T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
18.1 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Thu Jan 03 1991 12:27 | 11 |
| Hagan had surgery on is kneecap last night, and the outlook is they
won't know for 4-6 months how well he could recover, if at all.
Meanwhile, I heard a report on the radio this morning that Charles
Johnson is giving up football. If this is true and Hagan redshirts
next year or his career is over, Vance Joseph would be the CU
quarterback for next year.
At Nebraska, I heard that Mickey Joseph may miss spring practice due to
his injury.
Joe
|
18.3 | A QB is definetely on McCartney's recruiting list. | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | Do the Bartman! | Thu Jan 03 1991 13:13 | 8 |
|
It was a ruptured patella tendon, which I would imagine is similiar
to a ruptured achillies tendon. Definetely an injury that will take
considerable rehab time.
glen j.
|
18.4 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 03 1991 16:50 | 83 |
| Only a few bright spots for Nebraska. They are:
Haase (Quarterback)
Brown (Halfback)
Mitchell (Tight End)
If Osborne starts Joseph or Grant (Heaven forbid Grant) over Haase
next year I'll be upset. Hasse can throw the ball and is a cool head,
reminds me of Gdowski. Brown is a tremendous freshman talent at
halfback and Mitchell is already awsome as a freshman. Now if they can
just build up the offensive line to where it once was. I think they
should recruite for offensive lineman rather than just rely on home
grown Nebraska boys that walk on.
The dark spots are:
Offensive line
Defense
Nebraska lost 3 out of it's last 4 games. The closest loss of those 3
was by 14 to Colorado. They had only 3 difficult opponents all season
and lost to all 3.
For several years now people have talked about how consistent Nebraska
has been. How they may not have won a national championship but they
are consistently competitive and never lacking at least a shot at
mythical number 1. They've talked about how even the great ones such
as Oklahoma, Penn State etc have had letdown years, but not Nebraska.
Well, I guess that "letdown" year has come at Nebraska. I dont think
that is anything to be ashamed of. It had to happen sooner or later.
Hey, Nebraska is not the only team to get blown out this New Years Day.
I think Nebraska will be back. Osborne will now be under EXTREME
pressure in the state of Nebraska. I think he will survive this but
if next year is the same then he could possibly be history. But you
never know. Things have a way of turning around in the wacky world
of sports.
As for Colorado? I dont think they should be number 1. And they arent
in the Coaches poll. I base this on 3 or 4 things:
Georgia Tech did beat 4 bowl teams, and they beat Nebraska much
worse than Colorado did. They were impressive.
There is no precidence whatsoever for an undefeated team NOT
getting number 1 when they are the ONLY undefeated team.
Colorado had 1 loss, 1 tie, and 1 game handed to them on an
officials blunder - the infamous 5th down. A team like CU should
have not even been in position to loose a game vs a pud team
like Mizzou. I'm sorry CU fans, but the 5th down will keep comming
up and keep comming up because the majority outside of the state
of Colorado feel that it should have bearing on who's #1.
Colrado's victory over ND was a great victory, but it was not
impressive. In fact, they were saved by the clip from sudden
defeate at the hands of Rocket.
For those reasons, I believe GT should be #1. There should be no doubt
according to past precident. But then again, when has the poll system
been consistent and logical ?????????????????
I do believe that CU is a better team than they were last year. I still
feel that they played over their heads a little last year. But this
year they were for real. If they hadent lost to Illinois, who by the
way, got blown out Jan 1, then they would have a solid claim to #1.
This was a crazy college football season and I think that this is only
starting. There is more parity than ever before. The old ratings system
will not work under these circumstances.
IT IS TIME FOR A PLAYOFF !!!
Oh well, on to basketball. My Huskers actually look pretty decent this
year. Not final 4 material but a strong team. I heard Danny Nee (Husker
hoops coach) say that their goal is to make it to the NCAA.
GO BIG RED Hoops !!!
Happy New Year to all,
Nebraska Marty
|
18.5 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 03 1991 16:51 | 10 |
| re: my own .4
I know that you CU fans will disagree. So go ahead and re: .3 ...
...GO AHEAD, MAKE MY DAY !!!
;^)
Still loyal Nebraska Marty
|
18.6 | But hey, who's counting | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Thu Jan 03 1991 17:08 | 6 |
|
Bugeater Marty,
NU lost by 15 to CU, not 14. Consider your day made!
Claybroon
|
18.7 | Undefeated not automatic ticket | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 03 1991 17:33 | 17 |
|
> There is no precidence whatsoever for an undefeated team NOT
> getting number 1 when they are the ONLY undefeated team.
I've heard this "precedence" argument a couple of times now and it's
simply untrue. In 1975, the voters in both polls recognized 11-1
Oklahoma as national champs over an undefeated and untied 12-0 Arizona
St. team from the WAC, and rightly so. The Oklahoma teams of 1973-75
lost just that one game and were one of the greatest collections of
talent of all time. In 1982, the voters in both polls recognized 11-1
Penn State as champs over 11-0-1 SWC champ SMU, and again rightly so.
There is most definitely precedence for rewarding the national
championship to a consensus "best" team, even one without the best
record in the country.
glenn
|
18.8 | "ALL YEAR LONG CU BUFFS NO#1..WE LOVE IT!!" | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Jan 03 1991 20:39 | 30 |
|
Marty, We know it's hard to take But............like it or Not
CU is NO#1 and cry cry cry over the 5th down which CU had no
control over and cry cry cry about CU beating (Can't WIN a Bowl
game CornHuskers)by 14/15 pts and all 27 points came in the 4th
Quater. CU Ended The Post Season NO#1 in Both Polls and all They
had to do was WIN and Everybody Knew It to be NO#1. But Everybody
didn't think they would WIN they thought CU would choke like last
But can you says Surprise.:-)
YES!!! THE DREAM HAS COME TRUE FOR CU...............
AND NOTHING BUT A NIGHTMARE FOR NU....McCartney accomplished what
Osborne didn't BRING HOME NO#1. You'll have to live with that ALL YEAR LONG.
So Go ahead and Cry.........Oh Yes and I do give Credit to GT for great
Season and if they would have Been rated NO#1 at the end of the
Season and beat a ND team(any team) by 1 point I would have gave it to them.
But they didn't....So! :-)
And you of all people should want to see the BIG 8 WIN IT ALL
Shame Shame Shame.:-)
One More Thing I Just Like to Dedicate this NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP
TITLE to all the Coaches and Players in The BIG 8 Conference.
" ALL YEAR LONG CU BUFFS NO#1...WE LOVE IT!!! "
" THE DREWSKI "
|
18.9 | More argument fun... | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 03 1991 21:48 | 77 |
| re: .8
> Marty, We know it's hard to take But............like it or Not
> CU is NO#1 and cry cry cry over the 5th down which CU had no
> control over and cry cry cry about CU beating (Can't WIN a Bowl
> game CornHuskers)by 14/15 pts and all 27 points came in the 4th
> Quater. CU Ended The Post Season NO#1 in Both Polls and all They
> had to do was WIN and Everybody Knew It to be NO#1. But Everybody
> didn't think they would WIN they thought CU would choke like last
> But can you says Surprise.:-)
Gee do ya maybee thunk that if ya slowed down and did yer wright'n
with yer brain instead of rattl'n off a bunch of slur that just maybee
us other noters might find yur note maybee just a little more readable?
Correction, Cu is #1 in one of the 2 polls, and the one they are ranked
2nd in is the coaches poll.
NU does suck in bowls lately. No doubt. I think that most NU fans have
come to grips by now that this (and last years) Huskers are not what they
used to be. Us NU fans have nothing to cry about this year. NU is not
a top-10 quality team. It's just that simple.
> One More Thing I Just Like to Dedicate this NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP
> TITLE to all the Coaches and Players in The BIG 8 Conference.
I'm in awe of your self granted authority.
> " ALL YEAR LONG CU BUFFS NO#1...WE LOVE IT!!! "
Yes, they are #1 all year long now...
...both them and Georgia Tech.
It's * EXTREMELY * hard to stay on top. Especially when you share that
top spot.
re: .7
glenn, you make a very good argument. I stand corrected about the
precident thing.
* However *
the coaches in the UPI poll disagree with the logic you present so
there must be some difference between those years and this year.
Perhaps that difference is that CU does have a loss * AND * a tie.
Plus the 5th down thing does hurt CU. Like it or not. Every national
discussion (ESPN, CBS, etc) that I have seen on TV brings it up as
soon as CU is mentioned. It's just a fact and it is hurting CU.
The fact that it's not CU's fault (and it isent) is not the issue.
The issue is that they most likely would have lost to a vastly
inferior team if not for the gift. I personally would have a hard
time voting a team in that position #1 when they have a loss AND
a tie with it.
re: .6
> Bugeater Marty,
Bugeaters, yes there it is. Please note here that is was * NOT * a
Nebraska fan that started slinging mud via names. Besides, I think the
"Bugeaters" thing is funny. It's also aplicable this year. ;^)
Are you now giving me license to call CU the "5th downers", the
"Colorado Clippers" the "turf whiners" etc ???
> NU lost by 15 to CU, not 14. Consider your day made!
I dont claim to be a math wizzard, but last time I subtracted 13 from
27 it came out to be 14. Not that it realy makes any big difference.
Yes, you just made my day.
Huskers will be back. Maybee next year, maybee not. But they * WILL *
be back !!! Remember my words.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.10 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Fri Jan 04 1991 10:26 | 18 |
| The final score of the CU-NU game was 27-12.
RE: Coaches poll
This year's AP vote was the fifth closest in history. The 2nd
closest vote in history was last year, with Miami edging ND. However,
last year's UPI poll also gave Miami the top spot, so this year's
coaches poll displays another form of inconsistency. But the biggest
fallacy of it IMO remains the fact that the coaches gave CU a 38-7
advantage in first-place votes in the final regular season poll, yet
swayed considerably after New Year's Day. AP only swayed slightly.
There is a report that CU and GT may meet in the Kickoff Classic in the
Meadowlands, but it is very premature. If it were to come about, I'm
sure Tech would be the favorite, because it sounds like they have a lot
of starters returning, while CU will be losing 13 starters, including 3
All-Americans.
Joe
|
18.11 | | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Fri Jan 04 1991 10:37 | 12 |
|
I ask your forgiveness Marty. I didn't realize NU fans
were offended by the name "Bugeater". Wasn't that a
common nickname for NU? No mudslingin' intended.......
Call CU whatever you want.........NATIONAL CHAMPS WOULD
BE NICE!
And, yes, 13 from 27 is 14..................if that were
the score ;^)
Cl;aybroon
|
18.12 | 1991 CU football schedule | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:27 | 17 |
| After playing one of the toughest schedules in the country in 1990, CU's
schedule for 1991 is much easier. However, they'll need it as they will
lose all of their star player's to graduation and injuries(Hagan).
Sep 7 Wyoming
Sep 14 Baylor
Sep 21 Minnesota
Sep 28 at Standford
Oct 12 Missouri
Oct 19 at Oklahoma
Oct 26 at Kansas State
Nov 2 Nebraska
Nov 9 at Oklahoma State
Nov 16 Kansas
Nov 23 at Iowa State
Keith
|
18.13 | Nebraska football schedules (For VT terminals) | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:50 | 85 |
| [H[J
Future Nebraska Football Schedules
#3 1991
#4 1991
Sep. 7 Utah State - HOME
14 Colorado State
21 Washington - HOME
28 Arizona State
Oct. 12 Oklahoma State
19 Kansas State - HOME
26 Missouri
Nov. 2 Colorado
9 Kansas - HOME
16 Iowa State
23 Oklahoma - HOME
#3 1992
#4 1992
Sep. 5 Utah - HOME
12 Temple - HOME
19 Washington
26 Arizona State - HOME
Oct. 10 Oklahoma State - HOME
17 Kansas State
24 Missouri - HOME
31 Colorado - HOME
Nov. 7 Kansas
14 Iowa State - HOME
21 Oklahoma
#3 1993
#4 1993
Sep. 4 Wyoming - HOME
11 Texas Tech - HOME
18 UCLA
25 Colorado State - HOME
Oct. 9 Oklahoma State
16 Kansas State - HOME
23 Missouri
30 Colorado
Nov. 6 Kansas - HOME
13 Iowa State
20 Oklahoma - HOME
#3 1994
#4 1994
Sep. 3 Wyoming - HOME
10 Texas Tech
17 UCLA - HOME
24 Utah State - HOME
Oct. 8 Oklahoma State - HOME
15 Kansas State
22 Missouri - HOME
29 Colorado - HOME
Nov. 5 Kansas
12 Iowa State - HOME
19 Oklahoma
#3 1995*
#4 1995*
Sep. 9 Michigan State
16 Arizona State - HOME
23 Utah State - HOME
30 Washington State - HOME
#3 1996*
#4 1996*
Sep. 7 Nevasa-Las Vegas - HOME
14 Michigan State - HOME
21 Arizona State
28 Colorado State - HOME
* 1995 and 1996 Big Eight Schedules still to be determined
|
18.14 | Sorry Nebraska Marty - I couldn't resist! | WORDY::NAZZARO | A Johnny Most fan for 30 years | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:51 | 5 |
| Re. -1:
You sure that's not Nebraska's schedule??? ;-)
NAZZ
|
18.15 | Huskers have tuff'r one next year... | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:52 | 5 |
| Looks like CU will have to put up with what NU had the last 2 years.
Criticism about schedule.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.16 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:53 | 7 |
| re: .14
Ohhhhhhhh, low blow Nazz. Low blow. But that's ok, I know it's in jest.
Go Celtics !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.17 | MORE FUN!!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Jan 04 1991 15:28 | 10 |
|
" CU BUFFS NO#1 AND 2 TIME BIG 8 CHAMPS "
WE LOVE IT !!!! HEY!
" THE DREWSKI "
|
18.19 | Hav'n Fun!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Jan 04 1991 15:56 | 10 |
|
Hawk, it doesn't matter NO#1 is NO#1. :-)
p.s. I'm just jaw'n/ kid'n, having fun..I'm sure you would too.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
18.20 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Jan 04 1991 16:51 | 17 |
| Sep 7 Wyoming Geographic incentive for Cowboys
Sep 14 Baylor Could be tough -
Sep 21 Minnesota Ditto
Sep 28 at Standford Watch for the Upset
Oct 12 Missouri Tigers make up for '90 Screw
Oct 19 at Oklahoma Sooners rool in Norman
Oct 26 at Kansas State Big 8 Pushover
Nov 2 Nebraska Ditto
Nov 9 at Oklahoma State Ditto
Nov 16 Kansas Ditto
Nov 23 at Iowa State Cyclones tough at home
If I hear anyone rave about CU's tough schedule next year, I'll puke.
Rich
|
18.21 | | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Jan 04 1991 17:01 | 12 |
|
Who gives the right for the Schools to Print out "National champions"
items ?
Does GT have to have UPI CHAMPS on there's and CU AP CHAMPS?
I would like to get a matching set.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
18.22 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | C.U. 1990 National Champions!! | Fri Jan 04 1991 18:01 | 3 |
| >If I hear anyone rave about CU's tough schedule next year, I'll puke.
Hey they gotta play at K-state.
|
18.23 | | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Mon Jan 07 1991 10:39 | 7 |
|
I read an article in the paper that said CU's schedule will
be *light* next year, but not in the next few years after
that. I can't recall all of the teams mentioned. I do
remember the article said that they'll play Miami and Michigan.
Claybroon
|
18.24 | Joy over Buffs Ntl Championship | DENVER::HITE | Bart Simpson killed Laura Palmer | Wed Jan 09 1991 18:24 | 29 |
| I am glad I finally found this conference. I have had all this pent-up
joy and excitement over CU's victory over Notre Dame and their National
Championship!
I went to the pep rally for the team and coach the day after the Orange
Bowl. It was wonderful sitting there with 8,000 other loyal Buff fans.
We quietly sat there for about an hour and a half, but when the coach
and the team walked in, you couldn't even hear yourself think with all
the cheering!
It is unfortunate that there is a controversy over who is Number 1. As
far as I am concerned, this is a dream come true. Back to Back Big 8
champs, the winningest record over the last two years of any team in
the country, and National Champs to boot!
I am a bit disappointed in our husker colleagues. Where, o where is
their conference loyalty. I remember the days when Big Red was a
national contender--Devaney lobbied the Big 8 teams for their votes,
expounding the virtues of conference loyalty. But now when the tables
are turned . . . . . . .
But again, I am thrilled. I only wish my Dad could be alive to see
this.
FYI: there is a ticker tape parade in Boulder on Jan. 19 for the
Buffs. Hope to you a lot of you there!
Regards,
Jan
|
18.25 | Done! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Comin'on strong in'91 | Wed Jan 09 1991 18:50 | 7 |
| .24� FYI: there is a ticker tape parade in Boulder on Jan. 19 for the
.24� Buffs. Hope to you a lot of you there!
Ga.Tech has already had their ticker tape parade! I guess there
will be two this year...
B.A.
|
18.26 | had to take a walk? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu Jan 10 1991 09:14 | 6 |
| Meanwhile, at the NCAA convention, Bill McCartney walked out as they were
about to honor Bobby Ross for the coach's poll No. 1. McCartney claims he
had to go to the bathroom. To his credit, McCartney said he was
"embarassed" and made it back into the room for the presentation.
TTom
|
18.27 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Al Haig, Baby Doc, Mr. T | Thu Jan 10 1991 10:43 | 4 |
| Since GT had their parade first, it's obvious that they are the true
National Champs.
Bruce
|
18.28 | | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:50 | 5 |
|
No way Brucester, CU was voted #1 first so they are the true
nat'l champs. ;^)
Claybroon
|
18.29 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:52 | 4 |
| 2 National champs. Just more evidence of a desperate need for a
playoff.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.30 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:53 | 6 |
| Well, my Huskers footbal team was a dissapointment. But hey, how bout
them Husker cagers !!!
Go Big Red
Nebraska Marty
|
18.31 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | INeedAVacationFromMyVacation | Thu Jan 10 1991 11:55 | 4 |
| >>But hey, how bout them Husker cagers !
Nebrask got football players doing drugs and beating people up too? 8^)
|
18.33 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Thu Jan 10 1991 12:54 | 9 |
| Not only is NU hoops a big surprise, but CU is doing well under
first-year coach Joe Harrington. The Buffs and Huskers were picked 7th
and 8th in the conference in a preseason writers' poll. CU won at Wake
Forest last night and is now 10-3, 1-0 in the Big-8. But I would
expect the Buffs to hit reality when they play Saturday at Oklahoma.
Vitale was even giving CU and Harrington some good publicity late in
the GT-Duke game last night.
Joe
|
18.34 | GT is #1 | MPO::GILBERT | Pats in '91 - Showin' the fire | Thu Jan 10 1991 13:43 | 5 |
|
Watch for GT coach Bobby Ross to be named head coach of the Cleveland
Browns this week. Is anybody even asking the CU guy about another
job?
|
18.35 | | COMET1::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Thu Jan 10 1991 14:44 | 11 |
|
I admit, ya got me stumped Hawk ;^) Let's see. CU's plane
arrived home before GT's? Oh, never mind........
I haven't heard any rumors about McCartney moving on. They
gave him something like a 15 year contract lasted year. I
kinda doubt he'd make a good pro coach. He's a real "mom
and apple pie" type of guy that I don't think pro athletes
care for.
Claybroon
|
18.36 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Thu Jan 10 1991 16:20 | 25 |
|
> I haven't heard any rumors about McCartney moving on. They
> gave him something like a 15 year contract lasted year. I
> kinda doubt he'd make a good pro coach.
I would be extremely surprised if McCartney even considered other
offers at this point, and I agree that he just doesn't seem like he'd
be a good pro coach. If he was going anywhere, he'd already be gone.
About 3 years ago, he was only a sliver away from taking the SMU job,
but shocked everyone and stayed here at CU. The key point in
McCartney's career was when he was given a contract extension in the
middle of a 1-10, 1984 season.
When he first came here in 1981, his goal was to compete with OU and
NU for the conference title, but he said it would take about 7 years
to get to that level. He has reached that goal and doesn't really have
much more to conquer at CU, but I think he really wants to stay at CU
and try to keep them among the nation's elite. Plus he does have the
15-year contract as previously mentioned, although that doesn't
necessarily mean anything.
I think this has been McCartney's only head-coaching position. Before
coming to CU, he was an assistant to Bo at Michigan.
Joe
|
18.37 | The Battle Has Only Just Begun... | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 10 1991 17:41 | 15 |
| re: .36
> ... He has reached that goal and doesn't really have
> much more to conquer at CU, but I think he really wants to stay at CU
> and try to keep them among the nation's elite.
Joe, I think that trying to keep it up among the "elite" after losing 13
starters and BOTH QB's is quite a lot to conquer. He's been "up there"
for 2 seasons in a row but now that he's loosing some of the athletes
that got him "up there" he has to keep it "up there" with a new crop of
kids. That's a challenge.
Huskers hoops ranked 18th (???) with only 2 loss. GO BIG RED !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.38 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Thu Jan 10 1991 17:43 | 5 |
| re: .37
Oops, a typo. That only 1 loss for the Big Red Hoopsters.
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.39 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Thu Jan 10 1991 17:57 | 21 |
|
> Joe, I think that trying to keep it up among the "elite" after losing 13
> starters and BOTH QB's is quite a lot to conquer. He's been "up there"
> for 2 seasons in a row but now that he's loosing some of the athletes
> that got him "up there" he has to keep it "up there" with a new crop of
> kids. That's a challenge.
Yes, it's definitely going to be tough, especially this coming season.
OU proved they're back this year, and there's no doubt in my mind that
NU will be back at or near the top of the Big-8 next year.
I don't know much about CU's new starters for next year, but with CU's
recruiting success in the last 5 or 6 years tells me that there should
be some good players ready to step in. But the fact does remain that
the Buffs are losing some of the nation's best talent. Neither Hagan
nor Johnson is definitely out for next season, but even if neither ends
up playing, I think Vance Joseph has some good potential. With their
soft preseason schedule, the new Buff starters will have a chance to
get some experience and confidence for the conference schedule.
Joe
|
18.40 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:10 | 3 |
| Anybody have the early Big-8 Hoops standings?
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.41 | Big 8 Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:23 | 13 |
| Conf. Overall
Nebraska 2-0 16-1
Oklahoma 2-0 13-2
Missouri 2-0 9-4
Oklahoma St 1-1 11-3
Colorado 1-1 10-4
Kansas 0-2 9-4
Kansas St 0-2 8-5
Iowa St 0-2 5-12
|
18.42 | Can it last? | SHALOT::MEDVID | President Gas | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:44 | 5 |
| Danny Nee is for real, Husker fans!
When does Nebraska play Oklahoma and Missouri?
--dan'l
|
18.43 | Go Big Red | BSS::M_HENDERSON | Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!! | Wed Jan 16 1991 10:30 | 35 |
| Taken from todays U.S.A. Today without permission:
Nebraska: Not just football
Call this the obituary of that fond sporting phrase, "Oh that's a
football school."
Nebraska has a mens basketball team.
The Huskers, tabbed to finish last in the Big Eight, are the seasons
suprise. They are 16-1 against a non-too-shabby shedule, with a school-
record 14-game winning streak.
Coach Danny Nee, though, isen't ready to anoint his former sinner,
saints. "We're not over the hump yet," he says.
Nee is gazing at a 3 game stretch, starting next Tuesday that features
games at Colorado and Oklahoma and a home test against Missouri."Then,"
he says "we'll know alot more about ourselves."
The Huskers bring unacustomed weapons to this party: five double-figure
scored led by 6-8 Carl Hayes at 15.8 points a game and 7-2 Rich King at
13-8; a defense that limits opponents to 41% field goal shooting; and a
bench that goes four deep.
But mostly what the Huskers have "is experience and maturiey," Nee
says. "We took our lumps, and now it is paying off."
Nee was 63-64 coming into the season and says there were times he
diden't think Nebraska could get it turned around.
"This is fun," he says. "There just isen't any time to enjoy it."
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.44 | Mizzou 80, OU 72 | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Wed Jan 16 1991 11:12 | 7 |
| Missouri beat Oklahoma in Columbia last night to take sole possesion of
first place in the conference. The big story was Stewart and Tubbs
exchanging words after the game. I saw the clips and they were really
going at it. Should be interesting when they meet in Norman later in
the season.
Joe
|
18.45 | He's got good roots | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Wed Jan 16 1991 13:02 | 7 |
| Yo HHH,
Wasn't Danny Nee an assistant coach under Trigger Smelts (tm) at
ND in his past life?
MikeL
|
18.46 | The Danny Nee bio | KUDZU::MEDVID | President Gas | Wed Jan 16 1991 13:41 | 27 |
| From what I recall, Nee was a prep star and good friend of Lou
Alcindor. He went on to be a Digger asst, spent some time coaching at
a small college in Kentucky I think, and then became head coach at Ohio
University while I was there.
He turned the Bobcats around in one year. They went from a 6-win team
to conference champs. Of the four years I was at OU, Nee won the
MAC twice and took the team to the NCAAs three years straight.
The Bobcats have not recovered since his departure five years ago.
During his first year at Nebraska, he took the team he inherited to the
NIT final...with Dave Hoppen as the star center.
He's been rebuilding ever since and finally things are falling into
place. Danny Nee is a real nice fellow with a great sense of humor.
He knows the game well and is able to get the most out of his players
with very little annimation or yelling.
If he would have spent one more year at Ohio U, it's everbody's guess
that he would have moved on up to Columbus when Ohio State was
searching for a replacement. And it was rumored Ohio State wanted him
badly and was disappointed he went to Nebraska earlier that year even
before they could talk to him. But it doesn't look like OSU is
suffering too much now that they're on track with their second coach
since then.
--dan'l
|
18.47 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Wed Jan 23 1991 10:52 | 21 |
| CU beat 14th-ranked Nebraska in Boulder last night 86-69. NU led 45-44
at halftime, and both teams shot under 40% for the game. CU plays at
Kansas on Saturday and NU plays at Oklahoma on Saturday.
#13 Oklahoma lost to Southwestern Louisiana 103-101 in Norman last
night.
Here's the current Big 8 standings:
Conf. Overall
Oklahoma 3-1 14-4
Missouri 3-1 11-5
Nebraska 2-1 16-2
Colorado 2-1 12-4
Kansas 1-2 11-4
Oklahoma St 1-2 11-4
Iowa St 1-2 7-12
Kansas St 0-3 10-6
Joe
|
18.48 | Buffs buff Huskers | SHALOT::MEDVID | the plans for a future war | Wed Jan 23 1991 10:54 | 22 |
| Nebraska took its second loss of the season last night in Boulder,
86-69...on national TV no less. But it was good to see Danny Nee in
the spotlight.
A few points:
- Never once saw any Nebraska player talk to an official. The
same was true when Nee coached Ohio U. The players were
never allowed to say a word to an official or question a
call. If they did, Nee sat them down. I assumed, however,
that that was a MAC rule. Guess it's a Nee rule.
- Colorado has a player named...correct me if I'm wrong...
House Guest.
- Nebraska has some big boys. Might have three NBA
centers/forwards on that team...hope they're better than
Dave Hoppen.
Later.
--dan'l
|
18.49 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Wed Jan 23 1991 11:23 | 7 |
|
> - Colorado has a player named...correct me if I'm wrong...
> House Guest.
His real name is Rodell Guest. "House" Guest is his nickname.
Joe
|
18.50 | Danny Nee fan club checking in | SHALOT::MEDVID | Nature must still find a way | Mon Jan 28 1991 09:29 | 5 |
| Nebraska beat Oklahoma Saturday, 111-99. Danny Nee and the Huskers
rebound from crushing defeat in Boulder. Would have loved to have see
Tubbs squirming on the sideline of this one. Missouri is next I think.
--dan'l
|
18.51 | Huskers have a decent BBall team - Yeaaaa !!! | BSS::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Tue Jan 29 1991 17:44 | 26 |
| re. -1
The Mizzou at Husker (I think it's at the Devaney Center) game
Wednesday night is on the cable channel "Prime Sports Network."
The win over the Okie's was AT Oklahoma. Sweet!!! I cant wait to get
Colorado at the Devaney Center in Lincoln. The Buffalo hoopsters must
have played a tremendous game the other night vs Nebraska.
I heard the Danny Nee show last night on the radio (KFAB AM 1110 Omaha
can be picked up at night on the Colorado front range) and he said that
he was very confident even in the early part of the game about a win
over Oklahoma. He also said that he KNEW Nebraska had Oklahoma rattled
early in the second half when Tubbs went to a zone defense. Okie's don't
do that much.
Nee also said that himself, the team, and the Nebraska media is/was
treated VERY well by the Oklahoma fans and staff. Absolutely NOTHING
was said about how they were treated at Colorado. Read between the
lines if you wish, there may or may not be anything there.
Nebraska, despite the loss at CU moves from #14 to #11.
Go Big Red Husker Hoops,
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.52 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Tue Jan 29 1991 19:21 | 17 |
| I was just ready to call Nebrasaka over-rated, then they go into Norman
and beat the Sooners convincingly. I still feel they will lose a few
when they go on the road in the conference, although they already have
the W in Norman under their belt. The Big-8 is very well-balanced this
year, but I don't see any legitimate top-10 teams in the conference.
NU is obviously the biggest surprise of the season, but CU is doing
well also. However, the Buffs' road losing streak in conference games
is still going and is at something like 54 right now. And after their
big win against NU the other night, they proceed to go into Lawrence and
get blown out by more than 30. If CU is to have a shot at the big dance,
it goes without saying they'll have to win a few conference games on the
road. And it could very well come down to how well the Buffs perform
in the Big 8 tournament. As for NU, they will be in the tourney barring
a total collapse.
Joe
|
18.53 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Wed Jan 30 1991 12:55 | 11 |
|
> The Mizzou at Husker (I think it's at the Devaney Center) game
> Wednesday night is on the cable channel "Prime Sports Network."
Yea, the game is at Nebraska, and it's at 6:30. I'm glad we finally
got that PSN here in the Springs. It'll be nice come football season,
because they carry Big 8 football games also.
Oklahoma State plays at Boulder tonight. The Cowboys have quietly
played their way to a 13-4 record, so this appears to be a good matchup
on paper. No TV though.
|
18.54 | | BSS::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Wed Jan 30 1991 23:47 | 51 |
| Wednesday Jan 30th Big-8 hoops
Huskers over Mizzou
Iowa State over Oklahoma
Thats all I've heard so far tonight.
I saw Nebraska for the first time this year on Prime Sports Cable
Network. The Huskers do look like they are for real !!!
The strengths of this team are:
Depth - They go 9 deep
Good athletic ability
Good team play on both ends of the court - no 1 player is a superstar
but they have several quality players
Good coaching
Poise
Excellent 3 point team - 5 or 6 guys can hit the 3 consistently
The thing I like about a Danny Nee team is that they never complain
to the refs (The players that is). It's a Nee policy. I like that,
it shows good character, is a good example to the kids, and it makes
the game more pleasent to watch.
Mizzou came out playing a zone. Norm S. dosent do that much. I think
he thought he was out-manned. Especially with one of his best players
out.
The zone worked for a while untill the Husker Hoopsters started hitting
from outside. Huskers lead was comforable most of the game. Nebraska
also played zone for most of the game, Mizzou is not a real good
outside shooting team.
The Huskers Beau Reid is a pro prospect. 6-8 forward with good range.
Nebraska's home-grown 7-2 center form Omaha (cant recall his name right
now) is what NBA'ers would call "a project." He does have good
coordination, but not good quickness. He's a "good" college center.
An OK NBA backup center at best. Maybee he will get better with age.
Nebraska's bench scored something like 35 points. This is a major key
to this club.
NU fans were really into the game. Many chants of "Sit Down Norm" etc.
As a native Nebraskan it's great to see good Husker basketball,
especially then the football team has been taking it's lumps lately.
;^)
Go Big Red, Okie State on Saturday !!!
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.55 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Thu Jan 31 1991 09:55 | 5 |
| The Buffs blew a win last night against OSU, losing 76-66. CU led
60-51 with 6 minutes left, but OSU went on a 21-0 run at that point.
Looks like the Buffs are headed for the NIT.
Joe
|
18.56 | Still early in the conference...
| CSC32::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Fri Feb 01 1991 15:27 | 3 |
| Does anyone have the current Big-8 Hoops standing?
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.57 | Big 8 Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Fri Feb 01 1991 16:23 | 23 |
| Conf. Overall
Colorado 7-0 11-1-1
Oklahoma 5-2 8-3
Nebraska 5-2 9-2
Whoops....I lost my train of thought...
Those are the Big 8 football standings! :^)
Okay, here's the current basketball standings
Conf. Overall
Nebraska 4-1 18-2
Missouri 4-2 12-6
Kansas 3-2 14-4
Oklahoma St 3-2 14-4
Oklahoma 3-3 14-6
Colorado 2-3 12-6
Iowa St 2-3 8-13
Kansas St 0-5 10-8
Joe
|
18.58 | Dident help Huskers cause any... | CSC32::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Mon Feb 04 1991 11:18 | 4 |
| Huskers lost at home vs Okie State Saturday. Daggummit !!! Cant be loosing
those home games. Now have 2 conference losses. ;^(
Husker Hoops Hendersone
|
18.59 | another RB at O State? | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Tue Feb 05 1991 00:52 | 17 |
| ....and back to BIG-8 Football......
from the Denver Post:
Oklahoma State received a commitment from that state's top tailback,
Raphael Denson. The 5-8, 175-pounder gained more than 2,000 yards.
One publication compared him to former OU halfback Joe Washington.
Denson, however, wants to be compared to Oklahoma State's tailback
dynasty of Thurman Thomas, Barry Sanders and 1990 NCAA rushing champ
Gerald Hudson. Denson picked the Cowboys over the Sooners for a
chance to play immediately.
OSU's new bball coach, Eddie Sutton, seems to be doing all the right
things so far. Not bad for his first year!
Cowboy
|
18.60 | There's been a drought in Norman since Billy Sims, really... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 05 1991 10:49 | 11 |
|
> Denson picked the Cowboys over the Sooners for a
> chance to play immediately.
I don't know why he thinks this. The Sooners have been hurting for a
great tailback since Marcus Dupree hit the road, while State cleaned
up in the 80's. I didn't see anybody distinguish himself on the
Sooners last year, either...
glenn
|
18.61 | I LIKE HIS THINKING.... | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Tue Feb 05 1991 11:28 | 9 |
| glenn, I took it as saying that Denson has a good shot at stepping
in as a starter only because Gerald Hudson has left. I don't
remember who's still at OU but (IMO) OSU is hard to beat for a
talented RB to get exposure, with their type of offense and
RB history. A RB doesn't have to share the glory as they do
with the multiple backs at OU.
Cowboy
|
18.62 | Buff season getting worse | BSS::JCOTANCH | Orange to whip Irish this Saturday | Thu Feb 07 1991 10:20 | 10 |
| The Buffs lost in OT last night to Missouri, 75-67. CU has now lost 4
in a row with their last win being the win over Nebraska a couple of
weeks ago.
Also last night:
Kansas beat Nebraska 85-77.
OSU beat Iowa St. 83-62.
Joe
|
18.63 | | CSC32::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | Celtics Pride | Thu Feb 07 1991 10:51 | 14 |
| I heard the last 10 min of the Ne/Kansas game on the radio last night. It
sounded like KU was out-hustling Nebraska on defense a little. It's hard
to judge though without seeing.
Bau Reid was in foul trouble most of the game for Nebraska. This was a factor.
Also the KU crowd was really into the game.
This is gonna be some year for Big-8 conference basketball. There is amazing
balance top to bottom. I guess that the conference champ will have at least
4 conference losses.
Go Big Red !!
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.64 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Orange to whip Irish this Saturday | Thu Feb 07 1991 11:03 | 13 |
|
> This is gonna be some year for Big-8 conference basketball. There is amazing
> balance top to bottom. I guess that the conference champ will have at least
> 4 conference losses.
It's definitely an interesting year in the conference. There's no
legitimate top-10 teams in the Big 8, but 4 teams are currently ranked.
NU, OU, OSU, and KU should make the tourney, and Mizzou would make it
in also if they weren't on probation. And as far as the conference
tournament goes, at this point I wouldn't be surprised to see *any* of
the 8 teams win it.
Joe
|
18.65 | At least the coach can laugh about it. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Air Force, CSU, CU... Denver Bronco's | Thu Feb 07 1991 15:58 | 8 |
| I was listening to the Radio show last night will Bill McCartney gushing
over his now Letter of intent sighed prospects. They brought up to him that
is was a close game with Missouri at the half.
McCartney replied that maybe they should water down the event center floor
and hope that the Tigers didn't bring a different set of shoes...
|
18.66 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Feb 11 1991 09:24 | 5 |
| Did anyone catch the OSU/Georgia baseball score last weekend.
Apparently, the local sports reporters did know that the season
has already started and I can't find the score.
Cowboy
|
18.67 | time to change the p-name! | COMET::WADE | wake me when it's baseball season..... | Mon Feb 11 1991 10:21 | 9 |
|
Cowboy,
OSU won and I *think* the final was 3-2. OSU then got pounded
in the champeenship(tm) game by LSU. I turned off the tube
before it was over but it was something like 5 or 6 to nothing
in favor of the Tigers in about the 7th inning.
Claybroon
|
18.68 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Feb 11 1991 12:06 | 5 |
| re: p-name
You're right about that, but I've been kinda waiting to see if they
would three-peat (sorry) in wrestling. Anyone know about that?
|
18.69 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Feb 11 1991 12:20 | 3 |
| Wrestling tournament isn't until next month.
John
|
18.70 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Feb 12 1991 12:56 | 22 |
| Big 8 Standings as of 2/12:
Conf. All
Kansas 6-2 17-4
Nebraska 5-3 19-4
Oklahoma St. 5-3 16-5
Missouri 5-3 13-7
Oklahoma 4-4 15-8
Iowa St. 3-5 9-15
Colorado 2-5 12-9
Kansas St. 2-5 12-9
Kansas and Nebraska will make the tourney, and barring total collapses
OSU and OU will make it also. I would say the Buffs still have a
decent shot of making the NIT. Mizzou is on probation.
CU plays host to KSU Wednesday night and plays at ISU on Saturday,
which will be their best remaining hope of breaking their conference
road-losing streak.
Joe
|
18.71 | Hoops schedules? | CX3PST::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Wed Feb 13 1991 14:04 | 4 |
| Does anyone have the Big-8 basketball schedule? Or at least the Nebraska
basketball schedule? It would be nice to have this posted in here.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.72 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Feb 13 1991 18:18 | 4 |
| Don't have NU's schedule, but I know they play at Iowa State tonight.
The Buffs play host to Kansas State tonight. (CU *should* win this one)
Joe
|
18.73 | Remaining Husker Games | SHALOT::MEDVID | to discover war is not the answer | Wed Feb 13 1991 21:38 | 8 |
| 2/13 - @ Iowa State
2/16 - OU
2/18 - N. Illinois
2/20 - @ Missouri
2/23 - KSU
2/27 - @ OSU
3/3 - Kansas
|
18.74 | Buffs win!! (finally) | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Feb 14 1991 11:03 | 9 |
| The Nebraska-Oklahoma game is on PSN this Saturday night at 7pm. (MST)
Last night's scores:
Colorado 85, K-State 71
OSU 77, Oklahoma 74
Nebraska 65, ISU 57
Joe
|
18.75 | Pete belongs to us!! | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Wed Feb 20 1991 09:08 | 9 |
| OSU and Wyoming are fighting over the rights to use the "Pistol Pete"
logo and name. According to old records OSU started printing the
logo on stationery way back in 1930 while UW started using it in 1966.
UW recently filed claim to it--just a few days before OSU did but OSU
already got their rights approved.
Hey, Wyoming, get yur own logo
Cowboy
|
18.76 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:04 | 12 |
| CU trainer Dave Burton said he is optimistic that Hagan will be ready
to play this fall. Hagan will miss spring practice.
RE: logo
I thought Wyoming's logo is the Cowboy riding the bucking horse, and
OSU's is the Cowboy just standing there.
In basketball, the Buffs are on PSN at 7 tonight against 8th-ranked
Kansas.
Joe
|
18.77 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:23 | 16 |
| > RE: logo
> I thought Wyoming's logo is the Cowboy riding the bucking horse, and
> OSU's is the Cowboy just standing there.
That's the ones I've usually seen although one Football mag did have
them reversed once. Apparently UW also calls theirs Pistol Pete too.
re: CU/KU
Is the game in Boulder? I'd love to see CU knock KU outa 1st place
and give OSU a shot of winning the Big8. Anything can (and has)
happen this year in bball. I can't remember a better year for the
conference as far as the over-all competition between the B8 teams.
Cowboy
|
18.78 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Feb 20 1991 18:09 | 9 |
| KU-CU game is in Boulder.
I read a small article in The Denver Post this morning about the
Wyo-OSU mascot debate. Wyoming's official mascot is the bucking horse,
but they just use Pistol Pete on the side. If OSU wins the case,
Wyoming will either have to stop using Pistol Pete or start paying OSU
for the rights.
Joe
|
18.79 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Feb 21 1991 10:05 | 29 |
| Big win for the Buffs last night! KU came back to tie the game after
trailing by 14 at halftime, but CU held on for a 79-71 victory. An
NCAA berth is suddenly a possibility again. The Buffs' remaining games
are at OSU and at Mizzou, and at home against Oklahoma. I figure if
they can win 2 of those 3 and win at least 1 game in the conference
tourney, they Buffs have a good shot at making the big dance. Winning
2 of those 3 certainly won't be easy, though. Even if they do what I
just said, it's still iffy. It may take 2 wins in the confernce tourney,
or maybe even winning their remaining 3 regular season games. And if
CU doesn't make the NCAA's, an NIT bid is almost in the bag. (Big
deal, though)
In other Big 8 games last night, Oklahoma lost their 5th straight game,
falling to ISU 97-88, and Mizzou whipped Nebraska 91-71.
Conference standings:
Conf. All
Kansas 8-3 19-5
OSU 8-3 19-5
Nebraska 7-4 22-5
Missouri 6-5 14-9
Colorado 5-6 15-9
Oklahoma 4-7 15-11
ISU 4-7 10-17
KSU 2-9 12-12
Joe
|
18.80 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Feb 25 1991 12:35 | 19 |
| CU lost an important game to OSU yesterday 79-67. The Buffs trailed by
13 at halftime, but later closed to within 2 before OSU pulled away for
good. Shaun Vandiver got his 3rd foul with about 8 minutes left in the
1st half. Forward Byron Houston sure looked good for OSU.
OSU is now tied for the conference lead with Kansas, 1 game ahead of
Nebraska. As for CU, they are now 15-10 on the season. If they split
their last 2 games (which is the most likely scenario), the Buffs would
need at least 1 win in the conference tourney IMO to have a decent shot
at an NCAA bid. If they could win their last 2 *and* win 1 game in the
conf. tourney, then CU would make it IMO. If the NCAA takes 4 Big 8
teams, CU would probably go before OU because the Sooners are on a
serious tailspin at this point.
CU's remaining games are against OU in Boulder on Wednesday and at
Mizzou on Saturday afternoon.
Joe
|
18.81 | | CX3PST::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Thu Feb 28 1991 11:42 | 5 |
| Huskers loose AT Okie State. The final score was not typical of the game. CU
blew a big lead over Oklahoma at CU to loose.
Looks like Nebraska will probably settle for 3rd in the Big-8, BUT it still
looks like they are a shoe-in for the "Big Dance" in March.
|
18.82 | Goodbye NCAA's, hello NIT :( | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Feb 28 1991 12:53 | 7 |
| As Marty mentioned, CU blew a big lead (18 points at one time) at home
and lost to OU, 69-68. CU is 15-11 overall, but only 5-8 in the
conference. Their only regular season game left is at Missouri on
Saturday. In all likelihood, the only way CU will make the NCAA's is
to win the Big 8 tourney.
Joe
|
18.83 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Thu Feb 28 1991 16:05 | 20 |
| I was able to listen to the Nebraska/Okla.St game on the radio and
it definitely was a real fight the whole game. Wasn't it a Cornhusker
that got his nose broken in the first half? After getting it set
during halftime he came back and scored several more points. OSU's
Byron Houston fouled out with about 5 minutes to go and when Nebraska
was getting it close. That's when it got tense because Houston's
good at the line. OSU was forced to play their 7 footer, Pittman,
who was something like 1 for 8 at the line. As long as Nebraska
couldn't foul him it would be ok but it started to look like UN might
slip ahead.
Eddie Sutton is due some recognition for his first season. He will
be the 1st coach to take 4 different teams to the NCAA tourney; its
been years since OSU has won 20 games; this is the 1st year since
1965 that OSU has been 14-0 at home; and (if OSU wins at Iowa St
Saturday) they will win the Big8. (An outright win if Nebraska beats
Kansas Saturday).
Cowboy
|
18.84 | Big Eight Tournament | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 04 1991 14:35 | 15 |
| Friday's first-round games:
11:10 am, Missouri (4) 16-10, 8-6, vs. Iowa State (5) 12-18, 6,8
1:20 pm, Oklahoma St. (1) 21-6, 10-4, vs. Kansas St. (8) 13-14, 3-11
5:10 pm, Kansas (2) 21-6, 10-4, vs. Colorado (7) 15-12, 5-9
7:20 pm, Nebraska (3) 24-6, 9-5, vs. Oklahoma (6) 16-13, 5-9
The tournament is at Kemper Arena, all times are mountain.
Joe
|
18.85 | There is no place like Nebraska, DA DA DA DA DA DAAAAA... | CX3PST::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Mon Mar 04 1991 16:37 | 6 |
| 1st round winners * SHOULD * be Missouri, Oklahoma State, Kansas,
and Nebraska. However, this is the game of basketball (best of all sports
in my opinion) and this is the Big-8, therefore chances of an upset or 2
run high.
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.86 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 11 1991 13:07 | 17 |
| As expected going into the weekend, the Big 8 only got 3 teams into the
tourney, but all 3 ended up with #3 seeds. Kansas should be able to
make it to the Sweet 16. OSU's first 2 games should be fairly tough,
New Mexico only because they have Longley to counter with Houston, and
then OSU could be playing NC State in the 2nd round. As for Nebraska,
I think they'll get knocked out in the 2nd round by LSU or UConn, that
is if they get by Xavier, who suprised some people last year.
Missouri beat Nebraska in the Big 8 title game yesterday, but the
Tigers are on probation. But as of next year, the Big 8 has a new rule
that no team on probation can play in the Big 8 tournament.
Colorado and Oklahoma got into the NIT. Michigan plays at Colorado
Wednesday night, and Tulsa plays at Oklahoma on Thursday night.
Joe
|
18.87 | What the hell happened to OU? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 11 1991 13:23 | 26 |
|
What happened to Oklahoma? I was following the game score for a while,
and it looked like they had an insurmountable lead late in the game
Friday night against Nebraska. Then I find out they lost in overtime.
Oklahoma seems to be in need of a character check, starting with Billy
Tubbs. Granted, they lost all their starters from last year, but this
year's team seemed to pretty decent early, just the opposite of what
you'd expect. Then they just flat-out collapsed. It didn't matter
what the competition was, they'd find a way to lose. Good thing they
didn't have any late-season games against Oklahoma City Community
College or anyone like that. This is the same team that at least gave
Arkansas and Duke a little bit of a fight early in the season, too.
As much as people couldn't stand Barry Switzer, this is one Oklahoma
fan who considers Tubbs to be much the worse. Tubbs has maintained
all of Barry's bad qualities, but possesses none of the good ones,
like the ability to coach his way to a victory in a big game (like last
year when even 'Snuf gave him a clinic in the NCAAs). Combined with
his outspoken opposition to NCAA reform, I think he's doing the
university a major disservice. Maybe it'd be worth a probation to get
rid of him. Considering that the NCAA has come down all around him in
the Big 8, he must be staying clean, though, I guess...
glenn
|
18.88 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:33 | 15 |
| > <<< Note 18.87 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
-< What the hell happened to OU? >-
What happened to Oklahoma? I was following the game score for a while,
and it looked like they had an insurmountable lead late in the game
Friday night against Nebraska. Then I find out they lost in overtime.
glenn, OU is probably still suffering from injuries. I think that
they had several after the season began which must have really knocked
them outa their game plan.
Cowboy
|
18.89 | GO BIG RED !!! | CX3PST::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:27 | 15 |
| What happened to Oklahoma?
Nebraska put on a furious rally in the last 1.5 min of regulation. I thought
Nebraska was beat and was mentally preparing myself for a fairly low seed
in the "big dance." The Okie's had succesfully stopped Nebraska's 3 point
game most of the game by denying attempts. I dont know if Oklahoma fell
asleep thinking the win was is the bag or what but suddenly NU started canning
3 pointers including one at the buzzer to send it into overtime.
Because Nebraska had beaten sure death, the momentum was all theirs in the OT.
What a great game. Between this game and the Celts/Blazers game last night
I think I need to have my blood pressure checked. ;^)
Husker Hoops Henderson
|
18.90 | Big Red falls, Kansas & Okie State move on... | CX3PST::WHITIE::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Fri Mar 15 1991 12:44 | 9 |
| Okie State and Kansas win at the "Big Dance" in the first round. Nebraska
lost by 6 (I think) to Xavier of Ohio. I saw most of the game and the Huskers
looked really tight. I think they were the more talented team but just got
beat by a good them that has been to the NCAA's many times.
Huskers have nothing to be ashamed of though. Great season.
Takes some of the football hurt away.
Husker Hoops Marty
|
18.91 | Hey, this is getting FUN... | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Mar 18 1991 00:05 | 16 |
| The Cowboys' 2nd game, against NC State, was a great one to watch--
especially after the shakey one against New Mexico. OSU kept NCSt
30 points under their scoring average with their tough defense and
rebounding. Cowboys' shots from the line were WAY above their average
too. At the beginning of the tourney I felt that they had a decent
chance of making it to the Final-4 and now I can still see it as long
as their shooting stays hot and they get some breaks in the next
couple of games. The East has looked like the easiest of the four
although no team can expect to coast through a tournament like this.
(Except possibly UNLV).
Hope that both OSU and KU keep winning but I'm NOT happy about the
fact that they would have to face each other.
Cowboy
|
18.92 | Any Wrasslin' news? | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Mon Mar 18 1991 10:52 | 9 |
| Does anyone have the team scoring for the NCAA Wrestling Tournament?
All I can find is indivual scores.
The OSU Women bball team is keeping up with the Men's team so far.
The Midwest 5th seeded Women are ALSO in the Sweet-16. They
opened by beating (12)DePaul 81-80, and then beat (4)Michigan St
96-94 in TRIPLE OT! Next up is (1)Virginia Thursday.
Cowboy
|
18.93 | Mayberry? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:40 | 7 |
| Help..last one...:*)
How many points did Mayberry have in the second game?
Thx..
B.A.
|
18.94 | Try McPaper or The National | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:42 | 3 |
| Yo, B.A., grab a sports page or two, dude.
Bob Hunt
|
18.95 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:51 | 6 |
| C'mon Bob...
You know that unless Clemson gets into the dance, the papers down
here don't cover B-ball! :*) Only Racin'! :*)
B.A.
|
18.96 | | REFINE::ASHE | Left, around & together w/ the right.. | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:32 | 1 |
| Yeah, but they'd cover that Arkansas is in the SWC...
|
18.97 | | DELREY::POLAY_CH | Warmer in CA than MA! | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:45 | 5 |
| re .93
Mayberry had 14 yesterday vs. ASU
|
18.98 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 18 1991 18:49 | 9 |
| re-97.
Thank you!
re-96.
They are now in the SEC...offically! :*)
B.A.
|
18.99 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Mar 19 1991 08:32 | 4 |
| I don't know the team scores but I read in yesterday's National that
Iowa won the Wrestling National Championship.
John
|
18.100 | | FTMUDG::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Tue Mar 19 1991 09:13 | 12 |
| Re: -1 Thanks for the bad news. Iowa seemed to be favored going in
and was hyped some by the AP stories. It did seem strange that the
papers never really mentioned OKlahoma State going after their 3rd
championship in a row especially since OSU had 9 wrestlers that
qualified (Iowa had 10). I may have to break down and subscribe to
an Oklahoma newspaper one of these days to get the facts.
Now its up to the basketball team to bring home a championship.
UNLV who?
Cowboy
|
18.101 | One more win and CU is Big Apple-bound | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 19 1991 09:59 | 5 |
| Colorado beat Wyoming last night in the 2nd round of the NIT, and the
Buffs will host Arkansas State on Thursday. The winner of that game
goes to the NIT final four in New York.
Joe
|
18.102 | 4 BIG-8 teams still alive.... | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Tue Mar 19 1991 11:14 | 9 |
| OU is still winning too. It sounded like Wyoming was still mad
that they weren't invited to go to the NCAA and weren't up for
the NIT.
How does Temple matchup with OSU's defense? Doesn't Temple shoot
well from the outside?
Cowboy
|
18.103 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | Dean and Chris-Life's 13 pt underdogs | Tue Mar 19 1991 11:19 | 9 |
|
Temple has two legit outside bombers in Macon and Vic Carstopvanitch (spelling
moidered). Vic has pro range so does Macon. Best defense for Macon is to just
let him shoot. If you put a hand in his face he'll bury you, leave him wide
open and CLANG!...
Two very good defensive clubs.
mike
|
18.104 | This time I won't be stuck in Sam's Whrhs | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Tue Mar 19 1991 11:41 | 4 |
| Ah, another good, physical, low-scoring struggle with the last coupla
minutes of tackle-the-man-with-the-ball. I cain't wait! 8*)
Cowboy
|
18.105 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 19 1991 12:26 | 12 |
| As Childs mentioned, Temple is a very good defensive team. They have
good size in their front line, but are still outrebounded for the
year.
RE-Wyoming
Yea, they were less than thrilled about being in the NIT after being in
the NCAA's in '87 and '88. Meanwhile, CU is pumped up about being in
any kind of postseason play, since this is their first postseason
appearance in 22 years. Wyoming only drew about 5000 fans for their
opener against Butler.
Joe
|
18.106 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Mar 19 1991 12:41 | 19 |
| Temple is one, tough physical team. They are a more talented, physical
version of Princeton - at least in their approach to the game.
Both teams will run if the opportunity is there, otherwise, they'll
hold the ball until they get a good shot. Temple does not run a
motion offense like Princeton does.
Temple is far more physical and intimidating on defense than Princeton
is. Temple defenders get chest-to-chest with the man they're guarding
and give them literally no time to shoot.
Vic Carstarphen is the guy you're thinking of, Mike. In the game where
I saw Temple live, he really picked up the slack for the missing Mark
Macon. Temple played pretty darn well without Macon in that game.
Anyone who plays Temple, when Temple is playing well, has their hands
full.
John
|
18.107 | BIG-8 isn't for just football anymore... | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:08 | 34 |
| BIG-8 teams are still looking good. Kansas surprised Indiana last
night when they built a 20-point lead just 7.5 minutes into the
game. It was a case of the ball bouncing KU's way and KU doing
no wrong. On the other hand Indiana didn't look emotionally ready
to play and whatever Bobby Knight tried to get his team moving
didn't work. The only times it looked like Indiana would catch up
was when KU's outside shots cooled off. But then, KU would then
turn on the heat. After KU built their 20 point lead the rest of
the game was mainly an exercise by KU to merely stay hot enough
to stay 15-20 ahead until the end--which they did very well.
Indiana never seemed to panic or get frustrated. But they never
could get in command of the game either. Personally, I expected
more outa a Knight team. It looked like KU was prepared in all
phases and Indiana was not.
In the NIT, Colorado didn't have much trouble with a good Arkansas
State team. CU had good leads throughout the game with ASt coming
back and making it close. CU has come a long way when you consider
their 12-18 season last year (and all the pitiful records before
then). With a 18-13 record so far CU goes to the Garden for semi-
finals. Oklahoma is still alive, too, but the matchups haven't been
anounced.
Oklahoma State goes against Temple tonight for the chance to play
the NoCar/EMich winner for the East title/Final4 spot. This is
really more than I had expected especially after the opener against
New Mexico. Hopefully, OSU will stay hot to make it to the Final4.
They SHOULD handle Temple and then SHOULD be fired up for NC. I
feel OSU can beat them if they can shoot hot and don't turn over
the ball as much as they have. The team has been rebounding well
and will definitely have to be able to complete with NC there too.
Cowboy
|
18.108 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:15 | 8 |
| It doesn't matter who wins the Colorado - Oklahoma game, because UMass
will beat either one of them.
Of course, I'm not saying whether it will be in the title game or the
consolation game ....
John (who's enjoying the chance to gloat about his basketball team for
the first time in year)
|
18.109 | | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Fri Mar 22 1991 10:23 | 8 |
| You're probably right. I thing CU won 1 road game against a BIG-8
team this year (and breaking a 50+ loosing streak) and will surely
choke away from home. And I hope I have to eat crow.
As to OU, they may be getting health by now and could be tougher
than they were the last half of the season--but I haven't heard
anything.
|
18.110 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Mar 22 1991 11:17 | 17 |
| CU only did win 1 conference road game, at Iowa State. However, they did
win at Wake Forest early in the year, and it was by something like 17
points. The NIT semis have been set: UMASS will play Stanford in the
early game, and CU will play OU in the 2nd game. These are Monday
night.
It's good to see the Big 8 doing well in postseason this year after
nobody even made the Sweet 16 last year. Granted, OU and CU are only
in the NIT, but it's great exposure for CU and the conference. I
imagine it's less than thrilling for OU after all their recent NCAA
appearances. This could be a good springboard for the Buffs, although
I'm pretty sure they're losing most of their starters.
I expect OSU to win tonight, but they should have their hands full with
UNC.
Joe
|
18.111 | A lil Roy Rodgers to break the silence... | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Fri Mar 22 1991 13:58 | 7 |
| It was "happy trails" to the Cowgirls who bit the dust last night
when Virginia rode them to a 76-61 win. Atleast these fillies
shouldn't head home with their tails between their legs. They
started the tourney ranked #25.
Cowboy
|
18.112 | Where is MrT ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:24 | 7 |
| Hey Bobby Knight ...
Pantheon THIS !!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
18.113 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Un Rosalind der schplat | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:48 | 12 |
| Doc,
Who's your favorite coach or team? Lemme guess...uh, UNLV - yeah
right, that's the ticket.
I'm not a hoosier fan, nor a Bobby Knight fan, but he's got 3 titles,
and he's a better coach then Smith, Tark, K, Lute, etc.
You goint to wait til after the Final Four to decide who you're team is
this year.
JD
|
18.114 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Mon Mar 25 1991 08:57 | 7 |
| JD, will you PLEASE stop you whining ? You're sounding like Bobby
Hurley a little more every day.
And please come up with a more original line sometime before the end of
the decade, OK ?
Zzzzzz .....
|
18.115 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Mon Mar 25 1991 11:04 | 10 |
| Doc,
I'm not whining. Just waiting for the day that *in advance* you claim
allegiance to a team, and stick with *that* team for a whole season.
So Doc, who is it, KU, UNLV, UNC or Duke that's your favorite *NOW*
I thought you were a HOuston Cougar fan? They haven't played in weeks.
JD
|
18.116 | Like I said, you're whining kid ... | LUNER::BROOKS | Pick up the pace .... | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:32 | 5 |
| Actaully, I've been cheering Arkansas and UNLV. I've also hoped that
Macon and Temple could do some deep damage.
JD, your selective memory will let you believe what you want to ...
I've seen that during football season ....
|
18.117 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:35 | 11 |
| Seen what during football sason Doc? I've rooted for the Giants since
pre-school days. So youse barking up the wrong true there, kid. Or,
are you still mad about my calling hte Oilers a wimp team for playing a
stat-inflating offense?
Anyway, this is the Big8 note, so enough of that.
JD
PS: Kansas sure surprised a lot of folks on Saturday. I still think
that foul-shooting will come back to haunt them.
|
18.118 | I want the inside scoop on who UMass will be playing! | WORDY::NAZZARO | UMass: NIT Final Four now; NCAA next | Mon Mar 25 1991 15:57 | 3 |
| WHo's the favorite in tonight's Oklahoma-Colorado matchup in the NIT?
NAZZ
|
18.119 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Mar 25 1991 16:24 | 3 |
| WHo cares? Minutemen will kick butt on either one.
John
|
18.120 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Mar 25 1991 19:08 | 4 |
| Oklahoma is favored by 4.5 over CU
Stanford is favored by 3.5 over UMass
|
18.121 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Mar 26 1991 08:46 | 8 |
|
Damned Tubbs won again.
Anyone know how old that huy named "House" is who plays for CU? Looks
about 30.
Rich
|
18.122 | Second half comeback???? | JURAN::WEST | | Tue Mar 26 1991 08:59 | 5 |
|
Colorado was ahead 49-36 at half time...what the hell happened
heard the final was 88-78 Oklahoma!!!!
kevin
|
18.123 | Good year for the Cowboys!! | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:40 | 32 |
| The Temple/OSU game had to be one of the most exhausting and
frustrating games I've seen. If OSU 3-point shooting hadn't
been so unusually hot it could have turned into a real blowout
early on but instead the game was a nail biter until the end
of OT. I know it's sour grapes but the fact that Temple sent
the wrong player to the line for a couple of free-throws--and
made them both--still has me a bit hot. The kid that was supposed
to take the shots had something like a 45% average and the one
that actually took the shoot was shooting around 75%. Using
simple mathematics I came up with the conclusion that if the
correct player had taken the shots the odds were that he wouldn't
have made more than 1 of the 2 shots. Then, at the end of the
game, when OSU had made the beautiful almost-3-pointer, OSU
would have won the game. No Over-Time would be needed. Then
again, if the refs would have given OSU a small break they
could have called this last shot a 3-pointer--but I wouldn't
feel good about a tainted win. (A tainted loss aint much
better tho').
Anyway, OSU missed the chance, by a hair, to play N Carolina.
And from the score (I missed the game) may very well have matched
up better with NC than with Temple and their defense (that OSU
had never seen before). The Cowboys were very close to the
Final4 this year and should feel good about this year. Not bad
for Sutton's first year as head coach.
Kansas is playing well and hopefully will make it to the big
game against UNLV. Who knows, KU may catch the cheaters when
they're asleep and beat 'em. Hope they get the chance.
Cowboy
|
18.124 | A clutch shot that I thought had won the game... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 26 1991 09:45 | 15 |
|
> Then, at the end of the
> game, when OSU had made the beautiful almost-3-pointer, OSU
> would have won the game. No Over-Time would be needed. Then
> again, if the refs would have given OSU a small break they
> could have called this last shot a 3-pointer--but I wouldn't
> feel good about a tainted win. (A tainted loss aint much
> better tho').
I don't know. In spite of the claims of the announcers, I couldn't
tell whether or not the guy's foot was on the line. If it had gone the
other way, I don't think there would have been much of a complaint.
glenn
|
18.125 | | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Tue Mar 26 1991 10:03 | 6 |
| I have no idea either if it was a 3-pointer since the TV
reception was so poor. I just thought that the refs might
call it 3 because of their earlier screw up with the free
throw shooters.
|
18.126 | VERY disappointing 2nd half for Buffs :( | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 26 1991 10:30 | 16 |
| CU lost to OU last night 88-78. Make that, CU choked against OU last
night. I was only able to catch bits and pieces of the game because my
wife was watching that stupid awards thing. But I didn't need to see
much to realize this 2nd-half collapse was typical of the Buffs'
season. CU had a 10-point lead just before intermission, and then
Vandiver hit a long 3-pointer to put them up by 13 at the half. They
led by 14 with about 13 minutes left. Then Tubbs installed a trap that
CU had trouble with, plus they went stone cold from the field as OU won
going away. CU play UMass Wednesday evening in a consolation game
(big deal).
RE: OSU 3-pointer at end of Temple game
It looked like his foot was on the line to me. Too bad for OSU, I was
pulling for 'em.
Joe
|
18.127 | Mark Randall cover of S.I. this week! | STA201::MCNIEL | | Wed Mar 27 1991 17:12 | 11 |
| ?? HOUSTON+SUTTON='92NCAACHAMPS ??
I'm with you. But, Eddie's got to Dicipline/Control Houston a
little bit more. His weak off balance last second shot in
the Temple game says it all.
Reminds me a little of a young Manning when he was trying to do
it all for Kansas. Good Luck...but dont forget Roy and the boys!
Kansas Comet
|
18.128 | Houston and Pittman got attitude adjustments... | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Thu Mar 28 1991 09:18 | 23 |
| > <<< Note 18.127 by STA201::MCNIEL >>>
> -< Mark Randall cover of S.I. this week! >-
>
> ?? HOUSTON+SUTTON='92NCAACHAMPS ??
>
> I'm with you. But, Eddie's got to Dicipline/Control Houston a
> little bit more. His weak off balance last second shot in
> the Temple game says it all.
Big Ed HAS had some effect on the team. I read awhile back that
both Houston and Pittman are members of the "5 and 5 Club". The
"club members" are players that Sutton drove out to the edge of
town to where the "Welcome to Stillwater" sign is. This is FIVE
miles from campus and at FIVE o'clock in the AM. The club member
has to walk back to school. Both Houston and Pittman supposedly
have more respect for Sutton now and in Houston's case it definitely
has helped him control his fighting during games. He used to be
quick to retaliate during games but now has shown to hold up.
Congrats to CU for their win. OU lost
Cowboy
|
18.129 | Big 8 Hoops in '92 | STA201::MCNIEL | | Thu Mar 28 1991 09:42 | 20 |
| Cowboy,
Any predictions on next years Big 8 (B-ball) finish?
Mine would read like this:
1. Oklahoma St. (who's coming back?)
2. Kansas (No Seniors...excellent recruiting crop - #2 in U.S.)
3. Colorado (who's coming back?)
4. Oklahoma (Tubb's...any relation to Tark the Shark)
5. Missouri (Lose scorers - Peeler & Smith)
6. Nebraska (lose everybody...love the Coach and his gangster suits)
7. Iowa St. (I think they lose Victor "the school bus" this year)
8. K-State (low on talent...needs Hartman back)
On paper...The Big 8 may be lucky to field 2-3 teams in the Tourney
next year. Any thoughts?
Comet
|
18.130 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Mar 28 1991 10:13 | 18 |
| > 3. Colorado (who's coming back?)
Well I don't know the exact numbers of who is coming back, I do know
that 3 of CU's premier players will be gone. They Shaun Vandiver, who
has been all Big-8 the last 2 years, Stevie Wise, and Rodell "House"
Guest. Note: Guest's basketball eligibility has been used up, but he
will be trying out for a linebacker position on the football team this
fall, because he has another year of school. Harrington definitely has
the program moving in the right direction, but I would be pessimistic
about expecting this team to take the next step forward next season,
which would be making the NCAA field.
Right now I would say next year's team will be respectable, but won't
do quite as well as this year's team did.
Meanwhile, it's almost time for spring football!
Joe
|
18.131 | Where is Gale Sayers when you need him? | STA201::MCNIEL | | Thu Mar 28 1991 11:05 | 16 |
| Joe,
1. Any chance Colorado is going to open up there Offense and Defense
to reflect a more PRO-style?
I've been wrestling with this for years. You know, the Big 3's
predictable attack offensively as well as there inability to Defense
the pass (ala Miami, ND, etc...). Hopefully your not a "bone/option"
biggot. I just feel the Big 3 needs to open it up a little.
2. CU's schedule next year? Is it as tough as last years?
3. Do you think CU could get a pre-season ranking of #1 for '92?
Kansas Comet
|
18.132 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Mar 28 1991 12:52 | 46 |
|
> 1. Any chance Colorado is going to open up there Offense and Defense
> to reflect a more PRO-style?
Not in the next couple of years. Although we don't now who the
starting QB will be next fall, it will be a predominantly option guy.
The 3 possibilities are Hagan (recovering from OB knee injury), Johnson
(still contemplating whether to give up football to concentrate on
school), and Vance Joseph (he will be the starter if Hagan or Johnson
aren't the starter. In '89 they were predominantly ran much more than
passed, although Hagan did pass and run for 1000 yards that season.
Last year Hagan increased his passing yardage significantly, although
his efficiency went down. I expect CU to pass at least as much as last
year if not more no matter who the QB is, but as far as going to a more
pro style, no, they just haven't recruited that kind of QB.
> 2. CU's schedule next year? Is it as tough as last years?
Not even close. Their 4 non-conference games are Wyoming, Baylor, and
Minnesota all at home, and at Stanford. Not *real* bad, but a far cry
from one of the nation's toughest schedules.
> 3. Do you think CU could get a pre-season ranking of #1 for '92?
I assume you mean this year ('91, not '92)
No. They'll probably be ranked in the top 10 due to last year's
championship, but I think they belong in the 2nd 10 going into '91.
I liken this team somewhat to Notre Dame for the upcoming season. Both
are losing a lot of great talent, but on the other hand they have the
talent sitting there waiting, just needs to develop and get experience
(although ND undoubtedly has much more talent, but you see what I
mean). With the fairly easy non-con schedule, I see no reason this
team can't go undefeated until they meet OU or NU, and by then they
may have jelled into one of the nation's top teams. I don't expect
anything like the last 2 seasons, but 9 or 10 wins certainly isn't out
of the question. As a matter of fact, if they win less than 9 in the
regular season, I will be somewhat disappointed.
BTW, my nephew goes to KU, and he tells me they're gonna have a good
team this fall. He didn't mean top 10 or anything that great, but it
sounds like 6 or 7 wins isn't out of the question. Their schedule has
to be easier than last year's, and I heard they dropped their game with
Miami in Lawrence.
Joe
|
18.133 | High hopes for Oklahoma | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Mar 28 1991 13:19 | 9 |
|
The way they finished up last year, and coming off probation, I
*expect*, and not hope, that Oklahoma will win the Big 8 title next
year and be returning to the Orange Bowl. I think they have the
personnel to do it, and with Colorado and Nebraska graduating a lot of
their talent, they may even be the pre-season favorite.
glenn
|
18.134 | Which is greater? Final 4 or Orange Bowl? | STA201::MCNIEL | | Thu Mar 28 1991 13:20 | 22 |
| Joe,
I can't field any KU football futures. You see, I'm still
mourning KU's overtime loss to Penn St in the Orange Bowl ('68).
We lost because we had 12 men on the field.
I have heard positive rumblings from Lawerence though. In fact I
predict a #4 finish this year (Big 8). The talk is KU can hang with
anybody in the Big 8 for the first 2 to 3 quarters. The problem with
the Hawks is depth. We can field 22 and thats it!! Injuries and
the game lasting 4 quarters kills us. Predominately this is a
recruiting problem that stems from the bulk of our talent leaving the
state to go E, W, N, or S ...but not to Lawrence.
Seriously, as an alumn of '81...we've obviously been more proud
of our round ball ('86, '88, & '91 FINAL 4 appearances). However,
it would be pretty slick to slip in the Top 3 sometime....maybe in
my lifetime.
Go Hawks - Hammer the Heels!!
Comet
|
18.135 | BIG-8...the new basketball conference? | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Thu Mar 28 1991 14:01 | 21 |
| Comet, I really like your bball predictions for next year and can't
argue with it. (Especially with OSU at the top of the list) Wasn't
KU picked to end up around the middle of the BIG-8 for this year?
Anyway, they certainly are ending their season hot.
Recapping the BIG-8 bball year:
Kansas co-BIG-8 champs, Final 4(or better) in NCAA tourney
Okla St co-BIG-8 champs, Sweet 16 in NCAA tourney
Nebraska made NCAA tourney play
Missouri BIG-8 tourney winner (ineligible for NCAA tourney)
Oklahoma 2nd place in NIT tourney
Colorado 3rd place in NIT tourney
Kansas State and Iowa State--probably would have been respectable
in either NCAA or NIT tourneys if they had been invited
Overall, a real competitive conference this year.
Cowboy
|
18.136 | Ricardo Scottolini | STA201::MCNIEL | | Mon Apr 01 1991 00:04 | 14 |
| Richard Scott? ....a freshman?
I cant believe my eyes! He played possesed!!
I've followed the team all year...and he just hasn't seen much playing
time. But, did you see him in the first half?
Unbelieveable...
Anybody got anything on this guy?
Comet
|
18.137 | a couple of good games... | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Mon Apr 01 1991 10:08 | 14 |
| re: Scott
I don't know anything about him and I wish I didn't miss the game.
KU was 10-1 odds at winning the NCAA before the Final4 started.
Anyone know the line or odds now? They should have a good shot
at it especially after Duke's fantastic upset. That was a GREAT
game. Anytime UNLV looses is great. The paper today talks about
the parties and parades all being cancelled in Vegas. I can't
feel sorry for them.
GO 'hawks
Cowboy
|
18.138 | | 29633::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Apr 08 1991 12:42 | 15 |
| Well, it's opening day...
...for spring football at Colorado!!!!
The Buffs are losing 7 starters on offense and 5 on defense. Their
biggest concern will be rebuilding the offensive line, where they lose
3 starters. House Guest will be trying to earn a spot at OLB, where
Kanavis McGhee and Alfred Williams have left big holes. Hagan's rehab
is going as scheduled and he will start running this month. He is
expected to play next season, but to what extent is unknown at this
time.
Joe
|
18.140 | OSU wins it again!!!! | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Mon May 20 1991 15:01 | 6 |
| Oklahoma State beat OU for the BIG-8 Tourney Championship this last
weekend. That's the one and only BIG-8 game the Colorado papers gave
a score on.
Cowboy
|
18.141 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Tue Jul 16 1991 12:06 | 9 |
| McCartney suspended starting right guard Bryan Campbell for the 1991
season. All Mac would say is he broke team rules.
At Nebraska, Mike Grant said he will redshirt this year if he doesn't
win the starting QB job. Joseph is projected as their starter, but is
expected to get a good challenge from Grant and Tom Haas(sp). Haas is
a good passer and played well in relief of Grant in the Citrus Bowl.
Joe
|
18.142 | 1991 Big Eight Schedules | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Tue Jul 16 1991 12:35 | 46 |
|
COLORADO IOWA STATE KANSAS
---------------- ----------------- -----------------
S7 WYOMING S7 E. ILLINOIS S7 @ Toledo
S14 BAYLOR S14 IOWA S14 TULSA
S21 MINNESOTA S21 @ Wisconsin S21 NEW MEXICO ST.
S28 @ Stanford S28 @ Rice O5 @ Virginia
O12 MISSOURI O5 OKLAHOMA O12 @ Kansas St.
O19 @ Oklahoma O19 @ Kansas O19 IOWA ST.
O26 @ Kansas St. O26 OKLAHOMA ST. O26 @ Oklahoma
N2 NEBRASKA N2 @ Missouri N2 @ Oklahoma St.
N9 @ Oklahoma St. N9 KANSAS ST. N9 NEBRASKA
N16 KANSAS N16 @ Nebraska N16 @ Colorado
N23 @ Iowa St. N23 COLORADO N23 MISSOURI
KANSAS ST. MISSOURI NEBRASKA
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
S7 INDIANA ST. S14 ILLINOIS S7 UTAH ST.
S14 IDAHO ST. S21 @ Baylor S14 COLORADO ST.
S21 N. ILLINOIS S28 INDIANA S21 WASHINGTON
S28 @ Washington O5 MEMPHIS ST. S28 @ Arizona St.
O12 KANSAS O12 @ Colorado O12 @ Oklahoma St.
O19 @ Nebraska O19 OKLAHOMA ST. O19 KANSAS ST.
O26 COLORADO O26 @ Nebraska O26 MISSOURI
N2 @ Oklahoma N2 IOWA ST. N2 @ Colorado
N9 @ Iowa St. N9 OKLAHOMA N9 @ Kansas
N16 MISSOURI N16 @ Kansas St. N16 IOWA ST.
N23 @ Oklahoma St. N23 @ Kansas N29 OKLAHOMA
OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA ST.
------------------ -----------------
S14 NORTH TEXAS S7 @ Tulsa
S21 UTAH ST. S14 ARIZONA ST.
S28 VIRGINIA TECH S21 TCU
O5 @ Iowa St. O5 @ Miami(Fla.)
O12 Texas (at Dallas) O12 NEBRASKA
O19 COLORADO O19 @ Missouri
O26 KANSAS O26 @ Iowa St.
N2 KANSAS ST. N2 KANSAS
N9 @ Missouri N9 COLORADO
N16 OKLAHOMA ST. N16 @ Oklahoma
N29 @ Nebraska N23 KANSAS ST.
|
18.143 | Are you sure these games aren't swapped??? | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Wed Jul 17 1991 15:28 | 18 |
| > OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA ST.
> ------------------ -----------------
> S14 NORTH TEXAS S7 @ Tulsa
> S21 UTAH ST. S14 ARIZONA ST.
> S28 VIRGINIA TECH S21 TCU
> O5 @ Iowa St. O5 @ Miami(Fla.)
> O12 Texas (at Dallas) O12 NEBRASKA
OU's soft pre-season should help them start off on the right foot.
On the other hand, this year's OSU team will be lucky to win 1-2
of their 1st 5 games. My poor team is supposed to take the cellar
this year anyway but I still hate to see them blown away too many
times this year!
Hope OSU can surprise some teams this year.
Cowboy
|
18.144 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Terminate her too. | Wed Jul 17 1991 17:24 | 5 |
| >>season. All Mac would say is he broke team rules.
Whaddhe do? refuse to assult someone?
|
18.145 | GO BIG RED FOREVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Mon Jul 29 1991 17:14 | 76 |
| > Oklahoma State beat OU for the BIG-8 Tourney Championship this last
> weekend. That's the one and only BIG-8 game the Colorado papers gave
> a score on.
> Cowboy
This is the norm for Colorado sport press, unfortunately. When I lived in
Omaha, if there was anything going on in the Big-8 it was reported. I get
much more info from this note about the Big-8 than I could ever get from
the Colorado press.
Now that I've gotten that off my chest, here is a little news I got from
the boys in Omaha Field Svc...
See if you can figure out what * MIGHT * happen next year at Nebraska from
this recent small chain of events:
Bob Devany anounces that he will retire as Nebraska Athletic Director
after this year.
A long time Nebraska assistant coach (the name is on the tip of my
tongue but I just can't recall it right now) is promoted to the title
of "Head Assistant Football Coach."
Osborne under intense pressure from fans and media after 2 poor seasons.
Osborne announces he is going to "open the offense up" this year.
The way I read this is that * POTENIALLY * next year - Osborne steps down as
head football coach and accepts position as Nebraska Athletic Director. The
"Head Assistant Football Coach" is promoted to Head Football Coach.
Could it be that BIG changes are on the horizon for Nebraska Football? I hope
so !!! It's time for some changes. A lot of things are pointing toward the
modernization of the Husker offense. Hey, if Oklahoma can dump the wishbone
then NU can change and pass the fricking ball !!!
I-back Flowers has resigned from the NU program. No reasons given in the press.
Sophmore Brown is much better than him anyway.
Osborne announced that Mickey Joseph is the starting QB going into summer camp.
Haase is not far behind and if Haase takes the starting role then the Huskers
could throw the ball 25-30 times per game.
If they can make that effective, just think how effetive it could be MIXED
with Nebraska's running game.
Well, that's about all I have for now.
Just some personal thoughts about the upcomeing season:
Oklahoma has to be the pre-season favorite to win the Big-8.
The long-term strength of Colorado's program will be severely tested
this year as they lost the bulk of their talent and offensive line.
Nebraska and Oklahoma have "reloaded" year after year. This year will
tell if Colorado can start a "reload" trend of their own.
Nebraska is once again a question mark. They have excellent skill
position talent but it is young. What about the defense? They lost
some talent high in the NFL draft, but we all know that they dident
have much more talent than what was drafted. Can they beef up their
interior defensive line? This was their defensive weakness last year.
Colorado will be virtually untested in pre-Big-8 play, just as
Nebraska was last year.
Nebraska has a tougher pre-Big-8 schedule this year than the last
few years. Colorado has the equiv. of the Huskers schedule from the
last 2 years and Oklahoma has a mild pre-season schedule also. Nebr.
plays at Colorado, Oklahoma plays at Nebraska, and Colorado plays
at Oklahoma.
It's way to early for any predictions,
Husker Henderson
|
18.146 | Holy Cow...Marty's alive!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jul 29 1991 18:03 | 35 |
|
> This is the norm for Colorado sport press, unfortunately. When I lived in
> Omaha, if there was anything going on in the Big-8 it was reported. I get
> much more info from this note about the Big-8 than I could ever get from
> the Colorado press.
Marty, have you tried The Denver Post? It probably doesn't stack up to
what you're used to in Omaha, but it sure beats the local paper, the
Calhan Gazette(tm). Hell, all that paper's good for is reading about
figure skating or the Sky Jokes(tm).
> Oklahoma has to be the pre-season favorite to win the Big-8.
They are.
> The long-term strength of Colorado's program will be severely tested
> this year as they lost the bulk of their talent and offensive line.
> Nebraska and Oklahoma have "reloaded" year after year. This year will
> tell if Colorado can start a "reload" trend of their own.
This is a good point, that CU doesn't end up being a short stint like
West Virginia of 1988, for example. While they are expected to drop
off this year, I think anything less than 8-3 would be a big
disappointment.
> Colorado will be virtually untested in pre-Big-8 play, just as
> Nebraska was last year.
Wrong. Do you realize that Baylor is ranked in most preseason top
20's and Inside Sports has Baylor ranked ahead of the Buffs? And the
game at Stanford is not going to be any cakewalk. A loss in the
preseason is certainly not out of the question.
Joe
|
18.147 | Don't whimp out, you wouldent let me last year... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Tue Jul 30 1991 13:29 | 25 |
| > Title: Holy Cow...Marty's alive!!!
Yea I'm alive, but I barely made it through last season alive. ;^)
No, make that the last 2 seasons. Remember - I'm an avid Husker fan living
in Colorado !!!
Joe, it remains to be seen if Baylor is really any good. I remember last
year us Husker fans trying to eek out anything positive possible from the
Huskers embaressing schedule. Well I just don't see any difference between
the Huskers last year and Colorado this year. The Buffs schedule is just
as weak as Nebraska's last year. Why don't you just accept it and admit
that it's a bad schedule like I did last year? Remember, this schedule was
made way before Colorado was even a good team so it's not a case of McArtney
manipulating anything in his favor.
I'm glad Nebraska has at least a respectable schedule this year. Now * IF *
the Huskers can go unbeaten in the 4 pre-conference games they can potentialy
gain some real respect again.
Geez I hope Osborne starts Haase and gets "a passing life!!!!"
Nebraska Marty aka Husker Henderson, Big Red Bad Boy, Bugeater Bob...
|
18.148 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Jul 30 1991 13:52 | 19 |
| The difference in CU's schedule of this year and NU's of last year is
CU doesn't have a Northern Illinois on their schedule. CU has 2
losable games on their preseason schedule, whereas NU only had 1 last
year. I will certainly admit CU's non-con schedule is weak, but IMO
it's not quite as weak as NU's of the last couple of years.
NU fans should be very happy if the Huskers finish the preseason
unbeaten. Washington is considered to be a legitimate top 5 team.
But you're right, we need to wait and see if certain teams are as good
as they're cracked up to be. I remember seeing Pitt ranked in some top
10's last year, and they only won 3 games. On the other hand, some
didn't even have Georgia Tech ranked before the season started.
Oklahoma could end up having the easiest non-con schedule when it's all
over if Texas ends up being a disappointment. Their other 3 games are
sure wins. I wouldn't be surprised to OU run the table this year.
Joe
|
18.149 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | And There's a steal by Bird... | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:44 | 1 |
| College pre-season ratings are worthless.
|
18.150 | 1-OU 2-NU 3-CU 4-The rest of us........ | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Tue Jul 30 1991 14:53 | 8 |
| > College pre-season ratings are worthless.
I hope you're right Marty, Oklahoma State is favored to take the cellar
this year. But then, this is the first year they haven't had an
experienced RB. In fact, none of their RBs have ever carried the
ball in a college game!! It looks to be a loooong year.
Cowboy
|
18.151 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Larry, Curly, and Modell | Wed Aug 14 1991 14:17 | 105 |
|
Taken from The Denver Post, August 11th, written by John Henderson
CU Question Marks/Good news, bad news for 1991
An early look at each position:
OFFENSIVE LINE
The Good News: Jay Leeuwenburg is ranked the best center in the country,
and of the newcomers, three were prep All-Americans.
The Bad News: Besides Leeuwenburg, the other 15 on the depth chart have
appeared in 17 total games on the offensive line.
Watch This Guy: Redshirt Derek West from Pomona High School (in Denver) has
put on 50 pounds since his senior year and should be the first freshman to
start on the offensive line since Joe Garten in 1987.
QUARTERBACK
The Good News: Two-time all-Big Eight QB Darian Hagan, coming off serious
knee surgery, is proclaiming, "I can do everything."
The Bad News: The rare injury to Hagan's patellar tendon wasn't caused by
contact. Meaning, what happens when he first tests it on a full-tilt cut
upfield?
Watch This Guy: Sophomore Vance Joseph may be better than his brother
Mickey at Nebraska.
RUNNING BACK
The Good News: Sophomore James Hill, a prep All-American from Colorado
Springs, is set at fullback and averaged more than 6 yards a carry in
mop-up duty last year.
The Bad News: Sophomore Chuck Snowden, probably CU's most promising runner,
is still hampered by an Achilles problem that may last all year.
Watch This Guy: Redshirt freshman Erik Mitchell runs a 4.3 40.
RECEIVERS
The Good News: Rico Smith didn't start, but he played in all 12 games and
led Colorado with 29 yards per catch.
The Bad News: Who will ever see the ball if Hagan isn't protected?
Watch This Guy: Mark Henry, a walk-on from Fleming (CO) and eight-man
football, should start at wingback.
DEFENSIVE LINE
The Good News: The Sporting News picked senior nose tackle Joel Steed as
preseason Big Eight defensive player of the year.
The Bad News: With the loss of sack artists Alfred Williams and Kanavis
McGhee at linebacker and Garry Howe at tackle, this talented line will have
to become sack happy in a hurry.
Watch This Guy: On a team featuring the Butkus Award winner and the Outland
Trophy runnerup last year, sophomore nose tackle Jeff Brunner was Colorado's
strongest player.
LINEBACKER
The Good News: Colorado's top tacklers - Greg Biekert and Chad Brown -
return on the inside. Biekert even led the league.
The Bad News: On the outside are a converted quarterback, a converted
basketball player and a converted Oregon State Beaver.
Watch This Guy: Junior-college transfer Sam Rogers - if he's eligible -
had 21 sacks at West Los Angeles J.C. last year and 33 in two years.
SECONDARY
The Good News: The deepest area on the team and maybe the best in coach
Bill McCartney's 10 years.
The Bad News: Opponents hit 54 percent last year - even with 41 sacks -
so there was a leak somewhere.
Watch This Guy: Junior Ronnie bradford blocked an extra point in the
Orange Bowl and about a half-dozen kicks in the spring. He'll finally
get to show his speed at cornerback.
SPECIAL TEAMS
The Good News: Place-kicker Jim Harper is back after making 14 of 22
field-goal attempts.
The Bad News: Will fighting Pat Blottiaux for the job shake Harper's
confidence?
Watch This Guy: CU's staff may meet Canadian Mitch Berger at the customs
window to make sure he gets through and saves a scary punting situation.
One note: McCartney announced yesterday that Chad Brown has been moved to
outside linbacker.
Joe
|
18.152 | I'm not making this up, really | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:01 | 4 |
| McCartney announced yesterday that Hagan (Yes, Darian Hagan) will
return punts this season if he can beat out the competition at that
position.
|
18.153 | Where's this guy's haid? | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:13 | 10 |
| re:-1
Did McCartney mention how good the backup QB is? That's got to be
the most stupid thing he's done. I think CU would be better off
with marginal punt returns. The paper said that Hagan's injury
could suddenly reoccur--even without contact. (It was originally
caused without contact) Why take unnecessary chances with the
starting QB?
Cowboy
|
18.154 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 10:55 | 17 |
|
Mac is doing it so that DH can show his wares to the
pro scouts (read "he won't make it as an nfl qb"). He
feels he owes it to him. I don't think it'll happen.
They have some real burners that return punts and I
doubt DH will beat them out. In that same article, it
was reported that a couple of baseball organizations are
very high on him (Toronto and Seattle) as a shortstop. If
I were him, I'd quit football and have a go at baseball.
He'll enjoy a much longer career (if he's as good those
two teams think).
Of course there is always the Canadien Football League....
Don't they have some rule up there about no qb can be
taller than Doug Flutie? :^)
Claybone
|
18.155 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Wed Aug 21 1991 11:25 | 10 |
| Yeah, there's not much need for option QBs in the pros. That's
too bad (too bad for their future) that so many potentially good
RBs have taken the QB jobs at schools like OU and now CU.
Really, I'm surprised that many of them haven't found a spot
as a pro RB. Maybe, since they've usually been kinda small has
something to do with it.
I'm ready for some good BIG-8 games.
Cowboy
|
18.156 | How will McArtney feel if Hagen goes down on a punt return... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Wed Aug 21 1991 12:27 | 24 |
| I agree with Cowboy on this one. Why risk Hagen? He is a proven QB who has
experience, field generalship, and good enough thowing ability for a withbone
type of team. He is extremely valuable to the team and, IMHO, they need his
leadership to have a chance in the Big-8.
I also agree that if he has a decent shot at baseball (Been Bely Bely gud to me)
he should give up football ideas for pro ball and try baseball.
Canadian footall is an alternative. Turner Gill (Husker QB '81, '82, '83 -
Huskers of '83, the best that will ever be) did very well in that league untill
he suffered several concussions (spelling?) and the doctors told him to quit.
But he was an option QB who happened to be a very good passer. Nebraska/Osborne
dident use him to his full extent. If they had I maintain that NU would have
been back to back Natl Champs in '82 and '83. Oh, but I'm rambling now.
Anyway, Hagen's leg could go again any time and he should not be returning
punts. CU shold have enough talent so he dosent have to do it.
I've been trying to get ahold of the guys in Omaha Field Service for Husker
camp news but those guys are always out try'in to fix those vax's, and they
almost never read their mail. Of course the Colorado media gives no news but
CU and Donko's. When I get some news I'll let ya know.
Bugeater Marty
|
18.157 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 21 1991 12:28 | 85 |
|
The Big Eight Skywriters Tour began yesterday in Columbia. I'll put in
the writeup of each team over the next week or so. There's a quick
summary of each team followed by an article on that team. This is all
being taken from The Denver Post. Enjoy.
MISSOURI/At a Glance
Last Year: 4-7, 2-5 (tie sixth)
Lettermen, starters back: 47, 5 offense, 7 defense.
Strength: Offensive line. Four starters return after giving up only 20 sacks
in 424 pass plays. And they're huge, averaging 294 pounds.
Weakness: Linebackers. They were so bad, coach Bob Stull switched from a
3-4 to 4-3 then fired defensive coordinator at season's end. They're so
slow, Stull moved in a strong safety.
Key date: Oct. 12 at Colorado. Fifth-down loss last year sent Missouri in
the tank. Emotional rematch will test Tigers' alleged new speed against
option.
Program needs: Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf. Maybe he could instill discipline
and improve image of a program going nowhere fast.
Quotable quote: Stull - "We have some talented guys in the secondary, but
you just don't know. It's like your daughter coming home at 4 o'clock in
the morning carrying a Gideon Bible. You just don't know."
'Stull grabs Missouri's off-field woes by the tail', by John Henderson
Columbia, MO - Gen. George Patton. Joe Montana. Even God. Their actions
have all been used by college-football coaches to teach their charges. At
Missouri this year, coach Bob Stull used someone else. Pee Wee Herman.
The sympathy Missouri reaped from its fifth-down loss to Colorado was
replaced by embarrassment from an offseason police blotter as thick as the
Mizzou playbook.
Missouri players were arrested nine times in six separate incidents,
ranging from drunk driving to date rape. Stull, in his third year, had a
unique speech planned when his players arrived for fall camp.
"Whether you're a politician or Pee Wee Herman, it don't make a
difference," Stull told his team. "When Pee Wee Herman was arrested (for
indecent exposure in an adult movie theater), they made a plea bargain to do
community service. He could've raised a million dollars for the city. But
to them that wasn't a plea at all.
"You must realize, if you get in trouble, you'll get the max. Not the
minimum. The max."
The courts aren't through sentencing, but Stull is. Gone are starters in
defensive end Curtis Roberts (shoplifting) and tight end David Frisch
(burglary) plus reserves in tailback Mark Jackson (assault and burglary),
linebacker Louis Thomas (rape), linebacker Tony Cooper (assault) and
linebacker Lance Noel (drunk driving).
Two others, fullback Michael Washington (burglary) and running back Tony
Van Zant (assault), were allowed back on the team after pleading guilty to
lesser charges.
Oh, yes, prep All-America recruit Reagan Allen was arrested for drunk
driving Aug. 9 before he ever set foot on campus.
"There are two things we can't do for players," Stull said. "We can't
study for them, and we can't execute proper behavior. If they don't study or
behave in a proper manner, they'll pay the consequences."
So is Stull. The only arrested players he recruited were Jackson and
Washington. The others arrived under previous coach Woody Widenhofer.
But Stull is taking the heat in a sports-crazed town that's up to its
mortat boards in basketball probation and football scandal.
Stull, with one hand, points his finger elsewhere. Yesterday, he pointed
it at the media, which arrived here for the first stop on the Big Eight
Skywriters' Tour.
"I was at the CFA meeting, and I was talking to a lot of coaches and not
one didn't go through this at one time or another," he said. "Nebraska had
its time; Oklahoma had its time, and Colorado had its time. You can go right
down the line here and won't find one of you guys who hasn't written a
similar story."
But with the other hand, he pointed the finger at himself and took action.
During this season, bars are banned.
That's apparently a good place to start.
"Guys were so disgusted with the off-season," he said, "they accepted it."
Stull isn't stopping there. In the past, he has encouraged recruiters to
discuss recruits with counselors and principals. Now, he's requiring it.
"From now on," Stull said, "we're making sure we see everyone and see a
different perspective than the coach."
So far, that perspective in Missouri is pretty ugly.
|
18.158 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Wed Aug 21 1991 13:03 | 8 |
| Stull's done a good job and may have the worst ahead of him.
But, then again, he may find it easier to recruit good players
that want to play football.
Joe, where'd you find the Missouri info? The Post? I haven't
seen much BIG-8 in the GT. (Not surprising)
Cowboy
|
18.159 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 21 1991 13:06 | 85 |
|
KANSAS/At a glance
Last year; 3-7-1, 2-4-1 (tie fourth).
Lettermen, starters back: 49, 10 offense, 8 defense.
Strength: Offensive line. Kansas was 30th in nation in rushing despite
injuries in its backfield.
Weakness: Secondary. Opponents threw for 2,361 yards and 14 touchdowns
last year. And heads up. All four starters return.
Key date: Sept. 7 at Toledo. Win in opener could mean a 5-1 start, best
since 1968.
Program needs: A star. Tailback Tony Sands wears a tuxedo, but when your
best player is a kicker from Berlin, you'd better get into a bowl game.
It's the only way you'll get on TV.
Quotable quote: Coach Glen Mason on his 1-10 first season in 1988 - "It's
kind of like going in for an operation and the doctor says dying on the
operating table isn't the worst thing that can happen to you. You could
survive and go on."
'Jayhawks aiming for a bowl ring', by John Henderson
Lawrence, Kan. - With apologies to Nike, Bo Jackson and anyone equating
Kansas football with vaudeville, here's the Jayhawks' motto on their T-shirts
this fall: "It's a Ring Thing."
OK, it's a cheap rip-off of Jackson's Nike ad. And knowing the Jayhawks'
history, it should stand for the ringing they've heard when they had their
helmets bashed in every week for 10 years.
But brace yourself. Kansas, without a bowl bid since 1981, with one
winning record in 15 years and employer of more field bosses than the New
York Yankees, is talking bowl rings.
"We heard the same jokes Colorado heard seven years ago," quarterback Chip
Hilleary said. "To be honest, I haven't heard a joke in over a year."
Hilleary isn't quite sure when the laughter stopped. Maybe last year when
Kansas outgained Oklahoma 223-43 in the second half. Or when Kansas beat
Oklahoma State for the first time since 1972. Or when Kansas gained 410
yards against Nebraska.
Whatever, no one's laughing now. In the preseason media poll, Kansas was
picked fourth.
"I feel we're there," said tailback Tony Sands, one of 10 starters back on
offense. "The offensive line, the defensive line, the defensive backs, the
running backs, we feel in our heart we can go to a bowl game. We can play
versus the big boys."
They could play in a bowl game because they won't play many big boys.
Kansas dropped Miami(FL), and added Toledo as the opener.
Then comes Tulsa, New Mexico State, Virginia and Kansas State.
Realistically, Kansas could be 4-1 heading into its homecoming game against
Iowa State.
Do you believe? Folks here do. Kansas has sold 17,500 season tickets and
could reach the 20,000 mark for only the second time since 1978.
"Let's face it, Kansas football was a joke," said fourth-year coach Glen
Mason, hired as Kansas' fifth coach in 10 years. "Everybody thought it was
a laughing matter but me. Picked fourth is an indication that the perception
has a chance to change. Whether it does is up to us."
Besides a handpicked schedule, Kansas finally has talent. "We should
do well," Mason told the Skywriters yesterday. "If we don't, you'll be on
my tail, and you should be."
Sands is 728 yards from Laverne Smith's school rushing mark of 3,074 and
Hilleary was third in the Big Eight with 1,730 passing yards.
Four offensive linemen return, and defensive lineman Gilbert Brown may be
the most agile 300-pounder in the league. The defense, however, could
still be a disaster.
"Our players are bigger, faster and stronger," Mason said, "and there are
more of them."
No longer can Kansas bus to practice in a VW van. Mason's near sweep of
in-state prospects has helped boost scholarship palyers from 51 two years
ago to 91.
He said after his first team meeting in '89, "I thought I was being
boycotted," but now it's standing room only.
"I feel like a football coach again," he said. "I don't feel like in
previous seasons wondering if we can survive an 11-game season."
And the players feel like players again. Putting Sands, at 5-foot-6 and
175 pounds, behind some fo Kansas' former lines was like putting a cat on
I-70.
"Before, I'd kind of open one eye and try to find the hole," Sands said.
"Now, I open them big so I make sure I make the right cut."
Everyone else in Kansas has their eyes wide open, too.
|
18.160 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:25 | 82 |
|
KANSAS STATE/At a glance
Last year: 5-6, 2-5 (tie sixth)
Lettermen, starters back: 50, 9 offense, 10 defense.
Strength: Wide receivers. Seniors Michael Smith and Frank Hernandez
became first two junior teammates in Big Eight history to have 1,000
career receiving yards.
Weakness: Running back. Of the first three, Kitt Rawlings has 77 career
yards, Vili Sanft has played 20 football games in his life and Eric
gallon hasn't played running back since 1985.
Key game: Oct. 12 vs. Kansas. If enough Wildcats are healthy after
Washington game two weeks prior, they can match progress reports against
in-state rival.
Program needs: An ad campaign. Despite second-best record in 21 years,
Kansas State's turnstile count last season only averaged about 15,000
a game.
Quotable quote: Coach Bill Snyder on being picked last again by the media -
"People are a creature of habit. In 120 years have we ever not been picked
last? When they hand out those ballots, we're probably already typed in."
'Wildcats happy with any victory', by John Henderson
MANHATTAN, Kan. - College football schedules, theoretically, are set
in concrete. At Kansas State, they're set in hot-air balloons.
Let go of Florida. Put in Western Illinois. Let go of Wyoming. Put
in New Mexico State.
Kansas State's 5-6 record last year represented more wins than its
last five years combined (4-50-1). That's because of a good coach, a good
passing attack and a great invention called "scheduling gymnastics."
The Wildcats beat Division I-AA Western Illinois plus New Mexico State
and New Mexico last year. This season, Kansas State plays I-AA schools
in Indiana State and Idaho State, then Northern Illinois.
At Kansas State, however, you won't find anyone blushing. "When it's
all over," coach bill Snyder said, "no one remembers who you beat."
The Wildcats, at least, are honest. This is a school with one winning
season the last 20 years, one bowl game in its 95-year history and a
30-game winless streak that ended just two years ago.
What to do? Easy. If you can't beat 'em, drop 'em.
In the last year, Kansas State has dropped Florida, Ohio State,
Wisconsin and Wyoming and replaced them with, respectively, Western
Illinois, Indiana State, Idaho State and New Mexico State.
"We're everybody's homecoming team," said Jim Epps, Kansas State's senior
associate athletic director who did the scheduling as interim athletic
director.
Epps trashed the schedules arranged by former athletic director Larry
Travis, who tried to erase the department's growing debt with what's known
as "body-bag" games. Every discarded school paid a guarantee of up to
$350,000. A home game with, say, Idaho State earns about $130,000.
"We took the approach that, 'God, we need the money but more important,
we need the potential for a win,'" Epps said. "When you're down so long,
the importance of a win to fans far exceeds the check in the bank account.
"We will not be sacrificial lambs for a paycheck.
The marshmallows will keep coming, too. Future schedules include
Indiana State, Boston University, Rice, Ohio University, Cincinnati and
New Mexico State twice.
Of course, these were teams that toasted Kansas State in the past. So
as the Wildcats improve, their schedules won't. Synder was all in favor
of replacing Washington.
"I tried as humanly possible," Snyder said. "I told (Washington coach)
Don James we wouldn't show up. He needed to outfit two teams in separate-
colored jerseys and play each other so fans could see a game."
The juggling doesn't stop at non-conference. Without the big paydays,
Kansas State has a $5 million debt. To help reduce that, the Wildcats
will play at Oklahoma this year for the fourth straight season. The
difference in playing at Norman or in Manhattan, Epps said, is about
$100,000. Kansas State may try approaching Nebraska with a similar offer.
"I'd rather earn money by taking a ballgame to Lincoln or Norman than
schedule another one fo those type teams on the road (in nonleague),"
Snyder said. However, the athletic department never consulted the players
on this one.
"I'm tired of playing Oklahoma at Oklahoma," senior wide receiver
Michael Smith said. "It's time we play Oklahoma here."
|
18.161 | Atleast they have a sense of humor... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Thu Aug 22 1991 14:53 | 1 |
| Thanks for -1! I'd almost forgotten how bad KSU is.
|
18.162 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:42 | 6 |
|
You gotta be kidding! Idaho St.? Friggin' Mesa St. (a
perrenial NAIA Div. 1 power) plays them this year. That's
right, NAIA! Sheesh.
Claybone
|
18.163 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 23 1991 12:40 | 82 |
|
OKLAHOMA STATE/At a glance
Last year: 4-7, 2-5 (tie sixth)
Lettermen, starters returning: 30, 8 offense, 9 defense.
Strength: Offensive line. Four starters return, and The Sporting News
ranked it 10th best in nation.
Weakness: Kickers. On two-deep, three of the four are freshmen and
senior punter Barry Vincent's a walk-on.
Key date: Oct. 5 at Miami (FL). Losing 15 scholarships over three years
left Cowboys thin in places. They can't afford leaving body parts on the
Orange Bowl turf. The next week - Nebraska.
Program needs: Clean bill of health. Three years of sanctions end this
year. Maybe then, Pat Jones can work his coaching magic again.
Quotable quote: Jones comparing Oklahoma State's patient fans with
Oklahoma's impatient ones - "(OU fans) saw Bud (Wilkinson) win 47 in a row.
They saw (Barry) Switzer win so many. I don't mean to say this
egotistically, but these people here saw my teams win 10. No one else has
done that here. When Bud won 47 in a row, Oklahoma State wasn't even in
the league."
'Cowboys still loaded at tailback', by John Henderson
STILLWATER, Okla. - At Oklahoma State, probabation may come and go and
losing records may come and go, but all-world tailbacks just keep coming
and coming.
Here at ol' Tailback U., the Big Eight Skywriters yesterday were introduced
to the latest model on the Cowboys' conveyer belt.
Rafael Denson hasn't played a down for Oklahoma State. In fact, he's
listed third on the depth chart - even behind another freshman.
But in only three days of contact drills, Denson has made Cowboys coach
Pat Jones break the coaches' code on freshman hype.
"He's a take-your-breath-away guy," Jones said. "Every day I saw (Barry)
Sanders and (Thurman) Thomas do that stuff. This is the first time I've
seen it with this guy."
Getting Jones to gasp over a tailback is like Michelangelo gasping over
a statue. Jones coached NCAA rushing champs in Barry Sanders (1988) and
Gerald Hudson (1990), a Heisman Trophy winner in Sanders ('88) and
another All-America tailback in Thomas (1985, '87).
Last year, Oklahoma State became the first school to have players lead
the NCAA (Hudson), AFC (Thomas) and NFC (Sanders) in rushing in the same
season.
When Jones talks about tailbacks, people take notes, especially when
he compares Denson with those three. "I'll leave Hudson out," Jones said.
"He probably compares to the other two."
Signing Denson was the first step back for a school that's finishing
three years of NCAA sanctions. OSU's coming off two 4-7 years and can't
play in a bowl game this season. But next year, it starts over and
Oklahoma State has the star to do it.
Denson, 5-foot-8 and 165 pounds, rushed for 2,116 yards and 37
touchdowns in leading Ardmore High to the Oklahoma state 4A title. He was
an All-America and state player of the year.
He's a three-time state 100-meter champ with a state-record 10.3. He
has clocked 4.26 in the 40. "No one's as fast as Denson," Jones said.
"No one."
That's nothing. Jones should have seen Denson as a real rookie. In
sixth grade, he gained 4,000 yards and scored 60 touchdowns.
However, he hasn't grown much since then. That's why Oklahoma and
Texas wanted him at wide receiver. That made his decision easier.
"At first I didn't want to come here because of the probation," Denson
said. "But I came here and talked to the coaches and players. OSU is the
best place to go for tailbacks."
He doesn't look strong, but his speed means he doesn't have to be real
durable. "I've never been hurt before," Denson said. "I haven't been hit
real hard since I've been here - that is until (defensive players) read
that."
All this ink, however, may end up lining Denson's bird cage. He may
not even start. He's listed behind junior Kelly tancy and redshirt freshman
Russell Berrien. Two highly touted freshmen from Fort Lauderdale, Fla.,
L.G. Thompson and Mark Williams, are right on Denson's tail.
But not one Cowboys tailback has gained a college yard. And Denson is
so good, Jones may move Yancy to fullback and use him with Denson. "It they
stay healthy," Jones said, "we'll have some options."
|
18.164 | Maybe they're not all that bad?!? | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Fri Aug 23 1991 15:44 | 19 |
| re: -1
You made my day Joe! Finally, something positive has been
written about OSU's team. They've been picked to take the
cellar by several mags but atleast they should be starting
their rebuilding process this year.
I didn't realize the Cowboys were that deep at RB--if you
can call inexperience 'depth'. Denson has more real speed
than I thought too. With their good line this year OSU
may be able to control the ball some--if these RBs can
pan out. I don't know who is QBing this year. (No one
knew who was QBing last year either.) Maybe they can
have some kid just stand there and hand the ball off and
march down field.
Heeyyy, I caint wait til Sept 7
Cowboy
|
18.165 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 23 1991 16:30 | 19 |
| Cowboy, glad you're enjoyin' the reports. BTW, they're coming from The
Denver Post. They've had 1 team per day, starting this past Tuesday.
The Big Eight title race this year should be real interesting, and the
champ may end up with 1 conference loss. OU is the favorite, but I
wouldn't be at all surprised if CU or NU won it. CU has alot of talent
ready to step in, they're just inexperienced. And I think NU is picked
2nd or 3rd by most just because of how they finished last season, but
they have plenty of talent. If they knock off highly-touted
Washington early in the season they will suddenly become the conference
favorite.
Even though the Big Eight race will come down to the big 3, it's
definitely a conference where the bottom teams are getting better.
Colorado's opener against Wyoming will be on ESPN at 5:30 pm MDT.
Joe
|
18.166 | OU pre-season Big 8 favorite? Let's back it up... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Aug 23 1991 16:41 | 18 |
|
> And I think NU is picked
> 2nd or 3rd by most just because of how they finished last season, but
> they have plenty of talent. If they knock off highly-touted
> Washington early in the season they will suddenly become the conference
> favorite.
I'd say the chances of this occurring increased markedly when WU's
stud QB Brunelle got nailed in practice and will reportedly be out
the first half of the season. Before that I didn't hold out much
hope for the Huskers...
I hope something similar does not befall Cale Gundy again this
season. The Sooners have high expectations riding heavily on his
shoulders this season.
glenn
|
18.167 | Ramblings on Denson/Thomas/Sanders | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Fri Aug 23 1991 16:52 | 18 |
| re: Raphael Denson
The article, back a couple, was comparing OSU's latest/greatest RB
to Sanders and Thomas and reminded me of another comparison. Coaches
at OU and Texas didn't want to use Denson as a RB but as a WR instead.
Hopefully, he will fare as well as Sanders and Thomas did at OSU.
When Sanders was shopping football colleges there were few that were
even interested in him and the ones that were (KU, OU, 1 or 2 others)
none would use him as a RB--he was too small for big-time college ball.
OU wanted him to play DB, for example. It seems that Thomas had the
same problem 2 years before. Denson sounds like he has the speed
that Thomas didn't ever have but Sanders did. Hopefully, he will
have the running intelligence and eyes of Thomas. If he doesn't
then he won't ever need the quickness/strength of Sanders. If he
happens to have the sum of both Thomas and Sanders then Denson will
be incredible to watch run.
Cowboy
|
18.168 | OU should be tough.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Fri Aug 23 1991 17:45 | 14 |
| > I hope something similar does not befall Cale Gundy again this
> season. The Sooners have high expectations riding heavily on his
> shoulders this season.
> glenn
Perhaps the only thing that will save the rest of the BIG-8 from
OU this year is that a healthy Cale Gundy (dirty rotten trader)
won't ever have the QB instincts that his little brother had (but
Cale has the athletic abilities). If OU stays healthy they
ought to be strong.
|
18.169 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 26 1991 19:04 | 85 |
|
OKLAHOMA/At a glance
Last year: 8-3, 5-2 (tie second)
Lettermen: Starters back: 44, 6 offense, 8 defense.
Strength: Quarterback. Sophomore Cale Gundy is Big Eight's next star
passer.
Weakness: Defensive line. It's a little thin, but nose guard Corey Mayfield
had seven sacks, so it can't be too bad.
Key date: Oct. 12 vs. Texas in Dallas. Oklahoma should win Big Eight title,
but win over Texas could put it in national-title picture.
Program needs: A demolition ball to Wilkinson Complex. OU's athletic dorm,
the scene of past football crimes, now has a security guard from midnight to
5 a.m. and visitors must sign in, leave ID and exit by a certain time. Yeah,
these athletes are blending into the rest of campus.
Quotable quote: Gundy on the Texas rivalry - "People don't understand how
big that game is until they've been in it. After the game, you get beat
and one of the worst things about it is your car's parked so far away and
you have to walk all the way through the (state) fair and carrying an
Oklahoma bag. And everybody's going 'Longhorns! Longhorns!'"
'OU eyes fruits of victory: Orange', by John Henderson
NORMAN, Okla. - It finally happened. No one thought it possible, but it
finally happened. On Aug. 23, 1991, at 12:21 p.m. (CDT), in the Big Red
room of Owen Field, Oklahoma coach Gary Lynn Gibbs told a joke.
The quiet, homogenized - well, why beat around the bush - boring coach
hired in 1989 to cleanse OU's image actually laughed.
Addressing the Big Eight Skywriters' Tour, Gibbs held up two oranges he
found next to his podium and asked, "Is this a prop?"
OK, so he's not ready for the Carson show. It still indicated things
are lightening up around Norman these days, and for good reason.
Two years of NCAA sanctions are behind the Sooners, and the Orange Bowl
(get it?) is in front of them.
"The whole talk is the Orange Bowl," sophomore quarterback Cale Gundy
said. "It's amazing. After practice we have a break and we go, 'One. Two.
Three. Orange Bowl!' We're looking at every game as if it's for the
national championship."
They'll hear that in Boulder. If Colorado is to win its third straight
Big Eight title, this is the preseason favorite it must beat. It won't be
easy.
The Sooners, frankly, are loaded. To wit:
- Gundy threw for 904 yards last year and didn't start until his seventh
game.
- The top four tailbacks return, plus Mike Gaddis, who was second in the
nation in rushing with 829 yards before blowing out his knee in the sixth game
of 1989. He was a clean bill of health and scored twice in the spring game.
- The team's top two tacklers, Chris Wilson and Darnell Walker, return at
linebacker.
- A secondary that had 20 interceptions and was 17th nationally against
the pass returns intact.
"No bowl, no TV, the incidents in Wilkinson (athletic) dorm, I think all
that's off our shoulders," Gaddis said. "Now, we can focus on football."
The steam behind the Sooner bandwagon started blowing at the end of last
season. Oklahoma stopped folding, spindling and mutilating and pounded
Missouri 35-10, Kansas State 34-7 and Nebraska 45-10.
The voting media, at least, thinks OU will pick up where it left off.
"Good, I hope you're right," gibbs said. "You say you're awfully smart. I'd
rather be the consensus preseason pick than be picked third, fourth, or fifth."
"I think a lot of people are writing Colorado off. They'll be better than
people think."
Oklahoma's a lot better than people thought. Ususally, programs emerge
from probation looking like a shipwreck. Oklahoma looks like a brand new
yacht.
What did it do? First, Gibbs had young teams his last two years. Second,
limited to only 18 scholarships lst year, Gibbs has signed nine prep All-
Americans the last two signing periods.
"The key to this football team is 23 seniors," he said. "The last couple
of years, we've had 11, 12, 13 seniors and within that group we didn't have
11, 12, 13 starters."
The player to watch is Gundy. He popped off about a game plan that iced
his arm in a 14-13 loss to Texas. He has learned, but so has Gibbs. "We're
hoping he'll throw 20 to 25 times a game," Gibbs said. "I hope he throws for
2,000 yards. It sounds good to me."
Sounds good to Gundy, too. "My goal is to have 2,000 to 2,500 yards,"
he said. "But if we rush for 400-500 yards a game, why pass the ball?"
|
18.170 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:16 | 90 |
|
COLORADO/At a glance
Last year: 11-1-1, 7-0 (first)
Lettermen, starters back: 26, 3 offense, 6 defense.
Strength: Secondary. Added speed in safety Eric Hamilton and cornerback
Ronnie Bradford makes this the best secondary in coach Bill McCartney's
10 years.
Weakness: Offensive line. Three sophomores or a freshman could start.
Key date: Oct. 19 at Oklahoma. Big Eight title may be decided in second
week of league play.
Program needs: More money. Cutting $200,000 from the budget after winning
a national title may show CU has football in perspective, but angering the
coach who won the title is no way to say thank you.
Quotable quote: McCartney, asked if he follows the wire-service polls -
"No. I used to follow the coaches' poll."
'CU tries to defend crown; McCartney hopes for lasting success', by John
Henderson
BOULDER - When Bill McCartney was an assistant at Michigan, Wolverines
coach Bo Schembechler had a poster from the Cadillac manufacturers on a wall.
It read, "When you're on top, everybody wants a piece of you."
It was dated 1915. However, it could have been dated 1990 with McCartney's
name next to it. He muttered those words every time his Colorado Buffaloes
took the field to defend its Big Eight Conference title.
In 1991, McCartney won't have to say a thing. This year, those words are
as huge as the ones on the banner that reads, "Colorado - National Champions."
Defending a Big Eight title is one thing. Defending a national title is
another. Colorado will defend its crown with only nine returning starters
and a rap in some circles as the luckiest team in the country.
Opponents always are hungrier against a national champion, but in
Colorado's case, foes already have their tables set. "I've learned,"
McCartney said, "that it's harder to defend a title than win it the first
time."
The Buffaloes learned a lot in defending their 1989 Big Eight title that
they can apply to this year. Some say Colorado will fall off its throne
like a load of bricks. McCartney swears that won't happen.
"I don't want to be a team making temporary appearances," he said. "We
want to be a team that establishes itself in the '90's as a legitimate,
good football program."
"A year ago is history. All the things that happened, all the breaks we
got, all the good fortune, I don't deny any of it. I feel very fortunate
to have it end up the way it did.
"But we're going to use it as a springboard to the future. It's not
something to relax on."
McCartney talked all year about how the word "Colorado" was circled on 11
opponents' calendars. The reasoning was obvious, but you wonder if the
Buffaloes listened.
Despite goint 11-1-1, Colorado trailed in 10 games. Two games were won
on the final play.
"The big thing they can learn is to respect teams in the lower division,"
offensive coordinator Gary Barnett said. "Teams in the lower division made
you play your butt off. that's what I hope will rub off on the younger
players."
It definitely rubbed off on the older ones.
"We were picked so high in preseason," senior center Jay Leeuwenburg
said. "We had unbelievable talent. We had 10 guys (actually nine) go in
the draft. That's insane. We had a real difficult schedule., and we knew
that going into the year. Yet in 10 games, we were behind. For those
returning, I think that will really help us."
Said quarterback Darian Hagan, "Basically, we developed a will to win.
We were behind in 10 games, but we won them all (actually eight). That was
the reason we won the national title."
They'd better be ready, because their opponents are. Their incentives
are huge. Stanford, CU's first road opponent, lost on the final play of the
game last year and is inviting all its former greats to the Sept. 28 home
game.
Missouri, Colorado's first league opponent, wants to show the nation it
was cheated in last year's fifth-down fiasco. Oklahoma, the league favorite,
sees a victory over CU as its biggest step to the national title and Nebraska
has lost two straight to CU for the first time in 29 years.
"I thought Illinois, Texas and Washington played us much tougher (last
year) than the year before," McCartney said. "Yet we were probably a
stronger team."
Colorado is also slowly climbing from the wanna-be stage to the consistency
of football factories that hold court for decades.
Can a team basking in its most success in history stay hungry after its
first national title?
"This is a new bunch," McCartney said. "These guys have got to establish
themselves. I don't sense any apathy or indifference. I sense hunger and
thirst."
|
18.171 | like to see a rematch,tho | CTHQ1::LEARY | | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:44 | 20 |
| Joe,
I hope CU maintains its excellence for the 90's and beyond. No offense
to other Big 8 schools, but I would not like to see the conference
revert back to the " Big Two"
Hmm,I wonder is Bo is seething because one of his asst. did something
he could never do. Win the national championship. Well, he could be
doubly seething if Moeller does it this year. The Wolverines gotta
be considered the first or second choice for the mythical. Cain't
you tell that I really like Bo!!
MikeL
FWIW, I went to the Orange Bowl game last year, CU-ND, and I endorsed
the Buffs' claim to #1. Sure Ga. Tech had a great year but their case
was weakened because they never were rated #1 during the year. CU was
rated #1 for at least 4-5 weeks and to quote Bo "when you're on top
everyone wants a piece of you" CU sure felt that "on-top" pressure.
|
18.172 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:19 | 92 |
|
NEBRASKA/At a glance
Last year: 9-3, 5-2 (tie second).
Lettermen, starters returning: 55, 8 offense, 5 defense.
Strength: Running back. Nebraska finished second in nation in rushing
(340.0 yards per game) and returns everyone but leading rusher Leodis
Flowers, who was dropped from the team. Junior Scott Baldwin and
sophomore Derek Brown will quickly make Flowers a memory.
Weakness: Quarterback. No. 1 Mickey Joseph can't throw past 30 yards, No.
2 Tom Haase is a walk-on and No. 3 Keithen McCant has thrown three varsity
passes.
Key date: Sept. 21 vs. Washington. Fourth-ranked Huskies could be No. 1
by then, a good chance to show spoiled Huskers fans that Nebraska isn't
slipping.
Program needs: Emotion. Its town is boring. Its coach is boring. Its
offense is boring. Some excitement may keep these guys from falling asleep
Jan. 1 every year.
Quotable quote: Quarterback Mickey Joseph on younger brother Vance, Colorado's
backup quarterback - "I'll never touch his arm. He has the special arm in
our family - so far. We have a little one (Samuel) who has a better arm
than both of us. He's 8."
'Footballs, grousing in the air', by John Henderson
LINCOLN, Neb. - The plaques of Nebraska's 68 All Americans hang in
Memorial Coliseum like ghosts of the monster coach Tom Osborne created.
These days, what could cover more wall space are the weekly letters to the
editor, half of which want Osborne hanging alongside the plaques. But with
a rope, not a nail.
That, of course, doesn't include the mass of letters his secretary tosses
because they're too crude to start the day. Or the unsold tickets for
students who bought their lowest total in 10 years.
"(Iowa State coach) Jim Walden says...that when people get a national
championship mentality," Osborne said, "you've got problems."
Nebraska, folks, has problems.
The football factory is no longer meeting quota. Forget a record 22
straight bowl games, 22 straight seasons of nine wins or more, Osborne's
177-41-2 record, five league titles and six national rushing crowns.
This is what the Nebraska fan remembers:
- Three straight losses in bowl games by a combined score of 109-41.
- A 4-8 record in the last 12 games against ranked teams, including
five straight losses.
- Beating Oklahoma and winning a bowl game in the same season once
in 18 years.
- Finishing out of the top 20 (24th) last year for the first time in
21 years.
- The lowest preseason ranking (15th) since 1977.
Osborne, 54, is entering his 19th season. Some say after his 20th
season, he would look just dandy in the athletic director's chair when
Bob Devaney retires in January 1993.
Osborne isn't moving. Behind his American Gothic face and soft voice
are some tough words.
"We have lost four straight bowl games, but we haven't played Humpty
Dumpty, either," he said. "We played Miami in the Orange Bowl. Everybody
should try that once in a lifetime. We played Florida State a couple of
times. I don't think Georgia Tech is an overwhelming football team, but
I'd like our odds if we were playing for a national championship."
Nebraska's problem has been an innate ability to get shot down once, then
play dead the rest of the year. After Colorado scored 27 points in the
fourth quarter to win 27-12 last year, Nebraska lost its last two games to
Oklahoma 45-10 and Georgia Tech 45-21.
"Going up to the Colorado game, there was a lot of sentiment of, 'You
look OK, but you haven't done anything yet,'" Osborne said. "We simply
lost our focus."
To combat this, Nebraska has made more changes than any team in the
Big Eight. It has formed a Unity Council in which players meet weekly
with an Omaha psychologist and various coaches to help prevent the bickering
from last year.
It also has stepped up its weight program. Osborne wanted leaner linemen
to catch up with Miami and Florida State. However, it backfired. His
offensive line averaged a milquetoast 280 pounds on the bench press and it
showed.
The linemen's average has improved 50 pounds on the bench press and 20
pounds on the scales.
But the biggest change is the offense. Osborne said Mickey Joseph, who
leads a tight quarterback race, will throw about 20 times a game after
throwing only 96 times in 26 previous games. Maybe that will offset a
defense that lost seven starters, six to the NFL.
Nebraska hasn't thrown 20 times a game since 1976. Joseph, a 43-percent
passer who admits he has a weak arm, can't wait. "Maybe," he said, "it'll
get people off our backs."
|
18.173 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Tue Aug 27 1991 14:33 | 31 |
| > Weakness: Quarterback. No. 1 Mickey Joseph can't throw past 30 yards, No.
> 2 Tom Haase is a walk-on and No. 3 Keithen McCant has thrown three varsity
> passes.
> Quotable quote: Quarterback Mickey Joseph on younger brother Vance, Colorado's
> backup quarterback - "I'll never touch his arm. He has the special arm in
> our family - so far. We have a little one (Samuel) who has a better arm
> than both of us. He's 8."
> Nebraska hasn't thrown 20 times a game since 1976. Joseph, a 43-percent
> passer who admits he has a weak arm, can't wait. "Maybe," he said, "it'll
> get people off our backs."
Is it me or does anyone else think that NU is only "dreamin" about
being a passing team this year?
> Osborne isn't moving. Behind his American Gothic face and soft voice
> are some tough words.
> "We have lost four straight bowl games, but we haven't played Humpty
> Dumpty, either," he said.
That kinda rough shower-room talk has GOTTA fire up those Bugeaters!!
Cowboy
|
18.174 | Go Big Red !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:09 | 33 |
| re: few back
> It also has stepped up its weight program. Osborne wanted leaner linemen
>to catch up with Miami and Florida State. However, it backfired. His
>offensive line averaged a milquetoast 280 pounds on the bench press and it
>showed.
> The linemen's average has improved 50 pounds on the bench press and 20
>pounds on the scales.
This is very important. I think that Nebraska has not dropped off the last
few years because of the talent at the skill positions. It's the lines on
both sides of the ball.
Looks like them Huskers linemen have been eating lots of good corn fed
Nebraska beef - yesss, none better !! Just go to a steak house in Omaha
and you'll find out.
> But the biggest change is the offense. Osborne said Mickey Joseph, who
>leads a tight quarterback race, will throw about 20 times a game after
>throwing only 96 times in 26 previous games. Maybe that will offset a
>defense that lost seven starters, six to the NFL.
Hmmmm, I recently read that Haase won the starting position ??? From what
I saw in the bowl last year, Hasse looked pretty good. Much better than
Joseph. Geez, if Joseph starts then all the D has to do is zone for 30 yards.
I still havent gotten any news out of Omaha yet, but I will say, watch
Nebraska's I-back Brown. This kid is really good. The tight end is also
gonna be great. Mark my words, he'll be a 1st rounder in the NFL.
I'll post more news when I can get the Omaha field svc guys to respond.
Bugeater Marty
|
18.175 | Should I enter this or not? Shucks yes, I'll go ahead... ;^) | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:21 | 14 |
| re: .170
Quote of McArtney
> "A year ago is history. All the things that happened, all the breaks we
>got, all the good fortune, I don't deny any of it. I feel very fortunate
>to have it end up the way it did.
CU fans should be so realistic.
Oh, oh, here I go opening up a rats nest again. Oh well, why should the
Sports notesfile change now?
Husker Henderson
|
18.176 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Houston 47, Faiders 17! | Tue Sep 03 1991 13:59 | 11 |
| Hey Marty, do you think the Huskers will be able to handle mighty Utah
State this week? :^) CU should have it easy too, taking on Wyoming.
The Pokes couldn't even beat Hawaii at home, and Hawaii is usually
terrible when they play on the mainland. WYO should be up for this
one, though.
NU's game against CSU on the 14th will be picked up by Channel 9 in
Denver.
Joe
|
18.177 | Air Osborne in 91 !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Tue Sep 03 1991 17:51 | 16 |
| re: .176
Yea I think Utah will give Nebraska a tough game, something like 45 - 10. ;^)
We are in the boring portion of the college football season. This part of
the season could be compared to the NFL pre-season games. Tune up time except
for a few early season matchups.
Glad to hear the Husker/CSU game is on TV. Denver 9 huh? I'm not sure my
cable company gets Denver 9. I live in Woodland Park and I KNOW I can't
get it over the air up there in the moutains (8500 feet). What are the
call letters for that station? Is it a pbs station or a network station?
Thanks for the info Joe,
Nebraska Marty
|
18.178 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 03 1991 18:34 | 82 |
|
IOWA STATE/At a glance
Last year: 4-6-1, 2-4-1 (tie fourth)
Lettermen, starters returning: 38, 5 offense, 10 defense.
Strength: Quarterback. Forget last year. With an option offense and three
300-pound linemen, Chris Pedersen will be even better this season.
Weakness: Inexperience. Coach Jim Walden can't whine about lack of numbers
anymore. But of his 84 scholarship players, 67 are underclassmen.
Key date: Oct. 5 vs. Oklahoma. Cyclones beat Sooners last year for first
time since 1961. Now they get the preseason favorites at home.
Program needs: A winning record. Walden's not really on the hot seat, but
a bad year could warm it up. He has three losing seasons the last four
years and, with new depth, no more excuses.
Quotable quote: Walden on fans predicting his team's record - "In the bar,
it looks good. You can win a lot of games after three beers. The schedule
gets weaker and weaker as you get drunker and drunker. You can win all
your games if you stay in the bar long enough."
'Coach says Cyclones QB ranks No. 1 in Big Eight', by John Henderson
AMES, Iowa - Nebraska coach Tom Osborne says of his Iowa State counterpart,
Jim Walden, "I don't pay a lot of attention to what Jim says. There's so
much of it."
Osborne isn't the first coach to say Walden is full of something. And,
after the Big Eight Skywriters' stop here yesterday (Aug. 27), Osborne won't
be the last.
Folks in Norman and Boulder may find one Walden comment they can't throw
out with last night's fish. "I've got," Walden said, "the best quarterback
in the Big Eight Conference."
Good morning, Darian Hagan, Colorado's two-time all-Big Eight quarterback.
And hello, Cale Gundy, the man expected to lead Oklahoma from probation to
coronation.
But Walden is adamant about this. He says senior Chris Pedersen led the
league and finished 11th nationally in total offense (242.22 yards per game).
Walden brings up Iowa State's 33-31 upset at Oklahoma, where Pedersen
rushed for 148 yards and the winning touchdown with 35 seconds left.
Then Walden gives a speech on respect that would embarrass Rodney
Dangerfield.
"Big Eight prognosticators are a strange group," Walden said. "Maybe it's
just because you're not from Oklahoma or Nebraska, but I do get irritated
sometimes when I have a quarterback who led the league in total offense in
only nine games and for that he can't even get predicted all-Big Eight
quarterback. For that he gets put second team behind a sophomore from
Oklahoma. Things are a little out of kilter."
Walden was just warming up. Now he takes off the gloves.
"(Pedersen) is the best pro prospect," Walden said. "The guy at
Colorado's going to catch punts so he can make it (in the NFL)".
Walden is full of a lot of things, but one of them is quarterback
knowledge. He coached three future NFL starters at Washington State in
Jack Thompson, Mark Rypien and Timm Rosenbach.
"In some ways, (Pedersen) might be the best quarterback we've ever
coached," Walden said. "He's bigger and faster than Rosenbach and throws
the ball as well. He's faster than Rypien but not quite as big. He doesn't
have the strong arm of Jack Thompson, but (Thompson) ran about a 5.3 (40)."
With a 4.81, Pedersen may be the fastest 6-foot-3, 222-pound quarterback
in the country. That's one reason why Walden is replacing last year's one-
back attack with a two-back option offense.
Pedersen threw for 1,601 yards and rushed for 570 more, making Walden's
goal of 3,000 yards realistic.
"I could," Pedersen said. "The new offense really puts the offense at
the advantage."
Pedersen always has been overlooked. As a senior at Ankeny (Iowa) High
School, he didn't even make all-Central Iowa Conference. He severely
sprained his ankle his senior year, and Walden was the only coach to offer
a full ride.
"He was out there hobbling," Walden said, "but the thing I liked about it
was he was always out there hobbling."
Walden scouted him in a basketball game, saw his mobility and signed him.
He thought he might have a future tight end. Instead, Walden has someone
to brag about - 'really' brag about.
"He's a hulluva quarterback," Walden said. "He throws the ball strong
and runs as fast as some running backs in this league.
"Maybe he'll even get lucky enough to make second-team all-Big Eight."
|
18.179 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 03 1991 18:40 | 6 |
| I didn't know Woodland Park had cable. Did you guys just get it or
something? Channel 9 is Denver's ABC affiliate, but I can't remember
the call-letters. If you get Denver channel 4 (NBC) and Denver channel
7 (CBS), you probably get 9.
Joe
|
18.180 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Wed Sep 04 1991 13:06 | 12 |
| > I didn't know Woodland Park had cable.
Even Cripple Creek and Victor have cable, Joe. You'd think
we lived in the sticks... ;^)
> the call-letters. If you get Denver channel 4 (NBC) and Denver channel
> 7 (CBS), you probably get 9.
Won't Colorado Springs 13 also carry it? (channel 39 in Teller County)
Cowboy
|
18.181 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go IU Hoosiers | Fri Sep 06 1991 13:41 | 12 |
| Buffs open against WYO tomorrow. Darian Hagan's knee is at %100, and
he *will* return punts.
Will be real interesting to see how the BUffs look with all the new
faces. This is a good opener, because even if they play bad they
should still win. They might have their hands full with Baylor and
Stanford in the early going, but I definitely think this team can win 9
or 10 games.
5:30 tomorrow night, ESPN....Be there!
Joe
|
18.182 | Now they've got more QB's than they need. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Sep 06 1991 16:29 | 20 |
| At the end of last year, the CU quarterback position looked real
shakey for the 91 season with Hagan's knee injury and Charles Johnson
quiting the team. However....
I saw an interesting article in the CS Gazette Telegraph 2 or 3 days ago.
Coach McCartney claims that he has a new freshman quarterback who is much
more talented than they though when they recruited him. He claims he's
the most talented freshman quaterback he's ever coached including Hagan.
The guy is 6'3", over 200 pounds and has a very accurate rocket for an arm.
But, I can't remember his name.
Evidently, McCartney won't hesitate to play this freshman if Hagan gets
hurt or doesn't play up to expectations. In fact he is thinking of
using Hagan as a running back with the new freshman at QB.
Does anybody else have any info on this guy ?
Where does this leave Vance Joseph who is also a talented QB ?
Keith
|
18.183 | CU 30, WYO 13 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 09 1991 11:07 | 19 |
| The Buffs only led 16-13 into the 4th quarter but a couple late TD's
made it look good. Biggest weakness: no doubt the offensive line.
These guys will need to improve as a unit before 23rd ranked Baylor
comes in next week. Kahl was less than impressive at tailback.
On the positive side, Hagan is definitely back and the defense looked
great and had 9 sacks. Should be a defensive battle with Baylor next
week.
His stats were poor, but I was impressed with WYO QB Corontzos. Should
be a good game when they come down here to play Air Force next month.
Nebraska rolled over Utah State after leading only 24-14 at halftime.
Joseph left the game early, but I don't think it was due to injury. I
was surprised to see that Haas didn't play at QB. Is he hurt? The
Huskers set an NCAA record with 44 first downs.
Joe
|
18.184 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:23 | 23 |
|
Joe,
It sure looked like CU thought Wyoming was gonna lay down
for them.
I was impressed with Hagan. He looks even quicker! He
still needs to rent an arm though (or about 5 inches of
height so he can see over the line).
I was also impressed with CU's DBs. They laid some crunches
on Wyoming.
Although Chad Brown played well at outside LB, I wish they
would let him get back in the middle where he belongs. He
and Bieckert are tough.
CU's O-line is inexperienced and it showed. The entire offense
had better get it together before Baylor comes to town. The
defense may not be able to hold Baylor down (like they did Wyoming)
while the offense decides if they want to play or not.
Claybone
|
18.185 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:25 | 6 |
|
Cowboy,
What happened to your 'pokes?
Claybone
|
18.186 | 13-7 loss in Tulsa | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:42 | 21 |
| > Cowboy,
> What happened to your 'pokes?
> Claybone
I wasn't really expecting a win in Tulsa...and didn't get one either.
OSU's offense didn't come alive until the 4th Q when they punched it
in the end zone with 2 minutes left. They may be a decent team if
the key offensive players can be productive. The 13 points they
gave up against Tulsa was much better than in the years of Thomas
Sanders so maybe defense will keep them in some games until the
offense improves.
The Cowboys play Arizona State in Stillwater this weekend and its
supposed to be broadcast in Arizona. I'll post the satellite/tr
if anyones enterested.
Go Tailback U!!!
Cowboy
|
18.187 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Michigan *will* prevail | Tue Sep 10 1991 19:38 | 6 |
| Marty,
Since you're always starvin' for news on the Huskers, you'll be happy
to know that PSN carries the Tom Osborne show on Friday nights. Don't
know if it's always at the same time - it's at 9 this Friday.
Joe
|
18.188 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:51 | 6 |
| Yeah, and Prime Network carries a weekly BIG-8 football program
that shows at 11pm Friday. That time may or may not be the same
every week.
Cowboy
|
18.189 | Big Red MIGHT be BACK... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:34 | 55 |
| > Marty,
> Since you're always starvin' for news on the Huskers, you'll be happy
> to know that PSN carries the Tom Osborne show on Friday nights. Don't
> know if it's always at the same time - it's at 9 this Friday.
> Joe
Alright !!! Thanks for that info Joe. Now I can get Husker news and be totally
bored at the same time listening to Coach Osborne saying things like:
Oklahoma's gonna be a pretty tough opponent next week
Brown is playing pretty good (After a replay of a dazzling 80 yard run)
etc...
OK, about the Huskers this year. I've listened to both games on the Nebraska
Football Network this year. You can pick it up on KLNG AM 1060 broadcasting
from Longmont, CO. sponsered by the "Coloradan's for Nebraska"
Anyway, this is a different Husker team this year. The starting offensive line
AVERAGES 294 lbs. Geez!! They have beefed up big time from last year and, here
is the key, HAVE NOT LOST ANY SPEED FROM LAST YEARS TEAM !!! Whoa
The offensive line coaches went to Kansas City and got some ideas on different
blocking schemes from the Chief staff.
The defensive line has also beefed up but I have no figures.
Keithen McCant has moved to the top QB spot and has been impressive. His
passing has been very good. He's bigger than Joseph and has a much better
arm. He is a good leader also.
Even Osborne said that this is a very good offense. The ? is the defense.
After the CSU game durring the Nebraska Football Network "Coaches Comment"
Assistant Coach Charlie McBride said the he still has "no idea if the defense
is any good" CSU's 14 points came againse the Huskers subs. We will get a
very good idea of how good the Nebraska D is this Saturday when 4th ranked
Washington comes to Lincoln in a televised game. I think the Husker's and
the fans will be ready. Washington is the favored team but I believe this
will be a VERY good game. We will find out a lot about NU this Saturday.
The loudest roar from the 76000 at Memorial stadium in the second half was
when the CU/Baylor final was announced.
A little note about that game. I think it was best said by a Denver Post
columnist in the Sunday Paper. His column was titled "Lady Luck Turns Her
Back On CU." He went on to say that CU had AT LEAST it's share of luck the
last 2 years and it's run out not. Another factor is that CU is not good enough
this year to MAKE their own breaks in high numbers as they were last year.
I DID NOT SAY IT, THIS IS THE DENVER POST. However, I agree with it.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.190 | Husker fans never fail to take the bait! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:40 | 13 |
|
> Anyway, this is a different Husker team this year. The starting offensive line
> AVERAGES 294 lbs. Geez!! They have beefed up big time from last year and, here
> is the key, HAVE NOT LOST ANY SPEED FROM LAST YEARS TEAM !!! Whoa
Down, Marty, down boy! Every year we hear this kind of stuff as
Nebraska comes out like a house of fire in routing the Utah and
Colorado States. Then, by the end of the season, they're flatter
than a pancake. This year, I expect to see it happen a little
earlier, like next week, against Washington...
glenn
|
18.191 | Go Huskers... | DECWET::DEVLIN | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:46 | 11 |
| I tell ya one thing - I"ll be rooting for Nebraska to beat Washington
this weekend, if only to shut the damn Huskey fans up out here. These
folks are unreal - heck, some of 'em still whine about 84, and some
claim the Dawgs shoulda been #1 last year ('cept the big bad
Eastern/Midwest biased media ripped 'em off..)
ANyway, I root for whomever Washington plays!
Go Huskers!
JD
|
18.192 | those unbelievable cowboys | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:46 | 5 |
| Are the Okie State Cowboys really as bad as they're looking? So far,
they've lost to Tulsa on the road and got blown out at home by Arizona
State. This week, they're favored to lose at home to *TEXAS CHRISTIAN*.
TTom
|
18.193 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:50 | 12 |
|
> Are the Okie State Cowboys really as bad as they're looking? So far,
> they've lost to Tulsa on the road and got blown out at home by Arizona
> State. This week, they're favored to lose at home to *TEXAS CHRISTIAN*.
This is what happens when a middle-of-the-pack team gets busted for a
big-time NCAA probation. An Oklahoma can recover from a cheat binge,
an Oklahoma State has a much tougher time. That's unfair, but it's a
reality, I'm afraid...
glenn
|
18.194 | OSU needs some more work.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 16 1991 11:50 | 45 |
| > The Cowboys play Arizona State in Stillwater this weekend and its
> supposed to be broadcast in Arizona. I'll post the satellite/tr
> if anyones enterested.
To the hundreds of OSU fans that sent me mail wanting to watch the
game on satellite, I'm deeply sorry but after calling both OSU and ASU
athletic departments and being told that it wouldn't be broadcast,
I found it 30 minutes before kickoff. It was to be a delayed feed
to Arizona. What do they know anyways?
The score was 30-3 ASU. This was ASU's first game and OSU's 2nd.
Obviously, the Pokes need some work still but, in the first half,
it really looked like the would win the game. OSU started true-
freshman QB Brent Scott for his first ever college game. It showed
at time too! His RBs were also true-freshmen, and it also showed.
But, the offense did look very promising too. They moved up the
field well and controlled the ball. They just couldn't go all the
way without making mistakes. One mistake was a reception that was
returned for a TD. ASU had trouble getting 1st downs most of the
game. ASU's 2nd TD came off a questionable call on a 'fumble'.
ASU pulled a quick kick which OSU caught and started to return.
The ball carrier jammed his knee and fell down it pain. It looked
like he was down BEFORE he let go of the ball but the refs called
it a fumble. The next play was a pass for a TD. Oh well.
OSU needs some time to get these young offensive players some
experience. The O line and, really, the whole D looked good.
The O line is experienced but not very big. Hopefully, by the
time the BIG-8 schedule starts the offense will be cookin'.
By the way, this young QB is 6-4 and 208--not bad size. He's
a dropback passer that looks to have a strong, accurate arm.
Denson, the latest/greatest OSU RB didn't get any long gains
but then again, its only his second college game. His 4.2
speed will help if he can get open. His small size (5-8, 165)
may not be enough to make too many openings for himself, tho.
Next up is TCU at Stillwater. Hope its on the satellite. After
that is AT MIAMI. This one seriously worries me. OSU's offensive
line is good but small. We all know about Miami's. With the
'Pokes' young RBs and QBs it could get real painful to watch.
Cowboy
|
18.195 | They are NOT TOO BLAM, etc, etc.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 16 1991 12:03 | 17 |
| > This is what happens when a middle-of-the-pack team gets busted for a
> big-time NCAA probation. An Oklahoma can recover from a cheat binge,
> an Oklahoma State has a much tougher time. That's unfair, but it's a
> reality, I'm afraid...
> glenn
Thanks glenn. You coulda said they sukt (which I couldn't have
argued much).
Coach Pat Jones has had to look to Jr. College players, that have
experience, to get players to 'step in' and help out. Also, some
key O players (QB and RB) are very promising Freshmen.
hth, Cowboy
|
18.196 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Michigan *did* prevail | Mon Sep 16 1991 12:40 | 40 |
|
> The loudest roar from the 76000 at Memorial stadium in the second half was
> when the CU/Baylor final was announced.
And the loudest cheer at the Minnesota-CU game this Saturday will be
when they announce that Washington has beaten NU. :^) But seriously,
I'm anxious to see how Nebraska does against what appears to a
legitimate top-5 team. Washington was very impressive against Stanford
last week. Should be a good one. Isn't this game Saturday night?
> A little note about that game. I think it was best said by a Denver Post
> columnist in the Sunday Paper. His column was titled "Lady Luck Turns Her
> Back On CU." He went on to say that CU had AT LEAST it's share of luck the
> last 2 years and it's run out not. Another factor is that CU is not good enough
> this year to MAKE their own breaks in high numbers as they were last year.
There's no doubt that CU had their share of luck last year, but
virtually anyone who has won a national title has had their share of
luck either in the form of winning games or teams ranked ahead of them
losing.
As for CU's loss to Baylor, I only caught some of the 1st half, but it
seemed to be a combination of the O-line not up to speed yet and the
defense not quite living up to their billing. But I don't want to take
anything away from Baylor because they're a good football team. CU
again had trouble with a field goal being blocked, and this time it was
the big play of the game. CU was lining up for a FG leading 14-13 and
about 3 minutes left, but Baylor blocked it and it bounced way into CU
territory and Baylor returned it to about the CU 30. Baylor kicked the
game-winner with about a minute left and after CU drove to the BU 45
Hagan threw an interception with about 10 seconds left.
Getting back to NU, CSU isn't the cupcake Utah State is, but they
certainly aren't on Nebraska's level. CSU was never in the game and
trailed 43-0 at the half. Nebraska has yet to punt this year.
All Big-8 teams were at home this past weekend, the first time that has
happened in something like 5 years.
Joe
|
18.197 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 16 1991 12:57 | 10 |
|
I can't believe how Coach Mac has let the special teams slide
so far this year. If anybody knows the importance of special
teams play it's him (just ask Nebraska). They displayed a
glaring weakness in field goal blocking against Wyoming. It
was not corrected and Baylor took advantage. There was a
quote in the local paper by a true freshman lineman who was
in on that play, "I blocked the wrong guy...."
Claybroon
|
18.198 | Early evidence: Huskers are changing... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:08 | 69 |
|
>> Anyway, this is a different Husker team this year. The starting offensive line
>> AVERAGES 294 lbs. Geez!! They have beefed up big time from last year and, here
>> is the key, HAVE NOT LOST ANY SPEED FROM LAST YEARS TEAM !!! Whoa
> Down, Marty, down boy! Every year we hear this kind of stuff as
> Nebraska comes out like a house of fire in routing the Utah and
> Colorado States. Then, by the end of the season, they're flatter
> than a pancake. This year, I expect to see it happen a little
> earlier, like next week, against Washington...
> glenn
Glenn, there is some fact in your statement and some things that are not that
true.
Most years the Huskers have had 1 or 2 tough opponents in the 4 pre-conference
games. In the 80's I can recall UCLA, Penn State, Florida State, Auburn,
and there are others. It's only been the past 2 seasons that they have
had 4 patsie's. This year things are back to the norm for the Husker schedule.
Anyway, many of these years Nebraska has beaten these good teams early and
earned a deserving high ranking only to fold vs Oklahoma or the bowl. I believe
this is the pattern you are refering to.
This pattern is disturbing. All I am trying to convey are the reports that I'm
hearing about the team. I'm not saying that NU will win the National
championship or even the Big-8. I'm just trying to convey that they are improved
on offense at least. We don't know about the D yet.
Osborne knows his job is on the line. The Nebraska fans are really PISSED OFF
big time and Osborne knows it. I believe this has placed an extra level of
motivation on Dr. Tom and he is pushing it down to the other coaches and thus
the players.
The Huskers have thrown the ball aprox 23 times per game so far this year, but
remember, these were big blowouts and Osborne stops calling passes for the most
part when the game is out of hand. In a close game such as may be this week he
might throw it 30 times. This is very different for Osborne and I think it
shows that he knows things must change.
One more thing that Asst. Coach Charlie McBride said on the "Coaches Corner"
is that they have simplified the Definsive schemes this year. They are going
with less sets. He stated that the best Defense NU ever had was in '84 and
they only had a fraction of the sets that year as compared to last years
defense. Plus he stated that he dosent believe Nebraska's defense will be
controlled in the interior as they were last year. Also, the offense has
added some new sets.
Last year was different for the Huskers. They lost mental focus big=time after
the CU loss. McBride stated that NU was "as good or nearly as good" as Oklahoma
last year but got creamed by 40+ points because of mental letdown and the 7
turnovers associated with it.
I say a TV show on one of the C. Springs stations going over every Big-8 team
this year in what is called the Big-8 "Skywriters report." Almost every
Husker play mentioned the mental letdown after the CU game and the fact that
they have beefed up the interior this year without loss of speed.
I'm only trying to report what I have been seeing in the press. This may be
a repeat of years past with Nebraska. However, some things are changing in
Big Red land.
We Shall See !!!
Bugeater Marty
|
18.199 | sick offense? | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:16 | 8 |
| CU's offense seemed really flat to me. There was talk of switching
Hagan to RB and it sounds like a good idea to me, but probably too
late to try now. Don't they have a young QB that is more of a passer?
Seems like a Freshman? It may have been better to try more passing
then have the option of either handing or passing the ball to Hagan
in the open.
Cowboy
|
18.200 | Huskers over Huskies | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:21 | 6 |
| Big game this weekend: Washington at Nebraska. The polls say the Huskies.
The line says it's a pick.
I predict the Huskers.
TTOm
|
18.201 | This may set the rest of the season for UN... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 16 1991 13:42 | 11 |
| Nebraska at home is worth atleast a TD, but since they haven't
been tested yet UN may fall on their faces. Is the UN QB really
a passer or is he like Hagan? The pre-season talk was that
UN didn't have anyone that could throw the ball but Dr. Tom
mumbled something about passing the ball alot this year, anyhow.
I think Nebraska is still dreaming about being a passing team
(like CU).
Cowboy
|
18.202 | Osborne is getting a passing life... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Mon Sep 16 1991 15:45 | 40 |
| re: -1
Thru 2 weeks of play Nebraska is the leading Big-8 passing school. It is also
the leading rushing school.
McCant has surfaced as the top QB. This guy can zip the ball. He's 6'0" about
180 or 190. So he is fairly big. has a good arm and good field general skills.
He came from a high school that was passing oriented.
As I said earlier, Huskers have attempted 23 passes per game in blowouts.
The pass attempts tail off in the second half when your ahead by 1/2 a
million points. Osborne is sensitive about pissing off the opposing coach.
You may think this is just Husker fan hype but I don't believe anyone is
going to shut down the NU offense this year. The NU defense is still a
question mark.
I just spoke with someone in Omaha over the phone who is fairly close to
the Husker program. There have been lots of internal changes in the Husker
program and they are VERY focused.
Nebraska has run only 2 triple options so far this year. The triple option
has been one of NU's main plays for decades. They have instituded new offensive
sets and new blocking schemes including what is refered to as the "zone"
blocking scheme. Some of this came from the coaches vistits to the K.C. Chiefs.
Most people in Nebraska, and I can say also from Colorado Springs, expected CSU
to give NU at least a fairly good game. NO ONE expected 71-14 and all 14 points
coming vs the subs.
Just an interesting note: The Sunday Denver Post buried the writeup for this
game on page 9 of the sports section. A major college school (WAC conference)
game of local interest was buried on page 9. You can run but you can't hide.
We will see Saturday night but it appears that NU * MIGHT * have to print a
version of Colorado's T-shirt: "Things Have Changed"
Husker Hype or reality? Decide for yourself, but time will tell.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.203 | ;-) | HAVASU::HEISER | the rock stomps here! | Mon Sep 16 1991 17:52 | 1 |
| Anyone know how the Cowboys did?
|
18.204 | Atleast the 'pokes don't run up the score... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:31 | 6 |
| re:-1
For $19.95 I'll send you a copy of the game along with the blowout
against Texas A&M a few years ago. Priceless! 8^)
Cowboy
|
18.205 | Look below the surface... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in from of the Klingons" | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:55 | 25 |
| > Title: Atleast the 'pokes don't run up the score.
Is this a poke at Nebraska?
Why arent opposing coaches bitching about Nebraska running it up? Because the
opposing coaches know that when you play 100+ people and start the second team
defense the second half you are not attempting to run it up.
If I'm a second/third/fourth team player at Nebraska I'm gonna bust my butt
when I get playing time because I wanna start or at least start next year.
Nebraska DID play 100+ people and START the 2nd team defense the second half
against CSU.
In 1983 (When NU had Roger Craig, Mike Rozier, Irving Fryar) NU was beating
Minnesota so bad with the 3rd string that Osborne put a guy in at center that
had never snapped a ball in his life. This was an attempt to slow his own team
down.
Osborne has a sterling reputation amoung other college coaches which he
wouldent have if he TRIED to run the score up. Is he supposed to tell his
backup players to go out and give 50% ??? No way, that would not be fair
to those guys.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.206 | No 'running up the score' in my book.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Tue Sep 17 1991 10:53 | 29 |
| > > Title: Atleast the 'pokes don't run up the score.
> Is this a poke at Nebraska?
No, Infact when I heard the Nebraska score I didn't think "running
up the score". When 2 unevenly matched teams play there's no
way around it. Why try to "not score"? The schools are there
to play the game and get experience and practice for tougher
opponents so should do what they need to do to win all their
games. (Within good sportsmanship, of course)
Hey, Neb Marty, what's your prediction of the Washington game?
I think it'll be tight but with Nebraska at home they should pull
it out by a TD or less.
While I'm at it I'll prediction on the OSU/TCU game. A low scoring
defensive game with OSU's offense learning how to score, finally.
OSU by 3 or less.
Since I'll be history after this week here's the OSU/Miami prediction:
This will be both an offensive and defensive battle. (OSU's offense
will be battling to get ANY score at all while OSU's defense will be
battling fatigue from excessive playing time)
Miami 66-3. Damn that hurts!
If there's anything left the 'Pokes it'll be time start the BIG-8
season after that.
Cowboy
|
18.207 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:43 | 8 |
|
What little I saw of the CU game Saturday, there was a spot
during the game where JJ Flannigan was shown. What's he
doing hanging out in Boulder? I thought for sure he'd be
on some pro roster. He had Rocket's speed but was bigger.
Didn't San Diego draft him?
Claybone
|
18.208 | GO BIG RED scream the 76,000 red clad maniacs... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Sep 17 1991 12:56 | 31 |
|
> Hey, Neb Marty, what's your prediction of the Washington game?
> I think it'll be tight but with Nebraska at home they should pull
> it out by a TD or less.
Geesh, I don't know. I'm don't know enough about the Washington "Pups" (Just
a little joke) to really give a prediction based on anything other than my
loyalties.
From what little I do know about the Huskies, they have good speed on both
sides of the ball. I suppose they are big too. Don't they throw pretty well?
I don't think anyone can STOP Nebraska's offense this year. Huskers will
score some points on Washinton. The big test will be when the Pups have the
ball. Nebraska's D is "supposed" to be improved. Saturday will tell a lot.
I expect the huskERS to score in the 30's and the HuskIES to be within 6
points either way of Nebraska. This should be a really good game. I understand
it's an ABC regional telecast? If they don't show this one in Colorado I will
be, uhum, rather upset !!!
I do know one thing, the Memorial stadium crowd will be into it. So will the
team because for the first time in a long time the fans and the team feel they
have something to prove. This emotional edge could be a needed boost to put
the good guys in the white hats with red N on it over the top.
I'm not gonna predict a winner. Too close and I don't know enough detail about
Washington. All I know is that I'm sending my wife shopping Saturday night
and watching the game in reletive peace and serenity with no inturruptions. ;^)
Bugeater/Husker Marty/Henderson
|
18.209 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 17 1991 13:44 | 14 |
|
Washington's starting QB was lost for the season (don't know when,
probably in spring ball) and they are inexperienced at running back.
Their defense is supposed to be one of the best in the nation.
> I understand
> it's an ABC regional telecast? If they don't show this one in Colorado I will
> be, uhum, rather upset !!!
ABC is showing 3 regional games at 6pm Saturday, Georgia-Alabama,
BYU-Penn State and Washington-NU. I would imagine (and hope) they give
us the Nebraska game.
Joe
|
18.210 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Did Gail finish? We want to KNOW! | Tue Sep 17 1991 14:59 | 6 |
| Joe -
Actually, there's talk that Brtunnel - the Huskies hurt QB, may be back
as early as mid-October.
JD
|
18.211 | Huskers in a close one | DEMING::MCKAY | | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:07 | 4 |
| I'll predict a Husker win 24-21. I'll also predict I won't be
able to watch it in Mass. I wish ESPN had the game 8*(
Jimbo
|
18.212 | another curse!!! | JURAN::WEST | | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:32 | 6 |
|
Oh NO!!!! JIMBO you cursed th Huskers.....
Washington WINS *21-17* the last TD was called back for HOLDING!!!!
Tom wins!!!!
|
18.213 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Sep 18 1991 11:51 | 21 |
| McCartney has made a couple changes along the offensive line, including
tight end Sean Brown, who will be replaced by sophomore Sean Embree.
Brown must be being replaced because of his blocking, becasue he is
CU's leading receiver with 8 catches. Clint Moore, who missed his man
on the blocked field goal, will remain in the starting lineup.
Kansas and Kansas State are both 2-0 for the first time since
1923. Wow!!...it's hard to believe it's been that long.
RE: Washington at Nebraska
This should be a good game. Washington may have a little more
experience, at least on defense, but there really isn't much of a
difference in talent level when you're talking about 2 top 10 teams.
I think the big differences will be that NU has a lot to prove after
last year's poor finish and how low they were ranked coming into
this season. Plus they are playing at home. I like the Huskers in
this one.
Joe
|
18.214 | Washington drops to #14 | JURAN::MCKAY | | Wed Sep 18 1991 18:34 | 5 |
| no jinks here Kevin, Huskers roll to a big win in front of
the home crowd. This isn't the golf tourney, skill will win
not luck 8*)
Jimbo
|
18.215 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Oh Yea, Like I'd do that. | Wed Sep 18 1991 18:44 | 1 |
| Huskies stomp huskers 37-6.
|
18.216 | Yea right !!!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Sep 20 1991 12:08 | 7 |
| > Huskies stomp huskers 37-6.
Hey Jessie, you wanna come over to my cube and put some money behing your
totally illogical prediction? ;^)
Nebraska Marty
|
18.217 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Sep 20 1991 15:13 | 9 |
|
Somebody else, besides Bill McCartney, has complained
about Mizzou's field. John Mackovick(sp?) blasted
Mizzou for the poor field conditions. He coaches
Illinois btw. The Mizzou coach replied that if everybody
keeps complaining about the field, there's no way in hell
he's going to change it. Whatta guy!
Claybone
|
18.218 | If the Husker Defense gets better - Watch out... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sun Sep 22 1991 01:58 | 93 |
| Washington 36 Nebraska 21
The HuskERS are an improved team but the HuskIES are better than Nebraska.
Washington has a complete package. Run, pass, defense, special teams, and
coaching. I think they will cruise thru the Pac-10 and eat the Big-10 up
in the Rose Bowl. They are legit and they are a better team than they were
last year.
As far as Nebraska goes, well I think NU is a good team this year. They
are better than last year, especially in the offensive line.
You see, my attitude is changing. I think the Voice of the Huskers Kent
Pavelka said it best after this game was over. I paraphrase as closely
as I can remember it:
Nebraska fans are just gonna have to realize that this Nebraska
team is a very good team, maybe ONE of the better teams in the
country, but not THE best team in the country, AND THAT'S OK.
I, and most other Husker fans, have been guilty of the arrogant attitude thru
the years that if the Huskers are not THE best team then the season is a wash.
This is a bad attitude. I'm starting to realize that it is OK to not be THE
best every year. Nebraska puts a very good product on the field year in and
year out despite huge recruiting disadvantages. #1 is not everything. Pride,
character, and doing your best are at least as important. Even though I
criticize coach Osborne about things, he does have things in
perspective.
Go Big Red !!! Keep playing your hardest and doing your best as you always
do. NEVER QUIT!!! I'm proud of you.
Ok, about this game. The Nebraska offense was doing very well until 2 things
stared to happen:
1. Washington started establishing ball control. They kept the Husker
defense on the field and the Husker offense off the field.
2. In the 3rd quarter, after the Huskers took a 12 point lead, coach
Osborne stared playing not to loose and got conservative on offense.
I stated before this ball game that NU would have to score in the 30's to
win. They were on track for that until points 1 and 2 took root. Nebraska
has a very good offense this year. Much improved over last year. The offense
line is huge and quick. They will be very stiff competition for Oklahoma and
Colorado this year.
Nebraska's defense has to improve greatly. How can so many receivers be so
wide open all night? The ABC people kept emphasizing how quick and fast the
Wash. receivers were. I'm a believer.
I think the NU defense did a pretty good job in the first half. But they got
worn down in the second half. 622 total yards for Wash. GEESH!! Sometimes
the best defense is a good offense. Keep'em off the field and they can't
score. Washington did hurt themselves with holding penalties in the first
half, however, than MAY have been because they probably haven't faced lineman
of the quality, and size of Nebraska yet. They got their act together in the
second half though.
You could feel the game slipping away as the 3rd quarter passed. By the 4th
quarter the defense got worn down. The 80 yard run to clinch the game would
not have happened earlier in the game.
I'd like to see the stats for time of possession. Washington had to have had
a huge advantage there. I think that was a key. The best way to Keep Nebraska
from scoring is to keep them off the field.
I was impressed by the Nebraska crowd. They responded to Osborne's plea's via
the press for a fired up and noisy crowd. Coach Tom must have known that
the Huskers were up against it. He dosent say thing like that via the press
much.
The Huskers can't do what they did last year after the Colorado game. They died
after that. The NU coaches say that the players had no life/ spirit after that
CU game. They died mentally and considered the season a waste. Coach Charlie
McBride said that the players began believing "all the garbage in the press."
They can't do that again. They can still win the Big-8 and get beat in the
Orange Bowl by Miami. ;^)
This is an early season loss and the NU players must show character and NOT
QUIT. They can still accomplish a lot this season. Colorado from last year
is a good example.
Nebraska has improved miles over where they were last year in my opinion,
but they still have a long way to go. They have loads of potential.
Huskers not the best team in the country? Yup, but that's OK.
Go Big Red !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nebraska Marty
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
18.219 | Cowboy over and out.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:16 | 10 |
| Well, it looks like I'm history. Goodbye all sport noters.
In a coupla minutes I turn in my badge then later this
morning go to sign papers for my 'package'. This is a
strange feeling after 3 years.
Good luck to all! Watch out for plant closings at your
locations--I'm sure there's more to come.
Cowboy
|
18.220 | They should be the dogs against the Sooners later this year... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:16 | 15 |
|
Marty, you're coming dangerously close to falling to that plague that
has enveloped the state of North Carolina with respect to their beloved
basketball team and similarly-bewitched coach. Snap out of it, man! ;-)
Friday's paper contained an almost unbelievable piece of information
stating that Nebraska has not beaten a team ranked higher than itself
since *1978* (or maybe 1977; I forget). Is this correct? It may be
more of a refection on the pollsters than Nebraska, but that's amazing
nonetheless. I know they didn't have many chances to upset teams in
the early 80s when they were on top so frequently, but even in the
other years I'd figured there were at least a couple big wins thrown in...
glenn
|
18.221 | Hang in there, Cowboy... stick with those 'Pokes... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:18 | 1 |
|
|
18.222 | | CAM::WAY | ForeverWare: Lasts a lifetime | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:26 | 3 |
| Best of luck to you Cowboy!
Happy Trails......
|
18.223 | Big Red Fever NEVER Dies !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:21 | 25 |
| Good luck Cowboy. Best of luck to you.
re: .220
Hmmm, I have not heard that one. It may or may not be true. I do know for a
fact that NU has not beaten a ranked team since 1988!!! Also, a trend has
started to show itself. Nebraska plays a good 2 1/2 to 3 quarters and then
folds. Midway thru the 3rd quarter vs Washington NU was ahead by 12 and
lost by 15. We all remember that the same thing happened vs Colorado last
year.
The "not beaten a ranked team" thing is something the NU team and fans wanted
very badly to get off their back Saturday. Washington was just too good though.
Guess we'll just have to wait till Nov. 2 to get the monkey off. ;^)
No doubt NU has slipped over the last few years. But I also feel that they
are an improved team this year. If they can just get that defense playing
better they will be ok.
NU has a tough game again this week at Arizona State. Anyone know anything
about Arizona State? Are they ranked? Do they pass well? Defense?
Mark my words - Nebraska will benefit from the Washington game.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.224 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:25 | 27 |
| Good Luck Cowboy!! You'll be missed in here - I hate seeing a good
college football fan like you leave.
Marty, UW led in possession time 35:38 to 24:22. UW rushed 47 times
for 335 yards, NU 36 for 135 yards, and UW outgained NU in total
yardage 618 to 308.
I agree NU is still a very good team, but by that I mean a top 20 or 25
team. It's apparent they can't play with the nation's elite this year.
This NU team sure must be shaking their heads. They totally collapsed
in the 4th quarter, giving up 20 points, at home. And in their last 4
games against ranked teams they've been beaten soundly. And that
graphic ABC displayed was kind of amazing: NU hasn't beaten a ranked
team since 1988. Osborne needs to install some confidence and fire
into his team now, or they'll get beat again next week at ASU.
In CU's pasting of Minnesota, VAnce Joseph came into the game in the
2nd quarter with CU leading 24-0. Hagan had a great day passing,
completing 7 of 8 for 162 yards. True freshman QB Kordell Stewart also
played quite a bit and was impressive. Another true freshman, running
back Lamont Warren played very well and we may see quite a bit of him
before this season's over.
CU's game at Stanford next week is a regional one on ABC.
Joe
|
18.225 | go with the Sun Devils | HAVASU::HEISER | hold me, I'm a fermata | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:43 | 10 |
| I haven't seen ASU yet this year (they're 2-0), but they're obviously
improved over last year. Beating USC in the LA Coliseum is no easy
task and that's what they did on Saturday (was the ABC regional game,
but I was out). They rushed for over 300 yards against USC, beating
them 33-25. Their other win was a 30-3 crushing of Oklahoma St.
ASU has the home field and the revenge factor with them too (Huskers
beat them the last 2 years). I'd be surprised if the Huskers win.
Mike
|
18.226 | ASU is ranked 24th this week | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:46 | 1 |
|
|
18.227 | C-Ya Cowboy... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,McMurtry | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:48 | 1 |
|
|
18.228 | If Huskers can pull this one out it will be a boost... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Sep 23 1991 13:10 | 26 |
| I agree. Nebraska is a top 20 to 25 team right now. I think they can improve
to top 10 to 15 or possibly a little better by season end. They cant play
with the top 5 at least.
Mike, can ASU pass well? I'm more worried about that than the run. Even though
Washington got plenty of yards rushing vs NU much of that came late with a
very tired and mentally beaten Husker D on the field. Washington had problems
rushing vs NU in the 1st half. Nebraska always has been and IS vulnerable to
the pass, just like the other Big-8 powers. This is why the Big-8 has fallen
off nationaly lately over all.
I remember a few years ago when Nebraska beat ASU at ASU. ASU as really
pumped and thought they could beat the Huskers. It was a good game and I'm
sure that ASU is going to be up for this one also.
Don't count Nebraska out of this one. If ASU is ranked 24th (?) and the
Huskers at their current fallen-off level then this may be a very good
matchup.
Nebraska still feels as though they have something to prove and they won't
give the season up.
Is anyone picking this up on TV? ESPN, ABC, PRIME ????? It should be a good
game. Is it a night or day game. Night I hope out there in the desert heat.
Husker Henderson_wishing_for_the_old_days_when_my_boys_were_the_elite
|
18.229 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Sep 23 1991 13:15 | 19 |
| The most impressive thing about the CU/Minn game was the play of
CU's freshman. They definately had a good year for recruiting. Lamont
Warren looked very good running the ball( 2 TD's) but he was also excellent
catching passes out of the backfield. With his 4.3 speed I wouldn't be
surprised to see him moved to wide receiver and used much like Mike
Pritchard was last year.
CU is loaded at QB. I couldn't see anything that 2nd string Vance Joseph
did wrong when he played. However, freshman Kordell Stewart appears to
have too much talent not to start next year. His running looked great (good
moves, speed and more power than Hagan or Joseph) but the coaches say he's
best at passing. He only threw once for a completion. However, you can tell
that he still needs some work since he fumbled a couple of snaps and it
looked like he should have pitched the ball a couple of times on the option
but instead held the ball and ran. If this guy stays healthy, I wouldn't be
surprised to see him become one of the better college QB's and break
most of Hagan's records.
Keith
|
18.230 | | HAVASU::HEISER | hold me, I'm a fermata | Mon Sep 23 1991 18:29 | 12 |
| Re: ASU
As I said before, I haven't seen them yet. I do know that their QB is
vastly improved (only a sophmore) over last year (started as a frosh).
ASU usually has at least 1 good WR every year. Some really great
receivers have come to the NFL from ASU.
This game is also ASU's home opener (first 2 wins were on the road).
Everyone should be plenty psyched, especially after whuppin the
University of Spoiled Children.
Mike
|
18.231 | Why don't CU fans (in general) study the facts before they open their ugly mouths... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:12 | 74 |
| Mike, sounds like this one has all the makings of a really good game. This
is Nebraska's first road game. A lot is going to depend on the mental
attitude of the Huskers.
And don't anybody start talking about Nebraska's "weak schedule" anymore.
And if you CU fans think CU has a tough pre-conference schedule then think
again. Baylor is no Washington, not by a long shot. The other 3 CU opponents
are worthless. CU fans had no right to bitch about NU's schedule last year in
the face of CU's equally whimpy schedule thhis year. If you don't like that
statement then just look at the schedules and shut up.
Huskers non-conference this year has 2 ranked teams out of 4 opponents plus
1 WAC-10 team which almost beat an undefeated Air Force. Air Farce is now
ranked also. If Nebraska can come out of Saturday with a win then I think
they will have done very well so far.
I heard the most bogus krap last night on KOA (Denver) radio station sports
call in show.
Caller: I thought the Nebraska game was interesting. They run the score
up on OUR Colorado State then get it handed to them by a good
Washington team. They intentionally run the score up on so many
people it was great to see a good team destry them.
KOA: Yea Nebraska runs it up on lesser teams and then when they
meet a halfway decent team they fold.
Caller: Yea I was supprised to see Nebraska up 21-9 in the 3rd. Then
they folded. They did the same thing last year vs Colorado.
KOA: A lot of people saw what happened in the Washington game
comming. I think you'll see Colorado beat Nebraska again
this year without much problem and CU might beat Oklahoma.
$ SET FLAME/ON=FULL
This is pure Dog S&%T. Excuse my language. If I hadent of been in the car
I would have called in. There are NO facts here. And this kind of crap want
on for the whole show. This is only one example.
First: They are hypocrits (SP?). They say this after CU beats Minnesota (A real
powerhouse) 58 - zip. Now was CU intentionaly running it UP??? How can they
talk about Nebraska??? Of course CU was not INTENTIONALLY running it up. The
caller or KOA did not bother to research the FACT that Nebraska played over
100 people in that CSU game. They STARTED the second string D the 3rd quarter.
(This is the ONLY reason CSU even scored. So much for any thought about the
WAC being any good). I'm sure CU did pretty much the same VS powerhouse
Minnesota.
Second: The 2 games they mentioned, the CU and WASH. games, Nebraska was facing
a better team than themselves. With that in mind I don't call it a fold.
I call it comendable that NU worked their butts off to have a lead after
3 quarters vs a BETTER TEAM THAN THEMSELVES !!! When you extend yourself
so far like that it's tough to keep it up against a better team. I
think NU deserves credit for the effort vs, once again, a better team.
Third: CU fans - DON'T TAKE FOR GRANTED THAT CU IS GOING TO BEAT NEBRASKA THIS
YEAR!!! NU has a lot of time to improve before Nov. 2. NU has more
talent than they did last year. They are a better team. Plus all
indications are that CU is NOT AS GOOD AS LAST YEAR. Face it, they
are a good team but they do not have the talent they did last year.
Baylor is a good team but they are not top 10 quality.
I hope the CU fans do take the attitude of KOA and the caller because there
is a VERY good chance that they will loose to both OU and NU just like almost
every year up untill the last 2. They then will come crashing back down to
reality just like us Huskers fans have had to and quit being go f'ing arrogant.
Time will tell.
$ SET FLAME/OFF
We now return to our regularly scheduled programming.
Nebraska Marty !!!!!!!!
|
18.232 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:50 | 21 |
|
Marty, don't get all worked up just because one jerk said some stupid
things. There's alot of CU fans who are jerks, just as there are alot
of Nebraska fans who are jerks and fans of any team who are jerks.
> Huskers non-conference this year has 2 ranked teams out of 4 opponents plus
> 1 WAC-10 team which almost beat an undefeated Air Force. Air Farce is now
> ranked also. If Nebraska can come out of Saturday with a win then I think
> they will have done very well so far.
Air Force is *not* ranked right now, (at least not by AP) and doesn't
deserve to be IMO. I'm thrilled they're 4-0 but they play in a lesser
conference and they are only a breath away from being 1-3 or 1-2-1 or
1-1-2.
Joe
|
18.233 | fwiw | HAVASU::HEISER | hold me, I'm a fermata | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:58 | 20 |
| Marty, I went and borrowed a relative's Sunday's sports section just
for you ;-)
ASU QB Bret Powers passing line against USC was 7-14-0 - 149. Not very
impressive until you put it in perspective:
1. He was 5-9-0 - 125 as ASU raced to a 25-10 halftime lead.
2. ASU rushed for 307 yards (on 53 carries) as a team. Why pass when
USC couldn't stop them on the ground?
3. Receivers' stats: Guliford 4-104, Snyder 2-29, Moss 1-16. That's
a 21.3 yards per reception average! Obviously they have a passing
game!
ASU led 32-10 after 3 quarters. Now for the the defensive side of the
game:
USC rushed for 214 yards on 48 carries. Their passing line was 13-29-3
- 136. They averaged 10.5 per reception.
Mike
|
18.234 | | FMCSSE::BROWN | Can you Bupp the Pupp? | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:59 | 15 |
| re-1
Marty
Don't you ever get tired of gripping about this schedule non-sense.
Nu and every other school in the country make these schedules up
three to fives years in advance. They all have to find somebody to
play. I know you don't like hearing about NU's weak schedule but
why add fuel to the fire by complaining about everybody else's. What
you see if what you get. Lets keep the discussion to games that
have real value CU/NU, NU/oU etc.
Cadzilla
|
18.235 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Sep 24 1991 13:38 | 17 |
| Joe,
You are indeed correct on there being alot of NU fans
that are jerks...........
Air Force has also played mighty Weber St., that buzzsaw
of a team CSU, the juggernaut from Utah U., and the very
scary San Diego St. Aztecs on their way to that 4-0 record.
Marty,
I seem to recall you calling me down on the carpet for
referring to you as Bugeater. Yet, you sign yourself
off with it sometimes this year. What gives? Should
I withdraw my apology (which apparently wasn't needed)?
Claybroon
|
18.236 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Gail and Leadville,A Miniseries! | Tue Sep 24 1991 13:56 | 10 |
| Marty -
FWIW - the Seattle Times had an article on Sunday that said that Husky
fans that attended the game in Lincoln considered Husker fans to be the
nicest fans they ever met. Numerous stories of Husker fans inviting
Husky fans to tail gate with them, and in a couple of instances, Husker
fans *helped* Husky fans decorate their campers, etc., with Husky
colors.
JD
|
18.237 | Why don't people git their facts staraigt before they open their stupid mouths... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Sep 24 1991 14:09 | 12 |
| re: -1
I agree Joe. It's just that there were several "jerks" calling in with the same
brainless attitude. Look, even I, a vaunted CU Buff hater, give CU credit where
credit is due. And you would expect the KOA sportscasters to have a much more
accurate outlook. KOA is a major radio station.
I remember now where I got the Air Force thing. I heard a report saying that
Air Farce (Sorry, can't help it) was only a few votes away from being ranked.
Got it a bit mixed up.
Bugeater Marty ;^)
|
18.238 | Is he finally geting a clue?? Maybee they will improve!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Sep 26 1991 11:15 | 68 |
| Well, there's more than one way to skin a cat, as they say. I made a contact
with someone in Lincoln via the USENET. He has put me on a mailing list for
weekly Husker news from Lincoln!!! Yes !!!
Here is the first posting from that distribution. I have only 1 comment to
make. Dr. Tom is a PHD and it took him this long to figure out about finding
out about your weeknesses early? Geesh, I just have a little certificate from
an electronics tech school and I knew this long ago...
Husker Notes, Sep 25, 1991
The Nebraska Women's Volleyball team, which had its first three-match
losing streak sinc 1982 (!) has dropped to ninth in the latest ratings.
This Saturday, they host the FirsTier Invitational, which will feature
a sister-versus-sister battle. Janet Kruse, the senior All-American,
has a sister, Jodi, who plays for Georgia. The other participants in
this weekend's Invitational are Colorado and Maryland. Janet injured
her ankle in the season opener against Wisconsin and didn't return until
last weekend in NU's loss to New Mexico at the BUY/Mizuno Invitational
in Provo, Utah.
Copyright restrictions prevent me from reproducing all of Ken Hambleton's essay
in the Tuesday Lincoln Journal on ways to interpret the Husker's loss to
Washington last Saturday, but this entry stood out:
Critical: Washington has a better future in speech communication and
classics, too. [Background: NU has proposed eliminating these two
departments as part of a major budget reduction.]
Hambo also pointed out that Nebraska allowed only one pass completion for
more than 22 yards. (Gee, thanks!)
[This next statement is what I'm talking about]
Osborne quotes of the day: "I think the other thing that's positive about
[Saturday's loss to Washington] is you probably see some of the things that
we need to improve and you see it early in the year. So many times around
here it may be a late-season game before we're really exposed."
After being told that NU's appearance in the AP poll for 159 straight weeks
is one short of the record set by Michigan from 1968-1980: "That's good. I
haven't had any good news nationally for a long time."
On tight end Johnny Mitchell, who had two TD receptions in the first
two games, but didn't have a reception against Washington: "The problem is
you don't throw to the guy who's covered. I remember one time a guy said,
'Tom, I never played football but I used to play on a fraternity team and
had this uncanny knack of just getting open. Why don't you just tell
(former NU receiver) Guy Ingles to get open.' I said, 'Well, it doesn't
work that way. We don't just have a get-open pass.'"
Linebacker Trev Alberts didn't practice on Tuesday due to a sprained ankle.
He is questionable for the Arizona State game. Center Bill Ziegelbein
bruised an elbow and left practice early. QB Mickey Joseph, kicked in the
leg on Monday, returned to practice on Tuesday.
---
Michael Nolan
[email protected]
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA24052; Wed, 25 Sep 91 21:37:58 -0700
% Received: by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04521; Wed, 25 Sep 91 23:47:17 CD
% Date: Wed, 25 Sep 91 23:47:17 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ieegs02%[email protected], csc32::m_henderson, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], tssi!n
% Subject: Husker Notes--Sep 25th
|
18.239 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Sep 26 1991 15:03 | 81 |
| Here's more Husker news from the 24th...
Husker Notes, Sep 24, 1991
In preparation for this Saturday's game first road game, against Arizona
State, Tom Osborne says the team might resort to the same preparation tactics
that they used in for the 1987 Arizona State game--heating the Schulte Field
House to 95 degrees to help condition the players to the temperatures expected
in Tempe. Since the long-range forecast for Lincoln this week has highs in
the 60's, Osborne may have the team practice out of doors, then go into the
heat for 15 minutes of wind sprints.
In 1987, the Huskers received a one-game waiver from the Big Eight 60 player
travel roster limit, so that they could take 70 players to Tempe. They have
received permission to do this again in 1991.
The game will be televised by the Nebraska Educational Television Network,
but contractual restrictions will permit the game to be live only in the
Lincoln and Omaha areas, with the rest of the state seeing the game on a
one hour tape delayed basis. Kickoff is at 7:07 pm MST (9:07 CDT).
Arizona State is averaging 424.5 yards per game, 246.5 rushing, 178 passing,
while giving up 291.5 yards per game. They also are plus six in turnovers
through their first two games. Arizona State is 2-0, beating Oklahoma State
30-3 and Southern Cal 32-25, both games on the road.
With Soto's broken leg keeping him out until at least bowl time, Osborne may
drop plans to redshirt sophomore Cory Schlesinger, but doesn't plan to move
Scott Baldwin from I-back to fullback, at least not for the moment. Baldwin
practiced at fullback last spring, and would be the logical choice if there
is another injury at that position. Baldwin is not expected to play against
Arizona State. Tight end William Washington, who missed the Washington game
with a strained hamstring, returned to practice Monday.
The depth chart this week has a few changes--Bill Ziegelbein has moved
back to starting center, wingback Abdul Muhammad, who had a couple of good
plays in the Washington game, has moved up to the number 2 position and will
alternate with starter Nate Turner this Saturday.
The NU depth chart for this week reads as follows. A dash indicates players
are sharing that spot in the list.
Split End: John Bostick, Tyrone Hughes, Dan Pleasant-Corey Dixon
Left Tackle: Erik Weigert, Lance Lundberg, Rob Zatechka
Left Guard: Dave Jensen, Chris Zyzda, Ken Mehlin
Center: Bill Ziegelbein, Jim Scott, Terris Chorney
Right Guard: Will Shields, T.J. Slansky, Brenden Stal
Right Tackle: Brian Boerboom, Zach Weigert, Ray Reifenrath
Tight End: William Washington, Johnny Mitchell, Daryl Liese-Chris Garrett
QB: Keithen McCant, Mickey Joseph, Tom Haase
FB: Lance Lewis, Tim Johnk, Robert Glanz, Andre McDuffy
IB: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, George Achola, McDuffy Injured--Scott Baldwin
WB: Nate Turner, Abdul Muhammad, Vincent Hawkins, Mark Dowse
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett
K: Bennett, Tom Seiler
Deep Snapper: Ziegelbein, Jason Baker
Holder: Mike Stigge, Tom Haase
Punt Returns: Corey Dixon, Tyrone Hughes, Vernon Powell, Nate Turner
Kickoff Returns: Turner, Hughes, Dixon, Brown
Left Outside LB: Travis Hill, David Leader, Lance Gray
Left Tackle: Kevin Ramaekers, Jamie Liewer, Matt Hillman, Terry Connealy
Middle Guard: Pat Engelbert, David Noonan, Jerry Irons
Right Tackle: John Parella, Brian Brown, Bruce Moore
Right Outide LB: David White, Trev Alberts, Donta Jones
Strongside LB: Mike Petko, Darren Williams, Troy Branch, Shane Geiken
Weakside LB: Mike Anderson, Ed Stewart, Paul Wightman, Doug Colman
Left CB: Curtis Cotton, Kenney Wilhite, Sedric Collins
Right CB: Tyrone Legette, Mike Heins, Vernon Powell
Strong Saftey: Steve Carmer, Troy Dumas, Ernie Beier
Free Saftey: Tyrone Byrd, Lorenzo Brinkley-John Reece
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA07654; Thu, 26 Sep 91 08:58:39 -0700
% Received: by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01410; Thu, 26 Sep 91 11:06:14 CD
% Date: Thu, 26 Sep 91 11:06:14 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: csc32::m_henderson
% Subject: Re: Beats me
|
18.240 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:55 | 33 |
| A Quick look at this weekend's games:
CU at Stanford: Stanford doesn't appear to have that good of a team,
getting destroyed by Washington and losing to Arizona. CU center Jay
Leeuwenburg has a broken hand but will play. The Buffs came together
last week - let's see if they can keep it going this week in their last
non-conference and first road game. Stanford gets ND next week.
NU at Arizona State: I can't see the Huskers losing 2 in a row. If
they do, there will be *major* rumblings in Lincoln. ASU has a chance
to show they're for real - last week's win over Jekyll & Hyde USC could
be deceiving.
Indiana at Missouri: Should be a good game. Missouri beat a good
Illinois team but got whipped at Baylor.
Iowa State at Rice: ISU embarrassed the conference by losing to
Wisconsin last week. They will probably lose again against an
improving Rice team and finish the non-conference slate at 1-3. ISU
coach has benched starting QB Chris Pedersen.
Kansas State at Washington: No more I-AA cupcakes for KSU here as they
hit reality in a big way. Blowout city.
Virginia Tech at OU: Another blowout. OU's last easy game before they
play Texas and the rest of the Big 8. However, the way things are
going, the Texas game looks like it'll be an easy one also. Homecoming
for OU.
Kansas (3-0) and Oklahoma State (0-3) are idle.
Joe
|
18.241 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:44 | 8 |
| Joe,
However bad Texas may appear, it wonn't be an easy game for
OU. This is a big time rivalry we're talking about.
How can OU have a homecoming gthat's played in Dallas? :^)
Claybone
|
18.242 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:46 | 5 |
|
Please excuse the garbled note. I'm going throug a modem
to GEENRAL and we're experiencing technical difffiulties.
Claybone
|
18.243 | Hope This Helps | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Sep 27 1991 22:02 | 4 |
| OU can have its Homecoming in Dallas because all their best players
come from Texas.
John
|
18.244 | If they don't beat the Longhorns this year, heads will roll | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:48 | 14 |
|
> OU can have its Homecoming in Dallas because all their best players
> come from Texas.
*Usually* OU's best players are from Texas. This year's pre-season
pick for Big 8 Player of the Year, Cale Gundy, is Sooner born-and-bred,
however (even though our departed friend Cowboy would call him 'Poke
born-and-bred, and therefore a traitor...)
Is OU's homecoming really the Texas game? I didn't think they did
that...
glenn
|
18.245 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:57 | 9 |
| Didn't mean to cause all this confusion. OU's game against Virginia
Tech was their homecoming. I'm surprised they struggled against the
Hokies.
No, I'm not ignoring the CU loss. They were very flat and unemotional
and deserved to lose. More later. Let's hope Stanford can pull
another upset next week!
Joe
|
18.246 | strange game | HAVASU::HEISER | hard music is good to find | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:03 | 11 |
| I didn't see the Nebraska-ASU contest (except for some highlights).
From what I've heard ASU gave them a game that they should've won.
Final was 18-9. Nebraska's kicker was blocked 4 or 5 times. ASU
committed 7 turnovers, 3 inside of their own 20 and the defense snuffed
the Huskers each time.
Bret Powers (ASU QB) had to leave the game in the 4th with what they
thought was a separated shoulder. Turns out it was a severe sprain and
he's week to week.
Mike
|
18.247 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:36 | 12 |
| Mike, from what I heard, and I did not see the game, NU intercepted about
3 times and sacked the ASU QB about 5 or 6 times. My understanding is that
NU tried to give this game away. Hmm, funny how people can see the same game
and yet see 2 different games.
Any non-partisan fans have the real scoop? I havent even seen any stats as
the Colorado papers seem to try to ignore all other Big-8 opponents untill
they play them.
Huskers back on track.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.248 | Stanford 28, CU 21 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:40 | 29 |
| As I said, CU was was flat and played without emotion. Offense was
very stagnant, but the defense wasn't exactly stellar, giving up 485
yards of total offense. Even though Stanford drove for an early TD I
wasn't concerned because the Buffs usually start slow. They got going
in the 2nd quarter after an interception return for a TD and Hagan
threw a TD pass. It looked like CU was on track later in the quarter
when they were driving again and leading 14-7, but stalled and Harper
missed a field goal. The key point was probably early in the 3rd
quarter when Stanford converted a 4th and about 7 and went in for the
tying TD. After falling behind 21-7, Joseph came in when Hagan was
hurt and brought the Buffs to within 21-14 with about 3 and a half
minutes left. But CU gave up 3 first downs to Stanford and they ran
out the clock - game over.
Hagan strained a tendon in his knee, but it wasn't related to his
Orange Bowl injury and he should be ready for the Missouri game on Oct.
12th. CU is off this week. Much to my surprise, the Buffs are still
ranked at #25.
RE: Nebraska
They were trailing in the 3rd quarter 9-8.
Missouri tied Indiana 28-28, but IU got ripped. Missouri tied on a
2-point conversion, but I saw the play and MU quarterback Phil Johnson
did not get into the end zone. Definitely a bad call.
Joe
|
18.249 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:43 | 7 |
| Correction on the CU summary. They fell behind 28-14 and pulled to
within 28-21 with about 3:30 left.
Marty, I have box for the NU game - let me know what stats you're
interested in.
Joe
|
18.250 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:50 | 16 |
| Has anyone heard anything about Hagan's injury ? If I were Hagan, I'd
seriously consider the professional baseball offers he's received and
think about retiring from football while he can still walk.
The youth and inexperience of the CU offense really showed when they've
come up against the better teams in their schedule. I though the offense
was way too conservative and should have opened the game with more passing.
The freshman dominated offensive line just isn't opening the holes for the
running backs. Lamont Warren made a critical fumble which resulted in the
most important Stanford score but he still looks like an excellent talent
who should star for CU in the future.
I was impressed with both of the Stanford running backs. They are both
expected to be high draft picks for the NFL.
Keith
|
18.251 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:09 | 19 |
| I did a little research and found a disturbing statistic. While Big 8
teams are 16-10-1 overall this year in nonconference games (with 4
games to go), they aren't doing too well against the major conferences.
Here's the Big 8 records against other conferences for 1991:
vs. Big 10 2-2-1
vs. Pac-10 1-4
vs. SWC 1-3 (1 game left, OU vs. Texas)
vs. ACC 0-0 (1 game left, KU vs. Virginia)
vs. Big East 1-0 (1 game left, OSU vs. Miami)
There are no games between Big 8 teams and SEC teams (thankfully!) this
season. I guess the worst part is how poorly the conference is doing
against the Pac-10 and SWC, 2 conferences that are considered to be
fairly weak.
Joe
|
18.252 | Most disturbing thing is weak scheduling overall... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:30 | 12 |
|
Of course, it's mostly the Big-8 patsies playing those tough
non-conference games, right Joe? Oklahoma's taking the year off in that
regard (excepting the traditional game against a mediocre Texas), so
whatever level they're at they've decided not to test it this year.
For what it's worth, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Colorado haven't impressed
this season from what I've seen. But someone's got to go to the Orange
Bowl...
glenn
|
18.253 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Sep 30 1991 15:41 | 6 |
| Thanks Joe.
I would like to see total yards, yards rushing, yards passing and time of
possesion on that NU/ASU game.
Bugeater Marty
|
18.254 | one that got away | HAVASU::HEISER | briefing for the ascent | Mon Sep 30 1991 16:18 | 21 |
| Marty, all I saw of the game were the highlights on the coach's weekly
show. ASU led 9-8 late in the 3rd and still gave the game away. The
defense for ASU was awesome! Especially when the offense fumbled 3
times inside their own 20. The defense stopped them all 3 times,
blocked 1 of the FG attempts (the Husker kicker muffed the other 2,
hitting the right upright, then the left). ASU had 7 turnovers total
and still were in the game well into the 4th quarter.
Nebraska should've scored something out of those opportunities and came
away with nothing. They should also look for a kicker that can kick.
In addition to the above, ASU blocked another FG attempt and an extra
point attempt. Part of his problem is that he kicks line drives.
Nebraska lucked out on the blocked extra point attempt. The ball
bounced right back to a Husker near the goal line and he just stepped
across for the 2 point conversion.
ASU's coach played too conservatively on the passing game. They
could've thrown on Nebraska, but never attempted anything over 30
yards.
Mike
|
18.255 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 16:52 | 28 |
| Glenn, here is the breakdown of teams vs. major conferences:
CU: 1-0 vs. Big 10, 0-1 vs. Pac-10, 0-1 vs. SWC
KU: Plays UVA this week
KSU: 0-1 vs. Pac-10
ISU: 0-2 vs. big 10, 1-0 vs. SWC
MU: 1-0-1 vs. Big 10, 0-1 vs. SWC
NU: 1-1 vs. Pac-10
OU: 1-0 vs. BE, plays UT still
OSU: 0-1 vs. Pac-10, 0-1 vs. SWC, plays Miami this week
NU-ASU Stats:
NU ASU
First downs 19 14
Rushes-yards 61-253 32-63
Passing 63 197
Passes 7-15-1 15-22-2
Fumbles-lost 0-0 7-5
Penalties-yds. 6-55 5-35
Time of poss. 34:43 25:17
NU passing: McCant, 5-12-1, 37 yards, Joseph 2-3-0-26
NU rushing: Brown 25-135, McCant 13-61, C. Jones 3-29, Lewis 6-20, Joseph 3-5
Johnk 1-3
Joe
|
18.256 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:27 | 110 |
| Husker News 1-Oct-1991
From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 1-OCT-1991 00:05:39.25
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ieegs02%[email protected], csc32::m_henderson, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Nebraska-Arizona State, story & stats
Nebraska 18, Arizona State 9
The fans knew it was going to be an off day when the Nebraska coaching staff put
on their new red shirts and discovered they were a shade or two darker than
their previous ones, more like the 'Oklahoma' red than the 'Nebraska' red.
The kick specialists sure had an off day: one blocked extra point, two
blocked field goals. (The blocked extra point was recovered behind the
line of scrimmage by TE William Washington, who ran it into the end zone
for a two-point conversion.)
The offense had an off day, getting only two touchdowns despite excellent
field position throughout the game. Several drives stalled out in the
'red zone', within the Arizona State 20 yard line.
Even the vaunted Nebraska rushing game had an off day, with just 253 yards,
dropping Nebraska to 2nd place in the NCAA rushing category, behind Army.
(Hmmm, maybe General Schwartzkoff has been moonlighting on the Hudson?)
Nebraska remain on top of the punting statistics, with a 43.5 yard net punting
average.
The defense stole the show, literally: 2 interceptions, recovering 5 of 7 ASU
fumbles. They held ASU to 'only' 197 passing yards and just 63 on the ground.
They also sacked the ASU quarterback 4 times.
Sophomore I-back Derek Brown didn't have an off day, although he wasn't
aware of it at the time. He had 135 yards rushing, to become the first
Husker to rush for 100+ yards in the first four games of the season since
Jarvis Redwine in 1980. He was also named Big Eight offensive player of the
week. In a locker room interview, Brown was amazed to find out he had rushed
for more than 100 yards.
Tom Osborne said of the performance, "It wasn't pretty, but it was a good
win, and it was an important time for us to win."
Osborne also remarked, "You watch. There will be a lot of people disappointed
that we didn't score more points. But that's OK. I've kind of gotten used
to that. We won the game." What Dr. Tom didn't mention was that Nebraska
did cover the 6 1/2 point spread, which may still the voice of the malcontents.
Nebraska now has another off week, but this one by design. They begin the
Big Eight conference season in two weeks at Oklahoma State.
Scoring and stats:
Nebraska 8 0 3 7 - 18
Arizona State 0 3 6 0 - 9
NU - McCant, 1 yard run (Washington run)
ASU- Ritchey, 37 yard field goal
ASU- Montgomery, 1 yard run (run failed)
NU - Bennett, 28 yard field goal
NU - Bostick, 9 yard pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
Attendance: 72,812, the 2nd largest crowd for a regular season game in
Tempe. An estimated 10,000 Nebraska fans were there, mostly from the
Southwest.
NU ASU
First downs 19 14
Rushes-yards 61-253 32-63
Passing yards 64 197
Total yards 317 260
Return yards 8 8
Passing 7-15-1 15-22-2
Punts 4-46.0 2-33.0
Fumbles-lost 0-0 7-5
Penalties-yards 6-55 5-35
Time of possession 34:43 25:17
Individual Stats:
Rushing: D. Brown 25-135, McCant 18-61, Jones 8-29, Lewis 6-20, Joseph 3-5,
Johnk 1-3
Passing: McCant 5-12-1-37, Joseph 2-3-0-26
Receiving: Hawkins 1-22, Muhammad 1-10, Mitchell 2-9, Bostick 1-9,
Brown 1-9, Jones 1-4
Punting: Stigge 4-184 (46.0 yards average)
Kickoff returns: Dixon 1-27, Hughes 1-19, Turner 1-12
Interception returns: Carmer 1-5, Liewer 1-3
Partly personal: This should be the last post to you all from this account.
Future posts will be from the new huskers mailing list.
Although the system that the mailing list is on is not quite as well-connected
as this one, it will be easier for me to manage the list, thus improving it.
Thanks to the initial bunch of subscribers for encouraging me to keep at it and
for helping me debug the mailing list setup. If, by chance, you don't get
anything for a couple of days, e-mail me just in case I have a latent bug.
To subscribe and other administrivia, send e-mail to [email protected]
To post to the list, send e-mail to [email protected]
Michael Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA08451; Mon, 30 Sep 91 23:05:06 -0700
% Received: by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA11665; Tue, 1 Oct 91 01:14:35 CD
% Date: Tue, 1 Oct 91 01:14:35 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ieegs02%[email protected], csc32::m_henderson, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], tssi!n
% Subject: Nebraska-Arizona State, story & stats
|
18.257 | ND on the horizon? | CTHQ3::LEARY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:34 | 7 |
| Marty,
Have you seen any Nebraska schedules post-1995? I read somewhere in
a ND publication that Notre Dame and Nebraska have scheduled a match
for the late 1990's. Ring a bell?
MikeL
|
18.258 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Would you, Could you, with a goat? | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:02 | 19 |
| The Buffs (2-2), Huskers (3-1), and KSU (3-1) are idle this week.
OU (3-0) is playing at Iowa State (2-2) in the first conference game of
the season. The Sooners always play a conference game earlier than
everyone else because they play the Longhorns during the Texas State Fair,
which is usually around the middle of October (OU-Texas is on Oct. 12th
this year).
Oklahoma State (0-3) is going to Miami (3-0, ranked 2nd) to get killed.
KU (3-0) is playing at Virginia (2-2), an interesting matchup that has been
talked about a bit over in the ACC football note. UVA certainly isn't the
team they were last year, but this should still be a good measuring
stick for Kansas.
Memphis State (2-2) plays at Missouri (1-1-1)
Joe
|
18.259 | | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 15:50 | 8 |
| re: Huskers vs Fighting Irish
My understanding is that this is not official yet. NU & ND are trying to
negotiate a deal.
Hope it comes about,
Nebraska Marty
|
18.260 | Husker update Oct. 6 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:02 | 61 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 6-OCT-1991 10:32:02.82
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 6th
Husker Notes, Oct 6th
Interesting that both of the following involve Seattle....
Rich King, the former NU center and the 14th pick in last year's NBA draft,
has signed a four-year contract with the Seattle Supersonics worth $2.8
million. The contract was signed just two hours before the 'Sonics opened
their fall training camp. King suggests that since virtually NOTHING happened
for two or three months after being drafted on June 26th that the NBA
consider moving the draft day to just before training camp opens. "That
way there won't be all this waiting and confusion."
Former Husker defensive lineman Jim Skow, who has played for the Bengals
and played last year with Tampa Bay but was released by them this summer, has
signed a contract with the Seattle Seahawks.
The Nebraska women's and men's cross country teams finished third and 13th
at the Minnesota Invitational on Saturday. Fran ten Bensel finished first
in a field of 140 runners to win the women's individual title, the best
the men could do was 19th place, by David Iteffa.
NU Defensive Coordinator Charlie McBride, while likening the current rules
situation in college football to 'playing pro football on grass', feels
that the Nebraska defense has learned a lot from the Washington and ASU
games. "We're still trying to get everybody in the right position and
alignment in the first place. You can't do anything without knowing the
basics. But we're gaining in confidence. The offense can still limit
how many things the defense can do, but we're getting better. I think this
can be a good defense."
The Washington and ASU games have made at least one convert to the NU cause.
Lincoln Journal-Star sportswriter Mike Babcock, who had picked Nebraska to
finish 3rd in the Big Eight (Colorado 1st, Oklahoma 2nd), now thinks the final
order will be Nebraska, Oklahoma, Colorado. "Some people only saw the
inability of Nebraska's offense to capitalize on opportunities provided by
the defense. I saw a team experiencing growing pains. The Cornhuskers went
through some tough times the last two weeks. But they survived in Tempe
by coming away with a victory, whcih means they also survivied the Washington
loss. They should be better for it."
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA10004; Sun, 6 Oct 91 09:31:12 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14182; Sun, 6 Oct 91 11:41:18 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Sun, 6 Oct 91 11:23 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 6th
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Sun, 6 Oct 91 11:23:35 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.261 | Husker update Oct. 7 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:03 | 42 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "huskers list manager" 7-OCT-1991 23:15:54.08
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 7th
Husker Notes, Oct 7th.
According to the TV, I-back Scott Baldwin worked out today for the first
time since his ankle injury during the opening game of the season. He
went the entire 2 1/2 hours, and is reported to be feeling OK, but not
100%. Derek Brown will likely start at I-back against Oklahoma State,
and may have the starting job until somebody like Baldwin *takes* it away
from him. (See below.)
Also, tight end William Washington made it through the full practice today,
which means his hamstring must be getting better.
The NU Women's Volleyball team crushed Illinois Sunday, 15-7, 15-7, 15-1,
before 4,052 spectators at the Bob Devaney Sports Center. This was another
battle of sisters, as Eileen Shannon's sister, Kathleen, plays for
Illinois. Eileen responded with her best match of the season.
Taking a week off didn't hurt NU's position in the NCAA statistics, they
regained first place in rushing offense. They are still 2nd in net punting,
3rd in total offense and turnover margin, 5th in scoring offense, and
7th in punt returns. Derek Brown is 9th in individual rushing, averaging
132.7 yards/game. Steve Carmer and Kenny Wilhite are tied with for 8th place
in interceptions with 3 each.
---
Michael Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA07890; Mon, 7 Oct 91 22:15:12 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA19034; Tue, 8 Oct 91 00:25:41 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Oct 91 23:56 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Mon, 7 Oct 91 23:56 CDT
% From: [email protected] (huskers list manager)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 7th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.262 | Husker Update Oct. 8 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:04 | 62 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 8-OCT-1991 23:45:39.24
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 8th
Husker Notes, Oct 8th
A lot of people have claimed Tom Osborne is in the dark, but a water line
break in South Stadium that required workers to cut power to the football
offices is responsible, THIS TIME. :-) The coaching staff moved over
to the Nebraska Center to study films and work on the game plan for this
Saturday's Big Eight Conference opener at Oklahoma State.
OSU is 0-4, and coach Pat Jones is probably wondering when he's going
to stop getting soaked, too. That Oklahoma State hasn't beaten Nebraska
since 1961 is only part of his problems. His Cowboy's are last in the
conference in offense, and seventh in defense, aided in part by the
fact that 12 out of the 33 players who played against Miami last week
weren't even on the OSU roster last year, and two starters are out with
knee injuries. It should be noted, however, that OSU's four opponents
so far (Tulsa, Texas Christian, Arizona State, and Miami) are 14-4 this
season.
Jones said, "The thing is, we're not done. The morale is actually pretty
good. Emotionally we should be up because its a Big Eight opener and
Nebraska is one of those teams we've often played very tough."
The only Husker to miss practice on Monday was cornerback Tyrone Legette,
who had a cyst removed from his hip. Erik Wiegert has apparently been
permanently moved from tackle to guard.
Campus notes: As previously reported, budget cuts may cause the demise
of the classics and speech communications departments. (The latter
held a silent protest.) The Philosophy and Art History departments have
eliminated phones in professor's offices as cost-cutting measures, although
some faculty members have elected to pay the cost themselves. The first of
13 hearings by the University Academic Planning Committee on the proposed
budget cuts mandated by the Legislature was today. New UNL Chancellor
Graham Spangler, who assumes office on November 1st, has stated that he
doesn't feel eliminating the classics or speech communications departments
will 'cripple the University'. The UNL chapter of AAUP has raised $4000
so far to fight the cuts. Retired UNL horticulturist Harvey O. Werner,
sometimes called 'the father of the Nebraska potato industry', died Monday
at 97. He taught at UNL from 1918 until 1962, remaining active in research
afterwards.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA09308; Tue, 8 Oct 91 22:45:20 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA24866; Wed, 9 Oct 91 00:56:03 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Oct 91 00:30 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 8th
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Wed, 9 Oct 91 0:30:02 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.263 | Husker Update Oct. 9 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:07 | 80 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 9-OCT-1991 18:46:55.87
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 9th
Didn't have energy enough to type the depth chart yesterday. (The
Twins-Blue Jays game was so exciting I fell asleep just as Toronto was
coming close to tying the score.)
A lot of changes from the last one, mostly 2nd and 3rd string offense.
The NU depth chart for this week reads as follows. A dash indicates players
are sharing that spot in the list.
Split End: John Bostick, Tyrone Hughes, Dan Pleasant-Corey Dixon
Left Tackle: Lance Lundberg, Rob Zatechka
Left Guard: Erik Weigert, Chris Zyzda, Dave Jensen
Center: Bill Ziegelbein, Jim Scott, Jason Baker
Right Guard: Will Shields, T.J. Slansky, Ken Mehlin
Right Tackle: Brian Boerboom, Zach Weigert, Ray Reifenrath
Tight End: William Washington, Daryl Liese-Johnny Mitchell, Chris Garrett
QB: Keithen McCant, Mickey Joseph, Tom Haase
FB: Lance Lewis, Tim Johnk, Andre McDuffy, Robert Glantz (Soto-injured)
IB: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, George Achola, Scott Baldwin
WB: Nate Turner, Abdul Muhammad, Vincent Hawkins, Mark Dowse
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett
Left Outside LB: Travis Hill, David Leader, Lance Gray
Left Tackle: Kevin Ramaekers, Jamie Liewer, Matt Hillman, Terry Connealy
Middle Guard: Pat Engelbert, David Noonan, Jerry Irons
Right Tackle: John Parella, Brian Brown, Bruce Moore
Right Outide LB: David White, Trev Alberts, Donta Jones
Strongside LB: Mike Petko, Darren Williams, Troy Branch, Shane Geiken
Weakside LB: Mike Anderson, Ed Stewart-Paul Wightman, Doug Colman
Left CB: Curtis Cotton, Kenney Wilhite, Sedric Collins
Right CB: Tyrone Legette, Mike Heins, Vernon Powell
Strong Saftey: Steve Carmer, Troy Dumas, Ernie Beier
Free Saftey: Tyrone Byrd, John Reese, Lorenzo Brinkley
The Lincoln paper doesn't list these, which I had earlier gotten from the
Omaha World-Herald, so I don't know if there have been any changes:
K: Bennett, Tom Seiler
Deep Snapper: Ziegelbein, Jason Baker
Holder: Mike Stigge, Tom Haase
Punt Returns: Corey Dixon, Tyrone Hughes, Vernon Powell, Nate Turner
Kickoff Returns: Turner, Hughes, Dixon, Brown
Tom Osborne said he was somewhat disappointed with Monday's practice, the
players weren't as sharp--possibly because of the off week. Tuesday's
practice was better, Osborne said. Although Scott Baldwin's ankle injury
is healed enough to permit him to practice, he will probably not be on
the travelling squad to Oklahoma State this weekend.
And now the latest episode of "All My Ex-players": [Organ music, rising]
Former NU player Jeff Mills, now with the Denver Broncos, was arrested in
Denver early Wednesday morning. Stopped because his car did not have two
license plates and had illegally tinted windows, Mills did not have a drivers
license on him and refused to put his fingerprint on the ticket as a form of
identification.
When Mills refused to get out of his car, two Denver patrolmen forcibly removed
him. (Must have been interesting, Jeff is about 240 as I recall.)
He was charged with driving on a suspended license, among other things,
and posted a $1000 bond. [Organ music comes to a chord, fades out]
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA25589; Wed, 9 Oct 91 17:46:29 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01629; Wed, 9 Oct 91 19:57:21 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Oct 91 19:03 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 9th
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Wed, 9 Oct 91 19:03:34 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.264 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:15 | 6 |
| N.D. vs. "Huskers". I think it's a typo. What with the NBC
connection I believe it's really the "Huckstables" vs. N.D. in a five
man flag football match or it's the "Hulkster" vs. N.D. in a special
Saturday Night Main Event. HTH.
/Don
|
18.265 | How to get on the list... | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:29 | 9 |
| re: Husker Updates
I'm on a distribution list for these updates. This list comes from a non-DEC
source in Lincoln Ne. I stumbled onto this via the USENET.
If you want to get onto this list you can send mail to the FROM: field
in the Husker Update notes and request to be placed on the list.
Husker Henderson
|
18.266 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 11 1991 13:27 | 18 |
| Tomorrow it's Mizzou at CU in a rematch of last year's 'fifth-down
game'. I'll tell you one thing, the Tiggers better strap 'em up and
come to Boulder ready to play. After listening to the fifth-down story
countless times over the past year the Buffs will be ready to take it
out on Mizzou. Plus McCartney's been working his team hard the past 2
weeks after the poor showing at Stanford. But you gotta believe
that Missouri will also come in steaming because they feel they
beat the Buffs last year. Certainly no love loss in this one, even
though Missouri is McCartney's alma mater.
In the OU-Texas game, OU tailback Mike Gaddis will be starting after
missing the past 2 seasons. Last week Gaddis had over 100 yards
against Iowa State. OU is favored by 6, which I feel is way too low.
Nebraska plays Oklahoma State, and Osborne has never lost to OSU.
Joe
|
18.267 | Husker Update for 14-Oct-1991 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 14 1991 14:19 | 81 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 14-OCT-1991 10:17:06.44
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: NU 49 - OSU 15
"As I said before the season began," Tom Osborne said, "our goal is to try
to call at least 25 passes a game and get the ball in the air somewhere between
20 and 25 times. That would be up about 15 times a game from previous years."
By that standard, Keithen McCant's 19 pass attempts, added to two each by
Mickey Joseph and Tom Haase, means that Osborne was successful in achieving
his goal in the Oklahoma State game. By *anybody's* standards, Keithen's 17
completions was a success. In fact, The 89.5 percent completion rate ranks
as the third-best ever by a Husker QB.
Also continuing his string of successes was I-back Derek Brown, who ran for
143 yards in 18 carries, giving him five straight 100 yard games this season.
(The Husker record is 11 straight 100-yard games, by Mike Rozier.) In fact,
two of Brown's carries gave him a 100 yard day all by themselves, runs of 61
and 40 yards. Brown's 134.8 yard per-game average ranks 7th in the nation.
Scoring and Stats:
Nebraska 14 7 7 21 -- 49
Oklahoma State 0 3 5 7 -- 15
NU - Hughes 34 yard pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
NU - Brown 61 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Brown 1 yard run (Bennet kick)
OSU- Myers 33 yard field goal
NU - Mitchell 8 yard pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
OSU- Saftey, McCant tackled in end zone
OSU- Myers 37 yard field goal
NU - Brown 40 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Muhammad 31 yard pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
NU - Joseph 11 yard run (Bennett kick)
OSU- Denson 14 yard run (Myers kick)
Attendance 30,150
NU OSU
First downs 21 20
Rushes-yards 40-273 37-100
Passing yards 231 254
Total yards 504 354
Return yards 46 25
Passing 17-23-1 18-44-3
Punts 4-47.3 7-34.4
Fumbles-lost 1-1 2-1
Penalties-yards 4-48 8-63
Time of possession 25:10 34:50
Third-down conversions 5-10 4-16
Fourth-down conversions 0-1 1-2
Individual stats:
Rushing: D. Brown 18-143, McCant 10-48, Jones 5-45, Lewis 2-15, Joseph 2-13,
Turner 1-6, Achola 1-6, Hawins 1- -3.
Passing: McCant 17-19-1-231, Joseph 0-2-0-0, Haase 0-2-0-0.
Receiving: Mughes 5-77, Mitchell 4-47, Bostick 2-39, Muhammad 2-38, Turner 4-30.
Punting: Stiggee 4-180
Punt returns: Turner 1-4, Hughes 1-6.
Kickoff returns: Hughes 3-52, Turner 1-36.
Interception returns: Beler 1-22, Byrd 1-14, Powell 1-0.
Early injury reports: Reserve outside LB David Leader suffered a broken hand,
I-back Derek Brown had a slight charley horse.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA27664; Mon, 14 Oct 91 09:16:46 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02833; Mon, 14 Oct 91 11:27:37 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Oct 91 11:07 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: NU 49 - OSU 15
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Mon, 14 Oct 91 11:07:09 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.268 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Seachickens & Blue Jays are Chokers! | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:38 | 32 |
| The 'good, enthusiastic' Buffs decided to show up Saturday and the
result was a 55-7 whipping of Mizzou. Total domination by CU with 656
yards of total offense and 37 first downs - and reserves were in before
halftime. If CU plays this well they will definitely have a chance of
winning next week in Norman. But if they play like the team that showed
up at Stanford forget it.
Oklahoma somehow managed to lose to Texas for the third straight year
and all but ruin their chance at a national title. I admit I was
actually pulling for the Sooners to run the table for the regular
season and play the undefeated winner of the Miami-FSU game for all the
marbles. But noooo, go ahead and choke OU and invite ND right back
into the national title picture.
The Sooners were trying to become a good passing team this year but only
managed 69 yards through the air Saturday.
Big Eight standings:
Conf. All
Kansas State 1-0 4-1
Nebraska 1-0 4-1
Oklahoma 1-0 4-1
Colorado 1-0 3-2
Kansas 0-1 3-2
Missouri 0-1 2-2-1
Iowa State 0-1 2-3
Oklahoma State 0-1 0-5
Joe
|
18.269 | Husker Notes 15-Oct-1991 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:46 | 68 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 14-OCT-1991 23:45:57.29
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 14th
Husker Notes, Oct 14th
Former Husker Steve Taylor completed 18 of 25 passes for 356 yards and 3 TD's
as the Calgary Stampeders defeated the Ottowa Rough Righders 44-24 in the CFL.
Rich King, former NU Center and first-round draft choice of the Seattle Kings,
scored four points in his NBA debut during an 87-84 exhibition game win over
Miami. King is expected to back up former Creighton center Benoit Benjamin
this season.
Broderick Thomas, Mike Croel, Travis Hill,... Ryan Terwilliger?? The Grant
football player hopes to be the next great outside linebacker at NU. The
6-5, 210 lb senior gave a verbal committment to Nebraska last week. A
versatile athlete, Ryan averaged 13 points a game last year in basketball
and qualified for both the long jump and the triple jump at the state track
meet. He says he plans to concentrate on just football at NU.
Verbal committments have also been received from T.J Scribner of Omaha
Brownell-Talbot and Eric Stokes of Lincoln East.
Not NU, but interesting: Humboldt's Teri James scored the first points by
a girl in a Nebraska high school football game Friday night as the Cardinals
defeated Pawnee City 48-0. The 5-4, 125 lb junior scored the final touchdown
on a 5-yard pass with 1:37 left in the class D-1 eight-man game, which then
ended because of the 45 point rule.
The Huskers continue to lead the nation in rushing, with a 361.4 yard average.
They are also 2nd in net punting (42.9 yards/kick), tied for 2nd in turnover
margin (plus 2.6 per game), third in total offense (522.2 yards/game), and
fifth in scoring offense (43.6 points/game). Kenny Wilhite is tied for
eighth in interceptions (0.75/game).
Wilhite is considered probable for the Kansas State game, after sitting out
the OSU game with an ankle injury. OLB David Leader will try to play with
his broken hand in a cast. I-back Scott Baldwin will probably see limited
action in the KSU game.
The Nebraska Women's golf team shot a 332 Sunday at Iowa City for a three-round
total of 975 and a third place finish in the Hawkeye Invitational.
The NU Men's basketball team opens practice on Tuesday. Newcomers will have
to play a big role this year, because the majority of last year's team is
gone. Jamar Johnson, a Prop 48 sophomore, is now academically eligible and
eager to get back to basketball. (He couldn't even practice last season.)
Juco transfer Derrick Chandler, a 6-10 center, is ready to test out his
shoulder, which was operated on in mid-September.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA29332; Mon, 14 Oct 91 22:45:32 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06314; Tue, 15 Oct 91 00:56:38 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 15 Oct 91 00:27 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 14th
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Tue, 15 Oct 91 0:27:20 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.270 | Husker Basketball 1991/1992 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:42 | 74 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 15-OCT-1991 10:17:57.18
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 15th--Basketball Edition
~
Husker Notes, Oct 15th--Basketball Edition
At 8:30 am on Monday, Oct. 14th, 150 floor-level season tickets to the
University of Nebraska-Lincoln men's basketball games went on sale. They were
gone by 8:40. Enthusiasm remaining from last year's 26-8 season (the most
wins ever by NU) and their short-lived 2nd appearance in the NCAA tournament
has boosted season ticket sales to 10,050, up 12.9 % from 1990-91. At this
point, the only remaining season tickets are for the upper level seats at
the Bob Devaney Sports Complex arena.
Last year's team set a new attendance record of 13,307 per game. This year's
team seems destined to break the record.
According to coach Danny Nee, "The goal now for Nebraska basketball is to try
to win a Big Eight championship." The Huskers' last outright championship
was in 1916, the last time the claimed a share of it was in 1950. The
Huskers fell one game short last year.
Nee has a lot of rebuilding to do to replace Rich King, NU's first-ever
1st round NBA draft choice, along with Clifford Scales and Tony Farmer, both
of whom signed free-agent NBA contracts, and Beau Reid. Returning players
likely to have major roles include Carl Hayes, who started 28 games last
year and averaged 13.5 points and 5.3 rebounds per game, and Eric Piatkowski,
who averaged 10.9 points and 3.7 rebounds last season and starred on the
gold medal North team at the U. S. Olympic Festival this summer.
Newcomers include Derrick Chandler and Michael Hughes.
Whatever happens, it's likely to be a lot more public this year, because
the Huskers are scheduled to be on TV 15 times this season, three times on ESPN,
five on Prime Sports, and seven on the Big Eight Conference's Raycom package.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Men's Basketball Roster
Player Pos Ht Yr Home town
Dapries Owens F 6-8 Sr Mansfield, Ohio
Jamar Johnson G 5-11 So Elkhart, Ind. (Prop 48 last season)
J.F. Holman G 6-1 Jr Holbrook, Neb. (Originally a walk-on)
Carl Hayes F 6-8 Sr Chicago, Ill.
Michael Hughes G-F 6-7 Jr Peoria, Ill.
Chris Cresswell G 6-4 Sr Merced, Cal.
Jason Glock G 6-4 Fr Wahoo, Neb.
Derrick Chandler C 6-9 Jr Mitchelville, Md.
Terrance Badgett F 6-6 Fr Omaha, Neb.
Eric Piatkowski F 6-6 So Rapid City, SD
Bruce Chubick F 6-7 So Atkinson, Neb.
Head Coach: Danny Nee (6th year 87-72)
Assistants: Gary Bargen, Lynn Mitchem, Jeff Smith.
Grad. Assistant: David Lutz
Walk-ons who will be practicing with the team include 5-10 freshman Matt Mar,
from Lincoln Northeast, and 6-4 sophomore Jason Peterson, from Oakland-Craig,
who is also on the NU golf team.
---
Michael Nolan, list administrator for the Huskers mailing list
To subscribe, reply to [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA23216; Tue, 15 Oct 91 09:17:21 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00213; Tue, 15 Oct 91 11:28:03 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 15 Oct 91 09:30 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 15 Oct 91 09:30 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 15th--Basketball Edition
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.271 | Big-8 Stats thru 10-12-91 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:11 | 141 |
| Article 5838
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!scott
From: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Eight Stats(10-16)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 16 Oct 91 20:36:59 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Lines: 127
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: scott
BIG EIGHT STATS
Individual Statistics
RUSHING
Player Car yds avg yds/g
Brown,NU 102 674 6.6 134.8
Sands,KU 105 589 5.6 117.8
Gallon,KSU 90 440 4.9 88.0
Gaddis,OU 73 358 4.9 71.6
Williams,OU 36 217 6.0 54.2
Jones,NU 39 270 6.9 54.0
McCant,NU 57 270 4.7 54.0
Warren,CU 35 266 7.6 53.2
Robben,KU 70 248 3.5 49.6
Brewer,OU 40 245 6.1 49.0
Kahl,CU 54 239 4.4 47.8
Patterson,ISU 41 210 5.1 42.0
Hagan,CU 52 204 3.9 40.8
PASSING EFFICIENCY
Player att comp yds td rat pts
Hagan,CU 79 45 673 7 152.7
McCant,NU 82 48 641 7 137.7
Gundy,OU 95 51 734 6 131.0
Watson,KSU 116 73 971 2 130.3
Johnson,MU 158 89 1043 7 117.5
Pederson,ISU 87 46 598 2 111.3
Hilleary,KU 106 54 645 3 107.6
TOTAL OFFENSE
Player yds ave yds/g
Johnson,MU 1087 5.6 217.4
Watson,KSU 963 6.4 192.6
McCant,NU 911 6.5 182.2
Hagan,CU 877 6.6 175.4
Hilleary,KU 814 5.4 162.8
Pederson,ISU 790 5.2 158.0
Gundy,OU 705 5.5 141.0
Brown,NU 674 6.6 134.8
Ford,OSU 615 4.9 123.0
Sands,KU 589 5.6 117.8
Gallon,KSU 440 4.8 88.0
RECEIVING
Player gam ct yds ct/g
Chamberlain,MU 4 25 314 6.2
Smith,KSU 5 28 415 5.6
Kayhill,MU 5 26 236 5.2
Milliner,OSU 5 23 303 4.6
Kirksey,OSU 5 16 235 3.2
Warren,OU 5 15 231 3.0
Drayton,KU 5 15 219 3.0
Leach,MU 5 15 126 3.0
Team Statistics
RUSHING OFFENSE
team car yds yds/g
NU 269 1807 361.4
CU 264 1355 271.0
KU 292 1289 257.8
OU 277 1205 241.0
KSU 207 787 157.4
ISU 210 785 157.0
OSU 187 494 98.8
MU 174 462 92.4
PASSING OFFENSE
team att comp yds yds/g
MU 177 100 1163 232.6
KSU 145 84 1105 221.0
CU 100 56 823 164.6
NU 109 59 804 160.8
OSU 139 64 802 160.4
ISU 117 62 784 156.8
KU 121 62 769 153.8
OU 100 52 742 148.4
TOTAL OFFENSE
team plays yds yds/g
NU 378 2611 522.2
CU 364 2178 435.6
KU 413 2058 411.6
OU 377 1947 389.4
KSU 352 1892 378.4
MU 351 1625 325.0
ISU 327 1569 313.8
OSU 326 1296 259.2
RUSHING DEFENSE
team car yds yds/g
OU 148 306 61.2
KU 172 543 108.6
NU 191 701 140.2
CU 202 736 147.2
KSU 209 802 160.4
ISU 232 923 184.6
OSU 201 943 188.6
MU 247 1491 298.2
PASSING DEFENSE
team att comp yds td pts
OU 192 93 1063 4 85.15
KU 165 89 881 4 100.73
CU 155 79 1039 2 105.08
MU 166 78 1145 5 107.64
NU 167 89 1249 6 113.60
KSU 123 64 944 7 122.27
ISU 109 59 796 7 125.66
OSU 157 105 1219 7 135.35
TOTAL DEFENSE
team plays yds yds/g
OU 340 1369 273.8
KU 337 1424 284.8
ISU 341 1719 343.8
KSU 332 1746 349.2
CU 357 1775 355.0
NU 358 1950 390.0
OSU 358 2162 432.4
MU 413 2636 527.2
--
Scott D. Davis <[email protected]> The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!ksuvax1!deimos!mccall!scott) 615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041 Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
|
18.272 | I'll go first... | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:57 | 11 |
| OK, I'm gonna do it. I'll be the first to stick my neck out. The CU fans
seem to be very carefull about saying much about This Saturdays game. I
can understand why.
I pick Oklahoma by more than 7 and less than 14.
YOU heard it here FIRST !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.273 | CU by 10, Ya heard it here first | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:23 | 29 |
| OK, Marty, here's how a CU fan see's the game in Norman.
I read in the paper today that OU has had the easiest schedule of any
Big 8 team. Even with the cupcake schedule, their wins haven't been that
impressive. And they lost to an average Texas team.
CU's freshman and sophmore dominated team has loads of talent but their
inexperience has shown in their tough games. McCartney claims the offensive
line is playing much better than early in the season. They will certainly
be tested against a statistically good OU defense. Hagan has been passing the
ball better than he ever has before. True freshman, Lamont Warren, is a real
running threat and CU has many speedy but inexperienced receivers. The CU
defense is tough against the pass but was pushed around by the Standford
running game.
The key for CU will be to contain the OU running game and to play with
confidence on offense. I don't think OU is as good as everybody thinks they
are but it's still very tough to win in Norman. I'll go out on a limb,
be optimistic and pick CU to win by 10 with either Hagan or Chris Hudson
returning a punt for a TD. I'll guess a final score of 24-14.
As far as the Big 8 in general goes, I think Nebraska is the team to beat.
This year's tougher schedule is helping them to identify team weaknesses and
make the improvements before the big CU and OU games. Next year, CU should be
the team to beat since they are loaded with young talent.
We'll see on Saturday, how bad I blew it with my CU-OU prediction.
Keith
|
18.274 | GO BIG RED of the North of Course !!! | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:30 | 64 |
| re: -1
Keith, I'll agree about CU being a young team and the fact that they should
be better next year. I want to add 1 thing to what you are saying. Most
people either don't realize or have forgotten that this years NU sqaud is
also a "young" team. Generally not as young possibly as CU but "young"
for a Nebraska squad. NU should be better next year also.
I agree about OU. As Nebraska last year they are kind of an unknown entity
thus far this year. The thing that you have to remember about the OU/Texas
game is that sometimes actual talent and team records becomes null in a game
between 2 rivals which practically hate each other. The OU/Texas rivalry is a
bitter one. So because of this I'm not really sure we have seen the real OU
yet this year, whatever level that is.
Be it known that my kiss of death prediction a few notes back was based on
these weak points:
1. Game at Norman
2. Mental edge to OU for 2 reasons:
Coming of tough and possibly undeserved (In OU's own
perception) loss last week to a hated rival. In short,
OU may feel they have something to prove.
3. As a Husker fan I'd rather loose to OU than CU. ;^)
I realize that is very shaky ground for a prediction. Thay's why I said
I am "sticking my neck out."
One note about CU and the blaming of youth on their problems thus far in '91.
Yes, the youth thing has hurt them, but if CU is going to be a powerhouse
year in and year out such as the OU's and NU's of the world, then this sort
of thing has to be overcome. They must come to the point where they are
"reloading" rather than "rebuilding." I thing CU is in a rebuilding mode
currently.
One reason I think this: Some quotes from the CU defensive players
after the Stanford game. "In the second half we knew exactly what they
were gonna do, but we couldent stop them. They basicly only ran 2 plays
the whole half and we knew it was coming but couldent do anything about
it."
This is in reference to Stanfords pounding the ball at CU up the middle.
Now, yes, Stanford has the largest O-line in football (yes, pro's also)
and I'm sure this had an effect. But Stanford has far from the BEST O-line
in college football and they were able to have their way with CU's D in
the second half. I think this indicates a drop off in talent. This years
Stanford line would NOT have been able to do that vs LAST years CU D. No
matter how young and inexperienced you are, if you KNOW what's coming then
your inexperience is null and void.
I just don't think CU has anywhere near the talent they had last year. That
dosent mean they can't win Saturday or against Nebraska. One thing is for
sure, CU will be a better team by the time they do play the Huskers. The
comforting factor for me is that the Huskers are getting better also. Even
though NU is vulnerable to the pass, I firmly believe that a late season
game with Washington would be a better contest than we saw a few weeks back.
Well, I'm rambling now. The '91 Big-8 war begins with a battle this Saturday.
Time will tell,
Bugeater Marty ;^)
|
18.275 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:17 | 31 |
| Marty, The way I see it, there were 3 reason's why CU couldn't stop the
run against Stanford:
1. The Offense played poorly. Because they went 3 downs and out
too many times, the defense was on the way field way too much. They
actually stopped the run fairly well for the 1st 3 quarters. After a
while, those 300+ pound linemen, wore down the CU defense. For the
most part, the defense is experienced, it's the offense that has
most of the freshman and sophmores.
2. One of CU's starting inside linebackers (I belive his last name
is Fischer)trashed his knee in the 1st game of the year and he's
out for the year if not forever. His replacement also experienced
a serious injury and won't play again this year. Thus, CU has to
start a 3rd string true freshman, John Knutson, at inside linebacker.
His play has been less than spectacular. So, injuries have
definately hurt the run defense.
3. Ya got to give some credit to the Stanford team. The announcer
said that both of Stanford's running backs may go in the first
round of the NFL draft and one of them is a Heisman candidate.
Ugg, now I'm a little less optimistic about CU's chances this week because
OU put's a lot of emphasis on running a big Fullback right up the middle.
Thus, CU must mount some long drives on offense to keep the OU offense
off the field and keep CU's defense fresh. I think the offense has made
a lot of progress lately but they haven't played good against a quality team
yet. I hope they let Hagan pass right from the start since he's been very
accurate lately. And it would certainly help if they got some big plays
from special teams. I'll stick with my optimistic 10 point CU prediction
but I admit it looks shakey.
Keith
|
18.276 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:27 | 46 |
| > I'm not really sure we have seen the real OU
> yet this year, whatever level that is.
Yea, but I'm not sure we're gonna see the real OU this year. I
expected OU to be much better than they've shown thus far.
> 1. Game at Norman
Definitely a huge factor.
> 2. Mental edge to OU for 2 reasons:
>
> Coming of tough and possibly undeserved (In OU's own
> perception) loss last week to a hated rival. In short,
> OU may feel they have something to prove.
Good point. Not only does OU have more seasoned talent then CU at this
point, but the Sooners should be fired up. Plus, they realize they can
still win the Big 8 outright, go 10-1 and finish top 5 with an OB win.
> 3. As a Husker fan I'd rather loose to OU than CU. ;^)
Verrrrry interesting. Here we have an OU-NU hatred that ranks right up
there with Auburn-Bama, USC-UCLA, Clemson-South Carolina, Michigan-Ohio
State, etc. But an upstart team that didn't reach national
prominence until 2 years ago and was a perrenial league doormat
throughout the early 80's suddenly is an NU fan's most hated rival.
Just what McCartney envisioned when he took over the CU program in
1981.
> I just don't think CU has anywhere near the talent they had last year.
There's no doubt about this one. We're talking about a team that had 9
or 10 guys drafted last April, 4 of which were in the first 2 rounds.
That's a lot of talent.
Now for this week's game. Before the season or up until last weekend I
was going with OU. OU wasn't that impressive early on but I thought
they would come around. However, the loss to Texas proved to me that
OU really must not be that great. Anyway, I'm going with the Buffs in
a real close one - I'll say by a TD or less. One's thing for sure: the
CU team that showed up at Stanford better not be anywhere near Norman
tomorrow, but in a big game like this Mac will have 'em ready.
Joe
|
18.277 | A W is a W... | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:26 | 43 |
| Hmmm, this stuff is familiar. Crow pie, Crow stew, Crow vegitable cassarole,
Crow juice.
CU played a good game and desrved to win. This is setting up another classic
in 2 weeks.
OU just dosent look anything like everyone thought they would. Unless OU
improves they are gonna take 3rd in the Big-8.
OK, I'm saying it NOW. I absalutely, positively, WILL NOT MAKE ANY HUSKER/CU
PREDICTIONS. NO WAY. I WILL NOT TALK ABOUT THE GAME BEFOREHAND - PERIOD !!!
I will only post the Husker updates that I recieve in the mail. You all know
where I stand anyway. I'm just not gonna talk. You heard it here FIRST !!!
I'll only say that it could be a great game.
Now, Huskers vs KSU. I heard the 4th quarter score with NU down 7 and I
couldent hardly believe it. Soooooo, I quickly turned on the radio to the
Nebraska Football Network (Thank you Coloradans for Nebraska and AM 1060
out of Longmont, CO). Yes it was true, 7 min to go and KSU up 7 and attempting
a 32 yard field goal. I barely missed. Yesssssss !!! From this point on it
was the Huskers FINALLY showing some character. 2 long drives (65 yard'ish)
for TD's moving it both in the air and on the ground. Winning TK scored with
about 2:47 left. KSU moves the ball in the air to the NU 7. They can't get it
in. 3 incompletes in a row. Game over, Huskers avert the upset of the century.
Actually it wouldent have been the upset of the century. KSU is greatly
improved and they executed their game plan:
Exploit NU's weakness - pass like crazy with no interceptions
Keep NU's offense off the field. Time of possesion very lopsided
in favor of KSU.
It almost worked. Give KSU credit. I do however think that this game helped
Nebraska. It showed them that they CAN come back. They can win when the chips
are down. They can come thru in the clutch. I'm also sure that the Huskers
will continue to work on the secondary. They have to get better. Maybee it's
defensive coordinator Charlie McBride that should be run out of town and
tar's & feathered, and not Osborne?
Anyway, I'm just glad the good guys in the white hats won.
Nebraska (whoa boy) Marty
|
18.278 | Husker Notes 21-Oct-1991 | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:29 | 61 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 21-OCT-1991 08:32:10.95
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 21st
Husker Notes, Oct 21st
Lingering controversy from the NU-K State game:
Tom Osborne said on his Sunday night TV show that he thought the play where
FB Lance Lewis was stripped of the ball by C. J. Masters, who then romped
40 yards for a go-ahead touchdown in the 3rd quarter Saturday, was 'too close
to call' on the film. At the time it happened, Osborne ran 10 yards onto
the field to 'consult' with the officials. The radio announcers speculated
that the Huskers may have thought the play had been blown dead.
Also, Kansas State's 32 yard 4th quarter field goal attempt (which would have
given them a 10 point lead) was pretty close. Several K. State players
contended it was good, but the referee disagreed.
ESPN will carry the Nebraska-Colorado game on Nov 2nd. The kickoff time has
been changed to 6:30 pm CST. The Nov 29th Oklahoma-NU game is being televised
by ABC.
Despite a hard-fought game, there were apparently no serious injuries in the
K State game. 2nd string right defensive tackle Brian Brown and reserve
center Terris Chorney both have had knee problems since last spring and had
arthroscopic knee surgery on Saturday. Brown will be out until at least the
Oklahoma game, Chorney is done for the year, said trainer George Sullivan.
Kenny Wilhite saw more action than originally planned on Saturday, even though
his shoulder is still bothering him. He was instrumental in breaking up a
pass into the end zone on Kansas State's final drive in the game.
Osborne had been avoiding calling the triple option play with Keithen McCant,
since it requires the quarterback to make two reads instead of just one.
Instead, a 'double option' with a predetermined fake to the fullback has
been used. Saturday, though, a triple option with FB Lance Lewis getting
the ball resulted in an important 25 yard gain to the K State 1 on the
Husker's final scoring drive. Keithen also scored a first-quarter TD on an
option play.
Fran ten Bensel's 2nd place finish helped the Nebraska women to a 4th place
fininsh in the Mini National Cross Country Meet on Saturday in State College,
PA. Nebraska is currently ranked 21st.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA01438; Mon, 21 Oct 91 07:31:47 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09610; Mon, 21 Oct 91 09:31:53 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Oct 91 09:27 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 21st
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Mon, 21 Oct 91 9:27:09 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.279 | Hagan for the Heisman | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:48 | 27 |
| Huge win for the Buffaloes at Norman(34-17). The highlights were 2 99 yard TD
drives. The first came just after the Sooner's scored the first TD and
were threatening to blow the game open. The second came in the 3rd quarter
when OU was trying to come back from a 10 point deficit. Before this game,
Oklahoma had the nation's 2nd and the Big 8's 1st rated defense. Hagan had
a terrific day passing and running. All talk of Cale Gundy being the best
QB in the Big 8 was put to rest.
I don't think Gibbs will be the OU coach next year. There's a lot of pressure
to get a new coach in Norman. However, I don't think it will matter much
who they get for a coach. This year's team is senior dominated. The talent
for the sophmore and junior player's were hurt badly by probation. It's
going to be tough for OU to become a national power again.
Marty, what happened in Lincoln ? Kansas State almost beat the Husker's
in Lincoln on Homecoming weekend. Is Kansas State really that good ?
You have to give a lot of credit to Kansas State for turning around the
worst football team in the Big 8 into a legitimate threat. CU has to play
them at Kanasa State next weekend. They'll probably be fired up after
their near win at Lincoln. I hope CU doesn't take them too lightly.
Kansas has also been a big surprise this year. They clobbered Okla State
by 41-0.
In 2 weeks, the Husker's will visit Folsom prison and tangle with the Buffs.
Keith
|
18.280 | Hukser/KSU pointer... | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:55 | 5 |
| re: -1 Marty, what happened in Lincoln?
Keith, see note 18.277.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.281 | Husker vs K State stats... | NORDIK::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:00 | 109 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 20-OCT-1991 11:36:55.20
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: NU vs K State
Nebraska 38, Kansas State 31
Journal-Star columnist Mike Babcock referred to it as 'the largest crowd
ever to watch the end of a Nebraska-Kansas State football game'. This
may well have been true, because the last time Kansas State won at Nebraska
in 1968 (which was also Homecoming), Memorial Stadium seated fewer people
because the pressbox had not yet been built. The last time Kansas State
came within 10 points of Nebraska was in 1979. The odds-makers didn't take
K State's 4-1 record seriously either, installing them as 30+ point underdogs.
Kansas State's 31 points was their best-ever against Nebraska, but after
Kansas State's kicker missed a 32 yare field goal attempt which would have
given them a 10 point lead, the relieved Husker fans got to see Nebraska score
twice in the last seven minutes in a come-from-behind win, the likes of which
have been few and far between for the Huskers lately.
The go-ahead score came with just 2:47 left in the game, at which point the
Blackshirt defense had to hold on to the finish, something they had been
notably unsuccessful at doing all day long, especially on third down
conversions.
With less than a minute to play, Kansas State had driven to the Nebraska 7
and had second down and six yards to go. Three passes fell incomplete to
finish the game.
Derek Brown, who reinjured a thigh injury, sat out a large portion of the
game, but returned for the final two drives, rushing for 145 yards and three
touchdowns overall. Keithen McCant also had 100 yards rushing.
Scoring and statistics:
Kansas State 7 10 14 0 - 31
Nebraska 14 3 7 14 - 38
KSU - M. Smith 7 yd pass from Watson (Wright kick)
NU - D. Brown 1 yd run (Bennett kick)
NU - McCant 32 yd run (Bennett kick)
KSU - Wright 26 yd FG
KSU - Smith 11 yd pass from Watson (Wright kick)
NU - Bennett 33 yd FG
KSU - Masters 40 yd fumble return (Wright kick)
NU - Mitchell 4 yd pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
KSU - Watson 3 yd run (Wright kick)
NU - D. Brown 3 yd run (Bennett kick)
NU - D. Brown 1 yd run (Bennett kick)
KSU NU
First downs 26 22
Rushes-yards 34-112 55-363
Passing yards 340 107
Total yards 452 470
Return yards 91 21
Passing 26-46-0 8-13-1
Punts 6-42.1 5-39.4
Fumbles-lost 1-0 1-1
Penalties-yards 6-45 6-52
Time of possession 33:33 26:27
3rd-down conversions 8-17 2-9
4th-down conversions 0-1 1-1
(Attendance figure not given)
Individual stats:
Rushing
NU - D. Brown 28-145, McCant 13-100, Lewis 6-79, C. Jones 6-46, Turner 2- -7
KS - Gallon 13-47, Coleman 1-23, Watson 16-19, Madden 3-12, Smith 1-11
Passing, NU--McCant 8-13-1, 107 yards
KS--Watson 26-46-0, 340 yards
Receiving
NU - Bostick 3-46, Mitchell 2-45, Hughes 1-9, D. Brown 2-7
KS - Smith 10-172, Gallon 6-82, Campbell 3-34, Hernandez 4-30, Benton 2-13,
Coleman 1-9
Punting, NU--Stigge 5-179 (39.4 average)
KS--Snyder 6-253 (42.1 average)
Punt returns
NU - Hughes 1-18, Dixon 1-3
KS - Smith 4-49
Kickoff returns
NU - Hughes 3-79, Turner 1-14, Mitchell 1-6
KS - Coleman 3-35, Madded 1- -1, Benton 1-20
Fumble returns, KS - Masters 1-40
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA12128; Sun, 20 Oct 91 10:36:26 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06591; Sun, 20 Oct 91 12:37:19 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Oct 91 12:12 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: NU vs K State
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Sun, 20 Oct 91 12:11:59 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.282 | Geez, OU's really putrid (but so were they 1981-83) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:20 | 48 |
|
> I don't think Gibbs will be the OU coach next year. There's a lot of pressure
> to get a new coach in Norman. However, I don't think it will matter much
> who they get for a coach. This year's team is senior dominated. The talent
> for the sophmore and junior player's were hurt badly by probation. It's
> going to be tough for OU to become a national power again.
From everything I've read this year and what I saw personally last year,
Gibbs' game coaching abilities are absolutely atrocious. OU hasn't
been televised up here in the Northeast yet (CBS losing football and
ABC's regional telecast format really stinks), but it sounded like the
Texas game was lost in large part because Gibbs chose to sit on the
ball with a slim lead when it became clear the Longhorns were unable
to do anything on offense. Say what you will about our dear departed
friend Barry Switzer, but he was *not* conservative. He'd have that
ball flying around in the backfield for anyone to take it, but at least
he'd usually properly utilize OU's talents and strengths.
Right now, until further notice or Gibbs' dismissal, I have zero
confidence in the Sooners in any kind of a big game. A win versus
Nebraska would partially salvage the season (though it probably
wouldn't win the Big Eight as it would depend on a Colorado loss to
the Huskers and no other upsets the rest of the way), but I don't
see that happening. This program is down mentally, way down, under
Gibbs.
As for becoming a national power again, unless the university decides
that they want to de-emphasize athletics (ha!), I think the Sooners
will be back, although it might take awhile. They've still got many
of their contacts in place in Texas, and the competition from the
Texas college football programs right now is also at its nadir.
You've got to understand that unlike Colorado, and much like Nebraska,
Oklahoma football is much of the lives of the state's residents. It
grew out of their desire to remove the stigma of the state's Dust Bowl
years, and it's ingrained at this point. This kind of thing has
happened in OU's past and it'll probably happen again. The team of the
50s disappeared and hit rock bottom in the 60s (after something like
three separate probations), but they were back again strong as the
team of the 70s. As much as I'd like to say it isn't so, you've still
got these fat-cat oil-rich Okie alums running around with nothing
better to do than mess around in the lives of some kids. The program's
still packing the fans in and has the money and the backers to run a
top-flight operation, and as much as the NCAA may have made efforts to
change things and balance out the competition, those aspects are still
very much a reality in major-college athletics.
glenn
|
18.283 | It'll never happen but what if... | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:37 | 7 |
| What happens if Nebraska beats CU, OU beats Nebraska and all three win
the rest of their Big 8 games. Each would have a Big 8 record of 6-1-0.
In the above case, who goes to the Orange bowl and what is the determining
factor ?
Keith
|
18.284 | Can anyone in Big-8 land confirm? | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 22 1991 09:41 | 13 |
|
> What happens if Nebraska beats CU, OU beats Nebraska and all three win
> the rest of their Big 8 games. Each would have a Big 8 record of 6-1-0.
This is the (unlikely) scenario I was referring to and I assumed
that OU would be the team to go based on either or both of two
reasons: 1) with only two losses and the win in hand over Nebraska
they'd probably be the highest ranked of the three teams, thanks to
a creampuff schedule, and 2) they're the team that's been away
from the Orange the longest.
glenn
|
18.285 | Husker Notes 22-Oct-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Tue Oct 22 1991 12:01 | 88 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 22-OCT-1991 08:04:13.81
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes
Husker Notes, Oct 22nd
Although local reaction to the closeness of the Nebraska-Kansas State game
seems pretty subdued, national audiences heard disparaging comments from
analyst Beano Cook, who said that the 31 points K-State scored represents
'the start of the downfall' of Nebraska's season. Sports Illustrated has
also called the NU Sports Information Office, apparently in regards to a
story on how underdog Kansas State could play Nebraska so close.
(At least Osborne's job seems secure. A reporter asked Oklahoma AD
Donnie Duncan if it is time to issue a 'vote of confidence' in Sooner
coach Gary Gibbs, following OU's loss to Colorado.)
Two starters missed practice Monday, LG Erik Weigert has a jammed neck, LG
Pat Engelbert has a sore ankle. TE William Washington's hamstring is still
slowing him, but he did practice, as did I-back Derek Brown (bruised thigh),
SS Steve Carmer (jammed finger) and QB Mickey Joseph (knee).
K-State saftey C. J. Masters, who stripped NU FB Lance Lewis of the ball
and ran 40 yards for a TD Saturday, was named Big Eight Defensive Player
of the Week. He also intercepted a pass, setting up another TD.
The Freedom Bowl was interested in Kansas prior to their upset loss to K-State.
Kansas is leading the conference in total defense and 6th nationally, but
may need a win against Nebraska, Oklahoma, or Colorado to lock up a bowl bid.
NU is 14th in the New York Times Computer Ratings this week. Washington
remains #1, Colorado is 11th, Kansas State 25th.
Missouri showed a no-huddle offense against Oklahoma State for the first
time this season, which will keep the lights burning late in the NU
coaching offices this week.
The NU depth chart for this week reads as follows. A dash indicates players
are sharing that spot in the list. (From the World-Herald this week, so it
updates the specialists list.)
Split End: John Bostick, Tyrone Hughes, Dan Pleasant-Corey Dixon
Left Tackle: Lance Lundberg, Rob Zatechka
Left Guard: Erik Weigert, Chris Zyzda, Dave Jensen
Center: Bill Ziegelbein, Jim Scott
Right Guard: Will Shields, T.J. Slansky, Ken Mehlin
Right Tackle: Brian Boerboom, Zach Weigert, Ray Reifenrath
Tight End: William Washington, Daryl Liese-Johnny Mitchell, Chris Garrett
QB: Keithen McCant, Mickey Joseph, Tom Haase
FB: Lance Lewis, Tim Johnk, Robert Glanz, Andre McDuffy
IB: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, George Achola, Scott Baldwin
WB: Nate Turner, Abdul Muhammad, Vincent Hawkins, Mark Dowse
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett
Field Goals, extra points: Byron Bennett, Tom Sieler
Kickoffs: Bennett, Seiler
Deep Snapper: Jason Baker, Bill Ziegelbein
Holder: Mike Stigge, Tom Haase
Punt Returns: Corey Dixon, Tyrone Hughes, Vernon Powell, Steve Carmer
Kickoff Returns: Turner, Hughes, Dixon, Brown
Left Outside LB: Travis Hill, David Leader, Lance Gray
Left Tackle: Jamie Liewer, Kevin Ramaekers, Matt Hillman, Terry Connealy
Middle Guard: Pat Engelbert, David Noonan, Jerry Irons
Right Tackle: John Parella, Bruce Moore
Right Outide LB: David White, Trev Alberts, Donta Jones
Strongside LB: Mike Petko, Darren Williams, Troy Branch, Shane Geiken
Weakside LB: Mike Anderson, Ed Stewart, Paul Wightman, Doug Colman
Left CB: Curtis Cotton, Kenney Wilhite, Sedric Collins
Right CB: Tyrone Legette, Vernon Powell, Mike Heins
Strong Saftey: Steve Carmer, Ernie Beier, Troy Dumas
Free Saftey: Tyrone Byrd, John Reese, Lorenzo Brinkley
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA17219; Tue, 22 Oct 91 07:03:40 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04209; Tue, 22 Oct 91 09:05:07 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Oct 91 09:00 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Tue, 22 Oct 91 8:59:51 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.286 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:09 | 37 |
|
I was pleasantly surprised, not that CU won, but how convincingly they
were able to do it in Norman. CU has now won their last 3 road games
against OU or NU by 17, 15, and 17 points.
> The highlights were 2 99 yard TD
> drives. The first came just after the Sooner's scored the first TD and
> were threatening to blow the game open. The second came in the 3rd quarter
> when OU was trying to come back from a 10 point deficit.
These were both keys, probably the first one moreso because it really
quieted the crowd. A couple other key factors were this: OU turned the
ball over in their own territory twice and CU converted those TO's into
14 points. CU turned the ball over in their own territory twice but OU
only turned those TO's into 3 points. The were talking over in the Big
10 file about the bad officiating in the IU-Michigan game, but the
officiating in this game couldn't have been much better. Maybe not
alot of bad calls but the officials were always huddling and slowing
the game down.
> I don't think Gibbs will be the OU coach next year.
Agreed. Even if he manages to still win 8 or 9 games, they have to see
a trend here.
Glenn W., I agree that ABC's regional telecasts are poor. One of the
biggest problems is they are trying to cover too many games and are
spreading themselves too thin. And if someone back East wants to see a
Big 8 or PAC-10 game, or vice-versa, they're pretty much out of luck.
ESPN rarely has afternoon games anymore and NBC's coverage is
practically negligible with only 6 games the whole year.
Joe
|
18.287 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:28 | 27 |
| > They were talking over in the Big 10 file about the bad officiating
> in the IU-Michigan game, but the officiating in this game couldn't have
> been much better.
They did miss two important calls. On the first TD drive by OU, you could
clearly see the ball pop out of the hands of an OU running back as he was
being tackled. CU recovered in the pile up. The refs said that no fumble
occurred. But in all fairness, it looked like the refs view of the fumble
was blocked by some of the CU players running to make the tackle. An
instant replay may have reversed the call but pleeez, we don't need
instant replay in college football.
The other blown call was on the double pass, Hagan to Westbrook to Hagan.
There were offensive lineman illegally downfield. On the coach McCartney
show, Mac even said the Buffs were lucky on that play. But all in all,
the refs were always in control, the 2 calls evened out and for the most
part, it was a very well officiated game.
> Glenn W., I agree that ABC's regional telecasts are poor. One of the
> biggest problems is they are trying to cover too many games and are
> spreading themselves too thin.
Truer words were never spoken. I'll take a Denver channel 4 broadcast
with Les Shapiro and Dave Logan any day over the horrible coverage by
ABC.
Keith
|
18.288 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:58 | 22 |
| > They did miss two important calls. On the first TD drive by OU, you could
> clearly see the ball pop out of the hands of an OU running back as he was
> being tackled. CU recovered in the pile up. The refs said that no fumble
> occurred. But in all fairness, it looked like the refs view of the fumble
> was blocked by some of the CU players running to make the tackle.
Keith, I do remember a fumble by OU on that drive but it was recovered
by OU. The OU player fumbled and a CU guy fell on it, but he never got
posession and bounced off the CU player's chest right back into the
hands of the OU guy laying on the ground. It was a weird play and did
at first appear to be recovered by CU but was recovered by the Sooners.
RE: KSU-NU
As I kept hearing updates of the KSU-NU score throughout the afternoon
I was salivating at the prospect of reading Marty's notes Monday
morning after KSU had upset NU, in Lincoln no less. But I'm actually
glad that NU pulled it out so we will have a battle of the only
undefeated teams in the conference in 2 weeks, assuming both avoid the
upset this week of course.
Joe
|
18.289 | Big 8 Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 17:39 | 20 |
| Conf. All
Nebraska 2-0 5-1
Colorado 2-0 4-2
Kansas 1-1 4-2
Kansas St. 1-1 4-2
Oklahoma 1-1 4-2
Missouri 1-1 3-2-1
Iowa St. 0-2 2-4
Oklahoma St. 0-2 0-6
This week's games & spreads:
Colorado (-18) at Kansas State
Kansas (+15) at Oklahoma
Missouri (-21.5) at Nebraska
Oklahoma State (-7) at Iowa State
Joe
|
18.290 | NU +21 over a good passing team ????????? | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:20 | 11 |
| re: -1
I think Mizzou -21 to Nebraska is a very bad bet. Mizzou has decent passing
ability and we all know about the Huskers secondary.
Plus the fact that MU has traditionally given the Big Red of the North tuff
games most years. It's sort of a rivalry.
I look for this one to be close going into the 4th.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.291 | Husker Notes, Oct 24th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:30 | 66 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 24-OCT-1991 18:47:25.16
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 24th
Husker Notes, Oct. 24th
Tom Osborne says it unusual to be six games into the season and not really
sure how good his team is. "Part of the problem is how you hit someone
on a given day. Washington had two weeks to get ready for us and it showed.
Colorado had two weeks to get ready for Missouri and they ran a complete
option package at them and won easily. We guessed that Oklahoma State
would blitz us and we guessed right."
Osborne added that he is pleased with the confidence and character of his
'91 squad. And after a close game with Kansas State, Osborne says his
players have learned to avoid taking any opponent lightly.
Tight End William Washington is still being bothered by a hamstring injury,
and will probably miss the Missouri game. Linebacker Matt Hillman has
a jammed neck. FB Lance Lewis and I-back Derek Brown both missed practice
Tuesday and Wednesday with the flu. FB Omar Soto, who broke a leg in the
3rd game of the season, is jogging and may return by the Iowa State game
on Nov 16th.
The Huskers are 1st in rushing offense, 3rd in total offense, 4th in scoring
offense, but 34th in rushing defense, 55th in pass efficiency defense, and
57th in scoring defense. Four of Nebraska's six opponents so far have had
their best game of the season against the Huskers, but two of the opposing
quarterbacks (CSU's Verdugo and ASU's Powers) had their worst games of
the season against Nebraska.
Negotiations with Wyoming and Weber State to fill the open date in the 1992
schedule have fallen through, leaving only an offer from Southwest
Louisiana to host the Huskers.
The pre-season coaches poll has tabbed Kansas to win the Big Eight Women's
Basketball crown, followed by Colorado, Oklahoma State, and then Nebraska.
Karen Jennings, a junior forward for the Huskers, was named preseason
player-of-the-year.
The 1991 Big Eight conference Volleyball tournament will be in Omaha on
Nov 29-30th. The Huskers took 1 hour 13 minutes on Tuesday to beat Kansas
State 15-3, 15-9, 15-7 before 2177 spectators. This Saturday's match
against Colorado in Boulder will play a major role in determining the
conference title. The Buffs are 6-1, the Huskers 7-0 in conference matches.
The Nebraska School Activities Association is considering sanctioning
girls fast pitch softball as a high school sport.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA05786; Thu, 24 Oct 91 17:46:56 -0700
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06242; Thu, 24 Oct 91 19:48:52 CD
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Oct 91 19:01 CD
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 24th
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Thu, 24 Oct 91 19:01:26 CDT
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.292 | Big 8 predictions of the week | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:42 | 31 |
| Here's my predictions for this week:
Colorado (-18) at Kansas State - K State is primarily a passing team.
CU has done a good job of defensing the pass all year. K State
has, at best, an average defense, while CU's balanced offense has
improved dramatically in the last few weeks. K State may be pumped up
after their near win in Lincoln. With their improvement of the last
2 years, they have much to be proud about. However, even with the home
field advantage, K State will lose to CU 45-14.
Kansas (+15) at Oklahoma - Gibbs must win this one big to even have
a remote chance of keeping his job next year. He's got the home
field advantage which should help but the morale on his team must
be at an all time low after losing 2 in a row to teams they were
favored to beat. The Sooners win but don't beat the point spread.
Final score - 28-14
Missouri (-21.5) at Nebraska - With K State passing for over 300 yards
against Nebraska last week, everyone knows that Nebraska has a
weakness in it's secondary. Missouri is a good passing team but
just like K State it won't be able to stop the Husker's offense.
The Tiger's will score more points than most people expect but still
come up way short. Final score Huskers 42, Tigers 20.
Oklahoma State (-7) at Iowa State - Will anybody show up for this
game ? What happened to these 2 teams this year. Iowa State had a
pretty good team last year when they beat Oklahoma and played CU
tough for 3 quarters. The Cowboys have always been known for their
great running backs and their upset capability. But this year, both
teams have reached new lows. Iowa State 24, Oklahoma State 7.
Keith
|
18.293 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:52 | 31 |
| > Kansas (+15) at Oklahoma - Gibbs must win this one big to even have
> a remote chance of keeping his job next year.
This is a game that Kansas needs to win if they want to live up to
their preseason expectations of going to a bowl. If KU can win this
game and lose to only CU and NU they will go 7-4 with a win over the
Sooners and probably end up in a minor bowl. What it comes down to is
KU needs to beat one of the 'big 3' in order to win 7 games and this
may be their best chance to do so.
As for Gibbs, he probably needs to beat OU or at least win his bowl
games to have a good chance to stick. But a loss to the Jayhawks could
seal his fate.
> Oklahoma State (-7) at Iowa State - Will anybody show up for this
> game ? What happened to these 2 teams this year.
ISU has had injury problems at quarterback. If ISU doesn't win some
games the rest of this season Walden may be gone. OSU was supposed to be
bad, but I thought they'd be doing a little better than they are right
now.
RE: CU at KSU
I just don't think CU will have much trouble here, mainly for 3
reasons: CU's loss to Stanford woke 'em up; now that CU has beaten OU
they know they have the inside track to the Orange Bowl and are
focused; KSU will suffer a letdown after the near-miss at NU.
Joe
|
18.294 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 25 1991 14:12 | 13 |
| Preseason Big 8 basketball media poll:
1. Oklahoma State
2. Kansas
3. Oklahoma
4. Missouri
5. Kansas State
6. Nebraska
7. Iowa State
8. Colorado
Joe
|
18.295 | "Inside Track" my you know what... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Oct 25 1991 15:07 | 93 |
| re: . RE: CU at KSU
> I just don't think CU will have much trouble here, mainly for 3
> reasons: CU's loss to Stanford woke 'em up; now that CU has beaten OU
> they know they have the inside track to the Orange Bowl and are
> focused; KSU will suffer a letdown after the near-miss at NU.
> Joe
Excuse me Joe, but how can you say CU has the
"inside track to the Orange Bowl"
????????????????????????????
Is this your CU/NU prediction? Or are you saying that CU now has the edge
because they have already played OU and NU still has to play both OU and CU?
In both this notesfile and in the USENET I'm getting the impresion from many
CU fans that they feel their team has "arrived" now. This based on a blowout
of Mizzou, a strong win over Oklahoma, and the Husker/KSU game.
At this point in the season all I can say is:
* * C A R E F U L L * *
It's too early for that. Consider these factors:
OU is unproven. They lost to a very average Texas team, then were
overpowered by a CU team which STILL HASENT BEATEN ANYONE OF MERRIT
YET.
CU fans are saying that CU now gas a great passing game based on
the OU game. Well I tell ya, OU is not a good defense against the
pass. They never have been and still arent. You can't gauge your
own passing game on results vs OU in the air.
CU is still young. They havent shown any come from behind ability
as last years vetern squad did. What if Nebraska has them down
12 in the 4th quarter? Would this young team have the ability of
last years team to come back? The Baylor and Stanford games say no.
And remember 1 important factor about the Okie's game:
OU is not a comeback team due to a bad passing game. In the
1st quarter of the OU/CU game OU was inept. Fumbled punt,
a very poorly thrown interception (and the play before that
was thrown right into a CU mans hands and dropped) and CU
is up quickly on a team which does not have good comeback
ability. Stop and think for a moment if OU had not self-
destructed in that 1st quarter? It would have been a totally
different game.
Mizzou. Remember that CU had at least as much mental motivation from
the 5th down game as did Mizzou. That game dogged CU team last year
as many accross the nation (no, not just in Nebraska) have stated
that a team which needed a 5th down to bean MU should not be natl.
champs. And, yes, it was not CU's fault it happend (although McArtney's
arrogant, stubborn attitude did not help CU's cause one bit) so CU
felt jepordized also. So given that MU did not have any mental edge
over CU, I'd say that this was just a case of a better team beating
a much worse team. Can't gauge anything by this game. Look at last
year. CU eeks out a disputed win over MU. Nebraska totally buried MU
BY something like 50 - 7 or so? Then CU beats NU in the Sea of Red.
This brings us to the NU/KSU game...
Don't gauge anything by this EXCEPT that Nebraska's secondary must
get better and KSU is improved. This brings us back to last year again.
The CU fans in here preached at me before the NU/CU game that NU was
unproved. That NU's weaknesses had not been yet exposed because they
haddent played anyone. It turned out to be true. This year it is not
true for Nebraska. They have played a team that many feel is the best
and everyone feels is one of the 3 best. This exposed NU's problems.
Some of those problems came out against a pretty good ASU team and
a decent KSU team. They managed to win 2 of those 3 AND find out what
they need to work on also. Since it is generally conceded that NU
has improved itself this year over last year AND has played a decent
schedule, AND has actually had a character building come from behind
4th quarter win - I'D SAY THAT PROCLAIMING CU AS THE "INSIDE TRACK"
TO THE ORANGE BOWL AT THIS POINT IN THE SEASON IS PREMATURE AND
POSSIBLE JUST PLAIN INACCURATE.
Time may change that statement. I don't know. As I said, I'm not making any
predictions, my point is that to assume CU has an edge over Nebraska at this
point is popycock. Many of the CU fans need to listen to what they told ME
last year.
Actually I hope that CU pounds KSU without mercy and Mizzou gives NU a close
(but not down to the wire) game Saturday. Build up the ego's and overconfidence
of the CU folks to high levels and set'em up for a potential big fall.
GO BIG RED !!!
Bugeater Marty
|
18.296 | Don't kid yourself: CU *does* have the inside track | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 25 1991 17:17 | 63 |
|
> Excuse me Joe, but how can you say CU has the
>
> "inside track to the Orange Bowl"
>
> ????????????????????????????
>Is this your CU/NU prediction? Or are you saying that CU now has the edge
> because they have already played OU and NU still has to play both OU and CU?
No, it's not my NU-CU prediction, but I'll give it to you anyway - CU
will beat Nebraska! While we're at it, I think CU will win by at least
10. There, you've got.
Now of course CU has the inside track because they've already beaten OU
and NU hasn't. You even figured it out yourself. OU may be down but
they're still one of the top 3 teams in the conference.
> OU is unproven.
As they were last year. And the NU-OU result was.......?
> CU team which STILL HASENT BEATEN ANYONE OF MERRIT
> YET.
As hasn't Nebraska.
> OU is not a comeback team due to a bad passing game. In the
> 1st quarter of the OU/CU game OU was inept. Fumbled punt,
> a very poorly thrown interception (and the play before that
> was thrown right into a CU mans hands and dropped) and CU
> is up quickly on a team which does not have good comeback
> ability. Stop and think for a moment if OU had not self-
> destructed in that 1st quarter? It would have been a totally
> different game.
FYI CU drove the ball 99 yards down OU's throat trailing 7-0 at a point
when the crowd was still very much a part of the game. This may have
very well been the turning point of the game. And as was mentioned in
one of my previous notes, OU turned the ball over in their own
territory twice and CU cme away with 14 points. CU turned the ball
over twice in their own territory and OU came away with 3 points. CU
took advantage of opportunities whereas OU didn't. That's how you win
games.
> Mizzou. Remember that CU had at least as much mental motivation from
> the 5th down game as did Mizzou. That game dogged CU team last year
> as many accross the nation (no, not just in Nebraska) have stated
> that a team which needed a 5th down to bean MU should not be natl.
> champs.
Ah yes, of course we remember the 5th down against Missouri. How can
we forget? But we also remember that it didn't take CU 5 downs to beat
Nebraska.
> AND has actually had a character building come from behind
> 4th quarter win -
Yea, against a much improved but still nowhere near top-20-level KSU
team - at home. Boy, that sure must've built their confidence.
Joe
|
18.297 | I'm not convinced... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Oct 25 1991 18:01 | 20 |
| ALRIGHT !!! Things are starting to heat up for the NU/CU game.
As usual Joe, you and I are diametricaly opposed as regards NU/CU. This will
not change. You see it as you see it and I see it as I see it.
We may possibly both be missing the forest for the tree's. Time will tell.
IMHO you made some good points in your note but nothing to convice that
CU has the "inside track." I will admit that CU is improving as the weeks
go by. That does not supprise me.
As I stated in a previous note. I will not predict this one. NU's D will have
to rise to the occasion is about the only direct statement I'll make.
I'm in a class all next week so you won't be hearing much from me. I'll
probably still post the "Husker Updates" I get via mail from Lincoln.
GO BIG RED, GO BIG RED, GO BIG RED, GO BIG RED...
Nebraska Marty
|
18.298 | CU-K State summary | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:11 | 34 |
| It sure wasn't pretty, but at least it was a win. In the first half,
K State was able to move the ball well until they got around the CU 20
yard line. Then, the CU defense shut the door. CU scored a TD in the 1st
half shortly after a botched K State snap deep in their territory. That was
about the only offense CU showed in the first half although redshirt
freshman, Michael Westbrook and freshman Lamont Warren showed signs of
future stardom. Warren gained around 120 yards and had one terrific TD
run called back on a holding penalty. I think Westbrook caught 9 passes and
it looks like he's becoming Hagan's favorite receiver. Once he catches the
ball, he's very tough to bring down, so he was used a lot in 3rd down
situations. It didn't look like CU's offensive line did a good job. There
never was a whole lot of running room and Hagan had a number of passes
batted down. Early in the game, Hagan threw a perfect bomb to Charles
Johnson but he dropped the pass.
The 2nd half was just as boring as the 1st half. However, this time,
CU shut down the K State offense completely. Leonard Renfro had 3 sacks
which doubled his carrer total. CU was able to move the ball a little
better but never was able to dominate K State. K State has definately
moved up from the worst team in the Big 8 to the 4th best team. They
even have an outside shot of getting a bowl bid. Their coaching staff
has done a terrific job.
I think think CU will play with some more intensity this week against
the Huskers.
Did anybody else notice that Denver's channel 4 moved the CU game to
UHF channel 20 (very poor reception for me) in order to play the
Notre Dame/USC game on Channel 4. This really pissed me off, that CU got
pre-empted by Notre Dame. I wonder if this was a Channel 4 decision or
if it was something shoved down their throat by NBC. I mean, this is
Buffalo country, isn't it. I think I'll write them a letter.
Keith
|
18.299 | The heat is on. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:42 | 36 |
| Marty, I'll admit that you're right about one thing. Things are starting to
heat up for the Buffalo-Husker war in Folsom prison. Joe made some good
points in his last reply but there are a few things I can't let go.
> CU fans are saying that CU now gas a great passing game based on
> the OU game. Well I tell ya, OU is not a good defense against the
> pass. They never have been and still arent. You can't gauge your
> own passing game on results vs OU in the air.
Going into the CU game, statistically, I believe OU was rated #2 in the
country and #1 in the Big 8 against the pass. Granted, they hadn't played
anybody as good as CU but still had some great success against the pass
including Texas. Also, the OU secondary is very experienced. Most of the
secondary started last year and most are seniors. I've got a tape of the
CU-OU game and I can gaurantee you that on all 3 Hagan TD passes, the
coverage was very tight. Hagan just threw a perfect pass each time. He also
hit alternate receivers on many of his passes. Hagan is a money QB who
plays great in the big games. And now he has three quality receivers with
Mark Henry, Michael Westbrook and Sean Brown.
> CU is still young. They havent shown any come from behind ability
> as last years vetern squad did. What if Nebraska has them down
> 12 in the 4th quarter? Would this young team have the ability of
> last years team to come back?
As Joe already pointed out, CU drove that ball 99 yards, not once, but
twice. Both drives came at critical times in a very hostile environment.
If that isn't playing well under pressure, I don't know what is. I can't
think of any other game that I've watched where a team had 2 99 yard
drives in one game against a quality opponent.
I'm not ready to give my detailed prediction for the CU-NU game yet other
than to say I think it will be a great game, maybe even better than the game
2 years ago.
Keith
|
18.300 | 3 in a row over the Huskers! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 28 1991 13:07 | 40 |
| > Michael Westbrook and freshman Lamont Warren showed signs of
> future stardom. Warren gained around 120 yards and had one terrific TD
> run called back on a holding penalty. I think Westbrook caught 9 passes and
> it looks like he's becoming Hagan's favorite receiver.
I've also noticed Westbrook has been looking, and there's no doubt that
Warren will be the starting tailback for CU for the next 3 years. Did
you notice that Kahl didn't play at all against KSU? BTW, Westbrook
has 7 catches for 91 yards.
> It didn't look like CU's offensive line did a good job.
I caught some of the post-game on the radio and they were saying the
same thing.
> I think think CU will play with some more intensity this week against
> the Huskers.
Understatement of the year, Keith.
> Did anybody else notice that Denver's channel 4 moved the CU game to
> UHF channel 20 (very poor reception for me) in order to play the
> Notre Dame/USC game on Channel 4. This really pissed me off, that CU got
> pre-empted by Notre Dame. I wonder if this was a Channel 4 decision or
> if it was something shoved down their throat by NBC.
I think you're right, it had something to do with NBC forcing them to
do so. During the week the Channel 4 sports announcers were saying the
game would be on 20 and not 4, but they had kind of a smirk on their
face when they said that so I kind of figured it wasn't their choice.
I'm kind of surprised that ABC didn't want the Nebraska-CU game. Their
premier game this week is Florida at Auburn and the other choices
aren't that great. We'll probably get stuck with some Pac-10 game. :^(
I'd rather see Florida-Auburn. Anyway, I'm glad ESPN has it because I
prefer a night game and ESPN does a great job on their Saturday night
telecasts.
Joe
|
18.301 | Big 8 Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 28 1991 14:29 | 20 |
| Conf. All
Nebraska 3-0 6-1
Colorado 3-0 5-2
Oklahoma 2-1 5-2
Kansas 1-2 4-3
Kansas St. 1-2 4-3
Missouri 1-2 3-3-1
Iowa St. 0-2-1 2-4-1
Oklahoma St. 0-2-1 0-6-1
This week's games & spreads:
Nebraska (+4) at Colorado
Iowa State (+13) at Missouri
Kansas (-6.5) at Oklahoma State
Kansas State (+22) at Oklahoma
Joe
|
18.302 | Team competition make everybody better | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Oct 28 1991 15:10 | 42 |
| > Did you notice that Kahl didn't play at all against KSU?
Yep, I did notice that. Kent Kahl is a very good running back but I just
don't think he has the talent that Lamont Warren has and Mac has seen
the light. One other thing I really like about Warren is that, unlike
Bieniemy, he is not fumble prone. He has a total of 1 fumble for the
season. When you look at him, he looks like a tall skinny kid. He's only
195 lbs which isn't all that big. But he obviously has lot's of power
which was shown on his TD run that was called back. He literally carried
3 defenders on his back for the last 8 or 9 yards to the end zone. He
almost looked like Earl Cambell on that play. If he stays healthy and
doesn't jump to the pro's, I think he'll be the most productive runner
CU has ever had, including Bieniemy.
Another position with some interesting team competition is at fullback.
James Hill had a concusion before the Oklahoma game so Scott Phillips
took his place and had a great game. It going to be hard not to give
Phillips more playing time. Hill appears to have excellent power and
blocks very well. Phillips appears to be an excellent receiver.
Then there is freshman and high school All American, Kendall Bussey.
He hasn't shown me anything yet but he obviously has talent to be so
highly recruited. Phillips is from Monument while Hill is from Widefield.
It's nice to see a couple of local guys playing well for CU.
>> It didn't look like CU's offensive line did a good job.
> I caught some of the post-game on the radio and they were saying the
> same thing.
One of their starting offensive linemen(can't remember his name) was
left back in Boulder since he was having some academic problems. Hopefully,
he'll make some prgress in his classes and be ready for the big showdown
on Saturday. They obviously didn't play with the intensity of the week
before. The offensive line is my biggest concern going into the Husker
game.
One of the Denver paper's had an article on Michael Westbrook. They said
that last year he worked out with the CU basketball team and this year,
he may try out for the team. Evidently, he broke 3 backboards while doing
slam dunks.
Keith
|
18.303 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Oct 28 1991 18:07 | 256 |
| I'm in school all week so I'm not going to have time for anything more
than generic postings such as this.
GO BIG RED !!!
Nebraska Marty
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!infopiz!mccall!mccall!scott
From: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Eight Review(10-28-91)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 28 Oct 91 19:37:52 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Lines: 236
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: scott
Colorado 10 Kansas State 0
Well, K-State blew another chance at a win. KSU's defense played
extremely well. The only TD scored was a 13yd drive by the Buffalos
setup when Watson fumbled a snap. The Wildcats had driven inside
CU's 25 five times:two missed FGs, two interceptions and one fumble.
Much to CU's credit, they only allowed the Wildcats on their side
of the field once in the second half. Colorado dominated the second
half with good defensive pressure on KSU's quarterbacks. CU used
mainly a 4-man rush that blew right by KSU's off.line. This gave the
Buffs 8(?) sacks on the day. But K-State did do the job defensively
themselves. They controlled Hagan for much of the day, although Warren
was running for 118yds. Snyder said this was the best defensive effort
he has seen since he came to KSU. Colorado players left impressed with
KansasSt but said they(KSU) were a few good players from being a good
team.
CU 0 7 3 0 -10
KSU 0 0 0 0 -0
CU Warren 7run(Harper kick)
CU 29FG Harper
CU KSU
First downs 20 18
Rushes-yards 52-207 40-118
Passing yards 132 165
Return 67 22
Passing 13-26-0 13-27-2
Punts 7-40 6-41
Fumbles-lost 1-1 2-2
Penalties 11-83 7-52
Time of poss 31:53 28:07
Attendance 31,987
Individual stats:
Rushing: CU-Warren 26-118, Hagan 15-46, Hill 9-38
KSU-Gallon 15-70, Madden 5-49, Sanft 2-12
Passing: CU-Hagan 12-25-0-122, Joseph 1-1-0-10
KSU-Watson 13-26-2-165, Smargiasso 0-1-0-0
Receiving: CU-Westbrook 7-91, Johnson 2-19, Brown 2-12
KSU-Smith 4-31, Gallon 2-33, Madden 2-32
-------------------------------------------
Missouri 3, Nebraska 63
What does beating Missouri by a wide margin and dominating the statistics
tell Nebraska coach Tom Osborne about his 1991 team? "It tells us we're
better than Missouri."
In a game where two Huskers had 100 yard days, McCant his 2nd straignt and
Brown his 7th, and 109 Huskers saw some action, Nebraska had one of its best
offensive performances of the season, and tied for its best defensive
performance. (The other 261 yard total was against Arizona State.)
Eight Husker players, including 4 I-backs, scored touchdowns. Nebraska also
had its first turnover-free game of the season, which pleased Osborne. "To
score eight times in a row -- those things happen. The big factor was no
turnovers and not very many penalties. If you do that, you're going to move
the ball on people."
Nebraska also had a lot of success on third-down (10-15) and fourth-down (2-2)
plays, while Missouri was 0-11 on third down conversions.
QB Keithen McCant said the Huskers weren't 'peeking' ahead to next week's
Colorado game. "Colorado wasn't on our mind today. It is now."
Missouri coach Bob Stull said, "They took control. I don't think it got out
of control."
Injuries on both sides: Missouri tailback Ronnell Kayhill, their second-leading
rusher, tore the medial collateral ligament in his right knee on the Tiger's
2nd offensive series and will undergo surgery on Monday. DE Stacy Elliott left
the game with a knee injury but it wasn't thought to be serious.
Nebraska held out TE William Washington, who has been nursing a hamstring
problem. I-back Scott Baldwin saw his first action since early in the season
opener, and possibly his last as well. Baldwin had 5 rushes for 28 yards and
a TD, but dislocated his shoulder scoring and will be out at least three weeks.
Scoring and statistics:
Missouri 3 3 0 0 -- 6
Nebraska 21 21 14 7 -- 63
MU - Jacke 42 yd FG
NU - Bostick 27 yd pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
NU - McCant 36 yd run (Bennett kick)
NU - D. Brown 5 yard run (Bennett kick)
MU - Jacke 47 yd FG
NU - Mitchell 7 yd pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
NU - C. Jones 5 yd run (Bennett kick)
NU - Hughes 21 yd pass from McCant (Bennett kick)
NU - D. Brown 5 yd run (Bennett kick)
NU - Baldwin 1 yd run (Sieler kick)
NU - Achola 7 yd run (Sieler kick)
MU NU
First downs 16 32
Rushes-yards 32-77 68-511
Passing yards 184 170
Total yards 261 681
Return yards 11 35
Passing 17-35-2 13-19-0
Punts 7-39.2 4-45.2
Fumbles-lost 3-1 1-0
Penalties-yards 4-32 4-36
Time of possession 25:02 34:58
Attendance: 76,244
Individual statistics:
Rushing
MU: M. Washington 11-48, Madison 7-23, Freeman 2-17, Tate 1-6
NU: McCant 9-124, D. Brown 18-118, Achola 7-58, C. Jones 10-51
Passing
MU: P. Johnson 15-29-1-169, Handy 2-6-1-15
NU: McCant 9-13-0-144, Joseph 3-5-0-19, Haase 1-1-0-7
Receiving
MU: Dunn 4-69, Madison 3-30, Leach 2-29, Holly 2-19, Hall 2-14
NU: Mitchell 3-36, Hughes 2-56, Bostick 2-34, Hawkins 1-11
-------------------------------------------
Oklahoma State 6 Iowa State 6
Sad Homecoming for Cyclone fans. This tie doesn't do any good for
either team. OSU's kicker,Myers, missed a 52yder with 1:16 left
that could've broken the tie, but was just short. This is ISU's
4th time in 5 games they couldn't reach the endzone and were TD-
less for the month of Oct. Both of ISU's top QBs are lost for the
season with shoulder injuries. OSU had a season high 356 in off.
yards but were charged with 7 penalties, 4 of them holding and one
was an intentional grounding that put the last FG attempt for Myers
just out of reach. Myers missed a 44-yder in the 1st half and had
another one blocked. ISU couldn't get a 1st down in the 3rdQ, put
together a drive from their own 20 to OSU's 17 when Caldwell, ISU's
3rd QB, had to leave the game after a hit. Stewart, ISU's kicker,
hit a 42-yder with 25 seconds left in the first half. Then OSU
marched 61yds in 24 seconds for Myers' 32yder. ISU did fumble
on a 3rd-n-goal from OSU's 1, which was the closest either team
came to scoring a TD.
OSU 0 3 3 0 -6
ISU 0 3 0 3 -6
ISU 42FG Stewart
OSU 32FG Myers
OSU 39FG Myers
ISU 31FG Stewart
OSU ISU
First downs 20 10
Rushes 46-158 42-108
passing 198 80
Returns 21 24
Passes 16-28-1 6-12-0
Punts 5-37 6-40
Fumbles 2-1 1-1
Penalties 7-55 7-55
Time of poss 34:04 25:56
Attendance 41,528
Rushing OSU-Berrien 23-72, Denson 14-52, Franks 5-46
ISU-Patterson 13-82, Caldwell 23-24
Passing OSU-Ford 16-28-1-198
ISU-Caldwell 6-12-0-80
Receiving OSU-Milliner 9-134, Kirksey 6-56
ISU Spencer 3-50
-------------------------------------------
Kansas 3 Oklahoma 41
OU jumped out quickly with a long punt return and a long reverse, both
which went for TDs in the 1st Q. To make matters worse, OU's receiver
Hall was left uncovered for his 68yd TD pass. Gaddis and Hilleary
went to the benches in the 3rdQ...Gaddis after a hit and Hilleary with
a migrane headache. Sands became KU's all-time rushing leader. Even
Dan Eichloff had an off day with punts of 12 and 18(although the 18yder
was partially blocked).
KU 0 3 0 0 -3
OU 14 20 0 7 -41
OU Taylor 58 punt return(Blanton kick)
OU Long 56run(Blanton kick)
OU Gaddis 4run(Blanton kick)
OU Gaddis 34run(Blanton kick)
OU Hall 68pass from Gundy(Blanton kick)
KU 43FG Eichloff
OU McDade 1run(Blanton kick)
KU OU
First Downs: 10 21
Rushes-yards 43-121 54-249
Passing yards 45 190
Return 30 65
Passing 6-16-0 10-15-0
Punts 11-36 5-44
Fumbles-lost 0-0 5-0
Penalties 6-48 4-35
Time of poss. 28:37 31:23
Attendance: 68,128
Rushing: KU-Sands 21-89, White 5-38, Robben 3-5
OU-Gaddis 14-88, McDade 17-72, Long 1-56
Passing: KU-Hilleary 5-10-0-39, Florell 1-6-0-6
OU-Gundy 8-12-0-175, S.Collins 2-3-0-15
Receiving: KU-Gay 2-16, Chandler 2-16, New 1-7
OU-Warren 5-82, Hall 3-99, Long 1-4
-------------------------------------------
Records
Team conf overall
NU 3-0-0 6-1-0
CU 3-0-0 5-2-0
OU 2-1-0 5-2-0
KU 1-2-0 4-3-0
KSU 1-2-0 4-3-0
MU 1-2-0 3-3-1
ISU 0-2-1 2-4-1
OSU 0-2-1 0-6-1
Games next week(11-2,times are CST)
NU @ CU(ESPN, 7:30???)
ISU @ MU(PrimeSport tape-delayed game)
KU @ OSU
KSU @ OU(1:00pm)
--
Scott D. Davis <[email protected]> The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!ksuvax1!deimos!mccall!scott) 615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041 Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
|
18.304 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 29 1991 11:45 | 13 |
| A couple of interesting tidbits regarding TV coverage:
ESPN will be carrying 3 football games from Colorado in a 4-day span
starting Thursday. Thursday night they have BYU at Colorado State,
Saturday night it's Nebraska at Colorado, and Sunday night it's
Pittsburgh at the Broncos.
The Big 8 will be a part of ESPN's Big Monday this year, replacing the
Big Ten as their 2nd game on Monday nights.
Joe
|
18.305 | ????????????????????? | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Oct 30 1991 10:13 | 18 |
| Last night on KOA Sportstalk call-in show, the announcer (I think the
voice of the Donco's) said that CU would win because:
CU's Defense is as good as last years Defense
CU's Offense is BETTER than last years
The Nebraska fan he was speaking to at the time about died laughing.
No predictions from this Husker fan. My prediction record is too lousy.
PLUS, I'm tired of eating CROW. I've had about every Crow dish that the
imagination can dream up. ;^)
Gonna get a pizza, send the wife shopping and watch this game with
intensity.
GO BIG RED !!!
Husker Henderson
|
18.306 | Husker Notes 29-Oct-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Oct 30 1991 10:15 | 68 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 29-OCT-1991 22:24:54.56
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 29th
Husker Notes, Oct 29th
The NU depth chart for this week reads as follows. A dash indicates players
are sharing that spot in the list.
Split End: John Bostick, Tyrone Hughes, Dan Pleasant-Corey Dixon
Left Tackle: Lance Lundberg, Rob Zatechka
Left Guard: Erik Weigert, Chris Zyzda, Dave Jensen
Center: Bill Ziegelbein, Jim Scott
Right Guard: Will Shields, T.J. Slansky, Ken Mehlin
Right Tackle: Brian Boerboom, Zach Weigert, Ray Reifenrath
Tight End: William Washington, Daryl Liese-Johnny Mitchell, Chris Garrett
QB: Keithen McCant, Mickey Joseph, Tom Haase
FB: Lance Lewis, Tim Johnk, Robert Glanz, Andre McDuffy Injured--Omar Soto
IB: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, George Achola Injured--Scott Baldwin
WB: Nate Turner, Abdul Muhammad, Vincent Hawkins, Mark Dowse
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett
K: Bennett, Tom Seiler
Left Outside LB: Travis Hill, David Leader, Lance Gray
Left Tackle: Jamie Liewer, Kevin Ramaekers, Terry Connealy
Middle Guard: Pat Engelbert, David Noonan, Jerry Irons
Right Tackle: John Parella, Bruce Moore, Matt Hillman Injured-Brian Brown
Right Outide LB: David White, Trev Alberts, Donta Jones
Strongside LB: Mike Petko, Darren Williams, Troy Branch, Shane Geiken
Weakside LB: Mike Anderson, Ed Stewart, Paul Wightman, Doug Colman
Left CB: Curtis Cotton, Kenney Wilhite, Sedric Collins
Right CB: Tyrone Legette, Mike Heins
Strong Saftey: Steve Carmer, Ernie Beier, Troy Dumas
Free Saftey: Tyrone Byrd, John Reese, Lorenzo Brinkley
NU QB Keithen McCant was named the Big Eight Offensive Player of the Week
for his performance against Missouri. NU outside hitter Janet Kruse was
named the Big Eight Conference volleyball player of the week, the third
Husker to win the honor twice this season.
Former NU basketball player Clifford Scales, cut by the NBA Golden State
Warriers last week, has signed to play with Sioux Falls of the Continental
Basketball Association.
The NCAA has announced it is placing some proposals to change the enforcement
process on the agenda of the January NCAA convention. Lincoln Journal
sportswriter Ken Hambleton credits Nebraska State Senator Ernie Chambers
as having brought the issue into the public eye, as Nebraska and then 11 other
states have passed laws requiring the NCAA to use due process in dealing
with schools under investigation. The often controversion Omaha Senator was
also the first legislator in the country to seek better rules for scholarship
athletes after an injury.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA29221; Tue, 29 Oct 91 21:25:53 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08269; Tue, 29 Oct 91 23:28:42 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 29 Oct 91 20:27 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 29 Oct 91 20:26 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 29th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.307 | Game Hype... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Oct 30 1991 10:22 | 21 |
| One factor in the NU/CU game is going to be the Nebraska Offensive
line.
They are ALMOST as big as the Stanford line and they are certainly
as strong (In the weighroom) as the Stanford boys. This is a switch
from last year when CU could litterly push the Huskers around because
the weight diff was about 30-40 lps per man on the line. This goes for
both sides of the ball.
Can Nebraska stop or slow down Hagens passing?
Can CU stop or slow down Nebraska's more balanced attack?
I think we are looking at a more even matchup this year than last.
One last factor...
I am almost always wrong !! ;^)
Nebraska Marty
|
18.308 | about 10 degrees with a chance of snow. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Wed Oct 30 1991 11:58 | 2 |
| The only major factor will be the SNOW and COLD.
|
18.309 | It will be a great game. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Oct 30 1991 12:03 | 65 |
| It looks like a new factor(weather) will enter the game. All of the
forecasts that I've seen predict more snow and cold weather. Since it
is a night game, the weather should be even colder than the players are
used to. Normally, bad weather will favor the team with the best lines and
running games. Here's the way I see the position to position comparisons:
Offensive line: NU leads the nation in rushing. Their offensive line
is a big reason for this. NU clearly comes out on
top in what may be the most important comparison
with the cold/snowy weather forecast.
Defensive line: CU is slightly better.
Running backs: Real close. However, NU has some more experience,
emphasizes the running game and leads the nation
in rushing. I give a very slight edge to NU.
QB: McCant and Hagan are both excellent QB's but Hagan
does everything a little better plus he's a proven
money player in the big games. Hagan is one of the
best if the not the best QB in college football.
Moderate edge to CU.
Receivers: Sure handed Mark Henry has recovered from his knee
injury and will be ready to play. Michael Westbrook
is maturing into one of the better receiver's in the
Big 8. Lamont Warren and Scott Phillips are also
excellent receiver's out of the backfield. Significant
edge to CU.
Tight Ends: NU's Mitchell is the best tight end in the Big 8.
CU's Sean Brown is experienced and has made numerous
clutch catches but isn't the greatest blocker. Edge
to NU.
Linebackers: Both teams were hit by graduation and the NFL draft.
CU linebackers are better against the pass but NU
linebackers play the run better. I'll call this one
a draw.
Secondary: Cris Hudson, Deion Figures, Eric Hamilton and company
have intimidated their opponents and made big plays
all year. CU has one of the better secondaries in
college football. Big edge to CU.
Special teams: Berger puts the ball in the endzone almost everytime
he kicks off. Hudson and Hagan are real threats to
run back a punt all the way. However, NU has been
returning punts very well lately. Slight edge to CU.
For CU to win, they must be able to move the ball through the air. They have
all the weapons to do this but the cold weather could hurt their passing
attack. If they can establish a passing game early, they can turn Lamont
Warren lose. If they start going 3 downs and out like they did against
Stanford, the NU 300 lb lineman will wear down the CU defense and it could be
a long night.
NU must play ball control football. If they can establish a good running
game, their passing attack will open up later in the game.
Final prediction: If the weather improves, CU wins by 10. If the weather
turns out to be cold and snowy as predicted, I see this game as even.
However, CU has the home field advantage. CU by 1.
Keith
|
18.310 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Oct 30 1991 13:39 | 31 |
| > Last night on KOA Sportstalk call-in show, the announcer (I think the
> voice of the Donco's)
The host of Sportstalk last night was Dave Logan, who does color for
the Bronco games. Larry Zimmer does play-by-play for both CU and the
Broncos.
RE: Weather
This will be a classic game played in the cold, at night, outdoors.
No half-full LA Coliseum with shirtless, lackluster fans lounging
around, none within 30 yards of the playing field. Nope, Folsom Field
will be packed solid with both CU and NU fans bundled up, many of them
only a few yard from the field, cheering loudly throughout the game.
National TV, night game, seeing the players' breath, and snow piled up on
the sidelines. With the exception of real grass, this will be real
football at its best. Enjoy. I know I will.
An important factor in the game will be how well NU keeps their
intensity up and not letting themselves get down if they get behind,
especially late in the game. That was a big factor in last year's game
- how NU lost so much steam after CU started coming back. It was kind of
like they expected to win easily after having the 12-0 lead.
The latest rumor going around regarding CU's opponent in the Orange
Bowl is that it will be the Miami-FSU loser. The OB reportedly has 6
teams on its wanted list: Miami, FSU, Florida, Notre Dame, Penn State,
and Alabama.
Joe
|
18.311 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Wed Oct 30 1991 14:00 | 5 |
|
Yeah right Marty, you eat crow like my kid eats his vegetables.....
Claybroon
|
18.312 | Husker Notes Oct-30-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 31 1991 10:53 | 39 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 31-OCT-1991 01:29:05.82
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 30th
The weather for the Colorado game is predicted to be awful, in case any of
you haven't looked outside or at a weather report lately. Boulder apparently
already has several inches of snow, with more forecast between now and
Saturday, and with cold and possibly snowy playing conditions it could make
the game interesting, to say the least.
The UNL Sports Information office has warned NU fans travelling to Boulder to
be wary of purchasing student tickets, because they might wind up sitting
in a hostile student section. (CU students got separate tickets for each
game for the first time this year.)
Reserve cornerback Vernon Powell is not going to Boulder becase of a groin
injury. FB Omar Soto and I-back Scott Baldwin may be able to play in two
weeks.
TE Chris Garrett is questionable for Saturday, as are TE's Darryl Leise and
Mike Vedral (who broke a collarbone Tuesday.) I-back Calvin Jones, who
got in a lot of playing time against Missouri, has a turf toe injury and
is only seeing limited practicing.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA01305; Thu, 31 Oct 91 00:30:29 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA12333; Thu, 31 Oct 91 02:33:46 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 30 Oct 91 23:56 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 30 Oct 91 23:56 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 30th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.313 | Should be a great game | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:34 | 14 |
| Hey Marty,
Why the warning to NU fans to be wary of purchasing CU student tix?
They'll have loads of fun in hostile student territory. Dat's
experiencin college foosball at its fever pitchin' best.
Whence I was a student at ND during the Bronze Age,once in a great
while some "Enemies" would sit among us. Sure there was razzing back
and forth but it was good fun. Don't remember seein any hooliganism.
Of course, we were in Nirvana wif our hootch-filled mini-wineskins.
I'd say if you can get tickets in the student section,Go For It!
They'll have a blast. BTW, any of you guys fortunate enough to
have tickets to this match? Trade ya my ND-Navy tix. 8^)
MikeL
|
18.314 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 31 1991 12:08 | 41 |
| > Why the warning to NU fans to be wary of purchasing CU student tix?
They were talking about this on the radio last night. Since the
students can get additional tickets this year there is a good chance
they will be trying to sell them. The warning is so NU fans are aware
that if they buy a ticket outside the stadium there's a good chance it
will be in the student section, and student sections are are much more
rowdier/vocal/obnoxious than the other sections. MikeL, I agree it
should be good fun (I sure had fun with those ND fans at the academy,
although they were getting a little PO'ed) but some people can take it
too far and unfortunately ruin things for both sides and give a team's
fans a bad rap. I caught some of Mac's weekly radio show as I was
driving home last night and he asked that all CU fans treat the
Nebraska people well, that they keep it in good fun, and show them that
Colorado has classy fans. He wants to beat Nebraska *on* the field.
But, unfortunately, there will be some jerks who will still cause
trouble and give many NU fans a bad opinion of CU fans in general.
> BTW, any of you guys fortunate enough to
> have tickets to this match? Trade ya my ND-Navy tix. 8^)
No, I don't, and I assume Marty or anybody else doesn't either or else
they'd have been talking about it all week. Besides Mike, you'd have
to do much, much better than ND-Navy.
RE: Weather
The latest forecast has it being in the teens or 20's during the game
with a slight chance of snow.
BTW, I hope all youse guys back east can see some of the BYU-CSU game
tonight (in addition to NU-CU on Saturday of course) and get a
much-maligned opinion that Colorado always gets snowstorms in October.
This is an aberration from the normal weather this time of year. Snow
really isn't that unusual for October, but this much of it combined
with it being so cold for so many days in a row is the unusual part.
If these games were a week or 2 ago fans would be at the games in
t-shirts or light coats....Just ask Jake! (Not that anybody cared
about any of this but I just felt like mentioning it. :^))
Joe
|
18.315 | I'm not responsible... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 31 1991 12:51 | 19 |
| re: .313
MikeL, I only forward the "Husker Updates," I don't write them.
The only think I can think of that could be a problem is this:
Cold night. Students smuggle alcohal in, get drunk, get
overly obnoxious, piss off Red clad faithfull.
.or.
Students overly obnoxious, NU fan overly defensive, conflict
arises.
I would not want, personally, to be a Husker fan in the CU student
section, and I would not want to be a Golden Buffhole fan in the NU
student section. (Hey, you guys callem "Cornholers" - eye for eye) ;^)
Bugeater Marty
|
18.316 | A KSU perspective... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Oct 31 1991 13:21 | 42 |
| A KSU fan from Mannhatten speaks out...
Article 6948
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!scott
From: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Nebraska vs. Colorado
Keywords: Things have Changed, The Real Black Shirts, I Accept the Torch
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 31 Oct 91 16:28:37 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Distribution: usa
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Lines: 23
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: scott
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Kevin Rodgers) writes:
>In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Nebraska Marty) writes:
>>Why do you feel this way? A blowout over Mizzou? A lackluster win over
>>KSU? I agree that CU has improved since Baylor and Stanford, but I don't
>>believe they are as good as last year.
>
>I think you're right, that the optimism of Colorado fans is due to the
>improvement they've made. After the Baylor and Stanford games, most of
>us were saying "They're young; next year is their year." But over the
>last 3 weeks, they've finally started playing together, like a team
>(even in the lackluster win over KSU).
>
What is this bait("lackluster win over KSU")? Well, I'm biting.
Same old story...not that KSU played good, but [opponent] played
poorly. I, for one, am actually believing that KSU can and does
play football. Both Neb and Colo did beat KSU. But Neb was 7yds
away from being possibly upset and KSU wasn't too far away from
up-ending the Buffs. CU and NU won, but not by lackluster play.
--
Scott D. Davis <[email protected]> The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!ksuvax1!deimos!mccall!scott) 615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041 Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
|
18.317 | I'll be tuned in | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Thu Oct 31 1991 13:23 | 16 |
| Marty,
I know you forwarded that info,was just askin' yo' opinion.
Sure there could be potential problems, but what the hail, let them
live. One thing for sure, they'll neverferget it.
Last year I was lucky enough to go to the Orange Bowl and my seats
were at the end of a row right opposite the CU student's section.
We had a blast with the back and forth banter. I must admit I got a
wee bit carried away at the end when they called back the Ismail
TD. As the furor died down, and the CU fans were starting to come out
of shock, I yelled over to the group I had been bantering with and
said " Now I know how Missouri felt!" I was met with cold stares.
Guess I hit a raw nerve. 8^)
MikeL
|
18.318 | I'll be there just pass me up a cheerleader | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Thu Oct 31 1991 15:48 | 4 |
| My dad's got some tickets to the game but since he works for a "wimpy" company
"HP" he probably won't go to the game and ask me if I'd like to go...
|
18.319 | Husker Updat Posted 1-Nov-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Nov 01 1991 10:02 | 44 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 31-OCT-1991 19:15:28.96
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 31st
The temperature in Lincoln today is around 20 degrees, with sleet all night
that turned to snow around noon Thursday. I hear that the Big Storm missed
Boulder, but that things there are still cold. The 'Buffs apparently had
to wait until they cleared the snow off the field to practice, though.
In case the traffic in rec.sport.football.college has escaped your attention,
the NU-CU game appears to be the most exciting contest this week. (Sorry
about that Ohio State....) The papers have been full of coverage as well.
The Colorado team has copies of NU tight end Johnny Mitchell's comments
about the game plastered up all over their dressing room: "Colorado is just
like Kansas State and Kansas to me. I don't think they can compete on our
level for a long time. We gave them life the last couple of years. But I
don't think we should have given them that much respect. They have a
great team, but I think they got some great breaks."
Nebraska's return game has been missing-in-action this season, and the Huskers
have shuffled blockers in an attempt to change that. NU ranks 33rd nationally
in punt returns and 44th in kickoff returns. Their 9.6 yard punt return
average is their lowest since 1985, and their 20.6 yard kickoff average is
7 yards less than 1990, when the Husker led the nation.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
manager of the huskers mailing list: [email protected] for details
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA19715; Thu, 31 Oct 91 18:16:39 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15361; Thu, 31 Oct 91 20:19:56 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 31 Oct 91 17:35 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 31st
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Thu, 31 Oct 91 17:35:13 CST
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.320 | Maybe 3 straight losses to CU will give him respect | BSS::JCOTANCH | Nebraska: Flirtin' with Disaster | Fri Nov 01 1991 10:26 | 27 |
|
> The Colorado team has copies of NU tight end Johnny Mitchell's comments
> about the game plastered up all over their dressing room: "Colorado is just
> like Kansas State and Kansas to me. I don't think they can compete on our
> level for a long time. We gave them life the last couple of years. But I
> don't think we should have given them that much respect. They have a
> great team, but I think they got some great breaks."
McCartney has pretty much blown off Mitchell's words, saying he's a
young kid shooting off his mouth and his opinion doesn't reflect how
the majority of the NU players feel. But you can be guaranteed, it
just gives the CU players that much more intensity.
The Nebraska defense has given up some hefty yardage this year and you
can be sure the Buffs are aware of that. If the CU O-line has a very
good game the Buffs will dominate the game. CU certainly won't put the
burden on Hagan to do it all, so expect Warren to see the ball plenty.
I also CU will have a trick play or 2 in their playbook tomorrow night.
I stand by my earlier prediction of CU by 10+.
C'mon Marty, everyone in notes knows who you're picking, why don't you
just come out and say it??? :^) :^)
Buffs Rool the Big Eight!!!!!!!!
Joe
|
18.321 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Nov 01 1991 11:17 | 6 |
| Oh no!! The game is on ESPN and we don't have cable in our area.
Is there someone in the C Spgs area that could tape the game for me ?
I have a tape at work which I can deliver.
Keith
|
18.322 | Colorado: flirtin' with Disaster | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Nov 01 1991 11:57 | 20 |
| Joe, you are so damm sure of yourself arent you. Well you better just
be right because you have set yourself up for a blasting BIG TIME !!!
And if NU wins it will come at you like a Tomahawk missle.
You are ignoring some major factors about the Huskers in this game.
I will not elaborate. I'm in a VMS class at CXN and don't have time.
And on your point about McArtney playing down the comments. That is
pure BS. McArtney may SAY that to the press, but his history is to
use anything that may come up, manipulate it and blow it up to his
players for his advantage. He does it in a slimy way and presents
himself as a pure/sinless coach of a perfect program.
Yea, he will use those comments to his fullest, blow it out of
proportion, or at least he will let it continue amoung the players.
You won't see him taking the comments down off the wall. NO way.
There, you got some garbage out of me but NO PREDICTION.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.323 | Joe: Flirin' with Disaster !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Nov 01 1991 12:18 | 34 |
| re: -1 (My own) and Joe's trying to pry my rediction...
I'll comment directly to Joe's comment about "everybody knows..."
Yes, everybody knows who I'm rooting for. Bur nobody knows who I
think will win because even I don't know who to predict.
How can you predict it? consider this:
CU hasent played squat. (OU hasent shown anyone anything this year)
Baylor and Stanford have shown to be mediocre and CU has improved
supposidly, but what does that mean? We still don't know how good
or bad they are. Just like NU last year.
NU has improved and has played a decent schedule, came from behind
and supposidly has built some character and has improved, but
STILL hasent beaten a top-10 team. Neither has CU (Sorry, OU is
NOT a top-10 team, NO WAY !!!)
NU offense is balenced and potent. CU D supposed to be very good.
CU is young and never been in a game like this. NU is semi-young
for them. (Yes, they will be better next year too.)
Who knows how the weather will affect this whole thing.
NU's O-line is almost as big as Stanfords and certainly can
at-least match them in the strength catagory.
Other factors in favor of either team. I'm out of time.
In short, there are so many unkown factors that a prediction can be
based on little but loyalties and emotion. That was my mistake last
year. I won't make it again THIS year !!!
Again Joe, you better hope your right. That's for Dang sure !!! Becuase
It'll make things doubly fun if you are wrong after your documented
comments.
Husker Henderson
|
18.324 | I've said my peace, I'm outa here... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Nov 01 1991 12:36 | 12 |
| I'm outta here. No further comments before the game.
I wish for a good, clean game with no controversy. I hope there are
no bad calls which have bearing on the game so neither side can squak
and whine.
And Finally, lets just hope that the good guys from the North with
the white hats pull out a win.
GO BIG RED !!! I Love Ya !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.325 | Should have and Would have... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sat Nov 02 1991 23:08 | 47 |
|
NEBRASKA has the "inside track" on the Orange Bowl !!!
Huskers were the stronger team in the 4th quarter. No doubt.
Nebraska should have won the game. 2, COUNT'em - TTTTWWWWOOOOOOO
blocked kicks. And one on an extra point. There is no excuse for it.
Congrats to CU special teams. Those mistakes cost Nebraska the game
and a very outside chance at the National Championship.
Well, a tie is better than a loss any day, but not by much.
Considering the following facts:
1. Huskers 1st possesion TD called back.
2. 2 stupid plays by special teams giving up a total of 6 pts.
(turnaround of 3 on the blocked extra point/safety - loss of
3 potential points on the last play of the game. By the way
the clip/clips on the safety play WERE NOT CALLED !!!)
3. Huskers offense SUCKed in the 1st half. McCant couldent his his
OPEN recievers. CU played well buy Huskers SUCKED in the 1st
half.
4. Nebraska was the stronger team in the 4th quarter.
5. Game AT Boulder.
Based on these things I say NU "SHOULD" have won. Plain and simple.
Huskers did show character again as in the KSU game. Come from behind
and almost overcame their own blockes.
McCant showed that he is a good QB in the second half.
Nebraska IS THE BETTER TEAM THIS YEAR but could only get a tie.
CU was the better team LAST year.
You will NEVER convice me that CU was better 2 years ago. NEVER !!!
Nebraska now has the inside track on the Orange Bowl. All we have to
do is take care of buiseness over 2 big-8 average teams and beat OU
at Nebraska. If this happens we are in Miami !!! A win tonight would
have enabled a loss to Oklahoma. Now we have to win. I think we can.
Great game. Nu should have won. CU will be better next year...
BUT SO WILL NEBRASKA !!!
Go Big RED !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.326 | Ohhhh, great fans you have... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sat Nov 02 1991 23:14 | 28 |
| How about those wonderfull CU Buff fans huh???
Snowballs all over the place hitting the NU players AND the REFS !!!
Oranges and snowballs hitting the field before and durring the final
field goal.
Before the second half started - Nebraska warming up on the south end
of the field. Oh yesssss, here comes Ralphie escored by 6 ASSholed
directly thru the area that NU is warming up at.
BUSH LEAGUE my friends ---- B U S H L E A G U E !!!!!!!!!!!
Don't give my any BS about how great the CU fans and their ASShold
program is!!! There is no excuse for this SH#T !!!
Last year in Lincoln - EVEN when NU took a 13 point lead THERE WERE
NO ORANGES THROWN OUT ON THE FIELD !!! McArtney said "The Nebraska
Crowd Was GREAT." That is a direct and accurate quote folks.
Well, Osborne can't say the same thing about the CU Golden Butthole
crowd. No way.
This is fact folks. Pure FACT.
CU FANS EAT "you know what"
Husker Henderson
|
18.327 | Tsk, Tsk Joe. Why dident you learn from me last year. | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sat Nov 02 1991 23:38 | 59 |
| re 18.320
Bold Joe writes:
> -< Maybe 3 straight losses to CU will give him respect >-
RESPECT for your DAMM program?? NO WAY. See -1
3 strait losses? HA, NO way. CU was lucky to get out with a tie.
> The Nebraska defense has given up some hefty yardage this year and you
> can be sure the Buffs are aware of that. If the CU O-line has a very
> good game the Buffs will dominate the game. CU certainly won't put the
> burden on Hagan to do it all, so expect Warren to see the ball plenty.
> I also CU will have a trick play or 2 in their playbook tomorrow night.
> I stand by my earlier prediction of CU by 10+.
If Nebraska's Defense sucks so bad than CU's offense sucks worse. Other
teams could get 300+ yards in the air. CU couldent. CU couldent run the
ball when it counted. Their offense sucked if NU is so bad.
CU by 10 huh. IN YOUR FACE !!! It could have easily been NU by 7. I
arive at the by adding four points taken away by penelty and the net
-3 on the fiasco blocked PAT.
Joe, NU is the better team this year. You conldent see the forest for
the tree's. Emotions caused you to make a rediculous CU +10 prediction.
> Buffs Rool the Big Eight!!!!!!!!
Like Hell they do !!!
Ummm, Ummm Good, Ummm Ummm good That what Forida sun is Umm Ummm good.
I shouldent talk so fast. We still have to beat the Okie's. Don't choke
like you did tonight Nebraska !!!
I must say now that the dust has settled. CU deserves credit. I'm
convinced that NU is the better team this year and CU still comes away
with a tie. Hats off to them. Their Folsom Field crowd sucks. Their
fans are lousy winners, but McArtney is a heck of a coach and CU played
a great game.
Well, even if NU makes the Orange bowl (and SOMETHING could still
happen to prevent that) it's gonna be tuff. We may go down there and
get beat. This tie may have guarantee'd a lesser opponent in Miami
because now the Orange bowl will have no say in the mythical national
champoinship. That is unless some wierd things happen. A non-top 5
opponent may be a good boost to the Husker program. It may be what they
need now. Well, we gotta take care of business first to get there. BUT
NU IS IN THE DRIVERS SEAT !!!
CU could still get a new years bowl possibly. Who knows. 2 losses and
a tie - hmmm with the right breaks it's still possible. If NU chokes
vs the Okie's then you go couresy of luck and Oklahoma.
Later,
Nebraska Marty
|
18.328 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sat Nov 02 1991 23:43 | 5 |
| re: last 3
Please excuse the multiple typo's in the last 3 notes. I wrote these
very fast. At home trying to get on and get off the system. I have
better things to do than this all night.
|
18.329 | Dr. Tom, Mr. Conservative, setting himself up for the choke | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 04 1991 09:49 | 38 |
|
Aw, Marty, quit your crying about the Buffs' fans (why did I know
we'd be hearing about the snowballs and oranges, which would be
considered "overzealous enthusiasm" in Lincoln). While Colorado
may just love playing in Lincoln, I've heard similar sentiments from
Oklahoma fans who've traveled there too-- as long as Nebraska wins,
that is. After Oklahoma wins in Lincoln, I've heard some pretty good
horror stories (but then again, that's still a much bigger rivalry).
Believe it or not, I was very quietly rooting for the Huskers because
a Colorado win (or tie) would effectively eliminate Oklahoma from the
Orange Bowl picture. However, I thought the ESPN announcers blew the
call on that runback of the blocked conversion attempt. Neither one
of those supposed clips looked like it to me. With the first one,
the Husker tackler had already stumbled and had no chance at the
ballcarrier when the oncoming Colorado blocker's momentum carried
himself onto the player. Definitely not a clip. The second block
was more marginal. It looked to me as if the Husker defender was hit
in the side after overrunning and turning his back to the play after
yet another nice cutback by the runner had faked him out. It was a
great piece of running for a defensive special-teams player, and there
really should be no complaining about the officiating on the play.
Marty, you should direct your energies once again at "Coach" Tom
Osborne in this one, not at trying to prove that Nebraska is the
better team after yet another big "non-win" or at taunting Colorado
fans (who came away with exactly the same sister-kissing result
you did). Osborne's strategy at the end of the game was ridiculous,
once again in classic Osborne style playing not to win and ensuring
that the prophesy comes true. Running the ball straight up the middle
with a timeout left to set up a fairly long field goal (41 yards) in
that kind of weather, after what had already happened to his kicking
game earlier? I really think Osborne was playing this one to get
out with the tie at worst, because it wouldn't affect his Orange
Bowl chances...
glenn
|
18.330 | CU or NU will end up with a good-looking sister | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 04 1991 11:02 | 67 |
| The first thing I want to say about the game is that I thought it was a
great game and both teams played very well. As disappointed as I am in the
tie, the result may be fitting in a game that had plenty of intensity, drama,
big plays, excitement, and, surprisingly, no turnovers.
What a disappointment. It's hard to even describe how a tie in a big game
like this feels. As much of a disappointment it is, it sure as hell beats a
loss. Of course, being a CU fan, I feel like CU should've won. They had
a couple of opportunities in the first half to open up the game, and they
also had the ball with a 7-point lead in the 4th quarter. On the other hand,
NU fans must feel like they should've won because they not only had the last-
second field goal try but also had the momentum the last 6 minutes or so. It
depends on what perspective you look at it from, but both teams should be
content yet disappointed with the tie.
After NU's first drive of the game, CU controlled most of the first but only
led 10-3 late in the 2nd quarter. The biggest fault came when they had NU
pinned deep and Hagan returned a punt to the 20, but CU had to settle for a
FG. I just feel that if CU could've gotten up by more than one score it
would've put that much more pressure and made it that much more tougher for
NU to come back. I have to give credit to Nebraska for playing tough defense
and coming back late in the game in a hostile environment. The most
successful thing NU did on defense was constantly pressure Hagan. I thought
CU should've gone to the fullback a little more when NU wasn't giving Hagan
any time to throw and was shutting down CU's option on the perimeter.
Nebraska started to run the ball much better in the 2nd half after averaging
less than a yard per carry in the first half. CU responded when they had to,
driving for TD's when they were down 3-0 and after NU tied it at 12, yet
couldn't put the Huskers away. And when it comes down to the end, CU needs
a blocked FG to salvage a tie.
There were numerous big plays, the biggest of which was CU blocking the extra
point attempt and returning it for a 2-pointer right before the half, which
helped CU retain momentum somewhat going into the locker room. Nebraska had
a TD called back on their first drive, but then CU had a roughing the QB to
keep that drive alive. NU got a FG on that drive. Another big play was when
NU had a 3rd and 12 in the 4th quarter and was still trailing by a TD.
McCant completed a pass to Mitchell (I believe) and he ended up gaining about
30 yards.
I'm sure the controversies will come up, especially about a possible clip or
2 on the 2-point play by CU. Yes, I agree that there could've been a clip on
the return, but the call could've gone either way. CU had a pass to James Hill
(the play he was hurt on) where he was pushed out of bounds in mid-air after
catching the ball that was ruled an incompletion. There was another pass to
Rico Smith in the 3rd quarter that I sware he caught but they never showed a
replay. It was very unfortunate for CU that their 3 starters in the offensive
backfield were out of the game at some point in the 2nd half. The loss of
Hagan was very costly on that one drive where Vance Joseph and missed a wide
open receiver and 3rd down.
Does anyone know why NU kicked off from the 50 after CU blocked the extra
point and ran it back for 2 points? Is that the rule for the 2-pointer or
was CU penalized for some sort of celebration? I never heard an explanation.
The ramifications of this tie are pretty simple. If NU wins the rest of their
games they would finished tied with CU (assuming CU wins the rest of their
games) for the Big 8 title but the Orange Bowl would take Nebraska because
they will be the higher ranked team. So Nebraska is now in control of their
destiny for New Year's day. For CU fans on Nov. 29th, it's Go Sooners!!!!
The Fiesta said they are interested in the Big 8 runner-up if they don't end
up with a FSU/Miami-ND matchup.
Joe
|
18.331 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 11:43 | 19 |
| re: -1
Joe, NU kicked from the 50 after the safety because there was indeed a flag
thrown on that runback of the blocked PAT.
All of us NU fans, including the NU radio broadcast thought they would call the
clip when we saw the flag. It was not to be. After the ref's huddled they came
up with an unsportsmanlike conduct call based on CU's celebration in the end-
zone.
Shakey at best.
Great game. Joe, I only jumped on you because you did the same thing I did
last year - got a little mouthy BEFORE the game. NO hard feelings on my part.
The crow tastes bad I know.
I still have a chance to eat crow on the OU game.
Marty
|
18.332 | Are you related to Hal, Marty? | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 04 1991 11:47 | 53 |
|
Marty, you amaze me. Here both teams end up with the dreaded tie and
you're acting like NU won. First you were satisfied with a 15-point
home loss to Washington and now you're happy with a tie against CU. I
guess NU's inability to beat highly-ranked teams over the years has
lowered your expectations severely.
Oh, and a couple of realistic reminders: Even if NU goes to the Orange
Bowl remember they're still not Big 8 Champions - they'll just share
the title with CU. And NU still hasn't beaten CU the past 3 seasons,
despite what you want to believe in your Big Red fantasyland.
> RESPECT for your DAMM program?? NO WAY. See -1
You try to call the CU fans disrespectful yet you come out with a
remark like this. You're blowing the snowball incidents way out of
proportion. They were coming from the student section and like
Waugaman said it sure would be different if it happened in Lincoln.
These type of incidents are very typical of college crowds around the
country.
> If Nebraska's Defense sucks so bad than CU's offense sucks worse. Other
> teams could get 300+ yards in the air. CU couldent. CU couldent run the
> ball when it counted. Their offense sucked if NU is so bad.
I never said NU's defense sucked so don't try putting words in my
mouth.
> Joe, NU is the better team this year.
Once again, in your mind. Sure, NU outplayed CU in the 4th quarter,
but they had to do so to salvage a TIE. That's right, a TIE. The game
was a TIE Marty. And you're saying CU was lucky to tie. That was a
good defensive play on the blocked FG, not a lucky break.
>> Buffs Rool the Big Eight!!!!!!!!
> Like Hell they do !!!
FYI, CU still hasn't lost a conference game in 3 seasons. How many
teams around the country can say that?
> If NU chokes
> vs the Okie's then you go couresy of luck and Oklahoma.
This is funny. No, make that hilarious. If OU beats NU, CU does go
courtesy of OU but not of luck. You see, the Big Eight champ is
determined by who has a better record in the conference. If NU loses
to OU then CU ends up with a better record and therefore played better
ball throughout the conference schedule and therefore deserves the
outright Big Eight title.
Joe
|
18.333 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:05 | 42 |
|
> Aw, Marty, quit your crying about the Buffs' fans (why did I know
> we'd be hearing about the snowballs and oranges, which would be
> considered "overzealous enthusiasm" in Lincoln). While Colorado
> may just love playing in Lincoln, I've heard similar sentiments from
> Oklahoma fans who've traveled there too-- as long as Nebraska wins,
> that is. After Oklahoma wins in Lincoln, I've heard some pretty good
> horror stories (but then again, that's still a much bigger rivalry).
Glenn, your rationalizing based on alleged behavior of others. 2 wrongs
do not make it ok.
> Marty, you should direct your energies once again at "Coach" Tom
> Osborne in this one, not at trying to prove that Nebraska is the
> better team after yet another big "non-win" or at taunting Colorado
> fans (who came away with exactly the same sister-kissing result
> you did).
Not exactly true. In this case their sister is uglier than ours. ;^)
IF we beat your team then WE STILL go to the Orange bowl based on the fact
that NU's record is better this year. So the Huskers get the last laugh.
Hell, we dident expect a chance at the mythical national championship anyway.
> Osborne's strategy at the end of the game was ridiculous,
> once again in classic Osborne style playing not to win and ensuring
> that the prophesy comes true. Running the ball straight up the middle
> with a timeout left to set up a fairly long field goal (41 yards) in
> that kind of weather, after what had already happened to his kicking
> game earlier? I really think Osborne was playing this one to get
> out with the tie at worst, because it wouldn't affect his Orange
> Bowl chances...
I agree that Osborne should not have just ran the ball before the kick. His
passing game was going well. McCant loosened up and started to click. I don't
agree that he was actually playing to tie. I think that's bunk. Look at his
history also. I think he really liked his chances with the field goal. His
kicker is pretty good actually. But I will concede he got to conservative.
Now Huskers, DO IT, beat our highly respected rival and send our little-
respected rival to the TOILET BOWL !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.334 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:12 | 10 |
|
No hard feelings on your part Marty? That's mighty big of
you considering you told ALL CU fans to eat "you know what"
(I'm assuming you mean $hit).
Perch and twirl dude..........
And, when you're done with that, get a life.
Claybroon
|
18.335 | Tean stats | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:15 | 30 |
| Here's the team statistics for the CU/NU game. It's about as close
as you can get. I'll have more on comments on the game later.
Keith
Neb CU
First downs 15 19
Rush 6 11
Pass 8 7
Penalty 1 1
3rd down eff 5-15 7-17
4th down eff 0-0 0-0
Total net yards 293 300
total plays 60 74
avg gain 4.9 4.1
Net yards rushing 112 160
rushes 40 51
avg. per rush 2.8 3.1
Net yards passing 181 140
Completed-att. 8-20 10-23
Sacked-yds lost 2-16 2-13
had intercepted 0 0
Punts-avg. 7-44 7-34
Return yardage 20 56
Punt ret. 2-20 3-56
Kickoff ret. 3-84 4-80
Interception ret 0-0 0-0
Penalties-yds. 4-26 5-44
Fumbles-lost 3-0 3-0
Time of possession 27:59 32:01
|
18.336 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:19 | 15 |
| To give credit where it's due, Holy Cross hasn't lost a conference game
since the middle of the 1988 season. They only do play 5 conference
games every year but there's at least one other team that can make that
claim.
Holy Cross, since that loss, is 35-0-1 in their Division 1-AA games and
since the University of Massachusetts tied them in the 1990 opener,
they've won 18 in a row for the longest winning streak in the country,
after Williams had its winning streak snapped by Trinity earlier this
year.
While I'm not much of a Holy Cross fan, it's a great achievement and
it's nice to see New England schools rack up such big winning streaks.
John
|
18.337 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:25 | 67 |
| > Marty, you amaze me. Here both teams end up with the dreaded tie and
> you're acting like NU won. First you were satisfied with a 15-point
> home loss to Washington and now you're happy with a tie against CU. I
> guess NU's inability to beat highly-ranked teams over the years has
> lowered your expectations severely.
Yes it has. My Husker expectations, and that of most Husker fans, were out
of proportion. I have admitted that previously.
> Oh, and a couple of realistic reminders: Even if NU goes to the Orange
> Bowl remember they're still not Big 8 Champions - they'll just share
> the title with CU. And NU still hasn't beaten CU the past 3 seasons,
> despite what you want to believe in your Big Red fantasyland.
Who in "Big Red Fantasyland" has said that NU beat CU in the last 3 years?
NO ONE HAS. You are the one on the defensive here.
> You try to call the CU fans disrespectful yet you come out with a
> remark like this. You're blowing the snowball incidents way out of
> proportion. They were coming from the student section and like
> Waugaman said it sure would be different if it happened in Lincoln.
> These type of incidents are very typical of college crowds around the
> country.
DEAD WRONG !!! IF, IF, IF it happened in Lincoln I would be the FIRST to
condem it. However the point is it dosent happen in Lincoln. Now I'm sure
there are some you know what holes in Lincoln that pull stunts. But nothing
like what I saw Saturday night. And no, it's not typical of what happens
all around the country. THat's bull.
> Once again, in your mind. Sure, NU outplayed CU in the 4th quarter,
> but they had to do so to salvage a TIE. That's right, a TIE. The game
> was a TIE Marty. And you're saying CU was lucky to tie. That was a
> good defensive play on the blocked FG, not a lucky break.
I'm not saying CU was fortunate to tie based on that one play. Add that together
with a TD called back and the 3 point turnaround on the PAT. How often does a
play like that happen? This may be the first time ever, and that is what gave
CU it's tie. Without that play NU wins outright. Yes, CU was VERT fortunate. This is funny. No, make that hilarious. If OU beats NU, CU does go
Even without the clip controversy thrown in Cu was very, very fortunate.
Hell, if the shoe was on the other foot you would be squacking just like me
about a clip. What if they dident call the clip on Rockets return last year?
Whoa boy, you guys would have been in an uproar. This is no different but I
have not made a huge deal over it. Geesh, even Glenn brought it up.
> courtesy of OU but not of luck. You see, the Big Eight champ is
> determined by who has a better record in the conference. If NU loses
> to OU then CU ends up with a better record and therefore played better
> ball throughout the conference schedule and therefore deserves the
> outright Big Eight title.
You state the OBVIOUIS. Remember, NU and it's fans have been involved in this
game for much longer than CU. We know this stuff and your statements here are
true. But the point is that CU is relegated to a big * IF *. They do not have
control of their destiny and that is why NU has the edge out of the tie. Yes,
it is a slim edge but it is an edge.
I know how hard it is for you CU folks to have to pull for OU. I've been in
that position many times. It's a sour taste.
I'm tellin ya, I really don't think OU is going to beat NU. There are specific
reasons for this that will be discussed as the '91 shootout approaches.
Things are semi-back to the old way again in the big-8. The Orange bowl once
again boils down to NU vs OU. Only the difference is who goes if NU looses.
|
18.338 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:26 | 7 |
| Marty, as far as going to the Orange Bowl, don't count your chickens
before they hatch. Kind of like those NU players who were whooping it
up on bench before the last-second FG attempt. And even if NU goes to
the Orange, they still only share the Big Eight title with CU.
Joe
|
18.339 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:27 | 13 |
|
As far as the game goes, I felt the two biggest factos resulting
in CU not winning were:
1) CU's punter sniffed big time. It seemed like Nebraska started
near midfield every possession in the 2cd half. CU's punter
shanked about 3 punts to give them great field position.
2) Renfro (left DT) getting hurt. Nebraska wasn't running the
ball worth a damn until he went out. The kid is a stud and
he's only a sophomore!
Claybroon
|
18.340 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:29 | 27 |
| While Marty may be mouthing off and indeed may need to get a life, I
thought also that the Colorado fans at the game had little to no class.
The ESPN announcers pointed out that no oranges were thrown on the
field at Lincoln last year, even though Colorado won. There's a
certain humility that is around teams and fans who have been winners
for a long time and I believe Nebraska has that while Colorado doesn't
seem to. I think that's what ticks the Nebraskans off the most about
Colorado. I also think that to a Nebraskan, Oklahoma is the big rival,
not Colorado.
On the field? I believe both teams conducted themselves with a lot of
class. I believe the game was well-played and very even and the breaks
tended to even out. If these teams played 3 times, I imagine there
wouldn't be more that a TD difference either way. Neither team should
be complaining and I don't think anyone has the right to say "even
though we tied, we really won the game." Bah, humbug. I have no
complaints about either team and the only thing I never really liked
about Colorado was its questionable use of the death of Sal Aunese.
Nebraska could have gotten a big monkey off its back if they'd won in
Boulder. They didn't. Now they have to face the same questioning and
doubt when Oklahoma comes to Lincoln.
The bottom line is - no matter who goes to the Orange Bowl, neither
team can claim supremacy over the other this year.
John
|
18.341 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:46 | 3 |
| re: .335
Does anyone have seperate 1st and 2nd half stats?
|
18.342 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:08 | 16 |
|
Sal again eh? Anybody in here that knew Sal? I didn't think
so. Who has the right to tell a close-knit football team how
to handle the death of a team member? What if said member
chose to inspire his mates with words to the effect of "Go, win
the big 8, and bring home the Orange Bowl"? Is this bad? Is
this just shallow, unjustified use of a person's death?
I remember the Buffs trying to keep it private. The media chose
to glorify the whole situation. Makes for good print you know.
BTW, anybody see the shameless display by Iowa this weekend?
Can you believe the way they would use the deaths of some of
their fellow students to help them win a football game?
Claybroon
|
18.343 | Be good sports and I won't say things like that Clay... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:20 | 17 |
| re: Claybroon
I have a life, a very good one, thank you.
You CU fan's are JUST as predictable in your reactions as I. You are at least
as parisan as I. In fact, you guys (in general) are guilty of over-enthusiasm
this year blocking your view of reality. Every CU fan I knew said EMPHATICALLY
that CU would win this year and they based it on play vs basically weak Big-8
teams and solid EMOTION.
Maybee when you've been around the Big-8 title hunt as long as us NU fans have
been and will be, you will have a more accurate perspective of things before
the big game.
I've learned my lesson and you guys helped me learn it. Now learn it yourselves.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.344 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:44 | 21 |
|
You seem to forget who you're talking (writing) to. I didn't
throw any snowballs or oranges. Yet, you lump all CU fans
together and tell 'em to all go "EAT you know what". I didn't
appreciate it at all.
The only thing you're guilty of is lumping us (CU fans) all
together. There's no blockage of reality here and there's
no way I'm as partisan as you. After all, you yourself said
NU football is a way of life for Nebraska fans (hence my
comments). I don't live and die for CU football. I enjoy
watching them play and will defend them from time to time
if I feel they need defending.
You make it sound as if there is a qualification process,
based on your team's success in the past, to make predictions/
analysis on games. It is to laugh. Just cuz your team has
had great success and mine only recently does not disqualify
me. Sounds like a bit of Big Red snobbery.
Claybroon
|
18.345 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:55 | 24 |
|
> Who in "Big Red Fantasyland" has said that NU beat CU in the last 3 years?
> NO ONE HAS. You are the one on the defensive here.
But it's the 2nd time in 3 years you claim NU is the better team
despite not winning the game. Marty, I remember you saying after CU's
'89 11-1 season how tough it is to stay on top and CU probably couldn't
do that. Well, look where we are 2 years later. CU swept OU and NU
last year and went 1-0-1 against them this in what was supposed to be a
rebuilding year. And in the next couple of years CU will continue to
be at or near the top of the conference. CU has legitimately arrived.
> However the point is it dosent happen in Lincoln.
What about during a basketball game in Lincoln the season right after
Sal died? ('89-'90 basketball season) CU was playing at Lincoln and
some fans held up a banner saying "Where's Sal Now?"
Now are all NU fans that classless? No. And all those snowballs were
coming from the student section and is not an indication of how CU fans
act in general.
Joe
|
18.346 | Go Big Red | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 14:23 | 40 |
| Al right, here it is.
I am on line right now:
Nebraska will beat Oklahoma by more than 9. Save this reply for future
reference. I know you will and you know who you are !!! ;^)
This is a completely different matchup than the CU/NU situation. If you will
recall my earlier note to Joe as to why I would not predict the NU/CU clash
I stated that I would not predict because the matchup was too close and there
were too many unknown factors about these teams. I was correct for once.
I feel much more safe about the NU/OU matchup this year. I feel OU has dropped
a notch or 2 from last year and NU has picked it up a few notches (Last years
NU team was just not that good IMHO).
Factors:
NU has shown character this year. Ability to come from behaind and
they have shown good focus. Now with their goal in sight I feel that
the focus will become even stronger.
NU's offense is well balanced. This was demonstrated in the CU game
after McCant settled down (He publicly stated to the press that he
was "nervous" n the 1st half of the CU game - I think the bomb to
Bostick at the end of the half helped him a lot). He is a good passer
and with Bostick and Mitchell he has good recievers. I need not say anything about the Husker ground game.
The NU defense getting better.
OU just isent the same this year. I know they have the potential to
beat Nebraska but I just can't see it this year.
Nebraska wants that Orange Bowl badly. The NU players firmly believe
to a man that they are the best team the Big-8 has to send and they
want to prove it.
Well there I go with the KOD.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.347 | Don't get too cocky yet, Marty, you've been here before | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 04 1991 14:51 | 29 |
|
Speaking as a fan whose team "deserves" respect for being in the
Big-8 hunt nearly every year, can a certain someone tell me what
Tom Osborne's record is in games he's needed to win against Oklahoma
in order to go to the Orange Bowl? By my count, it's 2-11, but a
couple of those games in the 1970s may not have been for the Orange
Bowl; I'm not sure. In any case, Osborne has only won twice under
such circumstances, in 1978-- perhaps Nebraska's last upset of *any*
team and a game that only earned them a revenge defeat at the hands
of those same Sooners, and in 1988, when they sloshed out a 7-3 win
in the rain against Barry Switzer's final, mediocre Sooner team. Not
too impressive, folks, and hardly confidence-building...
Still, it'd be nice if Colorado would lend some incentive to the
Sooners by dumping the Kansas game in two weeks. If Oklahoma's
not playing for the Orange and Nebraska is, I don't feel excessively
confident about the Sooners' resolve either, especially under Gary
Gibbs.
What's the big deal about throwing oranges on the field? Used to
be a Big-8 tradition and a source of pride, not of scorn. I didn't
notice at what points in the game the Colorado fans were doing it,
but the Oklahoma fans definitely used to after touchdowns in the big
Nebraska games, and no one thought anything of it. Snowballs are
another matter entirely, of course, but it's not to often there's
snow on the ground in November in Norman. ;-)
glenn
|
18.348 | My thoughts on the Big game | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 04 1991 16:32 | 34 |
| No matter what anybody said, this was definately the biggest game of the
year for both CU and NU. After the game, Johnny Mitchell and some of the
NU fans were talking like they won the game even though it was a tie.
Whether they realize it or not, such enthusiasm over a tie shows respect
for the other team. I'll speak for myself and say that I have a lot of
respect for the Nebraska Cornhuskers, their coaches and fans. I hope they
will admit the same. Rivalries in any sport are good. Animosity is not.
The most amazing fact of the game was that there was no turnovers by either
side. I'll give a lot of credit to both teams and their coaching staffs for
a job well done. This game was college football at it's best. Hard hits,
great plays, come from behind scores, marching bands, cheer leaders, crazy
fans, defenses that would bend but not break, incredibly cold weather and not
an empty seat in the stadium on the last play.
I was disappointed that CU didn't win the game. They had their chances to
break it open. At least on the last play of the game, they were the ones who
made the best effort. With the injuries to Hagan, Warren, Hill, Henry and
Renfro I can't help but think that they may have won if they were healthy
for the whole game. But then again, nobody really knows what would have
happened if they were all healthy for the whole game.
The rest of CU's schedule includes Okla. St., Kansas and Iowa State. Kansas
could give CU a tough time but I expect a win each game. All in all, I've
been happy with the Buffs this year. Everybody expected them to finish 3rd
in the Big 8. Now, it looks like they'll either be co-champs or win it
outright. With their freshman and sophmore talent, they will surely be a
major power in the coming years and no longer the doormat of the Big 8.
Go Sooners!!! Beat the Huskers!! (I never thought anybody would ever hear
me say that)
Keith
|
18.349 | I'm tellin ya, It aint just Nebraska people... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 04 1991 17:56 | 9 |
| Hey guys, relax. I just send CU to the Orange Bowl by predicting an NU win
over those Okie's. ;^)
By the way, in the USENET (a nationwide network) folks are all over the Buff
fans for their behavior on national TV Saturday night. You see, it's not just
me or NU fans. You CU folks are shelted here in this state. You don't get the
nationwide perspective.
Husker Henderson
|
18.350 | Hypathetical ???? | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Nov 06 1991 14:15 | 16 |
| Do you think there is any chance of the Orange Bowl pulling a '78 and inviting
CU as NU's opponent in Miami on Jan. 1?
For those of you who are unaware of what I'm refering to, in 1978 Nebraska
upset #1 Oklahoma then lost to Mizzou. This set up a tie for the big-8 with
NU and OU both 6-1. Since NU beat OU the Huskers got the automatic bowl bid.
The Orange Bowl shocked everyone by giving the other bid to Oklahoma. OU, being
the better team that year beat NU by 7 in the Orange bowl.
I personally don't think it'll happen but I'd like to see it. Then it could
be settled once for all (This year, and for the rematch I would flat out
predice a Husker victory).
Would you guys/gals like to see this happen? Do you think it will/could?
Nebraska Marty
|
18.351 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Nov 06 1991 14:35 | 12 |
| I would like to see it. If they end up tied for the title after tying
each other, it would be a fair way to settle it and I think it would be
the most attractive matchup the Orange Bowl could make. Major
independents such as Miami, Florida State and Notre Dame are likely to
head for greener pastures, Washington is most likely to go to the Rose
Bowl. Both teams bring a lot of fans with them, so it's attractive
from that viewpoint.
I think it's the best matchup the Orange Bowl could make. I say they
should do it.
John
|
18.352 | Rather see something else... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 06 1991 14:36 | 26 |
|
> I personally don't think it'll happen but I'd like to see it. Then it could
> be settled once for all (This year, and for the rematch I would flat out
> predice a Husker victory).
> Would you guys/gals like to see this happen? Do you think it will/could?
Speaking as a fan of college football and of the Big-8 (but not of
either team), a rematch wouldn't hold a lot of appeal for me. I'd
rather see both teams go out into the world, so to speak, and find
out how the Big-8 stacks up in matchups against other conferences.
That's a big part of the attraction of the bowl season.
It really isn't the same situation as 1978 (and even then Nebraska
wasn't happy about it, and I can't say as I blame them). Neither
of the two teams this year can hold a candle to 1978 OU or NU, in
my opinion. There's really not a whole lot riding on proof of who's
really the best this year. In 1978, Oklahoma had only the one loss,
which they were able to avenge, and had a marginal claim on the
national championship with Alabama and USC (damn you Huskers! The
Billy Sims fumble inside the five after a great run was the most
frustrating moment *ever* for me as a Sooner fan!). Settle the NU-CU
standoff next year. It's worth waiting for...
glenn
|
18.353 | Big Eight Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | GO BIG ORANGE | Wed Nov 06 1991 16:21 | 19 |
| Conf. All
Nebraska 3-0-1 6-1-1
Colorado 3-0-1 5-2-1
Oklahoma 3-1 6-2
Kansas 2-2 5-3
Iowa St. 1-2-1 3-4-1
Kansas St. 1-3 4-4
Missouri 1-3 3-4-1
Oklahoma St. 0-3-1 0-7-1
This week's games & spreads:
Colorado (-28) at Oklahoma State
Nebraska (-14.5) at Kansas
Oklahoma (-18) at Missouri
Kansas State (-4) at Iowa State
Joe
|
18.354 | Chances of Orange rematch are slim and none | BSS::JCOTANCH | GO BIG ORANGE | Wed Nov 06 1991 16:37 | 14 |
| I would like to see the rematch, but as I mentioned in another note
I don't think the Orange Bowl would want any part of it. Do you think
the rest of the country would be care about it as much as they did
about the first game? The opponent for the Big 8 in the Orange will
probably be Miami, FSU, or Notre Dame.
I remember the '78 rematch pretty well and Glenn's right that NU
wasn't happy about it and rightfully so. They had already had their
annual grudge match with OU and come out on top. But this year a
rematch would make sense with the tie.
Joe
|
18.355 | Husker Notes 5-Nov-1991 (Nebraska CU Stats) | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Nov 07 1991 17:46 | 102 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 5-NOV-1991 12:52:06.32
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: NU 19, Colorado 19
(Sorry about the delay, but I had a 9AM flight on Sunday to Pittsburgh, where
my son was checking out Carnegie Mellon.)
Nebraska came within an elbow of beating Colorado, as CU's Greg Thomas blocked
a 41 yard field goal attempt on the last play of the game which would have
won the game. Instead, the game wound up a 19-19 tie, leaving the Big Eight
conference title unresolved until Nebraska plays Oklahoma the day after
Thanksgiving, and the Orange Bowl in a bind, because bowl bids will be locked
up well before then.
In a game in which both teams played well at times and poorly at other times,
the dominating force may well have been the zero degree temperature. Kicking
games played a major role: Nebraska had the winning field goal blocked, and
a blocked extra point at the end of the first half was returned 85 yards
for a two-point Colorado score, in effect a three-point swing. Instead of
a 10-10 halftime score, Colorado went in to their (warm) dressing room with
a 12-9 lead. Nebraska's punt game was 10 yards better than Colorado's, on
average, as the CU punter shanked a couple of them.
CU nose tackle Jeff Brunner said, "Maybe a game like this should end up a
tie." NU kicker Byron Bennett would like a rematch, as would many other NU
players, although the Orange Bowl is unlikely to oblige, even though they did
rematch NU and OU in 1979. (At the time, a VERY unpopular move in Lincoln.)
NU I-back Derek Brown, held to 96 yards for his first sub-100 yard game this
season, had most of NU's 112 rushing yards, and would have had 100 had he
not been stopped for negative yards several times early in the game;
NU was in negative rushing yards for much of the first half.
Scoring and Stats:
Nebraska 3 6 3 7 - 19
Colorado 7 5 7 0 - 19
NU - Bennett 27 yd FG
CU - Hagan 11 yd run (Harper kick)
CU - Harper 27 yd FG
NU - Bostick 49 yd pass from McCant (kick blocked)
CU - Biekert 85 yard blocked PAT return
NU - Bennett 35 yard FG
CU - Hagan 4 yard run (Harper kick)
NU - D. Brown 7 yard run (Bennett kick)
Attendance: 52,319
NU CU
First downs 15 19
Rushes-yards 40-112 51-160
Passing yards 181 140
Total yards 293 300
Return yards 20 56
Passing 8-20-0 10-23-0
Punts 7-43.6 7-33.6
Fumbles-lost 3-0 3-0
Penalties-yards 4-26 5-44
Time of possession 27:59 32:01
Third-down conversions 5-15 7-15
Individual stats:
Rushing
CU: Warren 17-55, Hagan 19-40, Hill 8-40, Kahl 3-12, Bussey 1-7,
V. Joseph 1-4, Phillips 1-1, Westbrook 1-1
NU: D. Brown 30-96, McCant 8-11, Lewis 1-6, Hughes 1- -1
Passing
CU: Hagan 10-22-0-140, V. Joseph 0-1-0-0
NU: McCant 8-20-0-181
Receiving:
CU: S. Brown 4-60, Warren 2-35, Westbrook 2-17, R. Smith 1-17,
C. Johnson 1-11
NU: Mitchell 2-70, Bostick 2-59, Turner 2-32, Garrett 1-12, D. Brown 1-8
Punting:
CU: Berger 7-235 (33.6)
NU: Stigge 7-305 (43.6)
Punt returns:
CU: Hagan 3-56
NU: Turner 1-11, Hughes 1-9
Kickoff returns:
CU: Hueson 2-38, C. Johnson 1-28, Mitchell 1-14
NU: Highes 2-62, D. Brown 1-22
Note--If CU and NU end up with identical conference records, the Orange Bowl
selects the Big Eight representative, probably based on overall record or
position in the polls.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA16258; Tue, 5 Nov 91 11:53:11 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03993; Tue, 5 Nov 91 13:56:28 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 5 Nov 91 13:45 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 5 Nov 91 13:45 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: NU 19, Colorado 19
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.356 | Husker Notes 07-Nov-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Nov 07 1991 17:53 | 65 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 7-NOV-1991 15:11:49.81
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Nov 7th
Administrivia--the list is about to go international! We've received a
request from a Creighton alum (but NU fan) in Israel.
I either lost or misplaced the paper with the depth chart info on it,
so you might not get that information this week. Sorry.
The NU-CU game controversy hasn't stopped yet. TE Johnny Mitchell, whose
remarks were widely distributed in Boulder last week, is still talking
and the newspapers are still printing it. Ah, well.
Today's World-Herald is full of letters complaining about the Colorado
fans. As I said on USENET, it wasn't all that long ago that oranges on the
turf were common at NU games. (In fact, they used to have them at the
student cafeterias on campus on game days--dumb idea!) It took one striking
an NU security officer (and nearly crippling him) to get the practice
quelled at NU, I only hope Coloradans wise up faster than that. A snowball
thrown from 30 or 40 rows up could almost be classified as a deadly weapon.
There was an all-Nebraska trade in the Continental Basketball Association
yesterday. The Tri-City (Wash) Chinook traded forward Tony Farmer to
Sioux Falls for guard Clifford Scales.
They ought to recruit Glen Mason for the Huskers Booster Club, except that
his employer, the University of Kansas, might object. Mason, the KU football
coach, has great respect for Tom Osborne's record at Nebraska. "To win the
way he has for the number of years he's been at Nebraska--or anyplace-- is
unbelievable.... If it sounds as if I'm jealous, I am. And so are a lot
of other people."
You might think that with NU playing in Lawrence KS this week that Memorial
Stadium in Lincoln would be empty, but it won't be. The bad weather has
caused several Omaha-area high school playoff games to be moved to Lincoln.
Oklahoma doesn't have the monopoly on sexual harassment charges in the Big
Eight anymore. As many as seven members of the UNL Women's swimming team
have claimed that coach Ray Huppert was hugging them or patting them after
they did something well. NU Athletic Director Bob Devaney says 'He was a
little more friendly than he should be', but that the issue has been dealt
with at the university level and is now a closed matter. Huppert's attorney
is upset that the matter was made public, and says "any allegations of
touching in inappropriate places is patently false". Although it has been
announced that any member of the team may leave without jeopardizing her
scholarship, so far there have been no changes. (BTW, OU apparently edited a
two-second clip of Anita Hill out of the promo that they run during televised
football games.)
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA03248; Thu, 7 Nov 91 14:12:51 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07302; Thu, 7 Nov 91 16:16:44 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 7 Nov 91 13:55 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 7 Nov 91 13:55 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Nov 7th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.357 | Husker Notes NU vs KU | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Sun Nov 10 1991 19:36 | 136 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 10-NOV-1991 13:14:15.64
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Kansas 23, Nebraska 59
Kansas 23, Nebraska 59
It's hard to decide who was more amazed, sports fans around the country
when they heard the first quarter score: Kansas 17--Nebraska 0, or NU
redshirt freshman Calvin Jones when he read this morning's paper and saw
that he really DID have 294 yards and 6 TD's against Kansas yesterday.
(Both were Nebraska records, 6 TD's is also a Big Eight record.) Calvin,
NU's 3rd string I-back at the start of the season, came into the game when
Derek Brown removed himself because he had blurry vision after being poked
in the eye. Brown had 75 yards on 13 carries before coming out.
NU Coach Tom Osborne, not known to have much interest in records, told
Calvin that he was only a yard or so away from the record, "so when you
go in there, you get it." Calvin responded with a six yard burst up the
middle.
The game started off poorly for NU, with a blocked punt giving Kansas the ball
on the Nebraska 14 yard line. An early goal line stand by the Blackshirts
held, and Kansas settled for a 19 yard Eichloff field goal. The Huskers
next two possessions were non-productive, and Kansas took advantage of good
field position by going 71 yards in 3 plays, and then 57 yards in 4 plays
to go up 17-0.
In the second quarter, NU got the wind at its back, and got the offense in
gear, with an 80 yard 15 play drive for their first score, a 47 yard Bennett
field goal following an interception, and NU tied the game at 17-17 on Calvin
Jone's 47 yard run, up to that point his longest run from scrimmage in a
Nebraska uniform. KU wasn't ready for halftime yet, and regained the lead
with a 21 yard field goal capping off a 76 yard 14 play drive, the first
points scored in the game against the wind, with just 23 seconds left in the
half. On the ensuing short kickoff, Hawkins nearly broke free, but the half
ended with a missed field goal attempt by Bennett.
Whatever Charlie McBride told his defensive troops at halftime must have
worked, because they gave up only 102 yards to Kansas in the second half,
only 26 yards in the 4th quarter, and just three points. Meanwhile,
NU scored on all six of its possessions in the second half, four of them
by the Calvin Jones Express, with TD runs of 9, 1, 68, and 12 yards. Jones's
294 yards surpassed Mike Rozier's 285 yard performance against Kansas in 1983.
Kansas fans must have been experiencing deja vu, perhaps remembering NU reserve
running back Craig Johnson, who gained most of his NU yards against Kansas, and
still holds the NU single-game average yardage record for his 1978 performance
of 192 yards in 10 attempts.
NU assistant head coach Frank Solich, who works with running backs, said that
despite Jones's record, he might not make first string if Derek Brown is
healthy. "I don't want people to forget what Derek has done, week after week,
in tough situations, for entire games. We'll work the playing time problem
out as we go along."
Scoring and statistics:
Nebraska 0 17 14 28 - 59
Kansas 17 3 3 0 - 23
KU: Eichloff 19 yard FG
KU: Changler 50 yard pass from Hilleary (Eichloff kick)
KU: Hilleary 34 yard run (Eichloff kick)
NU: Jones 3 yard run (Eichloff kick)
NU: Bennett 47 yard FG
NU: Jones 47 yard run (Bennett kick)
KU: Eichloff 21 yard FG
NU: Jones 9 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Jones 1 yard run (Bennett kick)
KU: Eichloff 52 yard FG
NU: Jones 68 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Jones 12 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Achola 31 yard run (Sieler kick)
NU: Achola 15 yard run (Sieler kick)
Attendance estimate: 40,000
NU KU
First downs 32 15
Rushes-yards 60-490 35-145
Passing yards 103 210
Total yards 593 255
Return yards 16 32
Passing 12-20-0 11-26-2
Punts 3-26 5-38
Fumbles-lost 1-0 0-0
Penalties-yards 1-5 4-35
Time of possession 33:47 26:13
Third-down conversions 9-12 3-13
Fourth-down conversions 0-0 1-1
Individual stats:
Rushing:
NU: C. Jones 27-294, D. Brown 13-75, Achola 6-61, McCant 8-43, Lewis 3-4,
Johnk 1-9, Joseph 1-4, Glantz 1-0
KU: Sands 11-56, Cozzens 10-49, Hilleary, 7-24, Robben 2-7, White 4-2,
Thomas 1-2
Passing:
NU: McCant 9-17-0, 71 yards, Joseph 3-3-0, 32 yards
KU: Hilleary 11-25-1, 210 yards, Thomas 0-1-0, 0 yards
Receiving:
NU: Turner 4-35, Bostick 2-18, Mitchell 2-12, Leise 1-016, D. Brown 1-9,
Dixon 1-9, C. Jones 1-4
KU: Drayton 6-86, New 2-41, Chandler 1-50, White 1-23, Gay 1-10
Punting:
NU: Stigge 2-53 (26.5 ave, 1 blocked), KU: Eichloff 5-190 (38 ave)
Kickoff returns:
NU: Hawkins 2-38
KU: Bowen 3-67, White 3-24
Interception returns:
NU: Wilhite 2-16
NU Injury reports: Derek Brown may have a bruised cornea, Kenny Wilhite may
have a torn ligament in his knee.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
manager of the huskers mailing list: [email protected] for details
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA03194; Sun, 10 Nov 91 12:15:29 -0800
% Received: from tssi.UUCP by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05516; Sun, 10 Nov 91 14:13:49 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Sun, 10 Nov 91 13:35 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Subject: Kansas 23, Nebraska 59
% To: [email protected]
% Date: Sun, 10 Nov 91 13:26:48 CST
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.358 | Another cardiac finish | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 11 1991 12:28 | 38 |
| CU beats OSU, 16-12, with a very exciting last minute in the game and
a fake field goal which nobody, including the CU fans, expected.
Obviously, CU came out flat after all the injuries and their sister
kissing game with Nebraska. I think Hagan had the worst day of his
career at CU. He threw 3 first half interceptions which equaled
his season total up to the OSU game. But in all fairness, OSU was putting
a lot of pressure on him each time he went back to pass. There was one
OSU lineman(can't remember his name) who repeatedly beat the CU blocker and
was chasing Hagan all day. CU's offensive line is still the team's biggest
weakness by far. In the 1st half, CU had a total of 5 turnovers but the
defense played good and limited OSU to 3 points.
In the 2nd half, OSU never could move the ball well against CU but they did
block a punt and score a short TD soon after. Ted johson intercepted an
OSU pass in the 3rd quarter but fumbled it back to OSU on the run back.
If he had held onto the ball, I'm sure CU would have put the game away at
that time. CU's offense never did get on track but there were 2 incredible
QB scrambles(the 1st by Hagan, the 2nd by Vance Joseph when Hagan got
injured) which kept them alive. With 14 seconds left and no CU timeouts
left, CU lined up for a 37 yard field goal attempt. OSU called a timeout
to ice the kicker. During the timeout, Coach Mac decided to try a fake
filed gaol and go for a TD. OSU called a 2nd timeout. They finally lined
up and snapped the ball. On TV, it looked like OSU got good penetration and
blocked the kick but the holder, Robby James, picked up the ball just
before the kicker's leg came through. He ran to the right and then passed
to a wide open Christian Furia who ran for 20 yards and the game winning
TD. I don't think anybody in the stadium or anybody who watched on TV
expected a fake kick. It was one of Mac's greatest calls.
Lamont Warren injured his shoulder again. The last I heard, he will miss
the rest of the season but should be ready for a bowl game. In the off
season, he'll have surgery. Chad Brown came out of the game twice because
of injuries but was able to finish the game. Has anybody heard any more news
about CU's injuries ? What about Hagan ? Will he be able to play next
week ?
Keith
|
18.359 | Whew! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 11 1991 13:05 | 58 |
| I never thought CU could lose to OSU even with a flat performance, but
when it came down to the end CU was only a missed FG/fake away from a
huge upset. You can blame the 6 turnovers by CU, but OSU had 4
themselves. The Buffs dropped 2 spots in the polls, and deservedly so.
I was having some work done on my car and was listening to the radio as
my wife was driving me there to pick it up. There was only a few
minutes left and CU was trailing 12-10. (I wasn't really listening too
close 'cuz I was still beaming from Tennessee's big comeback). Anyway,
I came out of the shop and got in may car only to hear the announcer
saying 'They're probably already celebrating in Lincoln'. I said s#!t,
they're actually going to lose to OSU. Well, it was still CU's ball
but 4th and 14 and to top it off Joseph was in at QB. CU managed to
convert this one, but I didn't fully appreciate that 4th and 14 play
until I saw the replay that night. What an incredible scramble by
Joseph. The fake was a good call if you consider CU's kicking history
this season. Before the kick I didn't think he would make it.
Interesting thing you mentioned about the timeouts before the fake,
Keith. CU didn't plan on faking before the timeouts, but Mac and a
graduate assistant got talking about it during the first timeout. It
was only 3rd down, so the grad asst. said to McCartney at least it's
3rd down so if it's a bad snap, we'll have another shot. Mac said that
wouldn't be the case because they were out of timeouts and the clock
would run out. But it got him to thinking about a fake where an
incomplete pass would stop the clock and they could still try the FG on
4th down. Maybe after hearing that one teams will think twice about
calling timeouts to freeze a kicker before he tries a last-second kick!
NU fans, this was actually better for you guys anyway. You see, if CU
had lost, that would've brought OU back into contention for the league
title and the Sooners could've won it outright by beating the Huskers
on the day after Thanksgiving. Therefore, OU would've been coming to
Lincoln with much more incentive. But nevertheless, OU will still be
ready play against NU.
RE: Hagan's injury
I haven't heard anything since yesterday, but the ankle was said to be
sore after the game so I would guess it's minor and he'll be back this
week against the Jayhawks.
Speaking of KU, they got me a bit excited there with that 17-0 lead in
the 1st quarter but it sure didn't last. KU led 20-17 at halftime but
it must've been all NU in the 2nd half. Kansas, how in the hell do you
blow a 17-point lead at home???? Well, I don't know, but....
I guess you could ask Notre Dame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:^) :^) :^) :^) :^) :^)
Absolutely could not resist that one!
Joe
|
18.360 | Wherever ya are, I feel for ya, Cowboy... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 11 1991 13:13 | 13 |
|
You got that right, Joe! Husker fans, if anything, should have been
rooting *for* Colorado, to make their team look all the better. But
we Sooner fans were pretty damn torn up about it when we saw that
fake field goal replay (ESPN was monitoring the game live, as it
happened, during their halftime show).
Still, would it be asking too much of Kansas to take Colorado to
the wire just one more time? Kansas is vastly superior to Oklahoma
State...
glenn
|
18.361 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 11 1991 14:04 | 20 |
| Chairman of the Fiesta committee Don Meyers said his bowl is trying to
arrange a deal with the Big 8 where OU or CU will end up in Tempe on
New Year's day. Bowls can't deal with individual schools before Sunday
but can deal through conference offices. The arrangement may be
completed tomorrow Wednesday and would work like this: If NU goes to
the Orange CU would go to the Fiesta and OU to the Aloha. If CU goes
to the Orange NU would go to the Gator and OU to the Fiesta.
RE: KU-CU
I think CU will come out on fire and win easily after the poor showing
against OSU. After the terrible game against Stanford the Buffs came
back strong the next 2 weeks.
If there's one thing that bothers me about this CU team it's their
ability to play down to teams like Stanford and OSU, although Stanford
is turning into a likely bowl team. I hope it's just due to their
youth and they get it out of their system before next season.
Joe
|
18.362 | CU injury update | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 12 1991 10:45 | 10 |
| Lamont Warren will need surgery for his dislocated shoulder after the
season but will probably play against Kansas on Saturday. He will play
with a special harness.
Hagan is probable for Saturday.
Mark Henry is about 80 percent.
Joe
|
18.363 | Big Eight Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 12 1991 10:52 | 19 |
| Conf. All
Nebraska 4-0-1 7-1-1
Colorado 4-0-1 6-2-1
Oklahoma 4-1 7-2
Kansas St. 2-3 5-4
Kansas 2-3 5-4
Iowa St. 1-3-1 3-5-1
Missouri 1-4 3-5-1
Oklahoma St. 0-4-1 0-8-1
This week's games & spreads:
Kansas (+19.5) at Colorado
Missouri (+9) at Kansas State
Iowa State (+38) at Nebraska
Oklahoma State (+30) at Oklahoma
Joe
|
18.364 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:55 | 27 |
| CU's nonleague schedules for the next 4 years:
1992
COLORADO STATE
at Baylor
at Minnesota
IOWA
1993
TEXAS
BAYLOR
at Stanford
MIAMI (FL)
1994
Colorado State (site TBA)
at Texas
WISCONSIN
at Michigan
1995
COLORADO STATE
at Wisconsin
SAN JOSE STATE
TEXAS A&M
|
18.365 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Nov 13 1991 15:05 | 3 |
| It will be nice to see CU play teams like Miami, Michigan and Iowa.
Tim
|
18.366 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Nov 13 1991 15:53 | 8 |
| Yes, I agree, it will be nice to see CU play some of the traditional
powers. 1993 will be especially tough with Texas, Baylor, Standford and
Miami. By that time, Warren, Westbrook, Hudson and Stewart will be Juniors
and Renfro, Hill and Joseph will be seniors. The team should be peaking
around that time. They'll need to be experienced and peaking since the
pre-season schedule doesn't have any easy teams.
Keith
|
18.367 | Game reviews week of 9-Nov-1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Nov 14 1991 11:10 | 281 |
| Article 8272
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!sparky!dsndata!tssi!nolan
From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Eight Review (Nov 9)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 13 Nov 91 17:16:38 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: Tailored Software Services, Inc.
Lines: 270
Scott is in the Big Apple this week, so I'm pinch-hitting. (Yeah, I know,
that's the wrong analogy for a football newsgroup.)
Results:
Nebraska 59, Kansas 23
Colorado 16, Oklahoma State 12
Kansas State 37, Iowa State 7
Oklahoma 56, Missouri 16
Kansas 23, Nebraska 59
It's hard to decide who was more amazed, sports fans around the country
when they heard the first quarter score: Kansas 17--Nebraska 0, or NU
redshirt freshman Calvin Jones when he read this morning's paper and saw
that he really DID have 294 yards and 6 TD's against Kansas yesterday.
(Both were Nebraska records, 6 TD's is also a Big Eight record.) Calvin,
NU's 3rd string I-back at the start of the season, came into the game when
Derek Brown removed himself because he had blurry vision after being poked
in the eye. Brown had 75 yards on 13 carries before coming out.
NU Coach Tom Osborne, not known to have much interest in records, told
Calvin that he was only a yard or so away from the record, "so when you
go in there, you get it." Calvin responded with a six yard burst up the
middle.
The game started off poorly for NU, with a blocked punt giving Kansas the ball
on the Nebraska 14 yard line. An early goal line stand by the Blackshirts
held, and Kansas settled for a 19 yard Eichloff field goal. The Huskers
next two possessions were non-productive, and Kansas took advantage of good
field position by going 71 yards in 3 plays, and then 57 yards in 4 plays
to go up 17-0.
In the second quarter, NU got the wind at its back, and got the offense in
gear, with an 80 yard 15 play drive for their first score, a 47 yard Bennett
field goal following an interception, and NU tied the game at 17-17 on Calvin
Jone's 47 yard run, up to that point his longest run from scrimmage in a
Nebraska uniform. KU wasn't ready for halftime yet, and regained the lead
with a 21 yard field goal capping off a 76 yard 14 play drive, the first
points scored in the game against the wind, with just 23 seconds left in the
half. On the ensuing short kickoff, Hawkins nearly broke free, but the half
ended with a missed field goal attempt by Bennett.
Whatever Charlie McBride told his defensive troops at halftime must have
worked, because they gave up only 102 yards to Kansas in the second half,
only 26 yards in the 4th quarter, and just three points. Meanwhile,
NU scored on all six of its possessions in the second half, four of them
by the Calvin Jones Express, with TD runs of 9, 1, 68, and 12 yards. Jones's
294 yards surpassed Mike Rozier's 285 yard performance against Kansas in 1983.
Kansas fans must have been experiencing deja vu, perhaps remembering NU reserve
running back Craig Johnson, who gained most of his NU yards against Kansas, and
still holds the NU single-game average yardage record for his 1978 performance
of 192 yards in 10 attempts.
NU assistant head coach Frank Solich, who works with running backs, said that
despite Jones's record, he might not make first string if Derek Brown is
healthy. "I don't want people to forget what Derek has done, week after week,
in tough situations, for entire games. We'll work the playing time problem
out as we go along."
Scoring and statistics:
Nebraska 0 17 14 28 - 59
Kansas 17 3 3 0 - 23
KU: Eichloff 19 yard FG
KU: Changler 50 yard pass from Hilleary (Eichloff kick)
KU: Hilleary 34 yard run (Eichloff kick)
NU: Jones 3 yard run (Eichloff kick)
NU: Bennett 47 yard FG
NU: Jones 47 yard run (Bennett kick)
KU: Eichloff 21 yard FG
NU: Jones 9 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Jones 1 yard run (Bennett kick)
KU: Eichloff 52 yard FG
NU: Jones 68 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Jones 12 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU: Achola 31 yard run (Sieler kick)
NU: Achola 15 yard run (Sieler kick)
Attendance estimate: 40,000
NU KU
First downs 32 15
Rushes-yards 60-490 35-145
Passing yards 103 210
Total yards 593 255
Return yards 16 32
Passing 12-20-0 11-26-2
Punts 3-26 5-38
Fumbles-lost 1-0 0-0
Penalties-yards 1-5 4-35
Time of possession 33:47 26:13
Third-down conversions 9-12 3-13
Fourth-down conversions 0-0 1-1
Individual stats:
Rushing:
NU: C. Jones 27-294, D. Brown 13-75, Achola 6-61, McCant 8-43, Lewis 3-4,
Johnk 1-9, Joseph 1-4, Glantz 1-0
KU: Sands 11-56, Cozzens 10-49, Hilleary, 7-24, Robben 2-7, White 4-2,
Thomas 1-2
Passing:
NU: McCant 9-17-0, 71 yards, Joseph 3-3-0, 32 yards
KU: Hilleary 11-25-1, 210 yards, Thomas 0-1-0, 0 yards
Receiving:
NU: Turner 4-35, Bostick 2-18, Mitchell 2-12, Leise 1-016, D. Brown 1-9,
Dixon 1-9, C. Jones 1-4
KU: Drayton 6-86, New 2-41, Chandler 1-50, White 1-23, Gay 1-10
Punting:
NU: Stigge 2-53 (26.5 ave, 1 blocked), KU: Eichloff 5-190 (38 ave)
Kickoff returns:
NU: Hawkins 2-38
KU: Bowen 3-67, White 3-24
Interception returns:
NU: Wilhite 2-16
Colorado vs. Oklahoma State
Saturday Nov.9 1991 Lewis Field Stillwater Oklahoma
Colorado 0 3 7 6 16
Oklahoma State 0 3 0 9 12
OSU -- Myers 28yd FG
CU -- Harper 24yd FG
CU -- Smith 10yd pass from Hagan (Harper kick)
OSU -- Kirksey 7yd pass from Ford (Myers kick)
OSU -- Safety (blocked put out of end zone)
CU -- Fauria 20yd pass from James (kick failed)
Attendance -- 25,000
CU OSU
First Downs 20 13
Rushes - yds 52-189 44-114
Passing yds 156 118
Return yds 63 14
Passes 11-25-3 11-24-3
Punts 7-31 9-41
Fumbles - lost 5-3 1-1
Penalties - yds 5-46 2-21
Time of Possession 31:58 28:02
Individual Statistics
Rushing: CU Hill 10-57 Warren 13-48 Kahl 10-46
Phillips 2-15 Hagan 15-15 Joseph 1-10
Westbrook 1-(-2)
OSU Denson 18-41 Berrien 9-30 Ford 11-25
Franks 6-18
Passing: CU Hagan 9-19-3-119 Joseph 1-5-0-17
James 1-1-0-20
OSU Ford 11-24-3-118
Receiving: CU Brown 2-31 Westbrook 2-29 Warren 2-24
Fauria 1-20 Johnson 1-19 Hill 1-17
Smith 1-10 Embree 1-6
OSU Kirksey 3-42 Cheatwood 3-40 Milliner 2-19
Thompson 2-13 Markham 1-4
A turnover-filled game at Stillwater saw CU keep their Big 8 title
and Orange Bowl hopes alive with a sloppy -- and fortunate -- win
over the Oklahoma State Cowboys.
The Buffs came into the game against the winless Cowboys a little
banged up after last week's game against Nebraska, as DT Leonard
Renfro didn't make the trip, TB Lamont Warren still had a dislocated
shoulder, and other players with various minor injuries. By the end
of the game Warren had left, injuring his shoulder again, and Hagan
had a minor ankle injury.
CU was very flat and emotionless, and plagued by turnovers throughout
the first half. While the Buffs defense was tough as usual, stopping
OSU at every turn, CU's offense was handing the ball back with a fumble
and three interceptions, one of which led to OSU's three first-half
points. CU managed to tie the game before halftime, and were fortunate
to be tied, the way they were playing.
The Buffs didn't look much better in the second half, but did manage to
get on the scoreboard with a Hagan TD pass to Rico Smith on a nice
catch, after their best drive of the afternoon. But OSU came right back
to tie the game, then stopped CU deep in their territory, and blocked
the ensuing punt for a safety.
With very little time left in the game (about 2 minutes), CU began to
drive for the winning score from midfield after an OSU punt. On 2nd
down Hagan injured his ankle, and sophmore QB Vance Joseph came into
the game cold to save the Buffs. On 4th down and 14yds, Joseph made
an incredible scramble, evading three OSU tacklers behind the line of
scrimmage, and then, scrambling to his left, he threw off his wrong
foot to FB James Hill for 17yds and a first down. The Buffs got the
ball down to the OSU 20yd line (or so), there were 14 seconds left.
After OSU called timeouts to ice Jim Harper, CU's placekicker, the Buffs
ran a fake FG, with holder Robbie James rolling away from the OSU rush
and passing to a wide open Christian Fauria (a very wobbly pass, but it
got there) for a TD to win the game. Afterword CU coach Bill McCartney
said the plan was to ground the ball if the play didn't develop, and
then go again on 4th down. An unbelievable way to win the game.
Oklahoma 56, Missouri 16
Mike Gaddis, coming back from major knee surgey, rushed for 217 yards and
4 TD's, including a 56 yard romp in the 2nd quarter.
Oklahoma 7 27 14 7 - 56
Missouri 0 9 0 7 - 16
OU MU
First downs 30 17
Rushes-yards 66-428 20-100
Passing yards 102 239
Return yards 78 11
Passing 11-15-1 18-37-4
Punting 3-120 4-169
Fumbles-lost 0-0 1-0
Penalties 9-72 5-49
Time of poss. 36:32 23:28
Attendance, 30,193
Kansas State 37, Iowa State 7
Paul Watson threw 3 TD's to Michael Smith and ran for another as Kansas State
won it's first road victory in six years. Iowa State QB Kevin Caldwell had
50 yards rushing and a 41 yard TD to Lamont Hill in the first quarter, but only
gained 19 yard in 13 carries for the remainder of the game.
Kansas State 7 14 7 9 - 37
Iowa State 7 0 0 0 - 7
KS ISU
First downs 23 12
Rushes-yards 44-231 47-124
Passing yards 209 152
Return yard 41 58
Passing 20-27-0 8-14-1
Punts 8-70 4-38
Fumbles-lost 1-1 1-1
Penalties 8-70 4-38
Time of poss. 32:43 27:17
Attendance 37,052
Next week (Nov 16th):
Iowa State at Nebraska
Kansas at Colorado
Oklahoma State at Oklahoma
Missouri at Kansas State
Conference Standings:
Conference Overall
W L T W L T
Nebraska 4 0 1 7 1 1
Colorado 4 0 1 6 2 1
Oklahoma 4 1 0 7 2 0
Kansas State 2 3 0 5 4 0
Kansas 2 3 0 5 4 0
Iowa State 1 3 1 3 5 1
Missouri 1 4 0 3 5 1
Oklahoma State 0 4 1 0 8 1
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
manager of the huskers mailing list: [email protected] for details
|
18.368 | Big Eight Preview (Nov 16th) | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Nov 14 1991 11:12 | 71 |
| Article 8273
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!sparky!dsndata!tssi!nolan
From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Eight Preview (Nov 16th)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 13 Nov 91 17:48:32 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected]
Organization: Tailored Software Services, Inc.
Lines: 60
Still substituting for Scott. Now I realize how much work he puts into
this thing week after week. I had to promise him I wouldn't show him up
on the accuracy of predictions. :-)
Nebraska I-back Calvin Jones was Big Eight Offensive Player of the Week, also
Sporting News Player of the Week. Oklahoma State defensive end Jason Gildon
was the Big Eight Defensive Player of the Week.
Sagarin's power ratings:
rank rating record schedule strength
6 Nebraska 91.82 7-1-1 74.93 #11 in AP poll
11 Colorado 87.48 6-2-1 75.69 #16 in AP poll
14 Oklahoma 86.03 7-2-0 70.43 #18 in AP poll
41 Kansas 75.41 5-4-0 73.39
49 Kansas State 73.75 5-4-0 73.25
69 Missouri 68.69 3-5-1 77.75
88 Oklahoma St. 64.69 0-8-1 78.44
89 Iowa State 64.65 3-5-1 71.09
Iowa State at Nebraska (Nebraska by 37)
The final warmup before The Game, despite what Colorado fans think. NU got
embarassed in the first quarter against Kansas, but Iowa State isn't Kansas.
Look for a shutout by the first string NU defense, possibly by the 2nd string
as well. Iowa coach Jim Walden may not have been kidding when he said that
he thought his team should be allowed to play the Nebraska freshman team. The
big suspense for NU may be which I-back they use: Derek Brown or Calvin Jones.
Won't matter much either way for the Cyclones, though. Nebraska should be
able to score at will. NU's consecutive home sellout streak is also on the
line, as Iowa State returned over a thousand tickets this week.
Nebraska 63, Iowa State 10.
Kansas at Colorado (Colorado by 18)
So which versions of the Colorado and Kansas teams are going to show up?
Who knows! Kansas showed Nebraska it can score, Colorado seems to have
lost its focus, struggling past winless Oklahoma State. Bowl reps are
going to be looking at both teams, so both teams should be paying attention.
Colorado isn't as good as last year, but they'll have enough to take
Kansas down a notch in the 'buffs final home game of '91 .
Colorado 39, Kansas 21
Oklahoma State at Oklahoma (Oklahoma by 31)
The battle for state bragging rights, we know who wins this one!
Was Oklahoma State lucky against Colorado? Maybe, maybe not, but this game
is in Norman, and the OU seniors are playing their final home game.
Oklahoma 73, Oklahoma State 10
Missouri at Kansas State (Kansas State by 9)
A Kansas State win would probably lock up a bowl bid. Missouri should
play better than they did against Oklahoma, but home field advantage is
to Kansas State, and its the final home game.
Kansas State 24, Missouri 18
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
manager of the huskers mailing list: [email protected] for details
|
18.369 | I'm sticking to it... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:26 | 49 |
| Article 8506
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!csc32.enet.dec.com!m_henderson
From: [email protected] (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Oklahoma at Nebraska
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 15 Nov 91 15:12:14 GMT
Sender: [email protected]
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 36
OK, I'll be the first to start this one up. Oklahoma at Nebraska. I know
I'm a little early but you KNOW both teams will win Saturday.
Since this is OU and not CU, maybee we can have some intellegent
conversation about this one. ;^)
I will predict Nebraska by more than 9. Bold I know but I feel that NU is
the better team and we have a lot to play for. I think the Memorial Stadium
crowd will be out for blood also. Last years uncharacteristic blow-out AND
the chance to send CU to the Toilet Bowl should help motivation from both
the crowd and the team. Believe me, that's on NU fans minds. I also base that
prediction on the fact that NU finally has a QB who has a little poise when
the Huskers are down and can throw the ball pretty well. Plus, I say that
OU still can't pass worth squat and EVERYONE knows what Nebraska's problem
is on D.
You know, it just dosent seem the same to me as when Switzer was coach. Not
that I am a big Switzer fan but he was one heck of a coach, that's for sure.
Even Switzer admits that the OU/NU series has been a great one and that NU
has provided great competition thru the years. Switzer just had this way
about him that could psych you out and I'm sure that was at least patially
responible for some of those last minute OU wins over NU, and there were
lots of last minute 3 point wins.
Last night playing basketball someone said that Gundy is out? Is this true?
Go Big Red of the North !!! Win so we can get creamed by FSU ;^)
Nebraska Marty
______________________________________________________________
Those who are addicted to Summer's folly are never quite at
peace with themselves as those who can appreciate the beauty
of each passing season.
______________________________________________________________
|
18.370 | Buffalo tracks in the sand | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Nov 15 1991 18:04 | 28 |
| Marty,
I believe Gundy had an emergency hernia operation last weekend. I
heard that thay still hope to have him ready for the Husker game. However,
it's hard for me to believe that a guy can recover from a hernia operation
in 2 1/2 weeks. Maybe there's more to it than what I read in the paper.
With or without Gundy(who I think is overrated), I see the game
this way: The Sooners have a much better defense. The Huskers have a
much better offense. However, the margin between the 2 offenses is bigger
than between the 2 defenses. Also, the Sooners must be effective passing
to fully exploit the Husker defense. So far they haven't impressed anyone
with their passing attack and Gundy may not play. I think the Huskers are
a better team by 2 points. I'll give the Husker's another 2 points for
home field advantage so I pick NU by 4.
You can bet both teams will be sky high for this game so anything
can happen. I'm sure we'll all enjoy watching another good college game.
Oh Marty, by the way, what kind of corn are the Huskers feeding their
running backs. They must have a secret formula. I mean, after all, they
put a 3rd string back in a close game and all he does is run for 294 yards.
That's impressive.
Go Sooner's, stomp the Husker's. CU at the beach, 3 years in a row.
Keith
|
18.371 | Feeling a little bit better about a lost OU season | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 18 1991 09:48 | 28 |
|
If Gundy is healthy and plays, the Sooners will win. Not because
I think he's the savior, but because he's enough to get them over
the top. The offense is peaking late in the season with the
re-emergence of Mike Gaddis. I don't know what happened, but as
soon as I wrote the Sooners off after the first half of this year
as completely second-rate, they woke up and started scoring a few
points while the defense tightened up. Maybe it's just been the
competition, admittedly weak (although Kansas and Kansas State gave
OU less trouble than they did CU and NU); I don't know.
What's the deal with Colorado? The way they're finishing this season
up they're lucky to be going anywhere. I'm sitting in Beaver Stadium
with Mike Leary (more on this later) when I hear that they've missed
a two-point conversion late in the fourth period. Great, I'm thinking
to myself, they've finally gone and blown one of these nail-biters.
Then later the news that they've pulled it out of the coals yet
again! I guess a brawl for it all in Lincoln just isn't in the making.
Or can CU flirt with disaster just one more time next week at Iowa
State?
Actually, with a win over Nebraska a trip to the Blockbuster against
Alabama (great traditions there!) might be preferable to an Orange
Bowl berth. Whoever ends up there is just gonna be fodder for that
Miami machine on their home field again...
glenn
|
18.372 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:01 | 24 |
|
You ain't kidding Glen. I listened to the CU-OSU game and
watched the 2cd half of the CU-KU game. I wrote them off
in both games only to have them pull it out.
CU was down 1 with a little more than 3 minutes left. They
had the ball and it was 4th and 10 (or a little more). They
had faked a field goal late in the game against OSU the
week before. Everybody in the stadium thought the same thing
I did....Mac is gonna fake this. KU didn't even put a man
back fer Chrissakes! He still faked it. KU ate it up. The
D held and they called timeout after each play. The KU kicker
kicked it into the endzone for a touchback. There's slightly
over two minutes left, CU has no timeouts, and the field is
slicker'n owl $hit. CU proceeds to drive right down the field
behind the passing of their 2cd string QB (Vance Joseph) and the
running of Lamont Warren (a true freshman). The TD was scored
by their fullback Hill on a dive play. I couldn't believe it
You should have seen how they got down by 2 TDs! Three straight
fumbles on succesive plays that KU converted into 2 TDs. I
was stunned.
Claybone
|
18.373 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:15 | 21 |
| Caught the 2nd half of KU-CU after the Miami-FSU game. When KU was up
24-10 and had the ball in CU territory I thought it was over. But then
CU held them and started to get some of those turnovers back. I was
surprised Mac went for 2 after the TD that made it 24-23, but he said a
tie was as bad as a loss and I agree with that. CU was down by 1 with
about 2 minutes left and drove 80 yards with no timeouts. Vance made
another incredible play this week with a long run on 3rd and 27. The
Buffs continue to have problems with teams blitzing and stacking the
line of scrimmage. And if they go to the Orange Bowl against Miami's
defense? Well, let's just say it won't be pretty for CU.
You're right Claybone, you could see that fake punt coming a mile away.
If KU could've gotten one more first down it probably would've been
over.
Anybody see that TD catch by the KU receiver when he was falling on his
back? Great catch. Plus he was interferred with and I don't think it
was called.
Joe
|
18.374 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:27 | 27 |
| One thing is for sure, CU always plays entertaining football. In this case,
they played down to their competition. After those 3 fumbles in a row by
CU, I though there was no way they could come back and win. They were also
completely outplayed in the first half but managed to be tied at 10 all
because of a 50 yard, in the air, pass by tailback Lamont Warren to Charles
Johnson. This game reminded me a lot of last years game with Nebraska.
In that game, Eric Bieniemy fumbled 4 or 5 times but came back and scored
4 TDs in the 4th period. There was a number of times KU could have put the
game away. At the end of the 1st half, they had the ball on the CU 1 yard
line but couldn't score. Late in the 4th quarter, they pushed CU back to
the 3 yard line. CU had 3rd and 27 to go for a first down when Vance Joseph
ran the option, kept the ball and ran 32 yards for a 1st down.
If CU keeps playing like this, I'm going to have all white hair by the end
of the season.
Hey, Joe, you were at the game weren't you ? What was it like watching this
game from the stands ?
There was an article in the Sunday Rocky Mtn News that said CU may be better
off going to the Blockbuster Bowl and playing Alabama. I think they can beat
Alabama but a win over Miami would take a near miracle with Miami's home
field advantage. But if Miami goes into the game expecting a national champion
coronation and over look the competition, who knows what might happen.
Keith
|
18.375 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:27 | 9 |
|
Joe,
Vance's run was great but it wasn't on the game winning
drive. He did it on the drive where they had to punt, uhm,
I mean fake the punt. It did get them out of a big hole
though.
Claybone
|
18.376 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:01 | 22 |
| > Late in the 4th quarter, they pushed CU back to
> the 3 yard line. CU had 3rd and 27 to go for a first down when Vance Joseph
> ran the option, kept the ball and ran 32 yards for a 1st down.
This is the one I was talking about, Claybone. I thought it was on
their game-winning drive.
> Hey, Joe, you were at the game weren't you ? What was it like watching this
> game from the stands ?
No. As I mentioned in another note, I wimped out and decided to stay
home. Miami-FSU game being on (I still say it should've been a night
game) combined with the bad weather combined with the fact that my wife
wanted me to stay home, well, I decided to stay home. Plus the CU game
was on TV.
This was the best football weekend for me in a looooong time. About
the only bad thing I can find about this weekend was that the Faiders
won.
Joe
|
18.377 | Big Eight Standings | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 19 1991 11:21 | 22 |
| Conf. All
Nebraska 5-0-1 8-1-1
Colorado 5-0-1 7-2-1
Oklahoma 5-1 8-2
Kansas St. 3-3 6-4
Kansas 2-4 5-5
Iowa St. 1-4-1 3-6-1
Missouri 1-5 3-6-1
Oklahoma St. 0-5-1 0-9-1
This week's games & spreads:
Colorado (-22) at Iowa State
Kansas State (-9.5) at Oklahoma State
Missouri (+15) at Kansas
The only other game remaining after this weekend is Oklahoma at Nebraska
on November 29th (the Friday after Thanksgiving).
Joe
|
18.378 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 14:18 | 28 |
| The Buffs closed out the regular season with their 3rd straight
unimpressive victory over a weak opponent as they beat Iowa State 17-14.
And for the 3rd time in their past 4 games the weather was very bad.
The field looked like a frozen tundra and the wind-chill factor was
18-below. There were only an estimated 1500 fans at the game.
Here's the Big 8 standings with only Friday's OU-NU game remaining. If
NU wins the Huskers go to the Orange and CU goes to the Blockbuster
against Alabama as co-Big 8 champs. If OU wins then CU goes to the
Orange as outright Big 8 champs against the Canes.
Conf. All
Colorado 6-0-1 8-2-1
Nebraska 5-0-1 8-1-1
Oklahoma 5-1 8-2
Kansas St. 4-3 7-4
Kansas 3-4 6-5
Iowa St. 1-5-1 3-7-1
Missouri 1-6 3-7-1
Oklahoma St. 0-6-1 0-10-1
This week's games & spreads:
Oklahoma (+6.5) at Nebraska, Friday
Joe
|
18.379 | | FRETZ::HEISER | donderfliegen! | Mon Nov 25 1991 14:53 | 20 |
| Article 648 of clari.news.sports.college:
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: clari.news.yuppies,clari.news.sports
Subject: University of Colorado to change nicknames, logos, and mascots
Date: 25 Nov 91 10:57:38 GMT
Priority: regular
DENVER, Colo. (UPI) -- A University of Colorado spokesperson
announced today that the school will be changing its name to pledge
full support of the ''Yuppie'' movement. Effective immediately, they
will no longer be known as the Buffs. The new name is ''Biffs'', and
the logo and mascot will also change. The logo is now the infamous
Levi's Docker logo, velour shorts are optional. In exchange for the
publicity, Levi Strauss has agreed to supply the mascot's wardrobe.
Steve, aka Marcie's husband on FOX's ''Married With Children'', has
resurfaced as the Biffs new mascot. Unconfirmed reports have the
cheerleading squads renaming themselves to the ''Muffys''.
The NCAA office is reported to be perplexed about the decision.
An NCAA spokesperson said, ''...they seem to be seeking recognition
through bizarre behavior.''
|
18.380 | Just Wondering ..... | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 25 1991 15:45 | 4 |
| Hey Mike... What is it with you and Childs ? You guys hate
Colorado or what !! ;^)
Big Game
|
18.381 | GO BIG RED of the NORTH !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 25 1991 16:50 | 4 |
| What's the story on TV for THE game? I heard it was on ABC? Anyone know what
network for sure and what gametime is?
Nebraska Marty
|
18.382 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 17:18 | 4 |
| Game's on ABC. Not sure about the time, I think it's 11:30.
Joe
|
18.383 | Big Eight Review(11-25-91) | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Nov 25 1991 17:21 | 192 |
| Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!scott
From: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Eight Review(11-25-91)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 25 Nov 91 20:24:46 GMT
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Lines: 180
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: scott
Results
CU 17 ISU 14
KU 53 MU 29
KSU 36 OSU 26
-------------------------------------------
Missouri 29 Kansas 53
Well, for those who haven't heard.... Tony Sands set an
NCAA record for most rushes and rushing yards Saturday.
He had 58 carries for 396 yards. Kent Kitzmann(Minn)
had 57 carries in 1977, while San DiegoSt's Marshall
Faulk had 386 set earlier this year. It capped KU's
first winning season since 1981. The 53pts were the
most scored against the Tigers. But MU was only trailing
10-0 after teh first quarter, despite losing Phil Johnson
to a seperated shoulder during the second play of the game.
MU used a ton of trick plays including fake FGs and WR to
WR passes. And it was only 25-22 KU at the half. But KU
ate up 513yds on the ground and 43:00 of the clock to control
the game. Mizzou had fumbled two kickoffs which went for
scores, while KU was giveaway free.
MU 0 22 7 0 -29
KU 10 15 14 14 -53
KU 26FG Eichloff
KU Sands 6run(Eichloff kick)
MU Handy 8run(Jacke kick)
KU Sands 8run(Hilleary pass to Vang after fumbled snap)
MU Bailey 39pass from Leach(Washington run)
KU Hilleary 4run(Eichloff kick)
MU Bailey 12pass from Handy(Jacke kick)
KU Hilleary 4run(Eichloff kick)
MU Bailey 5pass from Handy(Jacke kick)
KU Sands 9run(Eichloff kick)
KU Sands 7run(Eichloff kick)
KU Hilleary 2run(Eichloff kick)
MU KU
First Downs: 16 32
Rushes-yards 17-67 82-513
Passing yards 304 135
Return 6 0
Passing 19-30-0 9-14-0
Punts 6-30 2-36
Fumbles-lost 3-3 0-0
Penalties 7-62 8-71
Time of poss. 17:00 43:00
Attendance: 28,000(esitmated)
Rushing: MU-Freeman 9-27, Johnson 1-11, Washington 6-11
KU-Sands 58-396,Hilleary 13-80, Gay 1-16
Passing: MU-Handy 17-28-0-245,Leach 1-1-0-39,Sallee 1-1-0-20
KU-Hilleary 8-12-0-107,Thomas 1-2-0-28
Receiving: MU-Bailey 7-124, Sallee 4-83, Freeman 3-27
KU-Willeford 2-45,Drayton 2-14, Vang 1-36
-----------------------------------
Kansas State 36 Oklahoma State 26
KSU ran out to a 19-0 lead when OSU threw a hail-mary at
the end of the 1st half that was caught by Kirksey. KSU's
defense seemed to have the answers with two fumble recoveries,
two interceptions, one blocked punt and one incomplete pass
on a punt(by a bad snap).
KSU is now 7-4, most wins since 1954 and best Big8 record
4-3 since 1970 and closed the season with 3 straight wins
since 1934. Eric Gallon finished with 1,102 yds for the
season(3rd 'Cat to ever do that) and second behind Isaac
Jackson(1,137yds in 1973). TE Russ Campbell had 8 catches
for 169yds and only 2 other Cats had more recieving yds.
Paul Watson,QB, ended up with 2,311 air-yds second only
to Lynn Dickey with 2,476 in 1969. Only Micheal Smith
didn't get his 29yds he needed to move into second place
on the Big8's all-time recieving list. OSU ended the
season 0-10-1, worst since 1920. One good outlook is
that they only lost 11SRs and most of the starters were
Fr and Sophs.
KSU 10 9 3 14 -36
OSU 0 6 6 14 -26
KSU Coleman 14pass from Watson(Wright kick)
KSU 34FG Wright
KSU 30FG Wright
KSU Gallon 30run(pass failed)
OSU Kirksey 35pass from Ford(kick failed)
KSU 33FG Wright
OSU Milliner 27pass from Ford(pass failed)
KSU Madden 1run(Wright kick)
OSU Kirksey 10pass from Scott(Myers kick)
KSU Campbell 27pass from Watson(Wright kick)
OSU Milliner 4pass from Scott(Myers kick)
KSU OSU
First downs 24 18
Rushes-yards 57-195 28-113
Passing yards 227 276
Return 38 14
Passing 14-32-2 17-42-2
Punts 3-40 5-26
Fumbles-lost 2-1 4-2
Penalties 6-54 7-44
Time of poss 38:45 21:15
Attendance 17,800
Individual stats:
Rushing: KSU-Gallon 33-176, JJSmith 6-26, Madden 4-2
OSU-Denson 15-102, Franks 5-13, Milliner 1-4
Passing: KSU-Watson 14-32-2-227
OSU-Ford 11-29-2-216, Scott 6-12-0-60,Vincent 0-1-0-0
Receiving: KSU-Campbell 8-169, Hernandez 2-20, Garner 2-18
OSU-Kirksey 8-130, Milliner 3-83, Cheatwood 3-39
-------------------------------------------
Colorado 17 Iowa State 14
CU escaped one more time. In near blizzard conditions, blowing
snow, 20mph winds, windchill of 15below, 3rd back week out of
the last four games. ISU lead 14-10 at the half. CU clinched
at least a tie for the B8 title, their 3rd in a row, which only
NU and OU have done. If OU beats NU, then CU goes to the Orange,
otherwise they'll go to the Blockbuster bowl. Lamont Warren,
CU's Fr RB, ran for 168yds, season high. Hagan tied Steve Vogel's
school record of 27TD passes. Only 2,500 showed up for the game
despite selling 36,256 tickets.
CU 3 7 7 0 -17
ISU 7 7 0 0 -14
ISU Knott 12run(Stewart kick)
CU 22FG Blottiaux
CU Warren 74run(Blottiaux kick)
ISU Knott 17run(Stewart kick)
CU Brown 8pass from Hagan(Blottiaux kick)
CU ISU
First downs 9 18
Rushes 42-220 59-176
Passing 23 95
Returns 6 0
Passes 2-8-1 9-15-0
Punts 4-46 7-39
Fumbles 1-1 2-1
Penalties 5-25 5-26
Time of poss 22.:26 37:34
Attendance 36,256
Rushing CU-Warren 21-168, Hill 7-26, Hagan 14-26
ISU-Knott 15-103,Williams 5-38, Patterson 9-33
Passing CU-Hagan 2-8-1-23
ISU-Caldwell 9-15-0-95
Receiving CU-Johnson 1-15, Brown 1-8
ISU-Hill 3-43, Knott 3-10, Spencer 2-33
-------------------------------------------
Records
Team conf overall
CU 6-0-1 8-2-1
NU 5-0-1 8-1-1
OU 5-1-0 8-2-0
KSU 4-3-0 7-4-0
KU 3-4-0 6-5-0
ISU 1-5-1 3-7-1
MU 1-6-0 3-7-1
OSU 0-6-1 0-10-1
Next Game 11-29
OU @ NU
--
Scott D. Davis <[email protected]> The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!ksuvax1!deimos!mccall!scott) 615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041 Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
|
18.384 | | FRETZ::HEISER | donderfliegen! | Mon Nov 25 1991 18:02 | 7 |
| > Hey Mike... What is it with you and Childs ? You guys hate
> Colorado or what !! ;^)
I have no fan interest, good or bad, towards the Biffs. I just post
newsworthy articles as I get them off of Usenet.
Mike
|
18.385 | One of those guys, aye !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 25 1991 18:08 | 5 |
| Ha !!! I see..... An instigator.... I know you type !!
;^)
Big Game
|
18.386 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:17 | 4 |
| I hope the Buffs don't go to the Orane bowl. Miami will put a major
hurt on Hagan & co.. 'Bama would be more of CU's pace.
Tim
|
18.387 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:03 | 5 |
|
That depends Tim. If they don't turn the ball over, they
are a damn good team.
Claybone
|
18.388 | JMO | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:09 | 7 |
| Claybroon, CU has had a heck of a time scoring points (who does
that remind you of?). I don't think CU can stop Miami's offense. I
would say the score would be MU 35 CU 20.
To me thats a spanking....
Tim
|
18.389 | CU will have tough time puttin up 20 | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Wed Nov 27 1991 08:36 | 6 |
| Miami really has a hard time putting up a lot of points against
a tough D. With the loss of McGuire, their offense will be hurt
even more. Their monster d usually gets them by. IMO
MikeL
|
18.390 | Oklahoma-Nebraska does not disappoint, yet again | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Nov 29 1991 18:03 | 58 |
|
Well, party hearty tonight, Marty! Your 'Huskers played a heck
of a game in another exciting, smash-mouth entry to this always-
tight series. This time, it was your guys who won out in the comeback
effort. In spite of the score, Nebraska really dominated the game,
but I still thought the Sooners might be able to hold on (what a
goalline stand at the end of the third period!). It was not to be,
though, as I do believe this Husker squad demonstrated the most
character of any I've seen in this rivalry since the 1978 team that
upended what I then and still now believe to have been the best-in-
the-nation Sooners team that year. Result, 1991: Nebraska 19,
Oklahoma 14.
I don't like the prospects of facing that Calvin Jones kid for the
next three years. The kid's a stud. Derek Brown is dangerous,
but Jones gives you the feeling that he's going to pick up the
yardage no matter what. That kind of power and speed is a deadly
combination for the opposing defense.
On the OU side, I'll repeat again, Coach Gary Gibbs has really got
some personal developing to do. With the 14-3 halftime lead, one
more score (even a field goal) probably would have been enough to
put the Huskers away mentally. Considering the weather, I liked
the generally conservative game plan, but a team that runs inside
the tackles 19 out of 20 times is not going to win many football
games. The dropback passing game (supposedly one of Gundy's
strengths) as a change-of-pace in such weather on artificial turf
is really not that dangerous either, as Keithen McCant (great game!)
proved. The option is much more risky. If Gibbs refuses to show
any confidence in Gundy to run a diverse game plan, the kid's
potential will be unnecessarily wasted at Oklahoma. Hell, if you're
going to play the game that way, Coach Gibbs, get an option QB back
in there, and we'll go back to holding track meets, the old-fashioned
Oklahoma way.
And oh yeah, Marty, I thought you 'Huskers were supposed to be classier
than Buffs' fans to be throwing oranges at opposing players! ;-)
(Just teasing; if I were a 19-year-old college kid in such an
environment I'd probably be loosening the old arm up for the Orange
Bowl, too...)
Finally, I guess it should be noted that this year's game also
commemorated the 20th anniversary of the famous "Greatest Game Ever
Played" in Norman in 1971, won by Nebraska 35-31 for the national
championship (since that game, OU has taken some partial but still
not entirely satisfying revenge with a 14-7 series lead). Did you
catch the tape of the Johnny Rodgers' punt runback again, Marty?
Did you see the tackle of punter/halfback Joe Wylie who was standing
right in Rodgers' path at the 50-yard-line? I don't ever want to
hear you complaining about non-clipping calls again, pal! ;-)
(That game will be played over and over again, off the field,
forever, I suppose...)
Congrats again and good luck in the Orange Bowl, dude...
glenn
|
18.391 | Those oranges must've been falling from the sky | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:30 | 28 |
| Thanks for nothing, Chokelahoma. Now you get to go play an
Almost Close team, but still won't be able to save your coach's job.
And after OU's poor 2nd-half effort they have the nerve to say they're
one of the 2 best teams in the conference. Yeah, right. That's why OU
has 2 conference losses while CU and NU didn't lose a game in the
conference.
A few of the NU players showed their lack of class after the game by
making some derogatory comments toward CU, especially Mitchell. I
can't wait to hear his comments after Miami kicks their ass up and down
the Orange Bowl field.
What the hell was Gibbs doing by deciding to kick off in the 2nd
half?!? So they got the wind in the 3rd quarter, NU got it in the 4th.
And what did NU do with the 2nd half kickoff? They promptly marched 70
yards for a TD to close the margin to 14-10. I missed the latter part
of the 2nd quarter and all of the 2nd half except NU's first TD drive,
but OU's offense must've taken the early train back to Norman.
Actually, it never really showed up because their 2 TD drives started in
NU territory.
I watched most of the Auburn-Bama game Saturday. Bama's defense looks
pretty good and their offense seems to get the job done when they need
to. The line I saw has CU favored by 1 which is a big surprise to me.
I expected Bama to be favored by about 3-6 points.
Joe
|
18.392 | We can play with Miami, but will probably not win... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:43 | 11 |
| re: -2
Good reply Glen. Thanks.
re: -1
Hmmm, kind of sounds like "SOUR GRAPES" to me!!!
This game could have, and should have been worse than the 5.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.393 | the pot called the kettle black | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:55 | 15 |
|
What's that Martin? No berating of NU fans for throwing
oranges? My, my. You told all CU fans to eat "you know
what" and to be better sports. Now I guess you can realize
that just because a few *idiots* throw stuff doesn't mean
the whole group are jerks.
The NU players were woofing at CU eh? No big deal. Makes
for a good rivalry.
I'll be rooting for NU to upset Miami. Everybody is mailing
it in for Miami already and I just love to see the underdog
pull the upset.
Claybone
|
18.394 | The right team is going to the Orange Bowl from the Big-8... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:19 | 27 |
| re: -1
Clay, I think the orange thing was bad and I'm glad Osborne got on the pa and
told them to stop. One Orange actually hit the QB as he was standing over
center. It's one thing to throw the Orange into the end-zone - 20 yards away
from anyone, but it's another to throw right at the team at as they are about
to run a play (same goes for snowballs). I don't support either and it's bad
news. :^(
This one was sweet. A chance to beat an arch rival AND put that other pesky
team in it's place at the same time. ;^)
I do think it can be a good game in the Orange Bowl. Miami is the odds-on
favorite but the Huskers have improved a lot since Washington. If the NU
coaches can put together a great defensive game-plan AND if the Husker
offense can play turnover-free ball, then Nebraska has a chance. But these are
BIG if's.
CU better get their act together. Bama is no pushover. The way CU has played
the last 3 games makes you wonder just how good (or bad) they are. CU needs
a win in this game.
Who's OU playing in the Gator? I forget.
GO BIG RED !!! YESSSSSSSSS !!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.395 | Wahoos vs Sooners at Gator | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:30 | 11 |
| - Who's OU playing in the Gator? I forget.
My beloved Virginia Cavaliers. 8-2-1 and unbeaten in their final 8
games. ACC POY Matt Blundin at quarterback and ACC COY George Welsh on the
sidelines. No. 3 in the nation in scoring defense and ranked No. 20
right behind Oklahoma in the latest AP poll.
Should be a great game. The Hoos have been stomping on people the last
month or so.
Bob Hunt
|
18.396 | Oklahoma has slipped badly since probation/Switzer departure | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 02 1991 13:06 | 35 |
|
> A few of the NU players showed their lack of class after the game by
> making some derogatory comments toward CU, especially Mitchell. I
> can't wait to hear his comments after Miami kicks their ass up and down
> the Orange Bowl field.
I read an AP article on Saturday that said before the game Darian
Hagan had told Johnny Mitchell to "shut up" (I guess Mitchell's been
talking a lot since the CU game), so in response, after the game,
Mitchell returned the favor and additionally called Colorado "the
luckiest team in America" (not a classy thing to say, but based
on this season's play probably true; Colorado has been very fortunate
in most of their Big 8 games).
> What the hell was Gibbs doing by deciding to kick off in the 2nd
> half?!? So they got the wind in the 3rd quarter, NU got it in the 4th.
Based on what happened in the first half both with the decision to
defer (result: turnover and TD) and with the OU offense sputtering,
this was the one call Gibbs made that I liked. OU was trying to play
a field position game, and kicking off rather than receiving and
going three downs and out (like they eventually did when they finally
got the ball) met that objective. Nebraska did march the field, but
that made little difference. The key to the second half was that NU
spent most of it in OU territory, which is what I'm sure Gibbs feared
would happen when he got the ball and couldn't move it. Still doesn't
excuse Gibbs' ultra, ultra conservative play-calling, of course.
Bob, I think Virginia is at #19 to Oklahoma's #20 in both polls.
Deserve to be, too, as once again OU has beaten no one of any merit
and has lost to all three of the marginally good opponents they've
faced.
glenn
|
18.397 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:38 | 57 |
| I'm finally back from vacation so I can comment on the last few games
and reply to some of the entries.
Yep, the CU win over ISU wasn't impressive but what the score doesn't show
is that the CU defense completely shut down ISU in the 2nd half. Leonard
Renfro played like a young Mean Joe Green. It looks like he'll be an All-
American defensive tackle and a possible high NFL draft pick before his
CU career is over. The weather in that game was as bad as it gets. They
almost postponed the game.
Count me as another one who hopes he doesn't hear Marty complaining about
oranges, snowballs and CU fans. I've never seen as many oranges thrown as
in the NU-OU game. No matter what game you watch, there will always be
be some jerks who make everybody else look bad.
Nebraska played an excellent game against OU. This team definately has
more character than the NU teams of the last 2 years. Even though everytime
Johnny Mitchell opens his mouth, a lot of smoke comes out, I'll give
him credit for being one of the best college tight ends I've ever seen.
And that puts him in the company of guys like Mike Ditka and Keith Jackson.
With Mitchell, Derek Brown and Calvin Jones, NU will be very tough to
beat in the coming years unless those players enter the NFL draft early.
The big question for NU next year will be who plays QB. Senior, Keithen
McCant is the best NU QB I've seen in a long time. As Darian Hagan said,
I don't see why they didn't play him for the last few years. He'll be hard
to replace. Everybody expects NU to get blown away in the Orange Bowl but
I wouldn't be surprised to see NU pull an upset. Like I said, this team
has more character that the Osborn teams of the last few years. If they
can establish a running game, McCant will be able to hit Mitchell
and Bostick for some big gains. The big question is, can the NU defense
stop the Miami passing attack ? Probably not.
>This one was sweet. A chance to beat an arch rival AND put that other pesky
>team in it's place at the same time. ;^)
Yep, they sure put that pesky team in their place by getting a tie. Like
I said about 20 replys earlier, NU now considers a tie with CU to be a
victory.
I'm surprised nobody picked up the latest news on the Buffs. First, McCartney
suspended 3 players for one year. Mac wouldn't disclose the reason why they
were suspended but the Rocky Mtn News said that they may have used a fellow
teammates credit card to purchase some sporting goods without permission
from the credit card owner. Two of the players are walkons and are
far down on the depth chart. However, the other one is a guy named
Kontroy Barber who was the nations most highly recruited fullback last
year. He was redshirted this year. CU had big plans for this guy but it
looks like it will be 1993 before he plays. The second big piece of news
is that Kent Kahl is going to transfer to another school. He was unhappy
about losing his starting job to Lamont Warren and will not play in the
Blockbuster Bowl. They didn't say what school he is transfering to but
it will not be another Big 8 team or Colorado State Univ. I'm sorry to
see him go as he's an excellent backup tailback but Mac can't keep a talented
player like Warren off the field.
Keith
|
18.398 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:20 | 17 |
| > They didn't say what school he is transfering to but
> it will not be another Big 8 team or Colorado State Univ.
One rumor I read said that he's interested in the University
of Iowa. Although he didn't admit, it just sounds like he's somewhat
sore about his lack of playing time and losing his starting position.
More on OU-NU:
I missed most of the 2nd half, but I understand Dr. Tom took a couple
of 4th down gambles. First they had a 4th and goal but didn't make it.
But the big one came late in the game with OU leading by 1 and NU was
at the OU 19-yard line and had 4th and 2. NU went for it, made it, and
eventually scored the winning TD.
Joe
|
18.399 | I also have newfound respect for Nebraska... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:23 | 25 |
|
> Everybody expects NU to get blown away in the Orange Bowl but
> I wouldn't be surprised to see NU pull an upset. Like I said, this team
> has more character that the Osborn teams of the last few years. If they
> can establish a running game, McCant will be able to hit Mitchell
> and Bostick for some big gains.
I agree with this, and it may not even have all that much to do
with character (although this team seems to have a lot more of that,
too). If Nebraska can get that big Earl Campbell-like (note I only
said "like") Calvin Jones rolling and chew some clock, they might
indeed catch Miami by surprise. I wouldn't have said that before the
OU game, and I'm only saying it now because OU had the dominant rushing
defense in the Big 8 this season yet was just thoroughly outplayed at
the line of scrimmage by Nebraska.
The most impressive thing about this year's Miami team has been
their ability to win (FSU and Penn State), not to win impressively.
Nebraska's secondary might be toast material, but Gino Toretta is
the Miami QB least equipped to take advantage of that weakness since
pre-Jim Kelly. Yet another reason why this game could at the very
least be interesting well into the second half...
glenn
|
18.400 | More on the game: lousy punt coverage play cost big time | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:33 | 28 |
|
> I missed most of the 2nd half, but I understand Dr. Tom took a couple
> of 4th down gambles. First they had a 4th and goal but didn't make it.
> But the big one came late in the game with OU leading by 1 and NU was
> at the OU 19-yard line and had 4th and 2. NU went for it, made it, and
> eventually scored the winning TD.
Yep. It wasn't really that big of a risk considering the weather
and the way Nebraska's offense had been rolling on the ground, though.
I for one was hoping that Osborne would take the cowardly way out
and send the field goal kicker in, because from OU's perspective
I'd gladly have taken my chances on one play, the field goal for
the game, win or lose. But Osborne was smarter than that.
There was another, subtler play that made the difference for OU,
though. Before Nebraska's last drive, OU's punter hit a beautiful
pooch kick inside the five. The ball was rolling pretty slowly, and
might not have even made the end zone, but in any case the OU coverage
men had plenty of time to get down, settled and cover it as close
to the goal line as they wanted. But no (!), these bonehaids come
flying in, banging into each other and slide the full five yards
into the end zone with the ball. Next play, reverse Nebraska, big
gain. Heads-up punt coverage would have required Nebraska to go
99 yards, and to be conservative and go up the middle on first down
from inside the one. That was a huge play...
glenn
|
18.401 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Dec 02 1991 18:00 | 18 |
| > Before Nebraska's last drive, OU's punter hit a beautiful
> pooch kick inside the five.
Yea, I remember that kick. At first it looked like the OU player made a
great play and controlled the ball. But the replay clearly showed the ball
rolling around as he slid into the end zone. It's too bad because the ball
might have stopped before the goal without anyone touching it. I think the
OU defense would have been fired up and stopped NU. Then, they would have
been punting from their endzone and OU would have gotten their best field
position of the 2nd half. That punt may have won the game for OU if it
was successfully downed at the 1.
It's obvious that Gundy didn't have a good game but I think a lot of the
blame can be spread around. The receivers didn't get open that often and
when they did, they didn't make the tough catches whereas NU did. OU
really needs to work on their passing attack.
Keith
|
18.402 | Gundy has two years left; LET'S USE HIM! | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 03 1991 11:00 | 23 |
|
> It's obvious that Gundy didn't have a good game but I think a lot of the
> blame can be spread around. The receivers didn't get open that often and
> when they did, they didn't make the tough catches whereas NU did. OU
> really needs to work on their passing attack.
I can't come to that conclusion or any of the others that have been
drawn about Gundy this season, Keith, not with the conservatism
of the offense. Gundy threw the ball *three* times (completing
one) before Nebraska took the lead with a couple minutes to go. OU
doesn't run the option anymore, Gundy didn't fumble away any snaps
or make any bad pitches, therefore I can only conclude that he did
what was asked of him in this limited role. And in fact, that's
the way it's been all year, as Gundy has completed well over 50%
of his passes over the number of times he's been allowed to throw.
I frankly don't understand what the coaching staff is thinking about.
Oklahoma does need to get some decent receivers, though. That was
probably their weakest position this year.
glenn
|
18.403 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Dec 03 1991 11:30 | 8 |
| Glenn,
Paul Brown used to say, "If you have a big gun, shot it". Gundy
is supposed to be a big gun but so far he's been under utilized.
His receivers are not that great but I'm also beginning to wonder
if Gibb's and company know how to develope and coach a passing attack.
Keith
|
18.404 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Hulk'sPlight-ThighShudderingDelight | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:25 | 7 |
| Why the complaining about fans throwing oranges? What with oranges
being a very good source of vitamin C and this being the cold and flu
season, and the raw rainy conditions on the field, the Nebraska faithful
were just trying to protect these young lads from bacteria and germs. Very
classy move if you ask me.
/Don
|
18.405 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:43 | 48 |
| AP All-Big Eight Team
Offense:
QB - Keithen McCant, Nebraska, Senior
RB - Derek Brown, Nebraska, Sophomore
RB - Tony Sands, Kansas, Senior
RB - Mike Gaddis, Oklahoma, Senior
TE - Johnny Mitchell, Nebraska, Sohpomore
WR - Michael Smith, Kansas State, Senior
C - Jay Leeuwenburg, Colorado, Senior
OL - Will Shields, Nebraska, Junior
OL - Chris Perez, Kansas, Senior
OL - Brian Boerboom, Nebraska, Senior
OL - Brian Brauninger, Oklahoma, Senior
PK - Dan Eichloff, Kansas, Sophomore
Defense:
DL - Joel Steed, Colorado, Senior
DL - Dana Stubblefield, Kansas, Senior
DL - Stacey Satterwhite, Oklahoma State, Senior
DE - Reggie Barnes, Oklahoma, Junior
DE - Jason Gildon, Oklahoma State, Sophomore
LB - Joe Bowden, Oklahoma, Senior
LB - Greg Biekert, Colorado, Junior
LB - Brooks Barta, Kansas State, Junior
DB - Jason Belser, Oklahoma, Senior
DB - Eric Hamilton, Colorado, Junior
DB - Tyrone Legette, Nebraska, Senior
P - Dan Eichloff, Kansas, Sophomore
Buffs on AP All-Big Eight 2nd team:
QB - Darian Hagan, Senior
RB - Lamont Warren, Colorado, Freshman
DL - Leonard Renfro, Sophomore
LB - Chad Brown, Junior
Buffs receiving honorable mention:
Jim Hansen, OL
Ron Woolfork, DE
Mitch Berger, P
Deon Figures, DB
|
18.406 | Orange Bowl Matchup... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:42 | 89 |
| There has already been some discussion about the Miami/Nebraska OB matchup.
Here's my $.02 worth:
General factors - NU can't stop Miami passing game for the whole game.
Game played on Miami's home field.
Miami has better athletes overall, and more team
speed.
Nebraska is a more poised and confident team than
they have been in years.
Nebraska has varied their offensive attack this year,
Miami won't be able to sit and wait for the next
play with 90% probability their guess was right.
(This happened in the '88 OB)
Specific factors - NU * MUST * have ball control. The Huskers must
keep the Canes offense off the field. If they
don't then we will see a scenario similar to the
Husker/Huskies game where the NU D is worn down
and cut like a knife with the passing game. One
of the most important stats for NU will be the
time of possesion stat.
Nebraska must gamble more than normal on defense.
They have to do something out of the ordinary on
D to keep Miami honest. Otherwise Miami will pick
them apart with the passing game. This game is as
much a responsibility of the coaching staff of NU
as it is the players. The NU coaching staff needs to
eat, sleep, and drink... Miami film. They have to
come up with the game-plan of their lives.
Huskers must play error free. Little or no turnovers
and hold those penalties down.
NU must have balence of run and pass. Keep Miami
guessing. Use Bostik, Mitchell, McCant, Jones,
and Brown. All of them frequently.
McCant must keep his head early. In the CU game
Keithen admitted that he was nervous in the 1st
half. He played like he was nervious in the 1st
quarter of the OU game. In BOTH games he played
very well after he settled down. Nebraska can't
afford to fall behind in this one early.
A new Osborne "...ski" play. This could be fun.
Osborne is the inventor of the "fumbarooski" and
a few other plays. A new "...ski" may be in order
for this one.
Natural turf. I don't think NU has played on it
even once this year. Factor in favor of Miami.
My personal thoughts:
Huskers are better off going into this one than they were in '88.
Miami seems to be less of a powerhouse and a little more vulnerable.
Their passing game is very good but not a good as when they had
Testeverdi (sp?) and the present Browns QB (Just can't think of it now).
Huskers seem to have confidence and poise. Osborne said that this team
has come closer to being as good as they can be than ANY of his
previous squads. That says something about this teams mental outlook.
Translation - this is not Osborne's most talented team overall, but
they may be his hardest working ever. They are motivated.
But Miami still has the better athletes overall and more team speed,
not to mention the home field.
I say Miami will win but I don't think it will be a blowout. If NU
plays a near perfect game with some nice new twists on D, then NU
has the potential to win and it could be very close. If NU makes
stupid mistakes and turnovers, then you can mail in the stats, it's a
blowout.
I say Miami by 14 or less but Huskers to make it a game. :^(
Interesting how in the past NU has been the team people wanted to
see get beat. Now that NU has been down (At least by NU standards
and national expectations) and they are playing the bid bad powerhouse
team, folks seem to be pulling for the Huskers more. I guess it's true,
people like an underdog.
GO BIG RED !!! Pull out the UPSET !!! BEAT THE BAD GUYS, BEAT MIAMI !!!!!
Nebraska Marty
|
18.407 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:05 | 20 |
| Nebraska played on grass at ASU.
I think how much Miami wins by, if they do win, will be dictated more
by the Canes. If they don't hurt themselves by penalties and turnovers
Miami will win pretty easy. If you look at the few games Miami has
lost over the past 5 years or so, they usually lost the game because of
turnovers. They've overcome the penalties easily before (last year's
Cotton Bowl), but in a close game against a quality opponent it could
end up costing them. I just feel if Miami's gonna lose, they'll need
to give the Huskers some help. You can bet the NU coaches are watching
the BC-Miami film over and over again.
We'll see a different Miami team on New Year's night than we've seen on
ESPN the past 2 weeks. They were obviously flat against BC, and
weren't overly impressive against SDSU. The Canes will be pumped up
and the crowd will be *very* loud. It seemed like the Miami crowd was
half-asleep in the SDSU game.
Joe
|
18.408 | Parity... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:11 | 13 |
| re: .405 All Big-8
Notice more balance than previous years. It used to be Ohlahoma with 9 or 10,
Nebraska with 6 or 7, a few other teams with 1 or 2 and some with none.
Now it's Nebraska 6 (With 3 returning)
Kansas 5 (2 returning)
Oklahoma 5 (1 returning)
Colorado 4 (2 returning)
K. State 2 (1 returning)
Ok State 2 (1 returning)
Pretty fair balance.
|
18.409 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:53 | 10 |
| >re: .405 All Big-8
I'm surprised that CU Buff Greg Thomas didn't make the list.
I quess his 7 career blocked kicks don't count for a defensive backfield
player. Some of those blocked kicks made the difference between a win and
a lose for CU.
Keith
|
18.410 | AP all Big-8 1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:45 | 63 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 5-DEC-1991 02:21:42.51
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: AP All Big Eight Team
Administrative note--I'm attempting to make a change in my mailer, but
having less than 100% success. Hopefully this will not interfere with
the list. (Actually, it's *supposed* to improve delivery, but we'll see....)
Well, they announced the AP All-Big-Eight team, and NU's Keithen McCant beat
out CU's Darian Hagan for the 1st team QB slot. (But then, Hagan didn't really
have all that great a season THIS year.) If the Heisman voters were as fair-
minded as the AP conference team voters (apparently) were, the Heisman results
for the past 25 years would have been a LOT different.
The All Big Eight Team is as follows:
(I'm merging two separate lists to produce 1st team and 2nd team side-by-side,
hopefully without introducing any errors in positions like OL and DL, which
is how they were given in the paper.)
1st team 2nd team
OFFENSE
WR Michael Smith, K-St John Bostick, NU
TE Johnny Mitchell, NU Russ Campbell, K-St
OL Jay Leeuwenberg, CU Quentin Neujahr, K-St
OL Will Shields, NU Keith Loneker, Kansas
OL Chris Perez, Kansas Erik Weigert, NU
OL Brian Boerboom, NU Brandon Houston, OU
OL Brian Brauninger, OU Mike Bedosky, MU
QB Keithen McCant, NU Darian Hagan, CU
RB Derek Brown, NU Calvin Jones, NU
RB Tony Sands, Kansas Lamont Warren, CU
RB Mike Gaddis, OU Eric Gallon, K-St
PK Dan Eichloff, Kansas Jeff Jacke, MU
DEFENSE
DL Joel Steed, CU Stacey Dillard, OU
DL Dana Stubblefield, Kansas Leonard Renfro, CU
DL Stacey Satterwhite, Ok-St Pat Engelbert, NU
DE Reggie Barnes, OU Travis Hill, NU
DE Jason GIldon, Ok-St Trey Tippens, OU
LB Joe Bowden, OU Chris Wilson, OU
LB Greg Biekert, CU Chad Brown, CU
LB Brooks Barta, K-St Mike Petko, NU
DB Jason Belser, OU Curtis Cotton, NU
DB Eric Hamilton, CU Mark Dou-Brava, Ia-St
DB Tyrone Leggette, NU Sharron Washington, MU
P Dan Eichloff, Kansas Mike Stigge, NU
---
Michael Nolan
[email protected], [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA29793; Thu, 5 Dec 91 01:22:52 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13519; Thu, 5 Dec 91 03:24:11 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Dec 91 00:40 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 5 Dec 91 00:40 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: AP All Big Eight Team
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.411 | Big-8 QB Stats | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:47 | 206 |
| Article 10231 of rec.sport.football.college:
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!mccall!mccall!scott
From: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: All Big-8 QB ?
Keywords: who ?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 4 Dec 91 21:54:23 GMT
References: <kjnckhINN8q9@cronkite>
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Lines: 189
Nntp-Posting-Host: mis1
Nntp-Posting-User: scott
In article <kjnckhINN8q9@cronkite>, [email protected] (Andy Knipp Metro SE) writes:
>At the start of the season, I guessed that Cale Gundy would make All Big-8
>at QB. Looking at his season, I doubt it. Could someone (Scott) post the
>passing & rushing numbers for the Big-8 QBs ? My guess is that McCant (Neb)
>has the better numbers, but Hagan will probably get it.
>
Funny you should ask. I just got done compiling the Big8 stats from
the paper. I had to edit in the NU and OU stats since the local
paper isn't too bright in waiting till after that game to do it.
I don't have the QB rate pts for McCants or Gundy since I didn't
know how they were figured.
BIG EIGHT STATS(gotten out of Thurs 11-28's paper, so OU and NU
stats were figured in by the game report)
Individual Statistics
RUSHING
Player Car yds avg yds/g
Sands,KU 273 1442 5.3 131.0
Brown,NU 230 1313 5.7 119.4
Gaddis,OU 221 1240 5.6 112.7
Gallon,KSU 224 1102 4.9 100.1
Warren,CU 157 830 5.3 92.2
Jones,NU 108 900 8.3 81.8
McCant,NU 117 654 5.6 59.5
Denson,OSU 150 569 3.8 51.7
Caldwell,ISU 156 428 2.7 42.8
Patterson,ISU 100 467 4.7 42.4
M.Washington,MU 101 420 4.2 38.1
Hilleary,KU 93 400 4.3 36.3
Hill,CU 81 362 4.5 36.2
Hagan,CU 133 386 2.9 35.0
Berrien,OSU 113 349 3.1 34.9
Brewer,OU 43 263 6.1 32.8
Rasheed,OU 77 355 4.6 32.3
JJSmith,KSU 18 157 8.7 31.6
McKinley 88 346 3.9 31.5
Robben,KU 91 316 3.5 28.7
Kahl,CU 70 301 4.3 27.3
Freeman,MU 54 267 4.9 24.2
Achola,NU 26 240 9.2 24.0
Williams,ISU 52 206 4.0 22.8
Rawlings,KSU 41 172 4.2 21.5
Lewis,NU 23 192 8.3 21.3
White,KU 54 228 4.2 20.7
PASSING EFFICIENCY(don't have rating pts for OU or NU)
Player att comp yds td rat pts
McCant,NU 168 97 1454 13
Hagan,CU 170 88 1228 12 128.7
Gundy,OU 172 91 1228 8
Watson,KSU 304 172 2312 10 124.7
Johnson,MU 311 167 2029 14 115.0
Hilleary,KU 188 98 1267 6 114.0
Handy,MU 89 48 565 3 113.9
Caldwell,ISU 57 32 416 1 112.7
Ford,OSU 239 112 1387 7 90.2
Scott,OSU 78 33 411 2 82.2
TOTAL OFFENSE
Player yds ave yds/g
Watson,KSU 2354 5.6 214.0
Johnson,MU 2187 5.7 198.8
McCant,NU 2108 7.4 191.6
Hilleary,KU 1667 5.9 151.5
Hagan,CU 1614 5.3 146.7
Ford,OSU 1534 4.7 139.4
Sands,KU 1442 5.2 131.0
Brown,NU 1313 5.7 119.4
Gaddis,OU 1240 5.6 112.7
Gundy,OU 1207 5.2 109.7
Gallon,KSU 1102 4.9 100.1
Warren,CU 878 5.5 97.5
Jones,NU 900 8.3 81.8
Caldwell,ISU 844 3.9 84.4
Handy,MU 564 5.9 62.6
Denson,OSU 569 3.7 51.7
Patterson,ISU 467 4.7 42.4
Joseph,NU 312 5.5 39.0
Scott,OSU 386 4.5 38.6
M.Washington,MU 420 4.2 38.1
Hill,CU 362 4.4 36.2
Berrien,OSU 349 3.0 34.9
Brewer,OU 263 6.1 32.8
Rasheed,OU 355 4.6 32.3
JJSmith,KSU 157 8.7 31.6
McKinley,OU 346 3.9 31.5
RECEIVING
Player gam ct yds ct/g
Smith,KSU 11 55 768 5.0
Milliner,OSU 11 47 631 4.2
Kirksey,OSU 11 43 614 3.9
Drayton,KU 11 34 439 3.0
Campbell,KSU 11 32 595 2.9
Mitchell,NU 11 31 533 2.8
Holly,MU 11 31 399 2.8
Leach,MU 10 27 316 2.7
Hernandez,KSU 9 23 231 2.5
Warren,OU 11 26 365 2.4
Spencer,ISU 11 25 356 2.2
Bostick,NU 11 24 419 2.2
Long,OU 11 24 302 2.2
S.Brown,CU 11 24 300 2.2
Hill,ISU 11 22 316 2.0
Westbrook,CU 11 22 309 2.0
Gallon,KSU 11 21 247 1.9
Cheatwood,OSU 10 18 230 1.8
Chandler,KU 11 18 345 1.6
Coleman,KSU 11 18 279 1.6
Dunn,MU 9 14 219 1.5
Gay,KU 11 17 232 1.5
Thompson,OSU 10 15 113 1.5
Hughes,NU 8 12 208 1.5
Team Statistics
RUSHING OFFENSE
team car yds yds/g
NU 595 3885 353.2
OU 606 2752 250.2
KU 614 2698 245.3
CU 554 2499 227.2
KSU 469 1756 159.6
ISU 516 1739 158.1
OSU 433 1245 113.2
MU 360 1180 107.3
PASSING OFFENSE
team att comp yds yds/g
MU 406 218 2661 241,9
KSU 338 184 2475 225.0
OSU 318 145 1798 163.5
NU 205 116 1686 153.3
CU 214 112 1589 144.5
KU 231 114 1530 139.1
OU 192 97 1295 117.7
ISU 197 103 1291 117.4
TOTAL OFFENSE
team plays yds yds/g
NU 800 5571 506.5
KSU 807 4231 384.6
KU 845 4228 384.3
CU 768 4088 371.6
OU 798 4047 367.9
MU 766 3841 349.1
OSU 751 3043 276.6
ISU 713 3030 275.4
RUSHING DEFENSE
team car yds yds/g
OU 403 1140 103.6
NU 440 1516 137.8
CU 487 1649 149.9
KU 426 1660 150.9
KSU 486 2001 181.9
OSU 499 2106 191.5
ISU 500 2266 206.0
MU 628 3677 334.3
PASSING DEFENSE(paper didn't include this)
team att comp yds td pts
ISU 250 1824
KSU 272 1864
MU 283 1878
KU 297 1879
CU 286 1886
OU 328 2004
OSU 289 2078
NU 322 2256
TOTAL DEFENSE
team plays yds yds/g
OU 731 3144 285.8
CU 773 3535 321.4
KU 723 3539 321.7
NU 762 3772 342.9
KSU 758 3865 351.4
ISU 750 4090 371.8
OSU 788 4184 380.4
MU 911 5555 505.0
--
Scott D. Davis <[email protected]> The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!rutgers!ksuvax1!deimos!mccall!scott) 615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041 Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
|
18.412 | best regular season game yet except for FSU vs. UM | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Dec 05 1991 13:52 | 15 |
| Great game OU vs. UN last week. Why wasn't I surprised when they
put up that eye-popping stat showing that a high percentage of the
games in this rivalry ended up come-from-behind victories? Early
on it looked like a Tom Osborne nightmare. I credit him for changing
to the north-south game plan, and his QB and that receiver for some
big plays. Never saw so many critical big plays made on 3rd and longs
and 4th downs. That one play where the UN QB dropped the ball, lurched
to grab it, turned, set, read the secondary, tossed a needle-threader
job intentionally high to that receiver who was being sandwiched by
two OU secondary players, made a grab that woulda been most excellent
in the dry but was impossible in the driving rain, and then dropped
five feet to the concrete and *still* held on to it for a giant first
down... college grid at its best.
MrT
|
18.413 | Husker Notes Dec 11th 1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Dec 11 1991 11:44 | 49 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 11-DEC-1991 09:22:30.12
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: husker notes, Dec 11th
There has apparently been enough speculation about sophomore TE Johnny Mitchell
turning pro early that he has been pestered by agents and others, so much so
that he held a press conference Tuesday to announce he will stay at Nebraska
for the 1992 season, then turn pro.
When asked if he would definitely leave after his junior year, Mitchell said,
"You can only get so (much) better at this level. If the Lord's willing and
I'm still healthy, yes."
Mitchell is also interested in getting disability insurance to protect himself
in case he is injured next season. (The NCAA offers top college prospects as
much as $1.8 million in protection coverage, the cost of which is to be repaid
after the player turns pro.)
Cornhusker fans with a healthy wallet but no season ticket at Memorial Stadium
might consider going to next year's Nebraska-Kansas State game in Tokyo,
where the base ticket price will be $75. (And don't even ask what a hot dog
will cost!)
Danny Nee is promising fans that NU will shoot better than 50% from the free
throw line against Wisconsin tonight. The Huskers are 50% from the field
this season, 45.1% from three-point range, and only 57.5% from the line.
After going 3-1 during a four game in eight days stretch, three of them on the
road, NU now has four straight home games, and no road games for three weeks.
The 7th ranked Huskers are favored to win the NCAA Mideast Regional Volleyball
tournament this weekend, in Lincoln. #12 Ohio State plays #16 Penn State, and
the Huskers face unranked Wisconsin in round 1 on Friday. The winners play on
Saturday for an invitation to the Final Four at UCLA's Pauley Pavilion.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA25127; Wed, 11 Dec 91 08:23:29 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16316; Wed, 11 Dec 91 10:24:10 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Dec 91 10:18 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 11 Dec 91 10:18 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: husker notes, Dec 11th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.414 | Husker notes Dec. 12 1991 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Thu Dec 12 1991 17:35 | 41 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 12-DEC-1991 12:19:11.96
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Dec 12th
Wisconsin had whittled a 13 point deficit down to 6 points with 11:46 to play
when NU Coach Danny Nee called his players together and bawled them out.
It took a minute, during which the Badgers closed the gap to two points,
but then the Huskers scored 22 of the next 28, securing their sixth win of
the young season, against one loss. Final score, Nebraska 86, Wisconsin 67.
Danny Nee won his 200th game as a college coach in the process.
NU had 22 turnovers to Wisconsin's 13, but led in blocked shots 7-1, and had
six steals compared to Wisconsin's seven. The Huskers shot 70.8% from the
free throw line (Nee had offered to 'bet the fans a million dollars' that
they would shoot better than 50%) versus Wisconsin's 66.7%. The Huskers shot
55.2% from the field, Wisconsin only 32.1%.
Point guard Jamar Johnson led NU with 20 points, center Derrick Chandler had 17,
and Dapries Owens had 14. Webster (22) and McGee (16) were the only Badgers
in double figures.
In the first half of the double-header, the fifth-ranked Iowa Hawkeyes defeated
the Nebraska women's team 64-59, rallying from six points down in the last 5:22.
The NU women are now 4-2. Only 627 spectators were on hand for this game,
but 11,510 showed up for the men's game.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA25368; Thu, 12 Dec 91 11:20:13 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21256; Thu, 12 Dec 91 13:19:29 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Dec 91 12:52 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 12 Dec 91 12:52 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Dec 12th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.415 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Dec 13 1991 14:58 | 8 |
| I saw in today's paper that CU's offensive coordinator, Gary Barnett, is
the prime candidate for the head coaching job at Northwestern. He will
probably accept it, if offered.
If he comes to terms with Northwestern, this will be the 2nd year in a row
that CU has lost their offensive coordinator.
Keith
|
18.416 | Husker Notes, Dec 16th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:32 | 58 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 16-DEC-1991 10:16:18.49
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Dec 16th
Administrative Note-- The postings to the huskers mailing list are now
being posted on the unl.sports newsgroup on campus. Our thanks to Nancy
Khawand at CRC for setting up the newsgroup and permitting the link. This is
currently a one-directional link, messages sent to the list will be posted to
unl.sports, but postings directly to unl.sports will not be sent automatically
to the list. I may set up a relay mechanism to send those postings to the
subscribers of the list at a future time. For interested readers at unl,
there are currently around 30 subscribers to the huskers mailing list,
distributed rather widely around the USA and extending all the way to Israel.
Most are former UNL students or Nebraskans who get sporadic (at best) coverage
of Nebraska sports in their 'new' homes.
Now that the California Raisin Bowl is over, Nebraska has the dubious
distinction of being the biggest underdog in the 17 remaining bowl games,
at 10 1/2 points. Tom Osborne says he doesn't care whether the Huskers are
underdogs or favorites, the important thing is for the team to play its best.
The team is taking the week off for finals, and then will travel to Florida
where they will resume practice for the Orange Bowl.
The Nebraska Women's Volleyball team was defeated in the finals of the
Midwest Regional Championship on Saturday. (Details forthcoming.)
As might be expected, Nebraska's 1992 scheduling of Middle Tennessee State, a
good Division 1-AA team, is drawing criticism. Omaha World-Herald sportswriter
Tom Shatel writes about Nebraska's 'bully' image, and feels that NU should
cancel out of the contract and seek out one of Long Beach State's abandoned
opponents which would cost the Huskers $100,000 as a cancellation penalty. He
(jokingly?) suggests that the spring game could be postponed until Sep. 12th.
Tom Osborne's position is that a contract is a contract.
Kim Berke, a senior All-American on the UNL bowling team, averaged 247 for
the final four games to win the women's Nebraska Bowling Proprietors
Association U.S. Open qualifying tournament. The U. S. Open will be in
Fountain Valley, CA, in March.
A little sympathy for UN-Kearney, please! Their basketball team shot 59% and
had their third-highest point total ever, but still lost 140-128 to Central
Oklahoma. The 140 points represents the most points ever given up by the team.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA16255; Mon, 16 Dec 91 09:17:14 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA11547; Mon, 16 Dec 91 11:18:41 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Dec 91 11:11 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Mon, 16 Dec 91 11:11 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Dec 16th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.417 | Husker Notes, Dec 17th (WOW - NO FOOTBALL !!!) | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Wed Dec 18 1991 11:32 | 50 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 17-DEC-1991 21:54:57.43
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj:
Scott Saltsman, a 6-2, 255 lb middle guard from Wichita Falls, TX, has
given a non-binding oral commitment to come to Nebraska.
Nebraska center Karen Jennings was named the Big Eight women's basketball
player of the week. The 6-2 junior scored 81 points in 3 games, as the
Huskers won the Illini Invitational in Champaign, IL.
The University of Arizona has asked for permission to talk to UNL Coach
Terry Pettit about their volleball coaching position. Pettit says he has
been contacted before about such openings, and "I'm happy here at Nebraska."
As mentioned earlier, the Huskers were defeated in the finals of the MidEast
Regional NCAA Tournament Saturday by Ohio State, 9-15, 15-9, 17-16, 15-7.
The Huskers finished the season at 27-5.
Nebraska scored four points to break a 9-9 tie in the first game, and
held a 9-5 lead in the 2nd game, but Ohio State scored the final 10 points to
tie the match. Ohio State had a 14-6 point lead in the crucial 3rd game
but the Huskers fought back to take the lead at 15-14. Ohio State then had
back-to-back kills to take a 16-15 lead, but Nebraska had two kills to
retie the score. Ohio State won the tiebreaker after a Nebraska hitting
error. The fourth game was won fairly easily by Ohio State. The
attendance was 3,585.
NU has lost Patrick Hawthorne, a 6-7 forward junior college player who helped
lead Mississippi Gulf Coast JC to a 4th place finish at the National Junior
College tournament last season. Hawthorne had been working on a class at
Southeast Community College in Beatrice, NE, to complete his associates degree,
but has apparently run into difficulties and has left school.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
manager of the huskers mailing list: [email protected] for details
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA25582; Tue, 17 Dec 91 20:55:54 -0800
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA25421; Tue, 17 Dec 91 23:55:52 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21179; Tue, 17 Dec 91 22:57:05 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Dec 91 22:12 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 17 Dec 91 22:12 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Dec 17th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.418 | Fair acquittal of the Big-8 so far... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 30 1991 10:46 | 39 |
|
So what'd you guys think? Is Cale Gundy still overrated? The Sooners
(shock of shocks!) put on one of the most dominant passing displays
I've seen in some time and certainly the most dominant in Oklahoma
history (well, yeah, big deal, I know) in last night's Gator Bowl,
a 48-14 win over slightly favored Virginia. I told you guys that
Gundy just needed to be given the keys to the offense and allowed a
chance to run it...
Better than Gundy was the offensive game plan, though. Gary Gibbs
and, perhaps more pertinently, his offensive coordinator have
definitely saved their jobs for another year. Admittedly, most of
Gundy's work was on short, high-percentage stuff, but when he had to he
did thread a few needles along the way (particularly to the freshman
Albert Hall inside of triple zone coverage on that big gainer in the
second quarter). OU's receivers also showed surprisingly good hands
for being so little used during the season, particularly the tight
ends (Brady and the other guy, the big man) who made some tough
catches. I think Oklahoma's offense just might be okay next year.
Unfortunately, there's always a down side. The heart of the Sooners'
strength this season, their defense (LBs Bowden, Wilson, S Belser) is
moving on. None of these guys will realize much of the credit they
deserve for keeping the program at at least a respectable level
coming out of Barry Switzer's parting gift of a two-year probation.
Colorado looked pretty ragged on offense in a hard-hitting Blockbuster
Bowl game against Alabama. I think their good fortune finally deserted
them, but not before Darien Hagan put one last improbable scare
into the opposition. For a second there, I thought he was going
to pull another one out in his final college game. Gotta tip my cap to
Hagan for a sparkling career at the helm of Colorado's resurgence.
How 'bout that David Palmer kid for 'Bama, though? Punt return
for TD, great outstretched catch for TD, and he takes snaps as an
option QB from time to time too? Wow! When's the last time you
saw that? From the single wing/option offenses of the 1950s?
glenn
|
18.419 | Husker Notes, Dec 23rd | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:02 | 56 |
| Sorry for the delay folks - I was on vacation all last week...
From: DECPA::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 23-DEC-1991 11:46:14.97
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Dec 23rd
The Huskers left for Miami this morning (Monday) and plan to hold a practice
this afternoon and a full scrimmage on Christmas.
Nebraska has received verbal committments from 7 Nebraska students, 6 out-of-
state students, and one junior college player:
RB - Damon Benning, 5-10, 175, Omaha Northwest
OL - Chris Dishman, 6-4, 273, Cozad
LB - Jon Hesse, 6-4, 205, Lincoln Southeast
OL - Jeff Ogard, 6-6, 275, St. Paul
E-LB - T. J. Scribner, 6-3, 220, Omaha Brownell-Talbot
CB - Eric Stokes, 5-10, 175, Lincoln East
LB - Ryan Terwilliger, 6-5, 205, Grant
OLB - Larry Arnold, 6-5, 210, Copley, Ohio
DT - Daryl Gardner, 6-9, 245, Lawton, Oklahoma
DB - Mike Minter, 5-10, 175, Lawton, Oklahoma
QB - Ben Rutz, 6-0, 180, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
MG - Scott Saltsman, 6-2, 255, Wichita Falls, Texas
RB - Marvin Sims, 5-9, 185, Apple Valley, Minnesota
DB - Toby Wright, 6-2, 205, Phoenix College
Because of a little-known conference rule, the Big Eight will buy a share of
Oklahoma's ticket allotment in the Gator Bowl this year. Oklahoma is
responsible for the purchase of 13,000 tickets. But the Big Eight has a rule
that it can buy up to a fourth of a team's allotment to help out financially.
So the Big Eight is buying 3,300 Gator Bowl tickets at $30 each to fill out
Oklahoma's allotment. The $99,000 purchasing price will be split among the
conference schools, meaning each school's bowl take will be $12,375 smaller.
OThe Nebraska men's basketball team won their 4th straight Ameritas Classic
Championship in Lincoln last weekend, defeating Texas A & M on Friday and
Eastern Washington on Saturday. (Details hopefully to follow.)
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA05951; Mon, 23 Dec 91 10:46:52 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09987; Mon, 23 Dec 91 12:50:05 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Dec 91 11:07 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Mon, 23 Dec 91 11:07 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Dec 23rd
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.420 | Husker Notes, Dec 24th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:05 | 36 |
| From: DECPA::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 24-DEC-1991 13:38:02.02
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Dec 24th
The Huskers preparation for the Miami passing attack was delayed as Nebraska
first had to overcome the Continental forklift attack yesterday.
The plane which Nebraska had chartered from Continental Airlines to take the
team to Florida was sitting at a gate in the Denver airport when a forklift
ran into it and poked a hole in its side. This caused a six-hour delay while
a subtitute plane was routed to Lincoln.
The Huskers held their Monday workout in Lincoln rather than in Miami,
and by the time they got to Miami it was too late to do anything but
get something to eat and wait for their luggage.
The delay means that the $30,000 it costs per day to have the team on
the road was effectively wasted. "Really, you wasted a whole day," Tom
Osborne said from Miami Monday night. "We could have basically practiced
in Lincoln, done everything we did today, and come down in the morning."
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA20647; Tue, 24 Dec 91 12:38:54 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00252; Tue, 24 Dec 91 14:41:33 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Dec 91 10:54 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 24 Dec 91 10:54 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Dec 24th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.421 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:36 | 58 |
|
> Colorado looked pretty ragged on offense in a hard-hitting Blockbuster
> Bowl game against Alabama.
McCartney is installing a new offense for next year, and decided to
start with this game. That offense is predominantly a passing attack,
whick Mac feels is necessary to compete with the nation's best teams in
the 90's. This means that Kordell Stewart will undoubtedly be the
starting QB next season because he is bigger than Vance Joseph and is
a better passer. At first I didn't like the decision - why not
wait until spring ball. But now it kind of makes sense to me. If you
wait until spring ball and pick it up again in August practice, you
still won't get the benefit of a game to experiment with the offense
in a game situation before the season. Granted, Hagan won't be running
the offense next year, but most of the offensive personnel will be
back.
McCartney (although he'd probably never admit it) may have essentially
forfeited the Blockbuster Bowl to try a new offense on only 2 weeks
practice. I'm not saying CU wasn't playing to win, but Mac realized
the risk of installing a new offense on short notice and was willing to
take that risk. Let's also give some credit to the Bama defense, one
of the nation's best.
Defensively, CU should be outstanding next year. The Buffs will only
be losing 2 starters on defense to graduation.
This game was one of the strangest games I can recall watching. Both
teams didn't even combine for 100 yards at halftime, yet the score was
12-10, due to special teams and defensive play. Bama returned a punt
for a TD. They also had an interception return to the CU 1-yard line
where the Tide ended up settling for a field goal. The Buffs blocked a
punt and took over at the Bama 4 and proceeded to take it in for a TD a
couple plays later, and the CU defense also recorded a safety. The
only sustained offensive drive in the 1st half that resulted in points
was right before the half when CU drove into field goal range and
converted.
The 2nd half looked like a different game as Alabama scored 3 TD's and
the Buffs scored 2. I'm pretty satisfied with the result, considering
that CU installed a new offense and still had a chance to win with
about a minute left in the game. But I'm *very* excited about next
year. The offensive line will again be the biggest question mark going
into the season, along with how the new offense will progress.
> How 'bout that David Palmer kid for 'Bama, though? Punt return
> for TD, great outstretched catch for TD, and he takes snaps as an
> option QB from time to time too? Wow! When's the last time you
> saw that? From the single wing/option offenses of the 1950s?
I didn't know about him until a few days before the game. He made a
couple of great moves early on in that punt return, and then had
nothing but green grass and blockers in front of him. If he's
showcased enough next year, he could be a Heisman candidate. He's only
a freshman, right?
Joe
|
18.422 | Can't wait until next year !! | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:26 | 39 |
| Joe did a good job of summing up the CU-Bama game. I also think that Mac
knew the risk of installing a new offense but needed to get a head start on
next year's game plan. In fact, I don't remember CU running one option play
all night. I believe Hagan threw 40 times while he averaged 10-15 passes
most of his career. Mac evidently believes the Buffs have the talent at
the skill positions to convert to a passing team. He's very high on freshman
Kordell Stewart at QB even though Vance Joseph has played well when called
upon in pressure situations. QB may be CU's strongest position next year.
Redshirt freshman Westbrook looks like a future NFL receiver. He's got size,
great hands, is rugged and hard to bring down. He also showed more speed
than I though he had when he ran away from the Bama defenders on his 65
yard pass reception. Charles Johnson has shown flashes of brilliance but
has chocked big time on a couple of long passes perfectly thrown by Hagan
this year. Freshman Erik Mitchell who is the fastest CU player with something
like a 4.26 forty will surely see more playing time next year. Most people
think of Lamont Warren as a runner but he's also an excellent receiver out of
the backfield. I like the way Mac adjusts his offense for the talent he has
instead of trying to force the players into an offense they may not be
best suited for.
The offensive line should be better next year but still remains a big
question mark. Another thing I'm worried about is, can Mac and his coaching
staff successfully coach a passing team after running a ground attack offense
for the past 8-10 years ? I'm still optimistic for next year.
It's good to see the Sooner's play well against Virginia. I think it shows
that the Big 8 is a better conference than most people give it credit for
when the 3rd place team completely dominated the Gator bowl. Gundy will
be much more dangerous next year after such a good performance. Gibbs
may not have compiled the record expected by the Sooner fans but he has
brought respectibility to a scandal ridden program. I hope he does well in
the future and wins all of his games next year except for the CU game.
Next stop will be NU-Miami. I don't think Miami is as good as everybody
thinks they are and I think NU is better than most people give them credit
for. I think the game will be much closer than expected but Miami will
probably still win.
Keith
|
18.423 | | CSC32::P_PAPACEK | | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:42 | 13 |
|
I understand Mac's reasoning to start with the new offense in the Bowl.
However I don't agree with it, and it didn't do much for CU as far as
"showcasing" the school. Furthermore, if I were a Senior I wouldn't
really appreciate the coach experimenting with my last game and a chance
to go out a winner. Why not play only Juniors if he wants to practice
for next year? A lot of Seniors worked hard to get to a bowl game -
would he have experimented if a number 1 ranking was on the line?
Bad timing in my opinion.
Pat
|
18.424 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:55 | 23 |
| > I believe Hagan threw 40 times while he averaged 10-15 passes
Keith, Hagan threw 30 times the other night. The Buffs also had 30
runs. To put the new offense in perspective, consider this: the
closest CU came to a 50-50 ratio this year was 44 rushes and 24 passes
in the opener against Wyoming.
> The offensive line should be better next year but still remains a big
> question mark. Another thing I'm worried about is, can Mac and his coaching
> staff successfully coach a passing team after running a ground attack offense
> for the past 8-10 years ? I'm still optimistic for next year.
Hope you're right about the offensive line. CU started using the
wishbone/option in '85 and had good success with it from the start, but a
passing attack is much tougher to convert to.
I was also glad OU won, especially it was the conference's last chance
for a bowl win after the CU loss. Plus, it sure would've been an
embarrassment to the Big 8 if one of their teams would've lost to an
Almost Close team. :^)
Joe
|
18.425 | With over a month off, you often see new looks in bowl games... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 30 1991 13:36 | 20 |
|
I agree that there was probably some thought towards next year with
McCartney installing the new offense, but I disagree that the decision
was in any way a virtual forfeit. That just doesn't make sense.
In spite of Colorado's recent Big 8 title success, in most years for
most programs a Blockbuster berth is the result of a pretty successful
season, and reason enough to play to win as a final result and not a
stepping stone. Alabama's defense is a very tough one. I think
McCartney realized he'd have to have a more balanced offense to beat
that defense. It may have been a wrong decision, but I think it
was one that the Buffs made in a sincere attempt to win the game.
Oklahoma essentially did the same thing in their game last night.
They ran a number of well-designed passing and downfield blocking
schemes that they hadn't used before, and it certainly wasn't out
of sacrifice for next season...
glenn
|
18.426 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 30 1991 15:46 | 4 |
| An OU QB throwing for 300+ yards. I have never seen that! Maybe OU
is going to be changing their scheme?
Tj
|
18.427 | Slipped Big-Time... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Jan 06 1992 13:32 | 10 |
| Final OP Football Poll:
NU 15
OU 16
CU 20
Looks like all 3 programs have a long way to go. This Big-8 is not a powerfull
football conference any more.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.428 | It's not all that bad | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:15 | 21 |
|
> Looks like all 3 programs have a long way to go. This Big-8 is not a powerfull
> football conference any more.
Let's not get panicky, though. Colorado did finish #1 last year and
came close in 1989, and Oklahoma has also won a national title as late
as 1985 and finished the regular season at #1 as late as 1987.
Contrast that with the Big Ten, which hasn't been there since 1968.
Considering that Colorado is now for real and will be for years to
come, and that Kansas and Kansas State have made some strides, I don't
think the Big Eight has much to be ashamed of compared to the days of
the Big Two. Nebraska and Oklahoma can use some work, but in
Oklahoma's case the probation made that very predictable...
If Nebraska would get off their butts on bowl day occasionally (doesn't
mean they actually even have to win, but at least show up), the
conference would be quite respectable.
glenn
|
18.429 | Husker Hoops Update | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | "Jim, not in front of Klingons" | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:58 | 37 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 12-JAN-1992 10:04:46.09
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Nebraska wins at Colorado 84-74
"It was a total team effort", proclaimed Danny Nee, after Nebraska came back
in the 2nd half after trailing by as much as nine in the first half to beat
Colorado 84-74 in the Husker's Big Eight Conference opening game. Soph.
Eric Piatkowski scored 20 points and five Huskers had double figures
(Chandler-11, Hughes-10, Hayes-15, Chubick-10). Nebraska shot 48.4% from
the field, Colorado 43.3%. Nebraska was 16-21 in free throws, Colorado 10-14.
The Huskers also benefit from 8 out of 15 shots from long range, and their
zone defense held Colorado to just 13 points in the final ten minutes.
Nebraska becomes the first Big Eight team to win on the road, as Iowa State
defeated Oklahoma 73-71 in Ames, and Oklahoma State had previously defeated
Kansas State in Stillwater.
Danny Nee has started the NCAA countdown, he figures that Nebraska only needs
six more wins to earn an invitation. A road win is a big help. Nebraska is
now 13-9 in the Coors Events Center in Boulder. Attendance was 6,706.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA28339; Sun, 12 Jan 92 09:05:20 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08399; Sun, 12 Jan 92 11:13:12 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Sun, 12 Jan 92 11:00 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Sun, 12 Jan 92 11:00 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Nebraska wins at Colorado 84-74
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.430 | Husker notes, Jan 23rd Mitchell to NFL Draft... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Commission Report is Fiction | Thu Jan 23 1992 10:36 | 36 |
| From: DECPA::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 23-JAN-1992 08:17:38.59
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: husker notes, Jan 23rd
Nebraska tight end Johnny Mitchell will forgoe his final two years of
eligibility and declare himself eligible for the NFL draft this spring.
This reverses Mitchell's earlier announcement back in December. Since
he was not expected to be available, the NFL scouts have not seriously
evaluated him, but speculation is that he could be a late first round
or early second round draft choice.
Racial tension on campus has increased since Scott Baldwin's alleged assault
of a 23 year old white woman on Saturday. Supporters of both individuals held
separate rallies on campus yesterday. Baldwin is still undergoing evaluation
at the Nebraska Regional Center to determine his competency for trial. The
woman is still hospitalized with a skull fracture and possible brain damage.
Schedule note: The Nebraska-Oklahoma men's basketball game will be on
ESPN next Monday, tipoff at 8:30 central time.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA16833; Thu, 23 Jan 92 07:18:00 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25128; Thu, 23 Jan 92 09:27:53 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Thu, 23 Jan 92 09:09 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 23 Jan 92 09:09 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: husker notes, Jan 23rd
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.431 | Mac's new offense already paying off | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jan 24 1992 09:17 | 8 |
| The Buffs have gotten a verbal commitment from Koy Detmer, Ty's younger
brother. He threw for 8221 yards on 65-percent passing during his
high school career - both are Texas state records. He threw for 2943
yards and 36 TD's this year on a state-record 69-percent completion
percentage.
Joe
|
18.432 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 24 1992 13:35 | 16 |
| I've got mixed feelings about Mitchell going to the NFL. On the one hand,
it will hurt NU and increase the odds of CU defeating them next year. On
the other hand, I think Mitchell was the best tight end in college football
and probably the best player in the Big 8. I'll miss watching his superb
play. He's the first guy that I can remember going to the NFL as a sophmore.
I predict he'll be a big success in the NFL and I think he should be a
#1 pick.
Koy Detmer's High School stats are very impressive. I just hope CU can
attract some more quality receivers and offensive lineman to make him
more effective. Does anybody know big Koy Detmer is ? The only bad rap
about his brother is that he's too small to play in the NFL. With Vance
Joseph and Kordell Stewart ready to tale over for Hagan, I wonder if he'll
be redshirted next year. CU is loaded with quality QB's.
Keith
|
18.433 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:36 | 23 |
| > I've got mixed feelings about Mitchell going to the NFL. On the one hand,
> it will hurt NU and increase the odds of CU defeating them next year. On
> the other hand, I think Mitchell was the best tight end in college football
> and probably the best player in the Big 8. I'll miss watching his superb
> play. He's the first guy that I can remember going to the NFL as a sophmore.
With Mitchell leaving it will certainly take away from the pre-game
trash talk the week before the CU-NU game. I read he's the first
underclassman to leave Nebraska for the NFL draft.
> With Vance
> Joseph and Kordell Stewart ready to tale over for Hagan, I wonder if he'll
> be redshirted next year. CU is loaded with quality QB's.
That's a good point about him being redshirted. I doubt he could come
step in and play much next fall without the benefit of spring ball.
RE: his size
When he first became interested in CU a couple of weeks ago I recall
reading that he is bigger than Ty, but I don't recall his exact size.
Joe
|
18.434 | Koy is 6-1, 160 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:06 | 2 |
|
|
18.435 | More Buff recruiting news | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:23 | 21 |
| Today's Rocky Mtn News reported that a highly recruited running back from
San Diego, Rashaan Salaam, has agreed to attend CU. The CU recruiter's were
reported to be euphoric. It also reported that Chuck Snowden, who was an
excellent backup to Bieniemy but missed last year because of injuries, will
attempt to make a comeback. Ever though Lamont Warren is an excellent
running back, this is great news because there wasn't much talent behind
Warren. If Salaam or suspended Kontroy Barber turn out to be as good as
expected, I wouldn't be surprised to see Warren shifted at least part time
to wide receiver(ala Mike Pritcard) in the coming years. I believe his
chances of becoming a pro may be better at wide receiver.
Now I just wish the newspapers would report that some highly recruited
monster offensive linemen have agreed to attend CU. This is where they
still need the most help.
Also, the CU running back coach complained of chest pains while recruiting
in California. He was rushed back to Denver where he received quaddruple
by-pass heart surgery. He is listed in serious but stable condition.
Keith
|
18.436 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:46 | 13 |
|
> -< Koy is 6-1, 160 >-
Yep, if Koy Detmer is only 160 lbs, I expect the coaches to feed him
a lot of donuts and redshirt him for a year before they put him in a
position where a couple of 300 lb linemen could end his career real fast.
BTW, the first pre-season poll I've heard of has the Buffs listed as #5.
I believe Miami was listed #1 with Washington #2 and Florida #3.
Is it too early to make some preseason predictions ?
Keith
|
18.437 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jan 24 1992 18:07 | 20 |
|
> Now I just wish the newspapers would report that some highly recruited
> monster offensive linemen have agreed to attend CU. This is where they
> still need the most help.
I think we're only hearing about the 'big-name' signees at glamour
positions. Don't forget, all these commitments we're hearing about are
only verbal commitments - nobody has given their John Hancock yet.
We'll know the full story on letter-of-intent day, which should only be
about a week or 2 away.
After seeing Koy's size, I agree that just increases the possibility
they'll redshirt him to give him time to put some weight on.
Keith, whose poll was that and where did you find it? I was surprised
to see Washington at #2 because I thought they were losing quite a few
people - Mario Bailey and Emtman (sp?) in particular.
Joe
|
18.438 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Jan 24 1992 18:24 | 22 |
| > Keith, whose poll was that and where did you find it?
I can't remember. It was briefly mentioned on one of the Denver news
broadcasts, either ch 2 or ch 4.
> We'll know the full story on letter-of-intent day, which should only be
> about a week or 2 away.
All of this verbal-commitment, letter-of-intent stuff is new to me. It's
a lot easier to get information about players in the NFL draft publications.
If you find out any more information about who's going to wear the Black
and Gold, post it here. I'd be interested.
After the Blockbuster Bowl fiasco and all the offensive coaching changes,
I'm actually surprised that CU has gotten a commitment from Detmer and
a couple of other high profile players.
BTW do you know who to contact to order tickets for some of next year's
games. The Oklahoma game could be a great one with the new passing
attacks of both teams.
Keith
|
18.439 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 27 1992 12:06 | 9 |
| Keith,
Players can decide to go to a school whenever they want, it just
doesn't become official until they sign a letter of intent, and that
can't be done until letter-of-intent day, which should be coming up
soon. Anyway, the day after letter-of-intent day the local papers will
have plenty of info on all the Buffs' recruits.
Joe
|
18.440 | | ESKIMO::GARRY | REDSOX IN 92 | Tue Jan 28 1992 10:15 | 6 |
|
Does anyone have the final score from last nites Okie-Nebraska game and
who won. Thanks in advance
Tom
|
18.441 | You're very welcome | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | You were expecting Elmer Fudd?? | Tue Jan 28 1992 10:23 | 3 |
| Oklahoma 79 Nebraska 76
JD
|
18.442 | Sooners rally | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Jan 28 1992 10:47 | 8 |
| Big comeback by the Saooners.
They were down 7 with a minute and a half to go. Got the ball down 76-74
with 30 seconds or so. Brent Price hit a three to go up 77-76. Nebraska
missed a 3 point attempt with about 8 seconds to go. Oklahoma got the
rebound and dunked it for the final score 79-76.
TTom
|
18.443 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 29 1992 11:57 | 16 |
| Hey Keith, you wanted to hear about some big offensive linemen
committing to CU, well here's one for you: Matt Jones, a 6-7 320-pound
tackle committed to CU yesterday. And his high school coach says he's
still growing! He's a 2-time all-state player from Bucyrus (Ohio) HS
and picked CU over Indiana. The Buffs plan to redshirt him and reduce
his weight to about 300 pounds. He is considered to be a project.
Jones is the fifth offensive lineman to commit to CU, joining Chris
Naole (6-4, 290) of Kahuku, Hawaii; Pat Corcoran (6-4, 277 of Bay City
Michigan; Heath Irwin (6-5, 250) of Boulder; and Gerald Ancor (6-3,
260) of Marrero, Louisiana.
BTW, the signing date is Feb. 5th.
Joe
|
18.444 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Jan 29 1992 17:05 | 24 |
| > Hey Keith, you wanted to hear about some big offensive linemen
> committing to CU, well here's one for you: Matt Jones, a 6-7 320-pound
> tackle committed to CU yesterday. And his high school coach says he's
> still growing! He's a 2-time all-state player from Bucyrus (Ohio) HS
> and picked CU over Indiana. The Buffs plan to redshirt him and reduce
> his weight to about 300 pounds. He is considered to be a project.
From what you said, it sounds like they got a completely new offensive
line when they signed this one guy. If Matt Jones is 320 lbs and still
growing, he'll probably be slow but it will take the defenders about
15 minutes to run around him. So he's still growing and they want to
redshirt him for a year to get him down to 300. Saying that Jones is a
"project", has to be the understatement of the week.
> Gerald Ancor (6-3, 260) of Marrero, Louisiana.
The CU recruiter's must be well known in Marrero, Louisiana. They've
already got QB's Vance Joseph and Kordell Stewart and FB Kendall Bussey
from Marrero, Louisiana. They are all excellent player's.
Where did you come up with all of this info on the new offensive linemen ?
Thanks for the posting it.
Keith
|
18.445 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 29 1992 18:55 | 20 |
| > If Matt Jones is 320 lbs and still
> growing, he'll probably be slow but
He only runs a 5.5 40, but his first 10 yards are surprisingly quick.
> The CU recruiter's must be well known in Marrero, Louisiana. They've
> already got QB's Vance Joseph and Kordell Stewart and FB Kendall Bussey
> from Marrero, Louisiana. They are all excellent player's.
Do you know what happened to Bussey - did he get redshirted? Also,
have you heard anything about that fullback they recruited from the Miami
area last year? (Can't recall his name right now.)
> Where did you come up with all of this info on the new offensive linemen ?
The Denver Post.
Joe
|
18.446 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Wed Jan 29 1992 19:19 | 23 |
| > He only runs a 5.5 40, but his first 10 yards are surprisingly quick.
That actually sounds pretty fast considering the guy almost weighs
as much as my ex boss.
> Do you know what happened to Bussey - did he get redshirted?
Bussey played a little last year. He even had one or two carries in the
Blockbuster bowl. He probably didn't carry the ball more that 5 or 6
times all year but it probably still counts as a year of eligibility.
> Also, have you heard anything about that fullback they recruited from
> the Miami area last year? (Can't recall his name right now.)
Yes, Kontroy Barber was kicked off the team for a year. He and a couple
of other players used another player's credit card without permission
to buy some sporting goods. I don't think any criminal charges were
made. Mac found out and suspensioned all three. He'll miss spring
practice and all of next year. He was the prize recruit last year and
was redshirted. So, after his suspension, he'll still have 2 years of
eligibility.
Keith
|
18.447 | Still chuckling! | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | You were expecting Elmer Fudd?? | Wed Jan 29 1992 19:34 | 6 |
| Keith -
I don't have any idea who your ex boss is,, but I was absolutely
rolling when I read that line!
JD
|
18.448 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:06 | 11 |
| > made. Mac found out and suspensioned all three. He'll miss spring
> practice and all of next year. He was the prize recruit last year and
> was redshirted. So, after his suspension, he'll still have 2 years of
> eligibility.
I thought I had heard something about him getting in trouble, but
wasn't quite sure. After his suspension, shouldn't he still have 3
years left? (1 redshirt, 1 suspended, 3 more eligible)
Joe
|
18.449 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:34 | 5 |
| You're right Joe, he should have 3 more years to contribute to the team.
So when does spring practice start ?
Keith
|
18.450 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:53 | 7 |
|
> So when does spring practice start ?
First or second week in April, can't remember which.
Joe
|
18.451 | | QUASER::HUNTER | JaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !! | Thu Jan 30 1992 15:00 | 6 |
|
Ol' Uncle Hootsie will be happy to here about the kid from Bucyrus.
Thats his home town and he hates the Buff's... I think I'll call
him and rub his nose in it a bit !!
BG
|
18.452 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Tue Feb 04 1992 17:39 | 14 |
| The Buffs have gotten verbal commitments from the 2 most highly rated
high school linebackers in Colorado. Greg Jones(Kennedy High) is rated
as the top outside linebacker in the nation. He verbally commited in mid
December. Thadus Swazer(Montebello High) is rated as the 19th best outside
linebacker in the nation. He verbally committed yesterday. Both of these
guys were being actively recruited by Nebraska and Miami.
They only have one more slot to fill to complete the 25 scholarship's
allowed this year.
Channel 4 news said that this year may be the best recruiting class that
CU has ever had.
Keith
|
18.453 | bring 'em on !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Feb 06 1992 11:30 | 13 |
| With Colorado beating the awful Billy Tubbs and the Cornhuskers
mainhandling the Cowboys the Big8 has served notice that being
regarded this year's best conference is deserved.
However, the wonderful thing about college hoops is that they'll
get a chance to prove exactly that when March Madness rolls around.
Every team (with the sole exception of the University of North
Carolina Star Heels) will put it all on the line as a conference and
as individual teams to prove themselves by achieving the best possible
meaningless end-of-season peak.
Big10 Tom
|
18.454 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Feb 06 1992 12:35 | 14 |
| Re -1.
You made some good points. ESPN showed an interesting stat a few days
ago. They showed that every team in the Big 8, from first to last, has
a winning record. Now that they are in the middle of the interconference
schedule and bumping each other off, it shows that every team did very
well against non conference teams.
The Cowboys and the Jayhawks meet this weekend. Each team has one loss.
It should be a great game. I think Duke is the best team in the nation
but even though the Cowboys lost, I think they are the 2nd best.
Byron Huston is a stud.
Keith
|
18.455 | Husker Notes, Feb 5th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Feb 06 1992 13:28 | 72 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 5-FEB-1992 22:47:28.47
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Feb 5th
National Letter of Intent Signing Day is usually big news in Lincoln, but
Danny Nee upstaged Osborne by pulling off Nebraska's biggest basketball win
in 10 years, defeating #2 ranked Oklahoma State 85-69. Jamar Johnson had 25
points, a career high, three other Huskers (Hayes-15, Chandler-14,
Piatkowski-10) were in double figures. The turnover prone Huskers committed
only 15 turnovers, well below their season average. Nebraska also had 8
blocked shots to OSU's 3.
Nebraska shot 52%, only the 2nd team to shoot above 50% against the fierce
Oklahoma State defense. (Marquette was the other.) The Cowboys shot
only 38%. Nebraska was also the first team to lead Oklahoma State at
halftime. The Huskers are now 15-4 for the season, 3-3 in the conference,
while Oklahoma State drops to 20-1, 4-1 in the conference. The Cowboys have
to play conference leader Kansas on Saturday.
The sellout crowd (14000+) at the Bob Devaney Sports Center in Lincoln
made so much noise it was difficult to hear the game over the radio, and
poured onto the floor at the end of the game.
The win came on the evening of the 10th anniversary of the biggest win in
Nebraska basketball history, when they defeated #1 Missouri.
Upstated by the basketball team was the football team signings. Tommy Frazier,
considered by many the top option quarterback prospect in the nation, was
expected to sign his national letter of intent to come to Nebraska. The
Huskers also signed another All-American QB, Ben Rutz from Oklahoma.
Frazier, from Bradenton, Florida, had been considering Notre Dame and Clemson,
and almost didn't bother with a recruiting visit to Lincoln, waiting until
the last weekend. Maybe he was influenced by the 65 degree weather, although
the assistant coaches kept coming by saying, "Man! It's cold today!".
Frazier gave as his primary reason for deciding on Nebraska the fact that he
would get to work closely with Tom Osborne, who works with QB's. Since the
Huskers have only one returning QB with experience, 5th year senior Mike Grant,
Osborne gave Frazier his word that he would give him a chance to play.
Frazier has 4.5 speed, and in his final two seasons ran for 1600 yards and
33 touchdowns, while passing for 2600 yards and 30 touchdowns. He
hasn't decided whether he will try to play his freshman year, or red-shirt.
The Nebraska Board of Regents has reaffirmed their decision last summer not
to extend the contract of NU Athletic Director Bob Devaney past January of
1993. The 75 year old former head coach had made a personal request for
a reconsideration of the decision, but has accepted an offer to work with
the university in a fund-raising capacity after his retirement.
Five former Huskers were selected in the WLAF draft in the first 14 rounds:
DL Le Andre Anderson by Birmingham, LB Pat Tyrance by Sacramento, DT Kent
Wells by Ohio, WR Richard Bell by Barcelona, and TE Keith Neubert by Montreal.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Software means never having
Tailored Software Services, Inc. to say you're finished."
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490 --J. D. Hildebrand in UNIX REVIEW
We run mailing lists for Nebraska Cornhuskers and Northwestern Wildcats sports,
and a mailing list gateway for rec.games.chess. Details: [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA28838; Wed, 5 Feb 92 21:48:04 -0800
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14369; Thu, 6 Feb 92 00:00:37 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 5 Feb 92 21:36 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 5 Feb 92 21:36 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Feb 5th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.456 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Feb 06 1992 13:28 | 28 |
| > With Colorado beating the awful Billy Tubbs and the Cornhuskers
> mainhandling the Cowboys the Big8 has served notice that being
> regarded this year's best conference is deserved.
Good to see the conference getting the recognition - Vitale also called
it the best conference last night. Colorado also took KU into OT a
couple weeks ago.
> However, the wonderful thing about college hoops is that they'll
> get a chance to prove exactly that when March Madness rolls around.
I think it was 2 seasons ago when the Big 8 had 3 teams ranked in the
top 5 for much of the season and was also being called the best that
season, only to end up with *ZERO* teams in the Sweet 16.
RE: KU-OSU
If the Jayhawks can beat OSU, they could move into the #1 spot in the
country. However, I believe this game is in Stillwater. If OSU wins,
I would expect Duke to stay #1 in a fairly close vote.
RE: football recruiting
CU's class should be a top-10 one and possible even a top-5 in the
nation. They're saving 1 scholarship WR Mercury Hayes of Houston - he
said he will decide in the next few days between CU, Florida State, and
Michigan. The papers will have plenty of info in the next day or two.
Joe
|
18.457 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Weasels-MakeNoWhineBeforeIt'sTime | Thu Feb 06 1992 15:14 | 5 |
| The Sporting News a few weeks back said that taking the Monday
night late game on ESPN that the Big 10 abandoned was one of the
best things to happen to the Big 8.
/Don
|
18.458 | Football signings | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Free Ivan the terrible | Fri Feb 07 1992 09:36 | 6 |
| USA Today ranked the top 5 teams:
5: Florida
4: Florida St.
3: Colorado
2: Miami
1: Notre "$E#$#%" Dame
|
18.459 | Wasn't Daisy's hoppin'?? | 56699::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Feb 07 1992 09:50 | 7 |
| jealousy will get you nowhere Jeff.
remember, CU sips (and Af too) 8^)
MikeL
Stay away from the GB this PM
|
18.460 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is that a Drake's Coffee Cake? | Fri Feb 07 1992 11:02 | 15 |
| The amazing thing about the 3 FLorida teams in the top 5 is that most
of their recruits are native Floridians.
Miami recruited a defensive lineman that Erickson saw cuz he played
against Erickson's son in H.S. and kilt him!
JD
PS: The Washington Huskies chickened out of a proposed meeting with
Miami in the Meadowlands clash. The players voted no - used academics
as a reason - given that UW has the lowest grad rate for footballers in
the PAC-10, and given other whiney, flimsy excuses, it is painfully
obvious the only reason is cuz they know they'd get their butts
whipped, and expose to the voters the sham they perpetuated on the
legions lasted year...
|
18.461 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Feb 07 1992 13:26 | 10 |
| Re-1 Wash Vs Miami,
I don't see how that game would have any relevance on this past years
teams and rankings. Alot of the starters are gone, so both teams
aren't the same as this past year.
Even if they did play, and lets say Wash did win, they would not have
a right IMO to state they should have been Natl chumps in 91!
Tim
|
18.462 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:20 | 5 |
|
I believe that was your basic *major league chain yank* there
Timothy........
Claybroon
|
18.463 | | DECWET::METZGER | It's not the thing that you fling... | Fri Feb 07 1992 15:33 | 11 |
|
I think the Huskies wimped out of this one as well. They won't have any right
to whine should the same scenario hold place this year as last year.
Of course Miami had no reason to whine this year because they wimped out of
playing anybody decent for their bowl game :-)
Right JD?
Metz
|
18.464 | The Big10 is a weak sister conferce, too... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | U of W Huskies=fraud chickens! | Fri Feb 07 1992 17:54 | 6 |
| Rigth Metz -
Of course, UW wimped out of playing anyone of consequence all year -
right Metz ;-)
JD
|
18.465 | Florida should start their own conference or at least have a state championship tourney | DECWET::METZGER | It's not the thing that you fling... | Fri Feb 07 1992 18:39 | 12 |
|
Yup. That Michigan sure was a poor team. #4 in the country when they played in
the Rose Bowl. Heisman tropy winner. New aerial offense.
Cal and Stanford were some pretty piss poor teams this year also...
I still wish they had the guts to play Miami in the season opener though....
Metz
|
18.466 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | U of W Huskies=fraud chickens! | Fri Feb 07 1992 19:11 | 6 |
| Hey Metz -
This shouldn't be in the Big 8 note. Lets move it to the Pathetic 10
note! ;_)
JD
|
18.467 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Feb 11 1992 12:08 | 33 |
| CU lost a recruiting battle to mighty Michigan for wide receiver
Mercury Hayes of Houston. The Buffs still have a scholarship left to
use.
ESPN's Thursday night schedule this fall will include Big 8 teams three
times:
Sept. 3rd, Oklahoma-Texas Tech
Sept. 24th, California-Kansas
Oct. 8th, Colorado at Missouri
The Buffs finally got a national TV game last night against Iowa State
only to have it pre-empted by the Tyson verdict on ESPN. The Buffs
came back nicely to tie the game at 77 and send it into OT but got
blown away in the OT: final, 96-82.
Big 8 standings thru last night:
Conf. All
Oklahoma State 5-1 21-1
Kansas 5-1 17-2
Missouri 4-2 16-3
Nebraska 3-4 15-5
Iowa State 3-3 17-5
Kansas State 2-4 12-7
Oklahoma 2-5 14-6
Colorado 1-5 10-9
In the latest AP top 25, Oklahoma State is ranked 2nd, Kansas is tied
for 4th, and Missouri is ranked 9th.
Joe
|
18.468 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Tue Feb 11 1992 12:30 | 5 |
| My, isn't it nice to see the awful Billy Tubbs languishing near the
bottom of the conference standings. I'm hoping somebody will run
the score up against them before the year is out.
MrT
|
18.469 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:42 | 3 |
| Every time I see Tubbs, I'm reminded of Jack Nicholson in "The Shining"
Truly gruesome
|
18.470 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Feb 11 1992 21:33 | 5 |
| UMass over Oklahoma by a bundle in early January must have been very
nice for all you Tubbs-haters. Heck, I enjoyed the hell out of it and
I don't even dislike the guy. I'm sort of neutral towards him.
Ninj
|
18.471 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Feb 13 1992 11:51 | 16 |
| The Buffs stunned Oklahoma State last night, 57-53. That leaves KU a
game ahead of OSU and the Cowboys still have to play at Lawrence in a
couple weeks.
As mentioned on ESPN last night, there's a decent chance that *all* 8
teams from the Big 8 will end up in postseason play - I bet that's
never happened.
And yes, CU's home floor is ugly.
McCartney has suspended safety Eric Hamilton for his final year of
eligibility because of a DUI last Friday. CU will now only return 8
starters on defense next year.
Joe
|
18.472 | | JENEVR::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Feb 13 1992 11:58 | 7 |
| re: .471
8 of 9 Big East teams have appeared in postseason, probalby 8 from the
ACC or Big Ten have done that at some point or another.
The Crazy Met
|
18.473 | | DEMING::MCKAY | | Thu Feb 13 1992 12:03 | 8 |
| Just to give him a pat on the back.
Tom Garry correctly predicted that Colorado would
beat Oklahoma State.
Jimbo
|
18.474 | when *I* lived in Boulder they were awful | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Thu Feb 13 1992 15:47 | 4 |
| Somebody better tale the Buffalos they're not that good or there's
gonna be trouble in Big8 land.
MrT
|
18.475 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | big imagination, better than real life | Thu Feb 13 1992 15:49 | 8 |
| >Just to give him a pat on the back.
> Tom Garry correctly predicted that Colorado would
> beat Oklahoma State.
probably predicted it and then bet OSU anyways ;^)
|
18.476 | CU recruits | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Feb 14 1992 15:04 | 38 |
| Here's a list of the CU recruits who have signed their LOI:
Koy Detmer QB 6-1 160 Mission, Texas
Nathan Campbell RB 5-10 185 Alief, Texas
Rashaan Salaam RB 6-2 205 San Diego, Ca.
Rae Carruth WR 6-1 191 Sacremento, Ca.
Shay Davis WR 6-1 170 Green Mtn
James Kidd WR 5-8 160 Sacremento, Ca.
Keenan Gardner TE 6-4 215 Barstow, Ca.
Steve Rosga S-WR 6-2 185 St Paul, Minn
Thadus Swazer LB 6-5 220 Montbello
Gerald Ancar OG 6-4 257 Marerro, La.
Pat Corcoran OG 6-4 277 Bay City, Mich
Heath Irwin OG 6-5 250 Boulder
Matt Jones OT 6-7 320 Bucyrus, Ohio
Matt Lepsis OT 6-4 250 Frisco, Texas
Chris Naeole OT 6-5 295 Kahuka, Hawaii
Shannon Clavelle DT 6-4 268 New Orleans
Maurice Henriques CB 6-1 188 Alief, Texas
Greg Jones OLB 6-5 210 Denver
Jeff Nabholz ILB 6-3 215 St Louis
Matt Russell ILB 6-2 236 Belleville, Ill.
Dalton Simmons DB 6-1 175 Marrero, La.
Kyle Smith DT 6-5 255 Torrington, Wyo.
Deren Tadlock CB 6-1 180 Boulder
Rashaan Salaam went to a $7000/yr private high school where they
played an 8 man/80 yard field. Even with the 80 yard field, his
statistics are staggering. As a junior, he rushed for 2,064 yards
on 118 carries (a 17.5 yard average) and scored 51 TDs. In 25 HS games,
he rushed for 5,050 yards and scored 105 TDs. The word is, that if
he played on a 100 yard field, he would have gained another 1000 yards.
He's been described by the rating services as a tremendous talent.
If he turns out to be as good as his press clippings, I expect to
see Lamont Warren(who holds the CU freshman rushing records) to be
moved to wide receiver.
Keith
|
18.477 | Top Conference in America? Possibly. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Thu Feb 20 1992 09:19 | 9 |
| What, no mention of the *unbelievable* results of last nights hoops
action?! As I recall, four (4) Big 8 games took place last night, each
of which resulted in a ranked team getting beaten!
Watch out for these teams come tourney time - they've certainly been
battle-tested.
- ACC Chris
|
18.478 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Feb 20 1992 10:13 | 41 |
| -< Top Conference in America? Possibly. >-
No, definitely the best conference in America. :^)
Last night in the Big 8 was a microcosm of what has been happening in
college basketball this season: When a ranked team goes on the road in
the conference, anything can happen.
For the third straight Wednesday, CU upset a ranked opponent at home,
beating Missouri 77-60. If CU only would've knocked off KU at home a
few weeks ago they'd have a good shot at the Big Dance. As it stands
now, they remain a longshot but will probably get into the NIT. Pretty
good for a rebuilding year.
Nebraska beat KU in OT, 81-79. I switched over to this one just as it
went into OT, but then my wife came back in the room and she made me
turn back to the stupid figure skating. :^( KU's Adonis (sp) Jordan
had a layup attempt blocked as time ran out in regulation.
Oklahoma beat Oklahoma State at Stillwater to end OSU's 28-game home
winning streak. OSU has now lost 3 in a row and 4 of their last 5.
K-State beat Iowa State, 64-55. I just noticed that ISU is ranked
23rd, so ACC Chris is right, the 4 ranked teams in the conference lost.
Standings
Conf. All
Kansas 7-2 19-3
Missouri 6-3 18-4
Oklahoma St. 5-4 21-4
Iowa State 4-5 18-7
Nebraska 4-5 16-6
Oklahoma 4-5 16-6
Kansas St. 3-6 13-9
Colorado 3-6 12-10
Joe
|
18.479 | Now where have I seen that before??????? | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Feb 20 1992 10:16 | 12 |
| Joe,
Your note strongly looks like a deja-vu of the Big East!
COPYCAT!!!!!!!!
;^)
Kev
|
18.480 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Thu Feb 20 1992 11:14 | 11 |
|
Actually Joe, it was Alonzo Jamieson who had his shot blocked at the end of
regulation. Why he was jamming the dam thing I'll never know. By going for the
layup he allowed the Nebraska player to get back into the play as he was ahead
of the field. Of course being a NUKEWIDEBODYSTUD(TM) his dribbling wasn't the
greatest which also allowed the NU player to get back into the play.
Horrible game at the foul line for both teams. If they think they're going
far in the tourney, they won't if they shoot like that.
mike
|
18.481 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 24 1992 11:54 | 31 |
| Oklahoma State continued their dive by losing to Missouri yesterday -
the Cowboys' 4th straight loss and 5th in their last 6 games. Byron
Houston didn't play for OSU, but neither did Anthony Peeler of
Missouri.
Saturday:
Colorado lost at Oklahoma as expected, 99-83.
Kansas needed a last-second shot to beat K-State, 54-52.
Nebraska, in somewhat of a surprise, won at Iowa State 80-70. It was
ISU's first home loss this season and Nebraska's 2nd-straight win over
a ranked team.
I think Nebraska and Oklahoma have just about sealed up tournament
bids. Oklahoma could all but wrap up a bid by winning at Kansas
tonight, but that's a tough task. Iowa State may be back on the
bubble, but if they can knock off Missouri tomorrow night, the Cyclones
should be in.
Kansas State and CU are the only teams in the conference with little
chance of making the tournament, but both teams will probably make the
NIT. These teams need to get a hot streak going or win the Big 8
tournament
If Kansas doens't falter too much the rest of the way they should get
a #1 seed in one of the regions.
Joe
|
18.482 | | COMET2::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Feb 24 1992 16:51 | 1 |
| Didn't OSUs slide start with a loss to colorado?
|
18.483 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 24 1992 17:52 | 5 |
| > Didn't OSUs slide start with a loss to colorado?
No, CU was their 2nd loss. Their first loss was to Nebraska.
Joe
|
18.484 | Husker Notes are BACK!!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Feb 26 1992 14:58 | 54 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 26-FEB-1992 10:52:31.47
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Feb 26th
First the good news: The Huskers are ranked 25th in the AP College Basketball
poll this week. Danny Nee had said back in early January that he didn't want
to be rated before Feb 15th but did want to be rated by the end of Feb.,
because THAT'S when it matters. (It will affect seeding into the NCAA
tournament.)
The Big Eight Conference is the only one in the nation with EVERY team having
a record above .500, leading to speculation in the press that the Big Eight
could indeed place six teams in the NCAA tournament. The Omaha World-Herald
suggests that Nebraska might be placed in the Southeast Regional field.
Now the bad news: The Huskers have to travel to Stillwater to play Oklahoma
State tonight. Aside from the fact that road games are tougher than home
games, OSU's home court is very friendly to them, and they are probably hot
for revenge for two weeks ago's first loss of the season at the hands of
the Huskers (which started a 1-5 skid for OSU), Nee has suspended Carl Hayes
for one game because of a minor disciplinary infraction. And All-American
forward Byron Houston's ankle injury, which kept him out of the Missouri game,
is healing and he is listed as 'probable'. (At least the game isn't on ESPN!)
Tom Osborne has permanently suspended two players and placed several others on
indefinite suspension due to a brawl with members of the NU baseball team
during a house party on Saturday. Although Osborne didn't release the
names, the Lincoln Star says that WR Jeffrey Hughes and LB Brian Havens
are the ones permanently suspended. Others also ticketed by the police on
suspicion of misdemeanor offenses were DT Terry Connealy, QB Todd
Gragano, OL Zach Wieert, and LB Lance Gray. Also ticketed was former NU OL
Raymone Reifenrath. They are scheduled to appear in Lancaster County
Court around March 11th. None of the members of the baseball team, which
reports say may have started the fight, have been disciplined yet, and
apparently none were ticketed by the police. The dispute may have started
when several of the baseball players tried to get two football players to
leave because they wouldn't pay a cover charge for beer at the party.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "This .sig infected by the .sig virus.
Tailored Software Services, Inc. Copy it into your .sig today!"
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA25890; Wed, 26 Feb 92 09:51:27 -0800
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA28168; Wed, 26 Feb 92 12:42:02 -0500
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 26 Feb 92 11:03:28 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03689; Wed, 26 Feb 92 11:07:08 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 Feb 92 09:30 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 26 Feb 92 09:30 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Feb 26th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.485 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Feb 26 1992 17:29 | 9 |
| I saw in yesterday's Rocky Mtn News that Buffalo Defensive Back Deon Figures
was arrested for DUI. There's been no word yet on what deciplinary actions
will be taken by Mac but it will probably be a one year suspension or he'll
be kicked off the team permanently. Many people felt that Figures would
be one of the premier defensive backs in the nation for the upcoming
season. This is the 2nd time this month that a CU defensive back has been
arrested for DUI.
Keith
|
18.486 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Feb 26 1992 18:16 | 6 |
| Mac hasn't said anything about Figures yet because he's out of town. I
don't see any reason to believe that Figures won't be kicked off the
team. He was also suspended for the '89 season for disciplinary
reasons.
Joe
|
18.487 | Wednesday magic is gone | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Feb 27 1992 10:03 | 7 |
| Colorado's chances of making the NCAA tournament went out the window
with a 74-66 home loss to Kanasas State. CU is now 12-12 overall and
needs to finish at .500 or better to meet NIT qualifications. Chances
are they'll finish below .500 because 2 or their last 3 are on the
road.
Joe
|
18.488 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:49 | 26 |
| Conf. All
Kansas 10-2 22-3
Missouri 8-4 20-5
Oklahoma St. 6-6 22-6
Nebraska 6-6 18-7
Oklahoma 6-6 18-7
Kansas St. 5-7 15-10
Iowa St. 4-8 18-10
Colorado 3-9 12-13
Tonight:
Colorado at OSU
Kansas at Iowa St.
Kansas St. at Nebraska
Oklahoma at Missouri
NCAA Tourney:
Oklahoma St., Kansas, and Missouri will get in. Nebraska and Oklahoma
are all but in. If they take a 6th team from the Big 8, it will
probably be Iowa State, but Kansas State has been hot lately. If ISU
knocks off KU tonight, it'll be hard to leave them out.
Joe
|
18.489 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Mar 06 1992 12:08 | 11 |
| Deon Figures will be suspended for the opener against CSU due to his
recent drunk driving arrest.
Read where Nebraska home football tickets will rise from $18.50 to $20
this fall, except for the CU game which will be $28.
Still not a rivalry though.
Joe
|
18.490 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:13 | 21 |
| > Deon Figures will be suspended for the opener against CSU due to his
> recent drunk driving arrest.
I'm surprised Figures wasn't kicked off the team. He was arrested
for DUI and not DWI. There is a difference. Do you have any more
information on why he was only suspended for one game while
Eric Hamilton who was also arrested for either DWI or DUI was suspended
for one year ?
Keith
> Read where Nebraska home football tickets will rise from $18.50 to $20
> this fall, except for the CU game which will be $28.
Yep, to the Husker's, it's just like playing Kansas State or Iowa State.
Just another game.
(which they haven't won in over three years)
Keith
|
18.491 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Mar 06 1992 17:09 | 19 |
|
> I'm surprised Figures wasn't kicked off the team. He was arrested
> for DUI and not DWI. There is a difference. Do you have any more
> information on why he was only suspended for one game while
> Eric Hamilton who was also arrested for either DWI or DUI was suspended
> for one year ?
Hamilton's DUI was his 2nd.
> Yep, to the Husker's, it's just like playing Kansas State or Iowa State.
> Just another game.
>
> (which they haven't won in over three years)
I thought Nebraska won last year? :^)
Joe
|
18.492 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Mar 06 1992 17:54 | 6 |
| Joe, I think 'Braska and CU tied. Isn't that why they tied for the
Big 8? Or was it CU lost to Neb. and Neb lost to OU?
Volatle memory I guess.....
Tim
|
18.493 | It was a joke, Tim | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Mar 06 1992 18:01 | 1 |
|
|
18.494 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Mar 06 1992 18:44 | 4 |
| Yea, but a tie with CU is a moral victory for the Husker's so I quess
Joe was right a few replays back.
Keith
|
18.495 | How trivial... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:18 | 12 |
| CU AND OU are $28.00 at Nebraska when they are a home game. Hey, this is
America - make a buck when you can you know.
What the admin charges for tickets in no way reflects how the team looks at
the game. I bet OU and CU charge more for NU tickets as well.
Just because Johny Mitchell makes a statement (and he IS the one who said it)
you CU folks (I wanted to insert a different word there) think it gives you
license to talk sh$t about the whole NU team and program. Give it a rest.
Marty Moose
|
18.496 | Husker Notes, March 10th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:19 | 57 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 10-MAR-1992 22:19:36.79
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, March 10th
I got the following story from the radio, I hope I didn't mess up any details:
Oklahoma lodged a protest with the Big Eight over their fourth place seed in
the Big Eight Basketball tournament this weekend. (Which matched them up
against Nebraska in round 1.) It seems that there was a procedural error
in the calculation of the tie-breaks and that Oklahoma and Missouri were
actually tied for 3rd place.
So, during a conference call of the athletic directors of the Big Eight,
it was decided to hold a random drawing to see who got the 3rd place seed,
and who got the 4th place. (3rd place plays Iowa State in round 1.)
In what can only be described as poetic justice, Missouri 'won' the drawing
and retains the 3rd place seed. So, OU-NU-III is on for Friday at about noon.
The local sentiment in Lincoln is that this could well backfire against the
Sooners.
Iowa State coach Johnny Orr and Oklahoma coach Billy Tubs feel that the
Big Eight postseason tournament has outlived its purpose, which was to
increase the number of Big Eight teams that get into the NCAA tournament.
The Cyclones, who have a 19-11 record but were only 5-9 in the conference,
feel that a loss in the first round (against Missouri, see above) may well
eliminate them from consideration by the NCAA. (There have been some reports
that the NCAA Selection Committee might frown on taking teams with a less than
.500 record in their conference.) Danny Nee likes the tournament, for the
exposure it gives the conference, the experience in tournament conditions
it gives the players, and the money it brings in.
NU has finally finished their investigation of the Omar Soto eligibility
situation. (Soto appeared in a scrimmage or two at a California JC before
enrolling in another JC and thus used up a year of eligibility under NCAA
guidelines, but not under Junior College guidelines.) NU will probably ask
the Big Eight to waive the automatic forfeiture of two conference games in
which Soto appeared, and will offer to reduce the number of scholarships
by one next season. Based on previous similar cases, the Big Eight will
probably go along with NU's requests.
---
Michael Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA07936; Tue, 10 Mar 92 21:18:55 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Tue, 10 Mar 92 23:14:58 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA24657; Tue, 10 Mar 92 23:21:10 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Mar 92 23:05 CS
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 10 Mar 92 23:05 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, March 10th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.497 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:04 | 18 |
| > I bet OU and CU charge more for NU tickets as well.
I'm sure they do, too. Because that's their biggest home game of the
season (if they happen to be playing NU at home that particular year).
> Just because Johny Mitchell makes a statement (and he IS the one who said it)
> you CU folks (I wanted to insert a different word there) think it gives you
> license to talk sh$t about the whole NU team and program. Give it a rest.
Mitchell isn't the only who said it - Osborne said it and still says
it. I don't see where pointing out that NU is charging more for
tickets is talking shit about the whole NU team and program. I was
pointing out that by charging more for the CU game that NU is saying
it's now without a doubt their biggest home game whether Osborne or
Mitchell or anyone else wants to admit it.
Joe
|
18.498 | Final Standings, All-conference team | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:11 | 21 |
| Conf. All
Kansas 11-3 23-4
Oklahoma St. 8-6 24-6
Missouri 8-6 20-7
Oklahoma 8-6 20-7
Nebraska 7-7 19-8
Iowa St. 5-9 19-11
Kansas St. 5-9 15-12
Colorado 4-10 13-14
AP All-Big Eight Team:
Anthony Peeler, Missouri, Senior
Byron Houston, Oklahoma State, Senior
Rex Walters, Kansas, Junior
Brent Price, Oklahoma, Senior
Adonis Jordan, Kansas, Junior
Joe
|
18.499 | Scary bunch | SCNDRL::HUNT | Three little birds sit by my doorstep ... | Wed Mar 11 1992 12:17 | 12 |
| � Kansas 11-3 23-4
� Oklahoma St. 8-6 24-6
� Missouri 8-6 20-7
� Oklahoma 8-6 20-7
� Nebraska 7-7 19-8
These guys will make serious noise in the NCAA Tournament. Roy Williams is
downright scary as a coach. All the best of Dean Smith's system plus the
willingness and intelligence to adapt it on-the-fly to playing conditions.
Shudder ...
Bob Hunt
|
18.500 | Bit-8 Final Standing & Tournament Schedule | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Mar 11 1992 16:27 | 37 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Scott Davis" 11-MAR-1992 14:06:55.76
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Big8 schedule
conf overall
KU 11-3 23-4
OSU 8-6 24-6
MU 8-6 20-7
OU 8-6 20-7
NU 7-7 19-8
ISU 5-9 19-11
KSU 5-9 15-12
CU 4-10 13-14
Times/dates are subject to change without my approval.
Mar13 Big Eight Tournament(rayc)
12:10 OU-NU, 2:20 KU-CU, 6:10 OSU-KSU, 8:20 MU-ISU
Mar14 Big Eight Tournament(rayc)
1:10(winners of 1st 2 games) & 3:20(winners of last 2 games)
Mar15 Big Eight Championship(rayc)
[2:10]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA01531; Wed, 11 Mar 92 13:06:04 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 11 Mar 92 15:02:06 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA28415; Wed, 11 Mar 92 15:08:26 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2) id <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Mar 92 09:16 CS
% Date: Wed, 11 Mar 92 08:36:39 CST
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% From: "Scott Davis" <[email protected]>
% Subject: Big8 schedule
% To: [email protected]
% X-Vms-Mail-To: UUCP%"[email protected]"
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.501 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Mar 11 1992 16:29 | 9 |
| Joe, anyting that Osborne says is so stinking conservative that I don't even
listen to it. I think he said that so his players would not get too high or
psyched out over a big game. I think he has a degree in human psychology.
Any you won't have to worry about Mitchell and his mouth (or his NFL quality
talent) anymore - He's placed himself NFL draft eligable and will not be
wearing Husker Red next year.
Marty Moose
|
18.502 | It looks bad... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Mar 11 1992 16:35 | 20 |
| Oh, forgot - word from Huskerland is that Osborne is pretty content with things
as they are in terms of the style of ball NU plays. That dosent mean he's
happy with getting creamed by Miami in the Orange Bowl. What he said was that
he thinks the NU program will be ok as it is - they just need to work harder.
NOT !!! IMHO
With CU and OU seeing the light and initiating the passing game - I think
that it won't matter how much talent NU has - they can't beat good passing
teams with the present NU system - PERIOD! And they won't be able to recurit
the super athlets untill they change their ways from boreing to passing.
I look for OU and CU to beat them if Osborne does not wake up. The only hope
for us NU Husker faithfull is that Devaney is going to retire as NU AD after
the '92 season. PLEASE Dr. Tom - take the AD job and hire a young, flexible
pass minded coach and bring the Huskers back to where they belong again-
ON TOP !!!!
Nebraska Marty Moose
|
18.503 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Mar 13 1992 11:32 | 26 |
| With the Big 8 tournament starting this morning, the Jayhawks could be
starting a string that would see them play 5 of their next 7 games at
Kemper Arena in KC. KU (if they reach the Big 8 title game) will play
their next 3 games at Kemper, site of the Big 8 tourney. And if they
win the Big 8 tourney, KU would probably the the #1 seed in the
Midwest, where they could be playing 2 regional games in Kemper if they
survive the first 2 rounds of the NCAA's.
Guess I'll give a fearless Big 8 tournament prediction:
Today:
KU over CU
OU over NU
OSU over KSU
Mizzou over ISU
Semi's:
OU over KU
OSU over Mizzou
Final:
OSU over OU
Joe
|
18.504 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Mar 16 1992 11:53 | 13 |
| The Big Eight got their 6 teams in the tourney, with Iowa State
securing that 6 bid with their opening-round upset of Missouri in the
Big 8 tourney. Not only did the Big 8 send more teams than any other
conference, they're the smallest of the major conferences with only 8
members.
Kansas State is in the NIT.
ISU coach Johnny Orr sure is a character. He had me rollin' on ESPN's
selection show yesterday.
Joe
|
18.505 | *** Roy stays!! *** | MAIL::MCNIEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:46 | 18 |
| Big 8 ters,
Been a while since I've noted. (I remember slammin' ACC Chris in '90)
Final 4 predictions:
Kansas
Oklahoma St.
Mass U.
Louisville
Regards,
Kansas Comet
|
18.506 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Mar 23 1992 17:54 | 26 |
| Well, it's almost like two years ago for the Big 8 teams in the NCAA
tournament.
1990: - 3 teams ranked in top 5 for much of regular season
- 4 or 5 teams go dancing
- ZERO made the Sweet 16 (OU was a #1 seed, KU was a 2 or 3 seed)
1992: - 3 teams ranked in top 10 for much of season and as many as 5
ranked at one time.
- 6 teams go dancing.
- Only 1 team makes the Sweet 16
The only team that has acquitted itself nicely is Iowa State, with the
jury still out on Oklahoma State. Nebraska and Missouri only slightly
underachieved, not necessarily because they lost (they both lost in
games that were considered fairly even according to seedings) but how
bad they lost. Kansas and OU underachieved big-time. Anything less
than the Final 4 would've been a disappointment for KU, considering
they were in the weak Midwest and would've played at Kemper in the
Regionals.
Kansas State won their first NIT game and plays at Notre Dame in the 2nd
round tonight.
Joe
|
18.507 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 24 1992 08:44 | 8 |
|
This year's performance in the NCAAs once again reinforced why I can't
get into Oklahoma basketball while Billy Tubbs is still around. The
1988 Finals took the wind out of my sails and it hasn't (and won't)
return. Oklahoma just plays dumb, like their coach...
glenn
|
18.508 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 09:20 | 6 |
| Billy Tubbs is negotiating today with a unnamed NBA team.
Steve Fisher of Michigan has unequivocally stated that if the
Sooners job opens up he'll take it.
MrT
|
18.509 | If it happens, good riddance | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 24 1992 09:27 | 15 |
|
> Billy Tubbs is negotiating today with a unnamed NBA team.
Is this a joke? I can see why the team might want to remain unnamed
(then again, someone hired Paul Westhead, didn't they?).
> Steve Fisher of Michigan has unequivocally stated that if the
> Sooners job opens up he'll take it.
Fisher may not be able to coach, but at least he's not a horse's butt
to boot like Tubbs. A definite improvement, as far as I'm concerned.
Why would he want to leave Michigan for Oklahoma, though? Job security?
glenn
|
18.510 | SUCKERRRRR !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 09:31 | 1 |
|
|
18.511 | Knew it was too good to be true... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 24 1992 09:43 | 1 |
|
|
18.512 | least you have oodles a talent... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:42 | 1 |
|
|
18.513 | Husker Notes, March 30, 1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Mar 30 1992 15:28 | 36 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 30-MAR-1992 12:18:36.26
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, March 30, 1992
Spring practice begins today for Tom Osborne's football squad. Paramount is
the question 'Who will replace Keithen McCant at quarterback?' Osborne has
also stated he intends to have a 'dominant defense' in 1992.
Five All-Big Eight offensive players from the '91 squad are gone: McCant,
sophomore tight end Johnny Mitchell, who turned pro and is awaiting the NFL
draft, split end Jon Bostick, guard Erik Wiegert, and tackle Brian Boerboom.
Coincidentally, the process to replace Bob Devaney as Athletic Director
also begins today. A nationwide search is to be launched, according to
UNL Chancellor Graham Spanier. Inside candidates have not been ruled out
either. Devaney retires on January 1, 1993, his replacement may not be
named for at least four months.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Freedom of the press is still alive in
Tailored Software Services, Inc. America, at the U. S. Mint" (Gallagher)
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490
We run mailing lists for Nebraska Cornhuskers and Northwestern Wildcats sports,
and a mailing list gateway for rec.games.chess. Details: [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA20065; Mon, 30 Mar 92 11:17:11 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Mon, 30 Mar 92 13:13:08 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA26931; Mon, 30 Mar 92 13:19:47 CST
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2)id <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Mar 92 12:17 CST
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Mon, 30 Mar 92 12:17 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, March 30, 1992
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.514 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Mar 30 1992 15:32 | 17 |
| re: -1
As you noters know - I'm a born and never say die Husker fan - but I have
this to say about .-1:
HOGWASH - NU will not have a "dominating" defense untill they recruit DB's
of a high caliber AND "get a passing life" of their own so those DB's can
practice againse a competent passing game day in and day out.
Osborne will start some Sot who can run the option game but is a medium
quality passer/field general - thus the Huskers will stay at their level
of mediocrity.
OU and CU are converting to the passing game. All I have to say is watch
out Huskers.
Nebraska Marty
|
18.515 | Husker Notes, April 1, 1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Apr 01 1992 13:02 | 34 |
| From: DECPA::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 1-APR-1992 09:54:29.18
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, April 1, 1992
UNL Chancellor Graham Spanier made it clear on Monday that Tom Osborne
will not be able to serve as head football coach and athletic director,
although Osborne continues to deny he is interested in becoming AD.
Citing the over $30 million budget of the NU Athletic Department, Spanier
says NU needs a full-time AD, not a part-time AD, part-time coach.
But, Omaha World-Herald columnist Tom Shatel continues to push Osborne
for the job, although he admits Tom would have to do a better job of delegating
responsibility than he has done as football coach.
A 10-person search committee has been named to search for a replacement for
Bob Devaney. Osborne isn't on the search committee, either.
---
Michael Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA14886; Wed, 1 Apr 92 08:53:03 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 1 Apr 92 10:47:57 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA04788; Wed, 1 Apr 92 10:54:14 CST
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2)id <[email protected]>; Wed, 1 Apr 92 10:39 CST
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 1 Apr 92 10:39 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, April 1, 1992
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.516 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:46 | 13 |
| CU had their first scrimmage of spring ball on Saturday and the new passing
offense got off to a slow start. Vance Joseph grabbed the early lead on the
race for the starting QB position completing 6 of 16 for 152 yards and 2 TD's.
Kordell Stewart completed 5 of 10 for 50 yards and Duke Tobin completed
2 of 5 for 48 yards. On the receiving end, Michael Westbrook caught an
11-yard TD pass and Erik Mitchell had one of 80 yards.
The running game only managed 111 yards on 39 carries and the QB's were
running for their lives much of the afternoon, so the line continues
to be the big weak link on offense.
Joe
|
18.517 | Husker Notes, April 16th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Apr 16 1992 12:37 | 109 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 16-APR-1992 00:20:07.31
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, April 16th
Notes from Spring Practice:
The annual Red-White Spring game will be free this year, with contributions
requested to help Gina Simanek, the Lincoln artist who was beaten last
January, allegedly by NU I-back Scott Baldwin. $15,000 is expected to
be raised as a result. Baldwin is scheduled to stand trial in June on two
felony assault charges. He has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity
to both charges.
Freshman Tony Veland is giving senior Mike Grant a run for the # 1
quarterback slot. Grant was held out of practice on Tuesday because of
an injury, as were DT Terry Connealy and MG David Noonan. CB Kenny Wilhite
and WB Jamie Weyers, both recovering from knee surgery last fall, are
taking part in some contact drills. IBs Derek Brown and Calvin Jones
and WB Abdul Muhammad were held out of practice this week for academic
reasons.
Depth Chart:
Split End: Tyrone Hughes, Corey Dixon, Duane Wiles, Truman Bell,
Darin Duin, Merritt Nelson
Left Tackle: Lance Lundberg, Dave Jensen, Joel Gesky, Doug Woddell,
Silas Cleveland, Mark Brown
Left Guard: Ken Mehlin, Chris Zyzda, Brenden Stai, Wayne Meylan,
Bryan Pruitt
Center: Jim Scott, Terris Chorney, Brad Mundt, Aaron Graham, Jon Pedersen
Right Guard: Will Shields, Joel Wilks, Steve Ott, Jason Licht, Steve Volin
Right Tackle: Rob Zatechka-Zach Wiegert, Brad Casky, Shyuan Jasper,
Robert Smith
Tight End: William Washington, Mike Vedral-Gerald Armstrong, Matt Show,
Mark Gilman, Erich Hohl, Jacques Allen
Quarterback: Tony Veland, Matt Jones, Brook Berringer, Todd Gragano,
Joel Cornwell, John McMillen
Fullback: Lance Lewis, Andre McDuffy, Cory Schlesinger, David Fiala,
Rod Haarberg, Rick Blatny, Chris Norris, Chad Stanley
I-Back: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, Damon Schmadeke, Jeff Makovicka,
Allen Pommier, Jason Fisher
Wingback: Vincent Hawking, Abdul Muhammad, Tom Werner, Brett Poppelweil,
David Seizys, Eric Scheppers, Darren Schmadeke
Kicker: Byron Bennett, Tom Sieler, Kevin McMindes, Jeff Lang, Jeremy Jensen
Left Outside LB: Travis Hill, Davie Leader, Greg Fletcher, Todd Heyne,
Clint Brown, Dean Schneider
Left Tackle: John Parreila, Matt Hillman, Terry Connealy, Jason Pesterfield
Middle Guard: David Noonan, Bill Humphrey, Bart Furrown, Jerry Irons,
Ryan Barry
Right Tackle: Jamie Liewer, Bruce Moore, Billy Wade, Luther Hardin
Right Outside LB: David White-Trev Alberts, Danta Jones, Jerad Higman,
Torry Garland, Ken Bello, Mike Dickmeyer
Strongside LB: Mike Anderson, Daren Williams, Troy Branch, Phil Ellis,
Jim Prevette, John Martin, Ryan Murtaugh
Weakside LB: Ed Stewart, Doug Colman, Matt Penland, Leroi Jones,
Adam Schultze, Aaron Penland
Left Cornerback: Kenny Wilhite, John Reece, Brady Mercer, Anthony Cole,
Ralph Lott
Right Cornerback: Lorenzo Brinkley, Mike Heins, Marcus Anderson,
Saluhu Issaka, Clester Johnson
Monsterback: Steve Carmer, Austin Wertz, Zeke Cisco, John Simdorn,
Travis Giesbrecht
Free Safety: Tyrone Byrd, Troy Dumas, Charles Green, Sedric Collins,
Jay Herman, Chad Young
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett, Jeff Lang, Chris Borland
Injured: Darius Williams, Kevin Raemakers, T. J. Slansky, Robert Hughes,
Lance Gray, Jeff Solich, Tom Steer, Mike Grant, Don O'Neill,
Ernie Beler, Dennis Martin, Curt Brengelman, Chris Grass, Kyle Emsick,
Matt Orduna
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA23765; Wed, 15 Apr 92 23:19:43 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Thu, 16 Apr 92 01:13:33 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA23101; Thu, 16 Apr 92 01:19:21 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2)id <[email protected]>; Thu, 16 Apr 92 01:11 CDT
% Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 00:32:05 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Message-Id: <9204160532.AA22611@helios>
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, April 16th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.518 | Info about Husker Football Recruits... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Sun Apr 19 1992 22:41 | 151 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Andy Knipp Metro SE" 17-APR-1992 20:03:09.26
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: 1992 recruits
Here is a shorted version of the Huskers Illustrated article
on the recruits signed by Nebraska. But first, I will give the
article on Tony Vreland, possible startin QB, as a red-shirt
freshman:
Tony Vreland: 6-2, 185, QB, Omaha
Vreland has 4.55 speed, a 275 lb bench press, and a 26 on the
ACT. He was considered the 20th best prospect (of all positions)
in the Midwest last year. No passing/rushing totals were given
however, Vreland was 2nd team All state at QB, he also was the
bestt DB & punter on the team.
This year Neb. listed 26 players as scholarship recruits,
since they are only allowed to have 25, I assume that, since
some are on the bubble SAT-wise, Coach Osborne was hedging his
bets.
FIrst there are 4 players who did not make the ACT/SAT last year
and were Prop 42 victims. If they make the grades this year,
they will have 4 years to complete 3 years of eligability. THey
are:
Christan Peter, 6'2", 312lb, DL, 4.8 forty, 450 lb bench from
Middleton NJ. Peter signed last year, made the SAT, however,
due to a transfer in HS, his core requirements didn't make it.
Dwayne Harrism 6'3", 240lb, OLB frin Bessemer Alabama. Harris
was a USA Today HS All American last year.
Barron Miles, 5-10, 170, Athelete (QB, WB, SE, CB), from Roselle NJ.
Charles Randolf, 6'2", 268, TE from New Orleans. Signed with
Florida State, didn't make it. His chances of making the ACT/SAT
are not good.
The 1992 recruits are:
Larry Arnold, 6'4", 215, LB, 4.6 (forty), 310 (lb bench), from
Copley OH. Arnold runs a 11 sec 100 meter, also state qualifier
in swimming. Very highly recruited LB.
Damon Benning, 5'11", 187, RB/WB, 4.5, 255, from Omaha. Benning led
Neb in rushing, with 1548 yards. Rated as one of the top WB
recruits in the country.
Willis Brown, 5'9", 165, WB/CB/RB, 4.4, 280, from Edmond OK. Brown
was not highly recruited, however, he has a 10.5 100 meter dash &
could grow into an excellent CB or WB.
Clinton Childs, 6'0", 195, RB, 4.5 300, from Omaha. Childs was a top 20
RB in the country. Finished #2 in the state with 1495 yards rushing. Blue
Chip All American.
Chris Dishman, 6'4", 273, OL, 5.1, 345, from Cozad Neb. 2 time All
State, Blue Chip All American.
Tommie Frazier, 6'0", 195, QB, 4.5, 275, from Manatee FL. USA Today
first team All American QB. Top recruit for the Cornhuskers. In 2
years starting, he threw for 2600 yards, 30 TDs, and rushed for 1600
yards & 33 TDs.
Jon Hesse, 6'4", 205, LB, 4.7, 265, from Lincoln. Academic All State (2
times) and All State (1). Could play a lot of positions, after he
puts some weight on.
Mike Minter, 5'10", 175, RB/DB, 4.5, 260, from Lawton OK. Tough hitter
that averaged 8.5 yards/carry as a RB. WIll probably play FS, considered
the hardest hitter in the state at DB.
Ed Morrow, 6'4", 225, ILB, 4.65, 260, Florisant MO. Morrow was a
highly recruited player with 60 tackles despite having orthoscopic
knee surgery done mid-season.
Kareem Moss, 6-5, 200, CB, 4.5, 315, Garden City CC, KS. Moss was a
Junior College All Am, great speed & 3 years eligible. Runs a 10.5
100 meter dash.
Jeff Ogard, 6'6", 275, OT, 5.0, 340 from St Paul Neb. Very highly
recruited player, HS ran 70% of the offense his way.
Ben Rutz, 6'0", 185, QB, 4.7, 255, Oklahoma City. Top 20 rated
QB, threw for 4400 yards in 3 years starting. Completed 54%
of his passes in HS.
Scott Saltsman, 6'2", 260, NG, 4.9, 355, Wichita Falls TX. Top 5 rated
NG in the country. Had 85 tackles, 11 sacks, caused 6 fumbles.
TJ Scribner, 6-3, 215, LB, 4.7, 310, from Omaha. Could also play
TE/FB, played 8 man football, not highly recruited.
Marvin Sims, 5"8, 185, RB, 4.5, 315 from Apple Vally, MN. Parade
All American, top 2 RB, #2 in the state 100 meter dash (10.8), twice
All State.
Jim Stiebel, 6'4", 240, OG, 4.8, 320 from Belleville IL. USA Today
2nd team. BLue CHip/Super Prep All AM. HS, Althoff Catholic,
one of the top FB programs in IL.
Eric Stokes, 5'10", 177, CB, 4.5, 300, from Lincoln. Super Prep
All American CB, rushed for 1200 yards as a sr. Top 5 recruit at
CB, in the country.
Ryan Terwilliger, 6'5", 215, LB/TE, 4.6, 270, from Grant Neb. National
Honor Society, 1st team All State, Def. Captain. Could play either
postition well.
Larry Townsend, 6'5", 270, DT, 4.8, 415, from San Jose. Super
Prep Far West Def. Player of the Year. #1 DT rated by Emfinger.
Twice All State in CA. 65 tackles, 11 sacks, also has a 29 inch
vertical leap.
Leonard Washington, 6'3", 270, DT, 4.9, 335, from Omaha. Grades
are questionable, Nebraska Player of the Year. DL of the year
twice. Not highly recruited due to grades & 2 successful knee
surgeries.
Riley Washington, 5-10, 160, WB/SE/CB, 4.4, 255, San Diego CA.
Has a 10.4 100 meter, rated one of the top WB recruits. Rushed
for 2300 yards in 2 years.
Toby Wright, 6'0", 180, S, 4.5, 280, Phoenix JC. All American JC,
graduated & is enrolled & playing in spring practice. Has 3 years
to play 2.
Andy Knipp SE |
Sun Microsystems | The secret of success is sincerity,
Schaumburg, IL | once you can fake that, you have it made.
[email protected] |
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA11370; Fri, 17 Apr 92 19:02:39 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Fri, 17 Apr 92 20:54:57 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA04164; Fri, 17 Apr 92 21:00:43 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.22.1 #22.2)id <[email protected]>; Fri, 17 Apr 92 20:42 CDT
% Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 19:31:33 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Andy Knipp Metro SE)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: 1992 recruits
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.519 | Buff news | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Apr 20 1992 16:05 | 24 |
| The Buffs had another spring practice scrimmage on Sat. Even though they
have converted to a 1 running back offense, they ran out of running backs.
Lamont Warren has been held out of all contact drills because of off season
surgery. Scott Phillips went down with an injured knee and Kendal Bussey
went down with a shoulder injury. Bussey will need surgery and will miss
all of the 92 season. Converted cornerback, Derek Agnew, played running
back but he also went down with a fractured collarbone. That left James
Hill as the only healthy running back. He played on both the 1st string
offense and 3rd string offense.
Vance Joseph and Kordell Stewart alternately directed the 1st string offense.
They accounted for 2 TD's and a field goal. Joseph(7 of 16 for 75 yds) ran
16 yards for 1 TD and Stewart(3 of 4 for 23) threw 16 yards to Christian
Fauria for the other TD. But the offense only had 1 1st down in their
initial 14 play series.
On defense, Leonard Renfro and Ronnie Woolfork both excelled.
CU graduate, Rico Smith, impressed many NFL scouts at a recent scouting
combine by turning in the fastest 40 yard dash(4.31) of all wide receiver
prospects. Some of the draft analysts said that he was way under utilized
at CU and may end up being drafted in one of the early rounds.
Keith
|
18.520 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:17 | 17 |
| Buffs who got drafted include:
Joel Steed, 3rd round - Pittsburgh
Rico Smith, 7th round - Cleveland
Jay Leuwenburg, 9th round, Green Bay ??
Darian Hagan, 9th round, San Francisco
I haven't heard of DB Greg Thomas getting drafted which is a surprise to me.
In the Buffs last spring scrimage, Vance Joseph sprained his ankle after only
throwing 2 or 3 passes. Kordell Stewart then showed why the coaches are so
high on him. He was 13 for 19 for something like 230+ yards. Denver's
Channel 2 news showed a couple of his long passes that connected. They were
real pretty. It looked like he used little effort in throwing the ball
60+ yards and putting it right on the money. Stewart will start next year
and break all of Hagan's single season passing records. You heard it here
first.
Keith
|
18.521 | he marched right in :*) | GENRAL::WADE | Granma'sBiscuits&TomatoGravyROOLZ! | Tue Apr 28 1992 16:06 | 6 |
|
Keith,
Jay Lowenbrau (tm) went to Nawlins.
Claybone
|
18.522 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Apr 28 1992 16:35 | 3 |
| Lowenbrau!? That used to be good beer until they started making it
in Joisey. (I cain make fun a Jersey now, Wardle and Schneid are gone.)
Denny
|
18.523 | | GENRAL::WADE | Granma'sBiscuits&TomatoGravyROOLZ! | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:29 | 8 |
|
Keith,
I'm not sure now where Lowenbrau(tm) went. Page 1 of the local
rag says he went to New Orleans. Page 5 says he went to Kansas
City. Great paper eh?
Claybone
|
18.524 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:32 | 1 |
| He went to KC
|
18.525 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:42 | 1 |
| Glob says KC
|
18.526 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri May 22 1992 13:36 | 68 |
| This is a bit late, but hey, better late than never.
Wrapup of CU spring ball:
The Buffs finished up spring ball without their #1 (for now) quarterback
(Vance Joseph), and their #1 (Lamont Warren), #3 (Kendall Bussey), and #4
(Scott Phillips) tailbacks due to injuries. The spring opened with only
4 wide receivers on scholarship, but help is on the way in the fall from
incoming freshmen. Defensive will be definitely be the strenth of this team,
and it's a good thing because they may need to carry the burden while the new
offense is expected to struggle early on.
OFFENSIVE LINE: Still a year away, but stable. Last season, 2 starters didn't
even play in the previous spring. Many reps have improved pass protection.
Center Bryan Stoltenberg is the line's next star. OL is thin, so look for
incoming freshmen to contribute early.
QUARTERBACKS:
Vance Joseph: Best at play-action passes and staying in the pocket. He's also
the only proven performer, but his drop-back isn't very fast.
Kordell Stewart: A recket arm, but he strays from the pocket too much. He also
runs the option very well, but that won't matter much now.
Duke Tobin: Coaches like how he finds weaknesses in coverage, but his 5 picks
in spring intrasquad game didn't show it.
Coaches say they'll give Joseph, who missed the last week of spring ball with
a sprained ankle, every chance to keep the job. Will be a great race for the
starting position...to be continued in August.
TAILBACKS: One-back offense was literally that at the end of spring practice,
with James Hill being only one to avoid injury. Warren could've played, but
no need to risk it. Coaches are thrilled with how the new offense stretches
defenses, and isolating a healthy Warren on a linebacker may become CU's
biggest weapon. Also, Chuck Snowden has just announced that he will return
to the team after suffering an Achilles injury last August.
RECEIVERS: Solid and very thin. Michael Westbrook has most responsibility and
his blocking is improving. Charles Johnson is superb at split end, and Erik
Mitchell and T.J. Cunningham are neck-and-neck at flanker. Look for freshmen
Rae Carruth, Shay Davis or Steve Rosga to contribute early. TE Christian
Fauria was named the top sophomore-to-be of the spring.
DEFENSIVE LINEMEN: Very underrated. McCartney says Leonard Renfro "will be
one of the top defensive tackles in the country." NG Jeff Brunner practically
shared the job last year with Joel Steed. Marcellous Elder looks out of shpae
but isn't playing like it.
LINEBACKERS: The Sporting News has ranked this unit the tops in the nation.
OLB's Chad Brown and Ron Woolfork could be the best outside tandem in the
business. Greg Biekert is All-Big 8 on the inside. At the other spot,
incumbent Ted Johnson leads 4 other strong candidates.
DEFENSIVE BACKS: Ronnie Bradford and Deon Figures have become superb cover men
and free safety Dwayne Davis may be CU's best hitter. However, they'd better
not get hurt.
KICKERS: Punter Mitch Berger is trying to supplant Pat Blottiaux as place-
kicker, but Blottiaux was hitting them in scrimmages, in not in drills. In
the intrasquad and alumni games, Berger's punts have averaged 54.4 and 46.3
yards.
Joe
|
18.527 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri May 22 1992 14:53 | 41 |
| Well, I guess it's not too early to talk about the upcoming season.
I think Coach Mac changed the offense not only because of the success other
teams(Washington) have had with it but because he has the talent that fits
well into this type of offense. By talent, I mean Kordell Stewart(big,
strong arm), Lamont Warren (great runner, but is also an excellent receiver
with good hands and very fast 4.3 speed), Michael Westbrook (another
Mike Pritchard but only a sophmore), Christian Furia(an excellent receiver
tight end but not a knock-em over blocker). I agree that isolating Warren
on a linebacker will be downright scarey for other teams to defense. I've
said it before, don't be surprised to see Warren used more as a receiver
than a running back this year.
The offensive line should be better (but not great) this year and they
have some excellent freshman prospects. On the defensive line, Jeff Brunner
turned out to be a big surprise filling in for injured all big 8 NT Joel
Steed(3rd round NFL draft pick). In fact, I didn't think they lost anything
at all when Brunner filled in for Steed. Leonard Renfro is a stud. If he
stays healthy, I expect him to jump ship and be a top NFL draft pick at
the end of his junior year. In fact, I think he's the best lineman CU has
ever had.
Last year, the big defensive surprise came at linebacker. Ronnie Woolfork,
who is a converted QB, is extremely quick at getting to the QB. Ted Johnson
did an excellent job for a true freshman. Greg Biekert, who lead the team
in tackles the last two years, doesn't get the recognition he deserves.
Also, they got two of the most highly rated high school linebackers joining
the team this summer. There's no doubt, this is the strongest part of the
team.
Now, the bad news. It's true they are a little thin at wide receiver but
I'm most concerned with the defensive backfield. If anybody goes down with
an injury, especially Deon Figures, they're in deep trouble. Also, the
offensive line still has to prove itself. I'm also worried about the
kicking game, both punting and field goals. Too many games are decided by
those positions and Berger and Blottiaux haven't done much to gain my
confidence.
Hey Marty, are you out there ? What's going on in Husker country ?
Keith
|
18.529 | Go For It Turner Bud... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Jun 01 1992 12:16 | 123 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "George Rapp" 31-MAY-1992 15:34:23.66
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subj: Turner Gill story
Greeting, fellow Husker fanatics.
What follows is an article by Ivan Maisel that appeared in today's (31
May 1992) _Dallas Morning News_. It concerns former Husker QB Turner
Gill and his aspirations to be a major-college head football coach. It
was included in a set of articles that noted the lack of blacks as
Division I head football coaches (there are none currently).
---
Ex-Nebraska star hopes to move up in coaching ranks
SMU's Gill says someone must lead the way, and it may be him
By Ivan Maisel - Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News
Turner Gill has heard these voices before. He heard them when he left
Fort Worth's Arlington Heights High School in 1980 to play quarterback
for the University of Nebraska.
"Nebraska had never really had a black quarterback," Mr. Gill said.
"People said: 'You're not going to be able to play quarterback.
They're going to move you.' I really figures one day they will have a
black quarterback there; why not me?"
After a career during which he led the Cornhuskers on a 22-game winning
streak, threw for 34 touchdowns and rushed for 18 more, why not Mr.
Gill, indeed? He finished a failed two-point conversion away from
winning college football's national championship for the 1983 season.
He threw the pass that was batted away by Kenny Calhoun of the
University of Miami to preserve a 31-30 victory in the 1984 Orange Bowl
Classic. [[ 8^( -gwr ]]
Mr. Gill, 29, hears the voices again. There are no black head coaches
in NCAA Division I-A. He is a first-year assistant coaching receivers
at Southern Methodist University with dreams of moving up.
"Like Martin Luther King in civil rights," Mr. Gill said, "someone in
coaching is going to have to have a big, big influence in the
profession. The worst thing about it is, he's going to have to win."
It is the sort of job John Thompson has performed at Georgetown
University. Mr. Thompson became the first black college basketball
head coach to have an impact on the game. Now even the University of
Mississippi has a black basketball coach.
"It will work when we get the attention of the public, and it believes
in him," Mr. Gill said. "It may be some other guy. It may be me. Who
knows? ... It would be great if it's me. I have my goals. I've had
the opportunity to see a lot in life."
Long road to Dallas
Mr. Gill played two years for the Montreal Concorde of the Canadian
Football League. He played shortstop for three seasons in the Cleveland
Indians' farm system. His baseball career stopped in 1988 at Class
AA. Football beckoned again.
Mr. Gill spent the past three seasons on three campuses. He served as
a volunteer coach at the University of North Texas. [[ FYI: UNT is in
Denton, about 1 - 1 1/2 hours northwest of Dallas. -gwr ]] He has been
a graduate assistant at Nebraska and at SMU.
"That's three years I didn't make any money," Mr. Gill said, "and I've
got a wife (Gayle) and daughter (Jordan). I was in a position to make
sacrifices. I had made some money (playing pro football)."
The resume sparkles, but it's the reason Mr. Gill in no way resembles
the young black coach struggling to succeed. With no guarantees on the
other end, it's difficult to stop making money for two years.
Slim chances
"You talk to black coaches," Mr. Gill said, "and they say the chances
are good to be a GA (graduate assistant), but it's really, really tough
to get in there as a full-time assistant. If you get that, the chances
are really slim of getting a head-coaching job or a coordinator."
The odds didn't faze Mr. Gill. They may have fazed others.
Willie Fuller, 26, spent the 1989 season as a graduate assistant at the
University of Missouri before he accepted a job with a financial
company in Portland, Ore.
"There is such a need for young black coaches in Division I-A," said
Mr. Fuller, who is married and a father of two. "The tough thing is
getting people to start. If you have a family, it's tough to start."
Nebraska receivers coach Ron Brown had the opportunity to become the
first black coach in the Ivy League at Brown University, his alma
mater, in 1989. Before he turned down the job, Mr. Brown contacted Mr.
Fuller about coming with him.
Mr. Gill is the exception, Mr. Brown said. Mr. Fuller is the rule. It
doesn't bode well for the future of black coaches.
"Most people aren't as good as Turner Gill," Mr. Brown said. "The
average player who's black has a much tougher row to hoe."
---
.gwr...
George Rapp Electronic Data Systems Corporation
EDS Research 7171 Forest Lane, C212
(UUCP: uunet!edsr!midearthmail!gwr) Dallas, Texas 75230 214/661-6478
(Internet: [email protected] or [email protected])
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA14144; Sun, 31 May 92 14:33:41 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Sun, 31 May 92 16:25:26 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA25611; Sun, 31 May 92 16:33:31 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Sun, 31 May 92 16:15 CDT
% Date: Sun, 31 May 92 14:46:46 CDT
% From: [email protected] (George Rapp)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Turner Gill story
% Cc: [email protected]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.530 | Move Osborne to Athletic Director - PLEASE !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Jun 01 1992 12:22 | 56 |
| You asked for it - here are my pre-season thoughts in a nutshell.
Article 14764 of rec.sport.football.college:
Path: shodha.enet.dec.com!csc32.enet.dec.com!m_henderson
From: [email protected] (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big Eight Football
Keywords: Big Eight Football
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 28 May 92 17:39:04 GMT
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected] (Marty Henderson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)
Lines: 37
--
I know it's early yet but I see things stacking up in the Big-8 in this
light:
Coach McCartney is working hard on developing the passing game. I
don't just mean more passing - I mean THE PASSING GAME - a complete
offensive rework.
Ditto for Coach "Whats his name" at Oklahoma.
Coach Osborne at Nebraska was quoted as saying "...we will be ok, we
just need to work harder" in response to questions regarding conversion
to the passing game. Dr. Tom is STILL stuck in the '70's.
IF OU and CU can convert to the passing game with a good degree of success
then GOODBY HUSKERS in the Big-8 - we are talking 3rd place folks.
In the 70's and early 80's Nebraska did it with supperior athletes and
smashmouth football - NU still has supperior athletes ...NOT !!!!!!!!!
Get a clue Coach Tom. I love ya as a good leader of your players and your good
ethics etc - but EVERYONE in the good old U.S of A knows that your schemes
CAN'T beat the good passing schools and NU can't defend the pass!!!
You people in this newsgroup know me as "Nebraska Marty" and I am a die hard
Husker. (Native of Omaha now living in Colorado) I'm tellin ya - mark my
words - if OU and CU do indeed convert to "the passing game" then it's all
over for Nebraska - figure a loss at Washington, a loss at OU and a loss
at NU vs CU. Who knows what the Kansas teams have in store also.
Nebraska Marty (Or is it Husker Henderson this year?)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M_Henderson |
Marty Henderson | GO BIG RED... ...anyway ;^(
Woodland Park, Colorado |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
18.531 | Wishing summer was over | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jun 03 1992 11:48 | 4 |
| The Nebraska-Washington game on Sept. 19th will be televised by ESPN as
the 3rd game of their tripleheader that day.
Joe
|
18.532 | The Big punt. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Jun 15 1992 18:56 | 26 |
| A few weeks ago, I was watching a WLAF game. The team which was losing
was backed up close to their goal line and had to punt. They sent in their
kicker, Tom Rouen(ex-Buff). He went on to blast(and I mean blast) an
80-85 yard punt. The other team soon turned over the ball and Rouen's
team made a score and won the game. In 1989, Rouen was an All American kicker.
In fact, I think his kicks may have been the winning difference in the much
talked about CU-Nebraska game in 1989. In 1990 he was expected to be an NFL
draft choice but he was very inconsistent and made some terrible punts in
critical games. It's good to see him return to his previous form. The LA
Rams must have been impressed, they just signed him.
I was in Boulder last week and picked up a copy of their local rag. One
of their sports columnists said that Mel Kiper's 1992 Draft Digest also
has a draft preview for 1993 and 1994. According to Kiper, Chad Brown
is the 1993 2nd best NFL prospect for outside linebacker. He described him
as being very similar to Alonzo Spellman and a player who rarely makes
a mistake. He also has Michael Westbrook projected as the 34th overall
draft pick in 1994 which would mean he'd have to skip his senior year at CU.
Well, these multiple year draft previews are probably just a lot of smoke.
I just hope it's not a kiss of death.
I'm ready for college football. Bring on the marching bands, cheerleaders,
crazy college students and no instant replay. Does anybody know when the
players report back to campus to start practicing for the upcoming season ?
Keith
|
18.533 | August. Bring it on!! | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Tue Jun 16 1992 10:59 | 1 |
|
|
18.534 | Are the leaves starting to change, or is it just me | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Jun 16 1992 12:03 | 15 |
|
> I'm ready for college football. Bring on the marching bands, cheerleaders,
> crazy college students and no instant replay. Does anybody know when the
> players report back to campus to start practicing for the upcoming season ?
I *hate* this time of year. Another month or so and it won't be so
bad: NFL training camps will be starting up and you'll be able to see
the light at the end of the tunnel. At least after this summer we'll
have the Rockies. Doesn't even come close to the intensity of college
football, but at least it's something.
College teams usually start practicing about early to mid-August.
Joe
|
18.535 | Beg to differ | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jun 16 1992 12:07 | 7 |
| I love this time of year. Hockey - gone, basketball - sayanora,
football - even training camp is just a glint in some crazy fanatics
eyes. All there is is baseball, and none of that aluminum bat fake kind
they play in college.
The Crazy Met
|
18.536 | Ah cain't wait either! | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Tue Jun 16 1992 12:20 | 8 |
| Wait a sec Joe,
Ain't no leaf-turning in Colorado. All firs and pines no?? 8^)
And when're gittin' yo' butt out to South Bend to watch a real
college extravaganza?
MikeL
|
18.537 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Jun 16 1992 13:10 | 15 |
| > Wait a sec Joe,
> Ain't no leaf-turning in Colorado. All firs and pines no?? 8^)
Yea, and we still ride our horses to work out here in the Old West. :^)
> And when're gittin' yo' butt out to South Bend to watch a real
> college extravaganza?
As soon as you offer to buy my plane ticket back there. :^) It's gotta
be a quality opponent though - no Navies or Northwesterns. Another
thing: I'd have to sit in the visiting fans' section, cuz I'd probably
get killed by some lifelong ND fan making all my anti-ND comments.
Joe
|
18.538 | giddyup | GENRAL::WADE | fill yer hands you <CENSORED>!! | Tue Jun 16 1992 15:53 | 5 |
| >> Yea, and we still ride our horses to work out here in the Old West. :^)
THAT would be cool.........
Claybone
|
18.539 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Bounced out in 2nd round (sigh) | Tue Jun 16 1992 15:56 | 4 |
| Whats in South Bend thats worth watching or talking about? Is the
bend going north now?
Tim
|
18.540 | Maybe | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Tue Jun 16 1992 17:09 | 5 |
| -1,
Ah the soon to be College Football Hall of Fame??
MikeL
|
18.541 | College football in June, LOVE it! | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Tue Jun 16 1992 18:03 | 21 |
| Alright Joe,
Get yo' ace ready for the '94 Michigan-ND game. I'll have Tim Brown
deliver you tickets. This will be the last game for a coupla years
when the Irish clobber Ohio St in their stead. Now I'll show
you the campus, the buildup, etc. etc. One of your tickets will be
in the Nichigan section, the other in the ND section. First half
you get to sit in the Wolverine section. You'll feel all a ga-ga
listenin' to them whine and cry about the score ( goin' against
them natcherly) as they gain impressive but useless yardage.
Now second half you can sit in the Irish alumni section, even
bedecked in Maize and Blue. You'll hear nothing but praise for
the Wolverines and the inevitable consolation from the victorious
and classy Irish fans as Michigan deflates jest like a beachball
in the hands of the Ninj at Fenway.
You'll have fun, trust me.
8^),
MikeL
|
18.542 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jun 19 1992 12:33 | 3 |
| Gotta admit MikeL, that was pretty good.
Joe
|
18.543 | 1992 Big Eight Schedules | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jul 13 1992 14:01 | 119 |
| COLORADO
--------
Sept 5 COLORADO STATE
Sept 12 at Baylor
Sept 19 at Minnesota
Sept 26 IOWA
Oct 8 at Missouri (Thursday night)
Oct 17 OKLAHOMA
Oct 24 KANSAS STATE
Oct 31 at Nebraska
Nov 7 OKLAHOMA STATE
Nov 14 at Kansas
Nov 21 IOWA STATE
IOWA STATE
----------
Sept 5 OHIO
Sept 12 at Iowa
Sept 19 TULANE
Sept 26 NORTHERN IOWA
Oct 3 at Oklahoma
Oct 17 KANSAS
Oct 24 at Oklahoma State
Oct 31 MISSOURI
Nov 7 at Kansas State
Nov 14 NEBRASKA
Nov 21 at Colorado
KANSAS
------
Sept 5 at Oregon State
Sept 12 BALL STATE
Sept 19 at Tulsa
Sept 24 CALIFORNIA (Thursday night)
Oct 10 KANSAS STATE
Oct 17 at Iowa State
Oct 24 OKLAHOMA
Oct 31 OKLAHOMA STATE
Nov 7 at Nebraska
Nov 14 COLORADO
Nov 21 at Missouri
KANSAS STATE
------------
Sept 19 MONTANA
Sept 26 TEMPLE
Oct 3 NEW MEXICO STATE
Oct 10 at Kansas
Oct 17 at Utah State
Oct 24 at Colorado
Oct 31 at Oklahoma
Nov 7 IOWA STATE
Nov 14 at Missouri
Nov 21 OKLAHOMA STATE
Dec 6 Nebraska (at Tokyo)
MISSOURI
--------
Sept 12 at Illinois
Sept 19 TEXAS A&M
Sept 26 at Indiana
Oct 3 MARSHALL
Oct 8 COLORADO (Thursday night)
Oct 17 at Oklahoma State
Oct 24 NEBRASKA
Oct 31 at Iowa State
Nov 7 at Oklahoma
Nov 14 KANSAS STATE
Nov 21 KANSAS
NEBRASKA
--------
Sept 5 UTAH
Sept 12 MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE
Sept 19 at Washington
Sept 26 ARIZONA STATE
Oct 10 OKLAHOMA STATE
Oct 24 at Missouri
Oct 31 COLORADO
Nov 7 KANSAS
Nov 14 at Iowa State
Nov 27 at Oklahoma (Friday after Thanksgiving)
Dec 6 Kansas State (at Tokyo)
OKLAHOMA
--------
Sept 3 at Texas Tech (Thursday night)
Sept 12 ARKANSAS STATE
Sept 19 USC
Oct 3 IOWA STATE
Oct 10 Texas (at Dallas)
Oct 17 at Colorado
Oct 24 at Kansas
Oct 31 KANSAS STATE
Nov 7 MISSOURI
Nov 14 at Oklahoma State
Nov 27 NEBRASKA (Friday after Thanksgiving)
OKLAHOMA STATE
--------------
Sept 5 INDIANA STATE
Sept 19 at Michigan
Sept 26 TULSA
Oct 3 at TCU
Oct 10 at Nebraska
Oct 17 MISSOURI
Oct 24 IOWA STATE
Oct 31 at Kansas
Nov 7 at Colorado
Nov 14 OKLAHOMA
Nov 21 at Kansas State
|
18.544 | Husker News 16-Jul-1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:39 | 189 |
| The views in this note are not necessarily my own - Marty Henderson
From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 16-JUL-1992 12:29:13.14
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker News, Notes, etc.
Well, it's almost time to get geared up for The Season here in Nebraska.
I'm going to be out of town for two weeks in August, and will probably miss
some of the beginning-of-practice hype (awww, darn!), but thought I'd let
you know I'm still around.
Two QB's are transferring from NU, but neither was expected to contend for
starting QB this year. Nebraska had something like 10 QB's for Spring
practice, plus one of the top HS QB prospects, Tommy(?) Frazier from Florida.
Some of the football magazines are picking Nebraska as high as #6, based
on the strength of our running game, I guess.
I-back Scott Baldwin will not be competing this fall, following his being
found 'guilty by reason of temporary insanity' for attacking a Lincoln woman
last January. He continues therapy and at last report was living with Husker
Assistant Head Coach Frank Solich. (The court required him to either live
with one of the coaches or with his pastor.)
This will be Bob Devaney's last season as AD, of course, but for the moment
the rumors of any impending retirement plans for Tom Osborne are dormant.
I think most people here have assumed Frank Solich was heir-apparent as
Head FB coach, but with a new AD from outside (Oregon), that may not be
such a sure thing anymore.
The following article from rec.sport.football.college might get you riled up,
but it is probably a reasonable pre-season prediction. BTW, no HOME team
is indicated in the K-State vs NU game, 'cause it is in Tokyo on Dec 6th.
(K State will probably wear 'home' uniforms, because the game would have
otherwise been in Manhattan.)
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
>Here is my computer's prediction for the Big 8 Confernece (happy Scott? :-)
>Again, home team in CAPS:
>
>1. Oklahoma (11-0,7-0):
>
>oklahoma over TEXAS TECH by 3
>OKLAHOMA over arkansas state by 25
>OKLAHOMA over southern cal by 10
>OKLAHOMA over iowa state by 16
>oklahoma over texas by 7
>oklahoma over COLORADO by 2
>oklahoma over KANSAS by 4
>OKLAHOMA over kansas state by 9
>OKLAHOMA over missouri by 19
>oklahoma over OKLAHOMA STATE by 10
>OKLAHOMA over nebraska by 4
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>2. Nebraska (9-2,6-1):
>
>NEBRASKA over utah by 15
>NEBRASKA over m tennessee st
>WASHINGTON over nebraska by 10
>NEBRASKA over arizona state by 9
>NEBRASKA over oklahoma state by 15
>nebraska over MISSOURI by 12
>NEBRASKA over colorado by 8
>NEBRASKA over kansas by 9
>nebraska over IOWA STATE by 9
>OKLAHOMA over nebraska by 4
>nebraska over kansas state by 4
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>3. Kansas (7-4,5-2):
>
>kansas over OREGON STATE by 6
>KANSAS over ball state by 11
>TULSA over kansas by 1
>california over KANSAS by 3
>KANSAS over kansas state by 2
>kansas over IOWA STATE by 3
>oklahoma over KANSAS by 4
>KANSAS over oklahoma state by 9
>NEBRASKA over kansas by 9
>KANSAS over colorado by 2
>kansas over MISSOURI by 7
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>4. Colorado (8-3,4-3):
>
>COLORADO over colorado state by 14
>colorado over BAYLOR by 1
>colorado over MINNESOTA by 8
>COLORADO over iowa by 4
>colorado over MISSOURI by 8
>oklahoma over COLORADO by 2
>COLORADO over kansas state by 3
>NEBRASKA over colorado by 8
>COLORADO over oklahoma state by 10
>KANSAS over colorado by 2
>COLORADO over iowa state by 11
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>5. Kansas State (7-4,3-4):
>
>KANSAS STATE over montana
>KANSAS STATE over temple by 15
>KANSAS STATE over new mexico st by 18
>KANSAS over kansas state by 2
>kansas state over UTAH STATE by 4
>COLORADO over kansas state by 3
>OKLAHOMA over kansas state by 9
>KANSAS STATE over iowa state by 10
>kansas state over MISSOURI by 8
>KANSAS STATE over oklahoma state by 10
>nebraska over kansas state by 4
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>6. Oklahoma State (3-8,2-5):
>
>OKLAHOMA STATE over indiana state
>MICHIGAN over oklahoma state by 17
>tulsa over OKLAHOMA STATE by 1
>TX CHRISTIAN over oklahoma state by 3
>NEBRASKA over oklahoma state by 15
>OKLAHOMA STATE over missouri by 6
>OKLAHOMA STATE over iowa state by 3
>KANSAS over oklahoma state by 9
>COLORADO over oklahoma state by 10
>oklahoma over OKLAHOMA STATE by 10
>KANSAS STATE over oklahoma state by 10
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>7. Iowa State (4-7,1-6):
>
>IOWA STATE over ohio by 9
>IOWA over iowa state by 9
>IOWA STATE over tulane by 8
>IOWA STATE over no illinois by 10
>OKLAHOMA over iowa state by 16
>kansas over IOWA STATE by 3
>OKLAHOMA STATE over iowa state by 3
>IOWA STATE over missouri by 6
>KANSAS STATE over iowa state by 10
>nebraska over IOWA STATE by 9
>COLORADO over iowa state by 11
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>8. Missouri (1-10,0-7):
>
>ILLINOIS over missouri by 11
>texas a&m over MISSOURI by 12
>INDIANA over missouri by 12
>MISSOURI over marshall
>colorado over MISSOURI by 8
>OKLAHOMA STATE over missouri by 6
>nebraska over MISSOURI by 12
>IOWA STATE over missouri by 6
>OKLAHOMA over missouri by 19
>kansas state over MISSOURI by 8
>kansas over MISSOURI by 7
>
>Respectfully Submitted,
> ____
>Darryl E. Marsee | \ 1926 CCSG/SCCI, 205 Perry St.
>Control Data Systems | * \ Robins Air Force Base, GA 31098
>(912) 926-7661 |_____/ [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA05401; Thu, 16 Jul 92 11:28:02 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Thu, 16 Jul 92 13:27:07 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA00741; Thu, 16 Jul 92 13:28:01 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Thu, 16 Jul 92 12:08 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 16 Jul 92 12:08 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker News, Notes, etc.
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.545 | Husker News 17-Jul-1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:40 | 43 |
| For the first time in 20 years, the University of Nebraska will sell pairs
of renewable season football tickets. About 2,000 tickets in the upper rows
of the South Stadium will be available as a result of the decreased interest
in student tickets.
In 1982, about 17,000 student tickets were sold. Last year, around 8,000
student tickets were sold. So far this year only 3.500 student tickets have
been sold. Although additional tickets will be sold at the beginning of
the semester, a UNL representative said that they will be happy if they
reach the 8,000 mark this year.
The decline in student sales is not just a Nebraska phenomenon. Oklahoma
student sales are also half of what they used to be, and at the University
of Iowa sales had declined from 13,000 to 5,500 before rebounding to 8,500
last year after Iowa's appearance in the 1991 Rose Bowl.
The Nebraska tickets are $128 apiece or $256 for a pair, plus a $3 handling
charge. If the University receives requests for more than 2000 tickets,
priority will be given to members of booster clubs. For more information,
call the UNL ticket office at 402-423-3111.
---
Turner Gill will return to Nebraska as a full-time assistant coach.
The former NU quarterback had been a graduate assistant at Nebraska
before he was hired by SMU.
Gill replaces assistant coach Jack Pierce, who has served as Nebraska's
head road recruiter since 1985. Restrictions by the NCAA on the amount
of time coaches can spend on the road have led to Pierce's transfer to
the athletic development office, where he will serve as a fund raiser.
---
Mike Nolan
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA18676; Fri, 17 Jul 92 09:32:49 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Fri, 17 Jul 92 11:32:03 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios.unl.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA07315; Fri, 17 Jul 92 11:33:07 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Fri, 17 Jul 92 09:22 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Fri, 17 Jul 92 09:22 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, July 17th, 1992
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.546 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:24 | 34 |
| Here's the results of the Big 8 preseason media poll (first-place votes
in parenthesis and total points):
1. Colorado (34) 639
2. Nebraska (31) 638
3. Oklahoma (26) 619
4. Kansas 443
5. Kansas State 338
6. Missouri 242
7. Iowa State 214
8. Oklahoma State 147
This vote is so close I don't think it's fair/right to say flat-out
that CU's the favorite. I've seen 2 preseason mags, and one of the
picked the finish to be NU, CU, OU, in that order, and the other picked
OU, CU, NU, in that order, so it would make most sense to say that the
3 teams are very close and ony one of them could win the conference. I
think another thing all these close and disagreeing polls indicate is alot
of confusion and questions about how good each of the 3 are and what to
expect out of them. The Buffs have alot of talent but it is young and
they are switching to a new offense that could suffer some growing
pains. Nebraska lost alot of people, but with the depth they always
seem to produce and the way they groom their players into starting
roles it usually is just a case of them reloading, not rebuilding.
And OU, well they're supposed to be going all-out with that passing
game this year and if the Gator Bowl is any indication, it will be
potent. But they're 1-8 under Gibbs against their 3 big rivals and the
defense isn't returning many starters from last year's tough unit.
Should be interesting, to say the least.
Joe
|
18.547 | A Few Husker Bits... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:27 | 18 |
| Turner Gill is now Nebraska's full-time Quarterbacks coach. Oh thank you God.
Pleeeaaaase let the spirit of Turner descend upon the current Husker QB's. ;^)
Going into camp this year - Coach Stuck in the 70's has announced that Grant
is the leading QB and will have to be beat out of the position. Gag, hack,
cough, barf....
Grant stinks. He couldent even beat out Micky Joseph who sucked eggs himself.
I'm told by the boys back in Omaha, NE field svc (the ones that are left) that
NU has some really HOT Frosh QB's. We are talkin very good drop-back QB
prospects.
Will Osbonre use one of these young QB's? Only after Grant screws up so bad
that Coach Stuck in the 70's hand will be forced. Lets hope this happens
BEFORE the game AT Washington.
Go HUSKERS - Kick some Big-8 Butts this year !!! (God knows we can't beat a
REAL top-20 team) ;^)
|
18.548 | Husker Notes Aug 13 1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:22 | 24 |
| A short edition this time.
Football practice started yesterday with the traditional media day. The
defensive line took a page from the Olympics and showed up for the cameras
with their heads shaved. (Of course, the volleyball team didn't win the
Gold, let's hope this doesn't foreshadow the season.)
Tom Osborne says that Mike Grant and Tony Veland start out 'dead even' in
the race for starting quarterback.
Mike Nolan
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA20182; Thu, 13 Aug 92 11:00:28 -0700
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA16905; Thu, 13 Aug 92 11:35:26 -0400
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Thu, 13 Aug 92 10:34:17 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA00342; Thu, 13 Aug 92 10:35:18 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Thu, 13 Aug 92 10:31 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 10:31 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: husker notes, August 13th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.549 | Go Veland - Teach Him Good Turner Gill | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:25 | 8 |
| re: last 2 (My own)
Looks like my source was a little off about Grant. Veland is one of the hot
shot your Husker QB's I've heard about. He's from Omaha but he is supposed to
be good - REALLY good. We shall see. He HAS to be better than Grant. I'm almost
better than Grant. ;^)
Husker Henderson (aka: Nebraska Marty)
|
18.550 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:59 | 6 |
| I believe that other "hotshot" frosh QB is Tommie Frazier from
either Florida or South Carolina. He was coveted by mucho schools.
Supposed to be a real blue chipper. Time will tell.
MikeL
|
18.551 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 13 1992 17:18 | 4 |
| Tommy Frazier was very highly recruited - considered one of the top
QB's coming out of high school.
Joe
|
18.552 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Aug 13 1992 18:34 | 11 |
| >I believe that other "hotshot" frosh QB is Tommie Frazier from
>either Florida or South Carolina. He was coveted by mucho schools.
>Supposed to be a real blue chipper. Time will tell.
Yep, from everything that I have read, he is the highest rated option QB
who is entering the college ranks. I've also seen him ranked as rated as
high as the 4th best overall football player coming out of high school.
He is from Florida.
Keith
|
18.553 | Chose the Huskers over me Irish | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Aug 14 1992 13:34 | 5 |
| Yeah, Frazier's supposed the be the second coming of Tony Rice who can
in southron dialect, th'ow.
MikeL
|
18.554 | Go Huskers!!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Aug 17 1992 18:02 | 8 |
| Thats right - FRAZIER. I seem to remember a big recuriting war for this guy
with the Florida schools. I wonder why he picked a northern/cold state.
Is he a true freshman this year or a redshirt frosh like Veland?
I hope he pans out and Nebraska time-warps into the 90's.
Husker Henderson
|
18.555 | He'll play good until he gets horned by a Buffalo | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Aug 17 1992 19:27 | 13 |
| >Thats right - FRAZIER. I seem to remember a big recuriting war for this guy
>with the Florida schools. I wonder why he picked a northern/cold state.
I don't know for sure but I'll bet it's because Nebraska is the last major
power that still utilizes option QBs. He was not know as the best Drop
Back passer but rather as the best option QB prospect. He'll run a lot
for NU but probably wouldn't get to run much at Florida, Miami or FSU.
>Is he a true freshman this year or a redshirt frosh like Veland?
True freshman.
Keith
|
18.556 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 18 1992 10:53 | 7 |
| Frazier was also being heavily recruited by ND. (Way to go Huskers!)
He picked Nebraska because they provided the best opportunity to play
early.
Joe
|
18.557 | Ah well, lost anudder one | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 18 1992 17:08 | 11 |
| Yup,
I hear that Frazier picked NU over ND.
What's the QB situation at Nebraska? Will Frazier compete for the
top job?
If he had gone to ND, he would have been in the hunt for the
starting QB job in his sophomore year after Mirer left. The
2nd and 3rd string QB's at ND weren't exactly raising eyebrows.
And ND certainly has run the option well, look as recently as Rice.
MikeL
|
18.558 | I'll take Veland or Frazier - BENCH Grant !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 20 1992 14:02 | 7 |
| re: -1
What I hear from the "guys back in Omaha" is that Veland is running slightly
ahead of Grant. My GUESS (and it is just a guess at this point) is that Frazier
will redshirt UNLESS Grant goes down with his normal yearly injury.
Husker Henderson
|
18.559 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:01 | 5 |
| Butkus award candidate Chad Brown of the Buffs broke his right hand in
practice yesterday but will be back at practice next week. He'll wear
a soft cast for 6-8 weeks.
Joe
|
18.560 | More Buff News | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:29 | 18 |
| It looks like sophmore Parade All-American offensive lineman, Dolyn Jackson,
is getting booted off the team. He missed 3 or 4 games last year because
of academics. Then he missed all of spring practice because of bad grades.
Now in summer practice, he's missed a couple of team meetings. Mac told him
it would be best if he found another school to attend and play for.
True freshman, Rae Carruth, has been impressing the coaches enough to
become Michael Westbrook's backup. According to the coaches, he'll see
playing time in the opener against CSU.
I think CU may become known as the "Linebacker U" of the 90's. A couple
of years ago they had Williams and McGee. Now, with Brown, Biekert and
Woolfork, they have 3 more linebackers that will probably make it in the
pros. And they landed 3 of the most talented linebackers(Greg Jones,
Thadus Swazer and Matt Russell) in the nation in this years recruiting
class.
Keith
|
18.561 | Some Interesting Bowl Stats... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:00 | 129 |
| In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] writes:
Path: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!mips!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!ogicse!reed!henson!news.u.washington.edu!max.u.washington.edu!daytrpr
From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Bowl Records
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 20 Aug 92 19:34:33 GMT
Sender: [email protected] (USENET News System)
Lines: 110
I've compiled some bowl statistics that I though everyone would like
to look at. One note, I COULD NOT FIND STATS FOR THE INDEPENDANTS, so
you won't see Notre Dame, Penn State, etc. If anyone has them, please
feel free to post them or add to this! Thanks.
MOST BOWL VICTORIES
1. Alabama 24
2. USC 22
3. Oklahoma 19
4. Georgia Tech17
Tennessee 17
6. Texas 16
7. Georgia 14
Nebraska 14
9. Mississippi 13
10.Washington 12
Auburn 12
BEST % (Five or more Bowl Appearances)
Toledo 87.5%
Purdue 80%
Oklahoma St. 75%
Kentucky 71.4%
Miami (OHIO) 71.4%
Georgia Tech 68%
Oklahoma 65%
USC 64.7%
Fresno St. 63.6%
Arizona St. 63.3%
Washington 62.5%
Clemson 61.1%
Florida St. 60%
Worst % (Five or more appearances)
South Carolina 0%
Virginia Tech 16.7%
Kansas 16.7%
Wisconsin 16.7%
Texas Tech 25%
Colorado 31.3%
Arizona 31.3%
TCU 32.1%
BYU 34.4%
N. Carolina 37.5%
Oregon 37.5%
Arkansas 38.9%
20 or more bowl appearances:
Alabama 44
USC 34
Texas 34
Tennessee 32
Oklahoma 30
Nebraska 30
Georgia 30
LSU 28
Arkansas 27
Georgia Tech 25
Mississippi 24
Ohio State 24
Auburn 23
Michigan 23
Washington 20
Florida St. 20
And finally, a sort of "Best Bowl Team" list considering # of wins
and winning %.
USC 22 12 0 .647
Alabama 24 17 3 .580
Oklahoma 19 10 1 .650
Georgia Tech 17 8 0 .680
Tennessee 17 15 0 .531
Texas 16 16 2 .500
Washington 12 7 1 .625
Georgia 14 13 3 .517
Mississippi 13 11 0 .542
Auburn 12 9 2 .565
Oklahoma St. 9 3 0 .750
Clemson 11 7 0 .611
Florida St. 11 7 2 .600
Nebraska 14 16 0 .467
Texas A&M 11 8 0 .579
Toledo 7 1 0 .875
UCLA 10 7 1 .583
Arizona St. 9 5 1 .633
Miami (FLA) 10 8 0 .556
Ohio St. 11 13 0 .458
What I did for that last list is multiply wins by %, so I guess that
gives you sort of a measure of who's most likely to win bowl games
throughout the history of college football or something like that.
I dunno.
Anyway, enjoy.
-Steve
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M_Henderson | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
Marty Henderson | I find it most intriguing." --- Data,
Woodland Park, Colorado | Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
18.562 | Pre-Season UPI Top-25 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:02 | 50 |
| Article 18024 of rec.sport.football.college:
Path: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: [email protected] (Vince Rhee)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: UPI/NFF Top 25 Preseason Poll
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 21 Aug 92 14:10:18 GMT
Sender: [email protected]
Distribution: na
Organization: Chocaholics Anonymous
Lines: 36
Here is the preseason UPI/NFF Top 25 poll for the upcoming college
football season as reported in today's _Houston Chronicle_:
1. Miami (52)
2. Washington (29)
3. Notre Dame ( 5)
4. Fla. St. ( 1)
5. Michigan
6. Florida ( 3)
7. Alabama
8. Penn St.
9. Texas A&M
10. Syracuse ( 1)
11. Oklahoma
12. Nebraska
13. Iowa
14. Colorado
15. Georgia
16. Clemson
17. Stanford
18. UCLA
19. California
20. Ohio St.
21. Tennessee
22. Miss. St.
23. Virginia
24. USC
25. Ga. Tech
--
Vince Rhee |
[email protected] | ...and I would have gotten away with it, too,
Department of ECE | if it hadn't been for those meddling kids!
University of Texas |
|
18.563 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Fri Aug 21 1992 17:03 | 7 |
|
Well, you won't see ND in any of the "most wins" or "most Appearances"
column seeing that before 1970's Cotton Bowl with Texas, ND had last
appeared in the 1925 Rose Bowl. Be interested to see their %.
MikeL
|
18.564 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:52 | 7 |
| NU backup QB Tony Veland apparently broke his collarbone and could be
out 8 weeks.
Could open the door for Frazier if Grant falters.
Joe
|
18.565 | Predictions anyone ?? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:49 | 46 |
| It's only 9 days until the kick off time. Any Big 8 predictions out there.
here's mine:
Keith
1. Colorado
2. Nebraska
3. Kansas
4. Oklahoma
5. Kansas State
6. Iowa State
7. Okla State
8. Missouri
It's really impossible to predict a Big 8 champ. I only went with the Buffs
since they're my favorite team. The biggest game will be Haloween day when
the Buffs and the Huskers play in Lincoln. Both teams have will return
almost all of their starters and there is lot's of talent on both teams.
With the best offensive line in the Big 8, NU will also have the best running
attack. CU will have the best defense. If CU's new passing attack is fine
tuned by Haloween day and if the weather is good, CU will win. Otherwise,
the Husker's win and go to the Orange bowl.
You may be surprised by my pick of Oklahoma coming in 4th. It's true
that Gundy is a good QB and the Sooner's have learned a lot about passing
the ball but the supporting cast just isn't there. They will only return 3
starters to the defense and the offense won't return many more. Probation
from a couple of years ago really hurt their experienced depth. After tough
games against Texas and CU, they have to travel to Manhatten, Kansas where
Dana Stublefield and the Jayhawks will do a number on Gundy for the biggest
Big 8 upset of the year. Glen Mason just got a 5 year contract extension
at Kansas and the reason why is that he's a very good coach. In the coming
years, he may make the Big 8 a 4 team race for the Orange Bowl.
All of the other * States could easily be interchanged from the order I
picked them. Okla State is the most likely to move up but not past 5th
place in the Big 8. Okla State's, DT Jason Gilden wreaks havoc where ever
he plays.
I can't understand why Missouri is so bad. They're in the middle of a
highly populated state with Kansas City and St Louis metropolitan areas
to recruit from but they never seem to put together a talented team.
They looked real bad last year and don't improve at all this year.
Keith
|
18.566 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 26 1992 18:22 | 26 |
|
> You may be surprised by my pick of Oklahoma coming in 4th.
Yes, very surprised. At this point I would give OU, NU, and CU each
about an equal chance of winning the conference, but I don't think
anyone else can break into the top 3.
> After tough
> games against Texas and CU, they have to travel to Manhatten, Kansas where
> Dana Stublefield and the Jayhawks will do a number on Gundy for the biggest
> Big 8 upset of the year.
Small nit, Keith. KU is in Lawrence, KSU in the one in Manhattan.
> I can't understand why Missouri is so bad. They're in the middle of a
> highly populated state with Kansas City and St Louis metropolitan areas
> to recruit from but they never seem to put together a talented team.
> They looked real bad last year and don't improve at all this year.
I remember them having some good teams in the early 80's. It was the
opposite that it is now - they were drubbing CU every year the 2 teams
played. The Tigers were even close to going to the Orange Bowl, but I
don't think they could ever get over the hump and beat OU or NU.
Joe
|
18.567 | Husker Notes, August 26th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:38 | 40 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 26-AUG-1992 13:59:27.21
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, August 26th
Tom Osborne's choices for starting quarterback got simpler yesterday, but
not the way he would have wanted. After Spring practice, senior Mike Grant and
redshirt freshman Tony Veland were tied for first team on the depth chart, but
Veland had slipped into a tie for 2nd team on the latest chart. However,
Veland broke his collarbone in practice yesterday, apparently when someone fell
on it, and will be out for up to 8 weeks. While this makes Grant the apparent
choice for starting QB this leaves the backup job wide open.
In the same practice session, freshman QB Tommie Frasier turned his ankle. Two
other quarterbacks are also ailing, redshirt freshman Brook Berringer with
a sore arm, senior Joel Cornwell with a sore shoulder.
Buffalo Bills rookie Nate Turner says that playing at Nebraska hurt his
chances of earning a slot on the Bills NFL roster, because of the lack
of passing at NU. Three NU receivers were drafted by the NFL last spring,
Turner, sophomore Johnny Mitchell by the Jets, and Jon Bostick, who was
cut by Denver on Monday.
Sports Illustrated ranks Oklahoma number 9, Colorado number 12, and Nebraska
number 17 in their pre-season rankings.
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA15201; Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:36:21 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 26 Aug 92 14:35:28 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA23998; Wed, 26 Aug 92 14:36:28 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 Aug 92 13:58 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 13:58 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, August 26th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.568 | Throw the stinking ball Osborne - Daggummit !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:42 | 15 |
| re: -1
This is bad news for Husker fans who have seen Mike Grant play QB. Grant
is really good - NOT !!!!!
Lets just hope that this opens the door for Frazier. Osborne plays true
frosh only on very rare instances though. I do think that Grant will stumble.
He has had a history of injuries so he may get hurt or his performance will
just bite. Then Frazier can step forward. Veland's injury may have saved
Frazier from redshirting this year.
Too bad - I have been hearing good things about Veland. The up side is that
this kid is a redshirt freshman - he will be back.
Husker Henderson
|
18.569 | Ralphie Roolz!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:01 | 7 |
| I got SI's college football preview yesterday, they labeled CU as
having the best mascot. Cool!
They said Nebraska had the best fans.
Joe
|
18.570 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Aug 28 1992 11:50 | 4 |
| They also said that Penn State had the best unifrorms, so take
it for what it's worth. 8^)
/Don
|
18.571 | There is no place like NEBRASKA | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Aug 28 1992 15:44 | 6 |
| re: -1
> They said Nebraska had the best fans.
Yessss, Yes!!! I've been saying that for years. All SI had to do was
ASK ME !!! ;^)
|
18.572 | Gretchen, is this Nebraska? | FRETZ::HEISER | as warm as tears | Fri Aug 28 1992 16:47 | 1 |
| they need the best fans with all that humidity!
|
18.573 | Watch the Husker and eat - Not much else to do | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Aug 31 1992 18:12 | 8 |
| re: -1
...and the heat, and the cold, and the flat land, and the "farmer" drivers,
etc...
But they have the best sweet corn and the best steaks in the world !!! They
also have the fatest women. ;^)
|
18.574 | Utah may be better than you think. Could be a tuff opener. | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Aug 31 1992 18:20 | 20 |
| It appears that the starting QB for Nebraska will be - GAG - Grant. Looks
like CU will start Stewart as Joseph has a sore arm.
Huskers play Utah next week. On the surface this seems like just another
early season Husker mismatch. But I'm not so sure. Last year Utah - a passing
school - ran up and down the field vs the Blackshirts (NU Defense) even though
Nebraska won.
As I understand it, Utah has almost all of their offensive starters back and
they are picked to take 3rd or so in the WAC. So it appears they may be better
than you might think. Look for them to air it out vs the Huskers and probably
rack up some impressive yards. I would be supprised if they upset NU though.
Looks like Jones will start at I-back and Brown will play some wingback. The
intent is to have BOTH players in the game at the same time so the defenses
can't key on the I-back.
Geez I hope Osbore gets a passing life.
Husker Henderson
|
18.575 | Husker Notes Sep. 1st | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:00 | 48 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 1-SEP-1992 08:48:34.14
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: husker note, Sep 1st
I'm still waiting for a full depth chart to be printed, but Mike Grant will
be the starting QB against Utah this Saturday, with senior Joel Cornwall in
the 2nd chair. Of the two freshman QB's, Ben Rutz will likely redshirt, and
Tommie Frazier is 3rd string.
Scholarships have been awarded to junior guard Ken Mehlin, senior gard
Chris Zyzda, and senior tight end Mike Vedral.
Strong safety Toby Wright, a transfer player, is eligible to play this
season.
QB Tony Veland is gone until mid-October (broken collarbone), other players
with minor injuries that are healing include IB Calvin Jones (toenail)
SE Tyrone Hughes (ankle) and OT Zach Wiegert (leg muscle)
Utah returned 1000 tickets from their allotment, there doesn't seem to be
any panic about them not selling by Saturday, though.
The Nebraska-Utah game will be the Big Eight's featured game on the Prime
Network same-day coverage, with the game shown at midnight on Saturday and
again at 6pm on Sunday. Prime is also showing all eight coaches' shows
starting at 3pm on Wednesday.
Governor Nelson has called another special session of the Nebraska Legislature,
to trim around $110 million from the biennial budget. How this will affect
the University (or any other specific entity) isn't known yet.
Nebraska is a 29 point favorite over Utah.
---
Mike Nolan
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA13130; Tue, 1 Sep 92 07:49:09 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Tue, 1 Sep 92 09:48:22 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA21962; Tue, 1 Sep 92 09:49:31 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 Sep 92 09:06 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 09:06 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: husker note, Sep 1st
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.576 | TV Schedules for us couch QB's | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:02 | 158 |
| Article 18536 of rec.sport.football.college:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Path: nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!alc!stassen
From: [email protected] (Chris Stassen)
Subject: College Football TV Listings
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Nntp-Posting-Host: stash
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 20:08:43 GMT
[All listed times are Pacific, some games may be local only, but I can't
tell from the listing.]
9/03: 4:45pm ESPN Oklahoma at Texas Tech
9/05: 9:30am ESPN Louisville at Ohio State
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN Mississippi State at Texas
5:00pm ABC Miami at Iowa
7:30pm SC Washington at Arizona State (West only?)
9/10: 4:45pm ESPN San Diego State at BYU
9/12: 9:30am ESPN Iowa State at Iowa
10:00am NBC Michigan at Notre Dame
11:00am SC Hawaii at Air Force (West only?)
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC Washington State at Arizona (West only?)
4:30pm ESPN Florida State at Clemson
9/17: 4:45pm ESPN Pittsburgh at Rutgers
9/19: 9:00am ABC (teams to be announced)
9:30am ESPN Oklahoma State at Michigan
11:00am SC UCLA at BYU (West only?)
12:30pm ESPN Notre Dame at Michigan State
3:30pm ESPN Ohio State at Syracuse
6:30pm ESPN Nebraska at Washington <--------------------
9/24: 4:45pm ESPN Cal at Kansas
9/26: 9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
9:30am SC Lehigh at Cornell
10:00am NBC Purdue at Notre Dame
12:30pm ANC (teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
10:00pm SC BYU at Hawaii
10/01: 4:45pm ESPN Florida at Mississippi State
10/03: 9:00am ABC (teams to be announced)
9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
10:00am NBC Stanford at Notre Dame
11:00am SC Utah State at BYU
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
10/08: 4:45pm ESPN Colorado at Missouri
10/10: 9:00am ABC (teams to be announced)
9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN Notre Dame at Pittsburgh
7:30pm ESPN Stanford at UCLA
10/17: 9:00am ABC (teams to be announced)
9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
11:00am SC BYU at Wyoming
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
1:00pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
10/24: 9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
9:30am SC Dartmouth at Cornell
10:00am NBC BYU at Notre Dame
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
10/29: 4:45pm ESPN Mississippi at East Carolina
10/31: 9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
11:00am SC (WAC, teams to be announced)
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
1:00pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
11/05: 4:45pm ESPN Iowa State at Kansas State
11/07: 9:30am ESPN (Big Ten, teams to be announced)
10:00am NBC Boston College at Notre Dame
11:00am SC New Mexico at BYU
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
11/12: 4:45pm ESPN Texas A&M at Houston
11/14: 9:00am ABC Illinois at Michigan
10:00am NBC Penn State at Notre Dame
11:00am SC BYU at Air Force
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
11/21: 9:00am ABC Michigan at Ohio State
11:00am SC BYU at Utah
12:30pm ABC (teams to be announced)
3:30pm SC (Pac-10, teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
11/26: 10:00am ABC Auburn at Alabama
TBA ESPN Texas A&M at Texas
11/27: 10:30am ABC Nebraska at Oklahoma
1:00pm ESPN Louisiana State at Arkansas
11/28: 9:00am ABC (teams to be announced)
1:00pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
4:30pm ESPN (teams to be announced)
5:00pm ABC Notre Dame at Southern Cal
12/5: 9:00am ABC Army vs. Navy
12:30pm ABC SEC Championship Game
12/18: 5:00pm ESPN Las Vegas Silver Bowl (MAC #1 vs. Big West #1)
12/25: 12:30pm ABC Aloha Bowl (WAC #2 vs. Big 8 #3)
TBA ABC Blue-Gray Game
12/29: 5:00pm ESPN Copper Bowl (teams to be announced)
6:00pm (tba) Freedom Bowl (Pac-10 #3 vs. to be announced)
12/30: 5:00pm ESPN Holiday Bowl (WAC #1 vs. Big Ten #3)
12/31: 9:30am ESPN Independence Bowl (teams to be announced)
11:30am CBS Sun Bowl (Coalition 2 vs. to be announced)
3:00pm TBS Gator Bowl (Coalition 2 vs. SEC #3)
5:00pm ESPN Liberty Bowl (Academy team vs. to be announced)
01/01: 8:00am ESPN Hall Of Fame Bowl (teams to be announced)
10:00am NBC Cotton Bowl (SWC #1 vs. Coalition 1)
10:00am ABC Citrus Bowl (Big Ten #2 vs. SEC #2)
10:30am CBS Blockbuster Bowl (Penn State vs. Coalition 2)
1:30pm NBC Fiesta Bowl (Coalition 1 vs. Coalition 1)
2:00pm ABC Rose Bowl (Big Ten #1 vs. Pac-10 #1)
5:00pm NBC Orange Bowl (Big 8 #1 vs. Coalition 1)
5:30pm ABC Sugar Bowl (SEC #1 vs. Coalition 1)
01/02: 5:00pm ESPN Peach Bowl (ACC #3 vs. to be announced)
01/09: 7:00pm ESPN Japan Bowl
01/16: 11:00am ESPN Senior Bowl
01/24: 1:00pm ESPN East-West Shrine Classic
--
Chris Stassen 408-943-0630 [email protected]
|
18.577 | Grant out for the Season? | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Sep 02 1992 14:43 | 8 |
|
I was listening to the Dave logan radio question and answer show and
heard Dave say that Grant got hurt in practice yesterday and broke a
shoulder bone and will be out for the season. Anybody else here
anything?
Drewski
|
18.578 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Sep 02 1992 15:26 | 4 |
| Yea I heard that too, except I don't recall it being for the season.
Nothing in the paper about it today...
Joe
|
18.579 | Who's ? Who's Backup? for NU | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Sep 02 1992 15:45 | 5 |
|
Who's the backup for grant and who's his Backup????
Drewski
|
18.580 | New News to me... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:23 | 17 |
| I have not heard about his. I'm attempting to contact the guys in Omaha Field
Service (the ones that are STILL there) to confirm. I have also heard nothing
on the Usenet about it either.
If it's true - my understanding of the QB depth chart is that Tommy Frazier
is currently 3rd and some relatively unknown senior is second since Veland
went down with a broken colar bone. This would mean that Nebraska is down
to it's 3rd team QB. The Washington D must be licking their chops.
If this is true then it does not supprise me. Grant has been very injury prone
thoughout his career at Nebraska. As much as I don't like him at QB I must say
that it makes me feel sorry for the kid. His college career has gone to pieces
and he won't play in the NFL. He better be getting his education!
I'll post when I hear confirmation.
Husker Henderson
|
18.581 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | I need a bambulance | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:43 | 4 |
| Washington opens up against an ASU team starting their preseason #4 QB.
They seem to be getting some breaks early.
Brews
|
18.582 | Good start for the Sooners... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:33 | 15 |
|
The Okes looked pretty good last night against a fairly competitive
Texas Tech team. Cale Gundy finished up at 22-26, 341 yards, breaking
the Oklahoma single-game passing record for the second game in a row
(he broke this record first in last year's Gator Bowl).
Oklahoma has lots of experienced talent on the offense that Big-8
opponents had better be ready for. I can see that defense being
shredded by the likes of Nebraska's big backs, though (I still have
nightmares about that Calvin Jones kid). It'll be interesting, but
between USC, Texas, Colorado, and Nebraska there's probably going to be
two losses in there.
glenn
|
18.583 | | CAMONE::WAY | Feed My Frankenstein | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:45 | 9 |
| Glenn,
Who was the big TE for OU. Huge guy at 6'5", 269.....
Looked purty good to me...
'Saw
|
18.584 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:00 | 9 |
|
> Who was the big TE for OU. Huge guy at 6'5", 269.....
Joey Mickey. Awesome specimen. Pulled some balls in in tight
coverage, too. Who's going to argue with him? It's like trying to
stop Charles Barkley in traffic...
glenn
|
18.585 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:04 | 25 |
| Well, it appears that the Gator Bowl was a definite indication of what
the Sooners will be doing this year, and doing it with success. I sure
was impressed with Gundy - he threaded the needle a few times with
success. If that OL can just give him the protection they look potent.
I hope CU's new offense can be nearly that successful this season, but
I'm afraid it's gonna take some time.
Rasheed sure is a load - kind of like an Okoye with some moves. And
like Saw said, that TE is a monster. When they first mentioned the 274
pounds, I thought they were talking about the guy who tackled him!
Even though they only gave up 1 TD, the OU offense looked pretty porous
in the first half. But the announcers brought up a good point late in
the game saying how their defense has shown some maturation just in
this game. They've got a couple good outside 'backers in Barnes and
the other guy - was it Beavers?
I agree that this is a pretty decent Tech team. They're expected to
finish right up there in the SWC behind A&M, who should run away with
the SWC title. I felt kind of bad for Hall, the Tech QB. He had quite
a few passes dropped and ended up having to scramble alot. I was
pretty impressed with him though.
Joe
|
18.586 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:34 | 6 |
| I was impressed with 2 TT guys, one was their strong safety and one
of their RB's. The SS reminded me alot of Dennis Smith and Ronnie
Lott. Big hitters and play makers. The RB kinda looked like Zonka
(sp? way off) at times. The guy was big and ran over people.
Tim
|
18.587 | Can Sooner Scooner's fly ? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:30 | 14 |
| Well, I've done my share of Sooner bashing in this notes file so I guess
I should step up and say the Sooner's looked real good last night. Gundy
was playing like he wants to be drafted in the NFL's 1st round and the
defense was definately better than I expected. I only watched the first half,
does anybody know the final score ?
Gundy won't find it quite so easy against NU, CU and Texas but it looks like
all of those teams will have a tougher time stopping Gundy this year than
they did last year.
BTW, was that tight end Eric Green's little brother ? He sure played like
him. You can bet he'll be All-Big 8 at the end of the year.
Keith_who's_A_little_more_scared_about_the_Buff/Sooner_game_at_Folsom_field
|
18.588 | Final score: 34-9 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:43 | 1 |
|
|
18.589 | Another wonder bit of info from KOA, Denver | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:50 | 5 |
| Looks like another Dave Logan blooper. He is, uhum, full of them.
Mike Grant is not hurt and will be the Husker starting QB Saturday.
Husker Henderson
|
18.590 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 08 1992 11:00 | 46 |
| Keith Woestehoff and I attended the CU-CSU game on an absolutely gorgeous late
summer afternoon and witnessed the fairly successful regular-season debut of
the new CU offense. While the defense was expected to excel and the offense
was expected to struggle in the early part of the season, it was pretty much
the other way around in a 37-17 CU victory. Stewart passed for a CU-record
409 yards while the defense gave up 267 rushing yards.
In the weakness/problem department, 3 major things stuck out to me:
1. CU's inability to finish things off when they got near the goal line. On
five different trips inside the CSU 20-yard line, CU ended up with 3 field
goals, a missed field goal, and an intercepted pass in the end zone.
2. The rushing defense. This defense is projected to be one of the top 5
in the nation, but you wouldn't think so by the way they played Saturday.
That's the most yards rushing CU's given up since 1988, but that was against
Nebraska and not an outmanned opponent as CSU was.
3. Offensive line. Stewart was sacked 3 times and the running game was only
average.
Stewart was pretty impressive. He has a hell of an arm, and when he needs to
scramble or take off running he does a great job, which is no surprise since
he was recruited as an option quarterback.
Receivers Michael Westbrook and Charles Johnson were terrific, combining for
11 catches, 3 TD's, and nearly 300 yards. Johnson outleaped a CSU defender
for a spectacular catch and then proceeded to weave his way through the
rest of the seconday for a touchdown - definitely the play of the day.
Next up for CU is Baylor down in Texas in the heat of the day where it's
expected to be well over 100 degrees down on the playing field. Even though
Baylor lost to Louisiana Tech, I'm still a little worried about this one.
If CU wins this one, I think they'll finish the nonconference schedule
undefeated.
Every else in the Big 8 won except Missouri, who didn't play. Nebraska
racked up some big rushing yardage in a blowout over Utah and next week I
think they're playing Middle Tennessee State, but it'll be interesting to
see how they do against Washington in a couple weeks. Kansas had an
impressive win at Oregon State.
Joe
|
18.591 | Husker Notes 7-Sep-92 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Tue Sep 08 1992 11:49 | 125 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 7-SEP-1992 00:09:46.87
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Nebraska 49, Utah 22
Nebraska 49, Utah 22
Well, a few questions were answered convincingly at Memorial Stadium in
Lincoln: Mike Grant deserves the starting QB job, Derek Brown and Keith
Jones are a 'pick-em' as starting I-back, Lance Lewis is another in the
continuing series of excellent Husker fullbacks, and Johnny Mitchell
won't be missed as much as he might have thought. (Of course, after
William Washington gets to keep a TD reception he'll be happier. He
dropped one and had another called back on a penalty.)
However, a few questions were left very much up in the air: Who is the
backup QB, what will happen when they go up against their designated
Florida Bowl Opponent Passing Machine, and does the defense even HAVE
a 2nd string team?
76,234 red-clad fans (Utah's colors also include red) extended Nebraska's
NCAA record sell-out streak to 183 consecutive games. Next week's game
against 1-AA Middle Tennessee State is also expected to be a sell-out, thanks
in part to one of the local gas/convenience chains, which is offering free
tickets to their 'Junior Husker Club' members. (The basketball game against
Appalachian State on Dec 19th will be similarly attended.)
A 35-0 first half was followed by a 14-22 second half, and nobody will accuse
Dr. Tom of running up the score to try to beat the spread. The 2nd half
was very ragged, in part because both the offense and defense were a
mixture of first and second string players, then second and third, then
third and ???. The crowd was silent, and even the Wave didn't appear much
in the second half, in part because the student section (what there is
left of it--student sales were less than 8000 this year) emptied out after
halftime.
The officials also seemed to be lethargic in the second half, and made
some calls that were confused, at best. Fortunately, the outcome of the
game wasn't in doubt. Maybe this was the Big Eight Conference's way of
arranging for on-the-job training for new officials?
Backup QB Joel Cornwell was unimpressive, but also has been suffering from
a sore shoulder, and only played a few downs. True freshman Tommie Frazier
got in a couple of series, which answered the question whether he would be
red-shirted but little else. (Tom was heard to say on Friday that he was
worried that after he took Grant out of the game his QB's might try to call
plays that aren't even in the Nebraska playbook!)
Scoring and stats:
Utah 0 0 14 8 -- 22
Nebraska 21 14 7 7 -- 49
NU - Lewis, 57 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - D. Brown, 26 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Grant, 16 yard run (Bennett kick) [Mike Grant's first TD as a Husker]
NU - McDuffy, 6 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - C. Jones, 14 yard pass from Grant (Bennett kick)
NU - Grant, 6 yard run (Bennett kick)
Utah - Lusk, 7 yard pass from Dolce (pass failed)
Utah - Williams, 54 yard run (P. Jones run)
NU - Armstrong, 11 yard pass from Grant (Sieler kick)
Utah - P. Jones, 25 yard run (P. Jones run)
Attendance 76,234
Utah Nebraska
First downs 16 24
Rushes-yards 36-175 47-399
Passing yards 207 118
Total yards 382 517
Return yards -4 53
Passing 21-38-4 13-26-1
Punts 7-38.1 5-43.2
Fumbles-lost 1-1 3-1
Penalties-yards 4-21 9-60
Time of possession 31:27 28:33
Third-down conversions 4-15 6-14
Fourth-down conversions 2-2 1-2
Rushing, NU: D. Brown 15-105, C. Jones 11-92, Lewis 6-85, Grant 5-63,
Hawkins 1-15, Schlesinger 2-14, Frazier 2-14, McDuffy 1-6,
Mackovicka 1-4, Fiala 1-4, Cornwell 1-0, Berringer 1-(-3)
Rushing, Utah: K. Williams 15-106, P. Jones 8-42, Abrams 4-17,
J. Anderson 3-8, Hooks 1-7, Dolce 5-(-8)
Passing, NU: Grant 23-12-114-1, Cornwell 2-1-4-0, Frazier 1-0-0-0
Passing, Utah: Dolce, 38-21-2-7-4
Receiving, NU: Dixon 3-40, Muhammad 2-19, Hughes 2-15, Bell 2-9,
C. Jones 1-14, Armstrong 1-11, Hawkins 1-6, Washington 1-4
Receiving, Utah: Lusk 5-58, Hooks, 3-57, J. Anderson 3-15, S. Murry 2-23,
P. Jones 2-14, K. Williams 2-17, S. Williams 1-9,
Hoffman, 1-7, Abrams 1-5, Rowley 1-2
Kickoff Returns, NU: Hughes 2-48, Dixon 2-40
Kickoff Returns, Utah: Rowley 2-40, P. Jones 1-23, K. Williams 1-11
Interception Returns, NU: Reece, 2-12, Byrd 1-0, Carmer 1-0
Interception Returns, Utah: Swanson 1-0
Punt Returns, NU: Hughes 2-29, Dixon 1-12
Punt Returns, Utah: Williams 2-2, Rowley, 1-(-8)
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
For information on the Huskers mailing list, send e-mail to:
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA07037; Sun, 6 Sep 92 23:10:41 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Sun, 6 Sep 92 18:25:28 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA29395; Mon, 7 Sep 92 01:11:04 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Sep 92 00:43 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 00:43 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Nebraska 49, Utah 22
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.592 | Buffalo Wings | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Sep 08 1992 12:59 | 45 |
| It's really incredible how fast the media can change it's tune.
All summer long, all the media talked about was the future of CU with
Koy Detmer as the QB. Rarely did the TV, papers or national magazines
have anything to say about Kordell Stewart. One national magazine even
said CU would have to start Detmer because Stewart and Joseph were incapable
of running a passing attack. The day before the game, a Co Springs
Gazette Telegraph columnist was blasting Coach McCartney for picking Kordell
Stewart to start.
Well guess what happened, true sophmore Stewart, who only saw mop up duty in
the past, threw for 409 yards and 4 TDs, a school record. When you threw in
his running, he also set a new school record for most combined yards. Not
bad for his first start. On Sunday, the papers were saying things like
"Darian who ?" and "Stewart Stadium". They were acting like Stewart is the
second coming of, gag, "John Elway". My oh my, how fast things change.
For people who didn't see the game, they may say that these stats came
against a lowly ranked CSU. And I agree that things will certainly be tougher
against teams like OU, Iowa and NU. But when you watch the tape of the
game it is obvious that Stewart is a truely talented QB. On his first TD,
he was being blitzed and while back pedaling and nearly falling backwards,
he threw a 48 yard TD strike to Michael Westbrook. Later in the game, he
threw a 60 yard bomb to Charles Johnson which was as pretty as any pass
I have ever seen. Once he gets the experience of running a passing attack,
he could be a great college QB.
One other pleasant surprise was the play of Charles Johnson who had 4
catches for 159 yards(almost 40 yd/catch average). We all knew that Michael
Westbrook would be a dangerous receiver but now with Johnson coming into
his own, other teams won't be able to just key on Westbrook.
Joe and I didn't have the best seats in the world for this game(end zone
in front of the Dall Ward center) but we did have excellent seats for the
most impressive play of the day. This was when Charles Johnson leaped over
a defender to grab a pass, somehow kept his balance and then made an excellent
run for a TD. From our vantage point, the play was even more impressive
than the TV replays and it was really neat to watch Johnson and the would
be tacklers racing right towards us for the TD. It was great watching the
live action for a change.
As Joe pointed out, the game did expose some serious CU problems. I hope
they can correct them before the Baylor game.
Keith
|
18.593 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 08 1992 13:33 | 7 |
|
This isn't the Charles Johnson who QB'd the Buffs to the Orange Bowl
victory (and a share of the Mythical) in 1990, is it? The one who
courageously quit football to concentrate on his studies?
glenn
|
18.594 | No, he's a different one, Glenn | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 08 1992 14:07 | 1 |
|
|
18.595 | Special K | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Sep 09 1992 12:30 | 3 |
| Yesterday, Kordell Stewart was named Big 8 player of the week.
Keith
|
18.596 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:49 | 22 |
| The CU/Baylor game made for great highlight films for both teams as the
final score more resembled basketball than football. Kordell Stewart
again showed why he is a future superstar as he completed 13 passes in a row
for another school record. At the pace he is going, he will not only break
but shatter all CU passing records. The record number of TD's thrown in a
season is 12. Stewart has 7 while only playing 6 quarters. He severely
sprained his ankle near the end of the 1st half. He may not be able to
play next week. CU also took a big hit when nose tackle, Jeff Bruner, ruptured
his cruciate ligament. He may be out for the season.
4th string QB, Duke Tobin, played the entire 2nd half and did a good job
except for one pass interception which went for a TD.
Last week the Buffs couldn't stop the run but did contain the pass. This week,
Baylor couldn't run at all against the Buffs but they did connect on 4
long pass plays. The defense still needs some fine tuning.
KCNC hasn't said anything about televising next week's game against Minnesota
and my TV guide doesn't have the game listed. Does anyone know if the game
will apear on any of the Sports channels ?
Keith
|
18.597 | CU 57, Baylor 38 | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Mon Sep 14 1992 14:45 | 29 |
| CU is now a somewhat-as-expected 2-0, but they sure haven't done it as
expected. The offense is looking like Miami's, but the defense is looking
like something out of the WAC. Actually, the defense played great the first
28 minutes of the first half, but then fell asleep as Baylor scored TD's on
their next 3 possessions, 2 of which came on long bombs. The Buffs had a
stretch where they were outscored 21-3 as their lead went from 33-3 to 36-24,
and what was once a potentially huge blowout was now a shootout. But I'll
be optimistic and say that the defense relaxed mentally and lost their focus
when CU went up 33-3 after exploding for 26 2nd-quarter points.
Stewart sprained his foot and Tobin had to come in and did a decent job, but
I wouldn't want him as the starter. Stewart is doing an incredible job - he
has a great arm, does a good job of avoiding the blitz, and is an excellent
runner.
CU's running game didn't do much again, but Baylor was stacking the line as if
CU was nothing but a running team. I don't understand why Baylor was playing
that kind of defense.
Westbrook had another big day (11 catches) and is now the leading receiver in
the nation in both catches and yards. Charles Johnson had another great
leaping catch, again outleaping a defender for a touchdown.
True, CU's competition hasn't been the greatest, but by the time the OU and NU
games come around the Buffs should definitely be ready. Next up is 2 games
against Big 10 teams - at Minnesota this Saturday night and Iowa in Boulder the
following Saturday.
|
18.598 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Mon Sep 14 1992 15:11 | 12 |
|
> KCNC hasn't said anything about televising next week's game against Minnesota
> and my TV guide doesn't have the game listed. Does anyone know if the game
> will apear on any of the Sports channels ?
I looked and didn't see it on anywhere, either, but that's okay because
it shouldn't be much of a game anyway. Besides, there's a great lineup
of games on Saturday: USC-Oklahoma, ND-Michigan State, Ohio State at
Syracuse, and then Nebraska-Washington. Over 12 straight hours of
football - heck, that's as good as New Year's Day.
Joe
|
18.599 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Sep 14 1992 17:16 | 15 |
| > Besides, there's a great lineup
> of games on Saturday: USC-Oklahoma, ND-Michigan State, Ohio State at
> Syracuse, and then Nebraska-Washington.
Yer right, there's some great games on but I'll still be listening to KOA
to see what CU passin records are broken this week. I heard that if Stewart
continues at the present pace, he'll break all of Hagan's single season
passing records before they even start their Big 8 games.
I think OU will beat USC setting up a great battle (or should we say "air
show") of the unbeatens in Folsom Field on Oct 17. And if Washington plays
like they did against Wisconsin, the Huskers might just pull off the upset
of the week.
Keith
|
18.600 | Go Big Red!!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:17 | 1 |
| What's the line on HuskERS at HuskIES?
|
18.601 | | FDCV06::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Tue Sep 15 1992 13:40 | 6 |
| Huskies giving 7 to the Huskers...
REK
Sure bet of the week.... Take the Husk...... Gee did it ever get quiet
in here...
|
18.602 | Stewart, Joseph still hurting | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:22 | 8 |
| There's a good chance that Stewart might not be recovered from his
sprained foot by Saturday and if that's the case Duke Tobin will get
the start. Since Joseph's arm is still sore, that would leave Detmer
as the #2 QB. So if Tobin starts and is having a bad game or gets hurt
then they would have to put in Detmer, eliminating the possibility of
redshirting him.
Joe
|
18.603 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Sep 15 1992 19:21 | 22 |
| If they do play Detmer, could they redshirt him next year ?
Darius Holland has been named to replace seriously injured Jeff Brunner
at nose tackle. They were trying to redshirt him but I remember him playing
last year. True freshman Shannon Clavelle will be Holland's backup. Sam
Rogers who was backing up Brunner has been moved to tackle. I get the
impression that the Brunner injury is a big hit on the Buffs.
Today's RMN reported that a survey of sports writer's shows Kordell Stewart
in 5th place in the Heisman race.
On ESPN, they had college football expert Beano ?(is it Cook ?) name his
top 5 teams. I couldn't believe it when he listed CU as 3rd after Miami and
Washington. Florida and Florida State were his next 2 picks. Evidently
Stewart, Westbrook and company have gotten some people's attention outside
of Colorado.
I think if Tobin goes down, they could play Lamont Warren at QB and still
beat Minnesota. But I don't want to find out. Let's hope Tobin stays healthy
and Stewart recovers soon.
Keith
|
18.604 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 11:55 | 8 |
| > If they do play Detmer, could they redshirt him next year ?
No.
Also, I heard on the radio last night that channel 4 is not carrying the game.
Joe
|
18.605 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:07 | 13 |
|
Has anybody shelled out any bucks for this ABC college football
pay-per-view thing? Is it widely available? My backwater cable system
has no pay-per-view capabilities of any kind, and I had been thinking
about buying the Oklahoma-USC regional telecast this Saturday. (Around
here it's automatic Notre Dame, even though they're on NBC every other
week anyway. No offense, ND fans; affiliate response to TV ratings is
pretty much democracy in action). It's moot for me at this point, but
I'm expecting scouting reports from you guys out west... ;-)
glenn
|
18.606 | | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:27 | 5 |
|
Why not Joe? I thought you could redshirt at any time. In
other words, you've got 5 years to play 4......
Claybone
|
18.607 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:38 | 16 |
| I bought the Texas-Syracuse game last week instead of watching the
wonderful Missouri-Illinois matchup we were stuck with this past
Saturday. Cost was $8.95, which I think is a little expensive, but not
too expensive to stop me from ordering it :^). Plus I figured there's
a good chance that I probably won't want to order it again this season
because we'll end up getting the game I want to watch anyway. Like
this week we're getting USC-OU, which is the one I'd want out of the 3
being offered.
The Michigan St.-ND game is ABC's 2nd game and is a national game. The
first games are regional and are the ones being offered for
pay-per-view: Illinois-Houston, Florida-Tennessee, and USC-OU. I
think you're getting stuck with the Illinois game up in the Northeast area.
Joe
|
18.608 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:39 | 9 |
|
> Why not Joe? I thought you could redshirt at any time. In
> other words, you've got 5 years to play 4......
I think you have to redshirt in your first two years at school, except
in the case of injury.
glenn
|
18.609 | Husker Notes | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:42 | 99 |
|
Nebraska 48, Middle Tennessee State 7
The game that Tom Osborne had been dreading even more than the Washington
game nearly lived up to his worst fears. Despite running 43 plays in
the first half, the Huskers went into the locker room with a slim 14-7
lead. Although Osborne claims not to have said much at halftime, whatever
he said must have been enough, because the Huskers scored 14 points in
just 4 plays and 1:47 to start off the 3rd quarter. The defense put
up a goose egg in the 2nd half as well.
Lance Lewis ran off another long TD run, this time a 42 yard scamper after
a 23 yard Calvin Jones 'dive play'. (Some dive, eh?) Not to be outdone,
Derek Brown picked up 44 yards and a TD two plays into the next drive.
But for a few turnovers inside the Middle Tennessee State 20, the
Huskers could have put the ball in the end zone 5 times in the 3rd quarter,
instead of 'just' 3 times. The game was turned over to the mop-up squads
in the 4th quarter.
Osborne had called the game with NCAA 1-AA Middle Tennessee State (a late
replacement for Division 1-A powermouse Temple) a no-win proposition, and
the pollsters must have agreed, because Nebraska dropped one spot, swapping
places with Colorado in both polls this week. Although there were still
200 or so tickets left on Friday, the game was an official sellout, and
76,148 people actually showed up. (Of course, that many might have shown
up even if Middle Tennessee State had stayed home.) On his Sunday night
TV show, Osborne expressed his gratitude to the fans for the continued
sellouts at Nebraska.
Scoring and Stats:
Middle Tennessee State 0 7 0 0 - 7
Nebraska 7 7 20 14 - 48
NU - C. Jones, 2 yard run (Bennett kick)
MTSU - Parks, 61 yard pass from Holcomb (Petrilli kick)
NU - Grant, 15 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Lewis, 42 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - D. Brown, 44 yard run (run failed, bad snap)
NU - D. Brown, 4 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - McDuffy, 16 yard run (Sieler kick)
NU - Frazier, 3 yard run (Sieler kick) Frazier's first points at NU!!
MTSU NU
First downs 13 31
Rushes-yards 40-50 65-490
Passing yards 152 110
Total yards 202 600
Return yards 30 100
Passing 8-21-0 9-25-2
Punts 9-37.7 1-14.0
Fumbles-lost 6-2 2-1
Penalties-yards 6-52 7-59
Time of possession 28:20 31:40
Third-down conversions 2-14 5-11
Fourth-down conversions 0-0 1-4
Rushing, NU: D. Brown 14-154, C. Jones 16-119, Grant 10-68, Lewis 5-59,
McDuffy 6-34, Frazier 6-16, Fiala 2-12, Mackovicka 3-12,
Schlesinger 1-6, Cornwell 2-5, McMillen 1-5
MTSU: Dunson 14-61, Lyons 5-22, Bayless 6-18, Crowder 3-7,
Montgomery 1-3, Dirkson 1-(-4), Murphy, 2-(-11),
Holcomb 8-(-46)
Passing, NU: Grant 16-7-87-1, Frazier 5-2-23-0, Cornwell 2-0-0-1,
Berringer, 2-0-0-0
MTSU: Holcomb 21-8-152-0
Receiving, NU: Bell 3-32, Muhammad 2-31, Hawkins 2-13, D. Brown 1-20,
Seizys 1-14
MTSU: Parks 5-111, Dark 1-24, Watkins 1-14, Bayless 1-3
Punting, NU: Stigge, 1-14
MTSU: Sylvester 6-244 (40.7), Alsobrook 3-93 (31.7)
Punt returns, NU: Hughes 2-63, Dixon 1-26, Miles 1-9
Kickoff returns, NU: Hughes 1-35
MTSU: Simpson 3-85
Interception returns, MTSU: Huggins 1-27, Caldwell 1-3
The NU-Washington game will be on ESPN, kickoff has been moved back
to 8:45 PM CDT.
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AB25090; Wed, 16 Sep 92 01:23:51 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Tue, 15 Sep 92 20:38:35 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA23571; Wed, 16 Sep 92 03:24:12 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Sep 92 02:18 CDT
% Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 01:16:31 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% Message-Id: <9209160616.AA23140@helios>
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Nebraska 48, Middle Tennessee State 7
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.610 | Thanks Joe... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:43 | 13 |
|
> The Michigan St.-ND game is ABC's 2nd game and is a national game. The
> first games are regional and are the ones being offered for
> pay-per-view: Illinois-Houston, Florida-Tennessee, and USC-OU. I
> think you're getting stuck with the Illinois game up in the Northeast
> area.
Okay, gotcha. I think I know what's going on now. We get the "Big
Least Game of the Week" up here at noon on the ABC affiliate. Now I'm
steamed...
glenn
|
18.611 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 12:48 | 8 |
| RE: redshirting
I thought you could redshirt any year, but Glenn's probably right, that
you can only redshirt during the last 3 years if it's due to injury.
A player can only redshirt if he DOES NOT play at all during a season,
so if Detmer plays against Minnesota it would cost him a year of
eligibility (i.e. he couldn't redshirt this year).
Joe
|
18.612 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:00 | 13 |
|
> Okay, gotcha. I think I know what's going on now. We get the "Big
> Least Game of the Week" up here at noon on the ABC affiliate. Now I'm
> steamed...
That's what happened to us last week. We got Missouri-Illinois because
Missouri's in the Big 8 but what teed me off is why that game was even
selected as a regional game.
I'm surprised your cable company doesn't offer pay-per-view...
Joe
|
18.613 | Wht's a mux | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:08 | 8 |
| Dontchya know Joe,
Glenn's situated up theyah in New Hampshayuh, ayuh. He's durn lucky
they gots a long enough cable to reach his abode wif Channel 11
from Durham.
8^)'s
MikeL
|
18.614 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:25 | 2 |
| They still have steam powered TVs in Cow Hampshire!
Denny
|
18.615 | Ayup | MKFSA::LONG | Carpe diem. | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:29 | 4 |
| Actually they are cow chip powered!
Bill
|
18.616 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:47 | 5 |
| As far as I know you can redshirt any time during the 5 years for any
reason. In most cases reshirting does take place during the first year
in school.
John
|
18.617 | Husker Notes | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:06 | 65 |
| Freshman QB Tommie Frazier has moved up to 2nd place on the latest depth
chart. Osborne said that Frazier graded the highest of any NU quarterback
in Saturday's win over Middle Tennessee State, and that he wouldn't
be afraid to use Frazier at Washington.
Washington coach Don James has asked for a 'noisy crowd' this Saturday, citing
Osborne's request for an enthusiastic crowd in Lincoln last year. Osborne
doesn't think that crowd noise will be much of a factor.
Seen outside a Lincoln supermarket:
Dan Quayle sez:
Nebraske 69 Washingtone 0
NU depth chart:
Offense
Split end: Tyrone Hughes, Corey Dixon, Trumane Bell
Left tackle: Lance Lundberg, Rob Zatechka, Dave Jensen
Left guard: Ken Mehlin, Chris Zyzda, Joel Wilks
Center: Jim Scott, Terris Chorney, Aaron Graham
Right guard: Will Shields, T.J. Slansky, Brenden Stal
Right tackle: Zach Wiegert, Rob Zatechka, Joel Gesky
Tight end: William Washington, Gerald Armstrong, Mike Vedral
Quarterback: Mike Grant, Tommie Frazier, Joel Cornwell, Brook Berringer
Fullback: Lance Lewis, Andre McDuffy, Cory Schlesinger, David Fiala
I-back: Derek Brown, Calvin Jones, Andre McDuffy
Wingback: Vincent Hawkins, Abdul Muhammad, David Seizys
Defense
Left outside Linebacker: Travis Hill, Donta Jones, David Leader-Lance Gray,
Dwayne Harris
Left tackle: John Parrella, Billy Wade, Matt Hilman
Middle guard: David Noonan, Terry Connealy, Bill Humphrey
Right tackle: Jamie Liewer, Bruce Moore, Kevin Ramaekers
Right outside linebacker: Trev Alberts-David White, Donta Jones
Strongside linebacker: Mike Anderson, Darren Williams-Troy Branch, Phil Ellis
Weakside linebacker: Ed Stewart, Matt Penland
Left cornerback: Kenny Wilhite, Mike Heins, Barron Miles
Right cornerback: John Reese, Lorenzo Brinkley, Kareem Moss
Strong safety: Steve Carmer, Zeke Cisco, Austin Wertz, Toby Wright
Free Safety: Tyrone Byrd, Troy Dumas, Sedric Collins
Specialists
Place-kicker: Byron Bennett, Tom Sieler
Punter: Mike Stigge, Byron Bennett
Punt returns: Corey Dixon-Tyrone Hughes, Baron Miles-Kareem Moss,
Damon Benning-Brent Popplewell
Kickoff returns: Tyrone Hughes-Corey Dixon, Kareem Moss-Barron Miles
Kickoff: Byron Bennett, Tom Sieler
Holder: Mike Stiggee, Joel Cornwell
Snapper: Aaron Graham, Jon Pedersen, Phil Ellis
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA08896; Wed, 16 Sep 92 15:27:08 -0700
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA15668; Wed, 16 Sep 92 11:09:08 -0400
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:07:49 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA24351; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:08:39 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:02 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:02 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Sep 16th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.618 | A Mistery... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:17 | 31 |
| I have an honest question for you CU fans out there.
Since I have moved to Colorado 3 years ago I have noticed something I do not
understand about CU fans in general and about the Colorado press. Perhaps you
guys/gals can shed some light on this.
I have noticed much more hostility toward Nebraska than toward Oklahoma.
Here is just one example:
Last night I was listening to KOA's sports call in show and many callers did
a lot of badmouthing of Nebraska. I mean real sour grapes type of stuff. Some
of the things they were saying I know for a fact were not true because I follow
Husker football. The main point is that there was nothing derogatory said about
OU but every 3rd call or so badmouthed NU. Dave Logan only fueled the fire.
Coach Mac just stayed silent. (He did say - to Dave Logan's objections - that
he is pulling for NU or Washinton and he thinks they have a good chance if
NU gets good QB play and a good Defensive game)
Now consider this: Untill the last few years OU pounded CU just as bad and for
just as many years as NU did. And in fact OU had more overall success than
Nebraska. Plus - OU has been on probation TWICE since the 70's and NU has been
on probation ZIP.
Now why do these people focus on NU so much and why are they so gracious toward
OU. I'm not saying the CU folks should be bitter toward OU. The only question I
have is why do they HATE NU when they have at least as much reason to "hate"
OU?
This is so illogical to me. Any explanations?
Husker Henderson
|
18.619 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:24 | 12 |
|
> Now why do these people focus on NU so much and why are they so gracious toward
> OU. I'm not saying the CU folks should be bitter toward OU. The only question I
> have is why do they HATE NU when they have at least as much reason to "hate"
> OU?
>
> This is so illogical to me. Any explanations?
NU rooters are more fanatical than OU fans, for one thing...
glenn
|
18.620 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:30 | 11 |
| It's official that Stewart won't play this SAturday - he won't even
make the trip to Minnesota. Tobin will start.
I'm really looking forward to the Wash-NU game. Washington hasn't been
that impressive score-wise; it seems like they should've beat Wisconsin
by a helluva lot more than 17 points. If Washington can shut down the
powerful Husker ground game it could be a long night for Nebraska.
This should be Washington's toughest game of the year.
Joe
|
18.621 | Husker Notes Sept. 17th | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:44 | 45 |
| Tickets for the NU-Washington game are scarce, at least one tour group going
out from Nebraska may wind up having to watch the game on ESPN. The other day
prices of $150 or more were being quoted, they've probably gone up since then.
'Restricted view' tickets are going for $100.
Washington only allocated 2500 tickets to Nebraska (the normal Big Eight
alottment is 4000), and the NU ticket office had requests for 9000 tickets.
Things aren't much better for the Huskies fans, either. All but 6500 of the
72,500 seats in the stadium are reserved for season ticket holders, but this
is the only Washington game that is currently a sellout. Washington held
a lottery last spring to accomodate the flood of ticket requests for this
game.
Nebraska may be a 7 1/2 point underdog in Las Vegas, but AP writer Rick Warner
has picked NU to defeat Washington 27-24, citing the Cornhuskers dynamic
backfield duo, an improved defense for NU, and a graduation-weakened Huskies
defense. Last year the Huskies held rushers to under 100 yards in every
game except Nebraska, where Derek Brown had 100 even. This year, Arizona
State's Mario Bates gained 214 yards in 19 carries. In '91, Washington
allowed 1.9 yards per carry and 67.1 per game. So far this year, they are
allowing 4.9 per rush and 182.5 per game. Nebraska's rushing offense is
currently ranked #1 in the nation, and Huskies Coach Don James is worried.
Former Husker Danny Noonan, released by Dallas earlier this week, has signed
with Green Bay.
Scott Baldwin, the former NU I-back who was shot and paralyzed at midwaist
by an Omaha policewoman during a scuffle on September 5th, does not have
health insurance. St. Joseph's Hospital will submit bills for Baldwin's care
to the city of Omaha, in the hopes that they will pick up part of the tab.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA26380; Thu, 17 Sep 92 08:06:47 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Thu, 17 Sep 92 10:06:12 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA00590; Thu, 17 Sep 92 10:07:03 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Sep 92 10:01 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Thu, 17 Sep 92 10:01 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: husker notes, Sep 17th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.622 | The ghost of Sal Aunese | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Sep 17 1992 12:57 | 14 |
| > Now why do these people focus on NU so much and why are they so gracious toward
> OU. I'm not saying the CU folks should be bitter toward OU. The only question I
> have is why do they HATE NU when they have at least as much reason to "hate"
> OU?
>
> This is so illogical to me. Any explanations?
I think a lot of these feelings toward the Huskers go back to the game
in 1989 when the Nebraska press and fans where saying things like "the best
team didn't win the game" or "CU only won because MacCartey hyped the
Sal Aunese death". The CU-NU relationship really hasn't been the same since
that game.
Keith
|
18.623 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Sep 17 1992 13:04 | 11 |
| >It's official that Stewart won't play this SAturday - he won't even
>make the trip to Minnesota. Tobin will start.
There's a good chance Stewart won't play in the Iowa game either. If that
turns out to be true, I'll bet that Detmer will see action against Iowa.
I can't wait for the OU-USC and NU-Wash games this weekend. I hope both
OU and NU win so that there will be at least 2 games in the big 8 where the
teams are undefeated.
Keith
|
18.624 | Nebraska billboard: Sal is dead. Go Big Red | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Thu Sep 17 1992 14:47 | 5 |
|
You really wanna know Marty? Take a look at some of the
replies you've entered..........
Claybone
|
18.625 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 17 1992 17:45 | 35 |
| >> Now why do these people focus on NU so much and why are they so gracious toward
>> OU. I'm not saying the CU folks should be bitter toward OU. The only question I
>> have is why do they HATE NU when they have at least as much reason to "hate"
>> OU?
>>
>> This is so illogical to me. Any explanations?
> I think a lot of these feelings toward the Huskers go back to the game
> in 1989 when the Nebraska press and fans where saying things like "the best
> team didn't win the game" or "CU only won because MacCartey hyped the
> Sal Aunese death". The CU-NU relationship really hasn't been the same since
> that game.
> Keith
I'll agree that the 'SAL' thing did add fuel to the fire, however I have
observed the 'bitterness' in existence before that game/situation happened.
Besides, both sides have a beef toward the other about the 'SAL' thing and
neither side will EVER understand the other viewpoint. Plus that was 3 years
ago and CU got the win. So why hold onto it?
> You really wanna know Marty? Take a look at some of the
> replies you've entered..........
> Claybone
Claybone, your type would be offended by just about ANYTHING any Nebraska
fan says which is contrary to your thinking which has been sculptured by
your tunnel vision. You have not even noticed that the tone of my posts has
changed drastically.
Are you one of those geeks who calls into KOA with incorrect Nebraska data
and spews out all kinds of trash?
Husker Henderson
|
18.626 | exit | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Thu Sep 17 1992 18:13 | 34 |
| Marty
>I'll agree that the 'SAL' thing did add fuel to the fire, however I have
>observed the 'bitterness' in existence before that game/situation happened.
>Besides, both sides have a beef toward the other about the 'SAL' thing and
>neither side will EVER understand the other viewpoint. Plus that was 3 years
>ago and CU got the win. So why hold onto it?
Well, prior to the "SAL thing", McCartney targeted NU to have
a rivalry with. I would guess because he saw them as a program
he would want to be like. Who knows. CU really never had a
rival prior to that (unless you go way back to the old days
when the CU vs Colo. St. games meant something). He probably
singled them out because of their consistent succes.
>Claybone, your type would be offended by just about ANYTHING any Nebraska
>fan says which is contrary to your thinking which has been sculptured by
>your tunnel vision. You have not even noticed that the tone of my posts has
>changed drastically.
You don't even know me Holmes. Don't try to predict anything
about me til you do.
I've noticed that you've toned it down. Should I forget the
"EAT YOU KNOW WHAT ALL YOU CU FANS" comments? Have you turned
over a new leaf?
>Are you one of those geeks who calls into KOA with incorrect Nebraska data
>and spews out all kinds of trash?
Say no more. I guess not.......
Claybone
|
18.627 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Running With The Devil (dog) | Thu Sep 17 1992 18:42 | 7 |
| Marty, I ain't even a CU fan, but all your "Sal factor" talk got real
old, and them conversations were just in passing. Personally I hate NU
because I spent a year in Nebraska at hastings College and all the "GO
Big Red" crap just got to me. Don't worry you didn't wreck NU for me as
I had quite a few friends on campus there. Fan fanaticism is the same
everywhere you go, either you got it, or you can't stand those that do.
I didn't have it for Nebraska. Never did, never will.
|
18.628 | Just 2 months till the kickoff in Lincoln | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Sep 17 1992 19:11 | 32 |
| Well, from the sound of the last few replies, it looks like the pre-game
hype has already started for the 1992 CU-NU game at Lincoln.
Marty, for most of my life as a college football fan, the one team I wanted
to see lose the most was Oklahoma. I just didn't like Barry Switzer's
gung ho attitude and all the recruiting violations and problems associated
with OU football. I always looked forward to the NU-OU game and always
pulled for the Huskers to win. Well, Switzer is long gone, OU is finished
with it's probation and they have a new coach who seems to be running a
honest football program while still turning out a quality team. I just don't
have the same feelings toward OU that I once did. But I'd still say that of
all the college football teams that I'd like to see CU beat, OU is still
near the top of the list but NU is higher.
I just never understood why anyone or the fans of another team would be
upset with a team dedicating it's season to terminally ill teammate. I
think that the show of love generated by the team was something that will
always be appreciated by the Aunese family. After the 1989 game, some
people were saying that the only reason, why CU won, was because the players
were so hyped because of the "Sal Aunese thing". I don't buy that for one
minute. The NU players were certainly sky going into that game and wanted to
win the Big 8 championship just as must as CU. As someone said about 400
replies ago, "they weren't ghosts out there playin for CU, they were real
people."
With all that said, I still think that NU football has been one of the
greatest college football programs ever assembled. And, they've maintained
it over many decades. And, they probably have the most enthusiastic fans
of any college football team. I'll be rootin for the Huskers to win
every game they play this year, except one.
Keith
|
18.629 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:22 | 42 |
| Dedicating a season to a fallen teammate is fine, but the perception
from the outside can turn to a team overdoing it very quickly.
For example, in 1978, Jim Gilliam, who'd been a long time player and
then a coach for the Dodgers, died just before they played the Yankees
in the World Series. In the first two games, which the Dodgers won,
whenever the Dodgers did something good, they pointed to the sky. To
the Dodgers, it was like they were saying "this one's for you, Jim."
To the Yankees, it was like the Dodgers were saying "we're number 1."
It was one of the motivating factors in the Yanks sweeping the next 4
games.
To me, 2000 miles away, I felt Colorado went a little bit too far in
paying tribute to Sal Aunese. I'm not saying it was wrong to honor him
and I'm not saying he wasn't worthy of being honored. All I'm saying
is that it looked to this outsider like it was a bit much.
You all know I hate Boston College. One of their starting players, Jay
McGillis, was diagnosed with leukemia during the 1991 season and died
this summer. I would be looking really hard to see any signs of Boston
College overdoing it. They are not. They are wearing a patch on their
jerseys and his number is being displayed on the scoreboard and that's
it. They are paying tribute to him in what to me is a very tasteful
fashion. The Yankees continued to show a video tribute to Thurman
Munson for years and years after he died and that was way overdoing it
in my opinion.
I have seen Nebraska play once, in 1984 at Syracuse, a game that
Syracuse won. I found their team and their fans to be very classy and
friendly, even after a tough loss. Even so, when you're at the top for
a long time, the natural tendency is to become a target. I would
think, given the perception from the outside that Oklahoma would be a
more likely target in the Big 8 for fan hatred than Nebraska would be.
Again, I'm not in Big 8 country so I don't really know.
Finally, Marty, if you want to look at why you might be drawing fire
from the Colorado faithful, remember back to that note you posted after
last year's Nebraska - Colorado game. If that was typical of the
attitude of Nebraska fans then it's no mystery to me why Colorado
dislikes Nebraska.
John
|
18.630 | | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:19 | 9 |
|
John,
I can understand why you feel they overdid their tribute to
Sal. The media took that little gem and ran all the way to
the Orange Bowl with it that year. I don't know how many
times I said to myself, "Dick Enberg, SHUT UP!".
Claybone
|
18.631 | CU 4 IN A ROW | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:40 | 22 |
|
Marty, The reason CU fans Dislike or should I say love to beat NU
is very simple. NU has dominated The big 8 and been respected as
a class act college program since Divine.
So coach Mac who probably
knew OU's folly would catch it with them sooner then later Chose NU
as the Designated team to kick there but every year. So began the
rival. The CU fans never really had a rival outside the state. Then
When "THE SAL FACTOR" came into play the NU fans Totally Dis The CU
and it's Fans which added more fuel to the Fire. Granted the media
to full advantage of this and I believe only because CU was winning
games.
But this madness built CU into the Dominating Force in the Big 8 and
with this new pass offense I think CU fans can safely say CU will Be
around for years to come. And if just Half the NU fans act the way
you act marty then it's plain to see why the rival is so Heated up.
Just my Thoughts.........CU 4 in a row
Drewski
|
18.632 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:47 | 25 |
| Most of the hostility toward Nebraska stems from the fact that McCartney
designated the Huskers as CU's 'rival' when he came here in '81. CU didn't
have a real rivalry with anybody when Mac came here and being involved in all
those Michigan-Ohio State wars at Michigan he wanted to have something similar
at CU. It literally is CU's red-letter game on the schedule. Plus like
Glenn pointed out, the Nebraska fans are more intense than OU fans. Nebraska
is known for their tremendous road crowds they bring with them wherever they go.
And I read somewhere that there has only been a few sellouts over the past 5
or 6 seasons in Norman.
As for the Aunese deal, well it may seem like it was overblown to outsiders,
but much of that was due to the fact that CU was having a great year and was
in the national spotlight. They started the '89 season ranked 14th and opened
with a nationally televised Labor Day game with Texas and had another national
telecast against Illinois early in the season. And not only were they in the
national spotlight but were somewhat of a Cinderella story, having not been in
the top 10 since the early-mid 70's.
How many of you guys knew that Baylor had a player die in the '90 season and
they dedicated their season to him and enshrined his locker, much like CU did?
You didn't hear much about it because they weren't a nationally ranked team
and weren't on TV at all.
Joe
|
18.633 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:53 | 17 |
| Yes, I'd have to agree with Claybone, if it was overdone by anyone,
it was overdone by the media, especially the national TV media.
The local papers and local TV really didn't run it into the ground like
Dick Enberg and company.
BTW, this is the first year that Sal Aunese's number has been given to
a new player. Mac waited until all the people who played with Aunese
had left the team before issuing the number to a new player.
Marty, I can undertsand your feelings after listening to the KOA radio show
on Wed. I listened to that show also and thought that one of the call-ins
was kind of obnoxious concerning NU. But then again, there's always a few
jerks out there who go a little overboard. Let's hope the Huskers and Buffs
are both undefeated going into their game in Lincoln(just like 1989, except a
different stadium). It will make the game all that much more fun to watch.
Keith
|
18.634 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Fri Sep 18 1992 12:58 | 10 |
| There's some jerks who call in to KOA that can give CU fans in general a
bad name. But I'm sure if I went to Lincoln and listened to the talk
shows there it'd be the same in favor of NU...
I just thought of something - if NU can knock off Washington then
there's a very good chance that when Miami and FSU play next month it
will be #1 vs. #2 again.
Joe
|
18.635 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Huh? | Fri Sep 18 1992 14:25 | 1 |
| Joe I wouldn't count on NU beating Washington.
|
18.636 | Set your VCRs! You don't want to miss this one! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:23 | 15 |
|
> Glenn's situated up theyah in New Hampshayuh, ayuh. He's durn lucky
> they gots a long enough cable to reach his abode wif Channel 11
> from Durham.
This is true. However, I just saw where the NH ABC affiliate Channel
9 is picking up the Tennessee-Florida game; not the one I wanted, but
a good game nonetheless. This is in contrast to Channel 5 of that
bastion of technological sophistication, Boston, which even though BC
isn't on and they're under no contractual obligation to do so is
either too dumb or too lazy to throw a switch and instead is going to
go ahead with the mother of all ratings losers, Virginia Tech vs Temple.
glenn
|
18.637 | What's Sherrill castrating this week? | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:47 | 13 |
| Awright!
Beer bash at Glenn's house for UT-UF and ND-MSU.
Too bad ya got no dish fer NU-UDub and OU-USC
MikeL
And no child abuse when I'n thar Waugamain! Don't want to see you
using yo' po' kid's haid as a coaster!!
8^)
|
18.638 | Okay, go to JD's place then take a left... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 18 1992 17:09 | 8 |
|
> Awright!
> Beer bash at Glenn's house for UT-UF and ND-MSU.
Sure, beer's on me at my house if you can find it! ;-)
glenn
|
18.639 | The Pac-10 is still not to be taken lightly... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 10:44 | 19 |
|
Not a good day Saturday for the Sooners and the Big 8 in general.
Colorado won, but apparently they're continuing in last year's MO of
pulling out games in the final moments against vastly inferior
opponents. Still, that's better than losing, regardless of who you're
up against.
Initially, from the highlights, I was going to say that it looked
like OU choked away a big game on a fumble recovery for touchdown
for the second straight year, but the box score says that USC
flat-out all-around outplayed Oklahoma. Is that what you guys saw?
That kid Napoleon Kaufman that Washington unleashed on Nebraska is
awesome. I haven't seen that kind of a combination of blinding speed
and moves out of the tailback spot since Joe Washington, maybe (not
counting Ismail and other part-timers...)
glenn
|
18.640 | Husker Notes Sept. 21 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:37 | 133 |
| The scoreboard read 'Nebraska 14 Washington 29', but to disappointed and angry
Nebraska fans, the final score might as well have read:
Nebraska 14
Officials 21
Washington 8
The Huskies left little doubt that they are up to the challenge of a
repeat National Championship, and since they once again won't play #1 Miami
this year to settle the question, a repeat split MNC is indeed possible.
Washington coach Don James had asked that the Huskies fans be involved, and
they were. The crowd noise was so loud that Nebraska had to call several
time outs early in both halves because they were unable to audibilize. A
Nebraska offense that relies heavily on audibles was crippled for the entire
game by Washington's raucous '12th man'.
Two noise-aided NU motion plays deep in their own territory after a punt that
should have been fielded, but wasn't, set up an end-zone sack to open the
scoring at 2-0, but Nebraska was able to hold Washington on the ensuing free
kick and start their own drive, aborted by a late and somewhat questionable
fumble call. Washington showed NU that they knew how to advance the ball.
On the one occasion when NU QB Mike Grant was able to walk up and down the line
changing the play, Nebraska scored on a 73 yard Calvin Jones run, aided
by an excellent read by Jones of the backfield blocking and good blocks by
Lance Lewis and Trumann Bell. The 9-7 deficit was as close as Nebraska
was to get for the remainder of the game, an 80 yard TD drive to open the
second half showed that Nebraska had some pride and talent left, but made
little difference in the final result.
Nebraska was outplayed in virtually every category, and their NCAA-leading
rushing game was shut down except for the one Calvin Jones TD. Washington's
kicking game kept Nebraska pinned deep most of the game, while Nebraska's
three turnovers all resulted in Washington scores.
Anticipating the strong Washington team and crowd noise, Tom Osborne loaded
up his playbook with some gimmicks, to no avail. Twice, Nebraska rolled out
the shotgun offense for the first time in modern history. A fake punt early
in the game didn't sufficiently fool the Huskies, either.
NCAA rules and Tom Osborne's temperament will preclude any official NU
reaction, but the Husker Beef Club would probably be willing to ante up for
any fines levied, because the Huskers did have some legitimate beefs with
the Pac 10 officials working the game. Aside from the fumble that wasn't,
and an end-line camera view that showed a one yard TD dive never crossed
the plane, there was the TD catch that Joe Kralik made with his knees clearly
out of the end zone. Never mind the fact that he didn't hold on to the
ball, as even ESPN was quick to show several times. The 3-11 difference
in penalties called, and the lack of interest on the part of the officials
to control the crowd noise when Nebraska had the ball also suggests that
the officials were swept up by the emotion of the largest crowd ever to
attend a non-conference game at Washington.
However, as Tom Osborne has said, to win on the road you have to make your
own breaks, and you have to be better than both the other team and the
officials. For Nebraska, it was none of the above. Tom Osborne's 0-8
record against top 10 schools in the last few years is blunted only
slightly by the fact that four of Nebraska's five losses in the past
two seasons were to eventual national champions.
A national championship season is out of the picture for Huskers fans again
this year, but a Big Eight championship could set up yet another Orange Bowl
game against Miami, where beating Nebraska has come to be a sure road to the
National Championship. For Tom Osborne, talk of retirment (voluntary or
otherwise) would surely follow a sixth stright bowl game loss in his 20th
season as head coach at Nebraska, despite his having the best winning record
of any active Division 1-A coach. Among major schools, perhaps only Notre
Dame alumni are so used to winning as a right, rather than a result.
Scoring and Stats:
Wash - Saftey, T. Jones sacked Grant in end zone
Wash - Bryant, 1 yard run (Hanson kick)
NU - C. Jones, 73 yard run (Bennett kick)
Wash - Kaufman, 1 yard run (Hanson kick)
Wash - Kralik, 29 yard pass from Hobert (Hanson kick)
NU - Grant, 1 yard run (Bennett kick)
Wash - Hanson, 42 yard field goal
Wash - Hanson, 32 yard field goal
Nebraska Washington
First downs 11 15
Rushes-yards 40-176 48-153
Passing yards 138 182
Total yards 309 335
Return yards 0 26
Passing 11-21-2 13-22-0
Punts 7-43.4 8-45.1
Fumbles-lost 3-2 1-1
Penalties-yards 11-76 3-30
Time of possession 26:03 33:57
Third-down conversions 4-12 5-16
Fourth-down conversions 0-1 0-1
Attendance, 73,333
Individual Statistics:
Rushing, NU: D. Brown 16-84, C. Jones 5-79, Lewis 7-21, Stiggee 1-(-3),
Grant 11-(-5)
Wash: Kaufman 1-57, Turner 5-55, J. Barry 7-21, Bryant 9-19,
M. Jones 4-8, Kralik 1-0, Brunell 2-(-1), Hobert 8-(-6)
Passing, NU: Grant 21-11-133-2
Wash: Hobert 19-10-155-0, Brunell 3-3-27-0
Receiving, NU: D. Brown 3-30, C. Jones 3-14, Bell, 2-23, Muhammad 1-39,
Hughes 1-20, Dixon 1-7
Wash: Bruner 4-49, Bjornson 3-72, Kralik 3-49, M. Jones 1-8,
Bryant 1-2, Kaufman 1-2
Punting, NU: Stiggee 7-304 (43.4)
Wash: Werdel 8-361 (45.1)
Punt returns, NU: Hughes 2-0
Wash: Bryant 4-26
Kickoff returns, NU: Hughes 3-61, Dixon 1-10
Wash: Bryant 1-25
Interception returns, Wash: Bailey 1-0, Pahukoa 1-0
Injury report: NU defensive tackle Jamie Liewer suffered a broken right
fibula early in the first quarter and will probably be lost for the season.
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA10055; Sun, 20 Sep 92 11:53:24 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Sun, 20 Sep 92 13:52:57 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA13160; Sun, 20 Sep 92 13:53:40 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Sep 92 13:45 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Sun, 20 Sep 92 13:45 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Washington 29, Nebraska 14
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.641 | ref alert | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:52 | 22 |
| >Nebraska 14
>Officials 21
>Washington 8
Sounds like a true Clemson fan.
>Nebraska was outplayed in virtually every category, ...
Sounds like a true football fan.
I watched it and saw Nebraska outplayed and totally unable to deal with
Napoleon Kaufman.
The crowd noise, etc. has to be dealt with and not become an excuse for
Dr Tom to gimmick his way to 0-8.
Also, IMO, it coulda been worse for the Huskers.
But hey, it wasn't a total wash for the Big 8: Iowa State beat up on
Tulane ;-).
TTom
|
18.642 | Washington-Miami is possible | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 12:04 | 15 |
| .640 is correct on some of those calls by the refs. This is from
someone who prefers Oklahoma in the Big 8.
re: Wash and Miami
There is a scenario where Miami and Washington could meet. Washington
and UCLA do not play each other this year. UCLA could win all its Pac10
games, tough but possible. Since Washington was in the Rose Bowl last
year, UCLA would go this year if they and Washington tie for the Pac10
title. Assuming Miami and Washington both go undefeated, they would
logically remain 1-2 in the polls. Based on the way the Bowl coalition
works, they would then meet in the Fiesta Bowl.
The Crazy Met
|
18.643 | My assessment... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 21 1992 12:19 | 124 |
| Washington 29 Nebraska 14
It's a different feeling than last year. Last year you could not deny that
Washington was VASTLY supperior over Nebraska. They came into Lincoln and
ran up 608 yards offense vs the Husker Blackshirts. This year NU went into
Washington and the defense played a very respectable game vs a very up UW
team and it's extremely loud fans. This year the Husker D allowed 339 yards.
A very respectable stat considering that Washington is 1. a very talented
offensive team and 2. UW had the short field all night (great field position).
Last year any sane person HAD to admit that UW was very much supperior to
Nebraska. This year you have to admit that they are probably better, but
definately not vastly supperior. This years Nebraska team could beat this
team at home!!!
The Huskers were fighting uphill all night long it seemed. Their best starting
position of the night was from the Husker 33. And we all know how Osborne clams
up and becomes very predictable with his call playing in that situation. It was
obvious to me that Coach O had very little confidence in his QB to throw the
ball downfield when they were inside the 40 yard line or so. I don't care how
big and fast your lineman are, or how good your backs are - a very good defense
can stop you if they know what you are going to do, and UW has a very good D.
Bad points for NU:
1. Grant is a very average QB in my opinion. Not the quality
you want leading your team if you are even thining about
a top-10 finish or a big bowl win. He's not that bad but
not that good either.
2. Huskers not only had to battle the number 2 team in the
nation but the Washinton fans were as loud as I have EVER
heard. NU offense had major problems with the audible and
a few procedure problems which were directly the result of
Washingtons superb fan support.
3. You will say that NU fans ALWAYS do this BUT in this case
I think we have a few legit beefs with the refs. UW got the
benefit of the doubt in all cases - I mean ALL cases from
the PAC-10 refs. The 2 worst ones were the Grant fumble which
led indirectly to the safety and NU's horrid field position
for the remainder of the half. It looked to me like his knees
were down. Then there was the TD catch to close out the half.
This play KILLED the Huskers who were hanging in there very
well despite all the adversity. I don't think he ever had
control of the ball.
4. Punt coverage. NU's punt coverage was not good. This did
contibute to, but was not the total reason for, the Huskies
excellent field postion all night.
5. Turnovers. 3 fumbles and 2 intercetions. 17 of the Huskies
points came directly after an NU turnover. This is not
acceptable. Credit UW for converting NU's mistakes to points.
6. One-Dimentional call playing. I blame coach O for this one
completely. This story is so old I could just puke.
Good points for NU:
1. The BLACKSHIRTS are back !!! The Husker Defense did an
excellent job. They were in adverse situations all night
as UW had excellent field position throught the game. NU
held the Huskies to 339 total yards as compared to 608 last
year. The NU defenders looked not only big but they also
had good speed. They looked like they were able to play
with UW very well. Last year they looked like they were
not in the same league as the Huskies. Big-8 BEWARE - the
REAL Blackshirts are BACK !!!
2. Character! The NU team did very well in a very adverse
situation. No breaks from the refs, extremely good UW fan
support, and the #2 ranked team in the nation (perhaps they
should be #1). Oh and I forgot their other uphill struggle.
I am refering to Coach Osbornes EXTREMELY conservative play
calling.
3. Tony Veland will be back at QB in mid-October. This redshirt
Freshman has a much better arm than Grant. He was ahead of
Grant in the QB race before he got a broken collar bone in
practice.
4. The other 2 "quality" Big-8 teams suck eggs right not. CU
has not looked impressive yet (sorry 400+ passing yards vs
Colorado State is not impressive) and almost lost to a vastly
inferior team Saturday. OU lost to an unranked USC. It looks
to me that CU or OU would have been whiped around much worse
than Nebraska Saturday if they had to play Washington.
5. If NU can get Veland back then I think they should fare well
in the Big-8, perhaps win it outright. OK, I used the word
PERHAPS - OK !!! I think their Defense is good enough to
get the job done.
Credit where credit is due:
1. Huskey fans. Hats off to you. As the game opened and the UW
crown sounded like a title wave, I found myself sayint that
"they can't possibly keep this up for the whole game". I was
wrong. A+ for fan support.
2. Huskey defensive game play. Everybody knows that when NU is
stacked up inside their own 35 then all you have to do is
crowd 8 guys on the line of scrimmage because Osborne will
not throw the ball. UW did a very good job in this situation.
The ESPN guys kept pointing this out all night. Now you can't
tell me that Osborne is that dumb. I think he just had no
confidence in Grant's ability to throw it downfield more than
10 yards.
3. Washington showed that they deserve their loft ranking and
possibly a higher one than they have. They played a very
flawless and nearly fundamentaly perfect game. It's a
tribute to their talent and coaching.
Believe it or not I am encouraged after this game. NU will get better and the
aversity they faced in this game from the crowd etc can only help them. The
Husker Defense is a legit top-5 defense in my opinion. If they can get Veland
back then I think the Huskers could roll in the Big-8 and would actually have
a chance in the Orange bowl. I think the Huskers showed they belong in this
game even though much of the country will only look at the 15 points spread
and not believe.
Husker Henderson
|
18.644 | schedule not working | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Sep 21 1992 12:33 | 13 |
| Washington got the breaks, the calls, the crowd, the weather, etc. but
they also outplayed the Huskers.
I think more telling than the results of this one game is Osborne's
continued inability to win the big games. In my opinion, I think this to
some extent is the result from playing his patsy schedule. Middle
Tennesse State ain't a warm up for Washington. I'm not ragging on
Nebraska's schedule per se or trying to open up the LDUC on who plays
patsies. I'm just saying it doesn't look like Nebraska's schedule is
working in terms of competing for the national championship. Not working
for Nebraska, in any case.
TTom
|
18.645 | Pac 10 refs don't like NU | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Sep 21 1992 12:56 | 22 |
| While the big 3 in the Big 8 had their problems, Kansas(3-0) continued to win
impressively. I will not be surprised if Kansas knocks off one (or more)of the
big 3 this year. I also think they will get an invitation to a bowl game.
In defense of CU, they did start their 4th string QB. Also, they had to start
3 drives at their own 1 yard line in the 1st half. It seemd like the entire
1st half was played inside the CU 20 yard line. After the game, Mac said the
CU defense was courageous. They had 3 successful goal line stands and gave up
0 points in the 1st half. In the game they had 4 ints. The 7 1st half points
scored by Minny came on a blocked punt. There was one play in this game
that has to be the guttiest play I have ever seen. Minny had 4th and 10 at
their own 5 yard line with 6 min left in the game and did a fake punt which
went for 30 yards. 160 lb Koy Detmer took off his redshirt and was impressive
in the 2nd half. We'll find out a lot more about CU's potential this weekend
when they play Iowa in Boulder. Hopefully, Kordell Stewart will be healthy.
I was surprised to see USC beat OU. OU's offense took the week off. I thought
the OU receivers dropped a lot of passes but Gundy also missed a few open
receivers. So far, I've gotten the impression that Gundy is great when the
Sooners are ahead but when they are behind or it's a close game, he struggles.
Keith
|
18.646 | go ASU! | FRETZ::HEISER | third stone from the sun | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:10 | 1 |
| Hopefully the PAC-10 refs will be at NU's next game too ;-)
|
18.647 | At least ESPN knows what's going on! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:15 | 86 |
|
> Not a good day Saturday for the Sooners and the Big 8 in general.
Definitely true, but the one small bright spot was Kansas who is ranked 24th
this week. They said on the radio this morning that it is the first time in
something like 25 years that the Jayhawks have been ranked. They get a semi-
test Thursday night against Cal on ESPN.
> Colorado won, but apparently they're continuing in last year's MO of
> pulling out games in the final moments against vastly inferior
> opponents. Still, that's better than losing, regardless of who you're
> up against.
I didn't see the game but I did listen to it.
Yes, it's better than a loss, but I was hoping that this team had gotten over
the syndrome of *barely* beating these big underdogs (Stanford, Missouri in'90
and the last 3 games of last season). Tobin was pathetic, but it sounds like
the OL is as much to blame. It seems like the first half was nothing but
"Tobin is sacked" or "Warren is caught in the backfield for a loss." The
result was only 4 yards of offense in the first half.
Detmer started the 2nd half, but Minnesota managed to get out to a 17-0 lead.
CU finally got on the board when Detmer hit Westbrook for a long TD, and then
the Buffs' intercepted Minnesota on their next series and returned it for a
TD and it was suddenly 17-14. Minnesota managed to regroup and drive for a
field goal to make it 20-14, but Detmer threw a late TD pass to put CU ahead
for good 21-20. On Minnesota's last drive they faced a 4th down at their own
5 but faked the punt and ran it out to about the 40. From there they drove
down to the CU 38 where Minnesota missed that 55-yarder and the Buffs hung on.
The biggest story of this one is Detmer. He completed 11 of 18 for 184 yards
and 2 TD's, bringing the Buffs back from a 17-0 deficit. The players said he
showed great leadership ability out there and was very self-confident - almost
cocky.
The problem areas continue to be the same for CU: lack of a running game and
a defense that certainly isn't living up to expectations. You can also add
poor pass protection to the list, at least for this past game. The Buffs
averaged less than 2 yards a carry, and the defense gave up over 400 yards of
offense. The defense again had trouble with trap plays up the middle, and
Minnesota even had success with QB sneaks (one QB sneak actually went for
something like 30 or 40 yards!). I hope this team learned from this and that
it turns out to be a 1-game aberration, because if they play like this again
against a weak opponent they might not be so lucky next time.
McCartney says there's not a QB controversy (yet) and that Stewart will start
this week if his foot is healed.
CU returns home to take on a good 1-2 Iowa team this week. The game will be
one of ABC's regional ones and starts at 1:30.
I was very disappointed in Oklahoma. Talk about a Jekyll and Hyde team. It
was hard to believe this was the same OU offense that I saw a couple weeks ago
look so good against Texas Tech. The Sooners definitely lost this game on
offense. Gundy was pressured all day and was off the mark when he did have
time. The USC defense was putting alot of guys up on the line and playing
pressure defense, but Gundy and the offense still couldn't burn 'em deep.
Their defense played decent - certainly good enough to win. OU did allow a
USC receiver to get behind them for a TD early in the 4th that got the Trojans
back into the game, but that was really the only drive the Sooners gave up.
USC scored their 2nd TD on a fumble return and on their 3rd TD they started
deep in OU territory after an interception.
I'm sure NU and their fans are upset with the officiating (UW's TD right before
the half at the back end of the endzone definitely wasn't a catch) but still,
the Huskies dominated this game IMO. Nebraska, with their powerful rushing
game, only managed on sustained drive on UW all night. UW could get away with
stacking the line of scrimmage and leaving single coverage against a team like
Nebraska, but it seems like if a good passing team good buy some time for their
QB they might be able to burn that UW defense. Of course, maybe UW would play
a good passing team differently.
It's a slap in the face of college football fans that a game like this gets
stuck this late at night on ESPN while ABC decides to carry the rating-hiking
Irish against an unranked Michigan State team that has lost to mighty Central
Michigan two years in a row. I enjoy watching ND against a highly-ranked
opponent, but not when they're heavily favored. I want to see the best game
each week, especially when it's 2 teams ranked in the top 12 and I'm sure most
"real" college football fans would agree. But I'm sure it was an easy decision
for ABC to televise ND and the Nebraska-UW. At least ESPN still respects the
real fans out there!
Joe
|
18.648 | | DECWET::CROUCH | You're1? YouDon'tLookADayOverZero | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:53 | 23 |
| I attended the UW-Nebraska game, and the missed calls were obvious,
even from the top of Husky Stadium. Even conceding that, the Huskies
impressed me with their domination of the game. As has been said,
Nebraska managed one measley drive all night.
Nebraska reminds me of the Huskies of the early '80s. They'd go
8-3 or 7-4 every year, losing to teams with superior speed. ASU would
beat 'em badly every year and I still have nightmares of watching
Cornelius Bennett single-handedly stopping the Huskies in the Holiday(?)
Bowl. But, Don James, unlike Osborne, was willing to admit that time
had passed him by, and he revamped the offense and recruited speedier
players. The result speaks for itself.
Osborne absolutely has to abandon the non-throwing quarterback offense.
One-dimensional teams have no hope of winning it all anymore.
Washington passed its toughest test of the year. I don't agree that
they are under-ranked at #2, however. They certainly aren't as good
as last year's team, especially on defense. They're off for a week,
then have USC at home.
Pete
|
18.649 | be vewy vewy careful | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:26 | 6 |
| USC will be tough, especially after their win over Oklahoma. That
win should be a great confidence booster. Still thing UW will win, but
they better not think it will be a walk in the park.
The Crazy Met
|
18.650 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Huh? | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:28 | 2 |
| The reason nebraska "Held" Washington to only 350+ yards was that
Washington never had very far to go for the score.
|
18.651 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | I need a bambulance | Mon Sep 21 1992 14:32 | 5 |
|
I've watched both USC games, and haven't really been impressed with
either. I think Washington will roll over them.
Brews
|
18.652 | The Blackshirts are BACK !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 21 1992 16:05 | 12 |
| In my opinion the reason why Osborne losses the big games can be summed up by
one phrase: ONE-DIMENTIONAL OFFENSE
Really good teams "stack it up" vs the Huskers offense and this places the NU
defense in sticky postitions all too fequently.
Just think how effective that Husker running game would be if NU had the ability
to loosen up a good defense with the passing game. Make'em play us honest and
we will kick their butts !!! But Dr. Tom seems to have some mental block or
something.
Husker Henderson
|
18.653 | Dr Tom = Dean Smith? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Sep 21 1992 16:23 | 11 |
| HH,
Regarding the ONE-DIMENTIONAL comment, to which I agree, I have a
question: Is Osborne like Dean Smith in that no matter what talent or
style the player has, he has to play it the ONE-DIMENTIONAL way or is it
that Osborne actually recruits ONE-DIMENTIONAL players?
It's hard for me to believe with the recruiting power that Nebraska has
that they can't find people to throw and catch the ball.
TTom
|
18.654 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 16:27 | 6 |
| Was Osborne already the Nebraska coach when they lost 31-30 to Miami in
the Orange Bowl c. 1983-4. That Nebraska team had scored 52 points a game
and was favored by 14 or so, if I recall correctly.
The Crazy Met
|
18.655 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 21 1992 16:34 | 4 |
| Tom Osborne became the Nebraska coach in the seventies when Bob Devaney
moved up to Athletic Director.
John
|
18.656 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 16:55 | 11 |
|
> Tom Osborne became the Nebraska coach in the seventies when Bob Devaney
> moved up to Athletic Director.
The ironic thing is that Devaney was the old-timer (and Osborne the
young turk protege) but he had no inhibitions about flinging the
football around a bit with the likes of Jerry Tagge and David Humm (?)...
glenn
|
18.657 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Tue Sep 22 1992 13:00 | 34 |
|
> 2. Character! The NU team did very well in a very adverse
> situation. No breaks from the refs, extremely good UW fan
> support, and the #2 ranked team in the nation (perhaps they
> should be #1).
I really don't see how Nebraska showed that much character. That was a nice
drive coming out of the locker room at the start of the 2nd half, but after
that NU never threatened to make it a game again. And all the bad calls came
in the first half, so that can't be used as an excuse in the 2nd half. Take
a look at FSU going into Clemson's madhouse last week and coming from behind
in the 2nd half against a good Clemson team - now that's character.
> 4. The other 2 "quality" Big-8 teams suck eggs right not. CU
> has not looked impressive yet (sorry 400+ passing yards vs
> Colorado State is not impressive) and almost lost to a vastly
> inferior team Saturday. OU lost to an unranked USC. It looks
> to me that CU or OU would have been whiped around much worse
> than Nebraska Saturday if they had to play Washington.
True, OU and CU did suck eggs last week but that was last week. That doesn't
mean they're gonna be lousy the rest of the season. Teams have been stacking
the line against CU making them prove they can pass the ball, and Stewart has
been able to get rid of the ball and make CSU and Baylor pay. Right now that
appears to be one of the big differences between CU's and OU's offense: CU has
QB's that can handle the rush while Gundy can't. Tobin, on the other hand,
wasn't able to handle the pressure and may have even seen his last action for
the season. Still, CU played poorly as a team against Minnesota and they have
alot of work to do on defense and the OL adjusting to these stacked fronts and
establishing a running game. But CU's gonna be up for the big games, just as
OU and NU probably will.
Joe
|
18.658 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Sep 23 1992 14:14 | 16 |
| >I really don't see how Nebraska showed that much character. That was a nice
>drive coming out of the locker room at the start of the 2nd half, but after
>that NU never threatened to make it a game again. And all the bad calls came
>in the first half, so that can't be used as an excuse in the 2nd half. Take
>a look at FSU going into Clemson's madhouse last week and coming from behind
>in the 2nd half against a good Clemson team - now that's character.
Joe, I KNOW Clemsen, and Clemsen is NO WASHINGTON !! ;^)
They did outscore UW 7-6 in the second half and they never quit. That despite
Osbore and his lousy stupid conservative call playing. I say NU has the talent
but not the coach.
later,
Marty
|
18.659 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Sep 23 1992 14:16 | 11 |
| >Regarding the ONE-DIMENTIONAL comment, to which I agree, I have a
>question: Is Osborne like Dean Smith in that no matter what talent or
>style the player has, he has to play it the ONE-DIMENTIONAL way or is it
>that Osborne actually recruits ONE-DIMENTIONAL players?
>It's hard for me to believe with the recruiting power that Nebraska has
>that they can't find people to throw and catch the ball.
He recruits one-dimentional players.
Marty
|
18.660 | too bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Wed Sep 23 1992 14:44 | 10 |
| Marty,
Based on your lasted couple of replies, it sounds like Osborne is the
problem and as long as he's there you'll have this type of team and play
calling.
I guess you'd better get rid of Osborne or stick to playing Middle
Tennessee State.
TTom
|
18.661 | weekend predictions | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Thu Sep 24 1992 12:10 | 29 |
| This week I'm picking on the Big 8. As you know, you win some, lose some
and sometimes you kiss your sister:
KANSAS 6 california
Kansas covers tonight, showing that they are legitimate Top 20
team. Russell White won't be enough.
COLORADO 7 iowa
Colorado gets it together at home against the overrated Hawkeyes,
winning, covering and generally adding to Iowa's problems.
NEBRASKA 17 arizona st
Nebraska beats the bejeezus out of the visitors. It doesn't
matter if they run, pass or even listen to Osborne.
INDIANA 10 missouri
Take the Tigers and the points. Indiana lost to Kentucky while
Missouri played Texas A&M tough. I like the trend.
tulsa 4� OKLAHOMA ST
The Cowboys get the nod because they're at home. They're likely
to need the points, however.
KANSAS ST 14 temple
This is the second part of the Kansas Trifecta. See above for
Kansas. Look for KC Chiefs to win big on Monday night and KSU
will drub the Owls.
TTom
|
18.662 | something to think about | FRETZ::HEISER | third stone from the sun | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:42 | 9 |
| >NEBRASKA 17 arizona st
> Nebraska beats the bejeezus out of the visitors. It doesn't
> matter if they run, pass or even listen to Osborne.
I wouldn't go this far. ASU's #1 QB has been cleared and will start.
Versus their common opponent (Huskies), ASU only scored 1 less TD than
Nebraska, and that was with their #4 QB.
Mike
|
18.663 | Ah, he made parole, eh? | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:51 | 1 |
|
|
18.664 | yeah but not much of a but | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:52 | 8 |
| Well, Mike, I know whatcher saying.
But this weekend I look for this to be one of those games where the
favored opponent thrashes the other guy.
But then again, considering the guy at the Husker Helm ...
TTom
|
18.665 | was suspended | FRETZ::HEISER | third stone from the sun | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:57 | 1 |
| He wasn't in jail so couldn't be paroled.
|
18.666 | I know, was cojone-bustin' | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Sep 24 1992 13:59 | 1 |
|
|
18.667 | UCal over Kansas... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:06 | 11 |
|
Geez, everyone knows that the ASU QB was driving and that it was his
partner riding shotgun who actually fired the shots. Give the guy a
break, willya? ;-)
Look for California to continue to demonstrate Pac-10 superiority to
conferences like the Big-8. That's a closer matchup than the spread
suggests.
glenn
|
18.668 | Kansas in the top 15 ?? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:30 | 12 |
| I'm really looking forward to watching tonight's game. In fact,
this may turn out to be one of the best games played so far this year.
I think Kansas will win in a squeeker. They have an excellent QB with
Chip Hillery and one of the best defensive tackles in the country with
Dana Stublefield. Kansas has excellent Cinderella potential and I think
they'll open a few eyes tonight. They're playin at home so the crowd
should be totally wild knowing they're on national TV for the first time
in who knows how many decades.
Go Jayhawks,
Keith
|
18.669 | No 15? Better win big! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Thu Sep 24 1992 14:34 | 6 |
| In the FWIW dept, Sagarin has Kansas as the nuber 3 power rating, in
between Miami and Florida St (Washington is 1). While that's a bit much,
they shouldn't have any problem with California if'n the team that went
to West Lafayette a couple of weeks ago shows up.
TTom
|
18.670 | A national telecast from KU not on the hardwood? | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:16 | 23 |
| > In the FWIW dept, Sagarin has Kansas as the nuber 3 power rating, in
> between Miami and Florida St (Washington is 1).
You think that's bad, Scripps-Howard has them ranked 2nd, which I think is
based mostly on the fact that KU is ranked first in the country in scoring,
second in pass defense and total defense, and fourth in total offense. But
that's gonna happen when you've played Oregon State, Ball State, and Tulsa in
your first 3 games. KU probably does have a pretty decent team, but I don't
think they're a serious threat to win the Big 8 or anything like that. A win
tonight and the very worse they should go is 8-3, which will put them in a
minor bowl. I'll pick the Jayhawks to win by at least 2 TD's tonight.
It'll be strange to see a game on ESPN from a place like KU, but it's exactly
the kind of exposure a program like KU needs. I hope the announcers remember
to show up at Memorial Stadium and not Allen Field House. Another strange
thing is that the game is not sold out.
Stewart will be ready to start for CU against Iowa Saturday.
Joe
|
18.671 | Jayhawk fan, at least tonight | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:43 | 9 |
| Yeah, rankings at this time of year don't count for much and mostly the
power ratings don't have much relevance at any time. According to
Sagarin, you can take the ratings, add 3 points for the home team and
"predict" the outcome. No Way!
I don't like the sounds of this not being sold out. Hopefully, the
faithful will be loud, in any case.
TTom
|
18.672 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:47 | 10 |
| The papers have KU favored by 7, Joe thinks they'll win by at least
2 TD's and somebody else said it will be a blowout in favor of the
Jayhawks. I'm the only one picking a close game. Has something bad
happened to Cal this year ? Last year they were in the top 10 for a while
and had an exciting running back. It seemed to me that they were a developing
west coast power. What's the story with Cal. ?
It's a shame the game is not sold out.
Keith
|
18.673 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 24 1992 17:50 | 13 |
|
> I'm the only one picking a close game.
I'm picking Cal to win...
> Has something bad happened to Cal this year ?
Yeah, as mentioned they got blown out by Purdue. That's about as bad
as it gets. But I don't think they're that bad...
glenn
|
18.674 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 24 1992 18:00 | 19 |
|
> Yeah, rankings at this time of year don't count for much and mostly the
> power ratings don't have much relevance at any time. According to
> Sagarin, you can take the ratings, add 3 points for the home team and
> "predict" the outcome. No Way!
Three points is the demonstrated home-field advantage in football.
Sagarin's ratings range from somewhere around 50 points for the worst
1-A teams to 90+ points for the best, or about a 40+ point margin
between the best and worst teams. That's a decent approximation of
the point spread between such teams (the claim is that this method
will "predict" the *margin* of victory and not the actual final
score, which obviously depends on whether the teams are offense- or
defense-minded and not on their raw ratings).
The ratings have to be taken with a grain of salt, especially early in
the season. There's precious little data to work with...
glenn
|
18.675 | the ratings prediction | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Thu Sep 24 1992 18:08 | 21 |
| Right, Glenn.
The ratings supposedly predict the difference not the actual. In this
regard, they are basically about as useful as flipping a coin. I don't
follow the other ratings but I have spent a fair amount of time
considering Sagarin's ratings and that's the ratings that seem mostly
useless with that regard.
Just for the record:
Kansas 92.76 (#3)
California 76.89 (#36)
add the 3 and the predicted difference is 18.87
The line is in the 6 to 7 range so this is predicted - by Sagarin - to be
an easy cover.
We shall see.
TTom
|
18.676 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Thu Sep 24 1992 19:00 | 5 |
| RE: What happened to Cal
I felt they were extremely overrated last year, and last year's success
projected into fairly high expectations for this year.
Joe
|
18.677 | NU has the talent... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Sep 24 1992 19:31 | 20 |
| HI Tom.
>Marty,
>Based on your lasted couple of replies, it sounds like Osborne is the
>problem and as long as he's there you'll have this type of team and play
>calling.
>I guess you'd better get rid of Osborne or stick to playing Middle
>Tennessee State.
>TTom
You summed it up pretty well. I would choose for the first option though.
Husker fans love and respect TO for his character and running a clean program.
But if we had a balanced attack - Nebraska would be AWESOME !!!
That is a big IF!
Husker Henderson
|
18.678 | | FDCV07::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Fri Sep 25 1992 09:05 | 5 |
| Cal Beats Kansas.. 27-23? Dunno the score but CAL won..
So much for rankings...
REK
|
18.679 | comments and ratings | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:18 | 25 |
| Yup, 27-23.
The Refs are responsible. They shoulda thrown the guy who was calling the
plays for Kansas outta the stadium. But seriously folks, the difference
in this game looked like Russell White and both Cal lines. On O they
consistently moved the Jayhawks back and opened holes. On D, they
absolutely stopped the basic ground game of Kansas, who insisted on
repeatedly trying to make something happen in the middle.
Typical play: late in the first half, Kansas punts, Cal fumbles, Kansas
recovers on about the Cal 20. First play, you got it, up the middle for
nothing.
FWIW, here's the ratings and "predictions" from Sagarin on the rest of
the Big 8 games.
rating favorite predicted acutal underdog rating
92.76 KANSAS 18.87 6 california 76.89
83.12 COLORADO 9.27 7 iowa 76.85
89.47 NEBRASKA 15.06 17 arizona st 77.41
72.89 INDIANA 5.63 10 missouri 70.26
72.05 tulsa 4.58 4.5 OKLAHOMA ST 70.47
72.16 KANSAS ST 11.70 14 temple 63.46
TTom
|
18.680 | Cal 27, KU 23 | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:28 | 11 |
| You can probably hear the bounce of the basketball already at Lawrence. KU
probably has a much better team than they showed last night, but they didn't
play well and ran into a better opponent than they have the previous 3 weeks.
I don't think Hilleary is all that great - I agree with Gottfried, that the
option offense would be best suited for him. About all the offense KU could
muster was on Hilleary's QB draws. Even if KU had pulled that one out last
night (and they certainly had their chances in the 2nd half) it wouldn't have
been all that impressive of a victory.
Joe
|
18.681 | Hilleary's rushing was Kansas' entire offense... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:31 | 19 |
|
Cal dominated... if it weren't for a bunch of what were basically dumb
unforced turnovers by Cal it wouldn't have even been a game.
Teams have got to start realizing that these middling Pac-10 teams are
not to be taken lightly! California, Stanford, USC, UCLA, Arizona St.
etc. are not generally overrated. The reputation of the conference as
a whole has taken a beating in the 80s and 90s because the teams beat
up on each other (and because they generally play tough non-conference
schedules) and because the top Pac-10 teams haven't been great
(Washington 1984 and 1991 were the only championship contenders of the
last 12 years). The quality of the teams shows in the all-around
balanced game they play, though.
I'm a Big-8 fan but I've seen this "not just the Big 2 or 3 anymore"
stuff before. I think the conference is fortunate if it's even holding
on to that reputation...
glenn
|
18.682 | Cal looked good | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Fri Sep 25 1992 10:43 | 3 |
| BTW, Good call on the game, Glenn.
TTom
|
18.683 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Fri Sep 25 1992 11:52 | 11 |
| You nailed it TTom, KU was pretty much bullied around on both sides of
the ball. Outside of Hilleary and that long TD run by one of the
running backs, KU probably only averaged a yard or two per carry. And
on Cal's last drive they ran right at the Jayhawks in what ended up
being the game-clinching drive.
Going back to last Saturday, that makes 4 straight national or regional
telecasts involving a Big 8 team that lost.
Joe
|
18.684 | putting it on the line | FRETZ::HEISER | tragically cool | Fri Sep 25 1992 13:50 | 12 |
| ASU will beat Nebraska too. Snyder has brought a whole new look and
atmosphere to this school. The offensive and defensive play calling have
been as unpredictable as Nebraska is predictable. Larry Marmie thought
it was a big deal to send 4 people at the QB, Snyder doesn't hesitate
to send 8 and does it often.
The only thing that could hurt ASU is that All-American Eric Guiliford
won't be there (injury). He's key in the passing game. He also ranks
3rd (yardage & receptions) in ASU history behind the other receiving
greats: John Jefferson and Ron Brown.
Mike
|
18.685 | Nebraska might suffer a letdown, but they're usually consistent | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 25 1992 14:00 | 11 |
|
> ASU will beat Nebraska too.
I don't think I'd go that far. I thought ASU had a shot to beat
Nebraska last year and they did give them a real battle, but with the
game in Lincoln this year that might be a bit much to ask. ASU won't
need too much unpredictability on defense; they'll need to try to
cancel the Brown vs. Jones track meet...
glenn
|
18.686 | glad Marmie is gone | FRETZ::HEISER | tragically cool | Fri Sep 25 1992 14:05 | 5 |
| Yeah ASU did blow it last year. Seven turnovers and a Tom
Osborne-clone for an offensive coordinator and still only lost by 5
points.
Mike
|
18.687 | BEARS | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Sep 25 1992 14:43 | 4 |
| Joe, how about them Bears ??
Drewski
|
18.688 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Fri Sep 25 1992 16:57 | 3 |
| They got whipped by the Boilerfakers a couple weeks ago...
Joe
|
18.689 | coulda been worse | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:53 | 23 |
| Not too shabby, especially considering the poor start:
>KANSAS 6 california
Not too good. Kansas loses 23-27.
>COLORADO 7 iowa
Saved by Detmer. Colorado wins 28-12.
>NEBRASKA 17 arizona st
Not exactly bejeezus but the Huskers cover, 45-24.
>INDIANA 10 missouri
Kiss your sister. Missouri loses and pushes, 20-10.
>tulsa 4� OKLAHOMA ST
Semi-upset, the Cowboys win 24-19.
>KANSAS ST 14 temple
Kansas part II holds me up, winning 36-14.
4-1-1.
TTom
|
18.690 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 28 1992 11:05 | 32 |
| After a poor offensive first half the Buffs got things going and beat the Iowa
Hawkeyes 28-12. The defense appears to be coming around. After a good showing
last week against Minnesota, the defense really came to life against Iowa,
recording 10 sacks and limiting the Hawks to 229 yards of total offense. Ron
Woolfork had 5 of those sacks and Chad Brown had 3. The one lone spot the
defense didn't do very well in is rushing defense (again) - the stats say Iowa
only averaged 2 yards per carry, but if you take away the sacks their running
backs averaged about 5 yards per carry and were constantly finding holes in
the middle of the CU defense.
CU led 7-6 at the half and Detmer replaced Stewart at the start of the 3rd
quarter and proceeded to complete 7 out of 11 for 155 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Stewart just wasn't himself the first half, possibly due to his foot still
bothering him, but he just looked plain rusty to me. He missed alot of
practice time this past week. McCartney insists there's no QB controversy and
that Stewart is still the starter, but it's quite apparent that he won't
hesitate to put in Detmer if things aren't going that well. The running game
finally had a productive day as the Buffs rushed for over 200 yards, 114 by
Lamont Warren.
This was a fairly impressive victory over a good but certainly not great Iowa
team. However, CU still is having some problems, the most evident of which is
the turnovers and penalties. CU turned the ball over 5 times and had 9
penalties, and at least a couple I can think of that kept crucial drives alive
for the Hawkeyes. And as I mentioned earlier, the run defense, particularly
up the middle, continues to have their problems. (Which doesn't bode well for
the Nebraska game, but we'll be talking more about that in about a month :^)).
CU is off next weekend and then plays at Missouri on ESPN's Thursday night game.
Joe
|
18.691 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 28 1992 11:18 | 14 |
|
> The one lone spot the
> defense didn't do very well in is rushing defense (again) - the stats say Iowa
> only averaged 2 yards per carry, but if you take away the sacks their running
> backs averaged about 5 yards per carry and were constantly finding holes in
> the middle of the CU defense.
Gotcha. Hayden Fry gets a reprieve from a violation of his
constitutional rights. They really should separate the sack yardage or
include it in the team passing yardage like the NFL does...
glenn
|
18.692 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 28 1992 11:26 | 27 |
| The most difficult play I have to deal with is when there's a running
QB. If a good runner goes back to pass and runs you never really know
if it's a planned run or a scramble. One of the most difficult games I
ever had was the 1988 Seattle at New England game where the QBs were
Doug Flutie and Dave Krieg.
College offenses as an overall rule don't use a lot of dropback
passing. They use a lot of throwing on the run and the plays are
designed to turn into running plays pretty quickly if there's nothing
open on the pass. Very often, they're designed as pass or run at the
quarterback's option.
In order to give some consistency to the stats, the NCAA just calls all
plays where the QB is dumped behind the line as running plays. It
hurts the running game as a whole, especially for the QB, but it gives
some consistency to the stats and gives the head statisticians fewer
gray hairs. The NCAA does have a sack category but the yardage doesn't
come off passing offense, like it does in the NFL.
I agree with the way the NCAA does this.
John
PS - what should be changed are the plays where the QB takes the snap,
late in the first half or at the end of the game, and kneels to kill
the clock. The USFL called these "clock consuming plays" and the
yardage didn't count against team rushing.
|
18.693 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 28 1992 11:32 | 9 |
|
You make a lot of sense, John, but at least give us the number of sacks
(and corresponding yardage) in the box score! I don't mean the
statisticians, but rather the sports editors... in a case like the
Colorado game where there was an unusually high number of sacks, that
simple fact turned the interpretation of the game completely upside-down.
glenn
|
18.694 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 28 1992 11:54 | 4 |
| The statistic is kept but it's sort of unofficial. I don't know why
it's not published.
John
|
18.695 | Nebraska 45 ASU 24 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 28 1992 12:56 | 24 |
| I saw this game on Prime Sports Network.
Very wierd game. It was closer than the score. ASU got 500 yards vs NU. NOONE
SHOULD * EVER * GET 500 YARDS VS YOU. I don't know where the NU defense was.
Osborne said after the game that the Huskers were suffering a letdown. That
may have contributed some but not for it all. ASU was playing catchup for
the entire 2nd half so they opened up. Boy they ran the ball well too.
ASU was upset about the officating and I think they have a legit beef. The Prime
sideline guy said that some of the ASU players were saying "they are giving it
back to them" when they would come to the sidelines. This in reference to the
treatment NU got from the ref's at Washington.
If ASU could have controlled their turnovers and had less penalties then this
would have been a down to the wire game. As it turned out this game was filled
with big plays on Nebraska's part. Both defensively and offensively. The NU
crowd was also very good.
You would have to see the game to know what I am talking about. Very strange
game.
Did you see it Mike? I'm sure you are pretty upset about it.
Husker Henderson
|
18.696 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:00 | 28 |
| It's true that the Buffs have given up some yardage up the middle. But still
the Buffs held the Hawkeyes to only one TD and 2 field goals. That's pretty
good when you consider:
1. The Hawkeyes had the ball for 38 minutes compared to the Buffs
22 minutes.
2. The CU offense turned over the ball 6 times.
3. The Hawkeyes had a veteran offensive line consistiong mostly of
5th year seniors. (this same offensive line gave up a total of
11 sacks all of last year, the Buffs got 10 sacks on Sat).
All in all, I think the Buffs defense was outstanding. Some reasons why the
up the middle runs were successful may be because CU is playing a true
freshman, Shannon Clavelle and a redshirt freshman, Darius Holland at nose
Tackle which is a new position for both of them. They have to play these
guys because of a season ending injury to Jeff Bruner. Also, the frequent
blitzing and shifting line backers, often leaves little protection once
the ball carrier penetrates the defensive line. I think the CU defense will
work great as long as the opposing QB is immobile like Hartlieb of Iowa
but will have problems if the QB is mobile and good at evading pass rushers
like the Minnesota QB was. (this means I'll have more confidence if NU plays
Grant at QB and not Frazier when they meet the Buffs on Halloween).
The press keeps on trying to make a QB controversy for CU. However, there
was an article in the Rocky Mtn News yesterday where a writer called it
a QB situation and made a comparison. Would you rather listen to Mozart
or Beethoven ? I agree.
Keith
|
18.697 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:01 | 7 |
| Not seeing the game live, I was quite pleased with the CU defense when I
first looked at the Iowa rushing stats. But after watching the tape of the
game, I was noticing how well Iowa was running the ball. Then I looked at
the box score again and discounting the QB's "rushing" stats, I noticed
Iowa averaged about 5 yards a pop on pure running plays.
Joe
|
18.698 | Veland is suppost to be able to play mid to late October... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:03 | 24 |
| After watching 3 of NU's 1st 4 games on TV I will make a prediction now:
IF Mike Grant is the NU QB on Halloween day vs Colorado - CU will win.
Grant seems like a heck of a nice guy but the kid can't throw it accurately
over 10 yards. When Osborne had Gdowski and McCant at QB he at least would go
20 yards or more down the middle at times. Now with Grant he almost never does
this. Vs Washington Grant had an open reciever behind the UW secondary and
he missed him with no sack pressure. I've notices that Osborne will only throw
5 - 10 yard sideline patterns with Grant. He almost never goes downfield. I
think this is because Osborne has no confidence in Grant to throw up the middle
and I don't blame him.
With Grant at QB the Huskers are even more predictable than before. CU will win
if Grant plays the whole game.
NU's only hope lies in Tony Veland. This is the kid who got a broken collar
bone pre-season. He was the #1 QB at the time. He supposedly has a much better
arm as a redshirt Frosh.
Osborne also has the kid from Florida Frazier on the bench. It's obvious to me
that Dr. Tom wants to redshirt this kid. Too bad.
Husker Henderson
|
18.699 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:44 | 8 |
|
> Osborne also has the kid from Florida Frazier on the bench. It's obvious to me
> that Dr. Tom wants to redshirt this kid. Too bad.
Frazier has already played this year so he won't be redshirted, at
least not this season.
Joe
|
18.700 | | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Sep 28 1992 14:54 | 3 |
| You are right Joe. I forgot about that. Frazier did take some mop-up snaps
in a game. Geesh that makes me even more upset. Why not just play the kid
now. He CAN'T be worse than Grant.
|
18.701 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Lose, Baby | Thu Oct 01 1992 16:36 | 14 |
| We got our tickets to the CU/OU game today and we'll be smack dab in
the middle of the OU section! That'll definitely make things interesting.
I caught some of Osborne's TV show last night and I didn't hear him
mention anything about changing starting QB's, but I was reading today
where Veland might be the starter for the next game against OSU.
Does anyone know if Nebraska has permanently change to white pants on
the road or was that just for the UW game? The only time I can recall
them wearing white pants with white jerseys was in the Citrus Bowl
against Georgia Tech a couple years ago.
Joe
|
18.702 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:23 | 4 |
| I just heard on the radio that the CU/OU game on Oct 17 will be televised
by ESPN and the start time is 5:30.
Keith
|
18.703 | CU 6, Missouri 0 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 09 1992 11:12 | 51 |
| (I don't have the stats in front of me so I'm recalling many of these numbers
from memory).
It certainly wasn't pretty - in fact it was downright ugly, but a win
nevertheless. The Buffs are developing a disturbing trend of struggling
against heavy underdogs, which started 2 years ago with extremely narrow
wins over Stanford and Missouri.
With apologies to Missouri, if CU would've lost that game last night they
only would've beaten themselves. CU got into position at least 7 times I
can remember but only ended up with 2 field goals (4 FG attempts, a pick
in the end zone, and 2 failed 4th-down attempts). And this is not a very
good Missouri defense. As it turned out, CU severely outgained the Tigers
something like 450 to 180.
I'm probably beginning to sound like a broken record after every CU game, but
they continue to hurt themselves with mistakes - turnovers and penalties in
particular. CU ended up with 8 or 9 penalties and 4 turnovers. In addition
to 2 interceptions, Stewart also missed some wide open receivers. Once
again, CU faced a defense that was stacked up front almost daring them to
pass, but the Buffs never could unleash the big play. The running game was
okay, but when they needed to run out the clock at the end they put together a
nice drive totally on the ground. Numerous times CU back were dropped for
losses, but they also broke away for 8 or 10 yards at times - that's gonna
happen with this offense. Hill came in for the 2nd half after Lamont
Warren got hurt, and I thought Hill actually looked a little better. For
whatever reason, the Buffs never really opened up the offense - maybe because
of the bad weather - but instead went mostly with short passes. And Stewart
was not particularly sharp last night.
I think if CU is struggling at halftime of the OU game McCArtney will put in
Detmer. The only time the offense really clicked the past 3 games is when
Detmer has been in there. You can say Stewart was bothered by the injury
against Iowa and give him the benefit of the doubt last night - the weather,
plus everyone's gonna come up with a poor performance now and then.
You can't complain a whole lot about the defense last night. The Tigers only
got into scoring position 3 times last night but 2 of those were set up by
turnovers. The first time was when Warren fumbled on CU's 2nd possession of
the game and the other was when Mizzou returned an interception to the CU 35
yard line late in the game. CU's defense also seemed to get stronger as the
game went on.
Overall, quite a pitiful performance. When you consider how CU moved the ball,
they could've scored 5 or 6 TD's, but they just didn't convert when they needed
to. Penalties, missed scoring opportunities, missed 3rd down attempts, missed
open receivers, turnovers, etc. If the Buffs can't score when they're in
position against OU or NU they've lose by 3 or 4 TD's.
Joe
|
18.704 | 5 down, 6 to go | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Oct 09 1992 14:00 | 41 |
| I don't think the game was quite as bad as Joe described in the previous
note. The defense had problems early in the year, but last night they were
outstanding and it's good to see them come together and live up to their
pre-season publicity. I think the defense will continue to be tough the
rest of the year. Outstanding defense wins championships and it's looks
like CU's has finally come together.
The weather was horrible which I'm sure affected both teams. But Stewart
still appeared to be hampered by his injured foot. One of Stewart's best
talents is running the ball out of the pocket. But, he only ran one or
2 times and appeared slow and seemed to favor one foot.
On the other hand, CU had almost 2 weeks to prepare for MU while MU had
only 4 days.
The Buffs were penalized something like 80 yards(many came at critical times)
while the Tigers were penalized only 5 yards. In the post game interview,
Mac didn't come right out and say it, but I got the impression he thought
the refs were trying to pay back the Tigers because of their 5th down
mistake a couple of years ago.
James Hill looked good last night with his tough inside running. I think
he'll become the primary back late in the game when the Buffs are trying
to run out the clock. But Lamont Warren will still play most of the game.
I was somewhat surprised that the Buffs didn't play Rashaan Salaam last
night. I gues they still want to break him in when they have a more
comfortable lead.
One player who continues to pleasantly surprise me this year is Charles
Johnson. Last year, he had a habit of dropping passes at critical times.
This year he's catching almost everything thrown to him including some that
he shouldn't catch. Last night. he tied Westbrook's school record of 11
catches in a game and he had a total of something like 160 yards. I was
surprised ESPN didn't make him CU's MVP. Westbrook was good last night, but
Johson was better and Westbrook had a fumble.
Now I can't wait for next Saturday. It should be a great game against
the Sooners. Joe and I will be in the stadium waving to everybody
watching ESPN.
Keith
|
18.705 | Warm it up Detmer! | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Oct 12 1992 10:41 | 5 |
|
The QB controversy at CU is over for a while. Stewart has a
broken wrist.......... :^(
Claybone
|
18.706 | CU might look good | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Oct 12 1992 10:49 | 7 |
| This has to viewed as a plus for Colorado. Stewart hasn't been getting it
done all season. Sure CU is winning but barely. The best they've looked
all year was the second half of the Iowa game when Detmer dominated.
With Detmer, ya gotta like CU's chances.
TTom
|
18.707 | I'd play Stewart if he was healthy | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 12 1992 13:39 | 27 |
| >This has to viewed as a plus for Colorado. Stewart hasn't been getting it
>done all season. Sure CU is winning but barely. The best they've looked
>all year was the second half of the Iowa game when Detmer dominated.
You gotta be kiddin. All Stewart does is throw for a school record 400+
yards in his first start. In his 2nd game, he goes 16 for 17 and then gets
injured. He doesn't play the 3rd game. In the 4th game he's noticably
rusty and limping but still leads the team to a half time lead before
taken out the 2nd half. In the MU game, he didn't play all that bad
considering the wind and rain, but penalties and turnovers kept the team
out of the endzone. Stewart has 2 talents that Detmer may never have.
First, he can run with the ball almost as good as the running backs.
Second, he can throw harder and longer than Detmer. He doesn't have the
experience with this type of offense that Detmer has and he doesn't throw
to the secondary receivers as well as Detmer but with his talents, Mac
has to give him as much game experience as possible. I was going to say that
Stewart, who is 6-2, 210 lbs is more durable than Detmer who is 160 lbs
but with his last 2 injuries, I'm not sure. But, Detmer hasn't received
an all out hit from a 240 lb linebacker or a 300 lb lineman. Who knows
how well he'll be able to take a hit how he'll react after this happens.
This has to be in Mac's mind when he makes a decsion on who to play.
I think Detmer and Stewart are both excellent QB's and I'm really looking
forward to watching both of them play the next few years. But I have to agree
with the way Mac has handled the situation so far.
Keith
|
18.708 | syrian | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Oct 12 1992 14:15 | 15 |
| All I'm basing it on is the lasted couple of outings.
I'm not sure about the Baylor game but didn't Steward get some help there
from a 3rd QB?
In any case, if'n you look at the rest of the season it's been win but,
in the betting parlance, a bunch of big "did not covers", with the
notable exception of Iowa which was definitely Detmer's game.
As to the performance against Missouri, rain notwithstanding, I was very
unimpressed with Stewart.
So, no, I wasn't kidding.
TTom
|
18.709 | He still passed for 330+ yards against MU | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 12 1992 16:18 | 19 |
| >I'm not sure about the Baylor game but didn't Steward get some help there
>from a 3rd QB?
After Stewart got injured, they played 4th string QB, Duke Tobin.
I believe he played all of the 2nd half. Tobin played fairly well but
his stats weren't included in Stewart's stats.
>in the betting parlance, a bunch of big "did not covers"
I don't think the CU coaches or the players are thinking about beating the
spread. The way I look at it, unless you're betting on the game, who cares.
>with the notable exception of Iowa which was definitely Detmer's game.
I agree, Detmer looked great. I hope he plays that well against OU this
weekend. But don't forget, Stewart was injured and only practiced with
the team 1 or 2 times in the 2 weeks leading up to the Iowa game.
Keith
|
18.710 | no but yes | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sir Turtle | Mon Oct 12 1992 16:26 | 10 |
| Not trying to imply or otherwise suggest that the coaches, players or
anyone else is betting on these games. However, not covering spreads is
one measurement of non-performance, that is, CU did not do as well as
predicted. That's all I meant by the "did not cover".
And I'll stick by my opinion that it's not all that bad that Stewart is
out and Detmer is in. The danger, of course, with that opinion is that it
may be shared by Iowa coach Hayden Frye ;-).
TTom
|
18.711 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 12 1992 18:44 | 10 |
| The Sooners had a tough time with the Longhorns this past weekend.
One of their best linebackers went out early with an injury. I can't remember
his name. But does anyone know if his injury was serious or if he'll
be ready to play against the Buffs on Saturday ?
Wide receiver, Corey Warren, looked real good for the Sooners last weekend.
He should be a real test for Deon Figures and company.
Keith
|
18.712 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 13 1992 12:48 | 29 |
| The OU linebacker that got hurt was either Barnes or Beavers, one of
their stars, and he won't be playing against CU this weekend.
Unless OU suddenly snaps out of it and wins the Big 8 title, I think
Gibbs *has* to be gone after this season. I just can't see the OU
faithful letting this go on.
RE: CU not covering
Sure they've struggled against a couple of weak teams, but I don't feel
so bad after seeing what's been happening around the country:
Ohio State loses at Wisonsin
Cal gets killed by Purdue
Miami squeaks by Arizona
Texas A&M has struggled in every game this season
Tennessee loses at home to an Arkansas team that lost to the Citadel
Penn State struggled against Cincinnati
ND lost at home to Stanford (albeit a good team), but the Irish were
favored by something like 12 in that game.
So what I'm trying to say is that there are plenty of upsets and
near-upsets taking place around the country but CU is still undefeated.
The Buffs are the lowest ranked undefeated-untied team that is a
serious contender for the national title, but much of that is due to
the fact that they started out the season ranked pretty low relative to
the teams currently ranked ahead of them.
Joe
|
18.713 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Oct 13 1992 12:51 | 15 |
| Some Big 8 news from today's RMN:
A number of OU fans threw beer on Gary Gibbs as he was leaving the
stadium after the Texas game. A popular T-shirt in Oklahoma reads
"Bring Barry Back" on the front and the back says "Good-bye Gary".
Greg Biekert was named the Big 8 defensive player of the week.
Kordell Stewart has already gotten a 2nd lighter weight cast put on
his left forearm and wrist. He claims he can play on Sat. I doubt
that he'll see any action on Sat and probably not for at least 2
weeks and then only if Detmer goes down. He's also still having
problems with his sprained foot.
Keith
|
18.714 | Bring back Barry? Will they ever learn? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 13 1992 16:56 | 17 |
|
Oklahoma sips. Unlike the last three games with Texas, where Oklahoma
outplayed the Longhorns only to get beat by Gibbs' conservatism, it
appears that OU was thoroughly outplayed in this one. Maybe
expectations coming into this season were too high (and I'm amongst the
guilty). Maybe the post-probation talent deficiency really has caught
up to OU, regardless of anything Gibbs has or hasn't done (and he has
opened up the offense this year, and it hasn't worked). Were there
specific coaching mistakes in this game or the USC game that support
the opinion that Gibbs should be canned. Not that I expect such logic
to be present with spoiled OU fans, but I'm inclined to back Gibbs for
the next few years and through his own recruiting classes for the
simple reason that he appears to be running a clean program. That
should be the starting point, first and foremost.
glenn
|
18.715 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 13 1992 17:09 | 6 |
| Rat on Glenn,
Lasted time Oklyhoma was clean was during the Dust Bowl storms.
8^)
MikeL
|
18.716 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 13 1992 18:59 | 13 |
| I was in and out during the OU-Texas game, but from what I've seen of OU this
year, poor coaching by Gibbs hasn't stood out in my mind. It's true that the
number of scholarship players at OU is down because of the probation. And
while I would probably agree that Gibbs should be given a chance to recruit his
own full class, I just can't see the OU fans being patient. Sure, OU is still
gonna win 7 or 8 games in the meantime, they just aren't going to compete for
national championships. But that doesn't cut it in a place like Oklahoma. One
thing about Gibbs' teams though, they don't seem to have that confident, fiery,
we're-gonna-kick-your-ass-attitude that the Sooners of the mid-80's had and I
think that translates into less success on the field.
Joe
|
18.717 | More on Gibbs... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:14 | 15 |
| The OU linebacker that is out for the CU game is Reggie Barnes. He'll
not only miss the CU game but the next 3 or 4 games.
OU regent Melvin Hall has said the regents are 100% behind Gibbs. The
Lettermans Association, made up of former Sooners players, held a press
conference Tuesday to support Gibbs. And Switzer has been openly
criticizing the OU fans for getting Gibbs' case.
As for the scholarship situation, OU currently has 72 scholarship
players, but the NCAA allows 92.
Gibbs' players haven't accrued a single felony.
Joe
|
18.718 | Felonies=standard?? | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 15 1992 12:24 | 9 |
| -1,
Now I ain't pointing fingers at OU or any other school, but
are you imlying that accruing of felonies is the judgmental
standard?? That's a long stretch, Joe. I think it goes deeper than
that. And I know you ain't an apologist for Miami with dat
statement.
MikeL
|
18.719 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:17 | 7 |
| You kind of lost me on your last note there Mike. I wasn't trying to
imply anything, just reporting some facts about Gibbs and the OU
program. One of the main things they wanted to change at OU was clean
up the program and keep the players out of the off-the-field headline,
and that's something Gibbs has done.
Joe
|
18.720 | Husker Notes 14-Oct.92 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:25 | 125 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 14-OCT-1992 00:56:25.79
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Nebraska 55, Oklahoma State 0
Administrative note: An unusually busy week kept me from posting the
statistics from the Arizona State game before the Sunday paper was tossed
out. I'll try to be more prompt in the remaining games this season.
Nebraska 55, Oklahoma State 0
In the aftermath of a 55-0 drubbing of Oklahoma State, one would think
all was peaceful, happy, and calm in Huskerland. Ah, but that doesn't
sell newspapers. So, on Monday the Omaha World-Herald was trying to
make something out of Tommie Frazier's appearance in the second quarter
with the score 'only' 13-0. Starting QB Mike Grant made a successful
re-appearance later in the game, it should be noted.
And, just to make life interesting, Nebraska's dynamic duo backfield
suggested to Assistant Head Coach Frank Solich Monday that maybe the current
rotation system (alternating quarters for Jones and Brown, or is that Brown
and Jones?) should be replaced by a system wherein the 'starter' plays until
tired, then the 'second string back' goes in.
[Baseball fans with a sense of history may recall the ill-fated 'rotating
coach' experiment that the Chicago Cubs tried in the mid 1960's. Who,
*me*, have an opinion on this question??]
Calvin Jones garnered 176 yards in just 7 (!!) carries, a 25+ yard average.
Of course, this was helped by touchdown romps of 90 and 48 yards. Gee, if
only Jones (or Brown) got 25-30 carries per game like a certain highly-touted
running back from San Diego State, Nebraska might have a Heisman candidate too!
Nebraska extended its streak against Oklahoma State to 30 games without
a loss. (There was a tie.) The margin of victory is the most lopsided
in the series, which dates back to 1960.
As impressive as the offense was, especially the running game, the defense
racked up its first goose-egg in a L O N G time, and only allowed the
Cowboys across the 50 yard line twice. (For the historically minded, the
last shutout was a 56-0 game against Minnesota.) The defense also only
allowed 155 yards, all rushing. (OSU was 0-3 in passing, maybe they
are using an old copy of the Nebraska playbook?)
Not to be outdone, NU punter Mike Stigge set a school record with an 87
yard punt. (Yes, you read that right, the ball rolled dead on the 5 yard
line. Punt records have only been kept since 1966, though.)
A turnover-free and low penalty game also pleased Tom Osborne.
Scoring and Statistics:
Oklahoma State 0 0 0 0 - 0
Nebraska 13 21 14 7 - 55
NU - Washington, 5 yard pass from Grant (Bennett kick)
NU - C. Jones, 90 yard run (kick failed)
NU - Dixon, 42 yard pass from Frazier (Bennett kick)
NU - Grant, 15 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Bell, 14 yard pass from Grant (Bennett kick)
NU - C. Jones, 48 yard run (Bennett kick)
NU - Armstrong, 8 yard pass from Frazier (Sieler kick)
NU - McMillen, 11 yard run (Sieler kick)
OSU NU
First Downs 7 21
Rushes-yards 56-155 51-366
Passing yards 0 140
Total yards 155 506
Return yards 0 45
Passing 0-3-0 12-22-0
Fumbles-lost 2-2 1-0
Penalties-yards 3-20 3-15
Time of possession 31:12 28:48
Third-down conversions 3-16 7-15
Fourth-down conversions 1-1 2-4
Attendance: 76,116 (186th consecutive sellout)
Rushing-NU C. Jones 7-176, D. Brown 18-72, Frazier 6-38, McDuffy 2-17,
Mackovicka 3-14, McMillen 1-11, Dixon 1-8, Grant 6-7,
Schlesinger 3-6, Da. Schmadeke 1-6, Lewis 1-4,
Stanley 1-4, Norris 1-3
Rushing-OSU J. White 11-65, M. Williams 25-59, Franks 10-40,
Spatz 3-13, Marrow 1-3, Loveland 6-(-25)
Passing-NU Grant 13-8-0-74, Frazier 9-4-0-66
Passing-OSU Loveland 0-3-0-0
Receiving-NU Bell 2-23, Muhammadn 2-22, D. Brown 2-15, Dixon 1-42,
Hawkins 1-20, Armstrong 1-8, C. Jones 1-0
Punting-NU Stigge, 4-203 (50.6)
Punting-OSU Tyner 11-358 (32.5)
Punt Returns-NU Hughes 3-43
Kickoff Returns-NU Hughes 1-19
Kickoff Returns-OSU J. White 2-41
Fumble Returns-NU Collins 1-2
Calvin Jones was the Big Eight Offensive Player of the Week, and also
received the AT&T Long Distance Award for the longest run in the nation
for the weekend.
---
Michael Nolan, [email protected] "Freedom of the press is still alive in
Tailored Software Services, Inc. America, at the U. S. Mint" (Gallagher)
Lincoln, Nebraska (402) 423-1490
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA20180; Tue, 13 Oct 92 23:56:44 -0700
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Wed, 14 Oct 92 01:47:50 -0500
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA21826; Wed, 14 Oct 92 01:57:25 CDT
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Wed, 14 Oct 92 01:52 CDT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 01:52 CDT
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Nebraska 55, Oklahoma State 0
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.721 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Oct 15 1992 13:35 | 32 |
| > And Switzer has been openly
> criticizing the OU fans for getting Gibbs' case.
Boy, you're not kiddin. Dave Logan had Barry Switzer on the telephone
during his Sports talk show last night. I don't remember his exact words
but he certainly didn't hold anything back and basically called the OU
fans a bunch of idiots who have absolutely no idea what it takes to build
and maintain a national college football power. And this comes from a guy
who still has a weekly TV show in Oklahoma 5 years after he was fired as
the OU coach. From the sound of Switzer last night, Mike Ditka could be
considered a meek and timid guy.
Later in the show, Logan asked Switzer if he'd ever coach college football
again. He said no, but he would entertain the idea of coaching in the pros.
I never liked the way Switzer ran the OU program and always rooted for the
teams he played against. With his personality, I hope he doesn't coach
college ball again. But I think he could find a place in the pros where
he would fit in just right and I think he would be successful. I hope he
gets a pro coaching job. It was very entertaining listening to his
interview last night. I came away with a little more respect for the man.
> As for the scholarship situation, OU currently has 72 scholarship
> players, but the NCAA allows 92.
Of those 72 scholarship players, I'll bet most are freshman and sophmores.
Most winning teams are still dominated by juniors and seniors. Probation
has certainly hurt OU. All the fault can not be put on Gibb's doorstep.
It should be real interesting sittin in the OU section for Sat night's
game against CU.
Keith
|
18.722 | Mort Sahl I ain't | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:20 | 19 |
| Joe,
I was referring to your last sentence about OU not getting hit with
any felonies. I took that sentence apart from the rest of your note.
I wasn't serious about you "implying" anything regarding any
school breaking rules ( thus your "Accruing felonies") and offering
that sentence as a de facto standard. I took license with your
statement and expanded as an attempt to satirize what I feel is
the attitude around certain programs' apologists. That is " Hey
we didn't get accused of any felonies, so we're ok."
That was my jab at Miami, where they accrued no felonies because they
all turned government witness. So their program is undoubtedly clean.
So I'll blame lack of sleep 'cuz of the baseball game for not
being clear. And I don't even understand if I explained it
correctly in the above paragraph. Oh well, time for some Jolt.
MikeL
|
18.723 | Disappointing, but not devastating | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:31 | 41 |
| An exciting final quarter and a half Saturday night, but overall a sloppy game
filled with plenty of mistakes by both teams.
So who shoulda won this sister-kisser?? Well, to answer that question, you
first need to pick a perspective. From OU's perspective, there's no doubt in
their mind they had this one in the bag. Not only did the Sooners have a
10-point lead on two different occasions in the 4th quarter, but the 2nd one
was with only 6 minutes left in the game - and OU had the ball! About the only
thing that could've cost the Sooners the game at this point was a turnover, and
that's exactly what happened. The Sooners had just picked off Detmer for the
5th time only to have Rasheed fumble on the very next play.
Now CU's perspective. Sure, given the situation over the last few minutes of
the game the Buffs were immediately thrilled with the tie, but after looking at
the whole game it was filled with mistakes for CU, as usual. 7 turnovers,
including a fumble down inside OU's 5-yard line, 2 very makeable field goal
attempts that were missed, and 2 defensive touchdowns by the Sooners. And
throw in a dropped interception by Chris Hudson on OU's first possession that
had 6 points written all over it and the package is complete.
The mistakes aside, the Buffs played pretty decent football. They outgained OU
by more than 100 yards, and the defense only gave up 10 points, 7 of them
coming on a long TD run by Brewer. But the problems continue to be the same
for the Buffs - turnovers, inability to run the ball, and giving up occasional
long runs, particularly up the middle. Giving up the long runs is the least
serious of the 3 problems, because the CU defense had plenty of stops behind or
at the line of scrimmage, plus this aggressive style of defense is going to
give up a few big plays now and then. The turnover problem is getting
ridiculous, however. CU is now 106th out of 107 division I-A teams in turnover
margin, but the bright side is they continue to win (or not lose in this case)
despite the turnover problems. But it's highly unlikely that this team can
continue to win games with all the turnovers and will in all likelihood cost
them the game at Lincoln in 2 weeks.
Unlike after last year's tie with Nebraska, the Buffs still can write their
ticket to the Orange Bowl by winning the rest of their games because they would
be ranked higher than the Sooners even if OU should win the rest of their
games.
Joe
|
18.724 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:14 | 9 |
| The Colorado/Nebraska war in Lincoln Nebraska on Halloween day will be
televised by ESPN with a start time of 2:00 PM Mountain time. ABC planned
to broadcast the game but ran into some type of scheduling conflict.
Almost all college football experts are picking NU to win this game.
I believe the Buffs have the better all around talent but they must
not turn the ball over like they have all year if they expect to win.
Keith
|
18.725 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:20 | 8 |
| I read this morning that ABC is televising the game at 1:30 as one of
their regional games. If ESPN does end up with this game for what ever
reason, it will be the 3rd year in a row that this game has been
relegated to the cable network.
Joe
|
18.726 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Oct 20 1992 14:01 | 11 |
| > I read this morning that ABC is televising the game at 1:30 as one of
> their regional games.
The RMN and KOA(this morning on the way to work) both reported that ABC
had to drop the game at the last minute because of scheduling conflicts
(they didn't elaborate). So, if you were reading the C.S. Gazette,
I'm pretty sure you were reading old news. It's too bad the game won't be
available to everyone who wants to tune in, but sometimes, I think the
ESPN coverage is better.
Keith
|
18.727 | CBS, please start carrying college football again... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:15 | 7 |
| No, I didn't read it in the Calhan Gazette, Keith.
Wonder why ABC had to drop it? Probably decided to pick up the ND-Navy
game. :^)
Joe
|
18.728 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:33 | 4 |
| � Wonder why ABC had to drop it? Probably decided to pick up the ND-Navy
� game. :^)
No, no, no. N(D)BC has the Notre Dame contract.
|
18.729 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:46 | 3 |
|
but Mac if I'm not mistaken NBC has a contract for only ND's home games. If
they're on the road then ABC can and usually does pick them up.
|
18.730 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:59 | 7 |
| Wail boys,
I found out today that the ND-Navy game is noon time EST start.
I have no idea if ABC is picking up the game at all. And if they
do, don't come down on my haid, willya!! Joisey awaits!
MikeL
|
18.731 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:02 | 5 |
| �but Mac if I'm not mistaken NBC has a contract for only ND's home games. If
�they're on the road then ABC can and usually does pick them up.
I thought I saw ads for the ND game on the local NBC affiliates around
here, Mike.
|
18.732 | Next weekend, Mac | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:10 | 10 |
| You might have saw the ads for THIS weekend's ND game vs. BYU
which is a home game. The Navy-ND game is Oct. 31, officially an
away game for ND at the Meadowlands. ABC could pick up the option
to televise it. I highly doubt it though. ABC is televising
the USC-ND game on Saturday night, Thanksgiving weekend and
I hope they would not opt to air this mismatch. Maybe the Mizzlou
network'll pick it up.
MikeL
|
18.733 | Orange Bowl | ROCK::MURPHY | | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:47 | 6 |
| Any feel for who will go if CU and OU both win out the string? I can't
see it happening, but have the papers mentioned it? Given that the opponent
is likely to be Miami, it may be preferable as a weak Big 8 Co-Champ to avoid
the massacre... a$ide from other con$ideration$.
Murph
|
18.734 | College football's two most hated teams | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:48 | 5 |
| Speaking of the NBC's plugs for this upcoming game against BYU, I
noticed they didn't throw in any highlights from the Stanford game. :^)
Joe
|
18.735 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:52 | 6 |
| RE: Orange Bowl
They would take the highest ranked team, which would be CU, if they
both win out the string.
Joe
|
18.736 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 09:26 | 18 |
| In your opinion of course Joe,
Do you speak for the country? That's like saying Miami is one
of the most hated teams. No wash.
BTW I saw an ad for an 800 # to order a t Shirt for the ND-BYU
game.
It says, " Battle of the Blessed"
Catholics vs. Mormons
That oughta fuel your hatred Joe. 8^)
Oh, and any team that plays the Big 8 rep in thec Orange has an
automatic W. THIS year, Big 8 sips.
JMHO
MikeL
|
18.737 | Go Buffs! | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:22 | 5 |
|
And MikeL has firsthand knowledge of what a team that "sips"
looks like! :*)
Claybroon
|
18.738 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Oct 21 1992 11:15 | 8 |
| > In your opinion of course Joe,
> Do you speak for the country? That's like saying Miami is one
> of the most hated teams. No wash.
Mike, it was meant to be a takeoff of when SI called BYU America's most hated
team. I figured ND has to be a close 2nd. :^)
Joe
|
18.739 | But the Irish WILL UNsip | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 11:51 | 6 |
| Sorry boys, I'm hypersensitive this morning. 8^)
Ouch,'bone. But the Big 8 still sips
MikeL
|
18.740 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Oct 21 1992 12:38 | 20 |
| Kordell Stewart will start for the Buffs this week against Kansas State.
McCartney says it's not at all a demotion for Detmer, just that Stewart is
healthy enough to resume his role as the starter. Kordell still has a heavily
padded cast on his nonthrowing hand and can't cradle the ball on a scramble.
Stewart, on how his injuries are doing:
Wrist: "Somwetimes I forget I have the cast. I have to hurry and switch the
ball to my right and cover it with my left. I can grip it, but I can't swing
it around."
Foot: "It's 100 percent compared to 2 weeks ago. Two weeks ago against
Missouri, on the naked running play for the first down, when I slid, it hurt to
cut under it. Yesterday, it didn't affect me at all."
It is official that the CU-Nebraska game next weekend will be on ESPN at 2pm
mountain time.
Joe
|
18.741 | Be nice to Mikey | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Wed Oct 21 1992 14:25 | 3 |
| Yea, give ol' Mikey a break. He has a big presentation today, is wearing his
bestest IBM suit. Unfortunately, as he was driving into work, he popped the
button off his collar...
|
18.742 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 14:35 | 13 |
| >Yea, give ol' Mikey a break. He has a big presentation today, is wearing his
>bestest IBM suit. Unfortunately, as he was driving into work, he popped the
>button off his collar...
Damn! I told Mike not to do so many shrugs when he was working on.
Now he's gone and got his dang-blasted neck too big for his shirts...
I could lend him my new Boston Bruins jersey that I'm wearing today.....
'Saw
|
18.743 | Hehehe | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:15 | 9 |
| Dadgum audience! What do they know about network management! Phhhht
8^).
Well, here's rooting for CU this Saturday. Nothin' agin Nebraska,
but ah thinks CU has the bestest chance of getting moidered in
the Orange.
MikeL
|
18.744 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:16 | 15 |
| > Dadgum audience! What do they know about network management! Phhhht
> 8^).
Networks are cool. Only thing more interesting than a network is
the guts of an operating system.....
Mike, you gotta stop doing them shoulder shrugs the night before
presentations. That way your neck will not be all pumped up, and you
won't be popping buttons!
'Saw
|
18.745 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:28 | 9 |
|
> Well, here's rooting for CU this Saturday. Nothin' agin Nebraska,
> but ah thinks CU has the bestest chance of getting moidered in
> the Orange.
The game is next Saturday not this Saturday, Mike - get with the program!
Joe
|
18.746 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:30 | 13 |
| >The game is next Saturday not this Saturday, Mike - get with the program!
>
>Joe
Joe, go easy on my main main MikeL, today. He popped a button and was
thrown into a room full of hungry customers!
That'd be enough to rattle anyone's brains!
'Saw
|
18.747 | Jest gave meself a dope slap Joe, Who's CU this Sat | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:40 | 7 |
| Nay 'Saw,
Twas nuttin' there to rattle. Actually pooed me button scratchin'
an itch driving 65 down 495. Listenin' to mn ND tapes of course!
8^),
MikeL
|
18.748 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:01 | 5 |
|
Hey Mikey, next time buy a shirt that fits. \
brews_who always has to wear a suit and talk to a roomful of angry
customers (especially after what MArky-Mark and his gang did to me)
|
18.749 | Ba-doom | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:21 | 7 |
| Nay Brews,
The shirt fit. It was the button-down collar thangie. No one noticed
thank the Lord....... that's cuz I purposely left me fly down.
8^),
MikeL
|
18.750 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:22 | 6 |
|
musta gone through the button crusher at the laundry. I hate when that
happens.
brews
|
18.751 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:45 | 10 |
| WEll, speaking of lowered flies:
I have been trying to start a new fashion trend where
men go around with their flies down, and one of their
shirt tails pulled out of the opening.
No luck yet, although I keep trying.....
'Saw
|
18.752 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:48 | 6 |
| -1,
How much is bail in Springfield these days, 'Sawmain??
8^),
MikeL
|
18.753 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:50 | 14 |
|
I played in a husband/wife golf tournament a couple months ago that had
three rules:
- Husbands and wives couldn't play in the same 4some
- If a guy's drive didn't reach the ladies' tee, he had to unzip his fly
and stick his shirt tail out for the rest of that hole.
- If a lady wiffed, she had to play the hole in her bra. Fortunately
for me the 2 women in my 4some were nice looking. Unfortunately for
me, they were pretty good golfers. Fortunately one of them did wiff
once.
brews
|
18.754 | Golf etiquette be damned | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:05 | 6 |
| Ah,
Dare I ask what happened when someone lost their ball(s)?
8^),
MikeL
|
18.755 | hello, hello???? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:10 | 5 |
| Where's JaKe when ya really need him????????
;^)
|
18.756 | Now, it's Nebraska Week | BSS::JCOTANCH | Beat Nebraska | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:13 | 31 |
| Major rout for the Buffs over Kansas State, 54-7. CU outgained KSU 514-17;
first downs were 30-3; of KSU's 47 offensive plays, 30 went for 0 or minus
yards; KSU's deepest penetration was their 39 (Their 7 points came on an
interception returned for a TD). Domination it was.
The CU defense was *awesome*, if you can't figure that out from the stats
above. Offensively, despite all the points, the Buffs still had some problems.
Stewart appeared close to 100 percent recovered from his injuries, but wasn't
overly accurate on his passes. He had 2 picks - one where he was under
pressure and threw up a desperate long ball, and the other was simply a poor
decision on his part and a good play by the K-State defensive player, who took
that one in the end zone for KSU's only points. Stewart looks good running and
scrambling however. On one touchdown run, he was all but stopped at the 5-yard
line but somehow managed to get in the end zone with an incredible effort.
The running game is still lacking, except when freshman Rashaan Salaam is in
there. Salaam may not be as quick or elusive as Warren in the open field, but
he's better at getting to the line of scrimmage quickly and creating his hole.
And with the troubles the offensive line is having opening up holes right now,
Salaam is the type of back they need in there to produce yardage on the ground.
Although it didn't matter in this game, the turnovers are still a problem for
CU. They had 3 interceptions and a lost fumble against KSU and were minus 2 on
turnovers for the day. This has got to be MacCartney's number one concern
going into Lincoln - it's without a doubt my biggest concern!
Freshman Tommie Frazier started for Nebraska against Missouri this past week
and will in all likelihood be the starter against the Buffs on Saturday. Grant
didn't start because of a sore back.
Joe
|
18.757 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:19 | 25 |
| The Buff defense set all kinds of team and big 8 defensive records when they
murdered K-State on Sat. The game total offensive yardage for K-State
was 16. They never got past their own 39 yard line. Their only score
came on an intercepted pass which went for a TD. DT, Leneord Renfro had an
All-American type day with a couple of sacks, a number of tackles for losses,
a few QB hurries and an interception which almost went for a TD. I hope he
doesn't opt for the pros at the end of this year. Kordell Stewart had the
best run of any Buff this year. It will certainly make any team highlight
films. It was a QB draw from the 9 yard line. The first 4 yards were easy
but on the last 5 yards, I counted at least 7 Wildcats who hit him before
he scored. Deon Figures set a new Buff record for total punt return yardage
in a game. It was 160+ yards.
Next up are the mighty Huskers. It looks like they may start freshman QB,
Tommie Frazier. He was highly recruited by CU and almost agreed to attend CU.
However, when Detmer decided to sign up, they called back Frazier and told
him to find another team.
Kansas had their biggest football victory in who knows how many years when
they beat the Sooners. Cale Gundy left the game with a shoulder injury. Does
anyone know his status for the rest of the year ? Could we see the Jayhawks
in Miami on New Years day ? Both CU and NU had to come from behind to beat
them last year. And the Buffs have to travel to Lawrence this year.
Keith
|
18.758 | early line: NEBRASKA 6 colorado | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:57 | 0 |
18.759 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Beat Nebraska | Mon Oct 26 1992 14:04 | 25 |
| > Kordell Stewart had the
> best run of any Buff this year. It will certainly make any team highlight
> films. It was a QB draw from the 9 yard line. The first 4 yards were easy
> but on the last 5 yards, I counted at least 7 Wildcats who hit him before
> he scored.
I watched the game again when it was being replayed again on Prime and it was
funny listening to the announcers. They were just kind of nonchalantly calling
the play - "...and Stewart will be stopped at about the five--NO HE'S STILL
ON HIS FEET, AND GETS INTO THE END ZONE!!!!!" They were just shell-shocked.
(okay, maybe you had to be there :^)).
> Kansas had their biggest football victory in who knows how many years when
> they beat the Sooners. Cale Gundy left the game with a shoulder injury. Does
> anyone know his status for the rest of the year ? Could we see the Jayhawks
> in Miami on New Years day ? Both CU and NU had to come from behind to beat
> them last year. And the Buffs have to travel to Lawrence this year.
I'm still not sold on KU, although they did surprise me not only by the margin
of victory but just by winning this game. Anyone who lost to Cal can't be that
good :^). (Speaking of which, how about those Cal Bears, huh, Drewski? -
they've lost 3 in a row now). KU knocked off OU 5 or 6 years ago in Lawrence.
Joe
|
18.760 | Which bowl will KU play in ? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 26 1992 15:58 | 25 |
| >I'm still not sold on KU, although they did surprise me not only by the margin
>of victory but just by winning this game. Anyone who lost to Cal can't be that
>good :^). (Speaking of which, how about those Cal Bears, huh, Drewski? -
>they've lost 3 in a row now). KU knocked off OU 5 or 6 years ago in Lawrence.
If you go back about 300 replies, you'll see that I picked the Jayhawks
to beat OU and come in 3rd in the Big 8. Part of that prediction has come
true so, yes, I think KU is for real. But I don't think KU is as good as
the Huskers and the Buffs. I expect them to lose both of those games. But if
a critical call goes KU's way or with a couple of crazy bounces of the
football, I wouldn't be totally surprised to see an upset. KU is a top 20
team but no way a top 10 team. They have a good offense that can score in
a number of different ways but their defense is very suspect especially
in the 4th quarter and especially stopping the speed players on the outside.
I expect the Husker/Jayhawk game to be a high scoring shootout with the
Huskers just having too much talent and scoring one or two more TD's.
The Buff/Kansas game will not see as much scoring, mostly because of the
Buff defense.
I was surprised to see the Huskers favored by 6 points over the Buffs this
weekend. CU has a much better defense than the Huskers and defense usually
wins the big games. The Buffs have had a serious problem with turnovers.
If the Buffs can limit the turnover's, they will win.
Keith
|
18.761 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:34 | 4 |
| Nebraska-Colorado game is in Nebraska, right??
The Crazy Met
|
18.762 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:13 | 3 |
| > Nebraska-Colorado game is in Nebraska, right??
Yep.
|
18.763 | Husker Notes Oct. 27, 1992 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Tue Oct 27 1992 15:48 | 36 |
| From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "Michael Nolan" 27-OCT-1992 10:30:50.24
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Husker Notes, Oct 27th
(NU-Missouri stats to follow, I keep forgetting to bring the paper into the
office.)
NU Freshman QB Tommie Frazier, who became the first true freshman to start
at QB in the 'modern' era at Nebraska (Devaney & Osborne), performed well
enough to earn another start this Saturday against Colorado. Coach
Osborne had kept Frazier's 1st start pretty much under wraps last week, but
announced the decision for this week's game after practice on Monday.
Frazier has requested to be excused from the press corps interviewee list.
The NU-Colorado game will be televised on ESPN, with a 3PM starting time.
ESPN has also picked up the NU-Kansas game on November 7th, with the
starting time moved to 6:30 pm. (The team voted unanimously to move the
starting time, despite Tom Osborne's personal preference against late
season games at night.)
---
Mike Nolan
[email protected]
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA29731; Tue, 27 Oct 92 09:27:55 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Tue, 27 Oct 92 11:23:57 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA21440; Tue, 27 Oct 92 11:21:48 CST
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)id <[email protected]>; Tue, 27 Oct 92 11:16 CST
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Date: Tue, 27 Oct 92 11:16 CST
% From: [email protected] (Michael Nolan)
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Husker Notes, Oct 27th
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.764 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:31 | 12 |
| >ESPN has also picked up the NU-Kansas game on November 7th, with the
>starting time moved to 6:30 pm. (The team voted unanimously to move the
>starting time, despite Tom Osborne's personal preference against late
>season games at night.)
I'm glad it's on national TV. It should be a good ball game and give a good
indication of how good the Jayhawks are relative to the other teams in
the Big 8. I don't understand Osborne's problem with late season games at
night. If there's any disadvantages, the other team has them
also. Is this game going to be played in Lincoln or Lawrence ?
Keith
|
18.765 | but OU on the road | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Oct 28 1992 10:29 | 6 |
|
Pretty sure it'll be in Lincoln. In fack, I remember a broadcast
where the announcer picked NU to win the Big 8 cuz they get CU and
KU at home........
Claybroon
|
18.766 | double ouch | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:23 | 8 |
| Ah,
Did the Buff D git snowbound in Boulder?
Wow,
CU sure took it on da chin. Severe beating.
MikeL
|
18.767 | Poor conference, with Nebraska the cream... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:38 | 11 |
|
> CU sure took it on da chin. Severe beating.
To be frank, a train wreck that's been due for a couple of years now,
but which to their credit Colorado has been able to postpone. Even the
gift tie that Oklahoma handed over in the final minutes now appears to
be a major blemish on CU's record. With a two-point win over Kansas
State, OU barely seems to be able to get out of its own way...
glenn
|
18.768 | No, triple ouch | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 02 1992 11:22 | 42 |
| I figured CU had to end up no worse than minus 2 on the turnovers to have a
chance to win. But CU ended up a minus 6 for the game, and you combine that
with the fact that CU was severely outplayed in the fundamentals of the game,
most notably CU's offense vs. NU's defense, and you get a 52-7 rout.
The turnovers were CU's biggest nemesis until about midway thru the 3rd
quarter, when NU was just started running over the Buffs and CU's offense
remained totally ineffective. The defense pretty much held their own for a
little more than a half, although a couple of penalties helped make the score
24-7 at the half. Of NU's first 31 points, 24 of them came as a result of
turnovers in CU territory. Other than the penalties, the only mistake the CU
defense made the first two-plus quarters was giving up about a 45-yard TD run,
and that was pretty much just a good play by Nebraska.
CU's offensive woes or Nebraska's defense, take your pick, may very well have
been as big a factor as the turnovers. Let's just say this: if you didn't see
the game, the CU offense resemebled the Bronco offense during recent trips to
Philadelphia and Washington. Something that turned out to be a huge factor was
CU's inability to give Detmer and Stewart some time to throw. And Nebraska
didn't blitz all that much. I didn't like Mac's decision to start Detmer. I
know that's easy to say now, but you've got a relatively inexperienced freshman
playing in a very tough road game who had already displayed how green he is
in a big game against OU, and that was at home.
Another big factor was field position. I'm not positive about these stats, but
in the first half NU started every possession but on in CU territory and CU
started every possession but one at or inside their own 20.
If there was a turning point, it came late in the 2nd half. Down 17-0, CU
mounted their only drive of the day using a no-huddle offense and cut the NU
lead to 17-7. The defense had a good series and NU was a quick 3 and out, and
after the punt CU took over at their own 44-yard line with about 2 minutes left
in the half. Finally, CU had grabbed the momentum. Even if they did nothing
with this possession, going into the locker room down 17-7 would be a moral
victory considering how the first half had gone. But on the first play, Detmer
was hit and the ball knocked loose. Combine that with the fact that NU
converted the turnover into 7 points right before the half and that can be
viewed as the knockout punch. I'm not saying CU would've won had they scored
on that drive, but it could've opened the door for an interesting 2nd half.
Joe
|
18.769 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 02 1992 12:25 | 12 |
| OK, OK, who's got directions to the Crow cafe ? My team got murdered.
I thought Nu's punter, Mike Stigge, was the player of the game. His punts
which mailed CU deep inside their 5 yard line really set the tone for the
game. Calvin Jones looks like a Barry Foster clone. He's definately the
best back for NU. Marshall Faulk and Garrison Hearst are great backs but
if Osborne played Jones full time, he'd definately be getting as much press
as Faulk and Hearst.
Hey Marty, enjoy the victory, your team played great.
Keith
|
18.770 | Beef and speed - YES SPEED - on the line... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Nov 02 1992 13:14 | 15 |
| All I can say is that this game was won in the trenches. Those turnovers were
forced. The NU line play was supperior on both sides of the ball. I will give
the CU defense credit. They played pretty well in the first half untill their
totally inept offense put too much of a burden on them.
This Frazier kid is for real. Now havent I been calling for Osborne to use him
all year? I guarantee you that this kid will be an effective passer. It's like
the 2nd comming fo Turner Gill, only Frazier has more speed. EXELLENT !!!
That is the loudest I have EVER heard a Nebraska crowd.
Lets just say that I enjoyed this one sooooo much I watched it TWICE. Hmmmmm,
I need to get a life it would seem.
Marty
|
18.771 | Where's the logic ? | CSC32::A_PARRACO | Back in Ely's Harbour | Mon Nov 02 1992 14:16 | 10 |
|
Why does everyone use the acronym CU and NU to represent:
University of Colorado
University of Nebraska
Wouldn't UC and UN be more appropriate/accurate ? I mean, why don't
they call the University of Connecticut CONNU ?
- acp
|
18.772 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:11 | 7 |
| >That is the loudest I have EVER heard a Nebraska crowd.
KOA interviewed Mac this morning. He said that CU was completely unable
to change the plays at the line of scrimmage because of the noise.
This year, many of CU's big plays were audibles.
Keith
|
18.773 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:31 | 33 |
| > All I can say is that this game was won in the trenches. Those turnovers were
> forced. The NU line play was supperior on both sides of the ball.
I can see from an NU's fan perspective how you'd think those turnovers were
forced, but I don't agree. The first play, sure, Detmer was forced to throw
quickly and threw it high but Warren should've caught it or at least dropped it
right there instead of letting it go through his fingertips. Now the fumble
right before halftime was obviously forced. These turnovers were due to the
pressure for the most part, but Koy played badly and most importantly had no
protection. But they had the same trouble against OU, and would've had the
same problems against alot of defenses this past Saturday. Nebraska was
definitely the best team CU has faced so far, although the Sooners were really
up for the CU game a couple weeks ago, especially when you consider how they've
done since then and how they played the week before against Texas. CU's
offensive line was a big question mark coming into the season, and they've lost
2 starters since the beginning of the season. They're starting to have pretty
much the same problem the Sooners have had with their passing offense -
protecting the QB.
> This Frazier kid is for real. Now havent I been calling for Osborne to use him
> all year? I guarantee you that this kid will be an effective passer. It's like
> the 2nd comming fo Turner Gill, only Frazier has more speed. EXELLENT !!!
I was very impressed with Frazier - as an option quarterback. Very quick kid.
Maybe he will become an excellent passer, but he didn't look all that great
throwing the ball.
I was surprised with the success NU had running the ball on the perimeter, yet
had some trouble running the ball up the middle early on. I thought it would
be just the opposite.
Joe
|
18.774 | NU is top-10 legit now, maybee top-5... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:45 | 12 |
| >>That is the loudest I have EVER heard a Nebraska crowd.
> KOA interviewed Mac this morning. He said that CU was completely unable
> to change the plays at the line of scrimmage because of the noise.
> This year, many of CU's big plays were audibles.
> Keith
This was our story after the Washington game. I think Nebraska has improved
as a team since Washington. I'd love to get them at Linoln now.
Marty
|
18.775 | NU will be balanced with Frazeir... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Nov 02 1992 15:53 | 42 |
| Joe, I can't agree with you on this totally...
>> All I can say is that this game was won in the trenches. Those turnovers were
>> forced. The NU line play was supperior on both sides of the ball.
>I can see from an NU's fan perspective how you'd think those turnovers were
<forced, but I don't agree. The first play, sure, Detmer was forced to throw
>quickly and threw it high but Warren should've caught it or at least dropped it
>right there instead of letting it go through his fingertips. Now the fumble
>right before halftime was obviously forced. These turnovers were due to the
>pressure for the most part, but Koy played badly and most importantly had no
>protection. But they had the same trouble against OU, and would've had the
>>same problems against alot of defenses this past Saturday. Nebraska was
>definitely the best team CU has faced so far, although the Sooners were really
>up for the CU game a couple weeks ago, especially when you consider how they've
>done since then and how they played the week before against Texas. CU's
>offensive line was a big question mark coming into the season, and they've lost
>2 starters since the beginning of the season. They're starting to have pretty
>much the same problem the Sooners have had with their passing offense -
>protecting the QB.
I'll give you the first turnover. Detmet did hit Warren right in the hands.
It was either Warren's lack of concentration or a slippery ball. This was
the 1st play of the game so the ball was probably in pretty good shape. Also
the one long pass picked off by NU was a bonehead throw. He should have just
eaten it. NU had that receiver blanketed. But this again is because Detmer barely
had time to breath back there. The NU D had CU off balance from the start.
You see it's just the opposite as NU's one-dimentional running game. NU KNEW
that CU was going to pass 90% of the time. They stayed in the dime and did not
even worry about the run. Just like Washington crammed 8 guys on the line vs
NU.
Now I'm tellin ya now. Mark this note. Frazier is going to be a very good passing
QB out of the option. I'm not saying NU will throw 40 times a game. I am saying
that NU will throw 25 times and complete 15 or more. Frazier has a VERY good arm.
You heard it here first folks.
Saturday was sweeter than sugar !!! ;^)
Husker Henderson
|
18.776 | There is another perspective outside the state of Colorado... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Nov 02 1992 16:57 | 14 |
| Get this guys. You won't like this. On the KFAB's postgame show Saturday Osborne
alluded to the fact that the "trash" that "some" of the CU fans/media "throw at"
Nebraska only serves to fire up NU more.
Now you have to realize - OSBORNE NEVER, I SAY NEVER, SPEAKS LIKE THAT IN PUBLIC
ABOUT AN OPPONENT. This was a major statement comming from Dr. Tom.
Take it for what it's worth - I think it says a lot. Perhaps CU's fans/media/
players/coaches will learn to temper their enthusiasm and confidence now.
If you think that this is just my biased attitude then you should get on the
internet and read the blasing CU is taking.
Marty
|
18.777 | Congrats NU but what a lousy flag ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | DENVER JECKYL AND HYDES | Mon Nov 02 1992 18:06 | 10 |
| That flag that flies over the stadium
<aksarbeN|
|
|
� |
|
|
/ \
Obviously created by a Alumni.
|
18.778 | Is the Big 8 a dinosaur ?? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Nov 05 1992 15:46 | 24 |
| The Colorado newspapers have reported that the PAC 10 is thinking of
expanding. The first team on their list to invite into the PAC10 is
Colorado. The 2nd team is Texas. I have also heard that the Big10 is
thinking about inviting Nebraska to join it.
Will we see the end of the Big 8 in the next 5 years ?
Would this be a good thing for Colorado and/or Nebraska ?
What would happen to Oklahoma, Kansas and the other Big 8 teams if
NU and CU leave ?
Actually, I think it would be a good thing especially if the PAC10 had
enough teams to have 2 divisions and a playoff game like the SEC. The
same can be said for the Big 10 with Penn State joining and possibly
Nebraska. The country would basically have 3 super conferences, the Big
10, the PAC 10 and the SEC. It would do a lot to narrow the field
for a national football championship.
When you look at stadium size, quality of talent and national exposure,
I think it would be good if Colorado joined the PAC 10. (Also, a lot fewer
bad weather games).
Keith
|
18.779 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Nov 05 1992 16:18 | 32 |
| > The Colorado newspapers have reported that the PAC 10 is thinking of
> expanding. The first team on their list to invite into the PAC10 is
> Colorado. The 2nd team is Texas.
9 of the 10 Pac-10 schools voted last month on whether to add Texas and
Colorado and the vote was 9-0. Most people are of course denying that the vote
took place or that the conference is going to expand, but nevertheless
expansion is probably inevitable for the Pac-10.
> Actually, I think it would be a good thing especially if the PAC10 had
> enough teams to have 2 divisions and a playoff game like the SEC.
I'm sure the other conferences are waiting to see how successful the SEC's
title game is, and if it is, these other big conferences will follow suit and
suck up the attractive schools in a minute.
> What would happen to Oklahoma, Kansas and the other Big 8 teams if
> NU and CU leave ?
My guess is the leftovers would merge with what's left of the SWC. I've also
heard that some of the SWC schools are thinking of joining the WAC. Of course,
if the Pac-10 doesn't act quickly to grab CU and Texas (or whoever they decide
to invite) the Big 8 could invite A&M and Texas. If the Big 10 adds a 12th
team I've heard they're also interested in Missouri.
As for CU going to the Pac-10, I don't think there's any question it'd be a
great move on their part. They recruit heavily in Southern California, and
this move would only strengthen their recruiting out there. I also think the
Big 8 is losing alot of appeal nationally (although I don't know why).
Joe
|
18.780 | piece o cake | FRETZ::HEISER | I didn't spell check | Thu Nov 05 1992 16:21 | 1 |
| Well at least the Arizona schools will be guaranteed 2 more wins.
|
18.781 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:06 | 11 |
| This is sounding better all the time. Let's see:
Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, + (maybe Oklahoma) -> PAC 10
Nebraska, Missouri + (maybe Oklahoma and/or Kansas) -> Big 10
Remaining Big 8 teams + Remaining SWC teams + WAC teams -> WAC
Now the PAC 10 and Big 10 would need new names. Any ideas ?
Keith
|
18.782 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:37 | 3 |
| I doubt these conferences would go beyond 12 members, Keith.
Joe
|
18.783 | boy is this stupid ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 05 1992 17:51 | 3 |
| If they get to 12 we can call them the 12 angry teams, or "TAT"
conference for short
|
18.784 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Read our Lips: Get a New Job! ;-) | Fri Nov 06 1992 09:25 | 4 |
| The PAC-12 has a nice ring to it. A not so-subliminal message
to not forget the beer.
JD
|
18.785 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 06 1992 09:36 | 3 |
| � Colorado, Texas, Texas A&M, + (maybe Oklahoma) -> PAC 10
That will further prove that most Americans don't know any geography.
|
18.786 | moving around | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Fri Nov 06 1992 10:38 | 8 |
| T would be proud of this geography.
The Big10 already has a problem with its name having added Penn St,
which has no seacoast ;-)
PAC-12 of beer fame - good un, there!
TTom
|
18.787 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Nov 09 1992 10:57 | 5 |
|
The word here is that Texas is the real prize, but Colorado is ready to
move first.
Brews
|
18.788 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 09 1992 11:39 | 27 |
| CU rebounded from the debacle at Lincoln with a very methodical 28-0 win over
Oklahoma State. Not a whole lot of emotion from either the players or the
crowd.
The Buffs finally won the turnover battle, and in a big way. OSU had 8
turnovers to CU's 1 - although you wouldn't think so by the score. None of
OSU's first-half turnovers led to CU points.
Stewart started at QB and the offense had an okay day at best against a rather
weak OSU defense. The running game was productive by CU standards this year,
producing 150 yards on the ground. They ran the ball well early - their first
drive of the game went for a TD and almost all the yardage came on the ground.
The defense continues to play great ball. They held OSU to 118 yards of total
offense and pitched their 3rd shutout in the last 5 games.
Next up is a game at question-mark Kansas that will probably decide 2nd place
in the final conference standings and where CU goes bowling. The game will be
shown regionally on ABC at 1:30 MST. If the Buffs win this game (and
presumably their last game against Iowa State), they would in all likelihood go
to the Fiesta. The Fiesta is most interested in CU, the Pac-10 runnerup, and
the Syracuse-BC winner, but are leaning more toward a CU-Syracuse/BC matchup
because that would provide more of a national appeal. If CU loses to KU they
would probably end up in the Aloha.
Joe
|
18.789 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 09 1992 11:55 | 14 |
| I got the impression the Buffs concentrated on the basics (blocking, no
turnovers) after last week's fiasco. They did not run many complicated plays
and didn't go for the home run as often as they have in most games this year.
However, the Buffs came away with a number of injuries. Their top three
running backs were all injured and had to come out. They also had to use
their 4th string tight end who was recently converted from linebacker.
This comes on top of an already banged up offensive line. However, most of
the injuries on Saturday were not that serious and many of the players
will be ready for the Kansas game.
The defense totally dominated the OSU Cowboys.
Keith
|
18.790 | This'll probably work itself out, though... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:13 | 15 |
|
> If the Buffs win this game (and
> presumably their last game against Iowa State), they would in all likelihood go
> to the Fiesta. The Fiesta is most interested in CU, the Pac-10 runnerup, and
> the Syracuse-BC winner, but are leaning more toward a CU-Syracuse/BC matchup
> because that would provide more of a national appeal.
Joe, I've been reading exactly the opposite, that the Pac-10 runner-up,
likely Arizona, is a lock for the Fiesta Bowl. Are they saying
otherwise out West? I would think that Arizona, USC, or Stanford (or
Washington in the unlikely event that they lose at Wash St.) would
provide more national appeal than BC, if not Syracuse...
glenn
|
18.791 | some matchups, IMO | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:28 | 21 |
| The runner up of the PAC-10 is, how you say, unafiliated, as in not
locked into any bowl. Most likely they'll go into the bowl alliance.
The exact bowl depends on exactly who it is and how every one else does.
Right now the majors look like
Orange Bowl Nebraska vs ? probably Florida St
Rose Bowl Washington vs Michigan
Sugar Bowl Alabama vs Miami
Cotton Bowl Texas A&M vs ? probably Notre Dame
Fiesta Bowl ? vs ? up for grabs
Right now, both Syracuse and Arizona look good for the Fiesta but
Syracuse might drop out if'n they lose to Miami, which would, of course,
upset the whole apple cart, anyhoo.
Also, Penn St who was earlier crying about being left out should count
their fortunes in the Blockbuster Bowl. They look to be headed for a
third loss at Notre Dame and already are sporting a lowly No. 21 ranking.
TTom
|
18.792 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:37 | 6 |
| If Syracuse loses to BC, BC could vbery well end up in the Fiesta Bowl.
Have to assume that Syracuse will get a second Big East loss against
Miami - not a lock, but Miami is certainly favored to win.
The Crazy Met
|
18.793 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:47 | 12 |
|
> Also, Penn St who was earlier crying about being left out should count
> their fortunes in the Blockbuster Bowl. They look to be headed for a
> third loss at Notre Dame and already are sporting a lowly No. 21 ranking.
Make that a fourth loss... which is about right for a chump bowl like
the Blockbuster. Their opponent will probably be a third-place
conference finisher, which might not be bad if the conference is the
Pac-10.
glenn
|
18.794 | Orange undefeated in Big East | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:50 | 6 |
| TCM
'Cuse lost - charitably speaking - to Ohio St so at this point they are
undefeated in the Big East.
TTom
|
18.795 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 15:27 | 8 |
|
TTom,
What I meant was if Syracuse loses to BC then they would probably end
up with 2 Big East losses.
The Crazy Met
|
18.796 | missing in action | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 15:32 | 9 |
| Hail, TCM.
I have a hard enough time keeping up with the ACC much less the Big East.
Glenn just let me know about Penn St's 3 losses and when I looked it up I
found out I had fat-fingered all records of the Penn St-BC game.
In any case, BC-'Cuse could be a goodun.
TTom
|
18.797 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 15:45 | 7 |
| > In any case, BC-'Cuse could be a goodun.
could also be a repeat of BC-ND - either way.
The Crazy Met
|
18.798 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:35 | 41 |
|
> Right now the majors look like
>
> Orange Bowl Nebraska vs ? probably Florida St
> Rose Bowl Washington vs Michigan
> Sugar Bowl Alabama vs Miami
> Cotton Bowl Texas A&M vs ? probably Notre Dame
> Fiesta Bowl ? vs ? up for grabs
Assuming none of the top 8 teams lose from here on in, this bowl layout looks
pretty much correct. However, I was thinking that ND would end up in the
Orange and FSU in the Cotton. But now that I think about it, won't the Cotton
get 2nd choice after the Sugar since A&M is ranked higher than Nebraska, so the
Cotton would naturally grab the rating-hiking Irish...correct? Or doesn't it
work that way?
> Right now, both Syracuse and Arizona look good for the Fiesta but
> Syracuse might drop out if'n they lose to Miami, which would, of course,
> upset the whole apple cart, anyhoo.
From what I'm reading, the Syracuse-BC winner is a good bet for the Fiesta, so
it sounds like they're expecting SU to lose to Miami. So if SU beats BC and
loses to Miami they still would probably go to the Fiesta from the sound of
things. A Miami loss to SU would screw things up a whole hell of alot more
than if Miami beats SU as expected.
RE: Glenn W.
I did write things a little wrong earlier. Apparently the Fiesta is looking at
a BC/Syracuse vs. Arizona/CU matchup. (In other words, Arizona vs. CU appears
to be out of the question). When told that the Wildcats would be higher ranked
than CU, Don Meyers (director of Fiesta selection committee) said, "They would
be, but we'd have to look at our best national matchup. CU is coming off the
Orange Bowl and a national championship. The TV audience would be much greater
for CU. They're definitely one of our top teams, but they have to keep
winning."
From what Meyers said it sounds like if CU and Arizona win out, the Fiesta
would still prefer the Buffs.
Joe
|
18.799 | some set, some for money | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:43 | 16 |
| Notre Dame gets into the act because they're one of the main players in
the Bowl Alliance. In fact, they have the same status as the conference
winners when it comes to consideration.
The Orange Bowl is locked into the Big 8, the Cotton Bowl to the SWC and
the Sugar Bowl to the SEC. The at large players are the ACC, the Big East
and Notre Dame. The highest rated team of these latter three plays the
highest rated of one of the locked-in bowls. Right now, that looks like
Miami, from the Big East. After that, it's all up for grabs and mostly
influenced by money.
If it kept filtering down, the nexted highest match up would be Florida
St playing Texas A&M but apparently the thinking is that the Orange Bowl
can make more money with a Florida team.
TTom
|
18.800 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:46 | 5 |
| Also they don't want a rematch of last years Bowl games unless it is #1
against #2. That affected who would play Texas A&M in the Cotton Bowl.
The Crazy Met
|
18.801 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 09 1992 16:53 | 25 |
|
> The Orange Bowl is locked into the Big 8, the Cotton Bowl to the SWC and
> the Sugar Bowl to the SEC. The at large players are the ACC, the Big East
> and Notre Dame. The highest rated team of these latter three plays the
> highest rated of one of the locked-in bowls.
Okay, stop right there. Assuming Miami and Bama win out, why wouldn't Miami be
*locked* into the Sugar with the Tide??? The talk now is centering around how
they have a choice and might go to the Orange. What's the loophole? And if
there's a loophole like that, what the hell good is the alliance?
> After that, it's all up for grabs and mostly
> influenced by money.
> If it kept filtering down, the nexted highest match up would be Florida
> St playing Texas A&M but apparently the thinking is that the Orange Bowl
> can make more money with a Florida team.
I would think the Orange would prefer ND over FSU in a flash, unless the Orange
wants someone new after having ND twice in recent years and the fact that ND is
not one of the most loved football teams in South Florida.
Joe
|
18.802 | Dem Coloraddy boys were funny! | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Mon Nov 09 1992 17:01 | 9 |
| Joe,
South Florida loves ND money. Miami feigns didn't give us a hard
time down there in 90. Theyt was too busy laughing at the BuffHaids!!
8^).
BTW Miami loves only ThugU, even if they can't answer why.
MikeL
|
18.803 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 17:04 | 10 |
|
> BTW Miami loves only ThugU, even if they can't answer why
sorta like you and ND, right Mike?? :-)
Actually that should be all the "subway alumni" who didn't go to ND
and may never have gotten near South Bend.
The Crazy Met
|
18.804 | I know why and so do they. It's kismet 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Mon Nov 09 1992 17:07 | 1 |
|
|
18.805 | Apparently it's Miami's option, if they want to duck again... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 09 1992 17:39 | 19 |
|
> Okay, stop right there. Assuming Miami and Bama win out, why wouldn't Miami be
> *locked* into the Sugar with the Tide??? The talk now is centering around how
> they have a choice and might go to the Orange. What's the loophole? And if
> there's a loophole like that, what the hell good is the alliance?
Good question. There is such an "escape clause", though, from what I
heard this past weekend on ESPN. Sounds like if a team prefers another
bowl and that bowl prefers them, they can go ahead and cut the deal.
Isn't that the way it's always been, though?
Don't expect Miami to exercise such an escape clause to play another
watered-down home game, though, unless they want to be held up to public
ridicule like not seen before in the history of backroom bowl deals,
not to mention a possible backlash in the polls that could land Alabama
at #1 in a vote between undefeateds, under the right circumstances.
glenn
|
18.806 | CLARI commentary on bowls | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Tue Nov 10 1992 10:50 | 90 |
| Article: 387
From: [email protected] (JEFF SHAIN, UPI Sports Writer)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football.college,clari.sports.top
Subject: College bowl picture is as simple as ?$!
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 15:51:40 PST
Commentary
So you think Washington's first loss has cleared up the bowl picture
and national championship race? If so, you weren't studying the bowl
manual closely enough.
Maybe it's time for a pop quiz. Everyone take out a No. 2 pencil and
answer the following questions. Those who fail must either watch the
Japan Bowl in its entirety or spend three hours in detention listening
to Keith Jackson impersonators call out ``fum-BLLLLLLLLLLLLE!''
Question No. 1: True or false -- the bowl coalition guarantees a
national title matchup every year, sort of like an annual one-game
playoff.
Answer: In your dreams. In its raw form, the current setup stands
only an 80 percent chance of bringing about a championship game if the
nation's top two teams are among coalition schools. Winners from the
Southeastern, Big Eight and Southwest conferences are still committed to
their host bowls -- the Sugar, Orange and Cotton, respectively.
If, for instance, Miami were to lose and leave Alabama No. 1 and
Texas A&M No. 2, all we would get is a war of words shouted across the
Mississippi delta. And that doesn't even consider the Big Ten and
Pacific-10 conferences, which send their champions to the Rose Bowl and
are not part of the ``Tier One'' coalition.
Question No. 2: Placement order for the Cotton, Sugar and Orange
bowls is determined by the final regular-season ratings of the SEC, SWC
and Big Eight champions. Matchups then are made by (a) the ratings of
the ACC and Big East winners and Notre Dame (b) geographical proximity
(c) the whims of bowl officials (d) ouija board.
Answer: (c) The bowls still get to select the opponent of their
choice. They don't even have to select the No. 1 team if they don't want
to, though that would destroy whatever credibility they have left. For
instance, don't be surprised if the Cotton Bowl, selecting behind the
Sugar this year, bypasses ACC champ Florida State for lower-ranked Notre
Dame and its vast TV audience.
Question No. 3: A team may decline an invitation to play in another
Tier One bowl only in the case of (a) a regular-season rematch (b) a
third straight appearance in the same bowl (c) economic reasons (d)
better parties.
Answer: All but (d). There's a lot of leeway for a school to broker
its own deal, but choosing stone crab in Biscayne Bay over Texas
barbeque isn't among the options.
Question No. 4: What exactly is meant by ``economic reasons'' in
which a school could decline an invitation?
Answer: If another bowl manages to raise its payout to at least match
that of the bowl being snubbed. Hey, you've got to keep a little
competition in this thing. But there's a catch -- once the money is
raised, it must become the bowl's minimum payout within three years.
Question No. 5: True or false -- the Fiesta Bowl gets involved in this
process only if the Nos. 1 and 2 teams come from the ACC-Big East-Notre
Dame trio.
Answer: Not so fast. There's nothing preventing Fiesta folks from
raising the stakes for a matchup of, say, No. 1 Miami vs. No. 3 Notre
Dame and lobbying the schools to exercise the ``economic reasons''
clause.
Question No. 6: The only way to keep Notre Dame out of the coalition
is if the Fighting Irish fail to (a) win six games (b) win seven games
(c) field a team.
Answer: (b) The Fighting Irish must have seven wins over Division I-A
opponents to be eligible. However, a six-win Notre Dame may participate
if mutual agreement is reached with the Tier One bowls. If Notre Dame
doesn't qualify for a Tier One bowl, it stays home.
Extra credit: What chance is there of the Tier One bowls telling a
six-win Notre Dame team to take a hike?
Answer: Virtually none, unless some conference runner-up comes in at
10-1 or 9-2, making the Tier One bowls look silly to bypass it. Even so,
it may not make a difference. Lou Holtz could put a couple of bowl
officials in a headlock and change their minds.
Question No. 7: True or false -- the coalition will finally keep bowls
from making those dumb deals before Thanksgiving, only to watch their
anointed choices lose their last two games.
Answer: Check out Penn State, which reached an agreement in May to
send the Nittany Lions to the Blockbuster Bowl. Word is bowl officials
were really impressed with what they saw in the Blue-White spring game.
True, the coalition's affiliation with six conferences will keep a
lot of other bowls tied up until the Tier One and Tier Two bowls (Gator,
Blockbuster, Hancock) have made their invitations at the end of the
regular season. But there's nothing that prohibits an independent
Southern Mississippi, currently 6-4, from brokering a deal right now
with one of the non-coalition bowls.
In addition, the Fiesta Bowl can exercise a clause known as ``Wild-
Card Saturday.'' If there is no apparent matchup of Nos. 1 and 2, Fiesta
officials have the right to invite one of the coalition's non-champions
on the last Saturday of November. However, the Fiesta Bowl must wait
until the end of the regular season to fill its second slot.
From all those puzzled looks out there, it looks like a nice crowd is
shaping up for the Keith Jackson Sound-Alike Contest.
|
18.807 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Nov 13 1992 12:42 | 15 |
| There's an article in the latest SI about the demise of the SWC. UT
and A&M desperately want out of the SWC (no big secret there), but
apparently if they leave the conference they would lose alot of state
funding and would more or less be on the shit list of the state
bigwigs. It didn't go on to say if the 2 schools would leave anyway
and suffer the consequences, but what UT and A&M are kind of hoping for
is that the bottom would fall out of the conference and those 2 would
be free to join another conference. With the rumors of Texas going to
the Pac-10 flying all over, SWC officials are gonna sit down with the
Big 8 and discuss a merger in hopes of keeping the Texas schools in the
same conference. Some of the small private schools in the SWC, most
notably SMU, are considering dropping football down to divison II or
III, or even dropping the sport entirely.
Joe
|
18.808 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 13 1992 12:45 | 5 |
| Questions about the demise of the SWC have been going on since Arkansas
left to join the SEC (and maybe even before that). When Arkansas left
there was rumblings in the Texas state legislature that they would find
a way to punish the Aggies or the Horns if they tried to leave too, so
I'm not surprised at the SI report.
|
18.809 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 16 1992 19:23 | 29 |
| So where do I start here, with the Buffs or the Iowa State Cyclones?
:^)
With CU's 25-18 win over Kansas, they're practically assured of going
to the Fiesta Bowl to meet Syracuse, assuming they can beat Iowa State
(which might not be the best of assumptions these days!). *However*,
due to Iowa STate's shocking upset of Nebraska, if OU beats NU the
Buffs will go to the Orange Bowl. Here's CU's Bowl probabilities (all
assuming they beat ISU - if they don't beat ISU, they'll probably end
up in the Aloha Bowl):
- they go to the Orange if NU loses to OU or Kansas State.
- If NU wins, CU will go to the Fiesta, assuming Bama doesn't lose. If
Bama loses, Miami and FSU may get matched up in the Fiesta and I don't
know where CU would end up - probably Cotton or Sugar.
The opponent in the Fiesta would most likely be Syracuse, but that
might not hold true if SU beats Miami. I haven't heard any talk of
what would happen if SU beats Miami.
CU had to come from behind late to beat Kansas. After the Buffs took a
14-0 first quarter lead, KU managed to go ahead 18-17 late in the 3rd
quarter. The Buffs gave up a long TD drive to KU in the 2nd quarter -
with the exception of the 2nd half of the Nebraska game, that was the
only long TD drive that CU has given up in conference play. Stewart
seems pretty well recovered from his injuries, but the biggest problem
on offense is now the line. CU had no turnovers for the first time this
season.
|
18.810 | Could get interesting | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 16 1992 21:52 | 8 |
| Take it a step further. Alabama loses either to Auburn (major rivalry)
or in the SEC championship. Florida State wins its remaining games and
the AP poll moves Florida State to #2. Miami stays at #1. Miam could
meet Florida State in the Fiesta bowl in a matchup of #1 and #2. Based
on their meeting earlier this year, not a whole lot separates the 2.
The Crazy Met
|
18.811 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Tue Nov 17 1992 07:46 | 7 |
| If Miami is #1 and FSU is #2, according to the rules of the Bowl
Alliance, the *must* meet in the Fiesta Bowl. I thik that woule be
interesting and would not allow for a Miami duckout to play another
home game at the Orange Bowl.
Dennis Faust
|
18.812 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:17 | 13 |
| > Take it a step further. Alabama loses either to Auburn (major rivalry)
> or in the SEC championship. Florida State wins its remaining games and
> the AP poll moves Florida State to #2. Miami stays at #1. Miam could
> meet Florida State in the Fiesta bowl in a matchup of #1 and #2. Based
> on their meeting earlier this year, not a whole lot separates the 2.
This is one of the scenarios I mentioned.
From a respectability standpoint, Miami can't afford to go to the Orange Bowl
now that Nebraska has lost. The Big 8 champ will not be ranked all that high.
Joe
|
18.813 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:39 | 15 |
|
> If Miami is #1 and FSU is #2, according to the rules of the Bowl
> Alliance, the *must* meet in the Fiesta Bowl. I thik that woule be
> interesting and would not allow for a Miami duckout to play another
> home game at the Orange Bowl.
I believe nixing a rematch is one of the loopholes that a team can
exercise to go with another bowl. The big one is "economic hardship",
which basically means that if another bowl puts up bigger bucks (which
they'd also have to offer to future invitees for two years subsequent),
a team can also turn down an invitation. The Alliance is full of
loopholes...
glenn
|
18.814 | go for the money | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:57 | 12 |
| The Alliance was formed to make money for those involved. I think the
safest rule to follow in predicting - and understanding - the matchups is
to look for the bowl matchups that will generate the most money.
One of the great "loopholes" of the Alliance is that bowls like the
Fiesta can up the ante to attract a particular matchup.
But lest we think that only the alliance members are in it for the money,
we should all remember that the granddaddy of them all, the Rose Bowl, is
the richest of them all.
TTom
|
18.815 | From my recollection | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Nov 17 1992 11:10 | 7 |
| re: .813
Actually the rematch loophole is a rematch from a Bowl the year before;
I don't remember one for an in-season game.
The Crazy Met
|
18.816 | Is this a new trend in college football? | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Nov 19 1992 10:45 | 12 |
| The Sooners didn't practice yesteday and had a "team meeting" instead.
Reportedly, it wasn't a walkout or protest of any kind, just a meeting
between some players and coaches about certain players not getting
enough playing time and the QB position. Apparently the players prefer
Steve Collins over Gundy.
KOA interviewed a long-time sportscaster from Oklahoma City last night,
and he was asked what Gibbs' predicament might be if OU loses to NU and
finished 5-4-2, and he felt certain that Gibbs would be back next year.
Joe
|
18.817 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 23 1992 16:29 | 29 |
| After a fairly impressive first half and a 28-3 lead going into
halftime, the Buffs went thru the motions in the 2nd half and beat Iowa
State 31-10. Michael Westbrook and Charles Johnson both went over
1000 yards receiving for the season, only the 4th pair of receivers in
NCAA history to do this.
Nebraska plays at Oklahoma on Friday in a game that will determine
where 4 Big Eight schools will spend the bowl season.
If Nebraska wins:
NU goes to Orange (assuming NU beats Kansas State on Dec. 5th)
CU goes to Fiesta or Sugar
KU goes to Aloha
OU stays home
If Oklahoma wins:
CU goes to Orange
NU goes to Fiesta or Sugar
OU goes to Aloha
KU goes ??????
The opponent in the Orange would most likely be Notre Dame.
The oppoennt in the Fiesta would most likely be Syracuse.
The opponent would be the Bama-Florida winner.
The opponent in the Aloha will be BYU.
Joe
|
18.818 | ISU brought the young Huskers back to earth... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:03 | 28 |
| I believe that Nebaska will win Friday. If the weather is bad then ALL bets
are off.
I don't want to go into WHY I think NU is going to win. I don't have time.
Just let me say that NU is the better team and they have the most motivation
in my opinion.
CU is not a top-10 team in reality. On paper they are because of their record
but they have played a very weak schedule this year. The only real top-10
caliber team they played exposed CU's weakness - the interior lines! If CU
gets a really good opponent in their bowl then that weakness will be exposed
again, uh, in my opinion, that is.
If CU can get better on the O and D lines then they can be a really good team.
I think Nebraska is better than they were when they played Washington. NU had
Grant at QB then. Frazier is vastly supperior over Grant in every phase of the
game. NU's defense has been up and down. Great at times and not-so-great at
others.
With NU's youth I think they have no where to go but up. I see NU as a top-5
contender in '93. If CU can beef up that line and add some speed and experience
then it could get very interesting.
I'm not even worried about Friday's game. Huskers by > 14. As of today I hear
the weather should be ok. If Huskers loose then I will eat crow again. ;^)
Husker Henderson
|
18.819 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:28 | 24 |
|
> CU is not a top-10 team in reality. On paper they are because of their record
> but they have played a very weak schedule this year. The only real top-10
> caliber team they played exposed CU's weakness - the interior lines! If CU
> gets a really good opponent in their bowl then that weakness will be exposed
> again, uh, in my opinion, that is.
Maybe they're not one of the best 10 teams in the nation, but they're certainly
ranked at least as high as they deserve to be given the record. There's 3
teams ahead of them with 2 losses, and when you look at some of the upsets that
have occured around the country, you gotta credit the Buffs for staying out of
that category. No, their schedule hasn't been very tough and their 1 loss was
a blowout, but with the exception of OU they've won when they were expected to.
> If CU can get better on the O and D lines then they can be a really good team.
CU did have alot of trouble with the trap plays this year, but they also had
some injuries on the d-line. The offensive line is my big concern even though
they have alot of young talent there. Next year could be somewhat the opposite
for CU - they're losing a number of starters on defense but return everyone on
offense. The schedule is very difficult next year.
Joe
|
18.820 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Nov 25 1992 12:51 | 25 |
| I've been too busy to get into SPORTS much in the last couple of
weeks so I must say that I've been very happy with the way the Buffs
played the last 3 weeks. I especially like the lack of turnovers, the
emergence of James Hill at running back and the play of Kordell Stewart
at QB. I think they'll make a good showing in a bowl game.
The following CU players made 1st string All Big 8:
Deon Figures(CB), Chad Brown(LB), Greg Biekert(LB),
Ronnie Woolfork(LB), Leonard Renfro(DL), Michael Westbrook(WR),
Jim Hansen(OL)
The following CU players made 2nd string All Big 8:
Kordell Stewart(QB), Charles Johnson(WR), Christian Fauria(TE)
Deon Figures was named Big 8 defensive player of the year. He only allowed 5
receptions when the ball was thrown his way this year but he has 5 or 6 ints.
You'll be watchin him on Sundays next year. I think he'll be the first DB
picked in the draft.
Does anybody have the complete list of All Big 8 players ? We haven't
received our paper the last couple of days because of the snow.
Keith
|
18.821 | Huskers RULE Big-8 !!! | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Nov 30 1992 13:19 | 21 |
| NU over OU 33-9. Yesssss !!! Bring on KSU. Huskers are smellin oranges and
KSU is simply fuel for the fire.
I must admit that I was pretty concerned in that 1st half. NU did not look
good. If it had not beef for the interception returned for a TD...
NU started to pull it together about mid-was thru the second quarter. Perhaps
some of the OU emotion fell off? By halftime I could tell that the good guys
from the north would be alright.
Scarry thing about it (for other big-8 teams) is that next year Nebraska will
return 3 of 5 starting lineman, the "we backs", 2 ends, and the QB. I'm not
sure about the defense but I look for NU to return to national prominance.
Go Big Red!!!
Better days are ahead of OU.
CU, pack your tacos. (Is it Fiesta or do we know yet?)
Marty
|
18.822 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 30 1992 16:13 | 16 |
|
I really thought the Sooners would put up a good fight playing at home with a
chance to go to a bowl, but after the first quarter and a half or so OU just
looked terrible. OU probably played their best game of the year in the opener
against Texas Tech. I've become less and less impressed with Gundy as the
season wore on. Meanwhile, Nebraska seems to have gotten it back together
after the shocker at Iowa State.
> CU, pack your tacos. (Is it Fiesta or do we know yet?)
If Bama beats Florida as expected it will be CU vs. Syracuse in the Fiesta
Bowl. I think that would be a very entertaining game with the 2 wide open
offenses. If Bama loses CU will end up in the Sugar or Blockbuster.
Joe
|
18.823 | Sooners are a real mess... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 30 1992 17:15 | 23 |
|
Cale Gundy is terrible. His throwing motion has dropped lower than
Bernie Kosar's, but he doesn't have the smarts or the poise that
Bernie does. Gary Gibbs is also clueless, again making the least of
the game opportunities that presented themselves (can 3 years of
giveaways against Texas, followed by the same this year against
Colorado and Oklahoma State just be coincidence?). Again and again
Keith Jackson made the point in response to the heavy booing at Owen
Field that OU has committed to the passing offense with Gundy and
that Gibbs would stick with him. Fine, but why all the up-the-gut
running plays on 2nd-and-long down 15 points late in the game?
What more is there to say? I thought that OU did show up, and the
defense was hitting in the first half, but when you've had three good
drives and 160 yards total offense to start the game and your opponent
has run three plays for 6 yards but you're down 7-6 on the scoreboard,
it's tough to keep your chin up when you're outmanned and a heavy
underdog. The score should have been 13-0, minimum, and that might
have made it a different game, but the Gibbs/Gundy combination
was too much to overcome.
glenn
|
18.824 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 30 1992 17:50 | 11 |
| That's a good point about OU's offense, Glenn: they just don't seem to
throw the ball a whole lot. I would like to see their percentage of
pass vs. run plays for the season. They didn't pass all that much last
season, but they did in the bowl and I thought they were *really* gonna
turn it loose this season, yet I recall looking at box scores where OU
didn't even put the ball up 20 times during a game. That's not going
to a passing offense. I would still expect OU to improve quite a bit
next year with a new QB and some help on the offensive line.
Joe
|
18.825 | My impression of Gundy | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 30 1992 18:07 | 7 |
| If the Sooner's are ahead by 2 TD's at the start of the 2nd half, Gundy
looks like a great QB. If it's a close game or they're behind, he chokes
big time. It's happened time and time again over the last 3 years. And
this is from a guy who was hailed to be the 2nd coming of John Elway when
he was recruited out of H.S.
Keith
|
18.826 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:26 | 16 |
| CU first team All Big 8 offensive lineman, Jim Hansen was awarded a
Rhodes scholarship yesterday. There were only 32 Rhodes scholarship's given
out this year in all of the United States.
Deon Figures was awarded the Jim Thorpe throphy as the nation's best
defensive back. It will be interesting to see what kind of a pro he
turns out to be. I've never thought of him as a big hitter ala a Rod Woodsen
or Ronnie Lott but he can cover a receiver as well as any defensive back
I've ever seen.
For a while there on Sat., it looked like the Buffs might end up in the
Blockbuster bowl but the Crimson Tide pulled through when their backs were
up against the wall. I'm glad because I think the Fiesta bowl will have
a terrific matchup and may be one of the most exciting games on Jan 1.
Keith
|
18.827 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:42 | 6 |
| Any Buff fans out there remember defensive lineman, Garry Howe ?
He's been sharing time at nose tackle with Joel Steed for the Steelers.
Yesterday, they played him at running back in goal line situations ala
the fridge. His blocks looked crushing but they didn't score.
Keith
|
18.828 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 16:46 | 4 |
| Garry "Stumpy" Howe, has been a mainstay at the resurgence of the
STEELER defense this year.
JaKe
|
18.829 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 07 1992 19:06 | 12 |
| > Garry "Stumpy" Howe, has been a mainstay at the resurgence of the
> STEELER defense this year.
I knew the people in Pittsburgh would love this guy. Nobody drafted him.
He came in as a free agent. The press and the scouts said he was too short
or too slow or too... The only thing is that he keeps stickin his head in the
middle of the action and never gives up and somehow finds a way to make
the big play. His play seems to inspire the rest of the team. Just like
when he played at Colorado. I hope they give him the ball next time he's
lined up at running back.
Keith
|
18.830 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Back to work, still in pain! | Mon Dec 07 1992 19:12 | 6 |
| When he's playing nose tackle, or just in the line somewhere, he ALWAYS
seems to be around the ball. The guy is short and wide(sorta like me),
and is one helluva good defensive lineman.
JaKe
|
18.831 | Maybe a good nickel guy | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Tue Dec 08 1992 11:03 | 6 |
| I think Figures is overated myself. I watched him get burnt this
year, and he doesn't seem to be real smart when it comes to returns.
This is just from the games I saw him play against some good teams,
not the ones that CU blewout.
Tim
|
18.832 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 08 1992 11:36 | 13 |
| Tim, I believe Figures was burned for a TD in the Baylor game early in
the year. Was that the game you were thinking about ? The last issue of
Buffalo Sports News had an article on him. They said that the coaches
have so much confidence in him that they regularly line him up against
the opposition's best receiver and then double team the 2nd best receiver.
It also said that he is a great all around athlete and can high jump 6 1/2
feet, long jump 23 feet and walk the width of the football field standing
on his hands(of course you don't cover receivers walking on your hands).
I don't think he's overrated but I think he got off to a slow start this
year. It'll be interesting to see where he goes in the draft.
Keith
|
18.833 | Orange Bowl '93 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Dec 10 1992 13:17 | 12 |
| Nebraska vs FSU in the Orange Bowl.
Mail in the stats. While the Huskers have improved their team speed I do not
think they have the speed to contend with the 'Noles. I say FSU will win. It's
just a matter of how big.
I will say that I think Nebraska has the ability to keep it close - but they
will not win.
I wanted N.D. in the Orange Bowl. Huskers can beat them.
Marty
|
18.834 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Thu Dec 10 1992 14:22 | 14 |
|
Jeez and people wonder why Nebraska gets decimated in the bowls.
The team and coaching staff must have the same attitude as you,
Marty. Mail in the stats indeed. I realize you're trying to look
at it objectively but you mention that the Huskers have the ability
to keep it close. Well why not add a little heart and say they can do
it! Anything can happen in a bowl game.
Dang glad you're not a ND backer wif dat attitude.
C'mon, whar's your school spirit??
MikeL
|
18.835 | Just got my new CORNHUSKER hat in time for Jan 1 | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Dec 10 1992 18:19 | 11 |
| Nebraska will go back to Colorado, Kansas form and put a hurt'n
on those Seminoles. Fl State will be victimized by early turnover's
and will never recover. You heard it here first, take the 10 + points
and you'll be thanking me on January 4th when your Christmas bills
are paid. 8*)
I disagree that they would have an easier time with ND. The key to
beating Fl. State is to keep Ward contained and let him make the
bad throws. If they can't contain him it could be a shootout.
Jimbo
|
18.836 | Noles, but by how much | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Thu Dec 10 1992 18:33 | 14 |
| Jimbo,
Florida State has shown that as long as they aren't playing Miami, they
can recover from almost anything the other team does - like try to
contain Ward - and from multiple turnovers and still win.
I agree with the assessment that picking the winner is easy: Florida
State. I think the margin will be a function of how many big plays they
give up to Nebraska.
BTW, isn't one of the twin backs hurt? Will he be playing in the Orange
Bowl?
TTom
|
18.837 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Dec 10 1992 19:16 | 10 |
| I don't know what happened but I did notice that Calvin Jones
had all the yards in the K state game. Marty would probably
know what's up with Brown.
I'm up in the air about Ward. I've seen him look great at times
and terrible at times. I think his biggest asset is his threat
to run. If he's forced to stay in the pocket he's a little above
average as a QB.
Jimbo
|
18.838 | Ward on the offensive | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Fri Dec 11 1992 08:12 | 8 |
| Ward and the Noles really helped their offense when they went to the
shotgun. This gives Ward a little extra time to look down field and see
what's happening. The benefit has been the long ball and big play. If you
look at the Florida State-Virginia game, where they scored something like
13, and compare it to the Florida State-Florida game, where they scored
40 something, they don't even look like the same team.
TTom
|
18.839 | FSU will be 'Waterlood' in the Orange | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Fri Dec 11 1992 08:53 | 1 |
|
|
18.840 | Can't believe I'm reading this | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Dec 11 1992 10:13 | 8 |
| Hey, what the hell you guys doin' - noting after you've downed a 12-pack?
FSU will beat Nebraska by *at least* 14.
Ward has improved dramatically as the season went on. Early on he
threw like 5 picks against each Duke and Clemson.
Joe
|
18.841 | FSU over NU, 45-21 | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Dec 11 1992 11:22 | 10 |
| For a major bowl team, NU's defense is average at best. NU does have a great
ground game but FSU just might have the best all around offense in
college. There's gonna be some serious points scored in this game but not
nearly enough by NU. If the game were held in Lincoln, NU would have a
fighting chance. But in FSU's home state and with Osborne's horrible bowl
record, I've got to take FSU against the spread.
Now, anyone wanna talk about the CU/Syracuse game ?
Keith
|
18.842 | Buff news | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:39 | 45 |
| On NBC's NFL pre-game show yesterday, they talked about who would be the
top picks in each position in the upcoming NFL draft. For defensive line,
they had Eric Curry, for offensive line they had Lincoln Kennedy, for
defensive back they had Deon Figures and for wide receiver, hold on to
your hats...., they had Michael Westbrook. It doesn't surprise me that
the pro's are drooling over Westbrook but this is the first I've heard of
any possibility of him coming out early. In fact, I'm not aware if anybody
has even asked him if he is thinking about coming out 2 years early.
Westbrook came from a poor family and I'm afraid that when he hears his
name mentioned as the top pro wide receiver prospect on national TV, the
temptation may become too much and he'll skip his last 2 years of college.
Leonard Renfro has also been reported as thinking about jumping ship and
entering the pro's. If he does, I think it will be an even more serious loss
than Westbrook going pro. I'm not saying that Renfro is the more valuable
player but the defense will be losing some other key players like Biekert,
Brown, Figures, Elder and Bradford. If they also lose Renfro, they will
have some major rebuilding to do. They will also lose a very entertaining
person to interview in post game shows. BTW, the Buffs have never had a
player leave early to turn pro.
On the offensive side, the Buffs only have one senior in a starting position.
Jim Hansen's replacement will be 315 lb freshman, Chris Naeole from Hawaii.
His nickname is "The Big Island". He was redshirted this year. The coaches
think he has the potential to become one of the best offensive linemen in the
history of Buffalo football.
Vance Joseph, junior 2nd string QB, who was redshirted last year because
of a shoulder injury, is thinking about trying out for a position at
defensive back. The coaches think he's a great athlete and has the potential
to win a starting position if he chooses to make the switch. If he does,
it will be difficult to redshirt Detmer next year.
Now, how about Lamont Warren ? He had a difficult year after a sensational
freshman year. He doesn't appear durable enough to make the pros as a
running back. But I think he has the speed and athletic ability to be a
top defensive back. He could also be redshirted a year. Also, it's been
reported that freshman, Nathan Campbell, who was reshirted this year, just
may be the best running back on the team. With Hill running well and
Rashaan Salaam looking good and Campbell waiting in the wings, I'm not sure
there's a place for Warren in the backfield. This is all pure speculation
on my part. I have not heard of any potential switches for Warren in the
media.
Keith
|
18.843 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:48 | 7 |
|
>> BTW, the Buffs have never had a player leave early to turn pro.
That could al change with the threatened salary cap on rookies.
If he comes out Marvin Jones, from my favorite college team and the
best team in the country right now the Seminoles, would probably go
number one depending on who was drafting first.
|
18.844 | Orange Bowl '93 | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Dec 17 1992 13:34 | 36 |
| To answer a question a few notes back: Brown did not play in the KSU game
because of a "minor" shoulder injury in the Oklahoma game. Report is that
he will be ready for the Orange Bowl.
Now to answer another previous note. Someone was talking about me showing
disloyalty to my team because I said "mail in the stats" for the NU/FSU
Orange Bowl game.
When a child burns it's fingers on a hot oven a few times that child learns
to not touch that hot oven again. When a Husker fan places his hopes on the
team in a big bowl and gets burned time after time that fan learns to not
expect much in the bowl.
I did state that due to the fact that Nebraska is an improved team over the
past 3 or 4 years I think they will do better than some of those years.
However, reality is that FSU has too much team speed plus:
FSU home crowd
Nebraska does not traditionally do as well on natural turf as they do
on artificial. Nu has not played any games this year on real turf.
FSU has a good offensive line. NU's only hope of stopping the passing
game is a fierce rush as they had vs Colorado. FSU's and CU's O lines
should not even be mentioned in the same note!
I see NU coming out very emotional and staying with FSU for a while. My thinking
is that if NU can finish within 14 points of FSU they played a good game.
I hope I'm wrong,
GO HUSKERS !!!
Later,
Marty
|
18.845 | NU 31 FlSt 28 | DEMING::MCKAY | | Fri Dec 18 1992 16:54 | 4 |
| Marty you have to think positive. Huskers will suprise everyone
and win this game outright!
Jimbo
|
18.846 | It could have been a much better game... | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Jan 04 1993 12:05 | 26 |
| I hate to say so but "I told you so".
Huskers, the class of the big-8 this year, could not keep up with FSU. FSU was
the better team. I got the feeling that FSU was coasting in the second half.
Was I the ONLY person in America who was watching this game? ;^)
Nebraska just self destructed in the first half. Think about it. NU GAVE them
a TD on the really bad pitch which resulted in FSU getting the ball on the 3
yard line. Plus NU missed 2 very makeable field goals. Folks, if NU had not
given FSU 7 and denied themselves of 6 then it is a 13 - 13 tie at the half.
Second half the rains came and FSU out-Nebraska'd Nebraska with ball control.
Play this game in Lincoln and it's a very good game with FSU a 3 point favorite.
Play this game in a bowl in Florida and it's FSU fairly easy.
Difference between last year and this year: Nebraska looked like they belonged
on the field with FSU. Last year vs Miami NU looked like they did not belong.
So I say Nu is getting better but still has a ways to go. I think the Freshman
QB learned a lot from his many Freshman mistakes.
Hey, it's not just Nebraska folks. CU is 1 - 5 in bowls in the "McArtney era".
The Big-8 sips on a national scale. Face it.
Husker Henderson
|
18.847 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Jan 04 1993 12:13 | 17 |
| Marty,
I watched the game too and I'll tell ya, the rain and the field
conditions were teriffic!
This girly-mon astroturf should be banned - gimme mud!
I was on your side and when they had the close up of a Husker towards
the end of the game, Huskers loosing, and the guy mouths "I AIN'T
QUITTING"! I really felt proud for him.
That's competitive sports!
I remain,
suprised DEC sprang for a 1993 appointment book!
Kev
|
18.848 | NBC's coverage sucked | CSC32::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Mon Jan 04 1993 18:43 | 11 |
| Yes, I was really proud of that also. "Were not quitin" !!!
Did you notice that the NBC team said NOTHING about it. And when they would
highlight an NU player on the screen there would be SILENCE. When they put an
FSU player's profile up they would go on and on about how great he was?
Give me a break.
Husker are gettin better. Next year could be exciting !!!
Marty
|
18.849 | I got this over the Usenet... Big_8 Bowl Records | MOSPRT::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Wed Jan 06 1993 10:44 | 289 |
| As I stated earlier, I've collected some trivia concerning the Big 8
when it comes to bowl games. It took some time to do this and there
are probably some glitches on my part; please feel free to let me
know about them so I can make the necessary corrections.
I'd like to take this moment to thank Mike Nolan for managing the
Huskers list and my hope that he will continue to do so in 1993.
Go Big Red!
Dave
-------------------------------- cut here ---------------------
Notes:
All Opponents: Assumed to be in their 1992 conferences with these
exceptions:
1. Arkansas: SWC until it joined the SEC in 1992
2. Miami, Pitt and Syracuse: Independent until the 1991 season
3. Penn State: Independent until the 1993 season
4. Fordham is listed as Unknown since I don't know if the Rams
play football in Division 1A (I think that they are either 1AA
or Division 2 now)
Colorado
Record: 5-12 Blockbuster 0-1, Bluebonnet 2-2, Cotton 0-1, Freedom 0-2,
Fiesta 0-1, Gator 0-1, Liberty 1-1, Orange 2-3
Conferences: ACC 1-0; Big East 0-1; Big 10 0-1; Independent 2-1;
Pac 10 0-1; SEC 1-4; SWC 1-3; WAC 0-1
Cotton Bowl 01-01-38 Rice 28 Colorado 14
Orange Bowl 01-01-57 Colorado 27 Clemson 21
Orange Bowl 01-01-62 Louisiana St. 25 Colorado 7
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-23-67 Colorado 31 Miami (FL) 21 (Extinct)
Liberty Bowl 12-13-69 Colorado 47 Alabama 33
Liberty Bowl 12-12-70 Tulane 17 Colorado 3
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-31-71 Colorado 29 Houston 17 (Extinct)
Gator Bowl 12-30-72 Auburn 24 Colorado 3
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-27-75 Texas 38 Colorado 21 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-77 Ohio State 27 Colorado 10
Freedom Bowl 12-30-85 Washington 20 Colorado 17
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-31-86 Baylor 21 Colorado 9 (Extinct)
Freedom Bowl 12-29-88 Brigham Young 20 Colorado 17
Orange Bowl 01-01-90 Notre Dame 21 Colorado 6
Orange Bowl 01-01-91 Colorado 10 Notre Dame 9
Blockbuster Bowl 12-28-91 Alabama 30 Colorado 25
Fiesta Bowl 01-01-93 Syracuse 26 Colorado 22
Iowa State
Record: 0-4 All American 0-1, Liberty 0-1, Peach 0-1, Sun 0-1
Conferences: ACC 0-2; SEC 0-1; SWC 0-1
Sun Bowl 12-18-71 Loiuisiana St. 33 Iowa State 15 (Extinct)
Liberty Bowl 12-18-72 Georgia Tech 31 Iowa State 20
All American Bowl 12-20-78 Texas A&M 28 Iowa State 12 (Extinct)
Peach Bowl 12-31-77 N.C. State 24 Iowa State 14
Kansas
Record: 2-5 All American 0-1, Aloha 1-0, Bluebonnett 1-0, Liberty 0-1,
Orange 0-2, Sun 0-1
Conferences: ACC 0-2; Independent 0-2; SEC 0-1; SWC 1-0; WAC 1-0
Orange Bowl 01-01-48 Georgia Tech 20 Kansas 14
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-16-61 Kansas 33 Rice 7 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-69 Penn State 15 Kansas 14
Liberty Bowl 12-17-73 N.C. State 31 Kansas 18
Sun Bowl 12-26-75 Pitt 33 Kansas 19 (Extinct)
All American Bowl 12-31-81 Mississippi St 10 Kansas 0 (Extinct)
Aloha Bowl 12-25-92 Kansas 23 BYU 20
Kansas State
Record: 0-1 Independence 0-1
Conferences: Big 10 0-1
Independence Bowl 12-11-82 Wisconsin 14 Kansas State 3
Missouri
Record: 8-11 All American 1-0, Bluebonnett 1-0, Citrus 1-0, Cotton 0-1,
Fiesta 0-1, Gator 1-2, Holiday 0-1, LA Xmas Festival 0-1,
Liberty 1-1, Orange 1-3, Sugar 1-1, Sun 1-0,
Conferences: ACC 2-3; Big 10 0-1; Independent 2-1; Pac 10 0-2; SEC 4-1;
SWC 0-1; WAC 0-1; Unknown 0-1
LA XMAS Fest: 12-25-24 Southern Cal 20 Missouri 7 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-40 Georgia Tech 21 Missouri 7
Sugar Bowl 01-01-42 Fordham 2 Missouri 0
Cotton Bowl 01-01-46 Texas 40 Missouri 27
Gator Bowl 01-01-49 Clemson 24 Missouri 23
Gator Bowl 01-02-50 Maryland 20 Missouri 7
Orange Bowl 01-01-60 Georgia 14 Missouri 0
Orange Bowl 01-02-61 Missouri 21 Navy 14
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-22-62 Missouri 14 Georgia Tech 10 (Extinct)
Sugar Bowl 01-01-66 Missouri 20 Florida 18
Gator Bowl 12-28-68 Missouri 35 Alabama 10
Orange Bowl 01-01-70 Penn State 10 Missouri 3
Fiesta Bowl 12-23-72 Arizona State 49 Missouri 35
Sun Bowl 12-29-73 Missouri 34 Auburn 17 (Extinct)
Liberty Bowl 12-23-78 Missouri 20 Louisiana St. 15
All American Bowl 12-29-79 Missouri 24 South Carolina 14 (Extinct)
Liberty Bowl 12-27-80 Purdue 28 Missouri 25
Citrus Bowl 12-19-81 Missouri 19 Southern Miss 17
Holiday Bowl 12-23-83 Brigham Young 21 Missouri 17
Nebraska
Record: 14-16 Citrus 0-1, Cotton 1-2, Fiesta 0-4, Gotham 1-0,
Liberty 0-1, Orange 5-8, Rose 0-1, Sugar 3-1, Sun 2-0
Conferences: ACC 1-6; Big East 0-1; Big 8 0-1; Big 10 0-1; Independent 2-2;
Pac 10 0-2; SEC 9-2; SWC 2-2
Rose Bowl 01-01-41 Stanford 21 Nebraska 13
Orange Bowl 01-01-55 Duke 34 Nebraska 7
Gotham Bowl 12-15-62 Nebraska 36 Miami (FL) 34 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-64 Nebraska 13 Auburn 7
Cotton Bowl 01-01-65 Arkansas 10 Nebraska 7
Orange Bowl 01-01-66 Alabama 39 Nebraska 28
Sugar Bowl 01-02-67 Alabama 34 Nebraska 7
Sun Bowl 12-20-69 Nebraska 45 Georgia 6 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-71 Nebraska 17 Louisiana St. 12
Orange Bowl 01-01-72 Nebraska 38 Alabama 6
Orange Bowl 01-01-73 Nebraska 40 Notre Dame 6
Cotton Bowl 01-01-74 Nebraska 19 Texas 3
Sugar Bowl 12-31-74 Nebraska 13 Florida 10
Fiesta Bowl 12-26-75 Arizona State 17 Nebraska 14
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-31-76 Nebraska 27 Texas Tech 24 (extinct)
Liberty Bowl 12-19-77 Nebraska 21 N. Carolina 17
Orange Bowl 01-01-79 Oklahoma 31 Nebraska 24
Cotton Bowl 01-01-80 Houston 17 Nebraska 14
Sun Bowl 12-27-80 Nebraska 31 Mississippi St 17 (Extinct)
Orange Bowl 01-01-82 Clemson 22 Nebraska 15
Orange Bowl 01-01-83 Nebraska 21 Louisiana St. 20
Orange Bowl 01-02-84 Miami (FL) 31 Nebraska 30
Sugar Bowl 01-01-85 Nebraska 28 Louisiana St. 10
Fiesta Bowl 01-01-86 Michigan 27 Nebraska 23
Sugar Bowl 01-01-87 Nebraska 30 Louisiana St. 15
Fiesta Bowl 01-01-88 Florida St. 31 Nebraska 28
Orange Bowl 01-02-89 Miami (FL) 23 Nebraska 3
Fiesta Bowl 01-01-90 Florida St. 41 Nebraska 17
Citrus Bowl 01-01-91 Georgia Tech 45 Nebraska 21
Orange Bowl 01-01-92 Miami (FL) 22 Nebraska 0
Orange Bowl 01-01-93 Florida State 27 Nebraska 14
Oklahoma
Record: 19-11 Bluebonnett 0-2, Citrus 0-1, Fiesta 1-1, Gator 2-1,
Orange 11-5, Sugar 4-1, Sun 1-0
Conferences: ACC 8-2; Big 8 1-0; Big 10 1-0; Independent 3-1; Pac 10 0-2;
SEC 3-4; SWC 2-2; WAC 1-0
Orange Bowl 01-02-39 Tennessee 17 Oklahoma 0
Gator Bowl 01-01-47 Oklahoma 34 N.C. State 13
Sugar Bowl 01-01-49 Oklahoma 14 North Carolina 6
Sugar Bowl 01-02-50 Oklahoma 35 Louisiana St. 0
Sugar Bowl 01-01-51 Kentucky 13 Oklahoma 7
Orange Bowl 01-01-54 Oklahoma 7 Maryland 0
Orange Bowl 01-02-56 Oklahoma 20 Maryland 6
Orange Bowl 01-01-58 Oklahoma 48 Duke 21
Orange Bowl 01-01-59 Oklahoma 21 Syracuse 6
Orange Bowl 01-01-63 Alabama 17 Oklahoma 0
Gator Bowl 01-02-65 Florida St. 36 Oklahoma 19
Orange Bowl 01-01-68 Oklahoma 26 Tennessee 24
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-31-68 Southern Meth 28 Oklahoma 27 (Extinct)
Bluebonnet Bowl 12-31-70 Alabama 24 Oklahoma 24 (Extinct)
Sugar Bowl 01-01-72 Oklahoma 40 Auburn 22
Sugar Bowl 12-31-72 Oklahoma 14 Penn State 0
Orange Bowl 01-01-76 Oklahoma 14 Michigan 6
Fiesta Bowl 12-25-76 Oklahoma 41 Wyoming 7
Orange Bowl 01-02-78 Arkansas 31 Oklahoma 6
Orange Bowl 01-01-79 Oklahoma 31 Nebraska 24
Orange Bowl 01-01-80 Oklahoma 24 Florida St. 7
Orange Bowl 01-01-81 Oklahoma 18 Florida St. 17
Sun Bowl 12-26-81 Oklahoma 40 Houston 14 (Extinct)
Fiesta Bowl 01-01-83 Arizona State 32 Oklahoma 21
Orange Bowl 01-01-85 Washington 28 Oklahoma 17
Orange Bowl 01-01-86 Oklahoma 25 Penn State 10
Orange Bowl 01-01-87 Oklahoma 42 Arkansas 8
Orange Bowl 01-01-88 Miami (FL) 20 Oklahoma 14
Citrus Bowl 01-02-89 Clemson 13 Oklahoma 6
Gator Bowl 12-29-91 Oklahoma 48 Virginia 14
Oklahoma State
Record: 0-1 Bluegrass Bowl 0-1
Conferences: ACC 1-0
Bluegrass Bowl 12-13-58 Oklahoma St. 15 Florida St. 6 (Extinct)
Bowl Records:
Bowls Record
Orange 40 20-20 Sugar 11 8-3
Bluebonnet 9 5-4 Fiesta 8 1-7
Gator 7 3-4 Liberty 7 3-4
Sun 6 4-2 Cotton 5 1-4
All American 3 1-2 Freedom 2 0-2
Blockbuster 1 0-1 Bluegrass 1 0-1
Citrus 3 1-2 Gotham 1 1-0
Holiday 1 0-1 Independence 1 0-1
LA Xmas Fest 1 0-1 Peach 1 0-1
Rose 1 0-1 Aloha 1 1-0
Bowls by Conferences including teams and years against each:
ACC 12-15 Record Years
Clemson 1-3 1949, 1957, 1982, 1989
Duke 1-1 1955, 1958
Florida State 3-4 1958, 1965, 1980, 1981, 1988, 1990, 1993
Georgia Tech 1-4 1940, 1948, 1962, 1972, 1991
Maryland 2-1 1950, 1954, 1956
North Carolina 1-0 1949
North Carolina St 1-2 1947, 1973, 1977
South Carolina 1-0 1979
Virginia 1-0 1991
Big East 0-2 Record Years
Syracuse 0-1 1993
Miami 0-1 1992
Big 8 1-1 Record Years
Nebraska 1-0 1979
Oklahoma 0-1 1979
Big 10 2-2 Record Years
Michigan 1-1 1976, 1986
Ohio State 1-0 1977
Purdue 0-1 1980
Independent 10-6 Record Years
Miami, Fl. 2-3 1962, 1967, 1984, 1988, 1989
Navy 1-0 1961
Notre Dame 2-1 1973, 1990, 1991
Penn State 2-2 1969, 1970, 1972, 1986
Pitt 1-0 1975
Southern Miss 1-0 1981
Syracuse 1-0 1959
Pac 10 0-7 Record Years
Arizona State 0-3 1972, 1975, 1983
Southern Cal 0-1 1924
Stanford 0-1 1941
Washington 0-2 1985 (2x)
SEC 16-12 Record Years
Alabama 3-5 1963, 1966,1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1991
Auburn 1-3 1964, 1972(2x), 1973
Florida 2-0 1966, 1974
Georgia 1-1 1960, 1969
Louisiana State 6-1 1950, 1962, 1971, 1978, 1983, 1985, 1987
Mississippi St 1-1 1980, 1981
Tennessee 1-1 1939, 1968
Tulane 1-0 1970
SWC 6-9 Record Years
Arkansas 1-2 1965, 1978, 1987
Baylor 0-1 1986
Houston 2-1 1971, 1980, 1981
Rice 1-1 1938, 1961
Southern Methodist 0-1 1968
Texas 2-2 1946, 1974, 1975, 1976
Texas A & M 0-1 1978
WAC 2-2 Record Years
Brigham Young 1-2 1983, 1988
Wyoming 1-0 1976
Unknown 0-1 Record Years
Fordham 0-1 1942
Big 8 Bowl
Oklahoma 1979 Orange Bowl
Nebraska 1979 Orange Bowl
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA04839; Tue, 5 Jan 93 18:07:20 -0800
% Received: from helios.unl.edu by hoss.unl.edu; Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:10:15 -0600
% Received: from tssi.com by helios (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA04540; Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:06:54 CS
% Received: by tssi.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.14) id <[email protected]>; Tue, 5 Jan 93 19:54 CS
% Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:22:51 EST
% From: [email protected] (Dave Niebuhr)
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% To: [email protected]
% Subject: Big 8 Bowl Trivia
% Precedence: bulk
|
18.850 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 06 1993 15:03 | 9 |
| They keep listing the Sun Bowl as 'extinct', but all it did was change
names to the John Hancock Bowl.
Oklahoma State has played in more than one bowl - they whipped Wyoming
in the Holiday bowl 5 or 6 years ago, and they probably played in some
others in the early-mid 80's.
Joe
|
18.851 | re: Big-8 Bowl Record Post | MOSPRT::M_HENDERSON | Warren Report = Fiction | Thu Jan 07 1993 10:45 | 1 |
| Yea the guy that comiled this stuff said there might be some inconsistencies.
|