T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1874.1 | Get in line! | LUDWIG::LOGSDON | | Wed Apr 29 1992 18:21 | 5 |
| Rumor has it that there is standing room only in the ALPHA booth. They
have a ALPHA based machine running against an HP and SUN system with
the ALPHA machine , of course, beating the pants off the other systems.
Also heard the HP system went down today. Benchmarking is better than
benchsitting.
|
1874.2 | | CREATV::QUODLING | Ken, Me, and a cast of extras... | Thu Apr 30 1992 00:05 | 6 |
| A Marketing type told me that in one booth we had 3 G(iga-)IPS or
B(illion-)IPS of Computes in one area alone. I also heard a figure
describing Terabytes of Memory in total on the systems there...
q
|
1874.3 | | POBOX::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Thu Apr 30 1992 02:04 | 5 |
| That's nice.
Have we sold anything yet?
"jackin' the house", Bob
|
1874.4 | Yes, the Alpha Showcase has been packed! | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | I am NOT a bottlecap! | Thu Apr 30 1992 08:22 | 7 |
| re .1
This message is being sent to you from the Alpha Showcase at DECworld
'92 from the Alpha Mixed Architecture VMScluster.
It has been wall-to-wall people here from the time the doors open until
after the time they close
|
1874.5 | | CGVAX2::CONNELL | It's my party and I'll scry if I want to. | Thu Apr 30 1992 10:50 | 2 |
| I heard that the America's Cup software competition was popular. :-)
Pjil
|
1874.6 | | VERGA::FACHON | | Thu Apr 30 1992 11:51 | 7 |
| re -.2
Congrats to whoever brought in the competition's machines!
Nice rebuttle to the HP slight of hand.
Thanks for your efforts on *all* our behalfs,
Dean F.
|
1874.7 | But it's really great sh** Mrs. Preske! | DENVER::DAVISGB | I'd rather be driving my Jag | Thu Apr 30 1992 14:23 | 3 |
| And a mixed VAX/ALPHA cluster.....ZOWEEE!
|
1874.8 | But of course... It's VMS! | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | I am NOT a bottlecap! | Thu Apr 30 1992 16:21 | 3 |
| re .-1
But of course... It's VMS!
|
1874.9 | Anonymous reply - hotel gripes | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Thu Apr 30 1992 17:28 | 69 |
| The following reply has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by
mail, please send your message to QUARK::MODERATOR, specifying the
conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Steve
Some DECworld observations: it seems to be well-attended by the
right level of people. Some, of course, appear to be merely "tire-
kickers", and many are simply "glazed" at the "extravagance" of
the whole event, which appears that it may get in the way of them
fully seeing/examining what they came for. Many expressed surprise
that Digital was active in so many diverse areas.
Monday's attendees were a surprise for me; the ratio of Digital
employees to non-Digital seemed to be about 10 to 1. I suppose
this could be explained by "sales reps scoping out the place before
their customers arrive later in the week", but for some reason, it
surprised me. If this is truly the reason, perhaps the "Employee
Day" could be on the *Monday* instead of the preceding Friday,
since many sales folks fly in for the event, and are either unable
or unwilling to spend the weekend in Boston, waiting for the official
Monday opening day. If "scoping out the place" is truly an activity
that needs to take place, then we should accomodate it and plan
for it.
One major irritation (mentioned by customers and employees alike)
is that Digital is getting shafted big time by Rogal America, who
is doing the hotel booking stuff for Digital. Customers and
attendees who book thru Rogal (which is supposedly *required* if
we expect our expense vouchers to be signed) are paying full list
price for hotel rooms.
When I checked into my hotel (a nice one), the rate was $199/night.
I've stayed in this hotel before recently, and am fully aware that
if the reservations are booked and paid for 2 weeks in advance, the
rate then becomes $149/night. Other people have taken the "daring"
approach, ignoring the dictate to book thru Rogal and doing it them-
selves, and receiving rates that are less than *HALF* of what the
rate would have been thru Rogal.
One of the kickers was when I was at the hotel registration desk,
another person (non-DECworld-related) was also checking in. This
person was paying $149/night (at the same hotel where I was being
charged $199) because made & paid for it 2 weeks in advance. I
was trying to modify my reservation, make some minor changes to the
dates I was staying. The hotel "couldn't" do it. Huh?? You're the
hotel, right? Yes, it was made clear to us at the hotel that any
and all changes need to be done via Rogal *BECAUSE THEY RECEIVE A
COMMISSION ON IT*!!
Sorry, I thought we were a computer company that could do some-
thing like ourselves, especially in these economic times when the
financial savings of doing it ourselves would provide significant
savings. Indeed, the ROI, even after paying "internal cross charges"
to have the software written by some group, would pay for itself in
about 2 days.
Anyway, not to burst the whole DECworld balloon via this one
particularly negative aspect, I can say that all-in-all, things seem
to be going very well. Let's hope it continues for 2 more weeks
without any major hiccups.
|
1874.10 | | DELNI::WHEELER | Chickens have no bums | Thu Apr 30 1992 17:36 | 11 |
|
re .-1
I had no problems changing/modifing my ROGAL made reservation
at the hotel I am staying at. My biggest compliant is my
hotel supplied complematary newspaper is not showing up at
my room in the morning.
I will be here for the whole event which included pre-show
setup
/robin wheeler
|
1874.11 | sometimes you need that week end after employee day | CVG::THOMPSON | DECWORLD 92 Earthquake Team | Thu Apr 30 1992 17:45 | 6 |
| RE: .9 I'd hate to see employee day be the Monday. Employee Day is
more then just Employee Day. It is also Dress Rehearsal. Some booths
then need the week end to fix the things that only a full dress
rehearsal show up.
Alfred
|
1874.12 | Get with the times | ACOSTA::MIANO | John - NY Retail Banking Resource Cntr | Thu Apr 30 1992 19:10 | 5 |
| RE: <<< Note 1874.8 by WHYNOW::NEWMAN "I am NOT a bottlecap!" >>>
> But of course... It's VMS!
Don't you mean "Open VMS"?
|
1874.13 | I'll answer for Bob | FUNYET::ANDERSON | I never inhaled | Thu Apr 30 1992 19:52 | 1 |
| Yes. And as of July, OpenVMS.
|
1874.14 | Can it have a silly walk, too? | CARAFE::GOLDSTEIN | Global Village Idiot | Fri May 01 1992 15:06 | 9 |
| > Yes. And as of July, OpenVMS.
I guess we're kissing VMS goodbye. Too bad; it was a nice operating
system, and made lots of money in its day. But I can't imagine anybody
new buying something with such a funny hat on.
"Attention Parents. As of now, I am no longer Calvin. My name is
Calvin The Magnificent!"
(from memory) - Bill Watterson
|
1874.15 | | WHYNOW::NEWMAN | I am NOT a bottlecap! | Fri May 01 1992 22:02 | 4 |
| Not all systems are running Open VMS :-)
One is running VMS V5.4-3, another is running VMS V5.5 and a third is
running Open VMS Alpha.
|
1874.16 | HP trying to nudge into DECworld | DIODE::CROWELL | Jon Crowell | Sun May 03 1992 16:31 | 8 |
| During the first week HP had a large truck with special ads parked out
front of DECworld. What a sleezy move. The State police give them
a ticket and told them to keep the truck out.
I also saw a big white limo with and HP logo on the side, it was riding
around. Strange...
|
1874.17 | | CREATV::QUODLING | Ken, Me, and a cast of extras... | Mon May 04 1992 01:04 | 4 |
| We can't really get too indignant, we have similar at HP trade shows...
q
|
1874.18 | Ad in Digital Review | VMSVTP::S_WATTUM | OSI Applications Engineering, West | Mon May 04 1992 10:34 | 5 |
| Not so strange. HP ran a full page advert in Digital Review saying they'd
give free limo rides from DECworld to the local HP place to show people
"real" computing at work (or something like that).
--Scott
|
1874.19 | HP Billboard | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Mon May 04 1992 10:41 | 6 |
| I also heard that HP had a big billboard outside the Trade Center on
opening day. It read, "The World's Fastest RISC Machine Is Not In This
Building." (Or words to that effect)
Pretty aggresive.
|
1874.20 | The HP billboard | BOSEDF::FEATHERSTON | Ed Featherston | Mon May 04 1992 14:14 | 9 |
| ' The world's fastest RISC machine is not found at DECWorld, but at RISCWorld.
For free transportation from DECWorld to our International Workstation demo
center call 1-800-xxx-xxxx'.
They tried parking in front, police told them to move out, so they spent the
day driving back and forth in front of the Trade Center (this was last Monday,
I haven't seen them since)
/ed/
|
1874.21 | The Facts on Hotel Reservations | MYGUY::LANDINGHAM | Mrs. Kip | Mon May 04 1992 18:40 | 14 |
| Several back re hotel rates: All DECWORLD Staff were advised of the
deadline/cutoff for making hotel reservations. There were good
reasons for the deadline-- including the rates. There are also very
good, sound, business reasons for using Rogal. Digital is not getting
raked by any stretch of the imagination.
BTW: The show is going very well. All areas of DECWORLD are well
attended. Feedback is positive, from Digital execs and customers
alike.
Regards,
Marcia Landingham
DECWORLD Program Office
|
1874.22 | | CREATV::QUODLING | Ken, Me, and a cast of extras... | Mon May 04 1992 23:48 | 21 |
| re. <<< Note 1874.21 by MYGUY::LANDINGHAM "Mrs. Kip" >>>
-< The Facts on Hotel Reservations >-
> Several back re hotel rates: All DECWORLD Staff were advised of the
> deadline/cutoff for making hotel reservations. There were good
> reasons for the deadline-- including the rates. There are also very
> good, sound, business reasons for using Rogal. Digital is not getting
> raked by any stretch of the imagination.
Actually the only comment in this note and its replies concerning hotel
accomodation, was someone from LKG complaining that they weren't
getting their morning paper at their hotel. Why were are putting people
in hotels within reasonable commuting distance of their own homes I
don't know...
There was dicussion elsewhere, however, about Rogal. How their
negotiated rates were higher than available from just asking for a
cheap rate at the front desk.
q
|
1874.23 | Ouch! I've been gouged! | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Tue May 05 1992 01:01 | 12 |
| Ok, explain this: VTX Travel says the Digital-negotiated rate at the Logan
Hilton is $99/night. I paid $120/night through Rogal. I inquired about this
when making reservations with Rogal and at check in at the Hilton and after a
fair amount of "uhhhh, errrr, duhhh" I was told the $99 was a "restricted rate"
and that the $120 rate was the best I could get. SO, when I stay at the Logan
Hilton for a few nights sometime when DECworld isn't happening, I get a lower
rate... and when the hotel knows its going to have a sh*tload of guests
practically guaranteed, they hit them with a higher rate? Sounds like a load
of crap to me.
Jim
|
1874.24 | the full story on hotels | MILPND::NICHOLLS | | Tue May 05 1992 09:56 | 21 |
| It turns out that the Digital rate (the cheaper one) is only for a few
rooms, and not for large events. The only way that the hotels will hold
large blocks of rooms for us is if a higher rate is
negotiated...because of the risk of holding them. Rate negotiations
took place a long time ago, and Digital was closely involved. It's like
the airlines, there are lots of rates. This time of year, with so many
college graduations, etc. it is very difficult to get 55,000 room
nights (that's no exaggeration) held for our event. And so we agree to
the rates (which are higher than their posted rates, more than their
discounted specials.) In turn, the hotels hold the rooms, and we now
need to fill them. In '90 many people went out on their own and booked
rooms, trying to save the Company money...and the rooms that were held
were left empty, so we paid twice! So sometimes you just have to trust
the system. What may seem obvious, isn't always the whole story.
Anyway, DECWORLD is going well...over 8200 customers came through last
week, and I'm hearing lots of success stories of business that has been
closed. The staff has been great and upbeat, which is really contagious
with customers.
Deb
|
1874.25 | What risk? | TRCP39::miller | Bob Miller, DTN 637-3461 | Tue May 05 1992 10:38 | 9 |
| Re: .24
What risk of holding them? You said yourself that we paid twice (i.e. we
incurred the cost of the empty room) in '90. It seem to me that the hotel
can only profit at our expense. Are we sure that an empty room will not be
used by the hotel for a late night check-in? I cannot claim any knowledge
of booking large blocks of hotel rooms, but it appears to me that we should
of negotiated a special rate in our favor, not the hotel's.
|
1874.26 | dropped the ball again! | GOLF::WILSON | | Tue May 05 1992 12:34 | 9 |
| This is contrary to the way business usually works. Normally, if
you reserve or buy a large block of ANYTHING you get a better
rate, not a higher rate. If Rogal's commission is based on a
percentage of what Digital pays, where is the incentive for them
to negotiate a better rate?
But then, nothing surprises me here any more...
Rick
|
1874.27 | | VMSVTP::S_WATTUM | OSI Applications Engineering, West | Tue May 05 1992 14:05 | 11 |
| Re .20
>' The world's fastest RISC machine is not found at DECWorld, but at RISCWorld.
>For free transportation from DECWorld to our International Workstation demo
>center call 1-800-xxx-xxxx'.
And I heard a rumor that if you were to peek inside the HP box, you'd find a
prototype quantity chip whose name happens to be the first letter in the
greek alphabet. ;-)
--Scott
|
1874.28 | re hotels, don't buy that line for a minute | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Walk softly, carry a megawatt laser | Tue May 05 1992 23:19 | 29 |
| re hotels, I don't believe one word of the "this is the best we could
do" crap. And re a few back, I just stayed at the Logan Hilton (a pit,
btw) this week 1 night; the "Rogal rate" was $130, not the $120 that
you stated you paid? Calling several hotels in the downtown Boston
area (including the "prime" hotels such as the Long Wharf, the Park
Plaza, etc), NOT mentioning DECworld, Digital or Rogal, I was quoted
rates (and availability!!) that were at least $10 and as much as $40
per night LESS than the "Rogal negotiated rate".
Also, my night this week at the Logan Hilton was made thru Rogal,
changing from the hotel Rogal had me booked at, based on a request from
my manager to find something "more reasonable". Rogal changed me to
the Hilton, but neglected to cancel me out of the other hotel. Now the
other hotel is trying to charge me as a no-show, since the reservation
was never cancelled. Rogal has been unresponsive in trying to fix this
problem. Is Digital (ie, me) really liable here, since it was
guaranteed with MY credit card?
As was mentioned (.9?), we are a computer company, can't we handle
something like this on our own? Based on what I've seen first-hand,
you're going to have to present some pretty hard facts to make me
believe that using Rogal to handle DECworld housing was the most
beneficial decision, either from a business aspect or from a financial
aspect. It appears to me that the "Rogal negotiated rates" were
negotiated with the goal of being able to obtain the highest possible
commissions -- at Digital's ultimate expense.
Sorry, I don't buy it.
Jon
|
1874.29 | | DELNI::WHEELER | Chickens have no bums | Wed May 06 1992 09:23 | 14 |
| re: <<< Note 1874.22 by CREATV::QUODLING "Ken, Me, and a cast of extras..." >>>
>> Actually the only comment in this note and its replies concerning hotel
>> accomodation, was someone from LKG complaining that they weren't
>> getting their morning paper at their hotel. Why were are putting people
>> in hotels within reasonable commuting distance of their own homes I
>> don't know...
There are alot of aspects to the show that must be handled after
normal show hours and on weekends. People are on call 7 x 24 to
ensure the network is up, systems are up, etc. People are also
working second and third shifts to ensure we have no surprises
when the floor opens to Staff at 7am.
|
1874.30 | I was impressed yesterday. Esp ALPHA corner. | ALOS01::MULLER | they just SERP away! | Wed May 06 1992 12:15 | 2 |
| Won the boat race too but they would not give me the big picture
because I was an employee. Fred.
|
1874.31 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed May 06 1992 14:19 | 1 |
| What's the boat race? Do you have to row around the wharf?
|
1874.32 | Boat race and great show... | CHAMPS::CHASE | | Wed May 06 1992 16:05 | 12 |
|
The boat race is kind of neat. There's one of the prototype America3
set up on the second level by the entrance. There a four or so
DECstations running some boat design software. So, when each of the
four designer/racers has completed his/her design, it's shipped over
to a PC running something called Matador (I think). This is the race
part. On a big monitor you watch your boat compete against the others
and a computer generated America. If you win you get your picture
taken on the America3. Kind of gimmicky, but fun.
A guy in my group won. When he told them he was a Deccie, he sort of
got the bum's rush...told him they would mail him his picture.
|
1874.33 | Digtal employees disqualified for good reasons. | EMDS::ROSINSKI | | Wed May 06 1992 17:06 | 33 |
| The race software was developed by simplifying the actual software used
in the design of the America3 syndicate boats, to the point that a
non-proficiant computer user could design a boat in about five minutes,
and race it in the computer. Gimmicky yes, but then the booth was meant
for fun. If the workers at the booth were doing their job, and I was one
of them, they should have been stressing the importance the application
of leading edge technology has in launching a successful America's Cup
campaign. The resulting boat design as an aside has been called "a
rocket" by Dennis Conner, the previous cup winner who was racing
against America3 for the right to defend the cup this year. He lost
that right seven races to four in the best of thirteen finals.
The unfortunate, and unforseen problem we encountered in the first few
days of the show was that Digital employees, not customers, were
monopolising the demo. Customers, who apparently didn't have time to
waste, would see the line of Digital employees at the machines, and
just walk away. The creation of the prize, which required taking the
winners photo, scanning it into a computer, lengthy manipulation of the
image, and finally printing, took about twenty to thirty minutes each.
The operator quickly got bogged down. On Wednesday or Thursday of the
first week it was decided that the best way to address both problems,
was to allow Digital employees to race boats, but disqualify them from
the picture taking.
Quite frankly, although I wasn't involved in the decision, I agree
fully with it. We had Digital employees, booth workers or salesmen,
spending hours at the demo, repeatedly attempting to win, in order to
get the prize. Who was taking care of their duties at DECWorld? I
don't know. :')
Happy Sails...
Al
|
1874.34 | I did my job. | ALOS01::MULLER | they just SERP away! | Wed May 06 1992 18:02 | 3 |
| Well I took my customers there and taught them how to win. There
is a logic to it after you watch the wind patterns in a race or two.
I am an instructor pilot but not a sailor. - Fred
|
1874.35 | Good show, too few customer | RT95::HU | | Thu May 07 1992 10:35 | 21 |
|
I spend less than 2-3 hours tour the floor. From exhibition point of
view, it's indeed very impressive effort for such coporation events.
Alpha Showcase definitely worthwhile to see it. It beat HP, Sun
in handsome /performance/speed.
eXcursion is very positively show how we can create value added
solution for best of both world.
There's more on Token Ring, Relay Frame demo stuff.
OSF/1 and Open/VMS is the buzz word for almost every both now. I wish
this time we get more homogeneous message for customer.
I had to agree one point mentioned in earlier reply that more DEC
employee than customer on the floor, at least when I spend time there.
You can easily get idea by viewing their badge.
Michael...
|
1874.36 | Great work being done at DECWorld | EMDS::ROSINSKI | | Thu May 07 1992 10:37 | 17 |
| I spoke with a couple of salesmen who had won a certificate to
have their picture taken during the first couple of days, and had given
them to their customers. The customers were thrilled about it. I also
passed out finished photos to several customers, and it was great to
see their reactions to it.
It was a big hit with the customers, and that's the name of the
DECWorld game. Some sales people used it to their advantage with their
customers, and I was impressed at how they put the customer first above
their own wants. Others did not. Sorry if my previous entry was
offensive to anyone. There certainly are many many Digital employees
who take their responsibilities at DECWorld very seriously. I hope it
shows up soon in our balance sheet. ;')
Happy Sails...
Al
|
1874.37 | DECWORLD isn't just for customers | CVG::THOMPSON | DECWORLD 92 Earthquake Team | Thu May 07 1992 12:12 | 37 |
| RE: More DEC employees then customers at the show. I suspect that
DEC employees at DECWORLD fall into two categories. One group working
the booths and a second group being account management people coming
with the customers.
As someone who spent time in the field I think it is very important
that the account team know what the customer sees and hears. Also
these kinds of demos can be very helpful in closing sales if there
is a "closer" there. I don't believe engineers and most other people
working booths are the right people to close business. So the sales
types have to be there.
And of course you have to have technical people and prepared speakers
to do the demos and answer questions on the spot. And you want to make
sure that someone doesn't have to wait 20 minutes to ask a question
between demos.
That accounts of much of the large number of DEC employees there. As
for the rest, if there really are "extra" people there, I suspect that
most of them are taking advantage of a chance to educate themselves on
products that they would not otherwise get to see. not all customers
get to come to DECWORLD. It is helpful for people who will be talking
to those customers to actually know what they are talking about. Being
able to say "we were showing these at DECWORLD and so they ..." is a
lot better the saying "I read about these in ...".
All too often a field persons first experience with a product, hardware
or software, is when they see it a a customer site. That's not good as
it puts them off balance at the start.
Also DECWORLD is a unique opportunity for field people (and engineers)
to learn about and see third party software and solutions. A great
learning experience for those with open minds and a chance to look
around.
Alfred
|
1874.38 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Customer Publications Consulting | Thu May 07 1992 13:01 | 8 |
| True, there is a rather large contingent of employees at DECworld, but
because the CSOs and the customers have badges that look essentially
the same as we staffers, it's difficult to tell at first glance who's
who. I think saying there are a lot of employees overshadows the
numbers of customers attending DECworld '92, which according to my
sources, are exceeding the numbers who attended in 1990.
Mike
|
1874.39 | DECworld: The only means of gathering customer requirements | BIGJOE::DMCLURE | DEC's Tops In Desktops! | Thu May 07 1992 14:28 | 14 |
| I haven't been to DECworld since 1987. I also haven't
spoken to a "customer" since DECworld '87. As a Senior
Software Engineer with 8 years at DEC, I know of relatively
few reliable means of collecting customer requirements short
of talking to the actual customers myself.
It is for these reasons that I sincerely hope I will
be able to go to DECworld this year. Unfortunately, due
to delivery dates based on management commitments made long
ago beyond my control, I won't know if I'll be able to go
until late next week. Hopefully the show won't be over by
the time I get there.
-davo
|
1874.40 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Thu May 07 1992 14:53 | 23 |
| RE: .39 (davo)
DECworld is not your only way to poll the customer environment. You should
align yourself with key Sales Support resources who have customers using the
type of products that you design.
You will gain insight into how the products solve real world customer problems,
(and where they don't), and the Sales Support person will be overjoyed at having
access to such a knowledgeable resource.
In the end, Digital wins more business, increases customer satisfaction, and
is positioned to build more competitve follow-on products.
The best product in the world is not necessarily the one that's engineered best...
Its the one the customer believes they can't win without!
My $.02
Bob
P.S. I think that the intention of the Partners programs are to facilitate the
above. If Engineering management is not promoting this behavior, then
I would elevate the issue through the ODP.
|
1874.41 | "Rust Never Sleeps" | ICS::PALLIES | | Thu May 07 1992 17:30 | 23 |
| From yesterday's Boston Herald -
"Ex-state tourism chief Richard Rust is back in Boston handling
logistics for the massive DECWorld conference.
"Rust, you may remember, was convicted of federal charges of
defrauding the commonwealth while in office and was sentenced to two
months of 'home detention' in January. (Sounds like what you give a
naughty teen-ager.)
"Now that he's been sprung, he's picked up work from Boston conference
planning czar Andrew Rogal whose company is involved in the massive
effort (hotel reservations, transportation, etc.) for the computer
company's annual conference.
"Rust, former head of the Massachusetts Office of Travel & Tourism,
seems to have shaken off his legal woes and is out and about on the
social scene, too.
"The hospitality honcho was spotted at a nightclub opening with Rogal
last week and again yesterday, dining at the Bostonian Hotel.
"File under: Free At Last."
|
1874.42 | Official Hotel Rate Story. | LARVAE::NOBLE | | Thu May 07 1992 18:34 | 113 |
| DECWORLD '92 HOTEL RATES
A number of questions regarding DECWORLD '92 hotel rates have been asked by
Digital staff and employees planning to attend the event. These are
legitimate and reasonable questions from individuals concerned about
company expenditures. Listed below are the three major issues and
explanations which will give all interested parties an understanding of how
the hotel rate structure was negotiated and how it controls Digital's
costs.
1. DECWORLD'92 rates are higher than VTX Preferred Individual Transient
Business Rates.
The VTX preferred rates are specifically negotiated as individual
transient business rates. Hotels take positions on individual transient
rates based on average expected sales, with the expectation that the
number of rooms to be occupied at the reduced rate will be limited.
Hotels cannot and will not commit so many rooms to a drastically
discounted rate as to make it impossible for them to meet average daily
rate goals.
In order to hold a large number of rooms for a lengthy period of time
without any financial commitment on the part of Digital, it was
necessary to negotiate special DECWORLD '92 discounted rates. These
rates are market oriented based on demand for the hotel, time of year
and other business already booked by groups competing for the same room
inventory.
In the specific case of the Guest Quarters, Digital has a tiered rate
which includes two rooms at $75.00 and 35 rooms at the $99.00 per night
VTX rate. Other hotel contracts provide us with complimentary
room nights and half price rooms designed to reduce Digital's costs.
At DECWORLD '90 we had no complimentary rooms or other reduced rates.
2. DECWORLD '92 rates as compared to DECWORLD '90 rates.
A number of questions have arisen as to why virtually every hotel is
more expensive in 1992 than 1990. The major reason is that hotel rates
in Boston are seasonally driven, with the spring - April, May, June -
and the autumn - September, October, November - as high season. Hotels
are able to command a premium during these months of the year over
other times of the year. While Boston hotels are happy to have an
excellent piece of business - and make no mistake that DECWORLD '92 is
important to them - they will not provide massive inventory for any
organization unwilling to pay the rate. This is simply because there
are other customers standing in line for the same resources. For this
reason we will always obtain less expensive prices in the summer
(DECWORLD '90) as compared to the spring or autumn.
Naturally, those hotels with the greatest demand, such as the
Marriott Longwharf, will seek to charge the highest rate. However,
the DECWORLD '92 rate is still below the average daily rate of other
group business booked at the hotel both before, during and after
DECWORLD '92. In fact, the Marriott Longwharf has resisted taking
as many DECWORLD '92 attendees as in 1990 due to enormous demand for
their hotel.
Other hotels have been far more cooperative and the increase in their
rates is modest. This is probably due to the fact that they do not
hold as strong a market share in Boston as the Marriott.
In addition to the increases due to seasonal market driven demand,
hotels do incur increases in their operating costs which they seek to
pass along to users if the demand exists. Given that we are operating
in the highest demand season, we are faced with the choice of not
taking rooms in prime locations or accepting the rate increases. There
are other citywide conventions and college graduations during the
DECWORLD '92 timeframe.
Electro '92, a major electronic and computer trade show, is meeting in
Boston over part of the DECWORLD '92 dates. This meeting and trade
show comes to Boston and the Hynes Convention Center every two years
and has made a long term commitment to Boston as a meeting site. It
would be expected that they would be able to buy their volume based
convention rooms at the lowest possible price, even during peak season.
However, a comparison of the Electro '92 hotel package (they are using
9 of the same hotels as DECWORLD'92) finds that we are less expensive
in 8 of the 9 hotel properties, by as much as $20.00 per room night.
However, Electro is getting something for its premium price and
advanced planning. At certain key hotels it does have significantly
larger blocks of rooms.
3. Commissionable Convention Rates
The DECWORLD'92 hotel package is made up of commissionable convention
rates. The conversion to this type of rate structure will save Digital
approximately $500,000 in actual registration costs. That is, the
registration costs have been reduced by offsetting hotel commissions
earned by the registration company. Additionally, Digital has had to
sign no direct hotel contracts thereby limiting liability and
eliminating any potential need for tying up deposits in order to
operate the DECWORLD '92 program.
In no case have all hotels raised rates to fully cover the commission
as a way to recover costs. Instead, most have accepted commissionable
rates as a cost of doing business. In fact, many hotels such as the
Lafayette and Meridien are actually taking in fewer net dollars when
adjusted for commissionable rates and season.
Hopefully, this explains the DECWORLD '92 hotel rate situation. Please
remember that Digital has signed no hotel contracts, has had to make no
deposits, carries no liability for use of the rooms, has reduced its
expenditures for registration services by approximately $500,000 and
will acquire complimentary and other discounted rooms. We have also
negotiated hotel rates during peak season in an extremely market driven
environment which are less than other major meetings being held in
Boston during the same dates.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Regards,
Roger Shaller
DECWORLD Purchasing Manager
|
1874.43 | | QBUS::M_PARISE | Southern, but no comfort | Thu May 07 1992 19:19 | 8 |
|
re: .42
Would that all our concerns and apprehensions regarding Digital's
seemingly questionable high-level decisions could be so satisfactorily
and professionally explained. Thank you, for that entry.
/Mike
|
1874.44 | I wish we had more people willing to give out solid information | SMAUG::GARROD | Floating on a wooden DECk chair | Thu May 07 1992 23:58 | 20 |
| Re .42
I'd like to echo the comment made in .43. Thank you for taking the time
to enter this. It may be a pain responding to people that raise issues
but responses such as this, I believe, really serve to raise the morale
of employees.
I just wish some of the high level execs in the company could be
equally open and definitive with information.
By the way I've heard a lot of positive comments made about DECworld
by both customers and salesreps (I've been working a booth). Just today
a friend of mine who works for "National Semiconductor" commented on
how well organized the show was and contrasted it favourably to another
trade show. I've also seen many sales reps thanking booth staff because
they're happy with what their customers are being told.
I hope it pays off for Digital.
Dave
|
1874.45 | EXTEND the season | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Fri May 08 1992 05:40 | 8 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
I think the DECville arrangement was somewhat better (for us). Because
the Cannes area is extremely seasonal, Digital plans DECville to be on
the END of the high Season. The hotels are REALLY interested in this,
because it extends their high season by two/three weeks. As a result,
Digital gets VERY good rates (for Cannes, anyway). I think the
customers pay rather more though (full rates? I don't know).
|
1874.46 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri May 08 1992 11:05 | 1 |
| Why was DECWORLD booked for the hotels' busy season?
|
1874.47 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Fri May 08 1992 11:59 | 9 |
| If I understand .42 correctly, under no circumstances should Digital be paying
for a reservation that we have cancelled through Rogal.
So in answer to the question posed in .26, I would suggest that you contact
the author of .42 and explain your disatisfaction with Rogal. Unlike the
hotels which we must do business with due to their location, we CAN change
travel service organizations if Rogal is unresponsive.
Bob
|
1874.48 | Sailing exhibit was popular | DELNI::MOONEY | | Fri May 08 1992 22:00 | 20 |
|
I also worked the photo taking for the sailing exhibit during the second week
of the show, the people coming through were mostly customers and their DECsales
reps. Overall the boat design challenge, display boat (Jayhawk first boat built
for the America3 campaign) and exhibits had the desired impact, giving the
customers a bit of fun while showing them what DEC hardware and software can
do.
This was an excellent idea quite well done.
Also this was my first time working a trade show, I was impressed with the DEC sales
people who were with their clients. Other Deccies were understanding once we explained
because of the numbers our need to handle only customers.
I enjoyed helping and would do it again.
Didn't see any sign at all of HP, except getting whipped in the Alpha
demo.
/mike
|
1874.49 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Fri May 08 1992 23:24 | 14 |
| Re .42: Thanks for the excellent explanation, Roger.
Now tell us why your name is one ALL of the "Spirit of Boston" tickets... :-)
Regards,
Jim
p.s.: Roger and I go way back and I was the first to point out to him that his
name was on all of the cruise tickets. Since he's the DECworld Purchasing
Manager, its not too surprising, but he was quite astounded when he saw
it. Its a good thing they didn't restrict those going on the cruise
based on the name on the ticket, eh?
|
1874.50 | DECWorld success!!!! | F18::ROBERT | | Sun May 10 1992 13:06 | 32 |
| From someone that was demoing the Development Engineering station in
the Aerospace area, showing our ASD/SEE solution that the F22 contract
is using.
I just got home this past friday evening. Two days last week, they
had to stop admitting people into DECWorld floor. We had too many
people in the WTC. So the customers are coming.
From my booth, we were constantly demoing our software from around
8:30 AM on tuesday to 3:00 PM, then I was able to take a break. This
last week on wednesday and thursday, there were 6 groups of customers,
that had their Digital sales rep with them, after demoing ASD/SEE they
told their sales rep to get someone to them to explain how they could
order these tools.
They see the value of this software package, and they want it. This
software package is not cheap. One customer said that he had paid
$85,000 for one piece of software back in 1985, which contained one
seat. Ours costs from $20,000 to $100,000+
Our particular portion of the Government section was a complete
success. We had interest from all areas. Both commercial and
government.
There are success stories at DECWorld this year.
We will see some of it within the next 6 months, and more within the
next year.
My .2 cents.
Dave
|
1874.51 | | MR4DEC::SRINIVASAN | | Wed May 13 1992 22:44 | 31 |
| I have to agree with comment that there were too many DECies for each
customer at any given point of time on the floor. IHMO some of them were
just acting busy or using this show as an excuse to meet some of their
pals...
There were lot of marketing types who is supposedly herding around the
customers ( At least that is what some of them said ). While this may
be true for most of the marketing folks, I do not believe that all DECies
had truly busy with the customers all the time.
I happened to know some of these marketing types..
They have NO application knowledge
They have NO hardware knowledge
They have NO industry knowledge
They have NO software knowledge
I wonder what they have been telling the customers ...
May be they talked about Boston weather or how good the food is at "Spirit
of Boston" !? I wonder what the customer might have thought about some
of these phony marketing types...
Yes ! They all were BUSY with the customers !
Nobody asked - Just my opinion ...
Jay
PS; Hopefully at least in the next DECworld, they will restrict the
number of DECies in the floor at any given time ...
|
1874.52 | | ASICS::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | Thu May 14 1992 03:02 | 18 |
|
> They have NO application knowledge
> They have NO hardware knowledge
> They have NO industry knowledge
> They have NO software knowledge
Is this urban legend or what? I've heard this level of rhetoric aimed
at marketeers for years, and I can tell you that although that may be
true of some, I personally know some "Marketing Types" with more
engineering experience and knowlege than most people will ever have.
Mayhap I know a different subset to the "some" of the "marketing types"
that you refer to, but I refuse to believe that we employ many people so
patently inadequate.
- andy
|
1874.53 | Here we go again ! | CHEFS::HEELAN | Cordoba, lejana y sola | Thu May 14 1992 06:11 | 10 |
| re .51
Perhaps the other thing they DON'T have is technological arrogance, and
their added-value is that they DO understand how to talk to customers
AND understand their basic business problems.
When is this company going to stop sniping from functional redoubts
really regard itself as a team ?
John
|
1874.54 | | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Thu May 14 1992 09:04 | 11 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
To talk to customers, you have to be a bit closer to them than in the
same restaurant on the same junket.
> Mayhap I know a different subset to the "some" of the "marketing types"
> that you refer to, but I refuse to believe that we employ many people so
> patently inadequate.
Want a list of names or groups? 1/2 :-)
|
1874.55 | | ASICS::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | Thu May 14 1992 09:36 | 3 |
| Be positive, list the good ones.
Start with people like Bill Gassman, Tom Welsh....
|
1874.56 | working DECWORLD has been a real education | CVG::THOMPSON | DECWORLD 92 Earthquake Team | Thu May 14 1992 10:08 | 21 |
| I guess I've been lucky. There are a lot of top notch people working
at the booth I've spent this week at. There are two type here:
Technical and marketing. I think we need both. The marketing people
may not have a clue as to doing a SYSGEN or helping to restart a
cluster after we kill the power to half of it but they do know a
lot. They knows features and benefits. They know what the competition
has and how we match up. They know schedules, futures, directions,
and strategies. They are well prepared with the answers to most
common questions. And they know enough to bring in a technical person
when the questions get deep.
The technical people keep the systems running. Not always easy when
you have ~16 systems in 4 clusters and several stand along nodes.
Especially when you power down 5 nodes 4 times a day. They are also
available and ready to talk to customers about real systems and real
answers to real problems.
Could we get by with fewer people? Perhaps but I wouldn't suggest it.
We certainly need the mix we have.
Alfred
|
1874.57 | Teamwork! | MYGUY::LANDINGHAM | Mrs. Kip | Thu May 14 1992 12:04 | 10 |
| You hit the nail on the head, "TOP NOTCH PEOPLE."
DECWORLD is a Sales event. It is for Sales and their customers.
Marketeers help in the sales effort. Technical people keep the wheels
turning. This is a tremendous team effort and together, we've all
worked hard to make this the best DECWORLD ever!
Rgds,
Marcia Landingham
|
1874.58 | With so many people .... | MORO::BEELER_JE | One mean Marine! | Thu May 14 1992 12:27 | 42 |
| With all this talk of so many marketing people around ... how did this
happen:
I was with my customer waking through what shall remain and un-named
area. We encountered an area with a small sign listing the virtues of
the product which was being demonstrated:
"Jerry, what's this, never heard of it, sounds interesting"
I wasn't aware of the product so turned to someone nearby with a
"staff" badge and asked if there was anyone who could explain that
particular product/demo:
"I don't know, I think he stepped away for a while"
Oops, flags are going up. I asked the receptionist at this area if
there was anyone who could help demo/explain this product to my
customers:
"I don't know where he is, do you want me to see if I can find
someone to help?"
My customers were standing there with their hands folded in amazement.
I *wanted* to respond with something to the effect of "no, I was asking
just for the Hell of it" but being the professional that I am ...
simply asked that someone be found who could help! We stood there for
nearly 10 minutes ... with not one single response.
Being the master of diversion ... I told my customers that we'd try to
come back to that area later but we had to continue our walk through
the floor.
Needless to say, I was more than mildly upset. My customers were not
amuzed.
Fortunately, this was a rare exception and not the rule.
We never returned to that area.
Jerry
|
1874.59 | 99% | MYGUY::LANDINGHAM | Mrs. Kip | Thu May 14 1992 12:54 | 20 |
| Jerry,
I'm very sorry for the negative experience you had.
To eliminate this problem, we've had special training in many areas--
including demo training, Sunday orientations (each Sunday), to include
overview, and "content cluster" drill downs. Part of that orientation
included how to respond to questions or how to find answers to ques-
tions that were outside your particular area of expertise. The folks
in each content area with white carnations are there to provide expert
guidance. The folks in the gazebo and other information booths are
also very capable of finding the right answers to questions. And
lastly, the Program Team is very carefully trying to monitor and assist
in situations such as your's.
BTW: Sales reps were welcome to attend the Sunday orientations as
well.
Rgds,
marcia
|
1874.60 | Not for concern | MORO::BEELER_JE | One mean Marine! | Thu May 14 1992 16:29 | 6 |
| No, Marcia, make that 99.999999% successful.
One singular, very isolated event. If *everything* was perfect it
would scare the dickens out of me!
Jerry
|
1874.61 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Fri May 15 1992 03:06 | 63 |
| I had a negative experience that really floored me (no pun intended). I'm in
Sales Support and was without my customers at the time, but wanted to
follow-up on a question they had. I went to the appropriate area and asked one
of the MANY staff people:
Me: "Can you tell me how many licenses we have sold for Product XXX?"
Staff: After looking at my badge stated with a rather uncooperative tone to
his voice: "We don't give out that kind of information, why do you
want it?"
Me: "Well, my customer is interested in the product, but there are
factions within his company that don't think XXX is very widely used
and they asked me the question. We do have the opportunity to generate
some revenue here."
Staff: Now glaring at me with a 'get outta my face, you jerk' attitude:
"We don't release that information to customers, do you think we
tell the public how many VAXes we sold?"
Me: "Uhhh, yes, actually we just announced our <insert large number>
VAX sold. Look, I'm going to get this information for my customer,
even if it requires a PID, so if you know the number can you please
give it to me."
Staff: "No, go find it somewhere else."
Me: "well, thank you very much!"
I went to the other side of Product XXX's display area and asked another Staff
person who immediately gave me the number of licenses we currently have sold
for XXX. I then found the Product Manager for XXX and told her of my recent
experience and then found the person who was responsible for that exhibit area
and told him. I knew there was some training done for the staff people and that
attitude and helpfulness where stressed. Obviously, this person was not paying
attention to any of that. If I had the authority, that guy would have been an
ex-DECie faster than you could "rightsized". Fortunately, my customer was
nowhere around. Supposedly this guy was from engineering and didn't deal with
people much. I don't care how good he was technically, he had no business
being on the floor of DECworld.
Add to this the number of Staff people I saw just standing around shootin' the
breeze and I just didn't have a good feeling about the numbers (too many) or
quality of people (not knowleadgeable about the products/technologies they
were supposed to discribe/demo, etc). In certain areas only a few experts were
available who really knew a particular product or technology and they had
lines of customers waiting to talk to them while other Staff members stood
nearby twiddling their thumbs.
Luckily, I was able to minimize the impact of these shortcomings on my
customers and they were very impressed with the show.
Regards,
Jim
Senior Sales Support Consultant
P.S.: To all of those who worked so hard on DECworld, please don't take this
as a condemnation of the whole affair. I was very impressed and think it
will generate many millions of dollars for Digital. With the resources
we have at Digital, having the best people on the floor should have been
easy.
|
1874.62 | Say "I WILL SPEND DIGITAL'S MONEY AS IF IT WERE MINE" | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Fri May 15 1992 05:25 | 9 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
I don't for one minute say we don't need them, I'm just saying there is
a great opportunity for some rationalisation in this area. I'm
impressed by some parts of marketing in Digital, esp. VMS Marketing,
they've done a LOT of good work in the last year.
Some other places, well I think I'm being charitable when I say that
they require looking at with a view to introducing accountability.
|
1874.63 | How the press saw it (copyright 1992 Dow Jones PIR) | FURFCE::WELKIN::ADOERFER | It's a stop word | Sun May 17 1992 22:49 | 92 |
|
headline: . DECWORLD '92 COMES TO A CLOSE AMID CUSTOMERS' AND CITY'S PRAISES.
BOSTON, May 15 /PRNewswire/ --Today, after three weeks of enthusiastic
response from customers, DECWORLD '92 came to a close at Boston's World Trade
Center. In spite of the still weak global economic conditions, 30,000
business executives from around the world traveled to Boston to attend Digital
Equipment Corporation's (NYSE: DEC) international customer symposium to learn
about and to see the solutions that Digital and its partners are providing to
meet today's business needs. Boston officials acknowledged DECWORLD's role in
contributing to the local economy stating that nearly $50 million was
generated for local business by those attending the solutions exhibition.
According to Deborah Nicholls, chairperson for DECWORLD '92, "This was a
tremendous success. The attendance was 20 percent higher than we had
originally forecast resulting in approximately 500,000 customer relationship
hours, time Digital employees spent working with customers, during the three
weeks. Throughout DECWORLD, the atmosphere on the floor was positive and
charged with enthusiasm. This was true of both our customers and our
employees."
Beyond its function as a solutions showcase featuring demonstrations,
workshops, and one-on-one consulting sessions, DECWORLD is also one of
Digital's most efficient and effective sales and marketing tools. "It's a
customer call on a global scale," says Nicholls. "It goes beyond stimulating
interest. Because customers can actually see and have a hands-on experience
with the solutions that are available today for their business challenges, we
feel that DECWORLD is very successful in shortening the sales cycle."
In addition to the benefits DECWORLD has given to Digital, it also served as
a boon for the local economy. Patrick Moscaritolo, president of the Greater
Boston Convention and Visitors Bureau, Inc., comments, "DECWORLD is the
largest show or convention that happens in Boston. It is five times larger
than the average convention we get in the city. Based on an economic impact
model used by the international association of convention and visitor bureaus,
DECWORLD's guests have spent an estimated $48.9 million on hotels,
restaurants, local transportation, and retail items. In addition, the event
has contributed $1.1 million tax revenue to state and local governments. And
beyond the dollars which are generated, a project of the scope of DECWORLD
generates jobs for all the support that is necessary." DECWORLD '92 Facts and
Figures:
-- Computing power on the DECWORLD floor --
-- Over 1000 MIPS, 500 GB of storage and 1 TB of nearline
storage
-- Over twice the compute power of DECWORLD '90 using only two
thirds of the computer room space
-- 700 workstations performed 350 demonstrations
-- 160 seminars were given daily
-- Over 14,000 messages were sent over the electronic messaging
system set up for the event
-- Almost 14 percent of the customers who attended were from
outside of the United States
-- 26 hotels were used in Boston and Cambridge
-- Between 100 and 500 rooms were used in each hotel every
night
-- There were over 50,000 room nights with guest staying an
average of two and a half days.
-- 7,500 people were carried to and from the World Trade Center
every day through a transportation system made up of 60 buses,
two water shuttles, and helicopters from Digital Aviation
Services
-- Over 75,000 meals were served at breakfast and lunch
-- At snack time, the chocolate chip cookies were the clear
favorites with over 200,000 consumed
DECWORLD is Digital's customer symposium and solutions conference and is the
largest single vendor exhibition in the information technology industry.
Digital Equipment Corporation, headquartered in Maynard, Mass., is the
leading worldwide supplier of networked computer systems, software and
services. Digital pioneered and leads the industry in interactive,
distributed and multivendor computing. Digital and its partners deliver the
power to use the best integrated solutions -- from the desk top to the data
center -- in open information environments.
----
Note To Editors: DECWORLD is a trademark of Digital Equipment Corporation.
/CONTACT: Ralph Cohen of Digital, 508-493-2960/
13:35 EDT
|
1874.64 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Mon May 18 1992 02:37 | 1 |
| Maybe we should go into the chocolate chip cookie business.
|
1874.65 | | F18::ROBERT | | Mon May 18 1992 10:09 | 5 |
| Those cookies were great and also fattening. They were good.
Spent two weeks eating them.
Dave
|
1874.66 | Say it ain't so. | AIDEV::KURAS | Shawn Michaels has left the building. | Mon May 18 1992 10:13 | 7 |
| re -2 or -3: ~700 workstations for 350 demonstrations~
Can someone interpret this statement for me? To me, it seems to
be saying that, on the average, for each demo, 2 workstations are
required. What am I missing here?
thanks, Joe.
|
1874.67 | forgot the VCS to manage the other clusters (we had 4 clusters) | CVG::THOMPSON | DECWORLD 92 Earthquake Team | Mon May 18 1992 10:28 | 12 |
| RE: .66 Things depend on what's being shown. The booth I worked at
had 6 workstations. Two were OMS stations as are required for a MDF
cluster (which we were showing). One was a monitor of activity on an
FT 610 to show the pieces we were "killing" during the demo. Two more
were using DECW$BANNER to show activity continuing on the two main
clusters that we were "doing things too." One more was being used to
show RTR activity across the network. Hard to see how we could have
shown all we did with less.
Alfred
|
1874.68 | A step back | GRANMA::FDEADY | | Mon May 18 1992 11:34 | 5 |
| re. -2.. I'm more concerned about the "1000 mips" and 700 workstations.
Certainly these systems provided more than 1000 mips - right. 8-}
Fred Deady
|
1874.69 | Shurely shome mistake? | TRUCKS::WINWOOD | Life has surface noise too | Tue May 19 1992 04:35 | 5 |
| Similarly, I did a double take on that number. My customer has a
requirement for a 3,000 MIP installation and I'd hate to think he
needs the equivalent of 3 x DECworld's!
Calvin
|
1874.70 | taking names and kickin... | BEING::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Wed May 20 1992 14:32 | 58 |
| I've been catching up on some notes after spending time at a customer
site, and just stumbled upon the discussion about a couple of negative
experiences at DECworld.
Seems to me there are a couple of concerns related to these incidents.
For one thing, despite the training, it seems we still had problems.
Maybe the quality of the training needs to be reviewed? Or at least
the quality of the results.
For another thing, it appears from the postings that there was no
effective mechanism for addressing problems when they did occur.
Maybe it was expected that there would be no problems because of the
training, but if so that seems a foolish error on the part of the
planners. In any case, I certainly hope there was provision for
feedback concerning negative results, and that the channel was used
effectively.
.61> I then found the Product Manager for XXX and told her of my recent
.61> experience and then found the person who was responsible for that exhibit
.61> area and told him. I knew there was some training done for the staff
.61> people and that attitude and helpfulness where stressed. Obviously, this
.61> person was not paying attention to any of that. If I had the authority,
.61> that guy would have been an ex-DECie faster than you could "rightsized".
I hope he was at least an ex-DECworld staffer that quickly.
But sad to say, I expect not. Which to me says that the booth captains
and other management types share culpability.
.61> Supposedly this guy was from engineering and didn't deal with
.61> people much. I don't care how good he was technically, he had no business
.61> being on the floor of DECworld.
Ah, but that's how we reward the good little techies. Many of them are
so narrow-minded that they don't believe they need to attend training,
or take it to heart. They know their skills are so highly valued by
their local management that they'll still go to DECworld, so why
clutter their mind with nonsense about dealing with people...
It would be really interesting to know if there was any control on the
training session attendence, sufficient to find out if the individual
in the example cited did in fact attend training? Even better would be
to know which training session, then that specific session could be
reviewed for effectiveness as well. Ideally, floor badges wouldn't be
issued until prescribed training was successfully completed, and would
be pulled at the slightest hint of a problem, but that's too much to
expect from our present management structure. They can't (or won't)
tackle the tough challenges like raising productivity per employee by
increasing productivity rather than decreasing employees, why should
this be any different?
.61> If I had the authority, that guy would have been an ex-DECie faster
.61> than you could "rightsized".
That would make too much sense. RIFfing based on competence level?
What a concept! Better to let good people in useless groups go while
keeping marginal performers in critical niches on board, right?
|
1874.71 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | ...57 channels, and nothin' on... | Wed May 20 1992 14:55 | 28 |
|
Re .70:
I don't know if this applies to the engineer in question in preceeding
notes. When my group was approached to provide technical support for
DECworld demos, it was decided that none of us could afford to spend
the entire time required, so a number of us were there for one day each.
This was less than optimal for a number of reasons, but the most
important one for this discussion is that we couldn't possibly justify
a day of DECworld training for one day of duty. I did attend a short
training session close to home and focused specifically on the demo,
but none of the "DECworld etiquette" stuff alluded to elsewhere.
The other main problem with this scheduling scheme was that I spent
half of my one day there getting acclimated. (For the first two hours,
I had trouble pointing customers to the nearest rest room.)
My suggestions to those of you who plan the next Deathworld:
o Don't accept one-day staff schedules from anyone, especially
engineering. It's wrong all around. The absolute minimum
committment should be three days, but shoot for a week.
o Insist on the full gamut of training for anyone who will be on the
floor, especially engineering. I'll be the first to admit that
as a group, we tend to be defficient in the social graces required
for this type of work.
|
1874.72 | glad I was there | CVG::THOMPSON | DECWORLD 92 Earthquake Team | Wed May 20 1992 15:03 | 43 |
| There were some 32,000 visitors to DECWORLD 92. Thousands of Digital
employees worked the show. There were probably millions of human
interactions a day. To expect that all of them went well is a bit
unrealistic. I myself had no bad experiences at all in the week I
was there. None.
Bad experiences need to be worked on but I've always believed in the
instructions reported to have been given by John Paul Jones. "Punish
in private, praise in public." I worry sometimes that as a company we
get so involved in beating up one an other and ourselves that we lose
sight of our accomplishments. In my life I try to spend as much time
praising good work as I do criticizing bad. It makes my whole mood
better.
By all means provide feedback to managers whose people do not perform.
But by the same token reward the behavior you do like with proper
praise. Those of you who complained about "bad" behavior did you also
provide praise for people who did more than required? One of the nice
things about DECWORLD was the little stars that were given out for
above the call of duty work. Positive reinforcement is something all
too often lacking. Not that people worked to get little stars but I'm
sure it didn't hurt the people who got them to know they were
appreciated.
From my point of view DECWORLD was terrific! I got to talk to customers
again. I got to tell them about products I believe in and explain how
Digital can solve their problems. I also go to learn a lot about
Digital's products myself. I learned a lot of other things as well.
I learned that DEC people *do* know what teamwork means. The people in
the booth I worked were from a number of different groups. Yet each
person worked as hard as they could to explain all the products a
customer asked about - not just their own. I saw Digital people talking
to other Digital people melt away at the blink of an eye when a
customer came near to ask a question. I saw people excited about
presenting solutions and helping customers. Whether a customer wanted
a detailed presentation or just a pointer to "where are the donuts."
Digital people were ready to help.
DECWORLD made me feel good about Digital, Digital products, and most
of all good about Digital's people. I'm proud to have been part of it.
Alfred
|
1874.73 | I was there, and this is what I saw | VMSMKT::KENAH | Emotional Baggage? Just carry-on. | Wed May 20 1992 18:16 | 18 |
| I have to agree with Alfred. I was there for all three weeks, and by
and large, the staffing at DECworld was professional and competent.
Naturally, in the millions of interactions that occured there were
bound to be screw-ups, but there were many, many more encounters where
the customers walked away feeling valued, informed, and good about what
they'd heard.
Some people see things and notice the patterns; others see the same
thing and notice the exceptions. Neither method of looking at the
world is better than the other; however, all too often those who see
the exceptions speak out, while those who see the patterns stay silent.
Let me speak as one who saw the pattern: the vast majority of
interactions between staff and customer at DECworld were handled
couteously and professionally.
andrew
|
1874.74 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Thu May 21 1992 00:56 | 12 |
| Although the one negative incident I described is getting more than its share
of visibility, I certainly echo the sentiments of the past two replies.
DECworld was a monumental event and it was organized, planned and executed
just about as well as anyone could expect. For our Account Group it more than
fulfilled its purpose. I was proud to be a Digital employee after touring the
exhibition floor. I don't want the one incident I raised to tarnish what was
overall an excellent marketing event for Digital.
regards,
Jim
|
1874.75 | The rule may have been there. | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Thu May 21 1992 07:03 | 10 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...
If I remember correctly, it's a requirement of the DECville assignments
that:
Only assignments of >/= 1 week will be accepted
Training is MANDATORY (although I've gotten out of it before)
I suspect there probably is a similar requirement for DECworld, but
when you're stretched for good people, the rules are more "flexible"
|
1874.76 | Not to rain on the parade but... | ACOSTA::MIANO | John - NY Retail Banking Resource Cntr | Thu May 21 1992 21:32 | 24 |
| I don't want to sound too negative but I think that after we spend as
much money as we did on DECworld that some intensive soul searching
ought to be done. In other words their should be an comprehensive
QUALITATIVE analysis. Having N quotes from customers on how great it
was is only anecdotal evidence. If a large number of those customers
don't go back and increase their buying from us then DECworld was a
waste of money...if they do then it was all worth while.
Unfortunately the only evaluations I have heard and expect to hear on
DECworld are the automatic rah-rah-rahs. Everyone involved with putting
together DECworld - the highest to the lowest levels - proclaim DECworld
was a tremendous success.
If I were the president of Digital I would order two studies: One tell
say why DECworld was a success and another to tell why it was a failure.
Then I'd try to judge which was true and then decide:
1) If we should continue to do DECworlds
2) If the format or scope should be changed
DECworld looks like it was a tactical success. Let's see if it was a
strategic one as well.
John
|
1874.77 | market for results | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Fri May 22 1992 08:42 | 2 |
| In fact, the level of intense measurement called for in -1 is indeed
going on. It was underway during DECWorld and is ongoing.
|
1874.78 | This will be a first? | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Mon May 25 1992 12:42 | 3 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
Brilliant. We should do it for all major expenditures.
|
1874.79 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed Jun 10 1992 15:15 | 6 |
| Does somebody have a pointer to where I can get the DECworld
expense account rules for housing?
I'v been told that up to $99/night was approved for DECworld attendees?
What about room expenses for those who couldn't get the $99/night
rooms? How do I get an exception?
|
1874.80 | A Start...? | JOKUR::JOKUR::BOICE | When in doubt, do it. | Wed Jun 10 1992 15:42 | 6 |
| > Does somebody have a pointer to where I can get the DECworld
> expense account rules for housing?
VTX DECWORLD has some information regarding lodging with Q&A's.
- Jim
|
1874.81 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed Jun 10 1992 17:31 | 6 |
| I have been sent VAXmail with the answer I needed. Thanks.
The problem sees to be that the officially approved lodging rates are
higher than petty cash's normal amounts, and nobody told petty cash to
accept the larger amounts. Therefore EVERY expense voucher requires a
cc-signed explanation letter.
|
1874.82 | | ASICS::LESLIE | [email protected] | Thu Jun 11 1992 05:28 | 1 |
| Waste a tree! You know it makes sense,
|