T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1479.1 | | NSDC::SIMPSON | | Tue Jun 25 1991 20:26 | 2 |
| When my mother-in-law's R4 showed similar symptoms, it turned out to be a
warped block - could that be the problem?
|
1479.2 | | AEOEN2::MATTHEWS | In a negative brownie-point situation ... | Wed Jun 26 1991 10:19 | 10 |
| The R4 engine has a dry liner system i.e. the pistons run up and down
inside tubes which are not a part of the block. If you take the head off
you need to make sure that the tubes don't move, so you mustn't move the
pistons up and down.
The differences in compression you mention aren't too bad really, and
certainly wouldn't cause the problem you mentioned.
Why did they suspect the cam-shaft ??? If the lobes are worn, maybe it
isn't lifting the valves enough to let in enough fuel/air mixture.
|
1479.3 | Keep on talking, I'm getting ideas | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Thu Jun 27 1991 15:15 | 10 |
| The camshaft lobes aren't worn because the followers hardly show a
mark on them. Two people have just told me that it's probably due
to the piston rings, so I'll have to check this further. Can the
piston rings be changed without removing the engine on an R4?
I also learned that I didn't check the compression carefully enough.
I checked it by taking one plug out at a time, then running the engine
on three cylinders while holding the gauge over the open plughole.
Regards, Geoff.
|
1479.4 | | AEOEN2::MATTHEWS | In a negative brownie-point situation ... | Thu Jun 27 1991 16:07 | 5 |
| It's always best to test compression will all the plugs out. In that way
if the head gasket has gone, you'll see it better.
Just because the followers aren't worn, doesn't meant that the cam-shaft
can't be.
|
1479.5 | The motor's back together, but... | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Mon Jul 15 1991 18:23 | 27 |
| My son and I finally managed to get the motor back together again.
We did a full cylinder-head job on it, so compression is now very
good. There's a new water-pump and the carburettor's all clean,
new plugs, belts and filters.
We still have the problem of loss of power. The engine revs up
to a certain speed, then just stays there, not really misfiring,
but not running smoothly either. The car displays little power
on the road and climbing even light slopes causes it to slow down.
We've timed the distribution carefully and double checked
everything. Healthy sparks on all plugs except one.
Things we suspect, but need some verification:
Plug leads
Distributor cap or rotor arm
Mechanical timing advance (the cam is a bit loose)
Contact breaker (although they're really clean)
Capacitor
My impression is that it is timing, but my worry is that it's
something more serious.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards, Geoff.
|
1479.6 | | NCEIS1::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995 | Mon Jul 15 1991 18:26 | 10 |
| .5� Things we suspect, but need some verification:
.5�
.5� Plug leads
.5� Distributor cap or rotor arm
.5�===> Mechanical timing advance (the cam is a bit loose)
.5� Contact breaker (although they're really clean)
.5� Capacitor
I would strongly suspect the timing advance.
Check the carb for any possible air leak.
|
1479.7 | Just as thought | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An amateur expert | Tue Jul 16 1991 10:58 | 4 |
| I once had this a long long time ago on my dad's old Wolsely 15/60.
Tried everything, before eventually finding it was the COIL!!!
Richard
|
1479.8 | Additional info... | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Tue Jul 16 1991 11:25 | 4 |
| The plugs are still very oily and sooty, even though the gasket and
head job was done. I'm back to suspecting the rings again.
I'll check the coil though. Regards, Geoff.
|
1479.9 | | AEOEN1::MATTHEWS | In a negative brownie-point situation ... | Tue Jul 16 1991 16:40 | 2 |
| Sounds like the mixture is too rich. Suppose the air filter isn't
blocked is it, or the carb is just naff ...
|
1479.10 | Timing curve or compression.... | WARNUT::RICE | Car lease ripoff victim | Wed Jul 17 1991 13:58 | 15 |
| > Plug leads
> Distributor cap or rotor arm
> Mechanical timing advance (the cam is a bit loose)
> Contact breaker (although they're really clean)
> Capacitor
I think you'll just have to work throught the list - it looks about
the right things to check. Personally I'd check the timing first (worn
cam drive ? Static timing and with a strobe - does it just have
bob-weights or a vacuum advance as well ?). Then maybe the coil and/or
capacitor as well.
.Stevie.
|
1479.11 | Meanwhile, back in a Valbonne garage one month later... | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:48 | 18 |
| After one month, I'm still no nearer fixing this. Patrick Chevaux's advice
about timing is what I'm betting it is, but this means taking the engine out
as the R4's timing cover is inaccessible. Blow-back from the carburettor also
reinforces this. I'm still trying to eliminate obvious things. Therefore one
last question before the engine comes out:
How do you check a coil?
All plugs produce a spark, which I would call fairly healthy, but still I
want to check it, just in case.
The timing is single chain driven - can chains slip a sprocket tooth easily?
I can't imagine the camshaft is twisted, but then the poor thing does have:
oil-pump, distributor, push-rods, alternator, water-pump and fan to drive.
Regards, Geoff
(who-thought-he-got-a-smart-little-bargain-but-is-now-fearing-the-worst).
|
1479.12 | Well we found the problem... | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Mon Sep 09 1991 18:21 | 27 |
|
We finally managed to get the timing cover off by loosening the
engine mounting bolts then jacking the engine up about 5� to lift
it clear of the chassis.
Space was still restricted and with the aid of a mirror and torch
we checked the sprocket alignment and it WAS OUT by a couple of
teeth. By pushing the tensioner over, we were able to remove the
chain altogether by slipping it over the sprockets.
After aligning correctly, the engine works okay now! Hooray!!
Now for some questions, because if the chain slipped once, then it
may slip again... and in my lifetime, or even dinnertime:
- Should a new chain be able to be mounted by just slipping it
over the sprockets, or isn't this the usual way?
- I think the sprocket tooth jump was caused by the water-pump
seizing. Can I reasonably expect this to not happen again
if a new pump has been fitted.
- Would changing the tensioner help?
Thanks for all your help up to now.
Regards, Geoff.
|
1479.13 | | AEOEN2::MATTHEWS | In a negative brownie-point situation ... | Tue Sep 10 1991 08:53 | 6 |
| The normal way to fit the chain is to remove one of the gear wheels.
If the chain can be removed without doing this, I would suspect that
either it has stretched or the teeth on the gear wheels are worn down.
A new chain and gear wheels shouldn't cost too much.
|
1479.14 | To close this topic... | IDEFIX::GEOFF | Once more unto the beach, dear friends! | Tue Sep 24 1991 19:18 | 14 |
|
Thanks for all the good info guys. I bought a new chain and found
quite a difference in the length (about 10mm). I had to fabricate
a special extractor to get the sprocket off in the limited space
but I finally managed to extract it, put on the new chain and push
it back on with the aid of a furniture clamp. Runs a treat now!
It was fun, but I wouldn't want to do it again.
Regards, Geoff.
PS: Anyone wanna buy a R4L?? {8o]}
|