T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
528.1 | I don't think dir/title would find it. :-) | ZFC::DERAMO | I am, therefore I'll think. | Tue Jun 07 1988 03:05 | 3 |
| P.S. That's in note 880.* in CLT::MATH
Dan
|
528.2 | not an old word | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 07 1988 16:51 | 5 |
| Webster's Ninth, which is not the best source in the world
but which happens to be on my desk, says it was coined in
1821; the quote is attributed to _Saturday Review_.
--bonnie
|
528.3 | A trivial reply | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | I Came,I Saw,I concurred | Wed Jun 08 1988 03:39 | 9 |
| G'day,
According to a Readers Digest, _the_ Oracle of trivia, A blue moon
occurred following a large volcanic eruption which left a fine haze
in the air that 'coloured' the moon blue. It has to be a large eruption
- one that fortunately happens once in a blue moon.
ANy use?
Derek
|
528.4 | on blue moons | DANUBE::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Jun 08 1988 04:26 | 10 |
| My understanding of blue moon was that it was any time there were
two full moons in one calendar month. This happens so rarely that
you get the expression "once in a blue moon".
One of my favorite SF short stories is called "Blue Moon" it was
published in Asimov about three years ago...does anyone recognize
it and remember the author...it is so funny that I laugh out loud
each time I read it.
Bonnie
|
528.5 | | 21001::BOYAJIAN | Monsters from the Id | Wed Jun 08 1988 11:46 | 6 |
| re:.4
Are you perhaps thinking of "Blued Moon" by Connie Willis? It
appeared in the Jan 1984 issue of ASIMOV'S.
--- jerry
|
528.6 | | TWEED::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:08 | 3 |
| re .5 Yes indeed, thankyou :-)
Bonnie
|
528.7 | might be | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:13 | 6 |
| re: .3
That would fit the date Webster's gives -- Krakatoa blue up somewhere
around 1890, didn't it?
--bonnie
|
528.8 | '50's rock song about Blue-oo Moooooooon, | VIDEO::OSMAN | type video::user$7:[osman]eric.vt240 | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:26 | 19 |
| Wasn't there a 50's rock unroll singer that did a sang that goes
Blue-oo Moooooooooon, I saw you standin' theeeeeeeeeeeere....
-----------|---------|---------------------|------------------
G E | G |F G A G F | G
-----------|---------|---------------------|-----------------
___ | | ___ |
---|-------|---------|----|--|---|---------|-----------------
| ___ | | | | o| | | |
--O|.--|---|--O------|-|-O|.----O|----|----|-----O-----------
| | |O| O| |
------o|---|---------|---------------------|-----------------
how's my music notation, o.k. ? I realize I should show quarters
vs. halves, but this terminal is gassed Lee.
/Eric
|
528.9 | I don't understand | PSTJTT::TABER | Touch-sensitive software engineering | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:29 | 8 |
| > My understanding of blue moon was that it was any time there were
> two full moons in one calendar month. This happens so rarely that
> you get the expression "once in a blue moon".
Even if you grant that it's sorta-not-very-but-kinda rare for that to
happen, what has it got to do with blue?
>>>==>PStJTT
|
528.10 | why does this note say 15:something. It's 9:30 here | VIDEO::OSMAN | type video::user$7:[osman]eric.vt240 | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:33 | 11 |
| By the way, where is this file ? I'm in Maynard, my computer says
it's now 9:31, which is about right. But the note I just put in
says
15:something
at the top. Is that correct ? Even if this file is in England
(where it probably is 15:something), aren't the top time stamps
on notes supposed to represent the local submittor's time ?
/Eric
|
528.11 | one of those "once in a blue moon" errors ? | VIDEO::OSMAN | type video::user$7:[osman]eric.vt240 | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:34 | 1 |
| Hmmmm. maybe that's it :-)
|
528.12 | Dust | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Danger was this man's speciality | Wed Jun 08 1988 16:44 | 10 |
| .3 gives the derivation I've met. John Gribbin, then Physics Editor of
New Scientist, mentioned it in - I think - Origins (dunno the
publisher, but there was an OUP paperback in 1981 or 1982), tho' I'm
not sure he'd have been happy with the word haze (more like dust). He
was talking about Mt St Helen's, and he mentioned Krakatoa (and
nuclear exchanges of any size). That sort of thing, occurring once
in a blue moon, can radically upset the northern hemisphere's food
production.
b
|
528.13 | Sorry volcanophiles, guess again. | SMURF::BINDER | A complicated and secret quotidian existence | Wed Jun 08 1988 21:00 | 20 |
| Re: .2, .3, .7
Websters: 1821. Krakatoa: 1887. "The year without a summer", caused by
a very dusty eruption: 1816.
The problem with the volcano theory is that atmospheric dust tends to
cause a reddening of transmitted light by increasing the absorption of
the shorter-wavelength end of the spectrum. It is this phenomenon that
makes red sunsets. After Krakaroa, sunsets were redder in England for
nearly three years. The moon looks yellower or redder under these
conditions, too; this is why the Harvest Moon is such a pronounced
golden color. (The atmosphere has had all summer to pick up dust, which
it can't do as readily during the winter.)
Two full moons in a month is the only explanation I'd ever heard before
reading this note. As a side note, there can never be two full moons in
February except in leap year, because the lunar month is longer than 28
days.
- Dick
|
528.14 | it was so blue | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Jun 08 1988 22:37 | 9 |
| re: .13
The moon looked blue right after Mt. St. Helens' erupted. (I
lived in Montana, where we got a dusting of ash.)
I don't know why (and didn't connect it with the 'once in a
blue moon' phrase!) but I did see it.
--bonnie
|
528.15 | | 21001::BOYAJIAN | Monsters from the Id | Thu Jun 09 1988 10:49 | 11 |
| re:.7
"... Krakatoa blue up..."
Love it!
re:.10
No, the timestamp on notes shows the time local to the conference.
--- jerry
|
528.16 | once in a blue moon ... | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Thu Jun 09 1988 15:39 | 11 |
| re: .10, .15
Right, the time stamp is local to the conference - otherwise
how would you decide what order notes were entered in.
Currently it is summer time in the South of France, and your
moderator is sitting in the afternoon sunshine on a week's holiday,
and wondering whether he has the energy to get into the swimming
pool. Those of you in the U.S. will hardly be awake yet, while those
in Melbourne will be gently shiverring while the snow settles round
the kangaroos' ears.
|
528.17 | Blue with cold, maybe? | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Maybe it is, it is not and indeterminate! | Fri Jun 10 1988 02:53 | 20 |
| G'day,
Aksherly, (and living in Sydney I should not admit it) Melbourne
has had better weather than Sydney lately. :-( Tho the skiing
is going to be brilliant this year in the snowfields - they have
25-35cm already and the season opens tomorrow. (Personally _I_ think
snow should be restricted to Christmas cards - mainly, I suppose,
because I can't afford to go skiing :-(( ) Now,it has been noted
that snow has never fallen on the City of Sydney though N Sydney
did ONCE get snow that lasted for about two minutes.
Once in a blue moon, The Blue mountains get snow and thats only
about 50 miles from Sydney.
The kangaroos' comments have not been recorded but are believed
to be in the best British tradition and along the lines of
Bloody cold, innit!
Djw
|
528.18 | Technical digression / rathole | DR::BLINN | Let them eat barbecue | Fri Jun 10 1988 05:46 | 10 |
| Although NOTES-11 cared about timestamps (it kept track of the
next note as being the next chronologically), VAX Notes no longer
depends on this (it assigns a unique [serial] number to each note,
and maintains a list of the unseen notes by number).
Prior to VAX Notes, since the timestamp got applied by the
writer's copy of NOTES-11 (not by a server local to the
conference), keeping the timestamps in order was a challenge.
Tom
|
528.19 | Blue Moon DooWhop | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Jun 14 1988 17:41 | 18 |
| re .8 and the song "Blue Moon" - it is actually a jazz "standard"
that goes way back (to the '30s or so?).
The initial lyric (your notes are correct) is
Blue Moon, you saw me standing alone
This version of the song (done by the Diamonds?) is probably most
famous for its doowhop accompaniment:
Bomp boppa bomp, babompa bomp bomp
Boppa bomp boopa bomp, a danga dang dang
A dinga dong ding
len.
|
528.20 | Some more words | IOSG::VICKERS | Entropy isn't what it used to be | Tue Jun 14 1988 17:55 | 13 |
|
Blue moon, you saw me standing alone,
without a dream in my heart,
without a love of my own.
Blue moon, you knew just what I was there for,
You heard me saying a prayer for,
someone I really could care for.
Can't remember the rest, but give me a break, I'm only 21 so I wasn't
even around when it was popular !
Paul V
|
528.21 | The Chorus (or is the Bridge?) | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Jun 14 1988 20:09 | 7 |
| Then suddenly appeared before me
The only one my heart has ever known (??)
Then somebody whispered, "please adore me",
And when I looked, the moon had turned to gold
len.
|
528.22 | "Blue Moon", 1961, by the Marcels | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Tue Jun 14 1988 23:42 | 0 |
528.23 | 2-3 years VS. 1 year:money back guarronnnnteee | PCASSO::MACGREGOR | Ceiror the Calm | Mon Aug 22 1988 19:39 | 6 |
| I don't know how so many people can think a "Blue Moon" can happen
only once every 2 or 3 years. It seems to me that a lunar month
is 28 days (possibly 29) in which case it will occur 13 times in
12 months with a few days error. Thus the "Blue Moon" occurs once
every year plus or minus a few days. Please correct me if I'm wrong
and explain your reason.
|
528.24 | Two Half Moons don't make a blue | RICKS::SATOW | | Mon Aug 22 1988 20:04 | 11 |
| re: .23
The definition is the second FULL moon of a calendar month. By
your calculation, there will be at least one month that has the
same phase twice, but that phase could be one of four phases.
By this reasoning, a blue moon should occur once every four years
or so. Don't ask me about the 2 -- 3. (Or is it 2-3 or 2 - 3?)
Perhaps it's because of the 31 day months that make it more likely
that two phases will occur in the same month.
Clay
|
528.25 | Recheck your math | LOV::LASHER | Working... | Mon Aug 22 1988 20:44 | 11 |
| Re: .24 [Re: .23]
"By your calculation, there will be at least one month that has the
same phase twice, but that phase could be one of four phases."
I don't see where you get this "one month per year with duplicate
phases." I thought the calculation was meant to show that there
would be 13 full moons in a year. Wouldn't that force there to
be some month each year with 2 full moons?
Lew Lasher
|
528.26 | GIGO | ERIS::CALLAS | Waiter, there's a bug in my code | Tue Aug 23 1988 00:52 | 14 |
| Actually, it helps to do the right math with the right numbers. The
lunar cycle is 29.5 days. Actually is 29.46... days, but we'll call it
29.5. The upshot of this is that there are *not* 13 full moons in a
year. There are 12 full moons most years, and 13 full moons every ~2.68
years. During a year with thirteen full moons, one of them is blue, by
the pigeonhole principle.
Note that this assumes that the months are all of equal length. In the
real world, there can never be a blue moon in February, and it is more
likely that the blue moon will happen in a month with 31 days than 30,
for the obvious reason that it's easier to stuff a 29.5 day stick in a
31-day sack than a 30-day sack.
Jon
|
528.27 | For my fellow rockin' Joyceans | STAR::RDAVIS | The Man Without Quantities | Sat Mar 10 1990 21:32 | 9 |
| In his magnificent youth, Elvis Presley did a version of "Blue Moon"
which I often play on June 16:
"Bloom... You saw me standing alone..."
He also covered "Blue Moon of Kentucky". I assume that song's title
was a moonshine-inspired jumble of "blue moon" and "blue grass".
Ray
|
528.28 | | AITG::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, nice person | Sun Mar 11 1990 14:57 | 18 |
| > <<< VISA::USER:[NOTES$LIBRARY]JOYOFLEX.NOTE;1 >>>
> -< The Joy of Lex >-
> ================================================================================
> Note 528.0* Mommy, where do blue moons come from? 27 replies
> POOL::HALLYB "Lookit all the happy creatures dancin" 11 lines 6-JUN-1988 23:48
[...] ^^^^^^^^^^
> By that definition you
> can expect a blue moon roughly once every 2.5 years.
[...]
And flipping through my calendar for 1990 (do it, and
watch how the day of the full moon changes from month to
month) shows that there will be a blue moon on New Year's
Eve.
Make your party plans accordingly! :-)
Dan
|
528.29 | | STARV3::MACGREGOR | | Thu Mar 15 1990 15:02 | 9 |
| Let's think about the "February can't have a blue moon" theory.
Every four years February gets one extra day (29) so it still isn't
enough. Every four hundred years February loses a day (27) unless
it is also one of every two thousand years, in which case February
will have 30 days. I believe something also happens on multiples
of 10,000 years, but I forget what it is. I'm not saying it will
happen, but theoritically you CAN have a "blue moon" in February.
The Wizard
|
528.30 | | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Mar 15 1990 18:11 | 10 |
| re: .-1
> Every four hundred years February loses a day (27)
I think every 400 years (e.g. 1600 A.D., 2000 A.D.) is NOT a leap year, so
February is its normal, 28-day length.
As far as your 2,000-year and 10,000-year events are concerned, I think they
qualify as happening only once in a blue moon.
Jon
|
528.31 | You got it backwards | PROXY::CANTOR | Eat any good books lately? | Fri Mar 16 1990 07:03 | 21 |
| Re .29,.30
The rule is:
February has 28 days except
In a year divisible by four February has 29 days except
In a year divisible by 100 February has only 28 days except
In a year divisible by 400 February does have 29 days.
There are no other exceptions.
So 1900, 2100, 2200 are not leap years, but
2000 will be, and so will 2400, as long as the current calendar rules
are in effect. 1600 occured before these rules were adopted.
This has been discussed an infinite number of times on the e-net.
Dave C.
|
528.32 | for facts with fun... | WELMTS::HILL | Technology is my Vorpal sword | Fri Mar 16 1990 09:52 | 2 |
| For the definitive leap year answer see Stan's answer in
HACKERS_V1 216.13
|
528.33 | | TKOV51::DIAMOND | This note is illegal tender. | Fri Apr 06 1990 05:14 | 4 |
| Ah, but every 2000 years some fool dictator changes the calendar
and then *anything* can happen.
February used to have 30 days before the Romans got to it.
|
528.34 | More trivia | ROULET::RUDMAN | Always the Black Knight. | Mon Jul 02 1990 20:17 | 15 |
| Very illuminating.
I had thought there was a larger time span between Blue Moons, but
I got it from a not-so-scientific story. When I was little my parents
occasionally bought me a "fun" book, the ones with the games & riddles
& puzzles & stories & jokes & such. In one of those books was
a story about such an event, a rememberance by an elderly lady about
a blue moon which occured when she was a young girl.
I mention this soley to maybe trigger a childhood memory out there
somewhere, a nice little story read ONCE IN A BLUE MOON.
As in "Once in a blue moon," said old Mrs. O'Malley.
Don
|
528.35 | Live and learn | RTPSWS::GREENE | Bony fingers | Thu Jul 12 1990 21:44 | 7 |
| And I always thought a blue moon was what you see when a Smurf pulls
down his pants!
Sorry, I read through this whole topic looking for that one; I couldn't
resist!
Allison
|