T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
441.1 | New or additional? | LSTARK::THOMPSON | Famous Ex-Noter | Mon Jan 18 1988 10:35 | 13 |
| The obvious question is would this be an additional holiday or would
it replace one of the ones we already have? If the latter, which
holiday?
An additional holiday would cost a lot of money of course. Replacing
Patriots Day (location choice day) would not cost as much. I think
that taking peoples personal day away would not go over too well.
I doubt you'll see this happen except as a replacement for Patriots
Day. Personally, while I have great respect for MLK, there are others
more deserving of a holiday in their honor who I'd like to see honored
first.
Alfred
|
441.2 | | MAPLE::BRAKE | By the Time I Get to Phoenix... | Mon Jan 18 1988 11:00 | 16 |
| There is only 1 day per year (2 depending on the day it occurs)
that Digital honors a person with a holiday. Jesus' birthday is
the only one so honored.
Other contributors to Armerican history are not so honored; George
Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Susan Anthony, Claire Booth Luce, Thomas
Jefferson to name a few.
We celebrate events rather than individuals. The spirit of Martin
Luther King Jr is, I believe, a thing that deserves consideration.
However, individual recognition is not in the spirit of the themes
of Valuing Differences, as I see it.
Rich
|
441.3 | Don't believe the purpose is to honor MLK | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Mon Jan 18 1988 11:16 | 4 |
| Does anyone seriously think that Martin Luther King day honors the
person rather than the ideals and struggles the person exemplified?
/s/ Jim Williams
|
441.4 | Let's not get off on a tangent | LSTARK::THOMPSON | Famous Ex-Noter | Mon Jan 18 1988 11:34 | 10 |
| RE: .2 & .3
Person or event or struggle there are still people whose contributions
to the US, to mankind, to peace who are more deserving of recognition.
This is not SOAPBOX to argue every little nit of wording.
The big issue is should there be a replacement or an additional
holiday? If so, which? After that, to honor who (or whose work)?
Alfred
|
441.5 | Make a Day of It | DELNI::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Mon Jan 18 1988 12:20 | 12 |
| From a practical standpoint, adding a new holiday, especially one
so close to the existing Christmas/New Year cluster, would be
difficult.
I think it would be more practical, and more appropriate, to set
aside MLK Day as a corporate-wide Valuing the Difference Day. We
could have presentations on the topic on that day, instead of spread
throughout the year.
Of course, if "valuing differences" is just a fad, it might not
be foresightful to plan activities into the indefinite future...
(sound of gauntlet dropping ----^)
|
441.6 | "Location/Plant Choice" Holiday - Some Do Celebrate MLK Day | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal, MLO6-1/U30, 223-7687 | Mon Jan 18 1988 13:19 | 24 |
| FYI: DEC has 1 "Location/Plant Choice" Holiday per year. Boston
and Springfield, MA both use MLK Day as their "Location/Plant
Choice" Holiday, whereas the Greater Maynard Area uses Patriot's Day
(April 18th for '88) as their "Location/Plant Choice" Holiday.
Therefore, it is up to Plant Management to choose a suitable holiday
for this purpose. BTW: Boston & Springfield were celebrating MLK
Day as a Holiday for a number of years now, a lot earlier than it
was declared a Fed Holiday.
I don't see DEC as being benevolent enough (at this point) to add a
new holiday. [If you doubt this, look at the raises/range increases
for the past few years! The current "bean-counters" are making the
bottom line look good, giving hefty increases to the executives, but
poor raises to the "working class", thus they are very unlikely to
spend megabucks to celebrate a new holiday!] The answer you would
probably get is that you can use your "Personal Holiday" to
celebrate MLK Day if you wish!
If people feel strongly about it, they can always pursue the issue
with their Plant Manager and get consideration for changing the
"Location/Plant Holiday" to MLK Day.
Good Luck!
|
441.7 | Go with 'home' rule | TLE::SAVAGE | Neil, @Spit Brook | Mon Jan 18 1988 13:37 | 3 |
| Len Segal in .6 has the solution: have the individual sites choose
their facility day. If my site (ZKO, which currently has no selection)
chooses MLK's B-day, that's fine with me.
|
441.8 | No, liberate all the holidays! | MINAR::BISHOP | | Mon Jan 18 1988 17:40 | 12 |
| No, it's not fine with me.
Please do not remove the element of personal choice from yet another
holiday. It is very convenient to have what is effectively two
"personal choice" days at ZK, and if you value my differences from
other people in when I want time off, don't force me to have one
of them on the 18th of January.
Personally, I think _all_ paid holidays should be movable, as
vacation days are.
-John Bishop
|
441.9 | Is a holiday the right thing? | SMURF::REEVES | Jon Reeves, ULTRIX compiler group | Mon Jan 18 1988 18:13 | 6 |
| .5 briefly raised an excellent point: would it not honor Dr. King
more to have appropriate activities (several, in fact, did take
place at ZKO this year) than to simply have another day off? For
comparison, how many people truly reflect on the meanings of Memorial
Day, Independence Day, or Labor Day during their day off? I'd bet
not too many.
|
441.10 | Here's one reason why DEC does not do MLKjr Day | REGENT::WOLF | | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:25 | 6 |
| One item that has not surfaced in this note that is relevent is
that MLKjr day is NOT recognized as a national holdiay in NH. NH
is one of 12 states that do not recognize it.
|
441.11 | Just my opinion... | MISFIT::DEEP | | Tue Jan 19 1988 10:10 | 16 |
|
Another vote for scrapping the whole idea. I like to take my personal holiday
when I want to...not when I'm told to... That's the whole idea of "personal."
Adding an additional holiday is unlikely to happen, and if it did, I agree with
previous notes that there are other people equally deserving of the honor.
We don't honor many of our countries greatest contributors b-days... why should
we honor MLKjr's?
The whole idea seems a little bigoted, and I think Dr. King would probably be
appalled to think that he was chosen over the likes of George Washington,
Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, etc...
|
441.12 | Say What? | DELNI::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Tue Jan 19 1988 16:30 | 6 |
| [Re: .11]: Frankly, there is something doubleplus ungood about
the use of the word "bigoted" in the previous reply. If Dr. King's
memory is honored to the same degree as that of Washington and Lincoln
today, that would be fine. King brought dignity to many millions
more people than Washington, and he helped finish the work Lincoln
started.
|
441.13 | Can we afford it? | SAHQ::LUBER | The burning question: what's for dinner? | Tue Jan 19 1988 17:37 | 2 |
| Can we afford another holiday? We are already far behind our global
competitors in productivity.
|
441.14 | | DELNI::SILK | serving time | Tue Jan 19 1988 19:57 | 22 |
|
What if it weren't a paid holiday, but some kind of celebration? Right
now, in our area, I think all that happens is a breakfast somewhere
else. I'd love to see some sort of voluntary event at my site! Even
just a photo exhibit or something.
Of all the national days, Martin Luther King's birthday probably
moves me the most. I feel sad at not having a more public outlet
than my own home for commemorating it. I'd certainly attend, maybe
even get involved in planning.
As for the fact that we don't celebrate every important person's birth,
that's true, but many of us have a much closer relationship one way or
the other with the issues that Martin Luther King was dealing with than
the issues that, say, George Washington dealt with--not to knock George
of course-- but King was MY contemporary--he changed MY world! I still
can't hear his voice and words without getting a lump in my throat.
I'm not sure that "valuing differences" is the idea at all--in fact,
I think King's ideas were more about "valuing similarities."
Nina
|
441.15 | No, not another holiday!! | SEINE::RAINVILLE | The best view is close to the edge! | Tue Jan 19 1988 22:14 | 17 |
| I would much prefer to abolish some of the existing holidays, I
think there are far too many as it is. As an example, it is very
difficult to get things done around the christmas season as the
days before we take off for chrismas and new year's are totally
unproductive. This results in manufacturing organizations
cramming work into the early part of the month with the attendant
screw-ups, oversights and poor quality. I've always felt that
christmas was something forced down my throat whether i want it
or not, i don't want another such. I am also apalled at the
hype attending christmas spending, it really turns me off and
dilutes the message of hope and salvation. I don't think it
is appropriate for business and goverenment to observe religious
holidays, but I accept that this nation was founded by refugees
from religious persecution, so the over-reaction is understandable.
Mike_the_quality_engineer_who_cleans_up_after_managment_slobs
|
441.16 | holiday count | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Wed Jan 20 1988 08:40 | 11 |
| re: .13
Oh, no, not the productivity ploy!
You might find it interesting to compare the public holiday and
mandated vacation days in any of your standard Western Democracies,
except USA, them come back and babble about competeing with others.
/s/ Jim Williams
(sorry if I sound a little harse)
|
441.17 | | DCC::JAERVINEN | He's overpaid, but he's worth it. | Wed Jan 20 1988 09:30 | 3 |
|
14 (fourteen) in Germany (though some may fall on a Saturday/Sunday).
|
441.18 | my $.02 | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Wed Jan 20 1988 10:57 | 5 |
| re .0 I had monday off - Springfield Plant choice holiday. cold
rainy day in january. On Patriots Day I will call in sick and go
fishing with a friend from another plant. As it stands, we get no
holiday from Jan. 18 to May 30. 4 1/2 months. Does this make any
sense ?
|
441.19 | | ULTRA::HERBISON | Less functionality, more features | Wed Jan 20 1988 13:40 | 19 |
| Re: .18
> Patriots Day I will call in sick and go
> fishing with a friend from another plant.
This is lying to your manager and stealing from DEC. I'm
surprised that you are willing to mention doing this in a
public conference. If you want to take the day off then
take a vacation day.
> As it stands, we get no
> holiday from Jan. 18 to May 30. 4 1/2 months. Does this make any
> sense ?
Yes, since all of the other DEC holidays are outside of that
time period. If you want to take time off between those dates
then use your personal holiday or take a vacation day.
B.J.
|
441.20 | A "public" conference? | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney DTN 352.2157 | Wed Jan 20 1988 20:47 | 4 |
| Please refrain from calling proprietary information or private property
of Digital Equipment Corporation "public". When you mean "limited to
the use of Digital employees" use those words. Use "public" specifically
to refer to things in which Digital has no ownership interest.
|
441.21 | just asking... | DONNIE::MOSER | Time to trot, Frito!! | Wed Jan 20 1988 21:01 | 9 |
| Question:
What is "patriots day"?? Perhaps commemorating the ill fated trip to the
super bowl!?!?
*snicker*
(honestly, I've never heard of it)
|
441.22 | Time to take a history refresher I guess | MEMORY::CASSIDY | Do, or do not. There is no try. | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:06 | 9 |
| It commemerates the confrontation between the Massachusetts colonists
and British soldiers in Lexington and Concord, the start of the
Revolutionary War.
The poet called it "the shot heard 'round the world".
It rates right up there with 'Evacuation Day', the day Howe and
crew left Boston. Great holiday, since it falls on St. Patrick's
Day.
|
441.23 | revising the calendar | GRACKL::RATHMELL | Jack Rathmell DTN 226-2655 N123TX | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:15 | 8 |
|
< It rates right up there with 'Evacuation Day', the day Howe and
< crew left Boston. Great holiday, since it falls on St. Patrick's
< Day.
St Patrick's Day is March 17, Patriot's Day is April 19.
|
441.24 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:01 | 7 |
| >< It rates right up there with 'Evacuation Day', the day Howe and
>< crew left Boston. Great holiday, since it falls on St. Patrick's
>< Day.
>St Patrick's Day is March 17, Patriot's Day is April 19.
It's Evacuation Day that falls on St. Patrick's day.
|
441.25 | On the Other Hand... | UCOUNT::BAILEY | Corporate Sleuth | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:40 | 40 |
| I'm just a no 'count contractor, so I don't get ANY holidays, but
here's my opinion anyhow!
It seems to me that the original intent of all the holidays was
to free people who celebrate them from work so they COULD celebrate
them. One place I used to work in Michigan gave Christians Christmas
off and Jews took Hanukkah. (Everybody else usually took Christmas,
out of tradition.) You got Good Friday afternoon ONLY if you were
going to church.
Vets seem to be the only ones very much interested in the intent
of Memorial Day, and I guess the AFL-CIO might do something on Labor
Day...I never noticed.
My point is that nearly all of us now take holidays for granted
as paid days off without much other meaning. My suggestion is to
reconsider what that time is for in the real world as well as in
the ideal. I don't think it makes sense for employees to forfeit
what has become a standard benefit, but I also don't see that a
corporation should have to pay for increasing numbers of unpaid
work days.
One suggestion I have considered is that instead of celebrating
holidays by having days off at work, that we do something at work
(an hour of presentations plus displays, perhaps) to celebrate ANY
important holiday, declared or otherwise. Then, to make up for
the time off, maybe we could have one long weekend every other month
or something to spread "holidays" out to be the "R & R" most of us
really need! These could be adjusted or combined with the holidays
we really do take off in the proper spirit...Independence Day and
Thanksgiving, for example.
Meanwhile, for all of you who get upset over these things, just
remember your poor unfortunate collegues who are paid hourly and
get NO paid time off, for vacation, sickness (real or pretend),
OR holidays (chosen or mandatory.) ;^) ...(sigh)
And have a happy ... whatever!
Sherry
|
441.26 | | EVER11::KRUPINSKI | No personal name | Thu Jan 21 1988 12:33 | 28 |
| I have posted in my office a calendar entitled "Digital 1988
US Holiday Schedule" which lists both December 23 and December 26
as US holidays in 1988. If we wished to celebrate MLK's birthday,
we could shift one of those days, thereby solving the "do we add
another vacation day, use a location choice or personal choice
holiday, or not celebrate some other holiday" problem.
However, I agree with the earlier respondents who observed that
there are other Americans who are more deserving of being
remembered with a holiday.
I also agree with the earlier respondents who stated that all
holidays should be personal choice. Personally, I'd be in favor
of the following four holidays being observed nationally, because they
have national meaning, and are non-sectarian:
July 4 Signing of the Declaration of Independence
Memorial Day Tribute to those who gave their life in
service to the country
Veteran's Day Tribute to those who served in the Nation's
Armed Forces
Thanksgiving National day of Thanksgiving
Then leave the balance of holidays to be observed by those for
whom the holiday has meaning.
Tom_K
|
441.27 | | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | Storybook ending in progress | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:41 | 6 |
| Since NIO (and most of NH I think) has no location choice day, we get to
choose our own. Personally, I want to keep it that way. I would rather
pick my own day than HAVE to take yet another holiday during this time
of year, even tho' MLK's and my birthday fall on the same day.
Jenna
|
441.28 | I thought the Dec 23 day was a poor choice | HPSCAD::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller, MRO1-1, 297-4160 | Thu Jan 21 1988 15:54 | 3 |
| Probably off the subject but I wish they would give us off Dec 27
instead of Dec 23 so that one could take 3 vacation days and get
a whole week off.
|
441.29 | Personal choice days, rah! | DELNI::SILK | serving time | Thu Jan 21 1988 20:47 | 9 |
| Why have a location day at all? Why not just have another personal
choice day?
It's not like we all go off and have a picnic together or whatever
on the site holiday--what's the relationship between the site and
the holiday? Feels like someone "up there" is just making another
arbitrary decision that I could well make myself.
Nina
|
441.30 | A Day Off Far Every Holiday | MOHAWK::CLARK | | Fri Jan 22 1988 09:55 | 19 |
|
I think all the holidays should be recognized with a day off.
New Years Martin Luther King Abraham Lincoln
Valentine's George Washington Ash Wednesday
St. Patrick's Palm Sunday Patriots
Passover Good Friday Easter
Mothers day Armed Forces Memorial
Flag Fathers day Canada Day
Independence Labor Rosh Hashanah
Yom Kipper Columbus United Nations
Halloween Election Day Veterans
Thanksgiving Hanukkah Christmas
A whole month of holidays, those that fall on a weekend can be observed
on the following monday, those during the week on the preceding
monday. Did I leave any out? There must be about 335 more I didn't
think of.
|
441.31 | On Holidays | DELNI::JONG | Steve Jong/NaC Pubs | Fri Jan 22 1988 10:59 | 22 |
| Just because Digital (and many other corporations) give their employees
eleven paid holidays or so, doesn't mean there are only a dozen
holidays. I was reminded of this when I got home last night and
saw the uncollected garbage on our street. The garbage collectors
didn't pick it up because they're on a holiday week schedule. I
didn't get my mail on Monday, either. My son wasn't in school Monday.
How many holidays a company grants is strictly a labor/management
agreement. It's not "right" or "wrong" to have more (or less).
I know that Ford Motor employees have had a truly staggering number
of holidays in their contract, upwards of *forty*, that virtually
gives them a four-day work week. What that has done to their
productivity I needn't mention, but the compensation world does
not revolve around what high-tech does.
By the way, a respondent suggested that ten holidays was somehow
wasteful, and that our productivity was sagging because of it.
Perhaps I missed a smiley face buried in the note; but I do think
I caught a faint odor of burning insulation, as if that poor noter's
circuits were quietly frying. I think someone should post a few
studies noting the relationship between "24 x 7" work habits and
burnout.
|
441.32 | Lots of possible holidays | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:17 | 18 |
| Maybe this nit is adding fuel to the flames, but Hanukkah is not
one of the Jewish holidays when a Jew is not supposed to work and
is supposed to spend the whole day in prayer with the congregation
- it is a very minor holiday, and even the most observant people
(I am a liberal, myslef) work during it. I'd rather get Yom Kippur,
Rosh Hashanah (which is 2 days, unless you're in Israel), the first
two days of Passover, and the first days of Shavuot and Sukkot -
and the really strict people (like some of my relatives) would take
the first two days of Shavuot and Sukkot, and the last day of them
as well as the last day of Passover, and all the minor fast days
- as it is, I use five days of vacation time in order to join my
congregation at prayer, less whichever of them already fall on a
weekend. Not so bad now that I get lots of vacation time (I've worked
here for more than 12 years), but tough when I only got ten days
to begin with - a person needs a "vacation" after a while, and spending
the whole day in schul praying isn't hardly a vacation.
|
441.33 | Everybody wins... | EMASS::BARNETTE | Good to Go! | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:28 | 23 |
|
What if (to borrow a phrase from HP) we changed the "location
choice" day to an "employee choice" day? That way, the progressive
thinkers could take MLK day off, and on Patriots day they could
come into the office for a workday free of the odious presence
of the far-right-wingers and superpatriots, who of course would
choose that day for their holiday!
&*)
But, seriously, DEC would enjoy productivity for *both* days,
and the employees would have the ability to choose, perhaps
even alternate year-to-year.
I support the MLK holiday, but would not want my position
forced upon others whose social views differ from mine.
In any case, January in New England is a rather bleak time
for a holiday. The skies are gray, the roads are gray, the
cars are gray, even the people turn a little gray. It's cold
and there isn't much to do. Persons with no particular preference
for either day would probably prefer the April holiday, and
choose accordingly.
{Neal}
|
441.34 | I Like LONG Vacations | HPSCAD::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller, MRO1-1, 297-4160 | Fri Jan 22 1988 15:10 | 5 |
| Do away with the all the holidays and give them to us a vacation
days. Since you can accumulate 2x your vacation time by saving
up one could get LONG vacations. Lets see, every 2 years I could
take the whole summer off (* 2 (+ 5_vac_wks 2_holiday_wks)). Now
that sounds like FUN!
|
441.35 | Why have official holidays? | ULTRA::OFSEVIT | | Fri Jan 22 1988 16:21 | 21 |
| .29> Why have a location day at all? Why not just have another
.29> personal choice day?
For the same reason we work Monday through Friday and get Saturday
and Sunday off. It saves the company money to know that a facility
is officially closed for a day. If a day isn't an official holiday,
then it has to be treated as an ordinary weekday, when the following
have to be provided at a facility:
o Full power and lighting
o Secretarial, clerical, personnel, and other support staff
o Cafeteria
o Shipping/receiving
o Full security instead of skeleton staff
o Many more you can probably think of
In the specific example, Patriots' Day, enough people would take
the day off anyway that it is in Digital's interest to declare it
a holiday at most Massachusetts sites.
David
|
441.36 | Lest we forget | DENTON::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Sat Jan 23 1988 12:49 | 9 |
| Re .30:
Don't forget Arbor Day.
Re .33:
Is sliming people who take Patriot's Day off a component of Digital's Valuing
Differences policy?
/AHM
|
441.37 | Is it time to chill out, yet? | IOSG::VICKERSD | Loving it in Old England | Sat Jan 23 1988 16:52 | 14 |
| Re: .36 flaming at .33
It sure appeared that the author of .33 made it quite clear that
his comments were facetious. I sure value YOUR differences and
maybe even his. It's all those other people out there that I can't
stand.
It seems like valuing differences could be achieved with less pain.
I suggest that we all work on working together and stay happy.
But then I'm known for being weird,
Don
|
441.38 | Line noise ("&*)") makes all things right | DENTON::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Sat Jan 23 1988 18:14 | 4 |
| Re .37:
I guess it wasn't quite so clear then, was it?
/AHM/SIGH
|
441.40 | DEC U.S. has *ten* paid holidays per calendar year | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Sun Jan 24 1988 19:55 | 20 |
| Fact: MLK day is a Federal holiday.
Fact: DEC does not observe all Federal holidays. DEC does not observe MLK day,
President's Day, Columbus Day, or Veteran's Day. DEC observes all other
Federal holidays and provides four additional holidays, two assigned on
a corporate basis (the day after Thanksgiving and one additional day at
Christmas or New Year's), one assigned by location or given as a personal
day, and one personal day.
Discussing whether DEC should observe MLK day instead of or in addition to one
of the existing holidays is a valid topic for this conference.
Some discussion of the relative social importance of Dr. King and the others
who are or are not honored by DEC is possible as well, but only if directly
relating to DEC and its holidays.
Most of this discussion belongs in Soapbox, not here. Unless it directly
relates to a discussion of DEC holidays, it will be hidden, as I have done with
Maggie's note, to allow the poster to put the note into Soapbox.
/john
|
441.41 | No slime intended. Sorry! | EMASS::BARNETTE | Good to Go! | Mon Jan 25 1988 09:55 | 12 |
|
Too bad note .39 is set hidden. It must have been a doozy!
Regarding .37, the ( &*) ) is my representation of
a smile and a wink (&). Also, the asterisk looks more like
my schnoz than does the caret (^). My references to the
kind of people who would choose Patriots day over MLK day
were intended as a playful poke at some of the more reactionary
contributors to these notes conferences, like the Great Bear,
for instance. Sorry if I poked too hard!
{Neal}
|
441.42 | Set hidden by moderator | RAINBO::TARBET | | Mon Jan 25 1988 22:24 | 9 |
441.44 | Let's stay in the bounds of the conference | IOSG::VICKERSD | Loving it in Old England | Tue Jan 26 1988 04:19 | 23 |
| I concur with the moderator actions in this case. This is NOT soapbox
and this conference should not be used to discuss the relative merits
of people who do or do not have holidays in their honour. Maggie's
note was fairly innocuous as she says but it didn't deal at all
with Digital and only discussed MLK and his contributions to the
plight of a large segment of the population of the USA. It was
a good note but not for here, in my opinion.
I have reread note .26 and believe it to be a good note, other than one
paragraph saying that others deserve holidays more than MLK. It offers
a good idea of having 'generic' holidays for Digital. These person
specific holidays seem to cause more pain and flames than they do to
honour the memory and accomplishments of the people after which they
are named.
Clearly, it's very hard to not get emotional on a subject like this
one as the activity level shows. I hate to add to the noise level
but wish to point out that we should try harder to understand each
other so that we can work and thrive together.
Keep the faiths,
Don
|
441.45 | Re-Direction of Topic | BUSY::KLEINBERGER | Vivo, ergo sum | Tue Jan 26 1988 07:09 | 26 |
| RE: .42 and .43
These replies to this topic were set hidden by me. Once again, if
you have material that is better slated to BETHE::SOAPBOX, there
is a topic in that conference to address those issues.
If you question why any of the moderators have done something, please
send mail to that moderator. John Covert explained himself very
well, however if a followup was needed, it would have been provided.
Also, the two hidden replies refered to a reply in this topic that
was deleted, I'd rather have this topic stay within what requested:
Discussing whether DEC should observe MLK day instead of or in
addition to one of the existing holidays is a valid topic for this
conference.
Some discussion of the relative social importance of Dr. King and the others
who are or are not honored by DEC is possible as well, but only if directly
relating to DEC and its holidays.
If you have any other questions, please refer to reply .40 of this
topic.
Gale
|
441.46 | On sober reflection... | EMASS::BARNETTE | Blue Note | Sat Jan 30 1988 08:51 | 19 |
|
First of all, I guess the idea of an employee-choice
is pretty goofy, when you look a t it from the administrative
side. (it's not my first goofy idea, either!) If only three
persons were going to take one day and the rest of the world
another, it wouldn't be worth opening up the factory or office
or whatever.
If there is a policy or implicit policy against having a
holiday in a person's honor, (except religious holidays)
then it's understandable that MLK day would come under that
policy.
I kinda feel responsible for a lot of the acrimony that has
stirred up in this topic. Guess I've been reading soapbox
too much. To everyone I've upset, I apologize.
{Neal}
|