T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
605.1 | On numbering the events of the world | HSSWS1::GREG | Malice Aforethought | Wed Jan 04 1989 06:10 | 22 |
| re: .0
Once you get beyond three it's called 'a few'.
Once you get beyond six repetitions it's called 'several'.
That's the rule of thumb I use. I was never very
comfortable using 'thrice' either, and usuallup opt to
move the lower limit of 'a few' to three (rather than
four) repetitions.
But if it's new words you want...
Quadrice = Fourth
Quintice = fifth
Sextice = sixth
Septemice = seventh
Octice = eighth
etc, etc.
- Greg
|
605.2 | Does nice mean 0 times? | IOSG::LAWM | Don't utilise it - USE it! | Wed Jan 04 1989 12:56 | 7 |
|
ref: -.1
`Septemice' means more specifically `seven small furry rodents.'
Mat.
*:o)
|
605.3 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Thu Jan 05 1989 06:28 | 1 |
| "Septemice" refers to mice born in September.
|
605.4 | interesting so far.... | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Prussiking up the rope of life! | Thu Jan 05 1989 08:44 | 14 |
| G'day,
I thought about the erudite answers so far received.....
would it not be...
ON(e)ce
TW(o)ice
THR(ee)ice
FOU(r)ce
FIV(e)ice
SI(x)ce......
septemice - any relation of streptomycin? or are they against oneanother?
|
605.5 | Twice upon a time | MARVIN::KNOWLES | the teddy-bears have their nit-pick | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:40 | 8 |
| So does `trice' (as in "in a trice", meaning "quickly") mean `three
seconds'? (An analogy for this would be `brace of shakes', but that's
never shortened to plain `brace').
World-shattering thought: does a trice take longer than a brace
of shakes? (I shan't sleep tonight, wondering.)
b
|
605.6 | New counting systems...for wordplayers | LEZAH::BOBBITT | vis tecum sit | Sun Jan 08 1989 22:03 | 48 |
| These are all from a book called "ounce, dice, trice" - it's a word
play book, and really neat... now out of print (came out in 1958).
by Alastair Reid - here are some new counting systems....1 to 10
Ounce
Dice
Trice
Quartz
Quince
Sago
Serpent
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Denim
Instant
Distant
Tryst
Catalyst
Quest
Sycamore
Sophomore
Oculist
Novelist
Dentist
Archery
Butchery
Treachery
Taproom
Tomb
Sermon
Cinnamon
Apron
Nunnery
Density
Acreage
Brokerage
Cribbage
Cage
Sink
Sentiment
Ointment
Nutmeg
Doom
|
605.7 | A multiple solution? | LEDS::HAMBLEN | 3 Hooraws - Pogo's back! | Wed Jan 11 1989 14:49 | 30 |
|
Gentlepeople, it seems to me that we have not seriously considered
the need expressed by the base note. Clearly there is a need for such
expressions in incantations and similar ritual rhetoric. While wooing
Morpheus last night, the answer came to me: simply make use of the
arithmetic operations of addition and multiplication.
So, for a 4-tuple operation,
_twice twice_ , or _twice times twice_ , for emphasis
or _twice and twice_ , or _twice and twice again_.
(I especially like the last one with the _again_ given a British
pronunciation. Try it aloud.)
Similarly, for a 5-tuple situation, I offer:
_twice twice and once again_ , or
_twice and thrice again_.
For six times, how about:
_twice thrice_.
And for seven, especially recommended for rituals:
_twice thrice and once again_.
Squares and cubes are special occasions. For eight:
_twice twice twice_ ,or for added emphasis,
_twice times twice times twice_.
Nine times then becomes:
_thrice thrice_.
And ten:
_thrice thrice and once again_.
Variations abound, and will be left to the reader as an exercise,
as will the Biblical expression "seventy times seven".
Multiply yours,
Dave
|
605.8 | Where's the problem? | DDIF::STONE | Roy | Wed Jan 11 1989 21:04 | 13 |
| It seems like this whole topic is an attempt to complicate something
basically quite simple...
Once
Twice
Thrice or three times
Four times
Five times
Six times
etc.
They seem to work well for me.
|
605.9 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Thu Jan 12 1989 05:59 | 1 |
| Ahh, but .7 has a certain style that .8 totally lacks.
|
605.10 | keeps philosophers in business | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Thu Jan 12 1989 10:49 | 6 |
| RE: .-2
Complicating something basically quite simple is what life (in common
with this topic and this conference) is all about, isn't it?
Richard.
|
605.11 | don't talk to me about life..... | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Thu Jan 12 1989 11:15 | 12 |
| >< Note 605.10 by MARVIN::MACHIN >
^^^^^^
|
|
|
V
> Complicating something basically quite simple is what life (in common
> with this topic and this conference) is all about, isn't it?
You're on the wrong node. ;-)
Arie
|
605.12 | .7 is right, although only a sixth of fourty-two | VISA::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Thu Jan 12 1989 23:00 | 6 |
| "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number
of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six
hundred threescore and six". (revelations 13.18)
Sounds much better than :-
"Six six six is the number of the beast". (Iron Maiden)
|
605.13 | thrice is nice | CRLVMS::TREESE | Win Treese, Cambridge Research Lab | Thu Jan 12 1989 23:51 | 9 |
| And, verily, seventy times seven, in the notation of .7, becomes
twice thrice thrice thrice thrice thrice and twice twice again
It does get a little cumbersome, one must admit (once or twice,
that is).
- Win
|
605.14 | Ronald Wilson Reagan ?= 666 | COOKIE::DEVINE | Bob Devine, CXN | Fri Jan 13 1989 20:29 | 3 |
| Reagan new retirement home in California had the street address
of -- you guessed it! -- 666 (mumble lane). It was quickly
changed to 664 (mumble).
|
605.15 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Fri Jan 13 1989 21:22 | 2 |
| As a minor nit, the article I read said it was changed to 668,
but who cares, except, perhaps, Nancy's astrologer.
|