T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
36.1 | | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Thu Jan 03 1991 11:04 | 7 |
|
I think the Broncos should concentrate on getting some
defensive help come draft day. They need two DL, one or
two LBs, and two legitimate cornerbacks with speed (does
the Rocket wanna play corner in the pros?).
Claybroon
|
36.2 | My .02 | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jan 03 1991 13:09 | 19 |
| re-1 Ditto except on the LBs. I think they are only week there in the
way they are used. Wymon Henderson should be benched/waived as well as
Holmes on the line. If denver could get a big agressive DLinemen, then
you could look for the defense to be very good.
I feel 1 reason there passing defense lacks is do to the pressure
that doesn't exsist. This is why teams have had such great succsess
throwing the ball against denver, 'cause when you have all day to throw
the ball, eventually someone will be open.
Denver still has a good ruch defense IMO.
The offense is there if better plays are inserted. REeves should do
some "benchmarking" from other teams playbooks.
Denver also better start looking for a QB in the next few drafts,
'cause Elway won't last forever. He just finished year #8.
T-bone (thanks Claybroon)
|
36.3 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Jan 03 1991 21:34 | 9 |
| A major attitude adjustment is in order for this team. If Holmes
tries anything cute like holding out again......he should be gone.
If Kay or any other 2nd, 3rd or 4th time offender picks up so much
as a jay walking ticket.....they're outta there. Henderson is just
plain outta there. QB selection should be considered in later rounds.
Winder leaving opens a slot for another rb. But I agree with earlier
notes. Emphasis will be on defensive players both line and secondary.
BoB
|
36.4 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Mon Jan 07 1991 18:28 | 26 |
| Denver will flip with the Rams tomorrow to decide who gets the 4th pick
in the draft. I wouldn't say Holmes is necessarily gone. That holdout
set him way back, and with a full camp he could return to his form of
1989. Cornerback is definitely a need, but I agree that the biggest
problems are on the line. The defensive problems aren't quite as bad
as they've been made out to be, because Carreker and Braxton went down
early in the season with injuries, and the move of Mecklenberg to the
outside turned out to be a disaster. But there's still more needs on
the defensive side of the ball.
The offensive line is a big problem area, especially when it comes to
depth. Backups at running back are the only other real need on
offense. I don't think it's necessary to look for a replacement to
Elway yet.
I'd love to see the Broncos get Russell Maryland, but I don't even know
if he'll last until the 4th pick. Mel Kiper recently said the top 2
players in the draft will be Rocket and Maryland.
Top 3 areas of need for Denver IMO:
1. Defensive Line
2. Offensive Line
3. Cornerback
Joe
|
36.5 | Who won the toss (as if it matters). | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Jan 08 1991 16:18 | 3 |
| Excuse my ignorance, but who is Russell Maryland?
Tim
|
36.6 | he'd definitely help the Bronco defense | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Do the Bartman! | Tue Jan 08 1991 16:22 | 7 |
| re .5:
Russell Maryland is a defensive tackle from the University of Miami who
is projected as one of the first few overall picks in the draft.
py
|
36.8 | more info... | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jan 10 1991 18:48 | 3 |
| How big is he? And how fast, plus any college stats would be nice?..
T-bone
|
36.9 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Jan 10 1991 22:28 | 4 |
| Anybody hear who won the coin flip between Rams and Broncos?
BoB
P.S. Only 5 more shopping days before WW III.
|
36.10 | Bob, the Donks won it.... | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Fri Jan 11 1991 10:13 | 1 |
|
|
36.11 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Fri Jan 11 1991 10:28 | 4 |
| Maryland is 6-2, 272, and has ordinary speed, but is a very intense and
aggressive player.
Joe
|
36.12 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Jan 11 1991 15:05 | 5 |
| I vote for Lyght or Williams
dancing Dorks need not apply.
Mike JN (SIDJNOTY)
|
36.13 | Todd Lyght in Orange?...Sounds good. | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:48 | 11 |
| Although it's very early, it seems like Toddy Lyght would be an
excellent pick, assuming he's available at 4th and Maryland is already
gone. I was thumbing through a report by Joel Bishbaum the other day,
and he said that Lyght is the 7th best cornerback prospect coming out
since 1969. That's pretty damm impressive! Of course, that's only one
man's view. It'll be very interesting to see what the other 'experts'
have to say about him as the draft nears. I've heard his weaknesses
are his speed (although it's considered to be above average), and his
tackling.
Joe
|
36.14 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:57 | 9 |
| !?!?!?!??!!?!??!?
If speed and tackling are weaknesses
What the hail is he supposed to be doing at Cornerback for the Donks!?!?
Selling souvenier Officer Perry badges!?!?!
!?!?!?!?!?
Mike JN
|
36.15 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:30 | 7 |
| His speed is good, they're just saying it's not world-class. It's one
of the few 'weaknesses' they could point out in this guy, if you want
to call it that. As far as his tackling, it's something he can work on.
If Lyght's cover skills are as good as reported, he's definitely worth
a high pick. Good cover guys come few and far between.
Joe
|
36.16 | Sounds like a great pick.. | SALEM::DODA | Worthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, Ho | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:38 | 10 |
| From my draft report:
Todd Lyght: 6-1 181 speed: 4.3
May be the finest athlete in the'91 draft; has
blazing speed, lightning quickness, very happy feet and great
instincts. Will shut down an opponents best receiver 1-1, gives
almost no cushion, is technically sound, plays smart. He hit
hard, is a very sure, crisp tackler in the openfield, plays run
well. May be 1st pick.
|
36.17 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Get out your maps & erasers, class | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:00 | 7 |
|
Draft Lyte!
Some say he's less thrilling. I say he plays great!
Dickstah
|
36.18 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:27 | 3 |
| No flies on Dickstah
Mike JN
|
36.19 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:41 | 3 |
| RE .16
Whose scouting report was this? Certainly is an impressive one.
|
36.20 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Air Force, CSU, CU... Denver Bronco's | Tue Jan 15 1991 10:22 | 8 |
| Todd Lyght is the pick in the Draft.
Advantage is he can walk on the field and play from day 1.
Alfred Williams is about 15lbs under weight.
The Miami Hurricanes "danc'n fool" isn't a Bronco type player.
Jeff
|
36.21 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: 1990 Big 8 & National Champions | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:17 | 12 |
| I'm not really that excited about Alfred Williams, at least not as a
top 10 pick. Most scouts are projecting him at defensive end, but I
think he's best suited as an outside 'backer. One of his strengths is
being able to drop back into coverage, and you'd be taking that away if
you moved him to the line. If someone did want to move him to the
line, I think he would need to put on about 30 pounds, and he's had
a hard time trying to put on weight.
IMO, not worth the 4th pick in the draft.
Joe
|
36.22 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:10 | 12 |
| re-1 Alfred on the d-line? He only weighs 235 lbs. Another 10lbs
and he would be great for LB.
The donks need someone who can get to the QB. Maybe they should hire
Peters who the Vikes let go. He luvs the pass rush defense, and thats
exactly what denver needs. Obviously Denver isn't going to get enough
lineman to make a big impact, so if they have a guy that can teach them
the method of getting to the QB, then they can make best of what they
have. SEem logical??
T-bone
|
36.23 | I'd pick McGhee over Williams | COMET::WADE | Buffs ROOL! | Tue Jan 15 1991 13:42 | 7 |
|
T-bone,
I thought exactly the same thing when I read that Peters had
been fired. Cut loose Phillips and snatch up Peters!
Claybroon
|
36.24 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:18 | 10 |
| New England picked up Joe Collier as Defensive Co-ordinator.
They could have done worse... Collier was always considered one of the
best.
With him as D- Co-ordinator, the Donks never lost to the 49ers. In
fact, the Broncos are the only team `the genius' bill Walsh failed to
beat... EVER... either in preseason or regular season.
Mike JN
|
36.25 | Nice while it lasted ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Bippity Boppity Boo | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:23 | 10 |
| � With him as D- Co-ordinator, the Donks never lost to the 49ers. In
� fact, the Broncos are the only team `the genius' bill Walsh failed to
� beat... EVER... either in preseason or regular season.
And then came "post season" ...
Well, I think George Seifert kinda put an end to *THAT* streak,
dont'cha think ???
Bob Hunt
|
36.26 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:31 | 12 |
| � Well, I think George Seifert kinda put an end to *THAT* streak,
� dont'cha think ???
No way, Bobert!
Walsh STILL hasn't beaten the Donks
and Collier STILL hasn't been beaten by the 49ers ( Wade Phillips was
the Defensive Coordinator when the Broncos bit the big one last year ).
Mike JN
(I have to admit, though, I think the 49ers would have trashed the Donks
even if god was the Defensive Co-ordinator)
|
36.27 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Lush | Thu Jan 17 1991 16:04 | 3 |
| Yo Mike, your argument is kinda like an Iraqi bragging that the bomb
that blew up his installation was dropped by a British Tornado and not
an F-15E.
|
36.28 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Wed Jan 30 1991 18:42 | 7 |
| Dallas and at least 6 other teams are supposedly interested in
acquiring Gerald Perry from the Broncos.
The Broncos have stated that they will protect Ron Holmes and Dennis
Smith under plan-B.
Joe
|
36.29 | here's to Hoot and Monty!! | CHIEFF::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Thu Jan 31 1991 10:33 | 7 |
|
I would think more teams that that would be interested in learning the
"Denver Death Grip"(tm)....After all Gerald is the master of the hold...
;^)
mike
|
36.30 | Plan B | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Feb 12 1991 18:58 | 37 |
| This is a bit late, but here is the players the Broncos left
unprotected in plan B:
Scott Beavers G
Kevin Clark DB/KR
Kip Corrington S
Scott Curtis LB
Rick Dennison LB
Blake Ezor RB
David Galloway DE
Paul Green TE
Mike Horan P
Tim Lucas LB
Marc Munford LB
Kerry Porter RB
Elliott Smith CB
Monte Smith G
Tim Stallworth WR
Anthony Thompson LB
Andre Townsend DE
David Treadwell K
Chris Verhulst TE
Sammy Winder RB
The losses that would hurt most, if they are indeed signed by another
team, are Clark, Horan, Munford, and Paul Green. Clark made a definite
improvement in the return game late in the season. Horan continues to
be one of the league's punters, but I'm not too worried about Denver
losing him in plan B. Munford has been a solid backup ILB, and has
started on a number of occasions, and I think Green showed some
potential to be a good pass-catching tight end. Now that Mobley is
history, Green has a very good shot to make the team next season.
Verhulst was highly sought after in last year's plan B, but the Broncos
didn't use him much this past season. The Broncos are reported to be
mildly interested in Mark Bavaro.
Joe
|
36.31 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Feb 13 1991 11:07 | 6 |
|
BEAVERS UNPROTECTED!?!?!
Where's my sword and trusty steed?!
Mike JN
|
36.32 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:18 | 7 |
|
ESPN reported lasted night that the Broncos hired Ernie Stautner
(former Cowboys asst. coach) to be their defensive coordinator.
What happened to Wade Phillips?
Claybroon
|
36.33 | | COOKIE::WAHL | | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:21 | 4 |
| Stautner is the new defensive line coach. I think Bum Jr. is still the
defensive boss. For now.
Dave W.
|
36.34 | they'll never loin1 | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Feb 20 1991 12:32 | 2 |
| ...and the Donks continue to be the 'home for retired Cowboys'.
Denny
|
36.35 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Mar 11 1991 16:06 | 8 |
| Just catchin' up here, but I think the Broncos ought to get the
Cowboy cheerleaders if they want to make this a Dallas org. Actually,
they should bring back the Pony Express from years ago.
I don't even think that they have high school chearleaders at donk
games anymore.....
T-bone
|
36.36 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Greenpiece,WhatALeprichaunGets | Tue Mar 12 1991 11:42 | 1 |
| Yeh but who cheers for the Pumpkins(tm)?
|
36.37 | Linus!!! | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Tue Mar 12 1991 14:53 | 1 |
|
|
36.38 | He's baaaaaack | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Wed Mar 13 1991 10:47 | 7 |
|
Well folks, it seems that Gerald Perry (aka The Master of the
Denver Death Grip(tm)) has decided he would like to still play
in Denver. He apologized to his teammates and to the fans and
wants to start anew.
Claybroon
|
36.39 | So whens the draft..as if it matters | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Mar 13 1991 19:06 | 7 |
| gee, this makes my day.....
I wonder if he will even stay outta trouble long enough to get to
training camp....thats if he doesn't hold out;^
Linus??? Thats a good one!!!!!
|
36.40 | Draft is April 21st... | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Mar 13 1991 19:42 | 3 |
| Everyone deserves a 2nd chance, but Perry's had 3 or 4. With all the
off-the-field problems Denver's had with its players the last few
years, the last thing they should do now is bring back Perry.
|
36.41 | Trade him | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Thu Mar 14 1991 10:36 | 8 |
|
I agree but who knows what Reeves is thinking. He never said
"Good riddance!" when Perry announced his retirement. Danny
made a point of not giving up on him. Of course, it's hard to
make the team from a jail cell. He's still got two (at least
one) court cases pending against him.
Claybroon
|
36.42 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Mar 20 1991 17:38 | 8 |
| The Broncos are expected to make their first plan B signing today,
left cornerback Charles Dimry of the Atlanta Falcons. He is 6', 180
pounds and ran a 4.4 40 in a private workout for the Broncos. He has
been a starter for the Falcons for the past 2 seasons. I guess the
Broncos aren't sure how well Braxton will come back, even though he was
expected to be fully recovered for next season.
Joe
|
36.43 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 20 1991 17:53 | 7 |
| Charles Dimry joined the Falcons' very weak secondary last year.
He did start most of the time, which accounts for the fact that he
was burned so many times. The guy was awful last year. This from
an Atlanta resident who has been waiting for a resurgance from the
Falcons.
This is not a steal. The Broncos can have him.
|
36.44 | Dimry ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Wed Mar 20 1991 21:30 | 4 |
| Didn't Joe Montana and Jerry Rice have a monster day against Dimry ???
I know Randall Cunningham and the Eagles' wideouts carved him up.
Bob Hunt
|
36.45 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | In memorium : Al Cote ... | Thu Mar 21 1991 09:25 | 24 |
| Most of Rice's 5 TD's came against him .... but don't be too hard on
Dimry yet. Rememeber, we're talking about Jerry Glanville here. He
demands a lot of one on one coverage, and that's a formula for disaster
for almost any CB.
Example : Why the hell wasn't Sanders covering Rice last year ? The
best against the best, right ? Instead, the poor kid gets man to man,
with no help, against the guy who may well be the best WR in NFL
history. Ha.
Example 2 : Glanville BURIED Richard Johnson on the Oilers last year
in favor of his favorites Steve Brown, Patrick Allen and Jeff Donaldson.
The Oilers got killed in 2-minute situations. If it wasn't fo the front
office, Johnson would have been waived. Supposedly, Johnson didn't play
Glanville's style of man to man.
Pardee comes in, gives Rich a fair chance. He wins a starting job, and
ties for the AFC lead in interceptions (first timean Oiler did that in
10 years, and the 1st Oiler corner ever).
So give Dimry a chance - leaving Atlanta may be the best thing that
ever happened to him.
Doc
|
36.46 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Mar 29 1991 10:03 | 17 |
| The Broncos have now officially signed 2 plan B free agents, CB Charles
Dimry from Atlanta as expected, and guard Crawford Ker from Dallas.
Ker is expected to compete for a spot at left guard, and Juriga will
move to left if Perry doesn't come back. (And hopefully, he won't!)
The Broncos, like most other teams, took a much different approach to
plan B this year and only signed guys who they felt would seriously
challenge for a roster spot, instead of signing a bunch of free agents,
only to have half of 'em get cut before the end of training camp.
Horan turned down offers from Washington and SF and will stay with the
Broncos. He supposedly had a chance to become the highest paid punter
in NFL history.
On the draft front, the Broncos are reportedly leaning toward Nebraska
LB Mike Croel.
Joe
|
36.47 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Mar 29 1991 17:30 | 11 |
| >>The Broncos, like most other teams, took a much different approach
>>to plan B this year and only signed guys who thet felt would
>>seriously challenge for a roster spot, instead of signing a bunch
>>of free agents, only to have half of 'em get cut before the end
>>of training camp.
Gee, and to think it only took the Donks two years to figure out
what Uncle Al's known all along. Who ever said donkeys were dumb
animals anyhow? :-)
Carlos
|
36.48 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Apr 01 1991 17:37 | 3 |
| I see Carlos is back;^
T-bone
|
36.49 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Mon Apr 01 1991 19:09 | 5 |
|
Yeah T-Bone, and it only took him 3 months to recover from
the drubbing the Bills put on his Faiders(tm). 8-)
Claybroon
|
36.50 | | COMET::WADE | I won't....back....down. | Wed Apr 03 1991 14:36 | 5 |
|
Clarence Kay was arrested for DUI. I think this will be
strike 3 for him.......
Claybroon
|
36.51 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Apr 04 1991 14:12 | 11 |
| Re. .48 & .49
And to think all this time I thought you guys didn't care, why, ol
Claybroon was even counting the months .... how touching.
Re. .50
I think Kay averted the lifetime suspension because his b.a.l. was
only .093, just below the intoxication limit of .1 percent.
Carlos
|
36.52 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Apr 04 1991 17:04 | 5 |
| Kay is a good back up anymore. He cost the Broncs 2 games last year
with dropped passes in the endzone. I don't think he will be as big of
a loss as Reeves leads onto, same goes for Perry......
Tim
|
36.53 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'm doin' fine-e-e-e-e on cloud 9 | Fri Apr 05 1991 12:44 | 5 |
|
Ah Danny just stockpiling excuse for another 5-11 season...next we'll be
hearing about Johnny's hangnails...
mike
|
36.54 | Biff get manicures probably. | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Apr 08 1991 18:02 | 6 |
| re-1 Time will tell on the record. The Broncos will either flop or
go to the big one just like always.
You just better hope your Stellers stay out of the cellers.....
Tim
|
36.55 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Apr 15 1991 12:54 | 14 |
| The latest news out of Denver is the Broncos won't draft Nick Bell or
Todd Lyght. The coaching staff doesn't consider Lyght much better than
a handful of other corners available, and they probably won't pick a
corner until at least until the 3rd round.
Most likely scenario remains that they will take Croel with the 4th
pick. If Croel is gone, the word is they may take Alfred Williams.
Another likely scenario is they would trade down with Dallas and get 2
of their 1st-round picks, and probably take Eric Swann and a wide
receiver. The Broncos would probably give up their 4th pick and a
later-round pick or their 4th pick and Perry for Dallas' 2 1st round
picks.
Joe
|
36.56 | Give 'em Kay toooo | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Apr 15 1991 17:01 | 9 |
| Give up on Perry. Dallas is another team with controversy, and ole
Gerald (I never touched her) would fit right in.
I hope the Broncos go defense all the way this year. Only need 1
offensive player for sure, and thats a good backup to Humphrey.
The o-line should be ok for this year as long as they stay healthy.
T-bone
|
36.57 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Mon Apr 15 1991 18:54 | 4 |
| Can't believe you're saying this stuff Tim. The o-line and d-line seem
to be the real needs for the Broncos IMHO.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.58 | and QB... | MAXWEL::CHILDS | my hero, Brian Boitano on blades | Tue Apr 16 1991 10:36 | 0 |
36.59 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Tue Apr 16 1991 12:57 | 14 |
| I'd definitely like to see the Donks peddle Officer Perry. I keep
hearing talk about Perry and the #4 to Dallas for the 12 and 13 pick.
This would be a super deal.
I'd also like to see Denver bring back Kelly at Tight End and dump
Clarence Kay. Also, see them alternate starts between Shannon Sharpe
and Mike (mumble), and get rid of one or more of the three dwarf amigos
and pick up a good corner instead.
I also had a picture sent to me of a shrine to John Elway located in
MikeC's bedroom, right next to the Larry Bird shrine. I think that
shows a lotta class on Child's part.
Mike JN
|
36.60 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | I need some sensible shoes | Tue Apr 16 1991 14:48 | 5 |
| Denver will deal the #4 pick to anybody for a combination pair of later
1st rounders. They will pick Herman Moore, or Mike Pritchard for WR help.
late 3rd will pick George Hemmingway. The draft is deep in wr and denver
could easily deal Vance "can't dance" Johnson or Mark Jackson and the #4
for Eric Swann and a wr.
|
36.61 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Apr 18 1991 15:34 | 10 |
| Gary Kubiak will undergo surgery Friday morning to repair a ruptured
disc in his lower back. He suffered the injury a couple of weeks ago in
weight training. His future in football dependson the extent of the
damage and the success of his recovery. Denver may have to start the
season without Kubiak, because they are talking at least 3 months but
by the time he gets his strength back it could be into the season.
This could definitely change Denver's early-round draft plans.
Joe
|
36.62 | RAiders are in deep @$@#$%^ this year | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Apr 18 1991 18:07 | 4 |
| Thats to bad about Kubiak, so now it looks as though they need a QB
as well.
Tim
|
36.63 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Apr 18 1991 19:19 | 9 |
| Re-Glenn, I think the O-line will be ok if they are healthy. I
also said they need defense allllll they way. Safety is there only
real strong points on defense right now IMO, with the exception of Meck
at the inside.
I think Pritchard would be a steal if he is still around when Denver
has there opprotunities in later rounds.
Tim
|
36.64 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Thu Apr 18 1991 19:44 | 3 |
| You're right Tim, Pritchart is really underated IMHO.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.65 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Apr 18 1991 20:09 | 4 |
| I'll be very surprised if Pritchard doesn't get picked in the first
round.
Joe
|
36.66 | I use it to seperate wommin from girls. wommin want Larry | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Yesterday, well it seemed so cool... | Fri Apr 19 1991 10:23 | 6 |
|
Tim, actually 2 QBs'....
JN, good one the other day I still owe on that one...
;^)
|
36.67 | 1991 Bronco Schedule | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Apr 19 1991 11:07 | 21 |
| Sept. 1 CINCINNATI 2pm
Sept. 8 at LA Faiders 2pm
Sept. 15 SEATTLE 2pm
Sept. 22 SAN DIEGO 2pm
Sept. 29 at Minnesota 6pm
Oct. 6 at Houston 11am
Oct. 13 Bye
Oct. 20 KANSAS CITY 2pm
Oct. 27 at New Engand 11am
Nov. 3 PITTSBURGH 6pm
Nov. 10 LA FAIDERS 2pm
Nov. 17 at Kansas City 11am
Nov. 24 at Seattle 2pm
Dec. 1 NEW ENGLAND 2pm
Dec. 8 at Cleveland 11am
Dec. 15 PHOENIX 2pm
Dec. 22 at San Diego 2pm
All times are Mountain
|
36.68 | Looks like they'll be at the bottom again. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Apr 19 1991 12:24 | 4 |
| Their first win won't come until Oct. 27th and they'll be lucky
to win that one, hee hee heeeee.....:-) God, I love Donk bashing!
Carlos
|
36.69 | | COMET::WADE | Hey batter batter SUWING batter! | Fri Apr 19 1991 12:38 | 8 |
| Carlos........
Do Mark Lefebvre! ;^)
Faiders sip!
Claybroon
|
36.70 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Fri Apr 19 1991 12:41 | 7 |
| The word is that the Donks are negotiating with the Brownstains (tm)
for the #2 slot, and they want Todd Lyght.
I still wish they could make a deal with Dallas for the 12 and 13
picks.
Mike JN
|
36.71 | Perry is gone...finally! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Apr 22 1991 12:32 | 46 |
| 1st round-Mike Croel, OLB, Nebraska, 6-2, 232 lbs.
I was upset that they didn't pick Lyght when he was available, but it's
one of those things where we'll just have to wait a year or 2 and see
how it turns out. I sure hope I'm wrong. Croel is extremely quick for
a linebacker, and they say he can even cover a wide receiver he's so
fast. He's also a very good pass-rusher. I watched my tape of the
CU-Nebraska game the other night, and wasn't particularly impressed by
Croel. He seemed to be blocked out of the play fairly easily, but his
speed was definitely evident. In defense of him though, Nebraska sent
him back in coverage quite a bit, CU didn't pass all that much, and
they ran away from him alot. Plus, that's only one game.
2nd round-Reggie Johnson, TE, Florida State, 6-1, 256 lbs.
Great blocking tight end, but certainly not a great receiver, although
they didn't throw the ball to him that much at FSU. I think he's an
excellent player for Reeves' offense, but he probably could've been had
in the 3rd or even 4th round. Plus, Adrian Cooper of Oklahoma was also
a great blocker and a little more proven as a receiver. Cooper was
taken in the 4th by Pittsburgh.
3rd round-Keith Traylor, ILB, Central State, Oklahoma, 6-2, 260 lbs.
May have been the best ILB in this draft, and I saw him projected by
some experts as a first-rounder. Denver certainly wasn't going for
need here, but they probably took the best player available with this
pick. The 4 starters at LB are very solid (assuming Croel to be a
starter) but they do need the depth, and this guy hopefully will
provide it.
4th round-Derek Russell, WR, Arkansas, 6-0, 179 lbs.
Great move by Denver here. They didn't have a 4th round pick, but
traded Gerald Perry and a 12th round pick to the Rams for this pick and
Gaston Green. Green was a 1st round pick 3 years ago. He was 4th in
the league in kickoff returns and will probably end up being that
backup to Humphrey. If Perry gets suspended by the league, Denver will
send a future draft pick to the Rams. As for Russell, he's not afraid
to go over the middle and averaged over 20 yards a reception last year.
If Denver goes with 5 WR's, Russell, Sharpe, or Nattiel will probably
be the odd man out.
Since Denver didn't take a QB, they probably either think Kubiak will
be ready for the regular season or have their sights set on a trade.
They are supposedly interested in Scott Erney, who is the starter for
Barcelona of the WLAF. Reeves said he would've taken Dan McGuire if he
was still on the board when Denver picked in the 2nd round.
Joe
|
36.72 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Mon Apr 22 1991 15:46 | 6 |
| Did Craig Erickson (QB Miami) get picked yet?
He wouldn't be a bad Elway backup, and he would have a couple years to
learn the system, either as the heir designate, if he were to blossom,
or as a continued backup when Elway's replacement comes along.
Mike JN
|
36.73 | Draft Update...Draft Update... | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Apr 22 1991 16:28 | 23 |
| Today's Bronco picks:
5th round-Greg Lewis, RB, Washington
6th round-Nick Subis, OL, San Diego State
7th round-no pick
8th round-Kenny Walker, DE, Nebraska
9th round-Don Gibson, OL, USC
10th round-Curtis Mayfield, WR, Oklahoma State
Personally, I don't understand Denver picking Lewis. I don't know when
or where Erickson went, but they said he was available. Plus, Lewis
projects as nothing more than a backup to Humphrey, and they just got
that in Gaston Green. Kenny Walker pick is certainly interesting.
He's one of the fastest defensive linemen in the draft, but they said
he dropped this far because he is considering going to grad school and
giving up football. Nick Subis is listed as a center, but can play
anywhere along the OL. I was impressed with Mayfield against CU this
past season.
Also, I heard Mike Stonebreaker of ND went to the Bears in the 9th
round.
Joe
|
36.74 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:24 | 6 |
| re: Erickson
He went to the Eagles in the fifth round.
Dennis
|
36.75 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:31 | 14 |
| Year in and year out the Bears have one of the most solid drafts in the
league. I wish Dan would ask his buddy Mike for the secret, because,
except for some occasional flurries of competence, the Donks have
really got some lemons over the years.... and I don't just mean hte
usual gambles that don't pay off. I mean some first, and second, round
picks thtat knowledgeable fans said: What!?!?? They can't be serious!
And then, of course, they're right.
Wasting that pick on Lewis doesn't seem especially bright to me. They
can roll in some plan B's or free agents if they just need some RB's
for practice.
Mike JN
|
36.76 | | REFINE::ASHE | What happened to Sarah Purcell? | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:41 | 5 |
| re .74:
Does that mean with Buddy gone, so is Jimmy Mac?
|
36.77 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Apr 23 1991 13:38 | 19 |
| So what do you guys think about the Shawn Moore pick in the 11th round?
In case you've been in a cave since last night, the Broncos stole Shawn
Moore in the 11th round. I just can't believe this guy fell all the
way to the 11th round. Teams may have been scared away by his
late-season thumb injury and the fact that he may jump to the CFL.
Similar situation to Major Harris, maybe? The Broncos need to get him
signed. They'll undoubtedly need to pay more than your typical 11th
round pick, but the fact of the matter is that it looks like they'll
need a new backup going into next season, other than someone like a
Tony Eason.
Mr. Hunt, you hear anything about why he may have slipped this far, and
is his thumb completely healed?
The one area Denver didn't address in the draft was cornerback. I
guess they're confident they can get 2 decent starters out of
Henderson, Lang, Dimry, and Braxton.
Joe
|
36.78 | Good talent, nice pick ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:03 | 3 |
| Moore is a far better QB than Major Harris ... and I can't see how the
thumb injury was responsible for a drop to the 11th round, unless it
was amputated ...
|
36.79 | | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:33 | 16 |
|
Shawn Moore never demonstrated that he can throw the ball accurately. Most of
his college completions were lofted balls to Herman Moore who simply out lept
the covering cornerback or safety.
He never demonstrated the ability to throw the quick out with any accuracy. I
bet that he rated low in the scouting combines for arm strength also. Most of
the scouts thought he was a clone of Rice from ND 2 years ago.
I'm sure Erickson rated low due to size and arm strength also.
Unless you're a big stud and play in a pro set offense in college you can be
pretty sure that your not going to be a top draft pick in the NFL.
Metz
|
36.80 | | ZEMI::HEISER | JCM 900 rules! | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:39 | 3 |
| > <<< Note 36.78 by EARRTH::BROOKS "I'm having an old friend for dinner..." >>>
nice p_n Doc ;-) A funny line from a real disgusting movie.
|
36.81 | Moore >>>>> Rice | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:39 | 14 |
|
> He never demonstrated the ability to throw the quick out with any accuracy. I
> bet that he rated low in the scouting combines for arm strength also. Most of
> the scouts thought he was a clone of Rice from ND 2 years ago.
A clone of Tony 'Bounce Pass' Rice?!?! They've gotta be kidding! Rice
was strictly an option QB with very little accuracy or arm strength.
Moore looked like more of a drop-back passer with a great ability to
scramble, run and improvise. The guy I would compare him to is
Cunningham. I agree that Moore isn't one of the more accurate passers,
but I certainly thought he had a strong arm.
Joe
|
36.82 | HTH | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:09 | 8 |
| Joe, Doc,
The one scouting report I read about Shawn Moore said "Destined to
follow Major Harris and Tony Rice - not a pro quarterback. Canada an
option."
JD
|
36.83 | | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:46 | 13 |
|
Strong Arm does not simply mean the ability to throw the ball 60+ yards in
the air. Having a strong arm relates more to throwing the quick out with enough
steam that it doesn't rainbow and gets to the receiver before the DB does.
Marino,Elway and Cunningham have excellent arms. Montana has a good arm. Steve
Walsh has an adequate arm.
Moore doesn't have it.
Metz
|
36.84 | Didn't expect him to go higher than 9-10th round... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Apr 23 1991 18:38 | 11 |
|
There's also that ACC competition thing, where everytime you looked up
Herman Moore seemed to be about ten yards in the clear. It probably
didn't help that Shawn Moore was operating with a wounded limb during
the time all the post-season fun versus better defenses was going on,
either.
Comparisons to Cunningham? No way...
glenn
|
36.85 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Tue Apr 23 1991 19:27 | 23 |
| Sorry Metz, but I saw Moore a few times, and his arm strength is
certainly better than advertised. Granted, he is far from polished, but
to compare him to Tony Rice ? Ridiculous !
Moore was a lot more adaptable as a QB, playing option, pro-set, a
little wishbone, whatever ...
Moore certainly has the arm and the raw talent to play in the NFL.
re Erickson,
And when are the scouts going to learn that arm strength isn't
everything ?
You guys act as if arm strength is The Gospel. Hell, the sainted Joe
Montana did not have sufficient arm strength either, if you listened to
the 'experts' .... now of course Metz and others see him as having a
'good arm' ... heh heh heh ...
The more I watch a draft, the more I agree with John H. - players are
not judged enough on *how they play the game* ....
Here's rootin' for Moore and Erickson ...
|
36.86 | Let's not make this a racial rathole...... | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Tue Apr 23 1991 19:54 | 45 |
| > Moore was a lot more adaptable as a QB, playing option, pro-set, a
> little wishbone, whatever ...
None of which makes him a bonafide NFL talent. Doc, You gotta realize
that for every Shawn Moore out there that gets mega publicity and tv exposure
there are 3 Kolvaks or Mcgwire's that play in relative college obscurity but
are constantly watched by the scouts.
> Moore certainly has the arm and the raw talent to play in the NFL.
Obviously the NFL scouts,GM's and coaches disagree with you. With your
track record at picking qb stars (Ware, Harris) I'll stick with the scouts
opinions. However he might be a good project to turn into a defensive back
(just kidding :-)
You have to remember that the NFL is big business. The combines are geared to
try and draft players that won't fail. For every late round Johnny Johnson that
makes a big impact there are 10 examples of players that did exactly what was
expected of them when drafted. It's not a perfect system but it's success speaks
for itself. The team wastes more on a first round draft choice failure than it
makes up with a late round success story.
> You guys act as if arm strength is The Gospel. Hell, the sainted Joe
> Montana did not have sufficient arm strength either, if you listened to
> the 'experts' .... now of course Metz and others see him as having a
> 'good arm' ... heh heh heh ...
Never did I state the Arm strength is the gospel of QB's. Nor did I
professionally rate Joe Montana's arm coming out of college and give my input
to the 49ers. There are plenty of strong armed qb's in an NFL uniform that I
think are stiffs (BJ Tolliver, Jay Schroeder, Bubby Brister ). Face the facts
though. You aren't going to be an NFL qb in this day and age without the tools
for the job. Arm strength, height and mobility are the physical tools needed.
Intelligence, adaptability and coolness are some of the mental traits needed.
The NFL seems to place a priority on the physical over the mental by assuming
that with the physical tools any player can be taught to be a QB. I disagree but
that doesn't make Doug Flutie any taller and you can't teach height.
Metz
|
36.87 | Let's not get defensive ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Wed Apr 24 1991 11:02 | 2 |
| Hey, there is no racial rathole ... of course people will see what they
want to ...
|
36.88 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:11 | 13 |
| I have to agree with the Doc (despite his shamless attempt to
steal my only TM). Most of these "expert" pro scouts don't know
their arse from their elbow. Was Montana highly touted? Or
Cunningham? How about Moon or Theisman? Weren't the Dolphins said
to be wasting their first draft pick when they took a "suspect"
Marino. Remember the guy who was going to be better than Hannah,
Brown or Shell? In case you don't here's a few hints. He plays
for Green Bay, likes Guns & Roses, and sucks as a football player.
Tony MandaRICH. Usually when the scouts unanimously agree you're
looking a one sorry specimen of a football player. Remember I said
"usually".
/Don
|
36.89 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:37 | 4 |
| ...but /Don, they were certainly right about Ken Simms! Remeber what
'they'said back then: "there should be 2 drafts, one for Simms and
another for everybody else!"
Denny
|
36.90 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Wed Apr 24 1991 13:52 | 7 |
| /Don (adn DOC) Yeah, and for every Runningham and Montana and
Theismann they are wrong about, there are a zillion players they are
right on the money about.
They are exceptions, not the rules.
JD
|
36.91 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Apr 24 1991 14:20 | 8 |
| No JD. The NFL did a study of first round draft picks for the
80's and the exact number may be different, but I believe less than
50% of the first round draft picks started for their respective
teams and less than 50% of those made the Pro Bowl. Clearly something
is wrong here. Anybody remember this? It was one of the reasons
the owners wanted to initiate a minimum wage for rookies.
/Don
|
36.92 | 100 correct draft choices to 1 bad one isn't a bad ratio..... | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Wed Apr 24 1991 14:22 | 16 |
|
BTW - The scouts opinions on Tony the MandaRICH were changing up until draft
day. A few of the better scouts were saying that he had slow feet. This
it turns out is true, which is why he's such a piss poor pass blocker.
However the scouting combines were still in awe of his brute strength.
He is a perfect reason why the Raiders and a few other teams employ independent
scouts instead of listiening to the combines 100%
Doc,
No slur meant on the racial thing. I just mentioned it because you have used it
in the past as a reason why a player didn't get drafted....
Metz
|
36.93 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 24 1991 14:23 | 4 |
| The draft is nothing more than a crap shoot and all the scouting and
evaluation is only meant to improve the odds a little bit.
John
|
36.94 | NFL owners want a wage scale....intentions are purely honorable I'm sure... | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Wed Apr 24 1991 14:27 | 11 |
|
slasher,
Did they continue the study and see how many 2nd round draft choices started and
made the pro bowl? how about 3rd,4th and 5th....
It's a very misleading study (financed by the NFL owners I'm sure) if they just
used the 2 metrics you stated.
Metz
|
36.95 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers�...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Apr 24 1991 15:11 | 10 |
| Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
scale for a less restricted free agency setup. That way the owners
would be paying those that produce not just those who went to a
major university and have "potential". One of the other benefits
would be the elimination of agents for college players because they
really wouldn't need the services of an agent until their first
or second year as a pro. The current setup really hurts the middle
to late rounder who becomes a good but not a great player.
/Don
|
36.96 | | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Let Sununu hitchhike! | Wed Apr 24 1991 15:31 | 9 |
| > Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
>scale for a less restricted free agency setup.
I think the NFL will move in the opposite direction. Tagliabue said
during draft day that Plan B won't continue (didn't say exactly when).
Given the weakness of the player's union, there will be even less free
agency if any at all.
Dan
|
36.97 | I'm an engineer so I get free agency and low pay :-) | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Wed Apr 24 1991 15:57 | 19 |
| > > Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
> >scale for a less restricted free agency setup.
It all depends on where I was drafted :-)....If I'm a first round choice I don't
want a rookie wage scale because I can sign for big $$$ and the sit on my butt
for the rest of my short career (call it the Boz stategy)
If I'm a middle to late round choice I want more free agency because I can show
my stuff and then sign with another team for big $$$. If I'm a proven pro player
I want free agency also.
If I'm NFL management I want a salary scale based on years of service with no
incentives and no free agency.......
Metz
|
36.98 | | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Wed Apr 24 1991 16:38 | 27 |
| re .92
Metz I have mentioned it (the racial angle) in the past because I
beleived it to have been true in some cases. If you disagree fine, it
is your right. If confronting the issue makes you uncomfortable (it
must have for you to bring it out of the blue), that's too bad (and I
don't mean that as a slam) - I call it as I see it (and I can prove a
few cases, but that - for now - is beside the point).
And please note that I also voiced simular feelings about Craig
Erickson as well ....
As for McGwire, he was not a hidden player - mostly because of his
height and his lineage ... it will be interesting to watch him in
action.
re Scouting,
I have seen scouts 'blow' more than a few cases. Perhaps the player
hasn't/didn't reach(ed) the All-Pro level, but he was a pretty
productive player.
Sometimes there is too much emphasis on the numbers (the Cowboys and
Paul Brown can be thanked for that), and not enough on intangibles and
sheer ability to play the game.
Doc
|
36.99 | Yawn!!!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Apr 24 1991 19:09 | 6 |
| Isn't there an NFL draft note for all this "opinionated" debate?
I heard that the 3rd round choice for Denver was arrested before the
draft. Looks like he will fit right in;^^
Tim
|
36.100 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | I need some sensible shoes | Thu Apr 25 1991 12:24 | 7 |
| Remember you guy's DON'T start intellectual Discussions in the Donk note !
Geez you'd think that Denver picked up a QB that could throw on the
run because John boy tend to do the same.
Jeff
|
36.101 | Another LB | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue May 21 1991 20:29 | 12 |
| The Broncs signed an ex-Pueblo Crusader yesterday. His name slips
the mind, but he is 6'2" and 233 lbs. The radio station dj said he was
a DE, but at that size?
This guy held the record for sacks in the minor leaque. His total
was 33 sacks for 1 year. It was probably the year they beat the
Colorado Springs Spirit for the minor title.
He is going to be tried out at outside LB.
Tim
|
36.102 | Is Baseball over with yet? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:48 | 7 |
| training camps have started...big deal right?
Well in the case of good junk noting, Elway will win MVP this year
as well as finally winning his 1st ring by beating, who else..The
Vikings!!
Tim
|
36.103 | Football season starts July 12th!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Wed Jun 19 1991 15:28 | 9 |
| > training camps have started...big deal right?
Actually, it is a big deal when you consider we've had to live without
any football since January. The camp the Broncos are having right now
is just a voluntary minicamp - mostly rookies and quarterbacks. The
Broncos open training camp on July 12th.
Joe
|
36.104 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Jun 19 1991 18:38 | 11 |
| > Elway will win MVP this year as well as finally winning his first
> ring....
Winning his first ring? We will see, but don't bet the house
on it! (Hmmm, now where have I heard that before...:-)
Seriously though, I think Elway will start out having a good season,
then his age; injuries, slower legs, etc... will cath up to him,
and he'll have to give way to Kojak or whatever his name is....
Carlos
|
36.105 | #1?? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Jun 19 1991 19:57 | 12 |
| WOW!!! A Faider fan saying Elway will start good? Just that
little bit is a shock to the eyes;^^^
Hopefully this year the Broncs will only have a few "incidents"
compared to the past few years, espeacially since Perry is histo.
Minus injuries, look for the defense to have a good year. Watch
for Lelo (sp?) Lang to challenge strongly for the starting CB spot over
Henderson. I know, it shouldn't be to difficult considering Hernderson
is slow a Hienz ketchup....
Tim
|
36.106 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | Is it DECrap or De Crap??? | Wed Jun 19 1991 20:13 | 12 |
| Is Mile High Stadium sold out for all of the Donks games????
I'm going to be in Colorado Springs from Sept 15th thru October 18th
and would like to take in a game if'n I can get tickets.
Which brings up my next point, are the Donks at home between these
dates at all?????
Thanks,
JaKe
|
36.107 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jun 20 1991 09:34 | 8 |
| Sept 15 Seattle
Sept 22 San Diego
Sept 29 at Minnesota
Oct 6 at Houston
Oct 13 Open Date
Oct 20 Kansas City
John
|
36.108 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid | Thu Jun 20 1991 10:00 | 5 |
|
the team is so pathetic Jake it should be easy to get tickets. Especially if
you wait till the oct 20th game because by then they'll be out of the race.
;^)
|
36.109 | Why see the Broncos when you can watch Pittsburgh!?! | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Thu Jun 20 1991 10:53 | 6 |
| Jake,
I think there's a Steelers club in Colorado Springs. Let me know if
you want info on whom to contact and where to see the games.
--dan'l
|
36.110 | Spanish 101 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Jun 20 1991 11:01 | 16 |
|
Just thought I'd throw this in, in the hopes that other
anti-Donks might appreciate it. In the Spanish language (might
be slang ??) there is a term for a little donkey, or ass, that is
pronounced 'way', although the spelling might be a little different.
Usually when it's used to describe a person it's not done with the
kindest of intentions, your basically calling them an ass, or imbecile.
Also in Spanish, the word 'El' (like El Cid) means 'the', so then
when you put them both together 'El way' or Elway, I think you guys
can see the ironic humor of it especially considering he plays for
the Donks.......many :-)
Carlos
|
36.111 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Thu Jun 20 1991 12:41 | 15 |
| Jake,
Yes, all the games are sold out, so you can't get tickets through the
ticket office. However, if you go up to one of the games an hour or 2
early, I can guarantee you will find tickets at or below face value
being sold around the stadium. The best place to go is the west side
of the stadium (right near the ticket office), or go to a bar near the
stadium and ask the people working there if there's any tickets for
sale. One exception might be a Faider game, but they're not playing in
Denver when you are here anyway so you shouldn't have any problem.
P.S.- You're leaving CS a day early. Boo Hoo Lou's boys are playing at
the Academy on the 19th. Oh well.
Joe
|
36.112 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Charter member of Quoteaholics Anonymous | Thu Jun 20 1991 13:24 | 7 |
|
re .110
Boy CArlos that note is really going to embarass Francis Ass, er Frank
Way.
Bruce
|
36.113 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:20 | 6 |
| Another good spot for tickets is on the off ramp as you get off I-25,
19th ave I believe is the exit.
re- Carlos, It took you this long to come up with that one?
Tim
|
36.114 | | CELTIK::JACOB | DO NOTHING....and then Rest | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:36 | 10 |
| Thanks for the info.
The only game the Donks play at home while I'll be there is the San
Diego game. Maybe I'll take the advice and head up to Denver.
Dan'l,. send me the info on the Steelers Club in the Springs. I'd hate
to miss a month of the Steelers AFC Central championship season.
JaKe
|
36.115 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Jun 20 1991 16:52 | 11 |
| > Carlos, It took you this long to come up with that one?
Hey Tim,
Actually I can't take credit for coming up with it, I overheard
it some time during the last few years while watching a Donk game
with some friends. It has taken me this long to enter it in here
though. I guess it's just one of those things you save for just
the right time, and this note has been pretty lame lately so I thought
I'd throw it in just to stir things up a little.
Carlos
|
36.116 | hide the women and children | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Fri Jun 21 1991 12:31 | 5 |
|
Oh no! Jake is invading C Springs? What're we gonna do
about this guys?
Claybone
|
36.117 | | ECAMV3::JACOB | Is it DECrap or De Crap??? | Fri Jun 21 1991 16:55 | 16 |
|
><<< Note 36.116 by GENRAL::WADE "IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel" >>>
> -< hide the women and children >-
Better hide the sheep and dogs, too!!!!!
(8^0* (8^)*
JaKe
Any bars out there where you can toss mid.....Nah, Fergit it!!!!
(8^)*
|
36.118 | Pittsburgh CS Club | SHALOT::MEDVID | the addiction of duplicities | Sat Jun 22 1991 13:08 | 13 |
| Jake,
couldn't send mail to your node so here's the info on the CS Steelers
Club:
Pittsburgh Colorado Springs Club
contact Jack Dowds
Home: 719\574-7568
Work: 719\579-3489 or 719\579-5250
Never talked to Jack but you can still tell him how you got his name.
--dan'l
|
36.119 | Parade in January ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Remote Selling Services | Mon Jun 24 1991 16:33 | 11 |
| The mini-camp provided insight that only a one sport city i.e. Denver could
produce Elways muscles.
Kubiak's back is fixed.
Braxton's Knee is stronger than ever.
Nattiel is going to be a ALL-PRO.
The wr's are running with parachutes because they are sooo fast.
The O-line is meditating via Kung-Fu on visualizing winning.
|
36.120 | | GENRAL::WADE | IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel | Tue Jun 25 1991 12:09 | 18 |
|
Oh well, since Hoot isn't around anymore...........
It seems ole Bobby Humphrey and Mel Bratton were riding
around in Bobby's new Jeep Cherokee the other night.
They crashed into another vehicle. The occupants of
the other vehicle (the hittees ;^) ) say that Bobby
and Mel switched places so that it would apear that
Mel was the driver. Bobby had alcohol on his breath.
He is currently on probation for a DUI he received
about a year(?) ago.
The Donks organization is *helping* out by providing the
hittees with a loaner car while this mess gets cleared
up. Bobby didn't have insurance. Mel has been charged
with the traffic violations. Stay tuned........
Claybone
|
36.121 | Carlos = closet Bronco fan ;^^ | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Jun 25 1991 13:26 | 12 |
| No not Bobby..... I remember when Micheal Brooks rolled his Cherokee
last year.
I'm glad I don't live in Denver, heck I probably would get hit by
one of these guys. Of course, all of us that have been to Denver knows
what bad drivers there are on the road, and the worst part, is most,
whether they live there or not, are originaly from outta town.
Well, does this mean its Bobbies 2nd offense? I don't remember him
getting "dinged" forr it last year..
Tim
|
36.122 | Marinovich = next Montana | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Jun 25 1991 14:22 | 12 |
| Ahh...the travesty continues....:-)
Reeves proberly loant them a mercedes and offered them season tickets
to drop all the charges....that scum bag....
> -< Carlos = closet Bronco fan ;^^ >-
Ooofff, God that was way below the belt Tim, that's OK though 'cause
come Sept. 8th I'll be the one smilin, while you'll seriously be
considering switching loyalties to a real football team :-)
Carlos
|
36.123 | Your not speakin' saprano are ya? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jun 27 1991 10:23 | 2 |
| re- real football team, you mean the giants or bears, at least
according to some of their faithfuls;^^
|
36.124 | Who's the leader of the pack that's made for you and me | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Jun 28 1991 16:15 | 12 |
| > -< Your not speakin' saprono are ya? >-
Tim, it wouldn't matter even if I was speakin' in my best Mickey
Mouse imitation, the record between our two teams speaks all for
itself, (I'm not 100% on this but...) I think in the last seven meetings
between the Raiders and the Donks the Raiders have won six. 6-1
is an excellent record against your powerful Donks don't you think?
Heck, even giving the Donks the benefit of the doubt would put the
Raiders at 5-2, which is still very good, especially considering
that the Raiders didn't return to their normal form 'til last year.
Carlos
|
36.125 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Fri Jun 28 1991 18:01 | 27 |
| > (I'm not 100% on this but...) I think in the last seven meetings
> between the Raiders and the Donks the Raiders have won six. 6-1
Well, you're close Carlos.
90: Raiders, 2-0
89: 1-1
88: Raiders, 2-0
87: Broncos, 2-0
86: Broncos, 2-0
85: Raiders, 2-0
84: Broncos, 2-0
The Raiders don't have 6 of the last 7, but do have 5 of the last 6.
However, the series is tied 7-7 over the last 7 years, and Denver won 6
out of 8 from '84 to '87. The Raiders still have a big lead in this
overall series, but Denver didn't have a winning record until '75 or
'76. From 1977 on, with the exception of '89, one team has swept the
season series. And although LA does have the overall lead, since '77
it's probably very close and Denver might even have a slight lead. I'd
have to check.
Joe
P.S.- I haven't included 1991, which will be Denver 2, LA 0 :)
|
36.126 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Jun 28 1991 19:34 | 7 |
| Thanks Joe, that's some pretty interesting stuff, amazing how (with
the '89 exception) they've had a sweep for thirteen of the last
fourteen years. It also seems to me that the majority of the time,
whenever these two teams play, the final score is within a touchdown.
Carlos
|
36.127 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jul 01 1991 09:53 | 42 |
| The all time series stands 41-19-2 in favor of the Raiders and has gone
like this:
1960 Split 1-1
1961 Split 2-2
1962 Den 2-0 2-4
1963 Raid 2-0 4-4 (this year started 9 years of no Denver
wins)
1964 Raid 1-0-1 5-4-1
1965 Raid 2-0 7-4-1 (begins string of 14 Raider wins)
1966 Raid 2-0 9-4-1
1967 Raid 2-0 11-4-1
1968 Raid 2-0 13-4-1
1969 Raid 2-0 15-4-1
1970 Raid 2-0 17-4-1
1971 Raid 2-0 19-4-1
1972 split 20-5-1
1973 Raid 1-0-1 21-5-2
1974 split 22-6-2
1975 Raid 2-0 24-6-2
1976 Raid 2-0 26-6-2
1977 Den 2-1 27-8-2 (Denver wins in playoffs)
1978 Den 2-0 27-10-2
1979 Raid 2-0 29-10-2
1980 Raid 2-0 31-10-2
1981 Den 2-0 31-12-2
1982 Raid 1-0 32-12-2 (only 1 game that year - strike)
1983 Raid 2-0 34-12-2
1984 Den 2-0 34-14-2
1985 Raid 2-0 36-14-2
1986 Den 2-0 36-16-2
1987 Den 2-0 36-18-2
1988 Raid 2-0 38-18-2
1989 split 39-19-2
1990 Raid 2-0 41-19-2
It's not recent history that's responsible for the wide edge the
Raiders have in the series, it's really the 1963-1976 time period.
Since 1977, the series has been virtually even at 15-13 in favor of the
Raiders.
John
|
36.128 | Thanks John! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Colorado Football: #1 for 1990 | Mon Jul 01 1991 18:29 | 1 |
|
|
36.129 | Football season starts Friday | BSS::JCOTANCH | It's almost football season! | Mon Jul 08 1991 13:54 | 24 |
| Broncos open training camp Friday.
Elway's back is doing fine, but everyone's keeping their fingers
crossed that it stays that way.
There's rumors around that Vance may be traded. He's certainly
expendable considering that Sharpe should continue to get better
(although he is projected to be used mostly at H-back this year), and
they drafted Curtis Mayfield and that other receiver from Arkansas.
However, if Nattiel doesn't show signs of coming back from a couple of
injury-plagued seasons, he could be the odd man out.
Kenny Walker looked real good in the mini-camp. The question now isn't
if he'll make the team, but how much he'll play.
Alphonso Carreker is expected to miss all of training camp because of
his back problem.
Coaches are so confident in Braxton's ability to come back after his
knee injury, they will be putting plan B signee Charles Dimry on the
right side to compete against Wymon Henderson.
Joe
|
36.130 | | RDOVAX::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Jul 08 1991 16:14 | 6 |
| Joe,,
What's the status of Shawn Moore?
Rich
|
36.131 | Shawn Moore 3rd string QB | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Remote Selling Services | Mon Jul 08 1991 16:42 | 1 |
| the Enver Bronco's finish 7-9 this year cause there is no "D" in Enver.
|
36.132 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jul 11 1991 17:52 | 10 |
| Back from vacaction, and not much happening here. Good info John.
Steve Sewell and Braxton signed contracts yesterday.
Brooks might play holdout. Why?, he says its 'cause he was the
leading tackler last year. I just don't see him deserving the $$ that
he wants. He still needs to prove himself, and don't be suprised to
see a big challenge for his job by both of the rookies.
Tim
|
36.133 | info | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Jul 15 1991 12:57 | 3 |
| Does anyone have an update on who hasn't signed yet?
Are Humphrey and Atewater still holding out?
|
36.134 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | It's almost football season! | Mon Jul 15 1991 13:07 | 6 |
| Atwater and Humphrey are still holding out. Outside of those two, only
unsigned players remaining are Nattiel, 1st-round pick Croel and
2nd-round pick Johnson. Clevescum signed their top pick this past
weekend, so that should help get Croel signed sometime soon.
Joe
|
36.135 | Humphrey is a hurtin himself | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Remote Selling Services | Mon Jul 15 1991 13:49 | 12 |
| Humphrey and Atwater both have 2 years left on the contracts. What is it these
kids go home for the summer and get STUPID or somethin Denver won 5 games last
year I don't care if Humphrey and Atwater carried the team 5 wins doesn't mean
more money.
I tell DEC cause we had a bad year I want MORE MONEY. We got too many greedy
people in Pro-Sports today.
Gastom Green looks good but Reeves will have him play H-back or Fullback and
rely on him to block. That what made himn a plan B singer anyway.
Jeff
|
36.136 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Mon Jul 15 1991 16:08 | 28 |
|
> Brooks might play holdout. Why?, he says its 'cause he was the
> leading tackler last year. I just don't see him deserving the $$ that
> he wants. He still needs to prove himself, and don't be suprised to
> see a big challenge for his job by both of the rookies.
Brooks is back in camp, but won't get any challenge from Croel, because
Croel will be used strictly as an outside 'backer. Meanwhile, Traylor
is an insider. Croel will battle Tim Lucas for the LOLB position, but
free agent Jeff Mills enters camp as the starter for that position.
RE: Riggen
I also heard Green looked good after a couple workouts, but I have a
hard time believing that he would be tried at fullback because he's
only listed at 192 pounds. I would think they may also use Green as a
kick returner, because he did quite a bit of that for the Rams, and
with good success.
Kenny Walker, who weighed about 240 coming out of Nebraska, is up to
264.
As for Shawn Moore, he should get quite a bit of playing time in the
preseason because Denver has 5 games and Kubiak probably won't play in
the first 2 or 3, at least. Kubiak is supposed to be back in pads
August 1st. Moore will battle Pat Hegarty for the 3rd QB position.
Joe
|
36.137 | Thanks fur the info | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:34 | 14 |
| Isn't Gaston Green a fumbler? If my memory serves me, he seemed
to run well for the Rams, but he couldn't hold onto the ball. Please
tell me I'm wrong.
Croel should get is butt into camp since the 1st pre-game is only 2
weeks away. I'm not worried about Nattiel. I do agree with Jeff's way
of thinkin'.
Those 2 guys held out in thier rookie year, and they did get some
decent contracts, besides, isn't a contract supposed to be the legal
way of making someone play? I see fine thier butts 10k a day!! That
would teach 'em..... How sadistic....
Tim
|
36.138 | but atleast you got a stud mufffin for a QB... | AGNT99::CHILDS | sign said, Stay Away Fool.. | Mon Jul 15 1991 20:40 | 12 |
|
Yes Tim Gaston Green he of fine moves and speed is indeed a fumbler better
yet he's all-world practice player!!! When the real games start he plays
like RCASO spells...
wish Denver had more of his type...wait a minute actually they do...
glad I could help out...
your pal
the anti....
|
36.140 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jul 16 1991 11:07 | 3 |
| Speaking of HOOT, anyone seen him or the Parrot lately? How they
doing in the 'real world'?
Denny
|
36.141 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Tue Jul 16 1991 11:28 | 6 |
|
MikeC,
Who is this stud-muffin of a QB you refer to? ;^)
Claybone
|
36.142 | Hoot still spending the TFSO ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Remote Selling Services | Tue Jul 16 1991 12:55 | 4 |
| Hoot must eat his words cause last I heard Hoot was at a family reunion in
Ohio.
Jeff
|
36.143 | Call him closet man | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Jul 16 1991 13:40 | 9 |
| Last I heard, Monty was still a council member in Green Mtn. Falls.
I don't know what he really does for a living.
Gee thanks for the Green info Mike. RE-1, I would like to know who
this stud muffin is too. If your refering to Biffy, then that means
you really do care about him;^ Why don't you admit that you like to
wear your orange when the donks are playing;^^^^^
Tim
|
36.144 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jul 16 1991 14:07 | 4 |
| I thought the parrot was going to be a fireman when he checked out
of DEC. Maybe he decided on brain surgery instead. :^)
Sheesh, we even bust these guys when they're gone. What a crew!
Denny
|
36.145 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Jul 16 1991 15:42 | 3 |
| > -< but atleast you got a stud muffin for a QB... >-
You probably think Ali-Sheeba is cute too! huh? :-)
|
36.146 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Jul 17 1991 07:42 | 10 |
| Ha ha ha, this is toooooo much. Monty and Hoot being remembered in the
Donk note! Ha ha ha. :*)
I know, this is where they spent a lot of their noting time, but it
seems strange that they are remembered here, more than in the Raider
note. :*)
lEe
|
36.147 | | CAM::WAY | High Toned Son of a Bitch | Wed Jul 17 1991 09:06 | 7 |
| Yes, but Lee, look at it this way.
I'm sure General Sherman is much more remembered in Atlanta than in his
home town.....;^)
'Saw
|
36.148 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Wed Jul 17 1991 11:52 | 15 |
| Juriga has been bothered by back problems lately and will undergo some
tests today to see if the problems are serious or just something minor.
Juriga had been moved to left tackle, so right now that leaves Darrel
Hamilton as the starting left tackle.
Offensive lineman Nick Subis, this year's 6th round draft pick, hurt
his knee yesterday and is expected to miss 3 or 4 weeks.
Kenny Walker has been bothered by a strained hamstring, but returned to
practice yesterday.
No new news on holdouts Atwater and Humphrey, or unsigned players
Croel, Johnson, and Nattiel.
Joe
|
36.149 | Go ahead ... hit it. | SHALOT::HUNT | Things that make you go 'Hmmmm' ... | Wed Jul 17 1991 12:10 | 22 |
| In other ACC news, Duke junior Christian Laettner was named as the
ACC's Male Athlete Of The Year for his role in leading Duke to the
NCAA Division 1 basketball championship.
Laettner had finished 2nd to NC State's Rodney Monroe for the ACC's
Men's Basketball Player Of The Year award.
Virginia's Dawn Staley was selected as the ACC's Female Athlete Of
The Year for her role in leading the Lady Cavaliers to a 2nd-place
finish in the NCAA Women's Basketball Championship.
Florida State officially joined the ACC on 1-Jul-1991 as the ninth
member of the conference. They will play a full conference
basketball schedule in 1991-92 and will join the football race during
the 1992-93 season.
The ACC also was instrumental in bringing to life a new agreement
among the Orange, Sugar, Cotton, and Fiesta Bowls. As of the 1992
season, the ACC champion will be guaranteed a slot in any one of
these four top-notch bowl games.
Bob Hunt
|
36.150 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Wed Jul 17 1991 13:49 | 6 |
| Yo Robert,
I'm sure Joe didn't mind the ACC news..............except
the part about those weenie Virginia Cavaliers! :^)
Claybone
|
36.151 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Thu Jul 18 1991 13:19 | 14 |
| Hey Bob, thanks for the ACC news...keep it comin'! I'll tell ya, it
sure beats that ongoing Dean rathole. :^)
The Broncos held their first scrimmage last night, and the players who
impressed were Gaston Green, Shawn Moore, Randy Robbins, Simon
Fletcher, and Kenny Walker.
Juriga's exams on his back turned out good, so he should be back in
pads soon.
2nd round pick Reggie Johnson might be signed as early as Friday.
Joe
|
36.152 | | FTMUDG::REED | Sutton+Houston=1992NCAAChamps | Thu Jul 18 1991 13:29 | 5 |
| Joe, I haven't heard anything about Curtis Mayfield for a while. Is
he still around?
Cowboy
|
36.153 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | ACC notesfile--->hit next unseen | Thu Jul 18 1991 13:37 | 6 |
| Curtis Mayfield is still around, but I haven't heard anything about
he's doing. If nobody gets traded, he will probably have a tough time
making the roster unless he can beat out 4th round pick Derek Russell
from Arkansas.
Joe
|
36.154 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Jul 19 1991 14:05 | 1 |
| I guess DAnny is impressed with Russell, so watch out Nattiel.
|
36.155 | Four Bronco's arrested after fight ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Mon Jul 22 1991 16:43 | 8 |
| 4 Denver Bronco's were arrested Friday night outside a Greely Talc
establishment the "Armory".
I think it was something about the 1st annual "Gerald Perry lets get into
trouble night".
The only player I remember is Melvin Bratton RB.
Jeff
|
36.156 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Mon Jul 22 1991 18:41 | 10 |
|
Sorry Jeff, but the Armory doesn't quite qualify as a
TALC establishment. It's a part of the same chain of
bars as Meadow Muffins/O'Furry's.
Wasn't there a time when Pat Blowin'(tm) was looking for
meaner players (ie always in trouble?). I guess the
old saying about being careful what you wish for applies.
Claybone
|
36.157 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Mon Jul 22 1991 19:07 | 6 |
| It's a part of the same chain of
bars as Meadow Muffins/O'Furry's.
Clay;
Places with names like this aren't TALC joints ????
|
36.158 | As I know it | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Jul 22 1991 19:57 | 17 |
| Alton Montgomery was the only player to get hurt from my
understanding. From what Bratton said, some guy starting talking
%&$* to Alton, and finally they decided to take it outside.
This guy appearently threw a beer bottle as hard as he could at
Alton, so then Alton raise is arm to block it, and thus the bottle
breaking on his wrist area and then cutting him fairly deep.
Then I guess some pushing and shoving and "what not" happened until
the cops got there. I don't know who the other 2 players were.
Alton will be sidelined for ~ a week.
Alright guys, what does TALC stand for?
Tim
|
36.159 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Tue Jul 23 1991 10:47 | 7 |
|
Jake holds the trademark on T.A.L.C. I don't think
those bars qualify for the T and A portion of TALC.
I guess we need a definition from the source. How
'bout it Jake?
Claybone
|
36.160 | BLAM it on a DOG fan ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Tue Jul 23 1991 11:42 | 11 |
| The real truth.
Some Clevescum fan was moaning and groaning about the Bronco's beating them
repeatedly to get to the Stupid Bowl. Alton Montgomery quietly reminded
him that he was SWEATING profusly. The guy then obviosly in a steroid induced
fit of violent behavior threw a bottle at Montgomery causing Alton to SWEAT and
behave like a guy on the JUICE. Melvin Bratton happened to be cruisin by and
witnessed his teamate bleeding so he got out of his car and proceeded to
beat-up a man in blue. 2 other players were also sweating and cursing.
Jeff
|
36.161 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Jul 23 1991 11:54 | 19 |
| Montgomery received 13 stitches on his arm from being hit by the
bottle, but he practiced yesterday. The other 2 players involved
besides Montgomery and Bratton were Michael Brooks and Ronnie
Haliburton.
The Broncos had another scrimmage on Saturday and Gaston Green did very
well again. That was their last major scrimmage before the Lion game.
Shawn Moore may not play in Saturday's game because of the knee he
injured in practice last week.
Bronco preseason schedule: (All times are Mountain)
July 27 Detroit (at Canton) 10:30 am
Aug. 2 INDY 7:00 pm
Aug. 7 @ San Fran 7:00 pm
Aug. 19 MIAMI 6:00 pm
Aug. 23 @ Phoenix 8:30 pm
Joe
|
36.162 | | CAM::WAY | High Toned Son of a Bitch | Tue Jul 23 1991 11:56 | 14 |
| While Jake may hold the tm on TALC, the final two letters originated with
me.
T.A.L.C stands for Titles, Acquisitions, Liens and Contracts.
Titles and Acquisitions are self-explanatory.
Liens are LEGally binding,
Contracts, are, well, figure it out.....
hth,
'Saw
|
36.163 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Jul 23 1991 12:51 | 6 |
| Forgot to put in the holdout/signing info. 2nd round pick Reggie
Johnson and Ricky Nattiel signed contracts and were in camp last
Friday. Only unsigned player remaining is Croel; no news on Atwater or
Humphrey.
Joe
|
36.164 | Fishin' anyone? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Jul 24 1991 16:08 | 13 |
| I think they are dis-respectful. They are both going to make $600k
plus this year (if my memory serves me). They were all-pro last year,
but give it a rest. Heck even Elway has class not to hold out.
Well any predictions for this weekend?
Does Detroit still use the run-shoot? If so, then I think it will
be an offensive battle.
Of course it don't matter who wins, but I think the Donks will
prevail.
Tim
|
36.165 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Jul 24 1991 18:35 | 16 |
| >Well any predictions for this weekend?
Miami over the Bears - Miami is gonna be hard to stop this year!
Broncs over the Lions- I know, it's a shocker, me picking the broncs,
but I figure it's only pre-season, and Sanders
is probably not gonna play, so what the heck!
Raiders over Niners - Another shocker huh? The niner's will see
what a mistake they made not protecting Lott,
and Craig.
Eagle over the Bills - No comments.
Carlos
|
36.166 | FYI | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Wed Jul 24 1991 22:05 | 38 |
| As a public service to the Bronco fans, here's a run-down from various
NFL sources on Mike Croel, LB, Nebraska, #1 pick of the Broncos:
"He's a great player. When he decides to get it, he can be getting it
in about the second step. He can haul ass." -Reed Johnson, Denver
Broncos director of player personnel
"I don't have any problem with his instincts. He's not Broderick
Thomas coming out, but he's not far behind him." -Tom Braatz, Packers
"Athletically, he's outstanding. But they walk him off in coverage
alot there. He can go a whole game and you don't even know he's on the
field." -Dick Corrick, Oilers
"In terms of making plays that make the nightly news, no. Not that
type. And not a real big guy. But he can run, he can blitz, he can be
used in coverage, he plays the run well." -Ron Hughes, Detroit Lions
directory of player personnel
"He's not as big as Pat Swilling. He's like Cornelius Bennett. If you
have to line up and throw the ball, he's going to be in your face. If
you have to line up and run the ball, your back is going to have a
little room to run. Great kid." -Tom Boisture, Giants
"He's not Derrick Thomas, but could he give you some of the same
things? I don't see why he couldn't. He is a good an athlete as I've
ever seen at linebacker." -Charley Casserly, Redskins
"I think he's going to do nothing in the NFL. I think he's the most
non-instinctive football player I've ever seen." -Anonymous (NFL
personnel director)
"Not great instints. But he's got the speed to make up for a little
bit of late reaction." -Dick Steinberg, Jets.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.167 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jul 25 1991 13:43 | 22 |
| Tim,
I'm not positive about this, but I believe Atwater is only making
around $300K and is something like the 5th or 6th highest paid player
on the defense. If that's the case he does deserve more, but I agree
that he should honor his current contract. He will be rewarded
accordingly when this one runs out.
As for preseason, I think the average fan takes too much stock in his
team winning or losing. I watch a preseason with a totally different
mindset than I watch a regular season game. In preseason I like to see
how the first units look, how rookies and newcomers perform, and how
different combinations of players work, with winning just an afterthought.
And what a lot of people might not realize is the teams are playing
preseason games (especially the 1st couple) with a primary goal not of
winning but of evaluating young players instead. It's not really until
the last preseason game that coaches are fine-tuning their teams for the
regular season, which is why by that last game the first units usually
play at least 3 quarters. If Denver wins, fine; if they lose, big
deal. Now come regular season, turn up the intensity about 10 levels,
and it's not *how* they play the game, but whether they win or lose.
Joe
|
36.168 | Thanks Glenn! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Jul 25 1991 18:36 | 7 |
| I agree with you Joe. It is to evaluate the players.
I hope to see good things from Kenny Walker. Denver still needs alot
of help at pass rushing. Hopefully a corner back will show up, other
than Braxton, thats if he is healthy.
Tim
|
36.169 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jul 26 1991 14:53 | 15 |
| Reeves said Shawn Moore will play extensively in tomorrow's game.
Elway will see action for about 15-20 plays.
Gaston Green will start at tailback, and Robert Perryman will split
time with Bratton at fullback; Perryman will start.
These guys won't play because of injuries: Vance Johnson, Derek
Russell, Alphonso Carreker, Gary Kubiak, Jim Juriga, Nick Subis, and
Keith Traylor.
Here's some of the players I'll be most interested in watching: Moore,
Gaston Green, Greg Lewis, Jeff Mills (who will be playing where Croel
would be, LOLB), Reggie Johnson, Braxton, and Kenny Walker.
Joe
|
36.170 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Fri Jul 26 1991 17:25 | 5 |
| What's the deal with Crawford Ker, is he anticipated as a starter?
I think he was a solid pick up for the Donks, I also think that
Perryman's gonna help out alot blocking for Humph....
Carlos
|
36.171 | Watch out Gerald, here come Bratton | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Jul 26 1991 18:29 | 7 |
| I don't know anything about Ker. I have not heard his name mentioned
yet, until now. What position does he play?
Perryman is a "wait and see" kinda guy IMO. Wasn't he a slug for
the Patriots?
Tim
|
36.172 | Perryman = Pats castoff | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is a toddler now! | Mon Jul 29 1991 11:06 | 7 |
| re: Perryman
Pats dumped him last year because they thought he was "going thru the motions",
and not giving his all. When you're 1-15 I would imagine it is tough to stay in
the game at practice, but jeeze, you only play once a week.
=Bob=
|
36.173 | Tidbits from the glorified scrimmage | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jul 29 1991 12:51 | 14 |
| Pretty bland game, especially the 2nd half. Shawn Moore looked very good
for his first outing. He showed good poise staying in the pocket.
Green ran the ball well, but I wasn't too impressed with Greg Lewis,
although he did show good 2nd efforts. Kenny Walker was
disappointing, not even getting close to the Lions' QB's. OLB Jeff
Mills was in on a lot of plays and had 2 sacks. Offensive line,
especially left tackle, needs some work. Michael Young remains
Denver's best posession receiver. Dimry may have been the one beaten
on Detroit's 2nd TD, but he didn't get any help from the safeties, and
he simply underestimated Campbell's speed. Speaking of Campbell, it
was nice to see the ex-Buff have a great game. The Broncos miss
Atwater much more than Humphrey at this point.
Joe
|
36.174 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Jul 29 1991 13:09 | 5 |
| If Perryman's with the Donks now he's also a Dallas castoff. He was
with them lasted year.
Denny
|
36.175 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Jul 29 1991 13:59 | 13 |
| Didn't really catch much of this game. Didn't even know it was on
until I finished mowing the jungle called my lawn. I saw enough of Pat
Hagerty, and I wasn't impressed. I agree with Shawn Moore looking
good. I believe Dimry was slow, from the couple plays I saw him in.
I didn't notice much of a pass rush. If there isn't pressure on the
QB, then any CB or Safety will be burned given the time.
I will probably watch this Friday's game, but then again? Reeves
should have time to help them with their small inefficiencies (sp?).
Go Broncos....watta team!!!
|
36.176 | Jeff Dahmers for head coach | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Mon Jul 29 1991 16:14 | 11 |
| All I need to see was the offense taking the opening kickoff to the Detroit 4
then use three plays up the middle and off tackle for a 18yd FG. I gots' the
shakes from the 86 Superbowl next I see Dan Reeves pull the first team and
put in a guy Hagerty I thought doug Flutie would be better. By this time I'm
looking to my wife to take the kids this is gonna be a loooooonnnnnggggggg year.
Denver has been using parachutes on the players to make them run faster...
Seems to work great for the defense.
Jeff
|
36.177 | O'well, its only meaningless | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Jul 29 1991 19:12 | 16 |
| re-1
Jeff, Tell me the offense didn't do that.. If different plays
aren't ran, then we will see the same ole stuff, and your right, it
will be a long season.
Did you see the one stat that showed NO tight end caught a TD last
year? I remember 2 that Kay dropped in the endzone, and in both
cases it was a go ahead score. Paul Green was cut last week. He was
better than the other back-up slug they had.
Hopefully this Johnson guy will work out, 'cause we know that old
Clarence will be arrested before seasons end.
Ti
|
36.178 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:22 | 5 |
| Read in the paper that some FB named Reggie Rivers (?) or something
like that has been moving his way up the Donk depth chart to #2
behind Perryman, surpassing Bratton and Sewell.
Carlos
|
36.179 | TRADE RUMORS | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:25 | 6 |
| Seems that Denver is shopping around Mel Bratton he is 4th on the FB depth chart
Vance Johnson and Ricky Natteil are also being shopped around.
RThe only player Denver is getting calls on is Bobby Humphrey.
|
36.180 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:34 | 3 |
|
Hope they're looking for some defensive help, cause it shore would
be a shame to let the Chiefs and the Raiders go at it all alone...
|
36.181 | Denver misses Perry ON the field | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:44 | 11 |
| If Juriga's back doesn't get better soon, the position they'll need
help at most is left tackle. Giants' scouts were at the HOF game
checking out some Bronco talent in case Denver is interested in acquiring
a tackle from them.
RE Rivers
He is one of the biggest surprises of camp, if not the biggest. He's a
first-year free agent from SW Texas State. I don't think there's room
for him on the roster though, with all the backs Denver has.
Joe
|
36.182 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Aug 01 1991 20:47 | 26 |
| This is the 1st I have heard of Rivers. Of course I haven't been
into the Broncos scene as much as others. If this Rivers guy is
proving to be a great talet, then get rid of Bratton. Bratton did
slow down towards the end of last season, regardless of the W/L record.
Bratton seems to be going down the same road as Jeff Alexander did 2
years ago. Alexander started out great, then ended up having drinking
problems as well as gaining weight.
I guess Reeves is saying that if Humphrie doesn't get to camp, that
they might consider a trade. I think Denver would be losing a great RB
if this happened. It's been since Floyd Little and Armstrong days that
Denver hasn't had a "real" RB. Sure Winder ran for alot of yards, but
he was slow and didn't have the moves.
I don't think they should trade Bobby to get an OT. The OT might not
work out, unless its a Chris Hinton or Jumbo Elliot type.
It sounds like the LB Mills might win a starting job. He seems to be
immpressing the staff.
Carlos, do you really think the Faiders are going to have as good a
year as they did last year? Don't kid yourself;^^
Tim
|
36.183 | tough to play "D" from behind bars... | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Frankie & Dinz-Love Story 2 1/2 | Fri Aug 02 1991 08:49 | 15 |
|
>> RThe only player Denver is getting calls on is Bobby Humphrey.
not true Jeff, why I called just the other day to ask them if they
were still pay Mr. Ed 2 million...
I needed a laugh.....
you better take him early cause if you don't I will he ought to rack
up BIG BIG numbers against all them 5th place teams...
course his defesne will give up more...
mike
|
36.184 | Tonight HORSE BOWL ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Fri Aug 02 1991 11:24 | 7 |
| Denver takes on Indianapolis tonight Expect Dickerson to get about 50 yds in
the first quarter then the stiffs will fill in for the rest of the game.
I expect to see Johnson, Nattiel and Bratton to get some time. Shawn Moore
will play most of the second half.
BORING !!!
|
36.185 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:17 | 7 |
|
Actually Jeff, I'm very interested to see how McCloughan
and VanderPoel (sp?) do for the Colts. They are ex CU
Buffs BTW. But you knew that. Hail, even Kwak knew
that. Just ask 'Saw.
Claybone
|
36.186 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Aug 02 1991 13:07 | 3 |
| Where's Jill 'the excited'? She should be getting wound up for
another Donk season.
Denny
|
36.187 | | GENRAL::WADE | BetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6! | Fri Aug 02 1991 13:31 | 5 |
|
Wait'll they win a couple in a row Denny. I'm
a great straight man eh?
Claybone ;^)
|
36.188 | The absolute best season | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:13 | 8 |
| The Donks could win 8 games this year if they go 4-4 in the division I would
be very impressed.
I expect Elway to get hurt on a blind side sack. Humphrey will show then blow
out a knee 4 games into the season. Atwater will hold out for the gold plating
off the Denver Capital dome... "He does deserve it".
Jeff
|
36.189 | Horse bowl...Thats a good one Jeff;6 | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:45 | 13 |
| I'm not sure if I will be in town to watch this one. Hopefully
Reeves will play rookies since we already know what the vets can do.
Let the rookies play the whole game, that way by game 3 or 4 of
preseason, they should be more "primed" to show their real talents.
I beleive its hard for these 1st year (on the squad) guys to show
all.
Where is Jack and Jill?
Tim
P.S. Smile Cacti.....
|
36.190 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:53 | 11 |
| Well I did indeed watch most of the game Friday. 1st string O
looked "normal". I thought that the defense looked fairly good. Its
hard to look bad when the other teams ball carrier can't hold onto the
ball.
I think Lang will work out as long as he doesn't get to greedy to
pick off passes.
I still like Shawn Moore.....
Tim
|
36.192 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:15 | 20 |
| Defense did look pretty good Friday night, especially Fletcher and
Brooks. Whether it's Croel, Mills, or Lucas as the LOLB, this should
be one of the league's best set of 'backers....Kenny Walker was getting
a little heat on the QB....Gaston Green showed his speed on that TD run,
and he might have had a couple more long runs but lost his footing.
Shawn Moore looked real good - Hegarty's as good as gone....If Sharpe is
going to stay at H-Back, he's going to have to improve his
blocking....Reggie Johnson had a bad groin pull in the game, and is
expected to miss the rest of preseason. :(
Atwater was back in camp yesterday and will start against the Niners.
Of the 3 holdouts, he was missed the most. I also heard that Croel may
be signed before the end of the week.
Kubiak may see some action on Wednesday night.
Right now, it's looking like Bratton won't make the team.
Joe
|
36.193 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:16 | 4 |
| Atwater signed this weekend, the Donks just have Humphrey and Croel
left to sign.
Carlos
|
36.194 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:21 | 13 |
| Atwater will have $34,500 in fines to pay. Now was it worth it?
Unless not practicing for 2+weeks is worth that kinda cash.
We will see about Humphrey. If he comes back, and Green as backup,
well they would compliment each other well.
I think the FB is still up in they air. Rivers didn't seem to do
much, that I saw anyway.
I agree that the linebacking should be better this year than in the
past ??? years......
Tim
|
36.195 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 05 1991 17:16 | 19 |
| > Atwater will have $34,500 in fines to pay. Now was it worth it?
> Unless not practicing for 2+weeks is worth that kinda cash.
FWIW Tim, do ya really think Steve will end up paying that fine? I would
bet it will either be waived or tacked onto his salary as part of the
deal in him returning to camp. 34K is nothing to NFL franchises who
are used to paying $1 mil for something like a signing bonus.
Back on the field, Nattiel was returning punts the other night. What
Reeves is trying to do here is get someone to return punts who will
also contribute to the team in other areas. Bottom line: could spell
the end for Kevin Clark. BTW, I thought Nattiel did a pretty good
returning punts, except for that one he fumbled while trying to make a
sliding catch - he never should have touched that one.
Joe
|
36.196 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Aug 06 1991 14:14 | 19 |
| Atwaters 34k problem will be put towards his insurance policy. So
yeh, he doesn't pay it. Bowlen gave into that request, but didn't on
the salary bump.
Reeves is probably trying Nattiel at returns 'cause he doesn't want
to cut all the talent that he has at recieving, IMO. I thought Kevin
Clark did a great job of returning kicks last year, once he was brought
in. If I remember correctly, he led the AFC in yards/return at one
point, then ended up getting hurt. He was/is fun to watch. He isn't
that great of a nickel back though...
Some no name was cut yesterday. He was from Puerto Rico (?) and
never played college ball. REeves says he had alot of talent and hopes
this guy finds a job in Canada or WLAF.
I hope these other 2 guys get to camp so the coaches won't have any
doubts has to starters.
Tim
|
36.197 | San Fran 24, Denver 6 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:56 | 24 |
| It doesn't seem like anybody wants to talk about it, but there was a
game last night. The 1st-team offense looked terrible, a combination
of poor run-blocking, lack of production from Green (6 carries for 10
yards), Elway not being sharp, and probably most of all numerous drops
by receivers. The bad news that means something though is all the
injuries: Vance sprained a knee, Fletcher spained an ankle, Sharpe
got a concussion, Scott Curtis sprained an ankle, and Kip Corrington
sprained an ankle. The good news is that only Vance's injury is
serious - he may miss a few weeks.
1st-team defense looked pretty good, although the Niners hurt
themselves quite a bit with holding penalties. Brooks played a great
game and Warren Powers also looked pretty good. Rookie Kenny Walker
secured himself a spot on the roster with 2 sacks and a forced fumble.
Both Elway and Kubiak were calling their own plays, something Reeves
said may last into the regular season.
4th-round pick Derek Russell also looked pretty good.
Denver doesn't play again until a week from Monday against Miami.
Joe
|
36.198 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Thu Aug 08 1991 18:17 | 6 |
| You have to be kidding me Joe. I though Russell (WR - #5) looked
terrible. Did he have a catch? I saw him drop a thousand balls.
Other than that, I pretty much agree with you.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.199 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 08 1991 18:38 | 6 |
| Glenn,
Russell had 3 catches and looked good returning kickoffs. Yea he had
some drops, but who didn't last night.
Joe
|
36.200 | The game just plain Stunk up Candlestick. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen "RSS" | Fri Aug 09 1991 14:19 | 11 |
| Getting beat 24-6 didn't bother me as mush as Denver Played 1st team offense
and Defense in the first half and the 9'ers played the first team for a single
series and the starting QB didn't even play.
At the half the score was 10-3shoulda been 13-3 S.F was relaxed and played
with the belief that this is a preseason scrimage game. Denver was playing
for "revenge of 55-10" they lookedbad they couldn't execute they played soft
by trying not to give up the big play.
As a Bronco fan I wasn't disappointed but real early this year I know that the
class of the NFL is still in the NFC.
Jeff
|
36.201 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Aug 09 1991 15:59 | 15 |
| It was a very bad game for the offense as a whole. Denver needs to
learn how to minimize that 5 yard pass. 9'rs Beat them consistently
with this.
You have to admire the man-man coverage on the 9'rs defense. Even
when a donk reciever would catch the ball, there was always a def back
there to put a hit on them. Maybe Wymon should take lessons.
The Miami game should be interesting. Marino will eat there lunch if
things don't get better.
Miami's D isn't that great, so look for Denver to find the endzone,
which is something they seem to have problems with.
Tim
|
36.202 | Tastes great....Less filling! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Fri Aug 09 1991 17:36 | 15 |
| >...the class of the NFL is still in the NFC.
I disagree, I think there is both classy and sad-dog teams in both
conferences. Certainly you can not say that the Falcons or the Bucs
are classy teams 'tho they're in the NFC, and likewise I don't think
you'd consider teams like KC, Buffalo, Houston, and such to be without
class. Maybe you mean that the best in the NFC is better than the
best in the AFC, but even that don't wash when you consider how
teams like the Raiders, Dolphins and Steelers did -vs- the NFC in
the last twenty years, or even better, just during the last ten
years when the NFC was supposed to be superior. Maybe I'm being
to critical here, but I for one, don't think that the class of the
NFL is in the NFC ....only.
Carlos
|
36.203 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Aug 12 1991 10:10 | 6 |
| I think that the statement means that the only really outstanding
teams today are in the NFC. If so, I believe it. The only really
outstanding teams in the last 5 years have been in the NFC. Despite
the fact that LA and Miami had some excellent teams in the first
half of the 80's, there have been no really oustanding teams in the
AFC in the last 5 years.
|
36.204 | Hey, where's the bucks ?!? | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Mon Aug 12 1991 10:28 | 10 |
| Denver is gonna have to spend some $$$ on their better players if
they expect them stay around--Humphrey in particular. He's making
$300,000/year while Barry Sanders is getting ready to sign for
$2M/year. Humphrey's stats last year were close to Sanders, too.
Of course if Humphrey was pulling in $2M/year then Elway's feelings
would be hurt, so they'd have to throw another Million/year to him.
Look for countless RBs holding out before next season, BTW.
Cowboy
|
36.205 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 12 1991 14:33 | 18 |
| Some of the trade rumors involving Humphrey:
-Humphrey to SF for a package including some offensive lineman who can
play any position on the line but is best suited at guard. Not what
Denver needs.
-Humphrey to SF for NT Michael Carter and a #1 draft pick.
-Humphrey to Tampa for rookie tackle Charles McRae. They said on the
news last night that Tampa turned this offer down.
If the Broncos are seriously interested in trading Humphrey, they want to
get a starter and a 1st-round pick.
Croel was signed Friday.
Joe
|
36.206 | Who knows, but | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Aug 12 1991 16:10 | 12 |
| Denver would be dumb to try and get Mcrae anyway. He is unsigned, so
what is the difference between him and Humphrey?
Humphrey will show. He can't afford the fines for all season, and he
also knows that he is the starter when he returns. Green is ok, but
he is to inconsistant to have a 1,000 yard season. Plus if he was
starter and got hurt, who would back him up? I think Green would
be/is a good backup for Bobby.
The other guys in camp aren't at the "pro" level yet, IMO.
Tim
|
36.207 | They better get an all-pro for him | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Aug 12 1991 17:11 | 7 |
|
I can't believe those idjits are considering trading BH.
The Donks finally get a premier RB and two years later
they wanna get rid of him cuz he wants a pay raise (that
he deserves IMHO). Sheesh.........
Claybone
|
36.208 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Aug 13 1991 20:15 | 7 |
| I had a Faider fan come and tell me that he had heard Vance has been
traded. Does anyone have knowledge of this?
I think that would be a good move as long as they get OL or DL help.
Other than that, forget it!
Tim
|
36.209 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Way to go John Daly | Tue Aug 13 1991 21:19 | 8 |
|
I thought that Vancine was going to jail????
oh poor Johnny poor Johnny but atleast he's got his first excuse...
;^)
mike
|
36.210 | Broncos are in tougher division than Pitt | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Aug 14 1991 12:37 | 6 |
| Excuse for what? With Vance out until after the Sep.1st opener,
then this should give Russel a chance to show something.
Elway doesn't make excuses, if he plays bad, he will say so.
Besides, he doesn't have to have Mommy there to comfort him when he
loses, unlike Boobsy....A pure momma's BOY! ;^^
|
36.211 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Wed Aug 14 1991 14:16 | 15 |
| >Elway doesn't make excuses,
He doesn't need to, what with all the excuses you Donk fans make for
him....:-)
>...if he plays bad, he will say so.
You make him sound like a combination of John Wayne, Abe Lincoln,
and George Washington all in one. Truth is tho, if Elway isn't the
biggest whining, sniveling, crybaby, 'momma's boy' QB in the league,
I don't know who is. Now if you wanna talk about manly QB's, take
Jay Schroeder........why he's even got Geo. Washington's receding
hairline ......:-)
Carlos
|
36.212 | All this talk, its getting close to real games | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Aug 15 1991 13:09 | 8 |
| Shroeder also has washington's teeth...Biffs are real...real big.
Carlos, you know Elway is god compared to your Qb. Speaking of
crying, didn't shroeder scream until the Redskins finally dumped him?
WE will see how they fair this year.
Tim
|
36.213 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Fri Aug 16 1991 16:46 | 9 |
| The Donks play against the Dolphins this Monday night. Should be
a pretty good game even if it's only pre-season. I think these last
two pre-season games will be good indicators of what we can expect
from most teams come the first game of the regular season. I also
think the Dolphins are gonna have a good year this year (although
I wasn't expecting Smith to get hurt), and if the Raiders don't
make it to the big dance then the Dolphins will. JMHO
Carlos
|
36.214 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Aug 16 1991 18:29 | 10 |
|
Carlos,
I doubt this game will be a good indicator. Miami has
something like 9 holdouts (7 of whom are starters). They
also have ~3 starters out due to injury. Now, if Denver
were to lose this game big time, you just might have an
indicator......
Claybone
|
36.215 | Marino is going to be rich! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Aug 20 1991 16:14 | 13 |
| Denver finally found the endzone last night. The 1st qtr was
terrible on the offensive side, but then it was turned around.
I would have liked to see Shawn Moore play instead of Kubiak.
I think the Denver linebackers are looking great. The DL still needs
a impact player. Bench Wymon Henderson. He is a slug! I think Li lo
Lang can do better than this toast of a player.
Elway looked normal. Humphrey is needed. Hamilton had 4 penalties,
and Dave Widell had 2. 4 of the six were for early starts.
Tim
|
36.216 | | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Tue Aug 20 1991 17:04 | 4 |
| Anyone count the number of sacks in that game? I've never seen
Marino hit the turf that much!
Cowboy
|
36.217 | Denver 21, Miami 13 | BSS::JCOTANCH | Larry, Curly, and Modell | Tue Aug 20 1991 17:32 | 39 |
| RE: Cowboy
I think Denver only got 1 sack on Marino, but they were pressuring him
all night. That's the thing about Marino: he holds onto the ball and
isn't afraid to be hit after he releases the ball, which is much of the
reason for his incredibly low number of sacks over the years. Not to
take anything away from Miami's offensive line, mind you.
RE: Tim
Yes, I also feel the 'backers are looking great, especially Brooks.
Croel didn't have alot of tackles but seemed to always be around the
action or pressuring Marino.
Elsewhere, a good performance as a whole, although Miami is without
some key players due to holdouts and injuries. I also agree with you
Tim that they need Humphrey. The running game was okay last night, and
Lewis undoubtedly locked up his spot on the final roster. I'm still
worried about the offensive line - Hamilton either needs to come around
or they need to acquire a left tackle pronto. Defense continues to
play very well and with alot of intensity.
Other notes:
Russell dropped a couple key passes, one of which may have gone the
distance. He should still make the team though.
I'm not convinced Reggie Rivers will make this team, but he will
probably survive today's cuts.
The defense appears to be back to their aggressive style of 2 years
ago.
Veterans who may be in trouble IMO are Andre Townsend, Melvin Bratton,
Chris Verhulst, Blake Ezor, Rick Dennison, and maybe even Steve Sewell.
Kevin Clark remains a big question. Does Denver keep a guy who
contributes very little in the defensive backfield but may be the best
return man they have?
Joe
|
36.218 | ahh... ready for the 1991 season now! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Aug 20 1991 17:49 | 2 |
|
Have the Donks ever won an NFL Championship...?
|
36.219 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:04 | 8 |
|
No, but our record in AFC champeenship games is perfect
wouldn't YOU say? :-)
Oh, and btw, our resident fascist(sp?) moderator has set
up a note where we can carry on so to speak. Thanks Mac! ;^)
Claybone
|
36.220 | | FMCSSE::BROWN | Can you Bupp the Pupp? | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:07 | 8 |
|
re-2
Icepork!!
Have the Brownspots ever beaten the Donkey's in a AFC champeenship?
Cadzilla
|
36.221 | alright! Iceman's back! | HAVASU::HEISER | God knows Bo | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:25 | 1 |
|
|
36.222 | Humphrey a Bronco? | ROULET::LAFOUNTAINE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 00:56 | 5 |
| Humphrey seems to be up on the block. USA Today said that the Falcons
had spoke with Reeves and Reeves was qouted on this. The only catch was
that Dan said they didn't offer enough. How is the rumor mill on the
49ers picking him up?
The Rookie
|
36.223 | only the donkeys...
| CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 09:37 | 10 |
|
Here's a guy who comes in gains 2300+ yards, catches and blocks and the
Donks don't have a place for him? I guess Smellway can't stand to share
the spotlight and went crying to Blowland (tm). They finally get a running
game and now they're going to give it away....
For the rest of the league's sake I hope if they do trade him they atleast
don't send him to the Niners...
mike
|
36.224 | Broncos cut to 60 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 21 1991 10:57 | 25 |
| Waived:
Scott Beavers, G
Matt McCall, T
Melvin Bratton, FB
Blake Ezor, TB
Tony Alford, TB
Tim Stallworth, WR
Curtis Mayfield, WR
Ernest Priester, WR
Norris Hanes, WR
Chris Verhulst, TE
Pat Hegarty, QB
Rick Dennison, LB
Rollin Putzier, NT
Doug Jacobs, DE
Fred Foggie, CB
Tracy Bennett, K
Jim Juriga was placed on IR and is out for the season. Alphonso
Carreker was placed on the physically unable to perform list and can be
activated after six games.
Joe
|
36.225 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 11:01 | 13 |
|
I agree Mikey (except for the part about Godway crying to
Blowin(tm)). However, there is a little more to the story.
The Donks have a policy about not renegotiating a contract
that has more than a year left (Humphrey's has two). They
have never bent on this rule and I kinda doubt they will
for him. Look for BH to either come to camp with a lil'
promise whispered in his ear for a new contract before
next season (ala Steve Atwater) or to sit the whole year.
We'll see how things go when he starts missing paychecks......
Claybone
|
36.226 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 13:38 | 8 |
|
In this day and age of a contract ain't worth the ink it's printed on it's
a stupid rule. But hey Pat famous for being stupid.....
and you're wrong about Smellway...look at his track record he's been a cryer
since day 1.........
mike
|
36.227 | you got it all wrong | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 13:50 | 9 |
|
Mikey,
I think you're confused by BBJ's facial expressions. You see,
if you combine his big teefus with the squint (due to him
looking at the Donk sideline and thus into the sun), it appears
he's crying. :^) Glad to be able to help........
Claybone
|
36.228 | At least Biffs worth the money he's paid | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Aug 21 1991 14:26 | 12 |
| Glad to see Hagerty gone. It seems that the drafties are being held
onto, until next week anyway.
Mike, quit squealling will ya? At least the broncos have a QB.
Pitt is still searching for one. Maybe they should get Shroeder;^ Of
course the squealer games wouldn't be the same without boobsie's mom
plastered on the screen.
Maybe her and uncle Al have rights to showing there faces 20 times
during a game. I would hate to watch a faider vs squealer game;^
Tim
|
36.229 | reality check for donko fans | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 14:39 | 23 |
|
Here's the write up and rankings in my official fantasy football special
magazine:
#9 Bubby Brister: The Steelers finally started to get their offense to click
last year and Bubby was the main beneficiary. The fifth year pro had his
finest NFL season, throwing for 2,725 yards and 20 touchdowns. In the two
previous years, Brister had thrown just 20 TD's while rushing for six. Last
year he stayed in the pocket more and didn't rush for any td's. Brister is
maturing as a quarterback, which is good news for the Steelers and good news
for fantasy owners. Brister should again approach his 20 td season again
this year.
#18 John Elway: Elway's number keep getting worse and worse. His 15 td's last
year were his lowest since 1983 and the fourth time in the last 5 years
they have dropped. Even though he rushed for 3 td's last year, Elway is
still a mediocre QB for fantasy owners. Elway has never thrown more than
22 td's in a season, and now with the sore are he reportly has now it's
highly unlikey that he will reach even that modest total in 1991....
so you tell me who has a QB and who doesn't please????
mike
|
36.230 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 21 1991 14:47 | 7 |
| The qualities that make a player in any sport attractive to a fantasy
owner are not necessarily the ones that make that player attractive to
the real teams in the sport he plays, and vice-versa. I wouldn't
necessarily consider Brister a better QB than Elway just because his
fantasy ratings are higher.
John
|
36.231 | still the most overrated/overpayed bum in the league | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 15:28 | 11 |
|
Sorry John but this is the Donk's note objectivety is not an admirable trait
in this note. While I concur that what makes a player attractive to a fantasy
owner and a real team are two different things the fact of the matter is that
Smellway is just plain bad and getting worst by the day while Brister is up
and coming....
Who would you rather have on the Pats if you were able to have either of these
two???
mike
|
36.232 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 21 1991 15:41 | 10 |
| I don't know which one I'd take since I don't really know enough about
either player. I can't measure players the way a coach does because I
don't have enough knowledge to do so. I've also often said that in
football individual stats are really a crock since the stats an
individual player racks up are mostly a function of how the team is
doing and not necessarily based on his own talents, hence, individual
stats in football in and of themselves are not an accurate gauge of a
player's value.
John
|
36.233 | some facts to help you choose | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:02 | 9 |
|
Brister likes women, beer, staying up late, chewing tabachey, fighting and
cussing.
Elway likes horses, crying, brie, being pampered and nestle crunchbars..
now who do you choose???
mike
|
36.234 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | Knows his way around a G string | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:10 | 5 |
| Easy, Elway.
At least he doesn't need his mommy in the stands.
Mark.
|
36.235 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Take me to Roslyn's Cafe Please | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:15 | 5 |
|
no he has his doggie wife there instead...
the only reason Bubby's mother is there cause he can't he chose which one
of his gazillion girlfriends to bring to the game...
|
36.236 | 8-) | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:17 | 10 |
|
Janet (to us adoring Godway fans) is the best looking
QB's wife in the NFL. How dare you call her a dog!
Yeah, I heard ole Bubble wanted to bring all his girlfriends
to a Steeler game.......but the local dog pound is closed
on Sundays.
Claybone
|
36.237 | STILL LIVING IN HELL - The Denver theme '91 | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Thu Aug 22 1991 09:39 | 4 |
|
Bring them to the Dawg Pound....plenty of bones to go around.
Dirty Dawg
|
36.238 | Cant Stand Montana but his wife is hot | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Aug 22 1991 12:32 | 5 |
| I seem to remember Joe Montana's wife looking pretty sharp, I say
she may rate up there at NFL QB's #1 Good Looking Wife, of course
I havent seen them all but JM definatly rates higher than Elway's.
MAB
|
36.239 | Still nursing! | CUJO::CRANE | The original BUDMAN | Thu Aug 22 1991 12:42 | 6 |
| I heard Booby's mother is in the stands because he is still being
breast fed! She is hoping to have him on solid food in the next 10-15
years and then she will tackle poddy training!
RC
|
36.240 | Elway had his best % complete last year! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:07 | 13 |
| re-1 Good one. Enough of that rathole, since Mike will always have
something laime to sling back.
The Broncs play Phoenix in Tempe tommorrow night. Phoenix is
undefeated in pre-season which I know doesn't count, but look at their
increasing talent, and I say it will be a typical Denver game. They
will make it close no matter who they play, not counting SBs.
This game should resemble a regular season game since teams are
trying to "fine tune" they're 1st stringers. They will probably play
through qtr.3.
Tim
|
36.241 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Aug 22 1991 17:06 | 6 |
| I know it was against a Patriots team that has a ton of holes to fill,
but the Cardinals looked very impressive Saturday night...should be a
good test for the Broncos.
py
|
36.242 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Aug 23 1991 09:08 | 4 |
| I heard the Cards qb could be out for the year. That means the Pats
have a 'chance' when they go back there later this season. Rosenbach
had a helluva game vs the Pats, but who doesn't!
Denny
|
36.243 | Go Broncos...whatta team | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:02 | 7 |
| Appearently Rosenbach messed up a ligament in his knee during
practice yesterday, so the Broncs have to play against they're #2 QB,
who ever he is.
What time does the game start? I know its on ch 21.
Tim
|
36.244 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:31 | 3 |
| Game doesn't start 'til 8:30 and Tom Tupa will be Phoenix's QB.
Joe
|
36.245 | Thankfully it doesn't count | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Aug 26 1991 12:05 | 16 |
| I guess I'll be 1st to say ouch. The Broncos got spanked in the
second half Friday night. Turnovers killed them.
The offense just didn't seem to get much going. Denvers rushing game
could be in trouble if the pre-season is a sign of how its going to be.
I didn't think the Defense sucked as bad as the score indicated.
When you turn the ball over inside your own 25 2x, then your in deep
stuff. Actually all 3 turnovers were in denvers end. Also, the
offense did alot of nothing, which means the defense was on the field
quite a bit, especially in the 1st half. It did actually get close to
even in the second half.
Get back in Bobby!!
Tim
|
36.246 | Get used to it, Timmibob! | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Mon Aug 26 1991 12:21 | 1 |
|
|
36.247 | This is true ??? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Mon Aug 26 1991 12:28 | 13 |
| FFL 12 round.
Robichaud - Marv Cook, TE, Patriots
Wardle - Reggie Rembert, WR, Bengals
Pfau - Roger Craig, RB, Raiders
Hernandez - Steve Young, QB, 49ers
Dore - Ickey Woods, RB, Bengals
Childs - John Elway, QB, Broncos <<<<<<<<< Mike CHILDS worships the DUKE>>>>>
Santos -
Riggen -
Maselli -
Polakowski -
|
36.248 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:03 | 15 |
| Bronco cuts:
Kevin Clark CB
Kip Corrington S x
Scott Curtis LB x
David Galloway DE
Don Gibson NT
Marcus Hopkins S x
Keith Jennings TE
Barry Johnson WR
Shawn Moore QB
Mark Murray LB
Brent Parkinson OT
Jim Szymanski DE
Andre Townsen NT x
|
36.249 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:06 | 4 |
|
The "x" in .248 indicates the player received an injury settlement.
Claybone
|
36.250 | More... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:15 | 6 |
| Denver is expected to put Vance and Crawford Ker in IR and reclaim
Clark and Gibson. Moore, Murray, Jennings, Barry Johnson and Hopkins
are all expected to be re-signed for the rookie developmental squad.
Joe
|
36.251 | Today will tell the rest of story | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:18 | 7 |
| I hope these guys make it thru waivers, especially Moore and Clark.
I don't know enough about the others.
Maybe Denver could get a decent tackle off waivers...Doug Smith was
cut by the rams. Denver could use a pro-bowl Center.
Tim
|
36.252 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:43 | 5 |
|
Ida know Tim. I think Kartz has been doing a good job
pro bowl or not.......
Claybone
|
36.253 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Aug 27 1991 18:42 | 13 |
| I kinda agree/disagree with ya Claybone. The reason is Denver has a
heck of a time running up the middle, which I know alot of teams do.
On the other hand, you are right, that he has usually done a good job
on the pass rush, and very rarely does he and Biff have a snapping
problem.
This guy from the RAms would be a good back-up or starter. We know
that Keith seems to get injured every year, and ends up sitting out
some games. I guess thats my real point.
Has anyone heard of the waivers and reclaims yet?
Tim
|
36.254 | Clearing waivers | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Aug 28 1991 10:31 | 9 |
| Denver did put Vance and Ker on IR.
Kevin Clark and Jim Szymanski were added to roster.
Shawn Moore, Barry Johnson, Mark Murray, and Don Gibson are on the
dev squad.
Tim
|
36.255 | Wake up Bronco fans, it starts for real this Sunday | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:36 | 16 |
| LG Sean Farrell is doubtful for the Cincy game and will be replaced by
Dave Widell. Kartz will start despite a badly sprained ankle.
I'm tired of hearing about the Humphrey situation.
I hope Alfred Williams does good in the NFL, but I just hope that
because he's playing 30 miles from his college campus he doesn't get
too fired up and put Elway out for the year.
Of course, I think Denver'll win on Sunday.
My prediction for the season: 11-5
Joe
|
36.256 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Aug 30 1991 16:41 | 3 |
| Sean Farrell has been 'doubtful' for about 3 years now. You guyz'll
be lucky to get half a dozen games outta him.
Denny
|
36.257 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Aug 30 1991 17:14 | 10 |
| I will wake up Sunday and get motivated, thats if I'm not camping or
something.
The Broncos should pull it out by 3-4 points.
I think a 9-7 season is more like it. They are to inconsistent to do
much better. Of course 9-7 should be good enough to get them into the
playoffs, but who knows.
Tim
|
36.258 | Is this a sign of things to come? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Sep 03 1991 11:48 | 10 |
| Whatta game!!!
Elway mixed the play calling very well, and the whole Bronco team
looked like they could do no wrong.
We will see if it is carried into LA this weekend. We know that the
FAiders defense is better than Cinncy's, even though you wouldn't have
thought that after the way they played against the oilers.
Tim
|
36.259 | Elway-bashers, you get the week off! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Sep 03 1991 12:26 | 26 |
| > -< Is this a sign of things to come? >-
Let's hope so!
Offense was near-perfect in the 1st half, only stalling on one drive
where Treadwell missed a short FG. That 3rd quarter had me worrying
back to last year, but when Cincy was about to get back within 7
Mecklenberg made the key play of the game sacking Boomer and causing
a fumble. And what a great way for Braxton to return, making the pick
and returning it for a TD that just about sealed the win. Croel and
Mecklenberg made that play though, getting in Boomer's face and causing
the bad throw.
Denver had a field goal blocked and nearly had some extra points
blocked. The O-line looked real good, but keep in mind Cincy's defensive
line isn't among the league's best.
I don't really expect a win this week in LA, but if they can pull it
off we're looking at a possible 4-0 start. If Denver can get out to a
4-2 start that should be considered great with the three tough road
games in there. The Cincy game was a must-win IMO.
That penalty after Elway's 1st TD was total crap.
Joe
|
36.260 | GO DONKS! | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 04 1991 00:41 | 17 |
| They had me worried there in the 3rd qtr. Cinci was in position to
make it a 28-21 game untill the fumble down deep. There were a couple
of blatant drops of Boomer's passes earlier that also hurt the Bengals
badly. Denver's secondary still looks like swiss cheese. Anybody that can
pick it apart will delight in some Bronco fondu. Before sunday, I
was saying 8-8 but I can safely fudge now with a 9-7.
How about them Raiders? Outscored something like 100 to 20 in their
past 2 games. What's going on with those guys? Everybody is saying
how mad they're going to be. Are they still claiming to be just a
good qb away from the bowl? Where's the defense? As always we can
throw out the stats on this one. Another FG will probably be the
difference and maybe in OT. An 0-2 start will have them talking
to themselves.
BoB
|
36.261 | Bronco Are Back And So Is Jack | QUASER::HUNTER | Bronco's #1 in Boomer's Book | Wed Sep 04 1991 16:06 | 10 |
| AAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
What a game !!!!! I knew that all Denver had to do was get away from
the Collie Boy calling a game plan that even a Clowns fan could
predict. The Donks will have a good season..... They should, they
do have a pretty weak schedule. (Boy, if Wardle could hear me say
that he'd never beleive it)
Big Game
|
36.262 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Sep 05 1991 16:00 | 13 |
| Donk tidbits from today's local rag:
Alphonso Carrecker will be back wk 7
Danny boy gives a big thumbs up for Al Davis being in the HoF.
BBJ needs 17 more yards passing to hit 25K.
Reeves is 9-10 against the Raiders as coach of the Broncos.
In those 19 games, only 15 points separate the scoring of
the two teams (LA 375 Donks 360).
Claybone
|
36.263 | Expect a big emotional letdown Sunday ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Fri Sep 06 1991 12:42 | 8 |
| Every time Denver wins big or pulls a upset over a team that is favored
the week afterwards is spent gloating and floating over what a good team Denver
is and not concentrating on the weaknesses. Denver's O-line had lasted Sunday
off, Expect a overconfident Offensive line that gets blown off the ball for the
first half. I expect Denver's D to turn in a second strong performance. The
key is to get to Schroeder early and often.
Jeff
|
36.264 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Sep 06 1991 17:16 | 4 |
| I agree with the o-line bit Jeff. It should be a classic
Donk/faider game regardless.
Tim
|
36.265 | Notice it didn't take me 5 days to get in here | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go IU Hoosiers | Mon Sep 09 1991 10:29 | 32 |
| Well, Denver had a chance to go to LA and start the Faids off to nice
0-2 start and further disturb their confidence. And with KC's loss,
take an early lead in a division that promises to be a dogfight. But
no. They choke instead.
This game was as ugly as last year's opener in LA. The offensive line
played terrible. 33 yards net rushing and 5 sacks, 'nuf said. The
defense played pretty good, although the key point in the game was
where they let LA take the 2nd half kickoff and march downfield while
consuming over 9 minutes off the clock. The worst part of that drive
was that they had LA and long yardage situations and let them off the
hook. 2nd and 20 from LA's own 10. 3rd and 8 or 9 up around the 35.
A 1st and 15 a little later. You gotta stop teams in 3rd and long,
folks. They were putting a lot of pressure on Schrader early, but
decided to back off or stop blitzing or something in the 2nd half. I
think they should be blitzing Schrader nearly every play. He's the type
of QB that fumbles and gets rattled if you put enough pressure on him.
Schrader's not a great QB,.but if you give him the time, he will pick you
apart (as will most any NFL QB if he's given the time to sit in the pocket
and eat his lunch).
Other tidbits:
Denver had some missed opportunities on offense in the 1st half where
they had to settle for 3. They also didn't recover fummbles by Craig
and Schrader that may have turned it around. This game showed how
important Clark is returning kickoffs and punts.
I find it mandatory that Denver win their next 2 games, both of which
are at home and against teams they should beat.
Joe
|
36.266 | HACK, HACK, HACK | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:08 | 2 |
|
|
36.267 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 09 1991 12:11 | 7 |
|
You can chalk the Raider win up to their defensive line. They
completely dominated Denver's O-line. Elway was lucky to be
sacked *only* 5 times. He was running for his life on practically
every other passing play.
Claybone
|
36.268 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Sep 09 1991 14:45 | 12 |
| I thought denvers def line played bad in the second half. Like Joe
said, keep the pressure on the QB, and he will choke.
All in all, it was a typical Bronco/faider game. It won't be any
different come nov. 10th. These kind of games I like, because they
are always close and it seems to come down to the final seconds before
its decided. Almost got the onsides kick. That would have been
interesting.....
Next week is Seattle, and expect another classic rival game.
Tim
|
36.269 | Denver in week 2 = Choke !!! Faiders Stink !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bronco's #1 in Boomer's Book | Wed Sep 11 1991 10:23 | 11 |
|
Well, The Damn Donks stepped on it once again... I surely can't live
through another Jeckel and Hyde season. I say fire Reeves, Bench Elway
and pay Bobby H. what ever he wants to come play ball. The Donks
could be in for a long long long season if they lose next week to the
Seachickens...... ;^)
Big Game
P.S. The Donks are still 3,000,000,000 time better than the Clevescum
Clowns have ever been !!!!!
|
36.270 | Any left tackles for hire? | WEPUBS::DCHAVEZ | Dale - CXN2 Colorado Springs | Wed Sep 11 1991 11:43 | 9 |
|
Let's face it. Until the Broncos invest heavily (no pun intended) in a
good left tackle, they will continue to play inconsistent through the
year. In fact, I look for John Elway to get seriously hurt this year
for the first time, due to a missed block by the left tackle. The left
tackle has got to protect the (right-hand) quarterback's blind side,
and I don't see anyone that has done that yet.
Dale
|
36.271 | you must be sweaten' | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Wed Sep 11 1991 13:36 | 19 |
|
Hey Big Lame,
Man you are really trying to get into it, arn't you?
Your Donkies are so much better arn't they.....thats why they are
undefeated...right? Lets see some stats here. Lets see why they are
just so much better.
Your screw ball team will be in the Dawg Pound this year again and
the outcome will remain the same. Bernie is better than that donky
face guy with the teeth that grow out of his nose. Come on man, lets
see the stats that support your stinking attitude.
Donky face's days are numbered. I agree with Dale.
Go eat a bone. Here I have one for you right here. A nice big
one.
Grrrrrrrrr!
|
36.272 | | CAM::WAY | Irene Ryan is SUCH a babe! | Wed Sep 11 1991 13:52 | 12 |
| Yup.
There's ol Hal, "strutting his chest" to quote ACC. His team lost
to Dallas (an unproven commodity at best) and beat the worst team
in the NFL. And he's all beatin' up on everyone else.
Wait and see what happens. In a few weeks, Hal Houdini will disappear
until next preseason....
Hey Hal, how're the Indians doing????
'Saw
|
36.273 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Michigan *will* prevail | Wed Sep 11 1991 14:05 | 11 |
| > Your screw ball team will be in the Dawg Pound this year again and
> the outcome will remain the same.
Yea, the it'll be the same outcome as all those AFC Championship games.
You will be long gone from notes by then (Dec. 8th) when your dawgs
are about 4-9.
Joe
|
36.274 | Does Hal = Peewee? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Sep 11 1991 19:41 | 17 |
| Way to go Cacti, Hal is riled up, and he will yap until they lose to
a team with a winning record. Actually, who knows, the stains might
even lose to the kitty cats this weekend....
As to benching Elway, c'mon, that won't happen. I think the lines
lost this last game. Reeves and Elway didn't do it. Sure Elway
overthru Nattiel on the 1 yard line, but he was being chased.
If it was Reeves, then blame him for only having 3 d-linemen in the
game. The announcers kept saying the Broncs only had 4 healthy
linemen, so maybe he should get another on the squad, and maybe put a
RB on practice team.
I'm wondering how good the Defense would do in a 4-3 instead of 3-4?
Tim
|
36.275 | you want some stats??? | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:26 | 19 |
|
You want some stats???
Here is one:
#1 QB after week 2 = Kelly
don't ask me how he gets rated 1st with 3 INT'S
#2 QB after week 2 = BERNIE KOSAR OF THE CLEVELAND BROWNS
with a rating of 113.5
and where is horse face???????
No, I won't be gone either......I'll be sure to be here
just to give you crap and make you eat crow after the Browns/Dongs
game.
Dirty Dawg
|
36.276 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:56 | 6 |
| QB rating is a function of 4 things - completion percentage, average
gain per completion, TD percentage and Int percentage. Kelly has
thrown a lot of long passes and a lot of TD passes, so those figures
could very easily balance out the 3 interceptions.
John
|
36.277 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:57 | 8 |
| > #1 QB after week 2 = Kelly
> don't ask me how he gets rated 1st with 3 INT'S
Eight TD passes for starters, which gives Kelly an 8 to 3 TD pass to INT
ratio. I'll take that from my QB any day.
py
|
36.278 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Sep 12 1991 09:57 | 6 |
| Oh, and QB rating is like batting average. It takes a lot of games for
the true rating to be known. With such a small number of games early
in the season, just like with batting averages, QB ratings tend to be
either abnormally high or abnormally low.
John
|
36.279 | Bernie maybe not quite that good.... | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:58 | 19 |
| > Oh, and QB rating is like batting average. It takes a lot of games for
> the true rating to be known. With such a small number of games early
> in the season, just like with batting averages, QB ratings tend to be
> either abnormally high or abnormally low.
> John
> #2 QB after week 2 = BERNIE KOSAR OF THE CLEVELAND BROWNS
> with a rating of 113.5
This is obviously an abmormally high rating.
But then, its still not that bad for a QB that scrambles in highheels.
Cowboy
|
36.280 | It's only my opinion | QUASER::HUNTER | Bronco's #1 in Boomer's Book | Thu Sep 12 1991 19:42 | 11 |
| Cowboy...
You beat me to it. I'm quite sure that Bernie will finish in the to 5
to 8 in QB ratings this season, he always does. The only problem for
the Clowns will be that they'll finish last in their Division, last in
the AFC and darn close to the bottom in the league..... Hal, You
outta know by now that I'm not a stats man.... football is purely
emotional for me. BTW John Hendry, Where is John-Boy on the QB rating
list ???
Big Game
|
36.281 | The Cleveland Indians could beat the Patriots | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Fri Sep 13 1991 09:14 | 5 |
|
Big Game,
He is rated below Bernie. 3rd and about 8th in the NFL.
Dirty Dawg
|
36.282 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Michigan *will* prevail | Fri Sep 13 1991 11:40 | 10 |
| There will be 3 changes in Denver's lineup this Sunday, 2 due to injury
and 1 due to performance. Jeff Davidson will replace Darrell Hamilton
at LT because Hamilton hasn't been cuttin' it. Nattiel will return
punts because Clarks isn't ready to go yet. Michael Brooks will miss a
game or two and be replaced by rookie Keith Traylor.
If Denver is going to contend for the AFC West this Sunday's game
against Seattle is a must win.
Joe
|
36.283 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Sep 13 1991 16:01 | 6 |
| Clark isn't ready yet? Nattiel has proved that he is scared when
people are running at him on returns, so maybe Le Lo lang?
Denver should get 4-5 sacks this game, and maybe 2-3 ints....
Tim
|
36.284 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Sep 16 1991 09:53 | 5 |
| Going into this week, Kelly has a completion pct in the seventies, had
8 TDs and an average per attempt of over 9 yards. That more than
balanced out the 3 interceptions.
John
|
36.285 | Elway 19 of 32 for 252 and no ints! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Sep 16 1991 10:22 | 20 |
| Well this game was a typical "Broncos try to find way to lose" game.
For the most part, the game was boring. The Broncos about lost this
game. For some reason, the Broncos went to the prevent defense on
Seachickens last drive. Yes there were finally 4 linemen on this
series, but no blitzing when it was needed?
The offense studdured (sp?) again. Why can't they get that piece of
leather in the endzone? The field goals are better than nothing, but
TDs are a must if they are going to compete against the better teams.
Don't ever say Denver gets they're way all the time. Look at the 1st
fumble of John L. He lost it, but the play wasn't reveiwed. At least
the refs reviewed the Atwater recovery and overturned that one.
The ball was greased yesterday.....
Next week, the winless Chargers, who need a kicker;^
Tim
|
36.286 | 16-10 dumb game | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Mon Sep 16 1991 19:21 | 9 |
| Seems that Dan Reeves and John Elway completely forgot the running
game in the second half. Greg lewis didn't get a single carry in the
game. Perryman proved why he is only a plan B player. He can't
catch the ball.
Denver's secondary laid some hits on the Seahawks Sunday. The entire
pass defense looked strong, and Croel put a hit on Kemp that made his
dad winch in pain.
Jeff
|
36.287 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Michigan *did* prevail | Tue Sep 17 1991 10:44 | 36 |
| > For some reason, the Broncos went to the prevent defense on
> Seachickens last drive. Yes there were finally 4 linemen on this
> series, but no blitzing when it was needed?
That was my biggest gripe, not just on the last drive but in the whole
4th quarter. They had Kemp running scared in the 3rd quarter, and when
a team's behind 16-0 or 16-3 in the 4th quarter they have to pass the
ball. Didn't we talk about this last week?
The offense also didn't help in the 4th, not even getting a first down
in that quarter. I don't really think it was play-calling, mostly poor
execution and Seattle's gambling defense paying off. Green entered the
4th with something 21 carries for 96 yards and ended the game with 25
carries for 92 yards. 5 of Denver's last 6 offensive plays were
passes.
For the first 3 quarters Denver looked good but not great. Offense
moved the ball fairly well but had to settle for FG's 3 times,
including being stopped inside the Seattle 1-yard line. Seattle moved
the ball well on their first 2 drives, but didn't do much after that
until the 4th quarter.
Dennis has been laying some hits this season....Mike Horan is quietly
off to a poor start punting the ball.
> Next week, the winless Chargers,
They better win this one. They *should* be able to keep Friesz (sp?)
and co. out of the end zone. Kind of an interesting note that 2 teams
from San Diego will be in Colo. this weekend; San Diego State will be in
CS Saturday to take on Air Force and the Chargers will be in Denver on
Sunday.
Joe
|
36.288 | Will Denver be looking for another RB now? | FTMUDG::REED | OKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTER | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:03 | 9 |
| It sounds like Bobby Humphrey may be traded this week, probably to
the 49ers. This whole thing was stupid--on both sides, IMO. Denver
shouldn't have been so hard-nosed since they need his running ability
and BH shouldn't have thought he was so valuable. True, he's probably
worth more than Denvers paying him but he should have waited until
he was in camp and talked.
Cowboy
|
36.289 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Sep 17 1991 12:48 | 16 |
| Bobby hasn't been traded yet. Reeves wants alot for him, and no
team is willing to pay the price.
Appearently Bobby came back to Denver and packed all his stuff up and
is gone, so the media says.
I still Denver needs him! Green has done ok, but he seems to side
step to much, and Bobby always heads towards the endzone.
Tim Lucas is out forr at least 8 weeks....Broken leg. This gives
Croel the Start I guess.
Elway and Kosar are the only 2 AFC starting QBs without an int...
Tim
|
36.290 | Some serious HITS! | CUJO::CRANE | The original BUDMAN | Tue Sep 17 1991 17:43 | 12 |
| I was at the game four rows up and I will tell you that the defense was
laying some serious hits on Seattle. I agree with a few back that
Denver's offensive problems were more execution in nature, than play
calling. One difference I've seen between Green and Humphrey is Green
seems more likely to run into a closed hole where Bobby would go on his
own and try to make something happen. As much as I would love to see
Bobby in the backfield, I am glad Denver did not give in to him. My
$.02.
BUDMAN
|
36.291 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:05 | 8 |
|
I agree the play calling was good...........until the
last two series. Elway (I'm assuming) called 5 passes
out of the 6 plays. He only completed one. Thus, he
stopped the clock 4 times for the Seahawks. I estimate
he gave them a minimum of 2 extra minutes of clock.
Claybroon
|
36.292 | fire the collie | QUASER::HUNTER | Patriots Football... I Love It !!! | Thu Sep 19 1991 17:38 | 11 |
|
Well, The_Donks (TM) did it again..... I swear if you give them a
lead they sit on it no matter if 20 points or 1 point. I really have
started to hate watching second halfs..... I wish they'd play an
entire game for a change, that would be nice wouldn't it? I still
say fire the Collie Molester (sp?), Bench horse teeth and get the
greedy little SOB Humphries back in uniform before it's to late to
keep the Faiders from holding to first place all year.
Big Game
|
36.293 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:13 | 4 |
|
There's a big sale on clues down at the mall.......:^)
Claybone
|
36.294 | RE -1: Good one Clay, I'm rollin'!!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:16 | 1 |
|
|
36.295 | Seriously !!! ;^) | QUASER::HUNTER | Patriots Football... I Love It !!! | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:27 | 16 |
| HEY CLAY WAD.... POUND SAND UP YOUR A**......
If the Donks would have fired the Collie Master a few years back
they would have won those three Stupidbowls instead of banishing
us Donk fans to a life of living hell having to put up with all
the shit about their *GREAT* efforts in the "Big Game"..... I
still say fire The Collie, Bench John "Boy" Walton, and get that
greedy little SOB Booby HumpsTrees back on the grid where he
belongs. You may not agree now but you'll be calling for head(s)
later in the season, mark my words !
Don't get me wrong, I like the Donks(tm) but they'll never be
anything but an average team with Tom Landry Jr. running the team.
I think with the right coach Elway would be a much better QB than
he is today. I say give the team a chance Pat Bowlen..... Clean
your house and start at the top !!!
|
36.296 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Sep 19 1991 18:40 | 14 |
|
Nah Jack, trying to cut down (on the sand pounding that is).
Those three Super Bowls were decided in the NFC champeenship
games. The only one I even remotely thought they had a
chance in was the game against the Giants. The bottom line
in all three games is that the defense was a sieve. Small
and quick yeah, but not able to stop the bullies from the
NFC East and their smash-mouth football. If you remember,
Joe Collier had the reigns of the defense all to himself.
He's gone. And until they get a few stud muffins on the
D-line, they'll never win a Super Bowl IMHO.
Claybone
|
36.297 | This weekend won't be different;^ | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Sep 19 1991 19:36 | 19 |
| re-1 I think you it it on the nose Clay. 1-2 great pass rushers
would make denvers defense like the NFC bad boys. To bad they didn't
get Smith last year or whenever they offered him $$$.
Maybe, but not likely, Carreker can help out when he gets back in
action oct 6th.
Jack, relax anad breath deeply, your to young for this. You have
been a Denver fan since I've known you, and Denver has played this
"lets see how we can lose this game" type of ball for the past 8-10
years. Yeh, they do have some great come from behind wins, but not to
often.
I'm a Bronco fan for 2 reasons. 1) I have lived in Colorado all my
life (with the exception of some years away at school) so I have been a
fan for 20 years. 2) They're games are always nail biters, SBs not
included.
Tim
|
36.298 | 27-19 Broncos | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 23 1991 11:12 | 33 |
|
Atlanta, we love you!!!!!!!!
First half was pretty lackluster and it was tied 6-6 at intermission.
Elway missed 2 open receivers in the first half and they had to settle
for field goals both times. First he missed Kay heading for the corner
of the end zone and then he missed Kay again when he was *wide* open at
the back of the endzone.
Offense finally produced in the 4th when I thought they would end up
letting the defense take it down to the wire again. Green didn't do
anything until the 4th, when he ran that 63-yarder and then the 20-yard
run to ice it. The offense did have a chance to end the game with
about 10 minutes left leading by 8, but they went 3 downs and out.
I thought SD's defense played well - they at least looked a little more
like the one that has the talent to be one of the league's best instead
of the last-ranked defense in the NFL.
I can see why you Charger guys dislike Henning. I can't believe he
went for that 4th and 6 in the 3rd quarter trailing by 4. Talk about a
terrible call. You don't go for it on 4th and that many yards when
it's still in the 3rd quarter and it's close. Granted, the FG attempt
would've been about 45 yards, but their kicker had alread hit three
from beyond 40 on the day.
The defense had some poor tackling and they should still be
playing more aggressive IMO. I said it last week and I'll say it
again this week - Horan is still kicking poorly.
Joe
|
36.299 | Donks Zap Happless Charges, With about 1 microvolt | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football, Feel The Thunder | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:25 | 24 |
| Well, our beloved Donks did it again..... Not near as bad as usual,
but damn close! I'm talking about letting a far worse team bring a
game very close to the wire. These Donks need to learn to ICE a game
when they have the chance, thats the true mark of a champion.
I think things went a little better this week with the offense. I
guess we can let horse face continue to call plays if he does as
well as he did yesterday. I still say the the collie boy should take
a walk though.
3 - 1.... not to bad at this point in the season.... We're at the
top of the AFC West thanks to Jerry's Kids down in Atlanta Ga. Boy
was I suprised to see that final.... The Faiders just aren't they
team the used to be.
Well, If the Donkeys can stick 3 or four more wins under their belts
this year won't be a total disaster ala the 89-90 season where they
were an embrassment to the state of Co. I really hope they can make
it to the first round of the playoffs.... It will be good experience
for the young guys on the team who haven't been there.
Big Game
|
36.300 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:34 | 5 |
| Do you Donk fans notice what ex-whipping boy and once again genius
Joe Collier is doing up here in NE? He's turned the Pats D into a
juggernaut (67 points allowed). Didn't Reeves say the game had "passed
him by"?
Denny
|
36.301 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:07 | 8 |
|
Yeah, that's great. Glad to see ole Joe doing well. I
always kinda felt he was let go due to pressure from Blowin(tm)
to purge everybody left over from the Red Miller daze.
Has he put any new wrinkles in his defensive schemes?
Claybone
|
36.302 | Collier = 3 Stupidbowl losses for the Donks ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football, Feel The Thunder | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:14 | 8 |
|
I'm glad that Collier is in New England Helping the Patsies......
Now they can retake some of the records the Donks took in their
Stupidbowl thrashings..... That is if they ever make the Playoffs
again... ;^)
Big Game
|
36.303 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,McMurtry | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:46 | 8 |
| � Has he put any new wrinkles in his defensive schemes?
� Claybone
No, but he put a few wrinkles on me n' Denny as we watched Moon
drive the Soilers to two fourth quarter touchdowns. 8^)
/Don
|
36.304 | 2 tough road games are next. | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Sep 23 1991 19:25 | 15 |
| Defense did not get enough pressure on Friesz yesterday. Yes Meck
did FINALLY get to him at the end of the game, but I don't recall any
other sacks.
I thought up the middle looked like Reeves of old. It seems Elway
had the RBs go up the middle 20+ times yesterday. Green didn't do
that much other than the 2 runs as Joe stated. Why keep running up the
middle if its not working? This wasn't Cinncy again.
The faiders sip...or should I say Schreoder......
Any key injuries?
Tim
|
36.305 | wanna buy a bridge? | CNTROL::CHILDS | UpthrutheCracksOutthruthebrokenGlass | Tue Sep 24 1991 08:37 | 12 |
|
Cmon now Big Game get with the program will ya...3 or 4 more wins will make
the season? 2 games against the Patriots, a 5th place schedule, I'd say any-
thing less than 11 wins is a wasted season...
I agree with you though they should bench Elway but not until after this
week. CLAYBROON nailed the resons why earlier.
Green is not Humphrey, anyone who think the Donks were smart not to sign
him....
;^)
|
36.306 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:07 | 6 |
| I see Mikey is back. Hey Mike, I don't want any bridges, its
funner to just drive through the river;^
Maybe the Stellers could by a QB?
Tim
|
36.307 | Hey Mikey.... Donks to the Bowl (HA HA HA HA) | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football, Feel The Thunder | Wed Sep 25 1991 11:26 | 5 |
| Well,..... Leaving for vacation tomorrow, Just didn't want anyone
to think I disappeared after the donks lose to the V-Kings this
weekend.... I'll be back on the 8th or 9th
Big Game
|
36.308 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 25 1991 21:57 | 16 |
| Wasn't last year's Viking game a sunday night game at Minnie also?
Yeah and the Broncos were winning at the half and came out
half asleep in th 3rd quarter and handed Minnie a much needed win.
By that part of the season the pattern was deeply set and I just
couldn't watch the rest of the game. Last year just about all opponents
stood in line to get a come-from-behind-much-needed-win.
Denver has back-to-back games in domes. It's the Homer Dome this week
then on to the House of Pain the following sunday. The 'rap' on the
Broncos is that they can't win on plasto grass and cant win in domes.
Splitting the next 2 sounds reasonable ending up 4-2 and then a week
on the beach.
BoB
GO 9'ERS! (this week anyway)
|
36.309 | Finally 2 minutes to read notes | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Sep 27 1991 18:40 | 9 |
| I think the Broncos stand a better chance at beating the Vikes more
than they do with Houston. Moon will have a field day unless the D puts
major pressure on him.
The Broncos might have a tough time scoring against the Vikes. It
should be interesting. Splitting wouldn't be half bad, but 2 L's are
most likely if Denver continues this "road" trend they have going...
Tim
|
36.310 | BRONCOS 13, Viqueens 6!!!!!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:51 | 41 |
| *Huge* win...Hell, that's an understatement. I think I lost about 5
years off my life in the last 7 minutes though. But we send absolutely
no thanks out to SD and SF :(, making this win all the more important.
Where do we start?...Okay, Lewis' fumble. You know, as soon as Green
left the game, that's the first thing that entered my mind. Here comes
a guy who is cold and has been sitting the whole game. The only thing
that could've been worse here would've been a turnover returned for a
TD. I'll admit, as soon as Minney recovered the fumble I thought
Denver would lose. This game had Buffalo of last year written all over
it. Except this year, it wouldn't be 77 seconds, it would've been ONE
play - the fumble. If Denver would have lost this game they wouldn't
have recovered all season IMO. All I can say is I'll take all those drops
by Minn's receivers. Denver needed this one bad, especially after nearly
having it locked up halfway thru the 4th.
Green was just incredible, ending up with 158 yards. Who would've
thought he'd be leading the AFC in rushing after 5 weeks??? Looked like a
couple of times he would break it. Elway had a subpar night
statistically, but he had terrible protection and many drops by
receivers. Green dropped a probable TD pass in the 2nd quarter.
Offense didn't do too much in the 1st half - I got the
feeling there was some kind of invisible wall around midfield.
Elway's TD run was just great. The way he just bulled over that
fullback got the whole team fired up. As bad as the OL was protecting
Elway, they were obviously opening up some holes for Gaston.
I don't care what Denver does next week at the House of Pain. They
got what they needed here, a split on the road and at least a 4-2
start. If they would've gone on the road and lost road it would've
dropped them to .500 and taken away their momentum and confidence.
I'll put it this way: A win next week would be pure gravy, and I'll be
very surprised if they can go down there and win. (Actually, I'm
surprised when anybody wins down in Houston). Now if we can just get
some help from the Chargers and Luckalo(tm) next week... Damm, I hate
rooting for the Bills.
Joe
|
36.311 | | CAM::WAY | RIP Dr. Seuss | Mon Sep 30 1991 10:54 | 8 |
| I didn't watch much of the game.
How did the deaf player on the d-line do? I saw a news report
on him, and have been trying to follow the story up.
Any info, greatly appreciated....
'Saw
|
36.312 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:29 | 14 |
|
'Saw,
Last week, he got a clutch sack at the end of the game
to help ice it. His name is Kenny Walker BTW.
Last night, Anthony Carter got the ball on a reverse
which looked like it caught the whole defense, including
Walker, overpursuing. Walker hit the brakes and reversed
himself. He took off like a shot and caught Carter on
the sidelines (held him to a 4-6 yard gain). Walker has
great speed.
Claybroon
|
36.313 | Mistakes kill ya every time | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Sep 30 1991 18:14 | 34 |
| That was a good play by Walker. Fletcher was suckered REAL bad on
that. He saw CArter coming around, but kept going for the other back
instead of just side stepping 4-5 steps and catching CArter for a 10
yrd loss. O'well......
I thought it was a good game called by Elway. He did overthrow a
couple, especially down on the 3-5 yard line. I beleive the fullback
or Green was open, but Biff had to "loft" it 3 yards over a Vike
defender, thus missing a wide open reciever. There were alot of
dropped balls by both teams, which will decide momentum every time.
I thought the O-line did ok protecting Elway. I'm not sure how many
times he was sacked, 2 maybe?
The Lewis fumble did p me off, but Denver had to find a way to let
Minny back in.
Horan was 27th in punting a beginning of last night. He had 2 good
kicks inside 20, but looked so-so the rest of the time.
Denver still needs more pressure on QB!!!! If they don't stunt/blitz
this weekend against Houston, then look for blowout by Houston, or
high scoring affair as long as Denver moves the ball well.
Green did have a good night running, but that 1 stat was shown,
which 47% of Green's yards came on 6 carries. Good or bad??? I say
questionable, but last night he was consistant on yards/carry. Did
anyone notice that he seemed to line up farther away from scrimmage
than normal? He looked like Dickerson does way back there.....
Tim
|
36.314 | A Horse is a Donk of course, of course! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 01 1991 14:43 | 2 |
| Mr Ed premiered on Network TV 30 years ago today.
Denny
|
36.315 | | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 14:54 | 3 |
| > Mr Ed premiered on Network TV 30 years ago today.
And I was 3 years and two days old....8^)
|
36.316 | Cute | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Oct 01 1991 16:52 | 3 |
| Hate to tell ya Denny, but a donkey is not the same as a horse;^
Tim
|
36.317 | | CAM::WAY | Thank you, Thank you, Sam I am | Tue Oct 01 1991 17:00 | 9 |
|
A horse is a horse, of course, of course
and no one can talk to a horse, of course,
Unless, of coure, the horse, of course,
Is the famous Mr Ed.
|
36.318 | Mule High stadium | CTHQ2::LEARY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 17:15 | 3 |
| However boys,
A horse + donkey= Mule (Elway's teef)
|
36.319 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 02 1991 08:57 | 4 |
| > -< Mule High stadium >-
What Burrow is it in?
Denny
|
36.320 | | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:08 | 22 |
| Hal-Lay-Yew-Ya, MY Life Is Now Complete!!!!
Went to a "Pizza Hut" lasted night here in Colorado Springs for the
$3.99 "All-U-Can-Eat" special, (they lost money on me). Was there
about 10 minutes when one of the "waiters", and I use the term loosely,
comes walking thru with his hands full of rolled up paper. As he did
at other tables, he stops at my table and says, "Would you like a free
John Elway poster???"
The tone of voice he was using was something like what you'd expect to
hear if someone was asking you if you wanted guaranteed entry to
heaven.
BTW, I took one. Just gotta figure out a use for it. The dog's
already paper trained and I don't have a bird.
(8^)* (8^0* (8^)*
JaKe
|
36.321 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 02 1991 16:42 | 2 |
| gee Jake, now you have something to cover up your Bernie poster!
Denny ;^o
|
36.322 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Oct 02 1991 17:12 | 5 |
|
Hey! You'd better hang onto that poster. Someday, it's
gonna be worth..........well............something. ;^)
Claybroon
|
36.323 | (*^)* (8^0* | CELTIK::JACOB | You Trying to make ME sick???? | Wed Oct 02 1991 17:47 | 13 |
|
>> gee Jake, now you have something to cover up your Bernie poster!
>> Denny ;^o
Nah, I got a Bernie poster in the mail from an ANONYMOUS source.
As soon as I opened it up, my dog ran over and took it right out of my
hands and ran behind the couch with it, and proceeded to soil the thing
right in the middle of Bernice's face.
And they call 'em "dumb animals"!!
JaKe
|
36.324 | Humphrey to SF??? | BSS::JCOTANCH | Would you, Could you, with a goat? | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:33 | 14 |
| It's looks like the Broncos might be able to unload Humphrey. The
Broncos want a 1st and a 3rd round choice. The 49ers offered their
1992 1st round pick about a week and were turned down, but now have
supposedly offered a 1st and a 5th round choice.
Denver certainly won't get his full worth and probably won't get what
they're asking, but they should unload him for what they can get before
the Oct. 8th trading deadline. If they don't trade him before the
deadline he will end up sitting out the entire season and then his
stock will really plummet. Look at the Vikes and Dozier - he's on his
2nd year of a holdout. They'll probably never get anything for him.
Trade Humphrey now Denver and get what you can while the gettin's good!
Joe
|
36.325 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Oct 03 1991 14:26 | 14 |
| I think Reeves should go for a Defensive or off linemen who is a
pro-bowler and a lower draft pick.
Just 'cause Denver gets a 1st round pick, doesn't mean they will get
someone worth while. Plus, if they did get a good 1st rounder, how
long would it take to make this person a starter? All those questions
can be answered better with someone who is already established.
Just my thoughts.....
So Jake, how do ya like this place so far?
Tim
|
36.326 | Denver almost lost as bad as Faids did in Houston | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 07 1991 10:54 | 30 |
|
Denver loses 42-14 but many, many thanks go out to SD as the Faiders
also lose.
Denver was never in this one, but the defense actually played pretty
well. Houston's first TD was a recovered blocked punt in the end zone,
2nd TD was a 1-yard drive after an int, 3rd TD was a 13-yard drive
after a fumble, and the 4th TD was a fumble returned for a TD.
Only Houston's last 2 TD's were good drives of 80 and 74 yards.
Needless to say, Denver's turnovers were *very* costly. Total yardage
was only 376 to 363 in favor of Houston.
But Denver's offense was pathetic in the first half. After that first
drive, before the punt was blocked, I had a feeling it was going to be
a long day. I expected an onslaught of Houston points right after
that, but Denver kept it at 7-0 until the 2nd quarter when the roof
caved in. Once again, Elway was running for his life and was sacked 6
times. I'll tell you, if a team gets ahead of Denver by a couple of
TD's all they need to do is start blitzing Elway. It's kind like
getting ahead of a wishbone team and forcing them to pass. Denver did
do a little in the 2nd half but the game was over for all intense
purposes. The running game was bad yesterday but I felt like it never
got a chance to get in sync - Denver only ran the ball on less than
one-third of their offensive plays.
Joe
|
36.327 | | CELTIK::JACOB | kweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbwe | Mon Oct 07 1991 11:31 | 17 |
| Hey, I found out something out here in Colorado that nobody told me
about.
When did Bif go into the restaurant business??
I was down at the Royal Gorge yesterday, and what place did I see????
"Mr. Ed's Family Restaurant". Now this place is for real. I wonder if
everybody that works there has to wear a jersey with #7 on it, plus a
fake set of Teef!!
Yesterday's special was probably "Burnt Donkey, fried in OIL"!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
36.328 | Bronco's are still in 1st place | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:19 | 11 |
| Well I witnessed Dan Reeves version of the Run n' shoot yourself in the foot.
The mistakes were pitiful Denver wanted a split in the Domes and that's what
they got. The only bright spot was I didn't see any bodies get carried off the
field other than Sean Farrel "shoulder". Denver did injure the Oilers though.
The Houston team is tough,but unless Lee Williams comes back real soon they
are hurting on the Defensive line. They should be able to hold off the rest of
the AFC Central this year.
|
36.329 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Oct 07 1991 14:13 | 10 |
| Well, I guess I'm glad that I missed this game. I turned on the
tube at half time, and NBC was showing the score, and I thought I was
seeing a SB score.
Yes, thanks faiders for choking. KC is next after a 1 week off.
I think KC will win tonight, 'cause the bills defense isn't as good
as they are made up to be.
Tim
|
36.330 | | CELTIK::JACOB | DIH | Mon Oct 07 1991 18:38 | 8 |
| I think all the AFC West will lose (or tie)next week. The only team that
stands a chance at winning is the Broncos. the "BYE" are playing good
ball, and if they don't choke in the 4th, they might win it.
A 8-8 season will win this division, whomever it might be.
JaKe
|
36.331 | But Humphrey's still here... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Oct 09 1991 11:20 | 6 |
| Broncos acquired 8-year veteran offensive tackle Harvey Salem from Detroit
for a 2nd or 3rd round pick in next year's draft, depending on how much he
plays this year. He has played mostly right tackle in his career but
calls left tackle his natural position. He's 6-6, 290.
Joe
|
36.332 | I had to enter this | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 09 1991 11:29 | 25 |
| General Norman Schwartskopf was viewing the battlefield in the
aftermath of Desert Storm when he kicked something in the sand.
Upon closer inspection he noticed it was a lamp and began to
rub it. Out popped a genie who offered the general one wish.
General Schwartskopf pulled out a map o the middle east and said
"I would Like to have Eternal Piece for this entire region on
this map".
"Sorry" the genie replied "That would be Impossible"
General Schwartskopf folded the map and began to walk away when
"Hey Wait a minute" the genie called "You still have a wish"
The General thought for a moment then said
"I would like to see the Denver Broncos Actually win a SUPERBOWL"
HHmmmmm the Genie Pondered...
"Let me see that Map Again"
|
36.333 | Those type of jokes are older than the Genral | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Oct 09 1991 18:31 | 1 |
| re-1 I bet it took you all day to think that one up huh?
|
36.334 | Its a good joke if you not a denver gan... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 10 1991 08:55 | 4 |
| Actually there's proberbly 10 People in here that have already
read that note, unless they never look on the back of that page
that folds out :-)
M_Air
|
36.335 | Ridin' the pines? | UFHIS::MENGLISH | | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:16 | 3 |
| What's the story on Humphries? Did he get traded or will he be picking
splinters out of his butt for the rest of the year? He was a high draft
pick of mine in a homegrown version of fantasy football.
|
36.336 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:32 | 12 |
| Humphrey did not get traded and there's no indications that he'll be
reporting any time soon.
Jeff Mills hurt his knee in practice and will miss 4-6 weeks. That
means Croel will get most or all of the work at LOLB since Tim Lucas is
already out with a broken leg.
The Broncos signed former Pro-Bowl nose tackle Brian Sochia yesterday
and waived DE Jim Szymanski. Sochia was waived by Miami last week.
Joe
|
36.337 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:04 | 11 |
| Now with Sochia in, does that mean Kragen might get less playin'
time? Kragen had a pro-bowl year in 89? ,but I don't think he does
much for pass rushing. of course most of the DL is something to be
desired in pass situations.
Symanszki is no loss. Mills was having a good year so far. To bad.
Did they bench Wymon yet? I'm sure he got burned by the oilers many
times (I didn't see the game)......
Tim
|
36.338 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Oct 10 1991 16:06 | 4 |
| Looks like Bobby will have to sell some of his gold chains to
make it throught the winter.
BoB
|
36.339 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Oct 10 1991 18:30 | 7 |
|
Denver also traded a conditional 2cd or 3rd round draft
pick ('92) to Detroit for an OT named Salem. He's a
veteran lineman and will supposedly shore up the LT
position for Biff.
Claybroon
|
36.340 | e | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football, Feel The Thunder | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:43 | 41 |
|
Well,Well, Well......
I can only say that I am glad that I was in NYC and was fortunate
enough to miss the debachle of a game for the DONKS. I guess my fears
from the Minny game came to pass a week late (I predicted a huge DONK
Lose). The only exposure I had to this game was from BACK BACK BERMAN
on ESPN after the fact. It sure looks like everything was even except
the scoreboard and turnovers at the end of the game. I know the DONKS
are a better team than they showed when they played the Houscum Soilers
weekend before last.
At any rate, I went out to NYC to visit family for a couple of weeks
and when things got really boring I went over to the toxic waste dump
on the other side of the river (Jersey) to visit our favorite Jesters
Fan. Thats right, Jim "The PEE PEE SMOOCHER" Wardle is alive and
well. We went to the Jesters Vs Fish game and had a pretty good time.
I do however have several complaints about the game.
o you can't get more that 2 beers per person per run
o its low alcohol beers so you can't get buzzed
o the beer is $4.00 per 12 oz class
o the beer is warm
o they stop serving beer after the first half
Now you teel me, how the heck is a guy supposed to enjoy a football
game in the "Big East Rutherford" when he can't even have 10 ice cold,
big, alcohol saturated beers. other than that I enjoyed the game.
The only other complaint I have about the experience is that JoJ made
My girl friend, Dan Schnieder and Myself take the train back from
Jersey late at night through the worst parts of both states. The guy
is so selfish. I mean can you beleive it.... He risked our lives
so he could get home in time to get to Jerry before he was out of the
mood..... JoJ, You're Scum !!
Big game
|
36.341 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 16 1991 12:24 | 5 |
| Big Game, Jo* told me over the phone that you were rooting
passionately for the Jets that day and told him that you were always
a closet Jets fan. Is this true?
/Don
|
36.342 | JoJ is a *REAL* Girly Mon !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:43 | 14 |
| Why that scum sucking swine !!! I was rooting for the Jesters but
only becaue you won't make it out of the stadium alive if you don't.
I told JoJ that I would be pretending to root for the happless Jesters
for that reason and that reason only. You guys wouldn't beleive the
way JoJ get dresses up for the games.... It's really a scream !!!
He wears this silly painters hat the has the Jesters logo on it. It's
in such tough shape the Bums in central park have better. Then he has
this jesters sweater that pretty nice until you see the liner his wife
put in it...... It's a picture of K-K-K-Kenny and The Jet(TM) right
next to his heart. To top it off he wears this Jesters Tu-Tu with
Jests boxer shorts under it. It really is a sight to see. The sad
part is that he's one of the more subdued when it come to dress.
Big Game
|
36.343 | Moved by Mod | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:25 | 63 |
| <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 204.0 Denver Broncos Question 5 replies
CRBOSS::ODELL 10 lines 16-OCT-1991 13:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver Bronco Question
Can anyone give me a list of Tight Ends that are on the Broncos ?
I'm in one of those franchise leagues and the only guy i can find
for a tight end is Clarence Kay.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Steve O'Dell
================================================================================
Note 204.1 Denver Broncos Question 1 of 5
BSS::JCOTANCH "Go Air Force - Stun the Irish!" 6 lines 16-OCT-1991 15:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to Kay the Broncos have Sterling Sharpe and Reggie Johnson.
Sharpe is actually used more as an H-back, which is the 2nd tight end
in Denver's offense. It should also be pointed out that Denver uses
their tight ends predominantly for blocking and rarely as receivers.
Joe
================================================================================
Note 204.2 Denver Broncos Question 2 of 5
ANGLIN::KIRKMAN "What a WONDERFUL honeymoon" 4 lines 16-OCT-1991 18:40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sterling Sharp plays for the Packers. His brother plays for the
Broncos. (Don't know first name.)
Commander Scott
================================================================================
Note 204.3 Denver Broncos Question 3 of 5
CELTIK::JACOB "Loaded for Bare-Cat" 8 lines 16-OCT-1991 19:18
-< \ >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Sterling Sharp plays for the Packers. His brother plays for the
>>Broncos. (Don't know first name.)
"Nice N."
JaKe
================================================================================
Note 204.4 Denver Broncos Question 4 of 5
GRANPA::DFAUST "Go for 1000% more" 4 lines 16-OCT-1991 19:28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re+ a few back
Sterling's brother is Shannon.
================================================================================
Note 204.5 Denver Broncos Question 5 of 5
FSOA::JHENDRY "John Hendry, DTN 297-2623" 4 lines 17-OCT-1991 08:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be moved to either the Question and Answer note, or the
Broncos note.
John
|
36.344 | no mention of fines and such.... | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:59 | 10 |
| It's reported that Bobby Humphrey has reported to the Broncos Centre.
Reeves & co have asked for a 2 week unable to play roster spot for him.
Something like that anyway.
I think this is great! He won't be Denver's answer, but he will
help, especailly in games against a good run defense. He can run
someone over where Green can't. Hopefully he is in good shape, and
the year isn't blown.
Tim
|
36.345 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Go Air Force - Stun the Irish! | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:42 | 11 |
| Humphrey has indeed reported and isn't in too bad of shape according to
Reeves. Says he got tired of watching football on TV (Probably also
got tired of not getting those big paychecks).
Another must win for Denver this Sunday against the Chiefs. If Denver
loses, they're gonna be playin' catchup in the division the rest of the
year and will probably be relegated to competing for a wildcard.
They've got to win at least their home games against LA and KC to win
the division. Plus, KC has yet to lose a game in the division.
Joe
|
36.346 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:06 | 9 |
| Heard on the radio here in Colo Springs this am that Humphreys holdout
will end up, when all is totalled up, costing him $300,000.
Breaks my freakin heart.
Money grubbing fools!!
JaKe
|
36.347 | Nice outfit :-) | SALEM::DODA | These are new days... | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:43 | 2 |
| I see Bobby had the Audra Barkley look for his press conference
yesterday....
|
36.348 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:40 | 27 |
| That was a very "tacky" looking outfit. His haircut was funny, and
I don't feel sorry for him if Bowlen still makes him pay the fines.
Still glad to have him back. Will he be available to play this
weekend even though it may be light duty?
Now all Denver needs is a premier pass rusher, and a good O left
tackle.
Now for KC, Denver MUST stop the rush, and then force Deberg to
pass, which means a major pass rush. I think Denver better play
man-man and have 7-8 men up on the line almost every play.
Look for Atwater and Smith making most of the plays. If Meck plays
well, then Denver will stop the run.
The OL better get the run blocking going or it will be a long day for
Biff and a good day for Thomas....
KC will not stomp Denvers butt like they did Miami and Buffalo.
Denver has a better defense than those teams, plus its a home game,
thankfully!!
Tim
Out on a limb with a prediction of:
Broncos 24 KC 20
|
36.349 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 18 1991 15:58 | 4 |
|
Have the donks ever won an NFL championship?
Have the donks beaten the DAWGS THIS year?
|
36.350 | Nice Doo, Bobby !!!! And The clothes are Killer ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:00 | 25 |
|
Well, Booby H. Really looked nice at his press conference lasted(TM)
night didn't he...... I don't know about these guys, are the football
players or fashion models ! Oh well, it is nice to see him back. I
just hope his return doesn't disrupt the rest of the team. Also, I
think he should have to earn back his starting job, Gaston has done
well for the Donks and should have to be knocked off the top by B.H.
to lose his starting role.
Now on the the dismal facts about Sundays game against the Chiefs.
Look for the Donks to get thourghly dominated on the lines. Mr. Ed
will be running for his life all day and Atwater and Smith better eat
their wheaties because the Nigerian Nightmare will be in Denvers
secondary all day long. Does this add up to a Donk lose you ask???
Well, not necessarily. The Donks have a long histor of playing tough
at home...... And K.C. and the Donks always seem to split or the Donks
win both.... Look for a low scoring roough and tumble game in the
Pile-it-High City this Sunday...... My Prediction
Donks 17
K.C. 13
Big Game
|
36.351 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Loaded for Bare-Cat | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:18 | 7 |
| re.349
I guess now it must be "officially" football season. The Groaner has
arrived spewing the same toxic sewage he spews EVERY year.
JaKe
|
36.352 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:27 | 3 |
| Has the groaner seen ANY CLeveland team win an important game in his
lifetime?
Denny
|
36.353 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Fri Oct 18 1991 16:30 | 6 |
|
I don't think so....... The Donks always seem to bring them back
to reality when their head get a little swollen.... The Clowns are
a bunch of good for nothin bums..
Big Game
|
36.354 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Oct 18 1991 18:04 | 6 |
| I don't think Bobby is home free just yet. He has created a lot
of animosity out there. If he drops one pass, if he fumbles 1 ball,
if he doesn't get a 100+ he will feel the wrath of Donkdom and that
can be awfull painfull.
BoB
|
36.355 | Be Careful | QUASER::HUNTER | Air Force Football,Feel The Thunder | Fri Oct 18 1991 18:25 | 7 |
| BoB,
I beleive you're right..... DonkDom will come down hard on
the Humpster if'n he screws up one little bit. Let him cost
the Donks a game and they'll run him outa town !!
Big Game
|
36.356 | Or everyone was out late celebrating | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Rockin' in the Free World | Mon Oct 21 1991 13:35 | 2 |
|
Must be a state holiday in Colorado today..
|
36.357 | Death Grip Rules | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Mon Oct 21 1991 14:51 | 10 |
| I just talked to Hoot Gibson to get his personal in-depth analysis...
The Denver death grip is alive and well. The Donks Cause a 4th and inches fumble
KC recovers about 6 yrds down field. "FIRST DOWN". No from the sidelines Pat
Blowind is phoning the replay booth. Scanning the archives they find the "Ken
Stabler Forward" rule This gives the ball and the game to Denver.
Typical game for the Stripes.
Jeff
|
36.358 | DEnver has better defense than Buffalo & Miami! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Oct 21 1991 16:29 | 15 |
| Its not a holiday, just sooooo busy, that I shouldn't even be in
here now.
Well Big game's and my predictions were close. I think the Denver
defensive line and linebackers did the best job I have seen from them.
They put a hurt on Deberg all day long. Even when he didn't get sacked,
he was getting hit right after the ball left his hand.
The officiating stunk. The one killer was when a KC reviever trapped
the ball, and it wasn't reviewed. Then Shannon Sharpe did the same
thing and of course it was ruled incomplete....o'well, the Broncos
won.
|
36.359 | Denver in 1st, who'd of thunk it. | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Rockin' in the Free World | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:30 | 8 |
| <<< Note 36.358 by COMET::JACKSONTA "You forgot the Violin again!!" >>>
> -< DEnver has better defense than Buffalo & Miami! >-
I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone to disagree with you
on that one. Both teams are hurtin' for defense this year.
Marty, the frustration continues!
|
36.360 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Go for 1000% more | Mon Oct 21 1991 17:36 | 21 |
| re: officiating vs. Cheifs
I was amazed that on the two big plays the officials in the replay
booth got them right. It happens so little that I was simply amazed.
The first replay showed that DeBerg was clearly down on one knee before
he threw the TD pass, so the marked the ball where his knee touched
rather that awarding KC a TD, with is what the on the field officials
did.
Later on the Okoye (sp) fumble, they field officials spotted the ball
real poorly, the replay folks did a better job (but not perfect) and KC
did not get the fist down (which was the correct call, IMO). The
funniest part of that play was the measurement after they had the
"precision" spot using the replay folks.
I agree that the trap catches were called poorly but as it turned out
they didn't have an effect on the outcome. Both of the other call would
have changed the number of points on the board.
Dennis
|
36.361 | Go Donks...... Big Bucks Coming My Way Today ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 21 1991 18:05 | 11 |
|
The Donks played a great defensive game yesterday until the
middle of the 4th quarter when Williams started running all
over them. I'll tell ya, it's a good thing for the donk faithful
that Dennis "The Hammer" Smith knocked him out cold or I think
there would have been a different outcome. The Donks "D" but it
to Deberg..... I'll bet he's still laying in bed today saying
"I'm to old for this sh*t
Big Game
|
36.362 | New England 20-17 | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 22 1991 10:04 | 2 |
| Any predictions on the Denver-New England game this week ?
Anyone else think the Pats will beat the Donks in Foxboro ?
|
36.363 | hoping the Pats can pull it off, but... | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Tue Oct 22 1991 11:06 | 7 |
| Actually, the 27-17 Denver prediction in another note sounds about right
to me....Broncos should take it but they'll have to earn it.
FFL-related question -- is Bobby Humphrey expected to start on Sunday?
py
|
36.364 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:29 | 15 |
| Re: -1,
I too am interested in finding out if Humphery will be *activated* for
the Pats game. As yet, he has not been added to their 'active roster'
(the Broncos got a two week roster exemption). It's likely too much to
ask that he *start*, but I'd be psyched just to see him in the lineup!!
My *starter* is Thurman Thomas, but he's off this week....and I'd
like to be able to keep Humphrey...but I can't afford zeroes from my RB
this week!!
Any update as to Humphrey's status would be appreciated.
Nelly
|
36.365 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:41 | 33 |
|
> Later on the Okoye (sp) fumble, they field officials spotted the ball
> real poorly, the replay folks did a better job (but not perfect) and KC
> did not get the fist down (which was the correct call, IMO). The
> funniest part of that play was the measurement after they had the
> "precision" spot using the replay folks.
That's what killed me. How can they spot the ball from replay on
something like a measurement that often comes down to inches? But even
so, it was quite obvious that Okoye fumbled before he had the first
down.
What a pass by Elway. 3rd and 17, KC has the momentum, and it looks
like Denver will punt and give the Chiefs good field position with
about 5 minutes left to play. Remind anyone of last year's 4th and 10
pass against KC on Monday night?
I was impressed with that Harvey Williams. He's quick and has nice
moves.
Croel is really starting to play well. He had 2 crucial sacks on
DeBerg. If KC would've drove and tied the game and won, Denver
would've looked back at 2 fumbles by KC that drive. Both were
recovered by the Chiefs.
This week's game at NE this week is one many people think the Broncos
should win, but NE is far from a sure win, especially at home. Just
ask Houston, who is possibly the AFC's best team. This game was
originally scheduled for 11 am when the schedules came out but has been
changed to 2pm.
Joe
|
36.366 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 13:47 | 8 |
| I forgot to mention Humphrey. He will probably be activated against
the Pats but won't start and it's doubtful he will get in the game.
Gaston Green should be ready to start after missing the KC game.
Also, just read that Croel is 3rd in the AFC with 6 sacks.
Joe
|
36.367 | Donks win a close one against the Upstart Patsies ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Tue Oct 22 1991 14:03 | 7 |
| I already made my prediction for the Pats/Donks game.....
Donks 27
Pats 17
Big Game
|
36.368 | 2pm mtn time, are you sure Joe? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Oct 22 1991 19:07 | 17 |
| KC fumbled 4x in this game, and recovered all of them. I think that
is lucky!
Denver should win this game. The Patsies don't seem to be a cake
walk, especially beating the Oilers and Vikes. Did they beat Indy for
the 3rd win?
Denver has the better all around team, but like Hunter sayd, the
Donks like to always take it to the wire no matter the opponent.
My prediction:
Denver 24 Pats 13
Tim
|
36.369 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 22 1991 20:01 | 3 |
| > -< 2pm mtn time, are you sure Joe? >-
Positive.
|
36.370 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:50 | 14 |
| Gaston Green's thigh is still bothering him and Lewis will likely start
in his place. Humphrey should see considerable playing time.
DE Ron Holmes is bothered by a knee and Kenny Walker will start in his
place.
If Denver's going to win the division they need to do 2 things: win
7 or 8 games at home and win 3 or 4 on the road. They're 1-2 on the
road now with games left at KC and at Seattle among others. I'll be
very happy if they can go 4-4 on the road. If Denver can get this one
at NE they're in great shape at the midway point of the season at 6-2.
Joe
|
36.371 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Fri Oct 25 1991 13:57 | 4 |
| Has Humphrey been officialy (sp?) activated yet?
Nelly
|
36.372 | Not yet. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Fri Oct 25 1991 15:33 | 4 |
| He will be activated and WILL play Sunday.
Just not officially.
|
36.373 | | CAM::WAY | Go Wahoos! | Fri Oct 25 1991 15:36 | 5 |
| �He will be activated and WILL play Sunday.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Plug in them Duracells!
|
36.374 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Fri Oct 25 1991 16:44 | 4 |
| Should be an interesting game.... donks by ten !!
|
36.375 | Duller than Good Morning America | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Fri Oct 25 1991 18:48 | 14 |
| Should be an interesting game.... donks by ten !!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dream on Cacti !!!
It'll be over by halftime. John Henry's highlight will be counting the Pats 1st
downs on 1 hand.
Skiing at Keystone's 1000' snow puddle will be more exciting.
Jeff
|
36.376 | Elway is a great player though | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Mon Oct 28 1991 08:49 | 8 |
| Lucky SOB's. What a whiny miserable bunch the Donks are. Bitched and
moaned to da refs all day. WAAAAAH WAAAAAH. Reeves is a foot-stampin'
crybaby( as are half the team) GO KC, Raiders, anybody but the "I want
my Maypo" Donks.
MikeL
|
36.377 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:22 | 7 |
| Yo, Jeff Riggen - at least get the name right - it's Hendry, not Henry.
I'm not a steel driving man, nor a horse nor a fashion designer.
It was an exciting game, too. I'm glad my physical is Wednesday
instead of today otherwise I'd be off the blood pressure meter.
John
|
36.378 | Pats will have another shot at them in Mile High | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:23 | 2 |
| I realize the Broncos won, but I think Big Game should be "cakewalking"
his way to the crow caf�.
|
36.379 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Don't drink the Koolaid | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:40 | 18 |
|
I watched the game a couple of things stood out to me. The OL for the
Pats really opened some big holes and the RB realy took advantage. The
Broncos almost blew it by going into a prevent defense and not putting
any pressure on the QB during the last drive. Foxboro Stadium is a
mess. Turf was flying up on every step from the git go. Did they have a
college or HS game there earlier this weekend, or is the field just a
piece of crap?
Who was brain dead, McPherson or the QB? I can't believe that Dick
didn't tell him about a million time during the last timeout to throw
the ball away during the last play if there wasn't a receiver open. I
heard someone on the radio (in Philadelphia) say that the Patriots
should have started a fight or something to draw a flag (and get the
clock stopped). The worst coaching and stupid play I've seen in a
while, and I see the Eagles every week. :*)
Dennis
|
36.380 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | B-ay-bay, B-E-bee | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:25 | 16 |
|
To: The Denver Broncos Football Club
Denver, Colorado
Sirs:
I am pleased to announce that one (1) NFL win has been donated
in your name on behalf of the New England Patriots Football Club.
We hope you will appreciate the generosity of this gift
in your quest for a successful season.
Best wishes,
Hugh Millen, PHD (Patriots for High Draft)
|
36.381 | What can you do.... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:51 | 10 |
| Calling this a gift is being too generous.... First the Blocked FG
from 25 yrds....Did we forget what play they were suppose to be
blocking for ??? Then Hugh...Please, who do you think you are
FLUTIE...???? Throw the ball into the back of the end zone....
DONT THROWN an INTERCEPTINO, DONT GET SACKED and do not attempt
to run from 20 yrds out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The should be 4-4
pats, plus the disgracefull loss to the browns...we could be
looking at a 5-3 instead of a 3-5 very, very, very disapointed...
M-A-Brooks
|
36.382 | a win is a win | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:06 | 19 |
| Well FWIW, The donks played awefull offense. I don't want to take
the credit away from the pats DL, but the offense looked slow and
looking for a clue.
Elway should have torn the defensive backs up, since NE has(d) the
worst pass defense in the NFL.
That offsides on Elway was bogus IMO.
I agree that the prevent defense means prevent yourself from winning
instead of the other team. When Denver had the Pats in 3 and 14 on the
last drive, why in the heck would they only rush 4 guys? Put pressure
on a rookie(?) QB, and he will do the Jay Shroeder act of choking.
It was very ugly from a Bronco stand point, and look for the donks
to do better in mile hi Dec 1st.
Tim
|
36.383 | An ugly game but a win nonetheless | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:24 | 34 |
|
Do they get any uglier than this? This one probably rivaled the 6-6
tie between Oklahoma State and Iowa State. Rather than a defensive
battle I prefer to call it a battle of inept offenses. How about
Denver's 1st and goal right before half. Was that maybe their all-time
worst goal-line blunder? Had to be.
> Broncos almost blew it by going into a prevent defense and not putting
> any pressure on the QB during the last drive.
Yes. And doesn't this seem to be a regular statement every Monday
morning?
> Foxboro Stadium is a mess. Turf was flying up on every step from the
> git go.
The Denver radio announcers said that many of the Patriots have
complained about the field. I'm sure visiting teams aren't too happy
with it either.
I guess there were a couple good plays by Denver. Elway & Jackson made
a great on that 3rd and long on the game-winning FG drive. Denver had
one real nice drive in the first quarter, but that ended in a FG.
Lewis ran real well on that drive. Russell is turning into a good
receiver.
Vance returning punts is a joke. A guy who's afraid to get hit sure as
hell shouldn't be returning punts. About the only good thing about him
is he's pretty dependable at catching and holding onto the ball. I
can't believe Reeves cut Clark. He may be one-dimensional, but he's
the only player resembling a punt/kick returner they had.
Joe
|
36.384 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:34 | 5 |
| RE: .380
Just like the Faiders have been handed 2 bullshit wins by Kemp and
Everett the past 2 weeks.
Joe
|
36.385 | Vance Johnson on the Plus. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:50 | 5 |
| The advantage of having Vance Johnson is he does have good hands. Late in the
game he made a diving catch for 5 yrds. This play hasn't worked with Russell
yet.
|
36.386 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:55 | 11 |
| This is the first yaer with natural turf in Foxboro. They had to rush
to get it in for the international soccer matches. It will be better
next year. Another growing season should help.
The Pats did a good job of covering the Bronco receivers, but a poor
job of containing the scrambling Elway. Then again, they couldn't have
done too badly since they didn't allow a TD to one of the top 10
offenses in the AFC.
This is the second week in a row that the Pats have had a FG blocked.
The special teams have to produce better than that.
|
36.387 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Donks Know Okoye | Mon Oct 28 1991 15:24 | 7 |
|
Well, Looked like the donks were just going to march on the
patsies alll day until they pulled their standard gag inside the five
and had to settle for an FG..... You can tell Revees is callin the
friggen plays again... Go Donks !!!! First place and holding tight !!
Big Game
|
36.388 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Oct 31 1991 14:32 | 14 |
| Half season wrap up.
Donks just cant seem to put anyone away. Cinci in the home opener
was a blow out and it caught me off gaurd. Since then the Bengals
have proven that that was not a fluke. Every game there after has
been a nail biter except for the Oilers game. I'm still confused
as to just how good or bad these guys are but at 6-2 they have
exceeded everybody's expectations. This is a very big IF, but
IF Denver can beat Pitts, and IF Denver can win the following 2
games, the AFC West is settled for the season with 5 games remaining.
Let the rest fight for wild card spots and Denver can fight for
homefield advantage throughout. It's unbelievable.
BoB
|
36.389 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 31 1991 15:33 | 41 |
|
> Donks just cant seem to put anyone away.
But we know this isn't anything new, unfortunately.
> IF Denver can beat Pitts, and IF Denver can win the following 2
> games, the AFC West is settled for the season with 5 games remaining.
True, but that would mean winning at KC, which I consider doubtful at
best. They should beat Pittburgh; a loss to the Steelers could turn
this season into a disaster in a hurry. After that a key home game
against the Faiders. A win against LA would do 2 things: put the Faids
virtually out of the division race at 3 games out, and Denver could
afford to lose the next 2 on the road (at KC, at Sea), which wouldn't
surprise me at all. That 2-game road will be very crucial not only for
Denver's divison title chances but also if they don't beat both
Pittsburgh and LA. But right now a split in the upcoming 2-game road
stretch will be considered a good accomplishment IMO.
> Let the rest fight for wild card spots and Denver can fight for
> homefield advantage throughout.
This is looking way ahead, but right now I would say the best Denver
could hope for is a bye in the first week of the playoffs. To get
homefield throughout the playoffs they would need a lot of help. Houston
only has 1 loss and has beaten Denver, so in essence they're 2 games
ahead of Denver. Denver could possibly tie Buffalo and win a
tiebreaker but the Bills probably won't lose a heck of a lot more
playing in the AFC East. And I expect Denver will at least 2 or 3 more
games.
Back to the present and this week's game against Pittsburgh. The
Steelers are only averaging 25:25 in time of possession and their
opponenets have converted 47% of 3rd down plays. They also haven't
forced a turnover in their last 3 games.
Green is still bothered by a pulled thigh muscle and is doubtful for
the Steeler game.
Joe
|
36.390 | 6-10 still beats last year. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Thu Oct 31 1991 16:13 | 6 |
| I still shiver when I think of Merrill Hoge running for 140+ yrds lasted year
in a total blowout against Denver.
Pittsburgh is not a bad team and Denver could wimp out in the cold night air
this week.
|
36.391 | Riggen: The Eternal Pessimist | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 31 1991 17:12 | 1 |
|
|
36.392 | Steelers shouldn't be much of a problem for Denver | SHALOT::MEDVID | be still be calm be quiet now | Fri Nov 01 1991 08:06 | 13 |
| >Pittsburgh is not a bad team and Denver could wimp out in the cold night air
>this week.
The hell they aren't a bad team. Pittsburgh has beaten no one of any
substantial talent this season. They aren't impressive, they make too
many mistakes, and they don't exploit the big talents of the best tight
end in the league.
Elway should have a big day against a suspect secondary and lack of
pass rush.
--dan'l
|
36.393 | It supposed to be 10 above without wind chill | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Nov 01 1991 13:38 | 4 |
| Quit hexing the Broncos Dan'l;^ You know Denver almost always plays
to the level of their opponent.
Tim
|
36.394 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Nov 01 1991 14:22 | 9 |
| All I'm saying in .388 is at the half way point Denver is in 1st.
A 3-0 start in the second half locks the AFC West cahmpionship.
I'm not blowing smoke here. We all know that won't be easy but it
is within the relm of possibility. I like their position. I also
like the fact that most everybody is still focusing on KC and LA with
Denver sitting on top quiet like mice. Now is the time for the Broncos
to wake up.
BoB
|
36.395 | let sleeping broncos lie | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Fri Nov 01 1991 18:25 | 4 |
|
Don't wake 'em up Bob! They're doing just fine sleeping. :*)
Claybroon
|
36.396 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Say goodnight to music | Mon Nov 04 1991 00:53 | 9 |
| God, i hate to say this, but Elway looked better than ever, on the run
and throwing the ball... Green drops a pass that would have probaly put
game into OT.. DONKS WIN.. 20-13..
DINZ
|
36.397 | 7-2, full game lead | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 04 1991 12:04 | 26 |
| You know, just once I'd like to relax in the 4th quarter and enjoy an
easy Bronco victory. But instead, after having numerous opportunites
to be ahead by 2 or 3 scores, Denver makes it a close one again and
continues to give me premature gray hairs. Not to take anything away
from Pittsburgh and O'Donnell mind you.
I was very pleased with how well Denver came back quickly after being
down 10-zip. But after getting 2 TD's on scoring drives, they had to
settle for FG attempts on their next 3 scoring opportunities, missing
the last one.
Lewis ran great, sure making things look good in the backfield now.
Elway missed some open open receivers but made a couple good runs and a
typical Elway play late in the game where he almost got sacked at his
own 5 and completed a first-down up to around mid-field. I also liked
seeing all the pressure on O'Donnell.
On Denver's last drive Jackson was definitely interefered with on a
long pass from Elway. That would've put Denver down around the 20 and
probably would've sewed things up.
These last 3 games have been nailbiters and could've gone either way,
but these are the type of games they were losing last year.
Joe
|
36.398 | Donks on the road to the AFC Championship game !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 04 1991 13:11 | 18 |
| After last nights performance there can be nodoubt that the Donks
will be atop the AFC west at seasons end. They really seem to be
coming around but still lack the ability to put a team away. The
squeelers played a good game and made it more interesting than I
like it to be. Elway seems to be playing well and baring injury
will carry the donks to the AFC championship game. The Donks need
to continue to improve to be on a plane that will allow them to
make another Superbowl appearance. I have to say, I am suprised to
see them at 7-2 after last years debachle of a season. The donks
are a great team with a great QB...... A little more maturity in
both backfields and they will be a dynasty !!! ;^)
Big Game
P.S. O'Donnel is going to be a good QB for the Squeelers !!! The guy
has poise and plays the leadership role well especially for his age.
Look for the Squeelers to dominate the central nexted(tm) year !!
|
36.399 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Nov 05 1991 10:03 | 13 |
| I didn't like seeing the donks let the squeelers back in! Elway did
miss some key passes.
I also think the offense is sputtering because Reeves is calling
the majority of plays. Elway & co better have it together for the
faids next week, or it will be a long game.
Joe, expect another 4th qtr "prevent" and let the other team in the
game, but hang on enough to win type of game against the faids. I was
hoping to go, but its the 1st of the month "no money" blues.
Tim
|
36.400 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:19 | 5 |
| It's been close to 2 years since Denver has been invoveled in
anything resembeling a big game. This week's Raiders at Broncos
will tell the tale.
BoB
|
36.401 | Donks a shoe in ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:36 | 9 |
|
It's already in the bag!!! I'm going to the game and
the Donks always win when I'm there. Can't recall ever
attending a game in which they lost !!
Big Game (Whos Going to The Big Game)
Donks 31
Faids 24
|
36.402 | Is Big Game really The Barrel Man? | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Tue Nov 05 1991 14:45 | 5 |
|
No way they'll score that many points Cacti. As usual,
it'll be 16-13 or so for whoever wins.
Claybroon
|
36.403 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 05 1991 16:11 | 6 |
| Hey ClayWade....
The Donks are going to break it open soon..... This game
is as good as any for that to happen !! I stick by my prediction
Big Game
|
36.404 | Don't forget overtime | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Nov 06 1991 15:45 | 20 |
| Jack, did you forget about the time 6 of us went to that Monday
nite game against the faids????
Does a 24-0 half time lead for the Broncos strike any bad memmories?
Some guy in the faids o-backfield named smith decided he would learn
how to run.
Remember the 35 min trip between the springs and denver and how we
went about getting tickets......As buzzed as I got that nite, I don't
know how I remmebered;^
Don't hex the donks;^*()*^$@~!
Tim...who might be going, but will have to get tix the same
way....scallpers(sp?).....
|
36.405 | Funny how you forget the bad | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Wed Nov 06 1991 16:56 | 7 |
|
OH CRAP !!! Thats right... I had forgot all about that
one..... Must be selective Memory !! Oh well, looks like
I may not be able to make the game this weekend anyhow.....
Something came up and I'm still trying to get out of it.
Big Game
|
36.406 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 06 1991 19:59 | 11 |
| It had been years since I witnessed a loss at home too untill last
year's Raiders game. It wasn't that cold but it was really windy
and that drove 1/2 the fans out with about 5 min left. Donks down
by 10 but wait, they drive to close within 3. Donks hold the Faids
and drive for the winning or tieing score. Faids' deathgrip stops
Donks so Treadwell scoots out for a medium range FG. The snap, the
kick, it's on the way, it's NO GOOD! Seemed to be the pattern they
were in last season but right now their on a 3 game win streak and
a 6 game win streak at home.
BoB
|
36.407 | Yesssss!!! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Even so, come, Lord Jesus. | Mon Nov 11 1991 08:06 | 11 |
| There you have it, the men have been separated from the boys.
Art Shell still owns Elway and Co., and Reeves still doesn't
have a clue.....:-) God I love Monday morning noting after the
Raiders beat the Donks (even in New England). The only bad part
about it is that now I gotta listen to the Donk fans snivel about
how Uncle Al paid off the refs, and all the other lame excuses.
With a Raider win next week, and some help from the Chiefs, the
Raiders should be tied for first.
Carlos
|
36.408 | 17-16 great game. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Riggamotis RULEZ | Mon Nov 11 1991 10:51 | 5 |
| Art Shell has taught the Denver Death grip to his offensive line. Denver let
this one get away. The running game was great on both sides of the ball Craig,
Lewis, Allen and Green forced both defenses to team tackle.
Jeff
|
36.409 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 11 1991 11:17 | 52 |
|
Typical Bronco-Faid game that could've gone either way in the end.
Amazing that these games are almost always so close and low-scoring.
The most glaring stats for Denver yesterday: terrible special teams and
3 turnovers (to no turnovers for LA). Those turnovers and woeful
special teams play wiped out a good rushing performance by Denver.
It's not too often you will see a team rush for 200 yards and lose.
The defense did a good job of keeping Denver in the game in the 3rd
quarter. Denver turned the ball over on 2 straight posessions, once
inside their own 5-yard line, but the Faids only ended up with 3 points
off the 2 turnovers. The Faiders defense is obviously keeping them in
playoff contention this year. What is the Faid offense averaing,
around 15 points per game?
Although the offense may have missed a scoring opportunity or two in
the first half, their special teams was undoubtedly the biggest factor
in this devastating loss. Witness these mistakes:
- A punt that was nearly blocked in the 2nd quarter. The LA player ended
up running into Horan and gave Denver a first down but it should've
been blocked.
- A holding on a punt on the 3rd quarter that, after the penalty, ended
up giving the Faiders 20 more yards of field position. LA scored the
go-ahead TD on that drive.
- The blocked extra point.
- The blocked field goal at the end, which wouldn't have counted anyway
because Kay was flagged for holding and the game would've ended right
then and there.
Plus the fact that Gossett had a marvelous day punting for LA.
If Denver is to win the division, I say they need a split in these next
2 road games, something I don't think they will do. They will almost
definitely lose at KC next week. At this point I hope they can at
least get the first wild-card slot and play 1 game at home. Obtaining
the best or second-best record in the AFC and a first-round bye in the
playoffs is just about out of reach right now. This loss killed 'em.
> With a Raider win next week, and some help from the Chiefs, the
> Raiders should be tied for first.
First of all, the Faiders will still be a game behind KC after they
beat Denver next week. And that's if they beat America's team, the
Seahawks. Secondly, if you were smart you would be pulling for Denver
because the Faids already have the upper hand over them with the sweep
and the Broncos have to play 4 of their last 6 on the road.
Joe
|
36.410 | $%^*#%^&#$&%^&#$%^&#$%^ | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 11 1991 11:26 | 16 |
|
AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Did you see all those 50 dollar bills Uncle Al was handing out. !!
This was another good Bronco/Faider Game... The Donks let it get away
from `em.... Hard to beleive that Dan is 0-5 against Art. Oh well,
The donks could have wrapped it up with this win and a win against
K.C nexted(tm) week but as is their usual fashion they will have
to drag it out till the end. Both teams played well and in all
honesty I thik the bad calls evened out in the end with the exception
of that damn so called fumble at the goal line.... Good Job Donks...
The faids are once again a BIG problem of the DONKS....
Give me my crow Raw..... I like that way !!
Big Game
|
36.411 | What can you say other than "CLASSIC" | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Nov 11 1991 11:30 | 15 |
| I was there and give the game ball to the faider special teams. I
wouldn't go so far to say the boys and men are seperated. The game
was obviously even with the exception of all the blocked kicks.
Biff did not have a good day throwing. He had open recievers that he
missed. Turnovers were critical, especially that fumble in Denvers
own end of the field.
All in all, it was nothing less than was expected between these 2
teams.
Denver needs to win next week @KC if they want to win the division.
If they lose (which is likely), then wild card looks more like reality.
Tim
|
36.412 | Denver is a probable wild card now :^( | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 11 1991 19:19 | 19 |
| Tim, I don't think Denver necessarily has to win at KC next week but
they need a win at Seattle and then at San Diego because those 2 are
division games. 11-5 might take the divison and is probably the best
Denver can hope for at this point. And they can go 11-5 by winning
their remaining 2 home games and splitting their 4 road games. The
Faiders will definitely lose at least 2 more games. I also believe KC
has a tough road ahead but the Chiefs would probably win a tiebreaker
over Denver because they would probably end up with a better division
record than Denver (assuming KC beats Denver next week). The best
(realistically) Denver will do in the division is 5-3, while the Chiefs
have only lost 1 division game so far. But KC still has to play at LA
and at Seattle (I think).
Hey Big Game, what happened to your perfect record of Denver never
losing when you're there? Did you make it up to the game. We were
counting on you and you let us down.
Joe
|
36.413 | Didn't make it but Tim was there !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 11 1991 19:49 | 17 |
| DAMN !!! I didn't make it up..... Had some other stuff come
up and just couldn't justify the game in light of the situation.
At any rate.... Tim pointed out that he and I attended a game
at Mile High which the Donks lost..... Some how my selective
memory let me over look that sad event. Oh well, So the donks get
swept by art and the Faids.... I still think that the Donks will
win the division and surely finish the season with a better record
than the Faids..... That all I need to take som $$$ for Uncle Hootsie.
Can't wait to collect on that one.... Hootsie really hate to pay
off on Donk Bets
Go Donks !!
Big Game
|
36.414 | | 56590::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Nov 12 1991 09:22 | 7 |
| Denver as a possible wild card?
I thought someone in this here conf. guaranteed Cleveland a wildcard
What gives? 8^)
MikeL
|
36.415 | No `Spots in this topic | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 12 1991 11:12 | 11 |
| How dare you mention the name of the lowly Browns Spots in this
topic.... To even have the `Spots name in here is a slam to the
mighty Broncos.... ;^) The Spots are going no where but home
for X-Mas this year. The Donks on the other hand are going to win
AFC west or at worst take home a wildcard spot for the `offs.....
Don't really matter... I honestly don't think they have the team
to win beyond the first round anyhow unless they pick up the offense
and get more presure on the QB's on defense.... The donks will
have a good year.... unlike the `Spots !
Big Game
|
36.416 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 12 1991 12:03 | 8 |
| It's good to see that the Raiders, unlike some of their fans, showed
some class after the game. Art Shell said, "This just brings Denver
back to us. Instead of being two games behind, we're just one." Howie
Long said, "We're lucky." Bob Golic said, "There's no domination
involved. We beat them...but it's a battle every time we play them."
Joe
|
36.417 | REeves actually questioned his own play calling | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Nov 12 1991 13:41 | 18 |
| There was no domination! The faids did just enough to get by which
the Broncos have done in some games. This time it caught up to them
(denver).
If you look at the stats, you would wonder how the faids were in the
game, but as typical of the faids, "just win baby" no matter what it
looks like. Turnovers decided this game, and Perryman should get a
splinter;^
Joe, you are right about next weeks game, but if the Broncos beat
KC and end up the year tied with KC, then I believe Denver has the
advantage of beating them 2x.
I think 11-5 is possible, but with the offense studdaring (sp?)
10-6 is most likely.
TTim
|
36.418 | Give the Donks a real schedule and they're 4-5 at best... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Tue Nov 12 1991 16:33 | 22 |
|
Well I'm a day late but not a dollar short on laughs..
hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa
last week they're winning the division, this week it's just a wildcard...
perch and twirl perch and twirl my my...
Did the mighty Donks really loose to WRONG_WAY Schroeder again?
;^)
and where was that phatom hold on the Raiders' TD? did ya get a number
on that guy ref? As usual in Pile it High when the situation is critical
the donks get the flags...
gotta make ya wonder...
thanks BG for all the copliments about the Steelers if I was you I'd hop
of this sinking ship now and join a real team....
mike
|
36.419 | You are only heard from when denver loses and sqeelers win | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Nov 12 1991 18:32 | 29 |
| re-1 If you want BG to jump ship to a real team, I would think
he'd choose the 'skins, which he can't stand. What other team is
dominating most everyone in the league?
What is a real schedule? Dont tell me the squeelers have one....They
play one good team 2x a year and 2 bad teams 2x a year. Besides, the
broncos had the squeelers and the rest of the AFC central on their
schedule, so this must mean the afc central aren't "real" teams!!
Actually nevermind all this, 'cause I forgot the source, and this
source knows how to start the spew and get the denver fans riled.....
Go pay for a playoff birth hosehead;^
Tim
|
36.420 | works like a charm. EVERYTIME!!! ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Tue Nov 12 1991 18:55 | 13 |
|
Tim how can you say that I so deeply hurt...
NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've always bellied up to the CC when it's been my turn...
this year I just haven't had the time to note like previous years as I've
been trying to save DEC all by myself...
many smiles
|
36.421 | Looks like Denver's *much* better than you expected | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 12 1991 19:07 | 41 |
| Well Mike C., it looks like you were way off on your wishful thinking
that Denver would go 1-15. 7 wins already with 6 games to go, looks
like they will surpass your expecatations by a mile. Here's your
prediction in case you forgot:
<<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 175.10 NFL '91 Magazine Predictions 10 of 33
MAXWEL::CHILDS "sign said, Stay Away Fool.." 27 lines 18-JUL-1991 13:54
-< I got as much chance of being right as they do, >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1991 Insider Noter Sports Rag
NFC East NFC Central NFC West
---------- ----------- ---------
Giants 13-3 Vikings 10-6 San Fran 12-4
Philly 10-6 Bears 10-6 Saints 9-7
Cowboys 9-7 Packers 9-7 Falcons 6-10
Redskins 8-8 Tampa 8-8 Rams 5-11
Cards 4-12 Lions 7-9
AFC East AFC Central AFC West
-------- ----------- --------
Bills 13-3 Steelers 10-6 Chiefs 11-5
Colts 11-5 Oilers 10-6 Raiders 10-6
Dolphins 9-7 Bengals 8-8 Chargers 8-8
Pats 5-11 Browns 3-13 Seahawks 6-10
Jets 2-14 Denver 1-15
wildcards Philly over the Bears, Colts over the Oilers.
NFC Championship Giants over Frisco
AFC Championship Steelers over the Bills
Giants over the Steelers in the Bowl.....
|
36.422 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Wed Nov 13 1991 07:12 | 4 |
| So, the Donks are now 0 for the last 6 meetings with the Raiders. Is
that right?
lEe
|
36.423 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:22 | 8 |
| > So, the Donks are now 0 for the last 6 meetings with the Raiders. Is
> that right?
No. The Faiders have won the last 5 meetings.
Joe
|
36.424 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:47 | 8 |
|
yeah Joe. it's like freakin incredible isn't it. I mean I'm hardly ever
wrong about this things. Especially cause I use my head and not my heart
on these things.
;^)
|
36.425 | Squeelers = Worst team in NFL ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:52 | 13 |
| Childs..... You're a Butthead !!! ;^)
I can't beleive you didn't see that big time hold by the right
guard on the Faider TD.... It was huge !! I got a few more more
for ya too. The so called fumble on the three yard line was a
bunch of crap.... The man was down way before the ball came out.
Funny thing is I saw Uncle Al handing out 50's to the zebras just
before this happened. Then ther were the 2 big pass int calls, or
should I say non-calls that would have helped the Donks convert
important 3rd downs. IMO, the Zebras seemed like they came from
LA LA land insetead of Denver ! Why don't you wake up Mikey?
Big Game
|
36.426 | 1-15, you should know better than that | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Nov 13 1991 12:16 | 4 |
| From the looks of your predictions Mike, you might be on track for
1-2 teams. The rest look like you are off. The sqeelers going 10-6?
Its still possible, but unlikely. Maybe 6-10 would be more like
it;^^)
|
36.427 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | HELP SET PROFILE | Wed Nov 13 1991 12:27 | 8 |
| 5-0, huh? Thanks, Joe. I musta heard it after the game, instead of
before.
Hey, what's a few days matter, anyway? It's Wed, and that's almost
Friday, ain't it? :*)
lEe
|
36.428 | Boy it's times like this I really miss Uncle Hoot and the Parrot... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Cawowina Bwue | Wed Nov 13 1991 14:23 | 1 |
|
|
36.429 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Nov 13 1991 15:38 | 6 |
| re-1 I kinda miss them too (ugh). There were some faider faithfuls
in here last year and at the start of this season, but now that the
faids are 3rd in the west, the faithfuls vanish, kinda like Hal and
Gronowski. Carlos is an occasional exception;^)
Tim
|
36.430 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 13 1991 15:57 | 13 |
| GRACK! UGH! Groan! That was some kind of weird hard hitting
game. 'Bonehaid' awards were well deserved and deserving
candidates were plentifull but when it comes down to a 1 point
game it's easy to point the finger. I give an honorary Bonhaid
to uncle Al for his lip synch rendition of the 'F' word on
national TV. It was classic. TV showed a lot of pushing and
shoving. Spectators stated there was a lot of extraneous
activity also. One Raider was spoted with his helmet twisted
over his haid like his nose was poking out of the ear hole.
He riped that brainbucket off and they said he was some kind
of PO'd. Oh well, boys will be boys.
BoB
|
36.431 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Wed Nov 13 1991 16:09 | 13 |
| No doubt Bob. There was pushing after almost every play. This guy I
was sitting next to hadn't been to a donk faids game before, and I
told him this was normal for these 2 teams when head to head.
I was waiting for either Kay or Widell to get tossed, 'cause they
seemed to be in about half of the shoving matches, and I think it was
Kay that actually pushed a ref out of the way so he could inflict
damage to his hand by hitting a faider in the helmet. I thought for
sure that ref was going to point him in the direction of the showers,
but the ref just jumped right back into the action. I think some of
the refs like getting involved.
Tim
|
36.432 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Wed Nov 13 1991 17:18 | 10 |
|
the one that should have got tossed was Atwater. The kid is a great hitter
but he's also cheap. More than once he speared somebody late. I know on one
particular instance Craig wanted to rip into...
as for where was when and where BG, I was splittin time between this game
and the Giants game. Even as a Jints' fan I'd have to rate this game as
the better affair sunday...
mike
|
36.433 | Steveie is a good boy | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Thu Nov 14 1991 10:34 | 9 |
|
Mike... I can't beleive you are calling Atwater a Cheep shot. The
guy is a great hitter, as you said... But to call him a cheep shot
cause he came in late on one play is beyond me. I have been watching
him play since he joind the Donks and have never seen him pull
a really bad cheep shot.... Everyone goes a bit overboard at time
but only a few a cronic about it and Atwater ain't one of `em
Big Game
|
36.434 | Envious? | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Nov 14 1991 13:00 | 4 |
| Mikie just wishes the sqeelers had all pro safeties like denver does.
Denver has 2 of the best safeties in the league, IMO!
Tim
|
36.435 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Thu Nov 14 1991 13:10 | 3 |
| Agreed !! YOu know them damn Squeelers don't have no talent !!
Big Game
|
36.436 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | So, are we having a recession yet?? | Thu Nov 14 1991 14:30 | 5 |
| The best defensive backfield performer in the Steelers/Broncos game
will wear a Steelers uniform - Cornerback Rod Woodson. And you cain
take that to the bank (if you cain find one that's solvent...)
JD
|
36.437 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Nov 14 1991 14:57 | 9 |
| There is probably a fine line between chippy vs cheap vs intimidation.
The Raiders have always prided themselves on the intimidation factor
that they believe they hold over other teams. Denver has never
bought into their line of thinking. The intensity of this rivalry
had appeared to have been on the decline, that is, untill
last sunday. Maybe we get to see these two again this season.
That could be a good one.
BoB
|
36.438 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Bare It and Grin | Thu Nov 14 1991 15:43 | 13 |
|
>>The best defensive backfield performer in the Steelers/Broncos game
>>will wear a Steelers uniform - Cornerback Rod Woodson. And you cain
^^^^^^^^^
Uh, Er, HEY JD!!!!!
Wore, that should be "wore".
Da game was played a week and a half ago.
JaKe
|
36.439 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Thu Nov 14 1991 17:44 | 12 |
| I was just refering to safeties. Yes Woodson is very good, but he
ain't no saftey.
From what I have seen/heard, Philly has the most players that hit
late or are refered to as cheap shots.
I watched that Vike/Bear game the other night, and both Browner and
Felix Wright were constantly in late. Browner got caught 1 time, but
I don't remember Wright getting flagged, and he should have.
Tim
|
36.440 | yeah right Jack, the man's got a halo and wings | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Fri Nov 15 1991 09:56 | 9 |
|
I didn't mean to say Atwater was the only cheapshot artist in the league
just one of them that's all. Atwater is a vary good safety agains the run
but I've seen him get burnt a few times in pass defense. Most do from time
to time. Woodson is indeed a safety and better than either of the Donko pair.
BG your aggressivness is my cheapshot obviously...
mike
|
36.441 | Childs.... Go to school ;^) | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:49 | 14 |
|
Childs: What ??? Are you on the same planet.....
what is "BG your aggressivness is my cheepshot obviously" supposed
to mean... I've gotten out of the habit of reading Giberish since
DiNzMoRe laid off noting....
Atwater and Woodson are both good safeties..... Woodson has been
in and out of trouble all year. It remains to be seen weather or not
he can keep it together and remain on top. On the other hand....
Atwater is an all american boy who keeps his nose clean and plays
hardnosed football.... He is not cheepshot or even one of the
cheepshots in the league.....
Big Game
|
36.442 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:13 | 14 |
|
Well I see the Denver Refs have now become a road crew. Elway was over the
line and the sham with the clock was a disgrace but hey hey atleast you guys
were kind enough to ship your refs to us in the meadowlands where they bailed
out the Jints....
and I still say Atwater is cheap...
FWIW though I did bet denver $$$$$$ ;^) and turned my local saloon owner
onto that as a better pick than the Jets. who shouldn't have escape NE alive.
;^)
mike
|
36.443 | reply = joke | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey you're pretty good... NOT! | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:59 | 3 |
| Yeah Elway received a gift. He was at least 2 yards past the marker.
Mike
|
36.444 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:12 | 7 |
|
No doubt about it. Elway was past the line. Are the refs
trying to make a statement? I saw similar things in the
Giants-Cowboys and Browns-Oilers games (plays that should
have been reversed but weren't).
Claybone
|
36.445 | Good game, as always! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:17 | 39 |
| Denver has a great defense, but lack in coaching when it comes to
pressure. Why in the ____ did they go to prevent at the end of the 1st
half and the end of the game? They let KC march down the field almost
3x (3rd time game ended) and gets 10 points???????? They should have
stuck with blitzing and better zone!!! GET A CLUE REEVES AND
PHILLIPS!!!
I couldn't believe Wymon. He was actually in the middle of 2 ints.
He got the 1st and then defended a play which in turn had Brooks catch
the bounce of Wymons hands. Wymon also kinda saved the game when he
tackled the reciever in bounds on what ended up being the last play of
the game! I'm in shock!!!
The offensive line is still a problem on pass blocking. Yes KC has
one of the best pass pressure D's, but Elway was sacked 6x. That was
almost critcal since 1 sack took them out of FG range and then the
center ended up muffing the snap for the punt and thus giving KC position
in Denver territory on KC's last TD.
Elway is Gawd! Most every team would love to have him!
And I never saw Atwater on any cheap or late hits! Actually I think
Atwater hasn't been as present as in the 1st 5 games. Yes he had an
INT yesterday, but DeBerg overthru his reciever by 5yrds. The only
thing that could be causing this is maybe the DL is doing better and
Atwater and Smith for that matter do not have to come up and be the
ones stopping the running plays like they used to.
Denver just needs to win in Seattle and its cruise mode from there.
It will be tough. I thought they would lose to KC and proved me wrong,
and maybe they can win in the girly-mon dome, but unlikely.....
The KC fans at the stadium throwing bear and all sorts of stuff on
the Broncos as they left with the win suprised me and also showed no
class on thier behalf!!!!!!!!
Tim
|
36.446 | We'll take it; Thanks for nothing, Seachickens | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:43 | 52 |
|
> Well I see the Denver Refs have now become a road crew. Elway was over the
> line and the sham with the clock was a disgrace but hey hey atleast you guys
> were kind enough to ship your refs to us in the meadowlands where they bailed
> out the Jints....
Yes, Elway was over the line, but only if that marker we were looking
was the official line of scrimmage and not just a visual aid. That may
have been a factor in the review. From what I've heard, if any part of
a player's body is over the line, he is considered over the line of
scrimmage (i.e., not where the ball leaves his hand or where his feet
are). But like I said, if that was officially the line of scrimmage,
he was over. But bottom line is: Broncos win! (HAHAHAHA)
> The offensive line is still a problem on pass blocking. Yes KC has
> one of the best pass pressure D's, but Elway was sacked 6x. That was
> almost critcal since 1 sack took them out of FG range and then the
> center ended up muffing the snap for the punt and thus giving KC position
> in Denver territory on KC's last TD.
And on a couple of Elway's sacks he was still beckpeddaling when he was
sacked. That's bad. But on the other hand, their run-blocking is very
good this year. That sack that took them out of field goal range
really ticked me off. The only worse that could've happened in that
situation is a turnover. They should've just run the ball there or
have Elway roll out and have a run/throw option. And when Horan fell
on the bad snap I though that was the beginning of the end.
> Denver just needs to win in Seattle and its cruise mode from there.
> It will be tough. I thought they would lose to KC and proved me wrong,
> and maybe they can win in the girly-mon dome, but unlikely.....
I also thought Denver would lose at KC but I'm glad I was wrong! A win
at Seattle next would just about wrap up the divison, but a loss
won't be all that devastating. I expect Seattle to win next week.
As for defense, I agree again. More blitzing, especially from Croel.
I can't believe they made Vlasic look like Montana on his first drive
in the game by giving him all that time to throw. You get a new QB in
the game, you harass him - I thought that was common sense.
> The KC fans at the stadium throwing bear and all sorts of stuff on
> the Broncos as they left with the win suprised me and also showed no
> class on thier behalf!!!!!!!!
Yea, they were pretty bad, but the Broncos were just lovin' it. I
thought that was funny. Many of them were giving the fans the chop.
But I though the only classless fans in the country were in Boulder???
:^) :^)
Joe
|
36.447 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | N.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptus | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:02 | 8 |
| � The KC fans at the stadium throwing bear and all sorts of stuff on
^^^^
You wonder how security let these people take the bears in the
stadium in the first place! Now I suppose the Animal Rights Activists will
get involved and everything... What a mess!
/Don
|
36.448 | | CAM::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:36 | 3 |
| /Don,
Perhaps they were blowup bears....
|
36.449 | Donks about to wrap up AFC west !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 18 1991 15:08 | 25 |
|
No question Elway was over the line.... I don't care if it was a
visual aid on the sideline... I saw where they snapped the ball
from and it was outside the 29.... Johnny was well beyond that before
he started his wind up. I like the way he answered the question posed
after the game... He says something like Well, I thought I was behind
the line or I wouldn't have thrown the ball... You could see him just
wanting to bust out laughing... He knows he got away with one. all
and all I think the Donks played a good game..... Running the ball
well, coming up with big plays when they need to and not putting the
ball on the carpet. The thing the Donks need to carry them into the
playoffs with a chance at winning anything is get the offense in gear.
The D is playing well.... The O on the other hand is only scoring
when they have to. We need to learn to ice a game ala the Bills and
Skins..
Go Donks....
Donks 21
Seachickens 17
Big Game
|
36.450 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Nov 18 1991 15:32 | 23 |
| I thought youze guys knew I cain't spel.....Actually, I have this
shirt that is Bear Beer. It has this bear standing towards a snow
drift showing that he just rents the suds. Bought it over in Manitou
Springs. I would wear it to work, but it might offend prospective
customers that are always touring thru the plant;^
Yes Elway was over the line! On KC's last possesion, the KC guy
was tackled in bounds on one of the last plays, but yet the ref signals
out-o-bounds and stops the clock. I think thats why the refs had the
10 second run off on the play after, since I didn't see a KC player hurt
like in the spots/soilers game.
When KC got thier last touchdown, it was obvious and right in front
of the ref that the KC reciever pushed off the denver DB in order to
get open and catch the TD.
I must say, the officiating sucked in all 3 games I watched yesterday!!
I couldn't watch all of the night game, 9 hours of football is a bit
much, plus the wife was tired of it......Can't always win;^)
Tim
|
36.451 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 18 1991 15:41 | 20 |
| Alot of bad calls yesterday. Despite what Childs says, that 10 seconds
wasn't bogus. Not to mention the one Tim just talked about (I think it
was the previous play) where the receiver was clearly down in bounds
right in front of the Denver bench. Didn't catch that pushoff by the
KC receiver on the TD though.
That Dallas game was really bad in the first half. The Giants' drive
where they scored a TD and eventually went up 13-3 was a joke. First
there was that mystery pass interference call, then the holding call
down at the goal line which would've been 4th down. Madden couldn't
get over that one either.
And how about that interception by Cleveland with only a couple minutes
left in last night's game. Took them a long time to make a call, and
then they called him out of bounds. Did they end up reversing that one
and giving him an interception? I flipped back to a movie before they
decided.
Joe
|
36.452 | Really need to do something about this crap | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 18 1991 19:07 | 14 |
| I say lynch them "Damn Zebras"..... Hasn't been a good game
called in weeks..... Seriously, I don't remember a recent season
with so many bad calls/non-calls by the friggen Zebras.......
These guys should be on the pay for performance plan like we're
supposed to be here at DEC.... A bad call costs you some $$$
when nexted(tm) years salary planning goes on.... Oh yea, I
forgot they're in ther Damn union !!! No wonder their calls
stink, they don't have to worry about losing their jobs !
Big Game
DONKS RULE !!!
|
36.453 | | DECWET::METZGER | Everyday is like Sunday. | Mon Nov 18 1991 20:47 | 22 |
|
These guys are part time employees with "better" full time jobs. I know John
Hendry has waxed poetic on why the NFL doesn't have full time referees but
if the recent trend continues I see no alternative then to get full time
employees....If the WFL continues these guys could do WFL games in the spring
and summer and then do NFL games in the fall/ winter. Mebbe that would be
enough work for a full time officiating crew....
Right now they stink and are getting worse...I've always been an instant replay
advocate but it's losing me this year with the inept way they're using it. Too
many times I've seen calls reviewed on meaningless plays (and wait, wait, wait
for the guy) and other times seen crucial calls not get a glance.....
I still think that they could make better use of it if it was an appeal by the
coach instead of a guy in a booth. If the coach looses the reversal they lose
a timeout, if they have no more timeouts they lose 15 yards or so....
Make it strategy instead of insipidness....
Although I watched very little football yesterday...
Metz
|
36.454 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Nov 19 1991 08:38 | 31 |
| Just remember one thing - with the "better" full-time jobs a lot of
these guys have, the NFL would either have to pay them a hell of a lot
more to keep many of them, or risk losing them and have worse
officials. Bad as many of you may think they are, they are the best
football officials there are and if the NFL has to bring in a crop of
new guys, things will be worse for a while. That's a more scary
thought for me than what we have now.
Even with working WLAF games in the spring, at the current pay scale,
they'd lose a lot of guys. There are half as many WLAF games every
week so they'd only need half as many officials to work the WLAF games
anyway. Some NFL officials did work the WLAF games - it was mostly the
newer guys although Stan Kemp, Bernie Kukar and Larry Nemmers - veteran
officials who got promoted to referee this year - were referees in the
WLAF. I'll also still maintain that with the amount of work these guys
put in during the off-season and between games, there really isn't that
much more work they can do during the season than what they are doing
now. I also believe they will get stale with doing absolutely nothing
but film work and rules study without games to work more than once a
week. None of this is a "paid political announcement" by the NFL
either.
Part of the problem is the changeover from Art McNally to Jerry Seeman
as Director of Officiating. With any new boss, there are going to be
changes in doing things and some of the guys who've been around for a
long time probably aren't feeling quite as secure as they used to. I
think that's being reflected in the officiating.
I also agree with dumping Replay.
John
|
36.455 | Last night was another example of Zebras stinking up the place | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 19 1991 10:38 | 10 |
|
I like replay.... I think it adds to the game when used correctly.
I think Metz hit it on the head..... Make it a strategy thing. I
see no reason to let a bad call go by the way side when we have the
means to reverse it when need be. Dumping replay does exactly that.
Keep replay... but make some needed adjustments. Metz's ideas seem
like a good place to start as far as I'm concerned !
Big Game
|
36.456 | | GENRAL::WADE | Gimme the beat boys | Tue Nov 19 1991 11:54 | 11 |
|
I don't know Metz. I saw at least 3 calls that should have
been overturned by replay. They weren't. And you want to
assess them a timeout or something? No way.
I don't think giving them "X" number of replay reviews per
half would work. You can't say the refs will blow ONLY
that many (especially when the Clemson refs are working
the Donk games right Mike Childs!).
Claybone
|
36.457 | Ramblings of a Donk fan | NEXUS::SALZER | | Tue Nov 19 1991 15:07 | 13 |
| OK. The cover is blown. Denver is in 1st and everybody sees them now.
If I was a Bronco, I'd of gotten up yesterday morning and kicked
myself once again for loosing 2 weeks ago in a coulda-shoulda-woulda.
I knew the pass play would be the center of argument but that's not
what blew the game for KC. Pulling DeBerg and having Mark Vlassic
attempt to lead you in a winning drive iced it for Denver.
So now it's Seattle and that doesn't look too bad but who knows?
Does anyone know why Clarence Kay remains on this team?
24 points sunday was the most scored on KC this season.
BoB
|
36.458 | Mis December of SI...oh yeh! | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Tue Nov 19 1991 16:07 | 11 |
| I like replay if its used correctly, but now that there seems to
be so many problems, then maybe they should throw it out! I thought
the replay guys have 2 minutes to review it or the play stands. If
this is true, when will it be enforced?
I'm not sure of the playoff scenarios yet since there are 5 games
left. I do think that at least 2 AFC west teams will meet in the
playoffs, but who? If Denver is in it, then I hope its in Denver. I
wouldn't mind going to another game this year.
Tim
|
36.459 | | DECWET::METZGER | Everyday is like Sunday. | Tue Nov 19 1991 17:50 | 10 |
|
Another thing you gotta do is get rid of the replay official who's an ex-nfl
official. Hire some dude who's got two eyes and an attitude that he doesn't
care if he pisses off the old farts on the field by overruling their calls.
:-)
only 1/2 kidding,
Metz
|
36.460 | another good point by Metz !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Wed Nov 20 1991 11:48 | 1 |
|
|
36.461 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Thu Nov 21 1991 15:54 | 12 |
|
Elway's shoulder is hurting. He's questionable for Sunday.
He took a cortisone shot Monday and didn't throw yesterday.
What slim hopes of a Super Bowl Denver has will vanish if
he isn't 100%.
Bobby Humphrey decided to skip practice/meetings yesterday.
He's got a *personal* problem which added with his severe
lack of PT has him unhappy. Reeves is giving him some time
off to mull over his future.
Clayboone
|
36.462 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Fri Nov 22 1991 11:03 | 16 |
| Humphrey is back at practice. He will sit out this weekend. This
boy better figure out what he is doing, or his future could be in
question.
Elway will start sunday. Look for Shawn Moore to be activated just
in case. I wouldn't mind seeing him play instead of Kubiak, if Elway
goes out for whatever reason.
The denver defensive line will have to control this game in order for
the Broncos to win IMO. If Krieg isn't pressured, then he will pick
apart the def backs. He has always had a good success against Denver.
Denver by 2.......Point spread is 3, I thin Bobbalou
Tim
|
36.463 | Bet The Farm...... I did ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 11:27 | 6 |
|
NEWFLASH!!!!!!!
Donks CRUSH Seachickens..... WIN 2nd game in Dome this year...
BIG GAME
|
36.464 | Three way tie...come Monday! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Fri Nov 22 1991 14:32 | 8 |
| Elway and Humphrey are both a couple of crybaby-mama's boys, send
Humphrey over to the Raiders so that they can make a man outta him!
And send Elway out to pasture.....he's washed up.
Look for Krieg to set new records this weekend, and give Elway a
quarterbacking lesson.....
Carlitos :-)
|
36.465 | Get off the Whisky !! ;^) | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 14:54 | 16 |
| Carlitos....
What are you on dude ???? ELway a cry baby... The man hasn't
missed a start since 88 or 89. He's one tough hombre... I mean
who else (QB's) runs the ball into the endzone like a RB, sholder
down and everything. As far as being washed up goes You had better
open you eyes and look a bit closer to home. Anyone who has Wrong
Way Jay for a QB should be real careful about critizing other team
QB's. The day Dave "It's been years since we've had a winning record"
Kreig gives Elway a QB lesson will be the day Wrong Way Jay gets the
Faiders past the first round of the playoffs. Look for the Donk
Defense to dominate this game and Elway & Co. to have their finest
offensive outing this year aganist the mighty Seachickens
Big Game
|
36.466 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Fri Nov 22 1991 15:25 | 6 |
| Yeah...but...Wrong Way did get them past the first round just last year
against the mighty Bengals. And another thing, wasn't biff originally
called Wrong Way Elway..(amongst other fine nicknames like Mr. Ed.)
.....how did Schroeder inherit this?
Curly-Toes!
|
36.467 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 15:30 | 8 |
|
I knew that would be misunderstood.... I mean
they've never had a win past the first round with
wrong way.
Big Game
p.s. If the Shoe fits (ie: wrong way)
|
36.468 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Fri Nov 22 1991 15:37 | 13 |
| I don't recall Elway having the "wrong way" nickname. He has been
called Mr. Ed, Biff, canon arm and of course Gawd......
I see that its getting close to the end of the season, and the faids
might get into the playoffs, so now Carlos wants to rile everyone up,
and it just might work.
Maybe it has something to do with the "what others think of sports
topic" where someone said that the faids/donks bashing just hasn't been
the same since hootsie and parrot left. Carlos tries, but he seems to
be the only faider faithful left.
Tim
|
36.469 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 16:38 | 10 |
|
Carlos has put forth a valiant effort but falls far short of
filling the shoes of the Great Uncle Hootsie... That guy and his
parrot were so one sided and caught up in the faider BS that they
couldn't see the forest for the trees... With a little practice
Carlos may reach the afore mentioned status but it will take
great effort and commitment. Good luck on your journey to becoming
a legend in your own mind, Carlos....
Big Game
|
36.470 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Fri Nov 22 1991 16:59 | 8 |
|
I'll never forget Hoot asking: "Is Officer Perry going to
play?" I was giggling all day. The Parrot was overrated
IMO. He just rode on Hoot's coattails hence the nickname.
Claybone
ps Carlos does a fine job representing the Raider scum! :^)
|
36.471 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:06 | 10 |
| Thanks guys....I think....
I missed most of the Hoot & Parrot show. I was just coming in when they
were going out, too bad, I coulda learned alot from those guys (on how
to rile you Donks I mean) and it sure would be nice to have an ally or
two, ....in all fairness 'though Mr. Childs knows how to get under your
skins, and he cracks me up every once in a while, thanks Mikey, and
keep up the good work.
Carlitos
|
36.472 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:20 | 10 |
| > but he seems to
> be the only faider faithful left.
See, they are getting this conference cleaned up.
:^) :^)
Joe
|
36.473 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:45 | 1 |
| AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Raider SCUM !!!!
|
36.474 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | You say you don't want it... | Fri Nov 22 1991 17:54 | 2 |
| The Parrott was way overrated. I remember one night at the Dub where he
was acting like such a jerk that even Hoot was annoyed.
|
36.475 | Seachickens 13, Denver 10 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 11:09 | 14 |
| The defense is getting better and the offense is getting worse. Elway had
hardly any time to throw yesterday and was sacked 5 times as the offense
scored a whopping 3 points. They had a first and goal at the 6 but had to
settle for a field goal. They had 2 late drives into Seattle territory but
couldn't convert on 4th down. And now Mark Jackson, the 2nd best receiver on
the team, could be out for the rest of the season. Last week in KC the
offense got 3 turnovers to work with but only managed 17 points.
Despite a pitiful first half, Denver had numerous chances to win a game I
expected them to lose. Now they probably can't lose more than 1 game the
rest of the season if they are to win the division.
Joe
|
36.476 | caugh, gag, or anything else you can call it | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Mon Nov 25 1991 11:36 | 21 |
| I thought both defenses played ok, but the teams seemed to be
"disoriented". Elway should have been yanked. He had 2 ints and 2
fumbles in the 1st half!! He was obviously in pain and had a hard
time throwing the ball. Kubiak couldn't of hurt the team anymore than
Biff.
Mark Jackson had the game winner go through his hands and off his
gut. I'm not sure if he would of held onto the ball after that monster
hit!
Denver had a prime chance yesterday to be tied with Houston for 2nd
best record in AFC, but they choked. Actually all the division
leaders choked yesterday, and now the FAids have the AFC west lead
since they owned Denver in tie breakers. Denver has lost 3 divison
games.
I don't see Denver getting past the 1st or 2nd round of playoffs with
the offense lacking as they are!!!!
Tim
|
36.477 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Mon Nov 25 1991 11:55 | 8 |
|
> Mark Jackson had the game winner go through his hands and off his
> gut. I'm not sure if he would of held onto the ball after that monster
> hit!
my favorite highlight from the game....
;^)
|
36.478 | Donks in a battle for their playoff life for the rest of the season | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:34 | 19 |
|
The donks just couldn't pull of the magic yesterday. I have never
seen the blow so many chances to win a game late in the 4th like they
did. Elways was hurting but that is not what cost them the game.
Their running game has been what made them successful all season and
it was not there yesterday. The Donks needed that win and couldn't
pull it out. Look for a real battle for the title in the west this
year. with 3 left the donks need some help from the Faids to be
assured another title. All around another tipical AFC West battle
in the King Dome...
Go Donks
Big Game
P.S. Thanks a bunch to the Clowns for beating K.C. Although the way
K.C. played they could have beaten themselves W/O much help.
|
36.479 | OUCH! | FRETZ::HEISER | donderfliegen! | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:55 | 3 |
| Re: Robinson's hit on Jackson
We felt the tremors down here!
|
36.480 | Elway was a cause! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:43 | 7 |
| If Jackson is out, then what for? Cracked ribs or sumthin like
that?
Mike, do you like seeing people get hurt? I didn't even think you
were that bad.
Tj
|
36.481 | Thigh-shuddering pleasure ! :-) (tm) | LUNER::BROOKS | Too legit ! Too legit to quit ! | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:49 | 1 |
| Great hit n the endzone on Mark Jackson !
|
36.482 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:51 | 4 |
| Jackson suffered a dislocated right wrist.
Joe
|
36.483 | A little light in the loafers? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Nov 25 1991 14:15 | 4 |
| So he's basically gonna be walking around with a limp wrist like the
rest of the team huh?
|
36.484 | Donks need to take a long hard look ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 25 1991 15:23 | 35 |
|
Here we go !!!
Jackson was not injured from the hit. The heat the Elway put on the
ball is what caused his injury. The ball was slightly deflected by
the defender and hit Jackson in the wrist causing it to bend backwards
and become slightly dislocated. He will play nexted(tm) week, count on
it. I've always liked Jacksom because he is the toughest receiver the
Donks have. Still, I beleive the ball should have been caught. It
was only slightly knocked off track by the deflection.
The issue I have is that this game should have never come down to
Jackson making this catch. The offense was totaly worthless yesterday.
with the field position that the Donks had through out most of the
first half they should have routed the Seachickens.
I beleive that another reason the Donks lost is because they didn't
make the correct adjustments at half time to counter act the pass
rush from Seattle. They should have begun to set up the run with more
1st down passes... Just some real short (3 to 5 yrds) shots to the
backs and T.E.'s would have done the trick. This would have opened
up the running game by spreading the defense. Reeves it very bad at
making adjustments to his game plan when required in the middle of a
game. He also has the motivational talent of a hangman.
In short, we can blame this Donk loss on the total lack of offense
which was caused by an injured Elway and some poor play calling. Like
I said earlier, with the field position the Donks had in the 1st half,
this should'nt have even been close.
The Donks better pull their respective you no whats out of the dirt
nexted(tm) week against the Pats or the same thing will happen in
Mile High that happend in the Kingdome this week.
Big Game
|
36.485 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Mon Nov 25 1991 16:58 | 6 |
|
Of course I don't like to see people hurt Tim but I do love to see Donk
receivers drop GAME WINNING TOUCHDOWNS....he dropped the ball before he
was hit in case you missed it.....
mike
|
36.486 | I agree with much of what you said, BG | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 17:09 | 42 |
| > I've always liked Jacksom because he is the toughest receiver the
> Donks have. Still, I beleive the ball should have been caught. It
> was only slightly knocked off track by the deflection.
Jackson is definitely tougher than Vance or Nattiel, but I would say
Young is their toughest receiver and also their most dependable go-to
guy. As for the ball being caught, it may have hit him right in the
stomach but when someone waves a hand in your face at the last minute
that makes it a very difficult catch, even if he didn't tip it.
> The issue I have is that this game should have never come down to
> Jackson making this catch. The offense was totaly worthless yesterday.
> with the field position that the Donks had through out most of the
> first half they should have routed the Seachickens.
Yea, that's the tough part. The defense is not only playing well enough to
win, but they're playing well enough to where Denver would be beating
people by 3 TD's every week with any type of decent offensive
production. Hell, outside of the Houston disaster (which was credited
mostly to field position, turnovers, and special teams blunders) the
most poinst Denver is 20 against KC last week.
> I beleive that another reason the Donks lost is because they didn't
> make the correct adjustments at half time to counter act the pass
> rush from Seattle.
As much as Denver has been blitzed in recent weeks, you would think
they could either come up with (1)some way to slow down the pass rush
or (2) some way to burn the blitz. Hint: the screen pass. Oops, I
forgot. A successful screen pass doesn't exist in Denver's playbook.
> They should have begun to set up the run with more
> 1st down passes... Just some real short (3 to 5 yrds) shots to the
> backs and T.E.'s would have done the trick.
This is the way I've felt for the past couple of seasons. That is so
much of what the Niners use - a 2 or 3-step drop by the QB, and he
knows exactly where he's going to throw the ball before the snap.
Those passes are almost impossible to defend.
Joe
|
36.487 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Mon Nov 25 1991 18:17 | 21 |
|
Joe,
You're right about Young.... I guess I was caught up in the
old Three Amigo crap. Young is tougher than Jackson and makes
the big play when needed. Young reminds me alot of Steve Watson.
Tough, Slow and wide open.
I watched the replay 3 or 4 times and swear that the ball caused
the injury to Jackson. It looked as though the ball bounced off of
his hand bending it backwards and then hit him in the gut. The "HIT"
seemed to put Jackson down on his back/side not on the wrist, I won't
swear to this in court though. I am sure that the local rag will have
all the details today...
I don't understand the lack of the S.F. style short passing game in
Denver especially with the blitz being a big factor in their offensive
woes. The Niners useed that style very successfully and I think the
Donks could do the same.
Big Game
|
36.488 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Mon Nov 25 1991 20:09 | 13 |
|
> I don't understand the lack of the S.F. style short passing game in
> Denver especially with the blitz being a big factor in their offensive
> woes. The Niners useed that style very successfully and I think the
> Donks could do the same.
It's simple Big Game just look at the respective personel and coaches...
Rice and Taylor are big receivers who can catch the ball on the quick
slants in traffic because they are big enough to muscle out of the pops
off the line etc...it also helps that Joe has a bit more touch than Biff...
mike
|
36.489 | Keep that train a rollin' | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Nov 26 1991 09:24 | 8 |
| Ya hoid it hear first:
Pats 17
Donks 14
Fryar too tough to handle. Revenge will be sweet
MikeL
|
36.490 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Tue Nov 26 1991 10:32 | 9 |
|
Well, this'll be a first, but I agree with ya Mikey C. BBJ
would drill holes in his receivers in a short passing game.
Elway's shoulder isn't getting any better. The only
prescription for the tendonitis is rest. Look for him to
take a day off soon (ie a game). He also has a bone spur.
Claybone
|
36.491 | Donks in Must Win Game This Sunday At Mile High ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Clean Environment Means Better Beer | Tue Nov 26 1991 11:21 | 26 |
|
Things are looking tough for the Donks down the road. Elway
is beat up and like Clay said he ain't getting any better. The have
to play the Pats who are coming off of a big win and always play the
Donks tough. Mark Jackson could be out for nexted(tm) weeks game
and if he does play he'll surely not be 100%. The offense is struggling
badly and shows no sign of recovery (kinda like the economy). This is
the time for a real gut check for Mr.Ed and the Donks. Look for a
close one in Mile High this weekend.
Donks 21
Pats 17
The short passing game is a must for Denver if they are to get the
offense rolling again. Elway has shown in the past (Yea thats right
Mikey...) that he can play this kind of football. After all, that
was their bread and butter when their running game was non-existent.
I don't beleive they have to entirely depend on the S.F. style offense,
only use it to break open the running game. Mr.Ed is at his best when
the Donks can run the ball. He gains complete control of the field,
the defnese can not possibly cover all of the options he presents
when the running game is on.
Big Game
|
36.492 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:34 | 28 |
| Young is toughest reciever. With Jackson going down, this means
the vance will get more playing time, and thats good. Like his
attitude or not, vance can catch the ball, and isn't affraid to go
over the middle, he's just chicken on punt returns!
The play calling is REeves' fault. He is calling most of the plays
again, and when its 1st down, and you run up the middle, well
eventually that gets REAL predictable!!!! I agree with the 3-5 yard
dump offs, and with Reeves being a DAllas boy, you think he would use
alot of that, like maybe to Perryman or Greene.
Look for the Pats to be fired up this week, after all they did bump
off the AFC leader last week, and would love to do it again to a
division leader. Heck Dick probably has his guys thinking they still
have playoff possibilities;^)
Denvers defense will have to get the turnovers for the offense so
the offense can score the usual 16 points.
Denver 16
Pats 10
Tim
|
36.493 | happy T Day Boy & Girls !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:56 | 5 |
| Well, This is my last day till Monday.... Just wanted to
have a great thanksgiving everyone... I know I will, I'll be skiing
all weekend in Crested Butte....
Big Game
|
36.494 | | FDCV07::KING | Be nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!! | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:00 | 6 |
| Hey Big game is goin' BUTTE SKIING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REK
In the rockies, where men are men and women are men.. And it's kinda
hard to tell them apart with all that ski stuff on.. :-}
|
36.495 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:10 | 3 |
| I thought the Rockies were where men are men and sheep are scared.
John
|
36.496 | Ski Resorts :== Many, Many Women and some are even pretty !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:14 | 8 |
|
Not true REK... Lots of fine "Ski Bunnies" out on them there
ski slopes.....
Ninj, You got the Rockies confused with Wyoming...
the line goes "Wyoming, where men are men and sheep azre scared"
Big Game
|
36.497 | | DECWET::METZGER | Everyday is like Sunday. | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:18 | 12 |
|
Have a good time in Crested Butte, Big Game. We just had our major areas out here
open up in time for the thanksgiving ski holiday. Unfortunately I'll be going
back east for Bird-day but I'll get my skiing in over the rest of the year.
Anybody ever been to Tahoe? Bruce on Sissy Sports? My little brother just
moved there to become a ski bum for the season and I'd like to visit him this
spring for some turns. When would be a good time to go?
Metz
|
36.498 | Raiders #1 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:24 | 10 |
| >>Look for the Pats to be fired up this week, after all they did bump
>>off the AFC leader last week, and would love to do it again to a
divisi>>on leader.
Yeah.....but...everybody knows that the Raiders are the division leader
Tim, where you been? :-)
Carlos PS You didn't really think I was gonna let you get away with
that did you?
|
36.499 | Watch out for them Texan women! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:29 | 25 |
| re-1 I was hoping you didn't catch that.
Jack, Is it still free at Crusted Butt? They had a deal down there
where tickets are free so all you pay for is lodging. I wanted to go,
but I'm still lacking the lodging & partying funds...booo
Its suppose to snow on T-day.....Have fun!! And.......
Break a leg;^) Couldn't resist.....
Tim
|
36.500 | | CSC32::P_PAPACEK | | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:14 | 5 |
|
I think the free lift tickets are till the 14th/15th. But don't quote me
on it.
Pat
|
36.501 | Eastern skier>Western skier 8^) | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:22 | 13 |
| Tim, -1
Watch out fer them Texan wimmin is right. Last year I took a trip
to Breck,Copper, etc. and at the airport(Denver) saw a bevy of Western
bedecked goddesses wif deep drawls. Come to find out they was a
goin' to Vail to meet their husbands who all were in the oil bidness.
A thief coulda retired with their jewelry (dadgum Texan rich felines).
And of course they had great fun wif ma Boston accent ( don't y'all
ski little hills in Bahston). Felt like doin the Texas Two-Step raght
in der faces!
MikeL
Whose gonna try ta ski at Sunday River or Killington this weekend
|
36.502 | Should be fun.... Could be alittle crowded though !h | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:36 | 16 |
|
Carlos... You pretty quick big guy... Can't slip nothin past
you can we ?? ;^)
Tim, The Skiing is free until the 15 of December. Crusty Butt
has about a 34 inch base last I heard with more on the way come
Thursday. Just for future reference, We got a condo for 3 for
$80.00 a night, not a bad deal... The place has the standards,
fire place, nice kitchen, hot tub, heated pool and a Rec area
with pool tables and a bar. I you're looking to go let me know and
I'll give you the name and number to get in touch with those
Yah Hoos in Crested Butte.
Big Game (Who Can't wait to bust out his new K2 KVC Kevlar Skis
but not on this trip... not enough snow)
|
36.503 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:13 | 5 |
| re-2 Instead of the 2 step, maybe you should of told them to show
you the Texas couch dance;^) I haven't seen it, but I was told its
rather um interesting.......
Tim
|
36.504 | don't need extra help gittin' in trouble | CTHQ3::LEARY | Better than LDS | Wed Nov 27 1991 08:49 | 5 |
| Texas couch dance? I woulda gotten slapped upside the haid by these
wahoos as well as my wife who was a standin' right next to me.
MikeL
|
36.505 | Ouch! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Wed Nov 27 1991 13:04 | 5 |
| Oh, I didn't know you had the little lady with ya.....But ya never
know about the other gals, they may have said somethin like, sure
where is there a couch and closed door;^)....
Tim
|
36.506 | Go Pats! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Wed Nov 27 1991 15:09 | 9 |
| Isn't an ex-donk assistant coach now coaching for the Pats? I seem to
remember the announcers mentioning something about that during their
first game earlier this season. He said something about this coach
knowing Elways (and the rest of the teams) strenghths and weaknesses,
and how best to attack them. Anyhow the first game was a close one that
the Donks lucked out on, because of an in-experienced QB making a fatal
mistake. I had a chance to go see it in person, but I'm glad I didn't.
Look for more of the same this weekend. Will Biff be playing?
|
36.507 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Nov 27 1991 15:18 | 6 |
| Joe Collier, Stan Jones, Myrel Moore and Charlie West, who made up the
bulk of the Denver Defensive coaching staff through the 1988 season,
make up the bulk of the New England Defensive coaching staff this
season.
John
|
36.508 | Play Moore! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Wed Nov 27 1991 15:45 | 3 |
| I'm sure Elway will play. Ole' Danny wouldn't want it any other way.
Tj
|
36.509 | tsk, tsk after THIS GAME, no comment.... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | DSA = Drood(tm) Supporters Anonymous | Sun Dec 01 1991 21:24 | 1 |
|
|
36.510 | It should heat up in here this week ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:18 | 20 |
|
Well the donks offense seems to be begining to round the bend
and get back on track. The defense is playing the best I've seen
in some time. I realize that the Pats are far from the best team
in the league but they did just hammer on Luckaolo lasted(tm)
week. Denver didi it part to stay in the hunt for the AFC west
title. It's just to bad the the Faiders lucked out and slipped by
the Chargers. Can't wait til nexted week. The Donks are gonna crush
the Clowns and the Faiders will be soundly trounced by the Bills.
What more could a Donk fan ask for besides an SB win... ;^)
Big Game
Donks 27
`Spots 10
|
36.511 | Raiders Rule! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:38 | 5 |
| Somebody please wake Big Shame up, he's dreaming again! Hey Big Game,
Bernie's gonna be your new hero after this weekend. Him or Schroeder.
:-)
|
36.512 | Donks = 1991/1992 AFC WEST CHAMPIONS ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:42 | 13 |
|
In your dreams.... The Donks will stomp the Clowns into the dirt
and if Luckaolo does'nt beat the Happless Faiders by at least 10
pts I'll take a trip to the Crow Cafe on their behalf. Like I said in
the Donks topic... Look for the Donks to finish out the season 3-0
and the Faiders to go 1-3. Donks have the West all but in hand.
And with an Eagle win tonight have a shot at first round home field
advantage.
Go Donks
Big Game
|
36.513 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:42 | 21 |
|
Elway didn't know if he was gonna play until Sunday morning but he sure
looked sharp. Russell's getting better every week. Defense also looked
good although Croel and Powers were out. Denver had some opportunities
for some more points but hurt themselves with turnovers or penalties.
Anyway, they looked pretty good and actually won easily and I got to
relax in the 4th quarter for once. Heck, I even turned over to the
NO-SF game at the end - what a wild finish that was.
> Can't wait til nexted week. The Donks are gonna crush
> the Clowns and the Faiders will be soundly trounced by the Bills.
I'm definitely excited to see Luckalo whip the Faids and put them in
their place. I don't care for the Bills but I'll certainly root for
'em against Iraq. I don't know about the Denver-Cleveland game though.
I still think Denver will lose one of their 2 remaining road games and
this could be it. Cleveland still has an outside shot at a wildcard too,
so that should give them more incentive.
Joe
|
36.514 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:43 | 1 |
| That should read Faiders topic....
|
36.515 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:20 | 20 |
| Denvers offense looked better 'cause Elway called most of the plays
this game. He called ALL of the plays in the 1st 2 series. I liked
seeing something other than run up the middle on 1st down.
I don't think Denver will stomp the spots, but they have a very good
chance at winning. I agree with Joe, cleveland has some incentive and
might be prepared.
Denver will win as long as Kosar is presured. Elway (if he plays)
always finds a way to get the points that are needed, against the
spots anyway.
Denvers defense is the best that I've seen in awhile!
I loved that CB blitz by Tyrone Braxton. That is something that
I haven't seen Denver do much of. They usually send LBs.
Thats probably why the Pats offense didn't even look for him. Keep it
up Wade.
Tim
|
36.516 | Really, The 8th is my B-day, Send money to cxo1-1/p22 | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 03 1991 15:07 | 11 |
|
D O N K S # 1 SLAM CLOWNS ON MY B-DAY !!!
What a great present that will be !!
Big Game (Who's 29th will be complete with a Donk POUNDING of the
`Spots)
|
36.517 | I wish the pats were playing the donks next year | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 04 1991 08:13 | 7 |
| So the Mighty Donks Swept the Patriots... Big Deal, remeber that first
win came on a very dump QB error. I wont call it good luck by the
donks, more like bad luck for the NE pats. The Pats suc(# last year
due to not have the right personal, whats the donks excuse. The pats
will be in the Playoff hunt next year and may even make it. See you
nexted time...
mab
|
36.518 | Marty was to BLAM! | TALLIS::CIMNET::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Wed Dec 04 1991 09:54 | 10 |
|
> Denver will win as long as Kosar is presured. Elway (if he plays)
> always finds a way to get the points that are needed, against the
> spots anyway.
Elway always put up enough points against Marty.. But he hasn't managed
in the last 2 meetings, now, has he?
/Jeff
|
36.519 | Wake up and Smell the Coffee ;^) | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:05 | 23 |
|
The first game the Donks lost this decade to the firggin Clowns
was the Battery game where the entir face of the game was turned
by the totaly out of control fans in cleveland. When a team is driving
for a score and the fans are allowed to cause such disruption in
the game that the Zebras have to switch ends of the field you can
hardly say the 11 men on the field stoped the drive... Maybe the
12th man in the stands being a complete drunken jerk.
The second game the Donks lost was last year, in mile high. They
just plain lost this game with a bit-o help from the zebras as well
with a BS pass int call and some well timed holding calls as well.
I would hardly say that domination and to say that the fact that
Marty left is the reason the Donks have lost the last 2 in just plain
wishful thinking. The have dominated the Clowns over their entire
history of playing, not just in the Marty era... The DOMINATION
WILL CONTINUE !!!
Go Donks
Big Game
|
36.520 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:20 | 9 |
| FWIW, the "switch end-zones" game was in '89, which only makes the
Browns 1-0 against Denver this decade. Actually, the '89 AFC
Championship game was played in January of 1990 so the series is
actually even at 1-1 for the 90's. Oh, wait a minute, Brown fans don't
consider the AFC Championship game to be a big game, so I guess that
one doesn't count.
Joe
|
36.521 | Clowns by 11... | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:04 | 10 |
|
Hey Jack, with all this talk about refs it occurs to me you'd make a great
TarHeel fan....
and all thisd huff and puff about Biff is just that. The bum has beaten
one winning team this year and hasn't thrown for over 200 yards in his
last 6 outings...and this supposed to be GAWD in a football uniform?
hashahahaaaa
mike
|
36.522 | The usual garbage of the week! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:14 | 15 |
| Biff threw for over 200 yards against the pats last Sunday.
Also, I don't remember Marty losing to the Broncos in the 89-90 AFC
champeenship game. He was in KC already, if my "great" memory serves
me right. Elway was not calling many plays the last 6 weeks, thus
the always predictable reeves was stopped.
Mikey, you darn well know you would love to have elway on the
squeelers squad. He is better than booby and o'ducko......
Tim
|
36.523 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:23 | 8 |
|
no Tim, I seriously wouldn't. His Td to Inty ratio stinks bigtime. Sure
he can run and sure he can throw the thing 80 yards in the air but he
cannot read defense and has no touch whatsoever. I'd rahter have Hugh
Millen.....
He's a headcase, he's overpaid and he's a whinner...No thanks you keep
him....
|
36.524 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:19 | 7 |
|
Childs... If I thought you had a clue about what the Zebras
are supposed to do I might get offended by your tarheel remark.
The Donks got ripped by the Zebras and the drunken `Spots fans
last time in Clevescum. It won't happen again !!
Big Game
|
36.525 | Belichick 2x Marty, 4x Carson. | CIMNET::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:32 | 10 |
|
Gawd bless, big game is still bitchin' about a meaningless game played
2 1/2 years ago..
What is Marty's lifetime record vs. the Donks as a head coach? Does he
even have a win against them?
I rest my case.
/Jeff
|
36.526 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:40 | 3 |
| Marty's only win against Denver came last year in KC.
Joe
|
36.527 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:44 | 10 |
| What, I can't talk about one of the most outragous things to
happen durring a game of football... You clowns fan are still
raving about the victory !! Give it a rest !!
Big Game
The Donks will even Belichick's record come Sunday and end the Lowly
Clowns season at the same time !
|
36.528 | | CIMNET::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Thu Dec 05 1991 08:54 | 8 |
|
Small_Brain, noone's raving about that victory, we're only using it to
offset your insistance that the Donks own the Browns.. When if fact
the Browns have won 2 of the last 3. Make it 3 of 4 after sunday.
Can't wait for you to eat some serious crow come Monday Morning.
/Jeff
|
36.529 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:33 | 8 |
|
And what about you... It will make my week to see you Bellie up to
the Crow bar for a nice cold serving of the Black Bird. The Clowns
can't win this game... they just don't have the talent to pullit off.
;^)
Big Game
|
36.530 | Even up says Vegas. | CIMNET::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:46 | 9 |
|
Fine, fine.. but you will be hard pressed to find any outrageous
predictions I've made regarding the game, Unlike your assertions that
the Browns don't even belong in the same league as the "mighty" donks.
If I'm forced to visit the CC I'll be sampling, I won't be gorging.
/Jeff
|
36.531 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Dec 05 1991 13:47 | 8 |
| This game worries me. I'm fairly certain the Broncos will win
it. My concern is having Denver go out onto the field in front
of thousands of fans who I believe genuinely hate them. This
game has a very real potential for fan violence. Bronco fans
know that they have not hesitated to show that hand before.
It's a shame. It really is just a damn game.
BoB
|
36.532 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Dec 05 1991 14:21 | 22 |
|
/Jeff,
I know... You're right. If the donks lose I willhave much more
of the Black Bird to eat that you. This is the one time of the year
that I can't help myself and things just fly off the ends of my
fingers before I can stop them. Ask Groaner and Hal about that.
Both have made at leats as outragous comments about this game as I
have. At any rate, This is big fun for me and if I have to swallow
some crow as the price then so be it. I really don't think that
the Donks will lose this, no matter what happens. I do hope how
even that if the fans in Clevescum get out of hand that the management
and zebras have the balls to do something about it for once. It really
sucks what they are allowed to get away with. If the `Spots management
had any cajones at al the would make sure that those in violation of
good fansmanship be ejected never to return. the sad thing is that
they encourge this kind of crap instead of taking a stand like Da
Bears !!
Big GAme
|
36.533 | Don't read the last line Jack | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Thu Dec 05 1991 15:56 | 16 |
| Since I won't be here tommorrow, (Gunnison business tommorrow and
Crested Butte on Saturday) I will get my 2 pennies in now!
The Browns are goin down, Bernie to have int, Atwater and Smith
to put a hurt on Hoard and Mack, and Elway to throw 2 TDs plus run for
1.
And if that don't happen, who cares, 'cause the Broncos win by 3 or
more.
I hope that the fans won't be "involved"!! If so, fine the Clevland
org for not taking proper security measures.
Party at Big games house, he's buyin' the brew ;^)))))))
Tim
|
36.534 | Kindler gentler Browns fans.. | CIMNET::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Thu Dec 05 1991 16:17 | 6 |
|
I kinda remember watching a game in Denver where the opposition got
pelted by 20K snowballs while attempting a fieldgoal and at other
points in the game.. or at least I think I remember...
/Jeff
|
36.535 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Stardate 12.06.91 - BE THERE ! | Thu Dec 05 1991 16:23 | 4 |
| Yep ... Ray Wersching of the NIners missed a FG because he nearly got
plunked by a well-timed snowball in the first half.
The Niners lost by 2, if memory serves me right.
|
36.536 | Browns by 7 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Thu Dec 05 1991 17:42 | 5 |
| I hear mama's-boy is getting estrogen shots in his shoulder. What a
wimp, the Donks should put him out to pasture. :-) This is probably his
last mediocre year, than Moore will replace him in the spring. Maybe
he'll take notes this weekend from a QB who knows how to play the game.
|
36.537 | That fan got tossed from the game! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Thu Dec 05 1991 17:44 | 10 |
| That is correct. The niners lost, and all these niner fans started
crying about "if he would of made it the 9rs would have won". In the
same breath, the broncos (reeves) had the usual 1st and goal on the 2
and tried 4x to punch it in, and of course couldn't. The donks were
ahead at that time, thus the reason of 4 tries at a TD. If the niners
would have made that FG, then reeves would not have gone for the TD,
when he was "almost" assured of a FG. So the outcome would have been
no different IMO.
Tim
|
36.538 | | URQUEL::SALZER | | Thu Dec 05 1991 19:49 | 8 |
| Yes it was 1 (as in one) snowball, not thousands. In fact since
that event stringent security measures have been in place. In
fact I was at last sunday's game and a fan was immediatelly dismissed
for throwing a snowball. He obviously didn't understand the
the rules that the fans must live by there. Cleveland's stadium
seems to operate by a different standard.
BoB
|
36.539 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Dec 05 1991 19:49 | 9 |
| No Tim... That fan lost his season tickets.... you won't
see a bs org like Clevescum do that though.... they thinks
it goodness..
Big Game
Elway has a much better record than Bernice will ever have that Cajones
to dream about... Screw the stats... Who's been to the Bowl.!!!
|
36.540 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GE Bowl? | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:24 | 4 |
| Gee, I wish every football team had fans as polite and mannerly
as those Bronco fans.
/Don
|
36.541 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Dec 06 1991 17:37 | 14 |
| /Don nobody said they are polite and mannerly. In fact it can get
real testy at times. The thing is, there has to be an understood
level of what's acceptable behavior and what's not. A large crowd
emotionally charged and an element of that crowd intoxicated
is a dangerous mix. Denver has figured a way to control quickly
and effectively. You screw up and you pay the price. Nobody is
a faceless member of the masses that can act without being held
accountable for that act. I was hoping one of the Browns group
would take me to task or assure us that my opinion of Cleveland
stadium antics is one of needless paranoia. That hasn't happened.
Hopefully the Broncos will have them heading for the exits early.
That will make all of this a moot point.
BoB
|
36.542 | Ha! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Why ask why? Because thats why! | Mon Dec 09 1991 08:14 | 18 |
| All in all this was a good win (not to ugly) for the Broncos. They
clinch a wild card and also 1st place in the west since the faiders
CHOKED!!!!
Elway had a decent day. He "basically" gave Clevland their only
points. He overthrew some recievers, and alot of recivers dropped
balls. Biff came right back after the INT and drove the Broncos to a
TD.
The offensive stat that sticks in my mind is only 2 TDs and 6 FGs in
the 1st QTR. This says what most of us has seen, which is the
Bronco offense doesn't get "motivated" until the 2nd QTR.
The offense is showing up for the 2nd half this year! That is a +.
The defense is GREAT!!
Tim
|
36.543 | | CAMONE::WAY | Say no to Baby Butt Crack | Mon Dec 09 1991 08:53 | 12 |
| > All in all this was a good win (not to ugly) for the Broncos. They
> clinch a wild card and also 1st place in the west since the faiders
> CHOKED!!!!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that Denver was 10-4 and LA 9-5.
It's possible they could still end up tied, in which case LA has the
tie breakers, or LA could still win it.
At least that's the impression I had....
'Saw
|
36.544 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Dec 09 1991 10:01 | 4 |
| They have clinched a wild card but have not clinched the division
title.
John
|
36.545 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Hit & Run Noter at Large | Mon Dec 09 1991 10:57 | 9 |
|
Saw you missed Tim's pause in there. He meant that it put them in first
for this week not the season. Although effectively they should be a lock
for first with their wimpy schedule while the Raiders play tough opponents.
If anyone choked yesterday it was Norwood not the Raiders. Raiders' mistake
was going into prevent offense too early...
mike
|
36.546 | The Domination Continues !!!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:19 | 45 |
|
YES !! YES !! YES !!
Just what the doctor ordered for my B-day... The Donks look like a
team inspired in the 2nd half. (I missed the first due to a birthday
brunch planned W/O my knowledge) All in all a good game for the Donks.
the defense in taking control of ball games early. The offense in not
what it could be but they are getting the Job done. A 10 pt victory
over the `Spots is no small feat considering the level to which this
rivalry has risen over the past few years. The special teams need to
work on coverage though... things looked a bit thin at times and the
Clowns did have some good returns on them. Treadwell's confidence
should have been boosted after yesterdays outing. He no trouble and
nailed the coffin shut with the 4th quarter field goal. The Donks
are heading into the playoffs playing better than they have all year.
I am looking forward to a good showing in post season. Maybe not a
Superbowl but a good showing none the less.
I hope the Faiders never get rid of Wrong Way Jay... I was sitting at
the folks house watching the game with my Dad (He hates the Donks,
calls `em the luckiest team he's ever seen. (he's from Ohio)) and I
tell him the Jay will throw an INT and cost the Faiders the game.
Sure enough, right after Luckaolo ties it up old Wrong Way Jay comes
out a throws a big time INT. Yes old sure foot from the Bills missed
the kick but it could have cost them. It goes into OT and I say,
whatch, He'll do it again and he does. `Bout this time the old boy is
coming out of his chair, it was too funny. At any rate, as long
as Jay is playing for the Faiders they will never win a championship.
The guy reminds me of Danny White in the 2 minutes. And as for
Luckaolo... I wouldn't be surprised to see Norwood gone before the
S.B..... If not, he could cost them big !!
Donks ROOOOLLLLEEEEE !!!!
`Spots Sip In Public
Al Davis is kicking himself for ever letting Beureline go to Dallas
Big Game
P.s. I'll be pulling for the `Spots this week. They'll probably drop
the game against the Soilers on purpose just to get back at the
Donks.
|
36.547 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Scott Norwood Fan Club | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:26 | 31 |
|
> If anyone choked yesterday it was Norwood not the Raiders.
Childs, don't kid yourself. When you have a 2-touchdown lead with 5
minutes to play at home and lose, that's a choke job, plain and simple.
You gotta love the way the Denver D is playing now. They've only given
up more than 20 points all season and that was the disaster at Houston.
They're getting great pressure on the QB, and Croel and Powers are out
right now. It's a good thing that they were constantly pressuring
Bernie yesterday or else he would've gotten the Browns into the end
zone a little more. The Browns should've kept using Mack yesterday -
he was running right over the Bronco defense. The one TD the Browns
did score came after an interception at the Denver 37.
The offense was decent yesterday, but they came through when they
needed to in the 4th quarter. The most impressive thing about
yesterday is that Denver didn't run the ball well but still had a
couple nice drives and managed over 35 minutes of possession time.
Now if Denver can win their last 2 and get some help from Cleveland or
the Giants (Houston's last 2 opponents) they will have a bye the first
weekend of the playoffs. That would mean alot. Denver should wrap up
the division next week by beating Phonyix at home while the Faids go to
Nawlins and get whupped.
GO SAINTS!!!!!
GO BROWNS!!!!!
Joe
|
36.548 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 09 1991 13:25 | 22 |
| Yes I did say denver is in 1st place in the west. Is that not where
they stand today? Sure they could choke and lose the division, but
not likely, and they are in the playoffs, this is all I stated. I
never said that they won the division.
Denver does have a light schedule, but thats what happens when you
finish towards the bottom of the conference. Don't worry Mike, the
sqeelers will get the cream puff schedule next year, and the jints for
that matter.
Elway calling plays = better play mix!!
Denvers running game has been lacking the last 2 weeks! The spots
defense did a good job of shutting the run down. I feel Humphrey may
have helped, but who knows.....
Denver better not take this next game lightly, 'cause look at what
the cards did to the 'skins yesterday. They had a 14-0 lead just to
lose it 20-14, but they did scare the 'skins none the less.
Tim
|
36.549 | The Domination Continues !!1 | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 09 1991 13:34 | 21 |
|
Tim,
I agree on both points.
When Elway is calling plays the team seems to have a completely
different look. Notice the short passes, The use of Sewell as
a wide out. Sweeps when the middle has been closed up. John
is begining to show what he's really made of.
The Donks running game has been vurtually non-existent the past 3
weeks. If they plan to take another shot at the Superbowl they had
better get that fixed. Maybe Bobby would help. He should be getting
close to being able to play and should be given a chance if Greene
can't make things happen.
Donks Will Win West !!
Big Game
|
36.550 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Day at a time | Tue Dec 10 1991 16:11 | 6 |
| jack,
do you work in the clean room there?
dinz
|
36.551 | Cleanrooms are a gass to work in though !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 10 1991 17:04 | 6 |
|
Used to long ago... Work as a systems guy in Materials Acq.
now. Got a real office and everything... (about 5 years now)
Whats the point !!
BG
|
36.553 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Day at a time | Tue Dec 10 1991 17:33 | 2 |
| I tried to call ya..
|
36.554 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Tue Dec 10 1991 18:22 | 8 |
|
Hock,
I know Dave. However, I work out here in da woods at the
FCC site so I don't see too many folks.....jest squirrels
and deer and such.
Claybone
|
36.555 | Another Classic !! Many ;^)'s | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 10 1991 18:31 | 14 |
| Claywad..
Is that what happened to you ??? I was wondering why I hadn't seen
your UGLY face around here in a while.. Well, it's a good place for
ya. We can't have customers seeing you after that nasty accident you
had with Big Bertha, her twin sister and the Blender...
Kawk... I know neiter of these so called friends of yours. Maybe I'll
look `em up to see if the exsist or are only a figment of a sick mind
in need of a labotomy(sp?)
Big Game
|
36.556 | | CSLALL::TIMMONS | THEY MUSTA SEEN ME AT THE Y! | Wed Dec 11 1991 07:14 | 10 |
| Big Game, I was out there almost 7 years ago and did a tour of the
Clean Room on 1st shift. You musta been there. I was the guy who was
going crazy, cause I couldn't breath and I had an itch I couldn't
scratch because of them darned suits. :*)
Worked a project with a guy named John Pritchard, he was a tech on the
repair line. Nice guy. Wonder if he's still around there? Also, I
used to work with Russ Hamel, he's in Quality.
Lee
|
36.557 | | CAMONE::WAY | I believe I'll dust my broom | Wed Dec 11 1991 08:22 | 10 |
| Hey, be nice to Claybone.
He's one of the Brotherhood, so if ya mess wif him, ya mess wif me.....
But I'd love to hear more about that blender deal.....8^)
'Saw
|
36.558 | watch out for them poachers Claybone... | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Dec 11 1991 09:27 | 14 |
| Russ is still around. He's a manager now doin' sumthin on the RA9x
or small form factors....
I have heard of the other guy, but don't know him by name and face.
All of the clean rooms are busier (sp?) than ever, at least until the
RA9x moves to Germany. To my knowledge, the RA8x, R31, R35, and 2.5"
disk drives will be the only ones left. I have heard about a 1.8" disk
drive coming in June. I guess its the size of a pack of ciggs.
I haven't met Claybone yet, but I would like to hear about this
blender incident.....Sounds "interesting"
Tim
|
36.559 | It's a true story and would make a great horror movie ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Dec 11 1991 11:26 | 14 |
|
LeE,
Russ is still around... I don't beleive that John work at Dec
any longer. At any rate, you must have toured the manufacturing
cleanroom to be hanging out with those guys. At the time (7 years ago)
I was working in the engineering cleanroom doing media qualifications
for new products. In that type of environment you don't get many
visitors if you know what I mean, Pretty hush hush.
As for Big Bertha, her twin and the blender, I'll leave clay to tell
ya about that one. ;^)
Big Game
|
36.560 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Wed Dec 11 1991 12:15 | 30 |
|
lEe,
John Pritchard isn't at CXO anymore. I don't know if he's
still with DEC.
Tim,
IF YOU WOULDA WENT TO JAKE'S FRIGGIN' GET TOGETHER YOU
WOULDA MET ME YOU GAVONA! :*)
You're almost as bad as JoJ!
I don't have to worry about poachers. The joggers and
mountain bikers keep 'em away. I did see some mountain
lion tracks on the trail that runs through the valley.
After finding the nearest big stick, I hightailed it back
here.
Jack,
Ugly? You oughta know. You're so ugly that when you were
born, the Doc slapped your mother! :*)
'Saw,
Thanks for the help, but I really don't need it with the
likes of these girlymons like Jack.
Claybone
|
36.561 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Wed Dec 11 1991 12:18 | 7 |
|
Oh, and about Big Bertha, her twin, and the blender.......
Nobody saw me do it. Nobody heard me do it. Nobody took
pictures of me doing it. I didn't do it! ;^)
Claybone
|
36.562 | Bow-wow brown cow | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:05 | 10 |
| Broncos hit a nice trifecta sunday. They beat the dogs on their own
turf, locked down a playoff spot, and with compliments to the Bills
took over first place alone. This all comes as a big surprise to me.
Anti-Donks around the area are probably begining to feel some heat
already. Yes the bowl performances have been dissapointing, but they
sure have squashed a lot of other's plans along the way. A Broncos
Bills game for AFC Championship does have a nice kind of ring to
it. Let's see what happens.
BoB
|
36.563 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:23 | 14 |
| I'm like JoJ? Gee thanks, 'cause I have met him ;^) I would have
made it to Jakes get together, but my excuse as to why has since left.
The reason why I said poachers is because they caught some guy
between DEC and Pinon Valley with 6-7 deers in the back of his truck.
The dumbsh$% told someone over at the Rock about poaching in that area,
and some engineer from here overheard him, and told security who then
informed the game commision and then sure enough, he came back to do it
again, and the game people surrounded him and had airial shots to prove
his guilt. Thats when they caught him with the 6-7 deer.
I guess he is spending time in Canon city.
Tim
|
36.564 | | GENRAL::WADE | the buck of the Irish | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:48 | 18 |
|
Well, out here, all you'd need to get a deer is a cookie
and a hammer ;^)
re. Elway, HoF, from the Giants note
It won't break my heart if he doesn't make it. He has
entertained this Bronco fan to no end and won more games
than he's lost. That's all that matters to me. Well, OK.
Maybe he could win a Super Bowl for me too. :^)
His highlight reel would be long. Everything from "The Drive"
at Cleveland to his many "escape the rush and complete a 60
yard bomb" plays.
I'd vote him in but I'm biased.
Claybone
|
36.565 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 16 1991 10:54 | 28 |
| The Denver Post headline says it all: "A Cardinal Sin...Almost"
Ain't that the truth. If Denver would've lost that would've clinced
the bye for Houston and given the Faids a better shot at winning the
division. Denver can still get a bye for the first weekend of the
playoffs if the Giants beat Houston Saturday and Denver beats San
Diego. Denver will win the AFC West tonight if the Saints beat LA
tonight.
The AFC West title will be nice, but it won't mean a hell of a lot
unless Denver can beat out Houston for the bye. Denver is assured of
playing their first playoff game at home, they just don't know if it
will be the first or second weekend of the playoffs.
Back to the Phoenix game. Denver had some chances to put more points
on the board in the first half. When they had that 3rd and goal in the
2nd quarter I don't know why they just didn't run a QB sneak. And I
think they should've gone for the TD on 4th down.
Denver got pretty banged up yesterday. Perryman is out for the season
and many other players got minor injuries.
Go Saints!!!
Go Giants!!!
Joe
|
36.566 | Typical bronco nail biter. | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 16 1991 11:04 | 21 |
| John finds a way to win despite 3 ints. He was responsible for 9
card points. The fumble that Atwater caused was bogus, Denver should
have gotten the ball, thus taking the last 3 points away from cards
and denver never losing the lead.
Denvers offense looked good at the start, but then didn't take
advantage of opprotunities.
Defense played well as usual.
Injuries are key here:
Perryman out, Sewell, Meck,Russell,Dimry, Lang, & Traylor.
I thought I saw Montgomery limping as well, but he wasn't reported
aas hurt in todays loco rag......
After faids lose tonight, the division is a lock!
Tim
|
36.567 | Are you ready for some football? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Dec 16 1991 11:58 | 10 |
| Keep dreaming Tim, the Raiders are gonna come marching in tonight!
I think the Raiders showed everybody last week that they could outplay
the best in the league (even if they lost), just like I think the
clueless Donks showed everybody yesterday just how pathetic they really
are! Can't believe this team is even in the playoffs. Forget winning the
Division, the Donks are gonna hit bottom next week against the
Chargers, and then they'll go on to choke against their first playoff
opponents guaranteed!
Carlos
|
36.568 | good game for them | DESERT::HEISER | wise men still seek Him | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:05 | 1 |
| I watched yesterday's game. The Cards looked almost competent.
|
36.569 | If Faids are within 10 tonight it'll be a miracle | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:12 | 6 |
| RE .567
SSDD
Joe
|
36.570 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 16 1991 14:41 | 18 |
|
What A Game... !!!
I was at Pile It High yesterday to watch the Donks come through with
another in a long line of BIG wins. The Donks played a great game and
had to endure many bad calls by the Zebras. The Cards were fired up
and were playing with the mind set that they had nothing to lose. When
the fumble by the Cards was ruled down I thought the Zebras were in
deep do do so to speak. The Stadium went nuts. It was so loud you had
to scream to the person next to you. This was really a bad call and
showing it on diamond vision and the park may not have been the best
idea. The Donks are a lock for the Divison now, There is no way the
happless Faiders can win this game with wrong way jay at the helm.
Look for the saints to blow the faids out in N.O.
Big Game
|
36.571 | Who was that other team?!?! | COMET::SCOTTJ | | Tue Dec 17 1991 07:48 | 10 |
| RE.568
Carlos I'm new to this conference and maybe I'm newer to football than
I thought, but with a final score of 27-0, yes the big goose egg zero.
It looks like those Faiders of yours just showed up for their own
funneral...Yes No... I mean a team that can put only 102 yards of
offense on the board and no points, well I wouldn't be bragging all
that much. Tell me what do you think!!!!!!!!
Jim
|
36.572 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Dec 17 1991 08:35 | 8 |
| The Broncos win the Western Division. The Broncos will have a first
round bye with a win over San Diego on Sunday coupled with a Houston
loss to the Giants on Saturday. The Raiders and Chiefs will play each
other back-to-back, with the winner on Sunday hosting the wild-card
game and the winner of the Jets at Miami game playing at either Houston
or Denver.
John
|
36.573 | | CAMONE::WAY | I believe I'll dust my broom | Tue Dec 17 1991 08:43 | 9 |
| Interestingly enough, I think it was Frank and Al who were talking
about the difference between being the 3rd Division winner and the
1st WC.
I gather there isn't much, because you both play on "wild card weekend"
and you both play at home....
'Saw
|
36.574 | Read 'em and weep, Faider fans! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Broncos: 1991 AFC West Champs!!!! | Tue Dec 17 1991 09:57 | 20 |
| RE .573
Yea Saw, that's what I was talking about in one of my earlier notes.
If Denver doesn't beat out Houscum for the bye, the division title
doesn't mean anything more than pride. If Houscum wins Saturday,
Denver's game against San Diego on Sunday will be totally meaningless.
> Keep dreaming Tim, the Raiders are gonna come marching in tonight!
HAHAHAHA! Hell, they couldn't even march into Saints' territory. The
only time they were in NO territory was after the blocked punt.
Faiders ran only FOUR plays all night in Saints territory. Faids are
lucky it wasn't about 47-zip.
> Forget winning the
> Division,
Yea, Faiders can forget it now!!!!!!!!
Joe
|
36.575 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:03 | 8 |
| All right, all right.....I'll take my crow with lots of ketchup please.
What a suck that was last night, the Raiders bit it big time. Congrats
to the Donks for winning the division, couldn'tve happened to a nicer
team. I still say they'll be out of it after the first round though.
After last night's performance I wonder if the Raiders will do any
better?
Carlos
|
36.576 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:44 | 3 |
| The Raiders threw the game last night. They'd rather play KC, NY
or Miami insteadof Houston in the playoffs.
Denny
|
36.577 | HHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:48 | 15 |
|
D O N K S RRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLEEEEEE !!!!
Nice to see the real Raiders show up in NO lasted(tm) night.
The Donks once againg prove their dominance over the AFC by
putting together a tremendous run for the title after last years
debachle of a season. Them damn raiders really cost me.... I
bet a buddy they'd lose and then when he started whining at half
time about how the Zebras were gonna steal the game from the Faids
I felt sorry for him and went double or nothing that the Faids
didn't break 100 yrds total offense... A measly 2 yards cost me
$20.00. At any rate, Go Broncos.... !!!!!
Big Game
|
36.578 | The 100 years old Evans did better than Jay! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:51 | 20 |
| Well at least you belly'ed up to the crow bar Carlos!
Denny, I think your graspin' bud, I mean the faids choked in every
way possible. The faids fan that was at my house last night was still
saying that the donks better hope they don't play LA in playoff's
'cause they'll lose again, and I don't see that, not with Jay at the
helm.
Faids were gettin hurt last nite. how many injuries did they end up
with?
Somethin tells me that the soilers will beat the now hapless jints,
so denver will most likely play the fish/planes winners.
I wouldn't be suprised to see denver lose at SD this weekend. Now
that the division is won, Elway may get his much needed rest for his
shoulder.
Tim
|
36.579 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Broncos: 1991 AFC West Champs!!!! | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:53 | 22 |
| > The Raiders threw the game last night. They'd rather play KC, NY
> or Miami insteadof Houston in the playoffs.
The game didn't really mean a whole lot to the Faids, but there wasn't
any chance they'd play Houston even if they won. If they had won, it
only would've kept their division title hopes alive, adding a
possibility that they would've played the Jets/Miami winner.
Well, Denver's race for the bye week really takes on extra meaning now.
First, there's the issue of getting a week off to give some of the
injuries a chance to get better. But there's also the issue of having
more time to sell playoff tickets. 30,000 season-ticket holders have
decided not to purchase playoff tickets, meaning those tickets will
need to sold 72 hours before game-time to lift the blackout. If Denver
doesn't get the bye, those tickets will need to be sold by Wednesday or
Thursday of next week or else we won't be watching the Broncos here in
the Springs. If the game is blacked out, the blackout would take
effect in a 100-mile radius of Denver. A Bronco home game hasn't been
blacked out in 22 years.
Joe
|
36.580 | Donks on way to 5th bowl and a victory !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 17 1991 13:54 | 6 |
| Joe... Never happen !! Those ticket will be gone faster than you
can say "Bernice is a Loser". Donks tickets themselves are a hot
commodity... Play off tickets will be even hotter. You can bet this
guy will be there !!
BG
|
36.581 | Fans Abandon Hapless Donks - Film at 11! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RedSox,Broncos,MoriaLasch | Tue Dec 17 1991 14:40 | 1 |
|
|
36.582 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Dec 17 1991 16:08 | 3 |
| Yea Right !!! Dream on !!!
Big Game
|
36.583 | At least I can relax this weekend | BSS::JCOTANCH | How are the Faiders doing? | Mon Dec 23 1991 11:51 | 20 |
| First of all, many thanks need to go out to the Jints for giving Denver
a chance to secure a bye for the playoffs next week. And the Broncos
didn't let that chance get away, although they tried.
Defense was superb as has been the case all season, but they did have
two badly timed letdowns that kept San Diego in the game. SD didn't
have a first down all half, but with about 4 minutes left in the half
Denver let the Chargers promptly walk down the field and cut the lead
to 10-7. Of course, the Broncos should've had more than 10 points, but
that's the way it's been with their offense. Then, Denver appeared to
take control with a TD late in the 3rd quarter to go up 17-7, but on
the ensuing drive the Chargers were again allowed to walk down the
field and get another easy TD. At least they managed to hold on for
the win.
Now if the Chiefs can upset Luckalo after putting the Faiders out of
their misery....
Joe
|
36.584 | Great Win By The Broncos !!! Go K.C., Jets !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 23 1991 12:21 | 11 |
| Great game by the MIGHTY DONKS... Once again they prove they can win
when the moneys on the table. Great Int by Atwater, This guy was a
god send to the Donks defense. Charles (Toast) Dimry show some signs
of life yesterday and could very easily have had 2 int's. Elway and
the offense better spend the next 2 weeks playing catch. I haven't
seen so many poorly thrown balls and dropped passes in a dDOnks game
since lasted(tm) year. The Donks are Going to the Bowl !!
Watch out Luckaolo... Here come the Broncos !!
BG
|
36.585 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 23 1991 12:44 | 15 |
| I agree Jack, Elway looked bad, and when he did get the ball there,
the recievers were afraid to catch the potato.
Wymon got hurt...toooooo bad! I don't like to see people get hurt,
but thats what it took to get him outta the game. Dimry was doing
just as bad for a while, but did better at the end. I would like to
see Lang in there.
Fletcher gets snubbed for pro-bowl again, and yesterday he proved
that he shouldn't have. He is better than Connly? from Buff.
Denver won't go all the way, but they just might be in Buffalo in 3
weeks.
Tim
|
36.586 | Post Season, Donks 0-1 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Dec 23 1991 12:50 | 8 |
| If they barely managed to pull out a squeeker against the worst team in
the division, they don't have a prayer of getting to the big dance. I
think the only team with a winning record that the Donks have beat are
the Chiefs (twice)? It's easy to look good when you play against the
worst teams in the league, let's see how well they do against real
teams! Donks are going down in their first playoff game, guaranteed!
Carlitos :-)
|
36.587 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 23 1991 13:02 | 8 |
| Well you are right about the winning record bit Carlos, but at least
we didn't lose to the Chargers.
The Broncos have a very tough schedule next year 'cause they are a
1st place team. They may end up looking as bad as the faids did this
year, but time will tell.
Tj
|
36.588 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Dec 23 1991 16:02 | 7 |
| >> They may end up looking as bad as the faids did this year,
They'd be so lucky, unless this team does extremely well in the Plan-B,
and draft, they will more than likely end up where they were last year,
the bottom of the division where they belong...Haaaaha!
Carlos
|
36.589 | Donk = AFC WEST CHAMPIONS... Faiders = Wilde car, barely !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Dec 23 1991 17:28 | 28 |
| Carlos,
As much as I hate to contrdict a fellow Donks fan (Tim) the truth
is that over the corse of the season the Donks have played a tougher
schedule, percentage wise than Luckaolo. I posted the numbers last
week I think... The were somewhere in the neighborhood of;
Team Winning percentage of opposing teams
-------- -------------------------------------
Luckaolo .380 something
Denver .450 something
Soilers .489 something
Also, don't forget that the Donks had something to do with the fact
that thos teams they beat don't have winning records.
Yea, the Donks will have a tough schedule next year. there can be no
doubt about that. But, They have won the AFC West and The AFC coming
off of a first place finish in the past and surely could do it again.
The Donks should do well in plan B, they've really turned around the
draft and plan B process and have made some steller pick in both the
past few years.
FWIW
Big Game
|
36.590 | Bowland's pockets deeper than uncle Al's... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang! | Tue Dec 24 1991 08:35 | 13 |
|
Carlos, don't ever bet against the Donko's advancing in the playoff
despite less than spectacular talent. Elway's usually good for pulling
a horseshoe out his butt and Reeves constant crying and bemoanings to
ref usually result in a + penality situation call in favor of the Broncos...
If there's any justice in the world, Wrong Way goes into pile_it_high and
trashes the MIGHTY_LUCKY_LIVING_ON_A_GIFT_SCHEDULE_DONKS�!!!!!
mANY ;^) MERRY CHRISTMAS AND CONGRATS JACK, TIM CLAYWAD ETC. you guys go
we stay home... ;^(
|
36.591 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 24 1991 09:21 | 5 |
| � Also, don't forget that the Donks had something to do with the fact
� that thos teams they beat don't have winning records.
And of course Buffalo didn't have anything to do with the poor records
of their opponents.
|
36.592 | Sat/Sun good days | RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 30 1991 11:55 | 7 |
| Houston @ Denver, could be a good game, but again weather will have
alot to do with it. Just like Dallas @ Chicago, 60 degrees and not
much wind from what I saw (Other then on a couple FG attempts). If
Houston can get so lucky as to have a very warm mild day in Mile High
I think theyll beat the broncos.... Well have to wait and see...
Mab
|
36.593 | Kinda like a Jints-Cowboys game | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:05 | 4 |
| Houston-Denver
This is another onea those games where it's too bad somebody has to
win!
Denny
|
36.594 | Faiders did just that! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:08 | 16 |
| This should be a good game. If Denver presures Moon, then the
oilers will have a rough day. If there is not alot of presure then the
Denver defense and Elway will have a long day.
Weather is definitely a factor. I don't think the weather is going
to be bad, but maybe I'm wrong. It shouldn't matter though, 'cause if
Denver has to rely on crappy weather to beat a team, then I will
question their abilities to just beat a good team.
I hope Denver beats the soilers just to keep everyone quite about the
donks "can't beat a winning team".
Look for a 20-17 type of game, with of course my biased opinion of
Denver winning.
Tim
|
36.595 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:13 | 8 |
| > Houston-Denver
> This is another onea those games where it's too bad somebody has to
> win!
When you talk about it being too bad somebody has to win, last year's
AFC Championship game comes to mind for me.
Joe
|
36.596 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:29 | 4 |
|
So, is the game Saturday or Sunday? Early or late?
Claybone
|
36.597 | Get with the program, Clay :^) | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:56 | 4 |
| Saturday, 2pm MST. Blackout should be lifted.
Joe
|
36.598 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 30 1991 15:53 | 11 |
| Still 7,000 tickets left.......If they black it out (which is
unlikely), then I'll be heading to the Dublin house. I'm sure they
can get it off the Satelite.
I am suprised that there were so many tickets left. Normally they
are snatched the 1st day. I have a chance to go and a ticket lined up,
but then $$$ are short, and the wife isn't pleased about her not
having a ticket. Someone from the ski team has the ticket, but will
be in Steamboat Springs this weekend.
Tim
|
36.599 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:09 | 6 |
| Wow,
7,000 tickets left in Mr Edsville? That's unheard in that
football-rabid country. What gives?
MikeL
|
36.600 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:09 | 10 |
| > Still 7,000 tickets left.......If they black it out (which is
> unlikely), then I'll be heading to the Dublin house. I'm sure they
> can get it off the Satelite.
I heard it was illegal for bars to show NFL games that are locally
blacked out. Besides, even if Dublin House could carry the game the
place would be so packed it would be ridiculous.
Joe
|
36.601 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Dec 30 1991 16:13 | 8 |
| I wouldn't want to drive to say Pueblo. Theres nuttin down ther...
I'm not going to worry. I think that the remainder of tixs will be
gone by Tuesday afternoon.
Go Broncos. Best 12-4 team!
Tim
|
36.602 | too many heartaches, to cry over.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang! | Tue Dec 31 1991 08:55 | 5 |
|
I'd say Jeff Riggen's cartoon goes a far way towards explaining the
current emotions of the fans...
;^)
|
36.603 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Tue Dec 31 1991 09:46 | 3 |
| Blackout will be lifted - only 1200 tickets left.
Joe
|
36.604 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Dec 31 1991 15:30 | 5 |
| It feels good to get excited about a Bronco game again. Denver should
win this one. Then KC here or at the Bills for bragging rights.
This is the time to turn up the heat.
BoB
|
36.605 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Jan 03 1992 17:36 | 11 |
| The Oilers came to town last night. Pardee wants a rested team.
They planed a light workout for today. Should be ideal weather
conditions tomorrow. It's not a factor.
Broncos have been working hard. They practiced both New Years Eve
and New Years day which kind of showed me they're taking this
game seriously. No blackout but I don't suspect anybody seriously
thought there would be. Elway is going to throw left handed this
game to save himself for next week.
BoB
|
36.606 | Not for the faint of heart | COMET::FARMER | | Sat Jan 04 1992 21:02 | 9 |
| DENVER WIN'S!!!!!!!
What a game. One of the all time Denver comeback victories ever.
Elway is still the man with a mission. With the exception of Warren
Moon I really enjoyed watching the trash mouths walk with their heads
hung low. I hope Le-Lo Lang's hand is ok. I have normaly been just an
observer of this note but this victory has me quite boisterous.
Now let's see if K.C. can upset the Bill's.....
|
36.607 | | CAMONE::WAY | High-toned son of a bitch | Mon Jan 06 1992 07:22 | 1 |
| Elway Schools Moon -- film at 11
|
36.608 | Not good enough to win. | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Mon Jan 06 1992 07:46 | 2 |
|
Denver was given the game!
|
36.609 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | See ya in August, Faiders | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:03 | 57 |
| Elway does it...again. You can talk about his 0-fer record in Super Bowls or
his mediocre stats, but what he did Saturday was incredible. Like Parcells
said on NFL Live Sunday morning, when it's 4th down on a last-minute drive in
the playoffs, that's as high a pressure situation as it gets in the NFL.
It's so ironic that the offense comes through on a day when the defense is
playing as poorly as they've played all year. The offense has struggled
virtually all season but scored 3 TD's for only the third time since opening
day. On defense, Denver just couldn't get any pressure on Moon. And when
they did, Moon would make a nice move to escape. Needless to say, Moon
played one hell of a game - I totally expected Houston to come into Denver
and just play terrible. I didn't think Moon could run like that and the scoop
pass to a running back as he was going down was unbelievable.
Any replies here in Sportsnotes that suggest Denver was unlucky or
undeserving, well, that's just not true. Here's a team that has been carried
by their defense most of the way this season, and they suddenly can't stop the
Oilers until the very end, and even then Houston was able to take quite a bit
of time off the clock and then nails a punt at the 2-yard line. Three 4th
down conversions, the last two of which would've ended Denver's season and the
first probably would've also. And these weren't 4th and inches or half a yard,
either. We're talking 4th and 4, 4th and 6, and 4th and 10. When John took
off running on the 4th and 6, I didn't think he was gonna make it. And when
it came to the 4th and 10 three plays later, I just said to myself that this
was too much to ask of a team that's been barely hanging in there all day.
The stats were virtually even: Houston led in total yards by 4; Houston led
in possession time by 52 seconds; turnovers were even. Houston got a huge
break in the 1st half on that roughing the passer call on Atwater's pick on
a play that featured the latest flag in NFL history. That was very possibly
a 14-point swing.
Some unsung heroes in the game:
Sewell - Can you believe there was talk during training camp that this guy
migh not even make the team?
Kubiak - Great job on the game-winning FG with the poor snap.
Vance - Maybe not really an unsung hero, but he's done quite a bit the past
2 months or so and has probably surpassed Michael Young as Denver's clutch
receiver. He's still afraid to take a hit or will run out of bounds, but he
has made the big catch when Denver has needed it.
Now it's onto the AFC Championship game in Buffalo. Denver's 4th in 6 years
and Luckalo's 3rd in 4 years. Meanwhile, Houston has been to the playoffs the
past 5 years but has failed to reach the AFC Championship game during that time.
I don't think Denver will win. Not because of how Denver's defense suddenly
looked so vulnerable against Houston. Not because of how Buffalo dismantled a
KC team (which failed to show up BTW, but that's not my point). The biggest
reason I think Luckalo will win is simple: home field. In their last 3 home
playoff games the Bills have looked virtually unbeatable with the possible
exception of the divisional playoff against Miami last year. That crowd will
be extremely loud and rowdy come Sunday and Luckalo will have the momentum
from the opening kickoff. I'm not saying it will take a miracle for Denver to
win, but they will need to play a very good game and keep their composure in a
hostile environment - something Denver is not especially known for.
Joe
|
36.610 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:10 | 15 |
| I give Denver and especially Elway lots of credit for coming back the
way they did. This last-minute drive stuff is making an Elway believer
out of me.
I give Houston's offense lots of credit. 24 points should have been
enough to win that game. As Glenn said in another note, turning the
ball over to Denver on the 2 with 2:07 to go and no timeouts should
have been enough. Denver converted 2 4th downs on their final drive.
I didn't see the end of the game because I was on my way to Springfield
for the Oklahoma at UMass game, but there's no excuse for 2 defensive
breakdowns like that.
I feel very, very badly for Warren Moon.
John
|
36.611 | Excellent synopsis, Joe... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:10 | 1 |
|
|
36.612 | The crowd | COMET::FARMER | | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:40 | 4 |
| Take the crowd out early.....that's the key. But they have shown they
can play well in Buffalo even though they lost 27-28 last year. If they
hit on something big early it could be all they need.....
|
36.613 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Jan 06 1992 10:43 | 25 |
|
I feel bad for Moon also. The man played a great game but
they lost.
However, I feel GREAT for the Donks! :^) I can't say enough
about Elway. Like I said in a previous note pertaining to
him making/not making the HOF, he has entertained this Bronco
fan to no end.
I don't know if that's a fair assessment of the D Joe. They
looked like a sieve early but held Houston to 3 points in the
last 40:?? of the game. Almost 3 quarters! It was rare to see
them adjust so well.
Ole Todd Christenson was giggling his fool haid off when Givens
was giving Elway the business after an incomplete pass. Then,
when Dimry dumped Givens on his face, Todd gets all bent out of
shape. I thought it was justice in motion. They should bar all
ex-raiders from the booth! ;^)
Houston woulda won that game if they had a running game to run
out the clock. A couple of those pass incompletions really helped
the Broncos out in the last minutes of the game.
Claybroon
|
36.614 | Now if someone would have done that to Deion... | SHALOT::MEDVID | paint me in leather | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:17 | 6 |
| For me, it was a pleasure to see Givens' body shuddering in real pain
instead of that "thing" he does after a good catch or a TD.
What goes around...
--dan'l
|
36.615 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:21 | 9 |
| Cream Puff schedule = AFC Championship game for Broncos? They
proved they are as good as AFCs top teams. Good enough to go to SB, I
don't think so, but they recovered from a loosing season better than
anyone else has with the exception of the cowgirls.
Will the bandwagon start now?
Tim
|
36.616 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Muddy Mudskipper SHow | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:35 | 10 |
| Great game. Moon and Elway played great. But Pardee was outcoached.
If the Broncos keep it close, they'll win. buffalo doesn't seem to
thrive on close games.
Do what the Giants did. Whack Andree Reed around a little bit.
Hoping for a non-blowout.
JD
|
36.617 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Need one of those endolphin rushes | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:42 | 13 |
|
The big difference next week is that Denver will be playing a team with
decent linebackers. I don't think Buffalo's lb's would have allowed
Elway to scramble for the 1st down on the last drive the way Houston
did.
As a relatively objective listener(not a fan of the Broncos, Oilers, or
Raiders, I thought Christenson was relatively unbiased, and at times
seemed to be pro-Denver--especially when talking about Reeves). I
think a lot of Bronco fans don't like an ex-Raider doing their g ames.
Bruce
|
36.618 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:45 | 11 |
|
Something tells me that the Donks will change the pattern they've
established over the past several years...
And get the living crap kicked out of them in the AFC championship
game instead of the Super Bowl.
[isfh]
|
36.619 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Mon Jan 06 1992 11:58 | 16 |
| RE: Denver's defense
Houston may have only scored 3 points in the 2nd half, but Denver
really didn't stop them at all. Missed FG, FG after a near-TD, and
then Houston did have to punt at the end but only after eating up some
valuable time and moving the ball nearly into FG range. And Houston
was probably only stopped on that last possession (the one where they
punted) because they were being conservative. Houston didn't need a
score at that point.
I always listen to the radio during Bronco games so I hardly ever hear
Charlie Jones and Todd Christensen, but it's hard to believe that's
NBC's 2nd-best crew.
Joe
|
36.620 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The dirtiest player in the game | Mon Jan 06 1992 12:05 | 6 |
| What a game! Not a donkey fan but gotta give Elway credit for coming
thru when da chips was down.
I'll g out on a limb and say Denver will beat da Bills.
THERE! Now they're jinxed!
|
36.621 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Jan 06 1992 12:09 | 6 |
| Thanks for the jinks DD! It won't matter I don't feel. As long as
its a good game.
Please no 77 second season ender, AGAIN!
Tim
|
36.622 | Congrats to the Donks! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Mon Jan 06 1992 12:13 | 8 |
| I thought Christiansen did a good job commenting, he seemed to be
pro-Elway (and Denver) throughout the game, with the exception of Dimry
slamming Givens on his neck which is very understandable, the guy's a
worm for doing that, Givens was clearly going out of bounds and there
was no need for that. Had it been an Oiler player that slammed 'the
Vance' I'm sure you guys would be totally outraged.
Carlos
|
36.623 | y | COMET::FARMER | | Mon Jan 06 1992 13:41 | 8 |
| I agree with the last note. Dimry's actions should have been cause for
an ejection. Givens and the trashmouths are just trying to jibe the
opponents enough that it will effect their game. Elway's drive was
satisfaction enough to shut up the trashmouths....
Drew
|
36.624 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Muddy Mudskipper SHow | Mon Jan 06 1992 13:50 | 7 |
| Carlos -
Can't see how you thought Todd was pro-Denver/Elway. He and Charlie
Jones (oh, I don't like Mr. Jones at all) were absolutely wetting
themselves over Warren Moon and the 'tough' Oiler receivers.
JD
|
36.625 | What! Me Worry? | CSC32::SALZER | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:09 | 15 |
| Well here we are again. One invite away from the big dance.
I said earlier last week that Denver should have won that game
but that was incorrect. It turned out Houston *should* have won.
Moon's performance was nothing short of spectacular and it hurt
bigtime for all of them. They say it's a game of inches. I maintain
the difference in a close game is much less than that.
Sensors detected a disturbance of 4.5 on the Richter scale saturday
evening. It turned out it was all the Bronco fans hitting their
ceilings and bouncing off walls all over the region after the
4th and 10 completion. I was nearly a physical and emotional
wreck by the time Treadwell steped up to kick. Like Chris Berman
said, that was the NFL at it's finest.
Bob
|
36.626 | Elway Index on the rise; Crash coming soon ??? | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:18 | 7 |
| I had forgetten how quiet this conference was lasted year when the Donks
were home sipping hot cocoa during the playoffs.
Could make a lotta money selling Elway Index Futures. The guy bounces
between bumhood and sainthood like a kid's yo-yo.
Bob Hunt
|
36.627 | Big Bad John | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:53 | 1 |
|
|
36.628 | Big Games | COMET::FARMER | | Mon Jan 06 1992 15:09 | 6 |
| Although Denver does seem to take a dive during the "big" dance
they seem to usually come through in all the others. Remember What all
the talk was before the Cleveland game in 87? Denver was going to die.
They came through in the clutch. Let's hope they can do it again..
Drew
|
36.629 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Mon Jan 06 1992 15:34 | 8 |
| Ron Hobson of the Patriot Ledger said that the reason the Broncos
got blown out of the Super Bowls they were in was because Elway
takes the team one round further than they should go. I disagree
with that assessment for the '90 season, but other than that he's
right on the money. If the Bills blow out the Donkeys it shouldn't
be an indictment of Elway, but it probably will be.
/Don
|
36.630 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:02 | 18 |
|
> If the Bills blow out the Donkeys it shouldn't
> be an indictment of Elway, but it probably will be.
Let's see how the game goes. If Elway plays well (as Moon did) but the
Buffalo offense proves too much for Denver's defense (as it probably
will), I'll be the first to give Elway his due. (As we discussed
earlier, Elway has played only passably in maybe one Super Bowl game in
spite of Denver's defensive problems.)
Denver at this point certainly hasn't gone one round further than
expected. Of all the experts I saw all week, I didn't hear one that
gave Houston a chance on Denver's home field, even against the spread.
This seemed to be everyone's "sure thing" game, but it didn't turn out
that way.
glenn
|
36.631 | glenn is wrong wrong wrong 1-2-3 he cain't see | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:20 | 11 |
| Playing "passably" [sic] is largely a function of whether the QB is
forced to chuck it up when everybody knows he's going to cuz his
defense has collapsed and the team is trying to hang on.
John (Big Bad John) has certainly taken this team much farther than
any a the preseason prognosticators thought he could.
The most common dog bet of the weekend (by a very wide margin) was
taking the 2-3 points and the Toilers on the road.
MrT
|
36.632 | No, I cain see (and remember) very clearly, thank you | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:27 | 13 |
|
> Playing "passably" [sic] is largely a function of whether the QB is
> forced to chuck it up when everybody knows he's going to cuz his
> defense has collapsed and the team is trying to hang on.
Huh? What about before the defense has collapsed? Denver looked like
they were going to roll during the first quarter in the Bowl against
Washington but the offense blew mega-opportunities before the 'Skins
pulled themselves together, and Elway looked like he got off the bus
dazed and confused in the 'Frisco game...
glenn
|
36.633 | Donks Might just slip by Luckaolo but I won't bet the farm | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:29 | 10 |
|
Don't have much time today... Just returning from vacation
and I'm burried...
The Donks pulled off another come from behind win and John "HOF"
Elway was awsome...
Gotta love it !!
Big Game
|
36.634 | Elway is unbelievable... One og the GREATEST OF ALL TIME !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Jan 06 1992 18:05 | 30 |
|
I'm back !!
I agree with all of what Joe said. Joe, that was a fine commentary
on one of the leagues best games ever. The Donks may just surprise
the "Experts" this comming Sunday when they visit the Bills on their
home turff. The Donks always play tough in Big Games (less the SB)
and have proven all year that they can win on the road. The Donks
will have to play a perfect game if the Bills are on like they were
against K.C.. If the Bills are playing an average game at home I think
the Donks stand a good cahnce of going to the SB. I really hope
that they do and that John finally gets the SB victory that he so
deserves.
Heres to the MIGHTY DONKS and their great season, no matter the out
come of nexted(tm) weeks game.
My prediction with teams current status;
Broncos 24
Bills 21
I may be swinging on a very weak limb, but hell, they are my team
and I support them to the end !!
GO BRONCOS.... Make Colorado Prouder than you already have !!
Big Game
|
36.635 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Jan 06 1992 18:14 | 4 |
| Swingin' on a limb BG? You have been watching the Oracle to much.
That boy has been doing his balancing act all year.
Tj
|
36.636 | Donks 24 Bills 21 Yes, I'm for real !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Jan 06 1992 18:26 | 15 |
|
Tim,
I really feel that the Donks can win this game. Like I said, They
will have to play a perfect game but stranger things have happened.
the scene in Mile High should prove that to any doubters !! Like
Revees said. "When you have #7, anything can happen" The Donks
historicly play well in Luckaolo... look for a close game and in
a close game I can't think of anyone better to have at the helm than
our man ELWAY !!!
Go Donks !!
Big Game
|
36.649 | This is extremely premature, but still interesting | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Mon Jan 06 1992 19:03 | 13 |
|
> Now if I could figure a way to convert ya to NDism
Well Mike, it appears there may be hope yet. Mel Kiper predicts the
Broncos will select Mirer in the first round. Of course, I still
wouldn't be an ND fan, but at least I'd be a big fan of one of their
former players.
Hey, that's about as close as you can expect it to get. :^)
Joe
|
36.637 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 06 1992 20:20 | 11 |
| Could it be
Yep, it is
HAL "Big'n'Lame" HUNTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
(8^0*
JaKe
|
36.638 | Thats A Real Slam !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Mon Jan 06 1992 20:29 | 20 |
| Listen Jerk... I Mean JaKe...
I resent you makin a compairison between me and HAL... There
is not one outragous comment in any of my replies today. I
guess to live up to your comparision I'll go ahead and make one
now...
The Steelers will be in the SB nexted(tm) year...
HA HA HA ! Thats a Joke... Wonder what kind of hack they'll hire
to complete the job of draging them down to the likes of the Clowns
that Knoll Started.
;^)
HAL, I Am Not !!!
Big Game
|
36.639 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Mon Jan 06 1992 20:34 | 14 |
|
>> I resent you makin a compairison between me and HAL... There
>>is not one outragous comment in any of my replies today. I
^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
I agree, it's more like 15 or 20!!!!
You Donk fans should be hoping that Buffalo beats the Donks 'cause
there'd only be ANOTHER HUGE embarrassment in the Super Bowl!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
36.640 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jan 07 1992 07:53 | 4 |
| You're not taking bets on that prediction are you Big and Gamey? If
so, PLEASE send Mail!!
BTW, Elway looks like Trigger.
Denny
|
36.641 | It hurts, but it's the truth | TALLIS::SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Where is Fee Waybill Now??? | Tue Jan 07 1992 08:09 | 8 |
|
Come on, Denver fans.. How can any of you honestly believe that
Big-bad-john and company are gonna make it to the bowl this year..
After all, you're forgetting one important point about the AFC Championship
game...
They're not playing the BROWNS!!!!!!!
|
36.650 | Mirer a Donk? Git that benchseat ready | CTHQ2::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Tue Jan 07 1992 09:01 | 13 |
| Broncos to select Mirer? To sit on the bench ala Steve Young for
another decade. If the only team that'll draft him high is the Donks,
watch for him to stay at ND. I assume his old man is making the calls
now to find out the interest in him.
IMO, he's making a mistake in leaving as I think he's been real
inconsistent at ND. Don't know how marketable he really is. Got to
admit though, that his Sugar Bowl performance didn't hurt his chances
of going in the first coupla rounds. Be interesting to see how he
matches up with the other QB's ( Sacca, Matthews, Weldon, etc.)
Here's hoping he stays, but that's purely a selfish thought.
MikeL
|
36.651 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jan 07 1992 09:26 | 5 |
| Actually, he may not be sitting on the bench ala Steve Young for
another decade. Gary Kubiak is retiring after this season and John
Elway will be in his 10th season in 1992.
John
|
36.644 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Tue Jan 07 1992 10:18 | 13 |
| � The most common dog bet of the weekend (by a very wide margin) was
� taking the 2-3 points and the Toilers on the road.
� MrT
Wrong MorT, the line opened at 3 and moved to 3� indicating a lot
of early money was going on the Broncos. If lots of money had then been
bet on the Oilers the line would've dropped, but it didn't. It stayed at 3�
meaning that money was being bet evenly at that line. Matter of fack the
line went up to 4 with some bookies here, meaning heavy money was being bet
on the Broncos. Stick to things you know about, like obfuscation.
/Don
|
36.645 | Broncos are one of the best teams in football, consistently !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 10:52 | 17 |
|
No, I'm nat taking anymore bet... I have a few peso's out there
already.
The Donks might just make it to the Bowl this year. Remember, any
thing can happen. The Donks play the Bill's tought in Luckaolo and
I don't see that changing significantly for this game. If it's a
close game, The Donks will be heading to the land of 1000 lakes,
bet on that.
If the Donks Lose this comming weekend, so be it. They have had a
great season and have turned things around from what looked to be a
certin nose dive into the cellar for many years to come.
Go Donks... Prove The Doubting Thomas' Wrong !
Big Game
|
36.646 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:02 | 7 |
|
>>> -< Broncos are one of the best teams in football, consistently !! >-
The Broncos are on of the best teams in the *AFC* consistently.
There's a big difference. Every year in the Elway Era that they
got their butts kicked in the Super Bowl there were about three
NFC teams that were better than them.
|
36.652 | He's probably to competitive though !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:16 | 6 |
| Elways contract is up in 1 year... I wouldn't be surprised to see him
hang `em up after that... after all, he's already made 17 million $$$
playing for the Donks and has remaind relitively un-hurt. He'd be
smart to call it a career and enjoy the $$$ he's already made !!
BG
|
36.647 | It's hard to teach the blind to see hte light !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:20 | 6 |
|
What ever...
I quit,
BG
|
36.648 | Envious or jealous? | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:25 | 20 |
| I think the someone better check my replies and what I predicted this
coming weekend. I'm usually a realist. There are some Bronco fans
that predict a win. I'm not one of them!!! I think there are some
that expect Denver to get their butts kicked, but won't reply in here.
Denver does have a chance (any given sunday), but I just don't see
it since the Bills are on a "home" roll! As long as Denver makes a
game of it, then it will be worth watching (like I wouldn't anyway).
Denver has had a great nerve racking season, and they did prove they
could beat Houston & KC. Yes those are the only 2 teams with winning
records that they did beat, but most (not all) of the AFC had the same
problem. Denver beat Minny at Minny. Minny didn't always roll over
and die, they did beat SF in week 4?
Anyway, heres to a good game, and may yourr favorite team win (if
they are still in)......
Tim
|
36.653 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:38 | 6 |
| Denver does need another QB. They picked up Shawn Moore last year,
and I think he has a good arm, but now that Gary is outta there, then
another QB would be great. Heck, Steve Young would fit in great with
the broncos. He's a scrambler!
Tj
|
36.653 | | SASE::SZABO | Wish it was a 6 paycheck month. | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:42 | 6 |
36.655 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:53 | 5 |
|
I ain't envious or blind just realistic. Until the Broncos do
something more than continue to set new lows for Super Bowl in-
eptness they can't be considered a great team nor Elway a great
quarterback.
|
36.656 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | PojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPieces | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:57 | 3 |
| Hawk, who the hail is this guy Jeffires?
Mark.
|
36.657 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:11 | 4 |
| Mark, Jeffires is the correct spelling for the last name of Houston WR
Haywood Jeffires, even though it's pronounced Jeffries.
John
|
36.658 | nexted year he get's Ninja Turtle blimp! | CST17::FARLEY | R.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom & Dad :*( | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:22 | 10 |
| Sheesh!
My guess is the 'Postraphe Police got a T.I. "Learn to Spell" for
Christmas!!!!!!
;^)
remaining Santa's helper, I am,
Kev
|
36.659 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:35 | 7 |
|
Tommy,
I'll just bet you can come up with 1 QB who is great but never
won the big'n.
Claybroon
|
36.661 | Youu got me started now | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:48 | 4 |
| Notice "most" of the people putting down Elway & Broncos are the
people who's teams are out golfing instead of watching game films?
Tim
|
36.662 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:52 | 21 |
| > If the Donks Lose this comming weekend, so be it. They have had a
> great season and have turned things around from what looked to be a
> certin nose dive into the cellar for many years to come.
You've been listening to too many of those 'expert prognosticators,'
Big Game. Denver was no more destined for a run of bad years than the
current Cowboys. Last year was an aberration caused by a combination of
problems. It's happened all around the league: Giants in '87, Bears in
'89, etc.
> Elways contract is up in 1 year... I wouldn't be surprised to see him
> hang `em up after that... after all, he's already made 17 million $$$
> playing for the Donks and has remaind relitively un-hurt. He'd be
> smart to call it a career and enjoy the $$$ he's already made !!
IMO Elway doesn't plan on retiring any time soon - at least certainly
not after next year.
Joe
|
36.663 | Good not great | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:15 | 15 |
|
re .659
Sure Claybroon, I can come up with a *few* great QB's that have
never one the big one but none that have fared nearly as badly in
it as Elway has on a consistent basis.
My original note was in response to the Donks being labeled as being
'consistently' one of the best teams in the NFL. My contention was that
they've been one of the best teams in the *AFC* not necessarily the
NFL. They've lost three SB's in the Elaway Era by an aggregate of more
than a hundred points. 'Nuff said.
|
36.664 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:19 | 22 |
| >Until the Broncos do something more than continue to set new lows for
>Super Bowl ineptness they can't be considered a great team...
I'll buy that. We don't don the "G" string if it's much too big for
us. Don't deserve to if you cain't fill it out.
>... nor Elway a great quarterback.
Now wait just a minute. What about all the great players in team
sports who never got a ring? Do we discount them too? There are
dozens a ringless HoFers out there. It's to John's credit (Big Bad
John) that he's continually pulled this team, poor pass protection,
undersized DL, bad running game and all up into so many Conf. Title
games and SBs.
I think a argument that John (Big Bad John) cain fill out that "G"
string to the point it will snap cain be made whether or not he ever
makes it to another Bowl or wins one. He's only one main on a squad
a 45 players. This ain't boxing or tennis or golf or even hoops you
know.
MrT
|
36.665 | Donks *ARE* | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:26 | 8 |
| So let me get this straight, You can't be "consistently one of the
best teamt in the NFL" unless you win the Superbowl or are in the NFC.
Ok, I see now... Sorry I was so far out of line. I'll be sure to get
my facts straight before making such an outlandish statement again.
Give it a rest !
BG
|
36.667 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The dirtiest player in the game | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:58 | 9 |
| All you Donk fans remind me a_Heiser, always hedging his bets. Show
some ganos. I ain't even a Donk fan and I predicted another
Champeenchip win. kelly will throw three intros in the first half and
Big bad John (thanks T. what a great name) will throw 3 tds. Look for
Denver to win a laugher.
Who was the last AFC team to beat Denver in postseason?
|
36.668 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:10 | 14 |
|
> So let me get this straight, You can't be "consistently one of the
> best teamt in the NFL" unless you win the Superbowl or are in the NFC.
> Ok, I see now... Sorry I was so far out of line. I'll be sure to get
> my facts straight before making such an outlandish statement again.
In the last 5-10 years the Broncos would have to rate behind NFC teams
San Francisco, Washington, the New York Giants, and Chicago by any
objective measure. If #5 qualifes as "consistently one of the best
teams in the NFL" then you're absolutely correct. In baseball it
usually wouldn't get you in the playoffs...
glenn
|
36.669 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:16 | 8 |
|
Well, I went to the "Hoot School of Predictions". Our motto
is "Make No Predictions, Eat No Crow". :*)
Don't get me wrong. I'll be rooting like crazy for them.
There is nothing wrong with realizing how good Buffalo is.
Claybroon
|
36.670 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:26 | 9 |
| 24 points saturday was the second highest scored against Denver this
season. It was Houston again which scored 42 in their first meeting.
Ever since last season's collapse and squeeker win by the Bill's
I have patiently been waiting for a rematch. Odds makers and
experts don't have much hope for the Broncos. I believe they
have a lot going for them starting with working the Oilers' passing
attack as a tuneup.
BoB
|
36.671 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:00 | 3 |
| Jist remember Donk fans, MorT also predicted a Denver win over the
'sissy ' 9ers a few Bowls ago.
Denny
|
36.672 | the real source | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bush Go Home! no you keep him | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:01 | 7 |
|
hey I tagged BBJ that years ago and the B is for bad as in horrible
player...
any broncos fan can tell ya that....
mike
|
36.673 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:01 | 17 |
|
Glenn,
The Broncos must be rated in the top two for 3 of the last six since
they went to the Superbowl. If this is not fact then the whole playoff
scene is a big scam. The Broncos were the best in the AFC the 3 years
they went to the SB. The year SF beat them I don't think they would
have lost to anyother NFC team. The year the lost to the Skins they
surely wouldn't have and the year the Midgets beat them the Midgets
were the only good team to speak of in the NFC. Wake up Pal... The
Donks are at the top and their consistent return to the championship
games proves that.
Heres to the AFC... May they provide the biggest butt whipping the
NFC has had in a long, long, long time !!
BG
|
36.674 | WELL said Big Game! Bravo !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:21 | 1 |
|
|
36.675 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The dirtiest player in the game | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:26 | 8 |
| >>>The year SF beat them I don't think they would
>>>have lost to anyother NFC team.
Whoa there Big Numb, The Rams woulda crushed dem Donks, Hail, even the
Jints woulda beat them that year.
|
36.676 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:30 | 5 |
| beat me to it, didn't the Rams beat the 49ers in both their regular
season meetings that year?
py
|
36.677 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:30 | 7 |
| Okay MorT, here's the deal. You get the Donkeys and 11 points
for a P-Name bet. If the Broncos win or cover I have to carry that
disgusting "Homer,Plato,Voltaire,BobKnight" personal name for a
week. BUT, if the Bills win and cover you take my P-Name for a week.
Whaddaya say?
/Don
|
36.678 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:33 | 2 |
| Fat chance /Don. He's skeered.
Denny
|
36.679 | DD predicts broncos win? Hexer!!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:40 | 4 |
| Are the Broncos playing the brownies this week? This file hasn't
been this active since week 15!!!
Tim
|
36.680 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Tammany,Daley,Stalin,Farley | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:57 | 5 |
| Ain't skeered. Hell, I been one a Dave Smith's biggest fans for
years. Had him on my rote team for two years for gawd's sakes
and steal regret having traded him.
MrT
|
36.681 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:00 | 13 |
| > Mark, Jeffires is the correct spelling for the last name of Houston WR
> Haywood Jeffires, even though it's pronounced Jeffries.
When I saw his name on his back during the game Saturday I though it
was spelled wrong.
> Who was the last AFC team to beat Denver in postseason?
Pittsburgh in the playoffs following the '84 season. That was Denver's
only playoff loss at home.
Joe
|
36.682 | Not too difficult to figure this one out... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:02 | 28 |
|
> The Broncos must be rated in the top two for 3 of the last six since
> they went to the Superbowl. If this is not fact then the whole playoff
> scene is a big scam.
Congrats on finally figuring this out! The Broncos (actually the
entire AFC with a couple exceptions) have been scamming lovers of
championship-caliber football for years!
> Wake up Pal... The
> Donks are at the top and their consistent return to the championship
> games proves that.
Where have you been the last decade, Big Game? The NFC has
consistently dominated the AFC in regular season play and in the Super
Bowl. Making the Super Bowl does not necessarily make you the second
best team in football. If the Broncos had been in the NFC and never
made the Super Bowl due to the competitive imbalance and the Browns had
continually taken their place in the AFC, would you be crowing that the
Browns are better than the Broncos? Of course they wouldn't be...
The fact of the matter is that the NFC championship game has been a
closer game than each of the three last Bronco Super Bowl
appearances, and the NFC runner-up has arguably been a better team than
the Broncos in each of those years...
glenn
|
36.684 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:16 | 6 |
|
Yup Waugaman's on the money again. I didn't vote in the
NoTY contest because I thought the whole idea silly but if
I had I would have voted for G_Waugaman.
|
36.685 | So then it's a bet, MorT? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:35 | 1 |
|
|
36.686 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Tammany,Daley,Stalin,Farley | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:39 | 3 |
| If you wanna negotiate with me buddy then do so in private.
MrT
|
36.687 | HAHAHAHA� CHICKEN! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ChrisDishman,JackDelRio,MorT | Tue Jan 07 1992 16:47 | 1 |
|
|
36.688 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | The dirtiest player in the game | Tue Jan 07 1992 17:44 | 2 |
| YO /er I'll bet you a sixer of any beer you want. Donk fans are skeert,
but I ain't.
|
36.689 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 07 1992 18:02 | 2 |
| Quit DD, your hexin' the donks. What, do you Joe & Jeff have a
little side bet goin' on up there on the hill?
|
36.690 | You Guys Slay Me With Your Anti-Donk B.S. Wake Up !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Tue Jan 07 1992 18:48 | 35 |
| Glenn & Co.
It has become painfully obviously to me that you boys aren't about
to give the Donks or any other AFC team credit for playing great
football. The Donks/Bills have proven over the past several years
that they can and are able to compete with the so called "Gawds of
the NFC"
I've been right here the past decade, Glenn. And yes, you are correct
when you say the the NFC has dominated the AFC in superbowls over those
years. But, For you to say that the runner up in the NFC was a better
team and would have won is pure conjecture on your part. You have no
facts to back up what you say. The Broncos and Bills are great teams
and can compete with any NFC teams. The fact of the matter is that the
Broncos and bills are at the top of the NFL right up ther with a few
teams from the NFC. let me see if I can name a few Stiffs in the NFC
for ya;
Tampa, Rams, Cardinals, Greenbay, Vikes, Bears
HTH
When the Time comes (Jan 27th) I can't wait to shove a whole bunch
on you.
There is no way that the Rams would have beaten the Donks.
Tim, isn't it nice to see the activity in this file. Unlike some
other teams, the Donks are still in it. Most if not all of the
Anti-Donks are fan of those teams which have already sat down for the
year. To bad they can't root for their teams.
Big Game
|
36.691 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jan 08 1992 08:20 | 9 |
| > football. The Donks/Bills have proven over the past several years
> that they can and are able to compete with the so called "Gawds of
> the NFC"
You're half right Big n' Gamey. The Bills have played well against the
NFC in the Bowl and may even have a shot at a win this year. The Donks
on the other hand... Which NFC teams ahve they beaten the last few
years that were playoff teams the year they played?
Denny
|
36.692 | One from the old days... | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Jan 08 1992 08:40 | 14 |
|
What I wanna know is...Where's Jill?????? 8^))))
Sorry Big Lame you just don't cut it! Your trite diatribes on how
great the Donko's are, to say the least are boorish. Now Jill on the
other hand would have handed Glenn(1 n or 2?) his ever lovin head!!
Shame on you. BTW the Bills WILL crush the Donkey's sunday, they have
NO chance and no clue. The ONLY reason the Burro's make it to the
playoffs is because of the altitiude factor, take em' away from Pile
High and kiss the Donks goodbye!
Steve
|
36.693 | What exactly is so bad about #5? Inferiority complex at work? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 08 1992 09:15 | 23 |
|
Sorry, Big Game, but you've got it all wrong. I *have* given the
Broncos their due. I've rated them #5 in the NFL in the Elway era.
That's pretty darn good if you ask me. I didn't put the Rams ahead of
them (although they might have been better that *one* year, the year of
the Broncos' worst-ever Super Bowl performance-- and in truth the
Giants were really the better team that season anyway but lost to the
Rams in a tough divisional playoff game). By no coincidence, all of
the teams I rated ahead of the Broncos had to come out on top in the
tough NFC and *all* won Super Bowls. Is that really so outrageous?
Also, I wouldn't mind in the least if the AFC finally breaks through
this year. I wouldn't mind if it was the Broncos that did it, either
(but don't go taking credit for the Broncos if it's the Bills who
actually do it).
Methinks you perceive any honest analysis as some kind of personal
vendetta against the Broncos. No, we're talking O-B-J-E-C-T-I-V-I-T-Y
here. Calling them as I see them. I know I shouldn't bring that kind
of thing into the Bronco note, so I apologize.
glenn
|
36.694 | did you model for Jeff's cartoon? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Is it a question of Love? hahaaaaa | Wed Jan 08 1992 09:35 | 9 |
|
Jack, buddy you better go down to Health Services and get your blood pressure
check. I'm sincerely worried about your state of health at this moment....
repeat after me "it's only a game it's only a game..."
;^)
mike
|
36.695 | So, when does the Colts' season start ? | LUNER::BROOKS | The People's NoTY 1991 : DrM | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:23 | 46 |
| There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ...
There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ...
There now .... :-(
What can I say ? I'm in Houston watching the game, and in the 1st
quarter, and part of the second it looks like the AFC title game. Moon
was smoking the ball as the Donks foolishly tried to blitz him
(jefferies caught a 50 yarder on the first play of the game), then when
the played off, White ran strongly.
But there was a BIG danger sign early, IMO :
- Houston's defense never got in a consistent groove as Sewell and
Green ran for solid yardage all day.
Despite that, I thought it would be an Oiler win, but with all due
respect to Mr Ed ...
The Oilers gave this game away.
- Two drops by Jefferies, one at the 5 (which would have been 1st and
goal), and the other in the end zone.
- A missed chip shot FG.
- Mike Munchak's 4 penalities, 2 in the last drive.
- Poor coaching decisions - the worst of all being the awful TO taken
on 4th and 10.
Elway had thrown three straight incompletions, was dazed and winded,
and what does Pardee do ?
Allow the buck-toothed rascal time to regroup and talk things over.
How STUPID can you be ?
BTW, I didn't see any undue trash-talking. Elway was doing just as much
as Givens, but this is the Denver note ....
Anyhow, good luck to the DOnks, but I don't see them coming within 10
points of Buffalo, if the Bills come to play like they did Sunday.
Houston did as much to lose that $!%@&*!( game as Denver did to win it.
Doc
|
36.696 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Tammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarley | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:30 | 6 |
| >Houston did as much to lose that game as Denver did to win it.
Midnight, I been wondering. You related to Chris Dishman by any
chance?
MrT
|
36.697 | Not total NFC domination! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Homey don't play dat! | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:42 | 18 |
| I have to agree with Glenn and the others, for the most part, on what's
been said about NFC domination during the 80's. Big Game is blinded
by the Donks and there's no sense even trying to get thru. :-)
There are three teams (a good case can be made for a couple others)
however, that seem to buck the NFC domination theory, and they are the
same three teams that led the way in the 70's AFC domination, namely:
the Steelers, Raiders, and Dolphins. While only the Raiders won the
Superbowl (twice) in the 80's, all three clubs continued (for the most
part) to win against NFC rivals. As far as this year goes, if the Donks
don't miraculously luck out and get past the Bills, then there should
be no 'domination' from either conference. In other words it could go
either way. Here's something to consider, if the Bills were to make it
to the Superbowl (whats the chances of that happening..:-) and they
totally ripped apart either the Redskins or Lions, should we then
consider this season as AFC dominated?
Carlos
|
36.698 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Wed Jan 08 1992 10:49 | 7 |
| Doc,
Didn't see Elway talking trash, but certainly saw Givens. All Givens
had to do is look 5 yards to his left and observe the classy Moon.
Now there's a professional.
MikeL
|
36.699 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:02 | 17 |
|
Glenn...
I know that you rated the Donks in the Top 5. The thing that gets me
is that you and others rate the Donks based solely on their Stupidbowl
appearances which IMHEO (In My Honest Exalted Opinion) is not a fair
and objective way to grade a club. I guess I'll let this lie for now
and pick it up next week when the Donks are preparing for the Lions
in Minny. ;^)
Carlos, What are you, NUTS !! The Fish haven't done a damn thing
in the `80's... Yea, one SB, Big deal... And the Faiders, Well,
they didn't even make it past the the so call "Weak AFC" lasted(tm)
year. I do believe that the Bill's Blew them out so bad they didn't
even have to catch a plane home. This won't happen to the Donks.
BG
|
36.700 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | PojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPieces | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:42 | 1 |
| .x00
|
36.701 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:56 | 4 |
|
re .700
You lead a full life there, Lefebvre.
|
36.702 | Donks are a fake! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Love the Lord, thy God. | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:58 | 11 |
| >> Carlos, what are you NUTS!!
Yeah.....So..?
My point was not the these three clubs dominated the league in the
80's, but, that they weren't dominated by the NFC clubs....get it!
By the way, I hope you'll be so bold about eating all that crow come
Monday...
Carlos
|
36.703 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Wed Jan 08 1992 11:59 | 2 |
|
WTFC? :^)
|
36.704 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:02 | 26 |
|
> I know that you rated the Donks in the Top 5. The thing that gets me
> is that you and others rate the Donks based solely on their Stupidbowl
> appearances which IMHEO (In My Honest Exalted Opinion) is not a fair
> and objective way to grade a club.
BG, sounds like you're contradicting yourself. Since Glenn put Denver
in his top 5 over the past 5-10 years, it's obvious he didn't base
that solely on Super Bowl performances. I mean, here's a team that
hasn't taken home the big trophy but they're still classified by Glenn
to be in the league's top 18%. And that sounds even more generous when
you consider they didn't even reach the AFC title game in Elway's first
3 seasons and have missed the playoffs in 3 of Elway's nine seasons.
Meanwhile, I do believe Denver has a game this Sunday. Geez, 10:30
kickoff for their biggest game of the season - guess I'll have to get
up early. :^)
Looks like Kartz will be out but Henderson should play. Mark Jackson has
been cleared to practice and he might even play Sunday. That would be quite
a comeback - he was thought to be out for the season even if Denver
makes the SB. Haven't heard anything about Young. Also, Bruce Smith
might not play and isn't talking to the press.
Joe
|
36.705 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | PojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPieces | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:22 | 10 |
| <<< Note 36.701 by MONGUS::BRYDIE "Howard Roark laughed." >>>
> You lead a full life there, Lefebvre.
What's your excuse?
Mark.
|
36.706 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:25 | 3 |
|
I forgot to add a [isfh] my apologies but those .xxoo notes are truly
inspired.
|
36.707 | | CARROL::LEFEBVRE | PojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPieces | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:26 | 5 |
| And the Donks diatribe is?
Hal tried hard (tm)
Mark.
|
36.708 | Chances are I'll be eating Tons of the dreaded Black Bird !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:26 | 15 |
| Clay-wad... What the heck is WTFC... I think I got the first 3 words
but the c is throwing me.
Got ya Carlos... I knew what you ment it was the way that you worded
it that made me think you might be trying to say the "Commitment to
Excellence" boys had dominated the AFC along with the Fish. Oh well.
Also, As anyone in this conference can tell you I never shy away
from the crow that is mine to eat. If the Donks lose (which BTW is
better than a 75% chance) I will eat my crow. If they win, I will be
shoveling it as fast as I can to all the Anti-Donks !!
I'm Not Skeerd
BG
|
36.709 | thought of "cares"? | CST17::FARLEY | R.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom & Dad :*( | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:31 | 1 |
|
|
36.710 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:36 | 16 |
| I thought that the AFC & NFC were close in interconference games
over the last 10 years, with this year being a big exception. Ninj,
do you have any of those stats?
I'm not sure that it matters that much since the NFC has won most of
the SBs in the last 10-12 years with the only exception of the faids
winning 2.
Speaking of faids, Flores is now the head man for seahawks. That
could be interesting. If he picks up where he left off in LA, then
the seahawks will no different than they have the past 15 years. If
Tom does what he did in his 1st 4 years with the faids, then Seattle
could be a contender.
Tim
|
36.711 | Not with it today ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:43 | 6 |
|
Boy, I musta been in a time warp to miss that one...
Thanks,
BG
|
36.712 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Jan 08 1992 12:54 | 6 |
| Not off-hand but I do have them at home. The AFC has consistently won
the inter-conference matchup with the NFC except for 3-4 years, and
this year's margin of 33-19 by the NFC was the biggest ever for the NFC
and probably is the biggest ever for either side.
John
|
36.713 | Just say no to parity anyway.... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:46 | 15 |
|
> this year's margin of 33-19 by the NFC was the biggest ever for the NFC
> and probably is the biggest ever for either side.
I think I read somewhere that there was a season in the late 70s where
the AFC's advantage was actually even bigger than that...
Pretty strange that you still have these periods of clear dominance
between conferences in football but no real apparent edge in baseball
in the post-free agent era. Free agency is probably the reason for
that...
glenn
|
36.714 | | FSDEV::MGILBERT | GHWB-Anywhere But America Tour 92 | Wed Jan 08 1992 14:04 | 11 |
|
First off I'm truly biased. I hate both the Donks and the Bills. With
that said I predict a Buffalo victory. I can't see the OL of Denver
keeping the Bills away from Elway for very long and I'm not convinced
that Denver's secondary can handle the Bills receiver corps.
Bills 30
Broncos 14
|
36.715 | Broncos: These Are Classy Winners! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Tammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarley | Wed Jan 08 1992 14:58 | 6 |
| Read where the Broncos lead the NFL in injuries this year. And
yet here they are scratching and clawing their way to the top a
the hill, Iwo Jima-style. Could this surprising feat be the result
a John (Big Bad John) and his inspiring leadership?
MrT
|
36.716 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:14 | 27 |
| Could be due to the fact that the Broncos had one of the easier
schedules in the League this year....helping them to finish with the
2nd best won-lost record...allowing them a bye in the first round ofthe
playoffs...and a 50-50 chance of reaching the AFC Championship game
(which, as we're all painfully aware...they reached!!).
I don't dislike the Broncos (although a handful of their fans are
irritating as hell!!), but neither do I think they are a top quality
team!! I think Elway is excellent, Fletcher and Croel make for an
excellent pair of OLB's, Mecklenberg is a throw-back, Green has had a
great year...the offensive line has done well....and everything else is
so-so. I don't think the players singled out above (I forgot to
compliment Kragen...a top-notch NT) are enough to take out the Bills
(I'm not a Bills fan either...although I love watching them play) this
time around!! My guess is no better or worse than anyone else's (until
proven right/wrong).....I figure the Broncos to get smoked by the
Bills. The Bills offense has more dimensions than the Oilers
(running game, TE's...), who gave Denver all it could handle at home...
Buffalo 34
Denver 17
Hal Tried Hard(TM),
Nelly
|
36.717 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:23 | 7 |
| So MorT, we got a P-Name bet or do you need more than the alloted
points? If you were a main's main like Mike Childs, you would bet
the game straight up, like he did wif' his Steelers, NO POINTS.
But I guess that hair on your chest is turning to peach fuzz.
/Don
|
36.718 | I'm Not Skeered !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:35 | 9 |
|
Slasher,
I, The representation of a manly man have several bets placed even up
on the Donks/Bills game. I would be more than happy to take you up on
a P-Name wager. Send me mail and we'll discuss the terms and content
of the above mentioned P-Names...
BG
|
36.719 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:39 | 5 |
| I got no beef wif' any Bronco fans small, just one bandwagon
jumper. He's the only one I want to bet wif', if he's main enough
that is...
/Don
|
36.720 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Tammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarley | Wed Jan 08 1992 15:57 | 7 |
| Hey /Robitussin, I axed you to carry on all negoitations in private
via mail. You have violated my confidence in this and that raises
questions about whether you'd welsh when it came payoff time.
Homey don't play dat.
MrT
|
36.721 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:06 | 2 |
| Told ya Slasher, he's yella!
denny
|
36.722 | But I do hope the Donks win | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:10 | 6 |
|
Cacti,
You are confusing manliness with stooooopidity! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.723 | B-caaawk. bbbb-cawwwwk... | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | Thirst N'Howl Roolz! | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:13 | 9 |
|
I'd watch out for those "private negotiations" /er. Make sure
you read the fine print and watch out for the double-talk.
MrT...yer yella! Why not wager in a public forum? It seems
simple enough, a trade of P-names! Too much fer you to swaller?
What gives??
Steve
|
36.724 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:13 | 5 |
| Naw, ClayWad... Just a loyal fan.
Come on T... Don't back down from the slasher...
BG
|
36.726 | Ol' Yeller was Elway's favorite flick, too | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:21 | 5 |
|
Keep it in here, Slash, or a "practical joke" is a-waitin for ya!
glenn
|
36.727 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:31 | 8 |
| No way MorT, I want everyone to know exactly what the bet is
so you cain't squeeze out of it like a greased pig at the County
Fair. I'll take the Bills -11 you got the Broncos. If I win you
carry the "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,Dean" P-Name for a week, and
if you win I'll carry the "Homer,Plato,Voltaire,BobKnight" P-Name
for a week. Simple ain't it? It's your call.
/Don
|
36.728 | Yella! | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jan 08 1992 16:42 | 2 |
| Give 'im time Slash, he's desperately seeking a loophole!
Denny
|
36.729 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:00 | 6 |
|
Given Big Bad John's penchant for doing his 'Bambi vs. Godzilla' act
whenever confronted with a tough D-fense in a big game, T's not going
to bet .
|
36.730 | | DECWET::METZGER | T is yella... | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:03 | 3 |
|
Just trying out the new p-name...
|
36.731 | Any True Donk Fan Would Jump At The Chance... You Not a vain are ya ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:28 | 7 |
| Come on T... You gonna let these bums talk about ya like that ???
I don't know... Maybe ya are Yella like they say...
;^)
Big Game Hunta
|
36.732 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Muddy Mudskipper SHow | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:43 | 10 |
| Why take the bet. /Don is one of the biggest vanes of all. First his
Dean Smith love-fest, and then his reknowned wagon jumping. Heck, when
I worked in the mill, the Slash had a different baseball cap on every
day - with a different team's emblam emblazoned on it. I distinctly
remember him proudly showing off his Calgary Flames hat after they won
the Cup - and this from a purported Broons fan.
Don't be taken in by faux fans, T.
JD
|
36.733 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Jan 08 1992 19:39 | 9 |
| I was shocked when hearing that the Broncos were 11 point dogs in this
one. The more I think about it though, that's probably about right.
Buffalo is good and they are at home. The Bills better not loose this one.
Despite their bad SB record, the record also shows us that Denver has the
ability to win big games especially title games. The Broncos are going
in there reasonably healthy and riding a wave of confidence. I like
the upset.
BoB
|
36.734 | don't doit "T", *I* like yer P'name!!!!! ;^) ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | R.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom & Dad :*( | Wed Jan 08 1992 22:04 | 1 |
|
|
36.735 | JD's memory has become clouded by all that fresh air... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Thu Jan 09 1992 09:57 | 0 |
36.736 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:44 | 10 |
|
Did anybody catch HBO's "Inside the NFL" lasted (tm) night?
They were showing Dan Reeves giving out game balls in the
locker room after beating Houston. The camera was following
him around and in the background, there was a Bronco player
standing there buck nekkid. We're talkin' full frontal show.
I was rollin'!
Claybroon
|
36.737 | A note I got From JaKe | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:47 | 31 |
| From: CELTIK::JACOB 8-JAN-1992 17:40:19.97
To: QUASER::HUNTER
CC: JACOB
Subj: RE: Man, You're rough !!
Hey, I try not to miss an opportunity to harrass someone. You gave me a HUGE
opening and I went thru it like Barry Sanders.
I was ready to leave for my monthly poker game Saturday when the Donks got
the ball on the what, 2 or 3 yd line. I said to my wife, who was rooting
for the pansy Oilscum, that Elway would get the team moved into at least FG
range and leave it up to Treadwell. She took the opposite side. Twas one
of the finest exhibitions of moving with your back up against a wall that
I've seen, short of the drive I in '86. Loved it when the ball went thru
the uprights and the Oilscum was relegated to watching the playoffs henceforth.
Do have to admit I thought Treadwell was gonna miss it when the snap went astraybut Kubiak got it into place DAMNED fast, and Treadwell nailed it, unlike the
hooked extra point that almost cost the Donks the game. One helluva exciting
game, but halfway into the 2nd qtr I thought the Donks were toast.
IMHO, the Bills will beat the Donks but not by any HUGE margin.
Let's negotiate. Lessee, if'n the Donks win, I could put up a P-name proclaim-
ing Mr. Ed to be the second coming, or GOD himself. And run it for a few(3 or 4) days. Whattya offereing if the Donks lose?????
Any points given either way??? If you're really confident, give me the Bills and6! (8^)*
Lemme know
JaKe
|
36.738 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | How'd the Faiders to this weekend? | Thu Jan 09 1992 11:24 | 55 |
| If Denver is going to have a chance in Buffalo where the Bills usually play
at or near the top of their game and where the crowd will be very loud,
there's a few need things they'll need to accomplish IMO (and in this order):
- Don't make it easy for the Bills by committing the big mistakes, and I'm
specifically speaking of turnovers and blocked punts/field goals. Denver's
only blowout loss this season was forged by a blocked punt for a TD and
turnovers, which made things very easy for Houston. Even though the Oilers
scored 42 points, Denver's defense didn't play all that bad - Houston only
had 2 TD drives of more than 13 yards. You just can't make it that easy for
your opponent when you're a big underdog on the road.
- Okay, no flurry of turnovers. But the defense can't let the Bills walk
down the field on every possession and put up 7 points quickly and easily.
If Denver plays a turnover-free first half but lets the Bills score at will,
it could still be a 3 or 4 TD deficit at the half. Denver's defense will
need to keep them in the game because the offense is bound to sputter in
a place like Rich Stadium.
- If the big play is there, they need to convert it. If they're at the Buffalo
40-yard line and Elway puts a pass on the money down near the goal line the
receiver needs to make the catch, even if it's a tough one. Could be the
difference between 7 points and no points. If they're in a 3rd-and-goal
situation they can't have a drop or a bad pass by John - could be the
difference between 3 points and 7 points. Denver will need to take advantage
of all their opportunities and will probably need every point they can get.
If a DB has a pick in his arms, he needs to make the play, especially if it's
one of those where he has nothing but open field in front of him. We saw a KC
defensive back drop an interception that would've gone for 6 just before the
half, and that just may have give the Chiefs new life at halftime. Dimry
returned a pick for what proved to be the winning TD during Denver's biggest
win of the regular season at KC.
- This last one might sound typical or generic, but I still feel it will be
an important ingredient if Denver is going to make a game of it: run the ball
well and control the tempo of the game. Denver ran the ball very well in
Minnesota and the game would've been over with about 6 or 7 minutes left if
Lewis hadn't fumbled down at the goal line. Two years ago in Buffalo (outside
that horrid 77-second span, of course) was probably as well as I've ever seen
the Denver offensive line control the line of scrimmage. Humphrey rushed for
in the neighborhood of 170 yards that day, and Denver *stopped* running the ball
after the debacle started.
Bottom line is that Denver might not need to play an outstanding game but they
can't give the Bills easy scores and they need to take advantage of
opportunities when they come along.
All this said, I say it'll come down to this: Denver will need to be within a
touchdown of the Bills going into the 4th quarter. Buffalo is too tough a
place to play to need a couple scores late in the game.
Joe
|
36.739 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Thu Jan 09 1992 11:59 | 5 |
| So MorT, is the problem that 11 points ain't enough for the
studliest stud in football? Do you need more points? I'm a reasonable
main. Tell us what you need for a point spread.
/Don
|
36.740 | Yella! | VLAB::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:15 | 1 |
|
|
36.741 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:36 | 4 |
|
This reminds me of Hoot and the Parrot. ;^)
Claybroon
|
36.742 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:39 | 12 |
| >B-caaawk. bbbb-cawwwk...
Ok, /Robitussin, I'll take the bet at 11 points with me getting the
push. John (Big Bad John) is aching and bursting in the loinal area
to fill that dangling "G" string near to bursting, so I don't need
no extra points. Besides, who stands more foursquare and loyal for
his fave squads than poor MrT? [nobody]
I accept the terms and conditions as defined in 36.723, and don't
you EVER publicly question my mainliness again buddy.
MrT
|
36.743 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:47 | 9 |
| � I accept the terms and conditions as defined in 36.723, and don't
� you EVER publicly question my mainliness again buddy.
� MrT
How about accepting the terms and conditions in 36.727? The push
on 11 is yours.
/Don
|
36.744 | MrT takes the bet! Push at 11! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:49 | 0 |
36.745 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:53 | 8 |
| Sorry. I mistakenly typed in .723 cuz I was replying while looking
at that note cuz I was extracting the udderly disgusting chiken-
talk attributed to me in that awful note.
.727 it is. I accept the wager under the terms and conditions set
forth in 36.727 with me taking the push at 11.
MrT
|
36.746 | got you now buddy | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:54 | 6 |
| You better stash a six-pack a Family Size DM in your desk,
/Robitussin, cuz it's gonna be mighty rough noting all next
week with "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" over your once
proud name.
MrT
|
36.747 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:56 | 6 |
| JMHO, but, insisting on getting the 'push' is weak!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
36.748 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:08 | 8 |
| Why...
The Slasher just wasn't quick enough or he'd a done the same. I
say congrats to T for being Sharp enough to jump on any advantage
possible... Only thing is he won't need the points... Donks
outright 24-21...
BGH
|
36.749 | Bootlicker, BG 8^) | CTHQ1::LEARY | Look what they've done to my song,Maw | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:11 | 1 |
|
|
36.750 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:24 | 6 |
| HEY !!! I resemble that remark, Mike !! Lets keep it
clean now boys & girls..
;^)
BGH
|
36.751 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:54 | 6 |
|
Of course, even if they have to wear a dispicable p-name,
there was no mention of the *volume* of notes they enter
during the week they wear it. A meatless bet!
Claybroon
|
36.752 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:57 | 9 |
|
> Of course, even if they have to wear a dispicable p-name,
> there was no mention of the *volume* of notes they enter
> during the week they wear it. A meatless bet!
It's worth it if we can get MrT to shaddup for a week...
glenn
|
36.753 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:08 | 6 |
|
Well, don't hold it against me if I get to enjoy everybody
who's been attacking poor MrT having to shaddap. :*)
Claybroon
|
36.754 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:19 | 5 |
| Yeah, having to endure Peanut Gallery heckling from Denny and Metz
was bad. Then it turns out that they were wrong wrong WRONG and
that poor MrT is far from "yella," he is one very ballsy fella !!
MrT
|
36.755 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jan 09 1992 15:04 | 6 |
| > This reminds me of Hoot and the Parrot. ;^)
Nah, no one's said anything about "holding on every play" yet. ;-)
py
|
36.756 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 15:25 | 4 |
| How true that used to be, Paul... Hoot and the Parrot really
were a pair !!
BGH
|
36.757 | whateve happened to Hoot, such a nice Big10 boy | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 16:57 | 1 |
|
|
36.758 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Is it a question of Love? hahaaaaa | Thu Jan 09 1992 17:02 | 4 |
|
A ballsy main woulda bet straight up on such mano-mano bet....
MNSHO
|
36.759 | not when he's ballsy AND brainy buddy | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 17:09 | 1 |
|
|
36.760 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 17:15 | 9 |
|
MrT,
Hoot took the 1st package. I just saw him up at the main
building (he still has his DCU account). He said to tell
all you folks hi and to thank you all who sent their
condolences for his brother's death.
Claybroon
|
36.761 | Where is HAL & the Groaner? | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Thu Jan 09 1992 17:44 | 13 |
| Don't furget the Burgers and Buds...The Parrots favorite line! He is
now on the Green Mountain Falls town council deciding those important
things, like wheather someone can put in a dog run behind their house,
etc..
I agree with ya Joe. Denver has to control the tempo mainly on
defense. Offense would be nice, but when has Denver done good in a
"enemy" noisy stadium? Thats why I don't thin they'll win, even
though I hope they do!!!!!
Anyone wearin their orange tommorrow??? BG???
Tim
|
36.762 | Brainy yes, Yella yes, Ballsy NO!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | Is it a question of Love? hahaaaaa | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:04 | 1 |
|
|
36.763 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:08 | 6 |
| Gonna wear the Offical Elway Lucky Jersy tomorrow, Tj... How
about you !!??
Big Game Hunta
|
36.764 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:12 | 18 |
| Denver is very capable in loud foreign teritory. I cant remember how
far back but the Broncos had to go to Seattle about the last game
of the year. It was to decide the AFC championship. They practiced
for a week with blaring loud speakers and ear plugs. As it turned
out it was a surprisingly silent crowd when the Broncos jumped them
early and stayed on top. The top items to silence crowds are
in no particular order and in any combination.....
1. make first downs
2. score points
3. force turnovers
4. don't let them make 1st downs
5. don't let them score points
6. don't turn the ball over
Pretty easy eh?
BoB
|
36.765 | Silence is golden | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:15 | 4 |
| Correction. It was to decide the AFC west title. Cleveland can
testify to stunning silence also.
BoB
|
36.766 | how many broncos does it take...... | WR1FOR::SHERRILRO | | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:24 | 11 |
|
First of all let me say one thing....I HATE THE DOINKS. But I hope
they beat the Bills. And you all ask me "Ron why do you want the
donkeys to win if you hate them???" The anwser is...............
I need a few good laffs , last time they were in the SB and S.F. beat
the &(^@$#%# out of them there were some good donkey jokes floating
around.
Ron
|
36.767 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:37 | 5 |
|
Yeah, well get your hiney over to the intro note so everybody
will know who your fave teams are. Fair play and all that....
Claybroon
|
36.768 | Denver 31, Seattle 14 | BSS::JCOTANCH | John (Big Bad John) | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:47 | 15 |
| > Denver is very capable in loud foreign teritory. I cant remember how
> far back but the Broncos had to go to Seattle about the last game
> of the year.
Yes, Bob, I remember that one well. You have already corrected
yourself in saying that it was for the AFC West title. It was the last
game of the '84 season and the winner won the division with the loser
forced to play in the wild card game the following week. It was without
a doubt Denver's most impressive road win in the Reeves era considering
what was at stake. All week long the Seahawks and the people of Seattle
were mailing this one in.
Joe
|
36.769 | I hate "the drive" "the fumble" | WR1FOR::SHERRILRO | | Thu Jan 09 1992 18:56 | 6 |
|
re: -2
Uh....Gulp...well o.k. My intro is there.
Ron
|
36.770 | | WLDWST::RCARRUTHERS | Night Flier: ~~v~~ | Fri Jan 10 1992 04:59 | 7 |
|
The Broncos had better hope they lose or Washington will embarrass them.
The Bills will win but the Bronc's will cover the spread. It should be
an entertaining game to watch.
Night Flier ~~v~~
|
36.771 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jan 10 1992 08:16 | 3 |
| re: Monty on the Town Council deciding on dog runs.
Sure hope nobody has a collie!
Denny
|
36.772 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Fri Jan 10 1992 10:31 | 5 |
|
The Bum was running for Mayor last I heard. I just can't see
the Parrot as Mayor... Not even of GMF !!
Big Game Hunta
|
36.773 | | FRETZ::HEISER | games of chance and circumstance | Fri Jan 10 1992 11:47 | 4 |
| Re: Big Bad John
Is that like "I have to go to the John!" or "James Worthy is king of
the low-post-spin-movin' Johns!"?
|
36.774 | Go Broncos. Rah Rah RAH. | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 12:22 | 12 |
| John (Big Bad John) and the dangling "G" string he hopes to fill
to bursting has nothing to do with James UnWorthy's afternoon
snack on a white bread sandwich.
Hey Big Game, are you as excited as I am about the Big Matchup?
John (Big Bad John) and Kelly will be the 2nd monster QB matchup
in a row for John (Big Bad John). No matter who wins the QB
matchup in the SB is gonna be a major letdown in comparison to
those of the Moon/Kelly haid-to-haids with John (Big Bad John) !!
MrT
|
36.776 | Hope they win it early !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Fri Jan 10 1992 12:54 | 6 |
| Yea, T... I'm fired up to see the game. May only get to see bits
and peices though. The memorial service for Hoots brother is at
12:00 noon on Sunday in GMF and thats much more important than any
football game, even the Donks.
Big Game Junta
|
36.777 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:16 | 8 |
| � Yea, T... I'm fired up to see the game. May only get to see bits
� and peices though. The memorial service for Hoots brother is at
� 12:00 noon on Sunday in GMF and thats much more important than any
� football game, even the Donks.
Broncomania must be waning. I can't believe that the service was
scheduled around the playoff game. Must have something to do with the
Bronco fans sick of seeing their team crushed in the Super Bowl ;^)
|
36.778 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:30 | 6 |
|
Not at all... Hoot & The Parrot are putting this together.
I'm sure that they scheduled it during the Broncos game on purpose
just so the we Bronco fans would have to miss the game. ;^)
|
36.779 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:48 | 2 |
| Silly me, how could I forget that Hoot wasn't one of the brainwashed
Colorado orange masses ;^)
|
36.780 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Jan 10 1992 14:43 | 9 |
| The Bills are saying and doing all the right things. They don't want
tp antagonize or throw fuel on any fires. However I still think
they, like all the experts, see this as just a formality needed
to be played to get to the bowl. Mark Jackson will play. Kartz is
probable but questionable is more like it. 11 points still sounds
good.
BoB
|
36.781 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Vince and Teddy say NO to Magic? | Fri Jan 10 1992 14:47 | 13 |
|
> The Bills are saying and doing all the right things. They don't want
> tp antagonize or throw fuel on any fires. However I still think
> they, like all the experts, see this as just a formality needed
> to be played to get to the bowl. Mark Jackson will play. Kartz is
> probable but questionable is more like it. 11 points still sounds
> good.
11 isn't enough Bills by 30.... 42-10
H&R
|
36.782 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:04 | 7 |
| Hey /Robitussin, the line's gone up to *twelve* buddy. Do you give
me 12, avec le pousse, now? Do you have justice in those once proud
frontal lobes of yours?
RSVP.
Poor MrT
|
36.783 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DrM - Faux NOTY | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:30 | 6 |
| Okay MorT if you think one point will make that much a difference
you cain have it. But this is the only thing I'm renegotiating,
all the other terms of our bet still apply. And *don't* try to
weasel out of it!
/Don
|
36.784 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:42 | 8 |
|
> 11 isn't enough Bills by 30.... 42-10
Still wouldn't be as embarrassing as 51-3!
Joe
|
36.785 | don't worry, /Robey, you're dealing with MrT here | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:45 | 7 |
| >And *don't* try to weasel out of it!
Why, I'm hurt that you would even say such a thing, /Robitussin.
We Broncos fans are widely acclaimed as the BEST sports fans in
the world, and tip-top in the integrity department too.
MrT
|
36.786 | Way to be a main about it, Slasher... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:46 | 1 |
|
|
36.787 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Can you say 'triangulated crossfire'? | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:46 | 4 |
| re .783
Gawd, I hope the Bills don't win this one 24-6, and have Elway throw a
garbage TD on the last play of regulation ....
|
36.788 | Yeah, I'm hoping this happens... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:53 | 11 |
|
> Gawd, I hope the Bills don't win this one 24-6, and have Elway throw a
> garbage TD on the last play of regulation ....
I wouldn't mind. Although I'd like to see the p-string, it'd probably
be more fun to see MrT take that twelfth point and turn it into a
"second half surge by Big Bad John to finally burst through the bulging
G-string".
glenn
|
36.789 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:40 | 3 |
| Very Manly there /Don. Actually though, you only had to give him a
xtra 1/2 point. He already had 11 1/2 because a his weasly 'push'.
Denny
|
36.790 | Ya gotta give something to get something Denny... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DrM - Faux NOTY | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:42 | 1 |
|
|
36.791 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Bad_Boy of ::SPORTS | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:42 | 11 |
| Well, Well, Well,
It's come down to the last day of noting before the "Big Game"
is played in Luckaolo. I predict an offensive explosion by
the Donks fueled by the return of Mark Jackson. The Denver
defense will play their best game of the year holding Thomas
to less that 60 yards and Kelly to under 200 passing. The
Bills will have 2 turn overs both of which will be converted by
Denver into points. Look for a big Denver win !!
Big Game
|
36.792 | ol' /Robey simply avoided a spectacle is all | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:52 | 8 |
| Yeah, Denny, but now I have 12 1/2. Call me a_animal abuser for
taking a Hairy Smithna downtown on a numbers deal, fine. Go right
ahaid and give the ASPCA a jingle and turn me in. But don't call
/Robitussin mainly for ceding me this point. He knows that if he'd
refused I woulda bitched-slapped and dog-walked his ace up and down
the street in front a you all, barking like a dog the whole way.
MrT
|
36.793 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DrM - Faux NOTY | Fri Jan 10 1992 16:56 | 8 |
| ================================================================================
Note 36.792 Bronco notes 792 of 792
ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,Dean" 8 lines 10-JAN-1992 16:52
I think you'll wear this well next week MorT. The only slappin'
you do cain't be discussed in this notesfile.
/Don
|
36.794 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway | Fri Jan 10 1992 17:02 | 1 |
|
|
36.795 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Fri Jan 10 1992 17:22 | 10 |
|
>><<< Note 36.794 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway" >>>
Hey "T"winkle"T"oes,
Ye forgot Bradshaw in there!!!
JaKe
|
36.796 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Jan 10 1992 20:23 | 5 |
| If Elway can successfully take advantage of a questionable Bills
defense and the Denver defense has even a good day, the Broncos win
24-21.
BoB
|
36.797 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknight | Mon Jan 13 1992 07:24 | 4 |
| Last week it was the "Drive II". This week is was "The Fumble
II"
/Don
|
36.798 | Donks go down | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | | Mon Jan 13 1992 07:40 | 7 |
|
Only fitting that Eitherway looses the game for them. HeHeHe...
I guess there is next year????
Dirty Dawg
|
36.799 | Broncos performed heriocally in defeat... | ARWEN::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:15 | 11 |
|
> <<< Note 36.794 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway" >>>
^^^^^
Good one, MrT. I was very impressed by the Broncos; I didn't think
their defense was capable of playing that well. Thank goodness for the
Bills that Elway was there to commit the decisive, colossal blunder of
the game. Maybe Gary Kubiak should re-consider his retirement...
glenn
|
36.800 | Crow served cold please | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Free Ivan the terrible | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:44 | 5 |
| Well I know how Houston felt last week...
Denver kicked butt all game and the Buffalo Bills will be stomped in the Bowl
Like a Husker team.
|
36.801 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:46 | 7 |
|
Take Heart Jack it was for the best...you'd have never lasted the two weeks
to the bowl....
here's to another deflated "G" string....
mike
|
36.802 | Respect is little consolation | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 13 1992 09:58 | 55 |
| For possibly the first time in their history the Denver Broncos lost a post-
season game but gained plenty of respect from many people around the country,
but it's little consolation when you're not the one going to Minneapolis.
They also managed to make an ass out of a particular Buffalo writer whose
article ran in a Buffalo paper yesterday. (I'll try to type it in some time
today - at least he can get embarrassed in here).
The many missed chances, tremendous play by the defense, and the near-miracle
at the end just makes this one all the tougher to handle. I wasn't too upset at
halftime despite all the missed chances. If someone said before the game that
at the half it would be tied, I would've taken it in a flash. The Broncos
were right where they wanted to be. But the interception for a quick 7 points
was the number-one thing they couldn't do IMO, but did. That appeared to be
the killer, because this was the type of game where one score can give you
all the cushion you need and it woke up a crowd that had expected a blowout
from the opening kickoff. And when Buffalo went up 10-zip, I *did* give up.
I figured they might go down and score, but I also figured there would only be
about 30 seconds left and they would still have the improbability of recovering
an onside kick. But when Atwater recovered that kick, I ran back into the
living room and thought, as most Bronco fans probably did, "It's gonna be
another miracle." Except this one would've made last week's comeback look
like Denver came back from a 3-0 deficit in the first quarter. This one
would've ranked up there and possibly above of The Immaculate Reception,
Dallas' victory over the Vikings in the mid-70's, and The Drive in the '86
AFC Championship game.
Back to reality. Denver's defense played the best game in Bronco playoff
history - let's leave it at that. The offense did as good a job as I've ever
seen them do with the screen pass, but that also turned out to be the killer
play. On the interception, it was a combination of two things: a good play by
Bills NT Wright, who saw the play developing and stopped rushing Elway and
backed up. But even so, Elway just threw the ball too low - the screen pass
certainly isn't one of his strong points and he's had them picked off before.
Denver may have outplayed and outgained the Bills, but it doesn't matter
because the Buffalo won the game. One of the few things the NFL has
going for it over college football IMO is that a win is a win, no matter how
you got, what the margin of victory was, or how ugly it was. Buffalo won't
drop in the polls for being unimpressive - the Bills go to Minneapolis while
Denver's season comes to an abrupt end.
So Denver and Detroit, who met way back in July, won't meet again in the Super
Bowl. Imagine what someone would've thought if you would've suggested back
then that these 2 might have a rematch in the Super Bowl??? Well, it came much
closer to happening than anyone probably could've imagined.
Look for next year's Denver-Buffalo or Denver-Washington game to be a Monday
nighter.
Joe
|
36.803 | Elway gets Bailey-slapped ! Film at 11 .... | LUNER::BROOKS | Can you say 'triangulated crossfire'? | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:11 | 1 |
|
|
36.804 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Grapefruits,Golf, and Girls | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:14 | 27 |
| Well,
Denver outplayed Buffalo yesterday - but the ghost of Rick Karlis came
up and blocked any chance they had. To me, it seems that if you stop
Buffalo's offense a few times early - they get jittery and nervous and
have all types of problems. As suggested last year during the Super
Bowl, and yesterday by Walsh - there are times when they should abandon
the no-huddle and run a 'tradional' offense. Yesterday was a case in
point. It wasn't working and they kep running the same plays over and
over and over. And they weren't working. Denver's defense played a
great game. Use the big safeties to smack everyone around. Lofton was
invisible after a few hits.
Denver blew it big time. The missed field goals hurt - but Elway was
off when he was in there. The Broncos should have chucked quick outs
to the receivers and quick over patterns to Kay. Buffalo's secondary
isn't that good. Leonard Smith hits hard - but he's more talk and show
than talent.
I had said that either Wash or Buff wouldn't make the Bowl. I was
wrong. I really felt Buffalo wouldn't make it to the show - and
yesterday was the reason why. But Denver gagged when it counted.
That onsides was a thing of beauty - only to be ruined seconds later by
Sewell's fumble.
JD
|
36.805 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Pick, BAD John | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:45 | 2 |
|
And a sigh of relief is heard throughout the Mile High City...
|
36.806 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:50 | 16 |
|
Kudos to Denver's D. You guys have seen how it usually went
for the donks this year. Steady D. I can't think of any game
this year where the D let them down.
This game was theirs. The O choked. They didn't take advantage
of the numerous opportunities they had in Buffalo territory and
it killed them. Of course, hats off to Buffalo's D for this (and
David Effin Treadwell!).
I'd hate to see Sewell catch any flack about his fumble. He pulled
Denver's butt out of many a fire this year with his play.
Leonard "I wanna be in pictures" Smith is a hot dog el grande'.
Claybroon
|
36.807 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Mon Jan 13 1992 10:53 | 5 |
| Well the Bills didn't beat the Broncos. Clearly the Broncos beat the
Broncos with too many missed opportunities in the 1st half, the attack
of the GoalPosts and a horrendous interception. Broncos did well.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.808 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Pick, BAD John | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:03 | 2 |
|
Anyone else have visions of Rich Karlis??
|
36.809 | I don't think so | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:12 | 1 |
| Anybody know a bookie like /Don that gives a floating line?
|
36.810 | wretched puke | FRETZ::HEISER | back to Shalla-Bal | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:37 | 1 |
| How about that "Bid Bad John"?
|
36.811 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Can you say 'triangulated crossfire'? | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:00 | 7 |
| Small Lame,
Got a trade for ya .... Treadwell for Del Greco. Straight up.
Whadda say ?
Doc
|
36.812 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Can you say 'triangulated crossfire'? | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:01 | 1 |
| Shall we start a MrT watch ?
|
36.813 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Pick, BAD John | Mon Jan 13 1992 12:07 | 5 |
|
Leave T alone. He's got a terrible dilemma. Wants terribly to get
into the Dean note, but knows he's got to come here, also and talk
about John, Pick, Bad John. It'll be fun seeing his excuse for only
being able to get into the Dean note.
|
36.814 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Mon Jan 13 1992 14:24 | 22 |
|
Like I said in the AFC Playoffs note... Great Game.
To lay the blame for a Bronco loss on any one person on
the team is simply not right. The Elway Int. wasn't the
sole reason they lost. The Treadwell misses wasn't the
sole reason they lost. The Sewell Fumble wasn't the reason
they lost and the Conservitive play calling in the red
zone wasn't the sole reason they lost. The Broncos lost
because of a combbination of all of these things. If Treadwell
makes one field goal the thing hits OT. If Elway doesn't throw
the INT it still 0-0 if Sewell holds on maybe they get another
score. If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
a blow out. Who really know what might have been. the facts are
that Denver wasn't good enough when it counted to make it back
to the SB. I say, Great Season... Hope the Bill's don't get crushed
by the `Skins. Denvers Defense was great !!!
Big Game
Give me my Crow now please, it's lunch time !
Big Game Hunta
|
36.815 | Big-Bad-WHO ???? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Jan 13 1992 14:27 | 14 |
| Well, looks like the Elway we all know and love showed up this weekend.
You know, as a Raider fan I'm always getting grief from the Donk
faithful about Schroeder choking in the big games, but it seems to me
that they've got their own version of Schroeder up in Pile-it-high....
...As long as the doinks have Elway they'll never get a ring, and the
thing about bursting g-strings....forget it! The only part of Elway's
anatomy that resembles a horse is still his face. As per usual, when
Elway pulls a choke, he feigned an injury to try and save face...loser!
The donk defense had a good game...or did the Bills offense just have a
bad one? hmmmm?.....Oh well, the doinks lasted one game past the faids,
and like the faids they'll be watching the Superbowl from their
lazy-boyz...
Carlos
|
36.816 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 13 1992 14:36 | 4 |
| �If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
� a blow out.
I thought Big Bad John called all of his own plays now.
|
36.817 | I almost wished Kubiak pulled it off | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Mon Jan 13 1992 14:45 | 14 |
| <<< Note 36.816 by CNTROL::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
�If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
� a blow out.
>>> I thought Big Bad John called all of his own plays now.
Check that Mac, he reads his own plays. 10 years in the league and still
has to read the plays off an armband. What a brain surgeon...
Sorry Jack I don't buy it Elway is most definately at fault for this one.
All those early possesions at the 50 or better and no scores???
|
36.818 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Mon Jan 13 1992 14:45 | 9 |
|
Carlos... Give it a rest... Elway is ten times the QB that Jay
will ever be. John will be in the HOF.. Jay shouldn't even think
about it.
John was calling his plays for awhile. If you noticed during this
game, Most if not all of the plays came in from the sidelines.
Big Game Hunta
|
36.819 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:02 | 11 |
| Big Game, my point wasn't that Schroeder is a better QB than Elfwad,
Lord knows I don't think that, just that lasted week you guys thought
she was the greatest QB to walk the planet, and I was just trying to
help reality set in....he's good but he's not great, a great QB wins
the 'Big Game' and Elway just doesn't know how to do this. He might
make it into the HoF, but it'll likely be because of his personality
and off field accomplishments (he's a media darling you know) that get
him there. JMHO! Speaking of HoF material, I think uncle Al, and Ray
Guy will make it this year.
Carlos
|
36.820 | It certainly wasn't 51-3 now, was it? | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:14 | 27 |
| > You know, as a Raider fan I'm always getting grief from the Donk
> faithful about Schroeder choking in the big games, but it seems to me
> that they've got their own version of Schroeder up in Pile-it-high....
Once in a while quarterbacks have off days, and yes, Elway had one
yesterday. At least his team *gets* to the big games - Schroeder's
been to ONE AFC title game. BTW, how'd Kelly do yesterday?
> As per usual, when
> Elway pulls a choke, he feigned an injury to try and save face...loser!
Juvenile comment.
> the doinks lasted one game past the faids,
> and like the faids they'll be watching the Superbowl from their
> lazy-boyz...
Let me help you with your math a little here. It was TWO games past
the Faids.
We don't appreciate you coming in here making these ridiculous comments
just because your mighty Pride and Poise boys closed out the season with
four straight losses!
Joe
|
36.821 | Uncle Al Will Buy His Way Into HOF ~/~ | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:14 | 9 |
| Saying Elway can't win the big games is really out there Carlos.
John has led his team into 3 SB's which means he has won 3 AFC
championship game which you have stated are big games. John is
a great QB. His Int was not the only reason the Broncos lost.
I really don't want to get into this kind of crap. the Broncos had a
great season, they lost to the Bills Fair & Square. Now, Lets
hope the Bills can win the Big one for the AFC !
Big Game
|
36.822 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Introspective....Make A Statement | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:49 | 18 |
|
>> If Treadwell
>> makes one field goal the thing hits OT. If Elway doesn't throw
>> the INT it still 0-0 if Sewell holds on maybe they get another
>> score. If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
>> a blow out.
Little'n'Lame,
If, If, If!!!!!
If your uncle had t*ts you'd call him Aunt!!!!! (8^)*
Good P-Name, Mr. Hunted
JaKe
|
36.823 | Elway's career ain't over yet! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Jan 13 1992 15:58 | 12 |
| I did notice some new p-names in here today. What happened BG? Did
you lose to Jake or Mike?
BG & Joe, just remember your dealing with Carlos (faids fan) when
defending the donks. The Broncos lost by 3, nothin to be ashamed of.
Stating Elway faked his injury and is a loser is lame. If I heard
correctly yesterday, Elway has the highest winning % since 83. If
this is incorrect, then so was the TV or radio jock that I heard it
from.
Tim
|
36.824 | Elway has most wins partly because he plays most games | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 13 1992 16:25 | 19 |
|
> If I heard
> correctly yesterday, Elway has the highest winning % since 83. If
> this is incorrect, then so was the TV or radio jock that I heard it
> from.
I believe that Elway has more *wins* than any other QB in that period,
not the highest winning percentage. The major reason for this is that
Elway is probably the most durable QB in the league. Correct me if I'm
wrong, but I'm pretty sure that Joe Montana and maybe some others have
a higher winning percentage than Elway (and Montana and his backups
have more wins, which is another way of saying the 49ers have won more
games than the Broncos in the time period).
Hey, I think Carlos is full of it on Elway too, Big Game, but after all
that bull you slung last week you've got it coming, dontcha think?
glenn
|
36.825 | The comma police | SHALOT::MEDVID | not one ounce or inch of control | Mon Jan 13 1992 16:27 | 9 |
| After attaining god-like status a week ago, Elway affectionatly became
"Big Bad John"
After yesterday's performance, add a comma to that monicker to make it
"Big, Bad John"
Thank you.
--dan'l
|
36.826 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Mon Jan 13 1992 17:43 | 9 |
|
Glenn, You're proably right about that (Me deserving some trash)
But for someone to say that one the leagues greatest QB's faked an
injury in outragous.
Elway's winning percentage in higher than anyone in the league...
Marino is right behind him for the period of 83 - Today
Big Game
|
36.827 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Mon Jan 13 1992 17:45 | 8 |
| I personally didn't think Elway had that bad of a day until the
obvious TO. Its hard to have a great day when you don't have time to
throw the ball.
Next year, the Broncos still need good OL & DL!!! Once they get that
area covered, then they can play with the best IMO.
Tim
|
36.828 | Nexted year! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Jan 13 1992 17:46 | 29 |
| >�As per usual, when Elway pulls a choke, he feigned an injury to try
�and >save face...loser!
>
>Juvenile comment.
Yeah well....out of the mouths of babes, and besides it was just my
observation, seems like he always pulls this junk when he's in an
uncomfortable situation, heck he couldn't even finish the post game
interview 'cause he was feeling a little woozy....I realize how this
must hurt some of youze tho, especially with all that macho, he-man,
g-string popping junk you guys was shovelling lasted week.
>At least his team *gets* to the big games _ Schroeders been to one AFC
>Title game.
And I suppose this is a highly intellectual comment...get a life!
Schroeders also only been in the AFC for about three years. (though he
probably will never get their again for the Raiders???)
>Let me help you with your math a little here. It was two games past
>the Faids.
Depends on how you look at it, the Raiders lost their first playoff
contest while the Donks won their first and lost the second....thus
making it to one game further than the Faids. It doesn't really matter
anyhow, they'll both be couch potatoes for the big one.
Carlos
|
36.829 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Mon Jan 13 1992 17:54 | 6 |
|
Can't wait till nexted year... Todd M. is gonna get a real intro to
the NFL. Count 2 sure wins for the Donks against the Faiders Nexted
year !!
|
36.830 | and the faithful suck it up and wonder why not us? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Tue Jan 14 1992 08:29 | 15 |
|
I too though Elway was giving us the hollywood treatment wiht the injury.
He didn't eve get hit on his thigh with the ground or a player on that
scramble he came up lame on...
and then I read this last night quote by BBJ
"I had a little window there, Wright got his hand in there, I should have
made the tackle."
huh? Hey John maybe just maybe you shouldn't have thrown the pass considering
where you were on the field. His goddam ego won't allow him to admit he made
a mistake...
mike
|
36.831 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Tue Jan 14 1992 08:37 | 4 |
| In all fairness to Mr Ed, if you look at the replay of when he got
injured, someone's hand, caint remember if it was someone else's or Ed's
own hoof, was between his thigh and the ground when he hit the turf.
Denny
|
36.832 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknight | Tue Jan 14 1992 08:48 | 5 |
| ...and in all fairness for Mr Ed, Wright pulled back at just the
right time. The Buffalo defense made a great read and adjusted
at just the right time.
/Don
|
36.833 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Tue Jan 14 1992 11:04 | 14 |
|
> ...and in all fairness for Mr Ed, Wright pulled back at just the
> right time. The Buffalo defense made a great read and adjusted
> at just the right time.
Cmon now Slasher Wright was right in front. Big Bad John saw him stop, he
had time to pull the ball back and go to another option but Mr. Miracle-
work's ego took over and told him he could get that ball through there.
After all he's Big Bad John the meanest hombre in the NFL.
yeah right...
mike
|
36.834 | Which has been the knock on Elway all along... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1992 11:15 | 9 |
|
Elway had both Wright and Carlton Bailey in the vicinity of the screen.
If one didn't get a paw on the ball, the other would have (actually,
bothdid eventually). It was a very poor decision throwing into the
area, regardless of whether the defense read the screen or not. That's
what checking off your defense is for...
glenn
|
36.835 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Tue Jan 14 1992 11:21 | 12 |
|
If the ball get through, it a really big play. You guys can slam
John all you want, thats ok. It's just to bad that the teams you
have made your own didn't make it as far as the Broncos did this year.
You know Childs... If i didn't know you were such a Butt Head I might
actually get pissed off about your silly assed comments. But... When
I consider the source of the garbage that is being spewed I only say
to myself "It's just that Jerk Mikey Childs, the clueless one" and go
on with my day. When your team make the championship game again,
we'll talk !!
Big Game
|
36.836 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Howard Roark laughed. | Tue Jan 14 1992 13:33 | 10 |
|
Gee Big Game, for someone who says he's not a Donks fanatic
you sure get mighty upset when people rag on 'em. The fact
of the matter is that the Denver defense deserved a better
fate - they played excellently. As for 'Big Bad John', his per-
formance Sunday speaks for itself. Buffalo gave him excellent
field position on virtually every possession and he didn't get
it done.
|
36.837 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Tue Jan 14 1992 14:18 | 14 |
|
Jack atleast when my teams make the championship game they win....I also
have never claimed any of my players to be the greatest thing since sliced
bread.
face it man Elway is a big dumb athletic QB who's claim to fame is late
game comebacks which for the most part have been 20% brains and 80% brawn.
He's never led the league in passing %, yardages, or TDS. He may have led
the league in intys or placed second a few times only cause Testeverdi is
in the league...
you have a good day now pal...
mike
|
36.838 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Jan 14 1992 14:45 | 10 |
| If I had a nickle in my pocket for every Bronco loss they shoulda
won, I'd get hernia just trying to get up out of my chair.
No one can convince me that Buffalo is a far superior team.
The Broncos know their shortcomings and can build from that.
They'll be back and so will I. See you all late next summer
when the pre-season schedule winds down. It already looks like
92 is going to be a very good year.
later,
Bob on Broncos
|
36.839 | Biased...? Who me..? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Jan 14 1992 14:50 | 19 |
| >I also have never claimed any of my players to be the greatest thing
>since sliced bread.
Good point Mr. Childs, although I doubt it will be taken. As long as
Elway's been the QB for the doinks the reasons for his poor performance
have been the lack of a running attack, or lack of a decent TE, or
because of poor play of the O-line, or anything other than Big Dolt
John. Despite my earlier (and constant, within this notesfile) bashing
of Elway, I think that he has demonstrated flashes of brilliance (ala
the Houston game) throughout his career and Elway fans would have us to
believe that this is the total embodiment (sp?) of Elway with the
exception of an occasional bad game or two. But it is only cause they
choose to look the other way, or place blame elsewhere, when the Mr.
Hyde half of Elway shows up (ala the Buffalo game). I realize that no
QB (or person for that matter) is perfect, but trying to sell us on
Elway having an occasional bad game is just not dealing with reality.
It's more like every other week.
Carlos
|
36.840 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Tue Jan 14 1992 15:01 | 9 |
|
YAP ! YAP ! YAP !
You guys sound like Clevelane fans !!
;^)
Big Game Junta
|
36.841 | Talk trash and you get garbage in return | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Back to shoveling snow again (Uugh) | Tue Jan 14 1992 15:10 | 6 |
| From the recent replies, I thought Denver fans and Cleveland fans
were one and the same thing.
:-)
Scott
|
36.842 | Moon criticized for catchable passes; Bills didn't drop Elway's | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1992 15:11 | 9 |
|
The most delicious irony is that the Bronco fans who were bashing DrM
last week for claiming the Oilers were the better team in their game
are now making the exact same excuses for their beloved Donks! All
except one particularly outspoken Donk fan who hasn't been seen hide
nor hair of since, that is...
glenn
|
36.843 | Someones obviously envious!!!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:14 | 8 |
| Glenn, are I included in that last statement? If so, go back
through the replies to show me where I said the better team didn't win
at Buffalo, then I will agree with you, but until then I think your
statement is full of it, and not TOTALLY true!
The Broncos (treadweel & biff) beat themselves. Buffalo didn't!
Tim
|
36.844 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Gilligan,Gomer,Jethro,Elway | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:22 | 7 |
| Re -1
Another classic example of Doinky Denial, as it's known in physc
circles. The donks never lose because of Elway's poor play, or because
of the other teams good play.....go figure.
Carlos
|
36.845 | Glad you clarified that, Tim... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:31 | 15 |
|
> Glenn, are I included in that last statement?
No, Tim, I left it at those Bronco fans who were criticizing DrM for
stating that the Oilers beat themselves (missed field goal, dropped TD
passes) and then turned around and moaned that the Broncos did the
same in the Buffalo game.
> The Broncos (treadweel & biff) beat themselves. Buffalo didn't!
With this comment I might have to re-consider, though... who was that
team that had the 10 next to their name on the scoreboard to Denver's 7?
glenn
|
36.846 | You Guys Ain't Worth Conversing With !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:32 | 7 |
| Hey... Show me one note where I said that the better team didn't
win. Just one !! Also, Show me where I said that Elway had no
part in the loss. You guys got you head up... Well, you know what
I mean. I love how the Anti-Donks come crawling out of the woodwork
after an important Broncos loss. Give me a break !!
Big Game Junta
|
36.847 | Is it camp time already? | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:43 | 6 |
| I was testing you Glenn, with the last statement anyway.
Carlos, go back and read it again. Maybe I need to exlain, but it
probably wouldn't do any good;^)
Tim
|
36.848 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 14 1992 17:44 | 13 |
|
Hey, no one mentioned your name, either, Big Game, so if you don't fit
the description, quit sounding so paranoid...
> I love how the Anti-Donks come crawling out of the woodwork
> after an important Broncos loss.
Which would explain the level of activity in here last week after an
important Broncos' win, including some timely comments on an another
impending Elway crash-and-burn against a quality defense...
glenn
|
36.849 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Tue Jan 14 1992 18:28 | 8 |
|
Hey glenn! Were you talking about me? :*)
Make that a big ole :*)
Tim, quit worrying so much about what these guys think.
Claybroon
|
36.850 | Smileys go here... | ROYALT::ASHE | Note new node name... | Tue Jan 14 1992 19:00 | 2 |
| I hope you weren't talking about me, because I didn't read most of the
notes, and wouldn't want to be paranoid for no reason...
|
36.851 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Tue Jan 14 1992 19:07 | 3 |
| Yea, Tim... You worry to much about these Wardlevanes...
Big Game Junta
|
36.852 | it's only a game it's only a game it's only a game
| CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean & BBJ two of a kind | Wed Jan 15 1992 06:51 | 4 |
|
I'm not going to say nuthin, just want to take a break to laugh..
hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
|
36.853 | Get the *light* schedual and see what happens | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | | Wed Jan 15 1992 12:24 | 7 |
|
SEASONS OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEH!
AAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
36.854 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Jan 15 1992 12:47 | 14 |
| Mike, if you want a laugh, just look in the mirror.....
See lame huh? Kinda hit home with ya?;^))))
|
36.855 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93 | Wed Jan 15 1992 16:57 | 9 |
| Lasted quite a bit longer than the Clowns though.... BTW,
when was the last time (In modern history) the the `Spots
made it to a conference championship game. I can think of
a few time they were close but got slamed by the Mighty
Broncos.
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Big Game
|
36.856 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nude up and Note | Thu Jan 16 1992 08:02 | 14 |
| > Lasted quite a bit longer than the Clowns though.... BTW,
> when was the last time (In modern history) the the `Spots
> made it to a conference championship game. I can think of
> a few time they were close but got slamed by the Mighty
> Broncos.
They played the Broncos for the Conference Championship in 1986.
Cleveland had the best record that year in the AFC.
The Broncos won, and went on to be squashed by the Giants in the
Super Bowl.
hth,
'Saw
|
36.857 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jan 16 1992 08:07 | 3 |
| Didn't the Donks beat Cleve. in a couple other conference
champeenship games too? Anyone know how they did after those games?
Denny 8^o
|
36.858 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Introspective...Make a Statement | Thu Jan 16 1992 17:01 | 6 |
| The Donks beat the Brown(spot)s(tm) in the 1989 AFC Championship game,
and, true to form, went on to get smeared on the wall by the 49ers in
the Super Bowl.
JaKe
|
36.859 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Wed Jan 22 1992 15:55 | 12 |
| As you probably already know, Reeves fired Shanahan as offensive
coordinator because their not on the same page offensively
philosophically. I have no comment on that.
But then I heard that the leading candidate to replace Shanahan is
DAN HENNING. I think that's a wonderful idea. Henning is just the one
to work with Reeves. He's submissively brilliant and will work up an
offensive game plan given Reeves' parameters. He's run-oriented, as
Reeves is and you can see how well his offensive genius has worked in
San Diego and Atlanta. This is a fine choice! ;-) ~/~
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.860 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Jan 22 1992 15:57 | 2 |
| I thought for sure the Donks would grab Joe Walton.
Denny
|
36.861 | | CELTIK::JACOB | Ushering in a new era... | Wed Jan 22 1992 16:00 | 6 |
| Heard here in Pgh that Walton may be headed cross-state to the Eagles.
Pity the Eagles if this is true!!!
JaKe
|
36.862 | Titles and Acquisitions galore there! | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Wed Jan 22 1992 17:03 | 8 |
|
Other Bronco tidbits:
Simon Fletcher frequented one of my favorite spots in Denver,
Shotgun Willie's, the other night and dotted some guys eye.
He was arrested........
Claybroon
|
36.863 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Wed Jan 22 1992 17:04 | 8 |
| Thanks for bummin me out. The donks don't need those guys!
Shannahan hasn't done much since returning from faiders. Uncle Al
musta "paid" him well. As a matter o fact, the Broncos haven't beaten
the faids since Shanahan came back....Suspicous?
Mike had his good offensive years before he went to faids.
Tim
|
36.864 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 22 1992 18:55 | 6 |
| I wasn't too excited to see Henning's name at the top of the list
either, Glenn. The biggest reason for Shanahan's firing was that he
wanted more responsibility than Reeves wanted to give him.
Joe
|
36.865 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jan 23 1992 08:58 | 2 |
| Henning was hired yesterday as the new offensive coordinator
for Detroit.
|
36.866 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Where Ever You Are,There You Are | Thu Jan 23 1992 10:09 | 3 |
| GOOD...
BG
|
36.867 | Has this been brought up in Denver? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 23 1992 10:44 | 13 |
|
> I wasn't too excited to see Henning's name at the top of the list
> either, Glenn. The biggest reason for Shanahan's firing was that he
> wanted more responsibility than Reeves wanted to give him.
Does Reeves have some kind of problem with the authority of underlings?
Just seems like quite a few respected assistants who have been around
the Broncos for years have gotten the boot lately. Most of them are
now employed by the New England Patriots, right?
glenn
|
36.868 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Jan 23 1992 11:32 | 5 |
| Most of our current defensive staff has a Denver connection - Defensive
Coordinator Joe Collier, DL Coach Stan Jones, LB Coach Myrel Moore and
DB Coach Charlie West. Mac was also at Denver from 1967-70.
John
|
36.869 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jan 23 1992 17:35 | 22 |
|
> Does Reeves have some kind of problem with the authority of underlings?
> Just seems like quite a few respected assistants who have been around
> the Broncos for years have gotten the boot lately. Most of them are
> now employed by the New England Patriots, right?
Glenn W.,
The firing of Collier and the rest of the defensive coaching staff
following the '88 season was for different reasons. The 1988 version
of the Bronco defense was a sieve and the Bronco organization decided
it was time for a new defensive coaching structure.
Now I wasn't too crazy about the Shanahan firing myself. When Shanahan
was running the offense in '87 they were very productive, and I don't
think he had as much of a role in running things this past season
as he had in '87. Reeves wants to be the offensive coordinator as well
as head coach, so I guess what he's actually looking for is an
'assistant' offensive coordinator.
Joe
|
36.870 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Thu Jan 23 1992 18:26 | 6 |
| Henning turned Reeves down and accepted the offensive coordinator job
at Detroit. I don't understand this. Why would a run-oriented coach
accept an offensive coordinator position on a r&s team? The only
reason I can think of is to expand his horizons.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.871 | Barry over tackle for 2 yds, up the middle for 3 more ... yawn | EARRTH::BROOKS | MrT = Craven WeenieVane | Thu Jan 23 1992 18:56 | 1 |
| There goes the Lions ....
|
36.872 | | DECWET::METZGER | /Slasher welshes on a bet? | Thu Jan 23 1992 19:31 | 8 |
|
Zactly what I was thinking DOc.
Why one of the most exciting offensive teams in footbal would hire Dan Henning
as an offensive coordinator is beyond me. Sort of like Hiring Joe Walton to
be your offensive coordinator or little Shula to be your head coach...
Metz
|
36.873 | sigh... | ROYALT::ASHE | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,Deliverance Dude | Fri Jan 24 1992 00:38 | 1 |
| Dan Henning Offensive Coord... Raymond Berry QB coach....
|
36.874 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Jan 24 1992 08:23 | 2 |
| Kinda like hiring Ray Barry as Qb coach eh?
Denny
|
36.875 | | LUNER::BROOKS | MrT = Craven WeenieVane | Fri Jan 24 1992 10:18 | 13 |
| In fairness to Henning, he was the OC for some of Washington's better
teams under Gibbs (after his (Henning's) tenure as Atlanta's coach),
but that was the one-back, multi-TE offense.
I guess Fontes still wants to modify the R&S some more. I fear he's
going to really screw it up. I hope he doesn't forget that while Barry
would be great in any offense, the R&S makes him especially lethal, due
to the fact that 4-WR's makes it very difficult for opponents to stack
7 and 8 men near the line.
Ask the Cowboys if you don't believe me ....
Doc
|
36.876 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 11:22 | 31 |
| Wouldn't it be funny if the Lions next year made the Super Bowl? I
think it would.
Imagine if the Lions did modify the R&S even more - and gosh forbid -
got a little boring. Imagine if Rodney Peete lasted a whole year in
that formation.
Imagine if Henning and Berry put in more controlled rollouts by Peete.
Just imagine.
Therman Thomas doesn't play in a run and shoot - but he does in a hurry
up. Hasn't hurt his numbers, now has it? Why is it automatically
assumed that Sanders would suffer? If he's as great a back as he seems
to be, he should be able to prosper in any offense.
Houston has been the only team to run the R&S consistently. The reason
being that Warren Moon has remained (luckily) relatively injury-free.
Detroit has not had that luxury. From observing both teams - and I do
realize that Detroit's o-line is not up to par with Houston's - that
Moon is much more under control - more of a pocket attack than the
Lions. IMO, the R&S - like ALL offensive schemes, needs an above
average offensive line. The big mistake the Lions made was going to
the R&S before they had even a semblance of a line.
I also don't understand why you can't run the R&S with a
multi-tightend. Sanders, 2 wide-outs and 2 tight ends still gives ya
5 options. And by doing seam passes to the tight ends, or crossing
clear outs over the middle, you would open up the outside game.
JD
|
36.877 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Jan 24 1992 13:04 | 6 |
| Buffalo does have a form of R&S. I think they use the 3 WRs 1 TE &
Whiney RB. Its obviously effective for them since they had the #1
offense this year. Kelly & co always keeps the defense offguard by
throwing in all situations.
Tj
|
36.878 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 13:23 | 4 |
| So Tim, does every hurry up offense automatically qualify as a R&S?
I think not.
JD
|
36.879 | Who cares what you call it? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 24 1992 13:44 | 16 |
|
> So Tim, does every hurry up offense automatically qualify as a R&S?
> I think not.
No, but they're all essentially wimpy girlymon offenses, which is your
objection, right? I mean if the ball's in the air all the time, from
an aesthetic viewpoint it doesn't really doesn't much matter what the
technical details are...
I kind of like the variety and the pitting of true innovations one
against the other. As opposed to baseball, which remains constant, in
a lot of ways that's what football is all about (beyond the core,
physical contact).
glenn
|
36.880 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:10 | 10 |
| Glenn -
I"ve never called the Bills offense a wimpy girly-mon offense. Though
Andre Reed did go into a shell last year after getting whacked around
by the manly Giants. ;-)
Plus, in last year's super bowl, I was more impressed with the Bills
running attack then passing attack. Both td's were on the ground.
JD
|
36.881 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | MrT = Craven WeenieVane | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:13 | 30 |
| Good one Glenn. JD is now trying to ease in to the Buffalo camp, even
though they were the epitome of 'girly-mon' and 'wimp' football style
this time lasted year.
As for why you can't run a R&S with two TE's, you can if the TE's are
quick - most are not. Remember that the *inside* receivers in the R&S
are usually the most dangerous, and also have the most reads to make,
hence adjustments in their pass routes. TE's are more susceptable to
being jammed, have the reaction time of a battleship, and most of all
(IMO), can still be covered (a lot of the time) by LB's and safeties.
One advantage of the R&S is that you force the defense to use personel
in ways they never planned to. The defense has to use 5 and 6 DB's far
more than they would like to. One-dimensional run-stuffing LB's have to
be pulled, and havoc is wreaked. With 2 TE's, the defense isn't
required to adjust as drastically.
Finally, the Lions run the R&S differently from Houston in these ways :
1) The Lions use more 1/2 rolls than Houston.
2) The Lion QB's run more than Houston's.
3) The Lions's employ more screen passes and run the ball more than
Houston.
4) Houston has superior WR's and OL than Detroit.
5) Houston goes to their outside receivers more outside the 20.
Some of this is dictated by personel, and some by the variance in
offensive philosophy of Mouse Davis vs. Kevin Gilbride.
Doc
|
36.882 | | CRLPS::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:18 | 5 |
| � I"ve never called the Bills offense a wimpy girly-mon offense.
Maybe not in those exact words, but you did put in some pretty
dispargaging remarks about the hurry-up offense and tried to back them
up by pointing out how they were beaten by the "smash-mouth" Giants.
|
36.883 |
whir,whir,whiz,whir
| DECWET::METZGER | /Slasher welshes on a bet? | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:27 | 29 |
|
JD,
You better stop spinning like a top or you're going to get real dizzy and
chunder.
The biggest problem with modifying the R&S to have 2 TE's instead of 2 wr's is
the fact that there aren't many good TE's in the pro-game. There are very few
TE's that can both block and pass receive.
If you had a TE tandem like Kellen Winslow and Keith Jackson you could run
this modified R&S because you could split both of them out to keep the defense
honest and they would have the speed to force them to be covered by a DB
instead of a LB.
Face it. Most of the time you see a TE go for big yardage is when they hide
out on the line and get lost and then go upfield. Usually it's a result of
blown coverage instead of a great route by the TE.
The only team with the quality Te's needed for this would be Dallas. With
Jay Novchek and Robert Awalt. Although Awalt is more of a blocker than a
reciever.
Just take a look at the TE's going to the pro bowl and you'll see a real
lack of quality in the position.
Metz
|
36.884 | | GENRAL::WADE | Whose idea was it to hang these ferns? | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:50 | 5 |
|
Hey! Get all this R&S talk out of this *pristine* Bronco
note will ya! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.885 | ha ha | FRETZ::HEISER | imagination > knowledge | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:54 | 2 |
| But this pristine Bronco offense has won as many Super Bowls as the R&S
offense!
|
36.886 | Spin this | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:02 | 43 |
| Doc -
Where am I easing into the Bills camp? What the hell are you talking
about. I've never heard the Bills offense called anything other than
hurry-up or no-huddle. They use the tight end effectively (you could
read the article about that in USA Today, BTW...)
Mac -
I'm not the only person who thinks that the Bills could benefit, at
times, by slowing down. That was brought up many times after last
years' Super Bowl - when it was blatantly obvious thatthe defense
needed some rest time. It was brought up by Walsh in the Denver game.
And teh whole idea of Bill Belechik's defense last year was to let the
Bills catch the stuff over the middle - and then whack them. Andre
Reed, for example, had a good first period. He caught some balls, took
some licks. He got creamed on one hit - and he was never the same.
The defense was "Big guys hitting little guys" as SI put it.
Metz -
No spin by me. I merely said that I think Barry Sanders would be a
great runner in any offense. Again, I ask - do you disagree? Do you
(and DOC) think that he can only play in run and shoot? Do you
disagree that Thurman Thomas has excelled? I brought that point up.
And the tight end scheme could work, IMO. The one thing using tight
ends does is it doesn't allow for 6 or 7 defensive back schemes. Teams
keep the linebackers in. So where's the spin?
And to all three of ya - do you think there's any correlation to the
way Detroit used the R&S and the high incidence of their QB's getting
hurt? Wasn't one of the largest factors in the improvement of the
LIons this year the FACT that their defense played much, much better
than in past years? Werent' Houston's AND Atlanta's defenses much
better also? Everyone jumps on the offense's bandwagon - but the
defense has to be there.
And also, ALL, are folks modifying the definition of the Run and Shoot
to include any team that passes more than runs? Then just about every
team must be run and shoot! I guess the Marino led Dolphins and Fouts
led Chargers and Boomer led Bengals are all R&S teams...
JD
|
36.887 | | CRLPS::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:18 | 14 |
| � And to all three of ya - do you think there's any correlation to the
� way Detroit used the R&S and the high incidence of their QB's getting
� hurt?
It's a fact that teams running the R&S give up more sacks than those
running conventional offenses. I've never said differently. In fact,
I've often pointed out some of the perceived shortcomings in the R&S.
�Everyone jumps on the offense's bandwagon - but the
� defense has to be there.
You're spinning like a top here, JD. You're the one who keeps asking
has the R&S won any champeenships one minute and then says defense wins
champeenships the next.
|
36.888 | Maybe it's the QB... | ROYALT::ASHE | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,Deliverance Dude | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:22 | 3 |
| Maybe Peete's injury prone... he was hurt a couple times in college
right? I mean do you consider the Eagles a R&S team? They've had
a lot of QB's get hurt...
|
36.889 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Where Ever You Are, There You Are | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:22 | 3 |
| THERMAL IS A WHINER !!
BG
|
36.890 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:11 | 11 |
| Mac -
I never mentions championships once today.
But I think I understand you, Doc and Metz. Say only things that you
guys wanna hear. ANything else is spinning. Thanks for clearing it
up.
And all I hear is how superior the R&S is, yet its proven nothing.
JD
|
36.891 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:17 | 11 |
|
> And all I hear is how superior the R&S is, yet its proven nothing.
I honestly wasn't trying to tick you off, JD, was just looking for a
clarification: is it the run-and-shoot that bothers you or the fact
that it's a pass-oriented offense? I thought it was the latter. It
has been shown that other non-R & S offenses throw the ball with a
similarly high percentage...
glenn
|
36.892 | | CRLPS::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:22 | 24 |
| � I never mentions championships once today.
Who said anything about today. I was commentating based on many of
your previous comments about R&S and other "gimmick" offenses, and
"smash-mouth" offenses.
� But I think I understand you, Doc and Metz. Say only things that you
� guys wanna hear. ANything else is spinning. Thanks for clearing it
� up.
Look in a mirror JD. Talk about hearing only what you want to hear,
check out this next sentence:
� And all I hear is how superior the R&S is, yet its proven nothing.
You've heard that it is a viable offense. It has proven that it can
help take teams to the NFL playoffs. It has proven that it can add
another dimension to a "smash-mouth" football team. And if by proving
anything you mean that it hasn't won a champeenship (there's that word
today), it's a non-sequiter since by your own admission, defense wins
championships. That could definitely be supported by the Oiler loss to
the Broncos. The R&S definitely put enough points on the board to win
a football game, did chew up some clock, but the D didn't come through
to stop the Bronco 2 minute drill.
|
36.893 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Pop Pop goes the weasel, the weasel... | Fri Jan 24 1992 16:27 | 1 |
| I don't think anyone said it was superior, just a real alternative...
|
36.894 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 17:26 | 26 |
| Glenn -
Actually I only have a strong dislike for the R&S - especially when
played by teams that are dome teams. Doesn't seem like real football
to me.
MAc -
You're right. It has proven that it can get teams into the playoffs.
However, since its inception, I've read and heard about it being super
fantastic - the greatest - etc. But so far, the teams that use it
haven't one a championship (yep, there's the word). And not just a
Super Bowl C-word, but even a conference c-word. I hear about how
boring other offenses are - offenses that have won c-words. And use,
my assertion - and it isn't a revelation - is that defense wins
c-words.
Walt -
Yep, it is an alternative. But, so far, no matter what wrinkles
offensive folks have thought up, defenses catch up. And c-word teams
tend to be those who use older (or boring) type offenses, with good
defenses (or great defenses). Perhaps it's all genetics. More
little guys out there than big guys.
JD
|
36.895 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Jan 24 1992 17:34 | 1 |
| What they said JD!~
|
36.896 | | CRLPS::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 24 1992 17:35 | 32 |
| � Actually I only have a strong dislike for the R&S - especially when
� played by teams that are dome teams. Doesn't seem like real football
� to me.
Ah, we finally get to the root of the matter. At least guys like Mike
Childs will state right up front that it's personal opiniated bias.
� However, since its inception, I've read and heard about it being super
� fantastic - the greatest - etc.
Obviously we're not reading and hearing the same things. Like you
said, people read and hear what they want I guess. And you haven't
heard these things from me. In fact when I first entered the R&S
discussion it was to point out what I had read about the R&S
shortcomings.
�I hear about how
� boring other offenses are - offenses that have won c-words. And use,
� my assertion - and it isn't a revelation - is that defense wins
� c-words.
So when it comes right down to it what you're saying is that the teams
that have been employing the R&S haven't had championship caliber
defenses. Funny, I haven't heard anyone disagree with you on this.
�And c-word teams
� tend to be those who use older (or boring) type offenses, with good
� defenses (or great defenses).
I don't think I ever heard the word older or boring used in conjuction
with the offense of the San Francisco 49'ers. In fact, the most often
used terms were probably wimpy and girly-mon.
|
36.897 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 17:55 | 19 |
| Mac -
I've said numerous times IN MY OPINION ( or have used IMO) - if you or
Doc or Metz have a hard time with that - its your problem. I've said
the dome-team thang countless times.
I believe MrT was the only person I ever read call the Niners offense
wimpy and girly-mon. That's one person. I could use Doc as a counter
example to refute all that you've said.
But then again, Doc is the R&S's strongest proponent - so that goes a
long way to explaining its worth. ;-)
Oh, and when I said I've read and heard about the R&S - I'm talking
about outside publications. The offense of the nineties. The
unstoppable offense. The wave of the future. Etc. Not what I've read
in here.
JD
|
36.898 | | DECWET::METZGER | /Slasher welshes on a bet? | Fri Jan 24 1992 18:38 | 12 |
|
Whirrrrrr, whirrrrrrr, whizzzzzzzz
JD,
How about listing all the criteria for a real football team in here? They
we would have one place where we could reference as to your girly-man football
ramblings. You change the criteria as much as you changed the criteria as to
what makes a #1 college team....
Metz
|
36.899 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | R U pre-mousse or post mousse? | Fri Jan 24 1992 18:40 | 4 |
| The only criteria is they have a football and enough guys to field a
team.
JD
|
36.900 | | LUNER::BROOKS | By The Time I Get To Arizona ! | Mon Jan 27 1992 10:03 | 7 |
| I never said that the R&S is the cat's meow, just that it is viable,
fun, and can work in this league.
If you have a problem with it, try to base it on facts, not on a bad
case of testosterone poisoning ...
DOc
|
36.901 | | QUASER::HUNTER | JaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !! | Mon Jan 27 1992 12:54 | 7 |
| Broncos to the Bowl in `93... Look for another return to the
AFC championship game for the Donks this year. Denver would
have pummeled the `Skins yesterday... ;^)
BG
|
36.902 | | FMCSSE::BROWN | I met Dynamo Hum last night | Mon Jan 27 1992 14:23 | 14 |
|
Jack,
Don't kid yourself. No body was going to be the Skin's on 26-Jan-92
Especically them damn donkey's.
Since denver has the NFC East on their schedule next your we'll
see how they do. They might get by Pheonix again.
Cadzilla
|
36.903 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | BoringDistraughtRobberyVictim | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:01 | 13 |
| You're right, Game. It was a danged shame that John (Big Bad John)
got the deep thigh bruise thus robbing the Broncs a a shot at these
overrated Redskins. Advantage? Dan Reeves is nowhere near as stupid
as Dr. Marv Levy. When Dr. Marv was running out during the game
intros that sheet-eating "I'm sorry" sheepish grin on his face served
notice to the world that he didn't believe his game plan would work or
his team was anywhere near ready.
Also, a little Comparitive Brain work would also show us that the
club-footed Jim Kelly and his deep centerfield passes woulda NEVER
sprung from the quick-witted hands a John (Big Bad John).
MrT
|
36.904 | | CRLPS::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:04 | 7 |
| � You're right, Game. It was a danged shame that John (Big Bad John)
� got the deep thigh bruise thus robbing the Broncs a a shot at these
� overrated Redskins.
Of course if John had taken advantage of his first half field position,
Kubiak could have QB'ed the entire 2nd half while John signed
autographs and avoided injury on the sideline.
|
36.905 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:06 | 10 |
|
> Also, a little Comparitive Brain work would also show us that the
> club-footed Jim Kelly and his deep centerfield passes woulda NEVER
> sprung from the quick-witted hands a John (Big Bad John).
Naw, Big Bad Jawn woulda stuck with the delayed screen to accomplish
his dirty work...
glenn
|
36.906 | | ROYALT::ASHE | His name is Honest Abe & he's here to say... | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:19 | 2 |
| ...hitting Wilbur Marshall with a 10 yard shovel pass?
|
36.907 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Tue Jan 28 1992 08:59 | 5 |
|
T, you ought to talk to Ms. I. Odegaard abnout this blockage of yours over
BBJ's awful first half performance...
;^)
|
36.908 | doctor-patient confidentiality | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | BoringDistraughtRobberyVictim | Tue Jan 28 1992 10:16 | 4 |
| How do *you* know about Dr. Inga, Childs? That was a private
communique, and a most serious one. Where is that crook anyway.
MrT
|
36.909 | I see her myself from time to time ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Wed Jan 29 1992 10:01 | 2 |
|
she's helping me with my latent fears that all republicans are evil...
|
36.910 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cuimhnich, 13 February 1692 | Wed Jan 29 1992 10:17 | 19 |
| >she's helping me with my latent fears that all republicans are evil...
We're not Mikey. Some of us stand for truth, honor, justice, the true
American way of life, hard work, patriotism, and lots of other cool
things.
It's just that those of us who do are in a position where we don't have
the $$$ to mount a campaign.
Hell, if I thought *I* could do any good, and if *I* had the money, I'd
run. I couldn't do any worse than the bozos now.
Take heart my friend..... and if not, have fun with Inga! 8^)
'Saw
|
36.911 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:57 | 9 |
| Broncos traded Nattiel to Tampa yesterday for Tampa's 6th-round pick
this year plus a conditional pick next year. A good move since Ricky
would've landed (and probably picked up) on the plan B list.
Also heard a rumor which is not good: Michael Young will not be
protected on plan B.
Joe
|
36.912 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:43 | 5 |
| Michael Young has made it clear that he wants to play in DENVER and not
necessarily some other city. It's assumed, I believe, that for that
reason it's safe to have him on plan B.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.913 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:55 | 8 |
| I think Nattiel will work out well for TB. He might end up making
Vinnie look good barring another injury. I don't think the broncos
utilized him well, and they didn't coach him right. JMHO.
I hope Denver gets a good draft pick in the 6th. Any kind of
lineman would help.
Tim
|
36.914 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Thu Jan 30 1992 17:49 | 4 |
| I heard a rumor that Reeves was now going to hire JACK ELWAY as
offensive coordinator. Too much!
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.915 | | QUASER::HUNTER | JaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !! | Thu Jan 30 1992 17:57 | 6 |
| #$%^%^&*&(^&%*( Looks like the Donks are gonna start playing
games. They had better make it clear with Young why he's being
unprotected. Losing him would be a problem. Jack Elway as OC,
aye glenn... You sure you ain't just /~/...
BG
|
36.916 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | We have always been among you! | Thu Jan 30 1992 23:03 | 3 |
| Jack, yer know me better than that!
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.917 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Fri Jan 31 1992 10:59 | 5 |
| Mike Shanahan has been hired by the 49ers as Offensive Coordinator!!
HTH,
Nelly
|
36.918 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans! | Tue Feb 04 1992 13:10 | 3 |
| Re -1, Yechh! How offensive!
|
36.919 | Eitherway out for at least a year.... | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | | Fri Feb 07 1992 13:33 | 6 |
|
Heard today that Denver Bronco QB may be out indefinately...!
Seems that he has injured his sholder beyond repair.......by playing
injured last year......does anyone have anything further to add�
|
36.920 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Fri Feb 07 1992 13:35 | 7 |
| Shouldn't this be in the donks note?
Anyway, I haven't heard that. I have heard that he will probably
have surgery by one of 2 California doctors, but when and rehab, etc..
I have heard nothing....
Tim
|
36.920 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:13 | 6 |
36.921 | oh how the mighty have fallen! | FRETZ::HEISER | tears in heaven | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:22 | 1 |
|
|
36.922 | | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:29 | 7 |
|
not what I heard at all!! Elway out for the entire 92 - 93
season because of permanent damage to his sholder because
he kept playing with an injury. Not only will he be out for
next season but, there is the possibility he may never play
again.... :-( ;o}
|
36.923 | I sure hope this is false.. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | U of W Huskies=fraud chickens! | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:42 | 10 |
|
IF that's true, then that's a big loss for football. Say what you want
about John Elway - but he is a truley gifted athletes - and a hybrid at
quarterback. If his career is over, I personally feel that it is
football - and all football's fans - loss.
I have heard a rumour that the Broncos were interested in signing Dave
Krieg.
JD
|
36.924 | Elway: Bronco's strength or liability? | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | GREAT new Pepsi 'Can' | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:45 | 5 |
|
If true, what a pity.. the end of Superbowl blowouts.. forever!!!
/Jeff
|
36.925 | we talking Mr. Inty here | CNTROL::CHILDS | Rodney Dangerfields>The Dream Team | Fri Feb 07 1992 14:54 | 4 |
|
JD send me some of what you're smokin man....
;^)
|
36.926 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Feb 07 1992 15:11 | 16 |
|
I have no idea where in the hell Hal heard that he's out for a year or
more. Elway is, however, going to have surgery on his shoulder
somewhere in California.
> I have heard a rumour that the Broncos were interested in signing Dave
> Krieg.
I think that's exactly what they should do. Bring in Krieg, who has a
year or two left, until Moore or some other young QB is ready to be an
NFL backup. I haven't heard that Denver has any interest in Krieg yet,
but I did read that they might be interested in trading for Washington
backup Stan Humphries.
Joe
|
36.927 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Fri Feb 07 1992 16:23 | 4 |
| Hal tried Hard(tm) to stir the pot in Donkey land !!!
BG
|
36.928 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:57 | 90 |
| From: ROYALT::ASHE "Walt Ashe DSG1-1/D9 DTN 235-8150 11-Feb-1992 1158" 11-FEB-1992 12:00:04.55
To: @[ASHE.DIS]LOONEY
CC:
Subj: Anyone heard from Big Game, maybe he's in France naming skis..
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (TINA FORDE) writes:
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!tlaeng.enet.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!
usenet.coe.montana.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken!looking!clarinews
From: [email protected] (TINA FORDE)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.olympic,biz.clarinet.sample
Subject: Wax Wars Rage
Keywords: olympics, broadcast
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: 10 Feb 92 20:01:10 GMT
Followup-To: biz.clarinet.sample
Lines: 54
Approved: [email protected]
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.olympic:85 biz.clarinet.sample:3913
ACategory: sports
Slugword: oly-nordic
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 508; Id: z4549; Sel: xxsm.; Adate: 2-10-255pes; Ver: sked
Codes: ysm.rxx., tdza...., tdza...., tbza....
Note: (refiling; changing slug)
COURCHEVEL, France (UPI) -- To American football fans, the names of
Ryan Heckman's skis would sound familiar.
One set of skis is known as Dennis Smith, another is called John
Elway and others carry the names of other members of the Denver Broncos.
``This guy (Heckman) is a huge Broncos' fan,'' said United States
nordic combined coach Tom Steitz. ``So he names all his skis for members
of that team. The others used to name their skis -- one had cartoon
characters -- but it got too confusing. Now, most of them just use
numbers.''
On this particular day, as the nordic combined Olympic team began
practice runs, Heckman chose to use his ``Gaston Green'' skis -- named
for Denver's star running back.
Every member of the nordic combined team has 10 to 15 pairs of skis,
including the light, thin, cross-country skis and the heavy, wide skis
for jumping.
Skis and waxes must be tested constantly against weather and snow
conditions to select the optimum equipment for a competition. The
information is crucial, as a cloud passing below the sun will change the
speed of the course.
``It's a real pain to tell you the truth,'' Steitz said. ``I'll be
glad when it's standardized.''
But it is necessary.
``A fast pair of skis makes the difference between a medal and coming
here to watch,'' Steitz said.
He said he had set up measuring sensors 30 feet apart on a path near
the competition site at Le Praz, a village which is the actual site of
the ski jump and nordic combined competitions. He had measured the air
temperature and the humidity, and stuck a thermometer in the snow to get
a reading.
The designated tester changed from one pair of skis to another,
cruising down the slight slope past Steitz, adding his own comments as
he felt the skis respond. After an hour or so, the coach would have
enough information to go back to his hotel and plug the numbers into a
calculator. The right skis and waxes for the race would emerge.
``We are trying to find the fastest skis for this snow in this
temperature. Then we figure out the fastest wax and match it to the
fastest skis,'' Steitz said.
``We've done this every day for the last three days. It takes a day
or two to pick out what works best here.''
If weather for race day changes radically, they will throw it all out
and start again.
``We'll get up at 3 a.m. and do it,'' Steitz said. ``On race night we
get up every two hours and check the weather. There's no shortcut.''
Nordic countries wouldn't think of burdening coaches and athletes
with such a job.
``Most countries have full time ski technicians, but it's kind of
double duty for Team USA,'' Steitz said. ``Sweden and Norway have four
or five guys who have not even been to the jumps. They do this every
day.''
During World Cup and other events, nordic combined teams will share
knowledge and information. But this is the Olympics.
``Here everybody's keeping pretty secret,'' Steitz said. ``I don't
dare ask what's working.''
HAHA. Gaston Green skis, Elway skis. These guys are destined for a BIG
choke.. 8^)
MikeL thanks to Walt
|
36.929 | Even if Elway was gone, Jim Kelly is still here! | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Tue Feb 11 1992 18:01 | 5 |
| If I named skis, it wouldn't be after men!! Kathy Ireland, Elle
Mcpherson, and other beuties works for me. Besides, the ole figure o
speech "The lady has what it takes" comes to mind eh??
Tim
|
36.930 | | LUNER::BROOKS | You down wit MSG ? | Wed Feb 12 1992 01:13 | 7 |
| The Elway skis probably fall off in sight of the finish line, with the
user 3 seconds behind the leader.
However the user is able to claim that his "Big Bad Skees" would have
gotten him the gold if they had stayed on all the way through ...
Haa.
|
36.931 | Some tidbits | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Thu Feb 13 1992 16:05 | 20 |
| Elway is to have Arthiscopic surgery today in LA. He should recover
in 6-8 weeks if things go well.
Robert Perrymen was arrested fur beatin his woman. She caught him
with other girls phone #'s on his pager....So whats the problem?;)))
Mike Haliburton LB, was in trouble for something else, but it slips
my mind as to what it was....
I didn't know Gerold Perry was back in Denver..These guys must hang out
with him..no punn intended;^
Raymond Berry has been hired as QB coach....The recievers coach has
been promoted to Off Coordinator. Reeves is still the head offensive
guy though!
I'm not sure if Berry will be a + or not...
Tim
|
36.932 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | The 9 hitter | Thu Mar 19 1992 11:27 | 7 |
| RAndy Robbins has signed with the Patriots I believe. Either which
way, I don't think he will be a big loss. He played mostly nickel
back , but did back up Dennis Smith when he played hurt.
Denvers D still can use some better cover guys though...
Tim
|
36.934 | | FRETZ::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Apr 01 1992 12:46 | 1 |
| Good now they can stay out of here!
|
36.935 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Julie's in the Drug Squad | Wed Apr 01 1992 12:50 | 10 |
|
Whoa, there Mikey ! That's not a very neighborly attitude.
Personally, I think the idea of a Denver Broncos notesfiles is pretty
funny. I can't imagine a more depressing place to be the day after the
Donks get the crap beat out of them in yet another Super Bowl provided
they get that far.
BTW - Mike did you used to work at GenRad back in the early eighties ?
I think we may know each other.
|
36.936 | | FRETZ::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Apr 01 1992 12:54 | 4 |
| > BTW - Mike did you used to work at GenRad back in the early eighties ?
> I think we may know each other.
No way Brydie! Is that you?! I guess I better send mail...
|
36.937 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | March madness = ISO 9000 | Wed Apr 01 1992 19:31 | 8 |
| A broncos conference? Na...... Youze guys wouldn't know what to do
with yourselfs during the anual donks vs faids or donks vs spots
games and if we were " out o here". There are usually around 500 new
notes during those weeks and I think for the most part that most people
laugh at all the stupid notes....you wouldn't want to mis that would
ya? ;^)
Tim
|
36.938 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:06 | 7 |
| The Broncos signed Steve Pelluer and Rob Awalt.
I'm surprised Awalt opted for Denver...where the TE has not been a
major focus in the passing game!!
Nelly
|
36.939 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Apr 02 1992 10:55 | 15 |
|
> I'm surprised Awalt opted for Denver...where the TE has not been a
> major focus in the passing game!!
True, but he has pretty much been ignored in Dallas since the arrival of
Novacek. Plus, he may have been anticipating the departure of Kay
through plan B, which didn't happen. Maybe now that Denver has a
proven pass-catching TE they will start to throw to him more.
Denver chose Pelluer over Mark Herrmann.
Joe
|
36.940 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | March madness = ISO 9000 | Sat Apr 04 1992 16:54 | 3 |
| Pellur & Herman are mediocre QBs at best.
Tj
|
36.941 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Apr 07 1992 11:21 | 4 |
| Elway, Pellur & Herman are mediocre QBs at best.
(Is it to early to start this crap yet?)
Carlos
|
36.942 | it may be a longggg year | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:57 | 11 |
| re- is it to early,
Thats funny Carlos, 'cause I was ready to ask the same thing in the
faids file, but decided against it.....
Besides, we know which team has QB problems, and it taint the
donks!
oops, getting me going, you know how!
Tim
|
36.943 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Apr 07 1992 18:52 | 8 |
| Humphrey was scheduled to work out for the Falcons today. One of the
rumors flying around has Bobby going to Atlanta for Mike Pritchard. I
think that would be a great trade for Denver - they'd get a good young
receiver (which they desperately need) who proved in his rookie year
that he can play in this league, plus he'd be a tremendous hometown
favorite.
Joe
|
36.944 | Elbert Crawford | AXIS::CHAPPEL | Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen ! | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:31 | 9 |
| Noticed in todays Globe that ex-Patriot OL Elbert Crawford suffered a
heart attack while working out with the Broncos.
He was signed by Denver as a plan B free agent lasted month.
He is listed in serious condition.
Chap
|
36.945 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:17 | 23 |
| Michael Young will undergo back surgery and be out for 4-6 months.
This isn't bad news, it's very bad news. He has become Denver's most
dependable go-to guy over the past couple of years, and the group of
receivers on this team has gone from one of the league's best a few
years ago to mediocre.
Anyway, I think this will make Denver all-the-more interested in
Pritchard. Consider:
- Young will miss training camp and probably at least the early part of
the regular season.
- The Falcons acquired Drew Hill in Plan B.
- Atlanta waived Rozier yesterday, so they should be more interested in
Humphrey now.
All this is of course in addition to the fact that Denver needed to
beef up their receiving corps to begin with.
OL Elbert Crawford has been taken out of intensive care.
Joe
|
36.946 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Fri Apr 10 1992 16:08 | 4 |
| Did this back problem just creep up? If not, you would think that
he would have been operated on 2-3 months ago.
Tim, who doesn't read the paper much or watch the news to often...
|
36.947 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:48 | 6 |
| Tim,
Young has had problems with his back off and on for a few years and
from what I understand it just got to a point where he felt he needed
surgery.
Joe
|
36.948 | Just for laughs, | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Tue Apr 21 1992 12:09 | 7 |
| Vance Johnson is suing HBO for show him naked "front view" during an
interview after they beat the oilers in the playoffs last year. He
said mama and grandmama was a watching, thus the "embare assment"....
Guess he has to pay for them paternity suits some how;^
Tim
|
36.949 | | CAMONE::WAY | Schmiede, mein Hammer, ein hartes Schwert | Tue Apr 21 1992 12:11 | 8 |
| Why would he be embarassed cause Ma and Grandma were watching.
I'm *SURE* they know what it looks like already, considering one or both
of them probably changed his diapers when he was a little tyke with
a scab on his belly-button!
'Saw
|
36.950 | funny! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Apr 21 1992 12:12 | 6 |
| ESPN ran a piece on this. After reading the story as reported in -.1, the
announcer - forget his name - said that he hoped the suit wasn't dropped
for lack of evidence, whereupon both announcers proceded to crack up and
were almost unable to get through the nexted piece.
TTom
|
36.951 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Tue Apr 21 1992 12:13 | 3 |
| Don't know why, but thats what the news guy said....
Maybe there was something (or wasn't) to be embarassed about;^
|
36.952 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Sit down, Kleine! | Fri Apr 24 1992 13:34 | 30 |
| Denver brought in 8 potential draftees last week for interviews and
workouts. They were:
Tommy Vardell, FB, Stanford
Tommy Maddox, QB, UCLA
Carl Pickens, WR, Tennessee
Troy Auzenne, OT, Cal
John Fina, OT, Arizona
Chris Mims, DT, Tennessee
Robert Porcher, DT, South Carolina St.
Dana Hall, CB, Washington
These would be the most likely candidates for Denver to draft at number
25, but that could all change if they move up by trading Humphrey. I
would say there's better than a 50-50 chance he will be traded on draft
day.
Of the 8 players listed, Denver probably wants Pickens the most but
he's expected to be gone by the time Denver picks. One thing that
surprised me though was that Paul Zimmerman didn't even predict Pickens
to go in the first round.
There's alot of talk of Denver drafting Maddox or another QB as Elway's
eventual replacement in the first or second round. I say it's too
early to draft a successor to Elway - he's gonna be playing another 3
or 4 years.
Joe
|
36.953 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Anybody but the Lakers | Fri Apr 24 1992 13:41 | 5 |
|
I agree Joe, Biff will play 4 maybe even 5 years longer. All depends upon
how long it takes him to be the all time career leader in interceptions...
;^)
|
36.954 | I don't like it....right now, anyway | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:10 | 26 |
| Okay, which makes less sense: Cincinnati drafting David Klingler or Denver
drafting Maddox? This pick just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me,
especially when you consider that Elway is expected to play another 4 or 5
years and Denver had some other areas of immediate need. But the worst part
is that Pickens was still available.
The counterpoint to all this is that I may just love this pick 4 or 5 years
down the road, and I've heard some scouts/coaches/'experts' say that Maddox
would've been a very high pick in another year or two, so maybe Denver will
end up with great QB for the future with a low first-round selection.
Let's just say that the jury will be out on this pick for years, not months.
Meanwhile, don't forget to keep an eye on Pickens the next couple of years
for comparison - I think he will be one great NFL receiver, like all those
other great wideouts from Volunteerland.
Denver's other picks yesterday were:
2nd round - Shane Dronett, DL, Texas
4th round - Chuck Johnson, OG, Texas
5th round - Frank Robinson, CB, Boise State
More on these guys later.
Joe
|
36.955 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:11 | 10 |
| I think Maddox makes perfect sense for the Broncs. They need someone
to come in and replace Elway from time-to-time, yet they need a
potential superstar they can develop for the future. Maddox can ride
the pine, practice and get some WLAF time and then be ready to step in
when Elway decides to retire. Maddox is the type who needs more
experience and probably should have stayed in school for another year
(he had two more years of eligibility) but how can anyone argue with
his decision after becoming a number 1?
John
|
36.956 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:29 | 13 |
| I hope you're right John. One of the knocks on Maddox is that he needs
time, and he'll certainly have plenty of that. Plus, he'll only be 21
in September, so if he started after 3 years of being a backup he'd
still only be 24. And if he does turn out to be as good as people
project, the Broncos can look back at this draft as a great one.
But this isn't a team that should be looking to the future. With 2 AFC
title game appearances in the past 3 seasons and Elway on the downside
of his career, the future is now for Denver.
If anyone's gonna spell Elway this year, it'll be Pelluer.
Joe
|
36.957 | Reeves Philosophy for the 92/93 season. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Free Ivan the terrible | Mon Apr 27 1992 12:40 | 4 |
| Run the Baw
Run the Baw
Run fer your life Jown
Punt
|
36.958 | Reeves is following uncle Al's lead... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Apr 27 1992 13:11 | 10 |
| I think gambling on an inexperienced QB with a first round pick that
could have been used on impact player that is ready to play now was a
mistake. Of course lasted year, when the Raiders took a gamble in the
first round on a soph. QB, I liked it, but then again, the Doinks are
hardly the Raiders, and besides the Raiders needed a QB the Doinks
don't. I think they would have been better off going after bigger
needs.
Carlos
|
36.959 | Time will tell, as always! | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Mon Apr 27 1992 17:35 | 11 |
| I'm undecided. The broncos needed OL or CB help. They got them in
the 4th & 5th round, but probably could have used a higher round pick
to get "potentially" better players.
I saw this Maddox guy almost beat USC 2 years ago if I remember
right. I think it was a game Maranovich won.
Whats his physical stats?
Tim
|
36.960 | ex | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Apr 27 1992 17:58 | 5 |
| >>What's his physical stats?
6-4, 195 lbs.
Carlos
|
36.961 | | DECWET::METZGER | We'll always have Paris. | Mon Apr 27 1992 18:29 | 22 |
|
Personally I'm bummed that Denver picked Maddox. Why? because I hate denver and
Maddox will take them where Mr. Ed never could. To a super bowl championship
within 5-7 years. Denver drafted one smart Qb in Maddox. He'll read defenses
better this year than elway ever could. He's already got a better touch on the
ball than john-boy.
However it is up to Reeves to modify the game plan around Maddox in 3 years and
implement a couple of things (like screen passes and a quicker passing game
that relies on brains instead of scrambling ability).
I wish Detroit had gotten Maddox because in 2 years he wouldda been the starting
QB and Detroit would have been in the big game. Plus it would have been great
to see whose QB would win the battle (Doc's andre (the flop) Ware or my choice
Maddox)...
Still Bummed.....
Metz
|
36.962 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Mon Apr 27 1992 18:50 | 1 |
| Thx Carlos!
|
36.963 | It's obvious to everyone ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Prince > Madonna | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:36 | 9 |
| Metz, why do you beat some issues in the ground ? You ragged on me
about Peete - or at least tried to, until Peete showed that he was a
majorleague QB. You tried to crtiozie me because I said that Major
Harris should have been **drafted** (never said he could/would star).
And once, you even tried to link me supporting Tony Rice, when I always
said he'd be a stiff.
You need to do something about this fixation you have dude ...
|
36.964 | | DECWET::METZGER | We'll always have Paris. | Tue Apr 28 1992 16:44 | 20 |
|
A little touchy aren't we Dock?
I rag on your QB picks because they are so often wrong. I never said a thing
about Peete except that he'll never put together a complete NFL season. I got
on your case about Harris and Ware because you implied that there were racial
reasons why their stock in the NFL draft dropped when history has shown that
this simply isn't the case. As far as I know I've never tied your name in with
Rice either. I do remember getting on your case when you got upset that it
was mentioned that teams might draft Rice and turn him into a defensive back
and your shackles got up stating that (again) it was racially motivated.
Your evaluation of QB talent is usually so far off it's an easy target Dock.
Talk to me when Ware gets off the bench,
Metz
|
36.965 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Twentyfive or 6 to 4 ... | Tue Apr 28 1992 17:50 | 14 |
| 1) Ware went high in the first round. Stock didn't drop that far eh ?
2) I didn't like Peete dropping ... and since Peete has performed well,
you've jumped on the Ware bash-wagon.
3) I never said squat about Rice, except that he wasn't an NFL QB.
But you don't let facts stop a good polemic.
4) Major doesn't have what it takes. So what.
5) You know as much about history as Elway does about winning a Super
Bowl ... :-)
Try again ...
|
36.966 | Which QB is Dock's next annointed one? | DECWET::METZGER | We'll always have Paris. | Tue Apr 28 1992 18:24 | 13 |
|
And are you still predicting great things for Ware?
give me Eric Kramer over Peete or Ware anyday. You'll see both of them
riding the pine this season. Or Peete will start two games until he suffers
yet another injury....
Talk to me when you can evaluate talent without racial bias Dock.
On second thought...don't bother....
Metz
|
36.968 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Apr 29 1992 13:26 | 96 |
| Overview of Bronco draft picks:
1st round - Tommy Maddox, QB, UCLA (6-4, 195)
3rd year sophomore...completed 182 of 327 for 2682 yards, 17 TD's and 14
interceptions in 1990 and completed 192 of 315 for 2505 yards, 16 TD's and
15 interceptions in 1991...talented natural athlete but has a side-arm
delivery which caused alot of his passes to be batted down at the line of
scrimmage...throws a good touch pass and has a good ability to sense and
elude the pass rush...quick release...has innate feel for the passing game and
picks up secondary receivers well...viewed as a developmental, long-range
prospect...Mel Kiper says: "At this stage of the game he isn't anywhere close
to being a finished product, so he has to be considered a major gamble if
selected in the first 2-3 rounds of the draft.
2nd round - Shane Dronett, DE, Texas (6-5, 270)
Coming out as a true junior...had 44 solo tackles last season with 9 sacks and
8 stops behind the line fo scrimmage. Caused 4 fumbles and blocked 4 kicks.
Blocked 7 kicks in his career at Texas...go for the gusto type of football
player, displaying a great deal of enthusiam...active, aggressive, physical
player who excels in shutting down an opponent's outside running game and is
an effective pass rusher...recruited as a tight end out of high school.
4th round - Chuck Johnson, OG, Texas (6-3, 280)
Versatile drive blocker who plays hard and has potential as a pass blocker
because of his quick feet and good balance...Started at left tackle in 1990
but was in and out of the lineup last season because of a hyperextended knee
and ankle injury, starting only 4 games...Also missed some playing time as
a junior with a sprained knee...scouts like his willingness to work and his
intelligence...has already been accepted into law school...Kiper: "...the
only factor that could prevent him from reaching his full potential is a lack
of durability. If he can stay away from the nicks, you could be looking at
a top flight guard in the NFL."
5th round - Frank Robinson, CB, Boise State (5-10, 174)
3-year starter after walking on...intercepted 6 passes as a junior...finished
the 1991 season with 31 tackles, 8 ints. (4 while playing with a broken hand),
11 pass breakups, and 2 fumble recoveries. 2 of those picks were returned for
TD's...blocked 7 kicks as a junior and returned 19 punts for a 10.1 average
last season...doesn't have good speed, but has been able to get by with his
tremendous feel for the position...plays the ball in coverage as well as the
highly regarded CB's...coming from Boise State, will remain a Bronco. :^)
7th round - Ron Geater, DL, Iowa (6-5, 272)
Wasn't even considered a draftable prospect at the beginning of the 1991
season, limited solely to duty as a reserve until this season...started first
10 games in '91, recording 84 tackles, 15 takcles for losses and 9 sacks...
has good height, quickness, hustle and activity...made an inordinate number
of tackles for a defensive tackle...came a long way this year, making you
wonder how he would be regarded if he could have started an additional year
or two.
7th round - Jim Johnson, OT, Michigan State (6-5, 300)
Strong, mobile pass protector with quick feet and an aggressive nature...moved
into the starting lineup at right tackle in 1990 and started all year in 1991
...showed his toughness this past season when he played despite operating at
far less than 100% with a stress fracture in his left foot...quick DE's were
able to beat him to the corner, and he also had trouble with any finesse-type
moves by the defender...Will handle straight-ahead bull rushers, since very
few DL can outslug this guy in the trenches.
7th round - Jon Bostick, WR, Nebraska (6-1, 190)
Big-play, possession-type receiver with outstanding leaping ability...averaged
24.1 yards on 12 catches in '89, 6 for TD's...caught 19 passes for 375 yards
and 4 TD's as a junior and 24 for 419 yards and 5 TD's as a senior...a solid
blocker who can handle return duties...averaged 14.3 yards on 7 punt returns
in 1990.
8th round - Dietrich Lockridge, OG, Jackson State (6-3, 320)
4-year starter at left guard...has some quickness and shows flashes of
dominance...has the wide body many teams are looking for...Uses his massive
frame to move defenders with an initial explosion, and holds his own on pass
protection...his weight could be a problem, ballooning up to 330 at times.
9th round - Muhammad Oliver, CB, Oregon (5-10, 170)
Outstanding athlete and terrific jumper who impressed scouts with his
improvement last season...Missed 5 games because of a knee injury in 1990 but
was a starter in 1991, when he had 53 tackles and 3 interceptions and
returned 15 kickoffs for an 18.1 yard average.
10th round - Bob Meeks, C, Auburn (6-1, 286)
Can play any position on the offensive line...Started at center in every game
the past 2 seasons...hard worker on the field and in the weight room...strong
and tough enough to take on straight-ahead bull rushers, but a super quick
penetrator can get him off balance just enough to blast through on either side.
11th round - Cedric Tillman, WR, Alcorn State (6-2, 205)
Caught 58 passes for 790 yards and 11 TD's last season...will make the
acrobatic catch and is not afraid to dive or catch the ball in a crowd...doesn't
have great speed.
12th round - John Granby, S, Virginia Tech (6-1, 200)
Physical, strong player who has good size and awareness..has been a starter
5 seasons at Virginia Tech, but broke his jaw in the 1990 opener and was
granted a medical hardship...came back in 1991 to record 31 solo tackles and
intercept 4 passes.
|
36.969 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Wed Apr 29 1992 14:00 | 14 |
| My view:
Maddox - Jury out for "some" years.
Dronett & Robinson - Kick blockers!!!!!!! Something Denver hasn't
had since Louis Wright days!
Jim Johnson - Sounds like great potential! Maybe move to left tackle
since that denvers main offensive line weekness.
The rest, we will see! I'm sure 1/2 of them will be busts-(
Tim
|
36.970 | | USCTR2::NAHEARN | | Wed Apr 29 1992 14:24 | 5 |
| What's the latest on Bobby Humphrey? Will the Broncos go to training
camp with him, or continue to look for a taker?
Nelly
|
36.971 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:37 | 7 |
| Once again the Bronco "Brain Trust" has pulled another boner in
the draft. I can't imagin what the heck could have been goint through
their respective one brain cell that would have triggered them to
pick Maddox. Maybe Gawd (Elway) has told them he's gonna hang `em up
soon. It's the only logic I can see to it.
Big Game (an upset Donks fan... but what new)
|
36.972 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | electric warrior, acoustic saint | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:39 | 1 |
| Shame, just when they finally got their own Notes conference too!
|
36.973 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:44 | 4 |
| The Donks have their own notes file.... WHERE, WHERE !!
Someone tell me WHERE !!
BG
|
36.974 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | That's when I reach for my revolver | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:47 | 9 |
| Big Game,
It's SUPERBOWLASSWHIPPING::BRONCOS.
Hope this helps,
_Tommy
|
36.975 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:52 | 3 |
| Thats pretty good, Tommy...
Big Game (whos rolling)
|
36.976 | | CAMONE::WAY | At 6', 245, from Parts Unknown | Wed Apr 29 1992 16:53 | 4 |
| > It's SUPERBOWLASSWHIPPING::BRONCOS.
Must be one of those new Phase V node names....
|
36.977 | Impressions from Bronco's QB coach | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Free Ivan the terrible | Wed Apr 29 1992 18:59 | 8 |
| Ray Berry "yes fomer Patriot coach" stated that Tommy Maddox has a style
likened to "JOE WILLIE NAMATH".
Proof that Reeves lost his only colloe loving live brain cell and hired a guy
that made a girl out of Tony Eason.
Jeff
|
36.978 | 1992 Bronco Schedule | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu May 07 1992 12:26 | 31 |
| PRESEASON
Aug. 3 at San Francisco 6 pm
Aug. 8 TAMPA 4 pm
Aug. 15 Miami (at Berlin) 11 am
Aug. 22 at Dallas 6 pm
Aug. 28 PHOENIX 7 pm
REGULAR SEASON
Sept. 6 LA RAIDERS 6 pm (Sunday night, TNT)
Sept. 13 SAN DIEGO 2 pm
Sept. 20 at Philadelphia 11 am
Sept. 27 at Cleveland 11 am
Oct. 4 KANSAS CITY 2 pm
Oct. 12 at Washington 7 pm (Monday night)
Oct. 18 HOUSTON 2 pm
Oct. 25 at San Diego 2 pm
Nov. 1 Bye
Nov. 8 NY JETS 2 pm
Nov. 15 NY GIANTS 6 pm (Sunday night, ESPN)
Nov. 22 at LA Raiders 2 pm
Nov. 30 at Seattle 7 pm (Monday night)
Dec. 6 DALLAS 2 pm
Dec. 12 at Buffalo 10:30 am (Saturday)
Dec. 20 SEATTLE 2 pm
Dec. 27 at Kansas City 11 am
All times are Mountain
|
36.979 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Thu May 07 1992 18:25 | 3 |
| Could turn into a tough schedule! Opening day is a must to go too.
Tim
|
36.980 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed May 13 1992 10:21 | 7 |
| Hey Tim, how tough would it be to get some tickets for opening day in
Broncsville? I think I might've asked about that a few years ago and
you guy's said it was near impossible to get tickets for a
Raider/Broncs game, is that still the situation? It would be kinda neat
to go up and watch the Raiders slap the Doinks around a few times :-)
Carlos
|
36.981 | and its not even camp time | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Wed May 13 1992 10:41 | 14 |
| Come on Carlos, the faids haven't slapped around the donks since
1974. All games are usually within 5 points no matter who wins.
As to ticket availability, I'm not sure. The faids/donks games are
usually tough to get unless you are only looking for 1-2 tix. Show up
1-2 hours before game time. Scalpers will be out making a buck.
If you plan on going, be sure to get seats in the south stands. They
love faider fans;^ Be sure to wear your silver and black.
Its a long drive back to N.M after your team loses!
Tim
|
36.982 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Wed May 13 1992 13:58 | 6 |
| Any news from the Bobby Humphrey front? Will he be on the Broncos'
roster on September 6th? If he is still with the team, does he have
any chance of re-capturing his starting job?
Nelly
|
36.983 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | HangMan | Wed May 13 1992 16:57 | 18 |
| No news on a trade.
My opinion is Reeves will keep him around, and eventually take the
starting job back if he isn't the starter come week 1. He will work
hard to recover what was lost last year.
Bobby is better than Green IMO. Green had a good year for being
behind a mediocre line, but he falls when touched. Bobby is more of a
"power" runner, which is what Denver will need, especially with the
schedule they have this year.
Trading Bobby would be a mistake, 'cause Green may get hurt, and
the other backup (his name slips me) is ok, but thats it.
Heres to having Bobby back in as starter!
Tim
|
36.984 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu May 21 1992 13:35 | 13 |
| Well, fire up the Humphrey trade talk again. Latest rumor has Bobby
going to Miami for Sammie Smith and other considerations, probably a
2nd or 3rd-round draft pick.
Actually, it's being reported as an all-but-done deal, the only problem
being where to find Bobby. Nobody has been able to get in touch with
him, not even his agent.
If the trade does indeed happen, I'm won't be overly thrilled by it,
mainly because of Smith's fumbling habit.
Joe
|
36.985 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Thu May 21 1992 13:38 | 5 |
| I read where the Donkeys were hesitant to trade Humphrey until
they got Green signed 'cuz having Bobby around gives them more leverage
in the contract negotiations.
/Don
|
36.986 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Thu May 21 1992 14:12 | 8 |
| Trading Humphrey for Smith? What in the ____ do the think their
doing? Smith is a fumbler and is not worth the trade, especially a
2nd or 3rd round extra! 1st round is a maybe (big) at that.
Smith does good 'cause he has a good offensive line to run behind. I
think he wouldn't do as good behind Denver's mediocre line.
Tim
|
36.987 | Fire the lot of `em Managment that is | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Thu May 21 1992 16:06 | 4 |
| Once again the Bronco Brain Trust puts forth a great idea.
It's Gonna be a long, long year for us Donks fans...
BG
|
36.988 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Fri May 22 1992 03:18 | 7 |
| Heard on the local news that the Denver Post stated that Humphrey is
indeed headed for fishland. According to channel 9 (Zapolo) that
Humphrey and his agent have been contacted. Only thing needing done is
the inking so Reeves said. Of course he said nothing is definate (just
like always).
Tim
|
36.989 | | GENRAL::WADE | fill yer hands you <CENSORED>!! | Fri May 22 1992 09:30 | 5 |
|
Stupid trade. They should have tried to trade for
a good left tackle............
Claybone
|
36.990 | The rumors continue... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri May 22 1992 12:34 | 17 |
|
> Stupid trade. They should have tried to trade for
> a good left tackle............
Speculation in Miami is that Jeff Dellenbach could end up being part of the
Humphrey deal. Who is Dellenbach, you ask? Well, he was Miami's starter at
left tackle before the young All-Pro Richmond Webb came along.
Of course, both teams are declining comment on the trade, and Reeves said that
"no deal is imminent."
I think they could use a good back like Smith because Green's durability
remains a big question. However, I like the tough running of Greg Lewis and
if Smith comes in how much playing time would Lewis see?
Joe
|
36.991 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NobodyDoesBlewLikeDockers� | Fri May 22 1992 12:39 | 4 |
| They reported this trade as a done deal on NESN this morning.
Guess I can't believe Amy Stone anymore.
/Don
|
36.992 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Tue May 26 1992 10:59 | 6 |
| So did this trade happen over the weekend? I wasn't near a TV for 3
days, and loving it (kids wear out VCR).
Tim
|
36.993 | Nope | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue May 26 1992 11:50 | 1 |
|
|
36.994 | Swapping one headcase for another? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 10:45 | 42 |
| From: [email protected]
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc
ARTICLE:
Date: 26 May 92 20:33:08 GMT
MIAMI (UPI) -- The Miami Dolphins traded fumble-prone running back
Sammie Smith to Denver Tuesday for Bobby Humphrey, the Broncos'
disgruntled ball carrier.
The Broncos have been trying to trade Humphrey, 25, since last
October when he returned from a 96-day holdout while under contract.
After rushing for 2,386 yards his first two seasons, Humphrey carried
only 11 times for 33 yards last year while watching Gaston Green become
Denver's top rusher with 1,037 yards.
Smith, 25, was Miami's top draft pick out of Florida State in 1989,
but lost his starting job to Mark Higgs last season after goal-line
fumbles at crucial moments in losses to Houston and Kansas City. He also
missed much of the season with a knee injury.
After the fumbles, Dolphin fans began an obscene chant about Smith
that reverberated through Joe Robbie Stadium.
The Dolphins' interest in Humphrey was made public about a week
before this year's draft, but they seemed to back off when Humphrey
missed two appointments for physical examinations. He eventually took
one in mid-April.
The Broncos had hoped to get a first-round pick for Huymphrey, but
there were no takers. Humphrey was a first-round supplemental draft
choice from Alabama in 1989.
The Atlanta Falcons had been considered a serious bidder, but that
deal fell through.
The Dolphins revived their efforts last week when Charley Winner,
director of player personnel, called Denver Coach Dan Reeves for
permission to talk to Humphrey's agent.
Humphrey is scheduled to make $450,000 this season but wants more.
Smith is in the final year of his contract, which pays $440,000. Both
had been quoted as saying they would welcome a trade.
Smith, 6-foot-2 and 230 pounds, rushed for only 297 yards in 1991
because of his knee problems last year. His best year was in 1990 when
he gained 831 yards and finished the season strong. His rookie year in
1989 was hampered by injuries and a long holdout.
Humphrey, 6-1 and 201 pounds, gained 1,202 yards in 1990 and 1,151
yards as a rookie in 1989.
|
36.995 | | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Carson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff' | Wed May 27 1992 10:59 | 5 |
|
Great news! Now Denver can experience "the fumble" at every game
without NBC drugging up the past ;-)
/Jeff
|
36.996 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 27 1992 11:04 | 4 |
| � without NBC drugging up the past ;-)
What does NBC use to drug up the past? Halluegeons? Qualudes?
'Shrooms? ;^)
|
36.997 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 11:17 | 16 |
| Great, if Denver fans approach this as the Broncos get a fumble-prone
guy, Sammie won't ever reach his full potential. I thought Miami fans
showed no class at all towards Smith. Playing with that thought in his
head certainly affected his game.
He fumbled on 2 momentous occasions. So has Dickerson. Did that deserve
the vicious treatment Smith received?
I would think that Bronco fans, known for their strong support of their
team, right or wrong, would get behind Sammie and cheer him on.
Humphrey didn't want to be there...Smith is looking forward to playing
there. I would think the Orange Masses would embrace the guy and
encourage him to succeed.
Rich
|
36.998 | Right back at square 1 | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed May 27 1992 12:18 | 15 |
| Denver didn't get what they could've for Bobby, but the thing that
bothers me most about this trade is they got a player at a position
where they didn't have a need. With Smith the probably backup and
relief back to Green, that pretty much leaves Lewis on the bench. Not
to mention Sewell.
Getting someone's 2nd-round draft pick for Humphrey back on draft day
would've been a much better deal IMO.
As for Smith's well-publicized fumbling problem, that's all everyone is
talking about and the first time he puts the ball on the ground next
fall you can be assured the grumblings will begin.
Joe
|
36.999 | I glad Houston won the game, but I felt sorry for Smith | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm too sexy for this note ... | Wed May 27 1992 12:50 | 9 |
| I think it was a good deal for both teams. Smith is a good back who
took his problem pretty hard. You have to believe between the classless
booing of the Dolphin fans, and his own memory, smith got gunshy. A
change of enviroment is the best thing for him. And I think he is a
better runner than Humphries.
I hope he has a big year.
Doc
|
36.1000 | 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Wed May 27 1992 13:04 | 9 |
| -1,
Re. classless booing of the Dolphin fans.
Remove booing, the and Dolphin and replace with Miami.
Then you cover the whole enchilada
HTH,
MikeL
|
36.1001 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | "I'll get briefed up on that" hahahaaa | Wed May 27 1992 13:12 | 7 |
|
Joe, I wouldn't be that sold on Green after just
one good year. A year that he also couldn't remain
healthy in.
mike
|
36.1002 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed May 27 1992 13:46 | 11 |
| I totally agree that Green's ability to stay healthy is a big question
mark, but I liked what I saw of Lewis last year. However, with Smith
coming in, it's doubtful he'll get a chance to show what he can do as a
feature back.
As for Smith, I've always felt that a change of scenery is the best
thing that can happen to a disguntled player, but it's just that Denver
doesn't need another running back IMO.
Joe
|
36.1003 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Wed May 27 1992 14:15 | 6 |
| This was a straight up trade? What kinda kocka is that? Miami made
out!! Humphrey will have a great year running behind that OL Miami
has! As to Smith? Reeves will probably find a way to screw this up.
Actually it sounds like he already did!!!
Tim
|
36.1004 | Just in | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Wed May 27 1992 14:18 | 6 |
| Denver is also close to signing a senior citizen Stanley Morgan ???
Stupid stupid Stupid...
|
36.1005 | Class = Stanley Morgan | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Wed May 27 1992 14:34 | 8 |
| Stanley Morgan has more knowledge about receiving a football than the
entire Bronco offensive coaching staff. If you folks out there are
lucky enough to aquire the Steamer, the positive aspect of his presence
will rub off on your younger receivers and his leadership and class
will impress each and every one of you.
Rich
|
36.1006 | $ .02 | TULA::CGRIEGO | | Wed May 27 1992 15:32 | 14 |
| Re .1003 >>Miami made out!!
My thoughts exactly Tim, the doink's management again prove their
ineptitude. The Broncs definitely got the short end of the stick on
that trade. Watch for Miami to win the East this year, and maybe even
make it to the show. [by the way, I don't think that *just* the
Humphrey trade is their ticket to the show (although it's a big help),
they also did well in the draftraft, they added Mean Joe to the
defensive coaching staff, and they addressed some needs via plan b.
I give them an 'A' for there off season work. On the other hand, watch
the doinks' running game to be nuthin special, to match the rest of the
team.
Carlos
|
36.1007 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed May 27 1992 16:06 | 9 |
| And just to witness that Miami made out like a bandit in this deal,
they had a sportscaster from Miami on KOA's show last night and he
hadn't talked to anyone who wasn't thrilled with the deal the Dolphins
got.
Also, Reeves even said this wasn't the deal Denver wanted.
Joe
|
36.1008 | I'll up that .02 | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Playoff bound | Wed May 27 1992 18:26 | 12 |
| If Reeves didn't want that deal, then why the h___ did he do it?
Thats a frustration type of question.
As to Stanley Morgan, if he is so great Rich, then why did the Pats
and Jets? let him go? Isn't he like 100 years old? He may help in
coaching, but not as a player!
Heck the donks could do better with a faider WR, which ain't saying
much!
Tim
|
36.1009 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | "I'll get briefed up on that" hahahaaa | Thu May 28 1992 09:49 | 9 |
|
He did cause he wasn't going to get jackshooty out of Bobby with Smith he has
a chance to get some productivity...
Morgan is simple the end result of a youth movement by the Pats and Jets. He's
certainly more talent than anything the Donks have now. He always been able to
catch the homerun something none of them are capable of. Nattiel was supposed
to be but DannyBoy's got Nattiel's brains fried....
|
36.1010 | | DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKE | | Thu May 28 1992 10:33 | 10 |
| Tim,
Morgan was making big bucks. Vic was a dullard. Jets going for youth
movement. BTW - why did Iggles give up on Harold Jackson. New England
felt he was an antique. He then gave 2-3 very solid, productive years.
BTW - I think Morgan played for the Colts lasted year, not the Jets.
Rich
|
36.1011 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu May 28 1992 10:53 | 9 |
| Morgan played for us through the 1989, was with the Colts for at least
1990 and I believe was out of football in 1991.
It's a strange pickup for the Broncos. Morgan's big asset was always
his speed and he's lost a lot of that, and he was never really known
for his courage in going over the middle. I honestly don't know how
much he's going to help the Broncos.
John
|
36.1012 | They haven't even signed him yet... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu May 28 1992 11:03 | 7 |
| I don't think it's a strange pickup at all. Denver needs help at WR,
and if they can get a decent year out of Morgan that'd be great. Kind
of like the Butch Johnson situation. But to say that Morgan is better
than anyone Denver has right is ridiculous...of course, what else did
ya expect from Childs. :^)
Joe
|
36.1013 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu May 28 1992 11:57 | 11 |
| >>Heck the donks could do better with a faider WR, which ain't saying
>>much!
C'mon Tim, you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't give your right
...ahem... leg to have Tim Brown, or Swervin Mervyn, on the receiving
end of Mr. Ed's passes, can you??? (I think Gault is over-rated.)
Carlos
|
36.1014 | the deal | MCIS2::CLAYBROOK | | Thu May 28 1992 12:05 | 3 |
| As a Pats fan, I wish Denver and the Dolphins didn't make the trade.
Dan
|
36.1015 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu May 28 1992 13:16 | 9 |
|
> C'mon Tim, you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't give your right
> ...ahem... leg to have Tim Brown
Denver doesn't want an undeserving Heisman winner.
Joe
|
36.1016 | Can't resist can ya Joe? 8^) Tsk Tsk | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Thu May 28 1992 13:36 | 1 |
|
|
36.1017 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Thu May 28 1992 14:02 | 8 |
| As the owner of Bobby Humphrey's rights in the Ultimate Football
League, I am very happy with the trade!! With the Dolphins young and
talented Offensive line and the need for opposing defenses to
concentrate on Marino, Humphrey could post some impressive numbers!!
I wonder if Miami will get him involved in the passing game?
Nelly
|
36.1018 | Watch for Elway to have good year | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Advanced past 1st round of 'offs! | Thu May 28 1992 14:15 | 18 |
| Fernandez would be it. Brown is overrated! He used to be a great
kick returner, but that it IMO.
I have always liked Vance Johnson as a player. He will go over the
middle. Actually that is usually where he is more productive IMO.
Mark Jackson does his on and off routine that he is average at best.
Micheal Young is almost a Steve Largent/Steve Watson clone (reliable).
To bad he is hurtin'.
Nattiel (when he was here) was way under utilized. He had the speed
and hands, but could'nt run a good route (except fly) to save the
teams life.
The other WR that was a rookie last year (forgot his name) has
potential, but needs to learn how to catch some of those "catchable"
balls.
Tim
|
36.1019 | Elway = Strong Arm, Big Teefes, Avg. Stats, No Rings | LUNER::BROOKS | I'm too sexy for this note ... | Thu May 28 1992 14:43 | 6 |
| re -.1
We've been watching for Elway to have a real All-Pro year for what,
five years ?
still haven't seen it ....
|
36.1020 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Thu May 28 1992 16:11 | 16 |
| I think people have forgotten that Tim Brown had a serious knee injury
early in his Raider career. Late last season he began to look like a
player more confident in his skills and less preoccupied with how his
knee was holding up. In fact, it appeared that he and Marinovich had a
chemistry going for them....one that may translate into big numbers for
Brown if Todd gets the call from Day 1 of the '92 season. Brown is an
outstanding athlete and competitor.....and more than just a kick
returner (IMHO)!! I can see Fernandez being the Raiders deep threat
and Brown being a possession receiver who can get deep and break
tackles after the catch!!
He would be a valuable addition to the Broncos receiving corps (threw
that in to get back to the note's topic!!!)!!!
Nelly
|
36.1021 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu May 28 1992 16:18 | 14 |
| re .1018:
Rookie WR = Shannon Sharpe?
re .1017:
According to a sportscast I saw the day after the trade, yes the
Dolphins do plan to use Humphrey as a pass receiver more...Shula said
that was one of the things he likes about Humphrey.
py
|
36.1022 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Advanced past 1st round of 'offs! | Thu May 28 1992 17:59 | 2 |
| Derek Russell is the rookies name. I remember!
Tim
|
36.1023 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu May 28 1992 18:06 | 8 |
|
> Rookie WR = Shannon Sharpe?
The receiver Tim's referring to is Derek Russell, last year's 4th round
pick. Sharpe is used predominantly as an H-back or tight end anymore.
Joe
|
36.1024 | Just my $.02 | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Thu May 28 1992 19:11 | 11 |
|
I don't think it much matters who the Donks pick up at WR since
there ain't gonna be no balls coming their way. Remember, the
Donks Brain Truss picked a QB instead of some offensive line help.
With that fantanstic move Elway, his back up, and his back ups back
up will be spending most of their time a$$ and surely won't have any time
to be looking down field for Vance, Mark, Shannon, Young or anyother WR
for that matter. The Donks blew the draft BIG !!! Donk Fans, Look
forward to a long, disappointing, and injury filled year.
Big Game
|
36.1025 | Time will tell | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Advanced past 1st round of 'offs! | Fri May 29 1992 09:18 | 7 |
| I never thought I would hear Cacti giving up on the season before
training camp has even started.
you may be right Jack, but then again, if Elway stays healthy, I
think he will do good.
Tim
|
36.1026 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Thu Jun 11 1992 15:16 | 3 |
| Ex-Patriot Stanley Morgan, 37, has signed with the Donks. And he's
not even a ex-Cowboy!
Denny
|
36.1027 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Bounced out in 2nd round (sigh) | Thu Jun 11 1992 18:14 | 1 |
| He is still old
|
36.1028 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jun 12 1992 10:42 | 1 |
| ...and still fast.
|
36.1029 | 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Fri Jun 12 1992 10:59 | 5 |
| Yabbut,
Who'll git the ball to him??
MikeL
|
36.1030 | Ah, shaddup Leary! :^) | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:03 | 1 |
|
|
36.1031 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Jun 16 1992 18:38 | 4 |
| Great, now the doinks have a senior citizen WR to go along wif there
senior citizen QB. I bet the rest of the league is shaking...
Carlos
|
36.1032 | Another Orange Crush LB added | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Tue Jul 07 1992 16:42 | 10 |
| Tom Jackson will be added to Mile High's Ring of Fame this year.
Cerimonies to happen during the home game against KC.
Tom was always one of the most charged up players I have ever
witnessed. He did alot for Denver during his career.
Congrats,
Tim
|
36.1033 | TRAINING CAMP IS OPEN ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Mon Jul 20 1992 15:29 | 13 |
| Well the AFC west division champion DENVER Bronco's opened camp yesterday with
only 9 holdouts.
5 veterans Simon Fletcher, Ron Holmes, Jeff Davidson...
4 Rookies Tommy MAddox....
John Elway strained a hamstring during windsprints his future with the team is
questionable.
NOT
|
36.1034 | Mr Ed injured! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jul 20 1992 15:39 | 2 |
| I thought they shot lame horses!
Denny
|
36.1035 | Don't let the door hit ya on the way out, Summer! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jul 20 1992 19:36 | 13 |
|
> 5 veterans Simon Fletcher, Ron Holmes, Jeff Davidson...
Fletcher and Green are the most notable holdouts and they are also
expected to be the toughest guys to get signed.
> 4 Rookies Tommy MAddox....
Maddox is the only unsigned rookie but he is expected to be signed in
the next couple of days.
Joe
|
36.1036 | Waiting for Big Game to spew forth 8^) | CTHQ4::LEARY | Chainsaw: Possible ND convert? | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:19 | 9 |
| Boy is this a oxymoron or what,
Any OBJECTIVE Broncos supporter out there who cain give the Denver
media's opinion of Maddox? Cain he take the Donks to places Mr Ed
never took 'em before?
|
36.1037 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | MARLINS, AND SHARKS FEAST | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:47 | 5 |
|
He wont take them any further than the normal plane trip :)
dinz
|
36.1038 | NOTwithstanding the NOT | NROPST::MPO12::MCFALL | This is the end of the innocence | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:56 | 6 |
| >John Elway strained a hamstring during windsprints his future with the team is
>questionable.
Folks in these parts have thought him questionable for years :^)
Jim M
|
36.1039 | :-) | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Jul 22 1992 15:16 | 7 |
| Re. last few, I've noticed over the last couple of years that Mr. Ed
has been sustaining more and more of these little nagging type
injuries, and they're taking longer and longer to heal. This added to
the donks terrible offensive line (one of the worst in the AFC) equals
a not so distant one way trip to the glue factory for bucky. HtH.
Carlos
|
36.1040 | updates | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Jul 27 1992 13:29 | 5 |
| Does anyone have an injury report from camp? I heard that Sewell got
hurt and is history for the year...
Tim, who's been on vacation for 2 1/2 weeks......
|
36.1041 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jul 27 1992 14:32 | 21 |
| Guess we are overdue for some updates here...
Yea, Sewell broke an ankle in a scrimmage Saturday and will be out for
about 3 months. Mr. 3rd down will be sorely missed.
Gaston Green signed yesterday, leavin six unsigned players, all
veterans.
Greg Lewis has had a good first week of camp...Sammie Smith hasn't seen
much action because of a groin pull.
Elway's shoulder is feeling fine after offseason surgery...Pelluer has
dropped 3 snaps in scrimmages...Shawn Moore has looked pretty good, but
it really doesn't matter since he won't be around.
Croel is even quicker than he was last year.
First preseason game is a week from tonight at SF.
Joe
|
36.1042 | Thanks Joe! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Jul 27 1992 16:17 | 1 |
| Dump Pelluer and keep Moore.....
|
36.1043 | Droppin like flies | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Tue Jul 28 1992 16:04 | 12 |
| Sewell is now out for the year. He will be missed!
The Vance tore up a shoulder and is to have an MRI done. Recieving
corps are in deep stink. 3-4 years ago, DEnver had some of the best,
but with all the injuries and trades, that has now changed.
Stanley Morgan may now be a started at this rate. Who is left?
Derek Russell and Mark Jackson. Young is out for awhile if I
remember correctly....
Tim
|
36.1044 | Donks = -.500 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:58 | 13 |
| >>Stanley Morgan may now be a started at this rate. Who is left?
>>Derek Russell and Mark Jackson. Young is out for awhile if I
>>remember correctly....
Hey Tim, I think your right about Young...didn't he have back surgery
in the off season or somthing like that? You guy's also have second
year man, Shannon Sharpe. I think he's Sterling's younger brother?
Too bad about Sewage...uhh I mean Sewell, looks like the doinks
already falling apart at the seams and the season hasn't even started
yet...
Carlos
|
36.1045 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Jul 29 1992 18:32 | 17 |
| Shannon Sharpe is in season #3 and is Sterlings brother.
All Denvers more reliable 3rd down players are out, so it seems.
Micheal Young, Sewell, and the Vance. The only one left is Biff.
^
^
Yes Carlos, Young had back surgery a few months back.
Maybe the donks could pick up that stiff from the faids that used to
play in Chicago (Gault). Then again the rookies can play better than
him;^)
Any other Bronco news?
Tim
|
36.1046 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:39 | 15 |
| Speaking of that stiff (Gault), the faids are putting the pressure on
him, and are gonna be expecting alot more production from all of their
WR's this coming year. "We're looking for production out of our
receivers," said offensive coordinator Terry Robiskie. "This season we
plan to get the ball to them more. We have to go back to the '90 season
where Willie caught about 50 balls and led the team in receiving
yardage. Mervyn caught 52 balls and led the team in receiving and Tim
had about 35 catches. Last season we didn't have that ratio. Willie was
down, Mervyn was down and Ethan Horton led the team. There's nothing
wrong with Ethan leading, but for the Raiders to win we need to get one
of those million dollar receivers and let them lead in receiving. This
year I'm looking for everybody to produce in the receiver category.
Brown, Gault, Graddy, and Fernandez will have to do the job."
Carlos
|
36.1047 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Jul 30 1992 12:45 | 28 |
| More bad news as far as receivers go:
Vance will undergo exploratory surgery this morning on his right
shoulder. It's probable that he has a tear in his muscle which would
put him out for quite a while. Worst case scenario would be a complete
tear, which would put him out for a minimum of 3 months.
RE: Young
He's not expected back anytime soon - he was quoted a few nights ago as
saying, "it would be a miracle if I was ready for the regular season
opener."
Carl Pickens would *really* be looking good in a Denver uniform right
now.
Sammie Smith was examined yesterday to see if his groin pull might be a
tear instead. No tear was found, but he still won't play Monday night.
Elway will only play 1 or 2 series Monday night (about 8-12 plays).
Pelluer will see extensive action with Moore finishing up. Maddox
won't see any action against SF but will get some playing time in the
2nd and/or 3rd preseason games.
The early opinions out of camp are that the defensive will be great,
but there are major concerns about the injuries at WR and depth on the
offensive line.
Joe
|
36.1048 | Graddy can't catch to good | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Jul 30 1992 18:42 | 14 |
| Depth on the offensive line a concern? I've heard this for the last
5 years!
WR is a real concern. RB can be questionable to. Smith has been
hurt and Sewell gone. I don't think Gaston will have the type of year
that he did last year. I hope I'm wrong, but with the heavy defenses
in the NFC east, he don't stand a chance. Lewis may get alot of
playing time.
Does anyone have a list of unsigned players?
Tim...who doesn't like to waist his money on the local rag just to
read the sports section.
|
36.1049 | Donks = 0-1 after Week #1 ! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Jul 31 1992 11:51 | 17 |
| >> -< Graddy can't catch to good >-
True, true,....very true, I guess he's another project of uncle Al's.
They (Belitnekof sp?, and co.) have been working with him though, and I
expect that he'll either blossom this year, or he'll be gone. Last year
Graddy only caught something like 5 passes, but in those 5 passes he
averaged an impressive 32.5 yards/catch. So he has alot of potential if
they can teach him how to hang on to the ball....but that might be a
big 'IF'. Because of his blazing speed, he is also a somewhat effective
return man. Through the years, uncle Al (or should I say 'Hall of
Fame Al') has had some pretty good success with his little projects.
A recent example, Ethan Horton, was a former first round RB that was
cut by the Chiefs only to be converted to a Probowl TE by none other
than 'HoF Al'. Hopefully, Graddy will be the next success story....
Carlos
|
36.1050 | | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Jul 31 1992 11:59 | 5 |
36.1051 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jul 31 1992 12:13 | 25 |
|
They found that Vance did have a torn muscle up around his shoulder and
will miss at least half of the regular season.
> RB can be questionable to.
Say what??? Yea, Sewell's out, but he was mainly used as a utility
player/3rd-down specialist/receiver out of the backfield. And Smith's
injury is just a groin pull, although this isn't the way he wanted to
start off in Denver.
> Does anyone have a list of unsigned players?
I think there's 5 left: Ron Holmes, Warren Powers, Jeff Davidson,
Harvey Salem, and Shannon Sharpe.
> Tim...who doesn't like to waist his money on the local rag just to
> read the sports section.
Hey Tim, the Jokezette is a great paper...that is, if you want to get
your Bronco/Buff news a day late and all you're interested in is
figure skating and the Calhan Sky Sox.
Joe
|
36.1052 | reeves gets the denver boot | MSBOS::DINSMORE | MARLINS, AND SHARKS FEAST | Fri Jul 31 1992 12:33 | 5 |
| Denver may win 7 games this year, 3 or 4 by Elways scrambling..
tough year for denver...
|
36.1053 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Fri Jul 31 1992 18:44 | 13 |
| Like I said, I hope I'm wrong about Gaston, but time will tell.
Smith???? Hopefully this trade works, but I see Bobby being the
biggest loss of all, IMO. Smith has to prove himself to me. He had a
good offensive line in Miami. The fish OL is more pass protection
oriented, but still good nonetheless. Bobby should do great there!
RB are who, Green, Lewis, Smith and the 2 FB's Alexander and
Perryman? I guess I got spoiled (so to speak) over the last 2-3 years,
because it took Denver most of the 80's to get good running backs.
Winder was ok, but nothing like Humphrey was/is.
Tim
|
36.1054 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:08 | 32 |
| The first glorified scrimmage takes place tonight with Denver taking on
the Niners in SF. The best part of this game is, it'll pre-empt the
stupid Olympics. HA!
Don't expect much out of the offense tonight with Elway only playing a
series or two. Pelluer, who is still having a rough camp, will get
most of the work tonight.
11th-round pick WR Cedric Tillman has been looking good and may have a
shot at making the team with all the injuries at WR - keep an eye on
him. Russell needs to do well in the preseason since he's projected to
be one of the starting WR's. Other newcomers to watch are Stanley
Morgan and Jon Bostick.
Chuck Johnson, the 4th-round pick, will probably start at LT. He moved
up to the first team when Frank Pollack strained his back.
Shane Dronett and Kenny Walker will start at the defensive ends with
Holmes and Powers still holding out. Dronett has been impressive in
camp.
David Treadwell will have to face a stiff challenge from Tracy Bennett
for the place-kicking job. This battle could go down to the last
preseason game.
DB Frank Robinson (5th round pick) should get most of the punt/kickoff
return duties tonight.
The only holdouts remaining are Holmes, Powers, and Harvey Salem.
Joe
|
36.1055 | Turn out he lights, the parties over..... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:31 | 22 |
| >> Hopefully this trade works, but I see Bobby being the biggest
>> loss of all, IMO.
I think you're right about Green, and the Humprey trade Tim. The donks
had in Humphrey, probably the highest quality RB to ever put on a
bronco uniform, and instead of recognizing this and keeping him happy
they dump him off the first chance they get...in exchange for a
mediocre RB. Brainstorms like this is what will keep the donks from
taking the next step to greatness, and keep them as just a good team
IMHO. The donks would have been in a lot better position right now if:
*they woulda kept Humphrey & Green in the backfield.
*get bucky some protection (and I don't mean a condem) on the line.
*and maybe go after a WR (although there was no way for them to forsee
the Vance gettin injured) or a quality TE.
Maybe they can teach Maddox to block, or catch some balls....?
Carlos
|
36.1056 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 03 1992 13:34 | 21 |
| Doesn't Holmes hold out about every year? As to Salem holding out,
to me he hasn't shown that he deserves more pay.
If whomever plays left tackle well this year, then the Broncos
offense may be better than predicted. Healthy Elway = good offensive
season....
Montana will not play from what I've heard. I thought his elbow was
100%?
Pelluer is a slug! I wouldn't mind seeing Moore or Maddix, which I
heard Maddix won't play.
Joe, where are you getting the camp reports for performance? I hope
its not Ralph Rotten...
It would be nice to see a new DB come on strong and replace Wyman at
CB.
Tim
|
36.1057 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 03 1992 15:40 | 21 |
|
> *and maybe go after a WR (although there was no way for them to forsee
> the Vance gettin injured) or a quality TE.
True, there was no way they could foresee the injuries to Young, Vance,
and Sewell, but they also couldn't have been less prepared to deal with
this rash of injuries. As for TE, that position is actually pretty
strong with Kay, Awalt, Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
No, Tim, I'm not getting my reports from Rotten. Hell, I'd believe
Carlos before I'd believe him. :^)
BTW, speaking of camp performance reports, Wymon is having a good camp
while Braxton is having a great camp.
Montana won't play tonight because his arm is still bothering him.
Maddox isn't expected to play either.
Joe
|
36.1058 | Is tonight's game being telervized? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Aug 03 1992 17:11 | 15 |
| >> No, Tim, I'm not getting my reports from Rotten. Hell, I'd
>> believe Carlos before I'd believe him. :^)
Hey thanks alot Joe....
>> As for TE, that position is actually pretty strong with Kay, Awalt,
>> Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
These dudes are more the blocking type of TE's though aren't they?
I was thinking more along the lines of Pittsburgh's Green, or the
Raider's Horton type of TE. The kind that's a better receiver than
blocker. They coulda traded up for Brown, or that other kid I think the
Jets got.
Carlos
|
36.1059 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 03 1992 17:55 | 22 |
| > -< Is tonight's game being telervized? >-
Only up here in Colorado. It's not national, if that's what you're
asking. Anyone who's watching the game might want to turn down the
sound and listen to the radio because Hank Stram will be doing the
color on the radio. Stram will be doing the color on the radio for 4
of the 5 Bronco preseason games because the normal color guy, Dave
Logan, will be doing the color for the TV broadcast. Not to take
anything from Logan, because I really like his work, but Stram is
excellent IMO. He does color for CBS radio on Monday night games.
> >> As for TE, that position is actually pretty strong with Kay, Awalt,
> >> Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
> These dudes are more the blocking type of TE's though aren't they?
Kay and Johnson are more of the blocking type, but Awalt was a good
receiver in Dallas before Novacek came along and Sharpe is a converted
WR.
Joe
|
36.1060 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 03 1992 17:57 | 13 |
| Tonights game is on the local FOX station.
As to Rotten, I was just razzin'....
I was just informed by the wife that I now have plans fur
tonight..O'well, maybe I can tape it though it probably won't be worth
watching seeing how it don't count and I will probably know the score
by the time I get home! Then again seeing the rookies play would be
good. Decisions decisions
Tj
|
36.1061 | Quarterback | COMET::FARMER | | Tue Aug 04 1992 01:24 | 3 |
| Did Pelleur (Sp) play as badly as I have Heard? And did Elway play at
all? Just wondering.
|
36.1062 | Only 4 more of these to go... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 04 1992 13:40 | 66 |
| Pretty much as expected last night, with the offenses struggling in a
low-scoring game. Denver's mistakes came in the form of fumbles (although
their lone penalty was a crucial one, putting SF in field goal range right
before the half) while SF's came in the form of penalties. The 1st-team
defense looked pretty good but not great, getting good pressure on Young but
they also left some good holes over the middle for SF's receivers. SF's
short passing game sure is good, Montana or no Montana. The 1st-team offense,
although not complete with Elway sitting out, looked fair at best. They got
a couple first downs and gave the QB's okay protection, but Pelluer was off
the mark all night and in a preseason game this early they're never in long
enough to get into a rhythm.
Players who impressed:
Shawn Moore - He was presumed to be as good as gone, but scrambled and threw
the ball well last night. However, he has still never taken a snap in a
regular season game and there's alot of preseason left where he must continue
to prove himself.
Greg Lewis - Kind of a bittersweet game for Greg. He had 2 fumbles and only
averaged 3.4 yards a carry, but he ran hard and had a beautiful move on his
TD reception. Also showed great effort on that 4th and 1 conversion when he
basically got the first down on his own after being hit at the line of
scrimmage. He caught 3 passes.
Stanley Morgan - Caught every ball thrown his way. Had 4 catches for 46 yards.
Mark Jackson - Had 3 catches, but was also wide open 3 or 4 times when
Pelluer didn't get the ball anywhere near him.
Mecklenberg - 3 sacks, plus a few QB pressures.
Dronett - Didn't get any sacks, but was putting some good pressure on.
Keith Traylor - Seemed to be all over the place; had 9 solo tackles.
Frank Robinson - Showed some positive signs returning punts and kickoffs. Made
one big mistake by letting a punt go over his head, but that's what the
preseason's for.
Players who didn't impress:
Pelluer - Showed some poise, but was off the mark all night. The backup job
may be his to lose, but he'll need to get sharper with Moore playing that well.
Derek Russell - Had one thrown to him late in the game that he probably
should've caught. The fact that he didn't have many thrown his way tells me
he's not doing a very good job of getting open.
The battle for the kicking job never got going because they didn't get any
field goal attempts. Bennett did have one kickoff that went inside the 5.
I wanted to see Hagan get some more attempts returning punts but most of them
were kicked out of bounds. The couple he did catch the Broncos had good
coverage.
For SF, I thought Amp Lee looked real good. Wasn't too impressed with Watters.
Joe
|
36.1063 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Aug 04 1992 14:19 | 20 |
|
Have
the
donks
ever
won
an
NFL
Championship
?????????
|
36.1064 | :-) | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Aug 04 1992 15:34 | 9 |
| Are
You
Kidding!
Shouldn't these be posted in the Jokes topic...
Carlos
|
36.1065 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Aug 04 1992 15:37 | 24 |
|
I
thought
this
was
the
jokes
topic...?
Did you actually hit return enough times to get to this point?
|
36.1066 | | GENRAL::WADE | fill yer hands you <CENSORED>!! | Tue Aug 04 1992 16:25 | 8 |
|
Hold on there WATERboy, er, I mean iceMan. Tain't the regular
season yet! We Bronco fans aren't awake yet.........
BTW, what is the Brownies record against the Donks in AFC
champeenship games? :*)
Claybone
|
36.1067 | Nyah! | SHALOT::MEDVID | there is really no-one left | Tue Aug 04 1992 16:50 | 4 |
| > Did you actually hit return enough times to get to this point?
No. So there.
|
36.1068 | Yapping after 1st pre-season game | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Tue Aug 04 1992 18:24 | 5 |
| Iceman will be put on ice come regular season. He will dissapear
after week 6. He won't be able to stand the ridicule (sp?) that the
brownies fans will have coming.
Tim
|
36.1069 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Aug 06 1992 11:54 | 8 |
| Another Bronco WR goes down. Some rookie who's name slips me has a
seperated shoulder. Kay has a bruised knee and Pollack (sp?) OT was
sent home because he needed to many pain killers to play.
With all these people going down, I'm wondering if the defense is
hitting that hard or if its bad luck?
Tim
|
36.1070 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 06 1992 13:38 | 13 |
| The rookie WR that got hurt is Harold Robinson - he wouldn't have made
the team anyway.
Kay will be out for a month, max, and that's only if he needs
arthroscopic surgery.
Smith is still bothered by that groin pull.
Moore will come in after Elway and will get some work with the first
team Saturday.
Joe
|
36.1071 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Aug 06 1992 17:57 | 1 |
| What time is the game sat?
|
36.1072 | 4pm | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Aug 06 1992 19:10 | 4 |
| Don't ask me why it's so damm early. However, the players said it's
fine with them because they're leaving for Berlin Sunday morning.
Joe
|
36.1073 | Go Broncos | BSS::BSORENSON | The Battler | Thu Aug 06 1992 19:38 | 4 |
| What's wrong with the game starting at 4pm on Saturday? Doesn't your
wife let you have a beer that early?
B_Bob
|
36.1074 | Go back to sleep, Sorenson | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:56 | 1 |
|
|
36.1075 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 10 1992 11:42 | 12 |
| I saw the 1st half and some of the 2nd.
Elway's arm looks great! I will be suprised if Shawn Moore doesn't
make the #2 QB. I won't be suprised if Reeves keeps Pelluer just
because its Dan Reeves we are talking about, not to mention Pelluer is
an ex-Cowboy.
What can you say about Atwater....DEfense will be good again, but
still needs that impact DE.
Tim
|
36.1076 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 10 1992 14:09 | 36 |
|
> What can you say about Atwater....DEfense will be good again, but
> still needs that impact DE.
The defense should be very good, and the linebacking quartet should be among
the league's best. One of the few down points of the defense is that most of
the pressure is coming from the linebackers and not the linemen. The have a
couple good young linemen in Walker and Dronett and a promising free agent
in Mark Flythe. Holmes signed over the weekend just in time to make the trip
to Berlin, leaving Powers as the only holdout left.
More on the 2nd glorified scrimmage:
Elway looked very sharp...It's starting to look like Jackson will be Elway's
main go-to receiver...Moore continues to impress as the backup. He has great
mobility and has been pretty accurate, but maybe most importantly has shown
good poise back in the pocket...Robinson appears on his way to nailing down
a roster spot with some good returns. Free-agent Arthur Marshall also got a
few returns but I don't think he has much of a chance...Elway got pretty good
pass protection from the first-team OL.
There were also some bad points:
Lewis looks good when he runs the ball, but had another fumble. He didn't play
after that fumble because of a bruised hand he suffered in the SF game, which
he said was the reason he fumbled. Regardless, if he keeps putting the ball on
the ground, he'll see plenty of pine time this fall...Pelluer is quickly
playing himself off the team, and may already be too far behind in the backup
race to take over Shawn Moore, especially when you consider that he may not
see much playing time because Reeves will start giving some time to Maddox.
Pelluer had 2 fumbles against Tampa...The running game hasn't done much - Denver
averaged less than 3 yards a rush the other night...Russell dropped a couple
catchable balls, and then suffered some bruised ribs, but it isn't expected to
be serious...Kay will have arthroscopic surgery done on his knee and will be
out about 3-4 weeks.
Joe
|
36.1077 | CUT "P" MAN..... | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Mon Aug 10 1992 16:13 | 7 |
|
Hey Joe, Shawn Moore is looking better every game...Danny Boy would
be crazy to cut him and stupid not have him to have him play behind
the " P " man (steve pelluer).
Drewski
|
36.1078 | donks = 0-1 after week 1 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Aug 11 1992 14:01 | 15 |
| >> The defense should be very good, and the linebacking quartet
>> should be among the league's best.
Sorry Joe, but I'm gonna have to dis-agree. I'll give you that the
donk's LB's are good, but not among the leagues best. I know that
you'll proberly point me to lasted years stats to try and prove your
point, but the only problem there is that the donks only played three
teams (regular season) that were above .500 . That kind of schedule
will make any average defense look great. This year will be a better
indicator of just how tough their defense is.....
Anyhow, I don't think Denver's LBs are in the same class as N.O.'s, or
K.C.'s, Giants, Eagles......etc...
Carlopski
|
36.1079 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 11 1992 15:03 | 22 |
|
> Anyhow, I don't think Denver's LBs are in the same class as N.O.'s, or
> K.C.'s, Giants, Eagles......etc...
What I meant about the 'backers being "among the league's best" is not that
they *are* the league's best, but definitely in the top 4 or 5. I'll give ya
that NO's are better, even though a couple of their guys are getting up there
in age. And even though LT has lost a little bit off his game, the Giants'
'backers are slightly better too. But I don't think the Eagles have anything
on Denver because remember we're only taking about a group of 3 and that with
that great defensive line it's easy for the LB's to look good. And I'll flat-
out say that Denver has a better group than KC. Okay, they may have the
best outside LB in the game with Derrick Thomas, but after him it's pretty
average.
Fletcher had 13.5 sacks last year and is already 2nd on the Broncos all-time
sack list. He's one of the league's most underrated players. Brooks does a
superb job against the run on the inside, but is playing in the shadow of
Mecklenberg. And Croel is one of the league's rising stars.
Joe
|
36.1080 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Aug 11 1992 15:45 | 21 |
| >> What I meant about the 'backers being "among the league's best"
>> is not that they *are* the league's best,
Ok, I got it the first time, but I still disagree...
>> but definitely in the top 4 or 5.
Get out! I'd be interested to know which are the three or four that you
think are better. IMHO, the: Bills, Chiefs (again), Chargers, Skins,
Eagles, Giants, Cardinals, Lions, Saints, and 49'ers are all as good or
better than the donks with regards to LBs.
As far as the comparison between the donks and the chiefs, I know I'd
much rather have Thomas than Fletcher, and Percy Snow is at least as
good as Brooks against the run (although he was out last year with an
ankle injury), and Croel does have a bright future, but right now he's
not much better than average.
Carlopski
|
36.1081 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:54 | 3 |
| Cards, Lions, Chargers, 9'rs?
Carlos Carlos, your in envy....
|
36.1082 | This is getting ridiculous... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:56 | 15 |
| > IMHO, the: Bills, Chiefs (again), Chargers, Skins,
> Eagles, Giants, Cardinals, Lions, Saints, and 49'ers are all as good or
> better than the donks with regards to LBs.
> Croel does have a bright future, but right now he's
> not much better than average.
With statements like these, it's quite apparent to me that you just don't
*want* to believe that the Denver 'backers are that good. Believe what you
want - hell, you still think Schroeder can take the Raiders to the SB.
Joe
|
36.1083 | WHO IS THE BEST SET OF LB'S ??? | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Tue Aug 11 1992 17:14 | 13 |
|
Can you guys name the top LB's, starting with the team then the
players. I can't really think of to many teams that have 3 or 4 top
LB's playing together really tough. The last team to accomplish that was
the Bears.
I must say that Meck, Croel, Fletcher, Brooks, are definately in the
top 3 if not the best IMO.
Drewski
|
36.1084 | When I count to 3, you will be un-hypnotyzed..1...2.. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Aug 11 1992 18:44 | 42 |
| >> Carlos Carlos, your in envy....
Nah Tim, really I'm not, I even said that the donk LB's were good.
Pardon me if I ain't swallowing all that donk propaganda stuff they've
been feeding you guy's up there, but I just happen to think that there
are other teams with LB's that are *at LEAST* as good as the donkey
ones. You guys act like if they're the Saints' LB'ers just cause they
had a good year last year. But you guys keep forgettin they had a very
weak schedule, and if you think they'll have it near as easy this year
your cracked.
IMHO, out of the four LB's mentioned: Meck, Fletch, Brooks, & Croel.
Meck is a shadow of his former self, and at this point in his career
he's not much better than an average LB'er. Croel is just the opposite,
he's young and aggressive, (and he'll proberly be one of the best in a
couple of years) but for now he has a limited grasp of his role, and is
also limited in his technique...again not much better than average. The
two remaining, Fletch & Brooks, are definitely the class of their unit,
and are above average, and if I were on a steady diet of donky prop
I'd proberly think they were the best in the league too, but I'm not,
and I don't. Now then, since I think that these two knuckle-heads are
the class of the unit, and I think that most teams have LB's that can
play at the level of Croel & Meck, I'll just compare Fletch and Brooks
to the class of some other teams LB'er units I've already mentioned.
S.F. Tim Harris & Charles Haley.....at least as good if not better
S.D. Leslie O'Neil & Junior Seau .." "
Buf. Cornelius Bennett & Darly Talley" "
K.C. Derrick Thomas & Percy Snow..." "
Skins Wilber Marshall & Andre Collins." "
Phil Seth Joyner & Byron Evans ......." "
Giants L.T. & Carl Banks.............." "
Cards Freddie Joe Nunn & Ken Harvey..." "
Lions Chris Spielman & George Jamison." "
Saints..the worst two from this unit are" "
HtH
Carlopski
|
36.1085 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Two JaKes... Your Worst Nightmare | Tue Aug 11 1992 19:19 | 8 |
|
AHHHHH YES !!! Looks like the Donks are off to yet another brilliant
season. Looking for the Donks to take the AFC this year and Crush the
NFC in the STUPIDbowl...
Big Game (Who Could Be Looking For A Long Time)
|
36.1086 | Change that P_name BG | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Aug 12 1992 11:52 | 27 |
| Well Cacti, good to see you noting again!
As to LB's, I don't think they are the best, but do qualify to be
towards the top! Meck is in his last year IMO, so look for him to be
a man on a mission this year. Croel will shine barring injuries.
Fletcher will do what he has the last 2-3 years. Brooks has the
potential, but is slow on pass coverage.
The safety's are two of the best. The only safety that might/is
better than Atwater is Lott. Dennis Smith is within the top 5-6.
And all of this will be determined I guess.
IMO, I don't think all these NFC teams have really potent offenses,
but they do have the defenses. The skins might be the exception to
that rule. The Broncos don't play the 9'rs whom we know what they
have, even without Joe.
Denver vs potent offenses = Skins, oilers, bills. Maybe Dallas and
philly depending on aikman and hershal, but not likely.
The other teams have mediocr - average offenses at best IMO.
Tim
|
36.1087 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:09 | 35 |
| > You guys act like if they're the Saints' LB'ers just cause they
> had a good year last year.
Not one person in here has called them the Saints' 'backers. I even said the
Saints have a better group. And *you* are the one who keeps pointing to last
year and the weak schedule. For one thing Croel has only been around one year,
pal. Fletcher has 56 career sacks (and is 5th on the Broncos' all-time sack
list, not 2nd as I previously stated), and over the past 2 seasons only Pat
Swilling and Derrick Thomas have more sacks among linebackers.
> Meck is a shadow of his former self, and at this point in his career
> he's not much better than an average LB'er. Croel is just the opposite,
> he's young and aggressive, (and he'll proberly be one of the best in a
> couple of years) but for now he has a limited grasp of his role, and is
> also limited in his technique...again not much better than average.
Here's where your argument really falls apart, saying that Meck and Croel are
just a little better than average. Meck had 3 sacks in less than a half of
action against SF and oh, by the way, Croel was defensive rookie of the year
last season (since you seem to have forgotten).
Back at camp in Berlin:
Holmes showed up totally out of shape and was placed on the "Player unable to
perform" list for a couple of weeks.
Maddox will get some time this week and Pelluer will get little or no time.
Smith is still being bothered by that groin pull.
Joe
|
36.1088 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Aug 12 1992 13:27 | 15 |
| It looks like the Smith trade is even worse than I thought. I hope
he gets over this groin problem so he can show us his worth.
I'm not a bit suprised about Holmes. He did this 2-3 years ago when
he 1st came from Tampa. This is one point of mine when it comes to no
justification for more $$$. He sits out, gets more $$$ just to sit out
because he was lazy. Don't look for a good year out of him. DAnny
will sit him on the bench, and I wouldn't be suprised to see him outta
here this year or before next years start.
The defense will be tested this weekend. Marino and company
are about as good as any offense in the league, especially passing!!!
Will Wymon be burned? Probably.
Tim
|
36.1089 | | QUASER::HUNTER | A Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of Course | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:22 | 1 |
| Hows this Tim !!
|
36.1090 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Aug 13 1992 13:05 | 6 |
| BG, I didn't know you watched Mr. Ed on Nick @nite.....
Are going to the opener? I'm trying to get tix, but might have to
scalp it
Tim
|
36.1091 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Aug 13 1992 13:09 | 6 |
| >> Are going to the opener?
Wish I was....
Carlitos
|
36.1092 | Broncos and Dallas in the SB this year !! | QUASER::HUNTER | A Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of Course | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:37 | 11 |
| Already got 4, TJ... In FACK(tm) I might have 2 extra. A buddy
of mine (yea I've got one friend) is coming out from Wisc. on vacation
right about that time so I have to wait to hear from him weather
he'll be here out not. If he's a no show I'll let ya know.
P.s. Only paid 20 a ticket for second deck 30 yrd line seats in the
closed end on the sunny side... YOU GOTTA LOVE IT !! I'll sell
ya the extras (if they are) for lets say 45 or 50 bucks ;^)
No... I'll give em to ya for cost.
BG
|
36.1093 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:42 | 10 |
|
>> -< Broncos and Dallas in the SB this year !! >-
Heaven help us if that happens. That means a Dallas SB championship and
I can't think of too many things in football that are as insufferable as
that.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1094 | Sounds good Jack! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:53 | 4 |
| Carlos, its a long drive to watch yur faiders lose.
Tim
|
36.1095 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | A Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of Course | Thu Aug 13 1992 15:56 | 3 |
| Good line TJ... It is an awfal long drive !!
BG
|
36.1096 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Aug 13 1992 16:54 | 11 |
| Yeah but, it's only about an hour as the vulture flies, and there ought
to be plenty of vultures there after the game picking up the bronco
scraps that the Raiders leave behind. :-)
Seriously though, I've been noting with you guys for about five years
now, and you all ain't had the common curtesy to invite me up there
(all expenses paid, of course), to witness your expressionless faces
after the romps! What gives? :-)
Curly Toes
|
36.1097 | dial 1-800-cry-wagh ;^) | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Thu Aug 13 1992 19:04 | 18 |
| Romps? 20-17, 27-24, 12-9, 7-6, etc...I wouldn't call those romps,
and the Broncos will only win this 1st game by less than 7 if history
repeats.
Sure come on up NO EXPENSES PAID! I'm hoping to save enough before
then to take at least me and the wifey. Depending on tix prices, it
usually costs about $100 bucks for 2 people after paying for beer, gas,
beer, tickets, food, & more beer and I'm the only one drinkin the beer.
I think I have the above in order except the food is optional (as
needed). I heard face value for "none 50 yard line 1st level tickets"
are running at $35 a pop. Does that sound right Cacti?
We will probably take a faider fan with us, even though the last 2
years that he has gone to faids-donks game, the donks have lost at home.
Tim
|
36.1098 | tids and bits | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:45 | 16 |
| What an ugly game Sat vs the fish. Of course that is what pre-season
is all about!
#1 defense unit looked good. Picked off Marino 3x. Smith gave
Humphrey a cheap shot.
Denver needs a running game!
Maddox looked like Elway did in his 1st game, but once Miami quit
blitzing and he completed his 1st couple of passes, he seemed to do
ok. Drove down for 2 tds, but he also helped Miami score 3x in the
3rd qtr.
Time will tell, but he may very good.
Tim
|
36.1099 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Mon Aug 17 1992 14:48 | 7 |
| I didn't see the game.....could you describe the cheap shot by Smith?
I did happen to catch a replay of Humphrey getting his ribs wrapped....
how did the injury come to pass....and is he healthy?
Nelly
|
36.1100 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 17 1992 15:19 | 40 |
| > What an ugly game Sat vs the fish. Of course that is what pre-season
> is all about!
I don't think they get much uglier than that. 10 turnovers and 16 penalties
between the 2 teams...Ouch! The first-team offense had a familiar problem
again - the inability to get 6 when they're in scoring position, although
much of that was due to their penalties and turnovers. It was quite obvious
that Denver wanted to work on the running game and it showed slight improvement,
but it's still not close to where it should be for Sept. 6th. Mark Jackson
continues to look good and Russell finally came alive, while Awalt has
disappeared the past 2 games. Moore looked good again, but hurt his left
shoulder and they should find out how serious it is today. Lanier got hurt
also (foot) and it was at first thought to be a broken bone, but now they're
saying it's probably only a sprain. Talk about a position they can't afford an
injury. Reggie Rivers may be working his way onto the roster as Sewell's
replacement. He's been effective as a receiver/safety valve out of the
backfield and occasionally running the ball, with most of his work coming on
3rd downs.
Defense continues to look good as Tim said, and all Miami's scoring came against
backups or a mix of starters and backups.
Treadwell's job appears to be safe.
> Maddox looked like Elway did in his 1st game, but once Miami quit
> blitzing and he completed his 1st couple of passes, he seemed to do
> ok. Drove down for 2 tds, but he also helped Miami score 3x in the
> 3rd qtr.
The thing that impressed me most about this kid is the way he settled down after
that horrendous start. After a few sacks, 2 fumbles, and an interception you'd
think he would totally lose confidence but he came back nicely. I noticed on
his 2nd or 3rd series, he was under great pressure and was running up out of the
pocket but still had the alertness to spot an open receiver over the middle.
He throws a nice-looking ball, but was off target quite a few times and tried
to force it in where he couldn't. He has nice touch on the ball. He'll need
some time but he's got plenty of that.
Joe
|
36.1101 | (Is this real or lumor ) | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Mon Aug 17 1992 16:58 | 6 |
| I got word that Denver is trying to make a deal with the 9ers for Rice.
something like sammie smith and keith traylor plus a draft pick.
Any Truth to this rumor.
Drewski
|
36.1102 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Mon Aug 17 1992 17:36 | 4 |
| 1st I heard of it. $15mil is alot of money for a wide reciever, or
anyone for that matter. At 1st I thought it was a baseball contract.
Tim
|
36.1103 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 17 1992 17:37 | 3 |
| It'd take more than Smith and Traylor to get Rice, that's for sure.
Joe
|
36.1104 | Is He worth it??? | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Mon Aug 17 1992 17:53 | 4 |
| I think the question is Rice worth it and would he be the impac player
the Broncos need.
Drewski
|
36.1105 | I smell toast !!! | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Mon Aug 17 1992 18:10 | 6 |
| � I think the question is Rice worth it and would he be the impac player
� the Broncos need.
Go back and check your Super Bowl XXIV tapes.
Bob Hunt
|
36.1106 | pelluer gone.... | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Tue Aug 18 1992 15:51 | 6 |
|
Just got word that the Broncos cut pelluer and 5 other players.
Drewski
|
36.1107 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Aug 19 1992 13:57 | 14 |
| Pelleur is gone, no suprise, but then again he was a cowboy.
The only other 1/2 name was Mark Murray LB. He showed potential, but
never really got ontrack.
Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
following people?
Mike Young, Vance, Moore, Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
may have forgotten.
thx
Tim
|
36.1108 | Smith vs. Humphrey | BSS::BSORENSON | The Battler | Wed Aug 19 1992 14:27 | 11 |
|
This is how it happened:
It was Humphrey's second carry and he went through the middle. Brooks
grabbed him and was taking him down by waist and legs. Before Humphrey
was down, Dennis flew head first into Bobby's ribs. Dennis came out of
it with a slight concussion and a jammed neck. He told the reporters
that it was not a cheap shot. "Bobby wasn't down when I hit him,"
Smith said. Humphrey accused Smith of being a "headhunter."
B_Bob
|
36.1109 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:29 | 20 |
| > Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
> following people?
>
> Mike Young, Vance, Moore, Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
> may have forgotten.
Young - Projected to be ready for the 3rd or 4th game.
Vance - Not sure, but I think it's about midseason.
Moore - Slight separation of his left shoulder, might play in the final
preason game.
Kay - Might be ready for the season opener.
Lanier - Wasn't serious, might be ready for the Team of the 90's on Saturday.
Others:
Dennis Smith - Wasn't serious, will be back practicing in the next few days (or
is already).
Sammie Smith - Took part in full practice yesterday, might play Saturday.
Joe
|
36.1110 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:32 | 6 |
| >> Kay - Might be ready for the season opener.
Doesn't really matter, seeing as how they're gonna lose it anyway! :-)
Curly Toes
|
36.1111 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Al Bundies feet=Ford Con. | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:57 | 1 |
| Tanks Joe!
|
36.1112 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 24 1992 13:27 | 23 |
| Well, the Broncos are already starting to hit midseason form - i.e., the
offense is looking stagnant and making mistakes when they get down near the
opponent's goal line. Elway had 2 interceptions and both were badly thrown
balls, especially the 2nd one. Green broke free and showed his speed in
running for a 60-yard touchdown but that was called back by a holding penalty.
Smith looked fair at best, and when he did get off a nice run late in the game
he fumbled at the end of it. Maddox continues to look like the rookie that he
is but he isn't getting much time playing behind the 2nd-team offensive line.
Still, he needs to do a better job of getting rid of the ball sooner.
First-unit defense gave up their first TD of the preseason but still looks very
tough. They missed numerous opportunities at interceptions. The thing that
bothers me most about the defense is even though they've gotten some decent
pressure on the QB's, they haven't had any sacks since the first game.
On to the positives. Looks like free-agent WR Arthur Marshall has himself a
spot on this team. He had 6 catches the other night and looks good doing the
return duties. Alton Montgomery laid some serious hits and was all over the
place - I think he was in on every play on Dallas last drive in the 3rd quarter.
Russell caught 7 balls and showed some nice moves after the catch.
Joe
|
36.1113 | Dallas 1 Denver -1 |DIFFERENCE| = 2 | BSS::G_HEDRICK | Hangin' in there! | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:17 | 6 |
| re. -1
Broncos looked normal as far as I could tell. Gonna be hard to beat
them pokes this year!!
TEX
|
36.1114 | Maddox just needs more time | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Not sitting and waiting, but wondering | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:20 | 28 |
| re-1
Agree with ya Joe. I caught most of the game, and the 1st offense
better get it together! The 1st string defense won't be able to play
great all year if they end up being on the field more than not!
Elway looked lost. It looked like his out of every 4-5 games "bad game"
that he has been known to have. The offesnive line needs to find their
run blocking. Pass blocking has been good (1st string). Give Reggie
Rivers the start at RB next. He has shown more potential this year
than Green has.
Smith looked ok, but did fumble after a 13 yard run. Isn't that why
Miami wanted to dump him? Hope he still works out, but don't count on
it.
Wymon was back to old form when it came to covering(not) a good
reciever.
Is Montgomery Smith's or Atwaters backup? He looked good!
Like I said and you basically have re-iderated(sp?) is Denver still
needs an impact defensive lineman like Reggie White or Bruce Smith.
That would about complete Denvers defense.
Still need a OLT!!!!!!!!!
Tim
|
36.1115 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:26 | 10 |
| >> Denver still needs an impact defensive lineman..
How 'bout the fridge. Actually, I'd like the Raiders to pick him up,
can you imagine McGlokton and the fridge on the same team? Talk abouit
collapsed lines...
By the way, it looked like somebody put Elway in Schroeders uniform
this weekend....:-)
Carlos
|
36.1116 | Ink wired mines deen to wonk | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Running With The Devil (dog) | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:01 | 1 |
| Who's starting at RB?
|
36.1117 | Green | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:39 | 1 |
|
|
36.1118 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:56 | 11 |
| Most of the Bronco cuts yesterday were rookie free-agents, but among
the notables were Harvey Salem, 7th-round pick Jon Bostick, kicker Tracy
Bennett, and punter Daren Parker.
There is speculation that rookie free-agent Russell Freeman will move
in at left tackle and Jeff Davidson will move ahead of Sean Farrell at
left guard. Hope this works - something needs to be done with this
offensive line...
Joe
|
36.1119 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:02 | 10 |
| It's been made official by Reeves that Freeman will start at LT while
Davidson will move over to LG.
Powers signed yesteday - he was the last holdout.
Nattiel was cut by Tampa yesterday and Reeves said he will consider
bringing him back, but I doubt that will happen.
Joe
|
36.1120 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:26 | 5 |
| hey !! Is shawn moore on IR or what...
Could be a long year for the Donk faithful..
Dan Reeves has got to go.. the mans a complete $%^$%^#$%^&&#$%^
|
36.1121 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Aug 27 1992 18:03 | 22 |
|
>> hey !! Is shawn moore on IR or what...
================================================================================
Note 36.1109 Bronco notes 1109 of 1120
BSS::JCOTANCH 20 lines 19-AUG-1992 14:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
>> following people?
> >
> >>> Mike Young, Vance, Moore, Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
> > may have forgotten.
Moore >- Slight separation of his left shoulder, might play in the final
preason> game.
>Joe
HtH,
Carlos
|
36.1122 | Which layer of mid mgmt? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Avoid TAP, keep back against wall | Thu Aug 27 1992 18:06 | 20 |
| Moore will play 4th qtr Friday.
Offensivly, this team is in deep stink. The left side of the
offensive line doesn't exsist. A rookie is starting at OLT and
Davidson moved to left guard.
After reading the paper the last 2 days, it was shown that reeves
hasn't picked an OL in the 1st round since Hinton, and of course he was
traded for Elway.
Elway will most likely be injured this year unless the OL comes
around, which is unlikely.
Nattiel was cut by the bucs and did pass waivers, so he may come
back to Denver. I say it couldn't hurt to have him back, except
utilize him better. Reeves probably won't go for it though.
Maddox will not play friday, nor will Kay, Reggie Johnson.
Tim
|
36.1123 | Long..looonnngg...year for donk fans, BG. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Aug 27 1992 18:53 | 15 |
|
> Offensivly, this team is in deep stink. The left side of the
> offensive line doesn't exsist.
> Elway will most likely be injured this year unless the OL comes
> around, which is unlikely.
Yup, I think you're right about this Tim. The weakness in the left side
is gonna leave 'ol Bucky wide open to get blind-sided. Which means mega
fumbles, and possibly a chance for Reeves to test out his 1st round
pick after Bucky and Moore get their fair share of the hits.
Carlos
|
36.1124 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Aug 27 1992 20:50 | 11 |
| Here we go with the broken record routine again. "We're
going to do this-that-and-this to ELway. Boy is he in for
it now." Don't bet on it. Also don't bet on half the stuff
you read in the papers especially the tid bits from Ralph.
I agree with Big Game. Reeves needs someone to whomp him
a good one upside the haid although I doubt that would do
much good at this late a date. Let's tee it up and see it
kicked off. I've got a hunch the OL will take care of itself.
Let the games begin.
BoB
|
36.1125 | A loss at home? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Aug 31 1992 13:29 | 18 |
| The Broncos offensive problems still look the same. No running to
speak of. The OL did do better than the previous weeks, but better
get it together for the faiders or Biff will be scrambling all day,
'cause there won't be a running game.
One good thing I did see, was when the OL did good, Elway would go
pat them on the back. That is something I think he needs to continue.
If you show you have confidence in them, then "they" will play better
IMO.
Defense looked ok, but still needs to get a pass rush going unless
Wade is holding back the heavy blitzes for regular season.
Does anyone have the injury report? Atwater being the biggest
concern! Did Haliburton break his neck? Etc..
Tim
|
36.1126 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Aug 31 1992 15:34 | 19 |
| >> -< A loss at home? >-
With another coming....:-)
Can
Donk
fans
say
zero
and
one...??????
Carlosh
|
36.1127 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Aug 31 1992 16:42 | 19 |
| Yea Tim, there's no doubt the running game needs to pick it up a few
notches. I kept my eye on Freeman a few times and he was doing pretty
good - the main problem area now is Davidson at LG (not to say the left
tackle position is in great shape now).
The worst news out of this last preseason game is of course Atwater.
He'll probably miss the Faider game. As for Haliburton, that was far
more serious - his career may be over.
I loved it when Hill strolled thru the end zone and just sat in that
utility vehicle after catching that TD bomb that was called back. That
guy has some speed!
I haven't heard the cuts yet, but some of the likely big names to be on
that list are Perryman, Morgan, Awalt and Holmes. Smith reinjured his
groin and may end up on IR.
Joe
|
36.1128 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:00 | 20 |
| Reeves has decided to go with 2 kickers this year. They signed Brad
Daluiso, who was just cut by Dallas. He'll be used on kickoffs and
maybe on long field goals.
As somewhat expected, Nattiel was signed, giving the Broncos 4
wideouts. He is only expected to be a stopgap and probably won't be
around all season.
Also signed was Victor Jones, a big fullback waived by Houston.
Recalled to the roster wee linebackers Tim Lucas and John Sullins.
To make room for these players, placed Vance, Sewell, Sammie Smith, and
John Granby on IR. By placing these guys on IR after the 47-man roster
was declared Monday they're eligible to be activated anytime after the
4th game.
Rookie DB Frank Robinson was cut.
Joe
|
36.1129 | best available back, what's a po' boy to do. | CNTROL::CHILDS | If Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em' | Wed Sep 02 1992 12:07 | 10 |
|
glad to see Sewell and Smith on the IR. Should mean lots of carries for
Gaston Green starting RB of the Cosmic Misfits. Now if they can just cut
down on Elway's interceptions so the Donks hold to the ball longer I'll
be all set....
got to admit it gives me the willies knowing I'm going to have to root
for someone in Denver....
;^)
|
36.1130 | | USCTR1::NAHEARN | | Wed Sep 02 1992 13:46 | 4 |
| I was surprised to see Awalt waived!! Has he lost all his ability?
Nelly
|
36.1131 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Wed Sep 02 1992 14:27 | 1 |
| He can't block!
|
36.1132 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 02 1992 15:56 | 8 |
| In today's new.
Ralph claims the Donks go no better than 3-13. Then SI
writer Zimmerman(?) picks Donks to go all the way AND
win the bowl! I predict 10-6 overall. 6-2 at home
and 4-4 on the road seems reasonable at this point.
A 1-0 start would be wonderfull.
BoB
|
36.1133 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 02 1992 16:50 | 25 |
| Paul Zimmerman and I have had a major LDUC in the past.
Paul wrote that the Patriots stats crew was among the worst in the
league, claiming that we didn't know a sack when the QB got back to the
line of scrimmage was still a sack and claimed he got into an argument
with my predecessor. The argument never happened and we've always
known the rules on sacks. Very few things I've ever seen written have
made me more angry - I got slammed in a book that was published and
distributed nationwide, written by a writer with a national audience.
This happened in his book "The Thinking Man's Guide to Pro Football"
which except for one page is a good book. He has the same story in
both the first edition and the second edition and I think the incident
may have happened before the first edition was printed. He never
bothered to update it for the second edition.
Ever since then, I've taken everything Paul has written with a grain of
salt despite the fact that we've exchanged letters, met at a couple of
Patriots games and gotten our feelings off our chests. I put extra
pressure on myself when I know Paul will be attending one of our games,
to make sure we do everything letter perfectly and get the information
in for printing faster than even normal. I want to see him have that
paragraph out of the book if he ever reissues it.
John
|
36.1134 | My Personal Name Says It All !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Sep 02 1992 18:08 | 22 |
|
Well, Well, Well...
With the start of the season just around the corner things are looking
pretty bleak for the Donks. No offensive line, no running game,
hurting defense, big play boys on IR and a coach that has his head
so far up his %^& that he has to lift up his shirt and so he can
see out his navel. I can't remember that last time things lookd so
bad in Donk Land. My personal opinion... DAN HAS GOT TO GO !!!
Yea he's won game and lead them to a few SB's but the man has no logic,
no sense of reality, no clue. To draft Tommy Maddox instead of some
receivers, O-Linemen or D-Linemen was absolutly rediculous. Ralph
Rotten may not be far off with his 3-13 prediction if things remain as
they are. Without help or drastic improvement on the O-Line, Elway
won's see October.
On the bright side, there is some good your talent, and Pat Bolen
has yet to sign Reeves to a new deal. May he'll fire the $%^&%^&*
BG
|
36.1135 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine | Wed Sep 02 1992 18:19 | 10 |
| Hey Big 'N Lame, along with all of the other thangs you stated the
Donks are missing, you forgot one ithing,
NO QUARTERBACK!!!!!
Just a huge set of teef.
JaKe
|
36.1136 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Wed Sep 02 1992 19:40 | 18 |
| Jake Jake Jake, You know better than speaking BS in here;^
I'm kinda where you are Jack. Reeves has done a great job, but
can't get the job done when its do or die (if that makes sense)... I'm
not sure if they need to let him go, but just take alot of the
offensive responsabilities away.
3-13? Someone is mis-lead. I agree it could be a dismal year, but
define dismal? 8-8 would be dismal compared to what we/they are used
to. I think they stand as good a chance at winning the division as any
other AFC west team.
The OL will tell the tale. Yes this 1st game is crucial or so it
seems. It should be good.
The donks by 2.
Tim
|
36.1137 | It all rides on the opener... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:33 | 35 |
| I know most people aren't too excited about Denver's season after a
disappointing preseason, but the same thing happened year. They looked like
total $h!t in the final preseason game last year but they proceeded to
whip Cincinnati 45-14 the next week in the opener and go on to post a 12-4
record. Now I'm not saying that's what's gonna happen this year but my
point is how little preseason means. The Vikings went out and murdered
everyone in the preseason, but I'll bet ya they get beat by Green Bay this
weekend.
Yea, Denver has some serious problem areas (some due to injuries, some are
just plain weaknesses) and the schedule is harder, but if the defense can
stay fairly healthy and keep playing well they will be in every game. The
big variable will be the offense. I don't think the offense needs to suddenly
start hitting on all cylinders for this team to win alot, I think they just
need to hold their own and not give up alot of turnovers. The Houston game
last year is a good example: The defense actually played a pretty good game,
but the offense turned it over deep in their own territory a couple times and
when they weren't turning it over they would be 3 quick plays and out. The
special teams also had a few blunders in that game, which made the game a
blowout loss and not just a loss.
Anyway, given those 2 things (defense stays fairly healthy and offense holds
their own) I look for 9-11 wins out of this team.
I'm gonna throw on major asterisk on all this: the opener against the Raiders.
Not just because it's the Raiders, but the opener has set the tone for Denver
under Reeves. In Dan's 11 seasons in Denver has won the opener 7 times and
out of those 7 seasons their worst record was 9-7, and they have averaged nearly
11 wins per year in those 7 seasons. But in the 4 seasons where Denver has lost
the opener they only finished over .500 once and never made the playoffs in any
of those 4 seasons. Throw in the fact that it's a home game and you get the
point.
Joe
|
36.1138 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:04 | 3 |
| >> -< It all rides on the opener... >-
Tsskk tsskk tsskkk......pity.
|
36.1139 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 03 1992 16:22 | 13 |
| Once again I didn't follow pre-season much. I did watch the 1st half
of the Cowboy game. It was 7-zip Cowboys at the half which
included 2 no-brain ints thrown by Mr Ed. 2nd half was a
free for all. Then the seers of doom and gloom came out after
the Cards game. I didn't watch any of that but I did hear the
Broncos had 2 long drives of 60+ yds for TD's in the 1st
half again (I think). Then the Cards came back strong in 2nd half
to beat Broncos. So what? The defense should be solid if not one
of the top units in the NFL. As usuall Denver's defense will
be the key to a reasonable season.
BoB
|
36.1140 | Bottom line: A win for Denver, a loss for LA | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Sep 07 1992 19:00 | 43 |
| Broncos, 1-0; Faids, 0-1. HA! So much for Carlos' endless predictions!
It's a damm good thing this isn't college football where you not only need to
win but win impressively. In pro football, a win is a win no matter how ugly
or unimpressive. Let's just say that if this was college, Denver would've
dropped in the polls just like Penn State did even though the Nittany Lions
won.
At the end of the first half Raider fans were probably saying they should be
up about 24-0 the way they moved the ball up and down the field, yet Denver
fans could've easily made a similar argument because 2 Raider turnovers that
put Denver in great field position resulted in zero points for the Broncos.
The Denver offense was worse than most of us would've imagined. Midway thru
the 3rd quarter they had just 1 first down and 19 total yards. That's not a
misprint either. And they looked as bad as the statistics indicate. In the
first half, Freeman and the rest of the OL looked pathetic while Elway was
running for his life. And when John had time, he was usually off target.
I was quite disappointed with the defense, particularly against the run.
They did tighten up pretty good in the 2nd half, but there were still times
when the DL was just getting manhandled. But one thing the defense got in
this game which they haven't gotten in the previous 5 losses to LA is
turnovers. And that saved the defense in the first half.
As for Elway's final drive, well, why can't he do this the whole game. Anyone
who believed that this team could move 85 yards in less than 3 minutes without
any timeouts just wasn't being realistic with the way the offense had
performed up to that point. When John dodged a blitzing Terry McDaniel and
threw the key pass to Arthur Marshall, it was vintage Elway. And one has to
wonder how many other QB's would've been able to take the punishing and
constant hits Elway did and remain in the game, especially the big-time
cheapshot Moss delivered in the 3rd quarter. Anyone who says that's "Raider
football" is just embarrassing themselves - that's cheapshot football which
shouldn't be tolerated in this league and should've resulted in Moss' ejection.
Denver should be able to go to 2-0 with the Chargers and their quarterbacking
troubles coming to Mile High next week. No need to discuss what Denver needs
to improve on next week because it's so obvious - offense! - the OL in
particular. Hopefully Atwater will be back too.
Joe
|
36.1141 | | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Tue Sep 08 1992 10:28 | 9 |
|
Just win baby! :*)
Joe,
I don't think it was Moss who shoved Elway under the bench. It
was #99. I think he's a rook.
Claybone
|
36.1142 | | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Tue Sep 08 1992 13:17 | 4 |
|
Never mind Joe, it was indeed Moss.........
Claybone
|
36.1143 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Tue Sep 08 1992 16:43 | 1 |
| Anyone have an OL that they would like to trade?
|
36.1144 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Sep 08 1992 17:49 | 18 |
| >> -< Bottom line: A win for Denver, a loss for LA >-
Comments like this really hurt Joe.
>> So much for Carlos' endless predictions!
And the worst part about it is that they're not over yet, if the
Chargers 'D' plays like it did against the Chiefs, Bucky's in for
another beating. By the way, I didn't think that Winston Moss' love tap
was all that brutal. You see it all the time, whether it's a receiver
racing to the sidelines trying to get outta bounds and getting a little
extra help by the DB, or as in this case, Bucky running for his life
and getting a little shove by Moss on the way out of bounds....no
biggy, excepting that it happened to the Donks prima-donna QB. Hope he
didn't break a nail. :-)
Carlitos
|
36.1145 | All I can say is thank you Jay | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Tue Sep 08 1992 18:44 | 4 |
| Winston Moss is a washed up girlyman and thank you for pushing Biff
under the bench.
Payback is a bitch for Faider fans.
|
36.1146 | TO BE OR " NOT " | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Sep 09 1992 15:14 | 6 |
| All hat's off to Jay. Now he's a real QB " NOT ".
Thanks Jay this just what the Broncos needed to get them started.
Drewski
|
36.1147 | Go Broncos! | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 09 1992 15:35 | 16 |
| Just when I was begining to become a less vindictive Raider
hater, they show me and the rest of those that watched
why I hate them so. I have said it before and I'll say it
again. The Raiders have an attitude that they intimidate.
Maybe they do intimidate other teams but as far as the
Broncos go they NEVER have intimidated this team. Time and
time again they flag them with 15 yarders. Thank you. I
have always been amazed at the control Denver maintains
while they suck them into their own trap. I heard that
there was some quick action by the cops to contol fans
behind the Raiders when they slam dunked Elway into the
bench. The situation was ripe for a blowup. Fortunately
cooler heads prevailed. Elway's revenge was a beautiful
thing. The guy is unbelieveable.
BoB
|
36.1148 | Elway played to the level of competition | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Wed Sep 09 1992 19:16 | 8 |
| Jay was the Broncos MVP!
Moss' shove was uncalled for and he should have been fined;-)
Carlos, I told you it would have been a long drive for you to
watch your faiders lose!
Tim
|
36.1149 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 09 1992 22:40 | 22 |
| It was the Raiders. It was the home opener. It was still
hard to get overly excited about that game. Al's game plan
was simple. "You must get to the opposing team's QB and
you must get to him hard." Nice try Al but wrong game plan.
Speaking of QB's, Al has had that albatross Shroeder hanging
around his neck so long now he's begining to like him.
Marijunavich would have been duck soup though. Enough of
those idiots. Let's talk Broncos.
Offensively there's only one way for that bunch to go.
There's some new names and faces out there that want
to make their mark and did a fine job. Look for a steady
improvement throughout the season in the offense.
The defense had an impressive performance. Dennis Smith
looked like a 3rd year man in his prime. The boys were
putting some serious licks on the Raiders. Everyone
waited for them to collapse from fatigue and lengthy
playing time. They kept right in there slamming the
door on the running game late in the 4th forcing a
punt. That was the ball game right there.
BoB
|
36.1150 | Chargers vs Broncos | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Wed Sep 09 1992 23:05 | 16 |
|
Hey Bob...can they continue to slam the door on running backs like
Butts, Bernstine and Harmon this Sunday?
The way I see it is that the Broncos will figure the Chargers have no
passing game, so they will stack the D against the run and dare the
Chargers to pass. To win, the Chargers have to pass successfully.
Conversely, I see the Chargers D tough against the run, but never safe
against the pass and certainly not safe against Elway. If we can
fluster Elway or shut down the passing game, that'll go a long way for
a Charger win. We'll see....and I'll be there.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.1151 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 10 1992 00:07 | 10 |
| Well Glen you know I hate to overlook anyone. When I look
at the Chargers though, I expect them to come out of their
long semi-comatose state and blast the Broncos someday.
It just never seems to happen. I hope this sunday isn't that day.
All of the AFC West teams learned a long time ago that
defense begins with stopping the run. There always seems to
be a lot of good backs in that division.
BoB
|
36.1152 | ? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Sep 10 1992 15:43 | 24 |
| >> The defense had an impressive performance.
What !???, You must've been watching a different game than I was.
Anytime your team allows an opponent to run ~160 yards on you, BoB,
that is anything but an impressive performance......if it wouldna been
for Shredder, the Raiders woulda blew them completly outta the water.
Now if you wanna talk about impressive defensive performances, how does
allowing the doinks 19 TOTAL yards on offense during the first half
sound. Now that's impressive. Like I said in the Raider topic, the
reason the donks were able to slow down the Raiders running game in the
second half was due to a very weak game plan by offensive co-ordinator,
Terry Robiskie (him and Shredder deserve each other). It became very
obvious that every time the Raiders lined up in the I-formation they
were gonna run the ball, if they would have threw in a little play
action here and there, they would have caught Dennis Smith with his
pants down....he was coming up and stuffing the run every time they
lined up in the I. Robiskie & Shredder both gotta go, and the sooner
the better. The Chargers, with Arnspargers new defense, and a little
play action by Humphries, could walk outta mile-hi with a coke and a
smile.
HtH
Carlos
|
36.1153 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 10 1992 16:22 | 11 |
| Please Carlos. The only real defensive stat that has any real
meaning to me is points allowed. Don't forget the D scored
on you too and almost scored another time and came up with
turnovers stopping drives and on and on and on....
Also please take your Schroeder whinning over to Raider land
where your sure to get some sympathy. Always remember it
was a Donk, Mike Shannahan that wanted Burlein over
Schroeder to begin with and that's what got him fired.
Give me a break.
BoB
|
36.1154 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Sep 11 1992 16:15 | 9 |
| None of it matters now, as it's in the history books as a win for the
donks. And I wasn't out for your sympathy, but I was trying to set you
straight, that it wasn't so much the donks awesome defense that decided
this contest as it was shredder's ineptitude. If it wouldn't have been
for shredders many, and very conciderate gifts, the "only real
defensive stat that has any real meaning" would have likely been
similar to the yardage stats. etc etc.... HtH
Carlos
|
36.1155 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Running With The Devil (dog) | Fri Sep 11 1992 18:12 | 12 |
| Carlos, so then cain it be said that Denver's lack of O was due to
smElway's ineptitude and not the Faider(tm to cacti) D.
The CAAYOBI Club(tm) was totally disgusted with the Faids. The Donks
were pretty much like I figgered they'd be. I justed figgered the Faids
would be better. Guess not.
Geez, the way the Donks drove for the winning td makes me wonder if
this CAAYOBI Club(tm) stuff is worth it.
Childs, you there? Slap me please!
|
36.1156 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:13 | 16 |
|
7 dropped passes
7 dropped passes
7 dropped passes
o u c h
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.1157 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Mon Sep 14 1992 12:21 | 27 |
| Denver is off to a nice 2-0 start, but looking at the next 5 games on the
schedule a 2-0 start was a must, considering those 2 games were at home.
The offense was adequate yesterday, but still far from consistent, and the
running game continues to be nonexistent. Denver had a nice drive to open the
game, but they proceeded to disappear for the rest of the first half. After
that first drive, Denver's offense only netted 21 yards for the rest of the
half. They are trying to go deep and open things up quite often, although
not with a whole lot of success. I really liked how they went straight to the
end zone (to Sharpe) after Dimry's interception in the 3rd quarter.
The defense has only given up 13 points in each game, but you still don't feel
like they're playing that great. They came up with 5 sacks yesterday but
San Diego practically ran the ball at will. Last week against the defense
lived by the turnover, yesterday it was kind of like the bend-but-don't-break
theory. When San Diego got down there, the defense usually came up with
something: a blocked field goal, a big sack to take SD out of field goal
range, a goal-line stand to hold SD to a field goal, another stand to force a
field goal, and an interception late in the game.
You have to be satisfied if Denver can split these next 2 road games (at Phil.,
at Clev.) and be 3-1. Philly appears to be one of the league's top teams, and
it's always a dogfight (no pun intended!) at Cleveland. Looking ahead a bit,
6-2 at the break would be great.
Joe
|
36.1158 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 14 1992 14:32 | 17 |
| Elway is going to have a long day next sunday! I say start him in
the shotgun on 1st down situations. Don't line up in the I and run the
ball up the middle. Gee for some reason that was just SO obvious
yesterday!
Start using Reggie Rivers more! Even Greg Lewis wouldn't hurt. Yes
he fumbles, but when you are in for 3 and punt every series, well not
much else will hurt IMO.
Elway just overthrough a few. 1 to Mark Jackson that I remember. He
was standing wide open, and Elway tossed the ball into the 3rd level.
I think the Charger are going to be better than people think. Of
course I have been saying that for some time, soooooooo......????
Tim
|
36.1159 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Mon Sep 14 1992 15:34 | 14 |
|
> Elway just overthrough a few. 1 to Mark Jackson that I remember. He
> was standing wide open, and Elway tossed the ball into the 3rd level.
I remember that play and it was severely overthrown, but they were saying
how one of the Charger DB's was kind of laying back just waiting for Elway
to throw that pass so he could make the pick. Now whether Elway actually
threw it away because of that or it just got away from him I don't know.
If the defense doesn't play a good game this week they'll probably get blown
out. And if the offense does manage to put up some points, I'm sure they'll
look ugly doing it.
Joe
|
36.1160 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 14 1992 16:23 | 5 |
| The defense would look better than they have if the offense would
stay on the field more than 3 plays and with them playing one of the
best defenses, that will be unlikely.
Tim
|
36.1161 | 2-0 | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Mon Sep 14 1992 18:44 | 15 |
| A good start and consistent improvement the first drive was a thang of beaUty
80yds 8 plays 5:00 minutes. Turn of the T.V go outside and enjoy the weather
this game was a wrap.
I noticed that S.D did score a couple of times but no worry I'm sure Denver
played like Dallas built up a early lead then just played consistent enough to
take the enchilada's home for supper.
You'd think the Bronco's were in the cellar ala Faiders or Giants the way
everybody is so down and out about the offense. Face it the only things the
Chargers and Raiders cain do is run the ball up the middle for 2 plays and if
it's 3rd and more than 4yrds pray that a less than average QB can complete a
pass to a less than average WR.
Jeff
|
36.1162 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 14 1992 19:54 | 6 |
| re-1 Thats the most I have seen you type in 2 years...It musta been
that water downed tap beer at Cleats friday;^)
keep it up!
Tim
|
36.1163 | | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Tue Sep 15 1992 10:20 | 4 |
|
You tell 'em Tim. Go git back in your hole Riggo! :*)
Claybone
|
36.1164 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:07 | 14 |
| And when Riggen *does* reply in here it's pretty much a worthless note.
:^)
The paper ran a front-page story today about how the Eagles have
had 11 quarterback 'kills' (QB's knocked out of games) in their last 28
games, including 7 in the last 9 games of the 1990 regular season.
Better run alot of rollouts, John.
And FWIW (probably nothing) the visiting team has won the last 3
meeting between these 2 teams.
Joe
|
36.1165 | Clyde, Reggie, Jerome, and Mike | SHALOT::HUNT | No, Daddy, I glued them on the fish! | Wed Sep 16 1992 13:43 | 17 |
| � The paper ran a front-page story today about how the Eagles have
� had 11 quarterback 'kills' (QB's knocked out of games) in their last 28
� games, including 7 in the last 9 games of the 1990 regular season.
Let's see if I can rack these up ...
Timm Rosenbach 1992
Troy Aikman 1990
Stan Humphries 1990
Jeff Rutledge 1990
Vinny Testaverde 1991
Jeff Hostetler 1991
Bubby Brister 1991
That's all I can remember at this point.
Bob Hunt
|
36.1166 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:13 | 27 |
|
Bob, the complete list of their QB knockouts follows the form feed.
There were a few differences from who you had in '91 - I don't know who's right.
1990:
Steve Grogan
Jeff Rutledge
Stan Humphries
Chris Miller
Phil Simms
Anthony Dilweg
Troy Aikman
1991:
Testaverde
Bobby Hebert
Boomer Esiason
1992:
Rosenbach
|
36.1167 | Check | SHALOT::HUNT | No, Daddy, I glued them on the fish! | Wed Sep 16 1992 14:46 | 4 |
| That sounds about right. I try to do these things from the ol' brain
cells and sometimes they're in the game and sometimes they ain't.
Bob Hunt
|
36.1168 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 17 1992 16:19 | 8 |
| The Eagles might 'kill' a lot of qb's but last year
they had a couple of their own killed also. This feels
like a very shakey 2-0. Win or loose, this is a game that
answers a lot of questions for me at least. If they
can keep hanging in there with minimum injury untill the
walking wounded can return, they should do just fine.
BoB
|
36.1169 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Thu Sep 17 1992 18:48 | 11 |
| I have a friend in the Phila. area who is a big Broncos fan (he watches
them every week at my house on my satellite dish). He's interested in
greeting the team when they land in Philly on Friday or Saturday to
show his support, but when he called the Broncos for the info, they
told him that they would not disclose their arrival time for "security
reasons". My question is 2 part:
1. When will they be landing in Philadelphia?
2. Do other teams do this too?
Dennis Faust
|
36.1170 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Thu Sep 17 1992 19:52 | 5 |
| All I've heard is that they're leaving Saturday. I think alot of teams
have their charter stop away from the main terminal and the players
just get directly on a bus and head for the hotel.
Joe
|
36.1171 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:29 | 21 |
| Most teams do not go through airport gates unless they're clearing
customs or unless there's a local law requiring them to do so.
Generally, a football road trip goes like this:
Bus from the stadium to the airport where the bus brings the team right
to the plane. Some people not taking the bus will go to the terminal
and be brought out to the plane by the airline folks. Plane leaves and
flies to the other city. Plane lands and is met by the buses. Bus
takes the team right to the hotel. Meetings, dinner, meetings and
beddy-bye. Get up in the morning. Have breakfast. Buses to the
stadium. Play the game. Leave the stadium. Bus back to the airport
and go right to the plane again. Fly home. Buses meet team at plane.
A football trip is designed to go as much like clockwork as possible
with distractions from fans minimized as much as possible. Coaches
want the players thinking about the game without worrying about travel
hassles. The best bet for your friend is to attempt to meet the team
at the hotel and not at the airport.
John
|
36.1172 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Intro to Employee Interest Noting 101 | Fri Sep 18 1992 09:32 | 9 |
| Set mode=Sam_Kinnison
Wouldn't want da pooor liddle boys to get distracted by some silly FAN
OF THEIRS NOW, WOULD WE!!!!!!
JaKe
|
36.1173 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:02 | 47 |
| Jake, it's not just distractions from fans, it's distractions from
anything. It's drummed into these guys from the time they start taking
overnight trips (in some states it's high school, in most cases it
doesn't start happening until college) that these are business trips.
They aren't travelling to party or have a good time, they are
travelling to do a job. It's a job that they only have one chance to
do and do well, and the cost of not doing that job can be high. The
focus and intensity needed to do that job is incredibly high, and
coaches don't want anything to distract from it.
That's why there's such a focus on making the travel go smoothly. That
was my job for a brief period during my internship with the team 15
years ago. It's a lot of pressure. The buses better damn well be
where they're supposed to be when they're supposed to be there. The
plane better be ready. The room keys better be ready for handing out
at the hotel. Everybody better know where the meeting rooms and dining
rooms are. Police escorts are provided to and from the stadium. The
phones are shut off in the hotel rooms after a certain hour. All of it
is designed to allow the players to focus in on their jobs.
My situation is a bit unique in that I've seen it from both sides, both
as a fan and from a team. To a fan, it's a big deal to see their
favorite athlete up close and say hello. If it was only one fan, it
wouldn't be a big deal. Multiply it by many fans, and it becomes a
pain. One of the things that's made it worse, especially for baseball
players, is autograph seekers. I have friends who've played pro sports
but any socializing I've ever done with them has been in the offseason
and not when they've been on a road trip. I stay out of the way.
With Coach MacPherson, I would go to the game at BC when Syracuse would
come down. I'd visit with him at the practice on Friday before the
game and in his hotel suite the night before the game - but only
because I was invited. If I ever sensed that I was being a pain or
distracting him from what he needed to get done, I wouldn't have done
it and I just would have said hello to him after the game. I think it
was a sign of the strength of our friendship that I was invited to any
team function - meetings, dinner, post-game locker room - and I was
thrilled and happy that he'd think that much of me to allow me to do
so. I like to think that having old friends around helped him relax
before a game. About all I do now that he works for the Patriots is
say hello to him after games - win or lose.
I'm not saying the insulation of a team from people is right but I
understand why it's done and there are some very legitimate reasons for
doing so.
John
|
36.1174 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Fri Sep 18 1992 10:38 | 4 |
| Thanks for the info, John.
Dennis Faust
|
36.1175 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Sep 18 1992 15:51 | 17 |
| UGLY,UGLY,UGLY...
Thats all I have to say about the Donks and their 2-0 start. Elway
had better bring the oxygen with him cause the poor SOB is gonna be
running for his life. Look for this game to be a major blow out.
I'm not say ing will necessarily be the Donks that are on the losing
end of this one either. I can see the Begal's looking past the
happless 2-0 Donks to their next game. After all, lets face it, the
NFC is never to terribly frightened of the AFC ball clubs they face.
The Begals have a massive, quick, tanented, and experienced "D"
the should total dominate the Broncos flock of rookies and no talent
bozo on the O-line. But, The Donks have Mr. Ed and we all know
by now that anything is possible when Buckey in town...
Go Donks !!
BG
|
36.1176 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | W I N D- it passes and breaks | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:07 | 9 |
| >>UGLY,UGLY,UGLY...
That's funny, Big'N'Lame, cause that's all the rest of the workd cain
say about Big Teef Mr. Ed!!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
36.1177 | They put the ughh in ugly! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Fri Sep 18 1992 16:58 | 7 |
| >> UGLY, UGLY, UGLY!
I'm forced, big_shame, the donks are the ugliest 2-0 team around,
while on the other hand, my beloved Raiders happen to be the prettiest
0-2 team around....of course Hal might disagree.
Carlos
|
36.1178 | FAIDERS PLAY UGLY! | BSS::BSORENSON | The Battler | Fri Sep 18 1992 18:11 | 7 |
|
Speaking of UGLY! Carlos, did you hear that Faider Winston Moss
finally was fined for pushing Elway under the metal bench in week 1?
Yep, $2500 for his flagrant foul. Now that proves it was UGLY!
Therefore, the Faiders play UGLY!
B_Bob
|
36.1179 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-2! | Fri Sep 18 1992 18:14 | 4 |
| Much rather be an ugly 2-0 than a pretty 0-2.
Joe
|
36.1180 | "Ouch, ya almost hurt my wrist, ya big brut!" | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Sat Sep 19 1992 11:46 | 14 |
| �Speaking of UGLY! Carlos, did you hear that Faider Winston Moss
�finally was fined for pushing Elway under the metal bench in week 1?
Like I said before, if this woulda happened to anybody else other than
the donks prima-donna, Bucky, it would've been a non-issue. Did anybody
notice in lasted weeks Monday nighter, that a almost identical
situation took place, excepting it was either a receiver a RB that got
the shove a couple of yards outta bounds.....think they'll give that
defender a $2500 slap on the hand.....no way!
Carlos
PS I hope Bucky's manicurist was able to repair the broken finger nail
he might have gotten in that vicious tap by that big brut, Moss.
|
36.1181 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 02:01 | 5 |
| When you started the "UGLY" thread did you have a premonition of the
outcome of Sunday's game against the Eagle??
HtH (tm to Kev)
The Crazy Met
|
36.1182 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 21 1992 09:55 | 13 |
|
> Like I said before, if this woulda happened to anybody else other than
> the donks prima-donna, Bucky, it would've been a non-issue.
Nonsense. I finally saw the play in question and it was the blatantest
of blatant cheapshots. Usually a play like that on an opponents' QB
results in a full-scale brawl. If anything, the Broncos wimped out by
not sticking up for Elway by pummelling the offender and initiating such
a brawl...
glenn
|
36.1183 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Mon Sep 21 1992 09:58 | 5 |
| TCM -
HTH (standing for Hope this helps) is TM'd by Spud and me..
JD
|
36.1184 | Shoulda mailed it in! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 21 1992 10:00 | 1 |
| Was there a game against the Eagles this weekend?
|
36.1185 | At least the AFC Central helped out | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:03 | 28 |
| Well, the good news of the day was that everyone else in the division lost
(except Seattle, and who cares about them) and Elway didn't get hurt. You
know it's bad when the punter is selected as the offensive MVP. Or when you
only manage 82 yards of total offense, 3rd worst in team history. Ouch!
As bad as Denver was, you gotta give the Eagle defense alot of credit. It
seemed like Philly had about 14 guys out there all afternoon. Absolutely
*nothing* worked for Denver. The play of the day for Denver came on special
teams when Arthur Marshall had a long punt return only to be stopped by
Philly's punter. The Eagles nearly doubled Denver in time of possession.
Denver was 0 for 11 on 3rd downs yesterday, putting them at 3 for 32 on the
season, far and away the worst in the league. And that's no coincidence,
either. The offense really is that bad at this point. They flashed a graphic
on the screen yesterday that Denver was next-to-last in the league in first
downs, and with yesterday's grand total of 4 they're undoubtedly in dead last
now.
The worst part of this loss is that Denver was just plain whipped. It's not
like Denver gave up a bunch of turnovers and/or some special teams touchdowns,
they were just plain beaten soundly. I kind of thought they might have a game
like this against Philly. They're still in good shape in the division but
need a road win next week in what will be one of their easier road games of the
season. Unless they find an offense, *some* offense, it's not gonna be easy
though.
Joe
|
36.1186 | Mr. Lucky | CNTROL::CHILDS | Click, Bang. Your daddy just shot po' me.. | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:08 | 4 |
|
It's game like these that prove John Elway has no business in the Hall of Fame...
mike
|
36.1187 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:20 | 3 |
| Last time I checked, he wasn't in the Hall of Fame.
Joe
|
36.1188 | ....ice predicts... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:51 | 14 |
|
As I gaze into the crystal iceBALL, what do I see for this coming
sunday in the dawgs-donks clash...
PREDICTION: The Browns will win the game outright...
Unless...
... the donks score more points.
Nice predicition, huh?
|
36.1189 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Sep 21 1992 11:56 | 6 |
| JD
I prefer Kev's interpretation of HtH.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1190 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Huh? | Mon Sep 21 1992 13:44 | 1 |
| So anyone else wanna join the CAAYOBI CLUB(tm)?
|
36.1191 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Sep 22 1992 15:26 | 5 |
| It was an obvious case of overcoaching. Here it is only the
3rd week of the season and Reeves already has them playing
in super bowl form. What next?
BoB
|
36.1192 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Sep 22 1992 15:33 | 2 |
| Where's Big Game been?
Denny
|
36.1193 | BIG'N'LAMEwatch Day 2?????? | PFSVAX::JACOB | U S 1992 Rodeo Sex Champion | Tue Sep 22 1992 15:42 | 7 |
|
JaKe
|
36.1194 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Sep 22 1992 17:47 | 5 |
| So....how'd Bucky do this weekend? heh heh heh........
HtH
Carlos
|
36.1195 | 30-0 didn't reflect how close the score really was | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Tue Sep 22 1992 19:12 | 5 |
| Seems to me that Dan Reeves has the entire NFL fooled into thinking the
Broncos are a cake walk for the rest of season.
Jeff
|
36.1196 | Danny boy must go... | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Sep 23 1992 17:17 | 12 |
| Me thinks the Broncos needs a New coach and offensive cordinator.
Danny Boy has been great for the Broncos but he's had 3 trys at
the SB and Failed. I say Give someone else a try. Besides that he's
wasting Bronco draft choices. Look at what karl pickens is doing with
the bengals and Danny boy picks a QB won't be ready for x years leaving
what some might call one of the greatest QB's in the game unprotected.
That tells you how much Elway and Dan like each other. Bottom line
Danny boy must go.....
Drewski
|
36.1197 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 24 1992 00:37 | 9 |
| Yeah but Drewski, that 3 strikes your out stuff is a
different game. Don't get me wrong. I'm not here to
defend Reeves but give the guy credit where he is due.
Granted, he blew this year's 1st pick. He's blown other
picks too but he also has pulled some real deals out of
nowhere. Pickens' value as a receiver is taken away if
the QB doesn't have the blocking to set up and throw with.
BoB
|
36.1198 | Big'N'Lame watch Day 4 | PFSVAX::JACOB | Martin's half the man Jimmy C. is | Thu Sep 24 1992 09:26 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
36.1199 | Cacti wants REeves outta there! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Thu Sep 24 1992 09:39 | 15 |
| I'm starting to agree again, Reeves needs to be waived! Like stated
before, anyone want to trade an OL for Collie?
The offensive coordinator has an easy job. He designs plays that
reeves throws away! If you haven't noticed, the Broncos use the same
plays year in and year out! The only new thing I have seen the last 10
years is the slant pattern that they were using in pre-season, and 2-3
times during this regular season.
Should be an intersting game this weekend....
Carlos, the faids still looking for a QB? 0-3 is the best start
that I've seen for the faids in years! Its a race for cellar dwellers!
Tim
|
36.1200 | HELP WANTED: NEW COACH NEEDED | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Sep 24 1992 12:29 | 10 |
|
Bob don't get me wrong Danny boy is a great coach. I just
think its time he moves on. I mean with the Broncos he's too
predictable on offense. I mean which team in the NFL Denver
plays don't look for the QB Draw, Shuttle pass, and the Delay
Draw to the running back. That's basically been Denvers offense
since Elway came into the NFL.
Drewski
|
36.1201 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Sep 25 1992 20:14 | 7 |
| Today's Rocky had an interesting article by Bob Kravitz.
He was writing about the 4 released free agents. Reeves'
opinion on the matter is "I don't think they can help us.
That's basically it." Dan appears to be loosing his grip
on reallity.
BoB
|
36.1202 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Sat Sep 26 1992 13:27 | 1 |
| I'll take Keith Jackson any day!
|
36.1203 | Even the Pats had 2 | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Sep 28 1992 09:17 | 2 |
| Donks score 0 TDs last 2 games!
Denny
|
36.1204 | Faids 0-4 after tonight??? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 28 1992 10:27 | 16 |
| Its sad, but at least they moved the ball on offense this week. Now
they are back to the usual Red Zone problem of not scoring TDs.
Another win though!
3-1. It will be 4-3 after the next 3 games unless they do better on
offense.
Defense seemed to bend but not break. They better not bend against
the skins and bills!
Yesterday musta been the day of DROPPED BALLS!!! For alot of teams,
specially Jakes team!
Tim
|
36.1205 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Faiders are 0-3! | Mon Sep 28 1992 12:08 | 27 |
| > -< Faids 0-4 after tonight??? >-
Without a doubt. I'll admit right now though that I'll be pulling for 'em
to beat Luckalo in a couple weeks.
> Its sad, but at least they moved the ball on offense this week. Now
> they are back to the usual Red Zone problem of not scoring TDs.
Exactly - hey, one step at a time for this offense! If they could've at least
stuck a couple of those in the end zone we're looking at 20-0 and everyone's
happy. On Denver's last scoring drive they pretty much sensed that a FG would
be nearly as clinching as a touchdown and were playing it safe. The last thing
they needed to do was to let the Browns get a cheap and fast 6 points and
suddenly it's a whole new ballgame. Speaking of that last drive, it was huge.
When they started down at the 3 I was thinking that just a first down would be
great. The long run by Rivers may have been the most crucial play of this game.
And speaking of Rivers, I think he should move into the starting lineup ahead
of Gaston. Rivers is better at creating of finding a hole, and that's the type
of back they need right now.
It may have been ugly, it may have been against a team down to their 3rd QB, but
it was still a big win because it was a road win. I also think it was a must
win, because if you look at Denver's remaining road game not many of them appear
to be probable wins.
Joe
|
36.1206 | Donks are hurting in administration | FRETZ::HEISER | tragically cool | Mon Sep 28 1992 13:43 | 25 |
| Pat Bowlen on Keith Jackson: "He's a good pass-catching tight end, but
that's all he is. He's not a blocker. He's just a big, good tight end
who can catch."
Our local paper had an interesting tidbit yesterday about an aired
confrontation involving the Donks GM John Beake and former NFL
receiver Dave Logan (radio host of the show).
Beake: We have no interest (in Jackson) because he can't fit into our
system.
Logan: That speaks poorly of the Broncos' offensive system.
Beake: I'll tell you what I'd say about our system, we've been to 3
Super Bowls in 6 years.
Logan: John, that's fine. But I'd say this about your system...
Beake: That's the end of the conversation.
Logan: No, that's not going to be the end of the conversation.
Beake: Well, it is tonight.
Logan: Then I'm going to continue the conversation, because if you are
going to talk about a tight end with the skills of Keith Jackson,
and he can't fit in the system, your system stinks.
Beake: Dave, you can say that on your own show. You don't say that on
my show.
Logan: I'm the host of the show. I'll say whatever I want to.
Beake: Then, you are going to have the whole show to yourself. (Beake
then took his headset off and left the show).
|
36.1207 | worst 3-1 team I've ever seen... | CNTROL::CHILDS | George Bush, mental wimp | Mon Sep 28 1992 14:54 | 7 |
|
Has anyone asked Elway how he feels about Jackson???
probably have and he nixed cause he doesn't want to loose his star
power........
mike
|
36.1208 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Sep 28 1992 18:03 | 27 |
| I like Keith, and Beake is full of it! At least Jackson can catch
the ball, as opposed to Kay. Kay catches about 50% of what is thrown
his way.
I watched quite a few games when Jackson was at Oklahoma, and in
that option attack, he was great at blocking and he lead the team in
receptions if I remember correctly.
He could be on my team and I'm sure Elway would like it!
They do need an OLG & OLT 1st!!! The right side of the OL is ok at
best, but the left is worse. Center is solid IMO. I also think that
Jeff Davidson sucks! Put in DAve Widell. He ain't great, but is
better.
I agree about Rivers, but I have said that since game 1 or 2. Even
that Victor Jones was giving what seemed to me more effort than Green.
I was happy to see Greg Lewis get another chance and he came through
by NOT fumbling.
1 Big name DL would be a big plus. Denvers pass rush is still
lacking. I thought Croel would be doing more.
Any injury report?
Tim
|
36.1209 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 28 1992 18:09 | 6 |
|
That's one hell of a radio show! You gotta like a guy who confronts a
team management type instead of the usual kow-towing...
glenn
|
36.1210 | Dave Logan Vs John Beake Round 2 this Thursday night | OURGNG::RIGGEN | T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway... | Mon Sep 28 1992 19:00 | 5 |
| Yes the same Dave Logan from the Cleveland Browns. He's a CU graduate and
a very talented color person in the booth. Wouldn't be the least bit suprised
to see him on T.V. color for ESPN, TNT, NBC.
|
36.1211 | | FRETZ::HEISER | tragically cool | Mon Sep 28 1992 20:39 | 3 |
| > -< Dave Logan Vs John Beake Round 2 this Thursday night >-
Will Beake spread his wings again or show up this time?
|
36.1212 | that's not punny, er I mean funny | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Tue Sep 29 1992 10:11 | 4 |
|
Ole Dave Logan sure is pecking away at Beake eh?
Claybone
|
36.1213 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Lose, Baby | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:19 | 31 |
|
> Our local paper had an interesting tidbit yesterday about an aired
> confrontation involving the Donks GM John Beake and former NFL
> receiver Dave Logan (radio host of the show).
I wasn't listening to the show that night because I was watching Thursday night
college football, but they played that particular segment of the show on the
local news later on and it was hilarious. Logan isn't afraid to confront
anyone or tell them how he feels. Last year Logan was pissed at Reeves about
something and he told about it face to face. As for Beake, he's somewhat of a
hothead. A couple weeks ago he was extremely pissed off because the Rockies'
schedule came out and they are scheduled to be home 3 of the 4 Sundays next
September. When they interviewed Beake about the schedule he was practically
yelling at the reporters saying how the Broncos have the first right to Mile
High and he doesn't know what the hell the Rockies think they're trying to pull
off here.
There really was no issure here. First of all, it's not really an
issue until the Bronco schedule comes out next Spring. If there's a conflict,
then the Rockies and MLB need to work around it, but until the NFL schedule
comes out, there's no conflict. Beake was way out of line getting as upset as
he did.
I also think Logan is a very good color analyst and am kind of surprised one of
the networks haven't picked him up. In addition to the talk show, he does
color for the Broncos on the radio, color for CU games when a local station
picks up their games, the Bill McCartney show, and the Big 8 Gridiron report
on Prime with Drew Goodman.
Joe
|
36.1214 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:21 | 5 |
| The NFL schedule generally works around the baseball schedule. Look
for the Broncos to have 1 home Sunday game in September and either an
open date or a Monday night game.
John
|
36.1215 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Lose, Baby | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:31 | 17 |
| > The NFL schedule generally works around the baseball schedule. Look
> for the Broncos to have 1 home Sunday game in September and either an
> open date or a Monday night game.
They probably will but don't *have* to in this case. Like you said, a Monday
night home game in September is the most likely scenario, but I would
think playing 3 of the first 4 on the road is also a possibility.
RE: Injury report
Fletcher has a sprained left ankle and is listed as doubtful for the KC game.
Kay, Brooks, and Atwater are banged up but should play.
Also, Vance will be taken off IR and is expected to play Sunday. There's also
a good chance that Sammie Smith will be activated.
Joe
|
36.1216 | | CAMONE::WAY | And monkies might fly outta my butt | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:46 | 11 |
| Saw some old films of Mike(?) Garrett, the Chiefs RB in the mid-sixties,
in the old AFL.
Some of the footage was agains the Broncos. They didn't seem to have
the familiar D/horse logo on their helmets, but I couldn't figure out
what it was.
I though they always had the Blue helmet with D and horse.....
'Saw
|
36.1217 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Sep 29 1992 12:51 | 10 |
| You can count me as another Dave Logan fan. Not only is he a great color
analyst and a person who is not afraid to honestly express his feelings
on any sports topic but he also has a great sense of humor and can handle
call-ins and audience questions with the skill of a "Larry King".
With his skills, he deserves to be on national TV but I like him so much,
I hope he stays here. I especially like the radio talk show with Bill
McCartney. Logan and Mac have more than once left me rollin on the floor
with laughter.
Keith
|
36.1218 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Lose, Baby | Tue Sep 29 1992 13:16 | 9 |
|
> Some of the footage was agains the Broncos. They didn't seem to have
> the familiar D/horse logo on their helmets, but I couldn't figure out
> what it was.
I think they used to have a weird looking bucking bronco on their
helmet. And of course there's the infamous striped socks.
Joe
|
36.1219 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Tue Sep 29 1992 13:32 | 16 |
| 3 out of 4 on the road in September is certainly a possibility and I
didn't mean to discount it. It's just that if they want to have two
home games in September, one would end up being on a Monday night.
The NFL by the nature of its scheduling system where the opponents
aren't decided until after the season is at the mercy of the baseball
schedule because baseball is scheduled first. One of the parameters in
the NFL schedule is the availability of the facilities where the park
is shared with a baseball team - Joe Robbie Stadium (starting in 1993),
the entire AFC Central (although Cleveland will have a new baseball
park in 1994), San Diego, Seattle, Denver, Philadelphia, San Francisco
(through this year anyway), Anaheim, Minneapolis and Milwaukee (though
the Pack usually can work around the availability of County Stadium
fairly easily).
John
|
36.1220 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:10 | 9 |
| RE-Logo
Isn't there a logo note in this conference that has the info
your lookin' for?
Tim
ps, didn't the 49'rs start this season 3 out of 4 on the road?
|
36.1221 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Tue Sep 29 1992 19:46 | 10 |
| If you want to see what the old Bronco helmet looked like, call the Pro
Football HoF and have them send you a gift catalog. They sell them
there. BTW- it ought ot be called the NFL HoF- they refuse to
acknowledge the WFL or USFL in that place, as well as not much on the
CFL. I was totally taken aback by Larry Csonka's plaque- when they
listed his career, the WFL years were not accounted for in any way. It
was like he went into the Army for two years and didn't do anything.
Dennis Faust
|
36.1222 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Sep 30 1992 09:21 | 5 |
| I'm not even sure if the AAFC (the league from which the Browns and
Niners came) is acknowledged in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Check
Otto Graham's or Paul Brown's plaque to be sure.
John
|
36.1223 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Sep 30 1992 09:23 | 2 |
| I'll check nexted month John. I'll be there!
Denny
|
36.1224 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Oct 01 1992 23:44 | 16 |
| It's a very strange season so far but no matter how you cut
it a shakey 3-1 is much better than a shakey 0-4 or anything
in between. KC seems to be a hard luck story at Denver.
It's been something like 6 years since they have won here
and of course the Schotenheimer curse is still on.
Denver just might beat those guys for undisputed 1st place.
The Broncos know Kreig and they know the their big backs.
The Chiefs secondary usually has a good day against Mr Ed
but ol' bucky generally has the last hee-haw. It was refreshing
to see Denver able to run again at least for some success.
Granted it was against a tired looking Browns team but at this
point you take the positive where you find it.
Regardless of the w/l, this will be a good hitting tune up
for the Skins on MNF.
BoB
|
36.1225 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Lose, Baby | Fri Oct 02 1992 10:48 | 7 |
| KC hasn't won in Denver since 1982.
Denver released Nattiel and Perryman a couple days ago and resigned DB
Frank Robinson and brought Vance off IR.
Joe
|
36.1226 | The Vance will help!! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Fri Oct 02 1992 13:13 | 10 |
| Go Denver! I agree with what Bob said a couple back. If Denver can
slow the KC runners down, then they will most likely win. Craig is
known to choke when forced to throw under pressure!
I'm outta here for weeks! Field trip to Sequel.
I hope Atwater plays, as well as Brooks. Simon isn't if I heard
right. All impact players!
Tim
|
36.1227 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Je voudrais boire quelque chose. | Fri Oct 02 1992 13:19 | 6 |
| At the Jints/JEsts preseason game, Slasher told me that the Broncos will
win the AFC this year. And Slasher is never wrong.
So rest easy Bronco fans. It is in the bag.
JD
|
36.1228 | Big Bad John!!! | GENRAL::WADE | Wisdom Toofless! | Mon Oct 05 1992 09:21 | 1 |
|
|
36.1229 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 05 1992 10:25 | 6 |
|
UN...
BEE...
LEEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
36.1230 | YES! | COMET::FARMERA | | Mon Oct 05 1992 10:53 | 2 |
| Thank ya "M.A.M."!!!!
M.A.M. (Mile High Miracle).
|
36.1231 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 11:40 | 7 |
| Ok it was 19-6 and Broncs won 20-19. When did they get the two TD's?
KC has now loast 12 straight at Mile High. They must feel like FS when
they play Miami.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1232 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 05 1992 11:46 | 49 |
| You gotta be kiddin' me. To quote Dave Logan, the color commentator on the
radio, "If I wasn't sitting here watching this, I wouldn't believe it!" When
Denver was down 19-6 (having already been spared from sure defeat by holding
the Chiefs to a field goal on KC's previous possession), everything had to go
right for Denver from that point on. Things went so right that the Chiefs
had time to drive to midfield after Denver took the lead but ran out of downs
instead of time. Schottenheimer's gotta be wondering if he'll ever win a game
in Denver.
There's a lot of gushing over Elway and another comeback, but there were quite
a few factors involved in this one. Sure, he threw 2 perfect TD passes on
corner routes, one of which came on 3rd and 15, but Schottenheimer's strange
decisions down the stretch, a big play on a kickoff, a defensive stand, and a
great punt return by Arthur Marshall were all very crucial in pulling this one
out.
Schottenheimer made 3 big mistakes down the stretch:
1. After KC recovered an Elway fumble at about the Denver 10 with about 6
minutes left, the game was KC's to lose at that point. Sure, a TD would've
definitely sealed it for KC, but the most important thing they should've been
concerned with was running the clock or making Denver use their timouts. But
instead Schottenheimer opted for passes on 2nd and 3rd down, they both went
incomplete and stopped the clock.
2. KC leads 19-6 with 5 minutes left. Denver's at their own 20 and needs
2 touchdowns. The Chiefs play a soft defense, pretty much saying "we'll give
you all the underneath stuff but you're gonna use alot of time." The problem
is they didn't make Denver use quite enough time nor did they force the Broncos
to use any timeouts. If the Chiefs wouldn't have gotten so conservative and
stayed in their regular defense chances are Denver would not have moved 80
yards so easily. Hell, we're talking about a Bronco offense that hadn't scored
a TD in 11 quarters.
3. After Denver closed to within 19-13 and forced the Chiefs to punt from their
own end zone, why didn't Schottenheimer order his punter to step out of the end
zone? Denver still would've needed a TD to win, and KC would've gained close
to 30 yards, assuming the returns are equal. See, KC punted from their own 6
if I recall but the punter stands about 15 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
So a free kick from the 20 is like punting from the 35-yard line.
As for the first 55 minutes, Denver's offense is starting to show some
consistency despite not getting into the end zone. I'm becoming more impressed
with Rivers and less impressed with Green. The defense held the KC running
somewhat in check, but there wasn't nearly enough pressure on Krieg. If you
give a mediocre QB like Krieg or Schroeder time they're gonna look great.
Joe
|
36.1233 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 11:52 | 4 |
| Broncos - the ugliest 4-1 team in a LONG time.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1234 | uh, right :-) | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 11:53 | 7 |
| > To quote Dave Logan, the color commentator on the radio
^^^^^ ^^^^^
Is there some new technology that I missed???
The Crazy Met
|
36.1235 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:27 | 12 |
| > Broncos - the ugliest 4-1 team in a LONG time.
You're forgetting about Minnesota.
What's so ugly about 'em anyway? They had a hell of a comeback yesterday
without any help from turnovers. Of course, there was Schottenheimer...
Joe
|
36.1236 | Before yesterday, | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:35 | 6 |
| Lets see the last time Denver scored a TD was ????
I would rather have an ugly team an win then look great and lose.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1237 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:51 | 1 |
| Can you say: Lucky Bucky, Lucky Bucky, Lucky Bucky..etc...
|
36.1238 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:09 | 2 |
| Sounds like the famed 'prevent defense' did in another team eh?
Denny
|
36.1239 | No Zone? | COMET::FARMERA | | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:21 | 7 |
| Didnt the Chiefs go to a man to man in the end instead of a
zone-prevent?
Just curious
Drew
|
36.1240 | yep, you're right | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:30 | 17 |
|
> <<< Note 36.1239 by COMET::FARMERA >>>
> -< No Zone? >-
>
> Didnt the Chiefs go to a man to man in the end instead of a
> zone-prevent?
>
> Just curious
>
> Drew
That's what John said on the radio this morning. Before the pass to Jackson
John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.
Same with Vance. The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
from "The John"! Maybe you had to be there......
Kevin
|
36.1241 | wonder Cacti will rear up.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket? | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:32 | 10 |
|
> That's what John said on the radio this morning. Before the pass to Jackson
> John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.
> Same with Vance. The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
> from "The John"! Maybe you had to be there......
Not really I can hurl just as easily reading it now.....
mike
|
36.1242 | Hidden meaning? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Oct 05 1992 13:54 | 17 |
| <<< Note 36.1241 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket?" >>>
-< wonder Cacti will rear up.... >-
>> That's what John said on the radio this morning. Before the pass to Jackson
>> John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.
>> Same with Vance. The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
>> from "The John"! Maybe you had to be there......
> Not really I can hurl just as easily reading it now.....
>
> mike
Mike, it was a joke. A pass from "The John"! (men's room I'm assuming)!
Kevin
|
36.1243 | An equal and opposite reaction. | COMET::FARMERA | | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:14 | 7 |
| Any info on Tyron Braxton's health status? I believe he was the
one who got wolloped by a chiefs receiver. They said they were looking
at his jaw but there were no follow up reports on how he was.
Thanks
Drew
|
36.1244 | Noone can get that lucky..... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cowboys sip...... | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:54 | 3 |
|
John Elway is the Anti Christ......:-)
|
36.1245 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:57 | 4 |
| RE: Braxton
He returned to the game after that hit - man, did he ever get leveled!
Joe
|
36.1246 | Ho-Hum | OURGNG::RIGGEN | The worst 4-1 team in the NFL | Mon Oct 05 1992 19:03 | 3 |
| Marty Shotthimhigher is more than welcome in Pile High every Sunday possible.
This game inhaled for 55 minutes.
|
36.1247 | Go Donks! | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Oct 06 1992 16:45 | 8 |
| The last time Denver went to RFK for a monday night affair
they were big underdogs. Sound familiar? Then to
make it official, Mr Ed came down with the flu and Kubiak
had to start. The Broncos won that night. I think
they look good to win again this monday too.
BoB
|
36.1248 | Who's Johnnie's backup? | BSS::BSORENSON | The Battler | Tue Oct 06 1992 17:41 | 16 |
| Hi All,
An interesting quote is in the Colo. Sprgs. Gazette Telegraph
today. The situation was in fourth quarter when Elway was sacked for
the fifth time.
"He took a real shot there," Reeves said Monday. "I was wondering
whether he was going to continue. I told (backup) Tommy Maddox to
start warming up."
I thaught Shawn Moore was are second string quarter back and Tommy
Maddox was are third string quarter back. I wonder if something has
changed since the season started. Does anyone have any insight into
this?
B_Bob
|
36.1249 | KC looked like panic/confusion city | GBOVS1::KIRKMAN | glug..glug...glug.... | Tue Oct 06 1992 23:14 | 8 |
| Marty Shotthimhigher (tm riggen) is a quality coach, but if that game
is typical, he should be barred from the stadium on game day. That
game was gift wrapped.
Scott
Alright - I'll admitt that some of possesion O-players made some less
than intelligent decisions. B^)
|
36.1250 | He's backkkkkk! | ICS::FINUCANE | | Thu Oct 08 1992 09:02 | 32 |
| From an old friend.... 8-)
Cath
From: DECWRL::"[email protected]" "George Brooks" 7-OCT-1992 19:56:16.11
To: ics::finucane
CC:
Subj: Cunningham > Elway
Pass that along to the SPORTS faithful. Has JaKe been arrested yet ? :-)
Doc
p.s. I have a new and improved Oilers cap ....
--
George Brooks - HP Clinical Information Systems
"Fill the unforgiving minute ... "
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA08827; Wed, 7 Oct 92 16:54:29 -0700
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA19048; Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:42:25 -0400
% Received: from hpwadft.wal.hp.com by relay.hp.com with SMTP(16.6/15.5+IOS 3.13) id AA26901; Wed, 7 Oct 92 07:41:10 -0700
% Received: by hpwarp.wal.hp.com(15.11/15.5+IOS 3.22) id AA11695; Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:45:27 edt
% From: George Brooks <[email protected]>
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Subject: Cunningham > Elway
% To: ics::finucane
% Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:45:20 EDT
% Mailer: Elm [revision: 64.9]
|
36.1251 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Oct 08 1992 10:26 | 7 |
|
Cath,
Ask him if RunningPork is his *new* favorite QB. Hey! I
oughta tm that! :*)
Claybone
|
36.1252 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Crocostimpy, Quest que c'est? | Fri Oct 09 1992 11:14 | 3 |
| And what's with the Oiler cap... didn't he swear he'd never root for
them again?
|
36.1253 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Mon Oct 12 1992 13:01 | 7 |
| What's black & blue (with a hint of orange), and has a stupid grin
on it's face?
Bucky....tommorrow morning...HtH! :-)
Carloski
|
36.1254 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | And I fall down 3 times a day | Tue Oct 13 1992 00:59 | 4 |
| Yep, them Donks are definitely in top post season form, ain't they???
JaKe
|
36.1255 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:07 | 3 |
| AFC East 64
Donks 3 (or was it 6?)
Denny
|
36.1256 | big belly laughs last night | CNTROL::CHILDS | Would Saw dump a Harley for a Woman? | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:36 | 16 |
|
definately just 3 Denny....
got to admit Big Bad John was right on with those intys......Kurt Govyea
looked like the intended receiver....
did anyone catch Monday nite Matchup on ESPN...
Sherman and Jaws were doing hatch job on Reeves coaching of Elway. Basically
said he's never taught Johnny anything....
Also that Johnny isn't a good QB but just a great athlete playing QB...
hopefully this is the start of the fall for the Donks....
mike
|
36.1257 | Would ya rather be an ugly 4-2, or a pretty 2-4? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:45 | 12 |
| � AFC East 64
� Donks 3 (or was it 6?)
That sounds about right, except it should be NFC East.
So far, in the battle between the two toughest divisions (AFC West, NFC
East (IMHO)), the NFC East 3-2, has a one game advantage after lasted
night. To bad lasted nights game wasn't at Mirror-High, uhh...I mean
Mile-High.
Carlos
|
36.1258 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Would Saw dump a Harley for a Woman? | Tue Oct 13 1992 10:53 | 11 |
|
Let see the Donks have beaten, the Chargers, KC, and the Raiders. I'd hardly
say that qualifies the AFC West for toughest Division. Also to consider, the
Raiders, Seahawks, and Chargers all have loosing records. Toughest division
would probably be the AFC East on the strength of Buffalo and Miami plus
the up and coming Colts...
of course the AFC East looses points for the J-E-S-T-S.....
;^)
|
36.1259 | Donk Watch Day 1 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:06 | 13 |
| Joe Watch Day 1
Drew Watch Day 1
Kevin Watch Day 1
Jeff Watch Day 1
Tim watch Day 1
Big_Game watch day 1
BoB watch day 1
B_Bob watch day 1
Who'd I miss?
Carloski
|
36.1260 | Happy now? | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:29 | 4 |
|
Me! Trade Elway! Fire Reeves! Boot the Donks outa town! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1261 | | FRIPP::HARRIS | All this plus a whammy bar | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:21 | 4 |
|
How many time was Elway intercepted last night?
Jim
|
36.1262 | No day at the Beach | COMET::FARMERA | | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:24 | 10 |
| Ya ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
Wipe
Out!
I hate the NFC East!
|
36.1263 | FIRE REEVES | OURGNG::RIGGEN | The worst 4-2 team in the NFL | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:26 | 11 |
| Don't fire Reeves Claybroon lets take him hunting up near Steamboat. I think
I cain find a deliverance dude up there and we cain watch him sqeal like a pig.
No thats that big boob Handley's impression of coaching in the NFL.
This is one disapointed doink fan I do enjoy when they win but this team is
about as soft as Marina's titles.
Bring on the Oilers into Mile High, I know the Pope is visiting next summer
but I didn't know that he blessed the Stadium.
Jeff
|
36.1264 | With no help from the "mighty" Eagles | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:28 | 19 |
| Geeez, was that pitiful or what?!?! I figured they'd lose but I though it
might be a game, at least for awhile.
The offensive line is looking terrible...absolutely terrible. Over the past
few years they haven't been great pass protectors but have been good at
run-blocking. Right now they can't do either. And how many times are the DB's
gonna get burned on play fakes? And I mean burned bad.
The good news is that Denver's road games against NFC East teams are over.
It looks like everyone's big bad Eagles aren't all they're cracked up to be.
They got their butts kicked out in KC in a game that was "not as close as the
score might indicate."
Hey Carlos, we'll be looking for ya in the Faider file after they play an NFC
East team on the road.
Joe
|
36.1265 | Mr. Ed bites throws another | PBST::BROWN | SINGING DOO WAH DIDDY | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:29 | 10 |
|
Go Broncos !!!
and take the Nuggets with you!!!
Cadzilla
|
36.1266 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Tue Oct 13 1992 13:44 | 20 |
|
Smellway threw two interceptions last night both led to Skins TDs. He
also got benched for Maddox, I enjoyed that.
pretty poor relationship between him and Reeves. They showed them alot
last night standing side by side without talking to one another. They
also stated the Reeves told BBJ that he could call his own plays any
time he wanted too. Of course BBJ chickens out and says no Dan you
call em'....
Well I know the league won't do it but seeing how they named him offensive
player of the week a couple of times, I think we should give him an award
for defensive player of the week. He made the Skins defense look all world
last night.
Joe, I know it was a tough loss but don't be casting stones at Philly.
KC's a tough place to play and Philly was due for a letdown after the
big win against the Sowboys. Also no team ever overcomes the KOH's KOD...
mike
|
36.1267 | Und smashen ze mouthen f�tenballen! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:01 | 17 |
| �Hey Carlos, we'll be looking for ya in the Faider file after
�they play an NFC East team on the road.
Go ahead, I doubt that even the lowly faiders could do as bad as the
doinks have. Matter O'fack, I'm sure the faids will at least make a
game out of it, they match up very well against the NFC East's style of
play, as do the Chiefs. Their linemen are just as big, and they love to
play good old fashioned 'smash-mouth football'. All the faids have to
do to match the doinks level of play against the NFC East, is make one,
count it, 1 measly little field goal....Heh heh heh...
Oh yeah, and they also need to choke miserably for the other 119 min. &
55 sec. of play........ Hee haaa haaa!
HtH! :-)
Carloski
|
36.1268 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 13 1992 14:26 | 6 |
| Yo, Donks fans....
Take heart, you got Ray Handjob's(tm) Jints comin' in in a few weeks.
'SAw
|
36.1269 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 13 1992 15:12 | 5 |
|
I can hear the cheers in the stands now: "Ray must go!", "Can
Dan!" :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1270 | The Rise and Fall of Mike Shanahan. | COMET::FARMERA | | Wed Oct 14 1992 14:44 | 11 |
| What does everyone think on Denver bringing Mike Shanahan back
from the 49rs if he would come. It seems to me he was the best thing
for Elway. Played a good buffer between Reeves and Denver's own Deity.
Drew
P.S.
Why does Denver even have an offensive coordinator, jeez, we were
calling those delay runs all night and apparently so was Washington.
AAAAAACCCCCKKKkkkkkkkk!!!
|
36.1271 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Oct 14 1992 17:05 | 7 |
|
Drew,
Reeves IS the offensive coordinator. In other words, we don't
have one! :^)
Claybroon
|
36.1272 | Dan The Man... NOT !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Oct 14 1992 17:59 | 6 |
| Well,
maybe someone in Denver will finally wake up and fire Reeves.
he certinly deserves it after mondays performance !!
BG
|
36.1273 | Gambling away the future? | COMET::FARMERA | | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:20 | 14 |
| In this mornings paper I was reading that Reevs was leaving the
option open for revamping Denvers offensive offense to a Washington
style in which protection is paramount and the number of receivers is
negated. C'MON Dan, Jee we have one of the best quarter-backs around
(certainly in Denver's history) and your hedging that the receivers can
get open before Elway is dumped. Then when he does get the ball away
the majority of the time he is on the turf anyway. Somebody in that
organization has got to get a clue. I'm sorry for the editorial here
but Reeve's has put together some good Denver ball clubs only to
eventualy get crushed and at the same time endangering a great, (pseudo
great, possibly great?) quarter back who I believe has given his all
for this team.
Drew
|
36.1274 | the active interception tossing leader | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:28 | 2 |
|
Elway's great if you like a guy who throws more interceptions than TD's...
|
36.1275 | Fire Dan | OURGNG::RIGGEN | The worst 4-2 team in the NFL | Thu Oct 15 1992 14:31 | 7 |
| Dan must go, Denver's only run play is a delayed draw up the middle off left
or off right tackle. I don't remember the last time Denver lined up in the
shotgun on 1st down and ran the ball. How about a 2 back set.
Denver is gonna start Sammy Smith now we can move the ball all over the field
and fumble on the 1 yrd line.
Jeff
|
36.1276 | REEVES MUST LEEVE | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 15 1992 17:09 | 1 |
|
|
36.1277 | Mr X. said.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Fri Oct 16 1992 09:47 | 5 |
|
What gives? You guys used to tell me Reeves was great. One of the top 5
coaches in the league...
mike
|
36.1278 | They meant Arena football league | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:15 | 1 |
|
|
36.1279 | CAN DAN!!! :^) | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:34 | 7 |
|
Mikey C.
What? Now you're going to argue with us for converting to
your views? Make up your mind! Do we fire Dan or not? :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1280 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Millen the best bargin in the NFL | Fri Oct 16 1992 10:57 | 6 |
|
Sure Claybroon. What fun is it, when everyone agree with ya? Notes are
boring when everyone is in agreement. Of course it does make it easier
on the Mods...
;^)
|
36.1281 | DAN THE MAN!! ;^) | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:01 | 4 |
|
That Dan Reeves....Whatta coach! COTY for sure!
Claybroon :*)
|
36.1282 | No Oil gusher | COMET::FARMERA | | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:02 | 6 |
| Denver does it again, what a telling picture at the end of the
game with Elway comforting Moon. The announcers even announced the
drive would happen. I hate Christensen!
Drew
|
36.1283 | Another one for the Anti's... :^) | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:16 | 1 |
|
|
36.1284 | Only time I'm not | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:51 | 4 |
|
Not an Anti today.. soooo.. Thanks to BBJ and the rest of the Donks!
/Jeff
|
36.1285 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:56 | 4 |
| Where's Doc?
Have to send him mail... anything I should pass along?
|
36.1286 | Reeves Must Leave !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:57 | 27 |
| /Jeff... Great P_Name...
Well,
Once again the Mighty Donks pull a victory out of their collective
a$$es... This team ain't good enought to go far in the `offs if they
make it there. They should lay down now and get some good draft
choices come nexted(tm) year.
The almighty GAWD (John: #7) is really something to watch. they
showed him on the sidelines with 1:56 left and you could see that
he knew he would win the game. If only he could capture that magic
and be able to use it for and entire game... The Donks would be
unstoppable.
These type of wins are bad news for the Donks... No early round
lineman and Danny boy will hold on another year. I was really hoping
for a truly dismal season... along the lines of the Patsies or Jesters
would have been good... Tha would have garranteeded the ouster of
Dan_the_Man_NOT and a shot at some early picks in the upcomming draft.
Oh Well,
Go Donks (They sure make it exciting anyhow !!)
BG
|
36.1287 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:16 | 4 |
|
Sure Walt. Tell him Elway>Moon. But he knew that...
Claybroon
|
36.1288 | Moon is Great... John is GAWD !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:57 | 9 |
|
Ditto...
Also, Ask him if he's talked to Marty Shottenhimer (sp?) of late...
The Soilers and the Clowns/Chiefs have lots in common now. All
have felt the WRATH OF JOHN !!!
BG
|
36.1289 | Ho hum... | OURGNG::RIGGEN | DENVER JECKYL AND HYDES | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:25 | 7 |
| I only saw the 4th. Did the Houston Defense really stink all game ?
Fire Dan Reeves still damn straight.
Blocked punt ball on the 10, 3 plays for -1 yrds. Kick da bwall Treadwell.
Go up by 6 with 6 minutes left in the game.
|
36.1290 | A search of the record book | BASEX::BROWN | | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:13 | 7 |
|
The local paper in Detroit has found this stat about Elway.
Elway has now directed 31 game saving drives in his 10 year
career.
\pjb
|
36.1291 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:01 | 7 |
| I thought that the illegal formation calls against the Oilers were
terrific. Finally, there was an officiating crew that had the testes to
enforce what's on the books. Also, it drove Todd up the wall, which I
liked as well.
Dennis Faust
|
36.1292 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:08 | 15 |
|
> The local paper in Detroit has found this stat about Elway.
> Elway has now directed 31 game saving drives in his 10 year
> career.
Any chance they put in how many intys he threw earlier in those 31
games to put them in that posistion????
any chance they put in how many where at home (with friendly refs)
vs. on the road???
;^)
|
36.1293 | REFS | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:14 | 2 |
| You're not implying the famed "Denver death grip" are you Mike?
Denny
|
36.1294 | Elway and Kragen in `92 | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:17 | 13 |
| Mikey, You're still a Jerk !!! I love consistency, keep it up !!
To bad the Ninj is gone... I have this running feud with a fish fan
here that Elway has significantly more game saving drives , something
like 30 to Marino's 22. He insists that they are now even after
Sundays game against the Oilers before which, John was behind.
Anyone got the real story ???
Inquiring Minds And All That
BG
|
36.1295 | more consistency ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:23 | 14 |
|
> To bad the Ninj is gone... I have this running feud with a fish fan
> here that Elway has significantly more game saving drives , something
> like 30 to Marino's 22. He insists that they are now even after
> Sundays game against the Oilers before which, John was behind.
> Anyone got the real story ???
It's simple Big Game. Elway is ahead of Marino. Why? Because Marino
does more for his team in the first three quarters so his team doesn't
need him to rally them.....Elway should bend over and bark like a dog
for the defense which keeps him with in shouting distance....
mike
|
36.1296 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:30 | 5 |
| As a matter a fact Will McDonough had a story yesterday about this
exact topic. I'll post the numbers tomorrow. Elway was first, and
Staubach, Montana and Marino behind him.
Denny
|
36.1297 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:34 | 7 |
|
Who cares? As Mike says, it's a bogus stat. Underachieve for three
quarters, then pull some of the games out. The greatest teams and QBs
never have to rely on such theatrics...
glenn
|
36.1298 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:42 | 4 |
| Oh, so it's kind of like in the same category as inflated stats and
such....
I get it!
|
36.1299 | refs call nothing against home team in laST ED 2mins. | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:45 | 8 |
|
>> Oh, so it's kind of like in the same category as inflated stats and
>> such....
yup and definately effected by Park Effects....
mike
|
36.1300 | John Elway = Gawd !!! / or Mr. Ed !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:53 | 13 |
|
Denny,
An official note would be appreciated... I'd love to end all of this
Fish babble once and for all.
All others, Childs etc...
You're just jealous, Elway is the greatest of all time and you're
just pissed because he ain't playing for your team! read `em weep
boys... Elway number one in come back victories.
BG
|
36.1301 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 16:55 | 8 |
| Sombody give Big'N'Lame a multi-pack of 'Shrooms?????
Elway, best of all time, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
I just pi$$ed my pants laughing at that one.
Oh, Big'N'Lame, you slay me!!!
JaKe
|
36.1302 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:00 | 3 |
| �Elway number one in come back victories.
As long as he's not playing for an NFL championship anyway.
|
36.1303 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:20 | 4 |
| I'll be at the Hall a Fame on Sat. I'm going to take pictures for
you guys of the spaces they have reserved there for Mr Ed and Phil
Simms. I mean they must have them ready already right?
Denny
|
36.1304 | Hall Of Fame only a matter of time for John, SB or No SB ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:26 | 8 |
| Count on it !!! Elway is a Hall Of Fame QB. The greatest of all
time. (I hope Jake Pi$$ed his pants again)
BG
Donks ROOL !!!
|
36.1305 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Make the smart choice, Andre Marrou | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:28 | 7 |
|
Denny, I seriously doubt they have space reserved for Phil Simms nor does
he deserve one. Elway on the other hand is already there. Look for the
white Porclein Bowl with the American Standard label on it.....
mike
|
36.1306 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:29 | 2 |
| Don't let dINzy hear you talk about Simms like that!
Denny
|
36.1307 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:34 | 11 |
| I cain see it now,
"Ladies and Gentlemen, at this spot, you cain see the exhibit for a guy
who choked in the Super Bowl like a dog sucking down chicken bones ,
John "Mr. Ed" Elway
The next exhibit has been reserved for his teeth."
JaKe
|
36.1308 | Pirates and Leyland right up there in biggest chocker standings | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:42 | 6 |
|
Hey Fake... Git back to the Pirates note if ya wanna talk about
choking. They've done a great job of it in recent years. Your
short term memory leave much to be desired... NAAAA GIT !!!!
BG
|
36.1309 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:45 | 4 |
| Sorry, BG, but I'll have to leap to Jake's defense here and say at
least the Pirates have looked good in going down to defeat. Unlike the
Broncos, the Buccos have at least looked like they deserved to be
playing in a championship game.
|
36.1310 | does the "The all showup if it's a blowout" mean somethin'? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Legalize Drugs & win the war | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:45 | 5 |
|
Atleast they made a good accounting for themselves BG...Donk loss on the other
hand inspire great jokes.....
mike
|
36.1311 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:48 | 12 |
| At least the Pirates didn't give up 34 runs in the second inning!!
(8^)*
Lessee, what's the closest score the Donks have had in a Super Bowl???
The ones with Mr. Ed have all been MAJOR blowouts, ain't they???
He cain't bring a team back from 35 point deficits, cain he???
JaKe
|
36.1312 | A Loss is A Loss !!! no one ever says "that was a great loss" | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 17:54 | 11 |
|
No... And Ed can't play both sides of the ball either. The donks
got blown out of the SB's because they had no defense, Not because Ed
choked...
BG
P.s. The Braves are in the World Serious, Not the Pirates.
|
36.1313 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Mon Oct 19 1992 18:10 | 16 |
|
>> No... And Ed can't play both sides of the ball either. The donks
>>got blown out of the SB's because they had no defense, Not because Ed
>>choked...
I don't seem to remember the Donks scoring high amounts of points, but
I do remember a bunch of "3 & outs" and turnovers, yes, interceptions
included. If they had any kind of offense show up fer the Super Bowls,
they'd keep their own defense off the freakin' field by keeping the
damned ball.
Face it Big'N'Lame, the Donks, WHOLE TEAM that is, choked like Linda
Lovelace before she learned the technique.
JaKe
|
36.1314 | Can't BLAM Elway For SB Losses !!! BLAM Dan & Co. | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 19 1992 18:46 | 13 |
|
Kinda hard to pass the ball when you "o" line is out weighed by 30
lbs. and that, fake is no ones falt but Danny Reeves and the Bronco
Brain Truss. Elway don't pick the team... he only carries Dan's
mistakes on his back. Oh, Add a new one too... Tommy Maddox !!
Jhon will carry that one til the end of his career which because
of Dan uncanny ability to $%^&$%^*^&% a draft pick may be sonner
than later.
HTH
BG
|
36.1315 | Here they are folks | OURGNG::RIGGEN | DENVER JECKYL AND HYDES | Mon Oct 19 1992 19:29 | 32 |
| 1. 1983 21-19 over Baltimore Elway throws 3 4thqtr TD's the last a 26yd'er
with 44 seconds to Gerald Wilhite.
2. 1984 26-19 against N.E 8 play 78yds
3. 1984 16-13 against S.D. 10 play 77yds Winder with .38 seconds left.
4. 1984 16-13 against S.D. 40yds f.g.
5. 1985 44-28 against Atlanta behind 28-27 Elway throws 2 td's and a f.g.
6. 1985 17-16 against S.F. yes the Snowball game Montana won this game.
7. 1985 30-24 against S.D. 48yds for a f.g to tie Denver wins in O.T.
8. 1985 31-23 against Pittsburgh 58yds Steve Sewell run for a 24-23 lead.
9. 1985 14-13 against K.C. 8 play 59yds Winder 1 yd T.D. 22 sec
10 1985 27-24 against Seattle 10 points in the 4th.
11 1986 38-36 against Raiders 39 yds pass to Gene Lang.
12 1986 23-20 against Cleveland O.T. the DRIVE.
13 1987 31-29 against Chicago Monday night 61 yd drive
14 1987 31-20 against N.E. Never in doubt.
15.1987 38-33 against Cleveland the "FUMBLE"
16.1988 16-13 against S.F. O.T.
17.1989 16-10 against S.D 11 play 74 yds Bobby Humphrey.
18.1989 24-21 against Seattle
19.1989 24-23 against Pittsburgh Playoff game Crowd noise disturbs Bubby
20.1989 16-13 over K.C. 72 yds for a time is out F.G
21.1990 24-23 " "
22.1990 34-31 against Seattle
23.1990 27-17 against Indianapolis
24.1991 19-16 against K.C.
25.1991 9-6 over N.E. who cares
26.1991 17-7 against Cleveland
27.1991 24-19 against Phoenix
28.1991 26-24 aginst Houston Playoff last year.
29 1992 17-13 Raiders
30.1992 20-19 K.C.
31.1992 27-21 Houston
|
36.1316 | Meaningless stat anyhow. | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Tue Oct 20 1992 09:12 | 10 |
|
re: -1
The "fumble" game shouldn't be listed.. Bronco's were never behind in
that one.
I find many of those to be questionable, anyhow... any game won by
7 or more points can't be a "final drive" to win it.
/Jeff
|
36.1317 | Buccos = Browns | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:26 | 13 |
|
re. way back
glenn,
So, you don't consider the Staubach era Cowboys teams great?
I used to loathe him cuz he was always bringing the pokes
back from sure defeat.
I always thought the one measure of an athlete's greatness was
how they performed in the clutch.
Claybroon
|
36.1318 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Legalize Drugs & win the war | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:36 | 5 |
|
Most of those games they were loosing to teams that they had no business
loosing too. Face it Big Game, John is no HOF'er...
mike
|
36.1319 | Staubach was great for the whole game... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:42 | 30 |
|
> So, you don't consider the Staubach era Cowboys teams great?
> I used to loathe him cuz he was always bringing the pokes
> back from sure defeat.
>
> I always thought the one measure of an athlete's greatness was
> how they performed in the clutch.
The Staubach-era Cowboys were great. You see, each of them have these
two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't
win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor
and valor in defeat. HTH.
The difference is that when the Cowboys needed Staubach late in a game,
like Elway, he came through, but when they didn't need him to rescue
them against inferior opponents, he didn't stumble around for three
quarters to leave the game to dramatics (I know, I know, this is the
defense's fault, or the O-line's, or Coach Reeve's. Anybody but John
Elway's, in spite of Elway's often less-than-inspiring *full game*
performances, like the dogs he turned in in his last two Super Bowls).
"Game-winning drives" has bogus pseudo-stat written all over it. Does
the NFL officially define such a stat and record it? [No.] How many
opportunities has Elway had compared to Staubach? Who defines the
criteria? [Not the NFL; probably the Broncos' PR staff.] Who really
cares? Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.
glenn
|
36.1320 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 11:02 | 7 |
| Not only that, but how many of those teams mistakenly believe in a
prevent defense?
Hell, even I could engineer a drive against a prevent defense!
8^)
|
36.1321 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Oct 20 1992 11:06 | 4 |
|
In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?
|
36.1322 | Risking some NFC East crow | NROPST::MPO12::MCFALL | This is the end of the innocence | Tue Oct 20 1992 11:15 | 7 |
|
All those come from behind victories, and not one against an NFC East
team... OF course, Giants visit Broncos for a Sunday Night game in 3 weeks,
TRBC will probably "hand" Mr. Elway another one. Also, Jeff, how did
Elway throw that Field Goal against Atlanta in 1985 ? :^)
Jim M
|
36.1323 | two more | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | and the home of the Braves | Tue Oct 20 1992 11:19 | 11 |
| > In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
> McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
> Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?
Stabler was an excellent come-back quarterback, as was his predecessor
in Oakland, George Blanda (not only would Blanda take his team down the
field in the closing minutes, he'd also kick the game-winning field
goal!).
py
|
36.1324 | made a bundle betting the other teammm | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 11:32 | 10 |
|
> In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
> McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
> Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?
but Kenny was just playing with the spread.....
;^)
|
36.1325 | not exactly a Stabler | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:24 | 1 |
| Blanda is the all-time leader in interceptions with 277.
|
36.1326 | a couple of games or seasons behind? | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:26 | 6 |
|
>> Blanda is the all-time leader in interceptions with 277.
How far behind is Elway???
mike
|
36.1327 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Accidentally like a martyr | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:27 | 3 |
|
When you play as long as George did, you're going to be the all-time
leader in a bunch of categories.
|
36.1328 | another INT leader | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:28 | 1 |
| I think Jim Hart is up there too. Around 250.
|
36.1329 | | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:31 | 9 |
| re -.1
You beat me to it... Wasn't Blanda in his mid 40s when he finally
called it quits. I know he wasn't quarterbacking the last few years,
merely kicking extra points, but I'd have to guess he must have been
the oldest quaterback to have played. If not the oldest, at least
in the top three.
Bill
|
36.1330 | with little Charlie Tollar... | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:33 | 5 |
|
I might be mistaken but I think Blanda was 46 when he finally hung them up..
I used to love to watch him as an Oiler.
mike
|
36.1331 | | CAMONE::WAY | We're the dance band on the Titanic | Tue Oct 20 1992 13:39 | 7 |
| How old is Jackie Slater of the Rams?
He's one of the three oldest guys in the league, and I'm betting he's
probably the oldest guy with a "real" football job....
'Saw
|
36.1332 | ex | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 20 1992 14:25 | 11 |
|
Riggen's stats prove Elway's the best come back QB of all time !!
No question this man will be in the HOF. In Fact, I'm sure that
you will see that spot reserved for him already. All this Anti-Donk
dribble is making me sick. You've blinded yourself to one of the
greatest to ever play the game. Elway is Gawd... and theres a list
of 31 teams that will testify to that a few notes back.
FWIW
BG
|
36.1333 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Tue Oct 20 1992 14:55 | 6 |
|
BG, it is not 31 teams, CLeveland was listed there a couple hunnerd
times.
8^)
Brews
|
36.1334 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 20 1992 15:37 | 38 |
| > The Staubach-era Cowboys were great. You see, each of them have these
> two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't
> win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor
> and valor in defeat. HTH.
Ah, we're talking about rings now. No arguement from me there.
And I'm sure Elway wasn't trying to win those bowls he played in.
He has no honor or valor!
> The difference is that when the Cowboys needed Staubach late in a game,
> like Elway, he came through, but when they didn't need him to rescue
> them against inferior opponents, he didn't stumble around for three
> quarters to leave the game to dramatics (I know, I know, this is the
Well, I'm not going to try to figure out which QB had the highest
number of comebacks over better or "inferior" opponents. I'm
sure they both have their fair share of *quality* comebacks. :*)
Also, are you implying that in Elway's comebacks he laid down
for 3 quarters and then decided to play? Sounds like it.
> "Game-winning drives" has bogus pseudo-stat written all over it. Does
> the NFL officially define such a stat and record it? [No.] How many
> opportunities has Elway had compared to Staubach? Who defines the
> criteria? [Not the NFL; probably the Broncos' PR staff.] Who really
> cares? Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
> all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.
I agree. Tis a stoopid stat. I also agree that he ain't even
close to being the best QB ever. You have me confused with
Big Game!
I could care less if he makes it to the HoF. I've enjoyed
watching him play and that's all that matters to me. I think
the HoF is bogus anyway. Football is a TEAM sport which relies
heavily on their coaching staffs. Witness Barry Sanders this
year minus 2 starting OL's and Mouse Davis......
Claybroon
|
36.1335 | | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:31 | 9 |
|
This Eitherway crap...makes me sick!!!
PPPPPEEEEEUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
|
36.1336 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:36 | 8 |
| Hal,
Now ya know how we felt with "Bernice this, and Bernice that"!!!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
36.1337 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:48 | 39 |
|
>> The Staubach-era Cowboys were great. You see, each of them have these
>> two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't
>> win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor
>> and valor in defeat. HTH.
> Ah, we're talking about rings now. No arguement from me there.
> And I'm sure Elway wasn't trying to win those bowls he played in.
> He has no honor or valor!
We were talking Cowboys versus Broncos at this point. You asked me if
I thought that the Staubach-era Cowboys were great. The answer is yes.
As for the Broncos, no, I don't believe that they showed honor or valor
in their Super Bowl defeats. Losing is one thing, but I don't think
they even came close to playing to their abilities, Elway included.
> Well, I'm not going to try to figure out which QB had the highest
> number of comebacks over better or "inferior" opponents. I'm
> sure they both have their fair share of *quality* comebacks. :*)
> Also, are you implying that in Elway's comebacks he laid down
> for 3 quarters and then decided to play? Sounds like it.
Not implying anything; I'm saying outright that this is the kind of
performance I've seen from Elway many, many times. Last year's
playoff game against Houston was a perfect example. No speculation
on Elway's motives or anything; I don't think it's intentional, just
a familiar "pattern" (as President Bush might say once and then repeat
100 times over).
> I could care less if he makes it to the HoF. I've enjoyed
> watching him play and that's all that matters to me. I think
> the HoF is bogus anyway. Football is a TEAM sport which relies
> heavily on their coaching staffs. Witness Barry Sanders this
> year minus 2 starting OL's and Mouse Davis......
Agreed, and I think you have proper perspective...
glenn
|
36.1338 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:49 | 12 |
|
I don't recall, in great detail, Elway's performance in
the playoff game with Houston. I seem to remember Houston
having a big lead at halftime.
Let me tell you what I see alot of: Denver is up by 7, a
turnover occurs deep in the opponents territory, Reeves
calls 3 running plays (possibly a swing pass in the flat for
a loss), Denver settles for a FG. NO KILLER INSTINCT! I
feel the blame lies with Reeves......
Claybroon
|
36.1339 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 20 1992 16:51 | 7 |
| � I don't recall, in great detail, Elway's performance in
� the playoff game with Houston. I seem to remember Houston
� having a big lead at halftime.
You've got to be kidding, Claybroon. This marked a golden era in
T-bashing. He was hoisted so high on his own petard (and rightfully
so), that he was trying to plead temporary insanity.
|
36.1340 | enuff? | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:06 | 15 |
|
glenn,
No fair modifying your entries after I already replied! :*)
Anyhoo, I meant "great" in terms of comebacks. I saw Roger
the Dodger do it many times.....
Mac,
I only remember him (T) and his G-string thang. I do remember
Elway's heroics at the end, but not much of what happened in
the first half (other than Houston having a big lead).
Claybroon
|
36.1341 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | U.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad George | Tue Oct 20 1992 17:09 | 8 |
|
case of selective memory there Claybroon????
not to worry we all suffer from it....
Elway sucked though in the first half take my word for it...
;6)
|
36.1342 | reeves game Plan = Smoke and Mirrors !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:22 | 25 |
|
Elway was terrible in that game... Boy that brings back great
memories of Mr T... He was way way way out on a limb after that
round of Elway Magic. I still have some of the personal mail that
T sent me at the time... I ought to post some of the dribble he
sent me just for old time sake. The man was a master at his craft.
(I have yet to figure out exactly what that was, I'm sure we all
have our own thoughts on it though)
I have to agree with Claybroon... The trouble with the Donks
lies squarely on the sholders of Dan Reeves, Not Mr. Ed !!
Hey did any one see where the Donks are out searching franticly
for a punter due to Horans injury...??? I don't know why, Brad
Delviso (sp?) seem to play well durring the rest of the game. He
had four punts for a 48.2 yrd avg or something like that. Again,
Danny has his head where the sun don't shine !!
BG Elway is GAWD !!!!!!! Childs is BOZO !!!!!!!!
|
36.1343 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:30 | 5 |
|
Nah Mike, I try to concentrate on the W's and L's. That
game was a W! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1344 | Factx are fax | OURGNG::RIGGEN | DENVER JECKYL AND HYDES | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:40 | 5 |
| The trick to this whole enchilada is most of these games are in MILE HIGH
stadium. That is 5280 feet above sea level for you flatlanders. This makes any
athelete suffer from a lack of oxygen after 45 minutes of chasing Mr. John
Elway and I mean chase cause the O-line has larger holes than my grandma's
support stockings.
|
36.1345 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Bringing Deion and his big bad icebox... | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:43 | 3 |
| The oldest current NFL player (I think) is Steve "Don't Pay the
Ferryman" DeBerg....
|
36.1346 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Oct 20 1992 18:54 | 30 |
|
> Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
> all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.
Very well put. He's great when you're tied or within striking distance in the
last few minutes of a game, he's a great scambler, has a great arm, and has
displayed an incredible resistance to injury over the past few years despite
being sacked more than most NFL quarterbacks. However, he doesn't throw a good
touch pass (most of the time), throws a terrible screen pass, isn't good at the
short passing game, doesn't play-fake well, and has a bad TD-to-int ratio and
therefore bad QB ratings. And he never will be good at any at any of these
things.
I don't think it's any coincidence that Elway performs well in the last few
minutes of a game when Denver needs to move downfield quickly and they're
running a wide open offense. Sure, defense are usually in a prevent, but Elway
thrives on that wide open, unorthodox, broken-play type of an offense and would
be much more effective for 60 minutes instead of 2 if Denver ran this type of
offense all this time. You have a QB like Elway, you design your offense
around him.
As for the HOF, I don't think John gets in unless Denver wins a Super Bowl with
him at QB. He doesn't have nearly the great numbers deserving of being in the
Hall, but with a ring, his good winning percentage, and all the great comebacks
he would probably get in. A Marino, on the other hand, is a shoo-in even if
Miami never reaches another Super Bowl, let alone win one.
Joe
|
36.1347 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Tue Oct 20 1992 20:05 | 15 |
|
I heard Elway say on a talk show that he just loves it when he has to
do a comeback like that because everything is so open and it's alot
like sandlot.
He's obviously very good at it.
It seems to me that Reeves would attempt to incorporate this open
sandlot style of play into a game plan so as to take advantage of
Elway's ability and love for this style of game rather than attempt to
fit Elway into an old offensive style that Reeves learned 20 years ago
from Landry. FYI IMHO.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.1348 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | It's a BURP thang!! | Tue Oct 20 1992 20:34 | 5 |
| Elway:==Brister wif big teef
JaKe
|
36.1349 | Reeves Must Leave !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Oct 21 1992 11:38 | 8 |
|
Jake = Loud Mouth for Pit !! Bubba couldn't carry Johns Toof
Brush... ;^)
Well said Glenn... And there we have it, Reeves is stuck in Never
Never land.
BG
|
36.1350 | Toof funny! | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the Kid... | Wed Oct 21 1992 12:35 | 10 |
| >> Bubba couldn't carry Johns Toof Brush... ;^)
It would probably take an entire eleven man squad to pick that sucker up!
In fact they are considering using it for the Weight lifting event
in the next Olympics. ;^)
Just picture it, Horseface walks up to it every morning and runs up
and down beside it rubbing those oversized insisors on it as he goes!
Bill
|
36.1351 | Betters line | COMET::FARMERA | | Wed Oct 21 1992 14:50 | 5 |
| Does anyone know what the line is for San Diego Sunday? With
Bernstein out it was surely to change I would believe.
Drew
|
36.1352 | And Thats About Right !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:40 | 3 |
| Denver +1
BG
|
36.1353 | | ROCK::MURPHY | | Wed Oct 21 1992 18:27 | 7 |
| Give the 1. Or give up. If Denver can't win in SD, they'll never win on
the road (except for, of course, Cleveland and KC) Was playing poker this
Sunday in Connecticut with some very angry New Yorkers who have yet to discover
the dogma of taking Denver at home. Elway truly is, as you so eloquently put
it, Gawd...
Murph
|
36.1354 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Oct 21 1992 23:09 | 14 |
| HOF is a sore subject with most Donk fans. Sorry to disagree
with you BG but #7 doesn't make it either at least at this
point in time. Sure Fran made it with 3 SB losses but he
had other significant qb rankings to give him the needed votes.
Elway's only legitimate shot at HOF is to win the bowl. If he wins
the bowl he's a shoo-in. No bowl. No hall.
Drive I
Drive II
Son of Drive
Great grandson of Drive III
etc..............
BoB
|
36.1355 | Reeves denies looking for new job | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:56 | 14 |
| From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Reeves denies interest in Phoenix job
Date: 21 Oct 92 19:45:22 GMT
LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- Denver Broncos Coach Dan Reeves said Wednesday he
would not consider leaving the team after the season to coach the
Phoenix Cardinals.
ESPN reported Reeves is a leading candidate to replace Phoenix Coach
Joe Bugel, whose team is 1-5 and last in the NFC East.
``There is certainly no interest on my part in going anywhere,''
Reeves told KMPC radio in Los Angeles. ``Where it (the rumor) gets
started, I don't know.''
Reeves' contract with the Broncos expires at the end of the season.
|
36.1356 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Bad, bad Jackson Brown | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:04 | 7 |
|
ESPN did not report that, Fred Edelstein did. THe same Fred EDelstein
who said Bugel was gone after they lost the sowboys game. If
Edelstein's picks were in the KOH, he'd be the only guy picking the
Gints every time. ooops
Brews
|
36.1357 | only mains play in the desert | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:24 | 7 |
| Yeah they had Fred on KTAR last night. The guy is a sports version of
Rona Barrett.
I'm glad Reeves is staying in Denver. His collies wouldn't like it
here.
Mike
|
36.1358 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:44 | 4 |
|
#&#$%^*%^&^%&(%^#$%#$%@^ We'll never get rid of the curse...
BG
|
36.1359 | :-0 cuz c=>:*')) | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Thu Oct 22 1992 13:46 | 1 |
|
|
36.1360 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Oct 22 1992 18:50 | 12 |
| Revees' most obvious shortcoming to me is his inability
to long range plan the team. He also seems to distance
himself from his players and communications problems seem
obvious at times.
On the other hand he has made some pretty good decisions too.
I never really expected Denver to make any of the bowls he
got them to. Many expected or even hoped for a disastorous season
this year to justify booting the guy. Right now he's 5-2
and in 1st place. How many other coaches are on the ropes
with a 1st place team?
BoB
|
36.1361 | Reeves Must Leave !!!1 | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 22 1992 19:00 | 8 |
| BoB,
Whats a matta You, get it together dude... Reeves is a loser,
at least when it counts. I want a ring for this team and would
love to see john get one as well. With Dan around that'll never
happen.
BG
|
36.1362 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Oct 22 1992 19:47 | 26 |
| > Revees' most obvious shortcoming to me is his inability
> to long range plan the team.
Well, you certainly wouldn't think so by the way he drafted this past spring.
I still say he drafted Denver's QB of the future a year or two ahead of time.
> On the other hand he has made some pretty good decisions too.
> I never really expected Denver to make any of the bowls he
> got them to. Many expected or even hoped for a disastorous season
> this year to justify booting the guy. Right now he's 5-2
> and in 1st place. How many other coaches are on the ropes
> with a 1st place team?
Glad to see at least one Denver fan has some sense.
There's alot of things that Dan does that I don't agree with either, but you
can't argue with his record. What was Denver expected to do in '89, coming off
an 8-8 season? [Answer: not a whole lot]. But what did they do? Go 11-5 and
become AFC Champions. What was Denver expected to do in '91, coming off a 5-11
season? [Answer: zilch]. But what did they do? Go 12-4 and make it all the
way to the AFC Championship game.
BG, maybe you'd be happier being a fan of Indy, Tampa, or Seattle, just to name
a few.
Joe
|
36.1363 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Fri Oct 23 1992 10:05 | 9 |
|
last's years record is nothing to crow about Joe. It was against a last place
schedule. Look at Vikings this year. Even my Giants benefited from an easier
schedule two years ago. And of course one must not forget the weakness of the
AFC in general and favorable treatment at Pile-It-High....
The Donks without a doubt year in and year out are luckiest team in the league
;^)
|
36.1364 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Oct 23 1992 10:32 | 16 |
|
Believe it or not Joe, MikeyC. has a coupla good points.
The thing that irks me about Reeves is that he will not
go get Elway a descent line. What do you think the Broncs
chances are if Elway gets hurt? They are damn lucky he's
not hurt already given the number of sacks he's absorbed
(not to mention the hits he takes just after releasing the
ball).
I think overall Reeves is good coach and, all kidding aside,
I don't think he should be fired. I just feel that they are
letting JohnnyBoy go to waste. He's probably got 2-3 more
good years left and it'll be spent behind a crap line.
Claybroon
|
36.1365 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:14 | 27 |
|
> The thing that irks me about Reeves is that he will not
> go get Elway a descent line. What do you think the Broncs
> chances are if Elway gets hurt? They are damn lucky he's
> not hurt already given the number of sacks he's absorbed
> (not to mention the hits he takes just after releasing the
> ball).
> I think overall Reeves is good coach and, all kidding aside,
> I don't think he should be fired. I just feel that they are
> letting JohnnyBoy go to waste. He's probably got 2-3 more
> good years left and it'll be spent behind a crap line.
Clay, did you read my note a few back? Like I said, there's alot of things
Reeves does I don't agree with either, and one of the them is how he utilizes
John. He wants to establish a running game and a ball-control offense. Hey,
I'd love to see that, but when you've got a sandlot QB and a terrible offensive
line it's not exactly the best system to go with.
One thing alot of people forget is that Reeves has drafted a couple of linemen
high in the draft that didn't stick around. Hinton was a 1st-round pick back
in '83 but was involved in the Elway trade and there was Perry a few years ago
but he couldn't keep himself out of trouble.
Joe
|
36.1366 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:22 | 5 |
|
Yeah, I read it. I just wanted to let you know that there
was at least 2 Bronco fans with some sense! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1367 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Fri Oct 23 1992 11:26 | 15 |
| I find it hard to believe that the doinks have had a crappy line
throughout Bucky's career, and yet they still ain't got no rings.
The way I figure it, Reeves has become the scapegoat despite his
ability to turn average/sub-average teams into contendahs, simply
because admiring doink fans refuse to accept the fack that Bucky, in
all his splendor, still leaves much to be desired. Maybe if Bucky would
come off his high horse (and by the way, it's very difficult to tell
which one's which) and try to work with Reeves a little, you know kinda
like a team, then maybe the doinks could get the ever elusive ring for
both Bucky and Reeves (and the other 43 players you hardly hear
anything about). JMHO.
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1368 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:37 | 7 |
|
re .1364 by Clay-wad
I think Reeves HAS given Mr ED a descent line. Once the ball is
snapped, they all fall down.
Brews
|
36.1369 | HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA� | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Fri Oct 23 1992 12:56 | 1 |
|
|
36.1370 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Oct 23 1992 13:01 | 9 |
|
Heh, heh. I saw that after I entered it. I left it in
to see who would snap it up.
Denver actually has what I call a sentry line. You know,
look-outs. LOOK OUT JOHN!
Claybroon
|
36.1371 | donks wins = anti's from woodwork | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Fri Oct 23 1992 17:40 | 13 |
| Alot of talk, but nothing "new" getting said!
Don't be suprised to see the donks lose this weekend. SD has a
decent defense (stats wise), and denver has had trouble stopping the
run at times this year.
Who knows, it might be another FG 12-6 type of game.
Mark Jackson says denvers offense is coming around, and this weekend
might just tell the tale.
Tim
|
36.1372 | Pardon the pun. | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Oct 23 1992 20:01 | 9 |
| I hate to beat a dead horse but it seems to me that most
discussions about Mr Ed are brought on by the anti-Donks(tm)
But even they have to admit screaming at their TV's on
occasion and feeling that terrible sinking feeling in their
stomach when he breaks out of the pocket. Don't confuse
yourself with stats and qb rankings either. Leave the
big numbers to Marino and the others.
BoB
|
36.1373 | everyone's doing it | FRETZ::HEISER | evidence that demands a verdict | Fri Oct 23 1992 23:54 | 1 |
| Go ahead Bob and beat that horse.
|
36.1374 | (8^)* | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 26 1992 01:17 | 13 |
| Boy, if replay was still being used, Mr. Ed woulda got another chance
at bringing the Donks from a big deficit, BUT, the Donks got hosed on
the INT call at the end and lost.
Breaks my heart
NOT!!!!!!!!!!!
Mr. So_Damned_Great and the Donks lose AGAIN, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
36.1375 | | FDCV07::KING | I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!! | Mon Oct 26 1992 08:55 | 3 |
| Hey Jac... Nice P_N�!!!!!�
REK
|
36.1376 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Beat Nebraska | Mon Oct 26 1992 11:27 | 24 |
| It's a miracle - Elway didn't get sacked once!
Missed the 2nd half. It figures that when the offense decides to play a pretty
decent game that the defense gives up more than its share of big plays and Stan
Humphries has a career day.
6-2 at the midway point would've been great, but 5-3 is pretty good. Thanks to
KC getting unexpectedly upset last night, Denver still holds a 1-game lead in
the division, but will be a game behind Houston in the race for a bye in the
first round of the playoffs if the Oilers win next week (Looks like I'll be a
Pittsburgh fan again next week). Denver has taken care of business at home
with a 4-0 record, but things are different on the road. I felt before the
season a 4-4 road record would've been great, but being only 1-3 and road games
left at LA, Buffalo, and KC, a 4-4 road record will take a minor miracle.
Glancing at the schedules of Denver, KC, and LA, KC probably has the easiest
of the 3 but only slightly. Denver still has to play at KC and at LA; the
Faids still have to play at Philly and at Washington. And add a 4th team to
the race - the Chargers. With their 3-game winning streak they can move into a
tie with KC at 4-4 with a win next week, and their schedule is pretty soft the
rest of the way.
Joe
|
36.1377 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:26 | 23 |
| Congrats to the Chargers and their fans. The Chargers dominated the
1st half.
The officiating sucked. There were at least 5 bad calls, and it
went both ways.
Not sure why Elway was trying to get a TD in that last series that he
was picked (out of the endzone). He had plenty of time to just drive
it down and at least get in FG range. O'well!
Elway had good protection yesterday! The running game came around a
little bit in the 2nd half. Keep Green on the bench!
Go from shotgun on 1st down more often!
Rivers had a great game. They are finally using him!
Next week off and then its the jets and gints. It should be 2 more
wins at home.
Tim
|
36.1378 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:33 | 4 |
|
3 interceptions, that my buddy Johnny....
;^)
|
36.1379 | Stripes take another game from a road team !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 26 1992 12:55 | 10 |
|
Another typical Donks game... Piss an easy win right down their
leggs. Oh well, it's a tight race in the west, could make for an
interesting late season.
Big Game
P.s. That INT call in the endzone with BS... Not even close. That
kinda crap is a great reason to bring back Instant Replay. Donks
got burned by the Zebras... No question !!!
|
36.1380 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Mon Oct 26 1992 14:37 | 16 |
| > That INT call in the endzone with BS... Not even close. That
> kinda crap is a great reason to bring back Instant Replay. Donks
> got burned by the Zebras... No question !!!
Well now the refs screwed the Donks? I guess there must be a God somewhere.
It'll still take atleast 100 more screwing of this types for the Donks to
be even of being on the wrong side of the call. Hopefully those 100 will
happen sooner than later......
;^)
ps. even if the call was bad, the pass was even worst cause it was in the
defenders hands....
mike
|
36.1381 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Mon Oct 26 1992 15:37 | 15 |
|
>><<< Note 36.1375 by FDCV07::KING "I've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!" >>>
>> Hey Jac... Nice P_N�!!!!!�
>> REK
Ya know, that's what I get fer making another P_name wager with TCM.
Earlier this year I got thangs my way when the Pens beat the Rangers,
and then won the Cup, and he wore a Pens P_name for what seemed like
ferever.
JaKe
|
36.1382 | sigh of relief in these parts | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Mon Oct 26 1992 15:46 | 6 |
| Had I lost this p-name bet it would have made the p-name in the spring
look like a heavenly god-send. This time it would have been something
like I love the Bucs so much I am moving to Pittsburgh - gag!
The Crazy Met
|
36.1383 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 26 1992 15:57 | 2 |
| It's not the refs fault that the Broncos dug themselves a 17 point
hole.
|
36.1384 | | DECWET::METZGER | �(���)� Hi, I'm Ross Perot... | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:05 | 10 |
|
Big Game,
Replay wouldn't have overruled that call. The officials decided that the
defender was pushed out of bounds by the wide receiver. IMO it was a
wicked bad call but Instant replay wouldn't have changed anything.
Yet another unreversible play...
Metz
|
36.1385 | Jerry Sieman is a gambler... Got to be !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:54 | 14 |
|
Can It Mac !!!! ;^)
Metz... That wasn't the only "Wicked Bad Call" that couldn't have
been reversed by IR. Did anyone get a gander at the Pass Interference
call against Mark Jackson... He never touched Blaylock. I'm telling
you, when I see games like this I wonder if HOOT wasn't correct in his
claims of fixed games and the NFL being like the WWF. What a crock !!
If I were Bobby Cox, I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
Broncos Still on top !!
BG
|
36.1386 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 26 1992 16:59 | 17 |
|
> If I were Bobby Cox, I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
Bobby Cox was in on it too? Wow, loses the Series on Saturday night
(following /Don's script), and right back at it, game-fixing on Sunday
afternoons.
Mac's right. The Broncos did their usual three-quarters underachievement
routine, and the great John Elway's not supposed to leave things to
chance like that. Does this game get entered into the 4th-quarter
comeback list, with an asterisk for "woulda been 'cept for da refs!"?
;-)
glenn
|
36.1387 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:02 | 8 |
|
> Does this game get entered into the 4th-quarter
> comeback list, with an asterisk for "woulda been 'cept for da refs!"?
Glenn, only Ford Frick can asterisk things.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1388 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:05 | 3 |
| � Can It Mac !!!! ;^)
Sorry, BG, I forgot how much you hate being confronted with the facts.
|
36.1389 | Zebras in vegas blowing sundays earnings !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:37 | 6 |
| Big Boo Boo... That should have read Ross instead of Cox...
Me stupid !!
And don't you forget it MAC !!! ;^)
BG
|
36.1390 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Decked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbest | Tue Oct 27 1992 10:59 | 3 |
|
BG, even if replay was around they don't use it on pass interference calls.
They only uses were to verify td, in-bounds, receptions and fumbles...
|
36.1391 | You Got a reading problem ?? | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 27 1992 11:26 | 22 |
|
Mikey... I think you ought to reread what I wrote... Get a Clue !
BG
^^^^^^
>> Metz... That wasn't the only "Wicked Bad Call" that couldn't have
>> been reversed by IR. Did anyone get a gander at the Pass Interference
>> call against Mark Jackson... He never touched Blaylock. I'm telling
>> you, when I see games like this I wonder if HOOT wasn't correct in his
>> claims of fixed games and the NFL being like the WWF. What a crock !!
>> If I were Bobby Cox, I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
Broncos Still on top !!
BG
|
36.1392 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:29 | 15 |
| �Well now the refs screwed the Donks?
�It'll still take atleast 100 more screwing of this types for the Donks
�to be even of being on the wrong side of the call.
Hit the nail right on the head there Mikey! The doinks are finally on
the receiving end of a bad call and the doinky fans can't quit their
snivelling. Elway's a joke, I cain't believe some people actually think
he's HoF bound. By the way, I wunder if there's anyway we could get
that ref to work at 'Mirror High' on a permanent basis, of course that
would mean an even number of bad calls for the doinks as for the
visiting team, which in turn would mean that the magic of 'Mirror High'
would be nullified and the doinks would lose at home too! HtH
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1393 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Mets in '93 | Tue Oct 27 1992 16:32 | 14 |
|
>>snivelling. Elway's a joke, I cain't believe some people actually think
>>he's HoF bound. By the way, I wunder if there's anyway we could get
I personally think he's HoF bound
Hall of Feces, that is
(8^)*
JaKe
|
36.1394 | Squeelers will show true colors and fold soon too !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Oct 27 1992 17:40 | 8 |
|
Hey !!! thats enough of that crap (hehehe) You girls get outa
here and get back to the squeelers/faiders topic where ya belong.
The Donks got burned by the Zebras... But... We're still in
1st place Carlittleone and the faiders are starting their dive
to the cellar early... not far to go from where they are either.
BG
|
36.1395 | Poor Broncos. Will they ever catch a break from the REFS�? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow | Wed Oct 28 1992 12:11 | 1 |
|
|
36.1396 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Oct 28 1992 21:41 | 13 |
|
I didn't see the game or see the play but I have seen enough
games and plays this season to know something has to be
done about getting the calls right. It's a tricky problem.
Fortunately the Raiders and Chiefs and Seahawks lost too
giving the Chargers a 1 game gain on everybody. The
Raiders continue to inch their way to the cellar.
At the half way point, none of these teams look good.
A week off then hosting the Jets may be just what the
Dr. ordered to get the 2nd half rolling.
BoB
|
36.1397 | It'll be painfully obvious by the end of the season | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Thu Oct 29 1992 08:36 | 7 |
|
The AFC West is overrated! After a few off years the real power of
the AFC is shifting back into the Central.
HtH,
/Jeff
|
36.1398 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Oct 29 1992 10:52 | 9 |
| GIVE IT A REST JEFF !!!
Where do you see any "POWER" in the central division ?? More like
a bunch of wimpy girly-mon open faced sandwich eaten limp wristed
losers.
;^)
BG
|
36.1399 | | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | Money talks, but Credit has an Echo | Thu Oct 29 1992 12:44 | 8 |
|
BG.. please refer to 56.1720
Now we'll probably hear the division refered to as "balanced"..
AFC Central Rooolz.
/Jeff
|
36.1400 | cellar dwellers | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Nov 03 1992 10:22 | 11 |
| �The Raiders continue to inch their way to the cellar.
Get a clue BoB! If anything is true, it's just the opposite, the faids
started out in the cellar and they're inching their way out. Now if you
wanna talk about inching they're way into the cellar you're in the
right notes topic, the powerful doinks are looking more and more
pathetic with each passing week. HtH :-)
Carloski
|
36.1401 | Jets on sunday | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 03 1992 14:12 | 8 |
| Your right Carlos. I stand corrected. The Raiders started
in the cellar after playing the Donks. You also hit
close to something I don't like too much. I hope I'm wrong
but Denver could be ripe for a 2nd half collapse. Either way,
I dont see any of the AFC west teams doing well in the playoffs
at this point in time.
BoB
|
36.1402 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 03 1992 14:58 | 8 |
| BoB... are you predicting a Jesters victory...
What are you,
Crazy !!!!!
BG
|
36.1403 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 03 1992 15:30 | 8 |
| The outcome sunday will tell the tale for the Denver's season.
Denver should win this game at home but a loss shoots down the
whole year.
Dan Quayle was on TV today. He told everybody to
"be sure to go out and vot!"
BoB
|
36.1404 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 04 1992 22:44 | 9 |
| I was talking with one of the Jets faithfull today.
She said the Jets came to Denver about 4 or 5 years
ago and beat the Broncos. I was at a Jets Bronco game
about 10 years ago or more (where does the time go?).
Todd was qb for NY and they pulled a tremendous come
from behind win over Denver. They seem to like this
stadium.
BoB
|
36.1405 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Thu Nov 05 1992 08:29 | 6 |
| I was reading yesterday's USA Today. In the Sports section,
there was a picture of Elway and his family. He and his wife
have four kids. All the kids have as much ivory in their
mouths as dad does.
Scott
|
36.1406 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Nov 05 1992 09:49 | 6 |
| Last time I remember the Jets and Denver playing was in '86 on a Monday
night in the Meadowlands. The Jets won that one 22-10. I can't recall the
Jets playing in Denver in quite a while.
Joe
|
36.1407 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Thu Nov 05 1992 15:48 | 14 |
|
>> I was reading yesterday's USA Today. In the Sports section,
>> there was a picture of Elway and his family. He and his wife
>> have four kids. All the kids have as much ivory in their
>> mouths as dad does.
Just think, if those teef were really ivory, Elway'd have to hire a
security force to protect him and the fambily, cause the poachers that
are in Africa killing off the elephants fer their tusks would drop
everything and take the firsted plane fer Denver, big guns in hand.
JaKe
|
36.1408 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Thu Nov 05 1992 15:56 | 10 |
| The last Denver and the Jets played before 1986 was 1980. Last four
meetings between Denver and NYJ:
1986 (in NY) Jets won, 22-10
1980 (in Denver) Denver won 31-24
1978 (in Denver) Jets won 31-28
1976 (in Denver) Denver won 46-3
Joe
|
36.1409 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 05 1992 16:40 | 5 |
| Looking good... Denver's turn to win it !!!
Where are ya JoJ_not... Ain't heard from ya yet !!
BG
|
36.1410 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Nov 06 1992 15:10 | 3 |
| 2 tix available for sunday's Jets game at $25 apiece
BoB
|
36.1411 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Set Hidden Patrol is Riding agin | Fri Nov 06 1992 16:06 | 5 |
| I'll take them, send me the two tickets AND the $50 for taking them!!!
JaKe
|
36.1412 | BRONCOS POISED FOR TURN AROUND !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 09 1992 11:36 | 43 |
|
YES !!!
Danny Boy let Mr. Ed call his own plays and the Bronco offense
actually showed a spark of life against a much improved NY. Jesters
team. John called a brillant game against the Jests... Hopefully
Dan and the Collies will wake up and use an offense designed to
take full advantage of Elways top notch quarter backing skills.
I see the no huddle as the next logical step for these Mighty
Broncos on their road to yet another AFC championship and a shot
at a Superbowl victory.
Sammy Smith was a huge mistake for the Donks... they should
have sucked in their pride and made Bobby Humphries an off to
keep him in Denver. If that could not be accomplished they
should have looked for at least an average O'lineman for back-
up in injury situations. Smith will again be side lined with a
groin injury. Green showed signs of life towards the end of
the game but the O'line needs to make a few slightly larger
hole for him to return to his effectivness of last year.
Next weeks game against the Midgets should be a tell tale game
for the Donks. With LT out (damn Shame by any standard) the offensive
line should be able to provide Mr. Ed with some protection. One
small tid bit... No sacks on Teeth in 2 weeks. This team might
be poised to turn the corner. The true test will come against
the surging Doughboys in a few weeks. If the Donks can win this game
they will prove to the NFC (and more importantly themselves)that they
can compete in the much touted east.
Elway is truly one of the best team players in the NFL today. He
has supported the teams decisions through think and thin. For Danny
to break down and make the drastic changes made this week clearly
shows that his job is not as secure as many might think. Elway is
this franchise... Reeves may have figured that out this week.
BG
WARDLE... THE JESTS SIP !!
|
36.1413 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 09 1992 11:41 | 17 |
| The Broncos won a must-win game yesterday over the Jets, 27-16. Denver was on
the verge of putting it away late in the 3rd, but managed to add a little drama
until the Jets turned the ball over at midfield trailing by 4, and Denver
proceeded to take it into the end zone for the clincher.
The offensive line, a major disaster area a month ago, is slowly turning into
a solid unit - the running game was decent yesterday and they didn't allow any
sacks for the 2nd game in a row. Actually, the whole offense seems to be
getting better while the defense is starting to slip. The Jets moved the ball
quite effectively yesterday, especially on the ground, where NY averaged a
whopping 8 yards per carry.
Green had a good day, averaging over 5 yards a carry, and Arthur Marshall had a
terrific day with 5 catches for 134 yards and a TD.
Joe
|
36.1414 | JoJ_NOT watch, day 1 | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Mon Nov 09 1992 12:04 | 5 |
|
BG did JoJ ever get in touch with you??
The Crazy Met
|
36.1415 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:46 | 6 |
|
NEVER...
The guys a loser !!! I was looking for a P-Name change ...
BG
|
36.1416 | time to get even!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Wed Nov 11 1992 12:21 | 7 |
|
Well BG, the Giants are coming to town this weekend to kick the crap out
the Donks per usual. No amount of scrambling or preferential treatment
will save Mr. Ed. Perhaps you'd care to risk a p-name on the outcome?
Winner's choice naturally....
;^)
|
36.1417 | No points... Even up !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 13:11 | 11 |
| You're on...
What did ya have in mind o ye mindless one... ;^)
How about this. You win, my P-name becomes "Giants, Greatest Team
Ever"
I win, Your P-name becomes "John Elway, My Hero and Mentor"
BG
|
36.1418 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Wed Nov 11 1992 13:14 | 3 |
|
Like I said the winner gets to chose the other's p-name....I haven't decided
on yours yet.....and the looser wears it for a week....
|
36.1419 | Your on... I got the Donks and we go even, no points ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 13:18 | 5 |
| You're on !!! that'll give me some time to think of a really
great one that will shame you for life. Nothing to outragous
though...
BG
|
36.1420 | hth ;*) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Hail to Bill Long and TcM | Wed Nov 11 1992 13:24 | 10 |
| a voice from the sidelines....
OK guys, just make syre that the loser's p-name passes the scrutiny
of MtM. I don't think you'd want anything hidden from all to see,
right?
I remain,
a guardian angle!
Kev
|
36.1421 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:07 | 4 |
| Donks are due besides the Giants have never played at
Denver at night. What ever that means.
BoB
|
36.1422 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:43 | 11 |
| The Giants are one of 2 teams that the Broncos have never beaten under
Reeves.
The other is...
...Miami.
Joe
|
36.1423 | I don't trust you, Mikey !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:57 | 11 |
|
The Donks will win this one... And then Childs will be saddled
with a P-Name that will shame him for life.
BG
ps. Childs, One stipulation to the P-Name bet. The loser (you) has
to enter a minimum of one note per day for the entire week.
Agreed ???
|
36.1424 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Nov 11 1992 14:59 | 4 |
| Hey Mike, does 'saw know what you are doing? I mean Ray is still the
coach...
Brews
|
36.1425 | I don't trust ya, Mikey!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:18 | 9 |
|
I couldn't be happier... The KOD has been applied. The Midgets
lose, thanks Mikey !!
BG
BTW: I don't consider this P-name wager finalized yet. I want an
absolute answer. Yes or No... Are we on with the stated
expectations. Do you need me to read them to ya??
|
36.1426 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:35 | 9 |
|
Look Jack, you should know by now that I don't run away and not note for
a while like some might. Because you know that you will be the looser, if
you feel the need to have the one note per day stipulation put in that's
fine with me.....
here's you p-name for next week. John Elway, Spoiled Brat, Girly-mon
mike
|
36.1427 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:36 | 4 |
|
Brews, even Ray can't loose this one.....
mike
|
36.1428 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:37 | 3 |
| Giants/Donks...onea those games where it's too bad one team has to
win!
Denny
|
36.1429 | | FDCV07::KING | | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:45 | 3 |
| Denny, they could tie.....
REK
|
36.1430 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Wed Nov 11 1992 15:55 | 3 |
|
that's true they could tie. If they do I say were both loosers BG and have
to wear the p-names of the others choice....
|
36.1431 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie's formula - $70/case | Wed Nov 11 1992 16:25 | 7 |
| �Title: Your on... I got the Donks and we go even, no points !
^^^^
You're
Geeze, and you had it right in the body of the text...
The 'Cadet
|
36.1432 | Picky Picky !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 16:45 | 14 |
|
Mikey...
Agreed... I case of a tie we both wear the P-Name. I haven't thought
of your P-Name yet... I'll get back to ya.
=Bob=,
A simple typo... Don't waste your education on me, I have my own
to waste. I think I made my point regardless !
HTH,
BG
|
36.1433 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Wed Nov 11 1992 17:16 | 18 |
| Finally, time to note!
The Broncos OL has looked good, but they haven't had alot of
blitzing to deal with, unlike during the 'skins & iggles games.
Expect more pressure on Biff.
The defensive line sucks! They don't have a pass rush that will be
effective. Sports casters praise Kragen, but I don't think he is that
good, no matter what his work ethic is like.
Reeves might want to let Biff call the plays this weekend since Elway
has more of a clue on being less predictable.
If Broncos stop the jints from running wild, then I beleive they
will win.
Tim
|
36.1434 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 11 1992 17:20 | 3 |
| Is Jill_the_excited still around? Quite a few of the other Bronco
noters have come out of the woodwork now that football season is in
full swing.
|
36.1435 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Wed Nov 11 1992 17:29 | 3 |
| Don't know... there was some TFSO action up there. Ask the Devil Dog
BG
|
36.1436 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 11 1992 18:07 | 4 |
| I see Jill on occasion. Let's see if we can get an
encore appearance.
BoB
|
36.1437 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Nov 12 1992 11:11 | 6 |
|
Jill, like many donk noters of old, hasn't been seen in here since Jan.
26 of 1986. Like JD after UA almost beat Miami, they've been away on
business quite a bit lately.
Brews
|
36.1438 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Nov 12 1992 11:12 | 5 |
|
rooollling Brews. Thanks I needed that.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1439 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Nov 12 1992 11:20 | 7 |
| Brews -
UA almost beat Miami. Sort of like Bush almost beat Clinton, the Argentinians
almost beat the Brits. Almost is almost. They lost. Now, the Dawgs did lose
to UA. Not almost. ND did lose to Stanford. ND almost lost to BC....
JD
|
36.1440 | It Never Fails, Open Your Trap and it Happens ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 12 1992 11:28 | 18 |
| Well...
I hate to be the one to have to put this in here but it only seems
right that I do. I was reading the Denver Post this morning at
breakfast, the sports section had an interesting article about the
ELWAY VS. REEVES play calling pi$$ing contest. Elway said "If I had
my choice I'd really rather be calling the plays". Reeves retorts
with, "It's easy to tell whos calling the plays, if it works it was
John, If it doesn't, it was Me".
Damn It John !!! I was just defending you against this kind of crap.
Put a friggin lid on it and play ball !!
I Remain,
Disillusioned in Colorado Springs,
BG (Thanks Kev)
|
36.1441 | Not gone and glad to see not forgotten! | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Thu Nov 12 1992 12:36 | 24 |
|
What a minute! I've made an appearance every year and not just 1986. Cheap
shot from the cheap shot artist. TFSO has not taken me yet, but it's looming
on the horizon again. We're rather busy right now because they are dispersing
my team into other teams, having us try to figure out what a roles are, and
giving us new job codes...which we don't know what they are yet. It's a
trying time.
I am still among the Bronco faithful, but I've got a beau who isn't much
on football, so I haven't seen much this season. Maybe 3-4 games. I'm
trying to bring him around, but with church and activities on Sunday,
we don't always get to watch the games. It's not that he doesn't like
the game, he just doesn't have a favorite team since he's from Phoenix
so it's not high on his priority list.
I'm glad to hear the O-line is coming together a little more. I've been
screaming at them in half the games I've watched. Thank goodness I can
yell loud enough for them to hear. I'll try to make sure to catch the
Giants game and make another appearance.
Okie dokie?
Jill
|
36.1442 | re: .1441, skip church?? :-) | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Nov 12 1992 13:02 | 4 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
36.1443 | Church - #1 Priority | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Thu Nov 12 1992 14:46 | 7 |
|
Somebody has to pray for you heathens. ;') Not to mention the
Broncos. I call upon Divine Intervention alot. That's why we
have all those last minute comebacks that seem impossible.
Jill
|
36.1444 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | John 3:16 - Patriots 0:16 | Thu Nov 12 1992 15:26 | 4 |
| Be careful with these P-Name bets, a couple of upper/lower case
mistakes and you get branded a crook for life!
/Don
|
36.1445 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Thu Nov 12 1992 16:35 | 5 |
| I thought in Denver, Pile-it-High Stadium was a church??? It makes sense when
you consider the respect the refs give the hometown team. The way the folks
were orange and worship the grown BBJ walks on....
;^)
|
36.1446 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Thu Nov 12 1992 16:58 | 8 |
|
Didn't lots of churches start services early a few years back so they
would be finished before a Bronco playoff game? I think it was the AFC
Championship game in Cleveland that had a 12:30 Eeaster, 10:30 Mountain
start that "necessitated" the change of time for church services.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1447 | C'mon give'm a rest (NOT!) ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Hail to Bill Long and TcM | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:11 | 12 |
|
just a word of advice (Hey, I'm a nice guy)
Be careful with all these notes about churches, ya might make MtM
start to count again!
;^)
I remain,
willing to lend him my calculator (w/instructions)!
Kev
|
36.1448 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:12 | 5 |
|
Careful about the church talk in here before a Jints game, Jill, or
we'll bring back Reverend Jim.
|
36.1449 | Besides, Come to the stadium and see GAWD, aka Elway !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:15 | 8 |
|
TRUE... Churches in Denver and C. Springs have early services when
their regular times overlap important Bronco Games... You gotta love
it. Even the men and women of the cloth have there priorities !!
;^)
BG
|
36.1450 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:25 | 3 |
| There should be Their...
BG
|
36.1451 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:48 | 4 |
| It's a good thing you corrected that, I thought I was gonna have to
insult you're intelligence again.
Brews
|
36.1452 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Nov 12 1992 20:08 | 9 |
| I was at a game several years back and at half time they
let some kids come out to mid-field and show banners that
they made to the crowd. Two little kids unfurled theirs
THE DENVER BRONCOS LOVE LAWRENCE TAYLOR
It had everybody in stitches.
BoB
|
36.1453 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Fri Nov 13 1992 08:59 | 8 |
| Very nice to see a note by Jill. Hope all is well.
Very good discussion in here. Highly informative. Nothing repeated, no recurring
themes. Just good honest football talk.
Love it.
JD
|
36.1454 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 13 1992 11:19 | 21 |
| Glad we could make your day for ya JD...
So, an article in the paper the other day talked about how the
dumb sh*t Tommy Maddox almost got ran down by the Broncos mascot
(A Giant White Horse) while returning to the sidelines after another
turn at playing $1,000,000 a year holder on exta points and field goals.
This guy is a waste product. They did however have a stupid line in
the sports section regarding this "incident". Went some thing like
"If Tommy (the dumb sh*t) could take a hit from that horse and get up,
he can take a hit from anyone". The Denver papers are out of control,
they'll write about anything. I bet it won't be long before we find
out what kind of candy John handed out this year. I guess the point of
this note is that the Bronco "Brain Truss" (HA !) will spend a
$1,000,000 a year on an unproven girly mon like Maddox but won't cough
up the $$$ to pick up someone that would really help the team, like
Keith Jackson maybe...
BG
PS. Donks crush the Midgets by more than 10 pts
|
36.1455 | | CAMONE::WAY | Got my mojo workin' | Fri Nov 13 1992 11:27 | 17 |
| > out what kind of candy John handed out this year. I guess the point of
Oh it's scrumscious, when it crunches,
that's why John like's Nestle's Crunch
[cut to scene of John throwing a candy bar to Mrs. Ed]
Oh it's scrumscious, when it crunches,
that's why John like's Nestle's Crunch
hth,
'Saw
|
36.1456 | John Is Gawd... Midget Lose, So Does Childs !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 13 1992 13:04 | 16 |
|
Good one `Saw.... I hated that damn thing.
Actually,
I can't believe I just read this but John was quoted in the
paper as saying "I really fooled them all this year... I handed
out everything. "Snickers, Nestle's Crunch, Reeses, Suckers,
Gum, you name it."
Sick Man... I wish they'd write about something important like when
Reeves is gonna be fired...
BG
|
36.1457 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 13 1992 13:10 | 1 |
| I think BG is finally seeing the light, eh Mike C.?
|
36.1458 | I saw the light... I was a friggen train !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 13 1992 13:27 | 8 |
| Just pissing in the wind Mac... Playing both sides of the fence incase
the donks pull their usual gag while playing the NFC... ;^) Beside,
by saying how much I like the Giants, what a great team they are and
that they can't possible lose in pile-it-high I'm sure to put a major
KOD on them boys.
BG
|
36.1459 | sorry | CNTROL::CHILDS | Big Imagination, better than real life | Mon Nov 16 1992 08:42 | 7 |
|
Congrats BG and the Donks. As bias as the refs were though, it didn't matter.
The Giants with the exception of Pepper Johnson played like a dead dog. I
figured with the rest of the division loosing they'd be inspired but nope.
I shoulda went to bed...
;^
|
36.1460 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my hero & mentor | Mon Nov 16 1992 08:45 | 7 |
|
I knew the game was over when they knocked BBJ out. Giants always loose to
second string QB's. The break Thiesman's leg, "Jay Shreder" beats them, they
knock Jaworski out of a game Cunningham beats them, and the list goes on and
on....
mike
|
36.1461 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Nov 16 1992 09:04 | 20 |
| Mikey,
I wanted to tell you last week, as I've told Brews "never bet the Giants".
I watched the game with a coldly detached fascination, much as one might
watch a cat toying with a mouse, before licking it all over and then
biting its head off.
The Giants SUCKED. They proved last night that when they play a REAL team,
they just don't have it. My long dead grandmother could have run through
some of the tackling in the secondary, and it wouldn't matter who the
QB was, that read and react crap from Rust is just plain ineffective.
(btw, did anyone see Rod Rust do the Joe Walton? It was classic).
I've been trying all morning to find the words to describe Ray Handjob
bundled into his snowsuit. It was classically funny.
'Saw
|
36.1462 | YESSS!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:22 | 19 |
| Finally, an impressive win, against an NFC team, on national TV. This was
definitely the most complete game Denver has played this season. Even after
NY cut the lead to 7 midway thru the 4th and had grabbed the all-important
momentum, Denver responded with a TD drive to regain control of the game and
pretty much put it away.
The offense, the line in particular, is now past the stage of looking like an
NFL offense and is now turning into a good offense. This was the 3rd game in
a row that Denver hasn't allowed any sacks, and in the last 4 games they've
scored 27 points 3 times and 21 the other time. For comparison, Denver
averaged 12 points per game thru the first 6 games of the season. The fact
that Maddox came in and did a great job is as much a tribute to the offensive
line as it is to Maddox himself.
Elway's initial X-ray was negative and right now it sounds like he will be
playing next week.
Joe
|
36.1463 | FAids week starting! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | As the stomach churnes | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:24 | 17 |
| Mike is starting to sound more like Hal:-)
I think the broncos played a good game. No sacks, as they sacked
hoss 5x!! Green actually had a great game, but credit needs to go to
the OL. 3 weeks with no sacks!
Kragen woke up.
Any details on Biff?
Is Shawn Moore still around? I have not seen any news of him being
cut, but a friend of mine insists that he was cut.
Maddox did well though.
Tim
|
36.1464 | Doinks are awesome....(ouch, that hurts!) | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:30 | 7 |
| Looks like the doinks finally got a QB worth talking about. I was
impressed with Maddox. Maybe Reeves knows what he's doing after all?
Nahhhh! The doinks are looking real tough and the faids are gonna have
a real hard time stopping them....(just trying out BG's KoD theory..:-)
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1465 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:35 | 29 |
| >Finally, an impressive win, against an NFC team, on national TV. This was
>definitely the most complete game Denver has played this season. Even after
>NY cut the lead to 7 midway thru the 4th and had grabbed the all-important
>momentum, Denver responded with a TD drive to regain control of the game and
>pretty much put it away.
Ahem. The Giants didn't grab any momentum. They recovered a fumble,
the Donks got a little nervous, the Giants had a flash in the pan TD,
and then the Donks came back with a vicious left hook to the temple.
Believe me, as a Giants fan I felt no more excited about them pulling
within 7 as I would if they had pulled within 34. They weren't going
to do it.
>The offense, the line in particular, is now past the stage of looking like an
>NFL offense and is now turning into a good offense. This was the 3rd game in
>a row that Denver hasn't allowed any sacks, and in the last 4 games they've
>scored 27 points 3 times and 21 the other time. For comparison, Denver
>averaged 12 points per game thru the first 6 games of the season. The fact
>that Maddox came in and did a great job is as much a tribute to the offensive
>line as it is to Maddox himself.
Maddox is talented, and I compliment Reeves for some excellent play calling.
'Saw
|
36.1466 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my hero & mentor | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:54 | 7 |
|
Hey let's not get out of hand here praising the Donks' offensive line.
Although Kay did get called for tackling it was clearly a call that
the refs could have called all night. It seemed to me everytime a Giants'
pass rusher got close to the Qb he end up face first on the ground.
mike
|
36.1467 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 16 1992 11:55 | 22 |
|
> Ahem. The Giants didn't grab any momentum. They recovered a fumble,
> the Donks got a little nervous, the Giants had a flash in the pan TD,
> and then the Donks came back with a vicious left hook to the temple.
> Believe me, as a Giants fan I felt no more excited about them pulling
> within 7 as I would if they had pulled within 34. They weren't going
> to do it.
I didn't say "Denver gave away 7 points" more or less to protect myself. It
got me extremely pissed off at that point for Denver to cough up the ball
when they had played a very solid game and were in firm control at that time.
After that fumble and ensuing TD, nothing but bad thoughts were in my head.
I've seen Denver play a good game and dominate the opposition before only to
totally fall apart in a short span and lose (the 1990 game in Buffalo is
what I'm thinking of). Plus, it was exactly the kind of break NY needed to
give them some life. They're 2 TD's down, Denver is driving in good field
position eating up the clock, and suddenly you're only down by 7 with plenty
of time left.
Joe
|
36.1468 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Nov 16 1992 12:15 | 22 |
| >I didn't say "Denver gave away 7 points" more or less to protect myself. It
>got me extremely pissed off at that point for Denver to cough up the ball
>when they had played a very solid game and were in firm control at that time.
>After that fumble and ensuing TD, nothing but bad thoughts were in my head.
>I've seen Denver play a good game and dominate the opposition before only to
>totally fall apart in a short span and lose (the 1990 game in Buffalo is
>what I'm thinking of). Plus, it was exactly the kind of break NY needed to
>give them some life. They're 2 TD's down, Denver is driving in good field
>position eating up the clock, and suddenly you're only down by 7 with plenty
>of time left.
Okay, Joe, I see now.
You were coming from a Denver fan's point of view, where you've seen them
blow it.
I was coming from a Giants_Under_Ray_Handjob point of view, were I knew
that the Giants didn't have an icicles chance in Hell of pulling it out
after that TD....8^)
'Saw
|
36.1469 | Of course!!! | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Mon Nov 16 1992 13:12 | 8 |
|
I didn't even watch...I knew the game was in the bag. The Broncos
always win for my birthday, which is tomorrow. It's my yearly
present from them. I actually pray for an AFC West team to have
this weekend every year, but it doesn't always work out that way.
But hey, a win is a win.
Jill, offensive & defensive prayer coordinator ;^)
|
36.1470 | Lack of oxygen Mike | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Hey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move? | Mon Nov 16 1992 14:43 | 14 |
| Hey let's not get out of hand here praising the Donks' offensive line.
Although Kay did get called for tackling it was clearly a call that
the refs could have called all night. It seemed to me everytime a Giants'
pass rusher got close to the Qb he end up face first on the ground.
mike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not the Denver death gripe again, how about the Giants TE that lets Croel by
without even a look till after Jeff "9th tr Rookie" Hostetler is sitting
on his butt. I didn't believe you Saw' but Ray "big fat boob" made Dan look
like a real NFL coach.
Jeff
|
36.1471 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Nov 16 1992 14:55 | 20 |
| >Not the Denver death gripe again, how about the Giants TE that lets Croel by
>without even a look till after Jeff "9th tr Rookie" Hostetler is sitting
>on his butt. I didn't believe you Saw' but Ray "big fat boob" made Dan look
>like a real NFL coach.
Told ya Jeff.
Ray Handjob is about as much of an NFL coach as I am a millionaire.
He couldn't coach Pop Warner league, let alone the NFL.
The two most enjoyable moments of the game for me were when Ray Doughboy
was whining to the refs, and then yelled "Goddam it", and later when
they showed a shot of Rod Rust doing his best Joe Walton "I've almost
got it, let me shove my finger farther up there" impression......
classic,
'Saw
|
36.1472 | What a coach! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Mon Nov 16 1992 15:06 | 3 |
| And how about that Raymond Berry guy. He seems to be doing a good
job with that kid Maddox!
Denny
|
36.1473 | have been lousy since he left | FRETZ::HEISER | I jam, therefore I am | Mon Nov 16 1992 17:25 | 2 |
| I wish Berry was still in New England. At least they were competitive
then.
|
36.1474 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Mon Nov 16 1992 18:37 | 11 |
|
I don't want to jd you guys and let the excuse of being away on a
business trip to not get in, so here goes:
Congrats to the Broncos and their fans (especially Jill) on their fine
win over my men in blue. Once again they have proven that they know
how to win, when the game doesn't matter.
I'll be back in a few days to finsish up.
Brews
|
36.1475 | | DECWET::METZGER | This space being flea bombed.. | Mon Nov 16 1992 19:22 | 7 |
|
Maddox will lead the Broncos to a super bowl victory before his career in Denver
is over...John-boy will never lead them to the promised land...
You heard it here first...
Metz
|
36.1476 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Nov 17 1992 08:44 | 11 |
| Mr. Boss.
Even while away, I did come in here. I obviously missed mr. Jolmama's note
- and no one seemed to press the issue for months. I didn't read every
unseen note.
Still waiting to hear what sports you play.
(Going on a week now...)
JD
|
36.1477 | John Elway, *MY* Hero and Mentor !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 17 1992 12:17 | 29 |
|
Great Bronco Victory...
The Broncos finally played a complete game. Elway look sharp in the
first half and really distributed the ball well during the time he was
in the game. The Bronco's line is actually comming around. John may
just live through the season. I wonder if He's promised them a new car
if they can get him out alive (Elway owns 3 or 4 dealerships in
Denver). The defense did a good job against the happless Midgets.
Bronco fans shouldn't get to excited about this win. The Midgets are
a mear shaddow of their old selves and are not a competive NFC team. They
showed how inept (sp?) they are Sunday night on national TV. Hoss is
a loser... I'd rather have Simms in there than Hoss. Tommy Maddox
show signs of actually being able to play in the NFL. He's got pretty
good touch and seems to have learned to keep his cool. Saying that
Maddox will lead the Broncos to a super bowl at this point is crap.
Metz is just pissed and trying to crank up the bronco faithful. This
team is comming around. After the clinic in how not to play defense
given during last nights Monday Night game, the Broncos could be a
Contender for the AFC title. We'll see.
Childs, The Donks Win, The Donks Win, The Donks Win... It don't
matter how many qualifiers you want to put on it... The Zebras,
The Denver Death Grip, The Pike-It-High curse, Etc... The Broncos
kicked the crap outta the Happless Midgets and you're wearing the
greatest p-name of all time !! HAAAAAAAA !!! I love it !!!
BG
|
36.1478 | Hudson Elite Society Of ReadOnlyNoters JS-pres. | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:58 | 7 |
|
Geez BG, what da hail did ya do petition the HESORON to get after me?
People been walking up to me in the halls here and saying John Elway
my Hero and Mentor and chuckling....such abuse in my own building.
how much you payin' em'....
mike still smiling
|
36.1479 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 17 1992 14:03 | 14 |
| They finally shook a rather large monkey off their back.
If they can just get rid of that gorilla hanging around
their neck now.
Sorry Reeves bashers but there's no way Bolan can dump
him now.
- Mr Ed starts and calls own plays. A good move.
- Mr Ed goes down switch to unproven green qb.
Reeves shows faith and Maddox returns favor.
- Rivers fumbles at mid field setting up Giants
only td. Reeves calls Rivers' number the
clinching score.
BoB
|
36.1480 | Raiders Best in NFL... can't lose to Denver !! KOD !!!! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:09 | 15 |
|
Childs... I got connections everywhere !! ;^)
BoB... You're right on there. i don't know that once the Broncos
clinched a winning season that Bowlen could get rid of him and survive
the rath of the Denver faithful.
I have to say that the little bout with the press on his total lack of
creativity in play calling might have done him some good. That was not
the typical Reeves game plan he called after John went down. Maybe
Elway was whispering in his ear on the sidelines. I could live with a
Dan Reeves that call a game like that. Good mix, lots' of passing in
non passing situations... Got to love it !
|
36.1481 | clairification | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:11 | 4 |
| When I say clinch, I'm assuming a win against the Sea Chickens both at
home and away !!
BG
|
36.1482 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:32 | 8 |
| > - Rivers fumbles at mid field setting up Giants
> only td. Reeves calls Rivers' number the
> clinching score.
That was Lewis you're thinking of, not Rivers.
Joe
|
36.1483 | Go Donks !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Tue Nov 17 1992 16:46 | 9 |
| Right you are, Joe...
This Bronco team could make the Superbowl again this year. To
bad they won't make it past the awesome Raiders, the are the best team
in football. The only reason the Raiders are where they are is because
for the Zebras. Bad calls have kept them and their god like coach and
GM out of the superbowl.
KOD by BG
|
36.1484 | God help us, puhleeeze! | CTHQ1::LEARY | Jackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong. | Tue Nov 17 1992 16:58 | 1 |
|
|
36.1485 | So Sorry.... | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Wed Nov 18 1992 15:03 | 8 |
|
Childs,
I send my condolences. It must have been really hard for you to watch
your hero and mentor get hurt. I know you must be thrilled that it's
not serious.
Jill
|
36.1486 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Thu Nov 19 1992 10:00 | 3 |
|
thank you for your sympathy Jill. it has been tough week. thank the lord it's
almost over.....
|
36.1487 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Thu Nov 19 1992 16:51 | 6 |
| Maybe you'll think twice about betting against the MIGHTY DONKS in
the future, Mikey. I've extracted your p-name form the file and
sent it to BBJ along with the phone number you can be reached during
the day.
Jack
|
36.1488 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Nov 19 1992 21:43 | 26 |
| Anymore bets like that and we'll have Childs seriously
thinking about jumping onboard the the Bronco wagon.
Good to see your coming around and begining to become
a decent judge of horse flesh. Pardon the pun.
As far as I can recall, this is the first game Elway has
ever missed due to injury. There was the game that they
forgot to bring his knee brace then there were a few
missed due to illness.
There was a whole bunch of hitting going on out there
sunday night. Bodies were laying everywhere and the shot
of NY's lb on the sideline with the mud and blood was
classic. Smith was dishing out some hits but he got
nailed at least one good time too. I hadn't seen the
Broncos in that style of game in a long time.
Several of the Hostettler's sacks were attributed to the
pass coverage. He had the pocket and the time but no receiver.
That's been a long time coming too. Three games now without
a sack allowed! The running game seems to be coming on.
Sunday at Raiders is the big one. Everybody gets ready and
nobody looks past it. Overall it's more critical for the
Raiders but the Broncos have a great deal riding there also.
BoB
|
36.1489 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Fri Nov 20 1992 08:09 | 9 |
| If the donks play like they did against the jints, the game is in
the bag. If not, then???
Of course this will probably be the typical less than 7 point victory
for whomever wins.
Go Broncos!!!
Tim
|
36.1490 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Fri Nov 20 1992 09:31 | 11 |
|
First of all Jack, you know I'm not going to give up. Like I said earlier
I'll see you in Three Rivers or Pile it High again in the offs'.
BoB, that piece of horse flesh you're talking about more like an intestine
no guts you know what I mean? The little boy got hit a few times so he went
to the sideline. Once he threw that inty he paniced and got his butt replaced.
Biggest mistake we made was knock him out of the game. He'd have given it
back....
mike
|
36.1491 | Ouch !!! I'm gonna put the hurt on ya during the `offs | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 09:59 | 21 |
| Carloskiwitz...
You know that the Donks ca't win this game. They are totaly out
classed by your up and coming Raiders. the Raiders will be the
nexted(tm) NFL dynasty, starting this year. The raiders are the
only team in the AFC that can and will bring the Superbowl back
to the conference. Yes, there is know wat the Raiders can lose
this one at home in front of their Quiche Eat Yuppy Fans.... BTW,
Do you eat Quiche, Carloskiwitz ??? Inquiring Minds and all that
Bull S___.
Childs...
Can't wait to see ya with another p-name for the playoffs. Maybe
something like, "John Elway, The Greatest QB to ever Play", or
"John Elway, The Giant Killer" or perhaps "John Elway, I Love Him"
or maybe even "I wish I had John Elways Teeth" or even worse, "John
Elway's Wife Is A Babe". If you're man enough to wear something like
that for a week or two, I'm sure we can work something out.
BG
|
36.1492 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:00 | 3 |
| Damn... I got fat fingers today !!!
BG
|
36.1493 | | FRIDAY::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:12 | 5 |
|
It appears Sammie Smith has opted for surgery to repair his
*groin problems*. This will end his season.........
Claybroon
|
36.1494 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 10:36 | 5 |
| What's the problem, Claybroon... Does he have some torn tissue
or what. Those kinds of things usually heal all by their lonesome.
BG (Going to get the sports section)
|
36.1495 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway my Hero & Mentor | Fri Nov 20 1992 12:38 | 4 |
|
I'll be working on your p-name until then.... ;^)
Smellway three time LOOSER!!!!
|
36.1496 | | MCIS2::DHAMEL | Thing of beauty and a boy forever | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:27 | 3 |
|
There goes that damn Loose/Lose alarm again!
|
36.1497 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:31 | 4 |
| Surgery not a sure this for Sammy yet... Trade or waivers are in
his future though... Just a feeling.
BG
|
36.1498 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:10 | 2 |
|
Have the donks ever won an NFL championship?
|
36.1499 | Clowns Fans Are Really Obnoxious !! Groaner, where Ya Been | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:26 | 12 |
|
Here we go !!!
Have The Clowns ever won (in the modern era fo football) a game that
ment anything. Have the Clowns ever beat Denver to get the right to
go to a Superbowl, Have the Clowns ever been to a Superbowl (besides
sitting in the stands). Do the Clowns have a manly QB who doesn't wear
dresses... I think Not !!!
Thats all for me,
BG
|
36.1500 | browns have won and NFL championship... donks.. NOT! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:32 | 4 |
|
I've been read only for the past couple of months... too much work to do.
|
36.1501 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:33 | 3 |
|
... p.s. If everyone sends me $, I will go back to read-only.
|
36.1502 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:35 | 10 |
| it might be worth it... ;^)
How ya been anyway !!
BG
speaking of $ I still got that one I won from ya... Hanging in my
office..
|
36.1503 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Nov 20 1992 14:46 | 12 |
| Wow, guys, I hate to be a spoil sport, but in the past few notes,
we done busted up a couple of rules:
First off, you can't be talking about Bernie Kozar and
dresses any more.
Second off, you can't be soliciting $$$ in here.
(I know, I tried 8^))
You may now continue your regularly schedule Broncos-Browns debate,
'Saw
|
36.1504 | | FRETZ::HEISER | I jam, therefore I am | Fri Nov 20 1992 15:03 | 1 |
| Does Mr. Ed play QB for the Browns?
|
36.1505 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Fri Nov 20 1992 16:29 | 3 |
| Ohhhhh pretty damn original, Heiser...
BG
|
36.1506 | just curious? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Sat Nov 21 1992 11:43 | 4 |
| You've been a RON fur 2 months because your too busy? If thats the
case, then you should'nt be RON', right?
Tim
|
36.1507 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Newcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya down | Sun Nov 22 1992 17:26 | 9 |
| Judging by the firsted half, this rookie is just as adept at fouling up
the Donks offense as Mr. Ed is.
He threw the interception that set up the TD with just the right
authority, and Mr. Ed could only have been happy this guy is following
in his footsteps.
JaKe
|
36.1508 | ugly | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Mon Nov 23 1992 10:00 | 13 |
| The donks defense just can't get motivated on the road. The offense
moved the ball long enough to turn it over.
Jay had all day to throw. That was obvious since he didn't have a
pick.
Shawn Moore maybe would have done better. Then again, I don't think
it would have mattered.
Enjoy Carlos & co....At least this donk fan doesn't have to order the
bird!
Tim
|
36.1509 | There's the "Road" Broncos and the "Home" Broncos... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 23 1992 10:16 | 35 |
| Okay Carlos, you win this one. :^(
Killer loss. This one is all the worse when you consider that KC, SD,
Pittsburgh, and Luckalo all won. Heading into this 2-game road trip, I figured
Denver would lose all of their road games except at Seattle and win their 2
home games to finish at 10-6. I still think that's how they'll finish out -
whether or not that would be enough to win the division, I don't know, but
probably not.
I thought Maddox played pretty well, considering it was his first NFL start and
on the road against a very tough defense. Sure, he made a couple key mistakes,
but also showed quite a bit of composure and threw the ball pretty well. The
thing that bothered me most about him is how he just plain dropped the ball 3
times. Maybe it was jitters, but remember when he was drafted how they said he
has small hands and has trouble holding onto the ball? I'm surprised the
Faiders didn't blitz him alot more. His big mistakes were throwing the
1st-quarter pick that led to LA's first TD and the fumble in the 3rd quarter
when they were driving. The rest of the offense made their share of mistakes -
2 holding penalties that helped stall drives, Vance dropping a pass that he
should've caught for a TD, a blocked FG, and a measly 1 for 11 on 3rd downs.
Denver dominated the 3rd quarter but just couldn't get the ball in the end
zone.
Defensively, Denver played terrible in the first half. Dickerson ran for
nearly 100 yards before halftime.
For what it's worth [nothing IMO] the game was much closer than the score
indicated. There's no comparison to this loss and, say, the 30-0 shellacking
at Philly, but a loss is a loss. The big differences in this one were that LA
took advantage of their scoring opportunities while Denver did not, and the
turnovers. 3rd down conversions were also a big factor - LA converted 50% whil
Denver was 1 for 11.
Joe
|
36.1510 | AFC West is up for grabs.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Mon Nov 23 1992 10:28 | 19 |
| ___________ __________
/ / / / /
/ / / / / /
__________/ /_______/_ _____ / / /
/ / / / /
/ / / / /
/___________ / /_________/ *
Hey Big Game, that KoD stuff really works! Heh heh heh....:-)
By the way, I take it all back...the doinks sip! Maybe if that super
genious (Reeves) woulda got Bucky an OL with that #1 pick instead of
TM-jr. he wouldn't be hurt right now....not that it would've mattered
yesterday anyhow.
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1511 | KOD failed me this week. | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 23 1992 12:10 | 11 |
|
Bad loss for the Donks... Didn't get to see it since I was remodeling
the kitchen all day but did hear some on the radio... I must have been
ugly. With this loss, Denvers destiny in in the hands of outhers as
far as the playoffs coming through denver. Oh well... Good win
Carloskiwitz... The haids looked tough against the happless Donks.
One good thing, I didn't lose any money.
BG
|
36.1512 | 24-0 | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Hey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move? | Mon Nov 23 1992 17:11 | 10 |
| This game just plain sipped...
The entire defense laid back and got beat on a Franco-Harris run
for the sideline play all day.
Stoopid lose.
Seems like the loss fits with the Jeckel and Hyde season though.
Jeff
|
36.1513 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Denvers Line, Maddox, Dan Reeves | Mon Nov 23 1992 18:19 | 11 |
| The Broncos may have turned the wrong way at the turning point of
their season. With a win in L.A. they would have been the master
of their own destiny. The loss puts them at the mercy of others.
The K.C. and Luckalo games are now must wins for the Donks. Also,
the Dallas and Seachicken games will be very important to this team
if they plan on collecting post season monies for christmas. Like
I said, I didn't watch the game, only listened to it but the more
I think about this loss the more I know it could very well be the
difference between sitting at home in the post season or playing.
BG
|
36.1514 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Nov 23 1992 19:07 | 25 |
| > The K.C. and Luckalo games are now must wins for the Donks. Also,
> the Dallas and Seachicken games will be very important to this team
> if they plan on collecting post season monies for christmas. Like
> I said, I didn't watch the game, only listened to it but the more
> I think about this loss the more I know it could very well be the
> difference between sitting at home in the post season or playing.
Well, KC and Luckalo are must games depending on what you're talking about.
For Denver to get a bye in the first round or even home field throughout,
they're definitely must game. (Actually, Denver would probably have to win out
to get home field all the way). The division will most likely come down to the
final game at KC, and Denver will most likely lose that one. It would have been
nice for Denver to have the divison wrapped up going into KC but that's
unlikely now since Denver would have to be 2 games up on KC before that one
since Denver's division record will most likely be worse than KC's. But the
division title won't mean a whole hell of alot (compared to one of the wildcard
spots) unless you can get one of the byes.
I'll agree about the Dallas and (at) Seattle games being important for this
team to make the playoffs. Assuming they lose at Luckalo and KC, they'll need
the other 3 for 10-6 which will almost certainly get them in, whereas 9-7 would
be a question mark.
Joe
|
36.1515 | Ah'm in disguise! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Nov 24 1992 09:00 | 27 |
| >>>
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 36.1512 Bronco notes 1512 of 1514
OURGNG::RIGGEN "Hey Bill is chicken pluckin a good " 10 lines 23-NOV-1992 17:11
-< 24-0 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This game just plain sipped...
The entire defense laid back and got beat on a Franco-Harris run
for the sideline play all day.
Stoopid lose.
^
**** |
- ALERT!!!!!
Somebody get the loose/lose police!!!!
I remain,
Kev_for_Dickstah!
;^)
|
36.1516 | My, my, my,...hmmm, hmmm, hmmm,....well, well, well.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Nov 24 1992 09:44 | 14 |
| Geez, it seems like just a week or so ago youze guys were talking about
how great the defense was playing, the offensive line was much
improved, the running game was coming around, Bucky was Gawd, and the
doinks were just about a lock for representing the AFC in the 'Big
Dance' as Art would put it. And now you guys are talking possible
wild-card spots for the donks, or even worse, the donks possibly
sitting at home for the playoffs......
No wonder you guys hate the faiders......:-)
HtH
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1517 | You should worry about what LA's doing for the postseason... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 24 1992 10:31 | 30 |
| > Geez, it seems like just a week or so ago youze guys were talking about
> how great the defense was playing, the offensive line was much
> improved, the running game was coming around, Bucky was Gawd, and the
> doinks were just about a lock for representing the AFC in the 'Big
> Dance' as Art would put it. And now you guys are talking possible
> wild-card spots for the donks, or even worse, the donks possibly
> sitting at home for the playoffs......
Carlos, I wish you wouldn't generalize by saying "youze guys" because I never
said they were the favorite to reach Pasadena or how great the defense has been
playing. I think the defense has been a big disappointment this year, the game
against the Giants withstanding. The O-line is coming around and played decent
against the Faiders this past week - the offensive line isn't one of the main
reasons they lost.
Going into this 6-game homestretch, I expected Denver to lose at LA, Luckalo,
and KC, and win the rest to finish 10-6. So given that, the only they'd win
the division is if they go into KC with a 2-game lead, and it doesn't look like
that's gonna be the case. KC has won 3 in a row since the break and, quite
honestly, I expected them to lose *at least* 1 of the past 3. The bottom line
is, it looks like the division will come down to the last game at KC and I
don't think Denver will win that game.
Anyway, you're just saying that "we" said Denver is the favorite to take the
AFC but you know I don't think that (right now), so just single out who you're
talking about or address your notes to them. Hell, we all know who you're
talking about anyway. :^)
Joe
|
36.1518 | It's all my fault Joe... | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Nov 24 1992 12:09 | 12 |
|
Joe... you're pretty snooty about all this... Let Carloskiwitz
have his fun and don't take it personal. Deflect all the heat to
me cause "we all know who hes talking about anyway" Lighten up,
dude. You know what you write, only answer to that. I'll take car of
the rest.
Carloskiwitz, What the scoop on TM...? The Denver Post says that
he's been demoted to 3rd string QB. What gives... Did it "Snow"
in LA when we weren't looking or what?
BG
|
36.1519 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:03 | 17 |
|
> Joe... you're pretty snooty about all this... Let Carloskiwitz
> have his fun and don't take it personal. Deflect all the heat to
> me cause "we all know who hes talking about anyway" Lighten up,
> dude. You know what you write, only answer to that. I'll take car of
> the rest.
I don't think I'm being snotty (assuming that's what you meant) about this - I
just thought I'd ask Carlos if he'd be more direct about who he's talking to,
since he was referring to previous notes regarding predictions of Denver taking
the AFC. I'm not trying to take away from Carlos' fun either. It's just that
when he says "you guys", it makes it sound like we're *all* unrealistic Bronco
fans wearing orange colored glasses when you're the only one talking the note
up with these predictions.
Joe
|
36.1520 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:28 | 14 |
| Somebody pleez take the coffee mug away from Joe before he really gets
uptight and kills a million or so people at the Cinderella shopping
mall (or is that in Dallas?), and when the authorities do finally
subdue Joe, he's mumbling something about DEC's new philosophies, and
Carloskiwitz generalizing and lumping all doink fans together...:-)
BG, I don't know what the deal with TM is...I think maybe when Shredder
was benched he took it like a man and supported TM, but now that the
foot's on the other shoe, TM's proberly snivelling about it, and showing
his maturity (or lack thereof). Of course this is just speckylation on
my part, but that's what I figure is happening.
Carlitos-ski
|
36.1521 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:37 | 5 |
| �It's just that
�when he says "you guys", it makes it sound like we're *all* unrealistic Bronco
�fans wearing orange colored glasses
You mean you all aren't?
|
36.1522 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Say Goodbye George! | Tue Nov 24 1992 14:47 | 2 |
| I'll bet he ain't even painted his dawg orange yet!!
Denny
|
36.1523 | | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Tue Nov 24 1992 15:07 | 5 |
|
How could we be Mac? We've got so many *objective* noters
in here to keep us in our place! :*)
Claybroon
|
36.1524 | right off the press | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Nov 24 1992 15:41 | 25 |
|
Sorry Joe... I kinda accidently for the :^)
I ain't painted the dog yet but I did buy the paint...
It's only a matter of time.
Carlitos Ski... I was wondering, you think there might have
been an unexpected "SNOW" fall in L.A.... TM has had a record
of substance abuse in the past and I can't see Art putting up
with it (at least not during the season).
Interesting note in todays sports page. Reeves lambasted the
Bronco players say that they played the game against the Raiders
like it was a preseason game. He said he wasn't so sure that his
players even wanted to make the playoffs judging by the way they
played. He also eluded to their sorry a$$ed record on the road
as a show stopper for the up comin playoffs. You could tell he
was pissed that they got blown out on top of getting beat.
In other new... I heard Elway tried to throw again today without
success. I guess he's hurt pretty bad. He said that he thought he'd
be ready to play this week but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. They
really ought to sit him down another week.
BG
|
36.1525 | tolda he was a big sissy!!! ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dontcha miss Charlie's Angels reruns? | Tue Nov 24 1992 15:52 | 0 |
36.1526 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Nov 24 1992 15:58 | 10 |
| Childs... I was wondering what happened to ya... I don't miss
Charlies Angles reruns but I do miss your p-name from lasted(tm)
week. Elway ain't no sissy. In FACK(tm) he is one of the most
durrable QB ever to play the game. He Big, Strong and tough as
nails. Hell, 75% of the girly mon QB's in the league won't even try
to pick up a fe extra yards like our man John.
Big Bad John is #1,
BG
|
36.1527 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Newcastle Brown'll sure smack ya down | Tue Nov 24 1992 16:01 | 8 |
|
>>durrable QB ever to play the game. He Big, Strong and tough as
>>nails.
Not to mention he smells like a dead decomposing fish!!!!
JaKe
|
36.1528 | As nails that is | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Nov 24 1992 16:18 | 4 |
|
>> Elway ain't no sissy. He Big, Strong and tough as nails.
And every bit as smart.
|
36.1529 | Chevy, Apple Pie and John Elway !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Nov 24 1992 17:21 | 7 |
| Youze girls are getting on my nerves... Elway graduated from Stanford
with honors, he ain't no dummy. And Jake, any self respecting
football player always comes into game day smelling like dead
decomposing fish. Get a clue ladies... either one of the organizations
you back (footbal that is) would kill to have BBJ at the helm.
BG
|
36.1530 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Tue Nov 24 1992 19:45 | 4 |
| Elway was dumb for trying to get an extra yard on that run, which was
2nd and 9 if I remember correctly.
Start Shawn Moore!!!
|
36.1531 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 24 1992 23:54 | 18 |
| There's a number of ways you can look at that game sunday.
1. The Raiders are a far superior team than the Broncos or
any of the other 1/2 dozen or so teams that have beaten them
so far this season.
2. This is the price you pay for breaking in your future.
3. The Broncos are a far inferior team without Mr. Ed in the
saddle. Everybody (except a few) knew that anyway.
It might sound like I've been drinking out of Carlos' cup
but overall, I thought Maddox did reasonably well. He
threw 2 picks down deep but it was the int returns that
killed them. The Raiders were primed to initiate the guy
and who could blame them?
BoB
|
36.1532 | ? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Wed Nov 25 1992 10:02 | 7 |
| �It might sound like I've been drinking out of Carlos' cup
My cup?...Gee, where'n the world did you find that, I haven't seen that
since my little league days.....:-)
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1533 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 25 1992 14:50 | 10 |
| Did anybody see KC at SEattle sunday night? The Seahawks have
the worst record in the league right now. Time and time again
their qb blew it big time. This guy ( and I can't recall his name)
could make Todd M. look good. Seattle showed an overall decent
defense and the new back Warren following J.L's blocks looked
very painfull. Monday night with a home crowd against the Broncos
could prove interesting. There is probably nothing Seattle likes
doing more than beating Denver.
BoB
|
36.1534 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Wed Nov 25 1992 14:59 | 3 |
|
I saw the remaining MNF sched yesterday, and they all look like pretty
bad games.
|
36.1535 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Nov 25 1992 15:01 | 4 |
| Funny thing about any given game is you never can tell
what's going to be good or bad.
BoB
|
36.1536 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Wed Nov 25 1992 15:07 | 9 |
| re- MNF, I agree Bob, There haven't been to many good MN games
this year. This past one was billed to be great, but it was boring
and a romp.
Next weeks will probably be good to watch.
Watch for Denver to have to pull it out in the 4th.
Tim
|
36.1537 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Nov 25 1992 15:11 | 9 |
| Bob,
The Seattle QB was named Kelly Stouffer. I know, because I knocked him
on his butt in a bar in Federal Way.
Ask JD....
'Saw
|
36.1538 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Wed Nov 25 1992 15:12 | 2 |
|
Really, `Saw ?!?!? Please elaborate.
|
36.1539 | Ugh! | CSC32::KINSELLA | it's just a wheen o' blethers | Wed Nov 25 1992 17:48 | 7 |
|
Too bad my birthday isn't every weekend. Boo Hoo...
Angonizing game. I watch every grueling second of it.
I just don't understand why the D even bothered to suit
up...they certainly didn't show up.
Jill
|
36.1540 | Home for the Holidays too huh? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | BeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySin | Tue Dec 01 1992 06:29 | 11 |
| Heh heh heh......the doinks almost pulled off a major upset of the
powerful seahawks in O.T......:-)
And with the Cowboys, Bills, and again the powerful seahawks, and
lastly the Chiefs left on the doinks schedule, they'll be lucky to be
at .500 when it's all over.
HtH
Carloskiwitz
|
36.1541 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 01 1992 08:49 | 3 |
|
Donks and all TM's Sip......
|
36.1542 | real busy but had to comment on this debachle | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 01 1992 09:28 | 7 |
|
HA !!! What a friggen joke !!! Typical Dan Reeves %^&%^^$%&
football. Oh well, Seasons over, donks stay home for the holidays.
Bet they get their asses kick real bad at home by Dallas next week.
BG
|
36.1543 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 01 1992 09:56 | 4 |
| As devastating as a loss can get. No way in hell they should've lost
that one, but somehow found a way.
Joe
|
36.1544 | P U | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Tue Dec 01 1992 10:40 | 10 |
|
That one really hurt. Carlos is right. They'll be home
for the Holidays.
I hope #31 gets his walking papers today. He's not the
sole reason they lost but he sure helped in a big way.
He's lucky they didn't tack another 15 yards onto that
facemask penalty for slugging that Seahawk......
Claybroon
|
36.1545 | Hey Carlos maybe we cain trade Toad for Tommy Gun ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Hey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move? | Tue Dec 01 1992 10:43 | 12 |
| Denver played the worst game of the season last night.
nexted to the Philadelphia
nexted to the Washington
nexted to the Raider
lets just say the entire team sipped last night and I am very happy that I only
watched the perfect Mark Jackson TD catch...
Jeff
|
36.1546 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 01 1992 11:19 | 35 |
| If ever a game epitomized Denver's lack of a killer instinct, this was it. I'm
still shocked that they managed to lose this game. For the first time since
who knows when, I felt Denver was in total control of a game away from home.
About the only thing that would get Seattle back into the game in the 4th
quarter would be a turnover, but even after Marshall coughed up the ball on a
punt return the 'Hawks still couldn't manage any points.
Denver's offense was nonexistent after the first quarter, although they were
dealing with terrible field position for much of the game. It probably won't
be mentioned much, but Seattle's punter deserves alot of the credit for this
win. Reeves opened the game with some aggressive play-calling, but went
conservative after Maddox threw an interception on a short, routine pass in
the flat that was almost returned for a TD. The other factor that made Reeves
go conservative was Denver's constant poor field position.
One thing you have to wonder about is why Reeves didn't go to Shawn Moore when
the offense went flat in the latter stages of the game. Here's a guy who
probably would've done well against Seattle's aggressive d-line with his
running ability. Nobody asked Reeves after the game why he didn't do this, but
his response would've been that they have confidence in Maddox and he is their
QB of the future and needs to be in a situation like this and learn. I'll
agree with that, but this wasn't the time to be giving the guy experience or
learning time. The bottom line is this team is (or at least was) very much in
the hunt for a playoff berth and they desperately needed a win last night,
regardless of how the hell they got it. The single biggest element in Seattle
coming back to tie the game was them changing QB's.
Nevertheless, Denver had numerous opportunities to put this game away and just
didn't do it. The biggest play down the stretch was probably the face-mask on
the punt return that gave Seattle the ball at the Denver 30.
Joe
|
36.1547 | | WKRP::LEETCH | US Messaging Practice DTN 432-7628 | Tue Dec 01 1992 11:42 | 7 |
| Re: MNF
What happened? I went to bed after Seattle couldn't score after the 4th quarter
fumbled punt and trailing 13-3. Seattle's offense had looked completely
pathetic. Driving to work this AM I hear Seattle won 16-13.
Bruce
|
36.1548 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Getting back in touch. | Tue Dec 01 1992 11:59 | 1 |
| Too funny.
|
36.1549 | Donks SIp BIGTIME!! | PFSVAX::JACOB | Car Accidents are a pain in the neck | Tue Dec 01 1992 12:13 | 9 |
| I guess that'll teach ya to go to bed early, eh????
Seattle "manhandled" the Donks, as the Donks snorted a whole big pile
of Seachicken SLOF's lasted night.
The Steeler's should keel the Seachickens!!!!!
JaKe
|
36.1550 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Dec 01 1992 14:54 | 9 |
| Dierdorf kept saying it last night, "Denver keeps trying to
lose the game ...."
If he said it once, he said it five times.
I thought Denver tried hard to lose and Seattle looked like
a bunch of Keystone Kops.
Scott
|
36.1551 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:02 | 7 |
| I thought the SeaHawks were bad a few years ago when I went to the
hawks-Browns game in teh 'dome with Chainsaw. Remember that 'exciting'
game Frank.
But this edition is pathetic. They look like a PAC10 team. ;-0
JD
|
36.1552 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboro | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:08 | 4 |
| Actually the SeaChickens are about as offensively exciting as
a Little Ten school...
/Don
|
36.1553 | | NWD002::JOLMAMA | I'm a Romper Room DO BEE. | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:20 | 6 |
| But what about the SeaHawk defense? Don't hear much Bronko babble on
this matter?
I agree with JD, the PAC10 teams are close to the NFL!
Matt the Mariner
|
36.1554 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:30 | 13 |
| Matt -
given the problems the Huskies have had wif drugs and everything (along
wif other Pac10 schools), they do seem like the NFL. Glad to see you
back in here after the Dawgs were exposed for the pretenders that they were.
Caint wait for them to play a main's schedule...
And are the Pac10 defenses overrated? After all, USC had a top defense
against the run, and Notre Dame went through them like a hot knife through
Shedd's Spread....
JD
|
36.1555 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:38 | 17 |
| > Dierdorf kept saying it last night, "Denver keeps trying to
> lose the game ...."
>
> If he said it once, he said it five times.
That's what I can't stand about Dierdork - the way he overemphasizes his
points. He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses, but the way he
drags on about something is extremely irritating. A typical Dierdork analysis
might go something like this (read at about half your normal reading speed to
get the true effect): "WHAT - AN - *INCREDIBLE* - COACHING - DECISION - BY -
MR. - SHULA. - *THAT*, - LADIES - AND - GENTLEMEN, - IS - AN - EXCELLENT -
EXAMPLE - OF - WHY - DON - SHULA - IS - ONE - OF - THE - GREATEST - COACHES
- IN - THE - HISTORY - OF - THE - NATIONAL - FOOTBALL - LEAGUE." Now he
proceeds to talk about Don Shula for the next 10 minutes.
Joe
|
36.1556 | What is the story with next years draft ????? | DEVOTN::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:43 | 5 |
| The Seachickens blew there #1 pick by dropping the donks last night.
There now tied with NE, the only other team that seattle beat so NE
now holds the #1 pick in next years (if)Draft. So I guess the only
teams the Seahawks can beat is Denver and New England :-)...
MaB
|
36.1557 | | DECWET::CROUCH | Living example of God's bad taste | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:56 | 13 |
| Last night's game was the most pathetic, inept, futile effort I've
ever seen in the NFL. Stouffer is without a doubt the worst starting
QB in the league. He can't read a defense, he doesn't get rid of
the ball, he has no clue when he's about to get sacked, he's immobile,
and he's injury-prone.
I was bummed that the SeaChokes pulled it out. But, they won't win
again this year. If NE wins one more, the Chokes have the #1 pick
wrapped up. And, they had better take Drew Bledsoe. The only worse
QB in the league than Stouffer is the Chokes' backup, Dan McGwire,
who's about as mobile as an apartment building.
Pete
|
36.1558 | | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:07 | 8 |
| re. Seahawk's D
They played very well last night.......against a 21 year old
rookie QB. However, I'd love to have Kennedy and Porter in
an orange uniform.
Claybroon
|
36.1559 | | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | DEC = Wang Version 2.0 | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:12 | 13 |
| re .1557:
Pete, don't sweat it if the Seahawks end up with the 2nd overall pick
behind New England, the Pats will find a way to blow it and you'll get
the guy you want. :-)
Another noter here who saw just the first quarter, figured the Broncos
would roll, and woke up this morning very surprised at the outcome.
Had to make sure it was the first of December and not of April...
py
|
36.1560 | ulgy, uglyr to ugliest! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | BG + Carlos=KOD nausea | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:51 | 21 |
| What is Reeves thinking when he is calling the plays? I agree that
Shawn Moore shoulda been playing, but I've said that all season (only
when Biffy can't play)... TM2 kept advertising whom he was throwing
to. Thats why he is getting picked on the LEFT side!!
At the end of regulation (seattles last poss, the prevent defense?!?!
Prevent from winning defense that is!!!
The donks definetly don't deserve to go to the playoffs if they can't
beat the sorry 'hawks!! I say put collie to pasture and let Wade
Phillips or a real offensive coord take the head position. Can't be
any worse at play calling.
At least Atwater finally had a decent game.
I hope Elway is back for the cowgirls. If so, he will be rusty,
but he can't be any worse than we have seen the last 2 weeks.
Tim
|
36.1561 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:56 | 3 |
|
Woe is me. The Donks fans suffer another humiliating defeat. During
the regular season no less. Let me slit my wrists.
|
36.1562 | Go length wise it's quicker... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:00 | 10 |
|
Heres the razor... :-}
------------
| |
------------
|
36.1563 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Reeves and play calling don't mix | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:09 | 1 |
| Isn't commiting suicide at work against policy?
|
36.1564 | Talk about bad football.... | BALBOA::PUGH | | Tue Dec 01 1992 17:27 | 11 |
| On behalf of all Charger players, coaches, their wives, fans, and
anybody else who cares, I want to personally thank the Donks for a
fabulous effort last night. Based on what I saw in the 1st quarter,
I too figured this was a slam dunk win for the Donksters. Then I
turned the TV back on in the 4th quarter and got an early XMAS
present!
Doug
P.S. The SeaClucks are a sorry lot, but that Kennedy is a real man!
|
36.1565 | A Dork is a Dork of course of course | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 01 1992 18:16 | 15 |
| >That's what I can't stand about Dierdork - the way he overemphasizes his
>points. He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses, but the way he
>drags on about something is extremely irritating.
I agree with you on everything you said except..
>He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses.
It seems like half the time he's wrong and the other half he says things
that my 2 year son can figure out. DorkDork has got to be the worst
prime time color analyst I've ever heard.
Give me Dave Logan anyday .. please.
Keith
|
36.1566 | | DECWET::CROUCH | Living example of God's bad taste | Tue Dec 01 1992 18:32 | 12 |
| re .1559
Paul, I must admit I turned it off in the third quarter. Hell, the
Chokes can barely score once a game, much less twice in a little over
a quarter. I turned it back on to catch the OT. You should hear the
radio call in shows here in Seattle. Long-suffering fans are wetting
their pants over the win. Hey, folks. The 'hawks still have the worst
offense IN THE HISTORY OF THE FRIGGIN' NFL!!! They're averaging 7
lousy points a game. Last night was either their best or second best
offensive output of the year.
Pete (long-suffering Seattle sports fan)
|
36.1567 | Cowboys vs Broncos | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Dec 01 1992 23:14 | 8 |
| This game was not bad. It was horrible. That was about the
sorriest excuse for a football game witnessed lately.
It felt like it took about 6.5 hours to complete with little
to no entertainment value. As bad as it might be, there is
one thing that can turn the season around. Beat Dallas on
sunday and all will be right with the world again. Maybe.
BoB
|
36.1568 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've got three knees!! | Wed Dec 02 1992 00:58 | 1 |
| It's possible. The cowboys have never faired well in Denver.
|
36.1569 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Wed Dec 02 1992 09:16 | 14 |
| Pete -
Without a doubt, Monday's game rivaled the epic Giants/Cardinals OT Monday Night
Thriller (I believe ending in a 20-20 tie) of many moons ago. Neil O'Donahue missed
4 field goals, including 2 or 3 in OT in that game.
Cheer up. YOu could still gave Ground Chuck as coach, and the Hawks would play
just well enought to be in the playoff hunt...
Maybe they can do a nice rebuilding job. Kennedy is a damn fine ball player. A
Bledsoe would be a great pickup - and even if the Pats do get #1, I doubt they
would draft a QB #1.
JD
|
36.1570 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Wed Dec 02 1992 09:19 | 9 |
| JD,
I was thinking about that Giants/Cardinals classic as OT was winding
down. Last tie in the NFL was November 1989. Both teams on Monday night
deserved to lose; since that is not possible an badly played tie would
have been most appropriate.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1571 | John Elway exposed again | CNTROL::CHILDS | Karoke Hockey catch the fever! | Wed Dec 02 1992 09:20 | 8 |
|
Speaking of Bif, what a girly-mon out with a bad tendon? Give me a break..
How many countless stories have we heard of real men playing with broken
bones etc? Not Bif though. My theory is that he knew the begining of the
season was shear luck and now the fiddler has to be payed. He ducked out
while he could....
mike
|
36.1572 | | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Wed Dec 02 1992 09:47 | 7 |
|
Aw come on MikeyC. Quit trying to imitate Hoot. :*)
Tommy, aren't you a Pats fan? I guess you're suffering
more than us so you're allowed........
Claybroon
|
36.1573 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Wed Dec 02 1992 10:10 | 17 |
|
>> Tommy, aren't you a Pats fan? I guess you're suffering
>> more than us so you're allowed........
Yes Claybroon, I am a Pats fan. However, my suffering was over
at about week four of the season when I resigned myself to the
fact that this year's team stinks. I can still get excited about
things like the semi-emergence of Scott Zolak and John Vaughn or
the Pro Bowl calibre of play of Vincent Brown but my expectations
ain't all that high. Donks fans on the other hand will die a thou-
sand deaths before this season is over and then another thousand
in the off-season rehashing what might have been and what went wrong
and I must admit I take some pleasure in that. That's just the kind
of sicko I am.
_Tommy
|
36.1574 | | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Wed Dec 02 1992 10:39 | 4 |
|
I see. In other words, misery loves company. :*) Enjoy!
Claybroon
|
36.1575 | only Denver will do | NWD002::JOLMAMA | I'm a Romper Room DO BEE. | Wed Dec 02 1992 15:20 | 8 |
| The joy in Seattle is not based upon the belief that the Hawks have
turned the corner. It is because Seattle, the worst team in the NFL,
embarrased the despised Donkos, in prime time, in an utterly inglorious,
and amateurish manner. No other victory could be as sweet.
Still in a state of bliss,
Matt the Mariner
|
36.1576 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Dec 02 1992 16:56 | 9 |
|
Well, it always has been said that ignorance is bliss.
It's still reassuring that SEattle knows they
havn't turned the corner. At least they have some grip on
reality.
Anybody know when the last time Dallas played at Denver?
I think it has been less than 4 years.
BoB
|
36.1577 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Dec 02 1992 17:13 | 5 |
| Dallas last played at Denver in 1986 and the Broncos won by a score of
29-14 (I think!). Denver hasn't played at Dallas in the regular season
in quite a while - '77 might be the last time.
Joe
|
36.1578 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Dec 03 1992 08:59 | 12 |
| JD,
I could never forget that game or our two "home boys" from Vancouver.
The thing I could not get over about the MNF game was when the Seahawks
put in Gelbaugh, it was like a completely and radically different team.
Stouffer shoulda stayed on his butt in that bar, eh, JD?
'Saw
|
36.1579 | Tell me this isn't true, pleaseeeeeee | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Reeves and play calling don't mix | Thu Dec 03 1992 09:49 | 14 |
| I hope this is a joke! Reeves stated that if Elway isn't ready to
go, that he would do a 2 QB rotation every other play.
If its really in his thick head to do something like that, then it
just tells me that he doesn't have the gonads to admit he should of
played Shawn Moore instead of Maddox these past 2 weeks, plus he is
worried about TM2's feelings. Give me a break!
I wanted to hurl when seeing that.
Of course Dallas was the last team to do this, and if he does go
with it, Dallas will eat them alive IMO.
Tim
|
36.1580 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:42 | 19 |
|
My money says that Reeves ain't coaching the Broncos next year
if he pulls a stunt like that. Hell, he might not be there
anyway if what you read in the local rag is true.
Heard on the way into work this morning that Elway is out for this
weeks game after seeing the doctor. Man, that hit he took just
didn't look that bad... John's getting old and it's taking him a
lot longer to heal than it used to.
Tim, As far as the rotation of the QB goes... it don't matter,
the season is done. Denver will have to win 3 of the last 4 to
have a shot at getting the snot kicked out of them in the playoffs
and we know that aint gonna happen without a healthy Elway !
BG
|
36.1581 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Reeves and play calling don't mix | Fri Dec 04 1992 19:26 | 4 |
| This weekends game might end up looking like a road game if ya know
what I mean!
Tim
|
36.1582 | Not as bad as its potetential. | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Reeves and play calling don't mix | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:50 | 27 |
| Turnovers killed the donks yesterday. Reeves finally calls a good
offensive game plan (except the QB rotation), and Maddox gives the ball
up 5x, and 4 of those were critical. 1 was a hail mary at half. It
was 14-0 within the 1st 5 mins (Dallas). The donks hung in there and
actually had the lead at one point.
I thought the donks overall played a great game despite losing to the
supposed best team in the NFL.
The defense shut down Emmit from running for the most part. Sloppy
tackling on dump passes hurt the defense.
No turnovers went towards denver. The had 1 chance for TO, but
Aikman was able to grab the ball back before Kragen got his paws on
it.
Maddox showed yesterday that he has the potential, but still is not
ready. His IMO is killing denver with his turnovers. Yes Biff does to
at times, but not at the rate TM2 does.
Shawn Moore started slow, but came along just fine for not being able
to get in the rythm.
Next game is Saturday I beleive. Buffalo isn't looking real
impressive, so that means they may wake up, but who knows.
Tim
|
36.1583 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Dec 07 1992 09:53 | 22 |
| > I thought the donks overall played a great game despite losing to the
> supposed best team in the NFL.
For my money, I still think that San Fran is better than Dallas. More
weapons. But I'd say Dallas is running a close #2.
Randy Cross, calling the Giants game, kept saying how Dallas had such
great team speed. That's very important.
> Next game is Saturday I beleive. Buffalo isn't looking real
> impressive, so that means they may wake up, but who knows.
OJ was saying how it takes Buffalo a few games to get out of a slump,
so you might just have a chance.
Kelly looked terrible late in yesterday's game....
'Saw
|
36.1584 | | NWD002::JOLMAMA | I'm a Romper Room DO BEE. | Mon Dec 07 1992 11:19 | 3 |
| Dandy Don, you are needed in Denver. Croon that old tune of yours
'turn out the lights, the party's over'.
|
36.1585 | Playoffs are looking bleaker by the week | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Dec 07 1992 11:46 | 27 |
| Pretty good game - Denver did much better than most people thought they
would, especially after getting down 14-0 very quickly. And if someone
would've said before the game that Denver would turn the ball over 5
times and Dallas none, nobody would've given them a chance.
I can't believe Reeves actually went thru with the QB rotation deal.
Definitely one of the stranger things I've ever seen in a football
game. It turned out pretty good however, but I still think it's better
to have one guy in there running the offense so he can get into the
flow of the game.
Defense played a good game, but for the 2nd week in a row they couldn't
hold the opposition on the final drive.
I liked the way Vance to motioning to the crowd by pointing to Maddox
after Vance scored a TD. He was basically saying, hey, quit booing
this guy and give him some credit. However, I think most of the boos
weren't really directed at Maddox, but just at the fact that he was
playing instead of Moore.
Denver definitely needs to win one of their 2 road game to have a shot
at the playoffs now. You figure if the Jets can win at Luckalo just
about anybody can - but I have hardly any confidence in this Bronco
team on the road.
Joe
|
36.1586 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:13 | 0 |
36.1587 | Help we've fallen and can't get up | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:19 | 8 |
| Not even the mile high majic could pull this rabbit out of the hat.
Hey Dan Reeves is Shannon Sharpe only a blocker. I know Clarence Kay has
dropped a few passes this season does that make him ineligable.
I liked the rotation piece I wouldn't mind seeing more of that type of offense.
Jeff
|
36.1588 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I must not think Bad Thoughts | Tue Dec 08 1992 12:12 | 1 |
| So I hear BBJ (Big Baby John) plans to sit out another..what a wuss....
|
36.1589 | Sure it hurts.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Wed Dec 09 1992 07:37 | 20 |
| �So I hear BBJ (Big Baby John) plans to sit out another..what a
�wuss....
Couldn't agree any futha. Maybe somebody else seen it better than I
did, but the hit that the alleged 'Big Bad John' took by the Giant
defenders didn't at all look like it could cause a season ending
injury, heck, I'd bet my 86 year old grandma could've taken that hit
and not be whining as much. I think the real troof is that Bucky's
involved in some sorta conspiracy; He knows that Reeves head is on the
platter, and going from an almost sure shot at the playoffs to being
home for the holidays might just be the straw that broke the donkeys
back so to speak.....in a couple of more weeks the Denver media, and
the fans will be screaming for Danny-boys head....which in turn would
leave the door wide open for Bucky's buddy (everybody knows they're
close friends...how close I don't know....but we've seen Bucky's wife
too...) Shanahan, to come waltzing back as Reeves' replacement....
:-)
Carloski
|
36.1590 | shredder sips son | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Wed Dec 09 1992 13:12 | 19 |
| Fans have wanted Reeves' head for awhile now. Most of the media is
already blasting him.
As to Biffy, you know that he has to be about %100 to throw those 5
yard drill balls or especially those 50 yard cross field balls, so if
hes at %50 or whatever, then you know that
playing him would just cause more int's. Then again, it can't be
worse than TM2.
I also didn't think the hit that he took was that bad looking, but I
see people end up with those deep bruises that last for 1-2 months just
by "nipping" into a table or chair as they walk by. If you think
about it, the hit that Bo took on his hip wasn't that rough looking and
look what happened to him. Those kinda hits happen in every game.
Some say he may not play again this year. I disagree, but we will
see. He won't play this sat.
Tim
|
36.1591 | Pay is the SAME | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Thu Dec 10 1992 15:21 | 7 |
| I think BBJ found out that if your hurt you get paid the same as you do if
you play. Seems that this is a easy early season Vacation.
I would love to see this rotation thang with TM and BBJ Denver needs a good
play fake and TM cain do that but if they need 10 on 3rd down BBJ has about as
many weapons as Randall C. To make that type of magic work.
Jeff
|
36.1592 | pre-game capsule | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Fri Dec 11 1992 09:21 | 47 |
| Taken off the internet:
Saturday, Dec. 12
Denver (7-6) at Buffalo (9-4)
Favorite -- Buffalo by 14.
Turf -- Artificial.
Rankings -- Denver: 24th on offense, 22nd rushing, 20th
passing. 24th
on defense, 23rd rushing 23rd passing. Buffalo: 2nd on offense, 2nd
rushing, 4th passing. 12th on defense, 4th rushing, 22nd passing.
Broncos -- This will be the 500th game in franchise history and
the
Broncos could have picked a better place to play it. Without QB John
Elway, who has an injured shoulder tendon, Dener is 0-3. The Broncos
came close to upsetting Dalla last week with Tommy Maddox and Shawn
Moore alternating plays at QB. Even when playing, Elway has not had not
had the best of seasons despite leading three late rallies that have
kept Denver in the playoff picture.
Bills -- Buffalo can clinch a playoff spot with a win, but the
Bills
have managed to lose their last two. The Bills have two home losses for
the first time since 1989. They have not lost as many as three home
games since 1987. Offense has sputtered of late, but QB Jim Kelly still
leads the league in TD passes (22) and RB Thurman Thoma is second in
the AFC with 1,155 rushing yards. S Henry Jones leads the NFL with
eight interceptions.
Keys to the Game -- In last year's AFC title game, Denver
stayed close
by putting pressure on Kelly and disrupting him all day. The Bills did
not score an offensive touchdown in that game. Denver must have more of
the same, much more.
Head-to-head -- Buffalo leads, 16-10-1, winning their last
meeting
which came in last season's AFC championship game.
Streaks -- For the second time this season, Buffalo is facing a
three-
game losing streak if it falls to Denver. The Bills have had only one
such losing streak in the last five years.
HtH...
Carloski
|
36.1593 | Donks By 27 ! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Fri Dec 11 1992 17:49 | 6 |
|
Donks should win this game... No question that this Denver team
out classes the slobs from Luckalo. Look for Jim Kelly to have his
Tutu on this weekend... Dancing with Lofton on the side lines !
Bg
|
36.1594 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Sat Dec 12 1992 20:21 | 6 |
| re: .1593
Get thee to the Crow note - quickly!
The Crazy Met
|
36.1595 | To the Crow note indeed! | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've Got Three Knees!! | Sat Dec 12 1992 22:39 | 4 |
| Denver plays well at home but on the road they stink. I can smell em
all the way over here in Albuquerque! Phew!!
I hope your hungry :^)
|
36.1596 | No Elway = no wins | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Mon Dec 14 1992 09:33 | 16 |
| Did maddox and moore change jersey's on the flight to luckalo or
what? So much for my thoughts of moore being better than maddox. He
had 5 turnovers which the bills didn't turn any off them into points,
but still stopped denver from getting into a "swing".
As usual, denvers defense croaks at the end of the game, but then
again the offense croaked the 1st half.
Denver is still in the hunt for a wildcard, but is unlikely to get
one.
Seattle almost beat the iggles yesterday, so this seachicken team is
primed to upset again. they had 10 sacks on the leaper yesterday.
most impressive!
Tim
|
36.1597 | Should be AFC Weak not West.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Mon Dec 14 1992 12:17 | 8 |
| � -< No Elway = no wins >-
Is Elway the only one on the team or what????
Four of the five AFC West teams have gone on (at least) a 4 game losing
streak this year......
Carloski
|
36.1598 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Mon Dec 14 1992 12:25 | 14 |
| Of course Elway isn't the only guy on the team, its just that the QB
rotation has turned the ball over 5x each in the last 2 games, and had
critical turnovers that they(he) couldn't overcome the previous 2
games before that (seattle, la).
You know how it is when your team doesn't have a good QB Carlos!
If Shredhead is presured tonight, then the faids will lose. If he has
good protection, then they stand a good chance to win, though you know
I would rather see the fish win!
HTH
Tim
|
36.1599 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Mon Dec 14 1992 15:31 | 5 |
| Speaking of Bucky, he says that 'there's no question' he'll be ready to
play nexted weekend against the suddenly tough seahawks.
CG
|
36.1600 | too little, too late | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Mon Dec 14 1992 16:00 | 1 |
| Seems like the Seahawks always put together late-season strings.
|
36.1601 | | DECWET::METZGER | This space being flea bombed.. | Mon Dec 14 1992 16:16 | 12 |
|
the only tough thing about the chickenhawks is the defense...the offense only
managed 87 yards in 5 quarters yesterday. The defense recorded 89 yards in QB
sacks..
All you need to do is kick one field goal and then sit on the ball and not
let the defense get a big turnover for points....
Chickenhawks ain't tough....
Metz
|
36.1602 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Mon Dec 14 1992 17:36 | 8 |
| re-1 That means the iggles ain't tough either?
Denver will win this game with or without Biff....
Why do I say that, 'cause its in Denver and the donks very rarely
lose 2 home games in a row. Elway will be a plus no doubt about it!
Tim
|
36.1603 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Dec 14 1992 18:24 | 6 |
|
It's interesting that the Broncos are scoring more points now than when
Elway was in at QB. Of course, there're alot more turnovers too.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.1604 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Tue Dec 15 1992 09:47 | 9 |
| Good point Glenn.
When Elway started the jets & jints, they scored 27 in both I
beleive. The 1st 2 games without biff weren't that great,
0 at la and what 10 or 13 at seattle? Actually, in the last 4 games,
I think that all the defenses that they went up against were ranked
within the top 10 of the NFL.
Tim
|
36.1605 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 15 1992 10:29 | 7 |
| Well, the playoffs are all but out of the question at this point.
If SD or KC wins this week, Denver can't win the division. For a
wildcard, they'll need a loss by Houston, which is very probable since
the Oilers play Cleveland and Luckalo. The biggest hurdle for Denver
right now will be winning in KC.
Joe
|
36.1606 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Tue Dec 15 1992 11:56 | 2 |
| The biggest hurdle is for Denver to win this weekend, which I think
they will!!
|
36.1607 | Playoffs | ROCK::MURPHY | | Wed Dec 16 1992 13:32 | 13 |
| Comment on this...
IF (big if) Denver wins their last two, they make the playoffs if Houston loses
either game or if KC loses to the Giants, or if SD loses both, or if Miami
loses two.
I think one of the support scenarios will occur, so if Denver can win out they
can get into the wildcard games, but will have to play on the road three
times - no chance. But at least they get one extra game.
What is Elway's status?
Murph
|
36.1608 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Wed Dec 16 1992 14:47 | 3 |
| Elway will reportedly play in this weeks game.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1609 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Wed Dec 16 1992 18:44 | 11 |
|
Elway will play... However, there is still no "official" line
on the game. Looks like the bookies are waiting to see if its really
true. Denver will be at leasta 7 pt fav. if John starts. Look for
3 (homefield) if he doesn't go. The Donks may make the `offs but
playing on the road they won't go far. I would love to see them get
to take a bite outta the Fish before they go down though. The KC
game is going to be the factor that allows the donks into the `offs.
The seachicken are a mail in with BBJ back !!
BG
|
36.1610 | Go Seachickens!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway NFL Baby of the Year Winner | Thu Dec 17 1992 09:25 | 5 |
| Looks like Big Baby will start this week. High dramatics as always with this
baby. Figures he'll look like a savior if he can lead his team to two late
victories. What a sham!!!
mike
|
36.1611 | | GENRAL::WADE | His hair was perfect... | Thu Dec 17 1992 10:22 | 7 |
|
Forget about Elway coming back for a moment.....
The biggest news out of Denver is that the barrel man is
retiring after this Sunday!
Claybroon
|
36.1612 | He is naked under that? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 10:51 | 23 |
| I hear ya Claybroon, he's been wearin' that thing for 15 years!?
I guess that heart attack thathe had 1-2 years ago did him in, 'cause
it couldn't be all that cold weather and snow^)
I hear that Wymon has finally be benched, mainly do to his injury,
now the problem is they put in Dimry. He isn't that much better if at
all. Li lo Lang will also see action which is good.
Shane Dronnett will start for Brian Sochia.
Cedric Tillman will start for the Vance. I guess Vance is hurt again!
Micheal Young was called back, but said no thanks Danny. I'm not in
the football spirit and don't want to play for you. That was somewhat
of a shock when they let him go a few weeks back.
The line is 8 1/2 for the game Cacti....
Will Reeves be back. Alot of speculation going on around that...
Tim
|
36.1613 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Thu Dec 17 1992 11:26 | 3 |
| The barrel man ????......huh? What's that mean?
CG
|
36.1614 | Elway to start | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 17 1992 12:20 | 12 |
| From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc
Subject: Sports Digest
Date: 14/15/16 Dec 92
Broncos: Quarterback John Elway will play Sunday against Seattle, returning
after sitting out four losses with a bruised right shoulder.
The Broncos enter the game against the Seahawks with a 7-7 record, one
game behind the Houston Oilers for a wild-card berth. In the AFC West
race, the Broncos are two games behind co-leaders Kansas City and San
Diego. Elway threw approximately 150 passes Monday and said he has
regained most of the strength in his shoulder.
|
36.1615 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 13:00 | 15 |
| I saw something on the supposed last wildcard birth,
and that is, if (big if) the oilers lose one of their last 2 games and
the donks win both of theirs, then they are in no matter what the
other hopeful do. This is assuming the fish and chargers win at least
one of their remaining games.
The donks win the tie breaker between indy, spots and oilers...
Can the donks win both of their last? Hard to say, but anything is
possible. I don't think they will, but what the heck, heres to hoping
they do!!
Tim
|
36.1616 | Hip Hip Horray | CNTROL::CHILDS | John Elway NFL Baby of the Year Winner | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:53 | 2 |
| and here's to hoping that they don't!!!
|
36.1617 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Thu Dec 17 1992 16:20 | 2 |
| I'm sure you are hoping they don't, 'cause they might hurt your
stellers;^)
|
36.1618 | BBH (Big Baby Hoss) is back for Midgets | ROCK::MURPHY | | Fri Dec 18 1992 16:41 | 4 |
| If the Giants can take out the Chiefs this weekend, they will clinch the
Broncos a spot (WHEN Denver wins the last two)
Murph
|
36.1619 | Uh-Oh.. | WLW::TURCOTTE | Thanksgiving for every wrong move | Fri Dec 18 1992 16:49 | 5 |
|
If youse is countin on the jints, for a clinch, youse is in worse shape
than you know.
Turk
|
36.1620 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Mon Dec 21 1992 12:04 | 22 |
| Well I'd never thought I'd be saying this, but I'll be rooting for
the Donks to beat the hail out of the Chiefs next week to git into
the playoffs ( not as champeens tho, go SD!). Why you ask? Not because
I'm suddenly enamored with the Broncos, but I'm sick of watching what
used to be my fav team ( KC) do the Jekyll and Hyde thang.
I don't want to see the Chiefs in the playoffs at all. No flippin'
cojones. Take this team away from Arrowhead, and they're as timid as
a titmouse. Go back to Clevescum Scottenheimer, you bum. What a
motivator. So go Donks nexted week ( and thusly soon to be banished
from the 'offs, i hopes!).
Speakin' of the Donks, another display of mediocrity. They ought to
send a personal thank you to Warren (?) for fumbling that ball.
And did they import the Clemson timekeeper for the end of the game?
THREE seconds elapsing for a spike by the QB? What a joke! And
then the last incompletion heave by the QB. There were THREE ticks left
on the clock when the ball fell incomplete and the ref gave the signal.
But presto! 3..2..1..0. Game over. Natural Orange progression...
Clemson to the Donks. 8^)
MikeL
|
36.1621 | Winnin Ugleee | ROCK::MURPHY | | Mon Dec 21 1992 13:48 | 10 |
| Same Broncs - with Elway they play 2-3 points above the competition at home,
without they play 4-7 points below.
re -.2 told you the jints would come through...
Mail this one in - Marty has to be having some recurring nightmares this
week, and Danny and Elway are licking their chops... Bring on the fish...
Even at home, Marty can't beat Denver...
Murph
|
36.1622 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 21 1992 13:54 | 4 |
| Next weeks game is in KC?? If that is the case Broncos can kiss their playoff
hopes good bye.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1623 | | ROCK::MURPHY | | Mon Dec 21 1992 14:45 | 3 |
| Wanna put your p-name where your mouth is?
Murph
|
36.1624 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Mon Dec 21 1992 14:48 | 5 |
| KC will be a chokin' on that chickenbone. Denver wins this one ugly,
but win they do.
MikeL
|
36.1625 | DEAL! p-name bet it is | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 21 1992 14:55 | 4 |
| Actually I don't give a hoot who wins, but sure I'll put a p-name
bet on this one.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1626 | Good - I have a good one set up. | ROCK::MURPHY | Copper Mountain here I come!!! | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:24 | 8 |
| Now that I figured out how to turn the dang thing on, I am ready
for ya. I have a real good one ready. Will reveal it nexted week.
Have one extra boost for the Bronco gods this week, as I will be in
Boulder come Tues Nite. Anyone care to comment on the ski conditions? Be nice
to get on THE slopes (the Wachusett slush just don't turn me on.)
Murph
|
36.1627 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:39 | 7 |
| So what will my p-name need to be if the Broncos win. I mean we usually
set this up ahead of time.
I am ope to suggestions as to what Murph's p-name will be next week, I assume
the p-name bet is for one week. So if you have suggestions, send me mail.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1628 | Murph's p-name to be | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 21 1992 16:32 | 9 |
| p-name that Murph will use for a week after the Broncos lose will
be: (courtesy of Mr. Childs).
John Elway Girly-Mon Supreme!
Week begins with the first use of the p-name in this notesfile.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1629 | Funny, I should ask about "being too big" hahaha | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Dec 21 1992 22:13 | 11 |
|
Fantasy question for MikeC
Will your P-Name fit in the allocated space? Is it too big for Murph?
????????
I remain,
returning after an absense!
Kev
|
36.1630 | And the winner is... | ROCK::MURPHY | Copper Mountain here I come!!! | Tue Dec 22 1992 10:41 | 8 |
| OK, your p-name will be...
Harry Carray is my hero!
I had some other Cubbie derivatives that seemed to be too long for this
particular forum...
Murph
|
36.1631 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 11:27 | 7 |
| Kev,
Yeah I tested the p-name and it will fit.
I remain, your tester of wierd things
The Crazy Met
|
36.1632 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 11:28 | 5 |
| Murph,
Are you a Cub's fan? Just curious.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1633 | Bleacher Bum | ROCK::MURPHY | Copper Mountain here I come!!! | Tue Dec 22 1992 12:56 | 11 |
| This April will be the first Cub's opening day I have missed in 4 years.
Just finished studies at the U of Illinois, so I was poisoned by the masses
of Chicago folk there during my six year stay (what the hey, there was no home
team in Denver). Spent all last summer as a bum at my friends' pad at 722 W.
Addison.
So yes, I am a Cubs fan. But then, as a stroke of fortune would have it,
I came to be employed by Digital, and moved to Boston to add an AL team to
my portfolio - just in time for THEM to ne in last place...
Murph
|
36.1634 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 22 1992 13:22 | 8 |
| So let me get this straight.
A Bronco fan whis is a Cubs fan, probably a Rockies fan, and
now a Red Sox fan as well. Hmm, you could see all 3 of your
teams in last place in the same season. A bit far fetched,
but ...
The Crazy Met
|
36.1635 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | No. 3 Looms over FENWAY | Tue Dec 22 1992 13:34 | 6 |
|
C'mon Yoseff you know the Cubs will finish ahead of the Mets...:-)
Chappy
|
36.1636 | May happen, though | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Tue Dec 22 1992 15:22 | 4 |
| As well as the Indians finishing ahead of the Yanks! ;*)
Spud
|
36.1637 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The QB shuffle stinks | Tue Dec 22 1992 16:26 | 5 |
| Will Schottenhiemer (sp?) hex himself come sunday?
Will it matter?
Tim
|
36.1638 | heh heh heh | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Sun Dec 27 1992 16:11 | 10 |
|
Mike Child - you owe me one!
Actually I had little interest besides the p-name bet in who won the
game. That is until I found out that I was betting my p-name against a
CUBS fan. How sweet it is. I hope that Murph notes often during the
next week or so.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1639 | Derrick, Derrick!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cool Down, Stop actin' Crazy | Mon Dec 28 1992 08:00 | 6 |
|
Thanks TCM. Much like the Elway/Marty curse was broken, you've broken my
curse against the Donks.....I was happy to see KC win even more happy that
Elway contributed 2 td's to winning effort........
;^)
|
36.1640 | Turned ugly quick! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Mon Dec 28 1992 09:16 | 15 |
| The donks started out good, but then fell apart once KC got the
their 1st turnover. Derrick Thomas deserves the game ball from
Schottenhiemer.
Congrats to the Cheifs and fans, if there are any in here (RONS?).
The cheifs defense scored 3x and set up a 4th.
The cheifs offense is suspect. They didn't have to go far to score
the offensive points.
It shows in the post today that Denver only had 3 turnovers? I
thought they had more than that?
Tim
|
36.1641 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 28 1992 09:30 | 6 |
| Broncos had more than 3 fumbles, but only 3 turnovers - that is KC got
the ball. When the KCplayer fumbled on the 3 yard line and a 21-13 score
I thought Marty must be thinking about that 2nd Denver-Cleveland AFC
championship game.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1642 | Drafts | ROCK::MURPHY | John Elway - Girly Mon Supreme! | Mon Dec 28 1992 11:01 | 16 |
| Add one more draft to wait and worry about. Bad weekend to be Orange and Blue...
but that will change. Look for two Orange and Blue wins this week - Illinois
and Syracuse.
If Denver doesn't draft an OL in the first round or use the free agent market
that is developing to pick one up, I quit. Looking at Freeman, I really think
they could have been served well by trading Humphrey and a couple of picks for
an all-pro OL rather than an injured Sammie Smith. It seems counter intuitive
to me to be building for the future the year after you almost went to the
Super Bowl... that is when you should be trying to pick up the last cog for this
year's machine instead.
Do the Pats get the number one pick? Who do they take? Bledsoe/Mirer?
Garrison Hearst?
Murph
|
36.1643 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 28 1992 11:04 | 6 |
|
Pats get first pick in the draft, Seattle second, Jets third. ESPN had
the Pats taking a non-QB, Seattle taking Mirer and the Jets taking a
non-QB. Bedloe was not listed since he is not officially in the draft.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1644 | outta here | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:09 | 19 |
| Just heard from a co-worker that Reeves is gone. He heard it from
the radio.
Alot of us wanted his head and now that time has come. BG will be
happy once he hears. Whats next? I hope that they get a motivational
coach that can draft! players that is...
Any early speculation as to whom the new coach will be?
Wade Phillips? Mike Shannahan? probably neither. No cowaboy has
been pleaaassssssssseeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!
Next year should be interesting. Regardless of whom it is, it will
be either dismal or great, but probably no in-between (8-8) like this
year.
Are there any great coaches out there?
Tim
|
36.1645 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:14 | 6 |
|
Tim, Bill Parcells is available, but he may want more control than
Bowlen is willing to give.
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
36.1646 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:26 | 5 |
| Hey if Reeves were fired last season than Walsh might have been available.
The challenge of winning a Super Bowl as coach of the Broncos might have
been too intriguing for Walsh to pass up :-)
The Crazy Met
|
36.1647 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:28 | 9 |
| Well, with Reeves gone who is the horse gonna mate with?
On that note, the discussion on the FAN today was around Reeves
becoming the new head coach of the Giants.
Mike C., wouldn't you just love that? Mebbe he'll bring your buddy
Elway with him.
JoJ_NOT
|
36.1648 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Mon Dec 28 1992 17:40 | 6 |
| I think Denver screwed up! Expect the doinks to return to their pre-Dan
Reeves form......Bucky or no Bucky.....
Carloski
|
36.1649 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | The Mothership Connection | Tue Dec 29 1992 10:30 | 4 |
|
If'n it weren't for Reeves, Sea Biscuit never would have thrown those
two INTs or fumbled in the end zone. They should have drawn and quart-
ered the bugger ! Firing's too good for him !
|
36.1650 | Reeves | ROCK::MURPHY | John Elway - Girly Mon Supreme! | Tue Dec 29 1992 10:48 | 9 |
| My preDitkacion - Reeves coaches the Bears next year - to the Super Bowl.
Harbaugh makes all-pro. AFC finally wins a Super Bowl - Dolphins.
My other money is on Shanahan getting the head coach job. Gotta make Elway
happy.
You heard it here first.
Murph
|
36.1651 | You heard it here second... | FDCV06::KING | Be nice, I'm a Pheresis donor........... | Tue Dec 29 1992 11:47 | 3 |
| Lou Holtz will be the nexted Bronco coach...
REK
|
36.1652 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 29 1992 12:41 | 39 |
| Holtz in Denver - HA! At least it'd get him out of South Bend. And if
I think the Bronco haters are bad now...
Well Leary, so much for your pick of Denver beating KC. We can only
hope you have an equal lack of success in your Cotton Bowl prediction.
(you're picking ND, right? :^))
This offense sure looks pathetic away from Mile High. They don't move
the ball with *any* sort of consistency, and to top it off they hand
the Chiefs 3 TD's. Not to take anything away from the KC defense, but
needless to say you're gonna almost always lose when the opposing defense
scores 21 points.
It isn't too hard to figure out the biggest problem of the '92 Broncos
- when they go on the road, they're among the worst in the league. For
whatever reason, this team was like night and day between road and
home. Even a measly 4-4 road record would've given this team a bye in
the playoffs and possibly home field throughout.
The biggest surprise about the Reeves decision to me was that it came
so quick. I was also surprised about the number of people who were
upset about his firing. It seems like I you heard and read was
criticism of Dan, but now that he's gone they don't like the decision.
It was like it was fashionable to criticize Reeves, even though people
really preferred him as the Bronco coach.
I'll be very surprised if Shanahan isn't the next Bronco coach. Wade
PHillips is also an obvious frontrunner, but anyone can see the
problems this team has had in the past couple years is on offense,
which gives Shanahan the edge. And it was in '86-'87 when Shanahan was
fully running the offensive show that Denver's offense was among the
league's best. The bad part of this is that there's a good chance that
Phillips will follow Reeves if Reeves gets hired elsewhere.
About the only other candidates being mentioned at this point are
Dennis Erickson and Steve Spurrier.
Joe
|
36.1653 | It's been real Dan... Now Git !!! | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 12:53 | 37 |
|
Gawd... Anyone but Holtz !!! Please !!
I'm glad to see Reeves gone. He's done alot for the Donks but his
time has passed. He needs to rethink his football and come out fresh.
I would'nt be suprised to see him in HOTlanta. He is after all from
there.
My money is on Shanahan but I don't htink that would be the best
decision for the Donks. I'd love to see Parcells come to Denver
but it would mean a few years of rebuilding to bring the team around
to his style assuming he'd want to do that. I'd love to see Mouse
Davis come in with a highly modified version of the R&S. Bill Walsh
would be a dream coach for Elway and the Donks but that ain't gonna
happen.
I kinda feel sorry for Reeves that way things happened but I have to
disagree with Carloskiwitz... The will be good for the donks in the
long run.
Nexted year will be interesting... The Donk's probably won't make the
playoffs two years in a row. It will take longer that this offseason
to fix the problems unless Bowlen hits the road with a wide open check-
book for the upcoming free agents. That is doubtful because Bowlen is
as tight fisted as Joe Robbie(Miami) ever was. Look for the Donks to
either finish 5 - 11 next year or 12 - 4... From Donk land, It will
be interesting.
My Top Five Coaching Choices for Bowlen:
Bill Walsh
Bill Parcells
Mouse Davis
Wade Phillips
Mike Shanahan
p.s. Jerry and Elvis' seats will be gon from Hotlanta soon !!
|
36.1654 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Pete Pavia a true American Hero | Tue Dec 29 1992 14:13 | 14 |
| Let's see Elway throws 9 TD's and 17 interceptions for the year and you think
being away from home was the biggest problem Joe? Of course if you look at it
as being away from home as the biggest problem than it would support me
contention that most of Bucky's big comebacks were with the able assistance
of the refs....
;^)
BG, I thought you told us they were going to the Superbowl? Guess what just
like the Giants they're out playing golf.........
happy trails to you....
mike
|
36.1655 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:08 | 7 |
|
Mike.... I got a P-Name that syas the Donks finish better than the
GIants next year...
Joe, I like the Dennis Ericson theroy... He'd be great !!
BG
|
36.1656 | Go Reeves......and take BigTeef wif ya! | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:10 | 15 |
| HAHAHA,
My reverse whammy worked. Got Schottenheimer the wisenheimer out from
underneathe the BigTeefCurse! Go Chiefs!!
Now all I gotta do is praise the Aggies to high heaven and pick 'em by
10! In da bag!
Lou Holtz in Denver?? Never happen. Cain ya hear po' Lou talking about
"the best Raider team he's ever seen" TWICE during the year. Keep him
in South Bend where he's appreciated.
Add this to the Donks' short list for a coach: Rod Humenick.
The Patsies "gift" to the future success of the Donks...
MikeL
|
36.1657 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:11 | 9 |
| Erickson just signed an extension at Miami. Sure he could leave anyway
but it just is not going to happen.
Assume that Parcells will only go back to coaching if he has real control.
Sounds like Bowlen is not willing to give a coach that kind of authority.
Also, if Parcells has a choice of going back to the Giants (may or may not)
I doubt that he will go anywhere else.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1658 | | DECWET::METZGER | This space being flea bombed.. | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:19 | 17 |
|
I think the away record is the true indication of the Doncs. Year after Year
they look more impressive than they are because they can pile on the wins in
the high altitude of Denver. Usually coming on strong in the 2nd half when
the opposition runs out of breath...
Put them in a stadium without that advantage and they suck....
Firing the coach isn't going to improve the team...
Look for Bowlen to hire some flunky and watch the team hit the skids...
Bowlen is another Ken Behring (Seahawks owner)..cheap, stupid and thinks he
knows more about football than the professionals....
Metz
|
36.1659 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Pete Pavia a true American Hero | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:20 | 1 |
| if we survive you're on BG.....
|
36.1660 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 15:30 | 8 |
|
Ok Childs...
Metz, I have a feeling you might be right (about Bowlen) but I really
hope not. The rest of what you said is a bunch of anti-donk crap.
BG
|
36.1661 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:12 | 8 |
| Hey Big'N'Lame,
I know another coach who's available(but maybe not willing)
How's about the Emperor Chas. Noll??
JaKe
|
36.1662 | not such a bad idea, consider ... | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:21 | 6 |
| Yeah JaKe, Noll might be acceptable. I mean Parcell's team whipped Denver
in the SB, Walsh's team whipped Denver in the SB. But Denver happened to
face Dallas during the Steelers glory years, so Noll never got the chance
to take a crack at Denver.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1663 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:24 | 5 |
| The STEELERS and Denver both knocked each other off during the
playoffs, though, many times throughout the years.
JaKe
|
36.1664 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:31 | 32 |
|
Childs, I was just talking in general. They played absolutely terrible in
just about every road game and finished 1-7. And you can talk about Elway's
poor stats all day - he's never had great stats and probably never will.
That's just the type of QB he is. As good as he can look in the last couple
minutes of a game though, he sure can look bad on occasion. He deserves a good
portion of the blame for the loss at KC.
> I think the away record is the true indication of the Doncs. Year after Year
> they look more impressive than they are because they can pile on the wins in
> the high altitude of Denver. Usually coming on strong in the 2nd half when
> the opposition runs out of breath...
I don't think it's all due to the altitude, alot of it is probably just mental.
That's one area I feel a new coach will be good - hopefully whoever it is will
get this team ready to play on the road, especially in the big games. Under
Reeves I recall Denver winning only one big game on the road in very impressive
fashion.
> Put them in a stadium without that advantage and they suck....
That was very true this season, but last year they managed to go 5-3 away from
home and they ended up with the 2nd-best record in the AFC.
RE: Erickson
I'd love to see him here too, but on the other hand I'd hate to see the Canes
lose him. And true, he did just sign a 7-year contract, but I heard something
about it having an escape clause in it about him going to the pros. I think
he's a longshot to come to Denver, though.
Joe
|
36.1665 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:39 | 5 |
| Denver won against the Brown on the road - but they needed a last minute
drive to do that. Which big game did they win on the road in impressive fashion?
Just curious on this one.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1666 | Bowlen = Cheap? | ROCK::MURPHY | John Elway - Girly Mon Supreme! | Tue Dec 29 1992 16:44 | 7 |
| I'm not sure on this score, Metz...
I've heard some poor house Bowlen stories, but doesn't Denver have one of the
higher league salary levels? Fortunately for Bolwen supported by the team
support...
Murph
|
36.1667 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Dec 29 1992 17:24 | 6 |
|
Murph... Did you lose a P-Name bet ??
if not you're a trator !!!
BG
|
36.1668 | from the king of the p-name betters | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Dec 29 1992 17:36 | 5 |
| BG,
read .1621-.1630 and you'll understand Murph's p-name.
The Crazy Met
|
36.1669 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Dec 29 1992 19:01 | 18 |
| > Denver won against the Brown on the road - but they needed a last minute
> drive to do that. Which big game did they win on the road in impressive fashion?
> Just curious on this one.
Last game of the '84 season, Denver goes into Seattle. Winner gets the
division title while the loser has to play the following week in the wildcard
game. I believe the score was 31-10, Denver.
RE: Bowlen
I'm also a little worried about him being a little cheap, and that'll
especially hurt with free agency looming on the horizon. One of the more
interesting things that came out of the Reeves dismissal was that Dan wanted to
get certain players thru trade or whatever (Webster Slaughter and Mike
Pritchard were a couple names that came up) but Bowlen wouldn't let him because
of financial reasons. Doesn't sound good...
Joe
|
36.1670 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Tue Dec 29 1992 20:03 | 11 |
| This just in from Mike and the Mad-dog on the FAN....Donks are
considering, among others, former Jets coach Joe "Brain Dead" Walton
for the head coaching spot in Denver. HA HA HA HA HA...I hope they sign
him!!!!
I'll bet he could pick and shoot those boogers a couple extra feet in
Pile-it-High Stadium.
Hawwwww!!!
JoJ_NOT
|
36.1671 | Overrated NY talkmasters | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Wed Dec 30 1992 08:23 | 6 |
| HAHA
Mike and the Mad Dog. You know how knowledgeable they are; they think
Lee Corso is a great analyst. Nuff said!
MikeL
|
36.1672 | All speculation for 1-2 more weeks | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Wed Dec 30 1992 10:44 | 9 |
| JoJ_*, Of course you only show up when the donks are out. You
dissapeared for what seemed like half of the season. What happened to
those Jesters? I thought you said they would win the east?
This nose picker "twist" is bunk!
MikeL, I will have to agree with ya.....re-1
Tim
|
36.1673 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Thu Dec 31 1992 19:14 | 16 |
| Wait a second...Mike and the Mad Dog are truly America's sports
authorities. Geez, they announced Handley's firing a week before the
Giants would admit to it.
They had ol' Joey Brain Dead Walton on the show today. He sounded kinda
congested, but it could have been that finger cloggin up the works.
Anyway, he said that he and the Donks have been in contact and he's a
top candidate for the position.
C'mon, you donkolas would love that nose picker hangin on the sidelines
in Pile it High.
Imagine how the horse would get confused with Waltons complex offensive
scheme...he'd throw 4 INT's for every TD.
JoJ_NOT
|
36.1674 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 04 1993 08:11 | 16 |
| > Wait a second...Mike and the Mad Dog are truly America's sports
> authorities. Geez, they announced Handley's firing a week before the
> Giants would admit to it.
I have to agree with JoJ on this one.
Say, JoJ, believe it or not, the Giants actually finished with a
better record than the Jests.... How bout that. Remember the chat
we had after Giantsmania?????
BTW, I never knew that Mesereau was from Southern Ct State.....
'Saw
|
36.1675 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Mon Jan 04 1993 09:19 | 19 |
| I'm gonna lose it if the picker comes to Denver.
I say either Wade Phillips or Shannahan will be coach. At 1st I said
Shannahan wouldn't be back, but Bowlen doesn't care about salt in the
wound and they DO get along!
It won't matter if Bowlen doesn't give up some $$$$ for a good OLT
and a premeir pass rusher other than Simon. Those are the 2 key
positions now.
Maybe Jumbo Elliot and REggie White?
At CB, they could use Byrd from SD. Dump Dimry and Henderson if they
get a good man-man CB. Le Lo Lang should start with Braxton as Nick
back!
Tim
|
36.1676 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Jan 04 1993 20:34 | 11 |
| Hey Saw,
it cost me a lunch with a Giants fan at work. I thought the Jets would
have won that game against the Dolts and the Giants and Jets would have
finished with the same record. But then, the Jets crashed, and the
Giants pulled one outta their butts.
Oh well, at least I'm not a Donk fan. That's one thing to be happy
about.
joJ_not
|
36.1677 | | QUASER::HUNTER | The Often Quoted Big Game Hunter | Tue Jan 05 1993 14:50 | 28 |
|
JoJ_NOT
Don't tell me you're happy about being a Jests fan... The haven't
won a division title since the league merger... Lets see, The Donks
have won 5 in the last decade. The jest are one of the worst teams
in the NFL, have been for quite some time now. You think they were
bad this year... wait till next. The Fish are strong, Luckalo will
always be good with kelly, and the Patsies are going to be up and
coming very soon... Look for the flippin Jesters to sit in the cellar
for some time to come.
Well, Bowlen is running aroound telling everyone who will listen the
Mike Shannahan isn't a lock for the Denver job. The press however
thinks it all said and done and Mikey will be back slamming beers with
Elway right after the 9er's win the bowl (yes thats a prediction).
I gotta believe this is the case as well since Bowlen wants a yes man
to help run the team into the ground. I sure hope Pats doesn't do
something stupid like that. I'm not saying that Mike could'nt do a
good job and that he hasn't learned anything from his stint in LA
and SF but it just to much buddy buddy for me. I say bring in a fresh
crew... Ericson would be cool !!
BG
|
36.1678 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 05 1993 15:23 | 10 |
| Yeah, there's been lots and lots of Jests stuff on the FAN lately.
In fact, now that Ray Handley is gone, wait for the cries of Bruce must
Go to fill the Meadowlands nexted season.
There are a bunch of rabid Jets fans calling in, and they are waiting
for the draft to see what kind of mistake gets drafted this time.....8^)
'Saw
|
36.1679 | Jests = red Sox !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:14 | 8 |
|
And thats about it !! The Jests are the perfect example of a
poorly managed team with no talent and a bunch of crybaby, whiney,
jaded, Girly Mon, whimp Fans, JoJ_NOT included. JoJ... I'll be out
next fall, get me some ticket to a game so I can watch the Jets
crash and burn.
BG
|
36.1680 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:18 | 4 |
| � -< Jests = red Sox !! >-
But the Sox have won their division and been to the Big Dance in the
last 10 years...
|
36.1681 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:30 | 5 |
| True... I hate to say this but Jest = Cubs... Jests = Nuggets
and so on !!
BG
|
36.1682 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 05 1993 16:41 | 1 |
| The Cubs have won the NL East a couple of times in the last 10 years.
|
36.1683 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Tue Jan 05 1993 17:11 | 4 |
|
Ok, Ok !!! Lets see... ahhh how about Jets = Jets
BG
|
36.1684 | | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:06 | 2 |
| If it wasn't for Elway & Co., Reeves would be another Handley. I sure
hope Bidwill doesn't axe Bugel for this guy.
|
36.1685 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | R.I.P. Johnny | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:21 | 4 |
| JoJ_NOT, you may not be a Donkey fan, but I remember when JoJ
was one...
/Don
|
36.1686 | Elway made Reeves... I think that pretty clear ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Big Game... On The BOLTS Bandwagon | Wed Jan 06 1993 16:10 | 16 |
|
Me too, Slasher... When that punk from Jersey lived out here he
was rabid about the Donks
Mike Heiser,
We don't usually agree on much but I believe you hit the nail on the
head with your analysis of coach Reeves performance in Denver.
I remain,
Pissed about the Junk Note Scandle
BG
|
36.1687 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Wed Jan 06 1993 19:22 | 11 |
| re: /Donus and Cocka_Jack
JoJ was *never* a Donks fan. And another thing, Red Sox = Rangers.
Jets will rule nexted year.
And Cocka_jack, if you come out here nexted fall, I'll get the seats by
those Biker dudes that you were high-fivin when the Jets crushed the
Fish.
JoJ_not
|
36.1688 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Another NEW Boston Garden gone | Thu Jan 07 1993 12:27 | 6 |
| Hey JoJ_NOT, I was kind of hoping you would save those "Harley"
seats for me. I kind of liked the girl with the tatoo of the skull
and crossbones on her cheek. She seemed sweet and wholesome. And
JoJ was indeed a Donkey fan when they were winning.
/Don
|