T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
747.1 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | DENVER A Long Way | Wed Sep 22 1993 13:38 | 7 |
| Pickering is quite pleasant ...
Good bus service to GO train station where commuter trains can take you
right downtown, or 401 to DVP to downtown (yuchh ... but better than
some journeys)
Stuart
|
747.2 | questions... | TROOA::BROOKS | | Wed Sep 22 1993 14:00 | 12 |
|
- Why do you ask? The answer may determine our responses.
- For renting, generally first and last month's rent is the norm.
- for a 'small house' expect 600-900 depending on features.
- Are you stuck on the suburbs? Why not look for a place within the
city so that you can avoid the commute?
Doug
|
747.3 | Say "radiation" real fast | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Sep 22 1993 16:09 | 3 |
| In pickering, you don't have to turn on the lights to see in the dark.
|
747.4 | Thanks so far..... | LARVAE::MOORE_A | | Wed Sep 22 1993 17:37 | 21 |
| I think I must be missing some vital information about Pickering. Is it
anything like Cumbria in England where farmers hang a fresh sheep from
the ceiling every night instead of a light bulb?
I hadn't considered close to downtown because we'd like to live
somewhere relatively quiet - never having been city folks before...
I've only seen downtown Toronto so far and although it's a great place
(especially watching the Blue Jays hammer the Mariners) I would
fancy something a little bit more rural. These comments wouldn't apply
to Vancouver of course, which seems to be the most laid back city
possible! Even the cars wait patiently at intersections for the
pedestrians to pass - in London (England) you'd expect to survive
approximately 30 minutes if you took the same attitude to traffic!
Thanks for the info so far.....
Regards
Andrew
(Basingstoke, England)
|
747.5 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | DENVER A Long Way | Wed Sep 22 1993 18:20 | 25 |
| Well, I moved from England back in '81 and moved to Ottawa, which I far
prefer to Toronto in terms of lifestyle ... I found that I could not take
advantage of the things Toronto had to offer because of cost and commute
times ...
For example, a concert starts at say 8. You leave work at 5 to go home.
Home by say 6 - 6:15, change, grab food and head back downtown and you're
lucky to be there for 8.
That said, it still is a great place for a large city.
As to Pickering ... it has a large nuclear power facility ... to be sure,
but in the 18 months I lived there, I sure didn't hear of anyone glowing
in the dark. Moreover, I actually felt more comfortable there than I
did when I lived about 6 miles away in Scarboroough. Pickering is about
15 miles as the crow flies from Downtown Toronto. People in Metro Toronto
hardly have a clue about the plant that sits on their very doorstep. When
you live in Pickering, you are aware of it ... there is a town evacuation
plan ... there are plans to distribute iodine tablets in emergency. A few
miles away in Scarborough, there are no such plans, they are totally
oblivious of the reactors.
Still a good place to live though.
Stuart
|
747.6 | more on Pickering | TROOA::BROOKS | | Thu Sep 23 1993 13:06 | 14 |
| As much as Scarborough is slagged it is UPWIND from Pickering, and that
perhaps explains the difference in attitude.
An important note, Pickering in general is far from being rural. What
little farm land left is nothing like English countryside (all rustic
and stuff), and will likely be developed into a new community (I forget
the name, starts with an 'S' I think) in a few years. Pickering is
similar to Ottawa in development.
If you are looking for real rural, you may wish to look north to
Richmond Hill/Newmarket. These places are on the GO line (train) and
are also developing fairly fast.
Doug
|
747.7 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | DENVER A Long Way | Thu Sep 23 1993 13:24 | 15 |
| But Doug, nowhere will you find the same idea as English rural in
Ontario ... Just doesn't exist. The closest you get to English rural
is down in New England, and even that is still vrey different.
Parts of Pickering are still more small town ... but the new parts
are decidedly urban. And then renting in an Ontario rural area is
difficult aroudn Toronto ... you've got to get out towards Barrie
or Orillia , or maybe Cheltenham ... although that area is developing
heavily too.
It's hard to escape Toronto's urban sprawl, because the because the
people who dislike the urban sprawl move out of town, and take the
sprawl with them!
Stuart
|
747.8 | Clarification | LARVAE::MOORE_A | | Thu Sep 23 1993 13:49 | 7 |
| I guess my use of the word 'rural' was a little misguided!
Maybe I could characterise the sort of place we're looking for
as one where building goes on more in two dimensions than three.
Andrew
|
747.9 | | TROOA::SOLEY | VMS, just say NO! | Thu Sep 23 1993 13:54 | 13 |
| A lot depends on where you'll be working. Its generally a bad thing to
have to drive all the way though the city on a commute, so If you going
to be working, for example near Pearson Airport, Pickering would be a
poor choice.
1.5 hours commuting time gives you a fair range unless you're working
right downtown. Keep in mind that things stay pretty dense east and
west from Toronto along the lake, it might get more suburban but hardly
rural unless you also head northeast or northwest. There are several
areas of Metro Toronto that are practically as quiet and suburban as
anything you're going to get in the bedroom communities, Leaside or old
East York Township (where I live), South Etobicoke for example or if
you really want rural head for the area around Cambridge or Guelph
|
747.10 | Where rural hits the wilderness | TROOA::MCRAM | Marshall Cram DTN 631-7162 | Thu Sep 23 1993 14:25 | 18 |
|
Newmarket is more affordable, and still has a small town atmosphere.
It's about as far north as you can go and still commute in reasonably
well. As for rural, that's a matter of opinion, but the wildlife
around it are starting to convince me that this ain't Scarborough.
Yesterday I was stuck in a traffic jam on 404 while they lifted a dead
moose off the road. A weeks back a black bear was hit about the same
spot. I'm not sure what's next, but the cats need a self-defense
course.
Rentals can be had in most outlying spots, few towns don't have
apartments these days. Most though go for the vast tracts of
Mississaga and Brampton in the west, or Oshawa and Pickering, etc in
the east.
Marshall
|
747.11 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Sep 27 1993 09:23 | 11 |
|
My brother and sister-in-law live in Schomberg, RR3, they think it's
pretty rural. I think RR3 means "rural" route 3. My brother works in
different places in Toronto, fixing apartments, and my sister-in-law
works in Toronto General in the middle of Toronto.
My sister-in-law uses the Go-train, my brother drives his van.
However, when I last visted, they were in an apartment in Toronto,
I haven't seen Schomburg.
Heather
|
747.12 | Nicer near L.Ontario | BREW11::JOHNSTON | takin' it day by day! | Tue Oct 12 1993 09:16 | 14 |
| For best location in the 'burbs around T.O., it's got to be Oakville.
Easy access to Downtown and close to the Lake - which in my view (when
I went from the UK to Canada, and now back in the UK), makes a
difference.
It's nicer nearer the Lake.
I always used to find it interesting that if you lived West of Yonge
Street you never ventured or knew much about the City East of Yonge
Street, and vice versa....
CJ
|
747.13 | "Countryish Towns North of Toronto" | CSLALL::TRAINOR | | Thu Dec 09 1993 14:15 | 21 |
|
Hi,,
Be patient with me this is my first time writing in notes.
My husband and I really like the City of Toronto last summer, that we
are interested in moving there, we are so sick of the crime in the
states, That we would like to raise our daughter (who is 2) in a nice
area. We are looking North of Toronto, near the lake. We are not that
familiar with the area, Is there anyone who can tell me the price range
of houses, and some nice "countryish" towns north of Toronto will be
appreciated. I know crime is everywhere but at least Canada has
a strick gun control, (at least that's what I hear.) I think the U.S.
has too much freedom and not enough justice! Well enough with my harsh
words, any information will be great!
Thanks for your help!
Carrie
(A parent who is concerned about raising her childs safety)
|
747.14 | | KAOFS::M_COTE | Don't Tread on us, Bloco | Thu Dec 09 1993 14:37 | 3 |
|
If you liked Toronto, You're going to Love Ottawa!
|
747.15 | some Toronto info... | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | What is the strategy today? | Thu Dec 09 1993 23:45 | 33 |
| re: .14
Yes Ottawa .... nice city in the middle of nowhere designed to keep all
our federal politician and the infrastructure that supports it as far
away as possible ;-)
re: .13
There are many fine communities within Toronto itself and what is known
as Metropolitan Toronto. Outside of Toronto, there are a large number
of cities that are to a large extent bedroom communities of Toronto.
For example:
West: Mississauga, Oakville
East: Pickering, Ajax, Whitby
North: Richmond Hill, Thornhill
South: None unless you like living in a boat on Lake Ontario 8-)
Not sure from your note what you mean by "near the lake north of
Toronto"?? Toronto sits on the north side of Lake Ontario. The next
large lake to the north is Lake Simcoe with communities like Barrie on
its shores. It is , a bit of a long commute to Toronto.
Home prices tend to get cheaper the further you get from Toronto and
have been dropping during the current recession. It would help if you
could indicate what size/type of home you're looking for. I'm most
familiar with the Mississauga area. There you can get a 2400 square
foot new home (4 bedroom, double garage, family room, etc) in the $230K
Cdn range. The lot sizes at this price are usually 40x110 feet (not
large once the house is put on the site.
Hope this helps....
|
747.16 | Clarification... | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | What is the strategy today? | Thu Dec 09 1993 23:47 | 3 |
| Upon rereading .13 I realized you're looking for "countryish" towns.
You'll need to go further afield then the bedroom communities
(suburbia).
|
747.17 | Another vote for 'the valley' | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Dec 10 1993 10:13 | 14 |
|
If you are looking for a lowered rate of violence, I am not
sure that Toronto is the place to move to, big city, big city
crime. [although probably not at the same level as an American
town]
As well, in order to live in rural Toronto one must travel
a brutal distance everyday if you work in downtown Toronto.
Now Ottawa is different, low crime, clean and you can live rural
and only have to commute half, to a quarter, as far as you would
in T.O.
Charlie
|
747.18 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Fri Dec 10 1993 11:02 | 8 |
| Before you set your heart on coming North, make sure that you
will be allowed to ... check with the Canadian Embassy nearest to
you if there are any work visas or whether you must immigrate etc.
Note that usually when on a work visa, only one member of the family
can get a work visa, unless you both meet the necessary criteria.
Stuart
|
747.19 | Toronto, never, but maybe Aurora... | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Chrome Sweet Chrome | Fri Dec 10 1993 13:10 | 12 |
|
I, too, would not consider Toronto "safe". And, as recent events
have proven in Canada, UK and the US, strict gun laws do not
necessarily mean less violent crime. People get shot stabbed and
beaten (and get their noses bitten off too, even in Ottawa!)
I would suspect that only a small fraction of what goes on actually
makes the papers, but that's off the subject.
Safety is largely made up of common sense, with a dash of luck.
Pat
|
747.20 | re: nose bitten off | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Dec 10 1993 14:21 | 6 |
|
The name of guy who had a taste for proboscis was Benoit Robillard,
haven't I seen his name in this notes conference...I heard he
is a rowdy on the ice but this is ridiculous. ;-)
Charlie
|
747.21 | Ever watch American 6:00 local news ?? | KAOFS::D_STREET | Virtue is relative. | Fri Dec 10 1993 14:24 | 9 |
| >> And, as recent events
>>have proven in Canada, UK and the US, strict gun laws do not
>>necessarily mean less violent crime
I seriously doubt you could get a statistic to prove Canada has as
much violent crime per capita as the US. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Derek.
|
747.22 | Read more carefully | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Chrome Sweet Chrome | Fri Dec 10 1993 15:20 | 39 |
|
Re: Derek..
Not suggesting for a minute that the violent crime rates are
comparable.
California, New York City, Detroit, Boston and D.C. all have
stricter firearms legislation than Canada's. Would you walk the
streets alone in any of these places? The base noter commented
on strict gun control, and my response was to be careful about
equating gun control to low crime rates. It's ALOT more complicated
than that. Perhaps our prisons are more comfortable, so criminals
like to stay longer 8*).
Heck, my wife won't even walk from the local school to home (about
3 blocks) after dark..and this is in Kanata. A person was recently
stabbed in the back while making a night deposit at the Hazeldean
Mall. We regularly (monthly) get "visitors" in our backyard, which
is gated and hedged. Up to now, the infrared triggered lights have
scared them off, but what if it's more than kids someday?
Last year I personally caught someone in my garage, believe me
both of us were VERY surprised. Turned out he was a 40 year old
derelict on welfare looking to supplement his income from what
he could scrounge off my workbench. He had a long list of unanswered
B&E charges from Alberta and B.C., but the local OPP said it wasn't
worth shipping him back to face them, so they gave him a ticket for
trespassing and let him go. Before I phoned the cops, he told me he
was a law student...ya sure.
Even now, we have a mysterious white van circling our neighborhoods
looking for young children.
I just wanted to make sure the base noter moved to Canada for the
right reasons. We can always use more taxpayers.
Pat
|
747.23 | Judge, Jury, and Executioner... what a country!! | KAOFS::D_STREET | Virtue is relative. | Fri Dec 10 1993 15:49 | 19 |
| POLAR::ROBINSONP
>>California, New York City, Detroit, Boston and D.C. all have strict
>>gun laws.
I see this one in SOAPBOX all the time, I won't watse my electrons
trying to explain to the gun loving Americans that there are sooooo
many guns available in the US that they are beyond solving the problem
with "anti-gun laws". They seem to assume that people are not able to
freely go to an area that has no such restrictions, get a gun, and go
back to the city/state with the anti-gun laws. So they state that gun
laws don't work. I suggest it is their logic processors that are not
working. If you already have guns everywhere, then stopping additional
guns is not going to help alot. But hey, to them it is a right to shoot
the guy trying to steal your car, even though there is no death penalty
for car theft.
Derek.
|
747.24 | I deleted SOAPBOX | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Chrome Sweet Chrome | Fri Dec 10 1993 16:05 | 13 |
| Derek:
Uh, um...I think we agree. Except maybe for the gun loving Americans
part. Canada has comparable per capita gun ownership rates to the US,
unfortunately it's not possible to compare per capita criminal
gun ownership rates. They just won't come forward and be counted,
just as the knife wielding ones won't either. Have you ever read
about the prohibition? Then you know how sucessfully inanimate
objects can be controlled, and how behaviors will adjust to
compensate. I think alot of tax money is spent on enforcing things
that cannot be controlled (did someone mention cigarettes?)
Pat
|
747.25 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Mon Dec 13 1993 11:28 | 9 |
| | <<< Note 747.23 by KAOFS::D_STREET "Virtue is relative." >>>
|
| I see this one in SOAPBOX all the time, I won't watse my electrons
| trying to explain to the gun loving Americans that there are sooooo
I'd be more worried about wasting neurons if I were you.
Glenn
|
747.26 | It's still safer north of 49�. | POLAR::RUSHTON | տ� | Mon Dec 13 1993 12:23 | 237 |
| In response to the comment about crime rates in the US of A and Canada,
I have collected some replies from Note # 198. Although the Macleans
article is based on research done about 6 years ago, I doubt much has
changed when comparing both countries.
Cheers,
Pat
<<< KAOSWS::$1$DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CANADA.NOTE;1 >>>
-< True North Strong & Free >-
================================================================================
Note 198.20 Canada as 51st U.S. state - Aye or Nay? 20 of 68
KAOM25::RUSHTON "Inspired lunacy" 112 lines 28-JUN-1989 10:00
-< Right from the horse's mouth! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the base note has stirred up quite a bit of interest and
verbiage on this subject, I thought that I might as well pick up a copy of the
'offending' magazine. It's the July 3, 1989 edition of Maclean's and the
entire copy is devoted to 'a portrait of two nations'. Also, to try and
answer an earlier query about the actual questions posed in the poll, I've
pulled the following from the magazine:
*******************************************************************************
1000 Canadians and 1000 Americans were polled, the results are accurate
to within 3.3 percentage points 19 times out of 20.
"Would you strongly favor, favor, oppose or strongly oppose Canada
becoming the 51st state of the United States with full congressional
representation and rights of American citizenship?"
Canada United States
Strongly oppose 54% 10%
Oppose 31% 22%
Favor 12% 54%
Strongly favor 2% 12%
No opinion 1% 3%
*******************************************************************************
Here are some additional statistics that may be of interest:
(To Canadians)Which one of these words, in your view best
describes the ideal Canadian?
Tolerant 38%
Independant-minded 27%
Peaceful 26%
Aggressive 3%
Clean 3%
Sexy 1%
No opinion 1%
The same question was posed to Americans to describe the ideal
American with the following results:
Independant-minded 52%
Tolerant 21%
Aggressive 12%
Peaceful 12%
Clean 3%
Sexy 1%
No opinion 1%
To outsiders, the distinctions between Canadians and Americans often
appear so subtle as to be almost meaningless. But the following comparisons
show that while there are numerous similarities between the two countries,
there are also some startling differences:
The Justice System
Crime Rates
Canada United States
(per 100,000 population)
Homicide 2.5 8.3
Violent sexual crime 5.3 37.4
Burglary 1,245.1 1,329.6
Robbery 87.9 212.7
Motor vehicle theft 399.7 529.4
******************************
Law enforcement
Canada United States
Number of police per 2 2.1
100,000 population
% of police assaulted 11 16.8
Police officers killed 3 73
in line of duty in 1987
Drug arrests in 1987 169 385
(per 100,000 population)
*********************************
Firearms
Canada United States
Homicides by firearms 31.2 59.1
(as % of total homicides)
Homicides by handgun 8.9 43.7
(as % of total homicides)
Homicides by rifle 9.7 4.3
(as % of total homicides)
Homicides by shotgun 7.2 6.1
(as % of total homicides)
Estimated number of guns no estimate 200 million
in the country (incl. 60 million
handguns)
Number of registered 923,125 no registration
restricted weapons
*****************************************************************************
<<< KAOSWS::$1$DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CANADA.NOTE;1 >>>
-< True North Strong & Free >-
================================================================================
Note 198.23 Canada as 51st U.S. state - Aye or Nay? 23 of 68
KAOM25::TOMKINS "This MIND left blank INTENTIONALLY" 10 lines 28-JUN-1989 16:40
-< Stats are fun, eh? What's your interpretation? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to Mr. Rushton, Canada's 4th largest city is Los Angeles.
Apparently more than 1 million Canadians call LA their home.
Probably the reason the rifle homicide percentage is higher here
in Canada, than in the US is that we don't arm our citizens with
Handguns (A weapon of convenience for settling arguments). I too
would think twice about running down the street with Mr. Rifle in
hand, it's so obvious, I'd probably get nicked. On the other hand,
if I owned a Handgun that was under my shirt, well, Blow him away
Johny.
<<< KAOSWS::$1$DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CANADA.NOTE;1 >>>
-< True North Strong & Free >-
================================================================================
Note 198.24 Canada as 51st U.S. state - Aye or Nay? 24 of 68
KAOM25::RUSHTON "Inspired lunacy" 49 lines 28-JUN-1989 17:36
-< More from the horse's mouth >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, furry creatures, here are a few more to warm the cockles:
"Do you own a handgun?"
Canada United States
Yes 3% 24%
No 97% 75%
"Would you send your children to the other country to attend
university?"
Canada United States
Yes 41% 58%
No 58% 39%
Comments about Canada from well-known Americans:
"I don't even know what street Canada is on." - Al Capone
"Take Canada, and wipe out her commerce." - President Ulysses S. Grant
"...that great Republic of Canada." - repeated twice by President
Dwight Eisenhower
**********************************************************
"Would you like to live in the other country?"
Canadians Americans
Yes 27% 42%
No 73% 56%
No opinion 2%
***********************************************************
Quotes from Allan Fotheringham:
"Americans think medicare is a socialist menace. Canadians
think the lack of an American medicare system is barbaric."
"Canadians think that American beer is lemonade. Americans
think that our drinking laws came from Ulan Bator. Both are
right."
"Americans think that professional hockey is a vulgar form
of roller derby, demeaned by violence. Canadians point out
that a dozen or so American high school football players die
in action each year whereas in the history of the National
Hockey League only one man, Bill Masterton, has ever been
killed."
<<< KAOSWS::$1$DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CANADA.NOTE;1 >>>
-< True North Strong & Free >-
================================================================================
Note 198.26 Canada as 51st U.S. state - Aye or Nay? 26 of 68
GERBIL::BOHLIG 12 lines 19-JUL-1989 13:45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Maclean's poll issue is quite interesting reading.
Having lived in both countries, I saw a lot of truth in the statistics.
Sure the numbers may be off here and there but the attitudes reflected
seem genuine.
I think the best quote in the magazine is from Margaret Atwood,
she said that the 49th parallel is not the world's longest undefended
border but rather "the world's longest one-way mirror."
Mike.
<<< KAOSWS::$1$DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CANADA.NOTE;1 >>>
-< True North Strong & Free >-
================================================================================
Note 198.38 Canada as 51st U.S. state - Aye or Nay? 38 of 68
MURP::HINXMAN "Figments of a deranged imagination" 18 lines 26-JUL-1989 17:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re .37
> So, let me ask this: IS Canada ALREADY the 51st state? If not, what did I
> fail to observe during my visit? When I return to Canada in the future
Well, I'm not a Canadian either, but the most obvious answer must
be the streets were safer. Then there was the customs man checking
that you were not bringing in any firearms, as there is gun control
in Canada.
The murder rate for Canada is much (an order of magnitude?) lower
than that for the U.S.
Another cultural difference, which I think was mentioned earlier in
this note is the Canadian perception that universal health care is a
good thing.
Is Canadian culture different? Well, they have three major political
parties, all to the left of the U.S. Democrats.
Tony
|
747.27 | More fodder for ya | POLAR::ROBINSONP | Chrome Sweet Chrome | Mon Dec 13 1993 14:40 | 8 |
|
Re: Firearms ownership..
My comments were drawn from David B. Kopel's "the Samurai, The
Mountie and the Cowboy: Should America adopt the Gun Controls of other
Democracies" Prometheus Books,1992.
The other Pat
|