T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1700.1 | learn to love it | GENRAL::ROOHR | | Tue Aug 14 1990 19:35 | 8 |
| First and foremost make sure you enjoy it! The best long term wieght
loss program is a love for an activity like this, if it's done as work
I know I tend not to keep at it very long.
As far as the kind of ride my opinion is that the longer rides, that
keep your heartrate elevated the longest will do you the most good.
Short intense rides will be more of muscle and strength builders.
Good luck and enjoy!
Larry
|
1700.2 | Beats the heck out of mowing the lawn!!! | NCDEL::PEREZ | Just one of the 4 samurai! | Wed Aug 15 1990 00:35 | 17 |
| Well, I definitely don't qualify as an expert, but in note 1233, which
I started last year, there is some advice on riding from people who
are.
I wholeheartedly agree with .1 - if you don't like what you're doing,
you won't do it. For me, it meant getting up to longer distances
(35-50 miles) so I could get to more distant places and see something
new. I also get to burn up some calories which would help me continue
losing weight if I DIDN'T EAT SO MUCH ICE CREAM! In an early note,
there's even a chart of clories burned per minute and per mile.
One of the things that helps me is periodically going on organized
rides with other people. It makes the miles go by a little faster with
someone to talk to. At the same time, one of the great joys is getting
out all alone somewhere, with a nice icy bottle of water, some fruit, a
paperback to read while resting, and an off-road bike route that goes
nowhere.
|
1700.3 | Ya gotta love it! | CRBOSS::BEFUMO | IRAQnophobia | Wed Aug 15 1990 08:59 | 22 |
| Absolutely - a super elaborate exercise schedule that you won't stick
with will do little good. Settle on the pace/frequency/distances that
you enjoy and take it from there. I've been riding for, I guess, about
two months now. I started, also, as a weight loss activity, but have
discovered that I absolutely love it. I ride to work (5.5 miles) 4
times per week (one day I'm off site), and have gotten up to 40 miles
on weekends (gonna go for 50 this weekend). I'm finding that I prefer
the longer distances 'cause it takes me a good 8-10 miles till I really
come onto my second wind & start getting into it.
One small comment on your base note - don't be AFRAID of building
up some muscle. First of all, it's a SLOW process - you won't wake up
one morning and find that you have 30" thighs or anything. Also, a
pound of muscle is a lot more compact and shapely than a pound of fat,
so even if you build muscle at the same rate you lose fat, you're gonna
look a lot better. Finally, all else being equal, if you have a bit
more muscle, the same daily activities are going to burn more calories,
so you'll find that you lose weight faster as you get stronger. A lot
of women are afraid of building muscle and looking like men, but unless
you're pumped up on steroids, that's really not going to happen. For
the most part, women will not tend to get as bulky as men, no matter
how hard and heavy the work out.
|
1700.4 | "behold, the human food-vacuum!" | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:36 | 26 |
|
The foregoing replies are good advice. Be warned, however, that
bicycling is not the optimum way to tone up/slim down your whole
body. If you *just* bicycle, you will do very little for your gut
and only some for your upper body. Also, cycling is appetite producing
(or rather, hunger producing). Racers going out for a 20-40 mile
sprint lose all liking for food for hours, but more moderate cycling,
especially high mileage per week or long distances make the
practitioner evolve into a "food-vacuum" (speaking from experience).
That's not bad in itself, but it means you must be *careful* to (1)
keep your appetite from running away with you, and (2) eat the right
things, since you will be eating more things.
RE: .-1 - the good women cyclists I've seen don't turn into Arnold
Schwarzenegger, but they do have more massive quads and other leg-parts,
at least many of them.
The best exercise I've found for losing weight, by the way, is jogging
or running. (Not sprinting - jogging or running.) For some reason it
just melts the fat (and even the muscle mass!) off. But it is
potentially more harmful to the body (joints, etc.). Still, it might
be a good cross-training for bicycling.
good luck!
-john
|
1700.5 | No real answer but... | WAV13::DELORIEA | Jerseys @#%@!& Jerseys | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:38 | 28 |
| > I would like some info from experienced riders on what is the best
> way to approach biking as a tool to help in weight loss and toning.
> I have been doing 10-12 miles a day for the past 3 weeks or so
> (I have a 15-speed mountain bike). I do not want to build a lot
> of muscle right away--I'd prefer to burn off fat.
One point. I've seen inexperienced riders out on their bikes cranking along in
one of their highest gears. I'm not talking about plodding along slowly pushing
the pedals but grinding it out in a gear much too hard. I asked a girl one day
I saw doing that and her reply was that she wanted to lose some weight and she
figured that the harder it was to pedal the more weight she would lose...
My first thought was, her knees better be in good shape to handle that
stress and Yuch, what a losy way to "lose weight/ride a bike". Then as I
continued my ride I thought about weight lifting and the way this girl was
riding. I know a slow, heavy rep's with the weights tears muscle and builds bulk
while fast, light reps tone the muscle. I don't know if this is completely
true for all people but my guess is that a fast cadence (pedal revs) with an
easy gear while still getting your heart rate up into a target range will tone
you faster than trying to crank/grind it out in the bike.
Also use a tape to measure your waist and hips and so on. Going on weight alone
might discourage you, because you will be toning up and losing fat but holding
water and gaining some muscle weight.
OK lets here from Jim Pammer...
tom
|
1700.6 | Running i better. | TOPTEN::PLEVA | Fat birds don't fly... | Wed Aug 15 1990 20:38 | 13 |
| I agree with .4 that running is the best way to lose weight however
speaking from experience, you are much more prone to injury.
I had been a devoted runner until I destroyed my knee last October
by overuse, I had increased my weekly milage from 20 to 70 for
a couple weeks while attending training.
I started riding my mountain bike 70-100 miles per week to keep
in shape, but it just isn't the same. As sson as I can return
to running I will be carefull and do both riding and running or
both fitness and weigth control.
I prefer to go on longer rides , 30-50 miles.
|
1700.7 | Keeping fork away from face helps A LOT! :-) | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | IronFish Tamer. | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:07 | 10 |
| Just a recommendation for for weight-loss, as I've been at it for a
while now. Reduced food intake and a moderate increase in exercise level
seems to be working for me. Both my wife & I have been on a reduced cal.
diet (ala one of the commercial weight-loss programs) and I've been
doing 10-12 mile rides at lunch a few daze a week and somewhat longer
rides (35 or so) on one day on the weekends. So far I'm thinning out
rather nicely (as pointed out, doesn't do much for the upper body
tone...). In the past 9 weeks or so on this program have dropped more
than 30 lbs.... maybe 15 to go?
ken
|
1700.8 | | MANIC::THIBAULT | Crisis? What Crisis? | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:28 | 14 |
| re:: <<< Note 1700.7 by SUSHI::KMACDONALD "IronFish Tamer." >>>
>> -< Keeping fork away from face helps A LOT! :-) >-
espcecially if it's your bicycle's fork :-).
I wouldn't worry too much about getting muscles. I had knee surgery in May,
and since then I've been trying to build up my badly atrophied muscles.
Believe me, it's not an easy task. I've made lots of progress but I still
haven't caught up with my good leg. Since I'll be having more surgery in
less than 3 weeks (ugh) I'm gonna have to start the whole thing over again,
and this time it's really gonna be ugly.
Jenna (whose bike will soon be retired for the season :-( ).
|
1700.9 | Cycling for weight loss | AYOV24::RGELVIN | | Fri Aug 17 1990 07:18 | 40 |
| All the foregoing offer good advice. I agree that middle to distance
running is definitely the fastest way to lose weight but also that
it produces a lot of torn ligaments, sprains, swollen tendons, etc,
etc. I know this from personal experience. However biking is also
not without it's mishaps and some of them can be a lot more painful
than any of the above, broken ribs, fractured pelvis and numerous
cuts and bruises, again from personal experience. However bright
clothing, helmets and sensible route planning can go a long way
towards at least lessening the risks that go with riding a bike.
I personally now do very little running concentrating more on weight
training (light weights with more reps), skipping (great for toning
and easily transportable when travelling) and cycling. Cycling is
far and away the most enjoyable sport I have ever tried and there-
fore the most sustainable. I cycle to and from work every day (30
miles) also I usually go out for short evening run with my girlfriend
who is trying to tone herself up rather than lose weight (she is
very pleased with the results so far). At the weekends I use the bike
for longer runs to visit friends all over the country and usually
manage to cover between two to three hundred miles.
I find however that my weight alters very little from week to week. In
the winter my weekly cycling reduces by about two hundred miles
on average but then so does my appetite. What does come down however
is my level of fitness and muscle tone in my legs. The advice offered
in a previous reply is worth taking and that is if weight loss is
the aim then you will still have to watch your appetite. Biking
is a definite appetite builder and I find eating increases in line
with the distances I cover. Also go for the higher cadence, I personaly
know a girl who pushes very high gears and has done so for years.
From the back you would swear you were cycling behind a guy who had
done years of squats with heavy weights. Pushing high gears also
greatly increases the risk of knee problems, as has already been
mentioned.
I'm sure you will achieve your aim. This notesfile has many entries
from people who took up cycling to loose weight and ended up doing
so and also loving the sport.
All the Best Richard
|
1700.10 | Get on that scale | SUBWAY::SCHULMAN | | Fri Aug 17 1990 10:45 | 24 |
| As it turns out I have been riding for many years and found that there
was no way to loose weight without "Dieting". Its true that bicycling
seems to increae your appetite. Exercise and Diet for the weight loss.
As for biking as an exercise its important not to starve your muscles
from food stuff. You'll find that you really need the food, keep it in
moderation. After reading a lot about the topic for the best results
keep your pedaling at a constant rate of 80 RPMs. Going up hills or
down hills keep it at 80. Also when your at that rate you have to keep
it up for no less than a full ten minutes. As mentioned in .6 and as
in weight lifting, more reps less weight for exercise, and if you want
to bulk up more weight less reps. If you keep to 80 Revolutions Per
Minute you'll find that the sweat will just start dripping off,
therfore remember to constantly drink water. You wont loose weight if
you don't drink enough water (no salt, is important).
Since it sounds like you've just started riding, let me give you this
other tip, "At the begining and the end of your ride, make sure you
warm up and then cool down". At least 5 minutes on either side of your
ride. Without that you may be in for some real pain and suffering.
David (who lost 20 pounds when my wife went on Weight Watcher)
|
1700.11 | Wellness Center Tip | WECARE::PAMMER | | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:45 | 28 |
| THE most optimal way to reduce your body fat is to exercise at the
LOWER end of your training heart rate (THR) for an extended period of
time.
Generally speaking, your body uses two different kinds of fuel sources.
One is fat and the other is carbohydrates. The molecular bonds of fat
needs more oxygen in order for it to be combusted. Keeping your THR
between 50-75% of you max and keeping there for 30+ minutes is best to
burn the fat.
At the higher ends of your THR, your body tends to burn those carbos
that are easily combusted without much oxygen (your may be near
oxygen debt anyhow....;-) )
This whole principle can be proven if you've ever bonked. You ride
along, feeling snappy....then all of a sudden the world starts moving
in slow motion. What happened? Well, you've used up all your glycogen
(carbos) stores and now you need to slow way down in order to burn the
fat reserves. Since most of us aren't effecient at burning fat, this
is an unpleasant ride home.
I'm not saying to bonk all the time...it's unhealthy. Start
execising at the lower ends and work on increasing the DURATION rather
than the INTENSITY.
Jim
|
1700.12 | appetite up or down ? | GENRAL::ROOHR | | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:47 | 11 |
| Being someone who has gone from being nearly completely sedentary to
riding on a regular basis I've found my appetite decreasing. This
goes along with what I've read about the appetite control circuits (?)
in your brain not functioning correctly without excersize. So if you've
been fairly active and are taking up riding then you may see an
increase in appetite, if not you may see a decrease as I've
experienced.
One other good thing to note is you can eat like a starved pig and
still cut calories if you just cut out the fats, problem is you'd
be amazed at the fat present in foods you wouldnt guess is loaded
with it.
|
1700.13 | just for the record ... | TOOK::FAIRBANKS | | Fri Aug 17 1990 15:40 | 25 |
|
Hi again,
I feel compelled to say here that I am NOT trying to lose weight
simply by biking!! :-) I guess I didn't make myself clear in the
basenote.
I have already lost a substantial amount of weight and now am just
trying to tone up and get in shape.
My question was not "can I lose weight if I continue to pig out and
just ride my bike", but rather, "what is the most OPTIMAL way I can
ride my bike in terms of exercise and toning"?
Sorry I didn't make that clear. Thanks for all who have taken time
to reply; I think I got the answers I was looking for. Duration and
proper shifting are more important than killing myself for shorter
times trying to ride up hills--at least to meet my particular goals.
Laurie
p.s. Gee, I can see where y'all got the wrong idea, based on the
title I gave the base note!!!
:-)
|
1700.14 | ELEMENATRY WATSON... | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Tue Aug 21 1990 13:46 | 8 |
| Yes, you can loose weight... and maintain weight by cycling. It will
be like any other activity... effectivity and intensity go hand in
hand. What's better? -- What do you like best? How much time do
you have?
The equation is rudimentary... intake vs. output ratios......
Chip
|
1700.15 | Be careful on hills! | WFOVX8::SISE | | Tue Aug 28 1990 17:07 | 13 |
| Laurie,
Just a quick note on climbing hills. Don't push hard on hills,
or do any "hilly" rides until you have a solid milage base. I don't
do any hills until I have about 200 or so miles. I then start with
some small stuff, and work from there.
I have done Mt. Tom a few times after the 300 mile mark.
John
who_just_got_back_from_a_2_week_bikeless_vacation_and_has_to_start_over!
|