T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
143.1 | books... | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Wed Jun 03 1992 08:28 | 12 |
|
Try a book called "How to get Pregnant" by Dr. Silber...Should be able
to find it at any major bookstore (US). Its very informative, and
should give you the information you are looking for.
I had another book I liked even more, (its on loan), I think it was
called "Fertility and You" or "Your Fertility"....It was easy reading,
in also very down to earth. (soft cover,tan w/flowers ?)....
Good Luck,
Chris
|
143.2 | | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Wed Jun 03 1992 10:29 | 10 |
|
I went out and bought a book called Pregnancy and child birth. I don't
have the authors name on hand. But it's got a picture on the cover of a
mom, dad and newborn baby. I foundit to be like a bible for me when I
was trying to conceive and when I got pregnant. Every question you need
to have an answer to is in htis book. I also found it alot easier to
read all this in a book instead of asking mega questions to my friends.
And the books are really informative.
Sandy
|
143.3 | One suggested plan... | WONDER::MAKRIANIS | Patty | Wed Jun 03 1992 11:46 | 21 |
|
I forget which volume of Parenting had it, but there was a note on this
subject. I remember thinking "the more you try the better your chances
are". I was wrong. Someone in that flow of notes explained a pattern to
follow that worked for me the first month I tried it for both my first
pregnancy (a miscarriage) and for my 1 year old daughter Anna. It
basically went like this:
If your cycle is regular your ovulate around the 14th day
of the cycle, start counting from the first day of your period.
It takes the males sperm 36 hours to rejuvenate to "full strength"
so make love every other day starting somewhere around day 9 or 10
of your cycle and continuing on to day 17 or 18 at least.
I followed this pattern from about day 8 to day 20 and as I
said got pregnant on the first try, twice. Now this may not work
for everyone, but it doesn't hurt to give it a try.
Good Luck. Pregnancy and childbirth are truely wonderful experiences.
Patty
|
143.4 | Works for me ! | SSGV01::ANDERSEN | | Wed Jun 03 1992 11:57 | 9 |
|
.3 is exactly what we did and conceived on the third try. That method
was told to us by a doctor.
One other point was made to us and I'll pass it along for what it's
worth. We were told to "prime the pump" if you will, meaning that
before you start trying to conceive each cycle make sure the sperm
hasn't been waiting around since the last try or for any length of
time. Simply put, use fresh sperm.
|
143.5 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 03 1992 12:18 | 13 |
| re .3:
Actually, ovulation usually occurs abotu 14 days *before* menstruation, so
you should estimate when your next period is due.
re .4:
I think your information on "old sperm" is incorrect. For semen analysis,
there's no upper limit, but they do prefer at least 48 hours since last
ejaculation. The general advice, sex every second day, is correct.
One more piece of general advice: no hot baths (hot tubs, jacuzzis, etc)
for the man, and none for the woman from ovulation until menstruation.
|
143.6 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Wed Jun 03 1992 12:29 | 17 |
|
We also did what was described in .3 - except we decided to try every day.
Elise was a first try baby, and the one I'm carrying is a second try. It
works. Also worked for my sister-in-law.
Other little tid-bits that help: the man should avoid hot showers, hot tubs,
and jockey shorts for a month before (and for the duration), as these will all
slow sperm production and/or kill some sperm from the heat.
Also, the woman should relax in a prone position for a while (15-20 minutes).
Gravity will then help the sperm on their travels.
One more thing that *I* think helps, but this is only an opinion: Once you've
figured out *when* to have sex, forget about babies and enjoy yourself. Your
brain can't make the baby, so get out of the way and let your body take over.
|
143.7 | | SSGV01::ANDERSEN | | Wed Jun 03 1992 13:25 | 22 |
| >re .3:
>Actually, ovulation usually occurs abotu 14 days *before* menstruation, so
>you should estimate when your next period is due.
Isn't it typically a 28 day cycle, given that, 14 days before is 14 days
after the last.
>re .4:
>I think your information on "old sperm" is incorrect. For semen analysis,
>there's no upper limit, but they do prefer at least 48 hours since last
>ejaculation. The general advice, sex every second day, is correct.
I won't argue that my information may be incorrect, however, semen for
analysis is not the same as semen for procreation. Why do you suppose they
would like fresh (i.e. within 2 days) semen.
Given what you have said, I think I would opt for using the fresh stuff.
again fwiw
|
143.8 | | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Wed Jun 03 1992 13:46 | 14 |
|
I too agree with the ideas of 1) every other day starting around day
9-10, 2) woman should crunch up to the fetal position, or the like and
not get right out of bed immediatly after, 3) boxer shorts
It took us 6 months, but it worked. The book I mentioned earlier,
"Fertility and You" or "Your fertility" was really concentrated about
the "mucas" factor... and I have to admit, that once you know what to
look for, you really can figure it out. I really noticed this the month
I got pregnant.
Good Luck
Chris
|
143.9 | counting nit | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Wed Jun 03 1992 14:39 | 16 |
| .5> Actually, ovulation usually occurs abotu 14 days *before* menstruation, so
> you should estimate when your next period is due.
.7> Isn't it typically a 28 day cycle, given that, 14 days before is 14 days
> after the last.
It is, typically, a 28 day cycle, and in that case it wouldn't matter
whether you counted ahead 14 days or back 14 days from the next
expected period. But it does make a difference if the woman's cycle is
typically 26 days; in that case, counting forward 14 days would miss
ovulation by 2 days. (It's the ovulation that "causes" the period 14
days later, not the other way around.) So if that (26-day) woman were
determined to count forward instead of back, she should count *12* days
forward.
Leslie
|
143.10 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 03 1992 14:56 | 8 |
| The *average* may be 28 days, but some women have longer or shorter regular
periods.
The body produces sperm continuously. There's a tradeoff between number
of sperm available and the amount of time they survive in the woman's body.
That's the reason for the every-other-day advice. More time between
ejaculations would produce more sperm per ejaculation, but every-other-day
gives more shots per cycle.
|
143.11 | kits | PCOJCT::LOCOVARE | | Wed Jun 03 1992 17:50 | 20 |
|
Try the ovulation predictor kits - it worked perfectly
for me and my girlfriend just did it and was successful
2nd try.
Re. Ovulation cycle; I have a 28 day cycle which all the
charts say day 14 but with the kits I found I was day 9/10.
I would have been trying the wrong time.
The cycles are not connected either because you can have
a 28 day cycle but each month you could ovulate a
different time and this is what makes it harder for some.
If you use a kit try two and start a little earlier than
they say. My girlfriend had no results with her first kit
and then tried a few days earlier with the 2nd and found
she was earlier than the "typical chart" for her cycle.
Good luck
|
143.12 | 14 days - not everyone | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Thu Jun 04 1992 09:09 | 13 |
| Some women, including yours truly, have PMS which affects their cycle.
Now before you say, whooa girl, PMS is just a polite euphemism for some
terms I can't publicly write, you should know that it is a documented
syndrome with several typical symptoms.
One characteristic of PMS is that the woman ovulates earlier than the
average, say about 7-10 days after onset of menstruation. You can
confirm this by taking your temperature every morning before rising,
and keeping a record. At ovulation, your temperature will drop.
The planning details previously described still apply, but earlier.
L
|
143.13 | 9-10 | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Thu Jun 04 1992 09:28 | 7 |
|
I have to agree with the last couple...I also found that I ovulated
around day 9-10 of my cycle... Whether it has anything to do with
having PMS, which I do, I don't know.
Chris
|
143.14 | re: .12 | BSLOPE::BOURQUARD | Deb | Thu Jun 04 1992 10:55 | 9 |
| > At ovulation, your temperature will drop.
Are you sure? I was under the impression that your temperature spiked just
after ovulation. Many women have mentioned that their temp. "dips" (0.1 to 0.3)
degrees the day before their temperature spike. Is that what you meant?
BTW, although my doctor commented on how "beautiful" my temp charts were
(indicating that I did indeed ovulate), I showed neither the dip nor the spike
-- just a gradual climb.
|
143.15 | | GOOEY::ROLLMAN | | Thu Jun 04 1992 11:28 | 17 |
|
The PMS connection has me interested. PMS can get worse as a woman ages. I
have observed this in me.
So, would that mean that a woman ovulates earlier as she ages, which would then
mean that her cycle would shorten? My cycle has shortened as I age - not
drastically, it changed from 29 days to 26 days in the last 10 years, and that
moves the likely date of ovulation from about 14.5 days to 13 days.
Earlier replies indicate that women who have PMS ovulate even earlier than
that. Am I describing a different phenomina?
And BTW, I am in total agreement that PMS exists, is medically describable, and
treatment to reduce symptoms exists and can work.
Pat
|
143.16 | If periods shorten, ovulation must be sooner. | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Thu Jun 04 1992 17:32 | 11 |
| My cycle is indeed shortening. I assume my ovulation is sooner too.
If I try to get pregnant again, I will again use the basal body
temperature method (before rising in the am) and keep a chart. It's a
fairly reliable indicator. I would not rely on it for faultless
prevention of conception, but it is a help in getting pregnant.
L
(I have PMS - contrary to popular notions I don't suffer more than the
average woman, as far as I can tell. But there are some subtle
differences.)
|
143.17 | feeling ovulation | COMET::STEWARTA | | Fri Jun 05 1992 08:00 | 3 |
| Every month at the same time my pelvis is tender(sore) and my doctor
says its ovulaton, but I am still having a problem getting pregnant
is there any other women who experience this?
|
143.19 | You got it... | WONDER::MAKRIANIS | Patty | Wed Jun 10 1992 16:22 | 9 |
|
You sound all set with the counting. The way you've stated it you would
start trying on day 7 of your cycle. You could even hold off and start
on Monday or Tuesday (day 8 or 9). On the subject of your husband's
pants, I don't know what to say. My husband wears cotton briefs and we
had no problems, but then again he wears mostly Dockers for pant which
tend not to be tight fitting.
Patty
|
143.20 | swimming anyone? | STUDIO::POIRIER | | Wed Jun 10 1992 16:40 | 9 |
| The discussion of men's shorts reminded me of how I used to make Bob
jump in our pool before going to bed at night regardless of the weather
or the water temperature! Somewhere I read that hot baths (his former
nighttime routine) kill sperm! We were desparate so we tried a lot of
those antidotes!
One of them worked;^)
beth
|
143.21 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 10 1992 17:51 | 7 |
| re .20:
Since it takes 2-3 months for sperm to develop, jumping in the pool wouldn't
help. Keeping the testicles cool over the long term means no hot baths or
heated car seats, and boxer shorts instead of briefs. Believe it or not,
I've heard of some kind of mechanical scrotum-cooling device, but I can't
imagine what it's like.
|
143.22 | | LITRCY::KELTZ | You can't push a rope | Wed Jun 10 1992 18:59 | 6 |
| re: .21
I saw it on one of those daytime talk shows a while back. It's a
water-cooled device that sorta looks like an athletic support. It
was designed by a patient who had infertility problems due to his
scrotum being too hot. He's an engineer, of course.
|
143.23 | Zinc | SAHQ::HERNDON | Kristen, SOR, 385-2683 | Thu Jun 11 1992 09:49 | 21 |
| One thing that does make men more viral and is good for
women to take is 50 mg of Zinc.
Aids in keeping the uterus attached and increases sperm
count in men....My husband and I take it.
When we decided to get pregnant, we figured it would take 3-6 months.
I had been taking my temperature for 3 months so I knew about
when I ovulated. We tried one time 2 days before I was supposed
to ovulate and never tried again (my hubby went out of town
right after that). My baby was born 9 months later. We wanted
a boy so bad and when people said you just about have to be
ovulating right at *that* time, we figured it was a girl...Nope!
This is no claim that Zinc was the reason I conceived so quickly....
but it didn't hurt. I know fertility books recommend Zinc as well.
So hang in there. I really felt better knowing when I ovulated
but I never expected it to happen so quickly!
Kristen
|
143.24 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Jun 11 1992 11:13 | 14 |
| > One thing that does make men more viral and is good for
> women to take is 50 mg of Zinc.
I don't think men want to be viral. If you're talking about virility,
any connection to zinc is purely in the minds of vitamin manufacturers.
There have been some studies of zinc's effects on sperm quality. In one
study of men who had low levels of zinc in their semen, a zinc supplement
improved sperm quality. Other studies found no effect, or even a negative
effect. The doctor whose study indicated a positive correlation has not
had much success in applying zinc therapy to men with sperm quality problems.
Of course, the doses of zinc in over-the-counter supplements can't do much
harm, so it's probably OK to take them.
|
143.25 | ovulation and pelvic pain | BLUMON::BOLGATZ | | Fri Jun 19 1992 16:38 | 11 |
| > .17 Tenderness in the pelvic region during ovulation
This is true, but not all women experience it. The explanation given to me by
my Dr.was that there is a little bit of bleeding when the egg leaves the ovary
wall. This blood, which is now loose in your pelvic region, is an irritant.
You may notice that the pain becomes more pronounced when urinating. In this
case, the blood has probably seeped around the bladder (good ole gravity).
(This pain is not to be confused with a bladder infection, which is much
different!).
When you have something that obvious as a signal, the decision is yours....
|
143.26 | after first pregnancy | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Sun Jun 21 1992 17:30 | 15 |
| After my first pregnancy I too experienced pain in the middle of my
cycle. I suspected that I was ovulating, and the doctor confirmed it.
This of course was wonderful. I wanted to get pregnant as soon as
possible after we lost Daniel, so having nature help was great.
After the six months of recovery (recommended by doctor) was up,
the first time I felt the pain (this time on the 12 day, not the
14th) I called hubby from work and said
"Dear, the bomb bay doors are open!"
Suffice to say 9 months later we have our Charlotte.
I also felt a lot of pain after BOTH conceptions (my husband always
says that the ovaries are shutting down and going on vacation).for
about a day or two.
Monica
|
143.27 | TRY AGAIN | GRANPA::TBITTINGER | Murphy's mom | Tue Jun 30 1992 12:51 | 10 |
| I am trying to get pregnant. I have not tried the temperture method
yet because this is our first month trying. I seem to get some
tenderess around day 12 til day 14. Well on day 12 the bomb bay doors
opened (as Monica put it). It is day 14 and I still have the same
pain. Last nite it hurt pretty bad to where I couldn't get comfortable
enough to sleep. So I ended up sleeping on my stomach (which I never
do because I have a bad back). So could I be pregnant or should we
keep trying?
Tricia :)
|
143.28 | FWIW... | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:00 | 4 |
| I get cramps during the ovulation period versus the menstrual period.
-sandy
|
143.29 | it hurts! | AKOCOA::TRIPP | | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:04 | 10 |
| At the point I ovulated for AJ I really was considering that I had
appendicitis. I could barely stand upright, and we were walking some
land with the potential to buy and build. I finally had to go back and
wait in the car. That's why I'm so sure of when I conceived AJ.
I had been hospitalized a couple years before to rule out appendictis,
it turned out to be a real painful ovulation. That's how bad the pain
really can be!
Lyn
|
143.30 | Try again, why not! | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Tue Jun 30 1992 13:40 | 16 |
|
I would say to keep trying...it couldn't hurt. If by chance the
discomfort you were feeling on day 12 was the egg starting to break
through the ovary, then the major pain you described from last night
could be the egg DID actually break through...which would mean it is
there READY AND WAITING right now. And if it is, and the sperm from the
other day are dead (I forget how long they live), then fresh sperm
today would only enhance the possibilities.
My husband and I "tried" every other day during the middle of my cycle.
Good Luck! But don't be disappointed if it doesn't happen the first
month. It took us 6 months. Its different for everyone.
Chris
|
143.31 | Re. .27 | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Wed Jul 01 1992 04:17 | 9 |
| >> do because I have a bad back). So could I be pregnant or should we
>> keep trying?
>>
>> Tricia :)
Trying is half the fun ;-)
ccb
|
143.32 | ;-) | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Wed Jul 01 1992 08:49 | 9 |
|
Yea...my husband says he will remember those months of "trying"
with fond memories!
;-)
Chris
|
143.33 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:33 | 3 |
| Contrary to what the last couple of replies have implied, trying to get
pregnant does not improve your sex life. Having sex on a schedule detracts
from the pleasure, and in some cases "performance anxiety" causes impotence.
|
143.34 | | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Wed Jul 01 1992 11:56 | 7 |
|
Re: last
I think each couples sex-life is different, and you are wrong to make
such a general statement.
|
143.36 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 01 1992 14:26 | 12 |
| re .34:
Suppose neither partner feels like sex, but the calendar requires it.
Suppose both *do* feel like it, but they've been told to wait two days
since the last time? I'm not claiming that fertility problems always have
a negative effect on a couple's sex life, but it's certainly very common.
re .35:
You're treading on delicate territory. People with fertility problems
get very upset when you say it's just due to stress. It's really the
other way around -- fertility problems cause stress.
|
143.38 | hey...but what do I know | EOS::ARMSTRONG | | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:14 | 23 |
| > I'm talking about the people I know that gave up then got
> pregnant. I think their problems were due to stress.
As the previous reply suggested, you might want to be a little
careful here. This is probably true for alot of areas where
you think you know best but someone else's 'problems' are.
We tried for many years to get pregnant. We did just about every
medical procedure around. Sure....there was a lot of stress in
our lives. But I dont think it was causing us not to get pregnant.
We adopted, continued working on fertility, and adopted again.
and we were lucky enough to be able to adopt another little girl
a year later. Turned out at the time of our 3rd adoption, my
wife was about a couple weeks pregnant, which we didn't realize for
another month. Quite a shock!
I think that our bodies change over time and slight misalignments
can keep you from becoming pregnant. With age and change, you may
pass through periods when everything lines up. and BINGO....surprise!
This is sensitive stuff.....tread with care.
bob
|
143.39 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Wed Jul 01 1992 16:57 | 11 |
| I wholeheartedly agree that things change with time. I have a friend
who decided to adopt after 5 miscarriages. They took "possession" of
their beautiful little boy early one December - he was 5 days old. Less
than a month later she discovered she was pregnant. She was very
concerned about the pregnancy, but she now has two beautiful little
boys to show off - less than a year apart (but she never complained
about the stresses of two little ones - not even once!)
-sandy
|
143.40 | | HYEND::C_DENOPOULOS | WHO.....MADE.....YOU!!! | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:28 | 6 |
|
Well, I deleted those two notes even though I see nothing wrong with
them.
Bye Bye everyone, it's been fun.
Chris D.
|
143.41 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:45 | 2 |
| Let's not get into a rash of adopted-then-got-pregnant stories. It happens,
but most people who adopt because of infertility don't get pregnant.
|
143.42 | happens all the time | EOS::ARMSTRONG | | Thu Jul 02 1992 10:34 | 9 |
| >Let's not get into a rash of adopted-then-got-pregnant stories. It happens,
>but most people who adopt because of infertility don't get pregnant.
Resolve's statistics say it occurs about 5% of the time....about 5% of
those who adopt due to infertility later concieve.
but urban legands abound....everyone knows someone who has a friend who
knows someone who this happened to!
bob
|
143.43 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | GHWB-Anywhere But America Tour 92 | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:21 | 18 |
| You're absolutely right. That's because they only count the cases that are
proven to have problems.
RE: Urban legends. I've got 2 that I know to be true. My father and his first
wife were told they could not have children. I was adopted. A year later my
brother was born. My wife and I were told in 1978 that we couldn't have kids.
We decided we'ld be good yuppies and buy a house and forget about having kids.
My wive was told she was pregnant the day we passed papers. Now I have 3 kids.
A friend in similar circumstances told me what the fertility specialist advised
them to do.
"First take a long vacation, if that doesn't work make a major
acquisition (IE House), if that fails adopt. If you get pregnant
wonderful, if not you've had a good time and you still have a
child to love."
|
143.44 | WHEN? | GRANPA::TBITTINGER | Murphy's mom | Wed Jul 08 1992 11:40 | 6 |
| Okay so when do you actually start counting - from the first day of
your period or the last day of you period? I've been counting 12 days
from the end of my period. That is also when I get my cramping.
Thanks for the info.
Tricia
|
143.45 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jul 08 1992 12:31 | 1 |
| From the first day.
|
143.46 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Wed Jul 08 1992 14:10 | 11 |
| Well, for me it's 16 days. I have typically a 34 day cycle and can
easily tell when I ovulate. (Unless I am guessing wrong here.) I have a
very noticeable discharge and cramping 16-17 days after the first day.
I have been charting this for over a year and for about one month out
of the year I will have a 40+ day cycle. Almost like I have to get
back on track with the lunar phases or something 8^)
So - how to I know when it's time to try for that girl? 8^)
-sandy
|
143.47 | Day 14 | EMDS::CUNNINGHAM | | Thu Jul 09 1992 08:35 | 11 |
|
Off the top of my head (from my previous reading) I would say to try
about day 14. That should give the sperm enough time to get up to
the ovary to wait, and where the female sperm are stronger than the
males, they will be there ready & waiting for the egg to pop out on day 16.
This could be off, I was doing my main reading at the time on
concieving a boy, but I think its close.
Chris
|
143.48 | Basenoter checking in | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Wed Jul 29 1992 15:04 | 11 |
|
The following is an anonymous reply from the basenoter.
Let me be the first to say "CONGRATULATIONS!"
Carol Stolicny, PARENTING co-mod
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This is just a quick note to say THANKS A LOT for your help.
I tried the method recommended in .3 and it worked the first month
we tried !! Now if everything goes OK, I should give birth in March.
The information was really helpful, I think this basic information
should be discussed in more Women's magazines and books.
|
143.49 | FIRST TRY??!! | GRANPA::TBITTINGER | Murphy's mom | Thu Jul 30 1992 11:46 | 4 |
| It worked on the first try?? Wow!! I am trying too - so we will see
if it works for me this month!
Tricia :)
|
143.50 | test kits | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:27 | 8 |
|
Suggestions for Ovulation kits.
I am intested in finding out what is best test kit for
finding out if you are ovulating or not..
Suggestions?
|
143.51 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:51 | 2 |
| Do you mean "ovulating or not" or "when you're ovulating?" If you have reason
to believe you're not ovulating, I don't think any home test will tell you.
|
143.52 | | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:04 | 9 |
|
I thought there were some test kits out there that would
tell you the best time to get pregnant..
I thought they measured a hormone that told you that you
were ovulating.
|
143.53 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:21 | 14 |
|
Yes there are, I think that someone was picking up on a nit.
I have personally never used one of the kits (got pregnant before I
could and ended up giving it away) but I'll be there are lots of people
in this notes file who could tell you their experiences.
I've always thought about using one of those kits to figure out
exactly when I do ovulate (just kind of for my information). Many women
say that they can feel something when they ovulate or that they feel
different, I've never really noticed anything, but then if I knew that
that was the time, perhaps I would look harder for symptoms.
Wendy
|
143.54 | pick a kit that sounds easy to use | TAMARA::SORN | songs and seeds | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:08 | 27 |
| Any of the ovulation kits work fine. They are expensive; the basic
kit is about $15-20+ for five days and you'll probably need it for
longer than that. There are some "filler" kits that have additional
days, I guess 3-5 more. They are usually $10-15 and are the SAME kit
as the regular one. So you could just buy the filler kit...check the
prices and see if they are already figured out this and upped the
cost.
If you are using the kit for the first time, start the testing around
day 10-11 (10 days after your period BEGINS), unless you have a strong
idea of when you ovulate. Keep testing each day until you see by
the results that you have ovulated, OR until your period starts.
This will be the expensive month! If, when you begin testing, your
results show that you have already ovulated, stop testing. As soon
as you ovulate, you don't need to use the test.
Some people ovulate as late as day 18-20, some as early as day 9. To
get a good idea of the time you ovulate, use the test for two or three
months. If you ovulate around the same time, then that is your
ovulation time and you can plan on that time. If you don't get any
success from the test, you should A. try testing earlier in your cycle,
B. see your doctor.
Good luck!
Cyn
|
143.55 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | light upon the figured leaf | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:32 | 9 |
| Just curious. A basal-body-temperature thermometer is a small one-time
expense, and, for most people, will probably give just as good results.
If not, add in the cervical mucus methods from Natural Family Planning.
High tech is wonderful, and convenient, I suppose; but I would think
that for the great majority of couples, it is also a significant and
totally unnecessary expense.
-Neil
|
143.56 | BBT is not the best way for everyone | MEMIT::GIUNTA | | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:09 | 19 |
| Re .55
Actually, there are many cases where a basal body temperature will not tell a
woman when she is ovulating, as there are many women who do not have the
text-book drop_then_rise associated with ovulating. And some women have it
over several days, so it's not really noticeable til your finished ovulating,
and then it's too late to get pregnant. And adding in the cervical mucus may
or may not help, depending on the woman. It is not uncommon for the mucus
to not change, or for the change to be slight. I agree that if a woman has
the text-book bodily changes during ovulation, then the BBT is sufficient,
and there may be no need for the ovulation kits. But there are many instances
where they are warranted. In fact, I had used the BBT for several years while
trying to get pregnant, and my doctor still insisted I use the ovulation
predictor to schedule appointments for artificial inseminations.
I think some women may also feel more comfortable using the kits rather than
the BBT as the BBT may take a few months to get used to, and it may seem
a faster way to get pregnant if the kits were used from the start of trying
to conceive.
|
143.57 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:16 | 14 |
|
And using the BBT method assumes that your body's temperature is
not being elevated by an unrelated infection (somewhere in your body),
that you haven't gotten up during the night (which raises your
temperature) or that you haven't taken any kid of medication, like
Tylenol or Aspirin (which would decrease the normal body temperature).
Sure it's cheaper to take you temp. and watch your mucus (which may
also be affected by the amount of water you drink) but if one is really
concerned about *getting* pregnant and pinpointing the time of
ovulation, sometimes, you just can't beat high tech.
Wendy
|
143.58 | I have used many | JULIET::TOWERS_MI | | Fri Aug 28 1992 21:07 | 32 |
| Having spent many $ on a number of different plans recommended by
different doctors, here is what I find.
First time I used this expensive ($49) test but it was 7 days and
worked fine (that is I got pregnant right away. The color changes were
gradual so you could see some blue before it got dark blue showing you
were getting ready to ovulate.
Then I tried the store bought ones. Each required mixing and waiting.
My present doctor recommends Clear Plan Easy as it requires only one
step, to urinate on the stick for 5 seconds. To keep the urine from
getting in the results area I just put my thumb over it before
urinating. This seems to be an easy method and also has some change in
color before actually turning dark blue. It also has a test area that
should turn blue and show you you have done the test right. If the
result area is darker blue, you are getting ready to ovulate. So far
no results but we'll see.
I find this easier for me versus temperatures etc as I am very
irregular. I have found I ovulate anywhere from day 17 to day 25. I
also have irregular periods. But I have noticed that by using these
kits, I now know that I do get a pain in my lower left side one month
and a lighter pain in my right side the next. I also can tell how
different my mucos gets so I find I do not have to use as many kits, I
just wait for the mucos to get thicker before testing and the past two
months, that has been about 3 or 4 days before the surge.
Average cost out here in Calif for these tests is about $25 - $29. If
you have a discount drug store you can save about $3.
Michelle
|
143.59 | ovulation kits are great! | SOJU::PEABODY | | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:44 | 20 |
|
Basal body thermometers are not cheap ($8-10) and are not necessarily a
one-time expense. I took my temperature for over a year and broke
several thermometers while trying to shake them down while still half
asleep. This was a very discouraging method for me, and it appeared
that I was ovulating at about day 13 or 14.
After lots of fertility testing and just before we attempted the
GIFT program, the docter suggested we try the Ovustick kit. This kit
had to be obtained from the pharmacist, but a prescription was not
required. It cost about $45 for a 10 day test kit, but it was worth
it! I used 5 days during the first month, but the timing was bad.
However, it showed me that I was ovulating around day 10 and not 14.
The second month, well Shannon turns 3 next week, so it was very
successfull!
I would recommend an ovulation kit to anyone who wants to conceive
right away!
|
143.60 | | CSLALL::LMURPHY | | Wed Sep 16 1992 16:34 | 7 |
| i just got this month's "CHILD" magazine, in it they say chances of
conceiving are greatly increased if you try to conceive between
oct and march. it also said to take a cough syrup containing
guafenin (sp?) 4 days prior to conceiving to thin the cervical mucous
and let the sperm get thru easier
|
143.61 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Sep 16 1992 16:44 | 16 |
| re .60:
> i just got this month's "CHILD" magazine, in it they say chances of
> conceiving are greatly increased if you try to conceive between
> oct and march.
Sounds fishy. If it were significantly easier to conceive then, birthdays
wouldn't be evenly distributed. Did they explain their claim?
> it also said to take a cough syrup containing
> guafenin (sp?) 4 days prior to conceiving to thin the cervical mucous
> and let the sperm get thru easier
I mentioned in the infertility note that a specialist mentioned that
Robitussin thins the cervical mucus. I believe its active ingredient
is glyceral guaiacolate.
|
143.62 | | SSGV01::ANDERSEN | She smiles with her eyes. | Wed Sep 16 1992 17:21 | 9 |
|
> i just got this month's "CHILD" magazine, in it they say chances of
> conceiving are greatly increased if you try to conceive between
> oct and march.
>>Sounds fishy. If it were significantly easier to conceive then, birthdays
>>wouldn't be evenly distributed. Did they explain their claim?
How do you know they are ?
|
143.63 | Maybe they are? | TANNAY::BETTELS | Cheryl, Eur. Ext. Res. Prg., DTN 821-4022 | Thu Sep 17 1992 07:52 | 14 |
|
>> i just got this month's "CHILD" magazine, in it they say chances of
>> conceiving are greatly increased if you try to conceive between
>> oct and march.
>
>>>Sounds fishy. If it were significantly easier to conceive then, birthdays
>>>wouldn't be evenly distributed. Did they explain their claim?
>
> How do you know they are ?
Maybe they are, perhaps the situation is reversed in the southern hemisphere :-)
ccb
|
143.64 | Child article | CSLALL::LMURPHY | | Thu Sep 17 1992 09:45 | 25 |
| here's the article........CHILD - October 1992
"cold weather conception"
If your'e trying to get pregnant during the upcoming winter months,
the fertility gods may be with you. Check out these fascinating facts
about seasonal sex from New York City-based fertility expert Niels H.
Lauersen, M.D., Ph.D., co-author of Getting Pregnant:What Couples Need
to Know Right Now.
:Making love between October and March doubles your chance of
getting pregnant;the climate changes during these months have a
positive effect on the uterine environment and egg quality.
:Take cough medicine if you come down with a cold. Look for one
that contains the active ingredient guaifenesin, which thins the mucus
not only in your lungs but in your cervix, making it better able to
transport sperm. Take one or two teaspoons a day, beginning four days
prior to when you want to conceive.
:Don't try to conceive under an electric blanket; the low voltage
may adversely affect your fertility.
|
143.65 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Thu Sep 17 1992 09:46 | 14 |
|
Actually, it is very realted to the external climate.
Most conceptions take place when the outside temperature is lower
(theories are that the male's sperms are not as affected as they are in
warmer weather). The most difficult months to conceive in are the
"high" summer months with special emphasis on July.
Somehow we beat the odds and ended up conceiving in July (must have
been the air conidtioning). I'm looking forward to a less crowded
maternity ward. (Spencer was conceived over the winter holidays and was
born in Sept/Oct - the most common months for births).
Wendy
|
143.66 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Sep 17 1992 10:55 | 15 |
| re .62:
I don't know what the distribution of birthdays is, but I expect that someone
out there does. I didn't say that the information was wrong, just suspicious.
They seem to be claiming that twice as many births occur between July and
December than between January and June (assuming full-term pregnancies).
So, can anyone prove or disprove this?
Also, don't electric blankets operate at line voltages? I've never seen
a transformer on an electric blanket.
Heat does affect sperm, but there's a three month period for sperm production,
and outdoor temperature probably isn't so important in our climate-controlled
society. Sperm quality is more likely to be affected by hot tubs, heated
car seats, and tight underwear than by weather.
|
143.67 | what I remember | TLE::RANDALL | The Year of Hurricane Bonnie | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:49 | 22 |
| re: .66
No, birthdays are not evenly distributed in Europe and the US and
Canada -- I've never seen data for the rest of the world. And
this data is several years old.
There's a spike in births in March and April, apparently
reflecting the surge in weddings that takes place in June. The
rate drops off, then climbs steadily through the summer before it
drops off in October or thereabouts. I don't remember how big the
differences were -- they were statistically significant, but I
don't remember it being twice as many births. The fall peak is
higher than the March/April one.
This actually makes sense from the biological perspective -- it
means gestation takes place primarily in the low-activity winter
months, and birth takes place in the summer when it's warmer and
theoretically the baby's chances of surviving are better. Many
mammals follow a similar pattern. (Not that it makes the theory,
right, of course.)
--bonnie
|
143.68 | | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Thu Sep 17 1992 11:54 | 10 |
|
Another thing to consider is that in the warmer months (And I'm talking
the high months of summer) ah, certain activites are sometimes
curtailed as it's "just too damn hot".
Of course in the winter months the opposite occurs, "get over here and
warm my feet".;-)
Wendy
|
143.69 | TEMPERATURE METHOD - WORKED! | GRANPA::TBITTINGER | Murphy's mom | Thu Oct 08 1992 15:51 | 4 |
| Just wanted to let you know that the temperature method worked the
first time. Could believe it!! I am due April 24, 1993.
Thanks for all the information.
|
143.70 | for Donna | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Fri Oct 09 1992 14:12 | 18 |
| Dear Donna,
We tried casually for 3 months. I remember getting really upset after
just one month. I even got in a minor auto accident because I was so
distracted. I was terribly upset in synagogue on Rosh Hashanah when I
saw all the pregnant woman and babies. It didn't help that the Bible
passage was about Sarah's fertility problems and conceiving Isaac. I
couldn't stop crying and had to leave the building.
After another 3 months, this time using the temperature method, we got
lucky.
I can hardly imagine how upsetting it is to go for a whole year or
more.
My empathy is with you.
Laura
|
143.71 | Everything | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Mon Oct 12 1992 14:17 | 17 |
|
Thanks for the understanding - It just seems so hard
for people to understand sometimes that you can't get
pregnant -
Then they turn around and say it can't be your husband
all his brothers never had problems getting there wives
pregnant..
Well that only leaves one person doesn't it...
I told my husband I just don't want to think about it
any more - When we get pregnant - or if we don't we have
each other and we both are willing to adopt..
I am always saying there is a reason for everything -
|
143.72 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Oct 14 1992 12:39 | 5 |
| > Then they turn around and say it can't be your husband
> all his brothers never had problems getting there wives
> pregnant..
Right. And if your parents didn't have children, you probably won't either.
|
143.73 | Miracles do happen! | NEWOA::HILLARY | | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:07 | 14 |
| I've been reading through this topic and thought that I'd tell you all
that if you're trying for a baby without success - you should never
give up hoping because miracles really do happen sometimes.
My husband and I had been trying for a family since we were married, 14
years and I am now 18 weeks pregnant! We had one IVF attempt which
didn't work earlier this year and had finally decided to almost give up
on the idea of ever being parents. Maybe that's what did it but our
story should be inspiration to anyone who knows the stresses of trying
for year after year without any luck. The message is don't ever give
up!
Nicola
|
143.74 | MAD!!!! | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:46 | 24 |
|
Frustrated, I have a friend of mine who went to the
doctors today because she is know 14 days late. She usally
has her period on the 6th of the month.
They went to do a blood test - which they always have
trouble doing since they can't find her vains. (She usally
gets pricked up to 7 times in each visit).
This time they couldn't find one. So they had her
do a urion test - it came out negative.
After she settled down - she called the ob gyn and she
said that she was probably not pregnant.. even though she
has all the symptoms. She said come back after a week and
they will test again.
The ob gyn also said that it was probably due to stress, that
she missed her period, even though he whole life - in the worst
times she had never missed.
This whole thing made me so MAD!!!
|
143.75 | RESOLVE | ICS::ANDERSON_C | | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:44 | 5 |
| Does anyone have an address and/or phone number for RESOLVE?
...infertility support group?
thanks,
cynthia
|
143.76 | Note 21.83 | GRANPA::CSACRA | | Tue Oct 20 1992 12:28 | 6 |
| See note 21.83 - there is a Massachusetts number for RESOLVE listed
there. If you are not in MA, they may have a number for an information
office in your area.
Good luck
Cathryn
|
143.77 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Oct 21 1992 13:18 | 1 |
| See 21.122. RESOLVE's headquarters is in Somerville, MA.
|
143.78 | thank you! | ICS::ANDERSON_C | | Wed Oct 21 1992 18:20 | 1 |
| Thanks!! I'll give them a call.
|
143.79 | Need info on ovulation | JUPITR::MAHONEY | Just another tricky day | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:09 | 23 |
|
I have a question regarding ovulation and conceiving. Here's the scoop:
Wed. Nov 11th I did the ovulation predictor test. The color showed up
bright pink as it is supposed to be when you are surging. Well, the
instuctions say to have intercourse on that day because it is most
likely your fertile day. But about 9 hrs before taking the test we had
intercourse so, would there be a good chance of still conceiving just 1
day prior to ovulation? The books all say that, if you have sex 1 to 2
days prior to ovulation there is most likely enough sperm still
in the fallopian tubes at the time of ovulation for fertilization to
occur.
Now, if sperm can live up 72 hrs, (is this true?) and ovulation is
roughly 6 to 48 hrs then my chances would seem good, yes? I am due for
my period Nov. 25th, I have felt light cramping on and off for the last
3 days around lower abdomen. No other signs yet. We are trying for
number 2 and when I got pregnant last time I never really tried it just
happened. Can anyone give me any info on the above?
Oh I forgot, does implantaion occur between days 7 and 10 after
ovulation?
Thanks, Sandy
|
143.80 | timeline view of fertilization process? | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Sat Feb 06 1993 09:18 | 36 |
| The following is posted at the request of a member of the PARENTING notesfile
community who prefers to remain anonymous at this time.
Carol Stolicny, PARENTING co-mod
--------------------------------
Does anyone have a concise time-oriented view of the whole fertilization
process, from ovulation through implantation? I'm interested in something
structured like the following, but can't find a book with all the pieces of
the puzzle, so thought perhaps this audience could fill in the blanks (x's).
[Assuming you know when ovulation occurs - granted, a HUGE assumption...]
x Days before ovulation: Intercourse (/"fresh" sperm)
Day of **Ovulation**: Intercourse
x Days after ovulation: Intercourse every other day until x days after
5 4 3 2 1 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|
I I I I I I I
These are some questions I'm seeking to aswer as factually as possible:
o How long does it take to "regenerate" the man's supply of sperm? x (36?) hrs.
o How long do sperm generally live (once inside the woman)? x (36-60?) hrs.
o How long does it take for the sperm to travel to the waiting egg? x (1?) hr.
o How long does it take for the fertilized egg to travel to the uterus for
implantation? x hrs./days
Please note your source - i.e. from a book, a physician, own experience, etc.
THANKS in advance for this valuable information!
Sincerely,
Conceptionally_Confused (trying for #2 after being "lucky" with #1)
|
143.81 | | NODEX::STINSON | "Linda Saisi Stinson...DTN 296-5796" | Mon Feb 08 1993 08:46 | 9 |
| I don't remember where I learned these things, just picked them up
along the way, but it takes
3 days for the male to regain full sperm count
The ovum (egg) can live for 12 hours after it is released
Sperm can survive in the reproductive tract for 48 hours it takes 7-10 days for implantation to occur
I believe it only takes the sperm around an hour to reach
the egg. I don't know what they do if it isn't there, hang
around waiting I guess. :-)
Linda
|
143.82 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:27 | 7 |
| I suggest you read Sherman Silber's new book, "How to Get Pregnant with the
New Technology." He goes into great detail about how it all works.
It may take three days for the sperm supply to (more or less) fully
recover, but since the woman's fertility window is shorter, that should
only affect abstinence *before* she's fertile. Once she's fertile,
if you wait three days, you've missed the window.
|
143.83 | Pillow Talk. | MINNY::GOOD | | Tue May 18 1993 15:46 | 10 |
|
I've been told that it helps to place a pillow under your hips for 20
minutes after sex just to give the sperm a helping hand on its way to
the egg. It hasn't worked for me yet, but I haven't been trying for all
that long! It may be worth the try!
Good Luck!
jo.
|
143.84 | a different view | SUPER::WTHOMAS | | Tue May 18 1993 15:53 | 9 |
|
A friend of mine (no joke here) stood on her head for 15 minutes
after she had sex and both times she did it, she got pregnant. (but
then there was no history of difficult conception and so who knows if
this actually helped her or not).
Talk about acrobatics in the bedroom.
Wendy
|
143.85 | didn't have to | KAOFS::M_BARNEY | Formerly Ms.Fett | Tue May 18 1993 17:14 | 6 |
| I don't recall having to stand on my head, and we did it twice
on the first unprotected try......
But, if it works for you......
Monica
|
143.86 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | this space for rent | Tue May 18 1993 18:24 | 11 |
|
I read this really really gross story of a couple who couldn't
conceive, as the lady was infertile, or something. Well the husband
made a donation, and using a turkey baster the 'donation' was delivered
to the wifes sister, who stood on her head!
Yuccckkkkk! It must be true, it was in the newspaper 8-}
Simon
|
143.87 | | SSGV01::ANDERSEN | Figures lie and liars figure. | Wed May 19 1993 10:15 | 5 |
|
re: -1
They interviewed that lady on a radio show I was listening to. It's
true.
|
143.88 | "Gross"? | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Mon May 24 1993 20:11 | 9 |
| < <<< Note 143.86 by CSC32::S_MAUFE "this space for rent" >>>
Why is this so gross, Simon? Many of us in this file have used donated
sperm. Although I didn't go so far as standing on my head, I did have my
hips elevated. I didn't consider that any grosser than some ways some *other*
people have gotten sperm into them. :-)
Carol
|
143.89 | does it work? | ASIC::JPOIRIER | | Tue May 25 1993 09:22 | 6 |
| Is there really an advantage to having your hips elevated ?? Or is
just staying flat in bed (or wherever) just as good?
** if I really thought standing on my head would work, I'd do it **
|
143.90 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | this space for rent | Tue May 25 1993 11:53 | 11 |
|
Carol,
you're right and I apologise for my insensitivity. It was the
do-it-yourself technique, and using a turkey baster, and standing on
your head, that for me, was kinda yeuck!
Personally, I still prefer the 'other' method, and all the
practising involved therein 8-)
Simon
|
143.91 | | NEWPRT::SZAFIRSKI_LO | IVF...I'm Very Fertile! | Tue May 25 1993 13:22 | 10 |
| After Embryo Transfer (IVF) your bed is slanted at a pretty sharp
angle. You stay in this wonderful position for 4 hours and during
that time a pretty little nurse brings your lunch. It's usally
something that ends up all over your chest and chin...must be a gravity
type of trick.
...and then there is always trying to go to the bathroom when you feel
like your almost standing on your head....
..Lori
|
143.92 | | SWAM2::MASSEY_VI | It's all in the cue | Thu Jun 03 1993 13:23 | 7 |
| What has worked for me is getting married. My first was concieved on
my honeymoon. I was remarried on the 24th of April and am now pregnant
again.
Ps. I was on the `Pill' both times. Should have been a hint I guess.
Virginia
|
143.93 | Turkey Baster | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Jun 08 1993 12:39 | 5 |
| Sometimes people don't have the option of the natural method. The
turkey baster idea sounds as good a method as any artificial method
I have heard of. Hey, you do what works, right?
Jeff
|
143.94 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | hate is STILL not a family value | Fri Jun 25 1993 13:54 | 4 |
| I gather that the elevation is to concentrate the sperm near the
cervix. Depending on where things sit, this could be the wrong
position if you were on your back. for some of us lying on a side or
tummy works better.
|
143.95 | questions mom never explained | SALES::LTRIPP | | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:53 | 11 |
| Forgive my ignorance but I remember watching a movie on TV that showed
a Hollywood version of an AI proceedure. I remember the "nurse"
suggesting to the woman that while laying quietly for whatever period
of time after, that she should try to bring herself to orgasm. Is this
accurate or just Hollywood?
FWIW, both times I conceived I was the one on top. Don't ask me how it
ever worked. I was convinced this was the last possible way that
conception would ever take place. And well the rest is called....AJ!
Lyn
|
143.96 | not advice I ever received | DELNI::GIUNTA | | Tue Jul 20 1993 09:40 | 12 |
| Lyn,
I'd say that's Hollywood fantasy (and I remember seeing the same movie).
I've had 12 regular AI's and 9 Intrauterine Insemination attempts, and
no one ever told me to try that to make them more successful. With a
regular AI, they left me slightly elevated for about 10 minutes after
each attempt, and with the IUI's they put a plastic sponge-type device
in to keep the sperm in place for a couple of hours (I don't remember
the exact time, but I think it was something like 2 hours), but that's
about it.
Cathy
|
143.97 | | IMTDEV::COOP | Love will conquer all | Sat Jul 31 1993 04:47 | 4 |
| I remember reading somewhere that having an orgasm produced some kind
of chemical something or other that made it easier to conceive?
|
143.98 | | TROPPO::QUODLING | | Mon Aug 02 1993 00:39 | 4 |
| It certainlly doesn't do any harm... :-)
q
|
143.99 | Woman's orgasm when trying to conceive | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Tue Aug 03 1993 14:31 | 8 |
| It changes the alkalinity (or acidity) in the vagina so that if the
sperm pass through the vagina then you are more likely to have a boy.
Of course, if you are using intra-uterine inseminations then it doesn't
matter a whit (well, at least it doesn't do anything to make it more
likely to conceive, and it may be possible that the contractions may
push out some of the sperm...?).
Carol
|
143.100 | beyond day 20 | DECWET::JO | Mary had a little lamb, with mint jelly. Dot Warner | Thu Sep 22 1994 20:09 | 7 |
|
.3 mentions making love every other day from day 8-20. are there
any repercussions of sexual activity beyond day 20 that may prevent
a pregnancy to occur?
thanks.
jo
|
143.101 | Nope | BRAT::FULTZ | DONNA FULTZ | Fri Sep 23 1994 09:05 | 12 |
|
They mention to have sex during this time frame since you will
only be ovulating during this time frame - if you want to have sex
after that, remember that your done ovulating and chance of getting
pregnant on day 21 is very low..
I don't ovulate until day 18 some people ovulate on day 9.
So answer to your question ? No there are no repercussions.
Donna
|
143.102 | | DECWET::JO | Mary had a little lamb, with mint jelly. Dot Warner | Fri Sep 23 1994 12:20 | 3 |
| thanks.
jo
|
143.103 | Help Anon Noter Predict Ovulation | CNTROL::STOLICNY | | Tue Sep 27 1994 09:11 | 14 |
|
The following is being posted for a member of the PARENTING notesfile
community who prefers to remain anonymous at this time. If you wish
to contact the author by mail, please send your message to me and I will
forward it to the anonymous noter. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Carol Stolicny, PARENTING co-mod
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I have a 25 day cycle (from the first day of my period to the first
day of the next) how do I work out when I'm likely to ovulate?
|
143.104 | | CSC32::M_EVANS | skewered shitake | Tue Sep 27 1994 09:19 | 4 |
| As a rule you are fertile about two weeks before your next period, so
about day 11 would be for ovulation.
meg
|
143.105 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Tue Sep 27 1994 09:21 | 13 |
| There are kits on the market that can help you predict this.
Instructions are included; but having read the instructions more than a
few times, I can tell you that for a 25-day cycle you would begin
testing your urine on day 7 [counting the first day of menses as day
1] and test until you get a positive test [generally 4 or 5 days]
A colour-change indicating an LH [lutenizing hormone] surge predicts
that you will ovulate within the next 12-40 hours.
Fell free to contact me offline.
Annie
|
143.107 | chart with a special thermometer | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Wed Sep 28 1994 13:35 | 13 |
|
To chart your temperature you buy a basel thermometer which is an oral
thermometer that measures each tenth of a degree (or something like
that) so you can carefully track the changes. The thermometer will
come with instructions on how to take the measurements as well as a
chart to use for tracking.
If you really want to be sure when you ovulate you should not just
guess but use a kit or thermometer. If you ended up with infertility
problems charting your temperature is one of the first things they
require you to do.
|
143.108 | "Discharge Control" Method | GVPROD::BETTINA | | Thu Sep 29 1994 05:07 | 14 |
|
My gynecologist advised against the temperature method unless there is
not some evidence that there is a fertility problem. He argues that it is
stressful and cumbersome. I think I agree with him. At my age at that time
(I was 38) he said I should try for a year and then start discussing (it
took me 4 months with the first and 1 with the current).
I nevertheless started using the "discharge control" method which is easy
to use and is quite fascinating to observe (I was almost disappointed when
it was so quick with the second). The idea is that the discharge gets very
liquid 3 days before ovulation and then suddenly thickens (or even stops)
at the moment the ovulation has happened. If one does a bit of counting
on top of it, I think it can give a good indication.
|
143.109 | supplement the temp chart with it | PCBUOA::GIUNTA | | Thu Sep 29 1994 09:49 | 20 |
| I'm sorry, but I don't agree with your gynecologist. Infertility
causes stress, not the other way around. And if you had had any
problems getting pregnant and followed his advice to try for a year and
then go back, the first thing he would have said was that you needed to
go away and chart your temperature for something like 6 months. With
those of us who do end up going the infertility route [and granted,
that's only about 15%, but when you're in that percentage, hearing that
it's a small portion of people who have similar problems doesn't
exactly help], it can be years before they find the cause, if they find
it at all, and it can be years before a successful pregnancy.
The change in mucus you describe is a good indicator, and it can be
used in conjunction with the temperature method. Also, I think it's
easier to do the temperature method while getting used to the mucus
method. And there are those of us, like me, who don't have the mucus
change [which is a fertility problem in itself], so it doesn't work for
everyone.
I'd still say chart the temperature, and supplement it with the mucus
method.
|
143.110 | | CSC32::DUBOIS | unpacking, unpacking, unpacking... | Thu Sep 29 1994 11:29 | 12 |
| < <<< Note 143.109 by PCBUOA::GIUNTA >>>
<
< I'm sorry, but I don't agree with your gynecologist. Infertility
< causes stress, not the other way around.
Are you referring to .108, Cathy? If so, I don't think her gyn said she
shouldn't do the basal temp because it would cause infertility, just that
it would be stressful. It *is* stressful. It's a pain in the you-know-what.
If I were ever to do this again I would do it without the basal temps and just
use the ovulation kits and/or other methods.
Carol
|
143.111 | | ARRODS::WHITEHEADJ | Shades of Scarlett | Thu Sep 29 1994 12:46 | 6 |
| Couldn't other forms of stress delay the process of getting pregnant, ie
work, homelife etc (not to mention the stress of trying to get pregnant)?
Surely that would cause your temperature to rise and therefore confuse
when you think you're likely to ovulate?
Jane.
|
143.112 | stress is a 2-way street | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Thu Sep 29 1994 13:20 | 12 |
| I think infertility causes stress, and stress *can* cause infertility.
I had a few concerns about my fertility when I was trying for Alex,
though I hadn't gotten to the point of being diagnosed (or even tested)
as infertile. I did use the basal thermometer and for me it was
totally stress-FREE! (What could be more simple than rolling over,
grabbing the thermometer from the nightstand, and using it before I
even put my contacts in?!) In fact, being the perfectionist-in-random-
areas-Virgo that I am, having the chart took away stress and gave me
the feeling that I was in control.
FWIW,
Leslie
|
143.113 | | POWDML::AJOHNSTON | beannachd | Thu Sep 29 1994 13:30 | 12 |
| I never found charting my temperature stressful. [except not being
able to urinate for 5 minutes awakening ... tap, tap, tap ... oooh, my
eyes are beginning to water]
My husband, on the other hand, would have preferred to be at _least_
one time-zone away from me during the process.
Because of his distress, I began to become distressed as well. Hence,
once the pattern was established [3 months] I switched to kits and
never went back]
Annie
|
143.114 | RE .109 | GVPROD::BETTINA | | Fri Sep 30 1994 07:57 | 12 |
|
RE .109
>I'm sorry, but I don't agree with your gynecologist. Infertility
>causes stress, not the other way around. And if you had had any
>problems getting pregnant and followed his advice to try for a year (...)
I did not at wanted offend anybody here and I feel sorry if I did. The
only thing my gynecologist recommended is basically that you should not
assume that you have infertility problems *before* trying for a certain
time to get pregnant.
|
143.115 | Stress :-| | CSC32::DUBOIS | unpacking, unpacking, unpacking... | Fri Sep 30 1994 10:22 | 21 |
| < Couldn't other forms of stress delay the process of getting pregnant, ie
< work, homelife etc (not to mention the stress of trying to get pregnant)?
There's no proof of that, Jane, and it's a real sore spot for infertile women.
We are told "relax!" which just makes us feel more stress, as if we are
responsible for our infertility.
The fact of the matter is that infertility is *very* stressful, if you are
trying to get pregnant. For me, nearly every waking moment had some connection
to the pregnancy I was trying to achieve. Everything I ate or didn't eat
was carefully chosen, so I wouldn't harm the baby even inadvertently. Every
time I felt too much pressure or anger or fear, I would try to calm myself
so the baby (in case I was pregnant and didn't know it yet) wouldn't get the
adrenaline or hormones or whatever my body might release. And so on and so on.
There are a lot of women who get pregnant in very stressful times. A *lot*.
Then there's those of us who have a very difficult time even we are relaxed.
By the time we figure out that we're having a difficult time, the stress from
*not* getting pregnant is already there, and can be very, very strong.
Carol
|
143.116 | | CLOUD9::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:25 | 25 |
|
I think that what Jane is trying to get across, is if you start
thinking about maybe it'd be nice to possibly have a little one around,
don't assume, right off the bat, that there might be something 'wrong'
with you, before you even get around to 'trying'.
And I think that even THINKING about it, or even *REALLY* wanting to
get pregnant places more than enough stress on some women to actually
prevent it. How many stories have you heard about the couple who
desperately WANTS a baby, finally adopts a baby, (then presumably
relaxes some) and POOF she's pregnant!
Try not to think about it, try to just decide it'd be okay if it
happened, and I think that the Dr's suggesting you may have better luck
that way. Obviously there's still plenty of people that need a little
help (or else this string wouldn't be here (-:).
I think the "relax!" that Jane is referring to, is more directed to
women who have no reason to think that they may have trouble
conceiving. Obviously after a few/several months of trying, saying
RELAX isn't going to be very effective.
Did I catch that right?
|
143.117 | down blanket ?= electric blanket | DECWET::JO | Mary had a little lamb, with mint jelly. Dot Warner | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:06 | 9 |
|
how hot is hot? i mean they say not to use electric blankets when
trying to conceive. we don't have an electric balnket but we do use
a heavy down comforter. with the current weather changes, some nights
get hotter than others. so how do i know if we're sleeping in a bed
that's too hot?
thanks.
jo
|
143.118 | How do you know if its a boy try or a girl try? | NAC::WALTER | | Mon Dec 02 1996 16:28 | 11 |
143.119 | | CSC32::L_WHITMORE | | Mon Dec 02 1996 17:55 | 10 |
143.120 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Dec 03 1996 08:07 | 26 |
143.121 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Dec 03 1996 08:34 | 9 |
143.122 | | STAR::LEWIS | | Tue Dec 03 1996 09:23 | 9 |
143.123 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Dec 03 1996 10:32 | 9 |
143.124 | Diet for it .... | HAZMAT::WEIER | | Tue Dec 03 1996 11:12 | 18 |
143.125 | Related notes | HAZMAT::WEIER | | Tue Dec 03 1996 11:18 | 1 |
143.126 | The formula | DONVAN::HARRIS | | Wed Dec 04 1996 10:15 | 10 |
143.127 | when can you find out your pregnant? | NAC::WALTER | | Wed Dec 04 1996 13:43 | 10 |
143.128 | 2wks | HAZMAT::WEIER | | Thu Dec 05 1996 12:09 | 14 |
143.129 | | STAR::LEWIS | | Thu Dec 05 1996 12:20 | 9 |
143.130 | blood tests | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Thu Dec 05 1996 17:41 | 10 |
143.131 | what test is more accurate | NAC::WALTER | | Mon Dec 23 1996 09:33 | 3 |
143.132 | | DPE1::ARMSTRONG | | Mon Dec 23 1996 10:30 | 8 |
143.133 | question | NAC::WALTER | | Thu Jan 09 1997 11:01 | 11 |
143.134 | probably missed the window...but you'll know soon! | TUXEDO::BENOIT | | Thu Jan 09 1997 11:57 | 36 |
143.135 | | SMART2::JENNISON | God and sinners, reconciled | Thu Jan 09 1997 12:35 | 14 |
143.136 | frustrated | NAC::WALTER | | Fri Feb 07 1997 14:43 | 22 |
|
My husband and I have been trying for four months now to get pregnant
with no such luck. I'm noticing mucus at day 7-9. Is this too early
to be ovulating if I am very regular on a 28 day cycle? I thought it
would be and don't really want to get an ovulation kit (husband is
stressed a bit by having to do on certain times of month and if I bring
home a kit, it might make matters worse).
Four years ago after not using a diaghram I was pregnant in three
months and not trying at all. I am alittle worried that having an IUD
for a year (taken out four months ago) that something could have
happened to my reproductive system. However, I don't want to call a
doctor because my OB said that unless you have been trying for a year,
its not logical to contact a doctor about not being able to get
pregnant. Would a doctor be able to tell if there were any issues
from the IUD anyways?
Thanks...
impatient ... cj
|
143.137 | | SMART2::JENNISON | And baby makes five | Fri Feb 07 1997 15:19 | 12 |
|
Four months is not unusual. I believe the average is eight
months. If you are "trying" for a specific sex, I'd expect
it to take longer than your own average because you'd be
intentionally limiting your, um, efforts each cycle.
One of the first things a doctor will recommend is basal
temperature charting. You might want to start now, which
will also help you pinpoint your actual ovulation.
Karen
|
143.138 | | MROA::SANTAMARIA | "Cassidy's Mom" | Fri Feb 07 1997 15:48 | 4 |
| Day 9 was just about right for me and I have a regular 28 day cycle.
When I was trying to get pregnant with my daughter I was doing the
daily temperature routine along with various other tests and know for
sure that I conceived on Day 9 of my cycle.
|
143.139 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon Feb 10 1997 08:48 | 6 |
|
Try charting the basal temperature, it gives you a pretty
good idea when you ovulate so you don't have to guess.
Eva
|
143.140 | | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Mon Feb 10 1997 17:25 | 10 |
| While a hassle starting the basal temp readings now it gets you that much
ahead of the game if you end up going to your doctor. If you go to
your doctor, he/she will either send you home to do the basal thing
or the ovulation kit before any other tests are performed.
While it can be stressful having to plan when you do "it", never mind
adding the temperature readings, it just might get you pregnant
earlier.
|
143.141 | | SAPPHO::DUBOIS | Justice is not out-of-date | Tue Feb 11 1997 10:10 | 7 |
| < While a hassle starting the basal temp readings now it gets you that much
< ahead of the game if you end up going to your doctor.
Yeah, but you could do the ovulation kits ahead of time, and that would
be a lot easier. The ovulation kits can now be purchased at the supermarket.
Carol
|
143.142 | what exactely is basal temp? | NAC::WALTER | | Tue Feb 18 1997 10:47 | 3 |
| Pardon my ignorance, but a basal temp is just your normal temp right?
cj
|
143.143 | Basal temp != normal temp | NYOSS1::LANKA | | Tue Feb 18 1997 12:44 | 10 |
| When you keep a basal temperature chart, you must take your temperature
before getting out of bed in the morning for it to be accurate. This
is not the same as taking the temperature at any time during the day.
Just getting out of bed will alter the reading. A doctor will ask you
to keep a basal temperature chart when he is trying to determine when
you are ovulating. It is usually one of the first steps taken when you
go to see a doctor if you have not been able to get pregnant on your
own.
Maria
|
143.144 | not just any thermometer, either | MPGS::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Feb 18 1997 13:06 | 5 |
| It's a finely-calibrated thermometer (shows a range of only 2 or 3
degrees F, I think) because you're looking for variations in tenths of
a degree. Drugstores have 'em.
Leslie
|
143.145 | | MOIRA::FAIMAN | Wandrer, du M�der, du bist zu Haus | Tue Feb 18 1997 14:11 | 8 |
| You body temperature varies up and down by as much as a couple of degrees over
the course of a normal day. The "basal" temperature is just the low temperature
at the end of a night's sleep, before you've started moving around. (I believe
that even the exercise of getting out of bed is enough to raise you body
temperature a couple tenths of a degree above the basal temperature, which would
be a big enough error to throw off an ovulation chart.)
-Neil
|
143.146 | Ovulation questions | CSC32::M_EVANS | be the village | Tue Apr 08 1997 13:09 | 31 |
| The author of this note would like to remain anonymous at this time.
should you wish to reply anonymously or send mail to the author please
send me mail and I will be happy to forward or otherwise do the right
thing.
meg
Hi,
I'm just wondering if anyone else has had this happen and eventually
got pregnant:
I had a miscarriage (at 8.5 wks) in November. Had a D&C and was told
to wait two cycles before trying again. Since I'm on a 4-5 week cycle,
I didn't complete both until early-mid Feb. After not getting preg in
Feb, I started taking my temp (upon waking), it never really spiked
(to show ovulation). I was sick for a week and during that time, it
went from 98 to 100 for 1 day (and we took the appropriate action 8-)
but it never did what I'd seen it do before (go a bit high, spike and
then back to normal over a 2-3 day period). I just got my monthly
confirmation that I am again, not pregnant.
Anyway, I don't have another appt with the Dr. until June and I'm sure
I'm just overly curious, but has anyone else ever seen this? I guess
I really wondering because everyone always says how much more fertile
you are after having a pregnancy and I seem to not even be ovulating.
In the meantime, I'm not going to obsess about it and at least the
practice is fun!
Thanks,
|
143.147 | Every Day or Every Other Day? | BSS::KELLY_NA | | Wed May 21 1997 13:38 | 10 |
| Hi,
Was just wondering if you should have sex every day or every other
day during your fertile time - we made love every day for about 1
week (even used an ovulation predictor and made sure we hit the next
3 days).
Got my period this morning :-(
-Nancy
|
143.148 | Every other day | PETST3::STOLICNY | | Wed May 21 1997 14:02 | 6 |
|
I've heard every other day recommended frequently. I may be
stretching my knowledge here but I think it has to do with
allowing the sperm supply to recuperate.
Carol
|
143.149 | | DPE1::ARMSTRONG | | Wed May 21 1997 14:55 | 6 |
| > I've heard every other day recommended frequently. I may be
> stretching my knowledge here but I think it has to do with
> allowing the sperm supply to recuperate.
me too...and enjoy it!
bob
|
143.150 | Thanks... | BSS::KELLY_NA | | Wed May 21 1997 15:54 | 22 |
| Thanks,
I thought it was mentioned somewhere in this notesfile but the book
I have (Getting Pregnant) doesn't mention the every-other-day factor
being beneficial.
I'm hopeful that some day I may become pregnant but have some strikes
against me:
- Age 39 (never been pregnant - 2nd husband now)
- had surgery last August for fibroid tumors, endometriosis,
and a cyst on one of my ovaries
Other than that, I'm healthy as a horse!
If anyone else has either tried the every day vs. every-other-day
factor, let me know!
- Nancy
|