T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
132.1 | oops | HAVOC::DESROCHERS | | Thu Jul 23 1987 01:48 | 8 |
|
that's obviously "break" and "wind" in those "variables" in
.o.
this vt125 at home sucks!
tom_who's_awaiting_a_vaxmate
|
132.2 | Love the 'side door' | OCKER::REGGLER | Hacker/Eagle hunter | Thu Jul 23 1987 10:29 | 17 |
| -< agree ... but ... >-
Yea, I'd generally go along with the firm putt that if missed would
travel the 'recommended' foot and a half past the hole, but I also
find this to be true when putting form no nearer than 2 meters.
Nothing is more frustrating than hitting a putt from less than 2
meters and see it flash past the lip, having too much velocity to
drop, or flip out and do a 180 !
There again I love it when I sneak one in the side door just because
the speed would have carried it one or two inches past if a millimeter
more offline !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Working on the putting stats...
Peter
|
132.12 | <Putting it into perspective...> | GORT::CARLSON | | Thu Jul 23 1987 18:55 | 22 |
| <TAKEN INTO CONTEXT>
I believe that the source of your information comes from this
months edition of GOLF magazine ("Whats a good putt?" pgs 34-35
by Dave Pelz) in which the entire edition was dedicated to the
fine art of Putting.
I agree with .2, as does the author of the article (by the way
I read it), in that he explains that the "make probability" of
"first try putts", by PGA pro's, under "real conditions" for putts
over 10 feet are a staggering low 22% or LESS. The author of this
article is making a point that by being aggressive from outside
of the 10 foot range, reduces significantly the effects of outside
factors such as break, cleat marks, small deficiencies in the green
etc.
As a matter of practice I'm gonna try this on the practice greens
during the coming weeks and see where it gets me during league play.
Garry
|
132.3 | Depends on the green .... | JUNIOR::GSMITH | a | Thu Jul 23 1987 19:56 | 17 |
| Yea.... I think that a firm putt usually eliminates many of the
flaws with public greens.... ie: ball marks (boy, people who don't
fix their ball marks bug the heck out of me) .... 'cleat
draggers..(pick up your feet, man).....
The problem with this type of putt is when you are playing very
fast greens, or have a down hill putt. On a down hill putt, if you
stroke it too hard.... your going to go waaaaaaaaaay by the hole,
and even if it's on-line, you may bounce off the lip. I suggest
that down hillers, and very fast greens must be played differently.
You MUST read the green for breaks, and let the break of the green
guide your ball into the cup. Yes, at all times you should go slightly
past the hole.... cause I have NEVER seen one go in that has been
left SHORT!
Smitty
|
132.4 | SHORT PUTTS | RUNT2::SAURI | | Wed Aug 19 1987 19:57 | 6 |
| LIKE LEE TREVINO SAYS " 98% OF THE SHORT PUTTS DONT GO IN". I ALSO
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE TO PLAY THE GREENS DEPENDING ON HOW FAST THEY
ARE THAT DAY. I HAVE BEEN PLAYING 'THE INTERNATIONAL' LATELY AND
I WOULD RATHER LEAVE IT SHORT ON SOME PUTTS THEN TO LOOK AT A THREE
PUTT COMING BACK. THOSE GREENS ARE THE FASTES GREEN IN THE STATE.
|
132.5 | | VINO::RASPUZZI | Michael Raspuzzi | Mon Aug 24 1987 17:57 | 8 |
| In this month's Golf Digest, they say that it is better to knock
a putt by the hole. By watching it travel by the hole, you can figure
out what kind of break will be coming back.
Of course, I try to knock all of my putts *into* the hole first.
If it misses, I hope it goes by slightly.
Mike
|
132.6 | Consistently Inconsistent | DICKNS::F_MCGOWAN | | Mon Sep 14 1987 22:42 | 10 |
| I think the best putt I ever made, that didn't drop, was the one
I made last Saturday: I was about 90 feet from the hole, and was
considering hitting it with a 3-wood. Anyway, I hit it as hard as
I could (was sure I'd wind up chipping back from the adjacent tee),
and it just skimmed the edge of the hole and stopped 6 inches past.
Of course, I proceeded to 3-putt the next hole...
Frank
|
132.7 | back of the cup | BTO::HOGANP | | Mon Jan 23 1989 10:56 | 12 |
|
Never up never in I guess is the cry of most of us and it is so
true. BUT, I for on e find it very upsetting when I put a ball three
feet by the hole and three put. Got to find the middle ground and
that is what seperates the men from the boys. when you have the
touch. Always around the hole. We need to have the good machanics
but we also have to have the feel for the greens. 17 inches by is
to much for this cowboy if I don't hit the put correctly that could
very easily turn into tree feet or if I miss the line on a fast
green. BACK OF THE CUP, that's the ticket.
Lasher
|
132.8 | Practice practice practice...... | OBRIEN::KEVIN | Custom Clubs & Repair | Mon Jan 23 1989 13:12 | 14 |
| re: <<< Note 132.7 by BTO::HOGANP >>>
-< back of the cup >-
>> I for on e find it very upsetting when I put a ball three
>> feet by the hole and three put.
The best advice I can give you is to practice 5 footers. Personally I
don't mind going 3 feet by the hole because I've made so many from 5
feet it looks like a tap in.
KO
|
132.9 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Tue Jan 24 1989 14:43 | 28 |
| I find that if you can't make the 3fter on a consistant basis then
it usuall three putt time.
Here is a putting lessen I use for the better half of the year until
I feel that I have the "feel".
Take five golf balls out of the bag an to the practice green. Start
12 inches from the hole. Putt. for each ball within one putter's
blade length you get one point. For each put sunk you get 2 points.
Object is to score 7 points or better.
Once you score 7 points or better move to a different point around
the hole and add 6" to the length of the putts. If your unsuccessful
at scoring 7 points from a distance move to another side of the
hole and continue. If you fail three times to score 7 or more then
digress by 6" and continue.
It may sound like a pain but it can be fun.
From here when I think I have the "feel' I then putt from short,long
etc. but only with one ball. My feeling is that they don't give
you two chances on the green so why take two on the practice green.
Also I'm not to concerned with sinking putts on the practice green.
Most times you spend much more time studying a putt on the course
than you do on the practice green. If you get a close line but the
distance is on(min. being to the hole, Max. being 12" past) then
most of the battle is won.
Tom
|
132.10 | | VINO::RASPUZZI | Michael Raspuzzi | Wed Jan 25 1989 10:46 | 19 |
| Re .-1:
Sounds a lot like the drill I do. Except I am a little tougher on
myself. I start with 6 balls in a circle around the hole at about
2 feet. Then I try to make all 6 putts. When I do, I add another
foot to the putts. If I miss even 1, then I do them all over from
the current distance.
It gets interesting when you get out to about 6 feet. I think the
furthest I ever got from the hole was 12 feet. Trying to make 6
12 foot putts from around the hole was tough.
It is good to put the balls around the hole instead of wacking 6
putts from the same spot because if you do it from the same spot,
then it makes it too easy from trial and error to learn the line
and speed. When you are constantly moving, it makes your judgement
of putts get better.
Mike
|
132.11 | | WFOV11::MORRISON | Ain't too proud to beg | Mon Apr 03 1989 08:00 | 10 |
|
In this week's Sports Illustrated there is an interesting article
on some putting stats from the PGA tour. Seems that the pro's
make only 58% of their putts from 6 feet. So the next time you've
got a 6 footer remember, a pro only has a 50-50 shot of making it
so don't expect too much out of yourself :^)
Mike
|
132.13 | winter sports | NOVA::FINNERTY | Sell high, buy low | Mon Jan 17 1994 13:14 | 13 |
|
re: -.1 on Dave Pelz
Dave Pelz has a great book out on putting named "Putt like the
Pros", and is sold at B&N. I followed his suggestions as well
as I could last year with good results.
I'm purchasing a 'putting track', which helps to groove your
swing path and to ensure that the blade is perpendicular to the
path. Has anyone else tried the Pelz putting track?
/Jim
|
132.14 | Pelz putting track | NOVA::FINNERTY | Sell high, buy low | Wed Jan 26 1994 11:29 | 18 |
|
Since the winter is too long, I spent an unreasonable amount of money
on a "putting track" from Dave Pelz. It has a pair of curved aluminum
rails to groove your putter path, and lines along the top to help check
alignment at any point during the stroke. There's a mirror at one end
that allows you to verify that your eye is directly over the ball at
address. I've also added a couple of clips on my putter (costing a
whopping 30�) that ensure that I make contact on the sweet spot.
Overkill? perhaps. But I feel like I'm practicing the _right_ thing
for the first time. It's a great way to learn to set up properly and
automatically. Pelz believes that you need to take 20K correct swings
before your muscles can no longer remember how to hit the ball any
other way; whether or not that's true, it's an eye-opener to see just
how bad your (my) swing is, and how much room for improvement there is.
/Jim
|