T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
989.1 | 2 old 4 U ? | VNABRW::OSLANSKY_W | VVALTHARIVS VELOCIPEDICVS | Tue Jul 14 1992 05:51 | 7 |
|
"I C U R YY 4 me ..." -- Tell that your instructor, perhaps she/he will
appreciate your modesty by an extra notch.
Greetings from Vienna-Heart-of-Europe,
Walter :-)
|
989.2 | Light bulb | LINGO::KNOWLES | Caveat vendor | Tue Jul 14 1992 06:09 | 5 |
| There's a `how many C programmers does it take...' joke going the rounds,
but I didn't understand it enough to remember the details. If I find it
I'll post it.
b
|
989.3 | | KAHALA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 264-1930, DDD/M16 | Tue Jul 14 1992 06:25 | 13 |
| Not LEXical, much, but ...
The sequence I heard first ...
Lisp in action is like a finely choreographed ballet.
Ada in action is like a waltz of drugged elephants.
C in action is like a sword dance on a freshly waxed floor.
Others ...
BASIC is like ring-around-the-rosy in a schoolyard.
Pascal is like a spring frolic down a meandering stream.
FORTRAN is like two sumo wrestlers breakdancing.
|
989.4 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Jul 14 1992 06:38 | 6 |
| Heard when I first learned the language many years ago:
"C gives one all the power of assembly language,
with all the hassles of assembly language."
Again, not lexical, but somewhat true.
|
989.5 | | NSSMAC::BONNELL | Happy! Happy! Joy! Joy! | Tue Jul 14 1992 07:11 | 7 |
| There's some "C" humor in TURRIS::VAXC as well.
Some are "war-stories", there's also some humorous C code
regards...
...diane
|
989.6 | | STARCH::HAGERMAN | Flames to /dev/null | Tue Jul 14 1992 09:23 | 10 |
| Incidently, your suggested pun on "C shell" is, of course, already
implemented on virtually all Unix systems, which offer a choice between
the orignial Bourne shell (command interpreter), the C shell (which
has C-language-like syntax), the Korn shell, and who knows how many
others...
There are tons of similar puns floating around in Unix-land (e.g., Is
it true that Unix is a castrated version of Multics, thus "eunuch(s)"?)
Doug.
|
989.7 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Jul 14 1992 13:36 | 8 |
| Did you hear the one about the contest to determine which programming
language was best? Each language group was put into a separate section
of the contest area. When the C contestants were finished and left the
room, they were asked how they had produced their results so fast
when the other groups were still laboring. They said,
"Isn't that what you would expect from a C section"?
|
989.8 | good one | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Tue Jul 14 1992 14:00 | 6 |
|
Re: .7
That one gets a B++.
|
989.9 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Jul 14 1992 17:11 | 5 |
| Hmmm. I think I'd rather have a B--.
I'm hoping somebody can do better. Much better. I'd hate to tell that
joke in public, even for an extra grade point, and even if all the
resulting static is local.
|
989.10 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | bad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad. | Tue Jul 14 1992 20:38 | 16 |
| Re .6
>Is it true that Unix is a castrated version of Multics, thus "eunuch(s)"?
Yes, its name was chosen exactly for that reason.
Of course, now it's bigger than MULTICS was, but still castrated.
(Relatively less so by some vendors, but still.)
Incidentally, in the VAX C conference, if you do SHOW KEY HUMOR/FULL
you'll find that some of the jokes are lexical. However, jokes already
posted in that conference should be disqualified for a bonus point.
If you want a lexical C joke, there's always that program that is often
run as a front-end for YACC, despite being infamous for being slow.
-- Norman Diamond
|
989.11 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Jul 14 1992 22:50 | 8 |
| I'll go look in the VAXC conference again.
If you like, I can give you the instructor's e-mail address, and you
can discuss with him what jokes should be allowed or disallowed. From
the others told so far, most of them should be disallowed. I suggested
that one joke (which was funny but very off color) receive 2 points if
the guy promised not to try again, and THAT received a bigger laugh for
which I didn't get any credit. I suppose it wasn't Ceemly.
|
989.12 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Mon Jul 20 1992 21:45 | 4 |
| I told the joke in .7 and got my one point. It's still a horrible
joke, and I wish I'd had a better one. Oh, well. The things I'll do
when it looks like for the first time ever I can get a perfect score in
a course.
|
989.13 | re: .2 | A1VAX::KREFETZ | Reality is the fiction we live by. | Fri Jul 31 1992 10:05 | 6 |
|
Q. How many C++ programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
A. You're still thinking procedurally. A properly designed light bulb
object would inherit a change method from a generic light bulb class,
so all you'd have to do is send it a bulb change message.
|
989.14 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | bad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad. | Mon Aug 03 1992 19:45 | 6 |
| More precisely:
A. None. They send the lightbulb the message, "Change yourself."
("Pure" OO fanatics who have gone overboard really do talk that way,
so I think this wording captures the spirit much better.)
|
989.15 | | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Tue Aug 04 1992 08:25 | 6 |
| Right.
Over the weekend, I mailed .-2's joke (with the obvious .-1 adjustment)
to the C instructor as penance for the horrible one I told in class. He
told me yesterday, with a big smile, that I had now earned the point
rather than merely satisfying the requirement.
|
989.16 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | bad wiring. That was probably it. Very bad. | Wed Sep 16 1992 00:27 | 7 |
| One of my co-workers just hobbled in on crutches, with bright clean
white plaster all over one leg. I wanted to write:
a = (void*) b;
on it but he wouldn't let me :-(
I guess it isn't traditional in Japan to write on these things.....
|
989.17 | | COOKIE::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Fri Sep 18 1992 11:24 | 1 |
| I don't think he had a leg to stand on.
|
989.18 | More a 'musing' than an actual C-related joke... | RDVAX::KALIKOW | Buddy, can youse paradigm? | Fri Sep 18 1992 11:39 | 6 |
| In Orwellian terms...
... is C++ doubleplus ungood?
:-)
|