T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4225.1 | You say recycling. I say recall | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Mon Oct 30 1995 08:50 | 9 |
| You say tomato...
Could it have been the thousands of plastic terminal and other cases that
turned yellow?
mikeP
ps I know of others but this seems to fit both categories as the cases
should have been recycled as they were returned.
|
4225.2 | Try EH&S | LESREG::CAMBER | | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:02 | 6 |
|
Try contacting the people who deal with recycling of materials in
the company, within the EH&S group. (VTX EHS)
--Sue
|
4225.3 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Oct 30 1995 12:05 | 3 |
| TRAX?
Atlant
|
4225.4 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Oct 30 1995 12:17 | 3 |
| I -vaguely- recall that it had something to do with one of our early
forays into what we today call Enterprise Servers. It was a big system,
intended to compete in the big IBM-mainframe world.
|
4225.5 | VT 50 ?? | SUBSYS::JAMES | | Mon Oct 30 1995 13:24 | 15 |
| Back in 1973, DEC recalled the VT50 for reliability. The circuit boards
were made of paperboard. Normal wear and tear caused lifted etch
open solder joints. DEC recalled all units and swapped them for VT52s.
At the time this happened, recycling hadn't been invented.
Since then we've gotten much better at recycling. The VT500 family was the
first DIGITAL product that was designed to meet every environmental and
recycling requirement, world-wide. DIGITAL got a lot of good press for it.
TRAX was a block mode transaction processing envionment (it may have been
classed as an operating system). It was announced and retracted from the
market. It couldn't be made to work. As software, it wasn't hard to recycle.
The VT62, which was designed to support TRAX was killed almost the day it first
shipped. There wasn't much to recall.
|
4225.6 | | MKOTS3::MITCHELL | | Mon Oct 30 1995 15:52 | 4 |
| THERE WAS ALSO A FLUID COOLED SYSTEM THAT DIGITAL SCRAPPED AS A VIABLE
PRODUCT. ONE REASON WAS THE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF THE COOLING FLUID
BECAUSE IT WAS CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS MATERIAL.
|
4225.7 | Another possible recall | MROA::LLAMBERT | | Mon Oct 30 1995 16:08 | 9 |
| If my memory serves me correctly, we also had a recall due to Silver
plated leads on ICs. We had silver migration between component leads
creating shorts, which in turn led to system failures. Those systems
were recalled and reworked. This happened in the late 70's. The NRO
labs did lots of work on this problem and perhaps the information is
Archived in some corporate library. I would suggest a search on
Metal migration, silver migration, silver leads, etc.
Good luck.
|
4225.8 | Digital's Environmental Health & Safety group | TNPUBS::PHALEN | | Mon Oct 30 1995 16:19 | 7 |
| Hi Gene,
Digital's Envirnomental Health and Safety group in MSO may be able to
help you. The program manager is Larry Nielsen (POWDML::NIELSEN).
Regards,
Alice
|
4225.9 | | SCAS01::SODERSTROM | Bring on the Competition | Mon Oct 30 1995 16:21 | 2 |
| Is it Larry or Leslie? ;)
|
4225.10 | Back when terminals had *REAL* buzzers and a key-click was a click! | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Mon Oct 30 1995 20:53 | 14 |
| > Back in 1973, DEC recalled the VT50 for reliability. The circuit boards
> were made of paperboard. Normal wear and tear caused lifted etch
> open solder joints. DEC recalled all units and swapped them for VT52s.
Not in 1973, they didn't! The VT50 hit the streets around 1976,
'bout the same time I did! And the paperboard circuit boards
remained in the VT52 successors forever, although I think some
later production (and certainly the add-on VT55 graphics
module and VT78 PDP-8 module) were built of G10 or FR4 fiber-
glass composite.
But you're certainly right about the boards being junk.
Atlant
|
4225.11 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Tue Oct 31 1995 04:01 | 7 |
| I'd plump for VAX 9000.
In the UK most (all?) were replaced with an "attractive" deal for the
cutomers. It was an impressive engineering feat, the VAX 9000 not the
deal!
Andrew
|
4225.12 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Tue Oct 31 1995 10:16 | 23 |
|
Say what you will about the VAX 9000, but all in all, it was
a good machine and very nicely engineered. It was just 5 years
too late.
FWIW, as of last year, I know for a fact that VAX 9000's were
being reconditioned and resold. A number of them were going to
U.S. Government sources, never to been heard from again.
(NoSuchAgency??) Whereever they were going, the people that
got them love them.
I had one in my cluster many years ago. VAX 9000-440 with *4*
vector processors and 512MB of memory. It took awhile to get
going, but once it did, it ran forever. I even had a proto
of one with 2GB of memory for a while. Until that project
got scrapped because the upgrade to 2GB cost more than
a 3GB VAX 7000. Still, there were customers out there ready
to pay.
You'll never see a bemoth like that again. At least from DEC.
mike
|
4225.13 | Just truned off 2 VAX 9000 in our FM Centre | CHEFS::WILKINSON_M | | Tue Oct 31 1995 12:20 | 12 |
|
Just switched off a customer VAX 9000 Model 420 (x2) Cluster 2 weeks
ago - replaced by VAX 7000's.
The air conditioning system is now only running at 20% capacity instead
of 85%.
Also we are consuming much less electricity ($$$$$$ worth less)..
mark W.
|
4225.14 | | IROCZ::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Tue Oct 31 1995 17:54 | 6 |
| > The air conditioning system is now only running at 20% capacity instead
> of 85%.
I'm not surprised. The 9000 ran mostly on ECL chips which use huge amounts
of power. That is why the prototype was fluid cooled. It was thought that air
cooling could not dissipate the heat fast enough.
|
4225.15 | They were already in the field when I got there in Feb '76 | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:52 | 8 |
|
The VT50 hit the streets in late '74/early '75. I took over the Westfield
Line Printer refurb area when Ken Boardway transferred to the new VT50 line
in '74. and. the biggest drawback to the VT50 wasn't the circuit boards,
it was the on-board hard copy output. anyone remember THAT fiasco?
or how about the packaging fiasco? K.O. went berserk when the skids and
boxes were too big to fit through the door for simple office peripherals.
|
4225.16 | | ICS::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:56 | 3 |
| ahh, yes... and to think we call those the good old days!
t.
|
4225.17 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:39 | 1 |
| Wasn't the printer version the VT55? Did one of them ever work?
|
4225.18 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | Im gonna boogie till I go Blind | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:53 | 2 |
|
I seem to remember it having a -H variant on on several VT's of the day.
|
4225.19 | | WRKSYS::BCLARK | Bob E. Clark PK3-2/T18 DTN 223-5733 | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:08 | 4 |
| Gees, this reminds when we filled up the cafeteria and hallways with
LA36's (so we wouldn't have to recall 8^). Anyone remember that?
bc
|
4225.20 | What graphics...? | ALFA2::ALFA2::HARRIS | | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:46 | 1 |
| VT55 was the graphics version (sort of), largely marketed by LDP.
|
4225.21 | | HELIX::SKALTSIS | Deb | Wed Nov 01 1995 13:48 | 3 |
| The "H" stood for Hand, and was the keypad component.
Deb
|
4225.22 | VT55=No Fun to Fix | STOSS1::OBLACK | Marty OBlack | Sat Nov 04 1995 19:57 | 4 |
| I was sometimes asked to repair VT55's with thermal printers at
a large customer site in 1980-81. The customer used to tease me
about the fact that most of the time I could repair his tri-SMP
DECsystem-10's faster than the VT55's. (Sad but true!)
|
4225.23 | VT55 was tough to build too | SUBSYS::JAMES | | Mon Nov 06 1995 11:32 | 2 |
| The thermal printer controller board was a pain to build too. I still remember
the number 54-01164. Back then, it still required magic to build product.
|