T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
29.2 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Do the Bartman! | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:13 | 3 |
| > -< My guess: he'll get $5mil per year...... >-
From a west coast team after the 1991 season.
|
29.3 | damed if they do damed if they don't | CNTROL::CHILDS | I could use a dramatic sting here | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:20 | 10 |
|
Not west coast team but probably the Astros who are dropping all their high
priced talent now to help beef up the treasure chest his "highness" walks
away with. Soxs are in big trouble here. With their luck they give him 5
million per for 5 years quaranteed and his arm is blown out. They don't sign
him this year he has a great year and packs....
personally I'd do the later he's a head case anyways...
mike
|
29.4 | Just fill in the amount and sign it, Rog | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Clothes are a form of censorship | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:29 | 9 |
|
I say "Take a chance. Sign him."
It ain't my money, and yes, he could have a blown arm in a year. But
gee....maybe, just *maybe*, he'll continue to be the best pitcher in
the game for another five years.
Dickstah
|
29.5 | Maybe the Rangers | SALEM::DODA | Worthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, Ho | Fri Jan 11 1991 12:08 | 6 |
| Astros aren't likely to be signing anyone for that kind of money.
Their dumping all their high-priced talent because they want to
lower the payroll so a buyer can be found. Unless the teams is
sold, doubt that present management will spend the bucks.
daryll
|
29.6 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Zamfir's Heavy Metal Classics | Fri Jan 11 1991 12:20 | 4 |
| Roger would sell a lot of tickets. Plus in that canyon he would
be real tough to hit.
/Don
|
29.7 | Sox rumors | MPO::GILBERT | Pats in '91 - Showin' the fire | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:58 | 19 |
|
Talks continue between the Sox and Clemens as well as the Sox and
Mike Greenwell.
Clemens agents, the Hendrick's brothers, have stated they are looking
for a "highest paid player" contract ($4M+) and that the Sox need
to get it done within the next two weeks or so. The Hendricks
apparently have a number of clients who will keep them very busy
during arbitration hearings (the Sox appear to be equally tied here
too) and they refuse to negotiate after spring training starts.
Greenwell has placed a 4 year $12 million plus deal on the table. The
Sox have offered four years at around $11 million. Greenwell will
probably file for arbitration shortly. I still expect the Sox to
trade him. After all, would you nearly double your original offer
to a guy whose position is fillable?
|
29.8 | Clemens appeal | CNTROL::MACNEAL | Papa Mac | Tue Jan 29 1991 09:26 | 4 |
| Roger Clemens met with the AL president yesterday to appeal his
suspension for his actions in the ALCS. Ren� Lachemann, third base
coach for the As, provided a letter which backed up Roger's version of
the events leading up to his ejection.
|
29.9 | "Don't you know who I am?" | CNTROL::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Tue Jan 29 1991 09:58 | 6 |
|
and because the Bank of Kuawait is located in the same building everyone
entering has to be stopped and searched. Boy I would have like to seen
his "highness" reaction to that....
mike
|
29.11 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Parade in October 91,92,93,94,95 | Mon Feb 11 1991 08:53 | 8 |
|
Clemens signs! The price? Half the oil in Kuwait, but who cares?
YAHOO!!! THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER! THE
FRUSTRATION ENDS! COMMITMENT TO WINNING IS REALIZED! MANY LONG TIME
SOX FANS CAN DIE HAPPY!! YIPPEE!
Dickstah
|
29.12 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in 1991 | Mon Feb 11 1991 09:11 | 5 |
| If this team doesn't come smoking out of the starting gate, the "ya bum
ya" types are going to be on them like flies on you-know-what...
py
|
29.13 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Parade in October 91,92,93,94,95 | Mon Feb 11 1991 09:37 | 9 |
|
> If this team doesn't come smoking out of the starting gate, the "ya bum
> ya" types are going to be on them like flies on you-know-what...
And deservedly so.
Dickstah
|
29.14 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dee Nice | Mon Feb 11 1991 12:08 | 5 |
| The amount of money they gave Clemens doesn't make me as mad
as the money they gave Greenteeth�! With Clemens the contract is
a gamble, with Greenteeth� it's a handout.
/Don
|
29.15 | bring back rogelio moret | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Mon Feb 11 1991 12:28 | 9 |
| Whoa,
Let's not castigate dem Sox already if they don't come out smokin'
After Clemens and Darwin,can the Sox rely on a good 3rd or 4th starter
(Young,Dopson,Harris, somebody please step forward). And what about
team speed? Burks and that's it. And 3 mil for a Dh( greenwell cain't
field,he's the dick stuart of the outfield). Plenty of questions
MikeL
|
29.16 | same old ____ different day... | AGNT99::CHILDS | Tango & Cash, George Bush | Mon Feb 11 1991 13:57 | 5 |
| Yahoo they signed Clemens, I don't have to worry about material for the next
5 years. It a shame though to see them throw money at Greeny, Bruno and Clark
whilst Ellis sits around waits....
mike
|
29.17 | | AGNT99::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 11 1991 14:42 | 8 |
| �It a shame though to see them throw money at Greeny, Bruno and Clark
� whilst Ellis sits around waits....
There's nothing out of the ordinary going on here. It's the same as
any company. The guys with seniority get the big bucks. Ellis will
get his. Either the Sox will give it to him now to avoid a free agent
hassel in the future, or he'll get a raise from the arbitrator and be
able to go free agent next time.
|
29.18 | bridge for sale!!!
| AGNT99::CHILDS | Tango & Cash, George Bush | Mon Feb 11 1991 15:18 | 5 |
| hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaa
believe what you want Mac, but I know it's not a senority thingy....
mike
|
29.19 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 11 1991 15:52 | 6 |
| � believe what you want Mac, but I know it's not a senority thingy....
Burkes has absolutely 0 bargaining power other than arbitration.
Seniority lands a player in the free agent market where the big bucks
are given out. I believe Greenwell is a year closer to free agency
than Burkes is.
|
29.20 | Sox get million $ outfield | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:57 | 4 |
| Sox sign Burkes to a 1 year contract reportedly worth $1.825 million.
Sox are going into Winter Haven with no contract grumblings (no
holdouts, no ugly arbitration hearings) for the first time in a while.
|
29.21 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Mon Feb 18 1991 13:24 | 14 |
| Since the Sox have so much money to spend on their players, they'd
better make it good for the fans this year. I'd expect to see
some high class promotions. Some suggestions are:
- Rolex Watch Day
- Gucci Handbag Day
- Dom Perignon Day
With Promotions like this, they'll set attendance records and allow
maximum exposure of their gold plated, billion dollar all club....
'Saw
|
29.22 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 18 1991 13:54 | 3 |
| 'Saw, they are already setting attendance records.
Besides, I'd rather have a champeenship than a Gucci handbag.
|
29.23 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Mon Feb 18 1991 14:03 | 5 |
| � Besides, I'd rather have a champeenship than a Gucci handbag.
Gee, I was kind of hoping to complete my set of Gucci stuff ;^)!!!!
'Saw
|
29.25 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Mon Feb 18 1991 14:08 | 5 |
| Heck, the fans have waited SO LONG for a champeenship, if they win
one, they should give the FANS World Series rings and not the players!
hahahahha,
'Saw
|
29.26 | Lou Lou where are you? | MPO::GILBERT | Where have all the flowers gone? When will they learn | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:18 | 22 |
|
While they won't have any contract squabbles to worry about don't
count on this team to be quiet and reserved. Mike Marshall is already
bellyaching about how great he is and that he should be handed a
job or traded. He's pissin' and moanin' about Vaughn and Quintana.
The guy hasn't completed a season in 5 years and spent the winter
exploring possibilities in a foreign country. Get real.
Then there'll be the Clemens_tribute_to_the_departed nonsense.
And there's bound to be a Lou Gorman statement about Britt Burns
or one of these other aging arms being another "Jack Billingham".
Oh yah, By the Way, we also have all these millionaire outfielders
who'll now start griping about all kinds of other things.
Nay, nay. Things are never dull for very long in Sox land.
What didya say? The truck ain't shown up yet? The doors to the park
are locked?
Typical.
|
29.27 | It's gonna happen. You heard it here... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:37 | 6 |
|
Look for the Sox to win a champeenship in the next five years. I'm
serious.
glenn
|
29.28 | Give me Louis Rotereur's Rose. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Tue Feb 19 1991 08:17 | 7 |
|
Dom's over-rated, unless it's a Rose of course!
Steve
|
29.29 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Tue Feb 19 1991 08:53 | 9 |
| � Dom's over-rated, unless it's a Rose of course!
Shows you what I know. I'm a beer and whisky man myself, so champagne
is a bit out of my sphere of knowledge.....
I'll have to defer in all cases...
'Saw
|
29.30 | It's probably out of your price range, too. :^> | WFOV12::MORRISON | Homer Simpson's twin brother | Tue Feb 19 1991 09:24 | 5 |
| 'Saw, you can defer in all cases. I'll drinking all the cases :^>
Bull~
|
29.31 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Tue Feb 19 1991 10:21 | 13 |
| � 'Saw, you can defer in all cases. I'll drinking all the cases :^>
�
� Bull~
hahahahahahaha!
We need another one of those all-afternoon drinkups at the Tavern!
'saw
|
29.32 | @^)-hic | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Tue Feb 19 1991 10:26 | 8 |
|
Believe me 'Saw if I had my choice bixtween an expensive bottle
of chapagne or a case of Oktoberfest, I'd take the brew anyday!
Unless of course the bottle of champagne happens to be a Magnum!
Steve
|
29.33 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Freedom bell rang; he cried NO MAS | Tue Feb 19 1991 11:13 | 12 |
|
The Woostah papah has an editorial cartoon today of the Red Sox bus
heading down to spring training, and there's singing coming out of the
bus:
"A hundred bottles of Dom Perignon on the wall, a hundred bottles of
Dom...."
Looks like they've been scooped by the SportsNotes.
Dickstah
|
29.34 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Tue Feb 19 1991 11:51 | 7 |
| One refreshing change this year is that the Sox have to be considered
favorites in the east (along wif Toronto) - so in here and in the Sox
notes I won't have to wade through the usual "overachieving" B.S. that
most Sox fans throw out every year. There are NO excuses if the high
rolling Sox don't do it this year.
JD
|
29.35 | | FDCV06::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:18 | 4 |
| A couple of years ago it was 24 players- 24 cabs...
Now its 24 players and 24 limos.....
REK
|
29.36 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:19 | 16 |
| The best cartoon was the one run in the Herald Sunday. It showed
Roger stepping out of a Rolls Royce that had steer horns on the
hood. Over on the side were another 10-20 Rolls Royces with different
players names on them. Underneath the caption read... "The Boston
Red Sox, 24 players, 24 Rolls Royces." 8^)
Also that Philly writer Conlan was debating with Bob Ryan whether
or not Roger should've gotten the money. Conlan had a classic line...
"why would you guarantee over 20 million to a guy who *could* spend
the rest of the season with Nurse Ratched saying 'put the ball in
the hole Chief'" I was rolling. Was almost as good as his "one
foot on a banana peel and the other in the Betty Ford Clinic" when
talking about the Yankees guaranteeing Pascual Perez's contract
last year. The guy's a piece of work.
/Don
|
29.37 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Support the liberation of Kuwait | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:30 | 13 |
| JD, I disagree. I don't see Boston taking the East as I feel that
numbers 2-5 in the rotation are still question marks. Also, unless Rob
Murphy returns to his 1989 form, I don't see anyone stepping forward to
fill Larry Anderson's role. Reardon's back still has to be tested over
the long haul. No closer, no parade in October.
Toronto has a better everyday lineup and a healthy Baltimore will
compete to the end.
Boston may have the fattest payroll, but they still need to fill some
key holes.
Mark.
|
29.38 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:39 | 24 |
| Hey thanks Mark. Now, come Sept. when the Sox are still in it, I can
hear the familiar litany "Who ever expected them to be where they are.
What a gutsy bunch of guys. Overachieving to the max. Blah, blah,
blah"
I don't know, in the past, teams spending a lot of cash were put down
if they didn't win it all. Sox have NO excuses this year. If they
don't win this year, they will be chokers, plain and simple.
By popular opinion (Boston-area), the Sox have the best pitcher in
baseball, the best 3rd baseman, the best catcher, 2nd baseman and
center fielder in the American league, a solid left and right fielder,
plus a solid first base/designated hitter combo. After the franchise,
they have a very passable starting rotation, plus a stopper.
This team is talented. This is not an overachieving team. This is an
underachieving team.
No excuses. No excuses. No excuses. It's finally put up or shut up
time for this team. No more loveable 2nd place finishes, no more
valient sweeps in the playoffs. Either win it all or drop to the
cellar.
JD
|
29.39 | JD, try switching to Decaf... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:44 | 1 |
|
|
29.40 | Darwin + Young = Boddicker? Reardon = Smith? | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 19 1991 13:01 | 1 |
|
|
29.41 | Underacheiver = Mets | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 19 1991 13:02 | 1 |
|
|
29.43 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Sox go 162-0; swept in playoffs | Tue Feb 19 1991 13:31 | 2 |
|
|
29.44 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | The Celtics are for real | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:21 | 11 |
| It'll come down to whether or not Darwin and Young succeed in picking
up the slack left by Boddicker's departure. If they do, the Sox should
win it. Toronto is different, but I'm not convinced they're better;
much as I'd like to see the O's win it, I still think they're a year
and a Rhodes and a Mussina away.
If Darwin and Young fall flat on their faces, this team could very
easily finish fifth....
py
|
29.45 | More sad, dishonest Red Sox rhetoric (try living in Cleveland) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:40 | 12 |
|
Exactly what expectations did *you* have for the Red Sox the past five
years, JD? Anything close to the three division titles and one
pennant that they did win?
To be sure, the Red Sox have been imperfect and have come up short, but
I've probably gotten more enjoyment out of watching them play over the
last five years than have the baseball fans in all but a few cities
(and I'm first and foremost a displaced Baltimore Orioles fan!)
glenn
|
29.46 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:45 | 22 |
| Pena is a good solid catching, perhaps approaching greatness. But the best?
I love to watch him play however.
I tend to agree with Hawk.
The Sox have marginally increase their talent over last year, for a much
more expensive outlay of dinero. Personally, while some of you may
disagree, I think that Gorman could General Manage his way out of a
paper bag. And while they owner may not be a blatantly inept as
George was, they have been quietly mucking up the works for years.
Pitching wins ball games. Team speed wins ball games. The Red Sox
have one great pitcher, and a passable remainder as JD has said.
They have know team speed. Even I, who have all the speed of
Yogi Berra carrying a Franklin Stove, would be fast on the REd Sox....
Alas, I think we've just spent a ton of dough to keep the status quo...
No parade in October....what else could you expect?
'saw
|
29.47 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:46 | 9 |
| �disagree, I think that Gorman could General Manage his way out of a
Geez, forget ONE word, and your meaning goes out the window.
Please mentally insert the word NOT follow "could".
Thank you.
|
29.48 | Depends on if it's his lunch bag or not ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:54 | 10 |
|
Wasn't that supposed to have been a WET paper bag, 'Saw? When I first
read it, and thought that not only could Gorman manage his way out of a
paper bag, but a *dry* one, I said to myself, "Damn, that's impressive.
I'm glad the Sox are in such good hands..."
Quite a feat for Lou, if'n ya think about it...
glenn
|
29.49 | They've given excitement over the past 5 years..... | DECWET::METZGER | John-man,johnster,johnerino,the j-man... | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:54 | 26 |
|
That's what I love so much about baseball. You can't tell anything about a team
judging it from pre-season. You can't even predict one game from another
never mind trying to predict a whole season..
Who would have figured the White Sox to play so well last year and the Royals
so poorly? Joe superstar can just as easily have a horrible season as a good one
during any given year. There's just too many variables to say if X team doesn't
win it all than they've underachieved (except if it's the Mets)
Granted the A's should be in the playoff hunt with the talent on the team but to
predict in the pre-season when there's 162 games plus playoffs to go that they
should win it all without a doubt is really quite funny.
Especially with a team like the Sox with some huge holes in their lineup
(Starting pitching after Clemens, Closer, SS) you can't predict much of anything.
The Royals, Angels and Padres have proven many a time that having the highest
paid players doesn't mean that you have the best.
If the Sox had signed Boddicker then I'd say they would be the favorites to win
the AL East..but with Young (19 losses) and Darwin trying to fill his shoes I
have to say the East is a toss up this year between the Sox, O's and Jays.
Metz
|
29.50 | | CAM::WAY | Too much forking, lots of child processes | Tue Feb 19 1991 14:55 | 20 |
| Glenn,
I gotta have the field circus guy come out and look at this
keyboard. It throwing a words is very you know.
I mean, It KEEPS throwing a LOT OF words AND is very EXASPERATING you know!
Right.
Lou Gorman manage bags!
I mean
Lou Gorman could not General Manage his way out of a wet paper bag!
Phew!
'Saw
|
29.51 | WRONG, BIG-TIME GLENN | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Tue Feb 19 1991 15:58 | 29 |
| Glenn,
First, where do you get off with the sad dishonest bullsh*t? I've
expected a LOT from the Sox over the last 5 years. They've had a very
talented team, except that Sox fans, for the most part, seem to feel
securer if they label them as average - thereby the scenario of"
* If they win, it's amazing that they did it, what with the lack of
talented players that play for them.
* If they don't win, it's - "Hey who expected them to do anything,
anyway"
The negative response I get from the so-proclaimed Red_Sox Super Fan
Jihad, both here and in the Sox notes, only leaves me to believe that
most Sox fans are afraid to say the Sox are good. Afraid that the
razzing they've given other teams will come back to haunt them.
So Glenn, I know it's hard for you to believe, but you're way off base
on this point. I've been a Sox fan my whole life, and I feel that
they've had a good product over the last few years - and that they've
underachieved, not overachieved.
And my feelings are being borne out again - everyone is already
starting the" "well, we ain't really that good, oh sob" - but come
August it will be "WOW, what a bunch of overachievers!!! What a bunch
of scrappy, blue collar players... "
JD
|
29.52 | Where is that de-caf? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 19 1991 16:21 | 24 |
|
> First, where do you get off with the sad dishonest bullsh*t? I've
Probably the same place you do with the usual "sanctimonious" Red Sox
fan routine. You don't take it too seriously, and neither will I,
okay?
> And my feelings are being borne out again - everyone is already
> starting the" "well, we ain't really that good, oh sob" - but come
> August it will be "WOW, what a bunch of overachievers!!! What a bunch
> of scrappy, blue collar players... "
Not from me. If you noticed, yesterday I said that this team has
enough going for it, with their current players and what I see coming
up, that I have reasonable expectations that they'll win it all
sometime in the next five years. I don't think you could have made
that statement five years ago, and if you did, I think you were being
unrealistic.
By the way, what're you gonna do if they ever do win it, JD? Enjoy it
or implode from all that pent-up frustration? ;-)
glenn
|
29.53 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Support the liberation of Kuwait | Tue Feb 19 1991 16:27 | 3 |
| JD, what a crock. (lats notwithstanding)
Mark.
|
29.54 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Tue Feb 19 1991 16:33 | 9 |
| Glenn,
Sanctimonious can be easily proven. Just read the Sox notesfile for a
year or so. More back-patting in there then at the dog show.
Boston teams are generally characterized as gutsy underachievers. Many
fans characterize other teams as ovverated, media hyped, etc....
JD
|
29.55 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 19 1991 16:35 | 17 |
| JD, just about everyone in baseball, not just in Beantown, didn't
expect the Sox to win the AL East when they did. If you really think
Kieker, Bolton, Gray, et.al. didn't overacheive last season, I guess
you didn't get that many games in Seattle.
I think there will be big things expected of the Sox this year, though.
There won't be as many distractions in spring training. Burkes,
Greenwell, Brunansky, and Reardon are healthy. They've added a slugger
in Jack Clark.
There are some serious questions on this club, though. Can Darwin and
Young replace Boddicker? Can Murphy come back to form and give them
back a Larry Anderson type stretch performance. Will Lamp's luck
finally run out? How is Reardon's back really holding up? Will we see
sophmore slumps from the likes of Bolton, Kieker, Gray, and Quintana?
I'm just going to sit back and enjoy being close to baseball again.
|
29.56 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Tue Feb 19 1991 17:14 | 12 |
| Mac,
How can a team win 3 of 5, yet everyone not expect nothing less than a
title year? That unreal. With the lineup they have, they should
always be in it. The pitching isn't as bad as everyone is making it
out to be. I strongly feel that Darwin will win at least 16 games.
Clemens should win about 27 with that lineup.
Overall, the Sox strenghtened the team in the offseason. They should
take the next logical step up. A World Series berth is expected by me.
JD
|
29.57 | | COOKIE::WAHL | | Tue Feb 19 1991 17:48 | 22 |
| As a somewhat objective bysitter, I think JD's got a pretty solid
point. I was in Boston doing Sandbox demos at DECWorld last August
when the Sox started to struggle and the papers, TV and radio
reporting was nothing but "Oh, well, this was inevitable. The boys was
playin' over dere heads, an' it's come home to roost." Remember the
Globe printing the countdown as the Sox lost their lead in the AL East?
I kept that one for a souvenir.
My wife made a nifty comment when she came back to New England with me
for a foliage vacation and business trip. She was looking at the Globe
one morning during breakfast, either right after the ChiSox series or
after the first game of the LCS. Somebody was paying the Sox a left
handed complement for staying alive long enough to have the opportunity
get vaporized in the LCS. She commented, "This town doesn't deserve
this team."
To be fair (as George reminded me in the baseball notesfile last year),
the media isn't the same as the fans. But I do think that a lot of
people read this crud and it affects the way a whole bunch of people
think about the Red Sox.
Dave W.
|
29.58 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Wed Feb 20 1991 07:51 | 7 |
| So if we are using payroll as the measuring stick of a team's
talent one would have to surmise that the team with the largest
payroll is the league's best, and if that team does not win the
World Series they choked. Want to guess who has the largest payroll
in baseball?
/Don
|
29.59 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Support the liberation of Kuwait | Wed Feb 20 1991 08:13 | 56 |
|
Pitchers
1990 1991
ROTATION:
1. Clemens Clemens
2. Boddicker.......Darwin
3. Harris..........Young
4. Bolton Bolton
5. Kiecker Kiecker/Dopson
BULLPEN:
6. Reardon Reardon
7. Andersen........Harris
8. Gray Gray
9. Murphy Murphy
10. Lamp Lamp/Kiecker/Hetzel
Hesketh Hesketh
Gardner.........
Departed: Boddicker, Andersen, Gardner
Added: Darwin, Young, (healthy Dopson?)
Everyday players and bench
1990 1991
STARTERS:
11. C Pena Pena
12. 1B Quintana.....Vaughn
13. 2B Reed Reed
14. 3B Boggs Boggs
15. SS Rivera.......Naehring
16. LF Greenwell Greenwell
17. CF Burks Burks
18. RF Brunansky Brunansky
19. DH Evans........Clark
BENCH:
20. Marshall.....Quintana (Marshall?)
21. Barrett......Rivera
22. Heep.........Moses
23. Marzano Marzano
24. Romine Romine (Plantier?)
25. Kutcher Kutcher
Departed: Evans, Barrett, Heep, (Marshall?)
Added: Vaughn, Naehring, Clark, Moses, (Plantier?)
Net minus on the pitching side, and if Reardon's back isn't healed you
can throw away a third of Clemens' wins.
Net plus with the everyday lineup, but a lot of question marks
regarding the long term health of Clark and Naehring.
Overall, I see little improvement over last year's team.
Mark.
|
29.60 | By and large, the Fenway crowd is positive... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 20 1991 09:44 | 36 |
|
> My wife made a nifty comment when she came back to New England with me
> for a foliage vacation and business trip. She was looking at the Globe
> one morning during breakfast, either right after the ChiSox series or
> after the first game of the LCS. Somebody was paying the Sox a left
> handed complement for staying alive long enough to have the opportunity
> get vaporized in the LCS. She commented, "This town doesn't deserve
> this team."
I think there's some confusion here. The Boston media's attitude
towards the Red Sox is a lot closer to JD's than those of the fans who
can appreciate what they've done in the recent past. That is, come
last September the papers starting filling up with the "choke" stories,
immediately followed by the ALCS "choke" stories, and inevitably there
would have been World Series "choke" stories had they made it that far.
Sure, occasionally a Bob Ryan pops in for an apologetic reality check,
but generally the Shaughnessys of the papers dominate and are quick,
swift and relentless with the hammer, regardless of the circumstances.
I even heard Nick Cafardo, a competent baseball writer, come right out
and say on a radio show last week that as a beat man he gets much more
enjoyment out of his work with a losing Boston club than a winning one.
I'd say that's typical in Boston. In some other cities no one would
even bother picking up the paper if the team wasn't doing well, but in
Boston it's relished by the media and a very vocal contingent of
malcontented fans.
I don't think your wife was referring to the fans who appreciated
the effort and came away nothing more than a little disappointed with
their ALCS performance (which was not up to snuff, win or lose, I
freely admit). Anyone who was sincerely counting on an ALCS win over
the A's, followed up by a World Series victory, was not residing in
this world. Hoping, yes, but not expecting...
glenn
|
29.62 | | CAM::WAY | The time you won your town the race | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:24 | 20 |
| One thing that you can say about the Boston Red Sox is that their fans
are loyal. Regardless of what attitudes may be attributed to us,
or regardless of what excuses are attributed to us, we are LOYAL.
My dad has been a Red Sox fan for years and years and years. I've
been a Sox fan since I started following baseball in 1966.
No matter what they have done, no matter what Liebestod we've gone
through in 1967, 1975 (bad), 1986 (THE WORST), we've stood by them.
In fact, if/when the Sox ever win the Big One, I won't know how to
react.
JD, I can understand what you are saying, but if you take a step
back there are many, many teams whose fans are the same way.
It's not just a Boston phenomenon in this case....
'Saw
|
29.63 | | REFINE::ASHE | Whatever happened to Bic Bananas? | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:25 | 4 |
| I'd bet Plantier and Vaughn start the year in the minors so they don't
accumulate seniority for future arbitration later....
-Walt
|
29.64 | | COOKIE::WAHL | | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:43 | 16 |
| I agree about the crowd which shows up for the games, Glenn. I love
going to games at Fenway. Of course, I like going to the Twinkie
Metrodome too, which tells you that I have no standards ;-).
It seems to me that Boston has embraced Red Sox chokes as some kind of
cultural heritage. Some towns think winning is a birthright, and other
towns have baseball but almost conciously ignore it until the team gets
into the pennant race with a shot at the big prize. But Boston seems
unique in this pessimism.
As far as paying players is concerned: you may not be able to buy a
pennant, but I think there is a flip side to that principle -- you can
fritter a good team away by not rewarding them or by rewarding them
inequally. Take a look at Houston and the post-Thrift Pirates.
Dave W.
|
29.65 | seriously Walt, I won't bet against you... | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Feb 20 1991 11:01 | 8 |
| re .63:
Moe Vaughn, whom the Boston media has already handed the AL Rookie of
the Year award to on a silver platter, start the year in the minors?
Heaven forbid... :-)
py
|
29.67 | will they win one in my lifetime? | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Wed Feb 20 1991 11:40 | 22 |
|
I,too,.have been a loyal,diehard Sox fan for years. I agree that the
media creates an atmosphere of expected doom for the Sox which the fans
always point to when the Sox end up on the losing end. However, it
doesn't deter me from rooting my a** off for them every year. I think
one of these years, they're going to win it all. Glenn, I agree with
you that a champeenship will come within 5 yrs(look at the influx of
young talent, Reed,Naehring,Vaughn,etc. just keep developing some
young pitching and keep the pursestrings relatively open). But, then
again I've been an optimist all these years.
I'm still not over '86 tho, and every btime the Sox come close,I
always expect the worst. I'll never forget being at a Halloween party
watching game 6,with all the partgoers seemingly throwin them pitches
with Schiraldi and Stanley. As soon as they lost, party was over. The
house was cleared out in 10 minutes.
Hey 'Saw, how close are you to the Connecticut Yankee-Red Sox mythical
d-mark line? closer to Pew haven than Hereford?
MikeL
|
29.68 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Wed Feb 20 1991 11:48 | 7 |
| Walt, old bonehaid Morgan is already sowing those seeds in the
media with his "it's Quintana job" quotes. My guess is Mo will get the
call after a good start in the minors and they will *try* to trade Carlos
to anyone who wants a 25 year old firstbaseman with the body of a 40 year
old.
/Don
|
29.69 | | CAM::WAY | The time you won your town the race | Wed Feb 20 1991 11:55 | 20 |
| > Hey 'Saw, how close are you to the Connecticut Yankee-Red Sox mythical
> d-mark line? closer to Pew haven than Hereford?
Nope. I grew up in Glastonbury, which is just slightly south east of
Hartford, across the Connecticut River.
It's smack dab in the middle of that area that is the MIX of Yankmee and
Red Sox fans. One of my dad's best friends was a Yankee fan. You should
have heard the two of them go at it. The "best" was when the Yanks
and Sox would play head to head. One time I remember Yaz fanned to end
the game. The stuff from the Yank's fan was unbearable, until later
in the series, Yaz had an excellent game to help the Sox come from behind
to win -- then it went the other way....
Nothin' like it....
'Saw
|
29.70 | Red Sox fans are special | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Wed Feb 20 1991 12:11 | 50 |
| No, I beg to disagree ...
Right now, Red Sox fans are a breed unto themselves. Just about all of
that special something is wrapped up in the l-o-n-g titleless streak
dating back to 1918. And each seven-game nightmare Series loss (1946,
1967, 1975, 1986) just enhances the dark legend that much more.
Other teams have long losing histories. The Cubs and the Phillies come to
mind. The Cubs' fans, who have waited even longer than Boston, seem to
inspire a lovable "what-the-hell-let's-party" attitude about their
misfortunes. Many, many times I have resolved to adopt that exact
attitude about my own favorites if only to save my own sanity.
Red Sox fans will do no such thing. Each loss is another chapter in the
I-Told-You-This-Is-Agony Book.
I sympathize with Red Sox fans and I wish they could have a title. I grew
up a Phillies fan and the 1970s were a gut-wrenching roller coaster ride.
They had a simply awesome team with a young Mike Schmidt and a prime time
Steve Carlton. They had great defense, plenty of sock, solid fundamentals
and a deep bullpen. They were my dream team.
However they had the albatross of 97 years of franchise history and not a
single title to show for it. And their long history of failures was just
as heart-rending as the Red Sox. Whisper "1964" in any Phillies' fan's
ear and you'll see him shudder in dread horror of that debacle.
So, they won three straight *dominating* division titles in 1976, 1977,
and 1978 yet lost in the playoffs each year.
And the doom gloomed lower each year. Finally, Danny Ozark was canned
and Pete Rose arrived and all the ghosts went away forever in 1980.
*** FOREVER ***
I sincerely hope the Boston Red Sox can have their own "1980" someday.
But you will have to give up a certain part of your "heritage" as Sox
fans. 1980 was the Promised Land for the Phillies but once you drink from
the Holy Grail, the whole world changes. The drink is sweet, no doubt,
but it marks a significant change and you'll never drink the old drink
again. Part of the special unique feeling you have now as Red Sox fans
will be gone forever. A lot of people will gladly say so long but still
others will look back and say it was so simple back then when they blew it
every year.
How Red Sox fans survived 1986 is beyond me. I have never seen sports
fate so cruel and rotten than in the 10th inning of Game Six in Shea
Stadium.
Bob Hunt
|
29.71 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Feb 20 1991 12:30 | 12 |
| >> Walt, old bonehaid Morgan is already sowing those seeds in the
>>media with his "it's Quintana job" quotes.
I read the same quotes, /Don, but I read them differently. I think Morgan was
just stating the obvious for the papers. People have already awarded Mo Vaughn
the rookie of the year/MVP trophies. Morgan was just reminding people that it
was Quintana's job to lose in spring training (same for Rivera/Naehring at SS).
He points out that the lineup that won them the pennant last year was a good
starting place for the spring and the rookies would have to win their jobs from
the vets. That's a healthy attitude.
j.
|
29.72 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Wed Feb 20 1991 12:48 | 18 |
| Hawk and Saw - I've been saying for years that 'fans are fans" - but
there's still that "boston fans are the best in the world" mentality.
Yep, Mark, you iced it. The division winning team is improved over
last year. The Jays aren't as good, IMO. Sox should repeat. I expect
it. I'm with the Sox where I was with the Giants in 1985. After
decades of nothing, the Giants finally made the NFL playoffs in 81.
The team had a bad year, but generally improved. I started to not
revel in merely making the playoffs, or making it beyond the first
round. I wanted a division title, I wanted a Championship. And they
delivered. IMO, you have to go beyond, at times, being happy with a
excellent loss. The Sox need positive kharma from the fans. After
they win it all, then revert back tothe old ways. I did it with the
Giants, which is why this year's championship was completely sweet..
It's been fun seeing ya squirm, though.
JD
|
29.73 | I think Vaughn's safe... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 20 1991 12:50 | 10 |
|
Mo Vaughn will come north with the club unless he absolutely stinks
Winter Haven up, whether he's the starter or not. There's been too
much written about him, and too many glowing reports from within the
organization for anything else to happen. Don't expect to see any
fuel for the racist/arbitration fire from this one, even if it's
because the issue has been pointed out and everyone's watching...
glenn
|
29.74 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Support the liberation of Kuwait | Wed Feb 20 1991 13:25 | 6 |
| JD, I challenge you to dig up even *one* example of a anyone in here
saying Boston fans are number 1.
REK don't count.
Mark.
|
29.75 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Feb 20 1991 13:55 | 28 |
| I've always kind of liked the Sox
The Chicago WHITE Sox!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Cubs and White Sox... ALL THE WAY!!!!
WHATTA SERIES!!!!!!!!!!
ALL TOGETHER NOW!!!:::
TAKE! ME out to the BALLLL gaaame
TAKE! me out with the Crowwwwwd
BUY me some peanuts and CRACKerjacks
I don't care if I EVer get back
So let's ROOT ROOT ROOT for the Cuuuuubbies
if they don't win it's a shaaaaaaame!!!
`Cause it's ONE... TWO... THREEE strikes you're out
at the OLLLLLLLLLD... BALLLLLLLLL GAAAAAME!!!
YEEEAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Mike JN
|
29.76 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Wed Feb 20 1991 13:56 | 14 |
| Mark,
Firsted off, the archived copies of SPORTS aren't available - and
frankly I don't have time. Heck - "M.L." Carr's p_name for a long long
time was "Boston - best overall Sports town". I've read the Boston
fans are #1 in the Globe, Herald, the Sports note, and the Red Sox
note. Hey Mark, I lived there fore 13 years - right in the heart of
town. My arguement was always that they were no different than fans of
other cities - Big Mac should be able to back that up - we sent mail
about it when he first went to Texas. It stemmed from the great NY
bashes that used to go on all the time.
JD
|
29.77 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Wed Feb 20 1991 14:08 | 2 |
| He's got no proof Mark. I bet you beat him in the "Fenway Great
Lat Posedown" this year too.
|
29.78 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Sox go 162-0; swept in playoffs | Wed Feb 20 1991 14:13 | 8 |
|
Re .70 Bob Hunt
That was a truly beautiful note. Certainly worthy of the Red Sox notes
file, where all the best writers are.
Dickstah
|
29.79 | Boston may not be the hands down best but close to it | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Wed Feb 20 1991 14:34 | 14 |
| I dont see the big difference in this years team compared to last year
just that there paying big money up front rather than waiting untill
after people hold out before giving them the big money...Most cities
would kill to have sports teams like boston (other than a few). We
have the celtics (Best Basketball team of all time, most championships
great fans, the garden). We have the Broons, who in case you didnt
know have the longest winning streak of any professional sport (thats
an above .500 season)..Then we got the soxs, who cosistently almost
get there, but they give the fans something to be excited about. Then
lastly the patiots, who never win but sure get alot of press, and hey
ya got ta love em....So sit back relax and watch the redsox almost get
there once again, and if you think there going to win it all you better
put some money on it becasue im sure it will pay great odds....
MaB
|
29.80 | | DECWET::METZGER | Natasha - Go get Moose and Squirrel | Wed Feb 20 1991 14:49 | 20 |
|
Having lived in Seattle for 6 months now I think that their is a difference
between Boston fans and Seattle fans.
The Boston fans are more knowledgeable about their teams but tend to use it
in a negative way. (ie xxx sucks, xxx should be traded) Around here you get
more positive statements. The fans are a lot more rabid about football but
could care less about Basketball and baseball.
You also seem to get a lot more people that could care less about professional
sports in any way.
Boston fans tend to pat themselves on the back a lot and look snobbily down
on other cities....
JMHO,
Metz
|
29.81 | | FDCV07::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Wed Feb 20 1991 15:31 | 5 |
| Cute Laflub, real cute....
REK
|
29.82 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Thu Feb 21 1991 07:17 | 2 |
| Hey Metz what do you know anyway, you thought Spike Owen was
an All Star!
|
29.83 | | CAM::WAY | The time you won your town the race | Thu Feb 21 1991 08:06 | 15 |
| Well, I'm one of those unusual fans who support some Boston teams
and some New York teams. I'm fiercely loyal to all of them.
I think there is a certain mystique to being a Boston fan. Whether or
not that's different than being a fan of another team from another
large metropolitan area, I can't say.
I think it takes a certain kind of something to be a Boston Red Sox
fan, just as it took a certain kind of something to be a New York
Giants fan in the late 60's and all of the 70s.
I try to avoid (on a personal level) handing out superlatives such
as BEST. I mean, you can't compare apples and oranges....
'Saw
|
29.84 | The crowning glory of boyhood | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Rah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx! | Wed Mar 06 1991 18:30 | 9 |
| >No matter what they have done, no matter what Liebestod we've gone
>through in 1967, 1975 (bad), 1986 (THE WORST), we've stood by them.
Frank, please don't leave out 1978. I've heard opinions that it was
even worse than '86 from some circles.
Mark, do you remember what happened?
Dan
|
29.85 | He picks wings off flies, too. | COOKIE::RECURS::WAHL | | Thu Mar 07 1991 00:40 | 10 |
|
> Frank, please don't leave out 1978. I've heard opinions that it was
> even worse than '86 from some circles.
Sumthin' about the day "Bucky @#$%ing Dent" entered all our
vocabularies, as I recall.
You can be cruel, Dan. ;-)
Dave W.
|
29.86 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Thu Mar 07 1991 07:48 | 8 |
| � Frank, please don't leave out 1978. I've heard opinions that it was
� even worse than '86 from some circles.
� Mark, do you remember what happened?
� Dan
Disco died?
|
29.87 | "You can tell by the way /Don used to walk ...." | LUNER::BROOKS | Nah .... tax problems ... | Thu Mar 07 1991 08:12 | 14 |
| Ha ha ha ....
I can just picture The Slasher in his white John Travolta suit with the
bell bottoms and big lapels, getting busy to the beat of the Bee Gees
.... :-)
That's even better than Bob Hunt as M.C. Hammer
Ah Ah Ah .. Stayin' Alive, Stayin' Alive ... Ah Ah Ah .. Stayin' Alive
Stayin' Aliiiiiiiive ....
Them was the days !
Doc
|
29.88 | Doc that was pretty good... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Thu Mar 07 1991 09:38 | 1 |
|
|
29.89 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | A toon trapped in a man's body | Thu Mar 07 1991 09:42 | 19 |
|
I think most long-time hemorredsox sufferers will agree that '86 was
the worst emotionally.
I remember the Halloween dance at the town hall where most of the
attendees left the dance floor and huddled around the few tiny black
and white portables to watch the end of the game. When the game ended,
so then did the party for all intents and purposes. If Poe were to
re-write "The Masque of the Red Death" today, the tragedy and the
horror and disgust of that night would make the plague seem like a
diaper rash.
Even in the seventh game where the Sox took a three run lead, I
couldn't get excited, but just stared at the screen, resigned to the
inevitable. At that point the spirit was just too broken. I had
learned to accept fate in all its ugliness the Saturday night before.
Dickstah
|
29.90 | What happened in '86 Dickster? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Thu Mar 07 1991 11:31 | 1 |
|
|
29.91 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | A toon trapped in a man's body | Thu Mar 07 1991 11:46 | 6 |
|
Slasher, about them 'shrooms you got that wipe away all traces of bad
memories: If you're sellin', I'm buyin'.
Dickstah
|
29.92 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Thu Mar 07 1991 11:59 | 9 |
| Dickstah, you know how they got hypnotists to help you lose weight,
hypnotists to help you quit smoking. Well there now is a hypnotist who
helps you forget memorable Red Sox collapses. Every time you hear Dick
Stockton's voice say "there's a high fly ball headed to right", your mind
goes blank and you start hearing birds chirping, bees buzzing and you get
the feeling of oneness with nature. Same thing happens everytime Bill
Buckner starts to bend down to pick up that slow roller. It's great.
/Don
|
29.93 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | A toon trapped in a man's body | Thu Mar 07 1991 12:58 | 6 |
|
I'll have to give that a try. Nothing like the birds and the bees to
take your mind of the unpleasant.
Dickstah
|
29.94 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | Got into a war with reality ... | Thu Mar 07 1991 16:45 | 12 |
|
RE: .92
"High fly ball to right?" Wasn't Bucky's shot to left or
left-center?
And that was just the icing on the cake for that year.
The Red Sox were ahead of NY by something like 13 or 14
games before they started their "decline".
GTI
|
29.95 | RE .94 See how well it works... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYou | Fri Mar 08 1991 07:44 | 1 |
|
|
29.96 | Is there a "Flatline"to erase bad memories? | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Fri Mar 08 1991 13:21 | 9 |
| '86 takes the cake for this Sox fan. The sheer,savage,shocking slap
in the face during the bottom of the 12th killed me. In '78, you
had a month of gradual agony before the playoff game so you were
kind of expecting the results. I could just kill Schiraldi,Stanley,
Gedman, Buckner, and Johnny Mac.
The visions still remain.
MikeL
|
29.97 | Quality starts.. | ASABET::J_REID | Bart Simpson for Governor | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:05 | 10 |
|
Does anyone have how many quality starts Roger Clemens had last year?
I need it to win a bet...Thanks..
Jim
|
29.98 | | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a warm scrum, mon | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:15 | 41 |
| � '86 takes the cake for this Sox fan. The sheer,savage,shocking slap
I have to agree with this.
In 1975, the Red Sox 7th game loss followed what I feel was the
greatest World Series game ever. Even the questionable non-call
on the interference at the plate wasn't a real bummer once time
healed the wound.
In 1978, the whole last month was a gradual slide. My attitude going
into the game was that there was no way the Sox had the momentum, and
that it would take a miracle to win. When Yaz popped up to lose
the thing, I knew that it just wasn't "meant" to be.
In 1986 however, it was exciting from the time the Sox were down to their
last out against the Angels. I remember working late nights on our
project with a TV right by our desks....
I was in a hotel room in Washington DC, and was watching the 6th game.
The Sox were so close. I remember thinking that I wouldn't know what
to do if they were to win, that it had been so long....
And hey, they didn't give me the chance to find out. I remember sitting
there telling Schiraldi (choke,choke) what our Little League coach used
to tell our pitchers....just get them to hit it on the ground, the infield
will get the job down....
And Stanley and Gedman.... To me, Stanley will forever carry the same
kind of stigma that Chicago Black Sox carried. He blew it. But
Buckner..... Bill Buckner is still a dirty word in my folks house...
How many thousands of ground balls does an infielder handle a year.
How many over the course of a career? And this man will be forever
remembered for the one that went through his legs.
1978 will never be as disappointing for a Sox fan as it is exhilirating
for a Yankees fan... We have our 1986......
'Saw
|
29.99 | Sometimes Red Sox fans are just too much... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:37 | 25 |
|
> And Stanley and Gedman.... To me, Stanley will forever carry the same
> kind of stigma that Chicago Black Sox carried. He blew it. But
> Buckner..... Bill Buckner is still a dirty word in my folks house...
And Buckner stills resides in some kind of fantasy world where he
expects the fans to be completely displaced and objective and to
forget it ever happened (the game was already tied, blah, blah, blah).
Kind of sad, really.
That reminds me of something I read a couple of weeks ago in the Globe
that tells you something about Boston fans and really had me rolling.
Some guy wrote a letter really giving it to Bill Buckner about getting
a life and accepting responsibility and owning up to the fact that he,
not the fans, blew it in that game. It was scathing and pretty long,
and at the bottom, in the spirit of forgiveness, the letter was signed:
Reverend Something Somebody
Boston, MA
Brought tears to my eyes (don't ask me of sadness or joy)!
glenn
|
29.100 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Bart meets Doogie on 'The Symptoms' | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:53 | 7 |
|
Actually, the Boston fans were quite forgiving of Billybuck. After he
had returned to the Sox (last year?) he was given one of the longest
ovations in the opening day introductions.
Dickstah
|
29.101 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Northeastern! What a Team!! | Wed Mar 13 1991 12:49 | 4 |
| Stanley gets the blame for the "wild pitch", but Gedman really
should've had the "passed ball".
/Don
|
29.102 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Bart meets Doogie on 'The Symptoms' | Wed Mar 13 1991 13:38 | 3 |
|
/Don, take some more of those 'shrooms. You're starting to remember!
|
29.104 | | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a warm scrum, mon | Wed Mar 13 1991 14:32 | 10 |
| Slasher,
I don't care how you spread the BLAM. Stanely couldn't throw, and
Gedman couldn't see out of those slits for eyes he has...
Buckner is so old he couldn't bend over, and Johnny Mac...well....
Oh well.....
'Saw
|
29.105 | I Don't Like That Guy | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:23 | 27 |
| Gedman, that big fat pig, missed the ball. Plain and simple. He was
probably planning his next at bat and figuring how to keep his feet on
the ground when he allowed a pitch that was slightly outside and high
to go to the backstop.
Then he and his fat butt waddled back there as Stanley chugged in to
cover home.
People seem to place alot of blame on Stanley due to his lack of
effectiveness in his latyer years. But Stanley was one of the best
relievers in the American League for awhile and actually contributed to
any success the Sox had during his career. He agreed to start, be a
middle reliever and a closer. He did it all and never gave any hokie
excuses. A class act from beginning to end.
But Gedman, that fat pig, has one decent year and holds out for some
huge amount of money. Then he starts swinging a bat like Cloris
Leachman, for heavans' sake. In the event a pitcher hits his fat butt
with a pitch and he gets on base he runs about as fast as George
Kevarian to a closed hot dog stand.
Big Foot was one og my all-time favorites. It really irks me when he
gets blamed for that play when it was really that fat pig, Gedman's
fault.
Rich
|
29.106 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:31 | 4 |
| But Rich, how do you really feel.
Stanley did pretty well in his later years, too. He did some great
pitching down the stretch and in the playoffs in '86.
|
29.107 | Pardon the sarcasm... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:32 | 20 |
|
> Gedman, that big fat pig, missed the ball. Plain and simple. He was
> probably planning his next at bat and figuring how to keep his feet on
> the ground when he allowed a pitch that was slightly outside and high
> to go to the backstop.
Actually, I think it was inside and kind of low, but I still concur
with the opinion.
> But Gedman, that fat pig, has one decent year and holds out for some
> huge amount of money. Then he starts swinging a bat like Cloris
> Leachman, for heavans' sake. In the event a pitcher hits his fat butt
> with a pitch and he gets on base he runs about as fast as George
> Kevarian to a closed hot dog stand.
And there you have it, folks. The opinion of another one of those
glassy-eyed, adoring, rationalizing Red Sox fans. Gotta lov' it!
glenn
|
29.108 | Telephone call for Mr. Brake | NRADM::GALVIN | o..........|||| Candlepins | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:40 | 3 |
| Ring....Ring....Ring
"Hello......Mr. Brake, it's for you. It's Rich Gedman.
|
29.109 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DonKing | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:48 | 1 |
| Hey Rich, are you implying that George Kevarian is slow?
|
29.110 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN! | Thu Mar 21 1991 16:17 | 17 |
| Glenn,
I got the sarcasm, but Sox fans, especially over in the Sox note,
basically stage a love-fest for the team. God forbid anyone with a
differing opinion, as I found out last year after the Clemens/Cooney
fiasco, when so many of those objective, bitter Sox fans saw fit to
send me mail and basically try to run me out of the conference because
I didn't side with Roger (i.e. God).
Glenn, yep, certain players can be criticized - Stanley, Rice, Buckner,
Gedman, sometimes Barrett, Rivera - but not any of the demigods,
especially Roger.
The Sox are alway the underdog, just like the Tarhells are. Makes
rationalizing loses in big games a lot easier.
JD
|
29.111 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Mar 21 1991 16:34 | 30 |
| Wait a minute, JD. I'm older than you, son, and, hence, have been a Sox
fan longer than you've been alive.
And, if I'm pissed at Roger or Wade or Ellis or anybody that I think is
a bonehead, I'll come out and say it.
I used to despise Dwight Evans. The guy pissed me off because he would
hit 20 HR's a year but they would usually come when the Sox were up or
down by 10 runs. And he always seemed to get picked off first. It was
not fashionable to criticize Dewey, "The greatest right fielder in
baseball". Well, I felt then that Winfield was better and still feel I
was correct.
But, to Evans' credit, he ended up with quite a career and I found
myself changing my tune.
As for you, Glenn, I am not starry eyed. You got a problem with my
analysis of that big fat pig, Gedman? Huh?
And while we're at it, how can I forget to castigate John "My nose gets
in the way of the game" MacNamara. Why he didn't put Stapleton in to
play 1B in Game 6 in '86 still puzzles me. He did it all year long yet
he kept the guy who taught Mike Dukakis how to grow one eyebrow glued
to 1B.
And, yes, /Don, I think Kevarian and Gedman in a 100 yard waddle would
be a tough call.
Rich
|
29.113 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Kill me with Cadbury Cream Eggs | Thu Mar 21 1991 16:54 | 11 |
|
George Kevarian once beat Carl Lewis to an *open* hot dog stand.
JD, and when have the Sox ever been the favorite going into the World
Series? In our lifetime, that is.
Rich, I can't really tell if you're serious or not, but that note had
me rolling on the floor.
Dickstah
|
29.114 | Or izzit "Pizza the Hut?" | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Born at the right time | Thu Mar 21 1991 18:17 | 5 |
| JD, give it up. It's not funny anymore.
Rich, speaking of Keverian, whatever happened to Jabba the Hut?
Mark.
|
29.115 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Snuffy'sSeenMoreChokesThanHeimlich | Fri Mar 22 1991 07:34 | 5 |
| Rich, it's obvious you've been out of the state for a while.
George Keverian went on a slimfast diet and has trimmed down to
around 450 lbs. Hey JD how's the beard coming along?
/Don
|
29.116 | | CAM::WAY | Same old, same old, Jimmy Rain... | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:06 | 1 |
| Who is George Kevarian?
|
29.117 | He looks like Eddie Andelmans twin. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:11 | 10 |
|
George Kevarian is the speaker of the house in the Mass. senate.
The man never met a donut he didn't eat, or a hot dog, or a sausage,
or a pizza, a twinkie, a ding dong, an entire turkey, any buffet,
or a baby's arm holding an apple.
The man is an obese pig.
Steve
|
29.118 | | CAM::WAY | Same old, same old, Jimmy Rain... | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:14 | 13 |
| Thanks Steve.
Bill Cibes, the Connecticut State Treasurer is no stranger to the
training table either.
Perhaps we could have a real down home, old fashioned PORK OFF....
Set 'em up like Mr Creasote in Monty Python and see which one
explodes first!
Yeee-haha, it's Friday!
'Saw
|
29.119 | Hello. Domino's? | METS::DERRY | | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:16 | 2 |
| I don't think he's the speaker any longer. Didn't he run for
treasurer or something?
|
29.120 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Born at the right time | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:19 | 4 |
| Yeah Karen, he ran for treasurer and was soundly defeated. He's been
seen doing the McDonald's, Burger King, Wendy's, KFC circuit.
Mark.
|
29.121 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:20 | 8 |
| George was Speaker of the House since 1984. He ran for Treasurer this
past year, coming in second to Bill "The Prince of Darkness" Galvin in
the Democratic Primary. Galvin lost to Joe Malone in the finals.
Keverian had been a long-time legislator from Everett and worked his
way up the leadership ranks.
John
|
29.122 | He heard that treasurer's get free McMuffins. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Fri Mar 22 1991 08:22 | 8 |
|
I'm dyin! HA HA HA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Mr Creosote, that's him!! Just one more cracker....
Steve
|
29.123 | He's supposedly a good guy... too much of a pol, tho | SACT41::ROSS | BobKnight > DeanSmith | Fri Mar 22 1991 09:06 | 3 |
| Howie Carr of the Herald, when referencing the big guy uses:
"George Keverian (DEM: Papa Ginos)"
|
29.124 | | REFINE::ASHE | You're watching 3CP1, All-Russian TV... | Fri Mar 22 1991 09:57 | 1 |
| No, no... it's one more after dinner mint... wafer thin...
|
29.125 | | 7210::MGILBERT | Paul Tsongas for President | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:01 | 4 |
|
A democrat in papa ginos is a true oxymoron. The guy who owns papa
ginos makes Jesse Helms look like a liberal.
|
29.126 | Mass Politics - worst in the nation | LEAF::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:27 | 10 |
| "Chubby George" took over for Tom McGee, beating him in a commitee election
to be Speaker. McGee was a power hungry ignoramus (similar to Bulger [Senate
President]). At the time everyone, including myself, felt it was a good thing.
As time went on, Keverian became a lacky for Dukakis, and they even know in
Conn. how popular the Duke was at the end.
=Bob=
BTW - JD is growing a beard? This I gota see.
|
29.127 | too much | HPSRAD::SANTOS | Bo, get a Pump for your hip | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:33 | 7 |
| I forget who said it but I broke ribs laughing after hearing it.
- How do you balance the Mass. state budget?
- Take George Keverians lunch money for a month.
|
29.128 | Joe Malone was the right choice! | NRADM::GALVIN | o..........|||| Candlepins | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:37 | 8 |
| RE: .121
Hey John, taking shots at my Uncle Billy......Not nice :-)
Only kidding, I am a devoted republican, and no relation to the Prince
of darkness.
RTG
|
29.129 | No no no, I'm quite full, thank you. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:51 | 7 |
|
Thanks Walt! I couldn't quite remeber if it was a cracker or a
mint! too funny..
Steve
|
29.130 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:58 | 9 |
| Mark,
Whattsa matter, a little truth hurt?
Sox fans caint take any criticism at all.
Boo Hoo
JD
|
29.131 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:00 | 3 |
| Please take the Python and Kevarian stuff to the Junk Note. Better
yet, take the Kevarian stuff to NOTED::MASSACHUSETTS. There's plenty
of bitching in there about the state of the state.
|
29.132 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Born at the right time | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:45 | 9 |
| <<< Note 29.130 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Un Rosalind der schplat" >>>
JD, you claim that fans are gushing in the Sox notesfile. If you took
the time to check, you'd have found that the Sox file has been
uncharacteristically quiet over the last several weeks.
Please try to keep up.
Mark.
|
29.133 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Fri Mar 22 1991 12:50 | 8 |
|
re .117
> George Kevarian is the speaker of the house in the Mass. senate.
As I heard a comic say at a club two weeks ago :
"Speaker of the House !? ... He *IS* THE F--KING HOUSE !" :-)
|
29.134 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:12 | 24 |
| Hey JD.....you been drinking too much of your node lately? I don't know
why you still are on the Sox fans' case but it's getting a little
stale.
Loving the Sox is a religeous experience. But, when you look at them
objectively, how can you favor them to win anything? They seldom have
more than 1 or 2 frontline pitchers, have the team speed of the
National Snail Sprint Club, are in the middle of the pack fielding-wise
and have some thick-armed guys who can crank the ball over "Da Wall"
once in awhile. The last time they were favored to win anything big, I
believe, was in 1946 versus the Cardinals. Yet, even then, they had
little for pitching as witnessed by the starting of Denny Galehouse in
the crucial 7th game. Same ole Sox.
Mac, chill out. How can one divorce the Red Sox from Massachusetts
politics? Ole Honey Fitz leading the Royal Rooters, Mayor Curley
offering to buy Landsdowne St and "give" it to Yawkey to extend left
field. It's tradition. And, with the crew of lackies on Beacon Hill in
Mass, it's no wonder that they are targets once in awhile.
Now, with that said, Let's Go Sox!!!!!
Rich
|
29.135 | :^) | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Born at the right time | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:23 | 8 |
| Rich, don't get me wrong. I didn't say *all* Red Sox. Just the vast
majority of them. Remember, I'm a life long Red Sox fan and I'd like
nothing better than to see them win the whole enchilada.
But the constant rah rah, "my team can do no wrong" of the Red Sox
noters is .......
JD
|
29.136 | Awesome | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Mar 22 1991 14:26 | 9 |
| That's good, Mark........it almost worked.
I was all set to lay into JD again, then I saw when you were born and
remembered his Pecs and, I thought better of it.
BTW - Anyone see Luis River's muscles this spring?
Rich
|
29.137 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 15:05 | 37 |
| Rich,
First, my comments in the ACCnote were explained pretty well by Glenn
today. I may not have put them forth too well.
I believe that there's a "We is underdogs" mentality instilled in some
Boston area fans (especially Sox and Broons fans...) Everytime they
win a division its because of overachieving - other teams (especially
teams from LA and New York underachieve, using this logic...)
I think many Sox fans contradict themselves. They'll argue for eons
about how talented their players are, but will then say "Oh woe, our
team doesn't have the talent to win it."
I've seen it *too* many times. I've heard demin-god praise for
Clemens, Burks, Boggs, Reed, Pena, Greenwell - yet the team doesn't
have the talent.
The acquisitions were pooh-poohed. The Sox, in case you haven't
noticed, picked up some good ballplayers. Darwin was slated to be
Houston's #1 man. Jack Clark is a good power man and an RBI man.
What I said this year, which was deemed horrible by so-called Sox fans,
was suggest that IMO, the SOX have at the *LEAST* stayed at the same
talent level as last year, but IMO, have gone up in talent. And given
the fact that these poor, underdog, underachieving, striving for
greatness, boys-town choir boys have *WON* the Eastern Division 3 of
the last 5 years, I had the audacity to say I *EXPECT* them to win the
division, and the pennant, and fell that anything less is a failure and
an underachievement.
You can remain the a perfect Sox fan - always excusing or bitching
about failure, and attributing success to overachievement, but I'll
take a little more objective view and say that the Sox are one of the
best teams in baseball.
JD
|
29.138 | | CAM::WAY | Same old, same old, Jimmy Rain... | Fri Mar 22 1991 15:13 | 8 |
| > noticed, picked up some good ballplayers. Darwin was slated to be
> Houston's #1 man. Jack Clark is a good power man and an RBI man.
Yes. I've heard that Darwin has evolved quite nicely, and could be
the missing link in the Sox rotation. That is if he doesn't wind
up the Beagle in the Dog House.
'Saw
|
29.139 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Mar 22 1991 15:44 | 9 |
| re the last few:
If this year's Red Sox finish first or second in the AL East, they'll
have performed about to expectations. Lower than that has to be
considered disappointing. It would take at least an ALCS win for talk
of "overachieving" to have any merit.
py
|
29.140 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Mar 22 1991 15:50 | 47 |
| JD,
I've been down your road too many times before. I've waited for Opening
Day with baited breath expecting the likes of Dick Gernet, Eddie
Bressoud, Ike Delock, Jim Pagliaroni, Billy Consolo and a cast of
thousands to bring home the banner last cast in 1918. I believed in
those teams. Right up until that fat pig Gedman blew a catch and that
Dukakis-eyebrow Buckner failed to bend over low enough to catch a dinky
grounder.
That's when I figured it out, JD. I had come into so many seasons
trying to make the Sox the best team in baseball in my mind. I made
excuses for 35 years. Now I don't make any excuses. I look at the Sox
with a cynical eye.
Sure, they picked up Clark but who's gonna play shortstop?
Sure, they got Darwin and Young but will they fill Boddicker's shoes?
Who will steal more than 10 bases for them?
Will Mike Greenwell still play left field like Horace Clarke played 2nd
base?
Who will set up Reardon, Murphy?
Will Murphy be a 1990 or 1989 model?
Can we really expect Harris and Kiecker to do what they did last year?
Why is it that Pawtucket has the potential to have a starting infield
with everyone over 30 years old?
Can Mo Vaughan hit a major league curve or is he another Sam Horn?
What happened to Carlos Quintanna's neck?
Be serious here. The Sox are not a lock on anything. They have zero
depth on the bench at 3rd or 2nd base. Naehring is still a rookie and
untested. Romine still your premier outfield bench man? Matt Young and
Danny darwin are question marks. Jack Clark is a distraction and will
piss of Morgan very quickly.
Sorry, JD - too many questions for cynical ole me.
Rich
|
29.141 | Can't get too confidant as a Sox fan.... | DECWET::METZGER | Oh No, I've said too much... | Fri Mar 22 1991 15:55 | 25 |
|
I'd say the Sox stayed even talent wise this off season....
gains were Clark, Darwin and Young (19 losess is a gain)
Losses were Boddicker and Anderson
Some of the players might have had career years last year (Harris,Bolton,Keicker
Gray and QUintana) while others (Greenwell,Brunansky, Boggs) under achieved
compared to previous years.
I'd say that since they won the division last year and no other team has
noticably improved to any extent that they would be the favorites to win the
division this year. I wouldn't consider it overachivement if they do so.
I would consider it underachievement if they don't. Talent wise compared to the
whole of MLB I would consider it a slight overachievement if they win the
whole she-bang but nothing like a '69 Mets team.
I expect great things out of the Sox this year....I anticipate a total
collapse and a 3rd place finish :-(
Metz
|
29.142 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:19 | 6 |
| It was sportwriters and "experts" around the country that picked the
Sox to finish 5th in '86. It's not the Boston fans crowning the Sox as
overachievers. It's all of baseball. Afterall, the Toronto Blue Jays
were supposed to be the dominant team in the A.L. East over the last 5
years. The Sox were supposed to be middle of the pack to contenders
(but not winners) depending on whose column you read.
|
29.143 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:27 | 7 |
| As far as the Bruins go, there is a "perception" that because of the
seemingly large number of injuries they have to overcome every year
that they are lucky to go as far as they do. I do count myself among
that crew but also don't claim to know how their injury rate compares
to the rest of the NHL.
John
|
29.144 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:33 | 49 |
| Rich,
Be as cynical as you want. So can other Sox fans. I'll show some
optimism. If you or other fantastic SOx fans don't like it, tough
cookies.
Losses: Boddicker - I feel Darwin will be an adequate replacement.
Anderson - C'mon, the guy isn't Cy Young, or even Bob Stanley.
IMO this wasn't a super loss.
Barrett - no loss here.
Gains: Jack Clark - Power, RBI's, can play first. Big Gain.
Darwin - will replace BOddicker (who will, IMO, end up with a
worse record than Darwin.
Young - this is a no lose proposition.
Outfield: Greenwell, Burks, and Brunasky. Not bad at all. SO what
about Greenwell's defense - lots of clubs field worse then him - look
at the Dodgers outfield - YIKES.
3B: Boggs - great hitter, and his fielding has been defended to near
death by Sox faithful
SS: Naehring/Rivera - Sox offense can spare having a no hit SS like
Rivera. So what if Naehring is just a rookie - every player was once a
rookie. THat's how they start out.
2B: Jody Reed - again, listening to many Sox fans, this is a premier
ball player.
1b/dh - Clark, Quintana, etc. - Again, good offense, thought there may
be a sligt defensive defeciency.
C: Tony Pena - handles the staff well. Leadership. Good offense.
Pitching: The Sox Fan proclaimed greatest pitcher of all time taking
the mound every 5th day. Darwin a good #2 man. Kiecker and the boys
have a year under their belt. Is Dopson healthy?
Some question marks, but a better staff then they've had in a few
years.
A very good baseball team.
My prediction: SOx win the east. Sox fans say "What a great
overachieving, blue-collar bunch of guys. Beat the overachieving,
media-hyped teams from Toronto. Who would have ever predicted they'd
win the division (insert many pats on back...)"
|
29.145 | So I exaggerate, but not much... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:36 | 12 |
|
Fact is, for every slightly objective Sox fan who's disappointed but
thinks they've done okay *lately*, there're a hundred vindictive
sportswriters, loutish radio talkshow hosts, knee-jerk slobs on the
street and displaced Dan Schneiders who bellow "choke!" the minute
the Sox slip a half-game out of first. The reason I asked JD how
long he lived here was not to question his fanhood now that he's
gone as he presumed, but because I couldn't believe that he had not
observed this phenomenon while he was here.
glenn
|
29.146 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:45 | 24 |
| Glenn,
I did observe the phenon of teh vindictive sportswrites, etc. But I
didn't find it much different from the hype in NY. The papers there
can be mighty cruel on teams and players, as can the fans.
In fact, when I first went to Boston I was amazed how the papers seemed
tame, and that they were always picking the Boston teams to win their
divisions - didn't seem objective at all.
Now, the 78 team choked. No question about it.
I feel that the real phenom in Boston is the double standard used in
talent appraisal - individually, players are praised as the best at
their position, but collectively, they are identified as a band of
average players, banding together to fight large odds, reaching down
and overachieving to win another division title.
Not directed at you, but the real problem is that Many Sox (and Boston
fans) really believe the "Best Sports Fans in the World" propoganda
line they've been spoon-fed, and they also cannot take criticism.
They can dish it out, but they caint take it.
JD
|
29.147 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:50 | 22 |
| OK, let's look at a lineup as follows:
1B - Cecil Cooper
2B - Denny Doyle/Jerry Remy
3B - Butch Hobson
SS - Rick Burleson
LF - Jim Rice (vintage)
CF - Fred Lynn
RF - Dwight Evans
C - Carlton Fisk
You have here a lineup that could blow the SOX off the 1991 edition.
Add Yaz as a DH and you have one of the most potent lineups the Sox
ever had. Yet, they couldn't win the WS. Heck, they only won one
pennant.
I'll root for them till I die but nobody is gonna look at that team and
tell me they are the best in the AL East. Hey, if they win it all, I'll
be happy. If they lose, .....I'm conditioned.
Rich
|
29.148 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Bruinsasaurus | Fri Mar 22 1991 17:09 | 5 |
| re: .143
John,
FYI-The Bruins are leading the NHL in most man hours lost to injuries.
|
29.149 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Mar 26 1991 10:27 | 5 |
| Small blip in the Richmond paper this morning about Wade Boggs escaping
serious injury when he fell out of a moving van. Any details?
Rich
|
29.150 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Mar 26 1991 10:38 | 5 |
| Not really. He and Debbie were driving back from dinner going about 25
MPH, he leaned against the door and it popped open. Got some cuts and
bruises, missed a couple of games.
John
|
29.151 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:54 | 1 |
| And she said "Sh*t, I missed again!"
|
29.152 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Blinded by the Lite | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:56 | 5 |
|
"Wade, look! Is that Margo I see over there on the sidewalk?"
"Wher.....AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
29.153 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Tue Mar 26 1991 13:02 | 3 |
| re .152
HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!
|
29.154 | This scab on my elbow is preventing me from extending... | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Tue Mar 26 1991 14:04 | 4 |
| If Wade gets off to a slow start, you know we'll hear about this
again...
Dan
|
29.155 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Blinded by the Lite | Tue Mar 26 1991 14:08 | 3 |
|
Was this Debbie's way of telling him to "hit the road?"
|
29.156 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 26 1991 14:11 | 3 |
| Wade is hitting .170 in the grapefruit league. I'd say this was a slow
start and it occured before he fell out of the truck. I haven't heard
any excuses yet.
|
29.157 | Take a ridalyn, Wade... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 26 1991 14:51 | 19 |
|
Boggs is a real piece of work, though. You or I or the next guy falls
out of the car in a drunken stupor and the next day at work we're
making up a story about walking into a door, out of embarrassment.
But no, Boggs proceeds to go on about his life flashing before his
eyes and how the incident puts his .170 average into perspective and
the thing turns into a damn melodrama. The press kinda blushes and
grins at all this, nonetheless taking it all in for the next day's
papers while Boggs makes a fool of himself.
Last year it was the night he was held at knifepoint after showing off
his revolver to some strangers outside a bar. Before that, Margo. But
the worst part is that Boggs seems to think that we're all interested
in his exploits, so he wears this stuff like a badge of honor.
This is a strange man, Wade Boggs...
glenn
|
29.158 | MPH as a benchmark | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Tue Mar 26 1991 15:32 | 22 |
| Youse guys got me thinking about Gedman again. Rich, your mention way
back in .104 or so about his fat butt lumbering after the "passed ball/
wild pitch" and his tremendous acceleration down the line makes it
clear to me that we can utilize his speed or lack of as a benchmark.
Lets' make the fat turd famous.
Just as we use a VUP as a measure of performance, we can use Gedman's
time down the line as a base measure of performance( must be close to
1/2 hour)
Let's call it a MPH (Mister Potato Head)
Therefore Rich Gedman has a MPH of one; Ellis Burks must be measured
at least at 15 Mister Potato Heads ( the greater the MPH, the greater
the speed)
Anyone who has a (-) MPH is either designated as dead or living in an
iron lung. (Mike Marshall might be close)
Think of the Gedman MPH as akin to the famous Mendoza line (he of that
famous .188 batting average)
|
29.159 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Rather be trout hunting | Tue Mar 26 1991 15:46 | 3 |
| :^)
Mark.
|
29.161 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:08 | 24 |
| That's it....I just spewed half-eaten peanut M&M's all over my
keyboard!
What a great idea - MPH's.
Let's see, we'll take a look at the starting lineup:
Boggs - 1.5 MPH
Reed - 2.25 MPH
Naehring - 2.5 MPH
Greenwell - 2.0 MPH
Burks - 4.0 MPH
Brunansky - 1.5 MPH
Quintanna - 1.25 MPH
Pena - 1.75 MPH
Clark - 1.5 MPH
Boy, what a bunch of burners. Team MPH must be around 2.0 MPH with some
blazin speed coming off the bench, to boot.
I love it...a lasting tribute to that big fat pig.
Rich
|
29.162 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:11 | 10 |
| My mph?
Probably around .4 MPH. I'm the slowest thing since Heinz ketchup.
I mean, if you want me to run a 100yd sprint, pull the trigger on the
gun, go have a coffee, think about taking a leak, go find the mens'
room, take a leak, go get a coffee refill, and you'll still have time
to hold the tape for me at the finish!
And NO, I'm NOT in an Iron LUng......
|
29.164 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:19 | 4 |
| It may be half baked, but I think if it were voted on the eyes would
have it.....
|
29.165 | Was you moon-walking when tested? | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:21 | 7 |
| Say it ain't so 'Saw!
You cain't be slower than Geddie! Nobody physically can be. Tell me
you ain't below the MPH line! Hath thou been running in quicksand
MikeL
|
29.166 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Tue Mar 26 1991 17:37 | 6 |
|
'Saw,
Does this mean we should time you with a calendar or a sun dial?
Claybroon 8^]
|
29.167 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:31 | 23 |
| I've always been slow. From what I've read about running, the muscle
fibers that make you fast or slow are a mix of two types. All the
studies show it's hereditary.
Now my dad was a superb quarter miler in his time, but I don't guess
I got any speed from him. I take more after my uncle on my mom's
side -- big kind of a guy, excellent lineman material.
I'm not the slowest guy on the rugby team, but fortunately, rugby
is one sport where you don't need to be a speed burner to play
the game. (thank god!) And like Mac has said, knowing the game
allows you to conserve energy and play heads up...
I might be faster than Gedman. I mean, I can see the finish line
better because I don't have slits for eyes...
Maybe this summer we can get Gedman to that track in Northboro.
We can hogtie the WelcherDinz(tm) and get him there too. AFter
Dinz runs around in his jock, then I can race Gedman and we
can determine my MPH.
'Saw
|
29.168 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:31 | 5 |
| 'Saw, Nell Carter can run faster than Gedman. Roseanne Barr can run
faster than Gedman. And, I know you can catch Roseanne Barr....8^)
Rich
|
29.169 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:59 | 6 |
| > 'Saw, Nell Carter can run faster than Gedman. Roseanne Barr can run
> faster than Gedman. And, I know you can catch Roseanne Barr....8^)
Yeah, now that you put it in those terms. Although I'd much rather
catch the lass who plays CJ on LA Law.....;^)
|
29.170 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:36 | 5 |
| Dana Keicker sure has been pitching well in the Grapefruit League. I
think the Sox pitching staff will be fine this year. No doom and gloom
from me.
JD
|
29.171 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:45 | 9 |
| � Dana Keicker sure has been pitching well in the Grapefruit League.
And aren't the Yankees leading the standings in the A.L. Grapefruit
League?
In an interview with Keiker he said he feels bad for guys like Darwin
and Young. With all of the bucks they're making, they will be facing
alot of pressure when they head back north. Meanwhile, with his small
salary increase, he'll be able to enjoy the season more.
|
29.172 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | RedSox: Building momentum since '18 | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:02 | 11 |
|
THIS IS DEFINITELY THE YEAR THE RED SOX WILL GO ALL THE WAY. THE WHOLE
NINE YARDS. THE BIG ONE. THE ENTIRE ENCHILADA. THE KINGDOM AND THE
POWER AND THE GLORY. JOT DOWN THIS NOTE TOPIC AND NUMBER, SO YOU'LL
KNOW WHERE YOU READ IT FIRST. NEVER MIND, I'LL MAKE A NOTE OF IT MYSELF
SO I CAN RE-POST IT IN OCTOBER. SO IT IS WRITTEN. SO LET IT BE DONE.
AMEN.
Dickstah
|
29.173 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:03 | 4 |
|
DICKSTA IS TO BLAM!
|
29.174 | A friend of mine wants to know if the Sox are home April 10-13 | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:10 | 0 |
29.175 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | RedSox: Building momentum since '18 | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:26 | 3 |
|
4/11 is the home opener, 12th off, 13th vs. Cleveland
|
29.176 | | METS::DERRY | | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:26 | 2 |
| Yeah. The Sox are home on the 11th and the 13th, against Cleveland.
Both games start at 1:05.
|
29.177 | Chin Music, Roger's #1 song look out Terry | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Qualified Mentally for HP Parking | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:38 | 6 |
|
and home all of October...
;^)
mike
|
29.178 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | RedSox: Building momentum since '18 | Fri Mar 29 1991 14:48 | 12 |
|
Anybody out there like to have Mike "I'm the best and deserve to play
every game" Marshall? Seems he walked out of spring training,
urinating and lamenting about taking his ball and going home about
not playing every day.
To his credit, though, I believe he *is* leading the Sox in hitting
this spring. Gorman says he's tried to shop him, but nobody seems
interested.
Dickstah
|
29.179 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Rather be trout huntin' | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:00 | 3 |
| He's back in camp today. Says he took a "personal day".
Mark.
|
29.180 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:01 | 2 |
| His wife was arrested after she decided to rearrange the cones in the
parking lot to voice her displeasure over Mike's situation.
|
29.181 | Noone wants him cuz he gots a (-) MPH | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:03 | 1 |
|
|
29.182 | Ken Coleman's great call | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:35 | 7 |
| Here's a spot of trivia.
In April of 1967, we all know that Elston Howard of the Yanks broke
up Billy Rohr's no-hitter. Who was the Yankee that hit the long drive
to left that Yaz went back,dove and made a great catch in order to
preserve the no-hitter at that time?
|
29.183 | Tom Tresh | METS::DERRY | DonnieWahlbergLightsMyFire | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:38 | 1 |
|
|
29.184 | I'll take "The Esophagus" for 100 Alex. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | What the hell is that? | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:43 | 7 |
|
Ooooo Karen your little miss quick trivia for $1000 today aren't you!
8^)
Steve
|
29.185 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Rather be trout huntin' | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:44 | 5 |
| She's got a book handy.
"Cheat, cheat, ne'er beat."
mark.
|
29.186 | /Don should organize the next outing. | METS::DERRY | DonnieWahlbergLightsMyFire | Fri Mar 29 1991 15:50 | 4 |
| I did have to look up the question. That took some effort.
What do I win? Free tix to the next Tigermania? They'd have to be
free if I gotta sit next to REK again.
|
29.187 | Are we on this year or not ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Fri Mar 29 1991 16:06 | 2 |
| If we had gone and did the M-thang like we were supposed to last year
Karen, you wouldn't have been stuck next to REK ..... :-)
|
29.188 | Even tho ya kinda cheated! | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Fri Mar 29 1991 16:10 | 7 |
| Congrats, karen
You win an infinite number of tickets to Hawk's and 'Saw's male strip
show. Bring your barf bag.
MikeL
|
29.189 | | WORDY::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Fri Mar 29 1991 16:25 | 5 |
| Damn - I knew the answer to that off the top of my haid.
I even would have given the prize to Karen.
=Bob=
|
29.190 | | METS::DERRY | DonnieWahlbergLightsMyFire | Fri Mar 29 1991 16:40 | 7 |
| =Bob= - Quick. That's the name of the game.
Okay, here's an easy one. October 2, 1978. What was the count to
Bucky before he hit the homer?
Doc, you never showed at the last one. I woulda been stood up if I'd
have went.
|
29.191 | | FDCV07::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Sun Mar 31 1991 22:07 | 5 |
| C'mon Karen.. I had your brothers rolling in their seats the whole
night.. You are still mad about telling me that JD was a scrawny
little wimp.. :-}
REK
|
29.192 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Apr 01 1991 09:04 | 3 |
| Ellis Burks walked out of camp. No reasons given in the report.
lEe
|
29.193 | try again | GIAMEM::MIOLA | Phantom | Mon Apr 01 1991 09:09 | 6 |
|
April Fool to you too.....
Lou
|
29.194 | I'd never stand you up ... you're the only one 4 me ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:21 | 1 |
| I wuz there on Pats Day ! Ask John, Hawk or /Don !!!!!!
|
29.195 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:41 | 10 |
| Doc WAS there on PATS day. He had his camera, and was gonna ask
me to hold it until he realized the high state of inebriation that
I was in at the time. I think I remember him asking my brother
to hold it.
I was faced, and had the time of my life, but I remember that
Doc WAS there on Pats day.....
'Saw
|
29.196 | | METS::DERRY | Jane's Addiction in...Fitchburg?! | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:51 | 8 |
| I'm thinking about organizing the next Tigermania and I'll let
you know Friday if my plastic can swing it.
Yeah, that's all fine and good but it wasn't the Pats day game that
were were supposed to do it at. I could swear it was to have been
at the last Tigermania. (The one where Frank was sweating buckets.)
Might be wrong... it's happened before.
|
29.197 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:58 | 10 |
| > at the last Tigermania. (The one where Frank was sweating buckets.)
I was not sweating buckets.
I was sweating like a man on Drugs....8^)
'Saw
|
29.199 | This year's Pats day? | COGITO::HILL | | Mon Apr 01 1991 11:36 | 5 |
| Sooo, Speaking of Pats Day, who will be there this year? I have tickets
in the grandstand, but if there's a group going to the game, I'd definitely
be up for meeting youze for a few hunderd bee-uhs. The Rat?
Tom
|
29.200 | I'll be at the Rat just before the bartender. | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Apr 01 1991 11:49 | 0 |
29.202 | | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Mon Apr 01 1991 12:02 | 11 |
| Tom,
Look for the guy in the rugby t-shirt, with a PropButt(tm).
If Mac doesn't wear a rugby t-shirt, then it's 100% chance it's
the Chainsaw.
Otherwise, you're looking at 50-50 that it's me....
'Saw
|
29.203 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 01 1991 12:16 | 4 |
| I'm going and I may have an extra ticket. Send me mail if interested
(Lufay?).
John
|
29.204 | To the tune of "Take mE out to the Ballgame" | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot! | Mon Apr 01 1991 14:45 | 12 |
| Take me out to the bleachers
Meet me early in the Rat
Buy me some beers and sportsrooms(tm)
I don't care if Hawks got no hair
Cuz its BLAM BLAM BLAM
On the Sportsters
I they don't get faced, they wear dockers
Cuz its Saw, Ninja, and /DOn
at the nexted ballgame...
|
29.205 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:30 | 14 |
| John, I'm interested in that ticket.
Walt, I need a best man ... are you interested ?
Hawk, would you serve as chaplain ?
John_H, will you bring a BIll James Abstract to serve in place of a
Bible ?
Saw, will you be the bridesmaid ?
:-)
Doc
|
29.206 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:39 | 9 |
| I'll know for sure by mid-week. After that, I've sort of offered it to
Lufay first if he's interested, then if neither person takes it Doc,
it's yours.
The Bill James Abstract hasn't been printed in a couple of years.
Since I sort of work with them, I'll bring a 1991 Elias Analyst. Might
as well help keep my friends in business.
John
|
29.207 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Don Henley must die | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:42 | 6 |
| Sorry, John. I mentioned to Hawk that I'm goin' a fishin', so I cain't
make the game. I just assumed he told you.
Thanks for the offer.
Mark.
|
29.208 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:42 | 1 |
| You're a real pal Ninja ! :-)
|
29.209 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:50 | 4 |
| Lufay, Hawk didn't tell me. Sorry you cain't be there. Doc, you move
to the top of the waiting list and I'll let you know midweek.
Ninj
|
29.210 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Bert Campanaris? | Tue Apr 02 1991 02:12 | 12 |
| I'd take a ticket...
Mo Vaughn got sent down... SHOCK!!! I bet he's up after the amount of
time needed to extend a year of arbitration.
Rob Murphy got traded to Seattle...
To quote a commercial Doc, "No my brother, you have to buy your
own..." I'll come on the white horse (watch it Dickster) and
sweep Karen away at the last minute....
-Walt
|
29.211 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Been dealt a pretty good hand | Tue Apr 02 1991 09:56 | 13 |
| Walt, you always did have a hankerin' for horses.
Anyway, I'm not disappointed at Vaughn being sent down. He's too
valuable a commodity to have sitting on the pine for the first 6 weeks
of the season. He admitted himself that he got off on a slow start and
felt he deserved to be sent down. He also said he'd be back soon
<insert Arnold's voice-over here). He'll tear up the International
League for a month or two and should be up by early June.
Now, if Vaughn got off to a monster spring training, then I'd say yeah
to the arbitration tactic, but not this time.
Mark.
|
29.212 | Where is everyone??!! | METS::DERRY | Jane's Addiction in...Fitchburg?! | Mon Apr 08 1991 15:32 | 6 |
| Sox up 5-1. Jack Clark hit a grand slam.
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
from the Grateful Dead file.
Gotta love baseball.
|
29.213 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Apr 08 1991 15:46 | 12 |
| >> You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
>> from the Grateful Dead file.
Everyone's in the RED_SOX conference, where they've received instructions on
how to get onto the distribution list for updates.
BTW, end of 5:
Toronto 1-4-0
Boston 5-4-0
Clemens has 5 strikeouts.
|
29.214 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Mon Apr 08 1991 15:48 | 10 |
|
> You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
> from the Grateful Dead file.
Imagine! People trying to discuss a serious subject like the Dead
and other people jumping in with Red Sox clutter! It's a good thing
people don't do that in *this* file. 8*)
Dickstah
|
29.215 | Yowza!! | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Then Came Bronson | Mon Apr 08 1991 16:55 | 3 |
| It's OVER! SOx up 5-1 - the champeenship is RIGHT around the CORNER!
JD
|
29.216 | (:^) | ECAMV3::JACOB | HEY, gimme back my hair!!!!! | Mon Apr 08 1991 17:01 | 6 |
| Lessee, Clemens will go, say, 21-6 this year, that coupled with a few
other wins will make the Soxx 26-136 this year, and they'll take second
in the ALeast.
JaKe
|
29.217 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Apr 09 1991 07:08 | 3 |
| No way, JaKe, no way with Jack Clark now on a 648 RBI pace! :*)
lEe
|
29.218 | 162 HRs too! | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Apr 09 1991 07:27 | 2 |
| Been listening to Eddie Anvilhead, eh lEe?
Denny
|
29.219 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThoseBallsAndStrikesAddUpFast | Tue Apr 09 1991 10:46 | 4 |
| Jack Clark is Gawd! The Sox are going all the way. Is it to
early to order ALCS and World Series tickets?
/Don
|
29.220 | REDSOX conference? | CADSYS::CAVE | | Tue Apr 09 1991 10:57 | 5 |
| COuld someone tell me the name of the REDSOX conference. I somehow lost
it in the shuffle.
thanks, Alan
|
29.221 | VAXWRK::RED_SOX | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 09 1991 11:06 | 1 |
|
|
29.222 | Shufflin' Along | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Apr 09 1991 11:46 | 3 |
| Was that the "World Series Shuffle", kinda like the Superbowl Shuffle?
lEe :*)
|
29.223 | And this is a worst-case scenario! ;-) | WORDY::NAZZARO | Pursue, capture, incarcerate | Tue Apr 09 1991 12:23 | 14 |
| Roger Clemens goes 31-2.
Matt Young goes 19-10.
Danny Darwin goes 22-6.
Tom Bolton undefeated at 17-0.
Greg Harris is 12-3, but gets injured. Dana Kiecker replaces
him in the rotation and goes 10-4.
Bullpen = 19-7.
Red Sox overall record = 130-32.
PENNANT FEVER SWEEP HUB!
NAZZ
|
29.224 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan's daddy | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:13 | 6 |
| > Was that the "World Series Shuffle", kinda like the Superbowl Shuffle?
Nah, more like the Curly Shuffle. :-)
py
|
29.225 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:38 | 7 |
|
A fair projection, Nazz, but how do you see the Red Sox losing 32 games
this year? Are the umps that much against them? Anything less than
undefeated is a choke job. 8^))).
Dickstah
|
29.226 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:49 | 15 |
| � <<< Note 29.223 by WORDY::NAZZARO "Pursue, capture, incarcerate" >>>
� -< And this is a worst-case scenario! ;-) >-
I'm rollin`
SOMEBODY GET A NET!
NAZZ HAS FALLEN, AND HE CAIN'T GET IT UP! ... uh... I mean... get up.
Mike JN
132-32!!!!!
Good Grief!
Admittedly the Bloody Sox are the best of a weak division
How `bout 103 - 61 ????
|
29.227 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Digging for fire | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:52 | 6 |
| > How `bout 103 - 61 ????
Why the 2 game playoff?
Mark.
|
29.228 | ???? | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nancy Says: Domedomedoooo | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:05 | 3 |
| Are the Sox in town July 13,14,15,15,17???????
JD
|
29.229 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:19 | 4 |
|
Yes, if your town happens to be in Minneapolis (or thereabouts) or
Chicago.
|
29.230 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Digging for fire | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:20 | 4 |
| Negative, Sarge. In Minny on the 13th and 14th. In Chi-town the 15th
through the 17th.
Mark.
|
29.231 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:25 | 5 |
| All-Star break is July 8-10. Nearest home game before the 13th is the
7th against Detroit. Nearest home game after the 17th is on the 18th
against the Twins.
Ninj
|
29.232 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Nancy sez: Stop spreading the news | Tue Apr 09 1991 14:31 | 3 |
| When is the Fayster supposed to rule on Clemens?
Mark.
|
29.233 | To dream, the impossible dream, to ..... | WORDY::NAZZARO | Pursue, capture, incarcerate | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:07 | 8 |
| Thought I should be conservative in my prediction.
Please note that I even figured in an injury factor (although
not to Roger of course, since he's superhuman).
HTH,
NAZZ
|
29.234 | JACK CLARK BREAKS WIND - PARADE IN OCTOBER !!! | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:21 | 1 |
|
|
29.235 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThoseBallsAndStrikesAddUpFast | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:27 | 5 |
| Doc, if that's the result of Clark breaking wind then I'm sure
we could get up a collection amongst Red Sox fans to give Jack a
seasonal pass to Taco Bell.
/Don
|
29.236 | Clark - A great hitter, but a leader ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:34 | 11 |
| Hey, go for it. It jut cracks me up how Sox fans seize on a savior
every year .... Pena last year for his leadership. This year it's
Clark, who is supposed to be a clubhouse leader, and long-ball threat.
I can see half of that ... but this guy has also been a pain in the ass
in SF, StL, and San Diego last year. If Jim Rice showed 10% of the
'leadership' Clark did in SD last year, he'd been shot.
Sox fans had better hope Clark hits 30 HR's (likely), and doesn't P.O.
too many people (a crapshoot) ....
Doc
|
29.237 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:39 | 10 |
| Hey Doc, Pe�a was the leader last year - and he and Clemens led them to
the ALCS. I haven't heard anything about the Sox or their fans looking
to Clark for leadership. They're just looking for a DH with power.
Sox fans are used to sullen power hitters. Mike Marshall should help
divert attention from any attitude problems Clark may have.
FWIW, Jack got off on the right foot yesterday, and not just by hitting
the grand slam. When asked after the game about him and Clemens
sharing the spotlight he said that the whole team contributed to the
win and that with this team there'll be a different hero everyday.
|
29.238 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Ceaser,U.S.Grant,Patton,JackClark | Tue Apr 09 1991 15:44 | 2 |
|
|
29.239 | "No can hit curve ball. Bats are afraid." | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan's daddy | Tue Apr 09 1991 17:27 | 9 |
| > Sox fans had better hope Clark hits 30 HR's (likely), and doesn't P.O.
> too many people (a crapshoot) ....
...and that AL pitchers take a while to realize that Clark is to the
Red Sox what Pedro Cerrano was to the Indians in the movie "Major
League".
py
|
29.240 | Good movie | EARRTH::BROOKS | Lip reading, New Taxes, Kurds :-( | Tue Apr 09 1991 18:10 | 3 |
| "I say f--- you Jo-Boo, I'll do it myself !"
He was too funny !!!!
|
29.241 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Apr 10 1991 07:52 | 8 |
| Doc, where is this stuff about Clark being the new leader? In the Sox
file? I really haven't seen it in here, but I admit I've done an awful
lot of skipping due to being out a few days, and the slow response time
I've experienced with CAM.
Lee
|
29.242 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Wed Apr 10 1991 09:44 | 14 |
| > lot of skipping due to being out a few days, and the slow response time
> I've experienced with CAM.
Slow response time is due to network problems north of us. Unfortunately
we've been on our backup line a lot, and all of our outside access
is slow.
Plus, from what I've heard, there's some political stuff surrounding these
problems, so it's anyone's guess when it will all work out.....
'Saw
|
29.243 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Wed Apr 10 1991 09:58 | 9 |
|
THE RED SOX PICK UP ALL THESE GREAT PLAYERS AND SIGN THEM FOR TWICE THE
NATIONAL DEBT AND WHAT ARE THEY DOING? THEY ARE PLAYING .500 BALL,
THAT'S WHAT!
T'ROW DA BUMS OUT!!!
Dickstah
|
29.244 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Sox fans back to earth, film @ 11 | Wed Apr 10 1991 10:03 | 2 |
|
|
29.245 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Edsels,Ishtar,DrM,'91RedSox | Wed Apr 10 1991 10:54 | 4 |
| The Red Sox STINK! Trade everybody on the team! Fire the manager!
What's the number for the Skydome ticket office?
/Don
|
29.246 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Wed Apr 10 1991 10:55 | 4 |
| <<< Note 29.245 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Edsels,Ishtar,DrM,'91RedSox" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Don't forget the Rainbow, Pro300 etc etc etc....
|
29.247 | let's not forget the Lynx either :*( | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Wed Apr 10 1991 13:12 | 8 |
| They made howmany? ~128 units
...and sold ~78!!!!
2+ years in development????
|
29.248 | Up there with Kapri? | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Ralph Carter? | Wed Apr 10 1991 15:20 | 3 |
| Re: Lynx
We had one of those, tested most of it once the product was shipped.
Great deal, can we have our test unit back?
|
29.249 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Apr 11 1991 07:46 | 6 |
| Well, the Sox are now 1 for 3 on the road, but *UNDEFEATED* at home!
Projecting this out results in 27 wins away, 81 at home for a .666
winning percentage! :*)
lEe
|
29.250 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Apr 11 1991 08:15 | 2 |
| And clark's down to a mere 54 HRs already!
Denny
|
29.251 | What a bunch of bums! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Apr 11 1991 08:52 | 1 |
|
|
29.252 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Thu Apr 11 1991 09:55 | 1 |
| As usual Morgan left in pitcher in just a tad too long last night....DUH!
|
29.253 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Thu Apr 11 1991 12:43 | 10 |
| Isn't it also true that they are one for three on the road.... and
haven't won a game at home?
(just trying to help)
Wasn't that Stottlemyer, who pitched for the Jays the son of the guy
that pitched for the Yanks? And back in 70? 71? he traded his wife,
house, kids, cars, for another pitcher's wife, house, kids, cars? Guy
named Kechik, or Kechim, or somethink like that?
Mike JN
|
29.254 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Thu Apr 11 1991 12:46 | 11 |
| Well,
So far this season, I'd say Gray is holding the Caterer's Award....
If I could serve up meatballs like that, I'd be a chef in the city,
not a software engineer.....
And Morgan...was he asleep again? Yeah, I know, I know, I saw him walking
around in the dugout, but that doesn't mean he wasn't asleep.....
'Saw
|
29.255 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan's daddy | Thu Apr 11 1991 12:57 | 9 |
| re Mike JN:
Yes, Todd Stottlemyre is Mel's son.
The two Yankees who were involved in the wife-swapping incident were
Fritz Peterson and Mike Kekich(sp?).
py
|
29.256 | A babe to be named later ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | New World Order = Business As Usual | Thu Apr 11 1991 13:17 | 1 |
| How bout some details ....
|
29.257 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Apr 11 1991 13:30 | 3 |
| You mean Todd traded his mother? For who? :*)
lEe
|
29.258 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Willin' | Thu Apr 11 1991 13:57 | 3 |
| A MTBNL.
Mark.
|
29.259 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Time for a Witness | Thu Apr 18 1991 17:41 | 4 |
| Clemens shuts down KC, 1-0. Saberhagen gives up an unearned run.
Reardon with the save.
Mark.
|
29.260 | Surprised no one commented on the CLEMONS/SWIDELL! matchup Saturday... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 18 1991 17:44 | 7 |
|
Clemens' ERA now stands at 0.36 after three starts and three wins.
No one's going to convince me that he's not the best pitcher in
baseball. Clemens is GOD!
glenn
|
29.261 | Roger certainly earning his $$$ so far | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan's daddy | Thu Apr 18 1991 17:49 | 4 |
| Actually Clemens had an off day today. He walked a batter.
py
|
29.262 | Who says all he can do is pitch ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Working For The Clampdown | Thu Apr 18 1991 22:15 | 6 |
| Yep, and he got himself indicted or charged or arraigned or whatever,
too, for the bar brawl incident from a few months back.
Quite a fun-filled couple of days for the Rocket Man.
Bob Hunt
|
29.263 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Apr 18 1991 23:48 | 2 |
| 'Psycho' Lyons is back wif the Sox!
Denny
|
29.264 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Tomorrow People, where is your past? | Fri Apr 19 1991 09:27 | 7 |
| Glenn, you bet your bottom dollar that when Clemens has an inevitable
slump, the naysayers will be here in force.
Bob, actually Clemens was indicted on a lesser charge - hindering arrest
(misdemeaner) rather than assaulting a police officer (felony).
Mark.
|
29.265 | just laying in the weeds awaiting..it'll happen, it's a given | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Yesterday, we'll it seemed so cool... | Fri Apr 19 1991 10:21 | 4 |
|
"what you talkin' about Willis...I mean Mark".... ;^)
mike
|
29.266 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Yesterday, well it seemed so cool... | Fri Apr 19 1991 11:25 | 6 |
|
Another thing about his "highness"' fast start. The umps are giving him
a strike zone slight smaller than the Atlantic Ocean so as not to give
his "highness" more ammo in his upcoming appeal with Fay...
mike
|
29.267 | Yawn | SALEM::DODA | Weather'sHere,WishUWereBeautiful | Fri Apr 19 1991 11:32 | 4 |
| Yeah, those those opposing hitters are intentionally swinging and
missing too....
daryll
|
29.268 | forced too | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Yesterday, well it seemed so cool... | Fri Apr 19 1991 11:51 | 5 |
|
What choice do they have Daryll? They know the ump isn't going to give them
a fair shake...
mike
|
29.269 | Roger :== Demi-god Swindell is too BLAM(tm) | WFOV11::MORRISON | That was just a dream. | Fri Apr 19 1991 11:59 | 5 |
|
I see Mike is wielding the BIG spoon again. Stir that pot!
Bull~
|
29.270 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:03 | 13 |
| � Yeah, those those opposing hitters are intentionally swinging and
� missing too....
Be fair, daryll. If you were a batter, and you knew the ump was going
to call the K if the ball was anywhere in the general vicinity of the
plate, you'd swing, too, and at least go down swinging.... or make them
throw you out if you connected.
(I've seen Roger's catcher dig his mitt into the chalk of the batter's
box opposite the batter in order to stop the ball, and have the ump
call a strike).
Mike JN
|
29.271 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:06 | 2 |
| Hey you whineykisseyfaces ROGER CLEMENS is 3-0 against Bret
Saberhagen.
|
29.272 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:06 | 5 |
| Yeah, the guys a bum. The Umps are scared of him. The Sox ought to
trade him. That's the ticket, send him to ah, um, er, Detroit. Yeah,
Detroit.
lEe
|
29.273 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:21 | 10 |
|
� Hey you perceptive sports analysts. ROGER CLEMENS is 3-0 against Bret
� Saberhagen.
Slasher
My point exactedly! Bret is the better pitcher. Thanks for helping out.
MIke JN
|
29.274 | Fraud! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:24 | 1 |
|
|
29.275 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:38 | 1 |
| Brett evun wun too Sigh Jungs!!!
|
29.276 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | A who a say dere ain't no Jah? | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:40 | 3 |
| Yeah Slasher, but what's Roger's record against Mr. Stewart?
Mark.
|
29.277 | Mark, you mean the guy who makes those microwave pizzas? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:44 | 1 |
|
|
29.278 | | WFOV11::MORRISON | That was just a dream. | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:58 | 5 |
| No, I think he means Jimmy Stewart. As far as I know, Roger never
faced Monty Stratton :^>
Bull~
|
29.279 | Beyond belief | SALEM::DODA | Weather'sHere,WishUWereBeautiful | Fri Apr 19 1991 16:05 | 18 |
| How's the song? "Stretch the truth till it snapped?"
You guys are gettin' there.
Yessir, Roger's got the whole umpires association in his right
pocket. Owns 'em...
And all it took was a few choice words last fall.
Pretty soon, guys like Leary and Davis will be swearing up a
storm and callin' all those umps real nastly names so they can
git this preferential treatment too...
Listen to yourselves for pete's sake.
Get a grip.
daryll
|
29.280 | Sure, I'll go along with it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Apr 19 1991 16:33 | 22 |
|
Daryll, I may be wrong, but I'm just assuming that these guys are
being facetious to stir things up. Doesn't really matter either way.
I do know that in the 6-8 starts I see Clemens pitch a year from my
seat in dead centerfield, there's no evidence of preferential
treatment, just great control. It's tougher to get a true measure of
balls and strikes on TV because the outfield camera angles are almost
always to the right of the pitcher ('cept that beautiful SkyDome
overhead shot), but being there is to see what it's all about.
It's also funny how all those opposing players, being the fierce
competitors that they are, just trudge back to the dugout with their
eyes lowered after Roger punches them out, and then proceed to
deliver all those somber but respectful praises to him in the
lockerroom aftermath. I suppose it's all just part of the game, paying
the mandatory respects to the pampered star for the good of the game.
They wouldn't want to be critical of Clemens or the umpires after one
of his masterpieces, or the commissioner wouldn't like it, and
somebody's pay might get cut or something.
glenn
|
29.281 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Apr 19 1991 16:58 | 6 |
|
re: .264
Mark, you're just sticking up for Roger because you both drive
Volvo's!
|
29.282 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | A who a say dere ain't no Jah? | Fri Apr 19 1991 17:08 | 8 |
| Groaner, my car was made in the same country as your yuppie Prelude.
Hope this hurts.
BTW, I hope my new nephew keeps you up at night when warmer weather
requires an open window at night.
Mark.
|
29.283 | | UPWARD::HEISER | yenom ruoy em dneS | Fri Apr 19 1991 17:22 | 1 |
| I drive a big burley Suburban. A Man's Truck!
|
29.284 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Fri Apr 19 1991 17:29 | 9 |
| Re the Suburban:
Alright. I find the Suburban a tad long to handle easily around
town, which is why I chose my mid-size pickup, but GMC makes great
trucks......
Manly, yes!
'Saw
|
29.285 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Apr 19 1991 17:51 | 4 |
| >> I drive a big burley Suburban. A Man's Truck!
They let you buy it anyway, Mike?
|
29.286 | just say no to yuppies | ZEMI::HEISER | yenom ruoy em dneS | Mon Apr 22 1991 13:55 | 3 |
| >They let you buy it anyway, Mike?
That says a lot since I own one and you don't.
|
29.287 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Mon Apr 22 1991 14:08 | 8 |
| I find it difficult to believe that any real SPORTS Noters would be
DRIVING Yuppie type, Quiche biting, foreign vehicles; let alone
actually OWN one.
I have to assume it's a mistake, and they'll be getting a Manly car as
soon as possible.
Mike JN
|
29.288 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Mon Apr 22 1991 14:43 | 7 |
| Agreed Mike JN....
If it don't say Ford, Chevy, Dodge or GMC, it ain' worth bein' in.
If it ain' got 4 Wheel Drive, you'd better have a good reason why too....
Hope this helps,
'Saw
|
29.289 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Graphic sexual innuendo | Mon Apr 22 1991 14:45 | 6 |
|
Is a company-owned Ford Taurus with the paint peeling off from the
Arizona sun manly? It's DARK blue, and I figure that's gotta be manly
in Phoenix.
Bruce
|
29.290 | | CAM::WAY | Only thing better 'n rucking is... | Mon Apr 22 1991 14:59 | 22 |
| Manly, Bruce, very manly.
However, there are some rules to be followed when driving a company car.
First, keep a crash helmet on the front seat. When you get into those
"situations" with other cars where you're vying for space, put it on.
It lets people know you're serious.
Second, never miss an opportunity to try to ram that car into the smallest
possible space. Yell out the window "Outta my way, this is a COMPANY car!"
and you'll be surprised at the success you have....
Finally, install automatic door openers on all four doors. When you're
in a position to block other cars from sneaking up beside you, flip all
the doors open. Your car can double it's "area" that way, and take up
more space.
Finally, go everywhere as fast as possible, in as low a gear as possible.
Hope this helps,
'Saw
|
29.292 | | WAYBAK::LEFEBVRE | Everybody knows this is nowhere | Mon Apr 22 1991 20:11 | 6 |
| Don't *ever* mention 'zero defects' and Ford, Chevy or GMC in the
same note *ever* again.
Mark.
|
29.293 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Tue Apr 23 1991 13:02 | 8 |
| Hiya Bruce. I thought I saw you on Donohue the other day when
he was discussing the World Cup. Was that you? 8^o
Sox are rolling. Ellis Burks is GAWD! For this week anyway!
Read my lips - "ROGER didn't lie, Cooney did!" When do the World
Series tickets go on sale?
/Don
|
29.294 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Graphic sexual innuendo | Tue Apr 23 1991 13:26 | 29 |
|
Sorry guys, I've been working hard. You see, the company has this
*GREAT* incentive trip for us sales guys. If we work REAL hard and
make about 200% of our quota, we get to go to Palm Springs. WOW!!
Imagine getting a chance to rub elbows with the only Boknows who isn't
on crutches. As you can imagine, after moving to Phoenix I'm really
motiviated to work hard so I can spend a week in a desert with a bunch
of geriatics in golf carts. And no, if you don't make your quota, you
don't get two weeks in P.S.
Now about this Clemens thing, I think Mike Childs is onto something,
only it's much bigger than we all thought. I believe it has to do with
the NEw World Order and the Trilateral Commission. I believe Roger
Clemens is a central character in the biggest conspiracy ever (and
don't forget, I'm the guy who uncovered that Doc is a Celtic fan). See
if this makes sense:
Roger and the umps, as we all know, are in cahoots. The umps have
given Roger a strike zone half the size of 'saw's butt (were talking
BIG). When the batters realize that they have this "cheeky" strike
zone, they naturally become despondent and lethagic, and just give up.
Soon everyone on television will be watching our heroes, playing our
NATIONAL pastime being despondent and lethargic. This is just what
Roger, George Bush, and Gorby want. We will have no choice but to
subconsciously emulate our heroes, so that we too, become despondent
and lethargic. Once this happens the New World Order can EASILY be put
into place as none of us will care anymore. Kinda scary, huh?
Bruce
|
29.295 | Time to break out the spoon | WFOVX8::MORRISON | That was just a dream. | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:00 | 12 |
| I know it's only 2 weeks into the season, but I might as well
try and stir things up.
How long do you bat a .250 hitter lead-off and a .100 hitter
second? Shouldn't some thought be given to a little lineup change?
Sure, Wade went 2 fer 3 last night and sure the Sox have won 5 in
a row, but they're wasting Greenwell's .290+ average by having no
one on base in front of him. The win streak are due to suprisingly
good pitching and timely hitting from the middle of the line-up.
Bull~
|
29.296 | if you believe the conspiracy | ZEMI::HEISER | JCM 900 rules! | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:39 | 4 |
| > only it's much bigger than we all thought. I believe it has to do with
> the NEw World Order and the Trilateral Commission. I believe Roger
...and don't forget the Illuminati.
|
29.297 | Can't believe everything you read... | COGITO::HILL | | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:51 | 4 |
| Don't believe a word of it. It's all Neo-Fascist Dogma, designed to
undermine the very value system, nay, the very essence of what it means
to be a 'mercan. If you do fall for this, you might as well buy a pair
of season tickets for the Exit 16W Nets....
|
29.298 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:58 | 7 |
| Waitaminute ... I thought there was a Vatican-Mafia connection, at least
with the AL. The National League has a simular set up with the
Trilateral Commission, the Yakuza (I hear Bruce is well-connected there
- helps to have those Bay Area roots huh ?), and a possible, but
tenuous link with the Medialian Drug Cartel ....
|
29.299 | | CAM::WAY | I believe I'll dust my broom... | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:18 | 3 |
| Actually, it's all those people who decided to read Dianetics, or Diuretics,
or whatever it's called....
|
29.300 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | When it matters, Dean never wins | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:33 | 9 |
|
But Bull, if there were guys in front of him on base Greenwall would be
hitting 150 not 290 so the choice is obvious. Let Greeenwall hit 290
cause they're overpaying him....
when does my idol pitch nexted?
mike
|
29.301 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | QuicheLorraine,Soccer,Boating | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:45 | 4 |
| Tonight Mike. You got your official ROGER CLEMENS Bosco glass
all set?
/Don
|
29.302 | Childs Knows, .... well, not SPORTS! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:53 | 7 |
| It pleases me to no end to realize that one of Dean's biggest bashers
also thinks Roger Clemens is a stiff!
Haw haw!!!
- ACC Chris
|
29.303 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Graphic sexual innuendo | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:18 | 5 |
|
Actually, the Mafia-Vatican connection comes in from another direction.
Consider this: Clemens is from Texas, JFK was shot in Texas. Everyone
knows the CIA and the Mafia are the ones who shot JFK. Coincidence? I
think not! Clemens was the 2nd gunman on the grassy knoll.
|
29.304 | let us not forget they both whine like babies and choke | CNTROL::CHILDS | When it matters, Dean never wins | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:29 | 8 |
|
Never said he was a stiff Chris, just overrated, over pampered, and above
criticism just like Deano...
oh I forgot both are poor misunderstood souls who are unfair attacked by
mere mortals like myself....
mike
|
29.305 | Your hero. | METS::DERRY | Check's in the mail, eh? | Wed Apr 24 1991 08:11 | 4 |
| Mikey, I knew it was only a matter of time before you came around...
Rog - 4-0. 30 scoreless innings... 7 k's, 0.28 ERA. He wasn't even
"on" lasted night.
|
29.306 | And the OTHER chump Boggs, hit his 3rd homer | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Apr 24 1991 08:13 | 6 |
| 4-0 (2 against the Blue Jays), 1 earned run in four starts, 0.28 ERA,
30 consecutive scoreless innings. As I've said before Mike, you're
watching a HOFer and you can't even bring yourself to appreciate his
greatness.
Steve
|
29.307 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Apr 24 1991 08:14 | 4 |
| Whatever, Roger won again last night. Sox in sole posession of 1st
place right now.
lEe
|
29.308 | major league :))))) | COBRA::DINSMORE | What ever happened to Bill Duggleby? | Wed Apr 24 1991 08:31 | 9 |
| Lee,
Are you a sox fan now? Just curious, anyways, wave the pennent
flags folks the sox are in first, and its already april!
dinz
|
29.309 | | WFOV12::MORRISON | That was just a dream. | Wed Apr 24 1991 08:36 | 11 |
|
BTW, before I become as misunderstood as "God" & Deano, I'm a Sox
fan and I'm not trying to bash any players. Just asking a fairly
obvious question.
Sure it was just a matter of time before Wade started hitting, but
how long should Turnpike Joe have waited before doing something?
Bull~
|
29.310 | The cella dwella's! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Apr 24 1991 09:26 | 10 |
|
Dinzee you still rooting for that sorry excuse of a ball club, the Skanks?
Tsk..tsk..tsk.. those who live in glass houses and all that other malarkey.
GO RANGERS! HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Steve
|
29.311 | | CAM::WAY | I believe I'll dust my broom... | Wed Apr 24 1991 09:41 | 9 |
| Well, I for one am very pleased at the way Roger is performing this year.
The man wanted more money, got it, and now is filling the bill. Regardless
of what anyone else thinks about him, I think he's a great pitcher.
And what's with Wade Boggs and the home runs. Do you think Wade transfered
his sex addiction to a steroid addiction? 8^)
'saw
|
29.312 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | What ever happened to Bill Duggleby? | Wed Apr 24 1991 09:41 | 4 |
| hi digger,
just having some fun, you know my style by now.. ha..
|
29.313 | HOF a non-factor according to Mr. Childs | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Apr 24 1991 10:36 | 11 |
| > As I've said before Mike, you're watching a HOFer and you can't
> even bring yourself to appreciate his greatness.
Heck Steve, Mike watches a *current* HOFer all the time (Dean Smith)
and bashes on him ceaselessly. You don't expect Clemens to get
different treatment just cause he's destined for Cooperstown, do ya?
Ha!
- ACC Chris
|
29.314 | | 7210::MGILBERT | Paul Tsongas for President | Wed Apr 24 1991 11:36 | 10 |
|
RE: .303
Bruce must believe in reincarnation. If memory serves me correctly
Roger wasn't even born when JFK was shot. He might have been a twinkle
in his mother's eye though.
But it's a nice theory Bruce :-) :-)
|
29.315 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Wed Apr 24 1991 11:50 | 14 |
| Just because some player is going to be a HOFer doesn't mean one has to
like that player, or fall down over them, or j**k off to posters of
them.
Geez. Roger is a great pitcher. I don't think he's the greatest ever.
I sure hope Morgan doesn't burn him out, or Roger doesn't burn out and
slide down the stretch. With Darwin out, the Sox really need him to
*never* lose.
re: Chris - how the hell does Dean Smif get into the Red Sox note?
The only connection I can see is that the Sox haven't won since 1918,
and Dean's only one once in 31 years.... ;-)
JD
|
29.316 | | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Apr 24 1991 12:01 | 6 |
| JD,
Never said you had to like, fall down, or lacquer up over posters to
APPRECIATE a great ball player.
Steve
|
29.317 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Wed Apr 24 1991 12:17 | 14 |
| Steve,
I know. Some folks seem to think that you have to love a guy cuz he's
a HOFer. That's what always got me into trouble with Bird.
Appreciate he's playing, just never felt he was the greatest thing
since sliced bread. And for that I'd get nailed.
Anyway, its too early in the season for me to start proclaiming anyone
as super. It's a great start, but one sore shoulder or other ailment
wipes it all out.
Hey, Roger is on my DECfantasy team, so I'm happy!
JD
|
29.318 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:04 | 4 |
| Roger was born in 1962, if memory serves me correctly, and his name is
William Roger Clemens.
John
|
29.319 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:05 | 5 |
| So, he shouldn't really be ROcket Roger, but something like Ballistic
Bill, or Whiffling William...
DJ
|
29.320 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Apr 25 1991 13:14 | 5 |
| � How long do you bat a .250 hitter lead-off and a .100 hitter
� second?
Well, Wade's almost up to .300 now and has 3 HRs. Jody Reed was
benched in favor of Steve Lyons last night.
|
29.321 | Multiple smileys intended | WFOV12::MORRISON | That was just a dream. | Thu Apr 25 1991 14:19 | 8 |
|
I must have contracted something along the lines of the
Dinsmore Kiss of Death. The minute I start pluckin' on the Holy
Chicken Man, he wakes up.
He's still a bum!
Bull~
|
29.322 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Apr 25 1991 16:21 | 6 |
| I was listening to Eddie Anvilhaid on the way home last night and
he decides to call up Western Union and send a telegram to Wade Boggs
urging him to continue swinging for the fences and wanting to win, instead
of caring about personal goals. It was pretty funny.
/Don
|
29.323 | | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | Built for comfort | Thu Apr 25 1991 16:35 | 16 |
| RE: Boggs and personal goals
Intersting note related....last night Boggs got his 1,800th career hit,
it was a double to left. When they flashed this on the diamond vision, the
crowd gave Boggs a standing O. The camera zoomed right in on Boggs and for
about 15-20 seconds it seemd like he had no idea why everyone was cheering (he
was standing on 2nd with his back to the diamond vision). When he started
looking around to figure out what was going on, he looked behind and you could
see that he realized what all the noise was for. He then gave a nice
tip-o-the-cap to the crowd.
Didn't seem to concerned with his own hit count last night.
FWIW,
Scott
|
29.324 | | FDCV07::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Thu Apr 25 1991 17:03 | 6 |
| How come we have never seen the SLasher and eddie at te same
dinner table... Hmmmmmmm.....
REK
many :-}
|
29.325 | It has to be said ... | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Fri Apr 26 1991 11:21 | 3 |
| re .323
Boggs is a good actor that's all ...
|
29.326 | Knew it was coming | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | Built for comfort | Fri Apr 26 1991 11:57 | 6 |
| RE: -< It has to be said ... >-
Yup, I would have been quite dissapointed if no one had said it.
8^)
|
29.327 | | CAM::WAY | I believe I'll dust my broom... | Fri Apr 26 1991 12:13 | 10 |
| Kind of gives you that familiar "homey" feeling, ya know.
Like coming home on a Friday night, knowing how comfortable your furniture
is, sitting down, putting your feet up on the coffee table, knowing that
first beer is going to go down so well.
If it hadn't been said, it would feel so uncomfortable in here.....
'Saw
|
29.328 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Fri Apr 26 1991 12:14 | 6 |
|
I wish Boggs would bunt more, cuz he can lay one down with the best of
'em.
Dickstah
|
29.329 | the widest strikezone in the game... | CHIEFF::CHILDS | When it matters, Dean never wins | Fri Apr 26 1991 13:28 | 7 |
|
Tough to get excited about 1800 hits when 1300 of them are girly mon little
dribblers just out of the shortstop's reach....
Steve, it's hard to appreciate a guy who has an unfair advantage....
mike
|
29.330 | That amazing expanding, contracting Fenway strike zone... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Apr 26 1991 16:56 | 8 |
|
> -< the widest strikezone in the game... >-
Who, Boggs or Clemens? You're coming so fast with these conspiracy
theories, mike, I can't keep up with ya...
glenn
|
29.331 | Clemens suspension upheld | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 26 1991 18:14 | 3 |
| Before the Red Sox conference became unreachable, I saw a note that
reported that Vincent has upheld Clemen's suspension. He will get a 5
game suspension and will miss his next start.
|
29.332 | easy to figure out.. | AGNT99::CHILDS | Almost as misunderstood as Clemens | Sat Apr 27 1991 00:52 | 6 |
|
Cmon Glem widest strikezone is Clemens, smallest strikezone is Boggs...
;^)
mike
|
29.333 | | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon Apr 29 1991 10:05 | 9 |
|
How come we never see /Don and Eddie at the same table?
Because there both in the kitchen licking the pot!
Sorry /'er it had to be said. 8^)
Steve
|
29.334 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Apr 29 1991 17:01 | 3 |
| >> Before the Red Sox conference became unreachable
Yeah, sorry. Someone pulled a cable, leaving us in a network by ourselves.
|
29.335 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu May 09 1991 08:58 | 4 |
| You mean to tell me that Roger didn't pitch a shutout again
last night? What a bum!
/Don
|
29.336 | Nice slide, Wade. | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Gun Control:== Steady Aim | Thu May 09 1991 09:14 | 4 |
| Yeah Slasher, the bum's ERA soared to 0.73. And he's on the cover of
SI to boot.
Mark.
|
29.337 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu May 09 1991 09:56 | 5 |
| Agreed Mark. The guy's ERA has more than doubled in his last
two starts. I think the Red Sox should trade him now while they
still can get something for him.
/Don
|
29.338 | Whaddayagonnado | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | NotbadNotemptyNotalive | Thu May 09 1991 10:08 | 9 |
|
Run should never have scored, but Rivera could not handle Pe�a's throw to nab
Puckett stealing second to complete the double play (the batter K'd) and end
the innning. If Rivera holds on, Puckett was nailed and the innning is over.
Puckett was singled home by the next batter. oh well...
Six and oh and still rolling!
Scott
|
29.339 | | REFINE::ASHE | Whatever happened to the Joboxers | Thu May 09 1991 12:19 | 9 |
| I hope Mr. Clemens realizes he's keeping the juggernaut of the Detriot
(tm?) Tigers from first place. Sure, if Gullickson was 6-0 instead
of 4-0, who would be winning the AL East?
I think they should ban that 'do he's got. He's probably got some
styling mousse in it that he's using like Gaylord Perry. Does he
put it on before or after his Dockers? Slasher, whaddya think?
-Walt
|
29.340 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu May 09 1991 12:27 | 6 |
| Don't think Roger wears Dockers� Walt, he prefers Lee Jeans.
Those are the jeans you wear when you're going to play a hellacious
game of volleyball, or cut down a tree, or save the town from the
river overflowing. Mainly stuff like that...
/Don
|
29.343 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Fri May 10 1991 09:10 | 9 |
| I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but the jeans advertised in those
commercials where the guys are removing the stump and playing that
manly game of full contact volleyball are Levi's jeans.
In fact, one of them is for Levi's 540s, the jeans designed for props. ;^)
Great photo of Roger on this week's SI cover!!!
'Saw
|
29.344 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Take your instincts by the reins | Fri May 10 1991 10:04 | 6 |
| Boston scored 5 in the 7th for a come-from-behind 8-4 victory. Bolton
finally got hit hard. Franco's tater into the CF bleachers was a shot.
Detroit and Toronto win to keep pace.
Mark.
|
29.345 | | LEAF::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Fri May 10 1991 10:05 | 4 |
| Hate those jeans with the button fly! It's brutal when you have to go
REALLY bad.
=Bob=
|
29.346 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Fri May 10 1991 11:37 | 17 |
| Those are the 501 button fly. Levi's also make a 505 regular fly,
a 519 I think, and the 540s. If you're built like a prop, the 540s
feel REALLY comfortable.....
When I was in the FD, we used to have parade uniforms with wool pants,
button fly. I used to carry the American flag a lot, so it was really
a bitch when you had your little parchesi cup on, and then had to
dump the beers you drank on the way to the parade, just before marching.
Undo seven buttons, move that parchesi cup, take care of business,
do up seven buttson, rearrange that parchesi cup, and then run back
to the head of the unit because the Chief was having a coronary about
"where's the American flag, where's the American flag????"
After two years, we finallyg got some new pants!
'Saw
|
29.347 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Take your instincts by the reins | Fri May 10 1991 12:53 | 3 |
| What's this have to do with the Red Sox?
Mark.
|
29.348 | Maybe sometin 2 do wif fly poppin'? | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Fri May 10 1991 13:25 | 1 |
|
|
29.349 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Fri May 10 1991 14:53 | 10 |
| DUH!, are you guys stupid.
The point was that our pants were SO old they were new the last
time the Sox won the series.
I mean, REALLY, you guys are slipping!
8^)
'Saw
|
29.350 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Lazarus,ThePhoenix,Broons | Fri May 10 1991 15:02 | 4 |
| Hey to me all these yuppified jeans are all the same anyhow.
I look for the cheapest...
/Don
|
29.351 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Fri May 10 1991 18:11 | 9 |
| Shame on you Slasher!
Levi's jeans yuppiefied? Bull hooey...
For a long time Levi's were all there were. It's still pretty much all
I wear in jeans. It's nice that they've come out with different styles
however, for those of us with ample gluteus maximus areas....8^)
'Saw
|
29.352 | FrankWa, U sayin you got a plate stacker???? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Sun May 12 1991 22:40 | 1 |
|
|
29.353 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Mon May 13 1991 09:02 | 18 |
| Kev --
I wouldn't call it a plate stacker, more like a prop butt. 8^)
It's bigger now than I'd like, but by the end of the summer it should
be better.
Alas, I'll never have the uplifted, cut up buttocks that Franz was drooling
over in SNL this season 8^)
And if I could wish for ONE thing, for ONE day before I die, I'd like
to have, just for ONE day, **BLAZING** speed. I'd love to know what it's
like to go one-on-one with some guy down the sideline, turn on the jets,
and watch him eat my dust. THAT'S what I'd like 8^)
'Saw
|
29.354 | He blacks out the Yank part tho' 8^) | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon May 13 1991 09:16 | 6 |
| /Don wears "Big Yank" jeans. 2 for 9.99 at Woolworths.
Steve
|
29.355 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | Wilt's heart was 2 sizes 2 small | Mon May 13 1991 09:21 | 7 |
|
Saw, at one time maybe not but now with the 5 or 6 different styles and the
extra 10 bucks for the name Levi's classify as yuppiester leg warmers...
and long before there was Levi's there were Wranglers....Lee's rule!!!
mike
|
29.356 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Mon May 13 1991 09:37 | 5 |
| Oh, see I never pay extra money for my Levis. I get them a Bob's stores,
and they're usually pretty cheap. I mean, I could pick them up at a place
like The Gap, but there I'd pay the yuppie price... 8^)
'Saw
|
29.357 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon May 13 1991 10:43 | 17 |
| Down on the farm, the PawSox swept a 3 game series with Richmond over
the weekend. Pawtucket's pitching gave up 3 runs in 3 games. Quintall,
just up from New Britain, pitched a no hitter Saturday. Morton looked
good yesterday.
Only homer was by Jeff Stone, the Sox' latest Chico Walker
impersonator. Lancelotti continues to get a hit a game. Good looking
shortstop named Valentin. Scott Cooper continues to UNIMPRESS. Marty
Barret's younger brother, Tom, plays second for Pawtucket. Plantier
looking polished and Vaughan looking more and more deadly. Eric Wedge,
the catcher out of Wichita St very good defensively. Has yet to impress
at the plate.
PawSox in first place now in IL.
Rich
|
29.358 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon May 13 1991 10:44 | 7 |
| re - last
My mistake....Qunitall did not pitch a no-hitter. He gave up no runs
and 5 hits.
Rich
|
29.359 | Inventor of the Jean machine | JURAN::MCKAY | | Mon May 13 1991 18:44 | 7 |
| Frank,
Who are you kidding Bob's Stores is the yuppied Bob's Surplus
and you know it 8*) About the only difference in the gap and bob's
stores is one's generally in a mall.........
Jimbo
|
29.360 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to the Sugarhill Gang? | Tue May 14 1991 01:50 | 2 |
| Do they sell power generators?
|
29.361 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | DannyAterio,SDavisJR,GregHines,JD | Tue May 14 1991 09:43 | 3 |
| Well, Reardon was due.
Mark.
|
29.362 | | CAM::WAY | The National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW! | Tue May 14 1991 09:46 | 15 |
| No way, Jimbo.
At least not the one in Manchester. The prices are GREAT. (And that
my friend, helps me decide where to shop).
Jeans, as I said, are cheaper, but not only that, I can usually save
about 25% on running shoes, which really helps out.
Besides, I didn't see any rollerblades sold in the store, so it can't
be YUPPIE.....
Re the Sox:
So it was reardon catering lasted night???
|
29.363 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | DannyAterio,SDavisJR,GregHines,JD | Tue May 14 1991 09:49 | 4 |
| Not exactly catering, Saw. Sox lead 3-2 with two outs and two strikes.
The rest is history.
Mark.
|
29.364 | | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Tue May 14 1991 10:25 | 9 |
| Sox? Which ones. I didn't see the game -- although during the power outage
they did show some of the Canada-Japan rugby international.
So, lemme get this straight. The Sox were ahead 3-2 and Reardon served up
a homer meatball to tie the game?
Reardon doesn't usually cater, that's usually Jeff Gray's responsibility...
'Saw
|
29.365 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue May 14 1991 11:03 | 8 |
|
> Reardon doesn't usually cater, that's usually Jeff Gray's responsibility...
Gray catered in the tenth. Not with the one big entree like Reardon,
but with a nice a little buffet spread nonetheless...
glenn
|
29.366 | YAWN | LEAF::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Tue May 14 1991 11:16 | 16 |
| I was at the game.
Wicked bizzare when the lights went out. The guy I went to the game with told
me he was in the middle of checking out a young lady, when ZAP! He thought he
was being taught a lesson.
Sherm Feller, who has been the PA announcer for as long as I can remember, led
the crowd in singing "Take Me Out to the Ball Game", and Ninj would have totally
lost it over all the beach balls that were bouncing around once the emergency
lights came on.
Between the blackout and extra innings, it made for quite a late night. Lindsey
doesn't seem to understand this, and was still up at 5:30. Glad I
could come in to work to get some rest. ;*)
=Bob=
|
29.367 | | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Tue May 14 1991 11:18 | 5 |
| Hell, I could pitch better than Gray, and on a good day, I'm lucky
if I have enough control to hit the Mike Childs Definition of the
ClemensZone(tm)....
'Saw
|
29.368 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue May 14 1991 11:18 | 3 |
| If I'd been there last night I could have been the "Stealth Ninja"
John
|
29.369 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 14 1991 11:45 | 11 |
| Actually, Gray has been pitching very effectively. He had a bad
opening series in Toronto, but has pretty much done the job as
Reardon's set up man.
I didn't see Gray's performance last night, I just listened on the
radio. If Pe�a's throw had been on the money on the stolen base
attempt, Gray would have been out of the inning with no damage done.
As it was, he issued an intentional walk to the DH (Thomas?) to get to
the backup catcher Korvice. With 2 out and runners on 1st and 2nd,
Korvice hit a shot just out of the reach of a diving Rivera to score
the runner from second for the game winner.
|
29.370 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Welcome to the occupation | Tue May 14 1991 11:56 | 9 |
| What Mac said.
Gray has been *very* effective this year and if you asked Reardon, he'd
tell you that Gray effective setup role has been the primary reason
Reardon's been so effective.
Saw, do you guys get newpapers or TV in Hebron?
Mark.
|
29.371 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue May 14 1991 12:01 | 6 |
| Agree that Gray has been effective, but the Sox need to take care not
to overuse him (he had 17 appearances already going into this weekend's
action).
py
|
29.372 | | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Tue May 14 1991 12:38 | 24 |
| Mark --
Yeah, we get all kinds of TV...lots of Meningitis and Pneumonia too...
Seriously, yes, I do get TV. I don't watch all that much TV, and I
skim the papers. I don't read the box scores, but check the standings
most of the time.
The Red Sox games I have seen, Gray has screwed the pooch and stepped out
the door. Admittedly, I don't watch many games -- I have to be in the
mood. Plus, with rugby season in full swing, and things to do out and
around, I'm not home all much.
So, I haven't seen every opportunity that Gray has had. The ones I have
seen....gee, maybe I'M the jinx....
On a related note, I did watch Sunday's game. I thought the pitcher
that they brought in after Lamp (#50-something) pitched pretty well.
That game was funny for the comedy of errors in right field....
'Saw
|
29.373 | Remembering the childhood years 8*) | JURAN::MCKAY | | Tue May 14 1991 12:56 | 9 |
| C'mon now Frank Bob's surplus was a great store when it had one
store in Middletown now it has three and they are all certainly
a bunch more upscale than the original. Bob's Surplus was the
spags of jeans at one time and it certainly isn't that now....
I can also vouch for tv in Hebron and just about everything Frank
says about the area 8*)
Jimbo
|
29.374 | | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Tue May 14 1991 14:39 | 18 |
| You might be right Jimbo.
But see, I've been trained not to see yuppie stuff. When I go to Bobs
I go to one of three sections: Running Shoes, Work Boots, or Levis Unwashed
(virgin - no acid shit or stone stuff) 540 Jeans. Occasionally, if
heavy sweats (like Russell or Champions) are on sale I'll stop there.
And in the winter I pick up a couple of Five Brother chamois shirt or
flannels on sale.
Then I go drool over the cashiers (attractive HS girls ) while I pay
for my purchases...
After that I'm outta there.
'Saw
PS On the rare occasion I've seen a quiche eater in there, I snarl and
bump into their skrawny little rollerblading bodies 8^)
|
29.375 | yeah I know we should get back to baseball, but... | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Jose fiddles and diddles | Tue May 14 1991 14:53 | 6 |
| re 'Saw, best place for low-price jeans is the Vanity Fair Outlet
Complex (there's one in North Dartmouth, MA and one in Reading, PA).
Lee jeans 1/2 off *everyday*...
py
|
29.376 | | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Tue May 14 1991 16:34 | 8 |
| PY --
GREAT, GREAT p-name, there dude....
And if I'm up in that neck of the woods, I'll have to try to find those
places....
'Saw
|
29.377 | CHAINSAW DOES IT DOGGIE STYLE - FILM @11:00 | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Wed May 15 1991 13:08 | 4 |
| >> I snarl and.....
;^)
|
29.378 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed May 15 1991 13:56 | 4 |
| Did Gorman really want Tom Gordon for Mike Marshall? It's no
wonder he can't trade the guy.
/Don
|
29.379 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri May 17 1991 01:23 | 5 |
| Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
looks like crap on the TV.
Rich
|
29.380 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri May 17 1991 08:03 | 3 |
| Rich, try washing your TV. :*)
lEe
|
29.381 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Sun May 19 1991 11:05 | 6 |
| Yeah, I know, LeE. Now that I'm down south, lordy knows what kind of
critters get on the cable wires or what varmints make nests on my screen.
Seriously, looked like lots of the Fenway OF was spray painted.
|
29.382 | Much more of this and it may be time to fire the groundkeeper... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Sun May 19 1991 22:23 | 11 |
|
> Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
> looks like crap on the TV.
New sod in some spots where the grass was supposedly killed by some
fungus. I agree, it looks like sh!&. Worsted I've ever seen it. But
it still probably plays better than last year when there was no grass
in those same spots...
glenn
|
29.383 | Happy Mondays: Pills, Thrills and Bellyaches... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Shot NG! He forgot to call the bank | Mon May 20 1991 10:42 | 10 |
|
> Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
> looks like crap on the TV.
That's the Clemens' spot. Roger's doctor told him that a black spot
in that particlar area of the field would effect the home plate ump's
vision thus increasing Roger's strikezone....
;^)
|
29.384 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 20 1991 17:12 | 6 |
| I must say I am impressed with the self-restraint of Mike C. I figured
he'd be in here today going on and on about Clemens' first loss of the
season. At the very least, I expected a mail message or two.
Then again, Mike may still be recovering from the elimination of the
Celtics...
|
29.385 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and her head has no room | Tue May 21 1991 09:06 | 4 |
|
1 loss not enough ammo, just wait....
;^)
|
29.386 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:13 | 6 |
| Last week when Eddie Anvilhead had abandoned the Red Sox cause he
said that the money spent of the free agents over the winter was the worst
waste of money since the french built the Maginot Line. I thought it was
funny.
/Don
|
29.387 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Aspiring Fender Bender | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:15 | 4 |
| This, the same Addie Anvilhead, who proclaimed that this was the year
of the Red Sox based upon these very same signings?
Mark.
|
29.388 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | It just takes a smidgeon... | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:36 | 10 |
| Andleman isn't happy unless he has something to bitch about. In the
weeks that followed Mike Boddicker's defection to KC, he groused
endlessly that the Red Sox were "futzing around", and kept saying
"Sign Jackie Clahk no matter what the cost." The Sox did just that
(along with signing Egg Foo Young and Darwin), so then he changes his
tune and says "the Sox were bidding against themselves, bla bla bla."
Yawn...
py
|
29.389 | Straight sports shows are just as boring... they all are... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 20 1991 17:50 | 6 |
|
Sheesh guys, it's talk radio. Like pro wrestling, you know what's
going on, and you get what you pay for...
glenn
|
29.390 | Hey, any of us in Sports qualifies! 8^) | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:08 | 7 |
|
I can't believe the money anvilhead makes for being a total stiff!!
America! What a concept!
Steve
|
29.391 | "Mike appreciate the support your Hero"-Roger Clemens ;^) | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:11 | 3 |
|
Hey Don how'd my good buddy Clemens do the other night when he pitched I didn't
catch the results????
|
29.392 | Next question? | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Aspiring Fender Bender | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:16 | 13 |
| <<< Note 29.391 by AGNT99::CHILDS "I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid" >>>
-< "Mike appreciate the support your Hero"-Roger Clemens ;^) >-
> Hey Don how'd my good buddy Clemens do the other night when he pitched I didn't
> catch the results????
He gave up 0 earned runs and lost because his team couldn't make 2
routine plays.
Thanks for asking.
Mark.
|
29.393 | but Markie 6 walks???? | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:21 | 0 |
29.394 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Aspiring Fender Bender | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:27 | 5 |
| The 6 walks mean nothing if he had a defense. Not a vintage Clemens
performance, but he did pitch out a couple of jams. He definitely
pitched well enough to win.
Mark.
|
29.395 | | CAM::WAY | Ruck till you puke... | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:30 | 16 |
| Mike, Mike, Mike --
Everybody has a slightly off day from time to time...
I mean, you do, I do, Dr Midnight does, Lufay does, Schneider does, MrT does,
Bob Hunt does, Dickstah does, JD does, ACC Chris does, Dean Smith does
a lot in the NCAA Tourney, Dinz does, Slasher does.....
So, Roger had an off day...
I mean, when you come right down to it, we're all a little off.....
(Except for Hawk -- he's just a plain freakin' lunatic!)
'Saw
|
29.396 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:58 | 6 |
| �Slasher does.....
Do not. Canseco hit a "vogue" homerun last night but the Athletics
and the best pitcher in the game (according to some) still lost.
/Don
|
29.397 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:40 | 11 |
|
but Markie if he doesn't put those guys on base they don't score right?
Saw I realize this, also realize this is friday chopsbusting day supreme
and when he was godly like at the beginging of the year how many barbs got
hurled at moi? I took them in stride bid my time now it's my turn aren't
you boys man enough to take it?
;^)
|
29.398 | He puts 'em on, they stays there! | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Careful Don't Step in DECrap | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:45 | 11 |
| >> if he doesn't put those guys on base they don't score right?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I recall the inning they scored all the
runs, the runners got on on errors, then got driven home by Griffette (tm)
{I'm sick of this "Griffey-Junior" cr*p} with his GR double...
Don't recall that Rocket walks occurred in that inning; he managed to
keep those runners from scoring...
_ SteveT
|
29.399 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:46 | 3 |
| Actually, Mike, I don't think the walks hurt him. He pitched himself
out of a couple of bases loaded jams. The damage came in the 5th when
the Sox committed 2 errors which accounted for 3 unearned runs.
|
29.400 | hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 11:10 | 3 |
| whatever......
here you go grease your woodies ROGER IS GAWD!!!!!
|
29.401 | Talk about greasing it up... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 21 1991 11:50 | 7 |
|
Hey, Mike, if the best you can do is sling barbs at a guy who is
obviously in a slump but whose ERA still hovers around 2.00 for all his
bad work, then bring it on!
glenn
|
29.402 | August swoon??? | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 12:25 | 6 |
|
yeah Glenn it has been a tough hoe this year. He's been good to kids, the press
and murder on the opposition. Not much ammo for me to use. Hopefully in time
that will change.
mike
|
29.403 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Aspiring Fender Bender | Fri Jun 21 1991 12:42 | 5 |
| Actually, Mike, I was expecting to hear from you after Roger was forced
to turn in his gun permit. After all, what the Hell does anyone need
to own a gun for?
Mark.
|
29.404 | Superman, he ain't | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Careful Don't Step in DECrap | Fri Jun 21 1991 12:45 | 8 |
| >> He's been good to kids, the press and murder on the opposition.
>> Not much ammo for me to use.
Not much for Roger, either, now the Framingham cops took his
gun-permit. (Still got his guns, though -- under his wife's name.)
- SteveT, glad_to_see_Rocket_succeeding_as_a_member_of_the_human_race
|
29.405 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Fri Jun 21 1991 14:14 | 7 |
|
For some silly reason that's beyond me Mark some people actually find enjoyment
from them Mark. I don't begrudge them that as long as they do it safely and
store them properly. I went shooting a couple of times when I was younger
never really enjoyed.
Also I never heard the story until now....
|
29.406 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 21 1991 15:02 | 1 |
| No self respectin' Texan would be caught dead without a coupla guns.
|
29.407 | Soxs up 4-1, Mike doesn't worry remembers 9 run lead blown before | CHIEFF::CHILDS | we're chained... | Wed Jun 26 1991 11:25 | 10 |
|
"My worst asset may be being around the plate too much...The harder I throw
the harder it comes back at me"...
my idol his highness the grand poopaa's comments after last night's loss...
maybe he isn't even going to wait till august to swoon...
mike
|
29.408 | SI is to blam! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Inside is out, Outside is in... | Wed Jun 26 1991 12:33 | 2 |
| Yo, Mike. Hope you don't end up with Shaun Cassidy and/or Saturday
Night Fever, on that tape...
|
29.409 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Aspiring Fender Bender | Thu Jun 27 1991 08:55 | 3 |
| "Yanks Spank, Sox Stank", film @ 11.
Mark.
|
29.410 | Inquiring O's fans gotta know | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | It just takes a smidgeon... | Fri Jun 28 1991 14:02 | 5 |
| What's the story with Clemens? I heard on NESN this morning that he
may not make his scheduled start on Sunday because of a stomach ailment?
py
|
29.411 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Starland Vocal Band? | Fri Jun 28 1991 14:26 | 2 |
| He's got the flu. He's scheduled to pitch Sunday, but they don't know
if he'll go... nice thing to have in 95�+ heat...
|
29.412 | 'Tis true! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Rick Fox: 1991's Michael Smith??? | Fri Jun 28 1991 15:01 | 7 |
| Actually, Clemens ate a triple helping of refried beans on "A Taste
of Mexico" day i n the clubhouse Wednesday, and the beans have yet
to leave his system.
HTH,
NAZZ
|
29.413 | GONGGONGGONGGONGGO - fallin' fast for 3rd... | CRBOSS::DERRY | Inside is out, Outside is in... | Mon Jul 01 1991 10:19 | 1 |
|
|
29.414 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Tue Jul 02 1991 13:54 | 14 |
| The Hit Dog was barking last night, and the rest of the Red Sox
regulars are grumbling about playing time. While Brunansky and Clark
struggle to stay above the Mendoza line, it seems like Bonehaid will make
the .305 hitting Quintana ride the pine. The two best candidates for the
odd man out in the rotating lineup are Bruno and the Whiffer, at least
until one of them can prove he can hit consistently. The Globe reported
that Bonehaid wanted to make sure everyone knew that Carlos was responsible
for losing the game Sunday in Baltimore despite never telling Carlos of his
intentions of playing him in right field until game time (Quintana didn't
even have his outfield glove with him). The sad truth is that the only
change that Bonehaid is capable of handling is that of the quarter, nickle
and dime variety. 8^(
/Don
|
29.415 | Lots o runs | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | SET HELP/EARTHDAY=EVERYDAY | Wed Jul 03 1991 09:57 | 2 |
| Well, /Don, ya got yer wish. Vaughn Dh'd while The Whiffer (better � that one
quick!) sat. Final score was something like 12-4 Sox.
|
29.416 | Gossage,Fingers,Lyons :-) | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Party on Garth! Party on Wayne! | Mon Jul 22 1991 08:55 | 1 |
|
|
29.417 | Hey, when's the B's season start. (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | Jumpin' ship... | Mon Jul 22 1991 09:07 | 1 |
| GONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONG... You gotta laugh.
|
29.418 | Time to jump on the Twinkies B-wagon? | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Mon Jul 22 1991 09:37 | 6 |
| yer right.
For whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee, Lou and Joe.
Boggs thinks that this is just another way the Lord is testing them.
Don't ya luv them reborn sexahexaholics.
|
29.419 | A mighty stench eminating from the Fenz. | 30301::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon Jul 22 1991 09:39 | 13 |
|
Do we start building the coffin yet?
Is this the end of Tollway Joe?
While thier at it why don't they can Gorman too.
Wait...if they did can Gorman, they'd lose alot of hotdog & pizza
revenue. He probably doesn't pay for it anyway.
Steve
|
29.420 | Which is worse? | HPSRAD::RIEU | I want my CIPBM! | Mon Jul 22 1991 09:47 | 2 |
| If they can Lou, does that put a Sully back in charge?
Denny
|
29.421 | I know it's bad... | WV3::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon Jul 22 1991 11:17 | 7 |
|
Maybe we hope that Mrs. Yawkey finally croaks??
Steve
|
29.422 | | MAXWEL::CHILDS | sign said, Stay Away Fool.. | Wed Jul 24 1991 17:22 | 2 |
|
Is Clemens injuried?
|
29.423 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 24 1991 17:50 | 4 |
| � Is Clemens injuried?
Not that I know of, Mike. He pitched a beauty against Texas the other
night but lost 2-1.
|
29.424 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Badda-bing, badda-boom | Wed Jul 24 1991 17:53 | 6 |
|
Oil Can Boyd goes for Texas tonight as the Sox seek to extend their
losing streak. This could be humiliating.
Dickstah
|
29.425 | Hesketh, the best they got?????? | WV3::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Thu Jul 25 1991 09:02 | 8 |
|
Oh boy. Sox win 2-1 over Trash Can and the Rangers. I think the
Rangers must have felt bad for Boston and let em have the last
game.
Steve
|
29.426 | Sox wuz lucky | EARRTH::BROOKS | Increase The Peace ! | Thu Jul 25 1991 12:45 | 1 |
|
|
29.427 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Badda-bing, badda-boom | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:35 | 49 |
|
Are you a Red Sox fan who feels "There's nothing good on TV" (all 80
channels) when there is no game?
Are you tired of watching them lose day in and day out?
Well, being a supporter of the arts, I want to pass along some
alternative viewing that can be had FREE on one of many of your local
public-supported stations. PBS is good and good for you.
[from the monthly PBS broadcast magazine]
"The Civil War: Part XII, The Humour"
-This documentary chronicles the jokes made about Abe Lincoln from both
sides of the Mason-Dixon line. Highlights include Ulysses S. Grant's
collection of whoopie cushions, hand buzzers, and fake horse doo; the
diary of Fred Putznoop, who delivered the stand-up monologue at Ford's
Theater the night Lincoln was shot; short-sheeting while tenting on the
old camp ground.
"Cooking with George Washington Carver"
-This month covers such items as peanut pancake surprise, peanut
5-alarm chile, peanut napoleons, and peanut sausage. Sponsored by
Planters(tm).
"Sickening Kingdom"
-This charming nature show features the eating habits of the vulture as
we see these beautiful creatures dining on an armalillo road kill.
Next is a lion family as they stalk the fleet gazelle, rip it to
shreds, and drag the flyblown remains back to the rest of the nuclear
family. Finally, see how mother yellow-bellied crawbills lovingly
regurgitate half-digested insects into the mouths of their young
waiting hungrily in their nest. This show is made possible through a
grant from Little Debbie Snack Cakes.
"I, Pee Wee"
This is a fictional account of a former shortstop turned children's
television show host, who manages to tumble from heroism to ignominy,
in the classic tradition of the great Greek tragedies. Includes
interviews with Dr. Ruth Westheimer. Narrated by Fred Rogers.
Check your local listing for times/dates.
Dickstah
|
29.428 | | CAM::WAY | Pee Wee = Manson minus swastika | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:44 | 20 |
| Actually, I have a woodie over the way the Red Sox are playing.
I mean, if you wanna stink up the joint, why not cheese off a really good
sulfur one. That's what the Sux are doing.
They bought all that talent, and they put all their eggs in the basket
marked Roger Clemens. Clark is a stiff, Morgan, well, I still haven't
figured out if this guy has a brain or where he hides it if he does...
Gorman? Should be running a used car lot for all his savvy.
The owners? Hope they die, because that's what it will take to put
a winner in Fenway Park....
Like Pee Wee, who as *almost* there, the Red Sox never quite climax....
'Saw
|
29.429 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:46 | 6 |
| > Are you a Red Sox fan who feels "There's nothing good on TV" (all 80
> channels) when there is no game?
I think you meant to say: "there's nothing good on TV even when
there IS a game on." Right?
Denny
|
29.430 | | CAM::WAY | Pee Wee = Manson minus swastika | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:55 | 4 |
| Any time the Sux play lately it's NO GAME.....
8^)
|
29.431 | suprised Karen hasn't gonged lately | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Jul 30 1991 15:04 | 14 |
| Hey there - Lighten up willya???
The Sox are playing the way they are
To prepare us for the Patriots!!!!!!!
ta boom!!!!
Kev
|
29.432 | Funniest note of the year | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Some folks trust in reason | Tue Jul 30 1991 15:25 | 3 |
| I PeeWee?!? Dickstah, you're a nut!
Dan
|
29.433 | sulfur indeed | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | You watch too much TV kid | Tue Jul 30 1991 15:25 | 10 |
| Just when you thought this team had made every bonehead play in the
book, they come up with another one -- Kevin Morton The Phenom has
*balked* in a run in this afternoon's game!
2-1 Texas in the third inning. For anyone who gives a rat's butt,
they're giving updates in VAXWRK::RED_SOX (check the last few replies
to topic 76).
py
|
29.434 | enjoying every minute of it... | MAXWEL::CHILDS | He even danced with Maryln-NO WAY! | Wed Jul 31 1991 01:28 | 9 |
|
is Roger's era over 5 yet?
hahahahaaa 6-0 and he won't even win 20.....he who laughs last laughs
best...
jack clark on a 684 rbi pace hahahahahhaaa
mike
|
29.435 | STILL THE BEST | LUDWIG::GARRY | Go Irish | Wed Jul 31 1991 07:53 | 7 |
|
Mike,
Its not even half of 5 and won't be all year.
Tom
|
29.436 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Jul 31 1991 08:03 | 6 |
| Is it true that, every time the "Q" comes to the plate two times in the
same inning against the Can in Fenway, he gets 6 RBI's?
Amazing how he "always" does this. Never failed.
lEe :*)
|
29.437 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dude without a 'tude | Wed Jul 31 1991 10:06 | 15 |
|
And The Can urinating and lamenting after the game was, well, classic
Oil Can.
"I din Wan pitch here, Ah tol' 'em I din wan pitch here, Ah don' wan
pitch here ev'agin. They's too many bad thins here and too much for me
to think 'bout and not cons'trate on mah pitchin."
HAHAHAH. Yeah right, Can. Get paid a million bucks a year, then tell
your owner/manager you don't like to pitch in certain places and may
you please be excused from your turn in the rotation. Get a job, fer
cripes sake.
Dickstah
|
29.438 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | You watch too much TV kid | Wed Jul 31 1991 10:24 | 18 |
| re a couple back, Quintana's second hit in the 3rd inning (the 2-run
double) was off Wayne Rosenthal, who came in to relieve Boyd halfway
through the onslaught.
As for the Can, since the trade to the Rangers just last week he has:
Publicly said he'd rather be back in the National League
Demanded that the Rangers sign him for $2 million next year
Bitched about having to start in Fenway against his former team
Gotta wonder how much longer it'll be before he wears out his welcome
in Texas...
py
|
29.439 | | WMOIS::COOK_T | Smithwick's @ McSwiggins=Heaven | Wed Jul 31 1991 10:44 | 4 |
| The Red Sox are to Baseball, what the Whalers are to Hockey!
Conan
|
29.440 | HAH! | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Wed Jul 31 1991 10:58 | 24 |
| No, they're not.
The Red Sox, since 1918, have come close a lot. They were in four World
World Series, the last three out of five years(?) they played in the
ACLS. Of course, every remembers 1978 8^)
In the late 40's they were consistently in the hunt, often losing the
pennant in the late days of the race.
The Whalers on the other hand, have never, ever, even come anywhere near
close by the time the fat lady sings. They've never moved out of their
division, even.
The Whalers are the ULTIMATE in mediocrity. They have never had a superstar,
whereas cases can be made for many players who've worn the Red Sox uniform.
Nope, yer comparision falls down miserably when the light of cold
hard facks(tm) is shone upon it. Like PeeWee when the lights came up
and the cops came by, your analogy was just a tired, spent, little deviant 8^)
'Saw
|
29.441 | Gordie Howe was a superstar(not for Whalers) | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Wed Jul 31 1991 12:39 | 10 |
| But 'Saw,
Methinks I recall you lusting for das MegaSuperstar RON FRANCIS!!
MikeL
PS. BTW, Have you read Koontz' new book "Cold Fire "? Wifey's reading
it now and says it's OK. Don't know the plot though.
|
29.442 | Double Hah! | WMOIS::COOK_T | Smithwick's @ McSwiggins=Heaven | Wed Jul 31 1991 12:42 | 6 |
| Me_thinks you defend the Red Sox with the same voracity as ACCrisp does
UNC. Lets see; 1 in thirty 31 versus 1 in 73, I'd call that
mediocrity!
Conan
|
29.443 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TheFew,TheProud,TheBonehaids | Wed Jul 31 1991 13:19 | 4 |
| How many games do the Red Sox have to lose before Gorman gives
Bonehaid Morgan a job application for the Mass Turnpike Authority?
/Don
|
29.444 | Plow them roads boy! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Jul 31 1991 13:34 | 3 |
| I don't think he needs an application /Don. They're holding his old
job for him.
Denny
|
29.445 | | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Wed Jul 31 1991 13:51 | 24 |
| Nah, the Sox are different from UNC is one very special way.
YOu'll never hear a Baby Blue alum get on Dean-O. You'll never hear
them say He choked.
Red Sox fans (and believe me, I've been around a ton of them all my life)
feel the angst in every loss. Then we unmercifully get on the team,
the coach (has ANYONE forgiven Mac for leaving Billy Buck in there?)
and the GM and owners.
re Ron Francis:
Ronnie is a darn good hockey players, and a very classy act
off the ice. He was treated like SHIT by the Whalers.
He is not, however, a Gretzky or Lemieux.
Hence, the Whalers have never had a Superstar...
My logic still holds, impeccably.
'Saw
|
29.446 | This could be fun | WMOIS::COOK_T | Smithwick's @ McSwiggins=Heaven | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:31 | 8 |
| I'm mot talking about fan (or lemming) support just the record in the
big dance! 8^)
Logic is flawed in that regard
Conan
|
29.447 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:40 | 23 |
| What's up with Jeff Gray?
re Red Sox and Whalers
I think if one would look at won loss stats for the 80's, the Red Sox
would have one of the best in the American League - not THE best, but
one of the best.
'Saw is correct...the Sox have come a heck of alot closer more often
than the Whalers ever have - even in their short history.
The Red Sox won the first World Series ever played. Hall of Famers such
as Babe Ruth, Tris Speaker, Cy Young, Bobby Doerr, Jimmie Foxx
and Ted Williams played for the Sox. The Red Sox lost the AL pennant on
the last day of the season in 1948 and in 1949. Only the Athletics and
Yankees have appeared in more World Series, from the American League,
than the Red Sox.
Clearly, there is no logical comparison between the Whalers and Red
Sox.
Rich
|
29.448 | Got a quarter? No, Well F*ck you | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:46 | 26 |
| 'Saw,
I know all that stuff about Francis. Implied smileys, only busting
your cojones.
Speakin of the Sox n stuff, ain't them rascally Yankee nitwits in your
DMZ zone in Ct. actin' up a bit with the Sox being lobotomized for the
rest of the season!!
Speakin of DMZ zones. Can any of you Yank fans tell me the name of the
jail just south of Yankee Stadium ? I took the wife to a Sox-Yankee
game in the fall of '86 and parked near this hellhole of a prison
There were windows high up near the top of the jail, and the prisoners
were looking through the bars and screamin' bloody murder at the
people walkin' by going to the stadium. It was a riot! The fans (!??!)
going to the stadium were more abusive to the guys in jail than
vice/versa. The best part of that weekend was the next day when a
few of us ventured to Times Sq. area. On the way back to our hotel, we
went by Madison Sq and the infamous Hotel Penta. There we saw a sight
that only was possible in NYC. About 20' from the entrance of the
Penta (in broad daylight ) we passed a a buck naked filthy dude,
stretched out laying on the sidewalk, head crooked in palm ala Joe
Namath, wearing sunglasses, smokin' a cigar, drinkin' a Bud, with
a sign TAPED on his chest " HELP ME ". Priceless.
MikeL
|
29.449 | | WMOIS::COOK_T | Smithwick's @ McSwiggins=Heaven | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:47 | 4 |
| Since when has logic appied to ::Sports? 8^)
Conan
|
29.450 | Scooter = the Johnny Most of Baseball | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is a toddler now! | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:56 | 8 |
| Seen on the tube lasted night...
As the Yanks were losing to the Athletics, fans at Yankee Stadium lit a Red Sox
hat on fire and held it up on a pole.
The amazing thing was when that a** hole Scooter got a woodie over it.
=Bob=
|
29.451 | | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:58 | 31 |
| re CT DMZ:
Nope, nobody's really going bonkers over much of anything down
here except the possibility of a_incomeTax and our lack of a
budget.
It's a mess, really, and I figure that no matter what happens
the Old Chainsaw will be bendin' over as far as he can, grabbing
his ankules, and hopin' the State at least uses Vaseline....
Us young single folk who work hard for that paltry salaries we
get will bear the brunt of paying for the years and years of
fiscal mismanagement, and the year of old Rummy O'Neill's
administration getting fat.
Other than that, not much is happening.
The hottest SPORTS topics down here of late are the GHO, which
was a rousing success with all the Pros getting HUGE woodies over
the redesigned course (even I had a modest woodie), and
the Nutmeg Games.
The Nutmeg Games pit athletes from the four regions of the State
East West North South, against in other, in a plethora of
Sports. They'll run from today through the end of the weekend...
Just in case anyone was interested....
'Saw
|
29.452 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TheFew,TheProud,TheBonehaids | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:59 | 4 |
| Rich, Jeff Gray had a case of JoeMorganis (i.e. a brain spasm)
he should be all right.
/Don
|
29.453 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:04 | 8 |
| Thanks for the update, Slasher.
His condition wouldn't have anything to do with overwork, would it?
Seems every day when I check the box scores, Gray and Fossas are
pitching. Doesn't Gray lead the league in appearances or something?
Rich
|
29.454 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | You watch too much TV kid | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:20 | 9 |
| re .453:
Through Monday's games, Gray was the AL leader in appearances with 50.
Heard somewhere that Gray had a similar blackout in college, so I don't
know if recent overwork had anything to do with it.
py
|
29.455 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:46 | 8 |
| One of the Globe writers quoted a Miami sportswriter who compiled
winning percentages for teams in the 4 major sports (hoops, baseball,
hockey, football) over the last 25 years (of course, the Dolphins came
out on top). The BoSox were in the top 10 and were in the top 3 among
baseball teams. The only "Boston" sports franchise that did not appear
in the top 25 was the New England Patriots. The article basically
asked why Boston area fans (other than Pats' fans) were whining so much
about the Cs, Bs, and BoSox.
|
29.456 | | FDCV07::KING | If the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!! | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:52 | 4 |
| Mac, The red SOx were 25th on the list and the fifth baseball team
listed. The Lakers were second and the Celtics were third...
REK
|
29.457 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Jul 31 1991 18:24 | 9 |
| >> Penta (in broad daylight ) we passed a a buck naked filthy dude,
>> stretched out laying on the sidewalk, head crooked in palm ala Joe
>> Namath, wearing sunglasses, smokin' a cigar, drinkin' a Bud, with
>> a sign TAPED on his chest " HELP ME ". Priceless.
That was me. That's Digital's new travel plan. Oh, and you also have to
deduct any money you make on your expense report.
j.
|
29.458 | | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Wed Jul 31 1991 18:31 | 9 |
| >That was me. That's Digital's new travel plan. Oh, and you also have to
>deduct any money you make on your expense report.
Jeff, I'm ROLLWARD!
Please don't say that too loud however. Jack Smith with hear you,
get a woodie, and next thing you know, we'll be selling BASEstar
from the gutter in the Back Bay area.....
|
29.459 | Boston Fans dooing the B & M ??? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Thu Aug 01 1991 00:11 | 8 |
| Mac,
Was the author, by any chance Dave Barry??
;^)
Kev
|
29.460 | The Big House is | CSC32::FARRAHER | Send lawyers, guns & money | Thu Aug 01 1991 02:47 | 7 |
| re. .448
The jail near Yankee Stadium is the Bronx County Courthouse & Jail.
Comes in hand when the Yankee's run a Handgun Night promotion(2.50 off
of reserved grandstand seats when you show your handgun at the
turnstile)
|
29.461 | | CAM::WAY | High-Toned Son of a Bitch | Thu Aug 01 1991 09:03 | 10 |
| > The jail near Yankee Stadium is the Bronx County Courthouse & Jail.
> Comes in hand when the Yankee's run a Handgun Night promotion(2.50 off
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> of reserved grandstand seats when you show your handgun at the
> turnstile)
If it was in Sarasota, they'd all get arrested.....
|
29.462 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:14 | 3 |
| Thanks, REK. I read the article while on vacation with a cooler of
malt beverages close by. I think I read something sometime about brain
cells and alcohol, but I can't remember now.
|
29.463 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dude without a 'tude | Fri Aug 02 1991 10:33 | 19 |
|
Just saw this article a few days late in the Boston Hearall(tm):
A fan had made arrangements with the Red Sox public relations
dapartment to present to Mike Greenwell a painting he had done of Mike
in action. Said it took him almost 200 hours to complete, so he was
allowed to visit the dugout before the game and give Mike the painting
for his 28th birthday. Greenwell, thinking the guy just wanted it
autographed, seemed genuinely pleased when the guy told him it was his
to keep. Greenwell, in turn, thanked the guy and gave him an
autographed bat.
Sometime later in the game, Mike had a bad trip to the plate (struck
out, popped up or something), and his temper got the best of him. So
what does Mike do? You guessed it. He put his bat through the
painting.
Dickstah
|
29.464 | Little Help Please | OPUS3::JACOB | Pete Rose's bat or Rock Hudson's chin??? | Tue Aug 06 1991 21:34 | 5 |
| Can anybody tell me what Cy Youn...ER...Roger Clemens record and era
are for this season so far?????
JaKe
|
29.465 | Was just looking at the sports section | TOOK::BKWAL | | Wed Aug 07 1991 07:39 | 8 |
|
From today's Boston Globe:
Clemens has 12 wins, 7 losses, 2.49 ERA, 170 IP, 40 BB, 151 SO
Bill K.
(Damn I just blew my Read Only NOTY ;-)
|
29.466 | Oh those jokers at 'bcn... | CRBOSS::DERRY | RIP Sox | Fri Aug 09 1991 09:36 | 5 |
| The 'BCN Red Sox funeral procession began about a half hour ago... I
thought I heard that Peter Gammons was to deliver the eulogy???
sniff sniff.., hand me a hanky.
Just think, they could leave Toronto 15.5 or so games back.
|
29.467 | What do you say about a bunch of losers??
| CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Aug 09 1991 14:21 | 9 |
|
I heard teh ulogy on my way to Six Smegma training in MR0. It sucked, just
like the team it was said for. Personally I think this team should be
cremated(sp?), and thier ashes should be put on a rocket with a direct heading
for the sun.
Steve
|
29.468 | Just when you think you've got it figured out... | CRBOSS::DERRY | Stop that bandwagon! | Mon Aug 12 1991 07:29 | 1 |
|
|
29.469 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Aug 12 1991 08:35 | 3 |
| Ha ha ha :*)
lEe
|
29.470 | | SHIRE::ELLIS | Two fat parsons - click, click, click!! | Mon Aug 12 1991 08:39 | 7 |
| Still a third of the season to go, eh!
What happened yesterday with the Sox, Tigers, and Jays?
tks. a lot
rick
|
29.471 | | CRBOSS::DERRY | Stop that bandwagon! | Mon Aug 12 1991 09:20 | 3 |
| Sox beat the Jays, for the third straight day...
Tigers lost 2 to the Yanks.
|
29.472 | tks. karen & thank god Detroit lost! | SHIRE::ELLIS | Two fat parsons - click, click, click!! | Mon Aug 12 1991 09:30 | 0 |
29.473 | parade in October :-) | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:52 | 5 |
| Red Sox conference reports that the Sox have just picked up Dan Petry
off the waiver wires.
py
|
29.474 | Who is Dan Petry? | AGNT99::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:57 | 0 |
29.475 | | FDCV07::KING | Is there life before Friday? | Fri Aug 16 1991 15:01 | 4 |
| Another GODDAM&**^%^%&$^%&*$#%^*(()_*^$^%$&%&**(*(_)^%
Pitcher with 20 plus years in the majors!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
REK
|
29.476 | Don't you just love it when they move that REK likes? | CNTROL::CHILDS | thataboy George, screw those unemployed | Fri Aug 16 1991 15:07 | 8 |
|
> Another GODDAM&**^%^%&$^%&*$#%^*(()_*^$^%$&%&**(*(_)^%
> Pitcher with 20 plus years in the majors!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
REK, could you repeat that please i don't quite thing I got it all...
;^)
|
29.477 | I'm not afraid of sharptooth either! | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Fri Aug 16 1991 16:32 | 7 |
| Sheesh, all this time I thought Petry was the baby
teradactyl who couldn't fly in "The Land Before Time"
:^)
Kev
|
29.478 | | HAVASU::HEISER | in the land of the morning star | Fri Aug 16 1991 16:50 | 1 |
| just don't smoke those star leaves!
|
29.479 | KBD's wagon foot on the pedal, hand on the emercency | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Sun Aug 18 1991 21:52 | 6 |
|
>>> just don't smoke those star leaves!
Yeah save em for the Soxs they need em...
|
29.480 | Tigers coulda helped... | CRBOSS::DERRY | Stormy Monday | Mon Aug 19 1991 10:20 | 6 |
| > -< KBD's wagon foot on the pedal, hand on the emercency >-
(-:
Let's hope that the Jays lose a few more before they get back on
track.
|
29.481 | | SHIRE::ELLIS | Peter Arnett heads to Moscow? | Mon Aug 19 1991 10:48 | 12 |
|
>> Let's hope that the Jays lose a few more before they get back on
>> track.
Oh Oh,
Karen, could you let us know what happened to Toronto, Detroit, and Boston
over the weekend?
Thanks a million
rick
|
29.482 | Tks. just got the results in BASEBALL!! awright!! | SHIRE::ELLIS | Peter Arnett heads to Moscow? | Mon Aug 19 1991 10:54 | 0 |
29.483 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Aug 22 1991 12:46 | 16 |
| The recent success of the Sox indicates a terrible AL East rather than
a good Boston club. When one considers that Joe Hesketh is the ace of
the Boston staff, something is wrong.
In addition, I've got to wonder how Detroit is doing so well. Neither
the Sox or Tigers are particularly good - yet they are on the heels of
the reeling Jays.
The Indians and Orioles sip. The Yankees are rebuilding and the Brewers
are capable of the same things the Red Sox and Tigers are. With the
Jays finishing up their season out West, I look for Milwaukee and
Detroit to fight it out for the AL East crown. The Red Sox will make it
interesting but they have the weakest pitching staff in the division.
Rich
|
29.484 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Knows his way around a G string | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:22 | 6 |
| The Sox still have time to take over first place...
...and end up 8 games out.
Mark.
|
29.485 | yes I told you so... ;^)
| CNTROL::CHILDS | I want a job like Randy West's | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:47 | 9 |
|
The pressure of a pennant race is again upon the Red Soxs and one Roger
Clemens can't win a ball game....
Strange coincidence???
I think not....
mike
|
29.486 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:56 | 7 |
| Mike, you forgot to mention Clemen's previous performance on 3 days
rest.
I must admit I am bothered about Clemens recent propensity toward
digging himself and his teammates a hole. Once he gets through the
first 2 innings he looks like vintage Roger Clemens. During the first
2 innings he can look like Wes Gardner.
|
29.487 | (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | The music never stopped... | Fri Aug 23 1991 07:59 | 6 |
| > first 2 innings he looks like vintage Roger Clemens. During the first
> 2 innings he can look like Wes Gardner.
Not true. Wes was/is a smidge better looking than Roger.
HTH.
|
29.488 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 23 1991 10:07 | 7 |
| It was only a couple of weeks ago that WBCN held a funeral for the Red
Sox. After the Indians handed the Sox last night's game and the Brew
Crew rallied back to defeat the Jays, the Sox are now only 3-� games
back!
I know I shouldn't be getting excited especially since they are now
headed West, but...
|
29.489 | Back to life | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Aug 23 1991 10:35 | 3 |
| Good point about the funeral Mac. Ever see 'Night of the living
dead'? Those zombies walked the way the Sox run the bases.
Denny
|
29.490 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I'm not distorted. Reality is. | Fri Aug 23 1991 11:00 | 5 |
|
-1
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA(tm)
|
29.491 | | HAVASU::HEISER | step into my groove | Fri Aug 23 1991 14:17 | 1 |
| don't worry though, they're just teasin' us again
|
29.492 | ...Upon further review... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:07 | 9 |
| A local station here, channel 56 obtained a home video tape from
a Phoenix resident who happened to be recording when the
Greenteeth/Vaugn battle erupted and it looks like old Greenteeth
was the instigator. Now why the club is taking Greenteeth's side
is open to discussion, but as they say one picture is worth a thousand
words. The truth is the fight was better than the "Match Made In
Hell" they had on SummerSlam.
/Don
|
29.494 | lets have it | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:24 | 3 |
| Yeah, this is as good a note as any for a rasslin' update. I'm sure
REK is waiting on the edge of his seat!
Denny
|
29.495 | | FDCV07::KING | Is there life before Friday? | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:27 | 4 |
| Check out the Red SOx notesfile.... Greenwell should have had that
bat he was swinging shoved up his ass!
REK
|
29.497 | Greenteeth talks the talk, but he cain't walk the walk | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:26 | 1 |
|
|
29.498 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Hillbilly Patriot Fan | Thu Aug 29 1991 11:18 | 7 |
|
I finally had a chance to see the video of the Vaughn - Greenwell match.
Mike Greenwell should be very thankful that Jack Clark was there to save his
bacon, because if he wasn't, Mo woulda put a serious hurt on him.
Chap
|
29.499 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Aug 29 1991 11:50 | 3 |
| Actually, Dreamwell coulda been charged with assault for going after
him wif that bat.
Denny
|
29.500 | Gator popsicle | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Hillbilly Patriot Fan | Thu Aug 29 1991 13:10 | 9 |
|
� Actually, Dreamwell coulda been charged with assault for going after
� him wif that bat.
I'm pretty sure that Mo woulda made a GatorSicle outta him if he
got too close with the bat.
Chap
|
29.501 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:34 | 15 |
| Surprised that there is no action in this note today. The Sox swept
Seattle to remain 5 1/2 games out. They are now alone in 2nd place as
the Tigers begin to fade and Toronto heads West.
Seems Toronto will have the toughest schedule for the rest of the year.
They get to play the AL west where it will be much tougher on them. The
Sox and Tigers, though, get Baltimore, Cleveland and New York to play
with.
Sad really. The Tigers and Red Sox are really not very good yet they
may very well be the teams that battle in the final days for the AL
East title.
Rich
|
29.502 | Put out the lights, the party's over | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Life w/out meaning cannot be borne | Mon Sep 09 1991 15:43 | 14 |
| I disagree that the AL West is tougher at this time of year.
Teams like Kansas City, Texas, Seattle, and California will most likely
be looking at their rookies the last month of the season, since they're
just playing out the string. Only Chicago, Oakland, and Minnesota
might play the BLue Jays tough.
Also, the Sox must play five games with Detroit, who is battling them
for second place. ;-)
In order for the Sox to win the pennant, if Toronto only goes 12-11,
the Sox would have to win 20 of 26 games. A very long shot.
NAZZ
|
29.503 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Sep 09 1991 17:18 | 19 |
| Don't care, Nazz. Kansas City is ALWAYs tough as is Texas, at home.
Perhaps California is throwing in the towell but Seattle is still young
and hungry and will play their hearts out. And, with their pitching
staff, they are still capable of going on a 8-10 game streak.
Toronto has shown in the past a propensity to play tight and blow it.
They don't know how to kick a guy when he's down. After a long year,
they will finish out on long plane rides to the West coast and the
soutwest. It will take it's toll.
Yet, I still believe Toronto is the best in the East and deserves the
title. I just can't look at the Tiger and Red Sox lineups and swallow
the fact that they are still in it this late. Give the Tigers a couple
more pitchers and, yeah, I'd like their chances but Frank Tanana? Gimme
a break. The Red Sox sputter along with medicre pitching after Clemens
and Reardon. Joe Hesketh? Nah..
Rich
|
29.504 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 09 1991 17:23 | 7 |
| The Sox are 9-4 against Toronto in head to head competition. Who is
the better team?
The Seattle players are trying to be the first Mariner team to post a
winning record in the franchise history. Don't look for them to roll
over. They have also been a streaky team this season. They just
finished a cold streak...
|
29.505 | don't tease yourself | HAVASU::HEISER | step into my groove | Mon Sep 09 1991 18:03 | 1 |
| it's not worth the stress
|
29.506 | | FDCV06::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:04 | 5 |
| The Yankees are 6 and 1 against the Red Sox...
Who is the better team?
REK
|
29.507 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:31 | 5 |
| How 'bout that crowd in Cleveland lasted night? Over 1,600! Wow!!!!
Thos Celeveland fans really know how to support a team, huh?
Rich
|
29.508 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | For best results, squeeze bottom | Tue Sep 10 1991 09:47 | 6 |
| Rich, the Jays are over .500 vs. their remaining opponents, while the
Sox are something like 12-17 vs. their remaining opponents.
Sox are toast.
Mark.
|
29.509 | | SHIRE::ELLIS | Media PA here I come! | Tue Sep 10 1991 10:13 | 17 |
| Mark, you have it in -1
The Jays are .600 against the teams that they will play their remaining games:
W L
Minnesota 4-2
Oakland 3-3
Seattle 6-1
California 2-4
Totals 15-10
The RedSlobs are done like dinner!
Rendevouz in the Dome in October!
rick
|
29.510 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I'm not distorted. Reality is. | Tue Sep 10 1991 10:32 | 22 |
|
> How 'bout that crowd in Cleveland lasted night? Over 1,600! Wow!!!!
And the real funny part is that they had a special promotion where all
seats were $3.00.
Can you imagine going to a baseball game and having the guy at the
ticket window ask "Where would you like to sit?"
"Oh, how 'bout the first row between home plate and the dugout?"
"Visitors or home dugout, sir? O.K., here's your four tickets, that
will be $12.00, sir."
"Thank you. Oh, while I'm here would you mind validating my parking
ticket?"
"Certainly, sir." "Now," he says as he closes the ticket window and
places the 'back in 5 minutes' sign in front of it, "I'll show you to
your seats. Would you care for a hot dog or beer or anything? I'll
go get them for you if you like. A blanket perhaps? It gets very
drafty in this place. If you need anything, I'll be back in my ticket
booth."
Dickstah
|
29.511 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Sep 10 1991 12:29 | 20 |
| Yeah, Dickstah, I can picture that scene.
But can you imagine what it feels like to PLAY in a stadium that size
in front of such a small crowd? Geez, it must be humiliating.
This is my opinion but I feel that a major league team should draw at
least 15,000 for home games no matter where they are in the standings.
The Indians played a competitive game lasted night yet hardly nobody
noticed. If there is a franchise primed for a move, it is Cleveland.
And I would have no sympatyhy with anyone who cried about them leaving.
We never had less than 5,000 people for a Richmond Brave game this year
and we had the worsted team in the IL. We'd kill for a major league
team as would scores of other cities.
I'm all for tradition and everything but keeping baseball in Cleveland
is apparantly only important to the commish's office.
Rich
|
29.512 | Only in SPORTS are people expected to buy inferior product | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Sep 10 1991 12:38 | 14 |
| Blaming the fans for management failures is bogus at best. Cleveland
has been dismal for years and years. Is this the fans fault?
Ticket prices have been escalating for years, ballplayers have become
more arrogant, distant, and disloyal, yet the fans are still supposed
to trot-on-out to the ballpark to root on the home team.
Bah. It's *good* that Cleveland isn't drawing this year. If this
happened more places maybe we'd actually see a tappering off of
salaries. As it stands today, I can *barely* afford to take my family
of 4 to a Braves game a couple_times a year, and we've got some of the
most reasonable ticket prices in either league.
- ACC Chris
|
29.513 | as Emily said "never mind"... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Inbread quilty catching up with Dan-l??" | Tue Sep 10 1991 12:47 | 9 |
|
well if you'd stop wasting your money on the poop sheet, carolina blew,
tarheels forever. etc. you'd be able to afford take your family more
often...
oh I forgot when you can't win championships you have to get your jollies
over the recruiting war stories...
;^)
|
29.514 | Try Fenway or Shea Sometime | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Sep 10 1991 14:46 | 35 |
| Chris -
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOUR WHINING ABOUT BRAVES TICKETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since most contributors to this file are from New England and Colorado,
you can appreciate this.
2 weeks ago I took my wife and 2 kids to Atlanta-Fulton County. Paved
parking lots adjacent to the ball park (which is a couple 100 feet from
the Interstate with it's own ramp) with a cost of $3.00.
On Tuesday nights there is a promo by Kroger supermarkets that gets you
one free upper deck ticket for each one you buy. Upper deck tickets are
$6.00. Bought 2, got 2 free. Total cost (excluding snacks) was a
whopping $15.00!!!!! And, if we wanted to sit in CF, the cost is $4.00
per adult and $1.00 for a child!!!!!
Wow, Chris, now THAT's some serious cash there!!!!
Back to Cleveland......Teams left Boston, St. Louis and Philadelphia
and they averaged more people than showed up at Cleveland last night.
Point is, I grew up in a major league market and I miss the excitement
of having major league teams in my city. You tend to take it for
granted when it's in your back yard. Well, there are many other cities
that can support a team and, if Cleveland's support was eveidenced
lasted night, then I hope the owners take 'em outta there.
You are correct, Chris, about over-inflated egos, salaries, etc. But
don't blame the fans for that. Gate receipts don't come close to paying
the mega salaries.
Rich
|
29.515 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Sep 10 1991 15:14 | 6 |
| Let's not draw too many conclusions about Cleveland from lasted night's game.
It was a makeup scheduled 2 weeks ago. This is a park that has a hard time
drawing 15,000 anyway. A short-notice, Monday game long after the home team is
out of it is bound to have a poor turnout.
j.
|
29.516 | | FSDEV2::MGILBERT | Kids are our Future-Teach 'em Well | Tue Sep 10 1991 15:22 | 7 |
|
RE: Rendevous at the Dome in October
Which Dome? Skydome or MetroDome?
|
29.517 | | FDCV07::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Tue Sep 10 1991 15:29 | 4 |
| Has there been a play-off series that both teams play indoors?
REK
|
29.518 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 10 1991 15:32 | 1 |
| Wasn't there the threat of rain in Cleveland last night also?
|
29.519 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Sep 10 1991 16:13 | 14 |
| There was a threat of rain last night in Cleveland, no baseball playoff
series has been completely indoors, a late scheduled makeup game will
have trouble drawing (a mid-week, afternoon makeup game between the Sox
and Tribe 2 weeks ago drew 14K in Fenway Park) and I believe that once
Cleveland gets its new stadium, support for the Indians will go up.
Between a newer ballpark that's smaller (the sheer size works against
drawing a good crowd) and situated away from the ocean *, it will have
to be a more pleasant atmosphere for baseball than exists now.
John
* - refers to the famous Oil Can Boyd quote from 1986, when he said in
reference to a fogged-out game in Cleveland, "That's what you get when
you build a ballpark by the ocean."
|
29.520 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Mary Ann ROOLZ! | Tue Sep 10 1991 17:20 | 23 |
| Rich -
About Cleveland. With the talk of Seattle moving, despite drawing
~2,000,000 a year - it seems wierd that Cleveland isn't in trouble.
Do you know why? Corporate support, that's why. Cleveland is going to
get a new stadium (or its in the works) - they aleady have sold out all
luxury boxes, etc, to local corporations. Sure, no one from the
corporations may go to a meaningless game in September - but that's the
bottom line.
Truth is stranger than fiction sometimes.
JD
PS - on another, general topic - I'm sick of Florida and some other
places constantly whining about wanting a pro team - so they build a
stadium and try to steal established teams - ah yes, America at its
best. Covet the neighbors goods. Grease the palms. As far as I'm
concerned, I hope all those cities NEVER get a pro team - let 'em cry
in their milk of magnesia...
|
29.521 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Tue Sep 10 1991 17:22 | 1 |
| JD -- Voice your displeasure. Send them a picture of Burgess Merideth!!!!!!
|
29.522 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Sep 10 1991 17:48 | 39 |
| JD,
re your displeasure with Florida...
From the way you describe it, you would also have had a problem with
Milwaukee in 1952. They had a stadium and "whined for a team". The
Braves drew less than 200,000 in Boston that year and went to Milwaukee
which supported the heck out of them till they left.
I have no problem with the Braves leaving Boston. I DO have a problem
with the Braves leaving Milwaukee or the Colts leaving Baltimore or the
Raiders leaving Oakland or the Dodgers leaving Brooklyn. In all the
latter instances, those teams had broad support. Yet greed by the
owners caused them to jump ship and slap the very people who had helped
make those franchises great.
re Cleveland
For a blue collar town, just how much money can be generated for luxury
boxes? Cleveland, like most midwest/northeast cities, is in serious
financial problems and industry is hurting, too. I also don't buy the
makeup game excuse. Cleveland has radio stations and TV stations and a
newspaper. If the city had real baseball fans, they would have made it
a point to KNOW there was a game lasted night and support their team.
I am sick and tired of places that have franchises that do not support
them. Soryy John H. but the Patriots are in this category. New England,
based on it's past support, condition of stadium access, etc, doesn't
deserve a pro franchise. They have had years to clean up their act and
still haven't. I can support a loser that tries. A trip to a game in
Tampa or Green Bay or Atlanta is an enjoyable experience. Not so in
Foxboro. Lousy parking, the drunkest fans in the NFL.....take the green
glasses off and the place is a sty.
Well, how 'bout dem Sox? Playing the Tigers tonight. Rocket vs the
Banana Man.
Rich
|
29.523 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Mary Ann ROOLZ! | Tue Sep 10 1991 18:01 | 20 |
| Rich -
I guess being in Seattl now, I'm sick of hearing about St. Pete's and
other money grubbing Florida teams whining and crying about not having
a team. Tough. They have spring training (and are stealing away the
Cactus League) - hey the folks in Billings, MT would probably love a
team - but not everyone can have one.
And Seattle falls into the category of a team getting fan support.
About Cleveland - I report what I read. It was in the paper out here
in one of the zillion "Will the M's leave town for Florida" stories.
Remember, though depressed area, the Browns sell out every game, and
that's a lot of folks. The article mentioned that Cleveland not only
receives lots of corporate sponsership, but just as important, the
Indians receive Civil support from the local governments. If the
Indians didn't, don't you think the wolves from Florida would have
already been gnawing at the Indians extremities??
JD
|
29.524 | JD - "haven't been getting any lately"? :*) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Sep 10 1991 23:16 | 1 |
|
|
29.525 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:15 | 33 |
| Rich Brake -
While this more appropriately belongs in the Patriots topic, I will
reply here.
I've never said that the Patriots must stay here regardless of the
level of support. I feel the team must be a winner to be supported,
unlike the Bruins and to a certain extent, the Celtics and Red Sox. I
think it's wrong for the team to be moved if it's not winning because a
losing team will not be supported here. If the team is winning and
isn't being supported, then ownership is 100% justified in moving the
team. It would be wrong for Kiam and company to have not put an effort
in at all to turn the team around. He could very easily have said
"f**k it, I want this team somewhere else, I'll let it stink until the
lease is up and then I'm out of there." To his credit, he's not doing
that. Things are getting better and I think anyone who has been to a
game this year will say that - both on the field and in the stands.
Sam Jankovich spends most of his time during games walking through the
stands and around the stadium instead of sitting in the press box
because he wants to find out what's right but more importantly what's
wrong and how to fix it. I give him genuine credit for that. If the
team was going to move when the lease is up, he wouldn't be doing that.
Bottom line for me is this: If the team cannot be turned around and
moves I will be very, very upset because I'll then believe that not all
possible will have been done to keep it here. If the team is a winner
and isn't being supported, I will be very disappointed but I will agree
with the decision. The team isn't being run for my benefit, it's a
business.
John
|
29.526 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:41 | 25 |
| Perhaps we should rename this: The Boston Red Sox Junk Note ^8)
JD - Speaking of Seattle - I read this morning that the Seattle City
something or other voted 7-3 in favor of buying 200,000 seats for
remaining Mariners' home games. Something about an attendance clause in
the lease. Now THAT is a city that wants a team, although I'm not so
wild about tax $$ going for that purpose.
re John - Whoa, Ninja, Whoa......I agree with everything you said in
.525. My position is that, over the 30 years the Patriots have been in
Boston (New England), it is my opinion that they have treated their
fans like dogs. The facility, parking, etc. I, like you, appreciate NFL
football and will support it as long as the experience is an enjoyable
event - win or lose.
re RED SOX - How 'bout dat Roger Clemens. Two hits the Tiggers and ole
Ellis cums out of a hole and clears the bases with a 3 run double. Heck
of a pitching exhibition last night by the Rocket.
Now da Sox is justed 4 games behind the Jays (3 out in the loss
column). Da Sox is also 13 1/2 games ahead of da Yanks. Da Sox will be
in the Bronx this weekend for a big series.
Rich
|
29.527 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 11 1991 11:03 | 7 |
| Rich, I'm in a lousy mood this morning and what you said got to me. It
made me feel like I felt the New England area had a civic duty to
support the New England Patriots. It doesn't - it has to be earned.
Truce? And now back to the Sox?
John
|
29.528 | The worse sales pitch ever... | ICS::FINUCANE | Traveler of both time & space | Wed Sep 11 1991 12:59 | 17 |
| Just a quick note to add to this Pats thang...
It's funny you said that, John (.527). I work in Corporate Employee
Services and the Pats organization called me and wanted me
to carry tickets within DEC. To make a long story short, the deal they
were offering stunk and I told them, 'Sorry, no can do.' I was then
told by this person that Digital and other business in the area had an
obligation to (financially) support pro sports teams because that would
make your company more attractive to potential employees from
out-of-state. I didn't buy it.
Let's just say that my response to him was polite but to the point.
8-)
Cath
|
29.529 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 11 1991 13:58 | 2 |
| I don't know who talked to you but guess who told the team how to reach
Employee Services ....
|
29.530 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Wed Sep 11 1991 14:20 | 1 |
| Hal Litelocks???
|
29.531 | | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Wed Sep 11 1991 14:21 | 1 |
| Dr. Midnight???
|
29.532 | | FDCV07::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Wed Sep 11 1991 14:26 | 3 |
| DENNY and ?DON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REK
|
29.533 | Where's Da Beef? | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 11 1991 14:30 | 23 |
| So anyways guys and gals, why for no Sox chatter here? Why didn't
sumone tell me to shaddup 'bout the Patriots?
This iz September and da Boys uv Summer in Fenway are making it
interesting............again!!!!!
JD - Where you Bee? Cum on there, fella,. and get on this here wagon.
Markie, Saw-Man, Hawkster, /Donbo.../..come on boys, where's da spirit,
huh?
Will the Rog-man win 20? Is he in line for the Sie Yung? Will Margo Man
win the batting title? How do da Boston fans feel about benching Bruno
for the man from Plantier's Peanuts? Should Clark bar hang 'em up and
should Joe Bore-gan play Mo evry day?
Where's da chatter? 4 games out, gang.....
Now dat I have single-handedly authored the kiss of death to them, on
with the festivities.
Rich
|
29.534 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | BrowardCountyPimpService,erPolice | Wed Sep 11 1991 15:08 | 8 |
| Rich -
Perhaps you don't remember - but I was very optomistic this spring - to
the point that folks wanted me to start peeing in the little cup. I've
felt this was the Sox to lose. So this doesn't surprise me. However, I
feel that the Tigers will win tonight - just a gut feeling.
JD
|
29.535 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Wed Sep 11 1991 15:09 | 18 |
| They are four games out.
But I don't think they can do it. I think they had one too many slumps
early on after the All-Star Break.
Like a marathon runner who slows his pace due to cramping at mile
15, and the hell-bent-for-leather kick he puts on to try and win comes
up short, so to will the Red Sox come tantalizingly close, only to
be a few seconds behind at the tape.
For the Sox to take the division, the Jays would have to stage one of
the biggest choke jobs MLB has ever seen (or the Sox would have to
be invincible...)
'Saw
|
29.536 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Wed Sep 11 1991 15:40 | 7 |
| Rich the last time I was on a Red Sox bandwagon it got four flats
and a Boston metermaid cited it. The Sox management has to be drooling
over what Plantier is doing because they can bench Bruno and not have to
guarantee the third year of his contract. Remember the Who song "Won't get
fooled again"?
/Don
|
29.537 | They'll throw the money around with the best of 'em | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 11 1991 15:53 | 16 |
|
> The Sox management has to be drooling
> over what Plantier is doing because they can bench Bruno and not have to
> guarantee the third year of his contract. Remember the Who song "Won't get
> fooled again"?
Unfortunately, even though Bruno has deserved to be benched for
non-performance (a fact that even he has graciously admitted to), it
appears that with late-inning defensive appearances Sox management is
going to do the exact opposite and allow him to reach his incentive
guarantee. For all their stupidity, being tight-fisted has never
really been one of the Sox' faults...
glenn
|
29.538 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:17 | 33 |
| JD - I know,,,I remember what you said in the spring and I wuz one of
the sceptics. But don't this make you just a little bit excited? I'll
tell ya, the woodie that crept up lasted nite whilst I wuz watchin'
Rojah was incredible.
/Don - Shame on ya, my lad. Ya follow the Brunze and da Celts yet ya
let the Olde Yowne Team fend fer itself in September. I've been burned
as many times, son, but sumthin' keeps calling back. "Rich, Oh Rich,
bend over Rich...."
'Saw - Come on Man. The Mets and Yanks are out of it. The Phillies and
Orioles sip. Da Only team in the northeast dat has a chance is the
beloved Sox. Stand up on your box and beat yur manly chest and cheer on
dem Sox. Get your Matt Young poster out from behind the wall and hang
it up for all to see and adore. Matt Young ROOLZE.
Everyone now, get ready nexted time Luis Rivera comes to da plate....
"Looo-IE, Looo-IE, Looo-IE".
How 'bout dat Tony Pena fella. What a many type guy!
Are we all THAT gun shy? ........... I know..............my name is Dan
Schneider. The Yanks could eat the Sox for breakfast lunch and dinner.
That silly bandbox the Sox play in would not even pass as a dugout for
the great Yankees. Wade Boggs has no woodie. Never has.Never will. He
does, however, survive thanks to the park effect. Wade could not play
for any other team. If Wade played in the national league he would not
have had one hit, ever.
Now!!!! Juices running now?
Rich
|
29.539 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:28 | 16 |
| Rich, you slay me... 8^)
I'd *love* to see the Sox do it.
But you know I was thinking last night, what would I *ever* do if the
Sox were to win all the marbles. I mean, I have NO idea?
I'd be like speechless (a condition which the Chainsaw is *rarely* in)
and I'd be like the high school kid who suddenly realizes his fantasy
and has a live, naked [enter Supermodel name of choice] in front of him
begging him for sex.
No, I'd rather be safe and secure in my own little niche right here, knowing
the Sox are going to do an el-foldo just like always ;^)
'Saw
|
29.540 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | For best results, squeeze bottom | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:37 | 7 |
| Jd, I have to belly up to the bar and order a heaping plate of crow.
I predicted in pre-season that the middle and short relief were
questionable and that the Sox would fail as a result.
Gray, Lamp, Fossas and Reardon have proved me wrong.
Mark.
|
29.541 | Wade Boggs has no woodie! Classic! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:45 | 1 |
|
|
29.542 | Call to Arms | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:53 | 42 |
| A plane is flying over our Richmond office right now. It's writing
words in the sky. Lemme see, it says:
"Yanks still #1. Love, Jim Wardle"
Plus, I just got a strange voice mail message:
"Rich, pacKIt iN, (no kidding, voice mail can differentiate between
upper and lower case) BuB. Sox Blow bIG tIme. YAnks ArE GrEaT. JiM
DINSmoRe."
Now Red Sox Fans. R We Going to stand for this? Huh? Of course not.
Slasher, you are in charge of counter Wardle actions, see? 'Saw, you
have a court order to tap my phone and tape any more incoming messages
from JiM DInsMore. Mr. Boston has come out of retirement and will be
releasing his "Get In Shape Red Sox Fans" video nexted week. JD - You
are head of our West Coast bureau. That makes you the West Coast Bureau
Chief. You get a secretary and a FAX machine. Your task is to ensure
that Twin Peaks remains calm.
Markie - Where are ya, lad? Still pissed at me for saying Bob Seger is
GAWD!!!??? Well, let's put silly things behind us. You are assigned to
watch Bob Gamere. make sure he doesn't jog around the Fenway after dark
Bad publicity, ya know.
Hey Hawkman....what gives? Get in touch with your bested friend, Jeff,
and start writing letters to the editor of every major paper in America
proclaiming Red Sox Resurrection day.
How's about our Southwest Bureau Chief Mike Heiser? Come on, young man,
stand up and be counted. You need to ensure no insurgents cross the
border and bolster the Blue Jays roster. And where is Bruce May? Still
in the Bay? We need you to root on Oakland and sabotage Toronto's water
supply when they play in Oakland. You are also encouraged to praise
Jose's pecs loudly in front of the Jays' dugout.
Come on Guys, Schneid, JimWa and Dinz have initiated an insult to our
manliness. We need to respond and stand up tall behind our Fenway
heros.
Rich
|
29.543 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | BrowardCountyPimpService,erPolice | Wed Sep 11 1991 17:53 | 27 |
| Mark -
THe relief has been a pretty good. I thought that Darwin and Young
would make a difference - but its really been guys like Fossas and
Hesketh who have done it.
Rich -
Y'know, I have a feeling that the Sox can do it - but I admit my
pre-season optimism is dampered byu one thing. I call it the "Red
Sox/Boston so close, so far" syndrome. The way I see, the Sox end up a
game, maybe 3 behind the Jays. The ol' false sense of security creeps
in. All trades are quashed, cuz the Sox won't give up on anyone cuz
they got so close. The No Riskers will win out. The team will be the
same as this year. The same questions. ANd management and the fans
will hope they can crank the ride up again for a decent season.
I really felt before the season that this was THE season for the Sox to
do it. I also felt that if they didn't do it, that they should
dismantle and try to build another team. As I've said, I'd like them
to get radical - go for speed and defense and pitching. Become the
AL's answer to the Cards of the 80's. That won't happen, however.
I do fear, Rich, another season where the Sox provide excitement, some
entertainment, but aren't on the tube come the end of October...
JD
|
29.544 | Need offense as much as pitching! Can kids fill the bill? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 11 1991 18:34 | 40 |
|
> The team will be the
> same as this year. The same questions. ANd management and the fans
> will hope they can crank the ride up again for a decent season.
Not with Phil Plantier and Mo Vaughn around for the whole season. My
feelings are that these two are the real thing, and if management had
gotten them up a little bit earlier when the offense was positively
sucking wind behind the likes of the underachieving Bruno, Burks,
Clark (for large chunks of the season), et al, things might be a
little bit different right now.
But other than that, I agree with you, JD, the Sox need to make some
moves. I'd be shocked if they didn't, though-- Gorman has already
acknowledged the overload at the outfield/1B/DH positions with the
arrival of the two kids and has publicly stated that the issue will
be taken care of this winter. My only concern is that they make the
*right* decisions. The Sox have been active with trades in the past
and badly burned by stupidity in the pre-Gorman years (Sparky Lyle,
Cecil Cooper, Ben Oglivie, Carlton Fisk) just as much as they can be
criticized for inactivity in the Gorman era. I can just envision them
pulling a real boner like deciding that Wade Boggs is the problem with
the team or something like that, too. I can definitely live with a
trade of Greenwell, Quintana, or even Burks (would have to get a CF in
return) for fair value, though...
I can't see where you can say that the Sox have been complacent over at
least the past few off-seasons. There have been some important players
shuttling in and out of here recently, mostly for the worst, in my
opinion (Hurst, Boddicker, Lee Smith). The wisdom of some of the
decisions is certainly open to question. The Matt Young decision
probably fills out the top five slots on that list.
Bottom line is that I give them 4-5 years where they can still put a
solid team around a still-dominating Roger Clemens and make a run at
it. If it doesn't happen in that time period, there's going to be
rebuilding whether people want it or not...
glenn
|
29.545 | | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Wed Sep 11 1991 19:25 | 15 |
| > How's about our Southwest Bureau Chief Mike Heiser? Come on, young man,
> stand up and be counted. You need to ensure no insurgents cross the
> border and bolster the Blue Jays roster. And where is Bruce May? Still
> in the Bay? We need you to root on Oakland and sabotage Toronto's water
> supply when they play in Oakland. You are also encouraged to praise
> Jose's pecs loudly in front of the Jays' dugout.
Bruce is in the desert down the highway from me. I've called Ft.
Huachuca and alerted the border patrol, but all I heard on the other
end was cynical laughter. I love the BoSox, but have been jilted one
time too many. If they win the division, fine. Then they will just
lose to the Twins (who seemed to manhandle them a few times this
summer. I remember scores like 19-2.)
Mike
|
29.546 | No room for optimism | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | For best results, squeeze bottom | Thu Sep 12 1991 08:25 | 3 |
| Sox are toast.
Mark.
|
29.548 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:35 | 7 |
| Forget it Rich! I don't care if the sad Yankees sweep the Sox.
The Red Sox are a team for New England's yuppies, kind of like the
Celtics. The Broons and Pats are the only teams left for us New
England fans who still wash our hands with Lava soap (i.e. a main's
main type of team).
/Don
|
29.549 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:44 | 21 |
| 4/30 Boston 7 at Minnesota 5
5/1 Boston 0 at Minnesota 1
5/7 at Boston 3 Minnesota 9
5/8 at Boston 8 Minnesota 3
7/11 Boston 3 at Minnesota 7
7/12 Boston 4 at Minnesota 5
7/13 Boston 1 at Minnesota 3
7/14 Boston 5 at Minnesota 3
7/18 at Boston 3 Minnesota 11
7/19 at Boston 2 Minnesota 3
7/20 at Boston 0 Minnesota 8
7/21 at Boston 1 Minnesota 14
Record: Boston wins 3, Minnesota wins 9, with Boston winning 2 on the
road and 1 at home.
Runs: Boston 37 (17 home, 20 road), Minnesota 74 (24 home, 50 road).
Stick a fork in 'em. They're done.
John
|
29.550 | Beat Da Yanks | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:58 | 16 |
| Well, now, such sceptecism. The Sox losted last night after a supreme
effort by Matt Young got wasted. Evryone's talking defeatism. Hell,
team, they shoot you for that in Soviet Georgia. Markie, you don't even
get a blindfold and a slice of pizza.
Now Joe Bore-gan's band moves into the Bronx asylum. That Noriega
lackey, Pascal Perez goes for the Yanks against that wholesome lad Mr.
Morton whose sister is a nun and whose father is is sister's father.
Yankee Stadium in September, me boys. Let's get behind 'em.
I'm not askin' for a Denver Bronco type crowd or a brie-eatin', BMW
drivin', Muffy-datin' gang of Docker-wearin' YUPS. Bring back the
Narragansett drinkin', Yaz bashin' gang of old and cheer this group on.
Rich
|
29.551 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:07 | 39 |
| JD and Glenn,
My serious hat is on. In all candor, the Sox don't look to be making
the kinds of changes, from within, that will transform them into the
kind of team we all know is needed for the fuiture. Pawtucket led the
IL in HR's and was last in stolen bases. I saw them a couple of times
and they played old style Red Sox baseball....station to station.
There are no phenom pitching prospects on the farm so any help for
Clemens will have to come via trade.
Pawtucket had the oldest team - age wise - in the IL. Lancelotti and
Pankovits are over 30. So is Jeff Stone, I believe. Mickey Pena has yet
to prove himself and Zupcic is a big guy who reminds me of Bob Allison.
Lot's of power potential with less than average speed. And he started
in CF for them.
I would love to see some creative trading this winter. I would keep
Burks but have Quintana, Greenwell and Brunansky on the table.
Greenwell and Carlos are both .300 hitters so there has to be some
value there. I would like to see them get 1 quality starting pitcher
and a quality OFer with speed out of that deal.
One thing to remember when discussing the Sox, though. Joe Carter and
Ozzie Smith both said that Boston is one place where they wouyld NOT
allow themselves to be traded to because of the racial climate in the
city. This is significant becuase there are likely many other quality
players who feel the same way.
The Sox don't teach speed in the minors. There is no great pitching on
the farm. Sox management seems to be committed to the same style of
play that has characterized the team for the past umpteen years. It
fills the stands and has produced competitive teams for decades.
Perhaps WE are wrong, who knows?
But, in any event, they are my Sox and I'll be behind them 100%.
Rich
|
29.552 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Assassinate Steve Erkel Now | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:08 | 5 |
|
Soxs are out of it. How else can one explain Clemens actually winning games
in September?
|
29.553 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:12 | 12 |
| re .551:
> I would love to see some creative trading this winter. I would keep
> Burks but have Quintana, Greenwell and Brunansky on the table.
Sox could've had Pete Harnisch for the Q last winter.
Quintana and Greenwell could bring a decent return, but the Sox wouldn't
get a box of Cracker Jacks for Bruno with his salary.
py
|
29.554 | Explanation | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:23 | 18 |
| re <<< Note 29.547 by SASE::SZABO >>>
>> -< The man was definitely racin'! >-
>>Rich, send me up a handful of whatever it was that got you going
>>yesterday afternoon... :-)
>>Hawk
Hawk - it's called keg shine. Friend of mine in Lilburn, Georgia gave
me some. Said, "Son, Ya cain't say ya been to Dixie iffin yan haven't
slugged Keg Shine."
It is brewed like moonshine but they put the nectar in a barrel in the
ground for a few days to "add color". Stuff would put hair on Heather
Locklear's chest.
Rich
|
29.555 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:39 | 9 |
| One reason the Sox don't have much pitching on the farm this past
season was they were put right into Fenway with injuries to Darwin and
Young. The Sox had at least 3 teams in their farm system compete in
the post season. They can't be doing too bad down there.
I think the collar is tightening around the collective neck of the Blue
Jays. They dropped their second straight at home against Seattle. If
the Sox had been able to figure out that "mediocre" Tiger pitching
lasted night, we could be looking at the Jays from only 3 games out.
|
29.556 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | BrowardCountyPimpService,erPolice | Thu Sep 12 1991 11:05 | 13 |
| Glenn -
I hope Plantier is the real thing - I haven't had a chance to see that
much - since the SOX aren't on much out here. I'd like to see
Greenwell and Q traded for some pitching - or for a standout all around
infielder - but there aren't too many of them on the block.
And yes, the Sox have made moves the last few seasons - but I guess
what I meant is the moves seem to be same old Sox type moves - even
though I thought Jack Clark was going to be a good pickup - someone to
supply a real power threat and get 100+ ribbys.
JD
|
29.557 | How can so-called "fans" *not* be interested? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 12 1991 11:56 | 22 |
|
> Forget it Rich! I don't care if the sad Yankees sweep the Sox.
> The Red Sox are a team for New England's yuppies, kind of like the
> Celtics. The Broons and Pats are the only teams left for us New
> England fans who still wash our hands with Lava soap (i.e. a main's
> main type of team).
Sorry, Slasher, but all the yuppies jumped off the bandwagon after the
horrendous July. The bleachers have been seriously de-populated the
past few weekend series. I've noticed a sudden absence of many so-called
"regulars", with a lot of new faces out there all of a sudden. Rest
assured, if the Sox magically back into the playoffs or something, I'll
see all those old faces out there again...
I for one have not given up. I don't predict that they're going to
pull it off, but I'm not so serious about it that if they flop again
I'll be too proud to watch the train wreck, either. I'm just going
to sit back and enjoy. With *13* straight games against New York and
Baltimore alone, you can't say it's over yet...
glenn
|
29.558 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Thu Sep 12 1991 12:36 | 4 |
| Dandy Don Merideth said it best... "Turn out the lights, the
party's over"
/Don
|
29.559 | Pennenat Fever Grips Confederacy | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Sep 13 1991 14:58 | 22 |
| Peanuts, Popcorn, Cold Beah Heah............................
Grab a seat and enjoy as the Red Sox continue their assault on the
Toronto Blue Jays.
Lasted nite the Sox jumped on Pasqual "Little Manny" Perez. Gator
Greenteeth came through as did the Peanut Man. Mr Morton looked sharp
thru 6. Greenteeth also stole his 14th base of the season. Donbo Hair
hit a meaningless home run as Joe Boregan used plenty of his bench in
the 7-2 victory of the Yanks.
Now Mr. Gardiner (not a relation to Wes "Jaws" Gardner) goes to the
hill.
Could this be a Braves/Red Sox October? Ah, the words just trickle from
the mouth like foam from a Krueger Cream Ale. Baseball in it's purest
sense, on natural grass, the Braves and Red Sox.
Go Sox
Rich
|
29.560 | more info | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Fri Sep 13 1991 15:05 | 1 |
| Did Toronto win last night or were they idle?
|
29.561 | Go Blue Jays! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Fri Sep 13 1991 15:11 | 1 |
|
|
29.562 | | FDCV06::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Fri Sep 13 1991 15:12 | 3 |
| They had the nite off....
REK
|
29.563 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Sep 13 1991 16:54 | 10 |
| Mike is taking the bait. FINALLY, a lad with the guts to ask a
pennant-race-related question.
My hat's off to ya, Mike ma lad. Welcome aboard. Have some peanuts and
a cold beah. Sox in NY tonight while the Jays are entertaining the
Atletics. Dave Stewart going for LaRussa's squad of manly men against
that gaggle of domers.
Rich
|
29.564 | | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Fri Sep 13 1991 17:08 | 14 |
| > Mike is taking the bait. FINALLY, a lad with the guts to ask a
> pennant-race-related question.
Rich's master baiter skills are only matched by MrT ;-)
> My hat's off to ya, Mike ma lad. Welcome aboard. Have some peanuts and
> a cold beah. Sox in NY tonight while the Jays are entertaining the
> Atletics. Dave Stewart going for LaRussa's squad of manly men against
> that gaggle of domers.
a partial to those big hot pretzels. Toronto will lose tonight, it's
up to the Sox (3� back going for 2�).
Mike
|
29.565 | I'm with ya, Rich... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 13 1991 17:09 | 30 |
|
> My hat's off to ya, Mike ma lad. Welcome aboard. Have some peanuts and
> a cold beah. Sox in NY tonight while the Jays are entertaining the
> Atletics. Dave Stewart going for LaRussa's squad of manly men against
> that gaggle of domers.
Like they say in that ripped-off Old Milwaukee commercial featuring
the Swedish bikini team and other ridiculous accoutrements, it most
certainly does get better than this! This is a real, honest-to-
goodness pennant race, folks, and it's only gonna get closer. I don't
know who's going to win, but this is why all those players play all
those ultimately meaningless games. It's for these oh-so-few
important ones, that's what.
The response to date in Boston has been decidedly underwhelming, I must
say. People in Atlanta are whacking each other with foam tomahawks
like a bunch of lobotomized idiots, and they've got a lot more to
complain about in the history department than we do. I know people
don't want to get burned again, but they were excited in April, so
why not now when the real thing is here? So there were a few bumps in
the road. A hard-fought race is always more enjoyable than an easily
gained one. Besides, one of these days it's really gonna happen, and
why not in a flukish, come-from-behind way? (That's *not* a
prediction, by the way.)
I know, I know; Sox are toast... ;-)
glenn
|
29.566 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Sep 16 1991 10:10 | 11 |
| Sox take 3 out of 4 in Yankee Stadium and now return home to Fenway to
entertain the Orioles while Toronto heads west starting in Seattle
tonight. The gut tells me we will be in 1st by the weekend.
Roger has taken pages from Bob Gibson and Don Drysdale. Someone burns
him, he makes 'em pay.
Go Sox
Rich
|
29.567 | back atcha big guy! | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:07 | 5 |
|
I thought I was gonna die laughing last night when Matt
Nokes fired that ball back at Clemens. :^)
Claybone
|
29.568 | Couple of excitement-filled games this past weekend | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:34 | 14 |
|
> Roger has taken pages from Bob Gibson and Don Drysdale. Someone burns
> him, he makes 'em pay.
Not only did Roger send out an obvious message, he may have sucked the
Yanks into the retaliation trap and cost them the game. A couple
innings later, it looked like Guetterman was trying to give Greenwell
the old kneecap job (either that or he temporarily lost his control
very badly). It was a real weak effort, with Greenwell backing into
the pitch as it brushed the back of his calf muscle, and he later ended
up scoring the winning run...
glenn
|
29.569 | | FDCV07::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:56 | 6 |
| Gleen, Gutterman tossed a soft inside curve to Greenwell, and Greenwell
took the pitch to get to first..
REK
PS Greenwell did not try to get out of the way of that pitch....
|
29.570 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Sep 16 1991 12:03 | 22 |
| A ghame like lasted night's is a classic reason WHY this conference
misses the likes of Jim Wardle and Dan Schneider. You just know that
these two would be in here today whining about Clemens. They would
bring up that game versus the Tigers where Clemens gave up two homers
and then hit Shelby.
In Nokes' case, the Mat Man hit an RBI single off Roger his previous
time up. So Roger sent a message.
To be honest, I hate to see a guy intentionally thrown at. But, again,
after seeing "When it Was a Game" on HBO, I started to feel that
today's batters are pansies. If you have a guy the caliber of Clemens,
Gibson, Drysdale and Ryan (all flame throwers) enhancing their
performances by keeping the batter off guard, then I'm for it.
On the other hand, I remember when Sox 2nd baseman Doug Griffen was
beaned by a Ryan fastball some years back and I recall the hush that
came over the room as we all wondered whether the guy would get up
again.
Rich
|
29.571 | | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:23 | 10 |
| So how did the Jays do? How far back are the Sox now?
> On the other hand, I remember when Sox 2nd baseman Doug Griffen was
> beaned by a Ryan fastball some years back and I recall the hush that
> came over the room as we all wondered whether the guy would get up
> again.
I remember that. Nolan was pretty wild in his younger days.
Mike
|
29.572 | three and a half and counting.... | GEMVAX::HILL | | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:52 | 1 |
| Jays lost to the As, so the Sox are 3-1/2 back.
|
29.573 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Who cares where Waldo is? | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:53 | 13 |
| re .571:
Blue Jays lost to Oakland yesterday; their lead over the Red Sox is now
3-1/2 games.
Toronto is idle tonight while the Sox start a 3-game set at home
against the Orioles. For those Sox fans who've already penciled in Ws
for tonight, tomorrow, and Wednesday, a gentle reminder that Baltimore
is 5-2 against the Sox so far this year (and has a healthy Glenn Davis
this time around).
py
|
29.574 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:52 | 17 |
| REK, the pitch at Greenwell was behind him. I think a batter's first
instinct is to step back when a pitch is coming at him. Even the ESPN
announcers said Greenwell had nowhere to go. It was good to see a
batter trot to first for a change rather than charge the mound
(especially considering this could have been retaliation). Nokes
throwing the ball back at Clemens was bush. Clemens jawing at him when
he reached first was also uncalled for -- he should have just drilled
him with a pickoff throw ;^).
Rich, there is a big difference between pitching inside and
headhunting. Unfortunately fans, batters, and umps these days don't
understand that.
Sox and Jays both lost last night.
Paul, next time you see that oriole in your backyard, do all Sox fans a
favor and chase it away for the next few days.
|
29.575 | Pennant fever grips Deliverance Dude... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 18 1991 17:00 | 30 |
|
I went to the Sox game last night, and while it was an excellent game,
I'm pretty positive that I had the Deliverance Dude's dad (DDD?) next
to me (or maybe his uncle, or both). From the earlier descriptions, I
don't think it was the 'Dude himself, because he seemed a little older,
but not too much older, maybe only ten or twelve years or whatever's
biologically feasible...
Well anyway, this guy was whooping up a storm on some pretty tame
stuff, like a called strike for Kevin Morton (he called him Morty; maybe
they're related too?) with the count at 2-0. He kept leaning over and
repeating stuff to me, too, like "Cleveland's beating Detroit, 3-1",
even though I could see the score too and had already told him the
first time that I was more concerned about Toronto right now. Then,
late in the game, he asked me who was warming in the bullpen.
"Reardon", I replied. A half-inning later, it was "guess who's coming
in next inning?" Still later, in the top of the ninth, it was "guess
who's coming in *now*?" Uh, gee, lemme guess now, could it be...
Reardon?
Didn't hear any "Eeeeeee, eeeeee, eeeeees", though, except appended to
the end of Luis Rivera's name. He had the "Loueeeeeeee, Loueeeee" down
pretty well.
Late in the game the guy tells me he doesn't even have a ticket to the
game. Apparently some cop he knows lets him in and he sits anywhere.
Go figure...
glenn
|
29.576 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 18 1991 17:06 | 3 |
| It was nice to see a Sox player get the benefit of Pesky's Pole for a
change. It seems like the opposition always gets the benefit of the
short porch in RF.
|
29.578 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:06 | 3 |
| Sox are still 2.5 out as they hung on to win 7-5 over the O's last
night. Toronto blew a 1-0 lead the M's in the 8th last night, but came
back to win the game in 12 innings.
|
29.579 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:17 | 4 |
| Ch 4 reported lasted night that the Sox are trying to pry Dewey away
from the O's for the stretch drive. Seeing as how the OFers are
dropping like flies this might not be a bad idea.
Denny
|
29.580 | No DEWEY...DEWEY...DEWEY this year | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:24 | 5 |
| IF someone Out there has the schedule and the time could they enter
who the Redsox have Left (h-a) and who toronto has left as well.
Thanks. On the Dewey note, I wouldnt come back to the Sox's if I
were him. The Deal would have to include next season !!!
MaB
|
29.581 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:25 | 4 |
| Too bad Dewey wouldn't be eligible for post season play should the Sox
get him and pass Toronto in the standings. It sure would be nice to
give Evans one more chance at a WS ring after a long and productive
career.
|
29.582 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:24 | 10 |
| Sox: 9/20-9/22 New York, 9/23-9/25 at Baltimore, 9/27-9/30 at
Milwaukee, 10/1-10/3 Detroit, 10/4-10/6 Milwaukee.
Jays: 9/20-9/22 at Oakland, 9/23-9/25 at California, 9/27-9/29
Minnesota, 9/30-10/2 California, 10/4-10/6 at Minnesota
Tigers: 9/20-9/22 Milwaukee, 9/23-9/26 Cleveland, 10/1-10/3 at Boston,
10/4-10/6 at Baltimore
John
|
29.583 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:24 | 4 |
| Heard this AM that Greenwell may be back next week. A strained
ligament, I believe.
Lee
|
29.584 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:37 | 4 |
| According to Doc Pappas, Greenwell's knee injury is not the cartilege
tear they suspected, but rather a ligament strain as Lee said.
Ironically it is not the knee injury which will keep Gator out, but
rather a severe groin pull he suffered on the same play.
|
29.585 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 26 1991 16:04 | 3 |
| The Sox win the first half of the twinbill in Baltimore 2-1. Clemens
pitches a complete game for his 18th win of the season. Pretty soon
even Mike Childs will be rooting for Roger to get his 3rd Cy Young ;^)
|
29.586 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JohnHendry-99and44/100% objective | Thu Sep 26 1991 16:35 | 7 |
| Sox better win that second game or they're toast. Is it just
coincidence that when the Boggs and Greenwell came back the Sox
started losing? Is it possible that when the team has guys that
were managed by Butch Hobson in the lineup they're a better team?
Hmm...
/Don
|
29.587 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Sep 26 1991 16:39 | 11 |
| re: -1,
/Don, Your shot at Boggs in the previous reply is bogus!!! Boggs
missed what, 2 games?? He was there for their 30 wins in 40 games
run...and hit about .380+ during it. Seems to me that when Boggs is
doing well, the Sox do well.
Hope this hurts,
Nelly
|
29.588 | they'll probably tease us until the last game of the year | HAVASU::HEISER | hold me, I'm a fermata | Thu Sep 26 1991 17:41 | 1 |
| are they 1� back now? Is Toronto still in Anaheim?
|
29.589 | I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna bleepin' take it anymore! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 26 1991 20:26 | 15 |
|
I'm afraid it really *is* all ovah but the cryin' now. Unbelievable.
In a can't-lose game the Sox blow a 5-1 lead and finally lose in the
bottom of the ninth, 6-5. Reardon is apparently incapable of going in
a *real* emergency save situation, and with a spent Greg Harris on the
mound Joe Morgan has *nobody* in the pen warming until it's completely
obvious that Harris is done. Even then, he's allowed to go ahead and
walk the last two batters, forcing in the winning run.
My dad called me from DC five minutes after this game was over and
asked if Morgan had been fired yet. The guys on the HTS network
couldn't believe what they were seeing, I guess.
glenn
|
29.590 | | FDCV06::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Fri Sep 27 1991 09:04 | 10 |
| Now that the Rex Sox snatched defeat from the jaws of victory lets
get down to basic math....
If Toronto goes 5-4 in its remaining 9 games that will mean the
Red Sox will have to go 8-2 just to tie......
REK
Rosanne Arnold has been spotted going down the Mass Pike towards Fenway
park with a wide-load sign on her butt... And she has a 10 piece band
on board with her warming up....
|
29.591 | Now *those* are the Red Sox I'm used to... 8^) | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Fri Sep 27 1991 11:13 | 1 |
|
|
29.592 | sigh. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Dial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463 | Fri Sep 27 1991 12:46 | 17 |
| Typical. We were taken for a ride AGAIN!
And next year, this team will be the same. Changes won't happen. WHy?
Well Lou and the boys will say "Look, we came *so* close last year, and
we had injuries, and the kids are really ready, and blah blah..."
And we will eat it up, once again. And the park will be filled. And
the SOx will take us for another ride.
Rooting for the Red SOx is like getting a free ride on the Eternal
Ferris Wheel of life. However, you never get off, you either keep
going around in circles, or get stuck right *NEAR* the top - always
longfully looking at the guy stuck at the *TOP* with the good looking
babe, while you are with your sister, a warm coke, and a dry box of
popcorn.
JD
|
29.593 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 1-900-FISHER-OF-MEN | Fri Sep 27 1991 12:50 | 6 |
| Think the Sox will try to get Mariano Duncan as a free agent?
They need a shortstop and this guy can play the position and hit.
Wrong skin tone for a Sox free agent acquisition though. They prefer
to prusue guys that are "a whiter shade of pale". 8^(
/Don
|
29.594 | | CAM::WAY | RIP Dr. Seuss | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:05 | 13 |
| > Wrong skin tone for a Sox free agent acquisition though. They prefer
> to prusue guys that are "a whiter shade of pale". 8^(
As Billy Connelly says in his comedy special: "A pale blue Scottish person"...
re JD:
What an analogy. You should be writing novels my man...
'Saw
|
29.595 | | CELTIK::JACOB | MummifiedManInAustriaIsJimmyHoffa | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:09 | 16 |
| Whilst watching SportsCenter this AM on ESPN, after the bit on the Sox
blosing the 5-1 lead in the bottom of the ninth, and the pitcher(can't
remember his name) walking in the winning run, they interviewed the
pitcher and he said the problem was the umpires, not his. He said the
Umpire was giving up on the guy's breaking ball early and calling it a
ball, no matter where it went.
Joe Morgan also backed up his pitcher.
IMHO, the guy should've thrown REAL strikes and not ones in his haid,
and Morgan should've yanked the guy a batter or two earlier.
Blame the Ump, did the guy go to Clemsuck or somethin???????
JaKe
|
29.596 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:14 | 7 |
| � Whilst watching SportsCenter this AM on ESPN, after the bit on the Sox
� blosing the 5-1 lead in the bottom of the ninth, and the pitcher(can't
� remember his name) walking in the winning run,
The lead had been whittled away to 5-4 by the time the 9th inning
started. Greg Harris was the pitcher. Reardon was out due to a stiff
neck (gee, how's Lee Smith doing these days?).
|
29.597 | Ouch | SHALOT::HUNT | Don't forget the coffee !!! | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:23 | 20 |
| The Billy Connolly special on HBO is a riot.
I was rolling when he was describing how dogs "do it" the right way.
"C'mon, lads, everybody join in !!!"
Methinks Sox fans have already packed their bags. Sure, yesterday's
loss was oh-so-familiar but we're talkin' Blue Jays here. They
haven't salted it away yet either and they have their own famous
Snuff Chokes, too. "1987" still rings loud and clear in their ears.
Still, couldn't help but wonder if Elrod Hendricks wasn't somehow
smiling as Harris heaved ball four yesterday. Recall the Fenway
Faithful were giving the O's the "Choke, choke!" cheer two seasons
ago as the Birds came miraculously close to winning the East.
Hendricks shot back that the Sox fans certainly knew that they were
talking about. Yes, indeed.
Bob Hunt
|
29.598 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 1-900-FISHER-OF-MEN | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:35 | 9 |
| Well Bob, in fairness this team did come back from 11� games out to
make a race out of it without their best setup man (Jeff Gray) and without
the services of Danny Darwin. The thing that bugs me is that the day after
they tied the Blue Jays in the loss column (� out overall), Morgan has
managed like he's scared to lose. Sunday he puts in (Door)Matt Young and
yesterday he leaves in Harris way to long then whines about the umpire's
calls. But this run at first place has saved his job for another year. 8^(
/Don
|
29.599 | Can they do it ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Don't forget the coffee !!! | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:41 | 10 |
| You're right, Slasher, they did indeed close a big gap in a big
hurry. And they started to close the 11� game gap with a big series
against the Blue Jays in early August, if I recall.
Lotsa folks were speculating that the gap would be 15� by the time
the Jays series was done. Sox deserve mega credit for closing this
far. But, as in "Top Gun", there are no points for 2nd place, as
you so well know ...
Bob Hunt
|
29.600 | see ya thursday for the final nail... | CNTROL::CHILDS | UpthrutheCracksOutthruthebrokenGlass | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:01 | 9 |
|
Like Bob said remember 87? Naw why don't you guys forget it. It's more
fun watching you guys praise, beat, slash, write off/on Joe's bums...
:^)!!!!!!!!
Is Boggs still sitting out protecting his batting average???
mike
|
29.601 | he did play yesterday | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:04 | 3 |
| � Is Boggs still sitting out protecting his batting average???
Why would he? He's in second place in the batting race behind Franco.
|
29.602 | his stripes have been reveal before... | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:25 | 8 |
|
Simple:
Give Franco a week to drop. If he doesn't then attack him for a
week. If he doesn't catch him he can plam the layoff. We are talking
about Wade aren't we?
mike
|
29.603 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:31 | 4 |
| � -< his stripes have been reveal before... >-
Only in the mind of Dan Schneider. Hey....wait a minute....are you
playing front man for Schnide?
|
29.604 | Been quiet huh? | SALEM::DODA | With autumn closing in... | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:42 | 4 |
| Mike's just pissed that the Rocket's got another Cy under
wraps...
daryll
|
29.605 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:12 | 7 |
|
He ain't got wrapped up yet. If he gets it, it's because he gets so much
overhyped press. He was awesome out of the gate sucked pondwater in the
middle and is suddenly hot again. I would think a more consistant pitcher
like Mark Langston or Jim Abbott deserves it more....
mike
|
29.606 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:20 | 5 |
| C'mon Mike, put your personal bias aside for a moment. Roger Clemens
is in the #1 or 2 slot in each of the categories used to judge starting
pitchers, ERA, Wins, Ks, BA against, IP, Complete Games, etc. Most
pitchers in the AL would have loved to be sucking the same pond water
Clemens did in the middle of the season.
|
29.607 | uh-huh | SALEM::DODA | With autumn closing in... | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:21 | 4 |
| Nice but Langston got his haid handed to him a couple of days ago
and Abbott couldn't buy a win for the first month of the season.
daryll
|
29.608 | Too damn many heartbreakers this season... | ARWEN::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:28 | 21 |
|
Way too funny, Mike. A 6-0 start and a 6-0 finish (to date) with an
ERA of around 1.00 combined over those stretches, with a "pondwater
sucking" 6-8 oreo middle of an ERA of around 3.25. Yeah, you're
better off finding someone more "consistent".
The big problem with this edition of the Sox, in spite of the comeback,
is that they woefully underachieved through the beginning of August.
I know JD won't like this, but last year's team *did*
uncharacteristically overachieve (with great pitching backed by
precious little run scoring, combined with mucho clutch performances in
the tough ones-- check out the record in one-run decisions). This
year's team has lost so many close games that were seemingly in the
bank and has been victimized by enough bouts with stupidity by the
manager that thinking about where they *should* be but how close it
appears they'll fall short almost makes you wanna cry...
Ain't over till it's over, though.
glenn
|
29.609 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Kids are our Future-Teach 'em Well | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:46 | 10 |
|
While it's still going to be tough I think the schedule still favors
the Sox. The Jays have to face Minnesota for 3 days at home and then 3
with the Angels before finiishing with 3 in Minnesota. That's 6 games
against the winners of the AL west and the last 3 on the road. The Sox
get 4 games against the sub .500 Brewers in Milwaukee and then come
home to finish with 3 against detroit(who've lost 7 of their last 10)
and 3 more with the brewers.
|
29.610 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Dial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463 | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:49 | 8 |
| If the Sox pull it out, Clemens wins easily. If they don't, I hope
Erickson gets it, or someone else from Minnesota. If Clemens gets it
then, it won't be too surprising. Hype and bigger markets always win
over smaller markets (see Valenzuela over Seaver, 1981...)
Plus, the voters are always enamoured by the power pitcher...
JD
|
29.611 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Fri Sep 27 1991 15:51 | 10 |
|
yeah but what you guys fail to include and realize is that ROGER is the
beneficiary of the largest strike zone on the planet. Hey I ain't say
he isn't good but he's not the Greatest. He gets way to many gifts for
me to consider him great. Toss in his personality and line of excuse
(after he snaps the loosing streak we hear about tendenitis) and for
me you have as Big Russ Thompson would say a "Waste of Skin"....
mike
|
29.612 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:01 | 5 |
| Yeah, right Mike. After his runin with Cooney lasted year his strike
zone must be up to the size of a matchbook by now.
The Twins will coast as soon as they clinch. Even the Jays will be
able to beat them then.
Denny
|
29.613 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:02 | 14 |
| Mike, has it ever occurred to you that Roger Clemens has *EARNED* that
large strike zone by his great performances in the early part of his
career. Let us face it, whether we like it or not, the great
performers in baseball earn a certain amount of respect from the Men in
Blue. For example, Ted Williams would seldom get a strike called on
him if he didn't swing at the pitch. Does that diminish his
achievements? I don't think it diminishes Roger's - he's earned that
respect. His personality has nothing to do with it, or shouldn't.
I have no complaint with the way the Sox have played since August 7.
It was the 3 month stretch from May 17-August 7, when they went 31-51,
that will ultimately kill them.
John
|
29.614 | | CAM::WAY | RIP Dr. Seuss | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:07 | 18 |
|
The Red Sox go undefeated the rest of the way while Toronto self-destructs.
The global warming trend mysteriously stops, and equilibrium returns.
All off the Great Lakes are found to be clean enough to drink from.
Governor(?) Weicker comes in one morning and repeals the income tax by
executive order.
Jamie Lee Curtis has a chance meeting with Chainsaw, gives up her family
and acting, and yearns to follow his rugby career.,...
Yup, the Dead must be in town again........
|
29.615 | can't get it up against the sub-500 teams | CSCMA::FINIZIO | Hey Get a grep on it | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:09 | 10 |
|
All we keep hearing is how the sox will have it easy facing
the sub .500 eastern division teams......in the case of
two of them (Balt & New York) they couldn't take the season
series from them. Why should Milwaukee be any easier? In the
past 6 games they're 3-3 vs sub .500 teams.....
Or maybe it's the Park affects......?
|
29.616 | Sox are much better than Pseudo Sox Fans | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:14 | 18 |
| I believe that the Sox can go 8-2 while the Jays go 5-4. I also
believe that the Sox would/will win the playoff game and go on to beat
the Twins. .....and, until proven wrong...I'm no more incorrect than
all you naysayers.
Further, even if the Sox DON'T come through....SO WHAT!!?? I'm one fan
that appreciates the fact that they are competitive year in, year out.
Being a FAN has NOTHING to do with requiring a winning team!!! If
winning IS a prerequisite for one to follow a team, then that
individual is pretty pathetic IMHO.
Lastly, is there any way for me to program my keyboard and/or 'next
unseen' key to skip any replies from Mike Childs regarding Roger
Clemens?
Thanks in advance for your help......
Nelly
|
29.617 | | CAM::WAY | RIP Dr. Seuss | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:20 | 28 |
| > Being a FAN has NOTHING to do with requiring a winning team!!! If
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
ACC Chris is a FAN
|
29.618 | Yanks sip. | CRBOSS::DERRY | | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:21 | 4 |
| Hey Bob... These are for you, buddy.
GONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONG
GONG...
|
29.619 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:32 | 11 |
|
> If winning IS a prerequisite for one to follow a team, then that
> individual is pretty pathetic IMHO.
I couldn't agree more, Nelly. For instance, in addition to being a
Boston Red Sox fan but not much of one for the Celtics or Bruins, I'm
also a *big* fan of North Carolina football, but I can't stand their
basketball team. Some things go deeper than winning or losing...
glenn
|
29.620 | Go Sox! (Yes, I'm a FAN.) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:45 | 6 |
| I'm curious W-main (tm). Why the love for Carolina football? Does
this date back to our Lawrence Taylor glory years, or is this a recent
phenomenon. (Like, is Mack Brown your distant cousin or somethin' ...)
- ACC Chris
|
29.621 | ;^) | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:48 | 9 |
| When was the last time the Sox won the World Series?
1918
What other memorable event happened in 1918?
The Russian Revolution
Bet the farm on the Red Sox!!!!
|
29.622 | I thought the Russian Revolution was in 1917. | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:50 | 0 |
29.623 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:55 | 4 |
| � -< I thought the Russian Revolution was in 1917. >-
It sounded good after a few post-practice beers last night. I guess I
better call my bookie and cancel that bet ;^)
|
29.624 | | CAM::WAY | RIP Dr. Seuss | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:58 | 14 |
| > It sounded good after a few post-practice beers last night. I guess I
> better call my bookie and cancel that bet ;^)
Well, I was a good boy after practice. I had three glasses of ice
water and a pint of ginger ale.
I've lost six pounds of late.
The Sox stand as much chance of winning the series as I do of discovering
how to beam people around a la Star Trek.....
'Saw
|
29.625 | | FDCV06::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Fri Sep 27 1991 23:45 | 6 |
| Saw, you could save DEC with that invention!!!!
BTW, Jays win tonight and the Sox are behind 7-2 in the top of the
7th.......
REK
|
29.626 | Nelly hit the coma key above the enter on the little keyboard... | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:11 | 8 |
|
John, why should they? I think this attitude of they've earn the respect
is BS. Ok throw the personality crap out of it but Cooney's tossing out
of Roger last year was the best thing that ever happened to Roger cause
the Umps treated him with kid gloves this year. Nice strike zone and they
allowed him to throw at batters without repercusion....
mike
|
29.627 | Dead Sox | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:26 | 7 |
|
They did it again...
Thye gave the fans just enough to make us think thye had a chance, and
then blew it. This time it wasn't in the playoffs at least.
=Bob=
|
29.628 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dr. Seuss, M. Davis, R. Sox | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:40 | 2 |
|
|
29.629 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:43 | 36 |
| Mike, I'm not saying I agree with the psychology of umpiring but it's
something that exists, it's known, the players understand it and
respect it. It happens in other situations too. Take, for example,
the phantom doubleplay. This happens when the shortstop steps on the
bag before even having the ball and doesn't stay on the bag waiting for
it to arrive. More often than not the umpire will call the runner out
because the umpire figures that the runner would have been out anyway
and why get the shortstop hurt waiting for it.
In the case of umpiring around the plate, if a pitcher proves that he
can throw to a certain spot on a regular basis (just off the plate for
example) and the hitters are swinging at it consistently, then if the
pitcher throws the same pitch later on in the game and the batter
doesn't swing, then as long as the catcher doesn't have to lunge for
the ball it will generally be called a strike. Why? The pitcher has
proven that in most cases, it's a strike. Umpires prefer to call
pitches when the pitcher has good control - it's less work, less
aggravation and more consistent. The pitcher who can throw strikes
consistently will tend to have a bigger strike zone.
In Roger's case, when he can establish the high fastball and the batter
is swinging at it and he has his good control then it will be called a
strike.
A good player in any sport (basketball and baseball are perhaps the
worst) earns respect from the officials and they get more of a break
than a mediocre player. Right or wrong, that's they way it is and the
players learn to adjust to it. As long as it's consistent I have no
problem with it, and the players all understand it and adjust to it.
Fair? Not completely. Understandable? Yes. Acceptable? To me, yes.
John
PS - Sox must go unbeaten to force a tie if Toronto wins 2 games. Sox
must win 6/7 if Toronto wins 1 game and must go 5-2 if Toronto goes
winless. Stick a fork in them.
|
29.630 | Enjoy him now, there won't be another soon... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:03 | 16 |
|
Assuming Mike's not just yanking chains, he should consider one thing.
While Roger Clemens is not the greatest pitcher of all time, he is the
greatest in the game today and has been for at least five years. Even
if you're not a Sox fan, if you're a baseball fan and you live near
Boston you should appreciate that FACT for what it means and derive any
possible enjoyment out of it that you can. The odds and common sense
say that when Clemens goes, it will probably be the 22nd century before
you ever see Boston holding the game's best pitcher over such a
significant period of time again...
This being Boston, though, undoubtedly many of Clemens' biggest fans
will only emerge long after he's hung 'em up...
glenn
|
29.631 | Hate to say I told you so, but... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:20 | 1 |
|
|
29.633 | not sure about playoff record | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:00 | 22 |
| <<< Note 29.632 by CNTROL::CHILDS "thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls" >>>
-< not sure about playoff record >-
John, for you it's acceptable for me it's not unless of course it's
Larry leaning into his defender to rub him off. ;^) You're correct
(nothing new here) that it's allowed everywhere even in the holy bastin
of college bball where a certain bum ass coach can walk halfway out
on to the court without getting a T...
Glenn, yes when it comes to Roger my main emphasis is chain yankin but
I still don't buy him as the best pitcher in the game today. Maybe best
power pitcher but not best pitcher. My personal favorite for that honor
is "Sweet Music". I like a guy who can throw all the pitches not just
the fast ones. Also I don't see how you can label the guy "the greatest"
when he has yet to win a post season or world series game?
mike
|
29.634 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:07 | 12 |
| � I still don't buy him as the best pitcher in the game today. Maybe best
� power pitcher but not best pitcher. My personal favorite for that honor
� is "Sweet Music".
You mean the guy who won his first game since Aug. 8th last night?
Clemens has pretty good control of a slider, splitfingered fastball,
and a curveball. When with the Sox, Tom Seaver called Clemens a
pitcher, not a thrower and he should know.
Post season W/L (or regular season W/L for that matter) has alot to do
with the production of the rest of the team.
|
29.635 | As the evidence overwhelmingly supports... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:44 | 17 |
|
> Post season W/L (or regular season W/L for that matter) has alot to do
> with the production of the rest of the team.
Like if that <unmentionable> Calvin Schiraldi had held on to either of
the two leads he was given in Game 6 of the 1986 World Series. If he
had held the original lead Clemens gave him after seven innings, Clemens
would have posted wins in the deciding games of both the ALCS and WS
(giving up one and two runs respectively), and they'd both be heroes
today. Alas...
Still, Clemens' overall performance in the postseason (he has won a game
in spite of Mike's claims) is only average. Those seven starts don't
change my total assessment of him as the best in the game today, though.
glenn
|
29.636 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dr. Seuss, M. Davis, R. Sox | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:49 | 15 |
|
The bandwagon rolled out of Kenmore Square on it's final run of the
season. The old calliope would be silent for the season, and the
wooden wheels that rumbled over the cobblestones were not nearly enough
to drown out the shrill singing of the fat lady around the corner.
Dogs came out of the alleys to bark at the rickety contraption and nip
and the fetlocks of the tired horses as they wearily sauntered down
Commonwealth Ave. "Last stop," croaked the aqualunged driver as the
remaining passengers disembarked for their new destination outside the
Boston Garden. "Broon fans to the left, Celtic fans to the right.
Thank you for joining us, and have a good winter."
Dickstah
|
29.637 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:49 | 7 |
|
Like I said Glenn, I wasn't positive if he had or hadn't won a post season
game.
So what Mac? How many games did His Highness win in August? Everyone has
slumps. A slider is still a power pitch in my book and a curve at 80+ is
still a power pitch.
|
29.639 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is Paris Burning? | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:59 | 28 |
| Over the lat 5 years, Clemens may be the best, but in individual years,
there are other pitchers I'd take.
And I'd start with the 88 Orel Hershiser. He became unhittable down
the stretch, through the playoffs, and into the series. He carried the
Dodgers to the Series win on his back. And that's something truley
great athletes can do. Roger Clemens has not done that. Ever.
He seems to start great, then slump. He reflects the Sox. He puts up
good stats. He gets the fans all worked up. But alas, no champeenship
banner.
I feel SOX fans always have to have a guy they can say is the best, the
greatest. In some way, it makes them feel good. Sometimes I think
SOME Sox fans (notice use of word SOME) would rather have Wade win the
batting title, Roger the Cy and get other awards then win.
I've already seen the 'wait til next year note' in the SOX conference,
and true to form, have seen the 'Sox as Over Achievers' reply.
Typical. I'd still rather have a Series win followed by a decade of
mediocrity, then have 5 years of almosts.
And I've also noticed that Roger has never really lost a game. The ump
has squeezed him, the batters haven't produced, or the bullpen hasn't
held a lead. Good thing he's not in the NL, where he would be yanked
for a pinch hitter and end up with more no decisions...
JD
|
29.640 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is Paris Burning? | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:03 | 18 |
| And just to clarify the Roger greatness over the last 5 years.
If I needed a season - I'd pick Roger. He's been pretty consistent,
and fairly injury free.
If I needed a guy to either win a playoff or a World Series, and could
choose, I'd pick, before the Rocket man:
1988 Orel Hershiser
1990 Jose Rijo
1987 Frank Viola
1986 Bruce Hurst and Mike Scott
Roger wouldn't get the call. Those guys became virtually unhittable.
They rose to the occasion.
JD
|
29.641 | with all due respect, of course | HAVASU::HEISER | briefing for the ascent | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:10 | 5 |
| Re: single performers vs. team winners
I think BoSox fans do that because that's all they have. Cheap
compensation, but its something.
|
29.642 | As objectively as I can state it, perceptions aside | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:15 | 23 |
|
Keep it up, JD, and Clemens will someday join the ranks of Namath,
Lemieux, and Jordan in your personal pantheon of athletes who "couldn't
win the big one". And we'll both be the happier for it, too, I'm
sure... ;-)
No, I have no illusions about this version of the Red Sox. They were
not overachievers. For every game they won when they were beset by
injuries and the chips were down, they handed one away earlier in the
season when there were absolutely no excuses. They're still only going
to win about 85 games, which is pretty pathetic considering even
reasonable pre-season expectations.
But, I cannot realistically see what this has to do with Clemens.
Forget his personal stats or whether or not he'll win 20; I really
could care less about that either. The Sox are 23-10 in games he
started (best *team* record in the league behind an individual starting
pitcher), 59-62 in all other games. That's the bottom line. Guess
what: Roger Clemens ain't the problem with the Red Sox; nor does he in
any way symbolize what is or has ever been wrong with them.
glenn
|
29.643 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is Paris Burning? | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:25 | 15 |
| Glenn -
Hey, like I said, I'd take Clemens in a second. Pencil in 20 wins.
Then go from there.
I have no real problems with him. Though I do see Clemens 'fans'
acting like Jordan, LeMeiux and Bird fans ;-)
Perhaps I have my own version of the KOD.
Yeah, lets see "Jeff Hostetler can't win"
Now, let's see what happens ;-)
JD
|
29.644 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:40 | 17 |
| > I'd take Clemens in a second. Pencil in 20 wins.
> Then go from there.
So would I. Problem with this team is, there's no #2 starter whom you
can then pencil in for 15-18, or a #3 who can be counted on for 13-15,
and so on. Contrast that with the Sox teams of the late 80s, who had
Hurst, Boyd for a couple years, and Boddicker to fill those roles.
re a few back on Calvin Schiraldi:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Sachiraldi got cut by San Diego
early this year, had a brief stint with Texas, and then the Rangers cut
him. Don't know if he's still in baseball.
py
|
29.645 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Mon Sep 30 1991 19:03 | 14 |
| >RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Is Paris Burning?" 28 lines 30-SEP-1991 16:59
> Dodgers to the Series win on his back. And that's something truley
> great athletes can do. Roger Clemens has not done that. Ever.
But Mario has, right, JD?
:-)
Charlie
(yeah, I know, notes before this one made the same point. But I wanted
to say it, too!)
|
29.646 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is Paris Burning? | Mon Sep 30 1991 19:27 | 22 |
| Charlie,
Mario didn't carry anyone on his back. Penguins were lucky that the
Stars got hot and beat the best teams. Best thing that happened to the
Pens last year was Mario's injury. They turned into a real team when
they realized they could win and play good hockey without Mr. Ego
skating around.
Back to baseball:
Paul Y. - agree 100%. But the Sox let the pitching go. And they
won't deal a Greenwell or a Burks for a top notch pitcher. Nor will
they pay big bucks for a real free agent gem.
Yeah, Darwin and Young were tries. But would the Sox go for a guy like
Viola. Nope. Not in my lifetime.
They made the run. Satisfied the fans - competitive, exciting, etc.
The management will do nothing but raise ticket prices and talk about
the shoulda's and coulda's. And the ride will start again next year.
JD
|
29.647 | I don't know why I bother but ... | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:34 | 12 |
| Mike, if you accept that it's OK for Larry to benefit from officiating
then you must accept that it's equally OK for Roger to benefit from the
same and then it can't be part of your anti-Clemens analysis.
Conversely, if it isn't OK for Roger to benefit then it's not OK for
Larry to benefit and you must equally downgrade Bird's achievements for
the same reason.
Or why not just be completely honest and admit that you don't like
Clemens and won't give him credit for anything he does because you
don't like him? That's really what it's all about, isn't it?
John
|
29.648 | I haven't got time for the pain | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:16 | 25 |
| JD,
I'm not speaking for other Sox fans, but I'm certainly not satisfied
or content. Sure the Sox have been competetive since '67 but what have
they won. ZIP. I won't be satisfied until they win at least one. Then we
can start talking about remaining competetive,blah, blah, blah. Also
I could give a flying you-know-what for individual stats ( like Boggs'
batting titles or Clemens' Cy Young awards), give me a CHAMPEENSHIP.
Not denigrating individual achievement but they pale so much in
comparison to the big enchilada. On to next year Sox' fans. They'll
probably break my heart, but I'll root for them and criticize 'em just
the same.
On another vein, JD, your remark about Hostetler got me thinking about
my ex-favorite team, the Jints. You know I used to be a die-hard Jints
fans until the late 60's. Then I met my first New Yawker. See you
later, sayonnara Jints. 8^)
Glenn,
Didya have to go and mention Schiraldi and the '86 series? Anguished
flashback. I have a tremendous headache! Back to therapy. I swore in
'86 if I ever met Schiraldi,Gedman, Buckner, or Mac in person I'd
walk up and say. "Thanks for '86, assh*le", and then duck.
MikeL
|
29.649 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:23 | 22 |
|
John, I wouldn't even waste my time in accepting Mike's premise (that
Clemens benefits from an enlarged strike zone). I personally haven't
seen it. I sit in dead centerfield almost thirty games a season and
have groaned over just as many Clemens' near-strikes that weren't
called as times I've acknowledged the Sox caught the breaks. If it
even exists, this "star treatment" is nowhere near as prevalent in MLB
as it is in the NBA. At least in baseball, in the overwhelming
majority of cases you've got to get the job done on your own merits.
If someone takes your fastball out of the park, there's no
stripe-shirted geek to come rushing in, whistles ablazin', claiming
there was contact on the play and nullifying the dinger to the delight
of the home crowd.
Mike has tipped his hand again with this ridiculous "power pitcher"
thing, too. The surest formula for longterm, consistent pitching
success in the history of baseball is to be a power pitcher. There
are exceptions (like Warren Spahn), but most of the all-time greats
(Koufax, Gibson, Johnson, Feller) didn't throw no lollipops either...
glenn
|
29.650 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:32 | 8 |
| JD, wasn't it you who said before the season that this Sox team was
a juggernaut and trashed on any Sox fan who pointed out weaknesses? Now
you are admitting that the pitching after Roger is mediocre at best.
Sounds like a contradiction to me. I said way back in April that pitching
and defense were lacking on this team and that's still going to be the
problem entering next season unless something is done.
/Don
|
29.651 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 01 1991 11:08 | 5 |
| FWIW, Gorman has said he will be looking for pitching and speed this
winter. Greenwell and Burkes are available for the right deal.
C'mon Sox and Jays. Quit teasing us. Just put us out of our misery,
will ya?
|
29.652 | | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 11:17 | 34 |
| > FWIW, Gorman has said he will be looking for pitching and speed this
> winter. Greenwell and Burkes are available for the right deal.
>
> C'mon Sox and Jays. Quit teasing us. Just put us out of our misery,
> will ya?
Same old same old.
Hell, I'm probably as fast as most of the Red Sox. And Mac, you've
seen first hand how slow the Chainsaw is. I mean, I coulnd't beat
a man carrying a stove in a race to first base.
The Red Sox are always saying they need speed. What they need are
some new owners and a GM who are committed to getting and developing
talent for a contender.
The Red Sox will say they need speed, yet their entire ball game is
geared towards making it up in one fell swoop. Why else have the
Strikeout-in-the-cluth-King Jack Clark on the roster?
Pitching? Oh yeah, the Red Sox have had some GREAT pitching over the
years. In fact, the Sox should win an award for best developmental
squad in the majors. The pitchers the Sox have thrown away who
then excelled are far numerous to list here....
Yup, they're looking for pitching and speed. Only problem is that like
every year the pitching and speed they get are sub-par....
8^)
'Saw
|
29.653 | my final words on his highness... | CNTROL::CHILDS | thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls | Tue Oct 01 1991 11:42 | 10 |
|
John, yes I do think it distracts from Larry's greatness. Just like Magic
and Jordan taking 45 steps before dribbling. It's the reason why I've turned
into a college basketball fan more than a pro fan.
you're correct though I don't like Roger and I will never give him credit for
anything he does. Why??
Because the man is bleeding crybaby. Every time he looses a ballgame there's
an excuse....
|
29.654 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Walk in the Sun | Tue Oct 01 1991 11:52 | 30 |
| re Roger Clemens
I get a howl whenever I hear Sox/Roger fans whine about poor ol' Roger
getting squeezed. ANother reason I RON the SOX conference. Comic
relief.
re /Don
Yep, I thought Darwin and Young would help the team. I thought Darwin
was good for about 16 wins. His injury really hurt them. I felt this
was the SOX year, and anything short of a champeenship would be a case
of underachievement. And that's how I feel.
ANd now we have good ol' Lou saying 'for the right price' Burks and/or
Greenwell are available. We've heard that before. We know what the
Right price. Heck, California could offer Finley and another player,
for Greenweel, and Gorman would say "Nope, we want Finley, Abbott and
Harvey" The Angels laugh - and then Gorman says "They backed out..."
Same ol same ol. What will the SOx do with SPEED? Heck, where would
the Sox put someone with speed?
I think they should sign Mariano Duncan for SS. And get a real leadoff
type speedster for the OF.
I'll believe it when I see it...
Gorman won't take a risk.
JD
|
29.655 | Burks fow what? another CF? | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:17 | 8 |
| Educate me guys,
Greenwell as trade bait I can see. Plantier can step in. But if you're
offerin' Burks, you better package that deal with a centerfielder in
return. I don't think you'd want Housie or Lyons full-time in that
position. Anybody else in their system that could step in? Doubt it.
MikeL
|
29.656 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:28 | 4 |
| Bob Zupcic could play CF at least defensively. Don't know how good his
offense is.
John
|
29.657 | Believe it or not, most of us are in violent agreement | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:29 | 25 |
|
Here we go again. As the Red Sox are generally being villified here
in Boston for the collapse of this past week, JD has propped up his
imaginary Mr. Typical Red Sox Fan strawman, the one who is still
supposedly insisting that the Sox were mighty overachievers on the
whole (at least in between his whines over Roger getting squeezed--
how the heck did that issue get turned around from Mike's complaints to
the opposite?), and is thrashing the living stuffing out of it. Even
though the naysayers like Mr. Brake were right on the money (these
naysayers somehow being the same blind fans who see nothing wrong with
the Sox and who are major contributors to the problem; you figure that
one out) and he was wrong, it's poor Mr. Typical Red Sox Fan who must
pay the price. Yes, all is well and good in SPORTS... ;-) ;-)
All kidding aside, JD, believe me, there is no celebrating the Sox' limited
"success" going on down in Kenmore Square as we speak. Barely one week
ago I witnessed the most savage booing seen in these parts in some
years, levied at Mr. Matt Young and his manager as they departed the
field with the hopes for first place slipping away. The frustration you
feel is the same as *most* feel towards Sox' management and personnel,
the occasional individual you single out is most decidedly in the
minority...
glenn
|
29.658 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:36 | 7 |
| The Sox did not "overachieve". They did not "underachieve". They'll
most likely end up exactly where this noter and most objective/national
observers (as opposed to the Boston yahoos proclaiming this is *THE*
year back in March) thought they'd be, second behind Toronto.
py
|
29.659 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Walk in the Sun | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:40 | 29 |
| Glenn -
I guess since I get most of my news from the SOX file, I feel that
folks are in the 'overachieving' mode again. Yeah, there is some
criticism. But I find the tone in their to always be one of "I'd
rather be competitive than anything else.."
And I guess some comments I read in there stick in my mind, especially
ones voiced by some of the 'chosen few' in that file...
As you know, my other favorite team is the Mets. And boy, did they
do some underachieving in the 80's. But they brought home a
champeenship, and that's a goodness (unfortunately, they did it against
the Sox).
And I do consider the Mets as winning that series, and not the Sox
blowing it or losing it. The Mets were down 0-2 and heading TO Fenway,
but they showed their heart and guys to come back. And with one
strike to go, they did a gut check and got back into it. Yep, the
passed ball by Gedman and the Buckner error helped, but it was only
sheer determination by the Mets that made those things possible.
I want to see the Sox gamble with a trade. I don't care about
finishing over .500, or being able to belittle Cleveland or Seattle
fans. I want a World Series. Anything else is a failure at this
point. Yep, I'm still a fan. Always have been, always will be.
but I've had enough.
JD
|
29.660 | How about Eric Davis? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:41 | 21 |
|
There is no one ready in the Sox' system to take over in centerfield,
including Housie and Zupcic (who hasn't hit well in the minors and
probably never will). One interesting thought I had was to make an
attempt to get ahold of Eric Davis, who has had major problems in
Cincinnati and who they'll almost certainly be trying to move at less
than dollar value. It's a risk, because he's been terminally injured,
but when he's been able to play in the past he's been the kind of
immense talent that Burks will probably never be, and Davis is still
only 29 years old. Who knows, it might not even take Burks to get
him, and it'd be interesting to see how he'd hold up away from
Riverfront's turf and on Fenway's soft lawn (Burks hasn't held up even
then...).
I know, I know, all standard disclaimers about the Sox actually making
an effort to obtain a disgruntled black player inserted; it's just a
thought.
glenn
|
29.661 | | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:50 | 30 |
| There is something almost Wagnerian in the the constant struggle
of the Boston Red Sox, and their fans.
I mean, change the protagonists, change the setting, and you're
reading a novel by Herman Hesse, chock full of angst and seeming
futile efforts.
And JD, in relating this to what you just said in the Sports Quote
note, I'd be willing to bet a lot of money (let's say as much
as the stupid State of Connecticut is now starting to steal from
my pay each week) that when (if) the Red Sox ever win the series,
that the actual winning will be anticlimactic as compared to the
angst suffered by the faithful over the years.
What was it Lucifer said? Better to rule in Hell than serve in
Heaven?
See, if the Red Sox win a series, then the raison d'etre of the
average Sox fan goes right out the window. The Sox fan's major
reason for his/her fanaticism is the slow August fade, occasionally
punctuated by a late September teasing surge.
Take that away from them, and they have nothing.
And I'd bet that in the subconscious of every Sox fan, they wouldn't
trade the sublime suffering they go through for any hollow
Series victory.....
'Saw
|
29.662 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:53 | 7 |
| I'm not sure that Plantier won't turn into a Kevin Mass. After all
he hasn't played a full season yet. Now with Greenwell you're pretty sure
what you'll get. Between a .280 - .300 batting average, 80-100 RBI's,
15-20 HR's, 10-15 fielding boners, 5-10 baserunning blunders and 2-5 fights
with minority members of the team.
/Don
|
29.663 | sick of excellent losses | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:45 | 12 |
| Ha! Good one /Don,
With a Haircut from Hell to match.
Sigmund 'Saw 8^)
NO,NO,NO. I want a CHAMPEENSHIP. I don't want angst, I want one, then
two, three,etc. champeensh. ( do i sound like a 2 yr old or what ).
And, on Wednesday eve. if Toronto clinches, I'll be a-booin' from the
bleachers ( logical or not !)
MikeL
|
29.664 | | IAMOK::WASKOM | | Tue Oct 01 1991 19:09 | 17 |
| I sometimes wonder if being a Red Sox fan isn't more angst than being a
Cubs fan. At least with the Cubs I don't *expect* them to do well.
Several years ago, when they made a serious run, I just knew that it
wouldn't happen. The only issue was when they would die. Now they're
back to their normal mediocrity - which is just fine, thank you very
much. Go out to the game, enjoy the sunshine and peanuts and Cracker
Jack, and go home. Simple.
With the Sox, you keep hoping that they'll finally get that one small
step better. They're constantly the bridesmaid, never the bride.
(Cubs are lucky if they're even in the church!) They've made it to the
"Big Dance" within the living memory of most of their fans. And then
they find ways to *throw the game(s) away*.
Brutal.
A&W
|
29.665 | | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 21:28 | 11 |
| I think that part of it is how many times the Sox have come close.
I don't remember the Cubs being around all that much. The Red
Sox will never come closer than they did in '86.
While JD is right, the Met came back from a 2-0 deficit, the
Sox threw it away with guys like Schiraldi, Gedman, and Stanley.
Names that will live in infamy.....
'Saw
|
29.666 | Clemens Haters take Heart | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Oct 01 1991 22:06 | 6 |
| Roger has given 2 homers and the game is in the 5th. Tigers lead 3-0,
Jays are winning, doesn't look like Roger will win 20, looks like
tomorrow night could see the final elimination. Won't that be ironic
on Fan Appreciation/Noters Night?
John
|
29.667 | Spread on the jam.... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Oct 02 1991 08:46 | 13 |
|
I thought fer sure that Childs' would get reply #666. 8^))))
Mr. "Clutch" Clemens does it again. I wouldn't have felt so bad if
it had been Tettleton and Fielder who hit shots, but Bergman and
Incaligula??? Gawd it was depressing. Maybe the can manage to eek
out a win tonight.
Thank God it's hockey season!
Steve
|
29.668 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Wed Oct 02 1991 09:23 | 23 |
| No, no.
This fits in perfectly with the script.
The Red Sox "Siegfried", their ultimate warrior finally folds late
in the battle.
The stage is set for the lush strains of the Gotterdammerung to
rise over Fenway Park (The Hall of the Gods) this evening.
You will be witness to one of the finest spectacles since the
late 1800's performances of the Ring Cycle at Beyreuth......
Sit back, and enjoy. Let the gestalt of the utter angst wash over
you.
You are Red Sox fans. You're smart, you're witty, and doggone it,
you *like* it.....
'Saw
|
29.669 | They'd better appreciate us! | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:45 | 2 |
| Yeah, thanks alot John. Get us tickets to the game during which the
Sox are eliminated from the Pennant Race. ;^)
|
29.670 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:48 | 8 |
| Well, at least we'll have fun talking cynically about the Olde Town
Team. We'll at least get a free calendar. One of us may even have a
chance to win a car.
For a long time, we were looking at this game as being completely
meaningless, and now it's only partially meaningless. :-)
John
|
29.671 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:59 | 39 |
| Look on the bright side!
How many people can go to a baseball game and get some culture at the
same time.
Think of the WONDER of it all. There you will be, sitting in Fenway
Park, the noble, all but out of it Red Sox struggling away, fighting
the good fight, striving despite the fact that all around them is
the carnage of a season gone bad.
When, out in the Centerfield bleachers, a large, heavy woman, in
armored breast plate, and a Viking hat with horns on it, and long
blonde braids, will rise. She'll breath deep of the cool October
air, and one clear ringing note will be heard across the land the
Pilgrims settled.
Suddenly, a hush will fill the stadium while the note pierces the
stillness.
Fans will share a private moment with their thoughts, thinking perhaps,
back to the days of early April. Some of you may remember the losing
marathon in the cool rainy dampness of Patriots day. Others may
remember a hot July afternoon.
Then, swiftly as it came, the note will die out. But in it's short
lifetime it will have changed the complexion of a season. For the
remaining innings of the remaining games will be to baseball what
a lame duck is to politics....simply marking time till things close
up for the winter.
The Fat Lady will have sung, and you will have been there behold
it.....
Not many people get a chance like that in life.....
'Saw
|
29.672 | | MEIS::SIKES | | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:29 | 41 |
| Re: .640
> If I needed a guy to either win a playoff or a World Series, and could
> choose, I'd pick, before the Rocket man:
>
> 1988 Orel Hershiser
> 1990 Jose Rijo
> 1987 Frank Viola
> 1986 Bruce Hurst and Mike Scott
>
>
> Roger wouldn't get the call. Those guys became virtually unhittable.
> They rose to the occasion.
I'd agree with the '88 Hershiser, and the '86 Scott, but the '87 Viola? Not
exactly unhittable.
1987 Frank Viola G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 2 1 0 1.000 12 14 8 7 5 9 5.25
World Series 3 2 1 .667 19.1 17 8 8 3 16 3.72
1988 Orel Hershiser G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 4 1 0 1.000 24.2 18 5 3 7 15 1.09
World Series 2 1 0 1.000 18 7 2 2 6 17 1.00
1990 Jose Rijo G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 2 1 0 1.000 12.1 10 6 6 7 15 4.38
World Series 2 2 0 1.000 15.1 9 1 1 5 14 0.59
1986 Bruce Hurst G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 2 1 0 1.000 15 18 5 4 1 8 2.40
World Series 3 2 0 1.000 23 18 5 5 6 18 1.96
1986 Mike Scott G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 2 2 0 1.000 18 8 1 1 1 19 0.50
1986 Calvin Schiraldi G W L Pct. IP H R ER BB Ks ERA
champ series 4 0 1 .000 6 5 2 1 3 9 1.50
World Series 3 0 2 .000 4 7 7 6 3 2 13.50
Bob
|
29.673 | | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:30 | 14 |
|
>> One of us may even have a
>>chance to win a car.
With the way the last 2 weeks or so have gone for the Sox, what're they
giving away,
AN EDSEL???????????????????????????/
(8^)*
JaKe
|
29.674 | My car: a metaphor for Sox' season... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:16 | 25 |
|
That homer Incaviglia hit last night was a titanic blast! Maybe the
longest ball Clemens has ever given up. I'll be the first to admit he
just didn't have it. Only the third game all season he's given up five
or more earned runs (Texas, Toronto, now Detroit), though.
Just to give you an idea of what the attitude at Fenway is already like
at this point in the season, another guy from work and I went down
there last night and bought somebody's return tickets, three rows
behind home plate. It's over, and the regulars are obviously fleeing
the ship like rats. We were sitting right behind ESPN's radar gun guy.
The highest I saw Roger register was 93, Tanana 83. Tanana bottomed out
with a 50 mph lollipop that froze Wade Boggs in his tracks. Bergman's
homer came off a 90-mph straight fastball; Inky turned on a 92-mpher (I
missed Fryman's homer).
Fairly rotten evening given expectations for a Clemens' start. I also
managed to damage a tire on one of Boston's infamous bleepin' back
street potholes and the thing blew up on the way home (I was having new
tires put on today anyway, but ain't it great how things just happen to
work out like that!). Not fun. But not to worry, I'll be back for more
abuse tonight... ;-)
glenn
|
29.675 | The End Is near... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | From Here To Eternity | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:17 | 95 |
| STAGE: Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike. A long, king-of-the-road,
touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
domestic that dares to get in its way. It blares its horn at trucks,
which obediently get out of the way. State troopes look the other way,
knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
strange coolness sweep their body. Those foolhearty to stare at the
riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
"EXPRESS: FENWAY PARK"
It rampages steadily, always heading east. And folks in towns it
hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
The crescendo gets louder the close to Landsdowne street it gets. At
the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver. He looks
vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
pocket. A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
be seen through the windows.
Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing. The star is still warming
up - exercising her sizeable lungs. Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant. "Love Beantown,"
Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!"
"LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
apolyptic horseman. Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
"Throw the Ball! THrow the Ball! He can't score from FIRST!!!"
Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!" Their sons and
daughers cry "Jim WIlloughby!" and thier children spit up and wet
their beds, chanting 'Buckner, Buckner, Buckner'
A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
Beantown. In her mansion, the owner feels the prescense of her
husband, his mournful cries startling her - she glances at the calander
- OCTOBER - it sneers back at her. "She's back again, Tom" the old
lady trembles...
In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed. A dark cloud
obscures the stars. No animals move, rats and pigeons holed up until
the inevitable passes. The faithful file in, feeling strangely
germanic and lethargic. In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
collective grimace.
The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
take. The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn. The
road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.
Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918"
A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing - hey guys - those
spirits are going to try to stop us again - "Won't those poor souls
EVER learn!!!" A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the
name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue "Frazee"
The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor. The doors open. The
entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
through the legs of Bill. The star slowly steps down, with
a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
huge booming of drums cuts it off. The lights in the stadium dim. A
spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
the
FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
And to the tune of the "Hallejuh Chorus", she belts out this year's
rendition ....
"OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
From Bar Harbour to WInter Haven, Provincetown to Barrington, the faded
hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter. When the Fat
Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the heart of the
faithful. The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers of
despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top. The only
solance one can take is to peer down at the seats stuck just below -
the one's with those two guys from Chicago....
JD
|
29.676 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:22 | 6 |
| Chilling JD, absolutely chilling.
Polish that one up and submit it to USA Today or something!
'Saw
|
29.677 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Today is a good day to die | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:38 | 5 |
|
Helluva note there, JD!
Dickstah
|
29.678 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | What happened to Walt's What happened? | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:49 | 4 |
| Great job, JD! I don't know how, but you managed to get all of the
ghosts in there. Tooooo funny!! :*)
Lee
|
29.679 | There was something to cheer about last night | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 02 1991 13:36 | 2 |
| Last night Wade Boggs became one of the few players in ML history to
record 40+ doubles in 8 seasons.
|
29.680 | Don't want the glas from the 600 club to fall on me | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:50 | 3 |
| RE: JD's note
Now we'll all be looking over our shoulder for a bus tonight!!
|
29.681 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Kickin this note into the effect mode... | Thu Oct 03 1991 00:19 | 29 |
| re Eric The Red (Sox ?)
Excuse me, but where would they play him ?
:-(
Anyhow, Davis is almost certainly a Dodger, and I predict that 100+
games on grass will do for him what it did for Andre Dawson, and he's
younger than The Hawk.
re Big Game Pitchers
The 1986 Mike Scott was even more untouchable than Orel H. The Mets in
general, and Gary Carter in particular, were *terrified* to see him in
a 7th game. The 88 Hershier was right up there too, so was the 1983 (?)
Saberhagen.
But why did y'all forget the 1989 Dave Stewart ? Sheesh ....
random stuff,
The Sox need to go after Ozzie Smith. He's still the best, and he might
lose some hits on grass, but he'd take even more hits away on D. Plus
he provides leadership and some speed. In addition, I'd trade
Greenwell, move Burks to left, trade Brunasky (if possible), load up on
the pitching, and if you can't sign Eric Davis, go the hell for
Bonilla, Tartabull, or (best of all) Roberto Kelly.
Doc
|
29.682 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Kickin this note into the effect mode... | Thu Oct 03 1991 00:21 | 5 |
| re .675
Unbelieveable.
You ghostwriting for Stephen King ? (Pun intended)
|
29.683 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 08:49 | 7 |
| Well, for those of you who were there, I hope that the Fat Lady
sang REALLY well.
I mean, as long as she's gonna sing, you want your money's worth, right?
'Saw
|
29.684 | A rather enjoyable evening! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Thu Oct 03 1991 08:59 | 8 |
|
She was singin' real good until she was pelted to death by
"Fan Appreciation" calander paper airplanes!!!!!!!
Steve
|
29.685 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 09:18 | 17 |
| Well, now that the season is, for all intents and purposes, over,
I thought we could hand out some awards to the Red Sox players.
The first one that comes to mind, especially from THIS rugby player,
is the
BEST TACKLE of the YEAR
and it goes to
John Marzano
for pulling down that guy before he got to Rocket Roger...
'Saw
|
29.686 | Not one beachball was snared by Ninj | CTHQ2::LEARY | | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:11 | 8 |
| Best singing of lasted night was Kev 8^)
Hey Kev, how many times didya call Mac a fascist?!!
8^)
Great evening!
MikeL
|
29.687 | "Dewey, Suemm and Howe" are on retainer!!!!! | CST17::FARLEY | The Man with 1,000 ID's | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:45 | 20 |
| MikeL,
Not Once did I direct such a slur at dear ol' Mac! They were ALL
directed at the "Youth Police" who were rounding up those pool
beach-ball wackers! I mean, they paid GOOD MONEY ('bout $6 bucks
right?) to enjoin in a little exercise with the cheap seat crowd
and WHAM!!!! all of a sudden they get ejected!!!!
Again, I repeat, I deny your accusation and intend to contact a
lawyer about you slandering my good name!
;^)
Kev_?
|
29.688 | Hey ! Lamp! Gettouttahere! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:08 | 12 |
|
Wait a minute there Kev, I HEARD you call Mac a fascist, and am
willing to testify on behalf of Mr. Leary, just as long as he
countersues and gives me half! I thought the EEEEEEEEE! EEEEEEEEE!
imitation by Kevin was quite good. It's just too bad 'Saw wasn't
there to see it, definitely wet pants material! The best singing
of the night tho' went to Dickstah and the SO, signing thier rendition
of famous sitcom jingles! They actually got a few people in the
row in front of them to join in, and were taking requests! 8^)
Steve
|
29.689 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:22 | 11 |
| But see, unless Walt, Hawk, Mike or I were there, no DD impression
could be even close.
Not that Kev couldn't do it (in fact, has anyone ever seen Kev and
the DD together?????)
but, well, there's only ONE DD......
8^)
'Saw
|
29.690 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:29 | 10 |
| re Doc's random stuff in .681:
I heard/read that the Cards are going to resign Ozzie for '92. Given
that he's one of few veterans around what's basically a young
rebuilding team, probably not a bad a idea.
NO WAY would the Yankees deal Roberto Kelly to Boston.
py
|
29.691 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Beth Howland? | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:32 | 13 |
| I was there 'Saw... it wasn't bad considering they didn't see the
original. Kevin had:
1) A lot more teeth
2) No number 1 hand
3) Too much of a likeness to Allison Yankowskas (ha ha)...
4) Nobody down the row in dockers, sipping wine and eating from a
yuppie tablecloth...
Although he did babble on and on the whole night... and occasionally
had the look of befuddlement like when the guys behind you left.
Definitely needed work. Ways to go before Kwak calls him a geek(ha ha)...
|
29.692 | Walt was there, I'm SURE he'll come to my defense! ? | CST17::FARLEY | The Man with 1,000 ID's | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:45 | 31 |
| Oh yeah, I knew there was something I forgot to mention,
I was also directing my [alleged] comments at the umpires too!
Like I said before, I'm innocent of all charges and I'm feeling
like a victim of circumstantial illogical conclusions! In fact,
I belive Mac is one of the most even handed, fair and impartial,
un-opinionated moderators ever to walk the planet!!!!!! ;^)
Besides, hearing someone who MAY sound like me is inconclusive
proof that *I* actually said what ya'all said I said to a specific
individual and I'm truely hurt at this attempt to slander my name
and tarnish my reputation as a mild mannered, well behaved, quiet
kind o' guy!!!!!
(based on the way y'all are jumping on the vigilante bandwagon, anybody
know if a certain wheelchair bound attorney is available????)
Who_is_this_guy_called_Kev_anyhow???????
;^>
|
29.693 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:49 | 1 |
| Kevin Farley....the MrT of Tigermania!
|
29.694 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doc Flutie? | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:49 | 4 |
| Hey Kev you seen my license? Taking up on Saw's theme I think
the best solar panel on the team belongs to (Door)Matt Young.
/Don
|
29.695 | Harmless | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Curly Q. Link | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:59 | 9 |
| �< Note 29.693 by CAM::WAY "Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good" >
�Kevin Farley....the MrT of Tigermania!
Not to worry Kev, it's all a "harmless college prank"
Mr. Chap
|
29.696 | | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:32 | 9 |
| Look at it THIS way fans:
It's only 143 days until the start of Spring Training,
the point at which the Red Sox will no longer be
mathematically eliminated any more.....
'Saw
|
29.697 | Hey, I cain't find me license, You got it Kev? | CTHQ2::LEARY | | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:43 | 25 |
| Flintstones, we're the Flintstones
and
Car 54 where are you!
The Addams Family
A Horse is a Horse
Let me tell ya a story 'bout a main named Jed.
Yep, Dickstah and the SO had 'em rolling. Loved his Three Stooges
suspendahs.
Hey Kev, The accusation stands! We also know you directed your
"fascist" comments to the Haid-Crackin' Militia but under yo' breath
we hoid you mutter " You too, Mac"
Here's an "Eeeee, Eeeeee" to you! 8^)
Thank you Monsieur Diggins for your corroboration.
OK, Glenn amd Bob, recite back the '84 Tigers champeenship starting
lineup!! 8^)
MikeL
|
29.698 | Not that it'll ever happen but ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:47 | 24 |
| When will the Sox ever learn ??? If they would just *TRY* to build a
team with superb up-the-middle defensive skills, they might just do it.
They need a great defensive catcher, an Ozzie Smith clone at shortstop, a
superb second baseman and a quicksilver center fielder who'll flag down
just about everything in between both foul lines. Then add a couple more
fireballers and a junkballer or two and let the other team beat ground
balls up the middle all day long.
2-1 wins count just the same as 8-7 wins. They don't need Mike
Greenwell, Jack Clark, or Tom Brunansky. They need guys like Sandy
Alomar, Walt Weiss, Billy Ripken, and Devon White or suitable equivalents.
Keep Phil Plantier. He's a hard-nosed scrapper. Mo Vaughn has Sam Horn
written all over him although he looks a little better in the clutch than
Horn. Wade Boggs I could care less about. Yeah, sure, he hits .330 but
he still spells the word "team" with all "I"'s. Send him packing and
pick up or develop a Terry Pendleton clone.
The Sox need to clean the house from top to bottom and start over with
defense. Kiss contention good-bye for a few years and build, build,
build. All the way up from the very bottom.
Bob Hunt
|
29.699 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:39 | 29 |
| � They need a great defensive catcher, an Ozzie Smith clone at shortstop, a
� superb second baseman and a quicksilver center fielder who'll flag down
� just about everything in between both foul lines.
Pe�a's lack of offense hurt the Sox more than his slipping defensive
skills (the slip seems to be in throwing out baserunners, not blocking
balls or handling pitchers), Luis Rivera was not the Sox biggest
problem, and Ellis Burks does nicely in CF range wise thank you (we
just got to get him to learn to hit the cutoff man more often).
�They need guys like Sandy Alomar, Walt Weiss, Billy Ripken, and Devon
�White or suitable equivalents.
The teams with these guys finished as well or worse as the Sox did.
�Mo Vaughn has Sam Horn written all over him although he looks a little
�better in the clutch than Horn.
Except that Mo can sling the leather better than Horn ever could. He
should look better in the clutch than Horn with better than 30 RBIs in
only 200+ ABs and only 4 HR.
�Wade Boggs I could care less about. Yeah, sure, he hits .330 but
� he still spells the word "team" with all "I"'s. Send him packing and
� pick up or develop a Terry Pendleton clone.
And in a sport as dependent upon individual talent as baseball it would
be hard to replace the number of base runners and runs scored that Wade
Boggs represents. He's also no slouch in the field.
|
29.700 | What's wrong with Jody Reed at Second? | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:42 | 1 |
|
|
29.701 | I'd gladly make a Billy Ripken for Reed trade :-) | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:48 | 11 |
| re .700:
Beat me to it John. As one who's not a Sox fan, but sees a lot of them
because they're the local team, I think Reed has made great progress
defensively the last couple years. In particular, he seems to have 50%
more range this year than in the past. I'd stop short of putting him
on the same plane as a Sandberg or a Chico Lind, but have no qualms
about ranking him on the next level just below.
py
|
29.702 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:54 | 20 |
| Hey, I have no real passionate interest in the Red Sox. Just
opinions ...
Reed, Rivera, Burks, et al might be just the players the Sox need to
play good up-the-middle ball. But I believe the Sox need to stop
worshipping Dr Long Ball and start playing "little ball" which calls
for speed, leather, and brains.
On offense, keep pushing relentlessly for the next base with steals,
hit-and-runs, singles, sacs, and so on ... and, on defense, smother
absolutely everything up the middle.
They've let their home park dictate their lineup for far too long
now. A 3-2 win in Fenway counts the same as a 10-9 win, too.
And I know what kinda numbers Boggs puts up. Yeah, they'd be hard,
if not impossible, to replace. But the Sox need a team player and
Boggs is anything but.
Bob Hunt
|
29.703 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:14 | 37 |
|
> On offense, keep pushing relentlessly for the next base with steals,
> hit-and-runs, singles, sacs, and so on ... and, on defense, smother
> absolutely everything up the middle.
Why doesn't everyone do this, Bob? Sure, it's one formula for success,
but it's easier said than done to find the players who can do all these
things and execute them well...
One thing that would be foolish for the Sox to do would be to obtain
players who can't take any advantage of The Wall. I'm not talking
about the guys who are "guaranteed" to hit 50 homers and then come in
and have trouble hitting 20, or who, like Jack Clark, will hit 25 homers
but only 15 doubles. I'm talking about all kinds of hitters, including
lefthanders, who can pepper the thing, hit some homers, and run up what
should be the near-automatic 40 doubles. Boggs is the best at this;
it can't be denied, but it would be ideal if he had a little more speed
to use once he's gotten to second. Still, it doesn't make much sense
to concentrate on hitting balls up the middle when you've got That
Thing out there to give you easy check-swing doubles (Carlos Quintana
and Mo Vaughn should take note of this; Phil Plantier already has).
There's also nothing that precludes having an excellent pitching
staff complemented by a power offense or a speed-based offense (there
may be some small trade-offs on defense). Unfortunately, while the Sox
have developed some decent pitching talent in the last 10-15 years,
they've been pretty efficient at getting rid of it before it had a
chance to infect the team with the dreaded disease of "success".
There are no magic formulas. Overall incompetence by Sox management,
in a lot of areas, have hurt them more than any supposed wedding to a
particular philosophy.
glenn
|
29.704 | Not so bad... | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Reggie Dupard? | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:22 | 1 |
| Doesn't Sam Horn have 23 or so HR's?
|
29.705 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 03 1991 15:04 | 9 |
| � Doesn't Sam Horn have 23 or so HR's?
Yeah. As of a couple of weeks ago, he had the third highest HR/AB
ratio in the AL behind only Canseco and Fielder. He is also being used
as a platoon DH in Baltimore.
As far as selfish ball players go, we aren't talking football here,
folks. And FWIW, Wade had his share of game winning hits this season,
was seen pulling the ball, and swinging at 3-1 pitches.
|
29.706 | | WMOIS::COOK_T | SkysurfinonmyBoogieBoard | Thu Oct 03 1991 20:16 | 8 |
| Re .687
Kev, you forgot one thang! In order to be slandered, you have to start
with a good name! 8^)
Conan
|
29.708 | I got a scoop!!!!!!1111 | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Tue Oct 08 1991 15:15 | 8 |
| STOP THE PRESSES, STOP THE PRESSES!
Just got a call from someone who is home today...
The Sox just fired Joe Morgan and replaced him with Butch Hobson.
=Bob=
|
29.709 | It's true ... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | so what do *I* know, signed MrT | Tue Oct 08 1991 16:51 | 24 |
| Approved: [email protected]
BOSTON (UPI) -- Joe Morgan, whose Boston Red Sox collapsed in a
September pennant drive, Tuesday was fired as manager of the club in a
surprise move and replaced by Butch Hobson.
The Red Sox announced the dismissal at a news conference, two days
after the club completed the season tied for second place, seven games
behind Toronto in the American League East. The Red Sox lost 11 of their
last 14 games after pulling within a half game of the Blue Jays.
Morgan, part of the Red Sox organization since 1974, had shown no
indication the Red Sox were unhappy with his leadership. Last week he
was asked last week how long he wanted to keep managing.
``Another hundred years,'' he replied.
Hobson, a former Red Sox third baseman, managed Boston's Pawtucket
farm team this season to a division championship in the International
League. He received a two-year contract.
Morgan, 60, of Walpole, Mass., managed the Red Sox for 3 1/2 seasons,
leading Boston to two division titles. He was UPI's Manager of the Year
in 1988 when the Red Sox set an AL record by winning 24 straight home
games. The Red Sox won 12 straight after he became manager in July of
that season.
Morgan's dismissal comes one day after the New York Yankees removed
Manager Stump Merrill. Of the 26 major-league managers that began the
season, 10 have since been fired, including four in the AL East.
|
29.710 | Good interview on 4. | CRBOSS::DERRY | WasUpAboveIt...NowI'mDownInIt... | Wed Oct 09 1991 08:32 | 8 |
| I was like "What?" when I heard this yesterday. So, who wants
to tell me why he was fired? Maybe he couldn't control his day
care center and some of his actions were questionable but why
say the guy was doing an "excellent" job after you've pulled the
rug out from under him...
Are the 30+ yr old guys making mega $$ really going to "listen" to
Hobson? I hope so and wish him luck.
|
29.711 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 09 1991 08:52 | 3 |
| Gorman says he was afraid he'd lose Hobson to another team. Yeah,
right Lou.
Denny
|
29.712 | | CAM::WAY | With Malice Toward None | Wed Oct 09 1991 09:08 | 15 |
| I heard that Morgan said a couple of days ago:
I'm pleased with second place. We had a good season
and second place is a good accomplishment.
If that's true, and I was Gorman, and I'd heard him say it, I'd have
canned him on the spot.
Also, his decisions down the stretch were highly questionable....
Glad he's gone. Not that it will help, but I'm glad he's gone....
'Saw
|
29.713 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Oct 09 1991 09:50 | 6 |
| The timing stinks in 1 sense - he's 40 days of major league service
short of 10 years and a full pension. He only wanted to manage next
year anyway and then he would have qualified. I hope someone will pick
him up for long enough so he will qualify.
John
|
29.714 | Weep not for Granpa Joe..... | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:34 | 30 |
|
RE: Pension eligibility
Does the fact that he's been appointed to a scouting position
(at a mere $375K/year) have any bearing on his pension?
Hey, I kind of liked the ol' codger but lets face it, when it really
mattered, he blew it big time and went with his hunches instead of
his intellect/experience.
Karen, loved your reference to "kindergarden"! Great!!!
What was management to do? Suspend him for a couple of weeks because
he was screwing up too much and hope that he'd learn? Either keep him
(with probably the same result) or remove him from the position. The
latter btw, is NOT IMO a firing. Joe's been transferred to another
position. Firing=severence. Joe's gonna make $375,000 nexted year.
I should be so unfortunate.
Kev
|
29.715 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Wed Oct 09 1991 11:50 | 10 |
| re .711:
> Gorman says he was afraid he'd lose Hobson to another team. Yeah,
> right Lou.
Hobson's name was mentioned as a possibility (albeit remote) for the
vacant Yankee manager job.
py
|
29.716 | ;-) | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | None But The Brave | Wed Oct 09 1991 11:53 | 5 |
| One thing about Hobson, you know that if he argues with the ump and
kicks dirt, that the dirt will fly over the Umps feet and hit the bat
boy...
JD
|
29.717 | FWI & FWIW Hobson is a ripe ol' 40 years old | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:10 | 1 |
|
|
29.718 | | CAM::WAY | With Malice Toward None | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:12 | 11 |
| Yeah, but Kev, it's like this:
Hobson looks young and fast, like the new Red Sox wannabe
Morgan looked 100, and like his IQ was even less, and looked
like Rich Gedman *and* the Chainsaw could beat him in a race.
Like the new RedSox don't wannabe....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.719 | Sure, Lou, what REALLY happened? | GLITTR::HILL | | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:19 | 14 |
| re .711
I heard that too on channel 5:
Lou: "Well,WeWantedToMakeSureHeDidn'tGetSnappedUpByAnotherTeam.TheBest
WayToDoThatIsToGetHimToTheMajorsAsSoonAsPossible."
[Quick cut to Hobson]
Q: "Have you been approached by other teams?"
A: "No."
Seems like they caught Ol' Turkey Neck in a little disingenuousness...
Tom
|
29.720 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:21 | 5 |
| � Hobson looks young and fast, like the new Red Sox wannabe
Manging in the minors (Pawtucket & New Britain) turned this guy
completely grey. He'll have bleeding ulcers and a stroke managing in
Boston.
|
29.721 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:27 | 17 |
| Paul hit the nail on the head, the Sox were afraid Hobson would go
to the Yankmees and make them winners leaving them holding the bag (Morgan)
and trying to explain why they let boy wonder go but kept the Rain Man.
Just about every writer is moaning the firing (of course the fact that he
charmed the press and his stupid quotes were always good copy is probably
not the reason), but the Sox never won 90 games under Morgan. And it's
possible that after what the 'Can said about him, the Slobs could never entice
a black or latin free agent to Boston (of course this is assuming they want
to).
As far as Hobson goes I'll say now that the first two guys he butts
heads with are Boggs and Greenwell and whether or not the club stands
behind him will go a long way in determining how long Butch will stay.
Hobson wants to win, but trying to find 9 guys on the Sox who want the same
thing (re: World Championsip) is damn near impossible.
/Don
|
29.722 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:28 | 6 |
| I don't believe that a team could've just called up Hobson but
would've had to contact the Slobs first and get permission. So it's
possible that if someone wanted to talk to him he didn't know about
it.
/Don
|
29.723 | Ground ball to Hobbie.Duck! up the line | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:54 | 10 |
| Clell Laverne was goin gray when he played with the Yanks. He looked
like some ol' codger on the prowl on the Love Boat with his styled
gray hair, open collar, and chains. Where's John Travolta! ( Hey, you
got a IOU, budabing!)
Good one JD. My memories of Clell are of him at third base re-adjusting
his floating bone chips in his right elbow B4 the inning began. Ouch!
MikeL
|
29.724 | room temperature IQ (tm) | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:07 | 1 |
| > Morgan looked 100, and like his IQ was even less, and looked
|
29.725 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | Hey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya? | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:21 | 6 |
|
my recollection of Butch is that heseemed to be a few cards short of a full
deck.....
I got to wonder if he'll be able to manage with his brain. I sure he'll be
able to motivate but I think we'll see another hunch player...
|
29.726 | Hebner's toast too... | SALEM::DODA | Bill Buckner for Sox Batting Coach | Wed Oct 09 1991 13:44 | 1 |
|
|
29.727 | I think he should dump the nickname "Butch", though... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 09 1991 14:08 | 19 |
|
> Clell Laverne was goin gray when he played with the Yanks. He looked
> like some ol' codger on the prowl on the Love Boat with his styled
> gray hair, open collar, and chains. Where's John Travolta! ( Hey, you
> got a IOU, budabing!)
You caught that too, huh, Mike? My only thought was that maybe he's
caught in a time warp and still thinks he's in the glory season of
1978!
Geez, you would have thought one of those old bluebloods in the Sox'
front office would have told him to button his shirt, much less put on
a tie...
(By the way, I support this move entirely. Continued disrespect from
the players + bonehaid field managing = gone...)
glenn
|
29.728 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Clarence T, were you down wit OPP ? | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:14 | 12 |
| Slasher, I think the first player Hobson is going to go to war with is
Jack Clark.
Like i told allof you lasted winter, Clark is divisive and ovverrated.
Of course Gorman shipped out Lee Smith because he was a problem - how
many saves did he get anyway ?
Doc
p.s. Was Hobson wearing lipstick during his first interview ?
Funny-looking guy that Hobson ....
|
29.729 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:24 | 7 |
| The problem with Lee Smith was Bonehaid Morgan, but it's to
late to undo the damage he did. I disagree Doc about Clark. He can
go 0-5, but if the team wins he'll be happy. There are others on
this team who aren't like that and they'll be the ones to draw Hobson's
wrath.
/Don
|
29.730 | THE MAN HAD NO CLUE!!! | WMOIS::FASSETT_E | | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:37 | 8 |
| re:725
" My recollection of Butch is that heseemed to be a few cards short of
a full deck....."
If you were to rate Joe Morgan the same way, the only cards of a deck
that he had was the 2 JOKERS!!!!!!!!
|
29.731 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:54 | 4 |
| � Like i told allof you lasted winter, Clark is divisive and ovverrated.
Overrated? He did exactly what most people expected him to do. I
don't see how this can be considered overrated.
|
29.732 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | Hey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya? | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:54 | 4 |
|
Who Slasher, Who??? Spill the beans.....
mike
|
29.733 | not overrated, too predictable | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:57 | 7 |
| Yes Mac, but he was virtually non-existent from April through June.
Is he being paid to produce for 1/2 the year? Think of where the
Sox might have been if he did anything the first half. And yes, I'm
aware of his history.
MikeL
|
29.734 | Jack Clark - Brownnose | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Thu Oct 10 1991 14:45 | 10 |
| Clark was what he always was: a streaky slugger, who made as many big outs
as he did big hits. I think the guy is worth keeping around. He's no William
Bedford (rocket scientist) but he can add somehting when hot.
As far as feuding with Hobson is concerned, however, I wouldn't think so. Clark
bad mouthed Morgan in the paper the past couple of days, saying that the team's
attitude was to win in spite of Joe. To me that sounds liek he is lining up his
brownie points with management, and gettign ready to suck up to Hobson.
=Bob=
|
29.735 | Clark pulled his weight, in general | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 10 1991 15:58 | 20 |
|
Clark is far from overrated. He's not great, but he's actually better
than most fans give him credit for. Most see him as an all-or-nothing
home run or strikeout guy, but beyond that he is pretty patient at the
plate, only swings at his pitches or takes the walk. If you've got
someone to pick up from there (which the Sox didn't until Plantier came
up and Brunansky was benched), that's a pretty good strategy. The
injuries don't help, though, and they're inevitable with Clark.
It must also be noted that this season the San Diego Padres, without
Clark's bat and his supposed disruptive presence on the heels of his
fallout with the Wade Boggs of the NL, Tony Gwynn, suffered on
offense this season as their run scoring dropped significantly (to
ninth in the league). Fact is, in the time he was there, Clark was
one of the keys to keeping that offense barely afloat (it still wasn't
great). Overrated? Hardly. There's more than a few Sox in line ahead
of him for that honor...
glenn
|
29.736 | Can I name them Glen??? ;^) | AGNT99::CHILDS | Hey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya? | Thu Oct 10 1991 17:15 | 0 |
29.737 | Have at it, Mike... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 10 1991 17:24 | 1 |
|
|
29.738 | my cut at...who's next | AGNT99::CHILDS | Hey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya? | Thu Oct 10 1991 17:28 | 9 |
|
Let's see I'd start with Wade, then I think Bruno, followed by in no
particular order Greenwall, Burks and Vaughn.
Pena's iffy and Roger most definately makes the list because all though he
is a most excellent pitcher he's not GAWD. He stinks in the clutch....
mike
|
29.739 | A few more | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Thu Oct 10 1991 17:42 | 8 |
| How's this:
Jody Reed - good second baseman, but not untouchable.
Jeff Readon - Doesn't strike fear in the hearts of opponents like Sox fans
think.
Bill Fisher - Some Sox fans think the guy actually KNOWS something. I'm glad
he's gone.
=Bob=
|
29.740 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Oct 11 1991 00:50 | 12 |
| Clark's probably the last guy I'd worry about being at odds with Hobson. Say
what you might, Clark is a competitor and a team player. Yeah, he says some
things that are kind of ridiculous. He's no politician. But he's a team
player and plays hard to win and takes it hard when the team loses.
The guys to watch are Mike Greenwell (he might never make it to spring
training), Matt Young (kiss him good bye), and maybe Tom Brunansky, although I
think Bruno will take well to Hobson's style.
But only time will tell.
j.
|
29.741 | AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA� | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Fri Oct 11 1991 08:34 | 1 |
|
|
29.742 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:42 | 18 |
| Don't look now, but my morning paper says
the Gerbil's back....
Gonna be in the box on the 3rd baseline.
Also, heard that Allenson came up and will be the Bullpen coach.
Meantime, Morgan still doesn't have a clue as to why he was fired. Somehow
I get the impression that Morgan doesn't have much of a clue about
anything.....
'Saw
|
29.743 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:53 | 29 |
| I was listening to Eddie Anvilhaid coming home from work and he
gave his reasons why the Sox brought the gerbil back to Boston. Now while
he didn't frame them in a trendy, yuppie, David Lettermanish "Top Ten
Reasons" format, since I was wearing Dockers� yesterday I decided to do it
for him.
10. Sox thinking of buying WEEI and want to insure the phone lines
will be busy.
9. Didn't want to throw away the 17 spitoons that Joe Morgan left
behind.
8. Sy Sperling needed another model for the "before" pictures.
7. Red Sox needed poster boy for new "Help the Homeless" campaign.
6. North End bookies gave Lou Gorman a substantial kickback.
5. State of Massachusetts gets 7% of Zimmer's winnings at
Wonderland.
4. Wonderland management gave Lou Gorman a substantial kickback.
3. Sox need someone to teach younger players how *not* to dress.
2. Bill Lee turned down the job.
1. Financially strapped NESN cannot afford a second sattelite, so
will beam transmission off Don's haid.
|
29.744 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:16 | 6 |
| Rick Burleson has been named the batting coach. Anyone would be an
improvement over Hebner. Allenson is going to be the bullpen coach?
Wasn't he managing in New Britain last year? I thought they'd move him
up to Pawtucket. They had a pretty well respected man in the bullpen
already that they picked up from the Toronto organization. I think his
name is McLaren. Anyone named to replace Fisher yet?
|
29.745 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:26 | 16 |
| Position Former Staff New Staff
1st Base Al Bumbry Al Bumbry
3rd Base Dick Berardino Don Zimmer
Pitching Bill Fischer Rich Gale
Bullpen John McLaren Gary Allenson
Hitting Richie Hebner Rick Burleson
Gary Allenson was the manager at New Britain last year and apparently
had the option of either managing Pawtucket or being the bullpen coach
for the Red Sox. Also, I've heard that Roger Clemens is going to
management to protest the firing of Bill Fischer and I'm willing to bet
he'll memorialize him in some way in spring training nexted year like
he did with Jim Rice and Dwight Evans.
John
|
29.746 | Bullpen coach? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:35 | 10 |
|
Why would anyone want to be the bullpen coach in the bigs instead of
the manager at the AAA farm club (especially at Pawtucket, one of the
best minor league franchises in the country)? Seems like a dumb career
move for Gary Allenson. Bullpen coaches get to answer the phone, relay
messages, entertain the crazies and try to stay awake through the game,
all from one of the worst seats in the house.
glenn
|
29.747 | But Don Zimmer? | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:37 | 4 |
| I'm not surprised the Sox kept Bumbry, just frustrated that they continue to
resort to such tokenism.
=Bob=
|
29.748 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Clarence T, are you down wit OPP ? | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:02 | 23 |
| I think Clark is a better politicain than you give him credit for Jeff.
Moreover, he's had run-ins EVERYWHERE he's been ... in SF, SD, NY, now
Boston (St Louis was pretty peaceful on the field, it was with upper mgt
where he went to war).
re Glenn,
Gwynn = NL Boggs ? Ha. He steals bases, is a Gold Glove cailber RF
(after being a above-avg CF), and no one EVER questioned his work ethic
until Clark did. Not managers (past and present), players, peers,
opponents, or anyone else.
Fact is (here comes the snowstorm), if Clark was black, he'd be another
Lee Smith, Oil Can, [insert "bad influence"] and would have been
already packing his bags for another city.
And BoSox mgt. wonders why they can't get any decent black talent here.
The double-standard is rampant.
Speaking of which, what type of year did that notorious bad influence
Lee Smith have ? And will Joe Torre want him gone ?
Doc
|
29.749 | My assessment had *nothing* to do with race | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:18 | 30 |
|
> Gwynn = NL Boggs ? Ha. He steals bases, is a Gold Glove cailber RF
> (after being a above-avg CF), and no one EVER questioned his work ethic
> until Clark did. Not managers (past and present), players, peers,
> opponents, or anyone else.
Sure, Doc, all this might have been true before Gwynn got fat (which
*is* relevant to work ethic). Have you been paying any attention to
what's been going on with Gwynn the past couple years? Gwynn stole 8
bases this year, and was caught 8 times. Last year he stole a whopping
17. And in spite of his batting average (dominated by singles), his
OBP is a positively lackluster .355. Even Clark's was .374! (Boggs
was .421 this year.) I submit that at the current level of decline,
Gwynn is on the verge of becoming a liability, not an asset, unless he
comes back in better shape and turns things around.
> Fact is (here comes the snowstorm), if Clark was black, he'd be another
> Lee Smith, Oil Can, [insert "bad influence"] and would have been
> already packing his bags for another city.
Complete red herring, as I agree with you 100%. The Lee Smith thing
was one of the biggest travesties to unfold here in quite some time
(far worse than the Oil Can situation, even, the difference being that
Smith just counted his blessings to be gone, without complaint). This
has nothing to do with Jack Clark's attitude or his perception in
Boston, though. I'm going strictly by the numbers, and by the numbers
Jack Clark has not been "overrated".
glenn
|
29.750 | The more things change, the more.... | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:35 | 14 |
| Slasher, few back.
ESPN had better not try to beam anythang off Zip's haid, because with
that steel plate up there,they will relay Zim's darkest remembrances of
Funway. "Torrez deals. There's a high fly to left. Yastrzemski looks up
and it's in the net!" Viewers only hear a distant wail "Bucky 'Bleepin'
Dent, Bucky 'Bleepin' Dent"
BTW with old boy network in place for Clell Laverne, there's still
an opening for a sixth coach. Ya think da Stump might be gettin' a
call? There's enough spitoons 'round to accommodate him.
MikeL
|
29.751 | Talk about "appearance challenged". Zip fits that bill... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 11 1991 13:10 | 1 |
|
|
29.752 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Clarence T, are you down wit OPP ? | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:00 | 34 |
| re .749
First, I didn't mean to imply that your assessment of Clark is racially
based. I just wanted to bring up that point, since it hadn't been
touched.
As fo Gwynn, he has never been a particulary swevte man. His
Pillsbury/Don workout figure has always been the subject of a few
jokes. As for the declining SB total (believe me, I have him on two
rotis teams), a big chunk of it is due to him batting 3rd, instead of
leadoff in the batting order. He's asked to drive in more runs, and
he's done it. Another factor (this year) was the knee he injured in
July (he batted just .241 after the All-Star break), and continued to
play on despite the fact that his BA was dropping like a lead brick
(which gives lie to Clark's slander of Gwynn's "protecting" his BA).
Moreover, Gwynn has never been a guy to take a walk when he can get a
hit (which will be the reason why he won't hit .400), and that affects
the OBP. Finally, Gywnn has never had a lot of protection in the
batting order. Bip Roberts was the best leadoff man the Pads had for
Gywnn since the late Alan Wiggins, but he never got untracked this
year. You get a speedster in front of Gwynn, McGriff and another big
bat behind him, and Tony will hit .370 again.
Now tell me this - Why does Boggs get lambasted for not swinging enough
to be a run producer, yet Gwynn is nailed over his OBP ? What will make
these so-called pundits happy ?
Yes, Gywnn is not the player he was 4 years ago, but not nearly a
liability either, and he won't be for a while.
Regards,
Doc
|
29.753 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Clarence T, are you down wit OPP ? | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:07 | 23 |
| More on Jack The Wiffer :
Clark by the numbers had a decent season : .250, 28 HR's 89 RBI. .370
OBP.
The reality is that a large portion of those numbers came when the Sox
were DEEP in the hole, and looked dead. When it mattered early, and
late, he was a non-factor. When they were 11.5, 9 out, he was a terror.
Sorry Glenn, that doesn't hack it my book.
As for the human relations part, Clark will wind up being a seriously
divisive factor on this team, if he hasn't been already. At least
Greenwell wears it on his sleeve. Clark has more finesse. Do you really
think Clark waited until AFTER the Morgan canning to let his teammates
and management know how he felt ?
At some point next season, Hobson and Clark will have a few rounds at
each other - I hope I'm wrong, but I'd bet on it ...
Doc
|
29.754 | I'm sure he'll butt heads again-- doesn't bother me | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:22 | 25 |
|
Doc, my point is that all this stuff about being "divisive" and a "bad
influence" is mostly garbage, which is why I brought up the point that
getting him out of the San Diego clubhouse didn't help their team one
bit. The important thing is what you do on the field. You yourself
have long argued that such labels are often applied stereotypically and
capriciously, that they're unfair and dangerous, and I agree. I don't
see how it's any different with Clark. Everyone knows that Clark
shoots off his mouth, and I disagree that he does so tactfully or
cleverly. Even Morgan (who has shown an amazing amount of class over
his firing) brushed off Clark's comments as just part of his
schizophrenic up-and-down behavior.
As for Clark's performance, beyond the raw stats I read somewhere that
a very high percentage of his 28 homers came in close game situations
with the game on the line. Sure, he was terrible in the beginning of
the season (as always), but you can't brush off what he did as purely
garbage-time production, not considering that the Sox pulled to within
a half game with Clark as a big reason for it (but with Plantier as the
major force). Hey, I've admitted that he's not great, just that he did
what was expected. There were too many other shortcomings and holes to
fill, but Clark wasn't one of them.
glenn
|
29.755 | | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:42 | 7 |
| � First, I didn't mean to imply that your assessment of Clark is racially
� based. I just wanted to bring up that point, since it hadn't been
� touched.
Well, not in the last 10 minutes anyway. I realize you had to throw
something in since you're favorite college QBs haven't been in the news
(or the NFL) lately.
|
29.756 | Slowest HR trot on record | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 11 1991 15:07 | 8 |
| � The reality is that a large portion of those numbers came when the Sox
� were DEEP in the hole, and looked dead.
Doc, thanks for pointing out that Clark was a big factor in helping the
Sox climb out of that hole. The slump that followed was largely due to
the muscle pull he suffered from carrying the rest of the team on his
shoulders (not quite true, Grenwell, Boggs, Reed, and Hesketh played a
big part as well).
|
29.757 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Kids are our Future-Teach 'em Well | Fri Oct 11 1991 16:33 | 7 |
|
Clemens ought to sit down and shut his mouth until he's got enough of
Jean Yawkey's money to buy her out. He was the lead guy in the "Gang of
10" that got Morgan fired. Joe Morgan wasn't my favorite Red Sox
Manager but Gorman was the one who should have gone.
|
29.758 | Now that Mao's widow is dead... | SPARKL::HILL | | Fri Oct 11 1991 16:39 | 6 |
| re last
Huh? Could you elaborate on this? I didn't get a paper today, but did
Clemens come up with one of his gems? Who are the "Gang of 10"? Seems
that a lot of the players might not have cared for Tollway Joe.
Tom
|
29.759 | You played yourself there Mac ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Clarence T, are you down wit OPP ? | Fri Oct 11 1991 19:14 | 7 |
| re .755
Rodney Peete - Mac, what is that stiff doing in Detroit anyway ?
heh heh heh
Doc
|
29.760 | | DECWET::METZGER | Gojiro, defender of the Evoloo | Fri Oct 11 1991 19:24 | 14 |
| > re .755
>
> Rodney Peete - Mac, what is that stiff doing in Detroit anyway ?
>
> heh heh heh
>
> Doc
Don't you mean Andre Ware, Doc? Or was that Major Harris ? You've had so many
favorites I forget...
Metz
|
29.761 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Any knucklehead can score | Mon Nov 11 1991 09:22 | 5 |
| SportsChannel will be showing Roger Clemens' 20-strikeout game tonight
at 9 PM Eastern Time (part of their "Baseball's Greatest Games" series).
py
|
29.762 | CLEMENS WIN CY YOUNG #3 | ESKIMO::GARRY | Go Irish | Wed Nov 13 1991 19:20 | 11 |
| This notes for Mike Childs,Kevin West and Paul(swindell)Gronowski,your
least favorite hurler has won his 3RD CY YOUNG award by a landslide.
Rocket Roger Clemens has once again proved he is the best in the game
today bar none.Say what you want but he is the most consistent man
out there and every team would love to have a pitcher with half his
credentials,he is only 29 so he still may win another 2 or 3.
It only goes to show that the voters don't only look at "wins" they
look at overall stats and he is the best at his position for the
year 1991.
Tom
|
29.763 | step up Joe H. | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Thu Nov 14 1991 12:49 | 7 |
|
Pure BS Tom. I swear he must have split his bonus with the writers. He wins
the thing on two good months. The rest of time it was JACKCITY BABEE!!!
and the biggest game of the year where was the dominating stuff?
heck he wasn't even the most valuable pitcher on his own team....
|
29.764 | | CAM::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Thu Nov 14 1991 12:56 | 1 |
| Mike, please tell us how you REALLY feel ;^)
|
29.765 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Nov 14 1991 13:00 | 10 |
| It's not worth getting an ulcer over. Remember, these are opinions and
they are like a**holes - everyone has one.
My own viewpoint - whether or not he "deserved" it (and until the
standards are a bit more quantified, deserved is a bit nebulous), it's
nice to see as a Red Sox fan but it doesn't take the place of a World
Series win. I'd trade every individual honor received by Sox players
in my lifetime in return for a couple of World Series wins.
John
|
29.766 | | FDCV07::KING | Be nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!! | Thu Nov 14 1991 13:25 | 7 |
| John, you forgot the whole saying.....
Opinions are like a$$holes... Just some are bigger than others...
REK
:-}
|
29.767 | | CAM::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Thu Nov 14 1991 13:47 | 4 |
| > Opinions are like a$$holes... Just some are bigger than others...
Yeah, but a$$holes are useful and have a purpose. Some people's
opinions aren't 8^)
|
29.768 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Thu Nov 14 1991 14:00 | 4 |
|
You forgot something else: ...and they all stink.
Claybroon
|
29.769 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | BabyBlueDockers�-PantsFor|CENSORED|s | Thu Nov 14 1991 15:39 | 4 |
| Come on now Mike. If you keep acting like this you ain't getting
that autographed picture of Roger and Wade I promised you.
/Don
|
29.770 | ROGER CLEMENS IS GOD - A great individual contributor... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 14 1991 15:50 | 13 |
|
re: .762
That's what the Sox need... a bunch of individual contributors who
win individual awards and CHOKE when it comes down to crunch time.
BTW, winning the AL Cy Young does not make Roger Clemens the
"best in the game bar none".
One more thought for you to ponder Mr Garry... its been 73 years
since the last Sox WS title... and we're still counting. I'm sure
Scott Erickson is sitting at home saying "Geez, I sure wish I could
trade this WS ring in for one of those Cy Young Awards..."
|
29.771 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 14 1991 15:51 | 4 |
|
Has Roger Clemens ever won a World Series game? Seriously, because
I don't know.
|
29.772 | | MEIS::SIKES | | Thu Nov 14 1991 16:16 | 28 |
| Re:.770
> That's what the Sox need... a bunch of individual contributors who
> win individual awards and CHOKE when it comes down to crunch time.
How dare Clemens give up 2.62 earned runs a game, and pitch an average
of 7.8 innings per start, why didn't he do something for the team?!?
> BTW, winning the AL Cy Young does not make Roger Clemens the
> "best in the game bar none".
Right, it just makes him the best pitcher in the AL for the 1991
regular season.
> One more thought for you to ponder Mr Garry... its been 73 years
> since the last Sox WS title... and we're still counting. I'm sure
> Scott Erickson is sitting at home saying "Geez, I sure wish I could
> trade this WS ring in for one of those Cy Young Awards..."
Probably more like "Geez, if Clemens hadn't pitched so well, I would've
won the Cy Young..."
I still don't understand how much more a pitcher can do for his team than
hold the other team to as few runs as possible, while lasting as far into
the game as possible?
Bob
|
29.773 | | CSOA1::BACH | THE Chicago Bear Fan | Thu Nov 14 1991 16:16 | 5 |
| RE: .770 (Groanowski)
Try being a Cub_Fan...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
29.774 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Nov 14 1991 16:23 | 16 |
| Roger Clemens winning the Cy Young award doesn't make him a bad person
or a selfish pitcher. It may or may not over inflate his achievements.
I'm glad he's on the Red Sox and I hope he stays here for the length of
his career. His work ethic is second-to-none, I believe he's maturing
as a person and I hope the good parts of his personality and game would
rub off on his teammates.
I will not get into the merits of whether he deserved the award or not
because I don't believe in individual awards in team sports.
I still feel, though, that his individual achievement is worth far less
than it would be if it was done in the context of a World Series title
for the Sox. I am nowhere near as happy with all these individual
awards as I would be with just 1 measly World Series win.
John
|
29.775 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 14 1991 16:42 | 12 |
|
re: .773
I'm an Indians fan... that's right up there with being a Cubs
fan, but not quite as bad as being a Sox fan. See, with the Indians
and Cubs, there is always hope... the Sox have proven they will
Choke every time... its not even much fun to root against them
anymore (other than the financial gains to be had living in this
area - MA).
|
29.776 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Thu Nov 14 1991 17:12 | 11 |
|
>> How dare Clemens give up 2.62 earned runs a game, and pitch an average
>>of 7.8 innings per start, why didn't he do something for the team?!?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Does the designated $hitter get an assist on the Cy Young award.
Without the DH he only would've pitched about 5 or 6 inning per start,
on the average.
JaKe
|
29.777 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | OPP ? No ! Are you down wit HIV ? | Thu Nov 14 1991 18:12 | 10 |
| re JAke
The DH also means that his ERA is all the more impressive since he
isn't facing an automatic out 3 times a game (at least).
re Groaner
'there's always hope [for a Cleveland fan] ....'
Of what ? Finishing over .500 ?
|
29.778 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Aren't Reaganomics Wonderful! | Thu Nov 14 1991 19:25 | 9 |
| ALl I hope is that along with the Cy Young, they gave Roger a videotape
that included the pitching performance of Avery, Smolz, and Morris -
entitled "How to Pitch in Big Games" - and I hope Roger watches it
about a zillion times.
He's d great pitcher. No arguement. But personally, there are a lot
of pitchers I'd give the ball to before Roger come big game time.
JD
|
29.780 | Roger well deserving thised year. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Nov 15 1991 08:55 | 12 |
|
If Roger's mates could've held on to the lead more often, Clemens
could've easily won over 20 this year. Look it up, he left at least
4 games witha one or two run lead and the team lost. They had a
break down of his game by game perfomance in the Globe yesterday.
Say for about 4 lousy games he was in every other one. Pretty damn
good when you lead the league in starts, not to mention K's, shutouts,
and ERA.
Steve
|
29.781 | Can Bob Feller still pitch? | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Nov 15 1991 09:26 | 9 |
| New rallying cry for Cleveland
"Hope for the Indians in '92"
Let's complete the phrase
"Hope for the Indians in '92 to average 5,000 per game and git 60 wins"
HTH
MikeL
|
29.782 | Paul, U din't buy my CLE games this yr? Why? | SALEM::DODA | David Duke is a sheethead | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:12 | 11 |
| Re: .781
Ha!
When was the last time the Indians finished over .500? Hope?
Damn these Red Sox, every year they're in it till the end and I
have to keep watching them. If I were an Indian fan, I could
start looking forward to football( ha!) at the All-Star break.
daryll
|
29.783 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:18 | 9 |
|
Yeah Doc, but by the same token how many times would Roger have lasted 7 or
more innings without the DG? His ERA would have been alot worst cause when
he was getting tattooed it was early. In the NL he'd have been pulled early
for offense and hence a higher ERA....
In the NL where the high hard one is just another ball, he'd be in trouble..
mike
|
29.784 | Great pitching is great pitching... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:32 | 17 |
|
The DH versus having to come out early in the NL would be a wash
for Clemens. The bigger effect would be getting out of Fenway Park
and pitching in those more spacious parks in the National League.
Clemens would almost certainly be helped there, as on average all
NL pitchers are, much less pitchers moving from Fenway to the NL
(take a look at Bruce Hurst, Bob Ojeda, John Tudor's ERA numbers,
before and after).
Sure, Roger would have to make an adjustment to the strike zones
of a new set of umpires. While some NL umpires take away the high
strike, they also have the tendency in the NL to widen it as
compensation. Clemens has good control, and lives on the corners.
He'd do just fine, 'cause he's Roger... ;-)
glenn
|
29.785 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:44 | 6 |
| Since the inception of divisional play in baseball in the 1960s,
every team has finished ahead of every other team in it's division at
least once, except for 1 case. The Cleveland Indians have NEVER
finished ahead of the Boston Red Sox during that 20+ year stretch.
HTH
Denny
|
29.786 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | BabyBlueDockers�-PantsFor|CENSORED|s | Fri Nov 15 1991 10:48 | 4 |
| That tears it Childs, I'm sending the autographed Wade&Roger
picture to JD!
/Don
|
29.787 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 15 1991 11:06 | 8 |
|
re: .785
Denny, I hate the break the news to you... finishing about the Indians
over the past 20 years is no great accomplishment.
Since the Red Sox World Series title in 1918, the Red Sox HAVE NOT
won another... since that time, the Indians have.
|
29.788 | | ESKIMO::GARRY | Go Irish | Fri Nov 15 1991 14:04 | 8 |
| Mike C admit it a great pitcher is a great pitcher regardless of the
league he pitches in...if you are so sure Rocketman woould'nt do well
in the NL how come the NL's best don't hammer him in the allstar game
Clemens mows them down every time.
Sounds like sour grapes to me....and besides depite all your negative
notess about him how come you have a picture of him in your office?
Tom
|
29.789 | And if he was in the Japan league bla bla... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Nov 15 1991 14:05 | 7 |
|
As usual, Childs is grasping at straws. Why don't you just admit it Mike,
Clemens is the best pitcher in the Americam League for the '91 season.
It's not hard, come on you can say it...8^)
Steve
|
29.790 | | CRBOSS::DERRY | Here We Are Now...Entertain Us | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:13 | 5 |
| > Sounds like sour grapes to me....and besides depite all your negative
> notess about him how come you have a picture of him in your office?
Must be that nice autographed picture that I gave him. I knew he'd
treasure it.
|
29.791 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:23 | 6 |
|
I noticed alot of small (dart sized) holes in that picture last time
I was in Mike's office. That might be a clue as to what he's using
it for. Also, I didn't know that Roger had a beard - he does in
the picture that Mike has in his office.
|
29.792 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:45 | 14 |
|
>>If Roger's mates could've held on to the lead more often, Clemens
^^
^^
Yeah, that good old word "IF"
Ya know, IF your uncle had mammaries you'd call him "Aunt"
Schnort Schitt SChwanz
JaKe
|
29.793 | Goose? Gander? Bueller? | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:52 | 5 |
|
Just tryin' to make a point Rake. If Mike can speculate so cans I!
Steve
|
29.794 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Fri Nov 15 1991 16:05 | 8 |
| Steve,
Just busting your chops!!
Went back and noticed I forgot the smiley, meant there to be one.
JaKe
|
29.795 | no was G | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Sun Nov 17 1991 09:56 | 23 |
|
I still believe I ain't grasping at straws. Sure he put up some mavelous
stats but he started what 6-0 then we won like six more in the august time
fram so for other four months of the baseball season he was hardly dominating
goinging 6-10. He was repeatly bombarded early in games, games which he would
have been pulled in the NL but hung in would shut them down for 3 or 4 innings
With his wide strikezone of course he's going to get easier K's and more K's
lead to a lower ERA.
The point is he certain was in the top 3 but he blew that game when they
were 1 out it the last week of the year when yor ACE is absolutely postively
supposed to win (ie Viola, Hershier, Morris).
He was inconsistent durning the year as was Erickson but Abbott was pretty
steady with a little less spectacular figures. Given Clemens already owned
2 why not give it to someone else who had stats that were on par with his.
Also Erickson did get 20 whixh was supposed to be the magic number...
Glenn I agree he would be able to adjust to the NL league umps, but his
bread and butter has been the high hardone...
mike
|
29.796 | Well Fileder had 60 hmrs but he won lasted year so lets... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon Nov 18 1991 07:57 | 12 |
| He was repeatly bombarded early in games, games which he would
have been pulled in the NL
Mike this statement has no bearing, Clemens pithches in the AL.
Therefore I submit that you are grasping at least one straw! 8^)
Jake, don't you think I knew that? What makes you think I didn't
know that? I knew that? 8^)))
Steve
|
29.797 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 18 1991 09:50 | 4 |
| Mike, even when Clemens went into his "slump", his ERA was around 3 in
those games. He finished in the top 3 of just about every category
that a starting pitcher is measured by. You don't do that by going
south for a significant part of the season.
|
29.798 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | N.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptus | Mon Nov 18 1991 09:59 | 5 |
| I agree Mike, you're not grasping at straws...
You're grasping at air.
/Don
|
29.799 | It don't add up! | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:42 | 7 |
| I gotta agree with Mike one this one, the Cy Young Award should not be
based on statistics and facts.
It should be awarded based on the total sum of each players
intangibles.
lEe :*)
|
29.800 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | N.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptus | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:22 | 1 |
| That's what Don Zimmer will bring to this team. Intangerbils!
|
29.801 | Here's something for the Clemens bashers to muddle over | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 26 1991 11:04 | 21 |
| <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.528 Roger Clemens 528 of 532
MEIS::SIKES 14 lines 26-NOV-1991 08:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: .524
Clemens' career statistics through 1990.....
W - L ERA
Before All-Star break 65 - 30 3.11
After All-Star break 51 - 21 2.58
April 18 - 6 2.30
May 22 - 10 3.15
June 20 - 10 3.52
July 19 - 10 2.71
August 20 - 9 3.23
Sept/Oct 17 - 6 2.19
|
29.802 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:10 | 3 |
| Mac, did you send a copy directly to Mike?
LeE :*)
|
29.803 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:07 | 2 |
| I sure did LeE. Mike said he's going to take it to a card show that
Roger is appearing at and pay the $15 to have him autograph it.
|
29.804 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:18 | 4 |
|
that's if I can't get him to autograph my body....
;^)
|
29.805 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:27 | 1 |
| Mike, I think that will cost ya extra.
|
29.806 | vs Contenders...see there's still plenty to bash | CSCMA::FINIZIO | Hey Get a grep on it | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:20 | 4 |
|
How about a breakdown of CLemens stats in games that mean
something?
|
29.807 | | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:47 | 7 |
|
> -< vs Contenders...see there's still plenty to bash >-
Can someone please run the numbers minus the Yankee games?
glenn
|
29.808 | you get the idea... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:50 | 3 |
|
Has Roger Clemens ever beaten the Mets? Has Roger Clemens ever
beaten Super Contra for NES? Has Roger Clemens...
|
29.809 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:03 | 7 |
| Bob, when you can successfully define "Meaningful Game", I'm sure
someone can come up with the numbers.
Only the NL president will tell you that a game in September means more
than a game in April. And even if you do agree with the NL Prez,
Roger's stats shows he is consistent, if not better as the season gets
"more meaningful".
|
29.810 | | CELTIK::JACOB | R.I.P, Badger Bob | Tue Nov 26 1991 19:42 | 11 |
| >><<< Note 29.808 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>> -< you get the idea... >-
>>Has Roger Clemens ever beaten the Mets? Has Roger Clemens ever
>>beaten Super Contra for NES? Has Roger Clemens...
Has da Groaner ever put in a meaningful note in his lifetime??????
JaKe
|
29.811 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Wed Nov 27 1991 07:06 | 5 |
| Ha ha ha ha ha, you really got me rooooolllling on that one, Jake!
:*) :*)
lEe
|
29.812 | To much pressure for him | CSCMA::FINIZIO | Hey Get a grep on it | Wed Nov 27 1991 08:56 | 5 |
|
Actually if you run the stats minus the Yankees, Clemens era
should drop as the Yankees own Clemens....
|
29.813 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 27 1991 09:52 | 2 |
| BowlingPinMan (aka Jake), I entered a meaningful note once... which
is more than I can say about you.
|
29.814 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Charlie! He walka like 'dis.. | Fri Dec 13 1991 16:07 | 15 |
|
Rocket Roger was found not guilty on assault or whatever charges were
pressed against him as a result of his bar room brawl incident.
Since the event took place in Texas, he still has to face further
charges of "NOT having a gun without a good reason". I understand the
law is pretty strict about that in Texas. [isfh]
But all seriousness aside, how come this important trial was not
carried by the "Court Channel" and CNN?? I mean they spent all
that time covering the William K. Smith thang, and how many Cy Young's
has *he* ever won???
Dickstah
|
29.815 | No really, the farce is not over! | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 13 1991 16:47 | 23 |
|
Just another defeat in absentia for our dear departed friend, Dan
Schneider. When the facks came out, Roger was guilty of being
inebriated and putting a moonlighting cop/security guard, who had
just knocked Clem's brother to the floor, in a "bear hug" (as
described so damagingly by the prosecution's star witness). Dan
was trying to convince us that this "barroom brawl" was yet another
clear example of Roger's pattern of borderline psychotic behavior.
If anything Clemens was trying to prevent a fight and/or keep his
brother from getting his head kicked in!
Never ones to call it a day and save the taxpayers a few bucks,
though, the DA's office has filed new charges against Clemens on a
Class B misdemeanor (now down from a felony count of assaulting
a police officer and a Class A misdemeanor for hindering arrest--
the judge delivered a directed verdict on this second count as
Clemens' brother had already been arrested when the "assault"
occurred) for "interfering with a police officer". Gotta luv that
Texas judicial system, especially Houston's...
glenn
|
29.816 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 13 1991 16:52 | 4 |
| � Just another defeat in absentia for our dear departed friend, Dan
� Schneider.
Yeah, but Mike Childs is still around...
|
29.817 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Specializing in feather ruffling notes | Mon Dec 16 1991 10:37 | 5 |
|
yeah but it's basketball season Mac and I got time to deal with Clemens.
Besides I've been a 5 maybe 6 maybe a dozen bar brawls in mt life time
too so I know you never know who started what other than the Alchol was
to BLAM (TM)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
29.818 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | We *all* put the yeast in! | Fri Dec 20 1991 11:04 | 9 |
|
Sox finally orchestrate a deal.
Viola will play in Boston, if the Doctors determine he's in tune.
Parade in October!
Dickstah
|
29.819 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AKinderGentlerBigGame? | Fri Dec 20 1991 11:05 | 3 |
| Sox sign Viola!
Surgery is June!
|
29.820 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Fri Dec 20 1991 12:07 | 3 |
| Who's June?
And cain she pitch?
Denny
|
29.821 | Frankley, does it matter? | CST17::FARLEY | Dashing throught da Droods(tm) | Fri Dec 20 1991 12:21 | 1 |
|
|
29.822 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | THEY MUSTA SEEN ME AT THE Y! | Tue Dec 24 1991 10:42 | 5 |
| Will he be rated behind Clemens? If so, will he be playing second
fiddle, or second viola?
lEe
|
29.823 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Jan 17 1992 07:03 | 4 |
| Heard today that the Sox have signed Jim Rice as a roving hitting
instructor/coach.
Lee
|
29.824 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknight | Fri Jan 17 1992 07:29 | 2 |
| ...a move that guarantees the team will lead the league in double
plays into the next century.
|
29.825 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CrashCansecoStrikesAgain | Fri Feb 14 1992 13:02 | 1 |
| Why are the Slobs and Jody Reed going to arbitration over $100K?
|
29.826 | 'cus Jody is a cheesedick | SALEM::DODA | Send a Message: Laughlin for President | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:01 | 0 |
29.827 | | RUGBY1::way | Cheesed a big one off | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:50 | 17 |
| Darryl!
You can't say that in NOTES!
You have to use some other expression, something like:
He is a penicular appendage composed of dairy product material.
He is a cheese-weinie.
He is a cheese-Richard...
hope this helps,
'Saw
|
29.828 | 'cus Jody is a dairy-type appendage | SALEM::DODA | Send a Message: Laughlin for President | Tue Feb 18 1992 14:01 | 1 |
|
|
29.829 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCanseco | Tue Feb 18 1992 14:50 | 1 |
| Wade Boggs has been lifting weights! Parade in October!
|
29.830 | the fat lady doesn't count | FRETZ::HEISER | stop making sense! | Tue Feb 18 1992 14:55 | 1 |
| > Wade Boggs has been lifting weights! Parade in October!
|
29.831 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:00 | 4 |
| What can't you say? Cheese? Or Dick? One's going to piss off /Don and the
other will certainly aggravate Mr. Hamel.
j.
|
29.832 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheesed a big one off | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:10 | 11 |
| You can say "Cheese" and you can say "Dick", but you can't say the
both of them together without another word or three or seventeen in
between to separate them.
Unlike the two words pencil and neck, which you can put together, cheese
and dick don't fit together in a "family" style atmosphere here...
It's called politically correct (formerly kinder and gentler) vocabulary.
'Saw
|
29.833 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCanseco | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:14 | 1 |
| Whooda thunk Jody Reed would spark such controversy! 8^o
|
29.834 | politically correct is an oxymoron! | FRETZ::HEISER | stop making sense! | Tue Feb 18 1992 17:26 | 0 |
29.835 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Feb 19 1992 11:57 | 4 |
| Hmmm, my Dad had a oxymoron ring that he got from his father. Why is
that politically correct?
lEe :*)
|
29.836 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Fri Feb 21 1992 09:33 | 5 |
| Jean Yawkey had a stroke last night and is in serious condition at
MGH. TeeVee said that if she should pass on the partnership or
shareholders agreement says the team will be sold to the highest
bidder.
Denny
|
29.837 | his bid might be too high though | FRETZ::HEISER | stop making sense! | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:03 | 1 |
| Maybe that's what Hawk saved the ticket money for.
|
29.838 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | GHWB-Anywhere But America Tour 92 | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:10 | 10 |
|
Actually I'ld look to see a number of players should this occur. First
and foremost is Harrington. He's got the most to lose by losing
control. Next watch and see if Haywood Sullivan or Buddy Leroux begin
to accumulate money promises. I'ld also watch the local sports guys
like Paul Fireman of Reebok. Harrington, IMO, would be ok. Sullivan
and Leroux would be absolute disasters (they've lost their interest in
anything but making a buck). Fireman would probably be the best guy.
|
29.839 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| Gee, imagine if a consortium wanted to buy them and move them from
Fenway. Wouldn't that be something? Wonder what the reaction would be
by certain noters....
JD
|
29.840 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:20 | 8 |
| One of the major, major pieces of the team's worth is Fenway Park and
the land it sits on. Sooner or later, Fenway Park is going to have to
be replaced. I've often thought the Red Sox are very quietly
stockpiling land (like Disney did down in Florida) to build their
future home. I can never see the Red Sox going into a multipurpose
stadium that they don't own - they'll want to maintain control.
John
|
29.841 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:29 | 14 |
|
> Gee, imagine if a consortium wanted to buy them and move them from
> Fenway. Wouldn't that be something? Wonder what the reaction would be
> by certain noters....
I'd probably want the commissioner to get involved to protect the
interests of the fans, just as I've argued all along...
I don't think you're going to see Buddy LeRoux back with the Red Sox.
In the first place, he's no longer even a limited partner, right? In
the second place, he's got no money...
glenn
|
29.842 | good but futile..... | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:30 | 13 |
| I heard a Japanese group is going to submit a bit. If accepted, many
of the players and management are going to be fired or replaced.
Apparently this group is lead by a no nonsense Japanese businessman
named
Wyn Won Suun
ta boom
Kev
|
29.843 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:58 | 4 |
| I wonder if the comments from that ingrate, Jody Reed, had anything to
do with her having the stroke?
lEl
|
29.844 | That cheesedi, uh, dairy-type appendage! | SALEM::DODA | Reform DCU: Elect Petition Candidates | Fri Feb 21 1992 12:24 | 1 |
|
|
29.845 | Move to California by 4/20, please... | SASE::SZABO | | Fri Feb 21 1992 12:45 | 5 |
| Hey, if they move, I wouldn't have to find those damn tickets that I
ain't gonna find anyway...
Hawk
|
29.846 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Fri Feb 21 1992 15:24 | 9 |
|
Just imagine if I could afford to buy em....hahahahaaa
The thought of Roger washing my car and Boggs cutting my grass is too good
to be true.....
think Bill Murray would coach em' for me???
;^)e+10
|
29.847 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Feb 24 1992 08:05 | 5 |
| The 'Q' was in an auto accident in Venezuela. He has a broken foot
and a broken arm. Gil Santos said Q was on his way to the hospital with
his brother who had been SHOT, when he sideswiped a car and hit a
bridge. Musta been a tough weekend.
Denny
|
29.848 | | CAMONE::WAY | You'll be left with empty arms | Mon Feb 24 1992 08:10 | 17 |
| Article in yesterday's Courant (which I found out is the oldest paper in the
US), about the Sox.
It mentioned that Hobson is very different from Morgan, in that he's very
dynamic and expects everybody put out a bazillion percent. It said
that could cause problems with the old "wealthy" veterans.
It said that the team was pretty much the same as last year excepting
for the addition of Viola.....
The way I see it, the Sox finish second or third in a hunt that includes
Toronto and Detroit. Toronto wins the East....
'Saw
|
29.849 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | My father has only memory of it | Mon Feb 24 1992 08:12 | 13 |
| > It mentioned that Hobson is very different from Morgan, in that he's
> very dynamic and expects everybody put out a bazillion percent. It
> said that could cause problems with the old "wealthy" veterans.
Maybe that'll be the kick in the pants this team needs.
I'll agree with your prediction of Toronto finishing first IF they have
a healthy Dave Steib all season...Steib only started nine games last
year, a full productive season from him would mean as much to the Jays
as the addition of Viola will to the Sox.
py
|
29.850 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Mon Feb 24 1992 11:13 | 8 |
| I predict the Sox by 7 games over Toronto. They win the ALCS is five
games and the Series in six!!!!!!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.851 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Forgot to cut my imbecilical cord | Mon Feb 24 1992 11:30 | 6 |
|
Well, now it looks like Moe Vaughn gets the chance to play full time
and prove himself. Think you can walk the walk, Moe?
Dickstah
|
29.852 | I'm NOT making this up! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Feb 25 1992 12:00 | 7 |
| It was all over the nooze lasted night that The Rocket didn't show
up with the rest of the pitchers and catchers yesterday. Bob Lobel
tracked down the reason: He'll appear tomorrow for a charity bartending
gig at, get this,
The Velvet Elvis in Houston!
Must be onea Doc's old haunts eh?
Denny 8^)
|
29.853 | According to Tank... | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Feb 25 1992 12:46 | 7 |
| Supposedly, Roger has a clause in his contract that allows him to
arrive 1 week after pitcher/catcher camp opens. Supposedly, Butch was
on the horn to him last night. Supposedly, Roger will show before the
1 week is up...
Hawk
|
29.854 | | CAMONE::WAY | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Feb 25 1992 13:02 | 5 |
| Yes, I've heard the same thing, only I heard that he didn't have to
show up until 3/6.
'Saw
|
29.855 | It's in there... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Playdough,Homey,Vitale,BobKnight | Tue Feb 25 1992 13:10 | 5 |
|
ALL MLB players have it in their contract that they don't have to
show up for spring training until 3/6, not just Rog...
Phoe shit shlep
|
29.856 | It's a throw to 1st Babeeeeee!!!!! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Tue Feb 25 1992 16:58 | 12 |
|
another rumor has it that while Dick Macdunna (sp?) does stuff
for CBS, Channel 38 has spoken to (double gasp!)
Dick Vitale to do the Sox games!!!!
schlop srtep shcepl
Kev
|
29.857 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 25 1992 17:02 | 7 |
| � another rumor has it that while Dick Macdunna (sp?) does stuff
� for CBS,
For those of you without RCASO decoder rings, I think this means Sean
McDonough.
KTH (Kev Tried Hard) ;^)
|
29.858 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Where's Roger? | Wed Feb 26 1992 09:38 | 5 |
| The look on Hobson's face when asked about Roger is priceless.
This is the 90's and 5 million dollars a year says more about who's
boss than a title.
/Don
|
29.859 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Feb 26 1992 16:22 | 4 |
| It's being reported in the Red Sox conference that Jean Yawkey has just
died.
John
|
29.860 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 27 1992 09:39 | 14 |
| Jean Yawkey passed away yesterday after suffering a stroke last week.
Mrs. Yawkey was 83. The Yawkeys have owned the Red Sox since 1933.
The Flag at Winter Haven is flying at half mast.
Greenwell ended his silent treatment of the press by saying that he
resented Morgan letting him hang out to dry after the batting cage
incident with Mo Vaughn.
Tank of WBCN (please, no Tank bashing, it's been done to death)
supposedly spoke to Roger Clemens on the phone yesterday. Roger had no
idea that his showing up "late" for Spring Training would be viewed as
undermining the manager's authority. He just had some things to do
before camp officially opened. He's going to meet with Butch privately
when he gets into Winter Haven.
|
29.861 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey IS two!!! | Thu Feb 27 1992 09:46 | 12 |
| Lotsa stuff in the Boston area rags about the future of the team. I've heard
everything from they will go on status quo for ever, to they will be sold within
a year.
One thing in the Sox favor is that, unlike some ownership, the majority of the
profits of the company (JRY Corp.) goes back into the team. This means that
they can continue to spend the exorbinant amounts of money on free agents, etc.
Boston is so provincial, that if someone from outside New England tried to buy
the team, it would be like the Nintendo trying to buy the Mariners.
=Bob=
|
29.862 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Thu Feb 27 1992 09:53 | 10 |
| Will McDonough was talking about the Yawkeys on the radio yesterday
afternoon. Tom Yawkey told his GMs he didn't want to lose money, BUT
he also didn't care if he made money. That's why the Sox have had one
of the highest payrolls for so long. Jean continued the tradition.
WD also had this observation: "The Sox and Fenway are worth
$150 million. If somebody borrows that much money to buy the team, at
10% interest, their interest payments alone will take up the first $15
million of income each year. Look for a lot of cahnges if they're
sold."
Denny
|
29.863 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Greenwell talks, Roger balks | Thu Feb 27 1992 10:32 | 13 |
| McDonough also said that Mrs. Yawkey gave lots of money to inner
city althetic leagues, and that it angered him when people spoke of the Red
Sox as a racist organization. My feeling is that if she had made these
contributions public it could've gone a long way in repairing relations
with the black community, and change the perception of the organization that
black players have. He then ragged on a Globe series done a while back
about the Red Sox and racial issues, a series that I thought was fairly
factual. Whenever this team is bought, I doubt you'll see the payroll that
it has now. The cable television revenues, while good are nowhere near
what the Yankees and Mets collect, and like Denny said somebody will be
paying interest on the loan secured to buy the team.
/Don
|
29.864 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Greenwell talks, Roger balks | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:22 | 1 |
| So what's the E.T.A. for the "Petulant One" (i.e. Roger Clemens)?
|
29.865 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:24 | 3 |
| � So what's the E.T.A. for the "Petulant One" (i.e. Roger Clemens)?
The last I heard, sometime this weekend.
|
29.866 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Greenwell talks, Roger balks | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:27 | 1 |
| So I assume he's concluded his bartending duties at the Velvet Elvis?
|
29.867 | | DEMING::MCKAY | | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:58 | 17 |
| Just saw a copy of the Red Sox schedule
Opening day is on Monday April 13 vs. Baltimore
Patriots day is on Monday April 20 vs. Toronto (I have my own tix Hawk)
Yankees weekend series is the LAST weekend of the year Oct 2,3,4
I have the weekend season deal and it's too bad the Yanks are coming to
town so late in the year. I suppose if the games actually meant
something in October, but I figure the division will be locked up
by the Sox in late September.....
You have to love Toronto coming in for Patriots day followed by the
Marathon. Sure to be a great day.
Jimbo
|
29.868 | Reason fer not showin'... | AKOCOA::PETERSON | | Thu Feb 27 1992 13:14 | 4 |
|
....Rogers just mad cuz Elvis has his own stamp now and he doesn't.
|
29.869 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 10:03 | 5 |
| Did Sid Fernandez and Mo Vaughn go to the same weight loss clinic?
And who's taking bets as to when His Royal Petulance will deign
to grace Camp Butch with his presence?
/Don
|
29.870 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Fri Feb 28 1992 10:47 | 2 |
| During the interview he did on TV Wed. night he said 'next week'.
Denny
|
29.871 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan is walking! | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:00 | 7 |
| > Did Sid Fernandez and Mo Vaughn go to the same weight loss clinic?
Guess we'll find out when the next round of Ultra-Slim Fast ads hits
the airwaves. :-)
py
|
29.872 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:13 | 1 |
| Imagine that. Mo lost 30 lbs. just by shaving his haid. ;^)
|
29.873 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:47 | 12 |
| Wade Boggs spent the winter working out in his new $30,000 gym he built
in his home....came to camp with a noticeable change in upper body
definition!!!! Squarer (is that a word?) shoulders and slimmer waist.
PARADE IN OCTOBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.874 | Still a lousy baserunner!! | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:51 | 5 |
| So he cain hit the ball harder off the wall and git thrown out at
first?
MikeL
|
29.875 | | BUCYK::ROBICHAUD | | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:55 | 3 |
| I believe he's next in line to fight Greenteeth.
/Don
|
29.876 | Parade in Oct.!! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 02 1992 07:35 | 3 |
| According to Gil Santos, Rocket checked into Chain o FLakes before 7
this AM. Now we cain all sleep at night!
Denny
|
29.877 | | RUGBY1::way | Hand me down my shootin' iron... | Mon Mar 02 1992 08:15 | 31 |
| I can't remember where I read it (it could have been The Globe, because
I read that last week at training, or it could have been the Courant
on Saturday morning), but I read an article/editorial on the Red Sox and
ownership possibilities.
The one thing that stuck out to me was the fact that if a new owner does
buy the team, that Fenway Park will probably go the way of the dinosaur.
The writer said that Fenway, while a small ballpark, has a ton of character
and is a link to baseball's historic past.
Personally, I like Fenway. The "ghosts" there are a lot more visible than
in other ballparks. It's more like Field of Dreams, where the guys walked
out of the corn.
When I go to Fenway, I can feel Ted Williams there, or Carlton Fisk,
or Yaz. I can remember Luis Tiant, with that crazy windup he had, or
Jim Lonborg in 1967....
I remember my Dad telling me how he went to Fenway, and telling me of
the Green Monster. I remember him telling me how he wanted to take
me to a game there, and I remember when we finally did. It's been something
I've always wanted to do when I have kids.... I hope it'll still be around.
I'd hate like hell to see them tear down Fenway. I mean, so many of the
wonderful parks where they used to play the game are gone, or so blatantly
remodeled.....
'Saw
|
29.878 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RogerWatch-Day10 | Mon Mar 02 1992 08:28 | 6 |
| If that's true Denny, I can't wait for the reaction when His
Royal Petulance goes to his locker! The milk carton with his picture
on it adds just the right touch. What are the odds that the first
team fight precedes the first spring training game?
/Don
|
29.879 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Mar 02 1992 08:37 | 16 |
| 'Saw, we all love Fenway but we have to face reality - it costs a lot
of money in renovations to keep that place going. Sooner or later
(Peter Gammons predicts within 15 years), the place will have to be
replaced. Fenway works to the Red Sox advantage in a lot of ways -
mostly because the small size forces people to buy tickets early. On
the other hand, it doesn't have the creature comforts a lot of stadiums
have, it has no parking, it can be hard to get to (face it, there are
a lot of folks who just don't like to take the T and prefer the
convenience of driving in, even if they pay through the nose for it and
sit in traffic for an hour) and it can't be expanded. I've often
thought and I still think the Red Sox have been quietly buying land
over the years in preparation for building the new stadium they need.
I agree with Gammons - Fenway will be gone eventually.
John
|
29.880 | | RUGBY1::way | Hand me down my shootin' iron... | Mon Mar 02 1992 09:11 | 5 |
| It would be nice if they could preserve it somehow, as a historical
site.... It is one of the few "old" parks left....
'Saw
|
29.881 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 02 1992 09:30 | 7 |
| I hear a reporter in USA Today is predicting that Sox will have a new
home in downtown Boston in 5 years...
Jeff Gray, the Sox reliever who suffered a stroke last season, is doing
quite well and says he'll be back on the Sox before the end of the
season. Jeff's been throwing from a mound for a couple of months now
and his velocity is in the 70's.
|
29.882 | How about turn it over to da Parks and Recreation Dept? | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Mar 02 1992 09:49 | 14 |
| MtM,
Regarding your prediction of a new stadium in 5 years!
Who you trying to jive anyway?????? If'n their lucky they MIGHT
have a building permit! The only thing that the PRM can do quicker
is raise taxes!
Pass me some of those 'schrooms. I wanna fanticize too!
I remain,
cold stone sober (for Monday),
Kev
|
29.883 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 02 1992 09:53 | 7 |
| � MtM,
�
� Regarding your prediction of a new stadium in 5 years!
Kev, grab another cup of coffee and reread what I wrote. That wasn't
my prediction, it was from the USA Today. You're starting to sound
like ACChris ;^).
|
29.884 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 02 1992 10:16 | 4 |
| With the location of Fenway, if they move to a new park the place is
history! The new owners, whoever they might be, won't be able to afford
not selling the land Fenway's on to some developer.
Denny
|
29.885 | look again (and don't edit it either!!!!!) | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Mar 02 1992 10:37 | 9 |
| MtM,
Ya didn't make *ANY* reference to a paper being the source. You
led me (us) to believe it was your PO&PB!
I remain,
easily misguided?,
Kev
|
29.886 | | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Mar 02 1992 10:41 | 8 |
|
OK. I'm wrong. I admit it. Sorry MtM, It's my fault. I didn't
read it correctly.
I remain,
asking forgiveness,
Kev
|
29.887 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RogerWatch-Day10 | Mon Mar 02 1992 11:05 | 6 |
| Will poor Jody Reed be able to get over the hurt and trauma of
being paid only 1.6 million dollars this year? And will having to deal
with this psychologically devastating problem affect his on-field
performance?
/Don
|
29.888 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Mon Mar 02 1992 11:34 | 7 |
| Gotta love what the Bosox practical jokers done to Roger's locker.
Rumor has it that Greenwell set up his cassette/radio with Aretha
Franklin's "RESPECT" in Jody's locker.
What a fun group (for now)
MikeL
|
29.889 | better reserve me a rubber room!! | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Mon Mar 02 1992 12:56 | 10 |
| I expect Jody Reed to hit .285 and be a valuable contributor to the
1992 World Champion RedSox.
To qualify my position, I also think Matt Young will be a shining light
this year!!! :^)
Nelly
|
29.890 | His Highness doesn't believe in FUN | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Mon Mar 02 1992 16:20 | 4 |
|
Betcha Roger hires Mo Vaughn to kick Greenwall's butt for him......
;^)
|
29.891 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | For DUTY and HUMANITY | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:12 | 13 |
| �< Note 29.890 by CNTROL::CHILDS "make the right choice, Tsongas" >
-< His Highness doesn't believe in FUN >-
� Betcha Roger hires Mo Vaughn to kick Greenwall's butt for him......
Mike, haven't you heard ? Ole Rog has been working out wif
Chuck Norris, he can Greenie's butt hisself now.
:-)
Chap
|
29.892 | Roger & me woulda been buddies in high school, '69-'73... | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:26 | 7 |
| Roger Clemens is a lot like (no, not rugby!) "pro" rasslin'. Years
ago, he was the poster boy good guy role model media darling. Now,
he's portrayed as the no good bad boy media rebel. I used to hate the
guy, now he's my hero. Kinda like Jim McMahon...
Hawk
|
29.893 | WWF | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:29 | 2 |
| Roger Clemens looks like the 'Mountie'!
Denny
|
29.894 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:21 | 19 |
| I saw Super Fly Jimmy Snooka lasted night. Boy has he changed....
Loved the song he used to (still?) comes out with.... Super, Super, Super Fly.
What ever happened to Ax and Smash....
What ever happened to Rick Derringer (from my hometown), you know,
Rock 'n Roll Hootchy Coo....
If Roger has been working out with Chuck Norris, does that mean he
is gonna throw a lot more beanballs this year? Will John Marzano have
to come out and tackles batters like last year? (btw, Marzano made an
EXCELLENT tackle that time).....
'Saw
|
29.895 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | The ProdiROGERgal Son Returns! | Tue Mar 03 1992 12:18 | 7 |
| In the true Colonel Eagan/Ted Williams tradition, Globe writer
Dan Shaughnessy has taken upon himself the enormous task of informing
the paper's readers of what a blight on society, what a threat to
everything good and wholesome, what a truly despicable human being
Roger Clemens is.
/Don
|
29.896 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Forgot to cut my imbecilical cord | Tue Mar 03 1992 13:23 | 5 |
|
> What ever happened to Rick Derringer
He got loaded one night and was fired.
|
29.897 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 13:52 | 21 |
| Slasher,
Do you mean that Col. Eagan used to tell everyone how bad Williams was?
Or do you mean that Williams has told everyone how bad Clemons is?
Dickstah! Don't you be makin' fun of one of my homeys..... (Actually, I
never knew Derringer went to G-bury, except that they had a "home grown"
segment on a local station, and played some Derringer because he was from
town)....
Rock and roll hootchy-coo, Lawdy mama light my fuse,
Rock and roll hootchy-coo, truck on out and spread the news!
'Saw
|
29.898 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Tue Mar 03 1992 14:12 | 30 |
| re: a few back,
Don (?),
I was amazed/pissed to read Shaunessy's (sp?) column this morning!!
He writes as if he's speaking for all of us in regards to our being
owed an explanation and/or apology. I can only speak for myself, but
it is MHO that I am not owed an apology from Roger!!! That he honored
his contract and arrived 'in time' is alright with me!! Given that his
belated arrival was looked upon as showing up Hobson, his apology to
Butch may have been warranted, but not to anyone else (except, perhaps
his teammates)!!
The writer suggests that the player *OWES* the 'public' a peak inside
his head......whereas I believe that the player owes the paying public
an honest effort....and anything provided beyond that is icing!!!
I pay to watch Clemons PITCH, and nothing else!!!!! The fact that many
consider him to be an *sshole does not bother me at all.....in fact it
gives me and Roger something in common!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Helps to Hurl,
Nelly
teammates).
|
29.899 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | The ProdiROGERgal Son Returns! | Tue Mar 03 1992 14:24 | 5 |
| I think Eddie Anvilhaid's right. A public whipping of Roger
Clemens in Schaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium with the proceeds to
go to the Jimmy Fund, and use a cat o' nine tails!
/Don
|
29.900 | Clemens wrong; but we got one vindictive media in Boston | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 03 1992 16:28 | 47 |
|
> In the true Colonel Eagan/Ted Williams tradition, Globe writer
> Dan Shaughnessy has taken upon himself the enormous task of informing
> the paper's readers of what a blight on society, what a threat to
> everything good and wholesome, what a truly despicable human being
> Roger Clemens is.
[Reposted from RED_SOX conference]
I must be missing something, because I didn't think Clemens' interview
was all that bad. Sure, it was chock full of the usual disconnected
speech fragments, but his responses to the questions (actually, more
like one question over and over: why didn't you call?) were easy
enough to understand. Hell, the sitting President of the United States
more often than not manages to sound like a blathering idiot when he's
quoted verbatim.
Here's an example of one of Shaughnessy's interpretations from the
interview:
Clemens: "I think for me, being here and seeing what we got on our
sleeve, I think that's basically the most important thing,
about Mrs. Yawkey being gone... When the season gets started
and things get under way it'll be great, but right now,
again, we lost a big void in Boston with Mrs. Yawkey passing.
That's what we were pressing so hard to win so just a part of
their family could enjoy something. And I'm kind of feeling
let down by that, we weren't able to do that..."
Shaughnessy: It would be easy to raise objections when an inconsiderate
superstar uses the death of a beloved owner to take heat
off himself...
It's pretty easy to see what's going on here. Essentially, there are
certain reporters in this town who will go to any lengths to run an
imperfect athlete down. Why did the Boston media allow a silly story
on Clemens' absence upstage the story of the passing of an era in Boston
sports history? Why is it considered objectionable for Clemens to
speak his mind on Mrs. Yawkey (deliver a tribute actually) instead of
answering the question about the phone call again and again and again?
I completely understand why Roger Clemens refuses to speak to the
media.
glenn
|
29.901 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:10 | 17 |
| After entering my reply yesterday, I looked at Shaughnessy's article
again and realized my error.....it was not Shaughnessy's Globe article,
but rather Michael Gee's Herald article that I had read which really
pissed me off!! Did anyone out there read Gee's column yesterday?
If so, did you think he came off as speaking for everyone? He seemed
to think that he and the rest of us deserved an apology from Clemens
for his late arrival!! *I* certainly need no apology from Clemens...he
did nothing to *ME*!! His tardiness is between him and his coach and
teammates.....who do members of the media think they are that they are
owed an apology for his being late?
Gee's column was a perfect example of the media's iflated image of
their self-worth.
Nelly
|
29.902 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:12 | 4 |
| Some of the TV reporters down there were steamed because they were
supposed to come home before last weekend and had to stay a few extra
days waiting for His Lateness.
Denny
|
29.903 | Red Sox controversy - the '92 season | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | BearCATS >>> Buckeyes | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:14 | 12 |
|
Nelly, maybe the jist of it is that Roger's late arrival is being
viewed by the Herald writer as a lack of effort... if this is the
case, then he owes an appology to the people who pay his salary..
namely, the Boston fans.
These overpaid cry-babies don't need our sympathy or protection.. for
the money they make they deserve every bit of heat they take (maybe
more). For the good of the team, Roger should have been in camp on
time!
/Jeff
|
29.904 | His paycheck doesn't warrant any fanasskissing... | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:56 | 6 |
| For the good of his highly respectable bad boy image, I'm glad Roger
showed when he did, and kinda disappointed that he didn't wait a little
longer...
Hawk
|
29.905 | It's the rag, not the writer. | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:15 | 8 |
|
I saw some of the Gee column (I'd never BUY the Herald, I just read Mike Leary's
sometimes).
I kinda feel bad for Gee. I think he is a competant journalist, but since he
writes for the Herald, he has to pull hatchet jobs like this to sell newspapers.
Kinda like the reason Phil and Oprah talk about sex all the time.
=Bob=
|
29.906 | Gee whizzes | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:17 | 1 |
|
|
29.907 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:27 | 6 |
| �He seemed
� to think that he and the rest of us deserved an apology from Clemens
� for his late arrival!!
Judging from the Red Sox conference and what I've heard about the radio
call in shows, the reporter has his finger on the pulse of New England.
|
29.908 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:29 | 7 |
| Roger has been named the starting pitcher for the Sox Grapefruit League
opener against the Tigers on Saturday. Viola gets the start on Sunday.
Each is expected to go 3 innings.
Jeff, you can say alot of things about Roger Clemens (Mike C. has said
most of them), but one thing that can't be said is that he shows a lack
of effort.
|
29.909 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YouDownWithRichieHebner? | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:45 | 5 |
| I don't think an apology is enough. How about a week in leg
irons? Or maybe he has to pitch the entire exhibition season with
a scarlet number.
/Don
|
29.910 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:47 | 3 |
| We noticed Dickstah wasn't wearing Rocket's number on his shirt
lasted night. Musta been his own way of protesting.
Denny
|
29.911 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:01 | 4 |
| I think Roger needs a little session with Pepper and "Purple Rain" to
get his big main's ego in check.....8^)
'Saw
|
29.912 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:07 | 13 |
| This Clemens thang is way overblown. So the guy's a balloonheaded
jerk. If he apologized to Hobson it's between them, He don't owe me
squat. The man comes ready to pitch. He'll perform and get his near
20 wins or so. I might think he's a vacuum-brain personally, but
give me his right arm and work ethic anyday.
Now Boggs is anudder story. louigi boorman musta coughed up his
12-aig breakfast when he heard Chicken man stating that the 28 million
that Sandberg received were "within his parameters" Haw Haw. Mortgage
the farm, babeee, or trade the dude or let him fly the coop..
MikeL
|
29.913 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Software : Art Of The State | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:15 | 1 |
| Am I the only guy to notice that Butch Hobson walks like a pansy ?
|
29.914 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YouDownWithRichieHebner? | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:21 | 3 |
| No Way MikeL! I'm a fan and I want my pound of flesh!
/Don
|
29.915 | Viola will be the ACE by July.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | The SYSTEM has spung a leak | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:32 | 9 |
|
> No Way MikeL! I'm a fan and I want my pound of flesh!
/Don
I hear he's got plenty to spare /Don......especially between the ears!!!
;^)
|
29.916 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:43 | 11 |
| Re Michael Gee
I liked him when he first started out - he wrote the sports column for
"B.A.D." better known as the Phoenix. Really great stuff he wrote back
then. Methinks the Herald was able to offer more money, and
opportunity, for a sports wrtier, then the Phoenix did - and he
probably has to satisfy the sports editorial policy of the Herald. He
had talent. I haven't seen his stuff in years, but it sounds like he's
regressed.
JD
|
29.917 | Dare you to knock that Duracell off Butch's shoulder... | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:45 | 6 |
| > Am I the only guy to notice that Butch Hobson walks like a pansy ?
No, Dock, there are plenty of other limp-wristed guys that have noticed
what you have... :-o
|
29.918 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:48 | 12 |
| He may walk like a pansy, but his wife is pretty hot.
He's a nice guy too. Used to manage in New Britsky, and would always
stop and chat if you caught him when he wasn't too busy.
I hope he does well.....
Can't do any worse than some others....
'Saw
|
29.919 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:58 | 4 |
| Anyone notice when Rocket and Butch had their little jogging chat
that Roger still had his walkmain on? Probably never heard a word
Hobson said.
Denny
|
29.920 | But he cain pitch! | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 11:13 | 3 |
| HAHA Denny,
Was the audio version of "How to win Friends and Influence People"
|
29.921 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:04 | 28 |
| Re back a few:
Was the writer REALLY on the pulse of the fans, or did the media cause
the pulse to quicken, with it's never ending crap about a guy not
showing up early?
I know I'm generalizing, but I can't stand Boston writers. Or even
some of the writers on the local rag. Every one of these guys is an
expert. They all know what has to be done. But, for some strange
reason, NONE of them play the game at the pro level, never mind the
BIGS. Craig Mustard is a prime example of the airway version of this
type of "reporting". What an egotistical jerk.
All I ever seen to read or hear is that the "local team" must win it
all. Never mind if they have the horses or not, that's a management
problem. Never mind that a backbone type of player may get hurt, it
was either his fault for playing when he shouldn't have, or he took a
chance he shouldn't have, or the manager should have known that he
might get hurt, or the general manager didn't have an adequate backup
available. Day after day, sport after sport. It really has taken away
a lot of the fun I used to have when following sports.
As soon as I had heard the very first report about Clemens not being in
camp, I just knew that it would be blown totally out of proportion.
Ho hum, same crap, different day.
lEe
|
29.922 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:21 | 10 |
| Lee -
Hey, quit that bashing of Boston, or Mac will get really mad at you.
Geez, I'm sick of all you guys bashing Boston, and the Boston papers,
and the Boston pitchers.
~/~
JD
|
29.923 | | RUGBY1::way | KO: we're 2 legit 2 quit | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:27 | 7 |
| JD,
We've never bashed a pitcher as long as it was full of beer....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.924 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YouDownWithRichieHebner? | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:28 | 5 |
| I agree Lee about Craig Mustard, he doesn't quite cut it. He
tries to spice up his show with sensationalism, but in my opinion
he's yellow.
/Don
|
29.925 | | CELTIK::JACOB | dan'l ain't getting near MY daughter | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:29 | 5 |
| re.923
did drain QUITE a few lasted night, though, eh Saw??
JaKe
|
29.926 | you're a GAS, Slash! | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:31 | 1 |
|
|
29.927 | ;-) | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:51 | 7 |
| Slash -
I hear he's a real hot dog, but some folks just think he's a weiner. I
wouldn't relish having to listen to him, that's for sure. He should
quit while he's on a roll...
JD
|
29.928 | You can't believe every thing you read, especially in Boston | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 13:00 | 27 |
|
I think you missed Lee's point, JD. With apologies due for maybe
overgeneralizing a bit, I think in order of priority you've bashed the
Boston fans, then the Boston management and players, and maybe
lastly the Boston sports media. I would also definitely have to put
the Boston sports media at the top of my own hit list (with exceptions
made for a few real journalists-- or the closest a sports reporter can
come to that-- like Peter Gammons). I've never seen anything like it
in any other city I've lived in or visited. New York might match the
Boston sports media for sensationalism, but definitely not for the
level of sarcasm and vindictiveness.
I think that in a lot of ways the Boston sports media has distorted the
real feelings of a large number of fans. Boston Red Sox fans are
always stereotyped as whining, cynical complainers who refuse to
appreciate the general success of the franchise over the last 25 years
(I for one am appreciative, championship or not). They are taken to
task for it by the national media. While obviously a lot of that
bitterness does exist, why is there hardly a mention of summer after
summer of a sold-out Fenway Park full of diehard fans, many full of
hope or out enjoying themselves just the same. Yet those fans are
usually portrayed as fatalistic masochists who just can't help
themselves. It makes for great copy, but from what I've experienced
firsthand it just ain't the total truth...
glenn
|
29.929 | Kielbasa this ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Software : Art Of The State | Wed Mar 04 1992 13:15 | 6 |
| re .927
JD, let's just say that Slash is ain't a weenie ...
Pigs in a blanket comes to mind ... :-)
|
29.930 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Wed Mar 04 1992 13:30 | 15 |
| I'm not familiar with the Boston Media.
Is the sensationalism you mention found in what should be factual reporting,
or in their editorializing.
In the Hartford Courant, there are factual pieces and then commentary/editorial
type columns. The editorial columns can be quite controversial (if one
reads the letters to the SPORTSeditor)....
I just wondered how it's done up there....
'Saw
|
29.931 | Boston Papers have no obhective reporting | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Wed Mar 04 1992 14:26 | 14 |
| There is very little "straight reporting" in the Boston papers. Even the game
stories are laced with writer's opinions and prejudices. I suspect that the
Boston papers do this to compete with each other and to differentiate themselves
from local rags. I agree that in most of the big city newspapers I have read,
you do not get this to the degree you have it in Boston.
I read the Courant (a newspaper named after a spice, hmmm), and the
Providence Journal as often as I get a chance to, and there is no comparison
in the level of non-editorialized reporting.
I personally would like to read a straight account of the game (or skip it if I
watched the game), and then read a column about it with editorial content.
=Bob=
|
29.932 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Wed Mar 04 1992 14:39 | 12 |
| Glenn.
Nice note. My note to Lee, I thought, was a fairly obvious joke.
Should have put the smiley in.
And complain all you want about teh Globe sports writers - compared to
most papers I've read - they are a lot better. The guy who used to do
hockey - Rosa - was the absolute worst though. He blamed every Bruins
loss on the refs.
JD
|
29.933 | | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Wed Mar 04 1992 14:59 | 19 |
| I heard someone mention on a sporting show that the Hartford Courant
is the oldest continuous daily in the US.
It's not a bad paper. Recently they've taken a very pro-Weicker stand, which
bugs me a bit, but on the whole, they're good.
There Sports staff in my mind has always been exemplary, going back to
Bill Lee (whom I started reading in the Late Sixties). His column was called
"Grist From the Mill" and his slogan was "With Malice Towards None" and that's
the way he editorialized.
I am really hooked on the separation of factual reports and editorials.
Courant (not a spice, Lindsey's Dad ;^)) is think comes from the same route
as currier or something like that....
'Saw
|
29.934 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:03 | 10 |
| Saw -
I used to go out with a girl who worked at the Courant. Reason I know
Hartford so good. ANyway, the Courant, is the oldest continuous daily,
and it owned by the same folks who one the L.A. Times. They have (had)
a decent profit-sharing/bonus system. She used to get a bonus at
Christmas time equal to 6 weeks of pay. I always managed to visit her
that weekend ;-)
JD
|
29.935 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:06 | 2 |
| I think a courant is a fruit, no?
Denny
|
29.936 | | RUGBY1::way | KO says "We're 2 legit 2 quit" | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:06 | 6 |
| Well, now that you're married and all, if she still works there do you
have her number????
8^)
'Saw
|
29.937 | | RUGBY1::way | KO says "We're 2 legit 2 quit" | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:07 | 8 |
| Yeah, the fruit is spelled currant.
Since the paper started in 17** something, it's probably one of them
colonial type words no one uses anymore except MrT when he's on a roll....
'Saw
|
29.938 | There's good and bad but the criticisms can get petty.. | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:17 | 40 |
|
> Nice note. My note to Lee, I thought, was a fairly obvious joke.
I know you were joking, but there's an essence of truth to the Boston
fan-bashing, so I just made reference to it as different from Boston
media-bashing. No big deal; it wasn't the point of my response to
debate you on the matter, but rather to give my thoughts on the Boston
sports media as a Boston sports fan. I think the perception of the
attitudes of each as one and the same is wrong. I think there are more
level-headed, appreciative sports fans in Boston than is generally
accepted.
> And complain all you want about teh Globe sports writers - compared to
> most papers I've read - they are a lot better.
I agree. It's strange, but I do find the Boston Globe sports pages to
be worth reading most of the time, because as far as sportswriters go
most of them aren't bad writers, and in spite of the common accusation
of Boston provincialism they do provide fairly comprehensive national
coverage compared to the papers I've read in comparably sized cities.
Basically I object to a lot of the messages within the medium but not
the medium itself, but even then not without exception. I actually
like Bob Ryan-- I think he can think freely without his knee jerking
simultaneously (even if I don't agree with him on something), he
writes fairly well and he's even been known to blast the Red Sox
beat writers and the pessimistic fan on the street for their constant
whining and crying. I think both Ryan and Peter Gammons are honest
about what they're writing rather than just holding their noses to
make a buck for the paper, and the difference is noticed.
On the other hand, the TV sports guys, maybe without exception (I'm
undecided on Mike Lynch, who usually shows some decency but with the
occasional relapse from time to time) are smarmy, know-it-all cynics
with no apparent function other than to botch scores, show goofy
highlights, and deliver ridiculous commentary. I credit Bob Lobel as
the father of this unappealing genre of "news" reporting. Thank god
for SportsCenter...
glenn
|
29.939 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YouDownWithRichieHebner? | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:20 | 6 |
| Should've been around when Clark Booth was the sports anchor
on channel 4. The guy was one of the best. He still hangs out
in the press box at the Gaahden to watch the Broons�. He does
sports pieces once and a while.
/Don
|
29.940 | Yup, Clark Booth was too good for sports (and got out) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:28 | 1 |
|
|
29.941 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:29 | 7 |
| On occasion I enjoy John Dennis. He can be a journalist first,
smarmy entertainer second, when he has to (unlike jerky but likeable
Lobel).
I liked Jack Edwards when he was here.
MikeL
|
29.942 | You dat old Waugamain? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YouDownWithRichieHebner? | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:30 | 1 |
|
|
29.943 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:33 | 9 |
|
> -< You dat old Waugamain? >-
Nah, but I've seen Booth wax eloquent on sports before so I'm using my
imagination a little bit. Sort of like how I daydream about how things
must have been when Upton Bell was in charge of a football team... ;-)
glenn
|
29.944 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:37 | 4 |
| Dadgum youngsters
I remember when Eddie Anvilhaid had his own TV show (wif the other
Huddlers) in the early 70's
|
29.945 | Ding and Dong | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:44 | 3 |
| Hey! Upton Bell drafted John Hannah. The man's a jeanyus!
Remeber Bob Lobell and Upton Bell's radio show?
Denny
|
29.946 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:49 | 11 |
|
> Hey! Upton Bell drafted John Hannah. The man's a jeanyus!
True, and he did a pretty good job as a player personnel man with my
old Baltimore Colts, too. I just can't figure out if Upton Bell is an
old guy who looks young or a young guy who's been living too much of
the hard life. He's kind of a goof now, but I've heard less funny
sports people...
glenn
|
29.947 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:50 | 4 |
| Yup, preceded by "I know everything,you know jacks#&t" Guy Maniella
MikeL
|
29.948 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:54 | 2 |
| I liked Guy, wish he was still on.
Denny
|
29.949 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Julie's in the Drug Squad | Wed Mar 04 1992 15:59 | 10 |
|
Well, smack my crack and call me a homer but for my money the
Globe has the best Sunday sports page I've read, especially now
that Gammons is back. McMullan is a bit weak as the basketball
writer (Ryan was better) but Borges is a fine boxing writer, he
also handles football quite well. McDonough is an excellent football
writer and Shaugnessy and Madden are passable columnists. The rest of
the staff is pretty good too. As for the Globe's rival the Herald you
couldn't make me read it.
|
29.950 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:06 | 6 |
| The Globe wins national awards all the time for it's sports page. I
agree with most of what you said Tommy, but Borges always seems to have
a chip on his shoulder. He hates Mike Tyson. and because of his
exposing the Pats' drug problems has had trouble with them.
Denny
|
29.951 | And the bias gets bigger when he's on a national platform | LUNER::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:53 | 9 |
| re .938
Glenn, we'll have to agree to disagree on Bob Cryin' ("bout the
Celtics) of the Globe.
He is such a Celtics apologist, that if old Red Aurbach (sp) had a
Minister of Propaganda, Ryan would be it.
Doc
|
29.952 | Would that be the guy who says Magic is the best ever? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:55 | 1 |
|
|
29.953 | If he did, I suspect he was in C.M.A. mode ... | LUNER::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Wed Mar 04 1992 17:07 | 15 |
| If so Glenn, he's *very* reluctantly jumping on the bandwagon.
Because a few years back in Dick Vitale's mag (the equiv. of Maz's
baseball preview, and Don Heinrich's football preview), Bird was the
best, and no one in the same time zone. I think Russell got 2nd, and
Magic was 4th or 7th.
Ryan's comment was that Magic "was one of the few who was on the same
wavelength as Bird."
He also ranked Bill Walton as the greatest center of all time. I think
Russell was next in his all-important opinion, then the rest of the herd.
Hell, if I had worn Celtic green, he probably would have ranked me
among the top point guards ...
|
29.954 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Mar 05 1992 07:09 | 40 |
| For some reason, the Sunday edition of the Globe does seem to be more
objective than the daily. I don't know why, it just seems that way to
me.
Another aspect of media that gets to me are the call-in shows. Sure,
there are some very good callers, but I get so damn tired of guys
calling in with their idea of a great trade. Doesn't matter what sport
or what team, they've got some unbelievable trade in mind. And the
host very often gets sidetracked into discussing that trade and his own
version. If it was so damn easy, how come no one has figured it out to
the point that his team is a constant champion, year after year? Sure,
there have been dynasties, but not lately, and that was back when there
weren't the drafts we now have. Money was a big part of the old method
of getting players, as was territorial rights. It's a different
business now.
In talking to everyday fans, such as Sox fans, I often hear the
optimistic view as the training camp goes into gear, and it stays on
thru the season if the Sox are in contention. I don't hear the
negative crap nearly as often as I would expect to hear it, based on
the media accounts.
Take the situation with Boggs. I heard radio reports that BIG trouble
is on the horizon in regards to his new contract. That he puts himself
on the same level as Ryne Sanderson, or even above. You know, worth
the same, some 7+M$ a year. Well, I didn't read the same thing in one
paper, I read where he said something to the effect that it gives him
more range to play with. While I completely agree that players are
making too much money for what they do (some players, anyway), it's the
Chi owners fault. They skipped right over the 6M$ figure, which no one
has made to date. The highest was 5+M$ before this latest signing.
What the h*ll is the matter with these so-called businessmen?
As to the players, What they get isn't really any of my business, but
if it's publicized, then I've got the right to be very critical when
one of them carps about being treated badly, like Jody Reed. Trade
places with me Jody, for just 1 year. I'll be financially set for
life, and you just might realize what a racket you've got.
lEe
|
29.955 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Forgot to cut my imbecilical cord | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:07 | 17 |
|
Right now I don't see Boggs being on the Sox roster next year, as I
don't see the Sox ready to offer him anywhere near what he's hinting
at. I get the impression that Boggs feels he's underpaid, and the only
way he's going to know for sure is by testing the open market.
Before it's all over, Wade will wind up being PO'd at the Sox and sign
elsewhere even if they match the best offer.
I'm a Wade fan, and it would be nice to see him finish his career here,
but I'm afraid there's another team that will give this 36 year old a
four or five year contract for $4 or $5 million or so. If I were Sox
management I wouldn't do it, so "S'long Wade, it's been good to know
ya."
Dickstah
|
29.956 | At least they got rid of Charlie Pierce | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:18 | 17 |
| One thing I respected about Boggs was his choice in not bitching about
the relative low pay scale he was at. He negotiated a contract and
stuck by its terms even when lesser players passed him by. As he said
a contract is a contract. I think that will be in his favor during
new contract talks.
Regarding the Herald, Steve Bulpett is a respected journalist covering
the Celtics. I also enjoy Gerry Callahan's irreverent slants on
occasion. I used to like Mike Shalin's and Karen Guregian's work, but
what the hail happened to them?? The rest are mere shallow fluff,
including the worst journalist (if you want to call him that),
I've ever read (cringe!), Joe Fitzgerald. Bake this cake Joe, and
I hope Mr. Fugi bodyslams ya!
MikeL
|
29.957 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Mar 05 1992 10:10 | 15 |
| FYI.....
Wade Boggs is 33 years old. He has stated that he intends to play 6 or
7 more years.....and his agent says that a Sox offer of $5M/year would
be in the ballpark they're looking for!!!
Boggs has been very fair in his contract dealings with the Sox in the
past....and as was stated earlier, he has never cried 'renegotiation'
once in his career. I'd personally be bummed if he didn't finish his
career in Boston!! Do I think that the Sox' management will, in my
opinion, do the right thing.....NO!! But then again, I thought they
would have screwed up long before this and lost him already!!!
Nelly
|
29.958 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Forgot to cut my imbecilical cord | Thu Mar 05 1992 10:24 | 16 |
|
> Boggs has been very fair in his contract dealings with the Sox in the
> past....and as was stated earlier, he has never cried 'renegotiation'
And I laud him for his stand on this. Funny though, how "integrity"
and "doing the right thing" is such an out-of-the-ordinary thing
these days that some players feel they have to be rewarded even more
for simply doing what they're suposed to do. This isn't a knock on
Boggs, though, just an observation of baseball business in general.
I tend to side with management when a player walks out of the office
thinking he Melvined management on a long term contract, then cries
'foul' a year down the road when his salary doesn't bring him the
proper 'respect.'
Dickstah
|
29.959 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 06 1992 12:52 | 15 |
| � And I laud him for his stand on this. Funny though, how "integrity"
� and "doing the right thing" is such an out-of-the-ordinary thing
� these days that some players feel they have to be rewarded even more
� for simply doing what they're suposed to
I don't think it's that out of the ordinary, Dickstah. I think it
seems that way because it's the renogiators that are grabbing the
headlines. If things are going well, we generally don't hear/read
about it.
The Sox have a bargaining chip in their favor when dealing with Wade
Boggs in the person of Scott Cooper. At one time it was projected that
Boggs would move over to 1B to make room for Cooper. With Carlos
Quintana, Mo Vaughn, and Jack Clark on the roster this will be
extremely difficult.
|
29.960 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Mar 31 1992 12:01 | 2 |
| Socks just waived Dana Keicker(sp?).
Denny
|
29.961 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Tue Mar 31 1992 13:07 | 3 |
| Too bad he doesn't play football, the Pats could use another Keicker.
lEe
|
29.962 | Well, that must be it for the rest of the season! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Wed Apr 01 1992 09:49 | 18 |
|
OK all you sinners, better repent and do all the right religious stuff.
The end of the world is at hand!!!
Ya wanna know how *I* came to be blessed with this information? Why
it's quite simple,
Matt Young pitched SIX (6) innings of shutout baseball yesterday!
Methinks we'd all better drop to our knees RIGHT NOW!!!!!!
I remain,
looking for a place of worship,
Kev
|
29.963 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 01 1992 09:56 | 3 |
| Slasher's been trying to tell us all along that (Door)Matt Young
would come around!
Denny
|
29.964 | Ouch | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:07 | 15 |
| The other night, ESPN did an "Oscars" thing and invented some new names
for some movies about baseball. "The Prince Of Slides", "Deer Strikes
Out" and so on. Best one was ...
"The Hunt For The Red Sox In October"
Priceless.
Bob Hunt
P.S. SportsChannel NY replayed 1986 Game 6 lasted night as part of the
"Greatest Games Ever Played" series. Ouch, that was painful to watch
again. You kept hoping that this time Schiraldi would get the third
strike but noooooooooooo ... Tough to watch and I'm not even a diehard Sox
fan.
|
29.965 | Please, stop using that S-word! (Calvin S@#$%^%%^) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:11 | 1 |
|
|
29.966 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:20 | 15 |
| Dammit Bob,
I'm bleeding again. The scar opened up and you'd swear I've got stigmata...
Hang on, I've got to get a Kleenex to soak up some of this blood....
Happens every time someone mentions that S-word, or the B-word....
Damn, gonna need more stitches!
'Saw
|
29.967 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:21 | 2 |
| I thought the s-word was (S)tanley.
Denny
|
29.968 | | SALEM::DODA | Clinton: Stoner with a boner | Wed Apr 01 1992 11:54 | 5 |
| Bob,
This spring "Silence of the Bats" would be appropriate.
daryll
|
29.969 | Nah....It can't be for real | SALES::THILL | | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:54 | 3 |
| I heard that bit on Matt Young pitching 6 innings og shutout ball, but
it was laced with so many other improbables that I figured that it was
another April Fool's collij prank
|
29.970 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:09 | 7 |
| Schiraldi set up Stanley for the disaster. McNamara never should have
pulled Clemens and he should have started Boyd in the 7th game.
It kills me to even think about it. I seriously thought about tossing
my TV out the window that night.
John
|
29.971 | The Can probably should have been first out of the pen, though | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:15 | 13 |
|
> Schiraldi set up Stanley for the disaster. McNamara never should have
> pulled Clemens and he should have started Boyd in the 7th game.
Everyone says this in hindsight, but I wanted Hurst out there for Game
7 and he actually did a pretty good job. He tired in the sixth after
pitching five shoutout innings and the Sox brought in that damn S%^%^&&^
person again to blow his umpteenth game of the postseason. Would the
bullpen have held up better for the Oil Can? Would Oil Can have given
up no more than two runs over 7+ innings? We'll never know...
glenn
|
29.972 | Bring Can in from the pen | SALES::THILL | | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:29 | 8 |
| Well, what was wrong with bringing in the Can out of the bullpen to
pitch the rest of Game 7 after Hurst got tired? If you remember, Boyd
was supposed to start game 7, but it was rained out, and by the
following day, Hurst was rested enough to pitch. I can't argue with
that, but you gotta feel for the Can having a chance to pitch game 7
take away.
Tom
|
29.973 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:52 | 9 |
|
I agree, Tom, Boyd should have had a shot before that procession of
misfits got the call (as indicated in my reply title). Still, there's
no way you could deny Hurst the ball to start that game with the
postseason he'd had. By contrast, in Boyd's only Series start, he'd
been hammered badly...
glenn
|
29.974 | Enough Already | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Wed Apr 01 1992 14:57 | 27 |
| No, No NOOO!!
It was that big fat slob Gedman who should have been charged with a
passed ball and who had no idea HOW to calm Schiraldi down. That tub of
lard is the reason we lost.
Can you see if Fisk or Pena or even Sammy White or Bob Tillman would
have been catching? They woulda been out there calming the kid down.
But not Twinkie-king Gedman!!
The other culprit was MacNamara. He had no logical reason to keep a
one-legged 1st baseman on the field with a lead in the 9th. He had used
Stapleton all year as a late inning replacement. His stupidity rivals
the use of Butch (Throw the ball in the Dugout) Hobson in the thick of
a pennant race by that master of bonehaid moves, Zipperhead.
Schiraldi had 1/2 season worth of major leagure experience. The kid was
responsible for even getting the Sox into the Series. Bob Stanley was
one of the classiest guys ever to play for the Sox. Bill Buckner,
though an arrogant, self-centered clown, was a heck of an offensive
threat.
Talk about handling pitchers by MacNamara is an oxymoron. He won
despite his incompetence.
Rich
|
29.975 | It's healthy to get it all out... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:20 | 26 |
|
Nah, you're all messed up, Rich. ;-) The Potato Head wasn't on the top
of his game that night, to be sure, but he's taken a bum rap from the
Legion of Bob Stanley Apologists (LBSA) all these years. First off, he
had nothing to do with S%^$%##%$'s lack of success in Game 6. S%^%^%$%%
had been in there way too long. How many closers do you know of who go
a full three innings, 50+ pitchers in an outing? Yet the ultimate
Non-Thinking Man's Manager McNamara allowed him to give up three
consecutive sharp hits before figuring out that the game wasn't over
yet.
Secondly, this mass delusion causing the LBSA to blame Gedman for
allowing a wild pitch and sticking poor, poor Bob Stanley with the goat
horns because it supposedly should have been scored a passed ball is a
lot of nonsense. How many times do you see a catcher set up outside and
then the pitcher almost hits the batter with the ball (Mookie did a
great job just getting out of the way!)? Face it, Stanley had the
chicken bone firmly lodged and was badly in need of the Heimlich. After
the game, he said the ball "just didn't feel right" in his hand. He,
like Schiraldi, was obviously fogged in by the pressure...
Thirdly, Gedman had a pretty damn good postseason. No Gedman in the
1986 ALCS, no trip to the World Series. Look it up!
glenn
|
29.976 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:22 | 12 |
| I don't know if it's in this conference or not, (ie this iteration of
SPORTS) but I sure would love to see that note JD put in again
about the Bus coming into Boston and all the kids having the nightmares
and the old men yelling "Throw the ball"....
I don't remember if it's in here or not.
Still have that JD????
'Saw
|
29.977 | | SHALOT::MEDVID | twisting in the water | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:24 | 5 |
| Boy, this one is better than the one pulled on Saw! Bob Hunt enters
one sentence about 1986 and you guys get April Fooled into reliving
your worst nightmare. Too funny.
--dan'l
|
29.978 | Something bad happened in 1986? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:27 | 1 |
|
|
29.979 | You talking about this, Saw? | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Anybody but the Dukies | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:28 | 102 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 29.675 The Boston Red Sox Note 675 of 977
RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "From Here To Eternity" 95 lines 2-OCT-1991 11:17
-< The End Is near... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STAGE: Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike. A long, king-of-the-road,
touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
domestic that dares to get in its way. It blares its horn at trucks,
which obediently get out of the way. State troopes look the other way,
knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
strange coolness sweep their body. Those foolhearty to stare at the
riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
"EXPRESS: FENWAY PARK"
It rampages steadily, always heading east. And folks in towns it
hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
The crescendo gets louder the close to Landsdowne street it gets. At
the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver. He looks
vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
pocket. A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
be seen through the windows.
Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing. The star is still warming
up - exercising her sizeable lungs. Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant. "Love Beantown,"
Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!"
"LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
apolyptic horseman. Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
"Throw the Ball! THrow the Ball! He can't score from FIRST!!!"
Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!" Their sons and
daughers cry "Jim WIlloughby!" and thier children spit up and wet
their beds, chanting 'Buckner, Buckner, Buckner'
A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
Beantown. In her mansion, the owner feels the prescense of her
husband, his mournful cries startling her - she glances at the calander
- OCTOBER - it sneers back at her. "She's back again, Tom" the old
lady trembles...
In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed. A dark cloud
obscures the stars. No animals move, rats and pigeons holed up until
the inevitable passes. The faithful file in, feeling strangely
germanic and lethargic. In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
collective grimace.
The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
take. The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn. The
road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.
Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918"
A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing - hey guys - those
spirits are going to try to stop us again - "Won't those poor souls
EVER learn!!!" A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the
name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue "Frazee"
The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor. The doors open. The
entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
through the legs of Bill. The star slowly steps down, with
a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
huge booming of drums cuts it off. The lights in the stadium dim. A
spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
the
FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
And to the tune of the "Hallejuh Chorus", she belts out this year's
rendition ....
"OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
From Bar Harbour to WInter Haven, Provincetown to Barrington, the faded
hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter. When the Fat
Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the heart of the
faithful. The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers of
despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top. The only
solance one can take is to peer down at the seats stuck just below -
the one's with those two guys from Chicago....
JD
|
29.980 | It's no joke, dan'l... it's a living nightmare... :-( | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:29 | 1 |
|
|
29.981 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 01 1992 15:37 | 18 |
| > <<< Note 29.979 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Anybody but the Dukies" >>>
> -< You talking about this, Saw? >-
>
> <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
> -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
>================================================================================
>Note 29.675 The Boston Red Sox Note 675 of 977
>RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "From Here To Eternity" 95 lines 2-OCT-1991 11:17
> -< The End Is near... >-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes!!!!
Now I can extract that baby and save it. That was priceless!!!!!
'Saw
|
29.982 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Wed Apr 01 1992 16:42 | 43 |
| OK, let's get serious about the Stanley, Gedman thing. I rag on tub-so
alot but let me try and get as objective as is possible for a guy who
has seen the film "Hunt for Red Sox in October" 43 times.
Rich Gedman had a heart as big as his girth. He also had little
catching experience as a catcher prior to the big leagues. His strength
was his arm. He was certainly not a cat behind the plate and, for his
size, had little power with the bat. His speed on the basepaths was not
what one would call legendary.
He had one year where he made the ALAS team and hit for average. That
was the year when he had some of his natural swing and a hint of a
Hriniak helicopter. The following years saw a total Hriniak style that
Gedman couldn't handle. He was built and designed for power and treated
like a Mark Belanger-type hitter.
My contention is that, in a tight game, a truly "good" (not great, just
good) catcher would be on his toes trying to block every pitch with
every inch of his body. Gedman lacked the A) experience, B) athletic
ability, C) smarts, D) All the above to arise to the situation.
As far as Bob Stanley goes, this man was asked to be a starter, long
reliever, closer, bullpen coach and beachball popper by the Sox. Never
complained, grabbed the ball and did his best. He was affectionatley
called Big Foot for years. From 1975 to 1985, he was the most
consistent, successful pitcher the Red Sox had. Let's not EVER forget
that. His best years were behind him in 1986 yet, as the season
started, he was expected to be the main closer. He gave it a shot and
failed. He was better suited, at that point in his career, to being a
middle reliever.
The problem with Game 6 was when MacNamara brought in Schiraldi so
soon. Stanley should have come in instead while Schiraldi was held for
the 9th inning.
As far as Schiraldi goes, let's not forget how he performed in the ACLS
against the Angels. National exposure didn't cause the guy to choke.
However, fatigue and mishandling by MacNamara, Gedman and whoever was
the pitching coach then, in my opinion, caused Calvin to run out of
gas in game 6.
Rich
|
29.983 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:01 | 3 |
| As soon as a saw Stanley headin' in from the bullpen, I knew the
game was blown! Really, I cain still remember it.
Denny
|
29.984 | S%$%^#%^& was *born* with fear in his eyes... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:01 | 11 |
|
> As far as Schiraldi goes, let's not forget how he performed in the ACLS
> against the Angels. National exposure didn't cause the guy to choke.
You mean when he came into that critical Game 4, the Sox trailing in
games 2-1 but up 3-0 in the ninth and looking good to knot things up,
gave up a few hits and then plunked a batter with the bases loaded to
force in the tying run, then lost the game in the tenth? ;-)
glenn
|
29.985 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:07 | 16 |
| C-c-c-can w-w-we change the s-s-subject.
I'm st-st-starting to flashb-b-back on a-a-a-all the old p-p-problems
I had in nine-nine-nine, uh, forget it, eighty six...
I've l-l-lost control of my b-b-bladder involunt-t-tarily again, and
now my skin is starting to f-f-flake, all in o-o-one day....
Pu-pu-pulease don't d-do this to m-me....
Doctor Inga, w-w-where are y-y-you?????
'S-'S-'Saw
|
29.986 | My B&^% is STILL MacNamara | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:13 | 29 |
| Unfortunately, certain players are remembered for only one or two
things in a career. Johnny Pesky never lived down the double hitch from
the 1946 WS as Enos Slaughter sped round the bases. Yet the man had an
incredible career and, concerning the play, it is seldom brought up
that Dominic had been replaced in CF and that the 2nd baseman did not
yell directions when Pesky had his back to the plate.
Ditto with Schriraldi, Glenn. I rememeber a classic confrontation
between Calvin and Brian Downing in the ALCS. Downing was totally
overmatched. But, at the same time, Schiraldi was being used up. The
kid had been called up from the minors in July, for heaven's sake and
led the team in Saves. Mac worked his tail off. And, in college, I
believe he was a starter.
Denny, you may have cringed when you saw Stanley coming in from the pen
in Game 6. I did, too. I know the guy didn't have it anymore. But,
there were many years I used to clinch my fist in a victory salute when
I saw the Bobster coming into a game.
Do people blame Yaz for making the last out in the '78 playoffs? Not
really. They blame Torrez for serving up the 'mater to (&%#$^&* Dent.
People knew Yaz had passed his prime and hoped for the best. Why
doesn't Stanley get this treatment? 'Cause he never had a bread named
after him? Cause "Stanley" sounds like a wimp name? 'Cause he was
overweight and ugly? 'Cause he couldn't run? Funny, but these traits
never caused negative reactions in the '75-'85 years.
Rich
|
29.987 | Straighten up 'Saw, it's good for you | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:32 | 21 |
|
In all seriousness, I have no problem whatsoever with Bob Stanley. He
had a fine career, and generally got a raw deal from the fans of
Boston. Yet I still hate to see the tendency to place the blame on
Rich Gedman to cover for Stanley's shortcomings later in his career,
including 1986. Gedman really did have an excellent postseason that
year, no matter what happened later.
S%^%^%&^%$ is a completely different story, though. We can queue up the
violins and pretend that McNamara and the Red Sox experience forever
ruined him, but rarely are things that simple in baseball. The guy has
pretty much been a stiff wherever he's gone, and he was just never cut
out for the pressure that a relief ace has to deal with. He did have a
great run in the last two months of the 1986 regular season, but I
suspect that that was all it was, a hot streak, too short to properly
evaluate or place in context. I agree that a deeper ballclub wouldn't
have had to rely on him to the ridiculous extent that the Sox did, time
after time in the postseason after repeated and notable failures...
glenn
|
29.988 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:35 | 10 |
| � Unfortunately, certain players are remembered for only one or two
� things in a career. Johnny Pesky never lived down the double hitch from
� the 1946 WS as Enos Slaughter sped round the bases. Yet the man had an
� incredible career and, concerning the play, it is seldom brought up
� that Dominic had been replaced in CF and that the 2nd baseman did not
� yell directions when Pesky had his back to the plate.
I'm pretty sure I read that film footage of the event didn't show any
hesitation on Pesky's part. I think this was in a recent issue of
"Diehard".
|
29.989 | | DECWET::METZGER | We'll always have Paris. | Wed Apr 01 1992 17:42 | 23 |
|
Actually as witnessed by Calvin's less than Stellar career post Red Sox I'm
surprised he did as well as he did. The man threw a flat fastball in the low
90's with little to no movement. He also had a tendency to throw the ball
around navel to chest high.
Toss in the fact that he was gassed from overwork and only had 1 pitch I'm
still amazed he got as far as he did.
The can should never have been the first pitcher out of the pen in game 7.
Oil can was always an extremely slow starter and had a tendency to get pounded
in the first 2 innings of a game. If he got out of them then he had a good
chance of going 6 strong innings. He never had the temperment to be a relief
pitcher. It would have been suicide to bring him into game 7 as a reliever.
The sox really lost it when they blew a 2-0 game lead going back to fenway and
the Mets won it when Sid Fernandez came out of the pen and totally shut the
sox down in long relief.
I couldn't watch the game last night....it's just too painful. Somethings are
better off forgotten.....
Metz
|
29.990 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Yeah, da Tew Yutes .... | Wed Apr 01 1992 21:15 | 19 |
| re Rich
We agree on one thing, The Can should have started game 7. He gives you
5 innings or so, and you're all set, because then Hurst can come in and
throw the last 4 at full speed. Yes, Boyd was hit hard in Game 2 - but
it was EARLY when it happened (what is forgotten is that he retired 19
of his last 20 batters, or something close to that) ....
Instead, what should have been obvious happened, Hurst ran out of gas,
and the Sox got hammered.
And I was rooting hard for Boston, because I couldn't stand the
arrogance of the Mets, Knight and Carter especially.
But McNamara was a joke as a manager, and nothing proved it more to me
than skipping The Can, and bringing in Al Nipper in Game 7.
I congraulated the Mets fans for winning the WS right there on the spot
- in the 7th inning.
|
29.991 | depends on your point of view | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 02 1992 04:52 | 8 |
| re: .964
Au contraire that game is ALWAYS a PLEASURE to watch, OVER and OVER and
OVER again as the ball goes through Buckner's legs and completes an
incredible comeback.
The Crazy Met
|
29.992 | In a more serious vein | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 02 1992 05:04 | 25 |
| Actually from a Mets fan perspective Wilson was not the player you
really wanted to see at bat in the 10th inning with 2 outs. He always
had a tendency to swing at bad pitches. Somehow he managed to connect
on those swings in that at bat.
If I recall Schiraldi had a pretty good season in 1986 didn;t he?
I have always wondered if a healthy Seaver would have put the Sox over
the top that year.
Oil Can was not the right choice for Game 7, Hurst was. Hurst had
pitched 2 phenomenal games already in the series. If you recall game 7
was rained out and therefore Hurst could pitch that game. Most of the
NY media wrote that the extra day certainly helped Boston because Hurst
and not Boyd would start that game. The Mets were not terrified of
Hurst like they were of Mike Scott in the NLCS but he was not their
first choice. If you want to blame anyone in game 7 blame McNamara.
Letting Hurst pitch to Hernandez made sense as a lefty-lefty match up.
But if I am the manager I have Clemens warming up for such a situation
and have him come in right after Hernandez's hit to try and blow away
the side for 1 inning. Its the last game, and Clemens could have easily
pitched one all out inning.
The Crazy Met
|
29.993 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:16 | 6 |
| For those of you who don't read the papers: The Red Sox may start the
season wearing their blue practice uniforms in road games. Their new
road uniforms were returned when it was found they didn't fit the
players properly.
John
|
29.994 | Or tight in the crotch? | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | In search of the lost chord. | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:42 | 5 |
|
What? Where the hats too small?
Steve
|
29.995 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:48 | 50 |
| Let's face it, only Red Sox fans (and, perhaps Cubs fans) continue to
rehash and replay "What almost happened" over and over.
Mac, I have seen the clip of the '46 Series countless times. Slaughter
was running on the pitch and Walker hit a shot into the CF-RF gap. I
can't recall who took DiMaggio's place in CF but the replacement lacked
Dom's speed and arm. Peskey positioned himself correctly in short CF
between the CF'er and home. As the ball was bouncing to him on 2 hops
from the CF'er, the 2nd baseman is looking at the play in the outfield.
Peskey catches the ball and, not knowing whether Slaughter is holding
at 3rd or coming home, turns and scans the field for a split second.
Noticing that Slaughter is 2 steps past 3rd at this moment, he then
reloads and pegs to home where his throw is late.
Peskey was lambasted by the Boston press for his hesitation. Yet, very
little is said of the decision to start Denny Galehouse in that
critical 7th game. Do the Sox ever change? Galehouse in '46, Waslewski
in '67, Burton in '75 and Nipper in '86. (Actually, Waslewski pitched
the 6th game in '67 to give Lonborg an extra day but, Lonborg was
burned out by that time. Since Santiago and Bell were not that
effective against the Cards, Williams tried something new).
I think Peskey was unfairly criticized by ignorant press types for the
play.
re Doc
I'm not so sure about starting Boyd in Game 7. (I don't recall, was
that in NY? I think it was) The Can had a load of talent but he was
also prone to being affected by outside distractions. And, Lord knows,
Shea Stadium had distractions. Perhaps, if he could have started and
done well in the first 3 innings, he would have cruised. He certainly
was well rested. The choice of Nipper, actually, was not a bad one. The
NL is a fast ball league and, junk ballers have had some success in
their first round through the league. But Nipper was NOT a premier junk
baller and his fast ball, so to speak, would get hammered at the AA
level. There was a chance, if Nipper was on, he could have frustrated
Mets free swingers enough to get them pressing and lunging. But, it was
typical Nipper....hammer time for the Mets.
The story of Dennis Boyd is interesting. He was mishandled and
mistreated in Boston. I think the same would have happened in Chicago,
New York or Philadelphia. I think the intense media attention adversely
affected a delicate personality. If the Can could have started in, say,
Kansas City, Seattle or San Diego, he might have been an annual
All-Star.
Rich
|
29.996 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Yeah, da Tew Yutes .... | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:04 | 23 |
| re .995
re Pesky : I was reading an issue of "The Show" (?), and the famous
'hesitation' was discussed. Apparently, none of the other players - on
either team - nor any of the press present, felt that Pesky did
anything wrong on the critical play. Somehow, someone entered 'Pesky
hesitated' into a story - and many people believe that Walker's hit was
a single (infact it was a legit 2B). Combined, Pesky was turned into a
undeserving goat.
Full credit should go Slaughter for hustle and speed, and a little to the
2B who didn't tell Pesky where to make his relay.
re The Can,
Interesting point Rich. Given Boyd's fine work his only full season in
Montreal (the anthesis of Boston and NYC - at least for baseball),
there may be merit to that. I really hope some team gives him a chance.
Right now, he's caught in a money trap ... :-(
Doc Oil Can
|
29.997 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:12 | 9 |
| Oil Can Boyd may very well have been (that's right, PAST TENSE) the
most overrated pitcher to put on a big league uniform!!! All mouth,
little substance!!! The Red Sox babysat him for years.....and IMHO he
wasn't worth their efforts!!!!!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.998 | | IAMOK::WASKOM | Goofy's Mom | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:25 | 7 |
| Cubs fans don't tend to replay key games like Red Sox fans do. (Trust
me, my first exposure to baseball was at Wrigley field. (-: )
However, the only reason they don't is because they so seldom get close
enough for it to count! They're much more numb to failure than y'all
here on the coast.
A&W
|
29.999 | The Can | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:43 | 33 |
| Nelly, I disagree. Dennis Boyd showed his skills in Boston too much for
someone to ignore. Sure he was a character. He said outrageous things.
He talked of being Satchel Paige reincarnated. He wore gold chains and
talked to himself.
But, when Hrabosky or Fidrych acted eccentric, it was charming. At the
same time, Hrabosky and Fidrych knew how to take advantage of their
strange antics. Boyd, on the other hand, was a naive kid thrust into
the limelight of a voracious sports town that looked to adore a star or
find a goat for continued failings.
When the Can first came up, his enthusiasm was cheered as a breath of
fresh air. Boyd was like a 12 year old kid being exposed to a childhood
icon. And the kid had a live arm.
He was "babied", as you say, because he had talent that needed to be
developed and properly channeled. I think the Sox learned from the
Rogelio Moret fiasco. They lost a great talent in that kid (as they
did in Bobby Sprowel, for that matter) and they didn't want to repeat
the same thing with the raw talent they saw in Boyd.
He never attained star status. But, an argument could be made that Boyd
deserved an All Star birth a couple of years where he was left off.
Supporters could make a good case that he was passed over due to his
penchant for speaking his mind. (Something Bob Knight is applauded
for).
I liked the Can. He made me nervous but his enthusiasm was infective
and a true departure to the typical malaise one becomes accustomed to
in Sox players.
Rich
|
29.1000 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:55 | 21 |
|
> Peskey was lambasted by the Boston press for his hesitation. Yet, very
> little is said of the decision to start Denny Galehouse in that
> critical 7th game.
I think you're confusing games, Rich. Denny Galehouse was the starting
pitcher (picked by Joe McCarthy over Mel Parnell) for the one-game
playoff in 1948, and was shelled. I don't know who pitched Game 7 in
1946, but I don't think he had a particularly bad game...
Pesky's hesitation is a thing of myth, for the most part. It's been
well-documented that the radio announcers at the game and the print
guys in their columns the next morning made no mention of it, as it was
oh-so-slight and might not have even made a difference. To this day
Pesky contends that he did nothing out of the ordinary on that play.
However, some bigwig-type columnist (might have been Red Smith, I'm not
sure) made note of it in a nationally syndicated column or something,
and then it was off to the races...
glenn
|
29.1001 | Way too late for the Can or anyone else... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 11:07 | 13 |
|
Oh yeah, and by the time Al Nipper came into 1986 Game 7, the game was
already over. He's the one that gave up the insurance home run to the
Straw, right? By that time S%^&^%^%@ had come into a tie game, given
up the game-winning homer to Ray Knight, put another man on, wild
pitched him to second (on a pitchout, for cripes sake!) and let him
score on another hit. Nipper was only out there because at the time it
wasn't clear whether the Sox bullpen was going to allow the game to
end...
glenn
|
29.1002 | Whoooops | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Apr 02 1992 11:48 | 17 |
| re <<< Note 29.1000 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>I think you're confusing games, Rich. Denny Galehouse was the starting
>pitcher (picked by Joe McCarthy over Mel Parnell) for the one-game
>playoff in 1948, and was shelled. I don't know who pitched Game 7 in
>1946, but I don't think he had a particularly bad game...
Damn, Glenn, ya got me. I just finished reading an SCD story on
Galehouse and should've known better.
I believe that Pesky DID suffer from what was percieved on that play. I
agree, it was not mentioned by radio or newspaper that day or the next
but the subject DID come up shortly after the Series and Pesky DID
become a goat, unfairly.
Rich
|
29.1003 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Thu Apr 02 1992 12:46 | 14 |
| Good to have you back Rich, I disagree with Santiago pitching
poorly against the Cardinals. He lost game one of the series 2-1
to Bob Gibson (and got the Sox only run with a homer). Possibly
because he did pitch in the first game it was to soon to bring him
back for game 6. And as far as Moret goes the guy never had a chance
no matter who he pitched for. He had an IQ of just over 70 and
no matter where he went management just looked at his ability to
pitch and not his inability to deal with the stress of a major league
ballplayer's life. The Sox were just as guilty as the other teams
he pitched for as far as neglecting an obvious problem, but they
didn't ruin his career. Gammons did a real good article about Moret
not long after his breakdown.
/Don
|
29.1004 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan is one year old today | Thu Apr 02 1992 12:47 | 6 |
| re the Can:
Did any team pick him up this spring, even to a triple-A contract?
py
|
29.1005 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Thu Apr 02 1992 13:45 | 8 |
| RE: 29.994 [RE: 29.993]
No, it wasn't that their hats were to small.
They returned the uniforms because their wallet pockets
were too small.
Scott
|
29.1006 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Apr 02 1992 14:30 | 24 |
| Hey Slasher - How ya doin?
Santiago had that one good game in #1 but showed nothing after that. It
was clear that the Sox were a 1 pitcher team - that pitcher being
Lonborg. The race for the pennant had sapped that staff.
As far as Moret goes, if I am not mistaken, he was 14-2 for the Sox one
year. Admittedly, he was no Rhodes scholar (but, since Clinton is one,
I'll wait for awhile before I call that a handicap) but he had a live
arm and a lot of potential. I'm not saying the Sox are the only team
that would have lacked the sensitivity to deal with him. But certainly
they didn't go out of their way to ease things for him.
I know, I know, a major leaguer must have the mental toughness to go
along with with physical talents. But this kid coulda been a contenda!
If the Sox would have shielded him from the media or made a few moves
to ease his anxiety, they may have had a heck of a pitcher who would
have matured slowly but surely. Who was the pitching coach then,
Jackson? Surely his minor league manager must have known his delicate
nature. Surley this should have been discussed with management prior to
his advancement.
Rich
|
29.1007 | Boyd not faultless, but the Sox pinned themselves in | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 14:44 | 23 |
|
I think the Sox were more negligent with Moret than Boyd. I don't
recall anyone ever lifting a finger to help Moret, who really had some
serious psychological problems. Boyd was, as his career record
indicates, just flat-out average. Yes, he had a couple of decent years,
but nothing that should have guaranteed him a spot on the All-Star team
(as if the Sox had any control over that in the first place). Stuff
like barging out of the clubhouse and quitting the team in the middle
of a pennant race because he wasn't selected for the All-Star team was
immature and irrational.
If anything, the Red Sox dealt with Boyd much too leniently because of
the heat generated by their abysmal record of developing minority
players. That's their own damn fault, and they've paid the price in a
number of ways (the Boyd saga being only a relatively minor one). By
contrast, even though Boyd pitched decently for them for a while, when
things got ugly in Montreal and the Can starting complaining about his
innings the Expos sent him packing pronto, with absolutely no one to
have to answer to. The obvious difference is that the Expos'
organization has always treated everyone the same way...
glenn
|
29.1008 | Boston Red Sox Player Salaries | SOFBAS::BELISLE | Mike Belisle MRO4-3/H9 297.3324 | Thu Apr 02 1992 15:00 | 20 |
|
Pitchers Tom Bolton 470,000 Infielders Wade Boggs 2,700,000
Roger Clemens 4,555,250 Scott Cooper 125,000
Danny Darwin 3,250,000 Tim Naehring 130,000
John Dopson 265,000 Jody Reed 1,600,000
Tony Fossas 350,000 Luis Rivera 1,075,000
Mike Gardnier 167,000 John Valentin 109,000
Greg Harris 1,400,000 Mo Vaughn 155,000
Joe Hesketh 1,775,000 Jack Clark 2,900,000
Peter Hoy 109,000
Jeff Reardon 2,633,334 Outfielders Tom Brunansky 2,700,000
Frank Viola 4,733,333 Ellis Burks 2,300,000
Matt Young 2,266,667 Mike Greenwell 3,050,000
Phil Plantier 185,000
Catchers John Marzano 350,000 Herm Winningham 450,000
Tony Pena 2,400,000
John Flaherty unsigned
1992 Team Payroll $42,203,584(4th in MLB)
Average Salary $ 1,507,271
|
29.1009 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Live long and perspire | Thu Apr 02 1992 17:03 | 7 |
|
Yowza! Imagine earning over $100k, say in the case of Hoy, and having
nowhere to go but up! I guess the old expression "getting invited up
for a cup of coffee" is one mighty fine cup of coffee.
Dickstah
|
29.1010 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Live long and perspire | Mon Apr 06 1992 09:42 | 32 |
|
Some predictions on this day before the opener against the damn
yankees:
-Sox will go no more than 10 games above .500, which will keep them in
the hunt, but not long enough or strong enough.
-Moe Vaughn will prove to be the second coming of Sam Horn, except
Sam had more power.
-Sox will draw over 2 million. Duh! This is guaranteed.
-Clemens/Viola combined records will be a disappointing 5 games above
.500.
-Sox will play their best ball in September, narrrowing the 1st place
gap from 10 to 4 games, only to play sub .500 ball the last two weeks
of the season.
-Tony Pena will be fooled by a changeup and lash a hit to left field.
Boggs will do likewise, and hit one to right.
-Sox will find out too late in the season that Valentin-Naehring is one
helluva SS-2B combo.
-First major flareup will be between Greenwell and Hobson, and will
occur before Memorial Day.
-I will watch all or parts of just about every game.
Dickstah
|
29.1011 | My predictions....... | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Mon Apr 06 1992 13:29 | 37 |
|
-Sox will win the American League East by 7 games
_Sox will win ALCS
-Sox will win World Series
-Boggs will win batting championship
-Plantier will be IMMENSE
-Burks will exceed career average in ALL categories
-Greenwell will hit .320 with 18 dingers, 110 RBI's (and will be 3rd on
the team in RBI's!!!)
-Clark, Darwin and Young will each exceed the expectations people had
for them last year!!!
-Matt Young will be voted TV38 Tenth Player Award winner
-Danny Darwin will be personally responsible for 3 bench-clearing
brawls!!
-Tim Naehring's back will withstand the rigors of a full season and
postseason.
-Wade Boggs will win a much-overdue Gold Glove.
-Tom Brunansky will be Mr. Clutch this year.
-Clemens will win 24, Viola will win 21 and Matt Young will win 17!!!
Nelly
|
29.1012 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 06 1992 13:32 | 73 |
|
>>-Sox will go no more than 10 games above .500, which will keep them in
>>the hunt, but not long enough or strong enough.
Given that the AL East has two teams fading fast (Tigers and Brewers)
and two teams bound to building (Indians and Yankees) it appears to me
that the Sox will be a co-fav with the Jays. However, I see the East
race being a 3 team affair with the Sox, Jays and Orioles. I see the
Sox doing a little better than 15 games over .500.
>>-Moe Vaughn will prove to be the second coming of Sam Horn, except
>>Sam had more power.
Funny you said this, Dickstah. I just told a friend of mine the same
thing. I think Mo will make the Sox realize how much they miss Carlos.
>>-Sox will draw over 2 million. Duh! This is guaranteed.
Agreed. But, what will the settlement of the Yawkey estate mean to the
team? I understand she left her interests to Harrington who intends to
sell that pending final settlement of Jean's estate.
>>-Clemens/Viola combined records will be a disappointing 5 games above
.500.
I disagree with this prognosis. Rojah will go 21-12 and Frankie will
start slow but end up at around 18-9. After that, though, they are
shakey. Hesketh will probably be out of the rotation by Memorial Day.
Last year was fluke for him. Young may win 10 but he will also lose 10.
I think using Darwin as a setup man for Reardon is smart. Darwin should
be able to take the place of Jeff Gray. Morten and Gardiner? Who knows?
>>-Sox will play their best ball in September, narrrowing the 1st place
>> gap from 10 to 4 games, only to play sub .500 ball the last two weeks
>> of the season.
I see them making the run in July and the first part of August, fading
into Labor Day and then churning it back up for a climatic end of
September battle with Toronto and Baltimore.
>>-Tony Pena will be fooled by a changeup and lash a hit to left field.
>> Boggs will do likewise, and hit one to right.
We will see alot more of John Marzano. Tony is losing it offensively
but one cannot minimize his leadership and ability to handle pitchers.
I think Boggs will hit .320 and play 130 games. The disparity between
his offense in Fenway and away will become even more apparent. He will
re-sign with Boston.
>>-Sox will find out too late in the season that Valentin-Naehring is one
>>helluva SS-2B combo.
I disagree. Naehring has yet to show he is a big leaguer. Magnificent
at AAA but who knows what he can do in the show. Would be nice to see
another Burleson (That's who he reminded me of when he played at
Pawtucket) but who knows. Valentin may be called up by July 4 if Luis
plays like Luis.
I also do not think Jody Reed should be tampered with. He is now one of
the best 2nd basemen in the game.
>>-First major flareup will be between Greenwell and Hobson, and will
>>occur before Memorial Day.
That's a pretty good bet. Other possibilities are Clark and Hobson,
Boggs and Hobson or Clemens and Hobson.
>>-I will watch all or parts of just about every game.
Wish I could say the same.
Rich
|
29.1013 | Book it | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Mon Apr 06 1992 15:49 | 4 |
| One Boston scribe noted that the Red Sox always win the World
Series the year after a Russian revolution.
/Don
|
29.1014 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 06 1992 15:54 | 2 |
| Looks like Nellie went out for lunch!
Denny 8^)
|
29.1015 | Not. | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Mon Apr 06 1992 15:57 | 13 |
| � One Boston scribe noted that the Red Sox always win the World
� Series the year after a Russian revolution.
Yeah, but they also blew it in '46, the year *after* a major world war
pitting most of the free world against a psychotic dictator's military
machine ended.
So, you gotta figure that Jody Reed will hesitate on his throw allowing
Ray Lankford to score the winning run from first in Game 7.
So much for that theory.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1016 | '86 sealed it fer me | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:36 | 12 |
| Well I look at it this way,
The Bosox are in a cabal with the other doomed teams ( Rangers,
Cubbies,etc.) Since this is/was the best chance that the Rangers
have of winning the Stanley Cup only to be striked out ( still
outstanding), then natcherly their bosom-soulmates, the RedFlops,
will go down in a choked-filled inferno. The year doesn't matter.
Destiny wins out.
MikeL
|
29.1017 | :^) | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:54 | 7 |
| I stand by my predictions and am offended by the suggestion that
alcohol consumption influenced my thoughts.....(HICK)......!!!!
Regards,
(HICK)Nelly
|
29.1018 | | FRETZ::HEISER | maranatha! | Mon Apr 06 1992 18:44 | 4 |
| > One Boston scribe noted that the Red Sox always win the World
> Series the year after a Russian revolution.
Yeah but the Communist revolution II won't occur until later this year.
|
29.1019 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:11 | 11 |
| re: .1001
Glen,
When Nipper came in the Red Sox had come form a 6-3 deficit to make it
6-5. They had the tying run at 2nd with no one out but Orosco shut them
down. The HR Nipper gave up was a huge blow to the Sox that late in a
one run ball game.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1020 | You should be renamed "The Thankful Met" 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:23 | 1 |
|
|
29.1021 | Hip hip hooray for Johnny Mac | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:27 | 6 |
| re: .1020
Yo, leave my name/handle alone :-)
The Crazy (ok ok and in that case Thankful) Met
|
29.1022 | | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:52 | 15 |
| Did anyone catch the piece about Carlton Fisk, entitled "Pudge"
on CBS Sunday Morning?
It was interesting to hear his thoughts about Boston and what they
did to him.
He said he felt violated, he said he has problems with getting TOO up for
the Boston games.
Have to hand it to this man. They talk of Nolan Ryan, but Pudge is also
an incredible player.....
'Saw
|
29.1023 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Tue Apr 07 1992 14:18 | 16 |
| Clark Booth did an interview with Fisk about 3 years ago and the
message was the same. He felt slighted that the Sox waited one extra
day to mail him his contract.
That was the bottom line, to me. Although I miss seeing the guy in a
Red Sox uniform I think his ego got the best of him. Sure, Pudge spoke
of some other piddly things but the bottom line was he felt he was too
important for the Sox to have mailed his contract 1 day late.
Why this hatred has lasted so long....I can't understand. I can
understand if he carried a grudge against Hayseed Sullivan or Don
Zimmer but I can't see how he can still hold such hatred for the whole
organization.
Rich
|
29.1024 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Intel Inside (tm) | Tue Apr 07 1992 15:21 | 4 |
| Vaughn and Plantier jacked taters in the 2nd against Sanderson. Sox
lead Yanks 2-1 after 4.5.
Mark.
|
29.1025 | parade in October | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles 162-0 | Tue Apr 07 1992 15:24 | 1 |
|
|
29.1026 | No parade in October! | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:42 | 4 |
| Yankmees win 4-3, Clemens gits the loss. HR's by Plantier ands Vaughn.
Fire Hobson and Gorman! Season's over!
|
29.1027 | GONG :-) | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles 162-0 | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:45 | 1 |
|
|
29.1028 | Heard on radio | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 08 1992 08:44 | 3 |
| Sox caint sell beer at Fenway for a couple weeks...
They lost the opener!
Denny
|
29.1029 | Wait'll next year... (-: | SHARE::DERRY | Matt 'Cy' Young | Wed Apr 08 1992 08:57 | 1 |
|
|
29.1030 | Stick a fork in 'em... | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPV | Wed Apr 08 1992 09:29 | 2 |
|
|
29.1031 | STIFFS! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | HELP! I'm having hockey withdrawl! | Wed Apr 08 1992 09:42 | 1 |
|
|
29.1032 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:18 | 18 |
| It doesn't bother me so much that they lost, as it does how they lost.
It looked like a continuation of last year. They left 8 men on base, they
got the lead-off man on 4 times the lasted 5 innings, they failed to move
the runners along, they failed to sacrifice when it seemed appropriate,
they failed to pinch-run for Pena late in game....etc.
I am certainly willing to give Hobson the time he needs to mold this team
into "his" team, but with all of this talk about, "being more aggressive",
I would at least like see some signs of it.
It's goning to be a long season,
I could use a good dose of hockey, to keep my mind off of the Sox til June,
Chap
|
29.1033 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:47 | 6 |
| �they failed to pinch-run for Pena late in game....etc.
I think the reason why became obvious this morning. Marzano was placed
on the DL today and Fletcher was called up from Pawtucket. With the
Sox only carrying 2 catchers on the roster, with one of them unable to
play, Hobson could not substitute for Pe�a.
|
29.1034 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:02 | 23 |
| < Note 29.1033 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >
�they failed to pinch-run for Pena late in game....etc.
� I think the reason why became obvious this morning. Marzano was placed
� on the DL today and Fletcher was called up from Pawtucket. With the
� Sox only carrying 2 catchers on the roster, with one of them unable to
� play, Hobson could not substitute for Pe�a.
I don't think it's so obvious Mac. I don't have a problem with
Flaherty coming into catch in the 9th. I mean you've got a chance to
tie the game, I would think you would pull out all stops, then take your
chances if you do tie it up. If they're not going to use Flahgerty, why
call him up ? If something happened to Flagherty, don't the Sox have an
emergency 3rd string catcher.
If they didn't want to run for Pena, I would of at least had him running on the
pitch, sort of a bunt, and run.
Oh well, I feel pretty good about Frankie V's chances tomorrow.
Chap
|
29.1035 | Petrocelli goes back, he's got it! There's pand.. | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:02 | 13 |
|
Need help with this one.
I've been frantically searching for a '67 Red Sox calendar kinda
like Denny's Sports Calendar. Thought it would be fun looking at
Red Sox history in '67 on a day by day basis since this is the
25th anniversary of The Impossible Dream. Anyone seen/heard of
such a calendar or advice on where to look. If'n I find it, I'd
be glad to post the daily events in here.
Danke,
MikeL
|
29.1036 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:05 | 8 |
| � I don't think it's so obvious Mac. I don't have a problem with
�Flaherty coming into catch in the 9th.
If I understood the announcement correctly, Flaherty was in Pawtucket
yesterday. He wasn't called up until today. The Sox do not have a 3rd
string catcher on the roster. Last year they only carried 2 catchers,
but Lyons was enough of a utility fielder that he could have filled in
if neccessary.
|
29.1037 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:11 | 7 |
| Flaherty was at home in New Jersey when Marzano was put on the DL
yesterday. Flaherty got caught in traffic and a normal 20 minute trip
took him over an hour. Given that he got to the game just as it was
beginning and so forth without much of a chance to adjust, Hobson was
reluctant to put him in.
John
|
29.1038 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:12 | 18 |
| < Note 29.1036 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >
� I don't think it's so obvious Mac. I don't have a problem with
�Flaherty coming into catch in the 9th.
> If I understood the announcement correctly, Flaherty was in Pawtucket
> yesterday. He wasn't called up until today. The Sox do not have a 3rd
> string catcher on the roster. Last year they only carried 2 catchers,
> but Lyons was enough of a utility fielder that he could have filled in
> if neccessary.
OK, that would make sense. I would have thought Marzano's condition
would have been known sooner, which would have enabled to the Sox to
bring him up earlier.
Chap
|
29.1039 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:47 | 5 |
| The guy called up was already there. Hobson said he didn't want to
put hin in for the bottom of the 9th pressure. Looks like he didn't
have to worry about that though huh? They never got to the bottom of
the 9th and Pena never got off of 1st base!
Denny
|
29.1040 | no pressure no problem | AD::HEATH | | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:03 | 4 |
| Yes, Flaretty (sp) was there and the poin about not putting him in the
bottom of the ninth pressure is a joke. No run no bottom, no problem!!
Jerry
|
29.1041 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:29 | 9 |
| Hey MikeL, if you ever find that '67 Sox Calendar check to see
if they have my favorite '67 Sox Moment, the day Tony Horton got
stuck between the tarpaulin and the wall in Cleveland trying to
chanse down a fly ball. I thought they were going to get a crane
to haul him out. My second favorite Sox Moment came when the Sox
and the Yankees had a beanball brawl and Rico Petrocelli knocked
off Joe Pepitone's wig.
/Don
|
29.1042 | That Boston team's really on the beam. Cuz we... | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:39 | 10 |
| /Don,
HAHAHA. I remember Horton between tha tarp and the wall. And Pepitone!
Thad Tillotson started it. Remember Reggie Smith picking up Tillotson
and slammin' him to the ground?
As mentioned before, my all-time favorite was seein' Tillman play
ricochet with Wyatt's haid!
MikeL
|
29.1043 | ....got Yaz! Pow! There it goes again! Carl Yast... | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:41 | 1 |
|
|
29.1044 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:46 | 4 |
| ...and remember when Williams benched Scott (who was batting
over .300) 'cuz he was to fat?
/Don
|
29.1045 | | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:46 | 9 |
| Scott...
Whatta rush. He just like to hit them "taters"....
8^)
'Saw
|
29.1046 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 08 1992 14:01 | 1 |
| ...he liked to eat 'em too!
|
29.1047 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Apr 09 1992 07:45 | 3 |
| And George was ALWAYS ready for an interview! The media loved him.
lEe
|
29.1048 | Ah, baseball. | SHARE::DERRY | Matt 'Cy' Young | Mon Apr 13 1992 07:50 | 8 |
| Wow. Whatta wacky weekend...
Young throws a no-hitter (the rules sip) *and* throws to first.
I admit that when they blew a 5 run lead on Saturday, I shut the
game off.
Clemens is GOD. Hi Mikey. (-:
|
29.1049 | Tribe bats can only get better | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | New grass on the field | Mon Apr 13 1992 09:15 | 6 |
|
Clemens always looks "all-world" against Cleveland..
If the Tribe could have bunted Saturday, they would have won that one.
/Jeff
|
29.1050 | Always a Hard Luck Guy | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 10:07 | 1 |
| Now Matt Young knows how Andy Hawkins feels.
|
29.1051 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Anybody but the Lakers | Mon Apr 13 1992 11:00 | 8 |
|
cmon now Karen you know Clemens, you know his ego meter was pegged to over-
load and ready to crash and burn under big game (ie opener 33k+ fans) pres-
sure so he took the easy way out and pitched in front of a thousand.....
Ditto what Jeff said....right Slash?
;^)
|
29.1052 | '67 | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 13 1992 11:56 | 17 |
| Well it's not a day to day calendar of the '67 Red Sox Impossible
Dream season, but I guess it'll do. Beginning today WEEI will be
running a daily segment called Impossible Dream Remembered. At
8:15 AM on weekdays and 9:15 on weekends, Ken Coleman,the voice of
the '67 Red Sox, does a one minute segment (taped of course) on
the Bosox' baseball events of that particular day in '67.
So for 4/13/67, the Red Sox go 1-0, Jim Lonborg is 1-0 as the Red
Sox beat the White Sox 5-4 in front of 8,243 customers at frigid
Fenway. SS Rico Petrocelli is the star as he gits HR #1 and knocks in
4 RBI. John Wyatt and Don McMahon relieve for Lonborg.
1-0!
MikeL
|
29.1053 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | But I never exhaled | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:25 | 6 |
|
Indians get 20 hits Saturday and lose. Two hits yesterday is enough
to split a double header. Funny game, this Bazeball.
Dickstah
|
29.1054 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | That's when I reach for my revolver | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:44 | 3 |
|
Another interesting little factoid given during yesterday's games was
that the Red Sox payroll is $42 million to Cleveland's $8 million.
|
29.1055 | NOT............. | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:56 | 4 |
|
Impossible Dream? What did the Sox win something that year of
NInetEEn hundad and sixseven.
|
29.1056 | down into the rathole | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:59 | 6 |
| Chappy,
Sox won a whole lot more in 1967 than the Yankees
The Crazy Met
|
29.1057 | ????????????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:04 | 8 |
|
Wheres the big ring...
Crazy Sox fan.....
Chap.....
|
29.1058 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:04 | 4 |
| Hobson should've had Reed bunting in the 9th inning of yesterday's
first game.
/Don
|
29.1059 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:14 | 3 |
| The Sox have not finished in last place in their division since 1932.
This is the longest such streak in baseball (and perhaps in all
sports).
|
29.1060 | out of loathing of the Yankees | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:15 | 7 |
| re: 1967
Sorry Chappy, but this guy don't give a hoot if the Sox won the WS or
not, they beat the Yankees making it in my eyes a good year for them.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1061 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Let's eat sushi and not pay | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:21 | 3 |
| I'd gladly trade a season or two in the basement for a Ring.
Mark.
|
29.1062 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:32 | 1 |
| I thought they tied for last in 1965.
|
29.1063 | I'd trade 74 years in the cellar for a ring... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:33 | 6 |
|
Who cares if they haven't been in the cellar since 1934. isn't
Cleveland in there Div? All I hear is 1967 impossible dream impossible
dream. Geez they didn't win it. Is 1981 the Yankee's impossible dream
because they almost beat the dodgers in 7. NO!
|
29.1064 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:59 | 25 |
| Maybe the Sox/Yankee Rivalry topic will rise again.
�All I hear is 1967 impossible dream impossible
� dream. Geez they didn't win it. Is 1981 the Yankee's impossible dream
� because they almost beat the dodgers in 7. NO!
On the off chance that you are trying to start a reasonable discussion
and not just baiting Red Sox fans, I'll try to help you out.
In 1967 the Red Sox were coming off a miserable season. In fact, they
had pretty much gone nowhere for the past 20 years. They had a new
coach and a bunch of kids. Dick Williams predicted that they'd win
more than they'd lose (which would be an improvement over the 1966
season). Very few believed him. That this team would even get to the
WS was indeed an Impossible Dream. They did get there and took the NL
champ to 7 games. The 1967 season marked a turning point of the Sox
franchise. Attendance has been steadily increasing (8000+ fans were in
Fenway for the home opener in '67, compare that with today's crowd),
they have been in 2 WS and 4(?) ALCS, and have been a perennial
contender.
� Who cares if they haven't been in the cellar since 1934. isn't
� Cleveland in there Div?
And so are the Yankees.
|
29.1065 | We're not last !!! We're not last !!! | SHALOT::HUNT | Ross Is My Hoss | Mon Apr 13 1992 14:22 | 7 |
| � The Sox have not finished in last place in their division since 1932.
� This is the longest such streak in baseball (and perhaps in all
� sports).
That's about as impressive as Snuffy's twelve straight Sweet Sixteens.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1066 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 14:26 | 34 |
| Well said, Mac - and I had no idea they haven't finished last since
'32.
I guess it's hard for folks who haven't lived with this franchise to
understand the deeper meaning of 1967 to us. They didn't see Dick
Stuart blow games with the glove and they weren't witness to Pinky
Higgins running the team. They were not here when Pumpsie Green and
Gene Conley jumped the team to fly to Israel. They have heard of Ted
Williams but, in reality, he was just about the only reason to go to
the ball park.
The mediocraty of the '53-'60 Red Sox compounded with the lethargic
uninspired play of the '61-'66 Sox led the Sox fans to expect more of
the same.
Yet, '67 was magic. Eddie Stankey called Yaz an All-Star from the neck
down. Nobody thought the Sox were for real. The Chisox, Twins and
Tigers all had more experienced, powerful teams - on paper. The Sox had
youngins like Foy and Scott and Jones and Andrews. Reggie Smith was the
opening day 2nd baseman. Mike Ryan and Russ Gibson - two very
forgettable players were the Sox catchers. It would be like the Indians
winning it this year. Yeah, there are a lot of young players who have
promise but they haven't been through a pennant race before.
So, let those who haven't had the excitement of '67 in their blood
laugh at us. It makes it all the more enjoyable to recall that
wonderful year.
BTW - Those who didn't live through it can't even begin to understand
how important it was for every Sox fan to do a perfect Yaz batting
stance.
Rich
|
29.1067 | something a Yankee fan will never understand | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 14:40 | 6 |
| To some extent those of us who rooted for the 1969 Mets know what it
must have felt like rooting for the 1967 Red Sox. In a somewhat similar
vein those who rooted for the 1991 Braves.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1068 | Don't categorize Yankee fans ............ | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 14:58 | 7 |
|
"Something a Yankee fan will never understand"
Untrue Yoseff. The Yanks too have had there doldrums. I
remember one year when we were down 14+ games on July 19th(my birthday)
and they were written off and came back to win the division and the
WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP.
|
29.1069 | ouch | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Let's eat sushi and not pay | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:02 | 1 |
|
|
29.1070 | Still not the same | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:08 | 13 |
| re: .1068
Chappy, sure the Yankees had a great comeback in 1978 but there is no
way you can compare that to the 1967 Red Sox, 1969 Mets, 1991 Braves.
The Yankees won the World Series in 1977, so their winning 100 games in
1978 and then the WS again was not a real great surprise. The surprise
would have been if they had not won the division (ala the 1987 Mets).
In the other 3 cases we're talking about teams that were way at the
bottom of their division or league one year and then went on to at
least win the pennant the following year.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1071 | Define Miracle - Spell It | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:34 | 19 |
| re Chappy
You just don't understand, freind. Your Yankees have won more world
championships than any other pro franchise in America. How can anyone,
other than totally self-indulgent gluttons, call any season in Yankee
history a miracle?
Your bought the Babe, you bought Reggie and Dave. You bought Don
Gullet. Expectations are always high. Yanks win? Who cares? Ho Hum.
Sorta like the Celtics or Lakers. They are expected to win. If the
Lakers are a lottery team this year and they win the whole thing next
year, would you call it the miracle of 1992-93? Of course not.
Long sufferers like fans of the NY Rangers, Cubs, Phillies, Red Wings,
Bullets, Patriots - these are teams - should they win a championship,
that would be a miracle.
Rich
|
29.1072 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:45 | 10 |
|
I'm not sayingit was a miracle in 78. It was a joke. If you were
a sox fan living in New York. Or a Celtic fan living in LA, you would
know my premise. I just get sick of hearing about the Impossible dream
or about 1975. When you finally do win it you'll know what I mean.
^
IF
|
29.1073 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:45 | 24 |
| Rich and Mac
You hit the nail on the head about the significance of the '67 Red Sox.
If I remember correctly, no one much suffered with the World Series
loss to the Cards. We were all astounded they were even there. '67
brings back the fun fun summer we all had watching the Sox.
I started attending Bosox games in the summer of '60 when my Dad took
this young 6 yr old to his first game. I saw a few games every year
from '60 to '66 ( anyone recall going in buses from their local Elks
clubs to sit in the right field grandstand?) and loved every minute
of it. The feeling of being in a pennant race and exhilirating in it
was sheer joy for most Red Sox fans. The team won its fans hearts back
in '67. It is just a special club to me, much more than any other
Red Sox team, World Series loss nonwithstanding.
The present day Red Sox angst surfaced after the
Aparicio-trip-rounding-third-73 Sox; choking-on-Oriole presuure-74 Sox;
Darrell Johnson-Jim Burton-cupcake-75 sox; and the
BFDent-Torrez-Gerbil-78 Sox. Redsoxangst was indelibly marked in Shea-
choked-86 Sox.
Nuff said,
67 rules
MikeL
|
29.1074 | What's next, you ran into a hot team? | SHALOT::MEDVID | New Dream Date Log | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:54 | 8 |
| Ahhhhhhh, 1967, the year of the Excellent Loss.
You sure the BoSox don't wear Carolina Blue jock straps?
And do you guys realize how funny you sound waxing poetic in Hare
Smithna fashion? Rollllllward!
--dan'l
|
29.1075 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:56 | 1 |
| ...so how bad are the Socks losing in the opener today?
|
29.1076 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:59 | 7 |
| Chappy, I too get sick of hearing about the Impossible Dream and stuff
like that, and I am not a Yankee fan or fan of any AL team. The point
is that being a Yankee fan there are certain things that you just can't
understand.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1077 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:59 | 7 |
| No way dan'l!
Big difference. Losses are never rationalized, (well in this case,
tolerated 8^) ). We strive for champeenships, thus the angst!
MikeL
|
29.1078 | go Birds! | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:02 | 8 |
| > ...so how bad are the Socks losing in the opener today?
5-3 Orioles after three innings.
There's a notesfile for game updates, LIME::SOX_UPDATES
py
|
29.1079 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:10 | 5 |
| The reason you are hearing so much about the Impossible Dream team
lately is because it happened 25 years ago. It's kind of like the
publicity around the 75th anniversary of the NHL.
If you don't like it, you can always go back to the Bronx...
|
29.1080 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:14 | 8 |
|
6-3 4TH INNING
Go O's...
If I didn't love the Yankee file so much I would quit my job
and move to the Bronx. :-)
|
29.1081 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Let's eat sushi and not pay | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:17 | 3 |
| Viola knocked out in the 5th.
Mark.
|
29.1082 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:24 | 38 |
| Cappy - I have never lived in Denver. For the life of me, I cannot
understand the fanatic support given to the Broncos. Read the Bronco
note to get a taste of this fan support. These guys, I guess, have more
suffering than Red Sox fans since we can at least say we HAVE won a
world championship.
Red Sox fans are cynics. Bronco fans tend to be optimists, IMO.
I have also felt that part of the strong feelings about the Sox have
their roots in Harry Frazee's selling of the Babe to the Yankees. When
Boston got the Babe back, he was washed up and in a Braves uniform.
I'll tell you, I spent August in Atlanta last year and it was magic.
Every play was diagnosed to death, every pitch disected. People were
happy to get stuck in a traffic jam if it meant having a few more
minutes to listen to the game.
Yankee fans may NEVER have this feeling. It's hard to explain. The Mets
had it in '69. They know.
As far as Excellent Losses, I find that accusation rather insulting.
Red Sox fans are the first to say that the best team won in the '67
Series, Zimmer blew it in '75 by feuding with Carbo and not leaving
Willoughby in to pitch, Zimmer blew it by keeping Hobson at 3rd base in
'78 down the stretch, MacNamara blew it in '85 by not replacing
Stapleton n the 9th.
Think about the above. Sox fans don't blame the other team or ump
calls. They look at their own team and analyze their
faults/shortcomings. You don't hear talk of favoritism, home field
advantage, being weary or playing with injuries. Those are cop outs and
those would be the alibis of Excellent Losers.
If you live in greater Boston, Capp, get used to it. It is a religion
and it is as much a fabric of life as the air you breathe.
Rich
|
29.1083 | Chappy and me in the same boat, oh no! :-) | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:33 | 9 |
| re: .1082
Replacing Stapleton in 1985??? Don;t you mean Buckner in 1986.
Otherwise a good explanation. But I am sure Chappy will agree that
despite all of that we don't have to like it.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1084 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:39 | 10 |
|
re .1083
>> Replacing Stapleton in 1985??? Don;t you mean Buckner in 1986.
Yeah, your right. Sorry 'bout that. You have no idea how hard it was
for me to omit my feelings on Rich Gedman that b*% Fa$ S@#b.
Rich
|
29.1085 | Grasp throat and squeeze tight now.... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:48 | 7 |
|
A met and a Yankee fan in the same boat nahhhh couldn't
happen. Even though the Mets from 85 to the present kind of remind me
of the early eighty yanks 81-83. all the talent and so little to show
for it.
|
29.1086 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:58 | 7 |
| I like taking over this note :-)
Chappy, wasn't Jackson gone by the 1982 season and didn't they lose
some other players around that time (Chambliss, etc.)
The Crazy Met
|
29.1087 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 13 1992 17:17 | 2 |
| Apparently Chappy is actually a closet Red Sox fan. He's been seen in
HECKLE::BASEBALL looking for updates of the score of today's game.
|
29.1088 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Mon Apr 13 1992 17:22 | 8 |
|
NOT.........
I just love hearing about the Sox losing. And I just LOVE
BASEBALL in general.....
|
29.1089 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Employees and Kevin Only! | Tue Apr 14 1992 09:18 | 8 |
| Mac -
Big Deal. They haven't finished on top of Baseball since 1918. Stats
like the one you put forward, IMO, are loser's stats. I'd rather have
9 years of last place ball and 1 year of a champeenship, then 10 years
of second place.
JD
|
29.1090 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:11 | 24 |
| re .1089
I don't know, JD. Can you imagine how hard it is to be an Indian fan?
Sure they won the Series in the 40's and came close in '54 but year in,
year out, they are at the bottom. Crowds are embarrasing. Seems every
year they are out of it by the All Star break. Ditto with the Atlanta
Braves until last year.
With the Sox they were respectable through the 40's and early 50's,
they had Ted Williams to showcase through their mediocre times in the
mid to late '50's. In the early '60's they were awful. The Indians of
their day. Since '67 they have had a shot at the pennant nearly every
year and kept the fans interested into September and, sometimes,
October.
What is so wrong with being one of the top teams for 25 straight years?
Sure, the championship will be nice when it comes but my team has gone
toe to toe with the best of them for a quarter century and at least I
know each year they have as good a chance as anyone.
BTW - Outside of K Griffey Jr, who ya have to root for in Seattle?
Rich
|
29.1091 | HAHAHAHAHAHA(tm) | SHALOT::MEDVID | New Dream Date Log | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:21 | 10 |
| > What is so wrong with being one of the top teams for 25 straight years?
> Sure, the championship will be nice when it comes but my team has gone
> toe to toe with the best of them for a quarter century and at least I
> know each year they have as good a chance as anyone.
Yet another quote from the Tarheel mantra collection. Keep it up,
guys. This is rollwardly funny.
--dan'l
|
29.1092 | Ix-nay the Tarhell connection | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:31 | 16 |
| I dunno Rich,
It's nice to be in a competetive position for 25 years, but I want
a dadgum CHAMPIONSHIP!!. THE HELL WITH ALMOST THERE!
You cain stop laughin' now dan'l, I've purged this discussion from
delving further into the Tarhell mantra. Your welcome.
MikeL
P.S. Maybe I'd rather be an Indian fan, that way I don't git the
ultimate tease. You can draw an analogy of the Red Sox fan sittin at
the front row of the strip joint, eyes a-ga-ga at Marina, knowin' it
cain never be, while the Indian fan sits a-chortlin' in a different
joint watching and cringin' at Roseanne Barr, but not givin' a damn.
HTH
|
29.1093 | wait til next year baby......... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:48 | 1 |
|
|
29.1094 | Yanks will sink like Titanic | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:54 | 7 |
| Jump on that Yankee bandwagon!
Patience. We'll see what the dog days of August hold for the Yanks.
In fact, go Yanks, beat dem Jays.
MikeL
|
29.1095 | Appreciate the moment... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Apr 14 1992 12:14 | 22 |
|
Not finishing last since the 1930s or whatever is not something to be
terribly proud of. Obviously there are a lot of circumstances involved
there that have nothing to do with the Red Sox. However, finishing
with a winning record in 23 or 24 of the last 25 years has got to be
worth something. At the very least, it means that if you're a Red Sox
fan and you buy a ticket before the season starts chances are you'll
see some decent baseball from the home team. Hey, anyone can be a
frontrunner and claim to be a big fan after the championship is won,
but at least the Red Sox give a reason to go out to the park and hold
out some hope, however slim, almost every year.
Anyone who compares Red Sox fans with Carolina fans either hasn't spent
enough time in New England or has completely missed the boat. For any
given rate of success short of a championship win, the Red Sox are the
least appreciated team in baseball, bar none (unless you consider having
something to gripe about a metric of appreciation, which some do).
According to the Boston radio talk shows and their call-in fans, the
1992 season is already over. It really has to be heard to be believed...
glenn
|
29.1096 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Goodbye Loooooiiieeeee! | Tue Apr 14 1992 12:17 | 29 |
| Rich -
My point of view stems, in part, to my personal competitive feelings.
It was 'nice' to be on a contending team - but once we one that first
champeenship - I knew what if felt like. There's no shame in giving one's
best and falling short. But nothing beats a champeenship. In the long run,
teams I ran for that finished 2nd are not much different than those that finished
4th. But the champeenship teams. Those live on in memory forever.
There's not much solance in being near the top every year. Sure, for a
team like Atlanta - last year was GREAT. But if for the next 3-4 years they
are competitive, but not champeens - it will be a disappointment.
It's kind of why folks (unnamed) criticize the NYMETS of athe last decade
of being underachievers, etc - yet they have a champeenship. As a Mets fan -
I can handle the 2nd places, the 1988 loss to the Dodgers - because of that
1986 champeenship.
I'm sure Twins fans don't mind a few bad years - if they win two world
champeenships in 5 years.
I think many Sox fans have become complacent - and perhaps that is a trend
that permeates the whole organization.
As a Sox fan, I find the 3 eastern champeenships in the last few years as
nice - but unfullfilling.
JD
|
29.1097 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Tue Apr 14 1992 12:33 | 7 |
| re Glenn - Nicely put.
re JD - Also nicely put. I can understand where your coming from much
better.
Rich
|
29.1098 | It's the end of the world as we know it | COBRA::BRYDIE | That's when I reach for my revolver | Wed Apr 15 1992 13:06 | 9 |
|
I read in this morning's Boston Globe that you can now buy Evian
water for two bucks a pop at Fenway's concession stands. I guess those
guys simulating the mattress mambo with the inflatable dolls build up
quite a thirst and nothing will slake it like a nice cold bottle of
yuppie water.
|
29.1099 | Think about it | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 15 1992 13:09 | 3 |
| "Evian" spelled backwards is ...
|
29.1100 | Dickstah's an asset, in case Donnie Wahlberg causes trouble again... | SASE::SZABO | Wewease Bawabbas! | Wed Apr 15 1992 13:47 | 9 |
| re: Evian at Fenway
Hey, that just might the solution to Dickstah's bladder control
problems. Instead of guzzling Fenway brews, he cain sip Evians!
Tell me, do they have complimentary lime wedges, or will Dickstah have
to bring his own?
Hawk :-)
|
29.1101 | Your ashtray = my urinal | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Treated like a king. Rodney King | Wed Apr 15 1992 14:04 | 12 |
|
How much Evian you gonna have stashed in the back of that #$%^box wagon
of yours in the parking lot, Hawk? I hear the parking lot attendants
(The Boyz in the Hood) can be bought off with with a six of the stuff
if you throw in some firm brie. (Watery brie gets yer tires slashed.)
I'll bring the stone-ground whole-wheat crackers and the paper
umbrullas for the cocktails. Do you prefer red or white wine for
the spritzers?
Dickstah
|
29.1102 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IBelieveReebokCommercialsSip | Thu Apr 23 1992 13:29 | 5 |
| The Brewhas cancelled the game 'cuz it was too cold? Main, if
beisboll keeps this up they're gonna catch up wif' soccer on the
testosterone chart.
/Don
|
29.1103 | Wimps | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:21 | 2 |
| I heard it was only in the 40s! That's baseball for ya!
Denny
|
29.1104 | Many :-)'s | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO... | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:33 | 28 |
|
The story I heard this morning was that Wade Boggs was the
man who had the game cancelled, aparently a old friend of his was in
the stands w/o any underwear on. ???? Just something I heard...
:-)
Chappy....
|
29.1105 | Go back to the Stankees notes file | WMOIS::FASSETT_E | | Thu Apr 23 1992 16:42 | 5 |
| Hey FauxChap- It was King George III that was in the stands with no
undies on, he wanted to see a real baseball team so he flew in to see
the Red Sox.
|
29.1106 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IBelieveReebokCommercialsSip | Thu Apr 23 1992 16:43 | 4 |
| If he wanted to see real baseball he should've taken in a National
League game.
/Don
|
29.1107 | ? ? ? ? ? ? | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Apr 30 1992 22:44 | 21 |
|
Right about now, the Bo'sox are 3 games behind the division (?)
leaders.
General consensus (how do you spell dad word anyhow?) is they are
playing terribly - mostly with no hitting. Naturally, the Manager,
one Bruce Hobsin is saying wait till it warm up and you'll see the
hits.
Do we have any body here who knows what kind of April history the
Bo'sox
usually have?
What's their (and Roger's too) dastistical performance been in Arril?
deen to wonk
I remain,
mebbey getting interested in baizeball,
Kev
|
29.1108 | | RUGBY1::way | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 09:05 | 20 |
| They're five back as of yesterday. Since I read the morning paper when
I got home from work (most days) and since we don't have a decent evening
paper (The Hartford Times went out of business years ago 8^( much to everyone's
dismay) my stats are only as good as yesterday morning.
I think Hobson is doing some wishful thinking.
In fact, I'm about to add Jack Clark to my "Most Useless Athletes of All
Time Club". At least that way John "Sweet Boy" Cullen will have some
company.
It's May now. I guess if we have a cooler than normal summer the Sox
will finish the season about 25 back, right?
'Saw
|
29.1109 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Fri May 01 1992 09:58 | 11 |
| The Sox (RED) will win the World Series this year!!! Hobson is
right...the hits will come....they'll go on a tear and leave everybody
eating their dust!!!!
I have it on good authority that the above WILL happen!!!
Heard This Here,
Nelly
|
29.1110 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 01 1992 10:32 | 9 |
| �In fact, I'm about to add Jack Clark to my "Most Useless Athletes of All
�Time Club". At least that way John "Sweet Boy" Cullen will have some
�company.
Clark always starts off slow. He'll come around.
�I think Hobson is doing some wishful thinking.
The Sox did score 12 runs in their last two games...
|
29.1111 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!! | Fri May 01 1992 10:41 | 9 |
| Hey Mac, thanks for your unbridled, continued optimism. 8^)
The prevailing sentiment right now in Boston is that the Sox are severely
limited due to lack of team speed. I think the truth is somwhere between
them being a .500 team, and them breezing to a divisional win. I don't know
their records, but my recallection is that they often start slow, and just
when you think they are out of it...
=Bob=
|
29.1112 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 10:43 | 7 |
| Toronto looks hard to catch.
One can only hope that, like a marathoner who bolts out of the gate with
a blistering pace, they will falter somewhere along the way.
'Saw
|
29.1113 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Fri May 01 1992 10:44 | 11 |
| Does Jack Clark have *ANY* hits yet? If he takes time getting started,
why don't the Sox send him down to Pawtucket to get it out of his
system? With the large # of LOB's the Sox have had, this guy is part of
the problem.
Read that Roger's ERA is about 1.5 yet he is 3-2. Leads league in SO's.
Sure hope the team starts hitting for him. Doesn't he usually have
about 10-11 wins by the AS break?
Rich
|
29.1114 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!! | Fri May 01 1992 10:46 | 3 |
| The LOBs are the bain of the Sox existance. NOBODY is hitting with men on base.
Such was the case lasted year too. I dunno what a manager can do about that.
|
29.1115 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri May 01 1992 11:01 | 5 |
| re:LOB
Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out! What an oaf!
Denny
|
29.1116 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 11:12 | 17 |
| > Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
> cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
> SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out! What an oaf!
That's a HABIT with him in pressure situations. I heard either Remy
or Monty talking about it earlier this season. With men on, and potential
scoring situations he ALWAYS swings at the first pitch.
That's curable too. If I were Butch, for the next month in those situations
I'd find him $100 for every time he swings at the first pitch. If he
does it and hits a homer, I'd fine him $200....
8^)
'Saw
|
29.1117 | | SASE::SZABO | | Fri May 01 1992 11:31 | 16 |
| > Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
> cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
> SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out! What an oaf!
I agree, that he's an oaf for swinging at the first pitch. But, what
should he have done in this situation, after taking the 1st pitch or 2?
In other words, should he be looking for the walk, especially since the
pitcher was wild, or should he be looking for a hit regardless? And,
if he should've been looking for the walk for the easy run and bases
loaded still, isn't this what Boggs has been critisized so much for
over the years (ie. no guts to go for the 2+ runs scored hit)?
Just wondering...
Hawk
|
29.1118 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 11:40 | 14 |
| Kwak,
See my earlier reply. With Greenwell, this is a problem. He swings at the
first pitch regardless of whether it's a good pitch or not.
One could accept it if the first pitch was borderline, but I've seen
him go golfing up there, with men on, and a low first pitch.
Obviously, you have to take the situation into account. Hobson should
be having the Gerbil giving him the take sign on the first pitch anyway,
if the pitcher has been wild...
'Saw
|
29.1119 | Too Much! | SHALOT::MEDVID | Who's got segmented eyes? | Fri May 01 1992 11:58 | 10 |
| RE: Greenwell swinging with bags loaded
Weren't you guys just last week getting on Boggs for looking for the
walk instead of swinging the bat to try to get the game winner? Said
he wasn't a team player if I do remember correctly.
BoSox fans can find fault in anything.
--dan'l
|
29.1120 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri May 01 1992 12:08 | 4 |
| What we're saying dan'l is Greenwell always swings at the first
pitch. Even if it's in the backstop. The pitcher was throwing nothing
but balls, but he's swingin' anyway.
Denny
|
29.1121 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Vanilla Trainwreck-What a Band! | Fri May 01 1992 12:08 | 10 |
|
No Dan-l and Kwah that was I finding fault with Boggs not the faithful. Big
difference....
;^) the smiling anti-
for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
sense less pressure in April....
mike
|
29.1122 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 12:09 | 16 |
| No, we're not complaining about Greenwell swinging.
Read my keystrokes 8^) :
Greenwell has a neurotic/phobic tendency, with men on base,
in scoring and/or pressure situations, to swing indiscriminantly
at the first pitch, whether it is hittable, or would plow the
guy with the orange wig behind home plate square in the forehaid.
I don't know 'bout anyone else in here, but that is what I'm griping about.
That behavior is not good baseball.
'Saw
|
29.1123 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 12:10 | 17 |
| > for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
> sense less pressure in April....
Mikey, Mikey, Mikey.....
April is the freshest month. His arm has come out of the hibernation over
the winter (where it only got exercised swinging at cops) and so his
"heat" is there.
From April onward, his arm will slowly get more and more tired.
For a pitcher like Clemens or Ryan, the season is like a marathon.....
'Saw
|
29.1124 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Vanilla Trainwreck-What a Band! | Fri May 01 1992 12:15 | 15 |
| > April is the freshest month. His arm has come out of the hibernation over
> the winter (where it only got exercised swinging at cops) and so his
> "heat" is there.
> From April onward, his arm will slowly get more and more tired.
Looks like Saw agrees with me that Clemens is nothing more than a thrower
of heat.
;^)
mikey
ps. Saw wasn't Clemens as hot as pistol last september until the big clutch
game to tie the Jays for the division lead?
|
29.1125 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Fri May 01 1992 12:21 | 17 |
| > Looks like Saw agrees with me that Clemens is nothing more than a thrower
> of heat.
Hey, Roger's obvious strength is his fastball. I think he's improved
as a pitcher over his career, but you have to remember you're talking
to a guy who couldn't pitch if his life depended on it.....
> ps. Saw wasn't Clemens as hot as pistol last september until the big clutch
> game to tie the Jays for the division lead?
You could be right. I honestly don't remember. He does have a history
of "Doing the Snuffy(tm)" in big games....
'Saw
|
29.1126 | One day, perhaps, Greenwell will surprise you | SHALOT::HUNT | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Fri May 01 1992 12:41 | 11 |
| I used to constantly bitch and moan about Garry Maddox's perpetual habit
of swinging at the very first pitch every single damn time he was up ...
Over and over again, stranding hundreds, no thousands, no millions of
Phillie baserunners at the very worst of possible times ...
... until the top of the 10th inning of Game 5 of the 1980 NLCS against
the Astros when he stroked the pennant winner up the middle on Joe
Sambito's very first pitch to him.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1127 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 01 1992 12:41 | 6 |
| �You could be right. I honestly don't remember. He does have a history
�>of "Doing the Snuffy(tm)" in big games....
This has been shown to be a myth many times. First becasue noone
really has a good definition of "big game", and second because his
stats show he is pretty consistent and are decent in post-season play.
|
29.1128 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri May 01 1992 12:50 | 6 |
| 'Sides, a REAL pitcher would lose almost every start, but be
unstoppable if his team somehow made it to the playoffs, right Mikie?
:*)
lEe
|
29.1129 | I axe again, only clearer, I thinks... | SASE::SZABO | | Fri May 01 1992 12:53 | 13 |
| You guys missed my point. I agree that it was stupid to swing at the
1st pitch. What I was wondering about, is what you guys felt he should
be doing in this situation, especially had he taken that 1st pitch.
Since the pitcher was wild, should Greenwell have gone for the walk and
a sure run with a bases-loaded situation for the next batter, or,
should he have been looking for a multiple-run hit (after taking a
pitch or 2, of course)? And, if it's the former, then how does this
differ from what Boggs has been highly critisized for?
Mikey "Voodoo" Childs need not reply.... :-)
Hawk
|
29.1130 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IBelieveReebokCommercialsSip | Fri May 01 1992 12:56 | 4 |
| Squak, it's very simple. Greenteeth should not swing at the
first pitch, but Boggs should. Got it?
/Don
|
29.1131 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri May 01 1992 13:10 | 7 |
| > <<< Note 29.1127 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
> This has been shown to be a myth many times. First becasue noone
> really has a good definition of "big game", and second because his
> stats show he is pretty consistent and are decent in post-season play.
I find this hard to believe. I cain't remember Clemens winning many
post season games. And I'm NOT a Clemmensbasher. Got any stats?
Denny
|
29.1132 | April & Sept = Clemens' best months... | MEIS::SIKES | | Fri May 01 1992 13:15 | 23 |
| Re:.1121
> for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
> sense less pressure in April....
I don't have last year's numbers handy, but Sept/Oct looks pretty good for
Clemens also.......
Clemens' career statistics through 1990.....
W - L ERA
Before All-Star break 65 - 30 3.11
After All-Star break 51 - 21 2.58
April 18 - 6 2.30
May 22 - 10 3.15
June 20 - 10 3.52
July 19 - 10 2.71
August 20 - 9 3.23
Sept/Oct 17 - 6 2.19
|
29.1133 | can't keep a good file down | CNTROL::CHILDS | Up thru the cracks, out thru da broken glass | Fri May 01 1992 13:45 | 4 |
|
Hahahahahaha the last twenty = BROKENRECORD.COM
;^) TGIF
|
29.1134 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 01 1992 13:46 | 7 |
| � I find this hard to believe. I cain't remember Clemens winning many
� post season games. And I'm NOT a Clemmensbasher. Got any stats?
Clemens does not have a lot of post season wins, but is pretty good in
the other categories which pitchers are measured by. I think somone
posted his post-season career stats in the Sox notesfile. If I find
them, I'll post them here.
|
29.1135 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IBelieveReebokCommercialsSip | Fri May 01 1992 13:51 | 4 |
| Mike Childs is secretly a Clemens lover. Matter of fack he
paid $200.00 for the limited edition poster of Roger and Wade.
/Don
|
29.1136 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 01 1992 13:57 | 86 |
| I couldn't find his post-season numbers, but here a are a copy of good
notes with some facts on Clemens:
<<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.690 Roger Clemens 690 of 767
NAC::G_WAUGAMAN 34 lines 18-MAR-1992 14:29
-< Clemens' shortcomings in postseason greatly exaggerated... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken, we've been through this many times before. Clemens' postseason
record is average, but it's not horrendous. People remember the bad
games and ignore the good ones. They forget the 1986 ALCS Game 4 where
Roger went 8+ and Schiraldi blew the game in dramatic fashion. They
forget the 1986 ALCS Game 7 win. They forget the strong, very winnable
1986 WS Game 6 (7 IP, 1 ER). They forget that even if he did give up
the stupid HR to Canseco in 1988 ALCS Game 2 that it was still another
quality start that was handed over to the bullpen to lose. They
remember the Cooney thumb but they forget that Clemens handed a 1-0
lead to the bullpen in a much more important Game 1 (the Sox weren't
down, 3 games to none) only to have the pen completely collapse once
again, not a week removed from Clemens coming off the deck after a
month's inactivity to shut Toronto down in a crucial last-weekend
divisional game (still one of the biggest thrills I've had at the
ballpark).
In eight postseason games, Clemens has had three poor outings
(counting the Cooney game), and five strong if not brilliant ones.
If credit could be granted solely on the basis of individual
performance, Clemens would be 5-3, which at .625 is not far from what
is expected from even the game's best pitchers (also keep in mind that
in each series, with the possible exception of California in 1986,
Clemens was up against the teams considered to have the finest offenses
in baseball). As it stands, he's won one game and lost two with 5
no-decisions, the no-decisions in particular due to absolutely
horrendous bullpen performances.
Again, if you want to see postseason mediocrity, take a look at Dwight
Gooden's record. Gooden is the consensus *second* greatest pitcher in
baseball over the span of the Clemens/Gooden careers.
glenn
<<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.753 Roger Clemens 753 of 767
ASABET::FREDRICKSON 34 lines 6-APR-1992 12:43
-< Note: quiz at bottom >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clemens appears on the cover of last week's USA TODAY BASEBALL
WEEKLY as "the dominant pitcher of his era."
They compare his numbers over the past six years (1986-91) to
the rest of the 10 winningest pitchers over that time, and no
one is really even close.
Clemens is 118-52 over this period, 14 more wins than second-place
Dave Stewart (who is 104-61). Only Dwight Gooden has a better
winning percentage (.695-.694), but he also has 27 fewer wins
(91-40). This sells Gooden short a little because I believe Doc's
best year was 1985; this comparison was obviously set up with
Clemens' parameters (his 24-4 '86) as the starting point.
Clemens has the best ERA (2.69, with no one else under 3), has
averaged 19.7 wins per year (no one else is over 17.3), and he's
got 350 more strikeouts over this period than runner-up Frank
Viola (Nolan Ryan is not on the list because he hasn't won
enough games during this period.)
The article also points out that Clemens is the first pitcher in
major-league history to strike out 200 or more and post a .600
winning percentage for six straight years.
Based on this data, the Sox now have baseball's two most
consistently strong starting pitchers over the last six years in
their rotation. While Viola is third over this period in wins
(103-74, one win behind Stewart), he has a better ERA than
Stewart (3.43 to 3.56) and more Ks (1106-964).
Just for fun, a little quiz (no fair if you have the data): Name
the 10 winningest pitchers from 1986-91 (I've given you four).
Mark
|
29.1137 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri May 01 1992 14:15 | 2 |
| Sounds pretty good to me Mac. Better than I thought.
Denny
|
29.1138 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Up thru the cracks, out thru da broken glass | Fri May 01 1992 16:15 | 6 |
|
looks to me like the only big win he got, he had to take a month off before
that to rest his arm and get it ready. Must have been from throwing to many
heaters in April...
the smiling anti
|
29.1139 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Tue May 05 1992 13:38 | 4 |
|
Does anyone know how the Red Soxs made out last night? Didn't Clemens pitch?
;^)
|
29.1140 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | PCs 'R Us | Tue May 05 1992 13:40 | 4 |
| Ignore Mike, he'll disappear during Roger's next regularly scheduled
gem.
Mark.
|
29.1141 | KBD, Don, Mac, etc... ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Tue May 05 1992 14:09 | 3 |
|
Mark, I never disappear unlike the choir of faithfuls I hear when Roger
does pitch one of those rare gems who can't be heard from today.....
|
29.1142 | If Rog got some run support.... | SHARE::DERRY | Matt 'Cy' Young | Wed May 06 1992 08:36 | 1 |
| Hey Mikey, take a pill buddy. (-:
|
29.1143 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 06 1992 12:21 | 6 |
| � Mark, I never disappear unlike the choir of faithfuls I hear when Roger
� does pitch one of those rare gems who can't be heard from today.....
I'll overlook this little inaccuracy (well maybe not - where were you
anyway after Rog won his 3rd Cy?), and just say that if this were true,
we would still disappear much less frequently.
|
29.1144 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Wed May 06 1992 13:59 | 15 |
|
> I'll overlook this little inaccuracy (well maybe not - where were you
> anyway after Rog won his 3rd Cy?), and just say that if this were true,
> we would still disappear much less frequently.
I believe I was in here pulling for one Jim Abbott to win it last year, no?
Sure you'd have to disappear much less frequently but given the roar I hear
in here the silence yesterday was deafing.
I've been knockdown by stats, called names and had a few other things hurled
my way in this little SDUC, I got to take my shots when I can...
TSA
|
29.1145 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IBelieveReebokCommercialsSip | Wed May 06 1992 15:44 | 4 |
| Secretly MikeC adores Roger and wants his son to grow up just
like him (i.e. RICH). 8^)
/Don
|
29.1146 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | PCs 'R Us | Thu May 07 1992 15:05 | 5 |
| Not really an update, but the Red Sox lead 4-0 in the first after Hough
and Alvarez walked 6 in a row after a Herb Winningham single. With Matt
Young pitching for the Red Sox, it could be a *long* afternoon.
Mark.
|
29.1147 | 6-6, end of the third | HBAHBA::HAAS | Future Man and the SynthAxe Drumitar | Thu May 07 1992 16:14 | 0 |
29.1148 | Typical ALmost baseball... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ARisingTideLiftsAllYachts | Thu May 07 1992 16:16 | 1 |
|
|
29.1149 | You just gotta laugh. | SHARE::DERRY | Matt 'Cy' Young | Fri May 08 1992 08:35 | 1 |
| time to change the p_name...
|
29.1150 | And I thought I was bad... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | EBFSGNCNBHPFFS! | Fri May 08 1992 08:57 | 8 |
|
HA HA!! I thought you were reaching a bit, just a tad mind you, in
da firsted place Karen! Matt 'Cy' Young, hardee har har! My mother
could make a throw from the mound to second base!
Steve
|
29.1151 | Rumor or fact? | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Fri May 08 1992 09:12 | 8 |
|
Just heard this news flash on the Radio..
The Sox have traded Jack Clark to L.A.
For 4 cops that can hit... ta-dum.
/Jeff
|
29.1152 | Sign her up | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!! | Fri May 08 1992 10:15 | 6 |
| Hey Digger
Is mom a righty or lefty? More importantly, can she move a runner over and hit
in the clutch?
=Bob=
|
29.1153 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Does the LAPD have a DH? | Fri May 08 1992 12:20 | 7 |
|
15 walks! That's *fifteen* free baserunners! A six run handicap given
to them and you'd think they could get a few hits and take advantage of
the situation, BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....
Dickstah
|
29.1154 | Maybe she could field for Young.. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | EBFSGNCNBHPFFS! | Fri May 08 1992 14:00 | 6 |
|
=Bob=, mom's a lefty, good arm, decent speed, no bat. 8^)
Steve
|
29.1155 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 11 1992 11:58 | 1 |
| What were you saying about Roger Clemens, Mike?
|
29.1156 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Mon May 11 1992 14:38 | 6 |
|
Hey Roger's always been able to beat the dregs of the leagues. Why do you
think he flew out to Cleveland earlier this year? You'll never see him
strike out 20 batters against a top flight team....
mike
|
29.1157 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Mon May 11 1992 14:50 | 19 |
| Mike,
We've never seen ANYONE strike out 20 batters on ANY team, other than
Clemens vs. the Mariners!!!
Just thought clarification was in order!!!!!!!!!!!!
Further, should Clemens be looked down upon for beating teams he should
beat?
Beating those that you should and going .500 vs. everyone else would
land even you in the Hall of Fame, Mike!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.1158 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 11 1992 15:07 | 5 |
| Mike, I thought only throwers had high K counts, while pitchers could
get outs in other ways. Kind of like Clemen's 4 Ks against the Royals
and 15 groundball outs.
That was Clemens' 31st career shutout.
|
29.1159 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Mon May 11 1992 15:12 | 7 |
|
Not necessarily Mac. Probably means he's lost speed so the hitters are able
to catch up with but he had good enough control to keep it low in the strike
zone resulting in ground balls. He was probably forced to keep low by a good
ump who wouldn't give him his legendary "gifted" high hard one....
|
29.1160 | | CAMONE::WAY | A&E - the World War II channel | Mon May 11 1992 15:42 | 14 |
| > Not necessarily Mac. Probably means he's lost speed so the hitters are able
> to catch up with but he had good enough control to keep it low in the strike
> zone resulting in ground balls. He was probably forced to keep low by a good
> ump who wouldn't give him his legendary "gifted" high hard one....
How 'bout he's just a REAL good pitcher that most teams would give their
left you-know-what to have on their team 8^)
hth,
'Saw
|
29.1161 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Mon May 11 1992 16:01 | 3 |
|
Can't argue with that Saw. Just have maintained he isn't great through
out this LDUC....
|
29.1162 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 11 1992 16:15 | 11 |
| � Not necessarily Mac. Probably means he's lost speed so the hitters are able
� to catch up with but he had good enough control to keep it low in the strike
� zone resulting in ground balls. He was probably forced to keep low by a good
� ump who wouldn't give him his legendary "gifted" high hard one....
Someone (McRae, Hobson?) was quoted as saying Clemens didn't have his
best stuff that day. As to the umpiring dig (still haven't given up on
that one, eh Mike?), his high hard one usually results in a swinging
strike, not a called one. Alot of good pitchers "climb the ladder".
And, the umps have expanded the strike zone a bit for everyone this
season.
|
29.1163 | shootin' fish in a barrel | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 11 1992 16:20 | 4 |
| � Can't argue with that Saw. Just have maintained he isn't great through
� out this LDUC....
Please define "great" and who you consider to be "great".
|
29.1164 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Mon May 11 1992 16:22 | 13 |
|
> Someone (McRae, Hobson?) was quoted as saying Clemens didn't have his
> best stuff that day. As to the umpiring dig (still haven't given up on
> that one, eh Mike?), his high hard one usually results in a swinging
> strike, not a called one. Alot of good pitchers "climb the ladder".
> And, the umps have expanded the strike zone a bit for everyone this
> season.
Don't know about the quote and obviously I don't care. As for the ump
dig what's a batter to do? If the first pitch is high and called a strike
you may as well swing instead of paying a six pack fine for going down not
swinging. Agreed pitchers climb the ladder. The last line says it all now
"everyone" not just his Highness is getting a bigger strike zone....
|
29.1165 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cities crumble, George does nothing | Mon May 11 1992 16:29 | 6 |
|
Not many great ones out there these days Mac. Viola, Morris and Hershier
are about the only ones I can think of. Great equals mixing stuff and
winning big ones....
mike
|
29.1166 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon May 11 1992 16:35 | 4 |
| Toss in Saberhagen to that mix.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1167 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon May 11 1992 16:51 | 2 |
| And Clemens has outperformed all of them. The only exception is in
post season play and that's because he didn't have the supporting cast.
|
29.1168 | HOGWASH | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon May 11 1992 17:03 | 12 |
| Clemens got shellacked pretty good in game 1 of the 1986 playoffs,
couldn't hold a lead in late game 2 of the 1988 playoffs, did ok but not
great in game 2 of the 1986 WS. Only game he pitched well and won was
game 7 of 1986 playoffs, and pitched well in game 6 of the 1986 WS.
I am not sure how much supporting cast really has to do with
post-season performance. Hershiser in 1988 had a worst supporting cast
then Clemens had in 1986 or 1988.
I think I got the years right.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1169 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon May 11 1992 17:20 | 5 |
| Red Sox notesfile reports that Mo Vaughn has been sent down to
Pawtucket (Mike Brumley was called up to take his place on the roster).
py
|
29.1170 | numbers...numbers....numbers..... | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue May 12 1992 09:41 | 9 |
|
Cain anybody tell me how Roger's ~1.32ERA compares to all the other
pitchers? I thought I heard that Nolan Ryan's era is somewhere around
32.x.
I remain,
chopping mo wood for da fire!,
Kev
|
29.1171 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue May 12 1992 10:19 | 12 |
|
Clemens 1.89
The two hottest pitchers in the AL, one getting no support...
Appier 1.40
Krueger 1.62
Ryan 8.59
Plunk 0.00 \
Wickander 0.00 -- couldn't resist
Power 0.93 /
|
29.1172 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | I am the margin of error. | Tue May 12 1992 12:57 | 1 |
| ROGUR HAS FEE SIGH YUNGS!!!!! HE AINT TWO BLAM !
|
29.1173 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Mon May 18 1992 17:45 | 17 |
| What's the consensus up North about Tony Pena? Has he reached a point
where his defense no longer cancels his offensive liabilities?
The reason I ask is that I recently caught thye PawSox in a series here
with the Braves (Richmond) and Eric Wedge looks like he is finally
living up to the potential he had coming out of Wichita St. He threw
out one of the fastest guys in the IL (Ramon Carabella) on a sweet
throw to 2nd, is hitting over .320, had 5 or 6 homers and a bunch of
RBI's. He took one of the Braves biggest pitching prospects, David
Nied, deep over the LF fence - a mammoth shot.
Also, sat next to, and spoke a lot to, Daryl Irvine's dad. Irvine had
two saves in the series and looked real sharp. Nice to see Rico wearing
his old #6 again.
Rich
|
29.1174 | A year away | SALES::THILL | | Mon May 18 1992 17:53 | 8 |
| I think they don't want to rush Wedge up to the bigs just yet. The plan
was for him to spend a whole year in AAA. They figure Pena can still do
it, but he's definitely slowing down. It might make a good trasition to
have them share the catching duties next year, with Wedge eventually
taking over once he's ready. Wedge can learn a lot about pitch
selection, how to handle the staff, etc. rom Pena.
Tom
|
29.1175 | Wedge - catcher of the future | CTHQ2::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!! | Mon May 18 1992 17:54 | 11 |
| re: Pena
Pena seems to have pretty much lost it at the plate - he can't seem to get
around anymore. He even seems to have lost a little in the throwing department,
even though it is tough to tell with the Sox inability to hold runners.
I think that there is a good chance that at the end of this year, when his
contract is up, the Sox will turn to Wedge as their #1 catcher. They seem to
want him to have a full year in Triple A before calling him up.
=Bob=
|
29.1176 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue May 19 1992 09:36 | 9 |
| The Globe hypothesized this past weekend that Pena would be gone at the
end of this season, probably to the Marlins, for promotional and PR
purposes among Miami's large Latino population. It's possible he may
get sent to a pennant contender at the end of this season if the Sox
are out of it but that's my own gut feeling. I feel their catchers of
the immediate future will be Wedge and Flaherty with Marzano probably
being the odd man out.
John
|
29.1177 | | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Red eye gravy and possum fat | Tue May 19 1992 12:49 | 4 |
| Although Pena hasn't many hits this year, most of them have resulted in
big runs.
Mark.
|
29.1178 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 19 1992 13:57 | 2 |
| Wedge wasn't able to beat out an injured Marzano and a non-name John
Flaherty in spring training. The time in Pawtucket will do him good.
|
29.1179 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Tue May 19 1992 15:27 | 11 |
| Thanks for the update, guys. I did see Wedge in AAA last year and he
looks much better this time around. He was very tentative with the bat
then. Now, he strides up, looking nasty and putting up some good
numbers.
Sad to see John Shelby hanging on with Pawtucket. He just doesn't have
it any more. And, for those of you who remember Wayne Housie from last
year, he is slumping big time.
Rich
|
29.1180 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | FIRST PLACE ORIOLES | Tue May 19 1992 15:58 | 15 |
| Question -- did Wedge appear in any games for the Red Sox in late
September last year?
If not, he'll likely spend all of 1992 at Pawtucket.
Reason: the expansion draft for the new Miami and Colorado NL teams
takes place at the end of this season. One of the expansion draft rules
states that any player who has appeared *in even one big league game*
can be selected if he's not protected. Minor leaguers who have never
played in a big league game and have less than three years professional
experience (four years if the player was under 18 when he signed)
aren't eligible to be taken in expansion.
py
|
29.1181 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue May 19 1992 16:16 | 13 |
|
> Question -- did Wedge appear in any games for the Red Sox in late
> September last year?
Yes, he did-- but it doesn't really matter, as Wedge was drafted out of
college in 1989 and is playing in his fourth season in the minors. I
expect that the Red Sox will protect Wedge and leave all their other
catchers unprotected. If they protect Pena and/or Marzano over Wedge,
they're making a big mistake. Wedge is the only catcher in the system
with any indication that he can hit even a lick...
glenn
|
29.1182 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Tue May 19 1992 16:21 | 4 |
| Bob Geren is also on the Pawtucket roster.........
Rich
|
29.1183 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu May 21 1992 13:31 | 5 |
| Why are the Red Sox so concerned about Mo Vaughn's friendship
with Jack Clark? Is Butch Hobson overreacting 'cuz he hung around
with a group of pothaids in the late 70's?
/Don
|
29.1184 | Much ado about nothing, imo | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu May 21 1992 13:50 | 24 |
|
> Why are the Red Sox so concerned about Mo Vaughn's friendship
> with Jack Clark? Is Butch Hobson overreacting 'cuz he hung around
> with a group of pothaids in the late 70's?
I've only heard very vague reference made to this friendship being a
problem, but I tend to think it's just media b.s. (that's mainly taken
on a life of its own under the guidance of one Eddie Andelman). I heard
an interview with Butch Hobson and he seemed to indicate that clubhouse
ties or behavior had nothing to do with Vaughn's demotion. On the other
hand, Hobson doesn't seem to want to come out of his shell yet and be
direct or straightforward about anything with the media.
I've grown very tired of Andelman's act on the Red Sox. He effectively
goaded and used Vaughn, who was in a delicate situation as it was with
his recent comments on his demotion, to promote his own cynical agenda.
Result: more bad press for Mo, even though he did nothing more than try
to explain himself in response to some very loaded questions. But not
to worry, if the Red Sox continue their recent improved play and move
into first place, Eddie'll bury the hatchet, claim again that he's
"just a fan", and all will be well again in the love affair with the Sox...
glenn
|
29.1185 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu May 21 1992 14:40 | 5 |
| Glenn, the comments about Vaughn's friendship with Clark being
a problem came from Mo's mouth himself. Not a newspaper quote,
but a teevee interview.
/Don
|
29.1186 | Mrs Clark? | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Thu May 21 1992 14:48 | 4 |
| So, I mean, who IS a friend of Jack Clark?
Rich
|
29.1187 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu May 21 1992 15:15 | 14 |
|
> Glenn, the comments about Vaughn's friendship with Clark being
> a problem came from Mo's mouth himself. Not a newspaper quote,
> but a teevee interview.
What'd he say? I missed that (that's what I meant by I'd only heard
vague references). Was he responding to what was reported in the
papers or what Butch told him directly? If the latter, I agree; that's
pretty low of Hobson. I mean, the Red Sox and some of the writers have
constantly been trying to tell us what a great guy and a leader Clark
is (seriously), so then they'd tell a rook to stay away?
glenn
|
29.1188 | Huh? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 21 1992 15:27 | 0 |
29.1189 | Score? | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 10:21 | 4 |
| How'd the Sox do vs the Angels lasted night?
Rich
|
29.1190 | Sox win | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 10:28 | 4 |
| � How'd the Sox do vs the Angels lasted night?
Sox win 4-1 behind 8 innings of 2-hit, 1-run ball from Roger Clemens.
Jeff Reardon pitched the ninth for his 11th save.
|
29.1191 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 11:12 | 4 |
| Thanks, Mac. How many saves is Reardon behind Fingers now?
Rich
|
29.1192 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 11:16 | 4 |
| � Thanks, Mac. How many saves is Reardon behind Fingers now?
3 I think. It looks like Hobson is giving him every opportunity to
catch him before Lee Smith does.
|
29.1193 | Lee's a favorite of mine... | SASE::SZABO | Dangerous neophyte technoweenie | Wed May 27 1992 11:24 | 6 |
| re: Lee Smith
Why cain't the Sox get guys like that? :-)
Hawk
|
29.1194 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed May 27 1992 11:59 | 8 |
| re .1192:
Lee Smith is still 11-12 career saves behind Reardon. Unless Reardon
gets injured or the Sox go on a horrendous losing streak, he should
pass Fingers first.
py
|
29.1195 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Wed May 27 1992 13:02 | 5 |
| Rich, Mike Greenwell finally got his first extra base hit of
the season (May 26th). Watching them hit and run the bases is a
great sleep aid (almost as good as the WLAF).
/Don
|
29.1196 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed May 27 1992 13:12 | 7 |
| > Mike Greenwell finally got his first extra base hit of the season (May
> 26th).
Now he's got as many as Dave Eiland. :-)
py
|
29.1197 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 13:17 | 5 |
| For Mike C. ~/~ :
Clemens is now 7-3, tied with Jack McDowell for the lead in wins.
He leads the league in ERA (1.65), innings, strikeouts, shutouts
and complete games.
|
29.1198 | was a nothin' game, tho Mac! 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed May 27 1992 13:25 | 1 |
|
|
29.1199 | Ojeda couldn't believe it | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Wed May 27 1992 13:37 | 8 |
| � Now he's got as many as Dave Eiland. :-)
AKA ... Dave "No Man Is An" Eiland.
I was watching ESPN when he hit that first at-bat dinger back in April.
"Shock" is the only word that came to everyone's mind.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1200 | | SASE::SZABO | Dangerous neophyte technoweenie | Wed May 27 1992 13:39 | 5 |
| Yabbut(tm), it's steel Spring, Mac. Roger's steel strong from the long
Winter's rest. Let's see how he's doing in August...
Hawk, for Mikey :-)
|
29.1201 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 13:49 | 2 |
| Apparently Greenie's extrabasehitless streak was through 98 ABs
stretching all the way to last September!
|
29.1202 | nothing more to add to those replies which say it all | CNTROL::CHILDS | "I'll get briefed up on that" hahahaaa | Wed May 27 1992 14:03 | 2 |
|
thanks guys ;^)
|
29.1203 | \ | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 14:59 | 27 |
| I read where Greenwell was on the DL for awhile. Is there a physical
problem with him?
re Clemens
Because he is outspoken, brash and confident, some folks will never
give him the respect he deserves as one of the finest pitchers of this
era.
Perhaps these same Clemens-bashers would have found fault with the
likes of Dizzy Dean, Joe DiMaggio (holdout), Ty Cobb and Leo Durocher
for some of the same reasons.
I either dislike a guy personally or like him. I either think a guy is
a bad ball player, a so-so ballplayer, a good ballplayer or a great
balplayer. Because I don't admire a guy's personality doesn't mean I
can't appreciate his stature as a pitcher.
If Clemens was not the talent he is, I don't think he would be as
outspoken (read: perceived rude) as he his. But he knows that, because
of his talent, his voice will be listened to so he speaks out when he
deems it necessary. I may not agree with what he has to say alot, I am
really ticked that he never answered a ltter from my microBrake, but I
respect what he does on the field.
Rich
|
29.1204 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed May 27 1992 15:16 | 10 |
| � I read where Greenwell was on the DL for awhile. Is there a physical
� problem with him?
Yep. His brain fell out while he was running the bases. Teammates picked it
up and put it back in, but forgot to reconnect it. He was on the DL while
learning to live without it.
Either that or it was his elbow and the monster cortisone shot he got.
j.
|
29.1205 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed May 27 1992 15:33 | 17 |
| You really shouldn't be pissed when a player doesn't answer his mail.
The volume of mail these guys get is sometimes beyond comprehension and
they need full time help just to keep up with it. I wouldn't be
surprised if Clemens gets over 100 letters a day. I don't think
anyone, no matter how rich and famous, should be expected to keep up
with that kind of volume.
I don't know how many fan letters even get read, due to volume and also
because a lot of them are folks asking for something.
I do know that in some cases the secretaries in a team's front office
know how to come close to writing a player's signature and they'll sign
the requests for autographs, so even if you do get an answer and an
autograph it isn't even necessarily from your hero, whoever that hero
is.
John
|
29.1206 | | CAMONE::WAY | Two Bullets and a Lady | Wed May 27 1992 15:42 | 15 |
| > I do know that in some cases the secretaries in a team's front office
> know how to come close to writing a player's signature and they'll sign
> the requests for autographs, so even if you do get an answer and an
> autograph it isn't even necessarily from your hero, whoever that hero
> is.
You mean my Will Carling could be a fake???????
Oh, how will I cope?
;^)
'Saw
|
29.1207 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed May 27 1992 15:53 | 9 |
| That's right, it could be. The collectibles business is full of scams.
Rich, I apologize if I came down hard on you for being ticked off at
Clemens. I wasn't trying to defend just Roger, but if an athlete did
everything the fans wanted him to, he'd have no time for a family life,
between answering fan mail, signing autographs and doing personal
appearances. Heck, he'd barely have time to practice or play.
John
|
29.1208 | I like the bad boy image... | SASE::SZABO | Dangerous neophyte technoweenie | Wed May 27 1992 16:05 | 11 |
| I hated Clemens years ago for his contract baloney, but have since
forgotten about it because of the commonplaceness of broken contracts
for more money in the wonderful world of professional sports business.
I actually like him now, not because I've forgiven his greediness, but
because I've taken a liking towards the bad boy types. And, I thought
Mikey C. was on the bad boy bandwagon too, which is why I don't
understaind why he don't like Roger like me and the Slasher. C'mon
Mikey, Roger Clemens ain't no Hulk Hogan! :-)
Hawk
|
29.1209 | | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm too sexy for this note ... | Wed May 27 1992 16:36 | 1 |
| Then you guys ought to idolize me .....
|
29.1210 | | CAMONE::WAY | Two Bullets and a Lady | Wed May 27 1992 16:37 | 11 |
| > Then you guys ought to idolize me .....
Doc, there's bad, and then there's BAD, and then there's bad attempts
at being bad.
I'll let the rest of the noters decide 8^) 8^) 8^)
'Saw
|
29.1211 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Angels redefine the term 'road trip' | Wed May 27 1992 16:43 | 3 |
|
Doc, Roger has at least one redeeming quality. Schools still out on
you...
|
29.1212 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 16:50 | 2 |
| I didn't think Roger broke any contract. I thought he just held out
when his contract expired until a new one to his liking was written up.
|
29.1213 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 17:36 | 24 |
| John - my miniBrake's letter was written back in January following an
appearance here in Richmond at a card show by Roger. To make a long
story short, the folks who put the show on ensured that we couldn't
even get a glimpse of Clemens unless we forked over $26. I know the
pressure pro athletes are under and I know the unscrupulous collectors
who take advantage of the goodwill exhibited by some players but it was
a really nice letter explaining how much the mini guy admired him and
was sorry he couldn't afford to "see" him. (Actually, MacroBrake was
too cheap).
I guess I kind of expected a reply since it was during the off-season
and I knew he wasn't due in spring training for about 4 weeks.
So, although irrational, I'll remain a bit ticked.
BTW - What a difference here in Tripple A land. The Richmond Braves
revel in coming out early to sighn autographs. Last year, miniBrake got
Keith Mitchell, Mark Wohlers, Brian Hunter and Cabrera's autographs.
R-Bravbe mgr Phil Niekro refused to come out, though. These guys get
such a kick out of the adulation afforded them by the kids. Just love
it.
Rich
|
29.1214 | | ROYALT::ASHE | You'll dance to anything... | Wed May 27 1992 17:52 | 3 |
| So if I send a card down to Leonard Russell to sign, what's the chance
that Ninj will sign it for him?
|
29.1215 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed May 27 1992 18:01 | 24 |
| Not much, since I'm no good at forging signatures and can barely write
my own. I take the 5th on whether someone else will sign it for him.
Rich, I don't blame you for not paying the money so microBrake could
meet Roger. If you write to the team during the off-season, it may be a
while before the athlete gets the mail. If you write to the athlete's
home, he's probably being flooded by mail there too. There are books
out for autograph collectors that give the off-season addresses of many
of the players to make it easier for these guys to get tracked down.
Athletes probably have bills and checks sent to their agents, have a
private PO Box for family and friends and I wouldn't be surprised if
they trash everything else that comes to their homes. Seriously. They
have to do something to protect what little privacy they have left and
probably would have to hire someone to help them keep up with their fan
mail if they chose to answer it.
Finally, as far as guys in the minors go, most of them probably will
never make the majors so they are enjoying the adulation while they're
getting it. Once they get to the majors and experience it, some of
them become jaded and I think to a certain extent it becomes more of a
pain than a pleasure after a while.
John
|
29.1216 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu May 28 1992 07:49 | 6 |
| What Ninj says is true. That's how I've had to handle it. I used to
reply to ALL autograph requests, but now I just trash most of them as I
just don't have the time. Afterall, I'd probably have to miss "Home
Improvement" and "Northern Exposure" if I tried to reply to all.
lEe
|
29.1217 | A new angle | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu May 28 1992 10:09 | 7 |
| HAHAHA lEe,
If ya signed it LT, mebbe some young'uns would think it's Lawrence
Taylor. Think of the dosh you could make!
8^)
MikeL
|
29.1218 | Sox win first 2 on dreaded West Coast trip | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 28 1992 10:14 | 4 |
| Reardon blew his first save of the season last night, but got the W
while Darwin got his second save as the Sox win in the 10th 4-3 on a
clutch RBI BB by Jack Clark ;^). Viola pitched fairly well only giving
up 2 runs on 2 solo HRs.
|
29.1219 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Thu May 28 1992 10:30 | 16 |
| Mac - thanks for posting the game results.
On autographs
I know that professional collectors have ruined the practice for the
kids. I recall going to a card shop in Vermont and Bob Feller was
there. We could get an autographed picture of him for $2.00. A guy went
in and dominated Feller for mover an hour by plunking down $200. A
couple years later, I saw this same guy at the big Shriners show in
Wilmington selling these autograped pics for $10.
BTW - Ninj, it's miniBrake. Bob Hunt has the (tm) on the micro prefix
for his brood.
Rich
|
29.1220 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu May 28 1992 11:50 | 4 |
| Vaughn and Hobson patched up their differences during a midnight
call last Saturday. Now I can sleep nights.
/Don
|
29.1221 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 28 1992 12:02 | 2 |
| What exactly happened when Vaughn was sent down anyway? I hear he's
not hitting in Pawtucket these days either.
|
29.1222 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 28 1992 12:04 | 20 |
| Well, here's some numbers that seem to blow away the "Roger's can't
pitch when it counts", "Roger's too burnt out in the second half", and
a few other of Mike C.'s "observations":
Clemens' career statistics through 1991.....
W - L IP ER ERA
Before All-Star break 76 - 35 1012.0 337 3.00
After All-Star break 58 - 26 772.1 228 2.66
April 22 - 6 255.0 58 2.05
May 25 - 12 339.2 122 3.23
June 22 - 13 297.0 109 3.30
July 21 - 12 321.2 99 2.77
August 23 - 11 312.1 109 3.14
Sept/Oct 21 - 8 258.2 68 2.37
W - L ERA G GS CG SHO IP HITS R ER BB K's
134-61 2.85 241 240 78 29 1784.1 1500 628 565 490 1665
|
29.1223 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu May 28 1992 12:10 | 6 |
| Vaugh said some things to the press BigMac after he was sent
down. Kind of hinted that his friendship with Jack The Whiffer/Walker
had something to do with his demotion. But now they've made up
and the Red Sox can continue on their merry way towards mediocrity.
/Don
|
29.1224 | Who's your idol? The DOCTOR.... | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu May 28 1992 13:05 | 6 |
| Mac thanks for the stats...take that Chili!
Doc I have to ask 8*) Exactly what sport should you be idolized for,
and how come the Cardinals keep forfeiting?
Jimbo
|
29.1225 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu May 28 1992 13:33 | 4 |
| Mac, I see the numbers you posted, but how many of those late-year wins
were BIG wins? :*)
Lee_for_Mike
|
29.1226 | "this is from your Uncle Roger"
| CNTROL::CHILDS | "I'll get briefed up on that" hahahaaa | Thu May 28 1992 14:23 | 13 |
|
Rat on LEe!!! He could easily be 8-1 in september when they were out of it
and 3-7 when the collar was tight in another year....How many times you going
to try and beat me over the haid with the same stats?
Here's one to get wooderize over Jimbo-0-0-fer....
in a poll published in sports taken of major league players 50% of those
interview said Clemens was the toughest pitcher in the Majors, 6% for Dave
Cone, Ryan, Saberhagen and I think Morris got 3% of the vote each....
at childs central rumor has that all players interviewed received 100 dollar
savings bonds in their kid's name.....
|
29.1227 | Did Boggs vote for Matt Young? | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu May 28 1992 14:25 | 1 |
|
|
29.1228 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | "I'll get briefed up on that" hahahaaa | Thu May 28 1992 14:30 | 8 |
|
Boggs vote for himself....He just a team player ML and the team needs him out
there everyday that's why he plays third. If he pitched he'd only be able to
help them out every 5 days. Then again this is the Almost League with the geek
so he could DH when he doesn't pitch. Geez wonder if he's approached Hobson
with the idea yet...
;^)
|
29.1229 | | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm too sexy for this note ... | Thu May 28 1992 14:48 | 9 |
| Jimbo, I should be idolized as a Bad Boy with a cause.
I could also be Patron Saint for Beleaguered, Physically Abused
Quarterbacks .... :-)
As fro the Cards, damned if I know. A lot of us were wondering the same
thing Tuesday.
Well, at least we had a great pickup hoops game at MRO .... :-(
|
29.1230 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Thu May 28 1992 14:53 | 8 |
| �< Note 29.1220 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers�" >
� Vaughn and Hobson patched up their differences during a midnight
� call last Saturday. Now I can sleep nights.
1-900-CALL-BUTCH for all of your Red Sox fantasies
|
29.1231 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 01 1992 16:22 | 1 |
| Is a game after a loss or losses considered a "Big Game"?
|
29.1232 | Seattle's a nothing team though... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Mon Jun 01 1992 16:51 | 1 |
|
|
29.1233 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Jun 01 1992 20:14 | 6 |
| � Is a game after a loss or losses considered a "Big Game"?
No, it's usually considered a game following one pitched by your worst pitcher
:-).
j.
|
29.1234 | took 2 outta 3 from the Sox though... | DECWET::METZGER | Ooohh, a sextet of ale... | Mon Jun 01 1992 21:00 | 3 |
|
Dave Fleming for Rookie of the year...
|
29.1235 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Tue Jun 02 1992 07:54 | 17 |
| Mac, any game that "Big Game Hunter" watches is the definition of a
"Big Game".
Actually, I was yanking MikeC's chain a bit. I've always felt that ANY
game prior to the pennant being clinched is a "Big Game". None of that
crap about late games being more important, they are all of equal
importance while the title is in contention.
I'd hate to imagine the hoopla that would have occurred had Clemens
spent all this time in NY. Yankmees or Muts, it wouldn't have
mattered, we would have been inundated with stories about him. Good
and bad, he would have received much more national press and media
exposure for any and all of his escapades.
If I was an owner, I'd want him on my team, period.
Lee
|
29.1236 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Downtown Saturday Night in Wilton | Tue Jun 02 1992 09:07 | 10 |
| Personally, I don't think the 'win after a loss' stat is that great.
big deal. Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
the ACE you are expected to win.
No, big games are played in October, not in the Kingdome at the end of
May.
JD
|
29.1237 | JD, is Gooden still better than Clemens? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Tue Jun 02 1992 09:11 | 1 |
|
|
29.1238 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jun 02 1992 09:21 | 2 |
| ...not to mention Greg Swindell!
Denny
|
29.1239 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Downtown Saturday Night in Wilton | Tue Jun 02 1992 09:34 | 11 |
| Slash
Clemens is better. But he's not the greatest to ever play the game, as
many would have you believe....
Lets see if he cain carry a team to a title - you know, like Orel H.
and frankie V. have...
Does he have the guts..
JD
|
29.1240 | | ROYALT::ASHE | You'll dance to anything... | Tue Jun 02 1992 13:43 | 1 |
| I think Lofton will get ALROTY before Fleming...
|
29.1241 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 02 1992 16:52 | 4 |
|
I don't think Fleming can maintain his pace for the entire season. I
think Lofton can. Lofton is definitely the favorite right now for
ALROTY.
|
29.1242 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:08 | 11 |
| re AL ROTY:
Pat Listach (Milwaukee SS hitting over .300 and among the AL leaders in
stolen bases) is right up there too.
It's definitely a deeper field than last year, where Chuck Knoblauch
almost won it by default.
py (who picked Lofton in the BASEBALL notesfile before the season
started)
|
29.1243 | | DECWET::METZGER | Ooohh, a sextet of ale... | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:22 | 11 |
|
Why don't you think Fleming can keep it up for the year? He's a control pitcher,
only pitches 7 or so innings per start and has been decreasing his pitch count
in almost every outing.
Do you think the hitters will figure him out in the 2nd half of the season or
are you predicting fatigue?
Metz_Very happy with the M's 1st round draft choice....
|
29.1244 | Still could be ALROY with respectable record, though | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:28 | 18 |
|
> Why don't you think Fleming can keep it up for the year? He's a control pitcher,
> only pitches 7 or so innings per start and has been decreasing his pitch count
> in almost every outing.
>
> Do you think the hitters will figure him out in the 2nd half of the season or
> are you predicting fatigue?
I think with neither of the above occurring it's unlikely that Fleming
can keep up the winning pace he's set to date. I know he shut the Sox
out the other night (no huge deal these days) and I don't know what his
stats look like right now, but at one point he was 5-1 with an ERA up
around 5.00. That tells me he has had the benefit of some run support
from a team that hasn't exactly been tearing it up offensively.
That'll likely even out...
glenn
|
29.1245 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:34 | 5 |
| �I know he shut the Sox
� out the other night (no huge deal these days)
I thought I heard that was the first time the Sox had been shutout all
season?
|
29.1246 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:39 | 5 |
| While it was the first time the Red Sox have been shut out, it's still
no big deal with the way they've been hitting and I'm surprised it
didn't happen sooner.
John
|
29.1247 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:39 | 14 |
|
>�I know he shut the Sox
>� out the other night (no huge deal these days)
> I thought I heard that was the first time the Sox had been shutout all
> season?
Well, yeah, but how many games have they scored only one or two runs?
Not to downplay Fleming's performance; it was a beaut, but the Sox'
offense has been close to if not the most impotent in the league so
far...
glenn
|
29.1248 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:42 | 6 |
| I found it interesting in light of their anemic offense. If they
aren't last in scoring in the AL, they are close. They lead the league
(if not the majors) in ERA, yet are still barely above .500.
Let's hope last night's 7 run outburst is a sign of things to come (and
the 10 runs allowed isn't).
|
29.1249 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 02 1992 17:57 | 7 |
|
Fleming is a control pitcher. He is 7-1. At the current pace, he'd
end up around 23-3. I don't see it happening. He has pitched well
lately, but his ratio is still pretty high.
|
29.1250 | not bad for a 23 year old rookie... | DECWET::METZGER | Ooohh, a sextet of ale... | Tue Jun 02 1992 20:22 | 16 |
|
Fleming's era of 4.xx or so as of a couple of games ago was the result of
2 bad outings. He's going to be a Mike Boddicker pitcher circa 1988 or so.
He's going to get you into the 7th inning most times without giving up too many
runs. He's also going to get shellacked a few times s year when he just doesn't
have it.
He'll never win an Era title but he'll win a lot of games for the M's....
BTW - I, also think that the Rookie for Cleveland will win the ROY if he can
keep up the current pace....
Metz
|
29.1251 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 03 1992 11:27 | 8 |
|
After a second look, I'd have to change my mind and go with that
Listach kid Paul mentioned for the moment. If you account for the
fewer games (and at-bats) he's played than Lofton to date, he's
even up there with him in SB, with a clear edge in BA, OBP, and SLG...
glenn
|
29.1252 | | MEIS::SIKES | | Thu Jun 04 1992 10:23 | 14 |
| re:.1236
> Personally, I don't think the 'win after a loss' stat is that great.
>
> big deal. Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
> The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
> the ACE you are expected to win.
Right, the chances of pitching after a loss are greater because you follow
the weakest starter in the rotation. But since you are the ACE, the
opposition usually has their #1 or #2 guy going against you, making winning
the game more difficult.
Bob
|
29.1253 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 04 1992 10:32 | 24 |
|
>> big deal. Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
>> The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
>> the ACE you are expected to win.
> Right, the chances of pitching after a loss are greater because you follow
> the weakest starter in the rotation. But since you are the ACE, the
> opposition usually has their #1 or #2 guy going against you, making winning
> the game more difficult.
What's amazing about Clemens' record after a loss is not his number of
wins, but his winning *percentage*. There's no reason that Clemens'
percentage should be any higher after a loss than a win (and it doesn't
matter who precedes him), but it is. As for the matchups versus
opponents, in this day and age of set, rigid rotations Clemens'
opposing pitcher is more or less random from game to game...
With that said, I still think the stat is somewhat overrated. Why is
breaking a losing streak more important than keeping a winning streak
going? A win is a win. I'm quite happy with Clemens' near .700 career
winning percentage over *all* starts, thank you...
glenn
|
29.1254 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 04 1992 11:40 | 5 |
|
At the beginning of the year, #1 starters face #1 starters. As the
year goes on, all teams have not played the same number of games, so
the rotations for all teams are not lined up and #1 is no longer facing
#1 all the time.
|
29.1255 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 08 1992 12:53 | 5 |
| Roger Clemens is named the pitcher of the month for May, a month in
which he went 5-1 with an ERA under 1. To celebrate, Roger pitched a
sub-Clemens game (he gave up 9 hits and walked a couple) in a 5-1
victory over Cleveland to become the first AL pitcher this season to
record 9 victories.
|
29.1256 | Important announcement! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:06 | 17 |
|
Clemens will probably next pitch against Toronto on Thursday. I'm
letting Mike Childs know in advance, as even in June this one qualifies
as a "big game", representing a 2-game swing in the standings coming
against the division co-leader. By the way, Clemens has not lost a
game in these "big" head-to-head matchups with Toronto since the middle
of 1988, going something like 8-0 in that stretch (although he did
pitch poorly in one of those games last season that he should have
lost).
If Clemens doesn't pitch on Thursday, it'll be because the Sox are
bringing him back in a pinch to go on three days' rest on Wednesday
against the other division co-leader, Baltimore. This one also
qualifies as a "big game".
glenn
|
29.1257 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If I were A....I'd | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:51 | 5 |
|
Thanks Glen but your "big game" standards and mine might differ. I find it
hard to get juiced up over a game when there's still what 100 games or so
left. While the Blew-J's are near the top their choke bone history is well
established having blown the division to Detroit a few years back.....
|
29.1258 | "Never let up, never give in!" -Mikey Childs, 6/8/92 :-) | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Mon Jun 08 1992 14:00 | 1 |
|
|
29.1259 | | JUNCO::GARRY | boston red sox in 92 | Mon Jun 08 1992 15:50 | 8 |
|
RE-1 Mike C
Mikes attitude might also be because his favorite pitcher Frank V is
not doing much so far and he was supposed to be Bostons ace in 92.
Tom
|
29.1260 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:25 | 6 |
|
Viola's pitched fairly well. He's not Roger and even Hesketh has
pitched better, but Viola's deserved better than his 5-4 record...
glenn
|
29.1261 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:46 | 3 |
| �but Viola's deserved better than his 5-4 record...
Case in point, Viola's loss to the Indians on Saturday.
|
29.1262 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:00 | 3 |
|
Viola faced a better pitcher in Nagy. That is why he lost.
|
29.1263 | Rog | SHARE::DERRY | Color Me Impressed... | Fri Jun 12 1992 07:21 | 2 |
| I know how many homers he gave up but how many k's did he get lasted
night?
|
29.1264 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Jun 12 1992 08:10 | 5 |
| ROCKET BLOWS ANOTHER BIG GAME! :*)
Hiya, Mikey!
lEe
|
29.1265 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jun 12 1992 09:06 | 3 |
| I think he struck out 7. He's given up FIVE HOMERS this season.
Whataya think Mike? Time to waive him!!?
Denny
|
29.1266 | Playing the role of Devil's advocate | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Fri Jun 12 1992 09:21 | 7 |
|
Two straight non-"Roger" type games.. remember he gave up a lot of
hits against the Tribe on Saturday. Could it be time for the
annual-mid-season-swoon-brought-on-by-mysterious-unnannounced-injury?
/Jeff
|
29.1267 | good Sox seats please | STRATA::FELDMAN | patriots in 92 | Fri Jun 12 1992 09:28 | 17 |
| Doug Feldman
strata::feldman
225:5224
I've watched allot of Red Sox games on TV and I've attend several
games but I never seem to get really good seats. I've always
wanted to sit behind the plate or around the Sox's dug out. I'm
looking to purchase 2 tickets in one of those 2 areas. so if
you have a couple of tickets you'd like to sell please reply by
mail with the location of the seats and the price and the date
of the game.
thanks
Doug
|
29.1268 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | It wasn't a big game anyways | Fri Jun 12 1992 10:11 | 4 |
|
Anyone know if the Yankees won last night?
;^)
|
29.1269 | I'll admit it, Clemens pitched poorly in a big game... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:18 | 18 |
|
> Two straight non-"Roger" type games.. remember he gave up a lot of
> hits against the Tribe on Saturday. Could it be time for the
> annual-mid-season-swoon-brought-on-by-mysterious-unnannounced-injury?
Ah yes, one of those "swoons" where Roger's ERA rises to 2.80 over a
stretch instead of 1.80. I was at the Indians' game. They had one big
hit and a bunch of harmless singles. Unlike what the Blue Jays did
last night, that's not a good formula for beating Clemens. I'm worried
about the Red Sox, but not Roger...
Well, Mike C. might not think so, but I still say that last night's game
was a very big one. Neither Clemens nor the bats came through.
They're in a hole to two teams now that I don't believe they can escape
from even if they do play as well as one can expect the rest of the way...
glenn
|
29.1270 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:19 | 3 |
| Sox will be no better than 82-80 this year.
John
|
29.1271 | Six, two, and even. Period | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:20 | 1 |
|
|
29.1272 | His ERA can't be 2.8 | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:56 | 15 |
|
RE: .1269
glenn, I was joking about the swoon, but maybe I'm not too far off...
Clemens usually dominates Cleveland, so I consider giving up 9 hits to
be a poor performance for him... besides, a few clutch Cleveland hits
in that game and he takes an early shower. The media said that game was a
non-Clemens type performance, and I think last nights effort falls into
the same catagory.
Time to start the Nagy/Clemens rivalry note?
/Jeff
|
29.1273 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:59 | 18 |
| � Clemens usually dominates Cleveland, so I consider giving up 9 hits to
� be a poor performance for him...
I don't think there is anyone who would disagree.
�besides, a few clutch Cleveland hits
� in that game and he takes an early shower.
To Clemens credit, he got tougher and nastier with men on base. Many
would say this is an indication of his prowess as a pitcher (right,
Mike?).
�The media said that game was a
� non-Clemens type performance, and I think last nights effort falls into
� the same catagory.
No disagreement there either. I think I heard that was only the 2nd or
3rd time in Clemens career he has given up 3 homers in a game.
|
29.1274 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | It wasn't a big game anyways | Fri Jun 12 1992 12:05 | 10 |
| > To Clemens credit, he got tougher and nastier with men on base. Many
> would say this is an indication of his prowess as a pitcher (right,
> Mike?).
no Mike would say it's a case of getting some extra help from the umps...
You know the old double wide, double high strike zone he's famous for...
but Mike's not here today...
;^)
|
29.1275 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 12:19 | 25 |
|
> Clemens usually dominates Cleveland, so I consider giving up 9 hits to
> be a poor performance for him...
I agree with you; the key words being "for him". That kind of outing,
unlike last night's, is still good enough for a win, though. Believe
it or not Roger Clemens has never been at the very top of the league in
opponents' batting average. He'll give up some hits, but his control
and ability to avoid the big extra-base hits usually carry him (again,
last night he had neither).
Clemens' ERA is still at 1.79. The 2.80 comment was in reference to
last year's run where he was indeed criticized for posting something
like a 3.30 ERA (well below average) over a ten-game stretch
conveniently located between the endpoints of his two bad starts on
the season (Texas and Toronto). Those kind of statistical games can
be played with anyone; bottom line result was still a league-leading
ERA on the season.
You can joke about mysterious arm troubles, but once again Clemens was
stupidly allowed to throw 131 pitches on a bad night in a lost cause.
No way any other manager in baseball allows his bread-and-butter go out
for the eighth inning like that...
glenn
|
29.1276 | 1.86 sounds better | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Fri Jun 12 1992 14:30 | 6 |
|
Glenn, you can't put all the BLAM on the manager for Roger's inning
totals.. many time he'll want to continue pitching, or pitch through
injuries without telling the manager.
/Jeff
|
29.1277 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Laugh while you can, Monkey-boy... | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:02 | 1 |
| Roger shouldn't be running the show...
|
29.1278 | You ask your players to give 100%, but don't abuse it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:24 | 13 |
|
> Roger shouldn't be running the show...
No, he shouldn't be, but if he is in this case it's not his fault. If
he's not hurt, and I don't think he is right now, he shouldn't have to
ask out of the game. It's the manager's job to exercise a little bit
of common sense in the use of his pitching resources. It shouldn't
even matter if Clemens feels good or not at the moment; given his
history at the end of seasons where he's pitched league-leading innings
totals, you err on the side of caution in a game that's a lost cause...
glenn
|
29.1279 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | It wasn't a big game anyways | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:12 | 4 |
|
yeah Glen that's true but where talking about a certified "head case" here.
pull Clemens when he doesn't want to be and he'll be asking for a trade in
the morning.....
|
29.1280 | I thought you said you gave up alcohol ;^) | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:19 | 1 |
| Where do you come up with this stuff, Mike.
|
29.1281 | Mikey, that's what makes Roger a bad guy. Doncha love it?! | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:25 | 1 |
|
|
29.1282 | he's looney toons for sure!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | It wasn't a big game anyways | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:33 | 11 |
|
of course I do Hawk... ;^) Wade's boring but Roger's a thrill a minute...
Mac, you telling me that in the heat of the pennant race that a stable minded
idividual of Roger's talents would be punching out doors in the manager's
office?
Speakin of ole Wade last time I looked he was batting down near the mendosa
line then I hear he's hit a couple of homers the last few games, I have to
wonder is Margo back in town???
mike
|
29.1283 | I love the guy; I really do... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:52 | 21 |
|
> yeah Glen that's true but where talking about a certified "head case" here.
> pull Clemens when he doesn't want to be and he'll be asking for a trade in
> the morning.....
You may be on to something, Mike, but that's what that 5-year contract
was for. You've got three years left to smooth things over...
Speaking of Roger's headstrong tendencies, any of you guys seen that
Reebok commercial on ESPN (I've asked others, but no one seems to have
seen it)? Roger's going through his insane workout paces, each routine
of which they ask what he's doing, to which he explains and then
angrily demands: "You got a problem with that?!" Crazy stuff like
punching his fist into a big bag of rice to strengthen his forearm
muscles... At the end he finally whiffs some pathetic excuse for an
actor trying to resemble a hitter and barks again, "You got a problem
with *that?*! Good!" Much better than the in-your-face commercials;
all it lacks is Terry Cooney...
glenn
|
29.1284 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:11 | 17 |
| � Mac, you telling me that in the heat of the pennant race that a stable minded
� idividual of Roger's talents would be punching out doors in the manager's
� office?
Jack Clark busted up a clubhouse bathroom in KC with a baseball bat
last season and proceeded to go on a tear. A St.Louis (? ex-Red Sox)
pitcher broke his hand by slamming it into a runway wall a couple of
seasons ago. Dave Steib throws baseballs into the stands. What does
all this mean? Absolutely nothing.
� Speakin of ole Wade last time I looked he was batting down near the mendosa
� line then I hear he's hit a couple of homers the last few games, I have to
� wonder is Margo back in town???
You haven't looked in a while. Wade's average has been steadily
climbing. He was recently awarded player of the week honors. His HRs
started coming after Butch dropped him to the #3 spot.
|
29.1285 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:31 | 18 |
| OK, Mike Childs, I'm going to ask you a serious question: What more do
you want from Roger Clemens? He is single-handedly keeping the Sox
alive this season. He is doing it without much run support and without
a great bullpen. He is doing it knowing he almost has to pitch a
shutout everytime out. He hasn't complained or bad-mouthed anybody all
season that I know of. He hasn't said anything stupid to the press.
You can't use the fact that he's not pitching when it really matters
because the Sox aren't going to play any games that really matter in
1992. They'll finish no better than 82-80 and probably won't even do
that well.
The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33. I'd
really like to know what it would take for him to satisfy you and
whether you'd be happier with him traded or sold somewhere else.
John
|
29.1286 | Goeorge's cousin? | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:36 | 3 |
| Mike doesn't like Roger 'cause he's from Texas and probably a
Republican!
Denny 8^)
|
29.1287 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:37 | 8 |
|
John, I think Mike C. has with maybe some slight serious reservations
here and there made it clear that he's a chain-yanker par excellence
when it comes to Clemens. At least I know I'm only having fun with
it...
glenn
|
29.1288 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Losing it from all the right places | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:37 | 13 |
|
>>The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
>>Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33. I'd
Hey Ninj,
Those are some pretty strong words, there. Love it, though. Sorta
gets you're point across!
JaKe
|
29.1289 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Pittsburgh Penguins, 1992 Stanley Cup Champions | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:38 | 9 |
| re: .1285
> The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
> Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33.
That is debatable. Now back to the Red Sox.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1290 | 4th Cy Young coming in 92...... | JUNCO::GARRY | boston red sox in 92 | Fri Jun 12 1992 17:42 | 13 |
| re -1
Good question John,I myself would like to hear Mike C say what it
takes from the Rocket to satisfy him........The guy has done everything
any major league pitcher can do,you can't blame him for not winning
a world series because it takes 9 guys to do that,if you could win a
world series one on one Clemens would probably have won 5 by now.
The guy is paid very well to pitch and he is the best there is in
baseball.Mike if he pitched for the A's in 88,89,90 I guarantee he
would've won 30 games each year because they were a complete team and
had it all,hitting,fielding and the best closer in baseball right now.
Tom
|
29.1291 | Childs comes clean film at 11:00 | CNTROL::CHILDS | It wasn't a big game anyways | Fri Jun 12 1992 18:36 | 21 |
|
Roger pleases me all the time I don't know what you guys are talking about.
He's always doing something out of the norm and has a rebel spirit which is
high on my list. Like JD and a countless other noters had problem with the
Bird Jihad, I have problems with the Roger Jihad. Before this year there were
guys who you could truthfully say pitched better than him. Now you really
can't. I'd still like to see him win a world series game though before I can
truly consider him to be the greatest ever. Even still power pitchers will
never rate high with me. I got a rag-arm so I like pitchers who throw junk.
As Glen so eloquently put it, I'm just a chain-yanker here because you
folks have gotten so bent out of shape over the years cause I refused to
kiss the guys feet. I wasn't even going to mention today's game but lo
and behold the first five messages in here where written to me so I had
to respond.
Mac a bat swung by Clark is a hell of a reach in comparision to Roger almost
damaging his hand in the middle of a race over a petty squabble with Morgan.
So Wade's average is coming up? Margo or Margo II must be in town....
mike
|
29.1292 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:18 | 8 |
| First, I apologize for throwing in the comparison to Jesus Christ.
While it made my point, it was uncalled for.
Second, Roger will never win a World Series game with the surrounding
cast he has. At the rate they're going, they won't win a divisional
title for the nexted few years.
John
|
29.1293 | Roger might not get another chance | SALES::THILL | | Mon Jun 15 1992 11:09 | 9 |
| Walter Johnson, who you could make a pretty good argument as the best
ever, only won one WS game. That was only because they brought him in
late in the game as a relief pitcher, which especially in those days, was
very rare.
Whether a pitcher even has the chance to win a WS game says more about
his team than the pitcher himself...
Tom
|
29.1294 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 15 1992 12:01 | 5 |
| Jeff Reardon tied Rollie Fingers all-time save mark with his
performance on Saturday against the Jays.
I think Lou Gorman should either try to get Joe Carter or pay some
National League team to make a trade for him.
|
29.1295 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Mon Jun 15 1992 13:37 | 5 |
| Mikey,
a rag arm? I thought you had a cannon!!! Those guys all
had world class speed on the bases.......8*)
Jimbo
|
29.1296 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:20 | 5 |
| Rag arm? Never heard that. We woulda called ya puss arm, Mikey!
8^)
MikeL
|
29.1297 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Don't go gently into that good night ... | Mon Jun 15 1992 17:13 | 5 |
| re .1293
Actually, Johnson won 1 game in the 1924 series (in relief) after
losing the first two. He then won Games 1 and Four in 1925, but lost
Game 7 ....
|
29.1298 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 16 1992 11:53 | 2 |
| Jeff Reardon broke Rollie Fingers' career save mark by notching #342
against the Yankees last night to preserve a 1-0 BoSox win.
|
29.1299 | | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Tue Jun 16 1992 11:59 | 7 |
| It was a great moment too.
And, when he took his cap off, he was the spittin' image of the Snide!
Hawk
|
29.1300 | | ROYALT::ASHE | They beat up Hulk, he might not make it | Tue Jun 16 1992 12:27 | 2 |
| And they lifted him on their shoulders to kiss his wife... oh sorry
Mac, didn't want to get mushy again...
|
29.1301 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Tue Jun 16 1992 13:25 | 4 |
| ...and Clemens stupidly doused him with Gatorade causing Reardon
to come down with pneumonia!
/Don
|
29.1302 | This one's for Dan | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Tue Jun 16 1992 13:59 | 6 |
| You know, Reardon probably never would have broken Fingers' record had
it not been for the park effect created by the new, improved Fenway
Park. ;-}
Rich
|
29.1303 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | How does Dan Quayle spell relief? | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:05 | 2 |
|
|
29.1304 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:15 | 8 |
| This just in...........
Jeff Reardon does NOT have pneumonia!!!!!!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.1305 | | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:19 | 9 |
| Danny boy spells it with an "E"
like in podatoe
;^)
Kev
|
29.1306 | Rog, you're the best, man... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:20 | 7 |
|
Still was nice seeing a me-first, non-team-player like Roger Clemens
willing to risk that precious right shoulder to put a teammate in the
spotlight, wasn't it? ;-)
glenn
|
29.1307 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Morrou for President | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:37 | 2 |
|
Glen, I think you got Rog and Boggs confused...
|
29.1308 | park effects fer shure | LUNER::BROOKS | Don't go gently into that good night ... | Tue Jun 16 1992 15:39 | 3 |
| re .1302
You took the words away from me Rich ! Haa !
|
29.1309 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Celebrate with loot and lyre | Wed Jun 17 1992 10:18 | 13 |
|
Jeff Rearend, coming off a glorious performance the night before,
failed miserably in saving a well-deserved win for Roger lasted night.
Coming in in the ninth with a 2-1 lead, he promptly surrendered the
go-ahead runs as the Damn Yankees went up 3-2. Plantier homered in
the bottom of the ninth for the tie, and the Sox won it in the 10th.
Now, if the Sox had scored two in the bottom of the ninth, Roger's
gutty performance would have been a no-decision and Rearend's miserable
show would have given him a win, n'est pas?
Dickstah
|
29.1310 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jun 17 1992 10:24 | 14 |
| That's exactly right, Dickstah. Bob Stanley was famous for blowing
saves in the 9th inning and having the Sox win in the bottom of the
9th, which is why he was known as the Vulture.
Games like last night had an important role in the invention and
evolution of the save rule as well. In 1959, Roy Face had a 18-1
record as a relief pitcher for the Pirates. Jerome Holtzman, noted
Chicago sportswriter, did some research on Face and found that in most
cases he was coming in, blowing leads and then getting the win when the
Pirates came back to win. Holtzman felt Face really wasn't being very
effective and a more accurate measure of a pitcher's effectiveness was
needed, hence, the save.
John
|
29.1311 | Maybe Clemens wanted to toss him into the crowd the other night | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 17 1992 10:36 | 24 |
|
> Games like last night had an important role in the invention and
> evolution of the save rule as well. In 1959, Roy Face had a 18-1
> record as a relief pitcher for the Pirates. Jerome Holtzman, noted
> Chicago sportswriter, did some research on Face and found that in most
> cases he was coming in, blowing leads and then getting the win when the
> Pirates came back to win. Holtzman felt Face really wasn't being very
> effective and a more accurate measure of a pitcher's effectiveness was
> needed, hence, the save.
But at least Face was blowing those leads over 3-4 inning outings, not
these 2-3 batter jobs. His overall pitching record (ERA, etc.) was
actually quite good and he was effective that season, bogus save rules
notwithstanding...
Jeff Rearend? Ouch. The simple fact of it is that Reardon blew the
game because I was there last night. I swear, I've seen half the guy's
blown saves while with Boston in person, and probably half of those
with a Clemens' win on the line. I think I saw a graphic on ESPN this
morning that showed that 4 of Reardon's last 6 blown saves over the
past two years have come at Clemens' expense.
glenn
|
29.1312 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 17 1992 10:41 | 7 |
| � Jeff Rearend, coming off a glorious performance the night before,
� failed miserably in saving a well-deserved win for Roger lasted night.
C'mon Dickstah. You should know this wasn't Reardon's fault, it was
Clemens' fault. He shoulda pitched the whole nine innings to show that
he is truly a great pitcher. And shame on him for coming down with the
flu...
|
29.1313 | Mac, a convert? ;^) I like his style... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Wed Jun 17 1992 11:41 | 0 |
29.1314 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Celebrate with loot and lyre | Wed Jun 17 1992 11:54 | 8 |
|
It's a shame that Roger doesn't have the win/loss record to match
the rest of his stats, and this game is an example why---blown saves
and lack of run support. Sure Roger can have a bad day and come away
with a 9-7 win, but it ain't happened yet this year.
Dickstah
|
29.1315 | Way to hustle Wade | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jun 17 1992 12:38 | 10 |
| Hey Glenn,
Since you was there. What didya think of Boggs no-hustle in the third.
He dogged it to second on the Clark DP. Sheeit if he hustled a bit
and slid he woulda beat the throw easily. And the replay was
convincingly damning. As he sheepishly ran to the dugout faster than
he did to second. Hobson shoulda leather-lunged him. And Monty
trying to rationalize his "gaffe".
MikeL
|
29.1316 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 17 1992 12:54 | 11 |
|
> Since you was there. What didya think of Boggs no-hustle in the third.
An absolute disgrace, an insult to the national pastime...
Boggs might have been forced at second even with the hit-and-run on; I
don't know, but at the very least Gallego should have been buried
somewhere out in short left field...
glenn
|
29.1317 | I really DID think this at the time... | SALES::THILL | | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:20 | 8 |
| Why is it a LAW that the closer MUST pitch the 9th? I know it sounds
like second-guessing, but Harris pitched the 8th and was effective, so
why not keep him out there and give Rearend a rest?
Also, why didn't Hobson pinch-hit (Bruno?) for Pena in the 9th with
Burks on 2nd and 1 out?
Tom
|
29.1318 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | P-O-T-A-T-O-E ? | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:36 | 12 |
| Tom, that stuff about the closer is in the rule book.
Page 666
Paragraph A
Subparagraph 3
Section 1.6.9
"A closer must pitch the 9th inning of a one run game or forfeit
the title of said closer..."
|
29.1319 | Pena's better than Flaherty, but c'mon, play to win... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 17 1992 14:09 | 9 |
|
> Also, why didn't Hobson pinch-hit (Bruno?) for Pena in the 9th with
> Burks on 2nd and 1 out?
Skeered to use his backup catcher in these kind of close late-game
situations if the pinch-hitter doesn't come through (I'm serious).
glenn
|
29.1320 | On the roster all year, played only the last game | SALES::THILL | | Wed Jun 17 1992 14:16 | 4 |
| If Flahrety is that bad, he shouldn't be on the roster, especailly
considering Pena's age. Flahrety is clearly the backup, but c'mon, he
could give them a couple of decent innings. It's not as if he's Roger
LaFrancios....
|
29.1321 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Celebrate with loot and lyre | Wed Jun 17 1992 17:11 | 14 |
|
And how 'bout Pena allowing the runner on second to tag up and go to
third on a pop-foul behind the plate?
And how 'bout Greenwell (before he threw a guy out from the corner)
chasing a ball into the corner and, conceding the double, casually
picked up the ball without even glancing around at the runner? The
runner *could* have fallen down, or he *could* have stupidly tried
for third, but Greenie must have seen the ball land, said "Well, that's
a double". End of play. Maybe he did get yelled at and that's why he
hustled on the next one.
Dickstah
|
29.1322 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 17 1992 17:32 | 9 |
| Wow, if Dickstah's getting on the Sox the Boston fandom must be really
irate these days.
� And how 'bout Pena allowing the runner on second to tag up and go to
� third on a pop-foul behind the plate?
In defense of Tony, he did collide with Cooper on that play. It wasn't
serious, but enough to cause the hesitation which a heads-up Yankee
baserunner took advantage of.
|
29.1323 | A win is a win | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Thu Jun 18 1992 08:56 | 7 |
|
All this complaining amidst a 3 game winning streak and
a potential sweep of the dreaded Yankees. You guys are too hard on
these guys.. ;-)
/Jeff
|
29.1324 | Pennant fever grips Hub!! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jun 18 1992 09:19 | 2 |
|
|
29.1325 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Jun 18 1992 12:40 | 5 |
| back a few
How about "A closer must pitch the 9th or forfeit his millions
to the set up reliever"
Jimbo
|
29.1326 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Jun 18 1992 13:20 | 6 |
| /Jeff, I think it's more like "hated" Yankees, rather than "dreaded".
'Sides, Sox fans haveta have something to complain about. Usually,
that's not a problem, tho. :*)
lEe
|
29.1327 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu Jun 18 1992 13:41 | 5 |
| Did Hobson tell Harris and Clark to go to their rooms without
supper after last night's game?
/Don
|
29.1328 | Some good news | SHARE::DERRY | So What'cha want? | Thu Jun 25 1992 08:12 | 1 |
| at least they aren't gonna lose today....
|
29.1329 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jun 25 1992 11:07 | 7 |
| re 58.95:
NESN SportsDesk this morning reported that Burks suffered severe back
spasms, but nothing more. They said he's day-to-day.
py
|
29.1330 | Cain't git blood from a stone. | CTHQ3::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jun 25 1992 12:06 | 20 |
| GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GO... and counting.
As Steve Tyler says " Going Dowwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn?!"
Which Milwaukee pitchers are salivating at the thought of their ERA
dipping lower towards the Mendoza line ? As the Bosox avg. gits nearer.
Sad state of affairs for this lifelong Sox fanatic. All three
outfielders injured, PawSox already up, the pitchers must really
be enjoying this season. Wheww. Poor Hobson looks lost, what can he do.
Funny how both Boston papers are running features on Joe Morgan. Joe
must be grinning like the proverbial Cheshire cat. Well both Morgan
and Richie Hebner just about predicted as such preaseason. And Hobson
can't do a dang thing about it.
When do the Patriots begin?
Sadly,
MikeL
|
29.1331 | Thank God for WTBS and National League baseball! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Thu Jun 25 1992 12:50 | 1 |
|
|
29.1333 | Will the Gerbil be placed on the DL? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Thu Jun 25 1992 12:51 | 1 |
|
|
29.1334 | 9.5 GONGS and rising... | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jun 25 1992 12:53 | 50 |
| re .1331:
Amen Slasher!
re .1330 (MikeL):
I agree 100%, Butch Hobson is the least of this team's problems
(and Dan Shaughnessy's suggestion that the return of Joe Morgan would
magically make all this team's problems go away is full of it, even by
Shaughnessy's standards).
I think a big turning point downward for this franchise was the
off-season between the 1990 and 1991 seasons.
As a panic reaction to Mike Boddicker being signed by KC, the Sox went
nutzoid and gave megabuck free agent contracts to Jack Clark (whom no
one else except the Phillies had a passing interest in), Matt Young
(WHY?!?!?), Danny Darwin (whom they mistakenly assumed had the
durability to be a full-fledged rotation starter), and extended the
contracts of some other so-so players (Brunansky for one).
No plan, just a reaction with little if any thought.
The end result is a roster with a significant percentage of so-so
players who are untradeable because they come with hefty price tags
(see also Kansas City Royals, California Angels).
For this reason, the "trade to shake things up" that Sox fans are
clamoring for ain't gonna happen. What's there on the Boston roster
for tradeable commodities, beyond maybe a 3-4 starter? A Jody Reed
that everyone knows is eligible for free agency at the end of next
year? One of a cast of thousands of fair-to-decent average, no power,
mediocre defense 1B/OF/DH types? Only in the dreams of "geniuses" like
Eddie Anvilhaid who open their shows with "I'm So Excited" one day and
"Abandon Ship" the next.
And the strong free agent pool (Bonds/Sierra/Puckett/Ripken/Swindell/
Drabek among others) that'll be out there after this season? Thanks to
funds committed to a bunch of deadwood, the Sox' ability to pursue
these players will be severely limited (if not out of the question
altogether).
Top all this off with a Pawtucket club cluttered with the likes of has
beens and never wases like Tommy Barrett, Luis Aguayo, John Shelby, Bob
Geren. etc., etc., etc., and the bottom line becomes all too clear.
It's going to get a lot worse for the Red Sox before it gets better...
py
|
29.1335 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't leave me hangin, I wanna be gangin | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:29 | 5 |
| Tsk tsk tsk... youze guyz sound like you're out of it or something.
The Tigers are only a Go (half gong) behind you guys. We have the
pitching to go all the way. Don't you think a rotation that includes
Tanana, Terrell and Leiter strikes fear in the AL?
|
29.1336 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:33 | 5 |
| Hey Walt, that trio of Cy Young candidates will not get to pitch
against the Fortune Sub/.500 team all the time. Heck, if DoorMatt
Young got to picth against the Slobs he would finally win a game.
/Don
|
29.1337 | ArnoldEarlyJackLamabeIkeDelockMattYoungDannyDarwin | CTHQ3::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:45 | 25 |
| I hear ya PY,
Agreed. I hear Louigi is lookin at Gary Pettis? Why, jest bring up
Shelby. And why ain't Cerutti up. Plenty of seats will be available in
August and September, and people will scoop em up because of the
park. Hope the Sox don't misinterpretate (thanks Clem) that.
We cain probably sit behind da dugout fer right field seat prices
when Tigermania rolls ( yea I mean you Cecil!) around.
One thing about Morgan I gots to relate. Now Joe has remained pretty
tightlipped about the whole situation, but I heard him on Eddie
Andelman's show the other day. Eddie was ranting about the 600 Club
effect and asked him what he thought. Joe paused for a sec and said
and I paraphrase " I was talking to Greenwell last year and he told
me that when he hit the ball to left field it died and sliced towards
the stands so it had to be the 600 club. I told Greenwell that the
reason they all died wuz because he couldn't hit the damn ball hard
enough!" I was rolling. No wonder the veterans didn't like him.
One thing I do enjoy about Anvilhaid is the "GONGS" as he opens the
show. He said yesterday that it was his mission in life to be an
ingrown hair on Lou's ass. And I quote.
MikeL
|
29.1338 | "If Eddie Andlemnan knows baseball..I'll wrassle cows | CTHQ3::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jun 25 1992 13:49 | 4 |
| HAHAHA Slash.
DL for ZiM?? Discombubulated Lemming?
|
29.1339 | Sox threw a lot of money away, but it clears up soon... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:04 | 38 |
|
> And the strong free agent pool (Bonds/Sierra/Puckett/Ripken/Swindell/
> Drabek among others) that'll be out there after this season? Thanks to
> funds committed to a bunch of deadwood, the Sox' ability to pursue
> these players will be severely limited (if not out of the question
> altogether).
Maybe, maybe not. Peter Gammons wrote recently that Lou Gorman made
the comment that he should be able to free up $8-10 million from his
payroll this winter. The question is whether they'll be willing to do
something with it or just cut their current free agent losses and
pocket it. If the writing on the wall regarding the upcoming national
TV contracts (affecting small market teams more than large market ones)
finally becomes clear before this off-season's free agent season, the
glut of top-notch free agents might force a reduction in what some of
the players are asking for.
I don't know if they'll do anything (probably not), but I like the Red
Sox' current salary structure more than that of some other large market
teams like the Mets, Cubs, and Dodgers who also aren't getting their
money's worth but have made some larger, more recent signings. By the
end of the 1993 season, the hefty contracts of Boggs, Pena, Greenwell,
Young, Clark, Brunansky, Burks, and Reardon will all be gone (Boggs,
Pena, Reardon, and Bruno after this season). Only Roger Clemens and
Frank Viola are signed on into the mid-1990s, and I have absolutely no
problems with that.
I can see the acquisition of either Bonds or Sierra as a prudent
investment, more so than the recent signings of Strawberry, Bonilla,
Sandberg, etc. For the bucks they're asking, I'd stay away from the
rest, the guys over 30 (both Ripken and Puckett turn 32 this season and
will be 33 in the first year of their deals-- that's a definite risk to
any five-year deal). I'd like to see the Red Sox thinking that way if
it's at all possible, and not just throwing up their hands claiming
that they (stupidly) tried free agency but it just doesn't work.
glenn
|
29.1340 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:14 | 10 |
| Hey who cares?? Maybe Roger will win another Cy Young. That will make
the Sox fans so happy they'll buy another 2 million tickets. Rather win
a Cy Young then a WOrld Series.
JD
PS: Glenn - why do folks think the Bonilla signing is so bad? He's on his
way to another 100 ribby season - which is all I, as a Mets fan, wanted or
expected. If HoJo could start hitting, it would help. Bonilla, IMO, has
been doing fine.
|
29.1341 | I don't think he's in the top 15 players in baseball... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:20 | 15 |
|
> PS: Glenn - why do folks think the Bonilla signing is so bad? He's on his
> way to another 100 ribby season - which is all I, as a Mets fan, wanted or
> expected. If HoJo could start hitting, it would help. Bonilla, IMO, has
> been doing fine.
It's not a bad signing; I just don't think Bonilla's in that top tier
of players with Bonds, Sierra, Griffey, etc. The unanswered questions
are what's he going to be worth in 5 years and what will salaries look
like in general at that time? If the Mets don't win with him *now*,
with the uncertain baseball financial climate it could turn out to be
an expensive mistake...
glenn
|
29.1342 | The opposite is much closer to the truth... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:25 | 14 |
|
> Hey who cares?? Maybe Roger will win another Cy Young. That will make
> the Sox fans so happy they'll buy another 2 million tickets. Rather win
> a Cy Young then a WOrld Series.
Just keep repeating something long enough and eventually even *you*
believe it, eh JD? Have you been back to Fenway Park recently? It's
not exactly the most pleasant of atmospheres.
Pretty humorous that you made this ridiculous comment in the same reply
that you state that "a 100 rbi season" is all you want from Bonilla...
glenn
|
29.1343 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:30 | 11 |
| Glenn -
Hey, lighten up! Geez. But after reading the latest group of "IS Roger
the Greatest" in the love-fest note, you gotta see where I get it ;-)
But I'll make ya a bet. Despite the 'ugliness' at Fenway - I bet that next
year, they line up like lambs, and we'll hear a lot of Roger praising.
Admit it Glenn - you are simply using the 'repeat...' line as a cop-out.
JD
|
29.1344 | He ain't the problem | CTHQ3::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:36 | 8 |
| One thing JD,
They'll show up like lambs but won't be as meek. Vocal and mean
maybe, but not meek.
BTW what's wrong with Roger praising. The man's a thoroughbread (sp)
and you know it. You'd love him near LaGuardia.
|
29.1345 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:52 | 10 |
| Mike -
Praising was too timid a word. He's great. End of discussion. But, as
youshould know by now, I don't go into diety raising - and way too many
folks have moved Roger to God-dom. Especially the "Greatest of All Time"
crap.
I'd take Bob Gibson, among others, in a heartbeat.
JD
|
29.1346 | | RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Thu Jun 25 1992 14:53 | 24 |
| I'm half with you half agin' you, JD, on this.
In one way, it would be great iffin the fans said, "enough is enough"
and stopped going to the games. But, hey, I love baseball, I attend
nearly 35 minor league games here in Richmond and if I have a MAJOR
league team in town, I'm gonna go see them
What I would REALLY like to see is all those/you folks who have NESN,
cancel the darn thing. Let Sox management know that you'll go to see
the Sox in person but in no way will you PAY to have them come into
your den/living room.
I think that would send a message that they couldn't weasel out of. If
thew fans stop coming, ala Detroit, they could start to threaten a
move. However, if the 2,000,000 keep coming, they couldn't get league
approval.
One other thing...when Baltimore had that horrid season a few years
back, they brought in close to 2M in attendence. We all said, "Wow,
what die hard baseball fans". If the Sox stink and they bring in 2M
fans, we are a bunch of "blinded by Roger's Light" fools.
Rich
|
29.1347 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:24 | 13 |
| Rat on Rich,
JD, I know that. As far as Roger in the elite, yea well maybe. He's
got a way to go and if he can maintain his consistency he very well
could be considered in the top 5 by the time he hangs 'em up. But he's
got some unfinished bidness in the postseason to giddyap after. And
I hope he can get the opportunity at least one more time in the not
so distant future. And I mean with the RedSox!
MikeL
How'd you know ah like Gibson before all the others also??
Wif Seaver and Carlton not too far behind.
|
29.1348 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:30 | 2 |
| I still like Koufax, and a course Greg Swindell!
Denny
|
29.1349 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:35 | 6 |
| Rich -
At least the Orioles have won a championship that folks can remember - in the
modern era.
JD
|
29.1350 | Clemens *is* a *baseball* deity; catch it now! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:37 | 30 |
|
I don't subscribe to NESN; I steal it. Is taking as opposed to
giving to Red Sox TV coffers okay? (Just kidding about stealing NESN;
actually it just sort of comes in on my cable system with a distorted
but watchable signal-- kind of like the Red Sox in the flesh).
I'd go to the ballpark 25 times a year if the Red Sox were losing 100
games a season. I'm no frontrunner. I don't consider myself a sheep;
I wouldn't be going to heap praise on the hometown boys, but I don't
think I'd have to apologize to anyone for going to the ballpark and
enjoying myself just the same. I've yet to see any evidence that
"sending a message" to MLB ownership has any positive effect on
operations. If anything, it has a negative effect. The Red Sox
were just as lethargic in the periods of their history when their
fans were relatively the same. About which MLB teams do people
currently claim that things are looking up because the fans are
staying away in droves?
What's wrong with appreciation for Roger Clemens? What fans in any
baseball city don't behave in the same manner towards their stars? Why
shouldn't I prefer going to the park to see Roger Clemens pitch instead
of Mike Gardiner?
Bob Gibson? Hell yeah, I'd be out at the park to see him pitch every
chance I could get. Would Gibson have been any less great of a pitcher
toiling for a team like the Red Sox? In this alternate universe would
we be standing accused of being Gibson-worshippers?
glenn
|
29.1351 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:41 | 6 |
| I don't go along with this 'sheep' crap either. I've missed 7
Patriot home games since 1975, and it's not because I thought the Pats
were doing a swell job. I just like football! I'm sure lots a the
people at Fenway feel the same way. Now only if we could get 500,000
more suckers to go to Foxboro, they might hang around.
Denny
|
29.1352 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't leave me hangin, I wanna be gangin | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:42 | 6 |
| >Heck, if DoorMatt
>Young got to picth against the Slobs he would finally win a game.
I don't know, he did groove a nice one to Cecil on that granny the
other night.
|
29.1353 | An observation I've had for years... | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Thu Jun 25 1992 15:57 | 5 |
| JD, you are certainly the grandmaster "tweeker" of ::sports, and love
every tweeking minute of it, that's for sure!
Hawk
|
29.1354 | Damn right I'm sensitive! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 25 1992 16:59 | 10 |
|
> JD, you are certainly the grandmaster "tweeker" of ::sports, and love
> every tweeking minute of it, that's for sure!
We're wearing him down, though, Hawk. He's no longer demanding a trade
of Clemens as after that Cooney incident in the playoffs, and today he
even used that "g"-string word in connection with Roger... ;-)
glenn
|
29.1355 | | FDCV07::KING | | Thu Jun 25 1992 23:16 | 5 |
| Ahh JD... If Gibson of 1966-1970 were to pitch today he would NOT win
15 games..... He would be thrown out and Suspended for throwing at
batters... Different era, different rules...
REK
|
29.1356 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Jun 26 1992 07:56 | 43 |
| Not being a Sox fan, I can comment on something that's been bugging me.
How come Sox fans are sheep for going to Fenway? Is there another MLB
game in town that I haven't heard about? Some fans like the game,
other people like the atmosphere. What's wrong with that?
If they only go when the team is winning, they are front-runners.
Fans of other teams are called "loyal" when they go to watch a team
that loses more than it wins.
Which fans are better today, Sox or Tiger fans? The Tigers are dying
at the gate. Is that having a positive impact on the team? As a Tiger
fan, I can tell you "NO". If anything, it's a negative impact. The
Tigers have a heavy payroll but are not one of the rich clubs. I'm
dying with them this year, and the fun I get with them right now is
watching the HR and RBI race. That's all I've got to look forward to,
other than the development of Travis Fryman. However, if I had someone
in the catagory of Clemens, then I'd at least know that in 1 of every 4
games or so, we stand a chance of winning without having to put a few
outa the park. My longterm infield combo of Whitaker and Trammel is
aging, and won't be around that much longer. So, I go with what
they've got.
JD, try not to let SOME of the Sox fans get to you. They are NOT
indicative of all Sox fans. I can empathize with you somewhat, having
lived here all my life and never being a Sox fan. Matter of fact, I
spend a lot of my youth having to listen to Yankee fans lord it over
everyone back in the 50's. Back then, I also followed the Dodgers, who
finally won a WS in '55. That kinda got the monkey off of my back as
far as the Yankees were concerned.
I caught h*ll during 1967, particularly when the Sox won the pennant on
the last day as my Tigers lost to the Angels. But, I sure made up for
it, and more, in 1968.
New Englanders love their Sox, and hate to see them lose so often and
for so long. But at least they are loyal, for whatever their reasons
are.
You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
Lee
|
29.1357 | Maybe a rear runner. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Orson Wells, Rosie Ruiz, MrT | Fri Jun 26 1992 08:52 | 12 |
|
How anyone can accuse a Red Sox fan of being a 'front runner' is
beyond me!
Cripes you shoulda heard me at the lasted game I went to! I had
the crowd roaring and gave it to the bums cuz they deserved it!
8^)
Steve
|
29.1358 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jun 26 1992 09:16 | 3 |
| Didn't the Fabulous NY Football Giants draw huge crowds when they
were at the bottom a the heap?
Denny
|
29.1359 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:05 | 13 |
| � As a panic reaction to Mike Boddicker being signed by KC, the Sox went
� nutzoid and gave megabuck free agent contracts to Jack Clark (whom no
� one else except the Phillies had a passing interest in), Matt Young
� (WHY?!?!?), Danny Darwin (whom they mistakenly assumed had the
� durability to be a full-fledged rotation starter), and extended the
� contracts of some other so-so players (Brunansky for one).
I don't think the signing of Clark was any reaction to the loss of
Boddicker. The Sox recognized their power outage even back then.
Young was the panic reaction to losing Boddicker and not being able to
sign any other decent pitchers. They didn't think they could even get
Darwin at the time. When Darwin was available they signed him too and
considered it a bonus.
|
29.1360 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:17 | 27 |
| First off - the sheeps line is actually atributed to one of the BoSox's own
writers. It's been used by lots of folks since. Don't know why, but it
does get a rise out of folks!
Denny - yep, Giants always drew well. I was one of those folks treking from
Yankee Stadium to the Yale Bowel to the Meadowlands following them.
But I havent' seen any airplanes circling Fenway with messages like they
did over the Meadowlands. Haven't seen or heard of season ticket holders
burning their tickets in the parking lot. Besides, IMO, theres a huge
difference between Football fans and baseball fans. Something primal about
football, but cerebral about baseball.
I guess it stems from the attitude of Sox fans - most at least - I know all
of the Sox fans in here never fit this category - but when I first came to
Boston in 1977 I had never met sports fans who thought they were so damn
knowledgeable and fantastic as Sox, and for the most part, Boston fans. It
was hilarious. From "X City only got X people at their championship parade,
to, well fans in X city are thugs, to fans in X city don't know nothing..."
Many Sox fans seem to think only if you know the amount of hairs on Dalton
Jones' butt are you a real fan.
And remember, I've always claimed fans are fans - no matter where you go. Fans
without champions tend to dwell on whether they are the best, or how much
they fill the park....
JD
|
29.1361 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jun 26 1992 10:55 | 32 |
| Bob Ryan has pointed out consistently over this season that there is
whining streak in Sox fans that sets them apart from others. They seem
to feel personally let down when the Sox don't win and take it
personally that the Sox never win a championship. I take it to the
next extreme - a lot of Sox fans get pleasure out of this misery and I
think this portion of fans will drift away if the Sox ever win a World
Series.
As far as the sheep of New England goes, it has been argued that the
Sox have no incentive to do anything to improve the team when they sell
2,000,000 tickets before the season starts. I'm not sure if any team
in baseball except Toronto and Los Angeles does that year after year
(and I'm not sure if Baltimore will either once the novelty of OP@CY
wears off). Lee, I see your point about the Tigers but I would feel
better about the Sox actually doing something to improve if the fans
took a "Show me" attitude and didn't buy as many tickets before the
season started (and/or cancelled NESN in droves). I'm not talking
about the signings that turned out to be mistakes either, I'm talking
about getting really solid front office management.
Finally, JD, your feelings when you came to Boston are exactly the
sorts of feelings that pissed me off about New York fans, teams and
media in my younger days before I stopped caring so much. Consider the
1970 Knicks title. The Knicks won 1 title compared the Celtics just
finishing their streak of 11 in 13 years, and all we heard from New York
is "Greatest Team Ever, Greatest Dynasty Ever". Also, I grew up a
Celtics fan and it annoyed me no end that the Knicks seemed to get 10
times as many books ever written about them for having won one
championship as the Celtics ever did for winning 11 out of 13. It
works all ways.
John
|
29.1362 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 26 1992 11:17 | 8 |
| �folks have moved Roger to God-dom. Especially the "Greatest of All Time"
�crap.
More and more I'm getting convinced that JD doesn't read what people
actually write. I haven't seen anyone say that Roger is the Greatest
of All Time. I've seen people call him one of the greatest, and even
those preface that with "if he can keep producing at this level for a
couple more years."
|
29.1363 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Jun 26 1992 11:36 | 5 |
| Mac, my guess is that JD is referring to the "Roger Clemens -- Greatest
Pitcher of All Time?" note in the Red Sox notesfile...
py
|
29.1364 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Jun 26 1992 11:36 | 15 |
| Mac -
More and more I'm convinced that you only read what you want to - you know -
the stuff you say I do (or T, or others). Its look in the mirror time, bud.
More than one person has trumpeted him as the greatest.
John H.
Funny. Being in New York, everyone I knew was very cognizent of the fact
taht the Celtics teams were much better and greater, history-wise, then
the Knicks. But one thing I noticed when I came hear, was the Boston papers
always reported things from New York which fit their needs. I've always
felt that Boston has some sort of complex about New York.
JD
|
29.1365 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jun 26 1992 11:40 | 7 |
| Boston does have an inferiority complex to New York in a lot of ways.
You may be right about the Boston media reporting what served its
purposes, but there were many books written about New York's one title
and it seemed to me at the time, many more than were written about the
Celtics.
John
|
29.1366 | Civilization ends after the Hudson River | SALES::THILL | | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:15 | 13 |
| I think a lot of places might have an inferiority complex regarding New
York. In Boston, it used to annoy me how college kids from the NY area
would sneer that Bawston is such a smawl town and that everything in
New York is better, etc. Sure, it's bigger in NY, but that extreme goes
in all directions, such as crime, high prices like $1,000 for a cup of
cawfee, etc. Not to get on a New York bashing tirade, but I wonder if
Philadelphia feels the same way, after all, it's the next major city down
the road from New York in the other direction. I got the impression that
a lot of New Yorkers would look at Boston and other major cities (that
aren't as big and "important as NY) as the equivalent of say, Scranton,
Pee-Ay.
Tom
|
29.1367 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Fri Jun 26 1992 12:18 | 9 |
| Giants fans supporting a losing team means they're great fans.
Red Sox fans supporting a losing team means they're sheep.
Why? 'Cuz JD says so.
You must be inhaling that rarefied Wilton air.
/Don
|
29.1368 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | EHaskell,ConradDobler,JD | Fri Jun 26 1992 13:01 | 2 |
|
|
29.1369 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Jun 26 1992 14:06 | 8 |
| I've never really noticed that Philadelphia has an inferiority complex
relative to NY. In Boston you sense this all the time, in Philly I
can't remember ever having that feeling.
Remember: an inferiority complex can be based on reality (.5 :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.1370 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:21 | 6 |
| � Mac, my guess is that JD is referring to the "Roger Clemens -- Greatest
� Pitcher of All Time?" note in the Red Sox notesfile...
Yes, JD is obviously referring to that topic. However, note the ? mark
in the title, and the real discussion going on in there. It's not what
JD would have us believe.
|
29.1371 | Those vagabond blues... | CAMONE::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:29 | 21 |
| I had the same feeling but even worse, growing up and going to college
in Buffalo. Those Lon-GUY-lan-ders and folks from THE CITY (what city?
as if THE CITY said it all) would come up to the SUNY campus in Buffalo
and piss and moan all 4 years about how backward Buffalo was and how
you couldn't get a decent deli sandwich and how there was no great art
museums etc, etc, etc... What a bunch of crybabies. Rude!, let's not
even start on that tropic. Well, I honestly feel that most
Buffalonians (All Upstaters I should say) didn't have an inferiority
complex to NY (a general inferiorirty complex, I'll admit, but not to
NY). I think we were glad we were 350 miles from the cess pool.
Unfortunately we had to pay huge taxes to support the problems of one
of the worlds major cities. Despise is the word. Anyway, when these
crybaby students got there degrees, guess where they headed ? To THE
CITY ? Naw, they stayed in Buffalo (oh that horrid place) or moved
elsewhere. But most of them didn't return. They eventually saw the
light.
I honestly believe that most New Yawkers strive to get out of the city,
not the other way around. Unfortunately they'll never admit it, that
would tarnish there only "badge".
|
29.1372 | Which City? | SALES::THILL | | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:50 | 10 |
| "THE CITY..." Haw! I almost forgot about that expression. OF COURSE
there is only one city on the planet worth that distinction. I once stayed
at a youth hostel in the suburbs of Paris. I asked a woman who was from
the NY area where she got something-or-other, and she said in The City.
"Oh, in Paris?" She looked at me as if I had 3 haids!
Didn't the SF Warriors have "The City" on their uniforms in the '60s? I
always thought that was a little odd. Now if that was the Knicks....
Tom
|
29.1373 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:54 | 26 |
|
> More and more I'm convinced that you only read what you want to - you know -
> the stuff you say I do (or T, or others). Its look in the mirror time, bud.
> More than one person has trumpeted him as the greatest.
Actually, I've seen this topic raised in quite a few places in the
*national* media in the past year, by Elias, Baseball Weekly, Bill James
and others. The mere fact that someone raised the question in the
RED_SOX conference is not so preposterous. What's preposterous is that
such discussion is immediately relegated by some to the domain of
parochial self-interest. Open your eyes, man!
It's also generally the national media which hypes Boston's fans as
knowledgeable and critical, which romanticizes Fenway Park and Boston
Garden, etc. Granted, such praise has undoubtedly gone to the heads of
some Boston fans, but that doesn't change the fact of where it comes
from. When a noted baseball lover like Bob Costas comes out (or used to
come out) to Fenway Park and proceeds to wax poetic about the entire
atmosphere around Fenway, I don't see why Bostonians should be held
responsible and have to apologize. Maybe some fans could be a bit more
humble, but why do these national figures say such things if they don't
believe them? Exactly how far does this Boston sports conspiracy
reach?
glenn
|
29.1374 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death before Dishonor | Mon Jun 29 1992 10:56 | 26 |
| People always tend to be divided on NY City.
There is some cool stuff to do there, no doubt, and I love the museums,
personally.
But, being a country boy, I've always felt "It's a GREAT place to visit
for a day, but I wouldn't want to live there".
When I lived in Paris for 6 months, I really missed the country, the
fresh air, the birds and crickets and stuff. When I'd go running after
work, I'd go into the Bois de Boulogne, which was as "country" as you
could get in my section of Paris. Again, a damn interesting place,
but not one where I'd like to live for the rest of my days.
(I'll never forget coming home for Thanksgiving, and getting out of the
car at my house. It was a cold November night, and the moon, if not
full, was definitly waxing, and I got a good lungful of that cold country
fresh air..... Heaven.)
The people I know who live in The City, are pretty nice, but they don't
understand why I like it out in the boonies so much 8^)
'Saw
|
29.1375 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jun 29 1992 11:18 | 17 |
| Glenn -
For a long time, many of the 'powers' in national sports journalism were
from the general Boston area - or had attended Boston College or Harvard,
for example.
It has lessened, a little, but still the town wields influence beyond
its size and importance.
Big deal about Fenway. Same is said about Wrigley. Folks get teary eyed
about these old parks.
And my personal stance on Elias, Bill James, etc., is well known. I don't
value them, and am damn pround to say I've never picked one up and had
my mind sullied with their dastistics (tm).
JD
|
29.1376 | | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 29 1992 12:17 | 19 |
|
> And my personal stance on Elias, Bill James, etc., is well known. I don't
> value them, and am damn pround to say I've never picked one up and had
> my mind sullied with their dastistics (tm).
That's besides the point. I don't value a lot of it either. In
my opinion Bill James has turned into something of an pompous jerk
(I picked up his latest book at the store, saw that every other
paragraph contained a profanity or some other kind of snide commentary,
and put it right back-- we're talking about baseball, and if it's
something my kids shouldn't read I don't want to own it), but that
doesn't change the fact that such topics have national exposure. Do
you refuse to watch baseball on ESPN on principle, too? If you want
to stick your head in the sand and pretend that discussion of the
future legacy of players like Roger Clemens are only the lunatic
rantings of blinded locals, feel free, I guess...
glenn
|
29.1377 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Jul 01 1992 07:41 | 8 |
| Sox beat the Tigers last night, 8-5.
So, this AM, there was a piece of an interview by a WBZ sports reporter
(didn't catch his name) with Scott Cooper, to wit: "Do you think this
victory will ignite a winning streak?" What an asinine question to
publicly ask a ballplayer. What's he supposed to say, NO?
Lee
|
29.1378 | Says that Burleson is a jerk | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 10:11 | 23 |
| Anyone see the Glob article on Bill Lee this AM?
Bill is back touring New England Grey Sox, whatever that is. Only
had a chance to quickly glance at the article and Lee came up with a
couple of his usual Spaceman quips. Now I think Lee is full of bull,
but he can be entertaining and he doesn't disappoint. When told that
his old nemesis the Gerbil Zim was retiring after the season, Lee
quipped, "Why wait?". He spewed the usual stuff about 25 guys trying
to please the manager back when he was playing as opposed to the
manager nowadays trying to please 25 guys.
Actually had some good things to say about Hobson. Said that Butch
wasn't really the kick-ass type of guy the press has made him out to
be. Lee states that Butch is a real nice guy and a good friend. Must
be intimating that he'll be eaten alive as BoSox manager.
Then he got started on Matt Young. Vintage Lee. Stated something
about running Matt 6 miles every day at the beach to exhaust him.
Lee said that when you run your brain secretes some enzyme that sloes
you down and relaxes you. He said that that was all Young needed; to
be exhausted and relaxed. Said the mind thinks clearer when exhausted.
Hey maybe he's got something there! Nothin' else has worked with Young.
Think what you want of Lee, but he makes good copy.
MikeL
|
29.1379 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:15 | 2 |
| Is Zim really retiring after this season? That's the first I've heard
of it.
|
29.1380 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Leave a Beep after the message. | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:44 | 5 |
|
Sounds to me like Matt Young's injury was "ordered" to make a roster
move.
|
29.1381 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Wed Jul 01 1992 12:28 | 5 |
| Mac I had read somewhere (Globe or Herald) that Zim was contemplating
retirement due to health reasons. The guess was that Gary Allenson
would be called up to Third base coaching duties.
Jimbo
|
29.1382 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jul 01 1992 13:06 | 3 |
| He probably hit a big Twin-tri over at Blunderland!
Denny
|
29.1383 | As attested to on tee vee! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jul 01 1992 13:21 | 9 |
|
I wonder if instead of running 6 miles a day, Matt should graze?
same effect huh?
I remain,
(writers block here...)
Kev
|
29.1384 | Try a pulled cerebellum | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | Don't say I didn't warn you | Wed Jul 01 1992 13:38 | 7 |
| In the Globe today Young claims he is injured (groin) and that this injury has
affected his performance his last few outings because he can't push off the
mound.
All I can say is...yeah, right.
Scott
|
29.1385 | needs a personal shrink, call Dr. Lee | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 13:50 | 12 |
| Doormatt is right Scott,
Ya see since his groin is bothering him, he really can't push off the
mound so when a runner takes a lead off first base, Matt can't throw
there. Now that really is affecting his performance because you don't
see any more baseballs flying into the right field stands. So it really
has affected his performance, you see. We're not seeing his normal
repertoire.
HTH
MikeL
|
29.1386 | Homo Ignoramus | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 13:53 | 9 |
| Forgot to mention this,
Heard on the radio this AM that Young is upset that his family has been
harassed by fans recently. Don't know any more details, but this makes
me sick. #@$%^ fans can boo all they want, but leave the poor bastard
and his family alone. What do they think this is, real life!!
MikeL
|
29.1387 | Makes me sick... | SALES::THILL | | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:03 | 3 |
| Well, Boston fans ARE the most knowlegeable in the country (just ask
us), so I'm sure there was a good resaon to harass the family. It's
just the usual biased media only telling one side of the story.
|
29.1388 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:14 | 7 |
| Tom -
I'm with you. Can't believe how fans from the greatest sports town in the
world could act like that. Must be lies from New York journalists or
something...
JD
|
29.1389 | Hell, Bonilla isn't even playing that badly... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:20 | 11 |
|
> I'm with you. Can't believe how fans from the greatest sports town in the
> world could act like that. Must be lies from New York journalists or
> something...
Wonder if Matt Young would like to trade places with Bobby Bonilla for
a day? Recent New York tabloid headlines have called Bonilla "a liar"
and by the pet nickname "Bobby Bogus"...
glenn
|
29.1390 | Isn't NU is summer session, JD? 8^)'s | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:23 | 4 |
| Nah,
Must be dumb NY college students here fer summer school. Couldn't be
any of our illustrious natives.
|
29.1391 | Fans prove their ignorance again and again | SHALOT::MEDVID | the strain of smiling | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:30 | 8 |
| > -< Hell, Bonilla isn't even playing that badly... >-
In fact, he's now in third place for the NL outfield balloting for the
All-Star Game. How ridiculous. He's followed by Strawberry. Hell,
I've got to put Felix Jose, Andy VanSlyke, or Larry Walker before these
two over-hyped mediocrities.
--dan'l
|
29.1392 | These fans Sip | RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:37 | 11 |
| These "fans" that are harrassing Matt Young's family........are they
the same outstanding folks who jeered and hooted at Jim Eisenreich as
he was suffering a fit on the grass in CF? Or those same knowledgable
folks who tossed missiles at Mickey Rivers? Would they, per chance, be
the ones who were so kind to Bob Stanley's family a few years back?
Hey, Young stinks. But I don't recall EVER seeing any of his kids blow
a lead for the Sox.
Rich
|
29.1393 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:40 | 5 |
| I think Mrs Doormatt and the younguns were getting on Matt and the
Fenway Faithful were just sticking up for him!
Denny 8^)
|
29.1394 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:55 | 8 |
| Agreed Rich,
But let's be careful to characterize them as the lunatic fringe.
They're not indicative ( I hope!) of the mainstream BoSox fandom,
as you well know. Plus, we don't want to get JD started again!
8^),
MikeL
|
29.1395 | | RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed Jul 01 1992 15:46 | 9 |
| Mike, I know these morons are the fringe. And I know that the majority
of fans, no matter where they live and who they root for, are out for
fun and enjoyment.
But it seems that the fringe is sometimes the loudest and most
obnoxious in Boston.
Rich
|
29.1396 | No "Fringe" = everyone is "normal" | SALES::THILL | | Wed Jul 01 1992 15:58 | 13 |
| The "Fringe" is always the loudest, most obnoxious. By definition, it
can only be the fringe who do things like....
Batteries thrown at Dave Parker from the stands....
"Coke is it" chants at certain players just off suspension....
"Keg party at my house" to recovering alcoholics...
English/German/Dutch hooligans in Sweden...
Various drunks/morons in the Bleachers....
"Normal" fans don't do any of these things. It's just a handful of
idiots who paint the rest with a broad brush.
Tom
|
29.1397 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:04 | 13 |
|
I wish that "these fans" and their stories would be accurately
and religiously detailed in the sports section of the local papers as
opposed to only broadly alluded to in brief news reports. There would
be many purposes to doing so: 1) it would serve as public humiliation
and punishment of those actually involved, 2) it would serve to place
specific blame as opposed to the generalities used to give a bad name
to everyone else, 3) it would serve as a deterrent to such behavior in
the future, and 4) it would prevent myth-making of the kind involved
with the infamous inflatable doll and Eisenreich incidents.
glenn
|
29.1398 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:09 | 4 |
| Okay, okay, it was me taunting Matt Young Jr. He went to throw
a slush puppie at me and hit the guy three rows up.
/Don
|
29.1399 | Less attention is better... | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:11 | 8 |
| glenn, while what you listed may deter some of the fringe idiots, in
place, it would attract attention-seekers. In fact, it would escalate
the problem, I would think. Yes, public humiliation would affect you,
me, and most everyone in this file. But, these idiots causing the
problems have no conscience and couldn't care less...
Hawk
|
29.1400 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:12 | 3 |
| HAHAHA /,
Only three rows, mo' control than Pop!
|
29.1401 | | CAMONE::WAY | You think slower when you graze | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:14 | 8 |
| If society is represented by a bell curve, then there's always gonna
be a fringe....
Scary thought!
'Saw
|
29.1402 | A bell curve is alot like rugby! | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:15 | 1 |
|
|
29.1403 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:05 | 4 |
| Hell Saw, if society was represented by a Matt Young curve, almost everyone
would be on the fringe! ;-)
JD
|
29.1404 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Leave a Beep after the message. | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:10 | 7 |
|
I heard the Slush Puppy was fired from the sixth floor of the
Prudential building, although theorists say a second was slung from a
grassy knoll in right field.
Dickstah
|
29.1405 | | RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:29 | 4 |
| Glenn - how is the fact that bleacher idiots taunted Eisnreich a myth?
Rich
|
29.1406 | It's just been accepted but I've never seen the source... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:55 | 18 |
|
> Glenn - how is the fact that bleacher idiots taunted Eisnreich a myth?
I believe that the incident has been mythologized. It wasn't reported
at the time; I think someone called it to Peter Gammons' attention
later on and he wrote about it and the thing took on a life of its own.
I've heard from someone who was there that no one knew what was going
on (Eisenreich's condition was unknown at the time) and most fans
thought he was putting on some kind of act between innings and a few
responded to it. I just don't believe that the centerfield bleacher
area was this frothing mass of humanity that drove Eisenreich to a
nervous breakdown like it's been made out to be. I would once like to
hear Eisenreich's version of what happened from his point of view,
though. It'll inevitably come up if he's sent to Boston as has been
rumored of late (but I'd say that's unlikely).
glenn
|
29.1407 | Eisenreich | RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Thu Jul 02 1992 09:37 | 22 |
| Glenn, as I recall the incident (and it WAS reported on the next day),
Eisenreich was playing for the Twins/Royals and was known to suffer from a
condition that caused him to have involuntary spasms. Matter of fact,
before the Twins/Royals series, there was a nice write up in the paper
talking of Eisenreich's courage and the Twins'/Royals' patience and
understanding.
While in CF, Eisenreich began to experience a mild seizure. Hard to see
twitches and such.
Sadly, there were a few morons (The Fringe) who had been giving him a
little hard time. They picked up immediately on what was happening and
started carrying on and enlisting others to join him. Admittedly, only
a few participated but they made alot of noise and yelled derisive
remarks as a trainer led Eisenreich off the field.
As far as I know, Eisenreich never commented on the incident, publicly.
But, it was not a myth, it did happen, and it was reported, though not
sensationalized, the next day.
Rich
|
29.1408 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 02 1992 10:27 | 25 |
|
Your recollections on Eisenreich are probably closer to the truth than
mine, Rich. I guess my only objection is that with every passing year,
in Ainge/Rollins fashion, the story has moved towards how the Boston
bleacherites taunted Eisenreich into a nervous breakdown. While a
couple of ignorant jerks probably did taunt him as it was going on, I
don't think they were the cause of his problems (I feel a lot worse
about some of the stuff Dave Stewart put up with while warming up in
the bullpen where the hecklers knew *exactly* what they were doing). I
practically live out in those CF bleachers and while there are some real
sharp wits out there who are a lot of fun I've never seen anything
remotely similar to that kind of cruelty, so I'm probably just defensive
about it.
I did see the comments from Matt Young, and I honestly don't know if
there's a solution to that one. The fans weren't heckling Young's
family, they were heckling *him* before Young's wife told them to show
some class around the kids. Hopefully they did, but I can tell you
from experience there's no place in that ballpark (except maybe The 600
Club) where you're not going to hear Matt Young jeered and booed.
Whether or not that's acceptable behavior is another debate in itself.
Within bounds, my personal opinion is that it is...
glenn
|
29.1409 | Is that flamingo or flamingoe? | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Honk if you hate noise pollution | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:08 | 22 |
|
So what's the story with the Red Sox now playing rock 'n' roll between
innings? C'mon, do they *have* to be like fifteen-thousand-eight-
hundred-and-twenty-one other parks/arenas that play "Centerfield",
"Rock 'n' Roll, Pt. II", "We Will Rock You" and all those other tunes
every time there's a break? Like, do people go "Hey, let's go to the
game this weekend, I hear they play music now?"
I'm neutral on the organ music. I can take it or leave it, except that
there is a warm, fuzzy feeling hearing "Take me out to the ballgame" in
the middle of the seventh. Tradition and nostalgia and all that rot.
Hey, here's a novel idea: How 'bout they play the "Charge!" call on
the trumpet everytime they get a runner on base. Oh, and as long as
we're talking tacky, why not a goofy mascot who prenends to harrass
the umpires? Yuk, yuk....that gets the fans goin' every time.
Hey, while they're at it, let's plant some plastic pink flamingoes
in the outfield.
Dickstah
|
29.1410 | Hire Tommy LaSordid as manager! Wayne Newton sings the N.A.! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:11 | 1 |
|
|
29.1411 | or was it everyone in Fenway, or all of Boston? | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:17 | 7 |
| �Admittedly, only
� a few participated but they made alot of noise and yelled derisive
� remarks as a trainer led Eisenreich off the field.
And, as Glenn pointed out, the story grew. It grew to the point where
the entire bleacher crowd was hurling down jibes and obscenities upon a
poor, twitching man, collapsed on the ground, having a seizure.
|
29.1412 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:19 | 1 |
| Dickstah, why stop there? Let's get Dot Races at Fenway!!!!
|
29.1413 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Thu Jul 02 1992 12:28 | 4 |
| I think they should play the song that those left on the Titanic
were singing just before it sank.
/Don
|
29.1414 | | CAMONE::WAY | You think slower when you graze | Thu Jul 02 1992 12:57 | 10 |
| > I think they should play the song that those left on the Titanic
> were singing just before it sank.
Nearer my God to Thee, nearer to Thee.....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.1415 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Honk if you hate noise pollution | Thu Jul 02 1992 14:19 | 3 |
|
Excuse my ignoramousness, but what's a Dot Race?
|
29.1416 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu Jul 02 1992 14:29 | 2 |
|
|
29.1417 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 02 1992 14:44 | 10 |
| Dickstah,
A dot race takes place on a message board at a ballpark. It shows an
oval track with 3 lanes, each lane has a dot in it. The dots race
around the track. It's the sort of thing that's baseball purists
totally disdain while nouveau fans love them. Sort of like rock music
instead of organ music, placards, cheerleaders, mascots, the DH, phony
turf and lights. :-)
Ninj
|
29.1418 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 02 1992 15:01 | 3 |
| So what's 6, 2, and even? I know Turnpike Joe said it in a
commercial once.
Denny
|
29.1419 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Meghan is 15 months old today | Thu Jul 02 1992 15:09 | 8 |
| re .1418:
I remember hearing "6 2 and even" on the Dick Tracy cartoons...one of
Tracy's assistants (Joe Jitsu?) used to say it as he was signing off on
his wristwatch radio. Don't know if that's where it originated.
py
|
29.1420 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 25 or 6 to 4 | Thu Jul 02 1992 15:16 | 2 |
|
|
29.1421 | | CAMONE::WAY | You think slower when you graze | Thu Jul 02 1992 15:17 | 8 |
| 36,24,36
'Saw_for_Hawk
|
29.1422 | only 36! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 02 1992 15:34 | 2 |
| Being a little less than generous there aren't ya 'Saw?
Denny
|
29.1423 | D | CAMONE::WAY | You think slower when you graze | Thu Jul 02 1992 16:12 | 1 |
|
|
29.1424 | not so great to be back | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Mon Jul 06 1992 14:17 | 10 |
|
How can Wade Boggs have 600K+ plus votes for the All Star game? Only way
I can figure it is that his agent hired some ole timers at 5 bucks an
hour to stuff the ballot box.....
Po Po Roger....You just knew he was hurting to be pitching that bad...
mike
|
29.1425 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jul 06 1992 14:44 | 10 |
| Mike, it has to do with what happens when fans get the vote.
Most fans are not knowledgeable. Most fans will therefore take the
easy way out and vote for the familiar name(s) when filling out an
All-Star ballot. All-Star voting is biased against players in the
early parts of their careers and toward players in the later parts of
their careers. All-Star voting is dumb. All-Star voting is not worth
getting excited over.
John
|
29.1426 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 06 1992 14:48 | 2 |
| And afterall, it is the All-STAR game and not the
All-Best-Player-Between-March-And-June Game.
|
29.1427 | face it guys I'm right this time | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Mon Jul 06 1992 16:54 | 6 |
|
Sorry guys but the amount of the votes reeks of ballot stuffing to me. He's
like 300K votes ahead of anyone else. Given his on-going contract fueding
I smell a rat....
mike
|
29.1428 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:07 | 8 |
| re AL All-Star 3B:
I voted for Edgar Martinez.
Robin Ventura also deserves it ahead of Boggs this year IMO.
py
|
29.1429 | like Ninj says - yecch! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:21 | 8 |
| there was a blurb in SI about a bunch of DJ's in Pittsburgh (?) who
mounted a campaign in shopping malls to get 2 guys voted in. I forget
who they were but the were both #3 in the voting but are #1 in
dastistics.
hth,
Kev
|
29.1430 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:24 | 10 |
| There ain't nothing you cain do about ballot stuffing. There ain't
nothing you cain do about about the voting.
It's a meaningless mid-season exhibition game. Why do so many people
get so bent out of shape about who's playing?
The game has always been an award for meritorious service to the game
anyway since a past-prime Babe Ruth made it in 1933 and 1934.
John
|
29.1431 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:38 | 11 |
|
I really don't think there's any ballot-stuffing going on in Boston in
behalf of Boggs. The guy is just not that popular in Boston, period,
and unlike with the situation in Toronto where every hometown player
is receiving a high number of votes, Boston players are not getting
many in general (nor do they deserve to). He's riding on past
accomplishments and national reputation, or as I heard someone suggest,
with the kids on his rookie card value...
glenn
|
29.1432 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:42 | 9 |
| True. I read somewhere this weekend that if you left the All-Star vote
up to the kids, they'd still vote for Bo Jackson because the value of
his cards is so high.
The Red Sox, to their credit, do not seem to encourage the Fenway
Faithful to vote for the Sox players as much as other teams encourage
their fans to vote for their own homeboys.
John
|
29.1433 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Mon Jul 06 1992 17:44 | 17 |
|
> I really don't think there's any ballot-stuffing going on in Boston in
> behalf of Boggs. The guy is just not that popular in Boston, period,
> and unlike with the situation in Toronto where every hometown player
> is receiving a high number of votes, Boston players are not getting
> many in general (nor do they deserve to). He's riding on past
> accomplishments and national reputation, or as I heard someone suggest,
> with the kids on his rookie card value...
That's part of my point Glen. The Locals aren't stuffing the boxes for
him so who is? Don't seem like Kids could make a 300K vote difference.
But an agent paying people to punch out them little Wade spots, now that
sounds plausible.....
mike
|
29.1434 | Hey Hey My My... Sox are dyin' | SHARE::DERRY | GONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONG | Tue Jul 07 1992 09:16 | 13 |
| Okay. I'll be the first to admit that I haven't seen a Sox game since
Clemens 2nd try at number 10 (and I won't watch them again until he
wins 10).
They are now 12 games back and will soon be sharing rent with Cleveland
so... what the heck is going on? You can't blame it on injuries and
you can't blame Hobson, ALTHOUGH, I thought this guy was supposed to be
some hard nose, take no crap, put in 100% every game type of guy. I
certainly haven't seen any indication that he's pushing any buttons...
Are they going to unload all those big $$$ nonproducers? Go with the
kids? Will the fans be willing to accept that scenario? Would they
care? Do you?
|
29.1435 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jul 07 1992 09:33 | 35 |
| Mike, while it may seem plausible it's highly unlikely.
Wade Boggs, like it or not, is arguably the best-known third baseman by
the general populace in the American League. He's been playing at a
consistently high level for a long time, he's won a lot of batting
titles and he was involved in a major off-the-field scandal. All of
this makes him the most famous third baseman currently playing. Note
that I didn't say he's the best third baseman currently playing,
because he's probably not (and I find it hard to say who's the best at
anything) but he's certainly the best-known.
If you restricted All-Star voting to rotisserie nuts, you'd get the guy
who was having the best season (and I have no idea who that is). If
you restricted it to a combination of players and media, you might get
the guy having the best season at the position or you may not, because
these folks may vote on reputation just as much as statistics. But,
take your average casual fan at a ballpark. S/he goes to a game, is
handed a ballot and starts to punch the little squares. S/he comes to
3rd base, American League, and thinks "Boggs. He's had lots of good
seasons before and probably is having another good one. I'll vote for
him. Besides, I don't know who half these other guys are." It's a
conditioned reflex.
Boggs didn't make some games early in his career when his numbers
probably warranted him going. Cal Ripken probably didn't. Kirby
Puckett probably didn't. Ryne Sandberg probably didn't. These guys
will probably make it until they die. Heck, if Steve Garvey's name was
still on the ballot he'd probably still be going.
All-Star games and voting are as much lifetime achievement awards as
anything else. Once a player becomes established in the minds of the
fans as an All-Star he'll continue to make the team whether or not his
performance actually warrants it.
John
|
29.1436 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Honk if you hate noise pollution | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:01 | 11 |
|
Time to clean house. Clemens is the only keeper, IMO. Everybody else
goes out on the yard sale table. Get as many young prospects as
possible and sort 'em out later. O.K., keep Viola, too.
This team was a lot more fun when they hit the hell out of the ball
but still had a lousy record. Where's Dick Stuart when we really need
him?
Dickstah
|
29.1437 | It's over, long gone... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:02 | 14 |
|
You can't blame the Sox' demise on injuries because they were stinking
it up even when everyone was relatively healthy, but injuries have now
taken over and precluded any shot at a comeback. Earlier in the year
Sox' fans were lamenting the fact that the guys who were in there
weren't meeting expectations with the bats in scoring so few runs, but
now with Greenwell and Burks shelved and with Plantier in and out I
think they're exactly meeting expectations in scoring so few runs.
When you look at that everyday lineup now it's deflating to the spirit
before the game has even started...
glenn
|
29.1438 | Mo *DID* hit a homer last night tho' | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:13 | 1 |
|
|
29.1439 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:49 | 4 |
| �You can't blame it on injuries
I think they are certainly a factor. At least it helps explain the
slumps of Boggs, Burks, and Greenwell.
|
29.1440 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Tue Jul 07 1992 12:19 | 1 |
| I think they should keep Boggs now that he's shaved his moustache.
|
29.1441 | Not what they used to be | CTHQ2::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:33 | 4 |
| The explaination of bad years by Boggs, Burks and Greenwell is
partially injuries (small part), and largely diminished talent and poor
attituded. I predict Boggs will come alive in the second half of the
season, in a dialing-for-dollars move.
|
29.1442 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:53 | 8 |
| I don't think anyone is going to want to sign Boggs for anywhere near
the money he wants. I think the Red Sox were smart to not tie him up
in a long-term contract before the season started.
I predict also that a lot of these Red Sox players will find the market
radically different when it comes time to sign their next contracts.
John
|
29.1443 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:57 | 10 |
| �I think the Red Sox were smart to not tie him up
� in a long-term contract before the season started.
From a business sense you're probably right, John. However,
traditionally, teams have signed their popular/productive players to
megabuck/year deals as a pay back for working at below market value in
their early years (see Cubs/Sandberg for a recent example). With the
uncertainty of a 1994 TV contract and a potential glut of big money
free agents, I don't think the Sox will be the only ones to buck
tradition.
|
29.1444 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 07 1992 18:14 | 19 |
|
The way Boggs is going, by the end of the year he'll be begging for
the two years, $8-9 million the Sox were offering before the season
started. No way is anyone going to give him a four-year, $15 million
deal at this point. Before the season started I thought that the Sox
should have compromised with a three-year deal, but now it looks like
they made the smart decision.
Boggs doesn't have injuries as an excuse, but Greenwell's and Burks'
injuries have only played a small part in their problems? Greenwell's
out for the year after they opened up his elbow and found a major tear
and tendon damage. There's no way a career .300 hitter drops to .220
with zero power otherwise. And I wasn't even totally dissatisfied with
Burks before went down with the back injury. He was the only guy
really hitting some home runs and driving in some runs on the entire
team. Injuries to these two have hurt the Sox significantly...
glenn
|
29.1445 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | Honk if you hate noise pollution | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:09 | 11 |
|
Jeff Rearend, The Terminator, I mean the Firestarter, The Opener not
The Closer, serves up another ninth inning meatball to George Brett
to tie the game. He must've thought Roger was pitching as was
originally scheduled.
Roger will need to shut out his opponents in order to have a chance for
a win, and that most likely will go extra innings.
-Dickstah, keening while passing water again
|
29.1446 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 09:46 | 9 |
|
"I'm sure every time I come to the plate and look up at that
[owner's] sky box, I wanna hit the ball off the wall and hit
those three-run homers. It might have been a different year
if I'd have signed in spring training. It might have been a
totally different year."
_Wade Boggs on why he's batting .225 at
Fenway so far this year.
|
29.1447 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 09:59 | 5 |
| I was at Fenway for the first time in a couple of months last night.
Dead ass on the field, apathetic in the stands and 3.5 hours to play a
9 inning game. It doesn't get any better than this.
Ninj
|
29.1448 | Yawn! Another ball game... | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Thu Jul 09 1992 11:06 | 8 |
| re .1477 (Ninj)
Rat on. These games (not just the Ded Sox) are getting out of hand in terms
of length. I can't put my finger on why, other than the increased commercial
time. I guess pitchers and batters are taking longer between pitches or
something. I know it makes it impossible to sit through an entire game.
=Bob=
|
29.1449 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:07 | 22 |
| 1. An extra minute of commercial time between innings adds up to 20
minutes right there.
2. Either the strike zone is too small or pitchers don't know how to
throw strikes anymore
3. Too many throws to first base
4. Too many pitching changes
5. Pitchers take too long to pitch when the bases are empty
6. Batters step out of the box too much.
I didn't get out of the game until 11, got home at 1230, got to bed at
1 and am just cooking along today on 5 hours sleep.
To their credit however, the Sox are running the bases more
aggressively (they're 4th in going from 1st to 3rd on singles) and
performed a successful suicide squeeze last night.
John
|
29.1450 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:16 | 12 |
|
There seems to a double standard at work here. Rickey Henderson, the
all-time leading base stealer and inarguably the greatest lead-off
hitter of all-time, flexes his mighty ego and is instantly vilified
yet Wade Boggs does the same and despite the fact that Wade holds zero
records and the same amount of World Series rings and has played his
whole career in a park conducive to his hitting style nary a word is
said. Granted, Boggs is little more subtle about it but even so.
|
29.1451 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Olympic Village Idiot | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:23 | 10 |
|
Re: more agressive base running
Yeah, like the Gerbil sending Vaughn home from second on a sharp
single to shallow right. The catcher took the throw and actually fell
asleep waiting for Moe to get there and was jarred awake when Moe
lumbered in like a man arriving home to the wife at 3 A.M.
Dickstah
|
29.1452 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:27 | 3 |
| Where was Wade Boggs flexing his ego? I didn't even see it.
John
|
29.1453 | Agree 101% with Ninj. ZZZZZZZZZ... | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:27 | 14 |
| I for one am sick of hearing the Sox and their fans use the 600 Club
as an excuse for this year's lackluster offense.
They didn't show a lot of offensive moxie in a recent series at Tiger
Stadium (very much a hitter's park) either.
Even as a Orioles fan, I must say that the Red Sox teams of the
70s-early/mid 80s with tater bashers galore were fun to watch.
Now, the only time I go out of my way to watch a Sox game is when
Clemens is pitching.
py
|
29.1454 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:31 | 8 |
| But John, look at the entertainment time/dollar ratio now. Baseball
provides a better deal at $2/hr than a movie at $4.67/hr ;^).
Tommy, what's your point? I went back and reread that quote and didn't
see anything about if I don't feel appreciated I don't think I can play
100 %, or I don't feel appreciated so trade me, or I am the greatest.
I see a guy saying he screwed up by not signing that offer sheet back
in spring training.
|
29.1455 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:38 | 8 |
|
I'm not just talking about that quote. I'm talking about a guy who
has consistently referred to himself in the third person, a guy who
thinks the other eight guys on the field are his supporting cast and
now that he's struggling it's not because he isn't executing it's the
front office's fault even though to everyone else on the planet it
looks like they made a very wise move.
|
29.1456 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:41 | 2 |
| Ah yes, the old "Wade Boggs is a selfish person" attack. I see the
arguments for that are as weak as usual.
|
29.1457 | !0 great years and 0 WS rings | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:44 | 10 |
|
"I've had 10 great years here. I went through [Mike]Torrez, Eck
[Dennis Eckersley], [Jim]Rice and [Bob]Stanley all booed out of
town. Is that happening to me ? Are people saying, 'He's strugg-
ling now we got him ?"
-Wade Boggs on being booed at Fenway
|
29.1458 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Makin' the run to Gladewater | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:47 | 4 |
| Don't dust off that mantel to make room for the NOTY trophy yet,
Tom.
Mark.
|
29.1459 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:47 | 3 |
| re .1450
Hold your tounge ! Ricky has more rings than Wade ....
|
29.1460 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:54 | 9 |
|
Doc, what I meant was Wade holds zero records and that same number of
WS rings.
Mark, I don't believe there should be a NotY which is why I didn't
even bother to vote last year. However, I admit I'm stunbling badly
here. It *may* be because I don't have a leg to stand on but I never
let that stop me before.
|
29.1461 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:00 | 11 |
| � Doc, what I meant was Wade holds zero records and that same number of
� WS rings.
Ted Williams has 0 rings too. So do alot of Hall of Famers. What are
you trying to say?
Boggs holds or co-holds several batting records, so the first part of
your statement is inaccurate.
What are you fishing for here, Tommy? Admission to race related
prejudice?
|
29.1462 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:01 | 2 |
| And unless you've been living in a cave, you must have noticed the long
history of Boggs bashing in Boston.
|
29.1463 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't leave me hangin, I wanna be gangin | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:07 | 17 |
|
>What are you fishing for here, Tommy? Admission to race related
>prejudice?
Why does everything start leaning towards race in here? What's
the deal Mac? It's starting to wear thin and I didn't see it mentioned
by Tommy... maybe I missed it.
Wade Boggs looks out for himself
Rickey Henderson looks out for himself
Barry Bonds looks out for himself
Nolan Ryan just wants to play ball.
Kirby Puckett wants to play ball in Minneapolis, but may move
on.
George Foreman looks out for the next burger in his direction.
Anyone else we need to cover?
|
29.1464 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NewYorkSaysNoSLAPing | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:15 | 9 |
| If you think the Sox games last long, imagine if the still had Fisk?
Man the games would be running into the next day every night! And Paul I
think you misread what people are saying about the 600Club. It's not the
reason why the Sox are boring, but the reason why the Sox fans are boring.
I believe it's creeping yuppieism. They don't allow blue jeans in the
600Club, you have to pay for everything with plastic in the 600Club.
Creeping yuppieism.
/Don
|
29.1465 | 200 hit club | JUNCO::GARRY | boston red sox in 92 | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:16 | 7 |
| Re .1460
One record that comes to mind right off is most consecutive 200 hit
seasons
Tom
|
29.1466 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:19 | 4 |
|
No Mac, it's even simpler than that. I don't like Wade. I never
have and I never will. He's a sleazy, egomaniacal, selfish, heart-
less creep. And those are his good points.
|
29.1467 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NewYorkSaysNoSLAPing | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:20 | 4 |
| Come on Tommy, since Wade's shaved his moustache he don't look
sleazy anymore.
/Don
|
29.1468 | George Foreman, you're Wendy's kind of people | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:30 | 7 |
| Trade just reported in the Red Sox notesfile -- Tom Bolton traded to
Cincinnati for OF Billy Hatcher.
re Walt, rollward on the line about Foreman...
py
|
29.1469 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:31 | 7 |
| � Why does everything start leaning towards race in here? What's
� the deal Mac? It's starting to wear thin and I didn't see it mentioned
� by Tommy... maybe I missed it.
Walt, I agree with you, it is wearing thin. The last time Tommy
brought up Rickey he said he didn't want to say it was a race thing,
but....
|
29.1470 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:40 | 14 |
|
>> The last time Tommy brought up Rickey he said he didn't want to
>> say it was a race thing, but....
Not exactly, Mac. What I said was that I was thinking the exact same
as Glenn Waugaman when he said, "I really don't want to start another
race rathole, but I think in fairness without painting with too broad
a brush *some* cultural differences must be accounted for in a straight
comparison between Henderson and Ryan. Ryan grew up on a farm in Texas,
and Henderson grew up on the city streets of Oakland. There are going
to be differences in philosophy based on environment, whether one likes
it or not."
|
29.1471 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 09 1992 13:57 | 13 |
|
I'll stand by that point. However, as has been mentioned, it's not
true that "never a word is said" about Boggs and his ego. Turn on a
sports talk show in Boston, any one of them, and you'll hear otherwise.
Even the quote that Tommy offered where Wade flexed the ego muscles a
bit explicitly mentioned that it was in response to being booed at
Fenway.
Wade Boggs is easily the most controversial figure of the past decade
in Boston baseball history...
glenn
|
29.1472 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 14:45 | 9 |
| Boggs also gets rapped more for being selfish, for taking walks when
the team needs him more to get a hit and for not adjusting his hitting
to the situation than he does for acting like Rickey Henderson and
calling attention to how great he is.
Note I'm not saying that Boggs doesn't do this but my impression is
that he doesn't - or if he has I can't remember him doing it.
John
|
29.1473 | | WWSSB::COOK_T | They don't call them serial wounders, do they?! | Thu Jul 09 1992 14:58 | 15 |
| Did anyone happen to catch the bit about Fenway Park last night on CNN?
It seems that this MIT professor built scale models of Fenway and the
surrounding area before and after the 600club was built in 1989. He
put both models in a wind tunnel and demonstrated the changed wind
pattern. He showed how before the wind used to blow straight out at
center, but now it blows towards center and then back to the plate.
This fall he and his students will model it with some type of wing on
top of the 600club to see they can get the wind pattern back to what it
used to be.
Conan
So much for park effect! 8^)
|
29.1474 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:20 | 7 |
| Wow, this made CNN? It has made the rounds of the local news and
talkshows. There is some discussion on it in the Sox notesfile.
John, I can sympathize with you about last night's game. I was at home
watching it all. That was some real bad baseball interspersed with
some highlight film material by both sides. How can 2 teams look so
bad one minute and so good the next?
|
29.1475 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:25 | 7 |
| I really long for the days when 2.5 hours was a long game. It's
getting to the point now where I don't enjoy going to night games
because I get home too late. I'm an extreme morning person.
I'd also like to see the Sox start their home games at 7PM.
John
|
29.1476 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:40 | 6 |
|
I'd like to see the Soxs start their homegames in FLorida myself...
;^)
|
29.1477 | | WWSSB::COOK_T | They don't call them serial wounders, do they?! | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:44 | 10 |
| re .1474
Yup, CNN. They interviewed Butch, and he said something to the
effect.."So this guy is from MIT? He must be right! I only graduated
from the University of Alabama!". The wind pattern was dramatic, in the
way it would blow out and then curl down under itself and head back to
the mound.
Conan
|
29.1478 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 16:05 | 10 |
| Walt,
You missed one:
The Chainsaw is looking for how Emilio Lizardo became John Worfin....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.1479 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Jul 10 1992 07:46 | 3 |
| Ha ha ha, good one, Mike. :*)
lEe
|
29.1480 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:12 | 4 |
| re .1463
I've noticed this lately from Mac The Knife as well ... a little
backlash Mac ?
|
29.1481 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:16 | 1 |
| Care to 'splain, Doc?
|
29.1482 | This observation has been brought to you by.... | DKAS::RIVERS | Give me a tall ship and a star... | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:43 | 33 |
|
It's been a couple years and I gotta say sumpthin'. Save your salvos.
This broad has Teflon coating. :)
I find it remarkable how much people complain about the Red Sox. Oh,
the angst. The Suffering. The Denied Fans. Even the Hub complained
how the Red Sox ALWAYS do so awful and he doesn't even like baseball.
erf.
'cuse if I trod all over some kind of semi-religious ceremony here,
but really, you folks got nothing to cry about. Hell, I root for the
Padres and what have they done? Nuthin' much. One World Series that
set the record for being the Most Boring Four (or was it Five?) Games
on Earth. And they didn't even win. But, as old farts are wont to
say, We Liked It. The world didn't end when they promptly collasped
back to the Familiar Depths in those following years.
Now, I don't have stats programmed to memory, but the Red Sox seem to
have made the playoffs the last couple years. And if memory recalls,
they haven't exactly been gracing the basement forever.
That's not bad. So they're wobbling around in mediocrity. It happens.
Not everyone can be at the top all the time.
Life really does get worse. You could be a Padres fan. =8)
kimBO
|
29.1483 | 10 GONGS! | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:49 | 10 |
| Yabbut kimBO,
How long have the Friars been in the league? 20 yrs. or so.
Plus it makes us feel good to angst away.
And remember: A Excellent_Loss is still a loss.
8^)
MikeL
PS. Want Jack thw Whiffer back??
|
29.1484 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'm a crawling king snake, baby | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:49 | 18 |
| It's not so much that they've been near the top, or even that
they're being mediocre now.
We're talking about a phenomenon that goes back generations, way back
past baseball's Golden Era. We're talking about tradition, and history,
and the Curse.
It's something you grow up with. Fathers who are Red Sox fans pass it
on down to their sons and daughters, in fact, the case could be made that
the lore of Red Sox fandom is one of the last great oral traditions
on Earth.
I truly pity the first generation fans after the Red Sox finally win the
series. They will have missed so much....
'Saw
|
29.1485 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Slash, the 2nd coming of Andelmen | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:51 | 3 |
| im passing down my yankee heritage to my daughter
and remeber marlins in 1992..
|
29.1486 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Slash, the 2nd coming of Andelmen | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:51 | 2 |
| make that 1993.. :)
|
29.1487 | Hope this gushes enough for my man Bob Hunt 8^) | CAMONE::WAY | I'm a crawling king snake, baby | Tue Jul 14 1992 16:56 | 38 |
| Last night, I watched "When It Was A Game II" on HBO.
I sat there quietly, and let the old images of baseball's Golden Era,
and the remarkable words of the players, sportscasters, and writers,
wash over me, filling me with that quiet warmth and satisfaction usually
reserved for autumn afternoons after a nice brisk walk.
There was some awesome footage of Ted "The Splendid Splinter" Williams,
and footage from the Cardinal's ballpark (with the "Star of the Game"
billboard in right field).
And some striking footage, of The Babe, only a few months from death,
a mere shadow of the great, hulking ballplayer he was in his prime.
If baseball can be considered the lifeblood of America, the common thread
through our generations, the constant in our lives, the "one real thing"
as they said in "City Slickers", than this special program highlights
that, and touches us in special places where we are rarely touched.
For me, it was a wonderful experience. To actually see players that
my father has talked of, to see them run and jump, catch and throw.....
What an experience.
It is an experience enhanced by the rarity of the footage presented.
Years from now my son will hear me speak of watching Jim Longborg,
or Carl Yaztrzemski, and he will be able to pull up a video. It won't
be quite the same....
If you get a chance to see it, watch it.
'Saw
|
29.1488 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 14 1992 17:50 | 4 |
| Dinz, there are child abuse laws in this state...
'Saw, thanks for that pointer on WIWAGII yesterday. I'da missed it
otherwise.
|
29.1489 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Tue Jul 14 1992 17:52 | 4 |
| re .1482
Kim, I grew up rooting for Dave Winfield, Randy Jones, Gene Richards,
et al ... I didn't think it was so bad ....
|
29.1490 | Agreed | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:03 | 17 |
| Way to go, Kimbo.
As a lifelong card-carrying member of the Phillies Phife and Drum Corps, I
know exactly what you speak of. My beloved Phils took 97 years of pure,
mind-numbing tortured mediocrity before they phinally delivered us to the
Promised Land. Sox fans have *nothing* to piss and moan about until they
go 97 years without The Big One. Let's see now ... 1992 minus 1918
equals 74 years ... that's only 23 more years to go.
I will say that the BoSox have choked away more Series than I thought was
possible. Perhaps their fans do deserve a little time off for submitting
themselves to cruel and unusual punishment.
Bob Hunt
P.S. And yes, Frank, that was one helluva gush there, dude. No mention
of the Sumerians though. Better luck nexted time.
|
29.1491 | | DKAS::RIVERS | Give me a tall ship and a star... | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:04 | 19 |
| re. last
Yeah, those guys. We had Rollie Fingers and Goose and all those other
guys who seemed to make the Padres one of their last stops before
retirement. And We Liked It. :)
My point is, that indeed, it is not all that bad to have a losing team.
It's not a bragging point, but not all that bad. That's why it puzzles
the hell out of my why Boston area fans seem to go into great fits 'o
angst over "only" being in first. (present standing excepted)
Cheers,
kimBO
|
29.1492 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:12 | 11 |
| Part of it is the Anti-Sox fans who love to rub Sox fans' noses in the
"What have you done since 1918". Some love to explain it away using
the theories of Calvinism. I suppose it would be difficult to
understand coming from outside the area. Cubs fans are the only ones
who come close to understanding.
Bob, it was mentioned in When It Was A Game II that the Sox have always
been known as one of the first tier teams with the likes of the
Yankees, and Dodgers. The Phillies were in the second tier along with
the likes of the Browns and Athletics. This might help explain the
difference in expectations.
|
29.1493 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:40 | 45 |
| � Bob, it was mentioned in When It Was A Game II that the Sox have always
� been known as one of the first tier teams with the likes of the
� Yankees, and Dodgers. The Phillies were in the second tier along with
� the likes of the Browns and Athletics. This might help explain the
� difference in expectations.
What does that mean, first tier and second tier ??? Expectations for the
Phillies have always been sky-high. I was fortunate enough to live near
Philly through the late Seventies and early Eighties when the Phils were
the terror of the NL East.
Their first NL East title in 1976, the Bicentennial Year, was a treat ...
sorta like the first delicious bite of a fresh apple. But after that,
though, a division title was just not enough. Even after three straight
NL East titles, Danny Ozark got himself fired. Phils phans weren't happy
with NLCS losses anymore.
The 1980 stretch run against the Expos, Astros, and Royals, which finally
ended in the long-sought-after Series title, was a bitter and cantankerous
time. A lot of the Phils couldn't stand each other ... they all hated
Dallas Green ... the press was all over them ... they were dead and buried
I don't know how many times. The dancin' in the streets after the Series
was over was 50% joy and 50% relief, let me tell you.
What does all this amount to ??? Not much ... except that Boston Red Sox
fans are not alone and they never have been. There are plenty of other
teams in both leagues whose fans have suffered over the years. Old teams
like the Phils and newer ones like the Padres. Hell, ask any fan of the
old Brooklyn Dodgers ... They weren't having a helluva lotta fun getting
their brains beat in each year by the hated Yankees.
What separates the Red Sox from other teams is the way they've come so
agonizingly close on several occasions only to blow it in the ultra
extreme clutch. That's it. Other teams fans know *all* about
"non-winning". The Sox have just "non-won" in spectacular fashion. Pain
is pain is pain ... I will concede that Sox fans have had to endure some
sharper bouts with it but all fans know the feeling.
As for this "tier" idea, I haven't seen WIWAG II so I'll reserve comment
until I do. I will admit to being predisposed not to buy it. Fans in
cities other than Boston, New York, and LA have every right to consider
their teams top shelf ... Baltimore, Chicago and St Louis spring instantly
to mind as well as my old haunt.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1494 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WhenItWasAGameIII,IV,V-OnlyOnHBO | Tue Jul 14 1992 19:02 | 4 |
| Kimbo, being a Red Sox fan is kind of like what Satchmo said
about jazz, if you have to ask you'll never know. Lucky for you.
/Don
|
29.1495 | | ROYALT::ASHE | The story of Peter Pumkinhead | Tue Jul 14 1992 23:46 | 6 |
| Doc liked 'em probably because he had that Oscar Gamble 'do...
Saw - can you tape that special for me?
-Walt (fan of the lasted AL East team to win the World Series)
|
29.1496 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jul 15 1992 08:33 | 11 |
| There is a school of Red Sox fans who take great pleasure in being
tortured every year. There is also another group that likes to whine
and complain about the Red Sox always choking and their lives wouldn't
be complete without it happening. The Red Sox are also the number 1
team among the people who write and teach for a living (see: Giamatti,
A Bartlett) waxing poetic about Fenway Park and so forth.
In my case, I would like to see lowered expectations before a season
and a World Series win in my lifetime.
John
|
29.1497 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 15 1992 09:33 | 6 |
| Bob, When It Was a Game II concentrated on the years 1935-1960ish.
People thought free agency would create the haves and the have-nots.
They were there long before. Teams like the Yankees would buy players
from those other teams so those teams could meet their expenses. The
Sox have been known as a "have" since near the turn of the century. As
you pointed out, the Phils didn't reach the first tier until the 70s.
|
29.1498 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'm a crawling king snake, baby | Wed Jul 15 1992 10:00 | 43 |
| Bob,
If you get a chance, check this special out. More Phillies footage than
in the first one, and the uniforms of "then" are just about like they
are now, in terms of the Phillies logo.
re the Sox:
Yes, there are other teams who have waited for years, like the Phillies,
the Cubs, the White Sox, but around the Red Sox, a whole "lore" has
been built up. Yes, the Sox have choked some series away, but in
retrospect, it seems to be the most awful luck, or The Curse.
Perhaps the fact that the Sox have always been "in the hunt", makes the
angst a little more intense.
As they said on WIWAGII, "Hope springs eternal".
on WIWAGII:
Perhaps the most chilling, or spine-tingling segment of the show was the
final seconds, when they read "Game Called". God it reminded me so much
of that time, maybe a tad more than a month or so after school would start,
long about the the clocks would change, when you'd put the ball glove
up on the closet shelf, a ball carefully wrapped inside, and you'd stand
the bat up in the corner (behind your one good suit), and you'd bring
out the pigskin.
The sun would be going down earlier, and your thoughts had changed to
football, you and your buddies suddenly becoming your favorite Giants
players instead of your favorite Red Sox players...
"Game Called"...... stunning, absolutely stunning.
'Saw
PS Bob, next time I'll work in the Sumarians AND the Hittites...
|
29.1499 | A deeper appreciation for the game | NROPST::MPO12::MCFALL | A feather in your cap | Wed Jul 15 1992 10:18 | 28 |
|
I only caught the end of the show, but did catch Ruth and
"Game Called". Jack Palance did a heck of a job in reading his portion
of it.
Seeing this, and reading a book about my favorite team, the Yankees,
called The Yankee Reader, recently, has brought back to my mind the reason
why I wound up liking the team I liked. It was the players. Their attitudes
and habits, and their performances on the field. Listening to west coast
games on the transistor radio when I was supposed to be asleep. Could The
Mick (Mantle) hit another one out? Could that young kid Stottlemyre come
through again? Waking up in the morning and rushing out to get the paper
to read the boxscores and see who did what. I didn't like the Yankees
because they won championships, I liked them because I liked the players
they had on their current team, and I enjoyed hearing about the exploits
of their former players, like Ruth, Gehrig, Dickey, Ruffing, Rolfe, Dimaggio,
Crosetti, Lazzeri, Combs, Pennock, etc. The legends meant something. Only
in the last 10-15 years or so has winning become so important. How could you
like "X" team? They haven't won anything in X years - is a frequent
observation. So what!
Enjoy your teams, and your teams players. Looking back, it didn't
really matter whether they won or lost, it was that they played the glorious
game of baseball, and provived me with a new adventure to listen to or watch
virtually every day of the summer.
BTW, 'Saw - you got it wrong. You stopped pretending to be your favorite
YANKEE players, then started pretending to be a New York Football Giant! :^)
|
29.1500 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'm a crawling king snake, baby | Wed Jul 15 1992 10:34 | 40 |
| > I only caught the end of the show, but did catch Ruth and
>"Game Called". Jack Palance did a heck of a job in reading his portion
>of it.
Palance has one of those *voices*. He's great. I also like Jason
Robards too.
>like "X" team? They haven't won anything in X years - is a frequent
>observation. So what!
I agree 100%. Too much emphasis is placed on winning. Way too much.
To win the game is great.
To play the game is greater.
To love the game is greatest.
> BTW, 'Saw - you got it wrong. You stopped pretending to be your favorite
>YANKEE players, then started pretending to be a New York Football Giant! :^)
Nope.
You're from Connecticut, you know the drill. Connecticut is pretty split
between the Yanks and Red Sox. But for football, there was ONLY one team.
My dad was a Red Sox fan, ergo, I am a Red Sox fan. But oh, how I remember
the ribbing and razzing that went on between my Dad and his friends when
the Yanks took one, or the Sox took one.
I remember one night when Yaz struck out with men on base to end a Yanks-Sox
game, with the Yanks winning. I'll never forget how my Dad's friends
ribbed him about that......
'Saw
|
29.1501 | Steel waiting for the Sumerians & Hittites stuff, Sawmain... :-) | SASE::SZABO | Dances with unemployed | Wed Jul 15 1992 11:26 | 1 |
|
|
29.1504 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Wed Jul 15 1992 12:23 | 9 |
| re .1495
At least the Pads knew how to break the Cubs heart ! Ha ! Down 2-0 in a
best of 5, the Pads smoked the Cubbies three straight in San Diego. And
there were a lot of Cubs' fans on campus. Suffice to say that it was
rather morgue-like after that .... :-)
Also the Pads had some of the coolest uniforms until they went deep
into pinstripe madness ...
|
29.1505 | maybe a uniform topic discussion? | ROYALT::ASHE | Sometimes I rhyme slow... | Wed Jul 15 1992 13:41 | 3 |
| Brown and Gold were always my favorite colors... Up there with the
Grand Rapids Hoops of the CBA, in their Purple, Orange and Green...
and of course, the Michigan Panthers...
|
29.1506 | At least the brown was original | SALES::THILL | | Wed Jul 15 1992 15:39 | 11 |
| Rathole alert!
The Padres looked like giant tacos back then! I think they also had
some orange or red (tomatoes) to go with the brown (meat) and gold
(shell). All they needed was a touch of light green for the lettuce
effect.
Why did the Pads change to from borwn to the boring navy blue that
about 2/3 of all teams wear?
Tom
|
29.1507 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Wed Jul 15 1992 17:49 | 4 |
| Like I said Tom ... it was the packherd mentality that too many teams
have.
I liked the home jerseys of the early 80's ...
|
29.1508 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WhenItWasAGameItWasStillABusiness | Thu Jul 16 1992 13:46 | 8 |
| Craig Mustard has been filling in for Anvilhaid this week and
yesterday's show was about Barry Bonds and Kirby Puckett not wanting
to come to Boston. One guy called up and said that Bonds was probably
to black for Boston. Most callers were trashing on Kriby for what
he said, but if I was a black superstar, and saw what happened to
Rice, I would be hesitant to come here too.
/Don
|
29.1509 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Thu Jul 16 1992 13:57 | 5 |
| I'll beat Mac to the punch.
What happened to Rice?
Mark.
|
29.1510 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Slash, the 2nd coming of Andelmen | Thu Jul 16 1992 14:06 | 2 |
| marcus,
its probaly that number 6-4-3
|
29.1511 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 16 1992 14:15 | 4 |
| > what happened to Rice
His eyes went bad?
He couldn't catch the ball?
Denny
|
29.1512 | | SASE::SZABO | Dances with unemployed | Thu Jul 16 1992 15:05 | 6 |
| > what happened to Rice?
Got steamed? In a minute?
Hawk
|
29.1513 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 16 1992 15:07 | 3 |
|
Add Tim Raines' name to the long list of black players who do not
want to play in Boston for the Red Sox.
|
29.1514 | Another myth | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Thu Jul 16 1992 15:33 | 7 |
| Tim Raines' name is NOT added to the long list.
Tim Raines was interviewed on WEEI earlier this season by Dale Arnold
and indicated that this was not true. I heard him say he'd love to
play in Boston if the right opportunity emerged.
Mark.
|
29.1515 | | FDCV06::KING | | Thu Jul 16 1992 16:00 | 4 |
| Yeah Marky... If the red sox moved!!!!
REK
|
29.1516 | I miss the Pads in brown | CTHQ2::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Thu Jul 16 1992 16:33 | 15 |
| RE: Pads, a few back
The unis changed lasted year. Many of the faithful were saddened by the move,
not only in that they lost their uniqueness, but in that the brown was true
to the padre theme, since it indeed matched the color of the robes worn by the
dudes who worked in the missions found in the area.
RE: Sox and blacks
The problem is real, and I think it is not so much with the fans, but with the
team. They are making strides, however, and a big one was the hiring of Frank
White to be groomed as a manager in the system. They have a long way to go,
however.
=Bob=
|
29.1517 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Sometimes I rhyme slow... | Thu Jul 16 1992 18:54 | 4 |
| re Rice:
If you put up numbers like that, would you want your "Day" shared with
Bob Stanley?
|
29.1518 | Rice is working for the club, fercryinoutloud... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 16 1992 19:02 | 14 |
|
> If you put up numbers like that, would you want your "Day" shared with
> Bob Stanley?
Rice has a standing invitation to have his "day", by his lonesome,
whenever he wants it. The thing with Stanley was just a quickie
acknowledgement right after both players refused to retire with any
grace so it had to be done for them, and has been blown so far out
of proportion as to be unrecognizable. Yaz had his "day" after he
was elected to the HOF (1990), and Ted Williams had his just last
year!
glenn
|
29.1519 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:05 | 17 |
| I was listing to WRKO yesterday afternoon .... forget the Sox coming to
their senses anytime soon. Joe Castiglone was spouting the usual
right-wing crap ...
I knew the Sox were in trouble when Joe Carter passed up Boston because
of race. And he LOVES Fenway ...
The Sox will only improve their status by drafting and signing more than the
occasional Mo Vaughn or Ellis Burks. Then getting them to the majors.
It would also help if they signed more than the occasional Herm
Winngham. For example Bonds AND a decent player with maybe a little
speed ?
At least it's a good thing Hobson's the manager. If he really wants to
play ButchBall, he'll need to get a different type of ballplayer in
here.
|
29.1520 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WhenItWasAGameItWasStillABusiness | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:07 | 28 |
| Rice's problem was a combination of media and club. MrT's cousin
Dan Shagnasty tried to make it look like Rice was trying to collect
unemployment after he retired when it was something he had to do because of
his injury. Larry Bird and Jim Rice were basically the same early in
their careers, but the media cut Bird a whole lot of slack, while comming down
real hard on Rice. Certain members of the Boston press tried to portray
George Scott as some kind of fat, chicken eating moron when in fact George
was a helluva glove, a very good power hitter and certainly not stupid.
Truth is Scott managed an unaffiliated minor league team to a championship 4 or
5 years ago, but nobody even offered him a minor league job. The club never
backed it's black athletes like say Dick MacPherson did with Fryar when
he fumbled a punt in the Patriot's first home game of the season. In my
opinion that helped turn things around for Fryar, because he knew that no
matter what the media said about him the club (i.e. MacPherson) stood
behind him. The Red Sox basically let their guys swing in the breeze when
the media starts taking potshots.
You have to wonder why a guy like Lee Smith, was never considered a
"problem" in Chicago or later St. Louis, but was portrayed as one in Boston.
Ditto for Reggie Smith, only what he went through in Boston was real bad.
So if you're Kirby Puckett you probably will not entertain any offers from
the Red Sox, and that certainly doesn't make him a bad guy. You have to
believe that the players talk, and if all the stuff said about the Red Sox
and black athletes were absolutely false that fact would be communicated to
the players through the grapvine. If the Red Sox ever want to bid for the
services of black superstars, then they certainly have some work to do.
/Don
|
29.1521 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:36 | 25 |
| �Joe Castiglone was spouting the usual
� right-wing crap ...
Care to elaborate?
� I knew the Sox were in trouble when Joe Carter passed up Boston because
� of race. And he LOVES Fenway ...
I hadn't heard about Carter. Besides, I thought he was moved around
via trades and not free agency.
� The Sox will only improve their status by drafting and signing more than the
� occasional Mo Vaughn or Ellis Burks.
You mean guys like Jeff Stone, Wayne Housie, Jeff McNeely? And they've
certainly earned the right to move up to the bigs, haven't they...
� It would also help if they signed more than the occasional Herm
� Winngham.
Like maybe Lee Smith, Billy Hatcher?
I'm not saying there hasn't been some disturbing trends down on Yawkey
way, but at times it does seem as if they get embellished with every
telling.
|
29.1522 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jul 17 1992 14:23 | 14 |
|
Basically the same discussion has been raging on the last few days in
the RED_SOX conference. I don't care what he's had to say about
Boston, I still want Barry Bonds! If the Red Sox keep trying and give
it the effort (and most of their high draft picks the past 3-4 years
*have* been minorities-- Vaughn, Frankie Rodriguez, Steve Rodriguez,
Jeff McNeely, J.J. Johnson, Boo Moore), there can and will be change.
Doc, Joe Castiglione is the Red Sox play-by-play man and is about as
non-controversial as they come. If you're going to smear someone
without explanation, you might as well get the right person...
glenn
|
29.1523 | OK ... how 'bout "parrot" ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Fri Jul 17 1992 15:01 | 15 |
| Hey Glenn, I'm fairly certain that was the guy I heard yesterday
saying,
"Minorities cry racism every time ...."
(He used Oil Can as an example. Never mind that he did get harrassed
here, and never mind that even if he was a jerk, it doesn't explain Lee
or Reggie Smith, or Scott.)
"The Sox get players based on ability alone ..."
Maybe right-wing was the wrong phrase, but "party line", and Pollyanna
seem to fit ...
Doc
|
29.1524 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Jerry Lewis: Giving hope to carry on | Fri Jul 17 1992 15:34 | 2 |
| You sure this was RKO and not EEI? What time was it?
|
29.1525 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jul 17 1992 15:47 | 3 |
| Walt, if it was Jeo C. talking it was probably'RKO. That's the station
the games are on.
Denny
|
29.1526 | What would it take? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:01 | 34 |
|
No Doc, the guy you're referring to is Boston Herald sportswriter Joe
Guilliotti, not Red Sox play-by-play man Joe Castiglione (a major
difference, as one is affiliated with the ballclub and the other is
not; the association with the club being your point). I heard the
entire show, including the pre-game where the WRKO call-in host
questioned Lou Gorman on the subject, and no one but a caller came
remotely close to saying "minorities cry racism every time". It was an
even-handed discussion of the problem, not a race-baiting session.
Agree or disagree, Guilliotti was of the opinion that while the perception
problem is a reality amongst MLB baseball players, it is still only a
perception, as from his experience he knew of no black ballplayers who
were especially mistreated in Boston. He claimed most liked Boston,
and that yes, Oil Can Boyd complained, but that he also said the same
things when Montreal released him (which he did).
I've admittedly grown tired of the Red Sox-bashing because while
they've had a very checkered history, I think they've made a lot of
progress in the last 10 years, including through the draft, in the
organizational coaching ranks (two minority minor-league managers),
in the front office (assistant GM), and in the tens of thousands of
dollars ownership (basically Jean Yawkey) has put back into the
community in the form of inner-city sports programs. Do we ever hear
about any of these positives? No, the Red Sox are still held to a
different standard because of their past.
Already this year Barry Bonds has had similar criticisms of the
Pirates, and Gary Sheffield has had something bad to say about
Milwaukee just about every other week. Are there any exceptions,
anywhere? Can you ever correct problems and put history behind you?
glenn
|
29.1527 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Jerry Lewis: Giving hope to carry on | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:18 | 2 |
| I asked because Jimmy Myers had callers talking about it yesterday.
Guillioti makes sense...
|
29.1528 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:48 | 19 |
| Glenn, things can change, but let's face it, it only takes a Dee Brown
or Roberto Kelly to undo any good works that the Sox have done. And
when this stuff happens every couple of years (Boyd in Chelsea in 88 ?,
Brown in 90, Kelly in 91, Tommy Harper for good measure), it's hard to
build that momentum.
I personally haven't had any problems when I've been in Fenway (may be
my game face and dark sunglasses), but many black people still won't
go, for they percive it to be a bad place to go. Moreover, Boston's
black athletes - be it perception or reality - have a rep of not caring
a whole hell of a lot about the black community - or wanting to be
around it (Reggie Lewis being one *very* admirable exception to this),
hence Jim Rice didn't exactly warm the hearts of many black fans around
Boston either. When people can seize on a hero (the way fans do
Meuthen's Jeff Reardon), it helps to keep the stands packed.
JMP (P is for perspective.),
Doc
|
29.1529 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:52 | 1 |
| Kelly in '91?
|
29.1530 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:53 | 14 |
| Doc,
I don't even know of many white players that care to get involved
in the community either, excepting for the usual appearances which
half of them look real pleased to be participating. Now isn't Vaughn
supposedly getting involved more in the black community since
he's been around? And I hear Pena is quite involved in the Hispanic
community.
And from what I've heard and perceived, and I might be wrong, the
Patriots players of all ethnicities seem to get involved more in the
community.
MikeL
|
29.1531 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:58 | 2 |
| John Stephens of the Pats does/did a lot of work with kids in Roxbury.
Denny
|
29.1532 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 17 1992 16:58 | 9 |
| All of the Sox charitable work seems to be very low key, except for the
Jimmy Fund. Since Mrs. Yawkey passed away we've learned of more and
more things the Yawkey family and the Sox have done for charity.
Part of this may be that not many of the Sox players live in the area
in the off season, so it's not big news in the Boston area if these
players are doing big things in their hometown (Clemens and Greenwell
spring to mind). Part of it is they choose to keep it lowkey (the
Yawkeys especially so).
|
29.1533 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jul 17 1992 17:46 | 19 |
|
> Kelly in '91?
I think this in reference to Mel Hall being detained at Logan by
airport security. Again, what I didn't and still don't understand is
what this had to do with the Red Sox, or even Boston. Those guys are
federal employees, have no association with the city of Boston, and
work under very strict guidelines. Why would something like a black
man being detained in an airport be specific to Boston? Joe Morgan
(the HOF ballplayer, not the Sox' sleepy ex-manager) sued the gov't
for being pinned to the ground and held for several minutes at gunpoint
by DEA agents and airport cops in LA, and won. There's obviously a
race-associated implication of guilt held by a lot of people in this
world, and it's going on everywhere, including but not exclusively
in Boston (there was *no* excuse for the Dee Brown incident,
unquestionably...)
glenn
|
29.1534 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 09:32 | 6 |
| Geez, no comment on 'the greatest pitcher in the history of the game's" latest
little temper tantrum?
This place is slipping...
JD
|
29.1535 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 09:49 | 3 |
| I woulda done the same thing. Sounds like Kimball didn't research
his story.
Denny
|
29.1536 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 09:55 | 11 |
| Denny -
Even if true, I've always felt in matters like that, its better to do it
mano-to-mano, and not for the benefit of lots of folks - sounded like it
was a planned reaction by Roger, and not spontaneous - from the outburst to
the apology to the rest of the reporters.
Hey at least the greatest pitcher of all time finally won his 10th, which
ensures him of the Cy Young award again.
JD
|
29.1537 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 09:59 | 1 |
| Hw about that 2 hitter against the hottest team in baseball!
|
29.1538 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:10 | 9 |
| So JD, why aren't you criticizing the writer for not going to Roger
for his side of the story before he exposed it to a million people?
Roger doesn't have a column to write a response in, so I see nothing
wrong with going public.
BTW, Kimball was on vacation for 3 weeks so this was Roger's first
oppurtunity.
What would your feelings be if the story was written about Doc
Gooden or Nolan?
Denny
|
29.1539 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:16 | 10 |
| Can you imagine the outcry if Clemens did something a couple of weeks
ago? The Clemens bashers would be out in force claiming that Clemens
was taking out the frustations of his winless streak on an innocent
bystander.
The reporter wrote about an incident that occurred 2 years ago. He
didn't even have his facts straight. Another writer came to Clemens
defense in a recently published article citing his charity work and
willingness to sign autographs long after other players would have gone
home.
|
29.1540 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:21 | 12 |
| Denny -
Gooden? Ryan? WQhy would I defend either.
I got what I wanted. Mac replied in exactly the way I knew he would. I'm
glad predictability is still there.
Denny, the writer should have - but he didn't. So by doing the outburst thing,
Ol Rockethaid merely lowers hisself to that level. but I guess when you
are the greatest of all time, you don't worry about that...
JD
|
29.1541 | Herald = WWN (-: | SHARE::DERRY | | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:29 | 15 |
| I thought Roger asked that all the camera people, etc. leave but ESPN
radio had someone in there to get all the gossip... I could be wrong.
While Roger has pulled some stoopidhaid moves, I don't consider this
one of them. The "incident" happened two years ago and the grandmother
decides, recently, to send Kimball a letter. Did she say, "please sign
this for my dying grandson," or "would you sign this for me?" I don't
know for sure but if I'm Joe Big Jock and I've been signing my name on
everything for 15, 30, 60 minutes whatever, I'm gonna want to stop
sometime. You can't please everyone. Kimball was a schmoe to write
about this and not just because it was about Clemens. It could have
been about Phil Plantier, Rick Fox or Billy Andrade, I'd still say
Kimball was wrong.
|
29.1542 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:41 | 13 |
| MAc answered the exact way he should answer. Clemens did nothing
wrong. What is really predictable is you JD. And what's with the
'greatest pitcher of all time' nonsense. Who in here calls him that?
MAybe in the Red Sox conference, but that's not where we are. IF you've
got a personal problem with Clemens, fine. But why keep trying to "/"
in here?
EVERY writer on Sportsbeat last night said Kimball was wrong, and 2
of them write for the same paper as he does. One (Callahan) is the guy
who said Roger has a $5 million dollar arm and a $5 brain. So these
weren't guys who love Clemens. The other 2 were Dan Shaughnessy and
Steve Bulpett, who also have written loads a negative stuff in the
past.
Denny
|
29.1543 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:54 | 3 |
| �I got what I wanted. Mac replied in exactly the way I knew he would.
You mean by looking at what is going on between the lines?
|
29.1544 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:57 | 5 |
| �Did she say, "please sign
� this for my dying grandson,"
According to the Grandmother, she made no mention of her grandson's
health to Clemens.
|
29.1545 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 10:59 | 7 |
| �And what's with the
� 'greatest pitcher of all time' nonsense. Who in here calls him that?
� MAybe in the Red Sox conference,
JD is still apparently making reference to the discussion going on in
that conference. The topic is titled "Roger Clemens, Greatest Pitcher
of All Time?". Please note question mark.
|
29.1546 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:00 | 16 |
| No Mac, I knew you'd get on your valient white charger, and race to the defense
of poor Roger (or any other Boston player).
Denny. Now of course, have I said Kimball was right? No, I didn't. So you
merely knee-jerked. Remember, Roger is the public figure, and sorry, he's
in the limelight. He can chose to handle these things professionally, or like
a spoiled moron. He usually chooses the latter, unfortunately.
As I said, IMO, he stooped to Kimball's level (which should have been obvious as
a dig to the professional standing of Kimball in my eyes...)
Geez, I keep seeing this line "There is no crying in baseball" Don't know
where it comes from - but its the biggest lie ever. All there is is
crying in baseball - from spoiled millionaires.
JD
|
29.1547 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:12 | 2 |
| Ah yes, JD is at it again. His old Quixotic quest to try and tear down
the superstars of the game.
|
29.1548 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:13 | 7 |
| > Geez, I keep seeing this line "There is no crying in baseball" Don't
> know where it comes from
The movie "A League of Their Own"
py
|
29.1549 | Roger was choked up and said what he felt, and I loved it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:18 | 38 |
|
JD, you going touchy-feely-soft on us? A guy's to be criticized for
defending himself? You're starting to sound like these spineless
journalists who play up the absence of emotion in the highly-paid
athlete, and then crap all over him when he delivers, even when HE'S
ABSOLUTELY IN THE RIGHT. They're all millionaires, they're all
pampered and spolied, they don't show us that they care, and when they
do we're going to write that they're millionaires who should just
shut up and take it anyways...
From listening to all the fall-out, including on yesterday's postgame
"Sportsbeat" program which regularly features some of the biggest
yahoos in the sports media business, I'd have to say that I'm
pleasantly surprised by the Boston sportswriters' reaction to the
Clemens incident. To a man, I haven't heard anyone yet say that they
blame Clemens for what he did (although this Steve Bulpett character
did go out of his way to obfuscate around the issue of what limits
that sorry paper he writes for and its editor will stretch the truth
to in the name of "journalism").
Not only did these reporters state for the record that the article was
unfair and that Clemens does more in the community than most Boston
athletes, Gerry Callahan also claimed that this woman's particular
story was full of holes to boot, and without even considering the lack
of context provided by the piece it was an example of very poor
verification work. It's apparent to me, at least, that this was
nothing more than another in a long line of attempts by a Boston sports
"journalist" to make a name for himself by trying to run another great,
marginally unpopular athlete out of town.
Kimball says Clemens was grandstanding. Great! I wish more athletes
would do so. Without consulting Kimball, Clemens embarrassed him in
front of a couple dozen of his peers. Without consulting Clemens,
Kimball created a piece of fiction and embarrassed Clemens in front of
a half a million people. I'd seek retribution, too...
glenn
|
29.1550 | as strong as the Dinz KOD... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:25 | 7 |
|
My buddy Roger ought to pay me to bad mouth. Everytime I do he pitches
a masterpiece....And the buns hahahahahaaaaaa
Kimball's an idiot. He's one those guys who thinks his SLOF doesn't stink..
mike
|
29.1551 | I like Roger's way better (the buns will immortalze this!) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:31 | 16 |
|
> He can chose to handle these things professionally, or like
> a spoiled moron. He usually chooses the latter, unfortunately.
By the way, what would be the "professional" way to handle something
like this? To take the writer aside and say that this was a bad, bad
thing that he did and that you don't ever want it to happen again,
and then to shake hands with no hard feelings? Seems to me that the
logical "professional" thing to do when one's character has been
wrongly smeared in public would be to file a lawsuit. I can only
imagine the public reaction to that, coming from a "spoiled millionaire"
and all...
glenn
|
29.1552 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | why does Led Zep bore these days? | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:35 | 7 |
|
the most important part of the story's missing though, without an ump's
help were all the buns, strikes????
mike
|
29.1553 | HBP | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:36 | 1 |
|
|
29.1554 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:36 | 16 |
| Actually Glenn - I'd have cheered Roger if he did put a lawsuit forth. There's
no place for crap like Kimball's piece. But ol macho Roger had to live up
to his billing - and blow up in the lockerroom. He, IMO, played right into
a jerk like Kimball's hand. Ol Roger is almost as predictable as Mac.
Speaking of Mac - where did I tear down the greats of the game? Where did I
address Roger's ability as a pitcher? Where, ol mighty Mac? Where? Now c'mon,
you should be better at this - it is a sport played with a little round ball.
IMO, Roger did the predictable thing - and IMO, it was a planned reaction. And
IMO, he would have been better really going for the juglar.
In your zeal to prove I'm on some sort of quest, you've stumbled over yer
legs, yet again, ol Mac.
JD
|
29.1555 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:39 | 8 |
| And I didn't even mention throwing hamburger buns. C'mon, isn't that just
a little juvenile? Don't know about you, but when I was about 5, if I did
such a thing, I'd a been sent packing to my room.
Ol Roger really does seem to have a little bit of simpleton rolling around
in his haid, don't he...
JD
|
29.1556 | ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:46 | 13 |
|
> Ol Roger really does seem to have a little bit of simpleton rolling around
> in his haid, don't he...
I'm surprised that you'd stoop to the level of the average sportswriter
in demeaning the intelligence of one of the very best at what he does, a
task (pitching) that by the all accounts demands intense thought and
concentration, regardless of talent level. Why should this
"unprofessional" commentary, much like the "Magic don't talk too good,
do he?" criticisms of the past, be dignified with a response?
glenn
|
29.1557 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:50 | 12 |
| Glenn,
You lost me there. I haven't questioned his pitching, or the intense
concentration it takes to do it.
However, it does seem painfully clear that Roger has problems in certain
settings, and unlike a Larry Bird, for example, he hasn't seemed to 'get it'
as his career has moved on.
Making fun of a Magic Johnson for his speech? What the hail are you talking
about? You better check your valient charger Glenn, it may be a burro. ;-))
JD
|
29.1558 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | | Mon Jul 20 1992 11:56 | 6 |
|
The situation would have been far funnier had there been pies handy
instead of hamburger buns. N'yuk-n'yuk.
Dickstah
|
29.1559 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 12:08 | 7 |
| �Ol Roger really does seem to have a little bit of simpleton rolling around
�in his haid, don't he...
I guess you're right JD. You don't try to tear down the greats. This
and the Jordan/Bird/Lemieux, etc diatribes were obviously written by
someone else with access to your account. I'm sorry for the
misunderstanding.
|
29.1560 | Not too many things more humiliating than being told you're dumb... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 12:31 | 23 |
|
> However, it does seem painfully clear that Roger has problems in certain
> settings, and unlike a Larry Bird, for example, he hasn't seemed to 'get it'
> as his career has moved on.
My point is: so what, and why is this fact worthy of comment? Why is
an athlete's intelligence or demeanor worthy of public scrutiny (and
yes, I did read that stuff about Magic in here; I didn't say you wrote it),
so long as he stays on the right side of the law, like any other citizen?
Time and time again I see and hear Clemens' supposed lack of intelligence
(off the field, not on) belittled by condescending, self-righteous
sportswriters (which translates to the same from brainwashed fans), and
my response is always the same: what does that say for the smartass who
makes a living writing about such trivia? Can you imagine being
required to deal with people every day who've openly and publicly
ridiculed your intelligence in the past, and not only being asked not to
respond to it but to *accomodate* it, with pleasant interviews and other
requests (yeah, yeah, I know, "for x million dollars it should be a
privilege to be humiliated like that")?
glenn
|
29.1561 | :^) | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:08 | 3 |
| Will the last one out of the building please re-boot JD?
Mark.
|
29.1562 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:29 | 14 |
| JD,
Your comments regarding predictability (sp?) come across as very
insultory!!! Clemens predictable....[INSULT] Mac
predictable....[INSULT] If being predictable is so damn bad, then
you might want to look in the nearest mirror!!!! You won't like what
you see!!!! Personally speaking, I tire less from reading
predictable optimism (sp?) than predictable pessimism!!!
Don't care if this helps,
Nelly
|
29.1563 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:40 | 12 |
| Mac -
As I've stated before, my diatribes, as you call them, are always in response
to the over exuberance of certain noters to those players you named - I'll
try to aim lower so it doesn't zoom over your haid (FWIW: M.Air Brooks - Jordan,
Lemiux, Charlie Partee, and Schramm; Bird - all Celts fans)
Nelly -
Who care what you think. I certainly don't.
JD
|
29.1564 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:46 | 7 |
|
What are insults and personal attacks doing here in our friendly
little 'Electronic Tavern' ? Some folks would do well to remember
we're talking sports here. That's all just sports. We ain't settling
the balance of power in the Middle East or ending world hunger so
lighten up a little.
|
29.1565 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:49 | 7 |
| > As I've stated before, my diatribes, as you call them, are always in response
> to the over exuberance of certain noters to those players you named - I'll
Response eh? Care to tell us who brought up the Clemens matter this
AM? You admitted the only reason you mentioned it was to get a
'predictable' response from Mac.
Denny
|
29.1566 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:54 | 6 |
| Denny -
Someone has to keep this place from becoming a boring lovefest, now don't
someone?
JD
|
29.1567 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:54 | 9 |
| So, JD, what is the point then of bringing up only a portion of a
story? A portion that reflects badly on a local sportsperson? Just
looking to harrass (oops, sorry, bring in line) his fans?
Of course some defense would be brought up in this case. The defense
has already been brought up in the media. It is inevitable that a
defense would be brought against claims that were half-baked to begin
with and by a reporter who made no attempt to get verification,
nevermind the other side of the story.
|
29.1568 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:56 | 5 |
| �Someone has to keep this place from becoming a boring lovefest, now don't
�someone?
Perhaps the reputation this conference has in other parts of the
network is justified afterall.
|
29.1569 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:58 | 14 |
| Going back over these notes, I'll remind folks that I started off asking a
question. The nexted replies were directed at me. I replied in same.
The only insults, if taken that way, were against Roger Clemens, and not
fellow noters. If I was thin-skinned, I could make the charge that Mac's
obvious quest against me was insulting and attacking - but I don't care what
he thinks anyway.
So, what's folks problems? I made a comment about Roger, directed to no one,
and got personal replies back?
Perhaps some folks (Nelly) need to read before reacting.
JD
|
29.1570 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 13:58 | 5 |
| JD,
I have no problem with "/", as long as you admit that's what you're
doing. But don't get all self-righteous and tell us your just
'responding' to over-adoring fans.
Denny
|
29.1571 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:02 | 11 |
| > Geez, no comment on 'the greatest pitcher in the history of the game's" latest
>little temper tantrum?
>
> This place is slipping...
>
< JD
Yeah, real innocent question there JD! You didn't even mention
Clemens' name. And you didn't axe a question, you told us it was a
'tantrum'.
Denny
|
29.1572 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:04 | 11 |
| Mac -
again. Did I ever, ever, ever say that Kimball was right? No. You've missed
it completely. All I said was Roger, IMO didn't handle it right, and IMO,
stooped to the level of Kimball. Obviously, you and others have a hard
time understanding that.
Regarding the conference rep - hey, with endless notes about everything from
abortion, sex, baldness, etc. - at least I'm addressing a sports issue.
JD
|
29.1573 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:07 | 11 |
| Denny
But, in the cases of Jordan, Bird and Lemiuex, I was responding to fans (and
I even named them). With utter amazement, and a few chuckles, I was dumbfounded
at the amount of people who bit - especially when, in the case of Jordan, I
was so obviously blatant about who I was addressing my reply to (in fact,
I usually named him!) - but still, folks only saw what they wanted, and
started in I was anti-Jordan. I simply rode with it. As I did Bird and
Mario.
jD
|
29.1574 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:08 | 6 |
| Denny -
Hey, if I never named him - then how did folks know who I was talking about?
He
must be the greatest ever - that proves it! [isfh]
JD
|
29.1575 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:08 | 5 |
|
Hey guys, lay off JD. Can't you understand his pname? It says "I wish
to bore whoever I chosse." He's just chosen this notes file.
Brews
|
29.1576 | M Air Brooks, Charlie Partee, all Celts' fans... love it! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:09 | 10 |
|
Aw, lay off JD. He's only serving to underline the fact that Clemens
is the greatest pitcher in the game today, and unless you were a
Dodgers' fan when Koufax was pitching, or a Cardinals' fan with Gibson,
or a Mets' fan with Seaver, you haven't seen anyone better in the last
30 years. Otherwise, he wouldn't be receiving so much attention.
Signed,
Roger's most adoring, over-exuberant fan...
|
29.1577 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:49 | 6 |
| �Did I ever, ever, ever say that Kimball was right?
So, you're going to start playing T type games. You chose the words to
illicit a reaction. You never stated what you thought about the
incident until you had your fun chuckling over the repercussions of
those words.
|
29.1578 | Kimball's article was a non sequitor | LUNER::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Mon Jul 20 1992 17:38 | 10 |
| re .1536
JD, I'd have lost it as well. Maybe it wasn't spontaneous, but
Kimball's article wasn't either. I'm no worshipper of Clemens, but that
'article' was a hatchet job of the lowest order, and he wasn't even
competent enough to be subtle about it.
Good for Clemens.
Doc
|
29.1579 | | FDCV06::KING | | Tue Jul 21 1992 09:58 | 3 |
| JD.. GREAT spin control....
REK
|
29.1580 | Learning a lesson from Rice? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:23 | 4 |
| Wade Boggs says that one of the reasons for his subpar performance this
year is that he's not picking up the ball well out of the pitcher's
hand. He was fitted for glasses last week. He hasn't worn them yet
but went 0-fer last night, so it just might be a matter of time.
|
29.1581 | Call me skeptical, he was 3 fer on Sunday | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:26 | 1 |
|
|
29.1582 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:29 | 1 |
| correction...........he was 4-fer on Sunday!!
|
29.1583 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:46 | 9 |
|
First it was the contract negotiations that were at the root
of his hitting woes. Now, it's his vision. What's he going to
blame it on if he gets glasses and he still isn't hitting ? Cer-
tainly not his deteriorating skills. No, he'll probably blame
it on the world wide turmoil and his concerns for his fellow
man.
|
29.1584 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | why does Led Zep bore these days? | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:00 | 7 |
|
Anybody else know someone who's 20-20 and needs glasses? I don't. I thought
20-20 was just right. Boggs was reported to be 20-15 a few years ago. Doesn't
seem to me that going from better than perfect to perfect vision would effect
anybody Wade.....
Next thing you know he'll be Oprah pinning for Margo....
|
29.1585 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:09 | 3 |
| I think it's the stoopid sunglasses he was wearing at the beginning
of the year!
Denny
|
29.1586 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:17 | 6 |
|
Since he gave up his extramarital affairs something seems to be causing
him to go blind.
Dickstah
|
29.1587 | | CTHQ4::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:21 | 7 |
| re
.1586 - rooollllward Dickstah
Actually, I've worn glasses/contact lenses for, oh, 20 years, and always
thought that your vision cannot be corrected to be better than 20-20. Something
about your cornea adjusting. Maybe these glasses are a palcebo for Boggs.
=Bob=
|
29.1588 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:38 | 15 |
|
20-20 is *not* perfect vision. It only means something about being
able to read 20-point letters at 20 feet, or something like that. For
a normal person, if you have 20-20 vision, the doctor's not going to
bother to give you a prescription, but 20-20 is not even good vision,
really. Most corrected vision is better than that.
Hey, it's still an excuse, but you can't knock Wade for inconsistency.
Wade was telling tall stories and using the same silly superstitions back
when he was hitting .365. Like with Rickey Henderson, Boggs just does
not fit that prototypical profile of an athlete. He dances to a
different drummer, no question about it...
glenn
|
29.1589 | He has incident to prove it! | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:47 | 6 |
| Well if he was wearing glasses a few years ago, he wouldn't fallen
out of his wife's truck. Wif glasses, he woulda grabbed the seat belt
rather than the door handle.
I truly believe him ( right)
|
29.1590 | Yellow journalism at its worst... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:58 | 20 |
|
I got a chance to hear "the lowlife" himself on the radio last evening
and he actually had the gall to claim that he only decided to air the
woman's story in the first place because it contradicted Clemens'
previously stated "autograph policy", and that under close examination
he really never came out and wrote that Clemens knowingly denied an
autograph to a sick child. Yeah, right. I don't know about you guys,
but I lie awake at nights worrying about the ongoing saga of the
ballplayers' ever-changing autograph policies. Maybe even enough to
buy the Herald. They're providing a public service, almost.
It's amazing how far some of these "journalists" and their "editor" will
bend the truth and still expect a gullible public to buy into it.
Sickening, really, considering how even after being cold-busted by their
peers they continue to try to turn the tables by presenting a totally
irrelevant defense like Clemens didn't even read the article, or was too
stupid to understand what it meant, etc...
glenn
|
29.1591 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:00 | 21 |
|
>> Hey, it's still an excuse, but you can't knock Wade for inconsistency.
Again, first he blamed his problems on management now it's his vision.
If'n that ain't inconsistent...
>> Wade was telling tall stories and using the same silly superstitions
>> back when he was hitting .365.
There's a rather large difference between superstitions and flat out
lame excuses. His numbers have been dropping steadily for a few years
now - a rather tough thing to take for a numbers hanger.
>> Like with Rickey Henderson, Boggs just does not fit that prototypical
>> profile of an athlete. He dances to a different drummer, no question
>> about it...
Can't ever remember hearing Rickey make these kinds of pathetic excuses
or ever seeing Boggs carry a team. The only thing these two have in com-
mon are humongous egos and only one of them is justified.
|
29.1592 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:22 | 26 |
| � There's a rather large difference between superstitions and flat out
� lame excuses.
The "I have trouble concentrating because of a contract dispute" excuse
has been around a long time. Why when Rice was allegedly having vision
problems did it seem a plausible excuse, but with Wade it's lame?
�His numbers have been dropping steadily for a few years
� now - a rather tough thing to take for a numbers hanger.
Actually, Wade bounced back last year.
� Can't ever remember hearing Rickey make these kinds of pathetic excuses
� or ever seeing Boggs carry a team. The only thing these two have in com-
� mon are humongous egos and only one of them is justified.
Wrong on most counts, Tommy. Rickey comes up with these mysterious
hamstring pulls everytime he wants to pout about not being appreciated.
Wade and Rickey have another thing in common, when in their primes,
they were the two most effective leadoff men in baseball. Wade
produced as many or more runs than Rickey in some of those years
without the benefit of the stolen base in his arsenal.
"Carry a team" is one of those touchy-feely expressions that never
seems to have a well thought out definition, especially in baseball.
Kind of like "big game" and "clutch hitter".
|
29.1593 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:26 | 19 |
|
Well, I disagree, Tommy; while I don't think that Boggs is quite the
player that Henderson is, he had a career .345 BA/.435 OBP going into
this season, his numbers had only "steadily dropped" to .332 BA/.421
OBP as of just last season, and he will be going to the Hall of Fame
someday, you can count on it.
Yes, the excuses are lame, absolutely. You don't have to like Wade
Boggs, nobody does, but the ego analogy to Henderson is there. Just
last spring Rickey Henderson was directly quoted that he couldn't
perform with the thought of being underpaid in his head, as had
happened in his last year with the Yankees (his words, not mine). He
then proceeded to have an "off" year by his standards, and looks to be
following that up this year. His statement, with an underlying threat
implied, was almost *exactly* the same as the one that you criticized
Boggs for earlier.
glenn
|
29.1594 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:47 | 6 |
|
What Wade's vision problems really boil down to is "I can't see playing
for the Red Sox next year."
Dickstah
|
29.1595 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:50 | 18 |
|
>> The "I have trouble concentrating because of a contract dispute" excuse
>> has been around a long time. Why when Rice was allegedly having vision
>> problems did it seem a plausible excuse, but with Wade it's lame?
Did I ever say it was a plausible excuse for Rice ? It might have been
a plausible excuse for Boggs if it had been the first excuse but it just
the latest in what is sure to be a long line of 'em.
>> "Carry a team" is one of those touchy-feely expressions that never
>> seems to have a well thought out definition, especially in baseball.
>> Kind of like "big game" and "clutch hitter".
For a more thorough explanation of "Carrying a team" see Yastremski, Carl
circa 1967. It's not surprising though Macadoo that being a Boggs defender
you not familiar with the phrases 'big game', 'clutch hitter' and 'carrying
a team'.
|
29.1596 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:58 | 31 |
| � Did I ever say it was a plausible excuse for Rice ?
I don't know, but you weren't the only one questioning Boggs'
reasoning. Rice was highly criticized because he allegedly wouldn't
admit he needed glasses. His "lame excuses" were that regular glasses
would hinder more than help and he couldn't wear contacts due to severe
discomfort.
�It might have been
� a plausible excuse for Boggs if it had been the first excuse but it just
� the latest in what is sure to be a long line of 'em.
Establishing trends based on two comments in the press is dangerous.
� For a more thorough explanation of "Carrying a team" see Yastremski, Carl
� circa 1967.
So, when did Rickey carry a team?
�It's not surprising though Macadoo that being a Boggs defender
� you not familiar with the phrases 'big game', 'clutch hitter' and 'carrying
� a team'.
One of Wade's biggest downfalls in the end may be his consistency. He
has never elevated his game to the point where people could use these
fuzzy phrases to describe him because his game was/is a constant high
plateau. Look at his BA with runners in scoring position, late
innings, post season, day games, night games, etc. They are all
pretty close to his overall average. The only place inconsistency
sticks out is in some of his home & away numbers (although this year he
is hitting better on the road).
|
29.1597 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Tue Jul 21 1992 13:48 | 6 |
| Glenn, I heard Kimball on the radio last night as well, and
wholeheartedly agree. To Gerry Callahan's credit, he also publicly
trashed Kimball for the article and they share adjacent offices at the
Herald.
Mark.
|
29.1598 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | | Wed Jul 22 1992 09:42 | 6 |
|
You know it's a bad season when you switch to "Circus of the Stars" for
its superior athleticism and entertainment value.
Dickstah
|
29.1599 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Jul 22 1992 09:46 | 5 |
| And I guess you could describe Mo Vaughn's defensive exhibition lasted
night as "A Little Shop of Horrors"
Chap
|
29.1600 | real baseball | CNTROL::CHILDS | Card Carrying Libertarian | Wed Jul 22 1992 09:56 | 3 |
|
You should have watched the Braves, Dickstah....
|
29.1601 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | | Wed Jul 22 1992 10:51 | 21 |
|
True story.
Casey's Uncle Bert died last weekend, a long-time die-hard Red Sox fan.
He was, in fact, buried with a Red Sox cap, although he wasn't actually
wearing it. Aunt Edie (his wife of 65 years!) talked about how Uncle
Bert had been slipping a lot recently, but recounted how he would
become most animated when watching the games. "He'd pound his fists
on the arms of the chair and mutter 'goddam Goodwell or Greenberg' or
whatever that player's name was. He'd always be sneakin' off when we
had company over and I knew I'd find him in the parlor watching the
game."
Uncle Bert was 19 years old when the Sox last won the pennant, and I'm
sorry I never got the chance to talk to him about it. I hope I live
long enough to see it someday so I can meet him again and compare
notes.
Dickstah
|
29.1602 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | | Wed Jul 22 1992 10:55 | 8 |
|
Correction:
> Uncle Bert was 19 years old when the Sox last won the pennant, and I'm
^^^^^^^
Should read "Enchilada"
|
29.1603 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jul 22 1992 11:29 | 8 |
| Nice touch burying him with the hat Dickstah. My Grandfather was an
avid poker player. We put a deck a cards in his pocket right before
they closed the casket. He always wore a Red Auerbach-like loud sport
coat, even if he had to go to the store for a loaf of bread. When the
undertaker asked my grandmother for clothes to dress him in, she gave
him a dark suit. He (undertaker) said "no way! he never wore anything
like that." They put hin in his most outrageous jacket.
Denny
|
29.1604 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | | Wed Jul 22 1992 11:36 | 6 |
|
I guess they didn't put the hat on him so he wouldn't be confused with
Matt Young.
Dickstah
|
29.1605 | | CAMONE::WAY | Just 33 and I don' mind dyin' | Wed Jul 22 1992 11:38 | 11 |
| > I guess they didn't put the hat on him so he wouldn't be confused with
> Matt Young.
>
> Dickstah
Cold, man, totally cold.....
8^)
|
29.1606 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Jul 22 1992 12:35 | 10 |
| �< Note 29.1605 by CAMONE::WAY "Just 33 and I don' mind dyin'" >
�Cold, man, totally cold.....
So was Casey's Uncle Bert, who should not be confused with Uncle Bert
Humperdink.
Chap
|
29.1607 | Good for Uncle Bert, Dickstah! May he RIP! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jul 22 1992 12:35 | 1 |
|
|
29.1608 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RIP Howard Stern | Wed Jul 22 1992 12:59 | 6 |
| You know if I was Nissen or some other bread maker, I would
ask Roger if he would do a commercial for my hamburg rolls. Hey
Dickstah at least Casey's uncle got to see those bums win a World
Series. None of us will die with that distinction.
/Don
|
29.1609 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:16 | 6 |
| /Don -
One of the stations' had a commercial on this morning (fake) with Roger
shilling for Nissan buns (They give ya the control you need...)
JD
|
29.1610 | | SASE::SZABO | Ken & me: gone fishin'! | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:40 | 14 |
| > One of the stations' had a commercial on this morning (fake) with Roger
> shilling for Nissan buns (They give ya the control you need...)
JD, that was 'BCN. Yesterday morning, they (Charles & Tank) called-up
Roger at his home and talked to him for a good 10 minutes. As the
conversation was drawing to a close, Charles axes Roger to hold on a
minute while he played a commercial (the phoney Roger Nissen bun
commercial), and afterwards, Roger was rolling!
Listening to Roger giving his views and stuff, I've got a lot of
respect for him...
Hawk
|
29.1611 | I'd sooner shut my radio off then listen to "BCN.. | CNTROL::CHILDS | Card Carrying Libertarian | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:44 | 7 |
|
> Listening to Roger giving his views and stuff, I've got a lot of
> respect for him...
It easy to give the right answers when you have a week to prepare...
|
29.1612 | I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger! | SASE::SZABO | Ken & me: gone fishin'! | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:48 | 6 |
| I dunno, Mikey. Didn't sound like anything was prepared, especially
the way Charles axes the uncanny questions which are very unlike the
usual & predictable Bob Lobel/Mike Dowling/Mike Lynch questions...
Hawk
|
29.1613 | Hawk, thought you didn't listen to BCN? | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:50 | 2 |
|
|
29.1614 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jul 22 1992 14:06 | 4 |
| Ch 4 had their company picnic lasted night. They had one a those
pitching cages set up where you get your fastball clocked by radar.
Noone could fling a hamburger roll faster than 38mph.
Denny
|
29.1615 | | XCELR8::DHAMEL | | Wed Jul 22 1992 17:18 | 8 |
|
> <<< Note 29.1612 by SASE::SZABO "Ken & me: gone fishin'!" >>>
> -< I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger! >-
You prolly wanna party with Uncle Bert, too.
8^)
|
29.1616 | | CAMONE::WAY | Just 33 and I don' mind dyin' | Wed Jul 22 1992 17:20 | 36 |
| | > <<< Note 29.1612 by SASE::SZABO "Ken & me: gone fishin'!" >>>
| > -< I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger! >-
|
| You prolly wanna party with Uncle Bert, too.
|
| 8^)
Been done already:
================================================================================
Note 20.128 The SPORTS.Joke Topic 128 of 128
CAM::WAY "She said she sure could take it if I roll" 18 lines 30-APR-1991 14:09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read this in USA Today yesterday. It's true, not a joke, but it strikes
me as hilariously funny.
In (get this) Batesville, Arkansas, a 29 year old guy was arrested by the
police for disturbing a corpse.
With the permission of the funeral home, he checked out his mother's corpse
(she had died recently) and he took her to a party that she had requested
(but never got) before she died.
Police found her at the party, with a can of beer in one hand, and an
unlit cigarette in another....
Too much!
'Saw
|
29.1617 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 22 1992 18:18 | 4 |
| It was also done in a movie with John Candy starring as a cop who fell
in love with a woman who worked at a funeral parlor. Some of his Irish
friends took a recently deceased friend out for one last round at the
local pub.
|
29.1618 | | CAMONE::WAY | Need a remedy for what's ailin' me | Thu Jul 23 1992 09:27 | 16 |
| > It was also done in a movie with John Candy starring as a cop who fell
> in love with a woman who worked at a funeral parlor. Some of his Irish
> friends took a recently deceased friend out for one last round at the
> local pub.
Yeah, funny scene.
It's the one where John Candy meets Ally Sheedy for the first time....
And it is Baseball and Sox related, because they had a picnic in
Comisky Park for their first date....
'Saw
|
29.1619 | | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 23 1992 10:30 | 10 |
| Watch it Mac,
We Irish only take the deceased to a pub if'n they still have money
in their pockets. 8^)
Speakin' of deceased, this is appropriate to the topic.
Butch finally blasted his team in public. What a sorry display by
the team.
MikeL
|
29.1620 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 23 1992 12:27 | 9 |
| What the heck happened last night anyway? Around 10 pm, Viola was
cruisin' and the Sox were up 3-0. I flipped over to HBO to watch Tales
from the Crypt. When it was over I flipped back to the game and saw
they were down 5-3! I flipped back to HBO for Dream On and then back
to the Sox in time to watch them look pathetic against Montgomery in
the top of the 9th trying to overcome a 6-4 deficit.
I heard something on the radio about a 5 run inning with 3 errors and
only 1 ball leaving the infield.
|
29.1621 | | CAMONE::WAY | Need a remedy for what's ailin' me | Thu Jul 23 1992 12:51 | 19 |
| > cruisin' and the Sox were up 3-0. I flipped over to HBO to watch Tales
> from the Crypt. When it was over I flipped back to the game and saw
> they were down 5-3! I flipped back to HBO for Dream On and then back
> to the Sox in time to watch them look pathetic against Montgomery in
> the top of the 9th trying to overcome a 6-4 deficit.
>
Tales from the Crypt was really taking place in Kansas City last night.
Poor old Uncle Bert led a rebellion from the cemetary, and the living
dead took over on the field for the Sox, but they were all a bunch of
stiffs, so they lost.
Dream On was what the Sportwriters were telling Butch afterwards.....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.1622 | A real three-ring circus, I'm afraid... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 23 1992 12:55 | 13 |
|
> What the heck happened last night anyway?
Just replay the mental tape of what happened to Hesketh Tuesday night
and you've got your answer. Rivera made a couple of diving stops look
more impressive than they really were but both times the ball trickled
away, Boggs pulled Vaughn (who really looks lost out there) off the
base on a throw, Vaughn fell asleep momentarily and the runner on third
scored when he made a throw to the wrong side of home plate,
etc...basically your run-of-the-mill Red Sox play...
glenn
|
29.1623 | | FRETZ::HEISER | the extremist | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:06 | 1 |
| ...and I thought the Angels were bad!
|
29.1624 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RIP Howard Stern | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:11 | 6 |
| Got to love that NESN SportsDesk in the morning with Amy Stone.
Right after you get the "low"down on the Sox game they immediatelty
follow it with the Blue Jays score. Like somehow we should construe
the two to be intertwined.
/Don
|
29.1625 | Everyone said they'd miss the Q | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:14 | 5 |
| �basically your run-of-the-mill Red Sox play...
Actually, the Red Sox had been playing some pretty decent defense this
season. Were they just playing above their heads are now reverting
back to normal?
|
29.1626 | Plenty of seats available real soon | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:46 | 30 |
| Don't know Mac,
They looked pathetic in that inning, even more than usual. Even Frankie
V. added to the comedy, attempting a pickoff play at second base and
no one was around. The ball sailed into center field and was even
uncatchable if Rivera had been near the bag. Simply pathetic.
Loved Hobson's post game harangue,
" I ain't taking the blame for this weak bleep bleep you guys had
to watch the last two nights. I apologize to the people in Boston
who listened to it on the radio and watched it on the television...
if they continued to watch it. They probably turned it off trying
to find the bleep Three Stooges. But I ain't gonna take the blame for
it. From this point on, for the rest of the year we're gonna find
out who belongs here and who don't and who wants to be here and
who don't. We'll find out. We've got a long homestand. We'll find
out, every day, starting when we get to the ballpark. I don't have
to explain it. You know what I mean. We try our best to prepare
the club to play major-league ball like a major-league team. Right
now we're playing like the Winter Haven Red Sox. My apologies to the
people watching it in New England. It's embarrassing."
And on NESN and the Blue Jay watch, hell, the Sox are in SIXTH
place, one % point behind the mighty Tigers and Yankees. But look
at the bright side, we're still 6 1/2 games up on the last-place
Tribe!
And we're GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG
out of first place.
MikeL
|
29.1627 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:48 | 3 |
| If I was on the Winter Haven Red Sox, I'd be pretty steamed at
Hobson!
Denny
|
29.1628 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:50 | 5 |
| Mac -
You should have watched Seinfeld. Kramer moves like a Sox base-stealer...
JD
|
29.1629 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:54 | 6 |
|
Good for Butch! I didn't know that modern day managers were allowed to
talk like that to the players any more (since Billy Martin died,
anyway). I betcha Jack Clark's mad now!
Brews
|
29.1630 | Parade in OCT!!! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:59 | 2 |
| Wade got his specs...says he cain see now!
Denny
|
29.1631 | | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:00 | 4 |
| Yea,
He can see the ball much better. But he musta seen two Mo Vaughn's
last night
|
29.1632 | Woof Woof | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:02 | 11 |
| �< Note 29.1630 by SCHOOL::RIEU "Read his lips...Know new taxes" >
� Wade got his specs...says he cain see now!
Me thinks if he would of had them a few years ago, we would have never heard
of Margo.
:-)
Chap
|
29.1633 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:03 | 4 |
| Wade axed Luis Rivera how he keeps them from fogging up. Rivera told
him to rub toothpaste on 'em. I think he oughta take them down to
Pudgy's, they'll fix 'em up for him!
Denny
|
29.1634 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:13 | 1 |
| Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field...
|
29.1635 | WHERE IS THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE? | AD::HEATH | | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:15 | 6 |
| WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE ?
I KEEP GETTING AN ERROR MESSAGE LIKE
REMOTE NODE UNKOWN
THANKS
JERRY
|
29.1636 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:15 | 1 |
| ...play the field? I thought he was happily married now!
|
29.1637 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:18 | 13 |
| re .1625:
> Actually, the Red Sox had been playing some pretty decent defense this
> season. Were they just playing above their heads are now reverting
> back to normal?
Maybe they're a decent fielding team on grass, but have problems when
they get on turf (where there's less time to react)? Even in years
where the Sox have been contenders, they've rarely done well in KC...
py
|
29.1638 | re .1635 -- read note 25.1689 | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:21 | 1 |
|
|
29.1639 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:48 | 10 |
|
>> Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field...
Mac's right, Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field. To play
the field he wears a lime green polyester leisure suit, white patent
leather shoes with real imitation gold buckles and and he wears about
half a bottle of Hai Karate.
HTH
|
29.1640 | You can only shout in the Debils(tm) note... | CAMONE::WAY | Need a remedy for what's ailin' me | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:59 | 23 |
| > <<< Note 29.1635 by AD::HEATH >>>
> -< WHERE IS THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE? >-
>
> WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE ?
> I KEEP GETTING AN ERROR MESSAGE LIKE
> REMOTE NODE UNKOWN
>
> THANKS
> JERRY
WHAT ARE YOU SHOUTING FOR JERRY!?
The node that the Red Sox notes file is on actually moved last weekend
and it has a new DECnet node ID.
First off, have your system manager update your database. Meantime,
earlier in this note, or in the Q&A note (25.*) there is a command
string you can use to set your notebook entry to allow you to access it...
hth,
'Saw
|
29.1641 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 23 1992 16:30 | 2 |
| Not quite, Tommy. I have it on good authority Wade wears cowboy boots.
He injured himself trying to take them off once, remember?
|
29.1642 | Tee-Hee | COBRA::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Mon Jul 27 1992 11:55 | 2 |
|
Wade "Mr. Magloo" Boggs went 0-4 yesterday.
|
29.1643 | forgot his night tint | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Jul 27 1992 11:58 | 1 |
|
|
29.1644 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | No mane in Spain, playin' to reign | Wed Jul 29 1992 12:57 | 6 |
|
Should be a good matchup tonight: Roger Clemens on the mound, and
Terry cooney behind the plate.
Dickstah
|
29.1645 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMass | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:14 | 4 |
| RE: Clemens and Cooney
I hope they settle their differences the gentlemenly way. With
their fists!
|
29.1646 | it ain't da shoes | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:15 | 8 |
| For those who don't like watching the pro's in the 'pics, feel
free to watch tonight's Red Sox game. I understand the team's made up
of a bunch or amateurs!
;^)
Kev
|
29.1647 | Go O's! | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:16 | 5 |
| I'm going to the Friday afternoon game -- anyone know who the scheduled
starter is for the Sox?
py
|
29.1648 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:43 | 7 |
| re: .1647
going to the Red Sox game instead of the SPORTS get together. shame,
shame, shame :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.1649 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:48 | 2 |
| He cain stop on the way home. Mac said he was too!
Denny
|
29.1650 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:50 | 9 |
| Actually TCM,
PY would probly tell you he is going to an ORIOLE game. Still no
excuse. PY, you and Waugamain owe us each a brew fer stiffing us
for the game. 8^)
MikeL
BTW TCM, it has been voted among us RedSox fans that you and JD each
us a beer for the 86 "gift". Small solace
|
29.1651 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:59 | 7 |
| re: .1650
JD and I voted that losers buy, so each of you Red Sox fans owe us a
beer. Call it even.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1652 | Phttttttttttttttt | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:03 | 1 |
|
|
29.1653 | you started it, take your lumps like a real man! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:04 | 3 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
29.1654 | Thank God you'r not a Yankthee fan. | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:06 | 1 |
|
|
29.1655 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:16 | 6 |
| Mike,
If I bought you a beer, I'd slide it down the bar to ya - but I'm afraid
it might go through yer legs.
JD
|
29.1656 | DOUBLE OUCH!! Touche, mon ami. You going? | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:18 | 1 |
|
|
29.1657 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:22 | 6 |
| Mike
At this point, I'd have to say that I am going, at least for a little
while.
JD
|
29.1658 | rooollling | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Jul 29 1992 14:25 | 4 |
| BRAVO JD! For that reply I will buy you a beer!
The Crazy Met
|
29.1659 | | SALEM::DODA | Dave > Dan | Wed Jul 29 1992 16:46 | 5 |
| Can anyone recommend a good, quiet restaurant within walking
distance of Fenway?
thanks
daryll
|
29.1660 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Jul 29 1992 16:55 | 10 |
| �Can anyone recommend a good, quiet restaurant within walking
�distance of Fenway?
There's a new Japanese restaurant, Miyako. Excellent sushi. I know you like
that. A little further away, on Comm Ave, there are two good Thai places. The
India Quality restaurant near the Rat is pretty good too. BYOB.
Also, check out note 131 in BOSTON_EATS.
j.
|
29.1661 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:04 | 8 |
| I have an extra ticket for this Friday's afternoon game. Send me mail
if you're interested.
�India Quality restaurant near the Rat is pretty good too.
I've been wanting to check that place out. I can always go for a good
curry. Noone I've been with has been adventurous, though. At least
now I can say it was recommended.
|
29.1662 | Grab one on your way out ... in the 5th inning | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:23 | 7 |
| � Can anyone recommend a good, quiet restaurant within walking distance of
� Fenway?
Try the hot dog stand in the park ??? I hear it's real quiet in there
these days.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1663 | | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:27 | 2 |
|
|
29.1664 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:28 | 5 |
| � Try the hot dog stand in the park ??? I hear it's real quiet in there
� these days.
You're hearing wrong then, Bob. The Sox are still playing to sell-out
and near-capacity crowds.
|
29.1665 | Good place to grab a tan | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:29 | 4 |
| Whoops.
Good one Bob. I imagine it's a big gabfest. "Say who's up?"
"Who cares, it's your round.".
|
29.1666 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | No mane in Spain, playin' to reign | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:29 | 5 |
|
re: .1663
Hear hear! Well said, Mike.
|
29.1667 | :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:36 | 11 |
| Oh, Mac, do I have to spell out the word "S-M-I-L-E-Y" for you ???
I know full well that Fenway is sold out. Hell, Bahstin can always
scrounge up 33,000 get-a-lifers who think somehow someway somebody like
Joe Hesketh is gonna toss a no-no. Or that Phil Plantier is gonna crush
4 dingers.
33,000 butts in the seats do not add up to a roaring throng when the BoSox
sip. More like a very large Back Bay funeral home.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1668 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:37 | 4 |
| � 33,000 butts in the seats do not add up to a roaring throng when the BoSox
� sip. More like a very large Back Bay funeral home.
You haven't heard them boo.
|
29.1669 | And watch Bawlmer win | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:43 | 17 |
| Thank you Dickstah and to expound upon that,
Mac is correct in this, as we NE'ers are well aware. The vast % of
the park is sold out for the rest of the year, and let's face it,
Fenway is a beautiful place to watch a game. Now we, well the realists,
understand that the Bosox are woefully out of it, but I'm heading to
the park on Sunday and am looking forward to it. Why? I like baseball
and what a great setting to relax, enjoy a brew or two, eat some dogs,
soak in some sun, ogle the tipsy babettes in da bleachers, observe
the bleacher shennanigans, enjoy more brews, yell at Matt Young,
ogle some more babes, enjoy a couple more brews, make fun of Billy
Hatcher as he re-enacts the Perils of Pauline in CF, enjoy a coupla
more brews, wake up, and then go home. It's FUN!
8^),
MikeL
|
29.1670 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 30 1992 09:07 | 2 |
| Forget the Socks, come on down to Foxboro for the rest a the year.
Denny
|
29.1671 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMass | Thu Jul 30 1992 10:12 | 5 |
| I suggest if you must go to a baseball game try McCoy Stadium.
The tickets are cheap, the parking is free and the quality of baseball
(AAA) is the same you get from the Red Sox.
/Don
|
29.1672 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 30 1992 10:14 | 2 |
| And the Chinese rest. across the street has great Fog Cutters!
Denny
|
29.1673 | Sox lost, but saw some great ball at Fenway last weekend | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | IfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!! | Thu Jul 30 1992 10:20 | 11 |
| > I suggest if you must go to a baseball game try McCoy Stadium.
>The tickets are cheap, the parking is free and the quality of baseball
>(AAA) is the same you get from the Red Sox.
Yahbut, at least at Fenway you get to watch the other team. The Minnysoda
games were fun to be at even though the Sox got wumped for the most part.
Sunday's game had some fine highlight film defensive plays. Baseball fans can
usually enjoy themselves at Fenway even if the Sox don't come out on top.
Scott
|
29.1674 | | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 30 1992 10:40 | 6 |
| Yo Slash,
You gittin' on the Anvilhaid express to McCoy?
Free Pearl country club dogs and soda. (Mich Dark in a Thermos?)
MikeL
|
29.1675 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:09 | 8 |
| In response to the question a ways back......I believe Matt Young is
pitching the afternoon game on Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.1676 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:18 | 4 |
| � In response to the question a ways back......I believe Matt Young is
� pitching the afternoon game on Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last night Ned/Jerry said that Darwin is pitching the afternoon game.
|
29.1677 | Better hope they score a lot | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:52 | 6 |
|
Young will most likely pitch less than one inning no matter which game
it is.
Dickstah
|
29.1678 | Did Clemens Win? | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:15 | 4 |
| What happened in lasted night's game?
Rich
|
29.1679 | 6-5 Socks | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:20 | 2 |
| Yes, he's now 11-7. Cooney gave him all the close ones too!
Denny
|
29.1680 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:24 | 5 |
| Clemens struggled a bit last night only going 6-1/3 innings. He threw
a lot of pitches (and had to warm-up twice because of an hour rain
delay), got behind alot of batters, and gave up 4 runs (2 of them on a
Sierra homer). He had a lot of strikeouts (at least 7), but certainly
wasn't at his best. Texas always seems to give him problems.
|
29.1681 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Thu Jul 30 1992 16:41 | 6 |
| If I'm not mistaken, it was a Palmero homerun....not Sierra.
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.1682 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:05 | 37 |
| Thanks, guys.......
You know, I justed got back from two weeks on Cape Cahd. Got all
excited when I discovered that the TV in our cottage had a converter
box on top. Got even more excited when I found out that the owner had
subscribed to NESN.
Thought to myself....Man, am I gonna get my fill of the Red Sox during
this vacation.
Well, after seeing that team, night after night, showing ineptitude,
carelessness I don't even see in the International League, a lack of
desire AND (something I didn't expect) - BONEHAID moves by Hobson....
Well, after a week, I didn't even care to watch them anymore and opted
to take my son to see a few Cape Cod League games.
I can understand a team losing. I can understand guys getting
outplayed. But I cannot tolerate a team that is outhustled,
out-thought, outEVERYTHING.
I sincerely hope that they are surpassed by Cleveland this year and end
up at the bottom of the heap. I think that may be the only way that
management might make the smart moves necessary to bring the team back
to respectability.
I would trade Zupcic now. He will be nothing more than a Reid
Nichols/Garry Hancock/Sam Bowen type player although he has drawn alot
of interest.
They all seem to have given up. Hobson allowed Gardiner to hang himself
and lose a game without even having anyone warming in the pen. If he is
building for next year, say so and don't delude us into thinking the
Sox have a chance this year.
Rich
|
29.1683 | What is the easy way to Fenway??? | SPEZKO::SKABO | Money talks, mine say's GOODBYE! | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:15 | 14 |
| I have tickets to Sundays game at Fenway and having never been to
Fenway (to Three Rivers and Forbs Field in Pittsburgh, many times ;*)),
I would like to know what is the best way to get to Fenway from the
north (NH) .....
o Drive to Lechmere and take the T???
o Park someplace close??? if so, where???
o Something else???
Thanks for any hints!!!
|
29.1684 | Bailiff, whack his pee pee!!!!!! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:19 | 7 |
| NOTE'S P-NAME PLAGARIZER!!!!!!!!
Jeff Needle's had that one for 4+ years!!!!!!
hth,
Kev
|
29.1685 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:25 | 9 |
| I take the Green Line in from Riverside.
Take 495 South to the Mass Pike. Take the Mass Pike to 128S. Take the
first exit, take a left at the end of the ramp, follow past the hotel
and you're at the Riverside Stop for the T. There's plenty of parking
and the train goes right to the Fenway stop. Follow the crowd to the
park (it's only a few blocks). The fare is free on the way back out if
you get on at Fenway (if you get on the train at Kenmore Square you'll
have to pay again).
|
29.1686 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:40 | 13 |
| Whoa Mac...
You're not actually asking this person to drive from NH down 495 to the
Pike are you?
Depending upon where in NH you're coming from you can take I95 to Rt. 1
to the Expressway to the Dock Square exit and park at the Government
Center garage. From there take the Green line into Kenmore Square and
the park. Or you can take I93 to the Expressway and do the same. Or
you can take Rt. 3 in to 128S and take the Riverside Green line into
Kenmore Square. Riverside is in Newton.
Mark.
|
29.1687 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 30 1992 18:00 | 4 |
| � You're not actually asking this person to drive from NH down 495 to the
� Pike are you?
Why not? That's how I get to New Hampshire ;^)
|
29.1688 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Jul 31 1992 00:15 | 5 |
| Just park on Beacon Street in Brookline, a few blocks past Park Drive (where
the meters are 10 hours) and either walk (20 minutes) or hop the green line for
two stops to Kenmore.
j.
|
29.1689 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMass | Fri Jul 31 1992 09:37 | 4 |
| Better yet try to sell your tickets and spend the money on
something more worthwhile than the Red Sox.
/Don
|
29.1690 | Where is the fan enthusiasm??? | SPEZKO::SKABO | Money talks, mine say's GOODBYE! | Mon Aug 03 1992 12:46 | 31 |
|
Well, I went to my first Boston Red Sox game on Sunday at Fenway...
It took some time for me to want to go to an American league game, but I did
Love the old ball park, as it reminded me of the old Forbes Field in
Pittsburgh. The old classic field's (not many left) have so much to offer.
Being close to the field, as not being miles away like the new super ball
fields (Three Rivers, Riverfront... etc). But missing from Fenway was the fan
spirit and fan enthusiasm. No wonder the Blow Sox are doing so poorly, if
only the fan's and the Fenway keepers, would show some real support.... Some
of the examples would be (as I have been to Pittsburgh games many times) that
the organist should lead the crowd (34K yesterday) to cheers and chanting but
instead, the only signs of life at Fenway was the people in the bleacher
section passing a beach ball back and forth as the game was very boring... The
fans did try to do a WAVE, but it sort of died out most of the time 1/3 around
the field (it did make it around once, guess they woke up!). The organist did
play when the game was over (if you can call it that). In Pittsburgh, as most
other ball parks (?), lots of chants, air horns and the score board even
starts the people into cheers, this is what is needed to help entice the home
team, that the fans want them WIN!!!
This is only my opinion, but would like to see more Fenway support....
Go Bucs!!!! Would love to see them play the Red Sox sometime in October!!!
btw: (-reply a few notes about parking) I parked at Leachmere for $2.50 and
took the MBTA ($1.70) to Kenmore Sq. - No problems getting in/out of the city..
easy for me coming down I-93.
|
29.1691 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Mon Aug 03 1992 12:52 | 5 |
|
Fan enthusiasm? It went south with the *team's* enthusiasm.
Dickstah
|
29.1692 | | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:00 | 4 |
| Apparently most of what you want to see at a ballpark is what most
folks around here want to see kept out of Fenway -- the Wave, stupid
things on the scoreboard, organists/scoreboard operators telling the
fans when they should be cheering, etc.
|
29.1693 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:10 | 3 |
| Dickstah's right, daid teams get daid fans! The only reason anyone
shows up is because they bought tickets 6 months ago.
Denny
|
29.1694 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMass | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:27 | 5 |
| The same nameless, faceless suits who go to the Celtic games
now go to Red Sox games too. Corporate America's been daid for
years.
/Don
|
29.1695 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:46 | 4 |
| Air horns? The wave? Beachballs as a "sign of life"? Organists telling
people when to cheer?
You've got to be kidding.
|
29.1696 | It's the team; give it a year or two and try again... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:52 | 14 |
|
> The same nameless, faceless suits who go to the Celtic games
> now go to Red Sox games too. Corporate America's been daid for
> years.
I don't see too many suit-types out in the bleachers, though, and even
they're dead. This Sox team is the most uninspiring I've ever
followed. The contrast in fan response to marginally successful
teams like 1990 and 1988, or even teams that hung in there for a while
like 1991 and 1989, is huge. And of course 1986 was one summer-long
party out in the cheap seats, many great games and much enthusiasm...
glenn
|
29.1697 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMass | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:04 | 5 |
| Glenn, take a look at who owns the lower box seats. Back in
the 70's you could get great seats without having to shell out the
dough for a season ticket.
/Don
|
29.1698 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:12 | 10 |
| See, Red Sox fans are the most knowledgeable in the world. They are so
knowledgeable that the don't *need* to cheer or show enthusiasm.
They simply think of it, and it happens. Silently. But if you look around,
you can see smirks and smiles on faces, and knowing nods as they go absolutely
bonkers inside, yet remain stoic on the outside. They are the M&M's of fandom.
HTH.
JD
|
29.1699 | | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:21 | 16 |
| Nope. It ain't that.
It's just that the Sox are mired in that no-man's land between being
marginally able to contend, and being so horrendously bad that the
fans could get into them being so bad (cf. New Orleans Saints fans
in the early years).
Right now they just suck. So who gives a hoo-hah about the organist
whipping up the fans. Or the scoreboard doing dweeby things. Or the
Wave. (The wave actually died three years ago, but some stupid fans won't
let the corpse rest in peace).
When the Sox give us something to cheer about, we'll cheer....
'Saw
|
29.1700 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:29 | 47 |
| DOn't listen to Saw. He's just spouting Red Sox Fan hoooo-haaaa.
Here's the translation:
>> -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
Z================================================================================
>Note 29.1699 The Boston Red Sox Note 1699 of 1699
>CAMONE::WAY "There are monkey boys in the facility" 16 lines 3-AUG-1992 13:21
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Nope. It ain't that.
Yep. It is that. Fellow Sox fans know that by not saying something, one means
exactly that.
>It's just that the Sox are mired in that no-man's land between being
>marginally able to contend, and being so horrendously bad that the
>fans could get into them being so bad (cf. New Orleans Saints fans
>in the early years).
The Sox are a bunch of lunch pail guys give their all, but just are falling
on tough luck. Our undying fan support is testament to the legacy of close
misses by underachieving happy-go-lucky teams. We fans support them through it
all.
>>whipping up the fans. Or the scoreboard doing dweeby things. Or the
>Wave. (The wave actually died three years ago, but some stupid fans won't
>let the corpse rest in peace).
We'd love to have car races on the scoreboard, but by not having them, we retain
a link to our past, namely, to anal-rentitive pilgrims who were so stupid they
came to this country without a clue on how to feed themselves. Everyone knows
Pilgrim is an Indian word for "Dumb Turd"
>When the Sox give us something to cheer about, we'll cheer....
We cheer on the inside. Shows of emotion are for intellectually barren
yokels from Iowa.
>'Saw
>
"Frank"
Hope that helped. ;-) JD
|
29.1701 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:48 | 24 |
| So, JD, you prefer auto races on the scoreboard and someone with a
keyboard in front of him to give you a clue as to when to start to
cheer?
Don't you give YOURSELF enough credit to KNOW when to cheer? Don't you
wonder, sometimes, why there is not an organist cueing us when to boo
when the circumstance requires such a response?
I've been to too many stadiums where people will munch on their hot
dogs and swill their beer, hear someone say, "Hey, Merle, thar's that
cute little rooster in a <TEAM_NAME> outfit. He wants us to say, Yeah!"
And old Merle drops his hot dog and spills his beer 'cause he is
conditioned to cheer when some ridiculous man in chicken suit is
exhorting him.
Red Sox fans can be some of the loudest and vocally supportive in all
of baseball - provided the team is giving it's all. Just like fans in
St. Louis, Chicago and Philadelphia.
Bottom line: We don need no steenkin' car races on the scoreboard and
an organist to lead us in cheers.
Rich
|
29.1702 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Aug 03 1992 14:50 | 8 |
| Rich,
Though I left out the smiley's, I hoped they were inferred. I'm a Sox fan too,
remember.
Ask me sometime about how much I 'enjoyed' going to the Kingdome....
JD
|
29.1703 | | DECWET::METZGER | Mmmmmmm, Doughnuts. | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:10 | 7 |
|
You lived for the hydroboat races on the big screen JD
:-)
Metz
|
29.1704 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:11 | 9 |
| Metz,
I did enjoy the 'Bil and Ted' short during the first game..
"Dust, Wind, Dude"
;-)
JD
|
29.1705 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:15 | 4 |
| Sorry, JD - Shoulda known better.
Rich
|
29.1706 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:25 | 14 |
|
> Glenn, take a look at who owns the lower box seats. Back in
> the 70's you could get great seats without having to shell out the
> dough for a season ticket.
Hey, I agree with you. But the difference between the Celtics and the
Red Sox is that you can still occasionally get a ticket to a Red Sox
game, it might even be a reasonably decent one and it won't necessarily
cost you an arm and a leg. Red Sox management might have invented the
fan rip-off, but the Celtics have perfected, patented, and franchised
it...
glenn
|
29.1707 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:46 | 10 |
| Rich -
No problem.
JD
BTW: regarding this year's red sox. This team doesn't even have an
interesting characters. No off-the-wall types to make this aweful year
just a tad better - you know, no Bill Lee or Bernie Carbo or even an Oil
Can - no quotable quotes....sigh
|
29.1708 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Tue Aug 04 1992 07:38 | 4 |
| Billy Hatcher steals Home last night, first time a Sox player has done
that in 19 years!!!111 (<- In memory of the dINZ)
lEe
|
29.1709 | | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Tue Aug 04 1992 09:31 | 7 |
| > Billy Hatcher steals Home last night, first time a Sox player has done
> that in 19 years!!!111 (<- In memory of the dINZ)
Who was the last guy to do it, and when?
'Saw
|
29.1710 | Marty | MCIS2::MCDONNELL | | Tue Aug 04 1992 09:35 | 1 |
| Marty Barrett 1988
|
29.1711 | WHAT a jump!!!!! | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Time to change the P-Name | Tue Aug 04 1992 09:36 | 6 |
|
Maybe it's the last time a Sox player has done it at Fenway in 19
years.. but, I don't think Jody Reed has been with the team, quite that
long. Jody was the last Red Sox player to do it.
/Jeff
|
29.1712 | | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Tue Aug 04 1992 10:10 | 10 |
| > Maybe it's the last time a Sox player has done it at Fenway in 19
> years.. but, I don't think Jody Reed has been with the team, quite that
> long. Jody was the last Red Sox player to do it.
The last time I saw anyone steal home in a game I was watching, was
Tommy Agee with the Mets, in the early 70s (or perhaps it was 1969, I'm
not sure).....
'Saw
|
29.1713 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 04 1992 10:56 | 7 |
| Jody Reed was not the last player to steal home. According to both the
Globe and the telecast last night, Marty Barrett did it in 1988 and
Tommy Harper did it sometime in his career. Both of those were on the
road so this was the first steal of home in Fenway in who knows how
long.
John
|
29.1714 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Barkley for Foreign Ambassador | Tue Aug 04 1992 11:05 | 14 |
|
> road so this was the first steal of home in Fenway in who knows how
> long.
Must be park effects.
Hatcher had it in the bag as soon as the catcher jumped in front of the
plate while the pitch was on the way. Good thing the batter didn't
swing to try to protect the runner, or else the catcher would still be
seeing birdies today while nursing a_aig on the back of his haid.
Dickstah
|
29.1715 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 04 1992 11:13 | 10 |
|
Technically, Jody Reed may have been the last Sox to steal home as both
the Barrett/Harper instances referred to straight steals, and the
steal of home on the front end of a double steal is relatively
commonplace, even for the Red Sox. The problem the researchers run
into is that the scoring rules make no differentiation for a "straight"
steal, so they have to work from memory or newspaper accounts, etc.
glenn
|
29.1716 | Mind ain't workin' yet this week. | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Time to change the P-Name | Tue Aug 04 1992 14:59 | 6 |
|
I probably heard Barrett and thought Reed.. you know how easy it is to
get 2nd basemen confused.
/Jeff
|
29.1717 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | A legend in six decades | Mon Aug 10 1992 09:44 | 12 |
|
Jack Clark filed for personal bankruptcy this weekend. Assets of
around $4 mil and debts of $11 mil. He apparently owes a lot on his
classic car collection, and lost a bundle on some racing team he had a
hand in.
Hard to believe how much dough this guy has made in the last ten years
or so, and he winds up in debt. I wonder if he has some kind of
gambling problem?
Dickstah
|
29.1718 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Aug 10 1992 12:17 | 8 |
| Ya know there ain't much positive to say about the Yankees and the
Yankee fans but.......
I was rollin' bigtime when I heard the fans serenadin' Flat-Broke Jack
by waving dollar bills when he came to the plate.
MikeL
|
29.1719 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Aug 10 1992 12:56 | 2 |
| Yeah, but it it was Sox fans, JD'd be in here saying how mean and
inconsiderate they are.
|
29.1720 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Jack Clark: Will DH for food | Tue Aug 11 1992 10:15 | 8 |
|
Jeff Rearend, the closer (pronounced as in "We're closer to the bottom
of the league than the top") did it again with a walk, followed by a
homerun trot. I don't wanna see his name on the roster at the end of
this week, let alone next spring.
Dickstah
|
29.1721 | Unbelievable error by Mo. What concentration? | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 11 1992 10:27 | 1 |
|
|
29.1722 | Tribe: Team of the mid to late '90s | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Time to change the P-Name | Tue Aug 11 1992 10:29 | 7 |
|
Gotta love Carlos Baerga.. the definte "sleeper" in the trade that
sent Carter to SD for Alomar, James and Carlos. Sure looks like a
sweet deal now, don't it! Best thing is that Baerga is only 22, Alomar
is only 25.
/Jeff
|
29.1723 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:29 | 25 |
|
Well, ole Wade went 0 for 5 last night and is now batting a
whopping .264, which might not be so bad if he didn't also have
fewer homers than teammate Ellis Burks who has been out since
before Father Porter surpassed George Bush in favorability
ratings. What's worse from a Boggsian standpoint is that Wade,
he of the mighty ego, seems to have lost his confidence. A
swing and a miss by Boggs which used to be a rare occurence is
becoming increasingly less so, as are pops ups. Could it be that
someone has hung a garland of kryptonite around the neck of our
hero? Has Wade "I never met a mirror I didn't like" Boggs picked
the worse possible year to have a really bad one ? Given his age
there's a very good chance that this may be the last baseball con-
tract Boggs ever negotiates and with every 0-5 game as the season
progresses a whole lot of dollars are subtracted. If a bidding war,
or more likely a skirmish, were to erupt are the Sox willing to join
the fray ? Not likely, which of course would be fine by me and that's
why I'm hoping this season has a lot more 0-5 games in store for Wade
because it won't be enough for me to just see him go, I'd also like
to see him go on a real down note. Bye Wade, you won't be missed.
|
29.1724 | Judging from the "R" column... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:36 | 7 |
|
> Bye Wade, you won't be missed.
I'm afraid that the old Wade is already sorely missed...
glenn
|
29.1725 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:37 | 5 |
| He's also slumping in the field. He committed his 14th error of the
season last night and leads the Sox in this category.
What is it with Sox players lately that they have such a precipitous
decline? Rice, Clark, Boggs...
|
29.1726 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Tue Aug 11 1992 13:08 | 5 |
| Mac -
They haven't really declined fast. It's just the inflated hype of SOx fans
and the press that built them up... ;-O ~/~
JD
|
29.1727 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 11 1992 13:25 | 6 |
| �They haven't really declined fast. It's just the inflated hype of SOx fans
�and the press that built them up... ;-O ~/~
Yeah, right. The fans and press just made up those MVP-esque years of
Rice. They also made up those 30 HR years of Jack Clark. They also
made up that .360 lifetime BA for Boggs.
|
29.1728 | You'll never learn Mac. (-: | SHARE::DERRY | Take your time...hurry up. | Tue Aug 11 1992 14:08 | 1 |
|
|
29.1729 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Tue Aug 11 1992 14:11 | 12 |
|
I don't know about Clark but Rice reminded me of a shot fighter
towards the end. His skills disappeared almost overnight and every-
one could see it but Rice himself. He went from one of the most
feared hitters in baseball to an almost automatic out, often an
automatic two. He grasped at straws by adjusting his stance and
swing, getting glasses but you can't turn a hamburger back into a
prize bull. Boggs seems to be heading down the same path. He never
used to get cheated during an at bat but now it's becoming a regular
thing.
|
29.1730 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Tue Aug 11 1992 14:47 | 4 |
| All I know is that Rice IMHO never should've been MVP in 1978. What an
injustice!
Bob "WILDCAT" Roper
|
29.1731 | Rice deserved it in '78 | SALES::THILL | | Tue Aug 11 1992 15:07 | 5 |
| -1 Why is that? Say what you want about Rice, but in '78 he had an
outstanding year. I dont remember his stats exactly, but I think it was
as close to a triple-crown year as anyone has come in recent years.
Tom
|
29.1732 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 11 1992 15:30 | 4 |
| He's probably a Yankee fan who's miffed that Rice won it over Guidry.
In the end I think it came down to a decision of everyday player vs.
pitcher. Both had outstanding years.
|
29.1733 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:04 | 5 |
| And I am sure that .1730 would then conclude that Clemens did indeed
deserve it over Mattingly in 1986 :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.1734 | Mattingly > Clemens in 1986! | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:44 | 14 |
| re - 1) Please don't get me started on 1986!!!
re .1732
>>He's probably a Yankee fan who's miffed that Rice won it over Guidry.
Mac, you nailed that one! I was a big Yankee fan in '78. You're right,
both players had superb seasons. Guidry however had a "Magical"
season. One that will certainly be hard to match. If memory serves,
Guidry was 25-3 with a 1.78 ERA. I'd be interested in seeing Rice's
numbers again, but I suspect that those numbers have already been
matched or bettered since 1978.
Bob "WILDCAT" Roper
|
29.1735 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:50 | 5 |
| Will someone post the numbers for Rice and Guidry in 1978 and
Clemens and Mattingly in 1986?
The Crazy Met
|
29.1736 | Some rotisserie player could say for sure... | SALES::THILL | | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:04 | 2 |
| I may be wrong, but somehow I remember Rice having about 35 HR, 110 RBI
and a BA of about .305. Not too shabby.
|
29.1737 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:25 | 7 |
|
78 Rice 46 hr's 139 ribbies .315
78 Guidry 25-3 1.74 Era.
86 Clemens 24-4 2.48 Era.
86 Donbo .352 31 HR's 113 Ribbies 53 Doubles
|
29.1738 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:27 | 4 |
|
Fisk > Munson
Brews
|
29.1739 | A vote for Jim Rice | POWDML::HEIER | | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:29 | 16 |
| The previous note is somewhat wrong. Rice had a pretty remarkable
year. He batted about .325 with 46 HR and I believe 125 RBI. I
know players such as Fielder and Canseco have matched the HR and RBI
but no power hitter since has matched those two stats with such a high
on base percentage. Also I do believe he had 406 total bases that year
with over 200 hits also.
I'd have to say that was the most amazing offensive season in the past
15 years or so. Imagine how much salary he would have commanded today;
perhaps eight million dollars a year.
Guidry's statistics are correct. 25 wins, 3 losses, 1.78 era. But
remember that at that time, there was a great relunctance to vote
a starting pitcher as MVP.
Larry
|
29.1740 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:30 | 10 |
| re: .1737
Thanks. Looks like a real tossup in both years.
The Crazy Met
ps Now I am sure a Yankee fan will complain about anti-Yankee sentiment
in the media. Actually can the media really be blamed for that :-)
|
29.1741 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:31 | 5 |
| When the standards of how voting is done seem to change at a whim every
year and with an inability to decide just what a Most Valuable Player
is, this is an issue not worth getting excited about.
John
|
29.1742 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:33 | 6 |
|
And don't forget that in '78 the Sox and Yeankees ended up with the
same record 8^(, whereas in '86 the Yankees finished behind the Sox.
Brews
|
29.1743 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:33 | 10 |
| Also keep in mind that in 1978 the Sox and the Yanks finished tied for
first. In 1986 Mattingly played for an also ran.
Think about the word "valuable" and it's meaning. Guidry and Rice
arguable carried their teams to first place (and thus a good case could
be made for either player). I think Rice won out because he was out
there everyday instead of every 5th day. Take Clemens out of the Sox
rotation in 1986 and they would have been a mediocre team instead of a
pennant winning team. Take Mattingly off the 1986 Yankees and they
still would have been a mediocre team.
|
29.1744 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:42 | 7 |
| Ahhh, 1978. For a Yankee fan, it didn't get any better.
There was a player for the Yanks other than Guidry who had an
incredible August. IMO, this player gave the team a monumental lift
that summer. Can you name this player?
Bob Roper
|
29.1745 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:42 | 13 |
| re: .1743
Good point.
But, the real problem is that the writers have never decided what
"valuable" really means. Dawson in 1987 had a phenomenal season but the
Cubs still finished in last place. When Foster won for the Reds he had great
stats but the Reds had such a good team they would have easily
contended without him. And I am sure we could find many more examples
one way or the other.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1746 | Munson >Bench>Fisk...... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Wed Aug 12 1992 09:38 | 10 |
|
Re-2 August???????????????
I know who had a great October(especially Oct. 5th)
The BUCKSTER.......
|
29.1747 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 12 1992 09:43 | 32 |
| I went back and reread Bill James discussing the various MVP awards.
In the case of Mattingly vs Clemens, using his different formulae, he
felt Clemens made more of a contribution to the Sox than Mattingly made
to the Yankees. In 1978, he felt the contributions of both Guidry and
Rice were mathematically equal but since the Yankees won the pennant,
Guidry deserved the award.
It can be argued since after 162 games there was no pennant winner,
Bucky Dent actually deserved the MVP since he made the leading
contribution to the pennant being won. :-)
I still think, however, since this award has never defined itself it's
pointless to argue about who wins in a given year. Should it be the
player with the best stats regardless of how his team does? Should it
be the best player on a championship team? Is it the most
indispensible player (ie, remove player A from Team B and they hit rock
bottom)? Then, the standard has to be applied consistently year after
year for the award to have any true meaning.
I don't know what the standard for MVP should be. My standard for
Coach/Manager of the Year is Coach/Manager of the Championship Team,
and this disagrees with the defacto standard that says the award
generally goes to the Coach/Manager of the most improved team, or team
that outdid preseason expectations.
While Glenn Waugaman disagrees with me, I feel College All-Americans
should be chosen based on NFL Draft order and the Heisman Trophy should
go to the player first drafted by the NFL.
None of these issues causes me to lose sleep.
John
|
29.1748 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Wed Aug 12 1992 10:22 | 13 |
|
I thought that there should have been duo Mvp awards in 86.
Clemens pitched great all year and Mattingly was the 1st American
Leaguer in the history of baseball to collect 230 hits 100 + ribbies
and 30 + homers in a single season. Not too mention if the batting
Champ that year(His name eludes me) didn't have a mysterious injury for
the last 4 games of that season he probably would have won the Batting
title.
But Clemens got the award and it was much deserved and seeing
Mattingly won it in 85 anyways it wasn't too hard of a pill to swallow
for us Yankee fans.
|
29.1749 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Jack Clark: Will DH for food | Wed Aug 12 1992 11:27 | 6 |
|
The QE2 and Jack Clark both hit rock bottom this week. Guess which one
is cheaper to bail out and keep afloat?
Dickstah
|
29.1750 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Wed Aug 12 1992 11:46 | 7 |
|
Wohhhhhhhhh
Dickstah your p-name toooooo funny.
|
29.1751 | Hot August '78 Munson? | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:32 | 1 |
|
|
29.1752 | mebbe should be in my collection? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Aug 12 1992 23:18 | 10 |
| Gotta laugh about the WEEE EEEEE EYE broadcasters!
They're pushing everybody to buy Indian BBall Hats as a sign of
displeasure and force "manglement" to make the team better!
guffaw, guffaw
I remain,
a disinterested Bayseball kinda guy!
Kev
|
29.1753 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:01 | 8 |
| Heard this the other morning on the radio:
Butch Hobson wanted to put Jack Clark at first for last night's game,
but couldn't because Clark had a sore arm.
Seems the arm was hit by the lid of a Salvation Army clothes container.
Lee
|
29.1754 | So... have they hit bottom yet? | SHARE::DERRY | I think ya hear me knockin'... | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:07 | 1 |
|
|
29.1755 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:43 | 3 |
| 1/2 a gong out and falling. Hope they end up there, might be the end
for ol' Lou!
Denny
|
29.1756 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Jack Clark: Will DH for food | Thu Aug 13 1992 10:21 | 18 |
|
Yup, they could be in sole possession of the cellar as early as
tonight. Whoop-dee-freakin-doo!
Whooda thunk that a team with Clemens and Viola could be that close to
being the worst team in baseball? ERA-wise, they're still at or very
near the top of the league. Offensively, they're at or near the bottom
in runs produced, batting average, on-base percentage, steals, doubles,
singles, triples, homers, and just about every other category which
causes or contributes to a win. And with what they have down on the
farm, the rebuilding process looks bleak. It'll take a miracle worker
to put together enough trades and acquisitions to contend, and that
should be just about the time the pitching is all washed up. Lou
Gorman, BTW, is no miracle worker, in case you didn't already know
that.
Dickstah
|
29.1757 | | CSOA1::ROPER | | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:48 | 14 |
| Okay, finally the long awaited answer to the trivia question.
<INSERT DRUM ROLL...>
CATFISH HUNTER. If memory serves, Jim went 6-0 during the crucial
month of August 1978. Remember the Boston Massacre? (Yanks 4 games out
in August, sweep 4 game series in Fenway) Anyway, Hunter was
magnificent the latter part of the season, particularly August. Yanks
needed someone to step forward other than Guidry, and Hunter was the
man.
Bob Roper
|
29.1758 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:28 | 17 |
| �ERA-wise, they're still at or very
� near the top of the league. Offensively, they're at or near the bottom
� in runs produced, batting average, on-base percentage, steals, doubles,
� singles, triples, homers, and just about every other category which
� causes or contributes to a win.
As of a day or so ago, the Red Sox pitching staff did indeed have the
lowest ERA in the AL. The offensive was ranked 14th (i.e. dead last)
in all major offensive categories. They do lead the AL in grand slams
though ;^).
Gorman has at least come forward and said that his (and other GM's)
hands are tied with the salaries. He can't add more money to the
payroll and other GM's aren't willing to add money to theirs.
Economics is governing player movement between teams more than
anything. If you were a GM from another team, who on the Sox would you
be willing to trade something of value for?
|
29.1759 | The New Breed of GM | MSBOS::BRYDIE | The last gang in town | Thu Aug 13 1992 13:03 | 9 |
|
>> Gorman has at least come forward and said that his (and other GM's)
>> hands are tied with the salaries. He can't add more money to the
>> payroll and other GM's aren't willing to add money to theirs.
I agree. It's really refreshing to see a GM shun blame. I'm so sick of
the standard, "Yeah, it's the team I built and it sucks. So fire me.
See if I care." It's gotten really old.
|
29.1760 | Look in the mirror Lou! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 13 1992 13:30 | 5 |
| Yeah, Lou's hands are tied because of the salaries alright. Who is
it who signed this flock a cattle at these outrageous prices? I don't
have a big problem with players making tons a dough, as long as they're
PLAYERS, and not daidbeats like the Socks seem to get.
Denny
|
29.1761 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | I brake for tailgaters | Thu Aug 13 1992 16:08 | 3 |
| Rollward, Tommy.
Mark.
|
29.1762 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Tired, poor, and wretched | Fri Aug 14 1992 09:47 | 6 |
|
Does a must-win game that keeps the Sox out of the cellar qualify as
a big-game clutch win for Clemens?
Dickstah
|
29.1763 | 1978 vs 1986 MVP stats.... | MEIS::SIKES | | Mon Aug 17 1992 14:09 | 14 |
| Team
Win Record
1978 G GS CG W - L Pct IP H R ER BB SO SHO ERA W - L
Guidry 35 35 16 25 - 3 .893 273.2 187 61 53 72 248 9 1.74 100-63
1978 G AB R H RBI 2B 3B HR HR% TB BB SO SB BA SLG W - L
Rice 163 677 121 213 139 25 15 46 6.8 406 58 126 7 .315 .600 99-64
Win
1986 G GS CG W - L Pct IP H R ER BB SO SHO ERA W - L
Clemens 33 33 10 24 - 4 .857 254 179 77 70 67 238 1 2.48 95-66
1986 G AB R H RBI 2B 3B HR HR% TB BB SO SB BA SLG W - L
Mattingly 162 677 117 238 113 53 2 31 4.6 388 53 35 0 .352 .573 90-72
|
29.1764 | I'm a Sox fan, but... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 17 1992 15:36 | 17 |
|
Both Guidry and Clemens deserved it, and we might as well throw in Orel
Hershiser in 1988 and Dwight Gooden in 1985, too. One of the biggest
myths going is that a starting pitcher doesn't have the impact or the
value of a star everyday player (of course the same baseball minds that
tell you this will also say, out of the other side of their mouths,
that pitching is 75% of baseball). A pitcher like Guidry, with a 1.74
ERA, gives his team about a 2.5-run advantage every time he takes the
mound (in Fenway Park, Roger Clemens' 2.48 wasn't far behind). You've
almost got a guaranteed win once every 4-5 days. The team wins 30 of
the guy's 35 starts, finishes .500 in the rest, and they're just about
a 95-win team. Rice had one of the greatest offensive seasons of the
last 20 years, but he was not as valuable as a guy who gave up only 53
ER in 35 starts, with 9 shutouts...
glenn
|
29.1765 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Aug 17 1992 15:39 | 2 |
| Keep it up, glenn, and I'll write to the Sox about having your season
tickets revoked ;^)
|
29.1766 | back into the fray | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Tue Aug 18 1992 10:43 | 9 |
|
Ah Glenn, just being nice to Guidry to protect Roger...I for one think
Rice deserved it and Mattingly also. Pitchers have the Cy Young award
and although it's great to say hey we got a quaranteed win just about every
5 days who carries you the other 4 days? The all-star everyday player that's
who. Pitchers especially the AL variety have no business winning an MVP in
my opinion. Heck there overpaid as it is already isn't that enough for them?
mike
|
29.1767 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:11 | 18 |
|
Roger Clemens made his personal tribute to the Great One last night,
wearing a number "33" on the side of his cap while warming up before
the big bad AL umpires made him remove it. So Roger went out and
pitched a 4-hitter for his 34th career shutout, a more fitting tribute
to athletic greatness anyway...
For career milestones, Clemens goes for his 150th career victory on
Sunday (and I intend on being there to see it, boring Red Sox or no
boring Red Sox). He's lowered his career ERA to 2.77. Whitey Ford's
was 2.74 and Sandy Koufax's was 2.76-- both compiled in pitchers'
parks-- and other than that there are none better from starting pitchers
post-WWII. His lifetime winning percentage of .687 is now second in
major league history to Whitey Ford's .690, as Dwight Gooden appears
to be fading into the sunset.
glenn
|
29.1768 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Wed Aug 19 1992 23:30 | 3 |
| Yeah yeah, Gary DiSarcina (of Billerica) wore #33 on his back as
a jersey number tonight...
|
29.1769 | | SHARE::DERRY | I think ya hear me knockin'... | Thu Aug 20 1992 08:35 | 6 |
| Nicknames for Butch Hobson's new baby boy -
Homer - 'cause the Sox ain't using it.
Owen - 'cause the Sox are 0 and one since his birth.
|
29.1770 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 20 1992 08:56 | 2 |
| Well, they've reached their goal, they're ZERO gongs out!
Denny
|
29.1771 | Not really..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Aug 20 1992 09:27 | 7 |
| yabbut they're sharing it with 2 others
(for today anyway)
hth,
Kev
|
29.1772 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Aug 20 1992 09:50 | 4 |
| Even though he beat the Red Sox and fellow UMass alum Jeff Reardon,
Gary DiSarcina sure made me proud last night.
Ninj
|
29.1773 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:03 | 8 |
| Because a bet is riding on this day after tomorrow, are the Sox and
Yanks TIED in the cellar right now? (Haven't seen the paper yet).
Also, do they both play tonight and tomorrow night?
tanks,
'Saw
|
29.1774 | uh huh! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:08 | 11 |
| 'Sawmain,
Yup, dey is tied for the celler!
Dunno about the Yankmees but tonight=California, tomorrow=Seattle,
Sattiday=Seattle, Sundayyyyy=Seattle, Monday->Wednesday=Oakland.
Hope this hertz,
Kev
|
29.1775 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:50 | 20 |
| > Dunno about the Yankmees but tonight=California, tomorrow=Seattle,
> Sattiday=Seattle, Sundayyyyy=Seattle, Monday->Wednesday=Oakland.
Every year that we have gone to Giantsmania, Beak (you guys remember Beak,
right?) and I have had a bet.
If the Red Sox are ahead of the Yankees in the standings, Beak opens
my beers before and during the pre-game tailgate.
If the Yankees are ahead of the Red Sox, I open Beak's beers before and
during the pre-game tailgate.
I have never lost the bet. Tonight's game and tomorrow night's games
will tell the tale....
'Saw
|
29.1776 | better start doing finger Push-UPS | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:54 | 0 |
29.1777 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:56 | 12 |
| > -< better start doing finger Push-UPS >-
Knowing Beak, he'll have bottles with caps that are hard to unscrew.
Thank God I've got an opener on my key ring!
8^)
'Saw
|
29.1778 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Thu Aug 20 1992 11:01 | 3 |
| Eh... I don't know...
-Joe Morgan
|
29.1779 | I'd say it's better than 50-50 that you'll at least get a tie | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Aug 20 1992 11:21 | 8 |
|
You might catch a break, Saw. The Sox have two fairly hot pitchers in
Darwin and Viola going the next two nights, while the Yankees have the
whiz-kid Millitello against the 1st-place A's and then an undetermined
stiff tomorrow night against California.
glenn
|
29.1780 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 20 1992 12:03 | 6 |
| I could live with a tie.
Hell, I'm in better shape than I was a month ago....
'Saw
|
29.1781 | It's in the Orangebook | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 20 1992 12:08 | 2 |
| If you guys tie, I think /Don gets to drink all your beers!
Denny
|
29.1782 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 20 1992 12:10 | 8 |
| > If you guys tie, I think /Don gets to drink all your beers!
> Denny
If you don't keep an eye on him, he tries to do that anyway [many 8^)]
'Saw
|
29.1783 | Shaadup 'Saw! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TabooIX-StarringWoodyAllen | Thu Aug 20 1992 13:54 | 1 |
|
|
29.1784 | Someone go to the game... | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Aug 20 1992 14:41 | 5 |
| I have 4 tickets for this Saturday August 22 vs. Seattle for sale.
Section 31 row 4 seats 5,6,7,8. My season tickets, nice seats,
nice people in our section. $10 per ticket.
Jimbo
|
29.1785 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Aug 20 1992 16:32 | 14 |
|
>> I have 4 tickets for this Saturday August 22 vs. Seattle for sale.
>> Section 31 row 4 seats 5,6,7,8. " My season tickets, nice seats,
>> nice people in our section." $10 per ticket.
>> Jimbo
Big mistake offerin' 'em up in here, Jimbo. You'll be "shunned"
nexted game!!
8^),
MikeL
|
29.1786 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Aug 21 1992 00:01 | 5 |
| I almost had a buyer for the tickets. Price goes down to $30 for
the 4 tickets. Why do I feel like I'm going to eat these
tickets. 8*)
Jimbo
|
29.1787 | Red Sox highlights warning! | SHARE::DERRY | Bush: vegetable or noxious weed? | Fri Aug 21 1992 07:16 | 4 |
| Maybe it wasn't that long ago but when was the lasted time the Sox were
in last this late in the season?
Totally clueless.
|
29.1788 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 21 1992 08:56 | 1 |
| 1966!!
|
29.1789 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:43 | 7 |
| Re .1787
"Totally clueless."
Karen, isn't that Hobson's line now?
Lee
|
29.1790 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:38 | 4 |
| Heard that last night the Sox went over 2M in attendance, as they also
took over sole place of last.
Lee
|
29.1791 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:57 | 7 |
| THANK YOU Red Sox!
They held off just long enough so I wouldn't lose that bet.....
'Saw
|
29.1792 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:00 | 18 |
|
>> Heard that last night the Sox went over 2M in attendance, as they also
>> took over sole place of last.
Yup, over 2 mil for the seventh consecutive season. Granted, Fenway is
a beautiful park right in the middle of a nice town but with the teams
they field year after year they don't deserve such fan loyalty. Last
night almost 34k showed up to watch the last place Sox get drubbed
by Oakland. Even sadder with Lou "I never saw a banquet table I didn't
like" Gorman as GM you can bet the only thing the Sox will improve in
the off season is their grip on second tier status. How long will Sox
fans put up with this ? As long as the Sox play in a small park that
puts tickets at a premium and as long as their fans brim with Hal-like
optimism. The real tragedy is that Roger Clemens, the best pitcher in
baseball, has a better chance of winning the Hustler Honey of the Year
than he does of winning a World Series ring here in Boston something he
richly deserves.
|
29.1793 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:27 | 11 |
| � Yup, over 2 mil for the seventh consecutive season. Granted, Fenway is
� a beautiful park right in the middle of a nice town but with the teams
� they field year after year they don't deserve such fan loyalty.
Tommy, I think you have Boston confused with Seattle or maybe Cleveland
~/~. But seriously, over the past 7 seasons the Sox have been in the
World Series once, the ALCS 2 or 3 times, and have had a shot most
other years. How many other teams can say that?
I suppose Celtics or Bruins fans should also be called sheep since they
haven't won a world championship in awhile either...
|
29.1794 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:31 | 27 |
| Tommy, you summed up the problem with the Red Sox exactly. Management
has no incentive to improve the team as long as they are drawing over
2,000,000 in attendance. People know that with a small park tickets
will be at a premium during the years when the Sox are in a pennant
race and on weekends regardless of how well the team is doing. Thus,
it's in management's best interest to pour money into Fenway Park for
the short term, even though Fenway Park biases the Red Sox negatively
on the field. Besides being small, Fenway Park is an attraction in and
of itself.
The Red Sox will not improve until they are forced to move from Fenway
Park and this will happen for one of two reasons:
1. The cost of maintaining the place becomes prohibitive
2. The team is sold. They can get away with Fenway Park now because
the franchise is virtually debt free. Once the Yawkey Foundation sells
the team, debt is back in the picture and the small ballpark coupled
with declining radio and TV revenues will force them to either jack the
prices sky high or build a bigger park.
When that happens, a major part of their attractiveness will go away.
They will then be forced to rely on winning teams to draw enough folks
to pay the bills. They will also be forced to build a team that can
compete in 162 games a year, which means speed and defense instead of
the long ball (which everyone will admit hasn't worked out this year).
John
|
29.1795 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:49 | 6 |
| � They will then be forced to rely on winning teams to draw enough folks
� to pay the bills.
Not if they learn the lessons from Old Fenway Park, Camden Yards, and
Sky Dome and build a New Fenway Park that people will want to come to
for the same reasons they go today.
|
29.1796 | Say NO to Domes!! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:53 | 2 |
| I wouldn't pay to go to a Sky Dome. Well, once maybe, but that's it!
Denny
|
29.1797 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:04 | 21 |
|
>> I suppose Celtics or Bruins fans should also be called sheep since they
>> haven't won a world championship in awhile either...
Should "also" be called sheep ? Who called anyone "sheep" ? What I
said was the Sox don't deserve such loyal fans and they don't. Pats
coach Dick MacPherson has a commercial where he delivers the line,
"they told me build a winning team and they will come", the Red Sox
don't have such worries. They can stink the joint out (and do) and the
fans still show up. And it's not just that they're bad but this is one
boring team. I've seen more excitement at quilting bees. Like I said
Fenway is a beautiful park and there are few better places to be in all
the world than Fenway on a nice summer day but enough is enough. Red Sox
fans deserve better.
BTW - "haven't won a world championship in awhile" ? How'd you like to
wait such awhile for your next raise ? Continents are formed in
less of "awhile" than it's taken for the Sox to win another
series.
|
29.1798 | Hehehehe.... | ICS::FINUCANE | | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:16 | 8 |
|
So, uh, Tommy.... How many quilting bees have you been to?
8-)
Cath
|
29.1799 | Emotionalism aside, Red Sox fans have not been "cheated" | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:35 | 26 |
|
Look for attendance to be down significantly next season. There's
usually a time delay in fan response to a lack of success on the field.
This is only the second season since the Red Sox won a division title,
and the first season since the early 1980s that portends continued
mediocrity.
The Red Sox don't "deserve" such loyal fans? Well, I'm one, and I don't
think that any such moral judgement applies to sports teams, or
conversely to their fans. Teams sell a product and they get as many
customers as the market for their product will bear, no more, no less.
Granted, the Red Sox may play in a market that historically favors
baseball over football (something I truly believe, but on the other
hand, for what they're trying to sell I don't think that the Patriots
have been price-competitive for some time), but if they don't remain
somewhat successful they won't draw as many fans and they won't make
as much money, simple as that.
To put it another way, half of all teams in all sports are below
average, and half are above average. Do the fans of the teams who are
below average "deserve better"? Nah, that's just the way the game is
played; there's a winner and a loser to each one. And which side of
that equation have the Red Sox been on most of the time since 1967?
glenn
|
29.1800 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:41 | 15 |
| Fan loyalty is an important thing. And you don't have to have a winning
team all the time either.
There were always second tier teams that had loyal followings: The
St. Louis Browns, the Washington Senators, the Philadelphia Phillies pre-1980.
Some second tier teams never came close to winning a pennant. As one
former player for the Browns said "Hell, if we won four in a row that
was something". Yet their fans were still loyal.
I've been a Sox fan for 26 years. I couldn't conceive of Not Being a Sox
fan....
'Saw
|
29.1801 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:43 | 39 |
| Why in the world should a Red Sox fan feel he/she should "apologize"
for attending baseball games in the stadium closest to home?
For heavens' sake, the Cubs stink and they get good attendence. Ditto
the Dodgers. I dare say even the Phillies could sell close to 2 million
ducats while fielding a last place team.
Wrigley, the Vet, Chavez Ravine and Fenway have loyal fans. Win or
lose. What's the matter with that?
I think Sox fans are caught in a Catch-22. If they support a lousy
product, they are merely abetting management's clandestine effort to
stand pat. If they don't show up for games, they're a bunch of whiney,
front-running spoiled yuppies.
The problem with the Sox ain't the fans. The problem is that a
tentative GM made some trades that, on paper, shoulda coulda worked.
So, the Sox are stuck with a bunch of overpriced baggage that no one
will accept in trade. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that
out.
I look at the Sox box scores every day. I see names like Vaughn,
Valentin, Zupcic (rememeber when so many starters' names started with
"B"?), Cooper and now Wedge. Boggs, Pena and Reed remain from the past.
Bruno continues to hit well while Clark and Mario Mendoza are getting
to know each other quite well. The 8 everyday players are changing
faster than I would have thought.
\
But pitching? Past Clemens, Viola and Harris, it really isn't much. The
team has no closer and no #3-#5 starter. And, from what I've seen of
the Pawsox, there ain't much to get worked up for on the farm.
I hope fans continue to support the team. Boston is a fabulous baseball
town that Seattle could only hope to emulate. The fans don't deserve
the lousy product on the field, but if a fan loves a day at the
ballyard, why shouldn't he take advantage of it?
Rich
|
29.1802 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:47 | 7 |
| � But pitching? Past Clemens, Viola and Harris, it really isn't much. The
� team has no closer and no #3-#5 starter.
Yabbut, the Sox have the best pitching staff in the AL (if not the
majors) as measured by ERA. The rest of those guys have been keeping
the Sox in ball games. It's just that despite giving up the fewest
runs in the league, they are scoring even fewer.
|
29.1803 | | DECWET::METZGER | Hello...ello...lo...o...o... | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:06 | 22 |
|
The Sox are lucky they play in Fenway park.
If you swapped the current M's with the current Sox the Sox in Seattle
wouldn't draw squat. Despite having the worst record in the majors
I'd rather see the M's out on the field than this edition of the Olde
Towne Team. The players on the M's put out effort every game, they
play solid defense, they have great position players and (other than
Randy Johnson and Harold Reynolds lately) don't whine continually.
The pitching staff is an absolute mess and the managers are probably
equal in stupidity but there is no doubt who I'd rather see at the
park..
If you took the Sox pitching staff and combined it with the M's starting
9 and found a real closer somewhere you'd have a division champion...
Other than Clemens, Viola and Harris this Sox team disgusts me with
their lack of fundementals and their lack of caring about how they
play on a given day...
Metz
|
29.1804 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:11 | 10 |
| Sorry guys, but I ain't buying the they ain't trying line either. I
don't think it is possible for anyone who grew up playing sports
competitively to just pick up a paycheck and put a token appearance on
the field.
I also think it's interesting how we're hearing the cries of "boring
baseball". Some of these same folks are saying can the DH because we
really don't measure excitement in terms of offense. Well folks, you
have the Sox involved in alot of low scoring, 1 and 2 run differential
games. I thought that was how you defined "exciting baseball".
|
29.1805 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:13 | 14 |
|
re. Glenn
Attendance won't be down "significantly" and the Red Sox damn
well know it. You'll be there next year and a whole bunch more
just like you will be there too because you can't put "emotionalism
aside" or apply macroeconomics when it comes to things like team
loyalty elsewise there'd be no Green Bay Packers. The Sox are the
only truly regional team in the game and they'll draw two mil or
close to it for as long as they play in Fenway. And if you don't think
you deserve better than what they've been passing off as baseball over
on Yawkey Way then I know you'll be back next year.
|
29.1806 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:20 | 27 |
| Rich, while I agree there's a lot to there just being a baseball fan
and liking the game, I still think the Red Sox management won't make
any significant changes until they're forced to. What will force them
to make changes will be a decrease in revenue. This can be
accomplished by a decline in attendance, a decline in NESN
subscriptions or a decline in ratings on either their "free" radio or
TV. As long as they have 2,000,000 tickets sold before the season
starts, they don't care about improving the team - they don't have to.
I don't bash anyone for wanting to go to the games. Fenway Park is a
great place and I really enjoy watching baseball in the summer (and I'd
enjoy it even more if the games weren't so damn long and slow, but
that's another issue), and many of our fellow New Englanders agree with
that sentiment as well. Given the scarcity of good seats, I don't
blame anyone for having season tickets, especially for the field boxes
and for weekend games.
It's a paradox, I know, but to me the only way the Sox are going to
improve is for the fans to stay away. I don't think that's ever going
to happen. For what it's worth, it's worked with the Patriots - we
didn't start trying to improve both on and off the field until the fans
of New England voted with their wallets and stayed away. You can
criticize the lack of results so far, but you can't criticize the
effort and you can't criticize the results in some areas, mostly off
the field (except the stat crew, which needed no improvement)
John
|
29.1807 | Just remember Glenn, RedSox Magic #, 911 | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:24 | 1 |
|
|
29.1808 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | sigh of relief goes here | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:34 | 13 |
| Metz hit on two big points in .1803. Defense and fundamentals.
There have been mediocre Red Sox teams and boring Red Sox teams in the
not too distant past.
But I don't ever recall a Red Sox team that has botched so many plays
in the field as this year's team has the past couple months. If I were
a Sox fan, this would have me reaching for the Excedrin a lot faster
than the lack of offense or lack of a closer or Lou Gorman's
shortcomings...
py
|
29.1809 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:00 | 13 |
|
Mac both a 2-1 and 10-8 game can be exciting. Difference is the 2-1 games
are the design of the Senior league (the only real league in MLB, IMO) and
the junior league is designed for the 10-8 with geek....
Didn't my buddy Clemens pitch a beauty the other day. Unbelievable stat from
the other day if you wanted to bet Roger you had to either lay 120 to make
50 or give up three runs. I'd have taken the runs in a heartbeat and sat back
in rocking chair.....
Is wade boggs hitting his weight yet????????
mike
|
29.1810 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:03 | 4 |
| � Didn't my buddy Clemens pitch a beauty the other day.
After winning 5 straight, Roger did indeed get taken apart by the
Mariners.
|
29.1811 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:22 | 2 |
|
Don't worry Mac he'll be back....
|
29.1812 | Waitaminute. The Sox are spending $40M/year to avoid change? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:28 | 42 |
|
Tommy, if every year were like this year I wouldn't go back, at least
not for the number of games that I do. But what exactly is it that Red
Sox fans "deserve"? Did they deserve the quality of play they got in
1991? 1990? 1989, 1988, 1986? (I'm not complaining about any one of
those years.) If your answer to my question is that the fans "deserve"
nothing less than a championship, then I strongly disagree. There is
no moral claim by the city of Boston to a baseball championship. None
whatsoever. That's the usual fatalistic woe-is-me crap that gives
Boston sports fans a bad name. Loyalty and enjoyment of the game for
the way it's played (and I admit, *this year* it hasn't been played
well in Boston) are their own rewards.
This business about the Red Sox refusing to try is so much bull, too.
If anything, they've tried too hard, and really screwed up doing so!
In 1990, nine out of every ten doomsaying Red Sox fans said that the
team would pinch pennies and surely Roger Clemens would leave
town. Result: the Sox signed Clemens to the largest contract in
baseball to that point, as they both expressed a commitment to winning
in the 1990s (at least Clemens has backed that up). Since then they've
gone out and spent big bucks for Tony Pena, Jeff Reardon, Jack Clark,
Danny Darwin, Matt Young, and Frank Viola (not to mention the money to
retain Tom Brunansky, Joe Hesketh, Mike Greenwell and others who
haven't gotten the job done), and claim one of the highest payrolls in
baseball. Does that sound like a team that's cynically sitting on its
expenses, counting the money that's pouring in? Could a team have
intentionally devised a more *unsuccessful* strategy for wasting their
money and turning off the fans at the same time?
On the other hand, the Patriots are credited for the "great strides"
they've made. I think it's perception, mostly, coaching or
organizational changes that have proven to be cosmetic to this point.
Which team annually seems to lose more Plan B free agents than they sign
(for a rebuilding team this should work the other way around), leaving
themselves at a major disadvantage when it comes to overall team depth,
a critical necessity in the NFL? Which team just fired the young player
personnel guy who just last year was going to be instrumental in
rebuilding the team through the draft? I still see disarray, I really
do...
glenn
|
29.1813 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:45 | 13 |
|
The Sox are around 12 games above .500 at home and 19-40 on the road.
For the life of me, I can't explain the big difference, other than a
lack of motivation when not receiving the cheers at home. A
defeatist, lackadasical, poor attitude (lack of trying) is what I see.
A couple of players will give 100% all the time, but as a team they
seem to belly up on the road once the other team takes the lead. It's
probably a combination of lack of individual motivation, and the
failure of the manager to motivate.
Dickstah
|
29.1814 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:56 | 19 |
|
Re Glenn
What do Sox fans deserve ? Better than the worst team in the weakest
division in baseball. Better than the only excitement at the ballgame
being the "Guess The Attendance Quiz". I never said that Boston de-
serves a championship every year so cut the "woe-is-me crap" crap. A
team with a little life is all I ask. Furthermore, point out to me where
I said that the Sox weren't trying. The problem with the Sox, as with
most teams that are incapable of winning, starts from the top down.Gorman
put this team together and signed all of those highpriced barnacles
you mentioned. The problem isn't that they haven't gone into the free
agent market. It's that they've gone in and come out with iron pyrite.
As for the Pats they were a few plays (that's right "plays") from making
the playoffs last year. The Sox will be damn lucky to improve as much as
the Pats did last year from the previous one.
_Tommy
|
29.1815 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:59 | 8 |
| re: trying
I don't thinkone can argue that management has not tried to build a
team, but sometimes you look at the team and have to wonder what they
are thinking about, surely not baseball.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1816 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:02 | 18 |
| � What do Sox fans deserve ? Better than the worst team in the weakest
� division in baseball.
The balance of power is again shifting east. The days of the AL East
being the worst league in baseball are fast receding. Even if they do
end up finishing in last place in the AL East, they will not be the
worst team in baseball.
� team with a little life is all I ask. Furthermore, point out to me where
� I said that the Sox weren't trying.
Right there.
� As for the Pats they were a few plays (that's right "plays") from making
� the playoffs last year.
Tommy, I know you know this, but only 4 teams make the playoffs in
baseball. There are what, 12 spots available in football?
|
29.1817 | | DECWET::METZGER | Hello...ello...lo...o...o... | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:06 | 24 |
|
The big problem with the Sox free agent signings is that they are
throwing big bucks at marginal talent too often...
I don't think anybody has any problems with the signing of Viola or Pena.
They were good moves to make.
However throwing big bucks at Clark, Young, Darwin and Reardon wasn't
too smart. Clark was on the down hill slide of a good career. It was
spotable even without hindsight. Darwin was a 50-50 call after a year
where he led the league in ERA but didn't throw that many innings (I
think), Converting him over to a starter was a crap shoot, signing
Reardon was stupid because the Sox already had a good closer..Smith
was the better investmant at that time, signing Young for the contract
he did was sheer folly, after losing 19 games for the M's the previous
season Young was a total crapshoot who might have been worthy of a
small investment but certainly not a huge free agent signing...
The Sox should stick to signing the big money proven free agents that
they can afford and stop signing the marginal free agents to big buck
contracts..Go after the Barry Bonds but stay away from the Danny Jackson,
Randy Johnson, Eric Davis type investments..
Metz
|
29.1818 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:15 | 32 |
| I want to expand a little bit on what I mean about the Red Sox trying
to improve.
Misguided though they may be, they've attempted to do so on the field.
Their approach may have been wrong and their results may have been
disastrous, but they've at least tried.
They have to go through a front office revolution like they went
through in September 1965 on the day of Dave Morehead's no-hitter when
they fired Mike "Pinky" Higgins as General Manager and replaced him
with Dick O'Connell. That move more than any other built the basis for
1967 and made the Red Sox into consistent contenders for the next
quarter century.
The Red Sox do a great job in marketing and promotion. They have good
scouting (albeit a bit biased for the uniqueness of Fenway Park), good
minor league coaching and good player development. They need more.
They need a guy who will go out and scout the major leagues to see who
is worth spending the money on and who is worth trading for.
They need a team of guys who will go out and evaluate the minor
leagues. The Red Sox lag behind just about everyone else in baseball
when it comes to pirating young prospects away from other minor league
systems where Toronto is a leader in this area. The Red Sox
consistently are net losers in this area.
I don't know if they need a new General Manager or not, but I do know
that no matter who they have in that post, he's not going to succeed
without more help in the evaluation areas.
John
|
29.1819 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:16 | 8 |
|
I'll give you the worst team stuff but I still didn't say that they
weren't trying just that they were boring and they stink. Tell me I'm
wrong. And as for the Pats went from being the laughingstock of the NFL
to an entertaining, competitve squad. Although with this year's schedule
that could all change.
|
29.1820 | It doesn't take long to re-load in baseball... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:23 | 24 |
|
> The Sox should stick to signing the big money proven free agents that
> they can afford and stop signing the marginal free agents to big buck
> contracts..Go after the Barry Bonds but stay away from the Danny Jackson,
> Randy Johnson, Eric Davis type investments..
Absolutely no argument here. I've only been defending the Sox on the
basis of their intentions, and what fans have a right to expect.
Cynicism aside, I think you will see the Red Sox cut most of the $14
million in payroll that's available to them this winter (Boggs,
Brunansky, Harris, Hatcher, Pena, Reardon, Winningham) and draw into
the equal amount that goes away next winter (Reed, Greenwell, Burks,
Clark, Young), and make at least one big-ticket signing of an offensive
talent in this off-season. Contrary to popular belief, the Red Sox are
subject to economic forces and must take some action this winter or they
will lose marginal revenue at the gate, and probably more importantly on
the tube.
As for last place, so what? I don't consider it to be a cataclysmic
event (or maybe I hope it is a cataclysmic event). It hasn't happened
to the Red Sox since 1932, but it's inevitable for any team...
glenn
|
29.1821 | Dodgers in last as well | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:28 | 10 |
| re: last place stuff
Dodgers last finished in last in 1905. Unless they go 20-17 they will
finish with the worst record they have had since moving to LA. The
difference between fans in Boston and LA is truly highlighted by the
reactions to their teams predicaments. No criticism intended of wither
teams fans, just a remarkable difference.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1822 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 25 1992 17:29 | 15 |
| �Clark was on the down hill slide of a good career. It was
�spotable even without hindsight.
I don't think so. The aquisition of Clark was widely acclaimed in New
England by fans and media alike. There were a few grumblings (mostly
by Yankee fans ;^) ) about an alleged attitude problem, but overall
most agreed he was the best available solution to the Sox power outage.
�signing Young for the contract
�he did was sheer folly,
A move apparently made out of panic when it didn't look like they'd get
any type of pitching help. If they had been able to sign Darwin first,
I don't think they would have pursued Young. Or if they did, it would
have been for less money.
|
29.1823 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Aug 26 1992 08:02 | 7 |
| Loved hearing Bob Lobel talk last night about the T-shirts being sold
outside Fenway:
Sox Magic Number is 911. :*) :*)
Lee
|
29.1824 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Wed Aug 26 1992 09:31 | 9 |
|
Keep up the good humor boys...hahahaaa
now if his highness throws a few more stinkers this will indeed be a worth
wile season....
imagine you guys can't even pick on Cleveland anymore...
hahahahahaaa
|
29.1825 | y | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:12 | 46 |
| To me, the strength of any organization is it's minor league
affiliates. I recall going to see the Tidewater Tides in 1969 in
Norfolk when I was in the navy. They had a couple of guys named Ken
Singleton and Amos Otis patrolling in the outfield. The Mets have
continued to do a good job with their farm system.
Ditto the Orioles, Dodgers and Yankees. In the Yankee case, they always
seemed to trade really good prospects or brought kids up too soon and
then gave up on them ala Dravecky.
The Red Sox have usually had a decent farm system but, as John Hendry
pointed out, they lacked the foresight to provide expert specialized
coaching - even in AAA. This, I think, has adversely affected their
pitching woes for years.
This years' Pawtucket team scares the heck out of me. I see very little
help on the way from AAA. Retreads like John Shelby, Bob Geren and
Steve Lyons toil as everyday players under Petrocelli. Admitted,
Valentin, Wedge and Plantier were plucked from the roster. But,
apparently, there was nobody down in New Britain to make the step up to
AAA and develop further. I know Class A Lynchburg is tearing up the
Carolina league but these players are about 3-5 years away from the
majors. So, internal development looks bleak at this time.
Contrast this to what I see with the Braves. Their AAA club here in
Richmond has bona fide prospects like Ryan Klesko, Kieth Mitchell,
Francesco Cabrera, Ramon Caraballo and Jeff Manto. They have a guy who
can play all infield positions named Boi Rodriguez who has the highest
HR per AB ratio in the IL. They have a real good pitching prospect
named David Nied and another pitcher named Armando Reynoso who led the
IL in ERA last year and is in the top 3 this year. Closer Mark Wohlers
has shown his stuff in Atlanta already but is back down because there
simply isn't room at the major league level for him. Add dale Polley
and Randy St. Claire as middle relievers and the Braves should feel
good about what is in their future.
And, at AA Greenville, Chipper Jones is making the Braves feel good
about making his a #1 pick.
Can the Red Sox feel good about their farm system? I don't think so.
One note of interest. For all you "Bull Durham" fans, Durham Athletic
park (DAP) will be torn down at the end of the 1993 season.
Rich
|
29.1826 | Some life at Fenway, expect more today... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:21 | 22 |
|
There was some small consolation in last night's game for those
lamenting the lack of excitement with the Red Sox. In the context of
a single game that doesn't have a whole lot of meaning beyond itself,
this might have been the most entertaining and interesting game of the
year for the Sox. Beating Eckersley is so rare, and special when it
happens, especially with his history of lording over his old team since
his conversion to erlief ace.
Also refreshing was the response to the A's usual intimidation techniques
(one of the things that has made them and Tony LaRussa great over the
years) after Terry Steinbach took exception to the Sox playing the game
the same way the A's like to play it, hard and relentless. Danny Darwin
came out and stuck up for his 160-pound teammate Scott Cooper (who would
have been pile-driven had he responded to Steinbach's egging) by
plunking Rickey Henderson on the thigh. Even though it resulted in an
important run for the A's, from this lifeless, last-place team I was
glad to see it. Henderson eventually left the ball game, so expect more
fireworks this afternoon. Tony LaRussa doesn't forget.
glenn
|
29.1827 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:38 | 8 |
| re .1826:
Cooper also made an excellent defensive play on a hard hit ball down
the third-base line, a play that the Wade Boggs of 1992 would not have
made.
py
|
29.1828 | this from the anti-sox contingent | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:43 | 7 |
| re: .1825
Cabrera and Manto are no longer bonafide AAA prospects in my opinion.
I think alot of the Sox people forget about the injuries to Greenwell,
Burks and Quintanna. With those three players, they team would be
alot better than they are now...
|
29.1829 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:50 | 8 |
| > I think alot of the Sox people forget about the injuries to Greenwell,
> Burks and Quintanna. With those three players, they team would be
> alot better than they are now...
I'd also add Jeff Gray to that list.
py
|
29.1830 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:02 | 11 |
|
Forgot about him AND Plantier.
Greenwell might be no gold glove outfielder, but he is a .300 hitter
and so is Carlos. The teams problem this year has been hitting and
not pitching. Me thinks we those two and Burks in the line-up, the
team would be above .500. I'd still take the Jays or O's to win
the division, but they certainly would not be in last.
The injuries have given them a chance to take long looks at some
of the guys in the majors, this will help in the long run.
|
29.1831 | Sox = living in the past | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:07 | 24 |
| To jump on a bandwagon a bit...
I agree that the Red Sox, at one time had a top notch organization, but time
has passed them by.
The lack of instructors on the minor league level, along with the apparent
inability to evaluate talent (most of the "future stars" to come up have been
mediocre at best, while we all know about good ones gettign away), the lack of
major league scouting (I've heard they operate off year old scouting reports for
an entire season), the lack of talent in the front office (the Glob today has
two columns that basically say that the job is too big for Lou Gorman, and he
refuses to recognize it) all add up to a team caught in the 1970s. Compare
them to the Athletics, for instance - great scouting, top flight instructors
in the majors and minors, etc. and the future is glum. On top of that, the
Boston fans seem to think that there are people on the roster that other teams
would actually be interested in trading for.
re: last night's game
Darwin pitched a gutsy game, and it is a shame that it wasn't his win. Of
course it would have been, if the defense wasn't so uniformly awful. Glad the
Sox have a former NLer like Hatcher who can come through in the clutch.
=Bob=
|
29.1832 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:30 | 38 |
|
For the true believers, I present the 1993 Red Sox home schedule.
Apr 12, 14, 15 Cleveland
Apr 16-19 Chicago
Apr 30, May 1-2 California
May 3-4 Seattle
May 5-6 Oakland
May 17-19 Toronto
May 21-23 New York
May 28-30 Texas
May 31, Jun 1-2 Kansas City
June 10-13 Baltimore
June 21-23 Minnesota
June 25-27 Detroit
June 28-30 Milwaukee
July 15-18 Seattle
July 19-21 California
July 22-25 Oakland
August 10-12 New York
August 13-15 Toronto
August 17-18 Chicago
August 19-22 Cleveland
Aug 30-31, Sep 1 Texas
Sept 3-5 Kansas City
Sept 13-15 Baltimore
Sept 24-26 Minnesota
Sept 27-30 Detroit
Oct 1-3 Milwaukee
Note: All weekend games are currently listed at 105, though 1 Sunday game
will probably be moved to night for ESPN. Weekday afternoon games are April
12, April 14, May 6 and July 21. 6PM games are April 15, April 16 and June 2.
All other weekday games are at 735.
John
|
29.1833 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:08 | 16 |
|
Do you think that (just maybe) everyday when he looks at the
standings in the paper Joe Morgan has little chuckle to himself ?
He hung that "dead ass ballclub" tag on the Sox last year but
compared to this year's club that one looked like the '27 Yankees.
Ayuh, old Joe gotta be sittin' on his back porch down on the Cape
listening to the ballgame on the radio, drinking a 'Gansett and
having a few guffaws. On the other hand, there's probably a suicide
watch on poor Butch Hobson. The guy has his dream come true when
Lou "Body By Budweiser" Gorman taps him on the shoulder to manage
the Sox then he gets a reality smack when he finds he's saddled with
baseball's answer to the Washington Generals and the future looks
brighter in New Orleans than it does for the Sox right now. I guess
it's true, timing *is* everything.
|
29.1834 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MachoRoomsUpstairs | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:10 | 7 |
| All this chit chat about a last place club cracks me up. Why
do they stink? 'Cuz they're the Red Sox, that's why. Why do they
draw 2 million fans? 'Cuz the racial makeup of the team appeals
to the yuppie brie eaters who own all the good seats. But Roger
is still God� and I know Mike Childs agrees with me.
/Don
|
29.1835 | When the team rebounds the bandwagon will refill... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:25 | 16 |
|
> Why do they
> draw 2 million fans? 'Cuz the racial makeup of the team appeals
> to the yuppie brie eaters who own all the good seats.
Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
place is going to clear out? The yuppie brie eaters and the
corporations who own the good seats are automatic renewals. It's the
grandstands and the bleachers where attendance will fluctuate with
performance. Even a yearly attendance of 2 million is a drop of over
400K of these fans and represents a loss to the Red Sox of several
million dollars, straight from their profit bottom line if expenses
aren't adjusted.
glenn
|
29.1836 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:52 | 44 |
| The lower boxes are all sold to season ticket holders. Those are
pretty much automatic renewals.
The upper boxes from about section 8 all the way over to section 33 are
all sold to season ticket holders. Those are pretty much automatic
renewals.
There is some proportion of bleacher seats sold to season ticket
holders. I don't think you'd see that change much.
Most of the seats up on the roof are sold to season ticket holders.
That won't change. The remaining roof seats go fast.
The grandstands from section 8 to 33 are sold out on weekends. I'm not
sure how much of the grandstands or upper boxes beyond section 8 are
sold to season ticket holders on weekends. They are not sold out
during the week.
I would guess for any weekend game they have a minimum of 25,000
tickets sold to season ticket holders. Since weekend games are almost
all played during the day, I would guess that weekends will continue to
sell out for the forseeable future no matter how bad the team gets.
I would also guess they sell a minimum of 20,000 tickets to season
ticket holders for night games and weekday afternoon games. When they
start to lose attendance it will be noticed in the deep right field
grandstands and in the bleachers first. I have noticed some thin
crowds out there for some of the weeknight games this year, especially
against the poorer opponents. I'd bet if Seattle was here in midweek
last week, we'd have seen some dreadful crowds and I'll also bet the
Milwaukee and Cleveland series next month draw poorly.
Any weeknight game in April or May against a poor opponent remains the
best bet for seeing a game and getting decent seats. Even against
a good Minnesota team in May I bought 2 great grandstand tickets at 7PM.
Best bets for decent seats next season:
1. Cleveland on either April 14 or April 15
2. Seattle on either May 3 or May 4
3. Oakland on either May 5 or May 6
4. Detroit on either Sept 27, 28, 29 or 30
John
|
29.1837 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:00 | 10 |
|
>> Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
>> place is going to clear out?
The racial makeup of this team hasn't changed in thirty years and I
doubt it will as long as the Yawkey Foundation owns the club. On the
other hand despite Boston's horrible reputation (much of it deserved)
I think if the Red Sox fielded an exciting, competitive club the fans
would come out no matter what the racial makeup.
|
29.1838 | Look at the greatest years of Red Sox' success... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:13 | 21 |
|
>> Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
>> place is going to clear out?
> The racial makeup of this team hasn't changed in thirty years and I
> doubt it will as long as the Yawkey Foundation owns the club. On the
> other hand despite Boston's horrible reputation (much of it deserved)
> I think if the Red Sox fielded an exciting, competitive club the fans
> would come out no matter what the racial makeup.
I agree wholeheartedly with the latter statement, but I would point
out that by no coincidence the 1967, 1975, and 1986-era teams were all
racially diverse (by MLB standards), were all very successful, and
maybe most importantly were all very popular. Whatever prejudices
Tom Yawkey may or may not have harbored (and it's indisputable that his
cronies and associates were among the biggest racists in baseball), I
do not accept the premise that he was only carrying out an agenda that
the common Boston Red Sox fan requires and demands.
glenn
|
29.1839 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MachoRoomsUpstairs | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:19 | 6 |
| I agree Tommy. If a team is winning you could put 8 convicts
out there and people would still pack the park. But if a team is
mediocre, or worse, more white guys on the team means more fans
in the stands, and not just in Boston. Just my opinion.
/Don
|
29.1840 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:52 | 11 |
|
Glenn, I wish I had the rosters for each of the years you mentioned
because in all the years that I've been a Sox fan I can't remember a
single club that could be labeled as "racially diverse" by any standard.
And I refuse to believe that it's sheer coincidence that the clubhouse
in Shoal Creek is more integrated than the one in Fenway. And I agree
with /Don, Yawkey may or may not have been trying to give the people what
they want, with the lack of racial diversity, but obviously they've liked
what they've gotten.
|
29.1841 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:11 | 9 |
| re .1838., .1840:
The 1986 roster included Jim Rice, Oil Can Boyd, Dave Henderson, and
Don Baylor.
Did Ellis Burks get a late-season callup that year?
py
|
29.1842 | It's a sorry history, but there have been bright spots... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:31 | 36 |
|
Tommy, the racial diversity of those successful pennant-winning teams
was pretty well documented in a special three-part piece that ran in
the Globe last year (which I saved to serve as kind of a mental
benchmark on the social state of the Sox, 1991, if anyone is ever
interested in this subject as I am, as a Red Sox fan). From memory,
the 1967 team had George Scott, Joe Foy, Reggie Smith, Jose Tartabull,
Jose Santiago and John Wyatt all as key contributors. The 1975 team
had Jim Rice, Cecil Cooper, Luis Tiant, Roger Moret, Diego Segui and
Juan Beniquez (and maybe a couple of other part-timers I've forgotten).
The 1986 team had Rice, Don Baylor, Oil Can Boyd, Dave Henderson, Ed
Romero, Tony Armas, and Rey Quinones. There *were* the most racially
diverse teams in Red Sox history (and above the MLB averages), and also
the most successful.
Red Sox fans have *not* always liked what they've gotten. What got this
entire string started was the opinion (mine) that Red Sox fans have
liked the team when it's successful, and have delivered attendance
hits when it hasn't been. Certainly Red Sox fans *disliked* with a
passion the pathetic, nearly all-white teams assembled under notorious
racist Pinky Higgins in the early 1960s (the Don Buddins and the Eddie
Bressouds and the Dick Stuarts of that era give at least a partial lie
to the assertion that, at the very least, bad white players will
tolerated).
I'm not saying that Sox fans couldn't have done more, been more openly
outraged and staged protests or whatnot. I think what you'll find is
that the major sports leagues are not usually the most obvious or
accepted political arena, and fans tend to vote more quietly, with their
feet. And (as was my point from the start), even Red Sox fans have
voted with their feet in the past, and will do so again if mediocrity
persists.
glenn
|
29.1843 | Elston Howard was also on the 1967 team | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:53 | 1 |
|
|
29.1844 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:14 | 24 |
| I saw the New Britain Red Sox play the Canton-Akron Indians last evening,
at Beehive Field in New Britain.
Folks, things look bleak. The Britsox are not hitting well, in fact
they look like Jack Clark clones. The highest batting average on the
team is .246!
Their pitcher (forget his name) is now 3-19, but in watching him pitch,
he could throw some heat. I'm wondering how he'd be doing with some
good ball players behind him.
The shortstop Bethea was pretty good in the field, but he had a horrible
night at the plate.
The Indians pitcher had something like 9 or 10 Ks in the game. He was
throwing some smoke also.
Sox lost 3-2, almost pulled it out in the 9th with a 2-run homer, but
then the last man up (you guessed it) struck out.....
'Saw
|
29.1845 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:32 | 4 |
| The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
effect on batting averages.
John
|
29.1846 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:34 | 21 |
|
>> The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
>> effect on batting averages.
To the extent that no one is capable of hitting over .246 ? I think
the fact that now one down in New Britain can hit is a more plausible
explanation for that anemic stat. It's often said (and probably true)
that no city places as much emphasis on its baseball team as Boston.
With the future looking darker than nighttime in Homestead the loyalty
of BoSox fans will be severely tested over the next few years. Granted,
having Carlos Quintana, who just may be their best everyday player, back
will help. And if Greenwell and Burks are both healthy next year the
club will be significantly improved but there are some gaping holes in
this team. Furthermore, Burks has never really lived up to expectations,
injuries or no, and Greenwell put the excitement back into the routine
fly ball. You just can't win in the majors with a slow, one base at a
time, defensively weak ballclub and that's exactly what the Sox are. But
that's nothing new, is it ?
|
29.1847 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:09 | 27 |
| | >> The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
| >> effect on batting averages.
That and the fact that the bats had this tremendous tendency to stay
on shoulders. Also, the fact that when the bats were swung they
didn't make contact with the ball. 8^)
With the exception of the home run, the Sox were two hit last night,
and the first was a GIFT:
Grounder to first, 1B toss to P who misses bag, then HITS
back a half a step before the batter did. (I was on the 1B
line, perfect view).
Ump calls the guy safe, Official Scorer flashes the H.
So the Sox had one legitimate hit before the homer. There was one
line drive out, and one fly out, one foul pop, and the rest harmless
infield grounders.
'Saw
|
29.1848 | Who hit the home run, Saw? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:43 | 37 |
|
The Sox have only three everyday players in New Britain (and Pawtucket,
for that matter, not counting guys being punished like Phil Plantier)
who are considered potential quality major-leaguers-- Greg Blosser (who
is destroying the NB home run record this year, showing that batting
average isn't anything), Jeff McNeely, and Scott Hatteberg. The
shortstop Bethea may be a sleeper, but the rest of the high
minor-league talent is filler. That's okay, though, as long as at
least two of the above-mentioned names pan out. That's the real job of
the minor-league system, to produce one or two major-league talents a
year; not to win minor-league pennants (even though that's what AAA ball
has evolved into, to draw fans).
As I pointed out earlier, three of the Red Sox' top amateur draft
picks the past four years are all-around athletic types with speed,
who also happen to be black (McNeely, J.J. Johnson, and the kid from
Florida they drafted out of high school this past spring whose name
eludes me at the moment). They still have to prove they can hit first
though, because unless you're a shortstop you just can't get by in
the big leagues on speed and defense alone. The fourth top pick was
the much-heralded Frankie Rodriguez, who is a great athlete but has
been converted to pitcher because he also has a 95-mph fastball.
I am not nearly so discouraged by the prospects of the Red Sox for the
next few years as the Boston media and most of their fans are. They
like to talk one game-- rebuild from within, don't panic, be patient--
but the reality is that when a kid comes to Boston and fails to impress
in his first 200 ABs he's immediately labelled a failure. I still
believe that Phil Plantier, Mo Vaughn, John Valentin, and Eric Wedge
can be successful big-leaguers (I'm not as sold on Bob Zupcic and Scott
Cooper, though). With the exception of Blosser, the Red Sox have been
drafting heavily for althleticism and pitching over the past five years.
It may not work, but at this stage that game plan is in place and
should not be abandoned because the fans perceive that there's no hope.
glenn
|
29.1849 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:44 | 7 |
| Park effects, eh?
I didn't know NB had a 600 Club also. Good training for the Big Yard
excusism??
8^),
MikeL
|
29.1850 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:54 | 1 |
| MikeL, New Britain has a 700 Club. They pray for a good season.
|
29.1851 | HAHAHAHAHA Good one / | CTHQ1::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:59 | 1 |
|
|
29.1852 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:18 | 15 |
| Actually, the park in NB is a nice little park.
We had free box seats (my dad got some complimentaries) and they've
actually put seats in the box sections. Used to be bleachers, like the
rest of the park.
Beer is available and so is non-alcoholic brew ($2 for a 16oz, $3 for
Sam Adams 16oz). The food there used to be good, but I didn't sample it
last night, cause I'd eaten already.
Not a bad seat in the house, and they run a lot of the "lucky number"
type things in the half-inning breaks...
'Saw
|
29.1853 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:39 | 11 |
| � Cooper also made an excellent defensive play on a hard hit ball down
� the third-base line, a play that the Wade Boggs of 1992 would not have
� made.
The same Cooper who botched a routine play which eventually cost the
Sox a run?
I think what really upset LaRussa the most after Henderson was hit by
Darwin was that a warning was issued to both benches, thus not giving
the A's a chance to retaliate. Read "Men at Work" sometime, LaRussa
admits to this way of thinking.
|
29.1854 | It ain't that bad | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:45 | 11 |
| �(most of the "future stars" to come up have been
�mediocre at best,
I know people like to bash Greenwell and Burks, but the above is
stretching it a bit. In more recent times we may have seen what are
essentially sophomore slumps or cases where guys were brought up to
early to fill real voids in the parent club.
�while we all know about good ones gettign away
Yeah, where is Reggie Harris today anyway?
|
29.1855 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:50 | 8 |
|
� -< Look at the greatest years of Red Sox' success... >-
And look at the makeup of this year's team. Not much different in
those terms, is it?
Tommy, speaking of prejudice, what's this hangup you seem to have with
those who are waistline challenged?
|
29.1856 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:17 | 6 |
| >> Tommy, speaking of prejudice, what's this hangup you seem to have with
>> those who are waistline challenged?
Didn't think I had a "hangup" but I can see how others would after
going back and reading some of my comments about Gorman. I'll try
and be a little more sensitive in the future.
|
29.1857 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:18 | 4 |
|
big deal Mac, Boggs would have blown the play as well.....of course he'd
have doven to the ground after the ball was already into left field to
make it look good.........
|
29.1858 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:28 | 42 |
| Pretty good assessment of the current Sox minor league situation,
Glenn. I don't get to see or read anything about New Britain so I'm not
at clear as to who is waiting for the train towards Pawtucket. What
concerns me is what I have seen in AAA. I usually see the Pawsox
everytime they are in town to play the Braves (now that the Triple-A
Aliance is dead, that's a heck of a lot more than in the past) and I
see alarming signals that bode badly.
For instance, last Friday night, the Pawsox came back to win 6-5 in 10
innings. BUT, inning after inning, they would get 4 or 5 hits and move
one base at a time. Other than Housie, who is hitting near .200, and
Jim Byrd (slick fielding SS), they have zilch for speed. Lumbering
around the bases, one at a time.
The only spark was Lyons. The guy is really a hoot. He was playing 3rd.
Braves 2d baseman Caraballo is a threat to steal and likes to bunt.
Everytime he came to bat, Lyons would charge to within 10 feet of home
plate yelling like a banshee. Psyched Caraballo out big time.
Then, Braves 3rd baseman started jawing at Lyons about the antics.
Lyons started swiping his feet around between pitches and I really
didn't pay any attention. Then, when Manto went out to play 3rd the
next inning, he started laughing and so did Lyons from the Sox dugout.
Lyons had scrawled, "You A^%hole" in the dirt. 11,000 fans realized
what was going on and started cheering and clapping. I tell you, Steve
Lyons is one character.
But, back to the game. The Pawsox, outside of Irvine, don't seem to
have a reliever who can do much. Jeff Plympton comes in, looking as
chubby as LaMar Hoyt, and tosses lollipops up there. I have to wonder,
if the Sox have "anything" in AA or A, why don't they promote them to
give them better competition? Morton is sucking rain water. Was he
ruined ala Bobby Sprowel up in Boston last year?
The perception is that the Sox accept mediocrity. By keeping players
like Matt Young and Jack Clark on the major league roster, by having
players like John Shelby and Bob Geren taking up spots in AAA, they are
sending a message to their fans that they are content at the top and
don't mind clogging up their top farm system with has beens.
Rich
|
29.1859 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:48 | 6 |
| �Folks, things look bleak. The Britsox are not hitting well, in fact
�they look like Jack Clark clones. The highest batting average on the
�team is .246!
Beehive Field is widely known as one of the worst hitting parks
anywhere.
|
29.1860 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:51 | 3 |
| Hmm, the Indians have a farm team in Canton-Akron. I wonder why they
didn't make that team their AAA club. Canton-Akron is a heck of a lot
closer to Cleveland than Colorado Springs.
|
29.1861 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:07 | 14 |
| re .1859:
> Beehive Field is widely known as one of the worst hitting parks
> anywhere.
Also, the Eastern League as a whole is a pitcher's league (contrast
with the Pacific Coast League, where everybody and their brother hits
.300).
But still, even a team playing half its games in Yellowstone ought to
have somebody closer to .300 than .200...
py
|
29.1862 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:15 | 3 |
| Rumor today is that Jack Clark cleaned out his locker prior to the West
Coast roadtrip. Expectations are that he will either be traded or
released.
|
29.1863 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:31 | 18 |
| I had to opportunity to watch a lot of Steve Lyons when he played in
New Britain. He was so enjoyable to watch, it made the game exciting.
One night, in a definite bunt situation, late in a game they were leading
by a run, I saw Lyons line up on the outfield grass. On the warmup
he came charging in at 100mph, the batter laid down the bunt, Lyons
barehanded it, and made the throw to end the inning... Great stuff.
Beehive Field is 325 down the left field line, 8 feet more than
Fenway. The right field line is similar, it's no longer marked, but
I believe that it's 403 straight-away.
While it may not be a hitter's park, it is a Fan's Park, and next
year it might be fun for a gettogether....
'Saw
|
29.1864 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:54 | 13 |
| >>Beehive Field is 325 down the left field line, 8 feet more than
>>Fenway. The right field line is similar, it's no longer marked, but
>>I believe that it's 403 straight-away.
Well, it sounds to me as though Beehive field fits in with just about
most parks. The Diamond in Richmond is 325 down both sidelines and 402
to center. I think McCoy has similar dimensions.
Heck, the senior Little League field near my house has 310' foul lines
and 390 to center field.
Rich
|
29.1865 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:43 | 21 |
|
Forget about the dimensions. Maybe the ball doesn't carry there (I
think they did move home plate out to reduce the distances, but it's
still a pitcher's park). For all of the home run hitters the Red Sox
have had over the years, Greg Blosser is still the first player ever
to hit even 20 home runs in a season at New Britain, and he's hit 18
or 19 of those on the road. But come to think of it, these days 20
home runs anywhere below AAA is a pretty fair accomplishment. Maybe
it's the fact that in AA we're talking about young 20-22 year-old kids
who aren't fully physically developed.
That doesn't explain the low batting averages, though, which say most
of the players just can't hit the pitching they're seeing, for whatever
reason, inexperience, lack of talent, whatever. Jeff Bagwell (whatwould
wedowithhimjustanunprovenkidneverknowhowaprospect'sgonnaturnoutcan'tpass
uptheopportunitytowinitallwithaLarryAndersengodblesshim) won the
overall AA batting title there two years ago...
glenn
|
29.1866 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:44 | 7 |
|
What would a "senior Little League" be? All I can picture is a bunch
of middle-aged guys with a mental age of under 12. Do they provide
all the equipment or do I have to bring my own spikes?
Dickstah
|
29.1867 | Dickstah wants a team | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:53 | 6 |
| Hey Dickstah were you applying to join a senior Little League??
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.1868 | H'mmm.....better than MtM's mebbe? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Fri Aug 28 1992 00:04 | 13 |
| Sounds like it beats Rugby!
Where cain I apply?
I cain cry, stomp my feet, swing and wiff at pitches, I like to play in
the sand and chase insects.
Could be my kind of game!!!!!!!!
I remain,
a competitive child at heart!
Kev
|
29.1869 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 10:44 | 14 |
|
> As I pointed out earlier, three of the Red Sox' top amateur draft
> picks the past four years are all-around athletic types with speed,
> who also happen to be black (McNeely, J.J. Johnson, and the kid from
> Florida they drafted out of high school this past spring whose name
> eludes me at the moment).
Tony Sheffield (no relation to Gary, or Doc, alas) is the kid's name,
if anyone cares. He's only 18 years old, plays the outfield, can run
but also has power. He's the latest "next Willie Mays" in the Sox'
organization, so remember the name... ;-)
glenn
|
29.1870 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:32 | 9 |
| RE:.1868
� I cain cry, stomp my feet, swing and wiff at pitches, I like to play in
^^^
THERE'S NO CRYING IN BASEBALL!
RE: .1861
Hey 'Sawmain, I would be up for a Beehivemanis�
|
29.1871 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:33 | 8 |
| Senior Little Leage is the name given to organized ball played by kids
aged 13-16 here in Virginia. Guess you Yanks call it Babe Ruth League.
Read in this mornings paper that McCoy is 325 down the lines and 380
to dead center.
Rich
|
29.1872 | I'd rather see these kids than the old-timers at Pawtucket... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:36 | 8 |
|
> Hey 'Sawmain, I would be up for a Beehivemanis�
So would I, but I think this year's home season may be over, or will be
next week. We could keep it on the back burner for next year...
glenn
|
29.1873 | McCoy Stadium is fun too. And cheap! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:50 | 1 |
|
|
29.1874 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:58 | 12 |
| > > Hey 'Sawmain, I would be up for a Beehivemanis�
>
> So would I, but I think this year's home season may be over, or will be
> next week. We could keep it on the back burner for next year...
Yes, most definitely.
The thing I like is that you are SO CLOSE to the action. I mean, you
can almost smell the leather, and you really do hear the pop of the
ball in the catcher's mitt....
'Sa
|
29.1875 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:31 | 5 |
| They actually serve Samuel Adams beer there 'Saw? Seems like
the beer gets better as you work your way down from the majors through
the minor league chain.
/Don
|
29.1876 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:33 | 17 |
| > They actually serve Samuel Adams beer there 'Saw? Seems like
> the beer gets better as you work your way down from the majors through
> the minor league chain.
Yes.
Bud, Bud Light, Coors, Coors Light, O'Douls and Samuel Adams.
Everything but Sammy is $2 for 16oz, Sammy is $3 for 16oz....
You do have to be 21 to buy O'Douls, but we figured that's because there's
no way to tell what you have in the cup (it all looks like beer) so
by limiting it, they cut they're liability....
'Saw
|
29.1877 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:34 | 4 |
| At McCoy they serve a 20oz. beer for $3.00. Fenway beer sips
bigtime, as do the Sox.
/Don
|
29.1878 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:49 | 11 |
| Well I called in a request to Bob Starr to whistle " Leaving on a
Jet Plane" to Jack Clark on the team bus to the airport. Seems he did
a thorough job cleaning out his locker including name plate.
However let's not jump the gun, though. My main main, Link da Fence,
told me that Jack was seen sneakin' into a pawn shop on LaGrange St.
looking for some weekend scratch.
MikeL
|
29.1879 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:56 | 10 |
|
And the winner of the "Person Most In Need Of A Reality Smack
Award" is...
According to this morning's Globule, apparently Wade Boggs is bummed
that the Sox aren't willing to talk to him about a contract approach-
ing that of Cal Ripken's.
|
29.1880 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Aug 28 1992 13:00 | 6 |
| Rat on Tommy,
Purty soon ol' Wade'll be talkin' in the third person agin.
Maybe he needs Margo or somethin'
MikeL
|
29.1881 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 13:10 | 3 |
| I think Boggs *should* made Ripken money..
Billy Ripken.
|
29.1882 | Says Sen. Bentson..... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | RAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!! | Fri Aug 28 1992 13:19 | 3 |
|
Wade I know Cal Ripken, and Believe me Wade your no Cal Ripken
|
29.1883 | This O's fan nominates .1881 for note of the week! | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Aug 28 1992 14:17 | 1 |
|
|
29.1884 | Yes, Boggs has become deluded, confused, bitter... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 14:41 | 14 |
|
Wade is hosed right now, badly. He will not even be offered what the
Red Sox "insulted" him with before this year. Not only has he stunk it
up this season but last year's excellent performance will put him over
the ratings hump and make him a Type A free agent, requiring
first-round draft pick compensation. At this point in time the Red Sox
will probably prefer the draft picks to Wade at almost *any* price, and
there will be little push from others to give up theirs.
I suspect that Wade will attempt to single out his agent for this
miscalculation over the winter...
glenn
|
29.1885 | Somebody else's Jack Clark | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Fri Aug 28 1992 15:01 | 11 |
| RE: Boggs
The thing that makes me wonder is if the guy is washed up or not. Early last
season it looked like he was going down, but then he had a good second half.
Thised year that is not happening. You would think he would do the typical
major league "dialing for dollars" in his free agent year.
There will likely be SOME ML team willing to pay him $4mil/year, but I wonder if
they wouldn't be getting hosed.
=Bob=
|
29.1886 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Fri Aug 28 1992 15:04 | 5 |
|
anybody who would pay Wade Boggs 4 million is in serious need of help or looking
for a tax write off....
the wimpy singles hitter this side of the planet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
29.1887 | I hope | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Fri Aug 28 1992 15:07 | 4 |
| �anybody who would pay Wade Boggs 4 million is in serious need of help or looking
�for a tax write off....
There will be somebody stoopid enough...
|
29.1888 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 15:41 | 25 |
| I personally would hate to see Boggs sign anywhere else!!! Further, I
think he would be a valuable addition to ANY team in Major League
Baseball.....and well worth whatever price it would take to sign him!!
He may be a singles hitter, but he is one of the GREATEST singles
hitters to ever play the game....and one poor season (average to the
majority of big league players) does not officially signal the end of a
TREMENDOUS career. Further, I find it to be a manager's shortcoming
that a lifetime .340+ hitter with a .400+ OBP did not contribute more
to his team.
"Hey Tom (Kelly), I've got a guy that will hit .340 for you and get on
base 45% of the time......problem is, he's mostly a singles hitter,
although he's led the league in doubles numerous times.......you
interested?"
Everyone of the BoSox managers has s*cked in my opinion because they
were unable to figure out a way to use such incredible numbers to their
team's advantage!!
Substitute .300 for the .340 and .370 for the OBP and the numbers still
warrant interest and big $$$$.
Nelly
|
29.1889 | would Lou Gorman qualify for stupid enough? | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:05 | 0 |
29.1890 | ...and Jack the whiffer too! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:20 | 2 |
| Absolutely! That's why he'll probably be back.
Denny
|
29.1891 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:20 | 18 |
| Fans scream for loyalty from the local players and teams. There was a
huge outcry when Bruce Hurst decided to jump ship. However, when a key
contributor to a number of decent Sox season starts to slip (OK,
plummet), those same fans don't show any loyalty in return.
Boggs probably won't get his big bucks due to market conditions and a
bad year. He hasn't tried to renegotiate contracts despite all his
silver bats. It could be argued that he was underpaid for a good
portion of his career. Do you think Ripken or Sandberg are actually
being paid for what they are expected to produce over the next 5 years?
No, they are being paid for what they've done over the past X years.
Ripken and Sandberg got the money they got because they represent their
team, i.e. they put butts in the stands. Puckett will probably stay in
Minnesota for the same reason. Boston has Clemens for that and he's
paid accordingly.
I'm surprised Tommy is so down on Boggs because there are alot of
similarities between him and Rice.
|
29.1892 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:24 | 4 |
| Rice played in pain BigMac. Boggs always had troublesome injuries
late in the season, if someone was close for the batting title.
/Don
|
29.1893 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:25 | 7 |
| I hear ya Mac, but I also don't feel that Sandberg and Ripkin deserve to be the
highest paid players in MLB. Sandberg particularly has been a solid performer
for a number of years, but IMHO is not the best player in baseball. So as far
as the loyalty thang goes, it's one thing to pay someone for past service, but
another to make him the highest paid player in the game for it.
=Bob=
|
29.1894 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:33 | 11 |
| re .1893:
A big reason for the high value of Sandberg and Ripken is the positions
they play. Middle infielders have been traditionally looked at as
glove men first, and any offense they provide is a bonus. Ryno and Cal
provide 20+ HRs annually to go along with Gold Glove caliber IF defense,
making them highly prized commodities...their value probably wouldn't
be as high if they played, say, first base or outfield.
py
|
29.1895 | Those are the breaks, that's all... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:36 | 17 |
|
Until very recently (another reason why his value has diminished),
Wade Boggs put in full seasons, not these 130-gamers a lot of these
so-called franchise players average now. The "lack of toughness"
label does not apply to Wade Boggs.
Boggs has missed the big-bucks contract window on a couple of
occasions, no question about it. The last time it was immediately
after collusion, right before salaries exploded. But there's really
nothing that can be done about it now, nor should anyone shed any
tears over Wade Boggs' financial situation (the lack of respect for
what he did in the glory years is another matter entirely). The Red
Sox just are not in a position, financially and on the field, to be
handing out lifetime achievement awards...
glenn
|
29.1896 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:48 | 34 |
| Nelly - Great note!
I've got to think about a guy named Ken Oberkfell. Played for the
Cards, Braves and a few others. Always seemed to find someone willing
to trade for or buy his services.
Ken Oberkfell doesn't even approach Wade Boggs in talent.
Boggs may be on the way down. Perhaps he doesn't get the right message
from Hobson. Perhaps the Sox are actually serious about building with
youth and Boggs isn't comfortable with it. Perhaps Burleson is screwing
with Boggs and Boggs is being kind in not airing the issue. Perhaps he
is genuinely slower, his refelxes have dimmed and his eyesight is
blurred.
The fact remains that, during the 80's, Boggs and Tony Gwynn were the
premier contact hitters in all of baseball. For nearly a decade, these
2 guys dominated pitchers. And, even with lofty credentials like that,
Boggs was stiffed time and again at contract time.
Admitted, Boggs was not the RBI man that, say, Mattingly was. But, I
don't think that was ever supposed to be his job. And, frankly, it is
one area of his game he could never master.
He developed into a damned good 3rd baseman. He has begun to fade on
the field these days but so have other stars.
Because of his off field antics, his unbelievable ego and the fact that
he plays 1/2 his games in Fenway, he will be derided, downrated and
sneered at. He deserves some of it. But, he also deserves recognition
as the best hitter in the AL during the 80's.
\
Rich
|
29.1897 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:57 | 5 |
| Sandberg and Ripken aren't being paid for being 'the best players in
baseball'. They're only the 'best players who's contracts happened to
expire last season.' This years 'best players' will be Puckett and
Bonds, and whoever elses contract is up.
denny
|
29.1898 | It's like with Larry Bird; it's because they're special... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 28 1992 17:17 | 16 |
|
Sandberg and Ripken were both paid heavily for the loyalty factor and
due to fan pressure. Ripken is 32, Sandberg 33. Middle infielders
or no, neither will be worth their salaries *based on performance* in
the last couple of years of their contracts, if not earlier, and I
don't think even their clubs are dumb enough to believe otherwise (look
at Ripken's numbers at the time the contract was signed-- they're
horrible, not much better than Boggs', and it's his worst season ever).
Ripken even got an incredible one-way option for the last two years,
where if he doesn't produce the Orioles still have to pay him $6
million a year, but if somehow he's worth more at that time he can
walk! I'm a big Cal Ripken fan, but even I didn't think that
one-directional show of loyalty was right...
glenn
|
29.1899 | | DECWET::METZGER | Hello...ello...lo...o...o... | Fri Aug 28 1992 17:36 | 30 |
|
Wade Boggs was never stiffed during contract negotiations. He signed
his contracts willingly. Nobody put a gun to his head and said "You
have to play for $x"
Wade Boggs Has always gotten his due for being a great singles hitter.
Nobody ever said the guy couldn't hit the ball. He's gotten criticism
for failing to adjust to game situations, never hitting for power, never
driving in runs and poor baserunning. Whether these are valid criticisms
or not can be argued ad nauseum...
Wade Boggs is not currently worth what he thinks he is. He's never been
the Sox drawing card like Ripken and Sandberg are. He's always been over
shadowed by Rice and then Clemens. Financially speaking you pay the
big bucks to young superstars or older drawing cards...you don't break
the bank for aging, slipping veteran players that might rebound...
I cry not for Wade Boggs. He's made a great living out of playing ball.
He will be employed next season albeit not at the price he thinks he
is worth....
Clemens is the only player currently on the Sox who people try and see.
You'll see more of this in the future. Teams will sign certain players
for big $$$ and then try and sign the rest of the roster to low paying
contracts...
Metz
|
29.1900 | | FDCV06::KING | | Fri Aug 28 1992 23:58 | 8 |
| Boggs is not worth 5 mil a year... 3.5 at the max... You will see
salaries start to scale back for 2-3 tier players like Boggs, Gwynn,
Whitacre, Sabo, Davis etc.. The big money TV contract has expired and
the networks are not going to pay big bucks out when the super-stations
are broadcasting the same game. The Superstars will get the bucks but
the rest will get alot less...
REK
|
29.1901 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:07 | 8 |
| Didn't see the paper, but heard on the radio that Reardon (aka Dan
Schneider) was traded.
To who, for whom?
thanks,
'Saw
|
29.1902 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:08 | 5 |
| Yeah baseball's really popular these days. last Sat. (8/22) CBS
passes up baseball for exhibition football! Now I like football 10
times as much as baseball. but considering the bucks CBS's paying, it's
crazy.
Denny
|
29.1903 | Reardon is a Brave | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:08 | 4 |
| He was traded to Atlanta for two PTBNL.
Dennis Faust
|
29.1904 | | CAMONE::WAY | Crucial Taunt | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:11 | 15 |
| > He was traded to Atlanta for two PTBNL.
>
> Dennis Faust
Thanks Dennis.
Gee, sounds like the Cone deal.
Watch for Reardon to catch on fire now that he's out of Boston....
'Saw
|
29.1905 | 2 minor leaguers | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:17 | 9 |
| The two PTBNL both are minor league players. One is a pitcher
with a ERA of ~2.5, winning record. I don't recall eggzactly
if the other is a SS or an outfielder.
Supposedly Hotlanta has a fairly strong farm system.
hth,
Kev
|
29.1906 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Mon Aug 31 1992 09:29 | 5 |
|
Look for a new stat to be created for relievers: Blown Pennants.
Dickstah
|
29.1907 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Aug 31 1992 10:14 | 35 |
| >> The two PTBNL both are minor league players. One is a pitcher
>> with a ERA of ~2.5, winning record. I don't recall eggzactly
>> if the other is a SS or an outfielder.
There are 2 pitchers on the Richmond roster that meet this description.
One is David Nied who has a tremendous amount of talent and who Atlanta
has been showing great interest in. The other is Armando Reynoso who
has had a couple cups of coffee in the bigs, is in his mid-late 20's
and who, last year, won the IL ERA title. Nied throws hard and is
learning to throw a curve more effectively. Reynoso relies on control
more.
The starting SS for the Richmond Braves is Vinny Castilla. The guy can
hit but is an adventure in the field. Very erratic glove, limited
range, string arm. Outfielders include Kieth Mitchel (currently hitting
around .220) Andy Tomberlain (although he excels in McCoy Stadium
versus the Pawsox, he has been nothing more than a Sam Bowen/Garry
Hancock clone down here), Sean Ross (pretty good speed, some power,
great glove, weak arm) and, for the life of me, I can't recall the 4th
outfielder who has a great bat, better than average speed, good arm and
glove. With the exception of Tomberlain, all Braves outfielders are
threats to steal.
If you got questions on any Braves' prospects, let me know and, if I
don't get TFSO'd, I'll keep you up to date.
>> Supposedly Hotlanta has a fairly strong farm system.
Yes, I think they are strong. They don't have the team talent of
Columbus or Scraton-Wilkes-Barre in the IL but some of their individual
players are really something. Chris Chambliss has shown to be a really
postive influence on these kids.
Rich
|
29.1908 | Not bad, considering Reardon has no value to the Sox | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 31 1992 10:37 | 9 |
|
The players rumored to be coming to Boston are 25-year-old Sean Ross
(forget it, non-prospect) and 23-year-old RHP Nate Minchey (excellent
stats at AA Greenville, control pitcher, not overpowering). Second
baseman Ramon Carabello was also mentioned by ESPN, but he's probably a
bit too much of a prospect for the Braves to give up for Reardon...
glenn
|
29.1909 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Aug 31 1992 10:45 | 17 |
| Ross "could" be something. He has more power than Wayne Housie but
lacks dicipline at the plate.
Caraballo would have been a great deal for the Sox. He's tiny, but
can run with the wind. Steals bases like mad. Made instant impact upon
being called up from Greenville.
Have not heard anything in Richmond papers about Nate Minchey. And we
usually do get advance notice on AA prospects. We heard raves about
Klesko last year and, this year, heard alot about Caraballo. Now we
read alot about Chipper Jones.
I guess I agree with Glenn's assessment on Ross, though. Certainly not
much to get excited about.
Rich
|
29.1910 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 02 1992 10:40 | 2 |
| Roger Clemens was named AL pitcher of the month for August. During the
month Roger went 5-1 with a 1.90 ERA, 3 complete games, and 1 shutout.
|
29.1911 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Sep 02 1992 10:54 | 6 |
| So what's the verdict on Matt Young?
Is Lou gonna now want him back because of a couple of ok games?
I hear he tossed a pickoff attempt away agin. That's the Matt both
we Bosox and Mariners fans know.
|
29.1912 | big deal who'd beat Cleveland and the Yankmees? | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:07 | 2 |
|
Jack Morris got robbed!!!! Atleast the BlueJays games mean something...
|
29.1913 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:30 | 13 |
|
> Jack Morris got robbed!!!! Atleast the BlueJays games mean something...
Morris 33.0 IP 4-1 3.55 ERA
Clemens 47.1 IP 5-1 1.90 ERA
Update on Matt Young:
Still winless since May, 1991, and still a member of the Boston Red
Sox, for some inexplicable reason...
glenn
|
29.1914 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:43 | 7 |
|
And Jack Morris' has 18 wins with an ERA over 4.00. Just shows to
go ya why the number of wins should *not* carry the most weight when
it comes to Cy Young votes.
Dickstah
|
29.1915 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:49 | 13 |
| Dickstah -
I tend to disagree. Morris is pitching in the pressure of a pennant race -
and has all year. The closest Roger has had to pressure was running out
of rice to exercise his arm in.
The Sox are out of it. Roger is doing well. Jack Morris is 6-1 in his last
7 starts - all at a time when the Jays have been struggling, and have had
Guzman out with injuries. Roger has wet dreams that he could perform
like Morris does under pressure. See last year's world series for more
proof.
JD
|
29.1916 | has he blown any saves this year? | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:53 | 9 |
|
I thought I saw on ESPN that Morris was also 5-1 in August? So Clemens
has a better ERA big deal. Morris is carrying Toronto on his back to
the playoffs maybe. Clemens is just inflating his stats against a bunch
of loosers in meaningless games.
as for the CY....I say give it to the ECK!!!!
mike
|
29.1917 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:55 | 3 |
| I agree with Mike. If Dennis Eckersly doesn't win the Cy Young, its a travesty.
JD
|
29.1918 | Th' Eck deserves Cy | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Wed Sep 02 1992 11:56 | 6 |
| � as for the CY....I say give it to the ECK!!!!
Cain't argue with that. Unitil the other day against Boston, NO (zero, nada,
zip) inherited runners had scored agianst the guy ALL SEASON.
=Bob=
|
29.1919 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:10 | 5 |
| Well, I just hope you guys are consistent when your favorite player has
a great season playing for a lousy team and he doesn't get an award for
it.
John
|
29.1920 | Yeah, the Sox stink so Clemens should take the rap... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:15 | 21 |
|
Of course Dennis Eckersley himself says that the Cy Young Award belongs
to mainly-main 250-IP starting pitchers, not one-inning guys. Even if
the Eck had blown five or six saves (instead of his one) like the
average reliever and the A's had gone on to lose most of those games,
they'd still in first place with room to spare. Somebody's got to get
him that lead before he goes to work.
Pressure or no pressure, the Blue Jays are scoring more runs for Jack
Morris than for their other starters. Last I checked, the DH rule was
still in effect and Morris doesn't bring his bat to the plate, so what
accounts for the difference? Can you say "luck"?
If Roger Clemens finishes up with 20+ wins and an ERA hovering around
2.00 over his 270-280 innings and wins the Cy Young, it will be
controversial but no travesty. Not until they change the rules to
state that "only players from division winners are eligible for
postseason awards".
glenn
|
29.1921 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:16 | 10 |
| � -< has he [ECK] blown any saves this year? >-
Yup, 2, one of them came in the last Boston/A's series.
I guess you guys don't think that keeping a Boston team out of the
cellar is a pressure situation.
Put Jack Morris on any other team (except maybe the A's) and he'd
probably be a .500 pitcher this year (case in point - Frank Viola).
Put Roger Clemens on they Jays and he'd probably be undefeated.
|
29.1922 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:22 | 6 |
| �I agree with Mike. If Dennis Eckersly doesn't win the Cy Young, its a travesty.
JD, I thought you didn't put much worth into those wimpy save rules.
Mike C., I'm surprised you're throwing your support behind a guy who
isn't a mainly-main, 250+ innings/year pitcher.
|
29.1923 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:47 | 6 |
|
Jack Morris getting a win in 8-4 games is more a reflection on his
team, not the pitcher.
Dickstah
|
29.1924 | Was this 1966?? | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:01 | 4 |
| When was the last time the Red Sox finsished the season under .500??
The Crazy Met
|
29.1925 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:07 | 4 |
| Nope. It was either 1987 or 1989. I don't have the records in front
of me so I can't say for sure. Before then, it was 1983.
John
|
29.1926 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:27 | 4 |
| C'mon Mac, you should know that Mike will support anyone that's going
up against the Rocket! :*)
lEe
|
29.1927 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:30 | 7 |
| An E.R.A. of 4 is pretty hefty and considering the Jays defense
is one of the better ones, I would guess there are no cheapies.
The only reason Toronto is in a pennant race is because they've
consistently underperformed all year. I say congrats to Rajah on
a well deserved award.
/Don
|
29.1928 | undressed again by Dinz's buddy | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Wed Sep 02 1992 14:57 | 7 |
|
LEe, unless you got something useful to add to the argument butt out will
ya!!!
;^) lots of em'
mike
|
29.1929 | Rocket will grab # 4 | ROULET::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Wed Sep 02 1992 15:15 | 7 |
| re. Until against Boston says it all......no Cy for Eck......giving
up runs to Boston of all teams....
Roger should start making room on his mantle for # 4....
Tom
|
29.1930 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Sep 02 1992 15:56 | 7 |
| Yep,
Rog might git a few more before he's done, and unless he gits goin
elsewhere, don't look like he'sd gonna have that cherished Ring
to center his mantlepiece.
MikeL
|
29.1931 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Wed Sep 02 1992 17:20 | 24 |
| Clemens is #2 in the AL in strikeouts - 1 behind Perez.
Clemens has one of the 5 lowest ERA's of AL starters.
Clemens is only 2 wins behind the winningest pitcher in ther AL.
Clemens had 3 or 4 games blown by his bullpen.
Clemens is pitching for a team with the lowest BA in the AL, lowest
runs produced and lowest # of HR's.
Clemens pitches for a team not known for it's defense.
I think if you took his stats for 1992 and applied them to a pitcher
for the Mariners, Phillies or Angels, you'd have to say he desrves the
Cy Young, hands down.
But because he is Roger Clemens and because he has an "attitude", some
will never appreciate what this guy has done this year.
Oh, by the way, how many 1-0 games has Clemens won or lost this year?
Rich
|
29.1932 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 02 1992 17:42 | 8 |
|
> Oh, by the way, how many 1-0 games has Clemens won or lost this year?
I think he's won one (two-hitter against Minnesota and Scott Erickson),
lost none.
glenn
|
29.1933 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 03 1992 09:51 | 10 |
|
Roger wins! Roger wins! Now tops in the league in major pitching
statistics! ("wins" is a minor category, since his performance
had nothing to do with a few of his losses.) He should have 5 starts
left, 6 if they pitch him every fifth day, not every fifth game. The
quest for the Cy is about the only thing about the Sox worth caring
about. How about that.
Dickstah
|
29.1934 | Okay, how many 2-0 games has Roger lost this year? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:06 | 1 |
|
|
29.1935 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:14 | 21 |
| Well the one thing you guys are proving is my theory that Sox fans don't care
about the team as long as one of the players brings home some sort of
trophy.
If Roger Clemens was 0-20, the Sox would be in last place. Guess what. They are
still in last place. Big f'ing deal.
I recall one year (was it 86?) that old Roger had unreal run support. I don't
remember any of you dudes whining about it then.
As I've said before. Roger has never strapped a team on his back to a
champeenship - things Frank Voila, Orel, and Morris have all done. Heck
Bruce Hurst almost did it as a Sox.
Ah yes "We finished last. Who cares, Rocket won the Cy - wicked pisser awesome!"
BTW, to Rich Brake. If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned - he
wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young. And you can take that to the
bank.
JD
|
29.1936 | I see that JD is back to drinking coffee again... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:23 | 1 |
|
|
29.1937 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:26 | 4 |
| Who said the Sox fans don't care about the team? I read where
Dickstah said that seeing as how they're in last, all that's left to
root for is the Cy! So what?
Denny
|
29.1938 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:32 | 70 |
| >>Well the one thing you guys are proving is my theory that Sox fans don't
>>care about the team as long as one of the players brings home some sort of
>>trophy.
Wrong, JD. You fail to collect the brass monkey. Don't you think Cubs
fans were rooting for Andre Dawson to win the MVP while their team was
going nowhere?
I'm surprised at you. You have lived through pennant races in Boston
before and you know the enthusiasm it elicits. Winning the pennant is
the most important thing to Sox fans. Hey, a Series cahmpeenship would
be nice, too.
But, hey,. the team stinks and we have a legitimate HoF pitcher. There
is nothing else to root foor, realistically. The Sox have no chance mto
overtake the Brewers, let alone the Jays and O's. They don't treat the
fans to exciting baseball by stealing bases. They don't put dents in
the OF walls. They DO have one of the best pitchers of this era,
though, and this pitcher is putting up pretty good numbers. He has a
chance to win the Cy.
So, what is the crime in getting excited about this?
>>I recall one year (was it 86?) that old Roger had unreal run support.
>>I don't remember any of you dudes whining about it then.
What's your point? What was his ERA?
>>As I've said before. Roger has never strapped a team on his back to a
>>champeenship - things Frank Voila, Orel, and Morris have all done. Heck
>>Bruce Hurst almost did it as a Sox.
Well, JD, I guess you don't think very much of Bob Feller, huh? I guess
a pitcher has to have played for a WS champ to get your seal of
approval.
Heck, Lew Burdette won 3 WS games one year. Was he better then than
Roger is today? Does Burdette deserve more recognition than Spahn
because of this WS thang?
The list you provided....I'll give you Morris. He was one of the few
bright spots on the Tigers for years. He is there, year in and year
out. But Orel? What has he done lately? Viola did, indeed, have a
wonderful year with the Twins that year. Sort of like Jim Lonborg from
'67.
But, JD, would you really rather have Clemens or Lonborg? Not for one
season but for a career. Clemens has put forth his numbers over a
career in the smallest ballpark in baseball.
>>Ah yes "We finished last. Who cares, Rocket won the Cy - wicked pisser
>>awesome!"
Where do you see this? What paper was it in? I know you are being
facetious but I think it really is a little ridiculous.
>>BTW, to Rich Brake. If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned
>> - he wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young. And you can take
>>that to the bank
Well, JD, I obviously would invest in a bank you recommended. Clearly
you think only players from major markets get notoriety. I guess I can
live with the fact you have this bias and I won't try to change your
mind. I'll only say, categorically, you are WRONG!
Have a nice day.
Rich
|
29.1939 | So sue me already | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:33 | 8 |
|
So, what's so wrong about rooting for the home-town guy to excel and be
chosen the best pitcher in the game? Is it detrimental to my health
or something? Does it mean I don't care about the rest of the team?
Nope.
Dickstah
|
29.1940 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 03 1992 10:36 | 10 |
| >>BTW, to Rich Brake. If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned
>> - he wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young. And you can take
>>that to the bank
I'd maybe agree about the Mariners -- look where Edgar Martinez
finished in the All-Star voting -- but not about the Angels or
Phillies, they play in major markets (LA and Philly).
py
|
29.1941 | Gits mighty boring in Wilton, eh JD? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Thu Sep 03 1992 13:30 | 1 |
|
|
29.1942 | | QETOO::TIMMONS | | Thu Sep 03 1992 13:41 | 6 |
| Stirrin' the pot again, eh JD? :*)
Roger is a bum, pure and simple. Trade the bum to, ahh, err, let's
see, Detroit. Yeah, that's the ticket, Detroit.
lEe
|
29.1943 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Sep 03 1992 13:50 | 4 |
| I hope you don't think I was picking on you Dickstah. I was asking
JD what was wrong with your note. You certainly weren't being anti-team
as JD says 'some' (though he doesn't say who) are.
Denny
|
29.1944 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:20 | 12 |
|
> I hope you don't think I was picking on you Dickstah. I was asking
Not at all, Mr. Denny.
My note in all fairness did say that Clemens' winning the Cy was the
only thing about the Sox to care about. A more apt choice of words
might be "the only thing about the Sox worth getting excited about"
at this point of the season.
Dickstah
|
29.1945 | Can relate | SHALOT::HUNT | Last one out, hit the lights | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:36 | 20 |
| There's nothing inherently *wrong* in setting your sights on an individual
player's award potential after your team has bagged it for the year. I
have years of experience in that department with the most famous example
being Steve Carlton's 1972 season where he won 27 games with a 1.92 ERA
and 300+ whiffs for the dead, deader, deadest lasted-placed Phils.
Believe me, he was the one and only reason to watch the Phillies try to
play baseball that year.
It's when your team was expected to do well and doesn't even come close
that individual awards seem somehow less then extra special. Clemens has
had yet another monster season on the mound. There isn't a GM in any
league in the world who wouldn't give his left filbert to have Roger on
his team. He's easily the most valuable pitcher on the planet with the
possible exception of a properly utilized Dennis Eckersley.
But the BoSox have become the BoSux and even Roger's 4th Cy Young Award
... which would tie him with the afore-mentioned Mr Carlton ... will seem
like very weak icing on a truly horrid cake.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1946 | I predict that a team much better than the Red Sox wins it all | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:42 | 27 |
|
Let's break this down to see if we can detect a pattern:
1991-- Roger is good, but he's no Jack Morris.
1990-- Roger is good, but he's no Jose Rijo (sidebar: what a choke
artist that Dave Stewart is!).
1989-- Roger is good, but he's no Dave Stewart.
1988-- Roger is good, but he's no Orel Hershiser.
1987-- Roger is good, but he's no Frank Viola.
Hmmmm, what do we see? It seems that every year an outstanding team
wins a championship, and that team usually features one outstanding
pitcher. But every year this pitcher seems to be different, and in
some years today's goat was yesterday's hero! Could it be that logic
dictates that one team will win the World Series (with the aid of an
ace pitcher), regardless of how high (1991) or how low (1989) the
overall level of play might be? Is it "clutch", or is it simply
inevitable that one team and its players must necessarily prevail?
My challenge: who will be this year's postseason goats? This year's
hero? What happens to past assumptions if Jack Morris gets shelled
this year? And, who will be the next pitcher that Roger Clemens
can't hope to touch before quickly disappearing from baseball's
pinnacle?
glenn
|
29.1947 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:49 | 26 |
| Before the season started, I said that Sox fans seem more interested in
'trophies' by individuals than a champeenship. The usual cabal shouted
me down. I said I could guarentee if the Sox were in the bag, that the cries
of 'so what, so and so will win the Cy Young, batting title, etc..."
Again, the cabal shouted me down.
History has borne me out. I was correct. The same cabal shouts me down
again. Many of the same folks that I remember criticizing Andre Dawson's
selection as MVP (they would have finished out of it without him..) - the
same arguement is pooh-poohed by this almight and righteous cabal.
Yes, criticize other organizations. Criticize other fans. Other players.
Just don't touch the Sox or Roger.
And I'll repeat - this horrible season will be justified, and to some, be
considered a success, if Roger hauls in another trophy.
Regarding Rich Brake - Rich, give me a one year wonder that leads my team
to a champeenship over a multi-year chokes under pressure but gets the individual
stats and trophies ANY day of the week.
iI'll take Bruce Hurst's 1986 Postseason (Esp. W.S.) pitching over anything
ROger >Clemens has ever done.
JD
|
29.1948 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:55 | 13 |
| re .1945
Excellent note, Bob. I guess, using JD's logic, Steve Carlton and the
Philly fans aren't worth a hoot. I mean, obviously, Philly fans
contented themselves with Left's heroics over the team. And, how many
teams did Carlton "carry on his back" to a world championship?
Heck, Carlton pitched in the '67 Series against the Red Sox and was
outshined by Bob Gibson. So, clearly, Carlton was not really much of a
pitcher "~).
Rich
|
29.1949 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:57 | 24 |
| Yeah, but doing that stuff JD, is natural.
I mean, if I were a fan of the St. Louis Brown's, I'm SURE that I would
have looked for something to cheer about, even if it was a pitcher
who was pitching really well.
There's not a Sox fan in here who'd RATHER have Roger win a Cy Young than
a championship. But hey, I've seen championship teams and I can tell you
that these Red Sox are NOT a championship team. So, we look for
other things to root for.
It's kind of like in a sporting match, if you're horrendously down, you
start working on things for next week. (Like in rugby, if we're losing
by 40, then you kind of start trying out new things).
So maybe I watch to see who they bring up from Pawtucket or whatever.
Believe me, no one wants a champeenship more than a Sox fan. But in that
abscence I can still root for Roger to win the Cy Young....
'Saw
|
29.1950 | One more | SALEM::DODA | MA:Home of the Indictment | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:09 | 5 |
| Glenn,
Don't forget 1986 and Gooden comparison.
daryll
|
29.1951 | I just wanted 1950! (my birth year! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:10 | 1 |
|
|
29.1952 | rats! missed again! :*( | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:10 | 1 |
|
|
29.1953 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:22 | 28 |
| First, the fundamental flaw in Rich Brake's, and others, anti-JD comments are
that I have not said that Roger is an inferior pitcher, or a bad pitcher. He's
a great pitcher. Howwever, IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
to me as a Sox fan. Nothing. Nada.
I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4 and
get another piece of hardware.
Only thing I can compare it to are the New York Football Giants. Always a
die hard fan - but as the 80's rolled around, I wanted a winner. Not a 9-7
team. But a Super Bowl winner. I didn't care about individual awards, stats,
etc. Sure, its nice to have top players. But after 30 years of no champeenships
I was fed up (as were many Giants fans - who had done things like burn season
tickets, hire planes to circle the stadium...). And the Giants produced
a champeenship. Everything after that was gravy (I.E. individual awards).
With Sox fans, it seems that instead of getting angry at the absolute undeniable
fact that it has been a damn LONG time since a champeenship banner was raised, -
they take solace in individual accomplishments, like Roger going for the Cy.
No, a team can't win a champeenship every year. But once every 50 or so
years would be nice, no?
As for Darryl Doda - Gooden sucked in the 86 series, and I've never said otherwise.
So bark up another tree.
JD
|
29.1954 | Ring first, Individual second | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:39 | 16 |
| Hey JD,
Bark, bark, woof, snarl, grrrr. 8^),
I don't think ANY Sox fan in here has stated that we prefer individual
achievements over the Enchilada. When that Enchilada is obviously
a meal for someone else, it's nice to follow someone's quest, however
it pales to the Ultimate, for individual mastery in a lost season.
Individual stats in the end, mean nothing in comparison to the Series,
but it proves that said player is great at what he does. In the end
Roger himself, as well as us, would tell ya the Cy's mean nothing,
in comparison, to the Ring. But in a game where comparison to your
peers becomes important, I think a Cy Young for Roger is a worthy
goal, albeit a subgoal.
MikeL
|
29.1955 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | I need a bambulance | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:40 | 7 |
|
OK, JD, show us one, just one, Sox fan who says they would rather have
Roger win the Cy then the Sox win the WS. Feel free to choose among
the myriad of notesfiles or news reports you have available to you. If
you can find just one, maybe someone else will agree with you.
Brews
|
29.1956 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:41 | 49 |
| >IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
>to me as a Sox fan. Nothing. Nada.
IMO, it doesn't come close to winning a champeenship, but it's only
natural that a fan who can't root for a championship will look at other
possible things to root for. Nothing wrong with rooting for and hoping
that Rogers gets the Cy Young.
>I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4 and
>get another piece of hardware.
Ditto. But that's kind of backwards. We're not saying we'd rather have
Roger win the Cy Young that get a series, rather that since we ain't gonna
win the Series, it'd be nice if we could see Roger get the Cy Young.
>Only thing I can compare it to are the New York Football Giants. Always a
>die hard fan - but as the 80's rolled around, I wanted a winner. Not a 9-7
>team. But a Super Bowl winner. I didn't care about individual awards, stats,
>etc. Sure, its nice to have top players. But after 30 years of no champeenships
>I was fed up (as were many Giants fans - who had done things like burn season
>tickets, hire planes to circle the stadium...). And the Giants produced
>a champeenship. Everything after that was gravy (I.E. individual awards).
Again, ditto.
But through those years when they were playing at 3-11, or 3-12-1, or
worse, you'd try to find something good about the Giants. Maybe it was
that they beat the Cowboys in one game. I remember one year they beat
the Cowboys something like 16-7 (i think) and we danced around the living
room like I did years later when they won the Bowl.
The WORST season for me as a Giants fan was the 9-5 season where they
lost to the Ram 31-3 in the last game and miss the playoffs. It was easier
for me to deal with 3-11 or 5-9, than in having them come so close....
No Sox fan would rather have Roger get the Cy Young instead of the team
get the Ring.....
'Saw
|
29.1957 | | SALEM::DODA | MA:Home of the Indictment | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:42 | 19 |
| JD, show me where I attributed anything to you in my reply.
Fact: In 1986, the debate raged in here as to who the better
pitcher was Gooden or Clemens. It fit in very well with Glenn's
comparisons.
Clemens deserves the Cy Young based on HIS performance this year
not the team's record. As a baseball fan, I'll be happy if he
gets justifiably recognized by getting the Cy this year. (How
convienently you sidestep the Carlton comparison.)
I'm glad you happen to have your finger on the pulse of the
majority of Red Sox fans (in MA? the NE? the world?, who knows?).
Guess those of us in here that happen to disagree with you are
the minority.
Take a pill.
daryll
|
29.1958 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:44 | 2 |
| Jd just likes yankin' chains, he won't (can't) back it up.
Denny
|
29.1959 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Roger Clemems, what a waste of disk space | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:00 | 9 |
|
I think if the red soxs fan look deep inside they'd hasve to admit JD's right.
They'd rather the individual award for Roger than a Championship. After all
first if the Soxs did win it all it would be a fluke, second people would be
drunk for days, some might even jump out of windows. Red Soxs fan are of the
kinda gentler variety and don't want to see anyone harm themselves...that's
why they prefer the individual award......
JD remember how proud they were when Rog won a Cy and Wadzie a BT????
|
29.1960 | Youse guys keep up this barking, and Hal will be here before you know it! | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:00 | 0 |
29.1961 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:01 | 23 |
| It's basically inferences. I dont' have the energy, nor the time, to go
through a few thousand notes in here, the Sox file, the Baseball file, or
through conversations with Sox fans while running 20 milers, at games, in
cars, on the phone, in airports, or hearing stuff on the radio.
I can let you guys go back to your Roger circle jerk.
But I'll use the standard arguement that I know I've seen Mac and others
use when saying 'so and so doesn't deserve the MVP'?
Where would the Sox be without Roger Clemens? Last Place.
For arguements sake, where would the Blue Jays be without Jack Morris (Hint,
not in 1st place.)
Where would the A's be without the Eck?
Or are you all too vain to admit that you are using double standards when
it comes to Roger?
Probably.
JD
|
29.1962 | Roger Clemson is no two BLAM! :-) | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:05 | 1 |
|
|
29.1963 | Then Morris/Eck deserve an MVP, not a CY | SALEM::DODA | MA:Home of the Indictment | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:08 | 0 |
29.1964 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:08 | 22 |
| Mike -
I've often wondered if Sox fans have taken '1918' and besides from false
bravado - actually revel in the fact they've gone so long without a champeenship.
(And to keep the hounds at bay, I have the same wonderings about Cubs fans...)
It's like a badge of honour. It helps with the aura of the team, the veneer
that is the Sox. It fits in with the staid New England Yankee image.
And a Champeenship may frighten some. Take some of the noteriety of going
70+ years with just a few sniffs of a real award, a real banner, a real trophy.
The Olde Towne Team - wiping out the legacy of 1918, and all that goes with
it (Harry Frazee and the Babe, Denny Galehouse, Enos Slaughter, Luis Aparachio
falling, Yaz' Triple Crown, Fisk's homor, Bucky Dent, Bill Buckner and Mookie)
- ripping the frabric out of the web that is essential to the 'real' Red
Sox fan.
All of those things would be pale memories of yesteryear if a champeenship
flag waved over Fenway.
JD
|
29.1965 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:10 | 6 |
| Darryl -
I believe the MVP should be for everyday players, and not once every 5 game
players.
JD
|
29.1966 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:11 | 63 |
| >>First, the fundamental flaw in Rich Brake's, and others, anti-JD comments
JD, first off, we have sparred in here on and off since at least 1986.
Why all of a sudden do you need to refer to me as Rich Brake? I sign my
notes "Rich". Seems we honor other noters by addressing them as they
sign themselves (Dickstah, 'Saw, /Don, dan'l, etc)... so I ask please
to refer to me as Rich.
Secondly, after reading over my notes in this string, I realize that I
was getting too aggresive towards you which is wrong. I apologize. I
guess my notes etiquette suffers somewhat since I don't have the
opportunity to note as much as I once did. Please accept my apologies.
>>Howwever, IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
>>to me as a Sox fan. Nothing. Nada.
Anyone who mdisagrees with this is NOT a Red Sox fan. I don't care if
nobody on the team hit a HR all year, if the team ERA is 10.95 and if
the Sox didn't steal 1 base. If they won a championship, THAT would be
the most important thing in the world to me vis a vis baseball.
>>I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4
>>and get another piece of hardware.
We are on the same wavelength here. Could not agree more
JD, your comparison to the NY football Giants is good but doesn't come
close to capturing the wait Red Sox fans have endured. I want a winner.
'Saw wants a winner. Denny, Jeff and all other Sox fans in here want a
winner. We want it more than a Triple Crown winner or Cy Young winner
or any other kind of individual winner.
>>With Sox fans, it seems that instead of getting angry at the absolute
>>undeniable fact that it has been a damn LONG time since a champeenship
>>banner was raised, - they take solace in individual accomplishments, like
>>Roger going for the Cy.
I'm angry, JD. I was angry at Zimmer, at Gorman. I was angry about the
Danny Cater for Sparky Lyle trade. I was angry about using Bob Baily as
a pinch hitter. I look at some of the inept managers - from Mike
Higgins to Billy Jurges to Johnny Pesky to Billy Herman. I lived with
this bunch through the 50's and early 60's. I felt a breath of fresh
air with Dick O'Connell and Dick Williams. I soared with the fortunes
of the team in '67 when they finally shed their losers image. I skipped
freshman classes in the '67 WS to watch Santiago throw thye first WS
pitch in Boston since 1946. Being there was MORE improtant than Yaz'
Triple Crown.
I see where you are coming from but I just don't see where any of us
Sox fans have indicated that a Cy for Roger is better than a
championship banner for the team. I have heard outrage in here about
Matt Young still being on the team. I've read about Jack Clark being
useless. I've read about disgust at the inactivity of the front office.
And, occasionally, in an effort to keep interest in the team alive,
fans have pointed to the one bright spot on the team...a reason to tune
in every 5th game for a glance at a professional.
Later,
Rich
|
29.1967 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:16 | 14 |
| JD,
As a Giants fan, winning the 1986 Super Bowl did not diminish the
angst of the years under Alex Webster, or the Fumble, or the
31-3 loss to the Rams and no playoff berth.
Quite the contrary. Winning the Championship was like what winning the
marathon must be like after ALL of those hundreds (thousands?) of
miles in the heat, the rain, the snow, the humidity. It heightens
the experience, brings them back to the front of your mind, and gives
them purpose.....
I'd rather have a Red Sox WS than anything. But I wouldn't want to
be in the City if it happens. Why the stampede alone would cause a quake....
|
29.1968 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:28 | 8 |
| Cy Young Award has always been for the best pitcher in the league and
not for most valuable pitcher. The place where a pitchers team finishes
should not have any real bearing on who wins the award. On the other
hand MVP .. well the name of the award says it all and thus an argument
can be made that a teams finish should be taken into account.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1969 | The award is irrelevant to actual achievement... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:28 | 22 |
|
For the record, I won't be upset if Roger Clemens doesn't win the Cy
Young and Dennis Eckersley does. I responded to JD's comments that it
would be "a travesty" if he does. That's far from not caring if Roger
wins the award; it's taking a strong position against such a thought!
So who exactly is it that's pre-occupied with the possibility? Once
again, the illogical position that rooting for a team and a player on
a team are mutually exclusive is proffered, and JD gets the reaction he
wants. Yawn...
The reason that I'm not too worried about the award is that Clemens is
the same pitcher (I believe the undisputed best pitcher in baseball)
whether he wins it or not. I enjoy watching him perform, regardless
of what some group of writers think of his performance in the abstract.
And yes, as a Red Sox fan at this point in this lost season I am much
more interested in their trade and free agent prospects for the
off-season (damn I wish they'd packaged Frank Viola in a bid for
Canseco!) than the awards banquet circuit...
glenn
|
29.1970 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:38 | 45 |
| Good theory about the secret wishes of Sox fans. That is, quiet
consolation in being the fan of a perrenial also-ran. And, in a way,
the fact the Sox drought has added to the lore of the team.
But, unlike the Cubs, the Sox have come close. They took the Cards to 7
games in '46 and '67. They took the mighty Reds to 7 games in '75 and
the more powerful Mets to 7 in '86.
And, although I was not around in '46, I witnessed the heartbreaks of
the last 3 Series the Sox were in. I would have given anything for a
jubilant scene on the mound with Tiant or Hurst or Lonborg being
carried around on the shoulders of the fans.
My pain was shared by millions of Sox fans. We, in no way wished for
just another bridesmaid.
Ask Mac if he can watch a replay of Buckner's error or Armbrister's
failed bunt Yaz popping out to Nettles without wincing in anguish. Ask
me or /Don how we feel about it.
I think the Sox fans in this file are fairly representative of most Sox
fans. We are not takling heads from the Globe or Herald. We suffer with
this team and continue to come back for more.
Along the way we point with pride to the homers of Jimmy Foxx or the
heroics of Joe Cronin or the masterful hitting of Ted Williams or the
incredible year of Jackie Jensen or the antics of Jimmy Piersall. These
are part of the fabric of the team we love.
But the team transcends individual accomplishments. Make no mistake
about that. The glory of a championship remains as an eternal flame in
each players' belly. A flame that never dies, that represents the
heights of achievment. Unlike the medal pinned on the chest of the
soldier of a losing army just before surrender.
I just am befuddled as to what is acceptable to some people. Should Sox
fans ignore the fact that they have a great pitcher? Should we dwell on
the fact that he did not walk on water in post season play, instead?
Would the Sox have made it to post season play without him?
Should, in fact, individual awards be abolished?
Rich
|
29.1971 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:41 | 10 |
|
> I'd rather have a Red Sox WS than anything. But I wouldn't want to
> be in the City if it happens. Why the stampede alone would cause a quake....
I *will* be there for that glorious day! But until that time I'm not
going to cry and moan and bitch and wail but shut up and watch the
game! ;-)
glenn
|
29.1972 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:27 | 17 |
| Rich -
Actually, I've always felt that individual accomplishment awards have no
place in team sports. IMO, they place the individual above the team - and
that goes against everything I've every felt about being on a team.
Of all my awards I've ever received, a high school MVP award for cross-country
is the least revered. Never displayed it because I was competing on a team
sport that fielded a 7-man team, with the top 5 counting in each meet's success.
The MVP's were the 7 who were on the team. Because without them, the
individual's efforts were nothing but massaging the ego.
Awards like Cy Young and MVP seem to be more to show off the collective
'wisdom' (or in some cases spite) of the baseball writers in this country.
JD
|
29.1973 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:31 | 9 |
| I never have believed in individual awards, either, both for the main
reason JD espouses as well as for the fact that they're too subjective
with no standards applied consistently.
Also in football, the quality of an individual's performance is
affected by a lot of other factors - namely, the quality of the team
the individual has around him.
John
|
29.1974 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:51 | 29 |
| > I never have believed in individual awards, either, both for the main
> reason JD espouses as well as for the fact that they're too subjective
> with no standards applied consistently.
>
> Also in football, the quality of an individual's performance is
> affected by a lot of other factors - namely, the quality of the team
> the individual has around him.
I tend to agree with John in one sense, but disagree in another.
There are some individual awards that I like to see, like the 10th Man
in baseball, or the 6th man in hoops. Someone who is not a starter
yet who fills the 10th man role well.
I also like the sportsmanship type awards. All too often we forget that
the essence of sport is not winning. Grantland Rice summed it up
very well:
Nor victory, nor yet defeat,
Is chalked against the player's name,
But down the roll, the final scroll,
show only how he played the game.
But MVP and stuff can be so subjective....
'Saw
|
29.1975 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 03 1992 18:02 | 12 |
| 'Saw, while I like the concept of the "10th player" or "the 6th man",
very often (at least around here, for the Red Sox, Bruins and Celtics)
it becomes more of a popularity contest than anything else. These are
put to fan votes.
One of my objections to the Hall of Fame is that sportswriters vote for
it and unfortunately, their view of an athlete is very often tainted by
how that athlete was to deal with when he was active. For example,
I'll bet it costs Jim Rice some votes as he was a notoriously difficult
interview.
John
|
29.1976 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Thu Sep 03 1992 18:59 | 26 |
| > One of my objections to the Hall of Fame is that sportswriters vote for
> it and unfortunately, their view of an athlete is very often tainted by
> how that athlete was to deal with when he was active. For example,
> I'll bet it costs Jim Rice some votes as he was a notoriously difficult
> interview.
Yes, John, you're probably right. I don't see any truly objective way
for some of these things.
One of the things I like is when a bunch of players will pick other players.
I might be wrong, and I know that Mac will correct me, but I believe the
All World Cup XV at the last Rugby World Cup was chosen by peers. That
made American Kevin Swords selection as Captain of the All World Cup XV
even more special....
There will always be bias, but for the most part I'd go with a large
group of sportswriters (numbers should average out bias) or a group
of peers.
Fans are unconscinable dumb, as has been proven often....
'Saw
|
29.1977 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Sep 04 1992 08:09 | 19 |
| I like the Sigh Yung award, myself. I don't see anything wrong with
presenting such an award to a pitcher who has displayed his craft to
where he is considered the best for that particular period of time.
I also like the MVP, whereby a player is recognized for his
contribution to his team.
What I don't like is the selection process. No, I don't have a better
one in mind, but that doesn't take away the fact that I believe the
award itself is a good thing.
No, it doesn't take the place of a WS ring, or even a league
championship. But, for me, I do take some pleasure in Cecil Fielder's
run at the RBI title. As a Tiger fan, what else do I have to look
forward to? So what if we finish above Cleveland, Boston and the
Yamkees? We're still mired way down in the division, so I'll take my
pleasure where I find it.
Lee
|
29.1978 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Sep 04 1992 09:02 | 13 |
| Hey JD, "cabal" is is MrT's word and out of respect for ::SPORTS
greatest BS'er I think you shouldn't use it again.
�The WORST season for me as a Giants fan was the 9-5 season where they
�lost to the Ram 31-3 in the last game and miss the playoffs. It was easier
�for me to deal with 3-11 or 5-9, than in having them come so close....
Hey 'Saw, Eddie Anvilhaid was in his glory that night hosting the
old Sports Huddle show. He kept replaying the Giants "highlights" of the
game by saying "...the kick is up, and it's GOOD!" over and over and over...
/Don
|
29.1979 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Fri Sep 04 1992 09:27 | 23 |
| |�The WORST season for me as a Giants fan was the 9-5 season where they
|�lost to the Ram 31-3 in the last game and miss the playoffs. It was easier
|�for me to deal with 3-11 or 5-9, than in having them come so close....
|
| Hey 'Saw, Eddie Anvilhaid was in his glory that night hosting the
|old Sports Huddle show. He kept replaying the Giants "highlights" of the
|game by saying "...the kick is up, and it's GOOD!" over and over and over...
I'll never forget that day. It was the early game, and I was home
alone watching. I was so excited that for the first time that I could
remember the Giants would be going to the playoffs. Surely they
couldn't lose to the RAMS.
Well, a couple of hours later I dejectedly put on my sweatshirt,
got my football and went outside and played with some of th neighborhood
kids.
It was the second MAJOR letdown I can remember in my sports fan career,
the first coming in October, 1967......
'Saw
|
29.1980 | HAHAHA Bobby Duhon and Tucker Frederickson | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:32 | 1 |
|
|
29.1981 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:45 | 14 |
| > -< HAHAHA Bobby Duhon and Tucker Frederickson >-
Hey!
Bobby Duhon is daid I think. And Tucker runs a chain of Health Spas....
Don't be blastin' them old Giants, unless you wanna blast Leon Not-So Bright.
'Saw
|
29.1982 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:13 | 7 |
| Hey 'Saw!
I was a Jints fan in me childhood, ya know, the Tittles, Giffords,
Morrisons, Shofners, etc. When Ma voice started crackin' I followed
the Patsies 'cuz by that time, the Jints had brought in Fran da Weasel.
MikeL
|
29.1983 | 1970 Giants | SALES::THILL | | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:16 | 13 |
| I remember the 31-3 game well. The previous week the Jints beat the
Skins on a late long TD pass from Tarkenton. Mary Glickman, the Giants
radio guy damn near fell outa the booth!
The Rams were pretty good that year, I think they won their Division.
(Caint remember if the 49ers won that year or the nexted). Roman Gabriel
was their QB, and that was when the Rams had the white horn on their
helmet instead of the gold one now. It wasn't as if they got whupped by a
chump team, but it still hurt pretty bad...
Always liked Spider Lockhert and Homer Jones...
Tom
|
29.1984 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:32 | 13 |
| > The Rams were pretty good that year, I think they won their Division.
> (Caint remember if the 49ers won that year or the nexted). Roman Gabriel
> was their QB, and that was when the Rams had the white horn on their
> helmet instead of the gold one now. It wasn't as if they got whupped by a
> chump team, but it still hurt pretty bad...
Yeah, back then their colors were white/blue.
They were pretty good, but I thought the Giants could beat them....8^(
;^)
'Saw
|
29.1985 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:42 | 3 |
| You can't mention the 1970 'Jints without mentioning Ron Johnson.
/Don
|
29.1986 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Fri Sep 04 1992 12:42 | 31 |
| re Giants.
The Giants were the first team I rooted for. I'm afraid I go back a
little further. Yes, Gifford was there but the trademark of the team I
followed was the defense. The line of Dick Moduleski, Jim Katkavage and
Andy Robistelli with Rosevelt Brown and Jimmy Patton and Sam Huff. Of
course, #42 Charley Connerly was throwing to Kyle Rote and handing off
to Mell Triplett and Alex Webster. And the Giff was a youngster then.
re Awards.
I tend to agree with John and JD - awards like the Cy Young and MVP are
simply too subjective and there is NO way to change this. For instance,
is Eckersly more valuable for saving over 40 games? But, how many of
those saves were amassed by coming into a game with the A's up by 3 in
the 9th? There is no way to minimize the Eck's accomplishments but at
the sake of ignoring McDowell, Brown or Clemens? Or even Morris, for
that matter.
I think an award should be given for the best reliever which would be
based on an algorithm which is made up of saves, ERA, # of inherited
runners who scored and, perhaps, opponents BA.
In addition, perhaps an award for starting pitcher based on wins, ERA,
opponents BA, strikeouts to walks ratio and such.
It seems a shame for some guys like Eck and Clemens to possibly not get
a major award after dominating a particular phase of pitching all year.
Rich
|
29.1987 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:11 | 5 |
| Yeah, saying that Clemens winning the Cy Young is a "travesty"
is a bit severe. It's not like it would be a real travesty, like
if say Phil Simms were elected to the Football Hall Of Fame.
/Don
|
29.1988 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:18 | 12 |
| The formula used for the Rolaids Relief Award (or wahtever it's called
these days) is pretty good. Once they started including losses and
blown saves in the formula it becam pretty accurate.
There is something to be said for an award like Cy Young or MVP that is
not based on a formula. It allows for someone to win not solely on
statistical accomplishment. Sure I still think that the sportswriters
robbed (more like grand larceny) Strawberry of the MVP award in 1988,
but it is tough to argue that Gibson had absolutely no claim on it.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1989 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:37 | 11 |
|
> Sure I still think that the sportswriters
> robbed (more like grand larceny) Strawberry of the MVP award in 1988,
> but it is tough to argue that Gibson had absolutely no claim on it.
It's even tougher to dispute that Orel Hershiser wasn't the most
valuable, best, most dominating, or whatever-other-platitude-you-want-
to-use baseball player on the planet that year...
glenn
|
29.1990 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Sep 04 1992 15:25 | 7 |
| Not sure I agree about Hershiser. He had a phenomnal last
AUgust/September but his April-July was good but not unconscious.
Hershiser was certainly not in the top 3 of the voting that year, since
first 3 were Gibson, Strawberry, McReynolds.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1991 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Sep 04 1992 16:06 | 7 |
| All Orel did was something that another great pitcher that plays in Boston
has yet to do - strap a contending team on his back and carry them to
a champeenship with super, fantastic, basically flawless pitching performances
in the pressure cooker of a pennant race, champeenship series and the World
Series. that other guy does it when the team is in last place `/~
JD
|
29.1992 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Fri Sep 04 1992 16:11 | 7 |
| >All Orel did was something that another great pitcher that plays in Boston
>has yet to do - strap a contending team on his back and carry them to
>a champeenship with super, fantastic, basically flawless pitching performances
>in the pressure cooker of a pennant race, champeenship series and the World
>Series. that other guy does it when the team is in last place `/~
Gee, I didn't know that Orel could score runs from the pitcher's mound....8^)
|
29.1993 | Like you've told me, Roger had no chance 'gainst the awesome Mets | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 16:24 | 12 |
|
Knock it off, JD. Roger "strapped it on" in 1986 and you darn well
know it (no Roger, no division, no pennant, no... er, heartbreak).
It's just that he and the Red Sox "ran into a better team" in the
Series [the previous opinion is generously offered to New York Mets
fans who love to complain that Red Sox fans don't give the 1986 Mets
the credit they so richly deserve].
;-) ;-)
glenn
|
29.1994 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Fri Sep 04 1992 16:52 | 30 |
| Sorry, JD, but I think you continue to bark up the wrong tree on this
analagy.
Agreed, Hershiser did carry that woeful bunch of Dodgers to a
championship. Without him, they would not have won.
However, in '86, I doubt a pitching staff of Hurst, Boyd and (???)
would have even made it to the post season. Hurst, if I recall, had a
decnr year in '86. Yet, I would not call him the go-to guy in every
critical series the Sox were in.
I think Roger led the league in innings pitched in '86 as well as in
shutouts. I may be wrong on this but I think it is valid. I recall the
last week in the season, Clemens being hit somewhere on his body by a
line drive that caused much concern. It was felt the Sox didn't have a
snowballs' chance of anything without Clemens. Point is, Clemens was
the pitching heart and sole of that team.
I do also want to go back to other pitchers that have been discussed
before. Pitchers like Herb Score, Bob Feller, Steve Carlton, Robin
Roberts, Warren Spahn, Juan Marichal, Billy Pierce, Jim Bunning...
All pretty good pitchers. Some in the HoF. And none of them are known
for post season heroics.
Could it be that these guys pitched so hard to get their team in
contention that they were blown out come October?
Rich
|
29.1995 | More on Lefty | SHALOT::HUNT | No, Daddy, I glued them on the fish! | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:01 | 26 |
| � I do also want to go back to other pitchers that have been discussed
� before. Pitchers like Herb Score, Bob Feller, Steve Carlton, Robin
� Roberts, Warren Spahn, Juan Marichal, Billy Pierce, Jim Bunning...
�
� All pretty good pitchers. Some in the HoF. And none of them are known
� for post season heroics.
Carlton's got a ring. 1980 Phillies over the Royals. Lefty won two of
the Phils Series victories that year including the final glorious Game 6
when he was simply overpowering. See "Wilson, Willie - 1980" for more
detail.
And actually he was a pretty decent post-season player. He won some NLCS
games against the Dodgers and even homered in one of them. But his
teammates were not up to his standards as often as Phils Phans would have
liked.
But he was oh-so-dominant during the regular seasons. I saw him at least
3 or 4 times during his incredible 1972 season. Simply awesome. And I
saw many other highlights in the years to come including a 1-hitter he
threw against the Cards. Ted Simmons scratched him for a 2nd inning
single and that was it. A great great pitcher. Too bad rotis wasn't all
the rage when he was in his prime ... He'd have been one helluva expensive
pickup.
Bob Hunt
|
29.1996 | Roger Clemens is the best bar none | ESKIMO::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:16 | 10 |
| Re. JD
Orel did not win 4 games in the series which it takes to win right,
last time I checked it was 4 of 7......He knocked in zero runs in
the series so the best he did was tie every game at best 0-0.
To win the big one it takse a TEAM effort.....if you don't realize
that then you need to read up on sports...this isn't track and field
where you can win alone its a team sport...
Tom
|
29.1997 | Circumstances have always separated many of the greats... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:21 | 29 |
|
Yeah, Bob, but you've also got to admit that Lefty had some dud
seasons, too. In my mind the only reason he was not considered to be
quite as great a pitcher in his time as Tom Seaver was his consistency.
Remember the big run-in he had with that clown Bill Conlan (now semi-
famous for his appearances on the ESPN Sportwriters program) that
precipitated his clamming up for the rest of his career? The whole
thing started because Conlan wrote that Carlton came into the 1973
season off his historic 1972 cocky, fat and out of shape. And indeed,
Carlton proceeded to double his ERA and lose 20 games with a winning
percentage below that of the rest of his team (in stark contrast to the
previous season, the rest of the team improved greatly but Carlton
regressed).
The point? Not that Carlton isn't a HOF pitcher, there's no question
about that, but rather than the mind tends to color the past in a
positive way, glossing over the failures and celebrating the successes.
I think that's what many of the modern players are up against when
compared with their predecessors. For a guy like Clemens I'm rooting
hard that he gets his ring (hey, he's got nothing to prove to me),
because he's given it 100% every year since he's been in the league,
without a *single season* where he hasn't been stellar, much less only
average or slightly better. There's no question in my mind that if you
can make such a judgment (we all know too well that life doesn't
promise to be fair), Clemens has earned and deserves an even shot
at that ring...
glenn
|
29.1998 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:32 | 9 |
| re: Hershiser
Not clear the Dodgers get to the NLCS if Gibson is not on the team,
ditto Mets with Strawberry. In the NLCS Hershiser pitched a brilliant
game 7, and got out McReynolds in game 4. But he started both games 1
and 3 and the mets won those 2 games.
The Crazy Met
|
29.1999 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Tue Sep 08 1992 09:28 | 9 |
|
Roger wins! Roger wins! Seven in a row! Eight innings shutout, 3-hit
ball. 9 K's. His 18th win. ERA lowered to 2.18. 192 K's for the
year. It's a 2-horse race between Roger and Eck for the Cy, now.
Naturally, Roger should win when you compare the stats of a starter
against a mere reliever.
Dickstah
|
29.2000 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Tue Sep 08 1992 09:30 | 5 |
|
Oh, by the way, Roger defeated some old guy for the Rangers.
Dickstah
|
29.2001 | Good dule for 7 innings. | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Tue Sep 08 1992 09:30 | 5 |
|
Dickstah, I don't think that's 7 in a row.. didn't he get smacked
around a couple of outtings ago?
/Jeff
|
29.2002 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Sep 08 1992 09:34 | 2 |
| I think he meant 7 strikeouts in a row.
Denny
|
29.2003 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Tue Sep 08 1992 10:42 | 7 |
|
Actually, I thought the guy on the radio meant 7 wins, but I guess it
must've been the K's he was talking about. What do I know, I was
struck dumb and blinded by the magnificence of His Majesty's pitching.
Dickstah
|
29.2004 | Da bum... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 08 1992 12:25 | 11 |
|
> Actually, I thought the guy on the radio meant 7 wins, but I guess it
> must've been the K's he was talking about. What do I know, I was
> struck dumb and blinded by the magnificence of His Majesty's pitching.
He has won 8 of his last 9, with Mike Leary and I having the privilege
of seeing the loss... ;-)
glenn
|
29.2005 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 13:57 | 45 |
| �Well the one thing you guys are proving is my theory that Sox fans don't care
�about the team as long as one of the players brings home some sort of
�trophy.
Hardly. I think early Alchemists jumped to much more reasonable
conclusions out of the facts that they chose to look at.
�If Roger Clemens was 0-20, the Sox would be in last place. Guess what. They are
�still in last place. Big f'ing deal.
Actually, they're in 4th in the AL East. If you look at the whole AL
(with the likes of Seattle and California), they'd be even further from
last place.
�I recall one year (was it 86?) that old Roger had unreal run support. I don't
�remember any of you dudes whining about it then.
He was winning then and he's winning now. Last night he upped his
record to 18-8. The Sox are now 21-8 in games he's pitched in. The
only other pitcher on the Sox staff with a winning record is Danny
Darwin (as of a couple of weeks ago anyway) at 6-4.
�As I've said before. Roger has never strapped a team on his back to a
�champeenship - things Frank Voila, Orel, and Morris have all done. Heck
�Bruce Hurst almost did it as a Sox.
Ah yes, another mythical ability: carry a team on his back. Clemen's
musta done that since he won an MVP. Did Frank, Orel, or Jack hit alot
of HR's, get alot of RBI's or even pitch every other day? Hurst had a
phenomenal post-season in '86. He also sat out a big chunk of the
regular season with a groin injury while Roger was pitching them into
the postseason (and winning a Cy Young and an MVP).
�Ah yes "We finished last. Who cares, Rocket won the Cy - wicked pisser awesome!"
It's more like, "Looks like a miserable season. At least we can watch
someone excel".
�BTW, to Rich Brake. If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned - he
�wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young. And you can take that to the
�bank.
Even you can't really believe that JD. Otherwise you'd have to believe
that if Dwight Gooden pitched anywhere but NY he wouldn't have won his
either.
|
29.2006 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 14:58 | 18 |
| �History has borne me out. I was correct.
At least Ali was able to back up his claims of being the greatest.
Where's your proof, JD?
�Many of the same folks that I remember criticizing Andre Dawson's
�selection as MVP (they would have finished out of it without him..) - the
�same arguement is pooh-poohed by this almight and righteous cabal.
Huh? Did I miss the Roger for MVP discussion?
�And I'll repeat - this horrible season will be justified, and to some, be
�considered a success, if Roger hauls in another trophy.
Haven't you learned that just because you say something over and over
again that it doesn't make it true (except perhaps in your own mind)?
|
29.2007 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 15:03 | 10 |
| �First, the fundamental flaw in Rich Brake's, and others, anti-JD comments are
�that I have not said that Roger is an inferior pitcher, or a bad pitcher.
But noone there accused you of saying that, JD. Please try to keep up.
�(as were many Giants fans - who had done things like burn season
�tickets, hire planes to circle the stadium...).
And kept filling the stadium week after week. Doesn't somoene have to
die before a season ticket becomes available?
|
29.2008 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 15:07 | 13 |
| �It's basically inferences. I dont' have the energy, nor the time, to go
�through a few thousand notes in here, the Sox file, the Baseball file, or
�through conversations with Sox fans while running 20 milers, at games, in
�cars, on the phone, in airports, or hearing stuff on the radio.
Or to put it in simpler terms, "I'm making this stuff up as I go
along".
�But I'll use the standard arguement that I know I've seen Mac and others
�use when saying 'so and so doesn't deserve the MVP'?
Not this Mac. I, like John Hendry, rarely get overly excited about
these awards.
|
29.2009 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 08 1992 15:17 | 6 |
| � I think an award should be given for the best reliever which would be
� based on an algorithm which is made up of saves, ERA, # of inherited
� runners who scored and, perhaps, opponents BA.
There already is one, the Rolaids Relief award (it used to be the
Fireman of the Year award I believe).
|
29.2010 | Mac - Read for once - and comprehend, if possible | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Sep 11 1992 14:11 | 7 |
| Mac -
Wake up on the wrong side of the bed again?
One too many head-ons in practice?
JD
|
29.2011 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 11 1992 14:40 | 3 |
| JD,
Apparently I wasn't the only one to interpret your comments as I did.
|
29.2012 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Fri Sep 11 1992 16:15 | 10 |
| I read and interpreted them the same as you did, Mac!!
And to spare you the time it'd take to reply, JD......
"I don't give a ^%#&* what you think, Nelly!!"
Nelly
|
29.2013 | Bye-bye Cy | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Sun Sep 13 1992 08:40 | 12 |
|
Roger loses! Roger loses! Stock market plummets! Astronomers report
a misallignment of planets! Record cold grips the nether world!
Neitche says, "Clemens is dead."
Me, I was going to jump off the Tobin Bridge, but the line was too
long. Oh, the humanity! Instead I'm going up to the Prudential
Building with a high-powered rifle. Actually, all I have is a 12-guage
and some birdshot, but it might make me feel better anyway.
Dickstah
|
29.2014 | Go for it, Dickstah! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 14 1992 10:29 | 9 |
|
> Me, I was going to jump off the Tobin Bridge, but the line was too
> long. Oh, the humanity! Instead I'm going up to the Prudential
> Building with a high-powered rifle.
I think you can reach the ballpark from there...
glenn
|
29.2015 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:02 | 15 |
| | > Building with a high-powered rifle.
|
| I think you can reach the ballpark from there...
Reminds me of something a standup comic said the other night:
I was really enjoying the New Kids on the Block concert.
I was really enjoying watching them, until security took
away my high powered rifle....
'Saw
|
29.2016 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I think ya hear me knockin' | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:15 | 3 |
| What did you guys expect... they were playing da Tigers...
-Walt (who was there even if the rest of Tigermania wasn't)
|
29.2017 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Sep 15 1992 19:20 | 7 |
| re: Cy Young
Don't rule out Guzman, 14-3 and doing well since coming back. Few more
starts and he could be in the 18-3 range.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2018 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | When did MassPike go '65'??? | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:03 | 10 |
| Roger Clemens in today's Globe:
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH"
Schnort Schit Schleps
JaKe
|
29.2019 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:33 | 3 |
| Ah yes, Roger and Wade, two guys with egos bigger than Iris Chacon's butt.
JD
|
29.2020 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:35 | 14 |
| >Ah yes, Roger and Wade, two guys with egos bigger than Iris Chacon's butt.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
FINALLY. Finally, finally, finally!!!!!
SPORTS is beginning to remind of SPORTS again.
Thanks JD. Man, you made my day!
'Saw
PS Do monkies ever fly out of Iris Chacon's butt?
|
29.2021 | here's the poop.... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:38 | 19 |
| For those not in the know, the story is that on Saturday, Wade was
officially charged with an error. After the game, he spent 1/2 hour
with the official scorekeeper, beraiting him and insisting that it
wasn't REALLY an error and it should have been classified a hit.
I suppose he wore the guy down enough to change the card. This
resulted in Roger being held responsible for 2 runs. This raised
his ERA a couple of points and that now makes his Cy Young highly
improbable.
Roger's supposedly claiming Wade's not a team player!
hth
I remain,
a_fill_in_the_blanks_kinda_guy!
Kev
|
29.2022 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:43 | 3 |
| Makes me glad I don't have the baseball official scoring job ....
John
|
29.2023 | "what kinda Girls do you think we are?" | CNTROL::CHILDS | Que es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie? | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:48 | 10 |
|
Loved it when I opened up the paper this morning to those headlines hahahahaa
I love the shot Rogie threw at Wade about sitting on his duff winning the
batting crown while he, his Highness was out there mowing down Molitor and
Mattingly for Wade's sake...
and then I listen to "the Mothers - Fillmore East 1971 on my way in.....
it's a great day so far
|
29.2024 | Is it hockey season yet? | SHARE::DERRY | Bush: vegetable or noxious weed? | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:02 | 6 |
| Chuck was talking to Bob Lobel (ack) thised morning, asking him about which
side he's on... and they got around to the exorcism, held on the 24th for those
interested, and perhaps offering a human sacrifice and Lobel says, "I think we
should sacrifice the guy who has never sacrificed anything."
Guess we know which side Bob's kissin'.
|
29.2025 | I don't think Wade's going to win this one... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:21 | 29 |
|
This is great stuff! How else can the Red Sox continue to be at the
very top of the sports page when there's no on-field action worth
reporting? The more negative publicity, the worse the finish, the
greater the impetus for change. There can be no denial on Yawkey Way
in the winter of 1992-93...
Clemens would have been well-advised to keep his mouth shut. Danny
Darwin was handling Boggs' selfishness quite nicely for the team
without him. In any case, either side of the argument is only about
statistical measurement (it's the same play, and a poor start by
Clemens and a poor play by Boggs, no matter what the official scorer
says), and not about actual performance. Clemens' performance doesn't
need any amplification.
I was also at the game and initially scored the play a hit in my
scorecard when I saw it (after muttering something unprintable about
Boggs' fading reflexes). Not because Boggs couldn't have made the
play, but because it wasn't hit right at him and he didn't react. You
can argue the merits of such a system, but those kinds of plays are
ruled hits 95% of the time in practice. I suspect that the scorer was
consciously or subconsciously protecting Clemens in the first place.
As for Boggs, he appears to be doing whatever is necessary to guarantee
him the fewest number of options and the absolute minimum dollar value
for his services next year...
glenn
|
29.2026 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Que es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie? | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:30 | 2 |
|
I'm confused KBD, what sacrfices has either of them made?
|
29.2027 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:36 | 4 |
| � Darwin was handling Boggs' selfishness quite nicely for the team
� without him.
How?
|
29.2028 | This is the Red Sox, after all... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 10:43 | 11 |
|
� Darwin was handling Boggs' selfishness quite nicely for the team
� without him.
Darwin was reportedly upset with both the official scorer and Boggs and
said so. That was three days ago, and I figured that was the end of
it. But no, the thing explodes long after the fire has gone dead...
glenn
|
29.2029 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:15 | 18 |
|
Wade Boggs is selfish ?!??! I don't believe it ! I refuse to believe
it ! I won't believe it ! Tell me Whoopi Goldberg is a former Miss
America, tell me that Richard Simmons works part-time as a bouncer at
a biker bar but DON'T try and tell me Wade Boggs is selfish. Not the
Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling." Not that Wade Boggs.
Not the Wade Boggs who when asked about Larry Bird's retirement immed-
iately drew comparisons to himself. No way. I'm not buying it. Say it
ain't so, Joe please say it ain't so. That's not what I want to hear,
Joe and I've got a right to know. Wade can't be selfish. It's just not in
his blood. We're talking about a guy who whenever he passes a beggar
says, "Spare change ? No, sorry I haven't got any spare change all I've
got are these here hundreds." and then he walks a way laughing because
he knows he at least tried to help. Nope, I'd sooner believe that Uncle
Ken is going to stage a comeback than believe that Wade is selfish.
|
29.2030 | | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:26 | 5 |
| re -1
no sarcasm there ;^)
Bill
|
29.2031 | Ya had to be there, I guess. | SHARE::DERRY | Bush: vegetable or noxious weed? | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:28 | 4 |
| >I'm confused KBD, what sacrfices has either of them made?
None. I guess the point Lobel was making was that Boggs would rather
try for a hit than sacrifice.
|
29.2032 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Que es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie? | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:32 | 8 |
| > None. I guess the point Lobel was making was that Boggs would rather
> try for a hit than sacrifice.
Well a sacrifice doesn't count as a time at bat so I would think Wade would
try a sacrifice seeing it wouldn't hurt his precious average. Then again it
would help the team so.......
mc
|
29.2033 | It's been a hell of a show, Wade, don't let the door hit ya... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:41 | 15 |
|
> Not the
> Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
> or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling."
Hey, that was a great line! I choked on my lunch when I read that
Wade had actually said that. You must understand that superseding the
selfishness, the man is a bizarre human being first, with a total and
complete self-absorption that does not even entertain the notion that
others might judge him and act on what he says or does. But it makes
for great copy, and the scribes in this town will sorely miss him when
he's gone...
glenn
|
29.2034 | <insert clever smiley here> | PFSVAX::JACOB | If I only had a bulldozer | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:50 | 11 |
|
> Not the
> Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
> or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling."
I think the above statements just serve to show that Mr. Boggs DOES NOT
practice the valuing differences philosophy and uses blind people as
the brunt of his jokes.
JaKe
|
29.2035 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:41 | 3 |
| Thank you for .2029!!
The Crazy Met
|
29.2036 | With a bullet...a bullet.. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Folly Yurken? | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:00 | 7 |
|
Hey Mike,
Go take a ride on the electric cooled pony harness with fuel injection...
fuel injection...
8^))))))))
|
29.2037 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:05 | 6 |
| Seeing this entire brouhaha between Boggs, Clemens and Scoggins makes
me really happy I work in pro football where the players never
complain, the coaches seldom complain and I never hear from fantasy
players since no one knows the rules anyway.
John
|
29.2038 | The scorer always comes out with the upper hand in these things... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:10 | 11 |
|
> Seeing this entire brouhaha between Boggs, Clemens and Scoggins makes
> me really happy I work in pro football where the players never
> complain, the coaches seldom complain and I never hear from fantasy
> players since no one knows the rules anyway.
I dunno, John, you'd be famous! (Scoggins already was well known as a
longtime scorer for the Red Sox.)
glenn
|
29.2039 | It's that time of year again..... | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:18 | 100 |
| NOTE: Updated since the original....
STAGE: Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike. A long, king-of-the-road,
touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
domestic that dares to get in its way. It blares its horn at trucks,
which obediently get out of the way. State troopers look the other way,
knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
strange coolness sweep their body. Those foolhearty to stare at the
riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
"EXPRESS: FENWAY PARK"
It rampages steadily, always heading east. And folks in towns it
hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
The crescendo gets louder the closer to Landsdowne street it gets. At
the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver. He looks
vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
pocket. A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
be seen through the windows.
Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing. The star is still warming
up - exercising her sizable lungs. Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant. "Love Beantown,"
Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!"
"LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
apocalyptic horseman. Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
"Throw the Ball! Throw the Ball! He can't score from FIRST!!!"
Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!" Their sons and
daughters cry "Jim Willoughby!" and their children spit up and wet
their beds, chanting 'One Strike AWAY! One strike!'
A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
Beantown. In the corporate offices, the owners feel the presence
of the husband and wife team that guided the team for so long -
their mournful cries send shivers down their necks - he glances at
the calendar - SEPTEMBER - and he realizes the Lady isn't even
waiting til October this time....
In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed. A dark cloud
obscures the stars. No animals move, rats and pigeons stay holed up until
the inevitable passes. The faithful file in, feeling strangely
germanic and lethargic. In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
collective grimace.
The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
take. The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn. The
road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.
Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918"
A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing, "Hey guys - those
spirits are going to try to stop us again - Won't those poor souls
EVER learn!!!" A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the
name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue - "Frazee"
The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor. The doors open. The
entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
through the legs of Bill. The star slowly steps down, with
a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
huge booming of drums cuts it off. The lights in the stadium dim. A
spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
the
FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
And to the tune of the "Hallelujah Chorus", she belts out this year's
rendition ....
"OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
From Bar Harbour to Winter Haven, Provincetown to Great Barrington,
the faded hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter.
When the Fat Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the
hearts of the faithful. The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers
of despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top. The only
solace one can take is to peer up at the seats stuck just above -
the one with those two guys from Chicago....
JD
|
29.2040 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:21 | 9 |
| So far as I'm aware, there is no documented PROOF that Wade Boggs EVER
had the conversation with the beggar that Tom Brydie alluded to!!!!!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
29.2041 | And we air our dirty laundry | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:42 | 7 |
| Gotsta admit JD, younze consistent.
As the refrain goes, " Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're
down."
MikeL
|
29.2042 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:45 | 7 |
| Glenn, while I appreciate your feeling I'd be famous, to tell you the
truth I wouldn't really want it. I actually prefer my relatively low
profile. All of you in notes, my family, my work group and a lot of my
friends know about my job but I certainly would never want to be better
known than that.
John
|
29.2043 | Good one | SHALOT::HUNT | No, Daddy, I glued them on the fish! | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:47 | 5 |
| Funny stuff, JD. Got a rendition for the Phillies ???
Bob Hunt
P.S. And it looks like Handley's Jints might need one soon, too. ;-)
|
29.2044 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:49 | 8 |
| JD,
Ya main enuff to cross post that littel gem in the ::Sox conference?
btw - once again t'was an excellent note!
Kev
|
29.2045 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:26 | 5 |
| � Ya main enuff to cross post that littel gem in the ::Sox conference?
If he does, he should make a side trip to the crow cafe for his
preseason prediction of how the Sox had no excuses for not winning the
pennant this year.
|
29.2046 | "I hear that train a comin'..." | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:30 | 8 |
| re:.2039
JD
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? That is hilarious!
Bill
|
29.2047 | He did it in ::Sox! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:31 | 9 |
| JD,
'pologize for my littel remark. I've just seen where you posted that
little gem in ::Sox at 1:30PM, about 12 minutes before I replied here.
Yer a mainly kinda main!
Kev
|
29.2048 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 15:41 | 8 |
|
I don't think there'd be any kind of strenuous objection to that piece
in the Sox file. It's good stuff, and in one way or another it does
represent the frustration that all Sox fans feel, however they respond
to it. All those terrible things did happen!
glenn
|
29.2049 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:39 | 8 |
|
Interesting game lasted night in a quirky way. Sox-Brewers going 15
innings. Sox, 11 hits, Brews, 10 hits. All singles. What a slugfest,
eh? Sox win 2-1, each team scoring a run on a safety squeeze,
including the game winner.
Dickstah
|
29.2050 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:45 | 9 |
| Apparently Copernicus was wrong the planets actually orbit around
Wade...
" I don't see where I did anything wrong."
_Wade Boggs on the now famous "Was it a hit or an error"
controversy.
|
29.2051 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | If I only had a bulldozer | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:51 | 8 |
|
>>eh? Sox win 2-1, each team scoring a run on a safety squeeze,
What's a safety squeeze, is that when you don't know whether it's gas
or substance, and you proceed with extreme caution??
JaKe
|
29.2052 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:57 | 14 |
| > What's a safety squeeze, is that when you don't know whether it's gas
Bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the first base side.
The Suicide Squeeze is bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the third
base side.
I guess that rationale is that on the safety, the ball is going away
from the incoming runner....
'Saw
|
29.2053 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:09 | 7 |
|
� Interesting game lasted night in a quirky way. Sox-Brewers going 15
^^^^^^
I thought he was still with Oakland...
You mean people are still watching these games? Unbeleivable - 30K+ at Fenway
every game, plus NESN and free TV.
|
29.2054 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:14 | 10 |
| re the play that stirred the Boggs/Clemens "controversy":
I finally saw it on ESPN last night. Didn't appear that Boggs even
touched the ball, so I'd have scored it a hit.
That being said, a Ventura or Caminiti or any 3B with range makes that
play easily...
py
|
29.2055 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:18 | 10 |
| I thought a safety squeeze is one in which the runner on third waits to
make sure the ball is bunted and bunted well. The suicide squeeze is
the one where the guy on third is coming down the line no matter what.
Hobson stepped into the Boggs/Clemens controversy and said that it's
much ado about nuthin'. Both were raised by good parents to be
gentlemen.
According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
|
29.2056 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:26 | 8 |
|
>You mean people are still watching these games?
Well, a baseball game is still better than watching "America's Funniest
Most Wanted Top Cop Eyewitness Rescue Videos."
Dickstah
|
29.2057 | Suicide vs Safety | SHALOT::HUNT | No, Daddy, I glued them on the fish! | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:29 | 36 |
| � Bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the first base side.
�
� The Suicide Squeeze is bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the third
� base side.
Sorry, 'Saw, you gotta go back to the end of the line and start over,
dude. Neither the safety squeeze nor the suicide sueeze require a bases
loaded situation. All they require is a man on third *usually* with just
one out.
The difference between the two plays is simply a matter of when the runner
on third chooses to break for home plate. In a suicide squeeze, the
runner breaks for home as soon as he sees the pitcher commit to a pitch.
Thus, it becomes absolutely imperative for the bunter to make contact and
get the bunt down on the ground. Otherwise, the runner is out.
In a "safety" squeeze, the runner does *not* break with the pitch.
Rather, he waits until he sees the bunter drop down a good bunt. Then,
he goes if he thinks he can outrace the fielders' efforts to pick up the
bunt and make a play on him at the plate. With this play, there's little
risk of losing the runner at third on a short bunt, a missed bunt or a
popped-up bunt like there is with the suicide squeeze. The runner only
goes on a "safe" bunt.
The "book" usually calls for either of these plays with a man on third and
just one out. You definitely do *not* want to put one of these two plays
on with the bases loaded since the force would be on at the plate and
that's too easy to defend. Why one out ??? I guess it's because with
no outs you're still looking for the so-called big inning and with two
outs, of course, it's pointless since the bunt can be fielded and tossed
to first with no harm done.
So, when you see one out and a man on third in a close situation, sit up
and take notice. You might see some fun.
Bob Hunt
|
29.2058 | I'm watchin' da tomahawk choppers | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:30 | 5 |
| � Well, a baseball game is still better than watching "America's Funniest
� Most Wanted Top Cop Eyewitness Rescue Videos."
I agree, and tha's why I'm glad my cable company carries TBS.
|
29.2059 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:41 | 2 |
| The Home Shopping Club is better than a baseball game!
Denny
|
29.2060 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | If I only had a bulldozer | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:46 | 6 |
| BobHunt
.2057 is one of the reasons I'll miss ya in here.
JaKe
|
29.2061 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:47 | 3 |
|
Yer unAmerican, Denny.
|
29.2062 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:48 | 11 |
| re Bob and Mac....
Yeah, sorry guys, excuse my ignorance. I really messed that one up.
That's what I get for doing two things at once. As soon as you both
talked about the REAL definition, a big bell went off in my head
that said "Idiot!"
'Saw
|
29.2063 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:52 | 8 |
|
"Don't ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for you."
Now, is a suicide blonde different from a safety blonde, and should
peroxide blondes be banned along with artificial surfaces?
Dickstah
|
29.2064 | and they say this kind of stuff only happens in the NL... | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:57 | 11 |
| � The "book" usually calls for either of these plays with a man on third and
� just one out. You definitely do *not* want to put one of these two plays
� on with the bases loaded since the force would be on at the plate and
� that's too easy to defend. Why one out ??? I guess it's because with
� no outs you're still looking for the so-called big inning and with two
� outs, of course, it's pointless since the bunt can be fielded and tossed
� to first with no harm done.
The Brewers went against the "book" to score their first run when the
put the squeeze on with 2 outs. The bunt was a good one, and the
bunter was able to beat the throw to first base.
|
29.2065 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bush Ad -*, H. I. *****, Seinfeld ****** | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:08 | 4 |
|
wathc it Saw or you'll be sliding into a hole with the TBBB aka TRBC...
;^)
|
29.2066 | | MSBOS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:16 | 6 |
|
>> According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
>> scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
Boggs summoned Scoggins and proceeded to give him a list of reasons
why it should be scored a hit.
|
29.2067 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:18 | 13 |
| >wathc it Saw or you'll be sliding into a hole with the TBBB aka TRBC...
8^0
Well, fortunately for me, my belly is definitely getting smaller.....
And when I wear my shirts I don't get that crater you can see through
the shirt where the belly button is.....8^)
'Saw
|
29.2068 | Great fun! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:20 | 14 |
|
>> According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
>> scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
> Boggs summoned Scoggins and proceeded to give him a list of reasons
> why it should be scored a hit.
It sounded like it was somewhere in between. Scoggins was working at
his day job as a reporter in the clubhouse and Boggs leaned over to him
and said "that was a tough error, you know". And the rest is
history...
glenn
|
29.2069 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:23 | 6 |
| If a coach or a PR director comes to me with a question about a play
I'm always willing to talk it over. If they don't accept my
explanation then I refer them to the Elias Sports Bureau. If they rant
and rave, I won't listen.
John
|
29.2070 | Just say no to tantrum-throwing athletes! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:34 | 15 |
|
You know, John, I *really, really* think you need to get yourself in
a situation where you call it by the book and someone gets denied a
1000-yard season or something. Think of the celebrity! More
importantly, think of the honor brought to the profession! ;-)
I seem to recall something like that happening to an Atlanta Falcons
running back in the early 1970s. The guy had gone over the 1000-yard
mark for the season, and they gave him the ball and all of the
congratulatory handshakes and such, and then on the next play he lost
five yards and fumbled, or something similar to that. And that was
his last carry of the season...
glenn
|
29.2071 | Boggs | POWDML::HEIER | | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:35 | 15 |
| A good point to make is why does Wade Boggs even care if he got
an error. It didn't effect the outcome of the game and they lost.
It shows that some players are much more interested in how they do
and not how the team does. Wade has used every excuse this year
to explain his poor hitting (injury, sight) to no avail. He knows
he gave up 10 million dollars over the next two years to play out
his option since he thought he was worth more. As it turns out,
he made a terrific gamble, and lost!! He will be lucky to get 2
million next year.
An over used example of a team player was Larry Bird. After he scored
40 points in a game but they lost, Bird didn't want to talk about his
own stats, just the team. And Boggs tries to compare himself to Bird.
JEEEZ.
|
29.2072 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:47 | 9 |
| My father is very fond of saying "Takes all kinds to make up a world"....
I guess he's right.
I mean, look at the difference between Ricky Henderson and Nolan Ryan.
Boggs should shut his mouth, and just be a team player......
'Saw
|
29.2073 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 17 1992 13:39 | 6 |
| Glenn, I hope if I'm ever faced with that situation, I call it right
and stand up for what I believe in. If I'm wrong I'm wrong (I've made
mistakes before and corrected them), but I hope I never change a call
because of pressure.
John
|
29.2074 | | WKRP::LEETCH | US Messaging Practice DTN 432-7628 | Thu Sep 17 1992 13:58 | 15 |
| Re: .2071
> A good point to make is why does Wade Boggs even care if he got
> an error.
I'm neither a Wade Boggs defender not detractor but the fact is is that the
amount a MLB player gets paid depends solely on his individual stats.
Arbitration, free agency, etc. all reward players with good stats. They don't
(for the most part) reward players for playing on a winning team.
Not that I agree with the above, but dem's the facts of life. Wade is looking
out for his pay stub.
Bruce
|
29.2075 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I think ya hear me knockin' | Thu Sep 17 1992 14:28 | 12 |
| I listened to RKO last night and they had the scorer on. He said he
couldn't tell from the replay, but had to make a call and ruled it an
E. Because he wasn't 100% he was willing to change it. Boggs had
someone tell the scorer he wanted to talk to him, they talked for 90
seconds and he decided to change it at Wade's request. In the back
of the scorer's mind, he knew that would change the ERA, and was
surprised Wade asked him about it, but that point was never discussed.
If Wade changed his mind again, he wouldn't have changed it back.
See, and that was the Tigermania game... gee Kev, why didn't ya buy the
tix? (hahah)
|
29.2076 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Sep 17 1992 14:28 | 10 |
| re: .2074
Morris got 5 million from the Blue Jays. A real chunk of that was
because he had that phenomenal WS, especially game 7. Sure he pitched
well last year, but the WS was what really got him additional bucks.
Similar stuff with Ripken and Sandberg, more for the past than the
future.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2077 | It's a cain't-miss | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 17 1992 14:37 | 12 |
|
> See, and that was the Tigermania game... gee Kev, why didn't ya buy the
> tix? (hahah)
Good stuff always happens at Saturday afternoon Tigermania games.
Clemens throwing 165 pitches in 95 deg heat while Tollway Joe snoozes
in the dugout, Clemens inciting a riot by plunking John Shelby, Roger
and Wade starting the Basebawl Scandal...
glenn
|
29.2078 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | W I N D - It Blows | Thu Sep 17 1992 15:34 | 4 |
| If Clemens and Boggs were real main they would settle their
differences in a steel cage!
/Don
|
29.2079 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Sep 17 1992 15:36 | 7 |
| re: .2078
Not everyone can be like you Slasher :-)
HtH
The Crazy Met
|
29.2080 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Sep 17 1992 15:49 | 2 |
| Think we cain get the two a them on that 'grudge match' show on TV?
Denny
|
29.2081 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Thu Sep 17 1992 16:34 | 19 |
| No, I liked Slasher firsted idea.
A steel cage, no holds barred, wrasslin match. Hulk Hogan could
be the celebrity ref.
I can see it now. Boggsy is getting the better of Rog, and Mo Vaughn
comes running out of the chute, grabs the bars, pulls them aside,
jump in the cage, bashes Wade with a steel chair, but behind Mo,
Greenwell has come into the cage wif a cattle prod and he jabs
Mo in the butt.
This upsets the crowd, and Kirby Puckett, who just happened to be
in the audience, rushes up and jumps on Greenwell's back....
Man, it's good enough for Wrasslemania XXIII.....
'Saw
|
29.2082 | anyone besides me admit to watching Grudge Match? | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 17 1992 16:43 | 8 |
| nah nah nah, Grudge Match is definitely the way to go..in round 1, Wade
and Roger battle it out with oversized Nerf bats, Round 2 could be a
hamburger bun fight. In Round 3 provide both combatants with a ream
of the new no-frills 25 cent Red Sox scorecards, which they can dip in
grudge glop and hurl at each other... :-)
py
|
29.2083 | Rog would shut that little weenie up in nuthin flat | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | IfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!! | Thu Sep 17 1992 17:06 | 5 |
|
No contest, Rog would squash po Wade. After all, I doubt Wade jams his fist
into buckets of sand - you got a problem wid dat??
|
29.2084 | Nexted year, Rog! | SHARE::DERRY | Bush: vegetable or noxious weed? | Fri Sep 18 1992 07:07 | 1 |
|
|
29.2085 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:40 | 9 |
|
Roger is shelled! Five errors committed to boot! What a bunch of
bums!
This weekend I'm organizing a group of other equally frustrated fans,
and we're gonna go out and bomb baseball clinics.
Dickstah
|
29.2086 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I think ya hear me knockin' | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:30 | 2 |
| Winner gets the winner of Pinella-Dibble?
|
29.2087 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | W I N D - It Blows | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:21 | 5 |
| Wonder if the Sox will raise ticket prices this year? Maybe
Dibble and Roger should square off for the "Bad Boy Of Baseball"
title.
/Don
|
29.2088 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:27 | 12 |
|
> Wonder if the Sox will raise ticket prices this year?
Believe it or not, I've heard such murmurings. Someone I know who was
trying to exchange from a rain-out was told that there might be a hike
in some of the grandstands, which didn't get one the last time around.
But considering the way things are wrapping up, and the widespread
apathy, the Red Sox may re-consider that one this winter...
glenn
|
29.2089 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | W I N D - It Blows | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:37 | 5 |
| WOW Glenn, that's some nerve. The Broons, Celts and Red Sox
have had yearly increases for a few years now. Guess my Pats tickets
are the best bargain in town.
/Don
|
29.2090 | ...relatively speaking | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | W I N D - It Blows | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:37 | 1 |
|
|
29.2091 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | W I N D- it passes and breaks | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:41 | 5 |
| Just hear that there are 5 guys outside the official scorers office
wanting to talk about lasted night's decisions.
JaKe
|
29.2092 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:30 | 4 |
| Is Mike Childs on vacation? 12:30 and no note, must be a new record :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.2093 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:34 | 14 |
| > Just hear that there are 5 guys outside the official scorers office
> wanting to talk about lasted night's decisions.
They ought to be thankful only five errors were charged, there were at
least as many non-error defensive miscues (like not covering bases and
double plays/fielder's choices that should have been converted and
weren't). And that was just in the five innings that I watched before
turning this game off in disgust. As an O's fan who was hoping to get
some more distance put between Baltimore and Milwaukee, thanks for
nothing.
py
|
29.2094 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:43 | 10 |
|
> As an O's fan who was hoping to get
> some more distance put between Baltimore and Milwaukee, thanks for
> nothing.
The Orioles will get their turn next weekend, Paul... and a shot at an
apparently burnt-out Roger Clemens, too... ;-)
glenn
|
29.2095 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:47 | 7 |
| re .2094:
Good point Glenn...hopefully after the Jays visit Camden Yards next
weekend will still mean something.
py
|
29.2096 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:53 | 8 |
| I've seen 2 sure signs that the Sox are indeed finished (other than the
standings, of course).
WTAG AM broke into the Sox telecast the other night to provide updates
on results of the primary elections.
All of the TVs at Stoney O'Brien's last night were tuned into the
Rutgers/Pitt game.
|
29.2097 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 18 1992 13:54 | 15 |
|
> WOW Glenn, that's some nerve. The Broons, Celts and Red Sox
> have had yearly increases for a few years now. Guess my Pats tickets
> are the best bargain in town.
The Red Sox haven't had yearly increases on a particular seat (I know
the Celtics have, and massive ones). I've been out in the bleachers
for five years and they've gone from $5 to $7 in two $1 increases.
Those won't go up this winter, either, or the bleachers will only get
emptier. But to raise the price on *any* seats this winter will be a
PR disaster, no question...
glenn
|
29.2098 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Click, Bang. Your daddy just shot po' me.. | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:10 | 7 |
|
When you consider that two weeks ago Roger all but had that Cy Young signed
sealed and delievered, the soxs out of the pennant, the only pressure on
Roger was to perform. He's still gaggin' on the big game folks in my best
questimation....
mike
|
29.2099 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:10 | 7 |
| What a disgusting display. 5 flippin' errors, mental miscues.
Workin' hard fer their money, I see.
This team knows how to do one thing, TANK.
MikeL
|
29.2100 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:19 | 5 |
| I heard that before the game, the Sox players patted Roger on the butt, handed
him the ball, and said "Roger, pitch like this was the 7th game of the
World Series" And he went out and did just that.
JD
|
29.2101 | Little roller up along first... | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:20 | 7 |
| re .2100:
And the position players fielded like it was the 6th game of the World
Series... :-)
py
|
29.2102 | From philosophy class ;^) | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | IfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!! | Fri Sep 18 1992 15:08 | 3 |
|
"It's hard to soar like an eagle when you're working with turkeys."
|
29.2103 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | W I N D- it passes and breaks | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:01 | 8 |
| re .2100
JD, ya wanna send me some windex and paper towels, please???
I gotta clean the diet coke offa this terminal afore I leave.
JaKe
|
29.2104 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 17:34 | 10 |
| The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
As an aside, has there been a player who would have won the triple
crown in either league. That is he had the highest BA, most HR, most
RBI's in the majors in a given year?
The Crazy Met
|
29.2105 | I'll check at home tonight | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Can you do this one? | Mon Sep 21 1992 17:38 | 10 |
| re .2104:
> The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
> triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
> these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
I think Mark Langston won the strikeout title that year.
py
|
29.2106 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 17:39 | 18 |
|
> The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
> triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
> these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
Mark Langston edged out Clemens by a few strikeouts in 1986. There
have been no pitching Triple Crown winners in the AL since Hal
Newhouser did it in 1945. Dwight Gooden is the last NLer to do it,
in 1985.
Clemens still has a shot at it this year but he'd have to win his last
three games in strong fashion and hope for some help. All of the top
starters in the AL (Clemens, McDowell, Brown, Morris, Guzman, Appier)
have run into some difficulty lately. The innings start taking their
toll...
glenn
|
29.2107 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 17:50 | 4 |
| McDowell has 20 wins, Clemens 18, right?? What do the others have?
The Crazy Met
|
29.2108 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 17:56 | 10 |
|
> McDowell has 20 wins, Clemens 18, right?? What do the others have?
Brown 19, Morris 19, Guzman 15, Appier 15 with a 2.46 ERA (and done for
the season as clubhouse ERA leader, I think). If Clemens were to win
three all it would probably take would be for McDowell to be held to
21 wins... but it ain't gonna happen.
glenn
|
29.2109 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | George Bush, mental wimp | Tue Sep 22 1992 09:59 | 10 |
|
> Brown 19, Morris 19, Guzman 15, Appier 15 with a 2.46 ERA (and done for
> the season as clubhouse ERA leader, I think). If Clemens were to win
> three all it would probably take would be for McDowell to be held to
> 21 wins... but it ain't gonna happen.
Which one Glenn? McDowell checked at 21, or His Highness winning 21?
;^)
|
29.2110 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 22 1992 10:23 | 9 |
|
> Which one Glenn? McDowell checked at 21, or His Highness winning 21?
McDowell may be slightly longer than even odds to win 22, but with
Bozo's Bigtop Circus behind him the odds on His Highness winning 21 are
off the board...
glenn
|
29.2111 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Wed Sep 23 1992 10:52 | 13 |
|
Po' Mr. Rocket. In the "Them's the Breaks Dept.", Roger got no support
again. That was his 4th complete game loss, coupled with 3 blown saves
behind him this year. Plantier didn't come within 5 feet of a 2-out
fly ball that let in one run, while Hatcher botched a not-so-routine-
but-catchable 2-out ball that bounced out of his glove like he was
wearing a dinner plate instead of a glove for another pair of runs.
Now that was a play that could have been argued with the official
scorer. His Highness ain't so high after three straight losses.
Trade the bum. ;-)
Dickstah
|
29.2112 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 23 1992 10:59 | 12 |
|
Hatcher is one of those massively overrated "underrated" players.
After watching him for almost a full season now, he's only a marginal
improvement over Mike Greenwell in the outfield. Seriously.
Clemens didn't get it done, though. His overpowering stuff has
deserted him for the rest of the season. Doesn't mean that with a
little support he couldn't have picked up a couple of more wins, but
he's cooked...
glenn
|
29.2113 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Can you do this one? | Wed Sep 23 1992 11:06 | 8 |
| Didn't see last night's game, but in Clemens' previous start vs.
Milwaukee there were a good number of hard-hit balls off him.
I suppose any horse's back will break sooner or later if he has to
carry 24 jockeys...
py
|
29.2114 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 23 1992 11:30 | 3 |
| I see Roger was in post season form again lasted night.
JD
|
29.2115 | He always get injuried when he rolls a turkey...
| CNTROL::CHILDS | George Bush, mental wimp | Wed Sep 23 1992 11:38 | 4 |
|
When are they going to announce Roger's injury????
mike
|
29.2116 | If he shut it down right now I'd have no problems with it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:03 | 14 |
|
What do you guys want? If Clemens were winning these games they'd be
"meaningless"... if he's losing them they're equated with the
postseason.
In the past few years there's been a pretty good correlation between
the Red Sox tanking it and Clemens going along with them after the
fact, and on the other side of the coin between the Red Sox contending
and Clemens rising to the occasion (shutting out Toronto twice down the
stretch in 1990, etc.). That doesn't sound like a stats and awards guy
to me. I'd rather have it this way than the other way around...
glenn
|
29.2117 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | I need a bambulance | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:13 | 4 |
|
glenn, they just want to bust your b@!!s. Ignore them.
Brews
|
29.2118 | I just had to say that!! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Folly Yurken? | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:14 | 6 |
|
Phil Plantier is a stiff.
Steve
|
29.2119 | Can't wait for October 8! | SHARE::DERRY | Only 151 days til spring training... | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:22 | 1 |
|
|
29.2120 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:32 | 9 |
|
> glenn, they just want to bust your b@!!s. Ignore them.
Yes, I know, but I'm trapped by my obligation to play the foil in this
note and to keep the record straight... ;-)
glenn
|
29.2121 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Can you do this one? | Wed Sep 23 1992 12:33 | 7 |
| In fairness, Roger is far from the only Cy Young contender who's
running out of gas as the season winds down...Tom Glavine has pitched
poorly since winning his 20th, ditto with Jack McDowell, and Kevin
Appier sustained an injury that put him out for the season.
py
|
29.2122 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed Sep 23 1992 20:56 | 6 |
| Boy am I glad I'm in Colorado Springs now. I no longer have to suffer
through the Red Sox and I'm swapping teams. Now I can't really be
called a trader because it is a different league and an expansion team.
Colorado's own Rockies (yay! Probably get a better record too)
Marc
|
29.2123 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 24 1992 00:28 | 11 |
| I didn't want to come into the 93 inagural Rockies' season
cold. Since last season I've been following events fairly
close both here and around the leagues. I thought it would
be an easy transition to the Rockies full time. What I've
found out is that I think I'll keep my allegiance to the
the Indians as much now as ever and devote time to the
new guys too. One team in the AL and one in the NL ought
to keep me going next year.
BoB
|
29.2124 | Da curse | SHARE::DERRY | Only 151 days til spring training... | Thu Sep 24 1992 10:42 | 1 |
| Father Guido Sarducci is exorcising Fenway in about 5 minutes...
|
29.2125 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Martina's half the man Jimmy C. is | Thu Sep 24 1992 10:45 | 4 |
| Is Father Porter taking part, too????
JaKe
|
29.2126 | + | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Candidate for Tossing | Thu Sep 24 1992 10:58 | 16 |
|
Lasted time I seen a exorcism, the yung lass spinned her haid all
around.
Will Fenway Pahk lift itsalf up and spin 'round and 'round sorta like
somthang y'ud see in a GhostBuster's(tm) movie?
If it does, will the popcorn kernels and empty plactic cups fall to the
ground or will they be "forced" towards the outer edges of the stadium?
wondering.......
I remain,
an angel (as of lasted night)
Kev
|
29.2127 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo,That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Sep 24 1992 12:55 | 4 |
| HA! I can see it now. Gorman's haid spinning 'round and 'round
saying "What would we do with Barry Bonds".
/Don
|
29.2128 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I think ya hear me knockin' | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:58 | 2 |
| What's the tragic number now?
|
29.2129 | Ya right... | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Folly Yurken? | Fri Sep 25 1992 09:45 | 9 |
|
Hey the Stiffs actually won a game lasted night!!!
Looks like the WBCN excorsism worked! Allrighta!!
1993 WORLD SERIES CHAMPS!!!!
Steve
|
29.2130 | | FDCV07::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Fri Sep 25 1992 11:02 | 4 |
| Enjoy baseball thised year because there won't be Major League baseball
nexred year for a while...
REK
|
29.2131 | Winners of 3 outta 4 since the big E. | SHARE::DERRY | Only 146 days til spring training... | Mon Sep 28 1992 07:15 | 1 |
|
|
29.2132 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Sep 28 1992 09:22 | 3 |
| Yep, and old Roger gets an injury. Or so he says.
JD
|
29.2133 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:24 | 1 |
| I think Rog' got a case of the "I'm-out-of-the-Cy-sweepstakes-itis".
|
29.2134 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:36 | 10 |
|
As I said earlier, Clemens should just shut it down. He admitted to
hurting himself during that great game against Texas and Nolan Ryan
(not after a loss or a bad game) and he's stunk since. The *team*
thing to do would be to not risk further injury and just to pick it up
next year, but I'm sure either way he goes the decision will be
criticized...
glenn
|
29.2135 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:41 | 14 |
| > As I said earlier, Clemens should just shut it down. He admitted to
> hurting himself during that great game against Texas and Nolan Ryan
> (not after a loss or a bad game) and he's stunk since. The *team*
> thing to do would be to not risk further injury and just to pick it up
> next year, but I'm sure either way he goes the decision will be
> criticized...
Kind of like the Patriots yesterday -- by the end of the game they
just wanted to get outta there without any injuries...
Two peas in a pod,
'Saw
|
29.2136 | But I bet Al Bumbry will be coaching first base nexted season | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Tue Sep 29 1992 11:28 | 11 |
| Ya know, as a long time Red Sox fan, I feel so much better that the team is
mending their ways when it comes to the recognized racist policies of the past.
Yup, something to be proud of.
Oh gee, what's this I read in today's paper - they have decided that they would
only renew one contract between Tom Brunansky ($2.3M) and Billy Hatcher ($2.0M),
and that they have decided upon Bruno. Oh, and the other item I read was that
the expansion list leaves Ellis Burks unprotected, while Mike Greenwell is
protected. I couldn't be a pattern, now could it? Nah, not the new Red Sox.
=Bob=
|
29.2137 | They're all bums... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 29 1992 11:39 | 17 |
|
Brunansky should not be renewed at the price, even though he had the
best season at the plate of any Red Sox. The rest of the moves make
complete sense. Billy Hatcher can't run anymore and that means he
can't play, and certainly not for $2 million. Ellis Burks is coming
off two of the most serious injuries an athlete can have-- both back
and knee problems, and likely won't be drafted while Greenwell could
be (personally, I'd dangle both if there was anybody at all with the
slightest chance of developing in the minors).
And of course, a white franchise "legend" like Wade Boggs probably
isn't going to be asked back either, and is going out in a wave of
shame to boot. The Red Sox are stocked with stiffs, black and white.
Let's see who they replace them with.
glenn
|
29.2138 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:00 | 16 |
|
Brady Anderson....Brady Anderson....now where have I heard that name
before? He didn't happen to play for the Red Sox at one time did he?
He became the first American Leaguer to have 20 or more homers, 50
stolen bases (do the Sox as a team have 50 this year?) and 75 RBI's in
one season. It's enough to bring tears to one's eyes to think of the
Brady's, the Cecil Coopers, the Pudge's, and others who went on to
shine elsewhere. I honestly can't think of anyone who the Sox have
"stolen" who went on to have a distinguished career in Boston, with
the possible exception of Luis Tiant, who they took from the scrap
heap. Sure they may have grabbed a Tom Seaver, a Bill Campbell, even
a Nick Esasky or a Tony Armas who served a short-term purpose, but...
(sigh).....Brady Anderson.....why can't we get guys like that?
Dickstah
|
29.2139 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:15 | 4 |
|
Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?
|
29.2140 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NewEnglandPatriots-ItsGonnaTakeAlot | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:21 | 4 |
| The Boston Red Sox are the biggest waste of money and hoopla
since the '92 Mets.
/Don
|
29.2141 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:34 | 3 |
| Any truth to the rumor the Socks are throwing Mighty Matt Young at
the Jays tomorrow night? Oughta make the Brewers all warm and fuzzy!
Denny
|
29.2142 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:49 | 12 |
| � Any truth to the rumor the Socks are throwing Mighty Matt Young at
� the Jays tomorrow night? Oughta make the Brewers all warm and fuzzy!
That's what Ned & Jerry said last night. Hobson was thinking about
sending Scott Taylor against the Jays, but changed his mind figuring
that the Brewers would be upset that the Sox would throw a rookie into
a game that could effect the pennant race. Personally, I think the
Brewers would be more upset at seeing Matt Young start against the
Jays.
Both Taylor and Young pitched last night. I wonder if this will have
an impact on the rotation for the Jays series.
|
29.2143 | Inquiring minds and all that | PFSVAX::JACOB | And Nirvana can fly outta my butt | Tue Sep 29 1992 13:02 | 9 |
| >>That's what Ned & Jerry said last night. Hobson was thinking about
What do the Ice Cream guys have to do with baseball????
(8^)*
JaKe
|
29.2144 | one gong to go | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Sep 29 1992 23:46 | 5 |
|
Guess who lost 5-2 to Toronto just now?
?
|
29.2145 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Where the Hell am I?? | Tue Sep 29 1992 23:50 | 11 |
| re-.1
The bigger question is
WHO CARES!!!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
29.2146 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Sep 30 1992 10:05 | 4 |
| Viola asked to pitch in tonight's game and is being allowed to do so.
He's going on 3 days rest.
Clemens will miss the remainder of the season due to a groin pull.
|
29.2147 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeBush-Let'sGetItOn!...Later | Wed Sep 30 1992 12:50 | 6 |
| Just a coincidence that Viola pitches tonight? Could be the
"Commissioner Committee" decided that the only race left could be
over one day sooner if the doorMatt pitches and let the Sox know
about it.
/Don
|
29.2148 | Typical | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:23 | 11 |
| Yabbut I want to know, not that it matters to me, but the BrewCrew
fans must be lovin' it,
What the hail was Hobson doing in the top of the seventh? Sox down,
5-2 two on two out. Gaston removes Key for Duane Ward with Jody Reed
due up. hobson lets Boy Wonder hit and he flie meekly to center.
Now Ward's a righty, Reed bats righty. WHERE WAS EITHER VAUGHN OR
PLANTIER?? I could hear the shout all the way from Milwaukee.
MikeL
|
29.2149 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:26 | 8 |
| MIke....
Clell has tucked his tail betwixt his banged up laigs and headed home
to Abalama....if only figuratively.....
hth,
'Saw
|
29.2150 | My comments from RED_SOX... Butch's brain has calcified... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:27 | 17 |
|
The Butcher did it again last night! He was sitting on his hands
in the 7th as Jody Reed was allowed to hit with two men on, and then
Wedge is again the guy who gets sat down later when he finally figures
out to use Vaughn. Now the Brewers have something to legitimately
protest. It's pretty bad when the Red Sox home announcers are
not-so-subtly banging on your every decision (or non-decision).
Is it just me, or can anyone else stop themselves from bursting out
in laughter when the cameras keep showing Butch and Zim sitting
side-by-side, stoically, silently in the dugout? Does Butch ever even
move? I'm serious; I rarely see him even talking to anyone in there,
much less his so-called "mentor"...
glenn
|
29.2151 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Magic an egomanic or NBA=WWF? | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:38 | 6 |
|
Does it really matter? I mean we are talking the Red Soxs here. Let say
Butch had made the switch and Vaughn or Wedge hit it out to tie. They
surely would have lost it later....
mike
|
29.2152 | Butch cain't think1/2 move ahead | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:56 | 6 |
| As I said it really doesn't matter to me at this point.
But this looks like just an indication of brain-dead tactics.
Hosbon has no clue. Where's Tollway Joe?
MikeL
|
29.2153 | | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Calling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.Howard | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:59 | 12 |
| �< Note 29.2152 by CTHQ::LEARY "Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong." >
-< Butch cain't think1/2 move ahead >-
� Where's Tollway Joe?
Sitting at home in Walpole, laughing all the way to the bank.
HTH,
Chap
|
29.2154 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Sep 30 1992 15:23 | 4 |
| Gee, isn't that 'commissioner committee' headed by the owner of the
...
Brewers!!?
Denny
|
29.2155 | Just lookin' after the "best interests a' baseball" there Denny | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeBush-Let'sGetItOn!...Later | Wed Sep 30 1992 16:43 | 1 |
|
|
29.2156 | | JUPITR::MIOLA | Phantom | Thu Oct 01 1992 01:34 | 8 |
|
And Viola backs up his request with a one hitter....
9'th inning single.
Lou
|
29.2157 | Many Gongs!!! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Oct 01 1992 09:11 | 2 |
| Sox Clinch last. But they backed in w/a Tiger loss!
Denny
|
29.2158 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 01 1992 09:14 | 4 |
| A nohitter would've at least salvaged a shred of dignity for
the season. Hey Selig, the Sox held up their end of the deal.
/Don
|
29.2159 | wasted artillary
| CNTROL::CHILDS | Magic an egomanic or NBA=WWF? | Thu Oct 01 1992 10:10 | 8 |
| > A nohitter would've at least salvaged a shred of dignity for
> the season. Hey Selig, the Sox held up their end of the deal.
and it would have been an accomplishment the his Highness has never achieved
with this sad sack team. I shouldn't have watched that ninth inning I probably
KOD'ed him...
mike
|
29.2160 | Score anyone? | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Folly Yurken? | Thu Oct 01 1992 10:38 | 9 |
|
So did Swillwalkee beat Seattle lasted??
Nice job by Viola, you just knew he wasn't going to get the
steenkin' no hitter tho'...........
Steve
|
29.2161 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 01 1992 11:11 | 13 |
|
> So did Swillwalkee beat Seattle lasted??
Nope. See ya...
How did I know that a jab at my main Roger would work its way into this?
Until someone else strikes out 20 batters in a game (hint: it's been done
*once* in over 150,000 major league starts), I'm not going to criticize
anyone for their failure to achieve a dastickical novelty... ;-)
glenn
|
29.2162 | 25 years ago today! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Oct 01 1992 13:16 | 3 |
| 2 Excellent articles in today's Glob about the '67 finale. One by
Bob Ryan and one by Kevin Dupont.
Denny
|
29.2163 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 01 1992 13:32 | 10 |
| Heard some fuuny remembrances about '67 this morning on WEEI.
One guy who went to the game and was on the field remembers taking
the train back to Reveyah and seeing many "souvenirs". He said
it was amusing to see sheet metal sections of the scoreboard being
dragged onto the Blue Line. This caller said one guy had sections
that said "CLEVE" and "NY". Too funny.
MikeL
|
29.2164 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 01 1992 13:34 | 14 |
| Yeah Denny, brings back some good memories. I was 13 years old and
lived and died with the Sox that summer. Even had a transistor radio to slip
under the pillow so I could catch the west coast games. My brother and I
watched the game over my grandmother's because our TV was one of those crappy
blue portable jobs with rabbit ears, while granny had a console model attached
to a real antenna. I think channel 5 did that game with Coleman, Martin and
Parnell swithcing assignments from radio to TV every few innings. What a game.
I remember going over to what was then Bert's Variety to listen to WHDH's
broadcast of the Tigers game against the Angels and the place was SRO. All I
can remember was the Tiger announcer saying that Al Kaline was on deck when
McAuliffe hit into the double play. What a time. If I only knew then what I
was getting suckered into. 8^)
/Don
|
29.2165 | Under Lufay's tutelage | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 01 1992 13:37 | 8 |
| Yea Slash,
Because of '67, yer legacy will forever be leading those poor
Japanese exchange students in doing the wave barechested (ah, you
that is).
8^),
MikeL
|
29.2166 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 01 1992 13:52 | 6 |
|
Nice little slice of American there, Slashman. I was seven years old
in '67 and the Boomer was my favorite player later to be replaced by
Reggie Smith and Joe LaHoud. I don't think kids get quite that juiced
about sports in geeneral and baseball in particular anymore but I could
be wrong.
|
29.2167 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Magic an egomanic or NBA=WWF? | Thu Oct 01 1992 14:29 | 6 |
|
Heck, I'm almost 29 and I don't get the juiced about baseball either...
:^)
of course now if you want talk "I wannabe like Mike".....the blood just
rushes to my head
|
29.2168 | ole Tiger great | FRETZ::HEISER | resident apologeticist | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:02 | 1 |
| Al Kaline, now there was a ball player!
|
29.2169 | hot rivalry | CNTROL::CHILDS | Magic an egomanic or NBA=WWF? | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:04 | 6 |
|
>>> Al Kaline, now there was a ball player!
but was he better than "the Yaz"?
mike
|
29.2170 | Jest gotta raise 'em right... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:08 | 8 |
|
> Nice little slice of American there, Slashman. I was seven years old
> in '67 and the Boomer was my favorite player later to be replaced by
> Reggie Smith and Joe LaHoud. I don't think kids get quite that juiced
> about sports in geeneral and baseball in particular anymore but I could
> be wrong.
Mine do!
|
29.2171 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:09 | 3 |
| Yeah, Glenn, but what choice do they have standing next to your
chair with beers on their li'l haids!
Denny
|
29.2172 | Parental influence is *so* important... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:14 | 6 |
|
Damn straight! One will do at home, but at Fenway you gotta have two
cuz that's the beer limit...
glenn
|
29.2173 | -1, Rollward glenn!!! | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:28 | 1 |
|
|
29.2174 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:41 | 8 |
| Mike -
Al Kaline > Yaz (And I was a big Yaz fan - until his last years...)
And while the 67 Impossible Dream was great - especially for a Sox fan in
da Bronx - the 69 Mets were one step better (I.E. they won teh champeenship..)
JD
|
29.2175 | 'SIXTY _ SEVEN ??????????? sheesh!!!! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Thu Oct 01 1992 21:41 | 15 |
|
Good grief Tommy!
In '67, when you wuz 7 years old, collecting cards and chewing the flat
pink gum and flipping and playin 'wallies with the "guys" and woulda
probably hurled if'n somebody suggested swappin spit with a GIRL,
I was a H.S. junior engrossed in the pursuit of doing just that!
ps - just to keep JaKe at bay, I was also a very successful pursuer!
Probably had a "hit" 60% of the time!
I remain,
younger than LeE and with fresher memories!
Kev
|
29.2176 | | FDCV06::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 01 1992 22:22 | 8 |
| I remember 67... I was in the 8th grade.. football.. starting left
linebacker on a team that went 8-0 267 points for and 18 against..
We were awesome.. ( The 72 team went 7-1-1 and won the State
championship NH "I" Division". I remember our caoch pulling us off the
field to listen to KEN COLEMAN call the games against the Cardinals..
Great Series...
REK
|
29.2177 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Oct 02 1992 10:57 | 4 |
| Wow, 67, what a great year, why I remem...hmm wait a minute, I wasn't
even born yet...never mind.
Marc
|
29.2178 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Oct 02 1992 11:24 | 12 |
| I was in 5th grade in 1967. Back then all World Series games were
played during the day; the kids in my class begged and pleaded with our
teacher to be able to listen to Game 1 during school time. We reached
a compromise where we could listen to the game, but had to prepare a
report on it as a homework assignment.
Not everyone in my class was rooting for the Sox -- there happened to
be a girl in my class who had moved to West Boylston from Missouri that
summer. Turned out she got the last laugh...
py
|
29.2179 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 02 1992 11:34 | 16 |
| > I was in 5th grade in 1967. Back then all World Series games were
> played during the day; the kids in my class begged and pleaded with our
> teacher to be able to listen to Game 1 during school time. We reached
> a compromise where we could listen to the game, but had to prepare a
> report on it as a homework assignment.
Me too.
Seems that the school bus NEVER got home fast enough. We were literally
incommunicado in school. No radio, no TV, no nothing.
Although I'm sure the principal was sitting on his pompous ass watching
it in the teachers lounge....
'Saw
|
29.2180 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Fri Oct 02 1992 11:52 | 27 |
|
Ah, the summer of '67. The best summer of my life, so far. Went to
the final game with some guys on a whim (we had no tickets), but got
there early enough to scarf some standing room on the first base side.
Went down on the field afterwards. Saw a lot of games that year, and
Yaz seemed to hit one out every time.
Took the T out to B.C. after the game to meet a friend and hung around
the campus. We had a radio, but we didn't need one since either everyone
that walked by had one (walkmen weren't invented yet), or the sounds of
the game could be heard coming from the open dorm windows. The place
just lit up when the Tigers lost.
Wish we had gone back to Kenmore square to kiss the girls again. (It
was the Summer of Love, after all. Scott McKenzie sang San Francisco,
The Doors did Light My Fire, Cream scored with Sunshine of Your Love,
and the Boston Common was Haight-Asbury East.)
Off to college, classes were cut to watch the games, but then again,
most of the teachers were seen in the student lounge glued to the tube
also. The student union building had "Yaz, sir, that's my baby" across
the windows of the top floor, a sign in front of the school proclaimed
"Yaz went here", and I was still a virgin.
Dickstah
|
29.2181 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Fri Oct 02 1992 12:00 | 5 |
| Sister Mary Jean, the Saint Bernard's High principal was such
a die-hard Red Sox fan that she had the World Series games piped
in through the school's intercom system.
/Don
|
29.2182 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Ok Dennis Leary, 2 words: Dave Edmunds | Fri Oct 02 1992 18:53 | 1 |
| I would start kindergarden the nexted year...
|
29.2183 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Fri Oct 02 1992 20:47 | 6 |
|
Walt, you are confused. It was 1_9_67, not 1_8_67.
HTH,
Brews
|
29.2184 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Ok Dennis Leary, 2 words: Dave Edmunds | Sun Oct 04 1992 20:17 | 4 |
| Yeah, I know Bruce... what class were you in when you heard about JFK?
-Walt (who was getting a 2 week checkup and doesn't remember that
event).
|
29.2185 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:21 | 14 |
|
Oldies 103 uses a character playing Joe Morgan (former manager of the
Red Sox) who calls in every so often. So he calls in this morning and
asks some basic questions like where did the Red Sox finish, how many
games worse than 1991. Then he asks:
What do the Red Sox have in common with 14 year old boys with zits on
their faces??
None of them can score
The Crazy Met
|
29.2186 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:34 | 7 |
| In some roster moves:
The Sox gave Brunansky and Pe�a 1 year contract extensions.
NESN fired Ned Martin.
The Angels have aquired Sox radio announcer Bob Starr.
|
29.2187 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:47 | 2 |
|
how the heck come Wade played yesterday? Why wasn't he protecting his average?
|
29.2188 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:49 | 6 |
| Why did they can Ned Martin? Did he ping on Clell one too many times?
Was he telling it like it is?
'Saw
|
29.2189 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:59 | 9 |
|
I liked Ned in his day, but that day is gone. I got the impression
that his mind just wasn't on the game anymore (didn't know the count,
the score, or who was at bat.) His enthusiasm was shot, but that could
be just a reflection of the team itself. Guess it's time for a change
all around.
Dickstah
|
29.2190 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:06 | 7 |
| � how the heck come Wade played yesterday? Why wasn't he protecting his average?
You don't protect that kind of average.
Actually I was wondering why Wade was in the game myself. According to
the Worcester T&G, Hobson said Wade wouldn't play in the season finale
since he injured his quadricep in Saturday's game.
|
29.2191 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:37 | 26 |
|
Endings We'd Like to See Dept:
It is the final game of the season. It is the bottom of the ninth.
The Sox trail 9-0, having given up runs on 4 errors, 5 walks, a passed
ball, and a wild pitch. The Sox themselves have left 16 runners on
base through a series double plays, pickoffs, and baserunning blunders.
As Jody steps to the plate, a rumbling is heard up in section 3. It
is the sound of booing. It is getting louder, and it is spreading.
Jody takes strike three down the middle, and the noise becomes louder.
Boggs taps to short for out number two, and the boos now rain down from
the grandstand, the bleachers, and even the roof boxes. Jack Clark
steps up to a tremendous uproar of boos and jeers. 34,000 people are
now on their feet, booing in unison. Nothing like this has ever been
seen at Fenway before. Clark takes strike two, and 34,000 fans
continue the uproar, while all 34,000 turn their backs to the lousy
team on the field. The noise becomes deafening, then begins to fade
as the fans file out.
The stands are completely empty when the umpire calls "Steerike three!"
Fitting, I'd say.
Dickstah
|
29.2192 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:47 | 7 |
| re: .2191
The fact that you start with the assumption that 34,000 fans are in the
park for such a game means that that ending will never happen.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2193 | | DUGROS::ROSS | Take a spin on DEC Death Spiral | Mon Oct 05 1992 15:32 | 5 |
| Token JD response:
Yeah, and if Clark happened to hit a HR rather than
strikeout, the fans would rush back in and chant,
"MVP, MVP, MVP. "
|
29.2194 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cowboys sip...... | Mon Oct 05 1992 15:37 | 6 |
|
And Don't forget if Clark hit that homer Lou Gorman would say
I knew he'd come through for us and Than he'd extend his contract.
Chap(PY)
|
29.2195 | | DUGROS::ROSS | Take a spin on DEC Death Spiral | Mon Oct 05 1992 15:44 | 21 |
| Solution to the Red Sox problems:
1. Fire Lou Gorman
2. Trade Burks/Plantier to Yankees for
Roberto Kelly
3. Release Jack Clark, Matt Young, Hatcher
4. Don't re-sign Boggs
5. Make following free agent offers but warn fans
ahead of time that signing these free agents
will require adding $2 per seat per game to ticket
prices
a. Ruben Sierra 5 years for $24 million
b. Barry Bonds 5 years for $26 million
c. Kirby Puckett 5 years for $26 million
6. Hire Don Baylor as batting coach.
7. Develop plan to expand Fenway by 10K seats by 1995
8. Trade Viola/Greenwell to Reds for Dibble/O'Neill
|
29.2196 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:00 | 7 |
|
re-1
Raising ticket prices by $2 will only pay for only one of those
signings.
Brews
|
29.2197 | PW Boggs | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:02 | 7 |
|
I was kinda refering to his lifetime average Mac. Which he did protect cause
after he went 1 for 2 he pulled himself out the game...
according to a quote I just read, he played cause wife told him too....
mike
|
29.2198 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:12 | 5 |
| � I was kinda refering to his lifetime average Mac. Which he did protect cause
� after he went 1 for 2 he pulled himself out the game...
Like I said, he was playing on bad wheels and wasn't supposed to be in
the game anyway.
|
29.2199 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:17 | 5 |
|
yeah the same bad wheels he had when Roger was out there strucking out Donbo
and Molitor while Wade was calling KFC......
wannna buy a bridge?
|
29.2200 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:20 | 6 |
| Even though Martin was not the same announcer he was when he
worked with Woods, he did deserve to go out better than this. Course
the Red Sox did the same thing to Woods when they let him go so
they're consistent, consistently classless.
/Don
|
29.2201 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:38 | 2 |
| 4 at bats at this stage in his career are not going to have a
significant impact on his BA.
|
29.2202 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:57 | 2 |
|
to a stats freak like him they certainly do mean something....
|
29.2203 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:58 | 4 |
| � to a stats freak like him they certainly do mean something....
I seriously doubt that a change in the sixth or seventh digit means
anything even to Wade Boggs.
|
29.2204 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 17:03 | 4 |
|
it means another hit he may never get.....
I guess at the rate this ine's going we'll have to agree to disagree...
|
29.2205 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 05 1992 17:31 | 19 |
|
If Wade's looking to protect his lifetime batting average, he'd better
retire, and quick. It drops almost five points during seasons like
1990 and 1992 (I'm not sure if you're serious or not, Mike C-- you do
keep us on our toes, though!).
What exactly did the Red Sox do to Ned Martin that was so classless?
He didn't want to go, so they fired him. Should they have publicly
announced that? This is *not* an Ernie Harwell situation. Martin is
69 years old, has faltered less than gracefully, and he's only working
NESN (which no one really cares about) anyway with one of the worst
announcers currently employed in the game, Jerry Remy. NESN's team is
so bad that I don't know why anyone would put up with it instead of
turning on the radio. Why are the Red Sox the only team in MLB that
can't replace a fading player, manager, or other employee without
public apology?
glenn
|
29.2206 | | FDCV06::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Tue Oct 06 1992 09:26 | 56 |
| Solution to the Red Sox problems:
> 1. Fire Lou Gorman
or
Hire an assistant who knows the minor league players...
> 2. Trade Burks/Plantier to Yankees for
> Roberto Kelly
Even the Yankees are not this stupid. The yanks have NO USE for
Red Sox OF's. With the Williams and Tartabull and the signing
of either Sierra or Bonds.... Plus Burks or Plantier could
carry Kelly's jock....
> 3. Release Jack Clark, Matt Young, Hatcher
Keep Hatcher as an 4th OF...
> 4. Don't re-sign Boggs
Depends on the price tag...
> 5. Make following free agent offers but warn fans
> ahead of time that signing these free agents
> will require adding $2 per seat per game to ticket
> price
> a. Ruben Sierra 5 years for $24 million
> b. Barry Bonds 5 years for $26 million
> c. Kirby Puckett 5 years for $26 million
This is a joke right? The bidding will start at 5 years 32 mil...
And I don't think either of these 3 want to come to Boston. Plus
JRY Corp. would never spend the money.....
> 6. Hire Don Baylor as batting coach.
Good move, but would he sign with Boston? I don't think so, he
wants to be a manager....
> 7. Develop plan to expand Fenway by 10K seats by 1995
Yeah.. Right! Where? I wish the place would BURN down so we could
get a real baseball park..... Fenway has passed its time....
> 8. Trade Viola/Greenwell to Reds for Dibble/O'Neill
Anoter pipe dream.. The Reds are not this stupid.... Look for
Dibble to end up in New York.. The Yankees.... Something like
a Roberto Kelly and one of the kid pitchers for Dibble...
REK
|
29.2207 | I guess Mike C will have to listen to the radio | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 06 1992 11:38 | 2 |
| Clemens will be a guest commentator for CBS during the championship
series television broadcasts.
|
29.2208 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Tue Oct 06 1992 12:05 | 7 |
|
No way Mac. He ought to udder some juicy tidbits for me to devour......
Glenn, I'm serious about Boggs. History show he's in love with two things
himself and his stats....
mike
|
29.2209 | Beats the heck out of Jerry Remy. | SALEM::DODA | Patriots: Red Sox in helmets | Tue Oct 06 1992 13:42 | 11 |
| Ever notice how as the game went on ole Ned would get more and
more mixed up? Wrong count, wrong batter, wrong inning...
Rumor was that Ned hit the beer stand early and often and as the
game went on, well, you get the idea...
I really enjoyed Martin and Starr, sober or not.
I doubt he'll catch on elsewhere if the rumors are true.
daryll
|
29.2210 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 09 1992 18:25 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 154.441 by PFSVAX::JACOB "Could Ted Williams bat .400 today?" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'd bet he could. For my money, the man had the best eye in baseball.
The Splendid Splinter....
'Saw
|
29.2211 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Oct 09 1992 18:51 | 9 |
| 'Saw
No debate that Williams had the best eye, or close to it, in baseball
history. But with all the relief specialists these days I am not so
sure if he would have hit .400 today. I wonder if anyone has stats on
how many hits Williams got in each inning of his .406 season.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2212 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Could Ted Williams bat .400 today? | Fri Oct 09 1992 19:21 | 13 |
| Personally, I doubt he could hit .400 today, maybe he could hit .200 or
.225, but definitely not .400.
My main reasoning for this stance is because
THE MAN IS 72 YEARS OLD!!!! How could a 72 year old have a quick enuf
bat to hit .400????
(8^)*
In search of a new p_name since ya finally picked up on it.
JaKe
|
29.2213 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 12 1992 09:20 | 19 |
| > THE MAN IS 72 YEARS OLD!!!! How could a 72 year old have a quick enuf
> bat to hit .400????
WRONG, Mr. Pittsburgh!
Ted Williams was born in 1918. I remember that because it's roughly
the same age as my Dad. That makes him 74, which is a year younger
than my dad.
About 10 years ago, however, there was some speculation that Williams,
if he shed some weight, could still hit well against Major Leauge pitching.
It was interesting to read, but I was doubtful.
While I've only seen Williams play in old film clips, I'd prefer to remember
him that way....
'Saw
|
29.2214 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Mon Oct 12 1992 16:44 | 12 |
|
>>WRONG, Mr. Pittsburgh!
>>Ted Williams was born in 1918. I remember that because it's roughly
So I was off by 2 years, I'll have to go back to the moron who told it
to ME and nail him to the wall.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
29.2215 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 13 1992 09:51 | 8 |
| > So I was off by 2 years, I'll have to go back to the moron who told it
> to ME and nail him to the wall.
Send me pictures....8^)
'Saw
|
29.2216 | Rumors rumors. | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:05 | 6 |
|
So, is Roooooooooger headed to Texas?
Inquiring minds...
/Jeff
|
29.2217 | no more Wade, no more Roger=real boring baseball | CNTROL::CHILDS | Would Saw dump a Harley for a Woman? | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:41 | 9 |
|
If he has his way he is. I say a quick interview with him on a golf course
and basically he said he wouldn't mind being traded at all. He liked Texas
lineup, said they had alot of hitting and potential...
please don't trade him Lou. ::Sports is in enough trouble already, if we
don't have Roger to kick around who will we have?
mike
|
29.2218 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:11 | 4 |
| Ya mean Roger bashing wouldn't be jsut as much fun if he were a Ranger? Why
not?
=Bob=
|
29.2219 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:20 | 5 |
|
cause you guys wouldn't be telling me he's God anymore. There also wouldn't
be 120 articles a week in the local rags about him. There is hope though
cause him and Canseco might get into a few who's better who's best contest
simular to him and Wade....
|
29.2220 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:58 | 5 |
| If the Sox trade Clemens then you know the team is being sold
and the balance sheet is being tidied up for the new owners. It
will also mean years and years of cellar dwelling.
/Don
|
29.2221 | cellar dwelling that is... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Tue Oct 13 1992 12:47 | 4 |
|
Well they got a good start on it this year.....
mike
|
29.2222 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:01 | 9 |
| Well, as the sport person on channel <?> said, "He'll never
be more valuable than he is right now."
If they plan on trading him, now, while he's still a dominating
pitcher, is the best time.
Whether they should EVER trade him is another issue.
Scott
|
29.2223 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:12 | 5 |
| � cause him and Canseco might get into a few who's better who's best contest
� simular to him and Wade....
Mike, you oughta right for the Herald. Or better yet, start a sports
section in the Enquirer.
|
29.2224 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:34 | 16 |
|
� cause him and Canseco might get into a few who's better who's best contest
� simular to him and Wade....
>> Mike, you oughta right for the Herald. Or better yet, start a sports
>> section in the Enquirer.
but Mac then you'd have to pay to read my stuff instead of getting it for
free....
;^)
FWIW, I agree with what Tim MaCaver said about the situation the other
night but don't expect me to repeat it...
;^)
|
29.2225 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Tue Oct 13 1992 16:28 | 5 |
|
Mike, who pays for the ENquirer? That's what long lines at the grocery
store are for...
Brews
|
29.2226 | didn't know Boston dumped him | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:54 | 1 |
| How did Dan Schneider get on the Braves?
|
29.2227 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:00 | 4 |
| SnideAir was traed lasted August for a couple of minor league
"prospects".
/Don
|
29.2228 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:03 | 6 |
| ...and speaking of the Slobs this Clemens for Gonzales would
be vintage Red Sox. I mean Juan is the quintessential Red Soxer.
He hits a ton of homeruns (none in the clutch), and he plods along
in the outfield like a Clydesdale.
/Don
|
29.2229 | | ROYALT::ASHE | and I'm bringin Deion & his big bad K... | Thu Oct 15 1992 18:54 | 2 |
| Something about going to wear Columbia blue uni's...
|
29.2230 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 15 1992 19:04 | 2 |
| I knew... Schnide and Reardon are the same person !!
|
29.2231 | need help from Red Sox fans - can't believe I said that | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Thu Oct 15 1992 21:47 | 11 |
| While drowning away his sorrows, Bill came up with another possible
measure - other than the dreaded ex-Cubs factor - in trying to
determine who will win a series. This could be especially important
since an ex-Cubs factor differential of one is considered to be
meaningless. So the question for all you Red Sox mavens is how many
ex-Red Sox are there on the rosters of Atlanta and Toronto.
Reardon is obviously one on the Braves.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2232 | Nobody help out Craze, let him figure it out hisself! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 15 1992 21:53 | 0 |
29.2233 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 01:38 | 7 |
| re: .2232
Don't be a spoil sport just because you don't know enough to help out
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.2234 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Pipsqueak Aryan Cabbagehead | Fri Oct 16 1992 09:57 | 8 |
| <<< Note 29.2227 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow" >>>
>
> SnideAir was traed lasted August for a couple of minor league
> "prospects".
Whattabout Billy Hatcher?
Mark.
|
29.2235 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:17 | 5 |
| � Whattabout Billy Hatcher?
Whatabout him? He was aquired from Cincy for Tom Bolton. The last I
heard, the Sox bought out his option for next year and may try to
resign him for less than his original contract called for.
|
29.2236 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:26 | 5 |
| I think Reardone might be it, Craze.
Why do you think these two teams made it to the Series?
MikeL
|
29.2237 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:32 | 3 |
| There has been no documented "ex-Red Sox jinx". The "ex-Cub jinx" only
holds for the World Series and has no bearing on either of the
championship series.
|
29.2238 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 11:00 | 7 |
| re: .2237
Reread my note MtM! We were developing a new indicator if the ex-Cubs
factor was not applicable in a given year. Sheesh some people :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.2239 | It's almost that time of year again... pick the winner... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 23 1992 10:24 | 15 |
|
We need to update this list. Any predictions?
1992-- Roger is good, but he's no ???? ?????? (sidebar: what a stinking
bum that Jack Morris is!).
1991-- Roger is good, but he's no Jack Morris.
1990-- Roger is good, but he's no Jose Rijo (sidebar: what a choke
artist that Dave Stewart is!).
1989-- Roger is good, but he's no Dave Stewart.
1988-- Roger is good, but he's no Orel Hershiser.
1987-- Roger is good, but he's no Frank Viola.
glenn
|
29.2240 | easy " No John Smoltz " | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Fri Oct 23 1992 10:27 | 0 |
29.2241 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Buckner...Eckersley...Reardon? | Fri Oct 23 1992 18:03 | 3 |
| The p-name above is a list of ex-Sox who screwed up a World Series
for their team... any others?
|
29.2242 | I got a good chuckle out of it | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Mon Oct 26 1992 09:40 | 4 |
|
Did you guys enjoy the World Series moment they showed saturday nite??
;^)
|
29.2243 | this is getting old | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:09 | 1 |
| So how many more years before the Bambino's curse expires?
|
29.2244 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Mon Oct 26 1992 11:24 | 7 |
|
> So how many more years before the Bambino's curse expires?
It expires with the Second Coming of the Bambino to Boston.
|
29.2245 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Mon Oct 26 1992 11:50 | 7 |
|
re: .2242
Immensely!
The Crazy Met
|
29.2246 | | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Mon Oct 26 1992 11:59 | 4 |
| that's too bad. It's pretty sad when an expansion team does in 16
years what the BoSox have been trying to do in the last 75 years.
Mike
|
29.2247 | Other teams have done it too | SALES::THILL | | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:13 | 23 |
| re expansion team
The quickest championship for an expansion team was the NY Mets who won
the whole enchilada in their 8th year, 1969. The Globe had a table with
the records of various expansion teams, with the best they've ever
done. From memory it looks something like this:
Team 1st year best finish year
Angels 1961 Div Champs 1979
*Rangers 1961 2nd in Div 1974
Mets 1962 World Champs 1969 8th year
Astros 1962 Div Champs 1980
Royals 1969 World Champs 1985 17th year
+Brewers 1969 League Champs 1982
Padres 1969 League Champs 1984
Expos 1969 Div Champs 1981
Blue Jays 1977 World Champs 1992 16th year
Mariners 1977 4th place 19??
Tom
* Originally Washington Senators (2nd edition)
+ Originally Seattle Pilots
|
29.2248 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Buckner...Eckersley...Reardon? | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:54 | 6 |
| I was at the Ground Round near Alewife Saturday night. When the
flashback came on, everyone booed and hissed or laughed, depening
on who you rooted for I guess. Everyone booed and hissed when
Reardon started warming up in the pen... except for the 2 Jays
fans who cheered...
|
29.2249 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie's formula - $70/case | Tue Oct 27 1992 10:03 | 3 |
| �ROYALT::ASHE "Buckner...Eckersley...Reardon?"
Johnny Pesky
|
29.2250 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 27 1992 10:08 | 15 |
| >Johnny Pesky
Not!
There was an article the day after that didn't BLAM him, and I recently
saw a special where they talked about the play and said that Pesky
was not too BLAM, someone else was.....
8^)
'Saw
|
29.2251 | If it sounds good, run with it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 27 1992 10:13 | 8 |
|
Pesky was not to BLAM, but he still fits in the p-string. Buckner was
not so much to BLAM as Schiraldi or Stanley, but then again they didn't
auction off the Steamer's wild one at $95,000, either. Extra points are
awarded for mythological content...
glenn
|
29.2252 | Jim Burton, Mike Torrez, Luis Aparicio,Yaz | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 27 1992 12:17 | 1 |
|
|
29.2253 | | SALEM::DODA | Patriots: Red Sox in helmets | Tue Oct 27 1992 12:50 | 3 |
| Yaz cost em? when? Add Rich "All-star indeed" Gedman.
daryll
|
29.2254 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 27 1992 13:00 | 2 |
| Perhaps he was referring to Yaz' popout in the final at bat in the '78
playoff game.
|
29.2255 | Maybe unfair | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 27 1992 13:02 | 9 |
| Yaz,
Last at bat, 1975 and 1978. Didn't bring the bacon home. Maybe unfair
'cuz he did fine during the games, but I'll always remember hin making
the last out ( remember Rooster on third in '78 and the fly to Geronimo
in '75).
JMHO
MikeL
|
29.2256 | | SALEM::DODA | Patriots: Red Sox in helmets | Tue Oct 27 1992 13:35 | 11 |
| Frankly, I think it is unfair. He didn't cost the sox the game.
The game was lost earlier in both cases.
Yaz' playoff and WS numbers are excellent. If you toss in the
final series in '67 and the '78 playoff game, he hit well over
.400.
But then again, I'm slightly biased.
daryll
|
29.2257 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 27 1992 13:54 | 10 |
| I put him in there because he was in a position to win it and didn't.
Unfair, yes, I'll agree for your reasons. I do not remember him as
a goat at all, just as the last forelorn figure against the crushing
weight of the Curse ( how'd i do, 'Saw).
But I'll still keep him there.
MikeL
|
29.2258 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:46 | 7 |
| > a goat at all, just as the last forelorn figure against the crushing
> weight of the Curse ( how'd i do, 'Saw).
Classic, MikeL, classic.
The imagery it conjures up is superb......
|
29.2259 | Whatta guy! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Nov 05 1992 10:06 | 9 |
|
Word has it that Roger Clemens has stolen the show both on and off the
field on the current US All-Stars' trip to Japan. He closed out his two
appearances with a 1-0 record, 12 IP, 4 H, 15 Ks, and a 0.00 ERA. The
Japanese are enamored with his gracious and accomodating personality,
bundled up in the new Roger the Inquisitive World Traveler package...
glenn
|
29.2260 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Thu Nov 05 1992 11:15 | 3 |
|
Has he thrown any egg rolls at the Japanese sportswriters yet?
|
29.2261 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Fri Nov 06 1992 09:22 | 7 |
|
The Sox announced that they would *not* raise ticket prices nexted
year. That means A) They wouldn't dare after last season, B) You
won't see them sign any decent free agents, C) Both.
Dickstah
|
29.2262 | Jerk!! | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Nov 18 1992 09:47 | 15 |
| Anyone care to supply the logic in this draft??
Gorman gives Colorado a Wedgie. This kid hit 5 more homers at
Fenway in a limited role than WhifferJack did! This guy cain hit.
How the hail can they project how "bad" his elbow is?
Stupid, dumb. Lou should be fired.
In the second round no less! Who the hail the Sox pull back after Reed
was lost? This is inexcusable.
Now we get a whole winter of excuses by Sox brass. Gorman be on the
defensive all year. Nice going Lou. The fans'll be nasty in April.
MikeL
|
29.2263 | Dumb jerk | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie's formula - $70/case | Wed Nov 18 1992 09:59 | 18 |
| Mikey, I agree.
I can't understand them not protecting Wedge in the first
place, but to pass on an opportunity to pull him back? I
just don't get it.
There is talk (of course denied by Lou Moron-Gorman) that the Red Sox are
pissed at Wedge because he usurped Dr. Pappas for hsi surgery. If this was
the issue, the Red Sox are cutting off their nose to spite their face, with
no other catcher in the system. Even if he never catches another game, he
has a better bat than any DH on the roster.
I dunno, Rich Gedman is a free agent, maybe they are planning on
signing him.
Looks like I'll be tuning in to TBS this summer.
=Bob=
|
29.2264 | Bobby, I heard Rick Cerone is available | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Nov 18 1992 10:06 | 1 |
|
|
29.2265 | I agree MikeL, LOU MUST GO -- NOW! | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Calling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.Howard | Wed Nov 18 1992 10:20 | 0 |
29.2266 | Sox sip, that explains it all... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Watchin' Scotty throw... | Wed Nov 18 1992 12:12 | 1 |
|
|
29.2267 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Wed Nov 18 1992 12:17 | 3 |
| How cain you guys say this stuff about Lou? We all know what a judge
a young talent he is! Why look at how that stiff Bagwell turned out!
Denny
|
29.2268 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Wed Nov 18 1992 12:31 | 3 |
| you guys and gals could refuse to go to games this year. As long as that
turnstile click 2 + million times a year they aren't going to change their
ways or better yet sell the team....
|
29.2269 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Wed Nov 18 1992 12:54 | 5 |
| Nobody cain afford to buy the Socks as long as they're in Fenway
Pahk. The team and Fenway would cost $200 million. Just the interest
alone would be a killer, then add in the salaries. Who can pay for that
@3x,000 fans per game?
Denny
|
29.2270 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:00 | 6 |
|
Denny you telling me that Fenway is worth 194 + million. I subtracted the
5 + million they pay his Highness cause he's the only value on that sorry
team....
;^)
|
29.2271 | Ah, Lou,I REALLY don't mind if ya trade me!! | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Nov 18 1992 13:15 | 8 |
| Interesting point mikey,
With Rog openly questioning the Sox commitment to winning, wonder
if he'll be calling Lou soon. Asking the same questions we are....
Hmmmm
MikeL
|
29.2272 | I wish they would be sold, and quickly... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Nov 19 1992 13:37 | 20 |
|
> Nobody cain afford to buy the Socks as long as they're in Fenway
> Pahk. The team and Fenway would cost $200 million. Just the interest
> alone would be a killer, then add in the salaries. Who can pay for that
> @3x,000 fans per game?
On the other hand, while perhaps they could do better in a larger park,
that's still one of the highest attendances in baseball. How do the
other teams survive? Add in NESN, good TV and radio deals, and
merchandising and the Sox are in the top 5 in baseball in total revenues.
If the JRY Corp decides it wants to sell the Sox, the price they'll get
is what the market will bear, no more, no less.
Make no mistake, the Boston Red Sox are a money-making machine.
They've got it too good. I'd be surprised if the team couldn't find a
taker for an almost guaranteed $10M/year profit on $80M in revenues.
Imagine the possibilities if the team was well-managed!
glenn
|
29.2273 | the players they lost back then? TRAGIC!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Thu Nov 19 1992 13:45 | 5 |
|
That's why Jean should have sold the team to ATT way back when....
mike
|
29.2274 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Mon Dec 07 1992 11:13 | 3 |
| Heard on the radio this AM that Lou has turned his sights on Mark
McGwire. He's also close to bringing Bruce Hurst back to Boston.
Denny
|
29.2275 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Mon Dec 07 1992 12:13 | 3 |
| Keep selling those tickets Lou...
/Don
|
29.2276 | Hiding out in the 'Sox note. How weak! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 07 1992 12:16 | 7 |
| /Don, I *demand* you move yourself over to note 17 IMMEDIATELY and
answer the rather serious charges that you've been convicted of lying.
Huf.
- ACC Chris
|
29.2277 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 07 1992 12:17 | 7 |
|
Stupid bleep. Lou won't stop until he's totally destroyed what's left
of this ballclub. As soon as I heard the name Bruce Hurst I knew there
was trouble brewing...
glenn
|
29.2278 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Mon Dec 07 1992 12:22 | 3 |
| Now that you're back, I'm glad I'm leaving CrooKed...
/Don
|
29.2279 | Just come clean Robichaud! (Repeat: GO TAR HEEL!!) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:18 | 5 |
| Careful, /Don, or I might not write you_a teary-eyed eulogy like I did
BobHunt.
- ACC Chris
|
29.2280 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:52 | 5 |
|
Is he going to claim that Hurst is the lefty that he promised to
get to replace Hurst?
|
29.2281 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Marge Schott: Designated Hitler | Tue Dec 08 1992 09:21 | 3 |
|
The Sox have not offered Wade Boggs arbitration. He's outa there.
|
29.2282 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:26 | 10 |
| Viola was the lefty to replace Hurst.
I can't believe that didn't offer Boggs arbitration. After what he's
done for the Sox, they at least owed him that. Doesn't that mean they
won't be compensated if Boggs does sign with someone else as a free
agent?
People talk about lack of loyalty from the players when guys like Hurst
and Boddicker left. Where's the squawks about owner and fan loyalty
when something like this happens?
|
29.2283 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:34 | 2 |
| Lost when they offered him $9 million for 2 years and he said no, he
could do better at the start of the season...
|
29.2284 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I must not think Bad Thoughts | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:45 | 6 |
|
Boggs has never been loyal to the team so why the heck do they owe him
anything Mac? He's never ever thought of anybody but himself so I think
the Soxs did the right thing...
mike
|
29.2285 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:52 | 6 |
| Oh yes, the old tired "selfish Wade" routine.
The guy has always quietly signed his contracts, never attempted to
renegotiate a contract, took extra fielding and batting practice, led
his team in runs scored, BA, and OBP for most of his career, and he's
called selfish.
|
29.2286 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I must not think Bad Thoughts | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:59 | 6 |
| that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
batting average is selfish IMO. All that extra batting and crap you spout off
about was done to protect his own individual stats. Especially the fielding
where he sucked pondwater and had/has the range of three toed sloth....
mike
|
29.2287 | They get progressively smaller | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:01 | 5 |
| >> Lost when they offered him $9 million for 2 years and he
>> said no, he could do better at the start of the season...
Poor Wade. Any DECcie could have told him, "Always take the
first package."
|
29.2288 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:08 | 17 |
| �that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
�batting average is selfish IMO.
Keep in mind that his team had already clinched a playoff spot when he
decided to sit. What would have happened if he hurt himself worse
trying to pad his stats during a meaningless game?
�All that extra batting and crap you spout off
�about was done to protect his own individual stats.
That's right. I forgot that performing your best has a negative impact
on the team as a whole.
�Especially the fielding
�where he sucked pondwater and had/has the range of three toed sloth....
You're right. It was selfish of him to try to improve his fielding.
|
29.2289 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:09 | 13 |
| Putting the selfish stuff aside.
Let me ask a question.
If the Sox opffered arbitration, yet Boggs opted to sign with someone
else, wouldn't they get two draft choices? Seems to me they should
have, business-wise, offered the arbitration in trying to garner at
least a couple of draft choices.
MikeL
BTW, FWIW
Boggs was selfish between the chalk marks.
|
29.2290 | See P'Name | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:14 | 9 |
|
Right and runs scored are because of the players behind him
he always thought RBI's meant Ruins BOGGS's Individual Stats. Thatsd
why he never tried to get many....:-)
Wade is Loyal to noone but him self (ask his wife she'll tell ya)
Chappy
|
29.2291 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:18 | 5 |
| Mike -
Don't argue with Mac. He's always right.
JD
|
29.2292 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:23 | 8 |
|
Wade rolled the dice and they came up craps. If'n he had hit .360
instead of .260, he'd be in the drivers seat, but he didn't. Now, he's
going to get paid exactly what people think he's worth - no more, no less.
Anybody have any idea what third basemen, who hit.260 with no power, have
the range of a Maytag washer and the foot speed of Tip O'Neil on quaaludes,
are going for these days ?
|
29.2293 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:34 | 22 |
| Article 9496 of clari.sports.misc:
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc
Subject: Tuesday Sports Transactions
Keywords: misc sports
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 9:04:49 PST
ACategory: sports
Slugword: transactions
Priority: regular
Format: table
ANPA: Wc: 125; Id: z3253; Sel: xxsz.; Adate: 12-8-1205pes; Ver: 127/0
Approved: [email protected]
Codes: &sz.axx., tnrb...., txia....
Lines: 14
Baseball
Boston -- Traded pitchers Mike Gardiner and Terry Powers to
Montreal for outfielder Ivan Calderon; signed free agent pitcher Scott
Bankhead to a two-year contract.
|
29.2294 | Parade in October.....in Toronto! | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:37 | 1 |
|
|
29.2295 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:37 | 59 |
| Article 19281 of clari.sports.baseball:
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.baseball:19281 clari.local.massachusetts:747 clari.news.canada:1521
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.local.massachusetts,clari.news.canada
Subject: Red Sox acquire Calderon, Bankhead
Keywords: baseball, men's professional
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 9:04:49 PST
Location: massachusetts, canada
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-meetings-boston
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 365; Id: z3232; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 12-8-1158aes
Approved: [email protected]
Codes: ysbprxx., &sbprma., &sbprcn., tnrb....
Lines: 36
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (UPI) -- The Boston Red Sox Tuesday traded pitchers
Mike Gardiner and Terry Powers to Montreal for outfielder Ivan Calderon,
then signed free agent Scott Bankhead to a two-year contract.
Calderon, 30, appeared in 48 games with Montreal and hit .265 with
three home runs and 24 RBI. On June 24, he had arthroscopic surgey on
his left shoulder and spent most of the year on the disabled list. After
his return from the DL in September, Calderon batted .305 the rest of
the season.
In 1991, Calderon led Montreal with a .300 average, 19 home runs and
75 RBI in 134 games. He was selected to the National League All-Star
team that year as well.
A nine-year major league veteran, Calderon has a .277 lifetime
average with 103 home runs and 422 RBI in 842 games. He played for
Seattle from 1984-86, the Chicago White Sox from 1986-90, and Montreal
from 1991-92.
``Ivan gives us a solid contact hitter with some power and a player
who can drive in runs,'' Boston general manager Lou Gorman said. ``He
will be used primarily as a DH (designated hitter) and also play some
outfield.''
Gardiner, acquired by the Red Sox from Seattle prior to the 1991
season, was 9-10 with a 4.85 ERA in 22 starts in 1991, and 4-10 with a
4.75 ERA in 28 games in 1992.
Powers, 21, was the Red Sox's 10th round pick in the June 1990 draft.
In 21 starts for Winter Haven in '92, he was 5-10 with a 4.51 ERA.
Bankhead, 29, who pitched for Cincinnati this season, agreed to a
two-year deal. Terms were not disclosed.
He was 10-4 with a 2.93 ERA and one save in 54 relief appearances
with the Reds, holding opponents to a .218 batting average against. He
won eight of his first nine decisions, and was 9-2 with a 1.94 ERA at
the All-Star break.
Bankhead began his major league career with Kansas City in 1986. He
was a first-round pick in the June 1984 draft out of the University of
North Carolina.
``Scott is a very versatile pitcher who can be used as either a
reliever or a starter,'' Gorman said. ``He is an outstanding athlete and
competitor. He will add additional depth overall to our pitching staff.''
|
29.2296 | You can get lots of RBI's that way too | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 08 1992 13:38 | 6 |
| � Right and runs scored are because of the players behind him
� he always thought RBI's meant Ruins BOGGS's Individual Stats. Thatsd
� why he never tried to get many....:-)
Thanks for the help, Chappy. I completely forgot that you can score
runs without having anyone on base.
|
29.2297 | Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 08 1992 14:08 | 6 |
|
Hr????? :-)
BTW I believe Calderon's contract is at 3 Mil a year. What a
deal huh?
|
29.2298 | As old as baseball itself | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 08 1992 14:36 | 8 |
|
> that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
> batting average is selfish IMO.
Like George Brett did two years ago? He admitted it!
glenn
|
29.2299 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Dec 08 1992 14:42 | 12 |
| >> that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
>> batting average is selfish IMO.
>
> Like George Brett did two years ago? He admitted it!
Not many guys left like the Splendid Splinter, who played the second
game of a double header after finishing the first at .401. A manly
man, he finished at .406....
'Saw
|
29.2300 | feel better Glenn? :^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | I must not think Bad Thoughts | Tue Dec 08 1992 14:50 | 1 |
| Geroge Brett is a shelfish bum....
|
29.2301 | Hope his wife ain't allergic to shelfish 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 08 1992 15:02 | 1 |
|
|
29.2302 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Tue Dec 08 1992 15:37 | 2 |
| At least he was man enough to admit he was a selfish bum...
|
29.2303 | I think not!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 08 1992 16:35 | 10 |
|
Besides if we are talking about 1986 when The Wade man sat out
the last 4 games of the season against the Yanks when Donbo was just
three points behind him for the batting title.
Wade reported he had a hamstring pull. But he than went on to
steal a base in the 3rd inning of the 1st playoff game. He must be a
fast healer Huh!
|
29.2304 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Wed Dec 09 1992 13:23 | 2 |
| Randy Myers signed today.... with the Cubs...
|
29.2305 | But where will we play him...for real | SALES::THILL | | Wed Dec 09 1992 15:11 | 4 |
| I heard on WBCN that the Soxes signed Andre Dawson....and were "about
to sign" Tom Henke...
Tom
|
29.2306 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Thu Dec 10 1992 10:35 | 8 |
| Melendez,Fletcher,Calderon,Bankhead,Dawson.
Rumor has it that the Sox will tender offers to anyone who played
in the now defunct Senior League. Middle relievers and outfielders
are especially needed.
MikeL
|
29.2307 | So much for reducing the payroll, Lou | SALES::THILL | | Thu Dec 10 1992 10:41 | 6 |
| I soar on the news lasted night that the Soxes dumped about $10.5
million in salaries, but added $12.5 million. This is including $3.3
million for Henke, which people seem to think is almost a done deal.
Then again, I heard that 3 other teams were in the running....
Tom
|
29.2308 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Thu Dec 10 1992 11:53 | 4 |
| Same old Sox. Building a team that will sell tickets in December
not win pennants in October...
/Don
|
29.2309 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Thu Dec 10 1992 12:32 | 2 |
| People in Texas think they've got a shot at Henke too...
|
29.2310 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Dec 10 1992 12:51 | 4 |
| I'm glad I didn't say that /Don. I'd be accussed of war crimes or
something by the fearsome-twosome.
JD
|
29.2311 | :^) | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCG Product Management | Thu Dec 10 1992 12:59 | 4 |
| JD, you just gotsta get your money back on that Dale Carnegie course
you took.
Mark.
|
29.2312 | Is Hoyt Wilhelm available? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie ate baby food!!! | Thu Dec 10 1992 15:05 | 2 |
| Henke definitely qualifies as someone the Red Sox should go after - he's 38, and
has his best years behind him...
|
29.2313 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Thu Dec 10 1992 16:10 | 2 |
| I thought he was only 35...
|
29.2314 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie ate baby food!!! | Thu Dec 10 1992 16:14 | 3 |
| � I thought he was only 35...
Oh, well that makes it much better... 8^)
|
29.2315 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 10 1992 17:09 | 3 |
| Melendez is only 27.
What's next, Lou? Going to recruit from the Gray Sox?
|
29.2316 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Life after DEC! | Fri Dec 11 1992 09:29 | 3 |
| Every Sox game is also a old timers game! Maybe they'll charge 2
admissions!
Denny
|
29.2317 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Fri Dec 11 1992 10:59 | 2 |
| They missed Tanana... he signed with the Mets...
|
29.2318 | but they found this one | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 14 1992 22:28 | 7 |
|
In a move guaranteed to solve all their problems, the Red Sox signed:
Bob Melvin
The Crazy Met
|
29.2319 | WHO?! | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Tue Dec 15 1992 00:18 | 1 |
|
|
29.2320 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 15 1992 00:57 | 6 |
| I know he was a backup on the SF Giants, spent time in KC, and I think
1 or 2 other cities - most definitely the franchise type player the Red
Sox have been looking for :-)
The Crazy Met
|
29.2321 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Dec 15 1992 08:45 | 7 |
| ;-)
Melvin is the 'catcherbetterthanSteinbach' that Lou Gorman promised! ;-)
Parade down 5th avenue in November!!! (Sponsered by Macy's!)
JD
|
29.2322 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Tue Dec 15 1992 10:01 | 2 |
| He spent some time in Bal'mo' too..
|
29.2323 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 15 1992 12:22 | 6 |
| �Melvin is the 'catcherbetterthanSteinbach' that Lou Gorman promised! ;-)
When did he promise this? I thought he considered the Sox to be set
for catching when he resigned Pe�a.
I wouldn't want to be Marzano today.
|
29.2324 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Scott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHero | Tue Dec 15 1992 12:38 | 3 |
| Great! I got Bob Melvin's rookie card!
/Don_for_Denny
|
29.2325 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Tue Dec 15 1992 17:38 | 2 |
|
Hey TCM, tell us about those great MEts signings.
|
29.2326 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 15 1992 17:46 | 11 |
| Brews, back in October I was hoping (see NYM notesfile) that the Mets would
not make radical changes. Sure the Mets were mediocre in 1992, but a good
option was to let a team that underwent radical changes after the 1991
season to gel into a team for the 1993 season. Mets have question marks:
Gooden, Saberhagen, HoJo, Bonilla to some extent. They made a good move
in picking up Tony Fernandez. The Mets, unlike the Red Sox, never made
any commitment to make wholesale changes via trades or the free agent market
for the 1993 season. It is in that context that the Red Sox have made some
bonehead, or at the very least questionable, moves.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2327 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Tue Dec 15 1992 17:53 | 3 |
| bonehead moves?
look at the '86 team that was to "contend for years." Wha happened?
|
29.2328 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 15 1992 21:22 | 10 |
| Yeah Mets made some real bad moves as well. But consider that the 1986
team contended in 1987, won the division in 1988, contended in 1989 and
1990 and then fell apart in late August of 1991. Not too shabby. Not
you said contend and that is what I am responding too. 1986-1990 is
5 years. Go back to 1984 and that was 7 years.
Also consider that whether or not the Mets made bad moves it does not
in anyway justify what the Red Sox did or did not do.
The Crazy Met
|
29.2329 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 16 1992 10:06 | 4 |
| Allegedly the Sox were offered Fernandez but declined because they were
looking for an outfielder. Let's see. They have about 20 OF/DH/1B
types and 1 legit shortstop who hasn't played a full season in the
major leagues.
|
29.2330 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Scott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHero | Wed Dec 16 1992 12:02 | 5 |
| WEEI's morning drive time DJs are having a "Boggs Bash" this
Friday night somewhere near Boston. I hear that Dan Schneider is
driving up for the occasion.
/Don
|
29.2331 | Brain cramp | SHARE::DERRY | Eggnog? Ick. | Fri Dec 18 1992 06:51 | 2 |
| So the Sox, who had to keep Burks on the very very protected list, now
let him go and get zilch in return.
|
29.2332 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Dec 18 1992 08:44 | 9 |
| re :. 2331
But, but, but its all part of ....
The Plan
The Crazy Met
|
29.2333 | uh | SALEM::DODA | Save the wails | Fri Dec 18 1992 10:06 | 1 |
| I thought Burks was left unprotected and nobody wanted him?
|
29.2334 | Stoopider and stoopider | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie ate baby food!!! | Fri Dec 18 1992 10:25 | 14 |
| �I thought Burks was left unprotected and nobody wanted him?
I think thye pulled him back after Reed was taken. It was either that or
he was protected from the start.
The incredibly stoopid thing about this is that they could have left him
unprotected, and kept the aforementioned Eric Wedge. They had no clue at
that point what they were doing, and probably only decided yesterday.
This franchise is clueless.
Go Braves...
=Bob=
|
29.2335 | Yes, stoopid indeed... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 18 1992 10:37 | 24 |
|
Actually, Bob, the Sox only protected Burks after the round in which
Wedge was taken. That doesn't prove much, though. Burks is not the
kind of player that the expansion clubs were after (Wedge is, dammit!),
but that doesn't mean there is no interest in him. There is.
The Sox let Burks go because he's one of the few guys with a decent
salary which isn't guaranteed. A healthy Burks is needed by the Sox
much more than $3M Mike Greenwell, especially with Ivan Calderon on the
scene. There is no interest in Greenwell at that price. Keep that in
mind the next time the Red Sox PR machine springs into action, claiming
that Greenie is swinging the bat really well and he's healthy and
excited about the 1993 season. After all, it was only a month ago that
the Sox claimed that Burks' medical prognosis was encouraging. Hell,
half this team will spend a third of the season in the doctor's office,
so you can't tell me that Burks is the exception.
Yes, this ballclub is clueless. By June, Ivan Calderon will be in
centerfield, breaking in on balls that are hit over his head, with the
Fenway patrons rolling the aisles with laughter (but only to keep from
crying).
glenn
|
29.2336 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie ate baby food!!! | Fri Dec 18 1992 10:50 | 7 |
| � Yes, this ballclub is clueless. By June, Ivan Calderon will be in
� centerfield, breaking in on balls that are hit over his head, with the
� Fenway patrons rolling the aisles with laughter (but only to keep from
� crying).
I, for one, will not be included among those patrons thised year.
|
29.2338 | Had to be said... | ICS::FINUCANE | | Fri Dec 18 1992 12:18 | 6 |
|
Sox management/DEC management....
One in the same? 8-}
C
|
29.2339 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Dec 22 1992 08:55 | 18 |
| And now from the "Is This Guy For Real ?" Dept...
Ole Wade now says that his back problems may have been stress
related. Wade says that his back stiffened up immediately after
a reporter informed him that Clemens said he believed Boggs was
not behind him in his quest for a fourth Cy Young Award because
Boggs questioned a scoring decision that was reversed and cost
Clemens two earned runs.
"By the time I got to the clubhouse, I sat down and I could bare-
ly move," Boggs said.
|
29.2340 | Wade does New Yawk | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie ate baby food!!! | Tue Dec 22 1992 09:25 | 10 |
| RE: -1
As indicated in Nick Cafardo's column in the Boston Globe today, the NY media is
going to LOVE this guy.
Pyscosematic bad backs, willing himslf invisible, falling out of jeeps,
Margogate, all "who cares" stuff to most, but definite back page material for
the Daily News.
=Bob=
|
29.2341 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Tue Dec 22 1992 09:29 | 4 |
|
I guess Wade has proven the old adage that the truth hurts.
Brews
|
29.2342 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:41 | 4 |
| Gee, I read the paper quickly this morning and I thought it said that Wade sat
out alot because he was a stiff.
j.
|
29.2343 | Psychosomatic bad back... The dude's twisted | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:59 | 10 |
| As was said before,
Then Noo Yawk press is gonna love this guy. Best thing for his career,
he'll remake the Daily News and the Post. Can't wait until he starts
talking in the third person. Don Imus will have a field
day on FAN. Too bad Howard Stern ain't at WOR anymore. Wade woulda fit
in quite well.
Open up your doors, George, here comes your new eccentric!
MikeL
|
29.2344 | | SHARE::DERRY | Eggnog? Ick. | Wed Dec 30 1992 07:48 | 5 |
| Rog notified the team that he'll show up for camp at least 10 days
later than the other pitchers and catchers.
Wonder if this is going to be the top story, for days, come late
February...
|
29.2345 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Pete Pavia a true American Hero | Wed Dec 30 1992 07:55 | 7 |
| think the extra 10 days off are his way of protesting the Soxs letting go of
Boggs??
Don't think so, he probably needs the 10 days to sober up from all the partying
he'll be doing to celebrate the release of Boggs...
I hope like heck he beans Boggs this coming year....make him a real SuperHero
|
29.2346 | Expecting (hoping for?) the typical Sox overreaction... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 30 1992 09:11 | 13 |
|
Without making a real ugly scene of it, Clemens is doing what he can
here and there in an effort to get himself traded. Who can blame him?
He's already seen what getting on village idiot Butch Hobson's bad side
did for Phil Plantier and a host of others. Anyway, trading Clemens
would be the final master stroke in Lou Gorman's ingenious plan to make
the Red Sox cellar-dwellers for the next decade to come. What the
hell; I'm so disgusted with the Red Sox at this point that I almost
wouldn't mind the thought of Clemens pounding the Sox 4-5 times a year
as he moves on to the higher things that the Sox can't give him...
glenn
|
29.2347 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Wed Dec 30 1992 09:21 | 6 |
| Hmmm, he could be the one starter the Twins are looking for.
;*)
Spud
|
29.2348 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Wed Dec 30 1992 11:48 | 4 |
| Well Glenn, at least if the Sox traded Roger, MikeC would stop
chastising him.
/Don
|
29.2349 | don't do it Lou | CNTROL::CHILDS | Liz Smith wants Madonna's body | Wed Dec 30 1992 12:20 | 5 |
|
If they trade Roger, I'm going to cry. He's been more fun for me than any
other player in the league.
mike
|
29.2350 | Just wondering...:-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | No. 3 Looms over FENWAY | Wed Dec 30 1992 15:07 | 3 |
|
So will Rog be wearing # 26 on his uni this spring?
|
29.2351 | backwards for Burks | SALEM::KUPTON | Red Sox - More My Age | Wed Dec 30 1992 15:15 | 1 |
| nope....12
|
29.2352 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Wed Dec 30 1992 15:22 | 5 |
| Roger will be wearing #65. The minimum age a player has to be
before the Sox are interested in him. The Sox insurance costs should
plummet since half the team is eligible MediCare.
/Don
|
29.2353 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Liz Smith wants Madonna's body | Wed Dec 30 1992 15:23 | 3 |
| still got your sense of humor Slasher, good to see....
;^)
|
29.2354 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Mon Jan 04 1993 16:59 | 2 |
| Burks signed today with the ChiSox...
|
29.2355 | Look up in the sky !! It's Willy in the flesh. | SALEM::STIG | He died for you n' me | Mon Jan 04 1993 20:52 | 2 |
| Really?? Maybe he'll finally be the second coming of Willy Mays. The
Red Sox thought that..didn't they ???...
|