand from someone I
> knew who was at Pitt during the same time period and hung in the same
> crowd as Danny boy.
I was at CMU during this time and if this wasn't the truth then it was
only what 99% of the college scene believed to be the truth. Danny
Boy used to come up to the Beta house to party a bit...
glenn
|
35.568 | Fazio handed Marino to the Dolphins | SHALOT::MEDVID | another who has maddening views | Wed Apr 22 1992 17:40 | 14 |
| JaKe, it may have been Marino and an affection for cocaine, but it was
more Fazio than anything. After that season ended, players openly
stated how the team had lost drive and motivation continually
throughout the season. I remember reading one receiver's quote that
stated by the fifth game, if a ball was thrown high he wouldn't jump
for it for more fear of being hit than being yelled at by Fazio.
Under Sherrill these kids played with emotion and put their talent on
the line. Fazio took one of the best teams in the country back in '82
and destroyed it. Marino, bum knee and rumored drug problems or not,
could do nothing to keep the ship from sinking because the captain
didn't know how to sail.
--dan'l
|
35.569 | | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Wed Apr 22 1992 18:08 | 4 |
| I stand corrected.
JaKe
|
35.570 | Amp Lee would have excited me, but boring is better | SHALOT::MEDVID | Who's got segmented eyes? | Mon Apr 27 1992 13:43 | 15 |
| Not as exciting as Chuck Noll's first draft, but it looks like the
Cowher administration got some guys for the long haul:
1. Leon Searcy, ot, Miami
2. Levon Kirkland, lb, Clemson
3. Joel Steed, dt, Colorado
4. Charles Davenport, wr, NC State
5. Alan Haller, db, Michigan State
All needs were addressed in proper order it seems. Probably pick up
more linemen and a running back today.
Any info on these five is appreciated.
--dan'l
|
35.571 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Apr 27 1992 14:07 | 9 |
|
Yea, to draft is one thing...to sign 'em is another!
Let the 'games' begin!
bill..g.
|
35.572 | Could be a good one | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Apr 27 1992 14:20 | 6 |
| Davenport is a guy I thought was kind of intriguing from what I read
about him - he played QB for 3 and a half seasons before being switched
to WR, and Mel Kiper said he probably would've been a top 10 pick if he
had played WR for his full tenure at NCState.
Joe
|
35.573 | Surprised he was a 3rd round pick | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Apr 27 1992 14:22 | 17 |
| Any info on these five is appreciated.
The only one I'm familiar with is #3, Joel Steed, dt, Colorado.
He's a Denver native and was an all Big 8 nose tackle the last two tears.
You won't see many highlight films of him running over 2 or 3 blockers
on his way to smashing the QB. But you will see a lot of films of the
other teams not running in his direction. He was very solid in the middle
and was good at breaking up plays. He's strong but his biggest asset is
probably his quickness. Since he plugged up the middle so well, and
chased QB's and running backs from where they wanted to be, it
made it easier for the linebackers to make the big plays and get the
publicity.
All in all, he's a solid player but I didn't expect him to be drafted
until the 5th or 6th round.
Keith
|
35.574 | | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Mon Apr 27 1992 16:46 | 4 |
| I'll put in whatever info the paper has on the first five, tonite.
JaKe
|
35.575 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Apr 27 1992 17:06 | 8 |
| > Yea, to draft is one thing...to sign 'em is another!
> Let the 'games' begin!
Any bets on whether we'll hear Bill Cowher say "Leon who ?"
Keith
|
35.576 | | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Mon Apr 27 1992 17:20 | 13 |
| I doubt if Cowher say "Leon WHo? He may question the guy's will to
play in the NFL, but he won't use Noll-isms.
Cowher has started off with more appeal to the public than Noll did.
Noll refused any kind of radio show, 'cept for the 5 minute thang on
game day.
Cowher will have a 1-2 hour show(presumably WITH Myron Cope) once a
week during the regular season.
Plus, he's been showing up at fund raisers all over the city.
JaKe
|
35.577 | | CELTIK::JACOB | NO JUNK....what bunk!!!! | Mon Apr 27 1992 22:08 | 60 |
| THUMBNAIL SKETCHES OF STEELERS' CHOICES(choices 1-5)
from The Pittsburgh Press, 4-27-1992
Leon Searcy, No. 1(11th Overall Selection), T/G, Miami, 6-3 1/4, 296 lbs.
Extremely quick athlete with outstanding strangth and excellent
hand-eye coordination. Regarded as one of the nation's premier pass protectors.
Moves well in the open and is known for his aggressive nature. Possesses
massive legs, squatting 600 lbs, and has size 17 EEE shoes. Ran 5.14 in the
40-yard dash. Three year starter at tackle who has been projected as a guard
in the NFL because of his height. 1991 first team All-American by Football
Writers Association. All Big East Conference first-team selection. Played
last season at quick(left) tackle as Hurricanes averaged 441.3 yds per game.
Crecited with 68 knockdowns and 84 percent grade for blocking consistency. As
a junior, had 88 percent grade for blocking consistency and started every game
at right tackle. Moved into starting lineup as a sophomore at right tackle and
earned praise as he developed into team's premier pass protector. In addition
to football, lettered in track, finishing fourth in conference and district
finals in shot put and discus. Agent is Marvin Powell.
Levon Kirkland, No. 2(38th Overall) ILB, Clemson, 6-0 1/2, 240 lbs.
Rugged open field tackler who excells as a blitzer. Explosive hitter
who is hard to contain in one-on-one situations and is a punishing outside
penetrator. Played outside linebacker all four years but played inside
linebacker in Hula and Senior bowls and excelled. Has solid pass coverage
skills and a smooth change of direction. Timed at 4.84 in the 40. Has 6.62
power ratio(strength based on body weight), the best total by a Clemson
linebacker in 7 years. Bench presses 385 lbs with an 800 lb leg sled. Has 32
1/2 inch vertical jump. Third on team with 67 tackles, 5.5 sacks, and 12
tackles for losses. Recovered 2 fumbles, deflected 6 passes, and had 15 QB
pressures. 4 year starter. Was MVP of 1989 Gator Bowl against West Va. with 9
tackles, 2 sacks, and 3 stops for losses.
Joel Steed, No. 3(67th Overall), NT, Colorado, 6-2, 285.
Anchor of the Colorado defensive line and one of the top nose guards in
the country. Spectacular run defender with great agility for a player his
size. Keeps his feet when hit low and has quickness to spin off blockers. One
of the stongest players on the team with a 425-lb bench press and 800-lb hip
sled. Timed at 5.14 in the 40.
Charles Davenport No. 4(94th Overall) N.C. State, 6-3 1/2, 206.
Fine all-around athlete who return to his natural position after
playing QB his junior year. Tall and slender reciever with a long stride in
the open. Has terrific ability and deep acceleration. Elusive runner after
the catch with a great reach that allows him to grab the high pass. Will
likely be considered a possession reciever in the Steelers offense. Very
effective in running the reverse and has good spin moves to escape defenders.
Ran 4.57 in the 40. Led team with 33 receptions for 558 yards and 4 TD's.
Allen Haller, No. 5(123rd overall) CB, Michigan State, 5-10 3/4, 177 lbs.
Tough defender who has experience at cornerback and safety. 3-year
starter at CB who moved to free safety during senior season. Good cover man
who has good speed and strength and has strong run support. Very Smart Player.
Timed at 4.48 in the 40 and was a sprinter for 3 years for the Michigan State
track team. Projected as good special teams player and CB and/or nickel back
in secondary./ Made 77 tackles last season, his 3rd as a starter.
JaKe
|
35.578 | Steelers drafted some great words | SHALOT::HUNT | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Tue Apr 28 1992 10:25 | 10 |
| � Extremely quick athlete ... aggressive nature ... rugged open field
� tackler ... explosive hitter ... punishing outside penetrator ...
� spectacular run defender ... with great agility ... for a player his size
� ... fine all-around athlete ... has terrific ability ... possession
� receiver ... good cover man ...
Filter all this through that NFL Draft Translation Guide we saw lasted
week and you have some serious chuckles in Steel Town.
Bob Hunt
|
35.579 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Tue Apr 28 1992 12:25 | 8 |
| re-1
Agree, but its that way for every team.
Does anyone have an average of how many drafties are actually kept by
a team?
Tim
|
35.580 | Steelers filling all the holes | SHALOT::MEDVID | Who's got segmented eyes? | Tue Apr 28 1992 13:33 | 19 |
| 7 - Russ Campbell, TE, Kansas St.
7 - Scottie Graham, RB, Ohio St.
8 - Darren Perry, DB, Penn St.
8 - Hesham Ismail, G, Florida
8 - Nate williams, DT, Mississippi St.
9 - Elnardo Webster, LB, Rutgers
10 - Mike Saunders, RB, Iowa
11 - Kendall Gammons, G, Pittsburg St.
12 - Cornelius Benton, QB, U Conn.
If Eric Green and Adrian Cooper, the two best tight ends in the NFL
right now, didn't spell the end of Mike Mularky I would think that the
drafting of a third monster in the seventh round does. Don't know
anything about Campbell, but he must be something for the Steelers to
want to grab him already having Big Green and Coop.
Any info on these guys is, again, appreciated.
--dan'l
|
35.581 | Yep, he's a good one | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:03 | 20 |
| > 7 - Russ Campbell, TE, Kansas St.
> Don't know anything about Campbell, but he must be something for the
> Steelers to want to grab him already having Big Green and Coop.
> Any info on these guys is, again, appreciated.
I've seen Campbell play a couple of times. Since he played for Kansas State,
the doormat of the Big 8 until last year, it was ussually hard to get
the ball to him. But once the ball was thrown anywhere near him, he ussually
made a good catch and was pretty good running with it also. It's too bad
he had such a lousy team around him for most of his college career.
Otherwise he may have gotten more publicity. I also remember watching
him play in the Japan bowl. They threw to him often and he was very effective
in helping the team. In fact, he was probably the standout receiver in that
game. I see his strongest asset as being able to get open and to catch the
ball. But I don't see him as the type of guy that can run over tacklers
and punish the defensive backs like Cooper and Greene.
Keith
|
35.582 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:13 | 12 |
| There is actually a pretty high turnover in the NFL each year - about
25%. On the average, a career lasts 4 years or less. I couldn't tell
you, though, how many of the guys drafted each year on average play
long enough to reach the 4 year mark. I'm willing to bet it's less
than 100 out of the 336 taken each year.
Drafting is an art, not a science. At best, it's a crapshoot. The
work scouting departments do in evaluating players is at best only an
attempt to improve the odds. It's not as bad as baseball though, where
even fewer draftees make it every year.
John
|
35.583 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Prince > Madonna | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:41 | 3 |
| Is it me, or did this draft seem to have less so-called 'impact player'
talent ? Not to mention what seemed to be a glut of linemen and
linebackers taken ?
|
35.584 | Did Cohwer keep J_e Walt_n ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | Prince > Madonna | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:42 | 1 |
|
|
35.585 | his ole buddy gave him a job | CNTROL::CHILDS | will forgive us now, for wasting the dawn | Tue Apr 28 1992 15:26 | 6 |
|
nope he's in Philly now to help retard Randall's progress....
;^)
mike
|
35.586 | Parade in January - 2093 ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Twentyfive or 6 to 4 ... | Tue Apr 28 1992 16:15 | 2 |
| Oh no .... he *will* retard RC's game ... about the only guy who will
benefit will be Keith Jackson.
|
35.587 | | CELTIK::JACOB | NO JUNK..whadda buncha BUNK!!! | Tue Apr 28 1992 16:51 | 9 |
| Steelers new OC is ron Erhardt(sp?).
Erhardt was on Myron COpe's radio show lasted night and stated that the
offense will be a power back style offense, with lotsa blocking and
possession type stuff by the tight ends. Mularkey has stated that he
will probably retire cause of his knees, and would like to go into
coaching.
JaKe
|
35.588 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Where'll we get L.A.LAW Reports?? | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:25 | 9 |
|
>>11 - Kendall Gammons, G, Pittsburg St.
Rumor has it that Gammons was taken because he is a very good
"long-snapper". His play at other locations on the offensive line is
said to be fair at best.
JaKe
|
35.589 | should have studied | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Apr 29 1992 18:17 | 4 |
| Just heard the Worley was suspended from the NFL for "at least" 1 year.
He failed to show up at a couple of urine tests.
TTom
|
35.590 | Worley go to the Barry Bonds school of thought | CELTIK::JACOB | Gimme a beer and a junk note | Wed Apr 29 1992 22:16 | 11 |
|
Worley says he missed the urine tests because he and some fellow NFL
players decided to go to the NCAA's.
I sure hope he had one helluva good time cause with being suspended
without pay, he's going to miss out and more than a million $$$
in pay.
JaKe
|
35.591 | Steelers 92 Schedule | SHALOT::MEDVID | i can't lick that far | Thu May 07 1992 12:49 | 18 |
|
9/6 @Houston
9/13 NY Jets
9/20 @San Diego
9/27 @Green Bay
10/4 open
10/11 @Cleveland
10/19 Cincinnati (Monday Night)
10/25 @Kansas City
11/1 Houston
11/8 @Buffalo
11/15 Detroit
11/22 Indianapolis
11/29 @Cincinnati
12/6 Seattle
12/13 @Chicago
12/20 Minnesota
12/27 Cleveland
|
35.592 | My picks | SHALOT::MEDVID | i can't lick that far | Thu May 07 1992 13:01 | 23 |
| Pittsburgh got away with a pretty easy home schedule. If they can win
some of those home games and not get upset on the road, they could go
10-6. Just so I don't get accused of Halpocrisy(tm), here's my picks to
justify that prediction:
9/6 @Houston L 0-1
9/13 NY Jets L 0-2
9/20 @San Diego L 0-3
9/27 @Green Bay W 1-3
10/4 open
10/11 @Cleveland W 2-3
10/19 Cincinnati (Monday Night) W 3-3
10/25 @Kansas City L 3-4
11/1 Houston W 4-4
11/8 @Buffalo L 4-5
11/15 Detroit W 5-5
11/22 Indianapolis W 6-5
11/29 @Cincinnati W 7-5
12/6 Seattle W 8-5
12/13 @Chicago L 8-6
12/20 Minnesota W 9-6
12/27 Cleveland W 10-6
|
35.593 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Thu May 07 1992 18:28 | 1 |
| Fairly easy IMO.
|
35.594 | UPI: Woodson and brother arrested | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu May 21 1992 13:54 | 26 |
| Subject: Steeler Rod Woodson, brother arrested
Date: Thu, 21 May 92 7:51:13 PDT
FORT WAYNE, Ind. (UPI) -- Police arrested Pittsburgh Steelers
cornerback Rod Woodson and his brother, who fought in their parents home
about whether to remove life support from their terminally ill father.
Woodson, 27, and his mother, Linda, had agreed life support should be
removed, but expected the football player's brother, Jamie, 28, to
object violently when he learned of their decision, they told officers.
They called police to the scene Tuesday night as a precaution, but
things got out of hand anyway.
Officers said Jamie punched Rod in the face and the two policemen on
hand were hit by both brothers. The officers eventually calmed, arrested
and jailed the brothers.
Preliminary charges of aiding in battery to a police officer and
resisting arrest were brought against Rod Woodson. Jamie was charged
with battery to Rod and to an officer and resisting arrest.
They appeared in court Wednesday. Rod Woodson, a former Purdue
University star, was released on $1,500 bond; Jamie on $2,000 bond.
A deputy prosecutor said the Allen County prosecutor's office wanted
72 hours to review the incident before bringing formal charges. The
brother's next court appearance, officials said, could be as soon as
Friday but would likelier be Tuesday.
Police said the ailing father is in a Fort Wayne hospital, but they
lacked details on his ailment or condition. He became ill sometime
during the past year.
|
35.595 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Thu May 21 1992 14:17 | 5 |
| re-1 Thats to bad. That kinda of decision has got to be tough.
Some close friends of mine had to make that decision last week. I hope
they work it out and do the right thing.
tim
|
35.596 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | PC's 'R Us | Thu May 21 1992 14:34 | 6 |
| As one that has been through what the Woodson's have been through, I
hope that the police and judge are lenient. When someone dear is
obviously suffering, it is difficult at best to keep one's cool when
deciding whether to terminate life support for a loved one.
Mark.
|
35.597 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Losing it from all the right places | Wed Jun 17 1992 20:00 | 10 |
| The Steelers signed Walter Brister to a one year + option contract
yesterday. Other terms have not been disclosed. Brister had surgery
on his bad knee in Feb. but is expected to be in mini-camp at the end
of the month.
The Steelers also signed Hardy Nickerson to a one year contract
yesterday.
JaKe
|
35.598 | $1.3 mil not bad for #2 stringer | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Jun 18 1992 11:33 | 6 |
| Atlanta Journal says $1.3 mill plus incentives that could make it a $2
mill deal. Still not bad for a guy who ended up as a second stringer
last year.
Roy L.
|
35.599 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Thanks for charging us for your screw up! | Thu Jun 18 1992 16:40 | 1 |
| Marc Wilson all over again
|
35.600 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Jun 29 1992 16:51 | 23 |
| What's new with the Steelers ? Are they having any luck signing their
draft choices ? It looks like Cowher has taken some major steps (plan B
and drafting Leon Searcy) to improve their biggest weakness, the offensive
line. So far, I like what he's done but we won't know how successful he's
been until they play a few games this fall.
A few months ago, I put in my opinion of Joel Steed, their 3rd round draft
pick. I was surprised they drafted him so high. I expected him to go in the
6th or 7th round. Recently, I watched a tape of an old Colorado/Nebraska
game when Steed was a sophmore. In that game, Steed looked awesome. Then
I learned, that at the end of his junior year, he was picked by many people
to be a 1st round pick the next year. Well, the summer before his senior
year he got some rare disease and started the season 40 lbs below his normal
playing weight. Then he broke his hand and later hurt his foot. Thus,
he had less playing time and wasn't as effective his senior year. None of
these problems were career threatening and he's now fully recovered. I've
heard one draft expert say that he was a wasted 3rd round pick and another
draft expert say that he may be one of the biggest steals in the draft.
After watching that tape of him as a sophmore, I'm more optimistic that
he can make some major contributions playing defensive tackle or nose tackle
for the Steelers.(which is an area where they do need help).
Keith
|
35.601 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Sun-ripened for Mildness! | Mon Jul 06 1992 18:23 | 6 |
| Searcy remains unsigned.
Mike Mularkey(TE) was put on waivers.
JaKe
|
35.602 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Sun-ripened for Mildness! | Tue Jul 21 1992 16:57 | 15 |
| Don't have much news on the Steelers since the damned newspaper is
still on strike, BUT, they plan to be printing a paper starting maybe
Friday, so maybe nexted week, I cain get some updates.
Barry Foster, who is under contract until after this year, still has
not shown up in camp. The Steelers have evidently told him stay away
much longer, and he might as well never return, as the new offense
supposedly won't need any feature back, whatever that means.
Top 2 or 3 picks are still unsigned, Searcy reportedly because of the
"slotting" process in determining how much a guy gets by looking at the
guy picked right ahead of him's contract.
JaKe
|
35.603 | What we need is an offense with no feature QB | SHALOT::MEDVID | dancin' pretzels | Tue Jul 21 1992 17:39 | 20 |
| > Barry Foster, who is under contract until after this year, still has
> not shown up in camp. The Steelers have evidently told him stay away
> much longer, and he might as well never return, as the new offense
> supposedly won't need any feature back, whatever that means.
Here we go again. This has shades of Chuck Noll all over it. For
once, I'm on the athlete's side. Barry Foster has run his heart out
for Pittsburgh on the contract he signed as a hardship rookie. He is
one of the most talented players on the offense. What's Pittsburgh's
problem with giving the kid what he deserves? Or is he asking way too
much?
No feature back? I guess that means I can suit up and be at St.
Vincents for a tryout, huh? This scares me.
BTW, I heard that Kowher was in a car wreck last week. True? What's
the scoop?
--dan'l
|
35.604 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Sun-ripened for Mildness! | Tue Jul 21 1992 20:11 | 24 |
|
>>once, I'm on the athlete's side. Barry Foster has run his heart out
>>for Pittsburgh on the contract he signed as a hardship rookie. He is
>>one of the most talented players on the offense. What's Pittsburgh's
>>problem with giving the kid what he deserves? Or is he asking way too
>>much?
One fact stands out through each side of the story, Barry Foster IS
UNDER CONTRACT for one more year. Who's he think he is, Mike
Merriweather???? (8^)*
>>BTW, I heard that Kowher was in a car wreck last week. True? What's
>>the scoop?
Nothing but a minor fender bender. No injuries, 'cept egos that was
hurt.
BTW, on Myron Cope's radio show tonight he said Cowher has set a weight
ceiling of 275 for Eric Green. When asked if he thinks Green cain get
to 275, Cowher replied that he (Green) will reach 275 by this weekend.
JaKe
|
35.605 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jul 22 1992 15:02 | 10 |
|
re: foster
I also read some quotes from Foster in USA TODAY that were not
to favorable for Steeler management. It all came out after the
NFL trial where the owners salary and profit/loss statements were made
public.
bill..g.
|
35.606 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Aug 04 1992 16:39 | 18 |
| The Steelers signed Searcy, so he's now in camp.
All Steeler draft picks have now been signed and there are 4 veterans
still holding out, Louis Lipps, Carnell Lake, Thomas Everett, and Tunch
Ilkin.
Steelers firsted pre-season game is Saturday at Three Rivers Stadium
and today I gots a call on the tellyfone axing if me and Mrs. JaKe
wanted to attend FOR FREE!!
Hot Damn, free tickets, in a corporate box, food and drunk, er, drink
provided, wonder if'n they gots a waterbed in there, too???
(8^)*
Oh well, back to work
JaKe
|
35.607 | So Barry reported, eh? | SHALOT::MEDVID | there is really no-one left | Tue Aug 04 1992 16:56 | 5 |
| JaKe, from your note can I presume that Mr. Foster came to his legal
senses and reported to camp...unlike Mr. Merriweather or Mr.
Washington?
--dan'l
|
35.608 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Aug 04 1992 17:06 | 6 |
| Yeah, Foster has been in camp for a week or two, don't know exactly
when, cause I was out of town, and there still ain't any newspapers
here that are worth a damn, so cain't tell ya exactly when.
JaKe
|
35.609 | Must be some good West Virginny papers around! | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 04 1992 17:09 | 1 |
|
|
35.610 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | there is really no-one left | Tue Aug 04 1992 17:12 | 5 |
| > -< Must be some good West Virginny papers around! >-
You mean the Mom and Pop variety, better known there as Brother and
Sister.
|
35.611 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Aug 04 1992 18:03 | 38 |
|
JaKe...
the
Steelers
are
going ------------------------------------------------.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v
DDDDD OOOOOO W W N N !!!
D D O O W W NN N !!!
D D O O W W W N N N !!!
D D O O W W W W N N N !!!
D D O O W W W W N NN
DDDDD OOOOOO W W N N !!!
BTW, how do you like the new noting style, commonly referred to as
iceNOTES (c).
|
35.612 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Aug 04 1992 18:44 | 13 |
|
Where, DOWN with the Brown(spot)s(tm)????
>>BTW, how do you like the new noting style, commonly referred to as
>>iceNOTES (c).
Just like a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan, all hype and no content!!!!
JaKe
|
35.613 | exit | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Aug 04 1992 19:28 | 19 |
|
Its
all
blue
smoke
and
mirrors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
|
35.614 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Aug 04 1992 19:31 | 10 |
| Lessee, Groaner, you're just COPYING the style that Hal used the first
year or two he was in here, nothing original. How fitting, how
fitting.
Re blue smoke and mirrors, nah I doubt it, more like you're just
blowing smoke out your....er I better not continue this sentence cause
it could get me set hidden for the first time in ages.
JaKe
|
35.615 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 05 1992 08:46 | 3 |
| Well, we only have to read the 1st line a his notes now, that's
refreshing!
Denny
|
35.616 | In a dilemma(sp?) | CELTIK::JACOB | Sun-ripened for Mildness! | Thu Aug 06 1992 17:26 | 15 |
| HELP!!!!
Anybody know a babysitter that travels???????
I needs a babysitter for Saturday night. If'n we don't get one, we
don't go to the game!!!!
Saturday should be a most ecksallent night, though. Going to go down
to Pittsburgh earlier in the day and take in some of the Three Rivers
Regatta, including the 25 lap Formula 1 boat races, then to the Steeler
game, then a big fireworks and laser show at the "Point" after the
game.
JaKe
|
35.617 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Fri Aug 07 1992 17:45 | 33 |
| Do you believ this sh_t!!!
Had free admission to the Steeler game tomorrow night, and cain't go
cause we cain't find a babysitter!!!!!
(8^(*
The tickets were to be from a friend of my wife's who was looking for
another couple to go with them, but seeing as we cain't shake the
rugrats for the night, both of us cain't go, and the operative word was
"couple".
Supposedly, these tickets for the corporate box will pop up during the
season, too, when all of the babysitters ain't on freakin' vacation.
So, tomorrow, me and Mrs. JaKe will just have to load up the troops and
spend the day at the Three Rivers Regatta, watching the F1 boats, and
the water ski shows, and (me, mainly) the scantily clad wimmens that
attend these things, and drinking ber after beer after beer, and having
grilled sausage sandwiches, and gyros, and, ah sh!t, I'm sorta dieting,
ain't I, ah, the hell with the diet for tomorrow, ?I'm going to enjoy
myself if it kills me, just no Steeler game.
Doubt I'll stay for the Fireworks and Laser show at 9:45, either, cause
the kids will be mondo whiney, and there'll be 250,000 other idiots
there, and traffic would take about 3 hours to get thru, ah shit, I may
just stay home tomorrow and strip the baseboard in the "This Old
Freakin' House" I live in.
Not attneding the Steeler game, and major bummed
JaKe
|
35.618 | Where's your sense of adventure? | SHALOT::MEDVID | there is really no-one left | Fri Aug 07 1992 17:58 | 7 |
| JaKe,
leave the wife at home and call an escort service. Perhaps Pepper is
free. You'll just have to wash the lipstick off a yo haid before you
go home.
--dan'l
|
35.619 | Ain't that a shame ... | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Aug 07 1992 19:00 | 14 |
| JaKe,
You should have called me. I got a brother in Pittsburgh. Could have
visited him for the weekend and baby sat on Sat. night. Of course I am
not sure that you would be willing to pay the price.
Price would have been that your p-name would have to read
Mets in '92
until after the baseball season.
The Crazy Met
|
35.620 | probibly better this way | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | | Sat Aug 08 1992 07:09 | 7 |
|
Jake,
No matter, you would have gotten depressed once you saw
how lowsey you team really is.
WOOF!
|
35.621 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Aug 10 1992 00:58 | 3 |
| The little Jakes must be like the Simpsons eh? Nobody wants ta watch
'em!
Denny 8^)
|
35.622 | High Scoring Game//No D or Good O | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Aug 10 1992 11:41 | 5 |
| Jake,
I know you're teeeeeeeed still but any post game reports.
Roy L.
|
35.623 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Aug 10 1992 16:47 | 20 |
| As usual, Brister looked like cow excrement, Strom only fair, and
O'Donnell, even though he was playing mopup in the 4th quarter, added
some excitement to the game by bringing them to the Iggles 25 or so
with 4 seconds left, but the Steelers lined up without a tackle,
slammed the ball into the ground to stop the clock, incurred the
illegal formation penalty, and the refs ran 10 seconds off of the
clock, therefore ending the game at 35-33, as there was only 2 seconds
left BEFORE the penalty.
I have to take a call about 110 miles from here in a little while, but
I'll get all the stats and some synopsis of the Steeler performance in
here if I get back here tonight, or if I get a chance tomorrow night.
Steelers .vs. The Saints nexted Monday, O'Donnell gets his turn at
starting QB.
Overall, the Steelers looked pretty lousy Saturday night.
JaKe
|
35.624 | TV???????? | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Fri Aug 14 1992 08:48 | 8 |
| Does anyone know if the Steeler - Saints game is supposed to be on
ABC Monday Night Football? I'd much rather see this one than the Bills-Lions.
I was pretty impressed with O'Donnell last year and would like to see him
given the nod over Brister. Has Lipps signed yet?
Bill
|
35.625 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Getting older by the minute | Fri Aug 14 1992 16:33 | 6 |
| As far as I know, Lipps is still holding out. ABC is showing the
Bills-Lions here in Pgh., so I doubt if they'll be showing the
Steeler-Saints debacle anywhere.
JaKe
|
35.626 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 14 1992 16:58 | 3 |
| Bills-Lions is on ESPN, not ABC.
Joe
|
35.627 | Q's | SHALOT::MEDVID | Seasick, yet still docked | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:18 | 11 |
| A. Why are the Steelers and Saints playing tonight if the game isn't
going to be on ABC or ESPN?
B. Is it being played in Pittsburgh or New Orleans?
C. What time does it start?
D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
ripe young age of 21), and not score?
|
35.628 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:29 | 11 |
| > D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
> shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
> ripe young age of 21), and not score?
Why ask why?
|
35.629 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:41 | 1 |
| Bad breath maybe?
|
35.630 | Maybe we shoulda had Tic-Tacs | SHALOT::MEDVID | Seasick, yet still docked | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:50 | 7 |
| > Bad breath maybe?
Nope. In fact my friend and I were making light of the fact that there
was "no way we'll would strike out tonight. We have gum."
Now, back to the Steelers Saints...
|
35.631 | good questions | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Mon Aug 17 1992 13:29 | 12 |
|
a. I'm stumped on this one.
b. New Orleans
c. 7:40pm
d. No clue
I guess .500 isn't too bad
Bill
|
35.632 | wrong positioning of the potato?? | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Aug 17 1992 14:52 | 20 |
|
re: dan'l
> D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
> shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
> ripe young age of 21), and not score?
Next time, stick the potato in the front of your pants...
bill..g.
p.s. just got back from the Steel City and if it's any consolation,
you'll probably be glad the Steeler's aren't on national t.v. cause
they are not a pretty sight. But I'm sure if you hop on down to your
local tavern with a dish, they could probably find the uplink to the
Steel City cause the Steelers will be on back there (I think).
|
35.633 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Getting older by the minute | Mon Aug 17 1992 16:38 | 11 |
|
>>D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
>>shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
>>ripe young age of 21), and not score?
Shot hit the post?????????
Re-.1 Rollward!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.634 | what a drubbing | PFSVAX::JACOB | Getting older by the minute | Tue Aug 18 1992 00:28 | 10 |
| Steelers get their clocks cleaned, 26-0 at the hands of the Saints.
In the QB duel, NOBODY looked good.
Jerry Olsavski(sp?), LB, suffered a broken bone in his hand.
Duvall Love suffered a bad sprain of the ankle.
JaKE
|
35.635 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush=Truly a Legend in his own mind | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:17 | 13 |
| STEELERS 28
Bears 17
Neil O'Donnell, IMHO, takes the lead in the QB race.
Woodson hurt, out 3 weeks(and the first game of the season is against
the Oilers, sh*t).
David Johnson hurt also, out 2-4 weeks.
Time to sign Thomas Everett.
JaKe
|
35.636 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Aug 24 1992 12:38 | 23 |
| I finally got to see the Steeler's play last night. It looks like they're
making some progress especially in the weakest spot, the offensive line.
I'm not sure that O'Donnell has won the QB race yet. He played well last
night but so did Brister. But Brister was going up against Chicago's
1st string defense. When O'Donnell played, the Bears were freely substituting
the younger players while the Steeler's basically used their first
string offense until the middle of the 4th quarter. Also, Harbaugh had
an incredible performance in the first half which limited the playing time
of Brister and the Steeler offense.
It looks like Joel Steed played well. He had half a sack and caused a fumble
by running down a QB 15 yards away from his area of responsibility. After
the fumble, the momentum really went the Steeler's way. Adrian Cooper looked
as good as Eric Green and finally Graham and Mills have made some
contributions. I really liked the reverse to Dwight Stone. With his speed,
I can't understand why the Steeler's haven't used him in the reverse more in
the past.
A win is a win, but I doubt that they would have won if Harbaugh had played
the whole game.
Keith
|
35.637 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | I will feel so glad to go | Mon Aug 24 1992 17:15 | 8 |
| > I really liked the reverse to Dwight Stone. With his speed,
> I can't understand why the Steeler's haven't used him in the reverse more in
> the past.
I can. Joe Walton.
--dan'l
|
35.638 | Who's Running | SALEM::HARRIS_K | | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:26 | 3 |
| Who looks to be the #1 ball carrier, Hoge or Foster????
Kenn
|
35.639 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:37 | 10 |
| Ya know, it's a crime. There are no WORTHY newspapers here in
Pittsburgh right now, and I don't watch hardly ANY television, hell, I
haven't even caught any of the radio sports shows recently, so all I
know about the Steelers right now is that they're 1-2 in preseason.
Maybe I'll go home and call my Dad tonite, cause he has all the info
handy.
JaKe
|
35.640 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:51 | 11 |
| Papers are still on strike? How long has it been?
Do people with subscriptions to out of town papers (NY Times, Wall
Street Journal) get there papers delivered??
Last newspaper strike in NY was man years ago (last 1970's) and it was
only for a few weeks and it was very frustrating for even a short
period of time. How do theatres advertise movies, stores advertise
sales, etc??
The Crazy Met
|
35.641 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Avoid TAP, keep back against wall | Thu Aug 27 1992 18:12 | 8 |
| re-1 Advertise on tv maybe? Let the theaters show times as new movies
are being pushed.
Who cares about grocery stores? They are the biggest ripoffs next
to gas stations! If you save .20 cents on one thing, you pay .30
cents extra for something else.
Tim
|
35.642 | MtM, Is this sports related??? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Fri Aug 28 1992 00:06 | 1 |
|
|
35.643 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Fri Aug 28 1992 09:19 | 19 |
| The Pgh Press is on strike, or lockout or whatever the hell you want to
call it. The little local papers, ie community by community type have
minute coverage, so to get good coverage of the Steelers, I guess I'll
have to get a subscription to "Steelers' Digest".
The paper has been out for over 3 months now. There are actually 2
papers here, the Pittsburgh Press and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Only the Press is actually on strike, but since the Post-Gazette uses
all of the Press' equipment under some kind of special agreement, they
cain't put out a paper, either.
Yes, TCM, out of town papers get delivered. A very good friend of mine
works 2 hours each night delivering 72 papers, and Sunday he delivers
90 papers, I think it's the New York Times or some other NY paper. HE
gets paid $150 a week for 14 hours work, so I cain only imagine what
the people getting the paper are PAYING for it.
JaKe
|
35.644 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Fri Aug 28 1992 09:24 | 18 |
| Neil O'Donnell will get the start in the Steelers pre-season finale.
Brister will play some or all of the second half.
With the paper strike here, 2 radios stations have attained the
services of Pgh. Press sportswriters Bob SMizik and Gene Collier.
Both, this morning, agree that Cowher should go with O'Donnell this
season, cause this team is going nowhere this year. They said if the
team had a chance at the playoffs, Brister would be the choice, but
since they are exssentially in a rebuild, go with O'donnell and groom
him for the future.
Lipps is still holding out, and IMHO, the Steelers should just release
him. He hasn't been the force he was in his first year or two and I
think the game is passing him by. He ain't worth big bucks as he
thinks he is.
JaKe
|
35.645 | more... | SHALOT::MEDVID | I will feel so glad to go | Fri Aug 28 1992 14:39 | 8 |
| Accoridng to Steelers Digest, Hoge will still be the primary ball
carrier.
Latest issue features Dwight Stone and his all-pro potential. After
reading it, I gotta believe with a new offensive scheme Stone might
become a star.
--dan'l
|
35.646 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Mon Aug 31 1992 08:47 | 11 |
| Steelers waltz over Giants Sat. Night, 24-3.
O'Donnell had a very impressive first half, while Brister's very first
pass of the game was, you guessed it, and interception.
O'Donnell appears to have won the starting job, so I'll try to catch
some radio news this week and as soon as I hear something, I'll get it
in here.
JaKe
|
35.647 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:10 | 5 |
| And I can tell by Handley's post-game comments that the man is much
more clueless than I ever imaginged....
'Saw
|
35.648 | ???????? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:18 | 7 |
| pray tell Chainsaw,
Wot did he say?
deen to wonk,
Kev
|
35.649 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:22 | 17 |
| > pray tell Chainsaw,
>
> Wot did he say?
>
> deen to wonk,
> Kev
Oh, a lot of doublespeak about continuity and sh*t like that.
They're plagued by the same thing as always.....no problem until they
hit the Red Zone.....
'Saw
|
35.650 | Neil O at the helm of the Steelers' O | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Mon Aug 31 1992 18:32 | 13 |
|
THE GREAT QB DEBATE IS OVER!!!!!
Neil O'Donnell will be the Steelers starting QB this year.
The Steelers made some moves today, including cutting OL Tom
tickets, a 1st round pick a couple of years ago, and QB Rick Strom,
perenially a last cut, then they'll pick him back up in a week or so.
JaKe
|
35.651 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Aug 31 1992 18:53 | 7 |
| Its only over for the 1st week. If O'donnel starts doing bad,
Boobsy will probably step in, but not up! The faiders have the same
delima, what QB do we want to lose with?
HTH
Tim
|
35.652 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Mon Aug 31 1992 19:54 | 16 |
| Tim,
I ain't so sure about that. Brister has had 6+ years to show
somehting, and he's shown a penchant for throwing interceptions,
throwing stupid passes, and dancing around behind the line.
I think Cowher will go with O'Donnell and give the guy a real chance,
not just a game or two. This is a team much in the need of a
direction, and flipping Brister in there at the first sign of trouble
would prove nothing. I say let Neil play, and take the consequences,
and let the guy learn during the year. That way, in a year or two or
three, Brister will be drinking beer and passing gas and watching the
games on the tube, whilst Neil O leads the Steelers to SB ring #5.
JaKe
|
35.653 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Mon Aug 31 1992 23:14 | 1 |
| The backfield looks like Hoge and Williams?
|
35.654 | | SALEM::DODA | RedSox Magic # 911 | Tue Sep 01 1992 10:05 | 1 |
| What about Foster?
|
35.655 | O'Donnell deserves it, by the way! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Sep 01 1992 11:26 | 14 |
| >> The faiders have the same delima, what QB do we want to lose with?
>> HTH
>> Tim
Tell me something Tim, how many times have the faids lost to the donks
with Schroeder leading the faids and Bucky leading the donks?
In the lasted five years or so (since Schroeder took over) it's gotta
be something like 8-2 or 7-3, in favor of Schroeder. Of course the
donks probably ain't much of a yardstick though huh? :-)
Carlitos
|
35.656 | I knew this would stir ya up;^) | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:26 | 14 |
| Come-on Carlos, Jay can take credit for one of those wins, Bo takes
credit for 1, and the rest should go to the faids defense. The win Jay
can take credit for is the monday nighter at mile hi that saw the faids
down 24-0 at half, but came back to win 30-27 or something like that.
Other than that, I can't recall anything that he has done.
You would be smiling big time if you had Elway instead of Shread.?!
Next week will be fun to watch as long as I'm in town!
Tim
|
35.657 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:49 | 3 |
|
I'd be smilin Bigtime if I had O'Donnell instead of Shred...
|
35.658 | defense can't do it alone! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Sep 01 1992 14:29 | 13 |
| Ok, I'll give you that the defense played a big part in those wins, but
still, the faids' offense (with shredder at the helm) had to put more
points on the board than the doinks in order to win, which he did.
Now either the doinks defense must have really sucked, if shredder's as
bad as you claim. Or else it's something else, and everybody knows that
the doinks defense has been pretty good recently (weren't they ranked
#1 in the AFC lasted year). So basically, schredder must be doing
something in order for the faids to be dominating the doinks like they
have been since he's been around. :-)
By the way Mark, I think I'd rather have Bucky than O'Donnell.
Carlitos
|
35.659 | Bucky would rather have the Raiders "O" Line too | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Sep 02 1992 17:46 | 6 |
| Hey... Move this Crap to the Broncos or Raiders conference. We don't
want to talk football in a topic that has nothing to do with it !!
~/~
BG
|
35.660 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Wed Sep 02 1992 20:46 | 27 |
| Huey Richardson. lasted years #1 draft pick, was dealt away to the
Redskins today for an undisclosed draft pick, rumored ot be a middle
rounder.
So, in 3 days this week, the Steelers have gotten rid of last years #1,
and 2 years ago's 2nd first round pick(Tom RIcketts). This only shows
the ineptitude of the former Steeler staff in the draft over the lasted
10 years. Rod Woodson and Eric Green are the onlyu 2 1st rounders that
have been worth a damn.
I think Cowher had little problem getting rid of these former 1st
rounders because they weren't his picks. Had they been his picks,
would he have been so quick to get rid of them???
Also, heard that in lasted weeks win over the Giants, Cowher was giving
verbal counselling to Richardson and Richardson started arguing with
Cowher, and was wagging his finger in Cowher's face and coming also
close to hitting him. With Cowher being a YOUNG head coach, some
players are going to test him to see what they cain get away with. I
don't know if getting rid of Richardson has anything to do with the
incident Sat. night, but it sort of sends a message to anybody who
might have ideas of going against Cowher.
JMHO
JaKe
|
35.661 | Good example where 1st rounders' salaries are out of hand | SHALOT::MEDVID | the same deep water as you | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:48 | 5 |
| Keith Olberman (or however you spell it) on ESPN, said Huey Richardson's
stats for the Steelers last year were 2 tackles...he got paid $750,000
a piece for them.
--dan'l
|
35.662 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:16 | 9 |
| >>Keith Olberman (or however you spell it) on ESPN, said Huey Richardson's
>>stats for the Steelers last year were 2 tackles...he got paid $750,000
>>a piece for them.
Hail, for that kinda $$$, I'll go make a tackle or two. For that
matter, they cain pay me $100k per tackle, and I won't bitch about it.
JaKe
|
35.663 | Has he signed yet? | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:24 | 3 |
| What's the latest on Lipps (of the Louis variety)?
Bill
|
35.664 | Lipps jokes starting again.... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:42 | 1 |
| Lipps has kissed his contract goodby...
|
35.665 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:43 | 4 |
| I seriously doubt if Lipps will ever stand in another Steeler huddle.
JaKe
|
35.666 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:51 | 7 |
| The poop on Lipps is that he's asking for ~$1 million/year.
The guy's on the seriously downside of his career and will never get
that kind of money, plus he's forever injured.
JaKe
|
35.667 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:52 | 4 |
| Louis Lipps sink ships....
'Saw
|
35.668 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:21 | 5 |
| Lipps sticks it to Steelers, Pouts away from team, Agent all puckered out.
Teammates say Lipps is all wet....
JD
|
35.669 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:47 | 2 |
| Lipps' contract would take a bite out of the Steelers payroll. Although I've
heard that he ia a fine chap, it seems to me that he is a sucker.
|
35.670 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:54 | 3 |
| The Steelers management is in the process of putting together a
contract similar to the one that the Bears put together for the Fridge,
it seems that they're afraid of having a fat Lipps.
|
35.671 | Steelers will please if you aren't expecting too much | SHALOT::MEDVID | the same deep water as you | Fri Sep 04 1992 12:33 | 25 |
| After reading the last pre-season issue of Steelers Digest, there is
some optimism. But hell, when your new punter is the brightest spot of
the pre-season, you just gotta wonder.
I think O'Donnell will be OK, but he really doesn't have any quality
recievers that aren't tight ends. Dwight Stone is great once he
catches the ball, so I figure he'll be the primary target to be double
teamed.
Running game should be strong but not dominant.
Offensive line should be better...how could they get worse?
Defensive line and linebackers are essentially the same as last year
which means Kosar and Moon will have ages to throw the ball. Still
tough against the run though.
Defensive secondary is suspect after being the best in the league two
years ago.
This spells nothing more than a .500 season for the Steelers. Anything
better than 8-8 will be gravy. But the sad thing is, with the current
state of the AFC, 9-7 could put a team in the playoffs.
--dan'l
|
35.672 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Fri Sep 04 1992 19:40 | 5 |
| Only thing --dan'l, I don't think they'll reach 8-8 this year, I see
6-10, or 7-9 as a probability, personally.
JaKe
|
35.673 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Sep 04 1992 19:52 | 6 |
|
Iffin they can survive the first 8 weeks of their schedule, they
might end up 9-7. But that first half is a real killer with most of
the games away.
|
35.674 | Gotta gloat while we can | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Tue Sep 08 1992 00:05 | 56 |
|
When the book is closed on the 1992 NFL season, this win in
game one by the Steelers over the Oilers may be meaningless. Right now,
though, it looks big, very big. Gone are the days of the Emperor Chas.
Noll, his weak general Joe Walton, and all of the other staff that made
the Steelers as predictable and horrendous as anyone could want.
Here, now, is the beginning of the reign of Emperor wannabe, Bill
Cowher, and his offensive general Ron Erhardt.
Mind you, that most of us here in Pittsburgh remember that one
young coach with the last name of Noll took over a then horrendous Steeler
team, and in his first regular season game, took that same team to win num-
ber one. The team then proceeded to lose their next 13 games(in a 14 game
season), prompting many to believe that Noll was headed for the same
unemployment line that the previous Steeler head coaches used. Little
were we to know at that time the heights Noll would take that team to.
I seriously doubt that this Steeler team will lose 15 games this
season, but I also seriously doubt that this team will be playing in any
playoff games this year, either.
The game was exciting, with O'Donnell giving the Oilers some TD's,
Brister-style on fumbles. Barry Foster running like his life depended on it,
and the inclusion of a FAKE PUNT, something that the emperor of late hardly
ever used.
But the best performance, for the Steelers, of the day was that of
Oiler QB Warren Moon, who, at times, threw the most ill-advised, poorly
poorly thrown balls, he's thrown since joining the NFL. One of which came
either late in the third qtr, or early in the 4th qtr(effects of beer on the
memory), when the Oilers were driving for a TD which would have put firmly
them in the lead, and good coverage by the Steeler secondary forced Moon to
move outside of the poocket. His pass protection then broke down, and Moon,
under pressure, let lose a truly lame duck that Rod Woodson picked out of
the air and returned 50+ yards. Shortly thereafter, Neil O'Donnell threw a
TD pass that put the Steelers up by a score of 29-24, and that's the way it
ended.
Stat of the day, under QB stats:
Warren Moon, Interceptions=5
Cowher took the ceremonial dousing with Gatorade near the end of the
and appeared very happy, getting his first NFL win.
Long Live The New Emperor.
BTW, I realize that in a few weeks, I may be crying, "Run the Bum out of Town"
but I realize that this season, in all likelyhood won't be a playoff year
for the Steelers and I have to enjoy these bright spots as they come.
I'll try and find a paper with the Stats from the game, but in the meantime,
if anybody has the stats, either team, individual, or both, would they please
enter them in here???
Thanks
JaKe
|
35.675 | 5 INTs... that's the Moon we like ;-) | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Tue Sep 08 1992 09:28 | 5 |
|
Where's Midnight when we need him!
/Jeff
|
35.676 | A meaningful win made all the more meaningful | SHALOT::MEDVID | the same deep water as you | Tue Sep 08 1992 13:28 | 19 |
| It wasn't Moon's bad day.
It wasn't Barry Foster's running.
It wasn't Adrian Cooper's game-winning catch.
It wasn't Jeff Grahm's consistent play.
It wasn't Bill Cowher's new and exciting brand of football.
It wasn't the Steelers' opportunistic secondary.
It wasn't the good performance by Neil O'Donnell.
No, folks, the highlight of Sunday for me was the phone ringing at 4:03
and hearing my father's exuberant voice on the other end. I haven't
heard him this happy on a Sunday afternoon since January 1980.
JaKe's right, Pittsburgh probably won't be in the playoffs, but this
win was enough to make that man that I respect so dearly enjoy his
Sunday afternoon for a change. He bleeds black and gold and gave me
that same blood. It truly makes the season, no matter what happens the
other 15 games.
--dan'l
|
35.677 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Tue Sep 08 1992 16:28 | 37 |
| I agree with ya --dan'l, but for those that don't know what these
statements equate to, here goes
>>It wasn't Moon's bad day.
Good stats for Moon, 'cept for the interception one, he was something
like 28-45 for 330 yards, but those 5 INT's killed him/the oilers.
>>It wasn't Barry Foster's running.
About 24 carries for 109 yards(stats may be off slightly)
>>It wasn't Adrian Cooper's game-winning catch.
A nice one at that, IN TRAFFIC!!
>>It wasn't Jeff Grahm's consistent play.
7 catches for 89 yards
>>It wasn't Bill Cowher's new and exciting brand of football.
Exciting, I do agree. Fake punts, decent blocking, not just the same
old Steeler plays.
>>It wasn't the Steelers' opportunistic secondary.
5 ints, what else can be said.
>>It wasn't the good performance by Neil O'Donnell.
Brister has his unemployment papaer filled out already. Not a great
performance, but a good one.
Bill Cowher, in his weekly press conference(which I only caught an
excerpt from) praised his team, but said they will have a tough game
Sunday against the Jests. He called for lots of noise from the fans
this coming Sunday, and he said that, since the game is at 4pm, the
fans will have 3 extra hours to "prepare" to be extra noisy.
Stats will be in here later tonite if time permits.
JaKe
|
35.678 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Sep 08 1992 17:15 | 27 |
|
To say that I was in shock on Sunday is a understatement. For a
young team, this first win away and against a superbowl possible is
a fantastic motivator. No one gave the Steelers much of a chance, but
AGAIN they went to the 'Dome and pulled the great game out of their
hats.
A couple of years ago, it was a wildcard win in Houston that sent
them to Denver where they played their hearts out and the nation got
to see Bubby's mom every 10 seconds. Years ago during the dynasty, it
was Bum and the 'ropes' and how the Oilers would destroy them. Seems
that the Steelers conked them something like 31-3.
I saw the fake punt on the highlights and it was beautiful.
Brought back bad memories of that fake punt in '72? against the
Dolphins in the playoffs that preserved their perfect season. Now, the
shoes on the other foot! Glad to see some changes in the offense.
But, seeing all those fumbles again remined me of the Steelers of the
last 8 years. But where there is light, there is hope.
Let's hope they can make it two in a row!
pour on the Iron...
|
35.679 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Tue Sep 08 1992 17:20 | 18 |
|
>> Years ago during the dynasty, it
>>was Bum and the 'ropes' and how the Oilers would destroy them. Seems
>>that the Steelers conked them something like 31-3.
If you're talking AFC Championship game there, the final was 34-5 in an
icebowl style game. I had 20 yard line seats and stayed for the whole
game and finished off a fifth of Jos� Cuervo all by my lonesome that
day. For some odd reason, I cain't drink tequila straight anymore.
As I stated before, though, remember, Chas. Noll won game 1 of his
career, and proceeded to lose 13 straight.
Hopefully, history doesn't repeat itself.
JaKe
|
35.680 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Tue Sep 08 1992 21:53 | 10 |
| Eric Green finally underwent an MRI today. He was supposed to undergo
one yesterday, but the scanner at the hospital he went to wasn't big
enough to fit him in.
Diagnosis is that Green has a bruised rotator cuff in his right
shoulder, and is expected to be out about 3 weeks.
JaKe
|
35.681 | STEELERS 1-0 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Tue Sep 08 1992 22:10 | 58 |
|
STEELERS 29
Oilers 24
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 7 9 6 7 29
Oilers 14 10 0 0 24
Scoring Summary:
1st Quarter
Houston--Meads 15 yd fumble return (Del Greco PAT)
Houston--Givens 11 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
2nd Quarter
STEELERS--FG Anderson 30 yd
Houston-- FG Del Greco 36 yd
Steelers--Graham 20 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT blocked)
Houston--Givens 8 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
3rd Quarter
STEELERS--FG Anderson 25 yd
STEELERS--FG Anderson 37 yd
4th Quarter
Steelers--Cooper 9 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Team Stats:
STEELERS HOUSTON
20 First Downs 23
34-136 Rushes/yds 14-104
245 Passing Yds 330
15-24-0 Comp-Att-Int 29-45-5
3-22 Sacked/yds lost 0-0
2-51 Punts 2-48
2-2 Fumbles-lost 0-0
7-69 Penalties-yards 7-61
32:41 Time of Possession 27:19
Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS: Foster 26-107, STone 2-26, Hoge 3-8, O'Donnell 3-(-5).
Houston: White 13-100, Givens 1-4
Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 14-23-0, 223 yards, Royals 1-1-0, 44 yards.
Houston: Moon 29-45-5, 330 yds.
Receiving:
STEELERS: Graham 7-89 yds, Stone 2-80 yds, Foster 2-26 yds, Hoge 2-19 yds,
W. Williams 1-44 yds, Cooper 1-9 yds.
Houston: Duncan 8-98 yds, Jeffires 7-117 yds, L.Harris 7-49 yds, Givens 4-42
yds, White 3-24 yds.
JaKe
|
35.682 | one down , fifteen more to go | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 09 1992 08:46 | 24 |
| First off, thanks a bunch for the stats, JaKe.
A few things that I am concerned about though,
>> STEELERS HOUSTON
>> 3-22 Sacked/yds lost 0-0
These are the two biggest weaknesses from last year, poor pass protection
and poor pass rush. I had hoped they would have made some improvements.
>>Steelers--Graham 20 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT blocked)
^^^^^^^^^^^
How long has it been since this has happened? IMHO Anderson has been the most
consistant kicker I've seen in black and gold. I can only hope that this was a
blown blocking assignment at the line and not a sign of things to follow.
Did Green get hurt in the game or has this been something that happened
earlier this spring? I don't remember hearing anything about it up here
in Cow Hampshire.
This sure was a sweet one, regardless of how it was played. Especially
coming out of the "House with no brains". ;^)
Bill
|
35.683 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | the same deep water as you | Wed Sep 09 1992 10:34 | 32 |
| >These are the two biggest weaknesses from last year, poor pass protection
>and poor pass rush. I had hoped they would have made some improvements.
There was no pass rush at all for the Steelers unless they blitzed from
the secondary. Linebackers need fresh blood.
The pass protection wasn't too bad and O'Donnell made the best of the
time he had. Lots of penalties on the O-line. Especially Duvall Love
who Pittsburgh got from the Rams. But love was up against Ray Childres
and that's usually a problem for any mediocre lineman. Camera did
catch a shot of Cowher bitching at Love after a holding call.
Cowher also was shown chewing out a rookie LB after a kickoff. The kid
was getting into a shouting/shoving match and Cowher got on his butt.
These guys are going to behave or else.
>How long has it been since this has happened? IMHO Anderson has been the most
>consistant kicker I've seen in black and gold. I can only hope that this was a
>blown blocking assignment at the line and not a sign of things to follow.
Again, I think this was Love vs Childres and you know who won.
>Did Green get hurt in the game or has this been something that happened
>earlier this spring?
Green got hurt the first play of the game. Never showed what happened.
The frightening thing (for opponents) is that Adrian Cooper is just as
big and just as good. Cooper filled Keith Jackson's place at OU when
Jackson graduated. Good stock.
--dan'l
|
35.684 | | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 09 1992 13:02 | 16 |
|
>> Cowher also was shown chewing out a rookie LB after a kickoff. The kid
>> was getting into a shouting/shoving match and Cowher got on his butt.
>> These guys are going to behave or else.
This reminds me of another first year head coach that I saw on the
sidelines at Pitt Stadium in 1969 (or was it 1968). Considering
the latter's accomplishments, I'd say Cowher is on the right track.
Time will tell.
By the way, is Joe Green still involved with coaching staff? Last I
heard he was working with the defensive line, but that was admittedly
a few years ago.
Bill
|
35.685 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 09 1992 13:34 | 4 |
| When Noll retired after last season most of the coaching staff left.
Joe Greene is now the Defensive Line coach for the Dolphins.
John
|
35.686 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Sep 09 1992 13:34 | 27 |
|
re: Joe Greene
Joe has moved on to help with the Dolphins.
re: Jake
Nope, the game with the Oilers was in the dome and was during the
'70's. If I'm not mistaken, it was a Monday night game too. This was
before the Houston Oiler fightsong came out and all that Luv ya blue
junk. Anyway, the 'dome decided to give out all these little ropes in
hoping that the Oilers could rope, err hog tie the Steelers.
Away from home, the Oilers stunk. And yep, those were some great
games at 3 Rivers involving the Oilers. Two great teams fighting it
out. Never forget the way Joe and Co. completely shut down Earl too.
And if memory serves me correctly, it was during those games that
wearing the 'glove' became fashionable in the NFL. Up to that time,
it was stick'em galore but no gloves. Then Swann decided to wear a
skindivers glove since the temp was so cold and rainy. Seems that the
gloves gave not only warmth and dry hands, but the rubber outers helped
them hold onto the ball a little better... and as you say, the rest is
history.
bill..g.
|
35.687 | re: Joe Green | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 09 1992 13:47 | 7 |
|
Joe Green coaching with the phins????
I guess he doesn't mind waiting a REAL long time for that fifth ring.;^)
Bill
|
35.688 | Green out 3 games | LJOHUB::MFFL::Straub | Kramer for President | Wed Sep 09 1992 15:19 | 6 |
| Re. Eric Green
The SPORTS_91 notesfile says that he underwent an MRI on his shoulder
which hurt in the game and is expected to miss 3 games.
Dave
|
35.689 | ah's confused | CTHQ1::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Sep 09 1992 15:21 | 7 |
| -1,
Wait a sec, this IS the SPORTS notesfile, n'est-ce-pas?
I didn't miss a synapse again, did I?
8^),
MikeL
|
35.690 | Same conference.. different reply | LJOHUB::MFFL::Straub | Kramer for President | Wed Sep 09 1992 15:27 | 27 |
| Re. -1, and -2
Oops... you're right. This is SPORTS_91... the note is #.680... Long
day, sorry. - Dave
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
============================================================================
===
Note: 35.680 PITTSBURGH STEELERS 680 of
682
PFSVAX::JACOB "Carp Per Diem" 10 lines 8-SEP-1992
20:53
-< >-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Eric Green finally underwent an MRI today. He was supposed to undergo
one yesterday, but the scanner at the hospital he went to wasn't big
enough to fit him in.
Diagnosis is that Green has a bruised rotator cuff in his right
shoulder, and is expected to be out about 3 weeks.
JaKe
|
35.691 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Getting older by the minute | Wed Sep 09 1992 16:54 | 7 |
| Green did injure the shoulder on the first play of the game, but it is
being reported that the initial injury actually happened a couple of
weeks ago but Green never rested with the injury. Cowher has said the
Green will rest for the nexted 2-3 weeks while the injury heals.
JaKe
|
35.692 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Wed Sep 09 1992 21:54 | 2 |
| Did Meads score on an O'Donnell fumble?
|
35.693 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Wed Sep 09 1992 23:10 | 5 |
| Yeah, O'Donnell was hit and fumbled and he picked it up and waltzed
into the end zone for the TD.
JaKe
|
35.694 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Mon Sep 14 1992 09:17 | 19 |
| Barry Foster runs wild, the Steelers again play opportunistic defense,
and they win, 27-10 over the now lowly Jests. The Steelers are now
2-0.
Foster carried the ball 33 times for 190 yards, and now has 297 yards
on the season.
I only got to listen to bits and pieces of the game, cause WCBS out of
NY kept fading in and out on the car radio on the drive up here, but
the Steeler defense carried the team, IMHO, while the offense tried to
give it away at times thru turnovers. FOster, while running up the
yardage, also fumbled the ball three times.
This team has suprized me in the firsted two games.
GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JaKe
|
35.695 | Proud to be a Steelers fan once again | SHALOT::MEDVID | the same deep water as you | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:55 | 34 |
| The Steelers didn't look like world beaters yesterday, but they played
good ball. Pittsburgh will be roughed up by the better NFL teams.
Bright spot was Barry Foster, he who would only gain about 20-30 yards
per game in the Joe Walton offense. Foster averaged over 6 yards per
carry, that stat helped by a beautiful 54 yard TD run. Steelers are
2-0 and Foster has 100+ yards in both games...see any correlation?
O'Donnell made some really pretty passes, especially in crucial third
down situations. And a beautiful hail Mary that gave the Steelers a
boost before halftime. Noll would have run out the clock. Instead,
Steelers went into the locker room tied rather than 3 points down.
Jeff Grahm is finally coming around and was on the receiving end of a
few of those nicer O'Donnell passes.
The only points NY scored were due to Steelers mistakes, a fumble in
their own end and a fluke interception for a TD.
Steelers secondary was in high gear, especially David...excuse me...
D.J. Johnson (changed the name in the off season).
Still no pass rush. Tunch Ilkin went down so that could hurt the
already weak O-line...although O'Donnell and Foster didn't seem to be
having too much trouble.
But the best thing about this team is their discipline. There are no
more Keith Gary/Keith Willis type unsportsmanlike conduct calls. No
more jumping offside in 3rd and short. Very few false starts. The
team appears to be well coached.
I like Bill Cowher and I like this team.
--dan'l
|
35.696 | Steelers 2-0 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Mon Sep 14 1992 13:29 | 44 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
Jets 3 7 0 0 10
STEELERS 0 10 0 17 27
Scoring Summary
NY-- Fg Staurovsky 32 yd
STEELERS--Foster 23 yd run(Anderson PAT)
NY--Brim 77 yd interception return(Staurovsky PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 54 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 35 yd FG
STEELERS--Griffin 65 yd interception return(Anderson PAT)
Att--56050
TEAM STATS:
Jets STEELERS
12 1st downs 17
22-110 Rushes-Yds 45-215
129 Passing Yds 155
10-33-4 Comp-Att-Int 11-22-2
1-5 Sacked-yds lost 5-30
5-38 Punts 5-36
3-3 Fumbles-lost 3-3
7-52 Penalties-yds 3-20
22:42 Time of Poss. 37:18
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Jets--Thomas 10-49, Baxter 6-43, McNeil 4-28, Nagle 2-(-10)
STEELERS--Foster 33-190, Hoge 8-29, Thompson 1-1, O'Donnell 3-(-5)
PASSING
Jets--Nagle 9-29-1 117 yds, O'Brien 1-4-3 17 yds
STEELERS--O'Donnell 11-22-2 185 yds
RECEIVING:
Jets--Moore 3-50, C.Burkett 3-32, Toon 2-31, McNeil 2-21.
STEELERS--Graham 6-146, Hoge 2-13, Cooper 1-14, Mills 1-12, Foster 1-0
JaKe
|
35.697 | Steelers 2-0, Chargers nexted week | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Mon Sep 14 1992 13:59 | 46 |
| Here's the UNOFFICIAL cumulative Stats for the Steelers so far.
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 7 19 6 24 56
Opponent 17 17 0 0 34
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 5 5 20
Foster 3 0 0 18
Graham 1 0 0 6
Cooper 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards
Foster 59 297
Hoge 11 37
Stone 2 26
THompson 1 1
O'Donnell 6 (-10)
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Yds TD
O'Donnell 45 25 2 408 2
Royals 1 1 0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds
Graham 13 235
Hoge 4 32
Foster 3 26
Stone 2 80
Cooper 2 23
W. Williams 1 44
Mills 1 12
JaKe
|
35.698 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Anybody got some aspirin???? | Mon Sep 21 1992 09:10 | 13 |
| Neil O'Donnell threw for 2 TD's and ran for another as the Steelers
beat the Chargers, 23-6.
The Steelers are 3-0 for the firsted time since 1979, and we all know
how far they went that year.
Still waiting for the Steelers to be tested to find out what they're
really made of, though.
Cowher is the first Steeler rookie head coach to go 3-0.
JaKe
|
35.699 | Steelers 3-0 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Anybody got some aspirin???? | Mon Sep 21 1992 09:21 | 44 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 7 0 16 23
Chargers 3 3 0 0 6
SCORING SUMMARY
Chargers--Carney 24 yd FG
STEELERS--Cooper 24 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Chargers--Carney 43 yd FG
STEELERS--Stone 6 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT failed)
STEELERS--O'Donnell 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 42 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Chargers
16 1st downs 16
33-67 Rushes-yds 24-109
205 Passing yds 221
17-24-1 Comp-Att-int 16-36-3
1-10 Sacked-yds lost 1-8
6-37 Punts 6-45
2-2 Fumbles-lost 0-0
9-57 Penalties-yds 10-95
32:56 Time of Possession 27:04
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 21-36, Hoge 8-34, O'Donnell 4-(-3)
Chargers--Bernstine 11-65, Butts 9-23, Harmon 3-17, Humphries 1-4
PASSING--
STEELERS--17-24-1 215 yds
Chargers--Humphries 13-29-2 151 yds, Gagliano 3-7-1 78 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Stone 5-69, Graham 3-67, Cooper 3-36, Hoge 2-23, Mills 1-14, Thompson
1-7, Foster 1-(-1).
Chargers--Jefferson 4-45, Harmon 3-77, Lewis 3-36, Walker 3-15, Miller 2-49,
Bernstine 1-7
JaKe
|
35.700 | Green update! | JURAN::WEST | | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:25 | 8 |
|
Does anyone know when the Steelers are expecting the return of Eric
Green? At first he was out 2-3 weeks now I hear 6 weeks (3 more weeks)
can someone give me an update, my Fantasy football team could use him
with the bye weeks coming up....thanks
kevin
|
35.701 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Sep 21 1992 12:23 | 4 |
| The most impressive stat for the Steeler's so far this year is that
0 points have been scored against them in the 2nd half.
Keith
|
35.702 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Anybody got some aspirin???? | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:09 | 4 |
| The Steelers lead the league(so far) with 12 interceptions in 3 games.
JaKe
|
35.703 | thrown to or caught from? <he he he ;*)> | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:35 | 1 |
|
|
35.704 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | U S 1992 Rodeo Sex Champion | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:43 | 4 |
| Ok, Kev, The Steelers have INTERCEPTED 12 passes.
JaKe
|
35.705 | STEELERS UNOFFICIAL Offensive stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | U S 1992 Rodeo Sex Champion | Mon Sep 21 1992 15:23 | 47 |
|
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 7 26 6 40 79
Opponent 20 20 0 0 40
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 6 7 25
Foster 3 0 0 18
Cooper 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Stone 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 80 333 4.16
Hoge 19 71 3.73
Stone 2 26 13.00
THompson 1 1 1.00
O'Donnell 10 (-13) (-1.30)
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Yds TD
O'Donnell 69 42 3 623 4
Royals 1 1 0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 16 302 18.9
Stone 7 149 21.3
Hoge 6 55 9.2
Cooper 5 59 11.8
Foster 4 25 6.3
Mills 2 26 13.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Thompson 1 7 7.0
JaKe
|
35.706 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Fifty-Seven brain cells & nuthin on | Wed Sep 23 1992 11:33 | 12 |
| re somewhere in this conference, where it was stated that the Steelers
have been underdogs all 3 games and won all three:
This week, they're favored by 3.5 over the Meat Packers from Wisconson.
Now, dammit, why do they have to go and favor the Steelers???
Now they'll probably lose, cause they're supposed to win. I say just
make them the underdogs EVERY game, and don't jinx them.
JaKe
|
35.707 | "favored" Steelers drop one to Green Bay | MKFSA::LONG | so many braincells so little time | Mon Sep 28 1992 09:14 | 16 |
| >> re somewhere in this conference, where it was stated that the Steelers
>> have been underdogs all 3 games and won all three:
>> This week, they're favored by 3.5 over the Meat Packers from Wisconson.
>> Now, dammit, why do they have to go and favor the Steelers???
>> Now they'll probably lose, cause they're supposed to win. I say just
>> make them the underdogs EVERY game, and don't jinx them.
>> JaKe
Nice going, Karnak!
Bill
|
35.708 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | A Rodeo-Sex Weekend was Great!! | Mon Sep 28 1992 17:34 | 19 |
|
>> Nice going, Karnak!
>> Bill
Just had that feeling, whaddid I tell ya in the terminal room lasted
week.
Rod Woodson left his brain in Pittsburgh, had one HORRIBLE game, burnt
TWICE for TD passes, and dove for a muffed punt and lost it, then on
the nexted play he got burnt for one of his 2 TD's he gave up.
The defense wasn't TOO bad, but the offense reminded me terribly of
lasted years.
Stats later 2nite or tomorrow night depending on workload.
JaKe
|
35.709 | STEELERS are now 3-1 | PFSVAX::JACOB | And Nirvana can fly outta my butt | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:33 | 45 |
|
SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 3 0 0 0 3
Green Bay 0 10 0 7 17
STEELERS--Anderson 35 yd FG
Packers--Jacke 47 yd FG
Packers--Sharpe, 76 yd pass from Favre(Jacke PAT)
Packers--Brooks, 8 yd pass from Favre(Jacke PAT)
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Green Bay
16 First Downs 16
18-145 Rushes-Yds 38-99
208 Passing Yds 195
16-41-0 Comp-Att-Int 14-19-0
2-16 Sacked-Yds Lost 2-15
5-40 Punts 5-39
2-1 Fumbles-Lost 2-0
4-35 Penalties-Yds 6-41
22:25 Time of Possession 37:35
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
Rushing:
STEELERS: Foster 12-117, Hoge 3-18, Stone 1-5, O'Donnell 1-5, Thompson 1-0.
Green Bay: Workman 26-85, Favre 4-12, E.Bennett 2-5, McGee 4-4, Sydney 1-3,
Sharpe 1-(-10).
Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 16-41-0 224 yds
Green Bay: Favre 14-19-0, 210 yds
Receiving:
STEELER: Stone 5-101, Graham 3-32, Hoge 3-29, Mills 2-24, Cooper 1-17,
Davenport 1-13, Jorden 1-8.
Green Bay: Workman 4-20, McGee 3-28, Sharpe 2-93, Harris 2-23, Taylor 1-28
Sydney 1-10, Brooks 1-8.
JaKe
|
35.710 | STEELERS UNOFFICIAL cumulative stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | Where the Hell am I?? | Tue Sep 29 1992 13:04 | 49 |
|
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 10 26 6 40 82
Opponent 20 30 0 7 57
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 7 7 28
Foster 3 0 0 18
Cooper 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Stone 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 92 450 4.89
Hoge 22 89 4.05
Stone 3 31 10.33
THompson 2 1 0.50
O'Donnell 11 (-8) (-0.73)
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Yds TD
O'Donnell 110 58 3 847 4
Royals 1 1 0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 19 334 17.6
Stone 12 250 20.8
Hoge 9 84 9.3
Cooper 6 76 12.7
Foster 4 25 6.3
Mills 4 50 12.5
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Davenport 1 13 13.0
Jorden 1 8 8.0
Thompson 1 7 7.0
JaKe
|
35.711 | | MKFSA::LONG | Bucs = NL East Champs x 3 | Tue Sep 29 1992 14:09 | 5 |
| I think that makes four 100+ yard games for Foster. Watching the game
two weeks ago I was really impressed with this guy's accelleration
into, and through, the line.
Bill
|
35.712 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Where the Hell am I?? | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:17 | 5 |
| Actually, Bill, Foster has 3 100+ yd games, and one where he only
gained about 29 yards.
JaKe
|
35.713 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Where the Hell am I?? | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:41 | 8 |
| OK, Bill, in the San Diego game, Foster was held to 36 yards on 21
carries.
Sunday, most of his yardage came on the 74 yard run. Other than that,
he was something like 11 carries, 43 yards, or thereabouts.
JaKe
|
35.714 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Where the Hell am I?? | Tue Oct 06 1992 21:21 | 12 |
| Damn, Damn, Damn
The Steelers are FAVORED again against the freakin' Brown(spot)s(tm).
Now since Cowher took over, they've won the 3 games they were underdogs
in, and lost the only game they were favored in. Wish they were
underdogs, cause making them favorites sorta jinxes them.
A buncha crappola
JaKe
|
35.715 | | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | | Wed Oct 07 1992 09:44 | 12 |
|
Don't worry Mr. Fake,
The Squeelers will be under the Dawg on Monday because
the Dawgs are gona kick some butt. Look for the Squeelers to
turn the ball over at least 4 times in the game.
Mack is Back!
WOOF!
|
35.716 | Conspiracy by the bookies | SALES::THILL | | Wed Oct 07 1992 13:49 | 5 |
| Yabbut, favorite/underdog ratings have notheing to do with the relative
strenght of the teams. It only is there to try to make sure +/- the
same amount of money is bet on both teams.
Tom
|
35.717 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Fri Oct 09 1992 16:32 | 11 |
| Mack is back.................and wearing lots of extra equipment!!!!!!
:^)
Hal Tried Hallucinogens (TM),
Nelly
|
35.718 | Steelers now 3-2 | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Mon Oct 12 1992 01:43 | 27 |
| What an exercise in mediocrity the Steelers and the Brown(spot)s(tm)
put on in the Mistake by the Lake today.
Gary Anderson hits the top of the upright on one of his field goal
attempts, and turnovers and the inability to punch the ball in and stupid
turnovers sealed the coffin on the Steelers second loss in a row, and their
tenth loss in Clevescum Stadium in their lasted 11 games there.
Early in the game, the crap they tried to pass off as turf started
to gurgle, buble and surge, leaving ruts in the field up to 6 inches deep.
Neil O'Donnell played a decent game, Barry Foster showed signs of bright-
ness, and signs of frustration. The Steelers got caught in a confused
state and Tomczak caught them and burned them for a long TD pass. Eric
Metcalf hurt them, as he has hurt other temas this year, with his running.
One stat that showed how the Brown(spot)s(tm) defense was bottling
the Steelers receivers was a stat they showed midway thru the 2nd Qtr,
that stat was that Foster, receiving, had 5 catches for 40 yards, a lot of
throws to a back that early in the game, eh??
The defense again appeared porous when they needed to suck it up and
keep the 'Spots offense out of the end zone.
The Steelers offense has not scored a touchdown in over 8 quarters.
JaKe
|
35.719 | Browns win BIG GAME! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Mon Oct 12 1992 11:36 | 9 |
|
To put it simple Mr. Fake,
The Squeelers rust up in the 2nd half as the "Thriller"
does the moon walk and Mack goes on the attack!
WOOF!
|
35.720 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Mon Oct 12 1992 13:21 | 4 |
|
At least Jake was man enough to show up!
FOOW!
|
35.721 | Steelers 3-2 & in need of a lot of work | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Mon Oct 12 1992 23:06 | 47 |
| SCORING SUMMARY:
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 3 3 0 3 9
Brown(spot)s(tm)0 3 7 7 17
STEELERS--FG Anderson 25 yds
STEELERS--FG Anderson 36 yds
'Spots--FG Stover 51 yds
'Spots--Mack 1 yd run(Stover PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 40 yds
'Spots--Jackson 47 yd pass from Tomczak(Stover PAT)
Team Stats:
STEELERS 'Spots
20 first downs 12
30-122 rushes-yds 27-85
228 passing yds 168
25-32-0 Compl-Att-Int 10-17-0
2-13 Sacked-yds lost 1-3
3-41 Punts 4-42
6-54 Penalties 8-67
2-1 Fumbles-lost 1-1
34:47 Time of Possession 25:13
Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS:Foster 24-84, Stone 1-17, Hoge 3-12, O'Donnell 2-9
'Spots: Metcalf 7-49, Mack 12-32, Vardell 3-7, Tomczak 5-(-3)
Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 25-32-0, 241 yards
'Spots: Tomczak 10-17-0-1TD, 171 yards
Receiving:
STEELERS: Graham 8-87, Foster 6-49, Green 3-36, Stone 3-31, Mills 2-21, Hoge
2-9, Cooper 1-8.
'Spots: Metcalf 3-48, Jackson 2-62, Smith 2-21, Bavaro 1-23, Mack 1-9,
McCardell 1-8.
Nexted week, The Bungholes on Monday MINUS Boomer Esiason.
JaKe
|
35.722 | STEELERS Unofficial stats thru 5 games(3-2) | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Mon Oct 12 1992 23:19 | 50 |
|
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 13 29 6 43 91
Opponent 20 33 7 14 74
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 10 7 37
Foster 3 0 0 18
Cooper 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Stone 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 116 534 4.60
Hoge 25 101 4.04
Stone 4 48 12.00
THompson 2 1 0.50
O'Donnell 13 1 0.77
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Yds TD
O'Donnell 142 83 3 1088 4
Royals 1 1 0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 27 421 15.6
Stone 15 281 18.7
Hoge 11 113 10.3
Foster 10 74 7.4
Cooper 7 84 12.0
Mills 6 71 11.8
E.Green 3 36 12.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Davenport 1 13 13.0
Jorden 1 8 8.0
Thompson 1 7 7.0
JaKe
|
35.723 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 01:08 | 9 |
| Steelers beat the Bungholes, 20-0.
Foster ran for ~ 108 yds, O'Donnell 22-36, no ints, don't know the
yardage.
Stats in here tomorrow given the chance.
JaKe
|
35.724 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 01:12 | 4 |
| Anybody know what time the Steeler game is nexted week at KC?????
JaKe
|
35.725 | TNT | LJOHUB::MFFL::Straub | ...salsa, selzer... | Tue Oct 20 1992 09:40 | 5 |
| Re. -1
I believe the Steelers-Chiefs game is the Sunday night, 8:00 eastern time.
Dave
|
35.726 | yup | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:45 | 8 |
| -< TNT >-
Re. -1
I believe the Steelers-Chiefs game is the Sunday night, 8:00 eastern time.
Dave
|
35.727 | | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Tue Oct 20 1992 12:06 | 7 |
|
That's kinda strange having back to back night games..
Should make for fun watching tho.
/Jeff
|
35.728 | not often I'll pull for the Squeelers | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 20 1992 15:29 | 3 |
| Go Squeelers !!! Slap KC
BG
|
35.729 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:26 | 7 |
| Found a schedule today and the TNT Sunday night game at Kc is starting
at 7:30.
Thanks to those that replied.
JaKe
|
35.730 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:29 | 7 |
| Perhaps this belongs in the question note, but why, all of a sudden,
are the TNT games starting at 7:30?
Earlier this season they were starting at 8pm?
'SAw
|
35.731 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:33 | 1 |
| Daylight savings time?
|
35.732 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:14 | 7 |
| re: 7:30 pm start
It's to try to get a lead in crowd interested in the game so they won't
switch to a LCS game or game 7 of the World Series.
Dennis Faust
|
35.733 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:24 | 7 |
| > It's to try to get a lead in crowd interested in the game so they won't
> switch to a LCS game or game 7 of the World Series.
>
\
Oh......
|
35.734 | no problem JaKe | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:09 | 4 |
| Well, it won't work this week... KC will have the game all but won
in the first quarter... ;^)
Bg
|
35.735 | STEELERS now 4-2, tied for AFC Central lead | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 20:50 | 39 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
Cincy 0 0 0 0 0
STEELERS 3 7 0 10 20
SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Anderson, 21 yd FG
STEELERS--Stone, 24 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Stone, 5 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson, 27 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
Cincy STEELERS
6 First Downs 26
19-48 Rushes-Yds 37-173
11-24-0 Compl-Att-Int 23-37-0
70 Passing Yds 251
3-16 Sacked-Yds lost 4-36
8-47 Punts 5-44
8-49 Penalties-Yds 3-20
21:25 Time of Possession 38:25
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
Rushing:
Cincy--H.Green 12-45, Fenner 6-4, Esiason 1-(-1)
STEELERS--Foster 24-108, L. Thompson 8-33, Stone 2-25, Hoge 1-7, W.Williams 2-0
PASSING:
Cincy: Esiason 11-22-0, 86 yds, Hollas 0-2-0
STEELERS--O'Donnell 23-37-0, 2 TD's, 287 yds
RECEIVING:
Cincy--McGee 3-33, H.Green 3-8, Pickens 2-25, Brennan 2-14, C.Thompson 1-6.
STEELERS--Graham 7-115, Stone 6-58, Mills 3-52, L.Thompson 2-25, Hoge 2-8,
Foster 1-21, Jorden 1-6, E.Green 1-2.
JaKe
|
35.736 | STEELERS UNOFFICIAL STATS thru 6 games | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 21:07 | 52 |
|
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 16 36 6 53 111
Opponent 20 33 7 14 74
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 12 9 45
Foster 3 0 0 18
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 140 642 4.59
Hoge 26 108 4.15
Stone 6 73 12.01
THompson 10 34 3.40
O'Donnell 13 1 0.77
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % Yds TD
O'Donnell 179 106 3 59.2 1375 6
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 34 536 15.8
Stone 21 339 16.1
Hoge 13 121 9.3
Foster 11 95 8.6
Mills 9 123 13.7
Cooper 7 84 12.0
E.Green 4 38 9.5
Thompson 3 32 10.3
Jorden 2 14 7.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Davenport 1 13 13.0
JaKe
|
35.737 | Pit could be tough before the 21st century | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Oct 21 1992 11:46 | 6 |
| Man Cincy is really bad... Too bad I'm afraid to beat the
Clowns even once. Clevescum may make 8-8 after all.
BG
FWIW O'Donnell look like he's gonna be real good real soon !!
|
35.738 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:17 | 9 |
| 1 2 3 4
STEELERS xx xx 6 xx
Oppenents xx xx 7 xx
Guess this means that when half-time comes, you can go mow the
lawn or clean the car, then come back for the 4th, cause the
third ain't worth watching if you enjoy points 8^)
|
35.739 | STEELERS win 27-3, now 5-2, No TDS lasted 2 gms | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 26 1992 01:06 | 30 |
| It was the first meeting of new Head Coach Bill Cowher against his
former boss Marty Schottenheimer and the KC Chiefs.
The guys in black and gold did a lot tonite to gain some respect.
In beating the Chiefs, 27-3, they went over the first of many hurdles and
now remain tied with the Oilscum for the AFC Central lead with a 5-2
record.
The defense was the real story tonight, intercepting Dave Krieg
2 times(or was it 3), and stuffing the Chiefs running AND passing attacks.
On the offense's side of the field, Barry Foster ran for ~105 yards
and ran for a TD while regaining the lead among NFL rushers, as Emmit SMith
had temporarily taken the lead earlier in the day. Neil O'Donnell, while not
at top form, played formidably, completing passes important to keeping some
drives going, and completing one TD pass to Eric Green. O'Donnell was not
intercepted in the game, leaving him with 7 TD passes, while only having an
AFC low 3 interceptions.
Rod Woodson's 80 yd punt return for a TD was a work of art, and the
game was never really close from there. Gary Anderson added 49 yd and 30
yard field goals in the first half for the Steelers first half 13 points.
Eddie Murray, subbing for injured KC Chiefs kicker Nick Lowery(who is psycho,
BTW), got the only points on the board with a 52 yard FG that barely made it.
Woodson also had 4 solo tackles.
Next week the Oilscum come into 3 Rivers for what will be a TOUGH
divisional matchup. Actually, the nexted 3 weeks are tough for the
Steelers, facing the Oilscum here, the Bills in Buffalo, and then the
Lions here in Pittsburgh.
On cloud nine
JaKe
|
35.740 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 26 1992 09:26 | 13 |
| The thing that impressed me a lot was how INTENSE Cowher is.
Every time a squad came off he'd be pumping them up.
I'll tell you the team looked impressive last night. If this keeps up,
the team will be going places.
btw, I like they guy they got playing Nose Tackle. A guy after me own
heart.....
'Saw
|
35.741 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 26 1992 11:10 | 9 |
|
Yes, the Steelers are now looking like they are *not* just another .500
team playing over their heads for a few games. One of the two Steelers'
games I've gotten to see was the Browns game when I was in Pittsburgh,
and I didn't think much of them. It's beginning to look as if that
game was the exception...
glenn
|
35.742 | DEFENSE DEFENSE | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:38 | 17 |
| This is two games in a row where the Steeler's looked dominating. You
couldn't read too much out of the Cincy game since the Bengals are a
a very weak team but their victory over a very good Chief team in
Arrowhead Stadium has to turn a few heads. I always felt the Steelers
had a good defense the last few years but under J e Walt n, their offense
always went 3 downs and out. That put too much pressure on the defense
and sooner or later, some cracks started to appear. Now that they have
Cowher and a new offensive coordinator who knows how the use the talent
available, the offense is playing respectable football and making the
other team work. Thus, when the defense gets on the field, they are rested
and look awesome.
Can't wait to hear the cries of DEFENSE, DEFENSE again in 3 rivers stadium.
The place will be rockin next weekend when the Houscum Oinklers slip into
town.
Keith
|
35.743 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 26 1992 13:08 | 8 |
| If you look at the Giants offense in the Super Bowl years, that is what
Pittsburgh is trying to accomplish. Looks like they have the running
backs for it....
And man, what a secondary!
'Saw
|
35.744 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:29 | 5 |
|
Squeelers looking tough... Guess I'll be a fan again this week
against the Soilers.
BG
|
35.745 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:40 | 19 |
| I think the reason for the resurgence in the Steelers is the different
coaching styles of Bill Cowher and his predecessor, Chuck Noll. Noll
had become complacent in his OLD age, and his practices were no longer
tight and structured. The discipline wasn't there either.
Let anybody pull what the Bunghole player pulled on Shula during the
game lasted Monday night, and they'd be outta here before the clock
struck midnight.
Seem some Bunghole player had f__ked up bigtime during a play, and when
he left the field, SHula started giving him the what for, and the guy
reached up, flicked off Shula's hat, and walked away. They say Shula
wasn't happy, but also didn't discipline the guy by what I heard.
Cowher woulda probably put the guy in orbit, cause you let one guy walk
on ya like that, and others will try, too.
JaKe
|
35.746 | STEELERS now 5-2, Houston Nexted week in 3Rivers | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 26 1992 21:24 | 43 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 7 6 7 7 27
Chiefs 0 3 0 0 3
SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Woodson, 80 yd punt return(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson, 49 yd
STEELERS--FG Anderson, 30 yd
Chiefs----FG Murray, 52 yd
STEELERS--Foster, 4 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--E.Green 4 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Chiefs
16 1st Downs 14
40-154 Rushes-Yds 26-121
109 Passing Yds 58
13-22-0 Compl-Att-Int 9-27-3
1-5 Sacked-Yds lost 2-24
5-50 Punts 5-45
0-0 Fumbles-Lost 3-0
11-101 Penalties-Yds 6-40
35:31 Time of Possession 24:29
Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS: Foster 24-105, L.Thompson 6-32, Stone 2-11, Hoge 3-6, O'Donnell
5-0
Chiefs: Okoye 11-73, Word 8-32, McNair 2-14, H.Williams 3-12, Anders 1-1,
Davis 1-(-11)
Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 13-22-0, 114 yds, 1td
Chiefs: Krieg 9-27-3 82 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS: L.Thompson 4-47, Cooper 3-27, Green 3-21, Foster 1-12, Hoge 1-5,
Mills 1-2
Chiefs: Birden 4-46, McNair 4-27, W.Davis 1-9
JaKe
|
35.747 | | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Tue Oct 27 1992 09:40 | 9 |
| Yeah, If they will only leave the Steelers as underdogs for the
rest of the season....
Sure wish we got TNT in Cow Hampshire!
Bill
p.s. JaKe, with that p-name I'd have to stop noting for 3 weeks! ;^)
|
35.748 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Oct 27 1992 12:18 | 5 |
| Bill,
I live in Nashua and get TNT. What's the deal?
Scott
|
35.749 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:37 | 12 |
| Bill,
It was a fair wager, and I lost.
I cain't do without noting fer a week, so I'll live with it, but will
have to get the P_name space disinfected afterwards, probably.
I agree on them making the Steelers underdogs. They're 4-0 as
underdogs, 1-2 as favorites.
JaKe
|
35.750 | where did I put that cable stretcher anyway... | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:40 | 16 |
| >> Bill,
>> I live in Nashua and get TNT. What's the deal?
>> Scott
Next time the Steelers are on TNT either we are going to have to
sting up a cable between Nashua and Merrimack or else I'll just
have to make the LONG trip south. ;^)
By the way, Scott, got another comforable chair in front of the
TV? Not too far from the fridge I hope! [lotsa ;^)]
Bill
|
35.751 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:49 | 11 |
|
> It was a fair wager, and I lost.
Something is definitely amiss, though, when the Pirates win the NL
East, the Mets finish damn near last, Toronto wins it all, and you're
still forced to run a "Mets in '93" p-string. This is not the same
in-your-face kind of thing as the Penguins taking down the Strangers.
I think you wuz had, JaKe...
glenn
|
35.752 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:51 | 8 |
| Nah, we made the wager back when I was up there in Taxachewshits and we
was tilting cold ones. I said if the Bucs made it to the WS they'd win
it, and TCM said if the Jays made it there they'd win it, so we wagered
and I went down. No biggee, I'll get TCM back this year in the Hockey
playoffs, AGAIN!!!!
JaKe
|
35.753 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:56 | 7 |
|
> No biggee, I'll get TCM back this year in the Hockey playoffs, AGAIN!!!!
You're on JaKe, details to be determined in March/April.
The Crazy Met
|
35.754 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:00 | 9 |
| I knew you wouldn't be able to resist the hockey thang again, TCM.
It'll be great having ya wear a Pens P-name fer, lessee, how long DID
you have that thing earlier this year, it seemed like a month or two!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
35.755 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:01 | 6 |
| It was for the series against Boston, Chicago and then for 2 more
weeks. However, since this year the Pens will probably be favored it
won't be for that long a time - if I lose.
The Crazy Met
|
35.756 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:14 | 16 |
|
>> <<< Note 35.755 by ACESMK::FRANCUS "Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name" >>>
>>It was for the series against Boston, Chicago and then for 2 more
>>weeks. However, since this year the Pens will probably be favored it
>>won't be for that long a time - if I lose.
>>The Crazy Met
You're just lucky the Pens played as good as they did, cause they
knocked of both of those losers in 4 games, so ya only had to keep it
fer 8 days per series, had those series both gone to 7 games, ya would
have had to wear that fer another 12 days or so.
JaKe
|
35.757 | STEELERS Unofficial stats, record is 5-2 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 22:46 | 55 |
|
Scoring by Quarter
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 23 42 13 60 138
Opponent 20 36 7 14 77
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 14 12 54
Foster 4 0 0 24
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
E.Green 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 165 747 4.53
Hoge 29 114 3.93
Stone 8 84 10.50
THompson 16 66 4.13
O'Donnell 18 1 0.06
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % Yds TD
O'Donnell 201 119 3 59.2 1489 7
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 34 536 15.8
Stone 21 339 16.1
Hoge 14 126 9.0
Foster 12 107 8.9
Mills 10 125 12.5
Cooper 10 111 11.1
Thompson 7 79 11.3
E.Green 7 60 8.6
Jorden 2 14 7.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Davenport 1 13 13.0
JaKe
|
35.758 | Thank You Al Del Greco | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Sun Nov 01 1992 18:08 | 23 |
| THESE GUYS MAY BE FOR REAL, AFTER ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Steelers beat the Oilscum today, 21-20.
They came back after trailing 20-7 going into the fourth quarter. It's
the second time this season they've beat the Oilscum, and the firsted
time since 1986 that they've swept the season series with Houscum, and
the secondtime they've came back from a deficit to beat the Oilscum
this season.
Barry Foster had hissixth 100 yard performance in 8 games, and ran for
1 td while O'Donnell hit tight ends Adrian Cooper and Eric Green for
the Steelers other two TD's. Hell, a few years ago the Steelers didn't
even throw to the TE's, letalone let them score.
More tomorrow.
THE STEELERS ARE IN FRISTED PLACE IN THE AFC CENTRAL, with a 6-2
record.
JaKe
|
35.759 | Sentence Served, see P_name!!!! | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Sun Nov 01 1992 18:09 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
35.760 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 02 1992 09:36 | 7 |
|
Had to chuckle at the picture of Cowher standing there on the sidelines,
grinning like he knew Del Greco would choke... what is it about the
Oilers?
glenn
|
35.761 | Steelers in command now | LJOHUB::HAUSRATH | | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:13 | 8 |
|
I was suprised the Oilies didn't use the clock more effectively down
the stretch and at least attempt to get a touchdown. Face it,
fieldgoals are never guaranteed, especially 39 yarders.
Poor coaching, plain and simple.
/Jeff
|
35.762 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 02 1992 12:49 | 12 |
| The Steelers played their hearts out yesterday. The sounds of "Defense
Defense" and "Here we go Steelers" in 3 Rivers Stadium are music to my ears.
The won lost column in the AFC central show the Steelers with a 1 game lead,
but in effect, it's a 2 game lead since they beat the Oilers twice.
The Steeler's will have another big test next weekend in Buffalo. I hope
they're the underdogs again. At least everytime they have been an underdog,
they won.
Black and Gold are great football colors.
Keith
|
35.763 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:32 | 6 |
| BET DEM UNDERDOG STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Happily
JaKe
|
35.764 | Go Steelers - as long as you're playing the bad guys | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:37 | 4 |
| So the Steelers are playing Luckalo next week. Looks like I'll have to
pull for Pittsburgh for the 3rd week in a row.
Joe
|
35.765 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:43 | 29 |
| Lessee, two weeks in a row, I go into the game with lots of beer and
munchies so's I cain get fat and drunk and not worry whether they lost
or not, and two weeks in a row, they come thru and beat tough teams.
Headed fer "Beer World" before nexted Sunday's game abainst the Bills,
that's fer sure.
BTW, anybody able to tell me what time nexted weeks game starts?????
Cain't find a schedule.
Stats from the game in here tonite.
BTW, any of youse actually get to watch this game????? If so, Why the
f___ did Cooper get 15 yards for "taunting" when all he did was spike
the ball when some Oilscum player was nearby???? ALso, did the
officiating seem one-sided AGAINST the Steelers fer the first three
quarters?? At one point, the Steelers had amassed 8 penalties for a
mile and a half, and the "angelic" Oilscum had NO PENALTIES at all!!!
Now, since when does a Houscum team go fer three quarters without
comitting SOME kind of infraction. NOt since the days of Bum Phillips.
Also, anybody see the segment on the pregame show about the classic
Steeler-Oilscum playoff matchups of the late '70s???? Great segment,
IMHO.
JaKe
|
35.766 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:49 | 4 |
| � Now, since when does a Houscum team go fer three quarters without
� comitting SOME kind of infraction.
Since they canned Glanville?
|
35.767 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:54 | 18 |
| > BTW, any of youse actually get to watch this game????? If so, Why the
> f___ did Cooper get 15 yards for "taunting" when all he did was spike
> the ball when some Oilscum player was nearby???? ALso, did the
I didn't see the game. I can tell you however that this "taunting" rule
has wild swings in interpretation. To me, it is bogus and should go.
Now, what's with this "youse". I thought the word was "yunz". Now,
my ex-fianc�e from EASTERN Pennsylvania used to use "youse" all the time.
I assumed that the folks in the east said "youse" and you dere Pittsburgers
said "yunz".
What gives?
'Saw
|
35.768 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:00 | 8 |
| Youse, Younze, you say tom-ah-to, I say to-may-to, Quayle says potatoe.
Mux Nix.
Both are used around here, but I fergot the "n", to tell the trufe.
JaKe
|
35.769 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President!!!!!!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:04 | 4 |
|
My guess is it's a 4:00 game. NBC/AFC is in the doubleheader bubble this
coming week. I'm sure they'd want to have a premier game as the second
game of the week....
|
35.770 | smileys appended | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:08 | 7 |
| 'Saw
'ya gotta be understandin. Kev's notes have begun to sound like
English, so JaKe is taking over the RCASO heritage.
The Crazy Met
|
35.771 | | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:11 | 8 |
| re: yunz, youse...
According to my O-fishal Pittsburghese dictionary...yunz is most common,
but since Pittsburghers are anything but standardized, any similar
variation will do.
Bill
|
35.772 | encircled by womens-libers !!!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:17 | 9 |
| Saw the Squeelers/Soilers game... Fun to watch !!! Got my first taste
of baby sitting an infant. My sister just had a kid about a month ago
and asked if I could watch the little bugger while she ran an out to a
NOW rally with my other Sister, my Mother and my Girl Friend. What a
trip that was... I decided I'm not ready for kids !!!
BG
|
35.773 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:23 | 12 |
|
>> Got my first taste
>>of baby sitting an infant.
What, did Elway come over to your house yesterday????????
How bout them Stillers, BG??
JaKe
|
35.774 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:37 | 9 |
| Squeelers looking pretty tough... Me and some of the boys were
just talking about the fact the we were glad that the Squeelers weren't
heading out to Denver this season. They always give the Donks fits
even when they suck !!...
I'll tell ya, that baby stuff is for the birds !! 2 hours is way to
long... let alone your entire life.
BG
|
35.775 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:43 | 47 |
| This says it all
Central
>>Pittsburgh 6 2 0 .750 159 97
Houston 5 3 0 .625 199 141
Cleveland 4 4 0 .500 117 131
Cincinnati 3 5 0 .375 139 184
1 2 3 4 T
Houston 3 3 14 0 20
STEELERS 0 7 0 14 21
Hou--FG Del Greco 29
Hou--FG Del Greco 19
STEELERS--Foster 1 run (Anderson PAT)
Hou--Slaughter 11 pass from Carlson (Del Greco PAT)
Hou--Childress 8 fumble return (Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS--Cooper 2 pass from O'Donnell (Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Green 5 pass from O'Donnell (Anderson PAT)
A--58,074
------
Hou Pit
21 First Downs 20
15-55 Rushes-Yds 35-119
228 Passing Yds 181
28-42-0 Compl-Att-Int 14-22-1
3-20 Sacked-Yds Lost 2-13
3-44.7 Punts 4-41.8
1-1 Fumbles-Lost 2-2
5-29 Penalties 9-101
28:35 Time Of Posession 31:25
RUSHING:
Houston--White 12-44, Moon 2-11, Carlson 1-0
STEELERS--Foster 31-118, Hoge 1-3, O'Donnell 2-2, Thompson 1-(-4)
PASSING:
Houston--Moon 13-19-0-104, Carlson 15-23-0-137
STEELERS--O'Donnell14-22-1 201 yds
RECEIVING
Houston--Jeffires 9-68, White 6-32, Slaughter 5-71, Givins 5-47, Duncan 3-23
STEELERS--Mills 4-61, Green 3-52, Foster2-15, Stone 1-20, Thompson 1-20,
Hoge 1-20, Graham 1-11, Cooper 1-2.
|
35.776 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:58 | 15 |
| Yea, I couldn't believe that ref who threw the flag for spikin the ball.
Where'd they get that guy from anyways, Romper-Room ??
Next thing ya know, they'll be dropping flags for spittin or sayin cuss
words.
How'd everyone like that big 3rd and 15 completion to the Green monster
where a couple of defensive backs bounced off him after he caught the ball.
It didn't look like those defensive backs liked the idea of trying to tackle
a Mack truck.
What's the status on Dwight Stone's injury ? The play where he was knocked
out of the game looked like a late hit to me. The Black and Gold will need
his big play capability next week.
Keith
|
35.777 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Nov 02 1992 17:11 | 20 |
|
Another issue was why in heavens name wasn't this game the BIG
game for NBC? Man, the Steelers get no respect. Instead, Endberg
and Trumpy were in NYC for the Jets and the Dolphins!
I guess money does make the world go around and the NYC market
was chosen in hopes of drawing more fans to the tube.
But, clearly, this game was the game of the day yesterday. Not
only for 1st place, but the game itself was between rivals and came
down to the last play!
Once again, NBC fails to deliever...especially up here in NE!!
Maybe next week I'll get to see them since they are playing the
Bills.
bill..g.
|
35.778 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 02 1992 17:18 | 8 |
|
Part of it is that NY is a big market, but they could have show it
locally and maybe not lost too much. Jets-Miami is a big rivalry. They
always put on an aerial display; so in this case I am not sure that
Jets-Miami as the national game is as ridiculous as .777 states.
The Crazy Met
|
35.779 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 02 1992 17:19 | 15 |
|
> Another issue was why in heavens name wasn't this game the BIG
> game for NBC? Man, the Steelers get no respect. Instead, Endberg
> and Trumpy were in NYC for the Jets and the Dolphins!
Steelers-Oilers was the game being hyped nationally in TV ads on
Saturday. I don't know why they didn't have the #1 team on it, but
they were pushing this matchup as the national game. Even if it had
been a colossal Super Bowl rematch of undefeateds, we weren't going
to get it in New England, though, because the Patriots were playing
at the same time and they weren't at home where the blackout could
have spared us...
glenn
|
35.780 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Whoa Black Betty, wham-a-bam... | Mon Nov 02 1992 17:23 | 1 |
| Albany got Bills-Pats... Utica got Jets-Dolphins..
|
35.781 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 02 1992 17:52 | 3 |
| Pitt-Luckalo is at 4 eastern nexted week.
Joe
|
35.784 | GO STEELERS!!!!!!!Unofficial stats thru 8 gmaes | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Tue Nov 03 1992 00:09 | 64 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 23 49 13 74 159
Opponent 23 39 21 14 97
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 14 15 57
Foster 5 0 0 30
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Team Stats:
STEELERS Opponents
151 First Downs 120
272-1121 Rushes/yds 185-731
1592 Passing Yds 1399
134-224-4 Comp-Att-Int 127-243-15
20-145 Sacked/yds lost 13-91
13-11 Fumbles-lost 10-5
52-457 Penalties-yards 57-434
33:11 Time of Possession 26:49
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 196 865 4.41
Hoge 30 117 3.90
Stone 8 84 10.50
THompson 18 62 3.44
O'Donnell 20 3 0.15
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % Yds TD
O'Donnell 223 133 4 59.6 1690 9
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 35 547 15.6
Stone 22 359 16.3
Hoge 15 146 9.7
Foster 14 122 8.7
Mills 14 186 13.3
Cooper 11 113 10.3
E.Green 10 112 11.2
Thompson 8 99 12.4
Jorden 2 14 7.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
Davenport 1 13 13.0
JaKe
|
35.785 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | This Space Being Dis-Infected!! | Tue Nov 03 1992 00:09 | 14 |
|
The stats in -.1 are inaccurate in the "fumbles-lost" area because I
don't have the fumbles stats from teh Monday night game against
Cincinnati.
Anybody out there have that stat?????
I'd appreciate it.
thanks
JaKe
|
35.786 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Tue Nov 03 1992 08:24 | 3 |
| Steelers should win easy this week. NOBODY wins after playing the
Pats the week before. Takes a while for the stench to wear off I guess!
Denny
|
35.787 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Tue Nov 03 1992 09:46 | 18 |
| re Yunz-Youse:
Oh, I just thought that Youse was the Eastern Pennsylvania
variation.
At any rate, I think it's neat.
re Pitt-Hous:
I too was disappointed not to see that game. I had a choice
of NY-Miami on WVIT-TV30 out of New Britain CT, or
Buff-NE on TV22 out of Springfield...... Yuk to both....
'Saw
|
35.788 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 03 1992 11:20 | 4 |
| Bill G., New England is in the AFC East. There are alot of New York
fans in New England. The Dolphins are a main contender in the AFC
East. Given all that, I'm not surprised that the Jets/Dolphins game
was carried in New England rather than an AFC Central game.
|
35.789 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Vote Early AND Often!! | Tue Nov 03 1992 15:44 | 7 |
| Thanks fer the KoD, Denny!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
35.790 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Nov 05 1992 12:29 | 19 |
|
Wow, I never said anything to the issue of why the game wasn't
on in my area here in NE. I was questioning why Enberg and Trumpey,
NBC's no. 1 team was in NYC doing the Jets/Miami game.
Even if the Steeler/Oiler game was the No. 1 game, I wouldn't of
seen it. My problem dealt with the issue of why NBC's no. 1 team
wasn't doing that game.
Personally, because of where I live, I hardly ever get to see
the Steelers play unless they are on in prime time or are on at a
different time then the Patriots and then only if the Jets are
playing Monday night. Hey, it comes with the territory. But my main
beef still is the fact that if NBC's no. 1 game was Pitt/Houston, where
was the no. 1 broadcast team?
bill..g.
|
35.791 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Thu Nov 05 1992 13:21 | 2 |
| Bills/Stillers are on Ch4 @4:00.
Denny
|
35.792 | STEELERS LOSE, Green gone fer 6 games | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Mon Nov 09 1992 15:33 | 24 |
| Steelers lose to the Bills, but didn't look totally horrible in doi8ng
so. The guys just don't quit, though. The Steelers still have to look
upward to see the AFC's top teams, but the view ain't as bad as it used
to be. They trailied 21-6 at the half, the closed it to 21-13 but gave
up a quick score to the Bills to fall behind 28-13. The Steelers got
one more TD, as O'Donnell threw his second TD of the day, closing the
game to 28-20, which also was the final score. Berry Foster was held
to 77 yards on 22 carries. Eric Green led the Steelers with 4 catches.
The big, in more ways than one, story here in Pittsburgh today is that
TE Eric Green has been suspended for six weeks by the NFL for substance
abuse. The report said it is not steroids, either, so he's evidently
done some nose candy or toking. SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIT!!!!
Rooney said the help is there if Green needs it, Cowher said he's
disappointed but it's a team sport and the show must go on, with or
without Green, and Green apologized fer letting his teammates down.
Green will be eligible, if he clears, to return to the Steelers just
before their lasted game of the season, against the Brown(spot)s(tm).
JaKe
|
35.793 | musta been the second time | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:10 | 13 |
| re: Green.
If'n the punishment is a 6 week suspension, that means that this is the
second time Eric has been caught. They way I understand the rules, the
firsted time you violate the drug rules you get a private warning with no
suspension. 6 weeks means you're a repeat offender.
And as to how big a loss this is, didn't the Steelers do OK if not well
without him earlier this year when he was out?
In any case JaKe, just be glad Detroit is coming to town.
TTom
|
35.794 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:16 | 8 |
| Adrian Cooper is just as good as Green, at least that's how he looked
when Green was out with the shoulder injury.
Yer right TTom, this is #2 offense, as teams are prohibited from
releasing the news when the first offense is taken care of.
JaKe
|
35.795 | Beebe is a STEELER killer--STEELERS now 6-3 | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Mon Nov 09 1992 20:29 | 50 |
|
SCORING SUMMARY
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 6 14 0 20
Bills 7 14 7 0 28
Bills--Lofton 22 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG
Bills--Frerotte 2 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 50 yd FG
STEELERS--Mills 12 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Bills--Lofton 45 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Hoge 10 yd pass fromO'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Bills
16 First Downs 31
25-86 Rushes-Yds 44-174
147 Passing Yds 284
15-25-0 Compl-Att-Int 26-33-0
1-12 Sacked-Yds lost 1-6
5-48 Punts 2-30
1-0 Fumbles-Lost 3-2
10-73 Penalties-Yds 7-60
27:28 Time of Possession 32:32
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 22-77, Thompson 2-8, Hoge 1-1
Bills--Thomas 37-155, Davis 4-16, Kelly 3-3
PASSING:
STEELERS--O'Donnell 15-24-0,159 yds 2 TD's, Foster 0-1-0 0yds.
Bills--Kelly 26-33-0, 290 yds 2 TD's.
RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Green 4-41, Foster 4-36, Davenport 3-44, Hoge 2-18, Mills 1-12,
Thompson 1-8
Bills--Beebe 8-101, McKeller 5-59, Thomas 4-30, Lofton 3-79, Reed 2-2, Tasker
1-7, Metzelaars 1-6, Davis 1-4, Frerotte 1-2.
JaKe
|
35.796 | STEELERS 6-3, 1 game up in AFC Central | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Mon Nov 09 1992 20:48 | 72 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 23 55 27 74 179
Opponent 30 53 28 14 125
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 16 17 65
Foster 5 0 0 30
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
E.Mills 1 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 6
Team Stats:
STEELERS Opponents
167 First Downs 151
297-1207 Rushes/yds 229-905
1739 Passing Yds 1683
149-249-4 Comp-Att-Int 153-276-15
21-157 Sacked/yds lost 14-97
14-11 Fumbles-lost 13-7
62-530 Penalties-yards 64-494
32:33 Time of Possession 27:27
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 218 942 4.32
Hoge 31 118 3.81
Stone 8 84 10.50
THompson 19 70 3.68
O'Donnell 20 3 0.15
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % Yds TD
O'Donnell 247 148 4 59.9 1849 11
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44 0
Foster 0 0 0 0.0 0 0
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 35 547 15.6
Stone 22 359 16.3
Foster 18 158 8.8
Hoge 17 164 9.6
Mills 15 198 13.2
E.Green 14 153 10.9
Cooper 11 113 10.3
Thompson 9 107 11.9
Davenport 4 57 14.3
Jorden 2 14 7.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
JaKe
|
35.797 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Nov 10 1992 01:25 | 5 |
| Actually Steelers lead Houston by 2 since they beat Houston twice this
season and would get the nod in a tiebreaker with the Oilers.
The Crazy Met
|
35.798 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Nov 10 1992 10:31 | 1 |
| But they are not 2 games up over Cleveland.
|
35.799 | A couple of STEELER notes | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Wed Nov 11 1992 19:46 | 9 |
| Neil O'Donnell has a very respectable 91.3 QB raitng after 9 starts
this year.
The Steelers activated TE Russ Campbell, who had broken his hand in the
season opener in Houston, to backup Adrian Cooper, with Eric Green out
on suspension.
JaKe
|
35.800 | STEELER now 7-3, 1 game up in AFC Central | PFSVAX::JACOB | Was Bush Cursed?I'd Haiti to think so | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:09 | 66 |
| It was U G L Y, but a win is a win.
1 2 3 4 T
Detroit 0 7 0 7 14
STEELERS 7 3 0 7 17
SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Mills 11 yd pass from O'Donnell(ANderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 20 yd FG
Detroit--Green 73 yd pass from Kramer(Hanson PAT)
Detroit--Sanders 1 yd run(Hanson PAT)
STEELERS--Jorden 1 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
TEAM STATS:
Detroit STEELERS
20 First downs 18
23-90 Rushes-Yds 30-152
286 Passing Yds 164
20-37-2 Compl-Att-Int 19-35-1
3-18 Sacked-Yds Lost 3-33
5-32 Punts 6-38
5-4 Fumbles-Lost 2-1
8-64 Penalties 10-102
25:50 Time of Possession 34:10
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Detroit--Sanders 21-94, Kramer 2-(-4)
STEELERS--Foster 25-106, Mills 1-20, Thompson 1-13, O'Donnell 2-8,
Hoge 1-5.
PASSING:
Detroit--Kramer 20-37-2, 304 yds, 2TD's
STEELERS--O'Donnell 17-31-1, 182 yds 1 TD, Brister 2-4-0, 15 yds 1 TD
RECEIVING:
Detroit--Green 6-115, Perriman 5-89, Moore 5-71, Sanders 3-23, McLemore 1-6
STEELERS--Foster 5-52, Mills 4-43, Didio 3-39, Davenport 2-32, Thompson 1-15,
Hoge 1-7, Cooper 1-6, THigpen 1-2, Jorden 1-1.
Mark Didio was activated from the practice squad Saturday, and caught three
passes for the Steelers, all third down completions for first downs.
Barry Foster had his 7th 100-yard game of the season, tying the club record
set by Harris in 1975. Foster needs only 198 yards to set the all-time
Steeler record for one season, also held by Harris and set in 1975, at 1,246.
Foster has 1,048 right now.
Foster is only the 4th Steeler running back in their 60 year history to run
for 1,000 yards in a season, including Franco Harris, Rocky Bleier, and
I ain't sure who the fourth was.
Brister took his first snaps of the 1992 season, and made a decent play fake
on the 1 yd TD pass to Tim Jorden.
No word yet on the severity of O'Donnell's hamstring pull, but speculation
is that he WILL miss next weeks game against the Colts.
JaKe
|
35.801 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my hero & mentor | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:44 | 4 |
|
Jake have they put Dwight Stone on the IR list?
mike
|
35.802 | | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Mon Nov 16 1992 12:32 | 16 |
| >>Foster is only the 4th Steeler running back in their 60 year history to run
>>for 1,000 yards in a season, including Franco Harris, Rocky Bleier, and
>>I ain't sure who the fourth was.
JaKe,
I'd guess that the fourth would be John Henry Johnson.
re: next week
I wouldn't worry too much about next week. Hell, if the Pats can
beat the Colts, even Mrs Brister's little boy Bubby should be able to handle
the task.
Bill
|
35.803 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Was Bush Cursed?I'd Haiti to think so | Mon Nov 16 1992 15:31 | 10 |
|
>>Jake have they put Dwight Stone on the IR list?
Mike,
Not to my knowledge. 'sfar as I know, he just keeps being de-activated
each week.
JaKe
|
35.804 | STEELERS 7-3, UNOFFICIAL STATS | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!! | Mon Nov 16 1992 17:53 | 89 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 30 58 27 81 196
Opponent 30 60 28 21 139
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 17 19 70
Foster 5 0 0 30
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
E.Mills 2 0 0 12
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 6
Jorden 1 0 0 6
Team Stats:
TEAM STATS:
Detroit STEELERS
20 First downs 18
23-90 Rushes-Yds 30-152
286 Passing Yds 164
20-37-2 Compl-Att-Int 19-35-1
3-18 Sacked-Yds Lost 3-33
5-32 Punts 6-38
5-4 Fumbles-Lost 2-1
8-64 Penalties 10-102
25:50 Time of Possession 34:10
STEELERS Opponents
183 First Downs 170
328-1367 Rushes/yds 252-995
1895 Passing Yds 1973
168-284-5 Comp-Att-Int 173-313-17
24-195 Sacked/yds lost 16-104
17-13 Fumbles-lost 21-14
71-627 Penalties-yards 72-558
32:45 Time of Possession 27:15
Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 243 1048 4.31
Hoge 32 123 3.84
Stone 8 84 10.50
THompson 20 83 4.15
Mills 1 20 20.00
O'Donnell 22 11 0.50
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % Yds TD
O'Donnell 278 165 5 59.4 2031 12
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44 0
Brister 4 2 0 50.0 15 1
Foster 1 0 0 0.0 0 0
STEELERS--Foster 5-52, Mills 4-43, Didio 3-39, Davenport 2-32, Thompson 1-15,
Hoge 1-7, Cooper 1-6, THigpen 1-2, Jorden 1-1.
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 35 547 15.6
Foster 23 190 8.3
Stone 22 359 16.3
Mills 19 241 12.7
Hoge 19 151 7.9
E.Green 14 152 10.9
Cooper 12 119 9.9
Thompson 10 122 12.2
Davenport 6 89 14.8
Didio 3 39 13.0
Jorden 3 15 5.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
JaKe
|
35.805 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!! | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:08 | 29 |
| Neil O'Donnell, who has led the Steelers to a 7-3 start, their best
since 1983, is out indefinitely.
O'Donnell's injury was diagnosed as a pulled hamstring. He was walking
gingerly, without crutches, when he reported to 3 RIvers Stadium
Monday, wearing a bandage on his upper left leg.
It is unlikely that O'Donnell will even practice this week, and he is
not expected to be in uniform for the game against Indianapolis Sunday.
Former Steeler backup QB Rick Strom had a workout with the Steelers
yesterday, but did not sign a contract. It is possible he will sign
later this week. He has been an off and on Steeler since 1989, and was
cut prior to this season. He lives in Pittsburgh.
Walter "Bubby" Brister will get the start this Sunday, his first start
of the 1992 season. Starting against him will be Jack Trudeau, subbing
for injured QB Jeff George, who has a fractured wrist.
Brister is 26-27 in 53 starts, Trudeau is 14-25 in his 39 starts.
If the Steelers win SUnday, and they are favored by 11, they can clinch
a no worse than .500 record. Most of the media that covered them during
training camp believed the team would be fortunate to win 5 games this
season.
JaKe
|
35.806 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:26 | 4 |
| � for injured QB Jeff George, who has a fractured wrist.
When did that happen? George played the entire New England game,
including OT. I didn't notice him having any problems.
|
35.807 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:31 | 3 |
| On his lasted play Mac, the one where Tim Goad planted him in the
turf. He got up holding his hand. Says he hit it on a helmet.
Denny
|
35.808 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!! | Tue Nov 17 1992 16:18 | 35 |
| Finally remembered that Tuesday is the day Bill Cowher's news
conference is broadcast on the radio, and REMEMBERED TO LISTEN!!!
Cowher said O'Donnell will be in uniform this Sunday, but will only
play if it's emergency circumstances.
He wouldn't say who, but the Steelers will sign and have in uniform
another QB Sunday. Odds are that QB is Rick Strom, who was with the
Steelers thru pre-season, and according to Cowher, has a very good
grasp of the Steelers offense.
COwher also said that O'Donnell will miss this week, but may be back
nested week. He stated that a QB having a hamstring problem is not
like a running back or wide receiver having hamstring problems. It
just limits their mobility some.
He also said that he is concerned with the mounting problem of
penalties. The Steelers have had 40 penalties in the lasted 4 weeks.
Back to the QB situation, one reporter asked Cowher if he would
consider changing status of QB's if Brister plays like Sammy Baugh
during his tenure as substitute starter. Cowher returned that he'd
never seen Baugh play, so he wouldn't know it if Brister played like
him. He then said that Neil O'Donnell is his starting QB, and when
he's healthy enuf to play, he will assume that role once more.
A reporter also asked Cowher if he is concerned about the lack of REAL
deep threats in the Steeler passing game, and asked him how he, if he
were still DC with another team, would prepare for the Steelers.
Cowher replied that if he was DC at another team, he would be concerned
with stopping the Steelers running game, and not really worry too much
about the deep pass.
JaKe
|
35.809 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 17 1992 17:19 | 4 |
| Look for a Squeeler loss this week... Bubby is a bum and will
prove it this week !!
|
35.810 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!! | Tue Nov 17 1992 17:58 | 9 |
| Big'n'Lame
You know that and I know that BUT he's also going to be running a real
offense now, not J_e Walt_n's dog dung _ffense.
The defense will keep it in line.
JaKe
|
35.812 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | WIll Hillary run the White House?? | Tue Nov 17 1992 21:23 | 20 |
|
Another thing that Cowher addressed during the news conference was the
problems the Steelers had with the holds on two field goal attempts
Sunday.
He excused the first botched hold due to weather, as it was snowing
fiercely when the play was ran. He said the second one was completely
Royals' fault, as the snap was good enuf to get down, but the ball was
placed improperly, causing Anderson to kick it into the line.
When asked whether he was considering replacing Royals as holder,
Cowher said no. He said if he replaced a player just because of a
couple of mistakes, he would have replaced Barry Foster after game 2,
as he had fumble troubles early on in the season.
JaKe
|
35.813 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Thu Nov 19 1992 10:46 | 1 |
| Careful BG, you don't want to chomp on that bird monday!
|
35.814 | A Sad Lesson that Drugs hav no place in Da World | PFSVAX::JACOB | WIll Hillary run the White House?? | Thu Nov 19 1992 11:42 | 83 |
|
SCURRY'S SAD LESSON MAY SAVE GREEN
reprinted WITH permission from Gateway Publications, 11-18-1992
By
Jim Damp
They played different sports, but both arrived in Pittsburgh with
blaring trumpets announcing how these two young men would forever change
the face of the games they played.
Both men had the extraordinary ability to dominate games as amateurs
and, according to their reams of press clippings, would continue to do so at
the professional level.
Each man was a number one draft pick nad each was expected to help
his team hoist plenty of championship banners at 600 Stadium Circle(Note:
this is the address of Three Rivers Stadium).
Eric Green of the Steelers probably never met former Pirate Rod
Scurry.
But, it would behoove the mammoth Steeler tight end to hear the story
of the late Bucco left-hander.
Scurry led his Reno, Nev. high school team to the state championship.
Soon after, the Pirates picked the southpaw in the first round of the 1974
amateur draft. He was the 11th player selected overall.
Scurry's curve ball broke like the river in Brady's Bend(JaKenote:
Brady's Bend is a place in Pa. where the Allegheny River makes a couple of U
turns). The pitch broke so hard that he often made contact hitters look
foolish. After a six-year stint in the minor leagues, Scurry made it to
"the show" in 1980.
He was an integral part of the Pirate teams that challenged for penn-
ants in the early 1980s. Scurry was the left-handed stopper out of the
bullpen and showed flashes of brilliance that led one to believe he would
eventually reach the potential expected of a first round draft pick.
Scurry never soared to the heights that he probably could have
reached on talent alone.
In addition to being an integral part of the team a decade ago, Scurry
was also a major player in the darkest era in the history of Pittsburgh
baseball. The Bucco reliever was one of the plethora of players involved
in the drug scandal that made the Pirate clubhouse look more like a crack-
house.
This era came close to killing baseball in Pittsburgh. The same era
had a huge hand in the demise and eventual death of Rod Scurry.
Scurry, as everyone with even a remote interest in sports knows, was
a substance abuser. He was addicted to cocaine.
In this timeframe, Scurry admitted he barely cared about baseball.
All he really cared about, he said, was putting the white powder up his nose.
He often came to the ballpark loaded nad without sleeping for three days at
a time during binges.
His teammates either didn't know or didn't care. And the abuse con-
tinued.
Scurry eventually felt he was killing himself, he said, after check
ing himself out of rehabilitation for the first time. He either had to
change or would die, he told reporters. The left-hander tried. He was in
and out of rehab throughout the decade.
Earlier this month, his Reno neighbors called police to report
erratic behavior by Scurry.
Scurry told police he was being "bitten" by snakes. This type of
severe paranoia accurs in people who have used cocaine for a number of years.
He refused to cooperate with the Nevada lawmen who wanted to take Scurry to
a safer place.
A struggle ensued and Scurry lapsed into a coma. Several days later
Rod Scurry was dead, long before he reached his 40th birthday.
The National Football League and the Steelers refuse to tell us
exactly what Eric Green was abusing. But a second offense garners a suspension
so it's something he has used on more than one occasion.
A hockey player once told me that the most difficult part of being
a professional athlete is dealing with the amount of free time the job allows.
"It's easy to see how guys have alcohol and drug problems, because
our days aren't regimented," he said.
Eric Green has teh potential to redefine the position of tight end
in the NFL. He's huge, he's fast, and he has hands that are viselike when
it comes to catching passes.
There's probably not a lot Green needs to learn on the field to become
an all-pro.
Off the field, Green might need a lesson on how to better manage his
time, before his time runs out.
Like Scurry's did.
JaKe
|
35.816 | STEELERS 8-3, headed for AFC Central title | PFSVAX::JACOB | Newcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya down | Sun Nov 22 1992 17:35 | 33 |
| The Steelers beat the COlts today, 30-14. The defense played good
almost all day, 'cept fer a 81 yd brain cramp that led to the Colts
first TD. Also, Trudeau moved the Colts good in a quasi two-minute
drill, driving for one TD, then driving towards another, only to throw
an interception in the end zone.
Barry Foster set a Steeler record, rushing for 168 yards, and his 8th
100 yard game of the season, breaking Franco Harris' record of 7 100 yd
games in a season.
Foster needs less than 50 yards(don't remember the EXACT amount) to
break Harris' single season STeeler record of 1248.
Brister showed why he's a no. 2 QB, looking indecisive at times, and
throwing many incompletions way over the receiver's heads. Thanks God
Indy is one lousy team.
The Steelers chances of winning the AFC Central crown were helped
immensely today as CLevescum AND Houscum both lost. They now have a 2
game + lead(won season series) over the Oilscum, and a 3 game lead over
the Brown(spot)s(tm).
The New York Times power ratings for the NFL place the Steelers at 4th
place overall, behind San Francisco, Buffalo and Dallas.
It's about time the Steelers won big over a bad team.
More tomorrow, stats and all.
JaKe
|
35.817 | STEELERS 8-3, 2+ game lead in AFC Central!!!! | PFSVAX::JACOB | Newcastle Brown'll sure smack ya down | Mon Nov 23 1992 14:19 | 45 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
Colts 0 0 7 7 14
STEELERS 7 6 14 3 30
SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Foster 20 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 31 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 22 yd FG
Colts--Culver 1 yd run(Biasucci PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 13 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Thompson 2 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Colts--Culver 4 yd pass from Trudeau(Biasucci PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 36 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
Colts STEELERS
16 First Downs 20
21-71 Rushes-Yds 44-253
258 Passing Yds 109
19-42-3 Compl-Att-Int 10-22-1
1-8 Sacked-Yds lost 0-0
7-43 Punts 4-50
2-0 Fumbles-Lost 1-1
11-79 Penalties-Yds 5-37
22:41 Time Of Possession 37:19
Individual Stats:
RUSHING
Colts--A.Johnson 19-68, Culber 2-3,
STEELERS--Foster 28-168, Thompson 8-52, Stone 1-17, Hoge 3-14, Brister 4-2
PASSING
Colts--Trudeau 19-41-3 266 yds 1td, Tupa 0-1-0
STEELERS--Brister 10-22-1 109 yds 0 TD
RECEIVING:
Colts--Langhorne 8-98, Brooks 5-50, Hester 2-88, A.Johnson 2-4, Cash 1-22
Culver 1-4
STEELERS--Mills 4-36, Thompson 2-16, Hoge 2-6, Foster 1-42, Davenport 1-9.
JaKe
|
35.818 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 30 1992 12:36 | 13 |
|
With the Steelers at 9-3 now, and the Bills the same after an
incomprehensible loss to the Colts yesterday, Pittsburgh should be
thinking big, towards home-field advantage throughout the playoffs.
The Bills own the head-to-head tie-breaker, but have two tough road
games left the last two weeks of the season (New Orleans and Minnesota,
I think). I can't see anybody in the AFC beating Buffalo in Buffalo
(not that I expect anyone to beat them on the road, either, but at
least there's hope). The Steelers should use this as their motivation
if they continue to play this well and wrap up the AFC Central early...
glenn
|
35.819 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Mon Nov 30 1992 14:04 | 26 |
| The Bungholes started breaking in a QB yesterday who will be good competition
for Bernice Kosar. Klingler looked pretty good in uniform, but how long
will it be before he breaks out the dresses and heels he used to wear
in the TV show M*A*S*H ??????? (8^)*
A few team records fell yesterday during the Steelers' beating of the hapless
Bungholes.
1.) The Steelers had 10 sacks, most in a game in the team's
history. THe most previous was 9, also against the Bungholes
in 1983.
2.) Barry Foster eclipsed Franco Harris single season team record
of 1246, which Harris set in a 14 game season. It took Foster
only 12 games to break it.
3.) Foster also broke Harris' single season combined yardage Steeler
record.
The Steelers are one step closer to the AFC Central title, retaining a 2 game
advantage(actually more like 2-1/2 since they beat the Oilscum twice)over the
Oilscum of Houston, and a 3 game lead over the Brown(spot)s(tm).
JaKe
|
35.820 | STEELERS now 9-3 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Mon Nov 30 1992 14:05 | 39 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 7 7 7 0 21
Bengals 0 6 0 3 9
STEELERS--Davenport 34 yd fumble return(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 33 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 2 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 42 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 38 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Bengals
17 First Downs 15
33-99 Rushes-Yds 25-160
141 Passing Yds 68
10-18-1 Comp-Att-Int 16-34-0
1-8 Sacked-Yds Lost 10-72
5-45 Punts 7-40
1-1 Fumbles-Lost 2-1
2-10 Penalties 3-13
27:25 Time of Possession 32:35
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 25-102, Hoge 3-8, O'Donnell 3-(-4), Thompson 2-(-7)
Bengals---H.Green 16-116, Klingler 8-44, Ball 1-0
PASSING:
STEELERS--O'Donnell 10-18 1 INT 149 yds
Bengals---Klingler 16-34 0 Int 140 yds
RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Graham 5-60, Stone 2-33, Davenport 1-31, Foster 1-16, Hoge 1-9
Bengals---Query 5-49, Thompson 5-40, Pickens 4-34, Holman 2-17.
Jake
|
35.821 | Like to see the New up and coming teams :-) | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 30 1992 14:31 | 12 |
| Someone made a comment about Defense Wins Championships !!!! Well low
and Behold the Steelers have only allowed 162 pts, a mere 13pts per
game, not bad for no D, now lets look at the Mighty Bills D, 37 more
with 199 or 16pts per game, not a BIG Difference, but 3 pts is about
the difference between beating Indy or losing to them :-)
GO Steelers, it doesnt look good for the Raiders or the colts so Ill
be rooting for the Steelers or San Diego to come on strong down the
stretch, let send Buffalo, Miami and Denver home Early on in the
Playoffs....
MaB
|
35.822 | Go SEACHICKENS!!!!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dontcha miss Charlie's Angels reruns? | Mon Nov 30 1992 14:36 | 10 |
|
> GO Steelers, it doesnt look good for the Raiders or the colts so Ill
> be rooting for the Steelers or San Diego to come on strong down the
> stretch, let send Buffalo, Miami and Denver home Early on in the
> Playoffs....
let's not send Denver at all!!!!!!!!!!!!
mike
|
35.823 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 30 1992 15:26 | 16 |
| I've only seen 2 or 3 complete Steeler games this year. But I've seen a lot
of highlight's on ESPN's NFL primetime. Foster certainly looks like a
great back but when I watch all of those highlight's, I see a lot of the
defenders being knocked over by the Steeler offensive linemen. Last year,
the Steeler offensive line was one of the weakest in the NFL. It still
isn't a great offensive line but it is one of the better offensive lines
in the AFC. Duval Love was a Plan B steal. Hat's off to Cowher and company
for turning a weakness into an asset.
The Steeler's have an excellent chance to get home field advantage
throughout the playoffs. 3 of their last 4 games are at home against
average to poor teams. It would be very hard for them to beat the Bills
in Buffalo, but in 3 Rivers Stadium, Jim Kelly and company don't have to
like it.
Keith
|
35.824 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Nov 30 1992 17:22 | 23 |
|
Although I've only seen a couple of games and I'm still a steeler
fan, this fan still remains skeptical about this present version of
the Steelers.
Why? Simply because the Steelers have had a real easy schedule.
Because of their poor finish last year, that enabled them to play more
sub .500 teams than say a Buffalo.
I don't have the figures handy, but I'd like to see how many .500+
teams the Steelers have played this year based upon last years final
results and compare that with some of the other division leaders or
wild card hopefuls.
Mind you, this in no way takes away from a fine year they have had,
but I'm also looking at the strength of schedules too. The Steelers
have a shot, a real shot with basically a no-name team. My only wish
is that I had more of a chance to see them on the tube!
bill..g.
|
35.825 | STEELERS UNOFFICIAL Cumulative stats, 9-3 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Mon Nov 30 1992 18:23 | 83 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 44 71 48 84 247
Opponent 30 66 35 31 162
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 20 25 85
Foster 9 0 0 54
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
E.Mills 2 0 0 12
Davenport 1 0 0 6
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 6
Jorden 1 0 0 6
Thompson 1 0 0 6
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Opponents
220 First Downs 201
405-1719 Rushes/yds 298-1226
2145 Passing Yds 2299
188-324-7 Comp-Att-Int 208-391-20
25-203 Sacked/yds lost 27-184
19-15 Fumbles-lost 25-15
78-674 Penalties-yards 86-650
32:18 Time of Possession 27:42
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 296 1318 4.45
Hoge 38 145 3.82
Thompson 30 128 4.27
Stone 9 101 10.50
Mills 1 20 20.00
Brister 4 2 0.50
O'Donnell 25 7 0.28
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 405 1721 4.25
PASSING:
Att Compl Int Comp % yd/comp Yds TD
O'Donnell 296 175 6 59.1 12.46 2180 12
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44.00 44 0
Brister 26 12 1 50.0 10.33 124 1
Foster 1 0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 324 188 7 58.0 12.49 2348 13
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 40 607 15.2
Foster 25 248 9.9
Stone 24 392 16.3
Mills 23 277 12.7
Hoge 22 166 7.5
E.Green 14 152 10.9
Cooper 12 119 9.9
Thompson 12 138 12.2
Davenport 8 129 16.1
Didio 3 39 13.0
Jorden 3 15 5.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
------------------------------------
TOTAL 188 2326 12.4
JaKe
|
35.826 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Fri Dec 04 1992 15:37 | 4 |
| Barry Foster was named AFC Offensive player of the Month for November.
JaKe
|
35.827 | OH MY GAWD, IT'S BUBBY BALL (8^(* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Sun Dec 06 1992 16:36 | 17 |
| STEELERS win * U G L Y *, over the Seachickens, 20-14, but lost Neil
O'Donnell INDEFINITELY with a cracked tibula in the right leg. I'll
put more in here on this when I get wind of it.
Barry Foster ran for his 10th 100 yd of this year, leaving him 2 shy of
Eric Dickerson's(Football's answer to Barry Bonds) record of 12 in a
season. Foster and the STEELERS have 3 games to go.
The best thing to come out of today is that the Jests beat the Bills,
leaving the STEELERS with the best record in the AFC, and on top of the
AFC Central. The STEELERS only need to win 1 of their remaining 3
games to clinch the AFC Central title. Having the best record, should
they win their remaining 3 games, would give them homefield throughout
the playoffs.
JaKe
|
35.828 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Dec 07 1992 07:54 | 5 |
| And as Terry Bradshaw said late yesterday, "Woe to the teams that come
into Three Rivers when there is playoff fever in the air"....
'Saw
|
35.829 | Not thrilled by the prospect of Bubby Ball | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to the old grind | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:29 | 23 |
| The word here in Pittsburgh is that O'Donnell is out fer "ABOUT" six
weeks. And it's a cracked fibula.
The Steelers are 138-42 in Three Rivers Stadium.
Brister continued to sail the ball in yesterday's close call, he's
sailed his passes throughout the games he's played this year.
O'Donnell had 6 interceptions coming into this game, and before leaving
with the broken leg, he threw three in the game, in fact, he completed
his firsted attempt, then threw 3 consecutive interceptions. The only
good to come from that was Seattle's inept offense converted NONE of
those turnovers into points, even though two of them left the
Seachickens deep in Steeler territory.
How long before Seattle waives that place kicker and signs somebody
new??
Are the Steelers DOOMED by the impending return of "Bubby Ball" or will
the best thing he does be handing the ball to Barry Foster??
JaKe
|
35.830 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:41 | 8 |
| > Are the Steelers DOOMED by the impending return of "Bubby Ball" or will
> the best thing he does be handing the ball to Barry Foster??
It could be the end of the Steelers season. Then again, who knows....
'Saw
|
35.831 | If the Giants won with Hostetler, the Steelers have a chance | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 07 1992 10:10 | 12 |
|
The end? I don't think so. *If* (a big if, I'll admit), Brister can
avoid making big mistakes, the Steelers aren't a much different team
than with O'Donnell in there. The Steelers aren't relying on their
quarterback to make many plays, less so than any other winning team
than football, as a matter of fact. They do need to hold onto that
homefield advantage, though, where playing in Pittsburgh (the worse the
weather, the better) can allow them to win games on the strengh of their
running game and defense...
glenn
|
35.832 | Who's next? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Dec 07 1992 10:25 | 6 |
| What is the Steeler's remaining schedule? Please include where they
play, also.
Thanks,
Jerry
|
35.833 | BTW, STEELERS first in AFC to clinch playoffs berth | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to the old grind | Mon Dec 07 1992 12:59 | 6 |
| Nexted week, they play the Bear in Chicago, then they play the Vikings
in Pittsburgh, and they close the regular season out in Pittsburgh
against the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm).
JaKe
|
35.834 | Squeelers No 1 ??????? NOT! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:01 | 6 |
|
Looks like a 0 - 3 showing...maybe 1 - 2 at best!
WOOF!
|
35.835 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to the old grind | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:05 | 8 |
| Hey Hal, 1-2 gets them their first AFC Central title since 1983 and I'm
sure we'll take it.
The 'Spots will sip Lake Erie Scum water and finish out 2-1 at best,
fer sure.
JaKe
|
35.836 | STEELERS 10-3, best record in AFC | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to the old grind | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:05 | 42 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
Seattle 0 7 7 0 14
STEELERS 7 3 0 10 20
SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Mills 19 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 38 yd
Seattle---Kane 28 yd pas from Gelbaugh(Kasay PAT)
Seattle---J.L.Williams 3 yd pass from Gelbaugh(Kasay PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 4 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 39 yd
TEAM STATS:
Seattle STEELERS
10 1st Downs 16
22-67 Rushes-Yds 37-138
153 Passing Yds 168
13-28-1 Compl-Att-Int 16-29-5
3-26 Sacked-Yds lost 2-5
4-40 Punts 3-46
4-1 Fumbles-Lost 3-0
6-59 Penalties-Yds 7-50
23:57 Time of Possession 36:03
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Seattle---Warren 14-43, Gelbaugh 3-16, Blades 1-5, J.L.Williams 4-3
STEELERS--Foster 33-125, Stone 1-7, Brister 2-6, O'Donnell 1-0
PASSING:
Seattle---Gelbaugh 13-28 1 Int 2 TD's, 179 yds
STEELERS--O'Donnell 10-17 3 Int's 1 TD 104 yds, Brister 6-12 2 Int's 69 yds
RECEIVING:
Seattle---J.L.Williams 8-98, Kane 2-40, Blades 2-40, Heller 1-1
STEELERS--Foster 5-29, Stone 3-44, Thompson 3-41, Graham 2-30, Hoge 2-10
Mills 1-19
JaKe
|
35.838 | Steelers leading the pack | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:02 | 17 |
| JD,
This comes back to the earlier discussion of exactly who is going to
represent the AFC in the Super Bowl. It seems that about everyone at the
top except for Pittsburgh - and possibly San Diego - is working hard at
losing now and avoiding the playoffs. Buffalo has to be the most pathetic
since they're doing everything they can to keep the rest of the pack in
the hunt. The AFC West is folding fast. San Diego looks like they're
trying hard to win it.
So looking at the record it looks like Pittsburgh is the team to beat and
they're still winning.
As soon as the AFC decides if they're going to show up this year we can
probably pencil them in for another Super Loss.
TTom
|
35.840 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:42 | 35 |
| The only thing lacking with the 'Boys is they are one weapon short.
If you can shut down Irvan and Smith, then you've shut them down, period.
That's a lot to try and do, but if a rejuvenated Buffalo could do it,
then it might be an interesting Super Bowl matchup.
If it were not for this losing streak that Buffalo is on, I would rank
the teams (in echelon) as follows:
San Fran Buffalo
---------------- ----------------
Dallas Pittsburgh
--------------- ----------------
N.O. Denver
Phil KC
Wash Miami
--------------- ----------------
all the rest all the rest
No order is implied within a level. And obviously, it's open to much
interpretaion, in fact, I might almost put Miami in with Pittsburgh
if they had a better o-line....
Just an opinion of the moment....
'Saw
PS I bet San Fran takes it all......
|
35.841 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:51 | 1 |
| Novacek's not a bad receiver...
|
35.842 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Mon Dec 07 1992 15:16 | 10 |
|
Saw, Though I do agree with ya about SF takin it all I also think your
ranking Miami and Denver a bit high. I believe both SD and Cleveland
have got a better team than the previous 2 I mentioned.
Even Though Kosar will find a way to blow it down the wire and
Clevelands Defensive stand the past 4-5 weeks will all be for not.
Chappy.
|
35.844 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 15:45 | 43 |
| Not to denigrate Jake, but if the Steelers are the
best team in the AFC, then AFC fans can expect, barring
a miracle, another loss in the Super Bowl.
>>The Steelers have a nice team. But I wouldn't be
>>putting them in da BOWL yet...
>>Not to denigrate Jake, but if the Steelers are the
>>best team in the AFC, then AFC fans can expect, barring
>>a miracle, another loss in the Super Bowl.
>>The Steelers have a nice team. But I wouldn't be
>>putting them in da BOWL yet...
JD, see below
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 35.836 PITTSBURGH STEELERS 836 of 843
PFSVAX::JACOB "Back to the old grind" 42 lines 7-DEC-1992 13:05
-< STEELERS 10-3, best record in AFC >-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I didn't even think of implying that by having the best record, the
STEELERS are the best team in the AFC. The STEELERS have come a long
way from lasted year's 7-9 finish, but they have a long way to go
before they even come close to the likes of Buffalo and even KC.
Unlike some fan of another AFC CENTRAL team, that sees the world thru
BROWN glasses, and gets his thought jumbled that his team has
re-arrived at playoff football, It would suprise me greatly if this
STEELER team was to make it through the playoffs, although anything's
possible, especially if they get home field advantage throughout the
playoffs, and it's cold and snowy, etc.
They've won the games this year that they lost in the recent past years
and made them a losing team. They played Buffalo tight, and have yet
to be blown out. The defense is opportunistic, but the offense is
riding a roller coaster that, in the lasted three weeks, is having
trouble getting back to the top of the big hill.
JaKe
|
35.845 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:01 | 7 |
| I take it that yesterdays sqeelr/seachick game was as bad as last
mondays donk/seachick game?
Alot of turnovers and possible turnovers. Maybe seattle just has a
nack of making people look bad?
Tim
|
35.846 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:18 | 2 |
| No, that was the Colts/Pats game. I had a chance to go for free
and still am glad I didn't go...
|
35.847 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:34 | 45 |
|
>> <<< Note 35.845 by QUASER::JACKSONTA "The QB shuffle stinks" >>>
>> I take it that yesterdays sqeelr/seachick game was as bad as last
>>mondays donk/seachick game?
>> Alot of turnovers and possible turnovers. Maybe seattle just has a
>>nack of making people look bad?
You got it, Tim.
The Steelers, after turning the ball over on their first three
possessions, all of which resulted in 2 missed field goals fer the
SeaChickens, finally got out in front 10-0, only to allow Seattle to
put together two drives and make the score 14-10, Seattle.
With 2:20 left, Barry Foster capped a 13 play, 80 yard drive with a 4
yard run, putting the Steelers up 17-14. Seattle failed to get a
firsted down on the next possession, and the STEELERS ran three up the
middle and kicked a FG to seal it at 20-14.
O'Donnell opened up the game with a completion to Hoge, and then
proceeded to throw three consecutive interceptions, one a bad pass that
just took a little too long getting to the reciever, letting the DB
step in front and pick it off, the next, a pass that bounced out of the
hand of the intended receiver and up into the air, making it easy
pickings fer the defense, and the third, a throw just out of the reach
of Jeff Graham and into the arms of the DB.
Brister also had two "classic Brister" interceptions, right into the
hands of the defense, making it a grand total of 5 ints fer the day,
this from an offense that had only thrown 7 interceptions for the first
12 games.
Foster had 125 yards on 33 carries, but had no run longer than 12 yards
in the game.
I sure hope the offense shows up, even though O'donnell won't be
running it, nexted week in Chicago, and hope the defense continues to
play the "bend but not break" defense that has them ranked 2nd in the
league in least points allowed, with New Orleans being the only team
that's allowed fewer points.
JaKe
|
35.848 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:37 | 11 |
| > pencil in a loss
> chalk up another loss for the AFC
> etc.
The last time we heard things like this about a Steeler playoff team
was in 1974 when the winner of the Raider/Dolphin playoff game was
supposed to be the sure fire winner of the Superbowl.
Shall we say the rest is history.
Keith
|
35.849 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:52 | 29 |
|
re: -1
yea, but the Steelers of '74 had an awesome defense along with
a crushing running game. They had the O weapons and had plenty to
go around on D. The curtain was rising! This edition worries me on
defense. To many gambles and no rush without sending the corners.
Add to that a questionable offense i.e. Foster right, Foster left,
Foster up the middle, and the Steelers could be stopped rather easily.
The main issue now and in the nexted few weeks is which team is
peaking! The Bills seemed to have peaked early in the season along
with the Dolphins and Steelers. Over in the NFC, the same could be
said for Philly.
Going into the playoffs, a team should be peaking and not past its
peak.
Either way, I still say the Steelers have had it easy schedule wise
and this could really show come playoff time. Although the '9ers and
Cowboys look good right now, this is a pretty open playoff with no real
clear cut 'heavies'.
But, if the Steelers do manage to make it to the AFC Championship,
it will be a real Cinderella story that's fer shere!
bill..g.
|
35.850 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:59 | 4 |
| IMHO, Bill Cowher already has AFC Coach of the Year wrapped up.
JaKe
|
35.851 | IMOHO | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Mon Dec 07 1992 17:02 | 5 |
|
Should only be 2 contenders Him and Bobby Ross.
Unless Hal wants to nominate Belicek :-).
|
35.852 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 07 1992 17:46 | 27 |
| Yea, Bill, I agree with you. It's hard to see the Steeler's going to
the Big Dance and winning it, especially with Bubble Ball, who pitches
wiffle balls, at the healm.
But... I felt the same way back in 74. Yea, the Steeler's don't have
a great offense like Miami or Oakland. Bradshaw still can't spell C A T.
The Black and Gold defense will play good and keep them in the game but
they'll be out matched by the multi dimensional attacks of the Raiders or
the Dolphins. In 74, everybody knew the Steelers had a good defense, they
just didn't know how good. The rest of the 70's proved they had one of the
all time great defenses. The offense hadn't arrived yet even though the
future stars were on the team.
The optimistic side of me says that the defense can play inspired ball,
especially the secondary where they are capable of making big plays.
Recently, the defensive line has looked much improved over previous years.
Barry Foster and a few well timed passes could carry them a long way.
And, as someone pointed out a few replies back, woe to any team who comes
to 3 rivers stadium when playoff fever is in the air. When it's cold outside
and the snow flakes are flying and 60,000 fans are yellin DEFENSE, DEFENSE,
a lot of good teams could find themselves packin back to their home
towns wondering what hit em.
Here's hopin Bubble Baby plays the best ball of his life the rest of
the season.
Keith
|
35.853 | STEELERS UNofficial Stats thru 13 games(10-3) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 17:51 | 85 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 51 74 48 94 267
Opponent 30 73 42 31 176
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 22 27 93
Foster 10 0 0 60
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Mills 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
Davenport 1 0 0 6
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 6
Jorden 1 0 0 6
Thompson 1 0 0 6
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Opponents
236 First Downs 211
442-1859 Rushes/yds 320-1293
2313 Passing Yds 2452
204-363-12 Comp-Att-Int 221-419-21
27-208 Sacked/yds lost 30-210
22-15 Fumbles-lost 29-16
85-724 Penalties-yards 92-709
32:35 Time of Possession 27:25
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 329 1443 4.39
Hoge 38 145 3.82
Thompson 30 128 4.27
Stone 10 108 10.80
Mills 1 20 20.00
Brister 6 8 1.33
O'Donnell 26 7 0.27
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 442 1859 4.21
PASSING:
Att Comp Int % Avg/com Yds TD Int %
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O'Donnell 313 185 9 59.1 12.35 2284 13 2.9
Brister 38 18 3 50.0 10.33 193 1 7.9
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44.00 44 0 0.0
Foster 1 0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 353 204 12 57.8 12.36 2521 14 3.4
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 42 637 15.2
Foster 30 277 9.2
Stone 27 436 16.1
Mills 24 296 12.3
Hoge 23 176 7.3
Thompson 15 179 11.9
E.Green 14 152 10.9
Cooper 12 119 9.9
Davenport 8 129 16.1
Didio 3 39 13.0
Jorden 3 15 5.0
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
------------------------------------
TOTAL 204 2521 12.4
JaKe
|
35.854 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | it's a great day for hockey! | Mon Dec 07 1992 20:25 | 10 |
|
The deservedly much-maligned Brister did have a great game in the
playoffs against Denver a few years back. Stillers should have won
that one.
There's still a dent in my coffee table from a beer bottle flung in
anger during that game.
Charlie
|
35.855 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 23:05 | 11 |
|
>>There's still a dent in my coffee table from a beer bottle flung in
>>anger during that game.
Now I hope it was an empty beer bottle, it'd be a miserable waste of a
good beer if it was full.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
35.856 | | MKFSA::LONG | choosy drinkers choose Jif | Tue Dec 08 1992 08:14 | 3 |
| Does anyone know when (if) Eric Green is due back?
Bill
|
35.857 | | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | Drink Canada Dry....I'm trying | Tue Dec 08 1992 08:52 | 5 |
| I heard last night that the reports on Neil O's injury are not as bad
as first feared. The bone broken is a non-weight bearing bone and he
is expected back in about 2 weeks.
pete
|
35.858 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Tue Dec 08 1992 15:37 | 10 |
| A.) Eric Green is eligible to play again the last regular season game
this year.
B.) re.857, TRUE. It was stated here today the O'Donnell will be
allowed to return to running and practicing as soon as the discomfort
eases. The bone is indeed, non-weight bearing and O'Donnell is said to
be slated to return for the Clevescum game.
JaKe
|
35.859 | Browns 2 - Squeelers 0 | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | | Wed Dec 09 1992 07:59 | 8 |
|
Sounds like the Squeelers are worried about losing the game on the
27th.
I keep reading in the newspaper and on the radio that the Browns
are said to have the best chance at beating the Squeelers at home!
WOOF!
|
35.860 | Reading on the radio? Must be braille | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Wed Dec 09 1992 08:03 | 0 |
35.861 | Just more whooffing | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:10 | 7 |
| >Reading on the radio? Must be braille
Hal has also been known to aquire his indisputable knowledge of
pro football from such things as strange voices while he's dreaming,
oiuji boards and dogs barking.
Keith
|
35.862 | HE IS BACK! | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:59 | 11 |
|
Funny you should mention that dream Keith...I was thinking about
it myself the other day. Since that night, a new feeling has come
over me....a sence of something insperational, something that says
Bernie will do it. He told me he was ready....I swear it was real.
It will probably be the closest I'll ever get to the hero of the
Browns..... Bernie Kosar - QB - CLEVELAND BROWNS - #1
WOOF!
|
35.863 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Wed Dec 09 1992 13:26 | 1 |
| I thought the hero of the browns was/is Jim Brown?
|
35.864 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Wed Dec 09 1992 13:43 | 5 |
|
Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
how to handle people who wear dresses.
Brews
|
35.865 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Dec 09 1992 14:07 | 8 |
| > Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
> how to handle people who wear dresses.
Some of the BEST football footage I have EVER seen is footage of
Jim Brown and Sam Huff going head to head. Unbelievable....
'Saw
|
35.866 | ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:05 | 12 |
|
>> Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
>> how to handle people who wear dresses.
>
> Some of the BEST football footage I have EVER seen is footage of
> Jim Brown and Sam Huff going head to head. Unbelievable....
Sam Huff wore a dress? That was my opinion, but I didn't expect to
hear it from a Giants' fan...
glenn
|
35.867 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:24 | 11 |
| > Sam Huff wore a dress? That was my opinion, but I didn't expect to
> hear it from a Giants' fan...
Huff was one of the all-time GREATEST LBs ever to play the game, and the
GREATEST in the era before Nitschke and Butkus.
Huff ALWAYS manhandled Brown....
;^)
|
35.869 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:35 | 14 |
| HAL,
just what recreational Pharmaceuticals ARE you doin'???????????
STEELERS worried about the mistakes from the lake??? HAHAHAHAHA,
thanks fer the funny, HAL.
Bernice hates Three Rivers cause his high heels keep breaking off here.
Just who is saying that the 'Spots have a chance in Pittsburgh????
SOmeone who don't know sh_t, that's who.
JaKe
|
35.871 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:43 | 11 |
| NO, but I've been remiss today.
For like the millionth time, let's cut the baloney about Bernie Kosar
wearing a dress, high heels or whatever.....
Okay? Okay.
'Saw
|
35.874 | respect...Kosar, Kelly, Marino, Elway, Young... | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:51 | 11 |
|
It doesn't hurt me in any way when you all want to tease about
Bernie...it just shows how much you would really want him on your
team. I can take it and I'm sure he can too.
I have alot of respect for Moon but anyone from Squeelers
contry has got to prove himself first before I'll give him any
credit.
WOOF!
|
35.875 | | MKFSA::LONG | choosy drinkers choose Jif | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:57 | 4 |
| I'm certain that getting Hal's respect is right at the top of
Neil O'Donnell's Christmas list.
Bill
|
35.876 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Wed Dec 09 1992 16:01 | 4 |
| Hey HAL, whaddya think of Barry Foster?????????
JaKe
|
35.877 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Thu Dec 10 1992 10:47 | 7 |
| Whadda day here in the 'Burgh.
3 inches of snow on the ground, and 9-12 more forecast. Looks like it
could be an interesting night if'n I cain make it in later.
JaKe
|
35.878 | Thanks in advance | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 10 1992 14:01 | 1 |
| Was Neil ever put on IR officialy ???? FFL NEEDS TO KNOW.
|
35.879 | 6 inches and still falling | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Thu Dec 10 1992 15:21 | 4 |
| Neil O'Donnell is NOT on IR, nor will he be put on it.
JaKe
|
35.880 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Thu Dec 10 1992 18:16 | 6 |
| >PFSVAX::JACOB "PC is not fer ME" 4 lines 10-DEC-1992 15:21
> -< 6 inches and still falling >-
My condolences to Mrs. Jake.
Brews
|
35.881 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Dec 10 1992 22:21 | 6 |
| Brews,
As a mod you should be hiding notes like .880, not writing them :-)
The Crazy Met
|
35.882 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Fri Dec 11 1992 00:12 | 5 |
| Well, we're up to 11-1/2 inches now and still piling up. Forecast is
16-24 inches before the end comes about.
JaKe
|
35.883 | Bubby's busted | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:43 | 5 |
| After yesterday's game, it looks like the Steelers are a much different
team with O'Donell out of the lineup. I think the Steeler's need to look
for a QB in the upcoming draft.
Keith
|
35.884 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:57 | 15 |
| Two words sum up the STEELERS loss to the Bears yesterday:
Bubby
Brister!!!
The STEELERS, who, to quote BIll Cowher, had "Won ugly" the pasted 4
games, lost VERY ugly to the Bears yesterday. The Bears were playing
with tons of emotion, since it was Mike Singletary's last home game,
but the Steelers should have keelt the Bears.
Stats and stuff later
JaKe
|
35.885 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:59 | 6 |
|
I read yesterday that the Bears had never lost at home to a team whose
city's name began with the letter "P." Included Pitts, Philly, and one
other from the old NFL days (Pottstown?).
Brews
|
35.886 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Dec 14 1992 12:51 | 47 |
|
All I can say is, a huge storm hits here in NE and by a miracle,
a local station carried the game and spared me of watching the Jets
and Colts. Biggo mistake.
For only about the second time this year, I was treated to a
Steeler game on TV. As I have said before, the Steelers have failed
to deliever against even .500 teams and yesterday was no different.
Jake, although Bubby stunk really bad, he had nothing to do with
the Bears crossing the goal line. The Steeler D played fairly well
at times and sipped for most of the game with a team that has no
offense at all. Sound familiar?
I was amused though at the taunting the Steelers managed to do
while getting their collective butts kicked. Nothing better than
seeing a bunch of taunters that can't back it up. If this is what I've
been missing for the last 12 weeks, I'm glad I didn't waste any Sunday
afternoons watching these guys try to imitate a intimidating defense.
I think they did manage to scare or intimidate a couple of small
children in the stands though. Really classless. At least when Joe
Greene got tossed, he did some tossing, but Nickerson?
Overall, I can't figure why the Steelers gave up so quickly on the
run. Also, they had decent success over the middle passing the ball
but then continued to throw the out patterns that require a great arm
and excellent timing...something that Brister doesn't have. Then,
if Bubby wasn't bouncing the balls or throwing them 10 feet over the
recievers heads, the ends were dropping them! Bubby has got to go.
Pay the guys salary and send this moron packing!
It really is amazing that a team as inept as this one appeared to
be yesterday could have 10 wins. They have absolutely no offense once
Foster is stopped. Their defense is real suspect if you can handle the
stunts. Shoot, they actually made the Bears look good yesterday and
the Bears had lost 6 straight!
Amazing what it can do for you to have a schedule that is made up
of sub .500 teams to play.
And in spite of this exercise some would call football, I am still
and always be a Steeler fan. But somehow I doubt that the Steelers
will go very far come playoff time.
bill..g.
|
35.887 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Mon Dec 14 1992 13:11 | 7 |
| Rod Woodson quote about the game:
"why be worried. You act like it's the Super Bowl.."
WOODSON set the tone for the game, fumbling the opening kickoff...
JD
|
35.888 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Dec 14 1992 13:21 | 8 |
| I think WVIT-TV30 (who carried the game) lets the fans vote on which
telecast to carry.
22 in Springfield had the Pats, and by rights, 30 would have had the Jets.
But, I guess the fans wanted to see the Steelers....
'Saw
|
35.889 | bubby suks... | DECWET::METZGER | This space being flea bombed.. | Mon Dec 14 1992 15:21 | 18 |
|
Bubby bites the big one...I can't believe Parcells was saying the recievers
should have come up with a bunch of those balls. Bubble was hanging his receivers
out to dry with his high passes that required a full extension to approach..while
the db is just waiting to undercut the recievers going up for the pass....
If I was a WR in that game I wouldda told bubble to throw the ball to hisself
next play...I'm surprised the steelers didn't lose a few wr's permanently
during that game...
Do ya think his mom was proud of him in the stands watching him lead the team to
defeat? If O'Donnell was in that game the steelers would have won. It was
mightly easy for the bears to shut down the run after they realized that bubble
couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. That's why the coaches had to resort to
sideline patterns. at least when he missed high the ball would only sail into the
stands not into some db's arms waiting down field...
Metz
|
35.890 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Mon Dec 14 1992 15:57 | 26 |
| Brews, the STEELERS are 0-11 in Chicago dating back to 1934.
>> Jake, although Bubby stunk really bad, he had nothing to do with
>>the Bears crossing the goal line. The Steeler D played fairly well
>>at times and sipped for most of the game with a team that has no
>>offense at all. Sound familiar?
You put the defense on the field fer as long as they were yesterday,
with the STEELERS doing multiple "3 and outs", and eventually, you're
going to give up some drives.The defense gave up two long drives, one
of 77 yards, and the other of 80 yards. Basically, it was a team
effort to lose this bad, but Bubby headed it.
Brister made Cowher's decision to go with O'Donnell as the #1 QB look
as good as it ever has. This game looked like vintage Brister-type
play.
Brister sucked, as usual, plus they DID have a lot of dropped passes.
Hail, the recievers had more balls go throught their hands than an Army
doctor in the enlistment center does on a busy day.
I didn't see all of the game, and what I did made me want to puke.
Nickerson's tirades were uncalled fer.
JaKe
|
35.891 | A Ballet Of Bubby Bungles | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 14 1992 16:20 | 7 |
| Bubble Butt Bubby Bombed out Big against the Big Bad Bears. His Bumbled
Bombs couldn't hit the Broad side of a Barn(well, maybe the top) and left
his receivers Bruised, Broken, Black and Blue.
nuf said,
Keith
|
35.892 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Dec 15 1992 12:40 | 38 |
|
re: jake
yea but remember those glory days especially in '76. In that
case and many others, the defense rose on occasion after occasion to
shut down the other team even though the offense was basically 3
and out for much of the stretch when Bradshaw was hurt. On Sunday,
the defense could of risen and proved itself that indeed it is one
of the best in the AFC, but they fell flat. They couldn't muster
a turnover which frankly has me wondering if the Steelers can win
without the defense getting the ball in the endzone or a simple INT.
Especially yesterday too with the Bears. Very average team with a
below average offense yet they controlled the ball for most of the
game.
I really feel sorry for some of the Steeler faithful because they
have been given a team doing it with mirrors. They have only a
slightly better than average QB and absolutely no backup. They don't
have a really decent wideout and especially one that has proven he can
come up with a catch in traffic. They have a decent RB, and they have
a decent pair of TE's if they would only throw the ball to more than
2 times a game. Come playoff time, folks are going to see what a
sub-par .500 schedule gets you. I would of rather seen the Steelers
stink a little more this year and get another good draft pick to build
upon, but then again, the way they have managed their previous picks,
they don't need a first round pick.
Now instead of building some steam going into the playoffs, they
have to deal with Bubby running the show. Next two games will be
tough especially since both of the remaining teams are looking for
playoff berths and will need a win.
I'll also be curious to see how Mike Merriweather plays coming back
to the the 'burg after his less then cordial leave from the Steelers.
bill..g
|
35.893 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Denver's QB Shuffle = Curly Shuffle | Tue Dec 15 1992 15:49 | 30 |
|
bill..g
I agree with ya fer the mosted part. The defense has played very well
at times. Sunday they played well, but gave up the long drives.
The Steeler defenses in the '70s, though, particularly 1976, was an
established defense. The defense this year HAS at times, got it done
with smoke and mirrors, while at other times, played VERY well. They
are playing a new defensive system from last year, and I think they've
done decent overall. They rose to the occasion in KC, came back and
played a good second half in Buffalo, and played well enuf to give the
offense the ball and make the comebacks against the Oileers, twice.
IMHO, the game Sunday, especially the 4th qtr, looked like the games
lasted year where they just cain't get up the energy to stop the
opposing offense, cause they've spent almost 2/3 of the game on the
field already.
I don't expect the team to go very far in the playoffs, unless
O'Donnell returns and is in the form he was in for most of the first 9
games of the season. Brister doesn't have the filberts to carry this
team thru a game against a good defense.
IMHO, the Bears could've beat almost anyone Sunday, with it being Mike
Singletary's lasted game in Chitown. It just coincided with the
Steelers being there, unfortunately.
JaKe
|
35.894 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 15 1992 15:56 | 2 |
| Which year was it that Bradshaw was injured and the Steelers defense "threw"
4 shutouts in 5 games or something like that.
|
35.895 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Denver's QB Shuffle = Curly Shuffle | Tue Dec 15 1992 15:59 | 4 |
| I think that was 1976.
JaKe
|
35.896 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Denver's QB Shuffle = Curly Shuffle | Tue Dec 15 1992 16:20 | 16 |
| Now, my memory is a little bit fuzzy, and John Hendry ain't here
anymore, so I gots a couple of questions fer younze.
What was the lasted year that Bradshaw played???Was it 1984???
If so, was that the last time, before this year that the Steelers won
the AFC Central??
That was the year that Cliff Stoudt took them to 8-1, on the strengths
of the defense and the running game, and then proceeded to throw bounce
pass after bounce pass, and interceptions until Bradshaw came back for
1 half of football versus the Jets and threw his last two TD passes,
lifting the team to a victory and the playoffs, where they lost.
JaKe
|
35.897 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Dec 15 1992 16:29 | 44 |
|
re: defense
It was '76 and many including myself believe this unit was the
greatest defensive unit to ever suit up. That year they also set a
record for fewest points allowed while Franco and Rocky both eclipsed
the 1000 yard barrier. But despite this incredible showing, Franco and
Blier were hurt in the first playoff game (I believe) and the Steelers
had to face Oakland in the AFC Championship in Oakland. Even with
Bradshaw back, without their main offensive weapons, they were toast
for the soon-to-be crowned Superbowl camps the Oakland Raiders.
Here's the breakdown of their schedule in '76.
game 1: at Oakland Oakland 31 Steelers 28 Oakland
scores 17 points in last 3 minutes
of 4th quarter off turnovers.
game 2: at Pitt Steelers 31 Cleveland 14
game 3: at Pitt Patriots 30 Steelers 27 Steeler
blow 20-9 lead with 6 fumbles in
1st half.
game 4: at Minny Minny 17 Steelers 6
game 5: at Clev. Browns 18 Steelers 16, Bradshaw
hurt.
game 6: at Pitt Pitt 23 Cincy 6
game 7: at NY giants Pitt 27 Giants 0
game 8: at Pitt Pitt 23 Chargers 0
game 9: at KC Pitt 45 Chiefs 0
game 10: at Pitt Pitt 14 Miami 3
game 11: at Pitt Pitt 32 Oilers 16
game 12: at Cincy Pitt 7 Cincy 3
game 13: at Pitt Pitt 42 Bucs 0
game 14 at Oilers Pitt 21 Oilers 0
Playoffs: at Colts Pitt 40 Colts 14 Franco and
Blier hurt. Bradshaw complets 78%
of his attempts.
at Oakland Oakland 24 Steelers 7 although
Steeler D held Oakland to only 220
total yards.
bill..g.
|
35.898 | Hoping they get a REAL wide receiver | PFSVAX::JACOB | Denver's QB Shuffle = Curly Shuffle | Tue Dec 15 1992 16:37 | 10 |
| I just hope that come draft time nexted year, the Steelers make a deal
or two and move up in the draft and get themselves a receiver who cain
hang onto the ball when it's put in his breadbasket.
Also, they have to find a receiver who cain be a true deep threat. The
Steelers longest completion of the year is only 51 yards, that coming
on an alley-ooop play in the second game of the year.
JaKe
|
35.899 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 15 1992 17:18 | 9 |
| '76 was really an incredible performance as reflected in .897. Thanks
fer postin it.
Another incredible stat that most people don't remember is that during one
of their superbowl years (maybe 1975), the combined rushing yardage against
the Steelers in all post season games was less than 100 yards and one of
the teams they beat had the Juice playin for em.
Keith
|
35.900 | got it! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Dec 15 1992 21:03 | 14 |
|
Yabbut 2 years later I got (honorably) discharged when I completed
my enlistment! THAT YEAR WAS THE GREATEST!
I had to say that, I wanted #.900
;^)
we now resume to out regularly schedule spit swap
I remain,
gladly a civilian!
Kev
|
35.901 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Dec 16 1992 12:39 | 48 |
|
re: -2
O.K. I'm looking it up.
'72 was the first Steeler playoff year. They beat Oakland and then
lost to Miami (mainly on that fake punt) in the AFC final.
'73 they were bounced in the first game at Oakland but only gave up
65 rushing yards.
'74 they bet the Bills in round one and then Oakland in the AFC
final. They gave up 100 yards to the Bills (OJ was 15-49), 29 to
Oakland and then in the Superbowl, 17 to the Vikes. So the total
rushing yards was 146 on 62 attempts in 3 games...not bad!
'75 they beat the Colts and then Oakland and then Dallas. Total
rushing yards for each game: 82, 93, 108.
'76 they beat the Colts and then lost to Oakland. Total rushing
yards for each game: 71, 157.
'77 they lost to the Broncos in round one. Rushing yards allowed,
103.
'78 they beat Denver, beat Houston, beat Dallas. Rushing yards
allowed each game: 87, 72, 141.
'79 they beat Miami, Houston, and LA Rams. Rushing yards allowed
each game: 25, 24, 107. Total rushing yards was 156 on 73 attempts!!
So, '74 and '79 were the best years at stopping the rush. Geez,
in '79 during the first two games, the average per carry was 1.1!!
Unbelievable!! Campbell had 17 attempts for 15 yards in the '79
playoff game! Talk about shutting someone down! In the previous
years playoff, he didn't do much better gaining only 62 yards on 22
attempts.
Hey, I have the stats for any game the steelers played during the
'70's, so if you have a question about any of those games, just post
it here and I'll get you the answer if it is in the stats. Hey, the
book was one of those your Mom orders that at the time is kindof stupid
but now some 10+ years latter it is pretty neat to have around!! I
guess that's what Mom's are for!
bill..g.
|
35.902 | Bill | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Dec 16 1992 12:59 | 8 |
| Bill -
IN the 79 game vs. Houston, if I remember, it was played
in an ice storm. Pastorini was either hurt or in bad
shape. They had no offense. Still a great defense
display, that's for sure...
JD
|
35.903 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Dec 16 1992 14:43 | 30 |
|
Which '79 game? The Steelers beat Houston 2 straight years. They
beat them druing the '78 SEASON where the game was actually played
in Jan. of '79, and they beat them again during the '79 SEASON when
again, the game was played in Jan. of '80.
In the first game (78 season, played in 79), the Steelers had
379 total yards on offense to the Oilers 142. Yes, the Oilers only
managed 142 TOTAL yards! As for the next year, the Oilers managed
227 total yards to the Steelers 356. The second game was the more
memorable because that is the game where Renfro caught that pass in
the endzone that was ruled no touchdown because he didn't have both
feet inbounds.
Both games were marked somewhat by the weather, but it goes both
ways. The Steelers racked up a lot of offense on the same playing
field as the Oilers. Holding Campbell to negative yards was no
small feet no matter what the conditions seeing that Campbell was
considered the best back in the league at the time.
Looking back over the stats, one thing is apparent during those
last 4 years of the 70's which is Bradshaw had amazingly great games
during the playoffs. Some of these games were superhuman. Over 70%
completion rate (and we're not talking throwing 5 yarders to a back)
and complete consistency. Purely looking at the stats, Bradshaw really
had some hall of fame years there. I guess that's why he is in
Canton.
bill..g.
|
35.904 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Denver's QB Shuffle = Curly Shuffle | Wed Dec 16 1992 15:49 | 10 |
| The one year, they beat the Oilers 34-5, in an ice storm. I was at
that game and it was 31-3 at the half. The second half was boring from
a football standpoint, but it was great fer us inebriated fans in the
stands who was doing some big time celebrating.
The game with the Renfro "non-catch" was played in cold weather, but it
was dry as a bone.
JaKe
|
35.905 | Bill | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Dec 16 1992 16:39 | 6 |
| Bill -
Wasn't lessening the effort - just trying to remember
which game it was - the Steelers were truley awesome,
and better than Houston.
JD
|
35.906 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Wed Dec 16 1992 19:03 | 4 |
|
Heres hoping the squeelers win in minnihaha...
BG
|
35.907 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Wed Dec 16 1992 21:42 | 8 |
| >>Heres hoping the squeelers win in minnihaha...
Minor nit, the game is in Three Rivers Concrete Bowl-a-drome.
Still, sure do want those STEELERS to win.
JaKe
|
35.908 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 10:53 | 1 |
| If the Steelers lose, then it must be QB related, eh Mike?
|
35.909 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Scott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHero | Thu Dec 17 1992 11:58 | 8 |
| Boy do I remember the year the Steelers crushed the Soilers.
I loaded up on Houston that day. That was the year Dan and his
flak jacket beat the Patsies in Foxboro. The highlight of the Pats
game was when someone threw a hibachi at soon to be departing Chuck
Faribanks as he made his way up the ramp after the game. Hey, maybe
it was the Deliverance Dude who heaved the hibachi?
/Don
|
35.910 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway NFL Baby of the Year Winner | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:58 | 4 |
| I'd say Tim that the reason Pitt lost had more to do with the fact that Foster
was held to 25 yards than plain ole Bubby badness.....Also any defense that let's
an old crepid unit like the bears score 30 has got some problems.
|
35.911 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Thu Dec 17 1992 15:49 | 22 |
|
>>I'd say Tim that the reason Pitt lost had more to do with the fact that Foster
>>was held to 25 yards than plain ole Bubby badness.....
IMHO, the Steelers gave up on the running game WAY to early. After
giving up on it, they had to rely on the Bubster's arm and,
unfortunately, decisions on what passes to throw. I'd have felt a
helluva lot more comfortable with O'Donnell in there, cause Bubby
telegraphs ALL of his passes. Looking off receivers is not one of his
strong points. Hence, it seemed he was throwing into crowds all day
long.
>> Also any defense that let's
>>an old crepid unit like the bears score 30 has got some problems.
My memory may be horrible, but weren't 14 or so of those points set up
by turnovers?????
Schnort Schitt Schlepps
JaKe
|
35.912 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:23 | 4 |
| I was refering to the game this coming weekend...
Minni has a better defense than d-bears. Could be a long day for
Bubbles.
|
35.913 | Read p-name if you need clariification Tim .. | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway NFL Baby of the Year Winner | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:24 | 6 |
| Could be Jake, I didn't see the game but I do know the Bears aren't a 30 points
a game team....
Tim was fishin' and got hooked hisself.....
;^)
|
35.914 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 17:15 | 7 |
| Huh? Your p_name has no basis!;^)
It's not bubbles were talking about here, ya know the guy who
complains about being 2nd string when he is maybe 3rd string caliber at
best!
Your just mad 'cause you lost that p-name bet with BG;^)
|
35.915 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Thu Dec 17 1992 18:16 | 7 |
| Yea Mikey.. What Tim said !!!
Jake, I'm glad its in squeeler-ville... Give `em a better chance to
win and set up the Pack with a chance at the `offs
BG
|
35.916 | | DECWET::METZGER | This space being flea bombed.. | Thu Dec 17 1992 19:27 | 11 |
|
It's easy to stop Foster when you have 9 guys on the line of scrimmage. Da Bears
did just that and other teams will continue do do it with bubble at QB. When
your qb can't hit the ground with his spit then the other teams are going to gear
up to stop the run..
the squeelers aaaare in for a long road with bubble at QB...and a lot of hurt
WR's if he keeps leaving them out dry with his 11 feet above the ground passes...
Metz
|
35.917 | Steelers now 10-5, in need of a jump start | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Sun Dec 20 1992 19:28 | 14 |
| Steelers lost to the Bikes today, 6-3, sounds more like a baseball
score. I have no idea what happened in the game as I was on call this
weekend and spent all day on site, only able to listen to about 3
minutes of the game, total.
Anybody wanna provide a DECENT synopsis of the game. Foster run
good??? Brister show up, or was he still throwing hot air balloons
that just kept rising and rising and, well, ya get the picture.
Oh well, guess either 11-5 or 10-6 won't be too bad fer a team that was
expected to win 5 or 6 games this year.
JaKe
|
35.918 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Sun Dec 20 1992 23:31 | 6 |
| Yeah a baseball score between Minnesota and Pittsburgh, sort of like a
score that the Twins vs. Pirates might have come up with. Woops I
forgot, it was the Braves and Twins in the 1991 WS.
The Crazy Met
|
35.919 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Mon Dec 21 1992 11:56 | 10 |
| It was a game that showed how inept the two starting QB's were. The
Vikes turned the ball over three times in Pittsburgh territory and
muffed a FG after driving to the two-yard line. The Vikes should have
walked away with an easy win by a couple of TD's. Allen ran for over
170 yards and Foster had 119 before getting hurt at the very end. I
did feel a little bad for Bubby though, he's was getting pounded by the
Vikes D all day long. He's got to be a hurting pup this morning.
Spud
|
35.920 | A week late on this one | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:21 | 45 |
|
Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 0 3 0 3 6
Chicago 3 10 7 10 30
Chi--Butler 37 yd FG
Chi--Lewis 3 yd run (Butler PAT)
Chi--Butler 26 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 38 yd FG
Chi--N.Anderson 15 yd pass from Harbaugh(Butler PAT)
Chi--Butler 38 yd FG
STEELERS-Anderson 38 yd FG
Chi--N.Anderson 6 yd run(Butler PAT)
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Chicago
10 1st Downs 20
15-35 Rushes-Yds 44-212
105 Passing Yds 71
14-31-2 Comp-Att-Int 11-21-0
5-38 Sacked-Yds Lost 4-19
6-40 Punts 5-43
3-2 Fumbles-Lost 0-0
7-80 Penalties-Yds 4-31
22:01 Time of Possession 37:59
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 12-25, Brister 2-10, Thompson 1-0
Chicago---N.Anderson 11-56, Morgan 2-51, Lewis 16-47, Muster 8-27, Harbaugh
3-16, Green 3-12, Gentry 1-3
PASSING:
STEELERS--Brister 14-31 2 INT, 143 yds, 0 td
Chicago---Harbaugh 11-21 0 Int, 90 yds, 1 TD
RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Cooper 3-58, Graham 3-30, Foster 2-10, Thompson 2-10, Mills 1-20,
Hoge 1-7, Jorden 1-6.
Chicago---Davis 3-41, Jennings 2-15, Muster 2-6, N.Anderson 1-15,
Wright 1-8, Gentry 1-5, Lewis 1-0.
JaKe
|
35.921 | STEELERS now 10-5, MUST win nexted week fer playoofs | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:22 | 41 |
| Scoring Summary
1 2 3 4 T
Vikings 0 0 0 6 6
STEELERS 0 3 0 0 3
STEELERS--Anderson 23 yd FG
Vikings---Reveiz 38 yd FG
Vikings---Reveiz 36 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
Vikings STEELERS
18 1st Downs 17
44-216 Rushes-Yds 31-158
121 Passing Yds 130
7-18-0 Comp-Att-Int 13-22-0
1-10 Sacked-Yds Lost 3-30
3-54 Punts 6-38
3-3 Fumbles-Lost 3-1
6-64 Penalties-Yds 8-58
28:27 Time of Possession 31:33
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Vikings--Allen 33-172, Craig 5-27, A.Carter 1-14, Salisbury 3-4, Henderson
2-(-1)
STEELERS--Foster 24-118, Thompson 3-30, Stone 1-7, Hoge 2-3, Brister 1-0.
PASSING:
Vikings---Salisbury 7-17 0 Int 131 yds, 0 TD, Newsome 0-1
STEELERS--Brister 13-22 0 Int 160 yds, 0 TD
RECEIVING:
Vikings---A.Carter 4-64, Reed 2-56, Jordan 1-11.
STEELERS--Thompson 3-56, Mills 2-24, Foster 2-8, Graham 1-20, Cooper 1-20,
Hoge 1-18, Davenport 1-7, Jorden 1-5, Stone 1-2.
JaKe
|
35.922 | Injury report | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 21 1992 21:33 | 14 |
| Neil O'Donnell practiced and ran with the STEELERs today, but
tentatively, Brister is still slated to start Sunday, hopefully that
will change later in the week.
Carnell Lake, who originally was diagnosed as having sprained his ankle
yesterday, actually has a minor bone break, but will play next week.
Barry Foster's MRI on his back showed no damage, and Foster is slated
to play nexted Sunday.
Eric Green returned to practicing with the STEELERS today, and is also
expected to play Sunday.
JaKe
|
35.923 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Dec 22 1992 14:37 | 11 |
|
Geez, just when your team needs this week to rest some of its
key players, it appears that they will have to play them in order
to get a little 'mo' going into the playoffs.
I'd sit Lake, Foster, and O'Donnell and not risk further injury.
But then again, one would hate to go into the playoffs with a 3 game
losing streak!!
bill..g.
|
35.924 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 14:53 | 10 |
|
It is more than that. If SD wins and the Steelers lose than the
Steelers do not get a first round bye in the playoffs. You can bet
they want a week off.
Actually if SD and Steelers are both 11-5 who wins that tiebreaker??
What if SD, KC, Steelers are all 10-6. KC wins the division, and
who wins the KC, Pittsburgh tiebreaker??
The Crazy Met
|
35.925 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:28 | 5 |
| Pitt would beat out KC since they beat 'em earleir this year.
Thats what I saw in the paper this weekend.
Tim
|
35.926 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:35 | 3 |
| What about SD and Pitt??
The Crazy Met
|
35.927 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:44 | 9 |
|
I read that if the Steelers win, they get the first-round bye
regardless of what anyone else does. I guess this means that they win
all tie-breakers for home field too, except with Buffalo. I think it's
because of their AFC record-- Steelers have been beaten by Green Bay,
Chicago, and Minnesota from the NFC.
glenn
|
35.928 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:49 | 19 |
|
Buffalo wins a tiebreaker with the Steelers because they beat them during
the season.
To continue:
If Miami, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, SD all finish up at 11-5:
Pittsburgh, Miami, SD win the divisions.
Pittsburgh gets home field throughout the playoffs since Buffalo
would get in as a wildcard and a division winner always plays at
home against a wildcard team. So Buffalo can end up anywhere from
home field for the entire playoffs or a wildcard with the first game
at home. Given that I think Buffalo will beat Houston. Buffalo has
a lot more riding on the game than Houston does. I don't think Houston
can get a home game for the first round even if they win since I believe
they lose a tiebreaker with Miami.
The Crazy Met
|
35.929 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bush Cursed???I'd Haiti to think so!! | Wed Dec 23 1992 09:06 | 10 |
| I read that if the STEELERS end up in a 3 way tie fer best overall
record, even if Buffalo is in that group, theSTEELERS would get home
field THROUGHOUT the playoffs. This is based on the fact that if 3 or
more teams are tied, they throw out the head to head tiebreaker, and go
with conference record as the first tiebreakethe STEELERS, with a win
on Sunday, would have a 10-2 Conference record, better than the others
by a game or two or three.
JaKe
|
35.930 | Buffalo might be wild card | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Wed Dec 23 1992 10:09 | 6 |
| There's another way for the Burghers to win home court. If'n they end up
in a 3 way tie with Miami and Buffalo, then Miami would win their
division, making Buffalo the wild card team which puts them on the road
for the divisional playoff games.
TTom
|
35.931 | | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Wed Dec 23 1992 11:11 | 11 |
| re: .923
I'm with you. I'd hate to see the three you mentioned get hurt
in the last week of the season before the playoffs start,
BUT,
seein' how we're talkin' 'bout da brownies, I'd hate even more
to loose this game.
Bill
|
35.932 | It's a 'burgh thing! | MKFSB::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Mon Dec 28 1992 14:45 | 14 |
| Guess JaKe must be on vaca. Steelers clinch homefield throughout
the playoffs with a woopin' of the Brownies yesterday.
Wish I had the stats. I understand that O'Donnell did not play,
Green was back and Foster gained another >100 yds.
Steelers get a bye for the firsted week. Another week off can
only help O'Donnell.
Ah yes, the rivers are starting to ice up, snow is flying...
It's playoff time again for the Steelers.
Bill
|
35.933 | STEELERS finish 11-5, Homefield throughout the playoffs | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 28 1992 15:35 | 46 |
| Bill, ask and ye shall receive!!
1 2 3 4 T
Cleveland 0 3 7 3 13
STEELERS 7 10 3 3 23
SCORING SUMMARY
STEELERS--Foster 7 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Cleveland--Stover 22yd FG
STEELERS--Jorden 2 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 36 yd FG
Cleveland--M.Jackson 38 yd pass from Tomczak(Stover PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 29 yd FG
Cleveland--Stover 22 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG
TEAM STATS:
Cleveland STEELERS
17 First Downs 20
27-120 Rushes-Yds 30-105
173 Passing Yds 203
13-22-1 Compl-Att-Int 18-25-0
1-9 Sacked-Yds Lost 5-20
3-39 Punts 4-40
2-2 Fumbles-Lost 0-0
2-15 Penalties-Yds 6-79
28:28 Time of Possession 31:32
INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Cleveland--Hoard 7-55, Mack 10-32, Metcalf 7-25, Kosar 2-4, Tomczak 1-4
STEELERS---Foster 26-103, Stone 1-3, Hoge 1-2, Thompson 1-(-1), Brister 1-(-2)
PASSING:
Cleveland--Kosar 5-7 0 int's, 0 TD's, 41 yds, Tomczak 8-15 1 Int 1 TD, 141 yds
STEELERS---Brister 18-25 0 Int's 1 TD 223 yds
RECEIVING:
Cleveland--M.Jackson 4-85, Bavaro 4-61, Smith 2-28, Hoard 1-11, Metcalf 1-4
Mack 1-(-7)
STEELERS---Stone 5-61, Mills 3-43, Graham 3-24, Thompson 2-33, Hoge 2-31,
Foster 2-29, Jorden 1-2.
JaKe
|
35.934 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 28 1992 15:36 | 25 |
| The STEELERS, by virtue of Houston beating Buffalo lasted night, have home
field advantage for however long they last in the playoffs.
Barry Foster came in second in the NFL in rushing this year, finishing behind
Emmitt Smith of the Cowboys. Foster did tie Eric Dickerson's record of 12
games of 100 yards or more rushing in a season.
Brister had the best game he's had in years, in beating the Brown(spot)s(tm),
and failed to throw any "receiver killer" floating passes all day.
The STEELER defense in 1991 gave up 344 points, or 21.5 per game. The 1992
STEELERS gave up 226 points, or 14.1 points per game.
Five of the STEELERS wins came by ten points or less.
Bill Cowher has again stated that "Neil O'Donnell is our quarterback." Mean-
ing that we will in all probabilities see O'Donnell when the Steelers host
their first playoff game in ~2 weeks. Yaaaaaaaaay!!!!
The STEELERS will host San Francisco, New Orleans, Buffalo, New England, San
Diego, Houston, Clevescum, and Cincinnati next season. They will play on the
road at Atlanta, the LA Rams, Miami, Denver, Seattle, Clevescum, Houston, and
Cincinnati. (The Buffalo and Miami games may be switched)
JaKe
|
35.935 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 28 1992 15:48 | 16 |
| Brister started out the game 0 fer 2, but both were perfect passes
which Jeff Graham and Eric Green just dropped. Brister then rattled
off 11 straight completions in the half, and they weren't just little
dink passes. A couple were perfect sideline passes for third down
conversions. Now, personally, I cain't stand the thought of Brister in
a playoff game, although the last playoff game the STEELERS were in, he
played a good game against the Donks, BUT, if O'Donnell comes out in
two weeks and looks like crap, Cowher should consider throwing Brister
in as a reliever type QB.
IMHO, the STEELERS, although I'd like to imagine it turning out
different, probably won't go too far in the playoffs. BUT, I sure as
hell hope they suprize EVERYONE and beat the snot out of whoever they
play.
JaKe
|
35.936 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 28 1992 15:50 | 5 |
| JaKe,
here's hoping that in this case your wishes are not fulfilled.
The Crazy Met
|
35.937 | Foster? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Dec 28 1992 16:14 | 6 |
| The ESPN guys said that Foster took himself out of yesterday's game
because he was hurt. He later went back in to try to get his 100
yards (which he did). What's the deal? Is Foster hurt? If so, how
badly?
Jerry
|
35.938 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Nathan | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:04 | 8 |
| Foster was having some back pain, from the back sprain he suffered
against the Vikings the week before, and seeing the game was in hand(or
so it seemed) he took himself out.
He should be fine by the first playoff game the Steelers play.
JaKe
|
35.939 | STEELERS 11-5, final(unofficial) Stats | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Dec 28 1992 21:46 | 94 |
|
1 2 3 4 T
STEELERS 58 90 51 100 299
Opponent 33 86 56 50 225
STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
TD FG PAT Total
Anderson 0 28 29 113
Foster 11 0 0 66
Stone 3 0 0 18
Cooper 3 0 0 18
E.Mills 3 0 0 18
E.Green 2 0 0 12
Jorden 2 0 0 12
Davenport 1 0 0 6
Graham 1 0 0 6
Griffin 1 0 0 6
O'Donnell 1 0 0 6
Woodson 1 0 0 6
Hoge 1 0 0 6
Thompson 1 0 0 6
TEAM STATS:
STEELERS Opponents
283 First Downs 266
518-2157 Rushes/yds 435-1841
2751 Passing Yds 2817
245-441-14 Comp-Att-Int 252-480-22
40-296 Sacked/yds lost 36-248
28-18 Fumbles-lost 34-21
106-941 Penalties-yards 104-813
31:49 Time of Possession 28:11
RUSHING:
Rushes Yards Avg
Foster 391 1689 4.32
Thompson 35 157 4.49
Hoge 40 150 3.75
Stone 12 118 9.83
Mills 1 20 20.00
Brister 10 16 1.60
O'Donnell 26 7 0.27
W.Williams 2 0 0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 517 2157 4.21
PASSING:
Att Comp Int % Avg/com Yds TD Int %
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O'Donnell 313 185 9 59.1 12.35 2284 13 2.9
Brister 116 63 5 54.3 11.41 719 2 4.3
Royals 1 1 0 100.0 44.00 44 0 0.0
Foster 1 0 0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 431 249 14 57.8 12.24 3047 15 3.2
RECEIVING:
No. Yds Avg.
Graham 49 711 14.5
Foster 36 324 9.0
Stone 33 499 15.1
Mills 30 383 12.8
Hoge 27 232 8.6
Thompson 22 278 12.6
E.Green 14 152 10.9
Cooper 16 197 12.3
Davenport 9 136 15.1
Didio 3 39 13.0
Jorden 6 28 4.7
W. Williams 1 44 44.0
JaKe
|
35.940 | momentous occasion! re: .939 | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 29 1992 01:36 | 6 |
|
JaKe - caught without a p-name!!!
The Crazy Met
|
35.941 | Squeelers out in the second round (their first game) | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 14:51 | 4 |
| Congrats to JaKe and the Squeelers... Can't wait to get you girly mons
in mile high nexted year... The Donks will rip you apart !!
BG
|
35.942 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:27 | 8 |
| What BG, when the Doinks hire some loser to be head coach and he turns
them from a near miss into total losers, with them finishing 5-11.
STEELERS will cause Mr. Ed to look fer some EXPENSIVE dentures nexted
year.
JaKe
|
35.943 | Something like "Elway is GOD... Squeelers Suck ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 17:25 | 4 |
| Cain't hardly wait to invade the space in You and Mikey's P-Name
area nexted year.
BG
|
35.944 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Pgh. Paper back on Jan. 18th, FINALLY!! | Sat Jan 02 1993 11:13 | 11 |
| FWIW,
The STEELERS will host an AFC playoff game for the first time since
1983.
In that game in 1983, they lost to the Dan Fouts led San Diego Chargers
31-28.
JaKe
|
35.945 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Cubs in 93 | Sun Jan 03 1993 16:37 | 12 |
|
re:.944
So?? :-)
Anyways, the beer and the champagne were quite good New Year's Eve.
JaKe, what time did you get home? by what time were you uh,uh tipsy,
yeah thats the word??
The Crazy Met
|
35.946 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Pgh. Paper back on Jan. 18th, FINALLY!! | Mon Jan 04 1993 15:38 | 6 |
| Got home just before midnight, had a sixer gone by 1am.
re "So??" I DID put FWIW in front of it, if it bored ya, T S .
JaKe
|
35.947 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | STEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaks | Mon Jan 04 1993 19:50 | 6 |
| STEELERS Head Coach, Bill COwher announced today that Neil O'Donnell
WILL start the playoff game Saturday against the winners of the fixed
game that was played in Buffalo yesterday, the Bills.
JaKe
|
35.948 | And I hate the Bills !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Tue Jan 05 1993 15:51 | 6 |
|
The Houstonchoke/Greatestcombackinnflhistory/Fixedgame Spells the end
for the Squeelers... Luckalo will kick the sh*t outta the Squeelers,
Neil Odorko or not and I got a P-Name to say so, Fake !!
|
35.949 | STEELERS over Bills, 28-24 | PFSVAX::JACOB | STEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaks | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:00 | 9 |
| Big'N'Lame,
Baffle-O shot their wad coming back from that deficit, and will be
minced meat after the STEELERS take care of them(I hope).
Contact me via mail fer the p-name wager with possibilities
JaKe
|
35.950 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | STEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaks | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:27 | 9 |
|
>>Neil Odorko or not and I got a P-Name to say so, Fake !!
Ya 'fraid Big'N'Lame, ya ain't answering my mail!!!!
Hit me with the particulars, Oh Lame-O.
JaKe
|
35.951 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | R.I.P. Johnny | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:22 | 3 |
| JaKe, don't sweat it. The Steelers are going to beat Buffalo.
/Don
|
35.952 | | METSNY::francus | Cubs in 93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:27 | 4 |
| I think Buffalo will surprise the Steelers. But this is a game that is too much
of a crapshoot to try and handicap.
The Crazy Met
|
35.953 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets (suck) in '93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 15:43 | 12 |
|
>>I think Buffalo will surprise the Steelers. But this is a game that is too much
What's to suprise. Baffle-O already beat the STEELERS this year, and
the STEELERS know that if they're to advance to the AFC Championship
game, they're going to have to play their absolute best game possible.
It ain't like the late '70s when EVERYBODY expected the STEELERS to
walk away with the playoff games.
JaKe
|
35.954 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Wed Jan 06 1993 16:11 | 4 |
|
GO LUCKALO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BG
|
35.955 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jan 06 1993 16:37 | 18 |
|
Personally, I'll root all the way for the Steelers, but even if
they lose, they've still had a tremendous season. I was one way back
in August that said this was a horrible team and that they would be
lucky to win 5 games. Well, I still have doubts because of their
schedule, but they have had an exceptional year from what was expected.
I think the Steelers can win and I think they can win by >10.
Buffalo has got to be a little worn out and can't possibly be riding
as high after that miracle last Sunday. That win might of taken to
much out of them. Then on the other hand, it might just carry them
though.
Either way, break out the moth-ridden 'terrible towels'. I'll
be rootin for the Steelers.
bill..g.
|
35.956 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Mets(still suck) in '93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 17:30 | 20 |
|
>> <<< Note 35.672 by PFSVAX::JACOB "Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine" >>>
>> Only thing --dan'l, I don't think they'll reach 8-8 this year, I see
>> 6-10, or 7-9 as a probability, personally.
>> JaKe
I'm with ya ..bill.
Just glad this prediction DIDN'T come true.
Even if Baffle-O wins Sat.('cept fer the p_name I'll have to wear to
settle up with Big'N'Lame) I'll be happier than a pig in dung over the
outcome of this season. The real test, however, will be nexted season
when the STEELERS have to play the first place schedule.
JaKe
|
35.957 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Mets(still suck) in '93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 17:33 | 13 |
|
>> Either way, break out the moth-ridden 'terrible towels'. I'll
>>be rootin for the Steelers.
There have been NUMEROUS commercials on around here with Myron Cope,
Steelers color man, asking that EVERY FAN who attends the game
Saturday, enter with a terrible towel on their shoulder, ready to wave
like crazy. I even think they're giving out some kind of promotional
junk fer everybody who has one.
JaKe
|
35.958 | What's next, rootin' for the Faids?? | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 06 1993 18:03 | 11 |
|
> GO LUCKALO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> BG
And all this time we thought you were a true American, BG...
We're disappointed.
Joe
|
35.959 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets (suck) in '93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 18:43 | 12 |
|
>>And all this time we thought you were a true American, BG...
Joe,
He's rooting for Baffle-O cause he doesn't to be wearing the P_name
I've picked fer him should they lose.
BTW, tell Tom and Becky I said Hi.
JaKe
|
35.960 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets (suck) in '93 | Wed Jan 06 1993 18:47 | 12 |
|
>> <<< Note 35.951 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "R.I.P. Johnny" >>>
>> JaKe, don't sweat it. The Steelers are going to beat Buffalo.
>> /Don
Hey Slasher, why the KoD on the STEELERS????? ya gots money on
Baffle-O or sumthin?????
JaKe
|