T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1698.1 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | One of them's got a gun | Wed Feb 19 1992 12:12 | 7 |
| Answer 1.
No I haven't, but I've often wondered how one would go about it myself
Answer 2.
Try Talking Pages 071 600 9000
|
1698.2 | HASSLE! | IRNBRU::WILSON | | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:14 | 13 |
| Take a photo of the offending hole and your damage, then notify the
council in writing of the incident, and your intention to seek
compensation. They will no doubt repair the damage to the road within a
day.
Also, things will be a great deal easier if you had someone in the car
with you at the time!...did you? If so, you have someone to support
your claim.
I know of someone who waited 5 months before the council paid out for his
tyre. You'll have to chase/hassle them constantly, but it can be done.
The question is do you really think it's worth all the hassle?
|
1698.3 | | PERKY::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:17 | 18 |
| >>Please point me at any existing topics that deal with the following.
>>....I'm sure you will!
Been there, done that. Try note 774 and its replies.
In my case, I wrote to the council, who ignored the letter.
When I phoned some time later to chase them up, they claimed
that since the road was not a primary route that it did not
need to be kept up to the standard of repair that applied to
major carriageways (or some phrase like that).
I didn't bother going further with my claim, perhaps I should have ?
BTW, the road was subsequently repaired.
J.R.
|
1698.4 | Try Halfords.. | BAHTAT::FRANZ | Chris Franz, Leeds, UK | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:30 | 4 |
| RE: Wheel replacement.
Halfords have quite a range of alloys, some of which are Wolfrace.
|
1698.5 | | UPROAR::EVANSG | Gwyn Evans @ IME - Open DECtrade | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:51 | 7 |
| It'd be worth a try, you could try the CAB if you get problems. Also,
don't forget that many house/car insurance schemes give you free access
to legal advice, so if your's does...
Before you tell the council, do as .2 said and take a photo, as
councils do tend to fill them in and disclaim knowledge of any such
thing!
|
1698.6 | Try it and see...... | COMICS::COOMBER | Inverted Flight Expert | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:11 | 27 |
| I think the answer is as a few back , HASSLE.......
I have had experiance of councils slope shouldering claims. They love
sloping it off to someone like a contractor who dug a hole or just turn
plain deaf. Experiance has shown that anyone concerned is always
looking for a scape goat, and definatly don't want to pay. The long and
the short of it , rightly or wrongly , is to try the council, if they
wear it great, but if they put up any resistance and the cost of
whatever got damaged is small, swallow the cost. It could cost a lot of
a lot of time money and heart ache to get a couple of hundred pounds
out of them.
Before anyone jumps down my neck, I don't agree with it and them the
B******DS should pay. If it were easy to get the money and not cost me
more that the price of a couple of phone calls or stamps,I would on the
case every time. But to consider suing a council for a new wheel that
costs a couple of hundred quid and possibly suffer finacial ruin is
just not worth the hassle.
Its not right , should not be the case, one should have recourse as
we all pay poll tax and road fund licences, but I personally don't have
the funds to fight a local government. Try it and see.
Garry
|
1698.7 | Hardly Guiness Affair expensive, is it? | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:19 | 6 |
|
Can't you take this kind of claim to the small claims court? They have
a modest, fixed fee for hearing cases and no(?) legal representation is
allowed.
Mark
|
1698.8 | | PERKY::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:20 | 16 |
| >> -< Try it and see...... >-
Definitely worth trying - do take a photo of the offending hole first.
>> the short of it , rightly or wrongly , is to try the council, if they
>> wear it great, but if they put up any resistance and the cost of
>> whatever got damaged is small, swallow the cost. It could cost a lot of
This is what I did. In my case, I ended up by paying for it myself.
If you do get any joy, please let us know.
Also, if you get a successful response in writing, could you
send a copy of the letter to me (John Rutter @SBP, F11.2) ?
J.R.
|
1698.9 | | PERKY::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:23 | 14 |
| >> -< Hardly Guiness Affair expensive, is it? >-
No, but I wouldn't want to take off the time required to chase it up.
Whether losing money as a [money-grabbing !] contractor ( ;-) )
or using up leave as a permie, buying the wheel may be cheaper.
Even so, write to the council and try to get a response.
Also check for tyre damage, and tracking if it's the front wheel.
BTW, what size wheel is it ?
J.R.
|
1698.10 | Small Claims. | BIS1::BHD161::HARRISON | | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:23 | 17 |
|
re: .6
Don't know about the chances of success, but it NEED not bring
financial ruin.
You can use the small claims procedure in the County Court, where
the procedures are less formal and costs are NOT awarded for the other
side's expensive lawyers even if they WIN.
Thus you outlay is limited.
Receiving a summons even the council may think it easier to settle.
Mike H.
|
1698.11 | Greedy contractors!!! :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:28 | 6 |
|
Ummm, I'm not sure, but I don't think you have to appear in the Small
claims court. I _believe_ you simply send in a description of the claim
and await the result.
Mark
|
1698.12 | | RDGE44::ALEUC2 | | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:42 | 8 |
| Another point to bear in mind; how do you prove that the damage was
caused by that pothole and not by driving up the pavement? (I'm not
saying that it wasn't the pothole that caused the problem but the
council may take that attitude.)
It's still worth the cost of a stamp though.
Barry.
|
1698.13 | Standard of proof. | BIS1::BHD161::HARRISON | | Wed Feb 19 1992 18:09 | 12 |
|
re: .12
The standard of proof required in civil procedings is "on the balance
of probabilities" NOT "beyond all reasonable doubt".
So if you say that it was so, can show that it easily could have been
so and the defendents can't show that you are likey to be wrong that
should satisfy the court.
Mike H.
|
1698.14 | Give it a go! | VOGON::DAWSON | Turn ignition on - Turn brain off! | Thu Feb 20 1992 08:59 | 20 |
| It's my experience that you DO have to appear in the Small Claims
Court but, as was previously stated, it is much more informal (a chat
over the table with you, him and the Beak) and no costs are brought to
bear.
We took our landlord (or rather, the agency letting the property
for him) to the SCC in Oxford for holding back some of our deposit
money when we departed for what we thought were unreasonably costs.
After several weeks of haggling with them we appeared in court, the
Beak asked if we had tried an out-of-court settlement, we said yes, he
said try again! and they coughed up (not quite what we were going for
but enough).
If they know you are serious they usually won't take it all the
way. Give it a try, I say. Even Councils have their responsibilities
and should take them seriously!
Good luck.
Colin
|
1698.15 | No way Josaie ! | SEDSWS::OXFORD | who's pulling my Pilsner | Thu Feb 20 1992 11:22 | 29 |
|
I've had the missfortune to go down a pothole and do damage to my car,
the story goes like this.
I took a photo of the hole (a big bug*er it was aswell), took a photo
of my front wheel (which had a big dent , a crack , and a bubbled
tyre), got the claim form from the council and sent it all off with the
estimate. The estimate came to #370 quid. The car needed a new front
wheel,tyre, new suspension arm, and the rear wheel had its dent knocked
out. (Escort RST b.t.w.).
I recieved various letters saying "your claim is being dealt with",
"it has been passed on to our insurers", etc etc. After about 6 weeks
i recieved a letter saying your claim has been rejcted......I was
fuming so i got straight on the phone to find out why.
They said that if the council can prove that they inspect the roads
regularly then the damage is due to unforseen circumstances which the
council can not be held responsible for. I asked them what "regular"
was, the reply was every 3 months. I asked when the road was last
inspected, they said 4 months ago, i said well thats it then, they havent
done their job, i want my money. They said , but we have recently had
bad weather (snow and ice) and the damage was probably due to that, and
the council have a backlog of holes to repair and cant do them all at
once, so your claim was thrown out. I carried on arguing with this
woman but didnt get anywhere so i gave up.
So i think its a waste of time the council having insurance because
with such a ridiculous set of rules they will never pay out.
So if you try i hope you have better luck than me.
Nick.
|
1698.16 | thanks so far, and praise for Micheldever Tyresn | KERNEL::ROE | Three Sixteen..Know what I mean John? | Thu Feb 20 1992 11:24 | 39 |
| Lots of helpful advice - many thanks.
I've taken photos of the hole and the damaged wheel, and once I get an idea of the costs of
repair/replacement, I'll contact the council. I'm not going to give myself ulcers trying to
win my case, but I will push them a bit! I'll post the results here.
I must say a few words about the service I've got from Micheldever Tyres....
It looks extremely unlikely that I'll get a direct replacement for the Wolfrace wheel.
I've tried several sources and it's usually the old sucking-through-teeth/shaking of head/
"you've got *no* chance, mate" sort of response! Not wanting to splash out for a set of 4
(must keep up appearances!) I thought of getting the wheel repaired.
ATS suggested a company in Reading - Shadow Racing - but I could find no number for them
....anybody know of them? Ralph Motors suggested Micheldever Tyres (you can always rely
on Ralphs!)
The approach to Customer Service at Micheldever is amazing!
. They were *interested* in my problem. Several people got involved in the discussion on
whether the wheel was repairable. It appears that Wolfrace are quite soft (no kidding!)
and therefore easier to put back in shape than most.
. They arranged for the wheel to be collected and repaired by an outfit called "Spit &
Polish"
. They will ring me when the wheel's ready.
. They advised me that it was illegal to continue to use the spacesaver wheel, as it is only
legal as an emergency spare to get you to a repair depot. (Question: can this be really
true? ) I shrugged, and said that I'd have to run the risk, as I had no option.
. They then, *and this was the most impressive part*, produced one of their own (used)
alloy wheels and loaned it to me until I get mine back!!! They asked me to go easy on the
tyre, as it belonged to one of the staff personally!
Maybe my expectations are cynically low, but this level of service is way and beyond anything
I would expect, and I will heartily recommend Micheldever Tyres to anyone in the future.
Sorry for the length of the reply, but I *am* impressed!
|
1698.17 | :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Go ahead, Punk. MAKE MY TEA!!!! | Thu Feb 20 1992 11:34 | 4 |
|
Does anyone have anything BUT praise for Micheldever?
Mark
|
1698.18 | Don't waste yout time | UKCSSE::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Mon Mar 02 1992 11:25 | 22 |
| Re .15
I had exactly the same experience with Hampshire County Council.
Hole at side of road, damaged wheel and tyre, photographic evidence
submitted with claim, exchange of many letters over 4 month period but
no compensation received etc.
Council rejected the claim saying as they did not know about the hole
they could not be held responsible and that said road had been
inspected 6 weeks prior and found to be up to standard.
It would appear that proving that the hole caused the damage is no
longer sufficient. You now have to prove that the council were
negligent by failing to maintain the road at the minimum standard. The
problem is that THEY set the standards!
The only way round the situation is to prove that the council knew about
the hole but failed to take remedial action.
Martin.
|
1698.19 | Longshot, but.... | VOGON::KAPPLER | Spontaneity is fine in it's place.... | Mon Mar 02 1992 12:20 | 6 |
| Try contacting the Parish Council. sometimes they notice holes and
report them to the county.
If they did, and if.... the dates fit, you may have a chance....
JK
|
1698.20 | Who about this??? | COMICS::COOMBER | Inverted Flight Expert | Mon Mar 02 1992 13:02 | 31 |
| On the same thing but a different angle.
At the moment my journey into work is through Hackney (london).
The Gas board are replacing miles of gas main. It appears that every
major contractor is involved in digging up the road and putting these
pipes in. The people digging the holes seem to have the logic a drunken
warthog. The roads are like a battlefield and the traffic is something
else. I don't understand how the council can let them dig holes so that
the road becomes an virtual maze . That to my way of thinking is down
to the council and for making a total mess. They allow the holes to be
dug ,any problems around that is there responibility. That problem is
mainly short lived. The real problem's will happen in 3-6 months time
when the road all starts to sink. The stupid idiots digging the holes
just fill them in with the junk they dug out and pop a bit of soft
tarmac on top. When the road is more like a rallycross course that a
road , because the contractor has not repaired the road properly, who's
fault is it?
My thinking on this is that the council are responsible. As I
understand things (right or wrong), the hole is licensed by the council.
During the time the road is up, the contractor is responsible for damage
etc related to the hole. When the job is complete, road surface
repaired. The council are entitled to call the contractor back to sort
the road out if the repair is not up to standard. On the assumption that
the council have ok'd the job, then any further problem related to the
road subsiding or whatever ,the council are liable for any damage caused
by that. Baring in mind that most people have said that it is basiclly a
waste of time , does anyone have any different view on that.
Garry
|
1698.21 | fascinating holes | ROCKS::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:17 | 17 |
| The utility that dug the hole are responsible for re-instatement and
maintenance for a period of about 6 months. (This is to allow for
settlement) After this period responsibility returns to the council.
Any complaints should be directed initially to the council and they
sort who is responsible, ie Gas, Telecom, Water etc.
It may not seem like it but the councils do have restrictions on when
roads can be dug up. ie only emergency works are authorized in the 6
month period following re-surfacing. Most utilities try to work
together these days when laying new mains. It's cheaper for them if
they can share the cost of digging a trench and laying pipes and cables
at the same time.
And the source of these fascinating revelations - a relation who works
for the Gas board department that is responsible for digging holes in
the road!
|