[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference back40::soapbox

Title:Soapbox. Just Soapbox.
Notice:No more new notes
Moderator:WAHOO::LEVESQUEONS
Created:Thu Nov 17 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:862
Total number of notes:339684

366.0. "Oscars ??" by GIAMEM::HOVEY () Tue Mar 28 1995 11:24

    
    
    	Oscar night...any opinions out there ?
    
    		recipients...
    
    		Lettermen....
    
                presentations...
    
    		acceptance speeches....
    
    		boring....same old, same old...
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
366.1Carefully avoided before going to bedMOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Tue Mar 28 1995 11:263
>    		boring....same old, same old...

Uh-huh.
366.2CSLALL::HENDERSONFriend will you be ready?Tue Mar 28 1995 11:309


 Didn't watch it and don't really care...




 Please get the apostrophe out of the title ;-)
366.3PEKING::SULLIVANDNot gauche, just sinisterTue Mar 28 1995 11:322
    re .2
    Unless it's a bar...
366.4USAT05::BENSONEternal WeltanschauungTue Mar 28 1995 11:3439
    
>    	Oscar night...any opinions out there ?
    
>    		recipients...
 
    Was soooo glad that Gump won best director, picture, and actor at
    least.   
    
>    		Lettermen....
    
    His opening monologue was tired and not funny.  He felt compelled to
    belittle Gingrich to raucous applause from the audience.    
    
>                presentations...
 
    What I saw was unremarkable.   
    		
    >acceptance speeches....
    
    What I saw was unremarkable.
    
    >		boring....same old, same old...
    
    Worse than boring.  Tedious is a better description.  I watched a
    pre-show on E! where Joan Rivers and her daughter were interviewing
    stars as they walked up the promenade.  Joan Rivers is as materialistic
    as one gets, I  think, and she kept asking everyone what they were
    wearing (i.e. what designer).  She was going on to each one about how
    marvelous they looked, etc.  I was so repulsed I got shivers up my
    spine.  It was funny when she asked Tim Allen's wife what she was
    wearing and by whom and the wife just looked at her for a few seconds
    and then said,"I don't know."  She was not amused by the shallowness, I 
    could tell.
    
    All in all, it seemed like the pinnacle of the culture of emptiness.  I
    had an odd feeling that I might have been in Rome watching courtiers
    make a show of the masses.
    
    jeff
366.5RDGE44::ALEUC8Tue Mar 28 1995 11:355
    .2
    
    it's a very good restaurant in the Seychelles
    
    ric
366.6SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIYap! Yap! Yap! Yap! Yap! Yap! Yap!Tue Mar 28 1995 11:364
    
    
    From the report in .4, I'm glad I didn't waste my time... Wouldn't have
    watched it for any reason...
366.7CSLALL::HENDERSONFriend will you be ready?Tue Mar 28 1995 11:565



 Was everybody wearing red ribbons?
366.8almost everyoneUSAT05::BENSONEternal WeltanschauungTue Mar 28 1995 11:571
    
366.9But of course!!SOLVIT::KRAWIECKITue Mar 28 1995 12:241
    
366.10CSOA1::LEECHGo Hogs!Tue Mar 28 1995 12:323
    Put me in the "who cares?" category.  
    
    -steve
366.11CSOA1::LEECHGo Hogs!Tue Mar 28 1995 12:345
    "Pinnacle of the culture of emptiness"...
    
    I like that, Jeff.  It pretty much sums this "event" up for me, too.
    
    -steve
366.12MPGS::MARKEYThe Completion Backwards PrincipleTue Mar 28 1995 12:366
    I caught about 10 minutes around midnight... they were doing their
    usual "People Who Died" retrospective for the year... so my question
    is... Where the hell was John Candy???? Talk about a horrible
    oversight!!
    
    -b
366.13SUBURB::COOKSHalf Man,Half BiscuitTue Mar 28 1995 12:468
    I saw a clip of the Oscars on tv this morning. What a horrible bunch
    of "luvvies" they all were.
    
    Especially that prat Tom Hanks. "oh darling. oh luvvie. With my wife,
    I learn a little more about love each day".
    
    Yeah,right. And he`ll be getting divorced in about 6 months no doubt.
    
366.14SWAM2::SMITH_MATue Mar 28 1995 12:5921
    
    
    
    
     
    Well, I live for the Oscars.  I haven't missed them in 17 years and I
    always have lots of fun watching them.  Last night was no exception. 
    Yes it was boring in places but I thought Dave did a great job.  I
    loved the stuff about the monkey screentest for Cabin Boy.  Most
    everyone looked great (Jodie Foster gets the Oscar for best dressed
    female, Deniro and Pacino tie for best male) and there was tons o'
    trash, trash, trash!!!!
    
    The problem is that people watch the Oscar presentation as if the show
    alone is supposed to be entertaining....it's not!  It's what you and a 
    group of friends can do in front of the television, yelling obscenities 
    and throwing pretzels and mocking everyone and timing acceptance speeches! 
    Aye, there's the rub!
    
    MJ
    
366.15CSOA1::LEECHGo Hogs!Tue Mar 28 1995 13:342
    I see your point.  As a group MST3000 kinda thing, it would have plenty
    of "fun" material.  That idea has possibilities, I'll admit.  8^)
366.16TROOA::COLLINSIons in the ether...Tue Mar 28 1995 13:444
    
    Well...I for one agreed with the two Oscars `Ed Wood' picked up
    (Best Supporting Actor {Martin Landau} and Best Makeup).
    
366.17MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Tue Mar 28 1995 13:494
Speaking of Martin Landau, who was the blonde he had hanging off his arm
last night? Certainly not Barbara Bain, who has no doubt aged better
than he.

366.18Am I missing something ?GAAS::BRAUCHERTue Mar 28 1995 13:506
    
    So am I the only one who hasn't seen Forrest Gump ?
    
    Should I ?
    
      bb
366.19Thought it might be his daughter?TROOA::COLLINSIons in the ether...Tue Mar 28 1995 13:515
    
    .17, Jack:
    
    THAT's what my fiancee said!   :^)
    
366.20And not in a great hurry to do soCSLALL::HENDERSONFriend will you be ready?Tue Mar 28 1995 13:5312

 RE .18



 No, I haven't seen it either.




 Jim
366.21CONSLT::MCBRIDEaspiring peasantTue Mar 28 1995 13:552
    nor me either.  Mah momma always told me to wait for the video tape as
    it will be cheaper to pop your own corn at home.  
366.22PENUTS::DDESMAISONSno, i'm aluminuming 'um, mumTue Mar 28 1995 13:554
  .18

 I haven't seen it either, but probably will.
366.23Haven't seen anything else this year, either, but StargateMOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Tue Mar 28 1995 13:562
I also have been remiss in seeing Gump.

366.24MKOTS3::JMARTINYou-Had-Forty-Years!!!Tue Mar 28 1995 13:591
    Haven't seen it either!
366.25CSOA1::LEECHGo Hogs!Tue Mar 28 1995 14:008
    Count me in, too...haven't seen it, probably won't.  Never really had
    the urge or curiosity to see it. 
    
    Maybe I'll give it a look when it comes out on video.  I'd rather spend
    $2 and pop my own corn, than spend $6.50 for the ticket and $8.00 for a
    small popcorn and coke.
    
    -steve
366.26HANNAH::MODICAJourneyman NoterTue Mar 28 1995 14:074
    
    Saw a little last night.
    All I know is one woman needn't be asked, when shopping,
    "cash or charge?"
366.27USAT05::BENSONEternal WeltanschauungTue Mar 28 1995 14:0713
    
    Gump is a refreshingly genuine film.  The characters are great and
    greatly portrayed in every case.  The story is funny, sweet, sad, 
    panoramic in its sweep of the past thirty years or so and terribly 
    current somehow.
    
    I would highly recommend the film.  Of course, the undue hype and
    politization might make some resist the idea of seeing it.  And then
    you might be disappointed.  But if you watch just to enjoy a story/film
    you won't be disappointed I promise.  Gump himself is an unforgettable
    character, one we'd all like to have in our lives.
    
    jeff
366.28SOLVIT::KRAWIECKITue Mar 28 1995 14:084
    
    
    I'll wait for the $1.25 rental....
    
366.29Bring back Whoopi as hostessDECLNE::REESEToreDown,I'mAlmostLevelW/theGroundTue Mar 28 1995 14:106
    Was channel surfing when Letterman did his Top Ten - excrutiatingly
    UNfunny.  Later surfed back just in time to catch his tasteless
    remark to Jamie Lee Curtis about the "touching" incident at a diff-
    erent aware show.
    
    
366.30CSLALL::HENDERSONFriend will you be ready?Tue Mar 28 1995 14:135


 I may see it on video as well.  I rarely get to a theatre these days..last
 time was to see "The Brady Bunch Movie" ;-)
366.31last year's showSWAM1::MEUSE_DATue Mar 28 1995 14:3411
    
    re. 12
    
    I think John Candy died March 3 or 4 of 1994, and his death
    was mentioned in the last awards show.
    
    Dave
    
    
    
    
366.32SWAM2::SMITH_MATue Mar 28 1995 14:395
    re .?
    
    The blonde hanging off of Mr. Landau is the second Mrs. Landau.
    
    MJ
366.33POBOX::BATTISContract StudmuffinTue Mar 28 1995 15:097
    
    I caught a bit of the Oscars last night, pretty boring actually. Did
    anyone notice that Sharon Stone looked an awful lot like Madonna???
    
    Maybe its just me, but I thought so.
    
    Mark
366.34NUBOAT::HEBERTCaptain BlighTue Mar 28 1995 15:237
I like Oscars. My friend had some about 8" long. She fed them goldfish.
The Oscars would kind of look at them, then BAM! No more goldfish, just
some gold scales flit-flitting down through the water.

HTH,

Art
366.35Letterman Rules !MKOTS3::FLATHERSTue Mar 28 1995 16:506
    
         David Letterman   made it  very interesting and funny.....
    
      man, some of you noters are so hard to please.......gaud !!!
    
    
366.36SWAM2::SMITH_MATue Mar 28 1995 17:437
    re. 26
    
    Can't remember her name, but the woman who didn't leave home without it
    won the best costume oscar for her work on The Adventures of Priscilla
    Queen of the Desert.
    
    MJ
366.37CSC32::J_OPPELTWhatever happened to ADDATA?Tue Mar 28 1995 18:1214
    	Funny, the concentration of people in here who don't make it to
    	the movies.
    
    	Maybe you're spending too much time here!
    
    	Gump is a must-see.  It'll be on video shortly.  Unlike something
    	like Jurassic Park or Dances With Wolves, it won't lose much being
    	seen on the small screen.
    
    	I only turned the show on for the last half hour or so.  I didn't
    	notice anyone wearing red ribbons, though for many of the women
    	the cameras weren't showing anything they were wearing, what with
    	all those quasi-topless dresses they were all wearing...  Where
    	were they pinning those red ribbons anyway?
366.38SWAM2::SMITH_MATue Mar 28 1995 18:496
    re .37
    
    I disagree.  I think Gump should be seen on the big screen.  All of
    that blue screen editing magic is amazing!
    
    MJ
366.39Entertaining, but not "BEST" (IMO)KAOFS::D_STREETTue Mar 28 1995 18:5321
    I found Gump to be a rose colored romp through recent American history.
    Not bad for what it was, but BEST PICTURE ? It was far too two
    dimensional to deserve the Oscar (IMO). No charactor development,
    little or no plot, held together with "feel good" scenes, special
    effects and "groaner" humour. Compare this to "Schindlers List" and you
    see what I mean by Gump being too "lightweight" for best picture. I
    think it won a popularity contest, not a serious judgement of what the
    "best picture" of the year was.
    
     As the pre-oscar show I heard on the radio said:
    
    "Life is not like a box of chocolates, unless you put glass in some"
    
     You would need to do this to reflect the times that life just plain
    sucks. Or to put it another way, not everything life offers tastes
    as sweet as a chocolate.
    
    							Derek.
    
    
    								Derek.
366.40SWAM2::SMITH_MATue Mar 28 1995 19:0425
    <----- I agree.  Of the five films nominated for best picture I would
    rather of seen Shawshank win (or even Pulp Fiction).  Gump was what it
    was but it wasn't best picture.  Neither, IMO, was Hanks the best
    actor.  Both Morgan Freeman and John Travolta did better jobs.
    
    Both Jessica Lange and Diane Weist deserved the win, but both Gary 
    Sinise (Gump) and Samuel L. Jackson (Pulp) were better supporting 
    actors then the sentimental winner, Landau.
    
    But the Oscars have never been about who is the most talented.  It's
    like <------ said.  It's a popularity contest or a sentimental
    obligation to vote for said nominees.
    
    Pulp Fiction would never have won best picture...Tarentino is way to
    much of a rebel and it's his first time out.  That scenario almost
    always wins best screenplay.  John Singleton and Boyz in the Hood was
    the exact same thing.  The academy feels (and in some ways, rightly so)
    that a nomination is as much as they shoud get their first time out.
    
    The only time that a first time director has won in recent years is
    Kevin Costner, and he was already a Hollywood Darling at the time he
    made Dances With Wolves.
    
    MJ
                            
366.41Gump Happens!RICKS::TOOHEYTue Mar 28 1995 20:018
    
    I thought Gump was easily the best picture of the year, Pulp Fiction
    an excellent movie, and the other three nominees just thrown in as
    fillers. Gump should definately be seen on the big screen.
    
    Paul
    
    
366.42ODIXIE::CIAROCHIOne Less DogWed Mar 29 1995 10:574
    I would not have picked Gump for anything.
    
    But then again, I didn't see it...
    
366.43BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeWed Mar 29 1995 11:0511

	I heard that a USA Today & Mello Yellow can made it into the Gump
movie. And unless he could travel back in time, they weren't in existance yet. 



SOURCE: Dateline


Glen
366.44re: flubsPERFOM::LICEA_KANEwhen it&#039;s comin&#039; from the leftWed Mar 29 1995 11:2821
   Movies for $1000 Art.
   
   And it's the Daily Double.  The category, Movies.  You currently have
   $12,600 dollars, what is your wager?
   
   I'll bet it all Art.
   
   [audience murmers]
   
   And the answer is:
   
   "Get A Life"
   
   "What do you say to someone who spends all their free time looking
   for flubs?"
   
   That's the correct question!  Well done.  Well done.
   
   [audience applauds]
   
   								-mr. bill
366.45MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Wed Mar 29 1995 11:333
Art?

I thought his name was Alex . . . 
366.46NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Wed Mar 29 1995 11:372
Could this be .... a flub?  When Art hosted Jeopardy, I think Double Jeopardy
only got up to $200 or so.
366.47OOTOOL::CHELSEAMostly harmless.Wed Mar 29 1995 15:419
    I taped the Oscars and watched 'em yesterday.  I can't say anything
    about the acceptance speeches 'cause I fast-forwarded through them. 
    Nor can I comment on the appropriateness of the awards, since I haven't
    seen most of the nominated work.  Dave was a little slow getting
    started, but he kept things moving.  I think they'll ask him back.  I
    skipped over the opening production number; it was all too muddled for
    me.  But I liked the "Circle of Life/Hakuna Matata" number.
    
    All in all, a fairly ordinary edition of the Oscars.
366.48SWAM2::SMITH_MAWed Mar 29 1995 16:1014
    >Dave was a little slow getting
    > started, but he kept things moving.  I think they'll ask him back.
    
    Rumor has it that Dave regreted taking this job before the ink was dry
    in the contract.  Even if asked back I don't think he'd go.  My bid is
    for Steve Martin next time around.  Not that I think Dave didn't do a
    good job...he did.  I just think he's above it.  His show is aces. 
    Stay there and keep up the fantastic work.
    
    As for the musical numbers at the Oscars I thought they were terrible! 
    It's just the same old Debbie Allen crud we've all seen a million times
    before.  They should try something new next year.
    
    MJ
366.49Love Oscar, but *not* Dave!SWAM2::GOLDMAN_MAWalking Incubator, Use CautionWed Mar 29 1995 18:0018
    I love the Oscars, watch 'em every year, along with the country music
    awards show(s).  If I happen to available to watch Emmy night, I do,
    but don't make a point to do so.
    
    I just plain don't like Letterman, never have, probably never will.  I
    did like the "Cabin Boy" auditions, but otherwise didn't enjoy much of
    his hosting time.  Thought Whoopi was much better, but *nobody* does it
    better than Billy Crystal.  However, nobody really wants to do this more
    than once, so I doubt we'll see Letterman back again next year.
    
    IMHO - Thought the Russian man who won Best Foreign Film had the most
    "touching" speech. The "most deserved" award of the evening was 
    definitely Clint Eastwood's Irving Thalberg Award for his body of
    work.  "Most Predictable" were Dianne Wiest's Best Supporting, and Lion
    King's Best Score and Best Song.
    
    M.
    
366.50SX4GTO::WANNOORWed Mar 29 1995 21:262
    The inside track is that Nigel Hawthorne should have won 'best actor'
    but he was just too good for the Oscars.
366.51PEKING::SULLIVANDNot gauche, just sinisterThu Mar 30 1995 05:003
    Rumour hath it that "The Madness of King George" should have won but
    not enough people have seen it...
    
366.52Umma...Oprah (What A Crock)LUDWIG::BARBIERIThu Mar 30 1995 12:278
      My wife watched it and I caught the 1st half hour with her.
    
      I thought Letterman's chronic "Umma...Oprah..." whatever's
      were absolutely pathetic.  It wasn't funny the 1st time and
      it wasn't funny the 10th.
    
      The only film I saw was Shawshank Redemption which I liked
      very much and I hoped Morgan Freeman would win.
366.53PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Mar 30 1995 17:384
    re .35: I'm a huge Letterman fan (have met him) and I thought he was
    awful.
    
    Mark.
366.54WAHOO::LEVESQUEluxure et suppliceFri Mar 31 1995 08:154
     Letterman is fine being the Don Rickles of late night TV. That's his
    comfort zone- getting people on his show and insulting them. And doing
    weird and random things that amuse drunk and stoned college students.
    Take him away from that and he's nothing special.
366.55better not confuse anybody...KIRKTN::GMCKEEFri Mar 31 1995 17:268
    
    RE- The Madness Of King George...
    
    The film was to be titled "The Madness of King George III" but the
    makers dropped the III incase the yanks started asking about the
    first two movies.
    
    G.
366.56CONSLT::MCBRIDEaspiring peasantFri Mar 31 1995 17:271
    <----- Bwahahahaah!  
366.57DASHER::RALSTONAin&#039;t Life Fun!Fri Mar 31 1995 19:543
    re .55
    
    G.---- that was funny, I liked it !!!!
366.58JULIET::MORALES_NASweet Spirit&#039;s Gentle BreezeFri Mar 31 1995 20:172
    Oscar SNARF!
    
366.59Bring back Whoopi; Letterman was the pitsDECLNE::REESEToreDown,I&#039;mAlmostLevelW/theGroundMon Apr 03 1995 10:384
    Madness of King George should have won.  Nigel Hawthorne was superb,
    and Helen Mirren, well there are few actresses in her class.
    
    
366.60Here's an Oscar for you.KIRKTN::DALEXANDERCentuwian...stwike him woughly!Tue Apr 04 1995 07:472
    My Aunt Agnes had a cat called Oscar once.
    
366.61And another.KIRKTN::DALEXANDERCentuwian...stwike him woughly!Tue Apr 04 1995 07:494
    Just thought of another Oscar
    
    
     Oscar Wilde.     8-)))))0
366.62Bored.KIRKTN::DALEXANDERCentuwian...stwike him woughly!Tue Apr 04 1995 07:506
    Keiff just told me his local pub is called
    
    
    OSCARS.....wow who would have thought it.
    
    
366.63What a lota...KIRKTN::DALEXANDERCentuwian...stwike him woughly!Tue Apr 04 1995 07:548
    
    Oscars is actually an anogram of Scarlet O'hara 
    
    
    
    If you take some letters away and jumble the rest of them about
    abit(and add another s).....8*) ...
     
366.64"Oscar no more"BHAJI::CMTTue Apr 04 1995 11:112
    Actually I was at the Oscars last year and it was the biggest load of
    CATS PISS I have ever witnessed.So bollocks to the lot of you.....
366.65BIGQ::SILVADiabloTue Apr 04 1995 11:263

	How often do you witness cats pissing?
366.66POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesTue Apr 04 1995 11:303
    
    Pamina hurries over to tinkie while I'm scooping the cat box.  I think she
    likes the company.                                        
366.67POLAR::RICHARDSONFan Club BaloneyTue Apr 04 1995 11:361
    I would like the company too!
366.68BIGQ::SILVADiabloTue Apr 04 1995 11:361
<----- oh my God!!!!  
366.69POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesTue Apr 04 1995 11:402
    
    Potty is a private thing for me 8^).
366.70WMOIS::GIROUARD_CTue Apr 04 1995 12:573
    .64 who are you!
    
    Chip
366.71My identity will die with me.BHAJI::CMTTue Apr 04 1995 13:468
    Re.70
    
    I am the phantom noter.I can strike anywhere at anytime.I am all
    knowing and all powerful.LOOK OUT THE PHANTOMS ABOUT.
    
    The Phantom.
    
    
366.72RDGE44::ALEUC8Tue Apr 04 1995 13:484
    i thought of lots of words to describe you but phantom wasn't one of
    them
    
    ric
366.73MKOTS3::JMARTINYou-Had-Forty-Years!!!Tue Apr 04 1995 13:5410
    Oh great...another Mailroom!
    
    Look Mr...I don't know from under which rock you crawled.  But I have
    been noting here a bit longer than you have.  I know what you are in
    for.
    
    So my advice to you would be....go back and crawl under your little
    rock from whence you came...before you get squashed!
    
    Rgds.
366.74GRANPA::MWANNEMACHERNRA member in good standingTue Apr 04 1995 13:556
    
    
    Zatyu Jamie?
    
    
    
366.75His name should be tiny tears.MASALA::DALEXANDERCentuwian...stwike him woughly!Tue Apr 04 1995 14:051
    What about that Tom Hanks eh? is he a big girls blouse or what?
366.76<PHANTOM'S>WMOIS::GIROUARD_CTue Apr 04 1995 15:081
    
366.77 Pulp Fiction was the worst movie ever!!!TAMARA::KMAC::morarosTue Apr 04 1995 15:3213
I didn't think Dave did a good job at the Oscars.

Pulp Fiction was the worst movie I have ever seen!  I almost walked out.  
John Travolta did nothing in that movie and didn't even deserve the 
nomination.  What a terrible movie.  I went with my father and he said the 
worst movie he ever saw was Natural Born Killers, (he walked out, and so did 
4 other people in the theatre!) and he said Pulp Fiction was the second 
worst movie he ever saw.  I didnt see Natural Born Killers so I can't say 
but I can say that Pulp Fiction was real bad!!!!!!!

My opinion, of course.

-Kim
366.78CSOA1::LEECHGo Hogs!Tue Apr 04 1995 15:531
    Who's Oscar?
366.79BIGQ::SILVADiabloTue Apr 04 1995 15:563

	Oscar Madison. He is a slob
366.80GAVEL::JANDROWTue Apr 04 1995 16:029
    
    
    and he will be played by our very own mz_deb in may!!!!
    
    
    :> :> :>
    
    
    
366.81POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesTue Apr 04 1995 16:042
    
    Typecasting, I tell you, typecasting 8^).
366.82NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Tue Apr 04 1995 16:243
>    and he will be played by our very own mz_deb in may!!!!
    
In drag?    
366.83POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesTue Apr 04 1995 16:252
    
    _The Odd Couple (transvestite version)_
366.84POLAR::RICHARDSONFan Club BaloneyTue Apr 04 1995 17:161
    Is there a hermaphrodite version per chance?
366.85NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Tue Apr 04 1995 17:181
Or a multiple personality version?
366.86POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesTue Apr 04 1995 17:182
    
    That could be a one-person show then 8^)))))))))))))))))))))))).
366.87I wish I were anDECLNE::REESEToreDown,I&#039;mAlmostLevelW/theGroundTue Apr 04 1995 19:142
    Then there's always the Oscar Meyer weiner......
    
366.88Talk HardSNOFS1::DAVISMAnd monkeys might fly outa my butt!Tue Apr 04 1995 19:531
    Oscar was the little baby in Ghostbusters II.... I fink?
366.89OOTOOL::CHELSEAMostly harmless.Tue Apr 04 1995 20:401
    What a rude thing to do to a helpless child.
366.90GIDDAY::BURTLet us reason togetherTue Apr 04 1995 20:546
I believe Barry Humphries (Dame Edna) also named his child Oscar. 

Yes, the child _was_ a boy.


Chele
366.91CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenWed Apr 05 1995 14:451
    Oscar, Veal Oscar, at your service.  
366.92MPGS::MARKEYThe bottom end of Liquid SanctuaryWed Apr 05 1995 14:581
    Oscar Peterson.
366.93NETCAD::WOODFORDTimeToFillTheDonuts!Wed Apr 05 1995 15:029
    
    
    I think shall nominate my performance today for an Oscar. :*)
    
    
    
    
    Terrie
    
366.948^)POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesWed Apr 05 1995 15:415
    
    I wish I were an Oscar Mayer wiener
    That is what I'd truly like to beeeeeee
    Cuz if I were an Oscar Mayer wiener
    Everyone would take a bite of me.
366.95GAVEL::JANDROWWed Apr 05 1995 15:424
    
    oscar de la renta
    
    
366.96SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIYap!Yap!Yap!Yap!Yap!Yap!Yap!Wed Apr 05 1995 15:495
    
    RE: .94
    
    Your own version???
    
366.97MKOTS3::JMARTINYou-Had-Forty-Years!!!Wed Apr 05 1995 15:517
    Ya know, I've been noticing that Mz. Debra has been writing alot of
    inuendos lately...things that make you go Hmmmmmm...or
    MMMMmmmmmmmm...sepending on how strong your labido is that day.
    
    Hot dates...little chambers and all that....what gives??!
    
    -Meaty
366.98Oscar Wah WahTROOA::TRP109::Chrisperform random acts of affectionWed Apr 05 1995 16:031
Oscar Wee Wee
366.99BIGQ::SILVADiabloWed Apr 05 1995 16:043

	Jack, that was a CLASSIC!!!!! 
366.100BIGQ::SILVADiabloWed Apr 05 1995 16:044


	Oscar Meier Snarf!!!!
366.101What Arnie said to Maria on their 1st dateTROOA::TRP109::Chrisperform random acts of affectionWed Apr 05 1995 16:075
I was in L.A. the night the Oscars were on and you ain't seen hype until 
you live through it in Hollyweird.  Pretty dull show IMHO, however I did 
laugh at one of Letterman's jokes....

	"Eat, Drink, Man, Woman"
366.102POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesWed Apr 05 1995 16:0815
    
    .96
    
    Yes, my own version, Andy...after all, I figger everyone is ALREADY in 
    love with me, so I don't need to wish for that 8^).
    
    {snort} BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
    
    {ahem} sorry 8^).
    
    .97
    
    Meaty - labido?  That sounds kinky 8^).
    
    ...oh dear, there I go again 8^o!
366.103POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of Fuzzy FacesWed Apr 05 1995 16:0911
    
    .98
    
    No no Chris...that's:
    
    Osky wa wa
    Wisky wee wee
    Holy mucky-eye
    Soak 'em Varsity!
    
    8^)
366.104BIGQ::SILVADiabloWed Apr 05 1995 16:1311


	Speaking of Oscars, Chris Farley should win one for what he did
yesterday. He went into congress dressed as eye of newt. he was saying a lot of
funny things, and tried to pass a new contract with america. at the end of it,
he said, "Well, I'm hungry. Racheal, go get me a school lunch!"  I couldn't
stop laughing. :-)


Glen
366.105WAHOO::LEVESQUEluxure et suppliceWed Apr 05 1995 16:251
    Neither could Newt, reportedly.
366.106BIGQ::SILVADiabloWed Apr 05 1995 16:374

	They showed him too. Yes, he was not just laughing, but clapping as
well. 
366.107For qualified scientists onlyDECWIN::RALTOThe Nasal Voice and Image of DigitalThu Apr 06 1995 17:583
    State-of-the-art, experimental sex should be performed in the labido.
    
    Chris
366.108Herpes Simplex G (or whatever!!)STRATA::BARBIERIFri Apr 07 1995 13:575
      re: .73
    
      Beverly Hills Cop.  I caught it!!
    
      						Oscar Meier
366.109MKOTS3::JMARTINI press on toward the goalThu Nov 16 1995 15:271
    I think Suzanne should keep it to one topic!!!
366.110BUSY::SLABOUNTYCrackerThu Nov 16 1995 15:383
    
    	OK, I give up ... was that put here for a reason?
    
366.111CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenThu Nov 16 1995 15:562
    Don't be silly Shawn, of course it was.  Exactly why, we will most
    likely never know but I guarantee there is a reason.
366.112SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIif u cn rd ths, u nd to gt a lyfThu Nov 16 1995 16:026
    
    
    Come on guys!!! I admit it was, maybe too subtle... but it's there...
    
    :)