T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1547.1 | | ASICS::EDMUNDS | telegraph pole elbow | Wed Sep 25 1991 06:58 | 3 |
| Which leg? This is very important.
K.
|
1547.2 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Keefy: *Mister* 12% | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:07 | 5 |
| RE: -1
Why?
Laurie.
|
1547.3 | Something to do with the ozone layer perhaps | ARRODS::WHITEHEADJ | Bibble, Yo, Blah | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:34 | 5 |
| Re .0
Are you *sure* it was blood and not the sun crying?
Jane.
|
1547.4 | Of course, I would say this... | PLAYER::BROWNL | Loz, this stuff tastes like water! | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:40 | 8 |
| Doubtless someone will come up with a "mystic" explanation, but I
suggest it was from a bird flying very high, which was out of easy sight
by the time the "blood" landed. It's difficult to spot something small
in all that sky.
No mystery at all.
Laurie.
|
1547.6 | | ASICS::EDMUNDS | I'm going to explode on the A2 | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:51 | 4 |
| Very unlikely, Laurie. If the blood had fallen that far, it would have
congealed. Wendy, was it still warm? And what blood group was it?
K.
|
1547.7 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | spooky ! | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:54 | 12 |
| I don't know who you guys are, but you're obvioiusly not taking this
highly strange incident seriously....
I was worried it might be a portent of death and was hoping for a
more comforting explanation from those who might know.
Maybe it represents a symbol of fertility ?
Thanks
Wendy
|
1547.9 | | ARRODS::WHITEHEADJ | Max the Bunny rides his bike | Wed Sep 25 1991 08:57 | 6 |
| I still think it might be something to do with the ozone layer and the
hole in it and all that. There are all sorts of strange things reported
in the papers regarding the ozone layer, or perhaps it's something to
do with acid rain. Who knows?
Jane.
|
1547.10 | | ARRODS::WHITEHEADJ | Come 2 Wilson | Wed Sep 25 1991 09:07 | 27 |
| re< Note 1547.8 by COMICS::BELL "The haunted, hunted kind" >
Frank,
May I suggest you read my reply .9 which was entered exactly the same
time as your .8. In case it had escaped your notice, my note was
not intended to wind anyone up. I have far better things to do with
my time. *If* I did intend to be humourous, as opposed to serious,
then, being well aware with notes etiquette, I would not have hesitated
in adding a smiley to my note.
I, and I am sure many others, feel deeply that there are numerous
amounts of people in this world who are totally unable to accept that
others see things in different ways and hold different opinions
and beliefs. We are all entitled to live our lives that way and there
is nothing more irritating than people trying extremely hard to
persuade others that they are hold the "correct" belief.
If your note is indicative of the reception I can expect in this
conference, one that I happen to find extemely interesting and worth
reading, then this conference has lost one noter, maybe a read-only-
at-the-moment, but one who feels she could share her experiences or
ask questions of others. Let's hope others don't feel the same way.
Live, let live and value differences.
Jane.
|
1547.11 | Seriously ... | 5848::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Wed Sep 25 1991 09:27 | 17 |
| Re .0, .7 (Wendy):
"Blood" from the sky is a well documented phenomemon, one of many that are
called Fortean, after Charles Fort, who collected reports of strange, often
inexplicable phenomena. Usually there are whole showers of "blood" rather
than a solitary drop.
Other reported showers include frogs and fish. If you'd like to read up on
Fort's reportage, try his _Book of the Damned_, which should be available
in libraries (I think Dover Press still sells it in a hardcover collection of
his four books).
There may be no "mystic" parameter to this at all.
If there is, the field's wide open.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1547.12 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | spooky ! | Wed Sep 25 1991 09:58 | 9 |
| Thanks Steve for taking me seriously .. I've also heard of frogs falling
from the sky (bible's plague being the most famous) ...
This wasn't a wind up at all .. the blood really did fall on my leg !
I wasn't particularly worried about it - just thought it was strange.
Wendy
|
1547.13 | | ARRODS::WHITEHEADJ | I am a copyright � | Wed Sep 25 1991 10:59 | 7 |
| Re .11
That's amazing. I've never heard of that before. So, it's obviously
happend to lots of other people before. I'll try and get hold of a
copy of that book at my local library. Could be interesting reading.
Jane.
|
1547.14 | Misperceptions. | CADSYS::COOPER | Topher Cooper | Wed Sep 25 1991 12:22 | 35 |
| Let's keep in mind several things:
1) Humor has generally been considered acceptable in this
conference -- even on serious subjects (as long as there is not a
clear indication, of course, that humor would be completely out of
place, e.g., in discussions of painful personal incidents). It is
generally considered as "friendly banter", rather than not taking
the subject seriously. In a verbal discussion it is hard for their
to be more than at most a couple of threads going. Humor would be
out of place because it is distracting. In NOTES, on the other
hand, all previous statements still exist so those who have nothing
"serious" to reply with can reply with friendly humor in attempt to
keep DEJAVU a cheerful "place" to be -- leaving room for more
serious replies.
2) There was no indication that humor would be considered out of
place in this topic.
3) This conference welcomes a wide range of opinions. It is not
the "property" of those who hold any particular viewpoint. Good
manners and respect for those with contrary beliefs is highly
desirable but not required. Beliefs are fair game, only personal
attacks are actually forbidden. It is very easy, however, to mis-
perceive an attack on an idea as an attack on the person who
expressed that idea.
4) It is easy to misperceive an unexpected opinion as sarcasm since
tone of voice is lacking (the converse is also true, and perhaps a
more frequent problem). Readers should take statements at face
value if they possibly can, and look for the least objectionable
interpretation to any statement. (I know this is hard, long-time
readers of this conference can probably remember a number of
occasions where I fell down on this).
Topher
|
1547.15 | Bloody Odd! | CSLALL::FARNHAM | | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:20 | 6 |
| Well, Topher . . . If you are quite finished!
To the writer of the original note: Do you suppose that the blood
could have come OUT OF your leg?
|
1547.16 | Following along ..., | 5848::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:51 | 19 |
| When I responded a few replied ago, I carefully enclosed "blood" in quotation
marks because all we know for sure is that whatever it was looked like blood.
It was presumably a red liquid, but without examination via chemical or optical
means, there's no way to determine exactly what it was.
As I noted earlier, there have been many reports of strange things falling from
the sky, and Fort, who was not without a certain amount of humor suggested
that if one giant (flying) being was predated upon by another, the wounded
firts beast might drip, leading to a "showers of blood" report.
One explanation for at least some of the "rains of blood" is that some red
material, possibly red clayey soil, might occasionally get sucked up in
whirlwinds, where, if the conditions permitted, it might be divided into small
particles that would be captured in forming raindrops, that would then look like
blood upon striking objects on the ground.
On the other hand, one never knows....
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1547.17 | Open minded? See note 1541.12 | SAHQ::BUTLERVE | | Wed Sep 25 1991 16:25 | 10 |
| Oh goodness...I just finished reading note 1541.12-13 (for the past
3 hours! - I'm real busy today!) and if you have an open mind it
could offer another unique explanation. (Note 1541.0-.10 is very
long reading so you might just jump over to .12 - explanations of
various animate and inanimate objects falling from the sky are
discussed.)
Ya-tah-hey!
Bunkie
@;)
|
1547.18 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | spooky ! | Thu Sep 26 1991 05:34 | 18 |
| RE .15
The blood did not come OUT of my leg ! ;-) I'm not blind ! ;-)
Also - it couldn't have fallen from a great height as Laurie suggested,
if it had, it would have splattered on my leg with greater force.
No, instead it rested as a globule measuring about 1 inch across, neatly
on my leg. It was blood, I smelled it and tasted it (yeuch).
I'm as down to earth and sceptical as the next person. I don't put any
theories forward myself, but this is the first wierd experience that
I've personally encountered.
I don't mind not knowing what the origin was, I tend not to believe in
supernatural forces, but I do enjoy reading the theries offered (thanks).
Wendy
|
1547.19 | More info could be helpful. | FORTY2::CADWALLADER | Rifle butts to crush you down... | Thu Sep 26 1991 06:37 | 21 |
| Hi Wendy,
Perhaps some more info could be helpful. I am thinking particularly
whether you were in close proximity to a source of said "blood" or
not, i.e. if you were within a few feet of other people, the blood
could have come from this source for whatever reason - e.g. some
unfortunate experiencing a nosebleed or injury (perhaps sneezing, I
don't know). If however there was nothing in close proximity in any
direction, then it is very odd. If it is a "natural" source we could
assume that the source was unobserved; perhaps it was at the side or
behind you, although when the blood hit your leg - you would naturally
look to the sky first due to your posture.
As was mentioned, odd object falling from the sky are well documented
but I agree that such objects are usually in groups, not solitary
items. Very strange ;'/
So, were there any likely sources close enough? ("wherever")
- JIM CAD*
|
1547.20 | Physics 101 | CSLALL::FARNHAM | | Thu Sep 26 1991 15:26 | 10 |
| Re .18 Re .15
To get a one-inch globule, you have to pour a liquid carefully from a
short distance. You cannot get an isolated globule of that size from
random "raindrops". Experiment by pouring a small amount of water on
your desk.
|
1547.21 | | VERGA::STANLEY | what a long strange trip it's been | Thu Sep 26 1991 15:47 | 1 |
| Wendy... if it ever happens to you again... DON'T TASTE IT.
|
1547.22 | Continuing ... | 5848::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Thu Sep 26 1991 17:21 | 8 |
| Re .21 (Mary):
>Wendy... if it ever happens to you again... DON'T TASTE IT.
But if you can, collect it in a clean container for analysis.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1547.23 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | spooky ! | Fri Sep 27 1991 03:05 | 25 |
| (ooer !)
This is getting interesting ! OK, The only reason I put this note in here is
because I had already explored all logical explanations and could find none.
The circumstances were as follows:
I was beside a lake, far enough away from the actual water to negate any
possibility of a "splash". I was lying on the grass, on my side reading.
There were no other people, or animals at the lake (it was one of those
out of the way places) and I was on my own. I was naked, so there's no
possibility of illusion on material for example. I was not menstruating, so
any theory related to that is out.
The blood globule *was* large, that's why I've mentioned it, and the fact
that it rested neatly on my leg, and not splashed as if fallen from a height
prompted me to wonder where it had come from.
There were no birds about - really ! The area appears to be devoid of them.
Certainly there were none around at the time that this happened.
Ok - why should I not taste it ?
Wendy
|
1547.24 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | I despise the use of TLAs! | Fri Sep 27 1991 05:35 | 8 |
| As to the size, blood always seems more than it is. Most people vastly
over estimate the quantity.
>Ok - why should I not taste it ?
It might not have been blood and could have been poisonous.
Jamie.
|
1547.25 | | ICS::CROUCH | Sugar Magnolia blossoms slowly | Fri Sep 27 1991 08:41 | 5 |
| Even if it was blood it could have been tainted. The consequences
for a small taste could have been pretty large.
Jim C.
|
1547.26 | Continuing ... | STORIE::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Fri Sep 27 1991 10:15 | 26 |
| Re .23 (Wendy):
>This is getting interesting ! OK, The only reason I put this note in here is
>because I had already explored all logical explanations and could find none.
I trust the "rain of `blood'" citations might have opened up another possibility
among your alternatives.
> .............................................. I was naked, so there's no
>possibility of illusion on material for example. I was not menstruating, so
>any theory related to that is out.
If it were on the outside of your leg, as I thought I understood, then it
wouldn't matter anyway. I presume you checked your leg for even very tiny
puncture wounds? (Just to rule out an insect bite. Being naked, while often
pleasant, means more of one's skin is vulnerable.)
If you'd been able to collect it, an analysis could determine whether it was
blood; and if blood, whether it was human blood; and if human blood, how closely
it might have matched yours.
Now unlike some of our fellow conference members, I don't entirely rule out a
"supernatural" explanation. But that shouldn't be the default.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1547.27 | The proof is in the tasting. | CSLALL::FARNHAM | | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:31 | 2 |
| Hmmm . . . Do seagulls get AIDS? ? ?
|
1547.28 | Safety factor | STORIE::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:40 | 7 |
| Re .27:
>Hmmm . . . Do seagulls get AIDS? ? ?
Only very careless seagulls. ;-)
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
1547.29 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | spooky ! | Mon Sep 30 1991 04:32 | 8 |
| (no puncture, no wound, no graze on my leg).
(No trees nearby, no birds flying overhead).
Do seagulls live 500 km inland ?
Wendy
|
1547.31 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | whoppeeee !!! | Mon Oct 28 1991 16:56 | 9 |
| re -1
Gosh, well, since then I have been sick so I guess that's that mystery
cleared up.
Aries is the sign with the knees, and I'm an Aries.
Wendy
|
1547.32 | | WBC::BAKER | Joy and fierceness... | Thu Oct 31 1991 13:16 | 7 |
| re: 1547.31
HOO78C::BOARDS
>Aries is the sign with the knees, and I'm an Aries.
Actually, Capricorn is the sign governing the knees/shins; Aries
rules the head.
|
1547.34 | | HOO78C::BOARDS | whoppeeee !!! | Sat Nov 02 1991 02:53 | 8 |
| Gosh thanks Wal !
I'm not looking to get preganant yet (I guess I have to find a man first),
but when I do, can I come back here to get some advice ?
Wendy
dob: 17 April 1958 (time: 08:20)
place: Cambridge, England
|
1547.36 | Moving along ... | HELIX::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift | Mon Dec 23 1991 13:08 | 11 |
| Getting back to the event:
A large globule of blood landing on one's leg should have been felt at impact.
Since it didn't appear to be, then maybe it just "appeared" there. Since Wendy
was close to the lake, if she'd been wading, it's possible some sort of
leech might have attached itself and dropped off, leaving a very small open
wound. Blood could have seeped out and pooled, resulting in the globule.
Just a random thought.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|