T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
710.1 | Couples... | MSEE::KELLEY | Custom clubs/club repair | Mon Aug 07 1989 12:48 | 14 |
|
My #1 pick is Fred Couples...
My ten picks are...
Nick Faldo
Tom Kite
Greg Norman (I am sure jj will aslo pick Greg... ;-)...)
Tom Watson
Chip Beck
Payne Stewart
Mark Calcavecchia
Bob Tway
The Zinger...
|
710.2 | my pick | FLORES::STIRLING | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:04 | 1 |
| larry nelson
|
710.3 | This Major's a Payne | CURIE::TDAVIS | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:06 | 2 |
| It'll be the first PGA won in knickers since Sarazan.
|
710.4 | Tom Watson | JACOB::SUMMERS | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:08 | 3 |
| Tom Watson. He's got his confidence back after coming so close
to winning the British Open.
|
710.5 | Tway | STUDIO::PIEL | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:13 | 8 |
| I will take Bob Tway.
Ken
|
710.6 | No idea | CPDW::LACAIRE | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:33 | 8 |
| This is a hard one to call. Mark Calc's feet are'nt back on the
ground yet. The Shark has got to be devastated.
One of these...
1. Bob Tway
2. Zinger
3. Bernard Langer
|
710.7 | I like the SHARK | DINSCO::BURKE | Network Management Solutions | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:40 | 4 |
|
Greg will prove he has what it takes to win.
|
710.8 | "THE BEST of the BEST" | USMFG::TGLASS | | Mon Aug 07 1989 13:45 | 12 |
| Hi,
My pick for this one will come from the bunch that includes:
Larry Nelson
Curtis Strange
Tom Watson
Tom Kite
Of course and as usual, my real favorite is a big blond from Ohio by
the name of Jack Nicklaus!
Tom
|
710.9 | | EUCLID::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Mon Aug 07 1989 14:23 | 15 |
| The course!
I played Kemper Lakes two years ago. It's a great course and I will enjoy
watching how the pros play it. It's got to be tough working at Kemper
Headquarters which is surrounded by this great course. It would drive me
crazy being stuck indoors looking out at it.
When I was there they were narrowing the fairways. I remember on one short
hole they we narrowing the fairway from 25yds. to 15yds!.
Given the fairways & the fact that the course has a lot of water I would
think someone who hits the ball straight & keeps it in play will do well.
Probably someone like Curtis Strange.
Larry
|
710.10 | NOT A BONA-FIDE PREDICTION | SANFAN::GRANT_JO | | Mon Aug 07 1989 14:29 | 6 |
| I've played this course and it was too tough for me; it definitely
requires someone who hits it long and straight. But what else is
new for the pros? I think the winner will be someone that no one
predicts!
|
710.11 | Strange | MJOSWS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Mon Aug 07 1989 15:16 | 1 |
| Curtis has the accuracy...
|
710.12 | The Chipster due for a win!!! | BUSY::SWANEY | is this the other side of Paradise?? | Mon Aug 07 1989 16:53 | 11 |
|
well this is another tough one!
Curtis Strange
Mark Mccumber
Seve Ballesteros
and lets throw in Chip Beck
BS
|
710.13 | there can be only one | SUBURB::BOYDA | | Tue Aug 08 1989 08:29 | 6 |
|
Listen guys your all way out of line with these predictions. There's
only one winner and it has to be Arnold Palmer (who else ?)
Al :-)
|
710.14 | PGA Picks | AKOV11::GWILSON | | Tue Aug 08 1989 09:52 | 7 |
| I'll go with:
Ben Crenshaw
Chip Beck
Paul Azinger
Greg Norman (the great white)
Gary
|
710.15 | And the winner is...... | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | My painted horse is weeping... | Tue Aug 08 1989 10:51 | 4 |
| I'll go with Curtis Strange to win, followed closely by Azinger,
Crenshaw and Kite.
Beak
|
710.16 | | LDP::DIAZ | MAKE THEM EASY | Tue Aug 08 1989 11:45 | 4 |
| Calccavechia is hot after the British Open, but I think that either
the Kite or the Singer will be the winner.
Tavo
|
710.17 | my picks | BTOVT::HOGANP | | Tue Aug 08 1989 13:25 | 7 |
|
Curtis Strange
Tom Watson
Tom Kite
Mark Calcahoweveryouspellit
The Mex
|
710.18 | Hal Sutton in a playoff | JUPITR::RUGG | | Tue Aug 08 1989 14:18 | 8 |
|
I'll go with Hal Sutton winning in a playoff over Mark Calcaveccia.
Of course this will require Hal waking up and burying a few
no-brainers.
Paul
|
710.19 | Super Mex | HIRISK::FAGERBERG | | Tue Aug 08 1989 15:49 | 5 |
|
I'd love to see Super Mex win it. It would really complicate his
decision Dec 1st when he turns 50. There still is a multi-year
exemption with the win isn't there???
|
710.20 | I like Lee too... | DINSCO::BURKE | Network Management Solutions | Tue Aug 08 1989 17:21 | 12 |
| Re: .19
> I'd love to see Super Mex win it. It would really complicate his
> decision Dec 1st when he turns 50. There still is a multi-year
> exemption with the win isn't there???
I don't think Lee's decision would be complicated at all. He could
make more money and be more successful (winning wise) on the senior
tour.
Jeff
|
710.21 | WHO??? | BOGUSS::COOPER | MAD HACKER | Tue Aug 08 1989 19:40 | 5 |
| MY VOTE GOES TO JOHHNY REVOLTA OR I GUESS CURTIS STRANGE IF
JOHHNY DOESN'T SHOW UP !!
THE MAD HACKER
|
710.22 | "On A Given Day..." | CLSTR1::VARLEY | | Wed Aug 09 1989 10:24 | 1 |
| Skee Riegel or Sam Urzetta.
|
710.23 | Gamblers Hunch: Norman | CSCOA3::CONWAY_J | | Wed Aug 09 1989 11:08 | 42 |
| NEWS FLASH!!!!!
Mark Calcavecchia withdraws from PGA upon birth of daughter. Mark
says "Being with Sheryl at this time is more important than any
golf tournament, even a major." The kid has his head screwed on
right, but I'll miss him saturday and sunday.
The big Question in my mind is "Does The Shark stand a chance?"
Lets look at the record:
1984 US Open - Norman hits a four iron into the stands, negating
a birdie opportunity to win outright by a stroke. Loses to Zoeller
in an 18 hole playoff (by 8 strokes)
1986 Masters - Norman again pulls his four iron into the crowd and
bogeys the 18th. he needed a bird to win, or a par to force a playoff
with Jack. No cigar.
1986 PGA - Norman has a four shot lead with 9 holes to play and
loses on the final hole when Tway holes his bunker shot.
1987 Masters - On second hole of sudden death, Larry Mize pulls off
a miracle. Go figure!
1989 Masters - Needs a par on eighteen to tie Nick Faldo, hits a
5 iron short and winds up with a bogey.
1989 British Open - After a Masterful 64 on the final eighteen to
force a playoff with Wayne Grady and Mark Calcavecchia, Greg bogey's
the 17th to fall into a tie with Calc. then the disaster on 18......
Says Lee Trevino, " The man is too agressive. Thats what cost Greg
Norman all those tournaments. The man can flat play his golf ball,
but he has to learn when to charge, and when to be patient. I told
him that Arnold Palmer won 63 tournaments , but he probably should
have won 110."
Having said all that, I believe the man is due, so on the principal
that the law of averages have to come back into line someday, and
that even a stopped clock is right twice a day........ I PICK NORMAN.
|
710.24 | | CSCMA::WHITE | | Wed Aug 09 1989 15:22 | 15 |
| Top Choices
1. Greg Norman (Playing well when he plays and long over due)
2. Couples (If he ever learned to Win he'd be among the greats)
3. Beck (A man who knows where the ball is going)
4. Strange (He has the accuracy but needs to keep cool)
5. Price (He can shoot 63 anywhere anytime)
Bad Choices
1. Stewart - (Should have won the British and still has the
Monkey on his back).
2. Langer - (He shoots a first round 66 then ends with an 80)
|
710.25 | it's about time for him | FRAGLE::STUART | tee many martoonies | Wed Aug 09 1989 15:26 | 9 |
|
Sir Walrus is due !!! He had a good showing in the British Open.
He really hasn't been heard from since his Masters win back in
198? ...
I'll go with Craig Stadler !!
ace
|
710.26 | 18th hole | CPDW::LACAIRE | | Wed Aug 09 1989 16:58 | 9 |
|
I was reading in golf digest about how Norman plays 18 (a sharp
dog-leg left with water everywhere. The conventional way to play it
is out to a (safe?) landing area then some iron into the green. In an
exhibition match last year he went for it and carried the ball over
300yds from tee to green. Since then they put up some trees to block
this approach, but the Shark says he's still gonna go for it.
Go Shark!
|
710.27 | | ENGINE::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Wed Aug 09 1989 18:29 | 12 |
| > I was reading in golf digest about how Norman plays 18 (a sharp
> dog-leg left with water everywhere. The conventional way to play it
> is out to a (safe?) landing area then some iron into the green. In an
> exhibition match last year he went for it and carried the ball over
> 300yds from tee to green. Since then they put up some trees to block
> this approach, but the Shark says he's still gonna go for it.
If he truly does that in the competition round then Mr. CONWAY_J
is right about the man. I read an article that said that from
the tee it is something like 292yds. of carry across the water!
Larry
|
710.28 | 5 bob each way on Faldo and Norman | YUPPY::MOSSMAN | A lone mongoose in a world of snakes | Thu Aug 10 1989 08:48 | 17 |
| Gosh !
Just reading through the replies, can't you tell where this conference
is located.
Having said that, however, I'm not really any more confident about
the European challenge than any of you guys seem to be but I must
go with our man Nick. If nothing else, at least he has proved he
can play 72 holes straight from tee to green and I've got an idea
that this course demands efficient (boring?) play rather than heroics.
My long shot has got to be Greg (if only he can keep the ball in
the park).
M.
|
710.29 | did seve` pass on this one ? | PHENIX::MCSHANE | maybe you had too much to fast | Thu Aug 10 1989 15:54 | 10 |
| ok don't laugh..
HOWARD TWITTY he's due !! he's over due.
if not him..my main man
CURTIS STRANGE
top 5 dark horse
DAVE RUMMELLS
bob, who switched to putting crosshanded
|
710.30 | Behold Your King! | CSCOA3::CONWAY_J | | Fri Aug 11 1989 09:17 | 11 |
| I knew it couldn't last, but for one brief, shinning moment the
King was back. After 16 holes yesterday Arnold Palmer was 6 under
and tied with Radar Reid for the lead in the PGA. Five straight
birdies! Not bad for a guy kicking the door down on his 60th birthday!
So what he bogeyed 17 and 18? That division of the "Army" that was
present at Kemper Lakes didn't care and neither did I. The King
Is Back!
P.S. Watson 5 under, Palmer 4 under, Nicklaus 4 under! My kinda
leaderboard!
|
710.31 | Standings after 1st round... | MSEE::KELLEY | Custom clubs/club repair | Fri Aug 11 1989 09:18 | 32 |
|
Leaders after the first round... check out some of these names...!
Mike Reid 66
Leonard Thompson 66
Tom Watson 67
Tom Kite 67
Chris Perry 67
Ben Crenshaw 68
Ian Woosnam 68
Phil Blackmar 68
Dave Rummells 68
Arnold Palmer 68
Jack Nicklaus 68
Mark O'Meara 68
Strange 70
Faldo 70
Stadler 71
Seve 72
Couples 73
Langer 74
Norman 74
Azinger 74
Stewart 74
As mentioned earlier Calcavecchia isn't there...
|
710.32 | Is this really the year 1989? | AKOV11::GWILSON | | Fri Aug 11 1989 10:23 | 10 |
|
What a gallery pleasing pairing if they they put Arnie, Jack
and Crenshaw together (could the course hold all those people?)
What a surprise to see all my fav's up near the top. Anyone have
a tape of the first round that I could view? Taping the first round
never entered my mind as I was washing the dishes, putting the kids
to bed (etc..)
Gary
|
710.33 | PALMER PSYCHED UP! | SANFAN::GRANT_JO | Don't say `shank' | Fri Aug 11 1989 16:19 | 6 |
| According to Palmer in the paper this morn, he bogied 17 and 18
because he was so pumped up he "didn't know my own strength."
I surely hope that Watson, Nicklaus and Arnie can stay close to
the lead through Friday, so I can watch them on the tube on Saturday.
Mirabile dictu!
|
710.34 | curtis TAKE A PILL | PHENIX::MCSHANE | maybe you had too much to fast | Mon Aug 14 1989 08:37 | 5 |
| to bad radar 3 putts the 71st hole, good to see payne birdie 3 of
the last 4.
and who was it who picked dave rummells as a top 5 ....
3rd all by himself. just couldn't birdie...
|
710.35 | like Payne says "Don't drink and Drive!!!" | BUSY::SWANEY | is this the other side of Paradise?? | Mon Aug 14 1989 08:59 | 19 |
|
What do you think good finish or what??? I thought it was very
exciting.
And I was wondering if most of you enjoyed the Pro-Commentating
from Jack as much as I did. It was funny on the 17 win the commentator
(who I don't remember?) said well Andy Bean Needs to go right at
it (the stick) if he's going to win. And then Jack agreed. When
Greg Norman was ready to hit he said well he doesn't really have
a chance to win but we all now how he plays he's going right at
it. That's when he jumped on all the Norman Basher's and said he
is just a good player and that's the way he does it.
WAY to go JACK
just my 2 cents
BS
|
710.36 | "VISIONING is for the EXPERTS" | USMFG::TGLASS | | Mon Aug 14 1989 09:08 | 10 |
| They are a very visionary bunch out there.
Again yesterday, Payne stood on the 10th tee and told his caddy
that a 31 on the back nine was needed to win.
Well, he shot 31 and won.
Very much like the comment that the Shark made to his wife on the
morning before his last day at Royal Troon.
These golfers really know where they are and what it takes to beat
the leaders!
Tom
|
710.37 | A little self congratulation never hurt anyone. | CURIE::TDAVIS | | Mon Aug 14 1989 10:31 | 9 |
| I finally got one right! Thank you, Payne Stewart.
------------------------------------------------------------------
<<< Note 710.3 by CURIE::TDAVIS >>>
-< This Major's a Payne >-
It'll be the first PGA won in knickers since Sarazan.
|
710.38 | MARR VS. NICKLAUS | SANFAN::GRANT_JO | Don't say `shank' | Mon Aug 14 1989 12:01 | 16 |
| RE: note .35. The commentator who joked about Norman "not knowing
how" to play conservtively was Dave Marr, former PGA champ. Jack
definitely jumped all over Marr, saying something to the effect
that Norman got a bad rap on that issue. I don't know if that is
true or not, but I do think that Nicklaus could have expressed his
disagreement more diplomatically, particularly considering the fact
that Marr's comment was really said with affection. I didn't get
a sense of him making a serious comment about Norman's game.
By the way, Nicklaus, who is my all-time favorite golf hero, is
showing signs of an unbecoming arrogance. For instance - he is
on record that he will only play Senior PGA Tour events (possibly
excepting the Open) held on Nicklaus-designed courses. The Senior
Tour is frantically trying to accommodate him. Nicklaus the golfer
is without peer; Nicklaus the guy has feet of clay.
|
710.39 | More tea vicar? | SQGUK::NOCK | Life in the Bus lane | Mon Aug 14 1989 12:42 | 9 |
| Anyone else catch Curtis' outburst on 12 (?) when the gallery disturbed
him? His 8 iron hit some branches and crept onto the front edge,
at which he glared at the sidelines and said something uncomplementary,
like "son of a .....". TV tried to cut the ..... but it was pretty
obvious what he was saying.
Just shows they're as human as us when we hit a bad one (the language
gets fruity). Hasn't Curtis been "caught" before doing this? (BTW
I don't hold it against him)
|
710.40 | Curtis Strange's bad choice of verbs! | BLKWDO::MORTON | | Mon Aug 14 1989 12:58 | 7 |
| A personal note about Curtis Stranges' profanity on being disturbed on
his approach shot. I think a man of his stature, and certainly a pro-
fessional golfer for many years, could control his choice of words in
front of millions of people. After all, this show is watched my lots
of young futire golfers that look up to the pros for guidance and
inspiration. Curtis has bben playing for many years in front of noisy
galleries, and he's being paid handsomely for it.
|
710.41 | good call | BTOVT::HOGANP | | Mon Aug 14 1989 16:24 | 7 |
|
re .24 good call!!!!!!!!!
|
710.42 | does smoking on the course bother you?? | BUSY::SWANEY | is this the other side of Paradise?? | Mon Aug 14 1989 16:25 | 18 |
|
That's funny you should mentioned that to me . I really don't
have a problem with that because im a fan of many other sports which
have a lot of outburts. What bother me and it was only a split second
view because the abrutly took it off the screen. Is after Ian Woosnam
(a golfer i Like) started smoking a FAG(british for Cigarette I
don't smoke but so it's tough to have a fair opion about this. I
know it bothers to be teeing off with an awful stench of a cigar.
I once golfed with this guy smoking a pipe while he hit his shots.
BS
Did any one see the Red Sox this weekend the had the microphone
near a bunch of people yelling MARGO MARGO MARGO when Boggs was
up at bat
|
710.43 | Curtis's Outburst | EXPRES::MARRA | | Tue Aug 15 1989 14:27 | 8 |
| Curtis Strange's outburst did indeed bother me!! As I understood it,
the people causing the "commotion" were opening umbrellas because it
had started to rain. Shame on those people! They paid their admission
fee to get wet didn't they?? Anyway, it makes Curtis look pretty small
when Mike Reid comes off the 18th after losing the tournament and gives
Payne Stewart a "high-five" and appears VERY gentalmenly!!!! Now that
is sportsmanship!! Maybe Curtis should take a lesson in controlling
his disappointment/frustrations from Mike Reid!!!!!
|
710.44 | So What? | CLSTR1::VARLEY | | Tue Aug 15 1989 16:16 | 20 |
| I saw it a little differently. First, as Strange was setting up
to hit, there was a lot of motion/noise off to his right. he backed
off and said, "Give me a Break"! Then, when he hit the shot, he
expressed his displeasure (normally, albeit a bit strongly for tender
ears) thusly: "Goddammit! Son of a Bitch!" I'll bet the Tv mikes
picked it up a lot more clearly than anyone in the vicinity to Strange
did.
Listen to the athletes in any other sport and compare them to tour
pro's. Then, listen to the FANS at any other sport (been to a Pats
or Celts game recently ?). Compared to this, it's no big deal. Sure,
he cussed under a lot of stress, but no "magic words", and only
once. How many of us could pass that test when the wheels come off
when we play? Let's put this in perspective and not make a mountain
out of a molehill; these guys are under a microscope all the time
as it is. If I'm wrong, Strange will be fined, and we'll hear about
it, and if I'm right, he won't. In the larger scheme of things,
it just doesn't matter; Curtis Strange is still o.k. with me, even
if he's human.
--Jack
|
710.45 | Clarification | CLSTR1::VARLEY | | Tue Aug 15 1989 16:18 | 5 |
| Further to .44, Strange was beefing about his shot, not at someone.
--Jack.
|
710.46 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Aug 15 1989 16:28 | 6 |
|
re .44
Good interpretation. I concur.
Mike
|
710.47 | go ahead and scream... | PARITY::RANDERSON | | Tue Aug 15 1989 17:04 | 22 |
| One thing I always found interesting about golf, (tennis, bowling too):
Why does it have to be so quiet before the contestant makes his play?
You can answer concentration but how can it be any harder to
concentrate in golf than for any other sport? Ever try to hit a 90+
mph fastball while 50-60 thousand people are screaming at you? Or sink
a foul shot while everybody you see through the glass backboard is
waving their arms at you? It seems like it should be easier to hit a
stationary ball, especially if you keep your head down, ;^). I always
observe golf etiquette on the course, ie. stay quiet and motionless
while others are playing a stroke, but I don't mind if others don't
while I'm playing mine. Maybe I'm not good at concentrating anyway, at
least my scores seem to indicate this, 8-P. It's just my opinion but I
think that a lot of golfers are too sensitive about an issue that a
good athlete should be able to overcome.
Ron
|
710.48 | Just Golf Tradition | HOTDOG::CANEDO | | Tue Aug 15 1989 18:07 | 14 |
| "CBS Sunday Morning" did a piece on just this issue a few months back.
Essentially they were asking the same questions - why does it have to
be quiet to hit a stationary golf ball yet baseball players can hit a
moving object with thousands screaming?
They spoke with several players and golf officials and all of them
basically came up with the same answer - because that's golf's
tradition. Several of the player - Jack Nicklas is the only one I
remember for sure - said that if they were to get rid of the quiet it
wouldn't take too long for players to adjust to it. However, they also
pointed out that if they are expecting quiet and there is sudden noise
as they start their swing, it is startling, ruining their swing.
-Bob C.
|
710.49 | | ENGINE::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Tue Aug 15 1989 18:22 | 28 |
| RE: -.1
> "CBS Sunday Morning" did a piece on just this issue a few months back.
> Essentially they were asking the same questions - why does it have to
> be quiet to hit a stationary golf ball yet baseball players can hit a
> moving object with thousands screaming?
Possible answers include:
a. Because baseball players don't have to go into to the stands
to play their foul balls. ;-)
b. Because except for a handful of stadiums in baseball the
players are significantly separated from the fans. Only golf
lets you get so close to the action.
c. Maybe because golf fans don't appreciate the boorish behaviour
of beer filled fans chanting "Less filling!" "Tastes Great".
d. All of the above & more.
Personally I don't think that fans not being able to cheer during shots is a
big draw back. In fact I think that the tension and suspense are heightened
as the entire 18th hole goes silent waiting for someone like Mike Reid to
try to sink a birdie putt for a playoff.
Just my opinion,
Larry
|
710.50 | shhsh shhhs on the tee someone needs to breathe! | BUSY::SWANEY | is this the other side of Paradise?? | Wed Aug 16 1989 09:25 | 22 |
|
This topic is so ironic , because I saw a comedian the other
night do a little skit on growing up playing certain sports. One thing
he mentioned is while playing baseball your allowed to yell at the
hitter while he trying to swing. And when comes to Basketball they
(the fans) might be even closer to the action than most golf galleries
and they do more than yell, they have huge signs made out of sheets
they have small air horns going off at his release of a shot.
it's just funny how much they differ some sports.
back to that comedian he began to say how the coach told them when
there in the feild they needed to produce some "chatter' like hey
batter hey batter hey batter swing batter. he went on to say how
much fun the boring tv golf would be if you had some guy kneeling
on the green yelling at someone putting hey putter putter hey putter
big swing and a mis wiffer he's big wiffer it was a riot to see
him do this
just a comment
BS
|
710.51 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Wed Aug 16 1989 10:50 | 28 |
| I think it comes down to what your used to. It's what you expect.
In golf when your out there it's generally quiet. I's the nature
of where courses are and the like. In baseball you get acclimated
to the noise. In golf you get acclimated to the quiet. Think of
making that foul shot when the areana is completely quiet. I bet
it's harder than when there is noise. The reverse is the same in
golf. If you went out and played a round with a walkman on your
head I bet that within a few holes you would shut it out and start
shooting the same.
I know that your sences can get "overloaded". By this I mean that,
have you ever walked into a room and smelled an odor but after awhile
you can't smell it any more? Try it! Close your eyes and have someone
put an onion under your nose. You'll smell it but continue and try
and determine when the remove the onion. After a few seconds you'll
stop smelling the onion and think for sure that they've removed
the onion. in reality they onion will still be under your nose buy
the sensors within your nose get overloaded and can't smell the
onion. I'd assume that this is the same think that can happen to
your hearing. In baseball or any other sport where noise is the
norm you get acclimated to it and you sences stop hearing it. If
all of a sudden everyone was quite I bet that would break your
concentration. The same would probably be true in golf except that
it's the quiet you expect to hear and it's the abrupt noise that
is then the distraction.
Tom
|
710.52 | solitude!!!!!! | BUSY::SWANEY | is this the other side of Paradise?? | Wed Aug 16 1989 12:55 | 11 |
|
I do very often go out by myself with a walkman and play it doesn't
seem to hurt at all it tends to relax me and take my mind of the
bad shot i just hit or if im getting to focussed on the next shot.
i would very often bowl during league with my walkman , funny the
main reason is shut out all the yelling and chatter.
try you might like it.
BS
|
710.53 | because golf is a mental game | MLTVAX::ARMSTRONG | | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:16 | 29 |
| With all the talk in this notes file about what a mental game
golf is, I'm a little surprised to see that people think the
quiet is just a matter of etiquette. It had to start somewhere,
right? What was the reason for it back then?
I for one totally loose my concentration when I'm trying to
putt and the other people in your group are chattering. For
me it doesn't have anything to do with being surprised by
noise when I was expecting quiet; it's simply that I'm really
concentrating about making a good shot, and the noise totally
interferes.
A few notes back someone noted that Curtis cussed at his shot
and not because the fans made noise. I disagree (respectfully,
of course). I was watching and I he was *glaring* at the crowd.
I thought he would walk over to who he thought made the noise
and give em a black eye. I like Curtis and was hoping he would
pull through, but I was a little disappointed by his reaction
to the crowd.
I'm as quick to use swear words when I make a bad shot, but
I think the situation is entirely different and can't be compared
with how the pros should react in front of millions of people.
If I was playing in the club championship, for example, which
draws many members in just to watch, I would be a lot more careful
about how I reacted to bad shots in front of everyone.
Only my humble opinion.
PA
|
710.54 | there should be some responsibility | ESPN::BLAISDELL | Live from Messachusetts | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:45 | 19 |
|
> I'm as quick to use swear words when I make a bad shot, but
> I think the situation is entirely different and can't be compared
> with how the pros should react in front of millions of people.
> If I was playing in the club championship, for example, which
> draws many members in just to watch, I would be a lot more careful
> about how I reacted to bad shots in front of everyone.
I agree entirely with this. There should be a sense of
responsibility about what is said if front of many people as
opposed to a few (that you know). I'll cuss with the best of them
over a bad shot, unless I'm playing in front of a gallery, then
I would shrug and give my best Jimmy Carter smile. Fortunately,
with my play lately, I don't get to play in front of galleries
at all.
From what was told to me about Curtis's outburst, I would say
the expletive he used was rather mild. Anyone seen a hockey game?
His glaring at the spectators would bother me more.
|
710.55 | PGA REVISITED | BOGUSS::COOPER | MAD HACKER | Wed Aug 16 1989 13:55 | 17 |
| Curtis Strange has always been a very emotional player and
until just the last few years wasn't very good at hiding
those feelings. I think he may be feeling a little frustrated
this year even with repeating at the Open because he just
can't seem to get it going for any length of time. Also, I
think he deserves a fine from the PGA for his behavior. Other
sports personalities get fined for acting up during competitions
so why should golfers be any different. My biggest beef is with
all the pro's they show smoking during the course of a round!!
It seems like every time I watch a tournament now there will be
several times that they show players having a ciggarette after a
shot. Is it like sex or something? Have one after a good shot!!
I wish the directors would pay a little more attention to what
their cameramen are filming. One viewers (and reformed smoker)
opinion.
THE MAD HACKER
|
710.56 | sweet swinging Ian | NSG018::STOPERA | | Wed Aug 16 1989 14:46 | 9 |
| re. Curtis Strange - i think he should grow up, the specator didn't
make him miss that shot, he did, he probally has been in that situation
hundreds of times, it's like kicking the dog when your mad at your
wife.
re. Ian Woodsman
what a great swing, i wish us yanks could see more of him, he is
incredible
|
710.57 | pressure + distraction = vented anger | DINSCO::BURKE | Network Management Solutions | Wed Aug 16 1989 15:41 | 22 |
| Curtis is one of my favorite players to watch. I can't blame anyone for
being emotional if that is their style. Some folks are colorful, like
Payne Steward, and others aren't, like Reid. Some are personable like
Rodriguez, Trevino and Palmer, while others are machine-like like Nicklaus,
Crampton and Player. Ben Cranshaw and "The Walrus" always look like they
are complaining. And then there are there are the likes of Ken Green and
Mac O'Grady. Hey, it takes all kinds. From a spectator point-of-view,
I enjoy seeing the emotions -- to borrow a phase, "the thrill of victory,
and the agony of defeat."
Last year, I was standing behind Curtis Strange at the US Open when he
made his approach shot at the 72nd hole (into the bunker). There was a
tremendous surge towards him after he made the shot, and he started
throwing elbows like Kareem. Did anyone see this on TV? A picture of
this, less elbows, appeared in SI entitled "Curtis Strange: A Face in
the Crowd." The crowd control was poor, but there is no excuse for
throwing the elbows [which I think he did because of the poor approach
shot].
Jeff
|
710.58 | My $.02 | STUDIO::PIEL | | Mon Aug 21 1989 13:41 | 24 |
| Hi all,
I just got back from vacation and it looks like I have a lot of
catching up to do. Anyway, I enjoyed the PGA ( what little I saw of
it). I remember going of to supper with Mike Reid ahead with 3 holes
to play. I was stunned to find out at the 11PM news that he had lost.
Curtis has been known as a "hot head" for quite sometime. Over the last
3 or 4 years, he has certainly calmed down. But every so often, he does
lose control. I remember a tournament earlier this year when he had hit
his tee shot way left into a jungle. As he got ready for his second
shot, the commentators couldn't believe Curtis was going to try for the
green. The shot didn't go off as planned and ended up in the trees
about 50 yds. ahead and we were treated to a bararge of profanity.
The same thing happened at PV last year during the second round.
Curtis was sort of half in/half out of the bunker on 10 ( which was his
first hole of the day). He miss hit the shot and proceeded to attack
the spot where the ball had been resting with his club for about 10
seconds and swearing at the bunker.
Ken
|
710.59 | virgin ears? | MJOSWS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Mon Aug 28 1989 15:42 | 8 |
| Really now... how many of you golfers have witnessed a tirade or
thrown one yourself on the course? I know I have been on both sides!
I'm not offended and you probably haven't been either. I don't think
Curtis said anything you, your wife, or children haven't heard at the
mall. I like the emotional players because they are more fun to watch.
I would laugh like h___ it somebody threw a putter in a pond on 18!
Rick
|
710.60 | Curtis's fine made public....... | BTOVT::SMITH_P | Cabs R us....... | Wed Aug 30 1989 12:49 | 14 |
| Just read in the paper that Curtis was in fact fined for his actions....
The report said that fines to players are not usually made public but in this
case Curtis requested that it be made public. He said that he was upset with
a photographer who clicked his shutter when he was addressing the ball and again
in the middle of his backswing. He appologized for the outburst, said that his
adrenaline was really flowing and he lost it.
Oh yeah, the reason he wanted the fine to be publicized is because he wanted his
two sons to see that their father can admit when he was wrong...
IMO the guy's all class.......
Peter_who_wishes_he_had_half_the_talent_Curtis_Strange_has_in_his_little_finger
|
710.61 | Classy Guy | MLTVAX::ARMSTRONG | | Fri Sep 01 1989 13:25 | 4 |
| Glad to hear about Curtis' public apology. Thanks for sharing this
information. Way to go Curtis!
Patti
|
710.62 | 2� | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Fetchez la vache | Mon Oct 09 1989 13:31 | 15 |
| Been away for awhile and thought I'd comment on the quiet vs noise discussion.
I have to disagree with Patti, that its necessary because golf is a mental
game. Every sport is a mental game. From experience with the sports I play,
pitching or hitting a baseball requires intense concentration and focus, the
same with Basketball. The screaming and yelling, air horns, etc., become just a
background blur.... almost like white noise. I just started playing golf last
year, and am not especially good at it, but I'm improving. Since it is the
tradition, and a perceived courtesy to be quiet while others are preparing to
swing, I am quiet. However, it does not bother me in the least whether others
are noisy while I'm hitting, or whether they are quiet when I'm hitting.
However I have noticed that an abrupt change from one to the other is
disconcerting (usually this is a noisy situation, then people notice you're
about to swing, and a deathly silence falls....... Say HUH!)
MIKE JN
|