T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1310.1 | NCB? | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Wed Dec 05 1990 11:15 | 6 |
| If you have to claim off your own insurance, you *may* lose your
No Claims Bonus.
Be careful.
- Roy
|
1310.2 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Dec 05 1990 11:39 | 16 |
|
The cost of the lockset, and fitting, is �150, if I claim , and loose,
and as this is a different claim from the damage to the car, not
only would I loose the no-claims, but also have to pay the �50 excess.
Heads you win, tails I loose.
I have made a few more calls. My insurers are Royal Insurance, their
insurers are Royal insurance.
What bets on us both loosing no-claims, and both paying excess!!!!!
Heather
Who has never failed to wonder at the ingenuity of insurance companys to
excape payment.
|
1310.3 | | NEWOA::VANDIK::HENNEMAN | Reality? - not today thanks | Wed Dec 05 1990 11:47 | 18 |
| Heather
Although I've never had a garage lose my keys whilst my car was in their care
(OK lose=stolen, but basically you had followed the garage's procedure for
handing over car keys), I've had my car damaged whilst it was in for repair, and
that's pretty much the same thing. There was no question of my (Digital's)
insurance being involved, and the garage fixed everything and gave me a free
hire car as well.
I would say that they are trying to by difficult, and if they persist, you
could try contacting the SMMT, or whatever they are called these days. CAB might
also be able to help.
In my book, it's their problem, and they should pay in full + reimburse you for
any inconvenience caused. Whether they want to claim the cost off their
insurance is really no concern of yours.
Dick
|
1310.4 | Sue & be whatsnamed !! | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:26 | 16 |
| The car was in their care and custody, they have a common law duty of
care towards your property.
Go back, be firm and tell them that they must replace your lock set as
promised free of charge. You don't care whether it comes from their
insurance or not - how they pay for it is their problem. If they are
still difficult tell them you will get the repair done and sue them for
the cost, a sum over which you have no control !! and see what they say
to that.
If you still aren't winning, remove yourself from premises and come up
and see/phone me in REO F2 and we see if we can help.
Was this a lease car - I assume not, is it a garage/repairer we know ??
Doug
|
1310.5 | Thanks Doug | VOGON::MORGAN | Physically Phffftt | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:28 | 7 |
| As one of the mods of this conference may I thank Doug for replying to
this topic.
Doug is part of the U.K. insurance group.
Rich
|
1310.6 | Failing the fine offers from fellow noters... | MCGRUE::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:40 | 3 |
| ... I have the 12 bore you were asking for.
Simon (who now has a laser sight at his desk as well for double accuracy)
|
1310.7 | | CURRNT::SIMSA | Adrian : EIS/ADG (7) 782 2835 | Wed Dec 05 1990 12:43 | 17 |
|
I believe that it all depends on if the garage took reasonable steps to
secure your car and keys while in there procession.
I had a car stolen from a garage while it was it for repairs, and like
yourself I thought the garage would be liable, but this was NOT the
case, and my insurance company paid for the lose. The reason due to the
garage having locked the car in a compound overnight.
I would recommend that you talked to your insurance claims dept ,and
not the broker as they know little.
If your insurance is liable, I would try and get the garage to give you a
good-will claim.
Good luck
|
1310.8 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Dec 05 1990 15:18 | 39 |
|
Thanks for all your replies,
It's not a lease car, I take the money, and look after myself
(is this an advert for lease cars?????).
I got back to my broker, and have a phone number, and ref. number in
Royal Insurance, and they have said thay will talk with the garage
or their insurers about this situation.
I went back to Ruskins, who have taken this info, and will get back to
their insurers.
From what I can gather, both their insurers are trying to duck the
situation, and Ruskins have been told:
if the car was stolen, or damaged, then their car/traders insurance
would have covered it with no problem, but as it was the keys, stolen
from the office, they can't claim against the car/traders insurance.
So, they tried to claim from their business/liability/contents type
insurance, and were told that they wouldn't pay out, and I had to go
through my insurers, who would then contact them.
The garage are also a little puzzled. I am trying to be as helpful
as my impatience will let me.
As they have now actually got the lock-set, I'd have thought that
it would be a good practise to fit it, and either get their insurance
to pay, or write it off......too simple I suppose.
I have told the garage that I will call them back tomorrow, and will
expect them to have resolved their situation.
Doug, if I can't get this sorted, I may come up for some advice,
I'll let you know what happens.
Heather
|
1310.9 | | MCGRUE::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Wed Dec 05 1990 17:10 | 1 |
| Shall I bring the 12 gauge in?
|
1310.10 | Nah, it'll only handle 25 amps. Heather's a lot more charged up than that! | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Wed Dec 05 1990 20:04 | 1 |
|
|
1310.11 | Why not new keys. | OVAL::GROOMN | BOY - it's HOT | Thu Dec 06 1990 08:57 | 9 |
|
Heather, couldn't they just get the key no. from ARG by giving
them the chassis number. I lost a set of keys from a friend's 10-year
old Maestro, went along to Ruskins with the chassis no. who sent it off
to ARG. New keys were available after 48hrs. Cost �1.50 per
key. This was only 4 weeks ago.
Neville.
|
1310.12 | | MCGRUE::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Thu Dec 06 1990 09:03 | 3 |
| Because the car reg number was with the keys and is now known to the thief.
Simon
|
1310.13 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Dec 06 1990 09:47 | 16 |
|
Thanks simon, they also know my name.........it's lucky I'm
ex-directory, there's only 5 H Thomas's in Reading, they could have
found my house quite easily.
It's not difficult now, all they have to do is give the number and
name to Swansea, and they'll tell them my address.
I do need that new lock-set.
(apart from the fact they messed up my central locking when the
garage got into my car!)
Update later.
Heather
|
1310.14 | And they all lived happily ever after ? | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Tue Dec 11 1990 12:25 | 5 |
| Heather,
Are you yet able to close this loop with a happy ending ?
Doug
|
1310.15 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Dec 11 1990 13:36 | 31 |
|
Yes, in the fact that I don't have to pay anything extra, no, in the
fact that I think the solution is messy, and not a "real" solution.
As both the garage, and myself, are insured with Royal Insurance, David
Ruskin phoned them up to sort out how they wanted to deal with the
paperwork.
Solution: have the work done, and put the job through on the claim
number used for doing the work on my back bumper.
So, I don't have to fill in another claim, it isn't treated as another
claim, so won't affect my no-claims bonus and I don't have to pay
another �50 excess. It is being treated as part of the accident that
happened when an unknown reversed into my car in July.
The car is in for the new lockset today, and I have a replacement car,
they will phone me up this afternoon when my car is ready to be picked
up.
I hope things are OK, I'll check they haven't scratched my paintwork in
the process, and they've remembered the petrolcap lock too.
So, a rather strange compromise.
Thanks for the advice and offers of help, it should be all completed
by this evening.
Heather
|
1310.16 | T..Y..P..I..C..A..L... | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Tue Dec 11 1990 15:03 | 11 |
| I suppose someone thinks they've come up with the magical solution but
end of the day, customer, you , gets a claim on her record which you
think cost, say �200 for a bumper, in fact cost, say �300 for their
mistake.
If only they had bitten the bullet of what is a customer satisfaction
issue rather than an insurance issue in the first place.
As you say Heather, you got a result but a messy one.
D
|
1310.17 | Garages have never heard of Customer Service! | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Dec 12 1990 11:31 | 22 |
| Well, I was too optimistic.
Firstly, even after taking my phone number for the Nth time, they
didn't call me when the car was ready.
So, I phoned up, and they assured me the car was fine.
When I went to pick it up, one of the keys didn't work, and neither
did the central-locking.
I refused to sign for the work, and demanded to keep the car they had
given me (Nissan Micra, I must be mad, who would demand that!!!) until
my car was fixed.
After a heated argument, with me going through all the points in front
of customers picking up their vehicles, they decided to shut me up,
and let me keep the Nissan.
They say it will be ready this evening, don't hold your breath.
Heather
|
1310.18 | one day I'll get REALLY mad | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Dec 13 1990 09:42 | 53 |
|
> They say it will be ready this evening, don't hold your breath.
Well, the central locking was fixed.
Now, the security coded radio doesn't work.
I didn't have the code, as Penta never gave it to me. Ruskins said
last night, that they needed the serial number of the radio, then they
could phone up, and get the code and let me know today.
Now, the sticker on the car, which warns people the radio is security
coded, is on the drivers window, its 3 inches above the lockset that
they replaced, they must have seen it, it was right in front of their
eyes, should I be charitable and assume they can't read!
Also, the handbook says to deactivate the radio BEFORE disconnecting the
battery - well, they're only the dealership, how should they know the
security coded radio came as standard, even if they couldn't read.
It's like they didn't know Montego 2.0GTI's had central locking as
standard.
Why didn't they do that yesterday to save me the bother?
Well, after taking 45 mins along the M4 this morning, with no radio, I
got more and more anoyed about the "service" I have had from the
garage.
So I phoned up. They then tell me they need the chasis number from my
log book, and it will take 2 days to fax off for the code.
Then I lost my cool with them, and told them what I thought of their
"service", and why hadn't they told me they needed the chasis number
last night!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then it clicked - surely theu know the chasis number, they had a key
cut for the old lock after they broke into it.......so I pointed this
out.
Well, we might have it they say...........oh yes, we do.
I then persuaded them that faxes don't take two days, and they have
promised phone me with the code today.(well, they've promised to phone
me on every occaision before, maybe 12th time lucky!).
I shall NEVER get a quote from them to do so much as check my tyre
pressure in future.
I am also writing to my insurers, to inform them of this saga, and what
I think of the service.
Heather - still not holding her breath.
|
1310.19 | Assuming Rover sell Montegos !! | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Thu Dec 13 1990 13:14 | 7 |
| Question : Is the garage in question a Rover dealership ?
If so, phone up Rover customer service, and whinge unceasingly.
If not, why stop with a twelve-bore, call in Arnie Shwarzenthingy.
Colin
|
1310.20 | Double check all those little bits of paper | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | I can't trype for nits! | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:19 | 19 |
| In order to deactivate the code feature you need the code in the first
place. You tell it to deactivate, and confirm with the relevant number
(stops someone borrowing the car and deactivating it themselves). So
since they don't have the number they probably never bother, and just
assume the customer has the number to re-activate.
When my Rover was delivered the invoice from the garage had the radio
serial number typed on it with 4 extra digits on the end. These were
the code. have you got the original invoice, and does it contain a
number for the radio?.
Didn't you get an orange card from penta together with the security
stickers?. I must admit the first thing I asked when my car was
delivered was "what's the radio code number?"
Not that all the above lessens the fact that they handled you very
badly, and failed to deliver a first time fix.
Richard
|
1310.21 | Stereo security codes any use ? | CHEST::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:42 | 20 |
| One thing I have heard about 'security coded' stereos is that the
memory can be erased by placing the unit in a freezer.
Not that I am suggesting that you (or the garage) do that, but I
have wondered about the effect of a good, strong frost.
If this fact is correct, I am sure that it would be general
knowledge among the 'stereo nicking' fraternity. If so,
it does kind of reduce the effect of this feature.
I suggest you wait until after your next 'exchange' with the
dealer, when you will be feeling even more aggrieved - THEN
call the Rover Customer Service number.
I feel there is no point in being too polite following the
sort of experience you have had. It may be unfair on the
person at the 'help desk', but you are more likely to get
some response that way.
If you call and sound apologetic for the incident, then I
bet you will get very little help from this Dept...
J.R. (enjoying the 'hire car' are we ?)
|
1310.22 | add to that, the M4 traffic, and I errupted | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:52 | 45 |
|
The Montego is an ex-demo, so I didn't get the original invoice.
I didn't get a card with the number on, I did get sticky labels to
put on the windscreens, boldly announcing said security feature.
(no I didn't check, which is most unlike me........never again)
It's 3 steps to deactivate the code, and 9 to enter it, the
handbook recommends deactivating, you then have 1 step to re-activate.
If they gave me a call for the code, and I did have it, they could have
de-activated it as specified in the book, and saved me any problem.
If they gave me a call for the code, and I didn't have it, they could
have faxed off for the number yesterday, re-activated it, and saved any
problem.
They didn't mention they had to disconect the battery, they didn't
mention I would need the code to reset the radio, I found out just
before I drove off, when I turned the radio on.
I had one story last night, and a different story today.
I didn't go through the whole story here, because the initial intention
was to just sort out the insurance, however:
The keys were stolen Sunday evening.
When I called at 4.30 on Wednesday, saying I was coming over to pick up
the car, they told me of the stolen keys, and that they had to break
into my car to move it, they then cut a spare key for it.
Now, all this time, they never called, and never said the car would
not be ready in time because of this delay, I eventually picked up the
car on the Friday.
They broke into my car and broke the central locking in the first place,
they could have called me in work, and I could have given them another
key. They could have called me and told me the car wouldn't be ready
by Wednesday..........I have since realised that they NEVER call me.
In all this time, it is me doing the calling.
Although the radio was probably the smallest problem I've had with
them, it just happened to be "the straw that broke the camels back".
Heather.................STILL waiting for a return call.
|
1310.23 | | SPAWN::BRIGHT | Care for a liquorice allsort? | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:04 | 7 |
| .21 >> One thing I have heard about 'security coded' stereos is that the
.21 >> memory can be erased by placing the unit in a freezer.
Note 163.11 in UK_AUDIO conference (node MALLET:: for interested parties)
unfortunately dispels this rumour.
Steve.
|
1310.24 | finito, she said, not holding her breath | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:15 | 23 |
|
>.21 >> One thing I have heard about 'security coded' stereos is that the
>.21 >> memory can be erased by placing the unit in a freezer.
Thanks, that gave me a giggle, do you think the people in the Rover
Dealership could fit into the said freezer????? or is this wishful
thinking!
I phoned up customer services, they will not be able to give me the
code number until after their "overnight computer run".
I tried selling them consultancy to write an on-line update/enquiry
but they didn't understand, they thought 24-hour turnaround was
marvellous. I reminded them that they were customer service, and as a
customer, I didn't find it marvellous.
If I put my full complaint in writing they will take it up with the
garage.
So, that's it. I hope to get the number tomorrow, which I will
then set myself (and record in my booklet).
Heather
|
1310.25 | | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | I can't trype for nits! | Thu Dec 13 1990 16:00 | 15 |
| I too had problems with a Phillips radio in my Rover, it died 3 weeks
from new!. So being nearest to Ruskins (who DIN"T supply it) I called
in there, they confirmed it was dead (What a surprise) and offered to
send it away for repair, no they didn't have a replacement to put in.
I'd have been weeks without it!.
So I stropped and moaned, refused a repair, complained about waiting,
and in the end they gave me the 'top-of-the-range' radio "just for a
few day's till your's get's back". Me:"I want a new one, I'm not
accepting a repair", them:"Oh I mean when the replacement comes in..."
This was 12/10, I think they've forgotten (I hope they've forgotten!)
P.S. the code has not been activated :-}
Richard
|
1310.26 | cowboys of the western world unite - join the motor trade | CHEFS::ARNOLD | | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:41 | 3 |
| Looks like another garage/repairer for my infamous "blacklist"
D
|
1310.27 | And there's more..... | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:51 | 15 |
|
Well, Ruskins faxed off for my number yesterday.
Today they say they have not had a reply.
I phoned up Rover, and they faxed the number back yesterday afternoon.
So I have given the name and number of the lady who faxed the reply, to
Ruskins, who say they will follow this up!
Heather
PS, they also faxed back a number for a Rover 200, that could be yours!!
Going blue in the face holding her breath for so long.
|
1310.28 | | BAHTAT::FORCE4::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Fri Dec 14 1990 17:01 | 10 |
| Heather,
Can't Rover fax you...
or mail you with X.400
;^))
Greg
|
1310.29 | Not yet | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Dec 17 1990 08:36 | 5 |
| >Can't Rover fax you...
>
>or mail you with X.400
Rover are currently considering the purchase of an X.400 facility.
|
1310.30 | at last...... | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Dec 17 1990 11:07 | 8 |
|
I received the number on Friday evening, and programmed the car radio
accordingly.
All systems go - and it's only taken a month!
Heather
|
1310.31 | And I had the nerve to think things were fixed | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:19 | 21 |
|
Okay Simon, I need that shotgun, and I need it NOW!!!!!!!!!
My insurance brokers have phoned up, Royal Insurance have contacted them
saying a claim has been put through for a new lock set, and as only the
bumper and indicator were damaged, they have to process this as a
different claim from ME.
Now, I never got anything in writing from Ruskins to say that the
Insurers had agreed to this "deal", mind you, I never signed anything
with regard to the new lock-set.
I have explained the whole story to my broker, he says he will sort
it out for me.
That'll teach me to think that everything was fine!!!!!!
Heather
|
1310.32 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:48 | 11 |
| I suggest, since you have the lockset fitted and the car back (at last)
in satisfactory nick, that you ring the insurance company and your
broker, confirming in writing, that you are emphatically not making any
claim, that the lockset damage is the responsibility and liability of
the garage, and they should discuss it with them and not trouble you
again.
You certainly do not want another claim on your record, for damage done
unnecessarily by a known third party.
Steve
|
1310.33 | | RDGE21::ARNOLD | | Thu Jan 24 1991 10:58 | 6 |
| I'm still weatching this one, but the results service has been a little
lacking recently. Are you going to update us Heather, or keep us in
"suspendies" until the final outcome or solution, where's that shotgun
??
D
|
1310.34 | on, and on, and on, and......snap..ping! | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jan 24 1991 12:34 | 8 |
|
I am waiting for the brokers to get back to me...........
they say it will be this afternoon............
Heather
|
1310.35 | Finis | THEALE::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jan 28 1991 11:12 | 18 |
|
The brokers have got back to me this morning..........
They say Royal Insurance have agreed to put the key-claim on the
previous claim as I requested.
ME ?????????? I ??????????????
grerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
However, this is the end of it. (famous last words)
Heather
|
1310.36 | A good story for a 10-year soap opera? | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu May 09 1991 18:20 | 25 |
|
> However, this is the end of it. (famous last words)
You will not be unduly surprised that Ruskins called me this afternoon,
They tell me I had two lots of my work done, one which was covered
on the insurance, and the other, which I have not yet paid for.
You're darn right I haven't paid for it. My insurance brokers are
Swinton Insurance of Mutley Plain Plymouth, as Mr. Ruskin is only
to well aware. My insurance company is Royal Insurance, as is your
insurance company.
If Mr. Ruskin would like to call me back, and arrange a meeting with
me at my connvienience, and on nutral territory, I will oblige. I
will have my solicitor with me. Goodday.
Well, Mr. Ruskin hasn't called me back.............yet?
And I thought Penta were bad!
Heather
|
1310.37 | and on, and on, and on, and on...... | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:17 | 16 |
|
Well folkes, continuing this story which started a year ago.....
I have had a cliam form in the post today.............to claim for the
keys that were stolen, and the replacement of the locks.
I thought it had been quiet for too long!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is there a scream topic in here anywhere??????????????
Heather
|