T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1552.1 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Wed Sep 18 1991 14:46 | 4 |
|
In the UK (and probably most places in Europe), it is illegal.
Mark
|
1552.2 | | VOGON::ATWAL | I _am_ a hairdresser... | Wed Sep 18 1991 14:56 | 7 |
| >> An expensive way of telling other motorists what a tosser you are.
why is it?
...art
|
1552.3 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I'm not from Bushey | Wed Sep 18 1991 15:11 | 4 |
| It is somewhat pretentious!
Ian
|
1552.4 | | SWEEP::PREECE | Dances-with-Wombats. | Wed Sep 18 1991 18:29 | 7 |
|
"Not only am I rich enough to afford this, I'm rich enough not to take it
seriously"
.. HHGTG, Douglas Adams
|
1552.5 | LSB 9 | PLAYER::BROWNL | Issix Man has discovered Suffolk | Thu Sep 19 1991 09:16 | 8 |
| Fancy that! All these years and I hadn't realised what a tosser I was.
Well, well, well.
Better not let the EF91 crew find this out....
What a load of twaddle.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
1552.6 | | SBPUS4::MARK | I missed F the FF | Thu Sep 19 1991 10:25 | 4 |
| > Fancy that! All these years and I hadn't realised what a tosser I was.
> Well, well, well.
You should have I asked me, I'd have help increase your perception.
|
1552.7 | TOS 53R | WARHED::GILLILAND | | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:01 | 12 |
| > In the UK (and probably most places in Europe), it is illegal.
So why is this so obviously ignored by the authorities? I can't think
of any other clearly-visible motoring offences that have a blind eye
turned to them. I agree that there is not a safety issue involved, but
neither is a noisy exhaust or a silly horn that plays a tune unsafe;
they will still get you your collar felt by Mr Plod, presumably because
they cam cause `distress to others'. Well I find personalized number
plates very distressing: distressing that there are such tossers in the
world.
Phil Gill.
|
1552.8 | Personalised Registration <> Snob | RDGE44::ORCHARD_9 | You can lead me to a drink, but water maker me hoarse | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:07 | 17 |
| It's not always snob value. Nowadays, when you can pick up a
'personalised' registration for less than �200, it's just another way
of making your car different from all the others. The same way that
people stick on 'go faster' stripes and chrome wheeltrims, etc.
Laurie's number is more of an investment (isn't it, LSB :-), and a way
of making his sprogeye a little more 'special'.
Now, I've just recently bought H10 RCH (to be read as HI ORCH), but the
only vehicle that I can put it on is my motorbike, which would make it
read: H10
RCH
So, what does that make me ?? (No need to comment, I already know) :-)
Tony 'The Wimp' Orchard
|
1552.9 | fact * 0.9 | HEAVY::LAW | Mathew Law, SIE (Reading, UK) | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:36 | 11 |
|
> turned to them. I agree that there is not a safety issue involved, but
> neither is a noisy exhaust or a silly horn that plays a tune unsafe;
I think that tune-playing horns were originally banned to prevent
people from having horns that sounded like police cars, ambulances, and
so on. Of course, with the more recent sirens there is no longer a
chance of confusion.
Mat.
*:o)
|
1552.10 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Sep 19 1991 11:37 | 7 |
|
I guess that, although illegal, number plates which look like words are
a lot easier to remember than legally spaced plates.
Maybe the police figure that it'd be counter-productive to prosecute?
Mark
|
1552.11 | Drive like a granny? Then this doesn't apply | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:26 | 23 |
| re .10
I agree, if it makes the car stand out more to the public then it
sure as hell will attract more police attention. That reason alone
would deter me from buying a pers. plate. The way I drive, I can do
without anymore police attention than I probably already get. Also, if
a copper was to see you driving badly/too fast or whatever, but wasn't
in a position to nick you at the time ie, off duty, chasing someone
else, going the wrong way down the road etc, he may remember the plate
and if he saw it again, may nick you even though you aren't doing
anything *that* bad, or even not let you off 'cos he remebered your
plate.
Another reason as well : if you have a slight disagreement with
someone whilst driving along or whatever, said person for all you know
may be going to the same place as you and arrive after you. They may
decide to run a key along the paintwork or something even nastier.
Nah, you can keep your personalised plates. I wouldn't go as far to
say those with them are tossers though. Nevertheless, don't cut me up,
'cos I might be going where you are ! >-)
Jerome who doesn't like unwanted attention.
|
1552.12 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I'm not from Bushey | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:11 | 8 |
| Dunno whether this should go here or in seen in passing, but
I saw an old shape BMW 3-series with a J plate, and the other
day I saw a Sierra with an A plate. An old A plate that is!!!
How can this be??
Ian
|
1552.13 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | On the bank of brinkruptcy | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:17 | 9 |
| �An old A plate that is!!! How can this be??
As I understand it you cannot have a newer plate on an older car but
there is no law against having an older plate on your car.
Just because it has a year letter on it does not preclude it from being
a personal or "cherished" plate.
Roy
|
1552.14 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs & some nuts. | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:25 | 7 |
| � I saw an old shape BMW 3-series with a J plate...
Ian, you can see one almost every day if you take a squint through the
window! Mr Osmond's convertible is usually in the Viables car park,
when it's not parked round the back of McDonalds!
McWegg�
|
1552.15 | or...... | COMICS::COOMBER | Inverted Flight Expert | Thu Sep 19 1991 14:18 | 7 |
| And of course if a car is officailly written off and then re-registered
it get the current plate , os you could have a Mk 1 cortina with a J
plate. That is unless the rules have changed, but it used to be
possible.
Garry
|
1552.16 | | WOTVAX::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Thu Sep 19 1991 17:33 | 5 |
| RE -1
Nope rules have changed! You will now end up with the dreded 'Q'
plate. That BMW sounds a bit dodgy!!
..Craig
|
1552.17 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs & some nuts. | Thu Sep 19 1991 17:50 | 3 |
| The BMW's OK, assuming it's never been registered before.
Ian.
|
1552.18 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | On the bank of brinkruptcy | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:03 | 9 |
| Its quite common to see discontinued models with later regs than you'd
think. As Ian mentioned if a car has never been registered before it
will get the latest reg.
Theoretically if a Ford dealer discovered an unregistered Capri tucked
away at the back of his showroom it could be registered with a 'J'
plate. That would make you look twice :-)
Roy.
|
1552.19 | Like the Golf Cabrio | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:15 | 2 |
| I believe the BMW is a current model, even though it's the "old shape".
BMW still make the Cabrio as a new shape one isn't available.
|
1552.20 | my dad use use to do that....give 'im a job.. | ODDONE::BELL_A1 | | Thu Sep 19 1991 19:16 | 22 |
|
re .16
according to HM customs and excise a Q-plate is only valid for 9
months. The car should be 'properly' registered if
a) the vehicle will reside on mainland UK for longer than 9 months
b) the vehicle has been on mainland UK for 9 or more months.
when registering a vehicle 2 things can happen. If you can provide
documented evidence of when the car was manufactured it will get the
appropriate mark, ie. J if 1991/2, H if 1990/1 etc...
or
If the apprpriate documentation can not be provided the car will get
the current mark, ie 1991/2 J. but the LVLA (local vehicle licensing
authority) will rubber stamp the registration using red ink with the
words NOT NEW WHEN FIRST REGISTERED.
Alan
* this was the practise when my father retired from our LVLA, which is
situated in minster street (Reading).
|
1552.21 | Hmmmm ?-| | DCOPST::BRIANH::NAYLOR | Tigers fly, Spiders roar! | Thu Sep 19 1991 19:31 | 13 |
| Here's an interesting question prompted by this note.
My Alfa is an "85 model" but the current registration document is dated
September 1990. This was when it was registered in Maryland. Now, should
I bring the Alfa to the UK, one of 3 things could happen to it...
1. I could get an "H" as the registration shows 9/90
2. I could get a "C" for December 85, when it was imported to the US
3. ?????
What are the panels opnions on 3 above?
Brian
|
1552.22 | | WOTVAX::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Fri Sep 20 1991 09:12 | 16 |
| re .20
I imported a car from the Isle of Man about three weeks ago and tried very
hard to get a new 'J' reg. I was told more than once by my LVLA that
this is not possible. If you cannot prove the date of manufacture you
will get a 'Q', and apparantly this is for life! If you can prove DOM
then you will get the appropriate prefix letter reg.
This is all acording to the LVLA in Manchester.
re .21
When was it first registered?
Has your car been registered in the UK before?
..Craig
|
1552.23 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs & some nuts. | Fri Sep 20 1991 10:08 | 17 |
| Re .20
� according to HM customs and excise a Q-plate is only valid for 9
� months.
� If the apprpriate documentation can not be provided the car will get
� the current mark, ie 1991/2 J.
NO! This did use to be the case, in fact I used to own an ex-army
Landrover that was 15 years older than its M reg plate. But things
changed some time ago, there is no way now of getting a plate that
is newer than the car.
It occurred to me this morning, though. Will the 'dreaded' Q plate
become more sort after in a few years time? In 1997, will people be
clamouring to trade in their P regs motors for a kit car?
Ian.
|
1552.24 | Swap this Mini for a Mantula? Certainly! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Fri Sep 20 1991 10:19 | 7 |
|
Some people want to trade their cars for kits now! :^)
Of course, as most of you already know, you cannot transfer a Q plate
onto a car which has carried a normal plate.
Mark
|
1552.25 | | DCOPST::BRIANH::NAYLOR | Tigers fly, Spiders roar! | Fri Sep 20 1991 15:44 | 2 |
| Re .22 First registered in Massachussetts in Decmeber 1985
Never been in the UK.
|
1552.26 | | WOTVAX::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Mon Sep 23 1991 12:36 | 8 |
| re -1 First registered in Massachussetts in Decmeber 1985
If this date is on the log book (registration document), when you come
to re-register it in the UK it will get a 'C' plate.
..Craig
|
1552.27 | | DCOPST::BRIANH::NAYLOR | Tigers fly, Spiders roar! | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:18 | 7 |
| > If this date is on the log book (registration document), when you come
> to re-register it in the UK it will get a 'C' plate.
My point is, that the CURRENT resgistration document shows September 1990, but
that isn't the date the car was first registered. When you move states in the
US, you get a new document from the new state .....
|
1552.28 | | WOTVAX::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:28 | 10 |
| re -1
Well in your case I think you'd probably get away with a 'G' plate.
Unfortunately with most cars this isn't so.
..Craig
PS I know with some imports the car must go through a customs clearance
before you can re-register - I don't know what happens in this
procedure.
|
1552.29 | personal experience, but the rules may have changed | LARVAE::CLEMENTS_D | | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:00 | 18 |
| re last replies.
I imported a Capri to the UK when I returned home from the US in '78
The car was new when I bought it in Tennessee and when it arrived in
the UK it was almost 5 years old. When I got around to registering it
(after a reminder from the Excise bods!) I got a registration plate
that was the current UK year plate. So YRO 555S was a '73 Capri weraing
a '78 plate. I had to get it MoT'd before the new registration was
issued and that's another story........ The registration document was
marked up as "Not new when imported" and because I didn't pay import
duty (and VAT) when it arrived at Southampton, there was also the
caveat written ont toe registartion that the vehicle couldn't change
hands for two years without the duty payable at the original assessment
on import. When that two year period expired, I could have got
another registration document without duty clause but didn't bother.
There weren't any problems when I sold the car after another 5 years
of happy ownership.
|
1552.30 | | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Cadbury's Liquer... what ???! | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:20 | 54 |
| Over here in Northern Ireland it is possible to import a car and
reregister it with whatever the latest reg prefix is. I bought my
imported Escort RS Turbo from England with an F reg on it and
reregistered it to get the latest no, over here. It's quite good cos
quite a few peeps have thought it was brand new, even though its got
30K on the clock.
Our reg numbers are different over here and do not have a letter prefix
which denotes the year, altough it is possible to deduce what year it
is by considering the letters (if it has not been reregistered of
course). My new reg is UXI 6057. I did have a Fiesta with VIA 2345,
and I am begining to wish I had kept that number :-(
I believe that one of the reasons that we are allowed to reregister our
cars so easily is for security reasons, ie. members of the security
forces changing theirs regularly to avoid being targeted by terrorists.
I bought an XR2 which had been owned by a Policeman with about 4500
miles on the clock, and he had reregistered the car twice. Perhaps he
was just trying to get a nice number :-)
I was only 3 away from being allocated UXI 6060 which would have been
quite nice in comarison to 6057 :-(
When I reregistered my machine I decided to get some slightly more
attractive number plates. They have smaller letters/digits and are
slightly slanted (italic). I have had these plates on for about 7
months now and about four weeks ago was stopped by Mr. Plod at a Police
check who proceeded to tell me that my plates were illegal after
measuring them with a ruler, which he produced from about his person.
He took down all my details and said he was taking me to court over
it.... I then contacted my local Police station who said that if the
officer had not asked me to produce my insurance, then it is v.
unlikely that matters will be taken any further, saying that it was
such a trivial offence anyway. I showed him a cpic of the plates on the
car, and he agreed that he had seen much worse. I wonder if me pointing
out a car that had only one headlight working, but yet was waved
through without a word to the driver, had anything to do with me
getting off ?? :-) I just had to point out that it should be the same
law for everyone, and not just those driving "performance" cars, which the
Police seem to loath over here. Have been through loads of checks
before and after this incident without a word from the Police.
The plates remain on the car, as I think they look jolly good and are
very legible. The letters are 62 mm high, and according to Trafic
Police they should be between 80 and 88 mm. I was told at the "scene of
the crime" that they MUST be 88mm high, and to look at the reg on the
Police car. I am not joking when I say that they were bloody lucky that
they actually fitted on the plate at all, they were that big. Traffic
plod also said that it was illegal to have dots on the letter i which a
lot of peeps have over here, and that it was strictly true that it was
illegal to wave any writing like that of the dealer name on the plate
at the bottom, like nearly all have. If you have 88mm high letters,
which I doubt, then there is no room for this anyway :-)
Gary.
|
1552.31 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Oct 02 1991 12:51 | 4 |
|
Registration for imported cars has changed quite a bit since 78.
Heather
|
1552.32 | What part of the country is it from ?? | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Regard this simple salt cellar ... | Wed Oct 02 1991 13:38 | 6 |
| Heather, are you from Devon? (as in "The Devon Dumpling") because my
previous reg was F124 ODV. Does the DV dit mean Devon or what ?? I
don't really know where my car came from in England, except that it was
a Ford manager's fleet mobile.
Gary.
|
1552.33 | I'm not Heather, but hust some added value... | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | On the bank of brinkruptcy | Wed Oct 02 1991 14:34 | 10 |
| The "DV" part of the number certainly represents the area that it was
registered, but the letters are in no way an abbreviation. I don't know
where DV is but I'm sure someone will enlighten us.
Just a footnote: I notice that in the southampton/portsmouth area one
of the local letter combinations is "BP". Consequently a lot cars have
the reg "annn SBP" which is interesting because the Solent office
address is @SBP !
Roy.
|
1552.34 | Pronounced Lowest toft | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:14 | 15 |
| I noticed that in the Lowestoft, Suffolk area there were a large
number of reg.'s with a "V" either in the middle or the end of
cars registered there. ie A123 BVG or A123 FDV. I think that
the reg of a car used to easily distinguish the area that it came
from, but nowadays this is not always the case. There are too many
cars bought these days to have a small amount of sequences to mark
out one area and also, when cars change hands they tend to move
around quite a bit, which dilutes the concentration in any one area.
I had great fun proving what a clever boy I was for noticing the
very numerous occurances of the "V" in Lowestoft plates on a weekend
trip there by pointing every single one out to my passengers. I was
lucky to make it back alive. :-)
Jerome the Observant.
|
1552.35 | The Return of "V" coming to Lowestoft soon... | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Regard this simple salt cellar ... | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:27 | 4 |
| Thanks Jerome. Pronounced Lowest toft eh ??
Hmmm is that good or bad :^)
Gary.
|
1552.36 | TF rules in Reading | VOGON::NUTLEY | | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:34 | 5 |
| Not that number plates are my favourite subject.... but in the Berkshire
region the commonest 'plate' ends in 'TF'.
Roy (H606 GTF)
|
1552.37 | SBP = Solent Business Park | ALBURT::LEWIS | | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:43 | 3 |
| -2. The reason the Solent (Fareham) office has the code SBP is because
of the name of the business park that the office is in. I.E. Solent
Business Park.
|
1552.38 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | On the bank of brinkruptcy | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:06 | 8 |
| Rathole alert.
Is there a formula for working out DEC area names.
ie SBP = solent bus. park.
I work at Viables (UVO), I assume that the V is for Viables but what
about the rest of it ?
Roy.
|
1552.39 | I am from Devon, but DV??? | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:25 | 6 |
|
Yup, I'm from Devon, Plymouth to be precise.
DR was a common suffix, as is NF, but Dv doesn't ring any bells.
Heather
|
1552.40 | and another irrelevant point... | SBPUS4::MARK | I missed F the FF | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:28 | 2 |
|
& TT
|
1552.41 | FWIW | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ballooning over Berkshire | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:08 | 9 |
| DR,DV,TT are all from EXETER
NF is from Manchester
Just to keep this going a bit longer ...
Other Exeter reg's are CO,FJ,JY,OD,TA,TK,UN,UO
David (part time number plate watcher)
|
1552.42 | | SHAWB1::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:44 | 1 |
| Does anyone have a list of these things??
|
1552.43 | | SBPUS4::MARK | I missed F the FF | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:46 | 2 |
|
the front of the Glasses (sp?) Guide always used to.
|
1552.44 | The I-SPY book of cars used to list 'em all
| BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:16 | 0 |
1552.45 | So did the AA handbooks | DOOZER::JENKINS | Pschorrly 'ken shabby | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:37 | 1 |
|
|
1552.46 | So there ain't one on notes then? | SHAWB1::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:43 | 1 |
|
|
1552.47 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:51 | 4 |
|
Yes, it's somewhere in EURO_MOTORING.
Mark
|
1552.48 | J reg 2 door BMW | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:23 | 5 |
| BMW are still producing the 'old' shape 3 series in the 2 door variant,
until next March, when the 2 door new shape (4 series ?) is available
in the UK. Hence the 'J' reg.
Pete
|
1552.49 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I'm not from Bushey | Tue Oct 08 1991 14:44 | 5 |
| That probably explains why I saw another old shape J reg 325i
yesterday!
ian
|
1552.50 | | IEDUX::jon | I'm in an Ealing comedy | Tue Oct 08 1991 19:01 | 11 |
| Re the rathole in .38 which nobody went down:
> I work at Viables (UVO), I assume that the V is for Viables but what
> about the rest of it ?
I don't know what the 'U' stands for but I understand the 'O' stands
for 'office'. Site codes used to be two letters and when they started
running out, three letter ones came in with most two letter ones
extended to three by adding an 'O' for Office.
Jon from REO = Reading Office = DECpark
|
1552.51 | No O for Office | DCOPST::BRIANH::NAYLOR | Tigers fly, Spiders roar! | Tue Oct 08 1991 20:34 | 9 |
| The O was not added to mean "office", it was simply used to extend the acronyms
to three letters from two because, as was correctly stated, the two-letter ones
became used up. So, all the "old" locations that existed before the change have
an O on the end, and the newer locations may have another letter in the third
position. And no, "O" does not stand for "Old" :^)
This all ahppened about 10 years ago if my faltering memory still serves me well
Brian
|
1552.52 | Locations may or may not mean anything. | HEWIE::RUSSELL | Hari Krishna, Hari Ramsden, Hari Hari | Tue Oct 08 1991 20:57 | 11 |
| The locations just get assigned from 'somewhere'; for example, the Crescent
was (and will become again, I guess) UCG. SBP was gonna become UCH, until
"someone" got it changed to SBP.
Sometimes they mean something, and often they don't.
After all, XIP is Lisbon!
Peter.
|
1552.53 | TLA stands for...... | VOGON::KAPPLER | but I manage ... | Wed Oct 09 1991 15:26 | 8 |
| And TLA is Bangkok.
No, *really*!
JK
p.s. It's in ThaiLAnd
|