T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1841.1 | | SALEM::AMARTIN | Why YES Ad, It is 7 DAYS SMOKEFREE! | Fri Jan 06 1989 05:28 | 5 |
| YEs do tell me also...
I have a Jupiter 8 and a couple of years ago whe I got it, it was
"THE!" thing to have now I havent heard or seen it. whahappens
to em...
do the go to the great icemachine heaven in the sky or what?
|
1841.2 | analog is making a comeback ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | Love is a decision ... | Fri Jan 06 1989 07:17 | 8 |
| Actually, analog is making a comeback. I seem to recall articles
in both MUSICIAN and KEYBOARD indicating that having an analog synth
is a good idea to round out a rig. That's why I have interest in
it and am willing to shell out a few bucks if I find something that
will fill that bill well enough (like maybe a Matrix-1000 if the
price comes down a little more).
Steve
|
1841.3 | Just for a start... | AUSSIE::SULLIVAN | | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:18 | 15 |
| The experts can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that
a Rhodes electric piano was used in Riders On The Storm (by
Fleetwood Mac?). Also, Say Say Say by Paul McCartney & Michael
Jackson. Others will be able to supply many more examples.
An "old" sound I am particularly fond of is the Wurlitzer
electric piano, which I learnt (from either this conference or
MUSIC) was used by Super Tramp. (e.g Logical Song - which I am
addicted to!) There was a brief discussion about the possibility
that the Roland RD range of digital pianos emulates the Wurlitzer,
did anyone find out if this is correct?
Greg.
|
1841.4 | "Rhiannon" by Jim Morrison? ;^) | WEFXEM::COTE | Don't let the door hit ya, Mike... | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:27 | 6 |
| Riders On The Storm was done by The Doors... and it was a Rhodes.
Wanna hear a B-3? Listen to jazz organist Jimmy Smith. If ya can
get past his arrogance, he's a master of the instrument.
Edd
|
1841.5 | Less Can Be More To A Working Stiff | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:49 | 25 |
|
Well, while I don't *see* these instruments much anymore, I still
*hear* them.
For instance, while a keyboardist may use something else on tour
for an organ, in astudio where a B-3 is available, he'll probably
use it. Many studio players still use Mini Moogs, although usually
MIDIfied, because they still like the sounds it puts out.
However, for a live player who would like an instrument that doesn't
weigh two tons, doesn't drift out of tune under the spotlights,
and can switch between sounds in less than a second, these older
instruments just aren't worth the trouble.
Also, nowadays you can buy one instrument for under $1000 that can
emulate the three mentioned, plus do strings, horns, etc. In 1972 a
MiniMoog cost over $2000, a B3 was also in the thousands, and a Rhodes
about $800. Now, considering inflation...
BTW, back around 1985, just before MIDI exploded (not *that* long ago)
I was in a top 40 band and our keyboard man had a Hammond (M
something?), a Rhodes, a Mini Moog and an ARP Omni. So the decline of
these instruments has been rather sudden.
|
1841.6 | Uh Oh, I'm Dating Myself Again | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:52 | 17 |
|
About songs with those axes:
Hammond organ:
As mentioned, Booker T. and the MGs and Jimmy Smith
Also anything by Keith Emerson of ELP, Traffic and Spencer Davis
Group with Steve Winwood, Rick Wakeman of Yes, etc.
Mini Moog:
Jan Hammer with Jeff Beck and Mahavishnu, ELP doing "Lucky Man",
Chick Corea with Return to Forever
Fender Rhodes:
almost any jazz fusion record made during the 1970s
|
1841.7 | AHA!!!!!!! | KERNEL::FLOWERS | Hero of the Green Screen... | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:14 | 15 |
|
Right!!!!
It turns out that the sounds I have heard on various records
and have fallen in love with and I am constantly (unsuccesfully)
trying to emulate are actually these instuments I keep hearing
about!!!!
"The Logical Song", that sound is GREAT!!
Any idea what Pink Floyd used to use ala. Set the Controls, One
of these days etc.
Come to that any idea what they (-Rog) are using now?? Especially
on their recent tour (AWESOME!!).
Jason.
|
1841.8 | still popular with blues bands, too | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:15 | 12 |
|
Nothing sounds like a Hammond. I haven't heard any synth, sampling
or otherwise, be able to sucessfully emulate a Hammond with a big
Leslie. Not yet, anyways.
songs:
Whiter Shade of Pale....Procol Harum
anything by the Allman Brothers...Dreams, Whipping Post
CdH
|
1841.9 | Deep Purple = Hammonds | POSEUR::CARRUTHERS | | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:19 | 4 |
|
If you really want to hear the big Hammonds then listen to some
early Deep Purple. John Lord used (and still does) give them a real
work out.
|
1841.10 | The Lowrey Organ | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:35 | 8 |
|
Early Pink Floyd used Lowrey organs. By the time of "Meddle" and
"Dark Side" they had added on the VCS3 synthesizer (sold here in the
US as the Putney).
Some other UK bands that favored the Lowrey sound were Caravan and
Soft Machine.
|
1841.11 | | CANYON::MOELLER | | Fri Jan 06 1989 10:02 | 2 |
| jan Hammer played Rhodes exclusively on John McLaughlin's 'Inner
Mounting Flame' album.. one'o'my alltime faves.
|
1841.12 | | BANTER::HARRIMAN | Back to the Grind | Fri Jan 06 1989 11:07 | 12 |
|
Keith Emerson and Rick Wakeman used Hammond C-3s not B-3s -
subtle difference.
Y'all forgot Mellotrons. -moody blues, Yes, etc. strings, flutes.
Plenty of decent Hammond clones. Y-word, Korg, etc. Not many good
Leslie sound-alikes.
Also RMI pianos - Wakeman used one - it had a harpsichord sound.
/pjh
|
1841.13 | Former Rhodes owner | LEDDEV::HASTINGS | | Fri Jan 06 1989 11:28 | 16 |
| Anyone that wonders why he never sees the old instruments (Rhodes,
Hammond B3, etc...) has obviously never carried one to a gig!
For a long time there I was convinced that in order for anything
to be billed as "portable" it need only have a handle on it somewhere.
There were many good gigs that I played, everyone in the band real
good friends... until it was time to pack up. "Anyone mind helping
me with the Rhodes?" I'd ask. All of a sudden I'd feel like a total
stranger with some rare and contagious disease.
I agree you can't beat the old instruments for sound BUT I'll settle
for the sound of my EPS minus the backache anyday!
Mark who-used-to-haul-a-Rhodes
|
1841.14 | Hammond Armour | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Yo! | Fri Jan 06 1989 11:31 | 30 |
| According to an article about Hammond I read awhile back the only
difference between a C-3 and a B-3 is the cabinet.
Anyway, another classic sound is the Farfisa organ. I'm not really
sure, but I think the Doors used them a lot, and I think it's what's
on "Light My Fire".
I never got into Farfisa.
On synthetic Hammond patches. I have one ESQ-1 patch that for ONE
particular setting of the Mod wheel is indistinguishable from
a Hammond (sounds real). Everyone has their "bread and butter"
patches/samples/etc that they go back to, and that one is #2
for me behind the Roland Electric Piano I (Rhodes) sound.
The mod wheel position that it sounds good on is all the way on.
It gives you one of the many "screamin" hammond/leslie sounds.
Unfortunately, to really replace a Hammond, you need something that
acts just like the Leslie switch. Many synths are architecturally
incapable of doing that because they don't allow you to modulate
the speed of the LFO's. Even the ESQ-1 which has one of the most
flexible architectures (nearly ANYTHING can be modulated by nearly
ANYTHING) does not provide that.
Oddly enough, I think every Hammond sample I've heard was pretty bad
and not as good as many synths are capable of. I find myself
at a loss to come up with any rationale explanation for that.
db
|
1841.15 | I "should" be able to do it... | KERNEL::FLOWERS | Hero of the Green Screen... | Fri Jan 06 1989 11:41 | 11 |
|
In that case maybe with a bit more experience I should be able to
get a decent hammond sound as on the M1 i can add an internal effect
called rotary speaker...it sounds just like you are whirling your
amp around your head!!
Anyone care to help on programming the M1????? ;-)
Jason.
|
1841.16 | Move a Rhodes? You must be nuts...;^) | WEFXEM::COTE | Don't let the door hit ya, Mike... | Fri Jan 06 1989 11:42 | 8 |
| > Hammond sample...bad...
I've got one that is fairly good, but I agree with you. (!)
I think a major reason is the *sampled* leslie, causing all the
notes to modulate at a different rate...
Edd
|
1841.17 | More moog | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Fri Jan 06 1989 12:46 | 9 |
|
Steve Winwood's solo records feature his individual style of
mini/polymoog playing.
Stanlet Clark's 'Schooldays' album is unremarkable EXCEPT for the
minimoog solos by (George Duke?).
Richard.
|
1841.18 | and yeah leslie | NAC::SCHUCHARD | PC Arcade | Fri Jan 06 1989 12:58 | 5 |
|
and to further triumph the leslie - not a phase shifter alive that
sounds as good as a strat thru a leslie!
bs
|
1841.19 | Yam's late great megapoly | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:02 | 9 |
|
Oh yeah and there's the CS80 on Bruford's solo album 'one of a kind'
(think that's the one -- red cover -- Alan Holdsworth on gittar,
Dave Stewart? on keys).
Who can come up with the best blast off a Jupiter 8?
Richard
|
1841.20 | Pomp and circumstance ?? | WARMTH::KAYD | Certainly uncontaminated by cheese | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:03 | 15 |
| re .17
> Stanlet Clark's 'Schooldays' album is unremarkable EXCEPT for the
> minimoog solos by (George Duke?).
Is a 'Stanlet' a small Stan ?? This could be why the album was called
'Schooldays' :-)
Does anyone know what Rick Wakeman used to use in his Yes days - I'm
sure that Mellotrons/Hammonds figured in Yes's sound (come to think
of it, all the 'pomp rock' bands seemed to use these 'old' sounds)
Nostalgically yours,
Derek.
|
1841.21 | B-3 sample for Mirage | HPSTEK::RENE | bad bytes bite me a bit | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:12 | 16 |
| RE: B-3 samples.... (plug for Mike Diorio)
I got a B-3 sample disk that Mike Diorio made himself off of
his B-3. It is sampled 'dry' (i.e. no leslie). You MUST have an
outboard leslie simulator...but it sounds awsome! The best one on the
disk is Kieth Emerson's classic sound with a little overdrive/keyclick
/and percussion on the 5th. It sounds just like the real thing with
outboard leslie thingydoo. One of the other samples is the B-3 with
all drawbars drawn full. What a thick sound! When I first used this
disk I thought that the key contacts on my Mirage were rusted! The
keyclick sounds so real....probably the best part of the sample!
just my 3� ..
Frank
|
1841.22 | He had (literally) tons of stuff. | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:15 | 8 |
|
Wakeman did use Hammond organs (C3 I believe), Mellotrons (two), an RMI
electric piano as was mentioned before, Minimoogs (two), and a
Steinway grand piano. On Six Wives of Henry the 8th, he also used
an ARP Oddysey. Later on (late 70s) he used something called a
Birotron. I don't really know what that was. Anybody know?
Mike D
|
1841.23 | RE .21 | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 13:17 | 5 |
|
Check's in the mail Frank!
Mike D
|
1841.24 | If I had a nickle for each tidbit like this.... | DDIF::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Fri Jan 06 1989 14:01 | 8 |
| The Birotron, which suffered crib-death and never became a real
product, was a Mellotron replacement using a bank of 8-track cartridge
transports. Cheap, stock parts, easy to swap sounds (easy splits,
too!). Brainchild of one Steve Biro. I didn't even know one was made.
This comes from some ancient Wakeman interview.
Eirikur
|
1841.25 | Oldies but goodies... | SYNTH::SEIGEL | SYNTH when? | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:33 | 24 |
| Wakeman used 4 or 5 Birotrons on the Tormato tour. He also used
the RMI KC-II, the Polymoog (of course), and a prophet V.
I still have a suitcase Rhodes from 1976. A great instrument for
practicing at home, a lead weight for gigging. As was my
Mellotron, the Wurlitzer, etc...
RE: - a few, by Umma Gumma, Richard Wright was using
a Farfisa Combo-compact. There's lots of Rhodes, Hammond, and
Wurlitzer scatted all over PInk Floyd albums. Also, for an extra
dose of Minimoog/Arp solina (string ensemble), wish you were here
is the place to go. Shine on You crazy diamond and Welcome to
the machine.
I'll echo what others have said; the primary motivation for
not using these live is that you can get one machine to do
them all, reasonably well, for live purposes. I still use
a Hammond in the studio, but live, a Mirage/DX7 layer is
just fine.
ciao,
andy
|
1841.26 | Wonder why it never caught on...? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Jan 06 1989 16:12 | 6 |
|
Thanks Eirikur, for the info on Birotrons. I thought, with the -tron
suffix, that it was some kind of Mellotron. Sounded much the same
too. Guess that's why!
Mike D
|
1841.27 | misplaced nostalgia | ANT::JANZEN | Mr. MSI ECL Test | Fri Jan 06 1989 17:55 | 21 |
| <<< NOVA::$111$DUA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]COMMUSIC.NOTE;1 >>>
-< ** Computer Music ** >-
================================================================================
Note 1836.18 QX7 Versus MSQ100??? 18 of 18
ANT::JANZEN "Mr. MSI ECL Test" 13 lines 6-JAN-1989 17:52
-< sweet sounds of C-MOS >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget the old home-brew CMOS divider based synths.
note assignment algorithms are unecessary, because
mine can play 60 notes at once forever (with my later power supply
design ;-). Try THAT on your Kurzweil 1000.
I've never heard anything flange better, with harmonics
to 1MHz ;-) (I don't actually remember 4000 CMOS rise times).
It never goes out of tune (unless I flip the quarter-tone switch);
I've played in a museum and at a college outdoor concert.
When I sell my piano, it'll be all I have to play.
it's from that old don lancaster article in radio electronics.
Tom
|
1841.28 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Mon Jan 09 1989 08:39 | 19 |
|
Farfisa examples
"96 Tears" ? and the Mysterians
"She Pays the Rent" Lyres
When I saw ELP at the Yale Bowl Keith Emerson appeared to be using
a C3 with 4 stacked Leslies, the biggest ones in wooden cabs, not
the 'portable' combo cabs. He threw a smaller Hammond (L100?) off
the front of the stage during a solo...what an effect.
Hammond also made a 'Porta B' that was an attempt to make the hauling
around part easier. There were also companies who would modify your
Hammond by splitting the cabinet into parts, to make it easier to
tote around.
CdH
|
1841.29 | Far out mannn... | WARDER::KENT | | Mon Jan 09 1989 09:08 | 10 |
|
We could go in to a long diatribe about fork-in Farfisa's but most
of you have heard it before.
Definitive Hammond track is Gimme Some Luvvin (Spencer Davis) 1965.
Definitive Rhodes is ( Can't think of one) .......
Paul.
|
1841.30 | and Greenflower? Street on Fagen's "Nightfly" | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Mon Jan 09 1989 10:26 | 5 |
| A good phased Rhodes is on "Minute by Minute" by the Doobs.
Another good Rhodes is on Steely Dan's "Goucho".
Richard.
|
1841.31 | Don't Forget Vox | AQUA::ROST | Marshall rules but Fender controls | Mon Jan 09 1989 10:41 | 5 |
|
Re: .28
I think Jeff Conolly of the Lyres would be upset having his Vox
Continental organ mistaken for a lowly Farfisa...
|
1841.32 | VOX Continental much better than Farfisa. | MAY10::DIORIO | | Mon Jan 09 1989 11:16 | 7 |
|
I believe 96 Tears (? and the Mysterians) was also a VOX Continental
organ. Actually, a lot of times when you think you're hearing a
Farfisa, you're really hearing a VOX Continental. It was THE standard
keyboard to use back then.
Mike D
|
1841.33 | Sewed my new blue jeans... | WARDER::KENT | | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:20 | 8 |
|
Definitive VOX conti track is .........
"House of the Rising Sun" Animals (Alan Price)..
Paul.
|
1841.34 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:22 | 13 |
|
Sorry about the VOX/Farfisa screwup. I've never seen ?... and I
saw the Lyres so long ago, I can't remember what he was playing.
The sounds are remarkably similar, to my ears.
re: Spencer Davis
I saw them on the Gary Collins morning show recently. No Hammond...
they were using a Korg M1. Not a bad imitation, but it sounded like
one.
CdH
|
1841.35 | Keep on Running! | WARDER::KENT | | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:28 | 12 |
|
Re - 1
Spencer Davis split up long long ago....
Spencer himself may be gigging with a new band.
Stevie Winwood wouldn't lower himself to an M1....
Witness the superb multi-moog(I think) on "Arc of a Dancer"
And as for good old Muff...
Paul.
|
1841.36 | what's in a name... | SYNTH::SEIGEL | SYNTH when? | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:44 | 10 |
| RE: .-1
"Arc of a Diver", but who's checking...? 8^) But I'm pretty sure you're
right and it's a Multimoog. I think I recall him doing Moog ads around that
time.
More definitives: rhodes - Freeway Jam, solo in Black Cow from Aja...
clavinet - Tank by ELP
andy
|
1841.37 | | TALK::HARRIMAN | Back to the Grind | Mon Jan 09 1989 12:58 | 5 |
|
re: back a few
Emerson used L-100 series beatup organs for show. He had all sort of
toys...
|
1841.38 | Matrix synthesis- an old tradition | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | by an unnamed spokesman | Mon Jan 09 1989 15:08 | 11 |
| Ahhhh the Putney VCS3, with the pin-board... and the joystick... and no
keyboard whatsoever. My first introduction to matrix synthesis.
Wonderful machine! Never needed tuning- because it wasn't tempered
in any sense of the word!
Speaking of matrix synths, the Oberheim matrix machines can modulate
the frequency of an LFO from a ramp or envelope generator. You just
need an Oberbox, DB. :-)
|
1841.39 | And, of course, we still use a real Hammond M3... | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Tue Jan 10 1989 11:56 | 12 |
| Here's something that you could do with a Farfisa that you can't do
on any state of the art synth that I know of....
I used to walk in front of the keyboard players Farfisa (back in about
1970), and hold my guitar near the back plate. The pickups on the
guitar would recieve the oscillator transmissions (I guess that the
Farfisa was badly sheilded), and depending on how I waved my guitar,
I got the raw sounds (sounded like the middle octaves primarily),
somewhat like a Theramin would give you. Great Sci-Fi Spaceship sound.
Not the most useful of effects, but a unique interaction.
Jens
|
1841.40 | Memories.... | EVETPU::EIRIKUR | Hallgr�msson, CDA Product Manager | Tue Jan 10 1989 12:56 | 10 |
| Those Farfisas were really amazing. There was an LC occillator for
each top octave note. You tuned it via turning a slug in the coil.
With a non-ferrous screwdriver, unless like me you used the
trial-and-guess method. I still think the keyboard action was really
nice--very low travel--extremely nonstandard.
Eirikur
|
1841.41 | Hammond/Leslie memories | MUNCSS::BURKE | | Sat Jan 14 1989 06:11 | 18 |
| My fondest memory of old gear is definitely the Hammond/Leslie.
Deep Purple "Child in Time" sticks out.
Uriah Heep "Salisbury", "Gypsy"
Jimmy Smith "Mac the Knife" [no Leslie]
(early) Yes various. I always rated Banks as a better Hammond
player than Wakeman, although the latter was
better technically.
The Peddlers "My way", "In the mood".
Anyone remember the unique effect achieved by slowing/speeding
the Leslie at appropriate chord changes ? Especially with the lower
two drawbars (16', 5 1/4') pulled out. Ahh. I gave up long ago
attempting to emulate this effect on synths.
I think that the effect centred around the fact that the (top) horn
speeded-up/slowed-down much faster than the (bottom) bass baffle.
Lovely.
Jim Burke
|
1841.42 | Leslie show | RAINBO::WEBER | | Thu Feb 16 1989 16:46 | 7 |
| A B-3 player I used to work with took the top off his Leslie cabinet, and
painted the horns and baffles with black and yellow stripes.
It always caused a sensation at gigs, especially when he changed
speeds. Of course, in 1969, everything was considered "far out, man".
Danny W.
|