T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1228.1 | Equal rights for giants NOW! | YUPPY::FOX | Two houses for sale, any offers? | Wed Sep 19 1990 10:38 | 21 |
| As a result of an ongoing discussion in 1188 relating to Toyota MR2s, I
thought I'd share with you the reactions I've received from a number of
vehicle franchises (not an exhaustive list) relating to whether they
can modify the driver's seat position to accommodate my legroom
requirements (I'm 6' 7"):-
Rover Group "No, there is no demand for this"
Volvo "No problem! How far back do you want it?"
Vauxhall "Dunno sir"
BMW "Not possible" [not necessary either]
Mercedes "Not possible in a 190, try a 200 instead"
Renault "What a strange question"
Fiat/Lancia "I'm sure we could work something out, but
it might invalidate the warranty"
VW/Audi "No"
Citroen "Citroen offer a seat extension kit, would
you like me to get a costing for you?"
Subaru "No"
Toyota "Sorry, not at present"
Mazda "Gosh, how tall are you?" [aaaaargh]
|
1228.2 | Cars for tall people. | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Wed Sep 19 1990 10:39 | 21 |
|
Oh well,
Being neither overtall or overwide I don't have problems with many cars
(although my head brushed the roof of a Pug 205 I rode in once), but
both my cars suit tall people very well.
The Renault 5 is a tall car and has plenty of headroom, a number of
tall people have commented on how comfortable they find the car as both
passengers and drivers.
The Marcos is a car specifically designed for tall people. At 5' 10" I
have to have the pedals fully BACK to drive the car and anyone shorter
would need a cushion behind them to reach the pedals (a specially
designed squab and back cushion known as a tadpole is available), so
if you want an unusual, fast and comfortable (well in terms of
legroom anyway!) car then the Marcos is probably worth a look. Getting
into a coupe (rather than a convertible Spyder) might prove difficult
for someone over 6' 2" though!
Mark
|
1228.3 | | ULYSSE::COLLINS | Russ, 828-5371, Valbonne | Wed Sep 19 1990 11:27 | 6 |
| Alfas have been great for me (6'4"), and I like to drive
"arms-extended". One of the early ones (the 1300 Gullietta Veloce
Sypder, I think) I had to clip of the stops on the seat rail so it
would slid all the way back.
russ
|
1228.4 | Giants - A freak of nature ? | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | CSC, Basingstoke | Wed Sep 19 1990 11:35 | 15 |
| I've got the the same problem. I'm 6'5" and my problem isn't so
much legroom but HEADROOM.
This is many caused by nearly all manufacturers fitting sunroofs
as standard on their cars. Consequently reducing significantly the
headroom. The worst are electric sunroosfs, because not only is
the headroom reduced to accommadate the sunroof when it slides _under_
the roof but also for electric motor. A classic example of this
is the GSi cavalier which despite having a seat height adjuster,
I'm still bent double. (I find seat height adjustment a waste of
time because they only seem to raise the seat and not lower it.
Has anyone else got problems like these ?
Roy
|
1228.5 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I've got a special purpose | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:14 | 4 |
| Take the front seats out of a mini and cut the roof off!
Ian
|
1228.6 | | BIGHUN::THOMAS | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:42 | 56 |
|
Well, compared to you lot, I'm a little short-a*s, however, I have great
problems finding cars with enough leg-room.
I am 5'8".
I have 36" inside leg, and often wear 1.5" heels (thats if I can find
them that low!)
I don't like driving with my legs apart to fit around the steering
wheel, as that causes my dress/skirt to end up around my waist, and
has a detrimental effect on the driving capabilities of lorry drivers.
If you're tall, then people tend to understand requests for seats to
be put back.
I tend to get the comment - but you're not that tall - along with a
look which says women should never have been allowed to take the
driving test!
The car salesmen then have the intellectual capabilities of a spotty
teanager when I have a test-drive.
The other thing is, if I do eventually get the leg-room, I can't
reach the steering wheel!
The NG is absolutely ace for leg-room, and steering wheel position.
Getting in/out with the soft-top on and a tight skirt is another story!
I had a Peugot 1.3, the steering wheel was high enough to allow my
legs to get under it, and with the seat right back, really driveable.
I couldn't get anywhere near the Rover 216/8xx - knees under my chin!
My dad's Seirra is another impossibility - but at 6'4" and 15 stone
he has no problem.
(then he's only got a 33" inside leg)
Most of the adjustable steering wheels allow for the "new lower racing
position" - I need them higher, not lower.
The landrover is fine, I would prefer to be a little further back
- nothing to do with legroom tho'.
I have a Montego - this is just OK with the seat full back - however
Dave and I between us are forever changing the mirrors/seat position.
He can't reach the pedals to drive it with the seat back, although
he's 2.5" taller than me.
Cest la vie...................................
Heather
PS I had a mini cooperess that had the seat welded further back, that
was really ace around the Devon/Cornwall country roads.
|
1228.7 | RIP 'landy - engine et mort ! | MCGRUE::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:47 | 4 |
| Have you found out about the delights of bump steer then Hevs?
Simon
|
1228.8 | | BIGHUN::THOMAS | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:55 | 6 |
|
I don't want to talk about bumps thanks - still not sure whether we
will be able to go around Castle Coombe on Saturday.
'%$#"\@ male drivers
|
1228.10 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Wed Sep 19 1990 14:58 | 18 |
| The first Astra I had (old, square style) could easily have the seat
re-positioned. Take out 4 bolts, and then re-bolt it into another
hole... there were (if I remember) 2 rows of 3 holes on the plate, with
about an inch lower and 1.5 back or forwards from the standard
position.
This allowed a comfortable position.
Since then it's Vauxhalls all the way, with a seat height adjuster that
seemed to lower the seat, rather than just raise it, and a tilting
upwards wheel, so that I can get my knees under it.
I also tried the latest Escort / Orion. That has a wheel that can be
adjusted for reach - so that I can have the seat right back, but still
reach the wheel. If only the seat height adjuster lowered the seat,
rather than being another tilting device...
Cheers, Chris
|
1228.11 | Play for today | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Wed Sep 19 1990 15:03 | 43 |
| Me: This car is a little short of headroom.
Salesman: Well, sir, this model is fitted with adjustable seat height.
All you have to do is to move this little lever, one way makes it go
up, and the other way makes it go down. If you make the seat go down,
this gives you the most headroom..."
Me: Strange as it may seem, I am not actually a half-wit. I had spotted
the lever, and lowered the seat as far as it would go. The car is still
short of headroom.
Salesman: Well, sir, you are probable unusually tall, most people find
it OK.
Me: Most people aren't going to drive it, I am.
Salesman: Yes, sir. Its the sunroof, sir, it takes out an inch and a
half of the headroom, you see.
Me: Fine, show me one without a sunroof then.
Salesman: Oh, they don't make this model without a sunroof, theres no
demand, you see.
Me: So the guff about the sunroof taking out headroom is BS, because
the standard car has it fitted.
Salesman: Well, you could try it with the seat back reclined. That
would allow your head to clear the roof.
Me: Yes, but then I cannot reach the steering wheel.
Salesman: Well, sir, on this model the wheel adjusts for height and
rake, so everybody can find a comfortable position.
Me: But how does that let me reach the wheel?
Salesman: Well just move the back rest up a bit...
Me: BUT I'VE GOT NO HEADROOM....
Steve
|
1228.12 | Sunroofs again | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | CSC, Basingstoke | Wed Sep 19 1990 15:14 | 13 |
| It surprises me that so many people have mentioned the problem of
sunroofs taking away headroom. I thought i was the only one.
If only manufacturers would offer an alternative of no sunroof
i'd go for that every time. I guess its more cost effective just
to mass produce all cars with sunroofs rather than offering them
as a no cost option.
When considering a car, the first i check is if it has a sunroof.
Sometimes i'm all set to order car only to find out that the car
now comes with a "sunroof as standard"
-Roy
|
1228.13 | | YUPPY::FOX | Two houses for sale, any offers? | Wed Sep 19 1990 15:38 | 4 |
| Re .12
You're not alone on that one Roy .....
|
1228.14 | Try the Calibra | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | CSC, Basingstoke | Wed Sep 19 1990 16:03 | 9 |
| Hey John,
Even though the Calibra has a sunroof, I found it very roomy.
I understand that you're looking for a new car, have you considered
it ?
The sunroof slides over the roof and presents no probs.
- Roy
|
1228.15 | | YUPPY::FOX | Two houses for sale, any offers? | Wed Sep 19 1990 16:50 | 1 |
| I'll pop into Davys tonight and have a shuftie....
|
1228.16 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:03 | 5 |
| The obvious solution is for manufacturers to change the position of
the sunroof slightly, or make it larger, so your head pokes out through
it. Something like a Challenger tank.
Jeff :-)
|
1228.17 | boingggggg | BIGHUN::THOMAS | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:35 | 10 |
|
Well, I have absolutely no problems with headroom.
should I cut 5" off my legs, and use that to increase the length
of my arms and neck?
Heather
|
1228.18 | Lengthen the arms and take the legs up a bit! | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:43 | 5 |
| Re .17
Sounds like the only option.
Mark
|
1228.19 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Wed Sep 19 1990 18:29 | 3 |
| Maybe for those with headroom / sunroof problems a list of cars that
do NOT have sun-roofs would be useful.... I haven't found any yet in my
price bracket...
|
1228.20 | | GVA01::STIFF | Paul Stiff, EHQIM-OIS DTN:821 4167 | Wed Sep 19 1990 18:31 | 7 |
| Heather,
Try a Volvo 1800 S - they are designed for Swedes - no legroom or
headroom problem - and ideal is long legs and short arms, then you're
really comfortable.
Paul
|
1228.21 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Wed Sep 19 1990 18:34 | 21 |
| Cars where I have not had problems are:
Ford Granada Ghia - has a real height adjuster and wheel adjustable for
rake and reach
Toyota Camry - seems right anyway
Vauxhall Carlton - headroom OK, but if the seat is far enough back for
my legs, I can't reach the wheel
Ford Sierra - marginal
Vauxhall Cavalier - again marginal.
Seems to me if you spend "Executive" car money, you are OK. If you want
something smaller, be prepared to spend your motoring life in a kind of
foetal crouch.
BTW the Peugeot 605 appears marginal, but I have only sat in it.
Steve
|
1228.22 | BX estate | DOOZER::PENNEY | | Wed Sep 19 1990 19:07 | 11 |
| Car with no sunroof: Citroen BX Estate (not hatchback). Sunroof not
available even as an option, plus headroom miles better than hatchback to
start with due to higher roof line.
Would guess ok for giants, but maybe only duck-like ones since I reckon the
steering column housing's a bit low. Saying this 'cos even my knee
(approx. 1/2 way down 30" inside leg) bumps it when I try to heel & toe.
Steering rake/height/reach not adjustable on any BXs.
Richard
|
1228.23 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:19 | 16 |
| Re .22
Yes, but Citoren fit that wierd single wiper, and if you are tall
enough to need the headroom, you are looking through the top third of
the screen. This part of the screen is only half swept, so whilst you
will have a fair view of the pavement in the wet, you will just have to
guess at the oncoming traffic. Makes driving exciting.
You also will be unable to reach the radio, heater controls, and quite
possibly the steering wheel.
Other than that, it is terriffic. (Not sarcy - my short-lived BX GTi
had the most wonderful chassis and driveline; I would have it still if
I could have got in it.)
Steve
|
1228.24 | Could be a Calibra next time .... | YUPPY::FOX | Two houses for sale, any offers? | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:22 | 5 |
| Well I tried a Calibra last night at Davy's in Basingstoke, and was
amazed to find that both legroom and headroom were fine - and that was
in a car with a sunroof!
|
1228.25 | More small cars for giants | COMICS::SHELLEYR | Can hearses under-take ? | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:32 | 12 |
| John,
That should be one for Vauxhalls books, that a Calibra can comfortably
fit someone thats 6' 7 ! which one would interest you ? the 8v or 16v
or even the new 4x4. Will you need to get an auto or was the 5 speed OK
?
I'm 6' 5 and prefer small cars. Two hatchbacks that I've found
surprising good for headroom (my main problem) is the R 5 GT turbo
(when it comes standard it has no sunroof) and the Fiesta RS turbo/XR2i
although that has a sunroof it only tilts, it doesn't slide back so it
doesn'r rob you of those precious inches.
|
1228.27 | | YUPPY::FOX | Two houses for sale, any offers? | Thu Sep 20 1990 12:41 | 17 |
| Funny you should say that - I'm thinking of an Escort Cabriolet ... but
after owning one XR2 and leasing a second, I'm extremely suspicious of
Ford in general - they sometimes forget that customers pay their
salaries ..... BMW doesn't (forget).
On the subject of the Calibra, I'd definitely go for an 8v, but only
because of the lease price of the vehicle.
I've just been speaking to Clover Leaf in Basingstoke about the '91
spec for Volvo 440s. In their infinite wisdom, Volvo have decided to
fit as standard sunroofs to all 440s with the exception of the base
model. This is a pain, because otherwise the Volvo would have been
an ideal contender.
Mr Volvo at Clover Leaf was disappointed when I told him I wouldn't be
selecting a 440 after all.
|
1228.28 | Calibras again | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | CSC, Basingstoke | Thu Sep 20 1990 13:51 | 15 |
| Interesting that you would go for an 8v, I would myself for the
same reasons as you (price). The factis i read that vauxhall were
reckoning to sell far more 16v models than 8v, about two thirds
if i remember correctly. I don't about you, although i haven't seen
that many calibras on the road the majority have been 8v (you can
tell easily because the 8v has the same tacky wheel trims as the
SRi, whereas thee 16v has GSi alloy wheels). On Howard's Way on
Sunday (Ah hem, just happened to watch it)some guy drove up in a
calibra which judging by the wheel trims was an 8v.
Seems to me that vauxhall may ahve got their sums wrong.
Any body agree/disagree ?
- Roy
|
1228.29 | Don't think I've seen an 8 valve. | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Thu Sep 20 1990 14:13 | 10 |
|
I've not seen an 8 valve yet (all the demonstrators or cars on the
road I've seen have been 16 valves). Are you sure about the wheels?
I didn't think that 16 valve wheels were the same as the the GSi, but
I don't KNOW there not.
Mark
PS I'm more interested in the 16 valve, but the 8 valve got a better
review than the 16 valve in last week's A&M.
|
1228.30 | No roof is still no go!! | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Thu Sep 20 1990 17:25 | 8 |
| .26�Have a car without a roof!
I tried that - it didn't work!!
I tried an XR3i cabriolet, and it had this nice safe anti-roll bar -
i.e. a bit of metal about 3 inches thick below the roof line, just
where my head wanted to be!! Even with the roof down, the roll bar was
still there in the way.
|
1228.31 | Sometimes the cheaper car really is better | JANUS::BARKER | Jeremy Barker - T&N/CBN Diag. Eng. - Reading, UK | Tue Sep 25 1990 19:59 | 7 |
| Re: .28
I read somewhere that the 8v Calibra is much smoother and quieter than the 16v.
Not that I would be interested in either.
jb
|
1228.32 | | CHEST::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Wed Sep 26 1990 10:00 | 14 |
|
Re .31
It isn't unusual for a lower powered version of a car to be smoother
and quieter than the high(er) performance versions.
Try driving a 1.3 Escort and then an RS Turbo, or a GTX Renault 5 and
then a 5 GT Turbo.
If you don't want any power from your Calibra then the 8 valve is
probably a good choice (also good on motorways I'd guess), but that
115 bhp engine is a really gutless engine.
Mark
|
1228.33 | | VOGON::BALL | Have you got a licence for that pun? | Wed Sep 26 1990 20:17 | 12 |
| I'm 1.97m tall (work it out!) and drive a BX. I got one without a sunroof which
means that headroom is not a problem. Legroom is a bit cramped but OK. As
Steve said, the radio is awkward to reach but that's mainly because it's in such
a dumb position behind the gearstick anyway. My main complaint is that the rear
view mirror is mounted low down the windscreen so it obscures part of my field
of view.
I found that you have to try legroom for yourself - for instance, the Volvo 340
has a couple of inches extra quoted legroom than the BX but felt more cramped.
All sorts of factors come into play like the size of the steering wheel.
Jon
|
1228.34 | Not a lot of people know that! :-) | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | Live long and prosper | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:19 | 10 |
| >> <<< Note 1228.33 by VOGON::BALL "Have you got a licence for that pun?" >>>
>>view mirror is mounted low down the windscreen so it obscures part of my field
>>of view.
On the original BX they were a lot higher. But, due to the low rear
roof line it limited the view of the road behind in the distance. Thus
the mirror was mounted further down from about 1986 onwards.
Richard
|
1228.35 | Twist the mirror 'round. | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:26 | 10 |
| I find the rear view mirror too low on astras and cavaliers.
If you twist the mirror upsidedown, it raises the hight and gives
just as good visability out the back and improves forward vision.
I don't know if you can do this on the BX. Can you still get BX
hatchbacks without a sunroof, I thought they were standard on all
models now except the estate ?
- Roy
|
1228.36 | | VOGON::BALL | Have you got a licence for that pun? | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:42 | 6 |
| >Can you still get BX hatchbacks without a sunroof,
Mine's a BX14 TGE on which the sunroof was an option when I got it in May.
The models may have changed since then or it may be standard on 16's and 19's.
Jon
|
1228.37 | | JUNO::WOOD | Scalpel, scissors, replace head ....... | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:26 | 8 |
|
I find the same problem with rear view mirror on the carlton, and I am only
5'6".!!!!!!!
Alan
~~~~~~
|
1228.38 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:36 | 15 |
| My carlton's mirror is on a little stalk jointed at both ends, so I can
move the mirror bodily up til it touches the roof, where it normally
sits. I can thus see out unobstructed.
However, the steering wheel adjusts up and down, but not in and out, so
with the seat far enough back to deal with the pedals properly, and the
seat set as low as possible so I don't hit the roof, I am forced both
to have the seat backrest bolt upright and arms straight out to the
wheel.
I'd go back to a Grandad, if they only fitted them with engines that
revved to 4000+ without sounding like its about to come through the
bonnet in bits.
Steve
|
1228.39 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Thu Sep 27 1990 17:43 | 9 |
| I also position my Carlton just like you... (mirror, seats etc). Just
for a change I sometimes also position it:
Seat 1 or 2 notches forward.
Wheel up 1 or 2 notches (to get the knees under it)
Seat back tilted backwards a little, and also raised up by 3/4".
This gives a totally different driving position - I don't think that it
is as comfortable - but it is different!
|
1228.40 | Max headroom... | SIEVAX::LAW | Mathew Law, SIE | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:45 | 8 |
|
I hired a brand new Sierra 1.8LX with sunroof at the weekend. I'm not *that*
tall, at a fraction over 6 foot, but it took a lot of adjusting to stop my
head pressing against the ceiling. I think I'll stick to my VW Beetle, which
has about 6 inches of head room!
Mat.
*:o)
|
1228.41 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Tue Oct 02 1990 18:26 | 7 |
| I think sierras are fitted with a seat height adjuster did you try
that ?
I've found sierra very good for headroom, I just _hate_ the shape.
- Roy (6'5")
|
1228.42 | Sierras | SIEVAX::LAW | Mathew Law, SIE | Wed Oct 03 1990 10:48 | 10 |
|
Yup. I turned the height adjuster all the way down, messed about with the
backward/forward adjustment, seat back angle, and lumbar support, but with
no improvement. I think its because I have a long body and short legs
(relatively speaking!). Removal of the sun roof would have given me
all the room I needed. Why don't they build cars higher if the default is
to fit a sun roof?
Mat.
*:o)
|
1228.43 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Wed Oct 03 1990 16:02 | 5 |
| >> Why don't they build cars higher if the default is to fit a sun
roof?
Easy ! If they built them higher it would reduce the areodynamics
(sp?)
|
1228.44 | New Escort/Orion | COMICS::SHELLEYR | Can hearses under-take ? | Thu Oct 04 1990 17:16 | 10 |
| Have any of you "tall guys" sat in the new escort/orion ?
I had a look at the orion LX at Jackson's at lunchtime and was horrified by the
lack of space. Again this was caused by a sunroof. There is definately less room
than the old style.
Has anyone else found this ? and do you know if the top of the range models
(ie ghia) have a seat height adjuster ?
- Roy
|
1228.45 | Orion - no go | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:26 | 12 |
| see .10
The Orion did have a seat tilt-adjuster that claimed to be a height
adjuster.
The steering wheel moved in and out - so that by pulling it out as
far as possible, I could tip the seat back and lie down in the car, so
that I didn't hit the roof; and because of the movaable wheel I could
still steer.
I couldn't see what to steer round, though, becuase I was lying
down!
|
1228.46 | Maestro ? | SYSTEM::BOOTHE | Karen Boothe | Mon Oct 08 1990 11:56 | 9 |
|
What about an MG Maestro EFI ?. Loads of legroom and plenty of
headroom.
My boyfriend has no problems (6'5" with 35" inside leg). He also fits
in a Pug 205 with no problems (without a sunroof though - if it has a
sunroof his hair gets trapped !).
Karen
|
1228.47 | | BIGHUN::THOMAS | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Oct 08 1990 14:11 | 24 |
| Hi Karen, I thought I'd mentioned these two:
> What about an MG Maestro EFI ?. Loads of legroom and plenty of
> headroom.
My last car was an MG Maestro EFI - I had no problems either.
> My boyfriend has no problems (6'5" with 35" inside leg). He also fits
> in a Pug 205 with no problems (without a sunroof though - if it has a
> sunroof his hair gets trapped !).
My previuos car to the Maestro was a Pug 205, and I had no problems
with that.
My current car is a Montego 2.0 GTI, with no problems.
HOWEVER, it took me ages to find these cars, after numerous test-driving
and dissapointments.
Heather
- my hair gets trapped when I close the window too quickly!!!!!!!
|
1228.48 | | OVAL::ALFORDJ | Ice a speciality | Mon Oct 08 1990 15:13 | 4 |
|
> - my hair gets trapped when I close the window too quickly!!!!!!!
Maybe you should wear your flying helmet in that car as well :-)
|
1228.49 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Wed Oct 10 1990 14:47 | 6 |
| Interesting you can fit the Montego GTI...
I had a standard Montego as a hire car when my car was in for a
service - and I had to take it back before driving any further than
the 10 miles to work and back - it wasn't safe to drive anyfirther with
my head on one side.
|
1228.50 | second thoughts | BIGHUN::THOMAS | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Oct 12 1990 14:46 | 8 |
|
I don't have headroom problems, just legroom...........
Maybe I could swith my legs for yours, and I'd have no problems?
Heather :-)
|
1228.51 | | YUPPY::FOX | A Friend of the Earl of Carnaervon | Mon Oct 29 1990 09:07 | 20 |
| Well, I've finally decided what my new lease-mobile is going to be -
well, when I say I've decided, perhaps "think I've decided" would be
more accurate.
On my shortlist were:
Land Rover Discovery TDi (too expensive by far)
Vauxhall Calibra 8V (a bit more than I want to pay)
Ford Escort Cabriolet EFi (the right price, but not really big enough)
BMW 316iA [same as current] (more expensive than willing to pay)
Volvo 480ES (a bit more than I want to pay, but not as much as the
Calibra!)
My choice:
The Volvo - plenty of legroom, very comfortable, headroom OK,
different, chic.
Voila!
|
1228.52 | 480ES vs 8v Calibra = similar cost | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Tue Oct 30 1990 20:45 | 10 |
| I've checked out the 480ES and thought it a good car. No probs
with headroom as the one I tryed didn't have a sun roof. The
performance was not at all stunning though, if you're after a quick
car there are plenty that can out perform it for the price.
I can't see how you can say its "not as expensive as the calibra"
because on the lease scheme the 8v calibra you mentioned costs about
�1395/yr (supplement holder) and the volvo 480ES about �1380/yr.
Not a lot of difference there!
|
1228.53 | One must keep up appearances after all! | YUPPY::FOX | WordPerfect Expert | Wed Oct 31 1990 09:09 | 4 |
| Mmmmmm, perhaps I meant the Volvo is not as expensive in "It's only a
Vauxhall" terms? :-)
|
1228.54 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Wed Oct 31 1990 09:19 | 6 |
| .53� Mmmmmm, perhaps I meant the Volvo is not as expensive in "It's only a
.53� Vauxhall" terms? :-)
But a 480!??! - surely that is even worse in "It's only a Volvo" terms!
:-)
|
1228.56 | More on sunroofs | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Help ! I've got Iraqnophobia | Tue Jan 29 1991 12:04 | 15 |
| I'm sure I'm not the only 6ft+ guy who is upset at manufacturers
insisting in putting in sunroof's that rob valueable headroom.
Well, you maybe interested that when discussing this problem with
a salesman when looking at the Rover 200 range, he informed me that
you can order a Rover with a "delete" option.
So you could have a car with a sunroof thats standard without the
sunroof !
I don't know if any other companies can offer this, but I have been
put off cars in the past through lack of headroom, just because
it has a sunroof.
- Roy
|
1228.57 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GOTTAJOB - regrettably outside DEC | Tue Jan 29 1991 12:59 | 9 |
| .56 is seriously INTERESTING. It raises the possibility of, say,
deleting the sunroof and lecky windows, and ordering air conditioning
in its place.
The question is, how much do they knock off for deleting the sunroof?
Pound to a bowl of used prunes they charge extra!
Steve
|
1228.58 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Help ! I've got Iraqnophobia | Tue Jan 29 1991 13:02 | 7 |
| Steve, I got the impression that they would'nt knock off any money,
but they wouldnt charge extra.
Check it out, I didn't pursue it but thought it was worth a mention
here.
- Roy
|
1228.59 | Oh Yes I had the steel roof fitted as a option :- | NEWOA::BARRON | Snoopy Vs Red_Barron | Tue Jan 29 1991 13:24 | 10 |
| Re:
> Well, you maybe interested that when discussing this problem with
> a salesman when looking at the Rover 200 range, he informed me that
> you can order a Rover with a "delete" option.
>
Roy
Did you find out how much this option costs?
Dave (whos wonderin how much it'll cost to wield the roof back in :-) :-) )
|
1228.60 | MAX HEADROOM not enough! | COMICS::SCOBLE | Cantankerous. Me! | Wed Mar 20 1991 14:41 | 24 |
|
I entered into correspondence with Rover on this point, as I
had to have the seat back uncomfortably far back to sit upright!
At the time, an electric sunroof was listed as a delete option
in the Rover price list, although the local dealer didn't seem to
think it was possible to arrange this. The outcome was Rover saying
that the electric sunroof had to be supplied with the Gsi variant,
and they lost a sale. It was very annoying at the time, because I
really liked everything else about the car. They've probably
lost 1000's of sales because of this drawback/feature.
Lack of headroom was apparantly the most common comment people came
up with when sitting in the car for the first time at the Earls
Court last year, so the sales people told me.
I've since noticed in later blurb that there is no mention of delete
options. Maybe their waiting list is so great just now they can
afford not to worry about costly individual specifications that
might interrupt the production process for this model, but for how
long!
Gordon
|
1228.61 | The 214 Si _doesn't_ have a sunroof | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Mar 20 1991 15:09 | 8 |
| Thanks Gordon for clarifying this.
I thought about this a while back when deciding on a car. I thought that
as the "Si" doesn't come with a sunroof (or much else) and was cheap on
the lease scheme (not to mention <1400cc tax bracket) it might be worth
putting in a quote with desired options (ie. electric windows etc.)
- Roy
|
1228.62 | Need more room | CHEFS::WATRETA | demon in DM's | Wed Jun 30 1993 11:52 | 6 |
|
I currently drive a 205 XLD but due to lack of leg room it causes my bad back.
Can anyone please suggest what I could test drive which would give me oodles of
legroom without being a completely boring family type car.
Anne
|
1228.63 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Wed Jun 30 1993 13:37 | 2 |
|
A Golf ?
|
1228.64 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Imagine: It's your business, your money... | Wed Jun 30 1993 16:18 | 5 |
| We're all different shapes, so try a number of cars, especially those with seat
height and lumbar adjustments (as opposed to just legroom and rake).
Dave.
P.S. I get back ache in a Golf!
|
1228.65 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Jun 30 1993 16:26 | 10 |
| Anne, how tall are you ? I'm 6'5" but find I can fit in
most cars. I have always found the most comfortable journeys are in
cars with sports type seats. I currently drive a Fiesta RS Turbo which
has Recaro's which are excellent. Legroom isn't good but has never
caused me a problem. If you are very tall you have to face facts that
cars will never be made to fit you properly.
Like Dave says, check out some cars that you like the look of.
Royston
|
1228.66 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:48 | 24 |
|
Anne, I am 5'9" but have 36"inside leg.........I have lots of
problems getting cars with enough leg room....especially if I wear
any shoes except flats. I don't like having to drive with my legs
apart to get the steering wheel between them.
I currently drive a Montego, with the seat right back.
Avoid any car with a steering wheel adjuster, they tend to have low
steering wheels, which can only be adjusted lower, for a more "sporty"
feel.....OK for those people who wear trousers all the time, and
don't mid a leg either side of the wheel.
My husbands rover 826 is fine, his previuos car, a senator, was
terrible.
I sometimes find with Fords, that the clutch seems a long way away,
and need the seat closer to be able to depress it, the accellerator
and break are then too close, and I bash my knee on the wheel, or
get my foot caught under the pedals.
Sorry the car doesn't sound exciting, but its got loads of legroom.
Heather
|
1228.67 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Jun 30 1993 17:55 | 9 |
| I don't think height is the main issue here. It's how
you sit to feel comfortable when driving. Many people
my size push my seat right back when driving.
Like a previous note said, try a few out. It really is
the only way.
Ian
|
1228.68 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | Off-duty Rab C Nesbit stunt double | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:04 | 7 |
| This may be no help at all, but there seems to be bags of room in a
Renault 18. You can sit in my old heap (my old Renault 18, shut up you
lot) for a try-out if you want - it's usually round the back of
Deathpark.
Richard
|
1228.69 | | RDGENG::RUSLING | Dave Rusling REO2 G/E9 830-4380 | Wed Jun 30 1993 18:18 | 7 |
|
I think that comfort is only part of it. You have to be able to operate the
controls too (and in a timely fashion). My wife has to have the seat in her
Cavalier a little too close so she can depress the clutch. I too have a 36"
inside leg but the Cavalier fits well as does an MX-5...
Dave
|
1228.70 | | CHEFS::WATRETA | demon in DM's | Thu Jul 01 1993 09:50 | 20 |
|
Heather like you I have a 36" inside leg but I'm 6'. My main problem is that My
legs are longer between the knee and ankle, so I'm usually ok with the clutch
but my right knee touches the steering wheel. Sitting in this position for a
couple of hours is not pleasant.
I test drove a 440 Volvo last night (Yuck a volvo) It was fine for leg room but
there was no space beside the clutch to rest your foot, so when I was moving my
foot to the floor, I kept bashing my knee on the steering wheel.
I'm off to test drive a golf at lunchtime, so I've worn my shoes with heels
(like I really need heels being 6' already !!) Anyone know where the VW garage
is in Reading????
Cheers
Anne
P.S. thanks for all the suggestions not sure about the renault 18 though ;-)
|
1228.71 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Thu Jul 01 1993 16:53 | 14 |
| I have the same problem... I test drove a lot of cars earlier this
year... my main criteria is legroom.... the ones I found ok were:
Astra
Cavalier
Nissan 100nx
Colt
The old Astra shape was by far the best. A Cavalier with tiltable
steering column is better than one without, as you can lift the wheel
away from your knees...
Xtine
|
1228.72 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | Off-duty Rab C Nesbit stunt double | Thu Jul 01 1993 18:17 | 6 |
| A critical look at the Renault shows that its probably no good for
people with high knees, but should be brilliant if you've got
enormously fat ankles....8*)
Richard
|
1228.73 | Still no demand for it....? | LARVAE::TREVENNOR_A | A child of init | Mon May 15 1995 10:15 | 8 |
|
Has this situation moved on at all? I am 6' 5" and my cavalier is up
for renewal soonish. Cavalier offers an OK amount of legroom, but the
headroom isnt brilliant. Can anyone recommend......?
Thanks
Alan T.
|
1228.74 | The big Vauxhalls are good | LARVAE::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, MS BackOffice Centre, UK | Mon May 15 1995 22:57 | 18 |
| 6'6", 36 to 37" inside leg, and a tall trunk as well....
I picked the Omega to get the head room.
The GLS saloon with sunroof, and I was hitting the roof (but only just)
The GLS estate (with sun roof) that I have at present while my car is
in the garage is OK - with 3/4" clearance on the head.
I actually picked for the base model saloon - which comes without a
sunroof - and if you can afford the airconditioning you won't need a
sunroof.
In the Omega I find I drive with the seat right down, but one notch
forward from fully back - the first car that I have had that is not
fully back.
Just driven 800 miles in 3 days - very comforatble cars.
Cheers, Chris
|
1228.75 | Get a rag-top | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue May 23 1995 23:08 | 15 |
|
Alan, get a soft top, then you can have the top down and not have to
worry 8*)
On a more serious note it's great to hear from you and know you are
still about!
I had an Omega on demo from Vauxhall very nice car with more headroom
than most I've driven lately, phone Wadham kennings of reading on 01734
394394 and speak to Peter Owen if he's got one he'll oblige if not then
he'll put you on to Vauxhall fleet demo's who are also most obliging
and have just about every model at their disposal, they let me have one
for a week! Very nice car but a tad juicy and a tad expensive for me.
Richard(young@wlo)
|
1228.76 | Advice for cars for vertically extended people. | CHEFS::TREVENNOR_A | A child of init | Wed Apr 02 1997 11:32 | 25 |
|
Hi All,
I'm due for a car replacement in about 8 months and rather
than just following on from what I have got now I thought I'd like to
ask around a bit for some advice about what might suit me better. I
currently have a Vectra TD/GLX which I've been quite happy with except
that it has (ever so slightly) less room in it than the Cavalier and it
suffers a lot of rolling and wind noise (even when rolling in Neutral)
over 60-70 MPH (depends on the day and the surface). Good MPG (about 45
by my guesstimate). So: Advice please? My requirements are (in
preferential order):
1) Must offer more internal space than Vectra (I am 6' 5").
2) Good MPG - quite happy to get Diesel again.
3) Quiet runner.
4) Good sound system.
5) Must not have the **stoopid** and dangerous combined washer/wiper
system that Vauxhall always use.
Regards
Alan T.
|
1228.77 | | BIS6::BROWN | | Wed Apr 02 1997 13:25 | 23 |
| Well I'm 6'4" myself, so I know the problems well.
I am very happy with my Omega CD. I have heard mixed comments on the
TD variants, so you may want to solicit input from those in the know.
As mentioned elsewhere in this conference, the ventilation system
leaves a lot to be desired. I'm not sure of your complaint with regard
to the washer/wiper system, but I haven't killed anyone yet. The head
and legroom is excellent, and there's quite good legroom behind me even
with the seat all the way back. The boot space is OK, the spare wheel
and rear drive detract from what could be a very useful bootspace.
Road and wind noise is low enough to carry on normal conversations.
Sound system is OK (I have single CD, but boot mounted is an option).
I can't say I've ever needed controls on the steering column.
My second choice would have been a Xantia, but you need to try the
exact seat/roof combination before making any decision there.
Fianlly a question.....
Have you ever flown charter flights, and if so, how did you manage to
get them to take out the seat in front??????
Chris
|
1228.78 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Wed Apr 02 1997 14:30 | 14 |
| I'll second the Omega on leg-room. Normally when I get into a strange
(?) car I set the seat back as far as it goes and it is then in the
right position - no fancy jiggling about.
The Omega goes just too far back (but then I'm only 6'0") and with the
hight control lowered even my ex-Volvo-drivers trilby would fit:-)
The ventilation is *ra* - only the AC will keep the screen clear some
days, even in winter.
The Estate has a lot of space in the back.
Jc
|
1228.79 | Thanks and more | CHEFS::TREVENNOR_A | A child of init | Wed Apr 02 1997 18:22 | 24 |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the opinions so far:
Re: Chris's question about charter flights, yes I did two. No they
didn't take the seats out! I suffered a lot on the first trip, but on
the outward leg of the second journey I got a front seat and on the
return the thing was so empty I could have sat anywhere! I did fly
Virgin Atlantic to Boston and it took my legs three days to stop
aching. Never again.
The Wash/Wipe complaint. It's a cold morning AND/OR Alan has not filled
his screen washer bottle in a while. Alan's screen gets a little fogged
and Alan squirts the lever in the column, but no liquid is sprayed on
the screen. However, the same lever also initiates three or four cycles
of wiping, so the dirt on the screen is smeared across the screen most
excellently leaving a film of greasy mess through which it is very
difficult to see clearly. Hmm said a Vauxhall man I spoke to about this
once (back in Cavalier days) "I can't really see why you'd want a
seperate switch for the squirter." Perhaps he'd never driven a Vauxhall
in the real world?
AT
|
1228.80 | Don't all cars do that ? | 45862::16.194.208.3::warder.reo.dec.com::sharkeya | Who am I now ? | Wed Apr 02 1997 18:25 | 6 |
| I thought all cars did that nowadays. Every one I have had has done that.
I have a Laguna Diesel and the room is fine for a 6 footer with the seat
lowered.
Alan
|
1228.81 | | BIS6::BROWN | | Thu Apr 03 1997 10:35 | 15 |
| I drove my Omega in temperatures well below zero through the last
winter, and the washers never froze once. I did have some problems
whilst the jet burst through the 6" of snow which had been deposited on
the bonnet, but I don't think I can blame Vauxhall for that, and in any
case, the wind blowing the loose snow off the top was sufficient to
clear the screen.
With the Cavalier I had between 90 and 93, I have not so fond memories
of stopping every now and again to throw snow over the screen when the
washers used to freeze on a regular basis (until I filled the washer
bottle with almost neat fairy liquid!).
Chris
|
1228.82 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Thu Apr 03 1997 12:21 | 11 |
| (rathole alert)
I found that screenwash is much cheaper (per amount needed to prevent
the bottle freezing) in the French hypermarkets than in Halfords. Now
I bring home a couple of gallons along with the booze before Christmas.
The continental variety seems to keep ice-free at much lower
temperature than the UK variety.
Jc
|
1228.83 | Don't go over your limit! | CHEFS::MOAKESR | | Thu Apr 03 1997 15:48 | 11 |
|
>> I found that screenwash is much cheaper (per amount needed to prevent
>> the bottle freezing) in the French hypermarkets than in Halfords.
>> Now I bring home a couple of gallons along with the booze before
>> Christmas.
I wonder if customes regard it as an import of an alcoholic beverage?
Some of the screenwash seems to conatin a lot of methanol!
Richard
|
1228.84 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Thu Apr 03 1997 17:20 | 6 |
| >>import of an alcoholic beverage?
But it is for personal use guv!
Jc
|
1228.85 | | BIS6::BROWN | | Fri Apr 04 1997 09:53 | 3 |
| But I hope not for personal consumption!
C
|
1228.86 | Loads of space | CHEFS::SURPLICEK | | Thu Apr 17 1997 12:43 | 23 |
| A Galaxy diesel model will fit the bill.
All-in-all, very comformable for the taller person
Loads of leg room - I am tall and slide the seat forward!
Loads of headroom
Adjustable length and height steering column
Adjustable height arm rest
Economy
Beats Peugeot 405 diesel estate
Room
can turn the same car from a 7 seater to a 3 seater
very adaptable, also useful and usable height for load
Quietness
well...next to no wind noise
...but you will notice the engine
Performance
sedate up o around 50-60
then it finds its legs
loves hill climbing
-Ken
|