T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
296.177 | Home Sentry | CAVEAT::WOLFE | Lee Wolfe | Thu Nov 13 1986 13:35 | 27 |
|
A friend of mine remembered seeing an add or product desription
for a 'Whole Home Sentry' in a magazine recently but now can't find
it again.
He's trying to find a home sentry to install at his house on
the Cape. It was just converted, (insulation and heating), into
a year_round cottage. What he's looking for specifically is a unit
that is comprised of addon style sensors for various functions which
plug into the main unit. If any of the sensors trip the main unit,
which connects to his phone, dials his number and plays a recorded
message letting him know somethings wrong.
The specific one he needs has a temperature sensor which can
be adjusted to a specific setting. He can live without the smoke
detector and the intruder features. He primarily wants to be
informed if the furnace dies so he can jump in his car and get there
before the pipes freeze. He plans to go to the Cape every other
weekend or so now that it's winterized, so closing it for the season
and draining all the systems just won't work.
If anyone knows the brand name of this unit or where they can
be purchased please let me know. (NorthEast Security of Framingham
- Natick will design and install one and then lease you it's service
but it's expensive, ~$100 a month after initial installation costs.)
Thanks - Lee
|
296.178 | Nutone makes just what you want! | DRUID::CHACE | | Thu Nov 13 1986 13:56 | 9 |
| I believe Nutone makes exactly what your friend wants for ~$100-150.
It connects to your phone and will call any number if certain
conditions occur. One of them which is built-in is one for low temp.
I just saw it advertised somewhere, if I can find it I'll let you
know. But as far as availability is concerned Maynard Supply and
many other electrical supply houses carry Nutone.
I remembered this one because I am interested in one for the same
reason.
Kenny
|
296.179 | Not Nutone, Duofone | DRUID::CHACE | | Thu Nov 13 1986 14:06 | 10 |
| Correction it's not Nutone but Duofone. The particular unit I
saw is now sold by Radio Shack. It's new in their 1987 Cat. and
sells for 99.95. It monitors for electricity being on, if the temp.
is within preset limits, and listens for loud noises. If any of
those conditions occur it phones continuously until message is
received.
It's just what I've wanted, the reason I haven't bought it yet is
because I'm waiting for it to go on sale?!
Kenny
|
296.180 | Radio Shack has it | KANE::ABRAMS | | Thu Nov 13 1986 15:36 | 9 |
|
One of the sensor alerts that is available is through radio shack.
The sensor will call up to four telephone numbers. It will monitor
burglar and smoke alarms, power failures and temperature limits
which you set. It costs 99.95 and can be found on page 145 of the
new Radio Shack cat. (it also has battery backup)
george
|
296.181 | Thanks!! | CAVEAT::WOLFE | Lee Wolfe | Fri Nov 14 1986 13:16 | 9 |
| re. all
Ken, George,
That sounds like exactly the one he's looking for! Thanks *very*
much. I'll check Radio Shack on my way home tonite!
Lee
|
296.1 | Try Radio Shack | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 02 1987 12:39 | 12 |
| I am seriously considering the Radio Shack system. I convinced
the local RS store manager to let me borrow the manual. I brought
it home and read it cover-to-cover and also thoroughly checked out
the main unit at the store. I also priced all the acces. and recently
purchased their infrared unit for another application. I really
did,nt see anything wrong with any of it and was quite impressed
with the "price/perforamnce" compared to the socalled "professional"
systems.....although I have not yet purchased the system I have
purchased a lot of other RS "telephone gizmos" and am quite satisfied.
Any first hand experience out there with the RS security system?
|
296.2 | Happy with ours | TROLL::GUERRA | | Tue Jun 02 1987 13:28 | 18 |
| My wife and I had a security system installed in our house a few
months ago. It includes switches at the doors, breaker bars on the
cellar windows and the infrared things-on-the-wall. It is monitored
by a security company in Worcester. It can send messages for fire,
break-in and medical emergency. The control panels can be used as
panic buttons by pressing two pre-assigned buttons simultaneously.
It has its flaws, but any system has them. And as long as the crook
(which is what we are trying to protect against most of the time)
doesn't know what those are, you stand a good chance of having your
property well protected. Besides, we are not what you would call
the Louvre or Fort Knox. It has a battery back up that will work
for about six hours after power interruption, too. You can also
get discount on your insurance, but only if it is monitored (I think).
Bottom line, we are pleased and I feel a lot better about my wife
and daughter having to be home alone in a fairly isolated neighborhood.
We are still waiting for the letter from the security company so
we can get our discount on our insurance premium.
|
296.3 | EVERYTHING RS Sells is junk. | DELNI::OSTROM | Andy Ostrom Networks Mktg. 272-7132 | Tue Jun 02 1987 15:28 | 3 |
| Radio Shack = R.S. = Rat Shack = Rat Sh*t
my $.02
|
296.4 | Opinions make the world go 'round | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 02 1987 16:22 | 2 |
| I guess we're all entitled to our $.02 I have had good luck.
|
296.5 | Be Alarmed | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | | Wed Jun 03 1987 10:03 | 23 |
|
We had a security system installed in our house a few years ago.
I highly recommend the type of security system which has an fire
detector as well as an alarm system. I also suggest that it is the type
connected directly to the local police/fire station. Ours contained
a tape recorder which automaticly contacted the police station when
the alarm or smoke detector when off. My feeling is, if you're
not around when there's a fire, at least the firemen will be there
before your house burns to the ground. Typical smoke detectors
will "go off" when there's a fire, but what good is that if you're
not home?
The system had to be registered with the local police department.
If you activate the alarm by accident (my wife did this once, police
got there in less than 5 minutes!) more than 3 times a year, they
make you pay a fine. There is a way to abort the message before
it is sent to the police but she did'nt know how at the time.
Ours also had a "panic" button which activated the alarm, it was
located in the bedroom. It also had a mechanism on the stairs which
activated the alarm when stepped on.
Chip
|
296.6 | debugging it is the hardest part | NOVA::BWRIGHT | | Wed Jun 03 1987 11:09 | 26 |
| re:.1
I purchased the radio shack security system and my wife and I installed
it during the construction of our new house. I'm fairly happy with
it thus far. I do have "bugs" in a couple of the circuits, but
haven't had time to investigate the cause. I can bypass these
buggy circuits to still give me partial security.
The main problem I have with this system (and it would probably
be the same for any system) is an easy way to debug the thing once
the walls are up. A co-worker installed the same unit and she did
a smart thing. Wires were run from each window to the control panel
area. They are attached to a supplementary bank of terminal pairs
that hook these window circuits up into one large series circuit.
When there is a bug in this circuit, it is easy to remove individual
windows from the circuit until the culprit is found. Of course,
the more wire that you run, the greater the chance that a wire gets
hit by a sheetrock screw.
We simply ran the wire from the control panel to the first window
in the circuit, then window to window. Made running the wire easier,
but now the only way to debug the circuit is to remove sensors one
at a time from the windows. No wonder I haven't spent much time
debugging!
Bill
|
296.7 | | PARITY::SZABO | | Wed Jun 03 1987 11:19 | 6 |
| Re: a few back...
Concerning insurance discounts, I was told by Metpay that to qualify,
all you need are deadbolt locks and fire extinguishers (assuming
you already have smoke detectors). They didn't elaborate on security
systems adding to the discount.
|
296.8 | Monitoring | PARITY::GALLAGHER | | Wed Jun 03 1987 14:08 | 35 |
|
RE .7 *and a few back*
We installed a system after being broken into three years ago, and
had to supply Metpay with a copy of the receipt from the company
that installed the system before they would give us a discount.
It was funny, because I wondered about that too (I read their
requirements for this insurance discount), since I had deadbolts
smoke detectors and a couple of fire extinguishers before the alarm
system. However, they would not give me a discount until I installed
the system.
Regarding a couple of other responses about direct call-in, versus
monitoring, I think that monitoring is probably a better way to
go, other than the fact that your local police department greatly
favors this approach. When we've inadverdently set off our alarm,
the company has always called within a couple of minutes. As I
see it, monitoring does a couple of things:
Doesn't tie up the police with a false, if you've set it off
(both the people and the systems aren't foolproof; it happens).
In a small town, with a small police department, this can be
a pain.
Also makes the police accountable for their response. When
your system calls into the monitoring service, most systems
send a message with a time stamp, zone that went into alarm,
etc. In many cases that information could be useful.
It's not overly expensive. We pay $27 a quarter (same folks
who installed the system), and that will get you the monitoring,
and notification, meaning that if my alarm goes off when I'm
home, they'll call the police, then call a series of numbers
we've given them (until they reach someone) to tell us that
our alarm has gone off.
|
296.9 | something about everything | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with you. | Wed Jun 03 1987 14:58 | 32 |
| insurance - discounts only apply to systems that automatically notify
the police by wire or by phone.
radio shack - I selected radio shack over competing Mountain West
products for price/performance and SIMPLICITY.
multiple zones - multiple zones are excellent not only for debugging
but for features too: some zones can be delayed, others
can be instant.
debugging - I installed my own shorting panel such that when you
push a button all loops but one are shorted out: if
"loop" light goes on, that circuit is ok. This has saved
me many a trip to the basement, barn, garage, & back door!
false alarms - some cities and towns charge $$ in fines for false
alarms: be sure the system is understood by everyone
in the family and not so sensitive that the wind on
a curtain or the dog pushing on the door will activate!
dead bolts - this is the MAIN FEATURE of my system: the loop is
only closed when the bolts-are-thrown -- there is a
button imbedded in the bolt hole. This means that
the system is well hidden and you can use it to check
to see that everything is locked, not JUST closed!
security - the best security is alert neighbors! They see more than
the best system; and you should tell them what to do
if the alarm goes off!
Rick
Merrill
|
296.10 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Wed Jun 03 1987 23:40 | 18 |
| I think the sticker on the window saying that the house has an alarm
system is the most functional part of the whole system.
My neighbors house was broken into about a year ago complete with
alarm system(no stickers) and the alarm was screaming away 10 hours
later when they got home. What good does an alarm system do if it
dosent call the police? Here in Colorado it is illegal to have a
dumb system call too many false alarms. Now if you go thru an alarm
service that has its own center that is called and then investigates
and reports to the police you have a working combo.
The idea about using stickers only came from a cop friend of mine
and worked fine thru a rash of breakins in my area. I would like
to add that homes on either side of me were broken into but mine
was skipped.
I still think paranoia and a 12 gauge work better.
-jerry
|
296.27 | Burglar Alarms | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Mon Jul 13 1987 09:46 | 25 |
| Seems to be a new topic if note 1111 is correct...
Any thoughts on burglar alarms?
My own experiences are limited - ADT was advertising a system on the
radio heavily about a year ago. I got the literature - it would have
run about $1500 for a medium size house, including hookup to their
central station so the police can be alerted. The price seems high and
the system seems to be 1950s technology - basically wire running to all
doors and windows, magnetic reed switches, etc. Big pain to install.
Sears (Yeah, ugh) has a system by Black and Decker which would probably
be under $500 (no central station hookup, though). This system has no
wires and uses digitally-encoded ultrasonic signals to communicate
between the various door and window sensors and the main control
module. All kinds of fancy options and features, including battery
backup. This system seems to be more state of the art and is obviously
cheaper and easier to install.
Aren't there also systems that detect motion via ultrasonic something
or other? Are these any good?
Only other input I have is from a police officer who said that most
of the home alarms they answer are false, mainly due to low quality
and or improperly installed/setup systems.
|
296.28 | | ISTG::SHOREY | | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:27 | 22 |
| the guy across the street from my parents something which is tied
into the police dept. about a month ago the thing malfunctioned
and went off. we called the police when they didn't show up after
about 5 minutes of waiting, and they said they were aware of it,
and would have a car on the way shortly. 10 minutes later (15 total)
they showed up.
since, as .0 stated, most of the time these things go off it is
a malfunction, do the police take them seriously? i could have
robbed this guys house between the time i called the police and
the time they showed up. my father has one of the old EICO systems
in his house, not connected to anything. to me it's just as effective
if the police ignore their warnings...
maybe just the warning stickers from radio shack is enough to keep
a burglar away?
can somebody tell us more about how the police are supposed to respond
to alarms, and how the alarms are tied into the police dept? i'd
be pretty upset if i spent all that money and they ignored me.
bs (WARNING - trained attack turtle on premises!)
|
296.29 | Monitored System Details | CLOVAX::MARES | | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:51 | 36 |
| We have a whole house security system, installed professionally
and tied in to a monitoring service. Upon detection of an event,
the system turns on the exterior siren and dials the monitoring
service. The system reports the type of event (breakin, smoke/fire
or panic button). The monitoring service waits one minute, then
calls the appropriate authorities (police, fire, police).
For the cases when the detected event is a false alarm or due to
operator error, we call the monitoring service as soon as the alarm
system hangs up the phone, give them our account number and password
(just like logging in) and they either do not call the authorities
or call whomever they just called to cancel their original request.
For this monitoring service, we pay $18 per month. Our home is
somewhat isolated and the $18 is well worth the security it provides
my wife when I am away.
By the way, our community has an ordinance about the occurrence
of false alarms from these type of systems. You are allowed three
false alarms (lifetime). After the third, you pay $35 per police
response and some other amount per fire response.
Also, upon notification of our home insurance carrier of the
installation of a monitored security system, we received a flat
5% discount on our premium.
Editorial: being particular about home improvements and the like,
I did not care for the quality of the installation of our or friends'
security systems -- it is obvious that they were added on. I would
highly recommend your building it in to new construction (at least
wiring and sensors) even if you do not install the monitoring system
right off the bat. Our system is a combination of remote transmitters
and wiring -- effective, but not always pretty.
Randy
|
296.30 | It isn't a big job | CLUSTA::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Mon Jul 13 1987 16:11 | 36 |
| My house was robbed last November. I can't say we weren't warned,
though. After we moved in last May, our neighbor said our house had
been hit 3 times in four years. The house is not very visible from the
neighbors, so the burglars didn't have to worry about being seen.
We had discussed getting an alarm the night before we got hit.
In talking with the police, they said it is usually kids. The best
alarm is one that makes a LOT of noise but that a hookup to police/service
is sometimes useful (e.g. if your house is isolated), but not always
necessary. They also said that dogs are usually not a deterrant.
Ours is to friendly, so we knew it wouldn't be. They said they
had handled a recent call where a Doberman had to be destroyed
because the intruders had just kicked the hell out of him. I'd
bet a Rochwielder (sp?) would do the trick, though.
We called around and got estimates ranging between $950 and $1400
(we have a 3-br. Colonial w/2-car garage under). We ended up going
with Mellonics Alarms in Chelmsford (250-1192) who came in with
one of the lower quotes. He charged $125 for each window/door or
motion detector plus parts. We have been very pleased with the work
he did. He loves to compete in bids with guys like ADT and American
Alarms, because he uses the same equipment (mostly NAPCO, I think)
they do but he doesn't have a high overhead. Our installation has
two infrared motion detectors, magnetic switches on the garage doors
and basement windows and recessed switches on some doors and windows.
I stayed home the day he installed. This is definitely something
a good DIYer could handle. It's a matter of getting the right
equipment, planning the proper zones, snaking a lot of wires,
drilling a few holes, installing the boxes, and testing it out.
If anyone is interested in the details of installation, I'd be happy
to put them in a response here.
Rob
|
296.31 | oh yes, I forgot | CLUSTA::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Mon Jul 13 1987 16:27 | 21 |
| Many towns no longer allow hooking up alarm systems to the police
station. Our system is hooked up to a central service in Waltham
and it works very well. We've had one false alarm due to a faulty
switch (not the installers fault), a couple where we've accidently
set it off, and once when the cleaning service set it off. If we
accidently set it off and we call the central site fast enough,
they won't call in the police. An exception to this is the "ambush
code" the system will send in certain cases. They immediately call
the police on that one. In addition to calling the police, they
attempt to reach an authorized individual to let them know that
the alarm has gone off (e.g. me at work, my wife at work, wife's
parents). After the police have been notified, however, we
have to call them and tell them it is a false alarm.
They still come out, but they don't burn any rubber getting there.
Each time they've come, it's been within 5-10 minutes.
The service runs $12-$15 per month (not exactly cheap), but our
house is fairly isolated and we can't rely on neighbors to hear
the alarm and call it in.
Rob
|
296.32 | behind the scenes at the PD | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Mon Jul 13 1987 18:48 | 35 |
| Re .1 (what's at the police station, and how do they respond?)
I work for two police departments, so this is coming from the source.
At the police station is an alarm panel, usually with two indicators
per alarm. Each alarm is numbered, and the dispatcher has to look
up in a book the location of the triggered alarm. Some towns just
give the alarm number to the cruisers, which then have to look it up
in a book (this is to avoid tipping off burglers with scanners).
The two indicators are for determining whether the alarm has really
been tripped, or is just malfunctioning (some alarms can't distinguish
between the two events).
As for how the police respond to alarms, obviously if this is the 28th
time this month that alarm's gone off, they are not going to take it
seriously, They'll still respond (by law, they have to), but at a
reduced rate. On the other hand, if it's 2:30 in the morning and the
people have called to let the police know that they're going away for
the week, they'll probably send at least two cars right over to check
it out. But, who knows how far away the nearest free car is!
If you do decide to go the DIY route with an alarm installation, check
with your local PD beforehand. They may have regulations on how often
your autodialer can call, how long it can "hold" their line, special
numbers to call, rules on how long an outside audible alarm can sound
before it resets, number of false alarms permitted per month/year
before the fines start, etc.
Even if they have no regulations, it's a good idea to leave them a
number where you can be reached should the alarm go off. Be nice to
your neighbors -- ever listened to an alarm bell sounding for several
hours? I once was called out with the local fire department to put
a ladder up the side of this nice guy's house, and cut the cable
leading to his alarm bell. The police were getting tired of getting
calls, and decided 12:30am was late enough to wait for this guy to
get home. Of course, he came home as soon as we cut the cable!
|
296.11 | NAMES OF SYSTEMS | WILVAX::LIONETTA | | Tue Jul 14 1987 12:46 | 13 |
| Hi,
I'm new to this file, hope I don't do anything to break the rules,
I did read them!
Anyways, I am contemplating an alarm and was wondering if you would
be willing to supply names of systems and cost. I am particularly
interested in the type monitored by a company ($27 a quarter seems
reasonable) Is this the ADT system?
Thanks in advance,
/bernadette
|
296.33 | Tell nobudy nuttin | AKOV04::WILLIAMS | | Tue Jul 14 1987 13:39 | 7 |
| Every good book I've read on the subject has stated you should
not notify the police when you're going to be away. Notify a neighbor
instead. Also, don't notify the folks at the alarm service. The
more people you tell the better the chance of being ripped off (cops
and alarm sevice employees are people too).
Douglas
|
296.12 | NAPCO equipment | CLUSTA::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Wed Jul 15 1987 11:10 | 21 |
| ADT is one such company. American Alarms is another. I believe
both of these do their own monitoring. They are a little higher
priced for their installations than some of the smaller guys.
I think their monthly charges are fairly competive. Some of
the smaller guys also do their own monitoring, but I'd
recommend against using them.
The system I have was installed by an independent installer (see
my previous replies). He has an arrangement with ND Security Systems
in Waltham, where our system is set up to call. The installer
(Mellonics Alarms in Chelmsford) bills his clients and pays NDSS.
The service costs $15/mo. At leat I know that if the installer
goes out of business, the monitoring company will still be around.
The equipment in my system is made by NAPCO (total cost about $950).
The main controller comes in different models, depending on a couple
of special features and # of zones. They don't vary much in price.
The one we have has a ROM that the installer programmed to customize
the system as we desired (delay entry/exit times, panic codes, etc).
Rob
|
296.13 | Size and quality not directly related. | TROLL::GUERRA | | Wed Jul 15 1987 13:11 | 10 |
| I don't think the size of the company has anything to do with the
quality of the equipment or the service you get. Our system was
installed by a fairly new outfit out of Worcester (Basic Security
Systems) and I have no complaints about their equipment or service.
Right now the monitoring is being done by Security First in Worcester
but they will be getting their own system in a couple of months.
If they ever go out of business, all I have to do is contract with
another monitoring service that will be able to receive and understand
the signal from my equipment. All they have to do is reprogram my
equipment to dial their number and of course $bill$ me.
|
296.14 | Weak link in security systems | HAZEL::THOMAS | | Wed Jul 15 1987 14:16 | 7 |
| If you are using a security system with an auto-dialer, you should make
sure the phone line is not easily accessible outside the house. A
professional will cut the wires before breaking in. Another solution is
a leased line to the alarm company which will trip the alarm if the phone
line is cut. This is how most banks and commercial sytems are connected.
- Rich
|
296.15 | worth the risk? | CLUSTA::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Wed Jul 15 1987 14:38 | 17 |
| .-1 Leased line = $$$$$, right?
I also wondered about the need to make the telephone connection
difficult to access from outside the house. Does the telephone
company have anything to say about it? Do they even care?
You're right that a pro would probably cut the phone line. But
the pro would also figure out that there are motion detectors,
window/door switches, and a loud siren to go with a battery backup
to the alarm in case of power failure. This adds up to the thing
going off and making mucho noise, thus drawing attention from any
passerby's and neighbors, unless you are REALLY isolated.
Most pro's will probably move on to the next house. Unless, of
course, you've got something that they really want....
Rob
|
296.34 | Call the cops! | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Thu Jul 16 1987 14:31 | 20 |
| I disagree strongly with the statement that you shouldn't tell anyone
(neighbors are people, too!). Maybe my vision of the world is clouded
by my small town background. Yes, the police in Revere probably did
steal some cartons of cigarettes. But by notifying the PD that
you're not going to be around, they can cruise by the house more
often than usual, checking that the windows are all still down,
the phone and/or power wire hasn't been cut (thereby taking out
your mage-watt alarm siren and twenty-number autodialer), etc.
They'll also know who to call if they discover something wrong with
the house. I remember one case where the people were away; luckily,
they had notified the police. Early one winter morning, in checking
out the place, an officer noticed water pouring out from around the
garage doors (the garage was under the house). He called it in, got
the house opened up, and saved some serious damage. Turns out an
uninsulated water pipe in the unheated garage's ceiling had burst
due to the cold weather. Can you imagine coming home from vacation
to find a skating rink where you used to park the Subaru!?
Jim
|
296.35 | Who volunteers? | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Thu Jul 16 1987 14:43 | 4 |
| P.S. This note should really be merged with 1181. They're discussing
the same subject, only 1181 was earlier and has more replies.
Jim
|
296.36 | Nothing like a retired neighbor! | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Thu Jul 16 1987 14:45 | 12 |
| No security system or police drive bys could match the "watchful"
eye of the neighbor I have across the street! No monthly payments,
no false alarms. I just have to put up good shades.
Actual conversation:
Me: Last night some kid on a moped stopped in my driveway at 2 in
the morning and woke me up! I've got to get that fence back up.
Her: Geez, I don't know how I missed that.
|
296.37 | Retired neighbors a great thing! | CSCMA::KNORR | The Victory Bell has cobwebs! | Thu Jul 16 1987 17:44 | 0 |
296.38 | Good neighbors are the best protection | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Thu Jul 16 1987 21:43 | 10 |
| re the last two.
I have retired couples living on both sides and behind me.
They all watch my house like hawks as well as helping me keep
up(I live alone) by turning my water off for me after I have gone
to work. I belive it impossible to get to my porch without
at least one of them seeing you. They are all a part of neighborhood
watch and that makes it even better.
-j
|
296.39 | Ain't no neighbors. That's why I bought it | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO1-1/D42 381-1264 | Fri Jul 17 1987 09:43 | 23 |
| The situation that prompted the base note was a breakin at a summer
home in the middle of nowhere, and I mean nowhere. It's not within an
incorporated town, so the police consists of the sheriff, who gets to
cover everything in the county that's not a city or town. A phone
hookup is useless since the response time would be so long.
On the other hand the crime rate is very low in this place.
Professional thieves are nonexistent, so basically I'm trying to
protect against kids, vagrant clamdiggers, etc (the stuff taken
in the break indicates that this is indeed the "audience" for the
alarm).
I'm opting for motion detectors connected to a very loud bell (it
carries over the water and can be heard despite the isolation) plus
some intimidating looking stickers and red lights on the outdoor
keyswitch for the system.
I think the big step function in alarm costs comes when you are
trying to prevent someone who really wants in from getting in (pros).
Does anyone have any additional ideas for the winter? It's likely
to be unoccupied for 4 months.
|
296.40 | REAL protection? | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with u,... | Fri Jul 17 1987 14:06 | 8 |
| For Unoccupied homes there is one system that has always succeeded
in repelling unauthorized entry: 10 second tear gas cartridge!!
Unfortunately it appears to tick off burglars that they are liable
to torch the house on their next visit.
rmm
|
296.41 | find the burglar with the tin cup! | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Fri Jul 17 1987 16:18 | 29 |
|
I seem to recall an article in Popular Mechanics a few years ago about
their "dream" garage, complete with everything the average geek would need
to build Indy 500 winners in.....
Thier security systems were three levels, as the garage was built
somewhere within the confines of New York City.......
First level was good locks and deadbolts.....windows fully covered and
grills installed,etc.
Second level was a trip alarm such as we have been talking about
earlier here, bells, whistles, etc.
Third level, should you circumvent all that, was 4 of the quartz
halogen off road vehicle lights, output in excess of (maybe?) 75Kw each, or
some such incredible number. The idea beiing, should anyone get past
everything else, when the door was forced open before the alarm was
properly deactivated, the lights went on in a "blaze of glory".....the
police probably could have come by a half hour later and picked up the
blind burglar without any trouble....
Sounds like a viable idea to me, although the though of torching the
house is always a possibility. I helped rebuild such a case two years ago
for my boss after his old vacation camp was torched out of spite. You don't
want to break into that place now.....
Vic H
|
296.42 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Fri Jul 17 1987 16:50 | 3 |
| Somewhat in the same vein as .14, I've always thought that about
six 200db sirens going off in the area you don't want burglers
to get into would probably do it....
|
296.43 | Neh to tear gas | POP::SUNG | Dept. of Redundancy Dept. | Fri Jul 17 1987 17:06 | 6 |
| The problem with the teargas canisters is that tear gas is really
a suspension rather than a gas. After the tear gas settles, you
have this white stuff all over the place and it's a real mess to
clean up. The lights and sirens would be a cleaner solution.
-al
|
296.44 | another cleaner solution | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with u,... | Mon Jul 20 1987 11:08 | 0 |
296.45 | | MARTY::FRIEDMAN | | Mon Jul 20 1987 16:07 | 7 |
| Another good neighbor is a policman. We have a state trooper and
two town officers in the neighborhood. Although I get the normal
foot twitch response (gas pedal foot) when I pass the statie's blue
cruiser in his driveway--very nice looking Caprice, I might add--it
does give me a sense of security.
Marty
|
296.46 | take a bite outa crime | ARCHER::FOX | | Tue Jul 21 1987 18:16 | 12 |
| For those of you with neighbors... We held a 'crimewatch' meeting
at our house last year after the development was fully occupied.
A representative from the PD gives a little presentation and there
is a Q+A session, etc.
Although the information at the meeting was pretty much common sense,
having everyone meet everyone was well worth the effort (and the
mess from a dozen kids in the livingroom). Everyone now tends to
look out for each other more. There's a definate sense of security
around. We also have those signs posted saying this neighborhood
is protected by 'neighborhood watch'. A little corny, but if it's
enough to make some punk go somewhere else, what the hell?
John
|
296.47 | Corny things are ok... | LILAC::MKPROJ | REAGAN::ZORE | Wed Jul 22 1987 12:37 | 4 |
| There nothing wrong with "corny" things. Sometimes I think that
that's what this country needs a little more of.
Rich :-)
|
296.16 | Are alarms worth it? | PLDVAX::TRANDOLPH | | Wed Jul 22 1987 14:42 | 9 |
| My opinion:
If someone really wants to break in, they will, alarm or no alarm.
Spend your money on keeping them out. Of course, if your house has
windows like most do, this point is moot.
The most secure place I've lived in was an apartment on the 3rd
floor - the owner let me install my own deadbolt. The only way in
was a ladder to the window or an axe through the door. FWIW
-Tom R.
|
296.48 | wireless system sources? | NATASH::WEIGL | Turboferrets - racing for answers | Thu Oct 01 1987 13:58 | 11 |
|
Can people suggest sources for wireless systems in the Boston area?
I'm interested in putting in a system in an already-built house
but am not excited about 1500-2000$ for the installation.
Where can you get these things? Who makes them? Brand information,
etc. would be welcome. So far in this note, there's only been the
mention in .0 about the Sears/Black&Decker system.
Thanks,
Andy
|
296.49 | A plug for wired systems | MANANA::SCHNEIDER | Dennis Schneider | Thu Oct 01 1987 14:16 | 31 |
| I put a perimeter alarm system into my house 5 years ago - I used ADEMCO
components. It has yet to false - though we have had a tradesperson trigger
it by moving a door they weren't supposed to while we were out.
Based on all the war stories I'd heard, I didn't put in any motion sensors
and it's a wired system - no transmitters,etc.
I'd recommend that, unless there is NO WAY to do it, you use a wired system.
Copper wire doesn't wear out, grow old, run down, etc. The system is
intrinsically SIMPLE. It's almost impossible to fool it - in a good alarm
system with "SUPERVISION" (means that the sensor loops are watched for BOTH
OPENS and SHORTS), you can't short or break the sensor lines without
triggering the alarm.
Given the circumstances, I'd recommend that you use an Electronic Siren
plus an external strobe light mounted on the siren speaker - bells and sirens
do carry a long distance, but WHERE THEY COME FROM is hard to determine.
Also, DON'T use a keyswitch arming mechanism on the ouside of the house -
use a time delayed entry/exit scheme. If your property is as remote as you
say, a determined burglar could
just hack the switch out of the wall and disarm the system.
In general, a monitoring service is a good idea. Also, almost any decent
system will have an automatic bell cutoff after some fixed time interval.
One thing to watch: Some systems DISARM THEMSELVES once the bell cutoff
occurs! A thief just trips your alarm and runs off, waits a coupek hours,
and waltzes in...
Dennis
|
296.17 | phone co helpful. | CLUSTA::ELLIOTTE | | Wed Dec 23 1987 20:55 | 7 |
| Re .15, the phone company quite willingly installed our phones lines
up at the top of the house, with the electrical lines. Also installed
the boxes on the inside of the house. No additional cost over the
standard installation fee.
Any recommendations on monitoring firms? Names, please of firms
that might cover the Brookline/Milford/Hollis, NH area?
|
296.18 | Monitoring | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Thu Dec 24 1987 10:42 | 4 |
| In the Nashua area, try Abel Systems. They're in the book.
pbm
|
296.50 | Alarm advice | AKOV02::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Mon Jan 25 1988 15:39 | 40 |
| I am sorry that I missed this note on burglar alarms earlier.
Re: -2 Avoid wireless systems, even though they are cheaper. The
issue is the method on which an alarm is triggered. Do you have
a normally off system or a normally on system?
A normally off system, like most wireless systems, has nothing
happening unless there is a problem. Then an alarm is transmitted
to the receiver. The issue is that you won't know of a system failure,
such as a dead battery. The unit simply won't transmit. (Yes,
I know that some systems notify you when the alarm battery is low,
but that is not common and often doesn't work.)
A normally on system runs a current to all of the components in
the system. If there is a break in a connection, the alarm is tripped.
If a component fails, there is a false alarm. But, you know about
it.
I guess you need to ask, which is the worse problem, a FALSE POSITIVE
or a FALSE NEGATIVE (when something IS really happening).
I would recommend getting in touch with B & J Custom Alarms of
Chelmsford, 256-7230. They install and maintain the equipment and
will service anywehere in Eastern MA, NH and even Maine.
One thing to note about a monitoring service, it is cheaper for
them to wait a minute for you to call them than for anything else.
I would personally recommend:
1. They call you to see if there is a false alarm.
2. If there is no answer, a busy or if you cannot properly identify
yourself, they call the police and then a list of people such
as your office, a neighbor, a relative, etc.
3. Include smoke detectors. It is a good idea to have the fire
dept notified about that roast you left to burn via time bake.
Roger
|
296.183 | Motion detecting security lights | MAGIC1::BEAUDET | Beware...the Junk_Yard_Dog! | Tue Mar 15 1988 13:18 | 14 |
| Does anyone have any information on the latest line of infared motion
detecting security lights - these will turn on when sensing movement
inside a specific "protected" field...
Do they work?
How sensitive are they? Range?
Best brands?
Thanks...
|
296.184 | Heath/Zenith Units Work Well | FDCV03::PARENT | | Wed Mar 16 1988 10:23 | 17 |
| Lechmere had the Heath/Zenith unit on sale last week ($40.00) and
Bradlees has them this week (same price). We bought one last week
and were so pleased we bought another this week. I'm not the
technical brains in the family (my hubby is) but if I recall
correctly the field of vision is 110 degrees and the sensitivity
level is adjustable. It has a photocell so it isn't on all day,
has an override if you want to put the lights on, and came with
all the necessary hardware. There's a test mode for when you're
trying to determine the best angles, etc.
Since he's a EE I'll take his word for the technical virtues.
Overall, especially at the sale price, I think it's a good deal.
(And, in the words of Ronco..."it really, really works". We've
tried sneaking up on it and boy is it a surprise when you're
pupils slam shut from the lights.
Evelyn
|
296.185 | They're quite nice (usually) | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Wed Mar 16 1988 10:58 | 13 |
| I've been using one for a couple of years (I think I bought it
from Markline); they're very nice. Had a problem once when a
bug built a cocoon in the photosensor cavity, but aside from
that it's been completely reliable.
There are some side effects you should be aware of. The biggest
convenience of ours is having the driveway light come on when we
drive in, but as a security measure, it looks as though somebody
noticed you arriving and turned on the lights to greet/investigate
you. Now, if you're NOT a thief, but a delivery person or contractor
or some such, you can get rather peeved when you then ring the
doorbell ... and wait ... and ring ... and wait ... "*@#*!*$! but
they're home; they turned the lights on..."
|
296.186 | Beware of critters | MERLAN::GAGER | | Wed Mar 16 1988 11:49 | 10 |
| I've been using one for a year now and agree that they're good
for security and convenience...the only problem is that when all
the cats and dogs in the neighborhood find out that you have one,
they seem to like to come by and get their jollies by causing
it to turn on !!! :) Maybe it's just a matter of adjusting the
sensitivity, but I'm just not inclined to get up on a ladder
to adjust it, to keep occasional dogs from causing it to turn on.
,Jeff
|
296.187 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Wed Mar 16 1988 12:33 | 7 |
| is the 'time-to-turn-off' period adjustable? What min,max?
Someone mentioned you can hook it up so you can also turn them on via
a switch - how does that work?
/jeff (who's almost sold)
|
296.188 | Installs like any other light fixture | FDCV03::PARENT | | Wed Mar 16 1988 15:55 | 16 |
| Re .4
I'm not sure if the turn off period is adjustable. I'll ask when
I go home tonight.
Ours was installed in the place of an existing flood light controlled
by a wall switch. If you just turn on the switch the sensor is
activated and the light won't come on unless motion is detected.
To override you just recycle the switch off & on and the lights
stay on.
They must be popular, when we decided to pick up another one
Lechmere was out of stock and issuing rainchecks with an estimated
4 week leadtime.
Evelyn
|
296.189 | Any RCA buyers??? | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Wed Mar 16 1988 16:26 | 7 |
|
Has anybody tried the RCA brand? Spag's has these on sale this
week for around $28. I read the directions on it but it didn't
sound like a simple replacement operation. Any experience with
this type out there?
Phil
|
296.190 | Turn-off Period Not Adjustable | FDCV03::PARENT | | Thu Mar 17 1988 08:17 | 12 |
| Addition to .5
I checked and the turn-off period is not adjustable for the Heath/
Zenith unit. We haven't timed it yet but it seems to stay on for
a reasonably long time (5-10 minutes I'd guess).
Our's is installed on the back of the house primarily for security
reasons. I think the lights stay on long enough to discourage
someone from hanging around long enough to attempt to break in.
Evelyn
|
296.191 | Poor Man's Secuirty System... | MAGIC1::BEAUDET | Beware...the Junk_Yard_Dog! | Fri Mar 18 1988 12:55 | 10 |
| Seems like these items are poplular...
Since they seem to power standard sockets, I would assume that one
could place an ac plug adapter into one of the sockets to power a
siren or similar sound device...or even something inside the house
to turn on lights or wake occupants...
Has anyone tried such a setup using a master kill switch?
|
296.192 | RCA | HAZEL::THOMAS | | Fri Mar 18 1988 13:39 | 9 |
| RE:6
We've had an RCA motion switch for 2 years. Works great. The advantage
of this type is you can connect to your normal outdoor lamps instead
of using floodlamps. One minor nit, they sometimes stay on in subzero
temperatures.
- Rich
|
296.193 | Add a Ultrasonic beeper... | CLOSUS::HOE | from Colorado with love! | Sat Mar 19 1988 11:05 | 6 |
| RE .3
Keep the critters out with one of those rodent Ultrasonic beepers.
them little critters will be gone really quick.
/cal
|
296.194 | Excuse the digression | MERLAN::GAGER | | Mon Mar 21 1988 11:42 | 7 |
| RE .10
Who manufactures "Ultrasonic beepers" and where can I get one out
here in New Hampshire ? ...do they really work ?
,Jeff
|
296.195 | RCA's work for me. | SAACT3::SAKOVICH_A | Cogito ergo Zoom! | Tue Mar 22 1988 22:41 | 42 |
| RE: RCA
I've installed four of the RCA units: 3 outdoors and 1 indoor.
The outdoor units work with existing lighting (no big ET type sensor
head sticking out of your wall :^) - the electronics fit (Just barely!)
inside the lamp's electrical box, and a seperate wire leads to the
sensor (~10'). This allows you to put the sensor in a) an
inconspicuous place, b) a convenient place, or c) an effective place.
The units have an adjustable time delay (10 seconds to 15 minutes)
and are sensitive to the ambient light level (no lights coming on
at noon time!) The nit a few notes back about subzero temperatures
is true. That and if the sensor gets soaked in a good downpour.
The latter can be cured by making sure that the sensor doesn't get
soaked! (Doctor - it hurts when I do this! Dumpkopff - don't do
that!!! ;^)
The interior unit I have plugs into an existing wall outlet with
a male/female plug. Your existing lamp then plugs into the female
portion of the plug. The sensor/electronics assembly can then be
place within about 6' of the plug. Same features as the outdoor
unit. Except you don't have to worry quite so much about soaking
the sensor... Haven't quite figured out why that is, though; maybe
I lived in Seattle too long!!!
RCA also makes one other unit that replaces existing indoor light
switches. Haven't tried that one yet.
These units seem to have a range of about 20-30'. This mainly depends
upon ambient temperature (infrared, remember?), direction of travel
(across the field of view is better than towards the sensor), and
body temperature (my wife consistently turns it on about 5' before
I do! That's the only variable we can think of - we've even checked
clothing color to no consistent conclusions!)
By the way, we got ours at K-Mart, about $32 on sale.
We're happy with 'em!
Regards,
Aaron
|
296.196 | override/RCA? | DICKNS::FRIEDMAN | | Mon Apr 11 1988 16:12 | 4 |
| Does the RCA model have the override feature, allowing you to turn
the lights on manually? Thanks.
Marty
|
296.197 | Automagic automated manual override | SAACT0::SAKOVICH_A | Cogito ergo Zoom! | Mon Apr 11 1988 17:11 | 11 |
| Yup, on the outdoor RCA models, you can make the light come on
indefinitely by toggling the switch off then on within a 5 second
period. If you wait longer than 5 seconds, the light will
automagically turn itself off after the preset timeout period.
The indoor unit has a three position switch which performs the same
function.
Happy automating, (sounds perverted, doesn't it?)
Aaron :^)
|
296.51 | Wireless by Schlage ??? | FRSBEE::PETERS | | Mon May 09 1988 06:54 | 5 |
| Does anyone have any comments on the wireless system made by Schlage?
I would like to put in an alarm since we live in the boonies but
2k seems expensive.
Thanks
|
296.52 | Recommendation... | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | This Space For Rent | Wed May 11 1988 17:41 | 19 |
| Amway has one of the best wireless Perimeter Alarm systems on the market.
The distributor comes in to do a security survey to find out how
much your system would cost. It really offers a lot; programmable
zone protection, remote control, lighting control, etc. Also comes
with a 5 year Repair or Replacement Program.
They also offer a monitoring system for $150.00 a year. The monitoring
system helps prevent false alarms because the monitor will call
the house and if the homeowner is home they have to give their password
and the alarm won't be called into the police.
They also have a panic button for the elderly or disabled. They
keep this small transmitter with them so if they fall and hurt them
selves they can press this button which relays a signal to the monitor.
The monitor will then call the house and if there is no answer will
call an ambulance (which hopefull will take all of 10 min. to get
there).
Kathy
|
296.19 | securing phone wire entrance to home | CIMNET::LUNGER | Dave Lunger, 291-7797, MET-1/K2 | Fri Jul 15 1988 09:04 | 22 |
| RE: .15 and others, securing phone lines entering house
Currently, the phone wire comes in over the street, hooks to the
house on the outside 2 stories high, and then thru heavy wire
(I presume 2 conductor) goes thru a series of insulators down to
a small plastic box on the outside of the house about 1' above
ground level. In preparation for an alarm installation, I'd like
to make this more secure. What is the best alternative?
Should I leave it alone (an audible alarm will protect house in case
phone wire snipped)?
Should I run the wire thru a conduit, and move that box to the inside
using an LB to enter the house?
Will 1/2" galvanized harm phone signals? What about other types of
conduit... PVC? Aluminum?
Should I fish the wires into the attic, and then down to the basement from
there, thus removing it from the side of the house altogether?
Some other method?
|
296.20 | relatively simple job | REGENT::GETTYS | Bob Gettys N1BRM 223-6897 | Fri Jul 15 1988 09:11 | 11 |
| On my house that small plastic box is mounted about 10ft
above the ground and the phone wire goes into the attic (I have
no basement). The easiest thing to do (depending on your access
from the attic to the basement) is probably to move the box up
to the "top" of the wall and run the wire down a piece of
conduit and into the basement. That box MUST be accessable as it
is where the phone line lightining protector is (there will be a
wire going to ground) and it is where the phone company will
likely test your line if you call them to come out on a problem.
/s/ Bob
|
296.21 | | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Jul 15 1988 10:01 | 2 |
| Note that the phone company owns the phone wire up to and including that box.
Homeowners own the wire once it has left the box. Just for your information.
|
296.22 | Phone Company Is Possessive! | DSTR08::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Mon Jul 18 1988 09:50 | 28 |
| RE: .20, .21
Note .21 makes a very important point, as I found out recently. The phone
company does not permit the homeowner to move that box or their wire.
If you do you may have to pay for it.
I moved my box 2 feet to allow the addition of a fireplace and I used
one insulated staple to hold the wire away from the fireplace. About a
year later I called the phone company because there was lots of static
on the line. The repairman said "Gee, it looks like this box has been
moved by someone other than the phone company, since we never use
insulated staples." He told me that if the problem was due to the move
(it turned out it was not) that I would have to pay for the repair
because I had "tampered" with phone company property.
RE .19
Given the above and need to be able to access the box, I'd suggest
(a) snaking a wire from a point in the basement where you can access
the line running from the exterior box, up to the attic
(b) drilling a hole to the outside and pusing the wire through the hole
(c) having the phone company move the box and connect to the new wire.
(d) connect the new line in the basement
That way you have removed the wire from the side of the house without
risking problems with the phone company.
|
296.53 | Fees, Fees, and More Fees | ANT::PGIOVINAZZO | | Fri Aug 05 1988 10:32 | 6 |
| Does anyone know if I can purchase a monitored system from company
"X" and install it myself or use the already exisiting door, window,
and infared detectors. This is of course an attempt to save $1500.00
to $2000.00 on installation fees.
Paul
|
296.54 | Black & Decker | STAR::RUBINO | | Fri Aug 05 1988 11:26 | 10 |
| re .26;
I'm pretty sure that Black & Decker has a "do it yourself" system
with an optional monitoring system. I'm not sure if you could get
your existing system to cooperate with the black & Decker system.
Lechmere has the Black & Decker system on display.
Good luck,
mike
|
296.55 | Reposted note | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Oct 05 1988 14:37 | 27 |
| <<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 2686.1 INFO NEEDED ON HOME ALARM SYSTEMS 1 of 3
BINKLY::WINSTON "Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA)" 19 lines 5-OCT-1988 13:05
-< one persons $.02 (bark) >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having looked into to this for/with some relatives. I think that the
wired, door/window switch, tape on window systems are obselete. With
three or four motion-and-heat-sensing units, and a control panel and
panic button or two, you can cover most houses just fine. If you're
somewhat handy, you could install all this yourself. My sense is that
the big hassle is hooking up to your police dept., and that (sigh)
some towns require that systems be installed only by "licensed
professionals".,,,
Another idea: For years, we lived on a street where it seemed like
every house around us was burglarized once within a 10 year period,
even though they all had complete alarm systems. We never had a
break-in, because of our unique, though a bit expensive, alarm
system...
An Irish Setter, we called him "Lucky"
|
296.56 | Reposted note | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Oct 05 1988 14:39 | 106 |
| <<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 2686.2 INFO NEEDED ON HOME ALARM SYSTEMS 2 of 3
AKOV13::MATUS "Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA" 98 lines 5-OCT-1988 13:20
-< Long reply >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had an alarm system installed a couple of years back. Here is
what I have learned:
1. WIRED VS. WIRELESS.
Let me take wireless first. Each monitor is basically a radio
transmitter. When conditions are normal, the transmitter is silent.
When a trigger is tripped, then a signal is transmitted and a remote
device receives it. The problem is that there is no way to tell if the
system is functioning normally. For example, unless a device can
transmit a message to indicate that the battery is low or has no
power, you won't know that a component has failed and can't transmit.
Further, if there is interference or some reason why the receiver
doen't function properly, a problem won't be detected.
A wired system can be "normally off" or "normally on". The former
works like the wireless system. A normally on system sends current
through wires to every single device. If a device is not working
for any reason, an alarm is sounded. Further, except for more
expensive digital wireless systems, only a normally on system can
detect which particular device has been triggered. Granted, there
is some risk that you will get a false alarm because a diode blew
or the vacuum cleaner smashed a detector, but, I would rather know
immediately if any part of my security system is not functioning.
Incidentally, a wired system does not mean tape on the windows anymore.
You can wire motion and heat detecting units, as suggested in the
previous reply. Also, a few door switches are recommended on key
entry points in case you wish to shunt one of the detectors (discussed
below).
The big issue isn't wired -- it is "normally on" versus "normally
off".
2. DIY vs contractor
I guess that depends on how good you are with carpentry and wiring.
I went with a contractor.
3. Brand preference
If you use a monitoring company, I suggest that you find out what
brands they will support. That could influence your choice of system.
4. Features
I recommend that you have a system that allows you to shunt zones.
For example, you may decide to put an infrared detector in your
basement. It would be good to be able to activate your alarm system
while you are working in the basement. A shunt would enable you
to tell the system to disregard that particular zone.
I recommend a keypad system over a keyed system. It would also
be good to have a number of different codes available. For example,
you may want to give a babysitter her own code to activate or
deactivate the system. Today's alarms allow you to set codes that
are only valid at certain times. Others will even keep a record
of what code was used when. In that way, if there was a robbery
but your alarm was shut off, you can identify which person did it.
Finally, keys can be lost and then found by somebody else. I was
concerned that if I lost my key ring, a person would have both the
house key and alarm access. With a keypad, they do not.
My system also requires you to enter the code exactly. If you don't,
the system will ignore everything you type until there is a five
second pause. This prevents somebody from randomly punching numbers
in a continuous frenzy and accidentally then finding your code.
Finally, have a battery back-up that will last at least a day. You want
the system to remember your codes and to be active during power
failures. (Which do happen in the winter.) A rechargable battery is
suggested. (BTW, my alarm will be triggered if you attempt to remove
the battery without typing a special code or if the battery gets low.
This feature prevents somebody from disconnecting the battery if
they are in the house (such as a construction worker) and then later
come back and cut the power to the house.)
5. Central monitoring versus alarm
Hey, when was the last time you stopped for an auto alarm siren?
(OK, maybe you do, but can you say that for your neighbors?)
A central monitoring system means that somebody will be there to
answer the call of your system. They can call the police and other
people if you wish (perhaps a relative or your office). You know
that it has been handled. (BTW, have the phone interface put in
the line before any phones. One common trick for a robber is to
take the phone off the hook to prevent a system from dialing. Your
system should automatically control the entire phone line and hang
up all calls.)
I urge you to stay away from systems that broadcast a taped message.
They are often ignored and the police hate them.
Good luck on your selection.
Roger
|
296.57 | | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Oct 05 1988 15:11 | 15 |
| In Waltham MA, it is no longer possible to connect your burglar alarm
directly to the police department -- you must connect it to a private
security firm, who can call the police if they verify a genuine alarm.
So I'd suggest checking with your town police first to see what they like.
My parents also lived in a reasonably nice neighborhood in which they were
the only house on the block that wasn't burglarized. They had a very
active dog.
I've been thinking of putting in some motion detection lights and leaving
it at that. Not only might they scare away burglars who'd rather work in
the dark, they'll turn on automatically when I come home after dark!
Luck,
Larry
|
296.58 | supervised wireless | GRANMA::GHALSTEAD | | Wed Oct 05 1988 21:04 | 15 |
| In regards to note 29, Wireless vs. Wired
There are some pretty sophisticated wireless systems now that are
called supervised wireless. The system checks each transmitter
periodically to insure it is functioning correctly. It will tellyou
when a low battery exists in one of your transmitters.
A feature that is not possible with a wired system is the ability
to have a handheld transmitter that you could turn on lights in the
house from your car or hit a panic button or medical alert that
would signal help.
I have recently seen units that offer a combination of wired and
wireless, the best of both worlds.
|
296.59 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Oct 06 1988 17:39 | 31 |
| I used to work part time installing alarm systems. The last two
replies are pretty good. I agree with theire comments and add the
following:
1) I've seen several different brands of motion detectors and I've
been able to walk right by all of them just by going very slow --
Yes I mean V_E_R_Y S_L__O___W... Of course I had to know in
advance where they were located. On the other hand I helped to
investigat a burlary in which access was gained by cutting a hole
in the door. The door wasn't opened; the alarm wasn't activiated.
So I'd suggest a mix of (a) perimeter protection (i.e. tape on
glass, magnetic or mechanical contacts on windows and doors), plus
(b) motion detectors, plus (c) presure sensitive mats in key
locations like halls and near doorways.
2) In choosing whether to install a local alarm bell/siren and or
to have a centrally monitored system consider: The local alarm is
more likely to scare a burgler away. A silent, monitored alarm is
an attempt to catch the burglar. Many smart burglars will get in
and out too quickly for police to get there in any case. Many
"casual" burglars can be scared away by the alarm before they do
yet more damage to your property. Obviously a local alarm plus
central monitoring is best, but if you can't have both I'd suggest
that the local alaram is the first choice.
3) Don't loose slight of reality. If a thief really, really wants
what you have there is NOTHING, up to and including armed troops
that will keep him out. (He'll just hire a bigger army!) All you
can hope to do is to make your house harder to rob than your
neighbor's so that the thief will leave you alone and hit your
neighbor. (Now don't tell your neighbors I said that!)
|
296.199 | DAK's entry - any good? | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Nov 11 1988 16:28 | 11 |
| DAK now has one of these in their catalog for $29.95
'heat sensing' (not motion sensing) (is this IR operation?)
inhibits operation during daylight
variable turnoff from 10sec - 15 min
good unit, good price? or old technology?
thanx/j
|
296.200 | $25 at Spags, but no turnoff adjustment | SEILER::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Nov 11 1988 17:25 | 13 |
| SPAGs has a motion detector light for $25. Plastic housing, two lamps, up
to 600W, disables during daylight, 4 minute turnoff. You can wire it up
with a switch to force it off or a switch to force it on or both -- and I
think I've worked out how to wire a 3 way switch to it such that down puts
it in autoamtic mode, up forces it on, and leaving the switch in the
middle forces it off.
I bought one, but I haven't tried it out yet. One of the reasons it is
so low cost (aside from the plastic construction) is that you have to
wire together the sensor and the lights yourself, rather than their
being wired together already inside the unit. But wire nuts are cheap.
Larry
|
296.201 | IR sensor wiring questions | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Nov 15 1988 12:46 | 20 |
| Well, the DAK one is heat-sensing in nature. I think i'm going to
give it a try. but first, a few general questions:
1) can't you wire an ON override to ANY of these sensors? I
would think the wiring looks like:
.----sensor---.
white---------+ +-----lamp-------black
`------/~~~~~~'
switch
OR it is bad to short across the IR sensor???? ? ? ? ?
btw - if you have a SPDT CENTER OFF switch, couldn't you get ON/OFF/SENSOR
wih the switch as follows:
o----sensor---.
white---------o +-----lamp-------black
o-------------'
Again, is it bad to short across the IR sensor???? ? ? ? ?
|
296.202 | Wiring up the SPAGS unit | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Nov 15 1988 14:14 | 30 |
| I don't know how the IR sensors work, so I can't say for sure whether
it is bad to short across them in general. But it should work for the
SPAGS unit. They give a two switch wiring diagram as follows:
black +----------+ +----------+ white
+---------------| switch 1 |------------| Sensor |--------+
| +----------+ +-----+----+ |
| (red) | |
| | |
| black +----------+ | +---+---+
+---------------| switch 2 |------------------+---------| Lamps |
+----------+ +-------+
Switch 2 forces the light on and (if switch 2 is off) switch 1
puts it into automatic mode. This setup makes it possible to tie
power to either or both sides of the sensor. There's nothing in
the instructions warning not to use one of the switch combinations,
so it had better not mess up the sensor! Probably the red output
from the sensor just connects to a relay, and doesn't affect the
sensor itself at all. But I haven't looked inside to see.
So I plan to replace switches 1 and 2 with a 3 way switch, which is
what .-1 proposes. I don't even plan to get a 3 position switch --
my use for leaving it forced off would be so minor that I'm willing
to have to balance the switch in the middle to get that.
Larry
PS - It is probably also heat sensing, because it also turns off
in the daytime.
|
296.203 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Nov 15 1988 14:47 | 5 |
| >PS - It is probably also heat sensing, because it also turns off
>in the daytime.
Well, I won't dispute that the sun generates heat. However, most of
them have a photocell that inhibits operation during daylight.
|
296.204 | | HPSTEK::DVORAK | George Dvorak | Tue Nov 15 1988 16:45 | 9 |
|
I have one of the Spags units, and I took it apart ( I know, curiosity
killed..). There is a relay inside, and if I recall correctly, it has
a 12V coil and is rated at 5 amps. I found that the unit turns on when
it is windy outside. It seems to sense the tree branches moving. I
made a sheet metal hood for it to restrict the view, which has reduced
this problem. Anyone else have their light turn on when it is windy?
gjd
|
296.205 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 16 1988 11:05 | 8 |
| I don't think its the tree movement as much as a cool breeze over
a warm surface. I have this problem, but only when I parked my car
in the driveway some time in the evening. I think that the wind
slightly cools my hood, so when the wind stops, and the hood warms
up again, the infrared sensor detects the heat and turns the light
on again.
Eric
|
296.198 | | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Thu Nov 17 1988 11:15 | 6 |
|
-2 When we first got our light it would be activated by the wind
fairly easy. We kept adjusting the sensitivity until we
found the right balance for us. We have lots of coniferous trees
around the driveway and not far from the light. Now the light
only goes on when it is "wicked" windy -- a few times a year.
|
296.60 | ex | ICS::NETWORK | Formerly MILVAX::SOTTILE | Thu Jan 19 1989 15:31 | 6 |
|
any recomendations on brands
radio shack vs black&decker, vs whetever.
and where to buy.
steve
|
296.61 | Also try note 1181 | WFOOFF::KULIG | So many NOTES, So little time | Fri Jan 20 1989 13:51 | 14 |
| Reply to .33
I recently installed a single zone Radio Shack system in my home.
It cost 200.00 and included an auto-dialer. This system was
easy to install, and works fine.
I believe their 4 zone system is on sale now. I don't remember
what they are throwing in for free, but the price was 200.00.
Mike.
|
296.141 | ADT Security Systems | FRSBEE::PETERS | | Mon Feb 06 1989 11:16 | 5 |
|
Does anyone have any information, opinions, etc on ADT Security
Systems ? I got a call from them and a brouchure. The system looks
good, but, before I go through the salesperson route, I would like
soome info ?
|
296.142 | See also notes 1181 and 1314 | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Feb 06 1989 13:24 | 0 |
296.143 | Consumer Notes File | TURKEY::SCHLENER | | Tue Feb 07 1989 13:54 | 6 |
| Check out the Consumer Notes file (I don't remember where it is and
right now my primary node is down). For some reason, I think that
someone wrote about ADT. If I find the note, I'll let you know.
By the way, I think it was written in the last few months.
Cindy
|
296.62 | Advice on price/value? | STOREM::MARGOLIS | | Thu Apr 06 1989 17:19 | 26 |
| We are now having a house built. The contractor includes an
alarm in the house, based on wiring doors and using one motion
detector to protect against window entry. We would like to add
window coverage to the system. However, as you can see in the list
below, pricing has become an issue.
Can I get some advice from those of you who have been through
this - is this the going rate for coverage? Are we trying to
buy a Cadillac?
1 basement door \_____ $1800 (this is our base)
7 first floor doors /
2 motion detectors /
3 control panels /
5 basement windows \
1 basement door \
7 1st flr doors \_____ $2950
9 1st flr regular windows /
7 1st flr casements (wood) /
1 motion detector /
3 control panels /
|
296.63 | No window switches | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Thu Apr 06 1989 17:26 | 15 |
| If you have inside motion detectors, window switches are a waste
of money (break window, crawl in through opening, window remains
shut = no alarm). One motion detector will not provide adequate
coverage. Depending on the layout of the first floor, you will
require at least two to cover as much area as possible, including:
the entry from front and rear, and the entry from the cellar door
onto the first floor. For the basement, the best option is a
noise (glass breakage) detector.
If you want to spend money, consider adding fire protection to
the burglar alarm. Now's the time to do it, and you may get a
discount on your homeowner insurance.
pbm
|
296.64 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu Apr 06 1989 18:17 | 9 |
| Seven first floor doors? That's not just a Cadillac, that's a stretch
limo, at least.
Motion detectors are certainly more cost effective than individual
sensors, but they may be troublesome if you ever get pets. Another
option to consider is to put weight detectors under carpeting,
especially on steps.
Gary
|
296.65 | KEEP IN MIND HEAT FROM THE SUN | TOLKIN::GUERRA | SAL GUERRA DTN 225-5810 | Fri Apr 07 1989 10:47 | 8 |
| Remember also that most motion detectors, if not all, operate with
infrared light. In other words, they sense heat changes. If they
are installed facing in the general direction of a glass window
or door, the heat of the sun will set them off. A sheer curtain
won't help block that heat and I am not so sure heavier drapes will,
either. I talk from expereince. We have those at our house and,
even when we didn't have a cat roaming around, we couldn't use them
because they are facing a glass slider and an angle window.
|
296.66 | Motion detectors are marginally useful | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Fri Apr 07 1989 13:29 | 17 |
| There are two kinds of motion detectors. .-1 describes the infrared
kind. There are also ultrasonic ones that work with sound waves (not
sure how). Loud noises can kick them off (like thunderstorms). But the
point is well taken - various kinds of non-burglar phenomena have a
habit of tripping motion detectors.
If you want to hook the system to the police or a security service,
excessive false alarms will probably cause them to stop servicing
you so it's a real concern.
Until newer technology becomes more reliable, nothing seems to top
the closed-loop perimeter system with sensors at every possible
point of entry (including glass-break detectors). But wiring these
into an existing house can be nigh-on impossible.
( The wireless kind that transmit via the house wiring are also subject
to false alarms due to spikes, static, etc. )
|
296.67 | Sounds a little high | LEVERS::S_JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Apr 07 1989 14:31 | 49 |
| We paid $1800 for 3 motion detectors, 4 door switches, 10 window
switches, a loud horn and 2 control panels; installed. The auto-phone
unit belongs to the security company and is included in the monthly
monitoring and maintenance fee ($20). As I remember, the motion
detectors were about $200 each, and the switches were only about
$30 each (installed). If we are going to turn the system on while
someone is in the house, we disable the motion detectors. For this
reason I would suggest putting switches on all windows and doors
reachable from the ground level. You definitely want to scare away
anybody who tries to get in while you are sleeping! As previously
mentioned, the motion detectors help to get the people who break
windows to get in while you're not home.
This was installed after the house was built. They had no problem
wiring it up. They used these loooooooooonng drill bits to drill
through the window casings into the basement.
The 1800 bucks has definitely been worth the money in terms
of making my wife feel safe when home alone.
***** WARNING - amusing anecdote follows
We had a friend of ours (female) staying at our house, and we
left for vacation a couple of days before she had to leave. She
knew how to turn on and off the alarm, but we had neglected to tell
her that we always used the "partial" mode (motions off) at night.
She set the alarm and went to bed. She was awakened later by a
sound, and became convinced that someone was in the basement. She
went down into the basement to check it out (that took balls, er,
guts), and walked in front of the motion detector which set the
alarm off. This firmly convinced her that someone else WAS in the
house, so she went upstairs to call the police. As she was dialing,
the phone went dead (automatic call to the security company). Now
she's convinced that someone has cut the phone lines!!
Set /Guest=drooling_hysterical_basket_case
I guess the security company called the police, because a little while
later the rent-a-cop drives up the driveway (we live way off the road).
She sees him and runs out of the house, but he goes back down the
driveway to wait for a backup. Now she's standing all alone in the
middle of the driveway in her nightgown convinced that the crook is
gonna get her at any moment! The cops finally did come back (didn't
find anything), but she didn't sleep much after that.
Steve
|
296.68 | The alarm & a deranged cat! | DNEAST::RIPLEY_GORDO | | Fri Apr 07 1989 16:12 | 20 |
|
We don't have motion detectors but a neighbor we had
in Marlboro did. He went on vacation, daughter came to the house
and inadvertently let in the CAT! My wife and I came home from
a trip and went to bed. At 12 midnight or so there was an awfull
alarm noise that started up right outside our window - The cat had
set off the alarm. The scene was that the cat set off the alarm
and ran under the bed (shivering I'm sure). After awhile the alarm
turned itself off (my wife and I were not home the first time this
happened, this was all before we got homefrom our trip). Then a
few hours later, the cat, thinking all was ok came out from under
the bed again! Well, I guess this had been going on for a long
time before we got home and so at midnight when it went off we
called the police and they told us that it had already been called
in. I'm sure that the cat had to have therapy when it was all over.
The sound of that alarm still rings in my head and it was scary!
Gordon Ripley...
|
296.69 | Some more info- Dual detectors. | MAKITA::MCCABE | | Mon Apr 10 1989 13:29 | 22 |
| Several manufacturers make dual motion detectors, that is, they
consist of infared and ultrasonic sensors. If one unit has a "hit"
it check with the other to make sure the other also has a "hit".
I installed these in my house, I think they are an Aritech 241 unit.
Also most good panels Napco Moose, Ademco can shunt out zones
from the keypad, no need to have individual switches on windows
if you are going to leave them open. Check the number of zones you
get with your system, the more the better. If you have a "swinger",
a zone that trips in and out, it is much easier to troubleshoot
if every window in the house is not on one zone. Also most good
panels have an autoshunt mode. If you want to run out of the house
and leave a few windows open, it tells you the zones that are open,
and arms the panel taking those zones out of the loop. You only
program certain zones to do this. Several panels use a burgular
zone for a fire loop, so if you want to add smoke detectors later,
you will need that zone free. I would put the smoke detectors in
now, or at least run the wires for them. If you need more info,
send me some mail, I know of a couple of excellent installers/companies
in the Boston area, who do good work and also provide central
station coverage.
Chris
|
296.70 | How Ultrasonics Work | SALEM::MCWILLIAMS | | Fri Apr 14 1989 12:09 | 10 |
| Most of the Ultrasonic motion sensor use a pair of 40 KHz piezoelectric
elements, one transmitter and one receiver. They then look for doppler
shifted frequencies on either side of the fundemental indicating that
something reflecting sound has moved.
Usually they have limits on the frequency spectrum they monitor so they
only will detect up to certain speeds of motion, and there are
thresholds for the amount of shifted spectrum they will detect.
/jim
|
296.215 | Schalage Keepsafer ? | FRSBEE::PETERS | | Mon May 08 1989 07:26 | 4 |
| Does anyone have any experience with the Schlage Keepsafer or Black
& Decker alarm systems ? I am particularly interested in their passive
infrared motion detectors. Do they go off with the sun through a
window or with static electricity ?
|
296.216 | 562, 1181, 1314, 2116, 2401, 2984 | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon May 08 1989 09:35 | 18 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since nearly
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the same
exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own new
note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you
may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Paul [Moderator]
|
296.71 | ?Alarm monitor co. recommendations? | STOREM::MARGOLIS | | Wed May 10 1989 14:50 | 10 |
| We have quotes from two alarm installers/monitoring companies
in the Metro West area. (Warren Security in Marlboro and ADT).
Do any of you have experience with either of these companies?
Their quotes are virtually the same, and the equipment seems
to be also.
We will be checking with the local fire and police stations
for general reputation of the two companies.
Thanks
|
296.72 | They have been good for us so far. | REINER::SULLIVAN | There's a time and a place for spontaneity | Wed May 10 1989 21:59 | 10 |
| We have a system which is now 1 year old. It has performed perfectly and as
advertised. One problem we had was promptly fixed (too sensitive infrared
detector). They always showed up on time and did very neat work.
Security Design Consultants (SDC)
Weston, Ma. (sorry I don't have the number with me)
I also got bids from ADT, Honeywell, etc. SDC was competative.
Mark
|
296.73 | <security systems> | PASTA::SWEENEY | | Thu May 11 1989 08:49 | 18 |
| I got quotes from both WARREN and ADT and a few others. WARREN and
ADT's quotes were extremely high compared to all the other quotes
I got. I'ld look around a bit more. ADT sent out a sales person
dressed in a 3 piece suit to my house.
I ended up going w/ Control Concepts from Ashland or Framingham.
They were reasonable. There was another company in Uxbridge area
called Eagle security that I was impressed w/ and now wish I had
gone w/. The owner comes to your house to present the units he deals
w/. He also installs the units himselef w/ 1 or 2 other workers.
1 day to 1 1/2 day installation. He worked as an installer for ADT
and subbed for many of the other companies in the Worcester area.
He knew everyones system inside and out.
If you would like more info feel free to send me mail or call
DTN 225-6808
/Jay
|
296.74 | Two Alarm company recommendations | MAKITA::MCCABE | | Thu May 11 1989 13:41 | 18 |
| Two companies I highly recommend are Patriot alarm in Canton Ma.
and Rapco security in No. Easton Ma. Both companies do residential
work. Patriot leans more toward the commercial side of the business,
they own their own central station and provide security for many
large businesses and chains on the east coast.
Rapco deals primarily with residential installations, uses all
the latest equipment and provides central station monitoring.
Both companies have been in business for many years and stand
behind their work.
Patriot Alarm........821-2325
Rapco Security.......238-7536
Chris
|
296.144 | Wireless Security Systems (any good?) | DEMING::SPIEWAK | | Wed Nov 29 1989 17:08 | 10 |
| I didn't find any previous note on this topic so I'll bring it up here.
Does anyone have experiences/recommendations on Wireless security
systems? After 2 break-ins it's time for something. I do not want to
invest in a wired in system because of cost and the fact that I expect
to move within the next year.
I've seen the Black and Decker, Safe & Sound, Radio Shack and Keepsafer
kits that vary in cost from $79 to $450 depending on extent of system.
|
296.145 | See Electro_Hobby | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 29 1989 21:00 | 4 |
| This topic has been discussed in CSOA1::Electro_hobby, note 221 (KP7
and all that jazz).
Eric
|
296.146 | It's off to electro_hobby I go... | JURAN::SPIEWAK | | Thu Nov 30 1989 14:42 | 2 |
| Thanks for the pointer, I'll check it out.
|
296.148 | advice on home alarm systems needed | CURIE::PITOCHELLI | | Tue Dec 19 1989 16:53 | 19 |
| I need advice on the kind of burglar alarm to install...
I've had two estimates
one recommended a wireless system of switches for doors and basement
windows and infrared sensors
the other recommended a hard wire sensors in basement and first floor
switches at front and back doors...
My questions:
which is most reliable....wired or wireless
I have a cat and may get a small dog...will they set off false alarms??
any advice as to type...hard wired or not, brands etc much appreciated
Diane Pitochelli
MRO4
CURIE::Pitochelli
ps I'm a new user of NOTES
|
296.149 | 1111.87 - 1181, 1314, 2116, 2401, 2984 | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Don't become a statistic | Tue Dec 19 1989 17:01 | 20 |
|
This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under
the topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that
your question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question
would be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since
nearly everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the
same exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own
new note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and
you may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Bruce [Moderator]
|
296.147 | A word of advice | MAKITA::MCCABE | | Wed Dec 27 1989 14:25 | 6 |
| Take it from someone who used to install alarms, unfortunately,
you get what you pay for. Some of the new wireless professional
systems are good for situations where you can not hard wire a
contact, but you can not beat a hard wired system for reliability.
Chris
|
296.75 | Info Wanted on AT&T System | SAFETY::SEGAL | Len Segal, MLO6-1/U30, 223-7687 | Tue Feb 27 1990 20:44 | 65 |
| AT&T Series 8000 alarm systems were shown at the Home Show in Boston
recently. It appears to address most of the concerns noted in the
various notes on security, fire alarm, etc. systems.
Do any of you have any knowledge or experience with AT&T's Series
8000 systems? I had never heard of it before. I finally found out
a little more info than is in the sales brochure. It's been on the
market for ~2 years. Distributor in MA is Choice Security
Distributors (800-345-8826) who can tell you the names of local
dealers (Waltham, US Protective Alarms, 617-893-6636; No. Reading,
Shield Security Systems, 800-698-5554). Any knowledge/info about
the above dealers will be greatly appreciated, either posted here or
via MAIL.
Basically it is a wireless system with the following features:
8 channel interface (fire, med'l, environmental, interior, panic,
hostage, trouble, ?-didn't catch the last one).
Central Station Monitoring (~$18-27/month, with different agency
choices here as well, Century was mentioned as well as one on
Cape Cod who has a "World Net" of AT&T systems...not sure of
significance).
Battery Backup.
Operates at 40MHz.
"Fully Supervised" system-reads signals, checking equipment
functionality, reporting trouble, checking battery levels.
Universal Transmitters - each with a panic button and run on 9V
battery.
Wireless Remote Transmitters-with keypad.
Keypad Transmitter-normally mounted near primary access door.
Wireless Siren/Controller-internal alarm and can drive 2
additional external sirens/lights.
Distress Signal Feature-(hostage) appears to shutdown system, but
sends silent alarm to central monitoring station.
Passive IR Transmitters-with window beneath it to prevent
sneaking by it, three sets of lenses, ability to restrict field
of view.
External Siren.
Integrated Smoke Detector Transmitter-"...designed not to go off
indiscriminately from simple smoke or dust conditions."
"...designed to respond to real smoke and fire situations and
minimize false alarms."
Each wireless transmitter has a tamper-proof feature that alarms
if anyone opens it up.
Phone Dialer uses RJ31X jack which "captures" the line...does NOT
require a dedicated phone line.
Lights and sirens can be hooked up to alarm via interface to X-10
system.
Battery Backup is in series with normal wired power (on the DC
side of the converter) so power failures shouldn't trip system,
has chokes in the power supply to protect against
surges/spikes.
Has a time-delay on entry (40 sec) and exit (1 min).
Does Not have "housekeeper" code allowing limited access.
At the Home Show I was told that it would run ~$1K for an installed
system. Since it doesn't require a dedicated phone line, that's a
savings of $240+/year. It sounds really good, but I have never
really researched any alarm systems in the past. One of the
features I was looking for is wireless due to the fact I want to
move within a few years and would like to be able to take the
majority of the system with me for the next house (an alarm system
may be a plus on selling a house, but buyers won't pay you an extra
$1-2K for the house because of an alarm).
Any knowledge or opinions will be appreciated.
|
296.76 | MOOSE 1100e alarm, question | DEC103::KLIMASEWSKI | | Thu Mar 29 1990 09:46 | 9 |
| I have some questions on the MOOSE model 1100e alarm system. Anyone
have any experience I could talk to them about?
thanks,
Ken
dtn:297-2663
508-467-2663
|
296.77 | Black & Decker wireless system | ACUTE::MCKINLEY | | Mon Jun 18 1990 12:14 | 35 |
| Has anyone had any experience with the Black & Decker wireless alarm
system? This is a system which does NOT use radio transmitters on its
remote sensors, but uses small audible beepers which are "heard" by a
central monitoring unit or a relay unit. The system also communicates
over the house wiring (X-10?) to things like lamp control modules and
exterior sirens.
The system lists for $300 for one central monitor, one relay unit, one
lamp control, and six entry sensors. The central monitor will sound an
85 db alarm, monitor the system, has a panic alarm mode, and an instant
or delayed alarm mode. A five number combination turns the system off.
Additional components such as exterior siren (120db), motion detector,
autodialer, and a glass breakage detector are available. Even if the
central monitor is destroyed, the other units will function
independently after initially being notified of an intrusion.
The system is currently on sale at Lechmere for $250, with an
additional $50 rebate from the mfr. You can apply the rebate plus $30
to get the $100 exterior siren for $80.
Now that the description is out of the way, here are the questions.
I'm looking to use this system to discourage the average break-in from
kids or someone looking for quick-fix drug money. I live in a densely
packed neighborhood where an exterior siren would attract attention.
Has anyone has used this system and had any problem with false alarms
or non-alarms? If I don't use this system, I would probably go with a
wired Radio Shack system, but I don't want the pain of drilling lots of
holes and running wires through the walls (how hard is this?).
Any comments about this system would be appreciated. Remember, I'm not
trying to stop a professional thief (who probably wouldn't bother with
my place anyway).
---Phil
|
296.78 | I buy when it costs the most :^( | SNELL::BARTLETT | | Tue Jun 19 1990 11:44 | 44 |
| Re. 50 (Phil)
We bought the Black and Decker wireless system about a year and
a half ago. We live in a fairly rural area in Kingston, NH and
got the system more for "peace of mind" rather than as a response
to a particular problem. I looked at three systems (ADT, Shlage,
and B&D), and went with the B&D as the ADT was much more expensive
(can't have DIY installation) and the Shlage seemed to be a little
"cheap".
We had the misfortune of buying the system when it considerably
more expensive than it is now. We paid something like $500 for
it then, and I found it on sale for $400 at Sears within 6 months
of buying it, and I even recently saw it on sale at Service Merchandise
for $200! (I guess it was the same deal that you mentioned)
It was a breeze to install, and we've had very few problems with
it. Only had one false alarm, and that was due to my improper
installation of one of the sensors. It's very easy to use, and
the alarm is definitely audible. We also have the 120 db siren
which I still haven't put up yet, so I can imagine the noise when
that thing goes off! We also had one problem recently which B&D
fixed easily on the phone-the signal relay was apparently affected
by a power surge, so we had to reset the system.
Drawbacks: the entry sensors are not that attractive, and the entire
system doesn't really fit in with the aesthetics of the house (if
there is any in a house where we haven't gotten around to putting
up curtains in all of the windows :^)). The glass sensors also
aren't worth much at all. They don't respond to sharp taps on the
glass-haven't tried to see if they sense a broken pane yet!
Summary: The system does what it claims to, and it fits our needs
for peace-of-mind. Would I buy another one? For $500, probably
not. For $200, definitely.
I totally agree with something that someone else wrote earlier:
If someone wants to get into your house, he will. The main thing
that a home security system does is make it a little less easy.
Feel free to contact me if you have any specific questions that
I haven't answered.
Greg B.
|
296.79 | Sensors... | ACUTE::MCKINLEY | | Tue Jun 19 1990 15:17 | 16 |
| RE: .51 (Greg)
Thanks for the reply. It sounds like you have had good luck with this
system. Too bad it was more expensive when you bought it, but you got
an extra year and a half of protection/peace of mind from it.
I agree that the entry sensors can be unattractive. Fortunately, they
are almost the same color as my walls (off white). The system also
includes a remote sensor which can be hooked to the entry sensor unit.
this allows you to set the transmitter back from the door, a little
more out of the way. The remote sensor (a reed switch) and the magnet
can be taken out of their housings and fit between the door and the
frame if you have a little bit of space. You can also use the remote
sensor to keep the transmitter from being muffled behind curtains.
---Phil
|
296.23 | Low temperature alarm type device | WFOV12::KULIG | | Thu Aug 30 1990 14:36 | 16 |
| I couldn't find a topic called temperature alarms so i guess this
note will have to do.
I have a mobile home in vermont, and i am looking for a device that
would sense a preset temperature, 45 degrees or so, and activate
a telephone auto dialer that would play a message that the temperature
was getting low. I checked with radio shack and they used to have
one, but it didn't sell well and was discontinued. I have seen
devices that sense low temperatures and flash lights on and off,
but they won't do much good when you are 70 miles away. Anyone
help in locating will be appreciated.
thanks,
mike
|
296.24 | possible hack... | SMURF::DIBBLE | RECYCLE - do it now, or pay later! | Thu Aug 30 1990 14:40 | 7 |
|
This is just an idea, and possibly not well thought out.
Why not get a 'normal' thermostat and use the low temp setting to turn on
a relay. The relay to be allowing 110 volts to some kind of dialer.
Something of a hack, but ought to work.
|
296.25 | I own one of what you need... | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Fri Aug 31 1990 10:47 | 7 |
|
I have something like what you want, this weekend I'll enter the name
& address of the company for you (if they're still in business). It's
not a "Rat Shack" brand, I bought it 2nd hand, but it does exactly what
you want (no, I won't sell you mine... :^) :^) ).
Fred
|
296.26 | Heathkit to the rescue... :^) | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:46 | 4 |
| Heathkit sells this (Re: .23 -- temperature alarm/dialer).
800-44HEATH for catalog...
Fred
|
296.154 | Monthly cost for monitoring security system
| CROW::FERRARA | | Thu Dec 27 1990 08:12 | 16 |
| Hello,
My wife and I just purchased an older home with a ADT Fire/Security
system installed.
I talked to an ADT salesman about getting the system "on-line".
He told me it would cost $125 to hook up the system and $264 per month
for the monitoring service!!
That seems like a lot of money per month for this service. Can anyone
tell me what they are paying? Perhaps I didn't hear it correctly.
Thanks,
Bob
|
296.155 | Too much | USRCV1::RHODESJ | | Thu Dec 27 1990 09:00 | 8 |
| Sounds like that's the yearly charge.
Our system is $20/month from Westec.
Side note: When I evaluated 4 vendors for the security system, the
prices ranged from $18 to $24 per month. ADT was one of them but
don't recall which one it was. but I think they were the highest.
|
296.156 | What ? | CSSE::FRANGIADAKIS | | Thu Dec 27 1990 17:05 | 6 |
| We have a Honeywell system for $26.oo/month
Make sure you get a good reliable system and not a pain in the ...
John
|
296.157 | That was $264 for the YEAR! | CROW::FERRARA | | Fri Dec 28 1990 08:10 | 16 |
| Since reading the replies to my initial question, I called back the
saleman from ADT Security and clarified that the price of $264 was indeed
the YEARLY cost not the monthly cost ($264 per year works out to be $22
per month).
That does sound more reasonable.
Since I had NO idea what this type of service costs, I believed what
I heard.
But, thanks to this NOTES file I was able to get some good, accurate
information.
THANKS for all the replies,
Bob
|
296.206 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Fri May 31 1991 22:39 | 7 |
| I replaced the GFCI and everything is now working fine. I found the
exact unit on sale at Builder's Square under $7.50. I opened the old
one to find out what was wrong. The contact point for the neutral was
sligtly pitted.
Thanks,
- Vikas
|
296.207 | How to kill an outlet? | DEMON::CYCLPS::CHALMERS | Ski or die... | Mon Jun 03 1991 14:27 | 24 |
| Without going nuts digging thru all the electrical-outlet notes, this
seems to be as good a place as any to post this question...
I need some advice on how to *kill* an electrical outlet...actually, we
now want to tile a section of one wall where the wood stove will be.
However, this section of wall contains two electrical outlets. We've
decided to tile over these outlets rather than around them since (a) we
think they'll look funny poking out of the tile, and (b) there are
other outlets within a reasonable distance from this section of wall.
Therefore, I want to 'deactivate' these two outlets, and need some
advice/suggestions/opinions on how to proceed. Should I:
(1) simply tuck the outlets into the boxes and cover them with
the tile?
(2) remove the outlets, do something with the wiring (cap them
with wire nuts? in pairs? each by itself?), and then cover with
tile?
(3) Any other ideas?
As always, thanks in advance...
Freddie
|
296.208 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jun 03 1991 15:12 | 5 |
| re: .20
Sorry, according to the NEC what you are proposing is illegal. All
junction boxes must be permanently accessible, i.e. you can't bury
a box in a wall with no way to get at it.
|
296.209 | | SOLVIT::DCOX | | Mon Jun 03 1991 16:41 | 21 |
| Kill power to the line, then...
If they are the last outlets in the line,
remove the outlets and pull the wiring back "up the line" to the
last "hot" outlet. Remove the wire and terminate the run there.
If they are in the middle of a run,
remove the outlets and pull the wiring back "up the line" to the
last "hot outlet" and "down the line" to the next outlet. Remove
those runs and replace with a single run.
Do not leave a live box in the wall. Pity the poor soul 20 years from
now who cuts into that sheetrock thinking it is OK only to have the saw
blade cut through a live wire going to a hidden box. You will not have
made a friend.
Dave
|
296.210 | More alternatives | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Jun 03 1991 16:47 | 9 |
| You can buy porcelain outlet plates, that might look fine on tile.
If you're interested, I'll look out one of the various catalogs I've
seen them advertised in.
Or, you might consider if you want an outlet (or at least a cover plate)
on the *other* side of that wall...
Enjoy,
Larry
|
296.211 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 04 1991 08:35 | 9 |
| re: .22
Good thoughts, and I doubt that one has to physically remove the wire.
That would be nice, so the next person who tears the wall apart isn't
confused by wiring that isn't connected to anything, but I suspect all
one really needs to do is find the source for those outlets and
disconnect there.
The blank porcelin cover plate sounds even easier; doesn't Renovator's
Supply carry those?
|
296.212 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jun 04 1991 10:19 | 9 |
| re .22:
> Do not leave a live box in the wall. Pity the poor soul 20 years from
> now who cuts into that sheetrock thinking it is OK only to have the saw
> blade cut through a live wire going to a hidden box. You will not have
> made a friend.
What difference does it make if there's a box or not? If he blithely cuts
into the wall, he's going to hit the wire anyway.
|
296.213 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jun 05 1991 16:40 | 18 |
| >> Do not leave a live box in the wall. Pity the poor soul 20 years from
>> now who cuts into that sheetrock thinking it is OK only to have the saw
>> blade cut through a live wire going to a hidden box. You will not have
>> made a friend.
>
>What difference does it make if there's a box or not? If he blithely cuts
>into the wall, he's going to hit the wire anyway.
It might be a bit easier to cut into a junction box than into a
NMB cable, but I don't think thats the real problem that the code
is addressing.
The real world fact is that even the best made connections in a
junction box are a lot more likely to go bad than a random spot in
the middle of a cable run. If the box is hidden it can re really
difficult to find it. It is also likely that it will take
dangerously longer to realize that there is a fire if its hidden
behind the sheetrock.
|
296.214 | to bury is to cause trouble | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | just another 'port' in the storm | Thu Jun 06 1991 10:51 | 14 |
| The reason I was told that all eletrical boxes need to be accessable is that
every once and a while even the best of us will make a bad connection (most
likly due to an inferior wire nut or device) but if for some reason that
connection started to develop an arc or came off totally, there would be no way
to find the problem. In the case of an arc developing, there is a fire hazard.
Don't hide them. Kill the line that connects them to the power and make sure
that line can not be hooked up again (cut/pull, do SOMETHING to make sure of
this).
I don't thik having wires that go no-where is against the code, it just
confuses the person that rips the wall out 15 years down the road.
bjm
|
296.80 | DSC products? (Made in Canada) | RANGER::DAVE | | Mon Jul 22 1991 10:56 | 8 |
| I recently spoke with an installer (Chris Yacino from Eaglestar
Security out of Douglas, MA) who said he swithced from using NAPCO
equipment to using DSC Security (Made in Canada) equipment because
NAPCO wasn't keeping up with the technology advances being made in the
security system industry. Has anyone had any experience with DSC
and/or Chris? Any info. would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
-SD-
|
296.81 | Thumbs up for Eaglestar !! | VWBUG::SCHNEIDER | Joe Schneider | Fri Jul 26 1991 17:14 | 31 |
| Hi,
We built a house last year and had rough wiring done for an alarm
system. We just recently (last month) had the finish work done
since there were several break-ins on the street.
Our original installer was SafeGuard from Worcester, Eaglestar
bought SafeGuard and did the finish work.
The equipment is excellent. I know is works very well since it's
trapped us a few times we were careless. the doors are all wired
and there are several motion detectors - cellar and two on first floor.
We decided not to do the windows due to cost per, and motions can cover
them all for a lot less.
Anyway, Chris is the kind of person that you read about in those
how 'to treat customer' books. He makes you feel like your his most
important customer. I called SafeGuard to finish the work
Chris called me back several times to be sure the date and times
were going to be ok. Even called the night before to double check.
He was very nice and cleaned up after the job was done.
He showed my wife how to use the system while I was at work. I called
him about a few things she didn't remember and he drove an hour
on a Saturday to give me the training himself.
He was to the minute on time also.
Now if all the contractors were as efficient and freindly as this guy,
building a house would be a great experience and not the night-mare
most of us tend to experience.
Tell him I said 'hello'.
|
296.158 | Shop around... more | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Thu Jun 04 1992 14:12 | 7 |
| I was recently quoted $16 and $16.50/month by two different firms.
(in greater Lawrence/Andover area)
Compared to the previous notes, this is a very good deal.
Are prices down, or is just cheaper out-this-way?
Dave.
|
296.159 | ARRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOO | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Thu Jun 04 1992 16:54 | 3 |
| Considering that it's Lawrence, it's probably economies of scale.
PBM
|
296.160 | just FYI, since it was news to me | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Fri Jun 05 1992 09:14 | 17 |
| [just a quick FYI since this topic came back to the unseen list]
I live in a town just outside of Worcester (Charlton). Our home monitoring
is from a Worcester based company. I was talking to them the other day
about a false alarm (wind blew open a window not properly closed), and
he was telling me that the Police are starting to charge for false alarms
that they have to respond to. Something like:
1st one - free
2cd, 3rd - $25
4th, 5th - $50
6th, up - $100
I don't recall if these were yearly, monthly, or lifetime counts. Although
my town hasn't instituted these yet, he warned that it was probably coming
soon.
Dan
|
296.161 | False alarm penalty | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:04 | 9 |
| Re .6
This is a pretty common practice today. My town requires a no-fee
permit issued by the police department, just so they'll know that
the system is there and who to call, and you're allowed one "free"
false alarm per year. More than that costs you $25 each.
PBM
|
296.162 | I question the need for home monitoring, in some cases anyway... | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Fri Jun 05 1992 11:50 | 17 |
| What are the advantages of having some company "monitor" your home vs.
having a decent "stand-alone" alarm system? Several of my neighbors
have their homes monitored by a company in Salem, NH (we live in
Haverhill, MA) and I just cannot make sense of this, let alone
justifying the monthly fee. I mean, someone tries to break in,
alarm/siren goes off, intruder takes off, neighbors hear siren and call
the police. What more will a monitoring company offer that's worth
paying them?
I suppose if your house is on 5 acres and isolated from other houses,
it would be justifiable, but in a neighborhood like mine, 70 homes each
on 1/5th acre lots, I don't see the need. Or, am I overlooking
something?
Thanks,
John
|
296.163 | Why monitor? | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Fri Jun 05 1992 12:18 | 19 |
| Re .8
There's no guarantee that your neighbors will either (1) be at home,
awake, and alert when the break-in takes place, or (2) will call the
police if they hear the siren. Secondly, if you plan an intrusion
alarm, the additional cost for a fire alarm is relatively small;
a monitored fire alarm will provide warning long before flames are
visible and noticed.
Realize that nothing will prevent professionals from breaking into
your home if they're determined to do so. However, although they
can cut the 'phone line, they can't shut off the siren from the
outside, therefore you need both monitoring and a local noisemaker.
Your objective is, quite frankly, to encourage the amateur vandals
to move on to the nearest house that doesn't have a warning sticker
on the door.
PBM
|
296.164 | local trends | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Fri Jun 05 1992 14:35 | 16 |
| RE: Towns charging for False Alarms
There was an article about this in the Boston Globe about a month ago.
(might have been the NorthWest weekly section)
Of course, towns are free to set their own policies, so you should ask
your local Police department. Some PDs won't take calls at all. The
article was basically warning of the problems that PDs have with the
volume of false calls and how they would attempt to make people more
accountable. Some towns may charge you direct, or charge the Monitoring
service. You can bet that the service will get back to you.
(further discussion of other issues should probably be in the main
Burglar alarm topic #1314)
Dave.
|
296.165 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Fri Jun 05 1992 14:39 | 11 |
| In addition to break-ins and fire, our alarm system has a special
"ambush" mode. If someone follows you to your door and tells you to open
the door and disable the alarm, you enter a special ambush code that
makes the alarm look like it's been disabled, but it still notifies the
monitoring company...
And don't forget the (less tangible) feeling of safety. Having it
monitored gives my wife a better feeling of safety while I'm away on
business...
Dan
|
296.166 | Monitored system = save money | ESMAIL::SIMPSON | | Fri Jun 05 1992 16:51 | 9 |
| Our alarm has the "ambush" feature as well as a "panic" feature. If
you're in the house (without the alarm on) and someone is breaking in
you can push a couple of buttons which turns on the siren and notifies
the monitor company to call the police immediately. There is also a
"panic" mode for fire as well. Along with the sense of security, most
insurance companies will give you a discount on your homeowners policy
if you have a monitored system.
Ed
|
296.167 | Beginning to understand better... | SASE::SZABO | A Day In The Life. | Fri Jun 05 1992 17:00 | 6 |
| The last few replies are exactly what I was looking for. These are
the kinds of features and reasons for monitoring companies that I was
unaware of. Thanks.
John
|
296.168 | Options and arrangements you can have | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Jun 08 1992 13:50 | 23 |
| Since we've fallen into discussing monitoring features....
My system has a three two-key emergency combinations: Police, Fire,
and Medical, as well as the "Duress" password option. (which disarms the
system but makes a call silently)
The system has the option to make the Police combo silent too.
(eg: no local siren noise)
The way that all these things work, is that the monitoring company
gets the call with a "reason code" attached. Then they do the right
thing.
My system, at least, cannot just call anyone by voice. The system
knows 4 popular digital protocols (think of them as specialized modem
encodings). You arrange with the monitoring company to select one.
Your account number needs to be programmed into your system so they
know who is calling.
Dave.
btw: this is a Moose Systems Z1100 which the previous owner left me
the installer's manual.
|
296.169 | First-pass false alarm filter | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Mon Jun 22 1992 19:53 | 11 |
| When I was looking at systems for my home in Colorado Springs, I was told
the following by a company trying to sell me a monitoring service:
Due to the number of false alarms, the Colorado Springs police
department will only respond to alarms forwarded through a monitoring
company. The monitoring company first telephones the site of the
alarm to see if it was a false alarm. They have a password system
so that you can indicate you are in trouble/hostage situation.
Thus, the main function of the monitoring company is to act as a first-pass
filter to reduce the load on police.
|
296.82 | suggestions for running wire? | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Mon Sep 28 1992 18:22 | 16 |
| I've decided I'm going to install a (wired) alarm system in my house.
I would like to see if I can profit from anyone else's experiences in
the matter of actually installing the sensors.
I plan to install sensors on all windows and (outside) doors.
However, the more I look at my windows, the less sure I am about the
best way to try to run the wires. I don't want to have a lot of
wires visible around my windows (I don't care how small the wire is, it
still looks amateurish...). Howvever, I am mystified when I try to
figure out how to run the wires from the window sensors into the wall
and to the control center.
Does anyone have any general suggestions (or anecdotal information) for
running sensor wires in existing walls without killing myself?
/doug
|
296.83 | small wire...small Idea | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Sep 29 1992 07:39 | 7 |
|
well, you can always cut a small grove into your
sheetrock down to the baseboard. Run the wire in
there and touch it up with mud and paint....
JD
|
296.84 | How about Motion Detectors | FRMND3::morency | | Tue Sep 29 1992 10:42 | 13 |
|
A much cheaper and less time consuming solution would be to
install area motion detectors instead of sensors on each of the
windows. I have a center entry colonial and with two motion
detectors can monitor most of the down stairs of the house. Your
case may vary but I would think that a few motion detectors
would be easier to install then many window sensors. The only
thing to be aware of is that motion detectors are not a good
solution if you have pets that wonder the house when you are
gone or asleep.
Frank
|
296.85 | Considered. Discarded. | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Tue Sep 29 1992 14:30 | 17 |
| > The only
> thing to be aware of is that motion detectors are not a good
> solution if you have pets that wonder the house when you are
> gone or asleep.
Bingo. We have cats that would inevitably set off motion detectors.
Believe me, I have studied this for quite some time and spoken to a lot
of people. I had seriously hoped to be able to get away with just
installing a few motion detectors, but I have heard more than enough
tales of false alarms and how straightforward it is to defeat motion
detectors to convince me that wired sensors are my design center.
So, does anyone out there, have any hard-won wiring hints that they'd
care to share?
/doug
|
296.86 | Wireless? | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:06 | 5 |
| Have you looked into the alarm systems that use battery-powered sensors? The
sensor has an RF or ultrasonic transmitter. Each sensor periodically
transmits its status, which permits detection of dead batteries.
I've seen these systems displayed at home shows.
|
296.87 | Keep it simple | CSTEAM::BURSTALL | | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:47 | 13 |
| From personal experience having installed NUMEROUS (25+) alarm system in
both my own house and those of friends, it is far simpler, quicker, and
more professional to use a looooonnnnnngggggg drill. What I did was get
a 8' piece of drill rod and then had a 3/8 drill bit brazed onto the
end of the drill rod. Total cost was less than $20.
Near the point of the drill bit I drilled a 1/4" hole which allowes for
feeding the wires at the same time as you remove the bit.
Plane and simple works every time.
Ken
|
296.88 | pets and kids too | MATE::PJOHNSON | | Tue Sep 29 1992 21:37 | 6 |
| Motion detectors can be a problem, not only with pets, but with
children or yourself getting up in the night. Our system has both
door and window sensors and a motion detector which can be shunted
when you're at home. This seems to work well for me.
Phil
|
296.89 | yes, but: | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Tue Sep 29 1992 22:35 | 7 |
| Thanks to all for suggestions about wireless solutions, but I have considered
and discarded wireless designs.
Now for those who have installed wired systems, how did you go about running
the wires in the walls?
/doug
|
296.90 | ribbon cable? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Wed Sep 30 1992 10:54 | 11 |
|
If you are only running it down to the baseboard, how about using flat
ribbon cable for that short run & join to a twisted pair for the run
behind the baseboard? You could paint over the ribbon cable or even
wallpaper over it. If you want to chase it in, it's simply a matter
of removing a few mm of the surface.
Colin
|
296.91 | for astetics | CSDNET::DICASTRO | jet ski jockey | Thu Oct 01 1992 16:02 | 25 |
|
Do you have a single fam. home, multi level, 3 fam. etc.....?
All cables to feed wall mounted devices should be snaked into the wall.
Drill a 1" hole where you are going to mount the device, and (if you
can) drill up into the wall from the basement. Run the snake from the
basement to the hole. Pull the basement snake out of the wall w/ a tool
or 2nd snake. For door magnets, drill into the door jamb, and drill up
from the basement as described for walls. OPtion #2 for wall munted
devices (motion detectors). Run a 1/2 dozen (or required #) of cables
frm basement, through a conduit in the back of a closet (1/2" emt),
distribute the cables in the attic, and down through the ceiling,
however, you should drill from the ceilig up, to locate holes.
For more specific answers , you need to ask more specific questions.
Dont forget you can run cable under rugs, mouldings, along/behind door
frames, through cabinets, closets etc.....
Stay away from painting over ribbon cable, and gouging sheetrock,
then replastering. Worst case, get some lo profile surface raceway
at any electrical supplier.
questions ?
|
296.92 | answers and more questions. | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Fri Oct 02 1992 10:41 | 39 |
| re -.1 Thanks for the specific feedback. Here's more detail and a few
more questions:
My house is a single-family split entry with a finished basement. The
finished basement is going to make pulling wires through the basement
just about impossible. I've about resigned myself to drilling down
from the attic for all of the upstairs sensors and just 'punting' for
each of the sensors downstairs...
Arming a door with sidelights ?
-------------------------------
On my front door I don't think I can use the typical 'drill in' sensors
that you put into the jamb and door. The door has sidelights right
next to the jamb and that makes running wires a bit of a problem. I
*might* be able to put some sort of sensor into the threshold, but I
feel a little uneasy about that (seems like the sensor would get a lot
of abuse being down there...) I'm thinking I may have to just mount
one of those surface mount reed switch sensors (like a window sensor)
at the top of the door...
Minimizing sheetrock repair ?
-----------------------------
How do you minimize the 'sheetrock abuse' when you drill holes for
window sensors? Do you pull off the molding on the side of the window,
drill, snake, install then replace the molding over the wire?
How to arm windows at either full-close or half-closed position ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm also thinking about installing a 'double-sensor' system on some of
my windows so I can either have them completely closed or leave them
1/2 open in the summer for ventilation and still have the windows
'armed' (i.e. when they are opened further, the sensor will trip).
Has anyone done this sort of thing and is there a cheaper way to do it
beyond installing 2 sensors?
Thanks for the input.
/doug
|
296.93 | Don't run wires under a rug! | AWECIM::MCMAHON | Code so clean you can eat off it! | Fri Oct 02 1992 14:05 | 3 |
| I would strongly advise running any kind of wire under a rug or
carpeting. It is too easy for the wire to get worn/frayed without you
knowing it and start a fire.
|
296.94 | A few ideas/ its been a while....... | CSDNET::DICASTRO | jet ski jockey | Fri Oct 02 1992 14:26 | 36 |
| Re -.1
>I would strongly advise running any.........
I think you meant "I would strongly advise _NOT_ run any....."
re-.2
Anyway, what type of ceiling do you have in the basement, is it a drop
ceiling....? Most ceilings and walls are accessible, start thinking in
more generic terms w/ regard to the structure and framing ofthe house.
As far as minimizing sheetrock damage, make sure the pilot hole you
drill (at the device) can be covered w/ the device itself, and that you
do not initially drill into a stud (pick your favorite stud location
method). Also a sheet of newspaper below the work area greatly
minimizes clean up time.......
Windows:
You can use the 2 magnet method. 1 sensor on the frame, and 2 magnets
on the window. 1 for the closed position, and 1 for partway open.
You want to be sure the you have snug windows ! There is now a
combination sensor for windows, it is the sonic detector (reacts to
breaking glass) and has the magnetized switch for the application
you described. The frawback is you need 4 wires, 2 switched, 2 power.
Doors,
you do not have to put a "depression switch" for the doors (some thing
in the door janb or threshold, that when depressed, opens or closes a
switch). You can put a "in jamb" magnet setup. A cylindrical magnet is
put into the door itself (use a little wood glue), and the wired
switch piece goes anywhere around the frame , top/bottom/sides (and it
must line up w/ the magnet 8^} ). Thay way you do not have to worry
about wear and tear.
|
296.95 | | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Fri Oct 02 1992 15:18 | 32 |
| > Anyway, what type of ceiling do you have in the basement, is it a drop
> ceiling....? Most ceilings and walls are accessible, start thinking in
If only it *were* a drop ceiling... It's a regular sheetrock ceiling, screwed
to the joists. There's no way to get in without making a mess of the basement
ceiling... It may be unavoidable, though....
> You can use the 2 magnet method. 1 sensor on the frame, and 2 magnets
> on the window. 1 for the closed position, and 1 for partway open.
That's actually what I meant when I said "2 sensors". Anyway, you still have
to actually buy two complete sensor units, even though you're only using 1.5,
right? Or can you pick up the magnets, separately? If so then great.
re: doors:
> switch). You can put a "in jamb" magnet setup. A cylindrical magnet is
> put into the door itself (use a little wood glue), and the wired
> switch piece goes anywhere around the frame , top/bottom/sides (and it
> must line up w/ the magnet 8^} ). Thay way you do not have to worry
> about wear and tear.
That's exactly what I want to put in, but the front door is steel clad and the
jamb (where you'd drill the sensor piece into) directly abuts a sidelight
panel. This panel *not* wood and you cannot drill a channel through it
without ruining it. If the entry just butted into a wall, it'd be
straightforward.
thanks anyway.
(This job is looking uglier and uglier all the time....)
/doug
|
296.96 | | LEDDEV::LAVRANOS | | Wed Oct 21 1992 17:27 | 26 |
|
For the past couple of months we've been considering having a security
system installed. A major concern of ours is having motion detectors
since we have 2 cats. When we are away the cats are locked in the
basement, but when we are home they have free roam. I had Bill, from B
& J Custom Alarms, check out our place and he said that if the sensors
are placed correctly then the cats won't set them off. Is this true?
He quoted us ~ $1400 for the setup below. We own a 3-story townhouse.
1 Panel - MA-2600, 16 zones
2 Keypads
2 Sirens
2 Motions - Basement, main floor
3 Doors - Basement, main entrance, door from basement to main floor
2 Windows - Basement
Any comments on the quote? He owns the monitoring station and it's
$15/month.
Let's say we decide not to go with motion detectors, does it make sense
to spend the money on a security system comprised of only door/window
switches? If we decided not to go with sensors I would have 6 more
windows on the main floor wired instead.
...Rania
|
296.97 | | WILBRY::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 264-5515 | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:28 | 16 |
| re: sensors and cats
While in Florida staying with friends in August, I learned a
bit about their security system. They have a full system with
motion sensors and the door/window detectors. However, their
system allows them to selectively set the motion detectors
off and on at will, while leaving the other sensors functioning.
This way, they leave the motion sensors on while they're not
at home, and turn them off while they are at home so the
dogs/cats/themselves won't set them off - a good compromise
from what I observed. Can't comment on the price, however.
just my $.02
andy
|
296.98 | B&J gets my vote | TEXAS1::SIMPSON | | Thu Oct 22 1992 16:40 | 22 |
|
Bill installed our system back in Feb. He is very much a
perfectionist when it comes to the installation. I asked
him the same question about small pets... got the same answer.
I don't usually have any pets around so I didn't have him
set up the motion sensors that way. The system he uses will
allow you to do exactly as the last reply stated.... turn off
the sensors (or any particular door/window if you want). We
arm just the doors and windows quite often... it's a very handy
feature.
Our alarm has been tripped (by us or other family members) a
couple of times and they were on the phone to us within a
minute or two. The last time was by a family member who didn't
remember their code.... Joan (from B&J) was really tough to
convince that it was ok and not call the police.
I am very happy with the system and would highly recommend them
to anyone. Their monthly fee is about the best deal around.
If you have him do the work... tell him I said Hi.
Ed Simpson
|
296.99 | Thanks | LEDDEV::LAVRANOS | | Fri Oct 23 1992 09:15 | 16 |
| Thanks for the replies.
I know I can turn off the motion detectors and leave the window/doors
alarmed. I'm just not sure it's worth installing the motions if I
rarely use them, (turning them off so that the cats don't accidentally
trip them).
I agree, Bill does seem to know the alarm business. I also find it
hard to believe he would install motions if they don't work with pets.
After all, he owns the station and wouldn't want false alarms set off
by pets!
So does anyone else out there have any experience with pets and motion
detectors? I need some more information to pass on to my husband.
...Rania
|
296.100 | anything that moves more than once.... | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Fri Oct 23 1992 10:05 | 17 |
|
Not exactly pets. My experience of alarm systems is as a keyholder
for bank offices. When you get hauled out of a warm bed at 3:00AM,
it tends to make you interested in the technology! Motion detectors
are usually the component causing false alarms. In one office, they
went off at least twice a month until we tracked the problem - Monstera
plants (Swiss Cheese) moving in the draught from an air duct.
One engineer told me that mice, moving curtains or automatic fans
can sometimes set them off, as can brownouts & spikes.
Mice definitely won't be a problem for you, but does your cat climb
the curtains? ;-)
Regrds,
Colin
|
296.101 | plan your coverage | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Fri Oct 23 1992 14:18 | 22 |
| I think the trick with motion sensors and pets, is to aim the sensors
high enough to ignore a cat/dog on the floor, but catch a standing human.
It probably depends mostly on the design of the sensor to have a height
horizon.
Now, cats climbing curtains and furniture will quickly negate this
benefit. And as he said, watch out for the affects of "wind" or FHA.
Depending on the design of the sensor, some can detect things moving
_outside_ a window. The aim should be planned to avoid such views.
My house (recently purchased) has a security system with just door and
window detectors. I consider it fairly secure. You have to think
about what it is that additional motion sensors would detect that
door detectors would not.
The only feature I see is covering large glass doors or areas you
cannot otherwise get. In my house the inconvience may be such that
if I put in some motion sensors, I would probably only arm them when
out-of-town.
Dave.
|
296.102 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Sat Oct 24 1992 19:57 | 17 |
| > You have to think
> about what it is that additional motion sensors would detect that
> door detectors would not.
>
> The only feature I see is covering large glass doors or areas you
> cannot otherwise get.
The house we recently bought, in addition to doors and windows and a
motion decector, it has 3 'sound detectors'. Basically it detects the
high pitched sound of breaking glass. Of course, glass can be carefully
cut open so as not to make any noise... I guess that's what the motion
detector is for... It's a matter of what you consider secure...
The lady we bought the house from had the system put in about 4 years
ago - I think she said it cost about $1500-1700.
Dan
|
296.103 | Call answering and alarm systems | MILPND::STUART | | Tue Nov 10 1992 12:29 | 16 |
|
I don't have an alarm system (unless two dogs count) but I saw on
the news a warning to alarm owners about getting "call answering"
which is the same as voice mail. Systems that place a call to the
Police Dept. can get lunched if you have it installed.
Most systems require a constant dial tone to place a call. When a
message is left you get the pulsating dial tone and it can screw up
your alarm system. They mentioned that it could be a costly repair,
anyone catch exactly what happens to the system ??
They also mentioned that the phone company so far, issues no warnings
of this to potential buyers.
Should make for interesting conversation....
Randy
|
296.104 | | LEDDEV::LAVRANOS | | Tue Nov 17 1992 12:42 | 6 |
| Well, I now have quotes from 3 companies. Two of the three use Napco
while the third uses FBI. Does anyone know if these two manufacturers
are comparable?
...Rania
|
296.105 | FBI and Napco are both large manufacturers. | STUDIO::JOMALLEY | | Wed Nov 18 1992 14:12 | 11 |
| Rania,
Napco and FBI are both major suppliers of Burglar alarm equipment.
I've owned two houses. The first house had a Napco system and I just
had a FBI system installed in my present house. Both system worked
well but, I find that the FBI system is easier to operate. We have had
the FBI system ~6 weeks and have yet to have anybody (myself, my wife
and 2 kids (11 and 14)). cause a 'false' alarm. I think you will be
happy with either manufacturer equipment.
Jim O'
|
296.106 | Alarms activated by air pressure changes (volumetric)? | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Opportunities are our Future | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:55 | 20 |
| Any opinions on so-called volumetric alarm systems, which are activated by
sudden changes in air pressure (or subsonics resulting from them)
caused by doors or windows opening quickly?
The main advantage seems to be essentially no installation effort to
get a perimeter alarm system. The second advantage (for the system we saw)
was an outside alarm with its own battery backup, so that the exterior
alarm would sound if the wires were cut or the interior unit destroyed.
The likely disadvantages seem to be possible false alarms or possible
failure to detect a break-in (especially during summer when upstairs
windows may be open all the way). I have no way of gauging this, so this
is the fundamental question I'm asking.
The system we saw was made by Quorum International, Limited, which we were
told is a subsidiary of American Electronics.
Gary
(Cross posted to ElectroHobby)
|
296.107 | Some recent alarm experiences | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | SDT Software Engineering Process Group | Wed Aug 25 1993 11:54 | 32 |
| We've successfully installed our alarm system, and it even worked
first time. I have two questions and a comment:
Question: The sensors appear to have aluminum wires (stranded). We've
used 16 gauge stranded copper for the runs, and soldered them together.
How long should we expect a Cu/Al solder joint, carrying low voltage
and current to last (or was there something better for us to use)?
The usual Cu/Al fire concerns shouldn't be an issue, because this is
a low voltage circuit.
Second question: What should be used to insulate the solder joints? Wire
nuts? Heat-shrink tubing? Electric tape (gasp -- but perhaps it's ok
for a low voltage application; I don't know).
Comment: For a single loop run to several doors/windows, where you send
one wire to door A, then another wire from door A to door B, continuing
until you get back to the panel, there doesn't seem to be much difference
between a vanilla (Class B) closed loop system (circuit normally closed)
and a supervised (Class A) closed loop system (a resistor wired in to the
circut). Shorting around the resistor will set off the alarm, but the
resistor is only at one point in the circuit. Shorting around a closed
loop switch can't set it off. I suppose this is tautological.
To get the real benefit of a system that can detect both shorts and open
circuits, you need to run at least two wires through the entire loop.
Then you can randomly put closed loop sensors into one or the other wires,
or open loop sensors across them. This increases the odds significantly
in your favor. [I recall seeing a similar note somewhere on this,
suggesting running four conductor cable; I now have a better understanding
of that note.]
Gary
|
296.108 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Wed Aug 25 1993 12:17 | 3 |
| Try soldering one of the "aluminum" wires; you may discover
it's tinned copper, in which case all your Cu/Al concerns
disappear.
|
296.109 | Sounds fine to me | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Wed Aug 25 1993 13:49 | 14 |
|
If you soldered the wires together easily, it's most likely tinned
copper, as Steve suggested. Even if it is Aluminum, you will never have
a fire problem with that type of circuit. The reason its a problem with
120V house wiring is that the joint (never soldered) deteriorates and
the current through it causes enough heat to start adjacent materials
on fire)
I'd use heat shrink to cover the soldered connections - if you can
still get it on. If not, there is a brush-on rubber coating that seals
very nicely. You might try that. You can't use either for 120V wiring,
but for your security system, its just fine.
Kenny
|
296.110 | aluminum is tough to solder.. | TEKVAX::KOPEC | Free Stupidity Screening $5 | Fri Aug 27 1993 12:58 | 4 |
| If you soldered it without resorting to exotic fluxes, it wasn't
aluminum. Or it's a bad joint 8-(
...tom
|
296.111 | only some cases? | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Aug 30 1993 14:57 | 11 |
| RE: resistor loop circuits
This has confused me too, but I haven't thought about it much recently.
Perhaps if the resistor wasn't on the panel, but at the remote end of
the run, any attempt to short the run would drop it out.
Are there any books out there on the "theory" and design of alarm
loops?
Dave.
|
296.112 | wiring topology | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | SDT Software Engineering Process Group | Fri Sep 17 1993 18:33 | 43 |
| Sorry for the delay, but we just got back from vacation.
I guess it must be tinned copper, since the joints seem fine -- everthing
worked the first time. Heat-shrink tubing worked as the insulator,
since all of the joints were done as T's, and not inline (i.e. twisted
together the way you would if you were using WireNuts, but soldered
and then covered with heat-shrink).
re: .84
What you're saying is theoretically correct, but ignores the
pragmatics or topology of running wires. I've tested our system, and yes,
if you short around the resistor, the alarm will be triggered.
However, the wiring topology doesn't necessarily present two wires, one on
either side of the resistor at the end of the run. Consider the following,
where you run a single wire from the alarm box to door 1, another wire
from door 1 to door 2, and another wire from door 2 directly back
to the alarm:
door 1(nc) door 2
| ______________/ _____________________/ (nc)
Alarm | \
| /
| \ resistor
| ______________________________________/
With single wires (cheaper, possibly easier), then shorting around
door 2 (which has both the switch and the end-of-line resistor) will
trigger the alarm. Shorting around door 1 won't trigger the alarm.
Running dual wires is more secure -- two wires to door 1, then two wires to
door 2 gets the desired effect, provided you hide the vulnerable
points. The two sides of a closed-loop switch are always vulnerable,
but if you can't easily tell which two of the four wires represent
those two points, then the odds are in favor of triggering the alarm.
This will frequently take more wire; it could even push the voltage
drop to the point that you need a heavier gauge wire,
We only have one case where this is a problem, and I intend to fix
that case.
Gary
|
296.182 | blast from the past | VAXUUM::T_PARMENTER | Unsung Superstar | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:19 | 9 |
| A friend is looking for a device like the Whole Home Sentry discussed
in this note:
phone answering machine with various peripherals to tell
temperature, alarm, detect wetness and report it all to him
Does anyone have any recent information. He's just bought a house on
the Cape and he's worried about it.
|
296.150 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon Apr 04 1994 11:26 | 14 |
|
I was surprised that the "keywords" didn't have either "alarm" or "burglar".
It was only with a "title search" that I was able to find alarm info in
this file.
My house was robbed (lost my computer system and violin amongst other things)
last Tuesday. It feels scary just to go home now, jitters and fears that
someone might be there.
So, I'm thinking about an alarm (or else not restocking the house!)
Off I go to the other note that has 85 replies ... (1314)
|
296.113 | questions about possible systems | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon Apr 04 1994 12:45 | 41 |
|
My house was robbed last Tuesday, not a pleasant experience I can tell you.
The worst is the feeling of uneasiness every time I go home now.
So I'm thinking about what sort of things to install.
This particular burglary was they managed to open the window lock latch
which I must not have turned COMPLETELY. They slipped a nife between
the two windows (after slitting screen to reach in and slide it up) and
turned the latch.
They stole my violin, entire computer system with printer and modem, vcr,
clock radio.
The questions that I have:
o For my several first-floor windows, has anyone had any experience
with window bars ? Such would allow me to leave windows open for
air in summer. Are such things practical ?
o I'm thinking about those flood lights that automatically turn on
with motion. Do security companies install these ? ('m too lazy
to do it myself, let alone fix typos )
o if I buy an alarm system, do I need a dedicated phone line ? If not,
what about the voicemail stutter dial tone confusion ?
Is the verdict in on that one yet ?
o If I do get an alarm system, what if burglar cuts phone line. (Mine
comes into house at arm's reach level !)
o There was some discussion about summer heat causing false alarms
with motion detector alarms, and thunder storm causing false alarms
with sonar ones, and that double detectors were the way to go. Is
that really still the way to go ?
o What's a good alarm company in Waltham (that's where I live).
Thanks.
/Eric
|
296.114 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Mon Apr 04 1994 13:54 | 11 |
|
/Eric,
Try SONITROL. They have worked problems and have come up with
solutions. We have been happy (???) users since 1985 when we
was robbed (as they say in the business)!
Good luck.
justme....jacqui
|
296.115 | A cheap solution to window locks | DFSAXP::JP | And the winner is.... | Mon Apr 04 1994 14:11 | 8 |
| Re: window locks
If they can be hidden by drapes, try drilling a hole thru both sashes and
inserting a nail. Drill into the top corner of the lower sash with the windows
closed, then open the window for a draft, and drill again using the same hole in
the lower sash. The nail head can be painted with the trim color. I've done
this on a few windows, and it works like a charm. Even kept my wife out the
last time she locked her keys in the car.
|
296.116 | Side window locks | NOVA::SWONGER | DBS Software Quality Engineering | Mon Apr 04 1994 16:05 | 9 |
| re: Side window locks
I could swear that I've seen window locks that are meant to slide
into a hole drilled in the side of the frame (as opposed to the type
that lock the two sashes together), but I've been unable to find
these in any of the various home center type places. Has anybody
else seen this tyep of sash lock for sale anywhere?
Roy
|
296.117 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Mon Apr 04 1994 17:21 | 11 |
| >o If I do get an alarm system, what if burglar cuts phone line. (Mine
> comes into house at arm's reach level !)
Then you hope that the [very loud] alarm horn is enough to scare them away.
Actually, once you plaster your doors and windows with those little signs
saying, "warning - protected by such-n-such alarm company", many crooks will
think twice and hopefully look for an easier place... Unless they know your
house contains something very valuable and worth the risk.
Dan
|
296.151 | Not always feasible... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Tue Apr 05 1994 02:14 | 9 |
| >last Tuesday. It feels scary just to go home now, jitters and fears that
>someone might be there.
Have you ever considered getting a dog. They're one of the
best deterents to burglers. And they're always there to greet
you when you come home.
Just a thought.
Tim
|
296.118 | Get'um Fidoo | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Apr 05 1994 08:37 | 10 |
|
Locks are for honst people. If someone is gone to breakin....then
a lock isnt going to hinder them.
As far as the "little signs " go. I'd put the ones that didnt match
the system. Woundnt want to make anything easy.....
Bear traps work good. Unless you sleep walk..........
|
296.152 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Apr 05 1994 10:26 | 3 |
| >I was surprised that the "keywords" didn't have either "alarm" or "burglar".
The keyword is SECURITY.
|
296.153 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Tue Apr 05 1994 12:56 | 8 |
|
No, I didn't think of that keyword.
As for dog, I love dogs, but I'm not home until late almost every night, and
I live alone, so I wouldn't want to leave dog alone.
/Eric
|
296.119 | organic burglar alarms | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Apr 12 1994 14:13 | 6 |
| Dogs can be very effective burglar alarms and deterents. They keep
working despite utility outages. Their startup cost is less, too,
though they need a lot more maintenance.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
296.120 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Wed Apr 13 1994 16:20 | 39 |
|
An update on my situation:
I bought an alarm system from US Protective Alarm in Waltham.
I don't want a dog because I'm not home much, so it would be cruel to keep
a dog lonely.
This alarm system will still work if AC power dies. It has a rechargable
backup battery.
I don't have a basement (slab foundation) so they sold me a wireless system.
It's a pretty penny though, about $800 plus $19.change a month for the connection
to central office (that then calls police if they can't reach me).
Wireless means that at each window and door (I did 3 windows and 2 doors) is
a 9-volt battery-operated transmitter. The keypad (which *is* wired to the
locked metal box) tells when one of the batteries is low and indicates
which one.
There's also a motion detector, also wireless with a battery.
System has all the usual stuff, test mode, "stay home" mode, alternate codes.
The system siezes phone line. Hence any phone use in the house won't prevent
it from calling central office (although if a thief actually cut line that enters
the house, it would prevent it, but the loud alarm sound would hopefully still
be a deterrent).
By the way, the actual hardware is a company called "Ademco". Any of you familiar
with it ?
Thanks.
/Eric
p.s. We tested to make sure the stutter dial-tone due to voice mail messages
didn't confuse it.
|
296.121 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Apr 13 1994 16:23 | 4 |
| Ademco is a well-known supplier of alarm equipment. One of the largest in
the industry, I believe.
Steve
|
296.122 | | KEPNUT::WOLF | Cherokee N15802 | Thu Apr 14 1994 09:12 | 5 |
| Just out of curiosity does anybody know if these systems can be
connected via a cellular phone? Seems this would resolve the cutting
the phone line problem.
Bob
|
296.123 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Apr 14 1994 10:57 | 3 |
| Yes, they can.
Steve
|
296.124 | | HYDRA::BECK | Paul Beck | Thu Apr 14 1994 11:38 | 2 |
| ... but then, all the bad guys need to do is build a Faraday cage around
your house before they break in.
|
296.125 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Apr 14 1994 14:22 | 7 |
|
some systems are set so that the base monitor flags them to call
the owner or the police when a power outage of any kind takes
place or the phone lines are cut. more expensive system though.
|
296.126 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Fri Apr 15 1994 12:14 | 7 |
|
>some systems are set so that the base monitor flags them to call
>the owner or the police when a power outage of any kind takes
>place or the phone lines are cut. more expensive system though.
Please explain how it can call *anyone* if the phone lines are cut
|
296.127 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Fri Apr 15 1994 12:19 | 8 |
| I think some are more like a point to point circuit vs a normal
phone line that has equipment at either the local CO or at an alarm
company that reports an open circuit as a cut line. Also these
days I would not doubt some type of cellular phone type system
in the home that works on the same principal.
Just a guess
|
296.128 | Alarm components | NAC::ALBRIGHT | Born to DECserver | Sun May 01 1994 23:09 | 6 |
| Our home was wired for an alarm system by the previous owners but the
system was never completed. We're waiting for a quote from ADT to reuse
the wiring but I got to thinking about finishing it myself. There use
to be a company called Mountain West that sold a wide variety of alarm
components. Are they still around? Any other sources for alarm
components besides R Shack?
|
296.129 | fyi | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Mon May 02 1994 09:53 | 17 |
|
>> <<< Note 1314.101 by NAC::ALBRIGHT "Born to DECserver" >>>
>> -< Alarm components >-
>> components. Are they still around? Any other sources for alarm
>> components besides R Shack?
Consumer reports did a story on alarm systems in this months issue.
Surprisingly, they like the Radio Shack brand the best in both the
wireless and wired categories for DYI. For the installed brands, they
didn't find much difference.
DYI brands - $200-$600
Installed brands - $1000 +
Garry
|
296.130 | RE: Alarm components | LANDO::WOODS | | Mon May 02 1994 11:11 | 25 |
|
RE: .-2
Mountain West Alarm supply is indeed still around. They are a pleasure
to do business with and supply high quality security components.
(Ademco, Amseco, Moose, FBI, Gentex, Ace, Medeco, to name a few.) If
you are planning on completing the installation yourself, I would
advise againt a panel from Radio Shack. Their panels do not provide
the built-in communicator that the professional panels do. Mountain West
supplies, among others, Moose (the Z1100-E is a good panel) and Fire
Burglery Instruments (FBI) (The Star XL4600 is a good panel also)
Features vary between the two. The several FBI panels that I have
worked with are ROCK solid. I have never seen any false alarm
attributed to a fault in the panel.
I don't have the address for Mountain West here with me, but I do at
home. I'll post it when I can get it.
Oh, By the way. A panel with a built-in communicator does not have to
be monitored, but it does give you the option if you decide to sign up
with a monitoring company at a later date. A simple reprogramming of
the panel from the keypad and connection to the phone line is all that
is necessary.
|
296.131 | Locations, locations??? | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon May 02 1994 13:10 | 7 |
| I would like to know where Mountain West is also.
I have also found an alarm supply store in Woburn, where I picked up an
RJ31-X jack and cable. I should be able to get the name and
particulars from the receipt.
Dave.
|
296.132 | Address | LANDO::WOODS | | Mon May 02 1994 21:58 | 12 |
|
Re: .-2
Address of Mountain West Alarm Supply
Alpha Omega Security Group
dba/Mountain West Alarm Supply
9420 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd., 102
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
Phone # (602) 971-1200 or (602) 263-8831
|
296.133 | Alarm Devices Supply in Woburn | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Wed May 04 1994 10:14 | 16 |
| RE: .-2
This place is a distributor that caters to "professionals" but does
have a display area with the major vendors systems, and common parts
(eg: switches, detectors, wiring tools, etc) out for browsing.
I had no problems walking in and buying a special phone jack and cord.
(the kind that wires the alarm system in series with the house phone
circuit)
Alarm Devices Supply
245 Salem St
Woburn MA 01888
617-933-8430
Dave.
|
296.134 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | You'll never get out of this maze! | Fri Jun 10 1994 11:53 | 23 |
| I'm having a house built and the builder said it would be ok for me to
put the wiring in for an alarm system before the dry wall went up.
i'm going to have my brother do it for me - he used to install alarm
systems for a job at one time, so, he knows what he's doing.
the problem is where to get _all_ the parts... sensors, box, motion detectors,
etc. i live in MASS, i've made note of the recent replies for places
carrying alarm system stuff.
i'd like to get an integrated fire and burglar system, one that calls the
fire/police dept. when it goes off.
so, what i'm looking for is:
a place in MA or southern NH that sells alarm products of good
quality (ademco, napco, etc).
pointers?
advice?
thanks,
jc
|
296.135 | | LANDO::WOODS | | Fri Jun 10 1994 15:55 | 35 |
|
Most of the good panels these days do not directly 'call' the
police/fire dept. The panels are designed to communicate codes to a
central monitoring station for processing. The monitoring station is
responsible for informing the police or fire department of the event.
How much are you willing to spend? Systems can vary from a few hundred
dollars to a few thousand depending upon features, number of zones,
number of keypads etc.
Building code requires a hard wire smoke detector system in all new
dwellings. The electrician usually installs cheap 110VAC units. You
can continue to use these, and install another separate smoke detector
which is connected to your panel. This is the least expensive method.
The 'better' way is to tie the entire smoke system in. This requires
purchasing different smoke detectors and properly wiring them in as a
dedicated zone on your panel. I say properly because if you do it
incorrectly, you lose the 'supervised' feature which is really the big
win with this setup. In this case you do not have a 110 VAC system.
Instead you have a supervised, battery backup up fire loop which
receives power from your alarm panel and will continue to function
even if you lose power. If you are going this route, don't skimp on
the detectors. Gentex makes some of the best around (~$90.00/each).
Before doing this, make sure that it is acceptable to your local fire
inspector.
I would recommend Mountain West Alarm Supply for the components. (See
previous replies...)
Good luck!
- Peter
|
296.136 | some thoughts | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Fri Jun 10 1994 18:22 | 24 |
| As I noted in a previous reply; the store in Woburn has all those
things; wires, tools, etc. and complete systems for several major brands.
I don't know of other places (that is I stopped looking, not that they
aren't out there.)
WRT autodialing: Yes, these things do not typically have voice synth,
so they cannot just call anyone. Also many towns these days will not
take such calls.
I have a Moose Z100 system. It "knows" about 4 different binary
protocols and can be programmed to call a computer (2 alternate dial
sequences) and tell it what has been tripped. This kind of thing
would have to be tailored to the capabilities of the monitoring
service. I've spoken to a couple services and when you sign up, they
come out and program it for you. Some systems have this in ROM and
the service must blow a ROM for you. My Moose has an NVRAM of some
sort, and I can program it myself with no extra equipment.
Also some of these services have distinct biases toward (and against)
the various panel manufacturers. For better or worse, I would want a
service that trusts my panel type and is willing to work with it. You
may want to survey some service companies first.
Dave.
|
296.137 | | ZENDIA::FERGUSON | You'll never get out of this maze! | Tue Jun 14 1994 10:25 | 25 |
| I took Dave's advice and called a place in the area that does monitoring. it
turns out that they also are willing to sell parts to me directly to install
myself - they'll sell all the parts i need... ballpark estimate is $450-500 for
everything:
2 keypads,
2 long-range infrared,
1 short-range infra read,
6 zone ADEMCO box with future wireless capability
3 door switches
1 window switch
3 barrier bars for cellar windows
2 heat detectors
inside siren
outside siren
siren booster thingy (??)
btw, this is PRC security systems (office out of littleton ma)
also, the monitoring charge is $17 / mo. what do others pay for monitoring?
is this high? low? fair? ripoff???
thanks,
jc
|
296.138 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Tue Jun 14 1994 11:43 | 7 |
| >also, the monitoring charge is $17 / mo. what do others pay for monitoring?
>is this high? low? fair? ripoff???
$20/month (in Worcester, MA area). Used a couple times in two years -
including one very real situation while we were away on vacation...
Dan
|
296.170 | low temperature alarm and telephone autodialer | STARCH::HAGERMAN | Flames to /dev/null | Fri Nov 17 1995 14:42 | 8 |
| I'm looking for an autodialer (telephone dialer) connected to
a low temperature sensor for an unattended house. The heat is
supposed to be on all the time, but if it drops below, say, 50
degrees I want a phone call and a message. Cheapness is important.
Suggestions?
Doug.
|
296.171 | not quite what you want, but a start.. | TEKVAX::KOPEC | we're gonna need another Timmy! | Sun Nov 19 1995 06:36 | 6 |
| I've seen devices that will turn on an AC outlet if the temperature
goes below some preset amount.. I think Honeywell sells one, others
probably do too.. the idea being that you tell you neighbor to call you
if they ever see a certain light on..
...tom
|
296.172 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sun Nov 19 1995 20:47 | 4 |
| I have heard of such autodialers, but the inexpensive ones don't play
a message, just beep.
Steve
|
296.173 | NH | BIGQ::HAWKE | | Mon Nov 20 1995 09:24 | 8 |
| Re autodialer
I just saw one recenlty as described temp drops below X degrees
you get a call...*I think* it was in Northern Hydralics in the
$40 range.
Dean
|
296.175 | Consumer Reports just rated a couple | AWECIM::MCMAHON | DEC: ReClaim TheName! | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:39 | 9 |
| Funny you should mention these - FWIW Consumer Reports latest issue
(got it last week) rates two of these. One worked okay but the other
one didn't trip until the temp in the house was below freezing - even
though it was set for 50 degrees.
Stop by your local library and check it out. I'd say that I'll try to
remember to bring in my copy and enter more specifics but I know me
better than that - I'll constantly forget and frustrate myself and
annoy you.
|
296.176 | Haven't seen the CR yet, but Duofone makes (made?) such a unit | UHUH::TALCOTT | | Tue Nov 28 1995 08:09 | 8 |
| We have one at the vet's. Does all sorts of stuff - according to the box it came
in, it can watch for high/low temps, be tied in to fire/burglar/smokes alarms,
and will dial up to 4 phone numbers and deliver a pre-recorded message. You can
also call it up and listen to whatever's going on in the area within its
"earshot." Don't know how well it works - I've worked there five years and it's
never been plugged in.
Trace
|
296.139 | security questions | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:54 | 6 |
| Where is the DCS 3000 available?
Anyone know if Eaglestar is only in New England?
thanks,
Mike
|
296.140 | | STAR::BALLISON | | Fri Dec 15 1995 12:24 | 11 |
| I just got one from Home Automation Systems Inc... 1-800-smarthome
$249 for a DCS 3000 + 0ne keypad. $86 each for more keypads, $13 for a
power supply and $25 for battery backup. They have all the other
goodies too. You get an extra 20% off if you manage to convince them
that you're a contractor.
FWIW, this is a real nice unit. I installed one in my last house
and it worked perfectly. And the keypad is real nice looking too.
Brian
|
296.217 | Wire size for home alarm | ASABET::SOTTILE | Get on Your Bikes and Ride | Mon Dec 16 1996 16:58 | 6 |
296.218 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Dec 16 1996 17:06 | 6 |
296.219 | Prewire | ASABET::SOTTILE | Get on Your Bikes and Ride | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:41 | 15 |
296.220 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:56 | 13 |
296.221 | The wonders of Mass. | NETCAD::HILLER | | Tue Dec 17 1996 11:29 | 9 |
296.222 | | ASABET::SOTTILE | Get on Your Bikes and Ride | Tue Dec 17 1996 12:04 | 4 |
296.223 | I don't believe it matters... | NETCAD::HILLER | | Tue Dec 17 1996 12:13 | 10 |
296.224 | got to love that state | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Tue Dec 17 1996 12:22 | 6 |
296.225 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Dec 18 1996 09:00 | 17 |
296.226 | Give the inspector a call.. | NETCAD::HILLER | | Wed Dec 18 1996 14:12 | 11 |
296.227 | false alarms?? | PERFOM::MATTHES | | Wed Dec 18 1996 14:32 | 7 |
296.228 | you'll disconnect it when they charge you $50 per | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Wed Dec 18 1996 18:25 | 9 |
296.229 | proactive ? | PERFOM::MATTHES | | Thu Dec 19 1996 08:49 | 7 |
296.230 | Sentry Security of Worcester,MA | FABSIX::A_LAMY | | Sat Feb 15 1997 00:30 | 17 |
| Any one hear of Sentry Home Security out of Worcester ??? We have
a sales consultant coming out to the house on the 24th of Feb to
evaluate our needs. It seems we won a complete home security system
from them at a home show and they are coming to explain their system
and determine what needs to be hooked up. From what they told me on
the phone I won a system valued at $700 which will cover up to
XXXX sq feet of home(I forgot what square footage she told me on the
phone but it was well over what my small split level covers). I kept
asking her what the catch was,meaning what it would cost me and she
said only the monthly service/monitoring charge of around $25/month
No cost for the system or installation. I only had to commit to them
providing their monitor service for one year. Any feedback on this
company or their products,reliabilty of service,etc...would be truly
appreciated,before the 24th of this month so I can have a bit more
knowledge when the sales rep comes over......
thanks...
al
|
296.231 | Beware Alarm Systems Salesmen......... | STAR::BALLISON | | Mon Feb 17 1997 10:34 | 11 |
| My guess is that you and 100's of others "won". These companies
usually install very low end alarm systems (maybe 2 door sensors and
one motion detector), and then make big $$$ on the monitoring
contracts. I'd call several other companies and compare the "deals" if
you're really serious about an alarm system. Be ready for some pretty
high pressure sales people too. They'll pull every scare tatic in the
book on you and list all the break-ins in your neighborhood to try to
get you to buy their system.
Brian
|
296.232 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Mon Feb 17 1997 11:19 | 17 |
| I've had good luck with A-Z Vacuum and Security in Worcester...
Their monitoring contracts are about half the cost you are quoting,
also...
They have a store on Pleasant St in Worcester....
You need to get a couple of quotes on a complete system, and
monitoring. The costs vary a lot. There is a large variety in options,
also. The better motion detectors can be set up to ignore <20 lb pets,
etc, but they cost a little more. DIY is always an option, the parts
are pretty cheap, but it is a real pain to install these in an existing
house.
Expect a hard sell from any sales rep who comes to your house....
Chris
|
296.233 | | HYDRA::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, SPE MRO | Mon Feb 17 1997 12:11 | 10 |
| I pay $180/yr. for monitoring a system for which I own the components
and paid for their installation. It's a custom-built house and I'm
sure that mine is more expensive than many. You pay extra for every
nicety, and there are a lot of them to choose.
1. Decide if you want to rent or buy the equipment.
2. Decide how much protection you need. Perimeter/Fire/other
3. Pick the extra options you want. (Hey, some of them are nice!)
Mark
|
296.234 | | POWDML::HAMILTON_K | | Mon Feb 17 1997 14:00 | 15 |
| re. 230
My daughter won the same system. They told her over the phone some of
the drawbacks to the system and she decided not to have them come.
1. No one can be at the house when the system is on; not just people,
but critters, too.
2. You can't leave windows open in the good weather as the curtains
blowing might set off the alarm.
re. last: she never mentioned them saying anything about a fire alarm.
I'll have to give her a call.
|
296.235 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Mon Feb 17 1997 14:47 | 14 |
| A good monitored system will have options for fire, over and under
temp, water in the basement, etc. The key is getting enough zones up
front for all the sensors - an 8 zone system is not unreasonable in a
medium/large house, as each motion sensor ends up on its own zone, as
do the above sensors.
Also, if set up with the proper system, the outside doors can be armed
without arming the interior motion sensors, for night security...
The monitoring costs the same regardless... the sensors just add to the
utility (and the up-front cost!).
CHRIS
|
296.236 | I won another one :;) | FABSIX::A_LAMY | | Tue Feb 18 1997 22:37 | 10 |
| I had a feeling that others would "win" a system like me,thats why I
was so skeptical upon recieving the congratulatory phone call. Also,
the day after I posted my note,I go home and get the mail and low and
behold,don't I win another security system from the other company that
was there, ADT. Only they want a 3 year commit to monitor. If I could
just be so lucky with megabucks. Anyway, I'll let the guy come over and
listen to his speel,but the wife and I have decided to hold off for
now. When we're ready we'll BUY one that suits our needs and have it
installed on our terms.
|
296.237 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Feb 19 1997 10:44 | 7 |
|
You might want to consider SONITROL. They are a base-monitored
system that works WITH your household. You don't have to live
AROUND it!!!
justme....jacqui
|