T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2299.1 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Tue Mar 27 1990 09:59 | 15 |
|
Brad,
The multitrack cassettes and small format reels use dbx or Dolby C to
help out with the crosstalk issue. Make sure that NR is on and
calibrated. Also, compress the click track from the HR16, and +3dB
sounds a little hot as well. Try under zero.
FX pre or post...depends on what you're using th channel for. If you're
using it for an effects send, then set it post fader to control the
effects with the slider. If you're using it for a normal input, and
want to control FX via an effects bus, then set it pre fader.
CdH
|
2299.2 | {hit}{hiiiiiittttttttt} | LEDDEV::ROSS | shiver me timbres.... | Tue Mar 27 1990 11:33 | 12 |
|
You'll find that pre-fade allows wider control of dry
to totally-wet....like strings far away in a huge hall, ya know?
The few studio sessions Ive done I noticed that any sync
stripe or automation control track is put on an EDGE
track, with AT LEAST ONE guard track (ie, unused) right
next to it. This is usually track 23,24 (or 31,32?)...but
the big machines dont have staggered heads...
ron
|
2299.3 | my kingdom for smpte | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Tue Mar 27 1990 11:41 | 21 |
| RE: sync
The 238 has built in features for sync on channel 8 ("tape sync"
switch, which defeats dbx on 8, and a "filter" switch, which bandpass
filters all signals except specific midrange/FSK type bands).
Funny - trk 8 is an edge, and I had *nothing* on 7. Hmmm.
All that stuff was set up properly. All I can come up with is that the
drumswere simply being recorded "too hot". Which brings me to another
question ...
Howcum I record a track at a certain level (say, 0 db) but it plays
back at -3db? It's happened on every deck I've ever owned/used.
RE: pre/post fade EQ
That's kinda what I thought. With the QV, I can control the wet/dry
mix via MIDI CCs, so I usually just use pre-fade.
-b
|
2299.4 | Calibration Blues | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Tue Mar 27 1990 12:19 | 42 |
|
> Howcum I record a track at a certain level (say, 0 db) but it plays
> back at -3db? It's happened on every deck I've ever owned/used.
This is a calibration issue. A correctly calibrated deck will adjust
the record gain so that anything measuring "0" on the (source) meters will
read "0" on playback. On some home machines, there are levels for
"Dolby calibration" and they do just that; Dolby playback level of "0"
VU is carefully stipulated (a 400 Hz tone is used) and you essentially
calibrate the tape you are using so that you put the correct amount of
signal onto the tape to make it meet the playback criteria. Confused
yet?
If your tapes always play back low (as you stated) you will get treble
loss due to miscalibration if you use Dolby, or in the case of dbx, you
may get exagerated "breathing" effects.
A secondary problem is the question of the effect of EQ on the meters.
Tandberg decks read the record signal *after* record EQ is applied
since this EQ is largely treble boosting and can contribute to tape
saturation and self-erasure. Self-erasure is a property of tape such
that once it is saturated, increasing the signal to the tape causes the
tape to actually retain *less* signal.
A third problem is head alignment and tape "skewing". If the track
doesn't line up perfectly with the playback head, you can get signal
loss. This problem is more prevalent with multi-head machines (this is
why Nak machines with 3 heads have an azimuth adjustment, they actually
let you move the PB head until it "lines up" with the tape tracks). On
machines like Portastudios which use a combined record/playback head,
this should not be an issue.
Changing from one tape type to another, getting a different batch of
the same tape, going from C-60 to C-90 lengths, even skipping a head
cleaning before each session can all cause miscalibration. I see this
on my home deck, since I have the capability to calibrate from the
front panel (all oscillators are built-in), I bias and adjust Dolby
level for each tape just prior to recording. Amazing how much I have
to adjust the controls from one cassette to the next to keep things
within 1 dB.
Brian
|
2299.5 | all variants removed. prob persists | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Tue Mar 27 1990 15:30 | 14 |
| Er - okay ... but this thing has no built-in mixer, or EQ or anything
else to deal with. The head similarly is dual-function (playback or
record) so I seriously doubt an azimuth problem.
A "brute force" example: I recorded FSK to chan 8, using a direct out
from the HR16. Set incoming signal to 0db on VU meters (peak meters,
if it matters). It plays back at -3db on the same meters. Are you
talking about the same thing? How in blazes do I calibrate the deck?
Incidentally, this is the first time it's been used since I got it. I'd
think that the chances of it arriving (direct from Teac) in an
uncalibrated state would be minimal ... ?
-b
|
2299.6 | Never Assume Anything Is Calibrated | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Tue Mar 27 1990 16:27 | 10 |
|
The EQ I'm referring to is internal adjustments. All tape decks
perform record and playback equalization, that's why you have "tape
type" switches on home decks.
As I said, different tapes require different settings. If Tascam set it
up for Maxell XLII and you're using TDK SA or whatever, that could
cause a mismatch, believe me.
Brian
|
2299.7 | mumble | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Tue Mar 27 1990 17:48 | 7 |
| I see. Perhaps I should try using a TDK (I've used only Maxell UDXLIIs
to this point). If that doesn't work, looks like I'm going to be
making my own blasted adjustments.
At least the M50 sends out several test tones so I *can* calibrate.
-b
|
2299.8 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Nice computers don't go down | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:32 | 5 |
| Brad, My 688 is essentially a porta studio versionof the 238. I've
striped to tape a couple of times and had NO crosstalk or problems with
any of the tracks...your deck may need an alignment.
dbii
|
2299.9 | | SWAV1::STEWART | As a matter of fact, it's all dark | Wed Mar 28 1990 12:29 | 14 |
| re .8
Does it seem likely that a combined record/playback head can
shift position between the record pass and the playback passes?
Guess it could be possible that the head laminations aren't
parallel to the tape tracks, which might really lower the
machines specs, kinda like trying to do helical scan without
spinning the head...
If I had to bet money, I'd say the levels were too hot. That'll
definitely cause the bleedover. Brad, can you strip at a lower
level? Maybe the production line miscalibrated your
meters... Time to get your own calibration tape!
|
2299.10 | comncton lne dropots | SWAV1::STEWART | As a matter of fact, it's all dark | Wed Mar 28 1990 12:34 | 14 |
|
re: .9
This question "Brad, can you strip at a lower level?" was subject
to, uh, transmission errors. This question should have read
"Brad, can you stripe at a lower level?" We regret the
inconvenience to any readers who may have sprayed tea/coffee into
their keyboards.
|
2299.11 | power problems? and noise | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Mon Apr 09 1990 16:42 | 31 |
| I went back and determined that I did indeed have a level problem;
there's a pot on the rear of the 238 that controls the signal level
coming in on track 8 in sync mode - the HR was reading -3db, and I
bumped it up to 0db. So far, no problem.
Here's another weird problem - I have all my gear patched into a Roland
M160, then into a Tascam M50 which is the tape deck board. The M160 is
dead quiet, but I get this annoying hum (sounds like 60 cycle) at the
M50 in. This is presumably because the M50 accepts only RCA ins
(-10db) and the M160 sends a +4db signal out 1/4" or XLRs. I'm using
good Roland 1/4" to RCA cables (ones shipped with my MKS70). I figure
that either the cords are improperly shielded, that one or both of the
cords is bad (doubtful), or that I have a line level mismatch. Any
ideas?
Another oddity - I seem to consistently get a "whirring" sound on tape
(kinda like an electrical motor starting & stopping). By consistent, I
mean "inevitably", because I can't reproduce it at will, but it'll show
up every so often when I have everything powered up. I don't think I
have an appliance on the same circuit, much less on that kicks on as
often as this appears (I can count it at least once every minute).
Ideas there?
Slight aside - I did get rid of some of the residual system noise by
moving the Kurzweil 1000PX away from the mixer - it originally was
mounted directly underneath the M160. I kept getting a strange hum
until I moved it to the bottom of the rack. Very strange.
Anyone have electrical noise problems associated with wall bugs?
+b
|
2299.12 | Whirring sound: disk drive? | NRADM::KARL | It's computerized, no thing c,an go wrong nothing c an g | Mon Apr 09 1990 17:07 | 12 |
| Brad,
I just noticed last night, as a matter of fact, that the whirring of
the PC disk drive comes in over the metronome cable from my OP-4001
MIDI interface. Could you be having a similar problem?
I also experienced a noisy hum from my 1000PX apparently related to
a ground loop, which you may have seen described in a previous note
a while back.
Good Luck - I hope you solve your whirring problem.
Bill
|
2299.13 | Welcome To The Wonderful World Of Digital Bleedthrough | AQUA::ROST | Bass is the place | Tue Apr 10 1990 09:19 | 6 |
|
A "whirring" sound is usually some RF being emanated from something
with a microprocessor on board, i.e. you're picking up some kind of
clocking signal. Check your grounding!
Brian
|
2299.14 | ain't got no | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:36 | 10 |
| Er, grounding? {blush} We have no grounding in this house. In fact, I
had to use a ground lift on the main power strip for this very reason.
I checked everything over and am pretty sure that all polarized plugs
are uniformly "plugged in". What else can I do? I can't seem to
isolate the noise to any single unit.
I should know this by know.
+b the embarassed
|
2299.15 | I Hope You Grounded Your Washing Machine | AQUA::ROST | Bass is the place | Tue Apr 10 1990 11:01 | 4 |
| If you have no grounding, take any *one* unit and ground it to a water
pipe.
Brian
|
2299.16 | when in doubt, ground it! | SWAV1::STEWART | As a matter of fact, it's all dark | Tue Apr 10 1990 22:05 | 14 |
|
Another thing you can do is to get some braided ground cable and
connect all of the components cabinets together. This helps in
some situations, but be sure that all of your polarized gear is
polarized the same way. To be supercautious, before you put the
braid in, tie it to one component and use a DVM to measure the
potential between the braid and each of the other components.
You should also take precautions not to juice yourself in the
process in case one of your components cabinets is accidentally
energized. This braid essentially duplicates the electrical path
provided by the shield of your line cords, but with lower
resistance...so the theory goes.
|
2299.17 | Ground Loops | OTOA01::ELLACOTT | non_teenage_mutant_ninja_bassist | Thu Apr 12 1990 15:58 | 28 |
| Sometimes you can get the hum (60Hz) from too much grouding.
A ground loop can be set up if you have multiple gound paths to
your central ground point, like your mixer. This happens more if
the two paths are of different lengths but the jist of it is that
they work like large antennas, picking up any electro-magnetic
interferance. Midi cables will not provide a ground path if properly
wired, only signal cables. To fix this problem, the shield or ground
at one end of the offending cables should be cut. This maintains
the shielding from the other end but breaks the loop. BE SURE THAT
YOU HAVE AT THE ONE GROUND PATH, because if its unplugged all you
will get is hum.
This proceedure may only be required between key pieces of gear
such as your tape machine(s) and the mixer, processing gear (2 or
more cables to each). The discovery of which piece(s) are the offender
is on a trail and error basis, and maintaining which cables are which
takes some organization.
re .before_somewhere
Ground your central grounding point in your set-up to a good
ground in your house, like a water pipe. You may want to be able
to disconnect this easily if you get a lot of lightening in your
area. In fact disconnect it all from the outside world when not
in use......
From The Society For the Prevention of the Premature
FRYING of Favourite Gear due to High Tension Electro Static Discharge
between the Earth and the Vapourous Gasses surounding it.
|
2299.18 | details - can't seem to find the source | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Thu Apr 12 1990 17:22 | 29 |
| Here's what I've got, from a kind of top-view perspective. I have all
my synth gear plugged into a Roland M160 in a rack.
+----------------<------------<---------<--+ (2 �" to RCA cables)
| +-------------<------------<---------<-+ |
v v | |
+------------------+ +------------+ +-------------+
| Tascam M50 |--->| Tascam 238 | | Roland M160 | \
| 12 x 8 mixer |<---| 8tr casset | | 16x2 mixer | \ *large*
+------------------+ +------------+ |-------------| / rack
| all other | /
| MIDI gear |/
+-------------+
One power strips acts as a master, and has 3 things plugged into it:
the M50, the 238, and the rack (one line to the rack). Unless there's
a ground problem between the M50 and the rack, I'm inclined to dismiss
a ground loop.
When I listen to the headphone out of the M160, I get ABSOLUTELY NO
NOISE AT ALL.
The M50 is dead quiet until I plug in the cables coming from the M160.
Then I get the hum. Note that these cables are the small ones, kinda
like "cheap guitar cables". Could this be the problem?
Turning the tape deck on or off has no effect on the signal.
+b
|
2299.19 | Check the not so obvious | TROA01::HITCHMOUGH | | Mon Apr 16 1990 09:15 | 15 |
| Brad, you don't mention what audio gear this is all plugged into.
I had very similar symptoms and searched for hours to find the cause.
I eventually traced it to my audio pre-amp. I had one of those adaptors
that allows you to connect directly to the t.v. cable for FM reception.
Removing that removed the hummmm completely.
The lesson I learned was to check the not so obvious as well as
the obvious.
I doubt whether thee cables are the problem if they are screened.
Don't be too neat though in your routing, a tangled mess is sometimes
better than a nice tight bunch.
Ken
|
2299.20 | this is getting to be a pain | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Thu Apr 26 1990 13:12 | 34 |
| Well, I took everything apart and went thru piece by piece. First off,
the wiring in this part of the house is about 50 years old, and has no
grounds whatsoever. So I tried running a ground strap from the rack
(from the entire power strip as well). No dice. So I disconnected it.
Then worked backwards from M50. When it was the only thing powered up,
it had 60 cycle noise (!). A ground lift fixed the problem. Next,
connected tape deck. No noise introduced when running tapes for any
reason. Fine - M50 and 238 work together with no noise.
Next - power up rack piece by piece. M160 connected to M50. Some
noise, probably due to +4db outs connected to -10db ins ... properly
attenuated, there seemed to be very little noise. Power up KX76 and
Atari ST. No noise. Power up Oberheim. No noise. Power up MKS70. No
noise (I'm beginning to appreciate Roland products more and more).
Power up MIDIverb. Notice slight hiss, but no noise. Power up HR16. No
noise. Power up Proteus. No noise.
Power up Quadraverb (mounted immediately beneath M160 in rack). Argh!
Lots of low frequency noise. Power up Kurzweil 1000PX. AUUUGGGHHH!!
INCREDIBLE amount of noise. Power off everything but M50, 238, M160
and 1000PX. No help. It's definitely the Kurzweil. What gives?
I moved the Kurzweil to the bottom of the rack (as far away from
everything as I possibly could) but it didn't help - as soon as stereo
ins are connected to the M160, here comes the noise.
Could the 4 wall bugs in the bottom of the rack be causing the
problems? Maybe the Kurzweil can't deal with the noise from them? And
why doesn't the MKS have the same problem?
A P330 is starting to look *real* good. 8-(
+b
|
2299.21 | just a few, probably obvious, ideas ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Thu Apr 26 1990 13:30 | 6 |
| Hmmm. Next steps include trying a filter/surge protector on your
power lines (if you haven't already). You might try (carefully) checking
line voltage with a meter. If the rms voltage looks good, try (even
more carefully) looking at it with a scope.
Steve
|
2299.22 | maybe it is your PX (as opposed to PXs in general) | NUTELA::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Thu Apr 26 1990 13:56 | 6 |
| My PX didn't have any noise problems like that. It did have a large
problem with my Atari Screen however...
Chad
(the atari screen really had a large problem with it really)
|
2299.23 | Perhaps the two events are coorelated | PRNSYS::LOMICKAJ | Jeffrey A. Lomicka | Fri Apr 27 1990 13:08 | 14 |
| Putting together what Chad said with what Brad said, I would think that
the Kurtweil unit is emitting a fairly hefty low-frequency
electro-magnetic field, perhaps from its power supply transformer.
In Chad's case, this was picked up by the electron beam in the Atari
monitor, and caused the image to deflect, which caused a visible 10hz
wobble.
This same electro-magnetic field could be easily picked up by any
transformer or even just wires in the proximity of the unit. So while
the hum comes in and out with power applied to the Kurtweil, it may be
some other device that is actually generating it on the audio.
All just theories, mind you, but something to think about.
|
2299.24 | ..but I'm a good guesser | SALSA::MOELLER | Never trust a Prankster. | Fri Apr 27 1990 13:34 | 6 |
| re Kurzweil EM interference and hum issues - mine's in a rack under the
EMAX and over a TEAC stereo 10 band graphic EQ - never a problem. If
you're getting hum thru the AUDIO outputs, you have either a massive
grounding issue or a failing power supply. IMHO/INE (I'm No Expert)
karl
|