T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
478.1 | Well, *someone* has to do it... :-) | ZYMRGY::LAMBERT | Another day, another '$ ' prompt | Mon Feb 08 1988 22:04 | 16 |
| re: .0
> I think I shall screem.
.
.
.
> I am going to screem!
> He is going to screem, too.
If I see one more person around here mis-spell the word 'scream' I think
I shall.
(Many, many :-)'s)
-- Sam
|
478.2 | sigh | TERZA::ZANE | unique to one, common to all | Tue Feb 09 1988 00:39 | 12 |
|
Somebody ought to (oughtta) start a collection. I wait at my terminal
impatiently every day for a new memo from Facilities, so that I have
a good excuse to break out into paroxysms of laughter. Today it was,
"If you have material that is to be scraped, it is your responsibility
to fill out the proper paperwork..."
How about my windshield on icy mornings? :^)
Terza
|
478.3 | I can't bare it. | DELNI::CANTOR | Dave C. | Tue Feb 09 1988 13:35 | 15 |
| Re .0
Their/there also they're
More.
Wear/we're
Bear/bare/beer
Re .1
'Misspell' doesn't need a hyphen. One can often see that
word misspelled as 'mispell.'
Dave C.
|
478.4 | Metaplasmus | KAOA08::CUSUP_LAPLAN | | Tue Feb 09 1988 16:23 | 9 |
| re .0
Sue was using metaplasmus to make her point (in case anyone is
interested) and most effectively at that.
I often use it for one of two reasons:
1. most people don't know what it means
2. it covers my errors even when they know what it means
|
478.5 | metaplasmus? | RAVEN1::MKENNEDY | | Tue Feb 09 1988 19:06 | 2 |
|
What is "metaplasmus?" My office edition doesn't have it.
|
478.6 | | GENRAL::JHUGHES | NOTE, learn, and inwardly digest | Tue Feb 09 1988 20:09 | 9 |
| re: .-1
> What is "metaplasmus?" My office edition doesn't have it.
Mine (Webster's New Collegiate) does:
metaplasm n 1[L metaplasmus, lit., transformation, fr. Gk
metaplasmos ...]: alteration of regular structure usually by
transposition of the letters or syllables of a word or of the
words in a sentence
|
478.7 | Oh. Thank you. | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | SOCK it to ME??! | Wed Feb 10 1988 00:38 | 0 |
478.8 | SCREAM - SCREEEEEAM | 17442::S_LECLAIR | | Wed Feb 10 1988 16:29 | 6 |
| I am quite aware that I misspelled scream. Just wanted to see if
you all were paying attention. You have to admit; it did grab and
hold your attention! (at least for a few seconds)
Sue
|
478.9 | Another metaplasmus | JANUS::CROWLE | esto quod esse videris | Thu Feb 11 1988 13:28 | 12 |
| Re: Screem - reminds me of a product which used to be sold in the
UK in the fifties (that dates me, but do I care?). Rejoicing under
the brand name of Brylcreem, it was (is?) a white, oily grease (John
Travolta, eat your heart out) intended to be applied to the hair,
producing those statuesque, shiny hairstyles so characteristic of
the period. I think the Brylcreem "factory" still exists, adjacent
to a railway line leading into London...
So a "screem" is a rather slippery "scream" to me - less raucous,
smoother, melodious even?
-- brian
|
478.10 | RE: Brylcreem | RAVEN1::MKENNEDY | Eschew sesquipedalianism! | Thu Feb 11 1988 19:47 | 1 |
| "A little dab will do ya!"
|
478.11 | Re: Brylcreem - LINE 2 | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Progress:=!(going_backwards>coping) | Fri Feb 12 1988 07:24 | 4 |
|
"The girls will love to run their fingers through your hair"
|
478.12 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | $50 never killed anybody | Fri Feb 12 1988 08:52 | 8 |
| Just as offensive is metaplasm on the part of manufacturers for
their products. Not for purposes of trademark, but to fool the
public into thinking it's getting one thing when it's actually
getting another, without getting caught in a falsehood.
The most obvious example: "creme (or even worse, "kreme") filling".
--- jerry
|
478.13 | cooking with Brylcream? | COMICS::DEMORGAN | Richard De Morgan, UK CSC/CS | Fri Feb 12 1988 09:27 | 5 |
| My "Bored of the Rings" says "[Boggies] ... fondness for dishes cooked
in Brylcream".
^
Maybe they spelt it differently in the US. I can remember the stuff
still being around in the UK in the 60s.
|
478.14 | hear hear - here here, there there | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Progress:=!(going_backwards>coping) | Mon Feb 15 1988 00:49 | 7 |
| G'day,
There is still oodles of Brylcream here to buy (or to cook in too)
for Gentlemen to use on their hair, I hear. If you wish I can ship
a jar or two too, to you - so There!
Derek
|
478.15 | I think we're off the subject! | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | SOCK it to ME??! | Tue Feb 16 1988 00:07 | 4 |
| Checked it out Saturday and find you can still buy it by the tube. I Didn't
look any further so I don't know if it also comes in jars.
Mike
|
478.16 | I'd prefer an abstract alternative... | JANUS::CROWLE | esto quod esse videris | Tue Feb 16 1988 11:12 | 7 |
| RE .14, .15 - Thanks, but no thanks. Have no wish to come into contact
with the stuff again ...
Now, a jar of Metaplasmus, that would really be something else ...
:-)
-- brian
|
478.17 | Creative spelling & words | VOLGA::S_LECLAIR | | Tue Feb 16 1988 20:31 | 13 |
|
Re: .13
< Maybe they spelt it differently in the US. I can remember the
There is no such word as "spelt". The word is "spelled"
And while I'm on the subject of spelling and wrong words - how
about IRregardless? There is no such word in the English language
as irregardless. The word is regardless. This is just another
one that makes me want to scream.
Sue
|
478.18 | Orientated | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | | Tue Feb 16 1988 22:11 | 0 |
478.19 | Cultural imperialism strikes again | LOV::LASHER | Working... | Thu Feb 18 1988 01:05 | 12 |
| Re: .17
-< Creative spelling & words >-
Re: .13
< Maybe they spelt it differently in the US. I can remember the
There is no such word as "spelt". The word is "spelled"
Looks like another case of American nearsightedness. I believe
"spelt" is acceptable usage in the U.K.
Lew Lasher
|
478.20 | Not too bad a spell | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Thu Feb 18 1988 01:26 | 10 |
| Re: .17
>There is no such word as "spelt". The word is "spelled"
According to Webster's New World Dictionary, 'spelt' is an alternate
past test and past participle of 'spell.' The word is commonly
used, perhaps more so in England than here, but one encounters it
often enough in literature, criticism, and commentary.
Bernie
|
478.21 | reminds me of a truly awful joke... | JANUS::CROWLE | On a clear disk you can seek forever | Thu Feb 18 1988 11:04 | 9 |
| What does a smelter tell you when you ask him what he does for a
living?
And when he tells you, do you wonder whether he's still in gainful
employment?
:-(
-- brian
|
478.22 | This is a bilingual file | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading UK | Thu Feb 18 1988 13:51 | 5 |
| Thank you .19 and .20 for putting right .17. I get really hot under
the collar when foreigners try to tell me how my own language should
be spelt. :-)
Jeff.
|
478.23 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Sat Feb 20 1988 21:52 | 3 |
| Think nothing of it. It is something that I learnt.
Bernie
|
478.24 | | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2T20 | Mon Feb 22 1988 18:56 | 1 |
| re: .23 - Don't be shy about .22's gratitude - you earnt it.
|
478.25 | Sorry | TWEED::S_LECLAIR | | Tue Feb 23 1988 16:20 | 4 |
| Most humble apologies!
Sue
|
478.26 | Agsepted :-) :-) | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading UK | Wed Feb 24 1988 14:14 | 1 |
|
|
478.27 | Excepted? | LOV::LASHER | Working... | Wed Feb 24 1988 15:35 | 1 |
|
|
478.28 | Of coarse, how sly of me! | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading UK | Wed Feb 24 1988 21:53 | 1 |
|
|
478.29 | Heads or Tales? | MEIS::FONSECA | I heard it through the Grapevine... | Wed Feb 24 1988 23:56 | 7 |
| re: .10 or so
Rock stars from the late 50's used another product in their
hair: Preparation H. I don't remember where I heard this,
but I imagine it had better holding power in the long run.
-Dave
|
478.30 | On too/to/two | CNTROL::HENRIKSON | | Tue Jan 03 1989 02:56 | 9 |
| I've found something you can say but not write.
We have the words too,to and two in the English language.
So, there are three ___s(?) in the English language.
Fill in the blank.
Pete
|
478.31 | and another | CHEFS::LAWSONM | Start 1989 with Jesus Christ | Tue Jan 03 1989 08:58 | 8 |
| I think there is another one along the lines of .30
I sew my shirt, my brother is sowing some seed.
We are both ...ing ??
aa
Mark
|
478.32 | et tu? | MARKER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Tue Jan 03 1989 13:58 | 9 |
| Re .30 (Pete):
"tu" (phon)
Re .31
"doing different activities." :-)
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
478.33 | $$$ | VAXWRK::SIMON | Hugs Welcome Anytime! | Tue Jan 03 1989 19:35 | 2 |
| By, Bye, Buy
|
478.34 | wrong order! | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Wed Jan 04 1989 09:33 | 8 |
| RE -1
> By, Bye, Buy
I thought it was By, Buy, Bye!!!
:-):-)
Arie
|
478.35 | It *can* be done! | SSGBPM::KENAH | Full circle -- closure | Thu Jan 05 1989 23:11 | 9 |
| re: To/too/two I read this puzzle once; the setup was similar to
what Pete mentioned, where an executive was trying to outwit his
secretary.
He dictated the sentence, and the secretary didn't hesitate; she wrote
the sentence done as soon as she heard it. How did she manage that
trick?
andrew
|
478.36 | | CNTROL::HENRIKSON | | Fri Jan 06 1989 02:11 | 4 |
|
Must have been shorthand but, I'd like to see the letter she typed out.
Pete
|
478.37 | Indeed -- he was so flustered, he forgot to ask... | SSGBPM::KENAH | Happy Birthday, Mr. Holmes | Fri Jan 06 1989 21:52 | 0 |
478.38 | You can tie-dye your tutu, too. | DDIF::CANTOR | Logout and hit break. | Wed Feb 22 1989 06:57 | 7 |
| Re .32 (ct 30)
> "tu" (phon)
Yes, but two "tu"s together make a tutu.
Dave C.
|