T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1086.1 | an alternative with less drag | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:58 | 9 |
| Instead of a cage, how about one of the line cutters that fits on the
propeller (moving blade) and on the shaft strut (fixed blade)? They are
stainless steel, however. A propeller cage would, I suspect,
considerably reduce sailing performance, especially in light winds.
Does anyone have any personal experience with these line cutters? I am
considering adding one to my boat to reduce the hazard of lobster pot
warps.
|
1086.2 | | ABE::HASKELL | | Tue Jan 03 1989 15:28 | 16 |
| Line cutters may be alright for some, but not in my case for two
reasons; 1) I don't have room on the shaft to install spurs, 2)
I have too much respect for those who try to making a hard living
from the sea to use a method thta would damage their equipment.
You see, Cape Porpoise is a working harbor of some 50 -60
lobster/fishing boats and only 10 or 12 pleasure boats.
Yes, a cage will reduce my speed by .25 knots. This is not a great
deal Alan. It is something I can live with. In light airs, if I
can't really make much headway, then I'll have to start up the iron
sail.
Thanks
Paul
|
1086.3 | | ASABET::HO | | Tue Jan 03 1989 16:29 | 7 |
|
Some of the lobstermen may have cages fitted on their own boats.
Maybe one of them can tell you were they had it done. Try checking
out the boatyards near Cape Porpoise who service the lobster boats.
- gene
|
1086.4 | yes, but ..... | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Jan 03 1989 17:09 | 30 |
| re .2:
>>> I have too much respect for those who try to making a hard living
>>> from the sea to use a method thta would damage their equipment.
I agree with you philosophically, but ..... practically, I would prefer
to minimize the risk of losing my boat due to lobster pot warps, etc. I
used to think that being careful to avoid pot warps was enough. Not any
more. Last September we were reanchoring around midnight to avoid a lee
shore (major wind shift) and backed over two warps which tangled around
the propeller hard enough to pull the shaft from the transmission
coupling. Fortunately, by this time the anchor had set, but we still
spent an extremely nervous night worrying about the nearby ledges
knowing we had little chance of avoiding a catastrophe if the anchor
dragged.
Some of the lobstermen are really quite thoughtless in how they set
their traps. I really don't see why some Maine lobstermen think a 50 to
100 foot toggle line is needed from the main bouy to the little bouy
(usually virtually invisible) on the main pot warp. A much shorter
toggle would be adequate and much safer for everyone. Cape Porpoise is a
nice harbor (we've sheltered there several times), but the lobster pot
bouys make the entrance non-navigable as far as I'm concerned. I won't
go there again except in desperation. In general, I'd like to see
lobstering banned inside harbor limits and in harbor entrances. I doubt
it would reduce the total lobster catch one whit. (According to the new
Maine cruising guide, the total lobster catch in Maine has stayed the
same over the last 50 to 60 years in spite of a 10-fold increase in the
number of traps.)
|
1086.5 | I am fitting a cutter to the prop.... | CHEFS::GOUGHP | Pete Gough @REO 830-6603 | Wed Jan 04 1989 03:10 | 25 |
| I am about to fit spurs to CIRCE. Last season we fouled 8 times......
The rationale is that the amount of debris in the waters of the English
Channel make it worth while. Thats the rationale the real reason
was after one fouling last summer. We had sailed a 20 hour overnight
passage across the English Channel to Alderney and the wind dropped
so being 2 miles off Alderney we decided to motor in. We headed for
the harbour and fouled badly. Luckily the wind got up again but
it took us several hours to sail into harbour and pick up a bouy.
It took two divers off a neighbouring Tri 20 minutes with tanks
on to clear the prop, all for the price of a bottle of Wine.
Alderney is very rocky and at Springs the tide can run at 6 knts,
we were at Neaps so all we had to sail against was 4 knts. Needless
to say I was on the radio to Alderney Harbour to keep an eye on
us........ Many of the fishermen are laying their pots and badly
marking them in navigable channels. The advice to fit spurs came
from a fisherman......who believes that badly marked pots are a
menace to all.
I also don't have room to fit the Spurs between P Bracket and prop
but the kit comes with a Spacer to resolve the problem. Cost on
my 28 footer is 190 pounds stirling.
Pete
|
1086.6 | A conservation measure?? | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Wed Jan 04 1989 09:19 | 16 |
| It's illegal to obstruct a marked channel, and where otherwise
posted (i.e., certain specified anchorages), by anchoring your boat or a
surface buoy. It doesn't take any special skill or talent for anyone,
including fishermen, to learn what the law is. I respect most fishermen
of all types, but those lobstermen who violate the law for their own
convenience and substantially interfere with others -- or worse yet -- put
them in danger, deserve to face the "inconvenience" of losing some traps.
Outside marked channels, I will respect their property and give much extra
effort to save their gear if I tangle in it.
J.
(Maybe these propshaft cutters are what the fisheries conservationists
should sponsor as the way to preserve the population of Homarus Americanus!)
|
1086.7 | | LDYBUG::FACHON | | Wed Jan 04 1989 10:38 | 19 |
| Re base note and follow-up
It sounds like you already give due respect to the lobster"persons"
of Cape Porpoise. Adding a cage may in fact make things
worse. If you add a cage, I'd guess your speed would
suffer a LOT more than .25 knots. I've never seen statistics,
but any cage that can sufficiently protect against fouling would,
I suspect, slow you the better part of a knot in all but the
most blustery conditions. So you'll be motoring in and out much
more often. If you take any pleasure in the seamanship required
to handle a boat exclusively under sail, this would become intolerable.
I really think you can find a "knife" that will fit. I'd continue with
your old practice and be content in knowing you've done your
best to respect the rights of others while preserving your
rights as well.
Dean
|
1086.8 | | GONAVY::GINGER | | Thu Jan 05 1989 08:30 | 13 |
| Any info on the relative efficiency of the two options?
Id guess there are many ways a line could foul a prop- like around
a blade- that would not be cut away by a shaft mounted cutter. On
the other hand, I see little way a line could get inside a reasonable
cage.
The cages Ive seen have been made of about 3/8-1/2" dia rod. I cant
believe this would create much drag, certaily not enough to kill
a knot off top speed.
Id go for the cage.
|
1086.9 | If you must, try a shroud | 4GL::FANEUF | | Thu Jan 05 1989 11:48 | 17 |
| Sorry, Ron, but I have to disagree. A prop cage is almost perfectly designed
to produce the maximum drag for the least amount of material. Here you have
a collection of round rods (a cylinder produces more drag than any other smooth
shape, it approaces a flat plate) welded into a lattice that guarantees lots
of interfering vortices to generate turbulence and suck up energy. I would
expect a cage to produce as much drag as a fixed-blade prop or even more.
A knot off top speed wouldn't surprise me at all.
As a compromise, you could see if someone could manufacture a shroud for
your propeller. This is a ring which has an approximate airfoil cross-section,
and which fits around the outside of your propeller with maybe 1/4 to 1/2 inch
clearance. It would be more expensive to make, but produce much less drag and
be almost as good keeping line out. The bonus would be some increased
thrust from your prop. both forward and reverse.
Ross Faneuf
|
1086.10 | | CHEFS::GOUGHP | Pete Gough @REO 830-6603 | Thu Jan 05 1989 12:29 | 15 |
| Before deciding to go the cutter route I had a long chat with a
firm of very reputable Marine Engineers ie they do work for our
MOD as well as civvy boat owners. They favour the cutter because
of the diverse rubbish you need to protect against ie sheets of
polythene, polythene bags ala supermarket, japanese weed, pots,
etc. They also believed that a cutter would cost me .25-.5 knt but
a cage would be 1.25-1.5knt. Of the 8 fouled props last year 2 were
in a navigable and crowded channel, 3 were sheets of polythene just
below the surface.....,2 were Japanese weed, 1 was someone elses
warp that was left trailing behind their motor yacht (They did offer
to go over the side to free it, I readily accepted.....).
Hence I am fitting a cutter.
Pete
|
1086.11 | PRICE | ABE::HASKELL | | Thu Jan 05 1989 12:50 | 6 |
| What are the prices for the cutters?
thanks
Paul
|
1086.12 | Kort nozzles | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Thu Jan 05 1989 13:31 | 26 |
| RE: .9,
>>> As a compromise, you could see if someone could manufacture a shroud
>>> for your propeller. This is a ring which has an approximate airfoil
>>> cross-section, and which fits around the outside of your propeller with
>>> maybe 1/4 to 1/2 inch clearance.
I've seen a similar type of thing fitted to some fishing boats, especially
further south; it's apparently call a Kort nozzle. They use it primarily
because is increases the thrust dramatically at lower boat speeds, as when
dragging or towing nets.
One problem lies in how efficient your propeller is relative to moving
your hull; if it moves a large volume of water with relatively less motion
of hull, then you'll find lines can be sucked into the blades from a
distance outside the expected path of incidence.
If you're set on a cage, consider a very simple one: only three, four or
five rods in front of the prop instead of the full cage you often see on
lobster boats. Remember, they're moving forward and back at all speeds
while turning amidst many lines. And they tend to operate like a dragster
-- full throttle or idling out of gear -- so the likelihood of sucking in
a line from a short distance away may be greater.
J.
|
1086.13 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Jan 05 1989 13:37 | 7 |
| re .11:
The Spurs line cutter prices vary with shaft size. I don't have the
current price list, but a cutter for a 1" shaft is about $200 to $250.
H&H Propeller in Salem, MA, sells them.
|
1086.14 | There Is Hope | ABE::HASKELL | | Wed Jan 04 1989 11:16 | 18 |
| Just as a follow-up to my base note.
Last year, the Coast Guard took two patrol boats (44 footers) and
strung a cable between them. they then entered the main channel
and harbor of Cape Porpoise and swept the channel on two different
dates. The went up to one of the islands in the harbor and dropped
all the pots and buoys they had removed and told the lobstermen
to go ahead and look for their equipment but to keep them out of
the channel and harbor or they (CG) would be back.
The lobstermen didn't, the Coast Guard did. By September and October,
the channel was in pretty good shape with only a few buoys where
they shouldn't have been.
I wonder what they will do this coming season?
Paul
|
1086.15 | Where's the Harbormaster? | CDR::SPENCER | John Spencer | Wed Jan 04 1989 12:03 | 7 |
| Doesn't Cape Porpoise have a Harbormaster? If so, does s/he have *any*
teeth at all? In Rockport, MA the Hbrmstr pulls traps in the channel on a
regular basis (where they wander over the line marking the channel limit.)
State law protects him from damage liability in doing so.
J.
|
1086.16 | | ABE::HASKELL | | Wed Jan 04 1989 13:00 | 11 |
| Cape Porpoise does have a Harbor Master. He is a Deputy of the Harbor
Master of Kenneybunkport. The Cape Porpoise Harbor Master's main
job is running the Cape Porpoise Fishermens Co-Operative.
Although he is a fine person, you can't expect him to pull traps
of those that are where they shouldn't be. In other words. One dosen't
bite the hand that feeds you. He is hired (appointed) by the members
of the co-operative.
aul
|
1086.17 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Jan 05 1989 12:27 | 9 |
| The CG probably has enough teeth.
Lobstermen in Mass and probably elsewhere are frequently armed and
dangerous, i.e., shoot first and ask questions later if they see
anyone touch their traps. Enough so to scare off a lot of harbormasters.
If I ran afoul of a lobster trap line, I'd leave the boat there
and buy a new one :-)
|
1086.18 | Shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out | AKOV12::DJOHNSTON | | Thu Jan 05 1989 12:56 | 9 |
| Maybe I'm insensitive to others source of income, but I routinely
cut the floats off of any traps that end up with the float bouncing
up against my hull while at the mooring. I just don't have the
thousands of dollars to repaint my hull every year. Traps don't
belong in the harbors, nor in channels. Plus, you hardly ever hear
of people being killed by these guys anymore :^).
Dave
|
1086.19 | cut & dri | VLNVAX::FRENIERE | | Thu Jan 19 1989 16:37 | 10 |
| There is some commercial lobestering goin on in Newport (RI) harbor in
the anchorage area and over towards the Admirals dock. Last year an
acquaintence of mine anchored on two hooks with line. He found that
a lobsterman had cut one of the rhodes to retrieve a pot that had
gotten tangled. He switched to chain and went and cut many of this
fellows pots in the area off Ida Lewis... I did not see any activity
after that by the lobstermen
Don
|