T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1041.1 | MAXPROP-OK | LDP::PARKER | | Wed Nov 09 1988 14:30 | 14 |
| I had a Martec folder on my Pearson 40 and found it to be "reasonable"
by this I mean I understood that it would not alow the boat to back
down as well as a fixed blade prop and it didn't. However it did
fold and therefore increased my speed under sail.
On my present boat, a Nauticat 43, I ordered a Maxprop feathering
three blade. I have been overjoyed. The boat motors like it has
a fixed prop, backs down like it has a fixed prop and sails like
it has a folder. An increased benefit of the Maxprop is somw
flexibility concerning the pitch of the prop. You can increase or
decrease the pitch to some extent based on speed/rpm/etc.
As further Maxprop propaganda the SSCA (seven seas cruising club)
gave the Maxprop one of it's four "perfects" in their yearly servey.
The only negative is the expense. The 16x22 was $1500.
|
1041.2 | Luke Feathering Prop... | LDYBUG::FACHON | | Thu Nov 10 1988 10:49 | 11 |
| Also look at the feathering props build by Luke (not
sure of their location -- anyone else know?). VERY
durable and dependable. My father has had a three-blader
on his boat for a dozen years at least, and it has always
performed flawlessly.
The Luke also had variable pitch. I'm not sure, but I
don't think the Maxprop does. Variable pitch "is best."
|
1041.3 | | MSCSSE::BERENS | Alan Berens | Thu Nov 10 1988 11:38 | 11 |
| Luke is in Boothbay Harbor, ME.
Variable pitch propellers add a fair bit of complexity to the
transmission-propeller shaft-propeller system. The ones I've seen use a
hollow propeller shaft to which the propeller is attached. Inside the
propeller shaft is another shaft that is used to adjust the pitch of the
propeller blades. I'm not sure that the advantages of variable pitch
(especially on a sailboat) outweigh the disadvantages of added weight,
increased cost, increased maintenance, and reduced reliability.
|
1041.4 | feathering prop | LDP::PARKER | | Fri Nov 11 1988 09:53 | 8 |
| I agree with the possibility of problems associated with a variable
pitch prop. A friend had one on his Westsail 42 and it was a constant
hassle until he replaced it with a fixed prop.
You might try some of the foreign mags for some ideas as varialbe
pitch and feathering seem to be used more there while folders are
a USA variant.
Luke has an excellent rep.
|
1041.5 | Progressive Pitch? | MANTIS::FACHON | | Fri Nov 11 1988 13:03 | 18 |
| Uh oh, I guess variable pitch is the wrong term (seems I'm
really slipping up lately). The Luke prop on my Dad's boat
does not have an internal shaft. I was referring to the design
of the prop's blades. Their angle of attack to the water is
greater at the hub, and flattens as the diamater increases. What
is this called? The Maxprop has uniform pitch from the hub out.
Not as efficient, and prone to "walking" in reverse from what
I've heard.
At any rate, the Luke-type of design I'm referring to provides
better thrust for a given diameter and rated pitch. Alan, I'm sure you
know what I'm talking about. Can you elaborate? Or has this
been discussed in an earlier note?
Do a dir/title=propeller, Dean...
Thanks ;)
|
1041.6 | Maxprop reliability | CECV03::WARDROP | | Thu Nov 17 1988 12:50 | 10 |
| I think the Maxprop has preset stops that can be reset, with the
prop removed, to adjust the effective pitch. Apparently you fiddle
with it till you get the best compromise for the boat, then leave
it like a fixed prop.
Anyway, I wondered whether the prop hitting the stops is a cause
for wear, noise, or other problems. Anyone know?
Rick,
|
1041.7 | reliability | LDP::PARKER | | Fri Nov 18 1988 11:17 | 6 |
| As far as the noise is concerned there is less with the MAXprop
than with the folder opening. As far as length of service mine mas
been in use for three years and has shown no signs of wear. These
props have been around for a while, in use mostly by the racers,
|
1041.8 | | LDYBUG::FACHON | | Mon Nov 21 1988 10:17 | 4 |
| The Luke on "Allez" is at least a dozen years
old and is still in perfect working condition.
|
1041.9 | Cruising Design Performance Props | SELECT::SPENCER | | Tue Feb 05 1991 09:20 | 32 |
| Since I can't find the note which digressed into this propeller
discussion, I'll put my reply here (appropriately). What follows is my
transcription of all the text in the Cruising Design, Inc. ad which
appeared in the Feb/Mar issue of Small Boat Journal. The also have a
picture, which is reminiscent (to my eyes) of a high-speed prop with
straight trailing edges; the one shown is two-bladed. Here's the text:
PERFECT PROPULSION
The performance of your engine is only as good as the propeller
it turns. With the Cruising Design Performance Propeller with Crystic
CopperClad you will gain speed, thrust and maneuverability.
The CD Performance Prop has a new and unique computer-designed
airfoil shape that gives your engine 80% more thrust in reverse and
20% more in forward.
[There's a little diagram of a blade cross-section shown, with
this caption: Unlike bronze blades, the CD blade is curved on both
sides like a true airfoil.]
All CD Performance Props provide greater speed at lower revolutions,
reducing noise and vibration while improving fuel efficiency.
CD Props are also available in Crystic CopperClad, either solid or
coated, to prevent barnacle growth that inhibits performance and adds
maintenance.
Remember, perfect propulsion can only be achieved with a Cruising
Design Performance Propeller. Available in 12", 14" and 15" diameters.
Call Joe today for more information at 508-532-2712.
CRUISING DESIGN, INC.
"The most reliable products for cruising"
P.O.Box 151
65 Walnut Street
Peabody, MA 01960
508-532-2712 VAX: 508-531-7577
|
1041.10 | My Gori works well for me | MARX::CARTER | | Tue Feb 05 1991 12:04 | 21 |
| I put a Gori folding prop on elysium two years ago. Reverse is much
better with the Gori than it was with the fixed prop which came on the
boat. I've had people who have Martec props on their boats tell me
that my boat has better response in reverse than theirs. I've never
been aboard a boat with a Martec, so can't make a first hand
comparison.
The Gori is made in Northern Europe, Denmark, I think. The blades are
geared to one another, such that one blade cannot open without the
other blade opening, also.
Late this past season I noticed my speed when powering was at least a half
knot slower than I would expect. When the boat came out, I found out
why. Barnacles and mussels had moved into the gears, preventing the
blades from fully opening. Guess that's what comes from not using the
engine often enough.
I forget the size, but elysium is a C+C 29, and the prop shaft is 7/8
of an inch. The prop cost about $750.
djc
|