T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
569.1 | slow play | EMASS::MURPHY | Dan Murphy @ OFO | Wed Apr 05 1989 16:54 | 26 |
| I can't explain why the men behind you acted the way they did (I
wasn't there).
Let me address some points in your note, though. Because the
pace of play on a course is slow, this does not mean your pace
of play should match that pace. You should still play quickly
even if the group in front of you is slow. If they see you waiting
on every shot, maybe they will get the message to speed up their
play. (Maybe the men behind you felt you were overly slow while
putting - remember, they were out in the fairway (or tee?) waiting
to hit while you were playing).
Golf is supposed to be a relaxing game. This does not mean you
should have to wait 10 minutes between every shot. Nor does it
mean a round of golf should take six hours. This is not my idea
of relaxation.
Remember, the Games biggest problem today is SLOW PLAY. Let's
speed the game up and still make it enjoyable.
Hit 'em straight,
Dan
N.B. Pam, please don't take this note as a criticism of your play,
I just wanted to make a few points.
|
569.2 | | DOUBLE::DM_JOHNSON | Morality curtails entertainment | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:12 | 16 |
| Two points
1) Can't really tell from .0 why the threesome was upset. I might
ask the question whether the rude response by your husband was
preceeded by a conversation about the slow play and why the upset.
2) I can't agree with .1. If two groups in front of you are backed
up it makes no sense to harrass the group immediately in front of
you. It just shows a lack of maturity. I don't enjoy slow play either
but generally the group immediately in front of me is not the problem.
Jamming up the back of the group in front of you doesn't help anything
if they are not the problem. Matching the pace of the group in front
of you does not slow the play down.
Dj
|
569.3 | | EMASS::MURPHY | Dan Murphy @ OFO | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:32 | 14 |
| re: .1 and .2
My implication was that the group in front was holding up play.
Sorry for the non-clarity.
I have to disagree with your "matching the pace" of play quote.
I feel this leads to overall slow play on a course. "Why should
I play quickly, everyone else is going slow." I don't agree with
this mentality.
There is nothing wrong with being ready to hit (putt) when it is your
turn, taking five practice swings before every shot, quickly moving
off a green to the next tee when you are finished with a hole, waving
up on par 3's, etc
|
569.4 | correction | EMASS::MURPHY | Dan Murphy @ OFO | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:42 | 11 |
| Sorry, I posted the last reply too quickly, some corrections:
> turn, taking five practice swings before every shot, quickly moving
this should say "taking only one practice swing before a shot"
Following guidelines for fast play is not a sign of immaturity and
does not cause "jamming up behind the group in front".
Dan
|
569.5 | | BAGELS::MATSIS | | Wed Apr 05 1989 17:52 | 30 |
| I don't think the group in the front was causing the slow play.
I just think it was the amount of groups on the course and who
knows which one was causing the slow play (which actually was quite
quick if you ask me). I could see that the group in front of us
was keeping up with the group in front of them and so on and so
on. Nobody appeared to by goofing off. It just seemed like the
course was at capacity and people were going as quickly as possible.
As far as the rude response from my husband, they deserved it.
They were VERY obnoxious. They didn't kindly yell to ask if the
could play through (which they wouldn't have gone anywhere anyway).
They were screaming like they were pi**ed off at the world and that
there should be nobody on the course but them. They NEVER caught
up to us when we were teeing off so it couldn't have been that
slow. I mean what are you supposed to do. As long as you are keeping
up to the group in front of you, shooting when ready, getting off
the green as quickly as possible. Is this a big race to see who
gets to the clubhouse first.
I totally understand people not wanting to wait around every time
it's there turn to swing. We have had twosomes come up behind
us and we gladly ask them if they would like to play through.
Even if we are a 4-some at the first tee we will as a 2some to
play before us if they would like. Let's face it, 2 people can
play twice as fast as 4 can. I just don't understand some jerks
like the ones behind us. We weren't holding them up and there
is no need to be so rude. It almost ruined a great day, but then
again I don't let people like that get to me too much.
Pam
|
569.6 | Turtling Along | MTWAIN::F_MCGOWAN | | Thu Apr 06 1989 08:08 | 19 |
| What's really a drag is to have some super-aggressive idiots in
back of you who try to get you to speed it up by hitting while you're
still within their range; while you're standing on the fairway waiting
for Moe, Larry, Curly and Shemp to finish plumb-bobbing their 3-inch
putts and get off the green.
I've finally come to the realization that as long as people are allowed
to go onto a golf course with no more qualification than the greens
fees, slow play is inevitable. It takes only one group to destroy
everyone's tempo. The worst thing you can do is to pay too much
attention to it. You'll really ruin your day if you fret and fume
about the clowns ahead of you, even if you're justified. Until every
public course hires rangers to keep things moving, we're going to
have to tolerate the turtles. I once walked off a course after 12
holes in 4.5 hours, went to the clubhouse and got a refund on the
back 9...if we all did that, maybe something would be done?
Frank
|
569.7 | My 2 cents worth | RATTLE::TLAPOINTE | | Thu Apr 06 1989 09:31 | 14 |
| RE: all previous;
The previous note and replys are just an example of why all
public golf courses should have appropiate personal monitoring play.
If a Marshall would've been out on the course the individuals who
were being obnoxious would've been asked to straighten out or leave.
This is why so many of the new courses being built in N.E. are
going to be private or semi-private at most, even though the price
may be high you know you'll be able to play an enjoyable round of
golf and not have to worry if "Larry, Darryl & Darryl" are behind
you ruing your game.
Tony
|
569.8 | Another Idea | BOSHOG::VARLEY | | Thu Apr 06 1989 11:00 | 15 |
| What the bozos behind you should have done was walk up to you on
a tee and say "Excuse me, we seem to be playing a bit faster, would
you mind if we play through? We'll let you hit up on the par threes,
and please hit away any time we're out of range". Then, even if
you don't think they can go any where, a confrontation is avoided,
and, if you wish, you can let 'em play through. We asked some guys
at Stow once, and they said, "if we let you through (this was on
#14 North) we'll have to wait for you" (Earth to Bozo...). Anyway,
they were on 17 fairway while we were working on our second beer
in the clubhouse.
I firmly believe that if everyone knew what they were doing, you
could have a 4-some on every tee, fairway and green and play in
4 hrs or less with no waiting.
--The Skoal Bandit
|
569.9 | water water everywhere | OTOO01::JAY | | Thu Apr 06 1989 13:00 | 9 |
| to all of you.
golf is a terrific game that you have to play relaxed. I'm not sure
if it is all that relaxing a game however.
slow play is a problem at most of the public courses here in Canada
as well. Regardless of the numbers of marshalls or even if you have
crossover tee times an outing will stretch beyond 5 hours at most
courses.
Don't worry Be happy!! you're on the course we aren't yet
|
569.10 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu Apr 06 1989 15:17 | 10 |
|
If someone comes up to me and asked to play through, I'm usually
more then willing to let them play. I usually play pretty fast,
but I'll still let them play. However if some joker decides to hit
his ball down the fairway while I'm still in range, I feel this
is a mistake, so I just hit his ball back to him. 8*) Then of course
if he feels inclined to come to "Talk" to me about it, he better
bring along his two buddies also.
Mike
|
569.11 | | BAGELS::MATSIS | | Thu Apr 06 1989 15:49 | 11 |
| Mike, I love your way of handling the jerks. My husband is pretty
big so maybe I should give it a try.
Pam
ps. Just kidding. I wouldn't dare. The game is a GREAT sport
and I refuse to sink to their level. It still sounds like a good
idea. I'd love to see their face when their ball comes flying
back.
|
569.12 | Are we the problem or the victim? | BOSTON::MURPHY | Dormie | Thu Apr 06 1989 16:02 | 82 |
| I happen to believe that the real problem might actually be the
owners/managers of the golf courses - especially the public tracks.
The numbers are fairly easy to understand:
Length of golfing day = apx. 14 hours (peak)
Length of round = apx. 4 hours (I wish)
Effective day length = 10 hours
Given these assumptions lets look at the possibilities:
Tee Time
Interval Groups/Hour Golfers/Hour Total Golfers Percent
========================================================================
12 min. 5 20 200 --
10 min. 6 24 240 +20%
8 min. 7.5 30 300 +50%
=======================================================================
Granted these numbers do not represent any scientific study but
do indicate that a golf course could increase its capacity if it
were able to decrease the intervals between tee times (SPEED UP
PLAY).
This would be welcomed news to those of us who compete weekly for
a decent time at a course.
But what is the incentive for the golf course?
I can't think of any. Why should a course owner try to put more
people through his/her course? Why should they try to push up to
50% more golfers through and cause more wear and tear on the course
when they don't have to do it?
Face it - they have a captive audience. Where else are you going
to go?
Even jumping from the standard 12 minute interval to ten minutes
just yields them a 20% increase. That's real simple. You may have
noticed that the greens fees at your favorite track have increased.
(Let's say that it started out at $20 + 20% = $24?) They have instantly
answered the problem of increased revenue without increased wear.
Add to this the fact that if they don't 'really' care about the
problem and try to rectify it then they don't have to worry about
the hassles involved with inviting S-L-O-W players to leave the
course. The marshals that most courses put out there do little more
than watch play and find golf balls (when they aren't fast asleep
in their carts).
Sorry - I may be flaming but take this example:
On a sunny weekend last year we were fortunate enough to obtain
a tee time a Poquoy Brook in Lakeville. Unfortunately we were booked
right behind a foursome of boobs who had every intention of relaxing
their way to a six hour round. When we made the turn in over three
hours I made it my mission to address the problem with the owner
whom I have known for many years. To my surprise he lagged beside
us as we played #10 and witnessed every act but the juggling elephants
as the circus made its endless way up the fairway. Twenty minutes
later the group finished the hole and the owner announced 'no problem',
wheeled his cart around and sped off in the direction of the clubhouse.
I think we have an issue of concern here - only the golfers are
the one's who are concerned with slow play. It should be the
responsibility of all of us to do those little, time-saving things
that 'subtract' up to a relaxed four hour round.
In the defense of one public course - The Captains in Brewster -
let me say that they appear to follow a different policy and push
a lot of foursomes through the course on any day. I played the course
three times last year and found that the course just couldn't handle
the wear and was in pitiful shape by early afternoon. So maybe slow
play is the salvation - at least of our courses.
|
569.13 | my 2� | AZTECH::BILLINGSLEA | Mark \ DTN:522-5317 | Thu Apr 06 1989 17:33 | 18 |
| I'm not a fast player or a slow player, therefore I haven't had much of
problem with this type of thing. However, whenever I'm being pushed by
a group, I let them play through (usually on the next par 3). If I'm
waiting on a group, I usually try and play through them (usually on the
next par 3).
One time we were following a foursome that was very slow. We got up to
them and asked if we could play through. They said, "Why, the group in
front of us is playing slow too." I said, "Fine, when we catch up to
them we'll ask to play through them too." We played through and never
did catch up with the group in front of them.
Anyway, I don't mind having people play through me (as long as they're
not hitting on to the green while I'm on it, or something like that),
and I don't see why people get upset when I want to play through them.
All this says is that I play at a different pace.
+- Mark
|
569.14 | | BAGELS::MATSIS | | Thu Apr 06 1989 17:49 | 24 |
| Come to think of it, I only played Pelham C.C. one other time which
was last fall. The problem was exactly the opposite. There is
a sign which states ABSOLUTELY NO 5-somes. No I imagine that this
is a known rule at 99% of the courses. Well there was a group of
5 teenager boys (around 18) that payed for 2 and 3 and then teamed
up together as soon as they got out of site of the coutry club.
We patiently waited and waited and waited and waited .............
On the 3rd hole one of them passed us and said "Hope you guys
have a LOT of time on your hands today" and cracked up laughing.
We were kind of surprised at his comment and just looked at him
as he walked away. Well this kept going on and on and finally my
husband asked them if they could hurry it up a little (as they were
all standing on the green trying to add up their scores and having
a good old time. This finally got them to move along and we didn't
have a problem after that.
Looks like there is the same problem with golf courses as there
is with the ski resorts.
OVER CROWDED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pam
|
569.15 | Use common sense, and golf ettiquete | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Fri Apr 07 1989 08:53 | 29 |
| A couple of comments. One, I've at times been asked by the
group behind us, which usually has less players than mine, if they
could play thru. If I think it is a reasonable request, I'm more
than happy to accomadate them. But there are those groups who as
people have said, are obnoxious, rude and really a pain, and then
have the nerve to come up and ask if they can play thru. Nuff said
about that.
As far as hitting a guys ball back to him/her when they hit
into you, I would not do it. Besides the fact that it will probably
end up in a violent situation, there could be a number of reasons
for it, that may not be excusable, but at least may not have been
intentional. I played one time, where on the 1st tee at East Mountain
CC in Westfield Mass., the starter who happened to be the club pro,
was pushing groups off the 1st tee. It was early in the season,
and it was my 1st time playing that year. The hole is a short par
4, about 280 yds, and there was a group just walking onto the green
when the guy told me to go ahead and hit. I expressed my concern
about reaching the green, and he said "B.S., you'll never drive
the green, just go ahead and hit. I did, and rolled my 3 wood to
4 feet from the hole, and the ball went right thru one of the guys
legs who was standing on the green. When we got to the green, the
guy gave me the nastiest look, and simply said, you could have yelled
fore, and you shouldn't have hit anyway. I told him, we all yelled
fore, and you guys never moved, and that the Pro had made me tee
off, or not play. Anyway, he beleived me as the Pro was the same
way when he teed off. He didn't hit the ball back at me, which
just would have made the entire situation worse.
Beak
|
569.16 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Fri Apr 07 1989 10:50 | 14 |
| Rudeness on a golf course is never (well, almost never)
appropriate. Unfortunately, being rude to someone who acts rudely
tends only to make the problem worse. If at all possible, the
best way to handle rude golfers is to ignore them and/or bring
their actions to the attention of the ranger or course management.
If you are playing in a slow group, letting people play through
is ***NOT*** a good solution. The group that has played through
will play faster, but everyone else on the golf course is still
slowed down. If you're in a slow group, the right thing to
do is to encourage the group to get their mind on the matter
at hand and move along more quickly.
--Mr Topaz
|
569.17 | 4 1/2 hour rounds or less - Please | FILTER::PIEL | | Fri Apr 07 1989 13:59 | 17 |
| I agree with .15. I usually play at a fairly quick pace. One of
the game's biggest problems is slow play. Six hour rounds are one
of the reasons why I rarely play on the weekends. Yes, I appreciate
those who let my group play through, but consider this for a moment,
if your in a group and the third or fourth foursome has to play
through you, then your group is playing too slow.
I wish I had the magical solution to slow play, but a variety of
little things contribute to the problem. Some of them are taking
too many practice swings, excessive time lining up a putt, always
being in the woods, etc. I cannot understand why folks cannot finish
a round in 4 1/2 hours max.
I wonder if slow play is more of a problem on public courses than
on private ones. Anybody care to speculate ?
Ken
|
569.18 | slow play | CGVAX2::BRADSHAW | | Fri Apr 07 1989 14:17 | 4 |
| At private (or clubs which allow members only on weekends) slow
play is usually less of a problem because you have to associate
and see fellow members (and the pro) on a regular basis. This peer
pressure usually does the trick.
|
569.19 | | HEFTY::TENEROWICZT | | Fri Apr 07 1989 14:40 | 14 |
| Slow play caused by play out of or into the woods is normal. Hell
we've all been there before and will be there again.
I think that most slow play that happens and can be eliminated is
because some people don't think about the next shot until it's their
turn in the rotation. They are on the course but not concentrating
on what they are going to do next. Most times they wait until it's
their turn before they begin to comtemplate what club to hit. Rather
than being ready.
Tom
|
569.20 | WELL SPACED START TIMES | BOGUSS::COOPER | | Fri Apr 07 1989 14:57 | 8 |
| IN RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMENT ABOUT THE INTERVAL BETWEEN START TIMES.
TWELVE MINUTES MAY BE STANDARD IN YOUR AREA BUT AT ALL OF THE COURSES
I PLAY (public tracks) HERE, THE STANDARD INTERVAL IS SEVEN OR EIGHT
MINUTES. THE COURSE WOULD SURE SEEM EMPTY IF WE COULD HAVE THOSE
TWELVE MINUTE STARTS!!! STILL ONLY TAKES 4.5 TO 5 HOURS TO PLAY
A ROUND THOUGH. I DO LOVE TO PLAY A ROUND!!!
THE MAD HACKER
|
569.21 | | HEFTY::TENEROWICZT | | Fri Apr 07 1989 15:07 | 14 |
| Becker,
I think one problem with East Mountain is the length
of the first and the tenth holes. I think it's always best to has
both these hole be valid par fours. It's a lot easier for four
individuals to walk up and play four second shots while you wait
then have then putt out as would be the case on a par three or
have the potential of driving the hole. In the case of East mountain
it's just a case of poor design. Then again if they bunchered the
farway and the front of the green this would cause you to hit a
3 wood,4 wood or iron off of the tee and would solve the problem.
Tom
|
569.22 | looking for lost balls | ESPN::BLAISDELL | Scuse me while I kiss the sky | Fri Apr 07 1989 15:56 | 25 |
|
9 out of 10 times, slow play is a result of looking for golf
balls. It is exaggerated when the ENTIRE foursome(or group)
looks for one player's ball. Figure the time spent looking for
the ball, the time spent for each player to get back to their
ball and it starts to really add up.
Look at the pros sometimes. Most spend oodles of time lining
up and preparing their shots, yet look at how long it takes them
to play 18 (4 1/2 hours maximum). The difference, they have
forecaddies and marshalls spotting their balls. Zero time is
spent looking for them.
If we as public link golfers, better manage ourselves and the
foursomes we play in (I agree with Mr Topaz), then maybe we can
discover the 4 hour round again. Pay more attention to where
your playing partner(s) hit their shots. No more than 2 players
in one group should be looking for a lost ball at a time. Don't
spend more than a couple of minutes looking for a lost ball.
All the other stuff mentioned is minor in comparison.
-rick
|
569.23 | 3 1/2 hours 88,90,91,93 scores | MJOFS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Mon Apr 10 1989 11:20 | 12 |
| We played 18 in 3 1/2 hours on Saturday, that may be a new record
at our course, we have a marshal and seldom if ever run longer than
4 1/2 hours because they remove you from the course if you hold
things up badly. It is not uncommon for the marshal to hold a group
on the turn to allow 4 groups or more by. This isn't very popular
with greens fee players (that's probably why we have so few!).
Our membership is very well behaved, and knows an awful beating
(read verbal abuse from other members)
will occur if you back up the course.
Rick
|
569.24 | county courses...6 hour norm | MUSKIE::SUZDA | | Mon Apr 10 1989 11:25 | 24 |
| Here at our public course, they stagger the tee times between 6
& 8 minutes. Now, this is a county course, so the manager is in
competition with the rest of the county courses (maybe he gets paid
a commission by beatinfg everyone else). Well, needless to say,
6 hour rounds are the norm here. And, the manager's out there trying
to speed up play (so he can get more people on). I've been waiting
in the clubhouse to play a fast nine in the afternoon, and if the
group doesn't come off the 9th hole in the 6-8 minutes behind the
previous group, the manager will let another foursome tee off on
the tenth between two foursomes. Talk about overloading the course.
On another thought, waving people up on the par three's. Maybe
it's just the overloading of our course, but if we continually wave
people up through the par three's, there is usually one or two
foursomes standing on the next tee waiting to tee off. This usually
results in even slower play.
Everytime I've been invited over to the local country club, it's
been the country club atmosphere of tee off when your ready, play
at your own speed, and there is usually no one playing within 2-4
hole of you.
Tom
|
569.25 | FORE on the green....! | NETWRK::GSMITH | I need two of everything | Mon Apr 10 1989 13:38 | 11 |
| re: back a few
Beak...
4 feet from the hole from 280 yards away! Wow.... Let's face it,
generally speaking, this is a career shot for many... so I feel
the starter SHOULD have got you going...
BTW... did you get your PAR.... :^)
Smitty
|
569.26 | | OBRIEN::KEVIN | Custom Clubs & Repair | Mon Apr 10 1989 13:50 | 20 |
| Set mode/flame = on
I still have to think that one of the major reasons for slow play is
not bad scores. When I was first learning to play 110 was not unusual
but we still finished in under 4 hours. What I've seen is people
taking 4 or 5 practice swings then standing over the ball taking a nap.
Apparently they are thinking of all the things they should do during
the swing (head down, arm straight, eye on the ball and on and on and
on) Then they dribble the shot and go through the ritual again. The
time for all that "thinking" is on the practice tee and not the golf
course. All you really do is fill your mind useless thoughts. I say
step up and hit the SOB before it hits you. The other problem is
lining up the 3 footer for 12. Who the hell cares whether it's 12 or
13! People seem to me to be selfish and rude. They could care less
who they hold up. After all it's THEIR SPACE! (I'll tell them what to
do with their space.)
set mode/flame = off
KO
|
569.27 | Applause | FILTER::PIEL | | Mon Apr 10 1989 14:17 | 3 |
| RE:.26
Couldn't have said it better! Hear, Hear !
|
569.28 | A great way to start that year | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Mon Apr 10 1989 15:10 | 24 |
| I made the putt for Eagle!!! And I honestly doubt that I was
the only one who drove the green that day, or has done it before.
The hole plays as a slight Dogleg left, and if you can draw your
tee shot, you have a fair chance of hitting the green. Especially
on a day where the grass is short and the ground fairly hard, as
it was that day, and usually is at this course. This particular
course, East Mountain C.C., is open almost all year round, and the
owners are just trying to get as many people on and off the course
as posible, which, in my opinion, just ruins your entire day. I
have played there only once since then, and my Aunt is married to
the greens keeper, who is the Son of the owner. I could play for
free just about anytime I wanted to. But I'd rather pay and actually
enjoy myself. The Pro there, another Son of the owner, is really
a very snobby and egotistical person. He didn't beleive I could
drive the green, and even after I did it, he said it was just luck.
Well, while it may not be my normal or average drive, I can hit
them long. He should have respected my concern, and accepted the
fact that there are probably 10,000 golfers in western Mass., who
can out drive him and reach that green.
And Tom, I did hit a 3-wood, not a driver, but you're right
in that the hole should be lengthened, or designed in such a way
as to deter people from trying to drive the green.
Beak
|
569.29 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Apr 10 1989 16:36 | 19 |
|
I play in the Amherst NH league, and my partner and I are usually
the last ones out because we both work the farthest from the course
and are usually the last ones there. What bothers me most are the
idiots behind us (usually a 2-some) wanting to play through. I refuse
to let them play, telling them that this is a league and they'll
have to wait their turn. Complaining to the management is like going
home to cry to moma. Either case will do little good. If an *sshole
is bothering me, I handle it myself. The clubhouse is either too
far away or by the time I get there the jerks will be gone, or the
managment won't do anything anyways. During my golfing career I've
hit about 4 balls back to the *sshole behind me who was trying to
push me along. Only once did one of them walk up to confront me,
but backed down when he realized that I wasn't going to take any
of his *hit. I'm not promoting violence on the golf course, but
sometimes it's the only answer. Unless of course you want to run
home to moma.
Mike
|
569.30 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Mon Apr 10 1989 19:06 | 28 |
| re .29 (MYVAX::DIAMOND):
> What bothers me most are the idiots behind us (usually a 2-some)
> wanting to play through.
From the Rules of Golf, Section I ("Etiquette"):
"In the absence of special rules, two-ball matches should have
precedence over and be entitled to pass any three- or
four-ball match."
And from the same section:
"Any match playing a whole round is entitled to pass a
match playing a shorter round."
Since the Amherst league generally plays in foursomes, the
twosome behind is entitled to play through you. Also, any
It would seem that the people behind you have every right to ask
to play through -- would you like to reconsider calling these
people "idiots", "assholes", and "jerks"?
Instead of getting pissed off, it might be more useful to first
learn the rules, then be more conscious of etiquette, and finally
play with a bit more speed.
--Mr Topaz
|
569.31 | here we go again | MJOSWS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Mon Apr 10 1989 22:06 | 7 |
| Everytime we get on the topic of slow play things get ugly. We
need some positive topics to discuss. I made the mistake of expressing
myself on this issue in this conference before... NEVER again.
What do you think campers? Can we make better use of our conference?
Rick
|
569.32 | sssshhhhhhh... | MSEE::KELLEY | Custom clubs/club repair | Tue Apr 11 1989 09:05 | 11 |
|
I think this is a topic that is of great concern to all of us and
there are varying opinions on the subject. I think that it is
good to discuss all aspects of the problem, it just may help
some people handle the situations better than they might have
without the discussion... And sure some people VERY strong feelings
about avoiding slow play, but lets try to keep the swearing out
of it and keep things down to a dull roar...!
Thanks
Gene (doing some rare moderating)
|
569.33 | | 4873::RASPUZZI | Michael Raspuzzi | Tue Apr 11 1989 09:24 | 23 |
| Re: twilight league & two-somes
A lot of courses I have been playing usually post a sign or a schedule
somewhere that tells everyone what nights they have leagues. The
implied message being that you should not interfere with the league.
It seems kind of silly to me for a twosome to have teed off after a
league has sent all its foursomes out and then expect to play through.
If they play through the last foursome of the league, then what do they
do? Race through everyone else? If I go to a course and they have a
league playing that night, I stay out of the league's way.
When I was a member at Wyantenuck, if you interfered with the men's
twilight league (it's always Tuesday night) you got severely chastised
(and these guys did not pay extra money to play in the twilight
league). The general rule of thumb was you stayed out of their way.
Then again, public courses are very different.
I guess it all depends on how the course management feels this should
be handled. Does Stow Acres ever have a problem of this nature?
IMHO,
Mike
|
569.34 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Tue Apr 11 1989 09:55 | 10 |
| Mike, I agree with you that it serves no purpose for any group to
play through unless there's at least a full hole open in front of
the preceding group. (Incidentally, it's possible that the
twosome might have teed off on the first hole, and then got behind
a league foursome that teed off from the 10th.)
I guess I'd like to see more civility on the course, on the part
of everyone involved.
--Mr Topaz
|
569.35 | Wake up, it's your turn!! | HEIDI::DESROCHERS | SAVVY Good Band * Music * Time | Tue Apr 11 1989 10:12 | 24 |
|
Ok, first off. Yes, Beak can hit the 1st green at East Mt. but
I sincerely doubt that he made the putt !! (heh, heh) I'll bet
he pull hooked it into the stream on 2 besides... Beak, make
sure to let me know when you come up here.
Anyway, I agree with .19. THE MAIN reason for slow play is not
being ready. If you can be near your ball, get ready!! Line up
your putt if you're not in the way. How many times do you hit
the ball and then the next guy is still debating on what club
to hit? If you're halfway aware, you can even take your practice
swing at the same time. So many times I've hit my putt and then
had to watch someone else crouch down and read their putt. Many,
many times this does not need to be the case.
Also, I've heard too many times the comment "I work all week and
I'm in no hurry today". This happened 2 weeks ago at Stowe but
he turned out to be a quick player, thank God.
And... Greg Norman is a pain in the butt!!! Hopefully, he'll
watch a Masters video and hear all the negative comments about
his slow play. A rebuttal would be very interesting.
Tom
|
569.36 | 560 yd. par 5, a 9 iron should do it | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Tue Apr 11 1989 10:42 | 17 |
|
2nd off, the 1st hole at East (pit) Mountain is almost drivable
for .35 on a windy day ! I've hit the bunkers many times !
(9 iron i think, cinderella story from Augusta !)
as for .35 -< Wake up, it's your turn!! >- I've had to wake him
from his nap on his backswing a few times !
anyway, I agree that if the course is reserved for league play then
you stay out of their way, if your behind a league, hit two balls
and get in some quality practice!
I know I would never want to get in the middle of our league if
I didn't have to, thats suicide !!
ace
|
569.37 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Apr 11 1989 12:39 | 10 |
|
Mr Topaz,
At Amherst where I play the leagues have the right of way. This
is a rule at Amherst. If we start letting everyone through we'd
never get done with our league. The first 4 weeks is real rough,
because the sun goes down so early. I can't remember how many times
I've played the 9th and 18th in the dark.
Mike
|
569.38 | leagues dwindle | MJOFS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:16 | 10 |
|
Unfortunatly, (or fortunatly depending on perspective), our club
is gradually eliminating leagues because of slow play. We lost
one because of price and another because the day they want to play
is now used for the PIAA high school league. A vote was taken at
the end of last year and no new leagues will be accepted at our
course, we only have two left. So keep it moving folks, or you
may be without a course!
Rick
|
569.39 | LET'S PLAY GOLF!!! | BOGUSS::COOPER | | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:49 | 13 |
| RE. .17 I don't get to play many private courses so most of my
playing is done on muni's. Most of the year it only takes 4.5
to 5 hours for a round. During the spring however, that time
easily balloons to 5.5 to 6 hours mostly due to the excessive
numbers of players on the course. It seems that most of the slow
play occurs on or near the greens; not putting out, totaling scores
while still on the green, etc. Invariably, the group that is fooling
around on the green, will probably not be very swift at getting
off the next tee either. I don't enjoy rushing around the course
as fast as I can but I try to keep my mind on the task at hand.
IF YOU WANT TO PLAY, COME ON OUT. IF YOU WANT TO FOOL AROUND, GO
TO THE 19TH HOLE INSTEAD!!!
|
569.40 | You have a problem | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:06 | 47 |
| > I play in the Amherst NH league, and my partner and I are usually
> the last ones out because we both work the farthest from the course
> and are usually the last ones there. What bothers me most are the
> idiots behind us (usually a 2-some) wanting to play through. I refuse
> to let them play, telling them that this is a league and they'll
> have to wait their turn. Complaining to the management is like going
> home to cry to moma. Either case will do little good. If an *sshole
> is bothering me, I handle it myself. The clubhouse is either too
> far away or by the time I get there the jerks will be gone, or the
> managment won't do anything anyways. During my golfing career I've
> hit about 4 balls back to the *sshole behind me who was trying to
> push me along. Only once did one of them walk up to confront me,
> but backed down when he realized that I wasn't going to take any
> of his *hit. I'm not promoting violence on the golf course, but
> sometimes it's the only answer. Unless of course you want to run
> home to moma.
>
> Mike
Mike,
I'm sorry you feel this way. I used to be like that when
I was 18 years old, but I grew up. I don't cry to momma, but handle
it in a civilized way. You seem to think the best way to handle
it is with some kind of a confrontation, and hitting balls back
at someone is a violent one. I'm 6 foot 2 inches tall and weigh
about 215 pounds, so I don't really have to be afraid of anyone,
but I still have enough common sense, to realize that hitting the
ball back and contibuting to the possibility of a violent situation,
is nothing less than childish. I can't stop you from expressing
your opinion, you are entitled to it, but I don't have to agree
with it, and I don't. I've had people hit into me before, and I
simply went back to them, or waited for them, and said in a way
that would let them know I wasn't pleased, but still wasn't P.O.ed,
that they could have at least yelled fore or something, and as long
as they said I'm sorry, it won't happen again, I let it go at that.
Not to long ago, there was a group of golfers I read about in
the paper, that were probably a lot like you. One of them is now
dead, after the group behind them, came up to confront them, and
one of them burried a putter in the guys head. Now there is a big
difference between the guy who is dead, and the guy who is serving
a life sentence for killing him, but I wouldn't want to be either
one of them right now. Neither one of them will ever play golf
again!!!
Sorry for the rather lengthy reply.
Beak
|
569.41 | No 4-letter words please | 16BITS::ARMSTRONG | | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:22 | 21 |
| re 569.5
I haven't read through all 40 responses yet, but I think it's
worth mentioning that swearing on the golf course can get you
kicked off that course for good.
I once was nearly hit by a ball coming off of the tee on the
next hole--it came inches from my head--and was not accompanied
by a "FOUR". Well, I was kind-of-upset, and I let a 4-letter
word slip out. Nothing ever came of it but the guy who almost
hit me threatened to turn me in; one of the people in my
group used to run a course with her family and filled me in
about being kicked off the course.
I don't know if there's a written rule somewhere, but if you
are just starting out golfing, it can't hurt to take this
warning under advisement. Besides, responding to the rude
players by swearing back only lowers you to their levels--
you can better get to them by responding with a smile and a wave.
P
|
569.42 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:37 | 20 |
|
I've found that a good look back at a golfer or group who have hit
into you is usually sufficient. If it happens a number of times
I'd say then next step is to wait at the tee and politely ask that
they give you a little more time to move on before they hit. If it
continues, let them play threw. Heck it isn't worth getting hurt
over. At the end of the round see the starter or owner and confront
the offending group. I have seen a group thrown out of the 19th
hole and told never to come back by using this technique. Sometimes
it's tough enough not getting mad over your play let alone getting
mad over someone elses foolish play.
I used to get pretty mad over golf and shots. It made me play worse
and ruined it for everyone. That was a few years ago. Since then
I've takes a different look at my game. I funnel the energy I used
to use getting mad into productive energies trying to assess a shot
and learning from it. I play each shot as a ame in itself. If it's
good or bad I try and learn from the shot and then go on. It's helped
my game and lowered my handicap.
Tom
|
569.43 | | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Tue Apr 11 1989 16:34 | 4 |
| Thats a positive step Tom. Glad to hear it. Good luck with
your continued improvement.
Beak
|
569.44 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Apr 11 1989 16:38 | 22 |
|
re .40
I don't think it's childish to stick up for your rights as a golfer
on a public/private course (which you pay dearly for). If someone
is hitting his golfball at me purposely then this is a violation
of my rights. On the golf courses I use to play when I was a kid
there were a lot of those jerks playing. Asking them politly to
stop - to them is a sign of weakness and the easiest way to get yourself
badly hurt or killed (literly). Most of the time their punk highschool
kids (usually been drinking). If you're the kind of person who lets
other people walk all over you, thats your problem.
Getting someone kicked off a course for life is rediculas. How is
the management going to remember who they kicked off (their face,
doubtfull). At Amherst I've yet to see the same person at the
cash-register 2 times in a row.
What a course needs is marshals throughout the course to stop childish
behavior. However if there isn't anyone then who's going to do it???
Mike
|
569.45 | Grow up please | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Tue Apr 11 1989 16:47 | 11 |
| RE .44
Silly me I forgot about those Punk highschool kids who are
drinking. By all means, if these are the people who have driven
their ball into you, go ahead and smack it right back at them, and
maybe hit one right in the eye. And when they come running up to
you, go ahead and beat the %#@$ out of them. They have no right
to be there anyway!!! Damn punks!!!
Do me a favor, don't come play in Western Mass. Beak
|
569.46 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Apr 11 1989 23:19 | 31 |
|
RE .45
I suggest you reread my previous replies. You'll note that no where
did I mention any use of violence nor did I advocate the use of
any violence. If this is the way you try to win an argument by making
up things as you go along, I suggest you graduate up to first grade.
When some jerk is bothering you on a course you have one of 4 things
to do.
. Do nothing, and hope thy'll stop.
. Tell management, and hope they'll do something.
. Politely ask them to stop and hope they don't beat your brains
in.
. Lastly, confront them and hopefully they don't beat your brains
in.
It is of my experience (and the neighborhood I grew up in I've had
a lot) that the best way to stop the jerks from harassing you and
to keep you from getting killed is to confront them. If you don't
have the stomic for I suggest you do nothing, and just let them
ruin your golf game. Because politely asking jerks or telling
management will just p*ss them off, and is the easiest way to start
something. If someone pushes you and you don't push back, then they'll
just keep pushing. This psyco kid I new played golf, and wouldn't
hesitate to hit a ball at you. If you politely asked him to stop,
he'd beat your brains in; if you told management he'd wait by your
car, then beat your brains in, but if you confronted him he'd back
of because he respected that (about the only thing in this world
he did respect was power).
|
569.47 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Wed Apr 12 1989 07:58 | 10 |
| Thank GOD it's a free country and each persons opinion is equally
protected.
Mr Diamond,
I don't agree with you. Confrontation never solved anything
but leads to further confrontation.... I'm not going to bother to
continue this reply, You won't be convinced.
Tom
|
569.48 | My last on the subject | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Wed Apr 12 1989 08:17 | 57 |
| ================================================================================
Note 569.10 What the heck is the rush for? 10 of 47
MYVAX::DIAMOND "No brag, Just fact." 10 lines 6-APR-1989 14:17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If someone comes up to me and asked to play through, I'm usually
more then willing to let them play. I usually play pretty fast,
but I'll still let them play. However if some joker decides to hit
his ball down the fairway while I'm still in range, I feel this
> is a mistake, so I just hit his ball back to him. 8*) Then of course
> if he feels inclined to come to "Talk" to me about it, he better
> bring along his two buddies also.
================================================================================
Note 569.29 What the heck is the rush for? 29 of 39
MYVAX::DIAMOND "No brag, Just fact." 19 lines 10-APR-1989 15:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I play in the Amherst NH league, and my partner and I are usually
the last ones out because we both work the farthest from the course
and are usually the last ones there. What bothers me most are the
idiots behind us (usually a 2-some) wanting to play through. I refuse
to let them play, telling them that this is a league and they'll
have to wait their turn. Complaining to the management is like going
home to cry to moma. Either case will do little good. If an *sshole
is bothering me, I handle it myself. The clubhouse is either too
far away or by the time I get there the jerks will be gone, or the
> managment won't do anything anyways. During my golfing career I've
> hit about 4 balls back to the *sshole behind me who was trying to
> push me along. Only once did one of them walk up to confront me,
> but backed down when he realized that I wasn't going to take any
> of his *hit. I'm not promoting violence on the golf course, but
> sometimes it's the only answer. Unless of course you want to run
> home to moma.
Mike
Mike,
I've included a few of your replies to this topic, and if they
don't suggest violence, then I guess I made a mistake, and I'll
apologize for that. But it seems to me that saying he better bring
his 2 buddies along, doesn't mean so they can moderate the
discussion!!! And also saying I'm not promoting violence on the
course, but sometimes it's the only answer, also doesn't backup
your case very well.
Did you ever stop to think, that when a player has hit a ball
into you, that it could have been unintentional? Where as your
hitting it back at them, is intentional, and in my opinion, is a
crime. You are intentionaly committing an act that could severely
injure and possibly Kill another human being. Also, again, in my
opinion, you are the childish one.
Beak
|
569.49 | Generally a stern look back will suffice. | WORDS::NISKALA | Margo pulled a groin muscle. Whos? | Wed Apr 12 1989 08:52 | 6 |
| Hey c'mon Beak and Mike. This is starting to sound like the
SPORTS note file with all this abusive point/counterpoint. Golfers
are passive people, right? Except for the person who imbedded his
putter into someone elses skull.
Keith
|
569.50 | On the ahem..lighter side | ESPN::BLAISDELL | Anything you need...you got it! | Wed Apr 12 1989 09:06 | 6 |
|
What we need is......
ROBOGOLFER
|
569.51 | I apologize | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Hope my little world will last... | Wed Apr 12 1989 09:22 | 7 |
| Sorry, if it sounds like something out of the SPORTS note.
I didn't intend that at all. I just cannot and will not advocate
hitting a ball at another golfer/group intentionally, and if my
views/opinions on this discourage even 1 golfer from doing that,
than I feel they're worth voicing.
Beak
|
569.52 | WHAT HAVE I GOTTEN INTO!! | SLSTRN::GOULD | | Wed Apr 12 1989 09:55 | 7 |
| Holy Cow, I just took up the game, only played 3 times in my life and
all in the last 2 weeks, after reading this note I am scared to go out
there!! Wonder if I can find my darts, no one ever threw a dart back at
me that I can remember, sounds like a safer game.....
Roy
|
569.53 | Threat Assessment | SHRFAC::BRUNDIGE | Earth First | Wed Apr 12 1989 09:57 | 19 |
| Sounds like a rathole to me. :^)
I think we're talking about confrontations. But don't they
depend on WHOM we're confronting? If they're 4 teenage punks
we approach them one way if they're 4 middle aged women we
would approach them another way. I don't agree with hitting
the ball back at them but my "discussion" with the teenagers
would be direct and to the point, whereas my discussion with
the women would start out a bit different.
I don't think Mike would drive a ball back at the women, and
I'm sure a number of us know how to approach 4 jerks. Ie; With
a smile, an, I'm sure you made a mistake, and, if you do it again
I'll put my driver in an appropriate spot. Again depending on they're
stance, demeaner, attitude, looks, etc.
Assess the situation and common sense.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
Russ
|
569.54 | Fact of life...be happy...! | MSEE::KELLEY | Custom clubs/club repair | Wed Apr 12 1989 10:02 | 28 |
|
Anybody that plays the course in Pelham (I think it is actually
called Pine Valley) on the weekends particularly has to be willing
to take a loooonnnnnnnngggggggg time to play 18. To start with,
as Pam mentioned, it is only 9 holes so you have to alternate people
just starting out with those coming off of #9 and the course is
very short, so there is no place for things to open up....!!!!!
At least two of the par 4s are reachable the 1st being one of
them, then the second is a par 3, etc... This is no excuse for
people being jerks, but this is why play there will always be
slow (oh ya, they don't have tee times either, atleast they didn't).
I played 18 holes yesterday in three hours (that includes stopping
after nine for a beer and hot dog) this was at Charmingfare (they
just opened yesterday). This is the other extreem, but shows how
little time is really needed to play 18 holes. BTW, when I was a
couple years younger and when courses weren't as busy as they are
these days, I played "81" holes in one day...! Those days are LONG
gone and will never be seen by the players that are just taking
up the game now...! I just hope that they continue to plan to
build more courses to help with the overcrowding that we all are
seeing now...
Let's try to keep our cool and "do the right thing" both here in
the notes file and out there on the crowded courses...!
Gene
|
569.55 | Calm yourself | MJOFS::FAGLEY | beat the resident | Wed Apr 12 1989 10:23 | 12 |
| Roy,
Don't be discouraged by what you read in this topic. Very few
deaths occur on the golf course! Starting a topic on slow play
is a sure fire way to ensure a wide range of replies. I have
accidentally hit into people a time or two, and haven't had my brains
bashed in yet. I've also been on the other side and don't even
give dirty looks at the group behind me. 99% of the time it is
unintentional and the offender feels bad enough already.
Rick_I'll_buy_you_a_beer_if_I_get_one_too_close!
|
569.56 | | SPMFG1::TENEROWICZT | | Wed Apr 12 1989 12:03 | 13 |
|
I wonder if turning to the offending group, bending over and picking
up the offending ball, raising the offending ball and yelling
"THANK'S"
lowering the offending ball,placing the offending ball into your
pocket and then driving off would be taken?? :-)
Tom
Just a thought
|
569.57 | Step on it. | ISLNDS::GARY | I'm the NRA | Wed Apr 12 1989 13:06 | 4 |
| On occasion, I've been known to step on the ball or otherwise provide
a semi-buried lie.
-Alan-
|
569.58 | 1000 points of light | ESPN::BLAISDELL | Anything you need...you got it! | Wed Apr 12 1989 13:18 | 5 |
|
....and all this time I thought golf was suppose to be
a "gentlemen's game"?
-rick_who's_for_a_gentler_kinder_round
|
569.59 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed Apr 12 1989 13:22 | 20 |
|
RE .48
I've had people hit into me Hundreds of times. 99.9999999% of the
time it was unintentional. I'm talking about the jerks who hit into
me every chance they get. One group in particular did it about 7
times on the front 9 (once hitting my nephew in the back). Only
once did I ever get mad at someone the first time he did it bacause
it definetly wasn't unintentional. It was the 1st hole at Amherst
one Sunday about 2 years ago. We're on the green finishing out putts
(which went pretty fast, 3 of us playing only 2 putted each), and
this jerk about 40 yards out with a clear view of us on the green
and the 2 foursums on the next tee, decided to hit on the green
to move us along. That one I didn't hit back to him, I picked it
up and threw it at him. It was on the green about 2' from the pin,
probably would have made birdie. If you don't like the way I handled
it, well that's your opinion and I respect it. But the guy never
said a word and stayed away from us for the next 17 holes.
Mike
|
569.60 | | WORDS::NISKALA | Margo pulled a groin muscle. Whos? | Wed Apr 12 1989 15:17 | 10 |
| re .-1
Mike,
You were too kind. You should have thrown it in the brook! I
can see if you've been hit into by the same group a few times
that actions were required. Once is forgiven without explanation,
twice give them the benefit of the doubt (career shot hit maybe?)
but 3 times and your out. Definitely toss it back, or better yet
lose it for them.
|