[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference misery::feline

Title:Meower Power - Where Differing Opinions are Respected
Notice:purrrrr...
Moderator:JULIET::CORDES_JA
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1079
Total number of notes:28858

1056.0. "Friskies Warning! Salmon flavour." by KERNEL::COFFEYJ (La Feline Flooz - a unix cat) Mon Jan 20 1997 02:03

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1056.1BRAT::JENNISONAngels Guide Me From The CloudsMon Jan 20 1997 07:141
1056.2KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catMon Jan 20 1997 07:5528
1056.3DECWIN::JUDYThat's *Ms. Bitch* to you!!Mon Jan 20 1997 08:0913
1056.4USCTR1::MERRITT_SKitty CityMon Jan 20 1997 09:036
1056.5NETCAD::DREYERI need a vacation!!Mon Jan 20 1997 09:066
1056.6Contamination?PCBUOA::FEHSKENSlen - reformed architectMon Jan 20 1997 12:497
1056.7Tuck this away for future useSNAX::SMITHI FEEL THE NEEDTue Jan 21 1997 04:5532
1056.8HOW AWFUL!!!CSLALL::MHOLMESTue Jan 21 1997 06:406
1056.9BRAT::JENNISONAngels Guide Me From The CloudsTue Jan 21 1997 06:434
1056.10Is this even true?SMURF::SHIDERLYTue Jan 21 1997 06:574
1056.11Hope it helps prevent this in the future...NETCAD::DREYERI need a vacation!!Tue Jan 21 1997 07:133
1056.12VAXCPU::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerTue Jan 21 1997 07:3912
1056.13KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catTue Jan 21 1997 08:0617
1056.14KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catTue Jan 21 1997 08:1115
1056.15PADC::KOLLINGKarenTue Jan 21 1997 11:285
1056.16KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catWed Jan 22 1997 02:0729
1056.17MPGS::WOOLNERYour dinner is in the supermarketWed Jan 22 1997 05:517
1056.18KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catWed Jan 22 1997 06:5158
1056.19What About the Lab Test?CSLALL::MHOLMESThu Jan 23 1997 09:304
1056.20KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catThu Jan 23 1997 09:443
1056.21It's been a week, has the lab finished yet?VAXCPU::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerThu Jan 30 1997 21:481
> Not yet, I'll post it as soon as I get anything... 
1056.22KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catFri Jan 31 1997 07:3421
Latest update I have I received this morning after chasing... 

Subject: Re: TAR: Friskies danger 
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <Pine.SV4.3.91.970130210035.10649B-100000@iquest7>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


	I haven't heard any more about the kits (hmm.. I think I'll msg 
Wee and see if SHE has).  
	My little ones have been eating mostly dried, and I usually feed 
them a different brand.

	I'll be sure to pass on anything else I hear.

Diana
 


......so hopefully we should have more info next week. 
1056.23I'm keeping an open mind either wayVAXCPU::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerFri Jan 31 1997 08:4116
> Latest update I have I received this morning after chasing... 
> 
> Subject: Re: TAR: Friskies danger 
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Message-Id: <Pine.SV4.3.91.970130210035.10649B-100000@iquest7>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> [.....] 
> ......so hopefully we should have more info next week. 

	Hmm, what happened to the Date: header?  Ie. "next week" is
	relative to what date?

	I'm still skeptical of these "I heard this from a reliable friend,
	who heard it from a reliable friend, who heard from ...." things.
1056.24PADC::KOLLINGKarenFri Jan 31 1997 10:343
    I received a letter from Friskies saying they were investigating and
    that it was "an isolated incident."  But no further info.
    
1056.25KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catMon Feb 03 1997 09:3472
>	Hmm, what happened to the Date: header?  Ie. "next week" is
>	relative to what date?

Well, like I said I received it from her that morning, at most 
she mailed me half a day before I'd say, so I think
I probably meant next week from now, today, when I posted her mail 
that I received that morning.  Like the week that is this week now. 
As in when I'm posting this note now. 

I don't post the headers of everything cause I don't see it to be 
my place to bandy around the email address of someone who's being 
friendly and helpful to me to a bunch of people they've never met.


>	I'm still skeptical of these "I heard this from a reliable friend,
>	who heard it from a reliable friend, who heard from ...." things.

Fine, Skepticism is well and good but so is information. 

For the did it happen at all skepticism:  How about the fact that I have 
the mail from Nestle UK saying yes they now know of the incident and 
the US Nestle are seriously investigating it with the owner.  
I mean how much proof that something happened here do we need!

As for what actually happened skepticism: Well that's exactly what
we're trying to find out and what Nestle, the breeder involved
and her lawyer and vets are looking into too. 

This isn't meant to be panic mongering or scare tactics or an 
attack on Nestle. Something happened. Their food was the common 
element, it may not have been the cause but is under investigation.
 
The only real bit open to question in skepticism is did the owner 
really take care wtih her cats or did she unintentionally poisin
them with detergent in their runs.    I'm one step away from the owner, 
in this mail link, from what I can gather she is a caring owner who's made 
the effort to find out what you keep clear of cats cause it can be harmful
and that's enough for me, I accept you might think otherwise and please feel 
free to take as large a pinch of salt as possible with the idea that this 
maine coon breeder cares about and trys to be careful with her cats. 

But, when it comes down to it it's like this:

There's a bunch of cats been hospitalised and potentially crippled 
(remember the sterility and temperature) by something. 

They were owned and looked after by someone who is as caring as us,

It's possible she made a mistake with a household item such as detergent, 
but if she did then it's worth us knowing about too so we don't kill our 
cats through ignorance. 

It's possible Nestle/Friskies made a mistake, be it in the food 
contents, which they're trying hard to eliminate, or the canning, 
or storage or something like that - that's being investigated and 
I think it's worth keeping updated on. 

The third possibility I can think of is one I think we'd all want to know
about - that the can was intentionally spiked, unlikely as a can provides 
reasonable protection,  but who knows who all the people working in a 
Friskies canning plant are, whether any of them consider Nestle a company
in need of reprisals for their behaviour towards developing world mothers
and their milk products, and didn't consider the victim of their protest..
or some such. 

Otherwise there aren't many explainations that fit the symptoms,
so many cats at once, so suddenly, it's not going to be an individual
food intolerance is it now - the vet didn't think so. 

One way or another unless you're questioning whether anything happened 
at all, in which case I give up entirely, I think I should have helped 
answer a few bits for you there.. 
1056.26REFDV1::REILLYSat Feb 08 1997 09:434
    The symptoms sound like organophosphate poisoning.  Did your friend
    give any kind of parasite dips around the time of the problem?  Did she
    use any kind of pesticides in the cattery area or on plants that the
    kitties could have gotten into?  
1056.27KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catMon Feb 10 1997 02:2739
I'm still waiting for an update... 


However after watching "watchdog" a consumer program, 
over here, there's a big fuss over some of the flea
treatments and this kind of reaction so I wouldn't 
be suprised, but


>and horribly burnt mouths,Her lower lip is also eaten away.

doesn't sound right for it.. especially when... 

>The only cats that got sick were those that ate that Friskies cat food.

and it seems more unlikely when... 

>we don't even have caustics like oven cleaner in our house. The
>disinfectant concentrate we use is an organic that in pure form causes
>"nausea and vomiting", it is considered to be non toxic to animals and
>humans.

especially since... 

>My vet rubbed some of the cat food leftovers on his arm and had to wash it
>off about 5 minutes later due to a "burning sensation". He's sent it to a lab
>to be analyzed.

Unless maybe the cans of food had been contaminated externally in a store or 
some such and the toxins got in when it was opened?




I don't know any more but will post when I do.. I think I might mail Nestle and 
ask for an update.....


jo. 
1056.28REFDV1::REILLYMon Feb 10 1997 15:304
    Another potential culprit could be cleaning/disinfectant solutions. 
    Roccal, a common disinfectant used in animal hospitals/kennels/catteries, 
    can cause serious GI ulceration & burns if the animal ingests it (even
    off of the cages that have been cleaned - if enough was used).
1056.2940 days since the original report to the fanciers mailing list, any update?VAXCPU::michaudJeff Michaud - ObjectBrokerFri Feb 21 1997 14:340
1056.30KERNEL::COFFEYJLa Feline Flooz - a unix catTue Feb 25 1997 03:491
None so far.