T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
957.1 | I can wet it???? | JAWS::COTE | Set you on dumplings... | Wed Sep 23 1987 13:34 | 33 |
|
Glad to see you finally got this "reply" vs "write" thing down...;^)
Anyhow, I use my Rhodes 73 ALL THE TIME!!! It's probably the most
used piece of gear in my studio. Let's see...
1. Stack another keyboard on top of it
2. There's a little flat area on either
side of the keyboard; just right for
putting a beer on.
3. The distance from the front of the white
keys to the front of the black is just the
width of my ashtray, so I leave it there.
4. There's a nice pen/pencil holder behind the
keys...
5. The arched top makes a nice percussive sound
when given a decided whack...
6. Mine is micro-tuned so that opens up some
interesting avenues to explore...
7. The cat likes to sit on it.
8. Nice sustain pedal, but it's sys-ex so I
don't get a chance to use it much.
Edd
|
957.2 | where are we ? didn't I just post this ? | SALSA::MOELLER | | Wed Sep 23 1987 17:17 | 9 |
| Several noters still own Rhodes, and are using them primarily as
equipment stands, I believe. I sold my cherry '73 73 for $250 and
was happy to get it. I also own an MKS-20 and a sampler.. so for
studio/live performance, unless there is a well-tuned grand there,
acoustic piano is a thing of the past.
However, I have a beautiful Haddorf spinet in my living room.
karl moeller
|
957.3 | They've gone about as far as they can go | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Wed Sep 23 1987 18:00 | 20 |
| My Roland RD-300 with builtin MKS-20 "plays" and sounds just like a Rhodes
in my opinion. That is not only does it sound like a Rhodes, but
it seems to respond to the way I play it just like a Rhodes. The
feel of the keyboard is slightly different but that doesn't bother
me.
And in fact, this is what 'sold' the RD-300 to me.
I remember seeing it in a store, sitting down, turning it on, striking
an Eb13 b5 and being able to hear every note in the chord clearly
and going "ahhh". Then I turned the chorus on,... "ouuuuuuu".
Then they told me the price,.... "damn". But I got it anyway.
I think its this 'chordal acuity' (the ability to pick out all the
notes in a complex chord) that makes the Rhodes so popular. I can
think of no other instrument that even compares to the Rhodes in
that respect.
db
|
957.4 | Electric pianos are definitely dead. | MAY20::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Wed Sep 23 1987 19:58 | 28 |
| The rhodes (and wurlies) are especially dead, since they are resonably
easy to mimic accurately with a variety of synths, and the action
ain't so hard to emulate either.
The acoustic piano, on the other hand, has an action which is still
resonably hard to imitate (but there are those of us who don't give
a hoot about the precise nuances of a piano action), and the sound
is also quite complicated.
For technical wizzes, it is good to grow close to a particular action,
and there are lots of piano wizzes. The Rhodes players, on the other
hand, were the type of people who just by merit of the fact that they
were playing it in the first place, were willing to change actions, and
would do so again for a step up in portability and versatility.
All except Tom Scholtz and Chuck Mangione (and the latter may have
moved away from it while I wasn't looking).
So the Rhodes is dead, but I don't think the piano will ever be.
It will probably become like the harpsichord.
Steph
|
957.5 | Rhodies unite! forever! | JON::ROSS | Micro-11: The VAX RISC | Thu Sep 24 1987 19:08 | 17 |
|
Me gotum cute little *Steinway* (gloat gloat) in the livin-room,
which is nice to diddle occasionally (I do). The mks20 seems
so much easier to get onto tape, however....
Dave, I cant believe you have an RD-300 that feels like a rhodes.
Sure sounds like one....agreed. If I had an RD (or mkb1000) that
had action like a rhodes, it would be another keyboard stand like
mine or Edds. More expensive perhaps...
I always likened playing the proverbial rhodes to a baseball player
who's next up: you swings about 4 bats instead of one. Each rhodes
key is like 4 little baseball bats...
good synth stand. Good muscle toner...
|
957.6 | A Rhodes is (not) a Rhodes, be it called by any other name | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Fri Sep 25 1987 12:39 | 11 |
| > Dave, I cant believe you have an RD-300 that feels like a rhodes.
By coincidence, I stopped in at Daddy's in Nashua. They have TWO
Rhodes. The action on one is completely different from the other.
One is very stiff, one is very light (like my RD).
The conclusion is that what you may think of as a Rhodes action
depends on what you've played because there is a wide difference
between different Rhodes.
db
|
957.7 | When is a Rhodes not a Rhodes? | DYO780::SCHAFER | Dragons is *so* stupid ... | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:38 | 11 |
| RE: .5, .6
You may not be comparing apples with apples ... pre-CBS Rhodes' tend
to be quite arthritic, while post CBS Rhodes' (ike mine) tend to have
a lighter touch.
Speaking of Rhodes, I'm selling my Stage 73. It's never been on the
road (i.e., used at home for a few years), and looks like I bought it
yesterday. Any suggestions as to what I oughta ask for it?
brad
|
957.8 | Paid <$200 for mine... | JAWS::COTE | Hollywood! I know your middle name! | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:53 | 4 |
| Don't mean to sound like a smart-@$$, but you'll be doing good if
you get $250....
Edd
|
957.10 | What is a Rhodes worth these days ? | HPSCAD::GATULIS | | Wed Sep 30 1987 17:45 | 5 |
| Can't exactly say what you should ask for your Stage-73 but Union
Music in Worcester has a brand new one for $400.
Frank
|
957.11 | Oh, yeah...I remember those. | FROST::HARRIMAN | bzzzzzzzzztTHWACK!hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm | Thu Oct 01 1987 00:15 | 18 |
|
Re: .0
I never really liked the Rhodes; I was a Wurly kind of guy. However
I gave it to my mother (really I did) a couple of years ago when
I picked up my JX-3P (which wasn't even good at doing pianos). Now
between an ESQ-1 and a DX-100 I can do tiney sounds like crazy,
mellow piano/electric piano combinations, and all sorts of sensitive
Mr. Roger's Neighborhood sounds. I also let go of my old Hammond
because a Polysix is soooooo much lighter.
To play out with large keyboards which only do one or two things
is really being purist or maybe even a bit reactionary. Unless your're
very large and strong or have lots of friends for roadies, of course.
I also have a Kawai EP-308 electric grand in my living room - I
don't take it out to play. Just keeps me in perspective, I guess.
/pjh
|
957.12 | another rhodes story | BEOWLF::BARTH | | Fri Oct 02 1987 13:30 | 14 |
| As far a Rhodes prices go, I sold mine about 2 years ago for $400
(or $450 - can't remember). I did the job, though; there was no
affordable portable synth that did anything close to a piano (i.e.,
in feel, velocity sensitivity; not necessarily in sound), so the
Rhodes was the best alternative.
It was said that Wurlitzers has a brand new one for $350? I didn't
think they were made anymore.
I do miss the action, though; mine was one of the "later" models
that had a really good - not mushy - action. The Dx doesn't cut
it as far as that goes.
Ron
|
957.13 | Question about the piano preamp - Model 73 | PKENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Wed Dec 06 1989 12:53 | 13 |
| I bought a Fender Rhodes for my son to learn piano. It was a used
instrument and I bought it on recommendation of his piano teacher and
his school music teacher. I have a question. I hooked the unit
up to a Heathkit stereo amp. from the little preamp in the piano.
I'm not sure if the connection is optimum, i.e. the impedance is
matched, etc. I'm using the phono input, which something like 67Kohms
for an input impedance. What I don't know is, what is the output
impedance of that little preamp in the piano. There's a bit of noise
on the line, I think because the cable is way too long for a phono type
input. I imagine that most people have their piano hooked up to a
band-style amplifier which is properly (I guess) matched to the piano.
I have the service manual for the instument which explains just about
everything except that.
|
957.14 | no way jose | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Wed Dec 06 1989 14:10 | 10 |
|
You not only have a level mismatch as well as an impedance mismatch,
you are using the phono inputs RIAA eq circuit and destroying the sound
of your Rhodes.
You have to find a line level input like a tape input, or CD input. Or
even the play half of the tape monitor loop.
CdH
|
957.15 | Must have been a different model than mine | CSC32::MOLLER | Nightmare on Sesame Street | Thu Dec 07 1989 11:28 | 6 |
| What Pre-amp is this?? I've owned a 77 key and an 88 key Rhodes
and neither had a pre-amp in them (This was in the early to mid
1970's). I just plugged them into either the P.A. or my Fender
Bassman Amplifier & played.
Jens
|
957.16 | Amp | PKENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Thu Dec 07 1989 12:25 | 10 |
| The only input on the amp which gives reasonable levels of volume
is the phono input. I tried all the others. I realize that the phono
equalization is wrong for the piano. I'm just looking for a figure for
the output impedance of that little preamp.
Re. -.1
There's a little battery operated preamp which sits behind the
nameboard on the piano. I don't have any circuit info on it.
Peter
|
957.17 | you can taste the difference | SWAV1::STEWART | There is no dark side of the moon... | Thu Dec 07 1989 20:05 | 14 |
|
Maybe it's time to change the battery in that little preamp?
|
957.18 | Battery's okay | PKENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Fri Dec 08 1989 12:47 | 5 |
| Re. -.1
Battery's okay. I gave it the tongue test - it's a 9v battery.
Peter
|
957.19 | My 2.4 cents on the Rhodes | CACIQE::NUNEZ | Edgar Nunez | Fri Dec 08 1989 17:26 | 10 |
| There were a couple of modification to the stock Rhodes which replaced
the volume and tone controls. I installed one many moons ago
which was an active EQ, the other that I know of was a EQ with a
build_in Chorus.
Both of them had very low output and I suspect that a Home
stereo would need a lot of gain to reproduce at a decent volume
and probably because of the gain hum will be also reproduce.
Edgar (who_is_getting_the_rhodes_out_of_the_closet)
|