[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

597.0. "Adjectives" by CLARID::HODSMAN (Network Maintenance Services VBO) Fri Dec 16 1988 15:27

    After that excellent response about the subjuctive,
    I have another question for the grammar gurus:
    
    What are the rules for the order of adjectives?
    
    A couple of examples to show what I mean:
    
    1. A big red car and not a red big car
    
    2. A big expensive car 
       however an inexpensive little car sounds better.
    
    One answer maybe that you use the order to eliminate doubt
    
    eg a little underpowered car is ambiguous but an underpowered
    little car isnt.
    
    Jeremy
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
597.1Next to the NounMILLER::TURNBULLNostalgia ain't what it used to be!Fri Dec 16 1988 17:207
One rule is to place the adjective immediately preceeding the noun it modifies.
Another is to avoid, wherever possible, long strings of adjectives, perhaps by
rephrasing the sentence.  Anyone got any others?

Maybe after this topic we could go onto the use and placement of adverbs?

Cheers, Greg.
597.2RICKS::SATOWFri Dec 16 1988 17:4332
re: .1

Don't think your first rule helps much; the base note seems to be talking 
about two adjectives modifying the same noun.  Both can't immediately precede 
the noun.

I don't know the rule, but the the mental image of the first adjective is 
`stronger' to me.  So my mental image of 

				big red car

is a BIG car, that happens to be red.  Bigness is the dominant characteristic 
to me.  But
				red big car

makes me think of a red car that happens to be big.  Redness is the dominant 
characteristic.

My mental steps seem to be

big red car --> red `car' --> big `red car'

For some reason, a comma "evens out" the strength of the adjectives.  So

				big, red car

Is a car that happens to be both big and red.

This seemingly simple question seems to bring up an interesting example of how 
we mentally parse sentences.

Clay
597.3UNTADI::ODIJPo.......now + here = nowhere.......oFri Dec 16 1988 18:498
    I think that the more specific the adjective is , the closer it
    is to the noun . In the example used , "big" is relative , but "red"
    is not . I was trying to think of an example that didn't . But
    couldn't . 
    
    I am now off for a nice juicy steak .
    
    John J
597.4Always an exceptionHSSWS1::GREGMalice AforethoughtSat Dec 17 1988 06:1216
    re: .3 (JJ)
    
    	  That's a fair general rule, but there is one more thing
    	that should be mentioned, adjectives that describe other 
    	adjectives are not interchangable.  But that much is
    	self-evident.
    
    			Incredibly huge tree
    
    	would look ridiculous as:
    
    			huge incredibly tree
    
    	despite the fact that 'incredibly' is more specific than 'huge'.
    
    	- Greg
597.5incredibly is an adverbCRLVMS::TREESEWin Treese, Cambridge Research LabSun Dec 18 1988 00:015
    Well, technically, those are actually adverbs, and should come before
    the words they modify.
    
    	- Win
    
597.6but I've never seen red that's big..WELMTS::HILLMon Dec 19 1988 17:3113
    Re .5
    
    So is the answer to separate adjectives by commas, and leave adverbs
    in a string?                                  
                                                  
    It seems to me that in "big red car" both big and red are adjectives,
    since it is the car that's big, not the colour -- is this right?
    
    Anyway, with or without commas, what are the ordering rules when
    more than one adjective describes a noun?
    
    	Nick
    the adjective