T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1328.1 | How bout these | CADSYS::SHEPARD | | Mon Sep 19 1988 08:15 | 13 |
|
I have recently been shopping for a midproced CD player also. I
would recommend checking out the new line of Yamaha players with
the hi-bit sampling feature. (They'll probably throw you a mess
of garbage about 20 bit technology and 8 times oversampling, but
actually these new players with these added hype seem to so an
excellent job of true 16 bit sampling). I have recently purchased
the Yamaha cdx510 and am thoroughly satisfied. I've also heard
excellent things about the new line from Denon. Check them out
too. I've never really been big on Carver and HK. Anyway, I would
go Yamaha or Denon.
Good Luck,
Dave
|
1328.2 | don't laugh, I | EUCLID::OWEN | | Mon Sep 19 1988 09:08 | 8 |
| Take a look at the new sony 5-disc players. It may seem like a
cheap gimic, but I think they're really great players. 4x oversampling
and 3" cd capeability. Give them a look before you knock it off
of your list.
I have had mine for almost a year. It has been brought to parties
and back and forth the school a number of times. The durability
test results thus far seem excellent.
|
1328.3 | Mr. Yamaha, you make good cd players. | POLAR::CAMPBELL | | Tue Sep 20 1988 08:41 | 6 |
| I vote for Yamaha. I recently purchased the 810 model (8X os).
It's excellent. The remote control is excellent. I think that for
what you get it's very reasonably priced. Even if you want to spend
less, I'd still reccommend the model 510 mentioned a couple of notes
back as opposed to a HK or Sony, etc. The 510 has 4X os which is
superior to the HK 2X os, at about the same price.
|
1328.4 | Yamaha has a very POOR track record with CD players | DSSDEV::CHALTAS | Come with me to the Cash Bar | Tue Sep 20 1988 11:07 | 17 |
| Gee -- all of a sudden people are extolling the reliability of their
*new* Yamaha CD players.
Take note that a fair number of people (myself included), have
complained or are complaining about the POOR reliability of their
not-so-new Yamahas. I wouln't buy another -- the first was junk,
exchanged for a 'new model' (very similar) after unsuccessful
repair attempts. The new one is fair, but still has pretty
bad tracking problems (on disks that a Philips CD player tracks
with no trouble at all).
Unless someone convinces me that Yamaha has COMPLETELY redesigned
the transport/tracking mechanism, and VERY thoroughly tested it,
I would under NO circumstances reccomend a Yamaha CD player.
George
|
1328.5 | | WONDER::STRANGE | Pay your money, Take your choice. | Tue Sep 20 1988 14:37 | 6 |
| I would strongly second .-1. I have a friend who had a Yamaha (got
it new about two years ago), and it skips all over the place. I
assume they must have done some redesigning if there are now so
many satisfied customers.
Steve
|
1328.6 | Hold on now, those are old | CADSYS::SHEPARD | | Tue Sep 20 1988 15:17 | 16 |
|
re .4 .5
From what I've heard, the new series of CD players put out by yamaha
has fixed the tracking problems (well patched actually) by providing
many times the sampling performance as far as more bits and higher
rate. Furthermore, after receiving bad reviews as far as the quality
of the chips used in the filters, they have replaced them with a
higher grade. Thats why the new series has different numbers, its
much improved over the older series.
I still give Denon high recommendations also. Anybody have comments
on their new line.
Finally, as far as skipping, the more expensive models employ some
extra suspension elements that alleviates them.
|
1328.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Tue Sep 20 1988 16:32 | 6 |
| Re: .6
I don't see how oversampling has any bearing on tracking performance.
There are no more bits read from the disc than before.
Steve
|
1328.8 | Once bitten... | DSSDEV::CHALTAS | There ain't no Sanity Clause | Wed Sep 21 1988 07:41 | 9 |
| re .6
Yes, they are 'old'. But the changes you mentioned all have NOTHING
to do with tracking. I'm not saying that the new Yamahas are bad,
I have no way of knowing. I'm saying that the older Yamahas are
terrible, and I'd make darned sure that the new ones have a
completely new transport before I'd spend fifty cents for one.
George
|
1328.9 | If you say so... | CADSYS::SHEPARD | | Wed Sep 21 1988 09:52 | 11 |
|
Okay, I'm not going to argue with you guys about something I probably
don't know as much about, although I have been led to believe that
oversampling improves error tracking. If that isn't the case, then
why does anybody include any oversampling in CD players.
What about the new DENON players. I've heard good stuff about them
also, and they are in approx. the same price range. We've got to
agree on some brand or this topic isn't going to help .0 with a
new player at all.
Dave
|
1328.10 | | WONDER::STRANGE | Pay your money, Take your choice. | Wed Sep 21 1988 15:16 | 11 |
| re: -1
Oversampling helps out the designers of the analog output filters,
because they don't have to make the low-pass cut-off as steep, which
means less phase shifting and more stable filters. I was under
the impression that oversampling does not mean the same bits are
read multiple times, but that the bits are just repeated multiple
times in the decoding software, yeilding a higher effective sampling
rate.
Steve
|
1328.11 | My 2 Cents | POLAR::CAMPBELL | | Thu Sep 22 1988 07:21 | 5 |
| RE .-1
Yes. Oversampling extent is a measure of the number of computed
samples inserted between successive disc samples. ie - the degree
of data interpolation.
|
1328.12 | Another 2 cents. (4 cents total now.) | POLAR::CAMPBELL | | Thu Sep 22 1988 07:22 | 2 |
| Incidentally, for anyone not aware of it, the Yamaha CDX-1110 was
tested in September AUDIO. It was very well regarded.
|
1328.13 | more help please. | HARLEY::DAVE | Dave | Thu Sep 22 1988 07:30 | 17 |
| I went down to cook audio (tweeder) last night. They didn't
have any of the new yamaha cd's. But they did have the prices.
VERY EXPENSIVE!!! My mother is a supervisor at Pease Air Force
Base Exchange and got me onto the base to check out the equipment.
The Carver cd was $520.00, numerous panasonic and kenwood cd's
on sale below $300.00. The catalog has the new yamaha's, they
don't carry the complete line, but they did have one that I liked.
I think it is called a cdx900u, or something like that, it's the
new 18 bit one. It actually has a 20 bit range, it shifts between
the high and low order 2 bits. Cook priced it at $699.00, the catalog
had it at $410.00. Talk about markup. But the choice is unchoosen,
I still have not put the money on the table. I am uncertain due
to the rumblings about yama reliability. Denon's are hard to find.
I also have not been able to find anything on them in consumers
report. Please keep the note coming. Thank you.
Dave
|
1328.14 | Wow, I wonder what .0 is going to buy now. | CADSYS::SHEPARD | | Thu Sep 22 1988 08:27 | 26 |
|
re .10 .11
Thanks for clearing that up for me guys.
re .12
Yeah, its specs are impressive, but it lists for around $1200 -$1300.
For that kind of money, there are some other brands I would go with,
i.e. Stereophile gave the Nakamichi players a better review. They
said the Naks D-A converter chips were better quality than the Yamahas.
This corrected problems with nonlinearity. This isn't something
I would really care about with my system at this time. But if you're
going to spend around $1300 on a CD player, I would assume you have
a pretty good system and would care about little things like this.
re .13
The cdx900u is 2nd from the top of the line of the 87 models, the
older models that everyone in this topic is complaining about.
It also got mixed reviews from different magazines. Gross linearity
problems as listed in stereophile. The newer model is the cdx910.
Also I believe the cdx910 has a higher list price than the older
model.
Dave
|
1328.15 | Try a LUXMAN | ELWOOD::WAXMAN | | Thu Sep 22 1988 16:50 | 5 |
| Based on my own personal experience, I would strongly recommend a LUXMAN.
If you can get to Sudbury, go to Electric Gramaphone for a demo. In the
past, EG has offered your choice of some number of free CD's instead of
a discount.
|
1328.16 | I'm too new to this. | MAMIE::OLOUGHLIN | | Fri Sep 23 1988 15:02 | 16 |
|
This may muddy the water quite abit since I've only owned one
for two weeks but...
I just purchased the Denon CD 600 at Tweeter (Cook'n) for 229.00.
It's only 2x os, but I love this thing. I will trow out my turntable
this weekend!
I believe it lists for 300, but they probably lied to me about
that. So my input is; The Denon I bought is great.
With that aside, I would like to ask the more experianced noters
here a question. Should I take advantage of the upgrade option
that Tweeter has? I don't mind giving it back if I can get *much*
better quality for 100 -150 bucks more.
|
1328.17 | Go Denon... | PARITY::GOSSELIN | Ken @DTN 247-2498 | Tue Sep 27 1988 12:48 | 24 |
| RE: .0
Be advised that Yamaha made the guts for Carver's CD player as
recently as 24 months' ago; dunno if this is still true.
Consumer's Reports articles should be taken with a grain of sodium,
IMO. They tend to test mostly mainline stuff, which is why you probably
didn't see a report on Denon. Try Digital Audio for CD test reports;
Ken Pohlmann writes good ones. Incidentally, every Denon report
I've ever read was a rave. If you want to know who carries Denon
in the your area, give Denon a call (number is in here or the phone
book).
I have an early Carver; I've experienced some minor skipping problems
during warmup, then the player sounds fine. The Time Lens circuitry
is fun for a while, but I find I don't switch it on very often.
When it comes time to replace the Carver, I'll be buying Denon
(although the Sony ES series is VERY nice)........
Ken
|
1328.18 | different day, same question | HARLEY::DAVE | it's tee time !!! | Tue Nov 15 1988 08:07 | 13 |
|
Well,
It's question and answer time again. The carver cd is on sale
for $429.00/100 and the yamaha cdx 900 is orderable for $410.00/100
plus import duty, maybe 5 to 10 %. The carver is here now. Any opinions
out there concerning the two. The sony's also look good.
By the way, I tried to get the sanyo going again, but no luck
so I ran it over the the Harley and throw it in the trash. Piece
of junk.
Dave
|