T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2311.1 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Tue Apr 10 1990 09:51 | 7 |
| Compression, important to keeping a consisitant level
reverb for depth
and enhancer for that extra sizzle...
dbii
|
2311.2 | | NRPUR::DEATON | In Tents | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:11 | 7 |
| You'd probably get all the information you need from looking at older
notes. Try these on for size.
2243 DYO780::SCHAFER 19-JAN-1990 7 Vocal Effects Processing - Howzit Done?
2224 PUGGS::DESROCHERS 4-JAN-1990 6 Vocal Effects for Live PA System - What To Get
1158 SIMUL8::RUDNICK 19-JAN-1988 55 Recommendation - How To Record Vocals
452 BARTOK::ARNOLD 1-AUG-1986 4 Local Yokel seeks better Vocal
|
2311.3 | Doubling effects | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:12 | 21 |
| In addition to the ones mentioned, a harmonizor and a delay
(used in stereo) can bring the vocals "out" a bit more.
I'm not talking about using a harmonizer to add "harmonies". I'm
talking about various "doubling" effects:
o Delay: a slight delay (I think 85ms or so, I'm not real sure).
You might want to slightly modulate the delay. This is sorta
like double-tracking.
o Harmonizer: a slight detuning panned to the opposite speaker.
This creates a sort of doubling effect as well and can be
use with the delay.
I made some experiments on borrowed harmonizer and thought this
worked real well. It's especially handy if you like that
double-tracked sound but either don't have enough stripes on
your tape or your singing is not consistent enough to actually
double.
db
|
2311.4 | compression, eh | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:32 | 6 |
| I've access to all the above except a compressor. I know we've been
over this before, but is this really *that* important? Assuming I'm
convinced, what's a good unit to acquire for, say, less than a couple
hundred bux or so?
+b
|
2311.5 | "Important?" don't know - "worthwhile" yes | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:57 | 26 |
| It's funny but I think vocals sound more "realistic" without
compression, but unfortunately that's not how we're used to hearing
vocals on recorded music.
Also, uncompressed vocals seemed to have so much "presence" (for lack
of a better word) that usually seem too isolated and separated
from the rest of the mix. I.E. it doesn't really sound like it
was recorded with the band.
I've noticed that difference between various COMMUSIC submissions.
What can I say? I'm pretty sold on compressors and I was a tough
sell. I think part of it is that it isn't really an "effect". It's
not really an "enhancer" like a chorus. It's sort of a recording tool
and one reason why a lot of people may not get it is cause it's
sorta hard to understand what it does and why you'd want to do that.
Anyway, you should be able to get yourself a fine compressed in
the $250-$350 range. Below that, I'd be concerned with getting
something that isn't very noisey. This probably means avoiding
cheap compressors that have lots of features. A coule of the various
"Micro" type compressors seem pretty good even if they don't give
you extensive/fine control (Alesis MicroCompressor, Boss series
etc.)
|
2311.6 | Signex 16 Bits | BAHTAT::KENT | peekay | Tue Apr 10 1990 11:29 | 11 |
|
Best Vocal effect I ever found was the one I used on commusic I which
must be going back 4 years now. My how time passes when you're having
fun. At the time everybody said that I sounded like Mark Knopfler which
I guess is O.K. if you like said Sultan. As it is I just happened to
be recovering from a severe cold and gave up trying to sing musically.
Sort of a Cold Compress..
If you see what I mean ! :-X
|
2311.7 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Tue Apr 10 1990 12:57 | 10 |
| re: under $200
Alesis micro limiter
Necessary? If you want a reasonably clean noise free vocal track, yes, if you
want vocal levels that are manageable, yes. If you want to limit the dynamic
range of vocals to something approaching that of the tape you're recording on
yes...
dbii
|
2311.8 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Tue Apr 10 1990 16:46 | 8 |
|
Used Symetrix 501
Used dbx 160
Standard SR vocals, 25ms delay + touch of reverb
CdH
|
2311.9 | Try this! | STOIC::ALAN | | Fri Mar 29 1991 13:29 | 31 |
| I've been out of this conference for over a year so my reply to this
note is a bit late, but I figured I'd add my .02 for any future
readers.
I had an 8-track studio for a number of years and had all of the
standard effects that would be normally used for recording vocal
tracks. DBX Compressor/Limiter, digital delays, a harmonizer, graphic
and parametric eq, reverb etc.
But you want to know the one thing that made the most incredible
difference in my vocal tracks?
Voice lessons!!
I had been singing for at least twenty years without the benefit of
lessons and wasn't that bad, but the lessons and the vocal practice
imposed by my teacher made my voice over completely. I learned to use
range I never knew I had as well as modulate my voice better. I also
learned that I had been writing songs in the wrong key for my voice
for years. Once I started writing in the right key my voice took on a
whole new presence of its own. Combine that with the strength and
flexibility added through vocal practice and it was like discovering
an instrumental capability I never knew I had.
Adding the studio effects on top of the new voice was like icing on a
great big cake!!! Anyone who really wants to improve their vocals
should find a good teacher and take lessons for at least a year. You
won't regret it!
|