T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
95.1 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:43 | 5 |
|
Ya mean I'd have to pay to see the Swedish bikini team? Beer ads are
among the better ones on TV.
brews
|
95.2 | BDA says Legislation my hasten Pay Per View | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:43 | 16 |
| I received a mailing from Don Sutton (ex-pro athelete) and the Beer
Drinkers of America the other day. Now that they successfully defeated
the 400% increase in the tax on beer (or so they say), they have set
their sights on a new goal -- defeat legislation to add warning
messages to beer ads on TV.
BDA claims that the warning messages, which could comprise at least 10
sec. of a 30 sec. slot would cause the beer companies to pull all of
their TV ads (if they aren't just legislated out of existence like the
hard liquor and cigarette ads were) and that would accelerate the move
to Pay per View sports telecasts since beer companies are the prime
sponsor of major sporting events.
The BDA will be lobbying against this legislation and is trying to get
folks to sign a statement that will be sent to local senators and reps
to help defeat the bill.
|
95.3 | huh | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:44 | 2 |
|
wha happened?
|
95.4 | You're just too fast for me Brews | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:47 | 4 |
| � wha happened?
I realized I wanted to add something else to my original reply, so I
deleted it, edited it, and reposted it.
|
95.5 | | SKEWED::MCKAY | | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:48 | 3 |
| Mac how did you end up on the beer_drinkers_of_America.dis list 8*)
Jimbo
|
95.6 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MarkyMark&MargeSchott-KindredSpirits | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:55 | 4 |
| Hey I got the same thing Mac. Obviously this is a very
distinguished mailing list.
/Don
|
95.7 | wonder what list they bought our names from | FRETZ::HEISER | WHERE'S MY PROZAC!?!? | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:15 | 1 |
| No big deal since I received one too.
|
95.8 | No way I'm gonna back some ex-Dodger wimp... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:16 | 7 |
|
Don Sutton as Beer Drinkers of America spokesman? Couldn't they have
gotten somebody a bit more uncouth, like maybe Dick Butkus or Mike
Dikka?
glenn
|
95.9 | A'yuh | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:18 | 5 |
| Heard on the radio at lunch time that the New Hampshire Legislature is
looking into reopening the issue of building a sports complex in southern
NH to try and lure the Celts and Broons north of the border.
BIll
|
95.10 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:18 | 2 |
|
Mickey Lolich would fit the model better.
|
95.11 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:21 | 15 |
| I figure they got my name from one of the homebrewing supply shops I'm
buying from. I can recall giving at least 2 of them my name and
address.
� Don Sutton as Beer Drinkers of America spokesman? Couldn't they have
� gotten somebody a bit more uncouth, like maybe Dick Butkus or Mike
� Dikka?
Interestingly enough, they didn't mention which sport Don played.
Probably wanted to make sure it didn't look like MLB was involved. As
far as "uncouth" goes, they went out of their way to point out they are
a "couth" organization. They allegedly fund a "Drink Smart" type of
campaign. In fact most of the gist of the mailing was that Congress
considers beer drinkers to be sinners and use that to justify upping
the "sin" tax on beer.
|
95.12 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:23 | 5 |
|
Beer drinkers are couth. It's the Jack Daniels drinkers that cause all
the problems.
brews
|
95.13 | | SALEM::DODA | Bend over America | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:24 | 5 |
| I got the mailing also.
I would think Dale Ellis would be a logical choice.
daryll
|
95.14 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Searching for the little Dougie | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:24 | 8 |
| re NH building a sports complex
NO WAY. THis will just bring Mass people up here and it will
mean they will try to take our guns away and make us wear seat
belts and get our teef cleaned and it will mean a global police
state and did I mention they'd take our guns away.
JD_as_NH_Small_town_paper_Letter_to_Editor_writer
|
95.15 | | SALEM::DODA | Bend over America | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:27 | 4 |
| Nah, they wouldn't like it up here anyway, not enough guvmit for
em.
daryll
|
95.16 | So, anybody catch the Simpsons last night (sponsored by Duff) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:49 | 16 |
|
> As far as "uncouth" goes, they went out of their way to point out they
> are a "couth" organization. They allegedly fund a "Drink Smart" type of
> campaign.
Yeah, most of your beer advertising is aimed at the sophisticated,
one-beer-with-dinner-only crowd. That's obviously why they're so
concerned about such irresponsible advertising laws, cuz most
responsible beer drinkers know all about the dangers anyway, and
don't want graphiics and stuff blocking the Swedish bikini team on
their screen. Does anybody really believe that beer companies will
pull their advertising from sports events? That and Don Sutton is all
they've got...
glenn
|
95.17 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:56 | 9 |
| �Does anybody really believe that beer companies will
� pull their advertising from sports events?
No, but I would believe that legislation could be passed that would
prohibit them from advertising the same way tobacco and hard liquor was
forced to stop advertising.
I imagine the same gloom & doom warnings over no more free sports
broadcast came about when the Marlboro man was banned from TV.
|
95.18 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Know new Taxrifices | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:58 | 4 |
|
I think Glen is right. Maybe Steve Howe could be the spokesman.
brews
|
95.19 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MarkyMark&MargeSchott-KindredSpirits | Fri Feb 19 1993 14:16 | 6 |
| I think a Garden in Cow Hampshire would be great. The parking
and concessions would probably be cheaper and the people in Boston
who think it's a divine right to have teams and make obscene profits
off them would be in for a huge comeuppance.
/Don
|
95.20 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Searching for the little Dougie | Fri Feb 19 1993 14:31 | 110 |
| <<< HYDRA::DISK_NOTES$LIBRARY:[000000]DAVE_BARRY.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Dave Barry - Noted humorist >-
================================================================================
Note 728.0 Truth in Advertising 4 replies
CIMNET::RENNIE 104 lines 16-FEB-1992 10:43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVERTISING YOU JUST CAN'T BUY
by Dave Barry, Pulitzer Prize winning columnist
Copied from The Boston Sunday Globe, February 16, 1992
I like beer. On occasion I will even drink a beer, to celebrate a
major event such as the fall of communism or the fact that our refriger-
ator is still working.
So you'd think I'd be receptive to TV beer commercials. Most of
these have the same plot: Some guys open some beers, and instatntly
the commercial is overrun by friendly seminaked young women resembling
Barbie but taller and less intellectual. If you just got here from
Mars, you wouldn't know, from watching these commercials, that beer is
meant for internal consumption. You'd think it was a chemical Hot Babe
Attractant, similar to what moths use to locate each other so they can
mate. You'd think that the Swedish Bikini Team was constantly prowling
the sountryside, sniffing the air for a whiff of Old Suburbs Of Cleve-
land Beer, or whatever brand it is they're allegedly attracted to.
What bothers me is, in more than 20 years of opening beers with
guys, I have *never* seen the Swedish Bikini Team show up. Almost
always, the teams that show up in beer-drinking situations consist of
guys who have been playing league softball and smell like bus seats.
Maybe, to avoid misleading consumers, the beer manufacturers should be
required to make realistic commercials. For example:
(As the commercial opens, some guys are sitting around in the
woods, holding cans of beer.)
FIRST GUY: You know guys, it just get any better than this.
(Nothing happens.)
FIRST GUY: (raising his voice): *I said, you know guys, it just
doesn't get any better than this.*
(Nothing continues to happen.)
SECOND GUY: There sure are a lot of moths around here.
THIRD GUY: This beer tastes like llama spit.
* * *
Speaking of realism in advertising, Michael Jordan should be re-
quired to make a commercial in which he tries, and fails, to jump over
the pile of money that Wheaties pays him to pretend that breakfast
cereal has something to do with his basketball ability.
And while we're at it, I want somebody to explain the current
magazine ad campaign for Timex watches. You probably remember the old
Timex ads, starring John Cameron Swayze, in which professional watch-
abuse technicians would strap a Timex watch to a boat propeller, or a
jackhammer, or a British soccer fan. The watch would then be subjected
to a severe beating, after which the technicians would hand it to John
Cameron Swayze, who would hold it up to the camera and say, in a
dramatic voice: "It broke." At least that's what I assume happened
the first 35 or 40 times. But eventually they'd get a watch that was
still working, and John Cameron Swayze would say: "Takes a licking and
keeps on ticking!"
That was an advertising campaign that I could understand without the
aid of narcotics, in stark contrast to the current Timex campaign, sam-
ples of which have been sent in by a number of alert readers. These ads
consist of photographs of people wearing Timex watches; superimposed on
each photo is a paragraph telling you about some horrible thing that has
happened to the person. For example, one ad features a photo of an at-
tractive woman, with the following paragraph, which I swear I am not
making up:
"Louisa Murray was eating a snadwich when a bowling ball fell off a
ledge three stories above and hit her in the head. Doctors gave her a
one in a million chance, but she fought back and last spring graduated
from college. The ball did leave 'a little dent' in her head. Louisa
is wearing a striking Timex women's fashion watch. It costs about $50."
When you, the consumer, read this, a number of questions naturally
come to your mind, including:
>There was a bowling ball on a ledge?
>Was this a suicidal bowling ball?
>Or was she eating the sandwich at some kind of new theme restaurant?
("The Eat 'n' Get a Skull Dent Cafe.")
The ad offers no explanation. Other Timex ads feature a rock
climber who "fell 85 feet and landed on her tailbone"; a man who "was
attacked by a 1,200 pound Great White Shark" that "tore open his entire
upper torso: and a scuba diver who "was sucked into an offshore water
intake pike for a nuclear power plant." Each victim is modeling a
Timex watch. I don't know about you, but the message I get from these
ads is: "Wear a Timex watch, and *something very bad will happen to
you."* At the drugstore, I find myself edging away from the Timex
display case, which I fugure must be a powerful disaster magnet. Any
moment, a Great White Shark could come lunging out from behind the
counter, holding a bowling ball.
I don't mean to suggest here that all advertising is misleading or
incomprehensible. There are many informative ads for excellent
products, especially the products advertised in this newspaper, all of
which I personally recommend and endorse and use in my home. So do my
frequent houseguests, the Swedish Bikini Team.
|
95.21 | Another one... | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Searching for the little Dougie | Fri Feb 19 1993 14:41 | 122 |
| <<< HYDRA::DISK_NOTES$LIBRARY:[000000]DAVE_BARRY.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Dave Barry - Noted humorist >-
================================================================================
Note 252.0 note 248 before the censors got to it 6 replies
OBLIO::WADE 116 lines 12-AUG-1986 15:43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My sister sent me a copy of this article from the Washington Post. I had
it here waiting until I found the ambition to type it in, so when I saw
this I quickly checked to see if it was the same. NO! The Carolina
Observer seems to have cut it pretty heavily, so I have edited the
missing parts back in. We can't have chicken**** papers cutting up Dave,
can we now.
================================================================================
Note 248.0 Beer commercials No replies
ATLAST::NICODEM "You're never alone with schizophre" 71 lines 7-AUG-1986 09:27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Re-printed from the Carolina Observer]
Beer Commercials Inspire Warm, Patriotic Feeling
> [ title in WP ] Shake Hands and Come Out Drinking
by Dave Barry
Lately I've been feeling very patriotic, especially during
commercials. Like, when I see those strongly pro-American automobile
commercials, the ones where the winner of the Bruce Springsteen Sound-Alike
Contest sings about how The Pride Is Back, the ones where Lee Iacocca
himself comes striding out and practically challenges the president of
Toyota to a knife fight, I get this warm, proud feeling inside,
the same kind of feeling I get whenever we hold routine naval maneuvers off
the coast of Libya.
But if you want to talk about REAL patriotism, of course, you have
to talk about beer commercials. I would have to say that Miller is the
most patriotic brand of beer, "born and brewed in the U.S.A.," and the
men who drink it in the commercials are American men, the kind of men who
aren't afraid to perspire freely and shake a man's hand. That's mainly
what happens in Miller commercials: burly American men go around,
drenched in perspiration, shaking each other's hands in a violent and
patriotic fashion.
You never find out exactly why these men spend so much time shaking
hands. Maybe shaking hands is just their simple straightforward burly
masculine American patriotic way of saying to each other: "Floyd, I am
truly sorry I drank all that Miller beer last night and went to the
bathroom in your glove compartment." Another possible explanation is
that, since there are never any women in the part of America where beer
commercials are made, the burly men have become lonesome and desperate
for any form of physical contact. I have noticed that sometimes, in
addition to shaking hands, they hug each other. Maybe very late at
night, after the Letterman show, there are Miller commercials in which
the burly men engage in slow dancing. I don't know.
I do know that in one beer commercial -- I think this is for
Miller (although it could be for Budweiser, which is also a very
patriotic beer) -- the burly men build a house. You see them all getting
together and pushing up a brand-new wall. Me, I worry some about a house
built by men drinking beer. In my experience, you run into trouble when
you ask a group of beer-drinking men to perform any task more complex
than remembering not to light the filter ends of cigarettes.
For example: In my younger days, whenever anybody in my circle of
friends wanted to move, he'd get the rest of us to help, and as an
inducement he'd buy a couple of cases of beer. This almost always
produced unfortunate results, such as the time that we were trying to
move Dick "The Wretch" Curry from a horrible fourth-floor walk-up
apartment in Manhattan's Lower East Side to another horrible fourth-floor
walk-up apartment in Manhattan's Lower East Side, and we hit upon the
labor-saving concept of, instead of carrying The Wretch's possessions
manually down the stairs, simply dropping them out the window, down into
the street, where The Wretch was racing around, gathering up the broken
pieces of his life and shrieking at us to stop helping him move, his
emotions reaching a fever pitch when his bed, which had been swinging
wildly from a rope, entered the apartment two floors below his through
what had until seconds earlier been a window.
This is the kind of thinking you get with beer. So I figure what
happens, in the beer commercial where the burly men are building the house,
is they push the wall up so it's vertical, and then, after the camera stops
filming them, they just keep pushing, and the wall crashes down on the other
side, possibly onto somebody's pickup truck. And then they all shake hands.
But other than that, I'm in favor of the upsurge in retail
patriotism, which is lucky for me because the airwaves are saturated with
pro-American commercials. Especially popular are commercials in which the
newly restored Statue of Liberty -- and by the way, I say Lee Iococca
should get some kind of medal for that, or at least be elected president
-- appears to be endorsing various products, as if she were Mary Lou
Retton or somebody. I saw one commercial strongly suggesting that the
Statue of Liberty uses "Sure" brand underarm deodorant.
I have yet to see a patriotic laxative commercial, but I imagine it's
only a matter of time. They'll show some actors dressed up as
hardworking country folk, maybe at a church picnic, smiling at each other
andeating pieces of pie. At least one of them will be a black person.
The Statue of Liberty will appear in the background. Then you'll hear a
country-style singer singing:
"Folks 'round here they love this land;
"They stand by their beliefs;
"An' when they git themselves stopped up;
"They want some quick relief."
Well, what do you think? Pretty good commercial concept, huh?
Nah, you're right. They'd never try to pull something like that.
They'd put the statue in the foreground.
---------------------------
[ After typing in the 30% that got cut, it seems like the Carolina
observer cut anything that might offend any of their patriotic
advertisers or their patriotic country folk!
I'm getting a glimmer as to why some of Dave's stuff seems wimpy compared
to the really funny (and occasionally offensive) stuff. When was the
last time you saw anything funny on network TV? ]
|
95.22 | BOO to house new Garden? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 22 1993 16:33 | 12 |
| VNS COMPUTER NEWS
Boston - Mayor Ray Flynn touts Roxbury site for arena
{The Boston Globe, 14-Feb-93, p. 1}
Mayor Flynn yesterday touted as "almost a perfect location" for a new Boston
Garden sports facility a 17-acre site along Melnea Cass Boulevard in Roxbury
if plans for a new facility at North Station fall through. In an interview
after touring the Roxbury site, now occupied by Digital and Stride Rite,
facilities that are soon to close, Flynn said, "It really is to me the best."
"If they were to build a new Boston Garden on another location than the
existing location, this is the location I'd have preferred. It's almost a
perfect location," Flynn said.
|
95.23 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Let's not be L7... | Mon Feb 22 1993 16:51 | 5 |
| I don't believe a word of it. It's just mayor Flynn paying
lip service to the Roxbury community instead of doing anything
constructive.
/Don
|
95.24 | Flynn's a blow hard | AD::HEATH | The jinx is broken, Sox '93 Champs | Tue Feb 23 1993 06:46 | 11 |
|
Yea, I read in one of the Boston Papers over the weekend about that.
The funny thing about it was that the first article on the page had
to do with Flynn wanting to take DEC to court about the "implied
contract" with the city to provide jobs, using the Flynn Michigan
vs GM as precedence. The very next article was the one about
touting the very same site for the new Garden. Are any of these
guys for real???
Jerry
|
95.25 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Let's not be L7... | Tue Feb 23 1993 11:32 | 14 |
| Mayor (for life),(is the camera on) Flynn is well aware that the
trend in arenas is building them in suburban settings, not in the inner
cities and the chance of Roxbury being the site for a new Garden is about
the same as Clinton picking Rush Limbaugh for his cabinet. But given his
terrible track record with minority issues he grabs this opportunity to
grandstand and look like he gives a darn about the economic climate in
Roxbury. Now when the Jacobs say no to a Roxbury site (assuming the last
deal is indeed history), and he will, Flynn can point the accusatory finger
towards Buffalo instead of the mayor's office. If Flynn really wanted a
new Garden he should quit using the issue as campaign material and get to
work. Course real work doesn't get him photo ops on the local six o' clock
news.
/Don
|
95.26 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Peter Principle in action | Tue Feb 23 1993 11:52 | 13 |
|
Yup, it's a win-win situation for Ray. He can't possibly be held
responsible should the Garden deal fall through. In fact, he might
actually benefit politically from the public anger at Beacon Hill.
And by proposing the Roxbury site, a PR move as /Don so aptly pointed
out, he at least proposed a way to keep the teams in Boston and he's
tossed the minority community a bone - a rubber one, but a bone none-
theless. If there's enough public outcry, which I think is what Jacobs
is banking on, thn the lawmakers will *have* to get it done or face
an out-the incumbents movement on the scale of the post Anita Hill
fallout in Washington. The Celts and Bruins will eventually end up
in a new Garden. In Boston. In North Station. They will NEVER have a
home in NH. Maybe a temporary one in Worcester but never NH.
|
95.27 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 25 1993 16:47 | 2 |
| Apparently the pols are breathing life back into the New Boston Garden
plan.
|
95.28 | A miracle. | SALEM::DODA | Bill says to electorate: Just say Baa baa | Fri Feb 26 1993 08:50 | 4 |
| I went out and checked the sky for that star after I heard last
night....
daryll
|
95.29 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 01 1993 09:49 | 6 |
| The Garden management is promising some big things once the New Garden
is finished. One of the management team was on WBCN the other night
saying that NHL and NBA All Star games are being investigated. It
sounded like the NHL game was pretty much a done deal and they are
negotiating with the Celtics and the NBA for the basketball All Star
game.
|
95.30 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Paying for Reagan/Bush years | Mon Mar 01 1993 09:52 | 6 |
| Won't be able to have the NBA all-star game until the Celts
get an All-Star on the squad.
Ta-boom.
JD
|