T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1204.1 | How much had you insured it for? | IOSG::MITCHELL | Elaine | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:15 | 10 |
|
If your Mini was in better condition than 'book' price, then for an
insurance company to accept liability for that amount, the car would
have had to have been insured for an 'agreed value'. eg my Riley Elf,
because it was 20 years old, could only be insured for it's re-sale
value after it had been seen by an assessor.
I would guess that you might be able to argue a bit with the insurance
company, but I would doubt if you would get them to give you what you
think it was worth.
|
1204.2 | You rarely win with insurers! | CRATE::SAXBY | Is this personal or what? | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:19 | 6 |
|
What will the damage cost YOU (not the insurer) to get repaired?
If it's less than the 550 - 15% take the money and smile!
Mark
|
1204.3 | Advice | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:45 | 9 |
| First, you should be claiming from the other bloke's insurance, not your own.
Second, unless you have explicitly insured your car for more than the "average"
price that age/type of car costs, the insurers won't pay any more.
Third, if you want to get the car repaired, you should be able to get it done
quite a bit less than the "official" estimate of �500. I suggest agreeing to
their settlement (~�470), keep the "salvage" and use the money to get it fixed.
Scott
|
1204.4 | It will cost me... | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:52 | 12 |
| ref 1204.2
Mark,
According to Ralph's Motors it will cost about �550 to repair
this means if I take the money its going to cost me approx �80 to
get the car back to the same condition as it was at the time of
the accident. For an accident that wasn't my fault this seems to
rough justice!!
Cheers....Norm Pettet
|
1204.5 | some answers | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Thu Aug 30 1990 13:03 | 13 |
| Ref: 1204.3
Apparently any claim is settled by my own insurance company
then,as the accident wasn't my fault,they claim the money back from
the other insurance company.
My Mini is "above average" condition so I suspect they use some
sort of book which determines "average" condition value and use
that figure.
I might try and hold out for a little more money but it certainly
looks like I'll have to take the money and repair it myself. :-(
Cheers....Norm Pettet
|
1204.6 | | COMICS::FISCHER | Y'can't touch this | Thu Aug 30 1990 13:15 | 4 |
| I wouldn't pay �900 for a 1977 mini.
Ian
|
1204.7 | Won't pay ? Then replace it for me... | ESDV00::MUDAN | The Tiger of Bengal... | Thu Aug 30 1990 13:27 | 13 |
|
When my Mini Special, the 25th or 30th Anniversary Model, was written
off, my insurance company gave me the same hassle. They just wouldn't
pay me 'the going rate' so I eventually asked them to find me a 'like
replacement'.
Of course this wasn't possible ( limited edition, very few for sale,
mine had low mileage, excellent condition etc...) so they coughed up
what I originally wanted ;-)
Worth trying, Norm ?
|
1204.8 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Thu Aug 30 1990 17:55 | 3 |
| Why not give the Insurance Department a ring? Doug Arnold is the
manager, and if he can't give you five minutes advice on how to deal
with insurance companies, nobody can.
|
1204.9 | Shop around | COMICS::HWILLIAMS | | Thu Aug 30 1990 18:24 | 13 |
| Norm,
I don't think tha Ralph's would give you the best quote. when I
scraped my Cavalier ( a six inch by 1 inch deep scrape on the rear
wing) Ralph's quoted me a price of about �450 (new wing etc...)
But a garage local to my Dad, knocked out the scrape, filled it and
then resprayed the wing. cost was �80.
To be fair to Ralph's both PHH and Hertz require repairs to as new
standard, and so for lease cars you can't beat Ralph's.
So shop around.
Huw.
|
1204.10 | Pass the yellow pages | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Fri Aug 31 1990 09:51 | 7 |
| Huw,
Its worth thinking about. I'll let you know the outcome in due
course. Many thanks for your replies.
Cheers....Norm Pettet
|
1204.11 | An Opinion | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Fri Aug 31 1990 14:06 | 16 |
| Given that you appear to have claimed on your own insurance for
damage caused entirely by someone else there's little hope.
If in doubt in cases like this call in someone who specialises
in the area (insurance assessors) to make sure you get your just
deserves.
What about the provision of a car during repair, the waste of your
time, loss of amenity etc. etc., there are masses of things that
the man in the street doesn't know about - but if you claim off
your own insurance that's tantamount to admission of at least some
blame.
I think you've made the fatal mistake but why?
-John
|
1204.12 | to be continued... | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Fri Aug 31 1990 17:05 | 12 |
| ref:-1
John,
I asked my insurance company why the claim went through them
and they said that they handled my claim and then reclaimed the
moneys back from the guilty parties insurance. My No-Claims-Bonus
is safe and intact.
Cheers....Norm Pettet
|
1204.13 | Let them do the work. | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Fri Aug 31 1990 17:10 | 5 |
|
This sounds like normal procedure. You basically let the insurers fight
over the money, part of what you pay for is this service.
Mark
|
1204.14 | | ANNECY::MATTHEWS | M+M Enterprises. Thats the CATCH | Fri Aug 31 1990 17:20 | 5 |
| re: .12
Your NCB is safe and intact as long as a settlement has been reached
between the companies by the time you come to renew your policy. If not,
your NCB suffers. This has happened to me, and it took two years to get it
sorted out !!! Be warned ...
|
1204.15 | Not quite as simple as that | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Fri Aug 31 1990 18:39 | 22 |
| Ahh but -
Disregarding this particular case for the moment.
If you claim on your own insurance for someone elses accident
then the terms are strictly governed by the terms of the
agreement ie. all that small print that you never bothered to
read. These vary widely but are inevitably going to be restrictive
in comparison with taking the issue up with the other party under
common law.
The Insurance Cos aren't terribly interested in deciding whose
fault it was and if in any doubt will clobber both parties under
their 'Knock for Knock' agreements. These arrangements are made
to cut beaurocracy and save costs, and where there's doubt over
blame not an unreasonable idea.
But if your case is 100% you'll do better to avoid all the small
print and go direct, after all the other person caused the all
the hassle and should pay for it.
-John
|
1204.16 | | BOOKIE::DAVEY | | Fri Aug 31 1990 20:41 | 12 |
| Except that if you ignore your insurers and go for the other person's
insurance company on what *appears* to be a straightforward case, you won't
necessarily get the settlement (100%) that you're after. The other party's
insurers will play all sorts of stunts to try to get out of paying the full
amount as they know that you (probably) don't have the legal experts backing
you and willing to go to court for what is probably a relatively small sum.
(I was hit by a truck which pulled out dangerously and illegally in front of
me in stopped traffic, then scarpered; I got no witnesses but got his reg.
no., etc; I ended up with a 50% settlement on a new bumper and touch-up which
was still better than losing my no-claims).
John
|
1204.17 | Have you got the tome and money to argue! | IOSG::MITCHELL | Elaine | Mon Sep 03 1990 09:18 | 10 |
|
I was once hit by a motorbike (while I was stationary) so, on the
surface, a straighforward case of 100% his fault. I only had tpft
insurance, so took up the case myself, and eventually got a soliciter
in. _But_ after 3 years, and the case coming to the small claims court
3 times, (only to be told that they had more important things to
decide) the other insurance company offered me �375 + costs, as against
the �500 I was claiming. I took the money because I was totaly fed up
with the whole thing, and I couldn't afford to risk ending up with
costs!
|
1204.18 | And finally..... | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Tue Oct 09 1990 09:46 | 15 |
| Outcome:-
I accepted the �470 offered by the insurance company and I retained
the salvage. Ralph's Motors repaired the car and resprayed the rear
section for �462. Overall the car is now back to its original condition
except I'll have to "T Cut" the rest of the car to match the new
paintwork. Obviously insurance companys are only interested in newish
cars but I wonder what would have been the outcome if the car was
a "classic" car such as a Cooper-S or perhaps a Stag?
Many thanks for all the replies,
Cheers....Norm Pettet
|
1204.19 | Insurance for classics. | SUBURB::SAXBYM | Really Manic Information Centre | Tue Oct 09 1990 10:14 | 11 |
|
Basically, if you own a 'classic' car you ought to arrange an
'Agreed Value' policy. In this way your car is covered for a
guaranteed amount.
You need to show some evidence of the value you've asked for
, but providing you are not unreasonable it is not a problem.
Do NOT attempt to insure a classic car on a 'normal' policy.
Mark
|
1204.20 | Insurance nightmare | MACNAS::JDOOLEY | A nation once again | Fri Oct 12 1990 10:45 | 8 |
| I'd say that wass essential!
I was watching a programme on a Hispano Suiza rally in Spain and the
commentator mentioned that the cars cost 2500 pounds for the chassis,
plus roughly 1500 for the body in 1920 pounds!!!
On the basis that a 100,000 pound house of today could be bought for
1000 pounds at that time he "guesstimated" that some of the cars on
display could be worth 400,000 pounds today!!!
|