T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1675.1 | A start point... | TYFYS::MOLLER | TAICS / You Are Number 6 | Fri Sep 16 1988 14:20 | 9 |
| Shure has a cheap series that seem to work pretty well ($30.00 to
$40.00 Brand New!!) for general purpose use. These are made in Japan,
and don't have the high end response that you might like. I have one
& find it works pretty well (especially since I always seem to run out
of microphones when I'm recording anything live). You might also want
stop in to the pawn shops in the area - I've gotten some excellent
deals when I least expected it).
Jens
|
1675.2 | some ideas | ANT::JACQUES | | Fri Sep 16 1988 16:45 | 42 |
| There are notes in the Music note file (I know, it's been down
for a while, but expect it back up hopefully next week when db
returns from his trip), and also in the audio notes file as well.
Heres a few ideas ranging from inexpensive to expensive:
Peavey PVM38's. These mics can be had for $99 including a road
case, 25' cable, clip, and foam screen. For the money they are great.
Good alternative to an SM58 or ATM41. I own 2 of them and they sound
great and are quite rugged. Don't pay more than $99 for them regardless
what some salesman tells you.
Shure SM57. Good for micing drums, amps, and instruments.
Shure SM58. Good vocal mike. Industry standard for the last
20 or so years. Cost about $150 each.
Audio Technica ATM41. A good alternative to a Shure SM58
and priced comparably as well.
Audix ??? A new entry into the mic market. I don't know much
about them.
Beyer Dymanics. I have heard rave reviews about Beyer mics,
but I understand they are fairly expensive. They have a unique
shock-mount.
Crown. Again quite expensive, but used extensively in recording
studios, and they have quite a diverse product line. Crown invented
the PZM (pressure zone) mics. see RS PZM
Sennheiser. Considered by many to be the best. Very expensive.
note: a unique mic well suited for recording acoustic instruments
is the RS (rat shack) PZM mics. These can be purchased for $45 and
modified to make them sound very good. If you would like more info,
I can point you to some notes about them.
Good luck,
Mark
|
1675.3 | a few more thoughts | ANT::JACQUES | | Fri Sep 16 1988 16:50 | 8 |
| I almost forgot Electro-voice. Again they have been making
industry-standard mics for years.
Yamaha and Sony both claim to have excellant mics, but I cannot
comment on either. Why not check em out for the hell of it.
Mark Jacques
|
1675.4 | you better shop around | NEWFUN::GEORGE | | Fri Sep 16 1988 18:34 | 9 |
| Unless you're in a big hurry, don't shell out $150 for SM58's.
They go on sale *regularly* for $99. SM57's likewise are $75 on sale.
Used or pawn shop prices are ~$75 and ~50, respectively.
Wurlies last had them in their ads about a month ago, keep an eye out.
Happy Friday,
Dave
|
1675.5 | Try Radio Shack's other mikes, too... | NCVAX1::ALLEN | | Mon Sep 19 1988 13:06 | 10 |
| Radio Shack used to make a fairly decent cardiod (?) mike which
retailed for about $39.95. I say "used to" because most of the
stores stopped carrying it about three years ago as a stock item.
However, if you can find a store with one or two they are a good
bargain. (I got the pair for $39.95!) They were judged to be a
"best buy" by several audio publications. If you need the model#
I go look it up.
Bill Allen @MPO
|
1675.6 | More on Beyer. | HYEND::GLORIOSO | | Mon Sep 19 1988 23:58 | 9 |
| I've been using a Beyer M-69 for a couple of years with great results
for both studio and live. It's a hypercardiod pick-up pattern
(cuts down feedback problems) and it's a dynamic type. (most of
the others mentioned are also dynamic) I use it mainly for lead
vocals but works fine on guitar and bass as well. It's a good
general all around workhorse. They used to retail for $189 but
I believe that figure is more like $215 now. I paid $100 used
for mine. It's also very heavy and durable.
Good luck, Scott.
|
1675.7 | you should audition some yourself | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Tue Sep 20 1988 09:52 | 25 |
|
The M69 is great. Sort of like an SM58 but one step further. It's
smoother and less peaky.
I use a Beyer M260 ribbon. It's vry flat and soft, with a nice
proximity effect that adds some much needed bass boost to my thin
voice. These are about $275 each but can be found used occasionally.
As for the original noters needs, Audio-Technica makes some nice
low budget mics, I think they're called the Pro series, in the under
$100 range, new. Paso makes a 58 clone (doesn't everybody?) called
the Handler which is in the $60 range and has a very similar sound.
Also, the A-T AT813 is a condenser mic often described as an almost
studio grade vocal mic, that can be found used around $125. They're
very smooth and clean with good overload characteristics.
Mikes really should be chosen by audition. You will sound different
depending which mic you use. For instyance, I sound awful on an
SM58, yet most people sound great. You should really match your
voice to the mic.
CdH
|
1675.8 | Still looking | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Back in Black | Tue Sep 20 1988 11:43 | 5 |
| Thanks for all the recommendations. I've been looking around a
bit, but still haven't really found anything. I appreciate the
help.
Greg
|
1675.9 | AT813 Microphone, a good buy? | SCENIC::BYRNE | Forget the manuals, Print it! | Tue Feb 21 1989 17:20 | 21 |
|
I'm also interested in getting a new microphone. I've tried
a bunch of them at the stores, and am leaning towards purchasing
an Audio-Technica AT813 condenser mike. The price is $140 which
includes the cable and adaptor.
First of all, is this a good price? This is at Wurlitzers in Boston.
Second how would the AT813 compare with say a Shure SM58?, is there
any noticeable difference? Are they any obvious disadvantages
to owning the AT813.
Is the AT813 more adept at picking up vocals, or better at Guitar
or drums etc, than some of other mikes on the market in that price
range? I'm going to be mainly using the mike for 4-track
recording, but I might play out eventually. Would a $300 Sennheiser
mike be worth it, if I'm only recording on a Fostex 250 4-track.
Is this enough questions? I know you just got to hear them to
really tell the difference, but I'm looking for some general rules
of thumb.
|
1675.10 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Wed Feb 22 1989 08:02 | 15 |
|
The AT813 is a condenser mike, the SM58 is a dynamic mike. The price
you have for the 813 is probably the battery powered version. The
phantom powered version is more expensive, but more desireable because
it has more headroom and you don't have to worry about batteries.
The 813 is a great mike, smooth and crisp, but I wouldn't consider it
in the battery version. Too much hassle, and it overloads too easy.
Check out the E/V N/DYM series. The N/DYM 257 is about the price of the
58 and, to my ears, is a big improvement.
CdH
|
1675.11 | EV! | CSC32::G_HOUSE | A mind is a wonderful thing to waste | Thu Feb 23 1989 19:15 | 7 |
| I'd also second the EV N/DYM series mikes. I ended up with an
N/DYM-257 when I finally bought a mike (I started this note...) and
have been very pleased with it. It's got good range and has a hotter
output than most. Side by side with a SM58, the EV sounded much
better to my ears. Cost: around $100.
Greg
|
1675.12 | How do you choose a mike? | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Feb 27 1989 13:12 | 21 |
|
Would any of you care to advise a microphone novice?
I have read all the recommendations here. What I am really
looking for is advice on HOW TO CHOOSE a mike. What do you
look for? How do you test one in the store?
I am looking to buy a vocal mike for use on gigs. I will be using
it from behind my keyboards. I want a low impedance mike with an
on/off switch. My knowledge of mikes is:
* plug one end into the PA
* sing into the other end.
* mikes can be omni/uni-directional
Thanks,
Mark
PS I want a *good* mike. I don't mind spending up to $200 if
need be.
|
1675.13 | Lots of good input & ideas.... | TYFYS::MOLLER | Halloween the 13th on Elm Street #7 | Mon Feb 27 1989 13:27 | 4 |
| There is a fairly extensive discussion of this in the DREGS::MUSIC
notesfile. I don't know the note # however.
Jens
|
1675.14 | Try 'em out. | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Asking if computers can think is like asking if submarines can s | Mon Feb 27 1989 13:31 | 10 |
| Get a headphone mike. Most of the keyboardists I know of move around
too much to stay at a reasonable (i.e. close) distance to their
mike- _unless_ the mike is on a headphone boom.
Some people don't like headphone mikes (they think it's geeky to
look like an air-traffic controller or telephone operator on-stage)
but others like the hi-tech look. It sure makes it easier to set
levels and get a good mix, though!
-Bill
|
1675.15 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Mon Feb 27 1989 14:10 | 7 |
|
E/V N/DYM 757. I think it's the nicest $200 mike going. If you like the
condenser sound then the AudioTechnica AT813 is real good. But like
buying ice cream, it has to be right FOR YOU.
CdH
|
1675.16 | | TALK::HARRIMAN | HiHats from Hell | Mon Feb 27 1989 16:06 | 12 |
|
Speaking as a gigging keyboard player, a headset mike is *wonderful*
if you can stand looking like an air traffic controller. Just stay
away from the monitors ;^)
Seriously, though, you may spend over $200 to go that route.
.-1's recommendation of the AT813 is also good, strictly speaking
from a vocalist's point of view. I have two of those which are used
as "nice" rehearsal mikes (we don't always bring our mikes out).
/pjh
|
1675.17 | not WHICH mike, HOW to select one. | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Feb 27 1989 18:25 | 25 |
| Thanks for the advice so far but you all seem to have missed the
question. What I want to know is not WHICH mike to buy but HOW to
select one. When you go into the store WHAT do you do to test one.
WHAT do you listen for to decide if you like it or not.
Suppose I am A/B-ing some mikes on one of those mike turtles.
Should I make sure the salesman has set a flat EQ? Does it matter?
BTW re: back a few... Thanks for the DREGS::MUSIC reference. I
found note 518 on microphones, however it was mostly on microphone
recommendations (ie: "I like brand X model YYY). Again this is not
the kind of information I am asking for. (Is it a stupid question???)
I do recommend this note however it is *very* informative. Seems
to cover about two dozen mike types!
re: .16
The idea of a headset mike is one I haven't though of. Cost? I'm
working off of one keyboard stand, so I haven't had much of a problem
"finding" the mike. What do you do if you have to sneeze? Or if
you have to shout to a fellow band member when you have both hands
full of keys? Couldn't a headset mike be a problem?
Thanks,
Mark
|
1675.18 | | TALK::HARRIMAN | HiHats from Hell | Tue Feb 28 1989 09:28 | 28 |
|
re: .-1
The whole issue of buying a mike is not unlike buying stereo speakers.
You have to buy something that's "works well" with you, and something
you can stand the sound of. In addition, some mikes are more specialized
than others, i.e. the headset mikes. Maybe they're for you, maybe not.
The point is, I found one that works for me. I have had many mikes
in my keyboard/gigging career. This one does what I need, which is
to provide condenser-quality sound and give me freedom of movement
on stage (I have two keyboard racks, total of four keyboards on
stage, currently. I have had as many as six).
You gotta try them out. Go into a music store and get them to plug you
in. Get a private, quiet demo room. Play piano and sing through one.
Keep trying until you find one you can live with. It might not be
a headset (maybe you don't need one), but it'll probably be a cardioid
pattern (no feedback).
Oh yeah... regarding coughing, etc. with headsets: The Lord provides;
there is such a beast as a cough button which is mounted on the side
of the headset. Push on, push off. Mine also has a little bright red
indicator to tell me it's live, too. Mounted on the mike cartridge,
just within eyeshot but not visible from anywhere else. Like I said,
shop until you find what you want.
/pjh
|
1675.19 | More disinformation. | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Hiding from the Turing Police | Tue Feb 28 1989 10:27 | 38 |
| What mike sounds good and works well with you is a lot like what
brand of underwear you like... It depends on too many factors to
be easily quantified.
I like mixing it when people I'm mixing use the headset mikes, because
they don't mess up their level by distance changes. A headset mike
tends to have a pretty crisp response too, lots of high end, which
is good especially for male vocals which may need a little "kicking"
with EQ or exciter otherwise.
On the other hand, I like to use a LARGE-apeture (like the U5x type)
for things with abundant (overabundant?) high end, like flutes or
really high-pitch vocalists. This is counter to common "wisdom" that
high frequency -> small apeture, but I find that it makes flutes much
more "natural" sounding in the mix.
Now what do I do when, say, a female vocalist with a great top end is
in the mix? Well, (fortunately) I've never had to mix one who also
played AT THE SAME TIME, and WHILE STANDING UP. I don't know if I'd go
for a large-apeture on a floor boom or have her try a headset and then
make it OK by EQing it. I guess a lot would depend on the vocalist's
self-control and ability to not pop her P's, hisss her esssses, and not
eat the mike while screaming.
------
Try out a few of the mikes- you also may want to try hearing how
they _record_, not just sound to you subjectively "live". That
way you hear what the audience hears, without the additional bone
and soft-tissue conduction that you hear while singing into monitors
"live".
Just have the shop hook up a decent tape deck and record your vocals
test, then listen to the test playback. (telling what mike you
are using in the recorded audio makes this test go a lot smoother).
-Bill
|
1675.20 | some mic selection ideas | SUBSYS::ORIN | Cuckoo Nest escapee | Tue Feb 28 1989 10:59 | 63 |
| < Note 1675.17 by KEYBDS::HASTINGS >
-< not WHICH mike, HOW to select one. >-
> select one. When you go into the store WHAT do you do to test one.
> WHAT do you listen for to decide if you like it or not.
> Suppose I am A/B-ing some mikes on one of those mike turtles.
> Should I make sure the salesman has set a flat EQ? Does it matter?
Some thoughts on mic selection...
1. I've found that the main factors in choosing a mic for a singer (not myself)
were...
sensitivity
How sensitive is the mic to sound pressure? Is it going to match up well with
the PA/mixer you are using? Can you get close to the mic and scream, or is
it going to distort/feedback? Is it going to overdrive your mixer, or pick up
every little sound coming from musicians behind you?
directional characteristics
It is very important to get a directional mic for live performing vocals.
Otherwise feedback is going to be a major problem. I chose a Sennheiser for
this reason ($500).
frequency response
What are the tonal qualities of your voice? Is it harsh, nasal, mellow, deep,
tenor, bass, etc? Are you going to be yelling and screaming R&R or singing
top 40s softrock? You may want a "warm" sounding mic which means good freq
response in the 200-800 hz range.
pop and sssss rejection
You may have to use a windscreen to reduce popping, but this will reduce
frequency response to the highs. When you test the mic, this is an important
consideration. You don't want it to sound muffled.
proximity
How close can you get to the mic without feedback and excessive popping when
you sing a word that starts with the letter "P" or "T"? What is the tone quality
like if you back off from the mic when singing loudly?
Unless you go to a large store, probably in Boston, the chances of them having
a private demo room are slim. The best test area is with your own band in a
typical setup configuration. Perhaps you can persuade the store to let you
try out several mics on approval before making the purchase. Usually, if you
let them put your credit card thru their machine, give them full details
on how to reach you, and/or know the salesperson well, this is not a problem.
This is one of the obvious advantages of dealing with stores and getting to
know their sales people. Having someone with a "good critical ear" listen to
you from the audience side is important. You probably will not be able to hear
yourself any better than whatever monitors you are using sound like, which is
usually not very well. I don't think the person singing into the mic can make
a valid decision on how the mic is going to sound to the audience. None of the
singers in any of the bands I played in were ever able to IMO.
hope this helps, good luck!
dave
|
1675.21 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | Deeper in Debt | Tue Feb 28 1989 12:04 | 10 |
|
The one thing that has kept me from considering a headset mike
for stage use is that I typically use distance between me and the
mike to help balance the vocals. If I sing lead I get close, if
I sing backup I stand back from the mike some...this can become
very important if you have a strong (loud) singing voice.
for what it's worth
dbii
|
1675.22 | Mike help | NRPUR::DEATON | | Mon Dec 04 1989 17:47 | 11 |
| Does anyone have a frequency response chart for either the Shure SM58,
the Shure SM57 or the AT818? I need to be able to use one plugged into an audio
analyzer and need to compensate for the mike's response.
OR...
Can anyone recommend a good, relatively cheap (under $100) mike with
extremely flat response for use with said frequency analyzer?
Dan
|
1675.23 | wireless vocal mikes??? | QRYCHE::STARR | Spontaneity has its time and place. | Wed Jun 26 1991 17:13 | 7 |
| I have a question about wireless vocal mikes (posted in both MUSIC and
COMMUSIC). I'm looking at two used systems for the same price - does anyone
have any comments on either system, good or bad??? The two I'm looking at
are Nady 201-HT and Sampson Concert Series RH-1.
thanx,
alan
|