| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 3.1 | Hopefully ESPN will still have a bunch | AGNT99::MACNEAL | Papa Mac | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:52 | 2 | 
|  |     The new home for TV baseball, CBS, will be televising a whopping 16
    regular season games in 1991.
 | 
| 3.2 |  | CAM::WAY | Let's Dance to the Masochism Tango | Mon Jan 07 1991 14:13 | 14 | 
|  | �    The new home for TV baseball, CBS, will be televising a whopping 16
�    regular season games in 1991.
Thank God!  Now maybe they'll have some decent programming on 8^)
I like baseball, but it seemed that over the summer wherever I turned
the channel there was baseball.  CBS, ABC, ESPN, TNT, WTXX-20 (mets),
Channel 26 in New London (Yankees)...  
Could it be CBS lost money on baseball?
'saw
 | 
| 3.3 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | Papa Mac | Mon Jan 07 1991 14:58 | 5 | 
|  | �Could it be CBS lost money on baseball?
    
    Absolutely.  I believe they are trying to get some of their money back. 
    That doesn't have anything to do with the number of games scheduled
    though.  I think 16 games is an increase over last year's coverage.
 | 
| 3.4 |  | CAM::WAY | Let's Dance to the Masochism Tango | Mon Jan 07 1991 15:43 | 9 | 
|  | �I think 16 games is an increase over last year's coverage.
Oh, I didn't realize that.
It seemed every time I turned on CBS this summer they had baseball
on.
'Saw
 | 
| 3.5 | Future star or someone on his way out? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Spiderman is having me for dinner | Fri Jan 11 1991 13:57 | 6 | 
|  |     Today's paper says that the Pirates agreed to a one-year, $450,000
    contract with free-agent infielder Curtis Wilkerson.
    
    Um...who's that?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.6 | Utility player...been around...Texas recently...parade in... | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The elbow is part of the ball | Fri Jan 11 1991 14:01 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.7 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Do the Bartman! | Fri Jan 11 1991 14:12 | 5 | 
|  |     Wilkerson also spent a couple years with the Cubs...generic mediocre
    utility type player...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.8 | OK all you Friday pundits | CNTROL::MACNEAL | Papa Mac | Fri Jan 11 1991 16:49 | 5 | 
|  |     OK Y'all,
    
    Get thee to a punnery.  
    
    Go directly to note 69.  Do not pass Go.  Do not collect $200.
 | 
| 3.9 | A new patch for the AIDS quilt ... :-( | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Thu Jan 17 1991 14:07 | 25 | 
|  |     I'm really suprised that this didn't get a play in this note.
    
    Former San Diego Padre 2B/CF Alan Wiggins, died earlier this week of
    AIDS-related complications. He was 32.
    
    In 1984, Wiggins was the catalyst behind the Padres drive to the
    National League pennant, as he stole 70 bases and scored 106 runs.
    However, the next season, drug problems caused him to be suspended,
    then dropped from the Pads. (San Diego never recovered from his loss in
    the lineup.) He was picked up by Baltimore, but he had a relaspe and
    ended up out of baseball.
    
    By the time of his death, he had melted down to 75 lbs. He is survived
    by a wife and three children. 
    
    What is really sad is that for all of the friends that he was supposed
    to have had in the game, only Steve Garvey represented the Pads at his
    funeral (a man with whom Wiggins supposedly didn't get along with). Lee
    Lacy represented the O's.
    
    I assume that his contraction of AIDS was realted to his drug use.
    
    RIP alan.
    
    Doc
 | 
| 3.10 | too bad | PNO::HEISER | news: 71 shopping days til no PNO | Thu Jan 17 1991 14:12 | 4 | 
|  |     Yeah I had heard this too!  He had a great post season performance in
    '84!
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.11 |  | REFINE::ASHE | All we are saying... | Thu Jan 17 1991 17:20 | 3 | 
|  |     Too bad it wasn't good enough... (ha ha)
    
    I heard rumors it was AIDS related, but didn't hear confirmation.
 | 
| 3.12 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Thu Jan 17 1991 23:54 | 3 | 
|  |     Yeah, when I read that he died of pnemonia, and some other aliments, I
    immeaditely thought AIDS, esp. in light of his past drug use. I'm sorry
    that I was right ... :-(
 | 
| 3.13 | Sigh yung lad makes good! | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Feb 15 1991 11:14 | 8 | 
|  | Doug Drabek went to arbitration.
result= $3,335,000.00
per year
maybe I'll tell my kid he can quit school and just throw a baseball six
hours a day.
Mike JN
 | 
| 3.14 | How do you go to arbitration at DEC? ;^) | CAM::WAY | The Axe-master | Fri Feb 15 1991 11:20 | 6 | 
|  | Hey, for that kind of $$$$, maybe I'll go to arbitration.
I can't pitch worth a darn, but he, maybe I can pick up over 100K,
which is far more than I make here...
'Saw
 | 
| 3.15 |  | COOKIE::WAHL |  | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:24 | 2 | 
|  |     Here, if you go to arbitration, they encourage you to become a free
    agent ...
 | 
| 3.16 |  | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Feb 15 1991 17:34 | 24 | 
|  | The following players are the 29 remaining free agents:
AMERICAN LEAGUE 
--------------- 
Baltimore Orioles (2) -- Ron Kittle, Joe Price
Boston Red Sox (1) -- Danny Heep
California Angels (2) -- Brian Downing, Greg Minton
Cleveland Indians (3) -- Tom Brookens, Candy Maldonado, Ken Phelps
Detroit Tigers (3) -- Darnell Coles, Larry Sheets, Gary Ward
Kansas City Royals (2) -- Steve Jeltz, Frank White
Milwaukee Brewers (1) -- Paul Mirabella
Oakland Athletics (2) -- Ron Hassey, Willie Randolph
Toronto Blue Jays (1) -- John Candelaria
NATIONAL LEAGUE
---------------- 
Cincinnati Reds (2) -- Rick Mahler, Ron Oester
Los Angeles Dodgers (1) -- Rick Dempsey
Montreal Expos (1) -- Dave Schmidt
Pittsburgh Pirates (2) -- Doug Bair, Jerry Reuss
St. Louis Cardinals (3) -- Tom Niedenfuer, John Tudor, Denny Walling
San Diego Padres (1) -- Fred Lynn
San Francisco Giants (2) -- Gary Carter, Mark Thurmond.
 | 
| 3.17 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | The Celtics are for real | Mon Feb 18 1991 09:18 | 12 | 
|  |     re .16:
    
    Several of the players listed have received invitations to spring
    training as non-roster players: Larry Sheets with the O's, Ron Hassey
    with Montreal, Rick Dempsey with the Brewers, and Gary Carter with the
    Dodgers.  I think Candelaria also got an invite to the Dodgers camp,
    but I'm not positive.  
    
    I'm shocked that Candy Maldonado still remains available...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.18 |  | CSC32::W_TUTTLE |  | Mon Feb 25 1991 14:07 | 7 | 
|  |     The Braves signed Dave Justice to a one-year contract. Does anyone know
    for how much? Why didn't the Braves sign him to a multi-year contract?
    Is it because he needs to prove himself this year  or cause he can't 
    be a free agent for 3 years?
    
    Thanks,
    The Thrill
 | 
| 3.19 |  | CSC32::W_TUTTLE |  | Mon Feb 25 1991 14:17 | 4 | 
|  |     Right-hander Dwight Gooden does an about-face, deciding his agent may 
    reopen contract negotiations with the New York Mets.
    
    Will The Thrill
 | 
| 3.20 | Denver gets their at-bat today | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:30 | 8 | 
|  |     NL expansion committee will visit Denver today, the last of their
    visits to prospective expansion cities.  During their visit, they will
    tour the location of a new ballpark and Mile High Stadium, which is
    where an expansion team would play its first 2 seasons while the new
    park is being built.  A decision on the 2 expansion cities could come
    as early as mid-June.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.21 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Mar 26 1991 13:33 | 7 | 
|  |     re .20:
    
    I can imagine the "altitude effects" ratholes that would take place in
    this conference if Denver got a MLB team...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.22 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Mar 26 1991 15:29 | 18 | 
|  |     Take it to the bank...
    
    Buffalo is a shoe in for 1 franchise.
    
    Washington has a toe up on Denver for the second.
    
    As for the Florida entries; can you imagine playing baseball in July in
    Joe Robbie Stadium? 
    
    Orlando is for Mickey and Goofey - not baseball - besides, it's too
    hot.
    
    Tampa-St Pete has the best shot since they have a dome but that is
    precisely WHY I would not like to see a team go there. Baseball is for
    outdoors on real grass.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.23 | You think Buffalo will get a franchise ? | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:14 | 14 | 
|  | >    Buffalo is a shoe in for 1 franchise.
    
    I'm curious why YOU think so.  I know why Buffalo SHOULD get it, but
    being from Buffalo, I have a strong feeling they won't.  It's just a 
    law of nature.  Buffalo is not a sexy town.  Sure they have a new
    stadium that is absolutely beautiful (I've been at a Buffalo Bison's
    game), they broke minor league records for attendance, they are a 
    sports town in the sense that NYC, Boston and Chicago are, etc...
    BUT NOOOOOO... (ahem, let me stop here)
    
    So why do you think so.
    
    -Paul 
    (Buffalonian in CT)
 | 
| 3.24 |  | CAM::WAY | Props have great shoulders to lean on | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:18 | 11 | 
|  | >    -Paul 
>    (Buffalonian in CT)
Let me correct that for you:
	-Paul
	(Baloney-an in CT)
HTH,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.25 | Florida hot market... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 26 1991 16:20 | 7 | 
|  |                                                
    Everything I've read has said that Florida has one franchise locked up,
    with an outside chance of taking both.  The AL has complained that the
    second Florida franchise should be left to them for a later expansion.
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.26 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Mar 26 1991 18:25 | 7 | 
|  |     I've heard and would agree that Florida has 1 franchise locked up. 
    Buffalo's biggest problems are that it only has a population of about
    1.2 million in its metropolitan area, plus Toronto and Cleveland are
    both only about 3 hours away.  I would be very suprised if Buffalo got
    one of the teams.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.27 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:10 | 20 | 
|  |     re .23
    
    Paul, I feel Buffalo is a lock because it has demonstrated such a
    strong support for baseball. 
    
    Attendance in Florida in the summer is a risk. Washington has failed on
    two occasions. Seattle has proven to be a disappointment as has
    Atlanta.
    
    Baseball wants to be assured that the cities chosen will support the
    franchise and I believe Buffalo has shown this better than any
    prospective city.
    
    As far as nthe proximity to Cleveland and Tornonto, I don't see this as
    a problem because we're talking National League. As far as 1.2 million
    in the metro area, how many are in the St Louis area? Or Kansas City?
    Both franchises draw quite well.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.28 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC - AnotherExcellentLossPending | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:18 | 8 | 
|  |     	Buffalo will support the team Rich, but the potential for cable
    revenue and pay per view revenue is greater in Miami or any other
    Florida city.  The Buffalo could very well support this team with
    sellout crowds, but if the television revenue isn't there the team
    will operae at a financial loss.  The live gate cannot finance a
    team's expenses.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.29 | Buffalo's chances slim... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:49 | 23 | 
|  |     
    The Slasher's got it right-- Buffalo is *not* a lock.  They're
    officially still in the hunt, but one of the expansion committee 
    members even went so far as to make the rather damning statement 
    on the official visit the other day of "It'd be nice if you had 
    another million people".
    
    Washington very definitely could support a franchise.  Previous
    evidence that they can't is misleading, given the growth of the area
    and construction of one of the best public transportation systems in
    the country since the last move.  Between Cal Griffith and Bob Short, 
    DC was saddled with two of the most cheap-assed, short-sighted owners 
    in the history of baseball, too.  I'll go on record as saying that 
    the franchise that eventually ends up in DC will be better off 
    financially than either of the previous two that fled for Minnesota 
    and Texas is right now. 
    
    For my own personal, selfish reasons, I'd like to see the two
    franchises end up in Buffalo and Washington.  Realistically, though,
    it's going to be Florida and probably either Denver or Washington.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.30 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:27 | 19 | 
|  |     Good point, Don. However, is Buffalo any less attractive than Milwaukee
    or Seattle for TV? Or Montreal, for that matter?
    
    I think a local TV station up there could do pretty well with them.If
    they created a network that included much of northen New York that
    included Syracuse, Utica and Rochester, your talking some huge
    potential there.
    
    As far as DC. If they are planning on playing at RFK, you are correct
    in that it is on a stop for the Metro. But, sad to say, most games at
    home will be night games and that area of DC is STILL not an attractive
    geographic place to be at night. It's a 1/2 hour away from Baltimore
    and, to get there from northern Virginia is a traffic nightmare. But,
    if they could pull in 15K-20K a game, they would do well with local TV
    and radio contracts. I still don't think ole Faye wants to see empty
    seats.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.31 | St. Pete and DC | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Wed Mar 27 1991 09:44 | 8 | 
|  |     What I think this committee will find attractive about St. Petersberg
    and DC is that they both have facilities and could start play tomorrow.
    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
    one. 
    
    Or do they already have an expansion year set?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.32 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:07 | 21 | 
|  | >    What I think this committee will find attractive about St. Petersberg
>    and DC is that they both have facilities and could start play tomorrow.
>    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
>    one. 
    
    The problem with DC is that they would be sharing a stadium with the
    Redskins, and the NL has said they prefer a baseball-only stadium. 
    This could hurt DC.  I don't think they have any plans to build a new
    baseball stadium in DC.  Denver could also start play tomorrow.  The
    plan right now is they would play 2 years in Mile High, and then move
    into the new stadium.  The stadium has already been approved by voters
    and will be built if Denver is awarded a team.  Mile High would need
    some minor changes to accomodate Major League baseball for a couple
    years, but that is no big deal.
    
>    Or do they already have an expansion year set?
    
    The 2 expansion teams will start playing in the 1993 season.
    
    Joe                  
 
 | 
| 3.33 | More on Buffalo | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:21 | 19 | 
|  | >    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
>    one. 
    
    The Buffalo Bisons (Pirates AAA team) currently play in a brand new 
    stadium (Pilot's field).  It's ready to go.  Additional seating can be 
    added between seasons (it was designed to do so).  So in Buffalo's case, 
    I don't think that's an issue.
    
    As for Buffalo's population supporting the team enough through TV
    revenue (I agree that the bucks to be made are in TV not at the gate),
    just look at the Bills.  They are keeping some very expensive players
    on their roster and are doing quite well.  They have the support of the
    fans and because they fill Rich stadium all the other (and I mean
    pretty darn near ALL the other) 1.2 million will watch the game on the
    tube. Also, Rochester is only 70 miles from Buffalo and Syracuse is
    only 120 miles.  Currently, these cities plus Buffalo are Yankee
    territory, but if a National League team was brought in it would be
    supported.
    
 | 
| 3.34 | Who plays in Mile High now? | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:23 | 7 | 
|  |     That reminds me of something I've been wanting to know for the past few
    years, Joe.  What type of baseball are they using Mile High for now? 
    Minor league?  I ask because at the beginning of every NFL season, Mile
    High is showing a baseball field as well.  That's an awfully big
    stadium for minor league ball.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.35 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:38 | 6 | 
|  |     re .34:
    
    The Denver Zephyrs (Brewers' AAA team) currently play in Mile High.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.36 | A little bit of history on Mile High | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Mar 27 1991 11:09 | 14 | 
|  |     Mile High Stadium was originally built for baseball and was originally
    named Bears Stadium.  The east stands (the ones you see on TV, across
    from the cameras) weren't there originally, and they just set up
    temporary bleachers for football season.  As the Broncos became more
    popular, the movable east stands, were installed.  The last phase of
    expansion took place just before the '77 season (just in time for the
    Broncos' 1st Super Bowl season) and involved the 3rd deck being added
    around the whole stadium, except for the open end, of course.  So
    that's why a AAA team is playing in such a big stadium: it wasn't
    originally very big and was built for baseball.  Also, they added some
    luxury skyboxes along the top of the west side of the stadium a few
    years ago.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.37 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC - AnotherExcellentLossPending | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:30 | 16 | 
|  |     	Rich those small market teams you mention are having trouble
    surviving financially and true the Buffalo football team is making
    money, but other than the few stars there are no long term guaranteed
    contracts and with the NFL players union being so weak it'll be
    some time before the salaries will escalate like they have in baseball.
    
    	The way for the league's smaller market teams to survive is
    for the Yankees and the large market teams to share their local
    cable revenues.  It will not happen until the league almost fails,
    but it will have to happen or the Seattles Pittsburghs etc. will
    only serve as minor league franchises to the big markets.  I'm not
    saying this guarantees winning championships for the rich teams,
    but it will guarantee their making money, while the smaller franchises
    fail.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.38 | Everyone supports a winner | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Mar 27 1991 12:46 | 6 | 
|  |     Buffalo is drawing great now, but don't forget they just won the AFC
    title and have won 3 straight AFC East titles.  How were they doing
    before Jim Kelly came to town?  If I remember right, they were one of
    the league's poorer-drawing teams at the time.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.39 | Naw!!  The Bills always draw pretty good | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:19 | 13 | 
|  |     RE: Buffalo Bills
    
   >If I remember right, they were one of the league's poorer-drawing teams at 
    the time.  
    
    Negatory!  When they were winning 2-4 games per season, granted they
    weren't selling out, but they would draw a pretty good size crowd
    (better than most any other city that has a 2-14 team).  Face it,
    Buffalo is a blue collar town that will look for any good excuse to
    swill beer.  Buffalo is comparable (people-wise) to Cleveland or
    Chicago (just smaller).  Weren't the Browns still packing them in after
    this miserable season?
    
 | 
| 3.40 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:22 | 7 | 
|  |     re the last couple:
    
    Also, the Pirates' AAA team in Buffalo drew over one million fans in
    1988 despite finishing 13(?) games out of first.
    
    
     py
 | 
| 3.41 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Oh No, I've said too much... | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:31 | 23 | 
|  | 
The reasons the mariners don't get any support in Seattle are many.
1) The team has sucked for most of it's existance. They've never had a .500 
    season in 14 years of existance.
2) Owners with financial difficulty. Now the Latest owner Smulyan is supposedly
    in difficulty with his radio empire.
3) They play in a stinking dome. When you have 7 months of crappy weather, 2  
    months of so-so weather punctuated by 3 months of good weather would you
    want to spend any of the time of good weather sitting inside a concrete
    structure watching a B-bal team play? The local minor league clubs that play
    outdoors draw decent crowds.
Luckily the emergence of Griffey Jr. could turn around the fortunes of the 
mariners.....It's all wait and see right now....
BTW - the M's bring in a total of $25 million/year in all local broadcast rights
       to their games. The Yankees have a $100 million cable deal alone.....
Metz
 | 
| 3.42 | Are economic franchise moves necessarily bad? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Mar 27 1991 13:35 | 19 | 
|  |                 
    It may be complete misperception, but I see both Denver and Buffalo as
    great football towns, regardless of their teams' records.  I don't 
    know if they'd do as well with baseball, though, but Buffalo has 
    proved some level of support in the recent past if not throughout 
    their minor league history.  I'm more skeptical of Denver.
    
    Rather than continuous expansion, maybe it's not a bad idea to
    circulate some of the weaker franchises after a certain period of 
    proven non-performance and non-support from both local ownership 
    and/or the fans.  Again from my personal vantage point and with no 
    offense to anyone from these cities, I'd say Montreal and Seattle 
    are ripe for moves to greener pastures, with teams like Houston and 
    Cleveland trailing close behind.  I'd include Atlanta, too, but 
    those poor people have never really been given a chance, and perhaps
    have suffered enough.
    
    glenn
        
 | 
| 3.43 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | we were never being boring | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:04 | 9 | 
|  |     I remember several years ago a shot of two lone fans at a Bills' game
    doing their own private, two-man wave.  One would stand up, then sit
    down while the other one stood up, then sat down, while the other...
    One of the funniest "fan things" I've ever seen.
    
    No one else was in sight.  That would indicate that they weren't
    drawing very well.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.44 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC - AnotherExcellentLossPending | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:23 | 8 | 
|  |     	Metz, you sure about the 25 million figure?  Sounds high.  But
    the point I am making is if Seattle can't afford to pay Griffey
    around 7-9 million (don't laugh) when he becomes eligible for free
    agency down the road they are doomed to this cycle of getting young
    players, developing them, watching them become stars and then losing
    them.  And the league is worse off for it.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.45 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Kenya Roools again | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:48 | 3 | 
|  |     I thought the figure was closer to 3 million for the Mariners.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.46 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Oh No, I've said too much... | Wed Mar 27 1991 15:27 | 19 | 
|  | 
Last I heard was that the 25 million was from all tv and radio rights for a 
season. The yankess are pulling in 100 Mill in cable alone (like sportschannel),
not counting radio, local broadcast (ala 38 for the Sox) and other cable (PIX).
However I could be mistaken. I don't have the article any more. If somebody is
positive it's another number then I'll go with it.
I agree with Don that if the M's can't afford to fork over the big bucks when
Junior comes up for his next contract then they are doomed to be a minor league
franchise to the other more lucrative clubs. Also what few fans they have 
here will desert them if they don't sign .Jr and they should probably move to
another city.
Seattle is and always will be primarily a football city. It's probably close
to PitsburgH in many respects.
Metz
 | 
| 3.47 | Opposite ends of the spectrum are rapidly moving apart... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Mar 27 1991 16:08 | 29 | 
|  |     
> Last I heard was that the 25 million was from all tv and radio rights for a 
> season. The yankess are pulling in 100 Mill in cable alone (like sportschannel),
> not counting radio, local broadcast (ala 38 for the Sox) and other cable (PIX).
    The Mariners are taking in about $10 million from CBS and $4 million
    from ESPN like everyone else.  That'd make $11 million from other
    sources, which sounds high but maybe the local outlets are getting
    taken to the cleaners, who knows.  By comparison, from today's Globe 
    the Brewers are taking in only $5 million from local sources, and I 
    thought that Seattle was in that ballpark.  The Red Sox take in $20 
    million from local TV, cable, and radio; the Yankees $50 million from
    MSG cable alone.
    
    I'd like to see MLB move towards dividing up the TV/radio money, but
    leave gate receipts (which seem to be more equitable, and more 
    a function of team performance) alone in order to maintain some 
    competition between clubs.  For those that think this is unfair to 
    teams like the Yankees, Dodgers, and Red Sox and more than a bit 
    socialistic, consider that baseball does hold an antitrust exemption 
    which legally prevents further expansion into markets like New York 
    and Boston, and protects any dilution of broadcast revenues for the
    owners of those ballclubs.  I for one would love to see National 
    League baseball in Boston, for instance, and would gladly pay money 
    to do so.  With the help of the government, MLB has made that an
    impossibility, though.
    
    glenn                     
    
 | 
| 3.48 | Much bigger population needed for baseball | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Mar 27 1991 16:31 | 14 | 
|  |  If Seattle really wants a $100,000,000 broadcast TV deal, it should add
 about 6 or 7 million people to its population base first.   There is a
 reason why some things seem just a little bigger in New York City.
 
 Also, there is virtually *NO* comparison that can or should be made
 between a city's football fans and its baseball fans.   The Buffalo Bills
 draw well because they have a good team and also because they only play 8
 regular season games plus pre-season and playoff games there every year.  
 
 Baseball teams play 81 games a year at home.   It's very easy to fill the
 stands for the annual Bills-Dolphins game.  It'll be very hard to get the
 same 30,000 plus to come out every single night for baseball.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.49 | Border Line major league cities | COGITO::HILL |  | Wed Mar 27 1991 17:11 | 40 | 
|  |     re .42
    
    The idea of rotating border-line major league franchises is an
    intriguing one. One of the problems is that once a city loses a team
    (often not by fan support--Brooklyn) it is next to impossible for them 
    to get one back. 
    
    In European pro soccer, teams that finish last (usually the bottom 2 of
    a 16 to 18 team league, depending on the country) drop to the 2nd
    division (Triple A) and are replaced by the top 2 teams. So if a team
    hits the skids for a while, they can rebuild, then get themselves back
    in the big leagues IF they deserve it. 
    
    If baseball were to keep the 12 team leagues (keep the NL style
    schedule) and relegate a team every year, cities like Louisville, 
    Buffalo, Denver, Washington, etc. could have their chance, but if 
    they didn't survive, they just go back to being a triple A team.
    This way teams like the Indians and Braves would have to show a
    comittmet to at least TRY to be competitive. Geez, the Tribe hasn't
    been in a pennant race since the Eisenhower administration.
    
    Louisville is a case in point. A few years ago Jim Bunning was lobbying
    for expansion for Louisville (he's now a Kentucky senator), pointing to
    the good crowds they were getting. The thing was (is?) at that time the
    Reds were really stinking the joint out, and weren't drawing too well.
    Obviously, fans from Kentucky watched the Redbirds instead of the Reds
    if they were to go to a game. I wonder what kind of crowds Louisville
    draws NOW?
       
    The problem would be that the Louisville or Buffalo teams that could be
    border line ML cities would be stocked with farmhands belonging to
    major league teams. In soccer, the smaller teams are independent, and
    instead of Joe Prospect being called up to the bigs, Smallville United
    F.C. sells the Kid to Liverpool for 100,000 to 250,000 pounds, that is 
    used for operating expenses, or perhaps to buy players from teams even 
    lower on the food-chain. It probably works out the same in terms of how 
    much to the big boys spend on player development, but the small clubs CAN 
    make a run at the big time. 
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.50 | On Louisville | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Wed Mar 27 1991 17:19 | 20 | 
|  |     >Louisville is a case in point. A few years ago Jim Bunning was lobbying
    >for expansion for Louisville (he's now a Kentucky senator), pointing to
    >the good crowds they were getting. The thing was (is?) at that time the
    >Reds were really stinking the joint out, and weren't drawing too well.
    >Obviously, fans from Kentucky watched the Redbirds instead of the Reds
    >if they were to go to a game. I wonder what kind of crowds Louisville
    >draws NOW?
    
    The Louisville Cardinals still draw extremely well.  They are a case
    study in *excellently* run businesses.  I saw a recent documentary
    which brought them up and showed how they have created an atmosphere
    for quality family entertainment, run by conscientious individuals and
    are patronized by customers who appreciate the product they offer which
    is far more than baseball.
    
    They don't deserve your skepticism, but it also doesn't necessarily
    mean that the city deserves a major league team.  It's the way the
    franchise operates which is unique.
    
    Dan
 | 
| 3.51 | Too close for comfort | COGITO::HILL |  | Thu Mar 28 1991 13:20 | 10 | 
|  |     OK, maybe so, but the point was that they drew at least *SOME* fans who
    probably would go to Cincinnati to see the Reds, but at that time the
    Reds were terrible and drew small(er) crowds. There WAS talk that
    Louisville could be a major leage team, but the proximity to Cincinnati
    makes it all but impossible. 
    
    A LOT of minor league franchises are much better run (in the business
    sense) than their major league counterparts.
    
    Tom 
 | 
| 3.52 |  | ECAMV3::JACOB | How It Got Here, I haven't a Clue | Mon Apr 01 1991 19:45 | 10 | 
|  |     Heard today that the Braves waived Andres Thomas(SS) today.
    
    The midget(oops, treading dangerous ground here) who reportedly has
    beat him out is none other than former Pirate Raphael Belliard.
    
    Belliard is a good defensive shortstop but his lifetime batting average
    is somewhere around my bowling average.  Was Thomas that bad???????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.53 | :-) | EARRTH::BROOKS | The 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLV | Wed Apr 03 1991 14:31 | 1 | 
|  |     Was your bowling average that good ?
 | 
| 3.54 |  | ECAMV3::JACOB | How It Got Here, I haven't a Clue | Wed Apr 03 1991 18:33 | 6 | 
|  |     re-.1  My best season I finished with a 184 avg(ten pins) and that's
    about where Belliard will finish this year.  Sure he's quick and good
    defensively, but the guy just can't hit the ball out of the infield.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.55 | Who would name a team the Sun Rays? | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 15 1991 10:02 | 10 | 
|  |     I saw in the paper this weekend that some of the expansion candidate
    cities have picked out names for their potential teams.  The one that
    sticks out in my mind is the Orlando Sun Rays.  Baaarrrffff!  There
    were a couple of others, but I can't remember them (Buffalo Bills might
    have been one).
    
    Interesting note was that the cities that already have names selected
    for the franchises are probably the least likely to get teams.  The
    other cities will hold contests to select names should they be awarded
    a franchise.
 | 
| 3.56 | Go Mudcats (AA, Pirates) | SHALOT::MEDVID | when our worlds they fall apart | Wed May 15 1991 10:23 | 12 | 
|  |     The Sun Rays is the name of Orlando's minor league team (AA, Twins).  I
    don't think that's such a bad name and their emblem, if I remember
    correctly, is quite stylish with this golden searay.
    
    There is also a team in Orlando's division named the Carolina Mudcats
    that has an emblem of this big catfish in a C.
    
    Bob Hunt and I went to the Charlotte Knights vs Memphis Chicks game
    last night.  Memphis has an indian chiefs head for an emblem.  Couldn't
    really understand that.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.57 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 15 1991 10:29 | 5 | 
|  | �    Bob Hunt and I went to the Charlotte Knights vs Memphis Chicks game
�    last night.  Memphis has an indian chiefs head for an emblem.  Couldn't
�    really understand that.
    
    Isn't there an Indian tribe called the Chickasaws?
 | 
| 3.58 |  | CAM::WAY | Jose, did you diddle Madonna? | Wed May 15 1991 10:38 | 11 | 
|  | Teams these days pick such wimpy names!
How bout the Orlando Diamondbacks (they have diamond back rattler's in 
Florida, right?)
I mean, get something MANLY.
Sheesh, with a name like the Sun Rays, you'll have guys named Blaine
and Antoine playing for you!
'Saw
 | 
| 3.59 | conjurs images of anita bryant with an orange!!! | SHIRE::ELLIS | middle for diddle | Thu May 16 1991 04:38 | 1 | 
|  | 
 | 
| 3.60 | Zimmer is gonzo | CELTIK::JACOB | Would YOU go hunting with Ted Nugent? | Tue May 21 1991 22:11 | 9 | 
|  |     Don Zimmer became the second manager in the National League to get the
    axe this season.  The first manager axed was Nick Leyva of the
    Phillies.
    
    Personally, I think that the Cub owners are acting irrationally.
    
    JaKe
    
    
 | 
| 3.61 | I'll miss his puffy little chipmunk cheeks | SHALOT::MEDVID | when our worlds they fall apart | Wed May 22 1991 08:53 | 6 | 
|  |     The Cubs are only one game under .500 and it's only May.  Do they
    really think Zimmer was the problem?  Stupid.
    
    I hope he turns up somewhere soon.  He's second only to Billy Ball.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.62 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Impriso..er..Married 9 years today | Wed May 22 1991 15:50 | 8 | 
|  |     I agree Dan'l, the Cubs players are where their problem lies right
    now.Most of the Multi-million $$$ free agents they went out and bought
    during the off-season are hitting somewhere around their weight.  What
    they should be hitting is somewhere around Zimmer's weight.  Then the
    club would have been in 1st place by 9 games.
    
    Jake
    
 | 
| 3.63 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Impriso..er..Married 9 years today | Wed May 22 1991 21:49 | 6 | 
|  |     Don't know the guys name, but the Cubs hired a new manager today.  He
    was the manager of their AAA club in, I think,, Omaha, ending Joe
    Altobelli's one day stint as manager.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.64 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu May 23 1991 08:17 | 10 | 
|  | 	Don Zimmer is an ironhead gerbil.  Remember two years ago when 
everybody in this notesfile was gaga over the Cubs?  Remember who said the 
Zimmer factor would be instrumental in a San Francisco victory in the NLCS?
If Zip gets another job I hope the team he goes to has a rubberarmed 
reliever (Soup Campbell) and no player whose lifestyle is contrary to what 
blubberhead believes it should be, or said player will spend a lot of time on 
the bench (Bernie Carbo and Bill Lee).  How the guy keeps getting a job is 
a tribute to baseball's "good ole boy" syndrome.
				/Don
 | 
| 3.65 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu May 23 1991 09:07 | 11 | 
|  |     re .63, the new cubs manager is Jim Essian; he had been manager of the
    Cubs' triple-A Iowa team.
      
    Frankly, I don't see why so many people picked the Cubs to win the NL
    East.  Going into this season they reminded me of the pre-Clemens Red
    Sox, great offense but not enough pitching....the Pirates have
    comparable offense and *much* deeper starting pitching (even had D.
    Jackson and Harkey stayed healthy).
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.66 | Another No-Hitter... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Be Excellent to Each Other | Thu May 23 1991 16:41 | 4 | 
|  |     It was reported in another conference, byu ex Sports-noter Spud, that
    Tommy Greene of the Phillies has pitched a no-hitter...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.67 |  | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | I'm digging for fire | Fri May 24 1991 08:49 | 4 | 
|  |     Apparently Greene walked 7 and whiffed 10.  Must have been an
    adventure.
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.68 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri May 24 1991 16:00 | 13 | 
|  |     The organizing committee for bringing baseball to Denver has decided on
    purple as one of the prospective team's colors. Reasons: No other Major
    League teams have purple as a color, and the correlation to the purple
    majestic Rocky Mountains.  They say there's little chance the team will 
    be called the Bears (Good!!), mainly because when someone says Bears, 
    most people think of the Chicago Bears.  Possible names being tossed 
    around are Rockies, Cougars, and Grizzlies.  No mention of whether the 
    team would be called Denver or Colorado, but my guess is it would be 
    Denver.  From what I hear, they want to have a team name, colors, logo,
    and uniforms ready for the announcement of the 2 expansion cities on 
    June 12th.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.69 |  | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Living the life of a pinball | Fri May 24 1991 16:41 | 8 | 
|  |     
    "The Colorado Purple Majestic Mountain Grizzlies" is a fine name.  They
    could call 'em just "The Rockies" for short, and their theme song could
    be "Gonna Fly (out) Now" sung by John Cougar.  But please, don't mix
    any orange with the purple.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.70 |  | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Tue May 28 1991 11:36 | 6 | 
|  |     Joe, I heard that it's going to be Colorado ....., instead of Denver
    ....., because they want more of a regional appeal.  I agree with that
    because when they were promoting the club to MLB, they said that it
    would draw from all of the Rocky Mountain Region, not just Denver.
    
    Glenn
 | 
| 3.71 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Flunk me? Flunk HIM! | Tue May 28 1991 11:38 | 2 | 
|  |     I know I'll be going when the Dodgers are in town!  8^)
    
 | 
| 3.72 | Colorado Rockies | OURGNG::RIGGEN | I need some sensible shoes | Tue May 28 1991 14:43 | 4 | 
|  | It's been heavily rumored that the "Mythical" team is gonna be called the 
Colorado Rockies. They will have a BEAR as a mascot. 
Jeff
 | 
| 3.73 |  | FDCV06::KING | Jesse's Jets! | Tue May 28 1991 14:50 | 4 | 
|  |     The Hockey team sucked big time, what would they name their baseball
    team after those losers???
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.74 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 28 1991 14:51 | 3 | 
|  |     Another team name rumor floating about is that the next club in
    Washington, D.C. will be known as the Nationals rather than the
    Senators.
 | 
| 3.75 | looking like a long summer | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles/Patriots/why me? | Tue May 28 1991 14:57 | 7 | 
|  |     re .74:
    
    Never mind major league baseball in DC.  Bring it back to Baltimore
    first.  :-(
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.76 | I like the "Bears" | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue May 28 1991 15:56 | 18 | 
|  |                  
    > Another team name rumor floating about is that the next club in
    > Washington, D.C. will be known as the Nationals rather than the
    > Senators.
    
    I don't think that's a rumor; I think the committee in Washington
    announced officially that the name would be the "Nationals".  Won't
    make much difference, though, as due to questions over the lack of  
    local deep-pockets ownership Washington appears to be all but out of 
    the running.
    
    I think Denver's a lock at this point.  By all rights, tradition
    dictates that the team be called the Denver Bears.  Short, simple, 
    with years of use behind it.  Colorado Rockies, Rocky Mountains, 
    Zephyrs, etc. don't cut it, in my opinion.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.77 | 'Rockies' it is | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue May 28 1991 16:15 | 8 | 
|  |     Yea, I also heard the nickname will be the Rockies, whether it's Denver
    or Colorado.  The logo probably won't be a bear, but it may be
    incorporated into the uniformor logo much in the same way the A's use the
    elephant.  Look for the logo to be something along the lines of the
    hockey team's old logo or the one used for the Final 4 last year.
    
    Joe
    
 | 
| 3.78 |  | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Tue May 28 1991 17:10 | 8 | 
|  |     
    	The majority of an opinion poll agrees with you Glen on
    	naming them the Bears.  Who gives a rat's patoot if they
    	have the same mascot as some team in another state?  Not
    	every single team in America/Canada can have a unique 
    	mascot.  The "Denver Bears" sounds good to me too.....
    
    	Claybone
 | 
| 3.79 |  | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Tue May 28 1991 17:58 | 5 | 
|  |     If memory serves (not a given!) MLB, "strongly suggested" to the
    ownership group that the team NOT be called the Bears.
    
    Glenn
    
 | 
| 3.80 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue May 28 1991 18:12 | 13 | 
|  | >    MLB, "strongly suggested" to the
>    ownership group that the team NOT be called the Bears.
   
    That's pretty much the case.  I'm just glad to hear they won't be called 
    the Bears.    
    
    As for the cities still in the running, everything I've read and heard
    has indicated the only 3 cities still in serious contention are Miami,
    Tampa/St. Pete, and Denver.  Buffalo, Washington, and Orlando are all
    but out of the race for an expansion team this time around.
    
    Joe 
        
 | 
| 3.81 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Flunk me? Flunk HIM! | Tue May 28 1991 18:19 | 7 | 
|  |     Rocky Mountain Oysters
    Denver Boulders
    Aurora Borealisises (the suburb)
    Denver Diamondbacks. 
    
    Just a few thoughts.
    
 | 
| 3.82 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed May 29 1991 11:55 | 5 | 
|  |     Nah, I like the Denver Elways. The mascot could be a baseball with the
    picture of a palomino horse in the middle.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.83 |  | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | I'm digging for fire | Wed May 29 1991 12:03 | 3 | 
|  |     The Colorado Colada-Sipping Soccer Yuppies.
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.84 |  | FMCSSE::BROWN | said the Joker to the Queen | Wed May 29 1991 12:45 | 8 | 
|  |     
    At least they will not have to play in the whimpy American League,
    those of us here in the Rockies will be able to see real teams, not
    the has been's from the American East.
    
    Cadzilla
    
    Denver SkySox?
 | 
| 3.85 | Ahhh balls!! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed May 29 1991 13:33 | 7 | 
|  | Howsabout da Denva Collies! I know Hoot and Monty, where ever they are would
preciate that name! Or better yet, the Denver Oysters.
Steve
 | 
| 3.86 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 29 1991 16:38 | 5 | 
|  | �    At least they will not have to play in the whimpy American League,
�    those of us here in the Rockies will be able to see real teams, not
�    the has been's from the American East.
    
    yah, they'll be in that mighty NL West.
 | 
| 3.87 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed May 29 1991 16:40 | 5 | 
|  |     Whoops, I forgot, how about the Denver Excitings? They could have
    "mood" uniforms that glow everytime a Bronco player farts.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.88 |  | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Wed May 29 1991 16:49 | 5 | 
|  |     
    	Hey Mac, lest we forget, the Reds from the mighty NL 
    	West won the WS lasted year.
    
    	Claybone :^)
 | 
| 3.89 | You tell'm Claybone | FMCSSE::BROWN | said the Joker to the Queen | Wed May 29 1991 16:51 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.90 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 29 1991 17:14 | 5 | 
|  |     And the 16th best team in the NHL almost walked off with the Stanley
    Cup...
    
    Didn't the Reds play <= .500 ball following the All Star break last
    year?  They certainly put things back together for 4 games though.
 | 
| 3.91 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Flunk me? Flunk HIM! | Wed May 29 1991 17:56 | 36 | 
|  |     Lesse...
    WEST 			East
    
    90 Reds win WS
    89 Giants lose WS
    88 Dodgers win WS
    				87 Cards lose WS
    				86 Mets win WS
    				85 Cards lose WS
    84 Padres lose WS
    				83 Phillies lose WS
    				82 Cards win WS
    81 Dodgers win WS
    
    3-2                         2-3
    
    West 			East
    
    90 A's lose WS
    89 A's win WS
    88 A's lose WS
    87 Twins win WS
    				86 Boston lose WS
    85 Royals win WS
    				84 Tigers win WS
    				83 Orioles win WS
    				82 Brewers lose WS
    				81 Yankees lose WS
    
    West 3-2 			2-3
    
                                   
    Seems the NL West isn't as bad as first thought. Looking at the trend
    it seems that the East was better in the first half of the decade where
    the West is better over the last 5 years. We'll have to see what 1991
    brings.
 | 
| 3.92 | :^) | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Doin' it again | Thu May 30 1991 08:38 | 4 | 
|  |     Er, Mac....I'd bet my last dollar that you'd be tickled pink if the Red
    Sox went 0-81 after the All-Star break, yet win the WS.
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.93 | Is Mac a Dean fan or what?  ;^) | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Thu May 30 1991 10:10 | 4 | 
|  |     
    	Thankeee kindly there LuFay.  Ya beat me to it.
    
    	Claybone_who's_tickled_pink_the_Reds_won_it_all
 | 
| 3.94 | What's wrong with traditional names? | COGITO::HILL |  | Fri May 31 1991 14:11 | 19 | 
|  |     re: a few back
    
    Why did the league object to the "Bears" so much? Isn't that the
    traditional name that Denver's minor league teams have had for years
    (until the ZerOfers recently). A LOT of expansion teams have kept the
    names of the minor league teams. The SD Padres, LA Angels and (I think)
    the Seattle Pilots were originally PCL teams and kept the names when
    they wnet Big-time. 
    
    Montreal Used to be a Dodger team known as the Royals, KC was the
    Blues, a Ynakee farm team, but all the other newer teams are relocated
    from somewhere else. Actually, I think the Milwaukee Brewers was the
    name of a team from a long time ago (pre-Braves) and they revived the
    name.
    
    ANY name is better than some of these ridiculous singular names that,
    unlike the leisure suit, survived beyond the '70s.
    
    Tom 
 | 
| 3.95 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri May 31 1991 14:54 | 5 | 
|  |     Baltimore's minor league team was the Orioles before the St Louis
    Browns moved there.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.96 | Da Managerial Procession OutTheDoor Continues!! | CELTIK::JACOB | DO NOTHING....and then Rest | Tue Jun 04 1991 00:24 | 5 | 
|  |     Buck Rodgers got the axe from the Expos today.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.97 | St. Pete, what're you gonna do with that dome? | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Jun 05 1991 11:44 | 10 | 
|  |     It's reported in both the Rocky Mountain News and the Miami Herald that
    the latest rumors indicate Miami and Denver will be awarded expansion
    franchises next week.  Miami is supposedly #1 on the list due to their
    strong financial ownership group.  
    
    But, there's also some bad news.  The latest rumor in Denver is that
    the team would be called the Grizzlies.  Stick with Rockies, guys.
    
    Joe
    
 | 
| 3.98 |  | CAM::WAY | Ruck till you puke... | Wed Jun 05 1991 12:47 | 7 | 
|  | HEY, what's wrong with Grizzlies?  There's a famous rugby team by that
name, and I think it's kind of manly....  Why it makes me think of some
of those stories Claywad tells.....
8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.99 | Miami?  Has to be a rumor. | SHALOT::MEDVID | Pittsburgh: city of champions again! | Wed Jun 05 1991 13:13 | 4 | 
|  |     No St. Pete?  What the hail are they going to do with that huge
    stadium?  I can't believe they would get snubbed.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.100 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jun 05 1991 13:38 | 4 | 
|  |     Hey, what happened to the Denver Elways?
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.101 |  | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:04 | 16 | 
|  |     
    	Grizzlies?  That's assa9 (er, I mean stupid)!  There hasn't
    	been a grizzly sighted in Colorado since 1976.  They should
    	call them the Bears (according to the opinion poll they
    	took).  Somebody from the proposed team management was
    	quoted as saying that they are hoping for the disenchantment
    	with the name "Rockies" will blow over.  That's a great way
    	to start off a team/city relationship.  
    
    	I personally vote for "Bears" due to the bad history
    	surrounding the "Colorado Rockies" name.
    
    	Rich, they couldn't find anybody to be the mascot (nobody
    	wif big 'nuff teef that is!)
    
    	Claybone
 | 
| 3.102 | What they should be named! | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Should I stay or should I go.... | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:09 | 9 | 
|  |     I like the Denver Marmots.  
    
    Or how bout the Denver Aspens?
    
    The Denver Water Rights?
    
    Nope, I like Denver Marmots...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.103 | Rockies = I think of Morganna | BASEX::BROWN |  | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:15 | 5 | 
|  |     
    I kind of like the Rockies.  You could get Morganna the Kissing Bandit
    to be the mascot for the team.  With those Mts. she would be perfect.
    
    \pjb
 | 
| 3.104 | 8^) | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:41 | 5 | 
|  | I still like the Colorado Collies, why not give the whole state somin'
to root for.
Steve
 | 
| 3.105 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:57 | 11 | 
|  |     
    The Miami Herald is reporting today that the Expansion Committee is
    definitely recommending the Miami franchise to the MLB owners, and 
    most likely the Denver franchise as the second expansion team.  The
    Miami team will be called the Florida Marlins, unless St. Pete gets the
    other team (unlikely), in which case they will be called the Miami
    Marlins.
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.106 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:12 | 5 | 
|  |     Marlins, huh? AMC used to make a car called a Marlin. Looked like an
    ugly AMC Javelin.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.107 |  | FMCSSE::BROWN | said the Joker to the Queen | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:21 | 2 | 
|  |     
    Rocky Mtn's Rejects
 | 
| 3.108 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | DO NOTHING....and then Rest | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:48 | 9 | 
|  |     
    Howsabout the Denver QuicheEaters????
    
    At least Elway would fit in!!!.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.109 | No new NL teams | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is walking!! | Thu Jun 06 1991 09:36 | 4 | 
|  | I didn't get a chance to read the story, but today's paper reports that the NL
expansion has been put on hold indefinitely.  Sorry Denver, Miami.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.110 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Jun 06 1991 11:09 | 10 | 
|  |     
> I didn't get a chance to read the story, but today's paper reports that the NL
> expansion has been put on hold indefinitely.  Sorry Denver, Miami.
    
    Not necessarily the expansion, just the announcement (which was
    supposed to be next week).  The NL and AL are still squabbling over the
    money...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.111 | Money and Politics, necessarily in that order :( | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Jun 06 1991 12:12 | 14 | 
|  |     This delay has COP-OUT written all over it.  It's kind typical of
    baseball after they put expansion off for so many years.
    
    As Glenn W. said, money is the big road block.  $190 million, and how 
    it will be distributed to be specific.  The AL wants their piece of the 
    pie, understandably so.  Also, there is the very small issue is how 
    much of a part the AL will play in the expansion draft.      
    
    You also have to wonder if the rumors yesterday about Miami and Denver
    being the 2 cities have anything to do with this wimpy-a$$ed coput. 
    St. Pete obviously doesn't like hearing that, and they the pressure 
    the committee to put the decision on the back burner to bide time.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.112 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | each 60 = 200 | Thu Jun 06 1991 20:25 | 20 | 
|  |     
    One of the things that I heard soured the announcement is the fact the
    guy guy who backed the Miami entry is having financial problems.  He
    owns Blockbuster Entertainment, and witn Markie and his friends having
    watched every video on earth already they are all now watching Nots
    Withstanding and other such soap operas.  Having lost much of the
    lucrative, velour covered, yuppie market, Blockbuster's stock has
    halved its price in about 9 months.  
    
    My guess at what happened is that they were ready to announce Dever and
    Miami, but got skeered because the guy with the bucks may not be
    around, so they decided to wait and see (after all, Dances with Wolves
    is coming out on video soon, so Markie will rent that).  If things are
    OK, Miami is in, if not it's St. Pete.
    
    Bruce
    
    PS  How about the Collar[ado] Sister Kissers?  Fits the state's image,
    is plural, and illiterative-- the 3 most important specifications for a
    team name.
 | 
| 3.113 |  | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Note | Fri Jun 07 1991 08:30 | 8 | 
|  |     Broose, them's fightin' woids.
    
    I *don't* watch Snots Landing.  Wifey-poo does.  In fack, my guitar
    lessons are on Thursdays, so pfftt.
    
    And how *did* I get pulled into this?
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.114 | Alliteracy hurts? | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949 | Fri Jun 07 1991 10:32 | 8 | 
|  | RE: .112
>>	Colorado Sister-Kissers ... illiterative ...
Was that an intentional misspelling, and innocent malaprop, or just
another Noter trying to sound *eddicated*...??   (;^})
- Steve, who's_always_trying_to_teach_our_native_language
 | 
| 3.115 | More on expansion | COGITO::HILL |  | Fri Jun 07 1991 11:15 | 58 | 
|  |     Yesterday's SI had an article about this topic. They rated the cities
    on several categories, such as population base, TV market, ballpark,
    proximity to other teams, etc. They also listed biggest asset & biggest
    drawbacks.
    
    For Miami the biggest drawback was the rainy summer weather, and the
    biggest asset was the megabucks guy, since, in addition to the $95 
    million expansion fee, teams need another $30-35 million just for minor 
    league infrastructure, front office, uniforms/equipment, players, etc. 
    This is not including ML payroll. Consider the salaries and the quality 
    of players these teams would get. Wes Gardner at $1.4 million a year....
    What a steal! 
    
    If the Miami owner is having $$ problems, it seems St. Pete would be a
    contendah. Either that, or an existing team (Seattle?) might be
    persuaded to move there. The draback is that they would play in an
    ug-lee dome with astro turf and air conditioning. A friend of mine in
    Florida said that even at night it's hotter than hell in the summer, so
    this it the only way they could get people to come out(in)doors. (Even
    Norman Schwartzkopf could only attract 28,000 to Tampa Stadium, so if
    you think they are going to pack an outdoor park to see Joe Hesketh 
    pitch to Daryl Boston...)
    
    Denver looks like a good bet, but is dependent on peripheral states
    for support, much like the KC Royals. As the only team in the Mountain
    time zone would also make travel easier as a stopover to the west
    coast.
    
    Orlando would have to play in the Royals spring training home, Baseball
    City for a few years until a new park was built. It is also hurt by
    being the 3rd chioce in Florida, and still reasonably close (2 hours?)
    to the Tampa-St. Pete area.
    
    Washington is too close to the Baltimore Orioles, who draw 20% of their
    fan base from the DC area. Also, the new park is a little closer to DC,
    so that would eventually raise the same questions that came up when the
    Senators left before. Vincent said they would "go where baseball
    isn't," so that certainly points to Denver and Florida, and not
    Washington.
    
    Buffalo shot itself in the foot by (very sanely) saying that it was too
    ridiculous to play high-cost baseball the way mediocre players were
    getting H-U-G-E contracts. They've got a nice park and reasonable
    ticket prices, which would certainly change if they joined the NL, so 
    they'll probably stay a triple A team. 
    
    The most important rule is that any city that proposes a singular name
    should be IMMEDIATELY dropped from the list. Miami Marlins is good,
    Buffalo Bisons is good, Washington Nationals is OK. Denver/Colarado, with
    Purple as their color, could be in trouble, depending on the second
    color (gold would be good, but they'll probably knuckle under to the 
    ski-yuppie crowd and go with mauve, teal, aqua, peach, etc.) Haven't heard
    anything about the Tampa-St.Pete name proposals, but as long as they
    don't consult the bozo that chose their hockey name they have a chance.
    The person who chose "Orlando Sun Rays" should be SHOT. It's just as
    well that they won't get a team.
    
    Tom     
 | 
| 3.116 | "Sun Rays" already in use | SHALOT::HUNT | Dust. Wind. Dude. | Fri Jun 07 1991 11:27 | 13 | 
|  |  �   The person who chose "Orlando Sun Rays" should be SHOT. It's just as
 �   well that they won't get a team.
 
 I'm not sure if it's been pointed out in here before or not but "Sun
 Rays" is *not* a new name ... 
 
 The Orlando Sun Rays are the Minnesota Twins' AA team and they play
 in the Southern League with teams from Charlotte, Birmingham,
 Knoxville, Memphis, Greenville, Chattanooga, and others ...
 
 For what it's worth ...
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.117 | :^) | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Note | Fri Jun 07 1991 12:12 | 14 | 
|  |   <<< Note 3.114 by SOFBAS::TRINWARD "Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949" >>>
                             -< Alliteracy hurts? >-
    Maybe you should practice what you preach?
    
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 13.1607                     TRADE RUMORS                       1607 of 1607
SOFBAS::TRINWARD "Maker of fine scrap-paper since 19" 0 lines   7-JUN-1991 11:02
                        -< Bring baczk the Spike-man! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
 | 
| 3.118 | FYI: | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949 | Fri Jun 07 1991 12:17 | 16 | 
|  | RE: previous note:
A typo 
	"baczk" 
due to too-fast fingers
does not equal a misused word 
	"illiterative",
... at least not in my book    8^}
- Steve, who's_still_trying_to_bring_baczk_(tm)_English_as_a_first_language
 | 
| 3.119 |  | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Jun 07 1991 12:27 | 5 | 
|  |     Steve, who's_always_trying_to_teach_our_native_language
    
    Just what Indian language are you trying to teach?
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.120 | The Hahahaha dialect... | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949 | Fri Jun 07 1991 13:14 | 0 | 
| 3.121 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Jun 10 1991 13:47 | 8 | 
|  |     Actually the holdup has to do with the Screen Animal Guild. You see,
    they are demanding a percentage of the prospective Denver/Colorado logo
    that will be on the outfield walls of many NL parks. Since Mr. Ed was a
    bona fide member of the SAG, royalty payments must be made by any team
    displaying the Denver/Colorado logo.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.122 |  | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Don't make me dream about you | Mon Jun 10 1991 15:08 | 3 | 
|  |     Rich, wouldn't the Colorado Lassies have the same dilemma?
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.123 | Right over my head, almost... | SOFBAS::TRINWARD | Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949 | Mon Jun 10 1991 15:19 | 19 | 
|  | RE: .121
>>   Actually the holdup has to do with the Screen Animal Guild. You see,
                                                   ^^^^^^ 
>>  they are demanding a percentage of the prospective Denver/Colorado logo
>>  that will be on the outfield walls of many NL parks. Since Mr. Ed was a
							       ^^^^^^
>>  bona fide member of the SAG, royalty payments must be made by any team
>>  displaying the Denver/Colorado logo.
    
>>   Rich
    
Whew!  I read that one quickly, and was trying figure out why the "Screen
Actors [sic] Guild" and "Mr. Ed (Asner)" would have problems with the
logo...
Clever, whether intended or not...!
- Steve, who_just_hopes_the_Stallions_don't_leave_too_many_*apples*_around
 | 
| 3.124 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Jun 10 1991 15:19 | 7 | 
|  |     Thas rite, Mark. The Collies or the Elways. Heck, even if it's the
    Grizzlies or the Bears, Gentle Ben's agent is liable to file suit. 
    
    Just that national anti-Denver bias coming to the forefront.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.125 | PLAY BALL, DENVER!!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Jun 11 1991 10:45 | 20 | 
|  |     It's all but official now, Denver will be playing in the NL starting
    with the 1993 season!  The expansion committee has recommended Denver 
    and Miami, as new cities, and the owners need only approve that
    recommendation.  That official approval could come tomorrow at the
    owners' meeting, but most likely won't happen for about 2 or 3 weeks.
    
    Team colors are purple, black, and silver.  It's a nice color scheme,
    but I've always felt 3 colors were one too many.  The Seachickens are the
    only team I can think of that use three colors other than white.  A
    logo and team name are expected to be unveiled in the next 7-10 days.
    
    According to Baseball Tonight last night, the Miami team will be called
    either the South Florida or Miami Marlins.  They should go with Miami
    IMO.  I can't see why they don't want to call them Florida, because
    there's a good chance St. Pete could get a team within the next decade
    or so either by exapansion or another team moving there.  I just don't
    think South Florida would sound good.
    
    Joe
    
 | 
| 3.126 | $$$ | SHALOT::MEDVID | Pittsburgh: city of champions again! | Tue Jun 11 1991 11:05 | 14 | 
|  |     RE: South Florida
    
    Having lived and worked in Boca Raton in the past, I can understand the
    push for this moniker.  Miami is the hub of South Florida (a.k.a. the
    Gold Coast), but the spokes (Boca, Ft. Lauderdale, Delray Beach, Palm
    Beach, Hollywood, Miami Beach etc.) like to think of themselves as part
    of the whole picture...when the picture is good.  They distance
    themselves from Miami when you talk of crime and other negatives.  This
    is just another effort for all the Gold Coast wealthies to feel a part
    of what will be a "nice thing" about the area.
    
    Wasn't the Marlins the name of a team Miami once had? 
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.127 | More than double your money in 7 years | BASEX::BROWN |  | Tue Jun 11 1991 11:26 | 8 | 
|  |     
    Back in 1984 when Tom Monaghan bought the Tigers he paid $50 million.
    
    Not a bad return on his investment if a new team cost $95 million 
    plus $35 million franchise fee.
    
    \pjb
    
 | 
| 3.128 | M's will be here for the 90's at least... | DECWET::METZGER | How about those M's? | Tue Jun 11 1991 14:55 | 15 | 
|  | 
What's all this talk about the Mariners possibly moving to St. Pete in the 
future? The team has a long term lease on the kingdome and they've been drawing
pretty good crowds for the past 2 seasons. 
I haven't heard a word about it locally but ESPN and CNN seem to mention this
rumor with every breath.
I could see the Indians moving out of Cleveland for St. Pete but I don't see the
M's moving in the near future. Now that they've got a decent team they should
remain in the area (and draw fairly well) for quite some time. If they had a 
decent stadium (removable roof) they'd draw even better.
Metz
 | 
| 3.129 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Jun 11 1991 15:07 | 10 | 
|  |     
    I think the Indians and Astros are the most likely candidates to
    be making moves...
    
    glenn
    
    
    
    
                                                    
 | 
| 3.130 |  | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | LA:Mother of all comebacks | Tue Jun 11 1991 15:18 | 14 | 
|  |     
    	I can see the Indians possibly making a move, but why the Astros?
    Are they doing that badly in Houston & the Dome?
    
    	After all the years of carrot dangling, it's about time that 
    Denver got a baseball team.  Granted the team won't be competitive
    for a few years, but it will draw good crowds as there are lots of
    transplants from all over the country and they brought their previous
    baseball allegiances with them.  Plus, it would give the Donks some
    serious competition as for sports attention.  Not to mention that I'd
    get a chance to see the Mets whenever they're in town. :-)
    
    
    						 glen j.
 | 
| 3.131 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 11 1991 16:29 | 3 | 
|  |     I believe that the 'Stros are for sale.  After spending the last few
    years in the cellar, excercising a self imposed salary cap, and dumping
    players, the attendance isn't what it was.
 | 
| 3.132 | Soapbox Time | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Jun 11 1991 16:31 | 28 | 
|  |     I am totally against naming a franchise after a state. The California
    Angels should be the LA Angels. They draw heavily from LA County,
    probably have games televised by LA stations and probably have games
    aired on LA radio stations.
    
    Ditto Minnesota North Stars, Twins and Vikings. Name them either
    Minneapolis or St. Paul. But pick one!
    
    Ditto Texas Rangers - Should be Dallas or Ft Worth Rangers. Pick one.
    Does Arlington have a TV or radio station?
    
    Golden State Warriors sounds ridiculous to me. Call 'em either San
    Francisco or Oakland Warriors.
    
    New England Patriots should be either the Boston or Providence
    Patriots. I lean towards Boston because advertising revenues to Boston
    stations is higher.
    
    New Jersey Devils should be called the Hackensack Devils.
    
    Griffith started this trend in 1960 when he moved the Senators to
    Minneapolis and called the team the Minnesota Twins. Then Finley got a
    hockey franchise and called them the California Golden Seals. 
    
    I don't like it.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.133 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Jun 11 1991 16:47 | 5 | 
|  |     Whoops - forgot the Utah Jazz. Now someone tell me THAT name makes
    sense!
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.134 |  | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Poconose no boundries! | Tue Jun 11 1991 18:27 | 10 | 
|  |     .133�    Whoops - forgot the Utah Jazz. Now someone tell me THAT name makes
    .133�    sense!
    
    	You're right..THAT name dosen't make sense..but the original team
    came from New Orleans...and THAT name does make sence.
    
    HTH's
    
    B.A.
    
 | 
| 3.135 | L.A. DREAMING | WMOIS::E_FASSETT |  | Wed Jun 12 1991 12:20 | 11 | 
|  |     RE: 132
    
    The California Angels should never be called the L.A. Angels. If
    anything it should be the Anahiem Angels, also the L.A. Rams should be
    the Anaheim Rams. Both these teams are in Orange County, and are about
    an hour drive from Los Angeles. Although they do draw a lot of fans frm
    L.A county the majority of people who attend these games come from
    Orange County.
    
    ED who used to live in L.A. (it was only 5 minutes to Dodger Stadium
    but an hour to Anahiem stadium).
 | 
| 3.136 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Jun 12 1991 12:32 | 3 | 
|  |     	Hey Rich, how do you know the New York Giants/Yankees/Mets/Rangers
    /Knicks/Jets aren't really using the state name and not the city
    name?
 | 
| 3.137 | Yeah, and since when did New England become a STATE??? | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Wed Jun 12 1991 12:49 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.138 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jun 12 1991 13:18 | 8 | 
|  |     re /Don - ya GOT me, big guy.
    
    re Angels and Rams. 
    
    Anaheim is OK by me.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.139 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 12 1991 13:51 | 5 | 
|  |     I have no problem with a team being associated with an area, be it New
    England or a state.  They draw fans from a much larger area than the
    city they play in, so why not have the team name reflect their fan
    base?  You also have several teams which play their games in the
    suburbs and not in the city they are named after.
 | 
| 3.140 |  | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Wed Jun 12 1991 13:52 | 9 | 
|  |     
    	Well, I've changed my mind regarding the team name for the
    	Denver/Colorado franchise.  In honor of all those mountain
    	men we used to/still have, they should be called the Denver/
    	Colorado "Johnsons" (you know, as in Jeremiah!) :^)
    
    	Claybone
    
    	ps  Yeehaw!  I get to see the Reds play now!
 | 
| 3.141 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Should I stay or should I go.... | Wed Jun 12 1991 20:12 | 5 | 
|  |     I think the NY Jets should be known as the RON Jets.
    
    HTH
    
    HH
 | 
| 3.142 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Let's get it together ... | Thu Jun 13 1991 18:56 | 5 | 
|  |     I read in today's Hearld that DAve Dravecky will undergo surgery next
    Tuesday to amputate his left arm in an effort to stop infection and arm
    problems as a result of the tumors that he had.
    
    Sad.
 | 
| 3.143 |  | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Jun 14 1991 07:06 | 4 | 
|  |     Yeah, I read that today, too.  What a shame.  The poor guy has already
    had a very bad time with it, and now it's past saving.
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.144 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Jun 14 1991 09:25 | 11 | 
|  |     
    > Yeah, I read that today, too.  What a shame.  The poor guy has already
    > had a very bad time with it, and now it's past saving.
    
    The irony is that the comeback he made, which eventually resulted in
    him breaking it twice, probably cost him the use of the arm.  He has no
    regrets though, and I've got to admire him for deciding to go ahead and
    do what he loved best at whatever risk...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.145 |  | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is a toddler now! | Mon Jun 17 1991 10:09 | 5 | 
|  | Loved those mid'60s uniforms that Cinci and Philladelphia wore yesterday!  It
was a great throwback.  Was it some kind of old timers day or something in 
Philly?
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.146 | Tougher than his previous come back | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Thu Jun 20 1991 10:27 | 7 | 
|  |     
    For the record, Dave Dravecky had his arm and shoulder amputated
    yesterday to keep his cancer from spreading.  Doctors are not
    commenting, but all indications is that he should recover soon and get
    on with his life.
    
    
 | 
| 3.147 | Hope I'm right! | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is a toddler now! | Thu Jun 20 1991 11:11 | 8 | 
|  | RE: Dravecky
I had heard that doctors stated that his prognosis for rull recovery was "very 
good".
Wish him the best.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.148 | Charlotte worth mentioning... | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:27 | 24 | 
|  |     Last night, some big hoohas were in Charlotte to attend a Charlotte
    Knights baseball game and consider the site for expansion to one of the
    new AAA clubs.
    
    The Knights' only gimmic to get people to the park was to be a softball
    game between the Hornets and the local media.  However, at about 5:30
    the skies opened up in a big way.  The softball game was cancelled. 
    The weather cleared around gametime enough to start playing ball
    in front of
    
    
    
    9,200+ fans. 
    
    When you consider the weather conditions and the fact that they weren't
    giving away a car or a year's supply of Spam or anything like that,
    that's mighty impressive.  These league officials had attended a 
    Birmingham Barons (also in the running for AAA) game the night before
    for a game that attracted just under 6,000 on a 3 for the price of 1
    ticket giveaway.
    
    Bob Hunt, it's gonna happen!
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.149 | Alright !!! | GOLDKY::HUNT | I just want to help the ballclub ... | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:55 | 18 | 
|  |  That's great news, Dan'l.   
 
 If I had been in town, it would have been 9,200+ plus 1.
 
 For the record, the Charlotte Knights were the attendance leaders in *all*
 of AA ball lasted year and they outdrew many AAA teams as well.  And the
 team was brutal.   The record for one night was 12,500+ in a 10,000 seat
 stadium with grassy overflow areas.   That was the night "The Chicken" was
 in town.   He really is a hoot.
 
 This year the team is just a little better than lasted year's wretched
 squad and the attendance is hanging in there, too.   9,200 has to be the
 top crowd of the year so far since "The Chicken" hasn't been there yet
 this year.
 
 AAA ball in Charlotte ???   Has a nice ring to it.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.150 | Chicken & Clown Prince have come and gone | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Fri Jun 21 1991 09:14 | 9 | 
|  |     For the record, Bob, you missed The Chicken.  Last Friday, Max Padkin
    was there and Saturday was The Chicken's night.  Cliff and I went, but
    when we got to the exit at 6:30 and the traffic was backed up to the
    welcome center (1 mile) we turned around and went to a sports bar in
    Dilworth.
    
    See ya tonight, dude.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.151 | Damn! | GOLDKY::HUNT | I just want to help the ballclub ... | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:12 | 10 | 
|  |  Dan'l,
 
 What was the attendance for Chicken Night lasted Friday in Charlotte ??? 
 
 Also, I believe The Chicken will be in Charlotte *twice* this season.   In
 addition, the Phillie Phanatic will be there, too, for a one-game visit in
 August sometime.   You know me and the MicroHUNTs will be there for that
 one.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.152 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:34 | 3 | 
|  |     It was reported in the Baseball conference that the Denver franchise
    has settled on a name of the team.  They will be caled the Colorado
    Rockies and have a bear as a mascot.
 | 
| 3.153 |  | CAM::WAY | Toonces, the Rugby Playing Cat.... | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:54 | 9 | 
|  | re Denver: 
	Darn, I was hoping for the "Rocky Mountain Oysters".....
re Chicken Night:
	When they have Smelt Night, could someone please let me know....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.154 | Pi-Rights | SHALOT::MEDVID | kiss them for me | Tue Jul 09 1991 13:23 | 12 | 
|  |     Up until two days ago, the Pirates had maintained the best winning
    percentage in baseball (LA surpassed them by one game Saturday). 
    However, there are only two Pirates on the NL All-Star team, Bobby
    Bonilla and John Smiley.  
    
    That's either the mark of a great team playing as a team, a terrific
    bench, a great manager, or a combination of all three.
    
    And if you ask me, Bonilla doesn't necessarily deserve to be there let
    alone starting at DH hitting .286.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.155 | Dion skipping out during race... | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is a toddler now! | Thu Aug 01 1991 09:01 | 9 | 
|  | dan'l mentioned Dion Sanders in the Pittsburgh Pirates note, and it reminded me
of something I saw in the paper this morning.  It said that he is supposed to 
report to Falcon training camp nexted week.  The story I read said that he asked for some
time off in between, and that the Falcons said no.
Kinda stinks for the Braves, who are in the middle (okay, the outskirts of the
middle) of a pennant fight, to lose a starting player.  I guess $$$ rules again.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.156 | tick tick tick | SHALOT::MEDVID | boys have wants, girls have needs | Thu Aug 01 1991 09:45 | 7 | 
|  |     Sanders is only starting because the Braves, like the Bucs, are hit by
    the injury train (as Jake so eloquently put it).  He was only hitting
    around .200.  
    
    Countdown to Deon Doom starts this Sunday.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.157 | Possibly the best game of the year (and I was there!) | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Aug 02 1991 08:54 | 26 | 
|  |     re: .-1
    
    No, Deion didn't start because of injuries.  The Braves gave him a
    start because it was his last (baseball) game of the year.  The timing
    worked out well because it allowed Ron Gant to serve a 1-game
    suspension at the same time.  Whoever made the decision to start him
    deserves a kudo, cause his 3-run homer was *huge*.  
    
    I was at the game and the fans of Atlanta seem to be taking an actual
    liking to the young man.  Every at-bat was greeted with decent applause
    - absolutely no booing.  (His BA was around .190.)  When he hit the HR
    the fans *demanded* a curtain call, and when the Braves pulled a
    double-switch in the 7th and took him out he got a rousing standing
    "O", which "Prime Time" responded to by blowing kisses to the 23K on
    hand!
    
    One other note from the game - apparently Ted and Jane were in
    attendance.  Turner visited with the team before the game before
    heading for his owners box.  Then, with the Braves trailing 6-1
    they both left, only to miss probably the most stirring comeback
    of the whole season!  Haw haw haw!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
 | 
| 3.158 |  | FDCV06::KING | If the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Aug 02 1991 09:30 | 5 | 
|  |     Knorr.. as in Snorr... :-} Just kidding.. Sanders got the start because
    Gant drop his appeal for a 1 game suspension.... Gant figured he had
    better take the game now instead of waiting until September....
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.159 | Factual correction is necessary | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Aug 02 1991 10:11 | 7 | 
|  |     Rong, REK.  Gant decided to take his 1-game suspension cause the Braves
    wanted to give Deion a start on his last game of the year.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.160 |  | FDCV06::KING | If the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Aug 02 1991 10:18 | 3 | 
|  |     Isn't that what I said Snorr?????
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.161 | Knorr and T: Bandwagon Bloodbrothers | SHALOT::MEDVID | boys have wants, girls have needs | Mon Aug 05 1991 09:11 | 6 | 
|  |     What's this?  Chris Knorr suddenly an Atlanta Braves fan...now that
    they're winning?!?  Seems the same thing happened with a guy named Mr.T
    around the time a certain hockey team began winning.  You two do have
    something in common!!!
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.162 | Fair weather fans in Dixie ???   Yessiree ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Pee Wee's Bogus Adventure ??? | Mon Aug 05 1991 11:50 | 32 | 
|  |  My thoughts exactly, Dan'l ....
 
 Used to be you could have your very own personal *section* in
 Atlanta-Fulton County.    Just you and a hundred other empty seats
 around you.
 
 Now, it's oh-so-chic in Hotlanta to be a Braves fan.   Apparently,
 they're even doing some sort of new group cheering activity in
 Bravesville.   Called the "Tomahawk Chop" or something like that. 
 
 Seems as though, when cued by appropriate stereotyped tom-tom music,
 all the nouveau fans stand up and start making chop-chop motions with
 their right arms simulating a group scalping, I guess.
 
 Wonder how long it'll be before a Native American rights activist
 group gets the clever idea to spring a lawsuit claiming some sort of
 prejudicial harm done to their image.    Hmmm ???
 
 I guess it's better than The Wave, though.   Would have liked to have
 seen the one guy in the stands doing the Tomahawk Chop a few years
 ago.  Probably would have been arrested on suspicion of doing the
 Pee-Wee Thang.
 
 Atlanta is still the *ONLY* sports town in the country with at least
 three major league teams ... all of whom have *never* even played for
 a world championship title.    Perfect for Tar Heel fans !!!
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  Atlanta's sports stock has jumped big time in the non-pro
 ranks, however.   Georgia Tech's 1/2 national title lasted year and
 the Olympics in 1996 are prime time accomplishments.
 | 
| 3.163 | Bandwagon jumper?  Absolutely. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Aug 05 1991 11:56 | 13 | 
|  |     I plead "GUILTY" to the charges of 'Braves Bandwagon Jumping', along
    with an estimated 2,000,000 other Atlanta residents.  In our defense
    I would only raise the issue of how hapless this franchise has been for
    so long.  Guess it took a Tar Heel fan (and our storied history of
    Consistent Excellence) to turn things around.
    
    (BTW Ketch, the equation with Carolina basketball with Atlanta based on
     the non-Title metric is wholly false and bogus, cause in 1982 Michael
     Jordan hit a baseline jumper to give UNC a victory over Georgetown
     in the NCAA Tournament finals.  HTH.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.164 | "Starvin' Marvin" Freeman for President! | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | You watch too much TV kid | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:32 | 9 | 
|  |     re Bob Hunt it's not just in Dixie, here in Southern NH/Northeastern MA
    I'm seeing a LOT more people wearing Braves' hats this year than in the
    recent past.
    
    (that being said the Braves are my favorite NL team, hope they can pull
    it off...)
                
    
    py
 | 
| 3.165 |  | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dude without a 'tude | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:20 | 5 | 
|  |     
    The Boston Braves.  Yep, one of my favorite teams too.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.166 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:52 | 36 | 
|  |     Bob Hunt mentioned that attending Braves games is the "in" thing in
    Atlanta now. I don't dispute that but I would like to bring up a lousy
    situation in good old Boston.
    
    Going back only 4-5 years ago, one could almost assure themselves of a
    bleacher seat for any Red Sox game at the gate except versus the
    Yankees, on Opening Day or on Patriots' Day. Of course, during some
    late months, when the Sox were in the thick of a pennant race, seats
    became scarce.
    
    But now, it is quite unlikely to get a seat the day of the game at
    Fenway. Sure, much of the crowd are dedicated baseball fans who would
    support the team through thick and thin. But it's almost gotten to the
    point where those frustrated yuppies who couldn't get a Celtic season
    ticket now get a Red Sox season ticket. 
    
    And I wouldn't say Atlanta is alone in wagon jumping. Houston and
    Cleveland had huge crowds when the teams were winning. When the Yankees
    stumbled through the first 1/3 of the season this year, fans were hard
    to find - sans George even. Then the Yanks put together a respectable
    winning streak and fans returned.
    
    As far as the Braves go, I think they are somehow a darling of fans.
    When in Milwaukee they captured the imagination of the country as they
    dominated in the late 50's, dethroned the Yankees once and paraded a
    list of greats like Spahn, Matthews and Aaron before the public.
    
    Turner tried to label them America's team through TBS but that never
    worked. But they have their old uniforms back, have cultivated good
    talent through their farm system, made wise trades and hired a pretty
    good baseball mind in Bobby Cox. They lack that one charismatic person
    to put them into the national spotlight. Justice isn't that yet,
    Niether is Nixon or Glavine. But they are close......
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.167 | It's the long haul that counts; not the high points | SHALOT::HUNT | RIP, Chris Short | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:34 | 30 | 
|  |  It's only natural for more fans to attend more games when the team is
 winning.   Nobody argues with that and it's one of the primary
 reasons why an owner would want the best team possible in the first
 place.
 
 What is arguable is the raw spread between low points and high
 points.   If the Red Sox have a great year, they pack all 33,000
 seats in Fenway.   Jam 'em in butt cheek to butt cheek.   If they
 sip, they draw, what, only 30,000 per game ???
 
 Same thing in Philly.   When the Phils do well, they pack in 35,000
 to 40,000 every single night.   If they do poorly, they draw 25,000
 to 30,000 every single night.   Fans in Philly are legendary for
 their preference for the Phils.   Back in 1981 or '82, I think, a
 Game 7 between the Sixers and the Bucks drew only 7,000 fans while
 more than 35,000 saw a Phillies-Cubs game across the street.
 
 You can say that about a lot of teams ... Toronto draws well, win or
 lose.  So do the Cubs.
 
 But when the Braves can have season after season full of games with,
 like, maybe 5,000 fans or less in the seats and then zoom up to over
 20,000 to 25,000 per night, then you've got bandwagon jumping.
 
 It's not evil or anything like that.  It's just not quite proper, as
 the English would say.   You've got to suffer in the bad times in
 order to earn real spurs as a true-blue fan.   Braves fans don't
 count yet.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.168 | But it'd be nice to see 'em win the west regardless | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:55 | 10 | 
|  |     Let's take what Bob Hunt said one step further.  Pittsburgh.  When
    Pittsburgh had the terrible teams between 81-88, Three Rivers was like
    a ghost town.  Yet, not a day went by when you didn't talk about what
    the Bucs did last night.
    
    In Atlanta, people didn't even give a darn about the Braves until this
    year.  Atlanta, as a city, is made up of bandwagon jumpers.  Don't
    believe me?  Ask the Falcons.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.169 | BTW, the Tomahawk Cheer is cool! (Much better than The Wave) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:01 | 19 | 
|  |     re: Atlanta (bandwagon town)
    
    I don't disagree with this.  I think the reason for it is two-fold:
    
    1. Atlanta is a very transient city.  People come.  People go.  In
       our subdivision if you've been here more than 2 years you're
       considered an old-timer.
    
    2. Atlanta sports teams have had a long, storied history of LOSING.
       Now it's true that the BoSox haven't won a Title since time
       immortal, but they always have a competitive product on the field.
       Not so for the Braves, Falcons, or Hawks.
    
    Additionally the south is very much into the college game, especially
    college football down here.  The papers are chalked-full of college
    football on a daily basis from now until January.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.170 | Please God, don't let Atlanta win the NL West | CELTIK::JACOB | Beer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38 | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:11 | 16 | 
|  |     
             <<< Note 3.168 by SHALOT::MEDVID "time is eternal" >>>
            -< But it'd be nice to see 'em win the west regardless >-
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Dan'l,
    
        May I remind you that the Braves beat the living sh!t out of the
    Bucs this year.  The Bucs went 0-6 in Fulton County Stadium and 3-3 in
    3 Rivers vs the Braves.   Personally, I hope someone else wins the West
    'cause the Bucs will have a helluva time vs. the Braves cause the
    Braves seem to have the Pirates number this year.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.171 | Atlanta's Tomahawk Cheer: Mass Yuppie Masterbation | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:39 | 27 | 
|  | >    1. Atlanta is a very transient city.  People come.  People go. 
    So why aren't they coming and going like they used to?  Nope, Atlanta
    reminds me very much of the Brie-eating, champagne-sipping yuppie
    Northstar fans...and you've joined their company, Chris.  
    You see, it's the thing to do.  "Let's go to a baaaaaaallgame, Muffy." 
    No one went to Falcons games until last year, but then it became the
    thing to do because Glanville came to town and changed the uniforms to
    a chic black base.  "Bravo.  Encore, old chap!  Pass the caviar for my
    Chic-Fil-A, Bifboy.  Thanks, you are a dear."
    And as soon as the Braves start losing again, you'll see the signs of
    old: "Go Braves...and take the Falcons with you!"
    Jake,
    You don't have to remind me of the Bucs skid in Hotlanta.  The best
    part about Atlanta winning the west would be the Bucs going back to
    Fulton County Stadium and womping their wigwam right there in front of
    their tomahawking fans...you know, the cheer they stole from Florida
    State.
    Let's see how much Knorr like that cheer when the Seminoles are beating
    the crap out of UNC every year.
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.172 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Aug 06 1991 11:36 | 20 | 
|  |     Interesting how some cities support teams maniacally while shunning
    other teams. 
    
    Take the Braves. In their last year in Boston I believe thier total
    attendance for the year was slightly over 200,000. While the Red Sox
    pulled in over 1,000,000. This just 3 years after the Braves won the NL
    pennant!
    
    Bob Hunt - do you recall the disparity between the Philadelphia
    Athletics and Phillies? And, in THAT case, the Athletics were the
    franchise with the most success, weren't they?
    
    Boston is wild about the Celtics, Red Sox and Bruins. Crowds are over
    85% of capacity regardless of how they do. Yet they only fill the
    stands in Foxboro if the Patriots are winning.
    
    Interesting.........
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.174 |  | MAXWEL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 06 1991 12:19 | 4 | 
|  |     The Patriots are relatively rookies in the New England sports scene. 
    Add to that their not so-impressive record and the grassroots following
    of the older Giants and they really don't have a strong base of loyal
    fans.
 | 
| 3.175 | Philly an NL city since 1883 | SHALOT::HUNT | Who invented liquid soap and why ??? | Tue Aug 06 1991 12:20 | 20 | 
|  |  �   Bob Hunt - do you recall the disparity between the Philadelphia
 �   Athletics and Phillies? And, in THAT case, the Athletics were the
 �   franchise with the most success, weren't they?
 
 *MUCH* more successful.   Connie Mack won 10 pennants and 5 World
 Series with the A's in Philly.   They won the AL pennant in 1929,
 1930, and 1931 when both Ruth and Gehrig were in the absolute prime
 of their careers up in Yankee Stadium.
 
 The A's had beaucoup Hall Of Famers ... Waddell, Bender, Plank,
 Collins, Dykes, Foxx, Grove, and so on ...    
 
 The Phillies won 2 pennants and lost the Series both times yet the
 Phils consistently outdrew the A's.   And they shared Shibe Park for
 many of those years, too.
 
 An amazing situation ... Finally, the A's moved to Kansas City in the
 mid 1950's and the Phillies had the whole town to themselves.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.176 |  | CAM::WAY | Call her up on the spank line | Tue Aug 06 1991 12:22 | 20 | 
|  | Well, I think a lot has to do with how the team is perceived by the
fans, not just how they're doing.
If the fans perceive ineptitude in the front office, then they tend to
discount the team.  While the Sox have ineptitude in the front office,
they have years and years of tradition and history (and some excellent
losses and almost theres) to offset the fans tendency to stay away.
The Patriots have a jackass in the front office, who's managed to put
his feet in his mouth a couple of times...
I like to look at the Whalers.  With no winning tradition, and with
sheer ineptitude running rampant in the front office, and continually
rising ticket prices, the fans are saying "Forget about it...."
These aren't the only factors though.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.177 | Come on 1993! | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | MandelaMarcusMalcolmMartinMarley | Tue Aug 06 1991 23:41 | 32 | 
|  |     re: fans
    
       It will be interesting to see how the many fans the Colorado
    Rockies draw in comparison to the Broncos, especially if and 
    when they become good enough to challange for the pennant.  
       
       The Broncos were Colorado's first ever major league sports 
    franchise and have consistenly sold out since '69, excluding 
    strike years.  Ever since the franchise beginnings they've had 
    a virtual monopoly on the Denver sports scene.  All the other 
    happenings, barely receive any notice.  Everyone breathes, eats, 
    drinks, and farts Broncos.  Granted, Denver isn't like Chicago or 
    Boston, larger cities that have long histories of great atheletes 
    and competitive teams.  But even in the relatively short period
    of time since 1960, some competitive teams and players have 
    passed through.  Like David Thompson, Dan Issel, Alex English, 
    the early/mid 70s CU Buffs, the '85 Air Force Football team.  
    Big deal.  To hear the fans and media tell it, the Broncos are 
    *it*. 	
                                                               
       CUs 1990 national championship season is the lone exception 
    thus far.  Even their glory is short-lived as another August 
    rolls around and the media camps out in Greeley and gives daily
    updates about the Broncos.
    
       I'd expect the Rockies(hope that name isn't a bad omen) to
    do well for their first 2 seasons.  Then the newness will wear
    off and we'll see what happens.
    
    
                                                 glen j.  
    
 | 
| 3.178 |  | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 07 1991 09:56 | 3 | 
|  |     Glenn, you forgot to mention the several National Championships Air
    Force has rung up in Rugby.  Then again, by not mentioning it, you
    probably make your point even better.
 | 
| 3.179 |  | CAM::WAY | Call her up on the spank line | Wed Aug 07 1991 10:54 | 7 | 
|  | Mac, 
You and Glen both forgot to mention the National Club Champion Denver
Barbarians, for 1990....
Hope this helps,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.180 | The Rockies will FLY | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Wed Aug 07 1991 13:40 | 8 | 
|  | Yo Glen you also forgot to mention that World Arena Football championship 
that the Denver Gold won in 88' 
I suspect that the Rockies will have big Draw every summer till about Mid-July
when they have been mathmatically eliminated from the rest of the Division. 
Kind like the Braves, Mariners, Cubs, Indians, White Sox....
 | 
| 3.181 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | TheOrigionalKegOBeerMentality | Wed Aug 07 1991 14:45 | 1 | 
|  |     I'll be there whenever the Dodgers are there!
 | 
| 3.182 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Wed Aug 07 1991 15:16 | 12 | 
|  |     Hey Jeff, that was the Denver Dynamite that won the Arena Football
    championship a few years back.  Come on, don't you know you're Arena
    Football trivia? :^) :^)  The Denver Gold played in the USFL.
    
    It would be fairly safe to say the Rockies will draw 3 mil their first
    year.  There will be the obvious large crowds at the beginning, but
    there will be a 2nd stage of excitement in mid-'94 or '95 when the new
    stadium opens.  In their early years, I would think crowds will start
    to shrink in August & September when they're in or near last place and
    football season is starting up.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.183 | Don't want to sit upper deck outfield at Miami! | SHALOT::MEDVID | time is eternal | Wed Aug 07 1991 15:24 | 11 | 
|  |     I was told last week that Florida (Miami) is going to play in Joe
    Rob-me Stadium.  Is this true?  If so, won't that be a sh!tty place to
    watch a game.  It's not like the cirular stadiums of Cinci, Philly,
    Pitt, etc.  It's a football stadium (big enough to play world class
    soccer on).
    
    Montreal played in an unmodified Olympic Stadium for several years and
    had no right field or center field seats.  It was like a cavernous
    tomb.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.184 | I don't believe it. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Aug 07 1991 15:46 | 17 | 
|  |     > It would be fairly safe to say the Rockies will draw 3 mil their
    > first year.
    
    Come back?  3,000,000 is an awful lot - that's an *average* of close
    to 37K per night!  Very few teams in baseball history have reached this
    lofty number.  (The Dodgers have done it alot and I think Toronto has
    also.)
    
    I was at a Nuggets game a few years ago and, despite a very competitive
    product (this was obviously before the Paul Westhaid fiasco) there were
    only around 8,000 bodies in the building.  Hopefully they'll support
    baseball better than hoops ...
    
    If the Rockies draw more than 2mil I'll be impressed ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.185 | NL pennant races | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:11 | 4 | 
|  |     Braves won last night to go � up on the Dodgers before gametime of the
    Dodgers and Pirates.  Who won between LA and Pittsburgh, and between
    the Cardnals and ??? ?
    
 | 
| 3.186 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:21 | 2 | 
|  |     Pittsburgh defeated LA.  Braves now have a full game lead on the
    Dodgers.
 | 
| 3.187 | final | CTHQ3::LEARY |  | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:23 | 8 | 
|  |     dan'l
    
    St.Louis 2 - Sand Diego 1
    Pittsburgh 6- LA 4
    
    MikeL
    Closet Bucs fan (when Sox sux)
    
 | 
| 3.188 | Who'da thunked it? | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:34 | 8 | 
|  |     Thanks for the responses.  Atlanta leads the west.  How about that.
    
>    St.Louis 2 - Sand Diego 1
    
    Are you sure this isn't reversed?  Someone just told me SD won and the
    Bucs are up 5 games in the east.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.189 | whoops | CTHQ3::LEARY |  | Thu Aug 29 1991 10:42 | 4 | 
|  |     Pardonez-moi
    
    Twas SD 2, St. Loo 1. Sorry. Hurst wins 15th
    
 | 
| 3.190 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | SPORTS Goodfellows-Schneid,MrT,Jo* | Thu Aug 29 1991 12:37 | 3 | 
|  |     	The Braves were always one of my favorite National League teams.
    
    				/Do*
 | 
| 3.191 | Anything can happen | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS |  | Thu Aug 29 1991 13:55 | 3 | 
|  |     THe Braves who ??? Is this the Atlanta Braves....What were the odds
    against the braves to go to the World Series at the begining of the
    season...The Braves are better then the Redsox's..What a YEar
 | 
| 3.192 | 2 UP! | 10881::DEVLIN_JO | Will the Pernicious Gits Repeat? | Fri Aug 30 1991 12:04 | 8 | 
|  |     YEah, and the Braves have all those pitchers like Glavine and Smoltz
    and Avery that Sox fans said weren't worth trading the likes of Mike
    GreenTeeth for....
    
    Terry Pendleton and Otis Nixon were fantastic pickups, and Sid Bream
    was activated yesterday (got 2 hits).   The Dodgers lost again...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.193 | Brave New World | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | SPORTS Goodfellows-Schneid,MrT,Jo* | Fri Aug 30 1991 12:42 | 5 | 
|  |     	What Red Sox fans are those JD?  The fictional ones you make
    up in your haid?  Darryl Strawberry better start worrying about
    the Braves now!
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.194 | Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! (etc.) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:22 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.195 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Will the Pernicious Gits Repeat? | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:22 | 4 | 
|  |     Naw /Don - the clique in the Red Sox note.  Heck, most of 'em wouldn't
    trade Greenwell for Canseco and Rickey Henderson even up.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.196 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:32 | 4 | 
|  |     At the time the rumors of Greenwell going to Atlanta were flying, the
    Braves pitching staff looked very sorry indeed.  It took them a couple
    of years to finally live up to their potential.  Who knows, the Braves
    may go the way of the Orioles of a couple of years ago.
 | 
| 3.197 | You're not going to get 100% agreement anywhere... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 30 1991 15:31 | 9 | 
|  |     
    > Naw /Don - the clique in the Red Sox note.  Heck, most of 'em wouldn't
    > trade Greenwell for Canseco and Rickey Henderson even up.
      
    Dream on, JD.  Greenwell has had his very vocal detractors for quite
    some time now...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.198 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Will the Pernicious Gits Repeat? | Fri Aug 30 1991 15:46 | 11 | 
|  |     Glenn-
    
    Dream on yourself.   I've yet to see an intelligent trade discussion in
    that file.  Perhaps this year, finally, folks are thinking they could
    dump Mikey or Ellis - now that their worth is down.
    
    I knnow that no matter what I say, you'll say the opposite.
    
    The world is round.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.199 | I repeat, you'll get 100% agreement *nowhere* | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 30 1991 15:59 | 18 | 
|  |     
    > Dream on yourself.   I've yet to see an intelligent trade discussion in
    > that file.
      
    Now this much I'll agree with.  Most of the trade suggestions are
    along the lines of dealing a Greenwell or a Burks for Vince Coleman
    or Gary Pettis, fercripessake!  Talk about overcompensation!
    
    > I knnow that no matter what I say, you'll say the opposite.
      
    No, I reject the notion that the world of Boston sports fans is
    a single-minded collection of know-nothings that can only be wrong
    because they don't agree with you.  If you have a point, make it.
    You don't have to insult the intelligence of anyone who happens
    to be a Boston Red Sox fan to do so...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.200 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Will the Pernicious Gits Repeat? | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:50 | 26 | 
|  |     Glenn -
    
    Since I'm a Sox fan, I don't hold the views that *you* seem to think
    that I do.  There are a vast majority of boston fans who are
    knowledgeable - just as there are in every city/town/area I've ever
    lived in my life.  
    
    Of all the places I've been - and if you take *big* cities, that's New
    York, Boston, DC and Seattle, I found Boston fans to be the ones who
    over infalte the value of *themselves* and their players the most.
    
    Most of the trades are along the "Marty Barrett and a John Moses Card
    to Chicago for McDowell and Thomas" variety.
    
    Any time an intelligent trade is brought up - especially one that is
    *risky*, i.e. the Sox have to give up a 'prospect'  or a 'name', it is
    quickly shot down.
    
    You'll never get 100% agreement - no kidding!  You got the patent on
    that thought?   You seem to have a kneejerk reaction to defending the
    Sox and Boston whenever a criticism is brought forward.
    
    As I"ve always said "fans are fans are fans - doesn't matter where you
    are."
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.201 | Not a Bostoner, but still think they take a bad rap... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 30 1991 17:04 | 13 | 
|  |     
    > You seem to have a kneejerk reaction to defending the
    > Sox and Boston whenever a criticism is brought forward.
      
    Which would be ironic because I'm not from Boston or New England
    originally, absolutely despised the Red Sox until around 1983-84,
    and am not much of a fan of any of the other Boston teams.  I guess
    your opinion of Boston fans comes from closer to the perspective of
    an original insider, and mine as an outsider.  Funny that we perceive
    the same things so differently, and from the opposite inclination...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.202 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Will the Pernicious Gits Repeat? | Fri Aug 30 1991 18:37 | 27 | 
|  |     Glenn -
    
    But I'm not an original Bostoner nor New Englander.  Maybe because I
    went to school in Boston with a vast majority of New Englanders, all
    Boston fans, that have the views that I do.  
    
    Sox fans are a strange bunch.  The Sox are a frustrating team.
    
    I still think they need to scrap 'oldthink' - since it hasn't gotten
    them a title in years, and turn it around.  Maybe a St. Louis Cardinal
    Northeast is what is needed.  Would drive the fans nuts, but if they
    won, they'd love 'em.
    
    Of course, the Sox problems start with ownership - upper management has
    been a joke, and will continue to be one.  They always seem to be on
    the edge of a diving board - but afraid to dive in and get wet -
    because they want assurances that the water is perfect, that they have
    a towell to dry off with, etc.  Even when they make moves - like the
    free agent signing this winter, they seem paralized with fear to make a
    trade.  
    
    As for taking a bad rap - bostoner's take no worse a bad rap than folks
    from Detroit do, or New York, or Miami.  In fact, IMO, they get off
    easier.  Nationally, Boston's problems (busing notwithstanding), are
    kept fairly local, compared to other large cities.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.203 | Glenn's right JD.  Surrender now and save face. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Tue Sep 03 1991 11:19 | 2 | 
|  |     
    
 | 
| 3.204 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:29 | 6 | 
|  |     Went to see the Braves in Atlanta one week ago today. The night they
    climbed into a 1st place tie. Only 16,000 fans in the stands. What a
    disgrace!
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.205 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:47 | 4 | 
|  |     	Yeah but Rich, I think that was the night they had to go head
    to head with the midget car racing finals or something.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.206 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:57 | 18 | 
|  |     Kinda sad, really. They've got this kinda neat stadium that they will
    tear down in'96, an exciting baseball team that only sells out on
    weekends and Georgia Bulldog bumper stickers on most cars. I guess the
    priorities I am used to don't apply there.
    
    Could not believe it only cost $3.00 to park at Atlanta-Fulton County.
    The wife and kids met and shook hands with Homer the Brave. Bought
    tomahawks for the kids. 
    
    Nice to see so many ex-Richmond Braves on the big league roster. Brian
    Hunter, Keith Mitchell, Armando Reynoso and Mark Wohlers were all with
    the R-Braves in June/July. Then, it was nice to see other players I've
    seen in Richmond such as Treadway, Blauser, and Olson. However, the
    R-Braves have been picked clean. Worst record in the IL this year. Poor
    Phil Niekro had little left by the middle of August.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.207 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBalls | Wed Sep 04 1991 17:05 | 7 | 
|  |     	Sounds to good to be true Rich.  First you ain't got to deal
    with DockerWearin', VolvoDrivin', PerrierDrinkin', BrieEatin' 
    IzodShirtWearin' yuppie eventgoers.  AND, you get to see real baseball
    not pseudo-softball like you get in the Almost League with lead-footed
    fatsos tryin' to hit homeruns every time at bat.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.208 |  | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Sep 04 1991 20:13 | 6 | 
|  |     Doesn't Turner show all the Braves games on TV?  That may have
    something to do with low attendance at the games, plus the fact that
    Fulton County Stadium is downtown and the perimeter and interstate
    system is gridlock from 4pm till 7pm.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
 | 
| 3.209 | Stadium better than the fans in it | SHALOT::MEDVID | inbuilt guilt catches up with you | Thu Sep 05 1991 09:28 | 11 | 
|  |     Fulton County Stadium has relatively easy access.  It is one of the
    nicest stadiums I've been in.  To tear it down and build another
    abomination (a.k.a. a dome) is a crime.
    
    And if you don't think that the majority of that crowd are yuppies,
    you're dead wrong.  They, like the Minissotans, have come out on the
    bandwagon and asking friends for good baseball books to read.  This
    after years of not so much as taking a passing glance at FCS during the
    summer months as they passed by in their BMWs.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.210 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Lithuania is free again! | Thu Sep 05 1991 09:31 | 7 | 
|  |     re .208:
    
    About 130 of the Braves' 162 games are shown on WTBS; the remaining
    games are shown on the SportSouth cable channel.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.211 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Sep 05 1991 10:56 | 30 | 
|  |     o Most Braves home games are on WTBS
    
    o Home games start at 7:40. Traffic on I-75/I-85 not gridlock after 6
    
    o Saw lots of Dockers in the stands and Jags in the parking lot
    
    o The "Chop/Chop" thing is really dependant on the organists whims
    
    o Atlanta Fulton County stadium is CLEAN and easy to get to.
    
    
    The decision was made, while I was there, to defintely tear the
    currenty stadium down. Olympic Stadium will be built, within the next
    few years, in the current parking lot adjacent to AFC stadium. The
    current stadium will be used for some events in 1996 and then it will
    be torn down. The Braves will then play in the new Olympic Stadium
    which will be modified somewhat. 
    
    The Georgia Dome and Olympic Stadium are not the same thing as I
    understand it. The Falcons will play in the Dome as will, most likely
    Georgia Tech.
    
    Of all the inner city stadiums I have been to, Atlanta Fulton County is
    the easiest to reach. Parking is ample and affordable. I guess the only
    thing I don't like about it (and this is based on my Fenway/Wrigley
    bias) is that if you put plastic grass down, it would look almost just
    like Bush Stadium. The place has no character.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.212 |  | 29633::JCOTANCH |  | Thu Sep 05 1991 11:13 | 10 | 
|  |     Another dome in pro football....a tragedy to the game.
    
    Yet another reason college football rools, the very low percentage of
    dome teams.  Houston, Syracuse, and Minnesota are the only ones that
    come to mind.
    
    Atlanta will make 7 dome teams out of 30 (after expansion), nearly a
    quarter of the league.  :^(
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.213 | ACC Chris witnesses baseball history! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:21 | 7 | 
|  |     Broke into my daughters piggy bank yesterday so's I could head down to
    the (chop! chop!) Braves game last night.  (chop! chop!)  I was justly 
    rewarded, (chop! chop!) what with three (3) Atlanta hurlers (chop!
    chop!) tossing the first combined no-hitter in NL history! (chop!!!)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.214 | Was it an error or wasn't it? | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:51 | 0 | 
| 3.215 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | he starts to shake & cough | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:00 | 6 | 
|  |     It looked like an infield hit to me.  You were there, Chris, so let us
    hear your point of view...and be objective.
    
    Why did they pull the starter if he was throwing a no hitter anyway?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.216 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:12 | 5 | 
|  | �    Why did they pull the starter if he was throwing a no hitter anyway?
    
    Probably because he was due up the next inning.  Noone wants to see a
    guy who gets a couple of whiffs, I mean swings, of a bat every 5 days
    in a 1 run ball game.
 | 
| 3.217 | Error in my book... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | BrowardCountyPimpService,erPolice | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:14 | 8 | 
|  |     I flet it wa an error.  In fact, its that type of 'hit' that is many
    times called a hit that pees me off about official scoring.  Pendleton
    had it the whole way, but I think he saw Belliard out of the corner of
    his eye and misplayed the ball.  Error in my book.  And the decision by
    the official scorer was quick - and he said he would have scored it an
    error if it was the first batter of the game, FWIW.
    
    jD
 | 
| 3.218 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:21 | 9 | 
|  |     re Taking ther starter out
    
    Merckur (sp?) has been a reliever nearly his whole career. The plan
    when he pitches is to get 5-6 good innings out of him.
    
    Why risk runing the guy for the year? 
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.219 | Everything you wanted to know (and probably more...) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:30 | 28 | 
|  |     re: Why pull Mercker
    
    Rich is right.  He's a relief pitcher whose been called into service
    as a starter because of the Braves complete lack of a 5th man in the
    rotation.  No way was he ready to go 9 innings.
    
    
    re: the error
    
    To be honest, those watching on TV probably have a much better
    perspective on this than I do.  I was sitting out in the left field
    stands - not exactly right on top of the play!
    
    From the replays I've seen though as well as the comments made by the
    official scorer, I agree with JD.  The official reason he gave the
    error to Pendleton was because he started for the ball and then
    stopped.  This can be grounds for an error.  Earlier this year the
    same scorekeeper got a kudo from Sports Illustrated cause he gave an
    error to an outfielder who called for a short pop but then let it drop
    untouched cause of a communication breakdown with his shortstop.
    
    (BTW, the reason Pendleton stopped going for the ball is cause he lost
    it in the lights ...)
    
    Great game.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.220 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:42 | 7 | 
|  |     When the no hitter was being reported on during the Sox broadcast last
    night they said that the no-no had been broken up by an IF hit.  They
    later reported that the ruling was changed and an error was given on
    the play.  Is this true?
    
    Most of the high choppers I've seen have been awarded IF hits since the
    scorer usually decides that the runner would have beat it out any way.
 | 
| 3.221 | Whoever reported it was a hit was wrong. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:51 | 9 | 
|  |     That reports was completely wrong Mac.  The scorer *IMMEDIATELY* ruled
    the play an error.  There was no hesitation, and there certainly was no
    changed call.
    
    In the paper this morning the scorer said he was so confident of his
    call that he didn't even bother to look at the replay.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.222 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Thu Sep 12 1991 11:47 | 4 | 
|  |     	'Twas a "Baltimore Chop" hit all the way.  What a homer (not
    Simpson) call.  One that should make a DeanDisciple proud.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.223 | Hit | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Sep 12 1991 12:49 | 17 | 
|  |     
    Based on current, consistent (same standard as if there's not a
    no-hitter) official scoring practice, it's a hit all the way. 
    The ball was chopped very high, and Pendleton would have had to make 
    an exceptional play to even have a chance at throwing Jackson out, if
    he even had that much chance.  That's a hit 100% of the time if there's
    not a no-hitter going.
    
    And either way, of course the official scorer is going to make the
    error decision quickly and then back it up later.  I mean, if he rules
    a hit, he better be ready to flee the stadium being chased by 30,000
    tomahawk-wielding Braves fans.  When you're at the game like that,
    you're not going to be as objective as when you're at home watching on
    TV with the benefit of replay.  I wouldn't be, either.
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.224 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Sep 12 1991 12:55 | 7 | 
|  |     Somewhere (notes, papers, ?) I read a suggestion that MLB add another
    umpire to each crew.  The extra umpire would serve as the official
    scorer.  Umps would rotate as they do now so that each member of the
    crew would have a turn in the field, behind the plate, and as the
    scorer.  It was suggested that this would provide consistency and help
    eliminate bias in the scoring.  It would also help get the good umps
    promoted from the minors.
 | 
| 3.225 | <sniff> | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Andy in Atlanta | Mon Sep 16 1991 17:29 | 16 | 
|  |     Bad new for Braves fans -- Otis Nixon, league leader in stolen bases
    and lead off batter for the Braves starting line-up, has been suspended 
    for apparently failing a drug test.  No further details (ie. what the
    suspected drug is, etc.).
    
    What is curious (to me, maybe others will know better) is that drug
    tests are not mandated for Major League baseball players ('least that's
    what I understand).  Rather, they are given if volunteered or if a
    problem is obvious.  Certainly I don't know first hand Otis' case but
    it didn't -appear- he had a problem.  So, perhaps he approached someone
    regarding the issue.  I dunno... 
    
    Suspension is for 60-days which will extend the remainder of the
    regular season, the playoffs, and into next season (beginning today).
    
    -Andy
 | 
| 3.226 | shock.. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Did Gail finish? We want to KNOW! | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:03 | 4 | 
|  |     Yowaza -  That might really hurt the Braves.  Who takes over left =--
    Lonnie SMith??
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.227 |  | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Andy in Atlanta | Mon Sep 16 1991 19:47 | 18 | 
|  |     In retrospect, Otis underwent drug rehab while playing for the
    Cleveland Indians (I believe) and may still be under some kinda drug
    rehab program.  If this is the case, it -is- possible he was submitted
    to a random drug test.  In fact, thinking back, it might have been
    about last Wednesday/Thursday -- I think he missed a home game against
    the Padres (no explanation given that I know of).  
    Rumors were flying about earlier on the 6:00 news as to if he can
    appeal or not -- one station said he might be able, another says
    definitely not.  Personally, I think he won't be able to but I'm no
    expert.
    Who'll take his place?  I don't think that's been ironed out yet but
    whoever it is definitely won't be as quick as Otis.
    Keep on choppin'...
    -Andy
 | 
| 3.228 | For you Braves fans out there... | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Andy in Atlanta | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:35 | 14 | 
|  | - Cincinatti & Atlanta were rained out last night.  Will play a double header
  this afternoon (if the rain lets up).  Dodgers won last night (boo, hiss)
  which puts them up by 2 games.
- Deon Sanders was reactivated as a Brave (currently using Otis' locker).  He
  is expected to be used, at least, as pinch-runner.  Maybe more...  He -will-
  be playing for the Falcons this Sunday against the Saints.  This is the
  only time (that I know of) that a pro athelete has been activated to play 
  two different sports for two different teams at the same time (and in the
  same stadium, no less!).
- Keith Mitchell was arrested last night on DUI charges.
-Andy
 | 
| 3.229 |  | HELIX::TORRES | Wheel In The Sky Keeps On Turning... | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:41 | 12 | 
|  |     
    	What do you guys think of the trade between the Braves and Cubs? I
    think it is a little too late for a trade, specially for a pitcher that
    might not get a start and will be inelegible for post season...  The
    catcher might be of help...  Wasn't the catcher (can't remember his
    name) highly touted once...
    
    	If the Braves don't make it, it will not be for lack of desire...
    
    	Go Braves!
    
    LT
 | 
| 3.230 | like it | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Dial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463 | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:43 | 12 | 
|  |     Good trade, I think.  Shows they want to win this year.  Bilecki might
    be a help from the bullpen - which has been hurting the Braves lately.
    
    
    Berryhill can spell Olsen for a game this week. He needs it.
    
    As for next year.  Bilecki can be the 5th starter, and Berryhill either
    the starter or platoon with Olsen.
    
    I like it.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.231 | traded who? | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:14 | 3 | 
|  |     So just what was the trade... I still haven't seen all the players.
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.232 | I'd have liked it better were it 2 weeks ago | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:49 | 10 | 
|  |     Trade was Berryhill and Bielecki for two prospects, can't remember who.
    
    Like the trade, but wonder if it's too little too late as far as this
    year goes.  Olson has been slumping in September, probably due to
    overuse, and the Braves sure could have used another arm yesterday with
    Pena unavailable.  (Have to wonder if Wohlers just plain not having it
    yesterday was also a result of being used often lately.)
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.233 | btw, what's up with the BASEBALL notesfile? | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:50 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.234 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 30 1991 15:24 | 4 | 
|  | �                -< btw, what's up with the BASEBALL notesfile? >-
    
    According to Mike Corbett, the moderator, HECKLE is down and expected
    up sometime today or tomorrow.
 | 
| 3.235 | thanks Mac | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Mon Sep 30 1991 16:03 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.236 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Tue Oct 01 1991 08:23 | 8 | 
|  | 
RE: Baseball notesfile
	Hope to have it up later this afternoon.  
Tex
 | 
| 3.237 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAH | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:56 | 15 | 
|  | 	Well it looks like Bill White decided to reverse his suspension of 
the Nastiest Boy because it was in the "best interests of the pennant race". 
BullCookies!  It was in the best interest of the Los Angeles Dodgers!  Now 
while the blue crew are the benefactors of this decision I'm not sure that 
they originated it.  White did this because the fellows at CBS aren't to 
pleased with Minnesota and Toronto being in the ALCS and PittsburgH being one 
of the participants in the NLCS.  Nothing against the teams but the 
television markets are small and while the Braves have the potential to 
capture America's immagination like the '69 Mets did the backroom decision 
makers at CBS would rather a solid TV market team like the Dodgers be the 
other team in the NLCS.  This was a network decision that was pushed on 
baseball.  I never thought Bill White would prostitute himself like this.
				/Don
 | 
| 3.238 | Who's playing where when? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Talk slowly; I'm hard of thinking | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:59 | 4 | 
|  |     
    Anyone know the schedule for the NLCS and World Series?
    
    
 | 
| 3.239 | Bizarre leadership from White, to say the least... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:19 | 15 | 
|  |     
    Bill White has made some of strangest decisions this year I've ever
    seen.  Stuff like limited or *no* suspensions for obvious beanballs and
    large brawls, a fine but no suspension for Rob Dibble throwing at a
    baserunner "because he's been punished enough", an unprecedended *7*
    game suspension for Norm Charlton because he had the nerve to admit to
    an obvious beanball (hypocrisy at its worst from White), and now the
    startling conclusion that games involving the Reds in September *really
    are* more important than games involving the Reds in June, even though
    the rules don't change according to schedule (and even though the Reds 
    are out of it now!)
    
    glenn
     
    
 | 
| 3.240 | The whole world bleeds Dodger Blue, right? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:40 | 10 | 
|  |     Boy /Don, that note looked almost cynical enough to be one_a mine!  (Or
    even MorT's ...)
    
    No doubt you're right - the boys at CBS are pulling for the Dodgers
    big-time.  Wonder if White was on the line to Roger Craig the other
    night, instructing him to leave Righetti in while he was serving nothing 
    but BP to the Dodgers ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.241 | Hrumph... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Is Paris Burning? | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:43 | 18 | 
|  |     Ha.  Big deal.  I've felt that baseball's 'rulers' have been full of
    doo-doo for years.  the phrase "The Integrity of the Game" makes me
    laugh whenever I hear it.  It was at its worst under that pompous ass
    Bart Giamatti, and the league presidents and the commish are full of
    it.
    
    How come Don ZImmer hasn't been crucified in public yet?  How come Don
    Zimmer hasn't been proven guilty before due process - like a certain
    ex-Cincy Red was?
    
    Why this move by White?
    
    Baseball is hurting on TV, that's why.  CBS has lost millions on the
    contract, and caint stand the prospect of a Pittsburgh-Toronto world
    series.  They'll go nuts.  The want L.A. and Tommy Pasta and Darryl
    Burrberry and Mike Sciatia there.  
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.242 |  | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:49 | 11 | 
|  | If an investigative reporter, like the kind that prowls around Capitol Hill
ever got the key to Baseball's Closet, so many skeletons would fall it
it would like like a biology lab on "Put the Cat Skeleton Together Day".
There'd be so much dirt in there that MLB would be forced to induct
Shoeless Joe into the HoF post haste.
Can you say Hypocrites?  Sure, I knew you could.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.243 | It's now ba$eball | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:22 | 9 | 
|  | The ultimate ruler of MLB, like all sports is not Bill White, Faye Vincent or
Bart Giamatti's ghost, but the almighty $.  i don't beleive this was always the
case, Judge Landis took no s*it from anyone, he was simply a hateful and 
predudice man.
The past several years, money has made the baseball go round.  I even question
the outcome of the playoffs and series.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.244 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:30 | 5 | 
|  |     There is some kind of discombobulated logic to this whole thing.  The
    original offense was committed against the Dodgers.  To suspend the guy
    now with the Reds playing the Braves could be viewed as penalizing the
    Dodgers.  Then again, you'd have to subscribe to the theory that
    September/October games are worth more than June games...
 | 
| 3.245 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Tue Oct 01 1991 14:14 | 24 | 
|  |     
    	White put three days of Charlton's suspension on hold 
    	until after the three game series with the Braves.
    
    From the local rag:
    
    	"With the close pennant race in the Western Division, it	
    	is imperative that all teams play with their full complement
    	of players in order to guarantee that the competition is 
    	fair and balanced," White said.
    
    	White handed down the suspension one week after the incident
    	at the beginning of a 2 game series with LA.  Charlton
    	appealed, putting the suspension on hold.  He dropped the 
    	appeal Sunday with one week left in the season so it would
    	not carry over to next season.
    
    	"I don't really understand it," Charlton said.  "There's
    	this thing called the integrity of the game that Pete
    	Rose got kicked out for.  They said Pete Rose might ruin the
    	integrity of the game.  Yet Bill White suspends me against
    	LA.  I drop the appeal, and he make me play against Atlanta."
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.246 | Did White ever play left field ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Wed Oct 02 1991 09:43 | 20 | 
|  |  This Bill White-Norm Charlton thing is truly bizarre.    
 
 Not only does White concede, through his decision, that late season
 games are more important than early or mid-season games.    Not only
 does he directly influence the pennant race in favor of the Dodgers.
 
 But he also jeopardizes the Reds' chances for *NEXT* season.  
 Charlton was suspended for 7 games for admitting that he threw at
 Mike Scoscia and now that White has allowed him to play these three
 Braves games, Charlton will not be able to finish his suspension this
 year.
 
 He'll have to sit out two games of the 1992 season.   White better
 hope the Reds either win the division or lose it by more than 2 games
 because if they lose it by 1 or 2 games, they have every reason to be
 damn angry.
 
 White is doing 'shrooms big time.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.247 | 8^) | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Wed Oct 02 1991 09:52 | 5 | 
|  | > White is doing 'shrooms big time.
 
Just so the record is clear on this, he *didn't* get them from me!
'Saw
 | 
| 3.248 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:56 | 21 | 
|  |     
    Bob,
    
    	Let me qualify this by stating that I am a big Reds
    	fan.  Now that we've established that........
    
    	I think Charlton timed this whole thing on purpose.
    	He immediately appealed in time to face the Dodgers.
    	He then gave up the appeal in time to not face the
    	Braves.
    
    	It's common knowledge he HATES the Dodgers (Charlton	
    	that is).
    
    	This is, of course, my opinion.  
    
    	I just might be searching for a new team after all the 
    	bush antics the Reds have been pulling.  Hey!  Isn't
    	Denver getting a team? ;^)
    
    	Claybroon
 | 
| 3.249 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 02 1991 14:15 | 17 | 
|  |     Excellent point, Bob-man.  
    
    The Braves pulled off a most-improbable "W" over the Reds lasted night. 
    Down 6-zip after 1 inning, the Reds have Rijo on the mound, ... and
    they pull off the 7-6 win.  Unreal.  
    
    
    re: Wade
    
    I'm a Reds fan too and you very well may be right, but the theory is
    sheer conjecture and certainly could not be used by White to base his
    decision.  Charlton says he wants to get his suspension
    outa the way so he'd be ready for next year, and that's perfectly
    reasonable explanation.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.250 | Dodgers don't need White's helping hand | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:00 | 14 | 
|  |  And two of the Braves runs came off Charlton so perhaps "Justice" is
 being served after all.
 
 Regardless, that still doesn't relieve White from a bonehaid
 decision.  And, furthermore, consider this ...
 
 Bill White based his decision to suspend Charlton's suspension for
 the Braves series because he said he wanted to make sure the pennant
 race competition was as fair as possible and that all the teams
 involved had all their players at hand.
 
 Wonder what Otis Nixon thought of that ???
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.251 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:21 | 7 | 
|  | � Bill White based his decision to suspend Charlton's suspension for
� the Braves series because he said he wanted to make sure the pennant
� race competition was as fair as possible and that all the teams
� involved had all their players at hand.
    
    Using this logic, Roger Clemens should never have been tossed out of
    that ALCS game last year.
 | 
| 3.252 | League suspected Nixon, then nails him in pennant race :^( | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:40 | 21 | 
|  |     re: Otis Nixon
    
    The timing of the Nixon suspension definitely feeds my cynical
    appetite.  Consider that he apparently tested positive way back in
    July, but for some reason or other the league never notified the
    Braves or Nixon.  Apparently there was some question as to the validity
    of his showing up positive (to Cocaine).  Then in the heart of a fierce
    pennant race he gets retested and (surprise!) turns up positive.  What
    a shock it musta been to the league, huh?
    
    I realize it's tough to have sympathy for Otis given that he's
    admitted his guilt, but consider that since his initial coke problem
    in 1987 he's been tested over **TWO HUNDRED** (200) times!  *If* the
    league had noticed the Braves of the questionable test back in July
    there's a halfway decent chance he woulda stayed clean at least through
    the rest of the season.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
 | 
| 3.253 | Naw, no conspiracy here, but maybe an attempted cover-up | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:14 | 20 | 
|  | 
    > *If* the
    > league had noticed the Braves of the questionable test back in July
    > there's a halfway decent chance he woulda stayed clean at least through
    > the rest of the season.                                     
    
    If I'm not mistaken, the Braves and Nixon were fully aware of his 
    marginal positive test.  It would have been kind of hard for them not 
    to be, since Nixon flew to New York to meet with the commissioner to 
    discuss the problem.  ;-)
    
    I don't think the Braves really have a beef on the Nixon suspension. 
    If anything, Vincent let him slide in the "best interests of baseball",
    which can most succinctly be expressed as "whatever keeps our good name
    out of the mud".  The rest of the league could make the argument that
    Vincent was obligated to suspend Nixon the first time, as he was
    technically in violation of his aftercare treatment agreement.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.254 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:31 | 9 | 
|  |     re: .-1
    
    According to the Braves GM, John Scherhoff (sp), he was never notified
    of the failed drug test.  I believe Nixon had to go to NY because of
    his run-in with a Phillies pitcher who beaned him.  (Otis went after
    him wif his bat.)
    
    
    Chris
 | 
| 3.255 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:41 | 13 | 
|  |                                                  
    > According to the Braves GM, John Scherhoff (sp), he was never notified
    > of the failed drug test.  I believe Nixon had to go to NY because of
    > his run-in with a Phillies pitcher who beaned him.  (Otis went after
    > him wif his bat.)
    
    Okay, that sounds reasonable.  But Nixon definitely knew of the test, 
    and he still stuck his nose back in the bag.  And even if he hadn't 
    known, he still had to know that he was acting in violation of league
    policy and susceptible at any time to getting caught.  No excuses...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.256 | Maybe yes, maybe no. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:53 | 8 | 
|  |     > No excuses
    
    As I said, difficult to argue with this, but I'll always be curious if
    Nixon played for, say, the LA Dodgers, if the same events would've
    transpired ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.257 | **OFFICIAL NLCS NOTE** | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 19:52 | 4 | 
|  |     This'll be the official note to discuss the NLCS!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.258 |  | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Queen city will be his last stand! | Wed Oct 02 1991 21:57 | 8 | 
|  |     
    	Are we making predictions? If so, I'll take the Dodgers to go with
    the Pirates.
    
    	Go big Blue!
    
    B.A._if_not_then_delete_this_note_
    
 | 
| 3.259 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:36 | 2 | 
|  |     Since we already have a topic to discuss the National League, I see no
    reason why the NLCS can't be discussed here.
 | 
| 3.260 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doc Flutie? | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:40 | 6 | 
|  | 	I was listening to Sports on W-eee-eee-I this morning and they had 
one of the Dodger players whining about how the Reds laid down for the 
Braves because they were pulling for Atlanta to beat Los Angeles.  What a 
pathetic bunch of crybabies.  All the more reason to root for my Braves!
		/Don(making tomohawk motions as I type this)
 | 
| 3.261 |  | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Reggie Dupard? | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:46 | 3 | 
|  |     Uh-oh... when does Farley call him a dirty name again?
    
    Dodgers bleed weenie blue...
 | 
| 3.262 | Terrific pennant race ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:46 | 16 | 
|  |     re: .-1
    
    Boo hoo!1  Those poor Dodgers ...  BOO HOO!!!!!!! 
    
    Blah.  Guess they forgot about the fact that the same Reds "layed down"
    for the Dodgers a week or two ago, getting swept in LA!
    
    Anyway, after ONE HUNDERED AND FIFTY-NINE (159) games, the Dodgers
    and Braves are in a dead heat.  Advantage has to go to Atlanta right
    now, with three (3) home games against the Astros, while LA travels to
    San Francisco to face a mean Giants team.
    
    Chop!  Chop!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.263 | Spoken words are fleeting, written ones are proof!!!! | CST17::FARLEY | The Man with 1,000 ID's | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:59 | 20 | 
|  | SEE?????  Just like I been sayin.....
    
    
    Most excellent, wise, thoughtful and profound bit of fair-handed
    
    moderator authority *I've* ever seen!   WAY TO GO! your exalted
    
    moderatorness!!!!!!
    ;^)
    
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.259               The National League (Baseball)               259 of 262
CHIEFF::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll"                       2 lines   3-OCT-1991 10:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Since we already have a topic to discuss the National League, I see no
    reason why the NLCS can't be discussed here.
 | 
| 3.264 | CONME BACK!! PLEASE?????? | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:17 | 5 | 
|  | 
Bring the Braves back to Boston where they belong!!!!!!!!!
For cripes sake!
8^)
 | 
| 3.265 | Can they keep it going ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:18 | 17 | 
|  |  Yes, the Braves do have the advantage of playing the lasted three at home
 against lasted-place Houston while the Dodgers have to visit the Stick,
 the traditional house of horrors.
 
 But the Braves also have the pressure of trying to build on a current
 six-game win streak.  It's very very hard to win 9 major league baseball
 games in a row.
 
 If the Braves do win 9 in a row to end the season, they deserve the flag.  
 If the Dodgers sweep the Giants and the Braves then win their 10th in a
 row in Game 163 in LA, then the Braves deserve a parade down Peachtree
 Street.
 
 Must be a new feeling for you, Soup.  You know, rooting for an
 overachieving gotta-love-'em underdog.   Keep up the good work.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.266 |  | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:28 | 10 | 
|  | I'd like to see the Braves do it, if only for the fact that it's someone
DIFFERENT.
I love underdogs.  Underdogs are the American Way of Life.  Overcoming
tremendous odds to win everything...  It's an orgiastic feeling that
pervades the heart of every American....
jmho,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.267 | And I like Sid Coffee and Bream | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | In Harm's Way | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:36 | 8 | 
|  |     The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    strutting their chests.
    
    However, I'd like to see 'em win only because I caints stand Tommy
    Pasta or Darryl Burrberry.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.268 |  | FDCV07::KING | Can't think of anything clever....... | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:37 | 4 | 
|  |     Who really gives a sh*t who wins the west... The "winner" will lose
    4 straight to the Pirates anyway....
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.269 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:19 | 2 | 
|  |     Rick, that's what everyone said about the As last year too.
                                      Denny
 | 
| 3.270 | Pirates over hated Dodgers would be nice, too... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:54 | 15 | 
|  | 
    > The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    > new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    > strutting their chests.
    
    This is what I was saying, in favor of the Dodgers, until Tommy Lasorda 
    emerged as a first-rate crybaby down the stretch.  Now I can't think of 
    anything sweeter than the Giants (who I prefer to either team) sticking 
    it to their hated rivals this weekend in Candlestick. 
    
    Still, the Buccos are the only ones left to really hold my interest in 
    the postseason...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.271 |  | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Reggie Dupard? | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:25 | 4 | 
|  |     Yeah, but JD, how can you not root for a city that has radio stations
    giving away tix when the listeners hear a slurping sound and call in
    to say "Tommy Lasorda sucks Slim-Fast"?
    
 | 
| 3.272 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:40 | 14 | 
|  |     > The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    > new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    > strutting their chests.
    
    Perhaps, but for every such wagon hopper there's a fan like the author
    of .229 (who I remember from the old Braves' notesfile), who's stood by
    the Braves through what were frankly some rotten seasons in the
    mid/late 80s. For those people, you can't help but be happy.
    
    And Glenn Geiger, wherever he may be right now, is surely smilng too.
    
    
    py
                                                               
 | 
| 3.273 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | In Harm's Way | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:49 | 11 | 
|  |     Pau. Walt, et al -
    
    Hey, I know that.  Heck, I want the Braves to do it just cuz they kinda
    remind me of the 69 Mets.  I was just making a cut at Soup, who I don't
    remember showing any interest in baseball over the last years.
    
    And yes, I'm sure Glenn Geiger is smiling, wherever he is.  I met him
    in CXO, and he was a super guy.  And heck, Paul, Glenn and I had by far
    the worst DNR teams ;-)
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.274 | 2 kids, no money. Definitely not a yuppie. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 03 1991 13:55 | 11 | 
|  |     No interest in America's Pastime, JD????  Where were *you* when I
    boldly predicted a Cincinnati 'W' in the playoffs (after Nazzaro's 
    pre-playoff statement that he thought the Pirates would give the A's a
    nice battle) as well as a Cincinnati 'W' in the WS???
    
    I WILL confess to being a Braves bandwagon jumper.  No way around that. 
    But if you saw the car I was drivin', you'd drop that 'yuppie' label
    but_quick.  :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.275 | Are T and Crisp the same person? | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:15 | 1 | 
|  |     ACChis is to baseball as MrT is to hockey.
 | 
| 3.276 |  | CAM::WAY | Jack Daniels and RedMan - SOME good | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:34 | 6 | 
|  | JD,
If all you had to root for was a team that wore the prettiest shade
of baby blue, and who achieve excellence during the recruiting season
and regular season, but then who continually choked on Beechnut Strained
Peas in the Big Dance, wouldn't YOU jump on a bandwagon too?  8^)
 | 
| 3.277 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:46 | 17 | 
|  |     I think that the Bucs will beat hooever they play from the west, BUT,
    and that's a huge plate-stacker style BUT, I hope they don't go to
    sleep the way they did lasted year .vs. the Reds.
    
    Drabek has been scheduled to start the NLCS opener nexted wednesday.
    
    Hopefully, Bonds won't go 0 fer NLCS the way he did lasted year, too.
    What got me was he blasted Jeff King for not playing but he suyre
    didn't do anything to prove that he was on the field, either.
    
    Bonds made a pretty big turnaround this year, though, I must admit.
    After batting about .190 thru the end of May, he has played good ever
    since.  
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.278 | T and Soup vastly different on this score | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:48 | 23 | 
|  |  Yeah, but Soup's bandwagon ride is a little easier to swallow than
 T's illegitmate ride on the North Stars chariot.
 
 I mean the No Stars got into the NHL's worthless playoff system with
 a losing record, fer cripes sake.   And it took an upset win or two
 or three or more before T decided he'd "discovered" ice hockey.   Did
 we hear any manly admissions about how losing teams didn't deserve a
 shot at the Cup ???   Oh, no, all we heard was "miracle this" and "on
 a roll that" and so on and so forth ???   You'd have thought the
 sport was invented in Minnesota, fer cryin' out loud.
 
 At least Soup hopped on the wagon of a team that has to truly earn
 its post-season berth.
 
 But he did succumb to the Tomahawk Chop silliness so he's not
 completely blameless in all this.   He needs to step forward *now*
 and denounce the Chop as an over-hyped media symbol of a one-time
 only bandwagon filled to overflowing with sunshine warriors.   Not
 only that ... he should reject the clearly racist implications behind
 the unfortunate gesture.    Factual intellectual honesty demands that
 he do this *NOW* !!!
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.279 | Chop!  Chop!  Chop!  Chop!! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 03 1991 15:03 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.280 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Thu Oct 03 1991 16:26 | 18 | 
|  | 			    ACC Heelbilly
	(sung to the theme song from the Beverley Hillbillies)
	Come and listen to my story 'bout a man named Cyst,
	A poor Tar Heel fan makin' tommy chops wif' his fist.
	And then one day he started rootin' for the Braves,
	When the good folks of SPORTS started callin him a knave.
	Yuppie that is.  Bandwagon jumper.
	Well the first thing you know ol' Cyst's a baseball main,
	The SPORTS folks said "Cyst cut out whilst you cain".
	They said "'Snuffy and the Heels are the only team you luv",
	"So take your Excellent Losses outta here or we'll give you a shove".
	Tossed off the bandwagon.  Jilted.
 | 
| 3.281 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Von Ryan's Express | Fri Oct 04 1991 11:19 | 5 | 
|  |     /DON -
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA(TM)
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.282 | From USA TODAY... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Von Ryan's Express | Fri Oct 04 1991 11:25 | 54 | 
|  |     From USA Today:
    
    From the home office in Tijuana, the top 10 reasons why no one outside
    of Los Angeles is rooting for the Dodgers to outlast the Braves on this
    final weekend:
    
    
    
    10.  Atlanta's tomahawk chop is our best hope for getting rid of the
    wave.
    
    
    
    9.  If the Dodgers win, there will be no escaping Tommy LaSorda's
    Slim-fast commercials.
    
    
    
    8.  Jane Fonda needs the TV time, and Ted Turner will see that she gets
    it.
    
    
    
    7. We've gone this long without seeing Eddie Murray smile.  WHy change
    now?
    
    
    
    6.  Some of us still have a grudge about Al  Campanis' theories on
    buoyancy.
    
    
    5.  We used up the last of the smog and sushi jokes during the
    Bulls/Lakers series.
    
    
    
    4.  Atlanta gives you Justice.  LA gives you gas  wiht the pitching duo
    of Orel and Belcher.
    
    
    
    3.  For a town that has never hosted a sporting event of consequence,
    Atlanta could use some practice before the 1996 Olympics.
    
    
    
    2.  In all of sports, is there any phrase that rolls off the tongue
    more easily than "Beat LA"?
    
    
    1. and the Number ONE reason the world is rooting against the
    Dodgers...If the playoffs are in Atlanta, we'll be three time zones
    away from Sonny Bono's Senate Campaign.
 | 
| 3.283 |  | CSC32::SALZER |  | Fri Oct 04 1991 16:29 | 3 | 
|  |     What is the tie breaker for homefield if the season ends tied?
    Coin flip?
    head to head record?
 | 
| 3.284 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 04 1991 16:31 | 5 | 
|  | �    What is the tie breaker for homefield if the season ends tied?
�    Coin flip?
�    head to head record?
    
    A coin flip was held a week or two ago.  I don't recall the result.
 | 
| 3.285 | LA won the coin flip.  :^( | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 04 1991 16:32 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.286 |  | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 04 1991 16:40 | 4 | 
|  | �                        -< LA won the coin flip.  :^( >-
    
    And I'll bet CBS provided Bill White with a 2 headed coin and told
    LaSorda to pick heads, right?
 | 
| 3.287 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Sun Oct 06 1991 17:09 | 2 | 
|  |     The Coin flip didn't matter!!!
    
 | 
| 3.288 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Oct 07 1991 08:28 | 4 | 
|  |        Strawberry says the teams that played da Braves down the stretch
    didn't care about winning. Of course he also said all the teams that
    the Blew played were out to get them.
                                          Denny
 | 
| 3.289 | Strawberry whine | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | This was a season to remember? | Mon Oct 07 1991 09:02 | 10 | 
|  |     re .288:
    
    The same Daaarrryyll who went 1 for 8 in Friday's and Saturday's games.
    
    The Dodgers didn't lose it down the stretch.  They lost it by not
    putting Atlanta away back in July, when the Braves were 9-1/2 back and
    Justice and Bream were just starting DL stints.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.290 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Great Escape | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:27 | 8 | 
|  |     I loved it when Darryl whined.  When he was up in the 9th, man on, down
    by two - I told my wife - Darryl will stike out.  He did.  Somethings
    never change.
    
    Braves were 55-28 after the all-star break - best in baseball.  Folks
    are handing the Pirates the Pennant already.  I don't think so...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.291 | Atlanta has gone wacko ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:41 | 23 | 
|  |     > Folks are handing the Pirates the Pennant already.  I don't think
    > so...
    
    Agreed, JD.  The amazing thing to me is that any Pirates fan could
    actually be confident heading into this series.  Consider:
    
    o Atlanta had the best record in baseball the 2nd half
    o Atlanta won the season series 9-3 against Pittsburgh
    o The Pirates supposedly are susceptible to lefties, and the
      Braves figure to throw a couple of tough ones at them
    
    I'm not so sure Atlanta will win.  The Pirates have an experience edge,
    especially in pitching, which I think is significant.  I also tend to
    minimize the Braves hot play down the stretch, cause of Dean's theory
    about tournaments.  (You build momentum IN the tourney, not prior ...)
    
    But the fact remains that Vegas' making Pittsburgh a prohibitive
    favorite would leave me salivating, assuming I was a gambler.  (Which,
    BTW, I'm not.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
 | 
| 3.292 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | kweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbwe | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:44 | 10 | 
|  |     
    >>o The Pirates supposedly are susceptible to lefties, and the
    >>  Braves figure to throw a couple of tough ones at them
    
    ESPN had a graphic yesterday showing the BUcs had the best record in
    the NL .vs. lefties.    Something like 34-16 against left handed
    starters.  Is that being susceptible??????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.293 | Real (unsupportive) fans vs. Yuppie Tomahawkers | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:53 | 26 | 
|  |     As a Pirates fan, the Braves certainly scare me.  But I'd much rather
    be playing them than the Dodgers.  A few points:
    
    - The Bucs do have an experience edge, but two of 90's Pirates,
    Belliard and Bream, are now playing for Atlanta.  And Terry Pendleton
    adds lots of post-season play experience and leadership.
    
    - Bream will be cheered in Pittsburgh again.  Belliard will be booed.
    
    - The Pittsburgh weather might play a factor.  It's getting cold up
    there.
    
    - One, two, or all three of the Pittsburgh outfielders will be too hot
    to touch.  My guess is Bonilla.  VanSlyke will struggle against the
    lefties; perhaps unstoppable against the righties.
    
    - The Braves might be living high right now and celebrating winning the
    division a bit too much.  They might have a bad attitude of, "Well,
    even if we lose the playoffs, we had a great season."  The Pirates are,
    on the other hand, looking to avenge their horrid October 1990.
    
    - I just think it would be great for Pittsburgh to beat the Minessotta
    Yuppies twice in one year in two major sports.  They have to get past
    the Atlanta Volvos first.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.294 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:53 | 6 | 
|  |     Interesting, Jake.  I forget where I heard the lefty thing ...
    
    Haven't read the paper today, but I'd guess the Braves 3-man rotation
    will be either Glavine-Smoltz-Avery, or Glavine-Avery-Smoltz.  Anybody
    hear?  Also, who do the Pirates figure to being throwing ...
    
 | 
| 3.295 | more... | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:08 | 18 | 
|  | >Also, who do the Pirates figure to being throwing ...
    
    I would think the Pirates rotation will be
    
    	Drabek
    	Smiley
    	Smith
    
    That would put Tomlin in the bullpen for strong middle relief...if
    needed.
    
    And I'll go out on a limb here for the hell of it:
    
    	Pirates win pennant in five games, Garry Redus MVP
    
    How's that for brash?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.296 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:10 | 2 | 
|  |        What I wanna know is: are the Bucs as unstoppable as the '90 As?
                                          Denny
 | 
| 3.297 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:15 | 4 | 
|  |     If the Braves and Twins can go from worst to first in one year, nothing
    says the Rockies can't win the NL West in '93.  :^)
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.298 | Coming from a Dodger fan. | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Tired of it. | Mon Oct 07 1991 12:07 | 1 | 
|  |     Congrats to da Braves. I hope they kick PIttsburgh's ass.
 | 
| 3.299 | /Chop.../Chop.../Chop.../Chop...  Braves in 7. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Mon Oct 07 1991 12:29 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.300 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | kweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbwe | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:06 | 8 | 
|  |     The Tomahawk Chop is not an Atlanta original, they stole it from
    
    PeeWee Herman's Florida Theater motion!!!
    
    (8^)*    (8^0*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.301 | inbreeding --> green-teef | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | From MattSewell to MikeSewell | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:24 | 5 | 
|  |     Hey, you guys see the picture of that Braves fan in today's USA 
    Today?  Sorta reminds me of that guy in David Lynch's "Wild At
    Heart."  Haa.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.302 | controversial kinda guy | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:34 | 8 | 
|  | William Dafoe is the guy from Wild at Heart. Truly nice teeth. Ends up
blowing his own head off but has very memorable seen with Laura Dern. One
can only wonder if the Braves fan suffers similar ignominy.
FWIW, Dafoe made a mark with his portrayal of the title role in "Last
Temptation of Jesus Christ".
TTom
 | 
| 3.303 | One of my faves.  He and Mickey Rourke should team up | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:38 | 9 | 
|  |     Willem Dafoe:
    
    Streets of Fire
    To Live and Die in LA (played a most excellent bad guy)
    Platoon
    (some other Vietnam movie with Gregory Hines and Fred Ward)
    Last Temptation of Jesus Christ
    Wild at Heart
    
 | 
| 3.305 | I've always been a closet Braves fan | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RussMeyers-UnappreciatedGenius | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:29 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.306 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:30 | 8 | 
|  |     
    >>How did LA not win the NL West?
    
    The whole team choked on one of Tommy Lasordid's Ultra-Slim Fascist
    cartons!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.307 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:31 | 12 | 
|  |     
    >> <<< Note 3.305 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "RussMeyers-UnappreciatedGenius" >>>
    >>               -< I've always been a closet Braves fan >-
    
    
    Right, but you're still in the closet on some things, right
    slasher??????
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.308 | Slasher's in the closet doin' the tomahawk chop! | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:34 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.309 |  | CAM::WAY | With Malice Toward None | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:50 | 23 | 
|  | Read in an article not long after his stunning performance in Platoon
(all the performances in that movie were GREAT), but anyway,
Willem Dafoe's REAL name is William.
When he was a kid a baby brother or someone couldn't pronounce William
and it came out Willem.  It was kind of a nickname that stuck, and
he's used it as a stage name since he got into acting.
Some of his friends were so taken by his "death" in Platoon that they
called him to see if he was okay.
Now, as to /Don in the closet, the only thang he doing in there is
desensitizing his filberts for the Olympics, so that if dInz *does*
tickle him there, it won't blow their routine.
Finally, I'm glad Atlanta won.  It's nice to see someone different
in there for a change....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.310 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RussMeyers-UnappreciatedGenius | Mon Oct 07 1991 15:05 | 5 | 
|  |     	Be nice boys, otherwise when the Braves beat the Pirates we
    won't let you on this wagon.  We've already thrown Faux and his
    Excellent Losses off.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.311 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Tired of it. | Mon Oct 07 1991 16:01 | 2 | 
|  |     Dafoe was not a nice man in To Live And Die In L.A. He did have some
    huge ganos though. 
 | 
| 3.312 | On Pittsburgh | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | From MattSewell to MikeSewell | Tue Oct 08 1991 12:34 | 10 | 
|  |     Big question now is...
    
    Cain the Pirates actually sell out their NCLS games?  If not, maybe
    they cain bring in that stupid-assed Elvis impersonator and Ulf-the-
    Underhanded to perk things up a bit to attract more attendees by 
    working the stands.  If that won't work, I suggest Fay pick up the
    tix and T&L and bus in several thousand real baseball fans from 
    Cincinnati to make for a sellout.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.313 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Tue Oct 08 1991 12:41 | 7 | 
|  |     re -.312
    
    
    Y A W N !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.314 | What's dat smell | CTHQ3::LEARY |  | Tue Oct 08 1991 12:43 | 13 | 
|  |     Several thousand fans from Cincinnati,
    Why 3/4 of dem musta be from Kaintuck, so if'n you import 'em to
    Pittsburgh, that'll lower/increase the IQ level of Steel City by a
    significant amount, dependin' on yo' perspective. Since Pittsburghians
    support said-maimster UlfEeeee,I gotsa believe the IQ will be greatly
    increased.
    
    
    And THAT's even admittin' that when several thousand Cincinnati fans
    simultaneously think, all fire dept.'s are put on top alert!!
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.315 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Tue Oct 08 1991 13:40 | 27 | 
|  |     
    >>support said-maimster UlfEeeee,I gotsa believe the IQ will be greatly
    >>increased.
    
    
    >>And THAT's even admittin' that when several thousand Cincinnati fans
    >>simultaneously think, all fire dept.'s are put on top alert!!
    
    >>MikeL
    
    
    Hey Mike, thanks, I was feelin' sorta down today until I read this and
    got a huge laugh out of it.
    
                                  
    BTW, who has 18 teef and an IQ of 136??????
    
    The State of Ohio(not including Clevescum)
    with Clevescum it's
    
    19 teef and an IQ of 63
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.316 |  | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | The gnat that bit MrT | Tue Oct 08 1991 16:33 | 21 | 
|  | From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.news.law.crime.sex,clari.news.group.women,biz.clarinet.sample
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 91 10:10:27 EDT
 
	PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- A New Jersey woman claims New York Mets pitcher
David Cone raped her in a Philadelphia hotel room last weekend.
	Police say they are investigating the allegations by the 24-year-
woman but no charges have been filed.
	The woman says the 28-year-old Cone assaulted her at the Hilton
Towers in downtown Philadelphia on Saturday night.
	Hours after the alleged assault, Cone tied a National League record
by striking out 19 Philadelphia Phillies in the last game of the season.
	The woman reported the incident on Sunday.
	A published report Tuesday quotes a source as saying Cone and the
woman, who were previously acquainted, met at a bar Saturday night and
then went to Cone's room.
	According to the report in the Philadelphia Inquirer, the woman
contends Cone, who was naked, forced himself on her after she gave him a
massage.
	Police spokesman Ed Tenuto says that for now the incident is being
treated as an ``allegation,'' not a rape.
 | 
| 3.317 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | IGRFH | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:25 | 10 | 
|  |     I see USelessA TODAY researches their facks.
    
    The say, in both an article, and in a picture caption that Andy Van
    Slyke is a "Switch hitter".
    
    Funny, in the years that he's been in Pittsburgh, I've never once seen
    him bat right handed.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.318 | For the record... | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Thu Oct 10 1991 09:32 | 10 | 
|  |     Pirates win 5-1.  Andy "can't hit lefties" VanSlyke took young Glavine
    deep in the first inning and had an RBI double in the third.  That
    essentially ended it.  So lord knows why Drabek felt compelled to try
    to turn that double into a triple.  He could be out for his next
    scheduled start (Sunday) but the paper today says it doesn't appear to
    be that serious.
    
    Go Bucs!
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.319 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Thu Oct 10 1991 09:55 | 13 | 
|  |     > Pirates win 5-1.  Andy "can't hit lefties" VanSlyke took young Glavine
    > deep in the first inning and had an RBI double in the third.  That
    > essentially ended it. 
    
    yep, when I saw that ball go over the fence I knew right then and there
    it wasn't going to be the Braves' night.
    
    Got a kick out of how Buck and McCarver said absolutely nothing after
    Van Slyke connected...didn't need a bunch of commentary, the crowd
    noise and picture spoke for itself.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.320 |  | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | The gnat that bit MrT | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:20 | 6 | 
|  | 	Van Slyke does have much more of a problem with most lefties.
	Unfortunately for Atlanta, Tom Glavine isn't one of those he has
	a problem with, as his lifetime average vs Glavine is around .370.
	BTW, Doug Drabek's next scheduled start is Monday.  Randy Tomlin
	is slated as the game 4 starter on Sunday night vs Leibrandt.
 | 
| 3.321 |  | CAM::WAY | With Malice Toward None | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:23 | 6 | 
|  | Regardless of whether Drabek was smart to try and stretch it into
a triple or not, it sure was fun to watch a pitcher step into the box,
swing some lumber, and poke the ball over the CF's haid!
'Saw_who_wishes_the_DH_would_go_AWAY!
 | 
| 3.322 | We miss ya, Dan... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:33 | 20 | 
|  |     
> Regardless of whether Drabek was smart to try and stretch it into
> a triple or not, it sure was fun to watch a pitcher step into the box,
> swing some lumber, and poke the ball over the CF's haid!
    
    Exackly what I said when it happened...
    
    But, to be fair since he's not here, let's give equal time to the
    opinion of Dan Schneider:
    
    "That poke by Drabek is exactly why we need the DH.  It serves as a
    reminder of how rare such occurrences really are.  Why, the other two
    times up Drabek struck out feebly.  The near-triple is strictly
    anecdotal evidence of the fictional excitement that is generated with 
    a pitcher up at the plate..."
    
    We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.323 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:36 | 11 | 
|  |     T'wer a truly excellent game.
    
    Van Slyke for the HoF.
    
    Glavine should go back to hockey.  (8^)*
    
    Bucs in 5
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.324 | Is Drabek hurt? | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:43 | 8 | 
|  | Is Drabek's injury serious?  I heard pulled muscle, but didn't hear if he will
be able to make his next start.
I know Van Slyke gets his share of press, but it was still nice to see him as 
the hero, rather than Bonds or Bonilla.  Taking nothing away from those guys,
of course.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.325 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Thu Oct 10 1991 11:41 | 11 | 
|  |     Lasted nites crowd of 57k+ was the largest crowd ever to see a game at
    3 Rivers Stadium.
    
    Haven't heard whether Drabek's injury is major or not.  ESPN this AM
    said Drabek will be checked today and more will be known later.
    
    Van Slyke earned a major portion of his $4.2 million lasted night.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.326 | yup we miss him... | AGNT99::CHILDS | Hey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya? | Thu Oct 10 1991 12:52 | 12 | 
|  | 
 Most excellent Glenn!!!!!hahahahahaa
 If I didn't look at the header I'd have sworn I was reading true Schneidisms...
 hahaa
 yup Andy's shot was the game last night. Before it Glavine looked like
 a cool collected customer, after it he looked all hopped up like he'd
 got a bad batch of Saw's Shrooms....
 mike
 | 
| 3.328 | Sweep? | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:58 | 5 | 
|  | >	BTW, Doug Drabek's next scheduled start is Monday.  
    
    They're starting the world series on Monday?  ;-}
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.329 | Andy is a rocket scientist on off days | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Thu Oct 10 1991 14:55 | 11 | 
|  |     I am as big a fan of VanSlyke as possible.  I got to point this out
    however...
    
    In the post game interview, Andy says...
    
    "Now I know how Cin. felt after taking the first game last year."
    
    Obviously Andy is no brain surgeon.  Pitt won game one last year.  It
    must be nice to be in your own little world!
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.330 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Thu Oct 10 1991 15:04 | 7 | 
|  |     Van SLyke's clubhouse nickname is "Norman Bates".
    
    That about says it all.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.331 | Andy Van Slyke = William Bedford = Jack Clark = brain surgeons | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Thu Oct 10 1991 15:17 | 0 | 
| 3.332 | Great pitching on both sides last night | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Fri Oct 11 1991 08:16 | 10 | 
|  |     Barry Bonds continues to be Mr. Untober.  At two key points in last
    night's game he grounded into a double play and popped up.  The latter
    was especially costly because Bonilla had a lead off double and there
    were no outs in the ninth.  Braves win 1-0 in a terrific pitcher's
    duel.
    
    He better produce in Atlanta or the Pirates might have a long trip home
    next Monday night.  They need to win two or they're done.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.333 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:30 | 17 | 
|  |     IMHO, Avery threw a masterpiece at the Bucs lasted night.
    
    What killed the Bucs was the mis-play at third base, which allowed Dave
    Justice to score.   I think it was a combination of Bueschel splitting
    his concentration between getting the ball and tagging Justice, instead
    of concentrating on getting the ball first, then worrying about
    Justice, and one ton of spin on the ball causing it to take a weird
    hop.    When Zane Smith got out of the bases loaded and nobody out jam
    in the second, I thought it would be another oneof the Bucs nights, but
    Steve Avery had different thoughts on that, eh!!
    
    On to Atlanta tomorrow and as --dan'l, Mr Swimmer, said, the Bucs HAVE
    to take 2 out of 3 there or we could be witnessing 1990 all over again.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.334 | Pirates didn't even whimper till the eighth | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:43 | 20 | 
|  | 
    > Barry Bonds continues to be Mr. Untober.  At two key points in last
    > night's game he grounded into a double play and popped up.  The latter
    > was especially costly because Bonilla had a lead off double and there
    > were no outs in the ninth.  Braves win 1-0 in a terrific pitcher's
    > duel.
    
    Three-and-one count, too, dan'l.  That really hurt.  Bonds had reason 
    to be upset after that one, although it's generally considered classier 
    to throw your tantrum in the dugout instead of out on the field.
    
    Steve Avery was immense.  I think one of the biggest myths in baseball 
    is the advantage of being the "experienced veteran" in a pennant race 
    and the postseason (as the Braves have shown since the All-Star break).  
    In the last two days we've seen great efforts from Juan Guzman and now
    Avery, who looks like he's still a junior in high school.  If you're 
    good, you're good...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.335 |  | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Fri Oct 11 1991 10:44 | 6 | 
|  | It's too bad that Beucelle will wear the goat's hat for lasted night.  From
what I saw on ESPN towards the end of the season he was rock solid at 3B.  I 
agree that Avery pitched a great game, nothing like a good old pitchers duel/
defensive game.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.336 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:56 | 14 | 
|  |     Another thing that erks me about the way lasted nights game ended.
    
    (Can't remember who it was that endedn the game at the plate)
    The Guy who got called out on strikes at the end of the game should be
    jabbed in the a$$ with a branding iron.  With 2 out and a guy on third,
    tying run, the game on the line and Pen� on the mound throwing nothing 
    but heaters, if the ball is within 6 or 8 inches of the strike zone, ya 
    gotta swing at it. The pitch that ended the game wasn't even close to 
    being a ball and the BOZO lets the damned thing go by.   Leyland should 
    pull out theo old "reamer" and give the guy a new "southrern end".
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe              
 | 
| 3.337 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:59 | 4 | 
|  | 	If all the games are like last night, I hope this thing goes
    7 games.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.338 |  | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:02 | 8 | 
|  |     Jake, nothing used to get me PO'd more than having someone take a pitch
    in that situation, with a count of 2 strikes already.  
    
    Hey, we need a modern-day Yogi Berra.  Hell, he used to pick them off
    of his feet, or even over his head, and get that run in.  Probably was
    THE best badball hitter to ever play.
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.339 | No. 21 | SHALOT::HUNT | Ted, that's the prom queen !!! | Fri Oct 11 1991 12:30 | 8 | 
|  |  �   Hey, we need a modern-day Yogi Berra.  Hell, he used to pick them off
 �   of his feet, or even over his head, and get that run in.  Probably was
 �   THE best badball hitter to ever play.
 
 Beg to disagree ... Roberto Clemente was the best badball hitter of
 all time.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.341 | I'll cast a vote for Billy Williams as well ... | LUNER::BROOKS | Clarence T, are you down wit OPP ? | Fri Oct 11 1991 13:09 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.342 |  | SMARTT::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:03 | 3 | 
|  |     I don't know about best, but according to my calendar of Hall of Famers
    hanging in my office, this month's calendar boy, Yogi Berra, was "a
    notorious badball hitter."
 | 
| 3.343 | mike royko article | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Sat Oct 12 1991 12:45 | 79 | 
|  | From: [email protected] (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: NICE TOWNS FINISH IN FIRST, AT LAST
Date: 9 Oct 91 16:30:30 GMT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	
	The last time the Cubs made the playoffs, readers in other parts of
the country sent me numerous newspaper columns written by those who
loathe the Cubs, their fans and Chicago.
	They were fun to read because that's part of baseball's charm,
finding some irrational reason to dislike strangers and hoping a flyball
lands on their heads.
	Because the Cubs are so seldom involved in postseason play, I've
always prepared for the playoffs and the World Series by trying to work
up a good hate. It's either that or fall asleep in front of the tube.
	The choice has been easy when a New York team is involved, Yankees or
Mets. The Yankees, because as a child I was taught that they represented
the greedy forces of Wall Street who exploited the workers. My
grandfather taught me that. I later learned that my grandfather was
mostly exploited by bookies and bartenders, but I disliked the Yankees
out of habit.
	And the Mets? Well, any Cubs fan knows why.
	It is also easy to generate an instant grudge against any California
team, with their effete, face-lifted, fanny-tucked movie-star groupies
and laid-back, trend-hopping, glassy-eyed fans. If nothing else, I
merely remind myself that California gave the nation Richard Nixon and
Ronald Reagan. May its grapes rot.
	As you can see, the players have nothing to do with it. The choice of
hate objects is dictated by the city, the state or the region. Sort of
my own personal mini-civil war.
	In a pinch, for example, I can develop an instant hate against
Boston. It's a nice city, but I just remind myself that Harvard is
there, and like any decent, envious, class-conscious American, I'm
filled with resentment. And the thought of Ted Kennedy helps too.
	But this year, generating even a mild dislike is a challenge. I can't
remember any playoffs when there have been four cities so ... I'm trying
to think of the right word ... decent, I suppose.
	Minneapolis. How can anyone dislike Minneapolis? The city is so
clean. The politicians are so honest that they must be retarded. And the
people, most of them well-scrubbed Scandinavians, are so polite and
decent that when they catch a walleye, which is their main recreational
activity, they thank it for biting their hook. And Minneapolis gave us
Hubert Humphrey, the last liberal Democrat who didn't look morose.
	Pittsburgh, another town that can only be described as nice. Can
anyone say Detroit is nice? Or Miami, Chicago, New York or even
Philadelphia? No, but Pittsburgh is nice. It used to be a sooty mill
town, but now it is neat. Many of the people are real ethnics, but they
don't stomp each other out of pride. And I'm told that very few women in
Pittsburgh get their biceps tattooed anymore.
	Toronto. I suppose I could use the fact that it's a Canadian city as
an excuse to sneer and jeer at their efforts to become champions of our
national pastime. (No, not homicide, silly, baseball.) And if it were
Montreal, I might become chauvinistic because in Montreal they persist
in talking French, a language favored by twits and snobs. I even resent
the fact that French is spoken in Paris, a practice calculated to
frustrate American tourists. But Toronto is another clean, civilized
city. And when I visited there, I couldn't help being impressed at how
fluently the natives spoke English, considering that they are
foreigners.
	Atlanta. It is a tempting target because it's in the South, and I've
never understood why Southerners brag about their hospitality when their
roadside restaurants deep fry everything, even spaghetti, and their bars
are populated by beady-eyed guys named Junior and Rufus, who are hostile
to anyone who doesn't have facial bottle scars. But Atlanta isn't like
that. The last time I was there, I ate in a fine restaurant where the
waiter removed the cork from the wine bottle and offered it for my
perusal. That is sophistication. And with a touch of salt on it, it was
the finest cork I ever ate. Besides, Ted Turner is from Atlanta, and
ever since he took up with Jane Fonda, she hasn't said one idiotic
thing, which is her all-time record.
	So I don't know what I'm going to do to generate some wholesome
venom. I never thought I'd say it. Or even think it. And I'm not sure
that I can write it. But I'll try.
	I really miss the Mets.
	
	(C) 1991 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
 | 
| 3.344 | royko article: Bucs doomed... | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Sat Oct 12 1991 12:47 | 95 | 
|  | From: [email protected] (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: PIRATES COURTING `FACTOR' DISASTER
Date: 11 Oct 91 16:01:41 GMT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	
	It was a year ago, almost to the day, that I was the target of
widespread ridicule and derision. Oh, the hooting and jeering I endured.
	That was the day, shortly before the World Series began, that the
headline above my essay declared: ``A's might as well throw in the
towel.''
	As that headline indicated, I had written that the Oakland A's did
not have the remotest chance of winning the series.
	Some of my sportswriting associates and many readers thought it was
the most idiotically funny thing they had ever seen.
	Didn't I know, they asked, that the mighty A's were overwhelming,
unbeatable, incomparable, and were creating a dynasty? They had won the
previous World Series in four straight. They had just won their playoff
series in four straight. They were like Desert Storm.
	Or, in the words of Ben Bentley, host of the Sportswriters TV
madhouse: ``Could the A's be the greatest team in history?''
	We all know what happened next. Not only did they lose, but they
didn't win one game. They were crushed and humiliated, and they haven't
been the same since.
	So here we are, once again approaching the World Series. And once
again I caution the experts: Don't sneer at a mysterious force that is
so powerful it defies all odds, all logic, and can change the course of
baseball history.
	I'm referring, of course, to the amazing Ex-Cub Factor.
	For those who may be unaware of it, the Ex-Cub Factor works this way:
	Since 1946, 14 teams have entered the World Series with three or more
former Cubs on their rosters.
	As with Oakland last year, some of these teams were thought to be
superior to their opponent. Others weren't that strong. But bulge of
bicep, fleetness of foot, managerial cunning, experience, poise -- none
of it mattered.
	All but one of these Cubs-tainted teams lost.
	That's what happened last year. The Oakland A's had three ex-Cubs.
They lost in four straight games. One year earlier, when they had only
two ex-Cubs, they won in four straight games. Strange, eerie and
terrifying.
	So what does that tell us will happen this year? It tells us that if
the brawny and cocky Pittsburgh Pirates get past the upstart Atlanta
Braves, the Pirates will be doomed.
	That's because the Pirates, in an act of suicidal folly, put four ex-
Cubs on their roster. No other team in the playoffs has the curse of
even three.
	You would think that by now, no team would defy the Ex-Cub Factor. It
hasn't been a secret.
	It was discovered in 1981 by a Ron Berler, a Chicago writer, teacher
and baseball stats nut. He sounded the alarm, but did the experts
listen? No, they sneered and said it had no scientific validity; it was
just a silly, meaningless coincidence.
	That's what they said when the Boston Red Sox had certain victory
within their grasp. Then Bill Buckner, one of their three ex-Cubs, let
that fatal ground ball dribble it all away.
	And that's what they said before the unbeatable Oakland A's, with
their four ex-Cubs, turned to mush.
	Naturally, the ex-Cubs become indignant when it is suggested that
they might be responsible for disaster.
	A reporter mentioned the Factor to Gary Varsho, one of the four ex-
Cubs on the Pirates. He dismissed it, saying: ``No one around here
brings it up or thinks about it.''
	Naturally, he'd say that. If managers ever come to accept the virtual
certainty of the Factor, no ex-Cub would be able to find work. They
might have to file discrimination complaints with the federal
government. But even the bureaucrats might hesitate to take action when
they looked at the evidence.
	Nobody knows why the Cub factor is so devastating. It isn't that the
ex-Cubs are terrible players. Some are remarkably good, such as Dennis
Eckersley, of the A's, who became a big star after he left the Cubs. Of
course, he might have been a big star with the Cubs if he had ever
experimented with pitching while sober.
	Some students of the game believe that having once been Cubs gives
players something called ``Cubness,'' which means that in their hearts
they know they're losers.
	But this theory doesn't hold up. If a team has only one or two ex-
Cubs, their Cubness doesn't appear. Which is why Toronto, with mighty
Joe Carter, an ex-Cub, isn't afflicted. Only when there are three does
the Factor kick in.
	Which has led some scholars, such as Dr. I.M. Kookie, the noted
expert on lots of stuff, to theorize that it is not a curse, but a virus
that becomes active only when there are three carriers in the same
dugout.
	If this is true, one would think that the government would have
launched a research program to isolate this virus and find a cure.
	But as Dr. Kookie says: ``There would be a taxpayers' revolt. With
all the other problems in the world, why spend good money to find out
why Cubs are losers? It's something we have to live with. Like the new
old saying goes: `Two Cubs are company, three's a complete disaster.'''
	
	(C) 1991 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
 | 
| 3.345 | Bonds Sucks | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 14 1991 00:29 | 8 | 
|  |     Pirates take game four, 3-2 in ten innings.  Ex Digital employee Mike
    LaVallier tags clutch hit.
    
    I'm a complete ball of noives.
    
    Goodnight.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.346 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:17 | 11 | 
|  |     I just figured something out.   
    
    Eric Gregg is using a chartered "Concorde" plane and travelling at high
    speeds betwixt the ALCS games and the NLCS games.  At the ALCS games he
    is going by the name of Kirby Puckett!!!
    
    
    Many, many (8^)*'s
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.347 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:21 | 16 | 
|  |     The Bucs are trying hard to overcome the "Ex-Cub factor", as they have
    more ex Cubbies on their roster than the Atlanta Braves do.
    
    BTW, is it just me or what.  Somewhere near the 3rd inning of each
    game, I'm ready to turn off the TV sound 'cause I'm sick of that Indian
    singing in the stands at Fullofit County Stadium.  Hell, I'd rather
    watch the Steeler games and see Brister's mother 3 or 4 hundred times a
    game than listen to that chanting.
    
    I still say the Braves fans stole the "tomahawk chop" motion from
    PeeWee Herman!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.348 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:23 | 13 | 
|  | What annoys me is that you can tell the Atlanta fans are "rookie fans".
Having just hopped on the bandwagon at mid-season or so, they are inept
as to the art of true fandom.
That tomahawk chop thing is SOOOOO hokey, ad are most of the fans.
It almost peed my pant last night, as the camera found these two old
ladies, who most likely had no idea that a curve ball is any different
that a highball, and they're all doing the tomahawk chop.  Stupid.
'Saw
 | 
| 3.349 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:27 | 13 | 
|  |     I HAVE A REQUEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    I'm in class out here in Colorado Springs all day today, and the
    Bucs-Braves game starts at 1pm, Colorado time.
    
    Could someone that listens(or watches) today game whilst it is going on
    put some updates in here throughtout the afternoon????
    
    
    It would be DEEPLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.350 | Tomahawk this | SHALOT::MEDVID | I'll sail this ship alone | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:36 | 22 | 
|  | >    BTW, is it just me or what.  Somewhere near the 3rd inning of each
>    game, I'm ready to turn off the TV sound 
    
    It's Tim McCarver that's getting to me.  He adds nothing to the game as
    far as I'm concerned.  "Yes, Tim, I did see the catcher run to third on
    the bunt.  Routine.  You don't have to replay it five times."  Why does
    he insist on reporting the extremely obvious when just the obvious will
    do?
    
    Last year, when Penn State played FSU in the Blockbuster Bowl, the
    Seminole fans did the tomahawk thing the entire game.  At the time, I
    thought it was great.  In fact, I remember saying to myself, "I wish I
    had gone to school there.  That looks like a fun crowd."  Now I'm not
    so sure.  Maybe it's the fact that these adults are the ones doing it,
    including Jane Fonda and the former president of the US.
    
    Actually, when they show the crowd, you can see some old, die-hard
    Braves fans (the few hundred that went to the games even when they were
    losing) just sitting there.  I can almost hear them saying, "For God's
    sake, ya'll, please shut up!"
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.351 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:40 | 9 | 
|  |     
    >>so sure.  Maybe it's the fact that these adults are the ones doing it,
    >>including Jane Fonda and the former president of the US.
                ^^^^^^^^^^
    
    I must say, for someone in her 50's. Jane still looks pretty good!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.352 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 11:23 | 9 | 
|  |     While Barry Bonds continues to possess a VERY anemic bat, he does
    continue to play good defense.
    
    I felt he got screwed on being charged with an error on the play at the
    plate in the first inning.  Slaught missed the ball, the throw was on
    the money.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.353 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 14 1991 11:39 | 2 | 
|  |     The ex-Cubs factor doesn't kick in until the WS.  There is no
    correlation between number of ex-Cubbies and CS performance.
 | 
| 3.354 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Seachickens & Blue Jays are Chokers! | Mon Oct 14 1991 11:44 | 12 | 
|  |     Come on JaKe, if you were a *real* baseball fan you would've been sick
    today.  :^) :^)
    
    Let's get this straight once and for all: the FSU fans originated the
    tomahawk chop and the Indian chant; the Braves and Chiefs have copied
    it just this year.  I turned on a few minutes of the baseball game last
    night and Atlanta's chant is weak - the FSU fans can make that
    much noise when they're on the road.  You ever watch an FSU home game?  
    That war chant is very, very loud the whole game. 
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.355 | Anyone hear an echo | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Mon Oct 14 1991 12:00 | 7 | 
|  |     I cain't wait till nexted year when my new amour, them Cleveland
    Indians start out of the block in April
    Cain't you feel the emotion!! The 250 Indian fans Chop, Chop, Choppin'
    away!
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.356 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Mon Oct 14 1991 12:15 | 9 | 
|  |     > Let's get this straight once and for all: the FSU fans originated the
    > tomahawk chop and the Indian chant
    
    No one disputes that -- in fact, didn't all this Braves chopping start
    with Deion Sanders (from FSU) doing it in the dugout in an early seaosn
    game?
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.357 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 12:16 | 9 | 
|  |     
    >>Come on JaKe, if you were a *real* baseball fan you would've been sick
    >>today.  :^) :^)
    
    I'd kill for one of those SONY Watchman things right now(well actually,
    in about 2 hrs and 45 mins.)
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.359 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Oct 14 1991 12:18 | 14 | 
|  |     
    	Ditto on this chanting...  It is stolen and Atlanta and Chief
    fans should have to pay restitution to FSU! :-)
    
    	I'll admit, a couple of years ago when I watched FSU for the first
    time against Miami and their fans were doing that chant, I felt the
    same as Dan'l...awesome chant.  This is what college football in
    general is all about.  To this day, when I hear it, it sends chills
    up and down my spine.  Greatest cheer I've heard, and I think it is
    pretty un-imaginative for these other teams to adopt it as their own.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
 | 
| 3.360 | stop the chant! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Oct 14 1991 12:41 | 6 | 
|  |     Between McCarver's innane chatter and the war chant, I'm glad I have a
    mute button on the remote control.  The headaches are getting to me.
    Why can't the fans in Atlanta just scream, yell, and throw stuff like
    the rest of the country?
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.361 | 10/14 NLCS Game | CGVAX2::MILLER |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:42 | 5 | 
|  |     
    Does anybody have an update to this afternoons game?
    
    
    steve
 | 
| 3.362 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:49 | 11 | 
|  |     If someone with brains went into Fullofit County stadium in Atlanta,
    and went to each fan with a fake foam tomahawk, and shoved the thing
    down the owners throat, what would the maintenance crew have to clean
    up under the seats after the game????
    
    Toma-HOCKERS!!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.363 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:51 | 3 | 
|  |     zip-zip after 2.  Braves just had the sacks saturated with no outs,
    but failed to score.
    
 | 
| 3.364 | update | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:59 | 5 | 
|  |     Bucs go down 1-2-3 in the top of the third.  In the home half of the
    second... Glavin fails to get the suicide squeeze bunt down... the
    Pirates get a double play.
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.365 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:15 | 2 | 
|  |     0-0, Braves batting in bottom of 4th ...
    
 | 
| 3.366 | 0-0 after 4 | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:26 | 7 | 
|  |     Braves seemingly go up 1-0 in the 4th, as David Justice scores from
    2nd on a single.  
    
    BUT NO!!!!!!!!!!  He missed 3rd base!!!!!!  Declared ***OUT***!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.367 | Bizarre | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Hi-OO Silver, Awaaayyyy | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:27 | 16 | 
|  |     ANd a bizarre bottom of the 4th.  Justice hits a grounder toward lind
    that Redus fields and throws away - Justice to 2nd.
    
    Hunter hits a tapper in front of plate, and is called out on
    interference - just like Armbrister/Fisk, I guess (I'm listening on the
    radio, not watching...)
    
    Then Olson hits a line drive to center, that is questioned if it is a
    catch or not.  It is.  2 outs, Justice on 2nd.
    
    Lemke singled, Justice scored - but is called out when Smith throws
    ball to Buchele at 3rd - Justice missed the base...
    
    Braves are squandering lots of chances...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.368 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:30 | 6 | 
|  |     Bonds just popped up to lead off the fifth.  Oh wait, that's not knew. 
    You probably could have guessed that.
    
    VanSlyke did indeed catch that ball in the bottom of the 4th.  No question.
    
    
 | 
| 3.369 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:33 | 2 | 
|  |     Beuchel and Slaught on first and second, 1 out.
    
 | 
| 3.370 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:34 | 1 | 
|  |     Beuchel scores on Lind's RBI single.  Pirates lead 1-0.
 | 
| 3.371 | Keep dem reports coming | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:38 | 8 | 
|  |     Good work --dan'l, JD, and ACChris, keep it up, I got to see the 
    lasted out of the 4th whilst on break but it's back to serious learning
    now.
    
    Mucho Appreciated
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.372 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:39 | 1 | 
|  |     Pirates strand Slaught and Lind, lead 1-0 going into bottom of 5th.
 | 
| 3.373 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:51 | 2 | 
|  |     Atlanta threatens in bottom of 5th but comes up empty.  Smith pitching
    well.
 | 
| 3.374 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:56 | 5 | 
|  |     VanSlyke doubles off Glavine.  Deadmeat of the order coming up with one
    out in top of 6th.  
    
    Bonilla being intentionally walked.  Here you go, Mr. Bonds.  Time to
    deliver.
 | 
| 3.375 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:58 | 1 | 
|  |     Bonnds strikes out looking.  What a freaking bum.
 | 
| 3.376 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 16:59 | 1 | 
|  |     Beuchel grounds out for third out.
 | 
| 3.377 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:05 | 1 | 
|  |     1-2-3 inning for Smith in bottom of 6th.
 | 
| 3.378 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:10 | 1 | 
|  |     1-2-3 inning for Glavine (Smith being third out).
 | 
| 3.379 | Still 1-0. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:18 | 3 | 
|  |     Braves go down 1, 2, 3.
    
    
 | 
| 3.380 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:30 | 3 | 
|  |     Top of the 8th, 2 outs, Bell on third.  Again they intentionally walk
    Bonilla to pitch to Bonds and true to form, Bonds flies out.  Still 1-0
    Pirates in bottom of 8th.
 | 
| 3.381 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:35 | 3 | 
|  |     Bottom of 8th, 2 out.  Pendleton triples.  Leyland replacing Smith
    w/ Roger Mason ...
    
 | 
| 3.382 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:36 | 1 | 
|  |     Pendelton hits two-out triple in 8th.  Leyland calls for Roger Mason.
 | 
| 3.383 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:36 | 2 | 
|  |     Beat ya to it, dan'l!
    
 | 
| 3.384 | Hi, Chris! | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:36 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.385 | Hi. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:37 | 2 | 
|  |     This is just like VAX PHONE!
    
 | 
| 3.386 |  | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:40 | 2 | 
|  |     Gant pops up.  1-0 after 8.
    
 | 
| 3.387 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:42 | 1 | 
|  |     Roger Mason shuts down Braves.
 | 
| 3.388 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:53 | 4 | 
|  |     Pirates get Beuchel to third with two outs.  Leyland does not hit for
    Mason.  Tries suicide squeeze.  Pena balks (yes it looked like one to
    me, he had his hands up and set for a second) but it isn't called. 
    Leyland pretty POed.  Mason strikes out.
 | 
| 3.389 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Clarence Thomas for President | Mon Oct 14 1991 17:58 | 13 | 
|  |     Hey, I don't wanna place a down note in here but we were watching
    the game last night and everybody was noticing how tentative, even
    defensive, the Pirates were playing.  Then on came a shot a Jim
    Leyland smoking a butt in the dugout.  Some wag in the room then
    commented, "no wonder Leyland's smoking and the Pirates need dumb
    errors to win games - the Pirates' coach looks like a_AIDS victim,
    so he figures he doesn't have long to live anyway and the players 
    just want to finish these games and git out a the lockerroom and
    shower back at the hotel!"
    
    Unfair comment?  Maybe.  But this had to be reported.
    
    MrT(wins Win)
 | 
| 3.390 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:00 | 1 | 
|  |     One out, bottom of ninth, Braves have runners on first and second.
 | 
| 3.391 | Pirates lead series 3-2. | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:04 | 3 | 
|  |     Roger Mason pitches out of jam.  Pirates win 1-0.
    
    Zane Smith player of the game.
 | 
| 3.392 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:06 | 10 | 
|  |     Re .389
    
    "T" go tell your mother she wants ya.   Already trying to stir things
    up for the BUcs/Minnysoda series that the Bucs will take in 6, huh??
    
    re --dan'l and ACChris, thanks tons for the updates.  DEEPLY
    Preshkiated!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.393 | yea, guys - thanks for the updates - making a late night more enjoyable | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:34 | 0 | 
| 3.394 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:47 | 17 | 
|  |     From what I just heard, Wed. game will be Drabek .vs. Avery.
    
    I guess we'll get to see what Avery is really made of cause there'll be
    no tomorrow for the Braves(I hat using clich�s, BUT...).  Avery will
    have more pressure on his shoulders than he would if Eric Gregg was
    sitting on them.   (8^)*  (8^)*
    
    Barry Bonds, as --dan'l has stated before--has sipped indiscreetly
    thruout the NLCS.   He's trying too hard to hit every ball out of the
    park, hence, the tons of infield popups and short flyballs he's hit in
    the series.   Hell, when, during the regular season, does anybody
    recall them walking Bonilla with runner(s) already in scoring position,
    let alone doing it twice in one game???????
    Show how much the Braves respeck Bonds, don't it??
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.395 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 18:55 | 7 | 
|  |     FWIW, 
    
    Barry "0-fer" Bonds is 3 for 20, .150 avg, with NO RBI, with 3 stolen
    bases.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.396 | They had 'em all the way! | PRAVDA::JACKSON | You run your mouth, I'll run my business brother | Mon Oct 14 1991 20:34 | 38 | 
|  |     I just looked for this note today, and found it to be enjoying.  (esp
    the "What a freaking bum" comment about Bonds)
    
    
    It's amazing that Bonds has come up to be such a bum in post-season
    play.  (and I wish that nitwit would stop saying "he's always
    dangerous when he comes to the plate")   I took in three games in
    Pittsburgh this summer (they sewpt the hated Mets) and Bonds was on
    fire.  The guy can really hit the ball, but this week he sucks!
    
    Other comments:
    
    	Bonds got a bum rap for the throwing error
    	Jay Bell was out at third
    	Both teams have squandered more runs in this one series than
    	  I've ever seen before
    	The Pirates are the better team, but they sure aren't playing 
     	  Like it.
    	Leland took a hell of a chance today letting Mason hit
    	  (he would have been in serious trouble if the braves had scored)
    	Why do these games start so damned late?  Last night's 12:30 finish
    	  was a pain in the ass.
    	Is Doug Drabek really that stupid to try to stretch it to third?
    	Is Leland that stupid to encourage that behavior?
    	The Atlanta fans are obnoxious with their chop.  It was neat the
    	   first time I saw it
    	Tim McCarver is an idiot
    
    And finally
    
    	I'm Soooooo Jealous of my brother, who has tickets to Games 6/7 of
    the NLCS and games 3/4 of the World Series.
    
    
    -bill
    From Pittsburgh
    
    
 | 
| 3.397 | back to the quiet of 3Rivers | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Oct 14 1991 20:38 | 14 | 
|  |     Barry "I want 4.2 mil" Bonds may not need to wake up...
    
    VanSlyke's comment about bad Pirate pitching sure looks stupid now...
    
    The much maligned Buc pitching appears to be good enough.  Mason really
    did a great job today.  Five pitches to Gant and not one ball.
    
    How good are the Pirates at catching the ball in the OF?  As good as it
    gets.
    
    This series may be over in game six.  Thank goodness the chant is
    history for this NLCS!
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.398 | Time for MrT to take in his first game of the year again | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Oct 14 1991 20:43 | 19 | 
|  |     
    The Pirates may just yet win this thing, but I gotta admit that they're
    giving me heart failure doing it.  The Braves have outplayed them, but
    just aren't pulling the trigger on situations.  Two tight games in a 
    row where an Atlanta win probably pushes the Bucs over the edge for
    good, but they manage to pull 'em both out (thank gawd that Cox pulled
    Mercker last night; I had a good feeling about the forgotten free agent 
    Spanky Lavalliere-- Smokey Burgess reincarnate-- coming through, what 
    with all this billion-dollar talent around him floundering).  Hopefully 
    Game 6 will be short and sweet, with the Bucs finally breaking loose at 
    home.
    
    It's everyone's greatest nightmare looking like it'll be back from the 
    dead: Pittsburgh versus Minnetwinky (no cockiness here; until counted 
    out these Braves are still alive).  Gotta hand it to those northerners 
    to keep coming back from adversity, only to be hammered down again...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.399 | A few things... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 00:54 | 13 | 
|  | >    - the Pirates' coach looks like a_AIDS victim,
>    so he figures he doesn't have long to live anyway 
    
    T, this is one of the most offensive and insensative comments I have
    ever read in this conference.  Please be a little more careful in the
    future.
    
    Bill Jackson, were you at the Saturday game in August when the Bucs
    swept the Mets?  So was I!  Two SPORTS noters so close and not getting
    together?  What's wrong with us?!?
    
    	--dan'l
    
 | 
| 3.400 | No more Braves...Puhleeze! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 15 1991 08:10 | 2 | 
|  |         That stupid war chant is starting to make the wave look good!
                                          Denny
 | 
| 3.401 |  | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Tue Oct 15 1991 08:57 | 6 | 
|  | 
    Re -1   I'll second that! Just a bunch of yuppies trying to get back to
           nature learning how to chop firewood. Please.....somebody make
           them stop!
     
                                                   Night Flier  ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.402 | Another good, old fashion pitcher's duel | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Dr. Seuss - RIP | Tue Oct 15 1991 09:05 | 11 | 
|  | From what I saw of the highlights of yesterday's game, it looks like the Braves
came down with a case of Red Sox disease (not beign able to come up with 
important hits).  
I heard on the radio this morning that replays reveal that David Justice did
indeed graze third base with his spikes on the way by.  Think of the uproar if
baseball had an instant replay official, and changed that ruling!!11
=Bob=
BTW - thanks again for the updates, guys
 | 
| 3.403 | Win some, lose some | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 10:11 | 5 | 
|  |     There was a miniscule puff of white powder only visible on super slow
    instant replay.  The fact that Justice didn't even argue the call says
    that he himself didn't feel his foot hit third.  Good call.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.404 | Da umpires view | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 10:22 | 19 | 
|  |     Umpire Crew Chief Doug Harbey's version of what happened yesterday,
    from USelessA TODAY:
    
    -on Dave Justice's failure to touch third after scoring on Mark Lemke's
    single:  "If you notice on replays, he went around third, held up and
    then broke.  He had a thought in his mind that he had missed third
    base.  That was the tipoff right there, when he stumbled, took a step
    back toward third and then broke for home"
    
    -On Andy Van Slyke's running grasstop catch of Greg Olson's liner
    "There was a catch and Dana DeMuth from the left field line ran out and
    called it immediately.  There was no doubt in my mind on it."
    
    -on the batter's interference against Brian Hunter:  "The hitter hit
    the ball, and he moved out in front of the plate and stood there.  Then
    he didn't make an attempt to run and they collided.  He never made an
    attempt to run."
    
    JaKe
 | 
| 3.405 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Sons of Katie Elder | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:16 | 25 | 
|  |     First, it always amazes me how snobbish fans are.  Whenever a team that
    hasn't been in the playoffs for a while gets in, and their fans show
    some enthusiasm, 'real' fans get down on them.  
    
    I think the chant is pretty neat.  I cold do without the foam tomahawks
    - but hey - i like them better than white hankies or green weenies.
    
    What's the big deal - what's the proper way to cheer.  Perhaps someone
    in this conference should write a book (hey, maybe we could collaborate
    on it) about the proper way to cheer at a ballpark.
    
    No doubt, most folks would want to use say, Boston fans, as models.  
    
    On the Series;
    
    I thought the Suicide Squeeze was a stupid call by Cox.  Bases loaded,
    let the pitcher strike out, and have your #1 and #2 men try to bring a
    run in.   
    
    Also, I think Cox should be playing Bream instead of Hunter.  Bream
    gets pumped up playing his ex-mates, plus he has experience and soul.
    I don't care about the lefty/righty thing.  I think using Hunter must
    make Leyland and the Bucs happy.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.406 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 15 1991 11:31 | 6 | 
|  |     	Justice did touch third and lucky for Barry Bonds that the umpire
    blew it because he would've had to answer why he double pumped and
    held on to the ball so long then made a bad throw to the plate.
    I wonder if Ed Armbrister watched the game?
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.407 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 15 1991 12:16 | 18 | 
|  |     
    re: -2
    
    	Wait a minute...the green weenie is sacred!  The green weenie was
    seen as a lucky charm to the 60 Pirates.  It just didn't develop over
    night during the world series.  You can't even put foam tomahawks in
    the same class as the green weenie!  
    
    	It seems as if Pittsburgh fans have a special place in their hearts
    for these lucky charms..  I can think of three.  The green weenie which
    helped propel the Pirates to the 60 series win.  The terrible towel
    which came along way before SB XIII, but helped propel the Steelers
    to 2 additional SB titles, and the babushka (sp).  The babushka was
    not as evident as the other two, but it was a trendy thing in the early
    70's for the Pirates.
    
    							bill..g.
    
 | 
| 3.408 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Tue Oct 15 1991 12:23 | 8 | 
|  |     
    	Not that it means anythang now, but Justice DID touch
    	3rd.  Jake, Glen Johnson, and I all saw the replay at
    	my house.  We all agreed he touched it.  It was ever
    	so slight, but that "puff of chalk" came from off the
    	top of the bag, not the foul line.
    
    	Claybroon
 | 
| 3.409 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Tue Oct 15 1991 12:41 | 15 | 
|  |     
    re:-1
    
    	Well, there's a decent shot in the Boston Herald that shows Justice
    not touching the bag as he rounds it.  The shot is from slightly above
    the thrid base line directly in line with the bag.  The bag is in the
    left of the photo and Justice is on the right side about a foot away
    while turning.  
    
    	To be honest, I didn't see the play, but from this picture, it
    is pretty clear that he didn't touch the bag and that the chalk dust
    people are talking about is from the line.
    
    							bill..g.
    
 | 
| 3.410 | Carnac The Umpire ??? | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Tue Oct 15 1991 12:42 | 27 | 
|  |  �   -on Dave Justice's failure to touch third after scoring on Mark Lemke's
 �   single:  "If you notice on replays, he went around third, held up and
 �   then broke.  He had a thought in his mind that he had missed third
 �   base.  That was the tipoff right there, when he stumbled, took a step
 �   back toward third and then broke for home"
 
 Hey, that's pretty nifty there.   Now we've got mind-reading umpires.  
 What's next ???   Mood interpretation ???   Dream weavers ???   Karma
 analysts ???   Biorhythm experts ???
 
 I can see it now ... 
 
 "Well, as he went into his stretch, his heart rate was way up, his EEG was
 all over the scale and his galvonic skin response indicators were pegging.  
 Coupled with the fact that he's a Gemini, it was a balk all the way.   No
 doubt about it."
 
 Over the lasted 20 years or so, the baseball umps have increasingly upped
 their media exposure and their public persona.    Whether it's
 controversial calls or public staredowns with players and managers, they
 feel a consistent but insecure need to make sure they're heard.   
 
 They won't do it but they need to just shut up and call the games.  They
 have all the authority on the field they're ever going to need or get. 
 Why can't that be enough for them ???
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.411 |  | PRAVDA::JACKSON | You run your mouth, I'll run my business brother | Tue Oct 15 1991 12:55 | 6 | 
|  | RE: .399
Yea, I was there for all three days in August against the Mets.  
-bill
 | 
| 3.412 |  | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Inthehotredlightofablack&white ROSESGROW | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:12 | 6 | 
|  | 
 What slays me about the call is that when you look at Alomar's supposed
 double play the other day when he spread-eagled the bag and the other
 automatics they give the defense that they could turn around and call
 that. I for one also thought he grazed the top of the bag....
 | 
| 3.413 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:25 | 4 | 
|  |     
    	A still photo has nothing on a slow motion replay....
    
    	Claybroon
 | 
| 3.414 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:54 | 6 | 
|  |     
    A slow motion replay has nothing on a split-second call on the field.
    
    Thank goodness baseball is still pure.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.415 | Braves got gyped, but also didn't help themselves | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Tue Oct 15 1991 13:54 | 9 | 
|  |     From the angle on the slow-mo replay I saw, it appear that Justice
    brushed the bag.
    
    That being said, failure to get anything across with bases loaded and
    none out in the second croaked the Braves just as much as any calls/
    noncalls....
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.416 | Braves should have won it in the second anyway | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:03 | 11 | 
|  |     BTW, Bonds double pumped because he saw Justice was at a point of
    indecision.  Justice had already stumbled by third and the third base
    coach was waving him home.  Justice, it seemed, feeling he had missed
    third faultered and thought about going back to the bag; that is when
    Bonds double pumped...why throw home when the runner isn't going?
    
    Bonds made a good throw (not excellent, just good) and it just happened
    to skip in there at the same time Justice did.  Slaught should have
    come up with it.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.417 | Bonds = scruitiny | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:09 | 6 | 
|  |     Bonds is getting a bum rap everytime he does something in the field. 
    Both throws he's made were more than adequate.  LaValliere makes BOTH
    plays.  Slaught just isn't quite as good.  People love to pick at Bonds
    because his attitude sucks.
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.418 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:12 | 9 | 
|  |     
    dan'l
    
    	I didn't mean to imply baseball needs instant replay.  I
    	hope they never institutue it.
    
    	Just pointing out a bad, easy to miss, bad call.........
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.419 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:23 | 5 | 
|  |     
    	Quote from the local rag:
    
    		"I know I touched it," Justice said.  "It's the
    		 only reason I kept going."
 | 
| 3.420 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 14:47 | 6 | 
|  |     FWIW, in USelessA TODAY the Braves' 3rd base coach is quoted as saying
    he thought Justice missed the bag.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.421 | Tomorrow... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:13 | 22 | 
|  |     OK, enough about whether Justice hit the bag, VanSlyke made the catch,
    Slaught should have come up with it, Cox should not have squeezed, etc.
    Game's over.  Pirates lead series 3-2 going back to cold Pittsburgh.
    A few Q's:
    	- Does anyone think Avery will pitch tomorrow as well has he did in
    	  game two?  Think the hamstring will knock Drabek out early?
    	- If the Pirates win this thing, who is your NLCS MVP?  No one
    	  has stood out for the Bucs.  Bell is hitting .400+, Lind leads
    	  in RBIs, Beuchel has had a good series.  If Avery does a number
    	  on Pittsburgh tomorrow night, but the Pirates win Thursday, it
    	  very well could be young Steve in a losing cause.
    	- If Bonds should get an extra base hit at some point tomorrow
    	  night, does anyone else besides me think he'll be unstoppable 
    	  after finally doing so?
    Go Bucs!
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.422 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:16 | 8 | 
|  |     	Sorry but Bonds throw was not good.  He was in very shallow
    left field and there is no way any other catcher could've made the
    play because the throw was to the first base side of the plate and
    got there just before Justice crossed the plate.  I for one think
    Bonds is the MVP in the National League this year, but the throw
    still sipped big time.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.423 | no score runs no can win | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Tue Oct 15 1991 15:30 | 8 | 
|  |     >     Does anyone think Avery will pitch tomorrow as well has he did in
    >	  game two?
    
    He very well might, but then one has to ask the question -- will the
    Braves score enough runs to make it not count for naught?
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.424 | whoopsy daisy | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Clarence Thomas for President | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:54 | 8 | 
|  |     >Thank goodness baseball is still pure.
    
    It's good to see you publicly confess that you consider plastic
    rugs in keeping with baseball's purity, dan'l.  Also, I look forward
    to your extolling this same purity when the Pirates send in their
    first Designated Geek against the Twins.
    
    MrT(wins Win!)
 | 
| 3.425 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:53 | 13 | 
|  |     "T"
    
    At least in baseball they don't stop after every play, even the obvious
    ones, and let some BOZO watch the play 35 times from 35 angles to see
    if it was called correctly.    I'll hate it when the "designated
    horrible defensive players" get to bat in place of the pitchers when
    the games are played in the HHH Metronome, but that's the rules,
    nomatter how assinine they be.
    
    The ManySordid Twinkies will fall in 6!!!take it to the bank.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.426 | Pirates have little to DH with | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Tue Oct 15 1991 18:07 | 5 | 
|  |     That brings up an interesting point.  If the Pirates do make it to the
    series, who will be the DH?  MacLendon, Varsho, or Wilkerson I suspect. 
    That's pretty scarey.  If the Braves go, Bream is the easy choice.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.427 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bear-sort of | Tue Oct 15 1991 19:23 | 11 | 
|  |     QUESTION:::
    
    Jim Leyland asked the league if he could use one roster(from the
    eligible pool) for the NCLS, and alter that roster if the Bucs made the
    World Series(presumably for the purpose of the designated lousy fielder
    or gimpy kneed player).  What did the league say about
    this???Approve-disapprove?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.428 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 15 1991 19:36 | 17 | 
|  |     
    Fess up, T.  The baseball atmosphere in Minnesota is as "impure" as it
    gets anywhere in the world.  Dome, turf, baggies, baffles, speakers-- 
    you name it, it's there-- *and* The Geek.  How cain you live with
    yourself?  
    
    On the umpire thing: it's just as much the umpire's responsibility to
    make sure that a player touches all the bases while traversing them 
    as making sure he's missed one.  Let's be honest:  Justice stumbles, 
    stretches out his big toe to just barely brush the bag, if even that 
    (and which *maybe* he felt but no mere human being was going to see), 
    rounds it, STOPS, and looks back, and the umpire is arrogant and 
    incompetent for calling him out?  Hey, you'll see at least one call 
    worse than that almost every time out...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.429 |  | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Wed Oct 16 1991 02:08 | 16 | 
|  | 
         It seems we have allot of questions as to if Justice touched the
    bag or not. In a still photograph it looks as if the bag was not
    touched but in a replay there is dust being kicked up. Not much dust
    though mind you. Personally even though I see the dust kick up a little
    bit I still do not see Justice's foot touch the bag. It brings me to
    this....if you were to have dust on the bag and sweep your hand across
    it at the same speed as Justice's foot was crossing the bag you would
    see dust fly. This is just my opinion and other people may differ but
    it may have just been the breeze from his foot causing dust to fly. In
    any case the Umpire was looking right at it and it is his call. It was
    just smart of Pittsburg to appeal at third.
                                                   Night Flier  ~~v~~
                                                
 | 
| 3.430 | PittsburgH | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Wed Oct 16 1991 08:16 | 11 | 
|  | >    just smart of Pittsburg to appeal at third.
    
    CBS had a great replay angle of Jay Bell trailing Justice and his eyes
    (best I can tell through his sun glasses) are focused right on
    Justice's feet.  Jay Bell is the one who made the appeal.
    
    Think about that for a second.  When you're playing softball and a
    batter hits the ball to the outfield, where are you looking?  Guess
    that's why the dudes in the majors get paid big buccos.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.432 | Humbled | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Wed Oct 16 1991 09:02 | 7 | 
|  |     Point well taken, Mark.  My point, however, was that it was hard for me
    to feel sorry for Helms.
    
    Two wrongs don't make a right.  Nor do hundreds.  Let's all be a little
    more sensative, me and T included.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.433 |  | WAYBAK::LEFEBVRE | She talks to angels | Wed Oct 16 1991 09:04 | 5 | 
|  |     Case closed.
    
    Thanks, Dan'l.
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.434 | glass houses, mud slinging, obscenity & Dan'l | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Clarence Thomas for President | Wed Oct 16 1991 10:52 | 13 | 
|  |     Speak for yourself, Dan'l.
    
    The single most offensive comment I've ever read in here was your
    distasteful, oppresive, obscene, pornographic, lurid, harrassing,
    embarrassing, humiliating, and unjust equation of AstroTurf with
    baseball purity.
    
    >How cain you live with yourself
    
    Easy, Waugamain: I don't say anything nice about the place, and only
    go there once a year (postseason excepted).
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.435 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Wed Oct 16 1991 11:05 | 18 | 
|  | >    embarrassing, humiliating, and unjust equation of AstroTurf with
>    baseball purity.
I wonder if the inner city youths that Willie Mays used to go play
baseball with after a Giants game ever thought their brand of
baseball any less pure because it was played on asphalt?
If the game brings pleasure, and the smiles, sweat, strain, concentration,
and joy are present in the players, then how is the game not pure?
Is the game not greater than the surface on which it played?  Is the
game not stronger than the attempts to fence it in and dome it?
The only abomination, IMO, to sully the game is the designated hitter.
'Saw
 | 
| 3.436 | Help | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | It's about time Richard! | Wed Oct 16 1991 22:02 | 6 | 
|  |     
    	Anyone got any news for us 2nd shifters?  Last I heard it was 0-0 in
    the 1st in.
    
    
    B.A.
 | 
| 3.437 | Avery & Drabek both tossing shutouts | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 23:07 | 10 | 
|  |     re: .-1
    
    The Braves are putting on one of the most enemic offensive displays
    ever seen in the history of playoff baseball.  They've now gone 26
    straight innings without scoring a run!
    
    0 - 0 going into the bottom of the eighth ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.438 |  | LUDWIG::GARRY | Go Irish | Wed Oct 16 1991 23:15 | 7 | 
|  |     Its 0-0 going to the top of the 9th.
    
    line score thru 8
    
             R  H  E
    Atlanta  0  6  0
    Pitts    0  3  0
 | 
| 3.439 | Smoltz vs. Smiley for all the marbles | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | HipDip skipped a beat. | Thu Oct 17 1991 01:30 | 20 | 
|  |        A classic game 6.
    
       Braves won it 1-0 in the top of the 9th.  Gregg Olson 
    singled down the 3rd base line to score Ron Gant for the 
    only run.  Braves sent in Pe�a and the Pirates sent in 
    Gary Varsho to PH for Drabek and he singled.  Redus sacrificed 
    him to second.  Jay Bell flied out, and Varsho advanced to 
    third on a wild pitch by Pe�a.  Van Slyke struck out looking
    at a change-up to end the game.  Can't help but wonder if
    the Braves would have walked Bonilla to get to Bonds had
    Van Slyke got on base?  
    
       Though neither Smoltz nor Smiley pitched particularly well 
    in Game 3, the advantage would have to be with the Bucs since   
    they're at home.  10 of Atlanta's 15 runs came in that game 3
    romp.     
    
       
    						 glen j.
    
 | 
| 3.440 | Braves bats will come alive tonight | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:17 | 15 | 
|  |     I just loved that pitchers' duel last night.  What an awesome display
    by two terrific arms.  Hard to believe that Drabek ends up with the L.
    
    I think the Pirates are done.  The team that won the NL East was not
    the team that lost in the ninth last night.  VanSlyke has been in a
    position to win three games and has struck out or grounded out in each
    instance.
    
    I'm teaching class tonight so I'll probably miss the first four innings
    or so.  I fully expect to return home with the Bucs in the hole by
    about five runs.  It's over.
    
    Freakin' Bonds.  Trade the chump tomorrow!
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.441 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:33 | 16 | 
|  |     I sat down for about the last 4 innings and saw some exciting baseball.  
    I don't follow baseball that much and am not a fan of either team (I'm
    pulling for the Braves though) but I was on the edge of my seat the last
    couple of innings.  Van Slyke sure extended the drama with all those
    foul balls he hit.  Gant should've caught that lead-off hit in the ninth,
    which looked more like an error.  That double play turned by the Braves 
    in the 6th was a thing of beauty.
    
    I don't think the Braves should've pinch-hit for Avery in the top of
    the 9th.  The guy had given up only 3 hits thru 8 innings and you've
    just broken on top by a run - why take a chance on changing pitchers? 
    Granted, they did have a runner in scoring position but in a tight game
    like this I think they should've left it up to Avery after they got the
    1-run lead.  
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.442 | This explains it.... | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:43 | 4 | 
|  |     I just read in the paper that Avery told Cox he requested to be
    pinch-hit for because he felt he was losing a little.  
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.443 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:49 | 8 | 
|  |     	What a magnificent game.  The only downer is that after watching
    the two best teams in baseball battle down to a deciding 7th game,
    the World Series against the "Spamball" champion will be such an
    anticlimactic event.  Although I picked the Braves to win, all I
    can say is bravo to both teams and good luck (although they shouldn't
    need it) to the winner in the Series.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.444 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:28 | 31 | 
|  |     Avery threw another masterpiece lasted night, no doubt about it.
    
    It still erks me to see a game end on a called strike!!!
    Van Slyke had battled Pen�, fouling off a slew of fastballs, and was
    probably looking for a fastball when Pen� goes and throws a bender.
    
    --dan'l,
    I wouldn't give up on the Bucs yet.  With Smoltz in there, Merced will
    be at first and Lavalliere will be behind the plate, and both are
    better hitters than their replacements against lefties.  Smiley had a
    bad outing in Atlanta, but I look for him to throw a good game tonight,
    and for Smoltz to get knocked around by the 6th inning.  
    
    I hope the Bucs take it tonight, 'cause if they lose, there's no
    telling how far they'll make it nexted year, with the team starting to
    get broken up after the season.
    
    Bonds is taking the art of "Sipping Indiscreetly" to a new level, with
    his performance in this series.
    
    One last thing, WHY, with Drabek throwing nothing but breaking balls in
    the ninth, wasn't Buechele playing closer to the line??????He must've
    been 10 feet off of the line, with Olsen sure to pull the breaking ball
    if he got the chance, which he did, and the rest was history.  Also,
    why didn't Leyland have Drabek throwing over to 1st to try to keep Gant
    closer???Was he afraid of an errant throw?????
    
    Ah sh!t, gotta sweat one out tonight!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.445 | A few points... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:44 | 15 | 
|  |     - Gotta agree with JaKe on where Buechele was stationed.
    
    - Drabek had struck Gant out, McCarver even said so, but the ump didn't
    give him the call and that ran the count full.  Bummer.
    
    - The strike to VanSlyke looked more like a ball than the
    aforementioned called ball that Drabek threw to Gant.
    
    - Bary Bonds can make up for everything tonight.  I can only hope he
    will.
    
    - Anyone notice the Pirates fans behind the plate last night doing the
    horizontal chop? 
    
    - Pittsburgh is a beautiful city.
 | 
| 3.446 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:59 | 23 | 
|  |     
    
    >>- Pittsburgh is a beautiful city.
    
    I am decidedly biased, BUT, I think that Pittsburgh at night, with all
    of the lights on, is one of the most beautiful cities I've ever seen.
    
    Anyone who has come into the city from the west at night, and come thru
    the Fort Pitt tunnels has to agree that the view upon exiting the
    tunnels is AWESOME.  Anybody who visits the city, MAKE SURE for the
    BEST view, go to the West End Overlook.
    
    >>- The strike to VanSlyke looked more like a ball than the
    >> aforementioned called ball that Drabek threw to Gant.
    
    I agree, BUT, Whether Van SLyke was fooled on the pitch or not, it was
    a close enuf pitch that Van Slyke should've made an attempt, even if it
    was feeble, at trying to foul the thing off.  It pisses me off to see
    someone watch strike 3 go by, ending the game, with the tying run on 
    third!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.447 | Great Great Game !!! | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:34 | 36 | 
|  |  What a great game !!!   Filled with so many tiny events that were
 absolutely titanic in scope.   Baseball at its exquisite finest.
 
 Lonnie Smith slides ever so slightly past second base on a steal attempt
 and is tagged out.    Makes up for it a few innings later with a perfect
 throw to cut down a shocked Don Slaught.
 
 Tim McCarver sets up the situation perfectly by insisting that Gery Redus
 will *not* ground into a double play because a) he hasn't done so all year
 long and b) Avery is throwing high in the strike zone.    
 
 Whap ... grounder to Bream and he and Belliard turn one of the most
 beautiful double plays you will *ever* see.    The 3-6-3 DP is an
 extremely tough one to pull off and those two ex-Pirates did it
 beautifully.   Noticed that McCarver didn't chew any crow on his setup,
 though.  He should have.
 
 Ron Gant steals 2nd in the top of the ninth.   He does *not* score on
 Olson's hit if he had stayed at first.   "Little ball" at its best.
 
 Pena throws his only off-speed toss of the night on the final pitch and
 Van Slyke is totally frozen.  Even Froemming's punch out call was
 off-speed so even the ump was fooled by it.    Beautiful pitch.   What
 pitching is all about.   Work fast, throw strikes, change speeds.
 
 And, Chris, even though the Braves were held scoreless for all those
 innings, they kept plugging.   I remember sitting through the Phillies
 1980 NLCS with Houston.   The Phils went thru an 18 inning drought and I
 must have tossed in a dozen towels in defeat.   Yet they kept on plugging.
 
 Braves are in great shape.   They'll be flying high tonight and the Bucs
 are going to have to regroup a bit.   They gotta be mumbling to
 themselves.   This will easily be the most important and biggest baseball
 game in Atlanta Braves history.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.448 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:56 | 15 | 
|  |     
>>and is tagged out.    Makes up for it a few innings later with a perfect
>> throw to cut down a shocked Don Slaught.
 
    Another gripe on my part, Slaught was a dead duck at second.  I know
    it's a split second decision on his part, but the ball wasn't really
    the type that you get a doble out of.  The ball was hit hard, and not
    that far to the left of Smith, plus Slaught doesn't have blazing speed.
    
    Belliard had an almost identical hit, and Belliard has good speed,
    later in the game and when he saw Bonds come up with the ballo, he put
    the brakes on BIG TIME.  Slaught, IMHO, should have done the same.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.449 | Pre-programmed decision ??? | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:04 | 15 | 
|  |  �   Another gripe on my part, Slaught was a dead duck at second.  I know
 �   it's a split second decision on his part, but the ball wasn't really
 �   the type that you get a doble out of.  The ball was hit hard, and not
 �   that far to the left of Smith, plus Slaught doesn't have blazing speed.
 
 But Lonnie Smith *did* have to go his left, plant and throw back across
 his body to 2nd base.  Smith's arm has never been that good plus he's
 notorious ("Skates") for losing his footing in the outfield and on the
 basepaths.
 
 Slaught probably went because the Bucs' scouting report said to go in that
 situation.   The scouting report was probably a good one.  Smith made a
 great throw and the scouting report is now toast ... 
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.450 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:26 | 7 | 
|  |     	Does anyone remember this kind of banter (questioning baserunning
    decisions and managerial strategies) happening during the SLCS
    (Spamball League Championship Series)?  I mean other than Cito starting
    the SLCS with his third best pitcher (but hey after not making
    decisions all year long it's tough to start).
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.451 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:37 | 45 | 
|  |     
    
    	Great game, but these are not the Pirates I've grown up with who
    were always refered to as "the Lumber Co.".  These guys are more like
    the Slumber Co.!  I've never seen such a pathetic lack of offense
    as the Pirates have shown over these 6 games.  The big 3 B's have 
    pretty much stunk up the joint while the minor B's have picked up
    most of the slack.  I've also never seen so many hitters (Pirates)
    swinging at the first pitch.  Almost every batter does this and 
    ends up being in the hole after 2 pitches..  
    
    	No excuse for Van Slyke watching the last pitch.  Anything close
    and you gotta protect the plate!  Amazing that these guys that are
    making 4 mil a year can't seem to remember basic baseball fundamentals!
    
    	As for the run scoring double, Buchelle(sp) or the managers should
    be hung out to dry.  I played 16 years of organized baseball at 3rd
    base and given the same situation, I would of been standing on top of
    the line!  Give up the hole between short and third because you have
    a great arm in left and the runner might not score on a single in the
    hole.  But if the ball gets down the line, it's a sure double, and
    sure enough, Buchelle was to far off the line!  What's even more
    curious is that the announcers didn't even persue that line of thinking
    after they continually analyze every other play to death.
    
    	Given the situation in the 9th of a close ballgame, I would protect
    the corners to the strong side of the batter.  At least that is what
    I was always taught!  If Bushelle was on the line, Atlanta wouldn't
    of scored and the outcome might of been different.  Bushelle has been
    touted as having a great glove, but all I've seen him do in this 
    series is cost the Pirates two games with mental "errors".
    
    	At this point, I don't even care if the Pirates make it or not.
    This is not the same type of Pirate team I grew up with or identify
    with.  There is no team leader and no offensive power.  That's not
    taking anything away from the Atlanta pitchers because they have
    pitched awfully well, but I think the Pirates are making them all look
    invincible.
    
    	I'm surprised that on one has used the big "C" word yet...but there
    still is time!
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
 | 
| 3.452 | glimpse at the future | NOVA::SIMON |  | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:41 | 4 | 
|  |     Hey, at least we know how the Pirates will be in NLCS after Bonds and
    Bonilla eventually leave.  Getting there might be another story, but
    you could have a 50-year old Matty Alou out there and it wouldn't make
    much difference, at least in the offensive categories.
 | 
| 3.453 | More ... | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:49 | 28 | 
|  |   �  	No excuse for Van Slyke watching the last pitch.  Anything close
  �  and you gotta protect the plate!  Amazing that these guys that are
  �  making 4 mil a year can't seem to remember basic baseball fundamentals!
    
    Pena hung Van Slyke out to dry on that lasted pitch.   Completely
    fooled him.   That's the only explanation that makes sense especially
    since he was obviously in a mood to swing to protect the plate on the
    dozen or so two-strike foul balls that he had already hacked prior to
    that outstanding off-speeder.   
    
    Pena got him.  One memory of my high school days as a catcher came
    flooding back to me after that pitch.   We had a pitcher who threw some
    serious smoke and that's all he was doing in this one particular game. 
    Came down to their lasted out and their stud hitter was up.   He knew
    that he was going to see all fastballs and he kept fouling them off
    looking for the perfect one.
    
    After about 10 or so foul balls, I threw down the "3" sign and my
    pitcher didn't nod "Yes" nor did he shake "No".   He just smiled this
    great Cheshire cat smile and we fanned him on the s-l-o-w change.  
    Stee-rike thuh-ree.   Ballgame.   Loved it.
    
    Your Buechele argument is tough to refute, however.  Gotta guard that
    line in the late innings.  Redus had done so on Justice's grounder to
    first to lead off the inning ... Buechele should have done the same
    over on his side of the field.
    
    Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.454 | Bottom line: Gant's steal of 2nd was *HUGE* | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 17 1991 13:20 | 16 | 
|  |     re: Buechele
    
    I cain see both sides to this argument.  Normally you'd definitely be
    guarding the line in the late innings (though some managers no longer
    subscribe to this 'conventional wisdom') but in this case there's a
    runner in scoring position with terrific speed.  It's highly doubtful
    that Bonds is gonna throw out Gant on a single between short and third.
    
    On the other hand Greg Olsen absolutely makes a living pulling the ball
    down the 3rd baseline.  I've seen him do it countless times, and I'd of
    thought the scouting report would show this.  Still, I suspect Leyland
    was 'playing by the book' by NOT guarding the line, since a single is
    most likely gonna score the runner.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.455 | And another beef... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Thu Oct 17 1991 13:25 | 5 | 
|  |     Avery pitched a great game, but I got a little tired of both announcers
    gushing over him.  Drabek was doing just as well and I didn't hear half
    the orgasmic compliments they were dribbling on young Steve.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.456 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Thu Oct 17 1991 13:47 | 14 | 
|  | 
I wouldn't BLAM Van Slyke at all for getting caught looking. Pena threw the
perfect pitch at the perfect time. You gotta give whomever called that pitch
some credit. Van Slyke was sitting on and hammering the fastballs (but foul).
There was no way he could recover enough to even try and pull the trigger on
that pitch.....it was a beauty....
Methinks you Buc's fans are a little sensitive after staying up too late last 
night..btw, I'm rooting for the Buc's also...
I just hope we get as good a game tonight as we got last night....
Metz
 | 
| 3.457 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:49 | 15 | 
|  |     re .455:
    
    > Avery pitched a great game, but I got a little tired of both announcers
    > gushing over him.  Drabek was doing just as well and I didn't hear half
    > the orgasmic compliments they were dribbling on young Steve.
    
    Even as one rooting for the Braves, I have to agree 100% Dan'l.
    
    If Atlanta takes Game 7 it's going to be a house divided at my
    place, as my wife who's originally from "Meffa" will surely be rooting 
    for Pags and the Twins.
    
    
    py
                           
 | 
| 3.458 | Great baseball... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:55 | 41 | 
|  |                                                                  
    And they say that ACChris is only a bandwagon baseball fan.  Could have 
    fooled me with that absolutely correct analysis of Buechele's positioning 
    in the ninth.  There is no "book" on guarding the lines with a man on 
    second and *two outs*.  *Any* outfield hit will score Gant; I don't care
    who's out there.  So the decision rests with the batter and the pitch,
    which in this case was a fastball, not a curve.  In his previous
    at-bat, in a similar situation on the same pitch, Olson hit a ground ball 
    to *short* (the play where Bell nailed Gant at the plate).  I really
    can't come to the conclusion that Leyland or Buechele made the wrong
    decision, except of course with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight.
    
    The same thing goes with Van Slyke's strikeout.  It's not like the guy
    just choked on the first two-strike pitch that he saw.  He fouled
    several good fastballs off, most of them hard hit, before Pena just
    absolutely fooled him.  You can't blame the batter there, not after
    that kind of a tough at-bat.  Sure, maybe he could have just waved at 
    the thing and been all the way around on his swing before the ball
    reached the plate, but then today we'd all be saying what a dummy he 
    was for swinging at an unhittable ball that might have been out of the
    strike zone.  You got to give credit where it's due.  That was a
    *great* pitch...
    
    I, too, was surprised that Drabek didn't throw over to first on Gant in
    the ninth.  McCarver kept speculating on the pitchout, but fearing that 
    it would cause Drabek to lose the batter, I didn't like that idea
    (which the Bucs promptly executed anyway, putting Drabek behind 2-0 and
    giving Gant a guaranteed pitch count to steal on).  All he needed to do 
    was to keep him a little honest.  I haven't seen that much of Drabek 
    this season.  Is he one of those guys that has a mortal fear of throwing 
    to the bases or something?
    
    One last thing.  While I won't question his positioning, has Steve
    Buechele *cleanly* fielded a hard-hit ball since he's come over to the
    artificial turf fields of the NL?  Okay, so he looks good with his 
    dives, but can he actually *catch* a ball on the funny stuff without
    backing up on it or otherwise letting the ball play him?  This guy was
    supposedly the top Gold Glove candidate in the AL when he was traded...
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.459 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:58 | 20 | 
|  |     Over lunch, another flaw in Leyland's "strategic" workings occured to
    me.  It was the ninth inning, Gant was on second with two outs, after
    leading the inning off with a walk and swiping second.
    
    Now, Olsen is batting 7th, right.  For the series to that point, he's
    hitting somewhere around .350, with 3 RBI.  Raphael Belliard, who
    couldn't hit the ball over the fence from 2nd base, and who couldn't
    pull the ball it it was sitting on a batting T, is in deck.  Raphael
    was hitting an anemic .154(which BTW was higher that Barry Bonds'
    avg., and first base was open.
    
    Why the fluffin hay didn't they walk Olsen and set up an "any base"
    force with Belliard up next?????????????????
    
    SAheez, you sit long enuf and think about the game for long enuf, you
    cain find all of the flaws.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.460 | Manager not always right/wrong cuz something worked/didn't *once* | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:16 | 22 | 
|  |     
    > Why the fluffin hay didn't they walk Olsen and set up an "any base"
    > force with Belliard up next?????????????????
    
    Probably wouldn't have hurt any, but you wouldn't have seen Belliard. 
    You'd get a pinch-hitter, one (Hunter?) who by the percentages, at
    least, is a better hitter than Olson.  If the Braves' manager is
    content to leave his .240-hitting righthanded catcher out there against
    my righthanded pitcher, I can probably live with that.
    
    I'm not just trying to stick up for Jimmy Leyland at all costs here.  I 
    think he's made some strange decisions that have both worked and
    failed.  Letting Roger Mason hit the other day was pretty bizarre, but
    it worked (barely).  I also thought he should have had Espy in there as
    a pinch-runner when Varsho singled to lead off the inning, had Merced
    looking at a few pitches from the occasionally wild Pena and then had
    Espy stealing.  The way the Bucs were going, that first out in the ninth
    was too valuable to give away without at least a fight from Merced, who 
    has a very good eye, not with speed on the bench, at least...
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.461 | ACC Chris Knows Baseball! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:17 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.462 | I like Minny In the series | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:18 | 6 | 
|  |     
     Obviously a sign of a deeply flawed team...!!!...
    
    		GO BRAVES !!
    
    			Big Game
 | 
| 3.463 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:31 | 19 | 
|  |     Although I PRAY that the Bucs win this thing tonite, even if they lose,
    I feel that, at least for me, this has been one of the most exciting
    LCS's, whether NL or AL, that I've seen in many years.  3 1-0 games and
    a 3-2 game, with a 10-3 shellaquing and a 5-1 Bucco pounding thrown in
    for good measure.
    
    Although I don't expect a high scoring event tonite, it would be nice
    to not have another nail biter and have the Bucs bat around inn the 1st
    inning(wishful thinking).
    
    Wasn't it just a year ago when the Braves fans were saying "Go Braves,
    and take the Falcons with you"????
    
    
    GGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
    BBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.464 |  | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:50 | 20 | 
|  |   I grew up in Pittsburgh and remember Mazeroski's homer to win the 60
  series. I never enjoyed watching a player more than Clemente and he
  certainly lived up to his reputation in the 71 series. In 79, the team
  was tight and adopted the song "We are Family". In all of those years
  they seemed to have something special going for them. Now in 91, the
  Bucs probably have the best talent for one team in all of baseball. But
  at the same time, you have a couple of so-called stars talking about 
  leaving the team at the end of the year and for the most part, the talented 
  stars are not producing. This is in sharp contrast to the leadership of
  people like Clemente and Pops Stargell and the "We are Family" attitude
  of the past. I hope the Bucs pull this one out but something in the back
  of my mind doesn't have the confidence that I had in 60,71 and 79.
  With that said, I think Doug Drabek, Jay Bell(offense and defence) and 
  Zane Smith are rising to the occasion and having a terrific NLCS.
  Go Bucs !! If they win tonight, I just wish the gunner was around to hear him
  say "We had em all the way".
					Keith
 | 
| 3.465 |  | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R |  | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:37 | 9 | 
|  | 	I have to agree with Glenn and Chris that Buechele was positioned
	properly on the Olson double.  As Glenn mentioned, Olson had hit
	that same pitch to the shortstop's left just 2 innings earlier, and
	was much more likely to hit it through the hole than down the line.
	On Drabek's "decision" to not throw to first, what I have heard
	since is that this was the type of move that the hamstring problem
	was preventing him from making smoothly, and comfortably.  Perhaps
	he feared aggravating the problem.
 | 
| 3.466 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Clarence Thomas for President | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:50 | 13 | 
|  |     If the Aspirates lose tonite (and I hope they don't, cuz we 'Sotans
    up here are licking our chops hungering for Pittsburgh Title-meat
    to sink our teeth into) then they too will be rightfully branded
    chokemasters just like the Blue Jays.
    
    If this comes to pass, then why not a ChokeBowl between Pitssburugh
    and Toronto?  Be kinda like those consolation games they used to have
    at the Final Four.
    
    Reason?  So one a them could finally learn how to win a Final, albeit
    a penultimate one...
    
    MrT(wins!)
 | 
| 3.467 |  | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:14 | 12 | 
|  |     "T(winkiesonthebrain)", 
    
    go wait in the truck!!!
    
    I don't see where the "C" word can be used for either team in the NLCS,
    regardless of who wins.  
    
    Throw out the 5-1 and 10-3 games and both teams have scored only 4
    runs each in the other 4 games.  Pitching has prevailed in the series,
    not lay down and die type baseball like the Blown-Jays played.
    
    JaKe
 | 
| 3.468 | Sure, it'd be a choke, but that's not what 'Sotans see... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:25 | 37 | 
|  | 
   >  If the Aspirates lose tonite (and I hope they don't, cuz we 'Sotans
   >  up here are licking our chops hungering for Pittsburgh Title-meat
   >  to sink our teeth into
    
    Ha!  From today's USelessA (tm) Today:
    
    "On the way out of Minnesota last week, the taxi driver was musing
    about the prospects of his Twins being in the World Series, and who
    they might face.
       
    Even though there were only two possibilities, he spoke of his
    choice with great conviction.
    
    'Anybody but Pittsburgh,' he said.  'Nobody in Minnesota wants to
    see Pittsburgh again.'"
    
    (Seems that not *all* Minnesotans share the optimism of this one 
    transplanted hypocrite.)
     
    > If this comes to pass, then why not a ChokeBowl between Pitssburugh
    > and Toronto?  Be kinda like those consolation games they used to have
    > at the Final Four.
    
    > Reason?  So one a them could finally learn how to win a Final, albeit
    > a penultimate one...
    
    You better hope this transpires for the Twins' sake, what with the 
    Pirates' outstanding record for coming through in the clutch in the 
    "Finals" of 1960, 1971, and 1979 (underdog teams all, no less...).
    
    MrT, how do you reconcile your current fanaticism for the Twins with
    all of the crap you've been dumping on the woeful "Twinkies" of the 
    past few years?  Who's next in line, the Golden Goofs? 
    
    glenn
            
 | 
| 3.469 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:28 | 5 | 
|  |     	MorT, the National League Champion is going the wipe the floor
    of the HubertHoratioHornblowerDome with the Spamball chumps.  To
    bad you wasn't a bettin' main.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.470 |  | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Fri Oct 18 1991 06:54 | 9 | 
|  |     Wow, love them Braves!!!  They are my current favorite team, tied for
    first with them Twins!
    
    Go Braves.  Go Twins.  
    
    
    :*)
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.471 | When do the hockey playoffs begin... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 07:45 | 26 | 
|  |     Well, it's over.  What can you say?  Am I disappointed?  Yes, but not
    as much as I thought I would be and I think that has something to do
    with spending the past week engrossed in perhaps the greatest LCS in a
    long long time.  What great baseball.  After this, the WS is bound to
    be anticlimactic.  And I'm happy for the people of Atlanta.
    Bonilla is through as a Pirate.  It is my opinion that the Pirates
    should wait to see who Bonilla goes to and send Bonds to the same team
    in a trade for players who have conviction.  It would be ashame to
    split the choke brothers up.  What was that Bonds said at the beginning
    of the summer when the front office wouldn't increase the offer to
    Bonnilla: "If they want a championship in Pittsburgh, they're going to
    have to pay for it."
    
    The Pirates could be back in the playoffs next year if they still had
    Wes Chamberlin to take Bonilla's place.  Thanks, Larry Doughty.
    Frankly, I'd like to see a VanSlyke-led team finish 4th in the division
    next season than to put up with Bonds for one more year.  He doesn't
    deserve the good people of Pittsburgh and I bet there are many waking
    up there this morning saying just that.  
    With all the free agents, you won't even recognize the men in Pirate
    uniforms next year unless you've recently seen the Buffalo Bisons play.
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.472 | I may even watch some of the WS now | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS |  | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:39 | 9 | 
|  |     Well I dont watch much baseball, I watched 2 games, game 5 when the
    Braves missed the 3rd base bag (more or less giving Pitt the win) and
    them last nights game, I watch to the bitter end.  How about that
    rookie hunter.......Loved his double pumping fists on that RBI double.
    
    Go Braves and Take the Falcons with you...Maybe them meant Go to the
    World Series Braves and take the Falcons to the SuperBowl with you :-)
    
    
 | 
| 3.473 | Go Bonds Go, and take Bonilla wif ya | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:45 | 14 | 
|  |     Van Slyke bit the bullet and admitted the Pirates have plenty to answer
    for over the winter. He in effect admitted that the Pirates as a team
    simplty have underachieved the past two years. And dan'l, you're
    correct. Bonilla and Bonds just might not git all the money from other
    clubs that they are lookin' fer.
    Got to gave the Braves' pitching credit. Two shutouts in Pittsburgh.
    Wish we had Avery and Smoltz.
    
    Did I see/hear correctly? Were there quite a few no shows at Trois
    Rivieres?  Quite a loud Brave contingent in the upper deck in right
    field.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.474 | Some (weak) explanations... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:58 | 23 | 
|  |     They weren't no shows.  The game wasn't sold out.  A chance to see your
    home team take the pennant and there's not a sell out?  Unbelievable.
    
    Course, maybe these few thousand were just fed up with paying Bonds'
    sallary and having him grasp throat, open mouth, and insert finger.
    
    Talked to my dad over the weekend and he said that the city of
    Pittsburgh is taking some big heat for the way it treated the fans. 
    This mainly stems from parking fiascos.  TRS used to have adequate (at
    best) parking.  This season, they took away about 5,000 spaces to build
    a science center on the river.  
    
    Well, during the first two game sellouts, there was a great lack of
    spaces and people began parking anywhere and everywhere.  Instead of
    just letting a tense situation be, during the first two games, the city
    of Pittsburgh towed over 200 cars.
    
    Way to go, mayor Sophie.  Everyone pisses and moans about the low
    attendance and then when you get a great crowd you treat them like
    crap.  Doubt if I'd have gone to last night's game either fearing my
    car would end up in the city impound.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.475 | disappointing, damaging, sickening, revulsive | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Clarence Thomas for President | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:03 | 18 | 
|  |     So now it's the Mayor's fault?  
    
    I suspected all along that the alleged snafu surrounding last 
    year's empty seats was a Trick Dick Nixon-style cover story, and
    now I know it.
    
    As a Americain I am ashamed for our National Pasttime.  As a baseball
    fan I am angry.  There was talk a few years ago about getting baseball
    out of Pittsburgh, and I wonder whether Fay Vincent, staring in shock
    at all those empty seats at a NLCS game seven, rues the decision to
    save the Pittsburgh Pirates.  
    
    It's time to face up to the fack that Pittsburgh is not a quality 
    baseball town and to get the franchise moved to a more deserving city,
    such as Indianapolis or Charlotte or Salt Lake or Portland or wherever -
    anywhere but Pittsburgh.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.476 | Gotta admit, I was *shocked* | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:24 | 10 | 
|  |     I know I've spoken out against high ticket prices and management
    ineptitude in the past in order to support fans staying away away from
    the ballpark, but to fail to sellout the 7th game of the playoffs (when
    other games *HAD* sold out) is pathetic.
    
    It's almost as if the fans gave up on the Pirates after the 6th game
    ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.477 |  | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:32 | 51 | 
|  |     >><<< Note 3.475 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Clarence Thomas for President" >>>
    >>           -< disappointing, damaging, sickening, revulsive >-
    
    And that's just when you look in the mirror each morning!!!  (8^/\*
    
    Re  Pgh not a good baseball town.  Propel it through your southern end,
    "T".  2mil + attendance.
    
    Although, when CBS first came on lasted night, I couldn't believe the
    empty seats.  Here I am in Colorado for the4 lasted 4 weeks, not a
    chance of going to see ANY of the playoff games, and there's a bunch of
    empty seats at 3 Rivers.
    
    Got tired of Jack Buck and Tim McCarver lasted night.  Every time
    Bonilla's face popoped up on the tube, Buck tries to get melodramatic
    and spews,"Could this be Bonilla's last game as a Pirate?".  Musta
    heard it 10 times lasted night.  
    
    Also got tired of seeing hunter's HR from every angle except thru
    Smiley's a$$hole, where CBS would've had a camera if they could've put
    it there.
    
    Re somewhere back in thiis note, Zane Smith is truly the starting
    pitcher for the all-ugly team, and Brian Hunter, IMHO, wins the
    starting job at first.
    
    Lessee, Braves .vs.  Twinkies in the WORLD SERIES.  Hah, I couldn't
    give 2 SLOF's who wins this thing, although I would rather that the
    Braves do, cause they're the only good team in the Series.
    
    Doubt seriously if I'll get to see a game of the series, or really want
    to see one.
    
    The Bucs "big 3" set the tone early lasted night, when both Orlando
    Merced and Jay Bell got on in the bottom of the first.  Andy Van Slyke
    had the best shot of the nexted three, and was out on a ball that
    looked gone off of the bat.  Bonilla and Bonds feebly ended the first
    inning.
    
    Those three, Slyke, Bonilla and Bonds batted .333 in the NLCS with
    nobody on base, but when it counted, and there were runs to be driven
    in, they batted a horrendous .077.
        
    Ah well, now to watching the Steelers fumble up and down the field, and
    watching the Penguins repeat as Stanley Cup champs.
    
    dissapointedly
    
    JaKe
    
    
 | 
| 3.478 | Atlanta fans in Three Rivers | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:47 | 25 | 
|  |  �   Did I see/hear correctly? Were there quite a few no shows at Trois
 �   Rivieres?  Quite a loud Brave contingent in the upper deck in right
 �   field.
 
 I got some inside info on this.   Spoke to my sister who works for Delta
 and lives in Atlanta.    Late yesterday morning, Delta announced that they
 would fly three chartered jets to Pittsburgh for Braves fans who wanted to
 see Game 7.    This was in addition to Delta's regular daily flights to
 Pittsburgh which, presumably, were already full.
 
 The three extra charters filled up so fast that Delta added a fourth
 charter in mid-afternoon and that one filled up, too.   So, at least four
 full planeloads of Braves fans were in Three Rivers lasted night.   They
 all walked up and bought tickets at the door and then did their Chop thing
 all night long.
 
 They were all back in Atlanta around 2:00am this morning.
 
 Congratulations to the Braves.   Superb pitching.   Feel bad for Bucs'
 fans but the Series matchup is really sweet with both "worst-to-first"
 teams in there.
 
 1992 World Series - Cleveland vs Montreal.    You heard it here first.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.479 |  | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:16 | 74 | 
|  |     I can't help but wonder what affect the empty seats at Three River may
    have had on the Pirate players lasted night.
    
    Biggest game, in way of importance, of the year.  Win you go to the big
    show, lose, and the best Pirate team in the lasted 11 years is but a
    memory, forever.  And the fans fail to show.  
    
    The Pirates left port lasted night but forgot to put the sails on the
    boat.  I can't help but think of the unused potential this team brought
    to the NLCS. They had Gold loves in left field and center field.  They
    wore the label as the best defensive outfield in the NL, if not the
    whole game.  Their outfielders combined for 300 RBI this year, but
    couldn't put any that meant much across in the NLCS.
    
    Some will say the Pirates choked, others will say they just met up with
    terrific pitching.  Personally, I say it was a combination of the two.
    
    Barry Bonds ends the season second in the NL in RBI, but can't put a
    SINGLE rbi to his credit in the NLCS.  In the first, with two outs and
    runners on first and third, he fails.  Later, with nobody on, he slams
    a ball into the left field corner for a double.  Oh, but for that hit
    coming in the 1st inning.  
    
    The whole complection of the game was set when the Bucs left those two
    leadoff hits go to waste in the first.  The never threatened
    afterwards.
    
    John Smoltz pitched a good game.  He had a crutch there, his
    "PERSONAL" psychologist.   How Thweet!!
    
    Can't help but wonder if Barry Bonds has his personal Proctologist
    attend every NLCS game, he hits like such an a$$hole.
    
    I feel disappointed this AM, but also angry that the team that was the
    best in the Majors this year during the regualr season, can only score
    12 runs in 7 games, and had so many hitters going for the fences
    instead of just trying to hit the freakin ball.
    
    I'd say, "Wait til nexted year", BUT, this was the lasted chance for
    this "team".  This winter, the team will be decimated by free agency,
    and, as --dan'l wrote earlier, they MAY finish fourth nexted year.
    
    Larry Doughty, Bucs GM, let a couple of prime prospects get away, some
    to satisfy the present, and others thru assinine mistakes.  
    
    The Pirates don't have the revenue to pay the BIG bucks.  The market
    they are in is too small.  There are no multi-million dollar TV deals
    like the NY and LA teams worked out.   Fielding a mediocre team will
    only hasten teh removal of baseball from Pittsburgh.  Ah well, at
    least maybe they'll end up with a minor league team a few years after
    the BUcs leave.  Not saying that the BUCS wil leave for sure, but
    without remaining a contender, and exciting team, and without some sort
    of revenue sharing thruout the league, the BUCS will not be able to
    survive financially over the nexted few years, and will sell to new
    owners, and move to a larger market.
    
    There was talk on ESPN that Bonilla could be baseball's first "SIX
    MILLION DOLLAR MAN".  Salaries for playing a FREAKIN GAME are getting
    tottally out of hand, IMHO.  No wonder it costs so freakin much for a
    family to go to a game.  Food and beverages, plus souvenirs are priced
    sky high, 'cause the team takes a cut out of each, and must pay the
    huge salaries if they wish to remain competitive.
                                                               
    Not to say it's the players' fault either, it's a combination of both
    the management and the players.  Greed, Greed, Greed.
    
    I ask, is anybody really worth 4 million, 5 million, or more PER year
    fro playing a GAME, just a freaking GAME.  But I guess that's
    entertainment.
    
    Enuf for now
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.480 |  | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | Save Waldo Canyon | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:27 | 10 | 
|  |   Jake, I feel exactly like you do. I remember when you could get a seat
  in the left field bleachers at Forbes field for 50 cents and watch player's
  like Mazeroski, Clemente, Smokey Burgess etc. and you would never hear
  a complaint about their salaries.
  I would be a real shame if the Pirates left Pittsburgh. They've been there
  for what, 80 years or so, and have one of the best baseball histories in the
  game. 
				Keith
 | 
| 3.482 | Ticket money doesn't come close to paying the salaries | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:39 | 4 | 
|  |     And coffee used to be 5� a cup, and a movie ticket was $1, and, and and
    
    When you look at the money CBS paid to MLB to televise a handful of
    games, you can I understand why the players are demanding more money.
 | 
| 3.483 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Help, Set Lee's Profile | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:04 | 17 | 
|  |     Mac -
    
    I understand your arguement - but I do feel that salaries are way out
    of hand.  There's as much talk about salaries and free agency and
    collusion and agents and demands are there is about fungo's and hitting
    and pitching and fielding.
    
    I wish baseball would have a salary cap or something.  
    
    And what happens if CBS, which LOST a ton of money on the contract,
    doesn't sign back up for the big bucks?  Do the players lower demands?
    Not in my lifetime.  
    
    But, there will be no end.  I won't be long til the 10 million dollar
    contract (yearly...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.484 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:04 | 71 | 
|  |     IMHO, salaries on the Major leagues should be on a scale.
    
    Set up a base pay of say, $250k for a first year player.
    2nd year player $350k, 3rd year 450K, ans so on.
    
    Then add the incentives.  Hit 5 homers, get an extra $50k.
    10 homers, $100K, etc.  
    Less than 5 errors, extra bucks, make the defensive scale go on
    chances/errors made percentage.
    
    Hit over .250, extra bucks scaled up all the way to winning the batting
    title.
    
    Money for RBI's, money for pitchers wins, saves, etc.
    
    Then, when a palyer has a good year, he gets paid for having a good
    year, when he has a bad year, he doesn't still get paid for failures.
    
    Now, I can see all of the arguments from younzes, Windfall profits for
    the owners, blah blah blah.
    
    The owners would be permnitted a certain profit margin, with the rest
    of the money going to either pension fund or a new "get a real life, do
    something worthwhile with your life" re-education plan which would help
    the players who can't count as high as their salaries, or tie their own
    shoes, learn a "valuable" skill, like basketweaving, to keep them from
    starving for the rest of their lives.
    
    I guess I'm sounding bitter, well I guess I am bitter.
    
    I'm just tired of the way sports has gravitated from what was once
    "fun" to nothing but chasing the almighty dollar.  I'm bitter about the
    fact that if I want to go to a game, and take my family, I gotta shell
    out a major portion of a days wages for tickets, parking, food,
    souvenirs for the younguns, etc.  And who do I get to watch????
    A bunch of players, who were gifted with some athletic ability, and a
    few breaks in life, who are making mor in a week than I can ever hope
    to make in 2 or 3 years, PLAYING A GAME!!!!
    
    And what'll they do this winter, charge money for their autographs,
    like they really need the dough.  The owners will raise ticket prices
    again, bleed the f#$%ing public, cause they have to pay the exhorbitant
    salaries, etc.
    
    CBS shells out over a billion dollars for baseball, and they're losing
    their shirts on the deal.  The NLCS and ALCS ratings were sewage.  And
    you know what, I feell sort of glad that the ratings are shit.  There's
    a helluva lot more things I can spend my money on that are more
    worthwhile than watching sports at the ballpark.  There are people
    starving in this country because they're out of work and can't find a
    job, but the professional athlete thinks he's so important, he's worht
    millions of dollars per year.
    
    Don't get me wrong, if I were in the league, I'd go after all the
    money I could get to make myself financially independent for life, but 
    I just get tired of hearing how much these bozos are making for playing
    a game when there are som many other problems in the world that are
    worthwhile.
                             
    When pro sports eventually goes exclusively pay per view, then my
    watching of sports will be finished.
    
    I have in the past, had season tickets to the Pitt Panthers football
    games, and will be buying them again nexted year, at least there, I'm
    not seeing athletes whose minds are cluttered thinking about the
    salaries they're receiving, YET!!
    
    Peaved
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.485 |  | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:17 | 27 | 
|  |     Hail, I can remember when ballplayers had off-season jobs!  Selling
    cars, beer, etc.
    
    Know what?  There was an incentive back then for players to win the
    pennant and WS.  It was called MONEY!  LOTS of MONEY, compared to what
    their salaries were.  Which were still pretty good compared to the
    working man.
    
    Nowadays, it's basically loose change for many players.
    
    What really bugs me is that I have no say in this unbelievable
    escalation of salaries in sports.  It doesn't matter if I watch or
    listen to the game, or attend.  The dough is offered by TV and radio
    stations.  They, in turn, charge their sponsors, who are only to happy
    to have a spot during a game.  They, in turn, whack us, the poor
    consumer who may or may not know what the hell the tomahawk chop is.
    
    That's what bugs me, Bunky.  Now, it's been described as entertainment. 
    But, I can elect to either go to a concert or movie if I wish.  Or, to
    buy a CD or tape.  I have some control of where my dough goes to.  
    
    But, unless I do watch in order to determine which products to boycott,
    how will I know which ones they are?
    
    I've been had, and it ain't gonna stop.
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.486 | It'll be nickel beer night again! | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:28 | 11 | 
|  |     Luvs it Bob,
    My new amour,the Cleveland Indians vs PeeWee's Expos in the Series.
    I cain see it now.
    80,000 screamin' Cleveland maroons on a cold October night in the
    Mistake by the Lake. But only 2000 of 'em are Chop, Choppin' away
    and chantin'. Da rest are all dressed in brown,wif' dog masks on
    throwin' bones at dem Expos and woofin'. They think the Brownies
    are playin'! Great baseball town that Cleveland is.
    
    Mikel
    
 | 
| 3.487 | maybe the Braves were just hungrier | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:29 | 16 | 
|  |     Was it all that long ago that the late Lyman Bostock offered to take a
    cut in his next season's salary, following what he felt was an off-year?
    
    re Lee:
    
    > Know what?  There was an incentive back then for players to win the
    > pennant and WS.  It was called MONEY!  LOTS of MONEY, compared to what
    > their salaries were.  Which were still pretty good compared to the
    > working man.
    
    For a Steve Avery or a Brian Hunter who's making the major league
    minimum, the World Series purse *is* going to almost equal their
    salaries.  Perhaps that was the difference... 
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.488 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:34 | 21 | 
|  |     I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year, but that was
    mostly because I work evenings now and can't justify taking a day off
    to go see baseball, much.
    
    I will, hosever, take a day off once in a while to take my family to a
    game, BUT, only on a Wednesday night when the Bucs have what is called
    "Family Buck Night".  I get parking for a buck, gen. admission for a
    buck, a hot dog for a buck and a coke for a buck.  That's $13(souvenirs
    not included) for me and the wife, and our 2 older children(8 and 5 yrs
    old) to see the game.  The kids mainly want to watch teh Pirate Parrot,
    but my daughter, 8, likes to watch the game, too.
    
    Now $13 ain't too bad, but if I wanted box seats, the price jumps to
    $57.  Take away the Buc night promotion and we're talking $85 or more.
    Hell, I cain take the kids to a movie and "Chuck E. Cheese's" 3 or 4
    times for that kind of money.
    
    So for me and my fmaily, it's "Buck Night" or not at all.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.489 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:34 | 44 | 
|  |     
    	Getting back to the subject at hand...
    
    	Congrats to the Braves..they deserved it.  They took 3-4 in the
    Pirates home park which is quite amazing.
    
    	As for the Pirates, if no one else will say it, I will...CHOKE
    They had the best record in baseball, had 2, count em 2 MVP candidates,
    an ex-Cy Young'er, a legit Cy Young candidate and they end up being
    shut out 3 times in 7 games.  Pathetic..
    
    	For the money, anyone can have Bonds or Bonilla.  Bonilla and Bonds
    have tried to hold the Pirates hostage for a couple of years now by
    holding this "or else" mentality over the organization.  As far as I
    am concerned, they aren't worth the hassle.  Over the last 2 years 
    when the money was on the line, neither produced much more than a
    pile of sunflower shells.
    
    	As I said yesterday, this is not the Pirates I once knew, loved,
    and emulated.  This team has no clubhouse leader like a Stargell or
    Clemente.  This team had/has no identity.
    
    	As for the non-sellout last night, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette
    said it all on Thursday when they said that Atlanta had (already)
    won the best of 7 series.  One thing Pittsburgh fans aren't and that
    is dumb.  This series was over after game 6.  Actually, I'm glad 
    a lot of the folks didn't waste 40 bucks to see this sorry bunch.  
    
    	True, the city isn't a great baseball town, but then again, they
    aren't a bad baseball town either.  Pittsburgh people will rally behind
    anyone they feel is giving their all.  I simply don't think the
    people of the city feel that close to this current group of players
    especially Bonds and Bonilla.  The folks of Pittsburgh have many fond
    memories of the older players that extended themselves in the field
    and around the city.  Few if any of the older crew, ever moaned
    and groaned about pay and threatened to leave.  These things simply
    don't sit well with the people of Pittsburgh.  Most have worked pretty
    damn hard to make ends meet and they expect nothing less from the
    pro athletes that represent the city.  If they feel they are being
    taken, they will let you know, and that's pretty much what they did
    last night IMO.
    
    
    							bill..g.
 | 
| 3.490 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:51 | 31 | 
|  |     bill..g.
    
    I went to my first Pirate game at the ripe old age of 5, in 1960, at
    Forbes field.  Smokey Burgeww won teh game for the BUcs with a 9th
    inning home run.  I watched it from the left field bleachers.
    
    I lived 6 miles from Forbes Field, and spent many a summer evening or
    weekend afternoon at Forbes field.  Watched Stargell when he was a left
    fielder, Bill Virdon in Center, Clemente, the true "Great One", in
    right.  "Maz" at second, and a host of others.  I agree with you, these
    teams had an identity, character, they were proud to play for the
    Pirates, and showed true loyalty.
    
    As you've stated, the current Pirate teamhas no identity.  The Outfield
    "B"'s(Bonds and Bonilla) both will jump to whoever pays them 5� more a
    year.  Bonilla thinks hit SLOF don't stink, when in reality, he's 
    nothing more thatn a decent ballplayer, definitely no "SUPERSTAR" like
    he'll obviously get paid for.  Bonds has all of the tools to become
    baseball's next "SUPERSTAR", strong bat, CAN hit for average, hit for
    power, he's FAST on the bases, and has a top quality glove in lefted
    field, plus a strong arm.  He's got one more year in Pgh, if he doesn't
    get traded first, and where is his mind set??  He says if Bonilla goes,
    he'll be gone nexted year.  Good, go a$$hole.  So much for team spirit
    and dedication.   It's this kind of mindset adn arrogance which will be
    the downfall of professional(major league) baseball, if not most or all
    pro sports.
    
    Ya heerd it here firsted
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.491 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:55 | 13 | 
|  |     People complained when Babe Ruth was getting paid big bucks (remember
    his line about having a better year than the president?).  Nothing's
    changed.
    
    Although baseball is probably the most individual of the team sports, I
    think it would be pretty tough to set up a salary scale based on what
    Jake suggests.  A pitcher might have a 1.57 ERA but be 12-8 because he
    has a poor defense and an anemic offense behind him.  A player could be
    batting over 300 but have a handful of RBI's because the guys in front
    of him aren't doing their jobs.  It also puts a lot of pressure on the
    manager when it comes to things like pulling a pitcher going for his
    xth shutout or benching a player in a slump who's going for his yth
    RBI.
 | 
| 3.492 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:56 | 24 | 
|  | 1960 must've been a GREAT year to be a Pirate fan.
I'll be that 7th game of the Series was a doozy!
What was it, something like 9-9 in the bottom of the 9th, when Maz
hit what had to be one of the greatest all time homers that game has
ever seen.
What kid hasn't fantasicize this, when playing sandlot ball:
	World Series, 7th game, bottom of the 9th.
	Men on first and second with 2 outs.
	The count is 1-2, the visitors lead by one....
My brother and I would do that endless hours in the neighborhood.
If you were in the field, you made that great leaping catch at the
wall to save the game.....
"Memories, light the corners of my mind"
'Saw
 | 
| 3.493 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:59 | 32 | 
|  | >    Although baseball is probably the most individual of the team sports, I
>    think it would be pretty tough to set up a salary scale based on what
>    Jake suggests.  A pitcher might have a 1.57 ERA but be 12-8 because he
>    has a poor defense and an anemic offense behind him.  A player could be
>    batting over 300 but have a handful of RBI's because the guys in front
>    of him aren't doing their jobs.  It also puts a lot of pressure on the
>    manager when it comes to things like pulling a pitcher going for his
>    xth shutout or benching a player in a slump who's going for his yth
>    RBI.
They ought to do it like they do here at DEC.
Make you write up a bunch of bullshit on how you felt you did in the
last year, write up there own bunch of bullshit, which is obviously
better bullshit than yours because they're getting paid more than
you.
Then they tell you that your bullshit is bullshit, while theirs is
right.
Then they make you have a woodie will they give you a little raise.
You sit there and smile like they're so benevolent, then you leave
the room saying "Cheap ass bastard".
Everybody else goes through the same thing, but you can't tell anyone
else what you make.
hell, if baseball did that, it'd probably still cost .50 to go to a game....
 | 
| 3.494 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Help, Set Lee's Profile | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:00 | 8 | 
|  |     Looking at Bonds (and to some extent Bonilla), the Mets' fan in me knew
    what the Buc fan was going through.  I saw "Darryl" written all over
    their play.  Ship them to L.A., where they love that type.  Great
    talent, no doubt.  No heart, however.
    
    Yep, I saw a little Strawberry in Barry Bonds...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.495 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:04 | 12 | 
|  |     >I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year...
    
    Typical Pirates "fan."  This is why the franchise must be moved to a
    baseball town - for the good a the game, for its honor.  Last night
    was a mortifying embarrassment.  Not only the thousands a empty seats
    for the NLCS' game 7, but the fack that the stadium was half empty as
    the Pirates batted in the 9th.
    
    Hey, git a clue you low quality Pittsburgh baseball "fans": This ain't
    football, they have no clock in baseball!
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.496 | Yankees battle Confederates in 1800's rematch! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:11 | 14 | 
|  |     Although this didn't receive any publicity on CBS (surprise!) there
    were mucho problems in the stands last night at 3 Rivers.  Seems all the
    Braves fans that poured in were not too appreciated by the Pittsburgh
    attendees.  With defeat staring them in the face and the Atlanta fans
    seemingly rubbing it in their faces with the tomahawks and war chant,
    they headed up into the stands to try_an shut 'em up.
    
    IMO the wound that hurt these overly emotional (not to mention
    intoxicated) Pirate fans wasn't the pro-Atlanta cheering, but the fack 
    that so many were able to git tickets and attend the game in the
    first place!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
 | 
| 3.497 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:17 | 24 | 
|  |     
    >>                         <<< Note 3.495 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" >>>
    >>>I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year...
    
   >> Typical Pirates "fan."  This is why the franchise must be moved to a
   >> baseball town - for the good a the game, for its honor.  Last night
    
    
    Get the whole freaking context from the original note,
    Twinkiesupthedirtshute.
    
    Precisely how many verifiable Twinkies game did you attned this year,
    that YOU PAID for???????
    
    20, 30, 40?????
    
    I agree that lasted night's attendance was an abomination, but I
    haven't done my investigation yet as to the why's and how's.
    
    Full report in a month or twenty.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.498 |  | CSC32::SALZER |  | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:23 | 13 | 
|  |     This summer I watched a lot of baseball and without question game 6
    was about the finest performance I've seen this season. Atlanta 
    has had opportunity after opportunity to fall to the wayside late
    but they haven't.  We waited for their collapse after the Nixon
    bust and they didn't. We waited for them to fold in the heat racing
    with the Dodgers and they didn't do that either. Then faced with
    winning 2 of 2 in Pittsburgh and fight their way out of a terrible
    hitting and scoring slump, many had them written off. The Braves
    then preceeded to shut them out in 2 straight. I don't believe
    there's enough water in all the lakes of Minnesota to cool these
    boys down. That bunch is hot right now.  
    
    BoB
 | 
| 3.499 | Bye Bees | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:28 | 13 | 
|  |     As a lifelong Pirate Fan, I say...
    
    Bye Bye Bobby
    Bye Bye Barry
    
    Who is in Buffalo?
    
    I can't put up with Bonilla's greediness or Bond's attitude.  Not if
    they can't back up their demands with action.  Enough is enough.  Bonds
    may be Dave Parker all over again.  Bonilla just ain't that great. 
    Bobby Bo... no defense, slightly above average hitter.
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.500 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:35 | 13 | 
|  |     
    >>they can't back up their demands with action.  Enough is enough.  Bonds
    >>may be Dave Parker all over again.  Bonilla just ain't that great. 
    
    I disagree, Parker contributed to the 1979 World Champ team during the
    playoffs and in the WS, Bonds hasn't contributed as much as a wooden
    nickle.  
    
    On the other hand, Bonds hasn't tried to snort up the foul lines,m
    either, YET!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.501 | I just don't care about the Pirates much anymore | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:41 | 11 | 
|  |     Compare these two quotes on free agency and tell me who has heart:
    
    "If they want a championship in Pittsburgh, they're going to have to
    pay for it." 
    
    	Barry Bonds
    
    "If you transplant a tree, you might damage the roots."
    
    	Willie Stargell
    
 | 
| 3.502 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:45 | 5 | 
|  | dan'l  --
You couldn't have picked a better illustration of the demise of 
baseball in the last twenty years.....
 | 
| 3.503 | Missed by 2/3 of a inning | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:56 | 23 | 
|  |  File this one under "some things never change" ...
 
 Read in yesterday's paper that the Reds refused to pay Jose Rijo a
 performance incentive bonus of $62,500.    Rijo's contract stated that he
 would receive the extra dough if he pitched 205 innings or more.
 
 Rijo finished the year with 204 and 1/3 innings pitched.    He missed
 quite a few starts with a mid-season ankle injury, too.    But Schott
 stiffed him anyway.
 
 According to the Black Sox legend, Charlie Comiskey stiffed Eddie Cicotte
 out of a $10,000 bonus because he won *only* 29 games instead of 30.  
 Cicotte went on, of course, to lose 2 games to the Reds in the tainted
 1919 Series.
 
 Yes, you can make the argument that neither player reached their
 agreed-upon goal and shouldn't have been paid no matter how close they
 came to it for whatever reason.
 
 But, is it any wonder that ballplayers look to leave town on the firsted
 train out ???
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.504 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:10 | 11 | 
|  | While it's JMHO, smart management would say:
	Okay Jose, you missed it by 2/3 of an inning.  Well give you
	the bonus, but we'll take off a commensurate amount.
Player is happy, you've given him what he's earned, and next season he
feels like he can trust you, and he goes out and gives it his all...
But again, JMHO,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.505 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:12 | 10 | 
|  |                                                                
 >   Not to say it's the players' fault either, it's a combination of both
 >   the management and the players.  Greed, Greed, Greed.
    
	It's not the fault of management or the players its societies fault.  
We, through tickets, souvenirs, cable, and  buying sponsors products
pay these salaries.  We give the money to the entertainment industry.  
Mike
 | 
| 3.506 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:41 | 9 | 
|  | �You couldn't have picked a better illustration of the demise of 
�baseball in the last twenty years.....
    
    I'd say the death of baseball has been greatly exaggerated.  People are
    going to the ballparks in record numbers.  Two new teams will be added
    to the NL.  Baseball paraphenalia is a better investment than a blue
    chip stock (and you wonder why athletes are charging for autographs?). 
    There is more TV coverage of baseball than ever before (even with CBS
    abysmal regular season coverage).
 | 
| 3.507 | 8^) | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:46 | 12 | 
|  | Okay, I'll put it in terms you can understand then:
	Willie Stargell -- Rugby Union
	Bobby Bonds	-- Rugby League
Catch my drift?
Sure, I knew ya would,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.508 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:47 | 28 | 
|  |     >but I haven't done my invesitigation yet as to the why's [sic] and 
    >how's [sic].
    
    Shouldn't this read "but I haven't cooked up my shameless spin-control
    job yet," wouldn't that be more, er, intellectually honest?!
    
    Why investigate at all, RaKe?  Why not just belly up to reality and 
    admit that these thousands a seats were empty cuz Pittsburghians just
    didn't care, that the town just isn't a baseball town worth a damn.
    
    re: Rick
    
    I agree.  The Braves' three starters look like maybe the best group
    going into a Series since the days of Koufax and Drysdale. 
    
    The Twins, on paper mind you, look stronger on offense, somewhat 
    stronger on defense (the Twins are a excellent D team with no holes,
    the Braves have some fine defenders [Pendleton] but a hole or two)...
    
    I think the Twins have better relievers BUT the Braves the stronger
    starters, much stronger.  And, in a 7 game Title series 3 guys cain
    wreak a lotta damage.  Just think back to what Orel Hershisher and Co.
    did to the A's!
    
    People in Minnesota think the Series will go the full 7 with the Twins
    prevailing cuz a the homefield advantage...
    
    MrT(wins win!)
 | 
| 3.509 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:49 | 9 | 
|  |     
    Mac;
    you're right but I'd lay money that it won't last long cause the
    general pubic will sooner or later, and I'd say sooner, get fed up with
    it and turn their back on baseball.  Not everybocy, but a major amount
    of the heretofore "faithful".
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.510 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:57 | 9 | 
|  |     	Hey MorT, talk about spin control!  Here you are talkin' up
    the Braves staff like it's Hall O' Fame material and poormouthin'
    your Spamball Chumps to CYA just in case the Braves win.  Just a
    few days ago you wuz puffin' out that hairy chest of yours about
    the Twinks.  HAHAHAHAHA�
    
    				/Don
    
    	P.S. Go Braves!  Win it for baseball!
 | 
| 3.511 | I'll take that bet | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:59 | 17 | 
|  |  �   you're right but I'd lay money that it won't last long cause the
 �   general pubic will sooner or later, and I'd say sooner, get fed up with
 �   it and turn their back on baseball.  Not everybocy, but a major amount
 �   of the heretofore "faithful".
 
 Sorry, JaKe, but you'd lose your money.   Fans have been complaining about
 baseball for over a century and half now.    They thought the players were
 overpaid worthless bums back when they made pennies comparaed to today's
 numbers.
 
 Yet attendance and popularity have climbed nearly every year.   If the
 1981 mid-season strike and the subsequently smaller labor disputes didn't
 kill it, then it's immortal.   Probably always was.
 
 There are more and more "faithful" every year.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.512 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 15:14 | 43 | 
|  |     
    >>Why investigate at all, RaKe?  Why not just belly up to reality and 
    >>admit that these thousands a seats were empty cuz Pittsburghians just
    >>didn't care, that the town just isn't a baseball town worth a damn.
    
    T, I must admit that the first part of your statement is possibly true.
    It appals me that the stadium only had 47k in it lasted night, and I
    hold true to my contention that that affected the Pirate players.
    
    As per you sewage that Pgh isn't worht a damn as a baseball town,
    bullsh!t.  Pittsburgh is a town rich inn baseball tradition, spanning
    back to the 1800's.  Who played in the first World Series, I aks
    you????  Pittsburgh .vs. Boston. The Pirates have had some of the best
    players of all time play for them, Clemente, Mazeroski, Stargell, Honus
    Wagner, Paul and Lloyd Waner, and many more whose names elude me right
    now.  If Pgh was so horrible as a baseball town, why did they set club
    attendance records in each of the lasted 2 years?????The club had never
    drawn 2 mil in their history and now they've done it 2 years straight.
    Sure, a few years back they only dres 700k+, but the team was LOADED
    with a bunch of deadweight who couldn't have beat a team of corpses.
    Buys like George"I don't run out ground balls"Hendricks, Steve Kemp,
    Sammy Khalifa, and a host of others who were barely class "A" minor
    league material.  Why drop $30 for the night when you could pay $.25
    the nexted day for the paper and read about the LOSS.  People got tired
    of Chuck "dipshit" Tanner's attitude, "oh well, that's the breaks".
    They won the '79 World Championship in spite op Tanner, not because of
    him.
    
    Baseball was in Pittsburgh long before youse Minny-sodains even knew
    how to walk upright.  But the fans will turn out in droves to the
    Hubert's House of Heifers Metrognome so's they cain show off their
    Beamers in the parking lot, eat tons of Brie and sushi, and drink
    expensive crappy tasting wine, along with their freinds, Muffy and
    Biff,  and they'll just generally YUP OUT!!
    
    I don't know what kept the people away from lasted night's game, but if
    I had been in the 'burgh, I woulda been there.  I know now that there's
    many people who are glad they didn't drop the $40 to see the shitty
    excuse for a basebnall game the Bucs pretended to play lasted night.
    
    JaKe
    
    
 | 
| 3.513 | Weekend! | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 15:25 | 12 | 
|  |     JaKe, weren't you walking out of the classroom about an hour ago?
    
    T's even made you log on longer than you have to.  Get home and when
    you come out of the tunnel tonight, say a little "hello" for ol' dan'l.  
    
    Believe it or not, I'm off to Atlanta tonight.  Going swimming with a
    girl I hardly know down there.  Wonder how many laps I can do in that
    hotel room jacuzee.  Should be fun.
    
    See yunz.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.514 |  | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Fri Oct 18 1991 15:50 | 11 | 
|  | >    Believe it or not, I'm off to Atlanta tonight.  Going swimming with a
>    girl I hardly know down there.  Wonder how many laps I can do in that
>    hotel room jacuzee.  Should be fun.
    
dan'l,
You're really starting to annoy me!
If you're going swimming with her and you hardly know her, be safe....
Wear a wetsuit!  8^)
 | 
| 3.515 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:24 | 14 | 
|  | >lately your notes are starting to read like a cheap
>    harlequin novel.
    
    Funny, so is my life.
    
    Thanks for the chuckle, Saw.  Just what I needed after the Pirates'
    demise.  (See, I knew I could get this back to the NL.)
    
    Is anyone going to start a world series note or will that discussion be
    reduced to IgKnorr and T(winkie brain) on VAXphone since this will be
    so anti-climactic?
    
    	--dan'l
    
 | 
| 3.516 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:26 | 23 | 
|  |     Main I *luv* you Pittsburgh guys!  
    
    First, cuz almost all a you seem to be *from* Pittsburgh.  And, hey,
    I ain't gonna rub your faces in the stinky choke-job turned in by
    them fishbone sword-swallowers who wear those stupid retro puke yellow
    and black uniforms who shall remain nameless to protect the guilty.
    
    No, I LUV the way you guys shamelessly fed us a crock o' bull about 
    last year's empty seats and now THIS year what do we git?
    
    	* Dan'l turning to unsafe sex to salve his remorse
    
    	* RaKe waxing about antediluvian history as if it somehow meant
          anything.  Hey, RaKe, git a clue willya.  Be here now!  Be here
          now or be square how you cain compare Pirate feigns with real
          baseball fans is beyond MrT and reality!
    
    re: Rochibaud
    
    Know what?  It's good to see you finally emerge as WardleVane's
    successor.  But, like Pittsburghians, you ain't even a good front-runner.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.517 | And now in the pike position... | SHALOT::MEDVID | You cause as much sorrow dead | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:43 | 5 | 
|  | >    	* Dan'l turning to unsafe sex to salve his remorse
    
    Never do I perform unsafe sex.  I ALWAYS use a safety net.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.518 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Fri Oct 18 1991 17:08 | 7 | 
|  |     MrT
    
     I really don't think this guy comes close to Wardlevane when it
    come to blowing in the wind.......  I could be wrong,  lets ask JoJ's
    dog Jerry !!!!  ;^)
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.519 | Reaction from Pittsburgh has been sad and disappointing | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Sun Oct 20 1991 14:55 | 73 | 
|  |     
    Little late on this, but... first things first, I must extend a hearty 
    congratulations to the Braves.  For the most part, this team is a bunch 
    of kids, mere pups, and they didn't back down one iota in response to 
    the pressure of this intense NLCS.  They slipped up a bit last night, 
    but I expect they'll be back strong tonight to tie things up at 1-1.  
    I don't know if MrT was blowing smoke or not, but regardless I guess he 
    got to see what he wanted in Game 1 from that "corporate box" of his,
    wherever it might be located.
    
    On a second point, I hope most of what I've read in the aftermath of 
    Game 7 was just the immediate emotional reaction to a disappointing 
    series for the Pirates, because most of it doesn't make too much sense.
    Would we be hearing all this crying over overpaid players and ticket
    prices if Bonds and company had come through and the Braves hadn't? 
    I seriously doubt it.  Hey, somebody's got to win and somebody's got 
    to lose, even if *both* sides get paid well (and if the Braves' players
    aren't right now, they soon will be).  I can also personally attest
    that there are many, many tickets available and affordable to families
    in Pittsburgh, on a regular basis, so I'm not buying into this business
    of the Pirates losing a big series somehow being responsible for all
    that's wrong in sports today.  Look at it from the other side, from the
    Braves' side, and general opinion on the matter shifts pretty quickly
    towards what's still great about the game of baseball...
    
    Why is all of this invective being hurled exclusively at Bonds and
    Bonilla, too?  What about Van Slyke?  Why is he such a sacred cow?  The
    guy's the highest paid player on the team, has already got his money
    instead of just waiting to get it, and admitted that he didn't set the 
    stage for the 3-4-5 slots and just didn't get it done (after Game 1
    he was just as much an automatic out as the guys who followed).  I'll 
    go on record as saying that if Bonds ends up walking (Bonilla's already 
    gone) in part because the Pirates decided to pay Van Slyke $4 million a 
    year over a longterm contract, they decided on the wrong guy.  I like
    Slick, but he's no Bonds, and at $4 million is overpaid by MLB standards.
    You might like his "attitude", for whatever that's worth, but it will be 
    no substitute for production.  
    
    For more perspective on Bonds, let's not forget what the eminently 
    lovable Willie Stargell did in his first *five* postseason appearances 
    *before* 1979-- .221, 2 HR, 6 RBI in the playoffs (in four of five 
    *losing* efforts), and .208, 0 HR, 1 RBI in the 1971 Series.  Are you
    guys forgetting that Willie had a *major* "choke" albatross around his
    neck going into 1979, or were you just more of a faithful fan, win or 
    lose?  Or was the offense really more forgivable just because Stargell 
    wasn't hauling down six figures?  I can't buy that.  Our memories are 
    short and always subject to revision, especially where winning and 
    losing-- a 50/50 proposition-- is concerned.  Bonds has plenty of time 
    left, and I for one would love to see a player of his caliber on my 
    team for years to come.  He's that kind of talent, and eventually 
    talent wins out.
    
    Lastly, there's no excuse for how far short Game 7 was from a sellout.
    History doesn't mean a thing if there aren't many natives left who 
    truly appreciate it.  Pittburghers sensing the "choke" doesn't cut it
    as an answer, either (how many of those folks would have been right 
    back on the bandwagon for the World Series?).  I had three members of 
    my immediate family, still die-hard Pirates fans all (I gave up such 
    rigid allegiance to my team of birthright long ago), at this series-- 
    who came in from Cincinnati, DC, and San Francisco to do so (these
    people aren't rich either, but they do understand that the opportunity
    to see the Pirates in the postseason, much less a Game 7, is a rare
    one).  It is a shame that a Game 7 to the most exciting series in years
    wasn't able to attract even 50,000 fans, even if just as fans of great 
    baseball.  If the Pirates ever do move from Pittsburgh, which really 
    would be a great tragedy, the fans who couldn't even make it out to a 
    Game 7 at the home park of the team with the best record in baseball 
    would only have themselves to blame.  You can't keep pointing fingers at
    management, not when the product has been as good as the Pirates the
    past few years...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.520 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Oct 21 1991 08:57 | 10 | 
|  |     >They slipped up a bit lasnight...
    
    Got their butts kicked is more like i
    
    >... but I suspect they'll be back strong tonight to tie things up at 
    >1-1
    
    No, they're 0-2 and whining about the umpiring.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.521 | Proof Positive | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 09:23 | 22 | 
|  |     Took a trip to Atlanta this weekend to visit a young lady friend of
    mine.  She is a professed Braves fan, but was quite merciful on my
    emotional state regarding the Bucs' choke job.  
    
    Anyway, she gets this room for us at the Marriott Suites downtown.  She
    said she would have a snack (food) waiting for me when I arrived after
    my long drive Friday evening.  Walked in the door, and there's this
    plate of crackers and this round glop of cheese on a plate waiting for
    me.  I asked, "What's that?"
    
    I kid you not, folks.  She replied...
    
    
    
    "Brie"
    
    
    
    It was all I could do from becoming the total definition of Seriously
    Rollward.  I ate only the crackers and got down to business.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.522 | Transplanted Minnesotan? | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Mon Oct 21 1991 09:25 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.523 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Oct 21 1991 09:32 | 9 | 
|  |     Why didn't you eat the brie?  It woluda inured you buds for sensory
    impacts encountered only minutes later, us it's a food much preferred
    by people of discrination, taste, and class.
    
    Or, more to the point, what was the beer?  Heinekin or Iron City (that
    watered-down swill much loved by chest-beating pseudo-machos too skeert
    and not main enough to admit they've made it).
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.524 | Yuppies, Blue Bloods, and then there's ol' dan'l | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 09:47 | 28 | 
|  | >    Or, more to the point, what was the beer?  Heinekin or Iron City (that
>    watered-down swill much loved by chest-beating pseudo-machos too skeert
>    and not main enough to admit they've made it).
    She had Rolling Rock waiting for me.  It was a good beer before it
    became yuppified, so that and the crackers (no pun intended) weren't
    that bad.
    And another thing, you should see Atlanta and how totally they are
    behind this team.  Got my first taste of it about 20 miles outside of
    the city when this pickup truck merges into the lane next to me and
    what should it have attached to the bed but a 10 foot, totally
    aerodynamic tomahawk.  And driving into the city, if a building doesn't
    have a tomahawk on it, it looks out of place.  Even the church steeples
    have tomahawks on them.
    Went to a formal reception at the Georgian Terrace Hotel Saturday
    night.  There's ol' dan'l mixing with the Atlanta Blue Bloods, looking
    for some old rich sugar mamma with one foot in the grave wanting
    companionship for the last few years of her life.  No such luck. 
    Anyway, I digress; most of these aristocrats in black tie and buns
    cumbered were wearing walkmans, or had watchmans, or had brought
    portables and were watching the game out on the terrace.  Their being
    so engrossed with the game left the food and drink lines short and boy
    did I take advantage of that...with utmost decorum of course.
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.525 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Mon Oct 21 1991 09:58 | 6 | 
|  |     	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.526 |  | CAM::WAY | Ain' no sunshine when she's gone | Mon Oct 21 1991 10:07 | 16 | 
|  | Actually, Brie is not a bad cheese at all.  
Like other yuppified things, however, it has been tainted by the fact
that genetically inferior financially superior people like Chip and
Muffy have made it a symbol of their plastic lifestyle....
I'm not a big wine drinker, preferring beer and/or whiskey (Jack Daniels),
so if I ever have Brie, it ain't with win or Perrier.  (You oughta see
folks do a double take if I'm having Brie with my Jack).....
Still love a good sharp (Supremely SHARP) Vermont Cheddar the best....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.527 | Camembert's danged good, too | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 10:44 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.528 | #71 in my BBall hat collection !!!! | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Mon Oct 21 1991 10:57 | 18 | 
|  |     T,
    
    I see from your personal name that you REALLY did go to da game since
    
    that particular banner wasn't shown on TV but the guy in my office
    
    told me about it earlier today.  (He also brought me a super looking
    
    Twins BBall hat, white cloth with red 1991 "M" stiched in and in large
    
    dark blue letters "Champions" stiched in just above the brim.
    
    Also hanging from my partition wall is a Homer Hankie.
    
    I gots to know - How many plates can ya stack on Bonds butt??
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.529 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 11:37 | 10 | 
|  |     Best banner I ever saw in my life.  Btw, I saw Ted on the concourse 
    during the game.  He was walking along with this grin on his face
    (not a care in the world, but if *you* had $200M and Jane wouldn't
    YOU be grinning too?) and poking at this tiny hand-held electronic
    device not even watching where he was going.  
    
    But we watched were he was going and he was going back to sit next
    to Jane.  Dirty rat.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.530 | Yeah, sure he did ... | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:06 | 14 | 
|  |  � I see from your personal name that you REALLY did go to da game since that
 � particular banner wasn't shown on TV but the guy in my office told me
 � about it earlier today.
 
 Not so fast, Kev.   The "Jane and Ted's Bogus Adventure" banner may not
 have been shown on the tube but it was described in yeterday's Series
 coverage in the St. Paul Pioneer Press.
 
 So, our favorite prankster's new p_name might very well be another cruel
 prank.   I think we need more proof.    I didn't see or hear about a
 "Snuff Chokes!" banner so I think it's safe to say that T did *NOT* go to
 the game.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.531 | from a reputable news source! | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:14 | 14 | 
|  |     I forget eggzakly where I saw it but I think it was in the
    
    Sunday "Parade" magazine and they had a blurb on Jane.  Seems that
    
    although she's a bodacious 53 years old, she's travelled the road
    
    that Cher has - a nip here, a tuck there and a implant to go from a 
    
    "A" to a "B".
    
    HTH,
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.532 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:32 | 6 | 
|  |     T -- ask Spud about his encounter with Ted and Jane after last night's
    game (if he hasn't already told you about it, or if you haven't already
    read the BASEBALL conference).
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.533 | "but Ump, he PULLED my leg offa da bag!!!!" | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Mon Oct 21 1991 12:43 | 22 | 
|  |     No athletic contest would be complete without a bit of
    
    controversy so let's start this one with that little bit
    
    of an "encounter" at first base in the 4th(?) inning when the
    
    MinnyTwinny (don't remember his name) 1st baseman, ahem, assisted
    
    the Braves guy (ditto on the name) offa the bag and had him called
    
    out.
    
    Should he have been safe?  
    
    I loved how CBS tried to create an issue out of it by bringing in
    
    Lasorda and umps to keep it going.  I'm only doing my part here
    
    to help!  ~/~
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.534 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:00 | 7 | 
|  |     Gant's motion pulled him off the bag.  Hrbek merely tagged him.
    You don't have to be Einstein to know that as Hrbie maintained
    the tag that it would appear as if he were pulling his leg when
    in fack he was only maintaining contact with the leg's upward
    motion that was the result of Gan's clumsiness.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.535 | lousy cal | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:06 | 7 | 
|  |     RE.534
    
    Yea sure... Gant just about knocked little Kent over.
    
    I don't care who wins this boring series.  
    
    I thought Eric Gregg was working first on that call.
 | 
| 3.536 | And McCarver is still a boob | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:09 | 14 | 
|  |     Thank you, Dr. Science.
    
    The head of umps in the booth put it best (when I though he was going
    to really defend his umpire) when he:
    
    	- explained the rule
    	- said it was the ump's judgement call
    
    It was a good call if you're a Twinks fan.  It was a bad call if you're
    a Bravos fan.  It was the ump's call if you're anything else.
    
    And I loved when they woke up Lasorda to ask his opinion.  
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.537 |  | CAM::WAY | Ain' no sunshine when she's gone | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:18 | 4 | 
|  | >    And I loved when they woke up Lasorda to ask his opinion.  
    
They didn't wake him up.  They had to pry the Thick, Rich and
DEEEE-licous SlimeFast shake outta his mouth.....8^)
 | 
| 3.538 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:42 | 12 | 
|  | RE: Call at first
	I think Hrbeck pulled him off.  Great move too...you never get the call
if you don't give it a try.  
	and where is Mr. Robichaud today now that the spamball representative
has jumped out 2-0.  Look the Braves may need that luck after all huh /Don?
	Twins in 5....
mc
 | 
| 3.539 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:53 | 16 | 
|  |     Credit Tim McCarver for maintaining his objectivity as a analyst
    (I *LUV* it when they do that!) vis a vis the Twins among this
    pro-NL crew.
    
    He corrected the senile Jack Buck on several points, not the least
    a which is that the Dome was silent on Lemke's stupid mistake on
    the pop fly and therefore noise played no part in that miscommunication.
    
    Even Lasorda was still making this false claim at the broadcast's end.
    
    The Twins are licking their chops at the prospect of taking their big
    bats to the punk home run park called the Launching Pad.
    
    Twins in 5.
    
    MrT(wins)
 | 
| 3.540 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:55 | 3 | 
|  |        /Don lost his voice at the Pats game yesterday. That's why he's so
    quiet in here. He talks as he types.
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.541 |  | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:55 | 5 | 
|  |     If it was deemed Hrbek was interfering, does the runner get second?  Is
    there any deterrent on the first baseman's part?
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.542 | T in same league as McCarver...that'll tell ya somethin' | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:02 | 13 | 
|  | >    a which is that the Dome was silent on Lemke's stupid mistake on
>    the pop fly and therefore noise played no part in that miscommunication.
    
    You are right, T.  It wasn't the noise that disrupted an otherwise
    routine play, but it was still the dome that caused that ball to drop. 
    In my opinion, both players feared taking their eyes off the ball and
    consequently losing it in the white roof.  
    
    Still, Justice should have been calling anyone off regardless if he
    knew Lemke was there or not.  Error on young Dave any way you look at
    it.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.543 | ;-) | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:07 | 7 | 
|  |     I find it sort of ironic that Mr. T is supporting a team that plays 
    in that DH league and on that artificial stuff.
    
    Anyone know what the Twinkies record is in real stadiums with real
    grass?
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.544 | they both know Conan too...
they both know Conan the Libarian too... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:11 | 6 | 
|  |  Not really Mike when you consider that the Wardleshooter hisself introduced
 T to this fine conference...
 obviously they had more in common than just work....
 ;^)
 | 
| 3.545 | Reposted for Tex Corbett.  I'll stick with this prediction | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Cardiac Pats | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:15 | 13 | 
|  |            <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.525               The National League (Baseball)               525 of 544
AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Doin' the Tomahawk Chop"             6 lines  21-OCT-1991 09:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.546 | Slide yells the 1st base coach! | TSGDEV::RUSSELL |  | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:20 | 6 | 
|  |     No one mentions that Gant Should have slid back to first base.  If he
    had slid then there wouldn't have been any problems.   Gant should be
    lambasted for his mistakes, go to far of 1st to draw a throw and then
    not to slide. 
    
    
 | 
| 3.547 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:25 | 7 | 
|  | 
RE: /Don
	good enough...I just want to make sure you eat your share of 
crow when the Spamballer win it.
mc
 | 
| 3.548 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:33 | 8 | 
|  |     re the last couple:
    
    Braves taking three in Hotlanta is the one chance they have to still
    pull this off.   Even 2 of 3 at home makes it necessary for the Braves
    to take Games 6 AND 7 in Minnesota....I just don't see them doing that.
    
    
    py     
 | 
| 3.549 | Neither did the Pirates | WMOIS::REEVE_C |  | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:40 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.550 | Go Twins!  Keep Beating the Atlanta Braves !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:43 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.551 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:56 | 11 | 
|  |     >                      -< Neither did the Pirates >-
    
    Yes, BUT -- the Twinkiedome is a MUCH bigger home field advantage than
    Three Rivers.   You can take it to the bank that there would not be
    7,000 empty seats for a Game 7 in Minnesota, then throw in the physical
    factors (such as the roof) plus the fact that it's AL rules (i.e., DH
    is used, giving the Twins a much stronger lineup 1 to 9 than they'll
    have in Atlanta where the pitchers must bat.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.552 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:25 | 12 | 
|  |     I think it's interesting that everyone is blaming the ump and Hrebek
    for the call at 1st rather than Gant. I would say this situation is
    very much like the "missed" third base during the NLCS. Gant knew he
    would make it back, very much like Justice knew he had touched 3rd. In
    both cases, perception became reality as Justice was called out and
    Gant couldn't "hold" the bag at 1st. The AL ump at first should have
    seen the problem (although I can't say the same for the Justice play at
    third) but from what I've heard today he's not one of the better umps
    in the AL. 
    
    Dennis
    
 | 
| 3.553 | Dennis... you're blind! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:32 | 6 | 
|  |     Dennis...
    
    You couldn't have seen the play and thought Gants' momentum carried him
    off!  I thought you paid attention to this sport!
    
    Rick:^)
 | 
| 3.554 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:38 | 5 | 
|  |     Rick, 
    
    At least one person thought it did!!!	:*)
    
    Dennis
 | 
| 3.555 | Gant, Justice, Lemke, Bream... MISTAKE-PRONE !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:55 | 5 | 
|  |     Gant's momentum clearly carried him off the bag.  Shoddy baserunning
    on his part.  A course, *then* protocol dictates that poor Hrbie (the
    best defensive 1B in the game) must be blamed for his clumsiness...
    
    MrT(wins)
 | 
| 3.556 | like Bob said | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:58 | 9 | 
|  |     It's become apparent that the young Braves are in over their haids
    in this Series.  They're just happy to be there and that's a good
    outlook for them to take.  Now that they're in the Series they should
    just smile and be positive and enjoy it all and let the veteran Twins
    (who've been there before) take care a it all.
    
    Yes, they should just lay back and enjoy it...
    
    MrT(wins)
 | 
| 3.557 | Another brainwash job... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:08 | 21 | 
|  |     
>    Gant's momentum clearly carried him off the bag.  Shoddy baserunning
>    on his part.  A course, *then* protocol dictates that poor Hrbie (the
>    best defensive 1B in the game) must be blamed for his clumsiness...
     
    Huh?  Never thought I'd read such tripe from an "objective analyst",
    but then again we're talking about someone who's steadfastly refused 
    to address the subject of the hypocrisy of his sudden love for the 
    Twins, in light of past criticisms of their entire operation and 
    league.  The stuff's really starting to get deep in here...
    
    For what it's worth, from the replays I saw Gant *maybe* would have 
    come off the bag had Herbie not interfered, but it did look like
    Gant switched feet on the bag and was going to maintain contact, 
    however tenuously.  Once Hrbek interfered, however, that becomes a 
    moot point.  Hrbek clearly brought the glove up and Gant's leg with
    it.  It's not the umpire's job to guess what would have happened
    in the absence of such interference.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.558 | Quit Cheating And Play The Friggen Game !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:14 | 10 | 
|  |      It is obvious that the Braves are in over their respective heads.
    I am pulling for the Twins to win this thing but I found it pretty
    tough to do after the crap Hrbeck pulled at 1st base.  I don't know
    about you boys and girls but I was always taught that it's not
    whether you win our lose but how you play the game.....  I sure 
    wouldn't sleep well knowing I cheated in the biggest of big games.
    Although it doesn't look like they will,  I hope the Braves make
    it an interesting series !!
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.559 |  | CAM::WAY | Ain' no sunshine when she's gone | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:46 | 18 | 
|  | I tend to agree with Big Game.
The way the play looked to me, Gant looked as if he would stay on the
bag.  Yes, he was off-balance, but I didn't think his leg would come
off.
Hrbek on the other hand, did what a lot of Sportsmen do.  He pushed
the rules to the absolute limit, and got the call he wanted.
I do that on the rugby pitch every chance I can.  If I'm in the lineout,
I'll barge and barge and barge until I get called.  If I'm throwing in,
I'll shade it towards my team until it gets called.  Hrbek did the
same thing.  He pulled the guys leg, but got a favorable call.
That's the way I saw it, and I'm not particularly going for anyone
in this series, I'm just waiting for it to be over......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.560 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Mon Oct 21 1991 20:08 | 23 | 
|  |     I cain trufefooly say that so far, I've watched no more than 1/3 inning
    of the Worldly Serious.
    
    I flew into Pittsburgh Saturday afternoon from Colorado Springs(boy my
    arms were tired).  After having my wife and 3 curtain climbers meet me
    at the airport, getting re-acquainted with all 4 of them, and finally
    getting to the old homestead, we had dinner and after some "TV" time,
    put the kiddies to bed.  Tally, went thru 35 gallons of "Veinerschlider
    50"....'nuff said!!
    
    Sunday, took the kiddies to WQED for the open house so's they could
    visit the real "Mr. Rogers" place.  Taped the Steelers game(tape is now
    in the trash, couldn't stand the thought of re-using something with
    that abomination of a game on it), went out to dinner, then home, put
    the kiddies to bed and finished off the rest of the 55 gallon drum of
    "veinerschlider 50".  Couldn't waste 2 perfectly good nights watching
    the worldless series!!!
    
    Anybody know where I cain get recapped??????
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.561 | Go Braves!  Do it for *REAL* baseball! | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Mon Oct 21 1991 20:09 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.562 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Mon Oct 21 1991 23:42 | 86 | 
|  |     
    >>                  <<< Note 3.519 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
    >>      -< Reaction from Pittsburgh has been sad and disappointing >-
    
    >>Why is all of this invective being hurled exclusively at Bonds and
    >>Bonilla, too?  What about Van Slyke?  Why is he such a sacred cow?  The
    >>guy's the highest paid player on the team, has already got his money
    >>instead of just waiting to get it, and admitted that he didn't set the 
    >>stage for the 3-4-5 slots and just didn't get it done (after Game 1
    >>he was just as much an automatic out as the guys who followed).  I'll 
    >>go on record as saying that if Bonds ends up walking (Bonilla's already 
    >>gone) in part because the Pirates decided to pay Van Slyke $4 million a 
    >>year over a longterm contract, they decided on the wrong guy.  I like
    >>Slick, but he's no Bonds, and at $4 million is overpaid by MLB standards.
    >>You might like his "attitude", for whatever that's worth, but it will be 
    >>no substitute for production.  
    
    Glenn,
    
    On the field, BOnds is an asset, but once off of the filed, he becomes
    a liability.  Go back to lasted year's NLCS, when Jeff King was
    injured(back problems which kept him out most of this year also). 
    Bonds flaps his jaws about King not playing hurting the club.  What
    does Bonds do to help in that NLCS, hit somewhere around .183.  This
    year, he kept his big mouth shut for a while, but every time he stepped
    into the batter's box, he swung for the fences, trying to be the hero,
    instead of just trying to hit the ball, and hits, AGAIN, below .200. 
    Afterwards, he accuses the media of putting him under a microscope. 
    He's the jerk who didn't hit.  It was in the NLCS, nationally
    televised.  Overall, he is bad for team moral with some of the day to
    day BS he spews.
    
    Bonilla, on the other hand, when asked what he thought of Van Slyke's
    performance following game one, jumped down the reporter's throat,
    accusing him of trying to make Van Slyke out to be a superstar.  Sour
    Grapes over Van Slyke's contract?????  You tell me.
    
    Both Bonds and Bonilla have been holding the contract BS over the Bucs
    mgmt head all year long, with Bonds continually making threats to be
    gone after nexted year.  
    
    I don't have the exact stats in front of me, but let's compare Van
    Slyke and Bonilla.  Van Slyke hit in the low .260's this year, with 17
    HR's and 83 RBI.  Bonilla hit right about .300, with 18 homers and 100
    RBI.  Edge to Bonilla.  40 points on the average. Where Van Slyke has
    it over Bonilla HANDS DOWN is defense.  Slyke can run circles around
    Bonilla in outfield range, and in his throwing accuracy, too.  Bonilla
    is slow on the bases,  Van Slyke is a base stealing threat.  the $4 mil
    plus that Van Slyke gets is a bit on the high side, but you take Van
    Slyke out of the Pirate line-up, and CF goes to hell.  Van Slyke missed
    some games this year and while he was out, a couple of the games were
    lost on hits to center that Van Slyke would have made routinely, but
    whoever the bum of the day was in center field couldn't track down.
    Bonilla would be best suited as a first baseman, but may need a bit of
    work to succeed at it.  If I had to choose between keeping Bonilla and
    playing him in right field, or keeping Van SLyke and having him play
    center, Bonilla would have his plane reservations already. 
    
    What the Pirates should do with the Bonds situation, if Larry Doughty
    is smart, and there are many here in Pittsburgh who think he's not, is
    trade Bonds now, while his stock is up.  Get a starter(LF or RF) for
    him, and a couple of young prospects, and throw his going away party
    after his plane leaves.  Bonds is a little kid in a man's body.
    
    Bonilla will probably get huge bucks this winter, but he's just a
    slightly above average ball player, at best.  He's not worth more than
    $2.5-3.0mil/year, but he'll get almost twice that.  As far as Bonds
    goes, once he gets a "big bucks" contract, I look for him to do what
    Dave Parker did when he got his huge contract in Pittsburgh, FALL FLAT
    ON HIS FACE!!!!!  it'll go to Bonds head and he'll drown in himself for
    a year or two afterward.
    
    Another thing the Bucs should do, tell Jim Leyland that they'll double
    his salary and give him a gauranteed 5 year contract with an
    exclusivity clause in it.  Manage the Bucs, or no one for the nexted
    five years.  Leyland has, with help from Syd Thrift and Larry
    Dorky...er...I mean Doughty, built this team.  he's been the major
    factor for the Bucs having the best record in baseball during the
    regular season, and making the playoffs the lasted 2 years.  It was his
    big bats that let him down and kept the Bucs from being up 2-0 over the
    Twinkies right now.  Above all, KEEP LEYLAND!!!
    
    'nuff for now
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.563 | Atlanta celebrates T's KOD! | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Tue Oct 22 1991 09:04 | 8 | 
|  | >    poor Hrbie (the
>    best defensive 1B in the game) 
    
    I recall six months ago T making a claim that Casey was the best goalie
    in hockey.  After this, he was pulled in the remaining three games due
    to his ineffectiveness and the Penguines won the Stanley Cup.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.564 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 22 1991 10:39 | 7 | 
|  | 	You know, the way Poor MrT has been staggerin' around on this 
designated geek issue, like a rummy swinging from a street lamp, one has to 
question the main's stability.  MorT, I's worried about ya'.
				/Don
P.S. Go Braves!  Win it for *real* baseball!!
 | 
| 3.565 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 22 1991 12:27 | 13 | 
|  |     There is no hypocrisy in my rooting for the Twins.  Explain your charge,
    Waugamain, and I'll answer it.  But for now, you're just blowing hot
    air, just so much bluster.
    
    As for Hrbie, he's generally considered the best defensive 1B in the
    game.  The only reason he hasn't been winning Gold Gloves in the past
    is cuz a a certain pocked-face violence-prone whiner who hits .197 and
    steals basks in Gilt by Association and a 49 rabbit ball homer year...
    
    But the gig's up on him now.
    
    MrT
    
 | 
| 3.566 | Time to smoke this varmint out... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:07 | 36 | 
|  |     
    > As for Hrbie, he's generally considered the best defensive 1B in the
    > game.  The only reason he hasn't been winning Gold Gloves in the past
    > is cuz a a certain pocked-face violence-prone whiner who hits .197 and
    > steals basks in Gilt by Association and a 49 rabbit ball homer year...
    Truly an injustice, but McGwire has affected Hrbek in exactly *one* year
    of his ten-year career.  And while Hrbek is certainly a fine fielder
    (and with Joyner probably one of the two the best in the AL), the
    "best in the game" claim belies MrT's professed knowledge and 
    preference for the Senior Circuit, where Mssrs. Clark and Grace reside,
    superior fielders both.
    
    > There is no hypocrisy in my rooting for the Twins.  Explain your charge,
    > Waugamain, and I'll answer it.  But for now, you're just blowing hot
    > air, just so much bluster.
                          
    Bailiff:     Doyousweartotellthetruththewholetruthandnothinngbutthetruth
                 sohelpyouGod?
    
    Defendant:   I do. 
    (MrT)            
    
    Prosecutor:  Have you at any time in the past suggested that a 
    (Waugamain)  sub-standard Minnesota Twins' franchise might serve as a 
                 suitable candidate for bringing the great game of
                 baseball to the more deserving city of Denver, Colorado?
                 
    Defendant:   Um, er, hem, haw...
    
    Prosecutor:  Answer the question, please, sir!
    
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.567 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:00 | 16 | 
|  |     Defendant:  Yes, I have in the past, and continue at this time, state
                that each and every ALmost League franchise is substandard
                in terms a the product put on the field from the standpoint
                a quality and esthetics, which are critical to a non-action
                thinking main's game such as baseball.
    
                And no, you ain't even explicated how this in any way shape
                or form constitutes hypocrisy on my part in connnection with
                me rooting for the Twins in this World Series.  
    
    	        So, Mr. Persecutor, if they ain't even a question axed (and
                there isn't), then I ain't guilty a hypocrisy.
    
    	        But *you* are hereby found Guilty of non-pacific blabber !!
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.568 | Very serious charge, SPORTS' hypocrisy... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:17 | 23 | 
|  |     
>        Defendant:  Yes, I have in the past, and continue at this time, state
>                that each and every ALmost League franchise is substandard
>                in terms a the product put on the field from the standpoint
>                a quality and esthetics, which are critical to a non-action
>                thinking main's game such as baseball.
 
    Prosecutor:  Irrelevant!  Moving an AL franchise from Minnesota
                 to Denver would not in any way improve the esthetics
                 of ALmost League baseball, unless you were implying
                 that the Minnesota Twins were in some way deficient
                 even by ALmost League standards!  Is it not hypocrisy
                 for a Minnesota native who once suggested that major
                 league baseball would be better off without a team 
                 there (but instead with a team in Denver) to adopt the 
                 moniker MrT(wins) upon said team's arrival in the 
                 postseason, and additionally to generally carry on like 
                 a lovesick schoolboy over the newfound success of "his"
                 Minnesota Twins?!  *That* is the question, and the 
                 accusation before you that you must refute...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.569 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:20 | 9 | 
|  | Gentlemen, Gentlemen....
You didn't ask permission to have a Trial in here.
Even in the REAL world, you gots to get a date on the docket.  You
just cain't usurp a courtroom and get going at it.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.570 | T's even too ashamed to use the AL topic, has to blab here | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:23 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.571 | Shaddup 'Saw.  This is better 'n CourTV. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:27 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.572 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:48 | 4 | 
|  | >                 -< Shaddup 'Saw.  This is better 'n CourTV. >-
I'm the DocketMaster.  If you wanna get a courtroom, ya hafta ask
permission!
 | 
| 3.573 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:02 | 9 | 
|  |                    <<< Note 3.572 by CAM::WAY "Go Wahoos!" >>>
>                 -< Shaddup 'Saw.  This is better 'n CourTV. >-
>> I'm the DocketMaster.  If you wanna get a courtroom, ya hafta ask
>> permission!
  IMPEACH the DocketMaster NOW!!!!!!1111111111
 | 
| 3.574 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:04 | 5 | 
|  |     THHHHHHHHHPPPPPPTTTTTTTTTTT !!!!!!!!!
    
    I Taut I Taw I Putty Tat !!!!
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.575 | yawn | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:07 | 11 | 
|  |     >the accusation before you that you must refute...
    
    What accusation?  You ain't accused me a a damned thing.  It's 
    still up to you to explicate any connection between my high browed
    denunciation of the Designated Geek, Turf, and domes, and my perfectly
    understandable boosterism for the Twins, who are clearly the best team
    in the game.
    
    When you do that, *if* you do that (and you won't), then let's talk.
    
    MrT(win Twins WIN !!)
 | 
| 3.576 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:09 | 5 | 
|  | 
 Speaking of Hoot, anyone else fondly remeber the assination threats against
 BO in Arrowhead???
 ;^()
 | 
| 3.577 | How about a little spam with them eggs MorT? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:11 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.578 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:14 | 6 | 
|  |     	Hey Mike that was truly a ::SPORTS classic.  I remember him
    saying how if you didn't have a satellite dish you missed Bo putting
    on what looked like a bullet proof vest because the networks censored
    that out.  That was HOOT at his best (or worst).  8^)
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.579 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:25 | 19 | 
|  |     >How about a little spam with them eggs MorT?
    
    Everybody's a smartass.  If you *must* know the menu for the fete 
    we have planned for our World Series Championship Party:
    
    - Heineken
    - Maison de Puy brie
    - Pontet Canet bourdeaux (1976)
    - St. Lo Camembert
    - Perrier (natural flavor)
    - Pepperidge Farms Goldfish (cheddar)
    - Caspian sturgeon caviar
    - Stone ground crackers
    - Baguette loaves (du Hotel Sofitel)
    - Pate du Terrine
    
    This would be in suite #117, to be sure.
    
    MrT(wins! Twins !!  TWINS !!!)
 | 
| 3.580 | What, no Oreos ??? | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:34 | 5 | 
|  | �    - Pepperidge Farms Goldfish (cheddar)
    
 Wow, classy spread there, T ...
    
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.581 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:38 | 9 | 
|  | MrT....
I'm surprised at you!  Everyone knows that no spread is complete without
a little Old No 7, Jack Daniels!
Nothin' says lovin' like somethin' from Lynchville.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.582 |  | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Oct 22 1991 15:43 | 6 | 
|  |     That spread deserves snifters of brandy with fine Cuban cigars fer
    the post-feast palate. Don't forget the grey Poupon strictly for show.
    Are you being chauffered?  Tres chic
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.583 | I'm mortified! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:08 | 2 | 
|  |       Whot, no Ding Dongs!!!
                                         Denny
 | 
| 3.584 | First MrT sells out on local brethren, then crashes their party | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:14 | 13 | 
|  |     
    Well, you're right of course, MrT, and I apologize.  There's nothing
    hypocritical about your backing of the Twins.  It's just too bad 
    they hadn't moved to Denver as was your wish and weren't preparing 
    to celebrate their supremacy within the confines of Mile High. 
    Would have been a damn sight easier on the eyes and ears a all of us, 
    no question.  But then you wouldn't have had the privilege of 
    "attending" this game from your "corporate box", and nor would you
    have had the chance to fraudulently imbibe of all a this swollen
    Minnehaha civic pride, now would ya?
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.585 |  | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | This *IS* my day job... | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:26 | 11 | 
|  |     We interrupt the Galloping Gourmet for a note about the game.  Although
    I still think the Twins will win the war, I like the Braves chances in
    tonight's battle.  Getting back to Fulton County Stadium has to give
    Atlanta a boost, as will having Avery on the mound.  I'll predict 3-1
    Bravos, Justice 2-run HR the big blow.
    
    However, if the Braves drop this one T may as well pop the cork on the
    Pontet Canet...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.586 | Go Twins ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:46 | 12 | 
|  |     
     Although I am rooting for the Twin's I for one am not counting the
    Braves out of it yet.  Everyone I know had the Pirates going to the
    Serious when the Braves went to the Steel City down 3 to 2.  The 
    Braves are young and talented, they could "Shock The World" as Ali
    put it and I may not feel to bad about the lose after the crap Hrbek
    pulled at 1st base the other night.....  What goes around comes around.
    The Braves will take this to a Minimum of 6 games...  and win it all
    if it goes 7.....
    
    Big Game (Who's still riled about Hrbek's stunt)
    
 | 
| 3.587 | curiouser | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Tue Oct 22 1991 17:54 | 19 | 
|  | >    - Heineken
>    - Maison de Puy brie
>    - Pontet Canet bourdeaux (1976)
>    - St. Lo Camembert
>    - Perrier (natural flavor)
>    - Pepperidge Farms Goldfish (cheddar)
>    - Caspian sturgeon caviar
>    - Stone ground crackers
>    - Baguette loaves (du Hotel Sofitel)
>    - Pate du Terrine
>    
>    This would be in suite #117, to be sure.
    
    MrT, will Biff and Muffy be there too?
    So how come you root for a team that does not practice all the purities
    of baseball that you hold dear to your heart?
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.588 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Tue Oct 22 1991 21:09 | 9 | 
|  |     >>So how come you root for a team that does not practice all the purities
    >>of baseball that you hold dear to your heart?
    
    Mike, cin you say
    
    HIPPO-critter?????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.589 | perfect Bucco synopsis! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Tue Oct 22 1991 22:47 | 9 | 
|  |     RE: .562
    
    I absolutely totally agree with every comment.  I have wanted to say
    exactly the same thing without the typing:^)
    
    The Pirates, I understand, have given Leyland permission to talk to 
    the White Sox:^(
    
    Rick
 | 
| 3.590 | It's right there on page 75. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Oct 23 1991 08:18 | 9 | 
|  | 
After consulting my copy of the MoRT Translation Guide, the spread is 
as follows:
Twinkies and Bosco.
Steve
 | 
| 3.591 | NLers prevail in classic NL-style battle! | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 23 1991 09:30 | 37 | 
|  |         
    Very tense game last night, and more than just a little bit sloppy
    on both sides, especially the Braves.  Kid Avery, in spite of
    the score, pitched brilliantly again and deserved better.  Only
    Puckett's home run was his fault; the other two runs credited to
    him were due to Dave Justice's misplay in the first and Terry
    Pendleton's boot in the eighth.  Combined with Mark Lemke's
    near-disastrous muff of a tailor-made DP ball in the twelfth, it 
    was the guys with the good reps on defense that nearly let this one 
    get away.
    
    Dave Justice nearly single-handedly showed the Twinks how NL baseball
    is played in the bottom of that twelfth inning.  Single, easy steal
    off of Brian Harper (who wouldn't be-- and in fact wasn't-- allowed 
    any closer than 90 feet to the starting backstop position in the
    Senior Circuit, what with his spam-like arm), and beautiful dash
    and slide to the plate on a very short single to left off the
    bat of the bailed-out goat Lemke.  Gladden's throw was weak and
    a little off to the third-base side, and that was all the room 
    Justice needed...
    
    A little extra special thanks to the studly Kent Hrbek for properly
    demonstrating how to keep the bat firmly glued to the shoulder in
    crucial at-bats, on order to best coax an umpire's call on perfectly 
    good pitches...
    How many of you Twins' fans (and you too MrT) *really* wanted to see 
    Rick Aguilera, who in spite of his relative hitting talents hadn't had 
    an at-bat since the first half of 1989, up to the plate with the
    bases loaded and two outs in that fateful twelfth inning?  Methinks
    that Tom Kelly, sporting a deeper non-pitcher bench than the Braves,
    may have made one move to many in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh.
    What was that you were saying about NL managing and rocket science,
    Tom?  
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.592 | ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Wed Oct 23 1991 09:53 | 11 | 
|  |     Tom Kelly was truly outmanaged last night.  There's just no excuse for
    having a pitcher bat with bases loaded in extra innings.
    
    Avery's ERA is lower than it should be.  Pendleton's error only ensued
    because the ump made a bad call on Avery's apparent ball four pitch. 
    That ball was low AND outside.  How he called it a strike I'll never
    understand.  Otherwise, same two-run result.
    
    And I'm dog tired after staying up for that one.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.593 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 23 1991 10:08 | 6 | 
|  |     	But let's be fair to Kelly.  It's like teaching a kid the alphabet,
    letting him go ten years without ever reading anything then expecting
    a book report about War And Peace.  You cain't apply skills you
    never get a chance to use.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.594 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Wed Oct 23 1991 10:58 | 36 | 
|  |     Great game lasted night.  Thank God for the West Coast - game over at
    9:30 or thereabouts...
    
    Lots of chances for second guessing.
    
    First, on the Twins side, we have Tom Kelly doing his Dean SMith
    imitation, substituting and changing players like he was coaching
    hockey.  No way do you get forced into having to let the pitcher bat in
    a crucial spot.  Why oh why did he pinch hit Newman for Pags???  I
    don't care what Pags average is - let him swing, cuz with one swing, he
    can change the game.  Newman has zero power.  ALso, as stated earlier,
    it wastes a guy.  Also, as noted earlier, the double switch backfired
    by taking the bat out of Kirby's hand.   Kent Hrbek must be thinking of
    being a model for a scuptor.  Hey KENT - wake up and at least SWING the
    lumber!
    
    On the Braves side - I was second guessing Cox all night, but the
    Braves won.  My first "WHADDAYADOIN!" was when he took Avery out.  Felt
    it wasn't the right time.  One more batter.  Second was when he brought
    in Pena - I had a bad feeling.  I don't know why he replaced Mercker
    when he did - he was going to walk Puckett - why not let Mercker do it,
    and I was nervous when he brough in CLancy - a junkballer to face
    Aggie.  THought Aggie would hit something that didn't break.
    
    Why oh why does Ron Gant swing on the first pitch in crucial
    situations?  ALso, Ronny was really pushing out there - resulting in
    lots of pop ups.
    
    The twins have taken advantage of every miscue by the Braves - until
    the 12th last night.  Perhaps that's the turnaround.  THey made a
    mistake and lived, they beat the other guys stud reliever. They won a
    game started by Avery that Avery didn't have to be perfect in.
    
    Great game.  
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.595 | Reprinted from the BASEBALL conference | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:17 | 25 | 
|  |  Great game ... I really thought the Twins were going to break hearts all
 over Dixie when they came back and tied it off the previously untouchable
 Avery *and* Pena.
 
 I like Tom Kelly's style.   Yeah, he left himself short-handed at game's
 end but he was going to fire *all* his guns no matter what.   Yes, you can
 question each of the individual moves but there's no question that he was
 playing for the win in each and every situation.   I like that and I think
 the Twins will ultimately win the Series for it.
 
 That plus Kelly and his players usually do the little things right.   It
 looks like they've got "the book" on each of the Braves hitters and their
 defensive positioning is just about perfect ... remember when Gant lined
 out to Gagne to end a late inning ... perfect placement.    Yes, McCarver
 thought that Puckett was too deep on a few occasions but it didn't kill
 the Twins.
 
 Braves have huge hearts.    Both Avery's and Pena's bubbles were burst and
 they still hung in there and won it.    Their little guys are doing a
 great job.   Olson is the gutsiest player on either team and Lemke and
 Belliard are hanging right in there, too.
 
 Great great baseball.   Twins look very very good.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.596 | best game since 86's game 6 | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:45 | 17 | 
|  |     As JD said, thank God for the West Coast.  I was in bed by 10 ;-)
    
    Awesome game!  I only missed the first 3 innings, but it was well worth
    staying up for.  Glad to see the Braves win for *REAL* baseball!
    I also believe Kelly overmanaged and hung himself because of it.  
    
    I didn't disagree with yanking Avery.  His last 4 batters really tagged
    him hard.  He probably just didn't have it last night.  Pendleton gave
    them the tie, and CBS's graphic on Pe�a's hitless streak didn't help ;-)
    It seems they always jinx people that way.
    
    Stanton was impressive in his relief performance.  He really quieted
    the Twins down.
    
    Hopefully Smoltz will pull things even tonight.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.597 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 23 1991 12:40 | 22 | 
|  | 	I agree that Avery was losing it and today's GLOB had the stats for 
the Braves' Big Three (Avery, Smoltz and Glavine) pitching on three day's 
rest and it ain't good.  I always wondered why teams insist on using a 
fifth starter (how many quality fifth starters can you name?) instead of 
using only four.  It could start at the minor league level and by the time 
these picthers reach the majors they could be strong enough to pitch on 
three days rest.  It's my belief that most of today's young pitchers can't 
pitch on three days rest because they never have.
	As an example take JD and his forklift driver's job.  Let's assume 
he lifts 1000 lbs. a day.  Now if every once and a while he as to lift say 
1500 lbs. he would probably be a little tired, but if he lifted that 1500 
lbs. every day he would get stronger and be able to handle the load daily. 
Of course everyone has a physical limit, but getting back to pitchers, 
since pitching on three days rest was done before successfully, there is no 
reason to believe it can't be done again.  Now while offensive statistics 
would probably suffer and jobs would be lost (causing the Players Union to 
howl) the aesthetic quality of the game would be raised.  And in these days 
of domed stadiums and Glad Bag outfield fences, anything that increases the 
quality of the product can't be considered a negative.
				/Don
 | 
| 3.598 | Avery progressing to another plane... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 23 1991 12:49 | 20 | 
|  |     
>    I didn't disagree with yanking Avery.  His last 4 batters really tagged
>    him hard.  He probably just didn't have it last night.  Pendleton gave
>    them the tie, and CBS's graphic on Pe�a's hitless streak didn't help ;-)
>    It seems they always jinx people that way.
 
    This really tells you something about the standard that young Avery
    is already being judged by.  First batter, Gladden, reaches on a 
    fairly well hit fly ball that should have been caught.  Avery proceeds
    to sit down the next *fifteen* batters in succession.  Gives up a
    couple of singles in the sixth, but no harm done as Hrbek's long fly 
    ball goes for naught.  Gives up hard-hit homer to Puckett in seventh, 
    and indeed does show signs of tiring on some other hard hit balls. 
    But still, I thought he pitched an excellent game on the whole,
    and the reason it wasn't recorded as such was because the Twins
    got to Pena whereas the Pirates didn't touch him (Avery didn't 
    complete either of two shutouts against the Bucs, either).
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.599 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 23 1991 13:12 | 5 | 
|  | > Of course everyone has a physical limit, but getting back to pitchers, 
    
      Come on Slasher, are you trying to tell us you have a limit on
    pitchers!! You cain only take so much a that Old Milwaukee eh?!
                                             Denny  8^o
 | 
| 3.600 | spells fatigue or lack of the right stuff to me | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 23 1991 13:21 | 5 | 
|  |     I don't care who the pitcher is, I would've yanked him too.  Puckett
    hit one out, 2 others hit to the warning track, and another hit one on
    a rope to the centerfielder.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.601 |  | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 23 1991 13:40 | 13 | 
|  |     
>    I don't care who the pitcher is, I would've yanked him too.  Puckett
>    hit one out, 2 others hit to the warning track, and another hit one on
>    a rope to the centerfielder.
 
    Sorry, Mike, didn't want to make it sound like I was disagreeing 
    about Avery coming out.  I thought it was time, too.  I was
    only responding to the "just didn't have it last night" comment.
    If that kind of a performance is "not having it", the kid's got
    a very bright future indeed...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.602 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:00 | 30 | 
|  |     You people leave me alone with these hypocrisy allegations.  Look,
    my position is simple, I aim a victim a circumstances.  Criticizing
    me is not unlike a rabbi busting a orthodox for eating a slab of bad
    meat when faced with starvation.
    
    Speaking a vittles, Mike, what kind a show would putting out Grey
    Poupon be?  A show a bad taste, maybe.  Our moutard will be Maille,
    and only Maille, thank you.
    
    re: The Game
    
    The game, the best Series game in a loooong time, is an object lesson
    on why the Designated Geek should be done away with immediately.  The
    phone lines on the radio talk shows in Mpls. were burning with Twins
    fans commenting on how "interesting" and "fascinating" the game was.
    
    TK has to be mortified that he shot his mouth off yesterday with that
    "rocket science" comment, ending up later that night with a pitcher 
    batting in the five hole and a whole lotta egg on his face.
    
    Classic game.  GOT to luv the NL's more exciting brand a baseball, 
    and has anybody noticed how many exciting games the Braves have been
    involved in since the stretch drive (a classic itself) started?  
    
    re: Atlanta fans
    
    Classy.  First they trash a innocent billboard, then a death threat
    to Hrbie's ma, then a death threat to Hrbie's sister.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.603 |  | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:14 | 20 | 
|  |           
>    You people leave me alone with these hypocrisy allegations.  Look,
>    my position is simple, I aim a victim a circumstances.  Criticizing
>    me is not unlike a rabbi busting a orthodox for eating a slab of bad
>    meat when faced with starvation.
     
    A perfect analogue, MrT.  Perfect.  The Minnesota Twins and a slab
    of bad meat.  Glad we could clear that up...
    
>    Classy.  First they trash a innocent billboard, then a death threat
>    to Hrbie's ma, then a death threat to Hrbie's sister.
     
    A buddy of mine and I were commenting today at lunch that Atlanta must 
    be the Boston a the South!  Gotta luv it.  Up in Minnesota the fans 
    don't say boo they're so squeaky clean, and down in 'Lanta the
    Tomahawkers are taking spray paint cans to a billboard situated in the 
    lobby of one of their most posh hotels!
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.604 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:39 | 14 | 
|  |     On my comment about pulling Avery.  It probably was the  right thing,
    percentage-wise, but I had a feeling he could get out of the inning. 
    But, I'm not a manager, and it was easy from my couch in Seattle to
    yell at Cox to keephimindamnit!
    
    The Braves pitchers struck out 13 twins last night - not a bad job -
    even for extra innings.
    
    Another move I didn't agree with was pinch hitting Hunter for Bream
    late in the 10th inning.  Another hunch.  I had a vision of Bream
    winning the game on a dinger - and then he's pinch hit for.  So much
    for ESP!
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.605 | where's my violin... | HAVASU::HEISER | singing thru your fingers | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:01 | 3 | 
|  |     Re: starvation
    
    kind of like Matt Sewell huh?
 | 
| 3.606 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:08 | 1 | 
|  |     How many of those 13 Ks came against Minny pitchers?
 | 
| 3.607 |  | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R |  | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:18 | 13 | 
|  | 	I have to agree with T about the idiocy of the "fans" of
	Atlanta who called Hrbek's mom and sister with threats.
	I suppose it won't be easy/possible to track 'em down, but
	it certainly does reflect on the problems some people have.
	Some people don't realize this is just a game.
	On the other hand, I don't know if I'd call a billboard
	"innocent" or not.  It seems to me from what I've hear/seen
	down here that it was hardly innocent.
	BTW, it seems that 2 radio personalities in Atlanta had encouraged
	this kind of activity (re the billboard) on the air.  They've been
	suspended from their radio station for the remainder of the Series.
 | 
| 3.608 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:21 | 2 | 
|  |       What's the story on the billboard? I musta missed that one.
                                 Denny
 | 
| 3.609 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:27 | 10 | 
|  |     
    Mac -
    
    Ericson is the only Minny pitcher to strike out.  Only 2 Minny pitchers
    batted all night.
    
    Hrbek and Mack and Puckett were k'd twice.  Other K victims were
    Gladden, Sorrento, Leus, Pags, Gagne and Bush...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.610 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 15:43 | 8 | 
|  |     FWIW,
    The Pirates fell 6,000 people short of setting the ALL-TIME attendance
    record for 4 games in a post season series.  If they had put 53k in 3
    Rivers instead of 47k, they'd own the record right now.  The record is
    held by the Dodgers, set in the Coliseum.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.611 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:33 | 8 | 
|  | 
So T,
 Are you having a good time hanging out in your sky box sipping Perrier watching
games 3,4 and 5 on a big screen tv in the Metrodome ?
Metz
 | 
| 3.612 | the billboard story is funny | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Oct 23 1991 17:12 | 19 | 
|  |     >kind of like Matt Sewell huh?
    
    You calling me a *Mike* Sewell, Bob?!
    
    Starvation is a hungry subject, and I'll tellya I'm hungering
    BIG-TIME for a World Series Title.  The Mantle.  Not the Micky
    kind a mantle, the robe-style Mantle.
    
    The Braves should just enjoy it all, regale in the glory and greatness
    a it all and the Twins should take care a the other arrangments and 
    wrap up a title and the Braves will just lay back and enjoy it like 
    Bob said.
    
    re a couple back
    
    Wake up and smell the roses, RaKe.  This is no time for you to be
    bragging up Pitssburgh/Pirates baseball fans...
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.613 | Correction | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Wed Oct 23 1991 20:30 | 18 | 
|  |     
    >>FWIW,
    >>The Pirates fell 6,000 people short of setting the ALL-TIME attendance
    >>record for 4 games in a post season series.  If they had put 53k in 3
    >>Rivers instead of 47k, they'd own the record right now.  The record is
    >>held by the Dodgers, set in the Coliseum.
    
    First, let me correct myself here, the Pirates would have set the NLCS
    record.  The All-Time post-season record IS held by the Dodgers, when
    they drew 3 crowds over 90,000 to the Coliseum in the 1959 World
    Series.
    
    Secondly, "T(werp)", no bragging, just reporting the numbers!!!And
    corrections when I report them wrong.  Can you say the same thing
    T(wisted)??????????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.614 | Whats the reason?? | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Thu Oct 24 1991 06:09 | 9 | 
|  | 
   >   What's the story on the billboard? I musta missed that one.
   >                              Denny
        Your not the only one. What did the billboard say that made them
    trash it?
                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.615 | Im not even a Baseball Fan and stayed up for the last 2 games | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS |  | Thu Oct 24 1991 07:50 | 3 | 
|  |     Bottom of the ninth.....Sac Fly..Atlanta Ties it at 2 apiece.
    They have to start these games a little earlier.
    								MaB
 | 
| 3.616 | Hey MorT, I think the Braves are *enjoying it* now! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Thu Oct 24 1991 08:32 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.617 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 09:49 | 7 | 
|  |     >the Pirates would have set the NLCS record blah blah blaaah...
    
    Again, wake up call RaKe!  Earth to RaKe!  The Pirate feigns DID
    set an NLCS record: They had 7,000 to 15,000 empty seats (depending
    on whose estimate you believe) at an NLCS game, game 7 no less.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.618 | More heat deflectors than the space shuttle | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Thu Oct 24 1991 09:57 | 7 | 
|  |     What's this, T?  Using the Pittsburgh argument to detract from the
    glaring crash and burn your beloved (well, for the last few weeks anyway)
    Twins are beginning to deliver?
    Old news.
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.619 | they should ban DG, domes, Turf... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 10:11 | 7 | 
|  |     Excuse me, Dan'l.  Maybe you have one a them fliching wincing eye
    averting inferiority complexes typical to Pittsburgh feigns (who
    didn't show up and left early)... but this Series is not over.
    
    You give up to easy [sic].
    
    MrT(win TWINS)
 | 
| 3.620 | Partial re-print from BASEBALL | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 24 1991 10:17 | 49 | 
|  |                             
>    First, let me correct myself here, the Pirates would have set the NLCS
>    record.  The All-Time post-season record IS held by the Dodgers, when
>    they drew 3 crowds over 90,000 to the Coliseum in the 1959 World
>    Series.
    Well, in the interests of truth in advertising, there have only
    been three 7-game series in the NLCS, so for the time being such
    a record is practically meaningless.  Pittsburgh has now finished
    second in a three-horse race, and obviously stadium size has something
    to do with the equation.
        
    Another great game, only slightly less classic than Tuesday night's
    battle.  One thing I think that should be commented on was the fine job
    home plate umpire Terry Tata did last night on those three plays at the
    plate.  We usually only hear about the umps when they affect a game
    negatively, but this guy affected the game positively by leaving no 
    doubts in anyone's mind after it was over, when it would have been easy
    and understandable to have blown that last play.  That missed-tag
    call on Lemke was *not* an obvious one.  More often that not, you'll see 
    the call made based on contact.  But under the pressure of making the
    right decision at full speed in a "sudden-death" situation in an
    all-important World Series game, Tata picked out exactly what had
    happened.
    
    I've also got to give Tim McCarver his due.  Yeah, he talks too much
    and his sense of humor is the worst.  But he knows his baseball. 
    Tuesday night he foresaw the Aguilera pinch-hit a full inning in
    advance and reported it.  Last night he immediately commented on what
    had happened on Lemke's game-winning run, before any replays were shown
    (and even though the live shot from CBS was a horrible one-- we
    viewers couldn't see what the heck was going on).  The only thing I had
    to disagree with him on was the criticism he gave Lonnie Smith for
    getting thrown out at the plate in the fifth.  Smith was making the
    correct play.  Puckett misplayed that deep drive (bad jump), and with
    nobody out, Smith wanted first and foremost to make sure that he got 
    to third.  The rest was the third-base coach's bad decision-making.
    
    Tommy Lasorda should go back home.  He's a complete embarrassment, only
    slighty less so than Sparky Anderson doing those Domino's commercials
    for his boss.  After the game, Lasorda came on and repeated
    near-verbatim McCarver's analysis of the final play.  Before the game,
    Lasorda credited Olson's hustle in taking a double on that hit to 
    centerfield in front of Puckett as the key to the Braves' win.  Uh, 
    Tommy, did you go to bed early Tuesday night?  Olson didn't even score 
    that inning.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.621 | I was in the midst of Yuppie Brave Bandwaggon Warddlers | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Thu Oct 24 1991 10:33 | 9 | 
|  |     I watched the game in my neighborhood bar with the sound turned down. 
    I had the pleasure of not once hearing the chop chant.  But now Glenn
    comes in here and writes that McCarver actually said something worth
    noting.  Win some, you lose some.  
    BTW, just watching LaSorda with no sound I could tell he was saying
    something completely inane.
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.623 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:01 | 20 | 
|  |     Yeah, you have to adapt to his pseudo-intellectual puns, but Tim
    McCarver is the best analyst in the game by a wide margin, with 
    Kaat probably no. 2.  What holds Kaat back is that he primarily
    announces the Twins, and in the Designated Geeky ALmost league frankly
    there isn't that much to talk about from a game strategy standpoint.
    
    A huge debate is on in the Twin Cities about the Designated Geek.
    The antis are saying "but that's the most interesting Twins game I've
    ever seen" and the devos sticking to their guns "I followed the NL
    on cable this year and all I saw was a lot of 3-2 low scoring games
    and I'd rather see Chili Davis go up there and take his cuts instead
    of an automatic out" and similar drivel.
    
    Central to this issue is the fack that no devo that I've heard has 
    ever managed to explain exactly how a low scoring game is necessarily
    less exciting.  I would think that the key to adrenaline releases 
    and synapse fires is how close and stimulating the game is, not the
    total number of runs scored.
    
    MrT(wins Twins TWINS)
 | 
| 3.624 | Braves, Twins, Twins, Braves, I'm So Confused !! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:08 | 11 | 
|  |     
     This ones getting exciting....  I really want the MrT(wins) to
    pull this one out but I keep finding myself pulling for the Braves
    when watching the games.....  The Weather Vane could be effecting
    my loyalities.  What a great game lasted(tm) night.... I really
    won't watch B-Ball during the season but the `offs are very excitiing 
    and keep my attention....
    
    Go Braves,  Take it to seven
    
    Big game
 | 
| 3.625 |  | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:15 | 3 | 
|  |        Game seven will go haid-to-haid with Giamts-Skins on Sunday night.
    Better git new batteries for the remote!
                                             Denny
 | 
| 3.626 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:24 | 14 | 
|  |  > Central to this issue is the fack that no devo that I've heard has 
 >   less exciting.  I would think that the key to adrenaline releases 
 >   and synapse fires is how close and stimulating the game is, not the
 >  total number of runs scored.
    
	The problem isn't that there aren't enough runs scored it's that 
2 or 3 times a game you have to watch a pitcher bat.  It's not a pretty site
and personaly I don't find it exciting.  The other day Braves had runners
in scoring position (1 and 2nd)? two out and Glavine up early in the game.
What a waste of what could be a very exciting situation, instead it's ho-hum-
pitchers-batting, end of inning.
mc
 | 
| 3.627 | I hate 7-0  8-0 might kill me !! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:26 | 5 | 
|  |     Thats for Damn Sure.....  I hate to say this and I can hardly 
    beleive it's coming outa my mouth (or is that fingers) but go
    Midgets.... crush the Foreskins !!
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.628 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:30 | 19 | 
|  |      Another great game.  Watched it on TV, and had to catch some on the
    radio. 
    
    I thought the Braves were finished after the 5th inning let down and
    Pags' dinger.  But then Lonnie Smith absolutely *crushed* that ball.  
    Braves have to be a little happy with Smith and Pendleton getting two
    hits a piece - and a dinger each.
    
    Mike Stanton is pitching a whale of a series so far.  
    
    Is Pags' really that bad against lefties?  They guy was 3-3, and you
    pinch hit?  Oh well.  Is it time for Kelley to try someone else in
    right?  Mack is oh fer the series, and looking miserable.
    
    Is Saturday's game a 8:00 pm start?  I sure hope so.  I land in
    Manchester at about eight, and should make it to the hotel in time to
    catch most of the game...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.629 |  | COBRA::DINSMORE | Say goodnight to music | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:42 | 8 | 
|  |     big game hunter,
    
    GOOD TO SEE YA BACK IN HERE JACK, and i see youre rooting for
    
    AMERICAS TEAM. THE GIANTS  AGAINST THE FORESKINS.. good for you
    
    dinz
    
 | 
| 3.630 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:48 | 9 | 
|  | �    AMERICAS TEAM. THE GIANTS  AGAINST THE FORESKINS.. good for you
                                            ^^^^^^^^^
I would imagine that non-circumcised men would have a problem with 
this name, feeling that it's discriminatory in nature.....
'Saw    
 | 
| 3.631 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:57 | 1 | 
|  |     	I won't say anything if you don't 'Saw...
 | 
| 3.632 | I go to watch the manger, don't you? | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 24 1991 12:27 | 7 | 
|  | �What a waste of what could be a very exciting situation, instead it's ho-hum-
�pitchers-batting, end of inning.
    
    Mike, how much more excitement do you need?  Afterall, we get the
    cutaways to watch the manger scratch his head and try to decide to
    bunt, sub, or wait until next inning.  Such drama, such tension, such
    excitement.
 | 
| 3.633 |  | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Thu Oct 24 1991 12:29 | 4 | 
|  |     Hey, isn't ANYONE gotta tell us about the billboard incident, for
    cripes sake?  
    
    lEe
 | 
| 3.634 |  | COBRA::DINSMORE | Say goodnight to music | Thu Oct 24 1991 12:31 | 6 | 
|  |     Good question lee, i was wondering what happened to Chief Nocahoma?
    [sp]??
    
    dinz
    
    
 | 
| 3.635 | Go Braves!  Do it for *REAL* Baseball! | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Thu Oct 24 1991 12:56 | 5 | 
|  |     I was out last night, but listened to most of the game on the radio. 
    CBS radio has Vin Scully and Johnny Bench doing the games.  It would be
    great to have Vinny paired up with McCarver.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.636 | I didn't hear either.... | GEMVAX::HILL |  | Thu Oct 24 1991 13:03 | 1 | 
|  |     Yeah, so what about the billboard???
 | 
| 3.637 | The Billboard Incident | JARETH::MMEAGHER |  | Thu Oct 24 1991 13:04 | 4 | 
|  | Apparently there was a billboard with some 35,000 Twins' fans' signatures
set up at the hotel in question.  Braves fans were spray painting on
the billboard, and the hotel had it removed.  I think the Globe said that
there was paint damage to the area around the billboard/sign.
 | 
| 3.638 | Fork(lift) You | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Thu Oct 24 1991 13:27 | 8 | 
|  | >    Is Saturday's game a 8:00 pm start?  I sure hope so.  I land in
>    Manchester at about eight, and should make it to the hotel in time to
    
    You mean you're not driving the forklift cross countr?  What kinda
    manly man are you, JD?  
    
    	--dan'l
    
 | 
| 3.639 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Thu Oct 24 1991 14:22 | 13 | 
|  |     When Willard came up to pinch hit, and McCarver started rattling off
    all the places that Willard had played in the minors, I started
    thinking of the scene in Bull Durham when they are on the bus, and he's
    telling the kids about his time in the 'Show'.   I thought about
    Willard, on a bus somewhere next year or whenever, with young minor
    leaguers around him, as he tells them about the time he pinch hit in
    the WORLD SERIES in the SHOW and drove in the winning run.  
    
    Classic stuff.
    
    Man - that guy just about played everywhere!
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.640 | Go MiDgEtS.... JuSt ThIs TiMe !! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Thu Oct 24 1991 14:52 | 8 | 
|  |     Hey  DiNzY....   Good to hear from ya....  Thouoght you might
    have EnDed Up wIth HoFFa iN The mIdGets EndzOne fOr a WhiLe
    tHere...  hOw yoU BEen aNyHoW ???  I aM Only RoOting fOr The
    MidGets beCauSe tHey aRe PlAyinG tH Skins....  BTW I rETrAcT
    my statemeNt Regarding my NiCk naMe fOr The SkIns....  WouLdn'T
    waNt tO OFfenD aNy OnE.....
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.641 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 15:32 | 16 | 
|  |     >I weould imagine that non-circumcised men would have a problem
    >with this name, feeling that it's discirminatory in nature.....
    
    Damn right.  I as a uncircumcised human male found Dinsmore's 
    wisecrack offensive, obscene, humiliating, and discriminatory.
    
    How would you guys with pink bulbs like it if we natural men went
    off talking about Mushroom Sticks?
    
    re: billboard
    
    The vandalism took place soon after two DJs on Power 99 in Atlanta
    called out its location and urged that it be vandalized.  Within the
    hour the thing was trashed.  Must be a big-time radio station...
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.642 | Watch It !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Thu Oct 24 1991 15:38 | 3 | 
|  |     T....  that was pretty offensive...   ;^)  I'm Howling  !!!
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.643 | Now we know where "T" gets cheese for his crackers | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Thu Oct 24 1991 15:50 | 5 | 
|  |     
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.644 | Some frank talk about sex and sex parts | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 16:26 | 15 | 
|  |     RaKe, it sez a lot about your habits and expectancies pertaining
    to personal hygiene that you would automatically assume a hooded 
    snake would necessarily go uncleaned.  Funny thing, though, it's 
    a fack that natural men make better lovers.  Why?  Simple: The 
    glans goes protected by the hood, and many many nerve endings in 
    it are not inured by constant contact caused by rubbing with clothes.  
    When unsheathed, it's like a uncalloused finger, smooth, sensitive, 
    alert, feeling, ready to respond to the tiniest hint, the faintest
    signal, ready to learn, ready to please... 
    
    MrT
    MrT
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.645 | Dr. RuTh | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Thu Oct 24 1991 16:33 | 4 | 
|  |     T, please list references including names, phone numbers, dates, and
    times or else we ain't believin' this stunt either.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.646 | Dan'l's been listening to Voice of the Beehive, eh ? | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Thu Oct 24 1991 16:39 | 13 | 
|  | 
Was Jane doing the chop lasted night after she begged forgivness and swore to
never do it again?
I couldda sworn they cut to her and Ted and both were doing it. However they
had added an extra hook such that their hands came down on thier legs like they
were clapping hand to leg or something...maybe they were just doing touchy -
feeley stuff where the camera couldn't see them....
Hand check.....
Metz
 
 | 
| 3.647 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 24 1991 17:16 | 1 | 
|  |     T, take it to the Just Ask Jake topic...
 | 
| 3.648 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Thu Oct 24 1991 17:19 | 4 | 
|  |      Boy...  This conference is getting pretty close to the edge
    with that kind of talk.
    
    Big Game
 | 
| 3.649 | ;-) | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Thu Oct 24 1991 18:15 | 8 | 
|  |     What he's really saying is he couldn't please a real main's way without
    his built-in Maintain(tm). 
    
    Takes a real main to do it the old-fashioned way and still achieve
    great results and success.
    
    Thank you all,
    Mike
 | 
| 3.650 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Thu Oct 24 1991 19:39 | 27 | 
|  |     
    >>RaKe, it sez a lot about your habits and expectancies pertaining
    >>to personal hygiene that you would automatically assume a hooded 
    >>snake would necessarily go uncleaned.  
    
    No assumption of the sort made at all.  Just a brilliant deduction
    based on the BS you spew forth in this notesfile.  Can only ba caused
    by that.
    
    
    >>When unsheathed, it's like a uncalloused finger, smooth, sensitive, 
    >>alert, feeling, ready to respond to the tiniest hint, the faintest
    >>signal, ready to learn, ready to please... 
    
    The lightest touch of a right hand!!!!(or left if'n T is a southpaw)
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    MrT
    MrT
    
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.651 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Oct 24 1991 23:22 | 5 | 
|  |     Hey, don't blame *me* guys.  Dinsmore came in with talking foreskins
    and then the inimitable RaKe went off about haid cheese and all I
    did was straighten things out.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.652 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Thu Oct 24 1991 23:24 | 13 | 
|  |     
    >>								and all I
    >>did was straighten things out.                          
    
    >>MrT
    
    We're not concerned with what you did in the stall!!!!
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.653 | *AHEM* | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Fri Oct 25 1991 07:28 | 15 | 
|  |            <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.525               The National League (Baseball)               525 of 652
AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Doin' the Tomahawk Chop"             6 lines  21-OCT-1991 09:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
                                                                ^^^^^^
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.655 | Back to the Hump for more baggie-ball  :-( | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 09:21 | 20 | 
|  |     
    The Twins have got to be thanking their lucky stars that, like in
    1987, they've got four games of spamball in the Series at that 
    miserable, wretched Metrodome of theirs.  Once again, they've 
    *proven* that they're abject failures when it comes to playing our 
    national pastime, baseball, the way it's meant to be played.
    Discriminating baseball fans (minus MrT) won't forget that, 
    regardless of how this thing plays out.  
                      
    All was not a total loss last night, though.  Tom Kelly was finally
    able to make his peace with NL baseball, when, frustrated and frazzled
    from the two nights previous, he had his #3 hitter Kirby Puckett
    sacrificing in the fourth inning.  Sure, it was premature, foolish,
    stupid, and an obvious sign of overcompensation bordering on
    surrender, but at least they wouldn't be able to say that ol' Tom
    wasn't trying to "make something happen", the NL way.  Kudos, Tom!  
    (Haw, haw, haw...)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.656 | ooh, but he did it first | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 25 1991 09:41 | 7 | 
|  | �    Hey, don't blame *me* guys.  Dinsmore came in with talking foreskins
�    and then the inimitable RaKe went off about haid cheese and all I
�    did was straighten things out.
    
    There T goes again, refusing to take responsibility for his own actions
    (sounds like his "college prank").  Dinz was referring to a football
    team (and I thought he was kinder and gentler these days...)
 | 
| 3.657 | I have new respect (kind of) for Tommy | SHALOT::MEDVID | there are monsters there are angels | Fri Oct 25 1991 09:42 | 13 | 
|  |     I thought the highlight last night was when LaSorda came right out and
    said, "American League managers don't have to think.  They can call in
    their moves."
    
    Jack Buck turns around and says, "Tommy, you're not suggesting AL
    managers don't have to think strategy."
    
    "What do they have to think about?" LaSorda replied.
    
    All of a sudden, Tommy was gone.  That's right, CBS, as soon as someone
    is telling it like it is, shut him up.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.658 | Anyone care to spell out the T.H. CHOP? | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Fri Oct 25 1991 09:56 | 10 | 
|  | 
Yaiiiiiiiihahoyooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!
Hahayoo!! Ha ayayoooooooo.HA ha hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
What a scalpin! 8^)
Steve
 | 
| 3.659 | TKOD strikes again ... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:08 | 23 | 
|  | 	I think there may be some sort of delayed Mr.T(LOSEs)
	kiss-of-death.
	I seem to remember T jumping on the North Stars band wagon
	in the conference finals last spring.  The Stars were able to
	shake off the added strain against Edmonton, but in the next
	series they succumbed to the Penguins after an early series lead.
	Now, he jumps on the Twins band wagon just before the ALCS vs
	Toronto.  The light-hitting Blue Jays weren't able to take
	advantage of the situation, but here we are in the "finals" one
	series later, and the added strain of supporting T has caused
	the Twins to wear down as well.
	Gives you a lot more respect for Bobby Knight.  Look how well he
	has done all these years with the T.KOD hanging over him.  Of course,
	we all understand that while T has made predictions about the Twins
	and North Stars taking it all, he has never made such a prediction
	about the Hoosiers, 'cause they are a_flat-footed bunch, with no
	height, everyone out of position, etc., etc., etc., who couldn't
	make it through a season without the kindly, masterful Bob Knight
	at the helm.  I suppose if he actually predicts a Hoosiers champeenship,
	they'd choke as well.
 | 
| 3.662 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:32 | 5 | 
|  |     Twins have never won a World Series game on the road - lost all 3 in LA
    in 1965, 3 in St Louis in 1967 and 3 in Atlanta in 1991.  The only home
    WS Loss they've ever had was Game 7 to Koufax (on short rest) in 1965.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.663 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:33 | 4 | 
|  |     That 1967 in the previous note should of course be 1987.  Sorry.  Lousy
    lines to conference from here in Beffa (not to be confused with Meffa).
    
    John
 | 
| 3.664 |  | COBRA::DINSMORE | Say goodnight to music | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:42 | 7 | 
|  |     thanks tommy,youre right, i love that tune, but i do go to sleep
    
    with radio on.. good writing. must be the littleton air huh?
    
    
    dinz
    
 | 
| 3.666 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:52 | 5 | 
|  |     	From what Jo* told me about MrT's uh, girth when he jumps on
    a bandwagon it puts quite a strain on the suspension system.  Maybe
    that's why the wheels came off in Hotlanta?
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.667 | You could see his throat tighten=Deano | 56719::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Oct 25 1991 10:53 | 11 | 
|  |     Why Tommy,
    I believe that many of us( you and me included) have mucho writin'
    skills. I'm practicin' fer my next profession, beat writer for
    the National Enquirer. I cain butcher with best of dem.
    
    BTW,
    Good thing the Braves won 'cuz i was about ta call Glavine the
    "Roger Clemens" of the post-season.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.668 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:05 | 5 | 
|  |     Too bad CBS didn't show the crowd in the HHH Dome last night like they
    did in game 3.  Would've loved to see all those long-faced Twinkie fans
    sitting on their hands.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.670 | they all went home after the 4th... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:08 | 9 | 
|  |    >> Too bad CBS didn't show the crowd in the HHH Dome last night like they
   >> did in game 3.  Would've loved to see all those long-faced Twinkie fans
   >> sitting on their hands.
    
    Joe
	
 We're talking Twins' fan here Joe.
 mike
 | 
| 3.671 | Baseball's been *great*-- hope they retire the rest of the act | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:32 | 23 | 
|  |     
>               -< Wish the Braves phans would sit on their tomahawks... >-
 
    Gotta agree-- especially for a first-time thing where there should
    be nothing but fun involved for the fans for just being there for 
    once-- the behavior from the Atlanta fans has been disturbing.  
    Yeah, I understand that the death threats and the billboard thing 
    are the work of a very small but sick minority, but this constant 
    booing and taunting of Hrbek ("How do you spell fat boy? H-R-B-E-K"
    --they allowed that sign?) for doing nothing more than making a 
    major-league play (behind all the tomahawks and chanting do these 
    people have a clue about how the game of baseball is played?) and 
    what I perceive to be an antagonistic attitude on this Indian issue 
    from the newspapers and fans at the park (no matter which side of
    the issue you're on) is "fun" just taken a bit too far.  And of
    course, Ted and Jane have provided themselves to *everyone*-- 
    conservatives, liberals, Indians, non-Indians, baseball fans, baseball 
    haters, you name it-- as ready targets for scorn.  It's a circus
    outta control...
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.672 | Lighten up on both sides | GEMVAX::HILL |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:44 | 14 | 
|  |     Yeah, I have to agree it seems a little sophmoric of the Braves' fans
    to chant "Cheater, Cheater" when Hrbek gets up. Sure, boo the guy or
    whatever because he's the other team, but geez, if it was a Brave who
    made that play they would have cheered him. All he did was get away
    with a arguably shaky move. It wasn't as if he cheap-shotted someone or
    deliberately tried to injure another player, or even whined to the
    press. Give him a break!
    
    As for the tomahawk chop, I can understand how powerful it can be to be
    part of a huge throng of voices like that. More than anything else, it
    reminds me of how soccer crowds in Europe are always chanting or
    singing something during the game. Let 'em have their fun!
    
    Tom 
 | 
| 3.673 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Fri Oct 25 1991 11:47 | 13 | 
|  | 
	A Aaaaa Aaaaa Aaaaaaa
	Aaaa Aa Aa Aaaaaaa
(* 1000)
Damn, that is infectious.  Speaking strictly from a psychological
viewpoint, it's amazing how much those Indian chants stir inside
you, how very primal they can be....
Intense.....
 | 
| 3.674 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:03 | 7 | 
|  |     	Well at least the Twins feigns could use those HomerHankies
    as an expensive cryin' towel last night.
    
    				/Don
    
    P.S. I hope my good buddy MorT didn't get sick chowing down on that
          spam feast in the luxury box last night...
 | 
| 3.675 | Added reflections ... | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:15 | 60 | 
|  |  How come all the high-brow complaints about the Braves fans' behavior in
 the stands, their banners, and the high-profile owner and his equally
 famous fiancee ???
 
 There have been other teams whose fans have enjoyed the game as a
 coordinated group, most notably the Twins fans who all wave
 corporate-sponsored hankies.   
 
 And how about the 1979 Pirates with 50,000+ fans singing "We Are
 Fam-A-Lee" ???   Don't remember too many complaints about them not having
 a clue about how the game was played.
 
 And the "FATBOY" banner was truly classless, no doubt about it.   So why
 did CBS show it then ???   What brain-dead bozo in the CBS control truck
 whispered in the cameraman's ear to focus on the banner so he could punch
 it up for all to see ???
 
 And Ted and Jane are no more a "circus" act than Marge Schott and her late
 pooch were lasted year or ol' Charlie Finley and his green pennant-waving
 crew seen at all the early '70s A's post-season games.    Geez, remember
 when Finley "fired" Mike Andrews after he booted a crucial extra-inning
 play ???  And we saw plenty (too much) of Steinbrenner in all those
 Yankees games too.  Didn't he want to can a third base coach (Ferraro?)
 for waving Willie Randolph home when he should have held him ???
 
 Haven't seen Jane or Ted make a pitching change yet, have we ???
 
 The Braves have absolutely electrified Atlanta, the state of Georgia, the
 entire Southeast section of the country and a good deal of the rest of the
 free world, too.    Methinks the fans of other teams whose players are on
 the golf links right now are just a little green with envy.    Yes, it is
 true that the oh-so-knowledgeable fans of the Red Sox, the Yankees, the
 Reds, and so on would not be caught dead doing silly things like the wave
 or the chop or the hanky thing but I can assure you they'd all love to be
 in the Braves seat right now.
 
 The eerie resemblance to the 1987 Series is certainly there and the Braves
 need to prepare for it.   These nexted two games in the Dome are not at
 all easy despite all their momentum and the advantageous "on paper"
 pitching matchups.
 
 But there is another eerie "deja vu" going on here, too ... We're seeing
 the 1969 Amazin' Mets all over again.   Think about it ... 
 
 Three young pitching studs ... Seaver, Koosman, Gentry and Glavine, Avery,
 Smoltz.  Totally unexpected "little guy" heroes ... Al Weis and Mark
 Lemke.    Dismal recent past histories ... Mets and Braves last place
 finishes for several years.   And on and on ... Ron Gant looks like Tommy
 Agee out there sometimes.   The well-traveled Lonnie Smith is cranking
 dingers outta there like ol' Donn Clendenon did.
 
 Yes, the 1991 Twins are not the juggernaut that the 1969 Orioles were so
 the Braves aren't doing a David and Goliath thing here but their "miracle"
 is no less stunning.
 
 And, yes, I thought the Twins would win it easily after going up 2-0.  Now
 I ain't so sure.  Shoulda stuck to the "Make no predictions, eat no crow"
 philosophy.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.676 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:29 | 36 | 
|  |     Bob -
    
    Hit it right on the head.  Once again, and I'm sorry folks, we have
    what I'll call "Northeast snobbery" getting down on fans from other
    teams.  My long-standing fued (for want of a better term) with 'boston'
    fans is just that attitude.  The attitude that "Only we know how to be
    politically correct in rooting for out teams..."  We've seen it many
    ways in this notesfile over the years  (and in others).  
    
    Being at a Sox game in the late 70's and having fans chant "Yankees
    S*uck" or tauning Darryl Porter or Jim Eisenreich ar always forgotten.
    The Lawwy Biwd "Moses Eat Sh*T" comment is passed off (by the same
    folks who get all over Isiah for smiling...)
    
    Happens all the time.  The Hrbek sign was classless and should  never
    have been shown by CBS.  Some of the other Hrbek signs seemed to fall
    more into the 'having fun' category.  And while you may say Kent's act
    at first with Gant was just baseball the way it should be played, it
    should have been called as interference or something like that - and it
    was the cheapest shot of the series.   Red Sox fans chanted Darryl
    Strawberry's name for his doing less.  The chanted Steroids at Jose
    Canseco.  
    
    And what have Jane and Ted done?  Is it really there fault that CBS
    shows them?   Heck Ted Turner owns the team - and I'd rather see and
    Jane than Marge, George or Jean Yawkey or Gene Autry or especially Ed
    DeBartelo.
    
    The fans certainly *seem* to be having GADS of fun at the game.  And
    they certainly seem to know baseball.  
    
    I could do without the tomahawks or the constant war hoop.  But its
    there, and more than likely, it will disappear after this year is over.
    
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.677 | Lemke's the MVP | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:30 | 6 | 
|  |     What about the game?  Was that a clinic or what!?!
    
    Atlanta's bats came to life at just the right time, hopefully they're
    just as productive in Minny.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.678 |  | COBRA::DINSMORE | Say goodnight to music | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:38 | 16 | 
|  |     Good analogies  bob, all this crap comes down too is just
    
    dwelling on negative stuff, not trying to look at the good things
    
    going on in the world, people not really looking inside
    
    themselves, they are taking focus off strengthing thir own weaknesses
    
    and in the long run, jsut lowering themselves individually
    
    
    AND  as always this is just my opinion
    
    
    Jim
    
 | 
| 3.679 |  | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:40 | 6 | 
|  |     Well said Bob Hunt,
    
    Watching the Braves play has been FUN and for the first time in several
    years I've really enjoyed the baseball season, playoff and World
    Series.
    
 | 
| 3.680 |  | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:42 | 5 | 
|  |     Way to throw everyone into one classification, JD.
    
    Based on your note, you must be ecstatic to be out of Boston, huh?
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.681 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Don't quit the day job... | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:47 | 9 | 
|  |     Lee -
    
    Actually, I miss Boston.  So I'll qualify it with *some* so as not to
    offend the noters in here, who of course, cheer correctly.  ;-)
    
    For economic reasons, I sure am glad to be out of Boston, however.  Fro
    family, friends and baseball on grass, I'm not...
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.682 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:59 | 5 | 
|  |     	Congrats JD!  Once again you prove adept at taking any topic
    and twisting it around to trash Boston fans.  A truly amazing talent!
    Bravo!
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.683 | They ought sell a few thousand season tickets off that one... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:09 | 6 | 
|  | 
 Quick somebody get a frame for 678....
 Well said Sir Robert....
 mike
 | 
| 3.686 | More ... | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:23 | 33 | 
|  |  I wasn't trying to explicitly trash any team's fans, least of all the Red
 Sox.   {Remember I jumped on the Bosox bandwagon when my Phutile Phillies
 gave up the ghost early in the 1988 season.}  Each team's fans are
 incredibly different.    
 "Group" things like the chop or the hankies don't happen in Fenway.   
 And, yes, you can make the argument the Red Sox fans are mentally more
 "into" the game for just the game's sake alone than the choppers and the
 hanky wavers are.   But so what ????
 you won't find an anatomically correct inflatable doll in the Dome or in
 Fulton County Stadium either.    Just isn't done.    
 No one team's fans are *better* than another.  They're just different.  
 Boston has a trail of tears that's deeper than the ocean ... each
 successive BoSox season is a continuation of a tragi-comic passion play.  
 Atlanta has had precious little to even break a sweat over.  They had the
 1969 NL West Division, Hank Aaron's 715th dinger, Phil Neikro, and the
 1982 Dale Murphy NL West flag.    That's it.    This is their all-time
 zenith.  They're doing the chop now because they have nowhere near the
 long-term *affinity* for the game that exists in Boston.    But they also
 don't share the Boston "tragedy" complex as well.
 Only one thing is for sure.    Every single Red Sox fan and every single
 fan of every other major league baseball team would right now *LOVE* to be
 up 3 games to 2 in the 1991 World Series.    Their methods of expressing
 that joy would all be vastly different ... but the joy and anticipation
 would be there nonetheless.   Bosox fans can *NOT* rationalize away that
 envy no matter how silly the chop might be.    On that note, JD is right.
 Bob Hunt
 
 | 
| 3.687 | More "snobbery" | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:43 | 34 | 
|  |     
    Hey, relax guys.  I never said that Boston fans have never exhibited
    classlessness-- they certainly have and in many more ways than we're
    seeing now.  So what?  Why can't anyone make a simple, unqualified
    statement without hearing screams of "Northeast bias!" or "Rampant
    political correctness!" in return (hey, JD, why can't Washington
    Huskies' fans enjoy their team without you making fun of their
    clothing, etc.?).
    
    I'm very much jealous of the Braves' fans right now.  Because of
    the team.  Because of the baseball.  Not because I'd want to join
    them in slapping on a headdress or wielding a tomahawk.  Rather, 
    because my team right now would be on the verge of taking baseball's 
    biggest prize in the finest way possible-- by coming back from the
    worst record of all 26 teams in the previous year!  Think about that.  
    It's an astounding proposition, one that doesn't need any extra 
    adornment.
    
    The charge stands-- there's an awful lot of people having a good
    time now, some less than graciously, that didn't care one bit about
    the Atlanta Braves until late this season and, in my mind, are now
    pushing the limits of good taste.  ("Go Braves-- and take the Falcons 
    with you!"  Pretty much sums up the past sentiment, right?)  You guys 
    want to debate what other teams have experienced the same fan
    behavior, or what evil motivates me to reach this astounding
    conclusion, have at it.  I'm enjoying what's going on *down on the 
    field* just the same...
                                            
    And no, my assertion doesn't apply to everyone.  Matter of fact,
    over the past few years, I'd kind of almost figured that most all
    the fans of the Atlanta Braves worked for DEC...  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.688 | Buckner,Stanley,Gedman,Burton,Dent,Gibson | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:44 | 14 | 
|  |     Bob and JD,
    You guys are right about one thing. This Bosox fan is extremely
    envious. But jest cuz I think the way Atlantans and Minnysodans are 
    celebratin' seems seely don't make it "Northeast snobbery".
     Don't generalize.
    I'm sure those good people would think the way we celebrate are silly.
    Diffrent strokes, not snobbery.
    And I DO remember how it feels to be up 3-2 in the Series.
    Unfortunately I remember how dat story ended and is the reason I am
    now reachin' for the valiums. 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
    
 | 
| 3.689 | Go Braves! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:47 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.690 |  | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Curly Q. Link | Fri Oct 25 1991 14:00 | 30 | 
|  | �< Note 3.678 by COBRA::DINSMORE "Say goodnight to music" >
�    Good analogies  bob, all this crap comes down too is just
    
�    dwelling on negative stuff, not trying to look at the good things
    
�    going on in the world, people not really looking inside
    
�    themselves, they are taking focus off strengthing thir own weaknesses
    
�    and in the long run, jsut lowering themselves individually
    
    
�    AND  as always this is just my opinion
    
    
�    Jim
    
		
	Whoa, some pretty heavy stuff their Dinz.   I'm impressed, you've
come along way in our sessions.
Keep up the good work,
Dr. Mind
:-)
Chap
 | 
| 3.691 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Beam Gene up, Scotty! | Fri Oct 25 1991 14:00 | 31 | 
|  |     Glenn and Mike -
    
    I Used "Northeast Snobbery" cuz I saw it in a note by I think Tom B. -
    I didn't make it up - just used his term.  
    
    Hey, I like to have the Red Sox and/or Mets in the Series right now. 
    The Braves are a good story, and have loads of likeable guys on the
    team (NO Darryl Strawberry's, etc...) - including personal favorites
    such as Sid Bream.   The Twins are good copy too, take away the disdain
    for the Dome they play in, and they also have loads of likeable guys -
    and personal favorites like Morris, Hrbek, and Aggie.
    
    As I said, I could do without hankies, tomahawks, headresses, paws,
    whatever - but I would rather see a loud crowd then a sit on the hands
    type crowd...
    
    Glenn - I may make fun of the Huskies' fans clothing (and other stuff
    like knitted window shades for clothes), but I've never said they
    werent' good fans.  They are incredibly rabid, and are starved for a
    winner.  I think Pete Crouch understands I'm mostly yanking his chain
    when I blast the Huskies.  If they win the title - which I think they
    will, I won't begrudge the fans - nor will I take part in any
    celebrations.   I'll just brace for the opening of spring football
    practice, which will push baseball news to the classified section...
    
    And - also, I don't make fun of the fans wearing purple and gold to the
    games - that's normal.   It's wearing it at all times that's funny -
    that and the upscale stores jumping on the bandwagon with tres chic
    Husky apparal - now that's funny, IMO.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.693 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | SET HAWK/PARTY=WIFYOU | Fri Oct 25 1991 16:46 | 7 | 
|  |     Tommy -
    
    I figured folks, especiallly Glenn W., would have already say your note
    about 'Northeast Snobbery'.  You came up with it Buddy, don't pass it
    off on me.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.695 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Load Spent | Fri Oct 25 1991 17:52 | 15 | 
|  |  
>> And the "FATBOY" banner was truly classless, no doubt about it.   So why
I agree.  The classless thing about it was that the put the wrong name on it.
Should've been Kirby "Pizza" Pudgett.
>> "Group" things like the chop or the hankies don't happen in Fenway.   
Nah, I concur, Fenway's "Group" things involve an inflatable doll and 55 gallon
drum of "Veinerschlider 50"!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
 | 
| 3.696 | Braves blow Game 6; Twins enjoy Dome cookin' | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Sun Oct 27 1991 16:38 | 26 | 
|  |  Game 6 of the World Series is in the books.   An all-time classic.   This
 whole Series is perhaps the best since the epic 1975 Reds-Bosox struggle.
 
 Bobby Cox should be taken out and shot on the spot for even *thinking* of
 putting Charlie Leibrandt in to face Kirby Puckett and the meat of the
 Twins lineup.   First mistake was wasting his closer, Alejandro Pena, in a
 tied ballgame but to leave three other very good relievers (Mark Wohlers,
 Kent Mercker, and Jim Clancy) on ice and go with an ineffective Game 1
 starter was unforgivable.   Might have even been worse than Snuffy would
 have ever done.  Puckett quickly put Cox out of his misery.
 
 Braves came razor-thin close on so many occasions.  Pendleton and Justice
 hit balls that were foul by inches and several others smoked line drives
 right at the perfectly placed Twins fielders.    Brian Harper made the
 throw of his life to nail Keith Mitchell on an 11th inning steal attempt.
 
 No predictions whatsoever for Game 7.   The Braves have all they need to
 win the game and now so do the Twins.   I can't resist one jab at the
 Twins, though.   If they do win, they deserve congratulations but you just
 have to wonder if they can win a Series in an even-numbered year with only
 three games max in the Dome.    For the Twins, there truly is no place
 like Dome.
 
 Should be a great game.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.697 | Updates on game #7 tonight? | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Sun Oct 27 1991 21:29 | 10 | 
|  |                     -< Could someone keep game #7 updated? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       If anyone is out there tonight could you please keep me and maybe
    others updated throughout game #7? It would be greatly appreciated!!
       Great game #6. Best series I have seen in years! I sure wish I
    could watch game #7. Good luck to both teams and their fans.
                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.698 | 3rd inning update | LAVETA::J_PARSONS | George Stark: Not A Very Nice Guy | Sun Oct 27 1991 22:28 | 1 | 
|  |     Game 7: No score, bottom of 3rd. Braves have stranded 3, Twins 2
 | 
| 3.699 | thank you!!!! | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Sun Oct 27 1991 23:10 | 4 | 
|  |     Thanks allot for the update!!! 
                                       Night Flier   ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.700 | 6th inning update | LAVETA::J_PARSONS | George Stark: Not A Very Nice Guy | Sun Oct 27 1991 23:24 | 1 | 
|  |     Bottom of 6th: Still no score. Braves have now stranded 6 or 7.
 | 
| 3.701 | Into the 9th now... | LAVETA::J_PARSONS | George Stark: Not A Very Nice Guy | Mon Oct 28 1991 00:19 | 2 | 
|  |     Going into the 9th: Still no score! Both teams had the bases loaded in
    the 8th but couldn't score. 
 | 
| 3.702 |  | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Mon Oct 28 1991 00:42 | 4 | 
|  | 
         What a game! Wish I could see it.  Thanks for the updates!
                                                   Night Flier   ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.703 | It's over | LAVETA::J_PARSONS | George Stark: Not A Very Nice Guy | Mon Oct 28 1991 01:05 | 1 | 
|  |     Twins win 1-0 in 10. Best series game I've ever seen...
 | 
| 3.704 |  | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Mon Oct 28 1991 01:09 | 11 | 
|  | 
            Wow!!! Thanks for all of your updates! Thank goodness there are
    VCR's!  Nobody looses in this World Series. They should be considered
    co-champions!
            I guess the Twins had it all figured out....just go out and win
    all 4 at home. What a streak that is. Wonder when the next time they
    will get the chance to continue it?
                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
 | 
| 3.705 | Tigers in '92 | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Mon Oct 28 1991 08:03 | 13 | 
|  |     Wow!  It may not have been *THE* best series ever, but it sure has to
    be *ONE OF THE* best.  Best I've ever seen anyway.
    
    Goats, heros, great pitching overall, wonderful defensive plays
    (Puckett's catch will be a highlight somewhere), strategic failures and
    successes, *NO*, I repeat *NO* wacky owners taking headlines, no
    personality blowups.  
    
    Baseball as it was meant to be played. 
    
    Congrats to Twins AND Braves fans.
    
    lEe
 | 
| 3.706 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Mon Oct 28 1991 08:30 | 13 | 
|  | While I'm somewhat bummed that the Twins won (was rooting for Atlanta kinda
because they've never won before), I have to admit that it was one of
baseball's all-time greatest games....
Too bad it was tainted by being inside a plastic bag, played on artificial
turf, with such a travesty as the designated hitter.....8^(
Forget his name, but that guy who blew the baserunning for Atlanta must
feel lower than a whale's belly today......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.707 | Hit Smith over da haid with a tomahawk! | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:10 | 11 | 
|  | 
'Saw, it was Lonnie Smith, a vetran of past World Series, who made
the stooooooooooopidiest base running blunder in the history of 
the Series. I couldn't believe it. What a shame. Oh well congrats
to the Twinkies, and ecspecially to Jack Morris who proved himself 
as one of the all-time great pitchers in baseball. Gee I wonder if 
Lou Gorman coulda signed Morris?
Steve
 | 
| 3.708 | More reflections... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:12 | 52 | 
|  |     
    It was the best Series I've ever seen, including 1975.
    
    Very tough luck for the Braves in Game 6.  After that, with Jack Morris
    (who in my mind just sealed his spot in Cooperstown last night) going, 
    I didn't have a good feeling for the Braves in Game 7.  Scott
    Erickson demonstrated in Game 6 what is a truism of baseball in the 
    short run: sometimes it really is better to be lucky than good.  But 
    hey, it's not like the Braves didn't have their share of luck in the 
    games in Atlanta.  That's just the way it goes.  It couldn't have been 
    any closer...
    
    It's unfortunate that Lonnie Smith is probably going to be forever
    remembered as the guy who let the 1991 World Series slip away, because
    I think it's unjustified.  Not to excuse Smith completely, but he made
    an error of commission just like any other, not a mental error, when he 
    failed to pick up Pendleton's hit to the gap.  The absolute worst 
    mistake to make in that situation is getting thrown out on the bases 
    somewhere by running recklessly, not failing to score.  Second and third 
    and the Braves couldn't bring Smith in?  But who will remember Gant and 
    Bream's very feeble attempts to do so years from now?  Most won't, but 
    they should... 
    
    This Series demonstrated to me again why baseball is the best game in
    the world.  The anxiety and anticipation on every pitch, the tension
    during the periods of inactivity that are so often criticized for being
    "boring", are unparalleled by anything in any other game I know of. 
    It really is tough to imagine how these guys can cope with that kind of
    late game pressure and still execute at the top of their games (and,
    yes, occasionally they don't).  Stuff like Bobby Cox having the guts to
    walk the bases full and leave it up to Mike Stanton to throw strikes or 
    lose the game (I was screaming at Cox for that one!).  But Stanton came 
    through, as did Jack Morris in the top of the inning and as did
    Alejandro Pena an inning later.  Makes you shake your head in
    wonderment...
    
    On a lighter note, in between innings Saturday night did anybody
    else catch SNL's opening monologue?  The host (whose name eludes
    me) was trying to get the production crew to roll a tape of a Jack
    Nicholson sketch or something, but to no avail.  He heads up to
    the booth to see what the hell's going on, and there's the entire
    crew in a trance, watching the Braves' game, chanting and waving 
    foam tomahawks.  When he frantically returns to the stage, the 
    entire audience is doing the same.  He goes backstage and the SNL 
    staff is also transfixed and unresponsive, including special guest 
    John McLaughlin (the *real* one, not Dana Carvey's creation).  
    Finally McLaughlin tells the guy that he makes a better door than a 
    window and to get the hell out of the way of the TV.  It was priceless!
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.709 |  | CSOA1::BACH | THE Chicago Bear Fan | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:17 | 1 | 
|  |     RE: .708 Christen Slater
 | 
| 3.710 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:21 | 4 | 
|  | �Nah, I concur, Fenway's "Group" things involve an inflatable doll and 55 gallon
�drum of "Veinerschlider 50"!!!
    
    The above "Group" was about 10 out of 35K+.
 | 
| 3.711 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:31 | 5 | 
|  |     Last night was an example of the way baseball should be played, with no
    interference from some guy to old to play the game anymore.  The best
    players were out there doing what they do best.  If this game had been
    in Atlanta, you'd have seen Kelly forced to pinch hit for his best
    pitcher instead of leaving him in to finish a 10 inning masterpiece.
 | 
| 3.713 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Don't drink the Koolaid | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:45 | 13 | 
|  |     
    re: Lonnie Smith
    
    I'm not sure it was a rotten play by Smith so much as it was a
    combination of the Dome and Knoblach. From what I've heard (since I've
    never been there) it's almost impossible to pick up the ball if you
    lose track of it (esp. if you don't play there very often). Couple that
    with the terrific fake by the Twinkies 2Baseman and you get one very
    confused Lonnie Smith. That was a dandy play by the rookie to get Smith
    to slide and lose the chance at scoring.
    
    Dennis
    
 | 
| 3.714 | the DH sucks... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Ever meet a weak Ape? | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:54 | 15 | 
|  | 
 One correction Dennis, Smith never slide he just rounded second and held up
 there confused bewilder and unaware of where the ball was. While Morris was
 a decent choice, I'd have given the MVP to Knoblock. He did all the little
 things throughout the series getting clutch hits, moving runners along and
 making the plays in the field and the fake saved the bacon...
 good point Sir Robert. all that will be remebered is Smith and Gant and
 Bream deserve as much BLAM (tm). Bream was pretty bad throughout. Reminded
 me of Winfield at the plate a few years back.
 Mac BS cause if Kelly had pinchit for Morris chances are that they would 
 have won the ballgame in regulation.
 mike
 | 
| 3.715 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:10 | 17 | 
|  |     re .711
    
    No, what you woulda had last night in the absence of the Designated
    Geek would've been strategy manifesting itself in about the sixth inning
    in addition to all the drama.  
    
    ALmost "fans" never quit in their defense of the indefensible.  Today,
    it's that we woulda been robbed of Morris' "masterpiece."  Funny thing,
    though, these same ALmost people routinely decry low scoring games just
    like the one we had last night.
    
    This Series, perhaps the best in history, stands as an advertisement of
    why the Geek should be done away with.  Game 3 is probably the best 
    single baseball game ever, and it's no coincidence that it happened in
    Atlanta.
    
    MrT(wins)
 | 
| 3.716 | great series,kudos to both teams | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:22 | 7 | 
|  |     I'll go with deep-sixin the DH
    Let's take it a step further and demolish all monstrosities like
    the 'Dome. Baseball wasn't meant to be played in such plastic
    environment.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.717 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:38 | 20 | 
|  | Hawk,
If baseball wasn't such a money hungry sport, and they didn't have to
have three kazillion playoff games, the games would be played earlier
in October.  
I'm disappointed the Braves lost.  I was rooting for them for
several reasons:  a) they've never won, b) they play REAL baseball,
c) they play in a stadium with natural turf, and no plastic garbage bag
overhead...
But the Twins won, and congrats to them.
I've never seen such an evenly matched series.  For two teams to battle
to the 10th inning in the 7th game, and then have the series decided
by ONE run, is a thing of beauty.
'Saw
 | 
| 3.718 | Kids can't see late games | GEMVAX::HILL |  | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:50 | 14 | 
|  |     re playoff games
    
    "If baseball wasn't such a money hungry sport" they would play at least 
    the weekend games in the daytime. The  way CBS and NBC alternate for
    the late football double-headers, there's no reason why CBS couldn't
    have a 1 pm football game and the WS start at 4-4:30-5:00.
    
    This was, if not THE, certainly ONE OF THE best World Series in the 
    history of the game. It's too bad not too many 10 year old kids got 
    to see any of it first hand. Weeknight games make sense, but on the 
    weekend, there's no excuse. They are killing the future fan base by 
    scheduling it this way.  Is John Zeigler secretly in charge here?
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.719 |  | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:55 | 10 | 
|  | Night games on the weekend will assure MAXIMUM viewer audience.
You're not competing with college football, or pro-football as much
if it's at night.
I think that's why....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.720 | Domes Suck! | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:57 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.721 | Nostalgia ain't what it usta be | GEMVAX::HILL |  | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:31 | 32 | 
|  |     re .719   
    
    Maybe so, but it's still better in the long run to have day games. I
    don't have kids, but I was thinking of about the time I first got
    interested in baseball. If at that time the games didn't start until 
    almost 9 and ended at midnight like this series, I would have missed 
    a lot. I woulda heard the national anthem, maybe the first inning but 
    that's about it. 
    
    I remember watching the Dodgers/Orioles WS with my father when I was 8,    
    and he was explaining all the points of the game to me, and why
    Drysdale pitching to Frank Robinson was one of the greatest
    pitcher/hitter confrontations of that generation of players. I wouldn't
    have been able to do the same with my kids today, which would be a
    shame, considering that almost every game went right down to the wire
    this year.
    
    I still think baseball and CBS are making a long-range mistake. True,
    there was probably a Cheryl Ladd (or other worshed-up ex-babe) movie 
    on NBC or some other washout, but a WS shouldn't be so 'feard a having 
    something else on at the same time. This isn't like some countries where 
    there's only 2 government owned channels, and the president's speech is 
    on both of them. Besides, if someone would rather watch college football 
    or (gasp!) a non-sports program on TV, that's their perogative. That's 
    why we have cable and VCRs, etc. 
    
    It is both naive and stupid of the networks to think they can get the
    same types of rating numbers/demogtaphics that they could even 10 years
    ago. There are far too many entertainment choices available, which is a 
    good thing.
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.722 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:05 | 5 | 
|  | �Funny thing,
�    though, these same ALmost people routinely decry low scoring games just
�    like the one we had last night.
    
    Show me.
 | 
| 3.723 | DOMES SUCK & SO DOES AstroTurf YEAH !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:39 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.724 | class acts all the way around | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Mon Oct 28 1991 13:18 | 10 | 
|  |     Re: Lonnie Smith
    
    When you have men on 2nd and 3rd with *NO OUTS* and can't even hit a
    sacrifice fly, you can hardly blame 1 player.
    
    Awesome game and a great series!  As many said, Braves have much to be
    proud of.  The Twins were very gracious toward their worthy opponents
    in the post-game festivities.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.725 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 28 1991 15:14 | 5 | 
|  |     Glad to see it over.....  Now I can get some #^%*$& sleep
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s. hate to be Lonny Smith today !
 | 
| 3.726 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Good pitching beats good hitting | Mon Oct 28 1991 15:48 | 28 | 
|  | 
I was never a big anti or pro dh guy until this series....now I have to say I
am vehemently anti-dh. I think the 3 games in Atlanta showed that the NL 
managers have a much tougher job than the AL managers.
Watching last nights game I kept thinking to myself how much more exciting the
game could have been with the abscense of the DH. Do you lift Morris or SMoltz
in the 8th in a scoring situation? Who do you bring in in relief ? Do you risk
lifting Morris at all ?
Count me in as an anti-dh bigot.....
  Metz
BTW- Is Rick Aguilera vain or what? Anybody else catch him spending 5 minutes
      making sure his hair was perfect before he came in to game 6? I thought
      that was a riot?
     and isn't the runner rounding 2nd supposed to check his 3rd base coach 1st
     thing? How come none of the CBS braintrust mentioned that Smith never once
     looked at 3rd until he had seen the ball drop and was headed that way?
     CBS camera work was pretty abysmal..they continually kept missing live action
     because they were showing a replay for the 4th time.....
     Great series though......
 | 
| 3.727 | Aggie was hilarious... he knows big Game 6 pressure | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Oct 28 1991 16:26 | 24 | 
|  |              
>     and isn't the runner rounding 2nd supposed to check his 3rd base coach 1st
>     thing? How come none of the CBS braintrust mentioned that Smith never once
>     looked at 3rd until he had seen the ball drop and was headed that way?
      
    I thought they did mention it (in passing), but in any case usually
    the runner decides on his own whether to go when the ball's hit in 
    front of him where he can see it.  It's not the easiest maneuver
    in the world to be looking at the third base coach while you're
    trying to round second (slows you down), which is why the baserunner 
    normally goes with the coach's instructions only when the ball's 
    hit behind him to right field. 
    
    Perhaps you can criticize Smith for not looking for the ball soon
    enough (on a hit-and-run you're supposed to get your head up quickly),
    but I think, given that he did lose it, too much is being made of how
    Smith was tricked by the Twins' infielders and how he should have
    been using his coach, etc.  Those are possibilities, but Smith played 
    it safe and the decision to do so shouldn't have all of this negative
    "bonehaid"-type baggage attached to it.  It really shouldn't have
    mattered given the situation.  The Braves just didn't come through.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.728 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 16:47 | 2 | 
|  |     If Hrbek "cheated" by sweeping a player's leg off a base with a tag,
    what is the decoy?  A fake take in softball is cause for ejection.
 | 
| 3.729 | Just waiting for that exact situation | SHALOT::MEDVID | be still be calm be quiet now | Mon Oct 28 1991 16:58 | 8 | 
|  | >    If Hrbek "cheated" by sweeping a player's leg off a base with a tag,
>    what is the decoy?  
    
    Good coaching.  Tom Kelly might not have to think during the game being
    in the AL, but he certainly prepared his team for such situations ahead
    of time.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.730 |  | HERIAM::CORBETT | Do you think people will ever learn? | Mon Oct 28 1991 17:31 | 7 | 
|  | >   The Twins were very gracious toward their worthy opponents
>   in the post-game festivities.
 
	of course they were that's the way it's supposed to be, unless of 
course your the Pistons....   
     
 | 
| 3.731 | a proud week and a half for the anti-DG crowd | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 28 1991 22:25 | 42 | 
|  |     >Show me.
    
    Kidding, right?  But, on the off chance that you aren't: The pro-Geek
    crowd has for years used the argument that higher scoring games were
    more exciting.  This great Series rekindled the DG debate to its
    highest pitch in years.  Show ya?  Well, for one, Joe Garigiola was
    on network TV talking about how the NL was boring cuz it had too many
    low scoring games.
    
    re: Series
    
    By the numbers, the greatest Series ever.  Give credit to the umpiring
    crew for doing a great job, with only a few controversial calls (and
    most of them unique) and general satisfaction among both teams with the
    ball and strike calling.  The fans in both towns were great, with just
    the right touch of politics and good old time bad blood (the billboard,
    etc.).  There were two crowds of 100-150,000 people each after the
    game, one by the Dome, the other on the other end of downtown in the 
    warehouse district going crazy, with no violence and only a few of the
    usual DOC arrests. 
    
    The Braves have the best pitching staff in baseball.  And they're
    young.  The Twins won their 2nd Title in 5 years and are the only team
    to have done that in the past decade.  Tom Kelly has emerged as one of
    if not the top manager in the game.  Nobody finesses a flawed pitching
    staff like this guy.  He'd flourish in the NL.
    
    I thought the key to last night was Cox's decision to lift Smoltz.  We
    breathed a sigh of relief to see him go.  Not to say Cox is a bad
    skipper, cuz rating a manager one's gotta look at his success % on his
    moves.  Cox decided to go to the pen, TK was convinced by Morris to
    stay in for the tenth.  
    
    Deciding edge overall was the Twins' superior defense, although the 
    Braves D is good.  Game 6 was loaded with defensive gems by Leius,
    Gagne, Harper, and, most of all, Kirby skying up the plexiglass to save
    the day.
    
    Best Series ever, and the brie was great.  It was so good we decided to
    go for it and did up somTalbot (St. Julien) 83 !!
    
    MrT(wins WIN)
 | 
| 3.732 | Mr. "T"yuppie | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Tue Oct 29 1991 07:39 | 2 | 
|  |  Best Series ever, and the brie was great.  It was so good we decided to
    go for it and did up somTalbot (St. Julien) 83 !!
 | 
| 3.735 | Why can't they all be like that? | CST17::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis Today? | Tue Oct 29 1991 10:20 | 9 | 
|  |     Baseball ranks as one of my least favorite sports and I'd bet
    that during the last 10 years I have seen perhaps 6 total innings
    however, this series had me glued to the TV.  I LOVED it!!
    
    All I want to say is "Thank you" to both the Braves and the Twins
    for a very,very enjoyable World Series.
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.736 | mais oui! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 29 1991 10:58 | 13 | 
|  |     >we'll break open the Cabernet Sauvignon '79...
    
    Whaddya mean *we*, Kemosabe?  It'll be a rainy day in hail when
    MrT allows his palette to be defiled with that sugary swill from
    California.  As I said, I had a big hunger for Title-meat.  And that
    hunger was sated.  The Twins (best team in baseball) served it up and 
    we got to dine so fine.  Course, Title-meat is red meat, and given how
    special the occassion was, we popped open several liters a Chateau
    Talbot '83 (St. Julien).  A big, hearty, fine bordeaux wine a the
    most haut breeding.  Yummy !!
    
    MrT
           
 | 
| 3.737 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Tue Oct 29 1991 11:25 | 3 | 
|  |     I guess anyyone who thought Kelly would do a fine job in the NL after
    watching game 3 wouldn't know anything about wine, either.  Tony
    LaRussa wouldn't have let that series get back to Minny.
 | 
| 3.738 |  | CAM::WAY | MUNG, the #1 WORST Treat | Tue Oct 29 1991 11:49 | 13 | 
|  | Wine.  Hmmmph!!!
Nancies drink wine.  Real men exist for Beer/Ale/Stout and/or Whiskey.
If you wanna dance around in a field of pansies wearing a tutu, drink
some wine.
Otherwise, belly up to the bar, and order three-fingers of your favorite
whisky....straightup.
'Saw
 | 
| 3.739 | That's what *I* thought too | GEMVAX::HILL |  | Tue Oct 29 1991 11:52 | 19 | 
|  |     re .734
     
    Let's step into the Wayback Machine and set the time for this date in
    the year A.D. 1986. Change a word here and there, and see what we have:   
                                                                
    "I'm sure Bostonians are bumming over this loss but their Red Sox gave
    them quite a few thrills this year including a hell of a Series. And
    with their great, young pitching staff they've got alot to look for-
    ward to which is more than us [any other team] fans can say."
    As terrible as this was, I thought that there would be many more years
    with that generation of players, especially the pitching staff of Clemens, 
    Hurst, and a physically and emotioanlly healthy Boyd. For the Braves
    sake, let's hope they aren't as stooopid as Sox management in not
    caring enough to keep guys like Hurst and later, Boddicker, letting
    the team fall by the wayside. Then again, maybe the Braves WOULD trade 
    half their pitching staff for Greenwell and Brunansky, right Lou?
      
    Tom
 | 
| 3.740 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 29 1991 12:07 | 22 | 
|  |     Game 3 was a fine managing job by TK.  Perhaps cuz you are a ALmost
    fan and aren't aware of the subtleties involved in real baseball
    games.  TK made only one mistake in the entire move-filled game,
    and that was substituting in Al Newman.  TK admitted that this move
    was a big risk that didn't work out, but did it on instinct cuz he
    felt Newman's contact hitting would move the run across the plate.
    
    The remainder of his moves were calculatedly aggresive.  Each time
    the Twins had a shot to go ahaid he loaded up and went for it, fully
    aware that if the move didn't pay off he would be in a weakened 
    position next time around.  Sometimes this approach (which is used
    often by NL managers depending on the opponent and situation) works
    and sometimes it doesn't.  But it's never uninformed unintelligent
    dumbkopf blunders of the type seen from LaRussa and Pinella last 
    year, which embarrassed baseball fans (i.e., NL fans) the world
    over.  But, who knows?, maybe the school systems in Tampa just aren't
    any good.
    
    Cabernet Sauvignon is rotgut swill.  Chateau Talbot is nectar from
    the elysian fields hard by le Gironde.
    
    MrT(wins WIN !!)
 | 
| 3.741 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Tue Oct 29 1991 12:16 | 4 | 
|  |     	Congrats to the Twins and Mort!  Spam and Ripple for all those
    longtime fans!
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.742 |  | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Oct 29 1991 13:33 | 24 | 
|  |     
>    Game 3 was a fine managing job by TK.  Perhaps cuz you are a ALmost
>    fan and aren't aware of the subtleties involved in real baseball
>    games.  TK made only one mistake in the entire move-filled game,
>    and that was substituting in Al Newman.  TK admitted that this move
>    was a big risk that didn't work out, but did it on instinct cuz he
>    felt Newman's contact hitting would move the run across the plate.
     
    Gotta admit that the more I think about it, the more I feel that
    if anyone didn't manage the way an NL manager is "supposed to"
    it was Bobby Cox.  With runs very hard to come by all series long,
    he apparently lacked the guts to run roughshod all over that rag-arm
    Brian Harper when he was in there the last two games, on turf where 
    that kind of game is most effective.  Sure, Harper did throw out 
    Mitchell in the 11th inning of Game 6, but even then it was because 
    Mitchell got a poor jump and still was only tagged on the rear end 
    as he went sliding by.  They hit-and-ran a lot (to bad result), but 
    the hit-and-run play did not take advantage of the Twins' primary 
    weakness, at catcher.  Jack Morris isn't the best at holding runners
    on, either, which would have been his only weakness to exploit on
    that particular night...
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.743 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Nov 04 1991 18:33 | 12 | 
|  |     Know what the most thigh-suuddering aspeck a my World Series 
    Victory was?
    
    Noooo, not that my perenniel man-sized hunger for Title-meat 
    which was sated yet again (thank you).  What *I* luved was that
    after having been raked over the coals for three months by the
    Pittsburgh crowd about what a bunch a front-runners we Mpls folk
    are and then...
    
    25,000 empty game 7 seats!  HAAAA.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.744 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Mon Nov 04 1991 20:04 | 16 | 
|  |     "T"
    
    Are you related to (or maybe are you) Hal????
    
    re
    >>25,000 empty game 7 seats!  HAAAA.
    
    The figure was more like 12,000.
    
    Read the atricle by Gene Collier on the game that I entered in here
    somewhere.
    
    GAL
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.745 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Nov 05 1991 10:15 | 8 | 
|  |     Gee, FaKe, you're quite persuasive... *only* 12,000 empty game 7
    seats?!  Hmmmm, I see what you're getting at.  Only problem though,
    is that you spent the past year blabbing about some ticket mix-up
    and that proved to be so much verbal dung-style obfuscation so we'll
    just take your credibility into account and assume that the national
    writers who said 25,000 are correct.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.746 | But it appears T is wrong >again> | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R |  | Tue Nov 05 1991 11:30 | 6 | 
|  | 	Those "national" writers reporting in St.Paul/Minneapolis
	must have different sources from the "national" writers reporting
	here in Atlanta, T, because I've seen the approx.12,000 figure
	reported down here, as well.
	Of course, that's still a lot of tickets unsold ...
 | 
| 3.747 | Okay, T, what's your game this time? | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Nov 05 1991 11:39 | 14 | 
|  |     
>    	Those "national" writers reporting in St.Paul/Minneapolis
>	must have different sources from the "national" writers reporting
>	here in Atlanta, T, because I've seen the approx.12,000 figure
>	reported down here, as well.
 
    Not to mention that street mob-style estimates are unnecessary, because
    attendance figures in the NL count *actual* attendees, and the number
    released was some 47,000-odd fans.  Once again, MrT's dancing
    to the tune of a different drummer, and nobody knows what the hail
    he's talking about, which is, of course, his intent.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.748 | Sublime | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Nov 05 1991 12:55 | 16 | 
|  |     I'm dancing to the tune of a empty-seat-number I read in the local
    newspaper three times by three separate writers.  Dunno what Three
    Rivers baseball capacity is, but if the 47,000 number is truthful
    (and the veracity of the Pirates mgt. is suspect nowadays) then the,
    er, "heart void" should be easy enough to calculate.
    
    Whatever the case, MrT is not "wrong again."  What's wrong is FaKe,
    after having spent months in collusion with certain other Pittsburgh
    types a dragging poor MrT over the coals about how much better fans
    in the Steal City were than in the Twin Cities... is now in the
    position a arguing that "only" 12,000 seats were empty for the NLCS
    game 7.
    
    Now *that's* wrong!
    
    MrT 
 | 
| 3.749 |  | CAM::WAY | If it's no' Scottish it's CRAP! | Tue Nov 05 1991 13:21 | 5 | 
|  | At this late date, weeks after the incident, who really cares about 
how many empty seats there were in Pittsburgh?
Personally, I'm coming to grips with Geraldo popping a popper under
Bette's nose before grappling her massive hooters.....
 | 
| 3.750 | Game 7 NLCS | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Zrock:FlipUsOn, FlipThemOff | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:04 | 3 | 
|  |     I dunno how many empty seats were there, I do however remember a loud
    tomahawk chant going on. Did the good people off Pittsburg jump on the
    Braves' bandwagon or did the Braves' fans just out cheer them?
 | 
| 3.751 | "Read in a newspaper I have right here in my 'corporate box'" | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:08 | 10 | 
|  |     
    > I'm dancing to the tune of a empty-seat-number I read in the local
    > newspaper three times by three separate writers.
      
    Were these local "national" writers or national "local" writers?
    Gotta know where to put those all-important quotation marks when
    dealing with MrT's "interpretations"...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.752 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Nov 05 1991 15:35 | 16 | 
|  |     Local writers.  Didn't read it in Box 117.  Read it over my morning
    java.  Btw, I have my stub that sez "Suite $60" right there on it 
    in plain English.
    
    The local papers had writers at 3 Rivers to cover the NLCS in
    anticipation of the World Series.  Their accounts of the vast expanses
    of empty seats weren't of the false bravado cover-up variety seen with
    Pittsburghians during last years Stanley Cup.  They just couldn't
    believe what they were seeing.  Probably they've been spoiled by the
    super fans up here in this total sports community.  
    
    But kudos to these writers, cuz they didn't pull any of the type of
    badmouthing crap as seen in here (and the media) last spring, from
    a variety of subjective persona... including YOU Glenn.
    
    MrT(he Stadium's FULL, SOLD OUT, SRO !!)
 | 
| 3.753 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Chicago says, Vote Early & Often | Tue Nov 05 1991 18:17 | 23 | 
|  |     
    >>Local writers.  Didn't read it in Box 117.  Read it over my morning
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    >>The local papers had writers at 3 Rivers to cover the NLCS in
    >>anticipation of the World Series.  Their accounts of the vast expanses
    
    I see, it was writers for your local rags up there in Minny-soda.
    
    Only goes to show that there is prufe that ALL Minny-Sodaians suffer
    from EXTREME EXAGERATION of everything they talk or write about.
    
    Finally proved it for all of us in here.  We've thought that for ages.
    
    JaKe
    
    BTW, It bugged me that there were so many empty seats, but I cain't dew
    anything about it, so BFD.  I were 1500 miles away from here for the
    lasted couple a weeks of the season and thruout the playoffs or I
    woulda taken a night off and went to the Stadium.  Other than that,
    "T", it's over, done, behind us, so put it to rest braggadocio.
    
    
 | 
| 3.754 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Nov 06 1991 10:54 | 13 | 
|  |     >but I cain't dew anything about it, so BFD... Other than that, "T",
    >it's over.
    
    In your dreams maybe.  I was raked over the coals for months by you
    self-praising Pittsburhians (most of whom for some reason no longer 
    live there) and 12-25,000 EMPTY SEATS AT AN NLCS GAME SEVEN IS THE
    WORST EXAMPLE OF FAN SUPPORT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MAJOR SPORTS AND
    SURELY THE LOWEST CLASS EXHIBITION OF SAME IN THE HISTORY OF BASEBALL
    AND WHAT YOU CAIN "dew" ABOUT IT IS ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG LAST YEAR AND
    EAT CROW FOR THE RaKeING YOU AND YOUR BROS DID TO ME LAST SPRING !!
    
    MrT
    
 | 
| 3.755 | What the hail are you talking about? | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Nov 06 1991 11:10 | 28 | 
|  |     
>        In your dreams maybe.  I was raked over the coals for months by you
>    self-praising Pittsburhians (most of whom for some reason no longer 
>    live there) and 12-25,000 EMPTY SEATS AT AN NLCS GAME SEVEN IS THE
>    WORST EXAMPLE OF FAN SUPPORT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MAJOR SPORTS AND
>    SURELY THE LOWEST CLASS EXHIBITION OF SAME IN THE HISTORY OF BASEBALL
>    AND WHAT YOU CAIN "dew" ABOUT IT IS ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG LAST YEAR AND
>    EAT CROW FOR THE RaKeING YOU AND YOUR BROS DID TO ME LAST SPRING !!
 
    Horsepoop.  You, as both a self-proclaimed sports purist and analyst,
    were raked over the coals for your craven sell-out to the NHL's
    bogus playoff system in the face of all your past denunciations, a 
    system which allowed a pitiful regular-season performer like the 
    North Stars to advance to the championship finals.  Instead of 
    sticking to past principles, you whole-heartedly and shamelessly 
    hurtled yourself onto the bandwagon (which was the offense levied at 
    you and the Minnesota fans, NOT lack of support once the going got 
    good).  You, sir, were a frontrunner then and are an obfuscator
    now.  I suggest you come clean with an explanation before we're
    all forced to write you off as a nonsensical blowhard smitten with 
    flailing away at strawmen, armed with invented facts and figures.
    
    A once-great force of reason has managed in the short period of one
    calendar year to align himself with the ranks of the criminally
    insane!
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.756 | No inevitable decline seen here <yet> ... | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R |  | Wed Nov 06 1991 11:30 | 17 | 
|  | >    A once-great force of reason has managed in the short period of one
>    calendar year to align himself with the ranks of the criminally
>    insane!
    
     Just to defend T from the accusations that he is in a period of
     inevitable decline, I hereby challenge Glenn to name even one moment
     when T was a great force of reason.
    
     No, my friend, T has never been to such heights.  He remains at the
     same level he always has been (perhaps has risen a notch).  Nor can
     he be categorized with the criminally insane.  His shenanigans are
     those of the misunderstood and of our neighborhood college pranksters.
     While I wouldn't classify T's responses as trustworthy (whatever his
     motivations are, surely his credibility is completely shot), his sanity
     and reason have not deteriorated one bit from the level they have always
     attained.
 | 
| 3.758 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Nov 06 1991 16:56 | 39 | 
|  |     What's going on here?
    
    Waugamain, after wading through your diatribe I could only wince
    at the dangerous irony of your having used the word "blowhard" at
    all.  No, no hypocrisy or sell-outs attended my fine boosterism of
    the North Stars and Twins.  I'm lucky enough as a human bean to be
    here in the City of Championships and able to observe these ultimate
    proceedings from center ice seats and first base luxury suits.
    
    I think you're jealous buddy.  I threw down the gauntlet and 
    challenged you to prove a link between my theoretical purity as per
    the Designated Geek, Turf, Domes, and nonselective playoffs and you
    skulked away, not only mute, but probably moot to boot.
    
    Nay, I'm clean.  I aim still the Beacon of Reason in here, and my
    light burns bright with the passion of Right.  
    
    Also, you evade the Truth in a most bogus manner when you claim that
    the mugging I took in the hockey notes had only to do with my alleged
    hypocrisy and didn't involve massive dosages of Minnesota fan-bashing,
    which of course it did.
    
    Let's settle without compromising ourselves.  The fig leaf I extend is
    taht you Pittsburghians (who for some reason almost all now reside
    elsewhere) humiliated yourselfs in this file and in the national media
    with all that self-praising chest-strutting and belittling of the fine
    fans in a total sports town that the Twin Cities are and then only 
    months later were horrified to see the lie put to that Nixonesque
    ticket mix-up excuse and worse 12-25,000 empty NLCS game7 seats and all
    that that meant. 
    
    You guys were mean, and you got burned.  Pittsburgh is an embarrassment
    to all of sport and to baseball in particular.  Baseball should move
    out of the Steal City now cuz the fans don't measure up to fans such as
    those found in the Twin Cities.  
    
    And Pittsburgh was an embarrassment to you, too.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.759 | I bow once again to the master ... | SHALOT::HUNT | I Survived Megastorm '91 | Wed Nov 06 1991 17:02 | 8 | 
|  |  Nobody keeps a rathole more alive more often than MrT ...
 
 Now he has the Pittsburgh crew actually defending their 12,000 empty
 NLCS Game 7 seats.  
 
 Sheer brilliance.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.760 | Sublime | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Nov 06 1991 17:15 | 14 | 
|  |     Why, thank you Bob.
    
    The highest-frequency thigh-shuddering paroxyms are actually being
    caused not by their hilarious defense of a half-empty NLCS game7,
    but rather by the fack that the Pittsburgh crowd contains gentlemen
    who once stood at the pinnacle of scientific-objectivism in sports
    noting: Waugamain, Medvid, Partee, et al (disincluding FaKe, to be
    sure).  
    
    Now, they're twisting facts and shouting tirades in their udderly
    fantastic embarrassment with not only with Pittsburgh but with 
    themselves.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.761 | Awaiting explanation for former distaste for local teams | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Nov 06 1991 17:29 | 43 | 
|  |                               
>    I think you're jealous buddy.  I threw down the gauntlet and 
>    challenged you to prove a link between my theoretical purity as per
>    the Designated Geek, Turf, Domes, and nonselective playoffs and you
>    skulked away, not only mute, but probably moot to boot.
 
    Gee, T, you forgot about the relentless abuse you've heaped on the 
    "Twinks" and "No Stars" (*your* nicknames, not mine) for years.  You 
    forgot about your advocacy of a move of the Twins' franchise to Denver 
    and an outright dissolution of the North Stars' organization.  
    Combined with all the other distasteful elements listed above that 
    you've also complained about over the years but suddenly found the 
    strength to stomach come championship time, yes, I'd say your "purity" 
    is severely tainted!  And who skulked away with a response of "I 
    haven't been accused of anything" when I addressed these 
    inconsistencies the first time around?
       
    Does the following look like a defense of the non-sellout?  I've
    been the first to admit that baseball rates a distant third in
    Pittsburgh behind football and hockey.  No MrT-like hypocrisy from
    me...
    
    glenn
    
>    Lastly, there's no excuse for how far short Game 7 was from a sellout.
>    History doesn't mean a thing if there aren't many natives left who 
>    truly appreciate it.  Pittburghers sensing the "choke" doesn't cut it
>    as an answer, either (how many of those folks would have been right 
>    back on the bandwagon for the World Series?).  I had three members of 
>    my immediate family, still die-hard Pirates fans all (I gave up such 
>    rigid allegiance to my team of birthright long ago), at this series-- 
>    who came in from Cincinnati, DC, and San Francisco to do so (these
>    people aren't rich either, but they do understand that the opportunity
>    to see the Pirates in the postseason, much less a Game 7, is a rare
>    one).  It is a shame that a Game 7 to the most exciting series in years
>    wasn't able to attract even 50,000 fans, even if just as fans of great 
>    baseball.  If the Pirates ever do move from Pittsburgh, which really 
>    would be a great tragedy, the fans who couldn't even make it out to a 
>    Game 7 at the home park of the team with the best record in baseball 
>    would only have themselves to blame.  You can't keep pointing fingers at
>    management, not when the product has been as good as the Pirates the
>    past few years...
    
 | 
| 3.762 | Been there | SHALOT::HUNT | I Survived Megastorm '91 | Wed Nov 06 1991 17:31 | 26 | 
|  |  Actually, I've been in that position before under slightly different
 circumstances ... namely, the Sixers poor attendance numbers when they go
 up against their next door neighbors, the Phillies.
 
 True story ... back in the early 1980's when the Sixers were in the NBA
 power troika with the Lakers and the Celtics, they actually drew something
 like 5,000 fans to a Sunday afternoon Game 7 finale against the Bucks.  
 Meanwhile, across the street, the Phils played the Cubs in front of
 40,000.   
 
 When you boil down *ALL* the reasons, excuses, rhetoric, and issues, you
 really only come up with two possible explanations ... either the Bucs'
 fans didn't care or the ticket prices were too high.
 
 It is a knock, however hard it hurts, on the Pittsburgh Pirates fans if
 they didn't care enough to attend Game 7.   For some strange reason that I
 can't figure out, the Pirates just don't seem to inspire a truly rabid fan
 following.   It gets even stranger when you think of the success they've
 had over the past 20 or so years (especially the early 1970's) and some of
 the supreme talents they've had to root for ... Clemente, Stargell,
 Parker, Bonds, ...
 
 Philly is a baseball, hockey and college basketball town.  Pittsburgh is a
 football town.   Been that way for a long time, too.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.763 |  | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Wed Nov 06 1991 18:12 | 11 | 
|  |     Pittsburgh fans, why even bother acknowledging this lone clanging
    cymbal of hypocrisy?  The Pirates have a better legacy than most of the
    league.  The excuse of "starvation for title meat" doesn't justify the 
    hypocrisy behind supporting a plastic team.
    
    The bait-switch-play_by_my_rules routine is the norm for people
    that lack honesty and subject knowledge.  I thought all SPORTSters that 
    embraced their fantasy-like view of the world as reality had already
    left DEC.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.764 |  | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Wed Nov 06 1991 18:26 | 32 | 
|  | >    caused not by their hilarious defense of a half-empty NLCS game7,
>    but rather by the fack that the Pittsburgh crowd contains gentlemen
>    who once stood at the pinnacle of scientific-objectivism in sports
>    noting: Waugamain, Medvid, Partee, et al (disincluding FaKe, to be
    Not me, main.  I dint never say nothing about the game 7 attendance.
    In the paradigm of fandom, it was indefensible and I haven't defended it.
  
>    Let's settle without compromising ourselves.  The fig leaf I extend is
>    taht you Pittsburghians (who for some reason almost all now reside
>    elsewhere) humiliated yourselfs in this file and in the national media
    T, a main who possesses the fine grasp of dastistics that you daily 
    display surely sees that you are conversing with a non-representative 
    sample (Pittsburghers at DEC) of the true Pittsburgh denizens.  A
    fine upright manly sample we are, to be sure, but we are not a random
    sample.  Except for JaKe, those who stayed in the 'burgh ain't in the 
    notesfiles.  And they ain't talking to you.  I know plenty of people 
    who would only accept jobs in the Steel City.  This implied slur isn't 
    worthy of your high standards, T (snicker).
>    the North Stars and Twins.  I'm lucky enough as a human bean to be
>    here in the City of Championships and able to observe these ultimate
   No way, no how, T(hief).  You can't usurp this title from the rightful
   owners.  The Twins spam-balled (TM) their way into two championships...and
   that's it.  No Lombardi trophies, no Stanley Cups (heh heh...).  The
   City of Bridesmaids kin be proud of their respectable teams, but they
   cain't be proud of their CHAMPEENSHIP teamS!
    
    Charlie
    
 | 
| 3.765 | Thanks T ! | LUNER::BROOKS | X-Men rooooole ! | Wed Nov 06 1991 22:13 | 9 | 
|  |     re .758
    
    > I'm lucky enough as a human bean .....
                       
    Well T, you have at last described yourself somewhat accurately.
    
    You ARE full of it (gas and other byproducts) !!!!
    
    Dr Midnight
 | 
| 3.766 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Thu Nov 07 1991 00:14 | 18 | 
|  |     re.765
    
    For once Midracingstripeintheshorts, you've said something worthwhile.
    
    Re somewhere back there, I have never DEFENDED 12,000 empty seats. 
    back in my notes I said I don't understand it, I entered Gen Collier's
    column on the empty seats, but I never downright defended the empty
    seats, cause I would have given up my hard earned cahs money to be in
    one of them if'n I had been in town at the time.
    
    Other than that, I rest on the subject.  I refuse to go on with "T" and
    have to read his diatribes on why Pittsburgh this and Pittsburgh that
    when the guy ain't never probably been here more than a flight change
    in the airport.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.767 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Nov 07 1991 09:27 | 38 | 
|  |     Waugamain, you disappoint even in your (weak-tit) obfuscati here.
    
    Yeah, after chest-strutting and Twin Cities-bashing last spring you
    guys logged in to do some circumspect spin control on those tens of
    thousands of empty NLCS game7 seats (certainly the most vividly
    shocking example of poor fandom in the history of sport and the
    greatest embarrassment to MLB)... but what you DIDN'T do is:
    
    - Apologize and admit that you were wrong in your claims that
      Pittsburghians were superfans and Minnesotans were brie-eating
      front-runners (note: yes, we eat brie, in fact I had some only
      last night at my dinner table, but we're not front-runners).
    
    - Give up on the canard that my past criticisms of the NoStars
      and Twinkies (affectionate monikers, btw) in connection with my
      fine boosterism somehow constitutes hypocrisy.  How so?  I called
      for the Twins to move to Denver so baseball could be played under
      the sun in the wind on natural grass.  Steal feel that way.  No
      contradiction with my boosterism there!  Ditto for the NoStars, but
      in a even clearer way.  My comments per the NoStars related to the
      infamous Gund brothers, whose high jinks caused thousands of hard
      core hockey fans to stay home in protest.  When Green bought the
      squad the enthusiasm slowly built back up.  No contradiction there
      neither!
    
      As for the non-selectivity, so what.  They were in the Cup Finals,
      and that was what I was dealing with.  Never said that non-selectivity
      was good.  Ftm, never endorsed Turf or Domes, neither.
    
    Here's the crux: You guys endorsed Pittsburgh fans (feigns?) by way of
    bashing Minnesota fans.  Then, tens of thousands of empty seats for a
    NLCS game7.  The worst example of fan support in the history of sport,
    period, and none of you have had the intellectual courage to come to 
    grips with this horrific FACT.
    
    Thank you,
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.768 | Prove it or lose it... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Nov 07 1991 10:16 | 51 | 
|  | 
    > empty NLCS game7 seats (certainly the most vividly
    > shocking example of poor fandom in the history of sport and the
    > greatest embarrassment to MLB)...
    
    Prove it.  I've offered no apologies for the empty seats, but it
    should be noted that Pittsburgh sold out the other three playoff
    games (admittedly minus a couple thousand of the worst seats in
    one of the worst baseball stadiums in the country) and, perhaps
    in their overconfidence, had completely sold out their tickets to 
    all of the World Series games.
        
    Let me give you a hint: there have been smaller crowds, with more
    empty seats, in playoff and World Series play, much less in the
    "history of sport".  You're all wet here.  You have a point, but
    once again it's lost in the hyperbole.
    
>        - Apologize and admit that you were wrong in your claims that
>      Pittsburghians were superfans and Minnesotans were brie-eating
>      front-runners (note: yes, we eat brie, in fact I had some only
>      last night at my dinner table, but we're not front-runners).
 
    No apology necessary.  I never claimed Pittsburghers to be "superfans",
    and the lackluster attendance of Minnesota baseball fans even during 
    periods of relative success speaks for itself.  I'll cut you a break
    on the hockey thing, as the crooked Gund brothers certainly had
    a major affect there.  To be honest, the bashing I did of North Stars' 
    fans was completely in fun, as I don't give a rat's butt about them
    or the Penguins.  But you have managed to take that good-natured
    jousting and go off the deep end with it, babbling incoherently
    all the way down on your descent...
    
>        - Give up on the canard that my past criticisms of the NoStars
>      and Twinkies (affectionate monikers, btw) in connection with my
>      fine boosterism somehow constitutes hypocrisy.  How so?  I called
>      for the Twins to move to Denver so baseball could be played under
>      the sun in the wind on natural grass.  Steal feel that way.  No
 
    Right.  A Minnesota resident and a supposed title-meat-hungry Twins' 
    fan feels that it would be better if the Twins moved away to Denver 
    (no more Series' games in the "corporate box"! Sniff...)  Now that's
    a *real* fan!  Gee, why not to Florida, MrT?     
    
>    The worst example of fan support in the history of sport,
>    period, and none of you have had the intellectual courage to come to 
>    grips with this horrific FACT.
                 
    Again, prove it, 'cause you know damn well I can disprove it.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.769 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Keep Religion Out of Politics!! | Thu Nov 07 1991 10:56 | 17 | 
|  |     re .63
    
    Second paragraph - so can one infer that means folks like JoJ, Dan,
    Mike JN, Hoot, Monty West, etc???
    
    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.
    
    As for the Pirates legacy - it is no secret that Pittsburg is a
    football town.  Personally, I found it pretty crappy that Game 7 wasn't
    sold out.  It was as if the faux fans simply jumped off the bandwagon
    and scrambled back to watch the Pens after the loss in Game 6.  
    
    As for baiting - yep MrT does it pretty well - but so do lots of folks
    - myself and you included also.  
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.770 |  | CAM::WAY | If it's no' Scottish it's CRAP! | Thu Nov 07 1991 10:59 | 9 | 
|  | >    
>    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
>    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.
Ok, JD, trash my feelings 8^(, see if *I* care (sniff, sniff)....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.771 |  | HAVASU::HEISER | unborn women have rights too | Thu Nov 07 1991 11:42 | 13 | 
|  |     I guess Glen wins that debate.  T cain't prove or document anything. 
    Afterall, he's too busy!
    
    While we're proving things...
    
>    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
>    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.
    
    I don't think so JD.  There are a lot of people in here, including you
    and I, that stick to our beliefs and support our teams no matter what.
    Don't sell yourself short...
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.772 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Keep Religion Out of Politics!! | Thu Nov 07 1991 11:46 | 8 | 
|  |     Mike -
    
    I'm not selling myself short - but, at times, I think we are all a
    little guilty of hypocrisy - partly because in supporting
    teams/players, etc that we like, we may hypocritically trash another
    team/player.  Not saying we are guilty all the time!
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.773 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TheNewM&MDuo-Messier%Madonna | Thu Nov 07 1991 12:03 | 4 | 
|  |     	Maybe the math types out there can figure out a hypocrisy quotient
    that we can apply and determine who the biggest hippycrit is.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.774 |  | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 07 1991 12:13 | 13 | 
|  | �we're not front-runners).
    
    So explain why the NorthStars didn't start getting reasonable
    attendance until the playoffs (sorry, but I'm not buying that poor
    attendance was protesting management - it was protesting the team not
    winning).  How was the Twins' regular season attendance?  Was it better
    than Pittsburgh's?
    
    �NoStars and Twinkies (affectionate monikers, btw) 
    
    Spin control at its finest.
    
    
 | 
| 3.775 |  | CAM::WAY | If it's no' Scottish it's CRAP! | Thu Nov 07 1991 13:44 | 5 | 
|  | >
>    	Maybe the math types out there can figure out a hypocrisy quotient
>    that we can apply and determine who the biggest hippycrit is.
    
The SPORTS Hypocritical Affect.  A stat for Dan if there ever was one...8^)
 | 
| 3.776 | And the same was true at the Met... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Nov 07 1991 15:03 | 18 | 
|  |     
   > How was the Twins' regular season attendance?  Was it better
   > than Pittsburgh's?
    
    The Twins' was better by a couple hundred thousand out of some 2.2+ 
    million.  'Course, last year the Twins were 20th in a 26-horse race 
    (probably even worse if not for the AL method of counting), but T's 
    already poor-mouthed that away with his last-place team excuse, even 
    though he knows darn well that the team wasn't that bad (divisional 
    imbalance) and still represented a quality product in a clean,
    family-oriented environment.
    
    Fact is, the history of support for baseball in both these cities
    is spotty at best...
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.777 | Waugamain, SPORTS' debutant Hypocrite | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Thu Nov 07 1991 15:11 | 41 | 
|  |     Ah, the sublimity a it all....  Yeah, Waugamain, you got me there,
    indeed the Pittsburghians deed manage to sell out the first 3 games
    of the NLCS.
    
    JD, you resemble a ally like Tom Foley resembles a opposition leader:
    Like a boat anchor!  Let me summarize it myself:
    
    1)  I hate the Dome and the Geek.
    
    2)  I'd like to see the Twins moved to Denver, cuz then they'd be
        playing under the sun on the grass.
    
    3)  I rooted for the Twins in the World Series.  Admittedly, this was
        made easier by the fact that they're the most soulful, gutsy, well-
        coached squad in the game.
    
    1-3 yields 0.0 micrograms of the dreaded toxic Hy-2 compound, known to
    cause disorientation, nausea, and hallucinations in humans.  
    
    and...
    
    1)  I hate nonselective playoff formats.
    
    2)  Like others I hated the Gund brothers for blackmailing taxpayers for
        a hundred million dollars and getting rid of their best players to
        drive down fan support and attendance so as to force Ziegler to
        allow them to move the North Stars.
    
    3)  I rooted for the North Stars in the Stanley Cup.   Admittedly, this
        was made easier by the fact that they play on the best ice in the
        NHL.
    
    1-3 yields 0.0% micrograms of the dreaded toxic Hy-2 compound, known to
    cause disorientation, nausea, and hallucinations in humans.
    
    Additionally, the Twins finished in last place last year and their
    attendance was as I remember over a 1 1/2 million.  If you wanna bash
    front-runner feigns I refer you to Atlanta, where a bad year'll get ya
    900K in a season.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.778 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Thu Nov 07 1991 16:40 | 9 | 
|  |     
    
    My favorite part of the Pittsburg article is where the writer divides
    the number of empty seats at game 7 by the total number of seats
    available during the entire year.  I couldn't figure out what the hell
    that was supposed to prove, as it means absolutely nothing, or why he
    would even think it up.
    
    Bruce              
 | 
| 3.779 | "Analyst" fails to deliver... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Nov 07 1991 17:12 | 17 | 
|  |     
>    Ah, the sublimity a it all....  Yeah, Waugamain, you got me there,
>    indeed the Pittsburghians deed manage to sell out the first 3 games
>    of the NLCS.
                                                               
    Well, add a charge of Willful Misrepresentation to the existing charges
    of Hypocrisy and Obfuscation (and to think for all those years *you*
    chastised Dan for such behavior!).  The comment I made came not as a
    defense of the Game 7 non-sellout, which was inexcusable, but in direct
    response to your "worst MLB embarrassment ever" line a bull, which, as
    Mr. Heiser predicted, you'd drop when confronted with a demand for
    supporting evidence.  Mysteriously, the demand was completely ignored
    in favor of more intellectually dishonest, inflammatory material such
    as the above.  Failure to accede to request duly noted... 
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.780 |  | CELTIK::JACOB |  | Thu Nov 07 1991 20:52 | 14 | 
|  |     
    >>My favorite part of the Pittsburg article is where the writer divides
    >>the number of empty seats at game 7 by the total number of seats
    >>available during the entire year.  I couldn't figure out what the hell
    >>that was supposed to prove, as it means absolutely nothing, or why he
    >>would even think it up.
    
    Bruce, it wasn't the seats available for the whole year, it was the
    seats available for the 4 playoff games and 3 world series games.
    total ~420,000 of which all but 12,000-15,000 were sold.  And most of
    those were for the game 7 abomination.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.781 | Ban DG, Turf, Domes; Move Twins to Denver YEAH | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 09:22 | 15 | 
|  |     YOU are the one chest-strutting about allegedly having facks even
    more mortifying than Pittsburgh's squalid embarrassment in your
    possession, Waugamain.  Thus YOU are the one who is backing down 
    from the challenge.  I don't blame ya, after defending tens a thousands 
    a empty NLCS game7 seats, you've already hoed a tough row, and laying
    down the tool is certainly understandable at this point.
    
    re: FaKe
    
    Hmmmm, so now it's up to 15,000 empty seats according to those frauds
    in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization.  So long as you're coming
    clean, RaKe, any admissions outta them on how their ticket x-up cover
    story was faked?
    
    MrT(wins WIN yeah !!)
 | 
| 3.782 | Better crank up the excuse machine, MrT... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Nov 08 1991 10:41 | 63 | 
|  |     
>    YOU are the one chest-strutting about allegedly having facks even
>    more mortifying than Pittsburgh's squalid embarrassment in your
>    possession, Waugamain.  Thus YOU are the one who is backing down 
>    from the challenge.  I don't blame ya, after defending tens a thousands 
>    a empty NLCS game7 seats, you've already hoed a tough row, and laying
>    down the tool is certainly understandable at this point.
     
    *You* made the assertion that Pittsburgh's Game 7 no-show was the 
    greatest embarrassment in the history of sports, and I asked that you
    back it up.  I also warned you that if you didn't accept my challenge
    to play tough, clean hardball, that *I* would and the result would
    come at your expense.  Well, you asked for it, pal:
    
    	Ten smallest crowds in post-League Championship history:
        1.  Oakland, Game 5, 1973 ALCS		24,265
        2.  MINNESOTA, Game 1, 1970 ALCS	26,847
        3.  MINNESOTA, Game 2, 1970 ALCS	27,490
        4.  Oakland, Game 4, 1973 ALCS		27,497
        5.  Baltimore, Game 3, 1970 ALCS	27,608
        6.  Baltimore, Game 4, 1974 ALCS	28,136
        7.  Oakland, Game 1, 1972 ALCS		29,536
        8.  Oakland, Game 2, 1972 ALCS		31,088
        9.  Baltimore, Game 3, 1974 ALCS	32,060
       10.  MINNESOTA, Game 3, 1969 ALCS	32,735
    
    Minnesota, two of the three (and three of the ten) smallest crowds
    in divisional postseason history!  Pittsburgh, despite playing over
    twice as many playoff games as Minnesota and in *five* series in
    the years 1970-75 (where attendance was down across the board),
    nowhere to be found on the list!
    
    Now we know where those Minnesota writers got their 25,000 empty-
    seat figure.  The poor creatures were having delusional flashbacks,
    no doubt based in a deep-seated Twin Cities inferiority complex,
    to the sordid days of Minnesota Twins playoff games played before
    half-empty Metropolitan Stadium crowds!
    
    Looking for MLB "embarrassments" from more recent history?  How
    about 36,491 (20,000+ empty) in Montreal, for the classic 1981 NLCS 
    Game 5 finale with Los Angeles?  How about 32,084 (12,000 empty)
    in Toronto, 1985 ALCS Game 7?  
    
    And, lastly, in what is maybe the biggest blemish in MLB postseason
    history, how about the measly 44,672 (12,000 empty) in New York for the
    Mets' playoff opener, 1988 Game 3 against Los Angeles?  Geez, you'd
    think a big city like New York would be able to sell out a playoff game
    before you'd pick on little ol' Pittsburgh, wouldn't you?  Or maybe it
    was just the ticket distribution policy that caused New York to leave
    such a stain on our great game?  Got a coverup story for us yet, T? 
    
    But, hey, MrT, I'm not one to hold a grudge.  Whatta ya say I extend
    you one of them "fig leafs" and we hear no more about Minnesota's
    tawdry bottom 10 all-time attendance rankings or the consternation 
    New York Met fans caused all a baseball in 1988?  How 'bout we make
    just a slight amendment to your original claim on Pittsburgh, leave 
    those *true* Minnesota Twins fans alone, make *you* the greatest 
    embarrassment in the history of ::SPORTS, and leave it at that!?  
    Deal?
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.783 | ;-) | HAVASU::HEISER | the sky is cryin | Fri Nov 08 1991 12:55 | 1 | 
|  |     Hey Glen!  That's no fair using facts on a paraphraser!
 | 
| 3.784 | They need to DG.. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Keep Religion Out of Politics!! | Fri Nov 08 1991 13:10 | 3 | 
|  |     Interesting that most of those numbers are for AL teams.  
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.785 | nice try but you fell down | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 13:47 | 35 | 
|  |     First, I question the accuracy a your information.  The antediluvean
    numbers may or may not be real, but no way in HELL was Shea half-empty
    for the 88 NLCS.  I lived in the New York area at the time, and people
    we're willing to kill for a ticket, any ticket.
    
    As for me being wrong, so sorry Waugamain, but I think everybody finds
    the Pittsburgh squalor the MOST embarrassing for three reasons:
    
    1) It was the 2nd year in a row for the sad-sack Pittsburgh feigns.
    
    2) It was a game7 in a classic LCS, one a the best ever.
    
    3) The feigns who failed to show up (for the 2nd year in a row) had
       spent the previous spring puffing their concave chests about how
       much better they were than fans from a certain other town.
    
    You know how much I hate to let you down, Waugamain, given how heavy
    your breathing was thinking that you had *finally* nailed poor MrT.
    
    But embarrssment is a emotion, and it's a relative thing.  You cain't
    simply apply dry dastisticks (tm) to quantify something as nebulous 
    as embarassment (or even mortification).
    
    I think I've made a persuasive case that you Pittsburgh people managed
    to embarrass yourselves and baseball and all a sport more so than any
    ever before.
    
    You people have pioneered the lowest moment in the history a sport.
    
    Sorry, old friend.  I confer upon you a "E" for effort but you fell
    short (as with the missing linkage [pun fully intended 8^] on my 
    alleged hypocrisy)...
    
    MrT(wins YEAH !!)
                         
 | 
| 3.786 |  | CAM::WAY | If it's no' Scottish it's CRAP! | Fri Nov 08 1991 13:52 | 7 | 
|  | 
The knackerman came and took the dead horse you guys are trying to beat
a week ago......
8^)
 | 
| 3.787 | You've been burnt, T.  Burnt bad (really kinda sad. Sniff) | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Nov 08 1991 14:14 | 41 | 
|  |     
>    First, I question the accuracy a your information.  The antediluvean
>    numbers may or may not be real, but no way in HELL was Shea half-empty
>    for the 88 NLCS.  I lived in the New York area at the time, and people
>    we're willing to kill for a ticket, any ticket.
     
    Well, maybe if those New Yorkers had spent a little less effort killing
    for a ticket and just walked up to the box office, the 12,000 empty
    seat embarrassment could have been prevented.  (The number I gave
    is o-fish-ul and accurate!)
                 
>   1) It was the 2nd year in a row for the sad-sack Pittsburgh feigns.
    
    Similar instances clearly documented, most conspicuously Minnesota
    1969-70. 
    
>   2) It was a game7 in a classic LCS, one a the best ever.
                                                                    
    Similar instances clearly documented, including ultimate games of 1973 
    ALCS, 1981 NLCS, and 1985 ALCS (historically Games 6 and 7 are more 
    poorly attended than earlier, guaranteed games-- fact).
          
>   3) The feigns who failed to show up (for the 2nd year in a row) had
>      spent the previous spring puffing their concave chests about how
>      much better they were than fans from a certain other town.
       
    Yeah, right.  And there weren't any slings directed in the other
    direction from at least one resident of America's hockey hotbed?
    
>   But embarrssment is a emotion, and it's a relative thing.  You cain't
>   simply apply dry dastisticks (tm) to quantify something as nebulous 
>   as embarassment (or even mortification).
                                                                     
>   I think I've made a persuasive case that you Pittsburgh people managed
>   to embarrass yourselves and baseball and all a sport more so than any
>   ever before.
    Haw haw haw haw haw!
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.788 | Fini | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 14:59 | 4 | 
|  |     Glenn, I'll take that hallow guffaw to be your admission a defeat on
    this.  No hard feeling, bud.
    
    MrT(riumpuhant)
 | 
| 3.789 | No hard feelings, bud. ;-) | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Nov 08 1991 15:19 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.790 | spring-to-fall ---> Pittsburghians' Nightmare | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 15:51 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.791 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | ALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGot | Fri Nov 08 1991 15:55 | 16 | 
|  |     
    >>Hmmmm, so now it's up to 15,000 empty seats according to those frauds
    >>in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization.  So long as you're coming
    >>clean, RaKe, any admissions outta them on how their ticket x-up cover
    >>story was faked?
    
    Re the seat count, there were 12,000 empty on the night of game 7, and
    3,000 noshows the night of game 6 in the 42 degree weather.
    
    Re your lame assertion of a "cover-up", talk to Steve Greenberg of the
    Pirates, he's the one who took the blame for lasted year.
    
    Please send away for a mail order life "T",
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.792 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 16:04 | 5 | 
|  |     Does this mean you're finished bragging about Pittsburgh fans, FaKe?
    
    I would certainly hope so, for *everybody's* sake, RaKe !!
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.793 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | ALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGot | Fri Nov 08 1991 16:11 | 6 | 
|  |     Does this mean your done ragging on Pittsburgh fans, cons"T"ipa"T"ed??
    
    I would certainly hope so, for everybody's sake, cons"T"ipa"T"ed !!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.794 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Keep Religion Out of Politics!! | Fri Nov 08 1991 17:09 | 9 | 
|  |     Acrtually - all MrT has done is give some of you guys a kind of 'in yo
    face' move with this 'discussion'.  Last year, the NoStar 'fans' were
    railed on unmercifully in here as bandwagon jumpers, not real fans,
    etc.  (Probably true...)  And it was also noted how great the
    pittsburgh fans were.  Now, you have a lot of empty seats for the most
    important game of the Pirates season, and T is giving a little reverse
    screw.  
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.795 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 17:37 | 9 | 
| 3.796 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | ALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGot | Fri Nov 08 1991 20:44 | 38 | 
|  |     re.794
    
    As I've stated in past replies, it erked me to no end to see all of
    those seats open in the lasted game of the NLCS.  I don't have any idea
    as to why the people stayed away that night, so I ain't gonna try and
    analyze it.  But for "T" to say the fans are horrible for bailing out
    on that game is utter BS.. The Bucs set team attendance figures for the
    season, averaging over 25k per game, and set 3 Rivers attendance
    records in games 1 & 2 of the NLCS.  Game 6 had 54,000 in attendance
    even though it was 42 degrees at game time.  All seats for game 6 were
    gonzo.  For some reason, game 7 didn't sell.  Possibly because the
    locals thought they'd take it in 6, but I don't know.  As GW stated, it
    is not the first time that NLCS games had less than outstanding
    attendance.  Seeing some of the numbers he posted on attendance for LCS
    games, "T" is just ragging on Pgh as much as he can before midnight
    comes around and his chariot turns back into a pumpkin(not one of
    Hawk's I hope).
    
    I got on him lasted year(earlier this year) for the NoStars fans. 
    Lessee, they turned out at a rate of what, 2000 or 3000 per game. 
    Hell, the NoStars owner couldn't pay people to go to games.  In the
    meantime, the Penguins were averaging over 16k/game.  Not bad in a
    house that holds 16,900.  So, the NoStars back into the playoffs with a
    record that sipped very indiscreetly, and Biff calls Muffy to see if
    she wants to get in the Beamer, take some Brie and sushi and crappy
    tasting wine, and go to the playoffs cause it's fashionable and
    yuppy-ish in Minny-Sordid.  Personally, if you ask me, I'll tell you
    which fans were being true to their team and which ones were all of the
    sudden showing up 'cause it was "the thing to do".
    
    I said it before and I'll say it again, and this time I will stick to
    it,  this is over, done with, and useless to beat anymore(alThough we
    know someone wonT leT iT die{hinTs given), and I'm not arguing iT
    anymore.  WhaTs iT going To prove??????  One person spouting "Nyah Nyah
    Nyah Nyah Nyah"'s at the other.  Drop it, leave it to rest.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.797 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Fri Nov 08 1991 23:12 | 18 | 
|  |     >it erked me to no end...
    
    Wail, if it "erked" you to no end I'm satisifed, FaKe.  Now, I know
    that this will no doubt elicit yet another comment about my Ring of
    Fire (but whatever turns you on), but when you brag on about how the 
    Pirates managed to set team attendance [sic] figures for the season,
    averaging a paltry 25K per game, and managed to set 3 rivers attendance
    records in a playoff game, and put 50K in seats despite what you claim
    were 42 degree temperatures (so what), well, again, I cain only extend
    you heartfelt congrat's on your so very fine defense of those tens of
    thousands of empty seats in game7 a a classic NLCS.
    
    Cut it however you like, but suffice it to say that henceforth you'll
    keep your mouth shut about Pittsburgh feigns, cuz they're nobodies.
    
    And that's a FACK.
    
    MrT(wins WIN yeah O YEAH !!)
 | 
| 3.798 | Dragged back in for yet one more reply | CELTIK::JACOB | ALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGot | Sat Nov 09 1991 00:12 | 19 | 
|  |     
    >>averaging a paltry 25K per game, and managed to set 3 rivers attendance
    
    And just how many did the Twinkies average?????  25,001/game
    
    >>you heartfelt congrat's on your so very fine defense of those tens of
    >>thousands of empty seats in game7 a a classic NLCS.
    
    Not defending empty seats in game 7 Oh "T"(wister of words), just the
    fans of Pgh.
    
    >>    that this will no doubt elicit yet another comment about my Ring of
    >>Fire (but whatever turns you on), but when you brag on about how the 
    
    Can't elicit "another" comment about any "ring of fire", cause I've
    never commented on it before anyways.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.799 |  | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Sat Nov 09 1991 11:45 | 17 | 
|  |     You've made dozens of scatalogical references to me.  Not that I'm
    offended by your dirty language.  Only thing about it that offends
    me is the lazy writing that goes into it and how unfunny it is.
    
    As for not defending the empty seats but defende "Pgh fans," I'm
    afraid you'll have to accept the fact that it was these very same
    "Pgh fans" who failed to sell-out consecutive NLCSs.
    
    In Joe Face, buddy.  Last spring you were putting down fan support
    in another city and boasting about "Pgh fans"; this year your defending
    NLCS games with thousands of empty seats for lack of fan support (but
    plenty of feign support).  
    
    If we take anything out of this it's that the ticket mix-up story from
    last year was FaKe.
    
    MrT
 | 
| 3.800 | Glavine wins Cy | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 13 1991 15:15 | 2 | 
|  |     Tom Glavine of the Atlanta Braves was named the NL Cy Young Award
    winner for 1991.
 | 
| 3.801 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Wed Nov 13 1991 16:16 | 8 | 
|  |     re.800
    
    Lee Smith came in second, and John Smiley of the Bucs earned himself a
    $50,000 incentive from a clause in his contract that if he finished in
    the top 3 in the voting for the Sie Yung, he got the extra cash.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.802 | Leyland or Cox?  Or someone else? | SHALOT::MEDVID | cute in a stupidass way | Wed Nov 13 1991 16:37 | 7 | 
|  |     Who do you think the NL manager of the year will be, Leyland or Cox? 
    Last to first is pretty impressive and will probably earn Cox the
    votes, but I've got to give my personal nod to Leyland for pulling the
    Pirates together after the spring training fiascos and clinching the
    division so early.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.803 | Cox already won a coupla weeks, ago, dan'l... ;-( | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Nov 13 1991 16:53 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.804 | fwiw | FRETZ::HEISER | I don't feel tardy | Wed Nov 13 1991 18:11 | 6 | 
|  |     Re: Glavine
    
    He reportedly is a decent hockey player too.  Decent enough to get
    drafted by an NHL team.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.805 |  | CAMONE::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Wed Nov 20 1991 13:33 | 26 | 
|  | Well, the other evening I had an opportunity to catch the 
Greatest Moments In Baseball on SPORTSchannel.
It was Game 6, 1952 World Series, NY Yankees vs Brooklyn Dodgers.
What an experience!
To see guys like Mickey Mantle, Jackie Robinson, Carl Furillo, 
Phil Rizuto, Billy Martin....  What a rush.  To see Campanella play.
It was interesting in many ways too, because the TV coverage was
primitive at best, and clearly the play by play guy (who doubled
for color) called it more like a radio game with a few TVisms than
what we're used to today...
I never thought about it before, but there were no batting helmets
back then!
And considering that Brooklyn moved out to LA in the year I was born,
it was neat to see what it was like when they were still in Ebbets field....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.806 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Nov 20 1991 13:41 | 10 | 
|  |     I watched it for a while and one of the things I noticed was how much
    more quickly the game was played:
    
    1.  Pitchers threw strikes and didn't nibble.  They worked quickly.
    2.  Batters didn't step out on every pitch.  In fact, they seldom
        stepped out at all.
    
    I wish it could be like that now.  
    
    John
 | 
| 3.807 |  | CAMONE::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Wed Nov 20 1991 16:29 | 3 | 
|  | Also, many more batters had an amazingly open stance!
Perhaps it was because of the dimensions of Ebbets Field, I don't know....
 | 
| 3.808 |  | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Thu Nov 21 1991 15:59 | 5 | 
|  |     
    	Terry Pendleton won the MVP.  Bonds wonders if his attitude
    	had anything to do with it.  <snicker>
    
    	Claybone
 | 
| 3.809 | I wish they would have dealt him | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | things that make you go hmmmm... | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:50 | 3 | 
|  |     All that talent....
    
    ... and the brains of an ice cube.... Bonds needs to get a clue...
 | 
| 3.810 |  | PTOVAX::JACOB | My Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!! | Mon Nov 25 1991 22:09 | 5 | 
|  |     Expos traded Galaraga(sp?) to the Cards for pitcher Ken Hill, today.
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.811 |  | OLDTMR::RACZKA | Cant cheat with notes, gotta sing em | Sat Dec 07 1991 13:24 | 12 | 
|  |     I know that this is late
    
    But the LA DODGERS sent Tim Belcher to the REDS for 
    Eric (.44 magnum) Davis
    
    They also resigned Orel and picked up Tom Candiotti
    
    Now all we need is a GOOD first baseman (Wally Joyner??)
    and wait for Spring Training to start (-:
    
    Go Dodgers!
    
 | 
| 3.812 |  | PEACHS::MITCHAM | Never scratch a mounted monkey | Fri Dec 13 1991 07:28 | 3 | 
|  |     Otis Nixon signed a 2-year contract with Atlanta yesterday.
    
    -Andy
 | 
| 3.813 | Reds and Mets are the winners of the Hot Stove League | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RedSox,Broncos,MoriaLasch | Fri Dec 13 1991 09:33 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.814 |  | FDCV07::KING | Be nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!! | Fri Dec 13 1991 10:02 | 3 | 
|  |     Me thinks the Dodgers came away as the winners.....
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.815 | Royals landed what they wanted also | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Fri Dec 13 1991 10:48 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.816 | Ballclub, ballclub, ballclub, ballclub | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RedSox,Broncos,MoriaLasch | Fri Dec 13 1991 11:23 | 4 | 
|  |     	...and Lou (Costello) Gorman watched every possible Red Sox
    trade go by the boards.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.817 |  | CAMONE::WAY | You'll be left with empty arms | Mon Feb 24 1992 09:13 | 19 | 
|  | Happened to catch Game 4 of the 1969 World Series yesterday
on Sports Channel.
What a rush to see all those ballplayers that I remember from my youth....
Boog Powell, Ron Swoboda (un-CONSCIOUS catch in RF to keep the Mets 
in it), Tug McGraw, Elrod Hendricks, Cleon Jones, Budd Harrelson,
Donn McClendon.....
The only thing that spoiled the afternoon for me was they showed an
ad for a videotape of the 1986 World Series, and every Sox fan in the
world can guess which highlight they showed.   I damn neared choked
on my beer......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.818 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The Devil(dog) made me do it. | Mon Feb 24 1992 13:56 | 3 | 
|  |     That's Clendenon.
    
    No need to thank me.
 | 
| 3.819 |  | CAMONE::WAY | You'll be left with empty arms | Mon Feb 24 1992 14:00 | 12 | 
|  | >    That's Clendenon.
>    
>    No need to thank me.
Right you are.  I knew that too.
However, if you'll notice that the time stamp was before 10am, you'll
notice that I was still on weekend time, and not yet awake.....8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.820 |  | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The Devil(dog) made me do it. | Mon Feb 24 1992 14:08 | 1 | 
|  |     O.k. you are forgiven. I'm still on weekend time. Mah haid hurts.
 | 
| 3.821 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | The ProdiROGERgal Son Returns! | Tue Mar 03 1992 08:21 | 6 | 
|  |     	Sandberg signed a contract extension that will pay him 7.1 million
    dollars a year when it kicks in.  How can these owners blame
    arbitration for the huge salaries when they basically set the worth
    of players with these kind of contracts?
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.822 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 08:41 | 23 | 
|  | Wow.
This is really starting to get ridiculous.  I mean 7.1 million dollars
a year.   I'm no expert, but it sounds to me like that money would go
a long way towards finding a cure for leukemia, or helping to build
a shelter for homeless people.
Is anyone (and I mean anyone) really WORTH 7.1 million a year?  For playing
ball? 
Hell, 7.1 million would go a long way if you pumped it into programs to
increase American technology and stuff.....
And this guy is getting it for playing baseball?
Sorry if this seems like a downer, but I really think this is getting
ridiculous.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.823 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Mar 03 1992 08:56 | 4 | 
|  |        These guys are worth whatever the Chowderhaid owners wanna pay them.
    I have no sympathy for MLB owners. That's why I go to 1 game every
    couple years.
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.824 | Second-tier players not worth it; Sandberg every penny | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:07 | 20 | 
|  | 
    Sandberg's contract is being reported as a $7 million/year deal, but it
    was actually tacked on as an extension to his current 1992 contract (a
    paltry $2.1 mil) that leaves him at just over $6 million/year.  Not
    that it makes much difference, but over the five year period, the
    contract is worth only slightly more than Bonilla's.  I have less
    complaint with Sandberg's contract than Bonilla's because Sandberg is 
    a bonafide Hall of Famer who truly *is* the Chicago Cubs.  He's one of 
    the few that's probably worth $10 million/year to his club (my own 
    favorite Cal Ripken, whom the Orioles are dragging their feet with,
    being another...).
    
    Honest question: why do people protest baseball based on what the
    players make rather than the cost to the consumer?  I mean, hockey
    players generally don't make squat but it costs a small fortune to go
    to a game (at least around here), but people don't complain much.  
    Isn't that backwards?
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.825 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Owner of 'This Old F_____g House!' | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:16 | 21 | 
|  |     
    >>contract is worth only slightly more than Bonilla's.  I have less
    >>complaint with Sandberg's contract than Bonilla's because Sandberg is 
    >>a bonafide Hall of Famer who truly *is* the Chicago Cubs.
    
    I agree.  Bonilla is a stiff who CAN hit for power and average, but
    absolutely SUCKS in the field.  Average to below average defense.
    
    The Pirates payroll this year is somewhere in the region of $30-35 mil.
    If they sold the same amount of seats at Three Rivers as they did
    lasted year, they bring in ~$18-22 mil.  Add to that concessions and
    endorsements and you still don't meet the payroll.  These morons, both
    players and owners, will feel the real pinch when the nexted TV
    contract time comes up.  The league will have to go to salary caps or
    revenue sharing across the league, or teams in the small markets will
    be playing out of the back of a moving van.  I personally feel the
    Pirates will be in some other city within 5 years unless something is
    done.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.826 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:19 | 16 | 
|  | Glenn,
You raise an excellent point.  I'd never thought of it that way.  I can
sit in the bleachers at the Sox games for $7 (or a voucher if Hawk has
procured the tickets) yet to go to a Whalers game, the cheap seat are $15!
I realize that Sandberg is a franchise player, but the dollar amounts are
just starting to boggle my mind.
I wonder if hockey arenas were larger (say on the order of the Hoosier
Dome) if the prices would be lower.  It would seem so.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.827 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Owner of 'This Old F*@#$%g House'!!! | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:24 | 14 | 
|  |     
>>I wonder if hockey arenas were larger (say on the order of the Hoosier
>>Dome) if the prices would be lower.  It would seem so.....
    
    Good point. 'Saw.
    
    Figger the hawkey teams play 40 home games in 16,000-17,000 seat
    houses, whilst the baseball teams play 81 home games in 50k-60k
    houses.
    
    Cheap seats in Pgh go for $4.50, or on Buck night, $1.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.828 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:33 | 11 | 
|  | And if you think about it, they play hoops in the Hoosier Dome
(which seats 74,500 for Wrasslemania) and the hoops court is smaller
than a hockey rink, so the people up in the nosebleed seats should
be able to see....
The Hartford Civic Center is about 13,9 I think, although they've had
few sellouts this year....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.829 |  | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:44 | 21 | 
|  | �  Honest question: why do people protest baseball based on what the
�  players make rather than the cost to the consumer?  I mean, hockey
�  players generally don't make squat but it costs a small fortune to go
�  to a game (at least around here), but people don't complain much.
�  Isn't that backwards?
Many sports fans, myself included, found years ago that the cost of going 
to a game prohibitative, and as a result, go to merely a couple of games a year.
We become TV fans.  The cost of cable coverage per month is far less than the 
cost of going to the park once a month.  As a result of this, the impact on the
cost of tickets is lessened, and our point of reference becomes how much a 
player makes in comparison to other players.  
All things considered, a second baseman being the highest paid plyer in baseball
is quite surprising.  I agree that he is a consistently excellent player, but a 
second baseman hardly has the impact on the game of, say a center fielder.  One
of the newpapers I read said that the contract is more or less a reward to 
Sandberg for his many years of toil. If this is really the case, then that's 
great, and more power to him.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.830 |  | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Mar 03 1992 09:53 | 11 | 
|  |     Don't forget the HUGE difference in radio and tv contracts, and
    following that, the amount baseball teams cain charge for advertizing
    at the park. All in all that's a pretty big difference. People know
    hockey has no big contract with TV and the local agreements are
    penny-ante compared to baseball thus the smaller salaries for hockey
    players. 
    Percentage of ticket sale generation revenue to overall revenue
    in baseball is much smaller in baseball than hockey.
    
    MikeL
     
 | 
| 3.832 | if I read the article correctly | CNTROL::CHILDS | The SYSTEM has spung a leak | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:03 | 8 | 
|  | 
 not to mention the nice little 32K bonus all the players got as their part
 of the liscensing and selling of equipment....of course the union kept 1/2
 just in case of a strike.....
 Atleast Sandberg is an everyday player. IMO pitchers are the worst offenders..
 mike
 | 
| 3.833 | Operating cost analysis doesn't mean much to the consumer... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:16 | 23 | 
|  |     
    That's overanalyzing, guys.  Why should you care about stadium size,
    merchandizing, and TV dollars when you shell out your money for
    tickets?  Do you really say to yourself "well the Bruins don't have a
    national television contract and I understand the owner's predicament
    so I don't feel so bad about plunking down the 25-30 dollars for a
    ticket"?  I know I don't.  I feel a gut-level reaction to the money 
    that's vacated my wallet.  Less than $200 a year for a partial season 
    ticket (28 games) for an excellent centerfield bleacher seat doesn't 
    feel bad to me, so I go for it.  And as Jake indicates, due to park 
    size the Red Sox have the highest cheap-seat ticket price in the league.
    
    Imagine, in 1992, $1 a ticket for selected games and all sorts of other 
    $2-$5 family bargains to see a two-time division champion as in 
    Pittsburgh!  And yet if you go to Pittsburgh (as I just did) people are 
    still seething mad at the Pirates at the same time they're shelling out 
    5-10 times that cost to sell out games for the Penguins and the 
    mediocre Steelers.  My reaction as a baseball fan is to say let Bonilla 
    and Bonds go if they want and I'll enjoy the action at such a price just 
    the same...
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.834 | You buyin' tonight,Glenn?! 8^)'s | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:30 | 17 | 
|  |     Glenn,
    I never said I felt bad for the hockey owners. I understand the
    financials of both sports and I feel that I get a better bang for
    my buck ( albeit more at the Gahden) by watching not-so-overpaid
    hockey players. I perceive, perhaps falsely, a hungrier athlete
    on ice. And I loves baseball. But knowing how much GD money both
    the owners and players make from huge stadium,TV and merchandizing
    and not my paltry ticket price ( in comparsison to hockey) then
    I say, they better not raise the ticket prices appreciably. All in
    all, we all pay for it in the long run.
    
    Final thoughts?? I'll go to more baseball games 'cuz it's more
    affordable, but if I could afford it,and I ain't bitchin',I'd git
    hockey season tix. 
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.835 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:41 | 6 | 
|  | �      Maybe because it seems foolish to pay someone six million dollars
�      a year to play a game and someone else eighteen thousand a year to
�      teach our kids.       
    
    Yeah, but do people pay $7-20 a pop to and/or $8-10/month for cable to
    watch a teacher in action?
 | 
| 3.836 | I'll buy for the "hungry" SPORTShroomers... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 03 1992 10:57 | 21 | 
|  | 
    Agreed that all that matters is whether you feel you're getting your
    money's worth (with anything, not just sports, and including beer!), 
    Mike.  To me, for whatever reason, player salaries don't enter into 
    it much.  I do pay attention to salaries and the business end of the
    game, but really only to the extent that I feel there could be damage 
    done to the sport (like in baseball's small markets).  Other than that, 
    I figure there's all sorts of injustices regarding distribution of
    wealth in the world so I'm not going to get hung up on just this one
    (which in cumulative doesn't amount to a hill of beans anyway), where 
    as with any job the employee generally gets paid relative to the money 
    he brings into the company. 
    
    At a personal level, all the athletes in all the major professional
    sports are making so much money compared to what's needed to subsist in
    this world that I have a hard time generalizing about one group versus 
    another.  After some cut-off point around a couple hundred grand 
    (accounting for the shortness of career), it's all relative to me...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.837 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:10 | 16 | 
|  | Yeah, agreed.
To me, a player's salary really doesn't enter into my enjoyment of
the game.  (Unless we're talking John "Sweet Boy" Cullen).
But the amounts of money these guys are making, even considering shortness
of career is amazing.  With investments (good ones) and pulling some money
out to go to school (law school, med school etc) these guys have it made.
It would be nice to see some of this money that they are being paid being
put into something really worthwhile....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.838 | Unimaginable...... | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:26 | 22 | 
|  |     
    Welcome to the Theatre of the Absurd, folks!
    
    Just to sprinkle a little more "jealousy dust" on the plate,
    have you ever figured how many years/decades/lifetimes you would
    have to work at your present $$$ level to equal the money these
    guys will "earn" in one year?
    
    Since we're in the Theatre, let's not stop at professional athletes.
    Just for giggles, doit with rock singers and tee vee folks like Bill
    Cosby.
    
    Then remember what a terror it is to make "essential" ends meet each
    month and the sweat and stress you live with on a daily basis.
    
    For me, it goes so far beyond depressing that I came around to the see
    the absolute lunacy and humor of how %#*& we are!
    
    I remain,
    churning the treadmill,
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.839 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:31 | 4 | 
|  | �It would be nice to see some of this money that they are being paid being
�put into something really worthwhile....
    
    Alot of professional athletes do charity work and make contributions.
 | 
| 3.840 |  | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Forgot to cut my imbecilical cord | Tue Mar 03 1992 11:58 | 10 | 
|  |     
    So right about the Stallones and the Cosbys and The Michael Jacksons
    making the same kind of dough and nobody seems to begrudge the fact.
    
    Sanberg pulls down around $44K per game on the average.  BTW, what does
    a Marino or a Montana get paid on a per-game basis?  Methinks it's
    quite a bit more.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.841 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | The ProdiROGERgal Son Returns! | Tue Mar 03 1992 12:27 | 6 | 
|  |     	People see most entertainers as intelligent (not so), but view 
    most athletes as stupid (also not so).  I would love to see how
    the owners are going to justify a lockout next spring.  Their motto
    could be "Save us from ourselves".
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.842 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 13:43 | 10 | 
|  | Actually, I don't think entertainers' salaries (income, whatever) doesn't
always get the same amount of press that athletes do.
I mean, when you think about it, we hear almost weekly how so-and-so
got a record salary etc etc etc.
Usually, we don't hear that often about what Sly makes or Michael Jackson...
'Saw
 | 
| 3.843 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Mar 03 1992 14:01 | 3 | 
|  |        The entertainers mentined make Sandberg money for ONE album or
    movie. They make athletes look like paupers.
                                       Denny
 | 
| 3.844 |  | RUGBY1::way | You'll be left with empty arms | Tue Mar 03 1992 14:23 | 8 | 
|  | Now you know why I'm gonna write a novel someday....
Writers don't make as much as movie stars, but they make more than
I do....  Plus, it's something I know how to do.  I think I can spin
a pretty good yarn when I have to....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.845 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | The ProdiROGERgal Son Returns! | Tue Mar 03 1992 14:28 | 6 | 
|  |     	I think I'll write a novel someday about how much money
    entertainers and athletes make.  I read somewhere that the four
    starting pitchers for the Mets make more money than the entire Houston
    Astros team.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.846 | New twist on Baseball Clasics | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Getting Rich: The United Way | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:59 | 52 | 
|  | 
From USA TODAY:
A modern twist on some baseball 'classics':
The  modern version of Satchel Paige's six famous secrets to staying 
young:
1.  Avoid short-term contracts, which angry up the blood.
2.  If your general manager disputes you, lie down and pacify yourself 
with thoughts of free agency.
3.  Keep the deferred payments flowing, no matter which team you move 
to.
4.  Go very light on the vices, such as extra batting practice or team 
photos.  Being unduly conscientious isn't restful.
5.  Avoid free autographs at all times.
6.  Don't look back.  The IRS may be gaining on you.
The modern version of "Casey at the Bat":
The outlook wasn't brilliant for the Mudville nine that day.
The players wanted millions, and the owner wouldn't pay.
And when Cooney went free agency, and Barrows did the same
A prickly silence fell upon the agents of the game.
A struggling few got up to go, in deep despair.  The rest
CLung to that hope which 'springs eternal in the human brest.'
They thought if only, somehow, fans would give the owner fault
He'd have to put up tons of dough and let Casey at the vault.
But the owner disliked Casey, and his slumping RBI
'And overpaid to boot,' he said, as he looked them in the eye
So upon the stricken multitude, grim meloncholy sought
For there seemed little chance of Casey's getting to the vault
Oh, somewhere in this favoured land, the sun is shining bright
THe band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light
ANd somewhere agents are laughing, with profits unabated
But there is no joy in MUdville - mighty Casey just got traded.
T---
The modern "Take Me Out To The Ballgame"
Take me out to the ballgame, take me out to the crowd
Box seats here in right, thirty bucks for two.
Parking or hot dogs, they'll stick it to you.
And we'll pay, pay, pay for the home team.
Who cares, they hit .213?
And if they don't win, we'll still do it again at the old ballgame
 | 
| 3.847 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Thu Mar 05 1992 11:23 | 13 | 
|  |     The Cubs rejected a vote that would've sent them and the Cards to the
    NL West and sent Atlanta and Cincinnati to the NL East starting next
    season.  They were afraid it might cut into their mega-profits because
    WGN would end up with many late games due to the Flubs playing on the
    Coast more often.  However, some West Coast owners offered to move up
    some starting times but the Flubs still said no.  And another thing is
    teams will probably be playing a 13-12 schedule next year (13 games
    against each team in their division, 12 against each team from the
    other division), so regardless of which division the Cubs are in they 
    would still play pretty much the same schedule.
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.848 |  | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Mar 05 1992 11:52 | 4 | 
|  |     Ha ha ha, very good, JD.  I was laughing so hard, I couldn't find
    you're slam on Bhanstan.  :*)
    
    lEe
 | 
| 3.849 | Look at a MAP | SALES::THILL |  | Thu Mar 05 1992 11:53 | 8 | 
|  | What about the Braves and Reds, you'd think they'd get pretty tired of all 
the travel? They are in the EASTERN time zone to boot. I wonder why they didn't 
make it more geographically alligned when they first did this in 1968?
For some reason, Atlanta always seems to get stuck in the Western divisions. The
Falcons and braves are, as were the Flames and Hawks when they had that format.
Tom/Dread 
 | 
| 3.850 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD |  | Thu Mar 05 1992 12:04 | 4 | 
|  |     	lEe, there was no slam on Boston because the article was from
    the USA Today.  8^)
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.851 |  | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Achoo! You're SO Good Looking | Thu Mar 05 1992 12:08 | 5 | 
|  |     Nice p_name /Don - stay up all night thinking that one up!
    
    ;-)
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.852 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD |  | Thu Mar 05 1992 12:20 | 1 | 
|  |     	P-Name strike 'cuz I'm in sympathy wif' the NHL players.
 | 
| 3.853 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Mar 05 1992 12:36 | 5 | 
|  |     SH*T, a 13-12 balanced schedule sucks big time. Makes no sense
    toplay more games out of division then in division. gag!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.854 | rough notes | 28918::JACOB | Send Solar Panel Wax, Soon!!! | Mon Mar 09 1992 23:59 | 25 | 
|  |     
    Pittsburgh Pirate manager Jim Leyland's new contract will pay him $3.7
    million over the nexted five years.
    
    Joe Nuxhall, the youngest man to appear in a major league game when he
    pitched at age 15  for Cincinnati, is recovering from prostrate cancer
    surgery.  Nuxhall is hoping to return to his job as Cincinnati color
    commentator within the next two weeks.
    
    The Pirates Steve Buechele, everyone assumed, was a shoe-in to win the
    Gold glove at third base in the American League, even though he spent
    the lasted month of the season with the Pirates.  After all, he had
    just set a record for fewest errors.  But the gold Glove went to White
    Sox' Robin Ventura.  It was implyed that Ventura got the Gold Glove
    becuase he had the better OFFENSIVE year.  Ventura batted .284, hit 23
    HR's and drove in 100 runs while playing on a pennant contending team. 
    His defensive statistics, you ask????  Ventura's average of one error
    for every 24 chances was WORST in the American League and his 18 errors
    were the most by ANY A.L. 3rd baseman.   Great Gold Glove statistics,
    eh??
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.855 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Tue Mar 10 1992 12:30 | 7 | 
|  |     Gold Gloves can be bogus. It *should* reward defense, but in fact
    offensive players and reps often win out. Many feel that Clete Boyer
    should have won a few GG's in the 60's, but Brooks Robinson got 'em
    because of his superior power hitting. Barry Larkin should have gotten
    one a couple of years ago, but Oz had the rep. Pete O'Brien is as good
    as Mattingly (according to many experts), but didn't ring up the
    monster #'s that Don did from 85-89, so he lost out ...
 | 
| 3.856 | Buechele needs to learn the Pittsburgh turf, however... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 10 1992 12:55 | 27 | 
|  | 
   > Gold Gloves can be bogus. It *should* reward defense, but in fact
   > offensive players and reps often win out. Many feel that Clete Boyer
   > should have won a few GG's in the 60's, but Brooks Robinson got 'em
   > because of his superior power hitting.
    
    Horse manure!  I'm not saying that Brooks Robinson deserved the Gold
    Glove each and every year, but he didn't win them because of his bat.
    Brooks Robinson is just about everyone's pick as the greatest defensive
    third baseman of all time.  Reputation carried him the last few years,
    which is unfortunate.  Who sold you this "power hitting" bill of goods, 
    Doc?
    
    Steve Buechele would have won the Gold Glove last year, hands down, if
    he'd stayed in the league.  His move to the NL, and not Robin Ventura's
    offense, almost certainly cost him the award (offense, or overall
    reputation, has definitely been a factor in other cases...).
    
    By the way, errors and fielding percentage are almost useless as a
    measure of defensive ability.  The difference in number of errors 
    between the worst and best fielding percentages pales in comparison to
    the difference in the number of balls successfully fielded.  More 
    errors is often the penalty for having great range.  Ventura did pretty 
    well with his assist totals; Buechele did even better, though.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.857 |  | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Mar 10 1992 13:02 | 11 | 
|  |     Doc,
    You probably saw Brooksie, but were you old enuf to actually see
    Cletus play??  He was good but twas no Brooksie. Trust me. Clete's
    salad days were a tad earlier,I think, than Brooksie's
    
    Your eldar speaketh,
    MikeL
    
    BTW didn't Belanger cop a few Gold Gloves?   Now there was a power
    hitter for ya. Think he took batting lessons from Dean Chance.
    
 | 
| 3.858 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Tue Mar 10 1992 13:07 | 13 | 
|  |     >	BTW didn't Belanger cop a few Gold Gloves?   Now there was a power
    >   hitter for ya. Think he took batting lessons from Dean Chance.
   
    Yes, Belanger won at least a few Gold Gloves.  Had trouble keeping
    his head above the Mendoza line, but with all the sluggers the O's had
    in their heyday they could afford to keep a defensive specialist in the
    lineup.
    
    And no discussion of "all-time greatest defensive 3B" is complete
    without mentioning one Michael Jack Schmidt...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.859 | tossup | SHALOT::HUNT | Virginia -- 1992 ACC Women's Hoops Champs | Tue Mar 10 1992 13:44 | 7 | 
|  |  �   And no discussion of "all-time greatest defensive 3B" is complete
 �   without mentioning one Michael Jack Schmidt...
 
 Thank you.   For my $$$, either Brooks or Schmitty can hold down the hot
 corner.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.860 | I still say rep and O can overshadow the majority of cases | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Tue Mar 10 1992 14:33 | 10 | 
|  |     Glenn, you say my contention on GG's is horse manure, but then tell me
    that Ventura deserved it over Steve B. because he changed leagues ?
    
    Thanks for proving my case. Ventura was ok, but nothing special IMO. As
    for Brooks/Boyer - I don't have an opinion on those two, but it is
    often a case used by the anit-GG's (for lack of a better term).
    
    And you never said anything about O'Brien/Mattingly, or Larkin/Smith.
    
    Keep trying ...
 | 
| 3.861 | As you say, keep trying... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Mar 10 1992 14:43 | 10 | 
|  |     
    I agreed with 95% of what you said, Doc (don't be so sensitive!).  I
    only disagreed about the part about Brooks Robinson, where you made it
    sound like, in the rational for the 16 straight Gold Gloves, defense 
    was almost an afterthought.  The emotion of my response?  Well,
    Brooksie was my favorite player... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.862 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Tue Mar 10 1992 17:11 | 5 | 
|  |     re. Brooks R./Glenn's fav ...
    
    Never would have guessed it
    
    :-)
 | 
| 3.863 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Owner of 'This Old F_____g House!' | Tue Mar 10 1992 23:43 | 5 | 
|  |     Hoo was the firsted baseman on the Orioles whence Brooksie was in his
    prime???
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.864 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Sometimes you're a windshield... | Wed Mar 11 1992 01:44 | 1 | 
|  |     Boog?
 | 
| 3.865 |  | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Wed Mar 11 1992 08:36 | 16 | 
|  | Definitely Boog Powell
Without placing a specific year, here's what I remember as the lineup:
 C Elrod Hendricks
1b Boog Powell
2b Bobby Grich
SS Mark Belanger
3B Brooks Robinson
LF Frank Robinson
CF Don Buford
RF Curt Blefary
 P Jim Palmer
 P Mike Cuellar
 P Dave McNally
 P Pat Dobson and a host of others 
 | 
| 3.866 | Like yesterday... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Mar 11 1992 08:47 | 8 | 
|  |     
    Paul Blair played center, Frank Robinson played right most of the time,
    and Buford/Blefary/Rettenmund et al played left.  Also, that bane of
    all humanity Davey Johnson played second for the bulk of the glory
    years 1969-71, with Bobby Grich coming in after his deposal.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.867 | Just curious | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Wed Mar 11 1992 08:50 | 6 | 
|  | What was wrong with Davey Johnson?  I don't remember much about his playing 
except that he had a good rookie year, and showed a lot of promise.  After that
I thought he was just another mediocre second sacker.  Was he a club house 
problem or an on the field problem?
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.868 | Grich was better, so Johnson became expendable... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:29 | 7 | 
|  |     
> What was wrong with Davey Johnson?
    
    He was the Mets' manager.  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.869 |  | RUGBY1::way | Son House RULES! | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:44 | 10 | 
|  | If you catch the Sports Channel re-run of Game 4, 1969 WS, you'll catch
the Orioles lineup in all its glory.
My God, I had forgotten just how big Boog was.  He was a Giant of a man.
I'd love to know where he is and what he's doing now....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.870 | Boog, Frank and Harmon - three big dudes | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey's gonna be a sister!!! | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:49 | 9 | 
|  | Boog was a big dude.  
Frank Howard was another huge guy of that era, as well as Harmon Killebrew.
I'd have to say that Powell did OK as a fielder, but that it was amazing that, 
at their size, Howard and Killebrew played Left Field and Third Base, 
respectively.   They'd probably DH today.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.872 | Commercials | MCIS2::CLAYBROOK |  | Wed Mar 11 1992 10:03 | 4 | 
|  |     I seem to remember Boog in some of the Miller Lite beer commercials
    when they first started coming out.
    
                                               Dan
 | 
| 3.873 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Wed Mar 11 1992 11:19 | 3 | 
|  |     Killebrew moved to 1B in the mid-late 60's. As for Davey Johnson,
    didn't he also hit 40 HR's for Atlanta the year that Aaron and Evans
    did ?
 | 
| 3.874 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Dem Pens is suprizing me!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 19:36 | 6 | 
|  |     Da Cubbies and the White Sox completed a trade today which sends George
    Bell to the ChiSox and the Cubs get an outfielder, something like Sammy
    Sosa, and a pitcher, Ken Patterson????.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.875 | Mets vote <write-lock>!!!!!! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Wed Apr 01 1992 09:27 | 23 | 
|  |     
    So over the weekend me and the F.E.W., along with my brother and his
    wife travelled down to Manhattan for a wedding.  After checking in
    at the Marriot (Financial Center) I had about an hour to kill
    before it was time to put on the suit and tie so I wandered down to
    the gift shop to buy a newspaper.
    
    Wound up plunking down $0.35 for "Newsday". (big deal right?)
    
    Big banner headlines  " SILENCE OF THE METS " with a picture of a
    NY Mets baseball cap on the cover.  Did anybody know that the Met team
    unanimously voted NOT to speak with the press?  It seems that they feel
    the press is out to get them with all the negative stories about them,
    (ie Cove) and they're gonna retaliate by not speaking.
    
    Po TCM, seems like he's not gonna get any first person quotes thisted
    year.......
    
    I remain,
    thinking of not speaking to the press either......
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.876 |  | USCTR2::NAHEARN |  | Wed Apr 01 1992 16:01 | 10 | 
|  |     Kev,
    
    I did, in fact, know that the Mets weren't speaking to the
    media....BUT,  I'm not speaking to any of you....so I couldn't tell
    you!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
 | 
| 3.877 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Thursday is D-Day | Wed Apr 01 1992 16:04 | 7 | 
|  |     Great,
    
    With the Mets keeping their mouths shut, the relative intelligence
    level of the NL news goes up 2 levels.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.878 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 02 1992 04:53 | 10 | 
|  |     Old hat Kev about the Mets was in the NYM notesfile much earlier this
    week. Anyways good move to not answer non-baseball questions which is
    what I beleive they really voted on. Incidentally 99% of the time one
    does not even need to read the papers or watch the news to know
    whatmost players will say after a game.
    
    re: Jake who cares about intelligence level, just win baby!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.879 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 02 1992 04:53 | 4 | 
|  |     re: pname - Jake why is Thursday d-day????
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.880 | Heard it here 1st by me!   ;^) | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:00 | 12 | 
|  |     TcM,
    
    Perhaps on "the other" notefile (which btw, I don't even RON in)
    it's old news but over here in fun fun land, it wasn't reported
    earlier that I.
    
    so there!
    
    I remain,
    a journalism junkie,
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.881 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:21 | 6 | 
|  |     > Perhaps on "the other" notefile (which btw, I don't even RON in)
    
    And Kev you call yourself a New Yorker. I am truly dismayed and
    disappointed in you. (partial :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
 | 
| 3.882 |  | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Intel Inside (tm) | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:30 | 3 | 
|  |     How 'bout dat Bobby Bonilla...
    
    
 | 
| 3.883 | ha! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:08 | 14 | 
|  |     TcM,
    
    Dismaying and disappointing New Yorkers is a lot like rugby!
    
    an an uther thing, I don't call myself a noo yawkah, I'm a
    lung-guylander and I dont do baizeball.  Too boring 'cept
    for get togethers.
    
    hth,
    
    I remain,
    EEEEEEE EEEEEEE EEEEEEE 
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.884 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles 162-0 | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:24 | 1 | 
|  |     No doubt about it, gonna be a rematch of '69 this year. :-)
 | 
| 3.885 | Phillie News | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 10:25 | 20 | 
|  |     Saw a picture in the this morning's paper of Lenny Dykstra getting hit
    by a pitch. Turns out there is a fracture in his wrist and he'll be out
    for awhile.
    
    Also noted in the picture that the Phillies were wearing the uniforms
    they used to wear in the 50's. The vertical large stripe that ran down
    the sides of the uniforms was gone and the word "Phillies" was written
    across the front with stars above the i's. The "P" on the hats was the
    old one, too....no baseball inside the loop. The color also seemed to
    be a lighter read (almost the same red as Cincy) instead of the
    burgundy.
    
    Bob Hunt, is this for real or just a one game thing? I loved those
    Phillie iniforms. Recalss those baseball cards of Richie (I belong in
    the Hall of Fame) Ashburn, Robin Roberts at Grady Hammer I used to
    have.
    
    Rich
    
    
 | 
| 3.886 | Phils lose 8th straight opener ... Sigh. | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 10:31 | 13 | 
|  | The new-old Phillies uniforms are for keeps.   They kept them under wraps all 
spring long right up until the first pitch yesterday.   
Supposedly, the sporting goods stores in the Philly area are up to their 
strike zones in sight-unseen backorders for the new-old style.  I think it's 
great ... I saw my first Phils game in '64 when they wore this style.
Dykstra finished the game yesterday with the broken bone.  Any word how long 
he'll be out ???   These last few days have stirred up Rotis rosters like no 
other spring in recent memory.   Fortunately, ours has avoided any problems 
so far (knock on wood).
Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.887 | Sigh! | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 10:52 | 9 | 
|  |     You cain sigh all yer want about the Phils, Bob ( somewhat
    justifiably), but at least ya gots ONE champeenship in the modern
    era, one more than a certain NE corridor team. Tell me, when was
    the last Phillies champeenship team before (80? 0r 81?).  And didn't
    the old beloved Philly A's chalk up a few "C's" in the 30's??
    
    MikeL
    
    
 | 
| 3.888 | Try 97 years before the first ring | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:20 | 15 | 
|  | � Tell me, when was the last Phillies champeenship team before (80? 0r 81?). 
None.  Nada.  Zip.  Zilch.  The Phillies 1980 World Series crown was the 
first and only in franchise history.   And we're talking about a team that 
was formed in the year 1883.    It took 97 years for a title.   BoSox fans 
can piss and moan all they want about title futility but you guys ain't even 
close to suffering for 97 years.
The Philadelphia A's won 5 World Series but Connie Mack refused to see the 
wisdom behind the farm system invented by Branch Rickey and they were just as 
pathetic as the Phils for long stretches as well.   Besides they left Philly 
in 1954 when I was still just a twinkle in my parents' eyes.
Bob Hunt  
 | 
| 3.889 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:29 | 9 | 
|  |     While in Philadelphia, the Athletics won pennants in 1905, 1910, 1911,
    1913, 1914, 1929, 1930 and 1931.  They won the World Series in 1910,
    1911, 1913, 1929 and 1930.  Their pennant streak was interrupted in
    1912 by the Red Sox and they lost the 1914 World Series to the Boston
    Braves.  Since moving to Oakland, they won pennants in 1972-1974 and
    1988-1990, and the World Series in 1972-1974 and 1989.  So, that's 14
    pennants and 9 World Series.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.890 |  | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:02 | 11 | 
|  |     didn't realize that that was the Phils only champeenship. But the
    Sox have lost more than their share of Series in imaginable ways.
    So we both cain piss and moan. At least you've personally witnessed
    one, Bob.
    
    MikeL
    Who doesn't want his gravestone to read "Never saw a RedSox World
    Series champion"
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.891 |  | RANGER::LEFEBVRE | Intel Inside (tm) | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:14 | 20 | 
|  |         <<< Note 3.888 by SCNDRL::HUNT "He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club" >>>
                    -< Try 97 years before the first ring >-
>� Tell me, when was the last Phillies champeenship team before (80? 0r 81?). 
>
>None.  Nada.  Zip.  Zilch.  The Phillies 1980 World Series crown was the 
>first and only in franchise history.   And we're talking about a team that 
>was formed in the year 1883.    It took 97 years for a title.   BoSox fans 
>can piss and moan all they want about title futility but you guys ain't even 
>close to suffering for 97 years.
    
    Good note as usual, Bob (tm).
    
    It's not the fact that Boston hasn't won the enchilada in 74 years (and
    counting), but how they go about losing it.  Three trips to the dance
    and all three winnable in 7 games.  Game 6 in '86 is just an
    exclamation point.
    
    Mark.
    
 | 
| 3.892 | Coincidence ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:22 | 33 | 
|  |  Hey, my deepest sympathies have been with BoSox fans for a long while now. 
 Hell, back in '88, I shocked this entire conference by organizing a "BoSox
 Bandwagon For Erstwhile NL Fans" after my Phillies had given up the ghost.
 Man, I can't imagine sports pain any worse than Game 6 in '86.   I
 sincerely hope the BoSox do win one someday.   The Sox owe their fans for
 their lifetime loyalty.  I really believe that.
 
 But the Phillies, despite the 1980 champeenship, have almost as phutile a
 history of chokes as the BoSox do.   I know these have been recited in
 here before but here goes again ...
 
 1964 ... Phils lead the NL by 6� games with 12 to play.  Lose 10 straight
 and finish in 3rd place.   The Sox have *never* faded that badly in that
 tight a stretch of games.   I know they blew a 14 game lead to the Yanks
 in '78 but they took 3 months to bleed that one dry.
 
 1977 ... NLCS tied 1 game apiece with the Dodgers.  Game 3 in Philly, top
 of the ninth, Phils up 5-3, two outs, no one on.   Does this sound vaguely
 familiar ???   Lopes, Davalillo, Mota, Russell ... Lost 6-5.   Next night,
 tube insisted they play thru a rainstorm and the Phils bend over and die.
 
 1978 ... Game 4 NLCS, 10th inning, tie score.   Cey hits one to Garry
 Maddox, the reigning Gold Glove CF in the National League.  Clank.  Done.
 
 Phillies fans and Red Sox fans are kindred souls.  Don't let the 1980 ring
 change that fact.   Both clubs wear the Collar Of Doom.   It is one of
 life's eternal mysteries.
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  And yes, you can throw the Cubbies in on this pile, too.  But for
 some odd reason, I actually think the Cubs fans are happiest when their
 beloveds are grabbing some trachea.   Weird.
 | 
| 3.893 |  | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:33 | 24 | 
|  | Bob, I agree with a lot of what you said.
With a Red Sox fan, you just KNOW something is gonna happen.  Sitting in that
hotel room in Washington watching game 6 1986 and being a strike away, the
little voice in the back of my head was saying "Frank, don't get excited,
don't get too up -- SOMETHING is gonna happen".
Damned if the same thing didn't happen in '75.  So totally up after Pudge's
Titanic Blast in Game 6, but all the day of Game 7 at school I was like,
"Can't wait, but don't get too up --SOMETHING is gonna happen"...
It kills you, but after the initial wound heals up, you do wear your scars
proudly.....
I think with Cubbies fans, it's different, because my impression is that the
Cubs RARELY get that close.   Except against San Diego when the ball went
through Sandberg's legs....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.894 |  | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:35 | 14 | 
|  |     AH BELIEVE.
    You've convinced me, Robert. Kindred souls. Both don red. May we both
    get red sackcloth on Good Friday!!
    
    I remembered '64 colossal choke but fergot the late 70 Phils.
    It's a wonder that when these two teams meet in spring training
    there's not a killer tornado or something. Creepy. Imagine a
    Sox-Phils World Series!  And good observation about the Cubs' fans.
    However, since the Phils have that everlasting black mark of a
    champeenship, they will somehow be relegated behind the Cubbies and
    Sox fans on the Sufferin' Index (modern history so-to-speak).
    
    MikeL
     
 | 
| 3.895 | The almost club | SHALOT::MEDVID | it's just the way i smile, you said | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:42 | 4 | 
|  |     Any room on this sorrow bandwagon for Bucs fans due to the last two
    years or has Pittsburgh won too many along the way?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.896 | Twas Durham | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:43 | 7 | 
|  |  � Except against San Diego when the ball went through Sandberg's legs....
 
 That was Leon "Bull" Durham who played croquet wicket on that Padre
 grounder in the '84 NLCS that killed the Cubbies.   Yet another reason to
 hate Steve Garvey.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.897 | Been done | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:47 | 8 | 
|  |  � Imagine a Sox-Phils World Series!  
 
 1915, Red Sox 4, Phillies 1.  The Red Sox had some obscure young stud
 pitcher from some reform school in Baltimore.   Babe somebody ...  Never
 really amounted to much in Boston.   Sold him in '20 to the Yanks.   Faded
 into obscurity after that ...
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.898 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:50 | 5 | 
|  |     In Sunday's Worcester T&G they published a list of the timespans
    without a championship.  There are still several clubs out there that
    haven't won one in their entire history.  The Sox might not have one
    since 1918, but they've been in some of the more memorable championship
    series since then.
 | 
| 3.899 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:56 | 10 | 
|  |     I put the timespans in here at some point in the past.  White Sox and
    Cubs have gone longer than the Red Sox.
    
    A&W has often predicted the end of the world would come during the 9th
    inning of a tied 7th World Series game between the Red Sox and Cubs.
    
    Finally, a lot of the 'glitz' of being a Red Sox fan would disappear if
    they ever did win and exorcize the ghosts.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.900 | On being a Cubs fan | IAMOK::WASKOM | Goofy's Mom | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:27 | 15 | 
|  |     I happen to be a Cubs fan, although stuck in an AL city and without
    access to WGN.  So I'm not current on 'em.  (Other than they're in
    first -- along with a host of others -- today.)
    
    The Cubs really don't even get close.  As a fan, you don't expect this
    team to be any better than mediocre.  And so, what keeps bringing you
    back is the wonder of Wrigley Field.  The smell of peanuts and popcorn
    and beer.  The happy buzz of people enjoying an afternoon in the sun. 
    The grass and the ivy and the brick and the blue sky with puffy white 
    clouds.  The sound of the crack of the bat and the flapping of flags
    and the swish as the ball is thrown.  There's an innocence to being a
    Cubs fan that no other team, in any other league, seems able to match. 
    And every game is a party, of one sort or another.
    
    A&W
 | 
| 3.901 | Kinda like yesterday... had a %$%##$ great time at The Stadium ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:29 | 12 | 
|  | 
    > Finally, a lot of the 'glitz' of being a Red Sox fan would disappear if
    > they ever did win and exorcize the ghosts.
    
    Not for me.  I could deal with that just fine, thank you.  But then
    again, I've never really gotten caught up in this fatalistic doomsaying
    stuff.  I just try to enjoy it as it comes, and Red Sox baseball if
    nothing else has certainly been interesting over the years (and should
    continue to be so even if they win it all some day...)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.902 | And they think a new park will make them win...HA! | SALES::THILL |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:30 | 9 | 
|  |     Most of the teams that have never won it are post-1960 expansion teams
    I always thought these teams don't really count, but since a few of
    them have won more than a couple times they probably should. Now it's
    OK to not have won the whole enchilada, but to never have even been a
    contender since Eisenhower was president, now THAT's a disgrace. Every
    team has won at least a division title once, except the Rangers (who
    were second a couple of times) the Mariners and......
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.903 |  | CSGDEC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:34 | 21 | 
|  |     Glenn, I realized my statement was an over-broad generalization, but I
    couldn't think of a way to say it as succinctly.  Even glitz was a bad
    choice of word.
    
    There is a large sub-group of Red Sox fans who seem to take great
    pleasure in whining about how they come close and never win.  Bob Ryan
    continually bashes this group by telling them "If you think you have it
    so bad, move to Cleveland."  Among this group of fans are the so-called
    literati - John Updike, George Higgins, George Will and while he was
    alive, Bart Giamatti.  It's for this group that a lot of the fun will
    go out of being a fan - what else will they have to complain about?
    
    In my case, while I love good baseball, there are definite advantages
    to living in Cleveland and being an Indians fan.  There, you can walk
    up to the ticket window 10 minutes before the game and buy a great seat
    in most cases.  It's a reason to envy the folks on the shores of Lake
    Erie.  I first started going to Fenway Park in 1964 when I was 9, and I
    remember how easy it was to get good seats, even for the Yankees and
    even on weekends.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.904 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:39 | 5 | 
|  |        Speaking of the 'literati' types, I heard somewhere that Stephen
    King is donating some of his land (backyard) to the city of Bangor. He
    has, or will build, a replica of Fenway PArk there. I guess the various
    town teams will be able to use it.
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.905 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles 162-0 | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:42 | 6 | 
|  |     re a few back on the Cubs, to this day it still throws me for a loop to
    see a night game from Wrigley (even though they've had the lights for a
    few years now)...
    
    
    py                
 | 
| 3.906 | Break Like The Wind | SHALOT::MEDVID | it's just the way i smile, you said | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:42 | 5 | 
|  | >    He has, or will build, a replica of Fenway PArk there. 
    
    Probably using the same designer that did Spinal Tap's Stone Henge.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.907 | Been done before... | SALES::THILL |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:54 | 7 | 
|  |     Some guy in Kaintucky trucked over all the remains from Crosley Field
    in Cinncinati and built a replica of the old park. He has some of the
    outfield walls and part of the scoreboard. The rest was re-created. The
    ineresting thing I remember about Crosley was that there was no warning
    track, just an embankment sloping up to the outfield wall.
    
    Tom 
 | 
| 3.908 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | RIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992 | Wed Apr 08 1992 14:17 | 3 | 
|  |     John, another great advantage to Cleveland is that usually have your
    own personal vendor for most of the season, and if a few players get
    injured, you might be called upon to suit up !
 | 
| 3.910 |  | CSGDEC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 15:15 | 4 | 
|  |     Tommy, I have another reply where I explained myself further.  Keep
    reading after the one you answered.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.911 | Things will change | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 15:37 | 21 | 
|  |  � Should the Red Sox ever win the series, Boston will make the Mardi Gras
 � in New Orleans look like bingo at the Elks Hall but we will not lose
 � interest in our team because they've won it.
 
 Good line, Tommy, but you will lose *some* (not all) of the raw passion
 born out of lifelong desperation for a title.  
 
 Take it from me.   I enjoyed the hell outta the 1981 Phils season (right
 up until the strike) 'cause everytime you read or heard anything about the
 team, it was always "defending world champion Phillies".  Sweet music.
 
 I hated losing to the Expos in that divisional playoff thing in '81 but I
 couldn't curse the gods anymore and I didn't have that previously intense
 mixture of both dread and anticipation for the upcoming 1982.  
 
 It was done.  The cause was just.   The early '80s were very weird years
 for Phils phans, believe me.   The Phils weren't chokers anymore and you
 didn't know who to bash.  I'm serious ... even the '83 Series loss to the
 Orioles didn't put the city into as bad a funk as the '77 NLCS loss did.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.912 |  | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Wed Apr 08 1992 15:47 | 26 | 
|  | As a New York Giants football fan, perhaps I can shed some light on this.
I waited 20 years for the Giants to be in the Super Bowl.  The day of the
game I was a nervous wreck and wanted to be alone.
I watched the game unfold, and curiously enough, at half time I had a feeling
momentum might swing.  It did.
After 20 years of waiting, and 30 years (a generation) between Championships,
I was ecstatic.   No matter what else happened the next season, the Giants
had a Super Bowl win, and no one could take that away.
I didn't feel the passion was somewhat abated, instead I felt a peace, and
a new way to look at the team from there on out.   The next seasons were
disappoinments, but you could see that the team was always close.   Then
again in 90 they did it.
So as a Sox fan, I think there will be a TON of joy, a bit of relief, and
a sense of renewal......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.913 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:17 | 45 | 
|  |     My Dad helped me put the whole Red Sox thing in perspective. He grew up
    in Brooklyn and was a die hard Dodger fan. In those days, they were the
    Bums. Fans loved 'em anyway. They either stunk the place out or they
    came close. They were great at blowing the big one. Recall Ralph
    Branca.
    
    As the decade of the 40's came to a close, the Dodgers began to get
    better and better. Their fans became more and more rabid. The 50's came
    upon them and they continued to contend and the fans continued to turn
    out.
    
    They made it to the Series only to lose to the Yankees. Finally, they
    won their first WS. Brooklyn went bananas. 
    
    After the championship, the Dodgers continued to be adored and the
    fans continued their fanaticism. My Dad says it was just a way of life;
    rooting for "Da Dodjers". For those of you who watch the TV show
    "Brooklyn Bridge", according to my Dad, the kids adoration of the
    Dodghers accurately depict the feelings of the post championship era.
    
    I can't speak for Philiadelphia. Never lived there. But I can speak for
    Boston. The Red Sox have teased us since 1967. The Dodgers teased
    Brooklyn from 1947 on. The Red Sox are, indeed, a way of life. The
    mystique of Fenway park, the ghosts of Babe Ruth, Tris Speaker, Smokey
    Joe Wood and Cy Young continue to waft through the rusting steel
    girders. 
    
    Should the Sox win the thing, it will almost surpass the joy I felt
    when my first child was born. I will then see, in my imagination, a
    glow of light shining over Fenway that will keep drawing me. Yeah, I
    guess it IS a religious thing with me. 
    
    My Dad says that there was a lot of cynicism in Brooklyn, just like
    there is in Boston. The only difference between the 2, he says, is that
    Dodger fans just cried when O'Malley took the team west. He says Boston
    fans would be much more violent should anyone ever try to move the Sox.
    
    Interesting afterthought: O'Malley pleaded with the city of New York
    for a new stadium. He also looked for private investments. No private
    investments came. The city said no way. So he moved in 1958.
    Construction of Shea Stadium began 1 1/2 years later.
    
    Rich
    
    
 | 
| 3.914 |  | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPV | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:42 | 13 | 
|  |     
    See, being a Sox fan is unlike rugby.  It's like a huge boil on MrT's
    back that's been squeezed to the bursting point but never actually
    gives way.  Instead it continues to irritate and fester.  And every
    season is like seeing a new doctor who clams to have the right
    ingredients to effect a cure, but the damn thing is still there and
    the hope of relief is dashed once again.
    
    -Dickstah, still waiting for the blood- splattering, pus-spattering
     denouement.
    
    P.S. How'd I do, T?
    
 | 
| 3.915 | Walter O'Malley = Scum of the Earth | SALES::THILL |  | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:51 | 55 | 
|  |     re .913 Interesting analogy ther with the Brooklyn Dodgers. My father too 
    was a big Dodger fan, so I definitely can relate. 
    
    The thing about O'Malley moving them was that it was a carefully
    orchestrated plan that was clearly pre-meditated and motivted purely 
    by greed. In 1953, when the Braves moved to Milwaukee, their attendance
    boomed. People from all over the upper midwest flocked in droves to
    Milwaukee (even though this wasn't that much closer than Chicago). The
    Braves had some cash, and were able to sign better prospects (this was
    before the draft) and the Dodgers realized they would have to do
    something to compete. So, they traded farm team affiliations with the
    Cubs. 
    
    "What does that have to do with it?" you might ask. The Dodgers
    had St. Paul (Giants were in Minneapolis) and the Cubs had the LA
    Angels of the Pacific Coast League. That meant the Dodgers had
    territorial rights to LA, which by then was growing fast and was
    already a pretty big city. This was about 1955 or so. Meanwhile,
    like much of America, middle class people were leavig cities by droves
    and it was no longer a subway/bus/trolley ride to the ballpark, but a
    car trip. Parks like Ebbets Field and the Polo Grounds had very little
    parking, which was a problem for Dodger fans who were now driving in from
    Lawn Guylin. O'Malley wanted city officials do build them a new
    stadium. Well, if they did it for the Dodgers, they would have to do
    the same for the Giants, and perhaps later, the Yankees too. O'Malley
    proposed a stadium in the Sheepshead Bay section of Brooklyn, far from
    any subway line, but not far from highways leading to L.I. The plan fell
    through. The City proposed a stadium where Shea is now located, but it
    wasn't IN *Brooklyn*, so O'Malley said no. O'Malley proposed a domed
    stadium at the intersection of Atlantic & Flatbush Aves. near downtown.
    They would tear down city blocks to make sure there would be enough
    parking. The city was receptive to meet them part of the way, but then
    O'Malley pulled out, demading that the city pay for everything, and get
    notheing in return. City officials at the time said they would have
    ended up in jail if they had accepted his proposal. 
    
    In 1957 the Dodgers played several "home" games in Roosevelt Stadium in
    Jersey City. Attendance was still pretty good, as they drew over a
    million, which then was considered the milestone for a successful season. 
    
    Meanwhile, Horace Stoneham and the Giants realized they could hold the
    city hostage too, so they started making noise about moving. A lot of
    people didn't realize they weren't bluffing, because the only teams
    that had moved by then (Browns-Orioles, Bos-Mil Braves, Phil-KC A's) were 
    abysmal failures both on the field and at the gate. No way would the
    NL's 2 top franchises move.
    
    When the city realized O'Malley had them over the barrel it was too
    late. So the rest is history. Da Bums moved to LA to become corporate
    America's team, and one of the most successful at the cash register as
    well as on the field. Sure, you could say that it was his right to do
    whatever he wanted to with HIS team, but Brooklyn has never been the
    same since the Dodgers left.     
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.916 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 16:53 | 4 | 
|  |     Read a book called "The Dodgers Move West" by Sullivan.  The blame is
    equal on both O'Malley's and the city's part, if I remember right.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.917 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 09:20 | 42 | 
|  |     re .915
    
    Excellent not, Tom. However, I've got to think that John is right in
    that the city MUST share some of the blame. This situation at Ebbets
    Field was not much different than what existed in Cincy at Crosly
    Field, Boston with Fenway, Pittsburgh with Forbes Field and Chicago
    with Wrigly Field. Why didn't the Reds, Cubs, Pirates or Red Sox make
    the jump West? 
    
    O'Malley was still making money but he knew that the cost of baseball
    was rising. He was also in competition in New York for media $$ with
    the Giants and Yankees. Stoneham had no real complaints with the Polo
    Grounds - that place held nearly 15K more than Ebbets Field. O'Malley
    desperately tried to manuever to keep the Dodgers in Brooklyn. Of
    course there was some greed but I can't, in my heart, believe he
    conspired to move Da Bums for years prior to 1958. 
    
    I think O'Malley's big mistake was not going public on his dealings
    sooner. I firmly believe the good folks of Brooklyn would have agreed
    to fund a bond through taxes to build a replacement to Ebbets Field.
    
    New York's consolation prize to Giant and Dodger fans was to
    incorporate Dodger Blue and Giant Orange into the expansion Mets'
    uniforms.
    
    Bottom line is that the Dodgers move was the most complex of any
    franchise move in sports history. Clearly the Braves were a bust in
    Boston and the Browns were going nowhere in St. Louis. The Athletics
    were running second to the Phillies in Philadelphia. The only other
    possible move that even compares to the Dodgers move was the Braves
    move from Milwaukee. But there wasn't the tradition involved and the
    community roots weren't nearly as deep in Milwaukee was they were in
    Brooklyn.
    
    I have heard it reported that evebn today, Brooklyn lobbies for an
    expansion franchise. And Brooklyn continues a committe to void the move
    and move Da Bums back to their borough.
    
    BTW - How did the Dodgers get their name?
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.918 | Re-write history | SALES::THILL |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 10:03 | 43 | 
|  |     
    The Dodgers original name from the 1880s was the bridegrooms because
    several players ended up getting married in one year. Later they were 
    known as the "Trolley Dodgers" since apparently it was a major feat to 
    cross a street in those days. Eventually the name was shortened. 
    
    A lot of my previous note is from "Bums" (forget the author), and stories 
    from my father and uncles, etc. which is as objective as it can be :-)  
    Funny you should mention the Reds, Phillies, Pirates, etc. After the 
    Dodgers and Giants left and before expansion was official, NY groups tried 
    to lure one of those NL teams. Now that would have been just as much (if 
    not more) of an injustice to one of those cities. 
    
    True, the city's mistake was not realizing O'Malley wasn't bluffing
    when he was talking about moving. He suggested playing all the WS game
    at Yankee Stadium in 1956 because it was bigger, even if the Dodgers
    may have had a home park advantage at Ebbets Field. The Polo Grounds 
    was perhaps in a little better shape than Ebbets, since the Mets played
    there before Shea was built. Even though it held 55,000, there's no 
    question that it was also on it's way out. If you think sections 5-10 at
    Fenway are bad, most of the park was like that. Also, the PG was in the
    middle of Harlem at 155th st & 8th Ave. Granted, it was nothing like
    any inner city neighborhood is now, but you can imagine the anxiety
    that suburban Giants fans in the '50s had about leaving their cars parked 
    there for a night game. 
    
    TV was also becoming more the norm, and believe it or not, teams used
    to televise home games. Away games were more of a hassle because of the
    video technology. The videotape replay wasn't even invented until the
    early '60s. Spend money, drive in to the city, fight traffic, search for 
    a parking space, possibly get your car damaged/stolen or watch the
    game on TV...For a lot of folks it was a no-brainer.
    
    Branch Rickey was involved in a proposal to make the Pacific Caost
    League the 3rd major league. In a lot of ways it wasn't a bad idea,
    since most of those cities are in the majors now. There was also the
    Contenental League, which never got off the ground. Even still,
    O'Malley could have pulled a Calvin Griffith and got his team in LA,
    (names the Angels after the PCL team) but there would have been a "new" 
    Brooklyn Dodgers (the Mets in reality). The team would have been a lot
    more successful than any version of the Worshinen Senators.   
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.919 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 09 1992 10:10 | 47 | 
|  |     The Dodgers got their name from dodging the trolleys in Brooklyn and in
    fact were once called the Trolley Dodgers.  They had several other
    names (Superbas was one) but Dodgers was the one that really stuck.
    
    Brooklyn-born author Pete Hamill once called Walter O'Malley one of the
    3 most evil men in the history of the world, along with Adolf Hitler
    and someone else.  I once believed that too, until I read the book.
    
    Brooklyn was changing.  The park was hard to get to and that was the
    time of the mass exodus to the suburbs that made it necessary for a lot
    of the long-time Dodger fans to drive to the game.  On top of that - no
    parking.  Ebbets Field was small and hard to expand.  Clearly, a new
    stadium was needed.
    
    To hear the Dodger fans tell it, O'Malley pushed and pushed the city
    with more and more demands that the city couldn't meet.  To read the
    book, you learn that O'Malley's demands weren't all that heavy and the
    chance to build the stadium got hung up in a political power struggle. 
    Robert Moses, who was the person responsible for building most of the
    public works in the NYC area, was as much to blame as anyone.  O'Malley
    probably could have built the new facility because he paid for Dodger
    Stadium - but NYC would have had to have given him some land to do it.
    
    Part of what made O'Malley look so bad is that he got an incredible
    sweetheart deal from the City of Los Angeles.  He was essentially given
    the land that Dodger Stadium sits on - 100 or so prime acres in
    downtown Los Angeles isn't cheap now and wasn't cheap then.  A similar
    deal, though not as lucrative, was what lured the Giants west as well.
    
    I don't think NYC could have continued to support 3 teams for too much
    longer.  One of them would have had to have moved, probably the Giants. 
    Both teams had a lot in common - running down ballparks and slowly
    declining neighborhoods.  In the case of the Dodgers, it was also a
    hard-to-get-to ballpark.  The Polo Grounds was more run down than Ebbets
    Field.  Yankee Stadium was in good shape and the neighborhood hadn't really
    started its decline - Yankee and Football Giant players continued to
    live on the Grand Concourse in the Bronx until the mid-sixties.  The
    Giants also had the worst ownership and management of the three teams.
    
    It wasn't until New York City realized what it had lost and saw the
    need to build Shea Stadium that anything happened.  It was essentially
    driven by 1 man - William Shea - who had the vision to cut through the
    politics and get it done.  It's a shame he couldn't have done so 10
    years earlier because the Dodgers might still be in the NYC area - but
    probably not in Brooklyn.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.920 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 10:44 | 26 | 
|  |     All cities have changed. Yet a proud sports tradition and innovative
    owenership can act as a catalyst to bolster neighborhoods.
    
    Chicago is trying to revamp the South Side with the New Commisky Park.
    Baltimore's Camden Yards is part of an overall urban renewel scheme.
    
    There would have been land available in Brooklyn convenient for fans to
    access. Along the Belt Parkway, Van Wyke Expressway or near JFK
    airport. A new home for the Dodgers could have been used as a
    centerpiece for revitalization.
    
    As far as Shea goes, let's not lose sight of the fact that it was built
    during the scramble to get ready for the 1964 World's Fair. The entire
    area around it, in Flushing Meadows, was undergoing massive changes.
    The Grand Central Parkway, for example had lanes added, new ramps, etc.
    The stadium's construction coincided with the feverish plans to be
    ready for the fair. So, Mr Shea had a lot of red tape cut FOR him by
    Fair organizers.
    
    Ah, what might have been. Had the borough of Brooklyn, the city of New
    York and Walter O'Malley really worked together, perhaps the bums would
    still be there and I would have a New York team I could actually root
    for. 
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.921 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:07 | 13 | 
|  |     There are still occasional stories about out of towners being in
    Brooklyn and asking for directions to where Ebbets Field was and being
    told we do not talk about the Dodgers in this town anymore.
    
    No question that the Dodgers commanded a loyalty that the Giants never
    did. The Yankees were winning so their fan base was steady all along.
    If any one team would have had to have moved it would have been the
    Giants. In one sense it is good that when one left the other left.
    Somehow it is hard to imagine a real Dodgers/Giants rivalry if they
    played on opposite coasts.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.922 |  | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:16 | 8 | 
|  |     I read that when Carl Yastrzemski was thinking of joining pro
    while he was in college ( at ND no less!) his dad told him to look
    to the Red Sox that because with the Dodgers gone, the only team
    left that had that *certain* duende-type relationship with 
    the city and fans was the Bosox.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.923 | Baseball in CA was inevitable, and O'Malley seized the moment | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:16 | 12 | 
|  |         
    At the very least, as opposed to some of the other moves, the Dodgers
    have established their own very strong tradition in Los Angeles.  As
    much as the Dodgers may have been loved in Brooklyn, attendance at
    Ebbets was not off the scale even in the good years and in the down 
    periods was downright disappointing.  I guess depending on how you 
    look at it, O'Malley was a despicable wretch or a brilliant genius.  
    Make no mistake, though, from a business point of view, O'Malley and 
    the entire Dodger organization have had no equal...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.924 | RIP Fttzy! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:47 | 5 | 
|  | >    left that had that *certain* duende-type relationship with 
                                  ^^^^^^
      Another fan of Ray Fitzgerald!!? He was my all-time favorite sportswriter.
     I have his book, "Champions Remembered". Great stuff!
                                       Denny 8^)
 | 
| 3.925 | Gag! | SHALOT::MEDVID | it's just the way i smile, you said | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:49 | 9 | 
|  |     Fer crissakes!  You guys get on Bob Hunt (et. al.) for the endless
    Dean-o-rama rathole and then proceed to enter a billion notes about a
    team that has been gone for 35 years!  Makes the Wilt vs Russ debate
    look springtime fresh!
    
    Hey, it happened to New York and anything bad that happens to New York
    and New Yorkers makes the rest of the country smile.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.926 | :-) | SHALOT::HUNT | Ross Is My Hoss | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:59 | 4 | 
|  |  So whaddya'all think ???   Should Miller Huggins have pinch-hit for Tony
 Lazzeri in Game 7 of the '26 Series ???
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.927 |  | RUGBY1::way | Philosophize with him, Ted | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:00 | 24 | 
|  | Disagree Dan'l....
The Dodgers leaving Brooklyn was, IMO, one of the greatest sports tragedies.
Baseball in that era had a character, a fullness, a true Americana.  That
shows like "When It Was A Game" and books like "Shoeless Joe" are written
is a testament to that.
Boston/Fenway is probably one of the few teams that still retain that 
character, with their old park and stuff like that....
And besides, the Dodgers were a part of one of the most exciting baseball
moments ever:
	The Giants win the pennant, the Giants win the pennant, the Giants....
8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.928 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:20 | 6 | 
|  |     re: .926 was that game 6 or 7. I know it was the 8th inning.
    
    Now how was the last out of that series made??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.929 |  | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPV | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:20 | 8 | 
|  |     
    Mike,
    
    Yaz only *attended* Notre Dame to kill time.  When he got serious about
    his education, he earned his degree at Merrimack. 8^)
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.930 | HAHA 'Saw, THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:27 | 15 | 
|  |     Ah, Bob Hunt, .926,
    Tell ya after April 17. 8^)
    
    Denny,
    Actually even though I liked Ray Fitzgerald, LOVED George Frazier
    ( who made duende duende)
    
    Dickstah,
    Only took Yaz 10 yrs to get his MerryMac degree. He left ND 'cuz they
    asked him how to spell his name and he couldn't.  8^)
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.931 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:36 | 5 | 
|  |     	Hey MikeL, George Frazier was a mediocre relief pitcher for
    the New York Yankees who lost three games in the '81 World Series.
    How did he make duende duende?  8^)
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.932 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 14:51 | 34 | 
|  |     The Dodgers would have been a hit no matter where they went - or if
    they had stayed. Remember, when they started in LA they had Koufax and
    Drysdale, Snider and Reese, Gilliam and Alston. The team came with bona
    fide stars and was an immediate threat to the NL pennant. It was a
    contender in 1957 in Brooklyn. 
    
    It left a strong legacy: Jackie Robinson, Pete Reiser, Preacher Roe,
    Joe Black, Roy Campanella, Carl Furillo..........
    
    In the case of the Athletics, Browns and Braves, they were no threat
    when they first moved. 'Course the Braves were building but, in 1953
    they weren't a real threat.
    
    Imagine how bad those Brooklyn fans felt. They had suffered for decades
    and now they finally had a team that could contend year in and year
    out. Imagine how New York felt when 2/3 of the greatest CF'ers in
    history went west. 
    
    I agree with 'Saw. The move of the Dodgers is one of the biggest
    baseball stories ever. 
    
    And, Dan'l, I was born in NY and moved to Mass when I was 5. Have
    rooted against the Yankees, Giants, Mets, Jets, Nets, Rangers,
    Islanders, Knicks and St. Johns. I have always felt secretly good when
    NY teams do badly. But Brooklyn wuz different. It personified what
    could be good in baseball. The franchise had an innocense and an appeal
    that few others had.
    
    The Dodgers played in the first night game. They had Red Barber
    broadcasting games. They had the legacy of Larry McFail and Branch
    Rickey. Da Bums wuz an institution.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.933 | Can you believe this guy?! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 09 1992 15:07 | 9 | 
|  |     re: .932
    
    Traitor! You should be shot at dawn! The worst part is that you root
    for teams like the Celtics!
    
    only partial :-)
    
    The Crazy (ed) Met
    
 | 
| 3.934 | And you thought you were just joking, Bob... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 15:08 | 10 | 
|  |     
    > Now how was the last out of that series made??
    
    Babe Ruth, caught stealing at second.  I believe that Lazzeri's famous
    at-bat against G.C. "Pete" Alexander was in the same game, but an
    earlier inning than is usually reported in the re-telling of the 
    legend...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.935 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Apr 09 1992 15:12 | 9 | 
|  |     Bravo Glenn! Lazzeri's K was not in the 9th but in the 8th inning.
    
    Ruth singled with 2 outs in the 9th withy the Cards still up by 1 run.
    
    Lazzeri finally became one of the few players to hit a Grand Slam in
    the WS a few years later (I think 1928).
    
    The crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.936 | '60-'66 Sox sipped big-time | SALES::THILL |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 16:48 | 12 | 
|  |     Re Yaz's father telling him the Red Sox were the next closest thing to
    Da Bums... I dunno about this. There was a big thing in last Friday's
    paper about what a total LOSER orgnization the Red Sox had pre-1967. It
    was run by "drunkards and racists..." to quote the Globe. The amazing 
    thing about it is that one year turned the whole franchise around and 
    the Sox have been contenders almost every season since then.  
    
    They may have been the only game in town after the Braves left, but they
    weren't much to write home about, even WITH Ted Williams & Jackie
    Jensen. After they retired the team was even worse.
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.937 | One of the few times the Sox got the better of the Yanks | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Apr 09 1992 17:16 | 30 | 
|  | 
    > Re Yaz's father telling him the Red Sox were the next closest thing to
    > Da Bums... I dunno about this. There was a big thing in last Friday's
    > paper about what a total LOSER orgnization the Red Sox had pre-1967. It
    > was run by "drunkards and racists..." to quote the Globe. The amazing 
    > thing about it is that one year turned the whole franchise around and 
    > the Sox have been contenders almost every season since then.  
    
    Lest anyone think that Yaz joined the Red Sox simply because he was
    overwhelmed by the Yawkey tradition, don't forget that a certain matter
    of $100,000 had something to do with it.  Yaz was a bigtime bonus baby,
    and only the Yankees and the free-spending Yawkey were in the bidding.
    I've heard another story where the Yankee scout came to the Yaz
    household and Carl Sr. wrote the magic six-digit figure on an envelope 
    and slid it across the table.  The scout said that it was way too much 
    and the Yankees wouldn't pay it, that wasn't the Yankee way, that young 
    Carl should just be proud to play with the mighty pinstripers, etc., 
    and then got up to leave.  Yaz' dad responded that if the scout left 
    the house now his son would never play for the Yankees.  The scout left 
    but later on relented, but Carl Sr. kept his word.
    
    The moral to all of this: Yaz' dad tells a lot of stories, apparently...
    
    Seriously, though, the Red Sox really weren't in that bad a shape until
    around the time Williams retired, and that was after Yaz signed on. 
    They weren't perennial contenders, but they were generally a winning
    team with a strong fan following.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.938 | made for good copy anyway. | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 13 1992 09:43 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.939 | Return to Tradition | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Mon Apr 13 1992 09:45 | 18 | 
|  |     Saw some of the Cubs/Cardinals game on Saturday. Noticed that the
    Cardinals are using the blue caps that they used back in the 60's and
    50's. Since I saw their first game at home where they wore red caps,
    this must be their special road stuff.
    
    Lesse, the Red Sox got rid of their ridiculous pullover tops and went
    back to the traditional uniform around 1980, the Phillies have their
    old uniforms back. The Cubs went back to the style they had in the 50's
    (for the most part), The Cardinals are wearing the style they used on
    the road from years ago, Camden Yards is a beautiful baseball park,
    plans are for another asymetrical park being built for the Texas
    Rangers.........Will the next change be sleeveless tops for the Pirates
    and going back mto calling the Reds the Redlegs?
    
    Ah, tradition, I love it.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.940 |  | LUNER::BROOKS | RIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992 | Mon Apr 13 1992 10:06 | 6 | 
|  |     Well, the A's like to be officially known as the Athletics (note that
    is on their home jerseys), so the Reds might do it. I'd love to see the
    sleeveless jersey come back (I bet the players will love it in July
    when they play the Cards !) - but I hope we don't see everyone go
    generic on us ... all white and gray and pinstripe, as has been the
    trend lately.
 | 
| 3.941 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Thought I lobster, but now I flounder... | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:49 | 3 | 
|  |     Bring back Houston's mustard and catchup striped uni's!!!z
    
    
 | 
| 3.942 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:22 | 27 | 
|  |     Nah, the days of softball unis in the majors is over. The White Sox are
    now in respectable uniforms. So are the Padres. 
    
    Now we have to work on getting the Reds, Pirates, Indians and Athletics
    into the sleeveless tops.
    
    And getting the Giants to have "GIANTS" written in block letters across
    the front.
    
    And getting the Mets to have "NEW YORK written in block letters across
    the front of the road uniforms and, also, doing away with the verticle
    stripes going down the sides of their uniforms.
    
    Doing something with the Orioles. The hats are now OK but the home
    jerseys still look like someone couldn't make up their mind - sort of
    like the White Sox unis of 3 years ago.
    
    Getting the Tigers to wear belts on their away uniforms.
    
    Doing away with the Royals blue away colors.
    
    Can anything be done for the Expos hats?
    
    Getting the Brewers to do something about their silly logo.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.943 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:26 | 3 | 
|  |        Baseball won't be baseball until they at least do away with
    phony-turf!
                                       Denny
 | 
| 3.944 | re:.943 - agreed, but add in | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:28 | 5 | 
|  |     And it also won;t be baseball until they get rid of the DH aka the
    Designated Gimmick.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.945 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:34 | 3 | 
|  |        You're right Craze, but it still ain't as bad as playin' on a pool
    table!
                                    Denny
 | 
| 3.946 | Expos old logo was clever but dumb | SHALOT::MEDVID | New Dream Date Log | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:37 | 5 | 
|  |     What's wrong with the Expos hats?  You do realize they changed them
    this year, don't you.  Dark blue with a dark red M.  Pretty nice.  In
    fact, the whole uniform changed and looks a lot better.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.947 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:40 | 3 | 
|  |        What was the name of the team in Montreal before 'Expos'? I can't
    remember, this isn't a trick question.
                                       Denny
 | 
| 3.948 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:41 | 5 | 
|  |     Montreal Royals, farm team of the Brooklyn Dodgers.  Jackie Robinson
    and Roy Campanella played there, after playing for Walter Alston at
    their Nashua, NH farm team.
    
    Ninj
 | 
| 3.949 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:42 | 12 | 
|  |  I believe the Expos kept the same bleu, blanc et rouge "M" symbol but got
 rid of the tri-color hats in favor of solid dark blue.
 
 I like all the uniform changes so far.  It does take an extra split
 second, however, to mentally identify some of the teams when you first see
 them.  
 
 The Expos, in particular.  They were so distinctive before but now you
 have to focus in a little tighter to make sure that's who they are.  Expos
 and Mets road uniforms look awfully alike at first glance.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.950 | I'd like to find a Pads home jersey from 84 ... | LUNER::BROOKS | Your mother's an astronaunt ... | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:44 | 3 | 
|  |     The old Pads uniforms were fine. Changing them to blue and orange to
    run with the Jones' was a big cop-op ... and they stink. I hope they go
    back to the old colors. I liked the A's green and gold from the 70's.
 | 
| 3.951 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:46 | 9 | 
|  |     Dan'l, haven't seen the Expo unis this year. If they deep 6'd the
    multi-color hat, I think it's an improvement.
    
    Speaking of the Expos, have they fixed Olympic Stadium? Remember last
    year they had to play a bunch of home games in September away because
    of falling chunks of concrete?
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.952 | All kinda confused this April | SHALOT::MEDVID | New Dream Date Log | Tue Apr 14 1992 09:13 | 6 | 
|  |     I do stand corrected.  The Expos did go to a dark blue hat but they
    left the multi-colored ensignia.  The biggest change so far...as far as
    sitting watching a game and saying "who the hell is that"...are the
    Cards who are wearing dark blue batting helmets.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.953 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 09:30 | 75 | 
|  |     I had a chance to reread _The Dodgers Move West_ over the last couple
    of days.  If this is a subject you're at all interested in approaching
    objectively, then this is the book to read.  Do not try to get a
    balanced viewpoint from _The Boys of Summer_, _Bums_ or any other book
    about the period since those are 100% from the fan viewpoint and cast
    Walter O'Malley as 100% evil.  He wasn't.  If they want to blame any
    one person, blame Robert Moses.
    
    A lot of the information I mentioned in previous notes is accurate. 
    Attendance at Ebbets Field wasn't great but the Dodgers were still very
    profitable.  Access and parking were big problems, along with the fact
    that Ebbets Field was small and there was no room for expansion.  The
    neighborhood was in a slow state of decline and while a rough crowd to
    begin with, things were getting worse with more blacks at the ballpark. 
    According to observers, the black fan loyalty was to Jackie Robinson
    and not to the team, and this tension combined with the crowded
    conditions of a full house at Ebbets Field made for a potentially
    explosive atmosphere.
    
    After O'Malley took over the Dodgers from Branch Rickey, he saw the
    replacement of Ebbets Field as the top priority of the ballclub.  One
    of the things motiviating him to do so was the move to Milwaukee of the
    Braves, who drew 2,000,000 their first year.  O'Malley was quite
    concerned about whether or not the Dodgers could remain competitive. 
    This concern deepened as the fifties rolled along and the Boys of
    Summer began to age.
    
    O'Malley wanted to build the ballpark himself but needed the city to
    take a plot of land in order for him to do so.  He wanted the land to
    be at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and Flatbush Avenue in
    Brooklyn, where the Long Island RR terminal was.  He had a scheme that
    a new stadium and a rebuilt railroad station could revitalize the area. 
    Here's where Moses came in.  He was opposed to railroads because he's
    the man who was responsible for the highway network around New York,
    and he wanted people to drive the highways he built and pay the tolls. 
    He was opposed to spectator sports because he believed in active
    recreation.  O'Malley wanted the land condemned for municipal use under
    a broad interpretation of a local statute.  Moses hung to the narrow
    interpretation of the statute, though he wasn't above interpreting it
    broadly when it served his purposes.
    
    Moses did the usual political maneuvering - study committees, the whole
    bit - in order to delay the proposal and frustrate the opposition.  In
    the meantime, New York City had to appropriate the money to do this
    work and approve the project as it slowly moved forward.  Brooklyn,
    although the largest borough in NYC at the time, was relatively
    powerless because while it had a majority of the votes on the
    equivalent of the City Council, was looked upon as a minor part of the
    city.  So, no one was really interested in helping Brooklyn out.
    
    These reasons, moreso than Walter O'Malley, are the reasons the Dodgers
    moved out.  Los Angeles saw this and approached him.  They took the
    land at Chavez Ravine and packaged it up for him.  O'Malley sold Ebbets
    Field and leased it back, had the Dodgers play some games in Roosevelt
    Stadium in Jersey City and gave New York City every chance to make a
    deal with him.  They wouldn't.  In fairness, about the time of the move
    West, the idea for Shea Stadium came about (Moses backed this one
    because not only would it be publicly financed but would be the
    centerpiece of the big park he hoped to build at Flushing Meadow) but
    O'Malley by then was committed to either keeping the Dodgers in
    Brooklyn or moving them west to Los Angeles.
    
    Even the move to Los Angeles was dicey because there were several court
    suits challenging the validity of the deal with the Dodgers and it
    actually went to a public referendum that passed by a very narrow
    margin.  O'Malley really gambled with the move to Los Angeles, moreso
    than Horace Stoneham did with the Giants move to San Francisco - it's
    hard to believe now, to look at Candlestick Park and the rejections of
    the new stadium in San Francisco, but San Francisco wanted the Giants
    more overall than Los Angeles wanted the Dodgers and made it very easy
    for the Giants to move there.  It was really a struggle for the Dodgers
    to get the land and get established - if that had fallen through, who
    knows what would have happened?
    
    John
 | 
| 3.954 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 10:06 | 5 | 
|  |     John, thanks so much for that note. I'm going to the library tonight to
    get the book.
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.955 | Book? | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Tue Apr 14 1992 11:07 | 14 | 
|  |     Rich,
    
    You may want to re-think that decision.
    
    
    
    I've heard there are no pictures in the book!
    
    many ;^)
    
    I remain,
    Zinggggggg,
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.956 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 11:10 | 6 | 
|  |     What, no pictures????
    
    I don't need no steeeeenking pictures!!!!!
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.957 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 11:28 | 53 | 
|  |     Kev, there are pictures in the book.
    
    A few other notes about the move - New York based its decision to not
    help the Dodgers and Los Angeles based its decision to help the Dodgers
    on differing interpretations of the same law - namely, is helping a
    sports franchise in the public interest or not.  New York felt not, Los
    Angeles thought it did.  Even at that, the original City Council
    decision in Los Angeles was overturned by the Superior Court but then
    upheld in both the California Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court.
    
    As I finished the book, it became clearer that what O'Malley really
    needed was government help in acquiring the land.  If the government
    takes land by eminent domain, they pay the owners fair market value. 
    If an entrepreneur wants to buy land it becomes more and more expensive
    to do so (which is why Disney's move to Florida was kept secret for so
    long and why the Red Sox, if they are putting together a parcel of land
    as I suspect they are, are doing so quietly).  New York wasn't willing
    to do that for two reasons - O'Malley wanted to own the facility and
    land outright where New York would have preferred a landlord-tenant
    relationship, and the Dodgers were seen as a purely Brooklyn franchise
    that weren't identified as New York City-wide (unlike the Yankees and
    to a lesser extent, the Giants) so the O'Malley proposal was seen as
    benefitting only O'Malley and Brooklyn.  Well, it did benefit O'Malley
    but that's business - the loss of the Dodgers probably cost Brooklyn
    more than O'Malley would have made.
    
    O'Malley also didn't play New York vs Los Angeles in an attempt to get
    the best deal he could, despite the deep held thoughts and emotions of
    those from Brooklyn.  He didn't pursue Los Angeles - Los Angeles came
    to him.  They took the land under eminent domain and he bought it for
    less than he would have to if he'd done it himself, they helped with
    the access but even at that there were lots of obstacles.
    
    The book concludes that the move was justified.  Ebbets Field was going
    to have to be abandoned sooner or later and had Shea Stadium been a
    couple of years further ahead, either the Dodgers or Giants would have
    ended up there, with no team in Brooklyn in either case since building
    a new ballpark in Brooklyn just wasn't going to happen.  From a civic
    viewpoint it was justified - it was just impossible then and even more
    impossible now for a sports facility to be built without any government
    help whatsoever - be it tax breaks, access, help in assembling the
    land, whatever.  New York didn't see the Giants and Dodgers (and since
    then, the football Giants and Jets) as civic assets - Los Angeles and
    San Francisco did.  A city has no right to complain about the loss of a
    team as a civic asset unless it's willing to put its money where its
    mouth is.
    
    The Dodgers were the foundation of the Brooklyn community and that can
    never be forgiven by the folks in Brooklyn, nor can the reasons behind
    the move be justified in any way for any reason, no matter how right
    the move was.  This passion blurs the real issues.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.958 | Case in point ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Tue Apr 14 1992 11:58 | 15 | 
|  | � A city has no right to complain about the loss of a team as a civic asset 
� unless it's willing to put its money where its mouth is.
This philosophy is absolutely *CRITICAL* to understanding why some cities 
lose teams and why some don't.   
As dead busted broke as Philadelphia is, they still have found the means 
(somehow) to keep the Eagles from flying to Phoenix and the Flyers and Sixers 
from hopping over the bridge to Camden.   Philly teams are considered 
priceless civic assets and the city fathers spare no expense in keeping them.
For what it's worth ...
Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.959 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 12:03 | 15 | 
|  |     And that's why I fully expect to see the Patriots somewhere other than
    around here at some point in the future.  Boston and Massachusetts
    politicians don't have the vision to see what a place like the
    Metrodome has done for Minneapolis, and worry more about who's going to
    benefit from building such a facility (ie, who's going to get the cushy
    no-show job).
    
    Unlike a civic asset such as a museum, a sports franchise has the
    freedom to move.  Unlike the arts, which are made up of lots of small
    businesses (theatre groups, dance companies and so forth), their
    economic impact is felt in the aggregate and the loss of one or two
    groups doesn't have a big impact.  The loss of a sports team has a big,
    big impact.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.960 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Tue Apr 14 1992 13:03 | 4 | 
|  |     	Thanks JohnH.  It was really Moses who led the Dodgers to the
    promised land.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.961 |  | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:00 | 12 | 
|  |     You are sadly correct, John, on your assesment of the Patriots' chances
    of staying in Massachusetts. Look how the city has treated attempts for
    a new Boston Garden? They haven't got a clue what a state of the art
    25,000 seat facility could mean to the metro area. 
    
    We hear hacks tell us, "Why should the taxpayer shell out dough for
    sports teams?" They are too short-sighted to realize that they could
    reap millions in revenue from activities that avoid Boston like the
    plague now because of a lack of a decent arena.
    
    Rich
     
 | 
| 3.962 | I doubt Boston will ever learn | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:04 | 14 | 
|  |     re: .961
    
    The folks who run the Worcester Centrum sure aren't complaining about
    the lousy shape Boston Garden is in. Lets see, Springsteen only played
    the Centrum last time. U2 played both this time but only the Centrum
    last tour, and on and on. Unless a new Boston Garden is built they can
    forget about getting acts like the Stones,Springsteen, NCAA Regionals,
    etc on a regular basis. Madison Square Garden redid a whole portion of
    their space within the last year. The new Paramount (?) Theatre section
    looks real good and is a great venue for smaller event with the Main
    arena a great place for larger indoor events.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.963 | What about Fenway? | RDOVAX::BRAKE |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:13 | 6 | 
|  |     And what is the city doing (or the Red Sox) about the inevitable? We
    all know Fenway's days are numbered. Are there any plans for a
    replacement? Locations discussed?
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.964 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:26 | 30 | 
|  |     In the city's defense, they did help the owners of Boston Garden work
    out a land swap with the Massachusetts General Hospital to assemble the
    parcel of land needed.  They may or may not be giving the owners of the
    Garden tax breaks to develop the land.
    
    In the state's defense, they worked with the developers of the land to
    enable the building to be built on top of a rebuilt MBTA subway and
    train station.  There will also be a parking garage incorporated in.
    
    Neither the state or city was willing/able to use borrowing power to
    get low cost, low interest state or municipal bonds to help the owners
    with financing.  I believe the owners of the Garden will be willing to
    be fully liable for the bonds if the state/city will finance them.  The
    owners are now off pursuing various alternatives for the financing -
    the sale of luxury boxes and talking to Japanese banks about it.
    
    The worst thing the city did was delay in naming the owners of the
    Garden as developers for the project, which would have originally
    included office space and hotels.  Since it was first proposed, the
    real estate market collapsed and made this part of the project
    unfeasible.  The new Garden, if built, will be the only thing built. 
    There will 8 feet between the old building and new building - the lot
    is that tight.
    
    Other than naming a study commission, nothing is happening with
    anything to do with a facility for the Red Sox or Patriots.  A new
    facility for the Patriots is only really feasible if the Red Sox go in
    with them.  The Red Sox will only move if and when they have to.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.965 | Will I be able to get good Celts' tix in the New Garden? Not. | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:26 | 28 | 
|  | 
    On the other hand, I think there's a real problem in this country (and
    maybe Canada, too, as witnessed by the bankrupted Skydome) with sports 
    owners holding out their hands and demanding what amounts to blackmail 
    payments to keep their teams in certain communities.  Once upon a time, 
    while owners might have gotten a good deal on land or certain zoning 
    exceptions to get started, they financed, built, and ran and their own 
    stadiums and generally operated their franchises as private businesses
    without outside intervention.  Now, it's almost a contest to see which 
    communities can show the most "foresight" by gouging their taxpaying 
    constituents the most without evoking a negative response.
    
    I don't see the point to it.  Cities compete against other cities with
    tax dollars for the rights to charge ludicrous luxury box fees and
    increasingly high prices for increasingly scarce tickets (with most
    decent tickets going to more affluent season-ticket holders).  All of
    this supposedly benefits the city by bringing in business and therefore
    more tax revenues, but is it enough to offset the franchise and stadium
    subsidies?  I suspect that these ecomonic benefits to the community are
    greatly exaggerated by the sports moguls and their partners in
    government (and have seen studies cited that say as much, the last time 
    being when the Raiders almost succeeded in hijacking the decaying city 
    of Oakland of a scandalous ransom a couple of years ago), and that the
    benefits go to the very few as opposed to being well-distributed
    amongst the taxpayers...
    
    glenn
       
 | 
| 3.966 | Left horn or right ??? | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:36 | 12 | 
|  | Classic definition of a dilemma, isn't it ???   
A city can slash its economic wrists and keep the spoiled brat team or it can 
let it go and risk all kinds of scorn and ridicule ... not to mention voter 
anger in the next election.
Ultimately, you can begin to make a case for publicly-held sports teams a la 
the Green Bay Packers.   Make 'em each do an IPO on the Big Board, sell gobs 
of shares and then appoint some business management types who answer directly 
to the stockholders through a Board of Directors.
Bob Hunt 
 | 
| 3.967 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:42 | 6 | 
|  | �    We hear hacks tell us, "Why should the taxpayer shell out dough for
�    sports teams?" 
    
    I think we're hearing it more from the taxpayes than the hacks, Rich. 
    You know the old story (I've seen you in ::MASSACHUSETTS), nobody can
    afford to pay more taxes.
 | 
| 3.968 | Walter O'Malley = Mother Theresa.  NOT | SALES::THILL |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:54 | 28 | 
|  |     Interesting, objective note a while back about the Dodgers, Ninj. Passion 
    aside, answers are never as simple as they appear.  
    
    Don't forget that the area where Dodger Stadium now sits was a primarily 
    Hispanic barrio. The city siezed th land by eminent domain, and basically 
    tore down a neighborhood that was perhaps like the old West End in Boston 
    - a "blighted" area to some, but home to others. Of course in those days
    urban community groups - especially minority groups - didn't have the
    grass roots organization to do anything about it. 
    
    The Dodgers played in the LA Coleseum from 1958 to 1961, with Dodger
    Stadium opening in April 1962. The AL's LA Angels played in Wrigley 
    Field home field of the Cubs' PCL farm team by the same name. For a
    while they even played there after Dodger Stadium was open, but later
    moved in as tennants. Now before everyone starts gushing over what a
    wonderful humanitarian Walter O'Malley is, note that the Dodgers were
    charging the Angels for field maintenance when the Angels were on the
    road (and the Dodgers were home). The Dodgers also got ALL the parking 
    and concessions form Angels home games, sorta like the lease the Jets had 
    with the Mets at Shea before they moved to NJ. When the Angels complained, 
    O'Malley told them that, like someone who travels a lot on the job, you 
    still have to pay your whole month's rent/mortgage whether you are there 
    or not. That, combined with a growing suburban population and Disneyland 
    opening, made it all the more reason for the Angels to move when Aneheim 
    Stadium was built in 1965 or so.   
    
    Tom
    
 | 
| 3.969 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 14:58 | 37 | 
|  |     The taxpayer should shell out money to help the teams if they see the
    teams as civic assets and recognize the economic benefits they bring to
    an area.  I'll bet a lot of Minnesotans saw the Metrodome as a white
    elephant until they saw all the benefits hosting the Super Bowl and
    Final Four brought to them.  And this doesn't even include the NCAA
    hockey tournament (which wasn't played at the Dome), the Stanley Cup
    finals (ditto) and the World Series (which wasn't planned but which
    just sort of happened).  If it can be sold on that basis, then it will
    work.
    
    Players have become their own worst enemies with their huge salaries. 
    Teams have become their own worst enemies by some of their unreasonable
    demands.  But, if the team will approach the governments looking to
    form a true partnership (as I believe the Patriots are doing) and
    selling the benefits of the collaboration, without making unreasonable
    demands, then it can fly.  This situation as Bob and Glenn referred to
    doesn't give a team the right to play hardball and play one city
    against another to get the Taj Mahal built.
    
    In this state, to give you an example of what I think will happen,
    consider the Mass Convention Center Authority.  This was formed as an
    umbrella over the Hynes Auditorium at the Prudential Center and the
    Boston Common Garage - both owned by the city, both losing tons of
    money.  It was made a state agency but a condition of making it a state
    agency was to give Fran Joyce, longtime aide to Senate President
    Bulger, a lifetime appointment as director.  Well, these are state
    agencies but there are lots of politicians who are either jealous of
    Joyce, angry at Bulger (who runs the State Senate with an iron hand) or
    both; who oppose any help given to the MCCA because of the
    personalities involved.  That's the sort of parochial mindset here in
    Massachusetts that will prevent a creative project like a Metrodome
    from ever happening.  It's a shame because the MCCA, with the right
    resources, can be run well and be a real money-maker for the State.  A
    stadium could do the same thing.
    
    John
                                               
 | 
| 3.970 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Apr 14 1992 15:07 | 27 | 
|  |     Tom,
    
    Actually, the land had previously been seized (well, most of it) by
    eminent domain for a public housing project.  Then, there was something
    that stopped the public housing from being built - and in fact it could
    not be used for public housing for a 30 year period.  The land was
    essentially going to sit idle unless it was put to some other project
    for the public benefit.  The whole legal question hinged on whether or
    not selling it to the Dodgers for a baseball stadium was for the public
    benefit or not.  New York didn't see it that way, Los Angeles did and
    it was upheld in court.
    
    The city, however, got a lot of bad publicity for evicting the last few
    folks living on that land.  Also, they walked away from condemning the
    last few parcels of land so O'Malley had to deal directly with the
    owners, and paid an exceptionally high price for the parcels.  One of
    these parcels was in the middle of the entrance of the parking lot.
    
    O'Malley was no Mother Theresa, that's for sure.  He was a smart
    businessman who bet on taking a big risk and won big.  The point of the
    book is to show that while Brooklynites may have been justified in
    their anger over the Dodgers leaving, their anger was misplaced - they
    should have been angry at Robert Moses, Mayor Robert Wagner, the rest
    of the New York City Government, the borough of Brooklyn and Borough
    President Abe Stark.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.971 |  | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE |  | Tue Apr 14 1992 16:00 | 27 | 
|  |     I can't understand HOW the Celtics, Bruins and Red Sox are nopt
    considered civic assets to the people of Boston. Yet my years of living
    in Mass saw nothing but obstacles being thrown into the path of any
    plan for a new Garden. While modern hotels went up like weeds in the
    '80's, I had to wonder: Who will be occupying all these rooms?
    
    John brings up an excellent example with the Metrodome. Cases can also
    be made for the Hoosier dome. NOT THAT A DOME IS THE ANSWER!!! But a
    modern facility can have a myriad of uses.
    
    Oriole Park at camden Yards cost the Orioles $1.7M to build. I have no
    idea what kind of deal the team made with the city of Baltimore but
    that seems like small potatoes when I consider player salaries.
    Admittedly, Oriole Park is a one sport arena and has limited uses but
    it's success bodes promising for future Red Sox plans.
    
    Bob Hunt also alluded to efforts by Philadelphia. Creative,
    well-thought out plans and a spirit of partnership between teams and
    city are alive in their efforts. This new arena will be able to offer a
    site for major conventions, concerts, ice shows and enough activity to
    keep it busy 75% of the year. Considering the money people spend when
    they attend events in arenas, there is a chance for a bonanza. But, as
    Mac states, plans have to be honest and Massachusetts has a track
    record lately of creating bottomless pits for taxpayer money. 
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.972 |  | LUNER::BROOKS | I'll put my mouth where the money is! | Tue Apr 14 1992 16:24 | 12 | 
|  |     re Glenn W
    
    (Applause !!!!!)
    
    Very well put. Which made it all the sweeter when the city of Oakland
    told Al Davis to take his demands and stick 'em when the sun didn't
    shine. And Mayor Lionel Wilson almost got hooted out of town for
    falling for the blackmail.
    
    One would hope that other cities will wake up and smell the coffee.
    
    Doc
 | 
| 3.973 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Tue Apr 14 1992 16:29 | 10 | 
|  |  �   One would hope that other cities will wake up and smell the coffee.
 
 You mean ... like Oakland which wants another team back and is in the NFL
 expansion hunt to try and get it, right ???
 
 The Raid-Uhs were an Oakland civic asset but they were (still are)
 privately owned.  Bingo ... instant business conflict.  Davis named his
 price, the city balked and Big Al walked.  Tis the 'Merican way.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.974 |  | LUNER::BROOKS | I'll put my mouth where the money is! | Tue Apr 14 1992 16:43 | 6 | 
|  |     Yeah Bob, but Al tried to 'greenmail' Oakland like he did Irwindale
    (talk about stupid), and Wilson was ready to bite. Fortunately, the
    people woke up and stopped the madness.
    
    I think an expansion team will come cheaper for the city than getting
    the Raiders back would have.
 | 
| 3.975 | Philadelphia Story? | SALES::THILL |  | Wed Apr 15 1992 11:12 | 19 | 
|  |     Bob Hunt, maybe you can explain something about the Philadelphia
    situation. From what I heard, the Eagles' Leonard Tose threatened a
    move to Phoenix unless the city re-negotiated his lease at the Vet in
    a much more favorable way. The city gave in, so he stayed. I heard
    rumblings about someone building a new arena across the river in Camden
    NJ for the Flyers and Sixers. Did the city agree to replace the
    Spectrum? The Spectrum isn't that old (25 years?) so it's not as if it
    was the Boston Garden or Chicago Stadium. Is the "problem" with the
    spectrum that it doesn't have enough Luxury boxes?  It seems
    renovations could be done to add them a lot easier and cheaper than
    building a new arena. 
    
    I guess what gets me is owners taking advantage of the popular
    sentiment. If whoever the pols responsible for letting the Eagles go had 
    let them, they might as well forget about re-election. Tose knew this
    and held the gun to the city. Sure, sports teams do mean a lot to a
    community, but where do you draw the line?
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.976 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Wed Apr 15 1992 11:50 | 42 | 
|  |  � From what I heard, the Eagles' Leonard Tose threatened a move to Phoenix
 � unless the city re-negotiated his lease at the Vet in a much more
 � favorable way. The city gave in, so he stayed. 
 
 Leonard Tose was in personal hock big time back in 1984.  Ol' Leonard
 loved the Atlantic City casinos and they loved him right back.  Phoenix
 was making all kinds of sweetheart noises to get Tose to move the Iggles
 out west and it was major panic time in Philly.   The city caved in and
 spent millions to construct 100 or so new luxury boxes around the upper
 rim of The Vet.  The Iggles get just about all the revenue from them.  
 Tose sold the team to Norman Braman in 1985 ... and paid off the casinos.
 
 � I heard rumblings about someone building a new arena across the river in
 � Camden NJ for the Flyers and Sixers. Did the city agree to replace the
 � Spectrum? The Spectrum isn't that old (25 years?) so it's not as if it was
 � the Boston Garden or Chicago Stadium. Is the "problem" with the spectrum
 � that it doesn't have enough Luxury boxes?  
 
 Harold Katz, owner of the Sixers, has one of the worst arena leasing
 arrangements in all of sports.  The Snider family (Flyers' owners) own the
 Spectrum and rake Harold over the coals annually.   Camden, NJ did the
 sweethearts dance this time and Harold was all set to pack up and move
 across the Walt Whitman Bridge.   
 
 The city panicked again (sorta) and the Sniders and Harold together then
 arm-twisted the city into condemning the JFK Stadium facility and building
 a new Spectrum replacement where both teams will play as usual ... only
 this time with luxury boxes that Harold can count some cash from.   The
 lack of boxes in the current Spectrum was Harold's most public complaint.
    
 � If whoever the pols responsible for letting the Eagles go had let them,
 � they might as well forget about re-election.
 
 Wilson Goode was mayor during all this.    Keep in mind that Wilson was
 the clever fellow who ordered a SWAT team to drop a satchel full of C-4 on
 top of the radical group MOVE's house in West Philly in 1985.  The house
 and three other full city blocks were leveled in the firestorm.  11 people
 died ... and Wilson got re-elected anyway to a second term two years later.
 
 If he had let the Iggles go, he might have gotten himself shot.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.977 | Say Walt ? Remember : "The roof ... the roof is on ire ..." | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'll put my mouth where the money is! | Wed Apr 15 1992 14:37 | 9 | 
|  |     Bob, stop exaggerating ! The C-4 was an 'entry device' !
    
    Distortionist !
    
    
              
    :-)
    
    Doc
 | 
| 3.978 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Apr 16 1992 12:13 | 7 | 
|  |     Rich, the politicians in the Boston area look at the sports teams as
    civic assets to be milked for their own benefit:  "Give me four
    tickets."  "Give my idiot cousin a job."  "Buy beer from my brother's
    distributorship."  That kind of civic asset they understand perfectly
    well.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.979 | Right on the Nose, John | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE |  | Thu Apr 16 1992 13:26 | 6 | 
|  |     yeah, John, I hear you. 
    
    Get ya Bulger Beah Heah!
    
    Rich
    
 | 
| 3.980 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | A Plotcher, hard luck Your Lordship | Thu Apr 16 1992 15:47 | 9 | 
|  |     
    civic assets to be milked for their own benefit:  "Give me four
    tickets."                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ^^^^^^^^^
    
    Or Vouchers, maybe???????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.981 | Not enough balls | SHALOT::MEDVID | Who's got segmented eyes? | Mon May 04 1992 13:26 | 14 | 
|  |     Pam Postema, the only female ump in the majors, has a book out called
    "You Have To Have Balls To Make It In This League."  It details her 13
    years as an ump and how she never was able to make it to the majors,
    supposedly because of her sex.
    
    I saw Postema ump her first major league game in Kissimmee, Florida
    back in '88.  It was a spring training game between the Pirates and the
    Astros.  It became a famous game not only because it was the first one
    ever umped by a female, but also because of what Bob Knepper said after
    the game: women are "in a role of submission to men."
    
    She was fired a month after her strongest advocate Bart Giamatti died.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.982 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Networkin' the USA '92 Tour | Mon May 04 1992 21:42 | 5 | 
|  |     I heard her on a Philly radio station last week, and she pretty much
    made a fool of herself. She was asked about her chapter about the
    current Phils 3rd base coach, Larry Bowa. She really piled it on him.
    They then had Bowa come on the line, refuting most of what she said.
    Pretty weak...... 
 | 
| 3.983 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | The roof�, the roof is on fire... | Mon May 04 1992 22:40 | 2 | 
|  |     Kirk Gibson has been released...
    
 | 
| 3.984 | Sooooooooweeeeeeee!!! | SHALOT::MEDVID | i can't lick that far | Fri May 08 1992 10:31 | 5 | 
|  |     Three women are suing Daryl Strawberry for a few million each in a
    slander case.  They claim Strawberry said they were "pigs."
    
    	--dan'l
    
 | 
| 3.985 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed May 27 1992 17:15 | 5 | 
|  |     Giants over Cubs this afternoon 6-2...Mike Felder's bases loaded triple
    in the 9th the big blow.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.986 | Dumb Fans | SHALOT::MEDVID | the strain of smiling | Wed Jun 24 1992 09:29 | 5 | 
|  |     Barry Bonds and Tony Gwynn lead the All-Star voting for the NL
    outfield.  1992 no-stars Bonilla and Strawberry are in line for the
    third position.  
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.987 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Jun 24 1992 09:47 | 11 | 
|  | Dan'l -
While Bonilla isn't have a super season, he does have 41 ribbys.  Despite
criticisms, he'll drive in over 100 runs again this year.  He's consistent,
that's for sure.
I don't think he should start,  but he's a better pick than Darryl...
JD
 | 
| 3.988 | What did he say about Hohn's mother anyway | SHALOT::MEDVID | Save a baboon, donate YOUR liver | Mon Jul 06 1992 14:44 | 11 | 
|  |     In Atlanta yesterday, the homeplate ump tossed Terry Pendleton and then
    Bobby Cox.  Then he proceeded to get a member of security, point out a
    guy in the stands, and have him kicked out.  Now, I've seen ushers and
    security oust fans for infractions, but I've never seen an ump go out
    of his way to pinpoint someone and get him thrown out.
    
    Anyone know what the guy did to warrant such punishment?  I can see it
    being consistent with league rules if he interfered with play, but
    other than that...
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.989 | Sizzling hot !!! | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Mon Jul 06 1992 15:26 | 14 | 
|  | That home plate ump in Hotlanta simply lost it.  It was over 120� in 
Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium yesterday.
I'll bet his long johns were giving him a major league wedgie and he was 
probably also pissed that they didn't have any iced tea in the umps' 
clubhouse before the game.  
A little ball-strike lip from Pendleton and boom ... he went thermonuke.
I'm sure that Terry, Cox, and that fan were just concerned about him, that's 
all.  They probably asked him some questions about his mom's heritage but, in 
his overheated state, he just blew a gasket big time.
Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.990 | roolling!! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Jul 06 1992 15:31 | 3 | 
|  |     
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.991 | WGN gets more late night games, TBS less | SHALOT::MEDVID | Save a baboon, donate YOUR liver | Mon Jul 06 1992 18:32 | 10 | 
|  |     Had to stop eating dinner and enter what I just heard on the local
    news:
    
    Starting next season, the Reds and Braves move to the NL East and the
    Cubs and Cardinals move to the NL West.
    
    This totally shocks me.  I didn't even know Vincent was considering
    this.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.992 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't leave me hangin, I wanna be gangin | Mon Jul 06 1992 18:41 | 4 | 
|  |     It was supposed to be with Chicago's and St. Louis' consent.
    StL. said yes.  Cubs said no for the reason you mentioned.
    Vincent was forced to force the issue.
    
 | 
| 3.993 | Only makes sense... | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Mon Jul 06 1992 18:58 | 16 | 
|  |     I read that Vincent could use some 'best interest of baseball' rule to force
    the issue, which is obviously what he did.  If the NL goes to a 13-12
    schedule, which they probably will at this point, it really won't
    matter to the Cubs (or anyone else) that much because everyone's
    schedule will be about the same regardless of which divison a team is
    in.  
    
    And I also recall reading a while back where some of the current NL
    West teams were willing to play more day/early evening games against
    the Cubs to accomodate their WGN telecasts.
    
    Funny thing is, the NL will have the same problem in the next year or two 
    if the Giants end up moving to St. Pete.
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.994 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 07 1992 09:44 | 7 | 
|  |     This change will coincide with the addition of the expansion
    franchises.  The Colorado Rockies will play in the NL West, while the
    Florida Marlins will play in the NL East.
    
    The manager of the Mets was interviewed about the change and he's upset
    that the top 2 teams in the NL will be coming into the East division. 
    Boo Hoo.
 | 
| 3.995 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jul 07 1992 10:56 | 8 | 
|  |     My first reaction was damn! the 2 top NL West teams are moving to the
    NL East. Second reaction was that teams strengths change year by year,
    and I would much rather not have the type of schedule that the AL has
    where a team plays more games outside of its division. Poor Cubbie,
    they have a TV problem, tough!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.996 | It was certainly easier with 12 teams | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Tue Jul 07 1992 11:19 | 13 | 
|  | >    and I would much rather not have the type of schedule that the AL has
>    where a team plays more games outside of its division. 
    
    That 13-12 format that the AL uses is probably what the NL will go
    with; it will help ease the pain for the Cubs.  
    
    The other possibilities they're considering are a 20-6 format, but
    that's a little too unbalanced and I doubt that is what the NL will
    use.  Another one under consideration is a 16-9 format with 3 swing
    games that would alternate each year.
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.997 | Guess the Mets are going to have to spend more money | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Tue Jul 07 1992 11:29 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.998 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jul 07 1992 11:41 | 6 | 
|  |     Why realign if they use a balanced schedule?? Makes ZERO sense for
    Vincent to antagonize all these folks if the schedule becomes the sam
    abomination that the AL uses.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.999 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jul 07 1992 11:47 | 18 | 
|  |     re: Cubs
    
    Currently the Cubs play 6 games in each of the West Coast cities for a
    total of 18 games. Assume that at least 4 of those games are Sat/Sun
    games. That leaves 14 potential weekday night games. In a 20-6 schedule
    Cubs might even play 8 Sat/Sun games on the West Coast, but for
    arguments sake lets take the minimum.
    
    With a 20-6 schedule, Cubs would now play 30 games on the West Coast.
    Likelihood is that with 3 10 game West Coast swings Cubs would play 
    8-10 Sat/Sun games. That leaves 20-22 potential West Coast night games.
    Chicago is 2 hours ahead of LA/SF/SD. A 6, 6:30, or 7PM start for just a
    few games (2 in each city) means that the Cubs end up with about as
    many late (9:30PM) starts as they have now. In other words this whole
    TV thing is workable.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1000 |  | FDCV07::KING |  | Tue Jul 07 1992 12:00 | 3 | 
|  |     It's about time!!!!
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.1001 | George is going to make sure of that... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Tue Jul 07 1992 12:52 | 6 | 
|  | 
 9:30 is too late a finish for WGN. They have a highly watched 9:00 news
 program that they don't want to screw with....
 Vincent's just trying to make as many chances as possible before they kick
 his butt out...
 | 
| 3.1002 |  | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Tue Jul 07 1992 15:22 | 1 | 
|  |       It makes no diff!
 | 
| 3.1003 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 08 1992 09:54 | 2 | 
|  |     The Cubs are filing suit against Vincent today in order to remain in
    the NL East.
 | 
| 3.1004 | going legal | HBAHBA::HAAS | WTOE Radio | Wed Jul 08 1992 09:57 | 10 | 
|  | This should be interesting.
The league charter says the commish can't force a team to move without
its permission. It also says a team can't sue the commish. So I guess
it's time for the lawyers to come outta the wood work.
Who knows, maybe corporate sponsors will line up on one side or the
other ;-)
TTom
 | 
| 3.1005 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:30 | 5 | 
|  |     Yes, but the Commissioner has the right to do as he sees fit for the
    "good of the game."  My opinion is that this suit will be tossed as
    being totally frivolous.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1006 | back to $$$s | HBAHBA::HAAS | WTOE Radio | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:47 | 9 | 
|  | The Cubs could make a fairly legitimate case that this moves costs them
dollars in terms of decrease value of their TV package. By moving to the
west a lot of their games will cut into the prime time of WGN, the cable
station that shows the games. 
A possible settlement could be some compensation, if the Cubs start
looking like they have a case for damages.
TTom
 | 
| 3.1007 | The Cubs are already in a different time zone | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:49 | 3 | 
|  |     TTom, most of their games are already in TV primetime and many of the
    West coast clubs have already agreed to move up some starts so that the
    games don't last past midnight east coast time.
 | 
| 3.1008 | convinced | HBAHBA::HAAS | WTOE Radio | Wed Jul 08 1992 10:54 | 5 | 
|  | Mac,
Based on what you've stated, put me in the Ninj camp: it's bogus.
TTom
 | 
| 3.1009 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jul 08 1992 11:10 | 15 | 
|  |     Based on two things - the clause in baseball's constitution prohibiting
    the Commish from being sued and the Commish's power to act in the best
    interests of the game - the suit is bogus.  The good of the game far
    overrides the interests of one team.  I think it even overrides the one
    thing the Cubs have to stand on, that is, the rule stating a team being
    moved must consent to the move.
    
    The Federal Courts (which are the only courts that have jurisdiction
    over something like this) are extremely reluctant to get involved in an
    internal dispute of this type and will almost never overturn something
    that's been a rule of law for a long time (suits brought within the
    last few years of the same type have been tossed as well).
    
    John
                                   
 | 
| 3.1010 | MO | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Jul 08 1992 11:20 | 8 | 
|  |       I agree,  its bogus and the CUBS should get some puffs to help them
    get over it!
    
      I would think if its over some TV time, that they can figure out a
    solution....
    
    
    	Tim
 | 
| 3.1011 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Wed Jul 08 1992 11:58 | 14 | 
|  |     The Cubs actually aren't using the WGN deal as the reason but instead
    saying it will cause 'irreparable injury' to their fans by breaking up
    tradition and some of the the Cubs' big rivalries.  
    
    That's a joke, because divisonal play's only been around since '69 and
    their biggest rival, the Cards, are going West with them.
    
    The Cardinals are mildly complaining about the decision even though
    they voted for it a couple months ago.  Go figure.  I think they're
    just pissed off at the fact the the commissioner went ahead and made
    the decision himself.
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.1012 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 20YearsLater-Iraqgate | Wed Jul 08 1992 12:14 | 10 | 
|  |     RE: Commish has powers for "good of the game"...
    
    	Makes you wonder why Faye let the Lastros upset the entire National
    League schedule so McMullen could make a few bucks off the Republicans.
    Hey I got an idea.  Since the Mets are whining about having to play
    in a competitive division why not move the Mets into the NL West
    (Cubs will still have them as a rival) and move somebody like the
    Giants in the NL East?
    
    				/Solomon
 | 
| 3.1013 |  | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Jul 08 1992 12:54 | 3 | 
|  |       I think that the eastern teams should stay in the east and western in
    the west.  This seems logical,  but we know how logic can screw
    everything up:-(
 | 
| 3.1014 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:19 | 12 | 
|  | 
    Keep in mind that the Cubs (and Braves) were already bent out of shape
    at Vincent because he's made statements that superstation baseball
    telecasts should be scaled back because they hurt the negotiations for 
    national television contracts and subsequently affect league competitive 
    balance.  There's no love lost between Vincent and the Cubs.  It all
    comes back to the issue of the haves and the have nots that he's been
    preaching recently, and the Cubs are one of the haves that don't want
    change... 
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1015 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Networkin' the USA '92 Tour | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:40 | 14 | 
|  |     I think I might be able to support Vincent's position if someone could
    explain to me how this was for the "good of the game." Since divisional
    play started in 1969, the growth of the game has been unmatched in its
    history. It's as though Fay thinks that the NL will go down the tubes
    if the Cubs aren't in the West. A poor judgement on Vincent's part to
    override the NL constitution using the "good of the game" nonsense. The
    entire reason the NL put the clause in about the teams affected needing
    to consent was to prevent this type of thing from happening. Vincent
    had no right to do what he did, whatever the Cubs motives were for
    voting it down. If the Cubs use that approach in court, I don't see how
    they can lose. Vincent went wayyyyyyy overboard.
    
    Dennis
    
 | 
| 3.1016 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Wed Jul 08 1992 14:45 | 9 | 
|  |     What ever happened to common sense ? Why in the hell was Atlanta in the
    West anyhow ? Only because Chicago and ???? threatened to block San
    Diego and Montreal's entry into the NL unless the Cubs stayed in the
    East, and the only way for that to happen was for Atlanta to go West.
    
    Maybe Vincent's reasoning was a little flawed, but it was the right
    thing to do.
    
    Doc
 | 
| 3.1017 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Jul 08 1992 14:50 | 7 | 
|  |     > What ever happened to common sense ? Why in the hell was Atlanta in the
    > West anyhow ?
    
    Same reason the Falcons are in the NFC West?  :-)
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1018 | All-mighty buck | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Time to change the P-Name | Wed Jul 08 1992 15:44 | 12 | 
|  |     
    The move is going to place the bulk of the top NL teams in the East ..  
    The Cubs will be moving to a division where they stand (at least
    near-term) a much greater chance of finishing on top.  
    
    Cubs management is dead-set against the move, due to monetary issues 
    related to TV revenues.  
    
    I guess I see where the Cubs place their emphasis.. and it ain't on 
    winning.   
    
    /Jeff
 | 
| 3.1019 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CubsSay-HellNoWeWontGo | Wed Jul 08 1992 15:56 | 4 | 
|  |     	Scale back the superstations?  They had better not because then
    I would be forced to watch the Red Sox!  8^(
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1020 |  | CTHQ2::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:07 | 7 | 
|  | I may be way off here, but did divisional play start when the Braves were in 
Milwalkee?  Hence, it was natural for them to be in the west.
As for the Falcons, that was an expansion thang.  They came into the NFL when
the west didn't have enough teams, hence were placed in the west to even it out.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1021 | It's about $$$, nothing less | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:09 | 7 | 
|  |  Amazing how the Cubs are all of a sudden concerned with loss of tradition
 and what that would do to their precious fans.
 
 The same Cubs who railroaded lights and night games down their fans'
 throats.  Tradition was certainly the last of their concerns then.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1022 | They've been a model of consistency | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:12 | 3 | 
|  |     Bob, none of the reports I've heard said anything about the Cubs crying
    about tradition.  They have been complaining about west coast time
    zones and impact on WGN right from the start.
 | 
| 3.1023 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:16 | 15 | 
|  |     Divisioal play started in 1969 when Kansas City, Seattle (Pilots, not
    Mariners), San Diego and Montreal were added to MLB.  The Braves had
    been in Atlanta since 1966 and the NL has had their current alignment
    ever since.  It made no logical sense for Chicago and St Louis to be in
    the East and Cincinnati and Atlanta to be in the West, except that both
    Chicago and St Louis wanted to be together (great rivalry) and their
    rivalries with the Mets hadn't gotten off the ground.
    
    If I remember correctly, the AL alignment was:  West - Chicago, KC,
    Minn, Seattle, Oakland, California and the East was Boston, New York,
    Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, Washington and Detroit.  Seattle moved
    to Milwaukee and stayed in the West until the Senators moved to Texas
    and then the Brewers and Rangers swapped divisions.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1024 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:16 | 4 | 
|  |     Just realized my last paragraph in my previous reply listed Detroit
    twice.    Sorry.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1025 | re Paul's quip | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:38 | 10 | 
|  |     
    Actually Paul, the Atlanta were in the NFC West for a similar reason
    as the Braves. back then the NFL had four divisions if I remember
    correctly - the Four C's (Coastal, Capital, Century, and Central),
    which then turned into the West, East, Central .... anyhow the Cowboys
    already had a fair amount of pull and threw a tantrum about their
    natural rivalries vs the Giants and Washington, and got to stay in the
    East (Capital ?), while the Atlanta were shunted west.
    Just another reason to hate Dallas if you ask me ...
 | 
| 3.1026 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 08 1992 16:41 | 3 | 
|  |     Well, Phoenix is now in the East (and actually in St.Louis they were
    still a bit West for East), so maybe it's the Giants and Redskins that
    are to BLAM for being in the wrong division ;^)
 | 
| 3.1027 |  | COBRA::DINSMORE | Slash, the 2nd coming of Andelmen | Wed Jul 08 1992 17:46 | 5 | 
|  |     GO FLORIDA MARLINS!
    
    WHAT A TEAM!
    
    
 | 
| 3.1028 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | Networkin' the USA '92 Tour | Wed Jul 08 1992 22:06 | 21 | 
|  |     I still haven't read one thing that explains why this move is in the
    best interest of baseball. Is there one reason (like balance, wrecking
    the game forever, etc) that would cause Vincwnt to rule this way, other
    than to make the geography of the NL a bit more tidy. That doesn't wash
    IMHO as something that has anything to do with the best interest of the
    game. The Cubs motives for wanting to stay where they are don't really
    matter. They had the right (according to the NL constitution) to say
    no, they did so, and then Vincent decided that baseball as we know it
    would come to an end if the Cubs continued to play in the East.
    
    Kuhn got away with overruling the As trades back in '76 because, in his
    opinion, the competitive balance of baseball would have been harmed by
    allowing Finley to conduct a yard sale with his players. There is no
    such threat here. Vincent is just a bit power hungry. 
    
    BTW - I really think the move would be nice, to tidy up the geography.
    But I don't think you can ignore the NL constitution to "tidy up the
    geography".
    
    Dennis
     
 | 
| 3.1029 | Great note Dennis! | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Thu Jul 09 1992 07:47 | 5 | 
|  | 
 He could have easily put Dinz's in the East Big Game's in the West and went
 with a 13-12 split.....
 mike
 | 
| 3.1030 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 08:37 | 33 | 
|  | In reference to the Football alignment, St. Louis (now Phoenix) was always
in the East, I believe, back when they had just two divisions.
At least that's what I remember.
The East was
	Washington, New York, Baltimore, Dallas, St. Louis, Cleveland
The West was
	Green Bay, Chicago, Minnesota, Detroit, San Fran, LA
That's where most of the great rivalries were formed.
As to baseball, I know I'm a throwback, but i say screw the divisions.
Do it the old fashioned way -- one NL, one AL, one pennant in each,
then a world series.
And while they're at it, let them ride trains again too!
8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1031 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jul 09 1992 09:28 | 14 | 
|  |     Not quite.  Prior to the 1960 expansion, it was:
    
    East:  New York, Washington, Philly, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Chicago
    Cardinals
    
    West:  Baltimore, Green Bay, Detroit, San Francisco, Rams, Bears
    
    Cardinals moved to St Louis in 1961, Dallas came in for 1960 and ended
    up in the East, Minnesota came in for 1961 and ended up in the West. 
    It stayed this way until the Saints and Falcons came in during the
    mid-sixties.
    
    John
    
 | 
| 3.1032 |  | RUGBY1::way | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:11 | 15 | 
|  | Thanks John.
I was doing it from hazy memory.
As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.
My apologies to all the Pittsburgh Steeler fans, and Philadelphia Eagle
fans for forgetting them -- they were some of the flashier helmets at the
time, although I believe that the Eagles had a white wing on green at the
time instead of silver on green....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1033 | :-) | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:17 | 10 | 
|  | � My apologies to all the Pittsburgh Steeler fans, and Philadelphia Eagle
� fans for forgetting them -- they were some of the flashier helmets at the
� time, although I believe that the Eagles had a white wing on green at the
� time instead of silver on green....
 
 You're forgiven.  Just don't let it happen again.  As for the Iggles
 helmets, it never really mattered if they had white wings or not back
 then.  All the tubes were B&W so nobody cared.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1034 |  | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:19 | 6 | 
|  | RE Iggles helmets
I recall a few years when they switched to green wings on a white helmet too.  
Maybe sometime in the 70's.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1035 | The logical choice | SHALOT::MEDVID | skip the hearts and flowers | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:32 | 6 | 
|  |     The starting outfield for the NL All-Stars is Bonds, Gwynn, and
    VanSlyke.  Where did Andy come from?  Last I heard, the final spot was
    between Bonilla and Strawberry.  Are they injured or did VanSlyke get a
    bunch of last-week votes?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1036 | They were a bad team with bad uniforms | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:33 | 15 | 
|  |  � I recall a few years when they switched to green wings on a white helmet
 � too.   Maybe sometime in the 70's.
 
 Yep, during the 1971, 1972, and 1973 seasons, the Iggs wore stark white
 helmets with kelly green wings on them.   They also switched to the
 all-white with green stripes uniforms for their home games.   I still have
 an old pennant from back then with that design.
 
 Since the Iggs were so bad back then, you rarely see those uniforms in any
 old NFL highlight films.   You usually have to watch someone else's films
 to see them.   Catch the one about OJ Simpson's 2,000 yard season in 1973. 
 You'll see plenty of those Eagle green-on-white uniforms trying futilely
 to stop him.  Juice was extremely brutal that year and killed the Eagles.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1037 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Olympic Village Idiot | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:46 | 6 | 
|  |     
    >As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
    >it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.
    
    Probably saw it it "Playboy's Pigskin Preview."
    
 | 
| 3.1038 | Marlins Uniforms - dINz, dis is for you :^) | LCALOR::PETRIE | DECwrite: Chas Barkley of software | Thu Jul 09 1992 10:49 | 110 | 
|  | 
    The South Florida newspapers are full of the Marlins' uniform
    announcement this morning.  By far, the best article is this one,
    featured on the front page of the Ft Lauderdale Sun_Sentinel's
    Sports section.  (Hey, these guys know when to let a professional
    take over :^)  Reproduced wi/out permission. - Kath
                 MARLIN MANNEQUINS: NOT-SO-HOT COUTURE
    				     --	Rod Stafford Hagwood
    					Fashion Editor,
    					Ft Lauderdale Sun_Sentinel
    					July 9, 1992
    These Marlin people have no idea how to hold a fashion show.
    Where are the gilt chairs?
    Where are the socialites?
    For that matter, where is the fashion press? The only journalists
    at Joe Robbie Stadium for the unveiling of the Marlin uniforms
    seem to have something to do with sports coverage.  As I arrive
    for the press conference prepared to fight Italian `Vogue' for my
    seat, baseball writer Gordon Edes pretends not to know me.  It
    seems none of the other baseball writers has brought a fashion
    editor.  Sure, the Miami Herald sent a consultant, but someone
    waylaid him in the parking lot and sent him to faux press
    conference in Oakland Park.
    And while I'm complaining, who are these models?  They look so
    bush league.  Models actually smiling sincerely on the runway?
    "They *are* bush leaguers," columnist Craig Davis tells me. 
    "They're from Kissimmee."
    Oh.
    Anyway, this is obviously going to be like no fashion show I've
    ever seen, for this one is actually brief.  Most last
    approximately the time it takes for an elephant to gestate.  Not
    so with the Marlins.  Four outfits are shown, in mysterious
    categories called "road", "home", "batting", and the much
    ballyhooed "sleeveless home vest."  Ignoring that "sleeveless
    vest" is an oxymoron, I listen intently to Marlins President Carl
    Barger field questions.  He's talking about the vest.
    Ah, yes, the sleeves...
    -----------------------
    "We're tremendously excited about the short sleeve," Barger says. 
    "We thought it looked marvelous and we're enthusiastic.  This
    [uniform] is a blend of tradition and [the region]. It matches
    South Florida.  As they say in the retail world, they'll be a hot
    item."
    Now here's a man who knows how to talk fashion.  Tremendously
    excited.  Looks marvelous.  Blend of tradition.  Hot item.  If he
    had said, They're just so fabulous, I would have thought he
    designed them.
    He didn't.  A committee did.  I catch up with Anne Occi, vice
    president of design for Major League Baseball Properties, after
    all these sports people make a bee-line to Barger to ask about the
    vest and the T-shirt underneath.  There are questions about the
    shade of blue.  Is it teal?  Is it aqua?  Is it of importance to
    anyone? (That last one is mine.)
    Occi tells me how they kept switching elements around.  First the
    lettering was changed a billion times.  Then the black accents
    were changed a zillion times.  Belt loops were hidden, then
    exposed, then put back in the stealth mode.  For a while, orange
    was the color.  Prototypes were sewn up, and they even had fashion
    shows on the diamond - a sort of field of seams - that they
    videotaped to see how the uniforms looked on television and under
    stadium lights and in daylight.  Then came the lettering.
    "The lettering sort of has a fin on it, y'know," Occi says.  "The
    Marlin is embroidered.  I think they really have their own
    personality."
    Oh.
    Scouting Report
    ---------------
    She scares me.  I call a baseball fanatic friend who wants the
    lowdown on the uniforms before she sees them on the evening news. 
    What did you think of them, she asks.
    "Well, the black accents in the socks and the belt as well as the
    road cap will make people think the Marlins are authoritative and
    serious.  The blue - whatever shade of blue it is - will impart a
    feeling of trustworthiness and dependability."
    She tries to interrupt me, but I'm on a roll.
    "Now the only problem I see is that a soft blue like this is a
    warm tone.  If you've had your colors done and are a spring, then
    you're home safe - so to speak.  But if you are a winter or, God
    forbid, an autumn, then there's going to be trouble."
    "Have you lost what precious little was left of your mind?" she
    blurts out, destroying my concentration.
    "They didn't even wear the vest right," I say.  "They put a
    T-shirt underneath.  It should be worn alone with a couple of
    chains and maybe a tattoo on the upper arm; something like `Born
    to Bat'.  And that cap should be turned backward.  Then we could
    have a motto: `Homeboys make better home runs,' for instance. 
    What do you think?"
    She's hung up. I'm not sure when.
 | 
| 3.1039 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Olympic Village Idiot | Thu Jul 09 1992 11:11 | 10 | 
|  |     
    Is there a matching clutch purse that holds batting gloves, tobacco,
    emory boards, bankbooks, and the like?
    
    And the shoes?  What about the complementing foot fashions?
    
    I really need to know.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1040 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Olympic Village Idiot | Thu Jul 09 1992 11:12 | 6 | 
|  |     
    And another thing....If they're going to wear sleeveless shirts, they
    really should shave their pits for national audiences.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1041 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NewYorkSaysNoSLAPing | Thu Jul 09 1992 12:05 | 4 | 
|  |     	If dInZ wears one of those sleeveless shirts, with his guns,
    look out!
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1042 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 14:56 | 16 | 
|  | >    >As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
>    >it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.
>    
>    Probably saw it it "Playboy's Pigskin Preview."
I checked with my mom.  As best as she can remember, I used to subscribe
to something called "Golden Magazine" back then.   Probably put out by
the same folks who make Little Golden Books.
I didn't discover Playboy for another year or two if I remember right....
'Saw
    
 | 
| 3.1043 | :-) | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:27 | 10 | 
|  |  � As best as she can remember, I used to subscribe to something called
 � "Golden Magazine" back then.   
 
 What, no way-back-when fond memories or wispy recollections of the
 importance of the Assyrians or the Incas or the Goths or some other
 ancient tribal society ???
 
 Tsk, tsk, tsk ... we are most severely disappointed.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1044 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:37 | 60 | 
|  | > � As best as she can remember, I used to subscribe to something called
> � "Golden Magazine" back then.   
> 
> What, no way-back-when fond memories or wispy recollections of the
> importance of the Assyrians or the Incas or the Goths or some other
> ancient tribal society ???
> 
> Tsk, tsk, tsk ... we are most severely disappointed.
 
Sigh.  
Well, I do remember quiet fall afternoons, after school, when I'd come
home and the latest issue would come in that day's mail.  Because the
rule was homework first, I'd have to do whatever significant homework
there was to do in first or second grade.
But then I'd stretch out on the living room floor (with a fire going
in the fireplace if it was getting on into late October) and read
the issue.   
For the life of me I can't remember the articles, except that one football
one.  That was good.
But I do remember the fire.  Fire, or the control thereof, was one of
the first big developmental stages in the evolution of Man, and as
I would lay there, feeling the warmth, wrapped in the innocence that
only youth can endown you with, I had little idea that I was re-enacting
an age old ritual.
There, in front of the fire, reading my little Golden Magazine, the 
horizons of my world were expanding in front of me.  There were not
articles on the ancient Incas, or the Goths (or even Visigoths), but
I was learning of my world.   For eons it seems, the fire, be it in
a cave, set in a ring of stones in the woods, or layed carefully on 
the hearth, the fire served as the focal point of the tribe, and
it was around the fire that tradition and learning were passed down
to the younger generation.
Someday I will have my own children, and they too will have a magazine
or a book that they cherish, and those children with gather in front
of the fire.
And sometimes we'll just talk.  I'll tell them of the ancient secrets
of the Mayans, and tell them of those lusty men of the sea, the Vikings,
and I'll pass on to them the right stuff, the stuff that will make
them appreciate life, and life it to the fullest.......
(did that gush enough for you Bob, or should I re-work it???? 8^))
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1045 | 'Saw, is you the Wilson character from "Home Improvement"? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Jul 09 1992 15:50 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1046 | Attaboy !!! | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Thu Jul 09 1992 16:13 | 3 | 
|  | Much much better, 'Saw.
Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1047 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Thu Jul 09 1992 16:35 | 19 | 
|  | Bob, thanks.
Sometimes I forget myself, and just put in normal replies....8^)
Glenn,
No, but I wish I was.  Wilson is such an inspiration to me.  I love the
character -- he has it SO together.
Well, hate to leave in a rush, but I'm off to make a birch canoe.
You know, you just cut away everything that isn't a canoe...8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1048 | Mets are TOO BLAM ! | SALES::THILL |  | Fri Jul 10 1992 10:50 | 28 | 
|  |     Re: Shifting alignment
    
    The thing about this whole Cubs thing is that the METS are really the
    ones TOO BLAM ! See, back in 1968 or so when they decided to let
    Montral and San Diego in and split up the divisions, there was a lot of
    disagreements over how they should make the split. The Mets 2 biggest
    draws were, not surprisingly, the Dodgers and Giants, and they didn't
    want to give up home games with them. As a compromise, the NL said
    we'll give you the Cardinals and Cubs, 2 old, traditional teams. 
    
    As for relative strengths in the divisions, that always fluctuates from
    year to year. Originally, when the Seantors/Rangers moved west and 
    switched divisions with Milwaukee, the White Sox were originally
    supposed to move east, but all the big cities would then be in the
    east. Dunno why that made a difference, but... Anyway, that year, the
    White Sox were 2nd behind the A's in the west, but would have won the
    east by soemthing like 6 games when the Tigers, Red Sox, etc. were in a
    mad scamble....
    
    As for the Cubs plight, screw 'em. The Braves & Reds have been playing a 
    lot on the west coast for 20+ years and they are Eastern teams, yet the
    Cubs whine about the central time zone difference. BTW, the Braves are
    also on a "Superstation," so the same rules should apply.
    
    Funny thing is, I used to *like* the Cubs, but not any more. The
    Tribune Corp has just exposed itself as the money grubbers they are.
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1049 |  | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Coming soon: Lindsey's Sister!! | Fri Jul 10 1992 10:54 | 6 | 
|  | Rat on about the Cubbies.  They had a certain charm about them when ol' PK 
Wrigley was the owner.  Since the Tribune Corp. took over, they have repeatedly
shown self interest over the good of baseball, and worse yet, over tradition 
(lights at Wrigley!)
=Bob= 
 | 
| 3.1050 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jul 10 1992 10:56 | 18 | 
|  |     The more I think about it, the more I think the following:
    
    1.  The geographic realignment is only really necessary if they go to a
    different schedule method than what the American League uses. 
    Geographically, it doesn't really matter what scheme the American
    League uses since the teams in the AL play 6 games in 10 different
    cities and 7 games in the 3 other cities.  Therefore, with a balanced
    schedule, the Cubs don't have a case but on the other hand, there's
    really no need to realign.
    
    2.  If they go to an unbalanced schedule (either the original AL scheme
    of 15 against each team in the division or the proposed NL scheme of 20
    against each team in the division), the Cubs have a case based on TV
    but really not much of a case based on travel.  The Braves and Reds
    will really have a case based on travel since their travel miles and
    times will increase dramatically.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1051 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Fri Jul 10 1992 11:01 | 4 | 
|  |     If the NL goes to an unbalanced schedule, it will most likely be a 16-9
    format with 3 'swing' games.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.1052 |  | EARRTH::BROOKS | Moons Over My Hammy ... | Fri Jul 10 1992 11:17 | 9 | 
|  |     re Bob and Saw
    Shame on you Bob, browbeating 'Saw into being Anthropologically Correct.
    Sigh ....
    :-)
    Doc
 | 
| 3.1053 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Valhalla I am coming! | Fri Jul 10 1992 11:58 | 9 | 
|  | re Doc:    8^)
re Re-alignment.
	Hell, I say pull San Fran and LA back to New York (where they
	belong).   Move Montreal west to Calgary or Vancouver.
	Then let the chips fall where they may......[many 8^)]
 | 
| 3.1054 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NewYorkSaysNoSLAPing | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:00 | 5 | 
|  |     	With their plethora of homerun hitters who can't get out of
    their own way in the field the Cubs probably belong in the ALmost
    League anyway.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1055 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:14 | 5 | 
|  | 
 If the NL doesn't go to an unbalance schedule Fay look bad. Expect them to
 go to it to protect their puppet.....
 mike
 | 
| 3.1056 | What about the Bay Area ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Everybody Wang Chung Tonight | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:20 | 8 | 
|  |  Also with the SF Jints apparently on the move, this realignment might be
 moot in a hurry.  If they move to St Pete, Buffalo or Washington, Vincent
 will have the "geography" question opened up all over again.
 
 Maybe we oughta send MrT to help Fay out.  He'll settle all those nasty
 geography issues.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1057 | looks like he's already there  ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Andre Marrou for President | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:22 | 0 | 
| 3.1058 |  | JUPITR::PARTEE | It's a great day for hockey! | Fri Jul 10 1992 12:39 | 90 | 
|  | From: [email protected] (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: FAY'S WAY: CUBS JOIN FOREIGN LEGION
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 92 22:08:02 EDT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	This man named Fay, who is the baseball commissioner, is said to be a
smart guy. But I wonder. If he's so smart, how come he can't even read a
map?
	You don't have to be an astronaut to figure it out. From Wrigley
Field in Chicago to Shea Stadium in New York, is about 800 miles.
	But if you head the other way from Chicago and go 800 miles, you will
be in a town called Julesburg, Colo.
	And if you get up the next morning and go 800 miles beyond Julesburg,
Colo., you will be in a place called St. George, Utah. So, bored out of
your mind, you go a few hundred miles more and you're finally in Los
Angeles. Which isn't much of a reward for so long a trip.
	So what's my point? That it ought to be obvious that Chicago is a lot
closer to New York than it is to Los Angeles or San Francisco or San
Diego.
	The question is, why does this man named Fay want to upset the
natural order of things by trying to turn Chicago into a Western town?
	That's what Fay is doing when he insists that for the good of
baseball the Cubs must switch to the Western Division of the National
League.
	Why is this good for baseball? It's hard enough being a Cubs fan
without being thrown into a foreign culture.
	Yes, that's what it is. Chicago is not west. It's not exactly east,
either, but it's a lot more east than west.
	In our lifestyles, recreational choices and attitudes, we have little
in common with the other Western Division cities.
	Unlike Denver, this is not a cowboy boot or ski slope city. Unlike
San Diego, this is not a surfing bum town. Unlike Los Angeles, we don't
eat much raw fish. And unlike San Francisco, we don't ... well, most of
us don't, so let's not talk about it.
	But consider the cities that we've been sharing our baseball lives
with for many years. Pittsburgh, for starters. It's not as sooty as it
used to be, but like Chicago, it's still a gritty, ethnic, shot-and-beer
town. If you go into a San Diego bar and order a boilermaker and a
boiled egg, they will call the Health Police.
	There's Philadelphia, another tough ethnic town. Forget about the
Liberty Bell. It's now better known for Rocky Balboa. Try to picture
Rocky working out by punching bloody sides of beef in San Francisco.
Hah, the entire city would faint.
	Why, I remember what happened when Mike Ditka hit a shrieking San
Francisco fan in the head with a wad of his chewing gum. The creature
wailed so loudly that thought was given to turning the matter over to a
federal grand jury. Why, in a real city, like Cleveland or Milwaukee,
the fan would have peeled the gum from his brow and chewed it. Waste
not, want not, a solid heartland virtue.
	And as much as Chicagoans might deny it, we have a great deal in
common with New York. Same silly urge to put up skyscrapers, same kind
of murder rate, goofy street gangs, kinky politicians, racial strife.
Even Al Capone is shared. He became famous in Chicago, but he grew up in
New York.
	When Frank Sinatra performs, he always sings: ``New Yawk, New Yawk,''
and ``My kind of town, Chicaguh is.'' You don't hear him singing, ``My
kind of town, Houston, Texas, is.'' Or, ``Denver, Colorado, if you can
make it there, you can make it anywhere.''
	Apparently this man Fay does not believe in tradition. If he did,
he'd remember that the Cubs have always been in Chicago, and they've
been here since major-league baseball began.
	You don't have to be an ancient to remember when Houston, San Diego
and the others were minor-league cities. If it hadn't been for the
invention of air conditioning, they would still be amusing themselves by
shooting snakes and swatting giant skeeters.
	So after more than a century of being a genuine, big-league
franchise, with a rich tradition going back to the days of tiny gloves
and the dead ball, when men were men and the shortstop was usually
drunk, is this guy Fay saying that we must now try to establish a
rivalry with San Diego, where they sell sushi at the ballpark, or the
Denver Whoosits, which won't even start having a tradition for another
50 years?
	Traditional rivalries are not created by marketing. They come from
years of mutual loathing, vicious joy at the misfortune of others. The
Mets and the Cubs -- the hatred is from the heart.
	But San Diego? Even if I pretended to hate a Padres fan, he would
probably look blankly at me and say: ``Hey, dude, I mean, you want to
use my suntan lotion?''
	We should have expected this years ago, when they started messing
with the natural order by making the Cubs play in the same division as
Montreal, a city of Frenchies, where it's practically against the law to
speak English.
	Now they want to toss the Cubs in with teams from California, where
it's practically against the law to be wide awake. Well, in that regard,
this Cubs team will be competitive.
	
	(C) 1992 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
 | 
| 3.1059 | Could be the first step to the Carolina Giants | SHALOT::MEDVID | dancin' pretzels | Wed Jul 22 1992 13:34 | 6 | 
|  |     Today's Charlotte Observer is carrying the story that Hornets owner
    George Shinn is talking to the owner of the SF Giants about purchasing
    the team.  They are to talk again next week.  If Shinn buys the Giants
    he says he will move them to St. Petersburg.  
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1060 | would be a natural | FRETZ::HEISER | the extremist | Thu Jul 23 1992 12:00 | 1 | 
|  |     Phoenix is talking to them too.  We already host their AAA team.
 | 
| 3.1061 | No facts | SHALOT::MEDVID | dancin' pretzels | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:03 | 5 | 
|  |     Heard last night that Shinn is not interested in the Giants.  Instead,
    he, a lifelong Dodger fan, wants LA and would trade the Hornets
    straight up for the Dodgers.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1062 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't push me cause I'm close to the edge | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:09 | 2 | 
|  |     Cubs won a stay in court to stay in the NL East.
    
 | 
| 3.1063 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:13 | 1 | 
|  |        Amazing!
 | 
| 3.1064 | ?? | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:27 | 3 | 
|  |     What court did they take it to? State, municipal, federal?
    
    
 | 
| 3.1065 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:39 | 76 | 
|  | From nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!decwrl!looking!clarinews Thu Jul 23 13:33:22 EDT 1992
Article 16218 of clari.sports.baseball:
Xref: e2big.mko.dec.com clari.sports.baseball:16218 clari.news.urgent:5615
Path: e2big.mko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!decwrl!looking!clarinews
>From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.local.illinois,clari.news.urgent
Subject: Cubs win stay in realignment
Keywords: baseball, men's professional, legalities
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Supersedes: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 9:05:50 PDT
Location: illinois
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-realign
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 522; Id: z3995; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 7-23-12ped; Ver: 2/4; V: ld
Approved: [email protected]
Codes: ysbprxx., ysblrxx., &sbpril., &sblril.
Note: (complete writethru -- adding Cubs reaction, other detail from judge's
 ruling)
	CHICAGO (UPI) -- A federal judge Thursday issued a court order
temporarily barring baseball Commissioner Fay Vincent from ordering the
Chicago Cubs to move from the National League East to the National
League West.
	U.S. District Judge Suzanne Conlon issued a written opinion on the
Cubs' suit challenging the authority of Vincent to order the division
switch and ``interpreted the league's Constitution, which she construes
as supporting the Cubs' position,'' a court spokesman said.
	Vincent ``exceeded his authority in ordering the transfer'' and his 
``unprecedented action'' violated Article VII of the Major League
Agreement, Conlon wrote. ``The Chicago Cubs may not be transferred to
the Western Division without their consent.''
	Cubs spokeswoman Sharon Pannozzo said the team is ``very pleased''
with the ruling.
	``While the matter is not yet finally resolved, the action today was
a good thing for Chicago, the Cubs, their fans and the game of baseball,
'' the club's statement read.
	There was no immediate reaction from the commissioner and another
hearing was scheduled for July 31.
	The Cubs argued Vincent's decision to move the team to the NL West is
``absurd'' and ``not in the best interests of baseball.''
	Vincent on July 6 ordered the Cubs and St. Louis Cardinals to move to
the NL West and the Cincinnati Reds and Atlanta Braves to the NL East
next season. Vincent said he ordered the change to make the two
divisions geographically correct.
	The judge's decision to issue a preliminary injunction Thursday
apparently will delay that change for at least one more season. The suit
has held up finalization of next season's schedule for more than a
month.
	The Cubs and parent the Tribune Co. -- which also owns WGN-AM and TV,
the Cubs' main broadcast outlet -- objected to the change, largely
because the move may mean more late-night games on the West Coast and a
subsequent drop in advertising revenue. The move also would water down
the Cubs' longtime rivalry with the New York Mets.
	Vincent argued he has the authority to make the move without the
approval of the teams under wording granting him virtually unlimited
power to act ``in the best interests of baseball.''
	``But that interpretation would ... produce the absurdity that the
commissioner could order the Cubs to play in the American League or even
destroy the very leagues and clubs that created the commissioner,'' the
Cubs argued.
	The Cubs said although the commissioner has the authority to alter
any ``act, transaction or practice,'' he does not have unlimited
authority and his power does not extend to ``the pre-existing structure
of baseball and a league's failure to change it.''
	Vincent claimed his authority to act in the best interests of
baseball is so strong that the Major League Agreement bars legal action
by clubs contesting his decisions. He said the Cubs' claim they would
suffer irreparable harm if the transfer goes through is ``nothing more
than unbridled speculation and conjecture.''
    
 | 
| 3.1066 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:44 | 22 | 
|  |     re: Cubs
    
    1) Lets see what happens if the court give a permanent injunction and
    the case moves out of the Chicago area.
    
    2) One of the reasons that Vincent could not force Steinbrenner to sell
    his team was that no court would have approved such a move because it
    meant essentially taking someones property. Sure Steinbrenner could
    have sold, but forcing him to sell would have lowered what he could
    have gotten for the team. I wonder if this case will fall into the same
    category, at least as far as the courts are concerned. Of course the
    Cubs also have the NL constitution working in their favor.
    
    That aside I think the Cubs are being very pig-headed about this, and
    that they should be moved to the Western division.
    
    Sigh, guess we'll have thaty god-awful AL type schedule in the NL next
    year. Watch, Mets will finish playing Cardinals or Pirates or whoever
    int the East in June or July - blech!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1067 | Must be consistent with this year's alignment | SHALOT::MEDVID | dancin' pretzels | Thu Jul 23 1992 13:58 | 5 | 
|  |     What will happen if the Giants move to St. Pete?  Seems no one in the
    Bay area wants to build them a new stadium.  What team do you move out
    west then?
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1068 | REDSOX! | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Jul 23 1992 14:06 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1069 |  | MAPVAX::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 23 1992 15:26 | 7 | 
|  |     That long time tradition of playing the Mets started in what, 1960 or
    so?  Oooohhh, I'm impressed.
    
    What would be so terrible about making the Cubs move to the AL?  I
    don't think it would happen anyway since there is already an AL club in
    Chicago.  Professional Football moved some NFL teams into the AFC yet
    the world is still revolving.
 | 
| 3.1070 | I can see the Cubs *fans'* complaints... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Jul 23 1992 15:59 | 17 | 
|  |                                         
    > That aside I think the Cubs are being very pig-headed about this, and
    > that they should be moved to the Western division.
    
    After hearing some other opinions and thinking about it, I've changed 
    my mind on this.  Granted the Cubs are probably only worried about the 
    almighty dollar, but what *should* be the issue?  It should be about 
    what the fans in the affected cities want.  If I were a Chicago Cubs
    fan, I wouldn't be happy about the divisional change.  If I were an
    Atlanta, Cincinnati, or St. Louis fan, I probably wouldn't be happy 
    about it either.  Why should I be?  I'm not the one who has to foot the
    travel bills, and I've gotten used to the rivalries.  If geography is
    a real problem, it should have been dealt with in 1969 when the
    divisions were set up this way...
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.1071 | Fans don't seem upset | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Jul 23 1992 16:19 | 8 | 
|  |     re: .1070
    
    But we haven't really heard complaints from fans in Atlanta, Cincy,
    Chicago, or St. Louis. In fact the only bitching by other clubs was 
    about Vincent making the decision the way he did.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1072 | Funny stuff coming outta Chi | SHALOT::HUNT | Was KO too late for SERP ??? | Thu Jul 23 1992 16:41 | 13 | 
|  |  And like I said before, the Cubs didn't exactly give a crap when their
 oh-so-important fans complained about the lights.
 
 But now all of a sudden, it's the fans they're trying to protect.  Yeah,
 right.  It's their purse strings they're trying to protect.   Since when
 has it been otherwise.
 
 Major rollward on the rivalry with the Mets angle.  Yeah, we don't want to
 go west, young man, 'cause we wanna see the Mets come to town the usual 9
 times a year instead of maybe 6 times under the new system.   <insert
 major guffaws>
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1073 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RIP Howard Stern | Fri Jul 24 1992 06:26 | 2 | 
|  |     It's a great day for the Chicago Tribune, WGN and the Nine O'Clock
    News!
 | 
| 3.1074 | the guy who said "Cubs Whine" is right on | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Jul 24 1992 09:02 | 5 | 
|  |     Funny, the Braves play in the West and I never hear complaints from
    them about revenue lost in night games with SF/SD/LA...
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1075 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jul 24 1992 09:12 | 2 | 
|  |      'TBS has no nightly news show.
                                  Denny
 | 
| 3.1076 | And no, I'm not a Cubs' fan... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Jul 24 1992 09:23 | 26 | 
|  |                                                 
> And like I said before, the Cubs didn't exactly give a crap when their
> oh-so-important fans complained about the lights.
> 
> But now all of a sudden, it's the fans they're trying to protect.  Yeah,
> right.  It's their purse strings they're trying to protect.   Since when
> has it been otherwise.
    
    C'mon, Bob.  The Cubs schedule something like 12 night games a year,
    which still represents the most "pure" environment in baseball, 
    especially for the kids.  The real issue with the lights was having
    them there for potential postseason games and the All-Star game, and
    that's MLB's baby, not the Cubs' (Uebberoth was threatening to move
    Cubs' postseason games to a neutral site).  And most of the people 
    squawking about the lights were the people who lived in the Wrigley 
    neighborhood, anyway, not the average fan on the street.
    
    If the Cubs are to be condemned for bringing in a small amount of night
    baseball 40 years after everyone else did, what does that say for
    everyone else?  By that standard, some of these
    no-day-games-but-Sunday-100%-artificial-playing-surface-under-a-dome
    teams know no limits when it comes to greed... 
    
    glenn
    
    
 | 
| 3.1077 | They shouldn't complain, they're raking it in as it is... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Jul 24 1992 09:30 | 12 | 
|  | 
    > Funny, the Braves play in the West and I never hear complaints from
    > them about revenue lost in night games with SF/SD/LA...
    
    The Braves have absolutely no complaint whichever way the decision goes.
    They, the Mets, and the Cubs (in that order) have virtually cornered the 
    market on nationally-televised superstation baseball, which can't change 
    under the current laws because the number of free superstations allowed 
    in a cable market is strictly regulated (at two)...
    
    glenn 
    
 | 
| 3.1078 | Unbalanced schedule may be Tribune's big fear | NROPST::MPO12::MCFALL | This is the end of the innocence | Fri Jul 24 1992 11:38 | 10 | 
|  | 
	In regards to the $$$$ lost due to the 9 PM news being lost - true,
if the AL balanced schedule is used, only  5-6 nights are affected. However,
if an unbalanced schedule is used, playing another 3 dates in each of
LA, San Francisco, San Diego, and Houston, plus 9 games in Denver instead
of Miami, and you could see another 12 nights being affected. That's real
enough for me. What Vincent COULD do, is offer the 4 teams involved some
financial incentive to "ease the burden", as it were. 
	Jim M
 | 
| 3.1079 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Jul 24 1992 13:43 | 5 | 
|  |     The teams on the West Coast have already offered some earlier start
    times, that should solve the WGN News issue.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1080 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Jul 24 1992 15:01 | 11 | 
|  |                    
    We've got a contradictory argument going here.  Everyone is saying that 
    the Cubs are motivated solely by greed, but at the same time they're 
    saying that they're not going to lose any money because the schedule 
    changes and West Coast start times aren't going to be drastically 
    different.  So which is it?  Maybe the Cubs just don't want to mess 
    around with what they feel is a decent formula, and I really can't 
    blame them for that...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1081 |  | ANGLIN::PAPACEK |  | Mon Jul 27 1992 09:50 | 17 | 
|  |     
    I think the main loss to WGN would be in advertising revenues.   They
    most likely have different rates of west coast games based on viewer
    levels.    And since west coast games would start at 9:00 (CDT), 
    there would also be disruption of the 9:00 news and it's ad revenues.
    
    The local Fox network had been trying to break into the 9:00 news slot
    and this would give them more opportunities to gain market share with
    the non-baseball fans.
      
    Rest assured, money is the primary reason. WGN wouldn't go through all 
    this for the fans.  It is a decent formula today, (except for Cincinatti 
    and Atlanta) but in the long term interests of baseball - I agree with 
    Faye.
    
    Pat
    
 | 
| 3.1082 | Now we'll see what Cincy is made of. | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Jul 27 1992 12:25 | 13 | 
|  |     How 'bout dem Braves?
    
    Wining 13 of 14 with EXCITING baseball. Think they'll hold off the
    Reds?  Glavine, Avery, Smoltz, Liebrandt and the opposition praying
    for monsoons.
    Can any of our Southern brethren tell us if the "Chop" is still
    fervently practiced?  Haven't heard much of the way in protest. 
    Waiting for the klieg lights of postseason?
    
    
    MikeL
     
    
 | 
| 3.1083 | Glad Ninj ain't here. >< of, in | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Jul 27 1992 12:27 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1084 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't push me cause I'm close to the edge | Mon Jul 27 1992 12:40 | 4 | 
|  |     They still do it, but I don't know if they beat the tom-tom any more.
    More unofficial, then official, from what I can tell.  Then again,
    they did have Budweiser tomahawk night earlier this year.
    
 | 
| 3.1085 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Mon Jul 27 1992 14:10 | 6 | 
|  | Anyone see Otis Nixon's catch from Friday night?   
HE should be in the Olympics in the high jump.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1086 | Musta done some toot before the game | SHALOT::MEDVID | the profits of addictive extinction | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:13 | 10 | 
|  | >Anyone see Otis Nixon's catch from Friday night?   
    
    That was probably the greatest catch I have ever seen.  There are lots
    of homerun stealing catches, but that one was all one fluidly timed
    motion.
    
    VanSlyke's face at that moment was pretty priceless too.  If the Pirates
    lose the division by one game, I'll always look to that moment.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1087 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:23 | 5 | 
|  | That's where Van Slyke's quote I put in came from - Nixon is the 'ex-President'
Absolutely amazing catch.
JD
 | 
| 3.1088 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:26 | 16 | 
|  |     
>    That was probably the greatest catch I have ever seen.  There are lots
>    of homerun stealing catches, but that one was all one fluidly timed
>    motion.
    
    	Ahh Dan'l you're just showing your age, or lack of....  I saw the
    catch and it was a great one, but Clemente used to do that sort of 
    thing a couple of times a year and he did it for 18 years!  He'd
    make a catch like that and then throw out the runner tagging up at
    home with a rope on the fly!!  None of this worm-burner stuff..
    
    You know, he wasn't called 'the great one' for nuttin.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
 | 
| 3.1089 | I know it was one of the best I've ever seen, in that situation... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:31 | 7 | 
|  | 
    Waitaminute, Bill, wasn't Clemente flat on his back on the other side
    of that wall when he stole away that game-winning home run and made the 
    throw home to catch the speedy runner tagging from third?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1090 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Mon Jul 27 1992 15:49 | 11 | 
|  | >
>    Waitaminute, Bill, wasn't Clemente flat on his back on the other side
>    of that wall when he stole away that game-winning home run and made the 
>    throw home to catch the speedy runner tagging from third?  ;-)
    
Yeah, after he was blinded by the sun, and he was actually slowed some
on his run, because he caught a spike in a drain.....
8^)    
 | 
| 3.1091 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Sir Charles, the Dream Bully | Mon Jul 27 1992 16:03 | 7 | 
|  |     
    And how could you fail to mention that Clemente's catch was when
    players had to run through snow drifts, uphill, and milk the cows
    before they could throw home!  Those were real players in those days.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1092 |  | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Jul 27 1992 16:31 | 27 | 
|  |     
    
    	Ahh, you guys are just jealous that you never saw the great one
    play in person!  
    
    	Ahh, to remember the days when a single to right wasn't automatic
    to score from second...that is with Clemente in right.  Ahh, to
    remember when the great one used to throw out runners at first on
    a supposed base hit.  Ahh, to remember that the great one didn't
    need to roll the ball to the plate like most outfielders do today.
    Ahh, to remember the great one climbing the ivy at Forbes... Ahh,
    to remember that nobody went from 1st to 3rd on a basehit to right
    when Roberto was there.  
    
    	Ahh...memories are great!  They don't make 'em like Roberto
    anymore!
    
    	You guys can have the candy-armed outfield of today along with
    the bushel-baskets they use for gloves along with the "I made a
    great catch in my 10 year career...once."  I'll still take the great
    one even if he did have to play in raging wind storms, hail, snow,
    drifts, and searing heat.  You guys are weenies and deserve
    the weiners you root for who are desguised as baseball players.
    
    	Now, you wanna talk about park effects?
    
    
 | 
| 3.1093 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Jul 27 1992 16:50 | 5 | 
|  |     Jealousy - nope. I saw Clemente play against the Mets in either 1970 or
    1971, maybe 1972.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1094 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | Sun-ripened for Mildness! | Mon Jul 27 1992 20:23 | 15 | 
|  |     re the Tomahawk Chop
    
    Yeah, they still do it.  Watched some of the games from Atlanta this
    weekend and got sick of seeing all of those people looking like Pee Wee
    Herman in an adult theatre every time some Brave player came to bat.
    
    Re Clemente
    
    Saw him play from '60 or '61 when I started going to Pirate games until
    he died.  Was at the game he got his 3000th, and last, hit( a double).
    He definitely was the best right fielder I've ever seen, either in
    person or on the idiot box.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1095 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 28 1992 12:13 | 3 | 
|  | �                   -< Musta done some toot before the game >-
    
    A cheap shot, and in very poor taste.
 | 
| 3.1096 | My Idol and Hero.. The Greatest.. | MOCA::REYES_J |  | Tue Jul 28 1992 14:18 | 13 | 
|  |     
    	RE: Clemente..
    
    		I got the honor of seeing him play in person in Wrigley
    Field a couple of times.. And on the tube a bunch of times.. He was
    without a doubt the great one. The idol of many baseball fans and not
    even baseball fans. 
    
    		I've always been a Met's fan and when the Buc's played the
    Met's, of course I wanted the Met's to win but I always rooted for Mr.
    Clemente even if it meant a loss. 
    
    	Julio
 | 
| 3.1097 | calling TcM, calling TcM...... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue Jul 28 1992 14:25 | 10 | 
|  |     Speaking of the Mets,  isn't "the greatest team money can buy"
    
    2 games below .500?
    
    ~/~
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1098 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:28 | 9 | 
|  |     re: .1097
    
    Nah that title is reserved for with the Dodgers or the Red Sox,
    and btw that quip will cost you a beer on Friday at the OTP :-)
    
    and that is TCM to you, not TcM :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1099 | I'd rather have poor taste than poor judgement | SHALOT::MEDVID | the profits of addictive extinction | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:44 | 11 | 
|  | >�                   -< Musta done some toot before the game >-
>    
>    A cheap shot, and in very poor taste.
    
    I don't think it's poor taste at all.  Otis Nixon was suspended from
    baseball last season for drugs.  He was/is a drug adict.  He gets
    little respect as a person from me.  Betcha he gets suspended "for
    life" within the next two years.
    
    	--dan'l
    
 | 
| 3.1100 |  | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | Personal Computer Group | Tue Jul 28 1992 16:23 | 8 | 
|  |     Pretty compassionate of you Dan'l.
    
    The fact that he is (apparently) able to overcome his dependency on
    chemicals and still rise to such a level of athleticism speaks volumes
    of his character.
    
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.1101 |  | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF |  | Tue Jul 28 1992 16:25 | 11 | 
|  |   Count me as another Roberto Clemente fan. It always seemed like the tougher
  the competition, the better the "Great One" played. I remember more than 
  once when Sandy Koufax was in his prime, he would 3 or 4 hit the Bucs.
  Clemente usually had 2 or 3 of those hits. 
  Also, he had the best arm in the outfield for any baseball player
  I've ever seen. 
  I always thought he'd play forever until that plane crash in the Caribbean.
		Keith
 | 
| 3.1102 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Jul 28 1992 16:26 | 5 | 
|  |     Defining moment for me wrt Clemente was leading the Bucs back against
    the Orioles in the 1971 WS after they were down 2-0.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1103 |  | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF |  | Tue Jul 28 1992 16:33 | 9 | 
|  | >    Defining moment for me wrt Clemente was leading the Bucs back against
>    the Orioles in the 1971 WS after they were down 2-0.
    
  Yep, I think he had something like 7 RBI's in the series and twice he
  nailed runners trying to stretch doubles into triples. In both cases, they 
  would have been triples if anyone else was playin right field. The throws
  made great highlight films.
  
	Keith    
 | 
| 3.1104 | Yeah, that's a pretty tough stance... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Jul 28 1992 17:02 | 16 | 
|  | 
    > The fact that he is (apparently) able to overcome his dependency on
    > chemicals and still rise to such a level of athleticism speaks volumes
    > of his character.
    
    Not to mention that Otis Nixon is only one of many ballplayers who have
    used drugs over the years, like a fair portion of the 1979 Pittsburgh 
    Pirates championship team who were implicated in baseball's famous 
    drug scandal of the early 1980s, including the wonderful virtuous 
    Willie Stargell who've we already heard that no present-day ballplayer 
    can ever hope to approach.  You hate to see it, but drug use hits home 
    all over and often without any sense or reason to it, and there has to 
    be at least a second chance...
    
    glenn
       
 | 
| 3.1105 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Thu Aug 06 1992 12:40 | 3 | 
|  |     It's been announced that the expansion draft will be Nov. 17th.
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.1106 | Maybe a place for 'Door' Matt Young? | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 06 1992 13:01 | 3 | 
|  |        Just think about how really BAD the pitching staffs of these 2 new
    teams are gonna be! Does the American League get to lose players too?
                                 Denny
 | 
| 3.1107 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 07 1992 08:58 | 5 | 
|  |     Yes, the American League gets to lose players too.  But, they won't
    lose as many as National League teams.  The two leagues cut a deal that
    says the American League teams can protect more players, and in
    exchange, they get a smaller share of the franchise fees from the new
    teams.
 | 
| 3.1108 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | We'reMorePopularThanCheeses� | Fri Aug 07 1992 09:21 | 1 | 
|  |     	MY Braves completed their sweep of the Reds last night!
 | 
| 3.1109 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Aug 07 1992 09:29 | 2 | 
|  | 
/DonVane (TM)
 | 
| 3.1110 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | We'reMorePopularThanCheeses� | Fri Aug 07 1992 09:47 | 3 | 
|  |     	Shaadup JD.  I'm a loooong time Braves fain.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1111 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Aug 07 1992 10:01 | 6 | 
|  | /DonVane(TM) -
Nexted thing ya know, you'll turn into Dr. /DonVane(TM) and claim you used
to live in Atlanta!
JD
 | 
| 3.1112 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Fri Aug 07 1992 10:54 | 9 | 
|  |     RE: Expansion draft
    
    36 players will be drafted by each team:
    Each NL team will lose 3 players (36)
    8 AL teams will lose 3 players   (24)
    6 AL teams will lose 2 players   (12)
    
    
    Joe
 | 
| 3.1113 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:06 | 3 | 
|  |        Hey /Don, when you see Dinz tell him to write to his new favorite
    team, the Marlins , and beg them to draft Matt Young and Jack Clark!!
                                 Denny
 | 
| 3.1114 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:14 | 10 | 
|  |     One thing that may make the expansion team of 1993 better than thos in
    the past is free agency. When Toronto and Seattle got franchises, free
    agency was just starting. The guy who owns the Marlins has oodles of
    money. With Bonds, Sierra, Maddux, Cone, Drabek (I know I am missing
    some) all free agents this year an expansion team can become
    competitive very quickyl and real contenders in a ear or two. Granted
    signing free agens is a crapshoot, but it has helped teams before.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1115 | The Expansion Draft Explained | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:27 | 68 | 
|  |               <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 287.3                  How does Expansion Work?                      3 of 7
AIAG::KURAS "Lou, pull up your socks!"               60 lines   6-AUG-1992 08:13
                         -< Official Expansion Rules >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 3105 of clari.sports.baseball:
Path: engage.pko.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!ub!rutgers!stanford.edu!bcm!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball
Subject: Expansion draft set for Nov. 17
Keywords: baseball, men's professional
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 5 Aug 92 23:18:51 GMT
Lines: 41
Approved: [email protected]
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-draft
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 418; Id: z6744; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 8-5-710ped
Codes: ysbprxx., tnrb...., txia....
	NEW YORK (UPI) -- Fans of the expansion Colorado Rockies and Florida
Marlins should mark Tuesday, Nov. 17, on their calendars.
	That's the day major-league baseball will hold its expansion draft to
fill the rosters of the National League's two newest clubs, the
commissioner's office announced Wednesday.
	The three-round draft, which will be held at New York's Marriott
Marquis Hotel, is the first such event since Nov. 5, 1976, when the
Toronto Blue Jays and Seattle Mariners stocked their rosters with
castoffs from the other major-league clubs.
	Under a fairly complicated set of rules, 1993's expansion teams will
choose a total of 72 players from the pool of talent left unprotected by
the 26 other major-league teams.
	The Rockies and Marlins begin play this coming season.
	All players in an existing organization are eligible to be drafted,
except two categories of players with no prior major-league experience.
	The first group consists of players who have less than three years of
service if signed at age 19 or older. The other is those players with
less than four years of service who were signed at 18 or younger.
	From the eligible list, each major-league team may protect 15 players
before the draft. So-called 10-and-5 players -- those with 10 years of
major-league service and five straight with the same club -- must be
protected unless they waive that right.
	Players with no-trade contracts must also be protected.
	After a coin flip determines which order the expansion clubs will
select, the teams will alternate choices until each of the existing
teams has lost one player in the first round.
	Then, after each expansion team has drafted 13 players, each American
League team may protect an additional four players while each National
League club may protect another three.
	The Rockies and Marlins will then alternate picks through the second
round, after which each will have a roster of 26 players.
	Before the third and final round of the draft, each AL team will be
allowed to protect yet another four players and each NL team yet another
three.
	During the third round, each NL team will lose one player, and eight
of the fourteen AL teams will lose one -- giving the Rockies and Marlins
10 picks apiece in the round.
	At the end, each expansion club will have selected 36 players. Each
NL team, along with eight AL teams, will have lost three players, while
six AL teams will have lost two players.
    
 | 
| 3.1116 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | We'reMorePopularThanCheeses� | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:33 | 11 | 
|  |     	My guess is both owners, no matter how much money they have,
    will not spend big in the free agent market.  They may go after
    a marquee type player to sell tickets, but if they have already
    sold a large number of tickets, they'll pass on the big name.
    These guys have already shelled out big bucks through some type
    of financing and will not be looking to pay out big salaries right
    away.  The expansion clubs will probably draft younger cheaper players
    and hope that the novelty of a new team will carry them with regards
    to ticket sales for the first few years.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1117 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 07 1992 12:58 | 4 | 
|  |        A noter from the Bay area just reported in another conference that
    the SF Giants will announce this afternoon that they're moving to
    Tampa/St Pete. 
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.1118 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 07 1992 13:00 | 3 | 
|  |        Mebbe this will be an out for the Fayster. He cain leave the cubbies
    in the West now!
                                  Denny
 | 
| 3.1119 | from a friend in the Tampa Bay area - confirmed on CNN | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Aug 07 1992 16:22 | 13 | 
|  | 
Tampa TV stations and radio are ablaze with a press conference announcing 
the purchace of the SF (nee Tampa Bay)  Giants, moving to the west coast
of Florida for 1993.
According to WFLA, and the press conf at the dome, Lurie (current Giants
owner) has aggreed to the sale, $110,000,000.00. They are even going to
call it 'Giants Dome' !!!
League approval of sale is all that remains .... 
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1120 | Hey Fay, remember when you said franchise moves aren't healthy? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 07 1992 16:47 | 9 | 
|  |     
    Note to Fay Vincent: this sale is not "in the best interests of the
    game".  I urge you at once to use your powers, as asserted in the
    realignment battle, to nullify it regardless of what decision the 
    National League or all MLB owners make.  "Giants Dome"?  I think I'm
    going to be sick already...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1121 | Just a matter of time... | SHALOT::MEDVID | there is really no-one left | Fri Aug 07 1992 16:53 | 12 | 
|  |     Lurie said last week that he was entertaining all offers anywhere since
    the voters had turned him down three times on a new stadium.  Looks
    like he wasn't bluffing.
    
    I see this as good news for Pittsburgh.  Huh?  Well, personally I
    thought for sure that attendance in Pittsburgh (or lack thereof) would
    eventually get the best of the owners and we'd be seeing the St.
    Petersburg Pirates before the year 2000.  With one less market to be
    attractive, that may keep the Pirates in Pittsburgh until at least
    2005.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1122 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Aug 07 1992 18:02 | 9 | 
|  |     Whatever the pros and cons of the Giants getting a new stadium, the
    cities in the Bay area certainly had their chance to keep the Giants
    and decided that it was not worth it. Lurie was turned down 4 times.
    
    re: Vincent. Agreed. Except Vincent formulated the guideines under
    which a team could move and the Giants fit all of them.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1123 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Mmmmmmm, Doughnuts. | Fri Aug 07 1992 18:42 | 17 | 
|  | 
How come the Giants don't have a clause in their candlestick lease tying them
to it if they get xxx number of fans or tying Lurie into offering the team to 
local ownership before he moves them...
The SF area fans have shown that they support the team. The Bay area fans 
have indicated that they aren't willing to fork over thier own money to build
a stadium for a millionaire owner when the current one is adequate for the
teams needs. 
If I was Vincent (thank goodness I'm not) I would nix this sale in a second.
Lurie can't demonstrate lack of support for the team. THe only thing he can 
demonstrate is the intelligence of bay area voters....
Metz
 | 
| 3.1124 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Aug 07 1992 18:58 | 7 | 
|  |     Metz,
    
    I will buy the argument about the millionaire owner, etc. I will not
    accept that Candlestick is a reasonable ballpark to play in.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1125 | SAY IT AIN'T SO !!!! | WR2FOR::WALSTON_CH | Life Has No Finish Line | Fri Aug 07 1992 19:28 | 32 | 
|  |     
    
         Yeees Siiireeee Sports Fans!!!
    
    
    
        It is, again, a sad day in Bay Area history. Radio KNBR, GAINTS radio, 
     announced today a statement by Bob Laurie that he has sold the giants
    to a Tampa/St. Petey party. Going price 111M.
    
    
         Being a life long Giants fan, I am now officiallly in mourning. I
    have been in "unofficial" mourning since June 2, when the sorry a$$
    voters of San Jose, turned down one of the best offer the city ever had. 
    Before you start getting on my case, I am a San Jose resident, and 
    I VOTE!
    
         I really can not be upset at Bob Laurie, after a decade and 4
    failed stadium ballots,time has run out for the piddley minor league
    cities in the South Bay. After all, baseball is "Big Business", and  
    maybe it is for the better. Time will tell.I know that the Tampa/St. Petey 
    community will welcome them with open arms. But, unfortunately at the 
    expense of other loyal followers. Trust me, loyal fans here breathe 
    Orange and Black.
    
        But still, I can't help but to feel the emptiness. Like the day when 
    Roberto Clemente's plane went down. Not personal enough to be a true 
    tragedy, but I know my life will forever be changed.... 
    
        Chuckers
    
                                 
 | 
| 3.1126 | Now here's an Option. | WR2FOR::WALSTON_CH | Life Has No Finish Line | Fri Aug 07 1992 19:48 | 10 | 
|  |     
    
         RE .1121
    
    
         San Francisco would be a great market for the Pirates. Who knows
    maybe even the Riaders will come back to Oakland.
    
         Chuckers
    
 | 
| 3.1127 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Fri Aug 07 1992 23:53 | 2 | 
|  |     Glad I'll get to see a game out there now...
    
 | 
| 3.1128 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Sat Aug 08 1992 00:39 | 3 | 
|  |     And Monday to boot... the first game after their road trip after their
    announcement... out to be fun...
    
 | 
| 3.1129 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Sun Aug 09 1992 23:55 | 5 | 
|  |        Bring your coat with you Walt. The 'stick cain be brutal in August.
    I can't fault the Giants in this, the stadium is a real hellhole.
    Can't fault the voters either, they're still revovering from the quake.
    Look for the Reds to stay in the West.
                                         Denny
 | 
| 3.1130 | What baseball is supposed to be. (-: | SHARE::DERRY | Take your time...hurry up. | Mon Aug 10 1992 06:24 | 2 | 
|  |     The third base coach for the Braves is gonna need rotator cuff surgery
    from waving all those runs home.  
 | 
| 3.1131 |  | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Mon Aug 10 1992 11:04 | 7 | 
|  |     HAHA Karen,
    Now what's Zim need? Knee surgery? From pleading with the hitters
    to heed his signs whilst on his knees?  Po' Rooster'll need arthro
    also.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1132 | Times are-a-changin' | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Aug 10 1992 12:21 | 27 | 
|  |     Well, I guess this means the Cubbies will HAVE to go to the west. With the 
    Giants moving to St Pete they would be in the Eastern Division, and it
    would be a good georgaphical rivalry with the Braves, so the Reds would
    probably have to be the ones to stay in the West.
    
    One (far-fetched) rumor I saw in the Sunday Globe is that they were
    thinking of having the Giants and Milwaukee Brewers switching LEAGUES.
    This would probably never happen; people fuss over the Cubs-Mets and
    other rivalries that still play each other, even if they are in
    different divisions. I can't imagine that they would make it so the
    Dodgers and Giants would only meet in a World Series. If it was, say,
    the Expos, Pardes or a new team joining the AL, maybe, but not a 100+
    year old franchise. 
    
    On the other hand, it would make sense from a regional point of view.
    The Southeast would have 2 NL teams (Braves, Marlins) and Tampa Bay in
    the AL. Every other region is balanced with no more than one extra team
    from either league except the upper midwest - Twins, WSox, Brewers in
    the AL and Cubs in the NL. Now if the Braves had stayed in Milwaukee
    and the AL got Atlanta, this wouldn't be a problem. How bout the Giants
    move to Milwaukee and stay in the NL, and the Brewers go to the new
    group in Tampa Bay and stay in the AL? Unless one team has a ton of
    prospects on the farm or some other hidden asset, it really shouldn't
    matter which team winds up where.
    
    Tom 
    the AL
 | 
| 3.1133 | Baseball tradition and stability dead? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Aug 10 1992 13:03 | 39 | 
|  | 
    I can't see the NL giving up what is certain to be a big money-making 
    franchise (at least in the short term) in the Tampa Bay Giants for the 
    very ordinary Milwaukee franchise.  Tampa Bay is going to be selling out
    that ridiculous wedge-shaped dome of theirs for years to come, and that 
    benefits the visiting clubs as well as the home team.
    
    Why is Candlestick Park considered such a hell-hole, or "the worst park
    in baseball" as Peter Gammons puts it?  Apparently someone forgot to tell
    the approximate 2 million fans a year who were showing up as late as
    1990 when the Giants were at least putting an average ballclub on the
    field (or if they did tell them, the fans didn't seem to care, and that's
    all that should-- but doesn't-- matter to baseball).  I've been to the 
    Stick on a few occasions and I can say that I'd rather see a ballgame 
    there than at any of the domed stadiums in baseball, or the cookie-cutters 
    in Pittsburgh and Cincinnati and St. Louis, or even Shea Stadium, for that 
    matter.  Sure, the weather can be harsh, but this is really only by 
    California standards.  I was there on one of the supposedly "unbearable" 
    windy nights and, in my opinion, the weather in general is not nearly as 
    bad as at the outdoor parks in the east in April and most of May. 
    
    I think this issue isn't really about Bob Lurie being cheap or about
    the Bay Area politicians being intransigent, but rather once again 
    about baseball's economic situation regarding small markets/small TV 
    contracts/small supplemental income sources.  I don't doubt that Bob 
    Lurie can't make money in the current situation in San Francisco, but 
    I'm also not convinced that baseball presented the Bay Area communities 
    with reasonable and fair stadium proposals.  As TV income plummets in 
    the 1990s, I look for more of these moves to take place, and the fans 
    of the smaller cities, who in hard times aren't willing to hand over 
    their wallets, to take the blame from Fay Vincent and company.  
    
    Baseball needs to share its own wealth before it asks the fans in its 
    smaller markets for fork over theirs, or any sense of tradition 
    surrounding these cities and their ballclubs will be lost to whomever 
    is willing to put up the short-term bucks...
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.1134 | The only tradition is $$$$$$ | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Aug 10 1992 13:34 | 24 | 
|  |     -1
    Yeah, I can't see it happening either, but for the Tampa group, what's
    the difference between one team over another? Seems to me that the
    "value" in a baseball team comes from things like being a large market
    team (with a big local TV contract), being a "traditional team" like
    the Red Sox and Fenway Park, etc., or being a successful team on the
    field (for the short run, since this changes all the time). By moving
    to a dome in the Sunbelt, the Red Sox would immediately lose all
    "traditional" value; they would be the AL's Astros.
    
    With a lot of these cities that have become border-line big league in
    the last 20 years, they would be happy with any MLB team. Did the folks
    in Indy care that the Dolts sip? No, becsue they are now OUR Colts, and
    that makes Indian-no-place that much more of a major league city. St
    Pete would have been happy with the White Sox of Mariners, so what do
    they care if they get the Brewers and if the Giants go to Milwaukee? Way
    hypothetical, of course, and I know it won't happen. As for the NL
    wanting the lurative market in Florida, good point. But it effectively
    makes the entire Southeast NL country, where the AL doesn't have a
    frachies between Baltimore, Texas and Kansas City. Likewise, the NL
    will only have only the Colorado Rockies between St Louis/Chicago and LA, 
    where the AL will have several teams.
    
    Tom      
 | 
| 3.1135 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Aug 10 1992 13:36 | 12 | 
|  |     I'll echo what Glenn said about the Stick and in fact, I'd take most of
    it over Fenway Park.  It's more accessable driving, it's newer and it's
    right next to the ocean.  It has no subway going nearby but it's got
    lots of bus service coming out of SF and plenty of parking.  I liked
    the Stick.
    
    I don't really understand why the Giants felt they had to move either.
    
    I think a big part of the problem was that the Bay Area market probably
    couldn't support two teams for any length of time.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1136 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Aug 10 1992 14:43 | 14 | 
|  |     
    re a few back from Glenn,
    
    I bleieve the Giants only drew 2 mil one year, and that was
    during/immediately after a pennant year.  Although their fans enjoyed
    mocking the A's and their fans, they didn't support the team as well as
    the A's' (that'll throw Hendry into a lather) fans did.  I also think
    they had too much competition from the other attractions of the Bay
    Area.  THere is simply so much to do there that baseball drops down on
    the list.
    
    Brews 
    
    
 | 
| 3.1137 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Aug 10 1992 15:11 | 8 | 
|  |     I'm pretty mellow about apostrophes now.  Actually, if I were writing
    it, I'd have written "... the Oakland fans ..." which solves the
    problem cleanly and neatly.
    
    A little bit wordier but also correct would have been " ... the fans of
    the Athletics..."
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1138 | Of course if the Giants move the A's become a big-market team | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Aug 10 1992 15:12 | 31 | 
|  | 
    > I bleieve the Giants only drew 2 mil one year, and that was
    > during/immediately after a pennant year.  Although their fans enjoyed
    > mocking the A's and their fans, they didn't support the team as well as
    > the A's' (that'll throw Hendry into a lather) fans did.  I also think
    > they had too much competition from the other attractions of the Bay
    > Area.  THere is simply so much to do there that baseball drops down on
    > the list.
    
    But Brews, can you tell us what the A's attendance was like before they
    became a powerhouse?  Do you remember 1980 when the A's set some kind
    of a modern-day record for woeful support, with less than a half million 
    fans?  Ten years ago it was the A's who were in dire straits, and both 
    these teams have taken turns over the years flirting with the fateful 
    move.  Maybe the area can't support more than one team, but it's my 
    contention that when you factor in the relative successes of the teams 
    (anyone can support a winner, except maybe Pittsburgh, alas) the Giants 
    have been supported as well as and probably better than the A's.  Of
    course Bob Lurie has never been a Walter Haas Jr. when it comes to
    surrounding himself with good baseball people, the Giants have not been 
    able to match the A's on the field, and good intentions don't pay the
    bills.  
    
    My question is whether the survival of all the small-market teams will 
    depend on their performance over short stretches (hell, the Giants just 
    won the pennant three years ago but have since collapsed on the field). 
    Sports can't work that way, because half the teams are always going to
    be losers...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1139 | Not as big a market as originally thought | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Aug 10 1992 15:23 | 13 | 
|  |     The Giants were the only team in the area until 1968. The A's had some
    really good teams in the early '70s and won a division as late as 1975.
    The Giants were not doing so hot, and were well on their way to becoming 
    the "Toronto Giants" around 1975 or so. The A's hit the bottom after
    most of their stars were traded or left via free agency, and Marvin
    Davis was just about to move them to Denver. They have rebounded and
    become one of the top franchises, while the Giants have dipped from
    their 1989 team.
    
    It seems to me that one or the other has been in trouble most of the
    time. Maybe the area really CAN only support one team...
    
    Tom 
 | 
| 3.1140 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Aug 10 1992 15:30 | 14 | 
|  |     re ':  But I enjoyed the challenge of being able to [correctly] type 
    "A's'."  And you lent me another opportunity.  8^)
    
    re Giants-A's: I believe the A's drew well in '87 (more than 2 mil) and
    possibly even back to '85, as the team was getting put together. 
    Clearly the A's have had the better baseball people (i.e. Sandy
    Alderson), which has led to their success on and off the field.  Also,
    keep in mind that the major population center of the area is closer to
    Candlestick and there is more $ on that side of the Bay.  Of
    course, if T was still here I'd say it was all due to LaRussa amd
    McGwire.  8^) 
    
    Brews
      
 | 
| 3.1141 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Aug 10 1992 16:32 | 5 | 
|  |     The A's drew very badly in 1972-1974 when they were winning 3 WS in a
    row.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1142 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Aug 10 1992 16:40 | 1 | 
|  |     ...and had one of the worst owners in the history of MLB.
 | 
| 3.1143 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Aug 10 1992 17:10 | 1 | 
|  |     Surely you aren't referring to Charlie Finley, are you Brews?
 | 
| 3.1144 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Aug 11 1992 07:58 | 5 | 
|  |        Glenn, you don't actually consider SF a 'small market' do you? They
    draw off of a pretty big area out there. So. Bay, East Bay, Marin
    County, Santa Cruz etc. There may be 2 teams but they're in different
    leagues.
                                        Denny
 | 
| 3.1145 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Tue Aug 11 1992 08:26 | 10 | 
|  | Heard the mayor of SF is trying to get a group together to keep the Giants
in SF.
I hope it happens, and Tampa/St. Pete, one of those noveau Southern Whore
towns, gets to live with a dome that's home to Ice Capades and tractor pulls.
All these Southern whiney "We want a pro team" towns should just start 
their own league....
JD
 | 
| 3.1146 | 8-) | SHALOT::MEDVID | Seasick, yet still docked | Tue Aug 11 1992 08:46 | 11 | 
|  | >All these Southern whiney "We want a pro team" towns should just start 
>their own league....
    
    As soon as all those northern states stop whining about high taxes and
    cost of living and start their own country.  Meanwhile, the south will
    keep carrying the USA through the recession.
    
    If it weren't for Digital and IBM down here, you'd never know there was
    a recession or a boob in the white house.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1147 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 08:49 | 8 | 
|  |     
    dan'l
    
    I am disappointed in you, forgetting your roots and defending the
    South. What is this world coming to? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1148 | My life is taking roots dahn heyah now | SHALOT::MEDVID | Seasick, yet still docked | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:00 | 13 | 
|  |     
    Give me $1.50 admission to a minor league game where you can sit 10
    rows from the field, watching guys who are worried more about the next
    pitch rather than the next paycheck, talking for a spell with the beer
    man.
    
    I go to more games in a summer in the south than I've ever been to at
    Three Rivers.  
    
    Now pro football is a different matter entirely.  I want an NFL team!
    Whine!  Whine!  Whine!
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1149 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:03 | 18 | 
|  | Whoa, whoa people!
Let's not forget that while we all may be proud of where we came from,
or where we're living, we're all still on big ol' country (with a boob
in the White House 8^))
This is not meant to disparage noters in here who don't live in the USA,
it's just to keep the war between the states from erupting again.....
Personally, I've never been to Florida.  I don't know what the folks
are like, but if they're anything like the folks I met in South Carolina,
or the people I know from Alabama or Louisiana, then they're okay.
If they're not, well, hell, let 'em start their own league!  8^)
Chainsaw for Frank_the_Moderator
 | 
| 3.1150 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:05 | 17 | 
|  | >    Give me $1.50 admission to a minor league game where you can sit 10
>    rows from the field, watching guys who are worried more about the next
>    pitch rather than the next paycheck, talking for a spell with the beer
>    man.
    
YOu get the tickets, I'll start driving NOW.
I hear you buddy.  With the New Britain Red Sox just a little ways away
(and a slightly higher ticket price) I know exactly where you are coming
from.
To see a bunch of players playing their heart out trying to make it to
The Show is, IMO, some of the BEST baseball you can see......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1151 | Compare revenues minus gate receipts and it's small... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:13 | 16 | 
|  |     
    > Glenn, you don't actually consider SF a 'small market' do you? They
    > draw off of a pretty big area out there. So. Bay, East Bay, Marin
    > County, Santa Cruz etc. There may be 2 teams but they're in different
    > leagues.
    
    It's hard to come up with an all-encompassing definition of "small
    market", but as far as baseball economics are concerned, the Bay Area 
    (with two teams in it) is definitely one of them.  Both teams have lousy
    TV deals, for starters.  One thing that surprised me when I was out
    there was that even if you have pay cable you can't be guaranteed that
    a particular game will be on the tube, something that's unheard of in
    Boston, New York, Chicago...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1152 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:38 | 17 | 
|  |     re: Minor League Baseball
    
    I know just what you mean. I was in the Niagra Falls area last week and
    saw two games, one at Skydome and one at Pilot Field in Buffalo. While
    Skydomw was impressive (the roof opened while we were there), I
    prefered the Bisons/Nashville Sounds game to the Blue Jays/Yankees
    game. The park is much more intimate (you can see the game without
    binoculars) and the players are nicer to my kids. The players in the
    minors will actually talk to the kids and give autographs, something
    that the big leaguers seldom do. Also, the stadiums have much more
    character and give me the feeling of being a safer place for my kids.
    The only big league park with the same kind of feel that I've been to
    are Wrigley Field and Camden Yards. I'd prefer going to Reading Stadium
    or Duncan Park Stadium (Spartanburg) to watch those versions of the
    Phillies that go to the Vet, which is a concrete toilet bowl.
    
    Dennisf 
 | 
| 3.1153 | Too bad T isn't here to learn a lesson | SHALOT::MEDVID | Seasick, yet still docked | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:50 | 13 | 
|  |     BTW, this debate never should have errupted.  I should have pointed out
    a fundamental error in JD's note...
    
    Florida is not considered "the south."  It's kind of it's own little
    world below its panhandle.  Only by geographical rules is it "the
    south" but it is far far different when it comes to people, way of
    life, and attitude.
    
    Now if the Giants do move to Florida, I suggest they change their name
    to the St. Pete Polyesters.  You could probably buy white leather belts
    and shoes, and plastic nose covers at the souvenier stand.
    
    	--dan'l
 | 
| 3.1154 | Whole lotsa folk got forebears that're Rebs | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 11 1992 09:59 | 6 | 
|  |     Oh I dunno dan'l,
    I'll give ya South Florida, but say that to anyone mid-state and up,
    and you're liable to start an internecine southron war.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1155 | Miami is at least the native Cubans' team... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Aug 11 1992 10:48 | 6 | 
|  |     
    Tampa/St Pete certainly qualifies under "transplanted northerners"
    country.  Prob'ly worse than south Florida, even...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1156 | local affliction | HBAHBA::HAAS | Head down Frogman | Tue Aug 11 1992 10:50 | 6 | 
|  | >    Tampa/St Pete certainly qualifies under "transplanted northerners"
>    country.  Prob'ly worse than south Florida, even...
Hail, we got that problem here in Charlotte... 
TTom
 | 
| 3.1157 | HAHAHAHA TTom | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Aug 11 1992 11:16 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1158 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Jack Clark: Will DH for food | Tue Aug 11 1992 11:17 | 8 | 
|  |     
    The South shall rise again!
    
    
    Eh, maybe not.
    
    Dickstah
       
 | 
| 3.1159 | great p-name Dickstah! | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Aug 11 1992 11:22 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1160 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:07 | 17 | 
|  | Dan'l -
I'm sure real southerners don't consider the noveau-riche, transplanted
northerners living in areas like RTP as the real south, either.   
Anyway, I have no compassion for these cities that build a stadium, and then
like a cheap harlot open their kimono, trying to lure anyone with a pro
team to their lair.
Tampa/St. Pete will get on the casting couch with anyone to try and get a 
team.
They didn't get an expansion team, so they are being whiney little brats.  
Tough crap.   Let the SunCoast Dome or whatever it is turn into a geriatrics
batting cage for all I care.
JD
 | 
| 3.1161 | Big price for a part-time facility | SALES::THILL |  | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:15 | 22 | 
|  |     Just to get back on track, the whole issue here is that St Pete built
    the dome a few years ago when they thought they were going to get the
    White Sox, tried to get the Mariners, and now the Giants. They don't
    care which MLB team it is as long as it is A_team. BTW, can anyone say
    for sure that this is a done deal? People in SF are still trying to
    hang on, but is it considered fait acompli cuz Vincent outlined
    criteria for franchise moves, and the Giants meet them? 
    
    The dome is a huge white elephant. There are only so many tractor pulls
    and concerts they can stage there. With the Bucs playing in perfectly
    adequate (and larger) Tampa Stadium, no way they'd get them as a
    tennant either. I dunno if the NHL's Lightning will be playing there,
    but they better learn how to make an adequate ice surface if they do. 
    Maybe the Orlando Magic could be presuaded to have a few (exhibition) 
    games there as well.
    
    Too bad for the taxpayers of the Tampa/St.Pete area, but I guess that's
    the price for wanting so desperately to be a "big league" city. For
    every Tampa Bay there's 10 other major league wannabee cities. Where
    does it stop?
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1162 | Bob Hunt, too | HBAHBA::HAAS | Head down Frogman | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:22 | 11 | 
|  | >Dan'l -
>
>I'm sure real southerners don't consider the noveau-riche, transplanted
>northerners living in areas like RTP as the real south, either.   
JD,
Whatcha asking Dan'l for? He ain't no southerner. I don't know about the
noveau or the riche part but he definitely a transplant.
TTom
 | 
| 3.1163 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:23 | 5 | 
|  |     JD, I'm surprised you are/were a Mariner supporter.  Afterall, Seattle
    was a noveau big league wannabe city at one time.  In fact, they showed
    they couldn't hack it, the team moved out,  so they threatened to sue
    MLB unless they were awarded an expansion franchise the next time
    around.
 | 
| 3.1164 | Ouch | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:27 | 29 | 
|  |  � Anyway, I have no compassion for these cities that build a stadium, and
 � then like a cheap harlot open their kimono, trying to lure anyone with a
 � pro team to their lair.
 
 That's a bit harsh, don'tcha think, JD ???   I mean suppose you was out
 looking for a job (as many of us here in OPA may very well soon be doing). 
 You'd buy a new suit, get a haircut, get da shoes shined, polish up the
 ol' resume, and then you'd do your best to make the best impression you
 could with the companies you'd like to work for.
 
 St Pete simply took the initiative in making themselves look good to
 *anyone* looking to move (or start) a pro baseball team.   And they have
 succeeded ...  They've looked good to the Chisox, the Mariners, the
 expansion committee, and now the Jints.    They haven't looked good enough
 until now but they've made no secret of the fact that that's what they've
 been trying to do.
 
 I would have a *lot* of compassion for St Pete if it turns out that Lurie
 was just trying to use them to arm-twist Frisco into bending over for him. 
 If the Jints get a sweetheart deal and stay in the Bay Area, the wailing
 from St Pete will be noisy and somewhat justified.
 
 You are right that they made a business decision to build the Sun Coast
 Dome and that it could backfire in their faces and you're right that they
 don't deserve compassion along a business line.   But I don't think they
 were total whores in this venture any more than you or I wouldn't be if we
 tried to sell ourselves and our skills and services.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1165 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Aug 11 1992 12:54 | 8 | 
|  |     Anyone else catch Ken Patterson's wild pitch in yesterday's Cubs-Expos
    game?
    
    For those who didn't see it, he threw a pitch way high and outside
    while *intentionally walking* Spike Owen!!!  
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1167 | Tampa Bay is already sick of the Buccaneers... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Aug 11 1992 13:11 | 27 | 
|  |     
> You are right that they made a business decision to build the Sun Coast
> Dome and that it could backfire in their faces and you're right that they
> don't deserve compassion along a business line.   But I don't think they
> were total whores in this venture any more than you or I wouldn't be if we
> tried to sell ourselves and our skills and services.
    
    This analogy only works if you truly believe that there is absolutely
    nothing special about baseball, that it is exclusively a business and is
    subject to all the same forces as any other business, that there is no
    premium placed on fan loyalty or tradition and the identification of an
    individual team with an individual city.  That's a legitimate point of 
    view to take; it's just one that I don't particularly agree with, being 
    an ex-Baltimore Colts fan (are the Colts and the NFL really better off 
    now with the team in Indy?-- I for one can strongly identify with the 
    prostitution metaphor, starring Bob Irsay as chief pimp on the block).
    
    Taking the business argument one further, it might make financial sense
    to rotate franchises around the country based on the short-term
    economic conditions.  The team is going poorly in one city, and an
    artificial economic boost is needed?  Move the team down the road and
    rake it in for five years or so, and when that city gets sick of the
    team, pack it up and move on again... 
    
    glenn                                
    
    
 | 
| 3.1168 |  | MIMS::ROLLINS_R |  | Tue Aug 11 1992 13:38 | 9 | 
|  | >    Taking the business argument one further, it might make financial sense
>    to rotate franchises around the country based on the short-term
>    economic conditions.  The team is going poorly in one city, and an
>    artificial economic boost is needed?  Move the team down the road and
>    rake it in for five years or so, and when that city gets sick of the
>    team, pack it up and move on again... 
    
     And what is wrong with this idea, if that is what the ownership decides
     to do, and that is what the market demands be done ?
 | 
| 3.1169 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:49 | 7 | 
|  | Bob -
St Pete tried for a franchise (expansion), I believe.  They didn't get one.
So ever since then, they've been willing to go to bed with anyone that
vaguely sniffs of money.
JD
 | 
| 3.1170 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:58 | 9 | 
|  |     JD
    
    If they were willing to take an expansion team then why shouldn't
    they go after an established team. Who says that San Francisco has a
    god given right to a baseball team.  And about going after everone who
    vaguely sniffs of money, I think you have that reversed, TB is the one
    giving the money - more or less.
    
    The Crazy Met
 | 
| 3.1171 | It's called "capitalism", amigo | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:50 | 13 | 
|  | � So ever since then, they've been willing to go to bed with anyone that
� vaguely sniffs of money.
 
 So what ???   What do you call our "courtship dance" with Microsoft ???  
 We have the networking technologies they want and they have the customer
 base we want.   It's a classic case of two corporate "whores" doing it in
 every single position they can think of in every room in the house.
 
 St Pete's got a new stadium.   The Jints want it.   Bingo.   Doesn't
 matter who's the tart and who's the trick.   They're both selling their
 bodies.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1172 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 08:19 | 17 | 
|  | Boy, you guys sure have 'warm and fuzzy' feelings.
Face it, they are acting like spoiled brats.  They LOST at their chance.  And
they've snapped.
They are like the old trenchcoat-clad old man, in one hand a bag of money
that it throws like bread to seagulls, hoping one gets close enough to snag
for dinner, and in the other hand, a bag of money like candy, the better to
entice a poor youngin' into the woods.
Nah, this isn't like us with Microsoft, or like folks with resumes and suits.
This is a city acting like a baby.
Then again, it already has the mindset of the perfect modern-day ballplayer -
whiney, money-grubbing, no loyalty.  So perhaps its a perfect fit.
JD
 | 
| 3.1173 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 12 1992 08:23 | 15 | 
|  | > So what ???   What do you call our "courtship dance" with Microsoft ???  
> We have the networking technologies they want and they have the customer
> base we want.   It's a classic case of two corporate "whores" doing it in
> every single position they can think of in every room in the house.
 
Gee, I'd like to do a little gushing over the importance of courtship
rituals in the social development of Man, but the first thing that came
to mind was
	"Wow, an electronic Kama Sutra"
8^)
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1174 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 09:33 | 6 | 
|  | �Face it, they are acting like spoiled brats.  They LOST at their chance.  And
�they've snapped.
    
    
    No, spoiled brats would have tried to sue MLB for not awarding them an
    expansion franchise.
 | 
| 3.1175 | could happen... | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 09:37 | 3 | 
|  |     We all know the world would end should the Cubbies ever meet the Red
    Sox in the World Series, but what would happen should the World Series
    be held entirely in Canada?
 | 
| 3.1176 |  | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 12 1992 10:23 | 10 | 
|  |     If they're going to be consistent, they shouldn't play the Star
    Spangled Banner at all since those will be both Canadian teams.  No one
    in MLB plays O Canada when either the Expos or Jays are not there.  No
    NHL team in Canada plays the Star Spangled Banner when it's an
    all-Canadian matchup.  The only US NHL city that plays O Canada when
    there's not a Canadian team playing is Buffalo.
    
    I'm dead serious on this one.  O Canada only pregame.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1177 |  | CSOA1::BACH | You are so sly, but so am I... | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:02 | 1 | 
|  |     Makes sense to me.
 | 
| 3.1178 | Gotta live in the real world though! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:15 | 3 | 
|  |        Money grubbing athletes, money grubbing owners, money grubbing
    cities!! Ah, to be as young and innocent as JD!
                                      Denny
 | 
| 3.1179 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:18 | 4 | 
|  |     Denny you only want to be as young as JD because of your advanced age.
    
    The Crayz Met
    
 | 
| 3.1180 | Money, money, money ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:30 | 24 | 
|  |  � Face it, they are acting like spoiled brats.  They LOST at their chance. 
 � And they've snapped.
 � This is a city acting like a baby.
 
 What would you have them do differently, JD ???  Hold afternoon tea
 parties at the country club ???   Send out engraved invitations to the
 debuntante ball ???
 
   "Oh, Dear Mr Lurie, we couldn't possibly be interested in your baseball
   team in San Francisco.  Thank you so much for asking us about bringing
   your team to our unused Sun Coast Dome but we really must take into
   consideration the fans of San Francisco who truly deserve a major league
   baseball team with the history and tradition of your Giants.   
 
   Therefore, we politely decline.   We will just have to sit here and
   suffer with our completely bone-headed decision to build our Dome.  
   What could we possibly have been thinking about when our taxpayers voted
   for us to build it and then get them a team ???   Weren't we the silly
   ones ???" 
 
 C'mon, JD, this is business, baby.  Ain't never been nuthin' else.
 
 Bob Hunt
 | 
| 3.1181 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:34 | 7 | 
|  |  >   Denny you only want to be as young as JD because of your advanced age.
 >   
 >   The Crayz Met
      
    Yeah, well that too craze. 
    It's just that JD seems to be whining about the whiners lately.
                               Denny
 | 
| 3.1182 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:58 | 11 | 
|  | Bob -
Actually, all I hope is that Tampa/St Pete NEVER gets a team.  Ever.  Be the
funniest thing in the world.  I understand business.  I just wish they'd
stop smooching with everyone, shut up, and bid on the next franchise.  Maybe
they should try to get something the population would enjoy - like a 
pro shuffleboard team.
Personally, I hope any city that builds a stadium without a team falls flat
on its face.   Nothing gives me a thigh shudderer than that.
JD
 | 
| 3.1183 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:05 | 1 | 
|  | "If you build it, they will come"
 | 
| 3.1184 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:12 | 18 | 
|  | �I just wish they'd
�stop smooching with everyone, shut up, and bid on the next franchise.  
    
    They did and got the Giants.
    
�Maybe
�they should try to get something the population would enjoy - like a 
�pro shuffleboard team.
    
    This from the guy who goes ballistic when someone starts making
    statements with a broad brush about team's fans.  If anything,
    Floridians deserve an ML team simply because of the support they show
    for the Grapefruit Leagues in the spring.
    
�Personally, I hope any city that builds a stadium without a team falls flat
�on its face.   
    
    Howcum you didn't feel that way about the Mariners?
 | 
| 3.1185 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:38 | 19 | 
|  | Mac,
First off, Florida has a baseball team. The Marlins.  St Pete lost out, and
they are doing something I guess you value.  Oh, and last time I looked, the
Giants aren't an expansion team, which is what I meant about bidding on the
next franchise.
I doubt you'd have the same attitude if it was the Sox who were being wooed
by this tawdry sireen of  the south.
The Mariners were a long time ago.  I don't know the whole story, and I'm
not a Mariners fan. Sure, I followed them out of closeness, but I haven't 
watched or paid attention to them since I left Seattle.  The fact they have
a dumb dome doesn't enamor them to me.
So Mac.  You seem like an honorable dude.  What's the great honorable thing
Tampa St. Bleat is doing?
JD
 | 
| 3.1186 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:49 | 18 | 
|  | �First off, Florida has a baseball team. The Marlins.  
    
    So what?  New York City has 2.  Chicago has 2.  California had 4.  I
    don't think there are rules that say 1 franchise per x/square miles.
    
�I doubt you'd have the same attitude if it was the Sox who were being wooed
�by this tawdry sireen of  the south.
    
    The Pats were beeing wooed by other cities.  The owner-dejour had
    similar reasons to accept those offers and I really couldn't blame him
    if he ended up taking them.  I'd be upset that I didn't have a local
    team to root for anymore and would hope I'd get one back.
    
�So Mac.  You seem like an honorable dude.  What's the great honorable thing
�Tampa St. Bleat is doing?
    
    They are fullfilling their promise to their taxpayers/citizens.  They
    are getting them a major league team.
 | 
| 3.1187 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:52 | 7 | 
|  |     JD 
    
    The heck with honorable. The real question is what are they doing that
    is so dishonorable??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1188 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:07 | 11 | 
|  | TCM -
They are being babies.  They aren't accepting that they weren't GOOD enough
to get a team awarded to them via the normal channels - expansion.  
Tampa St. Bleat is like the spoilt rich kid who tries to buy friends with
his daddies money, but gets rejected after the intial contact, when its realized
that this snotty-nosed brat is nothing more than a shallow sore on the face
mankind.
JD
 | 
| 3.1189 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:12 | 7 | 
|  |     Tampa Bay went after a team before the expansion process, see Mariners
    and White Sox. They did not get an expansion team because the NL
    decided that at the time Miami and Denver better fit their plans.
    Basically you are saying if you don't get something you want the first
    time around then quit trying. Maybe you do that JD, most of us don't.
    
    The Crazy Met
 | 
| 3.1190 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:13 | 9 | 
|  | �They are being babies.  They aren't accepting that they weren't GOOD enough
�to get a team awarded to them via the normal channels - expansion.  
    
    Then if you look at the flipside, the SF folks are also whining babies
    because they weren't good enough to keep a team through the normal
    channels -- good facilities, fan support and local TV/radio contracts.
    
    Sorry JD, looks like you're alone on this one.  BTW, what was your
    stance on "Moochie" Matt?
 | 
| 3.1191 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:14 | 4 | 
|  |        what is this aversion liberals have to anyone making money!!? Since
    when is everyone a charitable outfit? You're whining more than they did
    JD.
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.1192 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:18 | 10 | 
|  | Boy, you KNOW that the sports world has to be in that utterly boring
August phase (too far past the all-star game, the series is a ways away,
and football ain't started yet), if all we can come up with in here
for debate is whether or not Tampa is okay for wanting the Giants......
It's a SAD day in SPORTS.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1193 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:20 | 2 | 
|  |        Nah, it's a NORMAL day in SPORTS!!
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.1194 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:30 | 9 | 
|  | Denny -
First off, I have absolutely no idea where the liberals/money thing came from.
I have yet to mention, in any note, that it is bad to make money.  Never.
Bark up another tree.
JD
 | 
| 3.1195 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:34 | 18 | 
|  | TCM -
I'm not saying you should give up after the first try.  If I was that sort
of person, I never would have run track in high school or college.  
I just don't agree with Sleazy Cities going after established franchises 
because they are wanna-be's.  It's a pretty yuppie thing to do, which is
why I suspect everyone in here is so into it.
So I guess that all that really matters is if a city has a money, builds a
stadium, then they have the right to get a pro franchise no matter what.  
Personally, I hope LUrie loses, the Giants stay, athe St. Bleaters go slithering
down another alley, going from gin mill to gin mill, waving their smelly wares
in the face of greasy owners looking for a cheap thrill.  And in the end, all
I hope is St. Bleat gets a nice big open sore that seeps through its overcoat.
JD
 | 
| 3.1196 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:35 | 3 | 
|  |        This whole thing's about money. That's the basic reason SF is
    moving.
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.1197 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:36 | 6 | 
|  | But Denny, why do you assume that people that you have a need to label 
with a stereotype like Liberal, don't want to make money.  Hell, I know
many of those you would label that way who are savvy business folks and
make it hand over fist.
JD
 | 
| 3.1198 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:38 | 14 | 
|  | >     <<< Note 3.1169 by CUPMK::DEVLIN "Je voudrais boire quelque chose." >>>
>
>Bob -
>
>St Pete tried for a franchise (expansion), I believe.  They didn't get one.
>So ever since then, they've been willing to go to bed with anyone that
>vaguely sniffs of money.
>
>JD
     
    What's that you said a couple notes back JD? Are you going to make me
    look for others or is this enough?
                               Denny
     
 | 
| 3.1199 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:39 | 16 | 
|  |     JD,
    
    Let me get this straight, you are saying either:
    
    1) Lurie should be thankful he can own a Major League baseball team.
    Since he is so priviliged how dare he seek to find a stadium that is
    a reasonable place to play baseball.
    
    or (I hope)
    
    2) Lurie has a right to sell his team even if it will be moved, as long
    as he does not sell it to a group that will move it to Tampa Bay. If
    they wanted to move the team to Charlotte that would be ok.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1200 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:42 | 8 | 
|  | �I just don't agree with Sleazy Cities going after established franchises 
�because they are wanna-be's.  
    
    JD, they are going after a de-established franchise, or at least a
    franchise that was put on the open market.
    
    If you feel you must BLAM someone, why not Lurie and/or the SF
    fans/area?
 | 
| 3.1201 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:43 | 13 | 
|  | TCM -
Is that what it is really about?  Or is it about Lurie trying to blackmail
the locals into building him a new stadium?  is it about Lurie trying to play
off the suiters to get the best deal for him, and not giving a damn about
SF, TB, the fans or the Giants, themselves?
Is it about St. Bleat playing Suzie Tawdry because they built a vile dome taht
they can't find a team to play in?
Maybe Lurie will pull a Bob Irsay - that should get you all pretty wooden.
JD
 | 
| 3.1202 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:44 | 7 | 
|  | �But Denny, why do you assume that people that you have a need to label 
�with a stereotype like Liberal, don't want to make money.  
    
    For the same reason that you lable Floridians as Shuffleboard fans?
    
    Besides, he didn't say that Liberals didn't want to make money.  He
    said that Liberals didn't like to see other people making money.
 | 
| 3.1203 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:45 | 3 | 
|  |        Obviously if the Giants don't wanna play in SF they shoulda gone out
    of business, or moved to Nashua, because they never begged for a team.
                                    Denny
 | 
| 3.1204 | SF wants to have their cake and eat it too! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:48 | 15 | 
|  |     JD
    
    Look at what is happening in SF now. Lurie finally decided to sell and
    now the folks in SF are falling over themselves to do something to keep
    the Giants in town. Lurie stated that if the Giants have to continue
    playing at Candlestick then they will leave town. The people out in the
    SF Bay area did a cost/benefit analysis and decided that it would be
    less costly for them to lose the Giants then to somehow figure out a
    way to get a new stadium built. For the moment I am giving Lurie the
    benefit of the doubt. If it becomes clear that he is using this TB
    thing as a bargaining chip I will then consider him to be a real sleazy
    businessman.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1205 | Surely not a first | CTHQ::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:50 | 15 | 
|  |     Can anyone draw some relevant parallels if any/
    
    What about these moves
    
    Philadelphia A's to KC
    St. Loius Browns to Baltimore (Orioles)
    Chicago Cardinals to St.Louis to Phoenix
    Syracuse Nats to Philly to SF Warriors
    
    ETC.
    
    Are these situations so dissimilar to St.Pete/SF?/
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1206 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:52 | 7 | 
|  | Mac -
I'd hope even you would see a vein of humour in the shuffleboard line.
And I stand on my stance concerning Denny's line.
JD
 | 
| 3.1207 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 14:56 | 9 | 
|  |     re: .1205
    
    I'm a bit fuzzy on the move of the footbal St. Louis Cardinals to
    Phoenix but it certainly had to do with fan support, stadium terms, and
    stuff like that. Similar to Giantsmove but Giants probably have gotten
    more fan support.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1208 |  | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | I brake for tailgaters | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:03 | 8 | 
|  |     JD, yuppies in St. Pete?
    
    Har-har....
    
    "Yo Biff, please be a sport and pass me some of that pureed banana and
    try not to tear your depends on my new wheelchair."
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.1209 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:05 | 2 | 
|  |        Lufay's right, all the Yups are down so. watchin' the 'canes!
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.1210 |  | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | I brake for tailgaters | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:14 | 3 | 
|  |     Denny....
    
    oD em!
 | 
| 3.1211 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:32 | 5 | 
|  | �I'd hope even you would see a vein of humour in the shuffleboard line.
    
    
    My mistake.  I guess I was confused by the "money grubbing prostitute
    sleaze bag" stuff before it.
 | 
| 3.1212 | Tampa/St. Bleat?  Rollward! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:35 | 32 | 
|  |                                   
    JD's not alone in this.  Some things, including stability and tradition
    in baseball, should be above the short-term bucks.  I know that's not
    being realistic with our society as it is today; I admit to that.  No 
    one ever said that we baseball idealists have to agree with something 
    just because it's so.
    
    I've already seen Spud write in the BASEBALL conference that if it
    weren't for some local businessmen artificially supporting the Twins to
    protect their investment in the Metrodome they were gone in the early
    80's, and we look up and now they're one of the more successful
    franchises going.  The Chicago White Sox were headed out, which would
    have been an absolute travesty, but now they're fine (yes, I know, it
    took capitulation to one of the greediest ownerships in the history of 
    sports to accomplish this).  
    
    Seems to me that even fans of a franchise as mighty as the New York Mets 
    would have had no complaint if the team had packed it up and moved out 
    about ten years ago, citing these wholesome and meritorious "economic 
    conditions".  After all, they were playing in a lousy stadium, in front 
    of piddling non-supportive crowds of around 5000 fans, in a city that 
    was broke and which had no desire to accomodate ownership.  So what if 
    that ownership was imcompetent and cheap and stupid enough to trade 
    away the only real legend in franchise history for a bag of beans.  
    Those ingrate Mets fans *proved* that they didn't deserve a team because
    the owners couldn't make a buck.
    
    Look at the lowest point in your own team's history and see if you're
    as sympathetic to a potential franchise move...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1213 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:38 | 4 | 
|  | �    JD's not alone in this.  
    
    Well Glenn, based on your reply, I'd say he is.  Do you blame Indy for
    the Colts move from Baltimore?  
 | 
| 3.1214 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:41 | 8 | 
|  | Mac -
But I agree with Glenn.  So what do you know?
If teh St. Bleaters don't get the Giants, what franchise is next in their
"Land A Franchise Lambada?"
JD
 | 
| 3.1215 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:42 | 3 | 
|  | Po' JD!
 | 
| 3.1216 | They sure didn't care about NFL rules or Maryland court orders... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:45 | 14 | 
|  |     
>�    JD's not alone in this.  
    
 >   Well Glenn, based on your reply, I'd say he is.  Do you blame Indy for
 >   the Colts move from Baltimore?  
    
    Absolutely!  For part of it, not all of it.  What would you call a city
    dumb enough not to see through Bob Irsay's chicanery, and which is paying
    for the sweetheart deal they made to this day in the form of lousy teams 
    and below-capacity crowds?  I'd say they were duped at best, and 
    malevolent at worst...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1217 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:53 | 5 | 
|  | �But I agree with Glenn.  So what do you know?
    
    I know I'm confused.  You appear to be blaming Tampa/St.Pete.  Glenn
    appears to be blaming Lurie/SF.  The only thing you both seem to be
    agreeing to is that the Giants should stay in SF.
 | 
| 3.1218 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:05 | 24 | 
|  |     re: .1212
    
    Back in the doldrum days of the late 1970's and very early 1980's you
    are absolutely right about the Mets. I am sympathetic to the Giants
    fans. But all these last ditch efforts to keep the Giants in town is
    the real cynical part around this whole move. It appears the people in
    SF simply did not believe a very straight forward statement: If
    Candlestick is the place where the Giants have to play then the team
    will be sold and bidders from outside the area will be seriously
    considered. Now they are faced with reality and don't like it.
    Only reason the White Sox and Twins stayed was because their demands
    were met. The Giants demands were not met, and they people in the area
    were given many chances. I am not taking sides whether or not the
    people in the area did or did not do the right thing. But they made a
    choice and now they don't want to live with it.
    
    re: stability and tradition
    
    That ended when the Dodgers and Giants dumped on NY and headed out to
    California. Now the shoe is on the other foot and these same folks are
    yelling bloody murder.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1219 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:06 | 12 | 
|  | M ac -
There's plenty of blame to go around.  But Tampa/St. Bleat is starting to 
be like a tired old Hooker.  Everytime you drive down the street, there
she is, all made up with glossy makeup and support pantyhose, trying to
get someone to take a peak under her dome.  And just as Jeff Smulyan before 
him, Lurie deserves some blame.  But the prescense of a St.Bleat, which will
spread em with ease, makes it that much easier for a Lurie to run away, pointing
a finger at the present hometown, while pointing in a different manner 
towards the geritol gams of The Bleat-town.
JD
 | 
| 3.1220 |  | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | I brake for tailgaters | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:13 | 3 | 
|  |     Leave Gams out of this!
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.1221 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:21 | 11 | 
|  |     
    I think the people of the Bay Area believed Lurie from the beginning,
    understood his problem, but in general, felt there are bigger things to
    worry about, so they are saying "adios!"  The people complaining are in
    the vast minority, and few are holding Lurie to blame, wh has done
    everything he can to keepp the team in SF (including buying it).
    
    JD's metaphors are getting tiresome.  At least T's were original and
    reasonably on target.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1222 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:26 | 3 | 
|  |        Rat on Brews, at least T's hookers had festering sores. JD's are
    just whiney.
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.1223 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:42 | 13 | 
|  | �But the prescense of a St.Bleat, which will
�spread em with ease, makes it that much easier for a Lurie to run away, pointing
�a finger at the present hometown, while pointing in a different manner 
�towards the geritol gams of The Bleat-town.
    
    And why does St. Petersberg have that dome to begin with?  Because they
    wanted to attract one of the expansion clubs.  They took a gamble and
    hoped that the fact that they had a facility ready to move into would
    sway the commish and the other NL owners.  But in the end they lost out
    to a city that didn't even have a real baseball park yet.
    
    Now that they lost out on a chance to get a team, what do you want them
    to do, tear down the ballpark?
 | 
| 3.1224 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:45 | 6 | 
|  | Speaking of festering sores, is that particular gem in THIS notesfile?
I'd love to pull that baby for posterity......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1225 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Mmmmmmm, Doughnuts. | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:16 | 19 | 
|  | 
Personally I think that any team that is for sale should have a 3 month window 
where they are available for local ownership only. If local ownership can not
be found in that time period then they can consider moving to another town 
under present ownership or selling to ownership that would move them.
Would Lurie be doing this if Tampa / Saint Pete weren't already prepared to
welcome him with open arms? If they didn't have a vacant dome wasting away
would the area be so quick to solicit other teams?
How much would it cost to build an adequate stadium for the Giants? I'm not 
talking 9th wonder of the world like Skydome or such like. Just a nice outdoor
stadium seating 40 to 45K or so. How much did Camden Yards cost to build?
I think Tampa made a big mistake putting the cart before the horse and now
they are trying to avoid running over the cart with the horse by soliciting
any and all teams to come out there...
Metz
 | 
| 3.1226 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:33 | 3 | 
|  |     
    Lurie gave Sf much more than 90 days.  He's given them at least 5-6
    years.
 | 
| 3.1227 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:34 | 10 | 
|  |     re: .1225
    
    That is a pretty good idea. It nicely balances the interests of the
    local fans and the owner.
    
    I suspect that Lurie would be doing this no matter what, it so happens
    that the Tampa Bay situation makes it easier for him to do.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1228 |  | DECWET::METZGER | Mmmmmmm, Doughnuts. | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:35 | 4 | 
|  | 
Not since he announced the team was for sale...
Metz
 | 
| 3.1229 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:58 | 9 | 
|  |     
    He announced that the team was for sale YEARS ago.  No one local would
    step up and buy it, with the stadium situation the way it is.  After
    the San Jose deal fell threw, he said he'd entertain ALL offers, and
    take the first reasonable one.
    
    
    Brews
    
 | 
| 3.1230 |  | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Thu Aug 13 1992 06:57 | 18 | 
|  |     I don't understand why so many are upset of this situation.
    
    Isn't this the American way?  If someone "owns" something, and then
    decides to either sell or move, or both, and it's happened in every
    major sport, then what's the big deal over this particular situation?
    
    I don't know St. Pete from St. Louis, so the particular location
    doesn't interest or bother me in the least.  Business is business.
    
    Let's also remember that high salaries are the reason that so many
    teams are now in financial straits.  I won't say they are in danger of
    failing, but certainly attendance does have a bigger impact on the
    financial statement that in years past.  TV market is a major issue,
    too.  But, to the owner, it's his investment and the bottom line that
    are, for most owners, the key to any move or sale.  Again, the 'Merican
    way.
    
    Lee
 | 
| 3.1231 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:12 | 26 | 
|  |     
    Well, maybe I should change my stance.  Make the Brews happy.  Make Mac
    happy.
    
    I now think that all the existing franchises should be moved to newer,
    sexier towns. Places that want a pro team and don't have one.
    
    I mean some of these cities have had a team for 50-100 years or more!
    Time for a change.   Let some new places get teams.   It should match
    the rest of America.  Like Lee said.   Have them move from the rust
    belt and the north to the south, teh south west.    Yep.  That's what
    would be great.
    
    Phoenix should have a baseball team.  El Paso.  Memphis.   New Orleans.
    Charlotte.  Raleigh.  Gainsville.   ALbuqueque. Las Vegas.  Sun City.
    Austin.   Mobile.  Little Rock.
    
    It's getting pretty boring having the same teams and cities year in, 
    year out!  San Fran, LA< Boston, Chicago, New York, Philly - BORING!
    
    Yep, that's what should happen. It's the AMerican way.   
    
    And, I didn't use any metaphors, so I can keep poor ol' Brews happy,
    and maybe not tire him.
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.1232 |  | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:32 | 39 | 
|  |     Lurie isn't up and moving the team.  He's selling the team because he
    can't make a profit with it.  While perhaps a semantic difference only,
    I think it's an important distinction to make.
    
    I'm no big fan of team ownership on any level and in fact as you well
    know work for a team whose future in New England is by no means
    guaranteed.  I believe the team is doing everything it can to stay here
    but I certainly don't expect it to stay here if it's not being
    supported.  I don't think any businessman should be forced to stay in
    business if his business isn't being supported.
    
    While I don't believe Candlestick Park is that bad, I think Lurie tried
    everything he could to convince San Francisco and vicinity that he
    needed some help in order to stay.  I believe the team has been losing
    money.  I believe the prospects for losses would be worse in the future
    with the inevitable cutbacks in TV money, without a corresponding boost
    in attendance.  Since the Stick is an important factor in attendance at
    Giants games, a new ballpark was probably necessary.
    
    The folks in the area didn't want to commit their resources to help. 
    The governments didn't show the vision to just do it and get it done
    like Baltimore did.  Lurie probably said to himself "Fine.  I tried
    everything I could.  I'm selling the team and you can take your
    chances."  He was up front about it along.  Local interests, according
    to what I read, rejected the idea of buying the team as well because
    they saw the same situation as he did.
    
    I don't want to get into a LDUC over what St Pete did or didn't do, but
    I certainly don't blame Lurie for wanting to sell the team.  I'm
    saddened to see the Giants leave San Francisco.  San Francisco was the
    first city I got interested in when I was a kid and I became a Giants
    fan once I discovered baseball.  I've become interested in the history
    of the franchise and said if I could travel back in time and see one
    torn-down ballpark, it would have been the Polo Grounds.  Some of this
    attraction will die for me since I have no interest in Tampa/St Pete. 
    I feel bad for the Giants fans who are losing their team but I'm not
    sad for the area as a whole - they made their choice.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1233 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Aug 13 1992 08:45 | 5 | 
|  |        So JD, what was Lurie supposed to do, take a financial bath? And it
    only makes sense that a city that was in contention for a franchise
    should try and get one that is for sale. Would it make more sense if he
    sold the team to somebody in Hartford? 
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.1234 | By law, baseball does *not* operate as normal business! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Aug 13 1992 09:13 | 29 | 
|  |     
    For the record, as I said a while back, I don't blame Bob Lurie or the
    Bay Area for this situation.  I think both parties had their hands tied
    (don't forget, if it hadn't been for an act of God in the form of an
    untimely earthquake, a beautiful new ballpark would be going up in SF's 
    China Basin right now, and we wouldn't be talking about this).  I blame
    major-league baseball for a lack of vision.  No matter how many
    franchise moves take place, when the dust settles a number of years
    later you're not going to have any kind of an equitable economic
    climate between baseball's markets.
    
    Baseball has an antitrust exemption that prohibits *real* free-market
    competition by placing limits on expansion and prohibiting franchise
    moves into certain existing markets.  They claim that this exemption is
    necessary because sports are *not* like any other business and without
    it there could not be competition on the field.  But speaking out of 
    both sides of its mouth, baseball tells smaller markets that if they 
    can't compete, tough crap.  If you're not filling your share of the till 
    at this very moment no matter how far the odds are stacked against you, 
    to hell with the greater good of baseball and move it on out...  
    
    How come everyone was excoriating the Chicago Cubs a couple of weeks
    back for protecting their financial interests in a relatively minor 
    matter, but are now live-and-let-live laissez-fairests when baseball is
    allowing a proud franchise to pack up and move into yet another 
    ridiculous phony-dome for those same greasy greenbacks?
    
    glenn
       
 | 
| 3.1235 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Aug 13 1992 09:53 | 3 | 
|  |     Right on Glenn.    
    
    JD
 | 
| 3.1236 | There's a finite number of teams | SALES::THILL |  | Thu Aug 13 1992 09:55 | 23 | 
|  |     re a few back
    Someone compared the Giants with Baltimore, and how the city built
    Camden Yards. OPCY cost a ton of money, well spent IMO, but still a
    lot. The SF area has a lot of other things, such as earthquake repairs,
    to spend money on. As much as I'd like to see the Giants stay in SF, I
    can't blame the city for saying that a new park is low on the priority
    list, much like when Oakland decided not to give Al Davis $100 million
    to move the Raiders back, when the schools had no money, etc.  
    
    The whole idea of franchises moving so more newer cities can feel good
    about themselves and be considered "big league" isn't going to end. It
    seemed like a good setup with 12 teams in each league, since the
    schedules worked out prety well and each team came to town enough...
    With 14 teams, scheduling is a mess. What's next? 16 teams per league
    so that these AAA cities can now be big league? Probably. There has to
    be a finite number of viable, first tier teams. Perhaps a setup where
    the bottom teams have somethig to lose by finishing last (and something
    to gain - keeping their major league status - by not) would be an
    answer. In 30 years will there be 50 "major league" teams? Play each
    other one series a year, home and away. Sorry, not everyone can be big 
    league....  
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1237 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:23 | 5 | 
|  |     Easy, Glenn.  It doesn't appear that the Cubs will go broke if they
    move to the NL West.  Concessions were being made by other teams to
    accomodate the Cub's wishes to lessen the impact on their SuperStation. 
    By all reports, Lurie would go broke trying to keep the Giants in San
    Francisco.
 | 
| 3.1238 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:29 | 18 | 
|  |     
    Glenn,
    
    I'd have been surprised if the China Basin park would have passed, even
    if there had been no quake.  The people of the city had already voted
    down at least one other proposal, and this one seemed little better. 
    One of the problems in trying to get the park OK'd by the people of the
    City of SF itself, is that a small minority of the fans actually lived
    there.  That was why SJ was where everyone hoped it would pass.  By and
    large, the memories of the quake have faded, also.
    
    
    JD,
    
    I have no problem with methaphors, just the boring ones you've
    plagarized from T.  Make up something original.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1239 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:44 | 8 | 
|  |     Brews,
    
    I though that in 1989 the polls showed that the stadium issue would
    pass. Especially with the A's-Giants WS that year. Then of course came
    the earthquake.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1240 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:50 | 10 | 
|  |     
    If I remember correctly, the Bay ARea wanted the stadium, not the
    people of SF.  The polls were of the entire area.  It's one of the
    problems they have there, as there is no central gov't for the entire
    area (SF is a city and county).  Those polls have also been very
    innaccurate.  I believe they get manipulated (or the people answering
    the polls don't vote) by the press (who want a stadium).  I thought the
    SJ was supposed to pass, and it really wasn't that close.
    
    Brews 
 | 
| 3.1241 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:49 | 12 | 
|  | Brews -
It seems that other than Saw, no one has gotten what I was doing.  Pretty sad.
Any way, to those who keep calling it a business, and the lame comparisons
to DEC, remember Baseball has the good ol' anti-trust exemption.   DEC  can't
use proximity or loss of base if a Sun or Apple or whomever decides to invade
their territory.   Baseball can.  That's why even the subtle threat of repeal -
ala TOm Foley in Washington - quieted the jingoistic reaction to Nintendo's
bid on the Mariners.  
JD
 | 
| 3.1242 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:53 | 4 | 
|  | �It seems that other than Saw, no one has gotten what I was doing.  Pretty sad.
    
    If noone but 'Saw understands/thinks like you, that's pretty sad for
    you indeed.  ;^}
 | 
| 3.1243 | San Fran gets dumped on, but San Jose voters were most adamant | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:58 | 11 | 
|  | 
    Polls aside, the vote on China Basin *was held* in the city of San
    Francisco, shortly after the earthquake, and it's my understanding that 
    the result was the closest of all four of the referendums.  The
    proposal was barely defeated by 51 to 49 percent or something like
    that, and the earthquake was cited as a primary cause.  By comparison,
    the most recent San Jose-only vote was a landslide against, 56 to 44 or
    close to that...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1244 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Thu Aug 13 1992 12:59 | 5 | 
|  | HAHAHAHAHHAHA(TM)  Now, that's funny !
JD
(Re MAC)
 | 
| 3.1245 |  | CAMONE::WAY | There are monkey boys in the facility | Thu Aug 13 1992 13:00 | 5 | 
|  | >    If noone but 'Saw understands/thinks like you, that's pretty sad for
>    you indeed.  ;^}
Hey, I resemble that remark!   8^)
 | 
| 3.1246 | And the San Jose stadium proposal was for $250M, taxpayer provided | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 14 1992 09:07 | 19 | 
|  |                         
    > Easy, Glenn.  It doesn't appear that the Cubs will go broke if they
    > move to the NL West.  Concessions were being made by other teams to
    > accomodate the Cub's wishes to lessen the impact on their SuperStation. 
    > By all reports, Lurie would go broke trying to keep the Giants in San
    > Francisco.
    
    Those reports must have come the propaganda wing of the Lurie empire.
    Bob Lurie is not going broke any time soon.  He's worth $500 million,
    and is one of the few truly cash-rich, purely private, non-leveraged 
    owners in MLB.  I don't expect him to have to sustain continued losses 
    in baseball, but in spite of the negative publicity baseball has been 
    bery bery good to Bob Lurie.  Lurie bought the Giants in 1976 for a 
    mere $8 million, rode out the most prosperous era in its history, and
    just sold the club for $110 million in spite of the fact that he never 
    put much of his own money into it.  Not a bad return on investment, no?
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1247 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Sun Aug 16 1992 20:05 | 7 | 
|  |     It was a little cold, but not really too bad...
    
    Put a fork in the SF Giants.  They're gone.  No one cares if they go
    except a handful.  They tried a demonstration when I was there Monday
    night and they couldn't get people to do that.  Last minute efforts
    are only putting off the inevitable.
    
 | 
| 3.1248 | AL East race is over | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:40 | 5 | 
|  |     Mets traded David Cone to Toronot for Jeff Kent and one other
    player.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1249 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:20 | 12 | 
|  |     
    >>Mets traded David Cone to Toronot for Jeff Kent and one other
    >>player.
    
    TCM:
    
    Is this a sign that the Mucking Fets are giving up on THIS season???
    
    Trading a very good starter away before the race is over!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1250 |  | CTHQ1::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:29 | 6 | 
|  |     Getting rid of high-priced players they couldn't re-sign for sum yung
    blood is ok, even tho Cone is good. Hopefully the floodgates
    pointing west will be soon opening on Yawkey Way. 
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1251 |  | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531 | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:32 | 13 | 
|  | Jake,
Cone is free agent at the end of the year.  He wants a 5 year contract.
He might agree to a 4 year deal, but the Mets have been pretty adament
about not giving pitchers more than a 3 year deal.  The Mets must have
decided that they couldn't sign Cone, and at least got something for 
him.
Depending on the PTBNL, I think the Mets did the right thing.  They 
can use Kent at either 2nd or 3rd.  I'd put him at second and try to
hire Willie Randolph as a coach.
Mike
 | 
| 3.1252 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:36 | 4 | 
|  |     ESPN reported that the PTBNL will probably be OF Derek Bell.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1253 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:32 | 6 | 
|  |     How many games back are the Mets now? Yeah they are giving up on the
    season, but the move was probably a good one. Let me sulk for the
    weekend, I'll let you know on Monday.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1254 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | I shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott... | Thu Aug 27 1992 17:24 | 3 | 
|  |     Which means they can put Bell in CF, and move Hojo to 3rd?  Pecota
    at SS, Kent at 2b?  Pressure is on Toronto to sign him now...
    
 | 
| 3.1255 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 27 1992 19:14 | 5 | 
|  |     Word on ESPN that the PTNBL will be some guy Thompson. nyone heard of
    him??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1256 |  | FDCV06::KING |  | Fri Aug 28 1992 08:05 | 6 | 
|  |     Actually The Blow Jays will have COme only for the rest of the season.
    Cone had stated and re-stated that he wats to pitch in New York.
    The Mets then sign him as a free agent after the season. 
    Then they get Kent and PTBNL "free" from Toronto...
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.1257 | very plausible | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Fri Aug 28 1992 08:36 | 8 | 
|  |     There's also a very strong possibility that "wants to play in NY"
    could be translated "Steinbrenner has a bigger money pot".
    
    Don't discount the possibilility of him donning pinstripes.
    
    hth,
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1258 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Fri Aug 28 1992 08:41 | 9 | 
|  |     
    >>Which means they can put Bell in CF, and move Hojo to 3rd?  Pecota
    >>at SS, Kent at 2b?  Pressure is on Toronto to sign him now...
    
    Speaking of HoJo, is it true the guys gone for the year due to surgery
    on both knees and a shoulder??????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1259 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Aug 28 1992 09:10 | 10 | 
|  |     
    The Mets are in effect "renting" Cone out for the last month of the
    season, but they do have to weigh the players they're receiving 
    against the two first or one first/one second round draft picks
    (depending on the finish of the team that signs Cone) they would have
    gotten in next year's amateur draft.  That's not a tremendously big
    deal, but it is significant...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1260 | Ryan Thompson | WMOIS::DUPREZ_R | Compact Disc Jockey | Sun Aug 30 1992 17:25 | 17 | 
|  |     
    RE: .1255
    
    "Thompson" is Ryan Thompson, an OF at AAA Syracuse.  Saw him play
    a couple of weeks back - he hit two homers.  Good power, good speed.
    Looks like he has lots of talent but I don't remember his numbers
    as being all that spectacular.
    
    If I were a Met fan, I'd have no problem with the deal.  They
    weren't going to re-sign Cone, and they get a couple of good
    young ballplayers.  In Kent's case, they get someone to fill a
    spot.  And I believe Thompson is a CF - if he pans out they move
    HoJo back where he belongs.
    
    					Roland,
    					no longer a RON
    
 | 
| 3.1261 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Mon Aug 31 1992 07:42 | 8 | 
|  |     
    >>					Roland,
    >>					no longer a RON
    
    Welcome aboard, Roland, we need all the new blood we can get.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1262 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Wed Sep 02 1992 20:02 | 11 | 
|  |     Anybody see the film fo Vince "where's the brain" Coleman lasted night
    arguing with the Mucking Fets' manager after the manager(cain't
    remember his name)came out to seperate Coleman from the umpire???
    
    Coleman is getting big bucks to act like the south facing end of a
    northbound mule, ain't he?????
    
    THe Mucking Fets then suspended Coleman for 2 games without pay.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1263 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Sep 02 1992 22:23 | 7 | 
|  |     It gets better with Coleman. WFAN was reporting that like most managers
    Torborg does not want his players playing golf on game days. Rumor has
    it that Coleman played a round of golf yesterday morning and there was
    tension between them even before the incident during the game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1264 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 03 1992 08:42 | 8 | 
|  |     There was another good "where's the brainer" in an Astros game earlier
    this week.  'Stros pitcher Darryl Kile went to cover first on a right
    side grounder, but didn't get there in time and the runner was called
    safe.  As Kile argued the call *while still holding the ball*, the
    runner on second came in to score!
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1265 |  | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531 | Thu Sep 03 1992 12:29 | 3 | 
|  | Sounds like David Cone a few seasons back.  He let two runners score.
Mike
 | 
| 3.1266 | Faye voted out! Hot flash | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Sep 03 1992 21:53 | 13 | 
|  |     
    
    HOT NEWS FLASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    By a 18-9 vote the MLB owners voted to ouste Commissioner Faye Vincent!
    (B'Sox voted him to stay)
    
    Action moves from the Field to the courthouse!
    
    I remain,
    yer radio reporter!
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1267 | Naturally they want him to resign | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Sep 03 1992 22:06 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1268 | Kev,Interesting choice of words for .1266 title :-) | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Sep 04 1992 02:32 | 18 | 
|  |     Vote was to ask him to resign. Peter Gammons on ESPN speculated that
    Vincent's supporters will ask him to leave since it is clear he won't
    be able to do anything for the rest of his term. Also, that in next
    weeks meeting in St. Louis the vote to fire him could be 22-6 or even
    23-5. Vincent would have 2 days to get an injunction and that might not
    happen, so he would be gone. 
    
    There is something to be said for principle (can't believe I said that
    in this notesfile :-), but it sounds like Vincent would be beter off
    cutting his losses at this point. He was hired by the owners and much
    as he might like to think of his office as serving the fans, players
    and owners he really serves the owners. One of the things I agreed with
    in Marvin Miller's book - which was quite self serving in lots of ways
    - was that the commissioner as a representative of all of baseball is a
    myth.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1269 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Sep 04 1992 07:53 | 3 | 
|  |        As usual, the owners put the blame for their own incompetance on
    somebody else.
                                  Denny
 | 
| 3.1270 | Lockout in March! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Sep 04 1992 08:13 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1271 | The job is a no-win situation | SALES::THILL |  | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:35 | 27 | 
|  |     So if they fired him, that means he can collect unemployment, but if
    they "ask him to resign" that means he cain't, right? :-)
    
    The whole problem with the office the way that it is set up is that
    there is no way it can be anything BUT a lackie yes-man job, only there
    to serve the 28 owners. It always has been, going back to Kennisaw
    Mountain Landis (I wonder if his nickname was 'Saw?), who was appointed
    to restore the PR image of baseball after the Black Sox scandal. 
    
    Bowie Kuhn, who wore several pairs of long johns under his suit so he 
    could pretend that it wasn't cold enough for a coat at the first World
    Series night games inteh early '70s, was no different.
    
    The owners liked Uberoth at first 'cause he made them rich(er) but felt
    betrayed when the collusion scam was uncovered. Gaimanti was
    romanticised as a_intellectual/fan, and was potentially the best
    commish there was, cause he was actually a FAN of the game, and he even
    suggested a hold on ticket price increases. He wasnt around long enough
    :-( Fay bungled a few things, but in fairness to him, never really had a 
    chance
    
    Having the owners in charge of the commish is like parents having the
    kids make all the household rules: "I don't have to do ANY homework or go 
    to school, my allowance is a million dollars a week and for dinner we'll 
    have a can of chocolate frosting..." 
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1272 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NatteringNabobsOfNegativism | Fri Sep 04 1992 10:46 | 4 | 
|  |     	Within 10 years every major baseball decision will be made by
    a federal judge and then appealed to the Supreme Court.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1273 | Vincent resigns | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Sep 07 1992 19:39 | 3 | 
|  |     
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1274 | Faye It Ain't So... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo,That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Tue Sep 08 1992 12:26 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1275 | Guess he'll just Fay'd away after all! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Sep 08 1992 12:49 | 2 | 
|  |     
    
 | 
| 3.1276 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Mon Sep 14 1992 09:31 | 8 | 
|  |     Aneebuddy know what the Expos(ed) did lasted night???
    
    They was losing 5-4 but I didn't hear the final score.
    
    Thanks in advance
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1277 | Maybe only real pennant race left... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Sep 14 1992 09:35 | 9 | 
|  |     
    > Aneebuddy know what the Expos(ed) did lasted night???
    >
    > They was losing 5-4 but I didn't hear the final score.
    
    Pulled it out, 7-5 to move within three games, sorry to say...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1278 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Carp Per Diem | Mon Sep 14 1992 10:42 | 4 | 
|  |     Damn those Mucking Fets cain't do anything right, cain they??
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1279 |  | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Mon Sep 14 1992 11:47 | 7 | 
|  |     
    Jake,
    
    	I'm pretty sure Larry Walker cranked a 3 run dinger to win
    	it for the Expos.......
    
    Claybone
 | 
| 3.1280 | Wouldn't that be just a shame?  ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Tue Sep 15 1992 16:50 | 15 | 
|  |        
    A vote to protect the prospective local buyers of the San Francisco
    Giants against the cost of lawsuits was unanimously passed by the 
    SF city council yesterday.  The National League had previously pledged 
    its support to local buyers in their bid to keep the Giants in San
    Francisco, and Bob Lurie has acquiesced to the league's wishes.
    
    It very much looks like it's all over but the crying once again for
    Tampa/St Pete.  They prepared for a lawsuit in advance this time, but 
    no amount of legal tantrum-throwing is going to allow them to sue the 
    Giants out of another state.  The Tilt-a-Dome still looms as a massive
    albatross around the neck of the community...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1281 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Wed Sep 16 1992 08:32 | 4 | 
|  | It would make my year if Tampa/St. Bleat ends up with nothing.  Haha.  Maybe
they should try for a Japanese team....
JD
 | 
| 3.1282 |  | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Wed Sep 16 1992 09:08 | 6 | 
|  | �It would make my year if Tampa/St. Bleat ends up with nothing.  Haha.  Maybe
�they should try for a Japanese team....
Nah, the Japanese comissioner would never approve "merican ownership.
8^)
 | 
| 3.1283 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Intro to Employee Interest Noting 101 | Fri Sep 18 1992 08:17 | 11 | 
|  |     PINELLA(sp?) AND DIBBLE QUIBBLE!!!
    
    Is Dibble headed for another suspension????
    
    Is Pinella(sp?) headed for the WWF???
    
    Does anybody Care?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1284 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:14 | 5 | 
|  |     
    Is Rob Dibble the ultimate primordial wet lump of clay?
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1285 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Completely Mindless | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:43 | 12 | 
|  |     
    >>Is Rob Dibble the ultimate primordial wet lump of clay?
    
    >>glenn
    
    glenn,
    
    I think he's a wet lump, but more of a wet lump of what a bull leaves
    steaming in the field than clay.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1286 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:10 | 4 | 
|  | So then, using Jake's Guide to Fe-males, Rob Dibble is the absolute PERFECT
catch...;-)
JD
 | 
| 3.1287 | Great with kids, too... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:52 | 12 | 
|  |     
> So then, using Jake's Guide to Fe-males, Rob Dibble is the absolute PERFECT
> catch...;-)
    
    I seen his wife in SI, and she's smashing.  It was one of those puff
    pieces where they claim that Dibble is a big puppy-dog type, who has 
    been "misinterpreted" his whole life, has never thrown at anyone, 
    never intentionally tried to hurt any living thing, and just wants to
    be treated like a main...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1288 | A real main's main! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AlanAlda,PauleyShore,RobDibble | Fri Sep 18 1992 11:11 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1289 | ALT/PITT SCORE? | WILBRY::MCDONALD |  | Mon Oct 12 1992 12:31 | 7 | 
|  |     Score from last nites game??
    
    ( I looked for a topic for the NLCS but didn't find one )
    
    Thanks
    Shawn
    
 | 
| 3.1290 |  | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Oct 12 1992 13:01 | 4 | 
|  |     Pittsburgh 7, Atlanta 1.  Pittsburgh knocked Atlanta starting pitcher
    Steve Avery out in the firsted innning by scoring 4 runs.
    
    John
 | 
| 3.1291 | This OCT. is costing Bonds $$$$ | WILBRY::MCDONALD |  | Mon Oct 12 1992 14:06 | 5 | 
|  |     Great, at least it's a series now.
    
    Any chance Bonds showed up for the game??
    
    s-
 | 
| 3.1292 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Mon Oct 12 1992 15:53 | 11 | 
|  |     there's a write up of sorts in 92.sumthinorother, that I put in early
    this AM when the game finished.
    
    Bonds went 2-5, with one RBI, two runs scored, one stolen base, and a
    beaut of a catch, on the run, in left center field to rob Ron Gant of a
    run producing extra base hit, and possibly rally catalyst.
    
    Bonds played like he did in Sept. lasted night.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1293 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 16 1992 08:51 | 14 | 
|  |     
     So, did anyone catch the post-game feud between the Neon Peon
    and Tim McCarver. In the Braves locker room after the 7th game, 
    Ole Slime Time sought Tim McCarver out and dumped a large bucket 
    of water on him while McCarver was conducting interviews. Peon did 
    this not once but FOUR times. McCarver was understandably upset.
    It seems Peon did it in retaliation for McCarver's criticism of 
    Peon's jetting from the Falcon's game to the Braves' game on 
    Sunday. Pretty mature response. I'm not Tim McCarver's biggest
    fan (Annie Wilkes is) but it's his job to offer his opinion on
    anything pertaining to baseball. FWIW, I also felt that whole 
    scenario Sunday was nothing but a publicity stunt.
    
    
 | 
| 3.1294 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Fri Oct 16 1992 08:56 | 5 | 
|  | 
Tommy tm that ole Slime Time, it's a beauty....At this point one has to wonder
who has the bigger ego Slime Time or Ross Perot?
mike
 | 
| 3.1295 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 16 1992 09:15 | 19 | 
|  | >Tommy tm that ole Slime Time, it's a beauty....At this point one has to wonder
>who has the bigger ego Slime Time or Ross Perot?
Neon does.  8^)
Seriously, I like Tim McCarver.  He's done really well for an ex-player,
compared to some other ex-players I've seen.
As to Deion dumping a bucket of water.  Well, once is okay.  But four
times is really pushing it.
I personally would've busted Deion up a bit.  I'm not a really patient
guy, and okay, once is funny, twice is cute, but after that, hey,
let's act like adults.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1296 |  | LJOHUB::CRITZ |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 09:32 | 20 | 
|  |     	RE: McCarver and Neon
    
    	Lasted (tm) night on TNT, after the Vikings' game, one
    	of the commentators said the Snake had an idea. Why not
    	contact Bob Arum or Don King and have a boxing match
    	between McCarver and Neon.
    
    	I thought it was pretty funny.
    
    	My cut at this Neon thing is simple -
    
    	He's no Bo Jackson.
    
    	He needs to decide which sport he wants to play and play it.
    
    	Someone on TV last night said that the Braves may replace Neon
    	on the roster with someone else. Neon said he wouldn't be home
    	crying about it. He'd go play football with the Falcons.
    
    	Scott
 | 
| 3.1297 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 16 1992 09:51 | 10 | 
|  |     
       Given their respective ages and the state of their physical
      conditions, a Peon vs. McCarver bout would, at least on paper,
      be a gross mismatch. If McCarver really wants to get back at
      the Peon he should take a cue from Robert Townsend's "Hollywood
      Shuffle" and steal the Peon's curl activator. I would have liked
      to have seen Peon try that stunt on Dan Deirdorf or OJ Simpson.
    
      BTW - word in today's Globule is that the Braves have included
      Slime Time on their world series roster.
 | 
| 3.1298 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:04 | 4 | 
|  |        McCarver was yelling. "You're a real man Deion" at him as he
    slithered away. Hopefully the Braves will keep him off the WS roster
    and we won't have to look at him nexted week.
                                 Dneny
 | 
| 3.1299 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:06 | 7 | 
|  |     Neon_sign(tm) is living up to his nickname. Think about it, neon signs
    are generally associated with Gawdy, vulgar things (Las Vegas, sleazy
    nightclubs, Times Square, etc.) They are never associated with CLASS,
    and Neon_sign has zero class.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1300 | Yup, saw it...^^^^ | XCALBR::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:10 | 3 | 
|  |     Except, I didn't see it the first time because at least Ch. 7 didn't
    show McCarver talking to any of the players before they left the air...
    
 | 
| 3.1301 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:17 | 8 | 
|  |     What did McCarver say to get Neon so steamed?
    
    McCarver is asking the NL for a formal apology.
    
    At least we're seeing creative reporter mugging this season.  First
    there was Roger and the hamburger buns, now Deion and the ice bucket. 
    Definitely more interesting than the "athlete slugs reporter" routine
    that is typically seen.
 | 
| 3.1302 |  | XCALBR::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:24 | 1 | 
|  |     That he was selfish for trying to play 2 sports in 1 day...
 | 
| 3.1303 | Ugh... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:25 | 22 | 
|  |          
    It's pretty obvious that Deion doesn't care too much for his team in
    being pre-occupied with his endorsement possibilities during the NLCS 
    and by pulling stunts like that after his team just pulled off one of 
    the greatest wins in MLB history, but that doesn't mean we can't put 
    this in terms that even Deion himself can understand: bad, *bad* PR 
    move, Deion.  Nike...no...like...
    
    That's a hell of a way to pay CBS back for all they did in shamelessly 
    pandering to Deion by covering his cross-country trip, even sending a 
    personal lackey along in the person of MrT's favoritest broadcasting 
    celebrity, Pat O'Brien.  This is my main objection with CBS ever since 
    they paid that outrageous amount for the baseball contract.  They're 
    doing their damndest to turn MLB into a celebrity circus, a la the NBA.
    Baseball don't need help from the likes of a bit player like Deion.
    Play the game, respect the game, and you earn respect.
    
    Here's hoping that the Braves reconsider their decision on the roster
    spot so that I can stomach rooting for the Braves in the Series.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1304 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:47 | 9 | 
|  |     
     Your first paragraph pretty much sums up the way I felt about 
    it, Glen. How he could even think of himself at a time like that
    just boggles the mind. As far as paying CBS back goes though, they
    deserved to slapped up side the head for wasting air time on the
    whole travelin' Peon debacle. 
    
    BTW - according to this morning's Globe the ratings numbers for
    both LCS' were down significantly from last year.
 | 
| 3.1305 | WWF/MLB | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:06 | 5 | 
|  |     	This whole Neion/McCarver thing reminds me of when Papa Shango
    put a curse on Mean Gene Okerlund.  I'll tell ya, major league baseball
    is learning...
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1306 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:16 | 2 | 
|  |        Unbelievable Gorilla!!
                                            Denny
 | 
| 3.1307 | Maybe Ill change to M_Primetime_B | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:36 | 10 | 
|  |     I think we have the Air Jordan of Baseball/Football.  Some people
    just Gotta hate him, therefore I gotta Like em :-)
    
    The only thing I have to say is if he broke any written
    terms/agreements with either the falcons or Braves thats
    one thing, but if not let em play.  I dont watch much baseball
    but in football it just seems like he makes good things happen
    every time he touches the ball....
    
    					M_Air_B
 | 
| 3.1308 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:46 | 8 | 
|  |   >> I think we have the Air Jordan of Baseball/Football.  Some people
  >> just Gotta hate him, therefore I gotta Like em :-)
    
     I don't remember anyone saying they didn't like the Neon Peon
     until this despicable incident. He made his bed and now he's 
     going to have to pay the piper. [how's that for mixed metaphors?]
    
    
 | 
| 3.1309 |  | LJOHUB::CRITZ |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 14:11 | 10 | 
|  |     	RE: 3.1307
    
    	I believe McCarver did say that Neon did have a contract
    	that stipulated that he (Neon) could not play football if
    	Atlanta was in the pennant race (and World Series).
    
    	So, if that's the troof (tm), then Neon broke his contract
    	(which, of course, is nothing new in pro sports).
    
    	Scott
 | 
| 3.1310 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 14:14 | 8 | 
|  |     I'm pretty sure the contract was that Neon_sign(tm) would not miss any
    baseball games during the playoffs. Of course everyones logical
    assumption was that meant no football. So Neon_sign may have broken an
    implicit contract - which can carry some weight - but not a written
    contract.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1311 | Glitter Boy needs to grow up | MATE::MMARLAND |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 14:41 | 12 | 
|  |     Bottom line , what goes around comes around, let's look at his stat's
    Falcons are once again in the cellar. Some big impact player here. For
    the Braves, I think he's had a few AB's the one I saw he wiffed big time as
    a pinch hitter. I'd like see him try to make it a both, but I think
    circumstances catch up real quick. Great PR for Deion, little results
    for the men who sign his check...
    
    Time for this glitter boy to grow up a bit. After all, most players are
    looked upon for their accomplishments on the field, not off.
    
    Mike
       
 | 
| 3.1312 | NO TO BLAM! | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:02 | 12 | 
|  |     KNNEEON IS NO TWO BLAM!   LITE ME UP FOLLOWS MCNOVER A TOOO BITE
    KORCHER THAT IS JELLYUS OF DEDON11!!!!   HE MAKE MILLIYON PAYEING BOAT
    FUTBUL AND BAZEBULL AND YUR JEST JELOUS!!!    HE ES NO TOO BLAM!  ALL
    SLANDER DOD WUZ THRO WADER ON MACARVVER AND GET HIM WET - ALL IN PHONE!
    TIME MCCOGLE KENT TAKE A JOCK!    NOXON DEADON IS TWUE TALLANT - HE
    BEGGOR THAN TONI EASION AND CHANISLAW NOS IT!    LEAF HIM ALOAN -
    STANDERS LED BLAVES TOO PENANCE AND FULCRUMS TO PLAYOAFS!
    
    
    GOAT DEION!
    
    CR
 | 
| 3.1313 | RCASO alert | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:20 | 3 | 
|  |     
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1315 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Almost, Damnit, only 'Almost' | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:46 | 13 | 
|  |     Question, now I know the answer for this question when it comes to
    football, it's because he wears a helmet and that makes the ole head
    slightly aerodynamic, but
    
    How doe Deon Sanders run so fast when playing baseball with ears
    sticking out like tail flaps on a 747????  Does he pin them back to
    help on the aerodynamics?????  Shouldn't those ears limit him to the
    speed of, say, Mike Lavalliere????
    
    Inquiring minds and all that
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1316 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:48 | 11 | 
|  | >    How doe Deon Sanders run so fast when playing baseball with ears
>    sticking out like tail flaps on a 747????  Does he pin them back to
>    help on the aerodynamics?????  Shouldn't those ears limit him to the
>    speed of, say, Mike Lavalliere????
    
Park Effects.
'Saw for Dan    
 | 
| 3.1318 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Francisco Cabrera, my hero | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:51 | 6 | 
|  |     re: .1317
    
    Because he wanted you to ask?? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1319 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 15:59 | 2 | 
|  |     I wondered to but didn't want to start a political or pc type
    discussion...
 | 
| 3.1320 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:02 | 5 | 
|  |     
    "Poisenal"?  That sounds Brooklynese...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1321 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!!! | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:22 | 8 | 
|  |     Bacause that's how it sounded.  Let's face it, Sanders is no Orson
    Wells when it somes to diction, but more like Orson Donshultewski, the
    mill hunky.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1322 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:28 | 1 | 
|  |     Ok, never mind....
 | 
| 3.1323 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:31 | 10 | 
|  |     
    >>I wondered to but didn't want to start a political or pc type
    >>discussion...
    
    Hey, we don't talk about Personal Computing in here!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1324 | What does C> mean? | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:46 | 1 | 
|  |     Tell that to the technodweebs....
 | 
| 3.1325 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Fri Oct 16 1992 16:49 | 6 | 
|  |     
    Hey Walt, that's my line!!  Careful or I'll banish you from the
    sports.oldiesbutgoodies.note.  I gots mod privs you know, and I ain't
    afraid to use them  (ask Farley).
    
    BtFM
 | 
| 3.1326 | Brews sez "What does C> mean?" | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Fri Oct 16 1992 17:10 | 3 | 
|  |     Sorry
    Brews sez "Tell that to the technodweebs.... "
    
 | 
| 3.1327 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Fri Oct 16 1992 17:35 | 2 | 
|  |     huh?  wassamatta?  Dinz got your keyboard?
    
 | 
| 3.1328 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Fri Oct 16 1992 18:44 | 4 | 
|  |     	I see where McSherry is making a miracle HulkHogan recovery.
    Glad to hear it.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1329 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 09:12 | 11 | 
|  |     No World Series note, so I enter this here.
    
    Series tied at 1 each, headed for Canadia.
    
    Braves(should be the Bucs, dammit) win game 1 on ??Berryhill's??(I
    think) 3 run HR, final 3-1.
    
    Game lasted night see-sawed and the Blue Jays(GO TORONTO!!) won, 5-4.
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1330 |  | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Mon Oct 19 1992 09:17 | 5 | 
|  |     Well at least Reardon won't get a stiff neck from last night.
    Those muscles oughta be well toned by now.
    
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1331 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 09:21 | 1 | 
|  | Jeff Rearend blows another one 8^(
 | 
| 3.1332 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Mon Oct 19 1992 09:33 | 10 | 
|  |     
    >Jeff Rearend blows another one 8^(
    
    Was anyone surprised when he was brought in and admirably demonstrated
    his forte?
    
    I thought not.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1333 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:00 | 3 | 
|  |     After ticking off the Native Americans in last year's World Series, now
    Atlanta has angered the Canadians.  It seems the Canadian Flag was hung
    upside down during the opening ceremonies.
 | 
| 3.1334 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:17 | 16 | 
|  |     
     re .1333
    
     Didn't one of the announcers last night make mention of how the 
    Atlanta area papers were playing up the Canada vs. US angle ?
    
     I said it somewhere in note 92 in response to another noter's 
    "keep it in the US" statement. I don't understand that kind of
    thinking at all. The Blue Jays and the Braves aren't the national 
    teams of Canada and the US. They're two major league baseball
    teams. Period. What are we going to do should the Jays win it ?
    Form another Dream Team so we can restore national pride ?
    
     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?
    
 | 
| 3.1335 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:18 | 12 | 
|  | >     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
>           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?
Was that after RearEnd served up a nice Mama Leone meatball?
If so, I zapped out after the meatball landed in the sauce behind the
fence.....
'Saw    
 | 
| 3.1336 |  | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:29 | 10 | 
|  | >     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
>           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?
I felt more like hurling when they showed the instant replay of Jane singing 
"Take me out to the Ballgame" with the crowd, and then smooching with Ted more
blatently than Dickstah and Casey.  You could even hear in McDonough's voice
that he thought it was stoopid.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1337 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:43 | 19 | 
|  |     
    How come Sean McDonough didn't yell "I don't believe what I just saw!"
    when Sprague hit that home run?  Oh yeah, never mind...
    
    I'm not buying into the Ugly Americanism thing this time.  Winning 
    this World Series means much, much more to Canada than losing it does 
    to Americans, believe me.  Show of hands: how many Canadians are 
    rooting for the Jays?  How many Americans are rooting for the Braves?
    Hell, there were reportedly a number of Jays' fans who sincerely
    believed that there was an American conspiracy to keep Toronto out of
    the World Series in previous years, because of the TV ratings and such.  
    Only Canada and /Don could believe something like that... ;-)
    
    C'mon, any rivalry here is good-natured.  We should respect whatever
    these foreign countries want to make of it.  It's Canada versus the
    Confederacy with the rest of us in the middle choosing sides... ;-)
    
    glenn
                                                                       
 | 
| 3.1338 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Flower child gone to seed | Mon Oct 19 1992 10:57 | 10 | 
|  |     
    Hey Bob,
    
    Suck my face.
    
    
    8^)
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1339 |  | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:04 | 8 | 
|  | Dickstah
Not if dan'l gets there first...
8^)
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1340 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:31 | 4 | 
|  |     
    I was rooting for the Braves until I saw JAne's prayer act.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1341 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:34 | 7 | 
|  | >    I was rooting for the Braves until I saw JAne's prayer act.
    
I am rooting for Atlanta, but if they keep putting Jeff RearEnd in the
game, they'll be gone in 5......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1342 |  | BSS::JCOTANCH |  | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:41 | 9 | 
|  | >    Hell, there were reportedly a number of Jays' fans who sincerely
>    believed that there was an American conspiracy to keep Toronto out of
>    the World Series in previous years, because of the TV ratings and such.  
>    Only Canada and /Don could believe something like that... ;-)
    
I'm sure JD could believe it too!  :^)
Joe
 | 
| 3.1343 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:52 | 2 | 
|  |     Did they really have the Canadian flag upside down?
    
 | 
| 3.1344 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:56 | 1 | 
|  |     They sure did, Walt.  I saw it myself on the morning news.
 | 
| 3.1345 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:04 | 9 | 
|  | 
>>    They sure did, Walt.  I saw it myself on the morning news.
 and you call yourself a baseball fan? shame on you......
 many -> ;^)
 must have been a rugby game on another channel...
 | 
| 3.1346 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:08 | 12 | 
|  |     
     Personally, I don't like easy labels like "Politically Correct" or "Ugly 
    Americanism". Labels specifically designed to draw a specific reaction.
    I don't think this is about "Ugly Americanism". The number of people who 
    want the Braves to keep it in America is miniscule compared to the number 
    of folks who just want to see good baseball but the sentiment has been
    voiced more than once. And it's no big news flash that percentage of Can-
    adians behind the Jays is greater than the percentage of Americans behind 
    the Braves. Not only do we have longer standing stronger team loyalties
    but this is virgin territory for them. Let's just hope that the level
    of baseball stays at what it has been so far and let the chips fall where
    they may.
 | 
| 3.1347 |  | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:12 | 5 | 
|  |     
    It seems that the papers are playing up this USA vs. Canada thing, not
    hte people.  I mean, how many players are Canadian on either team?
    
    Brews 
 | 
| 3.1348 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:15 | 9 | 
|  | 	You also gotta love old Hanoi Jane belting out the national anthemn 
with such fervor.  Course I guess in retrospect America has been very very 
good to her.  I mean she's living the "American Dream" what with being an 
aerobicized accessory for Ted Turner's forearm.  Also other than the first 
Canadien who sang his anthem the first night, the anthems have been a "who 
can sing slower and/or add that genius creative flair to the song" contest. 
UGH!
				/Don
 | 
| 3.1349 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:23 | 4 | 
|  | 
 ah you're all a bunch of Morten Downeys picking on poor ole Jane....
 ;^)
 | 
| 3.1350 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:26 | 2 | 
|  |     The same people are saying "Let's do it for USA" are the same ones who
    haven't given Francisco Cabrera a green card yet, right?
 | 
| 3.1351 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:28 | 3 | 
|  |     I wonder...  Was it done on purpose ???   ~/~
    
    Bg
 | 
| 3.1352 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:35 | 3 | 
|  |     	Walt, maybe Ted&Jane can lend Francisco their Gold Card.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1353 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:49 | 7 | 
|  | A guy I play rugby with got his green card in the recent lottery.
Did you know that the card is NOT green?
hth,
'Sa
 | 
| 3.1354 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:00 | 3 | 
|  |     Never has been...
    
    
 | 
| 3.1355 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:15 | 8 | 
|  |     > It seems that the papers are playing up this USA vs. Canada thing, not
    > hte people.  I mean, how many players are Canadian on either team?
    
    You beat me to it Brews.  For that matter, there are several players on
    each team who are neither Canadian nor American.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1356 | Moroons | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:11 | 6 | 
|  |     ...and the stadium message board was displaying messages in French,
    supposedly for the benefit of the Toronto fans. Well, guess what
    Atlanta...
       The official language of Ontario is ENGLISH!! Toronto is not in
    Quebec!
                                       Denny
 | 
| 3.1357 | Go Jays, eh? | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:30 | 23 | 
|  |     I didn't catch the French part. In fact, you might wonder if'n that was
    done specifically to piss off the Toronto fans. They have been known to
    boo their own national anthem if it is the version where the first part
    is sung in French...Take a look at the Canada conference if you want to
    see how sensitive the whole country is about this.
    
    Since the Expos have been around longer, they were the original
    "Canada's National Team," but in the last several years, people in the
    predominantly Engish-speaking areas have gravitated more toward the
    Jays. A large part of it has to do with on-field success, but some of
    it is political. When the Jays play in Detroit or Seattle, there's 
    usually a large contingent of Canadians in the stands. Even at Fenway, 
    where it isn't always easy to get tickets, I've seen a lot of Blue Jays 
    fans. I don't think the Expos get many away fans (or even at home), but
    the nearest NL city is New York.
    
    The Jays have had Canadian players, but they all were traded/relaesed.
    The most notable, ironically, is Denis Boucher, who's from the Montreal
    area. I read somewhere that the Jays are 19 Americans, 5 Dominicans, 2 
    Puerto Ricans (who are US Citizens) and a Jamaican. Hey mon, who's dat
    guy wid de dreadlocks 'angin oot of 'is cap?
       
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1358 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:40 | 20 | 
|  | >
>    I didn't catch the French part. In fact, you might wonder if'n that was
>    done specifically to piss off the Toronto fans. They have been known to
>    boo their own national anthem if it is the version where the first part
>    is sung in French...Take a look at the Canada conference if you want to
>    see how sensitive the whole country is about this.
This is a very sensitive issue.
On A&E (I believe) John Byner has a comedy special that travels from
city to city.  The night they did it from Toronto (or someplace near
there) there were a lot of Canadian comics.
They did the standard jokes about how Canadians don't say "oot" and
stuff like that, but by far the most popular jokes, and the most
numerous were those that bashed the French speaking peoples of Canada.
'Saw    
 | 
| 3.1359 | Expos a victim of Quebec politics | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:01 | 18 | 
|  |     Yeah, it's kinda too bad about how things in Can-e-dah have degenerated
    in the last 15 or so years. You can blame a lot of it on guys like Rene
    Levesque who were pushing a sepratist agenda in the 70s. Didja know
    that they passed a law that ripped up every "STOP" sign in the province
    and replaced it with one that says "ARRET"? Even in Paris vendors sell
    "le hot dog" but in Montreal, they sell "chiens-chauds." In Montreal's 
    Chinatown, Chinese signs are illegal (cause then English signs would be
    OK too) and French is the only official language. Because of this, many
    English speakers have left Montreal, further limiting it's diversity.
    
    The Expos have paid the price, since even though there are French fans, 
    baseball was more a sport that appeals to the English speakers. In 68
    when they first granted the franchise, Montreal was about 30-35%
    English, but now it's between 15-20%. You still need to be bilinguial
    if you have any sort of job that deals with the public.
    
    Tom 
    
 | 
| 3.1360 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:08 | 9 | 
|  | And from what I understand, the situation is complicated by the fact that
there are more (several, one?) province(s) EAST of Quebec that are English
speaking.
From what I've heard, if it weren't for that, the English speaking folks
in the gov't would have said "Hey, take off, eh, separate, eh, get oot".
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1361 | No offense eh! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:19 | 14 | 
|  |        All this Canada talk forces me to put this joke in here:
    All of you hosers know how Canada got it's name right? There were these
    guys sittin' around the fire drinkin' Moosehaid one wintery night. One
    of them says "Ain't it about time we named this here country eh?
    So they took a box and put all the letters a the alphabet in it. 
    First guy pulls out a letter...
    "C eh"
    Next guy pulls one out...
    "N eh"
    And one more...
    "D eh"
       And There you have it...C A N A D A!
                                        Sorry,
                                          Denny
 | 
| 3.1362 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:32 | 13 | 
|  |     RE Jane
    
    Made me sick seeing her doing the false prayer act, and the scene
    during the 7th inning stretch.
    
    As far as her being one of TedT's accessories, you cain put her as an
    accessory at the end of my...er...ARM, yeah that't the ticket, ARM,
    ANYTIME!!!!
    
    She do look good fer an old broad!!    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1363 | Flame Off !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:34 | 12 | 
|  |      Denny,  You DOG !!!!   Thats one of my all time favorite
    jokes...   I was about to put it in but you beat me to it.  
    
     You know what pisses me off,  is that we have cities like Atlanta
    representing this country abroad.  We should respect others flags
    and diversity... that iswhat makes this country great and we should
    encourge it in others not prove to the world how backwards we are
    by pulling stunts like the flag and the language thing, either on
    purpose or by accident...  
    
    BG
     
 | 
| 3.1364 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:41 | 13 | 
|  | Hotlanta is gettin' ready for the 'lympics!
They wuz jes' practiciin'.
I'm surprised you didn't see that Stimpy on Drugs thang, or that
Blue Condom with eyes thang (same thang, different interpetation).....
yeeeeeee-ha!
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1365 | Hotlants Olympics | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:14 | 3 | 
|  |        "Rings go better with Coke". (I stole it from Bill Conlon a the
    Sports Reporters.)
                                    Denny
 | 
| 3.1366 | Don't matter if it's Atlanta, Hoboken or Colo. Spgs it's stupid | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:22 | 5 | 
|  |     Well,  it's just too bad that people a stupid enough to pull that kinda
    crap... it's really bad PR for the god ole` US of A and we don't need
    any more of that than we already got!  no what I mean vern ??
    
    BG
 | 
| 3.1367 | Cultural imperialism = NFL>CFL | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:18 | 34 | 
|  | >And from what I understand, the situation is complicated by the fact that
>there are more (several, one?) province(s) EAST of Quebec that are English
>speaking.
>'Saw
    
    The Maritimes are east of Quebec. New/Nouveau Brunswick is the only
    truly bilingual province, with about equal numbers of each group. Nova
    Scotia, Prince Edward Island, NewFOUNDland and Labrador are English
    speaking. Most of the people there are decendents of Scots and Irish,
    and have a speech pattern more like their kinfolk than the "typical"
    Canajin accent, eh? There are even signs in a gaelic-type language, and
    some older folks still speak it. The Newfies aren't considered Canajin, 
    by a lot of people's standards, (didn't join Canada til the '50s) and 
    they are the butt of a lot of effnik jokes.
    
    
>From what I've heard, if it weren't for that, the English speaking folks
>in the gov't would have said "Hey, take off, eh, separate, eh, get oot".
    
    Maybe so, but a little too complicated to get into here. The thing to
    remember is that a lot of Canadians are more than a little worried
    about "Cultural Imperialism" from the US engulfing it. You can see it
    with the low gates in the CFL (a better game IMO) partly due to the NFL
    available on cable TV. Some Americans think of Canada as another state,
    cause you can drive to it, but that's probably the quickest way to
    infuriate an otherwise mild-mannered Canadian! If Quebec left, its
    living standard would go down. Some suggest that if it were to happen, 
    the next step would be for the Maratimes to join the USA? Hey, we already 
    got ONE West Virginia!
    
    Tom  
 | 
| 3.1368 |  | RUGBY1::way | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 08:42 | 18 | 
|  | I like Canadians, eh?  They are some fine folk, even if they do
talk about oh-fense, instead of aw-fense, and call these things
on the computer pr-oh-cesses, instead of pr-ah-cesses.  8^)
Seriously, I know things are very complex up there.  A while ago,
when they had some big major vote (and forgive me, with my failing
memory these days I cannot remember WHAT it was for) they covered
the parliment stuff on C-SPAN.  It was very interesting, but the
complexity of the issues was overwhelming.
"Newfie" jokes in Canada used to be on the same level as Polish jokes
were here, until we started cleaning up our act.....
Some beautiful country up dere in Canada, eh?
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1369 | all in fun...don't nuke us ;-) | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | Drink Canada Dry....I'm trying | Tue Oct 20 1992 08:51 | 6 | 
|  |     Heard on the news last night...
    
    Stores in Toronto have reported a brisk business in the sale of those
    small U.S. flags.  Methinks something is brewing for tonight.
    
    pete
 | 
| 3.1370 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Tue Oct 20 1992 09:05 | 5 | 
|  |        I also heard on the radio that the Toronto fans plan on 'getting
    even'. Hey, just so everyone doesn't take this stuff TOO seriously! I
    hope it's all in fun. That guy in the color guard is probably still
    doing pushups!
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.1371 | and zed vs. z... | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Tue Oct 20 1992 12:42 | 4 | 
|  |     Isn't that offence?  Not offense?
    
    Sort of like Labour vs. labor...
    
 | 
| 3.1372 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 12:50 | 23 | 
|  | >    Isn't that offence?  Not offense?
>    
>    Sort of like Labour vs. labor...
Yeah, from a spelling point of view you are correct, Sir!
I was merely trying to show in a written medium, the differences
in pronounciation 8^)
My dictionary in my office is put out by a Canadian publisher, and
it has all those extra things like silent 'u' and 'c' in place of 's'.
But as my Australian mate Madge is fond of saying
	I don't 'av an accent, mate, YOU do...
'Saw    
 | 
| 3.1373 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Tue Oct 20 1992 12:56 | 4 | 
|  |     'saw's been mating with the dishwashing liquid lady?  It cain't be that
    bad, can it 'saw?
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1374 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DEVILS, J-E-S-T-S ON SKATES | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:32 | 1 | 
|  |     	Blue Jays win tonight and send Ted & The Accessory home sad.
 | 
| 3.1375 | 'e noo ow ta put da puckinda net, eh? | SALES::THILL |  | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:45 | 4 | 
|  |     Re Saw - That was probably the Meech Lake Accord
    
    Hopefully the Jays Oh-fence will do the job, as long as they don't run
    into a hot goalER.. uh, wrong sport, never mind...
 | 
| 3.1377 |  | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Wed Oct 21 1992 09:15 | 6 | 
|  |     
    
    	Jeff Reardon!!!!!!
    
    :*)
    
 | 
| 3.1379 | ...at least it's someone else getting burned... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 21 1992 09:43 | 13 | 
|  |  
    WEEI had a stirring tribute to Reardon this morning entitled "Bob Dylan's 
    Salute to Jeff Reardon", as performed by the master hisself.  The
    signal was fading in and out on me, but the lyrics went something like
    this:
    
    	"How many home run balls must a man give up
    	 Before he admits that he's through?
         The answer, my friend, he's blowin' it again...
         The answer he's blowin' it again..."
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1380 |  | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | Drink Canada Dry....I'm trying | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:09 | 40 | 
|  |     
    re: the flag incident
    
    President Bush apologized and more or less chastised the Marines,
    saying that if it happened the other way around (and the U.S. flag was
    upside down), the Americans would be very upset.
    
    CBS was careful not to show too many crowd shots....in case they caught
    some signs or T-shirts displaying the Stars and Stripes inverted. 
    There was one sign above the scoreboard that said, 
    "The U.S. Marines...the few...the proud....the dyslexic"
    
    
    re: the opening bit of the telecast
    
    I don't know how the Americans viewed it, but myself and a few other
    Canadians were a bit offended with the opening segment before the game.
    That was where one of the CBS reporters showed a bunch of kids playing
    catch and he says that it looks like baseball is finally catching on in
    Canada.  Then they show a closeup of the kids playing catch with a
    hockey puck.  Then he is in the airport going through customs, and the
    customs officer first speaks French (in Toronto....c'mon).  There was
    more chance of the customs officer wearing a turban than there was of
    him speaking French initially.
    Then this `reporter' mentions how cold it is in Canada to be playing
    baseball......wasn't there snow on the ground in Pittsburgh? 
    Minneapolis is north of Toronto, you know.
    The segment ends with the kids being shown again and the reporter says 
    that the kids are getting it right now.  One kid has in his hand `a
    real baseball'...wow!.  Then the camera pans to show a kid up to bat
    with a hockey stick and another kid dressed up as a goalie and acting
    as a catcher.
    
    I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
    public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
    bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know 
    how to play hockey.
    
    
    pete
 | 
| 3.1381 | Throw me down the stairs my hat. | SHARE::DERRY | Head is empty & talkin' trash... | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:20 | 8 | 
|  |     >I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
    >public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
    >bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know
    >how to play hockey.
    You mean everyone isn't a Bob and Doug clone?  (-: 
    /Don's a rube.	
 | 
| 3.1382 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:24 | 30 | 
|  | >    I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
>    public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
>    bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know 
>    how to play hockey.
    
Pete, 
You have to excuse our press.  Really.
Just imagine that probably half of the people in this country get
their "news" from tabloid publications such as "The Weekly World
News" (sample headline:  Ross Perot Meets with Space Alien), and you
see now why things like that happen.
The US Media can (unfortunately) turn things into a circus.
Actually, the press has reported some baseball stories in a constructive
manner (a recent story I saw on the emergence of baseball in Russia
for example).
Personally, having been to Canada several times, and knowing some
Canadians, I think Canada is a GREAT place, and it bugs me to see the
media acting in an un-neighborly fasion....
JMHO,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1383 | Eh | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:35 | 26 | 
|  |     Pete,
    That's pretty sad and ignorant. And we Americans wonder when people
    get upset at our stereotyping of others. And CBS just adding to that
    stereotype. I guess we in New England are lucky to live close enough
    to Canada to appreciate its beauty and the friendlinessof its people.
    I should expand that to all areas of the US that are close to the
    Canadian border. I've beem to Vancouver, Montreal, and to the general
    Toronto area and I can attest to the above statements.  Hell we
    older( wail not too old) Red Sox fans cam remember that the Bosox
    had a farm team in Toronto and the Dodger fans should realize that
    Montreal was one of their farm teams. And we know our neighbors to
    the north know baseball. 
    
    I got a kick out of a picture I saw in the local Boston paper. Two
    Jays fans with a T shirt depicting the US flag upside down with the
    caption " Sory, eh!"  Too funny. 
    
    Now let's forget all this stuff and play ball!
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S. I thought all the Canadians jest drank Canadian and Blue and
    rolled in the snow!  Mucho 8^)'s 
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.1384 |  | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Singing in Calgary on July 3rd | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:39 | 12 | 
|  |     >                                                       Hell we
    > older( wail not too old) Red Sox fans cam remember that the Bosox
    > had a farm team in Toronto and the Dodger fans should realize that
    > Montreal was one of their farm teams
    
    A few U.S. based major league teams still have minor league teams in
    Canada.  The Angels' triple-A team is in Edmonton, there's another
    Pacific Coast League team in Vancouver (White Sox?), and the Tigers'
    double-A team is in London, Ontario.
    
    
    py
 | 
| 3.1385 | 'member THAT one lEe?  ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:43 | 10 | 
|  |     Yabbut lest ya ferget,
    
    The firsted home run Babe Ruth ever hit was in Canada too!
    
    hth,
    
    I remain,
    a_historical_dastatistician_in_training
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1386 | A blue chicken?? | MR4DEC::WENTZELL | Just a little sweetness | Wed Oct 21 1992 10:47 | 14 | 
|  | 
Since I can't stand all the pre-game crap (sounds like I missed a great one 
last night - not) I make sure to check the paper for the game start time (not 
TV coverage start time) and don't tune in until then.  And I'm lucky that 
since I like Sean M and think Tim M is a ok color man, although he seems to be 
a little high on himself most of the time, I can deal with the game-time 
coverage.
I love Canada and Toronto, and have visited SkyDome for a game.  Impressivie 
stadium, although not really what I would consider suited to baseball.  But I 
gotta ask, what the heck is that blue chicken ya got up there running around 
in the stands!?!  I feel embarrassed for you Jays fans everytime I see it. 8^)
Scott
 | 
| 3.1387 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 11:05 | 20 | 
|  | Vancouver (eh) is one of the neatest places I've ever been to.
I've been to Montreal once and Sherbrooke once also, but I really liked
Vancouver (eh) the best.
The reason that I always put (eh) after Vancouver (eh), is because of the
two guys that JD and I met who were from Vancouver (eh), who always
said (eh) after they said Vancouver (eh).
Also, the Hartford Wanderers hosted the Vancouver (eh) KATS, a rugby team
from Vancouver (eh), and while a lot of the team hailed from New Zealand,
there were quite a few Canadians that I could talk too.
All this talk about Canada and Vancouver(eh) have me thinking about
a road trip.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1388 | go Jays! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Wed Oct 21 1992 12:14 | 16 | 
|  |     re: French speaking, etc.
    
    Agreed that a lot of American attitudes towards Canada are not that
    great. In all fairness to the French speaking issue, the biggest issue
    in Canada (at least one of them) over the last decade-15 years has been
    the issue of Quebec staying in or separating from Canada. A large part
    of that has to do with the French culture that differentiates Quebec
    from the other parts of Canada. So I can see where that misinformation
    comes from.
    
    The flag thing was really sad. You would think that in the US where the
    flag burning issue was a major issue - amendments and everything -
    people would take more care in respecting the flags of other countries.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1389 | Canadians are real people too | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Wed Oct 21 1992 12:15 | 5 | 
|  |     Canucks are ok, eh.  My mom and her whole side of her family are
    Hosers.  I used to spend some summers up in New Brunswick, eh.  Also
    been to Montreal and Toronto, eh, to visit relatives.  
    
    Mike eh
 | 
| 3.1390 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Jeff Rearend strikes again!! | Wed Oct 21 1992 12:26 | 7 | 
|  |     	All those people who said Gaston wasn't that sharp a manager
    must admit he pulled a slick one to get the Braves to put Rearend
    in the game.  I think CBS/MLB-WWF/CIA/FBI/MilitaryIndustrialComplex
    will want the Braves to tie this one up tonight, so look for lots
    of reaction shots of Ted and the accessory.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1391 | Dumb, just dumb... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 21 1992 13:13 | 17 | 
|  |     
    > All those people who said Gaston wasn't that sharp a manager
    > must admit he pulled a slick one to get the Braves to put Rearend
    > in the game.
    
    Gaston has clearly out-managed Cox but Cox blew this one on his own.
    He could have chosen to have Wohlers (or Stanton) to walk Olerud and 
    then used either one, his choice, to pitch to Maldonado.  His hand 
    wasn't forced; he was apparently hell-bent on using Reardon, with the
    bonus (not much of one) of having Olerud removed from the game.  My
    question at the time was did Cox really think he had so much depth and
    flexibility in his bullpen that he could waste Wohlers and Stanton so 
    casually in the unlikely event that Reardon did get out of that mess?
    Extra innings awaited... 
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1392 | Turned it into an art form | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Oct 21 1992 14:29 | 9 | 
|  |     
    You're Right,  Hosers are great people.  I grew up in northern Wisc.
    and had many friends and school mates that were from Canada.  Mostly
    their families were in Wisc. for work as loggers and construction as
    those were booming in the late `60's and early `70's.  
    
    BG
    
    And they sure no how to drink beer, too
 | 
| 3.1393 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 14:32 | 9 | 
|  | Hey, JD and I can tell you about a couple of guys from Vancouver (eh).
We had a good time drinking with them, and I know that as long as JD and
I live, we will ALWAYS be telling that story about our two homies from
Vancouver (eh).....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1394 |  | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:31 | 19 | 
|  |     Vancouver is a GREAT town.
    Went drivin' round Vancouver with me buddy BB ( you know of whom I
    speak, 'Saw), looking for a coupla sixpacks a cold Blue. Went
    into this here liquor store and saw no cold beer, only cases of
    warm beer arrayed on the floor. I asked the propriter where his
    cooler was that housed the cold suds. Ho looked at me strangely 
    ( probly trying to place my accent " Have any cold beeyah heeyah)
    and flat out told me I had to find a COLD BEER STORE to git cold
    beer, eh!  I said why did they ( Vancouverites) have a unnecessary
    thang ( in my mind) like a cold beer store and why didn't all
    liqour stores have a cooler where they could house cold beer,
    blah, blah, blah.  The hoser looked at me and said " Now, if
    we all sold cold beer, we wouldn't have any left, now would we
    eh."  That was enough fer me.
    
    Take off
    MikeL
    
    
 | 
| 3.1395 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:35 | 5 | 
|  | �The US Media can (unfortunately) turn things into a circus.
    
    The US has not cornered the market on this.  Just look at the stir in
    Great Britain over the alleged escapades of the royal family being
    published in the "newspapers" over there.
 | 
| 3.1396 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:42 | 7 | 
|  | >    The US has not cornered the market on this.  Just look at the stir in
>    Great Britain over the alleged escapades of the royal family being
>    published in the "newspapers" over there.
Amen.  
 | 
| 3.1397 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:49 | 22 | 
|  |     
    The Canadian media has had their fun with this World Series and the 
    flag thing in particular, too (glaring headlines decrying "Typical 
    Yank Ignorance", etc.).  Basically I think you're always going to have 
    some elements that take this kind of thing very seriously, and the 
    media will always be right alongside if there's any hint of controversy, 
    anywhere.  But I have a lot of respect for the way the fans present in 
    Toronto last night treated the whole affair.  I have a feeling that if 
    the roles had been reversed, in a lot of US cities the fans would have 
    booed the Canadian anthem, even out of fun, just for the hell of it.  I 
    don't think the average American is that respectful of such institutions.
    Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, I guess.  Myself,
    I'm a hat-over-heart kinda guy, but I'd just as soon see the national
    anthems at sporting events done away with.
                                    
    I saw where President Bush did something that no national politician
    would ever dream of doing under normal circumstances-- he donned a
    Braves' jacket and declared himself behind Atlanta 100%.  No danger of
    losing votes in Ontario, you see...
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.1398 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:53 | 13 | 
|  | >    I saw where President Bush did something that no national politician
>    would ever dream of doing under normal circumstances-- he donned a
>    Braves' jacket and declared himself behind Atlanta 100%.  No danger of
>    losing votes in Ontario, you see...
    
George:
	Yep.  I did it.  Felt it would be prudent at this juncture.
	Backing Torawna would be BAD, BAD.  Backing Atlanta is
	good for America.
	God Bless the Atlanta Braves!
 | 
| 3.1399 | Want change? - 13 days and counting | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Wed Oct 21 1992 16:09 | 4 | 
|  |     SNL strikes again :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1400 |  | FDCV06::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Thu Oct 22 1992 08:14 | 4 | 
|  |     So... how about them Braves.. Looks like thay don't know how to
    play baseball indoors...
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.1401 | Dying for some news | MACNAS::PRIDGE | Chicago Blackhawks Stanley Cup Finalists '92 | Thu Oct 22 1992 08:53 | 3 | 
|  |     
    So what was the score? I am stuck over here in Ireland.
                                                              Pat
 | 
| 3.1402 | Toronto 2, Atlanta 1 | LJOHUB::MFFL::Straub | ...salsa, selzer... | Thu Oct 22 1992 09:02 | 1 | 
|  | 
 | 
| 3.1403 | Thanks | MACNAS::PRIDGE | Chicago Blackhawks Stanley Cup Finalists '92 | Thu Oct 22 1992 09:29 | 4 | 
|  |     
    Jane better get some new prayers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                                    Pat
    
 | 
| 3.1404 | Go Jays! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:06 | 15 | 
|  |     Some details:
    
    Pat Borders hit a HR to give Jays a 1-0 lead. In the 7th, Devon White
    singled with 2 outs and Gruber on 2nd for a 2-0 lead.
    
    Meanwhile Galvine and Key were both pitching very well.
    
    In the 8th. Braves got a lead off double, bunt single, bunt pop-out.
    Groundball that Gruber made a great play on, runner out at first, one
    run in. Ward came in got a strikeout, ball went by the catcher. Runers
    on 1st and 3rd, next batter flied out.
    Henke set the Braves down 1-2-3 in the 9th.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1405 | These guys want to win... | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:25 | 7 | 
|  | Gotta love Gruber and White.  There are two guys who give 100% all the time.  
Can you imagine Wade Boggs on that switch-direction-charge play in the 8th?  He
woulda been lucky to get a hand on the thing.
Looks like Toronto's year.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1406 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:42 | 9 | 
|  | 	Major faux pas last night, worse than the UpsideDownFlag incident.
The Braves dressing room got the Blue Jays script and visa versa.  When you 
saw Cito on the phone last night it was the CBS production crew trying to 
tell Gaston to have Henke serve 'em up, but Cito having a hearing problem 
thought he meant warm 'em up so he ignored the directive.  Right now the 
head writer is being summoned from his vacation in Bimini to rewrite the 
entire World Series miniseries.
				/Don
 | 
| 3.1407 | pondering da future....... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:55 | 17 | 
|  |     
    Yabbut I figure this could also go in the Q&A note, or Inquiries a'la
    JaKe but I decided to put it here instead.  So there!
    
    Lasted night during the 9th inning, I began to wonder and ponder
    this little thought (I occasionally have little one's doncha know).
    
    So if'n the Blue Jays win the World Series, will they be invited to da
    WHite House?  By whom?
    
    hep moi!
    
    I remain,
    Interested in dis cause there's no historical precedent!
    Kev
    
    
 | 
| 3.1408 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:03 | 12 | 
|  |     
     Yup, Hotlanta seemed to think all they had to do was show up and
    accept the trophy. As Gomer Pyle used to say, "Surprise ! Surprise !
    Surprise !" Toronto has pretty darn near everything going for them.
    They have the pitching, timely hitting and they have the not insign-
    ificant element of luck. It would seem to be all over but the crying 
    then again stranger things have happened on the way to Balfour's. 
    Toronto,who's fans just exude class, is fortunate to have guys like 
    Carter and Winfield and Key in the clubhouse though because those guys
    are going to keep everyone else from going out and getting fitted for 
    rings this afternoon - it *is* a seven game series. At least for Hotlanta's 
    sake I hope it is.
 | 
| 3.1409 |  | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:15 | 5 | 
|  |     I'm Jumping ship now...  Go Jays !!!
    
    :^J
    
    BG
 | 
| 3.1410 | Off to England ! | KAOFS::R_OBAS |  | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:24 | 7 | 
|  |     Re: Kev,
    
       In today's local paper's editorial the question is exactly like
    yours.
     THE ANSWER:
       The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
    ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
 | 
| 3.1411 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:38 | 10 | 
|  |     
   >>   In today's local paper's editorial the question is exactly like
   >> yours.
   >> THE ANSWER:
   >>   The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
   >> ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
    
      Is that for real or is it just speculation ? I'm rooting for the Jays
      myself but I wouldn't think the Queen could care less if they won much  
      less be bothered meeting them. 
 | 
| 3.1412 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:46 | 11 | 
|  | 
    While Canada will undoubtedly have their own ceremony, I think it would
    be entirely appropriate for the President to invite the Jays to the
    White House, too.  Most of the players are US citizens, for one thing,
    and it'd be dishonorable to make an exception, for another.  'Course 
    Bush has backed himself into the corner with this Braves thing, even 
    likening his campaign to the Braves' NLCS comeback.  Big mistake, 
    George.  That was only the primary...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1413 | Of course it's only a joke ! | KAOFS::R_OBAS |  | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:50 | 8 | 
|  |     
     No it's not for real I don't think so . As I was saying , Kev has same 
    question in todays editorial (local) Are  the J's going to be
    invited to the White House by whom if' they win the W.S. ? The editor
    made an assumption that they will not be invited so just made a joke
    that the J's will instead head for England to visit the queen.
    
      
 | 
| 3.1414 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:57 | 8 | 
|  |     
    I thought all the winners went to Disneyland.
    
    Probably a lot more fun with Mickey and Minnie than Pres. George or the
    Queen.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1415 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:18 | 8 | 
|  |  
    >>  -< Of course it's only a joke ! >-
    
     Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle ! Could have been for real
     for all I know. Personally, I think Michael Jordan has the right idea 
     about meeting the heads of state - go golfing instead.
      
    
 | 
| 3.1416 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:40 | 6 | 
|  | >     Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle !
The imagery this conjures up is sobering at best   ;^)      
    
 | 
| 3.1417 |  | KAOFS::R_OBAS |  | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:44 | 5 | 
|  |     
       << Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle >>
    
      Nah ! I don't think so....
    
 | 
| 3.1418 | You're a Sick, Sick, Sick Man | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 22 1992 14:56 | 10 | 
|  |     Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
 | 
| 3.1419 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:43 | 6 | 
|  | �Gotta love Gruber and White.  There are two guys who give 100% all the time.  
�Can you imagine Wade Boggs on that switch-direction-charge play in the 8th?  He
�woulda been lucky to get a hand on the thing.
    
    You mean that same Kelly Gruber who's error on a fairly routine ball to
    3rd the other night led to an Atlanta victory?
 | 
| 3.1420 |  | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:46 | 5 | 
|  | �    You mean that same Kelly Gruber who's error on a fairly routine ball to
�    3rd the other night led to an Atlanta victory?
Yea, same guy - everyone makes errors, at least Gruber is aggressive in 
the field.
 | 
| 3.1421 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:47 | 9 | 
|  |     
  >>  You mean that same Kelly Gruber who's error on a fairly routine ball to
                                      ^^^^^
    
      That should be "whose".
    
    
       _Tommy Brydie for Bob McCullough for John Hendry
           
 | 
| 3.1422 | Shoot, I'm slippin' | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey AND Melanie's dad | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:48 | 0 | 
| 3.1423 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:52 | 11 | 
|  |     
    >>   The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
    >>ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
    
    Why should they want to visit with David Bowie???????
    
    
    Schnort Schitt Schleps
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1424 | Oh what coulda been | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Thu Oct 22 1992 15:56 | 10 | 
|  |     I gots to believe that, if it hadn't been fer Leyland's brain cramp and
    subsequent inserting of Stan "I cain't hold a freakin' lead" Belinda
    into the line-up lasted Wednesday, and the Bucs would've won instead of
    everybody in Pgh wanting to break off Belinda's right arm and shove it
    up his a..,this series would be at 2-2 right now, heading for a 7 game 
    showdown, instead of Atlanta playing a pretty weak excuse fer baseball.
    
    JMHO
                                                  
    JaKe
 | 
| 3.1425 |  | DECWET::METZGER | �(���)�   Hi, I'm Ross Perot... | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:00 | 15 | 
|  | 
Atlanta isn't playing bad baseball. The jays are playing better ball.
Cox is being out managed. Atlanta won games all year long by having 
some of the best pitching in the league. I fully expected their staff
to hold Toronto down to 3 runs a game or less....I did not expect
the Toronto pitching to be so solid that it is holding atlanta to
under 2 runs a game.
Do you honestly think that the Pirates hitting would be scoring
mega runs against the Toronto staff? You can't think that the 
Pittsburgh staff could do as well as Atlanta's in styming the bats
of Toronto?
Metz
 | 
| 3.1426 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Is Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude?? | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:03 | 7 | 
|  |     After watching the Bucs all year long, I gots ta think the Bucs would
    scored more runs than the pathetic Braves have.
    
    IMHO
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1427 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:07 | 12 | 
|  | 
     Jake, one can only hope that you'll use your psychic powers
    for good and not evil.
    'Saw probably knows *exactly* how the quote goes but it goes
    a little something like this, [anna one anna two] "Of all the
    words of tongue and pen the saddest are these; what might have 
    been."
    
 | 
| 3.1428 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:26 | 27 | 
|  | >     Jake, one can only hope that you'll use your psychic powers
>    for good and not evil.
Jake, give in to your hate and let it flow within you.  
Come with me to the Dark Side of the Force......
Jake, I am your Father.....
Darth_Chaisaw
>    'Saw probably knows *exactly* how the quote goes but it goes
>    a little something like this, [anna one anna two] "Of all the
>    words of tongue and pen the saddest are these; what might have 
>    been."
Sorry, Tommy, but I cain't come any closer than you.   Next acquisition
for the office cube here is a quotation dictionary.....
'Saw
    
 | 
| 3.1429 | No sour grapes, Braves are better; just would've been fun | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:30 | 16 | 
|  |     
    Pittsburgh's hitting might be better (they outscored the Braves in the
    regular season and in the playoffs, and lit up everyone not named
    Smoltz), but it's also likely their pitching would have been even 
    worse, maybe even the bullpen (Belinda > Reardon?).
    
    Still, what I wouldn't have given to see the kid Timmy Wakefield
    dancing that flutterball up to the plate for *three games* and 
    spinning guys like Winfield and Carter into the ground.  At the very 
    least, it would have been fun, and it could have been a hell of a 
    story.  I'll admit that I was already visualizing this whole
    circumstance and the matchups before the ball was squeezed for the
    third out...
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.1430 |  | CELTIK::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!!! | Thu Oct 22 1992 17:27 | 28 | 
|  |     Tommy and Saw, younze guy is too much.
    
    
    I will not give in, though, on my feelings about the Bucs until
    Pittsburgh goes thru its spring thaw, and the knuckleball flies on
    opening day.
    
    I agree also with Glenn, that I was envisioning Wakefield's dancer in
    the Skydome, moving in more directions than my wife's car when she's
    driving on ice.
    
    
    Sigh, 
    sitting here waiting til nexted year, like I have the two previous
    seasons, also, but wonderiing if the Bucs cain find some more unlikely
    heroes to continue holding the seat at the top of the division.
    
    BTW, I read somewhere(surely not a newspaper in Pgh., though) that all
    of the analcysts are saying that Leyland made 3, count 'em, 3, mistakes
    in Atlanta.  One was letting Drabek go as far as he did into the ninth,
    number two was bringing in Belinda, a known high ball pitcher, when
    what the Bucs needed was a ground ball, and as for the third, my mind
    just went blank on that one, damn.  Oh well, If'n I remember it I'll
    get it in here later.
    
    JaKe
    
    
 | 
| 3.1431 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Thu Oct 22 1992 17:41 | 11 | 
|  | 
>    I will not give in, though, on my feelings about the Bucs until
>    Pittsburgh goes thru its spring thaw, and the knuckleball flies on
>    opening day.
Jake, don't give in.  That only leads to the Dark Side of the Force.....
Obi-Wan Chainsaw
    
 | 
| 3.1432 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Is Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude?? | Fri Oct 23 1992 00:05 | 8 | 
|  |     Oh great, Atlanta wins and now we gotta watch the PeeWee Herman
    wannabees doing their wank motion whilst sounding like a cow trying to
    pass a London Bus!!!!
    
    Go Toronto!!!
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1433 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 23 1992 09:12 | 14 | 
|  | 
    > Oh great, Atlanta wins and now we gotta watch the PeeWee Herman
    > wannabees doing their wank motion whilst sounding like a cow trying to
    > pass a London Bus!!!!
    
    Tough call between that and watching thousands of Canadian flags
    twirling amidst the jubilant Toronto crowd (hey, I'm a Boston Red Sox
    fan; those Toronto fans have class but I just can't bring myself to
    like it).  Those folks really came out expecting to win last night, I
    think.  The Jays winning in Ted and Janey's playpen sounds like the best
    deal to me...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1434 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 23 1992 09:29 | 5 | 
|  |     
     I would much rather have seen the Jays win last night. It just never
    seems right when the players go nuts on the last out and the fans in 
    the stands are bumming. Not to mention the fun outside the stadium
    when all those exuberant fans hit the streets.
 | 
| 3.1435 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 23 1992 09:31 | 2 | 
|  |     I just knew Morris was due for a blowout.  The Jays can't get the run
    support against those Atlanta starters that Morris needs these days.
 | 
| 3.1436 | a big ole chicken bone | GENRAL::WADE |  | Fri Oct 23 1992 09:40 | 4 | 
|  |     
    	I loved watching CBS choke on their pregame show.....
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.1437 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:32 | 6 | 
|  |     
    Are you talking about last nights pre-game show? I missed it, how'd CBS
    choke??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1438 |  | GENRAL::WADE |  | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:56 | 6 | 
|  |     
    	Ayup.  They were gushing on and on about the Jays.  Nothing
    	but interviews with them and nothing on the Braves.  At
    	least what I caught anyway.......
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.1439 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:59 | 4 | 
|  |     	Claybroon, none of the Braves wanted to be interviewed because
    they were busy reading the script for last night's game.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1440 | sweep the last 2 | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:06 | 6 | 
|  |     Nice to see hired gun Jack $. Morri$ is now 0-2 against the Braves this
    year.  Too bad he couldn't pitch the next 2 games.
    
    Go Braves!  Win it for REAL baseball.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 3.1441 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:11 | 6 | 
|  |     
    What do you folks out in Arizona know about any baseball, much less
    real baseball?? mucho :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1442 |  | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:14 | 5 | 
|  |     
    Name another state where there is a professional baseball league goping
    on right now.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1443 | not allowed on pro teams here | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:15 | 1 | 
|  |     Cuz we don't use designated geeks.  
 | 
| 3.1444 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93-JaKe's p-name to be | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:52 | 6 | 
|  |     re: .1442
    
    Georgia!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1445 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 29 1992 09:18 | 6 | 
|  |     
  >> Only more evidence that the game demands more smarts and skill. 
   
     So Glenn, in what ways does baseball require "more smarts" than 
     the other three major sports ?    
    
 | 
| 3.1446 |  | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 29 1992 09:28 | 9 | 
|  |     Don't take no jeenyus to figger out that it is evidently nore smart
    not to put your life and limb on the line playing the major contact
    sports like Fussball and hockey. 
    Then again I've seen "smart" baseball men step up to the plate to git
    drilled by a 90 MPH fastball fer the team ( good luck in Colorady, Don)
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
 | 
| 3.1447 | Get Smart! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Thu Oct 29 1992 09:40 | 31 | 
|  |     
    Is it smart to run into a wall at full speed to catch a fly ball?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to hit a pop fly causing a double play?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to miss a bunt sign?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to throw a wild pitch?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to be on the receiving end of incoming spiked shoes?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to position yerself to lose a ball in the lights?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to get into fights in a barroom?
    Nope!
    
    
    hth!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    shortly smart?
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1448 | With hand over heart, with liberty and justice for all... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 29 1992 10:23 | 36 | 
|  |     
  >> Only more evidence that the game demands more smarts and skill. 
   
   >  So Glenn, in what ways does baseball require "more smarts" than 
   >  the other three major sports ?    
    
    Primarily in the mental battle between the pitcher and batter.  In 
    baseball, *all* players must ultimately participate in this 
    confrontation, on one side or the other.  "Smarts" might not be the 
    best choice of words, so call it mental concentration, or whatever.  
    But the fact remains that the ability to hit a pitched baseball from 
    varying directions and speeds remains one of the most exacting and 
    elusive tasks in sports.  There is no standard physical predictor to 
    assess whether a person might be potentially successful at the task-- 
    such as football's 40-yard-dash time and on-hoof tonnage requirement, 
    or basketball's vertical leap and unwritten height rule (at the vast 
    majority of positions), or hockey's whatever-it-is-that-hockey-
    players-do (skate fast, I guess).  The reason for this is that, quite 
    simply, 90% of the task of hitting a baseball is in the mind, and 
    therefore 90% of pitching is also, in predicting what a hitter is 
    thinking and responding accordingly.
    
    In other sports, there may be positions such as quarterback or point 
    guard which are as mentally demanding, but specialization allows that
    not everyone must master them.  Let's face it, for 99% of us the 
    physical requirements of football and basketball eliminate, at a very
    young age, the chance that we could ever participate at the highest 
    levels in those sports.  Hand a kid a ball, bat and glove and give him 
    the proper instruction, though, and if he's got the ability to block 
    out the pressures of baseball's ultimate one-on-one confrontation and 
    maintain the highest levels of concentration throughout, he stands as 
    good a chance as any other of playing in the big leagues. 
    
    glenn
    
           
 | 
| 3.1449 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Thu Oct 29 1992 11:22 | 8 | 
|  | Great note Waugamain!
Just want to point out that if we were born and bred Kiwis, you could
write almost the same thing about rugby.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1450 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 29 1992 11:26 | 15 | 
|  |     >> Hand a kid a ball, bat and glove and give him the proper instruction, 
    >> though, and if he's got the ability to block out the pressures of 
    >> baseball's ultimate one-on-one confrontation and maintain the highest 
    >> levels of concentration throughout, he stands as good a chance as any 
    >> other of playing in the big leagues. 
    
       Ain't seen prose that purple since I don't know when. Hitting a base-
       ball IS probably the hardest thing to do in all of sport but I don't
       buy that it's "90% mental". Kirby Pucket and Barry Bonds ain't the
       best hitters in the game because they're the smartest or the best
       concentrators. They're the best because they can put bat on ball and 
       drive it. Baseball players don't have anymore ability to concentrate 
       than football players or basketball players or golfers or canasta
       players and certainly not more than boxers.
    
 | 
| 3.1451 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Oct 29 1992 14:14 | 27 | 
|  |     
   >    Ain't seen prose that purple since I don't know when.
    
    Hey, I aim to please.
    
   >    Baseball players don't have anymore ability to concentrate 
   >    than football players or basketball players or golfers or canasta
   >    players and certainly not more than boxers.
        
    Let's try logical deduction here.  Forget about the 90% number.  If it 
    is *not* the case that hitting a baseball requires more mental
    concentration per unit of physical ability than stopping an onrushing
    defensive lineman or blocking a jump shot, then why are the positions
    that specialize in these tasks excluded to persons of very specific 
    physical body types?
    
    >   Kirby Pucket and Barry Bonds ain't the
    >   best hitters in the game because they're the smartest or the best
    >   concentrators.  They're the best because they can put bat on ball 
    >   and drive it. 
                                     
    It's a very large part of it.  Both the skills of putting the bat on 
    the ball and being able to drive it are much more technique-based than 
    physical.
    
    glenn
              
 | 
| 3.1452 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Thu Oct 29 1992 14:57 | 28 | 
|  |         
  >> Let's try logical deduction here.  Forget about the 90% number.  If it 
  >> is *not* the case that hitting a baseball requires more mental
  >> concentration per unit of physical ability than stopping an onrushing
  >> defensive lineman or blocking a jump shot, then why are the positions
  >> that specialize in these tasks excluded to persons of very specific 
  >> physical body types?
    
    
      We'll forget the 90% number but only because it's totally indefens-
     ible. You seem to be drawing a corllary between physical size and 
     mental ability and I have to disagree with you. Blocking an onrushing 
     defensive lineman or swatting a jumpshot isn't purely physical or else 
     anyone of the proper size and strength could do it. And that isn't the 
     case. There is a high degree of concentration and technique involved in 
     both of those things. Let your mind wander or take the wrong tack and 
     you're dogmeat. Hitting is the same way. Much of it is technique but much 
     of it is a high degree of hand eye coordination - perhaps more than any 
     other major sport  save hockey. There's a large physical element. It's 
     just a different kind of physical.
 
      This all got started because of a statement by Metz that baseball is 
     the only sport where a Charlie Hough could play at his age or a Kent 
     Hrbek could play in the physical condition he does. And Metz was 100% 
     right. They can still play not because they're Rhodes Scholars but be-
     cause baseball demands a very special set of physical skills and endur-
     ance and foot speed aren't two of them.                  
    
 | 
| 3.1453 |  | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bush, just rasied taxes again. what a guy | Thu Oct 29 1992 15:14 | 7 | 
|  | 
What no name calling? No personal insults? No na-na-na-na chanting? What kind
of ::Sports discussion is this???
;^)
seriously, Bravo! Tommy and Glenn...it's been great reading from the beachers
 | 
| 3.1454 | It's sad, ain't it MikeC... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnder | Thu Oct 29 1992 15:16 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1455 | I KNOW 90% Sir! And you are *NOT* Ninety per-cent! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Thu Oct 29 1992 15:47 | 14 | 
|  |     
    Just a nit,
    
    I luv this 90% stuff being bantered all around.  Pure Bunk, I say!!!!!
    
    Last time I checked, it's been what 30-40 years since anybody hit
    better than 40% (.400), right?
    
    Sorta changes the arguement, wouldn't you say?????
    
    I remain,
    always amazed by datistics!(tm)
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1456 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Thu Oct 29 1992 15:52 | 18 | 
|  |     Boxing, now there's a "sport" that takes the ultimate in smarts to get
    into, huh???
    
    Takes an IQ of 150 or above to be able to step into the ring and get
    your brain stem seperated from the rest of your brain and spend the
    rest of your life(how short it may be) imitating broccoli or
    cauliflower.  Or better yet, get your haid beaten around so much it
    turns your brain into mush in your later years in life so when you try
    to speak, you sound like you're under the influence of multiple cases
    of Jack Daniels.  
    
    Yeah, what "smarts" boxing commands to ba able to participate.  What's
    Tyson's IQ, maybe 33 on a good day????
    
    Schnort Schitt Schlepps
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1457 |  | DECWET::METZGER | �(���)�   Everbuddy iz out to git me | Thu Oct 29 1992 16:20 | 17 | 
|  | 
Not smarts Jake...concentration...We've all seen what happens to
a boxer when their concentration slips for 2 seconds...POW and
you're done...
I'd say that football requires more intelligence than baseball. 
Those guys have to remember the play and adjust during a short time
span...just because the game requires physical mutants doesn't 
mean they lack intelligence. Baseball requires a higher degree of
concentration rather than intelligence...catchers are about the
only players required to have smarts on a baseball team....
Golf is a quantum leap above any of the major team sports requiring
intelligence.
Metz
 | 
| 3.1458 | Uh duh was that the Bell????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Todd Marinovich = Tony Eason..... | Thu Oct 29 1992 16:22 | 9 | 
|  |     
    
             Yup thats Smarts Jake. Get beat up for 36 minutes and get paid
    6-12 Mil.
    
            Geez when I was in the Navy I got beat up by a marine for about
    that long and he didn't pay me nuthin.  :-)
    
    Chap(PY)
 | 
| 3.1459 |  | FDCV06::KING |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 07:16 | 3 | 
|  |     Het CHappy, those women Marines are tought.... :-}
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.1460 | Dohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Todd Marinovich = Tony Eason..... | Fri Oct 30 1992 07:37 | 5 | 
|  |     
    
           Yes she was......
    
    Chappy.
 | 
| 3.1461 | The more that can play, the higher the mental differentiator | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 11:04 | 45 | 
|  |          
     > We'll forget the 90% number but only because it's totally indefens-
     > ible.
    
    No, it's totally unmeasurable.  There is no known test for separating
    physical aspects from mental aspects and weighing their relative
    contributions to a performed task.  I was throwing out a number for
    argumentative purposes, not to be taken literally.
    
     > You seem to be drawing a corllary between physical size and 
     > mental ability and I have to disagree with you. 
    
    Absolutely not.  I haven't implied anything like that.  What I've said 
    is that the physical requirements for football and basketball eliminate 
    99.9% of the male population from consideration for performing these 
    tasks at a professional level, right off the top.  Let's say by 
    comparison the physical requirements (eyesight, strength) for hitting 
    a baseball eliminate 90%.  This leaves conservatively 100 times more 
    potential "physical" qualifiers for professional baseball than for 
    football and basketball.  In which sport are the non-physical aspects 
    (mental concentration, intelligence in the context of the sport) 
    going to play a larger part in separating the best performers in the
    world from the average Joe?  By logical deduction, the sport that has 
    the lowest physical requirements, the one that allows more average 
    Joes, separated only by mental aspects, a shot at the top.
    
    Or to put it in simpler terms, in horse racing the best jockeys are 
    still only the smartest mentally-tough men under 5'0", 110 lbs, not the 
    smartest metally-tough men period.
    
    > Hitting is the same way. Much of it is technique but much 
    > of it is a high degree of hand eye coordination - perhaps more than any 
    > other major sport  save hockey. There's a large physical element. It's 
    > just a different kind of physical.
    
    It doesn't sound like we really disagree.  Hand-eye coordination is
    mostly if not totally another term for mental concentration (it still
    doesn't cover the guessing-game part to hitting and pitching, though, 
    which doesn't seem to be getting much credit in here-- thousands more
    applicants possess the ability to hit fastballs they know are coming).  
    Hand-eye coordination has little to do with the hand or the eye, but 
    mostly to do with the mind.
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1462 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 11:26 | 20 | 
|  |     
    > This all got started because of a statement by Metz that baseball is 
    > the only sport where a Charlie Hough could play at his age or a Kent 
    > Hrbek could play in the physical condition he does. And Metz was 100% 
    > right. They can still play not because they're Rhodes Scholars but be-
    > cause baseball demands a very special set of physical skills and endur-
    > ance and foot speed aren't two of them.                  
    
    Just one last point here on "The Slob", Charlie Hough.  Film studies
    have shown that a knuckleball pitcher requires the finest mechanics of 
    all pitchers.  Throwing a knuckleball is not simply a case of grabbing
    a ball with a different grip and throwing it up there and discovering
    that it works.  Every mechanical slip-up translates into a potential
    400-foot home run, and it's very difficult to throw strikes with the
    thing in the first place.  This is another skill that I consider to be 
    mostly mental, but I guess could possibly be semantically described as 
    "physical".
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1463 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 30 1992 11:30 | 11 | 
|  | Just like software blurs into hardware through a gray area of microcode,
so does the brains "thought" of an action when it becomes the action.
Pitching, the short game in golf, and other things I've probably not mentioned,
are, in my mind, a combination of concentration, and mind-control of
important physio-mechanical things.....
JMHO,
'SAw
 | 
| 3.1464 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 30 1992 11:30 | 6 | 
|  |     I have to question Metz' rating of the intelligence required of the
    average football player.  I've played football, and believe me, it
    wasn't that mentally taxing.  You're always told exactly what to do. 
    The toughest thing might be to memorize the plays that are being sent
    in by the coaching staff.  Blocking schemes overlap for many of the
    plays.
 | 
| 3.1465 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 30 1992 12:16 | 3 | 
|  |     
     Still don't agree with you Glenn but this argument is beginning to 
    take on an ugly "Dean Smithian " futility.
 | 
| 3.1466 | More food for thought... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 12:38 | 10 | 
|  |             
    Here's another angle: why does it take the average baseball player
    more years of training at the college and professional levels to reach
    a major-league level of proficiency?  Why do pitchers with great stuff,
    even the greatest pitchers ever, almost without exception come into the 
    big leagues and perform poorly (the same is also true of most young
    hitters)?
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.1467 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Fri Oct 30 1992 12:46 | 3 | 
|  |     ...because they're not as skilled as athletes as players in other
    sports?
                                    Denny
 | 
| 3.1468 |  | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 13:02 | 20 | 
|  |     
    > ...because they're not as skilled as athletes as players in other
    > sports?
    
    Whether they are or they're not, I'm talking about the difference in
    performance between a rookie (often a 25-year-old rookie) and a 
    five-year veteran.  If they're not skilled when they come in somehow
    they get skilled, or at least "much more skilled" (if you still don't 
    believe them to be ;-).  Or on the other side, if athletes in other 
    sports are required to be equally skilled mentally, why don't they 
    generally show the same leaps of improvement with major-league 
    experience (specialized positions like quarterback, point guard, goalie 
    excepted)?
    
    Or are 22-year-old basketball and football players *more* mentally 
    prepared for the big leagues?  That's one possible explanation, the
    other being the demands of the sports...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1469 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Fri Oct 30 1992 13:08 | 5 | 
|  |        Athletes in the other sports usually play at a high level in
    college. This is like 4 years in the minor leagues. In some cases,
    a much higher level than the baseball minors.
    
                                 Denny
 | 
| 3.1470 | The Squared Circle | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Calling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.Howard | Fri Oct 30 1992 13:18 | 7 | 
|  | All this talk about what sport requires greater athletic ability, football
or baseball is BS.  Any true sports fan knows that Professional Wrestlers are 
the greatest athletes in the world.   Right, REK ?
HTH,
Chap�
 | 
| 3.1471 |  | FDCV06::KING |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 15:17 | 3 | 
|  |     Oh yeah... Right...
    
    REK
 | 
| 3.1472 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 30 1992 15:18 | 7 | 
|  | Well, I have seen some things in the squared circle that are pretty
athletic.
The strenght factor alone can be impressive at times.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1473 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Fri Oct 30 1992 15:44 | 6 | 
|  |     
     "My name is Barry Bonds and when I'm not using my incredible powers
      of concentration to hit baseballs - I can usually be found bending 
      spoons, boring holes in concrete or freaking my dog out by moving 
      his dish. All with the power of my amazing brain. Kreskin ? He's a
      punk."
 | 
| 3.1474 | ...and golf is *NOT* a sport! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnder | Fri Oct 30 1992 15:55 | 0 | 
| 3.1475 | golf spelled backwards might be | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Oct 30 1992 15:58 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1476 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Fri Oct 30 1992 16:01 | 4 | 
|  | 
	I think ya hear me knockin', I think I'm comin' in,
	and I'm bringin' Barry and his big bad brain with me!
 | 
| 3.1477 | Only for Slob fains Mike! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnder | Fri Oct 30 1992 16:02 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1478 | Barry da main! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Fri Oct 30 1992 17:14 | 5 | 
|  |     
    You callin' Barry dumb, Tommy?  That won't score points wif me either!
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1479 |  | DECWET::METZGER | �(���)�   Everbuddy iz out to git me | Fri Oct 30 1992 18:08 | 18 | 
|  | 
You may have played football Mac but I doubt you've ever had to know a 
Bill Walsh or a Mouse Davis caliber offense...Even remembering the plays
is more intelligence than the average baseball player needs...with a 70%
chance of failure at every at bat there can't be too much intelligance 
involved :-)
Glen..next you'll be telling me that Hough is in excellent shape and it
just appears that he's about to drop dead at any moment...what other sport
can you pan into the bench/dugout and see a coach killing himself with
a cigarette or players generating mouth cancer cells by the thousands...
Yep..them baseball players are real intelligent :-)
Co-ordinated? Yes..intelligent...I don't think so...
Metz
 | 
| 3.1480 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Nov 02 1992 09:44 | 14 | 
|  |     
    >> You callin' Barry dumb, Tommy?  
    
      Not at all. Just remarking on his amazing powers of concentration
      which are not unlike those of the great eastern mystics under whom 
      he studied. When he goes into that trance just before the pitch is
      delivered and his eyes roll back in his head and you can see him
      mouth the words, "Be the ball". It's chilling. As a matter of fact 
      I'm surprised more clubs don't drop their hitting coaches in favor 
      of mentalists. 
        
              
    
    
 | 
| 3.1481 | Both non-athletic and dumb...that's why they make the $3M... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Nov 02 1992 09:45 | 14 | 
|  | 
> Glen..next you'll be telling me that Hough is in excellent shape and it
> just appears that he's about to drop dead at any moment..
    
    No, not at all.  He's a slob.  This is the whole point, though.  It
    wasn't me who started this thread by claiming that baseball players 
    aren't "athletes".  Well, at the highest average salaries in sports,
    with no shortage of willing candidates from all over North America to 
    take his or any other "non-athletic" player's job away, the guy's still 
    around.  So if he's not an "athlete", he's around for some other reason, 
    then.  What is that reason?  You can't have it both ways...
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1482 | Now if they could find a cure for Matt Young... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Mon Nov 02 1992 09:46 | 9 | 
|  |     
      > As a matter of fact        
      > I'm surprised more clubs don't drop their hitting coaches in favor 
      > of mentalists.                                 
    
    It worked for John Smoltz!  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
 | 
| 3.1483 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Nov 02 1992 09:58 | 2 | 
|  |     
       Sports psychologists aren't exclusive to baseball.
 | 
| 3.1484 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:11 | 16 | 
|  |     
    >> Well, at the highest average salaries in sports, with no shortage of 
    >> willing candidates from all over North America to take his or any other
    >> "non-athletic" player's job away, the guy's still around. 
    
        It's not exactly news that baseball has long been losing the best
        athletes to football and basketball. Most really good athletes find
        a sport where you spend the vast majority of the time waiting for 
        something to happen, even when you're on the field, boring. Charlie
        has mastered a few skills unique to baseball. It's that simple.
        He's no genius any more than most middle linebackers (maybe the 
        most intense creatures in sport) are. 
    
        I thought this string was dead.    
    
    
 | 
| 3.1485 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:18 | 14 | 
|  | �You may have played football Mac but I doubt you've ever had to know a 
�Bill Walsh or a Mouse Davis caliber offense...Even remembering the plays
�is more intelligence than the average baseball player needs
    
    There may be a lot of plays, but for the line they are all either pass
    block, runblock right, runblock left, runblock straight, pull right,
    pull left.  You're told where the ball is going.  It isn't too tough to
    remember where you are supposed to go.
    
�Most really good athletes find
�        a sport where you spend the vast majority of the time waiting for 
�        something to happen, even when you're on the field, boring. 
    
    Then why do they choose football?
 | 
| 3.1486 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:34 | 17 | 
|  | >    Then why do they choose football?
For what it's worth, it's my opinion that there are few athletes who
have the opportunity to make a conscious choice.
MOST athletes who make the big leagues have played that sport for years,
and while they may have played other sports, they play that one sport
because it is their favorite.   I'd say there are very few people who
have to make a choice between football and hoops, or baseball and hoops,
or football and baseball.   There are even fewer like Bo and Deion.
The majority of athletes play their favorite sport and see how far it
gets them......
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1487 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Nov 02 1992 10:52 | 13 | 
|  | 
 >> For what it's worth, it's my opinion that there are few athletes who
 >> have the opportunity to make a conscious choice.
 >> MOST athletes who make the big leagues have played that sport for years,
 >> and while they may have played other sports, they play that one sport
 >> because it is their favorite.   
    
    With all due respect, these two statements seem to contardict each
    other. If it's their "favorite" then they must have made a conscious
    decision to play it. No ?
    
    
 | 
| 3.1488 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Mon Nov 02 1992 11:43 | 38 | 
|  | >    With all due respect, these two statements seem to contardict each
>    other. If it's their "favorite" then they must have made a conscious
>    decision to play it. No ?
Well, not really.
I guess what I'm getting at, is that around here, kids starts playing
sports really early.   Most parents let their kids play a lot of different
sports (baseball, soccer, football, hockey, lacrosse), and they usually
develop a favorite.   That tends to be their sport of choice.
Kids don't really grasp some of the issues we've been talking about
until they are late into high school.
"Choosing" a sport like baseball, where you might get a lot of years
of playing in, as opposed to hockey, where the average career is a lot
lower, is not a really strong conscious decision at that age, I don't
believe.
It is a decision, yes, but not the kind of decision I think we're talking
about.
Decisions I made at 18 were no where near as informed or smart as I make
now.    
My point was, given that fact, that there are few athletes who are good
enough to have to make a conscious decision between hoops and football.
Most say "Well, I'm a football player" or "I'm a basketball player"....
Don't mind me, I'm having problems expressing myself today!  
'Saw
    
 | 
| 3.1489 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Mon Nov 02 1992 12:46 | 2 | 
|  |     
     What the hell are you talking about, Chainsaw ?
 | 
| 3.1490 |  | CAMONE::WAY | We're the Dance Band on the Titanic | Mon Nov 02 1992 12:49 | 14 | 
|  | >     What the hell are you talking about, Chainsaw ?
I don't know.  If I knew, do you think I'd be here?
Hell, no, if I really knew what I was talkinga bout, I'd be writing
for a magazine, or books or something, making tons of money, and
not having to worry about getting laid off by some guy who has problems
deciding if he wants to buy a red Porsche or a black Lotus, and who
wouldn't know a structure, union, or b-tree if it bit him in the
gluteus maximus......
8^)
 | 
| 3.1491 | Phillies | SALEM::HARRIS_K |  | Tue Nov 03 1992 12:11 | 7 | 
|  |     Has anyone heard any rumors on who the Phillies will protect?? I know
    they are not releasing the lists to the public, however local papers
    usually get a good idea at who the players are.
    
    Thanks in advance 
    
    Kenn
 | 
| 3.1492 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 13:47 | 10 | 
|  |     
    The bizarre saga of the SF Giants being sold gets wierder. A letter,
    purported to be from Horace Stonehams widow, was sent to owners
    indicating that Stoneham would not have wanted the Giants moved.
    Someone call her up and she said she had no knowledge of this letter.
    Turns out that her granddaughter, who is helping the folks who want to
    keep ther Giants in SF sent out the letter.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1493 | Serves him right! | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:37 | 13 | 
|  | >    purported to be from Horace Stonehams widow, was sent to owners
>    indicating that Stoneham would not have wanted the Giants moved.
    
    Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! I'm sure ol Horace is
    rolling over in his grave with the thought of uprooting tradition and 
    moving a well-established franchise to a new city!
    
    Did anyone see the "SI Classic" a few weeks ago that had an article on
    the NY Giants last home game in the Polo Grounds? The fans hung around
    the field, for several hours after the game, and eventually stormed
    Stoneham's office. 
    
    Tom         
 | 
| 3.1494 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:40 | 4 | 
|  |     That was a funny SI article. Too bad it was not written in 1957.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1495 | starting in Tampa | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:41 | 7 | 
|  | Meanwhile, Tampa is starting to sell advertisement, tickets and otherwise
setting up shop. The only real thing that the stay-in-SF crowd have
going for them is that the "normal" procedures may not have been followed
in making the offer to sale. But the sale itself was approved in detail
and at this point the Tampa offer is the only signed deal.
TTom
 | 
| 3.1496 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:43 | 9 | 
|  |     
    A couple of months ago while picking up a relative at Logan who was
    flying in from Florida, I noticed that the T-shirts of the disembarking
    passengers were pretty much divided equally into "Disney World",
    "Florida Marlins" and "Tampa Bay Giants."  Maybe those babies will be
    worth something some day.
    
    Dickstah
    
 | 
| 3.1497 | Scheduling nightmare | SALES::THILL |  | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:51 | 16 | 
|  |     So what does this mean for the League and scheduling? Seems like quite
    a mess, since this was the year they were going to switch divisions
    anyway. Would the TB Giants stay in the west or go east with (I
    suppose) Cinncinnati staying put?
    
    1992 East	      1993 East		1992 West      1993 West
    Montreal ------------>              Los Angeles  ----->
    New York ------------>              San Diego -------->
    Philadelphia -------->              Houston ---------->
    Pittsburgh ---------->              San Francisco ?---> 
    St Louis                 <--------? Cinncinati ?------>
    Chicago                  <--------- Atlanta        Chicago
                      Florida                          St. Louis
                      Tampa Bay?                       Colorado
    
    Tom
 | 
| 3.1498 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 15:25 | 8 | 
|  |     For 1993, Giants would stay in the NL West. Realignment might happen
    for 1994. Cubs should have fewer complaints since there will only be 2
    NL teams on the West Coast so they will probably end up with fewer
    games out in California then they did through 1992. But the Cubs have
    been so obstinate so far, logic may have nothing to do with it.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1499 | just so "no" to Florida! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Hail to Bill Long and TcM | Wed Nov 11 1992 12:19 | 8 | 
|  |     
    I'm suprised that there hasn't been any discussion here about the vote
    of the owners to prevent the Giants from moving.
    
    Looks like Florida's gonna wait s'more.....
    
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1500 | nice to hear! | E2BIG::francus | Mets in '93 | Wed Nov 11 1992 12:52 | 3 | 
|  | See tha Baseball notesfile for the SF-TB Giants discussion.
The Crazy Met
 | 
| 3.1502 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:13 | 8 | 
|  | Kev -
As you can imagine, I'm happy that Tampa-St. Bleat got dumped again, wif ripped
fishnet stockings and smeared mascara, reeking of cheap wine, as the Bleatster
gets ready to hit the street again, to lay down and bare its soul to the next
'john' coming down the street.  oh-fer-seven and still counting.
JD
 | 
| 3.1503 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:16 | 4 | 
|  |     I knew JD would come up with something...
    
    Actually he's going to have to drop this one too since the Giants are
    staying in SF and Tampa will get an expansion team in 1997.
 | 
| 3.1504 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:32 | 12 | 
|  | Mac -
No problems if Tampa gets an expansion team.   Maybe now they'll stop trying
to steal teams.
If you want, Maccy, I'll send my notes to you for prior approval.   I guess
if I put in numerous Bernie Kosar notes it would okay.
Oh, and Maccy, you can always next unseen.  YIP!
JD
 | 
| 3.1505 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:35 | 3 | 
|  | �Oh, and Maccy, you can always next unseen.  
    
    Unfortunately that is not an option for a moderator.
 | 
| 3.1506 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:42 | 1 | 
|  | You can always stop being a moderator.
 | 
| 3.1507 |  | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:52 | 9 | 
|  | >   �Oh, and Maccy, you can always next unseen.  
    
>    Unfortunately that is not an option for a moderator.
    
    Really? In the diatribe, er, uh, I mean very informative message 'saw
    sent me about being a mod and not abusing my power, I didn't see that. 
    Not sure I want to see it either.  8^)
    
    Brews 
 | 
| 3.1508 | NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:03 | 9 | 
|  |     I'd never want to be a FM for this conference...  I couldn't
    stand reading all the meaningless BS all you other guys put
    into this place.
    
    
    I Remain,
    carefully pondering every note I enter  (sorry Kev)
    
    BG
 | 
| 3.1509 | 1997 expansion? Who says? | SALES::THILL |  | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:58 | 11 | 
|  |     So is this 1997 expansion just another way for MLB to get "St. Bleat" off 
    their backs? I haven't heard a word about yet another expansion on the
    horizon. Jeez, people complain enough that there isn't enough quality
    pitching around, I cain only imageine what the cries will be then. 
    
    Since St Bleat will be guaranteed a franchise, is it safe to say it
    will be in the AL, so the southeast wont be totally NL country? What
    other cities are in the running. Oh boy! I cain't wait for yet another
    awful team called the Washington Senators...
    
    Tom  
 | 
| 3.1511 |  | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Nov 12 1992 12:32 | 7 | 
|  |     
    Tommy,
    
    you don;t want to hear the other side; it's the same as this one.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
 | 
| 3.1512 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Nov 12 1992 14:09 | 13 | 
|  | Tommy
So sorry.  I apologize.   Mea Culpa.   Ever think of becoming a moderator.
I wish Tampa got the franchise.   I hope it goes to court.  I hope baseball
loses it anti-trust exemption.  I hope San Francisco falls into the ocean for
allowing a godless lifestyle to flourish.   I hope all baseball teams leave
the north to play in domed, astroturf southern cities.   I hope this makes
everyone happy.  They seem so upset all the time.
Love and kisses.
JD
 | 
| 3.1513 | R U lonely toniiight?????? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Hail to Bill Long and TcM | Thu Nov 12 1992 16:52 | 12 | 
|  |     
    JD,
    
    So how long has your wife been away?
    
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    knowledgable about hormones
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1514 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Fri Nov 13 1992 09:02 | 9 | 
|  | Kevin,
Great note.  I noted some humour in it.   Always looking for a good old-fashioned
chuckle.
I appreciate a good note.
I remain, indebted to you
JD
 | 
| 3.1515 | Get much sleep? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Fri Nov 13 1992 09:40 | 10 | 
|  |     JD,
    
    Obviously she returned last night eh?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    holding back a big barf!
    Kev
    
 | 
| 3.1516 | JD's the anti-T! | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Fri Nov 13 1992 10:21 | 4 | 
|  |     
    	Somebody slap JD upside his haid!  Snap out of it man!
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.1517 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Wed Dec 02 1992 08:38 | 3 | 
|  |     
      Baseball's executive committee has appointed a four member panel
     to investigate the allegations against Cincinnati owner Marge Schott.
 | 
| 3.1518 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Wed Dec 02 1992 10:41 | 6 | 
|  |     re-.1
    Why don't they just appoint a firing squad and shoot the insolent
    b_tch???
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1519 |  | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Dec 02 1992 10:51 | 5 | 
|  |      
    "investigate allegations"?!  It's already been proven in court, and she
    admitted to it.  What more could they want?
    
    
 | 
| 3.1520 |  | FRETZ::HEISER | Jesus was a blonde too! | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:06 | 1 | 
|  |     Is Marge Schott really Johnny Most's twin sister?
 | 
| 3.1521 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:23 | 7 | 
|  | �    "investigate allegations"?!  It's already been proven in court, and she
�    admitted to it.  What more could they want?
    
    What court?  According to a posting in BASEBALL she's denying it.  She
    said the arm band is a war souvenier that's kept in a dresser drawer in
    her bedroom and the reports of her comments were made by a fired
    employee.
 | 
| 3.1522 | Perjury? | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:30 | 5 | 
|  |        IF you read the stories today Mac, she's admitted to some of the
    slurs under oath (in depositions). And the Hitler comment was to a NY
    Times reporter. She's denying some of the statements she's made under
    oath.
                                     Denny
 | 
| 3.1523 | Fireless firing squad | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I survived Chuck E. Cheese | Wed Dec 02 1992 13:07 | 14 | 
|  | �    Why don't they just appoint a firing squad and shoot the insolent
�    b_tch???
 
Because the best they could do is stand in front of her, point their 
index fingers at her, and yell "BANG".  The owners committee is powerless to 
do anything to her, since baseball trashed the commissioner.  They have no 
jurisdiction under the bylaws of baseball, nor in the courts.
Maybe my knee is jerking like everyone else's, but I think Schott should 
be thrown out on her ear.  I heard she testified that she didn't know that 
the n-word was a derogatory term - puhlease, this is the 90s, nobody is 
that sheltered.
=Bob=
 | 
| 3.1524 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Wed Dec 02 1992 13:23 | 12 | 
|  |        I was listening to Dale Arnold on WEEI while I was on the road
    yesterday. Some guy called in with this little tidbit about Margebo.
    She was attending an owners meeting in Chicago a few years ago. Seems
    she got there an hour early and was hanging around the conference room. 
    After a while she was overheard in a conversation with the Red's
    office: "why didn't anyone tell me there was an hour difference between
    Cinci. and Chicago!?"
      
    re:.1523
       There might not be a commish, but you'd think the NL pres' would do
    or say SOMETHING!!
                                Denny
 | 
| 3.1525 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:00 | 4 | 
|  |     	ESPN reported last night that the call in radio polls are running
    in favor of Schott 3-1.  
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1526 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:18 | 13 | 
|  |     While I think what Marge said was stupid and ignorant, I also find it
    quite similar to offending other minority groups with team nicknames.
    Just because the Native Amnerican groups aren't as large (and dont play
    in baseball games or attend in any large numbers), it seems as though
    baseball is saying it's ok to use a name that offends a small minority
    group, just don't piss off a large one.  Baseball even uses the same
    excuse as Schott did, in that she said "I didn't me it in an offensive
    way." If baseball (and other professional sports) wants to clean this
    stuff up, they need to do it for all minorities, not just the large
    ones. 
    
    Dennis Faust
    
 | 
| 3.1527 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:46 | 1 | 
|  | Well said Dennis.  
 | 
| 3.1528 |  | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Dec 02 1992 18:05 | 6 | 
|  |     
    WHich baseball nickname is derogatory?  I've heard as many pro-Braves
    votes as anti's.  I heard some boob say that since Schott's team's 
    name is the Reds, we shouldn't be surprised.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1529 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Wed Dec 02 1992 19:47 | 13 | 
|  |     re: .1528
    
    I believe I remember seeing pickets on TV outside a site where the
    Atlanta team was playing. If *any* Native American groups find the
    nickname offensive, they should change it. I feel that since somegroups
    find the name offensive, it's just as bad as if they had a nickname
    like the words that Marge used.
    
    Sure Marge is a racist pig, but so is MLB and the NFL. What's new about
    that?
    
    Dennis Faust
      
 | 
| 3.1530 |  | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Marge Schott: Designated Hitler | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:17 | 2 | 
|  |     
    
 | 
| 3.1531 |  | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:29 | 7 | 
|  |     
    I think we've been through this before, but, I disagree.  The groups
    from the reservations here in AZ said they had no problem with the name
    Braves.  They went on to say that a large portion of Indians either
    didn't care or thought the name Braves was positive and that most of
    the people in the anti protests were white rent-a-mob members who show
    up at these type of events.
 | 
| 3.1532 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:56 | 23 | 
|  | Bruce -
While that may be so, to some extent - the real outcry (headed by American
Indians, and not rent-a-mobbers) is that it perpetuates stereotyping of
the American Indian.  Hey, not *all* Irish mind the stereotype of the
drunken leprechan, or maybe not *all* afro-americans mind the various
stereotypes - but that doesn't make them right, nor does it make it a case
for easy dismissal.
It seems that for every Indian group offended, someone can trot out another
group that says nothing is wrong.  It wouldn't be a tough thing for the
teams to change their names anyway.  After all, how many people think of
American Indians and relate them to Washington DC, Cleveland, Kansas City
or Atlanta, for instance?    Various colleges have changed their names, and
using a PAC10 example, Stanford hasn't seemed to suffer any loss of dignity
or anything since changing.
And repeatedly, the groups have said they find the name "Redskins" to be the
most offensive, and have taken offense wiht the painting of faces, the tomahawk
chop (now, would ANYONE be heart-broken if that went away), the feathered 
headdress, etc....
JD
 | 
| 3.1533 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:16 | 3 | 
|  |     The hue and cry I've heard in regard to American Indians and
    professional sports have revolved around Braves fans use of the
    tomahawk chop and the Washington NFL team's use of the name Redskin.
 | 
| 3.1534 | Hep Me! | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:33 | 8 | 
|  |     
    JD,
    
    	What was Stanford prior to *Cardinal*?
    
    	Why isn't it plural?
    
    Claybroon
 | 
| 3.1535 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:34 | 3 | 
|  | �    	Why isn't it plural?
    
    Maybe it Cardinal refers to the color and not the bird.
 | 
| 3.1536 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:42 | 7 | 
|  | Mac 0
They have protested at KC Chiefs games also.  Since I work and sometimes run
with a guy onthe American Indian Council, I do get some first hand information.
Stanford Cardinal is the color, I believe.
JD
 | 
| 3.1537 | Bill Cardinal Walsh? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Gandhi Cactus Juice | Thu Dec 03 1992 12:45 | 4 | 
|  | They picked Cardinal cause the mathematicians threatened a protest if
they used Ordinal.
TTom
 | 
| 3.1538 | Bigotry like Schott's is the big problem, not the mascots | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Dec 03 1992 13:01 | 16 | 
|  |     
    I think the biggest difference between the American Indian
    controversies and the Marge Schott situation is the intent.  It's the
    intent-- what's behind the symbology-- that really matters in race
    relations, no?  Yes, most of us need to become educated on American
    Indian history and culture, and some of these sports stereotypes get in
    the way of that, and should be done away with.  However, I don't see 
    them as a conscious, racist assault on American Indians, which is
    what you're dealing with in an ingrained bigot like Schott, whose
    motives are hateful, period.  The Indian mascots represent 
    misunderstanding and insensitivity, the likes of Schott represent 
    institutionalized racism.  Big difference, in my opinion, that's
    reflected in the response of the targets in both cases...
    
    glenn
      
 | 
| 3.1539 | To answer your question | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Thu Dec 03 1992 13:22 | 2 | 
|  |       They used to be the Stanford Indians.
                                 Denny
 | 
| 3.1540 |  | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Thu Dec 03 1992 15:38 | 7 | 
|  |     re: .1538
    
    But Marge already said that she had no racist intent, either. But then,
    that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
 | 
| 3.1541 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Dec 03 1992 15:55 | 26 | 
|  | >    that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well, I'd like to suggest some new names for these teams.
How 'bout the
	Washington TrouserWeasels
and the
	Atlanta Ferns.
That should keep everyone happy, I think....
8^)
'Saw
    
 | 
| 3.1542 | We're trivializing the repulsiveness of Schott's actions | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN |  | Thu Dec 03 1992 17:25 | 19 | 
|  | 
    > But Marge already said that she had no racist intent, either. But then,
    > that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
    
    I guess it's up to one's own judgment, then.  Do you believe Marge
    Schott?  With witnesses coming out of the woodwork everyday to testify 
    otherwise, did poor old Marge really harbor no ill will at all?  
    
    And on the other hand, if Atlanta and Washington and all their fans are 
    "racists", then by some remote standard or another we all are, I suppose, 
    and there's no point in making any distinctions, and by extension, in
    taking any particular action to make any progress.  I don't go along with 
    that kind of relativism.  I think the examples are worlds apart, and
    baseball's race problem is still primarily where it's always been, with 
    the poor hiring record of blacks in the front offices, not with the
    Cleveland and Atlanta mascots.
    
    glenn
     
 | 
| 3.1543 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Dec 03 1992 17:57 | 44 | 
|  | >    And on the other hand, if Atlanta and Washington and all their fans are 
>    "racists", then by some remote standard or another we all are, I suppose, 
>    and there's no point in making any distinctions, and by extension, in
We ALL *are* racist to some degree.  I firmly believe that.
Human beings have a fear (neurosis???) about things that are different.
We all are distrustful (to some degree) of people who are different.
It need not be based on race either.  Look at the problems right now with
the Neo-Nazis in Germany.  It's not just race they have a problem with,
it's all foreigners.   They are afraid (among other things) of what they
perceive to be the weakening of their culture through mixing with others.
(I'm not saying that philosophy is right, but that's what I perceive part
of their philosophy is).
Nowadays, with political correctness, and second guessing, you almost
begin to wonder about things.   For example, I'm very proud of my
heritage, of my Scottish ancestry and stuff like that.  However, because
I'm white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, I have to wonder if some folks would
perceive my pride as racism.
I don't know what it's like to be black, but I'm sure that some folks
who are not black might perceive the natural pride of black people in
their heritage to be racist also.
It is such a fine line that we tread.......  Personally, I would hope,
in my heart, that we all have room inside of us to appreciate other
cultures and races, but to also not be afriad to be proud of our own....
Now, as far as Marge goes, if she DID say the things she did, then I
like what one player agent suggested -- sentence her to 6 months of
working with Dave Parker to work for the underprivileged youth of
Cincinnati, and then 6 months on a Kibbutz(sp??) in Israel.....
Sorry about getting on my soapbox,
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1544 | I like races, 'specially the mile!  ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Fri Dec 04 1992 08:39 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 3.1545 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Fri Dec 04 1992 08:52 | 28 | 
|  | Glenn -
I agree with much you bring forth.
However, the attitude shown by many concerning mascots, the tomahawk chop,
etc., are really parts, or attitudes, of the overall problem.  The fact taht
folks don't understand why these would be offensive shows the how deep 
our racial ignorance can go.  
I think many folks now use "PC" as a scapegoat, analagous how groups use
the media as a scapegoat or a reason for the problems.  
Stereotypes abound - the happy drunken irishman, the mafia gangster Italian,
the stupid Polack, the Uncle Tom, the proud drunken suicidal savage, 
the dumb as nails rural dweller, etc...
Many folks take these stereotypes as the truth, and form their opinions
of groups by them.  Then they don't understand when those groups protest
or have a problem with those stereotypes.
Perhaps folks like Marge Shott, or Al Campanis, are thrown into the 
crucible of controversy is because they say things that many others feel,
and are ashamed or embarrassed to hear these secret feelings put into the
public eye.
JMHO.
JD
 | 
| 3.1546 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Fri Dec 04 1992 08:58 | 16 | 
|  | 
   >> Now, as far as Marge goes, if she DID say the things she did, 
   >> then I like what one player agent suggested -- sentence her to 
   >> 6 months of working with Dave Parker to work for the underpriv-
   >> ileged youth of Cincinnati, and then 6 months on a Kibbutz(sp??) 
   >> in Israel.....
       It'd probably be a waste of time. You can't undo sixty-some-odd
      years of ingrained ignorance in one year (if ever). I just hope
      that some good comes of this. As pathetic as the Campanis incident
      was, it pointed up a mindset amongst some of the powers that be in
      baseball and served as a catalyst for some small measure of change.
      Blacks and Jews and other minorities can go on all day and night
      about the pervasiveness of racism and anti-semitism  but nothing 
      brings the point home like a bigot with a loud mouth. 
    
 | 
| 3.1547 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:10 | 7 | 
|  |     	Everybody will say how terrible Marge Schott is and try to get
    her out of baseball, and some folks will think that by getting her
    out things will be better, but my opinion is that after the furor
    dies down baseball, and other sports will continue their practice
    of rarely hiring minorities in front office positions.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1548 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:11 | 21 | 
|  | 
  >> Perhaps folks like Marge Shott, or Al Campanis, are thrown into 
  >> the crucible of controversy is because they say things that many 
  >> others feel, and are ashamed or embarrassed to hear these secret 
  >> feelings put into the public eye.
     Folks like Marge Schott and Al Campanis are thrown into the `cruci-
     ble of controversy' because they wield at least some small measure
     of power. Their prejudices directly affect people's livelihoods.
     When Al says that maybe blacks are somehow genetically incapable of
     being managers, it is very different from some truck driver saying the
     same thing. Al had the power to influence who could and could not
     manage a baseball team. A truck driver doesn't wield that power.
     When Marge Schott is exposed as a bigot and then it is revealed that
     only one out of the forty-five folks in the Reds' front office is a 
     minority, it doesn't take a giant leap of logic to figure that there
     may be discriminatory hiring practices going on. If the number of
     minorities in the Reds' front office was more reflective of society
     as a whole or baseball in particular then the case against her, IMO,
     would be much weaker and maybe even moot.
    
 | 
| 3.1549 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:23 | 10 | 
|  | Tommy -
I agree with with what you said.  As always, its hard to read 'tone' into
notes, but my assumption on your tone is that you misunderstood where I'm
coming from.  I don't condone Schott or Campanis.  I don't think they are
being picked on or anything.  Just said that their statements may cause such
uproar for more than one reason - one being the obvious, which you stated -
ignorance, etc., the other being guilt.
JD
 | 
| 3.1550 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Fri Dec 04 1992 10:11 | 7 | 
|  | 
    JD, as far as I can tell you believe that a number of people 
   who are voicing concern over the Schott issue are doing so be-
   cause they feel guilty about having the same feelings themselves.
   If that's your point then I didn't misunderstand what you said, I 
   just don't agree.
    
 | 
| 3.1551 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Fri Dec 04 1992 10:26 | 14 | 
|  | Tommy -
I do believe some guilt is involved, yes.  I can't buy that all these folks
are 'shocked', since the attitude displayed by Marge ins't exactly 'unique'.
People are outraged, yes.  But how many of these outraged folks will simply
slip back into status quo land once the fuhrer (okay, bad pun) is over?  
Dumping Marge won't mean anything if the root problems aren't addressed.  For
every Al Campanis and Marge schott that comes out into the open by saying
something stupid in public, how many are there that have the same type
feelings, but put on a facade?
JD
 | 
| 3.1552 |  | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Fri Dec 04 1992 10:57 | 12 | 
|  |     
    Don't wanna make any inflammatory statements but aren't there 13 major
    league BBall teams who have NEVER had a minority in either the front
    office or as a manager?
    
    btw - Marge's team isn't among them!
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for_Mac ~/~
    
    ;^)
    
 | 
| 3.1553 |  | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCG Product Management | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:11 | 4 | 
|  |     Can someone please explain to my WHY Marge should be stripped of her
    right to make a living even if she made everyone one of the comments?
    
    Mark.
 | 
| 3.1554 |  | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:27 | 6 | 
|  |     
    What do you mean right to make a living?  She still has the ability to
    marry someone with money like she did before.  She may have limited her
    options with what she said, though.
    
    Brews
 | 
| 3.1555 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:34 | 11 | 
|  |     
   >> Can someone please explain to my WHY Marge should be stripped of her
   >> right to make a living even if she made everyone one of the comments?
    
      If'n Large Marge is forced to sell her share of the Reds, chance are
      she won't end up shabbily dressed, pushing a shopping cart filled with 
      her belongings around Cincinnati, drooling all over herself and mumbling
      loudly about how she used to be somebody. She'll still be a very wealthy
      lady. The question is, though, what is a fitting punishment ? Or is what
      she's done even punishable ? I do know that if she worked for DEC or any
      other private company her butt would already have been fired.
 | 
| 3.1556 |  | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:37 | 5 | 
|  | >      If'n Large Marge is forced to sell her share of the Reds, chance are
    
      That's Mark's point Tommy. HOW can she be 'forced' to sell? Although
    I hope that somehow she can be, I don't think our laws allow it.
                                   Denny
 | 
| 3.1557 |  | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:47 | 11 | 
|  |     
  >> That's Mark's point Tommy. HOW can she be 'forced' to sell? Although
  >> I hope that somehow she can be, I don't think our laws allow it.
    
     Denny, in my reply I asked if what she's done is even punishable.
     Under constitutional law I'd say no but baseball doesn't operate
     under strict constitutional law. I think what's taking so long is 
     that the owners are trying to find a way to force her out that will
     stand up to a legal challenge.
     
    
 | 
| 3.1558 |  | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:50 | 5 | 
|  |     	She can't be forced to sell the team, just forced not to manage
    it.  George Steinbluster was still making money as owner of the
    YankMees, he just couldn't have any say as to how the team was run.
    
    				/Don
 | 
| 3.1559 | Some people should keep the BIG MOUTH SHUT | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS |  | Fri Dec 04 1992 13:50 | 15 | 
|  |     You can not have say, but believe me still have say.  I dont what
    percentage of the team she owns but if she cant help manage the team
    she still may have say in what GM stay or go and so on ???????
    
    Someone told me she was german and Really is Very Prejudice against
    ALL Minorities (Not picky).  Just curious to what laws there are
    against her (or rules in baseball).  Also can Hitlers Teachings in
    anyway fall under Religion ?????  Sometimes they seem like Cults ??
    
    						I hate to be on that team
    						If I was (jewish or Black)
    
    Also I wonder if any of the minorities could now breech there contracts
    and refuse to play for that team as long as she is the owner,  more or
    less becoming free agents ?????
 | 
| 3.1560 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Fri Dec 04 1992 15:11 | 10 | 
|  |     
    >>  she won't end up shabbily dressed, pushing a shopping cart filled with 
    >>  her belongings around Cincinnati, drooling all over herself and mumbling
    >>  loudly about how she used to be somebody.
    
    Isn't that what she does now after one of her all night drinking binges
    that allegedly happen????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1561 |  | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Dec 04 1992 18:52 | 23 | 
|  | Hitler's "credo" falls under politics.
He had some pretty bizarre ideas pulled from a mish-mash of
different ideologies.  His greatest talent was as an orator,
as he could "spellbind" people with his speeches.
Because the German people were so demoralized after WWI
he was able to touch their national pride (after all it
was called the National Socialist party), and rouse the
people to his ideas.....
If yo'reUId you are interested, William Shirer's "The Rise
and Fall of the Third Reich" makes for pretty interesting
reading.  I haven't finished it, but even the early parts
prior to 1939 are pretty scary, considering you know what is
going to happen.....
A sad story.....
'Saw
 | 
| 3.1562 | Giants Buy Bonds | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:53 | 4 | 
|  |     According to the Worcester T&G, the winner of the Barry Bonds
    sweepstakes appears to be the SF Giants.  Even though the sale of the
    Giants won't be formally approved until the winter meetings, the new
    owners are already in action.
 | 
| 3.1563 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Wed Dec 09 1992 19:11 | 12 | 
|  |     Marge Schott barfed a token apology today.
    
    I gots a ????
    
    They are saying tha Schott may be suspended.  How does a suspension
    affect a team owner???  Does she still get the $$$ from the team whilst
    suspended????Is she just forbidden to run the team business while
    suspended????Does she get daily beatings administered by the league's
    discipline comittee????
    
    JaKe
    
 | 
| 3.1564 |  | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 10 1992 09:27 | 2 | 
|  |     Big free agent signings in the NL.  Maddux went to the Braves. 
    Dodgers signed Worrel.
 | 
| 3.1565 |  | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 10 1992 11:12 | 3 | 
|  |       28 mil for 5 years on maddux?
    
      i'm envious
 | 
| 3.1566 |  | CSOA1::BACH | They pelted us with rocks and garbage | Thu Dec 10 1992 11:16 | 3 | 
|  |     The bum.
    
    Chip_RonSanto_Bach
 | 
| 3.1567 |  | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Thu Dec 10 1992 12:27 | 4 | 
|  |     Yankees offered $34...
    
    Not a bad rotation... Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery...
    
 | 
| 3.1568 |  | PFSVAX::JACOB | PC is not fer ME | Fri Dec 11 1992 00:18 | 18 | 
|  |     Seems Mr October_NOT has changed his mind and will wear his Dad's(and
    mentor in becoming such a mental midget) number 25, instead of Willie
    Mays' #24.  Say snippets of the news conference where he met the SF
    media and announced his change of heart, and he came across as a
    sentimental idiot.  Just the way he described being in left field and
    seeing Mays' #24 on the wall, and imagining he was a kid again(mentally
    he's still 4 yrs old) and being in the outfield with his godfather made
    me run fer the bathroom so's I could puke my guts out.
    
    Wonder how he likes DURACELL 6 volt batteries??  Guess we'll find out
    when he comes to Pgh. nexted year.  Now, where is my 1993 schedule?
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
 | 
| 3.1569 |  | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Dec 15 1992 09:37 | 14 | 
|  | San Francisco officials approved a five-year lease concessions agreement with
the Giants in which the city will pay the $3.1 million annual cost to
operate Candlestick Park.  The board of supervisors voted 10-1 in favor of the
agreement, which will charge the Giants $1.00 a year for rent.  Supporters of
the deal said the city will be absorbing money that would have been lost if
the Giants moved to St. Petersburg, FLorida.
AN organizer in Cheyenne, Wyoming says minor league play may come to Wyoming,
cColorado and Nebraska.  A relocation of the Arizona League for Rookies did
not work out due to budget considerations.  No formal plans on the table yet to
form a new league.
JD
 | 
| 3.1570 |  | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Tue Dec 15 1992 12:06 | 6 | 
|  |     
    	There's already *minor league* ball in Colorado (Colo. Sprgs.).
    	I'm fairly certain Omaha (Nebraska) has a minor league team
    	already.....
    
    Claybroon
 |