T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
15.1 | Preseason Big10 Pix | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jan 03 1991 14:53 | 24 |
| Whoa the Hurryin' Hoosiers look like they might be reel what with
the blowout of the admittedly rebuilding Illini last night. First
congrat's to ESPN for not broadcasting any Big10 hoops this year,
I enjoy watching ACC action night in night out nonstop.
But cain the Hoosiers do well against teams with big quick front-
lines? Probably not, cuz a: 1) no middlemain, 2) thin at forward
with no good subs behind Calbert & Eric, and 3) shaky outside shooting
from a guard-orientated squad. But, on the other hand they have two
fine forwards, a bus load a guards, and play tough D. Oh, and they
have the best coach ever in the annals of team sports.
Final preconference pix:
1. Buckeyes (Jim is God and the reast ain't to shabby either)
2. State (Peplowski and other young players will come on strong)
3. Hoosiers (Big10 familiar with how to zone Hoosiers into losses)
4. Illini (don't let last night fool ya)
5. Iowa (they have the hot center looks like)
6. Michigan (stupidest coach ever, even by Ann Arbor's low standards)
7. Minnesota (young talent)
8. Purdue (Gene will find a way he always does)
9. Wisconsin (bye bye Yoder!)
10. Mildcats (a_already bad team made wretched by defections)
|
15.2 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Me so thorny | Tue Jan 08 1991 15:08 | 4 |
| Damn. I knew that Big10 hoops was down this year but one note
in one week?!
Big10 Tom
|
15.3 | | SACT41::ROSS | Bush will wimp out | Tue Jan 08 1991 16:07 | 34 |
| Okay, MrT, I'll join in...
I can't track down my pre-season picks, but I think the top three were
Ohio State, Michigan State, and IU in that order. Here's my pre-Big10
revised picks:
15-3 *Indiana : They have the depth, they have the coach, there
isn't a whole lot of size in the Big 10 this year,
and they have Calbert and Damon;
14-4 *Ohio State : They don't have the depth that IU has and foul
trouble {which is common in the Big 10} will cost
them a couple games;
13-5 *Michigan State : By default; They haven't shown any signs of
repeating yet; Missing some solid team players;
10-8 *Iowa : They've been the surprise team so far;
9-9 *Illinois : Better than expected; Unless Coach Lou finds a
way to screw them up; Thomas is a budding star;
8-10 Purdue : Gene will use this season to prep for next year
8-10 Minnesota : Lost to Wisconsin?
6-12 Wisconsin : Beat Minnesota?
5-13 Michigan : Haw Haw Haw... The joke is that Fisher is a worse
coach than Freider! Nothing like taking over a
team with 5 NBA players and turning that into a
multi-year contract.
2-16 Northwestern : But they'll lead the league in future Tony awards
* = Tournament Teams
Big game next Monday with the Hoosiers travelling to West Lafayette to
face a weak Boilermaker team. A big win by Bob might set the stage for
a championship run. A loss might cause me to reassess.
|
15.4 | OTHER going home? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | | Wed Jan 09 1991 13:25 | 7 |
| Wandering hoopster Lawrence Funderburke (unaffectionately known as
"other" in Indiana's statistical summary for the '89-'90 season) is expected
to enroll for the second semester at Ohio State. Funderburke would be
eligible to play beginning the second semester of next year, and would have
2.5 years of eligibility remaining.
tom
|
15.5 | | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: 1990 NoTY | Wed Jan 09 1991 15:37 | 20 |
| That's bad news. The last thing we need is ThunderBurp over in
St. John Arena tearing up the paint on behalf of a non-IU squad...
Deon Thomas' play thus far explains why all the fuss, he's pure
STUD... Gibbons rates Purdue's recruit #1 in the nation and
Henderson only 7th... Michigan looks like they'll end up with the
#1 recruiting class in the nation... Minnesota will start playing
Ernest Nsigamasabo more, he's the 6-10 Watusi from Burundi who's
only played hoops for 3 years, a 4.0 GPA in engineering who speaks
6 languages and popped the 1400 mark on his SATs (should catch on
reel quick)... Alan Henderson is a 3.8 1300+ Nat'l Honors Society
student at Brebeuf, perhaps the top prep school in Indiana... Acie
Earl is doing very well for Iowa in the middle this year and is now
regarded by many as the best center in the conference... Iowa is
also ranked in the top few for overall recruiting classes... Clem
Haskins of Minnesota is working very hard to sign Chris Weber, and
is reportedly down to the final 3 with State and Michigan (Michigan
is favored)...
Big10 Tom
|
15.6 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Jan 09 1991 15:47 | 12 |
| � That's bad news. The last thing we need is ThunderBurp over in
� St. John Arena tearing up the paint on behalf of a non-IU squad...
MrT
Does `tearing up the paint' equate to the theater's
`chewing the scenery' (as in really hamming it up).
If it doesn't... I think it should
ie. a player that tears up the paint is a hotdog.
Mike JN
|
15.7 | Big Ten Update 1-10-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu Jan 10 1991 13:29 | 40 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-10-91) NCAA
Date: 10 Jan 91 16:12:41 GMT
Tonight:
#64 Minnesota at #67 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm
#69 Michigan at #42 IOWA 7:00 pm
#68 Wisconsin at #24 MICHIGAN STATE 7:00 pm
#5 Ohio State at #241 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#42 Iowa at #64 MINNESOTA 1:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#241 Northwestern at #24 MICHIGAN STATE 3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#68 Wisconsin at #5 OHIO STATE 7:00 pm
#69 Michigan at #33 PURDUE 7:00 pm
Monday:
#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
#5 Ohio State 12-0 2-0
#6 Indiana 14-1 2-0
#68 Wisconsin 7-4 1-0
#42 Iowa 12-2 1-1
#33 Purdue 9-3 1-1
#67 Illinois 11-4 1-1
#24 Michigan State 8-4 1-1
#64 Minnesota 7-4 0-1
#69 Michigan 7-5 0-2
#241 Northwestern 5-6 0-2
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler [email protected] |
| Illinois State Water Survey or: [email protected] |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
15.8 | | SACT41::ROSS | Luck be a lady tonight | Fri Jan 11 1991 08:25 | 19 |
| Last night in the Big 10:
Minnesota at ILLINOIS Illinois won 67-66
Michigan at IOWA Iowa won 79-78
Wisconsin at MICHIGAN STATE Mich St won 65-50
Ohio State at NORTHWESTERN Ohio St won 102-60
RECORDS:
Ohio State 13-0 3-0
Indiana 14-1 2-0
Iowa 13-2 2-1
Illinois 12-4 2-1
Michigan State 9-4 2-1
Purdue 9-3 1-1
Wisconsin 7-5 1-1
Minnesota 7-5 0-2
Michigan 7-6 0-3
Northwestern 5-7 0-3
|
15.9 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | QUICK! Jump into debunker now! | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:03 | 5 |
| Boy, Illinois and Minnesota are badly underrated to be way down
in the 60s. Both teams are young, both, especially the Illini,
have big-time talent.
Big10 Tom
|
15.10 | | SACT41::ROSS | Luck be a lady tonight | Fri Jan 11 1991 11:15 | 8 |
| So, MrT, when is Minnesota going to do something with all that talent you
talk about? 7-5 is not exactly lighting the world on fire. They aren't
even much of a threat to go to the NCAA's unless they start winning some
road games in the Big 10.
Illinois and Iowa, unfortunately, seem to be much better than predicted.
Michigan, gleefully, seems worse. If Fisher doesn't get Chris Weber, does
he lose his job as well?
|
15.11 | Golden Goofers Need Time Is All | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | QUICK! Jump into debunker now! | Fri Jan 11 1991 14:17 | 22 |
| Remember first that Clem & Co. have played two road games thus far
in the Big10 (@ Madison and Champaign). Second, this team is
extremely young, basically all first year players except for three
players:
- Kevin Lynch, big guard who was a role player now thrust into
position of go-to guy, and he's fumbling.
- Walter Bond, swingman former role player who's now trying to act
as if he's Willie Burton. Bond is OK but no star, especially on
offense. Important to note that as a key player he's missed most
of the year with a foot injury (he's just back now).
- Bob Martin, 9 ft. tall center, has played well occasionally (as
he did against Ga. Tech in the regional finals last year) but is
basically a foul-prone no-rebound no-defense stiff.
So Clem needs time, time to break in Ernest Nsigamasabo in the middle,
time to break in Arriel McDonald on the point, time to break in his
book-end forwards Carter and Jackson up front.
Big10 Tom
|
15.12 | | SACT41::ROSS | Lesboscious! | Mon Jan 14 1991 09:08 | 29 |
| Saturday:
Minnesota 79 Iowa 77 But can Gophers win on road?
Mich State 66 Northwestern 59 Wow! Michigan State is really not as
expected. This was a home game.
Ohio State 92 Wisconsin 60 It's a two team race in the Big 10
Purdue 86 Michigan 69 Any win is a big win for Purdue now, but
the spread is very surprising {but
gratifying!}
RECORDS:
Ohio State 14-0 4-0
Indiana 14-1 2-0
Michigan State 10-4 3-1
Purdue 10-3 2-1
Illinois 12-4 2-1
Iowa 13-3 2-2
Wisconsin 7-6 1-2
Minnesota 8-5 1-2
Michigan 7-7 0-4
Northwestern 5-8 0-4
Tonight, the game of the year {for me}... On national TV. Bob vs Gene.
#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE 8:30 pm ESPN
|
15.13 | Purdue Powerhouse? | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | AD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Mon Jan 14 1991 10:43 | 7 |
| Well well, turns out that we all were hoodwinked by what has come
to be the perenniel blooming of blossomus poormouthicus in the
garden tended by Purdue Alumni. Are the Boilermakers a threat for
the Big10 Crown?! Peut etre. We shall see tonight as the Farm
Implements host Bob's elegant team of transition gamecocks.
Big10 Tom
|
15.14 | | SACT41::ROSS | Lesboscious! | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:39 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 15.13 by CARP::SHAUGHNESSY "AD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989" >>>
> -< Purdue Powerhouse? >-
>
> Well well, turns out that we all were hoodwinked by what has come
> to be the perenniel blooming of blossomus poormouthicus in the
> garden tended by Purdue Alumni. Are the Boilermakers a threat for
> the Big10 Crown?! Peut etre.
Seems like MrT is trying to put the pregame spin-control on... If the
Boilers win, it will be a major upset. Indiana should be favored by
at least 10. Purdue is without their starting point guard {Woody
Austin - academics} and has no size, no speed, and little experience.
|
15.15 | i see | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | AD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:25 | 4 |
| So then, what you're saying, Mr. Farm Implement, is that these Big10
victories by Purdue are mass hallucinations?
Big10 Tom
|
15.16 | Big Ten Update 1-11-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Jan 14 1991 20:53 | 86 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-11-91) NCAA
Date: 11 Jan 91 21:40:04 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#67 ILLINOIS 67, #64 Minnesota 66: Lightning struck again in
Assembly Hall, as Rennie Clemons sank a one-handed prayer and
subsequent winning free throw with 3.2 seconds left for another
come-from-behind win. The Gophers, which were blown out of Wisconsin
Fieldhouse on Monday, were helped by poor Illinois shooting early
on, and led most of this game, sometimes by as many as 13 points in
the second half. But, just like Purdue Saturday, they could not
hold on down the stretch. The Gophers missed some key free throws
late, but what else is new. Lou Henson looked like he had just won the
lottery when Clemons' shot fell, a shot which only Michael Jordan is
supposed to make. The Gophers also had big first half leads, once
of 23-15. Andy Kaufmann came back after a cold first half to do
some second half damage. This is the third straight home game which
has been preceded by an ice storm...
#42 IOWA 79, #69 Michigan 78: Michigan jumped ahead 12-zip, and set
the tone for a very exciting and close game at Iowa. Iowa managed
to establish a 64-56 lead toward the later stages of the game, but
the Wolverines tied it up at 71 with 3:25 left, and it wasn't until
a Val Barnes basket (76-75) that Iowa was up for good. Barnes had
17, Rodell Davis 22, and Acie Earl 15 for Iowa, while scoring
machine Demetrious Calip led Michigan with 23. This was by far the
Wolverines best conference game to date...
#24 MICHIGAN STATE 65, #68 Wisconsin 50: This game was played at
Wisconsin's pace, but the Spartans were just too much at home. The
fiesty Badgers actually led by 24-23 at halftime in what must have
been frustration for the big crowd. The Badgers widened the lead to
30-25 early in the second stanza before the Spartans went on a 17-3
run (42-33) to settle things. Steve Smith scored 21 and Mike
Peplowski 19, a career high...
#5 Ohio State 102, #241 NORTHWESTERN 62: The Wildcats were beaten
by 40+ points for the second consecutive game. OSU led 44-26 at
halftime, and outscored NU 25-4 in the early stages of the second
half to really put it away (69-30). Jim Jackson had 23 points, 17
in the second half (as usual). Northwestern may go winless in the
conference this year...
Saturday:
#42 Iowa at #64 MINNESOTA 1:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#241 Northwestern at #24 MICHIGAN STATE 3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#68 Wisconsin at #5 OHIO STATE 7:00 pm
#69 Michigan at #33 PURDUE 7:00 pm
Monday:
#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE 8:30 pm ESPN
Thursday:
#24 Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm
#42 Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
#33 Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
RECORDS:
#5 Ohio State 13-0 3-0
#6 Indiana 14-1 2-0
#42 Iowa 13-2 2-1
#67 Illinois 12-4 2-1
#24 Michigan State 9-4 2-1
#33 Purdue 9-3 1-1
#68 Wisconsin 7-5 1-1
#64 Minnesota 7-5 0-2
#69 Michigan 7-6 0-3
#241 Northwestern 5-7 0-3
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler [email protected] |
| Illinois State Water Survey or: [email protected] |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
15.17 | Big Ten Update 1-14-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Jan 14 1991 20:55 | 107 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-14-91) NCAA
Date: 14 Jan 91 19:17:11 GMT
Don't forget to watch tonight's second part of Big Monday, as Purdue
hosts Indiana in one of the most (if not most) intense college
basketball rivalries in the country... 8:30 pm Central Time with Dick
and Mike...
In the interesting stat department, of the 18 conference games played so
far, the road team has only won three times: Purdue and Ohio State at
Northwestern, and Ohio State at Michigan. This in contrast to some
recent seasons where The Road Warrior has existed...
Saturday's Results:
#64 MINNESOTA 79, #42 Iowa 77: The Gophers and Hawkeyes reversed
cliffhanger roles from last Thursday night, as Dana Jackson tipped
in a missed driving shot by Arriel McDonald, over Acie Earl, with
just 1.3 ticks left to win it for Minnesota. The Hawkeyes blew a
43-31 halftime lead as the Gophers averted losing their third
straight home game. This was Iowa's 13th straight Big Ten road
loss, a rather remarkable streak which should end soon I would
think. The Gophers won this one from the field, scoring four more
treys than Iowa. The Hawkeyes took 28 FTs to just 11 for Minnesota,
but missed 8 of them. Kevin Lynch led the Gophers with 26 points,
while Walter Bond had 17. Jackson had 10. Iowa was led by Val
Barnes (a juco, in case some of you don't know him; you will soon)
with 24, and Earl had 17. 16,555 raucaus fans on hand at The Barn...
#24 MICHIGAN STATE 66, #241 Northwestern 59: The Spartans struggled
all game against a Wilcat team which had just been beaten by Indiana
and Ohio State by a combined 81 points. The Spartans led by only
six at the break and still only by four within the final few
minutes, but hung on. Steve Smith led MSU with 23 points and Mike
Peplowski, who may be waking up, had 17 points and 11 boards. Todd
Leslie had 22 for NU in what can be considered a moral victory.
Another sellout of 15,138 at the Breslin Center...
#5 OHIO STATE 92, #68 Wisconsin 60: After playing it Wisconsin's way
in the first half (slow), the Buckeyes forced the second half
action and routed the Badgers. Leading just 32-25 at the break, the
Buckeyes opened huge second half leads, once of 82-48. OSU scored
the final 8 points of the first half and the first 9 of the second
half to decide this game. Jim Jackson had 7 of his 17 during this
stretch. Perry Carter scored 18 and Treg Lee and Jamaal Brown each
had 13. Mark Baker had 11 assists to go with 11 points. Wisconsin
was led by the baseball players' son, Larry Hisle, with 12. OSU was
only whistled 9 times in this game. Another sellout of 13,276 at
St. Johns Arena...
#33 PURDUE 86, #69 Michigan 69: This was blowout city as the
Wolverines dropped their fourth straight conference game. Purdue
jumped ahead 10-5, and Michigan closed to 10-9. But that's as close
as it ever got. Purdue led 19-12, 33-19, 35-27, and then 46-31 at
the break. The rout continued in the second half, as Purdue raced
ahead 62-37, and at the peak, 69-43, before Michigan hit several
treys in the final five minutes to narrow the gap to it's final
margin. Purdue had nearly a dozen dunks in this game, as it had no
trouble beating a porous Michigan defense. Jimmy Oliver hit a
career-high 35 points as the Boilermakers ran wild. Demetrius
Calip was a one-man show for a beleaguered Steve Fisher, scoring 26
and being the only Wolverine in double-figures (second straight
Purdue opponent to do so). Michael Talley was next highest at 9.
Eric Riley was outplayed by Craig Riley, if you can believe that.
Chuckie White continued his tear, scoring 16, and with Oliver, led
the dunk parade. As at times last year, the Wolverines appeared to
throw in the towel once things got bad. Steve Fisher may need some
tutiledge in motivation from Bo.. This was nice for a change: each
team committed the same number of fouls (19) and took nearly the
same number of FTs (21 and 20). By comparison, in two recent
cliffhanger home wins, Illinois outshot the opposition from the line
60 to 23. 14,123 at Mackey, as always...
Tonight:
#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE 8:30 pm CST ESPN
Thursday:
#24 Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm
#42 Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
#33 Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
RECORDS:
#5 Ohio State 14-0 4-0
#6 Indiana 14-1 2-0
#24 Michigan State 10-4 3-1
#33 Purdue 10-3 2-1
#67 Illinois 12-4 2-1
#42 Iowa 13-3 2-2
#64 Minnesota 8-5 1-2
#68 Wisconsin 7-6 1-2
#69 Michigan 7-7 0-4
#241 Northwestern 5-8 0-4
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler [email protected] |
| Illinois State Water Survey or: [email protected] |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
15.18 | This is what hoop is all about | SACT41::ROSS | If war, who'll run 7-11's? | Tue Jan 15 1991 07:26 | 28 |
| Indiana beat Purdue last night 65-62 in a great game. IU charged to an
early 12-2 lead but Purdue slowly chipped away at the lead due mostly to
foul trouble on Cheaney and Anderson. After being down by 6 at the half,
Purdue battled to take the lead with about twelve minutes to go. Knight
then put Anderson and Cheaney back into the game and they took over down
the stretch, especially Anderson, hitting big shots. Purdue had a chance
to shoot for the tie when Jamaal Meeks bricked two free throws with 6 seconds
left, but the Purdue freshman guard Travis Trice fumbled the ball up the court
and never got a shot off.
Before MrT gloats too much, he should asked himself the following question,
"Which of Purdue's starters would start for IU?" When he objectively
answers that question as "None" then he should offer praise to Gene Keady
for the job he does. Keady is now 10-11 lifetime against Knight.
As for the Boilermakers, I saw a lot of good things to look forward to
next year. Cornelius McNary, Ian Stanback and recruit Glenn Robinson
should make for a very good front line. Unfortunately, the guard situation
is horrible. Barrett, Painter, Darner, and Trice have to be the weakest
set of guards in the Big 10.
For Indiana, Cheaney and Anderson did what they had to do. Damon Bailey
had a bad, invisible game. The Hoosiers played fantastic defense outside
the paint. But there's some holes there that the foul trouble exposed.
Lyndon Jones just doesn't have it. Nover and Lawson are forgettable.
Meeks is trying a little too hard to pretend he's Quinn Buckner.
A great game.
|
15.19 | Could be very tough come March | SHALOT::HUNT | Bippity Boppity Boo | Tue Jan 15 1991 09:48 | 10 |
| I saw the first 10 minutes of the game when Indiana built up the early
10 point lead over Purdue.
My initial thought was that Knight has the studs to make a run at the
title *THIS* year.
It is definitely to Keady's credit that the Boilermakers were able to
come back enough to make it a tight game.
Bob Hunt
|
15.20 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:03 | 33 |
| Which Purdue players would start for IU? Oliver at forward and any
one of Riley, Stanback, or McNary at center. Definitely, without a
shred of doubt, Nover and Lawson would end up 4th & 5th on the depth
chart behind any of Keady's big men. As for Oliver, he's stronger
around the hoop than Cheaney, who ideally should be playing the big,
or shooting, guard position.
As I predicted in November, Bob was trying to develop either of his
stiff middlemen (Nover is actually a scrub foward thrust into the
role out of necessity) and when it came time to play for the games that
count - i.e., Big10 clashes, where no money-grubbing post-season
redundancies exist, thankfully - he'd go with his best five players
and thus a 3-guard offense. And so it was, with 6-0 Meeks, 6-1 Jones
and 6-2 Bailey starting along with Cheaney and Anderson in hopes of
successfully running a transition game against a much bigger and
stronger Purdue lineup.
It didn't work, however, with the little guys unable to keep up on the
boards or play defense along the baseline. Often, even without switch
offs, Purdue was posting up much bigger players for easy buckets. This
especially hurt Bailey of the alleged 39" vertical leap, who for that
reason sat out most of the game. Even then, with the bigger Pat Graham
and Chris Reynolds in, the Hoosiers went nearly 9 minutes without a
field goal not cuz a poor shooting but cuz they were badly intimidated
inside, either flubbing or flinching or taking facials by the much more
athletic players like Chuckie White, Oliver, Stanback et al.
The Hoosiers, supposedly the third best team in the nation and one of
the deepest, went 4 or 5 minutes without even getting off a decent shot
cuz they were overmatched.
Big10 Tom
|
15.21 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:18 | 47 |
| Last night's game showed the weaknesses and strengths of Indiana.
This is not a top10 team. But, on the bright side, except for poor
rebounding are a great defensive team, especially when Bailey is on
the bench in favor of either Meeks or Reynolds. They D well, pass
well, transition well, execute well, and with most lineups they use
usually shoot fairly well.
While the new wave of college hoops is transition, to play that the
prototype team calls for a raft of positionless clones basically
comprised of 6-5 to 6-7 jumping jacks who cain dribble and run. This
is so cuz you must be able to rebound in order to run. IU's flaw is
that they cain' rebound enough to run enough to compensate for what
they give up to bigger teams in the walk-up game. They need either a
center or a couple of highly athletic positionless clones.
The Hoosier squad is very unwieldy from a lineup/matchup standpoint,
and when analyzed by position shows a startling lack of depth. When
graded by quality (e.g., a foward who cain survive against a B-forward
like Chuckie White, who looked like Larry Johnson last night) this is
apparent:
DEPTH BY QUALITY RANK
Power forward: 1. Eric Anderson
2.
3.
Small forward: 1. Calbert Cheaney
2. Pat Graham
3.
Center: 1.
2.
3.
Point Guard: 1. Jamaal Meeks
2. Chris Reynolds
3. Damon Bailey
4. Lyndon Jones
Nover, Lawson, Gregg Graham, and Pat Knight are not good enough right
now to survive against big-fast-talented players at their respective
postions. (Remember, this has to do with a #3 team that supposedly has
a legitimate shot at the Title.)
Big10 Tom
|
15.22 | Purdue talent summed up nicely: P-U! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:20 | 9 |
| Yup Doug, everybody should start singing the praises of Mean Gene cause
he can't do the absolute most important thing a coach has to do:
RECRUIT.
What a guy! What a coach!! What a team!!!
- ACC Chris
|
15.23 | | SACT41::ROSS | Dick Clark's Rockin' Iraq Eve | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:20 | 22 |
| > Which Purdue players would start for IU? Oliver at forward and any
> one of Riley, Stanback, or McNary at center.
Made my day, MrT. That has to be the funniest thing you've ever written.
Riley is the worst center Purdue has had in ten years. Stanback looked
good, but is a frosh with no range and a 45% shooter at the line. McNary
is a raw talent. But no way ANY of them would start for Bob... no way.
Oliver would only start if you move Cheaney to guard, even though Cheaney
is taller and a better rebounder... He's a legit small forward.
> It didn't work, however, with the little guys unable to keep up on the
> boards or play defense along the baseline. Often, even without switch
All that kept Purdue in the game was the foul trouble on Anderson and Cheaney
and also the fact that Anderson did not assert himself on offense until crunch
time.
You heard Vitale. Judd Heathcoate said that Keady gets more out of his
"talent" than any coach in the country. And his 10-11 record against
Knight is amazing.
|
15.24 | Analysis | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:32 | 55 |
| ANALYSIS
ThunderBurp's departure left a gaping hole that has not been covered.
Bailey's outside shooting and jumping ability is a big disappointment.
Pat Graham washed out as a big shooting guard but has carved out a
nice niche for himself as a good backup small forward who drives and
shoots well but gives up something on D. Nover is hopeless, he has no
basketball instincts and is always out of position for rebounds. The
squad needs to develop more outside shooting from someone. Because of
the depth problems playing Eric Anderson in the middle won't work cuz
he'll end up in foul trouble every time against big, strong, deep front
lines like Purdue's.
RECOMMENDATION:
Play Lawson and let him develop. He saved IU's ass last night, bringing
in some D and some O and a few boards in the middle, and letting Eric
either sit or play his natural postion. Also, when Henderson comes in
next year this will allow Cheaney to move to shooting guard and give the
Hoosiers a clear shot at Title No. 6.
Scrap Bailey for Reynolds at the, who is much quicker, a much better
defender, plays much bigger (leaping and arm length), drives better, and
shoots at least as well from the outside. Play Meeks at point, where he
makes few mistakes, passes as well as Bailey overall, and plays much
better D.
Rotate in as first subs Pat Graham at small forward, Nover at big forward
or center, Bailey at point, and Jones at shooting guard.
Experiment and maybe develop Pat Graham at small forward with Cheaney
at big guard. If that worked and Lawson maintained serviceability IU
could then be scary.
Big10 Tom's starting lineup:
F - Anderson
F - Cheaney
C - Lawson
G - Reynolds
G - Meeks
I think we may see this lineup eventually.
Also, congrat's to the Pudue alumni for a superb job at poor mouthing
this year. They have more muscle along the stripe that any team in the
Big10 and Keady knows it. When I first saw Riley I said, "surely he's
a stiff who cain't shoot the rock." Surprise, Riley drilled a number of
consecutive baskets to keep Purdue in the game down the stretch.
Shame on Keady for failing to exploit Oliver's great talent last night
(only 11 pts.); and shame on the referees for dishing out some of the
coldest home cooking seen in the Big10 in years.
Big10 Tom
|
15.25 | | SACT41::ROSS | Dick Clark's Rockin' Iraq Eve | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:34 | 26 |
| > Yup Doug, everybody should start singing the praises of Mean Gene cause
> he can't do the absolute most important thing a coach has to do:
>
> RECRUIT.
Huh? I know you know that he's already bagged one of the top five in the
country, Glenn Robinson. McNary, Stanback, and {to a lesser degree, Trice}
all look like good players.
If you consider the bagging of big name players who then sit on the bench
as a positive, then you're right, Keady can't recruit.
If you consider taking lesser blue chip players and molding them into great
teams a negative, then you're right, Keady can't recruit.
If you consider setting academic standards higher than those of the NCAA
and Big 10 and then trying to find players who fit that mold as a negative,
then you're right, Keady can't recruit.
If you call recruiting within spitting distance of Bob Knight and Notre Dame
and not always getting the best players in the state as a negative, then
you're right, Keady can't recruit.
Coming from a supporter of a coach whose had Michael Jordan, Brad Daugherty,
Sam Perkins, James Worthy, Phil Ford, et al pass thru with only a single
title to his credit, I'd wonder why you'd consider recruiting a big deal.
|
15.26 | 1-15-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:59 | 96 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-15-91) NCAA
Date: 15 Jan 91 05:44:17 GMT
I'm doing this very early, with rum in hand, since I have to dodge
snowflakes to repair raingages in Chicago tomorrow (today). Tell me,
when is Purdue going to get a clue in the final few minutes of a game?
It doesn't get any easier for them in Gopher Country Thursday. Well,
the rum is good, anyway...
Tonight's Result:
#6 Indiana 65, #33 PURDUE 62: Purdue got alot of help from the
"Sixth Man", but they didn't help themselves much in the final five
minutes again as poised IU won it's 13th straight game. IU started
out the game on fire, nailing three treys and leading 16-4 before
Purdue knew what hit them (they looked really tight). The Boilers
cut the lead to 22-13 before IU went up 26-16. Purdue then got the
Hoosiers into serious foul trouble, particularly Calbert Cheaney and
Eric Anderson, and went to the locker room down only 6, 37-31.
Purdue then scored 9 of the first 13 second half points and drew to
41-40. It was within this period that both Cheaney and Anderson
drew their fourth fouls. IU subs quickly regained a 6-point, 46-40
lead, but Chuckie White went spastic and Purdue took it's first lead
at 49-48 around the 10 minute mark. Purdue held this lead for many
minutes, with leads of up to four points at 52-48 and lastly at
58-54. Amazingly, both Anderson and Cheaney came back into the game
together, and neither drew another foul in leading IU back to
victory. The two scored nearly all of IU's points the rest of the
way, Anderson hitting a bunch of tough J's. IU scored seven
straight to lead 61-58, partially fueled by some awful Purdue shot
selection and the typically ridiculous Dave Barrett telegraph
pass/turnovers. Purdue drew back to 61-60, but IU hit a shot to go
up 63-60 and then Pat Graham nailed two FTs to make the lead 65-60.
Matt Painter then hit a duece to make it 65-62 under the :10 mark,
and then we were entertained by several timeouts and aborted inbound
attempts. Jamaal Meeks was fouled with 6+ ticks left, and he
responded under pressure with two absolute bricks. But, Jimmy
Oliver, who had a terrible game under extreme pressure (Bob Knight
is no dummy), rebounded and passed off to a freshman, Travis Trice,
with a confused look on his face, instead of going for it himself.
Trice promptly forgot how to dribble once he crossed the time line
and IU won without Purdue even taking a shot. Chuckie White, who
scored 17 and pulled down 10 boards, took an ill-advised shot in the
final two minutes, as did bricklayer Painter. Ian Stanback was
tremenous on the boards, and Purdue seemed to lose some zip when he
left the game late for several minutes after being elbowed by Craig
Riley. Even though Anderson and Cheaney picked up a few pine
splinters, they led the Hoosiers in scoring with 15 and 14,
respectively, in a hard-earned win. Another sellout of 14,123 saw
Purdue lose for the third time this year by 3 or less after leading
late, twice already in this young Big Ten season. This was the
first game that new IU-East student Woody Austin was missed...
Thursday:
#24 Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm
#42 Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
#33 Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#64 Minnesota at #24 MICHIGAN STATE Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#69 Michigan at #68 WISCONSIN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#67 Illinois at # 5 OHIO STATE 7:00 pm
# 6 Indiana at #42 IOWA 7:00 pm
Next Monday:
# 5 Ohio State at #6 INDIANA 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
5 4 Ohio State 14-0 4-0
6 3 Indiana 15-1 3-0
24 26 Michigan State 10-4 3-1
67 36 Illinois 12-4 2-1
42 24 Iowa 13-3 2-2
33 40 Purdue 10-4 2-2
64 44 Minnesota 8-5 1-2
68 NR Wisconsin 7-6 1-2
69 NR Michigan 7-7 0-4
241 NR Northwestern 5-8 0-4
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler [email protected] |
| Illinois State Water Survey or: [email protected] |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
15.27 | but could she stop a runaway train in its tracks? | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:01 | 39 |
|
First off: The most important, overriding fack that I, as a_alum of
Indiana, would like to focus, even dwell, on, is:
Mrs. Keady
That's right, Mrs. Gene Keady. 'Nuff said, don't you think? Whoa.
Runaway truck, shovel, house fire maybe? It's a mystery to me, but
all I cain say is: Mrs. Keady. Haw haa hee gnhee (tm) !!
Mrs. Gene Keady. Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs.
Keady. Ha ha haaa. Mrs. *Keady*. Ho ho ho.
'Nuff said. Mrs. Keady.
*****
Say what you want, Dougie, but the fack remains that any one of those
three players would be starting in the middle for the Hoosiers in a
minute. You cain just as easily say that no way ever would a Nover or
a Lawson be starting for Knight but they have.
You axed the question and I gave a_answer that stands up to reality:
No way could Bob keep Oliver off the floor (move him to guard, he's
MUCH more talented than any of the 3 who started last night); and Riley
looked pretty decent to me. He put a nifty move on Anderson moving to
the hoop for a layup, and he popped a few nice little Js, but most of
all he - along with White and Stanback and McNary - intimidated the
smaller Hoosiers out of several easy shots.
Keady's doing a fine job with a spotty, young team; but so is Bob.
Mene Gene has 4 bucks he cain throw at you up front, IU has 2. On the
other hand Bob has 6 guards, Mene Gene only 1 or 2. If they played ten
games Purdue would win at least 3 or 4 of them cuz Keady (ever the
whiner) has some things that the alleged #3 Hoosiers clearly lack.
Big10 Tom
|
15.28 | | SACT41::ROSS | Dick Clark's Rockin' Iraq Eve | Tue Jan 15 1991 13:00 | 3 |
| Is Mrs. Gene Keady that black haired, leather-skinned, social x-ray we
saw on camera for what seemed like minutes in the second half? If so,
then all I can say is that Gene better hope the kids look like him.
|
15.29 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | AD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Tue Jan 15 1991 13:31 | 22 |
| Oh come ON Doug don't pretend that you don't know now !!
Yes yes YES that black haired, leather-skinned, social x-ray in
the Holiday Inn Lounge Lizard slatternly get-up that we were forced
view repeatedly is Gene's wife, and now you know why he's so doggoned
Mene.
ESPN must have some fun dudes on their crews, cuz whenever Purdue
plays the remarkable Mrs. Keady gets major camera time haw haw haw haa.
Btw, you should send Dickie a thank-u note for failing to comment on
the wildly biased officiating last nite.
And, as for your poor mouthing, just let me say that Riley had the body
that I had envisioned when I first read that IU had signed a peckerwood
center two eyars ago. He's very strong, and coordinated. Ditto for
McNary who also has some other tools. Stanback could be a star as early
as next year. But apparently you consider Lawson and Nover as being at
some level of preparation other than "raw" haw haw haw.
Big10 Tom
|
15.30 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:02 | 4 |
| Is it true that T and Ross surreptitiously purloined Lou Holtz' book and
have taken several pages from it?
Mike JN
|
15.31 | | SACT41::ROSS | Dick Clark's Rockin' Iraq Eve | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:58 | 52 |
| > Oh come ON Doug don't pretend that you don't know now !!
I honestly didn't. I may have seen her on a tv game before, but it never
registered that she was that nasty looking. I hope Gene is getting a little
action on the side from the Girl in Black or the Silver Twins....
> ESPN must have some fun dudes on their crews, cuz whenever Purdue
> plays the remarkable Mrs. Keady gets major camera time haw haw haw haa.
And Dickie Vitale is always commenting on how great she is... Must be looking
out of his blind eye...
> Btw, you should send Dickie a thank-u note for failing to comment on
> the wildly biased officiating last nite.
You mean the ones that kept Anderson and Cheaney in the game with four
fouls each for the final 13 minutes? The refs were typical Big 10 - bad
both ways... and it hurts the Big 10 later because they let SO much stuff
go... that come tournament time, the boys can't adjust. {Watch and see
if the Big East's expirement with 6 fouls this year hurts later on}.
> And, as for your poor mouthing, just let me say that Riley had the body
> that I had envisioned when I first read that IU had signed a peckerwood
> center two eyars ago. He's very strong, and coordinated.
You've gotta be kidding! Riley is a stiff... a plodding, oafish, stiff.
He makes Stephen Scheffler look like David Robinson. Riley averages
3.5 points a game and had a career high 10 yesterday {4 of them when
guarded by Anderson with four fouls} and you're talking like he's the
next Kent Benson. I don't remember him grabbing more than a couple
boards. Plus he's a senior! A fifth year, I think! And now he's
"developing"????? He's a stiff.
And as for poor mouthing, it's because this year's team is lousy.
Two years ago when Troy Lewis, Everette Stephens, and Todd Mitchell were
in there, nobody was saying "they bite". And I have high expectations
for next year and even higher for the year after. 1992-93 should be
another Big 10 championship year for Keady... especially if he can find
a guard who can knock down the jumper.
>Lawson and Nover as being at some level of preparation other than "raw"
I would say Lawson and Riley are about equal - Indiana cornfed farmboys
who'll probably be driving Paw's John Deere in about 4 months. Nover is
nothing but raw. Yes, they needed a Funderburke to be a sure-thing Final
Four team. But they play well enough to be a possible Final Four team.
The point you miss is that IU has 2 of the top five players in the Big 10,
a very steady set of guards, great team defense, and Bob Knight. Purdue
has Jimmy Oliver {a second-tier Big 10 star}, a couple raw freshmen, and
Gene Keady. They'll win 50% in the Big 10 on guts alone... and that just
might get them in the tournament....
|
15.32 | | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Tue Jan 15 1991 16:00 | 7 |
|
Doug, Big East also had the 6 foul rule last year and didn't seem to hurt
them in the tournment. I don't recall anyone fouling out in the tournment
or coaches having to drastically change their rotations to protect players.
mike
|
15.33 | Purdue loses to IU at home haw haw haw | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Tue Jan 15 1991 16:03 | 4 |
| Balderdash, Ross. You've cut loose a all Reality. And you're not a
gracious Loser I might add.
Big10 Tom
|
15.34 | Bob, You Make My Heart Throb | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | AD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Wed Jan 16 1991 17:02 | 15 |
| Bob Knight just HAS to be a shoo-in for Big10 CoTY right now!
Think a it: Bob has no center, no shooting guard, poor depth, no
front-line widebody muscle-'bounds, a very very young team hurt by
a highly-touted recruit who's washing out... and yet he's, what?,
13-1 and 3-1 and #3.
True, the Hoosiers will slide once they hit the road against the
tougher squads, and will probably slide as low as the high teens,
but, hey, they've got a shot at 2nd in the conference and will
surely make the tournament.
Is it too early for kudos here? No, I think not: Kudos Bob!
Big10 Tom
|
15.35 | Gettin' way to deep for me... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Just this beer, then one more... | Wed Jan 16 1991 17:26 | 1 |
|
|
15.36 | yawn | EARRTH::BROOKS | Psssst .... Elvis is dead. | Thu Jan 17 1991 00:14 | 1 |
|
|
15.37 | :^) | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Thu Jan 17 1991 09:16 | 6 |
|
Let him beat Randy Ayers' teams first then we can talk....
mike
|
15.38 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Jan 17 1991 12:36 | 9 |
| I don't know, T....
I've only seen Indy twice this year, but whether it's chemistry and
coaching, or talent.... they look like they could be a contendah!
Things are just starting, and I'm lookin forward to NCAA Tournament
already!
Mike JN
|
15.39 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | If war, who'll man the 7-11s? | Thu Jan 17 1991 14:57 | 16 |
| I must be losing my mind. I coulda swore that poor Bob started
three guards, a swingman, and a shooting forward at center the
other night! And I musta hallucinated about the supposedly #3
Hoosiers being dominated on the boards by 15 and having several
insides shots either blocked or given up on.
Reality check: The present IU squad will fold like a cheap tent
against the likes of Arkansas or several other teams ranked
below them right now. This is as good as it gets at #3, from
here on it's all downhill.
This is a very talented but one-dimensional fatally flawed IU team
that'll end up losing several games and bowing out in the 2nd round
of the NCAA tourney.
MrObjectivityInSportsAnalysis
|
15.40 | Ross is the Boss! (in this note, anyway) | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The elbow is part of the ball | Fri Jan 18 1991 11:26 | 4 |
| I get a feeling that MrT will poor-mouth IU's talent until the day
Knight starts 5 NBA All Stars.
Dan
|
15.41 | | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Fri Jan 18 1991 12:05 | 7 |
|
How about them Badgers? Anyone give us a rundown on them? Blew Iowa
away at home last night. Didn't see as much as would have like because
of the war. Do we have a little guy here ready to knock heads with the
big guys of Big ten/eleven/fifteen?
mike
|
15.42 | | SACT41::ROSS | Deadly, when I play a dope melody | Mon Jan 21 1991 10:09 | 19 |
| Big game tonight...
#3 Ohio State versus #4 Indiana at Bloomington, IN... ESPN... 9:30
Indiana blew out Iowa at Iowa Saturday... it was close for awhile.
Indiana must win. The Big 10 title usually involves winning all {maybe one
loss} at home and beating all the bad teams on the road and splitting with
the good ones {Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Illinois}. The
matchup I'm looking forward to is Jimmy Jackson vs Calbert Cheaney. Two of
the three best players in the league {both soph's}. Knight needs to find
someone to keep Perry Carter off the boards... hopefully, Anderson will show
some guts tonight.
Purdue lost again Saturday. They've lost by one at Illinois, by three to
Indiana, and by a couple at Minnesota. Losing the close ones points directly
to their guards - the weakest bunch in the Big 10. Is it still poormouthing to
call a 2-3 team lousy?
|
15.43 | OSU's guards quickness maybe the difference... | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Mon Jan 21 1991 10:51 | 12 |
|
And Ohio State blew out Illinois 89-55 on saturday so both teams are ready.
Actually Doug, I'd look for Lawson to pull a surprise here and play well
enough to off-set Carter. He lacks consistency but has played big in a couple
of big games he's been involved in and will have a slight height advantage..
first game of the night is SU/Georgetown so it has all the makings of one
of the best Big Mondays in a long time. 7:30 est.
and for the nighthawks and west coaster UNLV/UCSB at midnight...
mike
|
15.44 | | SACT41::ROSS | Deadly, when I play a dope melody | Mon Jan 21 1991 11:10 | 16 |
| > first game of the night is SU/Georgetown so it has all the makings of one
> of the best Big Mondays in a long time. 7:30 est.
> and for the nighthawks and west coaster UNLV/UCSB at midnight...
Wow! We'll see #1, #3, #4 and whatever Syracuse is... and enough guys
to fill out two All-America teams:
Larry Johnson Stacy Augmon
Billy Owens ???? Anderson {drew a blank!}
Dikembe Mutoumbo Alonzo Mourning
Calbert Cheaney Anderson Hunt
Jimmy Jackson Damon Bailey {;-)}
Stompshin, BayWhine, BoobKnight,The Shirk!
This is why God created ESPN!
|
15.45 | blank fill: Eric...agreed on espn | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Mon Jan 21 1991 11:23 | 0 |
15.46 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:33 | 3 |
|
OSU by 6... bank on it!
|
15.47 | | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:33 | 23 |
| This is the best Big Monday I cain remember. And on ESPN so no rude
interruptions by self-seeking war reporters anxious to explain what
they haven't seen, don't know, aren't sure of, or have already told you
several hundred times!
>Indiana must win.
Absolutely correct. Only in the Big10, the dinosaur league that yet
allows its fans a meaningful championship season fraught with early
season tension, is this adrenaline-pumping pleasure possible.
I'm buzzed already. If Indiana gags tonight it's a dog fight for 2nd
place baby! Michigan State has regained its form, with Peplowski on
a roll now, they mainhandled Minnesota until the very end, and then
held them off with superior beef.
>is it still poormouthing...
Oh why don't you CAN IT buddy. Minnesota's relatively dangerous. And
perhaps it's time for us to review Mene Gene's coaching. Btw, Bob is
winning his haid-to-haid with him.
Big10 Tom
|
15.48 | Big Monday ends after IU beats OSU. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:36 | 20 |
| Yea, I've been thinking about tonights "Big Monday" (not to mention
clearly my schedule from 7:30pm until ???) and it really makes me
appreciate the NCAA Tournament.
Ya see, we've got four (4) teams in the top 10 (approx) unabashedly
going at each other, mano-a-mano. Two will win; two will lose. Then
they'll pick up and go at some other Top 20 team next game.
Meanwhile UNLV, who everyone knows could beat the Nuggets on a bad
night (*their* bad night, not Westhaid's bunch) playing (gasp) *Santa
Barbara*. YAWN.
It's unfortunate that such a talented bunch can only battle the best a
handful of times each year, and what's more, me_thinks their woeful
schedule will cost them a Title. They lucked out last year against
Ball State, but, IMHO, will get knocked off by somebody this year,
probably before the Final 4.
- ACC Chris
|
15.49 | Wisconsin | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:43 | 29 |
| >How about them Badgers.
Excellent question. I've been meaning to write on them but what with
the race war in the Gulf I'VE BEEN BUSY.
I'd liken the Badgers to Kaintuck. Against the Hawkeyes they shot an
eye-popping 11-for-17 from The Land Of Trey. Anybody who saw the CBS
game Saturday against Michigan should take care to not be mislead:
Yoder purposefully held back on the 3-pointers in order to exploit the
Wolve's woeful lack of inside strength.
Ellenson, Douglass, Hisle, and especially Locum cain flat put it down
from afar. They also are fairly quick, and usually will run run run
what with their "big" guys being 6-6 jumping jack Willie Simms (their
best player) and 6-6 Patrick Tompskins (the ultimate nuclear widebody,
his bod makes Perry Carter and The Round Mound Of Rebound look like
hair stylists clipping locks at Chez Bruce, beauty salon for men).
But Yoder may have sealed his fate losing at home like he did Saturday.
What made it worse was how ultra-stupe Fisher did it: with 3 seconds
left and Wisconsin in the backcourt a guard raced over and fouled the
Badger's best free throw shooter, Hisle (1), and Fisher went to ice
him with a TO but in a frenzy of bench disorganization reminiscent of
Jim BayWhine failed to call it in time.
Wisconsin still has a shot at the Big10's fourth spot in the tourney.
The word in Mad City is that Yoder either cops it or he's done.
Big10 Tom
|
15.50 | | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:49 | 23 |
| I might say that I'm quite pleased that Bob took my advice to
heart and made the lineup changes I detailed for him last week.
Bob has apparently made the decision to dump the hapless Matt
Nover and stick with the short-armed-but-6-10 redhaid Chris Lawson
in the paint. That's good. Also, he's given a central role to
his best overall guard Chris Reynolds, who's a_awesome defender
and cain drive to the hoops so sweet, teaming him up with Jamaal
Meeks and diminishing the PT of the horridly overhyped Damon.
Now, if he'd just insist that Calbert haid fake more on his outside
J from the standstill and drive to the hoop like only he cain, this
squad could be ship-shape.
I wouldn't be surprised if Bob puts Eric Anderon on Jim Jackson.
Re: Big Monday
The nicest thing about Big Monday is that it's the only day of the
week we're not facing several ACC games on the tube. Also, UCSB is
thought to be UNLV's toughest conference game.
Big10 Tom
|
15.51 | | CAM::WAY | Bo don't know which one's Vanilli | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:53 | 9 |
| � I might say that I'm quite pleased that Bob took my advice to
� heart and made the lineup changes I detailed for him last week.
T, do you have a hotline to the Great One, (a la the President and
Gorby?) or do you just send him tips from time to time ;^)
Enquiring and all that
'Saw
|
15.52 | | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 21 1991 13:02 | 15 |
|
>do you have a hotline to the Great One,
I send him a Federal Express package containing my thoughts after
each game witnessed by me. Xs & Os type stuff too complicated to
go into here.
We used to speak on the phone quite a lot, but that hasn't happened
since after the University of Richmond game...
He *did* send me a letter this fall after the big Thanksgiving Feast
final victory on the Bob vs. Dean debate congratulating me and saying
how proud of me he was, however.
Big10 Tom
|
15.53 | | CAM::WAY | Go get yourself some cheap sunglasses | Mon Jan 21 1991 13:10 | 17 |
| > I send him a Federal Express package containing my thoughts after
> each game witnessed by me. Xs & Os type stuff too complicated to
> go into here.
I'm impressed. Good choice, Federal Express. I saw a lot on the
games this weekend that Fed Ex is out to make you have a nice day.
I'll bet Bob appreciates that personal touch.
> He *did* send me a letter this fall after the big Thanksgiving Feast
> final victory on the Bob vs. Dean debate congratulating me and saying
> how proud of me he was, however.
Which I'm sure is displayed prominantly in your home...
Congrats!
'Saw
|
15.54 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3 | Mon Jan 21 1991 13:13 | 10 |
| > Also, UCSB is
> thought to be UNLV's toughest conference game.
I think most would consider UNLV's toughest conference game to be at New
Mexico State. They are currently ranked 21st.
Joe
|
15.55 | Murphy Brown | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Mon Jan 21 1991 13:32 | 12 |
|
UNLV has a non-conference game with Arkansas left on their schedule. This
will be a tough game no matter what even tougher if it's at Arkansas.
Agreed T, I've been touting Lawson since I saw him in the Maui Classic.
I also remember the monster he had last year agianst Lou-do's jumping
jacks.
mike_who'll_be_in_the_cellar_tonight_while_the_wife_watches_the_classic_bitch
|
15.56 | 1-18-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Jan 21 1991 18:39 | 117 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-18-91) NCAA
Date: 18 Jan 91 19:19:44 GMT
This league is indeed shaping up as the Big 3 and the Little 7, as
Michigan State joined the other two big boys (IU and OSU) at the top of
the conference, and really, should do nothing but get better. The
Little 7 can probably be divided into Illinois/Purdue/Minnesota/Iowa,
plus maybe Wisconsin or Michigan, and then Northwestern at the end...
Thursday's Results:
#43 Michigan State 71, #62 ILLINOIS 68: The tables turned on
Illinois as it was the team which blew a big lead and lost near the
end. The Illini had a great first half, running off to a 37-27 lead
at the break. The lead balooned to 14 early in the second half
(41-27) after two Deon Thomas shots, but then the Spartans started
chipping away as Steve Smith did his damage (he scored 35 points).
It was just 52-50 Illinois at the 11:54 mark. The Illini got a
three point play from Rennie Clemons, then went over 8 minutes
before scoring another field goal. By that time, State was up by
four. Illinois pulled within two with 1:21 left, and with :33 left,
Steve Smith was called for traveling with MSU up 67-64. Andy Kpedi
nailed two free throws with :15.4 left, but Matt Steigenga answered
with two of his own with :13.4 left for a 69-66 lead. Clemons made
a layup with 7 seconds left, but Smith finished the scoring with two
free throws at the 6 second mark. The Illini did not get much of a
shot off at the end. Mark Montgomery had 12 for MSU, while Clemons
led Illinois with 17 and Andy Kaufmann had 16. 11,504 showed at the
Hall...
#67 WISCONSIN 91, #49 Iowa 79: Blowout City!!! Wisconsin exploded
to a 42-27 halftime edge on some great shooting, much from 6'7" John
Ellenson (he was 4-5 from trifecta land in the first half). Iowa
put on a second half rally which got them as close as 80-68 with
4:32 left (and the final score, of course), but Wisconsin then went
on an 11-2 run to salt the game away finally (91-70). This was
Iowa's 14th straight Big Ten road loss. Tim Locum whistled the nets
for 25 points, including 5 for 6 treys. Ellenson had 21, Willie
Simms 15, and Patrick Tompkins and Larry Hisle each had 12. Iowa
was led by Val Barnes' 19 and Acie Earl's 12. Wisconsin shot 34-57
from the field. 10,362 approved of the proceedings...
#57 MICHIGAN 79, #234 Northwestern 68: Michigan struggled for a
while but then pulled away to beat the Cats. NU led 33-32 at the
break after Michigan had led 14-8. The Wildcats led by as much as
27-22. But, Michigan ripped out early in the second half (Steve
Fisher must have given a rousing halftime speech), and before you
knew it the Wolverines were up 47-35 with 14:22 left. Northwestern
made various runs thereafter, but Michigan was never really in
danger of losing. They whipped the Cats on the boards 34-18.
Demetrius Calip had 22 points, Kirk Taylor 21 and Eric Riley 13 for
Michigan. Don Brotz had 19 for Bill Foster and Todd Leslie 18.
10,548 were on hand in Ann Arbor...
#55 MINNESOTA 59, #32 Purdue 56: Purdue once again came up a day
late and a dollar short, this time at Minneapolis. But they are in
every game until the end. That's good enough, isn't it??? Last
night, the Boilers held a 47-45 lead with just 2:51 remaining.
That's when 35% shooter Arriel McDonald took over, hitting
the tying shot, the go-ahead shot, another shot and all of his
freebies. In fact, the Gophers hit 14 of 15 second half charity
tosses, not bad for a team which shoots just 68% from the line.
Even the Gopher fans will agree that this was one of the most poorly
played Big Ten contests they've seen in a long time. The halftime
score was 20-20, as both Kevin Lynch and Jimmy Oliver, the two "Top
Guns" of their respective teams, shot airballs and generally looked
awful. Minnesota once led by 7 in the first half (17-10) in just a
pathetic display of basketball. Purdue scored the final four points
of the first half to forge the tie, then hit the first five of the
second half and you got the feeling that someone was finally taking
charge. But, the Gophers quickly closed to 27-26, and the lead then
changed hands most of the way until McDonald's flurry. The Gophers
went ahead 53-48 before Purdue closed to 55-53 on an Oliver
trey. The Gophers then went up 59-53, on free throws, when Jimmy
Oliver banked in a 35-foot prayer at the horn (why didn't he do that
Monday night?). McDonald scored 10 of his 12 points in the final
2:01. Lynch ended up 2-13 from the floor, and Oliver was 5-16, as
both teams shot well below 50%. Purdue was an incredible 5 for 23
from three-point land. Not running much offense lately, Gene...
Craig Riley was the only bright spot, scoring 19 on 7-10 shooting
and 5-5 from the stripe, if you can believe that. Purdue's guards
were a combined 3 for 16 from the field and scored only 9 points.
Keady got the obligatory T, but Minnesota only got one point out of
it. 15,058 fans were happy, but relieved to go home after this one...
Saturday:
#55 Minnesota at #43 MICHIGAN STATE Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#57 Michigan at #67 WISCONSIN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#62 Illinois at # 3 OHIO STATE 7:00 pm
# 5 Indiana at #49 IOWA 7:00 pm
#234 Northwestern at NORTHEASTERN
Monday:
# 3 Ohio State at #5 INDIANA 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
3 4 Ohio State 14-0 4-0
5 3 Indiana 15-1 3-0
43 26 Michigan State 11-4 4-1
62 36 Illinois 12-5 2-2
55 44 Minnesota 9-5 2-2
67 NR Wisconsin 8-6 2-2
49 24 Iowa 13-4 2-3
32 40 Purdue 10-5 2-3
57 NR Michigan 8-7 1-4
234 NR Northwestern 5-9 0-5
|
15.57 | | SACT41::ROSS | War, ugh, what is it good for? | Tue Jan 22 1991 08:15 | 9 |
| Ohio State beat Indiana last night 93-85. The Buckeyes pulled out to a
18 point halftime lead as the Hoosiers couldn't hit anything from the outside.
Calbert Cheaney was particularly woeful early on. In the second half, a team
of Cheaney, Greg Graham, Damon Bailey, Jamaal Meeks and Eric Anderson brought
the Hoosiers all the way back to close to 3 points. In the end, they couldn't
stop Ohio State that ONE TIME they needed to.
You know, Kenny Anderson may put the fans in the seats, but I think Jimmy
Jackson will win you more ballgames in the NBA. He was impressive.
|
15.58 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Jan 22 1991 10:31 | 4 |
|
RE: .46
So I was off by two... I knew the Bucks would come through.
|
15.59 | it's State vs. State for Big10 Crown now | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 22 1991 11:11 | 46 |
| That Bob had to give up on his stiff middlemen and go back to the
3-guard lineup is unsurprising. I think IU will want to get Lawson
PT wherever possible, but he was clearly in way over his red haid
last night with the nuclear widebody combo of Treg Lee and Perry
Carter, one time nearly missing the backboard entirely on a_attempted
bank shot that was nearly blocked.
IU is better in a 3-guard lineup cuz Lawson/Nover don't rebound anyway,
and carry a heavy cost in muffed pass receptions, stupid fouls, and
abject inability to participate in the running game.
While I was sad to see the badly overrated Hoosiers' obvious flaws so
brutally exposed, you have to credit Ohio State. Jim Jackson is a
first team All-America in my book. And as a Big10 fan it's remarkable
and pleasing to see how polished Carter and Lee are now, these guys
looked like hopeless stiffs a couple of years back, and that's great
coaching.
A wagering friend of mine loaded up heavily on the Bucks last night,
the book on IU was that they exhibited all the tell-tale signs of a
badly overrated team: 1) many comeback victories against tougher comp,
2) consistently outrebounded, 3) one dimensional (poor outside shooting),
4) caught tougher opponents at right time (Louisville, Notre Dame, U. of
Kaintuck, 5) unstable starting lineup and PT distribution...
Seeing some of the mismatches last night (Damon Bailey at forward vying
with Treg Lee and Perry Carter on the boards, for instance) pretty much
lays out the fact that the Hoosiers are naked against the quality teams
and will not compete for the Big10 Title.
I'm sticking with my prediction that the Hoosiers will finish 3rd in the
Big10 (behind Michigan State) and end up somewhere in the low teens in
the polls.
They're a small team unable to play the running game cuz they lack
widebodies, with the very unusual negative dimension that they are
susceptible to zones cuz they're poor outside shooters and to foul woes
cuz they have no depth on the front-line.
What we saw last night was the reality of Funderburke's departure and
the fack that Damon Bailey doesn't have the physical presence to ever
be a dominating player. This is a team with a truckload of point
guards and two very very sweet fowards unable to operate optimally cuz
of the lack of at least two more quality front-line talents.
Big10 Tom
|
15.60 | Fun game | SHALOT::HUNT | So much for the Peace Dividend ... | Tue Jan 22 1991 12:51 | 22 |
| That was a great game. The Buckeyes are truly loaded and they've got
Final Four written all over them.
Indiana is not as bad off as you make them out to be. They could have
used a little better free throw shooting last night, for instance. They
must have missed at least 10 charity stripers.
Calbert Cheaney is the real thing and Damon Bailey, I think, will surprise
you when he's all done in Camp Bob. He does have an awareness of the
court despite whatever physical limitations he might have. That will pay
off in the right spot at the right time someday in the future.
I also noticed that a chair violently stood there against The General's
foot. Nice to know he hasn't mellowed out too much.
Also, this was *EXACTLY* the kind of game (9:30pm tube start on a school
night) that he was bitching and moaning about a few years ago. Has he
changed that tune, too, or was he told to just shut up and play them ???
Vitale is a moron. He needs a Quaalude or ten.
Bob Hunt
|
15.61 | good game. Pat Grahman gunshy again | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Tue Jan 22 1991 13:00 | 13 |
|
Bob, he'd need atleast the 10....He's the worst part of the package
perhaps someday ESPN will realize it. Tough guy for them to give up though
cause he's friends with all the coaches and gets the tough interviewees
for them even if his questions are creampuff...
Yup great game last night. I agree with Bob on Damon and T on Lee and
Carter. I wanted to give Jackson POY of the Big ten last year for pete
sakes and he's only gotten better has Brown and everyone else.
Ayers' star is rising fast. OSU better make him a quality offer soon...
mike
|
15.62 | Ugly night in the Knorr & MrT homes! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 22 1991 14:21 | 17 |
| There I was gettin' ready for game time last night when the wife
unloads my 5-day old on me. "No problem - get some sleep." I tell her,
knowing that any son of mine is gonna love this kind of action!
Well he was fine at first, but it seemed the more the Buckeyes poured
it on in the first half, the worse he got. By halftime I was left
holding a screaming ball of flesh. Slobber was dripping down his face;
he stunk like high heaven; he was wailing like a Tel Aviv missile-alert
siren.
And then it hit me. My son was undoubtedly doing a *very* good
MrT impersonation!!!111
Haw haw haw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111
- ACC Chris
|
15.63 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | AD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Tue Jan 22 1991 14:46 | 12 |
| I'm not making them out "to be that bad." 3rd place in the Big10
and a top20 ranking is pretty good, but when you lose your top
recruit and of necessity revert to 3-guard lineups and end up losing
at home I think you see my point.
This team is dangerous when they're shooting well, and only then.
They're #3 ranking was a joke. The Hoosiers have the Spartans in
E. Lansing. The bookies have MSU winning that one, which would
then make IU a long shot for the Big10 Title and would see them
at about #15 in the polls.
Big10 Tom
|
15.64 | ESPN & Dick Vitale have had a *huge* impact on college hoops | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 22 1991 15:15 | 11 |
| Better get used to them high expectations MisterT. I distinctly recall
Dickie say last night that either IU or Duke will be his preseason #1
pick for '91-'92.
BTW, I disagree with all the anti-Vitale comments. He's extremely
knowledgeable and well-prepared. As far as I'm concerned he's *way*
above the competition (Packer, McGuire, etc.) in terms of overall
knowledge of the game, and he's always up on the recruiting wars.
- ACC Chris
|
15.65 | Yeah, but shaddup every over breath then | SHALOT::HUNT | So much for the Peace Dividend ... | Tue Jan 22 1991 15:25 | 14 |
| � BTW, I disagree with all the anti-Vitale comments. He's extremely
� knowledgeable and well-prepared. As far as I'm concerned he's *way*
� above the competition (Packer, McGuire, etc.) in terms of overall
� knowledge of the game, and he's always up on the recruiting wars.
That's fine. All well and good but does he have to scream and call him
"General Robert Montgomery Knight" fifteen times a minute ???
I mean, the man is the living epitome of the desperate need to push the
"Mute" button on remote controls all over college hoopdom.
Howard Cosell's laurels have been passed on most admirably, I'd say.
Bob Hunt
|
15.66 | | SACT41::ROSS | War, ugh, what is it good for? | Tue Jan 22 1991 15:48 | 16 |
| I also think Vitale is head and shoulders above the rest. He knows more
about the recruits, is great with getting into the spirit of college hoop,
and never is dull. Billy Packer is okay x-an-o's wise, but has the
personality of what he is - a former ref. Al McGuire - yuk! He rarely
seemed to know who was on the court... vastly overrated in my book.
And let me say that I've been very impressed with Jim Valvano in the studio.
His blend of self-deprecating humor and knowledge of the game is refreshing.
I had lower expectations based on his stint with the "Wild and Wacky World
of Sports" {or whatever it was called}, but he's really surprised me.
Since MrT was man enough to not blame the refs last night, I will. While
they didn't cost IU the game, they were as bad as usual in the Big 10. There
never seems to be any cohesiveness among the refs. One guy will call
everything, one guy will call nothing, and the other one will only make
bad calls. They've been bad for as long as I've watched the Big 10 - 1979.
|
15.67 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Tue Jan 22 1991 15:58 | 18 |
| Nobody is denying Vitale's prep or knowledge it's his delievery I can't
handle. It's one thing to be excited but he's excited to the point that
he distracts from the game. He screams on routine plays like somebody
just won a championship for petesakes and at first his top 5 or 10 lists
we're ok but now he's got one for everything and I'm really not all that
interested in everything that he thinks. He also has a bad habit of trumping
the players that he is watching. Last night he was pushing JJ for top
small forward in the country ahead of Owens. Next week he'll do a big east
game and Owens will be the greatest thing since sliced bread.....
Valvano is good in the studio, he's good on the air with Brent...
for analyist I'll take Rafferty any day over Dicky. His knowledge is no less
his delievery is better. He doesn't have the recruiting down like Dicky
though...
mike
|
15.68 | I disagree on every point, FWIW. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 22 1991 16:42 | 13 |
| Rafferty is the poor mans Vitale. As to his lists, I find them
entertaining. A welcome diversion from the usual boring color
commentator. The fact that he gets excited is, IMO, a *strength*, not
a weakness. He sincerely enjoys his work, and the enthusiasm is
contagious. Lastly, you imply that Vitale is inconsistent, one week
calling JJ the best small forward, the next crowning Billy Owens the
best. I have NEVER caught Vitale being inconsistent. In fact it's
usually the opposite. He labels somebody his best (in this case
Jackson) and when Owens is playing he'll point out that he still
considers Jackson the best.
- ACC Chris
|
15.69 | as always agreeing to disagree | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Trifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12! | Tue Jan 22 1991 17:23 | 10 |
|
Chris if you didn't disagree with everything I said, we'd have a problem. ;^)
Sure at first he was refreshing and his ethusiasm was good but now he has
become a caricuture of himself and goes overboard with it. Also does his
mouth ever stop? Besides he fawns all over UNC and Deanho, need I another
reason for my dislike?
;^)
mike
|
15.70 | 1-21-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Jan 22 1991 18:58 | 138 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-22-91) NCAA
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 1991 18:39:09 GMT
Saturday's Results:
#43 MICHIGAN STATE 73, #55 Minnesota 64: The Spartans ripped out
to an 18-point halftime margin and coasted home. State led 45-27 at
the break as Steve Smith had 19 in the half and generally had
everyone shaking their heads. Unfortunately, the Spartans had
trouble sustaining this effort in the second half, as the Gophers
had the lead cut to 5, 53-48, with 10:14 still to play. But,
a 3-point play and a trey by Smith kept Minnesota from getting
any closer. Smith has scored at least 20 points in 23 consecutive
games. Arriel McDonald, who has starred lately for the Gophers, led
Minnesota with 25 points. Kevin Lynch was off again, connecting on
just 4 of 16 field goal attempts. Minnesota outscored the Spartans
by 10 from the field. Another sellout of 15,138 at the Breslin
Center...
#57 Michigan 69, #67 WISCONSIN 68 (OT): It must be hell to be a
Wisconsin basketball fan. They saw the Badgers squander a 16-point
second half lead and lose in overtime. The Badgers led 35-21 at the
break in totally dominating the Wolverines in the first half (just
like they did against Iowa last week). Wisconsin hit the first
bucket of the second half to go up 37-21, then the roof caved in at
Wisconsin Fieldhouse. The Wolverines already had the lead cut down
to 5 or less by the time both teams were in the 40's, and it was
close the rest of the way although Michigan never tied it until the
59-all score at the end of regulation. Michigan opened up a 64-61
lead in the OT, but Wisconsin regained the lead on free throws.
Tony Tolbert gave Michigan a 69-68 lead with :05 left on a
15-footer, and an apparent victory as the Wolverines broke up a
last-ditch scoring opportunity. BUT, a foul was called at the horn
on Michael Talley, and Larry Hisle had a chance to win it. But, he
missed BOTH free throws, with no time on the clock, and a wild
Michigan celebration ensued. Hisle had been 7 for 8 from the stripe
in the game before the misses. He looked awful as he left the
court. Talley led Michigan with 18, including several great drives
to the hoop for layins as Michigan's quickness won out. Patrick
Tompkins had 19 to lead Wisconsin. Michigan outscored Wisconsin
from the field by 22 points. 11,400 very disappointed fans in
Madison...
#3 OHIO STATE 89, #62 Illinois 55: It was close for a half, due
to Buckeye turnovers, but Ohio State woke up in the second half and
forced Illinois into a school-record 32 turnovers with it's swarming
full-court, pressing defense. The first half was very sloppy, with
OSU leading just 30-27 at the break and neither team playing well.
The first couple of minutes of the second half were the same, but
then the OSU turnover patrol started. Once the score reached 45-35,
the inevitable occurred. The crowd and Ohio State team went on a
frenzy, and the score progressed to 63-43, then 70-45, and shortly
thereafter the Buckeyes stretched the lead to 30 points and beyond.
Jim Jackson led a balanced attack with 21 points. Andy Kaufmann had
14 for Illinois, even though Lou Henson benched him for 12 minutes
of the first half in an effort to obtain greater teamwork. There
were 53 turnovers in all in this game. As usual, 13,276 rowdy ones
filled St. John Arena...
#5 Indiana 99, #49 IOWA 79: The Hoosiers broke away from a 40-40
halftime deadlock to route the Hawkeyes and their swiss-cheese
defense. Calbert Cheaney scored 30 points and Eric Anderson had 14
to lead the Hoosiers. Iowa coach Tom Davis described his team as
"The reality is we just weren't up to it tonight... Maybe it was
fatigue on our part". Iowa led 43-40 early in the second half on an
Acie Earl three-point play, but then IU went on a 17-5 run to go up
59-50 with 14:55 left. IU incredibly hit 14 of it's first 16 shots
in the second half and ended up 61% from the field. That's pretty
tough to beat. The Hoosiers maintained control of the game
thereafter. Earl led Iowa with 18 points. The Hoosiers only hit 23
of 35 freebies, before 15,500 at Iowa City...
NORTHEASTERN 84, #234 Northwestern 79: The Huskies held off the
Wildcats in this "Meeting of the Norths". The Wildcats were down by
5 at the break, 38-33, so they did make a game of it. Northeastern
won it's 6th straight, while NU has a losing streak going of at
least 6. Todd Leslie led the Cats with 22 points before 2,418 in
Boston...
Monday Result:
#3 Ohio State 93, #5 INDIANA 85: The Buckeyes beat the Hoosier
team, the wild crowd, Mike and Dick, and the zebras. Pretty
good trick, eh? Why is it that every time Indiana shoots within 10
feet of the basket, the refs automatically blow the whistle? Time
and again in the second half last night, this happened even though
the Buckeye defender did nothing but stand his ground, put his arms
straight up and not jump! Yet, those moving screens by Indiana
(Bailey has learned well) went uncalled... Then, the announcing
zoo-crew of Mike Patrick and Dick Vitale seemed to question every
call against Indiana in the second half. Come on guys, I thought
you were supposed to be neutral? The game? Well, OSU put on a
clinical performance in the first half, even though IU went to
the line 17 times before the break. The Buckeyes led 21-12 halfway
through it and had it up to 48-29 at the intermission. The swarming
OSU press had IU in a tizzy, as the Hoosiers had trouble just
passing the ball or dribbling it. Halftime came none too early for
Bob Knight's crew. Several Buckeyes were in foul trouble in the
first half already, and both Jim Jackson and Perry Carter played
only 9 minutes appiece due to it. It was business as usual early in
the second half for the Buckeyes, stretching the lead to 22 points
on several occasions before IU finally got to it. One 9-2 run got
it going, but the Buckeyes seemed to get the lead back to 14 or 15
without much trouble. It was still 75-63 Buckeyes when IU finally
broke the door down, and it got as close as 82-79 in the final
2 minutes. This game was not really decided until the final 25
seconds as the Hoosiers finally missed a couple of shots and a
couple of free throws. Ohio State had the uncanny ability of
hitting the crucial shot each time it was needed. Though I don't
have the final stats, Jamaal Brown had a career game for the
Buckeyes, with 29 points. A great win for the Buckeyes, and a
great comeback for Indiana, as the Hoosiers really dialed up the
defense in the second half. The usual rabid 17,000+ filled the
red, white and blue Assmebly Hall...
Wednesday:
#43 Michigan State at #32 PURDUE 7:00 pm CST
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
3 4 Ohio State 16-0 6-0
43 26 Michigan State 12-4 5-1
5 3 Indiana 16-2 4-1
62 36 Illinois 12-6 2-3
32 40 Purdue 10-5 2-3
55 44 Minnesota 9-6 2-3
67 NR Wisconsin 8-7 2-3
49 24 Iowa 13-5 2-4
57 NR Michigan 9-7 2-4
234 NR Northwestern 5-10 0-5
|
15.71 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | AD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989 | Wed Jan 23 1991 10:36 | 33 |
| I learned long ago that one dares cry about obviously damaging
officiating after a win. I'll say this, though: Used to be Bob
got you +6 points a game with his intimidation act. After a while
it became "de rigeur" among refs - especially Big10 refs, the nation's
worst - to do Bob up. A ref could make a name for himself that way,
Ed Hightower for example. Eventually, Bob recognized this and now
he's one of the quietest coaches in the league. But his legacy isn't
yet shaken and now I rate Bob at a -6 points, with Mene Gene being
the King of the Sideline (he even blows up when he *gets* a call!).
As for the Hoosiers, they've played two blue chip clubs and the games
were similar: nearly blown out, hanging on in the -15 to 20 range,
the blue chip team loses concentration and hustle, and IU reverts to
a quick 3-guard lineup and scrapes back to make the loss look decent
in the papers. That isn't the mark of a #3 club.
WARNING: Watch out for Michigan State, Peplowski iand Steigenga are
rolling now, and their guards have improved some, along with Smith
playing more under control. State has a shot at the Bucks for the
Big10 Crown.
Dropping to the 4-10 slots in the Big10, here's how I rank their
"upset quotient":
1. Illini (Deon be baaaad, Kaufman is a scorer, Kpedi a blocker)
2. Iowa (Earl is 2nd best center behind Carter, great young talent)
3. Purdue (burly, deep front-line but cruddy guards except for Trice)
4. Wisconsin (it's 3-point time baby!!)
5. Minnesota (2 senior starters will come on, youngsters improving)
6. Michigan (great small men, but Riley's a bust)
7. Northwestern (decimated by departures, a year of great let-down)
Big10 Tom
|
15.72 | REVELATION OF FRAUD-HYPE !! | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | just what did N. Fouquet know? | Wed Jan 23 1991 16:56 | 26 |
| PROOF !! INCONTRAVERTABLE PROOF OF ANTI-BOB ANTI-IU HYPE !!
I just watched a tape of the Buckeyes-Hoosiers clash with a close
friend who's a_OSU grad (he insisted). Everytime Damon Bailey
was playing in and around the basket (which was a lot in the 2nd
half, when he checked up at forward) and jumped up to the hoop I
forced him to slo-mo to this alleged 39" leaper and freeze frame
him at his apex. The highest I caught him going was maybe, and
this is a stretch, 18" (I have a_eye for this particular length
cuz it's along the lines of my johnson ;^). On one particular play
his main, Treg Lee, was coming in for a lay-in, Damon went for the
block, leaping, and his hand barely reached the rim. Treg dumped
in the two with impunity.
Damon has great body control and cain drive to the hoop (though
with his poor leaping ability he frequently gets his shots blocked
or changed), but I challenge anybody out there to send me a tape
where he demonstrates any kind of mogambo leaping ability (i.e., with
his haid and elbows up around the hoop, as is common with super leapers,
ex-Hoosier Keith Smart for example).
And speaking of Smart - a *real* leaper - I remember *him* grabbing
'bounds against big guys and even blocking their shots. Ain't seed
that yet with "superstar" Damon.
Big10 Tom
|
15.73 | He's no Air Bailey but he ain't stuck to da floor | SHALOT::HUNT | Gulf War = Iraqi Horror Picture Show | Wed Jan 23 1991 17:30 | 14 |
| Damon had at least one very agressive over-the-top-from-behind block on
a Buckeye down in close to the hoop in the 2nd half.
I don't know if it was 39" in the air but he was "up there" for sure.
Bob Hunt
P.S. And I'm the Queen of England if your Johnson is anywhere near as
"tall" as Bailey's max vertical leap. Besides, it's the thickness
that counts anyway. Ever seen Shack's forearms, yeah, well, that's me,
pal. Pure heft. Whomp. :-) :-)
|
15.74 | | SACT41::ROSS | Beau Knows French! | Thu Jan 24 1991 08:19 | 2 |
| Purdue upset Michigan State {thanks to MrT's KOD} 62-51 and are now 3-3 in
the league, 11-5 overall.
|
15.75 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Jan 24 1991 08:58 | 23 |
|
These vertical spec's are about as accurate as the NFL 40 yard
times we see. Most of those are done under very controlled
circumstances and are hard to duplicate under game conditions.
As for the vertical question, if Bailey were 6'2''(don't know his
exact height) and he had a 39'' vertical, that would put his haid only
7'' under the rim. Seven inches sounds like a lot, but the NBA and the
NCAA have gone to the smaller boards and now the bottom of the rim
bracket is only 6 inches from the rim. So, Bailey would be in effect
hitting his haid on the backboard with a 39 in vertical with a height
of 6'2''. This doesn't even take account for arm length. Assuming
that he has "average" arms, his sleeve length is probably around 35-
36 inches. If he held his arms overhead and coupled with that 39in
vertical, this would put his hands almost 3 feet over the rim!
As you cain see, this is kinda unlikely...I'm from Mo. so show me!
These stats are highly inflated in my book.
bill..g.
|
15.76 | embarassing to ALL us Big10 Brethern... | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | just what did N. Fouquet know? | Thu Jan 24 1991 11:51 | 21 |
| >Purdue upset Michigan State {thanks to MrT's KOD}
Well this about sez it all now don't it?
Poor-mouthing at its ultimate. A Boiler alum publicly decrying a
Purdue win as a_unfortunate product of some kinda kiss of death.
This main engages here in what amounts to a_analytical variant of
the game Naked Twister, controting, deforming, perverting good old
rah-rah sports fervor into a bottom-feeding species of Machiavellian
rhetoric.
As for me, Dougie, I'll pass on this twisted game you play: *I* will
root for *my* alma mater regardless of the consequences in notes. And
I ain't gonna say "I hate to tell you I told you so" cuz I DON'T hate
to tell you I told you so cuz I DID tell you so but noooOOOooo you
couldn't muster the requisite intellectual honesty to accede to the
self-evident Truth that Purdue is loaded with a mogambo front-line and
frosh Linc Darner is bona-fide Big10 RoY meat cuz he shut down the
league's PoY last nite maino-a-maino *HA* !!
Big10 Tom
|
15.77 | Might be | DECWIN::SCHNEIDER | I JUST WANNA SHOUT! | Thu Jan 24 1991 12:40 | 8 |
| >This doesn't even take account for arm length. Assuming
>that he has "average" arms, his sleeve length is probably around 35-
>36 inches. If he held his arms overhead and coupled with that 39in
>vertical, this would put his hands almost 3 feet over the rim!
Only if his arm were attached to the top of his head!
Dan
|
15.78 | Dan, can you touch the net yet? :-) | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Jan 24 1991 13:56 | 9 |
|
re: dan
Wiseguy... O.K. if he were normal, his reach over the rim would be
about 2 feet over the rim which still translates into an extraordinary
leap. I'm still skeptical!
bill..g.
|
15.79 | slow vs. quick | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Just what did N. Fouquet know? | Thu Jan 24 1991 14:58 | 13 |
| bill..g., you're absolutely right about specs measured in tests
versus under real conditions. SuperStiff Matt Nover, Indiana's
starting "center" is a perfect example. He was maybe the best
high jumper in state H.S. history. But when he *does* jump during
games it's usually only a modest leap cuz the leaping technique
that got him over a 7' bar in the field is so excruciatingly slow
as to be unusable in hoops, where the quickness of a leap is more
important than its height. More often than not Nover doesn't jump
at all. The only time I've seen his jumping prowess is when he's
had the uncontested layup, which in his career has happened maybe
twice.
Big10 Tom
|
15.80 | **Attention NCAA Selection Committee! ATTENTION!!!** | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Thu Jan 24 1991 15:26 | 5 |
| Carolina's win @ Purdue is starting to look better-and-better.
Remember, we played 'em *before* they lost their best guard!
- ACC Chris
|
15.81 | and others | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu Jan 24 1991 15:29 | 5 |
| > -< **Attention NCAA Selection Committee! ATTENTION!!!** >-
This is what NC State is saying after beating top 10 Duke.
TTom
|
15.82 | help | BIS1::ROOSEN | | Fri Jan 25 1991 02:22 | 9 |
| Can someone explain to me what's all about the BIG TEN and the PAC TEN.
I follow the games as much as possible on Eurosport and in the
conference, but it seems that in controversy to the NBA the overall
standings are a minor priority regarding to the league.
Example in precedent reply that Carolina has now 3-3 in the league and
11-5 overall???
Can someone show also the standings for all the leagues at this moment?
Patrick
|
15.83 | | ISLNDS::WASKOM | | Fri Jan 25 1991 08:15 | 38 |
| I'll try to help with some of it.
In the US, there are so many colleges that play sports that they
can't all play each other. Colleges and universities that are of
a similar size, place a similar emphasis on sports (and particular
sports within the set of sports available to play) and geographically
close have formed leagues. Schools in the league play each
other a set number of times each year and end the season with a
league champion.
However, most of these schools want to play more
games than there are other teams in their league, so they set up
games with additional schools that they believe will accomplish
a number of goals. One might be getting a win, so their program
will look good to the athletes they are trying to recruit and the
pro scouts looking at their athletes. Another might be that they
think it will be a good "draw" - a team that will bring either TV
viewers or lots of spectators or both. A third might be stronger
competition, so that their players improve by playing a tougher
opponent. There are some schools (Notre Dame is one) who are such
a good draw that they have chosen not to belong to a league, but
schedule all their games "independently" - hence they are called
independents.
The Big Ten is a league of 10 large universities in the mid-West
(Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa).
The Pac Ten is a set of 10 large universities on the western coast
(California, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico and Arizona - maybe a
coupla other states). Because the schools are so big, they have lots
of alumnae who want to watch their games. They also put a lot of
emphasis on sports, and are regarded as the training/proving ground
for our professional leagues. There are other leagues which share
some characteristics with these two - the ACC (Atlantic Coast
Conference) gets a lot of air-time in this file for example.
Hope this helps. I'll let others post standings :-)
A&W
|
15.84 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Patriots: Lousy team, great missile | Fri Jan 25 1991 09:11 | 3 |
|
Been taking John Hendry lessons, A&W?
|
15.85 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:15 | 5 |
| Can someone tell me who Arkansas lost to? I'm wondering how 17-0 OSU
can still be ranked behind them. OSU has beaten several good teams:
@Michigan,@Indiana,Georgetown(neutral),So Miss,Iowa... of course, they
played a Georgetown type schedule for the first 10 games or so.
|
15.86 | Arizona beat Arkansas | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:28 | 3 |
| Arkansas lost early to Arizona, I think in the NIT preseason.
TTom
|
15.87 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: NoTY 1990 | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:39 | 39 |
| Groaner, another problem the Bucks have credibility wise is that
they beat Gougetown sans Alonzo Sneering, their best player. I
think the Buckeyes cain play with anybody right now, and may be
the best team in the nation. They were here last night and phsycially
manhandled the Golden Goofers. They have all the pieces:
Superstar fwd Jim (aka JJ)
Widebody fwd Treg
Nuclear widebody center Perry
Haidy playmaker Baker
3-point/defensive ace Jamaal
Bench quick, big, hustling Jent et al
The Buckeyes are clearly the class of the league. I think the key for
them is that they're based upon 3 widebody musclemen who cain 'bound and
run the floor, which puts them in a position to run with UNLV, Arkansas,
or anybody else with impunity. Arkansas has no Jim. I wonder if Larry
Johnson is up to Jim's snuff. Jim cain block, 'bound, pass, run, drive,
and oh btw knock down the NBA trey. Jamaal emerging as a 3-point artist
slams the final nail in the coffin for the Little 9.
Next year they pick up ThunderBurp, and go preseason #1. (Isn't Perry
the only senior fer cripesakes?!)
re: Bob & Ayers
Turns out there's a big connection here: Bob set up Randy with his first
job as asst. at Army, and played a role in getting him hired on as asst.
at Bob's alma mater, and recommended him for the haid coaching post.
Turns out that Ayers spoke at length with Bob before taking the chance
on ThunderBurp.
Big10 Tom
|
15.88 | Who's champion? | BIS1::ROOSEN | | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:48 | 8 |
| Thanks for the quick response, but still one question.
Whenever they say here in Europe (in my case Belgium) that a certain
university (eg. UCLA) has won the university title, does this mean that
they won the PAC 10 competition or is it (this is what I think) that
they won the play-offs between al the conferences (Big East,Big
10,ACC,...)?
Patrick
|
15.89 | | SACT41::ROSS | Beau Knows French! | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:59 | 6 |
| C'Mon T.. let's not get too carried away. I've seen Larry Johnson, and
JJ is no Larry Johnson.
JJ is the next Joe Dumars.
Larry Johnson will be the next Karl Malone.
|
15.90 | More JHendry-style info | ISLNDS::WASKOM | | Fri Jan 25 1991 13:03 | 21 |
| re .88
I'm not positive without better context. The NCAA(National Collegiate
Athletic Association) has a post-season tournament in basketball.
Takes place in March. Automatic entries in the tournament are
given to the winners of designated leagues, plus a few (somebody
help out here - how many?) slots for teams that are either independents
or did well overall. The winner of that tournament is the NCAA
champ. Last year I believe the winner was University of Nevada
- Las Vegas (UNLV)?? The format of the tournament, invitations
to participate, and seedings and locations of the games are all
subjects of intense debate. One of the consequences is that a team
with an excellent overall record may not even get to play in the
tournament, or a team that did well early but has injuries toward
the end will be defeated early on. Converses are, of course, also
true.
One of the difficulties with football is that there is no post-season
tournament sanctioned by the NCAA to determine the overall "winner"
- hence all the verbage here and other places about the "mythical
number one".
|
15.91 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Fri Jan 25 1991 13:30 | 19 |
|
How'd the Badgers make out last night? They were in the process of dumping
NW before I drop off....I really like this team and look for them to pull
off an upset of one of the Big 3 before it's all over....
they've got to be one of the most unselfish teams I've watched this year..
Arkansas was cruising against Zona holding a 9 point lead and Zona completely
baffled. Ollie Miller took his 4th personal and a Technical. Zona hit all 4
foul shots and then a 2 with the ball and steamrolled that into something
like a 25-6 run to finish the game....
JJ has the potential Doug to be much more than Larry cause he can play more
than one posistion and play them all exceptionally well.......
Larry's a 4 maybe a 3 but I don't think he has the ball handling skills to
be more than an occasional 3....
mike
|
15.92 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: NoTY 1990 | Fri Jan 25 1991 13:54 | 38 |
| Jim cain score with impunity, only he digs passing so much that he
dishes off a lot and therefore only scores 25 ppm. This is where
Jim rises above Steve Smith or Calbert. I think that Larry Johnson
is a bit overrated cuz they play the kind of game where spectacular
moments are maximized. Jim is no showboat, just Mr. Efficiency. He
also plays with great emotion and plays great D.
Wisconsin's Patrick Tompkins scored a career-high 29 pts. last night.
This team looke to be a low rent Willie Simms road show, but players
are emerging, Tompkins among them. Yoder seems to've decided to go
with the trey against the good teams and to rely on his two fine
widebodies in the paint against the lesser teams. Wisconsin-Purdue
is gonna be a mighty interesting game from the development standpoint,
both have tournament potential if they cain show any consistency.
Indiana knocked off the Wolverines last night in Crisler. A_important
win for them, losing there would've pretty much ruined them on the
season. But, again, they were outrebounded by 10 by a team that's
*very* weak inside and went pretty much with 3 guards all the way.
Gregg Graham emerged with a big 19 point night, helping Indiana to a
road win even though Cheaney shot poorly (17), Anderson chipped in 15.
From the box it looks like Bob kept his two stiff middlemen on the
bench where they cain do no harm. Michigan is an ideal matchup foe for
the Hoosiers (small, not one widebody, poor shot selection, etc.), but
a pattern seems to be emerging where Indiana plays well against the
weak teams but brushes with being blown off the floor against the good
ones, especially the big ones (IU had to come back from way down against
lowly - but big - Notre Dame). I look towards the Hoosier-Illini clash
for a reading as to how they're likely to fare in the tournament.
The Hoosiers have State tomorrow in E. Lansing. That could be real
ugly for them. Especially now that State is fighting for its life,
they'll be giving no breaks (except maybe bones underneath).
Big10 Tom
|
15.93 | how 'bout Brown | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Jan 25 1991 14:49 | 6 |
| T, and others: What's the deal with the other Ohio St Forward, Brown. He
had 20 or so the other night against IU. Was that a career game?
Much obliged
TTom
|
15.94 | Career high | DECWIN::SCHNEIDER | I JUST WANNA SHOUT! | Fri Jan 25 1991 15:31 | 7 |
| TTom, I think Brown had 28 or 29 in the OU-IU game. They said his
previous high was 20. He killed the Hoosiers early with the trey.
From what was said, I got the feeling that he isn't usually much of an
offensive player, but they were going with the hot hand.
Dan
|
15.95 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: NoTY 1990 | Fri Jan 25 1991 15:52 | 32 |
| Jamaal's their off-guard. Word has it that once the Bucks got thru
the Gougetown-style cupcake portion of their schedule Ayers noticed
a lot of doubling on JJ. Remember, Lee and Carter aren't jump shooters
by any stretch. Baker is an excellent driver but not a great J-shooter
either. This left Jamaal, who wasn't so much of bad shooter before but
just got the green light for the first time recently. He continued
with the treys and Js last night against Minnesota. Everybody's looking
for Brown to keep shooting from the outside to keep the court open for
them. In the Big10 you must do this or you get killed with zones by
teams like State and Purdue. A shooting guard was the only missing part
but now Ayers thinks he has that too.
Jent, the scrapper swingman off the bench is a fair jump shooter
himself (I've played street hoops with him when he was in high school
in Jersey, he liked to shoot from 20+ there).
Impressive to me is Robinson, the 7 ft. stiff substitute center. IU
should have a stiff this good. He's really picked up some skills that
were absent last year, fouling less, playing some D, and actually
leaving the floor on his "jumps." Obviously, he'd be the best center
in a decade if he were on the Hoosier squad.
Many people at Williams last night commented on 3 things:
1) Bucks' strength, muscle, studliness even down to lil' Baker.
2) Bucks' depth.
3) They have this look of total-control confidence about them, but
also look like they're on a mission. They have the air of a champ
about them, like they cain turn it on whenver needed. Perry Carter
is their emotional leader; JJ is their star.
Big10 Tom
|
15.96 | OSU deserves #1 ranking right now, IMHO. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Jan 25 1991 16:07 | 16 |
| If the NCAA tourney were held today my money might very well get behind
the Buckeyes to win the whole enchilada. They're tough, man. *TOUGH*.
Trouble is though the NCAA crowns its champeen by the team that
exhibits *season-ending* peak form. Anything less just gets ya
a_excellent loss label. In both '84 and '87 Carolina played stellar
hoops during the season, easily as strong as the '82 bunch. Both
of these squads went undefeated in ACC conference play - an incredible
accomplishment. Alas though, neither squad even got to the Final 4.
What's my point? Simply that it seems to be a rare occurence that a
team playing as well as OSU is right now will win a Title, or even make
it to Indy.
- ACC Chris
|
15.97 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Just what did N. Fouquet know? | Fri Jan 25 1991 16:13 | 12 |
| ACCCrisp, must you drag the Buckeyes down into the mire that your
choke-a-holic hero has made for himself? Understand that for this
self-serving analogy of yours to work OSU'd have to be in this
position 8 years out of 10 for three decades and STILL have only
the one Title that they do have.
Nice try, though.
If IU loses at State they could drop out of the top20, which would
be the biggest slide seen since the paper tiger UVA gridders.
Big10 Tom
|
15.98 | T talks subjective trash; ACC Chris hits with cold objectivity. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Jan 25 1991 16:20 | 10 |
| Your outrageously false exagerations aside, I want it known that I'm
serious here.
When was the last time a team playing as well as OSU is right now in
mid/late January gone on to win a Title?
The '82 Heels might be the last one ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.99 | MSU-PU report | FORTSC::MOK | | Sat Jan 26 1991 12:57 | 54 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-24-91) NCAA
Date: 24 Jan 91 18:32:52 GMT
[Here's a little tidbit from Lou Henson yesterday to help everyone get
focused for this coming Monday's Iowa at Illinois extraveganza:
"It'll be a long, long time before that feeling (anti-Iowa) changes.
Our players are close to Deon Thomas, just as they were before he came
to Illinois, and they know what he went through during the past year,
and why he went through it. When a staff does what the Iowa staff did,
using tactics to attempt to destroy a young man and a basketball
program, you can't help but feel that way. We won't soon forget it, and
I can't say everything is fine because it's not. We're not letting what
Iowa did slide by."
An unrelated quote from Tom Davis, when asked about the "vengeful nature
of the Illinois crowd":
"They (Illinois) did a terrific job with that last year. It's a tough
place to play, but you have to prepare for that everywhere you go in the
Big Ten. I approach it like any other game and I'll try to keep my club
focused on the game."
Bruce Pearl plans to attend Monday's game...]
Wednesday's Results:
#29 PURDUE 62, #30 Michigan State 51: Purdue's offensive funk
continued during the first 12 minutes of this game, but then
everything changed and the Boilers won a big ballgame. With just
under 8 minutes remaning in the first half, Michigan State led 20-9.
But, then it was the Spartans turn to cool, as Purdue ran off 15
straight points to go ahead and never trail again. A couple of
baskets were traded to produce a 28-23 Purdue advantage heading into
the locker room. State managed to tie the game at 34 with 15:05 to
play on a Steve Smith trey, but Purdue then gained a 7-point
advantage at 43-36. MSU came back with 5 straight to cut the lead
to 2 with 7:54 left, but Purdue followed with a 5-2 run to go ahead
48-43. The lead was still 5 at 52-47 when Purdue blew out to a
59-47 advantage. An Andy Penick basket at :49 ended another MSU
scoring drought. Twelve of Purdue's final 14 points came at the
stripe as the Spartans attempted to stay close by fouling. Linc
Darner was the offensive and defensive star for Purdue, scoring 16
points and helping to hold Smith to just 20 points (his average is
28.1). Smith was the only Spartan in double figures. Matt
Steigenga only managed 4 points. Mike Peplowski had 9 points and 9
boards. Jimmy Oliver added 15 for Purdue, and Chuckie White had 13
points and 6 carroms. 14,123 at Mackey Arena...
[....]
|
15.100 | Thursday night 1-24-91 games | FORTSC::MOK | | Sat Jan 26 1991 12:58 | 74 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-25-91) NCAA
Date: 25 Jan 91 17:19:42 GMT
For those of you who keep track, Purdue's 26-game winning streak against
Wisconsin will be put to the test tomorrow in Madison. January 1977
marked the last Badger win in this series, a two-pointer at Wisconsin
Fieldhouse...
Thursday's Results:
#6 Indiana 70, #51 MICHIGAN 60: Michigan hung tough until the
final five minutes of this game at Crisler Arena. Greg Graham was
the scoring star for Indiana, hitting for 19 points. Damon Bailey
did not play due to a left thigh bruise. The Hoosiers led 33-28 at
the break and managed a couple of 8-point leads early in the second
half before the Wolverines came back to trail by only 49-48 about
midway through the second half. Michigan had one chance to take the
lead or tie at that point, but Eric Riley missed a short jumper and
the Hoosiers returned the favor with a 3-point play at the other
end. IU eventually rolled out to a 70-56 advantage just before the
end in a finish reminiscent of Michigan's against Ohio State a few
weeks ago. A pretty docile crowd by the sounds of it last night...
#2 Ohio State 80, #60 MINNESOTA 70: The Buckeyes solidified their
position at the top of the standings with a convincing win over the
Gophers at Williams Arena. OSU used a 21-8 first half run to gain a
lead it would never relinquish. The Gophers only got as close as
6 points in the second half. Kevin Lynch had a big ballgame for
Minnesota, but it wasn't enough. Jamaal Brown had 17 points for
OSU, and keyed the big first half run. This is Ohio State's best
start (17-0 currently) since the 1962 season...
#61 Wisconsin 74, #210 NORTHWESTERN 57: The Badgers came up with a
rare Big Ten road victory by whipping the Cats at Welsh-Ryan Arena.
The first half was close, but the Badgers pulled away early in the
second half and coasted home. Burly Patrick Tompkins led Wisconsin
with a career-high 28 points...
Saturday:
#68 Illinois at #51 MICHIGAN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#30 Michigan State at #6 INDIANA 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#29 Purdue at #61 WISCONSIN 4:00 pm
#60 Minnesota at #210 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
Monday:
#62 Iowa at #68 ILLINOIS 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
2 4 Ohio State 17-0 7-0
6 3 Indiana 17-2 5-1
30 22 Michigan State 12-5 5-2
29 NR Purdue 11-5 3-3
61 NR Wisconsin 9-7 3-3
68 NR Illinois 12-6 2-3
60 NR Minnesota 9-7 2-4
62 31 Iowa 13-5 2-4
51 NR Michigan 9-8 2-5
210 NR Northwestern 5-11 0-6
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler [email protected] |
| Illinois State Water Survey or: [email protected] |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
15.101 | | SACT41::ROSS | Who dares to mock me? | Mon Jan 28 1991 08:45 | 7 |
| Indiana continued to enforce MrT's KOD on Michigan State, beating them
badly at Bloomington. Superstar freshman Damon Bailey led the team with 19,
but it is not sure how far off the ground he jumped.
MrT's KOD worked again on Purdue... who traveled to Wisconsin and were beat
66-44. They're still a fine bunch of widebody studs, right MrT? They're
a .500 ballclub. Nothing more.
|
15.102 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Just what did N. Fouquet know? | Mon Jan 28 1991 09:50 | 22 |
| Who you kidding Ross? Losing at Mad City no longer carries the
humiliating stigma it once did. Tompkins & Simms cain mix it up
with anybody, and when their long range shooters are on target
this squad plays like they belong in the top10. Btw, during the
State - IU game Peplowski laid some muscle on somebody and colormain
Greg Kelser remarked, "Peplowski is so strong, there are only three
middlemen in the Big10 who can bang with him: Tompkins of Wisconsin,
Earl of Iowa, and Riley of Purdue." Why he failed to mention the
strongest main in the leauge, Perry Carter, escapes me. But you
get the point. Gene must win this year, he's been blessed with a
fantastic front-line, and if he fritters it away this will reflect
poorly on his coaching record. He's got three guys who'd start
ahaid of poor Matt Nover, so it's put up or shut-up time for Keady.
re: ACCrisp
How 'bout last year's UNLV Rebels, for starters. Michigan comes
to mind before that, and so on. You get the idea too, hopefully.
Remember that OSU woulda lost a game by now probably had they not
played a Gougetown Cupcake preconference.
Big10 Tom
|
15.103 | MSU might get there though ... | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Mon Jan 28 1991 10:12 | 13 |
| Vegas don't count, cause they didn't play the kind of grueling
mid-season schedule that OSU is encountering right now.
Michigan? Come off it. They weren't even one of the top seeds in
their regional when they won their unlikely Title, so's I doubt they
were playing the ultra-high level of hoops that OSU is playing right
now.
No, mark my words: OSU will not reach the Final 4. They're peaking at
this very moment ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.104 | | SACT41::ROSS | Who dares to mock me? | Mon Jan 28 1991 11:08 | 18 |
| Hey, MrT, did you happen to see Larry Johnson against Louisville Saturday?
29 points and 13 boards and he was out of there for much of the end. He
also showed he can handle the ball, at one point taking a pass at the top
of the key, doing a crossover dribble drive to the hoop, leaving his man
in the dust. He's better than Jimmy Jackson... right now.
If I were drafting in the NBA, and everybody was available, I'd take:
1. Shaquille O'Neal
2. Larry Johnson
3. Jimmy Jackson
4. Doug Smith
5. Billy Owens
6. Calbert Cheaney
7. Steve Smith
8. Kenny Anderson
9. Dikembe Motuombo
10. Christian Laettner
|
15.105 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Tue Jan 29 1991 11:13 | 7 |
| What? I didn't see Alonzo Sneering on that list.
Acie Earl looked pretty tasty last night to a poor Hoosier fan not
accustomed to having Division I-A middlemen around. Deon didn't look
too shabby, either.
Big10 Tom
|
15.106 | 3's away.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Tue Jan 29 1991 11:55 | 11 |
|
Deon looked great physically but I don't recall him doing all that much.
Of course I missed the tail end of the game but for all the talk about
how he was going to pay back Iowa I expected a monster of a performance
which I didn't see. Possibly Acie and the other Iowa widebodies had
something to do with this....
the Badgers will beat the Buckeyes...
mike
|
15.107 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Jan 29 1991 12:47 | 5 |
|
The best thing about the Bucks this year is that Taylor is NOT
the coach. Too many times did the team go into the NCAA tourney
with high expectations only to lose very early. I remember
specifically the team with Kellogg that lost to UCLA.
|
15.108 | Who else is on probation? | WORDY::NAZZARO | We don't rent pigs | Tue Jan 29 1991 13:31 | 11 |
| Nice idea - the top ten guys you'd take if everyone were eligible
and the draft was today. I would include Shawn Bradley and Stacey
Augmon in my Top Ten, leaving out Cheaney and Laettner. And Bradley
would be third, behind Shaq and Mutombo. The others, in order,
Larry Johnson, Steve Smith, Doug Smith, Jimmy Jackson, Billy Owens,
Kenny Anderson, and Augmon.
BTW - does anyone know which teams besides Kentucky are ineligible
for post-season play?
NAZZ
|
15.109 | Big Ten results last Saturday | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Jan 29 1991 14:42 | 92 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-28-91) NCAA
Date: 28 Jan 91 23:43:38 GMT
Saturday's Results:
#68 Illinois 72, #51 MICHIGAN 67: Michigan led early 9-0 and 14-4,
but once Illinois caught up later in the first half, the game was in
doubt until the final minute, as Larry Smith pretty much won it by
himself with 22 second-half points (he had 28 overall). The
Wolverines lost the first half lead briefly but regained it to take
a 37-32 advantage to the lockeroom. Illinois got things tied up
pretty quickly in the second half, and the game pretty much
see-sawed the rest of the way. Michigan had one six-point run from
Sam Mitchell which turned a 52-49 deficit into a 55-52 lead. But,
an Illinois timeout seemed to change things, and the Illini took the
lead for good when the score reached the low 60's. Demetrius Calip
had 25 for Michigan, but got most of them in the first half. The
pivital play of the game occurred with 1:25 left and Michigan
trailing 65-64. The Wolverines were trying to set Calip up with a
shot, but Smith intercepted one of those "skip" passes and flew down
for a jam. 11,707 at Crisler, with echoes of "Hail to the Victors"
still rattling in their brains...
#6 INDIANA 97, #30 Michigan State 65: IU had a great first half,
leading 46-30. Then the Hoosiers hit 13 of their first 17 second
half shots. Game OVER! This was a complete, thorough blowout off
the Spartans, as the crowd in Bloomington must have been hoarse
afterwards. Steve Smith was held to just 14 points, a season-low
for him (he had been averaging 27.6 ppg). Damon Bailey, conversely,
scored a career-high 19. The Hoosiers ended up 37 of 57 from the
field, with five players reaching double figures. Bob Knight's son,
Pat, even managed 8 points himself. Matt Steigenga was a lone
bright spot for Jud Heathcote with 16 points. Jud said, "We played
so bad here. Is is time to make changes, try some different things?
We're not getting better and that is a concern. 17,298 in
Bloomington...
#61 WISCONSIN 66, #29 Purdue 44: I'll deviate from the normal
format a bit to give you a running score, so that you can see how
pathetic Purdue's offense can be at times. Don't be fooled by the
final score. It wasn't *that* close, as the February 10, 1977 to
January 26, 1991, 26-game Purdue win streak was blown to hell at the
Wisconsin Fieldhouse:
WIS Pur
--- ---
4 0
6 4
9 6
14 6
14 8
25 8 10:30 left, Badgers 10 for 12, 4-4 treys
28 8 About 5 minutes left
32 10
Half 34 14 Pur: 6 for 21, only White, Riley score
43 14 15+ left
44 20 12:16 left, Wisconsin had cooled
53 20 7:57 left, still only White, Riley
53 25 6:50 left, Darner hits trey
59 33 3:27 left, Yoder goes to deep bench
64 35 2:00 left, Purdue 14 of 44
Final 66 44 Jimmy Oliver SCORELESS!!! Pur 16 of 48
Gene Keady termed the performance "sick" in his postgame interview.
Wisconsin decided the game early, with it's great shooting, but even
the Badgers really didn't do much the final 30 minutes of the game.
If they had, this would have been about 90-44. Purdue had one
8-minute scoreless streak in the first half, to go with the 9-minute
one at Minnesota last week and the 5+ minute one against Michigan
State. All credit goes to the Badgers here, for playing a great
defensive game on Jimmy Oliver. Chuckie White had a good ballgame,
but that was it. Willie Simms led the Badgers with 11 points and
the great defense on Oliver, who had an 18.1 scoring average. The
fivesome Oliver, Travis Trice, Linc Darner, Ian Stanback and Matt
Painter were a combined 4 for 27 from the floor. Dave Barrett
played a good deal of the game and didn't even attempt at shot...
11,482 howling fans at Madison... [This is for Charlie: Both
Machelle Joseph and Joy Holmes are better than some of the men!]
#60 Minnesota 85, #210 NORTHWESTERN 68: The Gophers notched an easy
win in Evanston. Randy Carter scored a career-high 29 points for
Minnesota, and Kevin Lynch chipped in with 18. Pat Baldwin led the
Cats with 17. The Gophers led by only 5 at the break, 37-32, but
got things rolling in the second half. No other details thanks to
my wonderful local paper, other than 6,419 at Welsh-Ryan...
[....]
|
15.110 | Monday night game | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Jan 29 1991 14:48 | 103 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-29-91) NCAA
Date: 29 Jan 91 17:20:30 GMT
Three points:
(1) Besides Ohio State and Indiana, the Big Ten appears to be as
weak top-to-bottom as it has been in a long, long time. If somehow
Illinois would manage to finish fourth (I still have faith in
Michigan State to take third), I would not be surprised if only 3
teams are picked for the NCAA tournament, as the next candidate teams
would be fifth or lower. After witnessing last night's performance,
and comparing it to the earlier Syracuse-UConn game and then later
to UNLV jumping ahead of Utah State 20-2, I'd have to say the Big
Ten has seen better days...
(2) Is anyone else getting tired of missing action on these ESPN
games because Mike and Dick are talking about something else? Last
night, with Illinois up by just a point, we had no idea that
Rennie Clemens missed the front end of a two-shot foul, and had to
wait until the scoreboard in the arena was shown to note that he did
indeed miss the shot! The cameras didn't bother to show the shot
either...
(3) Can you believe that TWO writers changed their first-place
votes in this week's AP poll from UNLV to Ohio State??? I wonder
how they can justify that? I wasn't aware that UNLV had done so
poorly lately...
Monday's Result:
#68 ILLINOIS 53, #62 Iowa 50: Illinois did nothing right the final
6 minutes of the game last night, yet managed to hold on as Iowa
either couldn't hit a free throw or Acie Earl tried a really dumb
offensive move. A 7-footer trying to do dribble moves? Val Barnes
was the guy to get the ball to down the stretch, but his teammates
never really looked for him. He usually had to take it upon himself
if he touched the ball. Larry Smith won the game again for
Illinois. Andy Kaufmann's stint in Lou Henson's doghouse has broken
his spirit, don't you think? He doesn't look anything like the
player I saw single-handedly bring the Illini back from the dead
against Purdue a few weeks ago... The score was tied at only 17-all
with just 3:25 left in the first half. Illinois then asserted
itself, building leads of 28-21, 41-26, and 47-33 with less than 10
minutes to go, when the Iowa offense finally woke up and made a game
of it. Actually, with the Illini repeatedly turning the ball over,
taking their own dumb shots and missing a boatload of FTs, Iowa
really could have won this game had they done anything in the final
2 minutes. The Hawkeyes ended up shooting as badly as Purdue did at
Wisconsin Saturday, but almost won anyway. Guess which great
shooting teams are playing each other this Thursday??? The biggest
attendance of the year made it to the Assembly Hall for this blood
match. The crowd only got ugly once, throwing debris on the floor
after an Andy Kaufmann travel (replay vindicated the refs). Dr. Tom
was looking for hands to shake after the game, but he didn't appear
to find many. Illinois now hosts Wisconsin and Northwestern in an
unusual schedule which will see them play 6 of their first 9
conference games at home. The second half could be rough...
Wednesday:
#61 Wisconsin at # 6 INDIANA 7:00 pm CST
Thursday:
#62 Iowa at #29 PURDUE 7:00 pm
#51 Michigan at #60 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
#2 Ohio State at #30 MICHIGAN STATE 7:00 pm ESPN (!)
Saturday:
#61 Wisconsin at #68 ILLINOIS Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#210 Northwestern at #62 IOWA 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
Sunday (FINALLY!!):
#29 Purdue at #2 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC (National)
#6 Indiana at #60 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
Next Monday:
#210 Northwestern at #68 ILLINOIS 8:30 pm ESPN (ugh!)
RECORDS:
(Old) (New)
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
2 3 Ohio State 17-0 7-0
6 4 Indiana 18-2 6-1
30 34 Michigan State 12-6 5-3
68 NR Illinois 14-6 4-3
61 NR Wisconsin 10-7 4-3
29 NR Purdue 11-6 3-4
60 NR Minnesota 10-7 3-4
62 40 Iowa 13-6 2-5
51 NR Michigan 9-9 2-6
210 NR Northwestern 5-12 0-7
|
15.111 | Md, Ill, Mo also on probation | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Tue Jan 29 1991 16:41 | 8 |
| Nazz,
Maryland (last year, this year), Illinois (this year, next year) and
Missouri (this year, next year) are also ineligible.
There may be more.
TTom
|
15.112 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Wed Jan 30 1991 08:38 | 6 |
|
Mine would be, Shack, Mutumbo, Anderson, Owens, JJ, Larry, Doug Smith,
Stith, Mourning and Murdock...
mike
|
15.113 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Mike Heiser, R.I.P. | Wed Jan 30 1991 11:29 | 11 |
| 1. Shack (is Allah)
2. Jim Jackson
3. Larry Johnson
4. Billy Owens
5. Alonzo Sneering
6. Steve Smith
7. Brian Stith
8. Kenny Anderson
9. Doug Smith
10. Dikembe Mutumbo
|
15.114 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Just what did N. Fouquet know? | Wed Jan 30 1991 12:21 | 8 |
| Hate to say it but I have to agree with Lou Henson on the unscrupulous
behavior of Dr. Tom Davis & Company. Much ado about nothing, after all
the wild accusations about "$80,000 + Chevy Blazer" turns out it was more
like "$20 + bus money to mom's funeral." Reason I hate to say it is that
Deon woulda been MUCH happier had he gone on down to Bloomington where
he belongs.
Big10 Tom
|
15.115 | Heard this tune before | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Wed Jan 30 1991 15:08 | 6 |
| Re. -1
Yeah,
Sounds familiar( see Holtz ). And Holtz got pilloried for the same
basic thing.
|
15.116 | He's going to make them forget Steve Alford | SACT41::ROSS | Caught up in 'As DEC Turns' | Thu Jan 31 1991 09:11 | 6 |
| Indiana whipped Wisconsin last night at Bloomington... Non-leaper Damon
Bailey led the team in scoring for the second straight game with 21. Damon
will end the season with more points than all of the Tar Heel Superfrosh
combined.
Mrt, please sign in and discount Damon's play as mediocre.
|
15.117 | they'll get even at home | CHIEFF::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Thu Jan 31 1991 10:53 | 7 |
|
Any more details than that Doug. I mean I would have thought that those
the Badgers would have made a game of it. Especially considering that
Tompkins and Simms are of the widebody variety that Bob can only have
wet dreams about???
mike
|
15.118 | | SACT41::ROSS | Caught up in 'As DEC Turns' | Thu Jan 31 1991 11:36 | 23 |
| From AP:
Damon Bailey scored 21 points at Bloomington, In and Calbert Cheaney
added 14 as No. 4 Indiana defeated Wisconsin for the 22nd consecutive
time.
Indiana (19-2, 7-1) led by as many as 14 points in the first half,
helped by a tenacious defense that held the Badgers scoreless for
separate stretches of 3 and 4 minutes.
The Badgers (10-8, 4-4) pulled to 34-24 at the half, then came on
strong at the beginning of the second half.
{that's it... seems like we missed the good stuff due to space
considerations... I can't complain, though. The Columbia, SC
newspaper has more scores and more writeups about college hoop
than any paper I've seen. Plus they get the late scores too.}
---
Ohio State versus Michigan State tonight on ESPN. A Spartan
loss will make the Big 10 a two team race. The conference season
will be at its halfway point on Saturday. Any team with 3 or
more losses is done.
|
15.119 | More details on UW-IU game last night | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:12 | 63 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-31-91) NCAA
Date: 31 Jan 91 15:50:41 GMT
Wednesday's Result:
#4 INDIANA 73, #48 Wisconsin 57: The Badgers managed to do what
some recent teams visiting Bloomington could not do: not get blown
out. IU had a couple of early 14 point leads and it looked bad for
Wisconsin, but the Badgers fought back and only trailed by 10 at
halftime (34-24) after having been down by just 8 points. Early in
the second half, they even had the lead down to 7 at 38-31. At
40-32, IU scored 12 straight points to take a 50-32 lead, and managed
to stay ahead by at least 15 the rest of the way. The largest lead
was at 60-39. Damon Bailey scored a career-high 21 points (he's
made his last 7 three-point attempts), despite finding out earlier in
the day that his sister has cancer. Calbert Cheaney had 14 points
on perfect shooting. Pat Thompkins and Willie Simms starred for
Wisconsin, but gunner Tim Locum was scoreless. IU was 19 of 20 from
the stripe in a great shooting display. Both teams were below 50%
from the field, however. The Assembly Hall sellout was a bit
quieter than usual as Wisconsin's defense held the Hoosiers in check
more than usual...
Tonight:
#2 Ohio State at #41 MICHIGAN STATE 6:00 pm ESPN
#59 Iowa at #35 PURDUE 7:00 pm
#69 Michigan at #54 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#48 Wisconsin at #60 ILLINOIS Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#228 Northwestern at #59 IOWA 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
Sunday:
#35 Purdue at #2 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC
#4 Indiana at #54 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
Monday:
#228 Northwestern at #60 ILLINOIS 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
2 3 Ohio State 17-0 7-0
4 4 Indiana 19-2 7-1
41 34 Michigan State 12-6 5-3
60 NR Illinois 14-6 4-3
48 NR Wisconsin 10-8 4-4
35 NR Purdue 11-6 3-4
54 NR Minnesota 10-7 3-4
59 40 Iowa 13-6 2-5
69 NR Michigan 9-9 2-6
228 NR Northwestern 5-12 0-7
|
15.120 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:14 | 4 |
|
Thanks Doug. Gametime 7:30, 8:00 for tonight?
mike
|
15.121 | to answer myself 7:00 thanks Charles for the report and time | CHIEFF::CHILDS | When love rears up it's ugly haid | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:21 | 0 |
15.122 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jan 31 1991 14:15 | 21 |
| >Mrt, please sign in and discount Damon's play as mediocre.
Now dagblamit Doug that's just plain UNFAIR. Ain't said that Damon
is mediocre. All I said was coming outta H.S. this kid had a build
up comparable to that of Lou Alcindor and what we end up seeing is a
kid with limitations too-often described by commentators in "but she
has a nice personality" terms. When the hype was going down I had
visions dancing in my haid of a power player capable of playing the
front-line with sneering impunity (slam-jams, blocked shots, mogambo
nuclear rebounds, etc.), and when I first saw him in big-time
competition I logged the same disappointment as YOU.
Btw, this is the Midwest, so it goes without saying that the game
wasn't broadcast here - we got Big East and Almost Close action just
like the other 6 nights of the week... Also, it was the Hoosiers'
22nd straight victory at HOME against the Badgers.
Big game tonight from the standpoint of Hoosier fans. And I'll be in
row 16 in the barn Sunday afternoon with my print-outs at the ready.
Big10 Tom
|
15.123 | prediction... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Jan 31 1991 14:47 | 4 |
|
OSU by 4 over MSU in a close one. Jackson and Lee get in foul
trouble early.
|
15.124 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jan 31 1991 15:15 | 16 |
| >Holtz got pilloried for the same basic thing.
Watch it with the past tense there! Holtz goes before the Infraction
Committee this Friday. In this morning's Mpls paper they had a_expert
saying that Holtz did the same thing that Galen Hall did and that there
was pressure to have the same punishment assessed on Lou: 5 yr ban from
NCAA coaching. The same article quoted Texas Christian's coach saying
that Lou's mistake was being honest, which may have put him on a
different level as a person but will see him on a higher level of
punishment for having done so.
As a Notre Dame grid fan I'm hoping Lou doesn't get it, but part of the
guy's charm is how he relates to people, and in this case it may see
him outta college grid.
Big10 Tom
|
15.125 | | SACT41::ROSS | Caught up in 'As DEC Turns' | Fri Feb 01 1991 07:42 | 7 |
| A big night of upsets in the Big 10 on Thursday.
First Michigan State beat Ohio State 75-61 at MSU.
Then Iowa beat Purdue {that talented team} 78-69 on Purdue's home court.
And Michigan beat Minnesota 66-62.
Indiana and Ohio State are now tied for the Big 10 lead.
|
15.126 | Is there anything Smith can't do? | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I'm a victim of SADORISIS | Fri Feb 01 1991 09:29 | 9 |
|
Saw alot of the MSU game and they flat out wanted it more than OSU. They
played up to the potential of their pre-season ranking. Hard to believe
they lost by 30 to the smaller Hooisers. They did a good job of keeping JJ
in check. Be an interesting rematch when they go to Buckeye land. I kind
of missed the play that lead up to Ayers taking the technical. Seemed key
as OSU had just taken a slight lead....
mike
|
15.127 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 01 1991 12:21 | 4 |
|
OSU did not play well at all. They could not seem to get things going
in the second half. They also seemed to be in a panic early... like
down 8 with 8 minutes to go, and they were in a panic.
|
15.128 | GO BADGERS!! | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I'm a victim of SADORISIS | Fri Feb 01 1991 13:25 | 11 |
|
Could be that they weren't ready for the physicaliness of MSU. Which leads
one to suspect that although Perry is carved up suprememely he isn't mentally
into the banging.
One thing for sure it proves the guys who gave them those #1 votes have Rocks
in their heads.
Arkansas vs. UNLV coming soon!!!!!!!!!!!!
mike
|
15.129 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 01 1991 14:58 | 6 |
|
Mike, one loss does not mean the team is not one of the top teams in
the land. Remember, Arkansas has 1 loss, and UNLV hasn't exactly
played a tough schedule... When UNLV loses to the Razorbacks, #1 will
be up for grabs.
|
15.130 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I'm a victim of SADORISIS | Fri Feb 01 1991 15:53 | 9 |
|
Paul, I wasn't implying that they weren't one of the top teams just that
they certainly aren't #1. I like OSU, I was touting em last year especially
JJ. Arkansas has the personal and the game plan to beat UNLV but Ollie
Miller has to stay out of foul trouble. If he doesn't play the Razorbacks
will not be able to physically match UNLV in the box.
mike
|
15.131 | Dirty anti-Bob myth-lie debunked by fact !! | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 04 1991 10:28 | 34 |
|
The only reprehensible act of any substance by Bob was his allegedly having
taken his team off the floor against the Russians. Turns out, he didn't.
Also turns out that, as usual, the press took liberties with the facks in the
incident, so much so that what started as just plain fake reporting became
self-perpetuating myth:
The entire litany was revived at the opening of the 1987-88 season
in the widely-reported "Russian incident." Unanimously, reporters
wrote that in protest against the officiating Knight took his team
off the floor. Yet this is not what happened at all. After Knight
had protested against leaving, referee Jim Burr had raced over to
the scorer's table and written that the game was forfeited before
anyone realized what was happening. Only then did Knight and his
team leave.
Weeks later, reporters, with the exception of Dick Vitale on ABC
television, still had Knight removing his team from the floor as if
it had been a matter of his choice, his decision. As in the case
of Puerto Rico, the original error was perpetuated in the press:
Knight petulantly had led his team off the court. "Grow up," wrote
Harvey Araton in the New York Daily News, adding, "punch a cop in
San Juan, if you must, throw a few chairs, but do get us into the
Final Four." Even Andy Rooney of Sixty Minutes had his say via the
Tribune Media Services: "Knight decided, on the spot, to take his
team off the floor and forfeit the game."
There is a profound difference between a team leaving the floor
after a forfeit and taking your team off thefloor and by so doing
forfeiting the game... Acknowledging (that the rules hadn't been
adhered to in the Russian game) the Amateur Basketball Association
apologized "for inconsistencies in the official's enforcement of
the the Russian's coach's box, substitution and free throw lane
rules," an apology which never made the newspapers.
|
15.132 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 04 1991 10:56 | 71 |
| >One thing for sure it proves the guys who gave them those #1 votes
>have Rocks in their heads.
I don't think that's for sure at all. Remember, while the Bucks are
going into Breslin and Assembly Hall etc. the Runnin' Rabble are off
munching on cupcakes like San Jose State. The Rabble are a_excellent
team (btw, what do you think Augmon and Larry got for staying this
year, $250,000 each?), but playing in a pud league tends to magnify
them in comparison to the other excellent teams, who put it on the line
week in week out [yes, I remember the game in Detroit].
The call on which Ayers took the T was indeed unbelievable. But he
gave the other team a 7 point trip down the court, and it killed them.
I think the key thing hurting the Bucks was that Jamaal Brown and JJ
shot poorly, but give the D credit on this.
Steigenga is hard to understand. I dunno if he's slow-witted, but I've
rarely seen so much talent so poorly used. And you cain't fault Jud,
Steigenga simply insists on making stupid passes, stupid fouls (he fouled
out on 5 stupid, unnecessary fouls, 4 of which came after he'd already
put the shooter in a position where he was throwing up a prayer, only to
be sent to the line for free-throws), and stupid shot selection. He's
constantly out of position on offense, on defense, and in transition.
The guy seemingly hasn't learned a thing in 3 years. But he'll still be
an NBA draft pick, and a good one.
Btw, a buddy of mine went out for post-game drinks with Ayers and his
entourage, and when axed about Funderburke Ayers said that he had a
"very very rough upbringing" and was indeed a haid case and that he had
no idea whether he'd stick at OSU, but he's a great player and probably
learned his lesson in Bloomington, and represents a huge bluebird for
the OSU program cuz all top Ohio players (both hoops and grid) by long-
standing tradition go to Michigan for some reason.
I was at the Indiana-Gopher game, which the Hoosiers won by 12 or so.
This is no #4 team, going down to the young, not-so-good, Gophers by
13 several times in the first half. They were unable to make a move
until they reverted to the 3-guard lineup with Anderson in the middle.
After that they inlet passed constantly to Anderson who'd go up, get
fouled, and go to the stripe. He won't be able to do that against a
good team (and wasn't against OSU and SyrExcuse).
Gregg Graham also suffered a reversion, going back to his old ways
making at least 10 errors on offense, 3 of which cost sure baskets in
the first half that resulted in Indiana falling far behind. Little
Chris Reynolds did an unbelievable job of D on Kevin Lynch, shutting
him down. Lynch, showing his typical lack of class, cried during the
post-game about being double-teamed all the time cuz he's on a team
short of scorers. Odd thing is, except for the usual weak-side help
outs, Lynch was never doubled by Indiana.
The Hoosiers fell behind in the first half largely cuz they played
NO inside game at all when Nover was in. Nover's abject inability to
receive inlet passes was partially responsible for this, but more than
that was that Indiana contented themselves to take open midrange Js
that they consistently missed. IU finally grabbed the lead with 11
minutes left in the game, kept it around 5 points going into the last
few minutes, and then stretched it out at the foul line at the end.
The 3-guard offense gives the Hoosiers much better D, and until they
went to it they were unable to get the motion offense going cuz Nover
was getting eaten alive by Ernest Nsigamasabo, Minnesota's 4.0
engineering student Watusi who just learned how to play hoops 3 years
ago as a_exchange student. I got skeert when Clem countered the
3-guard lineup with 3 straight successful mismatch lay-ins against
much smaller Hoosier defenders. But gradually Indiana motioned the
poor Goofers to death until their defense fell apart and they ended
up in big-time fould trouble, whereupon the Hoosiers surgically took
control over the contest.
Big10 Tom
|
15.133 | dam Illini beat the Badgers too...anyone got a weekend roundup? | CNTROL::CHILDS | I'm a victim of SADORISIS | Mon Feb 04 1991 11:10 | 11 |
|
Well maybe "rocks" was too a strong a statement but I do feel that not
only is UNLV better so is Arkansas. The Buckeyes sure looked impressive
yesterday in the last five minutes against Gene's boy. Larry certainly
could have taken a few lesson from JJ yesterday don't you think Doug?
I remember the play now that Ayers got the T. The big boy Robinson stepped
in perfectly to a charge on a 2-1 break that MSU was dealing up and got
called for blocking....
mike
|
15.134 | Fortunately, the tourney renders this a *disadvantage*! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 04 1991 11:46 | 8 |
| Course you'd think Vegas & the Hogs are better. They don't play
anybody and rack up huge numbers as a direct result!
If you put Arkansas in the ACC, Big East, or Big 10, I'll guarantee
they'd end up with at least 5 losses. (Maybe more ...)
- ACC Chris
|
15.135 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 04 1991 11:50 | 4 |
| UNLV'd wouldn't go undefeated in the ACC or Big East, although
they might in the down Big10 this year, but I doubt even that.
Big10 Tom
|
15.136 | Wait til ACC tourney, I'll probably OD on Kenny A | SACT41::ROSS | Open for suggestions | Mon Feb 04 1991 13:17 | 13 |
| >Larry certainly could have taken a few lesson from JJ yesterday don't you
>think Doug?
Unfortunately, Mike, I now live in the SOUTH. Where the only hoops allowed
on TV must involve the ACC. That's right, Purdue Vs Ohio State was not shown
locally in Columbia, SC. We got the distinct pleasure of seeing Ga Tech vs
NC State. That would be fine most days, but since we had seen GA Tech vs
Duke on Wednesday, and Wake Forest vs Clemson, and UNC vs Clemson and god knows
how many other ACC games last week, it's getting a little old. It's
unbelievable how many games they show.... and how much network stuff they'll
preempt to do it.
Tell me, what did JJ do? :-( And how bad were the Purdue guards?
|
15.137 | Debunking yet more dirty anti-Bob lies... | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 04 1991 13:24 | 31 |
|
From falsehood to distortion, the media vultures are ever-anxious to
feast on poor Bob's carcass, seeking in this case to promote an
otherwise unremarkable documentary by sensationalizing a_innocent
reference, a_intellectual literary reference, indeed a highbrowed
quote to his pantheon-mate Voltaire, into a_alleged enorsement of
the act of rape:
On April 25, Connie Chung's documentary, "Stressed To Kill,"
aire on NBC Barely a moment into Bob Knight's segment, almost
his first words are "If rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it."
It's as if the subject of the program were sexuality in the 80s,
with a basketball coach a peculiarly unlikely commentator.
Completely gone is the context in which the coach made the remark:
Knight himself immobilized by unjust officiating, rendered as
helpless as a rape victim, attempting to perceive what it might
feel like to be completely and hopelessly vulnerable.
Recognizing that the figure of speech, no matter its origins in
Voltaire's Candide, might be understood, Knight goes on immediately
to qualify: That's just an old term that you're going to use. The
plane's down, so you have no control over it. God, I'm not talking
about the act of rape, don't misinterpret me there. But what I'm
talking about is something's happened to you so you have to handle
it. You have to be able to realize that there's nothing you can do
about it."
The wire services alter the text, adding an emphatic "now!" after
"so you have to handle it," whereas the "now" came later, after
"nothing you can do about it, now..." as the transition to Knight's
next thought."
|
15.138 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 04 1991 13:28 | 12 |
| Oh quit you're poor-mouthing, Doug. You've gotten so bad with it you
now embarrass even ME with this threadbare technique of yours! Tellya
what, I'll trade you Matt Nover, Chris Lawson, and throw in Pat Graham
if you'll just let me have this Riley stud. Whatta main, and he really
knows how to play. Package a_NBA-bound pivotmain like him with this
Oliver, who makes Anderson and Cheany look like non-athletes, and what
we have is a subpar coaching job being runed in by Mene Gene.
Btw, up here in the midwest it's the same, we get a slate of nonstop
ACC games, with maybe 1 or 2 Big10 clashes thrown in if we're lucky.
Big10 Tom
|
15.139 | Having to forfeit is probably just as bad ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 04 1991 13:36 | 9 |
| re: .131
So tell us then, exactly *why* was the game ruled a forfeit?
I'd also be curious as to your source for all this sudden insight.
Seems strange that it took you so long to find out "the truth".
- ACC Chris
|
15.140 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | in my Muntumo, Muntumo Mamba | Mon Feb 04 1991 14:12 | 15 |
|
Chris just because their respective conference aren't top notch doesn't
mean that the Hogs and the Rebs aren't. Both have the offensive and more
importantly defensive talent to be atop any one of the major conference.
While they certainly wouldn't be undefeated I say 5 losses is a possibilty
but it would probably be less...
Well Doug unfortunely I only saw the last five minutes when I tuned in it was
53-51 OSU. Purdue tied it then OSU turned up the defense and forced a few
bad passes as well as scoring on all their chances. JJ hit 4 or 5 shots down
the stretch all from different places on the court a few assists, rebounds etc.
They certainly looked top notch crunch time but some of the pass by the purdue
guards were dumb...
mike
|
15.141 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Home E. Cheese | Mon Feb 04 1991 16:09 | 4 |
| Hey T, those last two BobKnight fables got me laughing so hard
I gots to hold my side. HAHAHAHAHAHA�
/Don
|
15.142 | Did Bob whisper a new commandment in his disciples' earS? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 04 1991 17:09 | 9 |
|
> Hey T, those last two BobKnight fables got me laughing so hard
> I gots to hold my side. HAHAHAHAHAHA�
Guess T's feeling guilty or neglected, or both. I haven't hardly even
heard any mention of Bob since the Thanksgiving fun. What gives?
glenn
|
15.143 | the TRUE story... | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Feb 05 1991 11:46 | 26 |
| >So tell us then, exactly *why* was the game ruled a forfeit?
It was ruled a forfeit cuz Bob, ironically enough, REFUSED to leave
the floor after receiving his 2nd technical. The rules had been
set aside on several occasions (the Russians had 6 guys on the floor
with the ball in play twice, for example, with no technicals called;
the Russian coach was out of the coach's box most of the game, again
no Ts, etc.), and Bob went crazy when *his* 3rd technical was called
for being out of the coach's box - after he'd been complaining the
entire game about the Russian coach!
Anyway, Bob refused to leave, instead staying with Bill Wall, then
Prez of the AAU (?), trying to work a compromise where the rules were
either enforced or not enforced equably. After only about 15 seconds
of ignoring the referee and speaking with Wall the ref ran over to the
bench and declared the game forfeited and over. Only then did Bob and
his team leave the floor (in fack AFTER the Russians had left).
Not coincidentally, the officiating crew was the same one filed against
by Dale Brown the previous tourney over the phone-slamming incident; a
scene that purportedly cost the crew a Final Four appearance.
Funny how things get twisted into exact opposite LIES where sensationalism
cain be generated.
Big10 Tom
|
15.144 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Feb 05 1991 11:54 | 10 |
| >I haven't hardly even heard any mention of Bob since the Thanksgiving
>fun. What gives?
Wail, after the ACCrook/Dan axis suffered abject defeat on the Bob vs.
Snuffy Smif' issue (in no small part due to your fine work) it's much
less necessary to anlayze things Bob. I've always been one a Bob's
biggest (truthful) critics in here, so I don't want to publicly beat my
own devil, so to speak.
Big10 Tom
|
15.145 | Big Ten last Thur | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Feb 06 1991 03:49 | 77 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-1-91) NCAA
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 1991 19:16:50 GMT
Michigan State reduced the ranks of the unbeaten by one, while
Iowa ended it's 15-game Big Ten road losing streak at reeling Purdue,
and the Wolverines pulled a surprise at The Barn...
Thursday's Results:
#41 MICHIGAN STATE 75, #2 Ohio State 61: I knew they could do it.
Remember last year, when a 5-3 Michigan State team visited an 8-0
Purdue team and came away with an 11-point victory which propelled
them to a 15-3 league title? Will that happen again? It will be
tougher, since there is a second team up at the top this year
(Indiana). But, this was a tremendous performance by a team with
it's back to the wall, coming off it's worst loss in years. MSU was
5-3 going into the game, Ohio State 7-0 and undefeated overall.
What may have been the key to the game occurred during the final
minute of the first half when MSU, down 36-32, got a hoop and then a
technical foul call on OSU coach Randy Ayers. The Spartans tied the
game up after the T and then someone named Kris Weshinskey nailed a
trey to give State a 39-36 halftime advantage. The Spartans then
built upon that lead in the second half. Ayers said, "My technical
was the biggest play of the game". Part of the Breslin Center
sellout of 15,000+ ran out on the floor after the momentus win...
#59 Iowa 78, #35 PURDUE 69: Purdue's slide into oblivion continued,
as the Hawkeyes hammered them in the final ten minutes of the game
before the quietest Mackey Arena sellout I've heard in some time.
In recent games, Purdue has gotten behind early 16-4 (IU), 20-9
(MSU), and 28-8 (at Wisconsin). Earlier, Cal had them down 19-8 and
Stetson had that 43-21 halftime lead. Last night, Iowa led 18-7. I
wonder what Keady tells the team before the games? But, as usual,
Purdue came all the way back to lead, this time with a 15-1 run.
The Boilers led 29-23 with about 6 minutes left in the first half
when Iowa took over again, outscoring Purdue 19-12 to take a slim
42-41 lead to the lockerroom. Iowa, which shot a miserable 33% at
Illinois Monday, blistered the nets at a 62% rate in this half. The
first 10 minutes of the second half were a low-scoring see-saw. A
Linc Darner trey put Purdue up 52-50, and then the game changed for
good. Twice, Purdue forced Iowa turnovers only to blow fast break
attempts (the crowd was really going at this point) and blow a
chance to take a decent lead. Iowa then seized on this chance and
transformed this two-point deficit into a 62-53 lead which
essentially decided the game. Unfortunately for Purdue, Chuckie
White had severely sprained his ankle during the final seconds of
the first half and didn't play any of the second half until he
pleaded his case with the coach and entered the game at this point.
He did his best, helping to cut the lead to just 72-68 within the
final two minutes. But, two Val Barnes hoops extended the lead to
76-68 to finally ice it. Acie Earl enjoyed a huge size advantage
inside and had a big game. Purdue has now lost 7 of it's last 11
games (10 of these since the Woody Austin news came out)... It
doesn't get any better, what with a national TV date at Ohio State
coming up... The Hawkeyes ended up shooting 55% for the game, and
were 21 of 30 from the stripe after being only 3 of 12 at
Illinois... Keady termed his team as "not very good" in his
postgame interview, citing "we're back where we were 11 years ago
when I came here" (actually, that team was much better!)...
#69 Michigan 66, #54 MINNESOTA 62: In somewhat of a surprise (at
least to me), the Wolverines pretty much had their way at
Minneapolis last night. Minnesota's season seems to be paralleling
Purdue's at this stage - losing, and no offense. The Wolverines led
by six at the break and built a 12-point second half lead before
blowing it, when the Gophers took a 62-59 lead with just 2:29 left.
That's when Demetrius Calip took over. He hit a trey with 1:36 left
to tie the game at 62. Then, after a Kevin Lynch baseline miss with
just over a minute to go, Calip nailed the game-winning trey with 24
seconds to go. Both Lynch and Nate Tubbs missed subsequent
three-point attempts, and Michael Talley finished off the scoring
with a free throw. Michigan has won 9 of the last 11 and 13 of the
last 16 meetings between these two schools. After not playing all
that much last year (except when Sean Higgins was hurt), Calip has
become one of the stars of the conference this season...
|
15.146 | Sat and Sun | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Feb 06 1991 03:50 | 122 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-4-91) NCAA
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 1991 21:08:46 GMT
Saturday's Results:
#60 ILLINOIS 70, #48 Wisconsin 62: The Illini hung on again as
their opponent again was ice cold from the stripe. Wisconsin could
only manage 8 of 18 from the charity line, and added to Iowa's last
Monday, makes it 11 of 30 against Illinois. Must be that two-headed
cow they have behind the basket... This game may have been decided
during the final 2:30 of the first half, when Illinois turned a
23-20 deficit into a 27-24 halftime lead and never trailed again,
though it did get close. The Illini were down by as much as 21-15
in the first half before taking the lead at the end of the half. In
the second half, they built leads of 47-38 with 11:52 to go and
58-48 a few minutes later. But, the Badgers came back, and with the
help of an Andy Kaufmann T, trimmed 5 points off of the lead
quickly at 58-53. The Illini answered with three points off of a
steal to lead 61-53 with just 5:42 to go. But, Wisconsin outscored
Illinois 9-4 over the next 4+ minutes to whittle the lead to 65-62.
They had some chances, most notably a missed Larry Hisle trey, but
Illinois hit 5 free throws inside the final minute to win. Both
Kaufmann and Larry Smith had 16 points for Illinois. Pat Tompkins
was a bear for the Badgers, scoring a game-high 17 points and
pulling down 8 boards. The largest attendance of the year, 16,295,
was on hand...
#59 IOWA 82, #228 Northwestern 66: This score is not indicative of
the game, as the Hawkeyes stormed out to a 43-18 halftime advantage
after leading 32-10. This was Northwestern's 41st consecutive Big
Ten road loss, the last win coming at Minnesota, of all places, on
February 20, 1986 (65-60). Iowa's biggest lead was 57-29 with 14:28
to play, and the Hawkeyes just coasted home thereafter. Acie Earl
led the Hawkeyes with 19 points and 6 blocked shots. Rodell Davis
had 11 points. The Wildcats were led by Pat Baldwin with 16. Since
coming to Northwestern, Bill Foster is 8-72 in league play and 0-40
on the road! 15,500, as usual, at Iowa City...
Sunday's Results:
#2 OHIO STATE 66, #35 Purdue 59: Amazingly, Purdue was able to throw
a big-time scare at the Buckeyes and their fans before Jim Jackson
settled things down the stretch. There were times in the first half
of this game that Purdue didn't even belong on the same floor as the
Buckeyes. OSU did pull away from a slim 8-7 lead to go up 23-14,
but that's as large as the lead ever got until the final score.
From 23-14, Purdue outscored the Buckeyes 14-9 to cut the lead to
32-28 inside of the final minute of the first half. But, aided by a
couple of turnovers, the Buckeyes were able to go up 36-28 at the
break. Purdue came out fast in the second half, outscoring the
Buckeyes 13-4 to open the half and take a 41-40 lead. The two teams
then played evenly until the 8:00 mark, when Purdue still led at
51-48. It was at this point that Mr. Jackson took the game over, as
he consistently penetrated for easy J's. The Buckeyes took the lead
over inside the 4 minute mark, and held on as Purdue could only must
8 points down the stretch. During the final 6 minutes, OSU
outscored Purdue 15-6. Jackson had 8 points in the final 4 minutes,
and finished with 22. Jimmy Oliver also had 22 for Purdue as he
broke his slump. Chuckie White also had a big game for Purdue, as a
couple of his jams really got his team going. Linc Darner hit a
couple of big treys. Purdue became the first team to outrebound OSU
this year, 26-23. 13,276 nervous fans in Columbus...
#4 Indiana 77, #54 MINNESOTA 66: The Hoosiers overcame 30% shooting
and a 13-point deficit in the first half to come back and whip the
Gophers. A 17-1 run by the Hoosiers, keyed by Calbert Cheaney and
Eric Anderson, turned the tables on Minnesota and the Hoosiers
gradually salted the game away. The win avenged a huge loss the
Hoosiers suffered at The Barn last year on Super Bowl Sunday. Both
Cheaney and Anderson had 22 points, and Kevin Lynch's 20 put him
15th on the all-time Gopher scoring list. No more details on this
one, as they chose not to show it locally, but a near-capacity crowd
on hand in Minneapolis to see the Gopher slide continue...
Tonight:
#228 Northwestern at #60 ILLINOIS 8:30 pm CST ESPN
Wednesday:
#60 Illinois at #35 PURDUE 7:00 pm
Thursday:
#4 Indiana at #228 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#59 Iowa at #41 MICHIGAN STATE 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#41 Michigan State at #48 WISCONSIN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#228 Northwestern at #2 OHIO STATE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#59 Iowa at #69 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#35 Purdue at #4 INDIANA 1:00 pm ABC (National)
#60 Illinois at #54 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Monday:
#69 Michigan at #2 OHIO STATE 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
2 3 Ohio State 18-1 8-1
4 4 Indiana 20-2 8-1
41 34 Michigan State 13-6 6-3
60 NR Illinois 15-6 5-3
59 40 Iowa 15-6 4-5
48 NR Wisconsin 10-9 4-5
35 NR Purdue 11-8 3-6
54 NR Minnesota 10-9 3-6
69 NR Michigan 10-9 3-6
228 NR Northwestern 5-13 0-8
|
15.147 | Ohio State clinches Big10 Title | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Wed Feb 06 1991 12:55 | 10 |
| Well, the Bucks have pretty much wrapped up the Big10 Crown, given
that the undersized Hoosiers must visit both St. John and Breslin
whereas the boys in Red & Silver have already been to Breslin and
Bloomington.
Congrat's to the Buckeyes on winning the only meaningful conference
Crown in the nation.
Sadly,
Big10 Tom
|
15.148 | Are you sure? | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Wed Feb 06 1991 13:25 | 16 |
|
Gee Tom, Thanks!
I really haven't seen too much of them this year except for Sundays
game and to be honest with you, I hope they have looked better. I
don't think I would say things are wrapped up yet though....I think
they still have to play Indiana one more time this year. Its hard for
me to understand why Indiana can still be ranked above Ohio State in
the National rankings with the Big "O" beating them once this year
allready.
I'll be looking for Ohio State to be in the final 4 this year and
be top seeded. Unlike last year where they had to play UNLV in the
early rounds.......when is the reagular season over for them?
Hal
|
15.149 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Feb 06 1991 14:29 | 4 |
|
Hal, look at the national rankings... you'll find that OSU is ranked
higher than IU and have been since the victory...
|
15.150 | Monday result | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Feb 06 1991 18:02 | 63 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-6-91) NCAA
Date: 6 Feb 91 18:18:02 GMT
[....]
Monday's Result:
#60 ILLINOIS 73, #224 Northwestern 59: This was a fairly easy,
though not embarassingly easy win for Illinois, as Northwestern does
play hard (it must be tough to get up for each impending loss). The
Illini led 38-24 at halftime after the Cats had sort of made a game
of it early, though they were down 30-13 at one point after a 20-3
Illinois streak. Illinois then extended the lead to 60-39 before
the walk-ons entered the game. Northwestern, either leading the
country in free throw shooting or in the top couple, again was 20 of
26 for 77%, the one bright spot on the team. The Illini dominated
the boards 39-26. Deon Thomas led the way with 22 points, while
6'11" Kevin Rankin had 19 for Bill Foster & Co. 12,068 on hand...
Tonight:
#62 Illinois at #40 PURDUE 7:00 pm CST
Thursday:
#4 Indiana at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#45 Iowa at #25 MICHIGAN STATE 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#25 Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#45 Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#40 Purdue at #4 INDIANA 1:00 pm ABC (National)
#62 Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Monday:
#60 Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
3 3 Ohio State 18-1 8-1
4 4 Indiana 20-2 8-1
62 35 Illinois 16-6 6-3
25 25 Michigan State 13-6 6-3
45 48 Iowa 15-6 4-5
50 NR Wisconsin 10-9 4-5
40 NR Purdue 11-8 3-6
68 NR Minnesota 10-9 3-6
60 46 Michigan 10-9 3-6 Give me a break, AP!
224 NR Northwestern 5-14 0-9
|
15.151 | | ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSY | TearyEyedYellowRibbonSobNation | Thu Feb 07 1991 13:36 | 22 |
| Wail, looks like my preseason prediction that Illinois would be at
the top of the bottom of the heap is coming true. The Illini's big
road win in Mackey serves notice that they cain challenge State and
maybe even Indiana for 2nd place this year - especially if Kaufmann
gets untracked, what with Deon and all.
The thing to remember about Indiana is that they haven't made a
really tough road trip yet, with these visits remaining:
St. John
Breslin
Assembly Hall - Illinois
Crisler
Mad City
This list leaves the Hoosiers the most likely to drop off during the
second half of the schedule. The question is, willy they collapse and
end up behind State or maybe even Illinois or Wisconsin. They showed
some class against Iowa and Minnesota on the road, but the 5 toughest
road games all remain.
Big10 Tom
|
15.152 | Illinois beats Purdue | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu Feb 07 1991 15:59 | 74 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-7-91) NCAA
Date: 7 Feb 91 16:54:43 GMT
Wednesday's Trainwreck:
#62 Illinois 59, #40 PURDUE 56: I'll spare you the details of this
game, mostly because I can't bear to think about them again and also
because the game was an instant replay of every other Purdue
loss this year (except Wisconsin): Purdue trails the first ten
minutes of the game as the offense is non-existent, then puts on a
spurt to close out the first half with a modest lead (36-28, was
36-26 with 3 minutes left in the half), then comes out flat as a
pancake in the second half, scoring 20 measley points, missing all
but one free throw, but not relinquishing the lead until the horrid
final 3+ minutes when neither team could hit a free throw. Illinois
did it's best to play the gracious visitor, committing two
ridiculous turnovers in the final 30 seconds, with the score 59-56,
but then gladly taking the victory after Purdue missed every three
point attempt it took, including 5 in the final 12 seconds. Jimmy
Oliver was the only Boilermaker who looked of Big Ten caliber.
Chuckie White had one of his worst games in a Purdue uniform,
fouling out with 6 points and a couple of boards. Deon Thomas had a
nice second half for Illinois, as did Larry Smith. This game was
a typical foul-marred Big Ten tilt. 14,123 disgruntled fans at
Mackey Arena saw history - the first Purdue team to ever lose 5
games in one season in Mackey's 23-year history. The loss was also
it's fourth straight and sixth out of it's last 7, the worst such
period since a 7 out of 8 streak two years ago. Keady had his
tersest post-game show ever. Illinois has now won 5 straight,
somehow... I'll disagree with the recent post-er who thought this
was a "great game". It was terribly played on both sides,
foul-marred, and like having your teeth pulled as you watched.
A quick flip to the UNC-NC State game revealed a different caliber
of basketball, frankly...
Tonight:
#4 Indiana at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#45 Iowa at #25 MICHIGAN STATE 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#25 Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#45 Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#40 Purdue at #4 INDIANA 1:00 pm ABC (National)
#62 Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Monday:
#60 Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
3 3 Ohio State 18-1 8-1
4 4 Indiana 20-2 8-1
62 35 Illinois 17-6 7-3
25 25 Michigan State 13-6 6-3
45 48 Iowa 15-6 4-5
50 NR Wisconsin 10-9 4-5
68 NR Minnesota 10-9 3-6
60 46 Michigan 10-9 3-6
40 NR Purdue 11-9 3-7
224 NR Northwestern 5-14 0-9
|
15.153 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Feb 07 1991 16:15 | 10 |
|
� #4 Indiana at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
# 224 !!!???
Is that a little Charles' humor, or does some service actually rank
every team in the nation?
How high does it go?
Mike JN
|
15.154 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Industrial Strength Noter | Thu Feb 07 1991 16:20 | 5 |
| I think some pinhead at the National rates every one of 'em
Mike JN. Imagine deciding who should be #200 and who should be
#201? GET A LIFE!
/Don
|
15.155 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | TearyEyedYellowRibbonSobNation | Fri Feb 08 1991 09:41 | 11 |
| With State being dropped at home by the inconsistent but dangerous
Hawkeyes the Illini are well positioned to take 3rd, even conceivably
2nd, place in the Big10. Should that happen then we're looking at a
probable max of three teams in the tournament - although I'd like to
see Wisconsin sneak in along with State, IU, and the Bucks.
What IS it with Peplowski? His knee's not bothering him anymore, but
he flip-flops from being the best middlemain in the league to a non-
entity (last nite: 2 points).
Big10 Tom
|
15.156 | | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Feb 08 1991 14:14 | 7 |
| Mike, I crosspost the "reports" from usenet and they were written by a
guy Peppler in Illinois. The # ranking is I think the Sagarin power
ratings. Sagarin I think lists all division I programs, every single
one of them.
Charles
|
15.157 | Thursday results | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Feb 08 1991 14:15 | 68 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-8-91) NCAA
Date: 8 Feb 91 16:15:53 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#4 Indiana 105, #224 NORTHWESTERN 74: Northwestern definitely
gave IU a run for it in the first half, but the Hoosiers steamrolled
the Cats in the second half. NU actually led on several occasions,
with the largest lead at 25-19 midway through the half. The
Hoosiers tied the score up at 27, but the Cats took a couple of more
small leads before the Hoosiers tied it for the last time at 33. IU
then outscored the Cats 10-2 to end the first half and lead 43-35.
The Hoosiers then opened the second half with an 18-11 run to lead
61-46, and then coasted home. The second half was 62-39 IU!
Calbert Cheaney led the Hoosiers with 21, while Eric Anderson
chipped in 16 points. Five Hoosiers reached double figures. Four
Wildcats reached double digits. The Hoosiers had a very good
shooting and rebounding second half. A sellout of 8,117 at
Welsh-Ryan...
#45 Iowa 71, #25 MICHIGAN STATE 67: Unfortunately, I have very
little detail on this one, but Iowa handed the Spartans just their
second loss ever on the Breslin Center court. After losing
15-straight Big Ten road tilts, the Hawkeyes have now won two
straight at two of the tougher places to win at. Iowa led 29-28 at
the break, and led by Acie Earl's strong scoring and inside play,
were able to win this one at the end. A very disappointed sellout
crowd in East Lansing. Jim Szabo, the Iowa radio announcer, was
practically beserk during the post-game show. He and James Moses
had a great chat. The Hawkeyes have never won at both MSU and
Michigan in the same year, but now get the chance to do that
Saturday at Ann Arbor. I'll try to add a bit about this very
interesting game in Monday's report...
Saturday:
#25 Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#45 Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#40 Purdue at #4 INDIANA 1:00 pm ABC (National)
#62 Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA 3:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Monday:
#60 Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
4 4 Indiana 21-2 9-1
3 3 Ohio State 18-1 8-1
62 35 Illinois 17-6 7-3
25 25 Michigan State 13-7 6-4
45 48 Iowa 16-6 5-5
50 NR Wisconsin 10-9 4-5
68 NR Minnesota 10-9 3-6
60 46 Michigan 10-9 3-6
40 NR Purdue 11-9 3-7
224 NR Northwestern 5-15 0-10
|
15.158 | Jay Edwards | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 11 1991 11:58 | 54 |
| From: [email protected] (JIM SLATER, UPI Sports Writer)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Ex-Hoosier Edwards has no regrets
Date: 10 Feb 91 20:13:30 GMT
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (UPI) -- Jay Edwards returned to Assembly Hall on
Sunday, having made peace with his troubled past while looking toward
his NBA future.
Edwards departed the Hoosiers for the NBA in 1989 after his sophomore
season, ending a college career marred by academic suspension and drug
rehabilitation. Had Edwards stayed in school, he would have been a
senior on the fourth-ranked Indiana team he saw play arch-rival Purdue
Sunday.
The forward who earned Big Ten Freshman of the Year honors and was
named a UPI All-America as a sophomore admitted having second thoughts
about leaving the Hoosiers early.
``I think about it a lot,'' Edwards said. ``The decision was made and
I have to stick with it. I have thoughts both ways. I can't regret it. I
have to live with it.''
Edwards was selected by the Los Angeles Clippers in the NBA draft,
but saw little playing time before failing a rookie drug test. He was
reinstated last month but is on the injured list after spending the past
10 months rehabilitating injured knee ligaments. Edwards is expected to
rejoin the active roster when the Clippers play San Antonio Feb. 22.
``I just need the chance to get in and show what I can do,'' Edwards
said. ``I'll get that chance. I just had to do a lot of growing up. I
learned a lot in the past two years. I did all the growing up watching
other people play while I had personal problems and injuries.''
Edwards spoke with Indiana Coach Bob Knight during a three-day campus
visit that lifted his spirits.
``I sat down a couple of days ago,'' Edwards said. ``We had a nice
talk. I told him where I was at. It feels good to come back and be
accepted.''
Edwards blames himself for drug use, citing his reaction to the star
treatment he received since leading Marion High to three straight
Indiana state prep titles.
``It wasn't peer pressure,'' Edwards said. ``Anything I did is
because I wanted to do it. I had a lot of opportunities as a player. I
took advantage of them. Everything came so easy to me all the way
through high school.''
Edwards misses having Indiana senior Lyndon Jones as a teammate.
Jones was benched much of the past two seasons, but has returned to lead
a young Indiana squad. Until Edwards departed, he and Jones were
teammates since grade school.
``I talk to Lyndon on the phone at least once a week -- good times and
bad,'' Edwards said. ``I try to help him out with that and he's helped
me. We've been friends since I was 5. He's survived a lot, being on the
bench. (My departure) has affected us both. He knows how I play and I
can take the pressure off him. He has players now who can do that.''
Knight dropped Edwards from the Indiana team after his freshman year
for poor grades. Edwards worked his way back onto the squad over the
summer despite undergoing drug rehabilitation. Edwards quit school after
his second season after alleged threats and an incident involving
charges he slapped a female student.
|
15.159 | on their way to the NCAA's | AGNT99::CHILDS | Tango & Cash, George Bush | Mon Feb 11 1991 13:50 | 10 |
|
Any details on the Badgers beating of MSU would be greatly appreciated.
Also for those of you in the New England area who get pissed off at ABC
for not carrying the Big ten clashes oposite NBC and CBS's games, channel
27 WHLL out Worcester carries them. This sunday's the rematch of IU/OSU
should decide the conference...
mike
|
15.160 | | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 11 1991 18:18 | 12 |
| Re: Boston's ABC station not showing ABC Sunday college games: I have
complained about it for a long time. Now that I am in the SF Bay Area
both the SF and San Jose ABC affiliates do show those games, in favor
of Boston favorite "Star Search" featuring favorite son Ed McMahon.
Sure when there is a Pac-10 game in an ABC regional broadcast they will
show that instead of the Big Ten game, but like yesterday at least the
Purdue-IU game was shown though the Illinois-Minnesota game was not.
Still beats my trying to catch the Worcester broadcast in Boston, which
is usually "have sound, no picture."
Charles
|
15.161 | Big Ten last weekend | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 11 1991 18:18 | 147 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-11-91) NCAA
Date: 11 Feb 91 19:07:40 GMT
Saturday's Results:
#50 WISCONSIN 84, #25 Michigan State 78 (2OT): It took two
overtimes, but Wisconsin finally managed to win one of these home
cliffhangers which they so often blow. The key play of the second
OT and game was an airball by Jay Peters, which Pat Tompkins grabbed
and layed back (and was fouled). His three points gave the Badgers
a 78-74 lead which it would not give up. At times, the extra
sessions looked like Steve Smith highlight films, but he just
couldn't do it all. Wisconsin committed a couple of boneheaded
turnovers at the end of regulation which allowed State to tie it and
nearly win it. Larry Hisle missed two more FTs near the end of
regulation which could have won it, but atoned with some clutch
shooting during the overtimes. The score was only 58-all at the end
of regulation and 64-all at the end of the first OT. Tompkins led
the Badgers with 22 points, while John Ellenson had 14 and Hisle and
Tim Locum each had 13. Smith had 28 for State and Matt Steigenga 20
in one of his better showings. Wisconsin nailed 8 treys and
outscored the Spartans by 11 from the line. 11,501 in Madison...
#3 OHIO STATE 96, #224 Northwestern 64: The Cats hung tough for a
half, but the Buckeyes blew them out in the second half.
Nevertheless, it amounted to NU's 43rd straight Big Ten road loss.
The Buckeyes just had six days off since beating Purdue, and it
showed early, as they looked a bit rusty. The halftime lead was
only 44-32, but was widened quickly in a 52-32 second half. The
Buckeyes had 26 assists and pounded the Cats on the boards 38-19.
Jim Jackson scored 26 points and Perry Carter 16. Todd Leslie had
19 for Northwestern, before 13,276...
#60 MICHIGAN 84, #45 Iowa 70: Iowa didn't get it's much-coveted
Michigan sweep, as the Wolverines whipped them in Ann Arbor. The
Wolverines continue to impress, as they've now beaten the Hawkeyes
ten straight times in Crisler Arena. The Wolverines had their way
most of the game, leading 41-29 at the break and by as much as 66-49
in the second frame. Michael Talley led the way with 21 points,
while Chris Street and Jay Webb each had 15 for Dr. Tom Davis.
Michigan managed to do a good job keeping Iowa off of the boards,
which others haven't done very well lately. The teams combined to
make only 5 of 20 three point shots. 12,644 at Crisler...
Sunday's Results:
#4 INDIANA 81, #40 Purdue 63: Like Wisconsin recently, Purdue
managed not to get routed at the Assembly Hall, but the outcome
never really seemed in doubt, either. The game looked to be a
yawner at the beginning, with the Hoosiers racing out to a 10-0 lead
before Gene Keady had seen enough. Purdue cut the margin to 10-5,
but over the next 10 minutes the Hoosiers built a 28-13 lead. The
Boilers then managed to cut the lead to five at 28-23 on 5 of 7
shooting. IU then scored the next 7 to lead 35-23, and led 41-27 at
the break. Purdue had a pretty good opening 7 minutes of the second
half, cutting the lead to 6 at one point (46-40), and still only
trailed by 7 a couple of minutes later at 50-43. But, the Hoosiers
then regained a 10-12 point lead and kept that until the very end,
when registering their largest lead with the final margin. Jamaal
Meeks had 10 points during the game's critical second half stretch
when IU widened the slim six-point lead. Purdue made 12 turnovers
in the first half, many of them very early. Travis Trice, who a few
games ago looked pretty good, can't even dribble a basketball at the
moment. Jimmy Oliver got a little more help this time, as Chuckie
White matched him with 17 points. IU's Calbert Cheaney had 18 to
lead all point-getters. Damon Bailey had 13 after going scoreless
the first time these two friendly foes met, and Pat Graham had 10.
IU only outscored Purdue by two from the floor, but cashed in at the
line, making 32 of 39. Purdue outrebounded the Hoosiers 37 to 33
and hit 7 treys, but still only shot 38% for the game. Keady got
the obligatory Assembly Hall technical. Cheaney became only the
fifth IU soph to eclipse the 1,000 point mark. The loss was
Purdue's 5th straight and 7th out of 8. But, as Jim Valvano said,
"they are probably playing the best they can, given what they've
got." 17,283 fans saw IU get the measure of Purdue this sports
season, with the coveted "trifecta"...
#62 Illinois 94, #68 MINNESOTA 74: The Illini finally won AND
played well while doing it. In fact, they were sensational,
dominating the Gophers beginning with the final five minutes of the
first half. The Illini hit over 50% from the field for the first
time since mid-December against Mizzou, and hit an incredible 33
of 37 free throws, as the Gophers continued to hack the opposition.
The Gophers did play well early, and led by six with just 5:28 left
in the first half. That's when Illinois, led by Rennie Clemons,
went on a 17-1 tear which saw them blister the nets on fast breaks
while the Gophers were throwing up clunkers from short-range on the
other end. The Illini led 47-35 at the break, but the Gophers
closed to 49-45 early in the second half. That comeback ended
quickly as the Illini scored 13 consecutive markers to lead 62-45,
and the closest Minnesota could get thereafter was 8 points. I
think the final margin was the largest lead. Illinois ruled the
boards 46-36. Andy Kaufmann scored 28 points, Larry Smith 25 and
Deon Thomas 19. Clemons only had 9, but most of those got the team
going with the lead. Kevin Lynch had 28 for Minnesota. The Gophers
were only 3 of 16 from beyond the arc. Just a couple of short weeks
ago the Gophers let one get away in Champaign, but these two teams
have headed in opposite directions since. 16,305 at Williams Arena
saw the Gophers lose yet another home game and the Illini win their
6th straight...
Tonight:
#60 Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE 8:30 pm CST ESPN
Thursday:
#25 Michigan State at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#3 Ohio State at #50 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
#68 Minnesota at #45 IOWA 8:30 pm ESPN
Saturday:
#62 Illinois at #25 MICHIGAN STATE Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#68 Minnesota at #40 PURDUE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#60 Michigan at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#50 Wisconsin at #45 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#4 Indiana at #3 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Next Monday:
#40 Purdue at #60 MICHIGAN 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
4 4 Indiana 22-2 10-1
3 3 Ohio State 19-1 9-1
62 35 Illinois 18-6 8-3
25 25 Michigan State 13-8 6-5
50 NR Wisconsin 11-9 5-5
45 48 Iowa 16-7 5-6
60 46 Michigan 11-9 4-6
68 NR Minnesota 10-10 3-7
40 NR Purdue 11-10 3-8
224 NR Northwestern 5-16 0-11
|
15.162 | | REFINE::ASHE | Whatever happened to Haystacks Calhoun? | Tue Feb 12 1991 18:08 | 4 |
| I thought some channel like 27 picks it up... some UHF station. It's
in the 30's on my cable box.
_Walt
|
15.163 | Monday's game | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Feb 12 1991 20:37 | 67 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-12-91) NCAA
Date: 12 Feb 91 21:13:59 GMT
Monday's Results:
#3 OHIO STATE 81, #60 Michigan 65: A really good ballgame to watch,
as Michigan had just enough athletic talent (except Eric Riley, who
may be a bigger stiff thatn you-know-who) to make this game
interesting. The Wolverines caught the Buckeyes cold early, jumping
out to a 7-2 lead. But, Ohio State ripped ahead after the first TV
timeout 16-9, and had a nine-point lead until the Wolverines drilled
a J to end the first half, with the score 36-29 Buckeyes. At times
Ohio State threatened to blow the Wolverines out in the second half,
but either Demetrius Calip or Michael Talley would drill a couple of
threes to keep it interesting. Ohio State's front line of Treg Lee
and Perry Carter totally dominated the Michigan interior people, and
the press forced Michigan into countless turnovers. Chris Jent
showed everyone why he is "Mr. Hustle". Jim Jackson also had a
field day driving into the paint. Ohio State did not get much from
it's guards, though, and Dick Vitale thought they were thinking
ahead to Indiana on Sunday. They better not be, as they have a date
in Madison on Thursday, which could be very interesting. It's too
bad ESPN isn't showing that. Talley had a great scoring game but
also committed a bunch of turnovers. Lee and Carter had a couple of
prolific dunks which moved Dick to scream his famous "MONSTER MASH"
line. 13,276 fans in St. John's getting ready for Sunday...
Thursday:
#25 Michigan State at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#3 Ohio State at #50 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
#68 Minnesota at #45 IOWA 8:30 pm ESPN
Saturday:
#62 Illinois at #25 MICHIGAN STATE Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#68 Minnesota at #40 PURDUE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#60 Michigan at #224 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#50 Wisconsin at #45 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#4 Indiana at #3 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Next Monday:
#40 Purdue at #60 MICHIGAN 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
New
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
3 2 Ohio State 20-1 10-1
4 4 Indiana 22-2 10-1
62 26 Illinois 18-6 8-3
25 42 Michigan State 13-8 6-5
50 NR Wisconsin 11-9 5-5
45 44 Iowa 16-7 5-6
60 NR Michigan 11-10 4-7
68 NR Minnesota 10-10 3-7
40 NR Purdue 11-10 3-8
224 NR Northwestern 5-16 0-11
|
15.164 | ACC > B10, according to MidWesterner Montross. :^) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 11:49 | 18 |
| [Excerpt from recent Eric Montross interview by Carolina Blue]
Carolina Blue: "Eric, has playing in the ACC been all that you
expected it to be?"
Montross: "I think it's been more than I expected. I knew
what the Big 10 was like, and I had been to the
(N.C.) State game here before I committed, but I
hadn't experienced it firsthand. I had always
heard that the Big 10 was the craziest and the
loudest and all of that, but I think they should
all wake up and realize that the ACC is even more
so. I think you can't really compare the
experience of going to Virginia and playing at
Duke to some other games."
- ACC Chris
|
15.165 | Were Dean's lips moving when he said it? | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Naw Saw's the guy that beats up Evan | Fri Feb 15 1991 12:59 | 10 |
|
Who cares what he thinks about crowd noise? What does he think about the
play? Does he think it's less physical than the Big Ten, Big East (as I do}?
The ACC to me seems to be a quards/small forward league whilst the Big Ten
and Big East are the domain of the Wide Bodies/Physical players.
Also again it's from Caroline Blew(tm) so it should be taken with a grain
of salt...
|
15.166 | What do you think he's gonna say to 'Carolina Blue'? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 15 1991 13:04 | 6 |
|
Apparently the experience was just soooo great that Montross left his
game back in the Midwest...
glenn
|
15.167 | Uh, over here, Eric ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Fri Feb 15 1991 13:05 | 6 |
| � I think you can't really compare the experience of going to Virginia
� and playing at Duke to some other games.
Looks like Eric took geography lessons from T.
Sir Robert of Hunt
|
15.168 | Eric putting together a solid year - will only improve. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 13:07 | 9 |
| Montross' game is just fine, thank you, and it's gonna get a whole lot
better as time goes on.
I dunnot know if Eric thinks the ACC is better than the Big Least or
Bigot 1X but, based on his choice of school, I could make some purty
good guesses!
- ACC Chris
|
15.169 | | MAXWEL::CHILDS | Naw Saw's the guy that beats up Evan | Fri Feb 15 1991 13:55 | 9 |
|
and my guess would be that he's wuss and went where there were no physical
players to beat him up. With Christian Lattiner as the premire big man in
the conference you do lack a physical presence in the post. Lattiner's got
a great game but physicaliness isn't one of it's attributes...
of course you think Eric's game is fine, you thing Dean's a great coach...
nuff said
|
15.170 | Thursday results | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Feb 15 1991 14:54 | 82 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-15-91) NCAA
Date: 15 Feb 91 16:26:52 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#32 Michigan State 55, #223 NORTHWESTERN 53: This was
Northwestern's best attempt at Big Ten victory, as the Wildcats led
until 1:25 was left in the game, and the Spartans limped out of
Evanston fortunate to win. The Wildcats had leads of 19-12 and
23-15 in the first half before settling on a 28-21 advantage at the
break. The lead was expanded to as many as 10 points in the second
half before the Spartans mounted their comeback, and took their
first lead at the 1:25 mark, 51-49. The Wildcats missed a very long
three attempt at the final horn after each team traded four points,
and Bill Foster took out his frustration on a chair. Parish Hickman
was the only Spartan in double figures with 15 points, as Steve
Smith was held to a season-low 8 points. Kevin Rankin led a
balanced NU attack with 19 points. 6,002 at Welsh-Ryan...
#4 Ohio State 73, #49 WISCONSIN 71: Wisconsin overcame a 12-point
halftime deficit and some larger early second half ones to almost
knock-off the Buckeyes. During one stretch in the first half the
Buckeyes ran off 20-straight points, and led 41-29 at the break.
They still led 51-37 several minutes into the second half when the
Badgers ripped off a 24-9 streak and took a 61-60 lead with 5:37 to
go. Ohio State regained a 64-61 lead with 3:06 left, and the game
was closely contested the rest of the way. The Badgers trailed
71-68 when Louis Ely hit a short shot and ensuing free throw with
:35 left to tie the score at 71. Then, the Buckeyes held the ball
until the :11 mark, called a timeout, and finally Mark Baker hit a
twisting J in the paint to win it as the clock expired. Jim Jackson
led Ohio State with 21 points, while sharpshooter Tim Locum had 23
for the Badgers. A great comeback for Wisconsin, and a huge win for
Ohio State ahead of Sunday's date with Indiana. 10,525 at The
Fieldhouse...
#47 IOWA 82, #79 Minnesota 69: The Hawkeyes pretty much had their
way with the Gophers after about the first 10-15 minutes of the
game. Iowa got off to a very slow start, scoring only 5 points in
the first 8 minutes of the game, but then got it going and took an
8-point halftime lead. Leads in the second half dwindled to as
little as 5 early, but then were as large as 15. Minnesota was
hitting it's threes late, so they managed to stay withing striking
distance. However, the Gopher inside game was practically
non-existent again, and Iowa was able to wear them down. No other
details on this game, except the Iowa crowd seemed awfully quiet,
and Wayne Larivee, the ESPN announcer, referred to Bruce Pearl
as a "fine coach" (that's for you Illinois fans!). Probably the
usual 15,500 at Carver-Hawkeye...
Saturday:
#38 Illinois at #32 MICHIGAN STATE Noon CST Big Ten/Raycom
#79 Minnesota at #48 PURDUE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#52 Michigan at #223 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
#49 Wisconsin at #47 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#2 Indiana at #4 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC (Regional)
Monday:
#48 Purdue at #52 MICHIGAN 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
Sagarin AP School Overall Big Ten
------- -- ------ ------- -------
4 2 Ohio State 21-1 11-1
2 4 Indiana 22-2 10-1
38 26T Illinois 18-6 8-3
32 42 Michigan State 14-8 7-5
47 44 Iowa 17-7 6-6
49 NR Wisconsin 11-10 5-6
52 NR Michigan 11-10 4-7
48 NR Purdue 11-10 3-8
79 NR Minnesota 10-11 3-8
223 NR Northwestern 5-17 0-12
|
15.171 | Montross doesn't strike me as the wuss type Mike ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 14:57 | 15 |
| If Eric has a physical weakness it's quickness. If he were a "wuss"
the last place he'd wanna show up is the ACC, where quick big men are
plentiful. (Laettner, Davis, Mackey, Rogers, Gugliotta, etc.) Eric
can bang with *anybody*. Just ask Shack, who confessed recently his
toughest defensive opponent to date was Montross over the summer in
those north/south games.
No, Eric's no dummy (SAT scores upward of 1300). He took a look at
Dean's 10/17 success ratio in turning big men into high-salaried
professional hoopsters (should be 11/18 - Chilcutt looks like NBA
material to me) and realized his earnings potential was best served by
signing up with Coach Smith.
- ACC Chris
|
15.172 | Another frozen rope smacked down the line | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:03 | 13 |
| � He took a look at Dean's 10/17 success ratio in turning big men into
� high-salaried professional hoopsters ... and realized his earnings
� potential was best served by signing up with Coach Smith.
What, no mention of Eric getting his precious college degree ??? Then,
in your words, he's a "hired gun", right ???
Hey, if it looks like a hired gun, acts like a hired gun, and sounds like
a hired gun, it's probably a hired gun.
Nuf said.
Sir Robert of Hunt
|
15.173 | Hanging changup smacked outa the park. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:37 | 7 |
| Big diff Ketch. Namely, Eric also intends to get a degree out of the
process.
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
15.174 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:47 | 11 |
| Chris,
How *do* you know Eric intends to get a degree?? How do you know the
dove didn't?? Face it Chris, the *only* reason this is an issue is
because it happened in the Big East, and not the ACC. And it happened
with, *gasp*, foreigners.
If Eric, or any other *American* really intends to get an education
first, then they should get their degree *beforee* going into the pros.
JD
|
15.175 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:57 | 25 |
| In my not-so-humble opinion, most of the young men who play major
college football and basketball are hired guns, are brainwashed into
thinking they're going to make the pros, see no reason to study and
will try to skate by as much as they possibly can. If you look at the
percentage of those who finish 4 years of eligibility the graduation
percentage as a whole is pretty low (though I will admit some schools,
among them North Carolina in hoops, are better than others).
To suggest that big-time football and basketball has anything
whatsoever to do with the educational process is not only incorrect,
but a complete hypocrisy. It's no more wrong for a foreign student to
come here and use the system for all it's worth than it is for an
American to do the same thing. After all, the system will use that
person and the person will find it's his own responsibility to make
sure he gets the education he's playing for.
To me it makes no difference whether a student is a native born
American, a foreigner or an alien from another planet. If that person
is qualified to play a particular sport, let him play it under the same
eligibility rules as any American citizen.
American, Land of Opportunity.
John
|
15.176 | let he who is without sin... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:59 | 3 |
| Let's not forget that foreign hired gun for the Tar Heels, "Hank" Rodl.
TTom
|
15.177 | Let me try one more time ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:14 | 21 |
| Only diff TTom is Henrik fully intends on getting his diploma.
Forget about The Dove and Marco for a sec and consider the case of
Andrew Gaze, who helped SHU reach the Final 2 a couple_a years ago. He
has openly admitted that he came over here for one reason: to play
basektball. Once hoops season was over he packed his bags and headed
home - forget about completing the semester! That's a Hired Gun,
folks. It gave SHU a competitive advantage (going out and bringing in
a season pro like Gaze) and it goes against everything that has to do
with the student/athlete concept. (Yes folks, some of us still believe
in that archaic concept.)
This kind of thing is wrong. Flat out wrong. And for those of you who
can't see the difference between Andrew Gaze and Henrik Rodl or Eric
Montross, I can only sadly shake my haid and say (in true Mike Childs
fashion) "You STOOPID!"
(Many ;^)'s after that last crack!)
- ACC Chris
|
15.178 | Eric Montross: Disappointment & Failure Under Smiff | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:29 | 16 |
| Bob, you could go on to also say that Montross, after only a few
months under 'Snuffy, is beginning to walk, talk, and sound like
a *duck*.
People in Hoosierland, who know their hoops, are deeply disappointed
in what's happening to poor Montross. It was his and Bob's tough
luck about the unfortunate contretemps between the Pantheon-dweller
and Eric's old man shyster (when Eric was only a tyke of 10 or so)
that stemmed from Bob's unflinching committment to his players and
to his personal Bob-ethics, that robbed poor Eric of the opportunity
to learn from the Master and forced him to go to a choke-aholic like
Smif'.
Cruel fate knows no mercy.
Big10 Tom
|
15.179 | what did he say? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:38 | 11 |
| > Forget about The Dove and Marco for a sec ...
All fine and good, Chris, but you broght it up with regard to Marco. By
the time Bob Hunt is finished with you and your "looks like" you'll wish
we'd all forget about everything you've said.
Besides, I know the difference between Gaze and Rodl: Gaze is from
Australia and is a better basketball player. Where Montross fits into the
ratings remains to be seen.
TTom
|
15.180 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:45 | 14 |
| Gaze was under pressure from his father to return to Oz and compete on
his hoop team, which floundered without him.
And Chris, when you get a scholarship from a college, they don't, at
least from what I know, ever ask you 'Do you intend to finish all 4
years and get a degree'. They want to make sure you'll arrive in good
shape, you'll go to class and get acceptable grades, and help the team
- and if not, you're gone, unless you're a star like King Rice.
Funny, Chris, Andrew Gaze and this gosh darn foreigners are horrible
for college hoops cause they may be hired guns, yet King Rice, who's a
hired gun who beats up women, are otay in yours and Dean's eyes.
JD
|
15.181 | | DECWET::METZGER | John-man,johnster,johnerino,the j-man... | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:45 | 19 |
|
I agree with Crisp in that bringing in a foreigner whose only intention is to
play basketball is wrong. Andrew Gaze being the best example.
However....how is one to know that the foreign student being brought in has
no intention of attempting to study? You don't. Therefore you can't ban the
schools from bringing these guys in because you might be discriminating against
the guy whose intention is to come to the states, play some hoop and get a
degree also.
Did Manute Bol ever graduate from bridgeport? Did Henfield really never intend
to finish up school or was he pressured into changing his mind? Unless the
admittance board can read minds I don't think you should pass any rules stating
when a foreign player can or can not be brought to a school under scholarship.
that's my HO,
Metz
|
15.182 | Metz raises valid point. (1st point to do so besides me!) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:50 | 14 |
| Correct Metz, there's a difficult if not impossible problem in
proving that they're_a Hired Gun. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, and
doesn't mean it's right.
As to Montross being a failure MorT, I think it's a tad premature for
that label. His numbers right now are solid albiet unspectacular, but
he's shown flashes of being *dominant*.
(Course, when that happens, we'll all here 'bout his boatloads of
talent, but just remember, B10Bigot Doug Ross himself labeled the kid
'journeyman', based on his astute scouting observations.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.183 | So why UNC ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:55 | 27 |
| Okay, Soup, maybe he intends to get his degree. Fine.
So why North Carolina then ??? Indiana and Michigan both offer comparable
undergraduate degree progams, don't they ???
So why The University of North Carolina then ??? In your own words,
Chris, because Snuffy has put 10 out of 17 big men into the NBA and Eric
figured out that was a pretty good ratio.
North Carolina ain't the *ONLY* school in the entire freakin' Milky Way
galaxy to offer undergraduate degree programs, Chris.
By your logic, Eric Montross came to North Carolina and thus did not go to
another school for the singular purpose of getting himself better prepared
to play professional basketball.
And *THAT* is the same thing you dinged Henefeld at Connecticut and Gaze
and Lokar at Seton Hall for yesterday and today. That's the exact same
criteria you used to call these three players "hired guns". You were
advised to drop it early in yesterday's debate but you kept at it ...
You can't have your soup and sip it, too, Soup.
Bob Hunt
P.S. Obviously, Montross ignored Dean's other ratio. You know, that 1 out
of 30 one.
|
15.184 | | MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 15 1991 17:12 | 32 |
| Crisp, don't brandish the ridiculous spectre of Doug Ross' hoops
"expertise" in my face and expect anything but crossed eyes and one
very loudy stinking fart. (Doug routinely communicates to me via
mail seeking my consultancy on college roundball.)
>His numbers right now are solid albiet [sic] unspectacular,
As for Eric, let's just leave it that the word "disappointment" is
being used in his case and that's that. He's shown flashes mainly of
being both poorly used and poorly taught and on the low road to the
middle of Nowhere.
As for Andrew Gaze, let's not forgeth the tens of thousands of dollars
deposited into a trust fund in Andy's name by investors in his dad's
pro team, with the idea being that the dough would serve as a retainer
for his continued services after his return from one year of quality
training in big-time American college hoops.
But many foreign students are true students. Uwe Blab, for one, graduated
with top honors in math or comp sci or somesuch. Or this Watusi kid from
Burundi at Minnesota right now, he's skeering his teammates cuz he's taking
Phsyics as a_*elective*. If anything these foreign students are better
prepared to compete as real students cuz they don't come from America's
sad-sack educational system.
In fack, I just wish that Bob would start recruiting internationally. He
already ties a hand behind his broad muscular back by recruiting only in
the immediate area (IN, IL, OH, & sometimes MI) and not nationally, and
with IU's famous Languages Institute it'd be perfect! Recruit tall Germans
Bob!!
Big10 Tom
|
15.185 | Talkin' outta both sides again | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Fri Feb 15 1991 17:31 | 21 |
| � Correct Metz, there's a difficult if not impossible problem in
� proving that they're_a Hired Gun. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, and
� doesn't mean it's right.
Yesterday it was real easy to spot a "hired gun", right ??? Hey, if it
looked like, acted like, and sounded like, it was case closed and "Nuf
said". Now today, it's difficult if not impossible to spot one.
How about if we make this easy for you ... they're all hired guns. They
play basketball and receive financial incentives to do so. Their
nationalities, their study habits, and their graduation rates have
*nothing* to do with this simple fact.
And as for Eric Montross and his performance so far, I think it speaks
loud and clear volumes that young Mr. Montross won't even come close to
earning ACC Rookie Of The Year. Rodney Rogers is a lock for that. In
fact, I don't think Montross has even won a single ACC Rookie Of The Week
award. Pretty sorry performance for the 1990 High School Player Of The
Year, wouldn't you say ??? Somehow I don't think you will.
Sir Robert of Hunt
|
15.186 | | SACT41::ROSS | Prepared food, prepared dude! | Mon Feb 18 1991 07:13 | 9 |
| What a game yesterday. Ohio State beat Indiana 97-95 in double OT. Jimmy
Jackson was immense yesterday, hitting the shot to send it into the first OT
and making the pass to Treg Lee to set up the winning hoop. Damon Bailey
was fantastic as well for the Hoosiers scoring a career best {short career}
32 points and taking charge after Calbert Cheaney fouled out. Bailey did miss
a FT near the end of regulation that would have given the Hoosiers a 3 point
lead, but he also hit some big shots and handled the ball very well. At
some point, MrT is going to have to pull the old switcheroo and start calling
for Damon's HOF induction.
|
15.187 | Was not to be... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 18 1991 08:55 | 12 |
|
I didn't get to see all of this one (I wish I had), only the
overtimes. Indiana did just about everything possible to give it away
at the end of the first overtime. With a four-point lead, they seemed
to let down on defense, forced a bad shot with plenty of time left on
the shot clock in their next-to-last possession, didn't take a time out
and got off only an off-balance heave on the last possession. Most
unlike a Bob Knight-coached team, after having seemingly pulled off the
upset on the road with their best player on the bench...
glenn
|
15.188 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Naw Saw's the guy that beats up Evan | Mon Feb 18 1991 09:17 | 13 |
|
Definately one of the best college games I've seen all year. Neither team
could get more than a 4 point lead at any time. I could have watched a
dozen overtimes in this one. While IU did loose Calbert, OSU overcame the
loss of their pointman Baker. Of course this is where JJ showed his versitily
moving to point forward and controling the game for OSU. As Doug said Damon
lived up to his advanced billing. OSU as Dicky was pointing out didn't use
Carter enough as IU had no real answers defensively for him.
I like Vitale on ABC he tones down his act alot and doesn't feel like he has
to talk from start to finish without loosing his enthusiasium...
mike
|
15.189 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Mon Feb 18 1991 09:39 | 15 |
| Damon Bailey comes of age. A monster game.
I thought it was a riot listening to Keith Jackson do the play-by-play.
Boy, did he sound uncomfortable away from the football field. I was
expecting him to yell "FUMBLE" whenever a loose ball rolled by. Lots of
his trademark expressions like "Oh, my goodness" and "Oh, baby". It was
just way too much excitement for him with critical plays every 30 seconds
or so.
And is there anyone out there who does not yet know that the initials "P"
and "T" when placed together mean "Playing Time" ??? Vitale insists on
over-explaining what he thinks are his little nuances. "Jent is getting
the PT (playing time), baby, that's where it counts, baby."
Bob Hunt
|
15.190 | Great game yesterday - congrats to OSU. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 10:33 | 21 |
| re: Montross
I pick up my paper Saturday and see stats as follows:
FGA-FGM FTA-FTM PTS
R Rogers 4 - 6 1 - 4 9
G. Hill 2 - 4 0 - 0 4
Montross 4 - 4 1 - 1 9
Eric won't be rookie-of-the-year, but he's playing *solid* basketball.
Keep in mind he's playing behind a guy who'll probably be in the NBA.
(Chilcutt)
Eric's not even getting close to the minutes of other freshmen in
the league or the country. Eric knew this coming in. Dean's had
the luxury of bringing him along slowly and is taking advantage of
it.
- ACC Chris
|
15.191 | One more time, with feeling | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:39 | 39 |
| > By your logic, Eric Montross came to North Carolina and thus did not go to
> another school for the singular purpose of getting himself better prepared
> to play professional basketball.
> And *THAT* is the same thing you dinged Henefeld at Connecticut and Gaze
> and Lokar at Seton Hall for yesterday and today. That's the exact same
> criteria you used to call these three players "hired guns". You were
> advised to drop it early in yesterday's debate but you kept at it ...
You seem to be having a little problem with this concept Ketch, so have
a swig of java, put yer thinkin' cap on, sit back, and read carefully
whilst I try one more time ...
Eric Montross came to North Carolina (by his own admission) for TWO
reasons:
1. To get his degree. (pre-law)
2. To give him the best possible shot of earning the big bucks in the pros
There's two reasons there. TWO. 2. T-W-O. DOS. II.
He chose North Carolina over other schools because of the basketball angle,
but that in no way eliminates the fact that he wanted to get his degree. To
take it a step further to prove the point, the kid wanted to major in
pre-law. Not every school woulda sufficed in that category. North Carolina
fit the bill on BOTH counts.
I've dinged Gaze and The Dove and Locar because they couldn't care about
#1, only #2. Do you think any of these kids cared about what kinda majors
SHU or UConn offered? I think not. I *know* Gaze couldn't care. He
was a classic Hired Gun. The fact that Locar followed in his footsteps
to the same school gives credence to my 'Looks like_a, Acts Like_a,
Sounds Like_a, ... Probably is' theory.
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
15.192 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:43 | 46 |
| re 1
Just what is this "solid" basketball you keep harping about, Crisp?
Solid like a cigar store Indian... as in STIFF?
re The Game
Classic game, but when it came crunch time the Hoosiers couldn't answer
the bell, having blown not one, not two, not... you get the idea, they
had several chances to win the thing and they never closed. Granted, the
Bucks played relentless D, but no more so at the end than at the tipoff.
Here's how the Hoosiers blew the game (in approximate sequence):
- Damon missing 2 foul shots (2-4) in the last minute of regulation which
directly cost the win.
- Calbert's *unbelievably* sloppy display of dribbing which allowed the
other teams center to steal the ball at midcourt. With 20 seconds to
go all they had to do at that point was dribble the game out.
- The referee's gutless inability to then call Perry for carrying the
ball a la Barry Sanders atop his shoulder for two full steps on his way
to the slam-jam.
- In the first OT, Gregg Graham failing to see Damon wide open underneath
for several seconds as the final seconds of the first OT ticked away,
thus missing a sure lay-in for the win.
- In the second OT, Indiana's abject inability to stop Ohio State from
grabbing offensive rebounds allowing them extra shots four straight
trips down the floor. The centerless Hoosiers were outrebounded by at
least 15 on the game.
- Both clutch plays by JJ occured on called plays where he took the ball
on the right side and dribbled straight down the paint. On the first
one, his bucket, Indiana had only the hapless Matt Nover to take him on
with predictable results. On the second, his dump off, Indiana was
forced to double team - a practice the Hoosiers rarely engage in but
were forced to revert to for lack of a widebody in the middle.
The good news: Damon Bailey finally arrived as a player. True, he choked
at the line and cost his team a win, but he found his range from outside
at long last.
Big10 Tom
|
15.193 | Truth | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:50 | 15 |
| >He chose North Carolina over other schools for the basketball angle...
Eric Montross publicly expressed a desire to play for home state hero
Bob, but underwent extreme pressure from his father who publicly stated
that he'd do anything to stop him from playing for Knight, after Bob
publicly humiliated Eric Sr. into returning tens of thousands of dollars
to the disabled ex-Hoosier player Landon Turner when Eric Sr. tried to
take a full 50% of Turner's court damages awared as his lawyer in a lawsuit
against an automaker.
After that, it became a choice between Michigan (Eric Sr.'s alma mater)
and the field. That being so, it cain thus be said that Dean Smith edged
out Steve Fisher in the recruiting battle for Eric Jr.'s services.
Big10 Tom
|
15.194 | | SACT41::ROSS | Prepared food, prepared dude! | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:56 | 16 |
| Chris,
Who has developed more basketball-wise this season - Damon Bailey or Eric
Montross? What one factor is responsible for that happening? Do you think
Montross would be in the same stage of development/production had he gone to
IU?
True or False:
Eric Montross was overrated by all of the experts last year who
rated him the top big man in the senior class. He should not
have been expected to contribute anything beyond limited minutes
and coincidental offense to the Tar Heels. He should not have
been held up to the high standards usually expected of the top
freshman big man in the country {like the Mourning's, Ewing's,
O'Neal's, Laettner's, etc.}
|
15.195 | OSU, OSU, OSU, OSU | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:56 | 7 |
|
Yesterdays game was the best I've seen Ohio State play in their
last several attempts. I would have liked to of seen them play more
full court though. I think they got the last second basket down pat
right now.
Hal
|
15.196 | Bottom line: He's wearing 00 for Carolina. :^) :^) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 11:57 | 8 |
| Listening to MrT's whining about no big man during his game analysis,
then explaining how one of the best big men in Indiana HS
history got away is truly music to my ears!
Haw haw haw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111
- ACC Chris
|
15.197 | Bad comparison, but great timing Mr. Ross! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:06 | 17 |
| Everybody knows that it's tougher for big men to adjust to the
college game than the little guys. But I do find it funny that you'd
offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far). If he'd had
his usual 8 points or so would you be so forthcoming? [no]
As to your phony question, it all boils down to unrealistic expectations
placed on 17 or 18 year olds by the media. Kids who haven't even made
a single collegiate hoop are hailed as the next Walton, West, or Russell.
It's ridiculous, but it sells. (Only thing that matters, media-wise.)
The logical mind would have to say it's much more meaningful to judge a
coach based on the delta between when a player entered school and when he
left. Toward this end I'd offer 2nd tier HS talents Rick Fox
and Pete Chilcutt as evidence of Dean's tutelage.
- ACC Chris
|
15.198 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:09 | 14 |
| Montross would definitely be playing much better right now if he
were with Indiana. He looks the same now as he did last year with
Lawrence Central. Especially shocking is that he's still allowed
to play that shuffling high school footwork, playing with his legs
too close together, standing to straight, with his arms too far from
his body. Eric's lack of technical improvement positively screams
out for some coaching. Like any big main, he needs to be taught to
keep his center of gravity under better control. Flailing around
like a goose flapping his wings don't cut it. He has no natural moves
and therefore must be taught them. Question, of all these big men
supposedly in the NBA cuz a 'Snuffy's genius, were any a them white
guys?
Big10 Tom
|
15.199 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:12 | 6 |
| Joe Wolf
Mitch Kupchak
Tommy LeGarde
- ACC Chris
|
15.200 | tutelage = ensilage | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:13 | 14 |
| > The logical mind would have to say it's much more meaningful to judge a
> coach based on the delta between when a player entered school and when he
> left. Toward this end I'd offer 2nd tier HS talents Rick Fox
> and Pete Chilcutt as evidence of Dean's tutelage.
And where does that leave King "1st tier" Rice?
Actually, one of the culprits in the hype has to be the Baby Blue
Propoganda Machine, who continue to write about the greatest recruiting
class in the history of college basketball. And for those who notice this
type of thing, they'll still be ranting and raving about Dean after he
fails to win *IT* with this gang.
TTom
|
15.201 | Media Perception <> Reality | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:15 | 8 |
| Fine. Throw in King Rice. He's having an excellent senior year and
has progressed drastically since his freshman year.
(BTW, the delta I'm talking about is how good the player *really* is
when he enters college, not how long his press clippings are.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.202 | Not Knight's best coaching job yesterday | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The elbow is part of the ball | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:15 | 26 |
| >- The referee's gutless inability to then call Perry for carrying the
> ball a la Barry Sanders atop his shoulder for two full steps on his way
> to the slam-jam.
I don't think guts had anything to do with it. The ref called the foul
on Chaney before Perry took his steps. He never went in for the
slam-jam, but stepped to the line and sank the crucial two freebies.
Chaney was rightfully disgusted with himself. He has no business
exposing the ball like that.
With all the strength the Hoosiers have at guard, particularly
Reynolds, I'm surprised Knight didn't pressure the ball a lot more once
OSU lost their point man. Jackson was dog tired at the end of the
game, and with more pressure this could have made a difference.
Speaking of their lack of a big man, what happened to top 50 recruit
Lawson? Hasn't Knight developed the kid in two years, and given him
those famous "extra points" on defense?
JJ locked up big 10 player of the year yesterday, didn't he. At the
end of regulation, I was surprised to see him step into the back court
with 10 seconds left to receive the inbounds pass. Turned out to be
excellent strategy considering the Hoosiers almost never picked him up.
Dan
|
15.203 | Soup invents history once again | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Mon Feb 18 1991 12:23 | 23 |
| � Everybody knows that it's tougher for big men to adjust to the
� college game than the little guys.
Oh, really ???
Lew Alcindor's freshmen team at UCLA beat the defending NCAA champion
varsity squad in a preseason scrimmage. Patrick Ewing led the Georgetown
Hoyas into the NCAA final his freshman year where they lost to your team
who, by the way, had stud sophomore Sam Perkins at center. Akeem Olajuwon
had barely even played the sport and Houston made three straight trips to
the Final Four. Shaquille O'Neal had scouts panting last year and he's
got them babbling even more this year.
Another Soup Scud excuse-theory shot down in flames. Lemme help you with
your theory ...
� Everybody knows that it's tougher for *MEDIOCRE* big men to adjust to
� the college game than the little guys, especially when given *MEDIOCRE*
� tutelage.
You're welcome.
Bob Hunt
|
15.204 | In Search of Excellence | SACT41::ROSS | Prepared food, prepared dude! | Mon Feb 18 1991 13:05 | 5 |
| > Joe Wolf
> Mitch Kupchak
> Tommy LeGarde
Eric Montross --- "The Tom LeGarde of the 90's" --- has a nice ring to it.
|
15.205 | Eric shoulda redshirted | SACT41::ROSS | Wolf,Kupchak,LeGarde,Montross | Mon Feb 18 1991 13:17 | 17 |
| >But I do find it funny that you'd
> offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far).
Wait a sec... weren't you the one who posted Montross' big 9 point game as
compared to Grant Hill and Rodney Rogers 4 and 9 point games as some sort
of indicator of Eric's progress? Didn't you just do that today???
> If he'd had
> his usual 8 points or so would you be so forthcoming? [no]
Wrong again... Damon's averaging 12.? right now and is probably averaging close
to 16-18 in the Big 10 games. He's led the team in scoring a couple times in
the past few weeks, scoring 21 and 19. After a slow start, Knight has seen
the on-court skills are too good to leave on the bench. The playing time
Bailey gets just brings him along faster. Tell me the Montross would not be
better off playing 30 minutes a game in the Big 10... And he wouldn't be
an afterthought on the offensive end like he is now.
|
15.206 | | CARP::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Feb 18 1991 14:43 | 21 |
| >Speaking of their lack of their lack of a big man, what happened to
>top 50 recruit Lawson?
I don't remember Lawson ever having been highly ranked. He in fact
was by a wide margin the lowest ranked of his recruiting class, wasn't
he? From the first I heard of Chris Lawson he was described as a
"project" who looked like a career reserve. He's very slow, has short
arms and small hands, doesn't jump well, but has a nice shooting touch
for those rare moments when he does manage to successfully receive the
ball in the middle.
But, to answer: He's been beat out by Matt Nover, another project who
was originally slated as a substitute forward.
>The ref called the foul on Chaney before Perry took his steps.
The ref called the foul for a reach-around from behind about 20 feet
from the hoop after Cheaney'd caught up with Carter several steps after
the obvious travel.
Big10 Tom
|
15.207 | ACC, phone home...for help! | SHALOT::MEDVID | to discover war is not the answer | Mon Feb 18 1991 15:33 | 12 |
| >>But I do find it funny that you'd
>> offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far).
>
>Wait a sec... weren't you the one who posted Montross' big 9 point game as
>compared to Grant Hill and Rodney Rogers 4 and 9 point games as some sort
>of indicator of Eric's progress? Didn't you just do that today???
Ewwwwww, good one there, Doug. I can't wait to see what kind of
"Yes, but..." hypocritical response that one's gonna get!
--dan'l
|
15.208 | | SACT41::ROSS | Not a damn yankee anymore | Mon Feb 18 1991 15:44 | 7 |
| >I can't wait to see what kind of
> "Yes, but..." hypocritical response that one's gonna get!
Oh, I got a response. Sort of a "waving the white flag" response. But
Digital policy prevents me from posting personal mail without the author's
permission. Can I Chris? Chris-er-ino? Chris-Man? Christo of Knorropolis?
Chrismeister?
|
15.209 | Still celebrating my new freedom to generalize | SHALOT::HUNT | Blessed are the peacemakers ... | Mon Feb 18 1991 15:52 | 9 |
| Say no more, Doug. The picture is loud and clear.
Besides, I'm sure you wouldn't deceive us. After all, if it looks like a
surrender, acts like a surrender, and sounds like a surrender, then it
must be a surrender.
Nuf said.
Bob Hunt
|
15.210 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:13 | 14 |
| Chris can always revert to his "Blame it on the media" arguement - that
always works. Why, he even kinda worked in to his .201.
The FBI's anti-organized crime unit could use Chris, that's fer sure.
Just plop him down anywhere and let him point out hired guns. HE sure
seems to know a lot about them. Heck, he even *knows* what Gaze, Locur
and the Dove were *really* thinking. He's simply amazing. The real
fack in those cases are that they are from the Big East and are
foreign. That's the only reasons there are. But hey, I'd rather have
a women-beater on MY team, and praise the guy, then have a *gasp*
foreigner who might be *gasp* a hired gun. Perhaps if those three had
punched a few women around, they'd be more accepted.
JD
|
15.211 | Item 2B: come to the dome and pay homage | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:20 | 4 |
| Looks like we need to see Knorr's unconditional withdrawl list of
conditions and linkages...
TTom
|
15.212 | ;-) | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bullwinkle Roooools | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:20 | 35 |
| Great game yesterday between IU ansd OSU. Made even better by having
the wife wif me.
Wife "Now what game are you watching..."
ME :Ohio State and Indiana - 2 of the top teams in the country.
Wife: Why's that one team look so slow and short?
Me: Oh, that's Indiana, their players are alwasy slow and short, but
all of them are playing out of position.
Wife: They don't look like ball players, sure hope they study...
ME: Yep, they all study, in fact, the slowest and shortest and most of
position guys out there are all graduate students.
Wife: Really? Do they still get scholarships? Which one is there
coach?
Me: Scholarships? Surely you jest, theyse guys play hoops just to be
near the master, Bob Knight (point Bob out).
WIfe: Geeez, he's got a pot stomach - the other coach looks better.
I still can't believe they are playing so close - they must be playing
their hearts out.
Me: Yep, overachieving to the max. After the game, they all do
volunteer work around town, and then study all night.
Wife(at end of game): Too bad they lost - but for a bunch of slow,
short, out of position, volunteering grad students - they sure do play
well. If only they could get a big man...
JD
|
15.213 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:37 | 6 |
| HAH!
I just let out a whoop.... which I tried to strangle in mid whoop... and
that guy's looking over the cube at me again.
Mike JN
|
15.214 | In true Dean fashion, always congratulate the opponent. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:39 | 11 |
| Actually I commend Mr. Ross for some fine logical thinking. I even
went so far as to send him some congratulatory remarks via e-mail.
The ultimate issue at hand is Playing Time. Eric's not getting as much
as he would've had he gone to IU, Michigan, or just about any other
school north of LSU. I certainly can't blame Dean for this. Chilcutt
is playing ahead of him and is having a terrific season. Montross'
time will come, I'm confident of that.
- ACC Chris
|
15.215 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:41 | 20 |
| Classic, JD, absolutely classic.... I'm still laughing.....:-)
Only wish my future wife had such amazing perception skills when it
comes to Basketball....:-)
Of course it isn't as funny as watching ACChris try to get up from
every thundering blow that he suffers in this notesfile.
Hey ACChris, a couple of things....
1: Montross has been a HUGE disappointment this year...
2: Dean can't develop a big man unless he is an incredible
talent coming out of school. Remember the old-adage,
you can't coach size(the NBA loves those wide-bodies).
Name one big-man that Dean developed that was not a
highly rated HS All-American.
3: Henrik Rodl and Kenny Harris were both higher rated recruits
than Lawson was...
Rodl was being hailed as the next Detlef Schrempf and Harris
was supposed to take over for King Rice. What happened?
|
15.216 | Harris could be good... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Mon Feb 18 1991 16:45 | 8 |
| > Rodl was being hailed as the next Detlef Schrempf and Harris
> was supposed to take over for King Rice. What happened?
Rodl became a hired gun at Chapel Hill and Harris is still looking for
some girl to beat up. In typcial Dean fashion, Rice will teach Harris to
congratulate the girl.
TTom
|
15.217 | Big Ten Saturday and Sunday | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:55 | 117 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-18-91) NCAA
Date: 18 Feb 91 22:04:57 GMT
Saturday:
#32 MICHIGAN STATE 62, #38 Illinois 58: The Spartans held on as
Illinois sliced an 8-point deficit to just 3 in the final minutes.
The Spartans had leads of up to 9 points in the second half, and as
little as nothing, but regained the 8-point lead in the final four
minutes, and needed some free throws down the stretch to salt it
away. The first half was very closely contested, and after a very
hot start by both teams, it stagnated into a 26-26 deadlock at the
break. Illinois came out cold in the second half, and Deon Thomas
sprained an ankle which cost him some second half playing time. MSU
built a 38-29 lead before the Illini came back to tie the game at
45-all and 47-all. But, State built the winning 59-51 lead, and
weathered a trey and another nice shot which cut the score down
to 59-56. Andy Pennick made some big free throws late. Steve Smith
scored 24 points, but he's still off of "his" game. After making 42
straight free throws earlier this year, he was just 7 of 13 in this
game, and only 8 of 19 from the field. Andy Kaufmann had 21 for the
Illini. A friend of mine Saturday night said "the refs stole the
game from us". I guess there were lots of bad calls in this game,
and Lou got a marginal T, but the refs were probably gracious by not
giving him a second T late when he probably deserved one. 15,138 at
Breslin...
#48 PURDUE 89, #79 Minnesota 82: Purdue almost blew a 13-point lead
in the final 3 minutes, but Chuckie White made sure the five-game
losing skid ended. Up 78-65 with only 3:20 left, the Gophers went
on a shooting tear and got within 79-76 with almost a minute left.
But, some free throws and a White dunk off of a steal won it.
Again, the Gophers were terribly outscored from the foul line, this
time 39 to 16 (that's not the worst this year, even!). But, they
foul ALOT. It didn't help them in this game that they got down by
as much as 71-57 in the final five minutes, and 78-65 as I
mentioned. The strategy became one of fouling, as Purdue has not
distinguished itself at the stripe this season. But, when Chuckie
White can nail 16 of 21, the gods are on your side. Minnesota's
11-1 run until the :55.6 mark, cutting the lead to 79-76, was a thing
of beauty. Several of the shots made were of the "circus" variety,
and a couple of Purdue throwaways in the backcourt helped things
along. This game was like all the others, though. Minnesota led
most of the game's first 10 minutes, then Purdue got hot and built a
five point lead until Rob Metcalf, who scored 16 points, drained a
three at the halftime horn, to cut the Purdue lead to 36-34. Purdue
then struggled a bit out of the second half gate, but got hot
again, and built the aforementioned 14-point lead before wilting.
But, this lead was just too much for Minnesota to overcome. Jimmy
Oliver led Purdue with 30, though he vanished in the game's final
minutes. White had a well-deserved 16 points. Walter Bond had 15
and Arriel McDonald 13 for the Gophers. 14,123 on hand at Mackey...
#52 Michigan 64, #223 NORTHWESTERN 58: The Wolverines held off the
pesky Wildcats' bid to finally win a conference game. Michigan
trailed by 5 at halftime, 30-25, and the NU lead got as large as 7
in the second half. But, Demetrius Calip put the Wolverines ahead
for good midway through the second half with a three pointer, as he
scored 17 points. The loss, NU's 14th straight, helped give them
their longest skid since 1955-56. Kevin Rankin, who scored 19
against Michigan State the other night, was scoreless. Charles
Howell and Pat Baldwin each had 16, though. 7,278 at Welsh-Ryan...
#49 Wisconsin 56, #47 IOWA 55: The Badgers did blow a 13-point lead
in the final 5 minutes, but a Brian Good trey at the horn gave back
the victory. The win was Wisconsin's 5th straight in this series.
The Badgers led 49-36 with just 5:47 left (that's right, just
36 points for Iowa in 34 minutes!), before the Hawkeyes took the
lead, incredibly, in the final seconds. Iowa finally took that lead
with just 6 ticks left when Kevin Smith hit a trey. But, on the
ensuing inbound pass from John Ellenson, muscle-man Patrick Tompkins
dribbled the ball just past halfcourt and fed Good, who took a step
back behind the line and won the game. The halftime score was Iowa
18, Wisconsin 17, which is hard to believe in this era. But,
Wisconsin got Iowa playing it's pace, and it eventually worked out
for them. The Hawkeyes were a pathetic 22 of 72 from the floor
(30.5%), taking 25 more fielders and just one less FT than
Wisconsin. The two teams combined to shoot just 6 of 31 from
three-point land, as the Badgers won this one ugly. Tompkins led
the Badgers with 17 points, and Smith had 13 for Dr. Tom. 15,500 at
Carver-Hawkeye...
Sunday:
#4 OHIO STATE 97, #2 Indiana 95 (2OT): One of the best games you
will ever see, but I couldn't! I did get to listen to the two
overtimes, though, and St. John Arena has never been louder. Jim
Jackson hit the tying shot to send the game to overtime, and Treg
Lee's baseline J won it with :02 left in the second overtime. The
Buckeyes had to erase a five-point deficit at the end of regulation
to force the first OT, and a four-point deficit at the end of the
first extra-session to force the second, in what was a very
frustrating loss for Indiana. The Buckeyes also overcame the loss
of point guard Mark Baker in the first half, as he injured an ankle
and will miss the next week or so (definitely will miss the game at
Illinois Wednesday). Damon Bailey was tremendous in the OT's,
scoring 17 of his career-high 32 points. Jim Jackson was great as
well, scoring 30 and snaring 11 boards. Didn't you think OSU was
dead just before the end of regulation? IU was up 77-74, in
possession of the ball, in the hands of Calbert Cheaney, no less?
And he had the ball stripped. OSU hit two FTs, and then after IU
made just one FT at the other end, Jackson tied the game with one
tick left. Wow! And Bailey had missed a couple of FTs down the
stretch. The Hoosiers then missed a really good chance to
win the game at the end of the first OT, as OSU had tied it with :45
left. But, the Hoosiers just couldn't get it to drop. Jamie
Skelton hit some huge shots for the Buckeyes in the second
overtime, as he saw extra duty due to Baker's injury. Indiana
missed a tough trey at the very final horn from Pat Graham. Knight
said, "Obviously, it's a game we really would like to have won. We
had our chances, and we can't ask for a hell of alot more than that".
13,276 in Columbus...
[....]
|
15.218 | Purdue defeats Michigan 2OT Monday night | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:59 | 96 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-19-91) NCAA
Date: 19 Feb 91 16:49:09 GMT
Monday's Result:
#48 Purdue 83, #52 MICHIGAN 77 (2OT): These two teams decided that
what Indiana and Ohio State did Sunday was fun, so they did it, too.
This was a pretty entertaining game for two second-division teams.
Michigan led all of the first half, or nearly all of it, but
couldn't shake Purdue, taking a 38-35 lead into the lockerroom.
Both teams shot well, especially Purdue, which hit at 60%. The
second half was a completely different story, though, as both teams
were cold. However, Purdue, over the first 9:30 of the second half,
outscored Michigan 14-4, taking a 49-42 lead. But, Michigan hit a
three and caught fire, going on a 12-1 run of it's own and building
a 54-50 lead. They had several chances to up that lead as Purdue
continued to struggle (going nearly 10 minutes between field goals),
but failed, and Purdue managed to regain a 59-57 lead inside of the
final minute. The Boilers even had possession of the ball with that
lead, and 31.9 seconds remaining, when Matt Painter couldn't make an
inbounds pass in 5 seconds, turning the ball over. After running
the clock, Demetrius Calip, who scored at least 32 points in the
game, hit a short J with 1.9 seconds left to tie the game. A
desparation heave from Painter to Craig Riley under the basket nearly
resulted in a Purdue win, but he was too far behind the backboard.
Purdue led nearly all of the first overtime, and still had a 69-66
lead with 20 seconds to go. But, Kirk Taylor hit about a 23-foot
trey with 12 seconds left to tie the game again, and Purdue never
managed to get a shot off before the horn sounded. So, tied again
at 69, Michigan raced out quickly in the second OT and seemingly put
the game away. Calip started out with a three, then after a Riley
free throw cut the score to 72-70, the Wolverines scored five more,
three on a trey and two more on a Sam Mitchell slam. Down 77-70,
with just over 3 minutes left, the game changed again for good.
Matt Painter hit a three to cut the deficit to 77-73, then Michigan
began a series of terrible offensive possessions in which it took
either hurried or ill-advised shots. With Painter's three, Purdue
scored the final 13 points of this game, mostly on Chuckie White,
Riley, and Jimmy Oliver fielders and ensuing FTs. Dick Vitale
became quite critical of Steve Fisher's not having his team run the
clock after getting the big lead. It was a shocking turnaround in
the second overtime, that's for sure. James Voskuil had a big game
for Michigan, scoring 16, while Craig Riley again outplayed his
namesake, Eric Riley, getting a career-high (23, maybe?). Oliver
and White also were big scorers for Purdue, before alot of empty
seats up at Crisler Arena...
Wednesday:
#4 Ohio State at #38 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm CST
(no major TV, but if you want to listen to it, you can catch the OSU
network on WWWE out of Cleveland (around 1100 am?), or the Illinois
network on WLS, 890 am, Chicago. Both are 50,000 watt stations...
As someone pointed out yesterday, Mark Baker has a badly turned
ankle and most likely will not play. Also, Deon Thomas turned his
ankle at Michigan State Saturday and was hobbling around at practice
yesterday, so his status for Wednesday is still undetermined...)
Thursday:
#47 Iowa at #2 INDIANA 7:00 pm
#49 Wisconsin at #52 MICHIGAN 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#48 Purdue at #32 MICHIGAN STATE Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#79 Minnesota at #4 OHIO STATE 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#38 Illinois at #47 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#223 Northwestern at #49 WISCONSIN 1:00 pm
#52 Michigan at #2 INDIANA 3:00 pm ABC
Next Monday:
#32 Michigan State at #79 MINNESOTA 8:30 pm ESPN
RECORDS:
New
Sagarin AP CNN School Overall Big Ten
------- -- --- ------ ------- -------
4 2 2 Ohio State 22-1 12-1
2 4 4 Indiana 22-3 10-2
38 26T 35 Illinois 18-7 8-4
32 42 40 Michigan State 15-8 8-5
49 NR 45 Wisconsin 12-10 6-6
47 44 50 Iowa 17-8 6-7
48 NR NR Purdue 13-10 5-8
52 NR NR Michigan 12-11 5-8
79 NR NR Minnesota 10-12 3-9
223 NR NR Northwestern 5-18 0-13
|
15.219 | Iowa beats Indiana | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Feb 22 1991 07:27 | 4 |
| Iowa upset Indiana, 80-79 in OT. The Hoosiers missed a series of free
throws that could have won the game in regulation.
TTom
|
15.220 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Whatever Homer wants, Homer gets... | Fri Feb 22 1991 07:49 | 4 |
| I guess Bob's had the guys hitting the books instead of practicin'
their free throws.
/Don
|
15.221 | Don't think we'll hear any Bailey > Montross stuff today :^) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 22 1991 08:57 | 6 |
| Extract from Iowa @ IU box score:
Bailey 0-3,0-2 0
- ACC Chris
|
15.222 | Had to be said | SHALOT::HUNT | Same Old World Order | Fri Feb 22 1991 09:04 | 3 |
| Bailey is better than Montross.
Bob Hunt
|
15.223 | stiff | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Fri Feb 22 1991 09:09 | 3 |
| You're right, Chris. Montross is much more a stiff than Bailey.
TTom
|
15.224 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Feb 22 1991 13:41 | 27 |
| Wail, as sad as this turn a events is at least I won't have to put
up with you people sniffing and sneering about how I'm a Ross-style
poor-mouther... given that the season is progressing very nicely
along its way towards fulfilling my bold preseason prognostication.
Here's the scoop:
- Hoosiers cain't go on winning despite being consistently outrebounded
by 10-15 boards and blocking/changing almost no shots inside.
- Hoosiers' depth and talent is partly myth: this is a team of point
guards, who are missing a center, a widebody forward reserve, and
a_outside shooting threat.
- Hoosiers' weaknesses were masked by unusually easy preconference and
conference schedule cuz a_a confluence a_events with opponents' programs.
- Hoosiers are a dangerous team but a limited one who waver when up against
your modern sytle quick/strong widebody front lines - they'll croak in
the tourney against a much lower ranked team like LSU. A team with the
physical limitations of this one could only be truly dangerous when they
a senior (not sophomore) dominated.
- Damon Bailey had his career game after his opposite exited the Ohio State
game with a_ankle injury. He's gonna have his problems when up against
big-time quickness like he saw with last night's Iowa frosh.
Big10 Tom
|
15.225 | Musta been the refs | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Mon Feb 25 1991 08:58 | 4 |
| Poor little Indiana struggled and barely got passsed the far superior
Michigan Wolverines, 112-79.
TTom
|
15.226 | Looks like y'all were payin' attention | SHALOT::HUNT | Same Old World Order | Mon Feb 25 1991 10:37 | 7 |
| Saw in today's paper that Acie Earl, Iowa's stud widebody, got picked up
for assaulting a female student.
What gives, Big Tenners ??? You got your hoop riots and now your woman
beaters ... you guys been taking notes from the ACC or what ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.227 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 25 1991 14:29 | 28 |
| re 1
If you're looking for hoops riots, I refer you to the Big East, the
Big8, and the SEC. We have no hoops riots in the Big10.
As for the woman-beating allegation, remember: "Innocent until proven
guilty." And even then, if it does turn out that Acie is a Univeristy
of North Carolina at Chapel Hell-scumbag, the matter of face will STILL
hinge on whether Dr. Malpractice tacitly endorses gal-abuse as did
Reverend Underachievement.
re 2
Indiana's perfect opponnet, another team with no inside game. Steal
got outrebounded by 5, but that's much less than is usual against
the good squads. Indiana blew out the Wolverines cuz they're more
talented, if just as stunted. G-g-give it u-up, TTom, you cain't
dispute what your main main said yesterday:
I don't see Indiana going that far. They lack the big man,
the inside game, to be able to make a run for it in the tourney.
Jim Vulvano, 2/29/91
Big10 Tom
|
15.228 | Big Ten last Wednesday | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:15 | 39 |
| Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-21-91) NCAA
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 1991 16:14:50 GMT
Wednesday's Result:
#5 Ohio State 73, #36 ILLINOIS 64: I found out an hour before
tipoff that I was going to the game! The game had its moments, but
really wasn't very well played by either team. Illinois missed
countless "bunnies", and Ohio State couldn't hit a jumper to save
them. The Buckeyes were definitely "off" last night, as their
offensive execution was terrible, mostly relying on one-on-one
moves to get shots. Because they could not hit a J, Illinois just
sat back in a 2-3 zone most of the game, and watched the Buckeyes
pass the ball around the perimeter. Neither Mark Baker nor Deon
Thomas played, so the effects were probably neutralized. Ohio
State led most of the game's first 10 minutes, but Illinois had
one of its best streaks of the game in taking a 26-22 lead. But,
over the final 7 minutes of the half, the Buckeyes outscored them
17-6, including a 10-0 run, and took a 39-32 lead to the lockerroom.
The second half was much sloppier. Ohio State took an early 44-35
lead, but Illinois answered with 8 straight points to close to
44-43. The Buckeyes were still only up one at 50-49 with 8:35 left
and shortly thereafter by 54-53, but Chris Jent finally hit a
Buckeye trey to lead 57-53, and Treg Lee, who scored 14 points, made
a huge rebound and basket for a 66-60 lead. Andy Kaufmann picked up
a T in the final 20 seconds when saying the magic words after a
bizarre charge as he attempted a three-pointer. Ohio State
outscored Illinois by 13 points from the stripe, though the Buckeyes
committed more second half fouls until the final couple of minutes
when the Illini fouled on purpose. Both teams shot 43% from the
field. Andy Kpedi probably had his finest game in an Illini
uniform, picking up the slack for Thomas. Alex Davis had a nice
game as he seemed to fill in most for Baker. Jim Jackson had a bad
night. Illinois blew countless second half opportunities to tie the
game. They just never could get over the hump, as Ohio State always
answered with a clutch rebound or hoop. Just over 13,000 at the
Assembly Hall, mostly non-believers of an upset at that...
|
15.229 | Big Ten last Thursday | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:23 | 63 |
| Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-22-91) NCAA
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 1991 18:24:02 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#50 Iowa 79, #3 INDIANA 78 (OT): The Hoosiers inability to hit a
free throw at the end of regulation (they missed six straight), and
the blowing of a 16-point second half lead doomed them last night,
as James Moses tipped in a missed Chris Street tip of an Acie Earl
bomb, at the first overtime horn. Iowa enjoyed a huge rebounding
advantage, and cleaned up at the stripe, as the Hoosiers ended up
missing 15 of 34 attempts. This is truly an amazing result, as IU
had beaten the Hawkeyes by 11 at Iowa City earlier, and makes it
much easier for Ohio State to win the Big Ten. The loss also may
have made the arguments about Indiana possibly being a #1 seed in
the tournament moot. This was Iowa's first win at Assembly Hall
since 1985. The Hawkeyes jumped out to a 5-0 lead as IU couldn't
find the mark. Once the Hoosiers got rolling, they led most of the
first half, and took a 35-32 lead to the lockerroom. They blitzed
Iowa during the first six minutes of the second half, going on a
15-2 run fueled by 9 points by Calbert Cheaney. Down 50-34, it
looked bleak for Iowa, but they scored 6 straight and gradually
whittled the lead down to 65-64 with only 4:25 left. Val Barnes,
who with Acie Earl scored 19 points, hit a trey, and James Moses
followed with another hoop to give Iowa a 69-65 late. But, in the
final two minutes, the Hoosier defense stepped it up a bit, as the
Hawkeyes had trouble getting off shots and even travelled. Hoops by
Lyndon Jones and Chris Reynolds tied the game, but the missed free
throws by people like Cheaney, Reynolds, and Matt Nover prevented
the Hoosiers from winning in regulation. IU did start finding the
mark in OT, taking a 77-74 lead with two minutes to go on the
strength of five FTs from Nover and Cheaney. But, Hawkeye
sharpshooter Troy Skinner drew two fouls, and nailed all four
freebies (he's almost a 90% shooter). With Iowa up one at 78-77,
Cheaney was fouled on a drive and sank two more FTs to put the
Hoosiers back up with 30+ seconds left. Iowa held the ball until
only 8 seconds were left, and called a timeout (I thought they
waited too long). A difficult inbounds pass was caught by Earl, who
dribbled a couple of times and launched a J from well beyond his
range. It clanged off the rim right to Chris Street, who missed a
bunny putback. But, James Moses was right there to tip in the
botched Street attempt, and the horn sounded to much jubilation on
the Iowa bench. Iowa had a ten board advantage over IU at the end
of regulation, and the Hawks dominated the glass on that last
sequence. Cheaney scored 26 for IU, while Lyndon Jones tied a
career-high with 21. Strangely, Damon Bailey was scoreless and got
in alot of pine-time last night. Over 17,000 very disappointed fans
in Bloomington...
#62 MICHIGAN 65, #43 Wisconsin 62: The Badgers blew a big chance to
take a positive step towards making the tournament, as Michael
Talley scored Michigan's last six points in sparking them to victory
in the game's final minute. Wisconsin had the ball and a 60-59 lead
with 1:12 left (erasing an 11-point second half Michigan lead), when
John Ellenson was called for a 5-second violation. Talley then hit
a jumper with :54 left to give Michigan a 61-60 lead it would not
relinquish. Talley hit four FTs thereafter to clinch it. Wisconsin
has not won at Crisler since 1982, and even that win was later
forfeited. The previous win there was in 1979. Demetrius Calip had
16 points for Michigan and Talley had 14. Ellenson, Willie Simms
and Patrick Tompkins each had 15 for Wisconsin...
|
15.230 | Big Ten Saturday and Sunday | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Feb 25 1991 16:49 | 171 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-25-91) NCAA
Date: 25 Feb 91 20:49:31 GMT
Clem Haskins was publically reprimanded by Gopher AD Rick Bay for his
outburst to the media following Minnesota's heartbreaking loss at Ohio
State, while Iowa center Acie Earl was charged with simple assault
Sunday after an altercation with an ex-girl friend following the loss to
Illinois. On the brighter side, Gene Keady and Jud Heathcote, two
beloved coaches in Illinois, looked like old pals after MSU's win in
East Lansing, and Lou Henson and Tom Davis shook hands before the game
Saturday as the hatchet was buried just a little...
Saturday's Results:
#45 MICHIGAN STATE 75, #42 Purdue 58: The Spartans played a great
second half and blew open what had been a close game. Steve Smith
and mates got off to a quick start, jumping out to a 14-7 lead, but
then Purdue put on some defense and held the Spartans in check the
rest of the first half, taking a 30-28 lead to the break. However,
Purdue's offensive woes rejoined them in the second half, and State
quickly seized control of the game. Dewayne Stephens, who often
doesn't do much but has been a royal pain in Purdue's ass the past
two seasons, led the second half charge with 14 points. Stephens
said, "The coach told me to shoot the ball more today, so I did and I
hit the shots. Once I started scoring, the guys kept getting me the
ball." MSU began the second half with something like a 17-6 run and
just kept it going, though Jud Heathcote said, "The score makes this
look like an easy win, but it wasn't. We put a lot of defensive
pressure on the ball in the second half, we dove for loose balls,
and we scored on the break." Purdue had a chance to do some damage
after Mike Peplowski picked up his fourth foul and the lead was
still only around 5 points. But, Craig Riley had a lousy game
inside for Purdue, and that was it. Jimmy Oliver was only 6 of 18
from the floor, though he led Purdue in scoring with 18 points. The
difference in this game was shooting, as the Spartans made 8 more
field goals than Purdue in one less attempt. MSU had a lot to do
with Purdue's shot selection, however. Steve Smith had 24 for
MSU before 15,138 at the Breslin Center...
#5 OHIO STATE 63, #87 Minnesota 62: Clem Haskins cried foul, but
to no avail, as the Gophers played a sensational first half and
almost pulled the unthinkable. Minnesota beat the Buckeyes at their
own game in that first half, scoring at least ten buckets on fast
breaks after Buckeye missfires or when the press was broken. The
Gophers led 40-33 at the break, and still led 58-51 with just 6:07
left when Clem Haskins was given a T. It was prompted when Jim
Jackson stole the ball and went out of bounds with it. Official
Steve Welmer mistakenly gave possession to OSU, and Haskins charged
the floor (to midcourt) and was given the T by Ted Hilliary before
official London Bradley could correct Welmer's call (typical B.S.
officiating in this conference). In rare postgame words from an
official, Hilliary said, "London had it the other way. He was
coming in to correct the call. It was going to be Minnesota's ball.
Clem was out of his coach's box and, I felt, in an unsportsmanlike
fashion." Jackson hit the two T free throws, which began an 8-0
Buckeye run to make the score 59-58 with 3:13 left. The Gophers
regained their composure and scored the next four points, all by
Randy Carter, a good-looking freshman, to lead 62-59 with 1:44 to
go. Jackson hit another shot to cut the gap to 62-61 with 1:21
left. Ariel McDonald was then hit with a five-second violation with
:46 to go, and Jamaal Brown drained a 15-footer with :32 left to
make the score 63-62. McDonald later drove the basket with :07 left
and shot over Jackson. The ball missed it's target and was tipped
towards the out-of-bounds. But, Chris Jent got to it and heaved it
into the backcourt and out-of-bounds, leaving just one second left.
Bob Martin's 15-footer clanged off the back of the rim to end the
game. Haskins said, "We really played well and we really won the
game. We beat the number two team in basketball and, unfortunately,
the headlines tomorrow are going to show that we lost the game. But
the Gophers won the game by one point to seven points if we don't
get the big-time screws put to us at the end. Any time you play
like we did tonight and don't come up with a win, it's really,
really tough in coaching. Because you do everything and then you
get out there and they call a game like that. And you get three
jackasses and it really, really hurts your players. Those three
guys today were a disgrace to basketball in the Big Ten." On Sunday
he said, "I accept and understand the public reprimand. But I'm
still disappointed, not for Clem Haskins, but for this group of
young men who played so hard and so well yesterday." I think Clem
learned his lessons well from Gene Keady when they were at Western
Kentucky together... Jackson scored 26 points while Kevin Lynch had
14 for the Gophers. 13,276 in Columbus...
#36 Illinois 79, #50 IOWA 74: Another strange home game for the
Hawkeyes, but of the more emotional variety due to the happenings of
the past year or so. It's remarkable that this team could sandwich
the Indiana road win with awful home offensive performances (and
losses) to Wisconsin and Illinois. Against Wisconsin a week ago
Saturday, the Hawkeyes could only muster 35 points in the game's
first 34 minutes, then lost on a trey at the horn 56-55. This time,
after getting out to an early 17-10 lead, Iowa went into it's funk,
getting outscored 15-4 over the next 10 minutes to trail 25-21.
Tehy managed to get the score knotted at 29 at intermission.
Illinois, on the heels of 56% shooting, then took the game over,
running out to leads of 38-33, 44-38 and 61-45, the latter with just
over seven minutes to go. The lead was still 71-56 Illinois with
4:48 left when the Hawkeyes began to go wild from three-point land,
led by James Moses, who scored 20 in the final minutes. He pulled
Iowa to within 76-74 with :35 to go. By this time, the Illini were
helping the Iowa cause by bricking free throw attempts and failing
to guard the perimeter, though a couple of Moses' bombs would have
made Larry Bird proud. Rennie Clemons hit a free throw with :18
left to give Illinois a 77-74 lead, as Moses fouled out. He missed
the second attempt, though, and Brooks Taylor rebounded and was
fouled. He promptly bricked both attempts, and Iowa had a chance to
tie. But, Clemons stripped Val Barnes of the ball, and Larry Smith
dropped two freebies with :05 left to end the scoring. Iowa, which
had outrebounded Indiana by 10 the other night, was licked on the
boards 41-26. Andy Kaufmann scored 32 points as he hit 9 of 10
shots in the second half, one a baseline bankshot which defied
physics. Moses scored 30, which may have been a career-high, and
Acie Earl had 21. 15,500 loud but disappointed fans at Carver-
Hawkeye, whom Moses later praised "because the Illinois fans were
very rude to us in Champaign...and the players really have no
knowledge of that controversy", referring to the Deon Thomas/Bruce
Pearl incident. Iowa didn't arrive in Iowa City until 5:30 am on
Friday after the IU win, as the team plane was forced down in Peoria
due to mechanical problems. That should have been an omen...
Sunday's Results:
#43 WISCONSIN 79, #216 Northwestern 76: Once again, the Wildcats
appeared to have victory in their grasp, only to see it again slip
away before a surprised Wisconsin Fieldhouse crowd of 10,042. You
really have to hand it to Northwestern for fighting so hard late in
this awful season. The Wildcats expanded a 42-40 halftime lead to
61-52 with just 11:53 to play. Wisconsin then put on it's surge to
gain a 68-65 lead. The game then see-sawed until the Badgers went
ahead to stay 76-74 with only :57 left on a Willie Simms hoop as the
shot clock was expiring. A foul on NU's Don Brotz with :25 left
allowed Wisconsin to help seal the victory. Bill Foster was
critical of the officiating, saying, "I know what Clem Haskins felt.
You can fill in the blanks." Pat Tompkins led Wisconsin with 18
points, while Charles Howell had 20 for NU...
#3 INDIANA 112, #62 Michigan 79: Indiana decided to blow off the
steam of two straight losses by routing the Wolverines yesterday.
This was the highest scoring output of the season for IU in a win
more reminiscent of those in January than lately. The Michigan
guards, who do the bulk of the scoring, got out of the blocks
slowly, and IU was able to pull away from a 32-28 advantage to lead
48-35 at the intermission. The Hoosiers poured it on most of the
second half, as even Pat Knight played. Four Hoosiers made double
figures in scoring, led by Calbert Cheaney's 30. Demetrius Calip
eventually scored 28 after I believe only having 4 points at
halftime. IU outscored the Wolverines by 21 from the stripe.
Michigan did win the battle of the boards 40-35, before 16,285 in
Bloomington...
Tonight:
#45 Michigan State at #87 MINNESOTA 8:30 pm CST ESPN
RATINGS/RECORDS (old ratings):
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
5 2 2 2 Ohio State 14-1 24-1 24-1
3 4 4 4 Indiana 11-3 23-4 23-4
36 30 35 NR Illinois 9-5 19-8 18-8
45 37 40 NR Michigan State 9-5 16-8 16-8
43 NR 45 NR Wisconsin 7-7 13-11 12-10
50 NR 50 NR Iowa 7-8 18-9 16-9
62 NR NR NR Michigan 6-9 13-12 13-12
42 NR NR NR Purdue 5-9 13-11 13-11
87 NR NR NR Minnesota 3-10 10-13 10-13
216 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-14 5-19 3-19
|
15.231 | last night.... | FORTSC::MOK | | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:28 | 63 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-26-91) NCAA
Date: 26 Feb 91 16:03:55 GMT
Monday's Result:
#45 Michigan State 76, #87 MINNESOTA 74: The Spartans played great
for about 30 minutes, then some terrible ballhandling and passing
almost let a victory slip away. Steve Smith was particularly sloppy
down the stretch. He appears to be developing a big-time attitude,
I'm afraid. The Spartans were ahead 62-46 when the Gophers began to
chip away with some nice shooting (mostly not from Kevin Lynch,
though he did have a couple). It was 64-53, and before you knew it,
the lead was down to three on a couple of occasions within the final
couple of minutes. Lynch hit a major league bomb at the final horn
for the final margin of two, a banker, no less. Nate Tubbs, from my
high school, had a huge hand in the Gophers' late run, making a
couple of treys and some other nice shots. He's turning into a good
player. Mike Peplowski fouled out, as the Spartans lost both of
their inside people to fouls down the stretch. Kind of a sedate
crowd at The Barn, as Minnesota must now win the rest of it's games
in order to finish at .500. This will not be easy, with road trips
to Columbus and Bloomington left. What's with Mark Montgomery's
long passes against the press? He either threw it over a teammates
head out of bounds or into a Gophers hands. Not a very good job by
MSU down the stretch. This kind of breakdown in the tournament will
translate into a quick exit...
Thursday:
#3 Indiana at #45 MICHIGAN STATE 6:00 pm ESPN (last one)
#62 Michigan at #36 ILLINOIS 7:00 pm
#216 Northwestern at #87 MINNESOTA 7:00 pm
#43 Wisconsin at #42 PURDUE 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#3 Indiana at #43 WISCONSIN Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#36 Illinois at #216 NORTHWESTERN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#42 Purdue at #50 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#45 Michigan State at #5 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC
#87 Minnesota at #62 MICHIGAN 3:00 pm ABC
RATINGS/RECORDS:
New New
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
5 2 2 2 Ohio State 14-1 24-1 24-1
3 5 5 4 Indiana 11-3 23-4 23-4
45 35 ?? NR Michigan State 10-5 17-8 17-8
36 30 NR NR Illinois 9-5 19-8 18-8
43 NR NR NR Wisconsin 7-7 13-11 12-10
50 37 ?? NR Iowa 7-8 18-9 16-9
62 NR NR NR Michigan 6-9 13-12 13-12
42 NR NR NR Purdue 5-9 13-11 13-11
87 NR NR NR Minnesota 3-11 10-14 10-14
216 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-14 5-19 3-19
|
15.232 | | SACT41::ROSS | Oh no, thirtysomething soon! | Tue Feb 26 1991 13:58 | 9 |
| A major gripe.. If I were in charge of negotiating the Big 10's contract with
ESPN, I would give them the following ultimatum:
Either we flip-flop every other week on who leads off on Big Monday,
or else we'll take our games elsewhere.
It's ridiculous to have to watch the Big East games run over EVERY SINGLE
WEEK past the 9:30 time slot. Half the Big 10 teams are in the same
time zone as the Big East.
|
15.233 | I'd like to see them change it too... | CHIEFF::CHILDS | this house sure gone crazy | Tue Feb 26 1991 14:25 | 7 |
|
Blame the big east refs Doug they're whistle happy. It was better when they
only had 5 fouls to give the refs were a bit more forgiving...
I saw a replay of the call and I'd say Clem had a right to bitch...
mike
|
15.234 | another Big 10 scandal | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Feb 27 1991 09:22 | 11 |
| Yo Cap, better get over here!
Acie Earl, Iowa sophomore, has pleaded guilty to the assault of a
17-year-old girl. Acie remains on the team but apparently his punishment
is that he can't start.
Tough stand there, Iowa. Much more severe than the famed King Rice event.
I guess King had a better lawyer: no assault charge and still starting.
It's easy to see the moral fiber of the Big10. Not.
TTom
|
15.235 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Feb 27 1991 11:11 | 25 |
| Ttom,
Barking up the wrong tree here son.... Personally I don't give a rat's
ass what happens at Iowa. I'm a Indiana fan not an Iowa fan. The King
Rice affair raised my gander because of the hypocritical treatment that
King Rice was given by Dean Smith and the upstanding Carolina program.
It was embarrassing seeing Dean Smith bow to the pressure of winning by
failing to properly discipline a convicted criminal.
Acie Earl, BTW, is not starting. The girl(an old-time friend) dropped
the charges and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge(from
what I heard he just grabbed her arm in an arguement.) That's a little
different than choking a girl, resisting arrest, fighting with cops and
punching a hole in a cell wall all the while being blasted out of his
mind by alcohol or some other substance.
I don't care what happens at Iowa, but from what I read it's not a
serious situation.
Cap
P.S. Of course it's not even close to being as serious as shaving
points on the behalf of some organized crime figure. What
school was alledged to have done that????? :-)
|
15.236 | clear now | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:45 | 11 |
| Acie, unlike the object of your focus King, was convicted of assault on a
girl. Very much like King, he received little or not punishment from the
school or team.
You're right, Cap, wrong tree. I mistook your previous notes as an
indication of your interest in this type of injustice. I understand now
that you merely have a hardon for Dean Smith and aren't interested in
anything like "hypocritical treatment", "failing to properly discipline"
and the like. It will help all of us interpret your future notes.
TTom
|
15.237 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:09 | 31 |
| No TTom,
Simple assault is a misdemeanor, no battery was involved which means no
physical harm was committed to the girl in question. There was only
a threat or presumed threat, stemming from an argument.(Acie Earl
situation)
Felonious Assault and battery is a felony in which physical harm was
committed. This is what happened in the King Rice affair.
There is a huge difference between the two. If Acie Earl had committed
the latter and still remained on the team, I would remain the same.
Anyone who is involved in a heated argument with another person runs
the risk of being charged with simple assault.
Get your facts straight before you go on an unwarranted attack. As
much as I like to rag on Dean Smith, the King Rice/Smith situation was
completely wrong and an embarrassment to the university and college
basketball and it would have been wrong at any school, Indiana
included. The Acie Earl situation is not even close to being the same
situation.
Before you go out trying to assume my motives in a situation, why don't
you think before you try to analyze me personally?
Better start using the ol' noggin before trying to compare to
situations that are different as night and day....
Cap
|
15.238 | | SACT41::ROSS | Oh no, thirtysomething soon! | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:19 | 10 |
| >Very much like King, he received little or not punishment from the
>school or team.
Acie got "little", King got "none".... unless we count those extra laps
he had to run after practice. :-)
>I understand now
>that you merely have a hardon for Dean Smith
Mine's bigger.
|
15.239 | next | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:23 | 6 |
| > ... As
> much as I like to rag on Dean Smith,
Q.E.D.
TTom
|
15.240 | Next | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Feb 27 1991 13:46 | 11 |
|
TTom,
HA! Your response reminded me a little of Saddam Hussein. Get your
butt kicked(in an argument) but try and extract a little quote and make
it into a tiny victory.
Oh well, try again sometime, but this time do a little research so that
you're not embarrassed by the actual facts.
Cap :-)
|
15.241 | ass, butt; what's next? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu Feb 28 1991 08:31 | 24 |
| Cap,
Let's do a quick review:
1. I baited you.
2. You stated the case that while King and Acie were both convicted of
assault,
> ... The King
> Rice affair raised my gander because of the hypocritical treatment that
> King Rice was given by Dean Smith and the upstanding Carolina program.
I didn't - never, don't, won't - dispute either your description of your
reaction to the King Affair or your characterization of the King Affair.
3. This is pure gravy!
> ... Personally I don't give a rat's
> ass what happens at Iowa.
Go Big 10. ;-)
TTom
|
15.242 | | CAM::WAY | When Nick returns: Mother of all Parties | Thu Feb 28 1991 08:32 | 4 |
| �� -< ass, butt; what's next? >-
Private parts?
|
15.243 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Thu Feb 28 1991 11:03 | 17 |
| TTom,
You didn't bait me with the Acie Earl situation, you baited me with an
underhanded personal stab. King and Acie's(good poker hand) situation
are on different ends of the spectrum and you looked foolish trying to
compare the two.
I don't care if you want to rag on the Big10. Nothing pleased me more
than Illinois get caught with their hand in the cookie jar and would
feel the same about any Big10 team or player that breaks the rules and
is not justly punished.
I just thought that with all the criminal-atheletes that have passed
through NC State that you'd know the difference between Simple Assault
and Assault and Battery. :-) (many smilies)
Cap
|
15.244 | | SACT41::ROSS | Some people call me Maurice...whoowoo | Thu Feb 28 1991 14:25 | 9 |
| Another BIG night in college hoop:
Indiana at Michigan State 7:00 ESPN
and Tar Heels at Georgia Tech 9:00 ESPN
Look for an easier-than-expected IU win {say, 84-72} as Bobby tunes up the
team for the tournament.
|
15.245 | a fan | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu Feb 28 1991 16:23 | 5 |
| Actually, Cap, I'm a fan of the Big 10. My sister went to Purdue and my
brother went to Northwestern. Lots of friends who went to some of the
others.
TTom
|
15.246 | dot dot dot | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Feb 28 1991 17:18 | 15 |
| HUGE game for the Hoosiers, they need to win the rest in order to
stay as overrated as possible so as to get the best seed and there-
fore the weakest opponents... Michigan's recruiting class is shaping
up as maybe the best ever... Apparently Poploski's knee is acting up
again and that's why the poor play... MrT is going to Mad City for
the second toughie of the week for the poor Hoosiers... Rumor has
Gene Keady leaving Purdue for the UNLV job (one ugly coach for
another)... If Yoder don't git his boys into the NCAAs he could be
toast... Clem Haskins' recruiting isn't shaping up as too good, he
and Rick Bay aren't getting along, he may split Minnesota for a worse
job... Dr. Tom Davis has been nominated by technical analysts for the
much coveted Dean Smith Coaching Incompetence Cup (a spitoon of the
type used by choking patients in dentist offices)...
Big10 Tom
|
15.247 | Games last night | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Mar 01 1991 18:23 | 145 |
| Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-1-91) NCAA
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1991 20:13:05 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#4 Indiana 62, #35 MICHIGAN STATE 56: The Hoosiers got off to a
great start, then had to fend off the Spartans in Steve Smith's
final home game. Fend off maybe isn't the right term. IU only
could make two of it's final 16 field goal attempts in this game (!)
spanning the last 15:51, and still won! That's because the Spartans
could only make 10 of 30 the entire second half! Yet, the Spartans
still could have won this game. Eric Anderson was only 5 of 13.
Smith could only hit 9 of 22. Matt Steigenga ripped the cords for
17 first half points, but went scoreless in the second half. Both
coaches blamed poor officiating on their team's second half woes.
"Three or four of those shots were Damon Bailey under the basket
where he was fouled every time. I thought it was Cubans cutting
down banana stalks.", is how Bob Knight put it after the game. Jud
Heathcote added, "I know Steve Smith got butchered a couple of times
on drives, and they (the officials) just looked at him. I'm not
questioning the officiating [right!]. But in a defensive game like
this, if you get some of those calls it can make a difference." IU
got off to something like a 10-0 start, and then State spent the
rest of the first half catching up. They did, though, as the score
was knotted at 33 at the break. Calbert Cheaney hit his first three
shots but was then shut out the rest of the half by Dwayne Stephens.
During the first 4:09 of the second half, the Hoosiers reestablished
their lead at 43-35 as Cheaney hit three more shots. That was it
for him in the game. MSU closed to 43-41 around the eight minute
mark. Matt Nover hit a short J to give his team a 45-41 lead, but
IU relied on some better free throw shooting down the stretch to win
the game. The Hoosiers had another 6-point lead at 52-46 before the
end. Cheaney had 18 points and Anderson 10 as the only IU in double
figures. Smith had 19 in his Breslin Center finale, and with
Steigenga's 17 were the only Spartans in double figures. Smith had
a lousy game, as he was brilliant one moment and then forcing
something awful the next. Knight said, "The most satisfying thing
was when we had to win, we did. We hung on." Jud added, "...In
these kinds of games it's hard to single out anyone who had a great
game. These kinds of games just don't look good." 15,138 on hand,
hoping the Spartans fare better the rest of the way at Ohio State
and at Michigan...
#32 ILLINOIS 68, #68 Michigan 65: Illinois won another one "ugly"
(as the Chicago Tribune put it), overcoming a horrendous first half
of shooting to overtake the Wolverines in the game's final 15
minutes. The Illini couldn't shoot from the field in the first
half, they couldn't shoot from the line at all, and generally looked
disorganized all night. Yet, they won. Michigan was only 22-56
from the floor themselves, so that helped. The Wolverines did get
off to a good start, though, and led at halftime 34-29, though
they could have and should have led by much more.
Michigan still led 40-31 5:24 into the second half when the Illini
went on a 28-11 run, making nine straight shots, including a bank
shot from three-point land from Rennie Clemons, who hasn't shot much
from out there this year. The lead remained at 8 with just 1:59 to
go when the Illini tried to "purdue" one away. Demetrius Calip and
Michael Talley combined for three treys to draw Michigan within
65-64 with just 24 seconds left. Andy Kaufmann then bricked two
free throws (he once hit 32 consecutive this season), but the Illini
rebounded after the second miss and Kaufmann hit one of two for a
66-64 lead with :15 left. Calip then hit one free throw with 6
seconds left for a 66-65 score. Kaufmann was quickly fouled, and
he made the first one for a 67-65 lead. He missed the second, but
somehow the Illini picked up the loose ball and Andy was given
another reprieve. He again hit the first shot for a 68-65 lead, and
again missed the second. Michigan appeared to rebound this one, but
a bad pass allowed the Illini to steal the ball and the final two
ticks mercifully expired. Eric Riley scored 13 in the first half
for Michigan, but only four in the second half as Andy Kpedi held
him in check. Calip had 16 points, but was only 6 of 17 from the
floor. Kaufmann had 18 for Illinois, but was just 5 of 15 from the
floor and 8 of 14 from the stripe. Clemons and Larry Smith each
had 14. The Illini, at 44%, ended up outshooting Michigan. 14,584
at the Assembly Hall...
#75 MINNESOTA 88, #209 Northwestern 70: The Mildcats lost their 15th
conference game in as many tries as the Gophers finally won a home
game themselves. The current losing streak of 16 games for NU is
it's longest in 67 years. The loss marked the 45th straight on the
Big Ten road for them as well. The Gophers were a bit off too,
blowing a 15-point first half lead as the Cats closed to one at the
buzzer, 38-37. NU then took an early second half lead of 40-38
before Minnesota turned the tables. One stretch saw the Gophers
extend a 43-42 lead to 55-42. Northwestern then cut the lead to six
at 63-57 before falling apart in the game's final 6 minutes, as the
Gophers went on a 25-13 tear. Kevin Lynch led the Gophers in
scoring with 22 points, and Ernest Nzigamasabo (we haven't called
his name much this season - "Zig-uh-muh-za-bo") had 21 in perhaps
his best game so far. Pat Baldwin was 10 of 11 from the field and
led NU with 23 points. 14,597 at Minneapolis...
#47 PURDUE 69, #54 Wisconsin 62: Purdue overcame a late first half
8-point deficit, and then held off the Badgers in a tight ballgame
at Mackey Arena. The Boilers got off to another sluggish offensive
start against Wisconsin, sort of like the first game in Madison.
From a 7-7 tie the Badgers jumped out to a 15-9 lead. The lead
remained around five points until it was extended to 27-19 with
under five minutes to go in the half. Purdue then went on it's best
run of the game, outscoring Wisconsin 11-2 the rest of the half in
taking a 30-29 lead to the break. The second half remained close.
It was 50-48 Purdue under the 12 minute mark when the Badgers took a
couple of small leads, the biggest being of I believe three points.
The game was retied at 57 with just over two minutes left when
Purdue took command. The Boilers went ahead 60-57, and after the
Badgers closed to one, Jimmy Oliver hit a trey as the shot clock was
expiring for a 63-59 lead. Willie Simms had a three-footer
rejected by Chuckie White when the Badgers had a chance to tie the
game at 63. Purdue finally got the lead above four in the
final :30 by hitting some free throws, and the Badgers were unable
to free Tim Locum for any threes. The others attempted were
missed. The Badgers shot well from the stripe while the Boilers
labored. White had several big baskets inside down the stretch, as
the Boilers did a good job on Patrick Tompkins again. 14,123 on
hand for the students' final home game of the season...
Saturday:
#4 Indiana at #54 WISCONSIN Noon CST Big Ten/Raycom
#32 Illinois at #209 NORTHWESTERN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#47 Purdue at #43 IOWA 7:00 pm
Sunday:
#35 Michigan State at #6 OHIO STATE 1:00 pm ABC (national?)
#75 Minnesota at #68 MICHIGAN 3:00 pm ABC (regional?)
RATINGS/RECORDS:
New New New New
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
6 2 2 2 Ohio State 14-1 24-1 24-1
4 5 5 7 Indiana 12-3 24-4 24-4
32 30 NR NR Illinois 10-5 20-8 19-8
35 35 ?? NR Michigan State 10-6 17-9 17-9
43 37 ?? NR Iowa 7-8 18-9 16-9
54 NR NR NR Wisconsin 7-8 13-12 12-11
47 NR NR NR Purdue 6-9 14-11 14-11
68 NR NR NR Michigan 6-10 13-13 13-13
75 NR NR NR Minnesota 4-11 11-14 11-14
209 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-15 5-20 3-20
|
15.248 | oh those helpful handy REFS
| AGNT99::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Mon Mar 04 1991 09:54 | 5 |
|
Second time in a few weeks that the refs had the say in an OSU victory. I
think it's a conspiracy to keep a #1 ranking for a Big Ten team in the
Midwest Regionals. Shameful call yesterday considering the wide open play
of the rest of the game. Shades of Seton Hall/Michigan....
|
15.249 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Mar 04 1991 11:50 | 8 |
| Third time. Don't forget Perry Carter carrying the ball atop his
manly shoulder after stealing the ball from Calbert as the clock
ticked down to zero. True, Indiana didn't deserve to win anyway.
The most egregious of the three certainly would be the Minneosta
call that led to the now infamous "three jackasses" vituperations from
Clem.
Big10 Tom
|
15.250 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Mon Mar 04 1991 12:47 | 5 |
|
Agreed the 5 second call was the most bogus. What did ole Clem say? All
I got to hear or read back here in the NECCJ (tm) was that he got reprimanded.
mike
|
15.251 | Big Ten last Sat and Sun | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Mar 04 1991 18:52 | 181 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-4-91) NCAA
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1991 21:10:01 GMT
The Buckeyes clinched at least a tie for the Big Ten title yesterday,
their first since 1971 (Luke Witte, Alan Hornyak, etc.). It wasn't
easy, though. Indiana continued it's surge after the Iowa loss with a
second straight big road win. Illinois just about nailed down third
place for the year, Purdue kept alive it's NCAA hopes with a stunning
comeback at Iowa, and Michigan probably iced an NIT berth. Minnesota
was eliminated from postseason play. Wisconsin dropped another game and
further jeopardized it's post-season aspirations (NIT at best now).
Michigan State lost yet another heartbreak to an excellent team...
Saturday:
#4 Indiana 74, #54 WISCONSIN 61: The Badgers led by three at the
break, but IU's superior execution in the last ten minutes of the
game made it look easy at the end. The Badgers tight defense (most
of the time) held the Hoosiers to just 23 first half points.
Calbert Cheaney himself scored more than that in the second half,
24, as Bob Knight switched to a 1-3-1 offense in the final 20
minutes and watched his team blister Wisconsin for 51 points. The
final five minutes were vintage Indiana, as, with the game still
very much in doubt, the Hoosiers time-and-again worked for great,
easy shots and made them. Steve Yoder called Cheaney "by far the
best player in the Big Ten". Knight summed it up well: "Wisconsin
seems to be starcrossed. They've played well but come up a bit
short. But with the fan support they've had, they could be very
tough in the NIT". Eric Anderson chipped in with 11 points, while
Greg Graham looked very quick in getting 10. Cheaney ended up with
30 points. Willie Simms had 22 for Wisconsin, and Tim Locum 13,
all in the first half (I don't think that's the first time that's
happened). Another great road victory for the Hoosiers, who could
have gone into the dumper after the home loss to Iowa. 11,924
filled the old UW Fieldhouse...
#32 Illinois 91, #209 NORTHWESTERN 81: The Illini shot 59% to fend
off the pesky Wildcats, who are playing pretty well despite their
awful record. Actually, the final score is probably a bit
misleading, as Sweet Lou put in the walkons. Uncharacteristically
for this season, both teams shot well over 50% (Illinois was 59.6
while NU was 55.6). The Illini pulled away late in the first half
for a six-point lead at 40-34. The Wildcats had hung tough all
half. Illinois then surged ahead quickly in the second half,
building leads of 49-38 and 64-48. The Illini hit 18 of their first
24 second half shots. Many aspects of the game were quite even, as
Northwestern didn't embarrass themselves. Larry Smith scored a
game-high 26 points, 12 of them coming from the stripe. Andy
Kaufmann had 21 on 10-15 shooting. Don Brotz had 22 points for NU.
Kevin Rankin had 15. A sellout crowd of 8,117 saw this game at
Welsh-Ryan Arena...
#47 Purdue 70, #43 IOWA 65: Purdue staged a tremendous comeback in
the game's final 7:56, outscoring Iowa 21-4 to grab a huge victory.
The players had dedicated the game to Gene Keady, who's mother had
passed away either Thursday night or Friday. Keady also got the
heave-ho, earning two technicals (he looked grouchy from the opening
tipoff). The first one came only about two minutes into the game,
as Tom Rucker whistled him after calling Matt Painter for one of
those touch fouls. The second one came about 5 or so minutes into
the second half after another call Gene didn't like. The Purdue
radio announcer commented, "Gene's over-reacting again". Iowa
really didn't cash in on either T, though. One of Jimmy Oliver's
patented, angled, bank-in trifectas won this game in the final 20
seconds (believe it or not, Iowa fans, he's made that shot at other
times this year). The first half was pretty interesting, and
high-scoring, as Troy Skinner drilled a bomb at the horn to tie the
game at 38 heading into the lockerroom. Purdue had started quickly,
as Acie Earl sat, and led 18-13 when he entered. Iowa then went on
an 11-2 run, going ahead 24-20, much to the delight of the loud
Carver-Hawkeye sellout. Purdue then regained a 36-31 lead just
before halftime and another Iowa surge. Purdue scored the first
hoop of the second half, 40-38, then didn't score again until about
another six minutes elapsed, as the Hawkeyes led 49-40. The teams
traded baskets, then, over the next 6 minutes, until Iowa took a
61-49 lead, with 7:59 left. Purdue, over the next 5+ minutes,
scored 11 straight points to close to 61-60. During this stretch
the Hawkeye offense broke down, either missing shots or committing
turnovers. Even with this help, Purdue blew four consecutive
chances to overtake the Hawkeyes, including two bricks at the line
from master bricklayer Chuckie White. Val Barnes finally broke the
ice for Iowa to give them a 63-60 lead and seemingly the kick in the
pants the team needed. But, that's when Oliver woke up, as he
bombed in a three to tie the game at 63 late. Earl then missed a
pretty short one, leading to Oliver's bank-in three and a 66-63
Purdue lead, this with only about 20 seconds left. Iowa then missed
it's own three, and Craig Riley nailed two freebies after a foul.
After an Earl dunk, White finally hit a couple of FTs to close out
the scoring. Oliver led Purdue in scoring with 21 points, Ian
Stanback had 15 in a very good performance, and Riley and Linc
Darner had 11 each. Barnes led Iowa with 14 points. Earl and
Skinner had 12 each. Iowa's play noticibly drops when Earl is on
the bench. The officiating in this game was interesting as well, as
the Hawkeyes were allowed their style of board crashing and back
climbing, in addition to the Keady kickout. There was also a
phantom whistle on Acie Earl, called by Tom Rucker, as Earl was
demonstrating to another ref a move Riley had just made. The groan
of the Iowa crowd when Oliver dropped in his 25-footer was
incredible...
Sunday:
#6 OHIO STATE 65, #35 Michigan State 64: The Buckeyes continue to
live dangerously, as the Spartans gave it all they had before
falling on a foul shot. OSU seemingly put this game away around the
two minute mark, leading 64-57. One of the definitive hoops in the
OSU surge was a steal after a bad Andy Pennick pass and subsequent
dunk. The Buckeyes must have thought the game ended then, though,
as Matt Steigenga (wasn't Keith and Dick's argument over the
pronunciation of his name silly?) hit a beautiful three to tie the
game at 64 with :39 still left. The Buckeyes got a good shot from
Jamaal Brown with :05 left, but he sent it in hard and it came right
back to him. Pretty much in one motion, he rebounded and re-shot,
as Steve Smith tapped his shooting elbow. The whistle blew as Brown
went down hard, and after bricking the first FT, he rattled in the
second to win the game. The oft-mentioned refs' convention around
the scorer's table preceded the FT's, though, as one second was put
back on the clock. The ensuing MSU inbounds was thrown clean over
the opposite end line, so OSU got to inbound under it's own hoop to
end the game. Smith had 23 to lead the Spartans, but he was only 9
of 25 from the floor and never drew a foul while shooting (he never
went to the line at all). He also was careless at times. Steigenga
and Dewayne Stephens played solid games. Neither team shot very
well, but it was an interesting game, as MSU led a good deal of it,
including 33-32 at halftime. Jim Jackson had 20 for the Buckeyes.
13,276 worn-out fans at Columbus...
#68 MICHIGAN 68, #75 Minnesota 60: Michigan really played well
yesterday and ensured a losing season for the Gophers. UM won
this game in the first half, sprinting out to a 39-27 lead at the
break. Demetrius Calip hit 5 threes in the game, and scored 29
points. He's really had a fine season for Michigan and should cop a
few post-season accolades (he was a key player filling in for
overrated Sean Higgins two years ago during Michigan's glory run).
The Gophers had a balanced attack, but they just couldn't keep up.
Dana Jackson had 14 for this basically young team, one which will get
much better soon. Michigan is probably a lock for the NIT now, but
a win against Michigan State next Saturday would ice it. 10,485
at Crisler Arena...
Wednesday:
#6 Ohio State at #47 PURDUE 7:00 pm CST
#32 Illinois at #54 WISCONSIN 7:00 pm
Thursday:
#75 Minnesota at #4 INDIANA 7:00 pm
#43 Iowa at #209 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm
Saturday:
#54 Wisconsin at #75 MINNESOTA Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#35 Michigan State at #68 MICHIGAN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#209 Northwestern at #47 PURDUE 1:00 pm
Sunday:
#4 Indiana at #32 ILLINOIS 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
#6 Ohio State at #43 IOWA 1:00 pm ABC (regional)
[End of Regular Season]
RATINGS/RECORDS:
Old Old Old Old
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
6 2 2 2 Ohio State 15-1 25-1 25-1
4 5 5 7 Indiana 13-3 25-4 25-4
32 30 NR NR Illinois 11-5 21-8 20-8
35 35 ?? NR Michigan State 10-7 17-10 17-10
43 37 ?? NR Iowa 7-9 18-10 16-10
47 NR NR NR Purdue 7-9 15-11 15-11
54 NR NR NR Wisconsin 7-9 13-13 12-12
68 NR NR NR Michigan 7-10 14-13 14-13
75 NR NR NR Minnesota 4-12 11-15 11-15
209 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-16 5-21 3-21
|
15.252 | cain you thay, "unequivocal?" | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 05 1991 12:24 | 10 |
| >What did ole Clem say?
Paraphrasing from memory:
"It's a goddamned shame that these kids worked so hard and beat the
#2 team in the country on their home floor only to have the game
stolen from them by three jackasses wearing striped shirts. I don't
know what they were thinking, except to prevent Ohio State from losing.
If the Big10 and NCAA had any class, cared about fairness, they'd run
these three stupid jackasses out of college basketball for good."
|
15.253 | Another Ellenberger violation? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Tue Mar 05 1991 13:10 | 20 |
| Norm Ellenberger, currently a full-time assistant at Indiana, has been
cited for alleged improper recruiting contacts while at UTEP. The NCAA is
investigating their program, where Ellenberger was a part-time coach from
86-90. NCAA rules bar part time coaches from recruiting off campus. The
NCAA report made public accused UTEP and Ellenberger with 2 prospective
recruits.
This is Ellenberger's second confrontation with the NCAA. He was fired at
New Mexico in 1979 after a grade-fixing scandal at that school.
Bobby Knight can probably deflect this while the status is still at the
level of allegations. If proven to be true, the school would have no
choice but to fire him. Also, if true, the NCAA should act like they did
in the Kentucky scandal and bar Ellenberger for some period of coaching.
If they are proven to be inaccurate, Knight and Indiana should make that
clear, since some investigations just fade away and one is left with a
notice that the allegations were made and not much fanfare when the
investigations disprove them.
TTom
|
15.254 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Tue Mar 05 1991 15:16 | 18 |
| It sounds like another one of those petty-ass NCAA rules, it's a shame
the NCAA doesn't hit the real violaters hard but instead go after these
small violations.
i.e. The hotel stuff at UNLV, free sneakers at school's, Steve Alford
posing for a charity poster and a million other meaningless things.
This is not in defense of IU because no violations have occured there
but to go after a part-time coach who might have contacted a recruit
during a legal time-period. Hell I'd even complain if this happened at
North Carolina. It's a little different than shipping thousands of
dollars to the father of a prospective recruit(Kentucky violation).
It's about time for a separate orginazation outside the NCAA to begin
to investigate these rule violations and for the NCAA to get rid of
some of these petty rules.
Cap
|
15.255 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Mar 06 1991 11:56 | 23 |
| Bob & Indiana could care less about Ellenberger's problems at UTEP
cuz Bob brought him on with the explicit understanding that he'd done
wrong prior to showing up at IU.
Bob has a career history featuring two thrusting prongs: 1) He does
things geek PR freaks tend not to like, such as hiring a coach with
a troubled past, and, 2) he runs a_immaculate program, which is why
his teams never feature high-priced centers and widebodies.
If you care so much about rules violations write about UNLV, who
recruit kids with SATs of 550 and criminal records who also happen to
be great hoopsters no other univeristy (i.e., UCLA, Zona, etc.) cain
touch, and if they do well they're paid upwards of a $500,000 per year
and are illegally wired into mega real estate deals and retailing start
ups.
If the IRS investigated Tark, he'd not only not be coaching, he'd be
doing time in the federal penintentary.
Big diff between *scum* and giving a miscreant a second chance just to
spite the geek freeks.
Big10 Tom
|
15.256 | third chance? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed Mar 06 1991 16:39 | 15 |
| I get the point about hiring the coach with a "troubled past". I
especially like it this is directed at PR freaks.
I get the point about UNLV. I missed the leap from SATs and paying
players to Tark should have a problem with IRS. Are you saying that he
too is receiving illegal - undeclared - compensation? Now, I'm not saying
that he might be not somehow criminally involved with some of this but I
don't know and haven't heard details of a tax problem.
> Big diff between *scum* and giving a miscreant a second chance just to
> spite the geek freeks.
What if this is changed to third chance?
TTom
|
15.257 | | SACT41::ROSS | Some people call me Maurice...whoowoo | Thu Mar 07 1991 08:28 | 10 |
| Purdue beat Ohio State last night 72-67, which should cause all sorts of
problems for the NCAA committee. I can't prevent the cynical side of
me from thinking there's some sort of conspiracy going on to get as many
Big 10 schools into the tournament. Each team is worth $250K to the
league... Purdue was out of it completely two weeks ago.. now they're
a win away {Northwestern, I think} from a pretty decent shot at a slot
in the tournament.
Ohio State hasn't exactly been dominating lately... They had won several
very close games in a row. Hope they get things going again soon.
|
15.258 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | I was testing the bounds of reality | Thu Mar 07 1991 12:25 | 8 |
|
I was thinking the conspiracy had more to do with Keady's recent personal
tragedy. The again Doug they did blow the first game against OSU so maybe
it's just the kids are coming of age. They certainly look cool last night
at crunch time. The pass to White off the trap in the corner was a beauty.
Wish ESPN had covered more of it...
mike
|
15.259 | Yeah, Purdue! | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu Mar 07 1991 19:49 | 114 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-7-91) NCAA
Date: 7 Mar 91 19:57:22 GMT
Who says Steve Smith has "no help"? Did you know that Mark "Monty"
Montgomery leads the Big Ten in assists (he should, since Smith takes so
many shots) and is third in steals!!! Let's not hear anymore whining
out of East Lansing... ;-)
Wednesday's Results:
#39 PURDUE 72, #8 Ohio State 67: The Boilermakers boosted their
stock tremendously for NCAA tourney consideration as they led most
of this game and held the Buckeyes off down the stretch, before an
ear-shattering 14,123 at Mackey Arena. The keys to this game were
OSU shot selection (again), as Purdue outshot the Buckeyes 60% to
39% from the floor, and Matt Painter's defense against Jim Jackson.
Also, another tremendously inconsistent officiating job by the refs,
headed up by Ed Hightower. Purdue got the benefit of the doubt in
the first half, being whistled only 5 times to OSU's 11, but in the
second half, Purdue had already committed 10 fouls by the 10:10
mark, while OSU finally committed a 7th with 3:30 left. The
Boilers ended up with 15 in the second half to OSU's 10. Both
teams overcame these "consistencies" to put on a great show. I
understand ESPN picked up the final 1:30 of the game, so I hope you
got to see it. The teams traded hoops early, and then Purdue
assumed a lead after the score was tied at 15, as they led
20-15 after a couple of hoops by Chuckie White and Ian Stanback.
OSU tied it up at 22 on a Chris Jent trey, and after Mark Baker
tied the game again at 24, Purdue shot ahead 32-24 with 3:35 left in
the first half. The Buckeyes shaved the score to 32-31 with 1:22 to
go on a Jim Jackson trey. Baker hit two free throws with :04 left
to send the teams to a 35-33 Purdue advantage at the break. The
Boilers led all of the first 14 minutes of the second half, jumping
out to leads of 41-36 and 53-45, the latter with only 6:38 left.
Over the next few minutes, the only thing Purdue had to show for
itself was a White dunk. Ohio State, on the other hand, scored 11
points, and led 56-55. The game see-sawed for a couple of
possesions, and then Purdue went ahead and kept the lead. Jimmy
Oliver hit a huge three to give Purdue a 64-60 lead, and then the
Boilers went up 68-63 with 1:18 to go. Perry Carter then hit a free
throw and missed the second (way short), but Chris Jent snared
the board and whipped the ball to Jackson, who drained a three to
cut the lead to just one, 68-67, with 1:14 still left. Oliver
and Linc Darner iced the game with free throws down the stretch, as
Purdue held off the Buckeyes. The Buckeyes have now not won in West
Lafayette since 1985. Oliver had a great game, scoring 27 points
and hitting the big shots when they had to be hit. Chuckie White
celebrated his 23rd birthday with 21 points in an inspired second
half. Painter had 6 points and generally did one of the best jobs
of the year by a Purdue guard running the offense. The Boilers got
a bunch of good shots in this game. Jamaal Brown had a nice game
with 14 points, tying Jackson for team honors. Mark Baker had 11.
Treg Lee and Perry Carter combined for only 17 points, but both
helped OSU to a 36-25 rebound advantage, 28 of them in the second
half! I told Randy Ayers to "Beat Vegas" after the game. He smiled
nicely, as always...
#55 WISCONSIN 85, #33 Illinois 77: The Badgers kept their
tournament hopes alive as well by holding off the Illini after
dominating most of the evening. Or, as the Chicago Tribune put it
this morning, "Illini turn sour up in Dairyland". Four senior
starters were honored in the final home game at the Fieldhouse.
Wisconsin jumped out fairly quickly (both Deon Thomas and Andy Kpedi
got into first half foul trouble), leading 15-11, 39-32, and finally
46-34 at the break, as the Illini defense had a few lapses. Both
teams shot over 50%, so defense wasn't a highlight. The Badgers
increased the lead to 59-44 early in the second half, and led by 17
with 14:24 to go. Illinois reduced the lead to 76-70 with just
1:12 to go, but the Badgers did not break. With just the six point
deficit and the ball, Rennie Clemons missed a three, and after some
fouls, the Badgers made 7 of 8 at the foul line down the stretch.
The Badgers had five players in double figures, led by Willie
Simms' 18 points. Andy Kaufmann led Illinois with 19 points. The
Illini only went to the line four times, and two of those came on a
technical whistled on Patrick Tompkins. Pretty amazing in this era.
11,189 in Madison making their NIT plans...
Tonight:
#71 Minnesota at #2 INDIANA 7:00 pm CST
#48 Iowa at #201 NORTHWESTERN 7:00 pm SportsChannel
Saturday:
#55 Wisconsin at #71 MINNESOTA Noon Big Ten/Raycom
#29 Michigan State at #63 MICHIGAN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#201 Northwestern at #39 PURDUE 1:00 pm
Sunday:
#2 Indiana at #33 ILLINOIS 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
#8 Ohio State at #48 IOWA 1:00 pm ABC (regional)
[End of Regular Season]
RATINGS/RECORDS:
New New New Old
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
8 2 2 2 Ohio State 15-2 25-2 25-2
2 3 4 7 Indiana 13-3 25-4 25-4
33 26 28 NR Illinois 11-6 21-9 20-9
29 49 37 NR Michigan State 10-7 17-10 17-10
39 NR NR NR Purdue 8-9 16-11 16-11
55 NR NR NR Wisconsin 8-9 14-13 13-12
48 NR NR NR Iowa 7-9 18-10 16-10
63 NR NR NR Michigan 7-10 14-13 14-13
71 NR NR NR Minnesota 4-12 11-15 11-15
201 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-16 5-21 3-21
|
15.260 | More ugliness in the Big Ten | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 11 1991 13:30 | 10 |
|
What's Lou Henson's problem? From the clips I saw, sure, Bob was being
a poor winner, but given Henson's outburst I'd say Knight got the best
of him and now firmly holds the upper hand.
These guys truely hate each other guts, eh? (Henson: "He's nothing
but a bully... I asked him to step outside with me...")
glenn
|
15.261 | Last Thursday | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:06 | 79 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-8-91) NCAA
Date: 8 Mar 91 17:43:31 GMT
Thursday's Results:
#2 INDIANA 75, #71 Minnesota 59: The Gophers played tough early,
leading by as many as nine, but the Hoosiers' superior talent wore
them down over the long haul. Calbert Cheaney scored all of his 16
points in the second half as the Hoosiers pulled away. I'll try to
relay more details as they become available. My radio reception was
terrible, and neither McPaper nor the Chicago Tribune had much on
it today...
#48 Iowa 79, #201 NORTHWESTERN 76: The Hawkeyes dodged a major
league bullet last night, trailing by as many as 13 in the first
half and by as many as six with seven minutes left before pulling one
out at Welsh-Ryan Arena. James Moses was instrumental in bringing
Iowa back, hitting five three's in the game. He hit a huge one in
the final minutes which gave the Hawkeyes a lead they wouldn't
relinquish, though NU did shave it to one at 77-76 and had the ball
at the end, down three, after a missed Iowa 1-and-1. Jim Zabel
implored all of us to "squeeze your radios tight" in the last few
minutes, and it worked. He's going to have the "big one" during one
of these cliffhangers... Back to the game, Northwestern led 49-40
at halftime before Iowa started to chip away. The Hawkeyes pulled
within 61-57 under the 10 minute mark, but were down six again,
68-62, with 7:20 left, when 6'11" NU center Kevein Rankin fouled
out. This was a major blow, as the Wildcat offense then stagnated,
scoring only two more points until the 0:31 mark of the game. They
almost won anyway. Iowa took the lead finally at 69-68 on a Chris
Street basket. Pat Baldwin quickly put NU back up 70-69, but then a
three by Moses and another Street hoop put Iowa up 74-70. The lead
became six at 76-70 with just 0:31 left when Todd Leslie and Don
Brotz sandwiched threes around an Iowa free throw to cut the Iowa
lead to just 77-76 (Zabel was going beserk by this time). The Cats
called a timeout after Brotz' three, but were assessed a technical
since they had no timeouts left. However, since there were only 5
seconds left, it was the only strategy they had left. Troy Skinner
drained both FTs to make the score 79-76, and then Iowa passed the
ball in. A Hawkeye was immediately fouled (forgot who), but he
bricked the free throw and NU had one last chance, but they may not
even have gotten a shot off. Zabel was cheering more than
announcing at that point, so who knows. Val Barnes twisted an ankle
in the first half and sat out the second, making the win even more
remarkable. Moses had 29 points and James Winters 13 for Iowa.
7,112 on hand in Evanston to see Northwestern lose another home game
in frustrating fashion...
Saturday:
#55 Wisconsin at #71 MINNESOTA Noon CST Big Ten/Raycom
#29 Michigan State at #63 MICHIGAN 2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
#201 Northwestern at #39 PURDUE 1:00 pm
Sunday:
#2 Indiana at #33 ILLINOIS 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
#8 Ohio State at #48 IOWA 1:00 pm ABC (regional)
[End of Regular Season]
RATINGS/RECORDS:
New New New Old
Sagarin AP CNN UPI School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- --- ------ ------- ------- ---------
8 2 2 2 Ohio State 15-2 25-2 25-2
2 3 4 7 Indiana 14-3 26-4 26-4
33 26 28 -- Illinois 11-6 21-9 20-9
29 49 37 NR Michigan State 10-7 17-10 17-10
48 NR NR NR Iowa 8-9 19-10 17-10
39 NR NR NR Purdue 8-9 16-11 16-11
55 NR NR NR Wisconsin 8-9 14-13 13-12
63 NR NR NR Michigan 7-10 14-13 14-13
71 NR NR NR Minnesota 4-13 11-16 11-16
201 NR NR NR Northwestern 0-17 5-22 3-22
|
15.262 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Northeastern! What a Team!! | Mon Mar 11 1991 14:47 | 4 |
| So MorT, what do you think of yet another shameful BobKnight
episode. You know Tark would never show up another coach like that.
/Don
|
15.263 | Last regular season update | FORTSC::MOK | | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:20 | 97 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-11-91) NCAA
Date: 11 Mar 91 15:39:53 GMT
A productive weekend for the conference, as 5 teams were selected to the
Big Dance and two made the NIT. Ohio State got a #1 seeding in the
Midwest, at Dayton, despite getting hammered at Iowa. Indiana cruised
by Illinois and took the #2 spot in the Southeast at nearby Louisville
(I predicted those two). Michigan State won at Michigan and took the #5
spot in the West at Tucson, while Michigan will travel to Colorado to
face the Buffaloes in the NIT on Wednesday (ESPN). Iowa took the #7
spot in the Midwest at the nearby Metrodome in Minneapolis, Purdue
routed hapless Northwestern and nailed down the #7 spot in the East at
Cole Field House in College Park, Maryland, against Bill Cosby's Temple
Owls, and finally the Wisconsin Badgers will host Bowling Green
Wednesday night in Madison in the NIT. I will issue a separate posting
on the antics which occurred after the IU-Illinois game between Bob
Knight and Lou Henson... Northwestern became the first team to ever
finish 0-18 since the round robin format was began back in the early
1970's...
I will have tourney updates as the teams advance...
Saturday:
#67 MINNESOTA 80, #60 Wisconsin 70: The Gophers broke open a close
game in the second half, building a 19-point lead with a 27-7 run
before Wisconsin got within nine late. Rob Metcalf had a couple of
big treys to get the run going. Kevin Lynch led Minnesota with 18
points in his collegiate swan-song while Willie Simms had 23 for
Wisconsin. Before this win, the Gophers only had two wins over
Northwestern to show over the last 13 games. 16,622 at The Barn...
#26 Michigan State 66, #68 MICHIGAN 59: Steve Smith scored 18
points in the second half (24 for the game) as the Spartans held off
the Wolverins before a packed house of 13,609 in Ann Arbor.
Michigan hung in there in the first half despite 30% shooting and
Eric Riley's 9+ minutes of pine-time due to foul trouble. But, the
Spartans were able to keep Michigan at bay in the second half though
they could never put them away. Demetrius Calip led Michigan with
21 points...
#32 PURDUE 77, #204 Northwestern 48: Purdue blew away from the
Wildcats in the last 8 minutes of the first half and cruised to an
easy victory before 14,123 at Mackey Arena. Leading just 22-21,
the Boilermakers put on a 14-4 run to close the first half to lead
36-25, and began the second half with a spurt of 17-11 to go ahead
53-36, and finished the game with a 24-12 run. Jimmy Oliver, making
a bid for first-team all-Big Ten, scored 26 points. Kevin Rankin
had 17 for the Wildcats, who have now lost 46 straight Big Ten road
encounters and 22 straight Big Ten games...
Sunday:
#4 Indiana 70, #44 ILLINOIS 58: The Hoosiers opened with an 11-0
run, as it took Illinois six minutes to score, and IU basically
cruised. The Hoosiers led 16-2 before the Illini woke up, and saw
the lead trimmed to 24-18. But, IU closed the first half with a
17-7 run and took a 41-25 lead to the lockerroom. The Hoosiers led
by 18 several times early in the second half, then the Illini cut
the lead to 10-12 points and it seemed to stay that way until the
2:30 mark, when Illinois cut the deficit to 63-56. But, that's as
close as the Illini got, as IU made the free throws down the stretch
and put this game away. Eric Anderson led IU with 20 points while
Andy Kaufmann bulled his way to 21 for Illinois. 16,321 at the
Assembly Hall in Champaign...
#45 IOWA 80, #9 Ohio State 69: The Buckeyes closed out the season
on a very sour note, as the Hawkeyes beat them at their own game and
earned an NCAA bid. Iowa played a tremendous first half, blowing
out to a 47-39 halftime advantage. OSU got behind by as many as 14
points in the second half, but closed to within four twice, at 69-65
and 71-67, the latter with 2:05 left. After Perry Carter stripped
Acie Earl of the ball, the Buckeyes had a chance to get within one
or two, but Earl forced Carter into a travel and Iowa salted the
game away at the stripe. Rodell Davis led Iowa with 19 points,
while Jim Jackson had 24 for OSU. 15,500 rowdy ones at
Carver-Hawkeye Arena...
RATINGS/FINAL STANDINGS:
New Old New
Sagarin AP CNN Post School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- ---- ------ ------- ------- ---------
9 2 5 #1 Ohio State 15-3 25-3 25-3
4 3 3 #2 Indiana 15-3 27-4 27-4
44 26 45 -- Illinois 11-7 21-10 20-10
26 49 32 #5 Michigan State 11-7 18-10 18-10
45 NR 37 #7 Iowa 9-9 20-10 18-10
32 NR NR #7 Purdue 9-9 17-11 17-11
60 NR NR NIT Wisconsin 8-10 14-14 13-13
68 NR NR NIT Michigan 7-11 14-14 14-14
67 NR NR -- Minnesota 5-13 12-16 12-16
204 NR NR -- Northwestern 0-18 5-23 3-23
|
15.264 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:43 | 5 |
| What happened re: Knight and Henson? And When...
I didn't hear about anything on Sports news.
Mike JN
|
15.265 | Knight: classless; Henson: worse | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Mon Mar 11 1991 16:39 | 10 |
| Knight apparently got his hands on some Illinois self-promotional hype,
and sarcastically belittled the selections it made for Big 10 XXX of
year. Not so bad, even though most adults could have avoided it.
Henson responded by whining about Knight's actions, and tried to get
the state of Illinois to close ranks around him. ESPN speculated that
he was doing this with an eye toward recruiting as Knight has pulled
some plums from Ill. recently.
Dan
|
15.266 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:04 | 54 |
| >what do you think of yet another shameful BobKnight episode...
Bob ain't NEVER done anything wrong or shameful. He has a clean
slate.
>You know Tark would never show up another coach like that.
Cuz Tark is in the same class as Lou-do: Low class, as in cheating
for competitive advantage.
According to inside accounts, here's what happened:
Lou-do approached Bob in the runway outside the locker rooms and
offered to shake His hand. Bob told him he was a cheater and refused
Lou-cheat-ass' extended hand, turned and went into the visitor's
locker room. Lou, enraged at somebody showing enough honor & honesty
to call a cheat a cheat and to treat him accordingly, then proceeded
to pound on the locked Indiana door and to scream obscenities through
the door and for Bob to come out and fight. Bob declined, perhaps
unwisely, to come out and capitalize on a once-in-a-lifetime golden
opportunity to kick a lying cheat-ass' ass. Then, in the press room,
Bob, understandably angry from the threats and obscenities, borrowed
a pad and paper from a reporter and proceeded to mock Lou's infamous
press conference from last year where he'd drawn a map of the midwest
with arrows thrusting into Illinois from Iowa and Indiana (to explain
to the NCAA investigators why he ran such a scuzbag cheaty program) -
Bob drew Indiana thrusting a big thick black arrow thrusting into
Illinois from Hoosierland and, speaking in a whiney voice, mocked Lou
by putting on a_explanation about how the undermanned Hoosiers managed
to beat such a_awesome program as the one extolled in the SID's brochure
which failed to mention cheating and probation. Bob then explained
that a bullshit brochre like the one he was brandishing "wore his
ass out" and that he understood that a troubled program like Illinois'
"needed help" and that "I'd like to help this program solve their
problems but I'm too busy right now, I've got a NCAA tourney to go
to."
Then Lou-do got up and did his whiney routine, falsely implying that
it's bullying to refuse to shake a known liar's hand, or to come out
and kick a known cheat's ass.
I disagree with these false assertions. I point out that Lou commands
the undying disrespect of several other honest coach's who've recruited
against the high-paying Lou-do, Dr. Malpractice and Digger Phelps among
them.
This almost tops the time Bob did a 20 minute interview on his TV show
with a jackass dressed up as a Purdue cheerleader wherein he queried
Ms. Mule on the Boilermaker hoops program and campus life in West Lafayette.
Ha haa. Way to go Bob! Chump the old cheat-ass! Give him his just
disrespect. In Lou's face !! Haa.
Big10 Tom
|
15.267 | Many similarities | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:15 | 10 |
| From what I've read, this seems like the old Chuck Noll/Sam Wyche
arguement. Notice the similarities between Noll and Knight, two
tell-it-like-it-is winners; notice the similarities between Wyche and
Henson, two crybaby losers.
Like Noll said when Wyche whined about not getting a handshake: "I
don't shake the hands of people I don't like; it's hypocritical.
Winners let it go. Losers cry about it." End of press conference.
--dan'l
|
15.268 | I thought there were no cheat-asses in the BIG10? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Northeastern! What a Team!! | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:20 | 1 |
|
|
15.269 | proper perspective... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | SodomWDavisDFennerJWorthyACChris | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:21 | 11 |
| Thank you, dan'l. Let's look at this situation from the perspective
of Bob. Put yourself in *Bob's* shoes: If you were standing in a
dark alley, and a whorish AIDS victim came up to you - open running
puss sores in the forehaid, damp spots on her dress from open leisions,
the stench of dried scab all about her - and she demanded that you let
her plunge her long mottled tongue down your throat by way of a good-bye
kiss...
Is it wrong for you to decline?
Big10 Tom
|
15.270 | Bob was quite the comedian to Henson's fool... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:44 | 10 |
|
I liked the part when a sarcastic Bob referred to the obvious "NCAA
conspiracy" that had staked out and snared poor Henson...
Henson comes off a lot like one of them TV preachers, with the whiny
twang in his voice that barely masks the underlying insincerity. Maybe
there's a place for him in the ACC?
glenn
|
15.271 | Let's get the parameters before I decide | SACT41::ROSS | Blub... blub.. blub | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:53 | 6 |
| > her plunge her long mottled tongue down your throat by way of a good-bye
> kiss...
>
> Is it wrong for you to decline?
How many lesions and how far down my throat?
|
15.273 | Help | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Tue Mar 12 1991 17:32 | 8 |
|
Cain someone pluz tell me where this dude's place on the court is?
Jim Jackson..OSU
Thanks,
B.A.
|
15.274 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Mar 12 1991 17:49 | 7 |
| When I saw him he was playing Forward, but the Associated Press named
him to the All America Second Team as a Guard.
???? if you are thinking about him for the Contest, check with Doug,
since he's running it for us; maybe Jimmy can be an either/or.
Mike JN
|
15.275 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | SodomWDavisFennerWorthyACChris | Wed Mar 13 1991 15:10 | 8 |
| >Knight: classless;
Of course, what Dan's saying here is that in order to be "classy"
one must accord respect to a known cheat. Not surprising, coming
from Dan SnideAir, a fellow who's made public impassioned pleas for
racial segregation and lowered academic standards, eh?
Big10 Tom
|
15.276 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | ACCrisp: MaleHumanAlumnusSlut | Wed Mar 13 1991 15:49 | 11 |
|
>in order to be "classy" one must accord respect to a known cheat.
Didn't think a it when I wrote this, but you're setting us up. Right
now we're celebrating the 1st anniversary of the rigged contest in
which you were caught cheating. Ergo, to be "classy," we must accord
you respect and courtesy.
LouHenson,JimValvano,NormStewart,EddieSutton,JohnWooden,DanSnideAir
Big10 Tom
|
15.277 | Ah, go make up another story about Knight and the Russians | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Wed Mar 13 1991 17:58 | 9 |
| >...which you were caught cheating.
*I* was caught cheating?! Ah yes, hysterical, historical revision
time, I guess.
It was found that I won honestly and deservedly, and I magnanimously
gave a ticket to the second place finisher.
Dan
|
15.278 | | RECURS::WAHL | Semper Gumby | Thu Mar 14 1991 12:50 | 9 |
| I'm confused. I know that's not hard to do, but nevertheless, I
don't understand what Knight's problem is. (That is, what
specific problem Knight has with Henson.) How did Henson
allegedly cheat, and whose ass was cheated?
Maybe I should just stick to baseball. It's easier to understand
Rickey Henderson and Darryl Strawberry than these guys.
Dave W.
|
15.279 | | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | The crux of the biscuit | Thu Mar 14 1991 15:14 | 11 |
| Re: .-1 Henson as cheater
Illinois has been placed on probation for two years for "lack of
institutional control". A lot of wrongs going on, one of which was an
offer of $80,000 and a Chevy Blazer to two recruits, one of whom is
currently an Illini (Thomas) whom admitted it on tape.
Knight and Henson have both been reprimanded by the Big 10 for
embarrassing the conference.
Dan
|
15.280 | A no big deal cheat ass, one would suppose | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Thu Mar 14 1991 16:02 | 7 |
| Keep in mind that this same Lou Henson whom our fabled MrT is now calling
a "cheat ass" is the same Lou Henson whose program's violations were also
called "no big deal" by that same MrT.
Cake and eat it, I suspect (sigh) once again ...
Bob Hunt
|
15.281 | | RECURS::WAHL | Semper Gumby | Fri Mar 15 1991 01:43 | 5 |
| $80K and a car for playing roundball? *I* wouldn't shake his hand,
either. If that's "poor judgement", I'd hate to see what a real
crime is.
Dave W.
|
15.282 | J.Brown? | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Hotlanta is getting warmer! | Mon Mar 18 1991 15:33 | 9 |
|
Help...
How many points did Jammel Brown have in the second game this
weekend?
Thx...
B.A.
|
15.283 | Why shouldn't they pay? Very good question ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 18 1991 16:20 | 21 |
| Gotta admit I'm really enjoying the new adidas ads. So far I've seen
BobKnight in a couple of different ones and a John McEnroe look-alike
smashing his racket whilst having at the linesman. The amazing part is
they're actually dealing with some real meaty arguments, like poor
sportsmanship and the recent NCAA decision to cut hoops scholarships.
Bob sez he's always looking for other/better ways and he suggests they
start charging the media to attend NCAA events to pay for the drop in
scholarships. (Around 600 kids will not get scholarships thanks to the
recent ridiculous NCAA convention during which they put on a great
media hype show whilst dealing with NONE of the serious issues facing
college athletics.)
Anyways all I can say is "AMEN, BOB.". At the ACC Tournament alone I
counted five (5) tables running the length of the court that were
strictly for the media. They all got in for zilch. (The tourney tix
ran ya $105 per, *if* you were lucky enough to have the opportunity to
buy them.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.284 | Yeah, but you're forgetting ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:05 | 11 |
| You're forgetting again, Soup, that Bob Knight needs the media every bit
as much as they need him.
Asking the media to pay for tickets to cover a sports event would be like
us forcing Computerworld to pay to see our newest VAX. Guarantee ya that
they'd go over to IBM instead for the free hors d'oeuvres and open bar.
You have this anti-media thing nailed down solid, don'tcha ??? Both Dean
and Bob would be very proud of ya.
Bob Hunt
|
15.285 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:06 | 5 |
| I haven't caught many of the commercials, I'm usually either watching in
a Sports Bar, where you can't hear anything anyway, or at home with the
sound turned down so there's not all that squeaking ;'D
Mike JN
|
15.286 | | ISLNDS::WASKOM | | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:22 | 14 |
| The new Adidas ad, with the multiple shots of folks doing sports
"no-no's", is excellent. It even made my 17-year old sit up and
say "That's terrific". Yes, that is John McEnroe throwing a tantrum
on the tennis court. A shot of a steroids container with the over-dub
"Sports isn't about gimmicks". A shot of a stock car driver switching
hats during the post-race interview and the over-dub "Sports isn't
about commercialism". Final shot is a casket and flowers, over-dubbed
with "Sports shouldn't be (or aren't, I've forgotten) life and death"
[why am I reminded of British soccer games?]. Final comment is
something to the effect of "Let's get back to the basics of sport".
Brings up a lot of the more serious issues that we cover in here.
A&W
|
15.287 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN! | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:35 | 9 |
| While these new ads are nice, I don't remember Addidas doing anything
about their infamous "Addidas Troop" line of 'sports' accessories -
which were basically clothes for gangs. They didn't give a flying
blank at a rolling doughnut then, did they?
Oh, and A&W, you may have thought about British soccer cause there's a
small shot of a riot at a British soccer game in the ad.
JD
|
15.288 | Compared w/ most endorsements, Knight did himself proud | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 18 1991 17:54 | 29 |
|
Only problem with the Adidas ad might be that by the end, where I've
agreed with everything they've said, I'm asking myself: "They're
right. What do I need that new $75 pair of Adidas for?" Adidas might
not be hyping their product as much as the others, but their
top-of-the-line isn't any more essential to sport than the next guy's.
I think Knight made his point. The closing line about the media was
*A JOKE*. Given Bob's history with the media and his dead-pan
delivery, I thought it was very funny the first time I saw it. And
while Knight might realize that the media serves a purpose and he needs
it, he's also smart enough to know that his criticisms of it aren't
going to hurt him or his program. That's the beauty of it: if he
combats the media and keeps it honest, they'll only keep coming back
for more. As long as he stays clean, he's a curmudgeon, a character,
a constant in college basketball. Everybody wins...
As an example, I liked Knight's treatment this weekend of the
reporter who kept pestering him about whether he'd make adjustments
in response to Florida State's "athleticism". Instead of sputtering
some nonsensical cliches, he kept the guy at bay by saying that he
didn't know what he meant, that basketball is an athletic game, an
athletic competition, so FSU's "athleticism" didn't concern him more
than any other team's. It was Knight at his most difficult, but a
straightforward Knight you could respect for giving a stupid,
loaded question the reaction it deserved.
glenn
|
15.289 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN! | Tue Mar 19 1991 10:32 | 6 |
| Glenn,
Right on. I found Knight's media comment to be pretty funny. IMO,
'athleticism' is one of those 'veiled' comments.
JD
|
15.290 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | ACCrisp: MaleHumanAlumnusSlut | Tue Mar 19 1991 15:23 | 22 |
| > -< Ah, go make up another story about Knight and the Russians >-
Given your wanton wholesale disregard for Factual Reality, we'll
just "forget" these established facts:
1. Indiana's squad left the floor only after the Russians did.
2. The Russians left after the official went over to the scorer's
table and officially declared the game over, forfeited by Indiana
per the 3 bench technical rule (Bob drew 3 bench TFs).
3. The USAA sent Bob a letter apologizing for the offical's actions.
We'll just "pretend" that Bob got sore and yanked his squad from the
floor, and never mind the fact that 15,000 people (Dick Vitale among
them) thought they saw what's described above. Let's just call it
a mass hallucination and remind ourselves that the needs of Bob myth-
building is better served by the story that he quit the game.
> -< Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UConn! >-
And sports ain't about regional bias, neither, is it, JD?
Big10 Tom
|
15.291 | BEast loyalty in yo face!!!!!! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Have YOU seen Elvis today?? | Tue Mar 19 1991 21:05 | 9 |
| BTTom,
re: regional bias comment....
Take a *** pill!!!
;^)
Kev
|
15.292 | All-American/All-Big Ten | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Mar 20 1991 18:40 | 43 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-12-91) NCAA
Date: 12 Mar 91 17:29:49 GMT
The AP All-American team included Jim Jackson of Ohio State and Steve
Smith of Michigan State on it's second team, while Indiana's Calbert
Cheaney made the third team. Honorable mention included: Damon Bailey
of Indiana (c'mon), Treg Lee of Ohio State, Kevin Lynch of Minnesota
(double c'mon). No Jimmy Oliver of Purdue, Eric Anderson of IU, or
Demetrius Calip of Michigan, three players which would supplant Bailey
and Lynch on most any Midwestern team.
Then, the AP All-Big Ten was announced:
First Team: Jackson, Smith, Cheaney, Oliver, Patrick Tompkins (Wis)
Second Team: Lynch, Calip, Andy Kaufmann (Ill), Eric Anderson (Ind), and
Acie Earl (Iowa). No Bailey!
I didn't catch the third team, but Randy Ayers of OSU was named Coach of
the Year and Damon Bailey was named Frosh of the Year. The announcer
did not list a Player of the Year, but if they chose one, I assume it
was Jackson.
[....]
RATINGS/RECORDS: (IU ended up 3rd in UPI, OSU 5th and MSU 22nd)
New New New
Sagarin AP CNN Post School Big Ten Overall vs. Div I
------- -- --- ---- ------ ------- ------- ---------
9 5 5 #1 Ohio State 15-3 25-3 25-3
4 3 3 #2 Indiana 15-3 27-4 27-4
44 37 45! -- Illinois 11-7 21-10 20-10
26 35 32 #5 Michigan State 11-7 18-10 18-10
45 29! 37 #7 Iowa 9-9 20-10 18-10
32 NR! NR! #7 Purdue 9-9 17-11 17-11
60 NR NR NIT Wisconsin 8-10 14-14 13-13
68 NR NR NIT Michigan 7-11 14-14 14-14
67 NR NR -- Minnesota 5-13 12-16 12-16
204 NR NR -- Northwestern 0-18 5-23 3-23
|
15.293 | Last Wed | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Mar 20 1991 18:41 | 38 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-14-91) NCAA
Date: 14 Mar 91 23:14:20 GMT
Wednesday's Results in the NIT:
#34 COLORADO 71, #68 Michigan 64: The Wolverines led by only six
points at halftime, even though the Buffaloes shot an incredibly bad
14% from the field, and it killed them, as the Buffs got hot in the
second half and pulled away from Michigan in the final couple
minutes. Shaun Vandiver was a man, as he and Demetrius Calip led
their respective teams in scoring. A tough assignment for Michigan
out in Boulder. Colorado moves on in the NIT, while Michigan's
season ends at 14-15, their first losing one since the 8-19 team of
1982. Vandiver scored 17 of his 27 points in the second half, as
the Buffaloes cam back from a 25-19 halftime deficit. They took
their first second-half lead at 42-41 with 10:49 left, though the
game see-sawed and was in doubt until the final minute...
#60 WISCONSIN 87, #78 Bowling Green 79 (OT): The Badgers had their
hands full with the Falcons from Ohio, a team which has beaten
Michigan State each of the last two seasons. Willie Simms scored a
career-high 31 point, six of them in the second session. Bowling
Green (17-13) had tied the game at the end of regulation on a
10-footer by Ed Colbert in this exciting game...
Big Ten NCAA lineup:
#45 IOWA 76, #19 East Tennessee State (28-5) 73: More details
tomorrow morning, but the Hawkeyes staved off ETSU with two FTs with
2.8 seconds remaining. Iowa trailed by as many as 10 in the first
half. Rodell Davis made a huge steal, and an ensuing basket gave
Iowa a 74-70 lead, this very late in the game. ETSU hit a three to
make things interesting...
[....]
|
15.294 | Last Thur | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Mar 20 1991 18:43 | 78 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-15-91) NCAA
Date: 15 Mar 91 20:57:49 GMT
[....]
Big Ten NCAA lineup:
Thursday's Results:
Midwest Region, Minneapolis:
#45 IOWA (21-10) 76, #19 East Tennessee State (28-5) 73: Rodell
Davis' steal on the press and hoop gave Iowa a 74-70 lead which
turned out to be just enough. The Hawkeyes trailed by 10 points in
the first half to the depleted ETSU team, but came back and held on.
ETSU still had a four point lead of 37-33 at halftime. Troy Skinner
was perfect from the field and scored 14 points, along with James
Moses. Acie Earl had 18. The Hawkeyes ruled the boards 39-26,
before 25,759 at the HumpDome...
East Region, College Park:
#35 Temple (22-9) 80, #32 PURDUE (17-12) 63: The Owls, who normally
struggle offensively with a 43% field goal percentage and a scoring
average under 70 points, blistered the Maryland nets to the tune of
65% (30 of 46) and pulled away from Purdue. After a 9-8 Purdue
lead, the Owls never trailed. From a 13-13 tie, they blew out to
27-18, 31-20, and 37-27 at the break. Temple shot 69% in the first
half (15-22). Purdue looked to turn the tide early in the second
half, scoring the half's first 8 points to close to 37-35. But a
Temple trey, duece, and trey produced 8 consecutive points of it's
own (45-35) and the closest Purdue ever got again was five twice, at
45-40 and 68-63, with 2:11 left. The Owls biggest lead (before the
final margin) was at 62-49. Two Purdue treys had brought the
Boilers within 68-63, one of them by Travis Trice. But, Temple just
could not miss in this game, and scored the game's final 12 points.
Mik Kilgore, a 6'8", 210 pound forward who roams the perimeter, was
just too much to handle, scoring 25 points on 8 of 11 shooting from
the field and a perfect 6 of 6 from the stripe. He was 3 of 4 from
three-point land, even though he's only a 39% shooter from that
distance normally. Temple was 6 of 10 from that range overall. The
four starters besides Mark Macon, who scored 19 but was not
dominant, were 23 of 32 from the floor (72%). Jimmy Oliver had 21
points for Purdue (the only one in double figures), but was only 8
of 19 from the floor. Chuckie White had 13 boards but was terrible
on offense, scoring only 7 points. John Chaney said, "You can only
hope and dream for a night like this. We did a good job of getting
the ball to the principal people on the floor, and hitting the A, B,
C shots." Gene Keady said, "Their quickness was a major factor".
The Owls played a great game and will now face Dick Tarrant and the
Richmond Spiders. Good luck... 13,386 at Cole Field House...
Southeast Region, Louisville:
#2 INDIANA (28-4) 79, #105 Coastal Carolina (24-8) 69: In the
first half, Coastal Carolina looked like the worst team which ever
played in the NCAA tournament. In the end, Indiana was relieved to
get a tough victory. Brian Penny, a guard, put on one of the
greatest shooting displays in NCAA tourney history, nailing 13 of 15
fielders (5 of 6 from trifecta land), and nearly brought the
Chanticleers (a stud rooster) back from the 46-30 halftime deficit.
Actually, they were down by just three with just over two minutes to
go, with the ball, but Eddie Lesaine, who scored only 5 points, took
an ill-advised three with no rebounders under the hoop, and IU
grabbed the carrom and salted the game away at the stripe (why
didn't they let Penny shoot?!?). Indiana committed only 2 second
half fouls, prompting the CCU coach to comment, "Indiana University
plays the cleanest defense in the country", in a sarcastic tone.
Eric Anderson led IU with 22 points, while Penny finished with a
career-high 34 points. IU repeatedly stole errant Chanticleer
passes in the first half and scored on the break. Damon Bailey hit
a crucial three after Lesaine's miss, before a partisan crowd of
18,217 at Freedom Hall...
[....]
|
15.295 | Last Fri - Sun | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Mar 20 1991 18:43 | 120 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-18-91) NCAA
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 20:21:24 GMT
Friday's NCAA Results:
West Region, Tucson:
#26 MICHIGAN STATE (19-10) vs. #66 Wisconsin-GB (24-7): A Steve Smith
15-foot J at the horn gave the Spartans a tough win over the Phoenix
of UWGB. The leading scorer for UWGB, Tony Bennett, was held to
just 9 points, perhaps due to some foul trouble. State trailed much
of the game. Smith ended up with 19 points, while Dean Vander Plas
led the team from Titletown with 17 points, before 13,367 at
gArY's hOuSe...
Midwest Region, Dayton:
#9 OHIO STATE (26-3) 97, #154 Towson State (19-11) 86: OSU ended
it's two-game losing skid with a win over TSU. The Buckeyes built
an 18-point second half lead (after being ahead 45-37 at the break),
but Towson got within 75-70 with only 5:33 left. Ohio State then
began to pull away again with a 7-2 spurt. Towson played OSU pretty
tough in this game. Jim Jackson led the Buckeyes with 24
points, before a partisan crowd of 13,055 at the UD Arena...
Saturday's Results:
Midwest Region, Minneapolis:
#5 Duke (28-7) 85, #45 IOWA (21-11) 70: The Blue Devils dismantled the
vaunted Iowa press with passes over the top and easy hoops to blow out
the Hawkeyes. The first half was fairly close up to the point when
Duke led 30-26, but they then had a 14-3 run to close the half and led
44-29 at the break. The lead ballooned to 53-33 before Iowa made a
comeback, getting as close as 12 points, but Duke was never in
danger. Duke is such a well-coached team. Christian Laettner led
the scoring for the ACC team with 19 points, while James Moses had
23 for the Hawkeyes. 28,114 at the Metrodome up north, including
lots of Hawkeye backers...
Southeast Region, Louisville:
#4 INDIANA (29-4) 82, #46 Florida State (21-11) 60: Florida State played
a great first half and a horrid second half, as a 6-point haltime lead
turned into a 22-point loss. The 'Noles led by 11, at 36-25, late
in the first half, and the aroma of upset was in the air. But, IU
closed the first half with a 7-2 run, including a trey in the waning
seconds, and opened with a 21-2 second half run (28-4 in all), to build
a 53-40 lead, and the game was over. The Hoosiers made 3 treys
during the second half surge. FSU got into some foul trouble as
well, which didn't help them. Calbert Cheaney led IU with 24
points, while Douglas Edwards had 18 points and 14 boards for Pat
Kennedy's crew, before 18,946 partisan IU supporters at Freedom
Hall...
Sunday's Results:
West Region, Tucson:
#43 Utah (30-3) 85, #26 MICHIGAN STATE 84 (19-11) (2OT): In a great game
marred by some really assine switching by CBS (do those buffoons really
think we would rather listen to Nance, Packer, and dough-boy Francesa
instead of watching one of two cliffhangers in progress?), it seemed
as though the Spartans had the "luck of the green" going for them,
turning apparent defeat into extra sessions twice, using some
strange circumstances. This game was closely contested from the
opening tipoff, as both teams seemed evenly matched. State led
33-29 at halftime, though both teams led the half, and the second
half remained a see-saw affair. The Spartans appeared dead, down
64-60 with only about 30 seconds left in regulation, when a bizarre
drive and hoop by Matt Steigenga (I think) and foul by Utah on Steve
Smith resulted in a four-point play (the whistle blew as Steigenga
was still driving, so I really don't know how the hoop could have
counted). Smith made both FTs, and the teams went to OT after Utah
missed a trey. Utah led the first OT with something like 6.6
seconds to go when Mike Peplowski missed a bunny put-back, but was
fouled. He bricked both FTs, but the second one went right to Jon
Zulauf, who put in the carrom and sent the game to a second OT. The
luck finally ran out for State in OT-2, though, as the Utes built a
four-point lead and withstood Smith's last trey, as MSU could not
stop the clock and Utah simply held the ball out of bounds. Smith
had 28 points, and Josh Grant 29 for Utah, as Rick Majerus does
another great coaching job at Utah. He called it, "the best
game I've probably ever been involved in in my life". 13,497 antsy
fans at the McKale Center, who were waiting for the Vegas-G'town
game to start...
Midwest Region, Dayton:
#9 OHIO STATE (27-3) 65, #23 Georgia Tech (17-13) 61: The Buckeyes
were lucky to win this game, as the Jackets blew several
opportunities to tie or reduce the lead when down by just 2 or 3 for
what seemed like an eternity down the stretch. Perry Carter scored
19 points and grabbed 18 boards in a great effort. Kenny Anderson
just couldn't buy a hoop, shooting a miserable 8 of 28 and missing
countless shots down the stretch. The Buckeyes saw their 8-point
halftime advantage, which went to 10 with nine minutes to go,
dwindle to just two at 58-56 with only :32 left. The Buckeyes
managed to get the important boards and make the FTs when it
counted, finally. Many of Anderson's misses were wide-open. Both
teams shot an identical .369 from the floor (24 of 65), and the game
had 94 rebounds because of the terrible shooting (OSU had 50).
Anderson still led Tech with 25 points, while Jim Jackson was held
to 16 on 5 of 17 shooting, before 13,055 in Dayton...
Thursday Night:
Southeast Regional, Charlotte Coliseum:
#4 INDIANA (29-4) vs. #7 Kansas (24-7)
Friday Night:
Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
#9 OHIO STATE (27-3) vs. #39 St. John's (22-8)
[....]
|
15.296 | Saying nice things about Bob | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Thu Mar 21 1991 10:43 | 22 |
| A few days ago, a Charlotte Observer sports columnist wrote a column in
which he found it hard to say anything nice about Bob Knight. So
people wrote and faxed things to him. Here are some highlights of
today's column:
"There are three nice things to say about Bobby Knight. And they're
hanging in Assembly Hall. How many nice things does Dean Smith have?
One?"
"Bobby Knight embarrassed our school and our state and didn't act like
a class guy. But that's Bobby Knight. And if Indiana beats Kansas,
they'll beat Arkansas. Bet? You want to bet? I can't bet money.
Lunch." - Kendall Gill
"There's the good and there's the bad about Bobby Knight. I'm trying
to be as vague as possible." - Steve Scheffler
"Bobby Knight is thoughtful, loyal and considerate" - Quinn Buckner
(Knight's reply to Buckner's statement: "What was he on?")
--dan'l
|
15.297 | another reason why he's the best
| AGNT99::CHILDS | Baseball = Hi-Bore-Nation Season ;^( | Thu Mar 21 1991 11:05 | 12 |
|
How about Knight's classic yesterday? There was a press conference scheduled
at X-hour. Knight shows up about 12 minutes late. He then explains that the
NCAA has a rule which states that all games must start by 10 pm EST and his
game saturday nite started at 10:12 pm so he figured his watch must be off
12 minutes so he was just adding that much time to his watch so he would be
in time with the rest of the univere....
hahahahahaaahahahaha
mike
|
15.298 | Knightisms | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Thu Mar 21 1991 11:21 | 11 |
| As that press conference continued, he had some other good ones.
The camera lights were bright and shining in his eyes. He put his hand
to his head and covered his eys, squinting, and said: "You'd have a
hard time catching a bly ball in here."
Knight on Kansas coach Roy Williams: "He coaches well and he is as
impressive as any coach I've seen. He and the boy at Duke, I never
could pronounce that SOB's name, have done a great job."
--dan'l
|
15.299 | | SACT41::ROSS | BobKnight > DeanSmith | Thu Mar 21 1991 11:32 | 2 |
| That's the biggest difference between Bob and Dean. Bob's real, Dean's
a cipher.
|
15.300 | I'm not a member of either Jihad, but this is silly | EARRTH::BROOKS | In memorium : Al Cote ... | Thu Mar 21 1991 12:32 | 6 |
| Bob mentioned Coach K at Duke.
talk about taking the pipe ! How many titles has Duke hauled in anyhow,
out of how many Final Four trips ? And how bad were the beatings ?
Doc
|
15.301 | It's the Man, not the men | SHALOT::MEDVID | wild but not lost | Thu Mar 21 1991 13:07 | 10 |
| Duke has taken the pipe in the final four, yes. But, in my opinion, K
has coached them to that point whereas the talent that Smith has
recruited is what got them to the dance so many times.
Just my opinion, mind you, but a very valid one. UNC has been loaded,
dripping, listing with talent over the years and goes home early just
about every year. Duke has had one or two stars and a supporting cast
that K manages to take pretty darn far...three straight final fours.
--dan'l
|
15.302 | IU lost | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:37 | 44 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-22-91) NCAA
Date: 22 Mar 91 15:16:27 GMT
Thursday Night's Result:
Southeast Regional, Charlotte Coliseum:
#7 Kansas 83 (25-7), #4 INDIANA (29-5) 65: This was simply a
good, old-fashioned butt-whipping by Roy Williams' Jayhawks,
following the same thing inflicted on Alabama by Arkansas. This
one began early, as the Jayhawks raced out 12-2, 16-4, 21-4, and
26-6 before IU knew what it them. The Hoosiers then righted
themselves and cut the huge lead down to 28-17 with about 8 minutes
to go in the half. The lead remained in the 11-15 point range then
until late in the half, when KU blew out to a 49-27 halftime
advantage. They slightly broadened the lead during the first
portion of the second half, to 60-37, before IU mounted a comeback
which saw them get as close as 13 points, but that was it. The
first time the team pulled within 14 was at 68-54 with about 6
minutes to go. It was 74-61 under the five minute mark when the
Jayhawks ran off 4 points to lead 78-61, and coasted home with free
throws. Actually, the outcome probably could have been much worse if
KU had made their free throws during the bulk of the second half.
At one point, they were only 6 of 14 and had missed 3 or 4
consecutive front ends of bonuses. This was probably the only
thing which allowed IU to remain within shouting distance. Kansas
dominated every other aspect of this game, in what some might
consider a shocking result. Roy Williams has to be given
all the credit for devising a great game plan, as Kansas repeatedly
worked for easy shots in the paint against IU's admittedly weak
inside game. The guards lit it up from outside early as well, which
always helps open things up. A most-impressive showing to be sure
from this Big Eight power, setting up a very interesting contrast in
styles tomorrow versus Arkansas (what do you think of the Hogs now,
Mimi Griffin??? Arkansas doesn't even have to face IU!)...
Tonight's Matchup:
Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
#9 OHIO STATE (27-3) vs. #39 St. John's (22-8) 6:40 pm CST
|
15.303 | Awful quiet in here! | WMOIS::REEVE_C | | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:01 | 1 |
|
|
15.304 | Belated final update | FORTSC::MOK | | Wed Mar 27 1991 14:39 | 33 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: FINAL Big Ten UPDATE (3-25-91) NCAA
Date: 25 Mar 91 14:57:40 GMT
Friday's Miserable Result:
Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
#39 St. John's (23-8) 91, #9 OHIO STATE (27-4) 74: Ohio State
certainly picked the worst possible time to lay a big, fat egg.
But, Easter is coming up, isn't it... 43-24 at halftime! It was an
"NCer", to be sure. The Redmen from the tough, tough Big East
conference completely dismantled the Big Ten's purported best team
before a mostly partisan 30,461 Big Ten fans at the Pontiac
Silverdome, site of Purdue's collosal choke to Kansas State three
years ago. As the AP put it, St. John's "beat the top-seeded
Buckeyes at their own game...They outshot, outran and outrebounded
Ohio State..." Mark Baker said, "St. John's kind of catches you
off-guard. Everybody said they like to control the tempo, but they
pushed the ball up." Looie said, "To play that well and sustain it
makes me feel very, very good." Ohio State only got as close as 16
points in the second half. When the score read 84-59, I just
thought to myself, "You've got to be kidding!" St. John's is good,
obviously, but Duke sure kicked them yesterday. Not a good final
month for the Buckeyes, who truly struggled after the epic second
OSU-Indiana matchup. Jim Jackson had 19 points to lead OSU. The
seniors Perry Carter and Treg Lee had bad finales, scoring 9 and 6,
respectively. The Buckeyes even got outrebounded 29-28, and that
doesn't happen often. Robert Werdann had a career-high 21 points
and Malik Sealy 22 for the Johnies...
[....]
|
15.305 | Tsk, tsk, tsk | SHALOT::HUNT | Swatch dogs and Diet Coke heads | Thu Mar 28 1991 12:52 | 7 |
| Minnesota got two years of probation, a ban on football post-season for
next year, and the loss of a hoops scholarship for next year, too. The
wrestling team had some minor penalty placed on it as well.
Lou Holtz and Luther Darville were both implicated in the infractions.
Bob Hunt
|
15.306 | Henderson vs. Robinson in HoosierDome | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Mon Apr 22 1991 15:13 | 24 |
| Saw the Indiana state high school hoops championship game on ESPN
this weekend. It featured star recruits Glenn Robinson (Purdue)
and Alan Henderson (Indiana).
Let me just say that the only question remaining about Robinson is
whether he's ready for the NBA. This kid is a true widebody. Very
explosive. He reminds me a lot of Alonzo Mourning, but seems to be
somewhat quicker in the open court. I have trouble imagining how
this Webber kid from Michigan cain be any better than Robinson.
Henderson is a painfully thin, but highly skilled. Dunno if he was
tired (they play twice on Championship day) but he was slow to get
upcourt. Henderons' game suffered mightily from Gary Roosevelt's
collapsing zone designed to take his game away. He acted on his
frustration by canning a trey or two and going 1-on-2 with some
success. He's got good hands, a nice shot, cain put theball on the
floor effectively, and fine timing on his jump. His major weakness
is lack of strength, but he's only 17 somaybe his physique will fill
out. I'd heard that Alan was slated to play forward, but with his
current skills he looks more like a center to me.
Glenn, on the other hand, has the muscled body of a 28 year old main.
Big10 Tom
|
15.307 | Get ready folks, cause the 'No Widebodies' notes will start soon | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Apr 22 1991 15:47 | 8 |
| Nice setup MrT. Having said all that you can now, in all good
conscience of course, point to the fack (tm) that IU was physically
outmanned each and every time they lose next year.
Poetry! Sheer, poetry!! [:^(]
- ACC Chris
|
15.308 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Mon Apr 22 1991 16:09 | 24 |
| As is always the case, both independent analysts and events will
confirm my statements. Henderson is skinny. Real skinny. Glen
is a buck stud by anybody's definition.
These plain facts cain't be wiped away by your foundation-laying
obfuscation.
As for next year's Hoosier talent level, I see this team (guessing,
cuz I haven't even seen two of their three recruits) as being the
most talented since the Isiah team of '81.
For the first time in a full decade Bob will have height, strength,
and depth along the front-line. It's possible that Calbert Cheany
will shift at least part-time to his more natural position of off
guard. No 6-2 ex-substitute guards in grad school playing forward,
no centers and/or forwards who went largely unrecruited out of high
school. A real honest to god team along the lines of what the other
big-time programs have.
True, I was disappointed the second I saw Henderson stand next to the
scary Robinson, but five guys play on each side and Henderson looks
like he'll be Indiana's best front-court player in a loooooong time.
Big10 Tom
|
15.309 | And you'll still be claiming upset wins, too. | SHALOT::HUNT | If Do Then Damned Else Damned | Mon Apr 22 1991 16:29 | 9 |
| � Nice setup MrT. Having said all that you can now, in all good
� conscience of course, point to the fack (tm) that IU was physically
� outmanned each and every time they lose next year.
All of which, of course, doesn't relieve you of your team's pathetic
but cherished heritage of declaring itself the poor underdog every
time it laces up its' sneakers.
Bob Hunt
|
15.310 | Expectations will be soaring for the Hucksters(tm) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Apr 22 1991 17:11 | 19 |
| Neither me nor Dean ever declared ourselves the 'poor underdog every
time (we lace up our sneakers)'.
We *have* correctly pointed out that when we go 29-6 with marginally
talented players it doesn't mean we cruised 29 times on our talent
and were upset 6 times.
Enough on this anyways. What I wanna know is if MorT will belly to the
bar and admit that IU deserves the favorite role for the National Title
next year. (As Dickie Vitale has already indicated.)
I personally feel as though Duke deserves this honor, but that IU
should be given the #2 spot. Anything less than a Big 10 Title and
trip to the Finals should be considered a disapointment. (If they
don't play Duke in the Finals, BTW, anything less than a Title should
be considered a disapointment.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.311 | I mean, they've got Final Four "experience" and everything... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Apr 22 1991 17:48 | 8 |
|
Other than the obvious reason of the respective coaching, why shouldn't
North Carolina with the "marginally talented" (Chris) "Greatest
Freshman Class of All Time" (hoops experts) be considered Number Two to
Duke in the pre-season?
glenn
|
15.312 | Unbelievable consistent excellence by Dean has side effects... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:20 | 22 |
| Ha ha! Good one glenn. Imagine trying to accuse the media of *under*
valuing Carolina's team in a given year! Haw haw!!!
No, just wearing jerseys that read 'NORTH CAROLINA' instantly means a
Top 10 preseason ranking, minimum. Any HS player we're interested in
will have his stock immediately raised by the talent scouts. Anything
less than a Title or at least a Final 2 appearance is a disapointment.
And to suggest anything else labels you a 'whiner'.
Truthfully I'd say next years Carolina bunch has the *potential* to
compete with the Nerds for the ACC Title, but realistically they're the
favorites and we'll be battling with the mega-talented Demon Deacons
for 2nd. I'd think we have the *potential* to be a Top 10 team; the
*potential* to do well in the post-season (as we've typically done);
the *potential* even to reach the Final 4.
Alas though, *potential* is the key, cause we're gonna be very, very
young, with only 1 senior on the whole squad. Should be fun watching
Dean develop 'em though.
- ACC Chris
|
15.313 | | COMET::JOHNSTON | Stand Back! I'll handle this! | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:24 | 9 |
| Depending on next year's recruiting, I think Indiana could be projected
a #1 in two to three years.
I would guess next year they would be projected, on the basis of Bob's
excellent coaching, to be ranked at 4th or 5th, when in reality, on the
basis of pure talent, age, and experience, they more fairly would
expect to be ranked in the 18 to 24 range.
Mike JN
|
15.314 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:27 | 10 |
|
> Ha ha! Good one glenn. Imagine trying to accuse the media of *under*
> valuing Carolina's team in a given year! Haw haw!!!
Huh? I was talking about *you*, not the media. You said Indiana
should be #2. Considering their performances this past year, why
should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
glenn
|
15.315 | All "supposed to's" are bull | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Let Sununu hitchhike! | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:34 | 15 |
| >Considering their performances this past year, why
>should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
Let's see. They both sort of won their conference title. They both
lost to the same team in the NCAA tournement. They both have recently
had the best recruiting year in the country, only Bob's is a year
older. Besides, Bob has HS Player of the Decade, Damon Bailey and Mr.
Indiana (or is it Mr. Illinois) Eric Anderson as a senior. To counter,
Dean has Lynch and Davis as significant non-great recruiting class
players. Oops, Bob snuck in the frosh wide body sky scraping stud,
Henderson.
Dan
|
15.316 | Bye, bye clangers; hello swishers | SHALOT::HUNT | If Do Then Damned Else Damned | Mon Apr 22 1991 18:52 | 8 |
| Why of course Carolina will be better ... They just said sayonara to
three seniors who picked up their masonry degrees by shooting a
collective 8-for-36 in their choke job to the Jayhawks.
Hey, I'd be looking better, too, if I jettisoned that kind of
"baggage".
Bob Hunt
|
15.317 | From ACCrisp's own mouth last year.... | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Mon Apr 22 1991 19:20 | 10 |
|
Don't forget...
This is year #2 for the greatest freshman class of all time......
Only 3 more shots at the title.
Metz
|
15.318 | I might've called it Dean's best, but never 'Best Ever'. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Apr 22 1991 22:51 | 12 |
| Firstly Mr.Metz, *I* never labeled them the greatest freshman class of
all time. *Those* unfair expectations were placed by the media. (BTW,
they're saying the same thing about the awesome bench coming into
Michigan this year. Every year somebody's got 'The Greatest Recruits
Ever.' That's what *sells, main!)
Having said that I'll go on and say this crew is 1-for-1 in ACC
Championships; 1-for-1 in Final 4 appearances; 1-for-1 in *TWENTY-NINE*
win seasons. (That's alot, folks.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.319 | Gotta "snuff" out these Excellent Loss weeds | SHALOT::HUNT | If Do Then Damned Else Damned | Tue Apr 23 1991 00:02 | 9 |
| � Having said that I'll go on and say this crew is 1-for-1 in ACC
� Championships; 1-for-1 in Final 4 appearances; 1-for-1 in *TWENTY-NINE*
� win seasons. (That's alot, folks.)
And it was 0-for-1 in *THIRTY* win seasons. And it was 0-for-2 in
games with *REAL* meaning against its' archrival, the national
champion Duke Blue Devils. (That's not enough, folks.)
Bob Hunt
|
15.320 | | JUPITR::PARTEE | Charlie -- Lemieux est le mieux | Tue Apr 23 1991 06:46 | 11 |
| >RHETT::KNORR "Carolina Blue" 12 lines 22-APR-1991 21:51
> -< I might've called it Dean's best, but never 'Best Ever'. >-
I stay the hell out of this debate (although my expert hoops knowledge
tells me that Knight is the better coach) because I couldn't care less,
but damn, I would have sworn on a witness stand (whether facing a
chain-smoking defense attorney or not) that you called it the greatest
freshman class ever, ACChris.
Charlie
|
15.321 | Mourning returns with a vengence HOYAS #1!!!!!!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | When it matters, Dean never wins | Tue Apr 23 1991 10:24 | 8 |
|
Yeah Dan but Deano already has that widebody stud Eric Montross sitting there
with a year's experience under his belt. You know the guy Smitty benched
cause he was doing too much to control the Kansas game and we couldn't have
a freshman upstaging the seniors now could we?? hee haw!!!!!!!!!!!
mike
|
15.322 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Tue Apr 23 1991 12:02 | 5 |
| Ah yes, and Chris retreats back to his old arguement - blame the media.
I love it. The media has caused all of Dean's woes....
JD
|
15.323 | Indiana'll be about the 7th best next year... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 12:37 | 50 |
|
>>should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
> Let's see. They both sort of won their conference title.
Except the Big10 was its weakest ever while the Almost Close was the
nation's best...
> They both lost to the same team in the NCAA tournement.
Is there a point here?...
> They both have recently had the best recruiting year in the country,
Dan-the-inveterate-fibber just cain't bring himself to tale the whole
Truth and go on to mention "... but Indiana's was rated 7th best until
they signed Funderburke, who subsequently left, so what I'm really trying
to say here is that Indiana had the 7th best recruiting year in the country
but I just cain't bring myself to tell the truth in this matter..."
> Bob has HS Player of the Decade, Damon Bailey and
So, you're saying that Damon Bailey is the best player to come out of high
school in the past ten years? I dunno, but if *I* were gonna give out that
honor I'd be looking at David Robinson, Shaquille O'Neal, Shawn Kemp, or
about 125 players before Damon. What Damon is is the most hyped player of
the decade, benefiting from being white and, most of all, embodying the very
character of the romanticized shooting star in the movie "Hoosiers."
> Mr. Indiana (or is it Mr. Illinois) Eric Anderson as a senior.
Mr. Illinois. He's from Chicago. It'll be nice to see Eric for the first
time playing power forward instead of weak center, but based on reports his
chronic back problem (he could barely move in the tournament) might see him
undergoing surgery and going red shirt next year.
> Bob snuck in the frosh wide body sky scraping stud, Henderson.
Henderson is anything but that. He's a_extremely skinny finesse player whose
game reminds me a lotta Ralph Sampson. And since when is 6-10 "sky scraping?"
Truth is, Bob will for the first time have all the cards up front, with Eric
and Calbert joined by Todd Lindemann (7-1) and Brian Evans (6-7 widebody) in
addition to Pat Graham at small forward (he's really a guard) and the two
stiffs Lawson and Nover for pick-meat. More important, he'll finally have a
team that cain rebound and, gasp!, block and/or intimidate shots!
No more 3-guard or 4-guard lineups!!
Big10 Tom
|
15.324 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Tue Apr 23 1991 12:45 | 10 |
| To back up MrT - Indiana's recruiting class was ranked high - due to
Funderburke being a member of it. W/O him, it dropped.
No way, no way is Damon Bailey the best H.S. player of the decade -
unless you are talking the 1890's. That's a NO-BRAINER. Mr. T starts
a list of better H.S. players (The Shack comes to mind right away...)
They should have a damn good team over the nexted few years.
JD
|
15.325 | Just an observation ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:23 | 8 |
| Interesting that JD sees fit to evaluate HS players based on their
eventual performance when it comes to Indiana, but when critiquing
Carolina all we hear about are all of Dean's HS All-Americans.
:^(
- ACC Chris
|
15.326 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:38 | 18 |
| Where's your beef? Indiana players traditionally have been lower
rated outta high school than the Star Heels, and ultimately the
Star Heels end up glutting the NBA while one or two Hoosiers moon
about here and there on the end a benches.
No way in HAIL that Damon Bailey is the best H.S. player of the past
ten years. He's a nice little guard, not too quick not too strong,
not the greatest shooter, but a great passer who plays a mistake-free
floor game.
Input or output, the 'Snuffer ends up the loser on the "G" string.
As for the comparo between the Hoosiers and the Blews, one need only
point out that Bob will have Lindemann in the middle cuz the guy he
wanted will be centermain for the team from Chapel Hell.
Big10 Tom
|
15.327 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 14:47 | 8 |
| Lost in the shuffle is "coach" Steve Fisher's first monster recruiting
class, called by Bob Gibbon as even better than last year's harvest
by North Carolina. At the haid a this group is Chris Webber, who
apparently is a monster widebody. Then they got this kid from Texas
who cain sky, David Thompson-style. They let Voshon Leonard slip away
to Minnesota, but overall had a killer recruiting class.
Big10 Tom
|
15.328 | Fairness in analysis is all I'm looking for. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:10 | 16 |
| My beefs with JD's Thypocritical analysis, not with Bob's failure to
develop HS talent into NBA breadwinners.
When evaluating IU HS talent he compares them with what they achieved
post-HS. (A correct approach.)
When evaluating Dean Smith and UNC he moans about all our "HS
All-America's, regardless of how they did post-HS. (An incorrect
approach.)
Damon Bailey was a great HS player. King Rice was a great HS player.
Michael Jordan was a great HS player. Doesn't make them defacto
collegiate All-Americans though ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.329 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:38 | 18 |
| >Bob's failure to develop HS talent into NBA breadwinners.
Bob has had no such failure. His failure has been failing to recruit
future NBA breadwinners. The good players he's had outta HS (Isiah,
Wittman, et al) did quite well in the NBA. He also got several players
in the NBA who otherwise never woulda been there (Steve Alford for one).
JD's not being hypocritical at all. He's simply disagreeing with the
rating given Damon OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL by many. That's a widespread
sentiment, especially after Damon got the ball stuffed down his throat
several times at the McDonald's All Star game. Damon's a decent recruit,
one projected after being seen in person as a "future solid player."
This does not put him in the class of Michael or Sam or Shack or Mr.
Robinson. And as such the onus cain't be put on to Bob as if he were
in that same class.
MrT
|
15.330 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:42 | 13 |
| I agree with JD's judgement of Damon. Trouble is everytime I try to
mention the fact that King Rice maybe wasn't the most talented kid in
the universe I get "But he was a McDonald's All-American - Dean's
wasting great talent." stuffed down my throat.
The fact is you can't judge players out of HS and, as a result, you
can't use the argument that "X coach gets HS All-Americans every year
so X coach outa win more Titles."
Doesn't wash, and Damon is a prime example of why.
- ACC Chris
|
15.331 | Bob H, intellectually dishonest, wasn't it? | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Let Sununu hitchhike! | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:46 | 23 |
| >To back up MrT - Indiana's recruiting class was ranked high - due to
>Funderburke being a member of it. W/O him, it dropped.
I'm sure you'd all line up on Dean's side, say, if he ran Montross off
his team, then prevented him from attending the college of his choice.
Sure you would.
But in this twisted sports commentary we participate in, where
poor-mouthing your favorite team stands alone in the pantheon of
achievements, the Funderburke fiasco has actually turned into a feather
in Bob's cap. By the way, the Best in the Country recruiting class for
IU in '89 did count Fenderburke, but didn't count Cheaney. Seems to me
that he more than makes up the difference. He'll probably be
pre-season All America, despite the fact that MrT whines that this
prototype college quick forward belongs at the off guard! Maybe in the
NBA, but at very few college programs, but than that's just part of the
coin of the soft soap peddling, isn't it?
>No way, no way is Damon Bailey the best H.S. player of the decade -
He won the award. The others didn't.
Dan
|
15.332 | | DECWET::METZGER | There's a jar with your name on it. | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:49 | 14 |
|
Chris,
I don't have the time to go back through all the old sports notes so I'll leave
it at this. If you didn't call Dean's freshman class the greatest of all time
you certainly expressed great joy in the news medias assesment of it as such.
In fact I bet you used the quote from the papers several times in describing
this class. I even made it a point last year to ask you if after 4 years this
class failed to win the big enchilada if you would consider Dean an
underachiever ?
Metz
|
15.333 | Webber = power forwards stud. Needs discipline | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Let Sununu hitchhike! | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:52 | 16 |
| >At the haid a this group is Chris Webber, who
>apparently is a monster widebody.
I saw him play some in one of those All Star games ESPN telecasts. It
was tough to make any judgements because it was very play ground. Most
times, the big guys would haul down a rebound and then set off down
court with it and pull up for a 20 foot J, Webber doing this frequently.
All you could really see was the athleticism, and it was there in
abundance.
Travis Best looked very good to me running the offense (when the
centers and forwards let him). I think Tech will appreciate him
relative to Anderson as he seems to understand there's four teammates
on the floor with him.
Dan
|
15.334 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 15:54 | 15 |
| >didn't count Cheaney.
Yes it did. Cheaney was accounted for in the rating of that
particular recruiting class.
As for Funderburke, he was thrown off his HS team for behavioral
problems, and offered himself to Bob (Bob didn't go to him) saying
that what he needed was discipline. Most everybody (including
Lawrence's HS coach, MrT, and Doug Ross) predicted he'd be off the
Indiana team within a season and they were right. That's not "a
feather in Bob's cap," it's only a simple, plain fact that you couldn't
bring yourself to recognize in your statement what you already knew.
Big10 Tom
|
15.335 | I was hoping for a few years of IU probation! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:02 | 9 |
| > offered himself to Bob (Bob didn't go to him) saying that what he
> needed was discipline.
An interesting analysis, especially considering the hot water IU nearly
found themselves in regarding charges of Bob's assistant coaches
illegally tampering with Funderburke.
- ACC Chris
|
15.336 | At least cancels out the poor mouthing over Funderburke | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Let Sununu hitchhike! | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:28 | 11 |
| >Yes it did. Cheaney was accounted for in the rating of that
>particular recruiting class.
He wasn't in that the strength of that recruiting class was the 4 or 5
top 50 high schoolers. Cheaney was not among them. He was a sleeper, a
plum.
Bob's failure with Funderburke notwithstanding, Cheaney more than makes
up for it.
Dan
|
15.337 | wrong... and wrong | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:55 | 11 |
| Again, you're wrong on both points. Cheaney was ranked in the top
50 - all of them were except for the stiff redhaid Lawson. From
memory, Cheaney was somewhere down in the high 30s or low 40s.
And it's doubtful, on a team forced to play 3- or even 4-guard
lineups that Cheaney's scoring (he's still learning how to play the
boards and inside D) "more than makes up for" a star stud middlemain
who cain block shots, monster the boards, and score at will from the
inside.
Big10 Tom
|
15.338 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:59 | 18 |
| >interesting analysis, especially considering the hot water IU
>nearly found themselves in regarding charges of Bob's assistant
>coaches illegally tampering with Funderburke.
Ahhh, classic Indiana recruting scandal: A competitor school
levels the charge that the recruit HAD A_ILLEGAL PHONE CALL PLACED
to him to verify whether he still intended to sign the following
week.
That's why it was a class act for Bob to force ThunderBurpe to
make good on his minimum academic committment to the school and
finish his freshmain credits: A troubled kid who himself admitted
to having everything handed him cuz a his hoops prowess needs to
learn that the game is a two-way street. One cain only sigh in
resignation that it'll be a competitor school that reaps the benefit
from this fine lesson.
Big10 Tom
|
15.339 | Bob loosens the reigns, perhaps to stay competitive? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:04 | 16 |
| > Ahhh, classic Indiana recruting scandal: A competitor school
> levels the charge ...
Apparently IU's not the only school to get turned in by a competitor.
Iowa turned in Big10 bro Illinois, which then landed into the
equivalent of the NCAA's Big House. Haw!
Bottom line #1: Just cause somebody turned you in doesn't mean
you're innocent.
Bottom line #2: Indiana wanted Thunderburke *badly* cause he was
a big time player. (Top 5 in USA, as his early
season play at IU attested to.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.340 | Clarification | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:48 | 14 |
| Chris,
YOu totally misinterpreted me. Dan made some ermark about Damon Bailey
being the H.S. Player of the Decade. I simply said there is no way in
hell that Bailey was the player of the decade. However, just like the
Star Heels, Bailey is a H.S. All-American. Just like them. I don't
make any differences. Dean happens to have 12 of em all the time.
And does virtually nothing with them.
As for the recruiting class, I read that Bob's class was devalued after
initial reports. Nothing more than that. It still was a darn good one
- but inferior to last year's haul by the Tarhells.
JD
|
15.341 | I'm asking the obvious, I realize ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:52 | 8 |
| > Dean happens to have 12 of em all the time. And does virtually
> nothing with them.
Is it safe to assume, JD, that "virtually nothing" is your definition
of failing to win a Title?
- ACC Chris
|
15.342 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Tue Apr 23 1991 17:55 | 9 |
| >Indiana wanted Thunderburke *badly* cuz he was a top 5 player...
He was the top player, period, in the ratings I saw. And, sure,
the Hoosiers wanted him badly. But, ThunderBurpe approached the
Hoosiers. We never go after a superstar stud big guy, cuz we know
that they'll never come to a place where the work ethic is high
and the pay is low ($0.00 per hr.).
MrT
|
15.343 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Tue Apr 23 1991 18:00 | 15 |
|
Just adding facts, go about your regular business....
Ranking of IU's freshman class:
1. Funderburke
2. P. Graham
3. G. Graham
4. C Cheaney
5. C. Reynolds
6. C. Lawson
The first 5 were top 50 selections....
Source: Street + Smiths
|
15.344 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | New Squids on the Block | Tue Apr 23 1991 18:01 | 12 |
| Chris,
Yep, failing to win a titile, despite yearly overwhelming talent.
Also, Dean and Bob have great framework right now to build a
champeenship team. I'd expect to see a champeenship banner hanging
from the rafters of one of em by the end of 94. How's that.
And Dan, if Montross was kicked off of UNC's incoming class, then they
wouldn't have had the 'greatest recruiting class' ever. how's that.
JD
|
15.345 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | I'm having an old friend for dinner... | Tue Apr 23 1991 19:17 | 17 |
|
re .342
> We never go after a superstar stud big guy, cuz we know
> that they'll never come to a place where the work ethic is high
> and the pay is low ($0.00 per hr.).
Yeah, like Moruning, Ferry, Ewing, Worthy, Lattner, Daugherty, and
about ten dozen other big men ?
Fack is T, is that Knight is inflexible and incapable of recruiting big
men if they threw themselves at his feet.
You're sounding more like Chris everyday. Stop making excuses and tell
Da Troof !
The Doc
|
15.346 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Wed Apr 24 1991 12:06 | 54 |
| >You're sounding more Chris everyday...
Ouch! Main, that really hurt, Doc. You reely go straight for
the 'nads. Ok ok, I was jest baiting him a beat, but, remembering
that Bob - wisely or otherwise - restricts his recruiting more or
less to the core midwest region, from memory here are a couple a
big men Bob didn't git and why:
- Deon Thomas, demanded big cash, turned away by Bob, paid $80,000
plus perks by "coach" Lou Hitsome.
- Sean Kemp, told Bob that he needed "many tens of thousands" and
was turned away only to fall into the clutches of the infamous
scumbag (and latter-day ESPN victim-hero) Eddie Sutton.
The stories go on. I've long felt that Bob needs to go national as
his competition did a long time ago. But he's a traditionalist, and
has a team dominated not only by kids from the neighborhood but indeed
by Hoosier homies. Cain't git away with that anymore, not when the
big-time recruiters ('Snuffy, Heathcoate, Fisher, Pitino, and many
others) recruit on your home turf. This is especially true with the
quality big men, who of course are as rare as hen's teef'.
>quit making excuses...
Again must I point out to you that in Bob's case no excuses are
necessary, not even on "G"-string issues? You persist in confusing
input issues with output issues. Sure Bob's a lousy recruiter, in
part cuz he consciously limits himself. But when you're on top on
the output side nothing need be explained when you've won nearly half
your conference Titles (we have real Titles out here, btw) and have
been inducted into the Pantheon for winning you-know-what 3 times.
re: Cap
Thank you thank you, but it's a given that factual reality won't make
a dent in our egomaniacal friend's armor-plated tongue. Funny, but
it's hard to imagine either Graham bro being that highly rated. I
like them both (especially Gregg), but both have limitations. Pat's
got a SEVERE case of WMD, but is gutsy and now that he's found his
shot again will really help. Gregg has never been a good J-shooter,
a real failing for a_off guard. He has all the physical talents,
though, he's very explosive off the floor. I saw him put down a
slam in the faces of Minnesota's two big guys and they looked
helpless in 1-on-2.
Calbert needs to continue improving his floor game. His defense and
rebounding cain be awful at times, but Bob's unrelenting instruction
has gotten him nearly consistent... so long as things are going ok
with the whole team. He cain disappear on the defensive end when
things've gone awry for the squad, leaving only out-of-position Eric
to lead.
Big10 Tom
|
15.347 | New Logo | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Wed May 01 1991 14:01 | 8 |
| The Big10 unveiled its new logo yesterday. Purty slick, it's a
block lettered BIG TEN... with the number "11" delineated in the
background bracketing the "E."
It was designed by a grad student in fine arts and the University
a Northern Illinois, a MidContinent Conference.
Big10 Tom
|
15.348 | Ah, the advantages of not locking yourself in with numbers... | RHETT::KNORR | ACC: Conference of the 90's | Wed May 01 1991 14:14 | 9 |
| Granted I don't have my PhD in mafematics, but could someone please
explain to me (either verbally or via some presumably complex equation)
the significance of the "TEN" in "BIG TEN", given that there's eleven
(11) teams in the conference.
Thankee.
- ACC Chris
|
15.349 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | I need some sensible shorts | Wed May 01 1991 14:19 | 8 |
|
The Big 11 has a 10 in it for the same reasons the Lakers play nowhere
a lake, and the Utah team plays in the jazz capitol of the world.
Dickstah
P.S. The Red Sox don't wear red socks either, just red stirrups.
|
15.350 | virtually 10 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Wed May 01 1991 14:23 | 9 |
| > Big10 Tom
Shouldn't that be BIG TEN Tom?
It's interesting the it's blue and white, the Penn State colors. And my
first impression was to warn Northwestern to watch out. Maybe the big
plan is to edge them out and go back to a real 10 team conference.
TTom
|
15.351 | All hail Penn State! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed May 01 1991 14:27 | 12 |
|
> It's interesting the it's blue and white, the Penn State colors. And my
> first impression was to warn Northwestern to watch out. Maybe the big
> plan is to edge them out and go back to a real 10 team conference.
I really see no good reason to continue this myth that Northwestern
is actually a part of the Big Ten. At this point, I think they
probably qualify under MrT's criteria as one of them moochy-mooch
welfare-state schools...
glenn
|
15.352 | There really *is* an answer! | RHETT::KNORR | ACC: Conference of the 90's | Wed May 01 1991 14:55 | 6 |
| Yea, that's the ticket, TTom. There's only enough physical space for
TEN teams, but thanks to good ole virtual memory a very large number of
teams could be added without changing the conference name!
- ACC Chris
|
15.353 | Northwestern suporter | NEMAIL::LEARYM | | Wed May 01 1991 15:53 | 13 |
| Don't think that Northwestern would be a-bounced from the Big Ten.
It is a vital asset to the Big Ten academically. I think it is head and
shoulders above the rest of the Big Ten academically (with the
exception of Michigan overall and Purdue in some specialized areas).
Just a couple of observations. I'm not overly familiar with the Big
ten, only having been geographically close to some of the schools (ND)
and knowing a bunch of people who went to some of the state schools
out there. Perhaps someone a little closer to the conf (MrT ?) could
expand.
MikeL
|
15.354 | | LUNER::BROOKS | I saw Marvin Gaye yesterday ... | Wed May 01 1991 16:15 | 2 |
| T isn't that close to the Big 10 - he just stays within rollerblade
striking distance, if you know what I mean ....
|
15.355 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Wed May 01 1991 17:32 | 23 |
| >I think it is head and shoulders above the rest of Big Ten
>academically
Here we go again. Harking back to Dan's caste bilge... "a place
to meet future business associates" ... "find a wife" ... and so
forth.
Fact is, small private colleges, with major exceptions such as
MIT, Caltech, Carnegie-Mellon, pedal exclusivity more than academic
excellence, with people slavering over as gene-pool schools. The
University of Minnesota alone could swallow all of NU into its
School of Engineering.
Northwestern and other schools like it serve primarily as a place
for rich kids to go and get their MBAs and law degrees. Who needs
'em? Wisconsin, for instance, is a much heavier academic environment
overall.
If NU left the Big10 they wouldn't be missed, especially entering an
era where science and engineering have taken a position of predominant
importance.
Big10 Tom
|
15.356 | | BUDDUA::WASKOM | | Wed May 01 1991 18:14 | 29 |
| Northwestern has one of the top 10 rated business schools in the
country, outstanding legal and medical schools, and a very well
regarded school of engineering. I believe that their journalism
program is one of the top 10 in the country, along with an outstanding
drama department and strong liberal arts programs. They do not have an
agriculture program, nor a home economics program - both of which were
listed at Purdue as required departments for a land grant university
when I was attending there. I don't remember there being a major
available in Phys Ed, either. (I grew up within 10 miles of Northwestern,
did some high school programs there, and have investigated it as a
potential school for my son.)
I don't believe that you will see Northwestern leave the Big Ten, in
spite of their perenniel underdog status in the major team sports. To
the best of my knowledge, which includes personal friendship with
alumni recruiters/interviewers for the university, they do "needs
blind" admission, and have very few students who are unable to attend
for financial reasons -- ie, they have a great financial aid endowment
available to put together packages for their students. They emphasize
academic performance and leadership potential as their criteria for
admittance - in that order. Academics come first there, and it's an
example that I wish more schools would follow.
The Big Ten is about more than sports, although that's all that we ever
hear about in the press. Northwestern more than carries its weight in
the academic, research, and administrative areas that constitute the
other venues of conference interest.
A&W
|
15.357 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 00:11 | 26 |
| Be that as it may, the statement was thatNU is head and shoulders
ave the rest of the Bigbovg10 academically, which is a_ignorant
statement. In a recent magazine ranking (and granted they're
flawed) the other 9 Big10 schools were plastered all over the top
listings in various areas - some more so than NU.
It's an old saw that private schools are automatically better, a
natural reaction to the attractiveness of the exclusivity involved.
As r "needs blind" admission, wanna bet whetNU's demographics
blow out those of the 9 state schools?
Fact is that top state schools compare faorably. The Big10 happens
to have a fairlheavy lineup of fine state schools. Buoth there are
many others (Berkeley, Penn State,arolina, UCLA, Washington, etc.)
It's simple east coast provincialism that brings out this crap that
thtoprivate schools blow out the top state schools. Out there,
maybe, but not west of tppalachians.
I'm not putting down NU. I'm just pointing out some convenient
myths and the reasons for them. Private schools are a collection
of core departments devoid of the ancillary departments/schools
that stateuniversities are chartered to run. If one's talking
academic excellence, the core dept./schools of the two groups is
the only fair comparison.
MrT
|
15.358 | lacking something | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu May 02 1991 09:09 | 11 |
| Academic ratings notwithstanding, I see no reason why Northwestern can't
be competitive in major athletics.
Duke does it. Stanford does it. Hell, Rice looked good lasted year in
football.
Maybe it's part of the "Northwestern Is Better" mystique to have lousy
basketball and football teams. To that extent, Northwestern lowers the
prestige of the BIG T1E1N.
TTom
|
15.359 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu May 02 1991 09:54 | 19 |
| The anti-public college and university chauvinism is killing the
University of Massachusetts and the state college system around here.
The attitude is and always has been "why have a public college and
university system when we have the greatest private colleges and
universities in the world?" Making matters even worse is that
virtually no one in state government is a product of our state schools.
The ones who aren't part of the Boston College old-boy network (or even
better, Triple Eagles, those who went to Boston College High School,
then Boston College then Boston College Law School) are from the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. We also have John Silber,
President of Boston University, lobbying to keep certain programs out
of the state system because they'll compete with his programs at BU.
Of course, this state is such a f**ked up mess right now that maybe it
needs its graduates of state colleges and universities to straighten it
out.
John
|
15.360 | Buy them out, whatever; the games just aren't funny anymore... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu May 02 1991 10:21 | 16 |
|
Northwestern's academic quality had absolutely nothing to do with my
statements. They simply come nowhere near a minimal standard of
competition on the gridiron or on the hardcourt, and as was
suggested, I think they almost enjoy that fact. If they want to
remain in the alliance in areas where they're competitive, both
academically and athletically, I would have no problem with that.
But at their near 1-AA status in both these major revenue sports,
their participation is a joke. I don't expect that fact to be
recognized by the sports media if this subject ever seriously comes
up within the Big Ten, though. Rather, I'm sure we'll be hearing
the usual money-first, greed-in-sports angle even when it doesn't
apply here.
glenn
|
15.361 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 10:41 | 14 |
| It's much easier for a private school to suceed at hoops than
football cuz a the size of grid squads. Apart from SoCal and
Notre Dame, I'd guess Stanford does about the best, and they're
seldom at the upper echelon of the Pac10 (do they *really* only
care about the Cal game?). I'm not sure whether Pitt is public
or private.
A real disappointment has been Foster's effort with the Mildcats.
He seemed to have them positioned to break through, then, year
before last, everybody transferred out for some unknown reason.
Big10 Tom
|
15.362 | | SACT41::ROSS | I got me some Pumps! | Thu May 02 1991 11:07 | 5 |
| It's too bad the Big 10 couldn't buy out Northwestern to get them to leave
the Big 10. A swap out with Penn State would have made the most sense...
Continue to give NW a cut of the revenues, but let them seek a more
competitive league.
|
15.363 | The REAL school in Pittsburgh is Carnegie-Mellon | SHALOT::MEDVID | could not hear or see for jealousy | Thu May 02 1991 12:32 | 5 |
| Pitt is a public school. Relatively cheap tuition for in-staters.
Isn't Clemson a private school? If so, there's one for your list, T.
--dan'l
|
15.364 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 12:55 | 3 |
| Yeah, Dan'l, but Clemson's special: They cheat like crazy.
MrT
|
15.365 | | CAM::WAY | That mean mannish boy.... | Thu May 02 1991 12:59 | 2 |
| I can't for the life of me figure out why, but for some reason
Carnegie-Mellon University always makes me think of Busty Heart.....
|
15.366 | Still got that chip on your shoulder, MrT? | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Sununu escaped from Animal Farm | Thu May 02 1991 13:00 | 20 |
| >Here we go again. Harking back to Dan's caste bilge...
There was no "caste bilge" in any of my notes. And, as a matter of
fact, when MrT made an issue implying racial inequity at the superior
private schools relative to the state school that he was promoting, I
went and looked it up. In fact, he was dead wrong.
People have to determine this issue for themselves. If you're
interested talk to educational counselors, go to the library or
bookstore and find books which discuss programs offered at each, talk
to heads of businesses and find out where they get the best people
from. Try to determine which schools accept the brightest students,
which have the lowest student-teacher ratios.
After examining all these factors, and certainly more, the answers
become very clear. Nothing to do with race, nothing to do with caste,
nothing to do with gene-pool. Everything to do with quality of
education, quality of student and the future.
Dan
|
15.367 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 13:12 | 12 |
| >I went and looked it up. In fact, he was dead wrong.
Total bull. Another Dan-fib. You never submitted any sources
on that one. Fact is, beyond the programs to bring in the tokens,
private schools are populated by whiter richers students. Suggestion
otherwise is total unmitigated bullshit. Of course, in the technical
schools (like Stanford) most of the grad students seem to be oriental,
but the same holds in the public grad schools. :^)
And no, no chip on my shoulder, just clearing up the ridiculous
statement about NU being "head and shoulders" above the rest of
the conference.
|
15.368 | *Gigantic* chip on MrT's shoulder | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Sununu escaped from Animal Farm | Thu May 02 1991 13:19 | 15 |
| >Total bull. Another Dan-fib. You never submitted any sources
>on that one. Fact is, beyond the programs to bring in the tokens,
>private schools are populated by whiter richers students.
It's so nice to see you make something like this up.
THere are no disclaimers about these alleged "token programs", but I
invite anyone who is interested in the issue to troop on down to a book
store, and just browse through college and/or grad school catalogs.
They break down minority students for you there, and you'll see the
truth for yourself.
It certainly wasn't in 15.367.
Dan
|
15.369 | 'All Men Are Created Equal' not a motto the Ivies live by... | RHETT::KNORR | ACC: Conference of the 90's | Thu May 02 1991 13:36 | 10 |
| The 'gene pool' argument has some merit, when you consider that alums
of the big-money private schools (and big-time donors, no doubt) are
virtually guaranteed assurance their son/daughter will be granted
admission, regardless of qualification.
The slot this person takes will no doubt take away a position of a more
qualified applicant.
- ACC Chris
|
15.370 | | CAM::WAY | That mean mannish boy.... | Thu May 02 1991 13:40 | 6 |
| Dan and MrT:
The Ali-Norton of SPORTS
8^)
|
15.371 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 13:44 | 15 |
| >After examining all these factors, and certainly more, the answers
>become very clear.
Only if you compare the top private schools to all state schools.
If you compared top vs. top, the answer, of course, wouldn't be so
clear at all. And if you compared all vs. all, the private schools
would lose out very badly, for the majority of pud schools in this
country are private schools, the ones you never hear about, from
Air or anybody else. This comparison would be even starker if one
looked at out-of-state applicant criteria. Ftm, if you look at
out-of-state tuitions of the better state schools they look a helluva
lot like the better private schools.
MrT
|
15.372 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Mandingo | Thu May 02 1991 13:46 | 13 |
| >Dan and MrT:
>
> The Ali-Norton of SPORTS
Good one, Frankie. Air of course would play the role of Ken Norton,
the main who abstained from sex months prior to a fight to get psyched
up, the main who put form over function... the main who led with his
chin.
This is why I use the p_name Mandingo. To honor Air, for Ken played
the rebellious slave in that fine but forgotten work a art.
MrT
|
15.373 | | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Sununu escaped from Animal Farm | Thu May 02 1991 13:51 | 19 |
| >The 'gene pool' argument has some merit, when you consider that alums
>of the big-money private schools (and big-time donors, no doubt) are
>virtually guaranteed assurance their son/daughter will be granted
>admission, regardless of qualification.
When you consider that the same is true of virtually any school, the
'gene pool' argument has no merit.
BTW, the Kellogg School, Northwestern's b-school, is again the top
rated business school in the country from Business Week's annual
survey. Other reports have it very high as well (some first), and it
easily outdistances the rest of the Big 10, though Michigan puts in a
strong showing, and Indiana gets a mention here or there.
There is no need to support the argument that Northwestern doesn't
compete athletically with the rest of the conference, and this does
support the non-T arguments about its academics.
Dan
|
15.374 | These people go on to lead companies, people. | RHETT::KNORR | ACC: Conference of the 90's | Thu May 02 1991 14:01 | 18 |
| > When you consider that the same is true of virtually any school,
> the 'gene pool' argument has no merit.
If you're right (and you very well may be) I'd agree with you, *for the
purposes of this discussion*. (i.e. private vs. public schools)
In the larger sense I find the concept of Muffy and Biff getting into
'Name your Big Time School' cause of mommy and daddy's bucks a
sickening thing indeed.
What makes it worse at a private school is that *usually* it's harder
to get admitted to these schools but, once you're in, a very high
number graduate. Other schools (Georgia Tech is one) will admit alot
of people, but actually getting your degree ('specially engineering) is
*extremely* difficult. (Usually takes 5 years @ Tech.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.375 | | 7221::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu May 02 1991 14:12 | 5 |
| Most schools have engineering programs that last 5 years.
Clemson is a state school.
John
|
15.376 | | SACT41::ROSS | I got me some Pumps! | Thu May 02 1991 14:14 | 4 |
| >Dan and MrT:
> The Ali-Norton of SPORTS
That would be Ali McGraw and Ed Norton, right?
|
15.377 | MrT can't seem to handle the truth | VAXWRK::SCHNEIDER | Sununu escaped from Animal Farm | Thu May 02 1991 15:22 | 7 |
| >If you compared top vs. top, the answer, of course, wouldn't be so
>clear at all.
I was speaking of comparing the top to the top. The answers from the
assembled data are very clear.
Dan
|
15.378 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | | Thu May 02 1991 16:50 | 7 |
| That's not so at all, Ken. Half the names on the various lists
are state universities. Also, analyses of entrants into the
prestige grad programs show that grads of the better state
schools fare very well. So much for your theory that the elites
predominately come from private ones.
MrT
|
15.379 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri May 31 1991 13:04 | 9 |
| The Minnesota Golden Gophers' recruiting class ended up ranked
9th in the nation thanx to the recruitment a 6-6 Voshon Lenard
outta De-troit. Michigan's class is ranked No. 1 in the nation.
Indiana may be shopping for another big main now that the under-
talented redhaid Crhis Lawson has gone to Vandy. One wonders
where Purdue's class is ranked having recruited Glen Robinson,
who may turn out to be the best player of the whole group.
Big10 Tom
|
15.380 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Ayrton Senna, show us I dare ya | Mon Jul 08 1991 13:38 | 14 |
| Gophers' class was ranked 19th by Future Stars, a scouting service
out of Iowa. Small forward Voshon Leonard was top10, Minnesota
also got a big guard and long range shooter outta Martinsville
Indiana (forget his name). Bob rues not having gone after him, but
there is no room for another guard on his squad. The Golden Goofs
tapped another top20 type in Jayson Walton, a jumping jack outta
Dallas.
Nuclear widebody stud and Purdue recruit Glenn Robinson failed to
score well enough on his SATs to play this year, he'll go Prop 48
or whatever it is now. To a_Indiana fan this ain't necessarily the
most heartbreaking news...
Big Big10 Tom
|
15.381 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Jul 22 1991 13:43 | 7 |
| This note is just to extend, from the Big10 corner, our heartfelt
thanks to those ACC men who participated in the recent co-op
victory in the Snuffy Smif' debate.
Kudos, gents!
Big10 Tom
|
15.382 | So much for Bob's alleged talent woes ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:19 | 5 |
| "It would be great to coach like Bob Knight at Indiana and play nothing
but man-to-man - as long as you can be as sure as he is that you'll
have the athletes to do it year in and year out."
- Pat Kennedy, hoops coach of the ACC's Florida State Seminoles
|
15.383 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:23 | 10 |
| >
> "It would be great to coach like Bob Knight at Indiana and play nothing
> but man-to-man - as long as you can be as sure as he is that you'll
> have the athletes to do it year in and year out."
>
> - Pat Kennedy, hoops coach of the ACC's Florida State Seminoles
Sounds like another ACC Coach working up to have a reason for a_excellent
loss......
|
15.384 | locked up | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:26 | 11 |
| Hold on there, Saw.
There is one team in the ACC that reveres and practices the art of the
excellent loss and that team is the No Carolina Tar Heels. It has taken
that program 30+ years to perfect it and they are not about to let anyone
else get in on that plan without a fight.
Up with excellent losses! Down with Champeenship type end of season
peaks! Go Slasher!
TTom
|
15.385 | Man-to-man needs lung capacity and focus | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:33 | 13 |
| It doesn't take an abundance of God-given basketball *talent* to play
man-to-man defense.
On the contrary, man-to-man is a very simple defense to play on the
chalkboard. What it takes on the court are extremely well-conditioned
and well-coached players. Knight's players have *rarely* ever lacked
those characteristics.
Conditioning and discipline are separate from talent. Always have been.
Mark Aguirre at DePaul was a prime example of this simple but elegant
truth.
Bob Hunt
|
15.386 | All the guts in the world won't make up for slow feet | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:41 | 21 |
| > It doesn't take an abundance of God-given basketball *talent* to play
> man-to-man defense.
Apparently you're in direct disagreement with Pat Kennedy (a pretty
fair coach BTW) but heck, ya know more than a HoFer so why should we be
surprised?
I realize this probably belongs in the ACC note, but what they hey.
Here's FSU's record against ACC schools:
W L
--- ---
Wake Forest 1 1
Georgia Tech 15 9
Maryland 0 0
Virginia 0 0
Duke 0 1
NC State 2 3
Clemson 5 6
North Carolina 1 11
|
15.387 | Dan Dakich meet Michael Jordan | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 13:57 | 21 |
| � -< So much for Bob's alleged talent woes ... >-
�
� "It would be great to coach like Bob Knight at Indiana and play nothing
� but man-to-man - as long as you can be as sure as he is that you'll
� have the athletes to do it year in and year out."
�
� - Pat Kennedy, hoops coach of the ACC's Florida State Seminoles
Show me where Pat Kennedy said that Knight has all the talent he needs to
play a man-to-man defense each year. I see the word "athletes" but I
don't see the word "talent" or "talented" anywhere.
Oh, there it is ... It's in *your* expert interpretation of his remarks.
Oh, good, that clears that little mystery up.
I repeat ... Man-to-man defenses can be played quite expertly by less
talented athletes who are in great shape both physically and mentally. I
think the 1984 Indiana upset victory over North Carolina in the East
Region Semis illustrates that point rather nicely, wouldn't you agree ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.388 | peaking guts | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:11 | 6 |
| > -< All the guts in the world won't make up for slow feet >-
And all the regular season victories won't make up for no guts in the
champheenship.
TTom
|
15.389 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Doin' the Tomahawk Chop | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:14 | 5 |
| �Go Slasher!
�TTom
Why thanky TTom. You go too. Go straight to...
|
15.390 | Can't believe you buy MrT's no-talent line... Unreal. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:18 | 11 |
| Making a distinction between "talent" and "athletes" has gotta be the
grossest example of splitting hairs I've ever heard. THEY'RE ONE
AND THE SAME THING.
I'll grant you that some athletes don't play man 'D' very well because
they lack stamina and work ethic, but the fact remains that you CANNOT
play man-to-man defense unless you possess the necessary foot speed and
quickness. It's a prerequisite for the job, plain and simple.
- ACC Chris
|
15.391 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:28 | 20 |
| >
> Making a distinction between "talent" and "athletes" has gotta be the
> grossest example of splitting hairs I've ever heard. THEY'RE ONE
> AND THE SAME THING.
NOT!
I'll give you two examples: Athlete A posesses skill and can do magic
with a round ball. Athlete B has a modicum of skill, one giant heart full
of enthusiasm and willingness to work, and works his tailbone off.
Both may excel, but one does so on grit and determination, and the other
on the whim of his brain....
Not the same thing at all....
'Saw
|
15.392 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Sons of Katie Elder | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:35 | 26 |
| Chris -
You are WAY wrong on thinking 'talent' and 'athlete' are the same
thing.
Talent can only take you so far. Granted in *some* cases, talent can
take one to the pinnacle. However, not all athletes are talented.
That's why some folks have to work and work and work to get anywhere on
the athletic field (field used generically.....)
You can make up for foot speed in many ways - cheating, anticipating.
Dan Dakich (SP?) didn't have great foot speed, now did he, but he sure
as heck shackled one Mr. Air Snub the Prez Jordan, now didn't he.
Also, the quote that you are getting 'woodied' about - you could change
"Bob Knight" and put in most coaches from big, successful hoops
programs. They do get athletes every year. Some get more talented
athletes than others (which is why you see recruiting classes rated).
If talent and athlete were the same, then everyone would be even, no?
I'll tell ya one thing, in my personal experience, there was a ton of
difference between walk-on athletes and talented scholarship
athletes...
JD
|
15.393 | Today's lunch special ... Good Ol' Fashioned Fried Soup | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 14:56 | 16 |
| Had enough yet, Soup ???
My high school baseball coach had a sign in the locker room that read ...
"Talent Without Hustle Is Nothing,
Hustle Without Talent Is Something,
Hustle With Talent Is Everything."
For the record, Pat Kennedy is right. Indiana teams are never as bereft
of raw talent as our beloved MrT would like to have us believe. But
there is also little doubt that each of Knight's *THREE* titlists were
most definitely *not* the most talented teams in the country that year.
Their hustle and discipline carried them over the top.
Bob Hunt
|
15.394 | Ketch successfully dodges issues, then makes my point! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 15:30 | 19 |
| > For the record, Pat Kennedy is right. Indiana teams are never as bereft
> of raw talent as our beloved MrT would like to have us believe.
Thank you, oh thank you (!!!) for making my point for me. This fact,
so beautifully stated by you, was my singular motivation for posting
the quote in the first place. Please feel free to return to your
talent vs. athlete rathole though.
> But there is also little doubt that each of Knight's *THREE* titlists
> were most definitely *not* the most talented teams in the country that
> year.
Come back? Bob's '76 undefeated team is generally regarded as the best
collegiate basketball team of All-Time. His '81 team was loaded to the
gills in talent as well, as even MorT admits. Only his '87 team can
honestly be considered overachievers.
- ACC Chris
|
15.395 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Oct 16 1991 15:55 | 27 |
|
ACChris has given us the essence of Dean Smith the man and the
choker in his attempt to put NC in a positive light.
>I realize this probably belongs in the ACC note, but what they hey.
>Here's FSU's record against ACC schools:
> W L
--- ---
>Wake Forest 1 1
>Georgia Tech 15 9
>Maryland 0 0
>Virginia 0 0
>Duke 0 1
>NC State 2 3
>Clemson 5 6
>North Carolina 1 11
An analysis of the 1-11 record shows the following. NC beat Fla. St.
11 times during the regular season and lost to them only once...
But it was during the Final Four and Carolina was heavily favored to
win....(1972)
At least Dean is consistent....
Cap
|
15.396 | | CAM::WAY | Party on, Garth | Wed Oct 16 1991 15:59 | 9 |
| As usual, Cap has shed light into the darkened corners of the
UNC Propaganda room.
Just like Jimmy "I have sinned (sob sob) against God" Swaggart getting
arrested again, so too has Dean been effectively shown to be the choker
that he is.....
'Saw
|
15.397 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | Smelts are a wonderful fish | Wed Oct 16 1991 16:00 | 13 |
| IU in 76 was the best 'TEAM' in the country but an arguement could be
made that they were not the most talented individually.
UCLA with Kermit washington, Marques Johnson, Andre McCarter, David
Greenwood and Ray Townsend were very talented individually(but they
were coached by Gene Bartow not Wooden). Both Rutgers and Michigan
were very talented as well.
Almost every expert does agree though that this team was the result of
one of the best coaching jobs in the history of the NCAA's, as it
resulted in perfection....
Cap
|
15.398 | Fly on your own from now on | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 16:04 | 33 |
| � Thank you, oh thank you (!!!) for making my point for me.
You're welcome. Yet another in a long chain of so-called "points" that
you've tried to make only to fatally fling yourself off the cliff of
reason instead. I gotta admit that I'm kinda getting a little fatigued
bailing you out all the time. Perhaps you might wanna try flying it solo
nexted time ??? Be sure and buckle your seat belt, please.
� Come back? Bob's '76 undefeated team is generally regarded as the best
� collegiate basketball team of All-Time. His '81 team was loaded to the
� gills in talent as well, as even MorT admits. Only his '87 team can
� honestly be considered overachievers.
The 1976 Indiana team was indeed one of the all-time great college
basketball teams ... no doubt about it. TEAM. T-E-A-M. TEAM. Much
much *MUCH* greater than the sum of its individual parts. Not one
Hoosier from that great team went on to star in the NBA, however. Quinn
Buckner and Kent Benson were career journeymen in the pros.
The 1981 Hoosiers had Isiah Thomas and a supporting cast. Besides
Thomas, only Randy Wittman stuck around in the NBA for very long. It is
possible that Landon Turner might have had a good NBA career had he not
had his accident.
The 1976 Tar Heels had Walter Davis and Phil Ford. The 1981 Tar Heels
had James Worthy and Sam Perkins. Each were (or still are) top drawer
stars in the NBA.
I'll stand by my earlier statement ... Knight's three NCAA champs
maximized their talent with their hustle, discipline and team play.
Snuff's one star-studded NCAA champ had an opposing player blow a pass.
Bob Hunt
|
15.399 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Sons of Katie Elder | Wed Oct 16 1991 16:12 | 18 |
| Hey, everyone *knows* IU hgets hoop talent. No doubt about it. Cept
it aint in the Tarhells(tm) class. Wanna take a gander at those 1981
starting lineups again....
Knight's first team was indeed a very good hoop team. No doubt about
it. Also a perfect team.
But the talent on that team was/is equal to a typical Snuffer squad.
How many first rounders did snuffer have this year? How many titles
did he bring home? (Hint, begins with a "Z" and rhymes with "hero"
So you made a point - and even if it is a 'win' - as you claim, it
still shows that Bob has produced 3 *times* the amount of chameenships
(in less time, BTW) with his *talent* then the snuffer has. So, you
*proved* once again who the bested coach is (Hint, begins with "K" and
rhymes with a word used to describe Snuffer's title count - "Slight")
JD
|
15.400 | "Dean Smith is a Great Coach." - Bob Hunt | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 16 1991 16:27 | 22 |
| > Yet another in a long chain of so-called "points" that you've tried
> to make only to fatally fling yourself off the cliff of reason
> instead.
The only mistake I made was to even acknowledge the stupid athlete vs.
talent rathole, cause it had absolutely NOTHING to do with the issue at
hand. Pat Kennedy sez BobKnight consistently gets the necessary
athletes to play man-to-man, and he (Kennedy) doesn't. MrT is constantly
moaning about IU's lack of athleticism. Period. End of discussion.
If you don't agree with Kennedy, fine. Like I said, you already know more
than a HoFer, so this is small-time stuff ...
re: Cap
Who says I was trying to paint UNC in a positive light? I knew
full-well somebody would point out the 1 'L' was in the Final 4.
For the record, FSU lost by a mere 5 points to a thoroughly loaded
UCLA team which was led by Bill Walton.
- ACC Chris
|
15.401 | I bow to the master | SLICER::HUNT | Ted, that's a Rolls Royce !!! | Wed Oct 16 1991 16:32 | 13 |
| � >North Carolina 1 11
�
� An analysis of the 1-11 record shows the following. NC beat Fla. St.
� 11 times during the regular season and lost to them only once...
�
� But it was during the Final Four and Carolina was heavily favored to
� win....(1972)
Ouch, that hurts just to read it. Cap, that is positively deadly. You
are an exquisitely gifted SPORTS assassin. James Bond himself could not
have killed him any sweeter than that.
Bob Hunt
|
15.402 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Mon Oct 21 1991 15:46 | 50 |
| Clear differentiation between talent and athleticism, in terms a hoops,
using salient examples from these parts:
1) Scott May (great shooter, tough D, good footwork boxing on boards
but no jump and morbidly slow-footed)
2) Scott Skiles (talent galore, but small and not expecially quick, best
ball handler outta Hoosierland since Larry)
3) Steve Alford (allegedly 6-2, allegedly 180 lbs, again morbidly slow,
no jump, not much strength, but could shoot and pass very well, also
learned how to drive to hoop)
It's ironic that Pat Kennedy's comment would be used, for going into
the NCAAs last year every analyst in the world predicted doom for IU in
against Florida State cuz FSU was loaded with fleet-footed musclebound
jumping jacks.
They had athleticism all over Indiana. Everybody said this for two
weeks leading up to the game. But, after soaring out to an 18 point
lead with mindblowing leaps, slams, whirlybird drives, and steals...
Indiana wore them down and beat them by 16 or so with superior talent
(i.e., dribbling, passing, shooting, boxing out, moving without the
ball, and so on).
So Pat Kennedy's the last guy in the country to talk about needing
athletes to win.
Also, I never said Indiana has no talent, but I'm persistently accused
of having said that. Again, show me a major conference champion who
started a 6-2 white guy ex-backup guard at power forward. Hillman's
role was unprecedented at that level and it happened cuz Indiana usually
has big holes in its lineup.
Take Matt Nover, for instance. PLEASE. Here's a guy who has no biz
in big-time hoops from talent standpoint, not to mention the fack that
he's a forward by size and training, and he started at center all last
year for Indiana. Against good teams he'd usually fold up like a cheap
suit and be replaced by forward Eric Anderson in the middle, thus forcing
Indiana into a 3-guard offense. This happened all last year.
Show me a single squad from the all-talent programs (SyrExcuse, Gougetown,
Star Hells, Zona, Runnin' Rabble, Michigan, etc.) where almost every year
they have no one to play a key position.
I could go on, but the facks are there and you must recognize them, at
least, if not the truth a the matter.
Big10 Tom
|
15.403 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:13 | 17 |
| Bad news on the Hoosier Hoops front: F/G Pat Graham is down for
4-6 weeks with a broken bone in his foot. Earlier this summer
Damon developed a stress fracture caused by athlete's foot, which
is apparently healed but these things have a way of coming back
sometimes. Less publicized but most worrisome of all is Eric
Anderson's ongoing battle with lower back troubles, but he's been
able to play in pain so far...
Over at Illinois, F Andy Kaufmann, probably the Illini's second best
player, and definitely their best offensive player, is out for the
year for academic woes.
Voshon Lenard, Minnesota's most touted recruit since Clem Haskins
took over, is blowing minds in workouts. There's already talk that
this 6-6 jumping jack will go pro after two years. We'll see.
Big10 Tom
|
15.404 | | CNTROL::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:40 | 4 |
| �Earlier this summer
� Damon developed a stress fracture caused by athlete's foot,
What did he do? Scratch it too hard?
|
15.405 | From Tuesday's Cincinnati Enquirer | DYPSS1::ROPER | BillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnight | Wed Oct 23 1991 22:01 | 9 |
| IU lands prep star
TERRE HAUTE, Ind. - Steve Hart, a senior guard at Terre Haute South
High School, said he will sign a basketball letter of intent next month
with Indiana University. Hart, who averaged 13.6 points a game and
helped South to the state tourney Final Four last spring, said he
picked the Hoosiers over Indiana State.
- Wildcat
|
15.406 | Good press for coach Knight | DYPSS1::ROPER | BillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnight | Tue Oct 29 1991 15:50 | 32 |
| From December Issue of SPORT magazine.
NO STARS FOR KNIGHT
Bobby Knight was enshrined in the Basketball Hall of Fame after
winning three NCAA titles at Indiana, but you can't give him any medals
for producing NBA stars. Only one, Isiah Thomas, has had an impact in
the pros. North Carolina's Dean Smith, on the other hand, can claim
some credit for Michael Jordan, James Worthy and Brad Daugherty.
Is there something wrong with Knight's coaching? Does he ruin his
players? The short answer is "No."
According to Marty Blake, head scout for the NBA, Bobby Knight
recruits good--not great--players who will fit into his system. Smith
however, starts out with the very best talent available. In other
words, Knight does a lot with the guys he gets.
"Bobby Knight doesn't recruit players with the idea of developing
them into NBA stars," says Blake. "He just wants role players to help
him win games at Indiana. It's not his job to supply us with NBA
talent."
Your welcome MrT :-)
- Wildcat
P.S. - The same issue of SPORT had this to say of Rick Pitino.
- "Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, ..."
BRAVO PITINO!
|
15.407 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 29 1991 16:12 | 7 |
| > P.S. - The same issue of SPORT had this to say of Rick Pitino.
>
> - "Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, ..."
I get the feeling you're leaving something out here. Maybe the rest
of a sentence or paragraph. Couldn't begin with 'but' now could it?
Denny ;^)
|
15.408 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnight | Tue Oct 29 1991 21:14 | 26 |
| >> I get the feeling you're leaving something out here. Maybe the rest
>> of a sentence or paragraph. Couldn't begin with 'but' now could it?
C'mon now Denny! How could you think that of ole Wildcat? I
understand that there may be some unscrupulous noters in SPORTS that
have tried to pull the wool over many an eye in the past, but not the
'Cat!
'Cause I don't want to develop a Mr(T)arnished SPORTS reputation, here is
the missing text.
Story was relating the differences between Pitino and his NY
background, and the current crop of 'Cats.
"Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, is as
N'Yawk as a $35 cab fare. John Pelphrey, Deron Feldhaus and Richie
Farmer are kids from Eastern Kentucky towns not likely to even have
cabs. Somehow, they've meshed at the University of Kentucky--along
with a couple of big-city talents, New York power forward Jamal
Mashburn and Indianapolis point guard Sean Woods--to make the Wildcats
leading candidates to be the success saga of this college basketball
season."
HTH's
- Wildcat
|
15.409 | Thanky, Wildcat. You're one classy dude. | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Wed Oct 30 1991 10:52 | 1 |
|
|
15.410 | Would you like your face eggs Benedict Arnold? | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Oct 30 1991 11:12 | 16 |
| One a the greatest disappointments I ever experieced was the other
day in the infamous keeling fields a 17.
Here we have a Big10 main, Doug Ross, submitting a detailed forecast
a the Almost Close Conference. Fine. But, only last year he was
seen barking like a dog singing vile praises for Snuffy Smif'. He
told me he humiliated himself like that willingly cuz ACCrook had
agreed to cut him in on that crooked contest such that he'd git tix
for the sold-out (pun intended) Almost Close redundantly meaningless
money-grubbing spectacle in Charlotte.
But, only months later, he's crossed the line. Doug Ross is clearly
no longer a Big10 main. He analyzes and writes reports on the ACC
and he's MIA on the Big10 - The All-Time Greatest Conference.
Big10 Tom
|
15.411 | | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 30 1991 11:21 | 8 |
|
See, Denny, you wuz right! Pitino is as "N'Yawk as a $35 cab fare".
The attentive reader would have immediately seen the connotation
for "finest" to mean "in actuality, Big Apple-overhyped". Very
perceptive, sir!
glenn
|
15.412 | IU recruiting summary (so far) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 30 1991 11:58 | 33 |
| Well I must be in a particularly generous mood today. First I dig up
recruiting info for Mildcat (tm), now for MrT.
The following represents IU's early commitments so far.
Enjoy,
- ACC Chris
WILLIAM LIEBERMAN 5-8, 175, Greenwich, CT (North)
o A classic overachiever who gets it done with hard work. He can't
run or jump and he's certainly not quick. Voted 'Most Cerebral'
at under 17 AAU's.
JOHN WALTERS 6-10, 135, Nashua, NH (Central)
o Future is all ahead of this kid. Hard worker whose projected
to grow several more inches. Early commitment to Indiana. Not
quick, fast, or a leaper, but should fit in well in Bob Knight's
system. (Five Star)
KYLE NEVE 6-4, 310, Cincinnati, OH (Moeller)
o Hard working rebounder who pulled down close to 20 board per
game at the prestigious Under 12 AAU's. Hasn't grown much since
then, but should make an impact wherever he goes! Lacks quickness
and is quite slow, but makes up for it with smarts!
|
15.413 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Smith > Knight | Wed Oct 30 1991 12:07 | 4 |
|
JOHN WALTERS 6-10, 135, Nashua, NH (Central)
Yikes this kid will make Manute Bol look like a bodybuilder!
|
15.414 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 30 1991 12:12 | 6 |
| True /Don, but remember: Manute Bol has gone onto a fairly profitable
NBA career. I suspect Walters will end up CBA-bound like most Knight
products ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.415 | nit | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | This *IS* my day job... | Wed Oct 30 1991 13:53 | 9 |
| re .412, .413:
There is no Central High in Nashua, just one public high school (Nashua
High) and a Catholic high school (Bishop Guertin). However there is a
Central High in nearby Manchester, perhaps that's what the publication
meant...
py
|
15.416 | Must be from Manchester ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 30 1991 14:01 | 4 |
| Yup, that must be it py. Tanks.
- ACC Chris
|
15.417 | Smoke and Mirrors, I guess ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 30 1991 14:22 | 8 |
| BTW, neither Lieberman, Walters, or Neve are listed in my Poop Sheet's
list of the top *200* HS prospects in the USA.
Hate to admit it, but it appears I've been wrong. Bob really *does* do
more with less. :^(
- ACC Chris
|
15.418 | No egos in that bunch | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Moving is HELL | Wed Oct 30 1991 16:24 | 8 |
| I saw the words "slow", "can't jump", "not quick", "hard working" all
over that Indiana recruiting report. Sounds like the typical BobKnight
team, they should fit right in.
After all, isn't what coaching (as opposed to recruiting) is all about
- getting more out of your players.
Commander Scott
|
15.419 | Nope. Not a single ego. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Oct 30 1991 16:34 | 13 |
| Right Commander. Couldn't agree more. I predict Bob will get
*maximum* mileage outa that bunch.
Ya know, Dean's warned me (and those like me) in the past about not
paying any attention to those recruiting ratings, and the more I think
about it, the more I think he's right. I wish we'd_a signed one of 'em
but no, Dean only sticks with the top-notch studly types, whilst Poor
Bob gets the leftovers.
Oh well,
- ACC Chris
|
15.420 | Will they enter as grad students? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | | Thu Oct 31 1991 17:07 | 10 |
|
re .412
Funny stuff, Chris. And nicely done. Some people *APPEAR* to have
believed it.
Any word on how Montross is looking in pre-season? He may be a
traitor to the true cause :^), but I'm still curious.
tom
|
15.421 | Sound a Silence | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Nov 01 1991 08:45 | 5 |
| I'm not saying anything in here teal rap master D. Benedict Ross,
Purdue main, musters a little interest in his home Conference and
note...
Big10 Tom
|
15.422 | | DUGROS::ROSS | I came, I saw, I left | Fri Nov 01 1991 15:14 | 38 |
| > <<< Note 15.421 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" >>>
> -< Sound a Silence >-
>
> I'm not saying anything in here teal rap master D. Benedict Ross,
> Purdue main, musters a little interest in his home Conference and
> note...
Okay, MrT... you try moving to ACC land and get any info on the Big 10.
Here's the pre-pre-preseason prediction for the Big 10:
1) Indiana - Anything less than second place in the conference and
a Great 8 NCAA finish will mean Bob underachieved. Cal
Cheaney is exceptional. Everyone else will play their
assigned roles. If Damon Bailey gets even a little
bit better, and frosh widebody stud Henderson lives up
to expectations, this team should be a test for Duke for
the title. Yes, they are lacking in size and big athletes,
but that's Bob's fault.
2) Ohio State - They faded last year but should be strong again this
year, especially if Lawrence Funderburke stays in school.
Jimmy Jackson will hopefully continue to improve.
Rest of the bunch...
Iowa
Michigan - best recruiting class since Dean's 1990 :-) Steve Fisher better
win with this bunch or he's toast.
Illinois
Minnesota
Michigan State
Purdue
Northwestern
Wisconsin
|
15.423 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jane & Ted's Bogus Adventure | Tue Nov 05 1991 10:33 | 19 |
| >frosh wideobyd stud Henderson
Main you ARE outta touch!
Alan Henderson is the exact opposite a a widebody stud. Alan (a
Nat'l Honor Society student, btw) is what they call painfully
skinny. He's got skeels awright, but not a the nuclear widebody
mogambo studly nature: great hands, nice touch, excellent jump
timing, good feet, long arms, etc.
Perhaps you mistook Alan for Glenn Robinson, who IS truly a widebody
nuclear stud. Glenn has NBA written all over his massively musculated
bod, and has a mean streak to go along with his sneering Alonzo
Mourning-style turnaround jumper and he likes to make people fly thru
the air when he boards. But it'd be hard to mistake for Glenn, cuz
Glenn couldn't muster the minimum SAT scores and will sit out prop48
(and IU ain't never had no prop48 meat).
Big10 Tom
|
15.424 | Reality check. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 11 1991 16:30 | 21 |
| re: .-1 (MrT)
In the words of my hero Ronnie Reagan, ...
"There he goes again." :^(
MorT would have us believe that Henderson is some geeky kid with thick
glasses who gets sand kicked in his face when he goes to the beach and
his shot slapped back whenever he dare step inside with the Big Boys.
Unfortunately this fails to wash with the simple fact that Alan
Henderson was ranked in every Top 10 recruting list in the USA and,
more often than not, in the Top 5. (Along with Glenn Robinson.)
This makes it two (2) years in a row Bob has nailed one of the premier
forwards in the USA, and the Hoosiers are ranked in everybodies Top 5.
Failure to win the Big10 and reach the Final 4 would have to be
considered underachievement, IMHO.
- ACC Chris
|
15.426 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Nov 12 1991 09:39 | 3 |
| We've known about Chris' political problem for years Hawk. You
shoula axed, we'd have helped.
Denny
|
15.427 | Reality check revisited | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | give me your sweet soul dream | Tue Nov 12 1991 22:36 | 43 |
| Chris,
Indiana's only recruit two years ago was Damon Bailey. Not exactly
a premier forward; certainly a premier player.
Alan Henderson was indeed a highly-ranked player, top 5 by most people,
and he's looked good in practice and the intra-squad scrimmage. He's also
listed in the Big 10 yearbook at 6'9", 200 lbs.; certainly not a geek, but not
a "nuclear widebody stud" by any stretch of the imaginiation. He's a skinny
kid with a lot of talent, and with a lot of work to do if he plans to play
anything other than a finesse game at the college level. For comparison
purposes, some other players from IU's current roster:
Calbert Cheaney - 6'6", 204
Eric Anderson - 6'9", 229
Matt Nover - 6'8", 225
Henderson got 26 with 15 boards in the Hoosier's intra-squad scrimmage
over the weekend. Cheaney lead the scoring with 32, and Lindemann got 12 with
12 boards. Sounds like Lindemann might actually be some help before the
season's over. If he and Henderson are good enough to make a significant
contribution, Indiana has a chance to be as good as people are predicting. If
not, they may have the same inside problem(s) as last year.
Outside, things may not be looking good. Meeks seems to be recovering
from his leg problem, but PGraham is out till December with the broken foot,
and some people who've seen practices think Bailey isn't 100 percent after his
broken foot over the summer. GGraham had a good summer on an international
team, but went 7-for-27 from the floor in the scrimmage so may not be the
answer to the outside shooting problem.
The current plan is to red-shirt PKnight and Chris Reynolds, but
Reynolds will have to play this year if the other guards' injuries don't come
around.
Hoosiers play the Bruins in the Tip-Off Classic on Friday. The
schedule's more difficult this year after last year's collection of down
programs, so the won-lost record should more closely reflect the quality
of the team. By Saturday we'll have a good indication as to whether or not
��they're over-rated.
tom
|
15.428 | Revisited reality check revisited | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Nov 13 1991 09:19 | 12 |
| tom,
Me_thinks you're forgetting about IU's signing of Top 5 Lawrence
Funderburke, who Bob chased off. (Nothing new here.) Interesting that
he chose to go to Ohio State. In the ACC this wouldn't happen, cause
there's a gentleman's agreement among the coaches to not take each
others transfers. For instance, Clifford Rozier wanted to go to FSU,
but Pat Kennedy honored this agreement and told Cliffy to look
elsewhere.
- ACC Chris
|
15.429 | Time flies, don't it? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | give me your sweet soul dream | Wed Nov 13 1991 22:33 | 18 |
| Chris,
Didn't (couldn't!) forget the wandering one, but he was recruited
two years before Henderson. Two premier forwards in *3* years - definitely
a minor nit.
There's a similar agreement in the Big Ten, but it's broached on
occasion. Two other instances I can think of are Derek Holcomb transferring
from Indiana to Illinois 10-12 years ago, and Brad Sellers going from
Wisconsin to Ohio State in the mid-80s.
The word from around the Ohio State campus, btw, is that Funderburke
is playing well enough to look like a POTY candidate for next season. Have
to wonder if he can keep his head straight for that long, though.
HOW'S MONTROSS?
tom
|
15.430 | No, he's not gonna transfer back to Indiana. ;^) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Nov 14 1991 08:53 | 22 |
| > HOW'S MONTROSS
Dunno. Last year he averaged 5.8 ppg, 4.2 rpg. Considering he was a
freshman who was only getting around 15 mpg, that's not bad. Also
consider that he played by far his best basketball toward the end of
last season, especially on defense.
It's a plus that he made this years Pan Am team but, for whatever
reason, received almost no playing time. He was relegated to 3rd
string, behind Laettner and Peplowski. :^(
Montross is a solid player and, despite Doug Ross' dire predictions, I
think he'll develop nicely. No predictions on numbers this year but,
assuming he stays injury-free, he'll see plenty of minutes. That alone
should get him toward double-digit rebounding numbers. Dean sits down
with every player after the season and tells him what he wants him to
work on in the off-season. He told Montross he wanted him to work on
his offensive moves, particularly posting up on the block. We'll see
soon how much improvement he's made!
- ACC Chris
|
15.431 | Gophs | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Thu Nov 14 1991 09:46 | 9 |
| One guy to watch this year may be Voshan Leonard of the Gophers. Clem
Haskins recruited him out of the Detroit area and everyone is gushing
over him locally. I haven't seen him yet, but I've heard he was ranked
in the top 25 freshman recruits. Some of the people that have watched
him are saying things like he's the best player on the roster right now
to he'll be gone in two years. (NBA)
Spud
|
15.432 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Fri Nov 15 1991 15:57 | 48 |
| Voshon Lenard was ranked in the top dozen in those lists I saw.
On Indiana, they're definitely overranked right now, but could fulfill
a top4 ranking by the year's end. The reason they're so highly ranked
is that the sportswriters know that Bob is loaded with talent for the
first time in a decade, and the ranking reflects his abilities as a
coach more than the team.
As to the team, as Mr. Simpson so nicely positioned, they're gonna have
to rely on two raw freshmen on the front line... hardly a proposition
for being the 2nd best squad in the nation at this point. Beyond that,
if Lindemann (who's not a blue chipper) stumbles against the big studs
then it's back to either forward Eric Anderson outta position and
undersized in the post, or the awful Matt Nover, who was barely even
recruited outta H.S. and also outta position and undersized in the post.
More may depend on Lindemann than Henderson. If he flops then IU is
back to people outta position on a team that's small to begin with.
Also, against the nuclear widebody stud squads like Michigan and Iowa
they'd like to move Calbert to off-guard and beef up along the front
line (Cheany's not very good at defense and reboudning inside, although
he's improved). Henderson could help there if Lindemann flops by either
going into the post (again, outta position) or by playing forward while
Anderson or (ugh) Nover plays the middle.
The other non-2nd best aspect of this squad is that none of their guards
are talented outside shooters except PGraham, who may miss the year.
Damon's ok, but needs to improve. This is a team dominated by PGs.
Also, the injury situation is somewhat shaky, especially with Anderson's
chronic bad back. Then there's Damon's broken foot. And then PGraham's
broken foot.
re: Funderburke
No "gentlemen's agreement was broached." Bob worked with Ohio State's
coach (who agreed that he should be forced to sit out a year to get his
scrambled haid together) and encouraged Lawrence to return to his home
town and play for the Buckeyes.
Should be a close game tonight against UCLA. Whether or not the Hoosiers
lose tonight they'll drop down into the 10-15 ranking range as their
holes and youth manifest themselves. They could be 2nd best by year's
end... IF the injury situation doesn't go bad and Lindemann-the-project
holds up.
Big10 Tom
|
15.433 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnight | Sat Nov 16 1991 12:25 | 5 |
| Beautiful piece of coaching last night by the General. I suppose
Calbert's gonna be a better man later on for setting out the most
crucial part of the game! Beautiful Mr. Humble, simply beautiful.
- Wildcat
|
15.434 | Horrid coaching effort by Knight. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 18 1991 08:56 | 12 |
| Gotta agree with Wildcat on this one. Why Knight saw the need to
humilate Cheaney is beyond me. (Me thinks it's his *HUGE* ego, which
sees the need to constantly puff his chest and show his players who's
in charge ...) Give the UCLA kid credit for playing some great
in_yo_face defense. Give Knight credit for removing any possibility
for Indiana to win the game by sitting Calbert down for practically the
entire 2nd half ...
Alan Henderson looks good though. The real thing for sure ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.435 | Not particularly suprising, but there are signs... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 10:32 | 48 |
| While you guys are busy attempting to prove that Bob cain't coach
(he of the 3 Nat'l Championships and 10 Big10 Titles in 20 years)
Knight was busy preparing his team to have its best chance at both
his conference and the NCAAs:
* Calbert deserved to sit and he knew it. After two years he's still
unable to unleash that lightning first step of his to help out on
D or fill the rebounding lanes. Vitale did several replays of IU
defensive breakdowns, and they were two culprits: Nover, who cain't
move and has no business even as a scrub on a Div. IA squad... and
Calbert.
He and the team will be better for his pine time. Also, it was a
blowout anyway and so a perfect teaching opportunity.
* It was devastating to see Nover starting ahaid a Lindemann. But,
after seeing Lindemann, it was apparent that IU is at least a half
season away from having a serviceable (i.e., grade C) center.
* Damon, who got more hype coming out of H.S. than anybody since Lou
Alcindor, was overmatched. Time and again he penetrated only to be
stripped of the ball or have in jammed down his throat. Being haidy,
he adapted by staying outside. Trouble is, this is a poor outside
shooting team unless Eric and Calbert go outside, and so the blowout
deepened.
On the bright side:
* While he may not be a center, Alan Henderson is the best big main
recruited to IU since Landon Turner matriculated in '78. Not saying
much, true, but that makes it all the more significant.
* Kudos to Bob for redshirted his quickest and best defensive player
Chris Reynolds so that he could learn how to shoot. Coulda used him
against UCLA, but it was best for his future.
* The Hoosiers, purportedly the 2nd best squad in the nation, were able
to keep the blowout from getting outta hand against what has to be
the most physically talented team in the nation. UCLA not only has
widebodies crammed down to the end of the bench, they've got a great
young point guard in Madkins (?) and a fine senior big main in McClean.
It's unlikely that Indiana'll be able to play with a loaded U. Kaintuck,
but they should be able to stay with Louisville and ND and the others and,
hopefully, fashion some form of floor game (i.e., rebounding & D) and
find an outside shooter by the beginning of the Big10 season.
Big10 Tom
|
15.436 | Not one of Bob's better efforts, for sure. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:01 | 17 |
| The thing I find so shocking about the Hoosiers game was that this is a
team basically intact from last year. The only big change is the
addition of someone even MrT acknowledges to be a mega-talent. (If
memory serves, last years Hoosiers were ranked in the Top 4 at season
end before stumbling in the tournament ...)
BTW, I disagree that the game was out of reach when Calbert hit the
pine. Behind by 10-15 points with most of the second half to play
ain't squat but, as Vitale pointed out, Bob has failed miserably at
incorporating the 3-point shot into his offense, despite having a
plethora of fine outside shooters. (3 point shooting can get you back
in a game *quick*, but Friday night Bob's mega-ego seemed content at
humiliating officials and players alike, as opposed to concentrating on
a 'W'. Go figure ...)
- ACC Chris
|
15.437 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:18 | 49 |
| >despite having a plethora of outside shooters.
Well, you cain reinvent reality all you want, but the most glaring
weakness of the Hoosiers, IMNSHO, isn't the lack of a center, it's
the total lack of outside shooting. GGraham is a great athlete, but
coming out of H.S. his flat-arch shot was so bad that this past summer
they reworked his delivery from the ground up, and are hoping he'll
show some shooting skills with it. PGraham, whom experts regard as
IU's only quality outside shooter, has a broken foot. Even Bob, the
best coach in the history of the game, proved unable to heal PGraham's
fracture. And even if this miracle worker coulda, PGraham is a acute
WMD victim and has trouble developing good shots and carries a big cost
in IU's main-to-main D scheme.. Reynolds' shot is so bad that he and
Bob agreed that he'd redshirt this year and rework *his* shot from the
ground up like GGraham. Jamaal Meeks has never been touted as a shooter,
but cain cain the medium range jumper if open.
Then there's Damon. He has yet to emerge as a good outside shooter.
His shot selection and shooting mechanices look near perfec, but he
hasn't yet shown the consistency required to get the permanent green
light from Bob. In fairness to Damon, he played SF in H.S. in a very
rural league, and is still learning.
Halfway into last year the experts agreed that IU's outside shooting
was suspect except for Calbert and Eric.
I say that this paucity of perimeter shooting outweighs the absence of
a grade C middlemain cuz Indiana has succeded before with a 3-guard
lineup... but with outside shooting.
Bob will thrash his lineup mixing PT among his guards, losing games and
hurting his precious overall winning percentage, until he finds a combo
that works. At the same time he'll struggle to fashion the young Todd
Lindemann into a serviceable guy in the paint, changing some shots and
grabbing some bounds and picking up some trips to the FT line.
Until then, as I said before the UCLA game, look for Indiana to drop
into the teens in the rankings as they demonstrate an inability to play
with the Final Four contenders (i.e., Duke, Kaintuck, Arkansas, SyrExcuse,
Iowa, UCLA, et al) and a tendency to have close games against grade B
teams.
2nd ranked Indiana is on the cusp between grade A and B, but they should
improve with experience and Bob's player development program. Right now
they look like they should finish 3rd in the Big10 behind Iowa and the
maize and blue...
Big10 Tom
|
15.438 | Teach in November; Win in March ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | From the young man in the 22nd row ... | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:19 | 9 |
| I watched most of the Indiana-UCLA game, too, and I had some of the same
thoughts about Indiana that T has stated. They'll be a powerful team come
season's end. Alan Henderson is the real deal.
Nothing wrong with Calbert Cheaney grabbin' some pine in November. He'll
be on the floor in March. And I still like Damon Bailey. He could play
for my team any day.
Bob Hunt
|
15.439 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the door | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:20 | 10 |
| > Friday night Bob's mega-ego seemed content at
> humiliating officials and players alike, as opposed to concentrating on
> a 'W'. Go figure ...)
Kind of Like Snuffy refusing to play zone at home against Duke or getting
tossed from the Kansas game with 35 ticks left and congratulating the
oppossision...
|
15.440 | "More ..." - Bob Hunt | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 18 1991 11:51 | 29 |
| > Teach in November, win in March
Why not teach *and* win in November, teach *and* win in March? Nowhere
is it written that these two (2) items are mutually exclusive. I
personally don't subscribe to the notion that Bob is a master of this
anyway. He's managed to peak masterfully on three (3) season-ending
occasions. He deserves and receives mucho credit for this.
But what about the other 17 years? What about all those disapointing
early exits? What about *last* year, when he had a team in the Top 4
in the country. They then struggled to win games against Coastal
Carolina and FSU before getting blown away by Kansas. Guess Bob's
November teaching wasn't good enough, although he sure was piling on
the W's ...
I just can't understand the need to bench your best player, a preseason
All-American, in a game you can still win. What does this teach him
that can't be taught in practice? (Other than how to be humiliated
on national television ...) I also find it hilarious that MorT, whose
been exclusively complaining about IU's lack of a big man as their
achilles heel, suddenly sez they don't have a perimeter game. Haw!
Bailey can shoot and make 3's. So can Andersen. Clearly Cheaney can.
That's 3 outa 5 players who are OUTSTANDING outside shooters. Let's
not talk about how your bench scrubs can't shoot - let's talk about how
your prime time players CAN shoot. (When Knight let's 'em play, that
is.)
- ACC Chris
|
15.441 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 12:34 | 64 |
| >What about all those early exits?
What about 'em? He's had less than most coaches. Certainly far
fewer than Snuffer.
>He's managed to peak masterfully on three (3) season-ending
>occasions.
Translated in to plain English: He's managed to win three National
Championships in 20 years; while Snuffy, with oodles more talent (just
look at his NBA All-Stars) has managed only one in 30 years, and needed
a end-game gift from a stoned guard to avoid squandering *that* one.
>let's not talk about... scrubs
I went over the outside shooting skills of all the guards on the team.
You said the Hoosiers were loaded with outside shooters, and I showed
you that they don't really have one, except maybe PGraham, who's hurt,
and even *he* shot only about 30% last year from outside last year.
Damon Bailey has not shot well from outside. Yeah, he cain cain the
trey, and has some great outside shooting games, but overall he's a
debit right now from the arc. You fallaciously criticize Bob for
poorly integrating the trey into his game plan, but fail to mention
that he's unleashed many trey attempts when he had the shooters. He
doesn't this year, so he's better off sticking with the inside game.
Btw, two of the three fine outside shooters you mention (Eric and
Calbert) are needed inside given the dire situation in there (IU tends
to get badly outrebounded, did last year). True, with Alan Calbert
will be more freed up to go out to the corner. False, until he
improves his J no way is Bob gonna give the green light to Damon and
that's fine by me.
Sitting Calbert was deserved and necessary. The Hoosiers were overmatched
and Cheany was doing a horseheet job with the floor game. If he persists
at hurting his team by not helping out on D and rebounding, he could end
up seeing a lot more pine time.
As for FSU, about half the pundits last year predicted that the Seminoles
would beat IU cuz a their vastly superior physical talent. Sure 'nuff,
IU was intimidated with magambo blocked shots, bounds, and jams, and
went up by 17. But then, their poor hoops skeels showed up as the Hoosiers
gutsily stuck to their game plan and didn't freak out. IU won by 18 or
so, with a "coaching swing" of about 35 points in less than a quarter.
UCLA has the same suite of nuclear widebodies that FSU had, but these
kids knokw how to play the hoops, especially Madkins and McClean. Ditto
for Kansas, whom IU would have trouble keeping up with even now.
Face it: the Hoosiers are vastly overrated due to their coach's vaunted
capabilities. They're chock full a holes. As Dickie-poo intelligently
observed, Bob cain't work his magic on this flawed squad until at the
earliest halfway through the season.
Meanwhile, Michigan will be preening the "best incoming freshman class
ever." And Iowa is loaded, with a fine center and some tough front-line
guys.
Here's hoping for another "masterful season-ending peak!"
Big10 Tom
|
15.442 | Poor IU. Can't rebound. Cain't shoot. Cain't play 'D'. Cain't jump. Cain't | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:23 | 24 |
| You've reached new lows on the Intellectual Honesty front, MorT. (And
that's sayin' something, *believe* me!)
How you can look us in the eye (figuratively speaking) and say that
Florida State had tons more talent than last years Hucksters is
amazing. (I suppose Coastal Carolina had more too, right?) How you
can bad-mouth IU's talent, when that very same talent took them to a #1
seed in the NCAA Tournament, is equally amazing. (They've got more this
year than last, with the addition of the studly Henderson.)
I also think you're giving UCLA too much credit. They've got talent,
but they haven't gotten over their old problems of selfishness, poor
shot selection, and lack of intelligent play. No way should they have
blown out the highly ranked Hoosiers.
BTW, I ran into my HoosierHead (tm) neighbor yesterday. First words
outa his mouth (spoken crisply) were 'I'm not talking about The Game.'
Luved it!
- ACC Chris
- ACC Chris
|
15.443 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | N.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptus | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:39 | 5 |
| MorT, let me get this straight. The same scribes and pundits who
vastly overrate IU's talent are right on the money when assessing UNC's
talent?
/Don
|
15.444 | | CAM::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:44 | 48 |
| I was at a get together to watch the Giants game yesterday.
One of the fellows had seen Bob Knight speak recently (or maybe last
year, I couldn't quite tell) at a Massachusetts showcase for new talent
of whatever.
After the speakers, they had the assistant coaches get up and answer
questions.
One boob in the audience, of course, asks about The Chair.
The ass't coach says
"Geez, here we go again. Everybody always asks
about the chair. I really don't see what the big
deal is. Bob saw an old lady on the far side of
the court who didn't have a chair, and being
the gentleman that he is, slid one across for her"
I guess there was also a story about Bob coaching Jordan in da Olympics.
The US was playing Canada and we're beating them up pretty good.
Jordan in particular was having a great game. Come halftime, Knight had
to go in and make some kind of speech to fire up the team for the
second half.
On his way in, he really couldn't think of anything else to say so he
decided to pick on Jordan (who was playing best of anyone). So, Knight
starts in on Jordan:
"Dammit Michael, I haven't seen you set ONE pick out there
tonight. Oh you're shooting well, and passing well,
but dammit, get into the game. I wanna see you setting
some PICKS in the second half"
Well, it turns out Michael had recently read a quote from Knight were
Knight said that Jordan was probably the quickest player he'd ever seen.
So Michael replies:
"Yeah, but Coach, I was reading how you think I'm the
quickest player you've ever seen. I was setting pick
out there. I was just setting them so quick you
couldn't see 'em"
Well, Knight just broke out laughing and had to leave the locker room....
|
15.445 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:46 | 41 |
| FACT: IU was a poor rebounding poor outside shooting team last year.
FACT: IU was the weakest team in the middle in the conference last year,
and, given that Matt Nover is probably the worst Div. IA center in
the game right now, they IU may indeed be the weakest team in the
middle in the country.
You're right, with the addition of superstar Alan nothing has changed
from last year. And, based on their 29-5 record last year, another
thing that won't change is their being overrated, this year starting
out at #2, dropping down to #18 or so, and then - as Bob's teaching and
experience catch up, moving up to #6-8 or so.
Dick Vitale said UCLA is loaded, not me. Dick Vitale also said that in
order to compete at the highest level they needed to get some play from
the center position. The most popular upset prediction in the pre-NCAAs
prognostication was FSU over IU. This was in USA Today and on ESPN,
poor MrT had nothing to do with it.
What's your point? That talentless/skilless Matt Nover is a big-time
center? That a team that got outrebounded with regularity last year is
loaded in the middle? That a team that shot very poorly from the arc
last year is a great perimeter shooting team?
That' Bob cain't coach?
Here's my point: IU shoulda been preseason ranked at about #15, cuz
that's about what they are. They'll get better as Alan catches on. If
big Todd Lindemann catches on they'll get a LOT better and in a hurry.
No matter what they do they'll be a poor guard-shooting team and in the
Big10 that means 4 or 5 losses cuz they'll be zoned to death.
And that with 3-for-20 and 10-for-20 Bob's coaching credentials are
beyond dispute... He's the best ever.
Your capacity for twisting things and refusing to allow the Truth is
beyond me. I call 'em as I see 'em, and I see 'em as they are. This
is why I've been referred to in here thousands a times as "MrT, SPORTS'
Objective Analyst."
MrT
|
15.446 | Come clean MrT | EARRTH::BROOKS | Too legit ! Too legit to quit ! | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:56 | 10 |
| MorT (what doesn THAT mena anyhow ?), Dick Vitale also picked IU as the
best in the country.
As did SPORT and INSIDE SPORTS ...
So tell us, are all of these people lying ? And like Slasher says, if
in fact they overrate IU's talent, then they must be doing the same for
UNC right ?
Dr Midnight
|
15.447 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:00 | 46 |
| >The same scribes and pundits who vastly overrate IU's talent are
>right on the moneyw hen assessing UNC's talent?
Nice try, Hairy Smithna, but you fall short in a ridiculous manner:
1) Forget the writers and lookit Bob and Snuffer. Each rated Eric
Montross as the top center two years ago. Snuffy got him cuz Bob
had to pay the price to make sure that his crippled PF didn't get
screwed by Eric's shyster-father.
So, at the center position both coaches are on-record.
2) IU has more talent now than at any time since '81, when they had a
true superstar in Isiah. I'm on record having said that.
But I'm also on record for having said that they had two gaping holes
last year: No center, poor perimeter shooting, and a sorry lack a
depth at the forwared position. In other words, after Funderburke
left, Bob's first highly touted recruiting class in over ten years
was Calbert and a half dozen poor shooting point guards.
What's changed this year is that with Alan they now have some depth at the
forward spot. What hasn't changed is the center problem (note: Snuffy
has a passle of 7 footers) but that maybe, could, possibly, potentially,
change if Todd Lindemann improves, and the perimeter shooting problem,
which will definitely improve somewhat with Alan freeing up Calbert, but
won't improve to the point where IU is a big-time hard-to-beat Duke/UCLA/
Arkansas/Carolina/SyrExcuse/et al level unless at the very least Damon
Bailey learns how to hit the outside shot.
He's young, he might. Lindemann's young, and totally inexperienced at
not having a one foot height advantage, but he might improve to.
Right now IU is looking for a shooting guard and a center. This is not
the mark of a top team. I'd rank IU at about #18 right now.
Carolina has no holes to speak of. They have the center Bob wanted to
be his first true star center ever. They have one a the hottest outside
shooters ever. They have a widebody who cain play either SF or PF.
They have H.S. A-As falling off the end of the bench.
Only thing they don't have is a great coach, a Bob-style coach.
But who does? [IU]
MrT(erribly Objective On This)
|
15.448 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:08 | 28 |
| >are all of these people lying ?
No, they're paying tribute to Bob's genius, a tribute to his capacity
for "meaningless end-of-season peaks" which has nothing to do with
where they are right now.
They're also ignoring the FACK that Indiana is starting at center a guy
who was projected all along to be an end-of-bench backup PF with poor
skills and little H.S. experience. The loss of Montross, then Funderburke,
and other big-time centers that Bob has failed to recruit saw to Nover's
unexpected role.
And they're ignoring the FACK that IU was a poor rebounding team last
year and the FACK that IU was, with the exception of Calbert, was a poor
perimeter shooting team last year.
Who's wrong?
I'll stand by my preseason prediction. Indiana's gonna lose a lotta
games (4-8) and will slump to somewhere in the 15-20 range (unless the
insanity rankings persists) and will take a run at a Big10 Title that
may or may not work out (but wouldn't work out if the Big10 wasn't
rebuilding this year) and will end the regular season at about #6-8
and will maybe make the Sweet Sixteen but certainly is only a longshot
to make the Final Four - where they'd have no chance at all against
more veteran teams with no gaping holes to speak of.
MrT(ruthful Even When It's Unpopular)
|
15.449 | MorT proven hopelessly dishonest [again] | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:13 | 12 |
| > Here's my point: IU shoulda been preseason ranked at about #15,
Let me get this straight. IU finished #4 in the USA last year. IU
lost NOBODY from that team. IU added one of the top 5 players in the
USA. And you say they should be preseason #15.
Here's *my* point: You're fulluv_it. (BS, that is.)
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
15.450 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnight | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:24 | 16 |
| 'T, you're definitely a "LEGEND IN YOU'RE *OWN* MIND" :-)
Allow me to correct you on your assesment of UK's "loaded" team. This
team is the same team plus Jamal Mashburn that Pitino inherited two
years ago. He inherited a team of nobody's. Pelphrey, Feldhaus,
Woods, Farmer, Brassow ... Not exactly a group of blue-chippers here.
Eddie Sutton had the same team plus Chris Mills, Leron, Ellis, and Sean
Sutton, and went something like 13-18 his last year! Pitino comes in
and takes the group minus Mills, Ellis, and Sutton and nobody over 6-7
and goes 14-14 the first year, and 22-6 last year! I only wish Pitino
had the talent IU has the last couple of years.
BTW, this years freshman class at UK was rated number 17 I believe by
Bob Gibbons.
Wildcat
|
15.451 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | N.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptus | Mon Nov 18 1991 14:33 | 4 |
| MorT, you never answered my question just babbled on for about
50 lines or so. You should follow a career path in politics.
/Don
|
15.452 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Mon Nov 18 1991 17:40 | 36 |
| >Let me get this straight. IU fnished #4 in the USA last year.
Oh, you got it straight alright. Straight that joe such a pathological
lie that even if wanted to (and you certainly do not) joe cain't stop:
1) IU got blown out of the Sweet Sixteen. Thus, it's reasonable to
call them #16 based on last year.
2) IU, as you have been panting heavily all day long, had trouble with
Coastal Carolina and FSU, which factoring for the draw might even
cause one to conclude that they weren't even in the top16 based on
real world results at last year's end.
3) IU added a great, but extremely green, young forward. Not a great
rebounder or power player, but a truly fine player. Meanwhile,
their two main holes (no off-guard, no center), remain unsolved.
4) And most egregiously, you persist in fallaciously implying that I'm
comparing last year's March edition to this year's. I aim not. All
I'm saying is that last year's team was flawed and this year's team
has the same danged flaws, and that it'll take a coupla months to
find out whether this team cain be considered a contender to make
the Final Four.
They could emerge as such a contender, but I rather doubt that they
will. While they have a lotta horses, they just don't seem to have the
right horses. Unless, of course, Todd Lindemann surprises the living
hail outta me, which could happen and which I of course *hope* happens...
No, I'd trade IU's lineup for Carolina's lineup in a New York minute.
They have the center IU lusted for but didn't get cuz a their classy
behavior, in Lynch they have a forward who'll go farther in the NBA
than Eric Anderson will, in Hubert they have a guard who cain actually
light it up from afar, and they have... experience.
Big10 MrT
|
15.453 | IU poses mega-matchup problems to almost every opponent | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Nov 19 1991 09:19 | 24 |
| > IU got blown out of the Sweet Sixteen. Thus, it's reasonable to
> call them #16 based on last year.
Hardy-Har-Har! Not so fast, MorT. IU underachieved *badly* in this
years tourney, just like they've underachieved *badly* in past years.
With Bob it seems you either get a marginal degree of overachievement
or (more often) a similar degree of underachievement. (In the cases of
Cleveland State and Richmond, we're talking exponential
underachievement.)
IU is clearly a legitimate Top 4 club last year. I've yet to see a
poll this year that didn't put them in the Top 4. They're the
favorites to win the Big 10 this year, and rightly so. For whatever
reason they fell flat on their faces against an admittedly well-playing
UCLA squad.
BTW, when comparing UNC with IU I'd hasten to point out we don't have a
player who even comes close to the ability of Cheaney, who's about as
sweet_a offensive talent as you'll ever wanna see. Andersen impresses
the heck outa me with his shooting and all-around game. And your
stable of guards leaves Carolina flat-out in the dust.
- ACC Chris
|
15.454 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKight | Tue Nov 19 1991 10:49 | 38 |
| ACCrock, you're capacity for staring down Reality is, well, almost
Dan-like in its unabashed majesty:
* These "early round exits" you keep huffing and puffing about are
much less frequent that you'd have us believe, in fact, less frequent
than in a certain Star Hell program that'll go unnamed.
* Yes, Cheaney's a supreme offensive talent. He also may soon be a
substitute unless he starts playing an at least mediocre floor game
with the D and the 'bounds.
* We'll probably never know how good a college player Eric Anderson
coulda been, cuz on D they routinely rotate out the awful Nover and
rotate in Anderson to belly up against true centers, which just as
routinely causes him to end up in foul trouble (as against UCLA),
tire out (as against UCLA), or reinjure his chronic lower back (as
against Kansas).
* The great guard talent you keep talking about is certainly real in
terms of speed, jumping ability, quickness, etc. It is, alas,
certainly not there in terms of jump shooting.
>With Bob it seems yo either get a marginal degree of overachievement
>or (more often) a similar degree of underachievement.
If by "marginal degree of overachievement" you imply that he hasn't
attained the "consistent excellence" that CoachK sneeringly congratulated
Snuffy for during that hilarious pre-Final Four interview last year, I
cain only clutch my Bob Doll and weep with thanks.
On the other hand, you must somehow reconcile this fantastic assertion
with the fact that Bob has one a the highest overall winning percentages,
one a the highest NCAA tourney winning percentages, and 10 Big10 Titles
in 20 years.
Good luck, 'Crockmeister!
Big10 MrT
|
15.455 | Big Ten preseason schedule | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Nov 22 1991 22:44 | 184 |
| From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Big Ten Pre-conference Schedules
Date: 21 Nov 91 23:05:00 GMT
Thanks to the many who contributed to this. Home games in CAPS, road
games and road tourneys in lower case...
Penn State
n25 illinois
n27 BUFFALO
d2 american
d6-7 first bank classic (milwaukee)
(Marquette, Columbia, and St. Francis)
d14 BOWLING GREEN
d18 drexel (palestra)
d21 georgia (kuppenheiner classic - atlanta)
d27-29 west palm beach classic (miami)
(Miami, Fl., Marshall, and George Washington)
j2 ohio state
j7 james madison
j11 MORGAN STATE
j13 BROWN
j16 marshall
j18 MIAMI, OH.
j21 butler
j25 penn (hershey)
j27 TOLEDO
f2 MARYLAND-BALTIMORE COUNTY
f3 DUQUESNE
f8 old dominion
f10 temple (hershey)
f17 maryland-baltimore county
f20 LAFAYETTE
f24 OLD DOMINION
m2 AMERICAN
Illinois
n25 PENN STATE
n30 NE LOUISIANA
d3 TENNESSEE STATE
d6-7 ILLINI CLASSIC
(vs. Hawaii, and SC State vs. Washington)
d10 temple
d21 MARYLAND-BALTIMORE COUNTY
d23 missouri (st. louis)
d30 illinois-chicago
j4/5 CONNECTICUT
Indiana
n15 ucla (springfield, ma)
n30 BUTLER
d3 NOTRE DAME
d7 KENTUCKY (Indianapolis?)
d10 VANDERBILT
d13-14 INDIANA CLASSIC
(vs. Boston U., and Central Michigan vs. UT-Martin)
d21 st. johns
d27-28 HOOSIER CLASSIC (Indianapolis)
(vs. Texas Tech, and Indiana State vs. Kent)
j4 cincinnati
Iowa
n23 MARYLAND-EASTERN SHORE
n26 WESTERN ILLINOIS
d3 DRAKE
d6-7 AMMANA-HAWKEYE CLASSIC
(vs. Army, and Bowling Green vs. Louisiana Tech)
d10 nothern iowa
d14 iowa st.
d27-28 tribune invitational (florida)
(South Florida vs. NE Illinois, and Butler vs. Iowa)
j4 CENTENARY
Michigan
d2 detroit
d7 cleveland state
d9 CHICAGO STATE
d12 EASTERN MICHIGAN
d14 DUKE
d16 CENTRAL MICHIGAN
d21 RICE
d28-30 red lobster classic (florida)
(Florida vs. Virginia Tech, and BYU vs. Michigan)
Michigan State
n25-27 maui invitational (hawaii)
(Chaminade vs. Providence, Arizona State vs. Rice,
Arkansas vs. Minnesota, Lamar vs. Michigan State)
d4 NEBRASKA
d7 dayton
d14 DETROIT
d17 ILLINOIS-CHICAGO
d21 CINCINNATI
d27-28 SPARTAN OLDS CLASSIC
(vs. Austin Peay, and Sienna vs. Stanford)
Minnesota
n25-27 maui invitational (hawaii)
(Chaminade vs. Providence, Arizona State vs. Rice,
Arkansas vs. Minnesota, Lamar vs. Michigan State)
n30 HOWARD
d2 YOUNGSTOWN STATE
d11 AKRON
d14 alabama-birmingham
d17 DETROIT
d19 memphis state
d23 WEBER STATE
d27-28 far west classic (portland)
(Oregon vs. Minnesota, and LaSalle vs. Oregon State)
Northwestern
n22 ILLINOIS WESLEYAN
n30 COLUMBIA
d2 VANDERBILT
d4 tulane
d14 NORTHEASTERN
d16 IDAHO STATE
d21 loyola of chicago
d27-28 tribune classic (tempe)
(Arizona State vs. Brown, and Creighton vs. Northwestern)
j6 CHICAGO
Ohio State
n26 MIAMI-OHIO
n30 CHICAGO STATE
d4 OHIO UNIVERSITY
d7 OREGON STATE
d14 HOWARD
d18 UC-SANTA BARBARA
d21 southern cal
d29 AMERICAN
j2 PENN STATE
Purdue
n21 BALL STATE (Pre-Season NIT)
n23,27,29 (Possible Pre-Season NIT)
d2 indiana state
d6-7 BOILERMAKER CLASSIC
(vs. Prairie View A&M, and Central Michigan vs. UW-Green Bay)
d15 GEORGIA
d17 STETSON
d21 butler
d23 SW MISSOURI STATE
d28 loyola-chicago (rosemont)
j2 north carolina
j4 WESTERN MICHIGAN
Wisconsin
n23 LOYOLA-CHICAGO
n25 SE MISSOURI STATE
n30 portland
d3 SMU
d5 CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE
d7 COSTAL CAROLINA
d11 nebraska
d13 SAM HOUSTON STATE
d21 HOWARD
d27-30 rainbow classic (hawaii)
(Hawaii vs. Navy, Alabama vs. Bradley,
Fresno State vs. Villanova, Washington State vs. Wisconsin)
j2 MARQUETTE
|
15.456 | Big Ten update 11-21-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Nov 22 1991 22:44 | 26 |
| Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten Update (11-21-91)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1991 23:16:43 GMT
Upcoming Big Ten games:
Nov. 21: Ball State at Purdue, NIT, 6:30 pm CST, ESPN
Nov. 22: Illinois Wesleyan at Northwestern
Nov. 23: Maryland-Eastern Shore at Iowa
Loyola-Chicago at Wisconsin
Possible action for Purdue in NIT (site TBA)
Nov. 25: Penn State at Illinois
Michigan State vs. Lamar; Minnesota vs. Arkansas at Maui
SE Missouri State at Wisconsin
Nov. 26: Western Illinois at Iowa
Miami-Ohio at Ohio State
Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
Nov. 27: Buffalo at Penn State
Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
Possible action for Purdue in NIT at New York
|
15.457 | Big Ten update 11-22-91 | FORTSC::MOK | | Fri Nov 22 1991 22:45 | 52 |
| Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten Update (11-22-91, and it's even Friday)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1991 21:15:53 GMT
Results and Upcoming Big Ten games:
Nov. 20: MICHIGAN STATE 92, Athletes in Action 71
Nov. 21: MICHIGAN 100, Athletes in Action 93 (Romar had 45 for AIA!)
PURDUE 56, Ball State 48: If you love scrappy, hard-nosed
defense, then you loved this game. Purdue's D forced
BSU into all sorts of calamities, mostly very poor shot
selection (the FG % shows it) and inability to get off
shots much before the clock expired. BSU's D forced
Purdue into a boatload of turnovers. There's a silver
lining for both - Purdue got very positive contributions
from some of it's "question marks", namely Matt Waddell,
Cuonzo Martin, and Brandon Brantley. Also, Woody Austin
seemed to get himself loosened up as the game wore on.
If Purdue can play defense like this every time, especially
against a guy like Chandler Thompson (who looked silly at
times), then the team will have chance most nights. For BSU,
the team has nowhere to go but up, and should do quite
well in the MAC and beyond... The halftime score was
26-24 Purdue, and the second half was 30-24 Purdue. The
final margin was the games largest. Waddell hit some
key shots and generally looked good. So did Ian Stanback,
whom Craig Riley could emulate for hustle... A sellout of
14,123 at Mackey Arena. The new floor paintjob looks
great!
Nov. 22: Illinois Wesleyan at Northwestern
Nov. 23: Maryland-Eastern Shore at Iowa
Loyola-Chicago at Wisconsin
Purdue at Oklahoma State in NIT action (no ESPN due to
their football commitments on Saturday)
Nov. 25: Penn State at Illinois
Michigan State vs. Lamar; Minnesota vs. Arkansas at Maui
(the Mn-Ark game is on ESPN at 3:30 pm Central!!!)
SE Missouri State at Wisconsin
Nov. 26: Western Illinois at Iowa
Miami-Ohio at Ohio State
Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
Nov. 27: Buffalo at Penn State
Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
Possible action for Purdue in NIT at New York
|
15.458 | Good news, bad news | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | give me your sweet soul dream | Mon Nov 25 1991 20:33 | 14 |
| Update on Hoosier basketball:
* Chris Reynolds has been un-redshirted. According to
Knight: "He's our best guard, and this team can't play
without its' best guard".
* Damon Bailey's been out since last Wednesday with a
nerve injury.
* Pat Graham is recovering nicely, but they won't be able
to make a decision on whether or not he can play this
season for another couple of weeks.
tom
|
15.459 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | REG. PENNA DEPT. AGR. | Tue Nov 26 1991 10:48 | 10 |
|
From USA Today:
" I like to think that every experiment Edison tried didn't result in
the light bulb."
- IU Coach Bob Knight, changing his mind about redshirting junior
guard Chris Reynolds after a season-opening loss to UCLA.
JD
|
15.460 | Classic Knight ... Why he's the best | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:00 | 19 |
| Bingo !!! And *THAT* is why Bobby Knight is the best college basketball
coach in the country followed up very closely by Mike Krzyzewksi ... and
Roy Williams coming on incredibly fast and strong.
They keep on experimenting and tinkering and refining and perfecting things
until they get it right ... and then they tinker with it all over again.
True *CRAFTSMEN* who are never quite satisfied with success.
And way, way, way back there in the way, way, way back of the bus is the
Snuffer ... refusing to call time outs, refusing to play zones, refusing to
put his senior masons on the bench and, finally and pathetically,
abandoning his team when it needed him most desperately.
Remember the Kansas players after the Carolina game ... "Everybody knew all
the plays so we just improvised better than they did." Do you think
Thomas Edison might have "improvised" just a little bit to get that ol'
lightbulb burning ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.461 | HoFers ride in the back of the bus? Hardly. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:44 | 14 |
| > Remember the Kansas players after the Carolina game ... "Everybody knew all
> the plays so we just improvised better than they did." Do you think
> Thomas Edison might have "improvised" just a little bit to get that ol'
> lightbulb burning ???
So tell me then Mr.Hunt, how come Bobby Knight, "the best college basketball
coach in the country", couldn't find a way to defeat this same Kansas team?
Or at least avoid getting blown out?
Don't tell me. No talent, right?
- ACC Chris
|
15.462 | No brainer | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:38 | 15 |
| - So tell me then Mr.Hunt, how come Bobby Knight, "the best college
- basketball coach in the country", couldn't find a way to defeat this same
- Kansas team? Or at least avoid getting blown out?
That's an easy one. Knight himself stepped up to the podium after
Indiana's loss to Kansas here in Charlotte and admitted that his team had
come as far as it was expected to go.
Knight, by his own admission, had the talent to get to the Sweet Sixteen
and no further. As the Region's No. 2 seed, they were overrated ... again
his own words.
No such words comin' outta Snuffy, were there ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.463 | | CAMONE::WAY | The King of the Droods(tm) | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:49 | 7 |
| >No such words comin' outta Snuffy, were there ???
Bob, it's hard to talk wif a chicken bone stuck in your throat....
hth,
'Saw
|
15.464 | No brain Ketch? I agree ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:10 | 19 |
| > That's an easy one. Knight himself stepped up to the podium after
> Indiana's loss to Kansas here in Charlotte and admitted that his
> team had come as far as it was expected to go.
Hah! In my very best Church_Lady voice, .... "Isn't that
**CONVIENIENT**!"
I can only imagine what the weasel throngs woulda said if the 4th
ranked Tar Heels (we were ranked 5th, BTW. IU was 4th) had gotten
blown out in the Sweet 16 and Dean had said "I didn't expect us to
go any farther". You woulda had a field day.
As it was Dean overachieved in almost everybodies book, taking a very
young and inexperienced bunch to the Final 4 before barely losing to
the identical team. Yet Knight's a genius and Dean rides in the back
of the bus. Get_a clue, Ketch!
- ACC Chris
|
15.465 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Stop Bush/Quayle Wetlands Massacre.. | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:20 | 18 |
|
Chris -
How come when talking about last year - you always say Smith took a
young, inexperienced team, blah, blah blah
BUT
When talking about this year - you talk about all the senior leadership
lost from last year's team.
So, which is it, Soup:
Was last year's team young, or did it have senior experience and
leadership?
Is this year's team young again?
JD
|
15.466 | Last year was a masterpiece by Dean, IMO. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:33 | 14 |
| Both teams were/are young, JD. Last years had five (5) freshmen and
six (6) sophomores. True we did have three (3) senior leaders, but it
was still a young team.
This year we've only got 1 senior, but only 1 frosh. The overall
experience is better (Dean sez practice is going *much* better than
last year cause everybody already knows the plays at least) despite
the lack of senior leadership.
I will say that in '92-93 and '94-95 we should be a very experienced
team, with lots of seniors and juniors.
- ACC Chris
|
15.467 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Pats 16 - Bills 13! WOODYWARD!! | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:46 | 8 |
| So FatBob says we was overrated and the red-sweatered faithful
all holler AMEN! HAHAHAHAHA� By the way Brother_Chris my main
man Rick Fox looks better every game. He came to Boston with a
good knowledge of the fundamentals of roundball. Course every time
he has a bad game you'll hear about it, but rest assured that will
not be often.
/Don
|
15.468 | More ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:50 | 18 |
| - As it was Dean overachieved in almost everybodies book, taking a very
- young and inexperienced bunch to the Final 4 before barely losing to
- the identical team. Yet Knight's a genius and Dean rides in the back
- of the bus. Get_a clue, Ketch!
Yeah, he overachieved big time, didn't he ... The No. 1 seed in the East
plays the Nos. 16, 9, 10, and 12 seeds and you call that *OVER*achieving ???
The first seed he saw in an upper half of any bracket was Kansas and we all
know what happened there.
Should Indiana have lost to Kansas ??? No, probably not. But those two
teams were *MUCH* more evenly matched than the Tar Heels and Kansas.
Carolina, with The Teacher at the helm, should have had few problems
dealing with The Student from Lawrence. Yet, ol' Teach had his rock
chalk Jayhawk handed to him, didn't he ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.469 | 63,000 bankruptcies lasted year but it's still not a recession ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:53 | 7 |
| - True we did have three (3) senior leaders, but it was still a young
- team.
Spin control at its igKnorrant best.
Bob Hunt
|
15.470 | Still "More ..." | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Nov 26 1991 15:21 | 19 |
| Well said, bro_/Don. Well said. I saw where Fox went for something
like 25 the other night, 16 in the 2nd quarter alone!
re: LeftWingBob
Desperately trying to goad me into_a political debate, eh? Wail take
it to SOAPBOX bub, before I sick_a moderator on ya.
As to Dean under/overachieving, it's a rare event to reach the Final 4
and consider the season a disapointment. Let's not make the false
assessment that just cause there were alot of upsets in the East that
it takes away from the achievement. The teams we played (except for
1st round Northeastern) had all beaten somebody good or they wouldn't
have advanced. The fact that we didn't fall victim to an upset like
all the other high seeds is an accomplishment Carolina should be
congratulated for.
- ACC Chris
|
15.471 | Is that excuse number 3 or 4 from the UNC Excuse Book? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Wild Hearted Son | Tue Nov 26 1991 15:40 | 14 |
| >The fact that we didn't fall victim to an upset like
> all the other high seeds* is an accomplishment Carolina should be
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> congratulated** for.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*Duke? UNLV?
Fall victim to an upset? You mean like Kansas beating Indiana? The
same team that beat UNC? Let's see, you criticize Knight for the same
choke job you laud** Smith for. Oh, OK, this fits into "ran into a hot
team" excuse. Sorry. For a minute there I didn't understand.
--dan'l
|
15.472 | Knight lost to Kansas. So friggin' what! | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:15 | 26 |
|
I'll be honest: I don't think Knight had his team ready for that
Kansas game. A team that comes out and plays a sloppy, lackluster,
go-through-the-motions game like that one is a reflection, however
minor, on the coach for that particular outing. Even considering
the talent level, Indiana played as poor a game as Carolina did
against Kansas later. So we'll make no excuses for Knight last
season, even if they're still coming in by the bushelfull from the
other side ("System versus System ==> sloppy game" Haw haw haw!)
I'd even be willing to bet that there have been entire recruiting
classes of kids for whom Knight's total hardass approach just flat
didn't work. They don't want to buy into his system, don't want to
commit, and Knight won't compromise his very high principles. I
have no problem with that. Still doesn't take away from the kids who
do commit, and have pulled down three titles in the last 20 years
because of the level of their commitment to Knight's demands. Still
doesn't explain away all of the wailing and bawling coming out of the
Smif' camp, and the paucity of titles produced by the Rev's lenient,
"go-ahead-and-do-whatever-pleases-you-JR", soft-on-standards-and-
discipline approach. Never hurts to peel away all the bogus
platitudes and gratitudes and examine the ol' bottom line, now
does it?
glenn
|
15.473 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Nov 27 1991 09:31 | 43 |
| What keelt IU in the Kansas game was 1) they didn't have a center
to go up against Kansas' strong front-line, leaving an exhausted,
hurt, and outta position Eric Anderson frozen as they pounded to
the hoop on drives and rebounds, 2) abysmal outside shooting, and
3) the inablity to solve the outside shooting problem by hitting
medium shots and/or close shots. A physical big guy woulda hit the
inside shots, of which they had plenty, but the rejections and tough
D Kansas put on them stopped that approach early.
Of course, MrT predicted all that, and said they were vastly overrated
as a #2 seed and 4th ranked.
This year's Hoosier edition's loss to UCLA exhibited some of the same
weakness with the poor outside shooting. But their inside game will
be better with Alan Henderson and Lindemann. Trouble in that game
comes from relying on those two while still totally inexperienced,
especially Lindemann, who until that day played againsslow 6-2
centers in the Michigan UP. But they'll get better, a lot better.
Henderson will FINALLY give them an inside defensive presence.
Lindemann looks extrememly green, but should be servicble with his
floor game by year's end and could be a good player all 'round by
next year or his junior year with development.
The lousy outside shoong is of grave concern. Last year they won
a Big10 Title against a nuclear widebodied by short Ohio State front-
line by going inside with their quickness. Now OSU has a top ranked
center, and so does Michigan, and Iowa's big main is a year older and
coming into his own. Meanwhile, Minnesotwill feature its most talented
lineup since the Trent Tucker/Randy Bruer daze, with the 7-2 Bruer-like
Bob Martin looking like he'll come into his own with (finally) guards
who cain fill it up and who cain penetrate, and some big-time but
youthful talent along the baseline.
IU's not a dominating team, they're missing a couple of ingredients.
They'll be zoned to death in the Big10. If they don't solve the
outside shooting problem they're hurting Even if they do they'll still
lose some based on having two frosh in featured roles.
Watch out for young Minnesota. They played Arkansas tough the other
day and they beat Providence last night. They're shooting for 4th in
the Big10 and a tourney bid, and it looks like they'll do it.
Big10 Tom
|
15.474 | Stop it already ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Too legit ! Too legit to quit ! | Wed Nov 27 1991 14:25 | 1 |
| Boo hoo hoo ... poor IU ....
|
15.475 | The answer, folks, is that he wasn't playing badly. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Nov 27 1991 14:34 | 9 |
| Yea, I'm cryin' too, but the tears are from laughter. MorT analyzes
the IU-UCLA game and fails to even mention how badly Cheaney played,
despite the fact that his idol-coach sat his All-American butt down for
almost the entire 2nd half!
Haw haw haw!!!!!!1111111
- ACC Chris
|
15.476 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Nov 28 1991 09:51 | 83 |
| I'll igKnorr the catcalls from the Peanut Gallery and take comfort
in knowing that my review is, as always, both objective and a good
indicator of the team's success, and that events will prove me out
to a.... T.
re: Big10
With State roughing up a admittedly short-handed Arkansas and a good
showing by the young but unusually talented Gopher squad, it looks
like the Big10 will be very deep this year. Michigan is rolling out
what's being called "the best freshman class ever," Iowa will be good
but inflexibly coached by Dr. Malpractice, Ohio State has a first team
All-America guard (JJ) and a fine point guard (Baker) and others from
last year to go with transfer Lawrence Funderburke who was thrown off
his H.S. team but was still considered the best schoolboy center his
senior year, and Indiana will be tough despite the outside shooting
and center voids (great coaching) and could become dangerous by year's
end.
Illinois lost their best offensive player Andy Kaufmann to dumb-bunny
disease but has Deon Thomas and some others, but will be down. Ditto
for Purdue, who lost Glenn Robinson - the best player to come out a
Hoosierland since Larry Bird (he smoked Alan Henderson in the IHSAA
Title game - to Prop48. Northwestern will be Northwestern, Wisconsin
will be spotty on the talent level but will win games with the outside
shooting they always seem to have for some reason.
Here's how it should turn out in the ONLY big-time hoops conference
with a real Title to offer:
1. Ohio State
2. State
3. Indiana
4. Michigan
5. Iowa
6. Minnesota
7. Purdue
8. Illinois
9. Wisconsin
10. Northwestern
Of course there's a real chance that haid case Thunderburpe will become
more than disciplinarian Randy Ayers cain put up with dropping State to
centerless status and into 3rd or 4th in the standings. But having a
great one like JJ backed by superquick trey specialist Baker and NOW a
widebody in the middle is compelling.
Jud Heathcoate's great recruiting class has left him with many milirems
of nuclear widebody meat to parlay. Jud cain coach, but last year was
a mystery. Peplowski healthy, nuke forwards, and dashing guards will
be hard to handle.
Bob unredshirted Chris Reynolds in a desperation move, and it should
help. The key here is either GGraham and/or Damon learning how to
shoot with consistency. It's likely Bob will go more with a penetration
game looking for dish-offs to take advantage of Henderson in the paint.
Nover may stay in the middle if he cain minimize the damage he does,
but it might pay off better if he suffers through the huge and problematic
learning curve young Todd Lindemann is facing. Indiana will be good
and bad from game-to-game but should come on turning into the home
stretch.
Michigan is ultratalented and very young. Combine that with "coach"
superstupe Steve Fisher, who'll let 'em run and stay chaotic on both
ends, and you've got a wild card on your hands. This will be a streak
shooting team that could be very dangerous in the tourney.
Iowa better rebound people to death, cuz everybody saw how easy it is
to make mincemeat of this team by passing over their obsolescent full
court press with the clinic CoachK put on Malpractice in Minneapolis
last March. Good center though.
Minnesota will feature freshmen around 7-2 stiff-but-serviceable Bob
Martin. Jumping Jack Voshon Lenard is great. They have two soph 6-8
forwards who cain 'bound and one is smooth with the ball in close.
They have maybe the best outside shooter in the league in a frosh from
Martinsville IN (John Wooden's home town) who should light it up. Weak
point guard from North Carolina who should lose his job during the
season. Clem teaches rebounding and D, and he has his first talented
team ever. Look for the Golden Goofs to post some upsets. I may not
wear the colors to Williams this year.
Big10 Tom
|
15.477 | go buckeyes... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 02 1991 15:55 | 4 |
|
I saw that the Buckeyes struggled over the holidays... what was
the final 111-46 or something like that... Must have been playing
a Division II team or a team from the SWC.
|
15.478 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Dec 04 1991 08:37 | 12 |
|
Calbert Cheaney sure looks like a different ballplayer the last two
games(rebounding, playing D, moving without the ball).
I really didn't think he would survive after Knight sat him during
the basketball game with UCLA. How in the world could any 21 year
man, take such humiliation(insert major sarcasm)?
I'm sure glad that Knight did not let him continue to play poorly, as
it now looks like Calbert is ready to take his game to another level.
Cap
|
15.479 | Yawn. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:02 | 14 |
| re: .-1
This was predictable. Every good game Cheaney has from here on out
we'll be reminded about that genius BobKnight and what a brilliant move
he made to embarass the kid on national TV.
Well bull. The kid was a **preseason All-American**. He's
mega-talented. His success now has ZILCH to do with Bob's stupid
benching, which might've cost him a 'W'.
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
15.480 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:18 | 19 |
| Possible scenario:
Player A reads all his press clippings, thinks he is a superstar and
stops doing all the little things that made him a pre-season
All-American(i.e moving without the ball, playing team defense,
rebounding positioning, etc).
Coach quickly recognizes this and benches player, hoping that it will
cause Player A to go back doing the things that made him great.
Of course since we don't know any of the circumstances that led up to
the benching(i.e events that happened in practices, falling behind on
schoolwork, not working hard in practice or any other number of things)
so we really can't say if the benching was justified or not, can we?
But if Dean would have benched him we wouldn't have heard a peep from
you would we(except for saying what a brilliant move he made).
Cap
|
15.481 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:19 | 15 |
| If Calbert is "mega-talented" then please reconcile his paltry career
statistics as a small forward for rebounds, blocked shots, and assists
in comparison with other star fowards (Larry Johnson might be a good
example to take, he was considered "mega-talented" and is making good
on that claim in the NBA now).
Cheaney is one a the finest pure offensive players Bob's ever had. But,
as a complete player, he has a looooong way to go to measure up to other
top Bob-players such as Isiah, Ted Kitchel, Steve Green, Scott May, et
al.
You don't know what you're talking about.
MrT
|
15.482 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 11:41 | 9 |
| Well, Chris' whole tirade has been predictable. What Calvin should do
is go out, find hissself a good women, and hit her upside the haid a
few times. Then Bob should do nothing about it. That will build
*REAL* character in old Calvin. Then, somewhere down the road, in a
*BIG* game and Calvin is stinking up the joint, shooting with the
accuracy of a sawed-off shotgun, Bobby should jest let him fire away -
damn the final results. Now - that would be genius.
JD
|
15.483 | Suffice to say Cheaney's the only one who'll be humiliated... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:10 | 9 |
| > You don't know what you're talking about.
Then neither does Streets & Smith, which rated Calbert Cheaney first
team All-America. There were only a total of ten (10) players
selected, BTW, and you don't become an All-American by not playing
defense, not having a floor game, and not rebounding.
- ACC Chris
|
15.484 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:19 | 10 |
|
Cap, Dean could only sit Calbert for 10 minutes a game given that he's
a junior. Next year it will be 5 minutes a game. It's part of the
system. It's the way to recruit...
"Well my son if you come to UNC I promise you that every year I will
increase your playing time so as to improve your pro value. Why look
at my track record." - Dean Smith...
mike
|
15.485 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Just say 'HO' | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:41 | 1 |
| What would it be like if Santa was a Hoosier?
|
15.486 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:53 | 10 |
| Soup -
You are way off base in your remark that you don't become an
all-american if you don't play defense, pass, rebound, etc. Most folks
simply look at offense. There have been players that have been
all-american that were pretty dang one-dimensional. Was Pete Maravich
an All-American? I surely don't remember ol' Pete playing much
Defense, or crashing the boards...
JD
|
15.487 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:01 | 9 |
| re: JD
Are you comparing Calbert Cheaney's offense with Pistol Pete's?!
If so, MorT's right. Somebody around here don't know what they'b
talking 'bout.
- ACC Chris
|
15.488 | The Pistol - One of the Greats. | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:43 | 8 |
| Regarding the Pistol.
When you can average 40 ppg, I don't think any coach in the land is
gonna be to concerned about whether you're the best defensive whiz in
the world. Also, last I checked, guards didn't get graded on their
ability to "crash the boards". Unless of course your MAGIC! :-)
WILDCAT
|
15.489 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:15 | 33 |
| You're mixed-up again, ACCrisp. I'm fully aware of S&S and other
mags having posted Calbert as a 1st or 2nd team All-America. So
what? I was addressing the efficacy of Calbert's floor game in
connection with his much deserved benching, which, btw, Calbert
said he deserved and accepted with understanding.
History is littered with A-A's who were offense-only players. You
know who they are. If you don't, just follow the NBA's media during
their camps. Then you'll read quotes from coaches scouts and GMs
talking about how the newly-acquired A-A "needs to learn how to play
defense" or "how to fill the passing lanes" or "how to maintain
position underneath" or "how to help out on weak side D" or "how to
make the adjustment to full time man-to-man" or "how to hit the glass
on offense" or "how to fight his way through picks" or "how to set
picks" and so on.
Calbert was judged and benched based on his real-world performance with
the floor game. He's been in and out of the dog house both with the
press and the Indiana media for two years now for disappearing on
defense and on the boards. He's also been busted for trying to showboat
and trying to go coast-to-coast with the ball, which he tried against
Ohio State only to have it stripped at midcourt thus blowing last year's
double OT loss to a superior Buckey team.
In sum, he's been sat down before and he deserved it. Based on the
fack that Calbert understands he's screwing up and Bob's track record
for player development, I look for a well-rounded Cheaney by his senior
year.
I believe this cuz if Bob could mould the gawky slow-footed Jay Edwards
into a serviceable defensive guard and rebounder anything's possible.
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.491 | here's the proof | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:34 | 36 |
| Just to refresh the memory.
>================================================================================
>Note 15.483 Big Ten Basketball 483 of 490
>RHETT::KNORR "Carolina Blue" 9 lines 4-DEC-1991 12:10
> -< Suffice to say Cheaney's the only one who'll be humiliated... >-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > You don't know what you're talking about.
>
> Then neither does Streets & Smith, which rated Calbert Cheaney first
> team All-America. There were only a total of ten (10) players
> selected, BTW, and you don't become an All-American by not playing
> defense, not having a floor game, and not rebounding.
> - ACC Chris
So Chris - notice - you make assertion about what makes an all-american.
>Note 15.486 Big Ten Basketball 486 of 490
>RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Macaulay Culkin makes me puke!" 10 lines 4-DEC-1991 12:53
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Soup -
< You are way off base in your remark that you don't become an
< all-american if you don't play defense, pass, rebound, etc. Most folks
> simply look at offense. There have been players that have been
> all-american that were pretty dang one-dimensional. Was Pete Maravich
> an All-American? I surely don't remember ol' Pete playing much
< Defense, or crashing the boards...
> JD
Notice - no comparison to Cheaney (who isn't even mentioned).
|
15.492 | after correcting a mistake... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:35 | 27 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 15.490 Big Ten Basketball 490 of 491
RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Macaulay Culkin makes me puke!" 21 lines 4-DEC-1991 14:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris -
Get real willya bud.
No where did I compare or say that Cheaney was the offensive equal of
the Pistol.
Lets refresh that baby blue memory. You said that no way does a person
make all-american unless they excel at all aspects of the game. I
called you on it, saying that isn't always the case - and that of all
the aspects of the game, folks are most impressed with offensive
numbers. I then used Pistol Pets as an EXAMPLE (not a comparison to
Cheaney) of a player that was an all-american, yet did not excel in all
aspects of the game - thereby proving your assertion false. And I'm
sure Pistol Pete isn't the only all-american that was on the team based
on pure offensive abilities.
So, once again you make a general statement, get called on it - and
then try to squirm out of it by twisting the original note around.
jd
|
15.493 | Will JD continue to Obfuscate? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:48 | 23 |
| Just what in the heck are you going on about, JD? You're worried about
the boat needing a new paint job when it's just struck an iceburg and
is settling to the bottom of the Atlantic.
Why not address (specifically and directly, if possible) the following:
A. According to college hoops experts, Calbert Cheaney is one of the
TEN (10) best players in the USA.
B. Despite not even playing that badly, Fight (tm) sat him on his
butt for almost the entire 2nd half against UCLA, therefore
eliminating any possibility for Indiana to win.
The *only* reasonable defense I've read from anybody is from Cap,
who agrees with me that Knight's inexplicably benching was, indeed,
inexplicable, and that there must be forces at work that we don't know
about. (i.e. missed class, injury, etc.) If this proves to be the
case I assure you I will offer complete and forthright apologies all
the way around.
- ACC Chris
|
15.494 | Spin, spin, spin.. | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:54 | 15 |
| I'm not obfuscating, oh Soupster. You made a calim that you don't make
all-american unless you can play good de, rebound, etc. I called you
on it. You then tried to claim I compared Cheaney to Maravich - and I
proved you wrong on that point.
So now you are in spin control at its finest. You couldn't grasp
that someone would play your game of calling folks on generalities -
and you don't have a clue on how to answer (BTW - all you needed to say
is you were wrong, and let it go...) so you are spinning and spinning
and bringing up Bob's benching of Cheaney - which has nothing to do
with your general claim about All-Americans or my rebuttal.
The floor's waxed Soup - start spinning some more.
JD
|
15.495 | Another example of an incomplete A-A ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:20 | 18 |
| � History is littered with A-A's who were offense-only players. You
� know who they are. If you don't, just follow the NBA's media during
� their camps. Then you'll read quotes from coaches scouts and GMs
� talking about how the newly-acquired A-A "needs to learn how to play
� defense" or "how to fill the passing lanes" or "how to maintain
� position underneath" or "how to help out on weak side D" or "how to
� make the adjustment to full time man-to-man" or "how to hit the glass
� on offense" or "how to fight his way through picks" or "how to set
� picks" and so on.
You mean like when former Hornets coach Gene Littles wondered out loud why
JR Reid didn't know the fundamental "screen-and-roll" play ???
Heck, and that's an *offensive* play that our young A-A didn't know. The
mind can only boggle at what he didn't (and still doesn't) know about big
time defense.
Bob Hunt
|
15.496 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:24 | 21 |
| >Cap, who agrees with me that Knight's inexplicably benching, was,
>indeed, inexplicable.
Shameless. Cap agreed to no such inexplication. In fack, Cap
*explained* the benching, and quite well thank you.
You're least worst off by just leaving it as you originally framed it:
1) That this was the first star benching ever
2) That Calbert wasn't playing that badly
3) That it all happened cuz Bob is insane.
At least then, with the exception of 1) above, you're in the element
you like best, that is, pure subjectivity.
Btw, who are *you* to carp on so about substitutions? Need I remind
you of 93 substitutions in a certain Final Four upset loss and the role
it played? Where Bob's benching made perfect sense, this unnamed
"coach's" 92 benchings were madness when the clutch was down.
MrT
|
15.497 | | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:38 | 13 |
|
Chris, let me ask you an honest question. What do you care if Knight
did indeed sacrifice an opening game victory to drive home a lesson
for later on? Weren't you crediting Smith with some such genius last
year over a decision on man-to-man versus zone in an early-season game?
What's the difference? (And don't bring up that humiliation nonsense,
since we've already heard that Cheaney agreed with the benching,
and it's widely recognized that such an action is effective in the
personal development of young players in spite of that kiss-and-make-up
psychobabble you and Wildcat have been throwing around...)
glenn
|
15.498 | Machine Gun attack on BobDisciples | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:49 | 33 |
| > it's widely recognized that such an action is effective ...
"Widely recognized", glenn? There's not a coach in the USA who
would've benched Cheaney for almost an entire half like Knight did
based on his performance. (Which wasn't that bad.) None. No one.
Nada.
The fact that Cheaney "agreed with the benching" was a MrT quote, which
means it's inheriently unreliable. Even if he really did say this it
doesn't surprise me. Knight's got him in_a sleeper hold, eligibility-wise.
He either plays by Knights rules or effectively ends his collegiate
career, since transferring at this point is a desperate option.
re: MorT
Cap has *repeatedly* admonished me for not being fully aware of the
facts surrounding the Cheaney benching. Why else would he say this
unless he himself drew the same conclusion I did. Namely, that Bob
had some other reason to intentionally not try to win a game, cause
Calbert sure wasn't playing that poorly.
re: JD
I congratulate you JD for snookering me into_a whirlwind of
obfuscation. In the battle of trivial nonsense, you're the winner.
Sadly (for you) though we must increment your "L" column in this
Bob war, cause his bench coaching in the UCLA game was horrid and
his handling of his best player inexcusable.
- ACC Chris
|
15.499 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:58 | 22 |
| Chris -
Do you know every coach in the USA personally - and absolutely ,
positively *know* as *fact* that not one other coach in the USA would
have benched Cheaney? Or is that your *opinion* that every other coach
would have let poor ol Calvin play? Remember, Chris - opinions aren't
fact. Seems that you are guilty of the same crimes you blam others
for....
In fact - this whole thang is based on your opinion, and your main main
Dick Vitale. That, my amigo, does not make it gospel. And isn't it
your opinion that Calvin wasn't playing badly, against others opinion
that he wasn't playing all-around ball - and that opinion includes Bob
Knight - he of 3 titles, a gold, and HOF credentials.
And nice double pump spin move admitting you were wrong - and then
somehow tying that to the loss to UCLA. Spin control that Ronny,
georgie and Deanie would simply admire!
Kudos.
JD
|
15.500 | William Kennedy Smith could use a main like you, JD. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:01 | 8 |
| You'd make a great lawyer, JD ...
But a tewible basketball analyst.
- ACC Chris
|
15.501 | Teaching Fundamentals 101 | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:03 | 24 |
| Tsk, Tsk, Tsk gentlemen. Let's see if I can say this so that everyone
grasps it.
Ok, real slow now, ready?
As stated previously (pause)... Bob Knight could've done a (pause)...
much better job of (pause)... teaching if he had taught (pause)...
young Calbert during the game (pause)... rather than waiting (pause)...
several days later in practice.
It really has nothing to do with the young Calbert's emotional health.
It's fact that he would've learned more however if Knight had used the
game as a teaching opportunity. Sit him for a few minutes, and then
bring him back in the game to *LEARN*.
That's the end of todays lesson. Next week, will explain why they took
the bottom out of the peach basket!
Many :-)'s
WILDCAT
|
15.502 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:04 | 29 |
|
Chris,
If you going to speak on my behalf than please don't lie....
Coaches bench star players all the time(it happens in HS, it happens
in College, it happens Pro Sports, it happens in Rec league's, etc).
This usually occurs due to a lack of effort or lack of performance
either during the game or it is built up over the course of
time(previous practices, games, etc). The goal of a move like this
is to show the player that if they are not going to play up to their
capabilities and provide 100% effort than they are going to sit the
bench. IU was not going to win with Cheaney playing that poorly.
He was playing extremely poorly on defense and was not moving at all
without the ball(thus not getting any open shots).
My premise is that Cheaney was playing poorly(which he was) and that
you can't make the case that Knight sole mission was to humiliate
Cheaney without knowing ANY OF THE FACTS that might have led up to
this benching. Being ignorant of the possibility of other issues
involved in this situation, I just wanted to remind you to look at
the whole picture.
You can keep up with the Knight humiliating Cheaney charade if you
want, it doesn't bother me any. It just gives alot of people the
opportunity to make you look bad.
Cap
|
15.503 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:10 | 15 |
|
Wildcat that is a perfectly viable teaching alternative and perhaps
Knight should have done it that way, but since we don't know what
motivates Calbert(and we should presume Knight knows since he has
molded him into the player he is), than we really can't knock Knight's
coaching techniques unless Calbert goes into the tank this year(and
judging by his last two performances, I'd say Knight's technique worked
quite well).
Chris, on the other hand, took this opportunity to try and paint this
move as sinister and that it would affect Calbert's psyche, which
is a completely inaccurate statement without knowledge of all the facts
within this situation.
Cap
|
15.504 | Congrats, Chris, for never answering my question! | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:13 | 1 |
|
|
15.505 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:17 | 9 |
| Cap, you made a good point about us not knowing what motivates Calbert.
Perhaps he had gotten a swelled head from press clippings.
Anyway... I'll get to see the boys in person this Saturday at the
Hoosier Dome.
GO CATS!
WILDCAT
|
15.506 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:56 | 12 |
| Rope, you're living in Kaintuck or Mecca? Wish I could be there.
It's on national TV. The UK-IU hoops rivalry may be the most
storied, longlived, and bitter in the game.
Hey, if you're in Kaintuck watch out. Word from Mecca is that
the Indiana State Troopers are gonna be running a roadblock at
the I-65 bridge over the Ohio checking for passports and green
teef'.
Good luck!
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.507 | Talk about your humiliations ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Fenestracryptographer Wannabe | Wed Dec 04 1991 16:58 | 15 |
| � Weren't you crediting Smith with some such genius last year over a
� decision on man-to-man versus zone in an early-season game?
It was not an early season game. It was the final regular season game of
the year against hated Duke at home in the Deandome with the ACC regular
season title at stake. And it was Senior Day ... On TV for all to see ...
And Snuff said afterwards (a loss) that he refused to play zone because
he's too stubborn to do so in Chapel Hill and because he thought they
needed to work on their man-to-man.
And, of course, the Faithful all opened up their hymnals to the same old
dog-eared page.
Bob Hunt
|
15.508 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Dec 04 1991 17:04 | 10 |
| Wildcat,
Have a blast, remember to wear red and white.... :-)
Should be a very exciting game(I love watching games that involve
Pitino because his teams are exciting to watch play). It will be
interesting to see what Pitino devises to free up his 3-point shooters
for easy shots(a problem they had the last time they played IU).
Cap
|
15.509 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Macaulay Culkin makes me puke! | Wed Dec 04 1991 17:38 | 9 |
| Chris -
So - you get called to the carpet a couple of times trying to pass off
your biased opinions as facts - and all you can come up with is a
faintly veiled insult thrown my way. Nice going bub. So - still
wondering - how do you know that *every* other coach in the USA would
not have benched Calvin?
JD
|
15.510 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Dec 05 1991 09:00 | 24 |
| It seems that Rick knows he has a nuclear widebody mogambo stud in
Mashburn and is gonna use him. That could be a bigger threat to IU.
Allegedly 6-8 no particularly strong, quick, coordinated, quick-jumping,
good-shooting, good-ball-handling, or otherwise skilled Matt Nover will
look to survive against Mash on D and to not turn the ball over more
than five times on offense. If Mash runs wild jamming and blocking
shots and rebounding and passing that will put IU on their heels and
finally open up the trey too.
However, if Nover survives the IU system could hold up nicely. Also,
if he flops - as he did many times last year against top centers, Bob
might opt for the 3-guard lineup and take on the Mildcats with quickness.
Note: Eric Anderson and Damon Bailey did not start against Notre Dame.
My speculation is that Damon was sat for his poor outside shooting and
inability to do anything on the floor against UCLA's quick guards.
Don't know why Anderson was sat. Quick defensive-minded Chris Reynolds
started for Damon and budding star Alan Henderson started for Anderson.
Maybe he should start Anderson in the middle. He'd get into fould
trouble against MonsterMash but he'd be a heckuva lot better than the
awful Matt Nover...
MrT
|
15.511 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Thu Dec 05 1991 09:54 | 9 |
| 'T, I suspect that you'll see Anderson at his usual forward spot on
offense, then on defense he will guard the Monster Mash. UK still has
major problems at the other two spots on the front line.
Also, Tuesday, UK lost a major player. Starting guard Jeff Brassow,
the best player in the motion offense was lost for the season with a
serious knee injury. :-( Brassow's loss will be tough to overcome.
WILDCAT
|
15.512 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | G.Bush, unconvicted criminal | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:05 | 9 |
| > Also, Tuesday, UK lost a major player. Starting guard Jeff Brassow,
> the best player in the motion offense was lost for the season with a
> serious knee injury. :-( Brassow's loss will be tough to overcome.
Richie Farmer stepped in and filled the void rather effectively last night
I'd say. I like Farmer I think he brings a more well rounded game to the
floor than Brassow. He is more of a liability defensively though...
Mash warmed up with 28 last night T, think Matt's shaking??
|
15.513 | A larnin year fer Irish | CTHQ2::LEARY | Better than LDS | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:26 | 9 |
| Thanks T,
I needed to hear that IU started out wif one hand tied loosely
behind the back whilst slappin' poor Irish 'round with big
1st half lead THEN bringin' in studs to slap Irish 'round more
in second half. 32 points, tis embarraskin. Man, and I cain't wait
till this squad travels to Lexington. Whew.
MikeL
|
15.514 | Sadam Hussan Debate Tactics 101 | ANGLIN::KIRKMAN | Back to shoveling snow again (Uugh) | Thu Dec 05 1991 11:29 | 21 |
| 1. If winning - Declare glorious victory. Remind your opponent of this
debate repeatedly during every other debate. Attempt to prolong the debate.
2. If evenup - Declare glorious victory. Quietly move to the next debate.
3. If losing - Stall. Ignore your opponent's points. Complicate the issue.
Reinvoke old won debates. Change the subject. At a later time, declare
glorious victory.
How is this related to Big Ten Basketball you ask?
Sounds like the recent Bob vs. Dean discussions
;-) 8-)
Scott
P.S. My tongue-in-cheek aggreement with John Hendry. The discussion can be
interesting, but can get old real fast.
|
15.515 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Dec 05 1991 12:19 | 16 |
| re: MikeL
This is the worst Irish team since Digger had to use football players
way back when. Awful, but they'll get better. Bob ran his players
cuz IU is in disarray as far as who's gonna step forward and run the
system in several roles.
re: Scott and John Hendry
Let me be blunt. Those of us involved in the Grate Debate don't give
a damn what you think of the rathole. If you don't like it, butt out.
That's why we have N.U. keys. Use 'em. Quit clogging our hoops notes
up with non-sports-related egotistical political diatribes about what
great writers you are.
MrT
|
15.516 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Thu Dec 05 1991 16:05 | 31 |
| re .506
>> Rope, you're living in Kaintuck or Mecca? Wish I could be there.
>> It's on national TV. The UK-IU hoops rivalry may be the most
>> storied, longlived, and bitter in the game.
'T, I've lived in both. However, I'm currently located in Dayton, OH
(YAWN) :-) Certainly agree with you about the rivalry. The games are
always hotly contested. It may be the most important game of the year
for the fans of both programs. As far as UK goes, the only other teams I
like to see them beat consistently is Louisville, and maybe LSU. Any
win over IU is sweet for UK and vice versa.
re .508
Wildcat,
Have a blast, remember to wear red and white.... :-)
Should be a very exciting game(I love watching games that involve
Pitino because his teams are exciting to watch play). It will be
interesting to see what Pitino devises to free up his 3-point
shooters
for easy shots(a problem they had the last time they played IU).
Cap
Cap, blue and white and you've got a deal! Should be a very intense
ballgame.
- WILDCAT
|
15.517 | Cheaney had 4 fouls, btw | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Dec 05 1991 22:46 | 18 |
| T,
Anderson didn't get the start because of poor work habits in practice.
According to Ellenberger, Eric was so fidgety sitting next to him on
the bench that he could hardly concentrate on the game, and told him
that Knight had gotten his attention.
Bailey seems to still be feeling the effects of the foot injury over
the summer, and the back(?) injury that forced him to sit out the
game against the Soviets. Even if he was healthy, Reynolds would
be starting (Knight says he's their best guard), and Graham has
improved enough that Bailey might not be able to beat him out for
the starting spot.
Defending the 3s will be the key against the Mildcats, I expect.
When the 3s don't work, the rest of their offense seems to fall apart.
tom
|
15.518 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Dec 06 1991 08:33 | 7 |
| Any word on Lindemann's progress? I see that Nover is still starting
and getting the minutes, but that Lindemann's been doing backup time.
But Alan Henderson... ahhhh. Probably the best player at IU since
Isiah. We'll see.
MrT
|
15.519 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 09:18 | 20 |
| > <<< Note 15.517 by CSOA1::SIMPSON_T "In search of mythical kings" >>>
> -< Cheaney had 4 fouls, btw >-
Well we finally have a good reason why Cheaney sat(outside of his
horrible play), he sat in the 2nd half due to foul problems and the
game was not within reach by the time Knight was ready to send him
back in.
Knight probably felt that if they could have come within 10 by the
10 minute mark than Cheaney could be brought back in, however the
spread was 20 or so points at that time, so why risk injury to your
star player in a game that you are going to most likely lose anyway.
Now let's see if ACChris is a man of his word(he says he always admits
to mistakes and offers a public apology).
Get in here, Chris.....
|
15.520 | Oops ... I should say Simpson instead of Cap Yawn anyhow | LUNER::BROOKS | Stardate 12.06.91 - BE THERE ! | Fri Dec 06 1991 13:49 | 6 |
| Cap, why did wait a full 2 weeks to offer this piece of obvious
evidence ?
Asuming of course, that it really cain be considered evidence ...
Doc
|
15.521 | Anybody got a tape of this game? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:13 | 6 |
| Really, Doc. Besides the fact that I don't think this is correct.
Maybe Bob *thought* he had four (4) fouls, but to the best of my
recollection Cheaney didn't have 4.
- ACC Chris
|
15.522 | That was my assumption, anyways ... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:27 | 6 |
| > -< Cheaney had 4 fouls, btw >-
Cap,
Don't you think this refers to the Notre Dame game, since the
rest of the note also refers to the IU-Irish game ?
|
15.523 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:32 | 57 |
| Doc,
For once, please, show me you can add something intellegent to one
of these conversations.....
ACChris,
Good person to align yourself with(Doc), really helps out your
credibility..... :-)
I think a public expression of your error is required here(at least
if your BIG enough to admit when you are wrong).
Here's what we have:
o A noter enters in the fact that Cheaney had 4 fouls(which I believe
is correct because Cheaney did start the 2nd half against UCLA),
which would more than justify Calbert sitting.
o Cheaney for his skills was having a terrible game, shooting poorly
without the ball, not moving without the ball on offense, getting
burned on defense and committing stupid turnovers.
o We have a direct quote that Anderson sat against Notre Dame due to
poor practice habits and work, something that could have justified
Knight sitting Cheaney.
You have accused Knight of intentionally trying to humiliate Cheaney
on national TV, although you can produce absolutely no evidence of this
happening. Also there was no outcry about this in the national papers
or the media. We only had Dick Vitale say that Knight could not win
without Cheaney, but he did not mention anything about humiliating
Cheaney.
Now it's amazing how cowardly you are in dealing with this situations
and other questions that have been asked of you(the so-called objective
analyst).
- You have failed to document any facts behind Knight's supposed
humiliation(don't say past behaviour because I also asked you
to document any incident in the last 3 years that paints Knight in a
bad light).
- You have failed to answer even the simplest questions concerning
the failures of your favorite program, falsely claiming that they
have been answered in the past.
- You fail to acknowledge an obvious mistake. I'll be the first to
admit that Knight was wrong if he tried to humiliate Cheaney, but
I don't think he did and you have offered not even one piece of
evidence that supports your crazed accusations.
Now either offer up evidence that Knight did this on purpose or show
us your a man of your words and admit your error.
Cap
|
15.524 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:40 | 25 |
| >Cap,
>Don't you think this refers to the Notre Dame game, since the
>rest of the note also refers to the IU-Irish game ?
Yes that might be the case but it since no reference was made to
Cheaney in that note and since this note has been dedicated lately to his
benching, I assumed that this was the case.
If not I was wrong in my assumption and I'll admit it, it still doesn't
stop the fact that Chris has offered up no evidence that Knight was
purposely trying to humiliate Cheaney.
Having 4 fouls would just be one variable in what might have caused the
extended benching, it might be simpler if I just ask the simple
question:
ACChris, Do you know any of what went on prior to or during the game
that may or may not have justified Calbert's benching and do you have
any evidence that Knight was purposedly attempting to humiliate
Cheaney?
Let's see if he has the backbone to answer that simple question.
Cap
|
15.525 | As MrT sez, nothin' worse than a mistaken correction! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 14:50 | 4 |
| Haw haw haw!!!!1111
- ACC Chris
|
15.526 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:00 | 15 |
|
I have not admitted that was a mistake, no question was asked about
Cheaney concerning the ND game, he has only been mentioned in
conjunction with the UCLA game so it is most likely that he was
referring to the UCLA game.
I had already thought of this premise before I entered in my note
and if I was wrong in my assumption I will admit.
Anyway if it thrills you to gloat over false victories so be it,
I'm still waiting for you to grow a backbone and answer the questions
put forth or can't you have an intellegent, objective basketball
conversation?
Cap
|
15.527 | Prediction: Indiana 76, Mildcats 69 | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:19 | 21 |
| All,
Sorry for any confusion. I thought it would be obvious that I was
referring to the UCLA game.
Chris,
I *HAD* a tape of the game and verified this after coming back from a
trip and reading the plethora of notes concerning poor humiliated
Calbert. Can't say that I have it now, though. Not exactly a game
I'd want to watch over, and over, and over.
By the way, I in no way consider this evidence for anything, since
I don't have any desire to take part in this "discussion". It's
simply a fact that hopefully will help people move on to better
arguments.
tom
|
15.528 | Any public admission of error Chris????? | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:24 | 9 |
| >By the way, I in no way consider this evidence for anything, since
>I don't have any desire to take part in this "discussion". It's
>simply a fact that hopefully will help people move on to better
>arguments.
I agree 100%, thanks for the inputs and the dagger that killed off
this charade that was being played.
Cap
|
15.529 | The documented evidence has been lost? Hmmm ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:25 | 5 |
| Seems funny Tom that ESPN never picked up on this fact. I never heard
a single mention of Cheaney being in foul trouble.
- ACC Chris
|
15.530 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:29 | 10 |
| Tom,
Any word on how Reynolds and Meeks played against Notre Dame. I think
they are the key to breaking Kentucky's pressure. Also has Greg
Graham's ballhandling skills improved any? It looks like he's improved
an outside shot which probably would keep Bailey on the bench.
Thanks,
Cap
|
15.531 | ESPN and Vitale: unimpeachable sources... | GUSHER::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:40 | 12 |
|
> Seems funny Tom that ESPN never picked up on this fact. I never heard
> a single mention of Cheaney being in foul trouble.
Well, Crisp, you know how accurate and thorough your buddy Dick
Vitale can be when he gets on one of his tangents, what with the
likes of his assessment of the Big East as the superior conference in
the country and of Eric Montross being the wrong player in the wrong
system...
glenn
|
15.532 | The Truth and Objectivity are all I'm ever after. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:57 | 21 |
| Never said ESPN/Vitale are unimpeachable glenn, although I will say I
find Dickie to be a breath of fresh air in terms of speaking openly and
honestly. (A rare breed on the tube, to say the least ...)
What we have here is a factual discrepency that needs correction. *IF*
it turns out Cheaney was indeed in foul trouble and got yanked cause of
that (and didn't reenter the game cause IU was already blown out) then:
o I'm right about Cheaney not playing that badly.
o MrT is dead wrong about Cheaney playing badly.
o BobKnight made a poor coaching move to not get Calbert back in the
game before it was too late.
All things considered, I'd be more than happy to admit I erred in
saying Fight (tm) was trying to humiliate Calbert. (Again, assuming
somebody can lay their hands on the game tape to verify the 4 fouls...)
- ACC Chris
|
15.533 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:05 | 32 |
| Haa. Turns out that once again ACCrock was caught operating without
a clue on what he was blabbing about and he got cold-busted. And not
only won't he admit his most egregious error, he's implying that the
superobjective t_Simpson is a lie. Sad.
Hey, Crock-o'-Holic: You ever gonna answer Cap's fine questions? Or
are you skeert. [no and yes]
Now that we've managed to put this little imbroglio behind us, MrT
wants to axe a_overarching question:
Do you think Bob will stick with the awful Matt Nover or
will he throw in the towel and move over to starting a
3-guard lineup?
re: Minnesota
Look for this squad to pull some upsets. 6-4 frosh Voshon Lenard is
causing a stir with his play, 6-8 240 widebody Randy Carter is racking
up boards and tossing in points from the paint, and 7-2 senior Bob
Martin's listless play has ended with his diagnosis and treatment of
a sever iron deficiency. Townsend Orr is playing very well, and so are
most of the frosh, my fave being 6-9 small forward Chad Kolander.
Clem cain coach, and these guys are gonna roll.
re: Michigan
The numbers for the "best frosh class ever" over their first games
have been mind-blowing. 17 rebounds by Chris Webber? Whoa.
MrT
|
15.534 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:20 | 6 |
| 'T, why would IU go to a three guard lineup? I suspect you'll see
Henderson starting and Anderson moving to center. True, may not be the
ideal slot for Anderson, but many teams including UK would kill to have
a player of Eric's ability in the middle.
WILDCAT
|
15.535 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:26 | 19 |
| Dunno for sure, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Bob is committed
to playing Eric at forward full-time, finally, to give him the best
shot at the NBA. Anderson's sacrificed a lot in terms of stats and
physical punishment by playing in the middle. Also, when up against
bigger and/or quicker middlement Eric usually gets into early foul
trouble. He's just not a good center. And when he goes to the bench
late in the first half with 3 PFs it has a nasty effect on the team's
overall play, especially at offensive end. On the other hand, IU does
have some depth at forward now with Alan, so maybe Bob'll do it.
I agree, I'd prefer to see Anderson at center. If not that, then
play Lindemann full-time and suffer through the learning curve.
But if anything thus far it looks like Anderson/Henderson/Cheany
splitting time at the two F slots and Nover/Lindemann in the post.
Yucky.
MrT
|
15.536 | No title for this reply | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:27 | 16 |
| Chris,
ESPN reported it as Cheaney's fourth when the foul occurred, but
as far as I could tell Vitale and the other guy never mentioned
it during the rest of the game.
Cap,
Reynolds is playing very well, although the shooting is still a real
problem. The coaching staff thinks Meeks is playing a lot better
just trying to keep up with him.
Graham's made a lot of improvements, but so far this year they're
still keeping the ball out of his hands as much as possible.
tom
|
15.537 | IU should handle the Cats easily, IMO. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:28 | 10 |
| I can understand why you'd wanna drop the whole thing MorT, seeings how
you thought he got benched cause of horrendous play! Haw!!
Since ESPN never reported on the four (4) fouls I made the logical
assumption that Bob was in the midst of one of his notorious
and well-documented humiliation campaigns. Instead it just turns out
that he did a lousy coaching job. Oh well ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.538 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:38 | 13 |
| We don't want to drop anything. It just turns out that you made a
horrible mistake and in light a your repeated claims to "objective
analyst" status we expect you to admit your mistake and maybe even
apologize for the way you handled things.
Btw, in keeping with things turning out the way MrT had predicted
them UCLA is now the 2nd ranked team in the country. And rightfully
so, they're probably the most talented team out there. And they have
the best shot at nabbing the Title from the nation's best team, the
Duke Blue Devils led by pretty boy Teutonic dream boat Christian Laettner
and that ugly little Irish point guard.
MrT
|
15.539 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:46 | 14 |
| The thing that worries me about tomorrows game is the play of John
Pelphrey. He just hasn't looked good at all the last two games. I
believe UK can win tomorrow if they shoot well (at least 50%). One big
problem in my mind could be Alan Henderson. If you assume that Mash
has to take Anderson, who takes Henderson? One of the Frosh
(Timberlake or Rhodes)? That along with how well they do defensively
on Cheney may determine the outcome of the game.
My buddy and I will leave Dayton farily early tomorrow morning so that
we are in Indy for any pre-game festivities, etc. The Hoosier dome
will be electric tomorrow. IU-UK is truly an exciting contest no
matter how each team is doing. I'll give a report Monday morning.
WILDCAT
|
15.540 | Who's televising IU vs. Kaintuck tomorrow? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:51 | 15 |
| > horrible mistake
Speaking of horrible mistakes, what about *yours*, insisting that
Calbert was having a **TERRIBLE** game and therefore wholly deserved
a 2nd half benching.
> horrible mistake
Speaking of horrible mistakes, what about *Bob's*, who left Calbert
on the bench just long enough for IU to never have a chance to win
the game.
- ACC Chris
|
15.541 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Fri Dec 06 1991 17:02 | 4 |
| Chris, I believe CBS will be televising the game at 3:45. Can't figure
the wierd start time.
WILDCAT
|
15.542 | A little too early..... | POCUS::SALTALAMACCH | | Sat Dec 07 1991 08:45 | 6 |
| Re: a few back...
Rhodes...Isn't he a senior in HS who has committed to KU?
Redmen Phil
|
15.543 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Sun Dec 08 1991 13:36 | 16 |
| >horrible mistake
>>... what about yours?
Whaddya blabbing about now Crockmeister. Calbert was having a awful
game, had four fouls, was deservedly benched, and by the time to come
back the game was a out a reach blowout so why risk injuring Calbert
when you could give some gbage time to young Henderson?
Y mouthed off about Bob being a insane maniac and didn't even know
he was burdened with 4 fouls.
Shame on you for your abject inability to admit the error a your ways
and to apologize.
MrT
|
15.544 | AP/UPI/CNN polls to Bob: "Bye bye!" [Haw haw!!11] | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:14 | 8 |
| Dick Vitale's pre-season #1-ranked Indiana Hoosiers dropped their 2nd
game of the year this Saturday, losing a virtual home game to the hated
Kentucky Wildcats by a deuce.
Just thought y'all would want to know.
- ACC Chris
|
15.545 | Indiana is a poor-shooting finesse team | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:15 | 23 |
| The Kaintuck game was a good one, but, sadly, it was total and bitter
vindication for poor MrT:
Billy Packer: "It should be obvious to any IU fan what the two major
weaknesses of the Hoosier team are."
Billy Packer: "Indiana doesn't have a center."
Bob: "We really don't have an inside game to speak of, so we
worked on defense to keep the ball from Mashburn if
possible while jumping out on the three point shooters,
and looked to get the ball to Cheany for good shots from
the wing."
Billy Packer: "Indiana needs somebody to step up and hit the perimeter
shots. They're getting good shots from outside, but
don't seem to have a guy who can hit them except for
Cheany. They're not a good outside shooting team at all."
Billy Packer: "Mashburn is dominating inside. What's going to happen to
Indiana this year against teams with big people inside?"
Big10 Tom: "Told you so."
|
15.546 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:30 | 37 |
| Bob may have answered my question about what type of lineup he'll
go with to mask the Hoosiers' obvious talent shortfalls. He started
forward Eric Anderson at center and 6-2 guard Damon Bailey at forward,
thus opening up the 2nd guard spot for Chris Reynolds. This left them
running:
F - 6-6
F - 6-2
C - 6-8
G - 6-1
G - 6-4
This worked well against Pitino's trapping press, but Bob was forced
to bring in Matt Nover when Mash starting tearing the place up, twice
actually getting the eye-popping mismatch against 6-0 Jamaal Meeks on
the post and turning 3-point plays on both. Pitino initally started
out working the outside game but soon recognized that Mash could have
his way against the small front-line IU was using, especially where
switches were forced... so he started running a motion offense on the
baseline to force switches and it worked like a charm.
Pitino from the outset challenged IU's guards to shoot, which also was
smart.
I steal take some comfort in the fack that IU was able to go down to
the wire against a fine team like Kaintuck with a Monster like Mash.
But if the Hoosiers aren't going to come up with a viable center in
Lindemann (and he must be pretty bad if he's unable to beat out Nover,
who when recruited was viewed as a 3rd string foward type) then they
MUST come up with somebody who cain shoot from the outside besides
Calbert.
Also, it's looking more and more like Damon's threatened with a 2nd
string role behind Reynolds and GGraham, who are far superior athletes.
Big10 Tom
|
15.547 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:43 | 9 |
| MrT:
While watching the game, I noticed that on several occasions Anderson
and Cheney made shots about a foot inside the three point line. Pitino
jumps down the players throats if they take a shot inside the line.
His philosophy is if you're that close, take a step back, and get the
three. Both Anderson and Cheney can hit the shot. Why not take it?
WILDCAT
|
15.548 | Honest question to_a Honest discrepency | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:58 | 10 |
| Ah, apologetics any philosopher would be proud of. Only thing I
haven't heard explained though is how a team that finished in the top 5
in the USA last year and didn't lose anybody but did add one of the
finest frosh in the land cain suddenly have so many horrible weaknesses
that would put a 'W' over a CYO team appear uncertain.
Could you explain this for me, MrT?
- ACC Chris
|
15.549 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Dec 09 1991 12:03 | 8 |
| Chris,
How can you ask any questions of anyone, when you so cowardly take
the back door(by giving excuses, refusing to answer, etc) when any
objective question is put forth for you to answer.
Simply Amazing....
|
15.550 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Dec 09 1991 12:17 | 41 |
| Wildcat,
I don't know why IU is not shooting the three this year(as it's always
been a part of IU's offense). One thing that might be happening, is
that Bob likes to use the schedule prior to the Big10 season to work
the kinks out of the offense and defense. Anyway, failure to step out
the extra foot for the trey probably cost them the game. I wouldn't
want Anderson consistently trying threes but Cheaney should be shooting
them.
Kentucky had a great defensive scheme on Reynolds and Meeks(by backing
off them). Knight should have had them shooting those shots in the
2nd half just to see if they could make them and force Kentucky to
guard them.
Thoughts from the game:
o Two good comebacks by IU, showed they do have the ability to stop
the other team defensively when needed.
o IU's interior defense is terrible, Mashburn was able to establish
position with ease. I don't see an answer here unless Lindeman can
play. I think IU will play more zone this year than ever....
o Outside shooting is a problem, hopefully Pat Graham can come back
from his foot injury.
o Good move by the coaches to keep the freshman out of this game. From
a defensive standpoint, it was a fascinating game to watch(as IU and
Kentucky play the best man-to-man help defenses in the country).
o I was happy with Greg Graham's aggressiveness in taking the ball to
the hoop, but he should not be putting up shots outside of 15 feet.
o Damon Bailey looks like he lost some quickness(he wasn't that fast
to begin with), does anyone know if he's still having problems with
his feet.
o Pitino coached a very strong game, Knight coached well but should
have had Reynolds and Meeks shooting more.
|
15.551 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Dec 09 1991 12:37 | 70 |
| Rope, it depends on the flow leading up to the shot. In Kaintuck's
case they were running and then quick-reversing the ball to the weak
side for the trey. This leaves the Kaintuck with sufficient time to
step back if necessary. It's harder if you're a_inside main who's
coming across the lane through traffic with a nearby defender,
sometimes more than one.
>Could you exlain this for me, MrT?
Sure!
First, anybody who believes that IU was among the five best teams going
into last year's tourney is crazy. They had the same holes then and it
showed against Coastal Carolina, the FSU rioters, and Kansas.
Second, Alan Henderson is in his fourth game. He needs to be developed.
He's not at full power yet in terms of net benefit to the team. Ergo,
your question is rather stupid. You should defer until the tourney
(assuming Indiana makes the tourney, and I think they will) until calling
Bob's account due on the added dimension Henderson gives, which is the
inside defensive and rebounding presence and shooting they so clealry
lacked last year.
Third, Pat Graham is down with a broken foot. He's the only guard on
the team with the potential to develop into a fine outside shooter.
He's not too phsycial and is very slow of foot but he has a fine stroke.
Pat also served as a third forward last year even though he's really
a guard, and gave them a_offensive option when they collapsed over onto
Cheaney and/or Eric. I.e., Pat Graham is not playing yet this year,
and may indeed sit out the entire year.
Fourth, as Billy Packer repeatedly stated, Bob will make marginal
sacrifices in preconference games to benefit preparation for the Big10
schedule. He did this Saturday by not playing Henderson for more
minutes. He's going to phase him in. Beyond that, Bob's teams have
historically shown steady improvement as the season progresses. So,
again, your comparison of an end-of-season Bob squad with a beginning-
of-season Bob squad is a useless mistake.
I cain see why you'd tend to make such a useless mistake, though, given
that Snuffer's squads typically play at about the same level over an
entire season.
>apologetics any philospher would be proud of.
Kaintuck won fair and square. Pitino saw and exploited what Billy
Packer pointed out were IU's two "obvious weakenesses." These weaknesses
in talent turned out to be exactly the same as those pointed out by me.
IU is on track with my preseason prediction, having dropped in the rankings.
So it's not apologetics but instead objective analysis of acknowledged
facts. Starting a 6-2 forward is not something Bob would do if he could
avoid it, but he and everybody else in the Western Hemisphere realizes
how severely limited Matt Nover is.
IU will rack up a few cupcake victories with their annual munch-o'-thon
Indiana Classic. This tuning time will improve the team. Then, they'll
go into the Big10 and continue sustaining losses to the widebody teams
like OSU, Iowa, State, Michigan, and Minnesota and sink into the low
teens in the rankings, or maybe even into the 20s.
But they'll improve. Especially if they cain get PGraham back and/or
roll out Todd Lindemann as a serviceable center.
If they get on a roll they have a decent shot at making the Sweet Sixteen
before sustaining a most Excellent Loss - and MrT looks forward to that
and the pride it will bring me.
MrT
|
15.552 | First the SEC then the BE ....... | CST17::FARLEY | McDroodburgers - toss em up or down! | Mon Dec 09 1991 13:13 | 22 |
|
Attention all you IU Hooser fan(s):
Right now, take out your pencils and mark down "another excellent
loss" nexted to Bobby's name. Date it 12/21. Know why?????
still curious?
'cause LOUIEEEEE!!!!! and the SJU Redmen are gonna make sure ta exploit
ALL the deficiencies IU has!!!!!!!
so there!
Kev
|
15.553 | UofM | OLDTMR::RACZKA | Cant cheat with notes, gotta sing em | Tue Dec 10 1991 09:54 | 5 |
|
Hey...Those Wolverines are now 3-0 on the year
after last nights 112-62 win over Chicago St
chris UCLA '82
|
15.554 | Deja vu all over again | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Dec 10 1991 22:23 | 29 |
| The IU-Kentucky game looked a lot like last year's. No outside
shooting, no ability to post up, and no chance at playing interior
defense without massive help from the guards. Kentucky finally
hit their 3s (some of them amazing), which you knew they'd do
sooner or later, and Indiana didn't counter with much of anything.
They looked much better against Vandy tonight, of course; harder
play on both ends of the floor, and they kept it up for most of
the game. But Vandy's no Kentucky --- no one like Mashburn on the
inside to dominate, and a much less effective outside game. This
gave the Indiana guards time to recover without getting burned after
going inside to help out. At some point they need to go out and
beat a top quality team. It's been a long time since we've seen
them do that.
I was surprised Cheaney and Anderson didn't play more the second
half, although that may have had something to do with the score.
Wasn't too surprised that they (along with Bailey) were out the
entire first half, though. When Knight makes this big a change
it normally lasts more than a few minutes.
Holiday tournament this weekend for the Hoosiers. Should be two
easy W's, and maybe the start of the kind of improvement they'll
need if they want to be competitive with the really good teams
in the country (or the conference, for that matter).
They've got a long way to go.
tom
|
15.555 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 11 1991 09:24 | 47 |
| The Vandy team was a good sounding board for a team like IU, a
team looking for people to step up and fill holes, a team looking
to improve enough to ove up to the next level. This is cuz Vandy,
under Smif' acolyte Eddy Fogler, has done some recruiting that gained
national recognition the last year. LeRoy Woods, Milholland, and
Milburn are all big guys (LeRoy wears 1/2 size shoe) with good
bodies and some talent. True, they're almost all frosh and like IU
have no outside shooters to speak of, but they're a decent barometer
for a team looking for a front-line:
* Alan Henderson is Indiana's most talented player.He blocked shots
and hit the O-boards and generally outplayed the Vandy's big, highly
recruited freshmen.
* Todd Lindeman did OK too. Again, as with Henderson, these weren't
UCLA's widebodies they were playing, but he shot over some people
and grabbed the D-boards he should've, which oftentimes Nover is
unable to do.
* They played with the best defensive intensity I've seen in at least
two years. True, again, it was against aoung and raw squa but
that kindplay will make up for their talent gaps in most games
during the Big10.
* On the negative side, Indiana attempted 13 treys, most in the first
quarter of the game... and missed most of them.
As the announcers repeated said, Bob is obviously looking hard for some
inside players on D and the bs, and some outside shooting. He's
found half his inside game in Alan, and may be forced to move Anderson
into the middle (where he played when he was oncourt last night) or
maybe even Calbert to
GGraham is their most consistent player. He started at F last night,
which at a long-armed 6-4 makes more sense than Damon cuz he's quicker
and a quicker jumper for boards and on D.
This team will get better. I'd rank them at about 20th in the nation
right now. If Lindeman emerges and Alan continues to develop and
somebody finds 3-point range, they might even be dangerous.
But at this juncture I'm wondering if I shoulda predicted Indiana
finsihing behind Michigan for 4th in the conference. Michigan looks
very skeery right now. Rebounds. Ooodles a boards.And they're on
the tube Thursday night.
Big10 Tom
|
15.556 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 11 1991 13:46 | 45 |
| Anybody notice the sign being held up by a student in a couple of
the crowd shots last night?
"Dear Santa, Please Send a Big Man!"
Haa. Apparently just another sandbagger.
It'll be interesting to see what this Lindeman kid cain do against
the big men in the Big10: Webber, Peplowski, Martin, Moses, et al.
If he cain hold his own on the D, the D-boards, draw a few fouls and
chuck in a FG or two that would make a world of difference as far as
the Hoosiers' chances go.
It's tough to sort out where the roles and PT thing is going based on
last night, what with the big shakeup (Calbert, Eric, and the alleged
superstar talent Damon didn't start or play in the 1st half last night)
and the blowout against Vandy and the resultant garbage time.
But it could be that 6-3 G Todd Leary will get a shot given his outside
shooting ability. He's beefed up some, but in order to stay on the
floor he's gonna have to play some D, something he's been unable to do
against top drawer competition to date. The more time Leary gets the
less likely it is that PGraham is gonna come back this year. His foot
is still in a cast.
The Hoosier (Cupcake-Munch-o'-Thon) Classic is this weekend and usually
gives a good view as to who's gonna be first off the bench during the
Big10 season. It sez here that Leary will get PT and a shot.
I noticed in the 2nd half that Eric was playing C with Calbert and Alan
on the wings. Probably their best front-line talent. If Bob stays
with Nover and then Lindeman in the post something's got to give what
with Henderson's fine play. Somebody'll have to play backup F, possibly
Anderson. No way cain either Anderson or Cheaney stay with Henderson
when it comes to block and/or changed shots and O-rebounds - something
the undersized Hoosiers sorely need.
Also a potential sub this year is Damon. Meeks/Reynolds/GGraham are
much quicker and play better D than the slow-footed Bailey. Also,
Meeks and Reynolds seem a little better and dishing. So, to stay in
a starter's role Damon's gonna need to light it up from outside,
something he's only been able to do sporadically to date (like the
national TV game against Ohio State last year).
MrT
|
15.557 | VCR camping -- IU review | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Dec 11 1991 17:50 | 12 |
| I am impressed with Henderson. He is one of those Freshmen that you
have to let play though. He has the killer instinct on both ends. I
wouldn't say he is the most talented IU player but He's got the best
instincts for what Bob likes, hard play, in your jock D, and boards,
boards, boards. Lindeman looks a little like a guy by the name of Ted
Kitchel who used to play at IU 8-10 years ago. He looked about the
same as a freshman(early). He had a decent future until a knee injury
I believe.
I bowl on thursday night but I have the vcr camped out for the UM game.
Roy L.
|
15.558 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Dec 11 1991 22:07 | 32 |
| The Wolverines' game against E. Michigan will be sorta like the
IU game against Vandy: A test against representative but inferior
talent. Dunno much about EMU except that they usually have about
3 hot players and a bunch of stiffs. With Vandy we saw a team that
was extremely young but had some blue chip talent and will threaten
for the SEC, maybe, in 2-3 years.
Lindeman's unlike Kitchel in that Kitch was your 6-8 banger widebody
forward type. Kitch got very ugly about giving up boards. I see
Lindeman as more the gangly slowcenter type, but one with
hope if he cain get his feet to talk to his haid on a fast enough
response frequency. tually, I believe it was a debilitating lower
back injury that kiboshed Kitch's NBA career prcts, n his knee.
The announcers were pretty smart durinthe Vandy-IU game, pointing
out that Eric really needs to play facinghe basket, i.e., he needs
to play fwd and not C. But if Lindeman's not capable, who is? Looks
like Eric oNover to me, and if it's Nover IU's going nowhere in the
Big10 or the tourney.
Cain't wait to see Webber. He's quite the quipmeister in the press.
Wanna see Jalen too. These guys could be a frosh wrecking crew. But
they haven't played anybody yet. EMU will be a tougher challenge.
Will find out just how far offhey are on Saturday against Duke.
But, as Chris said, "Duke is the so-called #1 team in the country so
we'll have to improve. But sometimes teams play down to the level of
their competition, so we'll see."
Haa. Gottaove it!
Big10 Tom
|
15.559 | Did Marcus Kennedy (E Michigan) make the pros? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Dec 12 1991 09:26 | 19 |
| re: .-1
Somebody get the MrT decoder ring out - he's usin' his Hayes
DumbModem again ...
E Michigan made the Sweet 16 last year before getting beaten soundly by
North Carolina. That's the good news. The bad news is my S&S sez they
lost their top 7 players! In other words, look for Michigan to win
*big*.
Michigan - Duke could be close, but I doubt it. Make no mistake,
The Devils are no UNLV. They can be beaten without a minor miracle
taking place. But with so many youngsters playing against such a
seasoned team such as Duke, wail, I can't see this one being a game.
Should be interesting to watch though, just to see UM's awesome talent
arsenal.
- ACC Chris
|
15.560 | | OLDTMR::RACZKA | Cant cheat with notes, gotta sing em | Thu Dec 12 1991 09:38 | 10 |
| RE: -1
DUKE at MICHIGAN
This has all the makings to be a really great game
But I think Webber, Howard and Rose will be too much
and that the wolverines will win
chris UCLA alumni, who is waiting for the DUKE at UCLA game!!
|
15.561 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | RedSox,Broncos,MoiraLasch,Dean | Mon Dec 16 1991 10:35 | 20 |
| Well, it seems my speculation on the Hoosiers starting lineup was
on the right track: Against Cent. Mich. U. Henderson took Anderson's
fwd spot, and Reynolds moved out the badly overrated Damon. This
left Nover in the middle.
Michigan clearly has a shot at the Big10 Title this year. I don't
think they'll win it over OSU, but this is the best group a freshman
I've seen since Wooden's heyday. Chris Webber played Laettner to a
standstill (and he's in his, what, 5th game as a collegian?), but the
one who impresses me is this Rose.
You know there's trouble when Billy Packer starts yelling every time
a 6-2 junior guard touches the ball about how it must go to Jalen to
protect it cuz he's so much better the ball handler... and Rose is 6-8.
I don't think the Fab Five have had anybody come close to them on the
boards yet, with Duke coming the closest thus far having only been out
boarded by several. The block shot situation had to be about the same.
Big10 Tom
|
15.562 | Wow! | SHALOT::HUNT | Musicians For Free-Range Chickens | Mon Dec 16 1991 11:18 | 6 |
| Michigan's Fab Five look downright scary. That's a very tough Duke team
they took down to the wire.
I'll be very surprised if Chris Webber stays all four years in Ann Arbor.
Bob Hunt
|
15.563 | anybody notice that Juwan looks like he's 28? | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | RedSox,Broncos,MoiraLasch,Dean | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:24 | 1 |
|
|
15.564 | | REFINE::ASHE | Whaddya want for nothin'? | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:34 | 2 |
| Which one was Jimmy (ex-Piston, not JJ) Walker's son?
|
15.565 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: SPORTS' Objective Analyst | Mon Dec 16 1991 12:52 | 27 |
| Anybody heard what the story is with Lawrence Funderburke? The media
seemed pretty clear that he was fully eligible this year and I ain't
seed his name in any a the Buckeyes' box scores.
re 1
Here are the Fab Five:
Chris Webber C 6-10 (and growing) and I'd say about 240 lbs, quick,
smart, aggresive and highly skeeled
Juwan Howard F 6-10 and about 230, very strong, fairly quick, seems
like he'll be the most mistake prone and might have
a_attitude problem (he's always contorting his face
about some call or other)
Jalen Rose G Just your nice basic run a the mill 6-8 ballhandling
PG who penetrates and bounds and plays D with verve,
seems very polished
Jimmy King G I'd guess about 6-4, an amazing jumping jack very quick
off his feet and dangerous with the trey
? I thought the fifth Fab Five member - who I ain't seen
play - was a guard whose surname was Jackson. Dunno.
MrT
|
15.566 | Execellent Game to watch | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:38 | 23 |
|
re -.1 Last of the Fab 5 is Ray Jackson out of Texas as is King. He is
also a leaper with good ball handling skills. Against Eastern he
looked to have the best penetration skills of the group but he got very
few minutes against Duke. Talking to one of my buddies back home he
said the UM coach referenced a few questionable calls down the
stretch. Of course all of the calls went Dukes way. He seemed to
think a little bit of the NBA thing happened where rookies don't get
any calls. He then stated overall the refs. did a good job. After
looking at the game again this morning I sort of agree. Billy Packer
makes several references to phantom fouls or bad calls. At this point
in the season I don't think calls are a big issue because UM is really
still gauging its talent and team play. I think the team proved it's
ready for the big time errors and all.
The "D" was much better than anticipated but Duke doesn't have any
bangers. Cherokee Parks withstanding because I haven't seen him play.
As for the being the top ranked recruiting class it may or may not be
true but they have a clear advantage in that the have been getting
immediate playing time. Unlike Dean's and Bobby's kids.
Roy L.
"Goooooooooooo Blue"
|
15.567 | Webber Power Forward | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:41 | 4 |
|
re. -2
Webber is playing forward, Howard and Riley are playing center.
|
15.568 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: SPORTS' Objective Analyst | Mon Dec 16 1991 13:48 | 26 |
| >they have been getting immediate playing time. Unlike Dean's and
>Bobby's kids.
Now wait a minute. Calbert started from game one. So did Damon.
So did Eric. Also, the situation with Michigan this year is one that
the team was wide open for new players, which no doubt greatly helped
Fisher in recruiting such a class. Eric Riley is a physically talented
(very big, fairly quick, fine blocker, not real skeeled otherwise)
player. Voskuil is a good role player type. Ditto for the guard (name
escapes me right now).
Bob has always believed in playing the best players regardless of age,
race, or raw talent. To wit: Benching the much-hyped Damon in favor of
Chris Reynolds. Bob has a long history of starting freshmen who cain
do the job. Alan Henderson's this year's example. Lindeman will be
soon if he measures up. I don't buy your point.
Also, many Big10 people are counting on Steve Fisher's wretched and
undisciplined coaching to come through when the clutch goes down come
Big10 time. The Wolves have the talent to take the Title from Ohio
State for sure, and regardless of experience. If you're blocking and
intimidating shots and dominating the board the coach is in the
position to work on shot selection, matchups, and defenseive strategy
to take a young team like this to a Big10 Title.
Big10 Tom
|
15.569 | ...qualified statement | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 16 1991 15:25 | 17 |
|
RE: -1
I should have qualified the statement:
>they have been getting immediate playing time. Unlike Dean's and
>Bobby's kids.
I tend to agree with your reasoning as it refers to Bob Knignt that he
will play as his talent level dictates but seldom are there enough open
spaces in his lineup for a full class of Frosh to play. Dean has AA
after AA(all america) on his squads so again even great Frosh get
limited minutes., Reynolds would indeed be redshirted if not for
injuries if I recall correctly. Talley is the junior starting guard
decent O and ball handling.
Roy L.
|
15.570 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: SPORTS' Objective Analyst | Mon Dec 16 1991 16:04 | 15 |
| Talley, that's it. I thought he was the Wolves' best player last
year. But you know what I mean: The Wolves' roster was wide open
this year.
It's unclear why Reynolds was brought back. It's unlikely that he
was brought back to replace PGraham (their only good shooting guard)
cuz Reynolds is the worst shooter on the team (besides the awful Matt
Nover the tiny center who is strongly discouraged from touching the
ball under any circumstance besides rebounding). It's more likely
that he was brought back to give some D where Damon Bailey couldn't.
And believe me, if Bob were able to recruit one a the good centers he
went after he'd be starting frosh right now.
MrT
|
15.571 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Dec 23 1991 08:15 | 13 |
| Two recent quotes....
Calbert Cheaney: "I deserved to sit and should have been benched. I
was playing terribly. I need to find a way to stay focused all the
time. Coach Knight helped me regain my focus."
Dick Vitale: "Bobby, doesn't it hurt your recruiting when you bench
your star players?"
Knight: "Well I go by one simple rule, you play hard in practice, you
play in games, you don't than you sit. I would think that recruits
would want to come into a program where everyone is treated fairly
and have the same chance to play."
|
15.572 | Bingo! BINGO !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Live human male exotic dancer | Mon Dec 23 1991 10:45 | 1 |
|
|
15.573 | Knight--c'mon talent doesn't matter at all | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Dec 23 1991 13:17 | 12 |
| RE -2
That direct comment doesn't reference talent but a player with light
weight skills could practice his "donkey" off and would still probably
get very little playing time. I am making reference to the five guys
on the end of the pine that tend to be practice quad only.
Does College basketball offer 12 or 15 scholarships for hoops?? Also,
when a player has a career ending injury does he still receive his
scholarship and that count against the ncaa limit.
Roy L.
|
15.574 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Hippos-HippiesWithLowerVoices | Mon Dec 23 1991 14:25 | 4 |
|
Didn't the highest reanked big ten team get beaten by an unranked
pac-10 team recently in college hoops. Wasn't their initials OHIO
STATE?
|
15.575 | | CTHQ1::LEARY | busted flat in baton rouge | Mon Dec 23 1991 15:10 | 7 |
| Yep,
USC pulled the upset and is now in the Top 25 for the first time under
Raveling. Is USC projected in the top 3 in BBall for the Pac 10 this
year?
MikeL
|
15.576 | final preconference Big10 pix anyone? | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:41 | 1 |
|
|
15.577 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Mon Jan 06 1992 16:48 | 14 |
| I'll take a stab at the first few.
1. Indiana - Very impressive win over a talented UC squad Saturday.
Henderson's developing nicely.
2. Ohio State - I'm not sure they have the "TOUGHNESS" to take the
title. They'll give IU a run for their money though.
3. Michigan - Maybe sheer talent will pull them into the upper echelons
of the Big 10.
4. Michigan State - Playing very well. Could surprise the favorites.
WILDCAT
|
15.578 | | REFINE::ASHE | What's this about Creme de Menthe? | Mon Jan 06 1992 18:25 | 10 |
| Michigan
Indiana
MSU
OSU
Illinois
Iowa
who cares...
|
15.579 | Cast in Stone | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 07 1992 09:22 | 13 |
| 1. Indiana
2. OSU
3. MSU
4. Michigan
5. Iowa
6. Minnesota
7. Illinois
8. Purdue
9. Wisconsin
10.Northwestern
- ACC Chris
|
15.580 | Sportswriter's Big10 Pix | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 07 1992 11:58 | 25 |
| Here are the pix from Dennis Brackin, Mpls. Star-Tribune college
hoops beat writer:
1. Ohio State Jim Jackson is the Big10's best; can Lawrence
Funderburke find happiness?
2. Michigan St. The best chemistry and a great shooter in Shawn
Respert.
3. Indiana Bob Knight needs perimeter shooting and more muscle
inside.
4. Michigan The league's best talent, but they're only freshmen.
5. Iowa Everybody's back from last season's NCAA team.
6. Purdue No one gets more out of his talent than Gene Keady.
7. Minnesota Randy Carter's aching feet will tell the story.
8. Wisconsin Badgers finally have a point guard in Tracy Webster.
9. Illinois Fate sealed with Andy Kauffman's academic woes.
10. Northwestern Much improved, but still the Mildcats.
|
15.581 | Duke's Grant Hill Speaks Out on Big10 Pix !! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:04 | 15 |
| Funny, but Brackin's comments Indiana ring familiar. He's talking
like, who, Billy Packer?, MrT? Aw, he must be sandbagging.
Duke's Grant Hill's prediction:
"Michigan is more athletic and they bigger (than) either of the
UNLV teams we met in the past two NCAA Final Fours. Vegas had
five good players, Michigan goes seven or eight deep and they
seem to enjoy playing together... They should win the Big Ten
this year. I can't see anybody stoppeng them. They're the best
team we've faced the last two years."
Brrr !!
Poor MrT
|
15.582 | MrT Pix Big10 All-Frosh Squad | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:07 | 5 |
| F Alan Henderson Indiana
F Juwan Howard Michigan
C Chris Webber Michigan
G Jalen Rose Michigan
G Shawn Respert Michigan State
|
15.583 | Antoine goes global | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:21 | 5 |
| Didn't someone ask something about Antoine Joubert? In any case, he's
been signed by the Mid-Michigan Great Lakers of the Global Basketball
Association. He's still listed as a guard.
TTom
|
15.584 | MrT's Big10 Pix | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 07 1992 12:33 | 76 |
| 1. Ohio State JJ & TB team up with ThunderBurp to make trouble.
Their backup C Bill Robinson would be hailed as IU's
best middlemain since Ray Tolbert. This team is
deep, experienced, and well-coached. JJ's trey is
up to 54% from last year's 33%.
2. Michigan When you have a 6-8 PG who'll probably be the best
ballhandler in the conference and who digs driving
the lane, shooting treys, stealing balls, blocking
shots, and crashing the boards... and he's only
your 2nd best player - this is real bad trouble.
Webber is the best frosh in the land. Howard gives
them a nukewidebodystud presence up front. Talley,
last year's best player, is humping to maintain PT.
7-2 Eric Riley's much improved but now a sub. Most
talented team in the country in years.
We cain only pray that Fisher's influence will yield
poor shot selection, stupid fouls, and the like, but
don't count it: Chris Webber is running this team.
Could easily surprise the Buckeyes and take the Big10.
3. Indiana Hoosier's crisis in Springfield against the talented
was probably the best thing for this flawed team. In
an impressive win over talented (and physical) Cincy
on the road Bob put Henderson at C and Anderson on
the wing, very important cuz Eric is a fine J-shooter
and from the wing he'll get more and better shots and
this'll somewhat alleviate their obvious shooting
woes.
Hoosiers need someone to take over the team from the
PG slot. Passing has improved dramatically but they
need to put better pressure on the ball. Also need
PGraham back for some outside shooting cuz they'll
see zones in Big10. Maybe "superstar" Damon Bailey
can gain consistency with his J.
4. Michigan St. Respert is best outside shooter in league. Matt
Stegenga is best athlete in league. Peplowski is
strongest C in league. Great recruiting classes
coming to fruition now. Could easily surpass Indiana
if they play with any consistency.
5. Iowa Only thing holding this squad back is Dr. Malpractice's
knucklehaided insistence on clinging to that useless
PermaPress defense with a plodding but physical squad.
Acie Earl may be slowfooted, but he's tough on the
blocks.
6. Illinois My surprise pick. Clemons is a fine guard and Deon
is maturing. They have a passel of role players and
are playing that tough Illini D.
7. Purdue 6-10 240 Glenn Robinson is, IMNSHO, better than Chris
Webber in the middle - but he's Prop48. Woody Austin
and gang will execute Gene's Bob-like passing game
and hang tough in most games.
8. Minnesota Great frosh guard in Voshon Lenard, but their best
player the past two years was PF Randy Carter who
shot for high % and banged the boards, and he's going
down with bone spurs in his feet. 7-1 center Bob
Martin is maturing, finally, as a senior. Young but
talented squad. Could surpass Purdue and Illini if
Carter stays on and young frosh hold up.
9. Wisconsin Tracy Webster is a dynamite PG, but they're backfilling
for departed Willy Simms and Patrick Tompkins up front.
Their big people are untested, but big.
10. Northwestern Could well blow by Wisconsin and move up as high as
8th.
MrT
|
15.585 | Pat Grahm Update | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRAVO PITINO! | Tue Jan 07 1992 13:06 | 22 |
| MrT, got some news last night on Pat Grahm. The Louisville Courier
Journal reported in Sunday's edition that Knight has decided to
red-shirt Grahm this season. Grahm apparently just started practicing
with the team a week or so ago. Knight decided over the weekend to
save him for next year.
Also, on my Big-Ten picks, I forgot that OSU was getting Funderberk for
the Big Ten season. With that in mind, I'll have to switch my top two.
1. Ohio State
2. Indiana
3. Michigan
4. Michigan State
.
.
.
Although Michigan is quite talented, I can't see such a young squad
surviving the rigors of the Big-Ten and beating the likes of Ohio State
and Indiana out for the title.
WILDCAT
|
15.586 | | REFINE::ASHE | What's this about Creme de Menthe? | Tue Jan 07 1992 15:21 | 2 |
| How big is Joubert now? About 250 pounds?
|
15.587 | In under the wire | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Jan 07 1992 19:29 | 41 |
| Predictions:
1. Ohio State - Good defense at guard, better at forward (when
JJ's there). Offensively, a good outside team
with the quickness to get to the basket from
4 positions, and the strength to get there from
2. But the Wandering One makes the difference.
2. Indiana - Great defense, but without the shooting abilities of
Ohio State. Matchup problems on the front line with
(at least) Ohio State and Michigan. However, a lot
of experience and a lot of talent give them a shot if
Funderburke *doesn't* make the difference.
3. Michigan - Great front line, but should see a lot of foul trouble
on the road. Will they have enough balls to keep
everybody happy? They'll overwhelm a lot of people,
but the experience isn't there (and the coaching might
not be either).
4. Michigan State - Lower expectations than last year, but Jud's
having a lot more fun. Probably not enough
talent to compete for the top.
5. Iowa - Another mediocre year for another mediocre coach. Can't
wait to see the Hoosiers play against that press in
Bloomington.
6. Purdue - Keady gets the most out of a team with serious weaknesses.
7. Illinois - They'll play great defense, but after Deon Thomas who
is there.
8. Minnesota - Just a down year.
9. Northwestern - Not as bad as they've been recently.
10. Wisconsin - Wisconsin.
tom
|
15.588 | Stay awake for the whole thing... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Is it a question of Love? hahaaaaa | Wed Jan 08 1992 09:27 | 11 |
|
I'm glad that ESPN listen to Bobby and gave the Big Ten their own night
with a leadoff spot. Last night's game was a good opener. As Tom said
The Wandering One will be the difference in a good OSU squad and a great
one.
Poplowski play a nice strong game for MSU.
Wonder if JJ has a chance to take the CPOY away from the "Shack"...
mike
|
15.589 | | OLDTMR::RACZKA | Cant cheat with notes, gotta sing em | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:12 | 7 |
|
Ohio State 62 (over-rated) MSU 46
Jim Jackson led OSU with 17
Peplowski led MSU with 13
|
15.590 | | FRETZ::HEISER | reach out and taunt someone | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:39 | 63 |
| Article: 4343
From: [email protected] (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Big Ten Update (1-8-92)
Date: 8 Jan 92 16:25:34 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Immediate Results and Upcoming Big Ten games (home teams in CAPS):
Jan. 7: OHIO STATE 62, Michigan State 46: A very closely contested
1st half (29-26 OSU) turned into a rather convincing first
loss for MSU. The Buckeyes seemed to get a boost out of
the debut of Lawrence Funderburke, and he played pretty
well, but has some cobwebs. Amazing that this guy has only
played in 6 "organized" games since the end of the 1987-88
season (his junior year in high school). Jim Jackson remains
the man, and came through when needed. I thought this game
might be higher scoring than it was. Jackson led OSU with
17 points and 9 boards, while Larry had 7 points, 3 boards,
and 3 blocks. OSU once led by 19 at 56-37. I urge everyone
to tune in on Thursday for the Michigan-Iowa matchup - could
be the "funnest" Big Ten game in years... 13,276, as always,
in Columbus...
Penn State at James Madison: Was this played or is my
schedule wrong? I saw no mention of it in USA Today this
morning...
Jan. 8: Purdue at Illinois (7 pm CST, I'll be there, of course,
perhaps with bag over head)
Northwestern at Wisconsin
Jan. 9: Minnesota at Indiana
Michigan at Iowa (ESPN, 7:30 pm CST)
Jan. 11: Illinois at Michigan State (CBS, 3 pm CST)
Indiana at Wisconsin
Iowa at Purdue (7 pm CST)
Michigan at Minnesota (Raycom/Big Ten Network, 12 pm CST)
Ohio State at Northwestern
Morgan State at Penn State
RECORDS:
Sagarin Team All Conf
------- ---- --- ----
6 Ohio State 9-1 1-0
16 Michigan State 10-1 0-1
13 Michigan 8-1
1 Indiana 9-2
15 Iowa 8-2
99 Penn State 8-3
107 Northwestern 7-3
84 Wisconsin 9-4
65 Purdue 8-4
29 Minnesota 8-5
100 Illinois 6-4
--
-------------------------------
| Randy Peppler |
| Illinois State Water Survey |
| [email protected] |
|
15.591 | Young team - all freshman and sophs except 2 | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Wed Jan 08 1992 18:31 | 8 |
| No real Big 10 predictions here, but I'll say my Gophs will go 8-10 in
conference play. I will predict this though, the Gophs will win one of
their first two games. They have always played IU tough in Bloomington
under Clem and play anybody tough at home. Michigan over the Gophs is
not a gimmie by any means.
Spud
|
15.592 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Jan 10 1992 11:37 | 31 |
| I like the starting lineup Bob seems to've settled on:
PF - 6-9 Eric Anderson
SF - 6-6 Calbert Cheaney
C - 6-9 Alan Henderson
OG - 6-2 Damon Bailey
PG - 6-1 Chris Reynolds
Eric, as I predicted long ago, has taken off with his outside shooting
now that he's not being planted into the blocks by a much stronger C
and tiring and ending up in foul trouble.
Henderson is long-armed and high-jumping and much better in the paint
that Eric could ever be. He still looked scary shooting from the
outside last night though, casually popping 15-20 footers.
The bigger frontline relieves Calbert of pressure on his weak points
(inside D, rebounding) and frees him up to do more creation with the
pill.
Damon is finally showing signs that he cain be consistent from the
outside. Chris or GGraham will never be great shooters, but both
have the the ability to penetrate the zone and dish or drive. These
three along with Jamaal Meeks are showing relentless pressure D.
The team is thin up front, but experienced and blessed with good
quickness. They've seem to've pretty much mastered Bob's system with
few breakdowns. They could be dangerous and maybe even threaten the
Buckeyes and the Michigans for the Big10 Title.
MrT
|
15.593 | Good enough to overcome adversity? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Jan 14 1992 18:51 | 13 |
| Well, after much discussion with the Mildcat over the last couple
of days, I'd planned to predict a 7-point Hoosier victory tonight (something
like 82-75). HOWEVER...
Columbus, OH television just reported that Alan Henderson, Eric
Anderson, and Damon Bailey all have strep. Henderson was reported as being
out for the night, with Anderson and Bailey likely playing. Given this,
I suspect the Buckeyes might be able to beat the Hoosiers up (again) on the
front line. So...
Ohio State 75, Indiana 68
tom
|
15.594 | What a pleasant surprise | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Jan 14 1992 21:41 | 22 |
|
Ok, so what do I know anyway.
Ohio State showed little board strength and less shooting, especially
in the first half. Mostly, however, they showed a complete lack of emotion
and composure. Ayers has to be really disappointed with the number of bad
shots that were put up in the first half, no matter how good IU's defense was.
The Hoosiers, on the other hand, once again got a monstrous effort out
of Greg Graham. Over the last six or eight games he's easily been their best
player, and along with Anderson has given them the outside game they need to
be competitive. I didn't think Bailey showed any ill effects of flu/strep,
but Anderson clearly seemed to tire late.
A very good effort by a team that's been playing very, very well.
tom
I agree with Dicky V, by the way. A time-out was clearly in order.
I would have been shocked if one had been called much sooner than it was,
however.
|
15.595 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | THE MONSTER MASH | Tue Jan 14 1992 22:39 | 20 |
| Tom, great game by IU. IMO, Ohio State looked pathetic on offense.
Mark Baker and co. were throwing up garbage at crucial points of the
game. They seemed to have no patience offensively.
To beat IU, especially at home, you need offensive patience. A team
must be prepared for a physical, hard fought contest. Nothing comes
easy in Bloomington. OSU was playing way too much one-on-one
basketball.
IU played extremely well considering the loss of Henderson, Anderson
ailing, etc. Remember folks, this is the same team that many thought
was the best team in the country heading into the NCAA's last season.
Don't let MrT fool you! GET A T.O. MrT! You're gonna have to do some
serious back peddling!
BTW, Knight almost let the game slip away when OSU went on their 21-2
run. Luckily, Calbert entered the game with 12 minutes to play saddled
with four fouls and played flawlessly the remainder of the contest.
WILDCAT
|
15.596 | Main, dem Hoosiers gots some talent! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknight | Wed Jan 15 1992 07:31 | 1 |
|
|
15.597 | Knight ought have somebody cheapshot Bailey early every game ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | This note sure gone crazy | Wed Jan 15 1992 07:42 | 10 |
|
and if Meeks can learn to hit that bomb consistently and take it a little
more often this team becomes downright scary. If Pat Graham hadn't got hurt
Chris Reynolds would have been redshirted. I like Graham but it's hard to
imagine him bring more to the floor than Chris. Yet Knight would have went
with a weaker team in order to help the kid develop into an even better
player. What a guy....
mike
|
15.598 | Still no T ? Talk about runnin' skeert ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Harem guards, geldings, MrT | Wed Jan 15 1992 09:50 | 1 |
|
|
15.599 | Could be real tough come tourney time | SCNDRL::HUNT | Killer Ninja Nuns At The OK Corral | Wed Jan 15 1992 09:53 | 5 |
| Any thoughts of Indiana's demise are also exaggerated. They've got lots
of talent and the best coach in the game. They may not make a title run
this year but you can't help but think that Knight is gearing up for one.
Bob Hunt
|
15.600 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | THE MONSTER MASH | Wed Jan 15 1992 10:31 | 5 |
| They better gear up for a run real quick Bob. Their window of
opportunity is this year and next. After next season, they lose the
farm. Bob better have a quality recruiting crop next October.
WILDCAT
|
15.601 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway | Fri Jan 17 1992 10:50 | 31 |
| Yeah IU has lotsa talent but unfortunately that doesn't include
shooting guard or center. Other than that, they're loaded with
quickness, a refreshing thing looking back to the plodding days
of Alford & Co., who couldn't guard the quick guys at all.
IU's played 4 top teams and have gone 2-2. The major question to
take out a this game is how much a it was emotion (the Hoosier
players hated ThunderBurp's guts when he was in Bloomington, the
game had big Big10 Title implications) and how much a it was superb
execution of Bob's system, which when properly run cain imbue a squad
with "machine like" properties that enable them to play at a very high
level.
My guess is the latter. They should lose about 4 games in the Big10
and drop to 10-15 in the standings, but then they make their run. If
Henderson steps in nicely at C this team could be dangerous. They'll
still be susceptible to foul trouble for lack a front-line depth
against aircraft carrier squads like UCLA, but they'll be good. If
GGraham and Damon cain continue to shoot well.
Purty smart a Bob to take MrT's advice and compensate for poor outside
shooting guards by slashing them inside to pick up beaucoup FTs or to
dish.
re 1
This year's recruiting class didn't even make the ratings in Basketball
Weekly. It's all or nothing once the juniors (GGraham, Reynolds, Meeks,
Cheaney, et al) leave.
MrT
|
15.602 | IU fan lost in the East | ROULET::KATTAU | | Mon Jan 20 1992 08:27 | 6 |
|
Did IU win on Saturday? How did they look?
Kat
|
15.603 | 4 down, 14 to go | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Jan 20 1992 10:07 | 24 |
| Hoosiers won 96-62 at Northwestern on Saturday night. Calbert
Cheaney, who'd been averaging about 11 shots a game while spending most
of the season in foul trouble, took 12 shots in the first half and ended
up with 26(?) points for the game. He also stayed OUT of foul trouble for
the first time in recent memory. Bailey and Graham continued their good
play of recent games, and Alan Henderson was back from his bout with
strep/flu, although he wasn't full speed. He's expected to be 100% by
Tuesday night, when Michigan and the Fab Five come to Bloomington (7:30 EST,
ESPN).
Two interesting items about Michigan:
First, the best line I've yet heard about the "greatest recruiting
class ever". This from a sports talk show host in Fort Wayne: "The problem with
the Wolverines is that they don't play the game with enough basketballs.
Michigan needs four - three for Jalen Rose and one for everybody else."
Second, I read that the players are actually having discussions with
the news media on WHAT THEIR NICKNAME SHOULD BE. That's right, five college
freshmen who've never won anything are concerned about what the media call them.
Easy to see why they didn't end up at Indiana, NC or any of a dozen other
schools that wouldn't put up with that kind of attitude.
tom
|
15.604 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Jan 20 1992 10:42 | 21 |
| Hey Tom, picking up that good 100,000 watt WOWO all the way down
in Dayton?
Some impressions: Indiana has played its two tougher games (OSU
& Minny) at home, two cupcakes ont he road... Michigan has picked
up two Ws against toughies (Iowa and Illini) on the road and have
also played and lost to relative toughie Minny away from home...
Lawrence ThunderBurp is as talented as they say, but based on his
low-class behavior I'm glad he left Hoosierland... Purdue's W at
Crisler arena had one mind-blowing stat: they outrebounded the
Fab Five or 5 Xs or whatever in the hell they're called 40-20 !!...
I think Prop48 Glenn Robinson is better than Chris Webber, so who
knows how good Purdue will be next year... Indiana will lose two
players to graduation and both are front-liners on a team very weak
along the baseline, Anderson and Nover, which'll leave then-senior
Calbert, Lindemann, and red-shirt Evans, only 3 front-liners, which
is scary cuz the only recruit thus far this year is a 6-3 guard, so
next year's senior-laden class mighty weak up front in a conference
filling up with widebodies...
MrT
|
15.605 | Wandering One has an attitude, don't he? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Jan 20 1992 15:36 | 24 |
| Actually, hard as it is to believe, I think Nover's one of those "is
he EVER going to graduate" kind of guys. If I remember correctly, he was in
the same class as Anderson and Meeks, but a red-shirt year makes him a junior
in eligibility. Assuming he's back, combining him with Cheaney, Lindemann,
Henderson, and Evans should leave the Hoosiers in decent shape on the front
assuming Lindemann's good enough to play next year. He's not this year. Add
in a returning Pat Graham (and a returning Pat Knight) and things shouldn't
look bad at all. There'll be a lot of quickness and talent to replace the
year after that, but that's way too far ahead to worry about.
WOWO comes in clear as a bell most nights. A few hours from now
I'll be sitting down to listen to the BobKnight "call-in" show. For those
of you who can get it (WOWO, 1190 AM out of Fort Wayne, IN) I'd recommend
giving it a listen. For better or worse, it's definitely NOT your
run-of-the-mill coaches show.
Word out of Columbus is that the coaches have been working really
hard on Funderburke trying to get him to tone it down a bit. They think
he got a bad call and bad press on the foul against Bailey, but are worried
about the extra-curricular shoving that he participated in during the IU
game. Might be why he didn't get the start against Iowa over Bill "The Ultimate
Stiff" Robinson.
tom
|
15.606 | Golden Gophers | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Mon Jan 20 1992 17:37 | 10 |
| Gotta love my Gophs so far, 3-1 and second place to themselves.
They've already beaten two ranked teams in Michigan and MSU and won at
Wisconsin for the first time in Clem's tenure here. Tough game coming
up at OSU on Wednesday night. I'm hoping for a split this week as
Illinois comes in on Sat.
Minnesota's home magic seems to be back!
Spud
|
15.607 | WOWO - Sweet Memories :-) | DYPSS1::ROPER | THE MONSTER MASH | Mon Jan 20 1992 20:09 | 25 |
| Glad to hear there are some WOWO fans out there. Being from Fort
Wayne, I listened to WOWO regularly. I can remember many a night
staying up late to here the Fort Wayne Komets play their International
Hockey League foes.
Since the subject is radio talk shows, there are a couple of other good
ones to check out.
1. 700 WLW. This show comes from Cincinnati. All in all, I think WLW
has the best sports talk show that I've ever heard. Chris
Collingsworth (former wideout for the Bengals) is the host. Andy
Furman is another outrageous character on the show. The show runs from
6-9 every evening. WLW is a 50,000 watt station.
2. 84 WHAS. WHAS is also 50,000 watts. WHAS IMHO has the best college
basketball coverage in the Mid-West. No other station gives anywhere
near as good of roundball and football recruiting coverage as WHAS.
WHAS also covers all Louisville and Kentucky basketball games. I
picked up WHAS when I was in Maine last year, so I know thos up East
should be able to get it. Same goes for WLW.
Both WHAS, and WLW have toll-free numbers that you can call to voice
your opinion.
WILDCAT
|
15.608 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Jan 21 1992 08:40 | 2 |
| Both WLW and WHAS come in fine here in Atlanta. I have often listened
to Reds games on WLW in the past few years.
|
15.609 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 21 1992 12:35 | 18 |
| Well, the Hoosiers have the Fab Five or 5 Xs or whatever in Assembly
Hall tonight. Every tough game for the Hoosiers has been at home
thus far, while Michigan has impressed like hell for frosh taking
two road wins at Illinois and Iowa.
You cain bet that Bob'll look at the films a Purdue's startling
road win at Crisler, trying to figure how in the world the Boilers
took 40 rebounds from an all-nuke front-line.
Damon's played very well lately, taking the leadership role. Ditto
for GGraham, who may actually have learned how to jump shoot. Hope
they keep it up and that Calbert doesn't get into early foul trouble
against the nukes on the baseline. Should be brutal.
I'm most excited about seeing Alan going up against Chris. If he does
well against the #1 frosh then he's really something...
MrT
|
15.610 | A win's a win, but... | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Jan 21 1992 22:28 | 16 |
| Difficult 15-point win for the Hoosiers over the Wolverines
tonight. Michigan was hurt badly by their inexperience on the defensive
end, resulting in open jump shots for the Hoosiers and lots of fouls (tough
being a freshman on the road in the Big Ten). No real bright spots for
Indiana --- they looked tired and the concerns about whether they'll be able
to hold up against the powerful front lines around the country are back.
Cheaney didn't have a prayer with Juwann Howard, and Anderson didn't look
much better. Henderson, recovered or not, looked a lot like a kid compared
to both Howard AND Webber. If they find a point guard for next year and
everyone stays around (and stays happy), Michigan has a chance to be
seriously good next season.
Next up for Indiana: Purdue at home on January 28. The week off
should do them good.
tom
|
15.611 | I see Michigan, I see Orange. huh?
| CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Wed Jan 22 1992 07:02 | 12 |
|
Maybe Jalen will get it together Tom and Michigan will have their point.
Definately the worst I've seen Anderson play in a long time offensively
but as usual he did contribute in other ways. I thought Damon's more
aggressive offensive style and Reynolds and Graham defense were bright
spots. What Novar? 2 buckets in the first 5 minutes of the game? I almost
fainted. Too bad he revert back to form in the second half.
Fisher better wake up and take over his team otherwise I see them falling
short of their potential.
mike
|
15.612 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 22 1992 09:23 | 9 |
|
I still like Indiana's chances in this year's tourney. They're
talented, disciplined and they've got the master at the helm. If
anyone can give Duke a run for the title this spring, I think it's
Indiana, Ohio State, or UCLA (all longshots still, but everyone
else is off the board).
glenn
|
15.613 | Miller would have to stay out of foul trouble | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Wed Jan 22 1992 10:58 | 9 |
|
Glenn, I'd put Arkansas in the group as well especially if Nolad doesn't have
to do too much coaching. Another team that might have a shot at Duke is UCONN.
They're talented, experienced and have the revenge factor having been sent
home the last two years by Duke.
UNC? they'll be home long before they'd have a chance....
mike
|
15.614 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Jan 22 1992 14:35 | 5 |
| I was impressed with Oklahoma State the other night. This team is not
just Byron Houston (sp?), either. They have an excellent backcourt and
some good depth.
Joe
|
15.615 | | DECWET::METZGER | /Slasher welshes on a bet? | Wed Jan 22 1992 14:50 | 11 |
|
I was also. They showed great composure in not getting caught up in Oklahoma's
run and gun offense. Especially after the first 3-4 minutes when the shots were
flowing like junk notes.
As was even more impressed with UMass's win over Oklahoma as a result of this
game.
Which is a very nice thing :-)
Metz
|
15.616 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don Robichaud = /Daidbeat Don | Wed Jan 22 1992 16:47 | 40 |
| I agree that Oklahoma St., Arkansas, and UCONN also have a legit shot
at Duke. By season's end I think a powerful Zona squad will too.
What worries me about the Hoosiers is that they'll spend the last month
playing all the tough opponents on the road (they've played the Big10's
only two cupcakes, NW & Wisc., on the road and will have played OSU,
Michigan, Minny, and Purdue at home. So the stage is set for them to
prove themselves down the stretch on the road. They'll either hold up
to the road pressure or show cracks, I think they need to go 3-3 on the
road against OSU/State/Michigan/Purdue/Minny/Iowa to come into the
tourney poised to make a run at a Title.
As Tom said IU showed their deficiencies along the front-line last
night, having shots blocked/changed and giving up O-rebounds by the
lot. On the other hand had they shot well from the stripe they woulda
put the game away much earlier. If "coach" Steve Fisher had run in
the first half the O-set he ran in the second Michigan woulda won.
Bob clearly is looking for the perimeter shooting to establish itself.
They started out bombing, with Damon and Reynolds (of all people)
canning treys. Then it was boing boing boing, and they had to go back
to the weave n' pick offense to get those sweet foul shots.
It woulda been easy for Bob to cave in when Talley and Voskuil started
canning those treys that Indiana was daring them to shoot as they
collapsed on Howard and Webber. But he stuck with his plan and it
worked. With the Hoosiers' lack a inside muscle had they spread the
defense I think Michigan woulda ran wild along the baseline.
Damon Bailey has arrived. All the guards are showing great intensity.
True Calbert was helpless against Juwan but looking at how close he
was covering him I think only Shack coulda stopped him in that 2nd
half.
Look for Alan Henderson to blossom big-time in the 2nd half of the
conference season. This kid is a lot tougher mentally than I ever
expected him to be at this young age. Maybe it's natural for a son of
a heart surgeon to not be prone to nervousness...
MrT
|
15.617 | | FRETZ::HEISER | reach out and taunt someone | Wed Jan 22 1992 17:14 | 7 |
| > I agree that Oklahoma St., Arkansas, and UCONN also have a legit shot
> at Duke. By season's end I think a powerful Zona squad will too.
From what I've seen of UCLA, I'd add them to the list too. They were
impressive in their win in Tucson, especially Maclean!
AridZona always starts slow. Must be a Lute Olson team trademark.
|
15.618 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don Robichaud = /Daidbeat Don | Wed Jan 22 1992 17:47 | 5 |
| UCLA was in Waugamain's original Duke hit-list. Based on their
physical talent, depth, and newfound maturity, I consider the
UCLAns to be definitely #2, and maybe the best of all.
MrT
|
15.619 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don Robichaud = /Daidbeat Don | Wed Jan 22 1992 18:09 | 7 |
| I also consider Jim Jackson to be the best player in the nation
right now. The more I see him the more I realize that he doesn't
have a single flaw in his game. Great J shooter, cain post up,
cain dribble to the hoop from either side, great rebounder guard,
fine D-player, superb passer... he cain do it all.
MrT
|
15.620 | | FRETZ::HEISER | reach out and taunt someone | Wed Jan 22 1992 18:32 | 1 |
| does he MWWTB (Move Well Without The Ball) ala Jim Paxson? ;-)
|
15.621 | Gophs lose a close one | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Thu Jan 23 1992 09:34 | 24 |
| Gophs battled and lost a close one in Columbus last night. They were
up eight in the first half, but trailed by one at intermission. The
Gophers went cold to start the second half and eventually found
themselves down by 13 midway through the second half. Slowly but
surely, they made their way back and with about two minutes to go they
started nailing three pointers. After hitting about four in a row (in
between fouling to kill the clock) they cut it down to one point.
After two more OSU FT's the Gophs had two chances to tie in the final
30 seconds. The first shot was a good one to take and went off the
rim, but they got the rebound. With 16 seconds left, McDonald must've
panicked, because he lauched about a 25 footer. It was way off and
that was the game.
Playing without Randy Carter now, some of us thought the Gophs would
have a tough time the rest of the way, but instead they seem to be
getting better. They're playing the big boys even up and right now
I don't see any reason why they couldn't beat anyone (including
Indiana) at home this year.
For such a young team I thought they'd be a year or two off, but they
may be ready sooner.
Spud
|
15.622 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don Robichaud = /Daidbeat Don | Thu Jan 23 1992 12:30 | 22 |
| Is Ohio State as good as thought? They were lucky to win at home
against a Gopher squad minus its best player Randy Carter. Somehow
the Gophs manage to scratch and scrape and drag better teams down
into an ugly low percentage game that leaves them a shot at winning.
I think that horrific 45 point blowout in Bloomington hardened this
young team. Arriel McDonald looked like the world's worst outside
shooter last year and this year he's scary with the trey, as is
Townsend Orr.
Allegedly 7-0 C Bob Martin (looks more like 7-2 to me) started off
great blocking shots and boards and then, after a few bad exchanges,
did his usual disappearing act - hard to do when you're that big and
a redhaid to boot. If the insonsistent Martin had showed up for the
2nd half OSU woulda lost.
Lawrence ThunderBurp was all over the map last night, playing outta
control, making stupid mistakes, and giving up on D. Burp looks like
he's always trying to make the spectacular play at the expense of his
floorgame. One wonders how long the tough-minded Ayers will tolerate
this.
MrT
|
15.623 | Mornin' | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Fri Jan 24 1992 09:38 | 42 |
| MrT, you're wishy-washy.
First you say the Gophs are going to be better than expected this year,
then after some losses you say they're not going to do very well. Then
again the other day after the MSU win you say "I told you they were
going to be good." Make up your mind, will ya?!!!
Let's get a couple of things straight. McDonald has NOT had a good
season really, he has shot terrible overall. Witness his poor
judgement as well on the ill-advised shot to tie it from 25+ feet when
they had plenty of time to work for one much better. The Gophers best
player is NOT Randy Carter. Someday he could be, but with Voshon
Leonard, I doubt it. Right now the Gophers two best players are
Leonard and Kolander, both freshman. Orr has really come on the last
couple of games nailing four and five three's in each. He'll very
likely take PT away from McDonald.
As for the Gophers scratching and scraping, hey, it's the Big10 way
and if you're going to survive, you'd better learn how to deal with it.
How does IU do it "without the big man?"
The bad loss at Indiana was ugly, no question about it. Clem has
mentioned a couple of times that he intentionally let it get out of
hand once they were out of it - to teach the young team a lesson that
you have to be ready to play. (and remember, after trailing 44-18 at
the half, they closed it to 12!! This being one of your arguments a
couple of years ago when the Gophs blew out IU here by about 30. IU
had cut that lead to all of 18 and you were giving it the "moral
victory" speech)
Let's give the Gophs a little credit here. They've had one bad game
out of six. OSU is good, the Gophs executed and were prepared to play.
They almost pulled it out.
I think you are (again) skeered that IU is gonna have a tough time
here.
Now, the REAL question is whether you will keep your reply to 100 lines
or less...
Spud :*)
|
15.624 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don Robichaud = /Daidbeat Don | Fri Jan 24 1992 15:26 | 9 |
| Randy Carter is their best player. Voshon Lenard has disappeared the
last few games. Carter is the Gophers' best rebounder and inside
player on D and offense. He's the one the NBA scouts are panting over.
Voshon for now at least is high school press clippings. He looked for
real against Minnesota's annual cupcake nonconf schedule and has gone
into the tank since the Big10 started.
MrT
|
15.625 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jan 28 1992 12:58 | 4 |
| Anyone else notice that the Loosiers are on ESPN AGAIN tonight?
Seems like every time you look there's red belly again. Think he paid
off those made for TV types?
Denny
|
15.626 | cakewalk | CTHQ2::LEARY | Look what they've done to my song,Maw | Tue Jan 28 1992 13:29 | 3 |
| Will the 'Boilers upset the poor Hoosiers at their pit??
Nah.
|
15.627 | I'll be watching, but don't expect the upset ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Jan 28 1992 14:13 | 8 |
| No way can Purdue beat the Hoosiers, who are one very scary unit at the
moment. Credit Carolina for pasting the Boilermakers though. Purdue
has turned into a very solid club, which adds value (from an NCAA
Tourney Selection Committee perspective) on our solid 'W' at the Smith
Center.
- ACC Chris
|
15.628 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Don't mess with MrT !! [macho] | Tue Jan 28 1992 14:38 | 16 |
| I'm not so sure about that. The Boilers rolled into Crisler and
banged the Fab5 for a 40-20 rebounding edge. Don't know how they
managed it, given the huge size and athletic ability of Michigan,
but Gene Keady always manages very well with the hand he's dealt.
Purdue must have some muscle. Indiana is acknowledged as having
weakness inside. If the Boilers cain work their game plan and Woody
cain pump it up the Boilers could win going away.
IU is the type of team that must execute at a very high level or
they've got big problems, especially against a team with a rock 'em
sock 'em baseline.
Should be fun.
MrT
|
15.629 | IU will roool | CTHQ1::LEARY | Look what they've done to my song,Maw | Tue Jan 28 1992 16:37 | 11 |
| Should be fun for you, MrT.
No way cain the 'makers win going away. Not in that red'n'white lion's
den. Michigan can be very undisciplined as you saw and Purdue (on home
court under Keady's tutelage) had the master plan. No way cain he
defeat the Master at home. BK owns Keady at home jest like he
owned Phelps everywhere. Purdue'l make a run, but like OSU and UM,
will go down to the Red Scourge. And you know it well.
MikeL
|
15.630 | The WideBodyStuds vs. The Bookworms | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Jan 28 1992 16:38 | 1 |
|
|
15.631 | 6 down, 12 to go | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Jan 28 1992 22:26 | 28 |
|
This one was over early. Purdue has a *serious* quickness
problem at guard. You can get away with that against a Michigan team
that doesn't have much guard play, but the Hoosiers have (I believe) the
best defense at guard in the country right now.
The really bright spot of this game, besides the fact that it was
Indiana's largest margin of victory ever over the Boilers, was the continued
excellent play of Calbert Cheaney. He's not o looking for shots, he's
playing good defense and hitting the boards hard. If he continues to play
this well, things will stay opened up for Bailey, Anderson, and Graham, and
scoring shouldn't be a problem on most nights.
Disappointed, but not surprised, to hear that they might redshirt
Lindemann next year. Hope they won't be leaving themselves a little short
on the front line.
Next week will make four straight Tuesdays on ESPN. The other
coaches in the leagues are calling the new schedule Bob Knight Tuesday.
Very wierd arrangement, but shouldn't hurt recruiting any.
Next up: Michigan St. on Saturday in East Lansing
tom
|
15.632 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 08:30 | 29 |
| re 2
Cool p_name, /Donny !! But you air: Purdue awaits nuke widebody C
Glenn Robinson to roll off a prop48. Meanwhile IU ain't never tasted
the prop48 meat.
re 1
One key is that with Alan in the middle Eric cain play facing the hoop
where he's much more effective, and also less prone to tiring and foul
woes. Another is the emergence of GGraham. He's a totally different
player from last year, and a much better one. Those "torture camp"
practices are really paying off and he looks like an NBA prospect all
of a sudden.
Damon Bailey too.His defense has shown up, finallly.
Speaking a beat-camp phsyco-torture (which Dr. Inga would deplore if
the myth were true, but isn't) what about all those victims, all those
mentally devastated ex-players sitting behind the Bob-bench last night?
I guess John Moneystein would say the brainwashing paid off eh?
This Bob-squad is, IMNSHO, executing the Bob-system at the highest
level, right now at least, ball handling, picking, weaving, defending,
passing, shot selecting, lane filling, and everything else since the
75-76 squad. Wouldn't be prudent to swing them nito that level a
proficiency, not as physically talented, but O what a "team"!
MrT
|
15.633 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 08:48 | 15 |
| The Hoosiers are 6-0 in the Big10 yet have not played a tought road
game yet, having played only two on the road and those against the
Mildcats and the Badgers. There is steal much for them to prove and
their stretch drive is gonna be brutal with trips to Ohio State,
Minnesota, Ohio State, and Illinois.
We'll see. Is the State game in East Lansing?
Btw, the other Big10 coaches are sneering that ESPN's Tuesday night
should be renamed "Bob Knight Tuesday on ESPN." I agree! Should
help recruiting, which right now is not looking too good.
Hey Tom, any news on this 6-3 kid IU recruited out a Terre Haute South?
MrT
|
15.634 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 08:49 | 5 |
| whoops, they ain't gonna play Ohio State twice in that stretch drive
on the road, my mistake. It'll be MIchigan, Minnesota, Ohio State,
Illinois.
MrT
|
15.635 | Will the shame never end? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 29 1992 09:38 | 8 |
|
> <<< Note 15.634 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnight" >>>
^^^^^^^^
A vicious and unwarranted slur on Francois Voltaire!
glenn
|
15.636 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 10:44 | 6 |
| So MorT, are you actually saying that this Whoosier team,
should/could have some expectations placed on them? That maybe
they have a little more talent than say, Northwestern or Amherst
College?
/Don
|
15.637 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Wed Jan 29 1992 10:45 | 16 |
|
Personally I wouldn't mind if they showed IU every tuesday nite. The way
they excute their offense is a joy to watch and Chris Reynolds on defense
is worth the price of admission all by himself.
I think Bob's real happy with this team. If he wasn't he'd have reamed GGraham
six ways to sunday over that showboating missed dunk. Especially considering
just a minute before he tried to jam one home instead of dishing the rock to
the trailer.
Alan Henderson keeps improving. If he can continue they just might take the
big one...
mike
|
15.638 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 11:39 | 18 |
| > So MrT, are you actually saying that this Hoosier team, should/
>could have some expectations blah blah blaa-aah...
I from the beginning have documented that these Hoosiers are at a
talent level well above the recent past including the '87 Titleists.
But unlike the Titleists they don't have a true center and have shown
a propensity for getting beat up along the baseline even when they're
winning. Going up against a nuke-widebody operation they'll need to
continue shooting from the outside picking up forced fouls and
executing at their current high level a efficiency or they're daidmeat.
Which is exactly what Dick Vitale said last night and I agree.
Btw, it sure looks like "the most diappointing team of the year" has
benefited mightily from the benchings and reamings that befell Eric/
Calbert/Damon, eh?
MrT
|
15.639 | 1992 HOOSIERS = 1975 HOOSIERS! | DYPSS1::ROPER | NFC RULES! | Wed Jan 29 1992 11:42 | 27 |
| Simply AMAZING! All of a sudden we have IU and Bob Knight supporters
crawling out of the woodwork! Where oh where were you MrT, when only
ACC Chris and the WILDCAT were proclaiming IU to be a Final Four team
at the beginning of the season? I believe it was you who was belly
aching about this being one of the *POOREST* IU teams in recent memory.
Now all of a sudden they're being mentioned in the same breath as the
'75-'76 teams!!!
Someone stop me, I'm laughing myself to death!!! Let's see if I
understand how this little game works. I think that UK is really a
pretty pitiful squad having only one *LEGITIMATE* college player in
Jamal Mashburn. Therefore I think they'll only win one more game the
rest of the season. That game being the one tonight in Lexington
against Ole Miss. Now, If I follow correctly, if UK wins more than one
game that must mean that Rick Pitino is the greatest coach on the
PLANET!!!
Ha, Ha, Ha! You IU fans certainly have a great *MARKETING PLOY*!
Face if B-Ball fans, if IU doesn't make it to at least the final eight
this year, it will be a major choke to be explained by one Bob Knight.
If they don't make the Final Four, it can be considered at the very
least to be a *VERY POOR COACHING* job turned in by Bob Knight.
HTH's
WILDCAT
|
15.640 | MrT oughta work for the SuperBowlHypeCommittee | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Jan 29 1992 11:54 | 9 |
| Here, here, 'Cat! Not only that but just yesterday I predicted that
there was no way a very skeery IU outfit was not gonna lay an awful
pasting on Purdue. MorT countered by saying he thought_a upset was
possible.
Result? Gene Keady's worst loss of all time! Ha!!11
- ACC Chris
|
15.641 | poor Rope is having a /Don-Crock fantasy attack | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 12:53 | 43 |
| >1192 HOOSIERS = 1975 HOOSIERS!
Never said that. Said something quite different. Your failure to
show a quote on this will stand as tacit admission of your misquote.
>I believe it was you who was bellyaching about this being one of the
>*POOREST* IU teams in recent memory.
Never said that either. The record will show that I said they were
overrated as a preseason #2 due to a weak frontline and the widebody
UCLAn nukes and Jamaal Mashburn proved me right. I also went on to
say that these Hoosiers would go into a tumult (they did, with their
three stars hitting the bench) absorb some losses, sink in the ratings
to about 18th (didn't happen, they sunk to about 10th with inspiring
wins at St. John's and Cincinnati) and then move back into the top
ten.
Your failure to show a quote on this will stand as tacit admission that
you misquoted me.
I still may be roughly right on IU's season. They haven't played a
tough road game in weeks (Cincinnati) and must go to East Lansing and
then on to six additional toughies and history tells us that they'll
probably pick up 2-4 losses en route, which'd leave them with 4-6
total losses and somewhere in the lower half of the top ten, which is
where I said they'd end up anyway.
Setting aside your self-serving fantasies, tellit: IU has no true
center and absolutely no depth along the front-line. They don't have
anybody to match up against a big guard. Their outside shooting has
been inconsistent at best.
On the other hand, with young Alan holding his own in the middle and
Eric facing the basket and Calbert finally playing some D, if their
shooting holds up at about 50% from the floor executing at the level
they are right now they'll be nearly impossible to beat unless you're
Duke/Arkansas/UCLA or somesuch.
Hope this helps clear up joe self-serving fuzzy-haided "mistakes."
You're welcome.
MrT
|
15.642 | IU fans .neq. termites | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:21 | 11 |
|
According to the post-game reports, Knight was trying very hard to get
hot about Graham's slam-brick, but one of the assistants pointed to the score
and he just let it go. Bet it comes up in the film session, though.
Haven't heard anything at all about what kind of senior year Steve
Hart from Terre Haute is having, but I don't see him getting much PT next year
anyway.
tom (who's never been in any woodwork, but think's Eric Anderson's disappearing
into it on a regular basis)
|
15.643 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 15:01 | 4 |
| Whoa, but Eric's been canning the treys and Js. Much needed in light
of the doubles Calbert was seeing earlier in the year.
MrT
|
15.644 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jan 29 1992 15:55 | 7 |
| Hey Tom, does Bob have another scholarship to give for next year
or is he done?
Lesee, Nover and Eric graduate, but PatKnight, PGraham, and Brian
Evans come in from the redshirt.
MrT
|
15.645 | If they're so bad, how'd they beat IU? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Jan 29 1992 17:13 | 11 |
| T,
If you figure 13 current players (10 plus 3 redshirts), the loss of
Anderson and Meeks and the addition of Hart, they should have 1 scholarship
left they could use for next year. I doubt if they'll use it, though. It's
unlikely there's anybody left for the spring signing period that will be good
enough to use it on. More likely they'll save it till next fall and hope they
can put it to good use for the following season, when they'll really need some
help.
tom
|
15.646 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jan 30 1992 10:06 | 17 |
| I thought Meeks was a junior and Nover a senior. Whatever, here might
be the starting lineup for next year:
F Calbert
F Brian Evans
C Alan
G Damon
G GGraham
Of course, PGrhaham might end up at F in a small lineup, but I doubt he
has the physicality needed there - especially with a small nonphysical
forward like Calbert on the other side.
Who knows, maybe as his PT slides in favor of Salvidori Montross might
rn to t homeland and start learning how play the game right.
MrT
|
15.647 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | that Sir, is a_inebriate fabrication | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:06 | 7 |
| >Who knows, maybe as his PT slides in favor of Salvidori Montross might
>rn to t homeland and start learning how play the game right.
But Purdue will have Robinson next year. Oh I see, he'll sit on the bench
and learn from Glenn. Oh yeah good idea....
;^)
|
15.648 | nukewideobystudcity | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jan 30 1992 12:38 | 9 |
| I've seen Glenn Robinson play (in IHSAA Title game, where he smoked
Alan Henderson, and in a All-Star tilt) and this guy is awesome.
Once Gene Keady gets ahold of a talent a this magnitude (many in
Hoosierland regard him as the best out a the state since Shawn Kemp
and then Larry Bird before that) look for Purdue to make a serious
run against Michigan/Indiana/Ohio State for a Big10 crown and maybe
more...
MrT
|
15.649 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Jan 30 1992 20:06 | 12 |
| T,
It's not just Robinson either. They've got a JC transfer sitting
out this year named Kenny Williams. People who've seen him at games say he's
about an inch taller than Robinson, and a little bulkier. He apparently more
than holds his own with Robinson in practices.
Steve Hart, btw, apparently has been averaging about 26 points, 7
boards, 5 assists, 3 steals, and 3 blocks. Should be a big help for the
Hoosiers in a couple of years when the current group of guards is all gone.
tom
|
15.650 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:08 | 11 |
| IU boys,
If my memory doesn't fail me, hasn't IU handled Purdue pretty
well over the years? Not putting Keady down, but rarely do
the Boilers worry the Hoosiers in Bloomington, n-est-ce-pas?
And occasionally they give IU a tussle in West Lafayette.
Plenty of things cain happen in a year,sheeeit, enjoy this one
as you could be dancin' in Minny come spring.
MikeL
|
15.651 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Wilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohn | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:20 | 8 |
|
Actually Mike, Purdue leads the series all time by a wide margin. They
mentioned the stats the other night and it was 95 + wins for Purdue and 55+
for IU. Bobby is better than 500 against them and Keady is slight less than
500 against them. Of all the teams in the Big Ten I would venture a quess
that Purdue has given them the most trouble...
mike
|
15.652 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:25 | 8 |
| Purdue leads the all-time series by a lot, but things have been
decidedly in Indiana's favor since Knight's arrival.
Minny in the spring sounds real nice. The next two games (at Michigan
State and at Illinois) should go a long way towards show just
how good a shot the Hoosiers have at making it there.
tom
|
15.653 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:33 | 15 |
| Thanks guys,
Actually I should have made it clear that I was lookin' at the
Knight era. But dat shows ya that my BBall knowledge pales nexted
to y'all.
BTW Mikey,
I did some research on the LSU-UK matchup and I'll acceed to yo'
superior BBall knowledge. I was ROPED in by the 'CAT.
I'll flip-flop. UK should win. That's what I git for my
tongue in cheek analysis.
MikeL
|
15.654 | and college cheeleaders are all pure of heart ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Wilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohn | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:39 | 12 |
|
I wouldn't claim I have superior bball knowledge just that I watch as many
college basketball games as I can.
Heck the other night the Celtics were in a tough struggle with the the Bullets
and IU was blowing Purdue off the court and I still spent more time watching
the IU game.
The beauty of the college game is that they do not allowing traveling, palming
etc. and it's a real team game where a coaches stratgies make a difference.
NBA is more of a one on one league where the pecking order decides who gets
away with what...
|
15.655 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | WILDCATS of 1992 > 1975 hoosiers | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:41 | 13 |
| MikeL, color me confused and dissapointed! I'd never try anything so
underhanded that would even remotely associate me with the actions of
IU faithful.
After lunch I'll post the starting lineups of UK and LSU over in 207.
Let the noters decide then who has the most talented squad. Heck, I
don't even need to do it (but I will), when you've got O'Neal vs. 6-7
people it's no contest.
There is absolutely no way UK can stop this Man-Child from wrecking
havoc on this once proud, tradition filled, basketball program.
WILDCAT
|
15.656 | 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Jan 31 1992 10:08 | 15 |
|
>> There is absolutely no way UK can stop this Man-Child from wrecking
>> havoc on this once proud, tradition filled, basketball program.
>> WILDCAT
Sigh... imitating the literary style of another. Don't tell me 'CAT that
you're about to go work fer a small software company, too.
Color me confused and disappointed also,
MikeL
|
15.657 | There's no place like home, there's ... | DYPSS1::ROPER | WILDCATS of 1992 > 1975 hoosiers | Fri Jan 31 1992 11:11 | 15 |
| MikeL, I just decided to try something a bit new. MrT and his merry
band of IU sheep (excluding the totally objective Mr. Simpson of
course) seem extremely content in living in a FANTASY world.
I've tried it for a couple of days this week, and it works
great. It goes something like this. I deliberately bash and demean UK
and it chances then when they win, I look like a hero. I mean the
congratulatory mail messages I received this week after the Ole Miss
upset were incredible!
Alas, you and Mr. Childs have snapped me back to reality. However,
this current group of Wildcats IMO could compete nicely with the 1975
indiana hoosiers :-)
WILDCAT
|
15.658 | Good work 'CAT, 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Fri Jan 31 1992 11:29 | 1 |
|
|
15.659 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Jan 31 1992 12:43 | 30 |
| Shaddap Mildcat. You tacitly conceded that I went on record months
ago that this IU squad is more talented than any in years but suffers
from too many guards too small a front-line and no front-line depth
and no true center. But, unlike all IU teams since '81, this squad
has oodles a speed, quickness, and athletic ability.
re: Childs
You're so right. That's why I cain't watch the NBA. I mean, here's
a sport where they're seriously talking about raising the basket to
increase the level of difficulty yet they won't enforce the rules that
are there to give the game its "basketballness" in the first place.
Last year Len Elmore was the color main for the T-Wolves. After a
player galloped for about 4 steps, palming the ball, hooking his
defender trying to work his way around teammates who'd been standing
in the lane for about 20 seconds, as he chucked up a shot he was
intentionally fouled and the ref blew the whistle but he continued to
go for the hoop travelling a 2nd time and got the continuation...
... and Len started saying that the integrity of the game was being
threatened by constant travelling/palming/camping/pushing/holding etc.
and that if they called the NBA the way they do college "spectacular"
plays would be truly so and also much less frequent but the overall
game would be much more enjoyable to watch ESPECIALLY IF THEY WENT
TO A 45 SECOND CLOCK SO SOME STRATEGY COULD BE USED.
Len don't announce for the T-Wolves no more.
MrT
|
15.660 | The NBA could be sooooooooooo much better ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 31 1992 13:38 | 11 |
| re: NBA
Good point, MorT. Also consider the fack that (as BobHunt recently
reported) a certain rookie for the Hornets got whistled for a crucial
end-game foul, only to be told later by the refs that, in due time,
he'll start getting those kinds of calls.
Yuk.
- ACC Chris
|
15.661 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Jan 31 1992 14:11 | 6 |
| Agreed. College refs cain be bad (especially Big10 refs) but they
call 'em as they see 'em and don't give a rat's ass if it's a
Jimmy Jackson or Christian Laettner that gets fouled out, they see
the foul they make the call.
MrT
|
15.662 | Julie, see the guy w/the red sweater? He's > Dean... | IMBACQ::SZABO | Numbers 7 & 8 RULES ! | Fri Jan 31 1992 14:47 | 22 |
| I've mostly next-unseened this note lately, but the last few replies
about NBA "fantasketball" vs. College basketball_the_way_it_should_be_
played strikes an increasing sore spot with me. I see more and more
pre-high schoolers, including my daughter (who's shaping up to be a
fine athlete), picking up the bad habits that make fantasketball what
it is. Why? That's what these kids watch. They don't know that 4
steps on a lay-up is travelling. They don't know what palming the ball
is. They don't get any basic fundamentals from watching fantasketball.
But, they do know the triple-axle through the legs twice upside down
slam dunk real good!
Trying to break my daughter's bad habit of palming/carrying the ball
(all kids seem to be doing this, btw), I realized that she needs to
watch less fantasketball and more college ball, that's why I've been
turning her on to ESPN at night, instead of TBS and SportsChannel.
Kind of an absurd thought (like ACC Chris' poll) but, I wish they'd
make NBA games R-rated, so that kids under 17 couldn't see them, or
else simply cut out all of the "censored" parts, but then they'd have
trouble filling-up a half hour with quality basketball...
Hawk
|
15.663 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Wilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohn | Fri Jan 31 1992 14:48 | 11 |
|
Refs can be bad or good at all levels T, but I'd take the Big Ten refs over
the Big East's anyday. Like you said they call them as they see em' but they
also allow the game to have some flow to it. In the Big East it's just one
whistle after the other.
Gotta be the 6-foul limit. It turns people like John H. right off and it's
starting to get to me too. When a college game takes 2 1/2 hour without any
overtime that's bad.
mike
|
15.664 | | FSBIC::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Jan 31 1992 15:08 | 10 |
| It's not just the 6-foul limit that makes the last 5 minutes last
forever. It's the timeouts after missed baskets and the constant,
constant fouling. This problem doesn't seem to be as bad in the NBA.
I don't know what to do about it for college ball.
The problem also seems to be the worst in the Big East for some reason.
Don't know why. I do agree that the college game is purer than the
NBA, FWIW.
John
|
15.665 | I personally wouldn't send *my* daughter, mind you ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 31 1992 15:17 | 9 |
| Easy problem to solve Hawk: Send your daughter to one of them summer
BobCamp's that Knight runs.
She'll learn fundamentals that will carry her through any amount of NBA
action she might be forced to watch, although I cain't vouch for her
mental condition when she finishes.
- ACC Chris
|
15.666 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cuimhnich, 13 February 1692 | Fri Jan 31 1992 15:34 | 20 |
| > Easy problem to solve Hawk: Send your daughter to one of them summer
> BobCamp's that Knight runs.
>
> She'll learn fundamentals that will carry her through any amount of NBA
> action she might be forced to watch, although I cain't vouch for her
> mental condition when she finishes.
I had a French teacher in Freshman year that I HATED. In fact,
every student that ever had her HATED her. Nobody got better than
a C. Nobody.
But, the next year, all of her students were the best in Sophomore
French and we really began to appreciate her.
Bob Knight is a leader in the finest tradition...
'Saw
|
15.667 | Wanted: Slow 7-footer with bad hair | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Sun Feb 02 1992 16:41 | 31 |
|
Bad weekend for IU and it's fans.
On Saturday, Michigan State completely dominated the Hoosiers from
start to finish. Bailey and Cheaney started the game a combined 0-9 from the
field; Cheaney recovered to finish with 17 for the game (on 7-18 shooting), but
Bailey ended up with 0 points and 4 fouls. Greg Graham again led Indiana, this
time with 23. Knight may HAVE to put him in the starting lineup soon.
The most worrisome thing for the Hoosiers, and the reason IU fans aren't
convinced about this team, is that the inside problems surfaced again in a big
way. Indiana was completely incapable of handling MSUs front-line players
(Peplowski, Miller, Stephens, etc.) on either end of the floor. There was no
inside scoring for the Hoosiers, little rebounding (final margin for MSU was
something like +16), and little interior defense. For the game, there were
26 rebounds off MSU missed shots; Indiana grabbed 12 and the Spartans grabbed
14. Any team that gives up more offensive boards than it gets in defensive
boards is going to lose big-time, and that's what happened. With a break or
two in the brackets this might be a Final Four team, but I don't see a
championship anywhere on the horizon.
Then, on Sunday, Ohio State grabbed control of the conference race with
a convincing win over Michigan. OSU, even though they've had some problems
recently, seems to me to be getting better and better. They're learning how to
use and not use Robinson and they're starting to get good contributions from
several front-line players off the bench. Michigan, on the other hand,
continues to be a team that only plays about 10-15 minutes every game. Wonder
if Fisher wishes he'd only gotten about 3 of the "Fab Five"? Sure would have
made his job a lot easier.
tom
|
15.668 | 7 footer with bad hair? Uwe Flop again?! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Patrick Buchanan for UX | Sun Feb 02 1992 19:20 | 50 |
| You summed it up. Not only are the Hoosiers weak across the front
line and without a true center, they have no depth up front. They
were completely dominated underneath. I don't remember a single
offensive rebound by the Hoosiers. The front-line shot a collective
15-39 from the field.
I was unhappy that they didn't slice the zone with guard-drives and
dishes, but Damon got inside a few times early and, as is his habit,
either got the ball jammed back in his face or struggled just to
maintain possession. So maybe they decided to just try and shoot over
the zone.
GGraham has been their best player this season. It's hard to believe
that this former bricklayer was their only effective jump shooter
yesterday.
The only silver lining is that the Hoosiers got a lot of open shots
with their offense, they just couldn't hit anything. Wide open 5
footers, 10 footers, 18 footers, didn't matter, they all seemed to hit
the back of the rim. If they had shot around 50% it woulda been a game
even despite the utter domination by the Spartan big men... but they
shot 29% from the floor.
I watched this game with a college buddy, and he maintained that they
still could make the Final Four. I don't think so, their record
against top level teams is not all that impressive (4-3 by my count),
and they have 7 relatively tough road games left.
The State game thoroughly exposed their two major weaknesses: Spotty
shooting and a front-line that's thin and prone to intimidatin by big
quick players, just as it was by Kaintucky and UCLA. IU is slated to
see several such lineups down the stretch: Iowa (twice), State again,
and visits to Ohio State and Michigan.
They need to perfect what they showed against Michigan: relentless
defensive pressure, near perfect execution all around, and a lot of
guard penetration resulting in either baskets or foul shots.
It's bad luck to play a road game after your host has suffered a bitter
loss. State had just lost at home to the Fab5; the Illini will be mad
as hornets about giving the Mildcats their first conference win in
nearly two years.
I sure would like to see Eric Anderson assert himself. Young Alan
Henderson can only do so much up front.
Meanwhile, if State could only find some consistency with a little luck
they could end up making a run at a 2nd Big10 Title in 3 years.
MrT
|
15.669 | BUT, but, they are as good as the 1975 team!! | DYPSS1::ROPER | WILDCATS of 1992 > 1975 hoosiers | Mon Feb 03 1992 10:05 | 17 |
| re 15.632:
>> This Bob-squad is, IMNSHO, executing the Bob-system at the highest
>> level, right now at least, ball handling, picking, weaving,
>> defending, passing, shot selecting, lane filling, and
>> everything else since the 75-76 squad.
HAHAHAHAHA! Looks to me like they need to work a little on ball
handling, picking, weaving, defending, passing, shot selectin, lane
filling, and everything else since 1975-1976!!!
MrT, if this is executing the Bob-system at the highest level, then
they are in serious trouble!!!
Great analysis 'T :-)
WILDCAT
|
15.670 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Patrick Buchanan for UX | Mon Feb 03 1992 10:29 | 25 |
| Nobody ever said "they are as good as the 1975 team." I said that
they'd been executing as near flawlessly as seen since that team,
which was not to say that that would continue, especially in light
of the fack they hadn't played a tough road game in the conference
yet, and that they are seriously flawed - as has been observed by
Billy Packer and others.
My preseason prediction is looking fairly good, although I hope I'm
proved wrong. Ohio State should take first place which I got, I was
wrong on which Michigan would vie for second place, and Indiana may
indeed finish third unless either Henderson or Anderson really kicks it
in on the inside play as far as defense, rebounding, and close-in
shots.
So while you fallaciously contend that I was wrong about something I'm
looking righter and righter with each passing week.
Unlike the '76 and '81 teams, this squad MUST play near perfect ball to
compete at the highest level. They're more like the '87 team, and may
have more overall talent than that team while still being weaker: i.e.,
the '87 team could shoot all day from outside, had a long-armed 6-11
center who blocked shots and hit the boards (but could do little else),
and had two or more players for each of the five roles.
MrT
|
15.671 | 1992 hooisers >= 1987 hooisers | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Mon Feb 03 1992 11:40 | 8 |
| Let's see if I follow. Before debacle against MSU, IU was >= the 1975
team. After the *POOR* performance this weekend they are >= 1987 team!
Gotcha!
You're getting righter and righter? NOT! How about you're getting
more SUBJECTIVE and doing more back peddling each successive week!
WILDCAT
|
15.672 | Great call Chris! | RAVEN1::TURNER | A'64ToplessTripower4-SpeedGTOtogo! | Mon Feb 03 1992 11:42 | 9 |
| I understand now....
They could be like the '76 team, then again they may be like the
'87 team, but with out a doubt they're an exact replica of the '81
team, on the otherhand..... and maybe.....
and they may or may not win their next game.....
Come on Chris, Quit fooling around on Mr. T's terminal!
|
15.673 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Patrick Buchanan for UX | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:22 | 35 |
| You geeks are real geniuses, huh?
There are two elements in any athletic team's chances for success:
1) Talent, of two kinds:
a) overall talent
b) talent for specific roles
2) Level of execution
This year's Hoosiers have more of 1.a than in quite a while, but even
for a team whose played more out of position players than any other
college hoops program, they're weaker in category 1.b than they've been
in memory, having tried three forwards at center and two guards at forward
and on a lineup filled with guards have the worst outside shooters in
the conference except for maybe Minnesota.
Level of execution changes through time. IU's was very bad early in
the year but the UCLAn nuclearwidebodystuds served as a loud wakeup
call and they stepped up their level of execution to the highest level,
so overall this year in category 2 they get an A minus.
Trouble is, they must execute perfectly to compete at the highest level.
They've been blown out by UCLA and Michigan State, and had to work hard
to avert being blown out by Kentucky who led the entire game.
No rebounding, no inside defense, no inside offense, shaky outside
shooting. No true center, no quality front-line substitute.
If that's the third best team in the country I'm the Dalai Lama.
MrT
|
15.674 | Is "Air Knight" next ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Is that a great new Pepsi can or what? | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:30 | 12 |
| The Hoosiers will go far in March. Knight looks as contented with his
team as he has in a long, long time. That's always a telling sign with
him. He's been filling in their talent gaps for years and this year is
no exception.
On a more serious note ... Did I see "The General" doing a Domino's
commercial ??? On the ACC network, no less. What is this world coming
to ??? All my faith in Robert Montgomery Knight went out the window as
he lifted the gooey slice to his mouth, chomped down and then smiled for
the camera. Tsk, tsk, tsk ...
Bob Hunt
|
15.675 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Party at Ground Zero | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:42 | 8 |
|
Yeah I was taken back too Bob. First the quick blurp and I says to meself
is that Knight? Sure enough he comes back and it is. Could be he's donating
his money to charities. Could be pocketing the money too. Wouldn't blame
him if he was.....
mike
|
15.676 | Dean == Bob? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:48 | 28 |
| > Did I see "The General" doing a Domino's commerical???
Oh yes, you saw it all right. And saw it. And saw it. And saw it!
They must've run that spot *AT LEAST* 20 times. I've seen Bob's mug
now enough times to last me a lifetime ...
re: IU needs a 7-footer wif a bad haircut
Despite DougRoss' relentless pestering, "Doctor Double Zero" as he's
now called by his teammates is probably exactly what the Hoosiers could
use. He's big. He rebounds. And he's really developing some nice
moves around the bucket. For better or worse though, he's actually
competing for playing time with fellow center Kevin Salvadori, who's
currently leading the ACC in blocked shots! Sadly they're both too
slow to play on the floor at the same time against any team with
reasonable quickness. Happily they're both proving why big men go to
learn the game from Dean. They've both improved *significantly*,
although they're still woefully inconsistent.
re: BobKnight
Okay folks, listen up. I've read some disturbing news in my latest
Carolina Blue that is gonna force me to eat some *major* crow on the
Bob vs. Dean debate. Stay tuned for details, but suffice to say "The
Great Debate" may at long last be coming to an end.
- ACC Chris
|
15.677 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Party at Ground Zero | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:53 | 13 |
|
> re: BobKnight
> Okay folks, listen up. I've read some disturbing news in my latest
> Carolina Blue that is gonna force me to eat some *major* crow on the
> Bob vs. Dean debate. Stay tuned for details, but suffice to say "The
> Great Debate" may at long last be coming to an end.
What debate? It's a world wide (minus 1) aknowledge fact that Bob is
the greater of the two...
a more worthwile debate that you just might win is Dean vs. Thompson....
|
15.678 | Guess what just froze over!!!!!!! ;^) | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Feb 03 1992 13:02 | 1 |
|
|
15.679 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pat Buchanan for U.S. President | Mon Feb 03 1992 14:35 | 7 |
| >but suffice to say "The Great Debate" may at long last be coming to
>an end.
Given all the accounts that've been balanced over the last week or
so even this extremely unlikely event wouldn't totally shock me.
MrT
|
15.680 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pat Buchanan for U.S. President | Mon Feb 03 1992 14:37 | 6 |
| False alarm. I went back for a second gander and saw the title which
read "Dean == Bob?"
You're looking for a draw, and hell hasn't yet frozen over buddy.
MrT
|
15.681 | 10 left, and they need 8 (at least) | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Feb 04 1992 22:38 | 13 |
|
Solid but unspectacular win tonight for the Hoosiers over a bad
Illinois squad. Greg Graham again played well off the bench, and Cheaney's
finally starting to look like an All-American (21 pts., 8 rebs., 3 steals).
Henderson looked good in limited action, and Matt Nover completely controlled
an un-inspired Deon Thomas. Down-side: Bailey's once again struggling, and
this game's poor shooting performance will cause Anderson's 43% field-goal
shooting to drop a bit lower. He's slowly but surely becoming invisible.
Next up: Iowa on Sunday in Bloomington. Wish the Hawkeyes still
played that 40-minute-all-out-in-your-face-while-you-run-by-me press.
tom
|
15.682 | False Advertising | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pat Buchanan for U.S. President | Wed Feb 05 1992 10:58 | 28 |
| Again I agree, Tom. The good news is that Calbert hit the boards with
some gusto last night, the bad news is that he was finally doing it
against someone his own size (and with less ability).
The Hoosiers shot something like 25-54 from the field, and that equates
into a ace kicking if they're at Ohio State or Iowa or somesuch.
Damon is fading. He needs to find his shot. To his credit he did just
that during the two stretches when his mates needed it most.
One wonders why he insists on driving to the hoop. Yes, he has fine
court sense and is a very good dribbler and cain do a good job getting
inside; but when he gets there he usually gets bitch-slapped with
leather to the face, or sometimes simply has it stolen or a jump ball.
Yeah yeah it's true that he's one a the most talented hoops players in
history (on par with Lew Alcindor and Moses Malone coming out a H.S.),
and yeah it's true he cain leap 36", but for some unknown reason Damon
has settled on jumping only about 12-16" off the floor [myjohnson],
usually a slow release jump and not a quick jump, and is overpowered
defensively.
Given that we all know that he cain jump 3 feet from the floor, why
doesn't Damon just sky over everybody and slamjamthankUmam?
Dunno.
MrT
|
15.683 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 1960-69Celtics > 1960-69Lakers | Wed Feb 05 1992 12:15 | 4 |
| What's with those Hoosier warmup pants? Do they moonlight as
candy stripers or is there a barber shop quartet on campus?
/Don
|
15.684 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 05 1992 14:49 | 8 |
| MrT, you answered your own question. The reason Damon doesn't fly to
the hoop ala Rex Chapman (who some moron compared him to in High
School) is because he was indeed a case of "FALSE ADVERTISING".
Don't get me wrong, Bailey is a *good* ball player, just not the
"SUPER STUD" Bob Knight and John Feinstein would've had us to believe.
WILDCAT
|
15.685 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Feb 05 1992 15:36 | 9 |
| I agree. In fack, I never heard the Chapman comparison, but when
all the talk about how good Damon was got out I immediately envisioned
him to be a Rex-type player: 6-5, stringy but strong, quick, high-
jumping... very athletic.
His potential is more in the Scott Skiles mode, which he might still
attain and ain't all that bad either.
MrT
|
15.686 | Another possible explanation ... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Feb 05 1992 15:50 | 13 |
| > Given that we all know that he cain jump 3 feet from the floor, why
> doesn't Damon just sky over everybody and slamjamthankUmam?
> Dunno.
> MrT
It could be, as was mentioned, false advertising.
But it could also be that he is being shackled by a coach who prefers
a more conservative style of play. Such things have been known to happen.
|
15.687 | Ain't been that way for years | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Feb 05 1992 20:19 | 13 |
|
> It could be, as was mentioned, false advertising.
> But it could also be that he is being shackled by a coach who prefers
> a more conservative style of play. Such things have been known to happen.
Of course, anyone who'd actually WATCHED INDIANA PLAY over the last
several years would know that's not the case.
HTH.
tom
|
15.688 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Feb 06 1992 10:08 | 23 |
| Damon suffering from Bob's team-style? This threadbare canard
has been trotted out before with no success. Bob has proven
over the years that he's highly flexible with the type of talent
he's working with. Who cain forget the NCAA tourney matchup
against the Runnin' Rabble when the bookies said the Hoosiers had
no chance against UNLV's speed. So the Hoosiers come out running
and beat a more talented team. Or when the skeptics said that
Isiah would be stifled in Bob's system. Instead Isiah had a green
light to penetrate with the ball, crash the boards, or, within
limits, work one-on-one situations - all of which he did on yet
another Title team.
The list goes on. Damon has a green light to drive the lane. It's
hurt against teams with big quick front-lines, but Bob lets him
persist on the bet that he'll develop the ability to present enough
of a credible inside scoring threat to either draw defenders and
dish assists, pick up fouls, or actually score.
I cain't think of anything that Damon's not being allowed to do. In
fack, nobody has a red light on this team right now, even the awful
Matt Nover and the no-shot Chris Reynolds are chucking it up.
MrT
|
15.689 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Feb 06 1992 13:07 | 28 |
| Indiana 7 - 1
Ohio State 7 - 1
State 4 - 3
Iowa 4 - 3
Minnesota 5 - 4
Michigan 4 - 4
Purdue 4 - 4
Wisconsin 2 - 6
Nrthwstn. 1 - 7
Whoda thunk that Mene Gene would have his squad tied with the Fab5
or 5 Xs or whatever they're called ... The conference makes the turn
into the 2nd half of the double round-robin after this weekend ...
Indiana faces a road schedule that'll make it nearly impossible for
them to win the Title: Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, Iowa
... the Hoosiers probably need to win four of these to tie Ohio State,
or win three and win at Ohio State ... the Fab5 or 5 Xs have the opposite,
a young team with not too many tough road games left (go Steve, ruin this
team !!) ... State has been very inconsistent, if they fix that they
might vie for 2nd or even possibly the Title ... Minnesota looks to
fade ... I was wrong about Illinois, Purdue will be the surprise team
... Tracy Webster, UW is awesome, he replaces Respert on my all-frosh
squad at PG ... best centers: Acie, Pep, then Chris ...
Big10 Tom
|
15.690 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Feb 06 1992 13:12 | 11 |
| >or win three and win at Ohio State
Correction: win two and win at Ohio State... 8^o
All Big10 so far: F - Calbert
F - JJ (plays SF a lot)
C - Acie
G - Tracy
G - Jalen
MrT
|
15.691 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Fri Feb 07 1992 10:32 | 17 |
| So Acie has a relatively bad game going up against his competition
for the best Big10 center in Peplowski and the Hawkeyes still beat
up on the visiting Spartans.
I'm glad they won, though. I'd a hate to have had the Hoosiers
going into Carver-Hawkeye with the Yellow & Black smarting from a
home loss.
This weekend's matchup will be quite interesting in terms of testing
how well Indiana's front-line cain do against an Acie Earl and a
pretty fair complement of big guys. I see this game as a defining
moment as to whether the Hoosiers cain make a run against the Buckeyes
for the Big10 Title.
Isn't it nice to have a real conference Title? I think so.
MrT
|
15.692 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:07 | 25 |
| 3 scheduling factors weigh upon the Hoosiers going into the 2nd
half of the 18 game double round-robin:
1) You either play 4 road games one half, 5 the other. Indiana
faces their 5 road game half.
2) You play 9 road games. Indiana's 4 road games thus far include
3 against the conference's 3 cupcakes (UN, UW, Illinois) and only
1 against a toughie (MSU). Their 5 remaining road games are all
against toughies: Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, Iowa.
3) They're tied with Ohio State; but OSU has been beaten only by
their competition, Indiana; and Indiana must play in Columbus.
Bottom line, some combination of OSU losses and Indiana road wins
must compile to keep the Hoosiers in contention for the Title.
Indiana cain be master of its own destiny by beating the Buckeyes
in that snakepit St. John Arena and going at least 3-1 at Williams
(another snakepit), Crisler, Mackey (yet another snakepit), and
Carver-Hawkeye.
A tall order for a not-so-tall team.
MrT
|
15.693 | Michigan beats 'em in b-ball, too! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:25 | 13 |
| Finally got to watch the Fab 5 for a bit yesterday, and man, are they
fun to watch! Webber put on a show - that one-handed-alley-oop slam
early on was spectacular. And late in the game King made a Jordan-type
move under the basket for a layup. The Fab 5 scored all of Michigan's
points.
The young Michigan squad showed some good character yesterday by
holding on on the road after blowing a big lead - the Irish managed to
get within 4 once.
Joe
|
15.694 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | John (Big Bad John) | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:59 | 36 |
| As the Wolverines mature they become the conferences wild card
during the second half.
As for Indiana's performance yesterday;
* They totally dominated at the guard position.
* Calbert Cheaney's playing a great floor game. It's hard to believe
this is the same guy who's been pushed around for the boards and
on D by UCLA, Kaintuck and State.
* Eric Anderson had a great game yesterday. True, he didn't shoot well
but who does going up against Acie? He blocked shots and grabbed
boards and played like the big main force IU so sorely lacks.
* Matt Nover ain't half bad. He's progressed, having learned how to
contribute despite hit limited abilities without detracting (too
much).
* If Damon Bailey cain shoot with the authority he did yesterday the
other major deficiency of the Hoosiers disappears and makes them
dangerous in the tourney.
* Iowa has a lotta front-line talent. Acie is a future NBA center.
Street is a player. Winters is a explosive widebody. Yesterday's
game is a good chart of how Indiana must play in order to win against
the widebody squads both in the 2nd half and the tourney.
Now we get to see how they'll do on the road. The history has been
disturbing for this squad, mainhandled by State, and by UCLA (and to
some degree Kaintuck) on neutral courts (the UK game was in Indy).
Indiana is still questionable cuz the great squads don't get blown out,
they lose in close ones when they do lose. We'll see.
MrT
|
15.695 | 9 down, 9 to go | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Feb 10 1992 18:59 | 14 |
|
Most amazing statistic from Sunday's Indiana game:
Cheaney had 13 rebounds!!!!
This is a guy that's been known to go an entire game without
grabbing a boardHe's definitely picked his game up a notch
over the last month. Now, if he could just remember where
he left his jump shot...
Next up: Wednesday in Williams Arena. Hope the Gophs don't
remember that 46 point loss last month in Bloomington.
tom
|
15.696 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Rodney Dangerfields>The Dream Team | Tue Feb 11 1992 09:24 | 8 |
|
I agree Tom, I was amazed at Calbert's board work last sunday. As T also
touched on Anderson played with fire for a change. Matt Nover has come a
long way. Didn't see to much of Alan Henderson. perhaps he's slacking off
in practice? Meeks has got to pop that shot more often. He so wide open
it's sin....
mike
|
15.697 | colors | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pynchon,Rushdie,Berger,Irving | Tue Feb 11 1992 14:58 | 4 |
| The Hoosiers visit the old barn tomorrow night in Minneapolis. MrT
will be there in red and white.
MrT
|
15.698 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IWantMySISwimsuitIssue! | Tue Feb 11 1992 15:01 | 4 |
| Hey MorT, is the game on ESPN? If so why don't you bring a
"Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" sign so we'll know it's you.
/Don
|
15.699 | What do BobKnight and Vanna White have in common? Both on @ 7:30 | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Feb 11 1992 15:59 | 11 |
| re: .-1 ("Is the game on ESPN?")
If it's Tuesday night then Indiana is on. I believe this will be the
*FOURTH* straight week that Hucksters (tm) have been on Tuesday night,
which is a tribute to the political muscle Bob has. Ever since his
moaning-and-groaning about the late night TV games (FWIW I think his
point is extremely valid) the Hoosiers have been almost as as much a
fixture at the 7:30 slot as Vanna White and Wheel-of-Fortune!
- ACC Chris
|
15.700 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Rodney Dangerfields>The Dream Team | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:05 | 6 |
|
which is fine with me. I love to watch a well coached team excute.
and no UNC doesn't qualify...too much moaning and bitching for calls...
mike
|
15.701 | | JENEVR::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Feb 11 1992 16:22 | 6 |
| > which is fine with me. I love to watch a well coached team excute
I much prefer it when Indiana is executed.
The Crazy Met
|
15.702 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Feb 11 1992 17:11 | 10 |
| Wearin' red'n'white T??
We didn't know ya owned BK undies.
Now try and get that by the ESPN censors.
MikeL
P.S.
Make up a sign " /Don is guilty"
8^)
|
15.703 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Feb 11 1992 17:55 | 13 |
|
This one's a Wednesday night game, but Indiana was already on
ESPN four straight times --- against Ohio St., Michigan, Purdue, and
Illinois. As I mentioned at the time, Big 10 coaches started calling
it "Bob Knight Tuesday on ESPN". And I loved it. Had to help recruiting.
The only thing I've heard about Henderson is that he's still a
little weak from that bout with the flu several weeks ago. Seems like a long
recovery, but I guess a 6-9 guy who drops from 202 to 192 is going to be
weak for a while
tom
|
15.704 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Rodney Dangerfields>The Dream Team | Wed Feb 12 1992 09:21 | 16 |
|
I was a bit surprised last night that Keady didn't blow his cork, with the
way his team blew the game last night. Usually the jacket's up in the third
row over those kind of losses.
Also IMHO JJ is the player of the year in college. Watching Shack last night
and saturday have left me convinced.
Anyone who caught Bill Walton's comments on Close-Up with Firestone about
Shack would be hard pressed to argue with him.
Shack had best better stay in school and learn how to shoot those free throws.
He was better last year. Speaks volumes for the lack of coaching Dale Brown
does...
mike
|
15.705 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pynchon,Rushdie,Berger,Irving | Wed Feb 12 1992 10:51 | 20 |
| I haven't seen anyone play as well as JJ. Laettner is awfully good,
but sometimes suffers from the collapse defenses. JJ does it all.
All the hype about Shaq has more to do with his NBA potential than
what he's doing right now.
The best college center ever should stand as the paradigm for the true
superstar college middlemain. That was, of course, the big redhaid,
Bill Walton.
I cain't put Shaq on the same level with Walton the way he's playing
right now. Walton solved the collapse Ds with pinpoint passing, and
by developing a menu of inside shots (the jump hook, the fade-J, the
finger roll)... where is this menu from Shaq?
Shaq is being praised for his considerable potential, not for his
current level of play. If you wanna see a C who cain fill it up and
block shots and change shots and move wihtout the ball and pass watch
Iowa's Acie Earl.
MrT
|
15.706 | | 30311::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Feb 12 1992 15:52 | 4 |
| Well we finally agree on something T. Walton is without a doubt the
best COLLEGE center ever. No question. I'd say if anyone disagrees they
prob'ly never saw him play.
Denny
|
15.707 | | DUGROS::ROSS | Rally roolz! | Wed Feb 12 1992 16:53 | 9 |
| Purdue looked terrible against Illinois last night... losing in OT
76-71. They had the game in the bag, but could not deny Deion
Thomas the ball down the stretch. No excuse for such shoddy defense
against Illinois' only good player.
The Boilers are bad and getting worse. Time for Mean Gene to
take one of those job offers he gets every year to go out west.
|
15.708 | It's still the same old story... | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Feb 12 1992 22:58 | 20 |
| The fat lady may have sung earlier than usual in the Big Ten race.
Indiana loses 71-67 at Minnesota, in a game that looked all to
familiar to people who watch Indiana more than occasionally. Outside shooting
was once again non-existent and Eric Anderson and Damon Bailey BOTH disappeared,
but rebounding (have I mentioned in here before that Indiana has this slight
rebounding problem? I thought that I had) was again the difference. Second
half rebounds were 17-5 Minnesota at one point, and for the game the Gophers
ended up with 19 (this is NOT a typo) offensive rebounds, the majority of
which ended up in scores. Minnesota played aggressively defensively, made both
open and tough shots, and generally outplayed Indiana more than the final score
indicated. With all of that, the Hoosiers had the ball 2 points down with under
20 seconds left, and didn't get off a shot.
Next up: Northwestern at home on Saturday
Michigan State at home next Wednesday
Ohio State on the road on the 23rd
tom
|
15.709 | No ESPN! | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Feb 13 1992 08:15 | 2 |
| How come the game wasn't on the BobTV lasted night?
Denny
|
15.710 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant-Rex) | Thu Feb 13 1992 09:22 | 38 |
| Same-o same-o. Even though anybody who knows the team would expect
them to be outrebounded, they were unable to outplay Minnesota on D
from the guard position. The U is a fine scrappy defensive team,
but Indiana missed dozens of open jumpers. While the surging GGraham
and the resurgent shot well, the guards shot 6-18.
Minnesota's big people (they have a huge center jokingly listed at
7-0 but who must be taller) gave Anderson and Henderson a lot of
trouble. Indiana never got the running game going and with that big
redhaid standing on the middle the pick n' weave looked more like
the dodge n' stumble.
No D on the ball, no running game, without these two things they're
daid meat cuz on the road it's likely they'll shoot poorly and they
never rebound well (ok, almost never).
Indiana has played two non-cupcake Big10 road games and are 0-2.
They have 4 remaining. Indiana played 4 top level nonconference
games and went 2-2.
Looks like my preseason predick was right on, except I didn't realize
how front-loaded the Big10 schedule was with cupcake roadies. They
didn't play a tough host until the 9 game first round was nearly over
and got beach-slapped at State. Now this.
The talk about Indiana being a lock for the #1 seed and the Final Four
should end now. The Hoosiers must solve some problems and
be able to consistently mask their obvious front-line deficiencies.
This will make them a fun team to watch. Not great, but potentially
trouble for anybody if they play virtuoso team basketball, which
they've shown themselves capable of doing.
They're a longshot for the Final Four, but, like Villanova and some
other teams, it cain be done. They'll probably get worse before they
get better. We'll get a good idea of whether they have what it takes
to make the Sweet16 when they visit St. John arena in two weeks.
MrT
|
15.711 | Huh????? | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Feb 13 1992 09:37 | 10 |
| MrT,
Please clarify "St. John" arena. According to my schedule, LOUIEEEE
and the boys have only one out-of-conference game remaining - Notre
Dame on Leap Years Day.
tanks,
Kev
|
15.712 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Feb 13 1992 09:43 | 3 |
| St John srena is Ohio State's gym.
HTH,
Denny
|
15.713 | Wow! Minnesota must be loaded wif' NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS� | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | IWantMySISwimsuitIssue! | Thu Feb 13 1992 09:58 | 1 |
|
|
15.714 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant-Rex) | Thu Feb 13 1992 10:29 | 23 |
| Not really. They have a giant center who plays well at home but
is a disappearing 7-2 redhaid on the road, and big guards. Minny,
who almost beat OSU in St. John Arena, is a deep scrappy squad who
drags better teams down into a low percentage scratch match. They
win ugly, but at 3rd place in the league with their lack of experience
Clem Haskins may be a shoo-in for Big10 CoY.
Both IU and the The U are poor shooting teams. The difference is that
The U is a fairly good rebounding squad. When they took a 17-4 edge
in 2nd half boarding Indiana looked very frustrated, as if they knew
they couldn't miss another shot and win.
On the bright side Calbert is playing a total game, moving without the
ball on O and hustling on D like never before. GGraham also played
well and shot well. The rest of the squad sucked.
Eric Anderson cain't continue shooting 30% from the field. Even if he
resurges, to go to the Excellent8, or even the Sweet16, Indiana needs
Alan Henderson (who looked skinnier than ever last nite, he must be
6-9 185 by now) to blossom and Matt Nover on the bench except to spell
any tired front-liner.
MrT
|
15.715 | Acie earl info wanted | DEMING::MCKAY | | Thu Feb 13 1992 12:00 | 7 |
| Could someone post Acie Earl's stats. I've seen him play and
while I agree with the shot blocked/altered part of his game,
I haven't seen the offensive part of his game. I thought he
looked "awkward" on the offensive end. He definitely has some good
size to him especially his legs.
Jimbo
|
15.716 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Thu Feb 13 1992 14:13 | 12 |
| I'll post them if I ever see them. Acie looks awkward, so awkward
that I predicted he'd never amount to anything. But Acie is one
of the best O players in the conference now. He finally caught
on and moves relentless without the pill. When he gets it inside
he's very hard to stop, you basically just hope he misees his
fadeaway or travels going up for the lay-in. I saw him in person
against Duke at the Sweet16 and he played at par with Laettner. Not
saying he's as good overall as Christian, but he's very good in the
paint and will play C in the NBA. I think he's the Hawkeyes' leading
scorer at around 20 ppg.
MrT
|
15.717 | So thick you cain cut it ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Is that a great new Pepsi can or what? | Thu Feb 13 1992 15:08 | 10 |
| Ooooh, with this latest heart-breaking loss to the Golden Gophers, should
we start "charting the ins and outs" of Bob's chances to go Dancing ???
Maybe it's time to start gnawing on our fingernails or staying up late at
night praying to the Hoop Gods. Will "The General" make it ??? What
will happen if he doesn't ??? And what about Naomi ???
Oh, this Big Ten suspense is just killing me.
Bob Hunt
|
15.718 | | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Feb 13 1992 15:11 | 14 |
| Bob,
How's this??????
Gong, Gong, Gong
;^)
Kev
|
15.719 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Thu Feb 13 1992 15:33 | 10 |
| It's the boredom of the Almost Close conference season that's
rotting your brain WitchHunt. With the remaining schedule last
night's loss purty much wraps things up for OSU. Meanwhile, The
U is slotted for a probable tourney bid.
If this was Almost Close like you are Almost Close, last night's
extravaganza woulda been a mere feeling-out probe experiment session
for the Big Weekend Money-Grubathon.
MrT
|
15.720 | Save me from this incredible tension | SHALOT::HUNT | Is that a great new Pepsi can or what? | Thu Feb 13 1992 16:13 | 14 |
| Oh, that's right, I forgot ... In the Big Ten, we save our real worries
and only do the "Ins And Outs Chart Dance" for the lower-middle tier.
In the Big Ten, we just concede the title to Ohio State now on the 12th of
February and then just play out the rest of the string waiting for the
5:30pm Big Dance Bracket Show on the final Sunday of the regular season.
Wow.
Will Purdue make it ??? (How 'bout Bill Cartwright ???)
And what about the Gophs ??? Oh, I cain't stand it any longer. It's
just too tense.
Bob Hunt
|
15.721 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Thu Feb 13 1992 16:31 | 14 |
| I'm at a loss as to why this hasn't been asked by one of our esteemed
noters earlier, but here goes.
Can the Bob Knight *sheep* please explain how a team can lose a game to
an opponent that they beat by 46 points earlier in the season? I'm
stunned, honestly. Is this some sort of bizzare learning experiment
that the "2nd Lt." is conducting?
I just have a hard time figuring how a coach could allow a 50 point
swing in a months time.
Patiently waiting,
WILDCAT
|
15.722 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Thu Feb 13 1992 16:37 | 13 |
| E-Z: The Hoosiers shot the lights out a the hoop the first time
around. They had the same open mid-range jumpers last nite and
could barely hit one. Also, the game was in Williams Arena, a
loud old barn and perhaps the best home advantage outside of
Albequerque, they had the revenge factor to motivate them, and as
the league's second youngest team have progressed markedly since
IU spanked them in the opener.
Oh, they also had stuff bouncing on the rim three times and dropping
through (fair n' square: shooter's touch) where in the first game
they missed several layups.
MrT
|
15.723 | Ahhhh, revenge is SWEET! | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Thu Feb 13 1992 18:00 | 17 |
| MrT's really in a catch-22 here. He doesn't want to make the Gophs
sound too good. On the other hand he cain't say too many bad things
either, because he'd be doing FatBlob's underachiever's a wrong at the
same time.
Fact is, the 46 point loss in Bloomington was more like a 20-25 point
loss. Clem let it get out of hand to teach the kids a lesson that they
haven't forgotten since. (They've gone 7-3) In the Big10 anyway it's
tough as hell to win on the road. The Gophs beat NW here by 42, then win
there by 2. Gophs are unbeaten at home and may well knock off all the
rest of the home wins against OSU, Iowa, Purdue and Wisconsin.
BTW MrT, we're still waiting for the "spanking" your Loosiers were
going to put on us. :*)
Spud
|
15.724 | WeaselGroupThink (tm) doesn't like these kinds of observations... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 14 1992 09:14 | 9 |
| re: .722
How does this compare with my so_called "The other team was hot and we
weren't" excuse?
Just wonderin' ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.725 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Fri Feb 14 1992 12:09 | 20 |
| re 2
If you'll remember MrT boldly predicted that the Golden Goophs would
make the tourney, and it looks like I'm gonna be right.
>How does this...
This? You mean the hot shooting, which was only one small component
of "this?" Here's how I'll explain it: The hot shooting explained why
a team lost one game. We should all be cautionary about making the
extremely misleading and just plain stupid logic leap that this is in
any way equivalent or comparitive to "explaining" why a talent-laden
squad beat 5 trillion to one odds by running into similar "hot shooting
teams" over a 30 year period.
Oh, I failed to mention one other disappointment in IU's performance
at Williams: They played lousy defense from the guard position, which
has been their most important asset as a team this year.
MrT
|
15.726 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Tue Feb 18 1992 10:52 | 14 |
| Bob has stated that he'll redshirt 7-0 Todd Lindeman next year.
In comments made to a Minneapolis writer at dinner the night before
their game at Williams, Bob said he expected a close game and said
he worried that the Hoosiers "have major holes to exploit." As it
turned out those holes were gaping and fully exploited by the Goophs:
they got dominated on the boards and had a awful outside shooting
game.
Bob commented in '87 to this same writer that he actually thought
that that team could win the Title if it played near perfectly, so
it's not like Bob is a sandbagger.
MrT
|
15.727 | 11 down, 7 to go | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:02 | 11 |
|
Knight said after the Iowa game that Acie Earl was someone everybody
who played Iowa had to worry about, and that "we'll have someone like that in
a couple of years." I assume he was talking about Lindemann, and I hope he's
right.
Indiana just received a verbal commitment for a spring signing from
Malcolm Sims, 6-4 out of Shaker Heights, OH. Guess you can never have too
many guards. :^)
tom
|
15.728 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:18 | 6 |
| Dang Tom,
If'n ya got a plethora of guards, how about shippin them north about
a coupla hundred miles. We sure could use 'em!!
MikeL
|
15.729 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Chicken McShaughnessy? | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:21 | 6 |
| RE: MikeL
He'll trade you a couple of guards for a couple of
NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS�
/Don
|
15.730 | look like a obstacle course | CTHQ2::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:35 | 6 |
| HAHAHA Slash,
Any of our NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS@ are more like NUKEWIDEBODYSTATUES@
HTH
MikeL
|
15.731 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Chicken McShaughnessy? | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:37 | 4 |
| That's okay Mike, BobKnight will turn them into NBA first round
draft picks, and win an NCAA title with them to boot!
/Don
|
15.732 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Tue Feb 18 1992 14:25 | 34 |
| You're damn right, /Roacher - although I sense you might be curling
your ever-flapping lip in sarcasm when you speak this truth.
Another 6-4 guard? That's two 6-4 guards for this year, and I
assume there are no more slots open, maybe one, dunno, would like
to find out.
I just wish Bob would do the BayWhine/Tark thing and unwittingly
send one a his rich Indianapolis alums out to LA checkbook in hand
and write that $100K check and get one a them 6-10 musculated
coordinated aircraft carriers. Sure could use one a them.
Maybe if they have another scholarship it's time to dip into the
juco ranks for a big guy with good grades who could give them a
extra big body to deal with.
Next year Eric's gone, Calbert's small but better, Alan should be
better and hopefully heavier, 6-7 Brian Evans will debut... and
that's it up front. Unless you count Nover.
re: OSU
Randy Ayers announced that ThunderBurp will start in place of 7-footer
Bill Robinson at C against Iowa. Ayers has done a good job, teaching
this haid case a lesson by using him as a substitute and bringing him
to the fore just in time for Iowa and Indiana.
Tonight IU has State at home. People are starting to whisper that
State may be better than even OSU. If the Hoosiers lose at home
tonight they're in a dogfight for 2nd place and a #2 seed in the
tourney - which could damage their chances for a meaningless end-of-
season peak.
MrT
|
15.733 | Can T stay honest ? | LUNER::BROOKS | You down wit MSG ? | Tue Feb 18 1992 15:00 | 5 |
| So T, are you saying that Ayers is doing a better job coaching the
allegedly uncoachable Thunderburke than the sainted "tough lover"
BobFright ?
Doc
|
15.734 | Lousy, lousy source, dude | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Tue Feb 18 1992 17:24 | 10 |
| Re: .726 The Minneapolis "writer"
You have to be referring to Sid "Bobby Knight Could Walk on Water if He
wanted to" Hartmann. What a joke. Haven't you noticed that Sid has
been absolutely wrong about everything he's said in the last year???
Gawd, Sid would probably kiss FatBlob's feet if he was asked to...
Spud
|
15.735 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Wed Feb 19 1992 11:04 | 33 |
| Whaddya talking about. Sid may have guessed wrong on who's gonna
win or what trade's gonna be made, but he in fact broke the story
that Lindemann's going to red-shirt.
re 2
I'm saying nothing of the sort. ThunderBurp was rated among the
top5 players in the nation as a HS junior. He was such a flaming
ani haid case his teammates went to the coach and they threw him
off the team. Burp has been involved with one problem after another
and admitted it when he signed with Bob, stating that he needed the
discipline in order to get straightened out.
Tom Simpson and I both at the time predicted right here in this file
he wouldn't be with the Hoosiers long. He got his discipline. Same
deal. Anus was flaming big-time, the players went to Knight and said
if there was gonna be a different set of rules for him the team would
fall apart and nobody could stand the guy. They wanted him off the
team. So Burp "walked off."
Ayers (who was assisted by Bob in recruiting Burp) agreed totally that
he needed to cool his heels for a year or two and learn that he isn't
all that special.
All I'm saying is that Ayers is doing the same thing with Burp that
Bob woulda done: Teaching a 6-8 225 lb talent with the emotional
maturity of a 6th grader that the team comes first and if he wants to
whine he's welcome to move on.
I think Burp, no Einstein, is catching on. We cain thank Bob for that.
Altruism, tough love, at its best!
MrT
|
15.736 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 11:54 | 9 |
| So, if he was such a "haid" case, why did Bob Knight lower his "lofty"
standards and recruit him in the first place? Waiting...
Let's see you back up your statement with some documented proof that
the players went and complained to Knight about Lawerence. Waiting...
Patiently waiting...
WILDCAT
|
15.737 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Wed Feb 19 1992 12:25 | 18 |
| The team meeting has been well documented, talked about in any number
a sports rags and on ESPN. Lookit up joeself.
It's not "if" Burpmeister was (is?) a haid case, the Burper admitted
to it himself. The extraordinary actions of his HS coach prove the
same, and ditto for his HS teammates. You deny that he got thrown
off his HS squad despite being a top5 prepster as a junior? Again,
lookit up joeself.
Also acknowledging that he's a haid case is Randy Ayers. Not to
mention Dick Vitale, and 43,281 others by my count.
Bob didn't recruit Burper, Burpoid recruited Bob. Bob laid out the
program and said he'd have to change cuz the program wasn't gonna
change for him. Burp agreed, changed his mind, got called out for
it by his teammates, and left.
MrT
|
15.738 | How did you arrive at the 43,281 figure? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCanseco | Wed Feb 19 1992 12:33 | 1 |
|
|
15.739 | One day Hawkeye fan | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Feb 19 1992 12:38 | 12 |
|
Michigan State at Indiana tonight. A Hoosier win would set up a
nice Sunday afternoon of basketball this weekend. Hard to imagine how Jim
Jackson could get held to 7 points by anyone.
re. 736
What are these ""lofty" standards"? Is this just a response to comments
from T, or do you actually believe this?
tom
|
15.740 | UCONN would bury Iowa | DEMING::MCKAY | | Wed Feb 19 1992 12:41 | 3 |
| 43,281 is a very conservative estimate.
Jimbo
|
15.741 | | LUNER::BROOKS | You down wit MSG ? | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:25 | 8 |
| Yo Roper, I'm waiting for T to come up with an excuse for why Bob would
let his *players* make personnel decisions !
Cain you see the players saying, "He goes or we go ?" to *Bob* ?
Yeah right T !
Doc
|
15.742 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:56 | 10 |
| re MrT - Never questioned the fact he was thrown off of his HS team
second semester senior season. Questioned why Bob recruited him in the
first place. Furthermore, Lawrence did *NOT* recruit IU! Ha, what a
joke.
re Tom - I mentioned "lofty" standards because we've been led to
believe from MrT that Bob won't recruit anyone that's not on their way
to Rhodes Scholardom ala Alan Henderson!
WILDCAT
|
15.743 | MrT is losing grip on sanity. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:57 | 13 |
| > Bob didn't recruit [Funderburke], [Funderburke] recruited him.
Haw haw! How quickly we forget the charges levied against Indiana
recruiters for making an illegal contact with none other than Top5
Lawrence Funderburke. Whether the contacts were illegal or not is open
to question, but you must be outa your cottin_pickin mind if you think
one of the Top 5 HS players in the USA is gonna attend a University that
didn't even recruit him.
Thanks for the laugh though!
- ACC Chris
|
15.744 | Knight should have gained the upper hand by letting go | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:58 | 18 |
|
Everyone's missing the major point on the Funderburke situation.
Bob Knight giving the kid a chance and recruiting him was not the
problem. Bob Knight giving him the boot after the kid screwed up was
not the problem. The only problem was that Knight should have cleared
Funderburke to go out and do whatever it was he wanted to do with his
life (including play basketball with someone else), but Knight held him
to his Indiana commitment. I'm a pseudo-Knight admirer, but I think
giving the kid your best advice and then completely divorcing yourself
of him if he doesn't want that advice would be the *right* thing to do,
regardless of the self-serving NCAA regs that make it legal (it
certainly would have completely erased any doubts about who was at
fault-- because it was Funderburke who was at fault). Instead, Bob
Knight did appear to act out of revenge or in the best interests of
Indiana basketball.
glenn
|
15.745 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 13:58 | 5 |
| RE DOC - Great point! Who is running the ship at IU? Has Bob lost
touch? One would think the inmates may be running the asylum after the
50 point turn-around to Minnesota!
WILDCAT
|
15.746 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:01 | 8 |
| I feel like we need to clear up a misconception that 'T has spread
about Sir Lawrence of Funderburke. Bob Knight DID NOT kick 'burke off
the team. Lawrence told him and IU to take a hike, and left of his own
free will. Knight wanted him to return to the team.
HTH's
WILDCAT
|
15.747 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | HomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCanseco | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:07 | 4 |
| If you guys are waiting for MorT to get some facks you better
make plenty of coffee.
/Don
|
15.748 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:11 | 22 |
| T,
Just ignore Wildcat...
Remember that he is a fan of one of the most corrupt, undisciplined
and underachieving programs in the history of college basketball.
They had no morals, no discipline and no 'lofty' standards....
From Rupp to Joe B. Hall to Eddie Sutton.....
I think he might be a tad bit envious and very jealous....
And T, as to Doc Midnite, when was the last time he put something with
substance in this notesfile.....
Finally as to ACChris, he has such faith in his program that he is
constantly predicting 'potential losses' to vastly inferior teams,
dreaming up excuses for embarrassing losses and being blinded by his
professed love for his idol.
What a trio of basketball analysts.... NOT!
|
15.749 | Dean Smith = Guy Lewis + Freddy Brown | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:14 | 0 |
15.750 | As a defender of personal freedoms I'm sure MrT agrees... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:15 | 17 |
|
> I feel like we need to clear up a misconception that 'T has spread
> about Sir Lawrence of Funderburke. Bob Knight DID NOT kick 'burke off
> the team. Lawrence told him and IU to take a hike, and left of his own
> free will. Knight wanted him to return to the team.
Whatever. It's almost semantical. At some point they reached an
understanding that Funderburke would not be playing basketball ever
again at Indiana. My main point still stands. Knight should have
decided to be the better man and let Lawrence play his act somewhere
else if that's what he really wanted. That would have been completely
consistent with Bob Knight's philosophy of only wanting players around
who want to be there and not stooping to NCAA-sponsored gamesmanship in
the competition for players. I think he mishandled this one.
glenn
|
15.751 | Bob on the ropes, so Cap starts the personal attacks ... | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:34 | 9 |
| re: Cap
Nice Objective Commentary there bub. Really addresses the issues at
hand ...
:^(
- ACC Chris
|
15.752 | Where's the personal attack??? | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:47 | 1 |
|
|
15.753 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Feb 19 1992 14:50 | 6 |
| Also there is no issue here.... only a new person trying to dredge up
an old arguement...
It doesn't bother me about the Funderburke situation, in my eyes it's
no different than the Rozier situation(where Smith drove him away
and he was illegally contacted by another school).
|
15.754 | Thypocrisy (tm) makes me sick. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:31 | 8 |
| > Also there is no issue here.... only a new person trying to
> dredge up an old arguement
Kinda reminds me of a couple_a noters who continuously bring up certain
questions about a certain coach, don't it?
- ACC Chris
|
15.755 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:53 | 20 |
| RE .748
Unbelievable babble! Cap, you've obviously obtained you're writing
style from reading too many articles from liberal, set agenda minded
reporters!
UK underachievers??? - NOT!!! I've been fairly reluctant to bring up
UK's past successes in the tourney, records set, etc. If that's what
it takes however, so be it! UK more than holds its own with any school
in the country in regards to basketball tradition.
Please tell also what you've personally got on Rupp, Hall, and
Sutton that the NCAA never had? More garbage you've read from the
National Enquirer no doubt!
And now back to our regularly scheduled nonsense,
:-)
WILDCAT
|
15.756 | Out | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Wed Feb 19 1992 15:57 | 8 |
| Ok, all of you, get out of here. Clear the room. Leave this note.
You come in here barking like dogs yip yip yip dredging up old bones
that nobody's interested pinching loaves seeking only to make trouble.
You're welcome to come back to 15 when you're ready to talk substantively
about Big10 hoops.
MrT
|
15.757 | *U* git out, until you clean up your act. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:09 | 6 |
| Git out yourself MorT, at least until you apologize for your ridiculous
assertion that one of the Top5 players in the USA would attend a
university that didn't even recruit him.
- ACC Chris
|
15.758 | Out Crockmeister. OUT. | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:26 | 1 |
|
|
15.759 | Kentucky's cheating is a matter of official NCAA record... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:27 | 19 |
|
> Please tell also what you've personally got on Rupp, Hall, and
> Sutton that the NCAA never had? More garbage you've read from the
> National Enquirer no doubt!
Is this a joke? In addition to being a white supremacist who had to be
dragged kicking and screaming into the 20th century (and finally into
retirement), Rupp was cold-busted in the early 1950s by the NCAA and his
team effectively given a one-year death penalty (allowed to play only
in exhibitions) after widespread recruiting violations were uncovered
during an NCAA game-fixing investigation that involved Kentucky. Sutton
was fortunate to avoid the death penalty after a second strike against
Kentucky (a fact that was acknowledged by the university administration).
Forget about the National Enquirer, do they have someone in Kentucky go
through the history books Soviet-style, erasing all references to these
violations and NCAA-enforced probations?
glenn
|
15.760 | Rope's on the ropes. Haa. You cain stay Glenn! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:29 | 1 |
|
|
15.761 | Just for the fun of it... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:31 | 5 |
| re .755
Maybe he got it from conservative, set-agenda journalists.
JD
|
15.762 | Still waiting ... | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:40 | 7 |
| re: MrT
You gonna explain to us how Funderburke went to IU unrecruited MorT, or
am I gonna haveta pester you into submission?
- ACC Chris
|
15.763 | Still a fan of the wandering one, btw | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:47 | 18 |
| Glenn,
As an IU fan, I was also uncomfortable with Knight not letting
Funderburke go out and sign up with whoever wanted him. It didn't "feel"
right to me, and I'm sure as I can be that this sort of thing hurts Indiana
in the recruiting wars.
I've heard two explanations for why Knight wouldn't let Funderburke
go. One is, as you've said, that Knight was being vindictive. The other is
that Knight has gotten tired of 18-year-olds that feel like they don't need
to live up to their commitments, and want to run away when things don't go
their way.
I have no idea which, if either, is accurate, or if some combination of both
is close to the truth. As far as I know, Knight's never made any public
comments on the specifics of that situation.
tom
|
15.764 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 19 1992 16:50 | 12 |
|
> You gonna explain to us how Funderburke went to IU unrecruited MorT, or
> am I gonna haveta pester you into submission?
Who cares? Like I said, it's a total non-issue. Unless, of course,
you believe that it's wrong to give a kid who meets the academic
entrance requirements a chance because he's got an "attitude" tag. It
didn't work out and I didn't like the way Knight handled it on the way
out, but that's irrelevant to the kid's recruitment...
glenn
|
15.765 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:21 | 19 |
|
Wildcat,
As Glenn so eloquently wrote, Rupp was considered one of the original
slime in college basketball and Kentucky during his era was one of
the most corrupt in the history of intercollegiate sports. Maybe you
need to do some historical reading in order to widen your scope on
the history of Wildcat basketball. Send me mail and I can suggest some
books for you....
And you don't want to get me started on the corruption evident in
Eddie Sutton's tenure. It's sad that you don't recognize these
evident defenciencies in Kentucky's past.....
Plus if Kentucky didn't underachieve than please explain why Joe B.
Hall got the moniker, "Joe B. Hall - The Dean Smith of the 70's".
Cap
|
15.766 | B-Ball History 101 | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:23 | 71 |
| Whoa Nellie! Here we go again. As long as we deal with specifics and
not generalize, I guess I can live with it.
re 15.759
glenn, you are quite correct that Kentucky's infractions are part of
official NCAA record. You'll not find one single reference anywhere
that I've stated anything to the contrary. I stand by my original
statement. The NCAA found no wrong doing on the parts of Adolph Rupp,
Joe Hall, and Eddie Sutton. That's NONE. Believe me, they tried their
collective best in doing so. UK's past problems were caused by over
zealous idiots (boosters) who believed they were above the law since
they were rick, etc. A lack of institutional control was also a major
factor. By that I mean prior administrations had a bad habit of
allowing boosters in the locker room prior to and after games. That
bad habit has been taken care of!
Now, a couple of nits with your comments.
>> Is this a joke? In addition to being a white supremacist who had to be
>> dragged kicking and screaming into the 20th century (and finally into
>> retirement), Rupp was cold-busted in the early 1950s by the NCAA and his
>> team effectively given a one-year death penalty (allowed to play only
>> in exhibitions) after widespread recruiting violations were uncovered
>> during an NCAA game-fixing investigation that involved Kentucky.
Where do you get this white supremacist garbage? From reading one too
many Sports Illustrated articles? Give me a break! Perhaps an SEC
history lesson is in store? I'll wait while you come up with some sort
of justification for calling Adolph Rupp a "white supremacist".
Secondly, Rupp wasn't "cold-busted" by anyone. Three players on the
team were found guilty of associating with a New York City gambler and
fixing games. No, repeat no recruting violations! Adolph Rupp was
totally exonerated by the NCAA. Anyone who knows the kind of coach
Rupp was knew that he'd never fix a game! The man hated to lose.
Perhaps that's why he's the winningest coach in the history of college
basketball.
>> Sutton was fortunate to avoid the death penalty after a second strike
>> against Kentucky (a fact that was acknowledged by the university
>> administration).
Sutton avoided nothing. The University avoided the death penalty.
Sutton wasn't sober enough at the time to realize the shape the program
was getting into! That point by the way is documented. David Rosell,
who was UK's President at the time, sold the University up the river.
He was on record as stating that he didn't like basketball to begin
with. UK could've and should've fought many of the charges levied
against them in 1987. They obviously did some things that were wrong.
Not denying that. It wasn't nearly as "EVIL" as the press would have
you believe.
The NCAA had a Vendetta against UK in 1987. You see they spent many
months and dollars trying to nail them in 1985, but left Lexington
red-faced and empty handed. The investigation in 1987 dragged on for
well over a year! Recruiting was crippled for two seasons before any
penalty was ever handed down. Never before has the NCAA gone after a
school the way they hounded UK. Those are facts, not some UK fan
spewing forth propaganda. UK bent over backwards by cleaning house.
Firing the Athletic Director, forcing Sutton to quit, etc. Never
before has a school cleaned house this way. Did the NCAA cut them any
slack for admitting trangressions and cleaning house? - NOT!
It's funny to see how the NCAA deals with other programs with a
limp-wrist!
Class dismissed,
WILDCAT
|
15.767 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:24 | 8 |
| re -1
Should read -
Over zealous idiots (booster) who felt they were above the law because
they were RICH not "rick"
WILDCAT
|
15.768 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Time for some ROCK and roll! | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:28 | 7 |
| .766� It's funny to see how the NCAA deals with other programs with a
.766� limp-wrist!
You mean like Indiana? Those guys are so terrified of
Grease-Knightling, they just say.."Please don't do that again!"
B.A.
|
15.769 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:31 | 9 |
| CAP, see re -2 for my reply concerning Rupp, Sutton, etc. Thanks for
the offer on the books, but I've read my fair share. As a matter of
course I tend to form my own thoughts after reading said books and
commentary. It's too easy to be a "SHEEP" and blindly accept
everything that John Feinstein, Frank Deford, and others write.
HTH's
WILDCAT
|
15.770 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:36 | 20 |
| >> And you don't want to get me started on the corruption evident in
>> Eddie Sutton's tenure. It's sad that you don't recognize these
>> evident defenciencies in Kentucky's past.....
>> Plus if Kentucky didn't underachieve than please explain why Joe B.
>> Hall got the moniker, "Joe B. Hall - The Dean Smith of the 70's".
CAP, perhaps you should re-read some of my prior notes over in 207
concerning defenciencies in Kentucky's past. I think you'll find that
I've never denied said defenciencies!
Also, please explain the bit about Joe being the "Dean Smith of the
70's". Quit while you're ahead, you'll get bloody on this one. I've
followed UK since 1972 and never heard that one. If you'd like, I'll
point you to the era in which some thought Joe underachieved. Hint:
It was'nt in the 70's!
HTH's
WILDCAT
|
15.771 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:44 | 15 |
| Wildcat -
So who did you read? Were you a SHEEP in believing all you read?
Sounds like it to me.
The richest moment in NCAA history was when all-black Texas Western
beat Rupp and Kentucky for the NCAA title. Old Rudolph was a might
mad then.
Rupp was merely an icon for his times - a time which saw less racial
equality then now - and outward bigotry was more accepted - especially
in the south and border states.
HTH.
JD
|
15.772 | Wow, that really was one heck of a piece of propaganda... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:46 | 16 |
|
Wildcat,
I'll provide the sources for my contentions later, but first to the
point. Is it your honest assertion that while all the garbage was
going on around Rupp and Sutton, they were in no way complicit? That
they had absolutely no knowledge? That they were, in fact, both
completely innocent of the charges? Let's not hide behind the politics
of the NCAA and what they did or didn't say about the coaches in their
official reports (i.e. by sanitizing the charges with respect to the
coaches with the old "institutional control" catch-all tag). I want to
hear it straight: do you honestly believe these two coaches had nothing
to do with what was going on?
glenn
|
15.773 | Still Standing :-) | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:48 | 12 |
| Sheesh, this must be why Knight has such a rotten reputation. So many
people tend to read only the negative comments and either don't see or
overlook the positive. As MrT will attest, Knight has done plenty of
positive things over the years that many will never hear about.
Repeat after me, many writers have their own personal agendas, and will
stop at nothing to defame individuals, etc. In other words, DON'T
BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ!
Steadfast and True,
WILDCAT
|
15.774 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Wed Feb 19 1992 17:55 | 19 |
| Wildcat -
No kidding about the writers. You just think that up? And I hope YOU
listen to yourself - and don't just believe what you WANT to believe -
but get the information from as many sources as you can. It's easy to
read something, not agree with it, and shake it off as "The writer has
a secret agenda and is out to get my hero..." That's easy, real easy.
I'd venture a guess that hte vast majority of writers out there don't
have agendas against people - but they report what the
worshippers/fans/etc of people DON'T WANT TO HEAR. One of the easiest
cop outs of all time is to blame the media.
And yes, Bobby Knight has done many positive things. And I've read
about many of them. They are reported on. But folks who don't like
Knight only remember the bad incidents. It's the reader's perception
in most cases, not the writer's words.
JD
|
15.775 | Honest Question - Honest Answer | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 18:08 | 27 |
| re .771
JD, I'd like to comment, but I honestly find nothing there but
subjective ramblings. No thanks.
re .772
glenn, I think if you'll re-read my entry you'll find that it's fairly
objective and not a "piece of propaganda". My intentions were for it
not to be propaganda in any event.
Since you asked, I'll try and answer your question's honestly. I
wasn't even a glimmer in my parents eye when Rupp's Cats were nailed.
But my gut feeling is that Rupp was innocent of any wrong doing. The
man wanted to win too badly to have ever been caught up in a
point-shaving scandal. BTW, the NCAA agreed. As far as Sutton goes,
I've gone on record earlier stating my disapproval of the way he
handled the basketball program. I believe however that he did not have
a hand in the wrong doing, but knew something was amiss. It's fairly
well documented that Eddie Sutton was suffering from alcoholism while
at UK. This undoubtedly clouded the mans judgement. I guess what I'm
saying is that Sutton may not have done anything himself, but I believe
he had knowledge of wrong doing.
BTW, where does Joe Hall fit into all of this?
WILDCAT
|
15.776 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 18:17 | 16 |
| JD, I understand your point about reading/believing what you want to
believe, etc. It's a given however that writers tend to be
vindictive, etc.
Understand that since I live 2 1/2 hours from Lexington, and have
lived in this area my entire life that I understand a little more than
a person who doesn't live in this area about the goings on at UK, IU,
OSU, etc. People from other parts of the country get the news from
National columnists. We get it all here, both good and bad! All I've
tried to bring forth is that the "Nation" didn't get the entire story
about what happened in Lexington 5 years ago. If you think you did,
then you're blind. :-)
Still going and going and going (until dinner time that is!)
WILDCAT
|
15.777 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Wed Feb 19 1992 18:30 | 8 |
| WILDCAT -
I'd just like you to prove your statement that it's "a given however
that writers tend to be vindictive, etc."
All writers? Or just those that write stuff you don't believe in.
JD
|
15.778 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Wed Feb 19 1992 20:38 | 6 |
| JD, the only writers that are vindictive are those that write stuff I
don't believe in.
This should clear up any and all confusion.
WILDCAT
|
15.779 | 12 down, 6 to go, and they need to win 5 | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Feb 19 1992 23:19 | 28 |
|
Thought about entering this in the Southeastern Conference note,
but...
Good win for Indiana over Michigan State tonight. Amazing how much
difference it makes where and when you play somebody. Three weeks
ago Indiana went to East Lansing undefeated in the conference, and
got blown out by a Spartan team that had just given a game to
Michigan. This time, the Hoosiers were all over them from the opening
tap and it was no contest, 103-73. Indiana led 55-26 at the half,
with Cheaney and Anderson held to a combined 7 points. Graham had
18 in the half, Bailey had 15, and Henderson played an awesome game
at both ends of the floor.
Only downside for the Hoosiers was Matt Nover, who got quick fouls,
kept playing the wrong defense, and insisted (unsuccessfully) on
trying to score over Peplowski.
The most amazing player in the conference has to be Matt Steigenga.
He had 2 points tonight. He's been interspersing 1 good game with
3 or 4 bad ones for 4 years now, and I just can't figure it out.
He's quick, he's pretty athletic, and he's a pretty good shooter; but
more often than not you'd swear he's not even in the game. Go
figure.
Next up: Sunday at Ohio State for the conference lead.
tom
|
15.780 | "remember I don't know a thing"
| CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Thu Feb 20 1992 08:51 | 10 |
|
While I'll agree with you Wildcat on Rupp not being in on the fixes, why do
you not address the illegal recruiting violations? Surely a man that wanted
to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above bending the rules?
How can you say Sutton knew nothing when his son sat there aside of Eric
Manuel during his second SAT testing? I also seriously doubt Casey acted
on his own. Sort like Regan and Iran if you get my drift...
mike
|
15.781 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 20 1992 09:30 | 27 |
| Kentucky excuse #1
Coach was drunk so could not be blamed for infractions committed by
his program.
Re: Sheep
Wildcat,
Maybe you should take a long look in the mirror and see if your fleece
is 'white as snow'. You've only been in this file a very short time
and have not seen me criticize Knight(which I've done on many of an
occastion). You seem to take on the Sheep moniker by blindly believing
that there was no wrong done and making up feeble excuses for some of
the worst transgressions committed in college basketball.
Re: Joe B. Hall
Make sure you have all your facts down before stepping over this line.
My opinion as well as many of Kentucky's fans is that Hall greatly
underachieved with the amount of talent that he possessed at Kentucky.
If you can argue with opinion than so be it, but I'm sure glad to see
that the comment rattled you so......:-)
It's amazing how quickly one can change the subject....:-)
Cap
|
15.782 | | LUNER::BROOKS | You down wit MSG ? | Thu Feb 20 1992 09:36 | 13 |
| T, while Glenn is right about the racist-white-supremecist Rupp, and
the sleziod scum Sutton (I've hated him from his Arkansas days), you
STEEL haven't come clean with the ThunderBump case.
Don't try to divert the discussion ....
And CapMeister, my sterling rep as an honest, objective noter of
substance is safe, and will not be challanged by your Hoosier
Propaganda ....
The truth must win out !
Doc
|
15.783 | As promised, a Kentucky basketball primer... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 20 1992 10:30 | 132 |
|
Wildcat, I dug up my sources (yes, Sports Illustrated) and found that the
factual record is indeed in violent opposition to your version of events
at Kentucky. Considering your feelings on the motives of these writers,
feel free to ignore what you feel to be biased, opinionated material and
concentrate on refuting the *facts* (NCAA reports on violations, first-
hand testimony, etc.).
> Where do you get this white supremacist garbage? From reading one too
> many Sports Illustrated articles? Give me a break! Perhaps an SEC
> history lesson is in store? I'll wait while you come up with some sort
> of justification for calling Adolph Rupp a "white supremacist".
I am well aware of the history of the SEC with regards to integration.
However, just as in all parts of the country, there were those who spoke
out against segregation, there were those who kept their mouths shut
regardless of how they felt, and there were those with racist motivations
who fought it tooth-and-nail, well past the time of change. Rupp was
indisputably in the latter category. As a matter of fact, Kentucky was in
a position to *promote* change, because unlike with Mississippi and
Alabama, the state government and university administration was pushing
for integration of the athletic programs (integration of the school had
long since occurred and the football team was integrated three years
before the basketball team, but Rupp still remained a straggler even by
SEC standards). Rupp just wouldn't budge:
[from SI, April 1, 1991]
A couple of years earlier [than 1966, when Kentucky met Texas
Western in the famous championship game] Rupp, under pressure from
Kentucky president John Oswald to recruit minority players, had
attained much publicity while recruiting a black center named
Westley Unseld, who instead chose his hometown school, Louisville.
Years later Unseld would tell friends that Rupp made a single
visit to his house, during which Rupp made it plain to Unseld's
parents-- Westley wasn't even home-- that he didn't want to be
there. In a 1979 book entitled _Adolph_Rupp_as_I_Knew_Him_, the
Baron's longtime assistant, Harry Lancaster, revealed his boss's
recruiting agenda more fully. Returning to his office after yet
another meeting with Oswald, Rupp told Lancaster, "Harry, that
sonofabith is ordering me to get some niggers in here. What am I
going to do?"
That was Rupp's trusted assistant of 20+ years that wrote that! Another
traitor?
In a newspaper interview after his retirement, Rupp had more to say about
the impact of that game:
In a 1975 interview with the Louisville Courier-Journal,
Rupp said that his "all-time favorite team" had lost the '66 NCAA
final to a "bunch of crooks". He revealed a pathological side
of his sorrow. He said that his biggest career disappointment was
"not winning in '66 and finding out that Texas Western had all
those ineligible players... one was on parole from Tennessee State
Prison. Two had been kicked out of junior college in Iowa. Texas
Western was suspended by the NCAA for three years after that".
In fact, all of Texas Western's players were academically eligible and no
such NCAA suspension or probation ever occurred.
> Secondly, Rupp wasn't "cold-busted" by anyone. Three players on the
> team were found guilty of associating with a New York City gambler and
> fixing games. No, repeat no recruting violations! Adolph Rupp was
> totally exonerated by the NCAA. Anyone who knows the kind of coach
> Rupp was knew that he'd never fix a game! The man hated to lose.
> Perhaps that's why he's the winningest coach in the history of college
> basketball.
Again, these are not the facts (NCAA violations and punishments do not
cover activities like game-fixing or other crimes that are unknowingly
committed outside and independent of the athletic program):
[from SI, May 29, 1989]
Cheating is nothing new to the pages of Kentucky's basketball
scrapbook. Adolph Rupp's 1952-53 team was nailed with what
amounted to the NCAA's first death penalty-- the Wildcats had to
sit out the winter playing intrasquad exhibitions-- because of
payments to players, which came to light during an investigation
into a point-shaving scandal involving several Wildcat players.
Joe B. Hall, you ask?:
[In 1976], the NCAA announced that the Wildcats' scholarships
would be limited for two seasons because of recruiting violations.
Still, Hall gave the fat Cats boosters among the horsemen and
coal-mine operators in the commonwealth access to practices and
the locker room, even at halftime of games.
On the latest go-round...
> David Rosell,
> who was UK's President at the time, sold the University up the river.
> He was on record as stating that he didn't like basketball to begin
> with. UK could've and should've fought many of the charges levied
> against them in 1987.
Again, your version of events. The NCAA had a completely different view
of Roselle:
If anyone can bring the Kentucky program under control, the
soft-spoken Roselle, a Duke Ph.D. who rooted for Blue Devils Art
Heyman and Jeff Mullins in the mid-1960s, can. Last week the NCAA
went out of its way to praise him for what amounted to a textbook
investigation [note: the NCAA also explicitly stated in their
report that Kentucky's violations were sufficient to warrant the
death penalty and Roselle's cooperation was cited as the
difference]. Indeed, Roselle has emerged as a leader of the new
breed of university presidents who are trying to keep big-time
sports from compromising their schools' academic standings.
Bad as the situation in Lexington may be, it could have been worse.
Still, the call-in shows are humming with vilifications of Roselle
for giving in, rather than with hosannas for having saved
basketball from imminent demise. In January, Roselle said
privately that he was taking the biggest gamble any Kentucky
president could imagine by cooperating with the NCAA. "If I
fail," he said, "no future president will have a chance to do
things right."
Instead, thanks to Roselle, the Wildcats have another
chance to do things right. One final chance.
By the way, guess who was the person responsible for bringing in C.M.
Newton (the man most responsible for large-scale integration of the SEC,
while at Alabama) as athletic director-- with friend Bob Knight's
recommendation, and for convincing Rick Pitino to come to
Kentucky? Yup, Roselle.
glenn
|
15.784 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Thu Feb 20 1992 10:59 | 11 |
| Glenn -
Whatsamatta wif you? Sports Illustrated. All of them writers there
got vindications against poo' ol' Kaintuck. they all have hidden
agendas. You should read the local Kaintuck papers - they know better.
Just like the local Las Vegas papers know ol Jerry Tark ain't done
nothing wrong - just them gosh darn vindicitive secret agenda media
folks who ruin it for that perfect gentlemain.
JD
|
15.785 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 20 1992 11:39 | 14 |
|
7,8,9,10.....
And Wildcat still hasn't risen from one of the most viscious beatings
that has ever been suffered in this notesfile.... :-)
Wildcat, bit of advice for you, don't ever challenge Glenn when he
makes a statement because I assure you that he has all of his facts
together before writing a note on a potentially controversial subject.
Ouch....
|
15.786 | Far more hilarious ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:06 | 10 |
| re: .-1
I wouldn't talk Cap. Less than one (1) day after your unbelievable
claim that Bob hasn't had a 'T' since 1987 MChilds reports he got one
*** LAST NIGHT ***!!!
Haw haw!!11
- ACC Chris
|
15.787 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 20 1992 13:07 | 4 |
| My sides are splitting....
Oh well, still would be willing to bet that Dean has had more. Would
you like to wager????
|
15.788 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Jihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus) | Thu Feb 20 1992 14:24 | 11 |
| >You mean like Indiana? Those guys are so terrified of bla-aaah !!
Bob has never been accused of anything. There were rumors a asst.
phoned a recruit a few years ago, and that about sums it up. Mebbe
you're thinking about the time Bob wrote a check of $80K for his
(last) nukewidebody Landon Turner, but that was after he was paralyzed
and so probably didn't concern the NCAA.
HTH,
MrT
|
15.789 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:08 | 12 |
|
Yeah but Bobby's T last night I'll venture to quess (considering the score)
was a Red Auerbachiane style T, that's sole purpose was to send a message to
his team that no matter how bad the score, it ain't over till it's over. He's
in the game for the duration and they dam well better be too...
Snuff's was as whinny and stupid as they come considering that his team had
just cut the lead to 5 just a few minutes earlier only to see lead mushroom
back up to 10, his own player just caught one so four shots and the ball.
dumb dumb dumb dumb.......
mike
|
15.790 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:22 | 64 |
| RE 15.780
>> While I'll agree with you Wildcat on Rupp not being in on the fixes,
>> why do you not address the illegal recruiting violations? Surely a
>> man that wanted to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above
>> bending the rules?
>> How can you say Sutton knew nothing when his son sat there aside of
>> of Eric Manuel during his second SAT testing? I also seriously
>> doubt Casey acted on his own. Sort like Regan and Iran if you get
>> my drift ...
Mike, why don't I address illegal recruiting violations? Simply
because I wasn't asked my opinion on them. Be glad to share them with
you however. First of all I have a problem with the statment "surely a
man that wanted to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above
bending the rules?".
Come on now Mike, neither you, myself, or anyone truly know what's
inside the heart of another man. I have know idea how Rupp's great
desire to win affected his decisions. I know that I also have a great
desire to win at anything I undertake but that desire is tempered by a
desire to be a man of integrity. Now, my opinion on that is another
matter. I just take major offense when we jump all over a person when
we don't know all that went on.
Was Adolph Rupp as pure as the driven snow? Extremely doubtful. Was
he any worse then any other big-time collegiate coach? Don't know the
answer to that one. Perhaps, perhaps not. I've never, NEVER said Rupp
was without blemishes. I do however get a hearty laugh whenever I see
someone read one man's opinion in an SI article and take that as the
absolute truth. I'm not defending Rupp here, I'm talking about
gathering ALL the facts and coming to some sort of intelligent
decision. A certain noter has made reference to me living in a cave
buried to my neck with Lexington Herald Leaders! Couldn't be further
from the truth. All I'm saying is that I and others who live in this
area (Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky) have much more information on the
goings on at the University of Kentucky then people in other parts of
the country. Just as people on the East Coast have much more
information on St. Johns, U Conn, and North Carolina then I.
Now, on to our man Eddie Sutton. If you'll take a minute and read some
of my past notes on Sutton in the SEC topic, etc. You'll find that
I've never defended the actions of him. I have mentioned his
alcoholism. I've never said that this was an excuse for him to be
totally exonerated from wrong doing. I belive Sutton was in charge of
the program along with Cliff Hagan, program went bad, and that he
should take the burden of responsibility. No less, no more.
BTW, Mike, Sean Sutton DID NOT sit next to Eric at the SAT's. That was
the original story from the media. Sutton gave Manuel a ride to the
test, and if you'd like I'll dig up the NCAA's transcript on this.
Just a small nit, but shows that it's hard to believe everything you
read.
CAP and glenn. You're next! I'm still standing and gathering steam.
glenn, I do appreciate you quoting sources, particulary Harry
Lancaster. I do believe you're being objective. We may just be
arguing semantics. I'll return the favor with some quotes this
evening. CAP on the other hand, it appears you're just hanging on in
this little discussion to try and rattle some cages with inane
commentary. Try harder. :-)
WILDCAT
|
15.791 | Underutilized perhaps. But only cause Salvadori is so good ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:37 | 16 |
| re: MChilds
Yea except for the fact that, as someone else mentioned, Carolina
started getting *lots* of calls go their way from that point forward.
The lead was down to 5 again and the game within reach. Unfortunately
at that point ESPN decided it was in the viewers best interest to go
watch timeouts. :^(
re: Ross
Ah yes, Carolina loses so it's time for the obligatory Carolina/Montross
sip note. ***YAWN***.
- ACC Chris
|
15.792 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates! | Thu Feb 20 1992 15:48 | 4 |
| I'd rather watch timeouts than a Dean induced foul-a-thon. Why caint
these guys take a loss like a main instead of turning 5 minutes into
15!!?
Denny
|
15.793 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 20 1992 16:08 | 47 |
| >CAP on the other hand, it appears you're just hanging on in
>this little discussion to try and rattle some cages with inane
>commentary. Try harder. :-)
I'd say for the amount of effort that I put into this it was incredibly
effective. Let's look at the scenario:
1: Wildcat is attacking B. Knight over a non-issue dealing with
L. Funderburke.
2: Cap enters a small statement saying to ignore Wildcat because
he is simply in awe of the IU program due to the corruption
that has occured at Wildcat's favorite program.
3: Wildcat launches into a diatribe about how is program is
misunderstood and misinterpreted. An embarrassing note filled
with denials and excuses.
4: Glenn than whomps Wildcat upside the 'haidbone with pure facts
that leave Wildcat shaken, bloodied and confused....
5: Cap sits back, laughs and wonders what happened to the Bobby
Knight discussion(Although this Kentucky one is a good one).
You see Wildcat you can say anything you want about Knight, because it
doesn't bother me in the least bit. I understand his faults, have
commented on how embarrassed I've been by certain actions in the past
associated with Knight and understand that he has made mistakes(both
personally and coaching mistakes). So you are allowed to have your
opinion and won't get a rise out of me if you criticize Knight(and I
might agree with you on occasion). Personally I feel that Knight
should have let Funderburke out of his committment but since I don't
know the reasons why Knight did this than I am comfortable with his
decision to do so as he could have had a very valid reason for doing
this.....
A suggestion is that you should join us and focus some of your
basketball energy towards analyzing why Dean Smith is the biggest
underachiever in the history of college basketball. It's highly
enjoyable and reaps great benefits as it's easy to score decisive
victories over a certain pro-Dean Smith noter.
However you do need to face up to the fact that Kentucky has had
one of the most corrupt programs in the history of college basketball.
They made a very good move, getting C.M. Newton and Pitino and
hopefully will run a clean program in the future(I enjoy watching a
Pitino coached team and think Rick is one of the better young coaches
in the game) but you can't ignore nor really defend their past as it
is full of transgressions and violations.
Cap
|
15.794 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Thu Feb 20 1992 16:14 | 10 |
|
I'm the one who stated UNC got alot of calls after the T's Chris. Which in
a way I'd admit on the surface makes Dean's tirade look a smart move cause
he finally got what he'd been begging for all night, all season etc, all the
calls but my problem is that it wasn't caculated he's been carrying on like
this for how many years? With his talent, his supposed superior intellect of
the game etc., does he really need all the calls too? Is he that insecure?
Untrusting of the system?
mike
|
15.795 | Amazing. Simply, amazing. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 20 1992 17:03 | 15 |
| > Personally I feel that Knight should have let Funderburke out of
> his committment but since I don't know the reasons why Knight did
> this than I am comfortable with his decision to do so as he could
> have had a very valid reason for doing this.....
My my, how we're so "comfortable" when it comes to decisions Bob makes
where the movitations and details surrounding them aren't public
knowledge, yet when Dean Smith punishes King Rice but decides not to go
public with the details, you're all over him.
Can you say "Thypocrisy (tm)"? I knew you could ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.796 | My only response to such a weak attempt | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 20 1992 17:26 | 37 |
| Only a small discrepency here....
To my knowledge Knight has never been publicly asked to explain his
decision and Funderburke has never complained about the situation in which
Knight held back his committment. Knight does not pull punches and if
asked about the situation he would have honestly given his reasons
behind it.
However, King Rice was arrested, charged and was found guilty of committing
a crime in which Dean Smith completely ignored. It was part of the
public record and for the integrity of the school and program Smith
should have publicly denounced Rice's actions and punished him for
this embarrassing criminal activity.
Lot's of young people look up to players in major college programs
and Smith sent out the wrong message by not decrying the act to
be wrong and letting him go unpunished.
Smith doesn't have the integrity nor the backbone to take a public
stance like this. His lack of response showed everyone that abusing
alcohol, beating up a woman, destroying property and resisting arrest
is ok by Dean Smith and the Carolina program.
Dean was too worried about losing his point guard than to do the right
thing and send a message to his players, the university and the fans.
So in your book beating up a woman is good, but holding a kid to his
committment is bad. What if it was your daughter that was attacked and
beat up by a college basketball player??? Me thinks your position
would change.
It's a very sad situation and one in which you should be ashamed of
supporting.
Cap
|
15.797 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Thu Feb 20 1992 17:59 | 8 |
| Chris -
I don't remmber Fundebunk beating up on a woman, ala King Rice. Big
difference, in my book. IMO, King shoulda been chucked from the team
for such an offense - but I guess in Dean's book its okay to slap a
woman around...
JD
|
15.798 | Tried to resist, Mildcat, really I did :^) | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Feb 20 1992 18:37 | 9 |
| RE .745 - Great point! Who is running the ship at MSU? Has Jud lost
touch? One would think the inmates may be running the asylum after the
46 point turn-around to Indiana!
WILDCAT - NOT!!!
|
15.799 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Talkin' Softball | Fri Feb 21 1992 08:20 | 4 |
| I was still wonderin' did Knight recruit Funderburke or did
Funderburke recruit Knight? Will we ever know?
/Don
|
15.800 | | CAMONE::WAY | You'll be left with empty arms | Fri Feb 21 1992 08:35 | 3 |
| Does any body really know what time it is?
Does anybody really care?
|
15.801 | caring about time is alot like rugby | CST17::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Fri Feb 21 1992 08:48 | 1 |
|
|
15.802 | Cap like a Cat backed into a corner whenever Bob is threatened | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 21 1992 09:54 | 61 |
| > However, King Rice was arrested, charged and was found guilty of committing
> a crime in which Dean Smith completely ignored. It was part of the
> public record and for the integrity of the school and program Smith
> should have publicly denounced Rice's actions and punished him for
> this embarrassing criminal activity.
This is a 100% bald-faced lie. "Completely ignored"? You can't be
serious. Didn't publicly denounce? I posted the exact text of Dean's
press release after the incident, during which he most definitely
publicly denounced Rice's poor judgement. You're way, way off base
here, with your only axe to grind the fact that Dean didn't publicly
state exactly what punishments he imposed, a matter he considered
private.
> Lot's of young people look up to players in major college programs
> and Smith sent out the wrong message by not decrying the act to
> be wrong and letting him go unpunished.
Another lie. He did speak out against the event and did punish Rice.
What kind of integrity can you hope to maintain when you state
completely incorrect information? [none]
> Smith doesn't have the integrity nor the backbone to take a public
> stance like this. His lack of response showed everyone that abusing
> alcohol, beating up a woman, destroying property and resisting arrest
> is ok by Dean Smith and the Carolina program.
What a load. Not even the most orthodox of Weasel would dare suggest
that Dean doesn't have integrity or a backbone to take a public stand.
He benched JR Reid prior to an NCAA Tournament game for missing curfew
by a few minutes. Why don't you go ask your buddy Bob Knight what kind
of integrity Dean has - or anybody else on the planet who possesses
even the smallest understanding of what integrity is all about.
> Dean was too worried about losing his point guard than to do the right
> thing and send a message to his players, the university and the fans.
Bull. Dean had recruited a PG who was more talented than Rice. Most
coaches would've written King off and gone with the freshman.
> So in your book beating up a woman is good, but holding a kid to his
> committment is bad. What if it was your daughter that was attacked and
> beat up by a college basketball player??? Me thinks your position
> would change.
Spare us the melodrama. The woman involved was his girlfriend, not a
total stranger. Rice was wrong - I've said it, Dean's said it, our
criminal justice system has said it. Rice pulled community service
time for his offense. The only issue at hand is whether Dean's
punishments shoulda been made public. BIG DEAL.
> It's a very sad situation and one in which you should be ashamed of
> supporting.
Ashamed of supporting the fact that Dean Smith decided to punish King
Rice without telling the whole world what those specific punishments
were. Oh yea, this is a moral transgression that ranks up there with
the worst of 'em all right.
- ACC Chris
|
15.803 | Say what!? | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:03 | 3 |
| What in the world difference does it make that the girl was his
'girlfriend' and not a 'total stranger'?
Denny
|
15.804 | Nit-picking around the edges of both men's established integrity | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:04 | 12 |
|
Both the King Rice and Lawrence Funderburke situations are complete
non-issues that pale in comparison to some of other the stuff that has
gone on in intercollegiate sports. Not only are they both non-issues,
depending on your interpretation they both may even be examples of
coaches doing *right* (considering Smith's hidden punishment of Rice and
Knight's missing explanation for holding back Funderburke we're dealing
with incomplete information). The attacks from both sides on these two
situations are clearly motivated out of self-interest and partisanship...
glenn
|
15.805 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:20 | 33 |
| I back Knight 100% on the Funderburke issue - except for why he didn't
let him out of the letter of intent. I think he should have.
I back Smith 100% on the Rice issue - especially on not making the
punishment public, because I don't think it needed to be. Not
everything that goes on with an athletic team can or should be public
knowledge, and I don't think this equates to it being swept under the
rug.
If we're going to attack anyone in college basketball, we should be
spending our time attacking the sleazeballs - not these two guys. Who
does and who doesn't get a technical foul and why and for how long
between technicals is completely irrelevant. The only shortcoming in
Smith's career is the relative lack of national championships he's won.
Chris is obviously happy with this lack. Most of us either sincerely
are not or use it as a means of needling him about it. Besides, it
means more national championships available for your favorite team, so
I don't see why it should bother you - you should be glad that Smith
"chokes."
If you objectively ask the question (as I have), if you had a
basketball playing son, would you have him play for this man, I think
you can answer the question, objectively, yes in both cases. If I had
a son and if he was going off to play for Knight, however, I would make
damn sure he knew what he was getting into and be able to handle it - I
equate playing basketball at Indiana to a certain degree to enlisting
in the Marines. If he was going off to play for Smith, I would make
sure he knew the System is above all and Smith will stick with it and
never deviate from it even when it's not working.
Time to crawl back into my hole.
John
|
15.806 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:42 | 5 |
| Apologies to Cap for calling him a "liar". Uninformed may have been a
better choice.
- ACC Chris
|
15.807 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:44 | 3 |
| Excellent note John. You need to crawl out of your hole more often!
WILDCAT
|
15.808 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Fri Feb 21 1992 10:53 | 8 |
|
Well I do have a son and if given the choice I'd have my son play for Bobby.
Why? Because Bobby's system rewards players that work hard from week to week,
year to year. Dean's system rewards seniors requardless of their lack of
ability or work habits. Bobby adapts better in the clutch, and isn't against
changing his system to fit his players, the other guy is a stubborn ole coot.
mike
|
15.809 | | ESKIMO::CAPPEL | | Fri Feb 21 1992 11:55 | 9 |
|
Thanks ACChris,
I never read an issued statement from Dean or attributed to Dean on
the King Rice situation and if he did condemn these actions publicly
that I reverse my stand.....
It's true that the punishment did not have to be made public as long
as the actions were condemned by the university and coaching staff.
|
15.810 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Feb 21 1992 12:35 | 26 |
| re .793
Classic note Cap. You genius you. If I were in the same city as
you I'd have your toes jammed in my mouf' right now!
As for the Burp, he had extreme behavioral problems as a youth. He
got into some very serious trouble. His family background is such
that what I heard from a buddy who partied with Randy Ayers in Mpls.
last year cain't even be entered in here. Let's just say he comes
from a past that raises eyebrows even in the ghetto.
Kids like this often get sent away to the Marines or Infrantry to
figure it all out. They have no choice but to, cuz you cain't quit.
Burp decided he wasn't up to the Marines and wanted to stay and slough.
His fellow soldiers said either measure up or wash out. He washed.
I agree with Bob for not releasing him. He needed a final lesson that
being a widebody nuke doesn't mean a separate set of rules. Not only
did he learn that lesson, he publicly stated he felt bad about quitting,
holds nothing against Bob, and is glad he ended up at OSU. If you
followed the list a some a the scumbag programs he wanted to go to if
he'd been released you'll agree he's better off on a team with people
like Jim Jackson and Randy Ayers to help this emotional 12 year old
grow up.
MrT
|
15.811 | Go for 7 again, JJ, go for 7 | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Sat Feb 22 1992 09:37 | 15 |
|
This note is NOT related to any on-going Lawrence Funderburke
discussion.
Just read in the local paper that Dick Vitale has issued an apology
for remarks he made about Funderburke during a commercial break. Apparently
the announcers were viewing a replay of an exchange of forearms between
the Wandering One and Chris Street, and Vitale said "That (expletive)
shouldn't even be in college basketball - we were right." His mike was live,
so the comment went out over the satellite feed.
Anybody see this play? Was Vitale overreacting (does he ever NOT
overreact), or has Funderburke still not cleaned up his act?
tom
|
15.812 | 13 down, 5 to go, 4 would do it | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Sun Feb 23 1992 22:53 | 17 |
|
Big 6-point win for the Hoosiers today at Columbus. Alan Henderson
and Calbert Cheaney led the way offensively, but Cheaney's defense on JJ
may have been the difference in the game. Jackson ended up with 24, but most
of those came in the second half off of switches that left him posted up on
Damon Bailey. Cheaney effectively made Jackson a second option, and Ohio
State's offense suffered for it.
Lawrence Funderburke continues to impress on the defensive end, but
the Buckeye offense has seemed out of synch ever since he became eligible,
and you have to wonder if they'll be able to find their stride before the end
of the season. The Hoosiers, on the other hand, continue to show that their
a very good team on the offensive end when the jump shots fall early.
Next up: Illinois in Bloomington on Sunday.
tom
|
15.813 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 24 1992 10:38 | 47 |
| Biggest win for my Hoosiers since '87. Their first grade A road win
of the year. The non-Almost Big10 Title is theirs for the taking now,
all they have to do is match OSU with the tough road games and hold
at home.
On the Hoosiers: They proved they cain win a tough one even with
1) Eric Anderson still mired in his inexplicable shooting slump,
2) GGraham - who's challenged Calbert for best player - having a quiet
game, 3) poor shooting from the guard position and, 4) their usual poor
start on offense.
They outrebounded the Buckeyes 32-30. Calbert Cheaney's floor game has
been inspired, playing at a level hard to imagine before his "humiliating"
benching by the "insane" Bob Knight. He shut JJ down. He got critical
'bounds. He moved relentlessly without the ball.
The best news out a this game for the Hoosiers is Alan Henderson. Hindu
arrived in a road game against a very tough team going up against big
quick guys like Jent and Burp... and he starred. From the opening bell
Hindu looked possessed, taking charge in the paint and with the ball in
his hands. He shot 10-13 on the day with 9 'bounds, several blocked
shots, and 24 points. If Hindu cain keep himself at this level the
Hoosiers might be an outside shot to overcome the deep widebody squads
and move into the Final4.
Ohio State? I like Randy Ayers, he's a great recruiter and his teams
play inspired ball and tough D. But his teams' offensive execution is
sloppy and inefficient. It looks like OSU is in the midst of a late
year mini-fade for the 2nd year in a row.
Also, anybody notice how Burpoid disappeared in the 2nd half? Yes he
made a number of awesome blocks and 'boards but the Hoosiers kept
running it straight at him and he faded. Hindu outplayed him just like
Calbert outplayed JJ. At *their* place.
It was also great to see Damon come out and be physically intimidated
by bigger quicker guards and manage to establish himself. "Airr Haiiids!!
Airrr Haiiids!!" He shot 6-12 with 3-5 from the Land o' Trey and 17 pts.
Only criticism of the Hoosiers is how the guards kept picking up the
dribble down the stretch. But maybe Bob had told them to do this for
some reason.
Funderburke is a thug who doesn't belong in the Big10 and definitely
never belonged in an Indiana uniform.
MrT
|
15.814 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Mon Feb 24 1992 11:19 | 8 |
| MrTr -
Henderson sure did look good. Anderson's shooting woes have, IMO, not
bothered the rest of his game - he played good defense and had some
great blocks in the 2nd half. Calbert is playing very well, and
Bailey is showing more confidence in his game every time I see him.
JD
|
15.815 | we may never know | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 24 1992 11:19 | 22 |
| Funderburke had 8 pts, 9 'bounds, and 7 blocked shots.
On the Vitale comment, here's what happened. In the Iowa vs. OSU
game a week ago, Burp did his usual thing and clocked Chris Street
with a forearm to the chin, reminiscent of the clothesline job he
laid on Damon at Bloomington earlier this year, and several other
cheap shots he's pulled since he donned the red & silver.
After the refs separated them a TO was called. Vitale assumed his
mike was dead. He said, "Did you see that? This &#)&^%#$@# Funderburke
guy doesn't belong in college basketball, he's proved us right."
You cain feel in the blank as to what Vitale said. But those watching
the game on satellite dishes and rural cable networks that cain't sell
the commercial time heard it live.
I've got a college buddy who's VP a a media outfit that runs several
cable operations checking to find out what Dickie said. Trouble is the
engineers usually keep the sound muted on the live feed as they sit
there in the cable control operations center.
MrT
|
15.816 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | DeanSmith > SteveKnight | Mon Feb 24 1992 12:14 | 4 |
| Can we safely assume that Indiana played the perfect game
yesterday, given their dearth of BIGMAN talent?
/Don
|
15.817 | | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | BearCATS >>> Buckeyes | Mon Feb 24 1992 12:36 | 5 |
|
OSU is overrated... Expect an early exit from the NCAA's for the
Buckeyes.
/Jeff
|
15.818 | | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Feb 24 1992 12:43 | 20 |
|
It is an observation of mine that the IU win was due not only to the
solid(but not great) defense and the OSU offensive execution was poor
as mentioned. I ususally hate to agree with announcers but Packer was
totally right in that OSU didn't go back to JJ after he brought them
back. Their offensive was to get JJ open off screens or whatever but
after the game was tied he would come off the screen and someone would
already be shooting the ball. Particularly Baker and Brown had poor
second halfs. Cheaneys D was good in a denial phase but if and when JJ
got the ball in his hand it didn't matter whether Cheaney or Baily was
on the D, they got used up.
There is certainly and Knight(pun intended) and day difference in IU
when a few J's fall. It makes even their passing 3 or 4 times more
efficient. To OSU discredit they still didn't figure out, no matter how
many passes the ball was still going back to the hot guy. Which is why
they didn't use the tactics themselves.
Roy L. Quinn
x31141
|
15.819 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 24 1992 12:57 | 39 |
| JJ was covered primarily by Calbert in the first half and shot
poorly. In the 2nd half they went to switches in order to get
Damon on JJ (this despite the FACK that Damon was established in
H.S. as one a the most talented guards in the game's history, he
of the putative 36" leaping ability) and raised JJ's shooting to
12-23. Even then, with everybody in the building aware that JJ
was gonna run the clear out 1-on-1 against Damon JJ had the ball
taken out a his hands by help-out guys 2-3 times which clinched
the game.
Calbert has learned how to get his jump against his assignment and
maintain verticality with his blocking-hand and not make the stupid
foul. Eric and Alan were doing the same thing: Beaten along the
baseline they bothered the shooter without making the desperation
foul - probably the key to the win.
re: /Roach
Yeah, they *did* play at peak efficiency despite the lack a a BIGMAN.
They played great D, boarded well, kept running the offense, and after
their usual bad J-shooting at the outset ended up shooting well.
But there's a twist. If Alan cain play at that level they're much less
weak along the baseline. True, OSU is a 3-guard team and relatively
small, so it's not indicative of what they cain do against, say, an
Arkansas or Zona or UCLA. But if Alan, all 6-9 200 lbs a him, cain
play with the intensity of yesterday his good timing hands and quickness
make them harder to punish in the paint.
Regardless they'll still be woefully shallow in the front-court, with
only the extremely limited Matt Nover as a backup. But if they stay
out a foul trouble and play some inside D and rebound ok and Alan's
progress continues then Indiana cain potentially upset one a the top
teams in the tourney.
Michigan will be a good litmus test of how they cain do against nuke
widebodystud talent.
MrT
|
15.820 | IU vs. OSU | JURAN::MCKAY | | Mon Feb 24 1992 12:57 | 11 |
| I didn't think JJ was shut down by anyone. He certainly abused
Bailey on the low post in the second half. I think OSU should have
used him more in the O.
I thought it was a good game to watch. OSU had the lead the entire
first half until the last few minutes. Bailey hit a great three
pointer from inside the half court line to end the half. I thought
the difference in the game was Indiana was hitting the three and
OSU didn't.
Jimbo
|
15.821 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Feb 24 1992 13:09 | 31 |
| JJ himself stated after the game that he had a lousy first half cuz
Calbert & Co. did a great job a denying him the ball. Also, in the
1st half Calbert forced JJ to miss some shots and to change others.
JJ even had a shot stuffed back into his face!
The buckets that JJ did get in the 1st half were often of the highlight
film variety, one a drive n' stop in the lane where Cheaney stayed with
him and JJ leaped backwards toward the foul stripe and double pumped an
eye-popping fall-down fadeaway to the bottom of the net.
This is why in the 2nd half OSU decided to run picks designed to get
JJ away from Calbert and isolated against the all-time-great-talent
Damon Bailey. They did this several possessions in a row.
I thought the difference in the game was the grade C offensive scheme
that Randy Ayers is somehow stuck with, and that Indiana stayed in
their offense the whole way through, even when they were down by 10
points.
Funny thing, if you didn't know the score and watched the first half -
with ThunderBurp making mindblowing blocks and bodies-flying 'bounds
and JJ dropping impossible shots with Calbert laying all over him -
you couldn't have believed that with 2 minutes left in the half that
Indiana was down by only 2.
Then the two Damon treys, then the 2nd half outset run, then the failed
reliance on the JJ clearouts, not to mention ThunderBurp's disappearance
in the 2nd half. Wish I had a film of the game to see what Bob put on
Burp after the half, it worked.
MrT
|
15.822 | Not too easy for either one | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Feb 24 1992 22:11 | 25 |
|
Remaining schedule for the Hoosiers and the Buckeyes:
Ohio State Indiana
---------- -------
2/26 at Purdue
2/29 at Michigan State
3/1 Illinois
3/3 Michigan
3/4 at Iowa
3/7 Northwestern
3/8 at Michigan
3/11 Illinois
3/12 Wisconsin
3/14* at Minnesota 3/14* at Purdue
* - both games have a 3/15 alternate date
Nice time for a week off for the Hoosiers. By the time they play
again, they'll have a pretty good idea of what they have to do to
win the title.
tom
|
15.823 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | make the right choice, Tsongas | Tue Feb 25 1992 10:21 | 12 |
|
What Packer failed to mentioned is that after JJ brought them back by
abusing Damon, Bobby brought Reynolds in off the bench to play JJ. Chris
Reynolds is one of the best players in teh game at overplaying his opponent
and not allowing him to get the ball...
Bobby sure is patient with Damon...
Henderson's game was a great surprise. I thought he not Calbert should have
been player of the game...
mike
|
15.824 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Feb 25 1992 10:28 | 18 |
| So it all comes down to the week of the 8th. Although Gene Keady
always has something up his sleeve when the Hoosiers roll into that
snakepit called Mackey Arena.
I see the Michigan game as a perfect test for the Hoosiers. I also
could barely believe that the AP has Iowa ranked at about 40th.
The Buckeyes may be in for a nasty surprise when they come to
Williams - the Gophers are a young team that should be at their best
at season's end, and will have best-player Randy Carter back in shape
by then.
Yoder announced he's leaving Wisconsin, the school's buying out his
contract.
MrT
|
15.825 | Things could change, but probably will not... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 25 1992 11:28 | 12 |
| > Regardless they'll still be woefully shallow in the front-court, with
> only the extremely limited Matt Nover as a backup. But if they stay
> out a foul trouble and play some inside D and rebound ok and Alan's
> progress continues then Indiana cain potentially upset one a the top
> teams in the tourney.
It will be pretty hard to "upset one a the top teams in the tourney"
when they will likely be a #1 seed in either the East, Southeast, or
Midwest regionals. Unless teams make some major blunders, it appears
to me that Duke, Indiana, Kansas, and UCLA should be the top seeds in
the 4 regionals. Any IU victory before the final four could not be
considered an upset.
|
15.826 | UM season rides on March 8th | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Tue Feb 25 1992 12:10 | 31 |
| I think Michigan will beat Indiana in Ann Arbor for a couple of
reasons:
1) Michigan has the best talent in the Big Ten
2) Chrysler will be rockin' for that game; it will too loud for the
refs to hear/be-intimidated-by Knight
3) This is the biggest game of the year for the Wolverines
The current Michigan team is similar in talent to the Joubert/Grant
years in Ann Arbor. Typically, they would lose @ Indiana even though
they had no business doing so (Frieder can't coach,) then they would
come back and paste Indiana in the Ann Arbor game. I look for the same
thing to happen this year, UM big. Of course, they lost in Bloomington
this year as well, Fisher cant coach either.
I look for a real exciting NCAA tourney this year. There is no dominant
team, I think the championship could go to any of the top ten or twenty
teams, whoever gets on a roll.
From the Big Ten, I think OSU still has the best shot at winning the
whole thing, and of course you can't count out Indiana with Knight.
Michigan has a shot if they get on a roll, but they'll probably lose
as soon as they run into a coach on a neutral floor.
MSU has a shot, Jud always has them ready, but I don't know if there's
enough talent to go all the way.
-dennis
|
15.827 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Feb 25 1992 12:31 | 20 |
| I agree that OSU has the best shot at the NCAA Title, and that MSU
could be tough if they found any consistency cuz they have the pieces.
I have been disappointed in the job Jud's put in with this squad the
past two years, but he cain coach and might get the inconsistency
problem fixed by tourney time.
I also agree that Indiana should lose at Crisler. But they shoulda
lost at St. John and they ended up controllling the 2nd half. UM
will win big ONLY if they totally dominate up front (blocks, boards)
which is a possibility. If they only outplay them up front, which
they should with their superior talent and size, then IU cain win with
good shooting and execution.
You're so right about the emotion surrounding Bob's appearances in
Crisler, and that'll be a big factor, especially with a young team
where emotion is so important.
Don't count Iowa out - most underrated squad in the country.
MrT
|
15.828 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Where's Roger? | Wed Feb 26 1992 09:33 | 4 |
| Indiana's ranked #2! They've been playing so many perfect games
maybe we should call this a perfect season!
/Don
|
15.829 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Wed Feb 26 1992 12:38 | 7 |
| Cake it, smart-ace. How cain IU be better than UCLA, who stomped
them on a neutral floor, and with twice as many losses? These
polls are stupid but important (seeds, recruiting, TV exposure),
but IU is a long-shot for the Final4 and probably has no business
in the Excellent8. [nocenternofrontlinedepthspottyoutsideshooting]
MrT
|
15.830 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 26 1992 12:48 | 2 |
| .829 sounds to me like someone who has had enough of the big, black
bird. ;^)
|
15.831 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Feb 26 1992 12:51 | 2 |
| Nah Mac, just his usual sandbaggin'.
Denny
|
15.832 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Where's Roger? | Wed Feb 26 1992 13:27 | 5 |
| Sandbaggin'? What he's doing is worse. He's spinning more
than a 45 at a Sock Hop! Indiana is #2 in the nation. Anything
less than a Final Four appearance is SnuffmeisterLikeGaggin'!
/Don
|
15.833 | No rewarding IU regular season IU underachievement this season! :^) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Feb 26 1992 14:56 | 8 |
| MrT just sent me mail indicating that, due to obvious weaknesses and
talent shortfalls, reaching the round of 16 should mark this a
successful year for the Hoosiers.
Just thought y'all would want to know,
- ACC Chris
|
15.834 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Feb 26 1992 15:01 | 7 |
| T's problem is that he thinks all the other teams have no problems
themselves. It is true that IU has some problems, but it seems to
me that all the other teams have problems as well, which T seems to
forget. IU deserves their #2 ranking at this point, and if they
win their home games, and beat Michigan on the road, they'll be a
#1 in the NCAA's and anything less than a final four spot would be
underachieveing (just like last year, BTW).
|
15.835 | | JENEVR::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Feb 26 1992 15:11 | 10 |
|
Indiana as #2 is pushing it, they just happened to win a big game the
same week that lots of teams in the top 10 lost. There are probably
more teams that can win the NCAA's this year then usual. So even if a
team has a #1 seed in a regional, not getting to the final 4 does not
necessarily mean underachieving this year. The one possible exception
to that is Duke.
The Crazy Met
|
15.836 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Wed Feb 26 1992 15:13 | 4 |
| Indiana barely moved into the #2 spot, edging out Kansas by 1 vote.
Both IU and KU received 7 first-place votes.
Joe
|
15.837 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Where's Roger? | Wed Feb 26 1992 15:28 | 4 |
| They're still a top 5 team. MrT would have you believe that
everybody but Po' Indiana is loaded with NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS�.
/Don
|
15.838 | Michigan still dazed ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ... | Thu Feb 27 1992 13:47 | 3 |
| Wisconsin oughta fire their coach more often !!!
Bob Hunt
|
15.839 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Feb 27 1992 15:00 | 21 |
| Lookit, the Hoosiers fell behind a not-great Kaintuck team, in
Indiana, by 18 pts. and then came back to save face losing. They
got blown out on a neutral court by UCLA. They got blown out on
the road by Michigan State. They were handled by a non-tourney
team Minnesota on the road.
This is not the mark a a great team. Especially considering what
the analysts have noted repeatedly now:
notruecenternofrontlinedepthshakyoutsideshooting.
With the knowledge and prep time available to Bob in the Big10 he
cain squeeze the last drop out a these guys. When he goes into the
tourney they're a 2nd rank squad behind the likes a Duke/UCLA/Arkansas/
Kansas/Zona.
That's just the way it is. Don't blame *me* for joe inability to deal
with Reality!
MrT
|
15.840 | IU '92 -- Dance Fever ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ... | Thu Feb 27 1992 15:18 | 15 |
| � notruecenternofrontlinedepthshakyoutsideshooting.
This is the same problem Bob had in '87, too. Okay, maybe Steve Alford by
hisself raised the ante to "onlyonegreatoutsideshooter" but post-Brink Bob
delighted his fans (and enfuriated his foes) when he mightily strapped on
the String Of G in Nawlins in '87. {Trust me, T, it was in New Orleans!}
Forgive us if we expect another title run this year in BobVille. Tis been
a while since he had the horses to even _think_ about grabbing the Big
Enchilada. They ain't nearly as po' folks as you make 'em out to be.
Au contraire, if Duke's injury woes worsen, the Hoosiers can and should
think about doin' some Heavy Dancin' up your way come April.
Bob Hunt
|
15.841 | duke excuses already ? | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Thu Feb 27 1992 15:22 | 2 |
| Duke is very beatable with/without injuries. Michigan gave them the
game back in Ann Arbor when Duke was at full strength.
|
15.842 | I'm comin' round to MrT's way a thinkin' | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Greenwell talks, Roger balks | Thu Feb 27 1992 15:23 | 5 |
| No way Bob! If Indiana can win it's first round game it will
be a tribute to what an Xcellent coach Bob Knight is! Anything
after that qualifies as miracle material!
/Don
|
15.843 | Ain't an excuse ... just reality | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ... | Thu Feb 27 1992 15:40 | 12 |
| � -< duke excuses already ? >-
I make no excuses for Duke. With everyone healthy and with something to
play for, they are the toughest team in the nation. Bar none.
Krzyzewski, a Bob disciple don't forget, is *easily* the best coach in the
ACC and he'll have the young Devils battle-hardened by Dance time.
It was *reasonable* to expect them to do some serious repeating if they
were only missing Hurley but if Grant Hill is gone as well ... the door is
opened just that much wider. Kenny Blakeney is not a titlist PG.
Bob Hunt
|
15.844 | How 'bout some Objective Proof? | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 27 1992 16:07 | 9 |
| > is *easily* the best coach in the ACC
Bob, would you mind posting CoachK's head-to-head record against Dean
Smith for confirmation of this. Assuming you don't find it fair to
compare overall records cause K took over a floundering program, how
'bout just the last five (5) years?
- ACC Chris
|
15.845 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Feb 27 1992 16:26 | 16 |
|
Re -1
This will prove the following:
1: If Dean has won more games against Coach K than it clearly shows
that Dean is an underachiever as Duke has made the final four
so many times in that span and that Coach K is a superior coach.
2: If CoachK has won more games against Snuffy, than it clearly shows
that he is a superior coach and Snuffy is an underachiever.
Since this is a no-win situation for the Snuffster why put yourself
through such misery? If you want to continue to do so than please
provide your answers on why Dean has been the better coach over the
last 5 years.
|
15.846 | | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Thu Feb 27 1992 17:07 | 14 |
| Duke has a good team, no doubt, but they are not heads above the
rest of the country with or without injuries. If they were, they would
not have had the close calls that they did.
The best team in the country will win the NCAA tournament. If that's
Duke, then great, but it won't matter whether or not they had injuries.
I'm hoping for one of the lower seeds to take it this year; I really
think there is enough balance for it to happen.
we'll see, I can't wait, for me, the NCAA tourney is the Sporting Event of
the year!
-dennis
|
15.847 | Simple question. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 27 1992 17:07 | 8 |
| Let me get this straight. When comparing two (2) coaches it's more
fair to use NCAA Tournament results (defined as 'Number of Times They
Reached The Final 4') than head-to-head results.
True?
- ACC Chris
|
15.848 | you are kidding, right??? | JENEVR::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Thu Feb 27 1992 17:22 | 17 |
| re: .846
> The best team in the country will win the NCAA tournament.
Utterly ridiculous. The best team in the country does not always win
the NCAA unless your definition of the best team is solely based on who
won the NCAA tournament.
NC State was no the best team in 1983, Villanova was not the best in
1985, I don't think Duke was the best in 1991. All 3 teams won the NCAA
tournament. Of course the best team occasionally does win, NC in 1982,
Vegas in 1990, maybe Indiana in 1987, Georgetown in 1984.
fyi: I may have some of the years mixed up, but you get the idea.
The Crazy Met
|
15.849 | Believe me, I'm not lobbying for change. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Feb 27 1992 18:00 | 8 |
| Correct, Met. As has been documented, the best team very rarely wins
the NCAA Tournament. I don't think this detracts from the
accomplishment in any way, but if we really wanted to select the best
team we'd only invite a few teams and let them play a best-of-7 series,
NBA style. (**BORING!!**)
- ACC Chris
|
15.850 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Feb 27 1992 22:23 | 40 |
| >This is the same problem Bob had in '87 .
No way. In '87 Bob had a long-armed 6-11 true center in Dean Garrett.
Granted, he wasn't all that talented, but he could block and change
shots and board and fulfill his role. '87 Hoosiers also had a number
of other front-line players who were vets, big people who could set
picks and play D and hit the open J.
Not so this year. '92 Hoosiers have a 195 lb frosh fwd at center, a
good fwd in Anderson, a great small fwd in Calbert... and then nobody
to play even a role on the big-time level. In fack, the only sub they
have for the front-line is the awful Matt Nover. Frosh Todd Lindemann
coming into a hotly contested game would be a_unmitigated disaster.
He'll be redshirted next year.
Big diff between '87 and '92. '87 had balance; '92 doesn't.
re: Last two
The best team seldom wins? Duke was clearly the best last year. Ditto
for the Runnin' Rabble year before last. I've done this routine before
(deep breath): UCLA was almost always clearly the best their 10 champ
years when they dominated recruiting totally and were so well coached.
Kentucky was the creme de la creme when the Robey/Givens/Phillips team
won. Same for IU in '76, maybe the best *team* ever, and in '81 when
they coalesced late and swept through the tourney rolling over a tough
bracket setting the record for widest avg tourney winning margin that
still stands (Landon and Ray Tolbert and Isiah were just too much).
Michigan was the best in '89, the most talented. TRue, it took the
firing a a stupid coach to allow them to take their Title, but that's
the key: Those "best teams" who didn't win were usually coached by the
likes a a Jim BayWhine or Lou HitSome.
Also on the "best team Titleist" would be the '81 Carolina team and
the Gougetown team.
Add '84 to the stumblebum category, they were the best awright...
MrT
|
15.851 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Feb 27 1992 22:30 | 23 |
| Add to the best team Titleist roster both a Denny Crum's squads,
not to mention the David Thompson team.
The thing is this: In some years, most in fack, it takes a tourney
to prove who's best cuz the thing starts with 3-5 teams in a class.
In some years there's a outstanding squad whom everybody sees winning.
This year Duke's the best, but they're not outstanding from the creme
de la creme. My creamy Title group this year would be:
Duke
Arkansas
UCLA
Kansas
Zona
Then you drop to your B-teams, the Okla States and Indianas and
Star Hells and the like.
Then the C-teams, who in this parity year could win It All, like
Gougetown, Michigan State, Iowa, Missouri, and similar ilk.
MrT
|
15.852 | | AUNTB::ROSS | MrT smells like Teen Spirit | Thu Feb 27 1992 23:35 | 11 |
| MrT, sandbagging again... Indiana will be underachieving if they fail
to reach at least Final 8.
For those of you who care to listen to IU on the radio, I have been
able to pick them up loud and clear at 1190 AM all the way down here
in South Carolina. Bob Knight's radio call-in show is a trip. Last
week he could be heard rummaging around in his trash can {he does the
show via phone from his office} looking for a stat sheet.... just left
the air for about two minutes.
|
15.853 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 08:21 | 3 |
| If UCLA is cream, it's definitely sour cream after last night.
/Don
|
15.854 | | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Fri Feb 28 1992 08:43 | 9 |
| re .848
NC State was the best team in 1983
Villanova was not the best in 1985
Duke was the best in 1991
that's why they play the tounament. That's why polls don't always tell
the truth.
|
15.855 | Do I see Da Lite ? | LUNER::BROOKS | Software : Art Of The State | Fri Feb 28 1992 09:52 | 8 |
| re .842
Slasher, let's see if I get this right ... Indiana is incapable of
underacheiving right ?
All wins are due to the genius of Coach BobCat ?
Doc
|
15.856 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 09:56 | 5 |
| Absolutely Doc, one visit with Ms. Odorgaard and your anti-Hoosier
sentiments will be history. I'm on the bi-weekly schedule. She
has shown me the value of BobKnight discipline.
/Don
|
15.857 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Software : Art Of The State | Fri Feb 28 1992 09:56 | 7 |
| re .854
You have got to be doing SPORTSrooms if you *really* believe that
NC Skate was superior to the Coogs in '83.
The Coogs were the best team not to win a title in NCAA history (thanks
Guy Lewis ...:-( ....
|
15.858 | | JENEVR::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Fri Feb 28 1992 10:03 | 8 |
| re: .854
In a one game crapshoot teams can pull an upset.
If Duke-UNLV in 1991 or Houston-NC State in 1983 had played a best
of 7 I would put my money on UNLV and NC State winning the series.
The Crazy Met
|
15.859 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Seinfeld roolz! | Fri Feb 28 1992 10:36 | 17 |
| For the most part, the best team does win the tourney. DOn't forget,
that the '6th' man of those teams is the coach. Take Houston vs. N.C.
State. Yeah, Houston *may* have had the names - but think about N.C.
state's team. They had talent - and Valvano was a far superior game
coach than Lewis. Don't forget what plagued the Cougars in thier
failures - foul shooting was very bad - and coaching. Akeem was still
pretty unpolished, and no where near the force he became in the
tourney. I think both teams were closer in talent than most folks
think.
The Cougs came close, and lost. It ins't like they had a
Perkins/Jordan/Daugherty type lineup and got beat, afterall...
And even if Bob does underachieve this year - so what - he's still
light year's ahead of the master underachiever down there at UNC.
JD
|
15.860 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:06 | 18 |
| re: Midnight and /Roachy in the peanut gallery
What happens to the Hoosiers in the tourney will have nothing to do
with Bob's greatness, which he has already established over a period
of 20 years.
Say what you will, but joe all is anti-sandbagging. The Hoosiers
show all the signs of a team playing at maximum, occassionally
breaking down and ending up 18 behind a Kaintuck, 14 behind a Minny,
25 behind Michigan State, or 28 behind UCLA.
They're good but not great. Too thin up front, and it shows. The
script here sez they'll run into a 3-5 seed with big quick people
who'll shooting 50% and outrebound them by 10-15 and block several
shots and change even more... IU could get blown out by such a team.
MrT
|
15.861 | Anti-sandbagging? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:08 | 1 |
|
|
15.862 | Same goes for Dean, BTW ... | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:14 | 21 |
| > They're good but not great. Too thin up front, and it shows. The
> script here sez they'll run into a 3-5 seed with big quick people
> who'll shooting 50% and outrebound them by 10-15 and block several
> shots and change even more... IU could get blown out by such a team.
As you say, they could be blown out by such a team. Of course, it could
happen because they weren't prepared to play that team, or because they
had a bad game plan. Let's face it, if a team is the #2 ranked team in
the country, it didn't happen by accident, and with proper preparation
and motivation, should be able to beat a team that is perhaps a little
more athletic but has weaknesses that have been exploited more often
and more easily by other teams than the nation's #2 team has. And that's
the point: IU has weaknesses, but so does everyone else, and the fact
is that everyone else's weaknesses have been even more easily exploitable
than Indiana's. With proper preparation and game coaching, IU should be
able to beat teams not as highly ranked as they are, and would have to be
considered underachievers if they are upset in the tournament.
And, as you say, such an upset wouldn't have any bearing on Bob's past
triumphs. It would be a reflection, to some degree, on his coaching of the
current team, however.
|
15.863 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:14 | 24 |
| I don't think the best team usually wins it. With a 7-game series the
best team usually would win it (see NBA), but with the 1-loss
elimination format things are much less predictable. Ask yourself if
these teams would've won it if they were playing best-of-7:
NCState in '83
Villanova in '85
Kansas in '88
Duke in '91
Answer: No way. But that's what makes the tourney great. Compare it
to the upcoming NBA playoffs - the only suspense is whether anybody can
get 2 wins against the Bulls in a series. (BTW, anyone who thinks Duke was
flat-out a better team than Vegas last year is high).
Even years like '89 you can get a couple semi-darkhorses in the
championship game. Weren't Michigan and SEton Hall both #3 seeds? I
know for a fact that hardly anyone gave Seton Hall a chance to even come out
of the West that year with teams like Arizona and Indiana making it to
the West Regionals.
Joe
|
15.864 | Anti-sandbagging ... whatta hoot. | SCNDRL::HUNT | Three little birds sit by my doorstep ... | Fri Feb 28 1992 11:26 | 11 |
| There's no doubt that the Hoosiers *could* get blown out at any time in the
Big Dance. None whatsoever. But when they're on and playing Bob's
system to perfection, they can go a long, long way. I think they will this
year. They've shown enough brilliant flashes to convince me that they'll
make a run. I think Bob knows it too.
Could I be wrong ??? Absolutely, but I'll feel comfortable knowing that
I'll still be light years behind a certain Baby Blue Prognosticator in the
Prediction Boo-Boo Department.
Bob Hunt
|
15.865 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Software : Art Of The State | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:03 | 24 |
| Bob, let's not take the heat off of MrT. ACChris will screw quite well
on his own - don't let T divert the heat off of his rather sizeable
arse.
re JD
JD, the Coogs had (H)Akeem, Drexler, Young, et al ... man for man (yes,
down at least 8 deep) - I'd stack the 82-84 UH teams against ANY club
in NCAA history.
However, I (unlike a couple of noters in here) will freely admit that
Guy Lewis was worth about 5 points a game ...
To the opposition. That man couldn't coach a dog to roll over and play
dead ! And I never meant to imply that NC State was talentless. Valvano
was (and is) slime, but he's a good coach. That team and some unreal
outside shooting with Wittenburg, Gannon, Myers, and Lowe. And Thurl
Bailey's NBA career underscores his play in college.
But there is no way in hell they should have been within 10 points of
UH on 8 nights out of 10 (at least).
Doc
|
15.866 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:45 | 27 |
|
Ok /Roach, *reverse*-sandbagging.
And Rolly, say what you will but show me another top ranked team that
only has one big-guy sub, and a guy who received few offers out a H.S.
and has an abject inability to handle the ball or shoot.
Most top teams have several big guys (Zona must clone them).
Knight himself has noted that this team "has gaping holes to be
exploited." He's talking about the fack that Indiana is the only top
30 team in the country who has only three Div. I-A players along the
front-line. They use Nover to spell the three and they suffer for it.
After that they go to a 3-guard lineup.
And, beyond that, of the three front-line guys (Calbert, Alan, Eric)
none is strong physcially in terms of rebounding and defending. If
IU's gonna have a thin front-line they need a Jamal Mashburn type to
even things out a bit and they don't have that.
If Alan plays like he did at OSU they could win the Title. The
slightest letdown and they could get blown out by a 5-seed.
Not so for Duke/Arkansas/Zona/UCLA/etc, cuz they have the pieces to
play with.
MrT
|
15.867 | Reverse-Sandbagging? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 12:57 | 1 |
|
|
15.868 | I agree, IU may underachieve in the NCAAs in 1992. | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | T's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging Agin | Fri Feb 28 1992 13:11 | 9 |
| No doubt about it, T, Indiana has some problems. I never said
they didn't; in fact, in each of these notes I have admitted they do.
I expect good teams to exploit some of those weaknesses if they
can. However, everyone else has weaknesses, too. A lot of these
NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS have a very undisciplined, playground sbrand of
basketball, and the teams depending on athleticism have plenty of
holes, too. If BK has his team prepared, and if he has a good game
plan, IU's superior basketball skills will beat the team that may
have a couple of NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS on the front line.
|
15.869 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 28 1992 13:49 | 29 |
| IU may underachieve?
Well, they've proven they can handle the nukewidebodystud squads last
year when they went down by 18 to FSU and then took over. However,
doing that all depends on whether the shots are falling for a team like
that.
>If BK has his... and if he has a good...
You really do agree: If if if. Too many ifs for them to be second
ranked, much less a money shot at the Cup than, say, Arkansas.
This is cuz there are some nukewideobdystud squads who are NOT
undisciplined or stupidly coached. Meanwhile, the Hoosiers have a
very thin situation up front, and a history for drawing blanks from
the perimeter. They must continue to improve rapidly and have some
luck in the tourney to have any shot at the Final4. My point is that
this needn't be said for several teams ranked behind them.
One other thing: That they're ranked 2nd now doesn't mean they'll be
ranked 2nd going in. They must play at Iowa and Michigan (not to
mention Purdue, talk about heated rivalries) and have some tough games
at home.
Given that they've been either perfect or on the ropes, the Hoosiers
bubble could snap (kinda like strutting one's chest) and they could
lose maybe three games and end up going in ranked 15th.
MrT
|
15.870 | re .867, yeah, I said reverse-sandbaggin so what? | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 28 1992 13:50 | 1 |
|
|
15.871 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | MoVaughn-RogainePosterChild | Fri Feb 28 1992 14:32 | 6 |
| I humbly apologize MrT. I should've realized you know just
about everything regarding sandbagging.
You do so much of it!
/Don
|
15.872 | if that were true I'd agree with joe point! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Fri Feb 28 1992 15:45 | 1 |
|
|
15.873 | I'll takes T's word, IU not coached well enough... | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | T's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging Agin | Fri Feb 28 1992 16:47 | 22 |
| > <<< Note 15.868 by CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R "T's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging Agin" >>>
> -< I agree, IU may underachieve in the NCAAs in 1992. >-
>
> If BK has his team prepared, and if he has a good game
> plan, IU's superior basketball skills will beat the team that may
> have a couple of NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS on the front line.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Note 15.869 Big Ten Basketball 869 of 872
>ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Carolina Blew" 29 lines 28-FEB-1992 13:49
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >If BK has his... and if he has a good...
>
> You really do agree: If if if. Too many ifs for them to be second
> ranked, much less a money shot at the Cup than, say, Arkansas.
Too many ifs (count em, 2) to be second ranked. I guess T is saying that
it's really questionable as to whether Bob can really prepare his team
AND have a good game plan, both at the same time against a good team in
the NCAAs. Seems to me that's the only qualifications I put on the win,
but T says thats Too many ifs. I guess he'd know, however.
|
15.874 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 02 1992 10:29 | 25 |
|
> Let me get this straight. When comparing two (2) coaches it's more
> fair to use NCAA Tournament results (defined as 'Number of Times They
> Reached The Final 4') than head-to-head results.
NCAA tournament results (times to the Final 4, Final 8, whatever; with
emphasis placed on championships won) are more "fair" and definitive
than head-to-head results in the regular season. NCAA tournament play
is almost universally recognized as the goal and of the highest caliber
in college basketball. I'm sure you can come up with all sorts of
strange results using head-to-head comparisons between all the coaches
in college basketball, or even within a conference (like Bob Knight's
troubles with Gene Keady, for example).
Given the statistical uncertainty of the results in any single year
(not over a 30-year period, for example), I'd say that Indiana is
underachieving if they fail to reach the Final 16, is a disappointment
if they fail to reach the Final 8, and a success if they reach the
Final 4. There are too many teams at a very close level this year to
expect much more than that from any team (again, with the possible
exception of the defending champs)...
glenn
|
15.875 | this week is it | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Mar 02 1992 12:57 | 22 |
| A_enigmatic performance by the Hoosiers at home against the undermanned
Illini. Outrebounded by 10, they have a 22 point lead with 6 minutes
to go and it turns into a nailbiter. Sloppy defensive play by the guards
against the trey late.
The good news is that Calbert continues on his tear, Alan has settled
into a groove in the middle, and Eric ACTUALLY hit 4 of 8 jump shots!
It's Title Week for the Hoosiers. Noted biased-Hoosier-sandbaggers
Bill Walton and Ted Robinson spoke at length about IU's weakness
defensively inside - the lack a a true center and front-line depth and
front-line muscle.
Robinson wondered what Bob could do against a team with the big main
and Bill correctly observed, "we'll find out this week, the Hoosiers
are going to visit Acie Earl and then Chris Webber."
Right he is. We'll finally see what the Hoosiers are made of this
week. And don't forget they finish up at that snakepit Mackey Arena,
which is no gimme.
MrT
|
15.876 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 02 1992 13:12 | 2 |
| Who cares about how the Loosiers played. How was our commercial?!!
denny
|
15.877 | wondering when somebody would axe... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:29 | 5 |
| Bob's Pizza Hut campaign has been running for a few weeks now.
IMNSHO it's a danged fine commercial!
MrT
|
15.878 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RogerWatch-Day10 | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:34 | 5 |
| You have to give Bob credit where credit is due. Although he
was tempted, he *didn't* throw a chair yesterday. Congrats Bob
on showing such restraint.
/Don
|
15.879 | How about DEC ad? | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:43 | 2 |
| Isn't Boob selling Dominos pizza?
Denny
|
15.880 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RogerWatch-Day10 | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:46 | 4 |
| Yeah I thought it was Dominos too. Pizza Hut puts out a quality
product. Dominos pizza tastes like sauce and cheese on a tree bark.
/Don
|
15.881 | Papa Gino's Rooles!!!!!! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:55 | 1 |
|
|
15.882 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 02 1992 15:56 | 3 |
| That's because the hot rodders that deliver it have to store it in
the car's engine compartment ta keep it warm!
Denny
|
15.883 | Pizza Hut is better | FRETZ::HEISER | stop making sense! | Mon Mar 02 1992 16:25 | 4 |
| It looks like Bobby has been sampling a few too many from his new
employer.
Mike
|
15.884 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Mon Mar 02 1992 16:59 | 5 |
| Trivia Question:
Why didn't Bob throw the chair yesterday?
WILDCAT
|
15.885 | Won't go far now | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Mar 02 1992 18:15 | 13 |
|
Trivia Question:
Why didn't Bob throw the chair yesterday?
Correct answer: He's much too much a fine and upstanding citizen
to do such a thing (again).
Answer you're probably looking for: The chairs are now tied down;
have been for, oh, about 7 years now.
tom
|
15.886 | They weren't playing Perdue? | RAVEN1::TURNER | A'64ToplessTripower4-SpeedGTOtogo! | Mon Mar 02 1992 18:24 | 1 |
| Bad Back?
|
15.887 | 14 down, 4 to go; 3 to tie, 4 to win | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Mar 02 1992 18:26 | 21 |
| Hoosiers played another of their far too frequent 10 minute games
yesterday. For that 10 minutes, they looked as good as any team I've seen
this year. For the other 30, they looked more like #52 than #2.
Cheaney continues to play well, but the real story on the good news
side is Alan Henderson. Not sure how this idea that he wasn't aggressive
got started his senior year in high school, but those responsible should never
be allowed to comment on high school players again. Henderson, right now, is
as tenacious on the boards and defensively as anyone who's played for IU in
years.
The bad news side is the guard play. Since he's been inserted in the
lineup Greg Graham seems to be becoming steadily less effective shooting the
ball, Bailey gets more chances to go one-on-one(this is bad), Reynolds has been
ineffective coming off the bench, and Meeks seems confused in what's become
limited playing time. I know it's tough to keep the guy who's playing best
for you in a sixth-man role, but I wish they had.
Next up: Wednesday at Iowa. Always a tough place to play.
tom
|
15.888 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Mon Mar 02 1992 22:32 | 28 |
| You have it right, Tom. The Hoosiers need two things to happen
going into the meaningless-end-a-season-peak time:
1) GGraham to rediscover his outside J.
2) Eric Anderson to rediscover his outside J.
Ya gotta figure Alan will continue to progress, Calbert will continue
to roll, and that the inconsistent shooting of Damon and the rest is
inherent in the squad. Ditto for the sometimes laggardly guard defense
on the ball and the alway suspect inside D and rebounding.
But no way cain they have a shot at a regional title without one good
shootin guad and a finesse forward who's their biggest guy wihtout the
shot that carried him for 3 years.
Iowa, then Michigan, then Purdue. Three tough road games. We'll see
what they're made of.
One thing I like is watching all these Almost Close and Big Least games
and they're reduced to talking about the joy over winning the "regular
season conference championsip."
At least we have something substantive to shoot for, win or lose.
Bring 'em on!
MrT
|
15.889 | fire fisher before the tournament... | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Wed Mar 04 1992 08:59 | 28 |
| Michigan played well for much of the game last night at Columbus,
but in the end, they couldn't finish it off once again. They were up
by 5 with about 5 minutes left, and they proceded to throw the ball
away three times in a row for 3 OSU breakaways. OSU coasted from there.
Fisher continues to show no control over this team. He just lets them
play. If they're hot, as they were at Iowa, then this strategy does
allright. But it does not cut in in the close games. The three turn
overs happened in about one minutes time. Fisher should have stepped
in to get some control before they let it slip away. Fisher did get
mad (first time I've seen it) arguing a substitution call, I was hoping
he'd get tossed and let Watson coach the team.
Anyway, it was exciting as usual. Webber had a 360 breakaway jam. Ray
Jackson played well in the first half, he had a pretty alley-oop, and
some nice rebounds. This guy is quite an athelete. Rose was ice cold,
he must have missed close to 10 3 pointers. But he did have some nice
passes. Both Webber and Howard were posting up and passing nicely.
I'm hoping Howard finds his shooting touch again for the IU game. He
does a nice job of posting up, but he's been missing of late.
I'll stick with my original prediction, UM over IU sunday. I think
Indiana will win tonight, and end up tied with OSU for the big ten and
get the number 1 seed.
-dennis
|
15.890 | wish I could've watched this game | OLDTMR::RACZKA | sweet and saxy | Wed Mar 04 1992 10:58 | 10 |
| RE: .889
dennis,
Thanks for the update ... what was the final score ??
I too believe that Perry Watson will replace Fisher at
some point
chris
|
15.891 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew? They SUCKED! | Wed Mar 04 1992 11:14 | 11 |
| Why does everybody underrate Iowa so? They're ranked 40th! They could
beat up a dozen a the squads ranked over them.
On Ohio State: JJ showed his "G" string last night. What'd he git,
13 rebounds? What a player. Didn't see the game but the key, I think,
is whether the Buckeyes ran a organized offense. If and when they
start doing that with consistency they've got a shot at the Title,
and are still on the inside track for at least a tie for the Big10
Title.
MrT
|
15.892 | | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Wed Mar 04 1992 13:04 | 5 |
| Michigan ended up losing by 10 I think. JJ was superb, numerous
jump shots with defenders right in his face -- he is a class
act all the way, he'd be a great choice for the Olympic team.
|
15.893 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew? They SUCKED! | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:05 | 5 |
| IU vs. Iowa ain't on the boob tube tonight. Bah. Everybody's
skeert a Acie. No, they ain't skeert a Acie's tri-level hair-do,
it's his inside game that has all a Hoosierdom fretting!
MrT
|
15.894 | Just like on their journey to the Final 8 | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:14 | 6 |
|
I predict that the Hoosiers will win with room to spare but their lack
of an inside game will be horribly exposed nonetheless...
glenn
|
15.895 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew? They SUCKED! | Wed Mar 04 1992 16:27 | 9 |
| Chris Street has been coming on up front. And you never know whether
Moses is gonna uncork one a his unconscious perfmances. They've got
that lightning quick little guard (Jackson?), but he's been spotty.
Hope Dr. Malpractice commits everything to that stoopid full-court
press, which the quick Hoosiers should go over 'round and thru with
much impunity.
MrT
|
15.896 | 15 down, 3 to go; 2 to tie, 3 to win | HANEY::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Mar 04 1992 22:38 | 26 |
|
Gutty performance by the Hoosiers tonight in Carver-Hawkeye to hold
on to a 64-60 win. IU trailed 10-2 early but closed the gap quickly and it
stayed pretty much even the rest of the way. 36-33 Iowa at the half, but
after the lead moved to 5 on the first play of the second half Cheaney scored
a quick 8 points to bring the Hoosiers back to even, where it pretty much
stayed till the final 3 minutes. Cheaney left the game with 4 fouls with
about 11 minutes left, but Greg Graham stepped up big-time and was the
difference the rest of the way. He had 14, all in the second half.
Cheaney finished with 29 on 13-17 shooting. The rest of the team was
something like 12-39 from the field. Acie Earl was a force defensively,
but pretty much a non-factor offensively. Iowa did the majority of their
damage outside, with 7 3s. Eric Anderson may have disappeared on the
offensive end, but he's become a force on the defensive end. 12 boards
tonight, and exceptional defense on Earl. Saw an article that said in
the 7 games leading up to the second Illinois game, Anderson had the defensive
assignment on Peplowski(twice), Deon Thomas, Earl, Bob Martin, Kevin Rankin,
and Lawrence Funderburke. He's smaller than all of them, and their average
production was something like 11 points, 6 rebounds, and 40 percent shooting.
Don't know if he can hold up through the next 3 then the tournament, but he's
been a real force defensively for (at least) 9 games in a row.
Next up: Michigan on Sunday in Ann Arbor. Another tough challenge.
tom
|
15.897 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | Beano:PreventGasBeforeItStarts | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:34 | 12 |
| OK IU hoots,
Give me yo thoughts the Hoosier-Baby Wolverine matchup on Sunday.
Will Chris Webber tear IU's frontcourt a new a#$hole? How bout
Juwan? I watched the earlier matchup at SnakepitU and Michigan
looked downright scary at times. Cain these still_wet_behind_their_
ears 'rines pull off a 5-10 pt win? Or will IU's outside shooting
and Cheaney's matured athleticism make the infants wish they were
wearing Depends ?? Be honest dudes ( especially you T 8^)).
Inquiring gray matter and all that rot,
MikeL
|
15.898 | New technique for Pay-Per-W | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Mar 06 1992 11:48 | 14 |
| Seems Big10 member Wisconsin contacted Georgia State coach Bob
Reinhart about one_a_them payoff games next year. The Badgers were
offering $18K for Reinhart to bring his Panthers to Madison next
season. (i.e. Buy_a_W)
Reinhart turned down the 18 grand, but did offer a different policy.
He said they'd play for $1,000 p/ point. If Wisconsin beats Georgia
State by, say, 50, they owe 'em 50 grand. If GSU beats Wisconsin, they
owe nothing.
Sounded reasonable to me, but Wisconsin hasn't gotten back to him.
- ACC Chris
|
15.899 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | You are incapable of shame | Fri Mar 06 1992 12:59 | 20 |
| Crocker, did you know that ALL visiting teams get paid to appear?
And YOU are hardly in a position to be bleating about "buy_a_W"
after "your" Star Hells cupcake gorging jag this year.
re: Iowa game
Huge win for the Hoosiers. This should position them for hopefully
at least a share. It also enhances their chances at Crisler given
the confidence building that should flow from it.
Did I hear that Eric played center and checked Acie all the way? His
floor game (blocks, inside D, even rebounding) has flourished the past
month, and he's even avoiding foul trouble.
Again, we'll see how viable this set-up is against the Fab5 on Sunday.
Plenty a big guys to test oneself against.
The Hoosiers win at Michigan they win the Big10. Bring 'em on !!
MrT
|
15.900 | | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Mar 06 1992 13:44 | 19 |
| re: .-1
You tellin' me ALL visiting teams get offered 18K to appear? I doubt
it.
Anyway this type of Pay-Per-Win is commonplace and fair. Why shouldn't
the "haves" (i.e. schools bringing in megabucks) share with the
"have-nots", specially when you consider the opposition has every right
to share gate receipts. (Even if everybody is payin' to watch 'em get
slaughtered, kinda like the team the Globetrotters used to play ...)
BTW, Georgia State ain't that bad. They made the NCAA's last year (got
absolutely keeled by Arkansas in the first round). They've got a kid
named Luckydoo who may be an NBA prospect. Course he's graduating this
year, which is no_doubt why the Badgers felt bold enough to invite 'em
up for a win.
- ACC Chris
|
15.901 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | You are incapable of shame | Fri Mar 06 1992 15:41 | 4 |
| So now paying a team is routine and GSU ain't all that bad. We'll
just assume you were only kidding first time 'round on this...
MrT
|
15.902 | Truth and I are old company. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:08 | 5 |
| Kidding about what? I was reporting the truth, something I realize is
a foreign commodity to U.
- ACC Chris
|
15.903 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | You are incapable of shame | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:21 | 10 |
| You backed of. You said UW was buying a W, then, when challenged
by a big strong dude making a point, you backed down and abjectly
admitted that everybody gets paid and GSU could probably beat UW
anyway.
I.e., you were kidding? Or is it, in saying that you weren't kidding,
you are for the first time in joe life finally admitting that you were
WRONG?
MrT
|
15.904 | Wrong? Not likely ... | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:35 | 9 |
| > You said UW was buying a W
True, but you're overly sensitive Bigot10 persona naturally assumed
that this implied a criticism.
Not so.
- ACC Chris
|
15.905 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:41 | 15 |
|
>> You said UW was buying a W
> True, but you're overly sensitive Bigot10 persona naturally assumed
> that this implied a criticism.
> Not so.
That's the way I read it, too, Chris, based on your astonishment over
the amount of the dollar figure (which isn't really all that much) and
the way you presented Wisconsin's non-response to what amounted to an
illegal wager...
glenn
|
15.906 | Astonished? Hardly. | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Fri Mar 06 1992 16:46 | 7 |
| I wasn't astonished at the 18K glenn. Only that MrT equated that 18
thousand with the normal amount that a visiting team gets. I doubt
very much that Wisconsin would pay, say, Duke University $18,000 to
play a game on their home floor.
- ACC Chris
|
15.907 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | You are incapable of shame | Sat Mar 07 1992 13:39 | 7 |
| I disagree. I think UW would gladly pay Duke eighteen grand to
come up and play.
Spin control it however you like, but you backed down after making
a false claim, and that's good.
MrT
|
15.908 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Sun Mar 08 1992 16:47 | 13 |
| re: .899
Yo T-man, Michigan was brought on and wupped Indiana's butt. Hell of a
coaching job by whats that guys name at IU?? Anyway they were pretty
much outplayed in every phase of the game, in addition to not being
able to buy a basket for minutes at a time. A very enjoyable game if I
do say so.
Will be interesting to see if IU or OSU get a #1 seed in the NCAA
tournament.
The Crazy Met
|
15.909 | go blue! | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Mon Mar 09 1992 09:11 | 26 |
| Great Win for the Wolverines!
Michigan came out hot but they let Indiana back into it. Actually
I think Indiana did a good job of pushing Webber and Howard further
out on the post. Great game from Jimmy King especially with the much
needed offense in the first half, and a great all round effort from
Webber. Webber is going to be All American, he's got all the tools.
UM was letting things slip away at the end of the first, then they came
out ice-cold in the second half. Credit to Fisher and the boys for
coming back after being down. I wasn't feeling too comfortable when
they fell behind. But they finally started hitting again, and we're
able to hang on. Indiana could not hit a free throw at the end, I think
Knight will be talking to his boys about that.
Of course the play of the game was the alley oop from Howard to Webber
at the start of the game, just like old times... when they were beating
up on the cupcakes at the start of the year, Michigan was getting a few
of these every game.
This should wrap up a tournament bid. I'm afraid they won't get too
far this year, but its just great to see them back in it. They've got
the potential to beat anyone on a given day, but I can't see them winning
3 in a row.
-dennis
|
15.910 | | 57112::ASHE | Sometimes you're a windshield... | Mon Mar 09 1992 12:25 | 1 |
| Send them to Worcester!!!
|
15.911 | | 6984::CHILDS | Four Tops >> Temptations | Mon Mar 09 1992 12:52 | 6 |
|
sure send em. given a choice I'd rather have OSU come to worcester so I
can see JJ in person....then of course the General again. Maybe we'll get
lucky and get two Big Ten teams here. We always get atleast one.
mike
|
15.912 | A few thoughts on tourney time | 28922::QUINN_R | | Mon Mar 09 1992 23:19 | 41 |
| Send the wolve's to the Southeast. I say them play a few years back
at the omni when the had Grant, Tarpley and a frosh by the
name of Rice. Packer mentioned it Sunday and it may be due to being so
young. The UM players appear to be much more focused for games that
have been built of over time. You can't really count on it but the
ncaa tourney can't be an ultimate buildup. Isn't coach Steve
undefeated in the "Big Dance"???
Tourney Possibilities:
IU -- History says all the way or out early(Round 2). Achilles heel
outside shooting not size. Its been proven you can win without
size. When the outside shooting is on the efficiency to way up.
OSU -- Recent history has yielded poor results. Well coached but poor
timing. They always appear to peak before the tourney.
Execution and someone to step forward along with JJ to get them
to the final 4.
MSU -- Jud seems to do better when he is least expected to do so.
Along with Minnesota history says they overachieve in the
tourney. Final eight with a good seed and the right bracket.
Shot selection and Stieninga(sp?) are keys.
UM -- I hope they watch the tapes of the last UM trip to the big dance.
Young but so was Duke when they made the trip to the final 4 the
last 2 years. Great potential this year could be just a learning
experience.
Iowa -- For their talent level they could get to the sweet sixteen.
Dr. Tom has blown a few. The press is great if you have
shooters his has been suspect. Earl could be a factor.
Minn -- NO tourney lock for sure-- big bubble may be burst by the end
of the weekend. If they get in look out. Consistent
overachiever. Seton Hall like if you will. Good D no great
shooting but they don't let you shoot well either.
Bring on the DANCE !!!!!!!!!!!
Roy
|
15.913 | for thos who haven't guessed, toungue-in-cheek | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Mar 10 1992 10:32 | 15 |
| This morning I fell like a disappointed puppy. Let me explain.
Yesterday I got in to this notesfile expecting to see at least a 50
line post from the T-man about the Indiana-Michigan game on Sunday. In
it I expected to at least read how IU was really playing at the level
they should be playing and how they have overachieved all season. The
clincher would be the line that THAT COACH (hereafter known as TC) was
a genius for managing to keep his team within 10 points of the awesome
Wolverines. Alas, yesterday there was no note. So I figure give T-man
one more day, since this note would be a tough task even for a man of
his eloquence and verbosity. But here it is a day later and still no
note. T-man is beginning to behave like some ACC fellow. Sigh, is
nothing sacred anymore.
The Crazy (and disappointed) Met
|
15.914 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 10 1992 11:07 | 27 |
| re 2
Size matters when you give up 15 offensive rebounds. A lot. It also
matters in terms of your shooting percentage if you're going up against
a relatively quick 6-8 guard and the front-line sizeable fellows are
all cat-quick too.
re 1
I couldn't get into this file yesterday AM ("node unreachable") and was
in meetings the remainder a the day.
I'll say this now, though: Bob has done a masterful job a keeping his
team at or near peak efficiency through motivation, player development,
game preparation, game coaching, and so on. But they blew the game by
shooting miserably even when they had the open Js, and nailed their own
coffin by missing four straight front-ends of 1-and-1s down the stretch.
Bob cain only do so much. He cain't play the games for them.
Good news: Alan Henderson has served notice that he should be first
team All-Frosh. Bad news: Eric's awful shooting continues unabated,
and Damon must be the most inconistent player in the country.
Poor MrT
|
15.915 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Mar 10 1992 13:14 | 4 |
| Thanks t-man I'll sleep better tonight.
The Crazy Met
|
15.916 | | GOOEY::MCEVOY | | Wed Mar 11 1992 15:41 | 2 |
| you have to give Knight his due; give that team to Fisher or Henson and
they'd be down there fighting with Illinios.
|
15.917 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Mar 11 1992 18:39 | 7 |
| re: .916
I knew someone would say somethin like that eventualy. Just thought
that t-man would be the first.
The Crazy Met
|
15.918 | Slim Pickens must wins Sunday | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Mar 12 1992 09:13 | 3 |
|
Woe is Minny!!!! Big Dance sliding away. Boilers bidding ado(sp) as well.
|
15.919 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 12 1992 12:21 | 6 |
| Looks like both Minny and Purdue are tap city. Maybe Purdue cain
nudge in by chumping the undermanned Hoosiers at Mackey Sunday.
Five Big10 squads to the tourney.
MrT
|
15.920 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | | Thu Mar 12 1992 12:33 | 5 |
| I'll bet that either Minnesota or Purdue will make the dance
and it wouldn't surprise me if they both did. Undermanned Hoosiers?
HAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHEEHEEHEEHEE!!!
/Don
|
15.921 | 16 down, 2 to go | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Mar 12 1992 18:36 | 28 |
|
A few comments from Knight after the IU-Michigan game:
"We aren't going to beat anybody shooting like that. But there's a
difference between shooting and playing, and I thought we played pretty well."
"We've not shot very well for a couple of ball games now. I don't
particularly like to have a team that is to a considerable degree dependent on
shooting --- but we are. And we've got to shoot well to win. In the Iowa game,
excepting Cheaney, we shot 12 out of 42. And if we take Henderson out of the
game today, we're 13 of 44 and we're not going to win with that kind of
shooting."
The light at the end of the tunnel in the Michigan game was that the
Hoosiers we're able to come back from 16 down on the road. Other than that, it
was very forgettable. Indiana's now lost 3 Big Ten games; Bailey's scored a
total of 0 points in the three games. Anderson and Cheaney were both 3-13
against Michigan. Cheaney's understandable because of the flu, but Anderson��
needs to be able to score some to take pressure off the other players, and he's
just not getting it done. This is a real good team when it's on, but I'm not
sure how many games into the tournament it'll be before they have another
shooting disaster. Maybe 7 :^)
Wisconsin in Bloomington tonight, then Purdue in West Lafayette on
Sunday. It will probably take 2 wins to tie for the conference championship.
tom
|
15.922 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | | Fri Mar 13 1992 08:27 | 1 |
| Congats on po' undermanned IU beating NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDLY� Wisconsin.
|
15.923 | a bad win | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Mar 13 1992 09:44 | 7 |
| A disquieting win for the Hoosiers against the lowly Badgers. They're
at home in a must win game against a weak team not exackally revered
for its defensive prowess... and they shoot for the lowest percentage
in team history. They pull anything approaching that against Mene
Gene's minions in Mackey and they're daid-meat.
MrT
|
15.924 | C'mere, sis, osculate me ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Virginia -- 1992 ACC Women's Hoops Champs | Fri Mar 13 1992 09:46 | 7 |
| Gosh, the suspense in the Big Ten is just killing me.
After all these many months, we might have two teams with equal records
sharing the conference title. Oh, what tension !!! How can you stand
it ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.925 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Mar 13 1992 11:33 | 8 |
|
A tie is a perfectly acceptable result in a fair and equitable
competition. Unless, of course, you prefer the ACC/BigEast/Big8
equivalent: throw out the results of the competition, tie or no,
and let them shoot penalty kicks!
glenn
|
15.926 | | 34873::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Mar 13 1992 15:42 | 12 |
| re .924
Witch, apparently you cain no longer fathom wending your way through
a 2 1/2 month comptetion. That's your loss.
Enjoy your phony redundant money-grubbing weekend spectacle (which you
say THRILLS you so); just remember that what happened the previous
three months is, how you say, a_exhibition season.
What made-for-TV crap it all it.
MrT
|
15.927 | Go Eastern Illinois!! | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:15 | 6 |
| Big time choke for Indiana yesterday. They had the lead and a #1 seed
playing near home in hand but couldn't winb the game. A satisfying
SUnday.
The Crazy Met
|
15.928 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorr | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:27 | 26 |
| A not particularly surprising loss. A tough rivalry against a tough
coach in a snakepit a a arena.
As the announcers gushed about how Craig Riley was the key cuz a his
inside offense and widebody I had to laugh at the sandbagging I've
been abused with over the years from that reprehensible manipulator
Doug Ross (Purdue alum and ex-Big10 main).
Indiana is surely one a the worst shooting teams in the nation. I
never saw so many wide open squared-up mid-range jumpers missed. Check
that, I've seen as many missed in several other Indiana games. But
when they're going up against a team with some inside presence they
cain't fall back on the drive-for-fouls tactic and they lose.
The Hoosiers are a small, poor shooting team. They should lose in a
blowout to LSU in the 2nd round. Shack will be on a mission and the
centerless Hoosiers lack a depth along the front-line will pay. Their
only hope is the extra-dumb Dale Brown.
Yesterday's loss hurts most cuz it cost a Big10 Title, something
Indiana may not again be in a position to win for some years. It also
hurts cuz it was Purdue. The seeding and the NCAA was beside the
point, cuz they don't have the horses to make a serious run at the
thing.
MrT
|
15.929 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Go Fordham Rams! | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:32 | 8 |
| I tell ya one thing, Nick Anderson better find his shot, or the
Hoosiers are home early. He clanged big time yesterday. Henderson
looked and played like a frosh. Lets hope that he got his bad game out
of his system.
Could see the Shack vs. the Hoosiers in the 2nd round...
JD
|
15.930 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorr | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:39 | 27 |
|
Eric Anderson hasn't been able to shoot all season. I think maybe
Alan was a bit intimidated by the game (a really big rivalry) and
the rough play. Wait till he gets a load a Shack.
Indiana has one shooter in Calbert. After that their next best
shooter is Greg Graham, who was known for his bricklaying prowess
even as an all-state prepster. Alan cain shoot some, at least he has
lately.
Then you have the total abject non-shooters, talented players with
no J at all: Chris Reynolds, Jamaal Meeks, and Damon Bailey. I'd
include the awful Matt Nover here but he has no talent.
The injury to sharp-shooter Pat Graham was more costly than imagined.
They'll be better next year with him and Pat Knight and Brian Evans,
who apparently cain shoot some.
I think the Hoosiers need to run more and slash inside more on the
halfcourt offense. Their outside shooting is nearly hopeless.
They had a good season but missed their shot at the Title when they
lost at Gophers.
MrT(ears)
|
15.931 | If we put T's nonsense aside and look at the truth | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:54 | 34 |
| First Round:
#2 Indiana 23-6 #15 Eastern Illinois 17-13
--------------- --------------------------
C Eric Anderson 6-9 Sr 10.5 ppg C Curtis Leib 6-7 So 8.6 ppg
F Alan Henderson 6-9 Fr 11.1 ppg F Barry Johnson 6-7 Sr 14.0 ppg
F Calbert Cheaney 6-6 Jr 17.5 ppg F Dave Olson 6-6 Sr 11.3 ppg
G Chris Reynolds 6-1 Jr 4.5 ppg G Kavin Martin 6-3 Sr 4.6 ppg
G Damon Bailey 6-3 So 12.2 ppg G Steve Rowe 6-2 Sr 15.0 ppg
Second Round Possibilities:
#2 Indiana 23-6 #7 Louisiana State 20-9
--------------- -----------------------
C Eric Anderson 6-9 Sr 10.5 ppg C Shaquille O'Neal 7-1 Jr 23.9 ppg
F Alan Henderson 6-9 Fr 11.1 ppg F Clarence Ceasar 6-7 Fr 11.7 ppg
F Calbert Cheaney 6-6 Jr 17.5 ppg F Vernel Singleton 6-7 Sr 14.6 ppg
G Chris Reynolds 6-1 Jr 4.5 ppg G Jamie Brandon 6-4 So 11.0 ppg
G Damon Bailey 6-3 So 12.2 ppg G Maurice Williamsn 6-0 Jr 7.3 ppg
#2 Indiana 23-6 #10 Brigham Young 25-6
--------------- ----------------------
C Eric Anderson 6-9 Sr 10.5 ppg C Gary Trost 6-10 Jr 14.5 ppg
F Alan Henderson 6-9 Fr 11.1 ppg F Kevin Nixon 6-9 Jr 11.4 ppg
F Calbert Cheaney 6-6 Jr 17.5 ppg F Jared Miller 6-8 Jr 7.4 ppg
G Chris Reynolds 6-1 Jr 4.5 ppg G Nathan Call 5-11 Sr 9.3 ppg
G Damon Bailey 6-3 So 12.2 ppg G Mark Helsop 6-5 Sr 9.7 ppg
The truth is, Indiana should beat EIU and either LSU or BYU. LSU's only
area in which they are stronger is at center. The IU forwards and guards
match up favorably to LSU's, and IU is deeper than the Tigers.
If a person really looks at the matchups, IU would be underachieveing if they
don't get to the Western Regional finals.
|
15.932 | Brown is a 100% bonafide idiot. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 11:03 | 13 |
| re: LSU vs. Bob
This is one game where I'd like to see:
o IU clock LSU
o Bob clock Dale Brown.
Is there any doubt whatsoever that Dale Brown is the biggest jerk in
college coaching? Not in my book ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.933 | IU Chokes #1 seed away..... | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Mar 16 1992 11:21 | 12 |
| Indiana choked big time yesterday... No way they should have lost to
that Purdue squad. They better break out of this shooting slump soon.
IU should make the sweet 16, if they shoot over 50% they have a shot
at another title this year. Anything less and they are history...
I didn't get to see the game as I was center court in the Gahden to
see another installment of Larry's Legends. What a great experience.
I wouldn't want to be at this week's practices, maybe this loss will
give them a shot in the arm....
|
15.934 | Depressing, VERY depressing | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Mar 16 1992 11:57 | 19 |
|
Unfortunately, and most disturbingly for Indiana's chances in the
tournament, yesterday's loss at Purdue WASN'T a choke. They played exactly
the same way they've played essentially every game since the second Ohio
State game. No outside shooting at all, and no ability to shut a team down
with the game on the line.
The Hoosiers should handle Eastern Illinois, but the only way they beat
LSU is if the outside shooting makes a (miraculous) comeback. If they can't
handle Craig Riley on the defensive end, they don't have a prayer against
Shaquille. And even as bad a coach as Brown will figure out that he can just
pack it in to keep Shaq out of foul trouble.
Interesting that IU and LSU are once again in the same bracket. The
NCAA's been trying to give CBS this matchup pretty much every year since the
'87 tournament controversy. Looks like they may have finally succeeded, unless
the Hoosiers get lucky and LSU looks past BYU.
tom
|
15.935 | Some constant themes year-to-year in NCAA Tourney ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 12:09 | 16 |
| re: .-1
What's this, MrObjectiveAnalysis Cap, who can brilliantly second guess
a HoFer, erred saying Indiana "choked"? (Despite his own admission
that he didn't see the game.) Cain't belive it.
re: IU vs. LSU
It's amazing to me the trends that take place year to year with the
brackets. Carolina has gone to the Southeast to play either Michigan
or Alabama at least 5 times since the early 80's. It's almost like
they use a template to put the brackets together ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.936 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorr | Mon Mar 16 1992 12:19 | 30 |
| re .931
I'll just go ahaid and agree with any number of commentators on the
Hoosiers' apparent lineup weakness: They don't have a center, they
don't have a single physcial front-line player, and they only have
3 bigtime college front-liners, and have only one front-line subsitute.
This has been gone over again and again. It's even in the summary in
today's Mpls. paper, "poor shooting and weak inside."
I'm sure you're right and everybody's wrong, Rolly, but it was plenty
apparent how Indiana managed to give up 12 offensive rebounds to
Michigan.
There's more to a player than his height: weight, quickness of jump,
height of jump, quickness, speed, muscle, and so on.
IU has one great player on its squad, the small fwd Calbert Cheaney.
Then they have a 190 lb superfrosh at big fwd, and a slow no-shot
no-jump fwd playing center with his back to the basket who everybody
knows is only halfway effective facing the basket.
They have no effective sub up front.
The Hoosiers are a small, poor shooting team. A deadly combination,
and certainly not a #4 squad that'll roll over Shaquille, who could
block 12 shots and change several and grab 20 boards and, most
important, get Indiana's shallow front-line in early foul trouble.
MrT
|
15.937 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Pinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorr | Mon Mar 16 1992 12:33 | 17 |
| Interesting point, tom: The standard strategy against Shack is to foul
the hell out a him. Indiana has lotsa fouls to give from the guard
position, but no fouls to give from the front-line.
The only positive I took from yesterday's (Big10 Title) loss was that
Eric was able to play the brutish Craig Riley for a full game that was
very rough and not, as he had in the past, ended up in early foul
trouble.
You gotta figure he's gonna get in early foul trouble against Shack
and hit the pine with about 10 minutes left in the first half (this
was the pattern for Eric up till this year)... and then you've got
Matt Nover vs. Shack - The Matchup From Hell!
8^o
MrT
|
15.938 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Mar 16 1992 12:50 | 24 |
| >What's this, MrObjectiveAnalysis Cap, who can brilliantly second guess
>a HoFer, erred saying Indiana "choked"? (Despite his own admission
>that he didn't see the game.) Cain't belive it.
This is from the same guy who can second guess a HOFer(Knight) but is
aghast when anyone question's Dean Smith(including experts).
Yes IU choked away the Big10 title after being in the driver's seat.
They should have beaten both Minnesota and Purdue but clearly were
not focused to do so....
This is a team that has a huge problem, without an inside presence,
they have to shoot perfectly from the outside to win ballgames. Knight
has done a great job in perfecting the offense so that they have
makeable 12-15 footers, unfortunately they have not hit the shots.
IU is a well-coached team right now(as shown by their strong defensive
efforts and minimal offensive mistakes) and could make a strong title run
if they hit their shots.
NC however showed strong signs of being a poorly coached team in their
recent 3-6 showing(Terrible defensive effort, huge turnover #'s, etc.)
Clearly their season must be deemed a disappointment....
|
15.939 | Commentators agree: Both IU and UNC have severe weaknesses. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:19 | 12 |
| Ah yes, here we have more B-grade Objective Analytical work by Mr. Cap.
IU loses the B10 Title yesterday yet Knight has an extraordinarily
well-coached team. Carolina plays its guts out over the weekend,
knocking off Wake and Florida State before falling to what can only
be described as an awesome Duke squad and our season's a huge
disapointment. Presumably you consider Indiana's season a success.
Keep it up (!), and while you're at it, how 'bout some Objective Analysis
about all of Dean's horrid coaching moves during yesterdays Duke game?
- ACC Chris
|
15.940 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:24 | 26 |
| >Yes IU choked away the Big10 title after being inthe driver's seat.
I don't buy it. They seemed to be in the driver's seat only cuz
they played such a pud 1st half, i.e., all their tough games at home.
They lost to Minny cuz the Golden Goofs play very tough defense from
the guard position, and with big guards of the type who send Damon
to the bench pronto. And it's in a noisy snakepit.
They lost to Purdue cuz the Spoilermakers cuz they have the big inside
presence and play an offense nearly as optimized as Bob's. And it's in
a noisy snakepit.
Four league losses with this squad is plenty good. They didn't choke
so much as begin playing the tough road games after game nine. When
you have the paucity a permiter power that these guys have shooting
under 40% from the field is to be expected.
When they were up by 10 I called it, figuring that it was only a matter
a time before that great little guard Woddy Austin caught fire. He
did, and that was that.
The only good news for me this weekend was learning that I'm in Executive
Suite #117 for the Final4...
MrT
|
15.941 | UNC :== Major Disappointment (Outside Chapel Hill) | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:33 | 12 |
| � Carolina plays its guts out over the weekend, knocking off Wake and
� Florida State before falling to what can only be described as an awesome
� Duke squad and our season's a huge disapointment.
So where was Carolina ranked in the pre-season polls ??? No. 20 ???
Not. No. 16 ??? Not. Were they slated for a 9-7, 3rd place finish in
the ACC ??? Not. Were they predicted to lose 5 out of their final 6
conference games ??? Not.
Was the Fab Five (Minus 1) supposed to do better than this ??? Way.
Bob Hunt
|
15.942 | please, do not /Roach out on me | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:46 | 5 |
| re 1
Excuse me again, buddy, but your p_name is out a specification.
MrT
|
15.943 | Most important games still lie ahead folks ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:53 | 19 |
| Never said this years Carolina team was a huge success (though compared
to the results of your beloved Wahoos I'd certainly put it in that
context). Fack is, this team played pretty darn well except for a
horrid two (2) week stretch in February, during which they had the
misfortune to close out the season with 5 outa 7 games on the road.
For a young team like Carolina, that proved to be too much. Confidence
waned and the results were predictably disasterous. To their credit
though, they've gotten off the mat to win 3 out 5. (Both L's coming to
Duke.)
As to preseason expectations, I look no further than your soul mate
Doug Ross, who correctly pointed out how incredibly slow and
un-talented UNC was this year. He went so far as to say the 20-win
streak would die, the Top 20 finishes would end, and the Sweet 16
streak would extinguish. Based on his metrics you'd have to say Dean
has overachieved nicely to this point.
- ACC Chris
|
15.944 | C'mon, T, I'm paying it off ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 16 1992 13:58 | 7 |
| � Excuse me again, buddy, but your p_name is out a specification.
What're you babbling about now ??? I changed it to the required payoff
string an hour or so ago ...
Bob Hunt
|
15.945 | Bah (continued) ... | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:08 | 25 |
| � context). Fack is, this team played pretty darn well except for a
� horrid two (2) week stretch in February, during which they had the
� misfortune to close out the season with 5 outa 7 games on the road.
So let's see what we mean by "pretty darn well" ...
- Swept by Florida State
- Swept by NC State
- Split with Maryland
- Split with Virginia
- Split with Duke
- Lost badly to Notre Dame
That's what you call "pretty darn well" ??? Looks pretty darn average to
me. And Carolina's road stretch is no one's fault but their own. I seem
to recall you took Jeff Jones to task for scheduling a Wahoo road swing
thru Tobacco Road lasted season. You gonna take Snuff out behind the
woodshed and give him a good whuppin' for doing the same ill-advised thang
this year ??? Or is that just another dog-eared Excuse Bible page ???
Carolina under-achieved rather badly this year, mon ami. They were ranked
as high as No 8 in most pre-season polls. They shoulda been a low No 5 or
high No 6 seed but Snuff's legendary Schnozz got 'em a fluffed-up No 4.
Bob Hunt
|
15.946 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:14 | 29 |
| Just in case you missed this one Chris.....I see you cowardly hid from
it in the ACC note.... :-)
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 17.3716 Atlantic Coast Conference Basketball 3716 of 3729
STRATA::CAPPEL 19 lines 16-MAR-1992 12:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still haven't seen a note from ACChris concerning his absolute
ridiculous statements concerning Walt Williams(not being known
by NBA Coaches, scouts, etc.). Not even a single comment on how
stupid that comment was??? :-)
Plus did anyone else noticed how quickly he shut up when given hard
evidence that he called Charlotte's pick of Larry Johnson the right
pick and that they shouldn't have picked Mutombo. Not even an
admission of error????
Plus he's on the Virginia underachieved bandwagon but fails to point
out how miserably UNC has underachieved this year. Talent-wise they
were a top-5 team with no holes and a supposed superior coach. Instead
they end the season 3-6 after an 18-3 start. Dean must be thanking
his lucky stars that he scheduled his regular 7-10 cupcakes again this
year.
And he has the gall to call himself objective....
|
15.947 | Simply put, you're wrong. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:14 | 9 |
| Best know your facts before speaking so boldly Ketch. Virginia's
horrid road trip thru North Carolina last year was set up strictly
as the result of the Cavs desire to get in an extra non-conference game.
(Notre Dame, whom they barely beat.) On the other hand UNC had absolutely
no control over their season-ending schedule - it was handed to them
and not modified.
- ACC Chris
|
15.948 | Still waiting for the critique of Dean's weekend coaching ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:19 | 14 |
| re: .946
For the record I was on the Larry Johnson bandwagon at least as early as
BobHunt. Up until recently it appeared that was a mistake. Now I'm
not so sure, although the crook Westhaids obvious explotation of
Mutombo is certainly not helping the kid.
As to Walt Williams, you've misquoted me so badly it's hardly worth
pointing out. Did I say nobody would know about Williams? No. Only
that going to Maryland was a mistake and cost him money, which is an
opinion I'll admit can't be proven or disproven.
- ACC Chris
|
15.949 | re: Chris' lasted | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:28 | 20 |
| Trackin' down these mistruths a chris's could be a full-time job!
Denny
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 17.3665 Atlantic Coast Conference Basketball 3665 of 3731
28964::KNORR "Graphics Workstation Support" 10 lines 13-MAR-1992 13:29
-< Walt in Carolina Blue. Ooo, it woulda been *sweet*! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No I ain't busted Waugamain. I said *I'd* take him at #2. I seriously
doubt he'll go that high. If he'd_a gone to UNC his fundamentals would
be better, his shot selection better, and every man, woman, and child
in the USA woulda heard of him, to say nothing of every owner, agent,
coach, and scout. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Humbly yours,
- ACC Chris
|
15.950 | TV exposure == money in Faintastic NBA | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:45 | 7 |
| re: .-1
If every man, woman, and child in the USA has heard of Walt Williams,
then I stand humbly corrected.
- ACC Chris
|
15.951 | Only the true believers can ride this bus !!! | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:52 | 19 |
| � For the record I was on the Larry Johnson bandwagon at least as early as
� BobHunt. Up until recently it appeared that was a mistake. Now I'm
� not so sure, although the crook Westhaids obvious explotation of
� Mutombo is certainly not helping the kid.
Get *OFF* this ride. There ain't *NO* room on the LJ Bandwagon for
sunshine soldiers like you. You had your chance to stick with our main
main from the very beginning but you shot your misguided bolt and now
you're sleazily trying to climb back on. Be gone with you, you heathen
infidel.
You can get back on if you repeat the following mantra ...
LARRY IS THE MAIN MAIN.
IT NEVER WAS A MISTAKE.
I SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO BOB HUNT.
HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT.
Bob Hunt
|
15.952 | You meant *that* Walt Williams? Never mind... | JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in '92 | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:53 | 9 |
| re .950:
> If every man, woman, and child in the USA has heard of Walt Williams,
> then I stand humbly corrected.
oh yeah, I remember him...wasn't he the baseball player with no neck? :-)
py
|
15.953 | Not denying your point on IU's front line BTW... | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:56 | 20 |
| T, I'll admith that IU does not have a physical front line.
Shaq should dominate at the center position. In fact, if LSU meets
IU, Shaq could have a field day if IU goes man-to-man, which they
probably will.
However, IU should have the advantage at every other position.
If you don't think so, then tell me which of LSU's other players
is better than Indiana's equivalent player.
LSU's outside shooters are even worse than IU's have been lately,
and that should continue. LSU isn't a very good defensive team,
either, as compared to IU which plays a very good defense.
Shaq should have a great game, and IU should win. I haven't seen
any commentators suggest otherwise, even though they may also claim
that IU is a poor-shooting, undersized team. Tell me, T, which of the
prognosticators you read who describe IU as you do also claim that IU
should lose to LSU, should they meet ?
|
15.954 | | DUGROS::ROSS | D-o-u-g | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:56 | 9 |
| Hey, MrT, which of IU's frontline players {Henderson, Cheaney, or
Anderson} would Purdue's center Riley start ahead of if he played for
IU?
In the long line of Purdue's NUKEWIDEBODYDUDS {Russell Cross, Jim
Rowinski, Stephen Scheffler, Craig Riley}, Riley is a distant fourth.
He's about three steps slower than Montross with half the heart.
-dr {exBiG10 Bigot, now ACC Acolyte}
|
15.955 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Mar 16 1992 14:56 | 21 |
| NBA scouts, management and coaches will find a good player no matter
where he is. If Walt Williams is going to end up being a #1 draft
choice, then Maryland was the right choice for him if that was what he
wanted, although perhaps with less notoreity and definitely with fewer
wins while he was in college. Being the number 1 draft choice is
something bankable, the college fame and the memories are not.
Now, if Williams had wanted to play in a top-notch college program and
get more notoreity, then North Carolina would have been a better
choice. The tradeoff would have been - would he have still be a #1
choice had he been a Tar Heel? No one can answer that question. You
can say that he would have won more games in his college career and had
been more noticed by the average college basketball fan had he gone to
Carolina.
Williams did the right thing, though the payoff won't be known until
June.
John
There were no guarantees for Williams going into college.
|
15.956 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Mon Mar 16 1992 15:27 | 22 |
| Raftery was drooling over Riley after having watched the films.
Drooling just like MrT started to drool after watching him coming
on with the strong inside O last year.
Riley could play in the NBA if he'd just quit making the non-stop
stupid OTB/reach/stumble fouls, so he's going nowhere. But he's
a huge mountain a a main with moves and a sweet shot who boards ok
for his massive size and much better than either Hoosier.
To answer: Based on the past two months Eric would be coming in off
the bench to spell either Craig or Alan. Or, more likely, Eric would
start and Bob'd roll Alan off the bench to spell any a the front-liners,
which with his quickness he'd be able to do.
Rolly, I'm not saying Indiana has no chance against LSU. In fack, with
dumb bunny coaching they could win. But their miserable shooting and
susceptibility to front-line foul trouble up front combined with the
fack that Shack is gonna be on a mission from Allah in this game if I
were a betting main I'd lay the 3 points or whatever it is and ride his
Herculean back to the winner's window.
MrT
|
15.958 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Go Fordham Rams! | Mon Mar 16 1992 15:54 | 12 |
|
So, taking the Walt Williams 'mistake' to a logical end. Did Michael
Jordan make a mistake going to UNC? It cost him millions, as he was
only the #3 pick in the draft. Playing for the square peg, round hole
team from Chapel Hell, Jordan's talents were not displayed enough - not
featured enough, to let him leapfrog over Sam "ow, my laig" Bowie and
the #1 pick? If Jordan had gone to a school that allowed him to be THE
MAIN MAN for his tenure - the star - and put up numbers more in line
with his pro performance, wouldn't have been drafted higher, and
consequently, signed a rookie deal more lucrative...
JD
|
15.959 | Can't do better than be PoY, no matter where you play ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:20 | 12 |
| re: .958
Your logic ain't bad JD, but don't discard the fact that the two (2)
NBA execs who failed to pick Jordan just plain blew it. After all,
Michael not only played for a team on TV as much as any in the country,
and not only played for a coach long regarded for his success in
turning raw high schoolers into NBA bread-winners, BUT, ... Michael was
recognized by the entire USA as the #1 collegian in the country! (i.e.
Collegiate PoY)
- ACC Chris
|
15.960 | In anticipation of LSU vs. IU | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:24 | 7 |
| I wanna go on public record as stating that I will NOT debit Bob's 'Moral
Woes' statistic if he should feel the need to clock Dale Brown.
Just wanted to say it.
- ACC Chris
|
15.961 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:25 | 10 |
| Which brings us back to that troubling question you've evaded for
years now: If SuckSmif' is so danged good at moulding "raw talent"
into NBA "breadwinners" how does that conflict with winning Titles?
Jordan went third cuz he was viewed as a an excellent role player type
with good skills but not a great body. In other words, his awesome
talent was NOT showcased cuz it wasn't used, which perhaps also
explains why an unstoppable player such as Michael won ony one Title.
MrT
|
15.962 | Deja Vu all over again ??? | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:38 | 6 |
| If Bob Knight could shut down His Airness in 1984, why cain't he shut down
His Shaqitude this year ???
Hmmmm ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.963 | Must be both lucky and good. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Mar 16 1992 16:41 | 8 |
| There's certainly no conflict in molding raw HS talent into NBA
breadwinning material, but there's also no one-to-one correlation
between having good players and winning Titles. As has been proven
many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.
- ACC Chris
|
15.964 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 16 1992 17:04 | 22 |
|
> There's certainly no conflict in molding raw HS talent into NBA
> breadwinning material, but there's also no one-to-one correlation
> between having good players and winning Titles. As has been proven
> many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
> Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.
And which has been refuted many, many, times as completely irrelevant
and totally ignorant of statistical theory. To wit, as the number of
opportunities go up (particularly chances late in the tournament
fielding talented teams), the probability of multiple championships go
up. Does 1-for-30 overall and 1-for-8 in the Final Four look better
or worse than the expected, break-even performance?
Those are pathetic numbers unless, of course, you can prove the
ridiculous notion that not only does the best team not usually win but
that the best teams are actually underdogs and at a disadvantage, i.e.
that it's a burden being stocked with top-notch talent in the NCAA
tourney, rather than a blessing...
glenn
|
15.965 | So easy to shoot down.... | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Mar 16 1992 17:37 | 53 |
|
>As has been proven
>many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
>Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.
Boy was I waiting anxiously for this statment from ACChris.....
Since college polls are purely objective it would be a safe assumption
that the best team in the country is one of the top 8 seeds in the NCAA
tourney.
So taken that into account I did some research over the last 32
years(sound familiar Chris) and found that 72% of the time a #1 or
#2 seed(one of the top 8 teams) won the tourney. If you add the #3
seeds(who could clearly be the best team in the country that just got off
to a bad start as IU did in 1981) than the percentage rises to 87% of
the time. Only 3 times in the last 32 years did a seed lower than #4
win the Tourney(NC State, Kansas and Villanova)
Tourney winners summary:
#1 Seed: 16 wins
#2 Seed: 7 wins
#3 Seed: 4 wins
#4 Seed: 1 win
#6 Seed: 2 wins
#8 Seed: 1 win
Also when a #1 did not win the tourney, a #1 seed lost in the final
9 other times, making 25 of 32 years that one of the 4 best teams(and
possibly best team)made the final game.
The funny thing is that prior to this year, Snuffy has made the tourney
in 21 of the 31 years as a coach. His seedings for the tourney were
as follows:
#1 Seed: 10 times
#2 Seed: 5 times
#3 Seed: 5 times
#8 Seed: 1 time
So 15 of his 21 appearances, Snuffy has had a golden road to the final
4 and could only come up with **ONE** title. This is particularily
humiliating to NC fans since NC has had more raw talent than any other
program over the last 20 years.
No wonder he's made the sweet 16 so often, it's easy when your heavily
favored to do so and have all that talent. The hard part comes in
actually winning championships once you've gotton there....
Cap
|
15.966 | Pre-emptive strike to stop the spinning from ACChris | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Mar 16 1992 17:39 | 30 |
| Because I know ACChris will start spinning like a top after reading my
previous note, I'll ask him to pick out in what years was it clear that
the best team in the country did not win the tourney. Here are the
champs:
60 Ohio State 71 UCLA 82 NC
61 Cincy 72 UCLA 83 NC State
62 Cincy 73 UCLA 84 Georgetown
63 Loyola 74 NC State 85 Villanova
64 UCLA 75 UCLA 86 Louisville
65 UCLA 76 Indiana 87 Indiana
66 Texas Western 77 Marquette 88 Kansas
67 UCLA 78 Kentucky 89 Michigan
68 UCLA 79 Mich. St 90 UNLV
69 UCLA 80 Louisville 91 Duke
70 UCLA 81 Indiana
Please list who was clearly the best team in the years in question: My
own opinion says that clearly Kansas, Villanova, NC State and Marquette
were not the best teams in the country in the years that they won.
Georgetown in 84(North Carolina had one of the greatest teams of the
last 50 years) might be added to the list but they were 34-3 that year.
So possibly 5 of the last 32 winners were clearly not the best team
in the country. The remaining champions had very impressive records
and teams.
Cap
|
15.967 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Go Fordham Rams! | Mon Mar 16 1992 17:39 | 5 |
| Cap -
But that #8 seed was a very overachieving club. ;-)
JD
|
15.968 | !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Mon Mar 16 1992 22:29 | 8 |
| Cap,
I'm impressed!!!!!
and I applaud your deadly "fatal shot".
WOW,
Kev
|
15.969 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Tue Mar 17 1992 08:18 | 3 |
| Another 'slam dunk' for Cap. Dang he makes it look so easy don't
he?!
Denny
|
15.970 | small nit | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Tue Mar 17 1992 09:41 | 6 |
| I'll add Duke in 1991 as not being the best team in the country. A good
team, absolutely, one of the best sure, but UNLV was clearly the best
team in the country in 1991. In a 7 game series Vegas in 5 or 6.
The Crazy Met
|
15.971 | | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Mar 17 1992 09:45 | 10 |
| Very impressive replies indeed. And, nothing "weaselish" about it.
Not a thing....
BTW, as a casual college hoops fan back when Jordan played at UNC, the
1st and only time I've ever noticed him was during the championship
game. I suspect that only the die-hard college hoops junkies really
knew anything about him (ie. that he had talent)...
Hawk
|
15.972 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 17 1992 09:53 | 19 |
|
Nice work, Cap. You put a lid on any possible future use by Chris of
the exception to logic I outlined below:
> Those are pathetic numbers unless, of course, you can prove the
> ridiculous notion that not only does the best team not usually win but
> that the best teams are actually underdogs and at a disadvantage, i.e.
> that it's a burden being stocked with top-notch talent in the NCAA
> tourney, rather than a blessing...
While the best team does not always win and maybe doesn't even usually
win, what you've proved is that in general, over the long haul, the
cream does rise to the top, consistent with statistical theory. Dean
Smith has been in it for the long haul with said top-notch talent, and
therefore has no excuses of the "bad luck" variety that Chris is fond of
using.
glenn
|
15.973 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Mar 17 1992 09:55 | 14 |
|
I would agree if UNLV had been upset earlier and not beaten by Duke.
However Duke was clearly one of the best teams in the nation and proved
that they were a better team than UNLV. The two teams were close in
talent, had good coaches and were clearly the best two teams in the
nation last year. I don't think a clear argument can be made that
UNLV was clearly a better team than Duke was last year.
If Kansas had won the title instead of Duke or some other team than I
would say that clearly the best team did not win the title. But I see
no evidence pointing to the fact that UNLV was clearly better than
Duke.
|
15.974 | Lest we forget | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Tue Mar 17 1992 09:57 | 14 |
| � 83 NC State
Don't forget this remarkable team actually had to win *NINE* straight
games to win the Whole Thing. If they don't win the ACC Tournament, they
go NIT all the way. Unless someone erases the history books, they will
forever stand as the best reason for playing those geeky money-grubbing
post-season conference championship tournaments that the Big Ten loathes
so much.
If the Pack doesn't win the ACC, the 1983 Final Two would have been Ralph
Sampson against Phi Slamma Jamma, the two best teams in the country that
year.
Bob Hunt
|
15.975 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Mar 17 1992 10:09 | 4 |
| Good point Glenn,
Didn't even realize the vast implications of this study and your
evaluation just made it so much sweeter... :-)
|
15.976 | Ya gotta have standards... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 17 1992 10:12 | 26 |
|
> � 83 NC State
> Don't forget this remarkable team actually had to win *NINE* straight
> games to win the Whole Thing. If they don't win the ACC Tournament, they
> go NIT all the way. Unless someone erases the history books, they will
> forever stand as the best reason for playing those geeky money-grubbing
> post-season conference championship tournaments that the Big Ten loathes
> so much.
How so? Would we (non-NC State fans, of course) somehow have been less
well off if it hadn't happened? If so, I'm sure the system could be set
up to allow even more underdogs the chance to win (like expanding the
field even more and eliminating all seeding) so that we could look back
and say "thank god we watered the process down or there wouldn't have
been a Morehead State of 1992..."
I preferred the days of the 32-team (and 16-team) tournament when the
conference (preferably regular-season) championship really meant
something. You still had underdogs, and great underdog accomplishments
(like Loyola and Texas Western), but at least those underdogs earned
the right to be there.
glenn
|
15.977 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Mar 17 1992 10:27 | 22 |
|
Glenn,
Weren't Loyola and Texas Western only considered underdogs because
they mainly featured black players and many experts during that time
thought that black players played an undisciplined and unintelligent
game. I know Loyola started 4 black players which was basically
unheard of in those days(in fact there were a few southern teams that
pulled out of the NIT and NCAA during the late 50's, early 60's rather
than play a team with a black player) and that Texas Western started
5 black players against all-white Kentucky. Both Loyola and Texas
Western proved the experts of the day wrong by playing a disciplined
and intelligent style of play. Particularily impressive was Loyola's
28-2 record in 63 since when playing in the south, the black players
had to deal with the racial tendencies of those times(different hotels,
resteraunts, etc).
Also Loyola was the #3 ranked team in the nation the year that they won
and Texas Western was #2(28-1 record). Without the racial prejudices
of the day, both teams might have been considered favorites.
Cap
|
15.978 | You fanned on that one, big guy | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Tue Mar 17 1992 10:33 | 15 |
| You missed my point. It has nothing to do with the NCAA Tournament and
whether it's watered down or not.
The 83 NC State Wolfpack speaks for the ACC Tournament, Glenn. The 83
Pack was the ACC Champion and got into the NCAA's on that basis alone.
The conference sent its champ and the champ brought home the national
champeenship in return for the favor.
If memory serves, the NCAA was *not* capped at 64 teams in 1983 (1985 was
the first 64 team year). In 1983, they were still giving first round byes
to the top 4 seeds in each region, I believe. But it doesn't matter,
even if the NCAA's only invited 32 or 16 teams, the 83 Pack was going and
they can thank the ACC Tournament for that. That was my point.
Bob Hunt
|
15.979 | Still a great story | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Tue Mar 17 1992 10:39 | 14 |
| � (in fact there were a few southern teams that pulled out of the NIT and
� NCAA during the late 50's, early 60's rather than play a team with a black
� player)
We talked about this lasted year when Mississippi State made the NCAA's
for the firsted time since 1963, the year when their all-white team showed
remarkable courage in flying out of town under cover to go to Chicago to
play Loyola.
The bigots back in Starkville, Miss were plenty torqued about the idea of
playing against black players but the kids and their courageous coach
defied their own safety and opened up a lot of closed eyes in the process.
Bob Hunt
|
15.980 | History as it has played out does not justify itself... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 17 1992 11:01 | 29 |
|
I don't know about Texas Western, but Loyola was definitely an underdog,
Cap. Maybe not as big as an NC State or Villanova, but they took down
mighty Cincinnati, which was gunning for its third straight
championship. Rallied from something like 15 down in the second half
to do it, too.
Bob, I didn't miss your point at all. NC State justifies the ACC
Tournament only if you accept the fact that what the regular-season
champ or other deserving teams accomplished over 25+ games and what
those teams might have done in the tourney is irrelevant (in the case
of Virginia this year you want to place emphasis on the regular
season). There were only 48 spots available in 1983 whether or not
NC State won or not, so their victory sent someone home, and that kind
of thing has happened many times in many conferences (it's UW-GB's
beef this year, for example). How do you know if only regular-season
champs were allowed automatic bids that there wouldn't be a different
list of NCAA champs and we'd be congratulating the NCAA and the
conferences for setting up the system that way?
I don't dispute the fact that in a system relying on end-of-season
tournaments that middling teams can put together a winning streak
and win it all. My contention that is that, regardless, it's not
preferable. Whether teams belong or not should be determined strictly
on how they perform over the entire season. It's the American way, as
implemented by MLB, for instance.
glenn
|
15.981 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Tue Mar 17 1992 11:04 | 18 |
| re .974
Hunt, you cain vituperate all you want against integrity in college
regular seasons (hint: what you have now is a exhibition season)...
... but you agreed to run the p_name and this is the upteenth time
I've seen "Go Lady 'Hoos !!!" instead a my payment.
Now, granted, you are desperate for something to cling to since your
vastly overrated football team crashed and burned in its meeting
with reality and your hoops squad was rightfully relegated to the
NIT, and you are now grasping for this weak straw called women's
college basketball (YAWN) - do all a that that's fine it's all right
everything's gonna be ok but...
PAY THE DAMNED DEBT BUDDY.
MrT
|
15.982 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ BayouMain | Tue Mar 17 1992 11:08 | 16 |
| I don't buy this jive-bull about the Runnin' Rabble being "clearly
the best team" last year.
Duke had the better center (Laettner is "clearly" the best player
this year and was nearly the best last year), the best point guard
(true, theirs was a sudden business genius multimillionaire), and
in Grant Hill had by far the best swing player. Duke also was much
better coached, with Tark suing his jizz-bag team into the tourney
and then blowing it by taking a ultra-quick squad into a zone at
the darndest times.
Also, when discussing this team or Tark's career people inevitably
and inexplicably forget the Runnin' Rabble's chump change conference
and the oodles a cupcakes it serves up week in week out.
MrT
|
15.983 | Cain't you read ??? | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Tue Mar 17 1992 11:36 | 11 |
| � ... but you agreed to run the p_name and this is the upteenth time
� I've seen "Go Lady 'Hoos !!!" instead a my payment.
What in the world are you bitching about now ??? It's right up there
where it's been all along. You need spectacles or sumpthin ???
Sheesh, some people. They win a bet (heavily stacked in their favor) and
then piss and moan about the payoff. Lasted time I try to be a nice guy,
that's fo' shure.
Bob Hunt
|
15.984 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:30 | 7 |
| Otiose obfuscation at its most vile. .978 was and is out a spec
and you are, drip by drip, slowly welshing on me. Don't MAKE ME
flex my legal know-how in here. Do you wanna go home to joe family
some night at weepily confess that you've just been found criminally
insane by a panel a joe peers? Do you?
F. Lee ShagNasty
|
15.985 | Stupid bet deserves stupid punishment. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:31 | 9 |
| > Can't you read?
I can read fine, and note 15.979, entered today, clearly lacks the
required title.
In other words buddy, you're welshing on your bet.
- ACC Chris
|
15.986 | Not as accurate as portrayed ... | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:32 | 5 |
| Not sure how Cap got the "seedings" of teams prior to the early
1980's, because the NCAA didn't seed teams until then. And if
the polls are the measure, then we should use them throughout;
i.e., let's not count UMass as a #3 seed, but make them the #5 or
#6 seed in the east.
|
15.987 | the model should be honed by this point | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:51 | 0 |
15.988 | You been outsmarted, smarty | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dancing in the deepest oceans | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:53 | 0 |
15.989 | You is barkin up da wong twee | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dancing in the deepest oceans | Tue Mar 17 1992 12:56 | 0 |
15.990 | A big factor nobody ever talks about ... | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Tue Mar 17 1992 17:00 | 11 |
| re .976
Bob is right about NC State. And what's more, if it hadn't been (IMO)
for the weenie 3 point shot that the ACC had that year on an
experimental basis (about 17' 6" if memory serves me right), NC State
would have never won the ACC Tourny.
That line was a travesty, but the Pack had guys who could drain it
(Wittenberg, Lowe, Gannon, Myers), and it paid off in a few wins.
In any other season, they would have been dogmeat ...
|
15.991 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I'm too tough to tame! | Tue Mar 17 1992 17:54 | 7 |
| .990� That line was a travesty, but the Pack had guys who could drain it
.990� (Wittenberg, Lowe, Gannon, Myers), and it paid off in a few wins.
and....(1) huge National Title! :*)
B.A. GO PACK!
|
15.992 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Mar 17 1992 19:46 | 20 |
| Wrong Rich,
My information is completely accurate.
You don't think the NCAA committee seeded the teams prior to the
tourney? Do you think they would do it arbitrarily? It wouldn't
make much sense to schedule a game between the #1 and #2 ranked teams
in the first round now would it? Any tournament committee would want
that matchup for the regional final.
Also why would certain teams receive first round byes in the 60's and
70's? Were they just lucky or do you think they were #1 seeds?
I think you need to put some research into this before declaring
someone's work inaccurate.
Cap
|
15.993 | Your statements are accurate ... NOT | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 18 1992 10:27 | 52 |
| > Wrong Rich,
>
> My information is completely accurate.
>
> You don't think the NCAA committee seeded the teams prior to the
> tourney? Do you think they would do it arbitrarily? It wouldn't
> make much sense to schedule a game between the #1 and #2 ranked teams
> in the first round now would it? Any tournament committee would want
> that matchup for the regional final.
>
> Also why would certain teams receive first round byes in the 60's and
> 70's? Were they just lucky or do you think they were #1 seeds?
>
> I think you need to put some research into this before declaring
> someone's work inaccurate.
>
I'll provide the information tomorrow, since I don't have it here today,
but your information is incorrect. They didn't seed the teams prior to
the tournament, and it often provided one first/second round game between
the lesser lights, with another game between two tough teams.
As far as first round byes, the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big Eight, Missouri
Valley, Pacific Eight, and West Coast Conference champions got automatic
first round byes until the NCAA tournament expanded to 32 teams in 1975.
They usually were the better teams among tournament winners, but often
there was an independent team with a better record, and yet independent
teams never got first round byes. Marquette was one of the better known
examples, even coming into the tournament with a 25-1 record one year,
but Penn was ranked #2 in the country in 1971 as undefeated Ivy League
champions and didn't get a first-round bye (it went to the ACC champ,
as the East Regional had 7 teams and only one bye from the late 50's-1974).
You are wrong, and I'll demonstrate it before the end of the week when
I have the time to type some glaring examples in here. Meanwhile, I
assume you have your research right at hand, so I'll be expecting a
rebuttal to the facts when I enter them.
Do I think they seeded teams arbitrarily ? No. Let's take the Mideast
Region for example. Prior to 1975, the SEC, Big Ten, Ohio Valley, and
Mid-American champions automatically went to the Mideast Region, along
with 2 independents. One year the bracket would look like:
OVC Champ vs Independent / winner vs SEC Champ
MAC Champ vs Independent / winner vs Big 10 Champ
The next year the bracket would look like:
OVC Champ vs Independent / winner vs Big 10 Champ
MAC Champ vs Independent / winner vs SEC Champ
Region independents generally came from the region (i.e., you wouldn't
see an eastern independent like Duquesne, for example, playing outside
the eastern region), and generally would be placed in a bracket where
there earlier rounds weren't against the same teams the played the
previous year. The facts will bear my statements out.
|
15.994 | Seeding argument essentially irrelevant; look at the teams... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 18 1992 10:52 | 13 |
|
The AP rankings should be sufficient to handle this argument if a
strict seeding procedure was not in place in the 1960s and 1970s. Those
rankings are readily available (they're listed in The 1991 Info Please
Sports Almanac, which I don't own; and I'm sure many college hoops
books, which Cap probably does). I do have a list of the Final Four
contestants on hand, though, and from the looks of it I believe that
Cap's contention that the top-seeded teams (or let's say AP Top 10 if
there was no seeding) generally were the ones to fill out the Final Four
ranks...
glenn
|
15.995 | More BK Theater ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Wed Mar 18 1992 11:39 | 6 |
| What's this we hear about Bob, in a fit of rage over the Purdue loss,
canceling the team's upcoming annual post-season awards banquet ???
What happened ??? Domino's couldn't deliver that night ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.996 | perfect NCAA == Indiana and NC losing in round 1 | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Wed Mar 18 1992 11:41 | 5 |
| I though BobK cancelled an appearance before some annual dinner if a
club that has been having them for a long time.
The Crazy Met
|
15.997 | 61-75 info wrong, 75-91 still supports claim | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 11:46 | 48 |
|
>As far as first round byes, the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big Eight, Missouri
>Valley, Pacific Eight, and West Coast Conference champions got automatic
>first round byes until the NCAA tournament expanded to 32 teams in 1975.
That's right I have not disputed that, they garnered either a #1 or
#2 seeds based on winning tougher conferences, thus received byes and
easier 2nd round games. This is what this book stated and I had no reason
to dispute that. You simply stated that someone's work was inaccurate
without providing any proof whatsoever, I'll be the first to admit
something is wrong if it is proven wrong.
During the early 60's it was taken as fact that despite records,
winners of these conferences were considered the stronger teams, thus
they received the byes and easier roads to the final four. There
might have been an anomoly here or there, but this was true in the
majority of cases.
I did not know that they used a specific formula for the Mideast region
and that it alternated as you stated, this fact was not brought up in
the book I used. This does not alter the fact that the Big10 and SEC
received the top rankings in their region(as well as the ACC and other
conferences you listed). This is what this reference stated, so since
it seems I was wrong in this interpretation than I must redo my
premise.
However, this does not change the premise of the best teams
winning the tourney, which was my point. For example, 11 of the 17
winners since 1975 were top seeds and it can easily be said that
Cincinatti was the top team in the their region in 62, UCLA was the best
in 64-65,67-73 and NC State was the best in 74, which means that 22
of the 31 years the best team in their region won the tourney and in
each one of those years as well as many others it can easily be said
that the one of the top teams in the country(top 4) won the tourney,
quite a difference from saying that the best team in the country rarely
wins the tournament. That statement is unfounded, don't you agree.
I found this information in a book at the Library(College basketball
reference book) while taking a break during work I was doing for my
Master's. If you'd like I will provide you with the name and author
of the book next time I am there so that you can see how easily it
was to think that teams were seeded based on the statements in the
book. For example, it talked of the top-ranked East Regional team
facing the top-ranked West Regional team in the 69 final and it talked
about Dayton advancing from a lower seeding to break into the final 4
in 1967.
Thanks for correcting the error.
|
15.998 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 11:55 | 14 |
| That's correct Glenn, my entire premise is that the best teams do
win the tourney instead of rarely winning the tourney(as was previously
stated). This author was apparently in error based on his statements
(although they may have been personal observations), but he stated
that the winners of certain conferences received the top 1 or 2 seeds
(dependent upon the region) based on there winning their
conference(because their winning was considered a significant
accomplishment as it was felt that the competition in these conferences
was greater than between the independents or other conferences).
I'd be willing to bet that the winners of the major conferences were
also among the top ranked teams in the polls the majority of the time.
Cap
|
15.999 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Mar 18 1992 11:59 | 21 |
| The Greater Bloomington Kiwanis Club has been hosting the annual awards
banquet for the IU hoop team since the forties. BK decided to cancel
it this year. His rationale, according to what I read in the paper, is
that the seniors on the IU team (which to him was the true purpose of
the dinner, honoring them) were being adequately honored at the last
home game of the season. I don't know whether it had anything to do
with their poor performance against Purdue or not.
The problem comes in with the way the cancellation was supposedly done.
This banquet raises funds for worthy causes. Knight cancelled the
banquet through his secretary two days ago. The Kiwanis Club had
already spent the money on promotion, tickets and so forth and now
needs to refund a whole lot of money.
My opinion? If he wants to cancel, then that's fine. He should have
done it either months ago, or had the banquet this year and cancelled
future ones after it. Don't pull the plug at the last minute.
This is from not knowing more than what I read in the paper.
John
|
15.1000 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:01 | 19 |
| re .995
Witch, why don't you just get out a this note. We pay our debts
out MidAmerica way.
As for the good Bob, yes he cancelled the annual Kiwanis Club
men's basketball awards banquet saying nobody on this team deserves
an award - except maybe something like "Most Pathetic Jump Shooter"
or "Worst Rebounder" or "Most Abject Inside Defender."
Yes, Witch, Bob pays *his* debts (unlike you), but the thing is this
year none are due. He also might be trying to motivate a squad that
many familiar with it figure to either lose to LSU or to Gougetown/
FSU one game later.
That's why missing out on the Big10 Title hurts so much, this is not
a tournament year for the Hoosiers.
MrT
|
15.1001 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:25 | 3 |
| SO T how do you justify him stiffing the charities at the las
minute. Cain't do it eh? At least you could admit Bob is wrong here.
Denny
|
15.1002 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:43 | 15 |
|
My feeling is that since Knight donates tens of thousands of dollars
out of his pockets to worthy causes and contributes time and effort
as well and that it is not known if IU or Knight will reimburse money to
the charities mentioned that perhaps judgement on Knight should be
withheld until the full story is known.
If he pulled out of this event and it cost the charities money than
he was wrong.
Canceling an engagement at the last minute is not what I would consider
a good act as I'm sure many people were inconvenienced.
However I don't know the full story of what happened.
|
15.1003 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:46 | 6 |
| What's this?
The AP article was careful to mention that Bob will cover the Kiwanis
Club's losses out a his own pocket.
MrT
|
15.1004 | update ! | LUNER::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:46 | 7 |
| This is The Doc here at Midnight Central .... we now switch you to spin
control specialists Shaughnessy and Cappel, who will comment on the
positive aspects of the cancellation, with an analysis on how this is
but further proof of BobKnights 'greatness'.
Switching over live to Bloomington, IN with special feeds to Hudson, MA
and Minneapolis, MN ....
|
15.1005 | This ain't like him | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:48 | 7 |
| I don't know the full story either but if he canceled this annual gig in a
quick fit of pique over their loss to Purdue, then this is either BK
Theater Deluxe (meaning the event will go on as usual once BK simmers back
down) or he's giving his detractors all the more reason to question his
tactics. Or both.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1006 | I think it stinks | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:51 | 18 |
|
As I understand it, Knight told the Kiwanis club that that he'd
reimburse them for all of their expenses. I don't know what exactly that's
supposed to cover.
As an IU fan, I ***HATE*** this. Whether or not cancelling the banquet
is somehow justifiable, and I doubt that it is, it's going to end up looking
like (another) overreaction on Knight's part, and an incredibly arrogant one
at that. I don't know all of the facts either, but years ago when I got to
watch the awards banquest on TV, it seemed like an honor for the players that
both they and the attending/viewing audience really enjoyed. I don't like
seeing that go away.
Then, of course, this will become another item in the opposing coaches'
list of "Reasons you shouldn't go to Indiana". Knight just keeps making
recruiting harder and harder on himself.
tom
|
15.1007 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:57 | 7 |
| The oversight was unintentional (since I generally like Knight) but I
also did read that IU/Knight would make good on the expenses incurred
thus far.
I basically agree with .1006
John
|
15.1008 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 12:58 | 12 |
| >If he pulled out of this event and it cost the charities money than
>he was wrong.
>Canceling an engagement at the last minute is not what I would consider
>a good act as I'm sure many people were inconvenienced.
Geez Doc, this doesn't look like spin control to me. I simply stated
that pulling out of any event at the last moment was bad and that since
the full story was unknown let's not condemn anyone.
|
15.1009 | Reimbursement not good enough... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:05 | 13 |
|
Commitments were made to people who paid who live and breathe Indiana
basketball and who were counting on seeing this thing. Apparently it's
a 41-year tradition that pre-dates Knight. The reimbursement of the
charities is wonderful but irrelevant to the issue of Knight's behavior
and the people, his fans, that his behavior inconveniences and betrays.
If MrT's explanation that Knight did this as a sort of punishment for
an undeserving team truly is the only mitigating circumstance, it's
inexcusable. I'm sure he could find another way to punish his team
without punishing Indiana basketball fans.
glenn
|
15.1010 | What I wanna believe | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:09 | 5 |
| This *has* to be BK Theater ... played out for motivational purposes only.
To his credit, Knight treats the IU Faithful as well as any college coach
has ever done.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1011 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:41 | 3 |
| BK may be reimbursing expenses to date to the Kiwanis,
but they won't be able to raise any money from this, either,
which seemed to be the point of the event in the past.
|
15.1012 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:42 | 10 |
| I agree if done as a punishment to the players that in turn punishes
the fans and inconveniences people who put effort into planning the
event than this is wrong also.
It certainly doesn't make you proud to be an IU fan.
Cap
P.S. I certainly would have been pissed off if I was attending this
event and it was canceled.
|
15.1013 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Mar 18 1992 13:52 | 10 |
| To Knight's credit, he is probably one of the most active coaches
in terms of charities in the country. I would imagine that the
Kiwanis club will either get money from Knight or the team will
have a function at a later date to raise money for charities.
Again since I don't know the full story, can't comment on the charity
aspect of it....Perhaps we will see something happen in the near
future.
|
15.1014 | Note .1004 (?) has no real serious value ...(but don't tell T) | LUNER::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Wed Mar 18 1992 14:21 | 7 |
| re .1008
Cap, I started writing my note *before* you posted yours. It was
intended to be a joke about future notes from you but especially MrT
defending Knight (which may very well be justified) ....
I mean, why spoil a good needle with facts ? :-)
|
15.1015 | Go Blue Young Guns!!! | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Mar 18 1992 15:39 | 21 |
| Enough of the that IU stuff. The FAB 5 will be in town Friday an it
looks like I'll be hustling a ticket or two for the weekend. They have
a nice layout in the Atlanta Journal/Constitution. Some comparisons to
the 1989 Title Team:
* The Wolverines were third in the Big Ten and played in the
Southeast Regional(Atlanta).
* The regional semifinals and final were in Lexington Ky.
* The Final Four was played in a dome. Seattle Kingdome in '89;
the Minneapolis Metrodome this year.
* Steve Fisher as coach only not newly hired. One of three Big Ten
team coaches that have won an NCAA tourney. In two trips to the
tourney 1 winner 50% ratio.
The odds are against the 'rines but I wouldn't count them out. It
could be a great match up with 'Zona file if seeds go as planned.
Roy L.
|
15.1016 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Thu Mar 19 1992 09:59 | 8 |
| Bob and the AD had been talking to the Kiwanis for months about
cancelling the thing, the thinking being that Seniors' Day at the
last home game already fulfilled that mission.
As for charity, only one coach I know of has taken nearly $100,000
out of his own pocket to help one if players in dire straits.
MrT
|
15.1017 | Bob's mean, but his players apparently aren't. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Mar 19 1992 10:12 | 6 |
| Sports Cover Story in todays USA Today features, you guessed it, Bob.
To sum up the story, it appears the kinder & gentler BobKnight has
taken a backseat in recent weeks ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.1018 | | DUGROS::ROSS | Party on, MrT | Thu Mar 19 1992 10:39 | 21 |
| MrT will get plenty of ammunition out of today's article in USA Today,
though, Chris.
1) The Indiana team is characterized as "loaded" with talent. Except:
"It could use some bulk, yes. Maybe a purer outside shooter or
two."
Gee, other than lacking size and shooting talent, they're awesome!
2) Despite Bob's rampage, all of the quotes from the IU players show
that they know it's their fault for lacking mental toughness and
no backlash at all at the coach.
I think this Knight episode is going to start a nice run for the
Hoosiers. I expect a Final Four appearance. If they make it there,
watch out.
Chris, could you live with 4 > 1????
|
15.1019 | I'd much rather have 3 > 2! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Mar 19 1992 11:06 | 10 |
| Objectively speaking Ross, I'll be absolutely flabergasted if IU were
to even advance to the Final 4, let alone win a Title. Nothing against
Bob, but I've gotta concede that Indiana, like North Carolina, is a
flawed operation. In our case, we're incredibly slow afoot. In IU's
case, they're small but, even worse, live and die by the outside
jumper. Tough to win a Title that way, cause some days you just aren't
gonna shoot it well ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.1020 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Thu Mar 19 1992 11:15 | 22 |
| That's right, the only way to cover the occassional bad shooting
skein (or, in IU's case, the occassional good shooting skeing) is
to get easy inside shots through sheer power, and to compensate by
getting more shots by way of rebounding, with the O-'bounds being
especially delectable cuz they so often yield the easy tip-in or
jam. Also helpful is the ability to make up for poor shooting by
blocking and/or changing the other team's shots.
IU has some things going for it (great team speed, good shot selection,
tough D on the ball and in the passing lanes, good ball handling) but
however it's told is steal... a small, poor shooting team.
Given their spotty performance against tip-top competition (except OSU,
who also lacks size) the Hoosiers' #2 seed is quite generous.
But their bracket is anything but, looking at LSU and then either
Gougetown or those nukewidebodystudlys from Tallahassee.
They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year. Worse, there is
no big main on their horizon in terms of incoming recruits.
MrT
|
15.1021 | | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 19 1992 11:49 | 6 |
| > They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year. Worse, there is
> no big main on their horizon in terms of incoming recruits.
No, they will be favorites in both of their first two games. It will
be a choke if they lose to EIU or BYU, and an upset loss to LSU which
would require Bob to be outcoached by Dale.
|
15.1022 | The computer says...... | DEMSUP::MACDONALD | I love March Madness!! | Thu Mar 19 1992 12:04 | 18 |
| RE: .1020
>>>They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year.
>>> MrT
That's not what Jeff Sagarin's "objective" computer says.
According to Tuesday's USA Today, he played the tournament 640,000
times on the computer and the most frequent winner was INDIANA with
141,250 wins. Kansas was 2nd and Duke 3rd.
Altho the article goes on to say Saragin's computer hasn't
been right about the champ since '82, how do you account for the
big difference between winning the computer tournament more than
any other team and you're claim quoted above? Sure you're not
just setting everyone up for "one of the greatest coaching performances
of all time" should IU make the Final Four [or better]??? :-)
MAC2
|
15.1023 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Thu Mar 19 1992 12:08 | 17 |
| You cain say that so long as you accept that they're not overrated,
which I don't. They gave up big leads to several teams this year,
and have a mediocre record against top level competition. What kept
them so highly ranked was preseason expectactions, Bob's reputation,
and the pud first half of their conference schedule.
I don't think Bob expects much out a this team, and I know I don't.
They'll be pitting any of three forwards against Shack, or Alonzo,
and this is a team poor shooting team that needs to either hit from
the outside or drive the lane to win. They've had trouble with every
dominating big main they've seen this year, losing more often than
not, and Shack and Alonzo are certainly dominating.
Poor rebounding, especially on defense, and susceptibility to having
a lot a shots either blocked or changed is the reason for this.
MrT
|
15.1024 | And ya calls me a sandbagger! | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Thu Mar 19 1992 12:34 | 10 |
| T,
You reminds me of the High School coach who shouts "No, No" as his
backup guard takes a three-pointer, then yells "Great shot" as it
swishes through the net.
Even tho I recognize IU's shortfalls, I got 'em in the Final 4,
which is whar they'll be.
MikeL
|
15.1025 | Big Ten only hype if IU ends up #2 | CSCOA1::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 19 1992 13:44 | 17 |
| I finally recognize that T is right. IU is not a great team.
They would struggle against LSU, a #7 seed (which is where LSU
should be seeded).
Some reasonable conclusions:
IU, unable to be convincing against a #7 seed, should themselves
be seeded in the #6-#8 range somewhere. They probably wouldn't
even get out of the first round then. Seems like the NCAA really
is doing Bob a favor.
The Big Ten Conference, which had IU as one of its two best teams,
clearly is overrated. Ohio State, which lost twice to the lowly
Hoosiers, probably should be a #2-#4 seed somewhere. If we
make IU a #6 seed, we would need to seed Michigan State around #8
and Michigan around #10. This overrated conference only deserves
4 teams at most, so we should see Iowa kicked out, and perhaps
deserving Virginia in the NCAA's instead.
|
15.1026 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Thu Mar 19 1992 14:29 | 25 |
| I don't see how the Big10 could be overrated given that the league
is rated somewhere in the 3rd-5th best category this eyar.
But you overlook certain things:
1) Bob knows the other teams/coaches cold, and has the time to
prepare for them well ahaid a time.
2) Indiana goes into the tourney on a downswoop; not so State,
OSU, and Michigan.
3) Michigan was chosen by Bill Walton to win it all; they've gotten
more dangerous and better with each game.
4) Ditto for OSU with Funderburke.
5) In a tourney scenario Bob lacks the team/coach knowledge and
prep time he has in Big10 play.
6) Michigan State goes in recovered from injuries to key players
(Stegenga).
Other than these things, you're right!
MrT
|
15.1027 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Money don't matter 2 night ... | Fri Mar 20 1992 10:35 | 1 |
| More T Obstu-fic-ca-shon ...
|
15.1028 | dis-tor-shon | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | DailyAffirmation w/ CajunMain | Fri Mar 20 1992 12:13 | 1 |
| re 1
|
15.1029 | Defense? We don't need no steenking defense | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Sun Mar 22 1992 19:00 | 37 |
|
Nice win by the Hoosiers to make the Sweet Sixteen. What had to happen
happened --- good outside shooting by Indiana, and not much from the outside
by LSU after that incredible shooting stretch in the first 6 or 7 minutes.
Nice that Eric Anderson's back from his long vacation on the offensive end.
Observations:
* If the key to the game for LSU is changing defenses to keep IU's
offense off balance, why is it they don't change defenses till the end of the
game?
* Is LSU the only team in country to run a defense for an ENTIRE game
that seems to be designed solely to keep a player out of foul trouble?
* Shaq better stay in college another year. He's a nice player
offensively from inside 8 feet, but he's apparently got no game beyond that
at all. He's without a clue defensively. Matt Nover went for what must have
been a career high against him, and Cheaney made him look worse. For a while
I thought they'd have to be scraping pigeon droppings off Shaq during the
timeouts.
* How can a college player be so winded he needs to come out after
EIGHT MINUTES?
* Bill Walton has a severe case of mumble-mouth, but he makes better
observations than any other color person in the tournament.
Interesting path for the Hoosiers to get to the Final Four. First,
the LSU matchup the committee (read: CBS) has been trying to set up for 5
years. Then, the Florida State team they ousted from the tournament last year.
(Can you spell R-E-V-E-N-G-E? I knew that you could). If they get past them,
they probably go up against a team that already beat them this year by 18 on
a neutral court. But if they play like they did lasted night...
tom
|
15.1030 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Sun Mar 22 1992 20:17 | 14 |
| Tom, nice win by IU. I believe however, that it wasn't so much what
Indiana did as it was what LSU didn't do. That had to be one of Mr.
Brown's poorer coaching jobs. I said earlier this season that he
hadn't been coaching well since 1987. Last night just proved my point.
Horrendous is the only way to describe it. It should've been obvious
to anyone that Anderson and Henderson were hot and would continue to
drain the baseline jumper. Therefore, you'd better come out of the
zone, right Dale? Wrong, you stay in it and let them have their way
with you!
Again, nice win by IU but I'd rather have seen Rupp coach LSU last
night, and he's been dead 16 years!
WILDCAT
|
15.1031 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 23 1992 09:37 | 16 |
|
> Shaq better stay in college another year. He's a nice player
> offensively from inside 8 feet, but he's apparently got no game beyond that
> at all. He's without a clue defensively. Matt Nover went for what must have
> been a career high against him, and Cheaney made him look worse. For a while
> I thought they'd have to be scraping pigeon droppings off Shaq during the
> timeouts.
If Shaq goes in for this "college is to enjoy" bull from Dale Brown
he's making a big mistake, in my opinion. I don't think he's learned a
damn thing about hoops at LSU over the last couple years. Better to
come out, take the #1 money, and learn on the job, for real...
glenn
|
15.1032 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Mar 23 1992 10:04 | 18 |
| Nice little sidelight during the IU-LSU game was the occasional
reminder of the '87 IU-LSU matchup and BobKnight's comments regarding
Dale Brown's coaching ability.
I was amused at Knight's comments and I paraphrase "I was not confident
about coming back from the deficit ( 13? point at halftime) and then
I remembered who was coaching down the hallway. Then I knew we had a
chance." Pretty damning and accurate, Bob . And right, we're supposed
to believe that Knight has changed his mind about Brown's coaching
ability. Based on what?? Haw Haw.
Geez, with Bob putting on a leetle weight, adding more gray and always
wearing that red/scarlet sweater, he's getting more and more to look
like the OSU alum that he is!
Could Columbus eventually be Bob's " coaching finale" down the road??
MikeL
|
15.1033 | Will Shaq be back? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Mon Mar 23 1992 10:31 | 11 |
|
Good point, Glenn. I was thinking Shaq needed to work on other
aspects of his game, but maybe staying at LSU will just make that worse
instead of better. He certainly didn't get a chance to show anything on
Saturday. The bad thing is that you know it doesn't have to be that way.
He's quick enough to play legitimate defense, and I don't think it would take
long to turn him into a reasonable shooter from about 10 feet. He already
seems to have solved his free-throw shooting problem (13-13 against IU, I
believe).
tom
|
15.1034 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 13:44 | 29 |
| Dale Brown dominated the game.
Great job by this vaunted genius a a coach, staying in the zone
like he did. He robbed the Hoosiers a the chance to drive down
the lane all day long and get their haids and shoulders deep
bruised with rejected balls.
As Alan Henderson said, "I didn't understand what was going on with
that, but I sure enjoyed getting those (open) shots."
But I credit Brown for the classy maudlin touch he laid on those
cliched-catharsis grubbers called sports "journalists." He tells
a story about how some kids toss a concrete block through a windshield
and kill a family and how the husband grieving his daid family held
no grudge, and, sensing the parallel between that mass murder and
Bob slamming a telephone in '87 decides that he will set aside his
anger toward Bob and give him a call and inform him that he is
forgiven.
Haa !!
Btw, MikeL, it was was 20 seconds or so left and IU down by a few and
Bob calls a TO and, "I was afraid we were gonna lose, but then I looked
down the sideline and saw Dale Brown talking to his players and knew
right then we could pull it out."
Haa hee !!
MrT
|
15.1035 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Mar 23 1992 13:56 | 11 |
| Thanks for the correction T. Still makes me laugh!
Haw
MikeL
As Hoosiers und Knight react with glee with the continued zone,I am
reminded of the UNC-Marquette game whence McGuire and squad
stupefyingly watch Deano's denizens go into the fo'corners and destroy
mo'.
|
15.1036 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 23 1992 14:03 | 8 |
| Mike L -
When I watched the replay of Marquette-UNC a few weeks ago at lunch at
a local 'restaurant', I was chuckling when UNC went to the 4 corners.
The Marquette players eyes got huge, Maguire started licking his chops,
and the Heels went spinning down the tubes....genius move...
JD
|
15.1037 | Not much fun to look forward to ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Mon Mar 23 1992 14:15 | 5 |
| Michigan starts five freshmen and makes the Sweet Sixteen.
Whimper.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1038 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:08 | 7 |
| I had to luv it when the marble-moufed Bill Walton (the greatest
college middlemain ever) said, "you have to give a lot a credit
for this win to Bob Knight, he is able to get his player's to
believe in themselves and stick with their game plan even when
14 points down and being completely dominated by Shaq."
MrT
|
15.1039 | I thought you hated when they said that ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:12 | 3 |
| So, are they making a run or not, Mr Sand Bagger ExTraordinare ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1040 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:19 | 5 |
| Not talking to you buddy, Dr. Inga tells me that it cain turn
into a self-abuse pattern to continue interacting with someone
who has cheated you.
MrT
|
15.1041 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:21 | 20 |
|
After hearing Mr. T (ultimate Spin doctor) talk about how poorly
his IU team shoots, I expected them to build a new addition given the
presence of shaq. But nooo, they shot the ball pretty well and simply
showed what a little outside shooting can do against a feeble zone.
T, you're still the greatest spin doctor around...you should really
think about helping the Dem's out...they need some good folks who can
tell a lie and make people believe it.
I though IU handled the situation very well and I was impressed
with their poise after being down by 14. They shot the ball real well
which is contrary to what I've been hearing for 5 months..
I guess seeing is really believing.
bill..g.
|
15.1042 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:25 | 11 |
| Bill -
In fairness to MrT, I watched a few of Indiana's games down the stretch
- and they were shooting horrbly. Henderson was in a funk, as was
Bailey, and Eric Anderson looked like he'd miss the ground if he
dropped the ball out of his hands.
The Purdue game was perfect example - IU come down, make a zillion
passes - CLANG. Repeat. Clang. Repeat.
JD
|
15.1043 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:31 | 16 |
| bill..g, say what joe want but the fack remains that against the
tough comp Indiana has shot poorly more often than not, and has
been badly outperformed in terms a rebounds and blocked shots.
They're a small team that MUST shoot well to win. They shot 55%
yesterday and won, but over the last several games (excerpting
the Ohio State game) had hovered around 35%.
If joe are big you cain shoot badly and make up for it with the
O-boards or blocks. Not so IU.
As I said, Dale Brown dominated this game. They won't have that
luxury against, in sequence, Pat Kennedy, Bob Harrick, and CoachK,
who also have much more balanced teams than LSU.
MrT
|
15.1044 | Montross would seem to have size on Funderburke ... | RHETT::KNORR | Graphics Workstation Support | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:52 | 11 |
| I gotta fess up and state I've barely seen any Ohio State games this
year. (Seems Indiana's been absolutely *dominating* the tube from the
Big10 conference ...)
Anyway what cain Dean/UNC expect Thursday night? Given that Carolina
doesn't have a player in the same stratosphere as JJ
height/position-wise, cain the Heels hope to exploit Montross & Co. in
the interior? What're the weaknesses of this Buckeyes 5?
- ACC Chris
|
15.1045 | | CAMONE::WAY | Doin' the Vatican Rag | Mon Mar 23 1992 15:53 | 9 |
| MrT,
did you happen to catch the HOward STern show this weekend?
If you didn't, and you want a copy, send me a tape... I'm telling you,
this show was WORTH saving for posterity....
'Saw
|
15.1046 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 16:00 | 6 |
| I'd luv to obtain the tape. I was a avid listener of Howard and
Robin in their early daze in New York and thought the show was
entertainment at its best. I've only seen his TV show twice, and
I tell you MrT was NOT dissapointed!
MrT
|
15.1047 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Mar 23 1992 16:07 | 24 |
| The Buckeyes biggest weakness seems to be their lack of offensive
concept, i.e., their propensity for chucking the pill to JJ and
standing around admiring him like everybody else.
OSU seems to be a slow-starting squad, and is not especially big
up front. ThunderBurp is a much quicker/higher jumper than Montross
and has better timing and overall skeels.
The Bucks are quick and will no doubt try to run n' gun if the stiff
Montross should have any effect. If that doesn't work they'll match
Smif' stiff-for-stiff and send in 7-1 Bill Robinson.
The worse news for the Star Hells could be ultra-quick Mark Baker,
who likes to play the D and will be in Hubert's face. Also quick is
Chris Jent, who might match up against Lynch.
The Star Hells could also have difficulty dealing with the Buckeyes'
pressure D.
MrT
If Snuffer cain force the pace on OSU like he did this weekend on
Bama he cain win the game. If the Bucks are able to run it's the
standard U.S. Government issue Sweet16 Excellent Loss and goodbye
routine for the Hells.
|
15.1048 | | CAMONE::WAY | Doin' the Vatican Rag | Mon Mar 23 1992 16:08 | 17 |
| Send me a tape:
Either
Frank Way BMF 1-1
Or
Frank Way
85 North Street
Hebron CT 06248
I'll make you a copy. You'll LOVE it....
'Saw
|
15.1049 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '92 | Mon Mar 23 1992 16:26 | 10 |
| Hey 'saw I might send a tape as well. I remember having the combo of
Imus in the morning and then Howard and Robin in the afternoon when
both were on NBC in NY. Howard's dial a dates for Friday afternoons
were something else. They ranged from getting a date with a virgin -
self proclaimed don;t think he went as far as checking - to dates with
call girls to dates with women into heavy metal. Real fun stuff, almost
made Fridayt afternoon traffic at the bridge/tunnel bearable.
The Crazy Met
|
15.1050 | | CAMONE::WAY | Doin' the Vatican Rag | Mon Mar 23 1992 16:42 | 6 |
| He is way far out now....
I actually HURT on Sunday morning from laughing so hard....
'Saw
|
15.1051 | Everyone now, send a tape to the 'Sawmain! | SASE::SZABO | The Ticketmaster | Tue Mar 24 1992 08:52 | 1 |
|
|
15.1052 | Hawk, Hawk, Hawk.... | RUGBY1::way | Wrap them knees, boy! | Tue Mar 24 1992 09:15 | 18 |
| No....
Everybody send a tape to HAWK at
John Szabo
c/o The Black Hole For Tickets
7 Yellow Brick Road
Bradford Mass
I guarantee he will lose your tapes, and then I won't have to work at making
copies....
hth,
'Saw
|
15.1053 | | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:26 | 18 |
| Ah Howard.
Wasn't he in DC in the early 80's? I remember when the Air Florida
jet crashed into the Potomac in early '81. Friend of mine who lived
in DC told me the next day Howard was calling the airline requesting
Air Florida to change its flight pattern so's their jets wouldn't fly
over that particular bridge at rush hour. Cold man,cold. Don't remember
if my friend told me Howard originated from DC or was in syndication
from NY.
You guys remember back a few years when 'BCN would run his radio shows
on Sat. AM? I recall one show when he was singin with the Fabulous
Thunderbirds in a little re-hash of "Ain't that tough enough (?!)"
called "Ain't no m#ff too tough." Classic.
MikeL
|
15.1054 | | RUGBY1::way | Wrap them knees, boy! | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:29 | 8 |
| I think Howard was syndicated out of New Yawk....
He's irreverant, without a doubt. His show is getting farther and farther
outta control every week. He's pushing the envelope, and I love it...
'saw
|
15.1055 | Just a thought.... | AKOCOA::PETERSON | | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:36 | 7 |
|
...Saw'
Ya think Howard deserves his own note?
Mel
|
15.1056 | More ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Go Lady 'Hoos !!! | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:38 | 16 |
| � Friend of mine who lived in DC told me the next day Howard was calling
� the airline requesting Air Florida to change its flight pattern so's their
� jets wouldn't fly over that particular bridge at rush hour.
That was a *big* part of the problem with that particular crash. I've
only flown out of Washington National once and I fought like hell to avoid
it. Inbound and outbound flight "lanes" are extremely restricted in and
around that area. Commercial flights are strictly prohibited with good
reason from flying over the White House, the Pentagon, the CIA, ...
So those Wash National pilots have to fly inside some *very* tight lines
and that Air Florida crash was, in part, caused by the pilot's inability
to maneuver freely in that terrible weather. Use Dulles and don't sweat
the extra drive time. National makes me way too nervous.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1057 | | RUGBY1::way | Wrap them knees, boy! | Tue Mar 24 1992 10:58 | 6 |
| Should probably keep Howard either in the Junk Note, OR, because it
doesn't conflict with the LA Law and Northern Exposure noting in the
Southern Cal note, we could do it there....
'Saw
|
15.1058 | | SASE::SZABO | The Ticketmaster | Tue Mar 24 1992 11:03 | 15 |
| re: the Air Florida disaster
What a coincidence- last night I was having conversations with my bar
customers about plane crashes as the Sony wide-screen was showing the
latest, and one of my comments was that whenever I 1st hear of a crash,
I get this sick feeling as I recall the Air Florida crash and the
footage of the rescue scenes in the river. I also did know someone who
died in the AF crash- a salesman from a company I worked at before
DEC...
Also, one of my wildest fantasies is to be a survivor of a plane
crash...
Hawk
|
15.1059 | Wasn't feeling too confident on yesterday's flight | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dancing in the deepest oceans | Tue Mar 24 1992 12:01 | 9 |
| Jai's cousin with whom we stayed in Maimi a few weeks ago was an Air
Florida sky-waitress (better known as flight attendants) and was
scheduled for that flight out of National. She was rescheduled to
another flight the day before the crash.
Funny Jai was just telling me this the other night after the USAir
crash and now we're talking about it in here.
--dan'l
|
15.1060 | on airplane crashes | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 12:27 | 27 |
| I'm not sure I like all this talk about crashing and burning in
the Big10 note during the middle a the NCAA tourney.
Take it to the Big8 or Big Least note please.
Howard & Robin started off in DC and were run out a town on a rail
after his little Air Florida imbroglio. Also, he started his storied
radio career on the BU college station.
A close friend a mine in Denver's wife was the haid stew on the
United flight that went down in Portland several years ago, a
especially harrowing experience seeing that they circled for hours.
She said the when they ran out a fuel the engines made a wierd noise
and the plane jolted and then the lights went out.
Then the plane made the too fast descent down towards the river.
She said it was funny how there was no wailing or hysteria, just
quiet whimpering. Then the crash, she comes to, her chair is 10 ft.
above the floor at the front edge of the back half, looking down at
a pile of mangled bodies. She was unhurt.
Perhaps the most amazing uninvestigated fack EVER by our allegedly
liberal-adversarial media is the undisputed FACK that the flight
blown up by explosives during takeoff from O'Hare during the heat
of Watergate contained Howard Hunt's wife... carrying $25,000.
MrT
|
15.1061 | I should've known better than to ask | FRETZ::HEISER | maranatha | Tue Mar 24 1992 15:20 | 6 |
| > Perhaps the most amazing uninvestigated fack EVER by our allegedly
> liberal-adversarial media is the undisputed FACK that the flight
> blown up by explosives during takeoff from O'Hare during the heat
> of Watergate contained Howard Hunt's wife... carrying $25,000.
MrT, are these "facks" from some sourc... oh never mind!
|
15.1062 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 15:40 | 17 |
| That Mrs. Howard Hunt perished on a flight that crashed on take
off from O'Hare because a bomb exploded somewhere in the cabin,
and that she was carrying $25,000 is not open to dispute. It was
reported by AP, UPI, Reuters, everybody. But they mentioned it
in a small article, once, and never sought out the answers to the
obvious questions stemming form this. Also, the electronic media
shrugged it off, and the so-called investigative committee somehow
decided that it was all just a big coincidence and that we shouldn't
get hung up on CIA conspiracy theories.
As they say, you cain look it up! Try some microfiched newspapers
in joe public liberry. Or any good Politcal Science desk liberrian
there will know of this by heart and cain tale joe the date and
add'l references.
HTH,
MrT
|
15.1063 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 24 1992 15:46 | 7 |
|
So what's the critical missing piece of information, then, MrT? I'm
sure that, as usual, there's more to this story than you're being up
front about, you conspiracy buff you...
glenn
|
15.1064 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | It ain't the thing, it's the fling | Tue Mar 24 1992 17:47 | 4 |
|
Mrs. Hunt shot JFK! Don't tell the micro-Hunts, though.
Brews
|
15.1065 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Mar 24 1992 19:23 | 26 |
| Nyah, say what you will, but it is acknowledged and established
fact that Mrs. Howard Hunt died in Chicago when the thing was
starting to unravel in a plane that the FAA concluded was blown
up and had in her possession at least $25,000.
If that sounds normal to you, ok by me.
As with JFK, MLK, RFK, and Iran Contra, the powers-that-be ran
a show investigation careful to avoid all the critical issues
and evade the hardest questions and noisily swept the thing under
the rug.
Nixon didn't resign for threat of impeachment based on what was
known, they threatened him into leaving with revealing the really
big stuff. He agreed, and part of the packaged included a pardon
from Ford and a show investigation.
Dunno what it was, but there was something as the non-investigation
of Mrs. Hunt's wierd demise proves, and Nixon wasn't afraid of
embarrassement so much as being impeached for Treason, which carries
a strict death penalty at its most egregious.
We'll never know, just like we'll never know what was in the 600
pounds of documents Ollie and that buck-toothed sec'y of his shredded.
MrT
|
15.1066 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Wed Mar 25 1992 10:14 | 6 |
| Awright T!
Been researching and reading the same stuff ah has. Keep it up
ma main.
MikeL
|
15.1067 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 26 1992 09:10 | 34 |
| Bob's on a classic roll this tourney. (No, I'm not talking
about Bob "Witch" Hunt's badl-faced face-saving exercise, I'm
talking that Pantehon-dweller.)
At various news conferences:
- He's said he' gonna talk fiction cuz that's all sportwriters
write anyway.
- He said that after the Purdue loss he made his team sleep
outside.
- He appeared yesterday before the press brandishing a bullwhip,
explaining that dipping the sink in water enhanced its effectiveness
saying, "there is no finer device you could have" than the 10 foot
bullwhip he was snapping, or tryhing to snap.
- Hee looks down at WAC SID Jeff Hurd, who introduced him, asking
"can I have some water?" (Hurd served him immediately.)
- When asked if he thought games started too late, he answered that
they should start at seven in the morning to get the housewives off
of the Nordic Traks and TV weight programs and cuz coaches would have
time to golf and fish to unwind after the game.
- Later he reminded the press that when his team was in the parking
lot trying to fall asleep, shivering, he occassionally took a fire
hose and watered them down.
Haa. They write lies about him anyway, so it was classic to start a
conference by pulling out a 10 ft bullwhip, glowering at the press,
and axeing, "anybody got a question?"
MrT
|
15.1068 | Classic Knight | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Thu Mar 26 1992 09:51 | 3 |
| So, are the Hoosiers making a run or not ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1069 | sated satyr | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 26 1992 11:59 | 4 |
| Hoosiers have MADE their run. Sweet16 excellent loss so sweet
cain't wait bring on the FSU nukewidebodies !!
MrT
|
15.1070 | It's there! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I'm too tough to tame! | Thu Mar 26 1992 14:48 | 6 |
|
In the dictionary, under Bob Knight, it says...See Jerk!
What a wimp...
B.A.
|
15.1071 | .1069,UGH! | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Thu Mar 26 1992 15:06 | 1 |
|
|
15.1072 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 26 1992 15:20 | 4 |
| Yeah, B.A., when he gave out $75,000 a his own pocket to Landon
Turner when he went down paralyzed... he was being a real jerk.
MrT
|
15.1073 | look what I found | SYOMV::SPRAGUE | | Thu Mar 26 1992 16:42 | 14 |
| Kind of new at this notes thing... I just wanted to see what people though
of IU's chances in the tourney - and instead I'm reading about Stern!!
What a show! When howard asked the slob on the john for a mercy flush, I almost
lost my lunch. How does this show stay on the air ?
Anyway, if Henderson keeps shooting the ball, and Anderson doesn't play like
he's skared of his own shadow, and Baily drops in a occasional tre, and finally
if Nover contributes like he did against the Shack, IU has a chance� for the
final four.
FSU won't even challenge, no discipline. Edwards and Cassall never saw a shot
they didn't like, and no one else is exactly shy. IU by 12.
Stan.
|
15.1074 | WELCOME!!!!! | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Thu Mar 26 1992 17:05 | 11 |
| Hello Stan and welcome to the world of freekin sports lunatics!!!!
Hope ya have fun here and stick around for a long time!
Please put an intro someplace in the beginning of the file, maybe note
2?
I remain,
today's official greeter!
Kev
|
15.1075 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I'm too tough to tame! | Thu Mar 26 1992 17:17 | 10 |
| .1072� Yeah, B.A., when he gave out $75,000 a his own pocket to Landon
.1072� Turner when he went down paralyzed... he was being a real jerk.
You mean out of your pocket if you have anything to do with IU..the
school made that donation.FWIW
He's still a jerk...:*)
B.A.
|
15.1076 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Mar 26 1992 19:21 | 17 |
| This new guy Stan knows his hoops. Vegas has the Hoosiers by
9 1/2. Way I figure it there's a predictive paradox: IU should
win by 12 IF they shoot well, but if FSU's streeballers get on
a roll and go unconscious they could win by 35.
A game a asymmetrical margins is what it is.
You are so RIGHT, sir! Alan is the key. Damon too. If he drops
4 or 5 treys then the inevitable eye-popping 2-3 minute surges by
the 'Noles will be negated, and Indiana weal win cuz a shot selection
and passing lane filling D.
Cassell is one skeery widebody though.
Bring on the 'Noles!!
MrT
|
15.1077 | Bring on the Bruins | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Mar 26 1992 22:43 | 26 |
|
Eric Anderson's the key for the second game in a row, scoring a
season-high 24 as the Hoosiers win by 1 more than the line, and 1 less
than Stan (EXCELLENT prognostication). Calbert Cheaney scores only 2 the
first half (not his fault, according to the coaches) but comes back with
15 in the second half, and also grabs 11 boards as IU outrebounds FSU by
3 or 4. Damon Bailey played most of the game, I assume because he wasn't
doing anything dramatically wrong. He sure as heck wasn't doing anything
dramatically right.
On the post-game show, Norm Ellenberger felt like they played
tentatively the whole game. The hope is that, now that they've gone farther
than last year (one of the pre-season goals), they'll relax for Saturday's
game. He said it's nice to walk away from a big win like this and know you
can play better.
The Noles were truly undisciplined offensively, which was expected,
but I was surprised at the lack of defensive discipline. Serious foul
trouble the whole game, and it was all because reaching is a way of life
for that team.
UCLA (I assume) on Saturday. They had them in November and let them
get away, which has been a common trait for this time. Maybe they can get a
little revenge this time around.
tom
|
15.1078 | What goes around comes around .... | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Stardust, Thats what you are! | Fri Mar 27 1992 00:26 | 6 |
| Norm Ellenberger. Boy is that name a blast from the past. Used to be
head coach here at the PIT. Got in trouble with the NCAA, was out of
coaching for a while. Coached a team in the now defunct women's pro
league. Went to UTEP for a while with the Don Haskins and now surfaces
with Bobby Knight, who almost ended up here in the PIT as head coach
UNM a couple or three years back.
|
15.1079 | Drown a few worms, down a few beers.. | CUBIC7::DIGGINS | In search of the lost chord. | Fri Mar 27 1992 08:29 | 7 |
|
Any man who loves fishing as much as Bob Knight can't be all
that bad.
Steve
|
15.1080 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Mar 27 1992 08:55 | 18 |
| The Hoosiers shot well (27-52) and won by 11. It's telling
that this is with Eric having his game a the season to reach
49% from the field, but on the other hand they missed five
layups and Damon (who has no rotation on his shot) continued his
inconsistency.
It looked bad when Alan picked up his 3rd foul in the first half
banging with FSU's widebodies, but besides the foul trouble he was
holding his own.
The Hoosiers CAIN'T spot UCLA a big early lead, which has indeed
been their habit against nearly all tough opponents since they did
it starting the season against the Bruins.
A good start, good shooting, smart defense, and no fould trouble and
they cain write their ticket to the Final4.
MrT
|
15.1081 | Indiana deserves better than ye of so little faith | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Mar 27 1992 09:03 | 8 |
|
> A good start, good shooting, smart defense, and no fould trouble and
> they cain write their ticket to the Final4.
Wow, your confidence is really picking up steam now, huh, MrT?
glenn
|
15.1082 | Hoosiers did what they had to do. FSU didn't. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Mar 27 1992 09:25 | 18 |
| Nice effort by the Hucksters last night to control FSU. I thought the
Noles really played into their hands by playing their trapping defense
so much. When they've been most effective with it is when they use it
sparringly, springing it only occasionally much to the surprise of the
opponent. Last night, against a team everyone agrees is loaded with
ballhandlers, they tried it early and often, with the result usually
being an easy shot for the Hoosiers. (They missed alot of lay-ups,
BTW.)
Also Sam Cassell's shot selection left *much* to be desired. The shots
he was taking were shots they could've gotten any time, yet he felt the
urge after about 1 pass thru the offense.
All in all, a nice 'W' for IU, but certainly not one_a Pat Kennedy's
better game plans ...
- ACC Chris
|
15.1083 | Good strong win. Cheaney's possessed | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Fri Mar 27 1992 09:36 | 9 |
| Stop Holtzin' it T!
Be proud a ya alma mater. Heh, Heh. Things are looking good fer
me pool. Gots Duke over UK and IU to revenge itself on the UCLAns
Dukies and Hoosiers in Final 4. Bob gits back to the Promised Land
agin his pupil.
MikeL
|
15.1084 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Mar 27 1992 10:09 | 34 |
| Waugamain, nothing's changed in my Hoosier analysis. I've said
all along that this is IU's most talented team in years, probably
their quickest team ever, but that they're unbalanced in the type
a talent they have, i.e., they're small and have no depth up front,
and that they're a so sporadic with their shooting that they're
the kind a team that cain beat most anybody or get mainhandled by
most anybody.
It's like that when you cain't compensate for poor jump shooting with
offensive rebounds and blocked/changed shots and such.
All this holds true for the UCLA game, only more so. You saw the
lack a front-line depth against FSU when Alan got the early three
and went to the bench... never to return. But FSU is also a 3-guard
team, so Bob went to that, leaving both a his ostensible centers (Alan
and Nover) on the bench for the 2nd stanza as GGraham and Damon, 6-4
and 6-2 respectively, went up front.
They won't have that luxury against UCLA, who is much bigger, better
shooting, and deeper. But they cain win if the resuscitated Eric keeps
it up, and nobody gets into early stupid foul trouble.
Notice that Bob is hedging against foul trouble by starting the awful
(but much improved) Matt Nover in the post to pick up the early fouls
against the other squad's true center(s).
McLean Sylvester and, who, Murray? Whoa. They'll need to be at their
best here. In a way they match up against Duke better.
Bob has acquitted himself now. He's got them to the Final8 and is now
going up against a higher seed, a team who blew them away on a neutral
floor this season, a much deeper and more balanced team.
MrT
|
15.1085 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Mar 27 1992 10:20 | 9 |
|
I know your analysis hasn't changed, MrT, and I commend you for that,
but you're actually giving Indiana a chance now if they play well as
opposed to your earlier "imminent middle round elimination at the
hands of the nukewidebody studs". Glad to see that you can still be a
fan, too...
glenn
|
15.1086 | Will you admit it if they snip the nets in Minny ??? | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Fri Mar 27 1992 10:27 | 3 |
| So, Po', are they making a run now or what ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1087 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Mar 27 1992 10:39 | 42 |
| Waugamain my prediction thus far is only one game off (and I hope it
ends up 3 games off) but the analysis holds in that somehow Bob has
gotten this team righted just as it entered the tourney, and it's now
shooting very well - something that with this team could change in a
second to a abrupt end.
Setting the shooting aside, what has happened thru the Big10 season
(we have a real conference season in the Big10, not a 5 day season like
the Big8 or Almost Close for example) has been encouraging, things
that have built up over the last two months:
- After early awful floor game play (and a psycho insanity abusive
benching by Bob) Calbert has gone on a mission rebounding and
defending - his best performance EVER was the D he put on JJ during
the Blmgtn. game.
- Alan Henderson may be 30 lbs underweight, but he's wiry strong and
tough minded and has emerged as a force. We knew he could shoot,
but he has dispelled any lingering doubts whether somebody that thin
could bang inside. He's got talent in his great timing, especially
jumping, and great hands. Alex English was skinny too.
Henderson's emergence has given them a true front-line, if lacking
a creditable substitute up front. Quinn Buckner was probably right
last night when he traced Eric's terrible shooting woes to, after
3 years, finally moving to his true position and playing facing the
basket.
- The team has settled into its roles. Especially among the guards,
where they have only one complete player in GGraham, but also
including Nover and Damon playing up front. Matt Nover has little
or no talent, but about mid-way through this season he suddenly
became an effective role player, no longer making the stupid passes
failed pass catches stupid fouls freak out turnovers dribbles of the
foot desperation shots in non-desperation situations. He's now
playing a clean game, within his limits.
- The emergence of fairly decent rebounding. Eric is boarding better
than ever, ditto Calbert, and they have a true windex main in Alan.
Damon and GGraham are as always crashing the boards.
MrT
|
15.1088 | | SYOMV::SPRAGUE | | Fri Mar 27 1992 10:56 | 22 |
| Like I said, Cassall and Edwards never saw a shot they didn't like (or take)
and the incredible lack of discipline and inovation on offence would be the
downfall of FSU. Kind of reminded me of Dale Brown's intricate offence last
week. But I was a litte off IU only won by 11.
Lets here it for Eric Anderson. After single handedly losing the Michgan
game, then teaming with Baily to loose the Purdue game, loosing his starting
job, and looking like he was afraid to take a free throw 1 week ago, he comes
out shootin the rock, and leading IU to victory.
I'm encouraged, last night, Hendersone stunk, Baily stunk, Renolds stunk,
Graham was ok, Cheney was average, Nover may not have suited up, Meeks played
well, and Anderson was great -- and the still won by 11.
UCLA will be tough. Baily and Graham are going to have to contribute.
Hendersone may again be the key. Cheney and Anderson should almost offset
the M+M boys, so the role players will decide the outcome.
I don't know why, but I have a hunch the winner of this game could very well
be our national champ ?
Stan.
|
15.1089 | Seen too many open 3's this year ... :^( | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Mar 27 1992 11:08 | 6 |
| The one aspect of Indiana's game that I really like is there great
perimeter defense, which *really* comes in handy with the 3-point shot
innovation.
- ACC Chris
|
15.1090 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Fri Mar 27 1992 11:35 | 12 |
| Be atough game for IU vs. UCLA. But next to Howard Miner and USC, Don
American Pie, Tracey Murray,and the rest of the Bruins are even easier
to dislike. The key to UCLA is Murray - and not McLean. The team
feeds off of Murray. Get him into early foul trouble - if I was Bobby
K. - I'd try to get Calbert isolated on Murray. Murray is simply a
horrible defender, and will hack away in his attempt to stop the
offense. But he cain killya with those threes...
BTW, Bobby's press conference was another classic. ANother big
difference between Knight and Snuffy Smif. Bobby has a personality.
JD
|
15.1091 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Mar 27 1992 15:18 | 15 |
|
Expect the Hoosiers to pack it in early against the Bruins and make
them show they can hit the outside shot in a big game. Unless Murray and
Maclean really light it up, keeping them outside also keeps them off the
offensive boards.
The transition game was what beat IU in the November matchup. If
they do the offensive things they need to do to slow UCLA down --- protect
the ball, shoot a reasonable percentage on shots they get by running the
offense, and hit the offensive boards a little bit --- it should be a good
game. If UCLA's transition game gets going, though, it could be lights out.
The Hoosiers transition defense has been shaky all year, and UCLA's run the
break well when I've watched them.
tom
|
15.1092 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Fri Mar 27 1992 16:34 | 8 |
| Tom -
Murray was the PAC10's highest percentage 3-point field goal shooter.
Letting him bomb from outside might be suicide. If Murray gets going,
the Bruins are hard to stop. However, Murray seems to get frustrated
easy.
JD
|
15.1093 | Coulda fooled me | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now!!! | Sat Mar 28 1992 19:11 | 13 |
| Indiana 106, UCLA 79
Looks like a title run, smells like a title run, cracks a bullwhip like a
title run ... Geez, it's too bad the Hoosiers suck so badly otherwise I'd
say they're making a title run ... which a certain yours truly noter has
been calmly insisting would happen all along.
But, alas, it's not ... 'cause of course they're .. what is it ??? ... Oh,
yeah, they're slow on the wings, weak inside and cain't shoot for sheet.
C'mon, Po', are they making a run or not ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1094 | | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I'm too tough to tame! | Sat Mar 28 1992 19:32 | 5 |
|
B.Knight is still a jerk!
B.A.
|
15.1095 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Sun Mar 29 1992 13:33 | 25 |
| Witch, I have never said that Indiana is slow on the wings. This
is the quickest Hoosier team ever.
UCLA played a dirty gutless game yesterday. The refs let them get
away with several outrageous cheap shots early in the game (MacDirty
flings an elbow at Eric's haid, Madkins goes through a pick throwing
his hands up in Damon's face, Murray swings and elbow at Alan's haid,
MacDirty flings Alan to the floor, MacDirty elbows Alan and then talks
trash to him going up the floor, with senior Jamaal stepping in only
to pick up a T, then, with a foul finally being called, MacDirty throws
yet another elbow, this time connecting, and gets only a intentional
foul instead a thrown out a the game).
And when it was over they're blaming it on the elevation as if the
Hoosiers were playing at sea level.
Career games for Nover, Henderson, and Anderson. Best game the squad's
played all year, best defense they've played in a long long time. I
think UCLA dirty cheaty approach to the game really backfired on them.
Quinn Buckner said it best when MacDirty got the intentional call,
"when things aren't going your way, you should just take it like a main
a accept it instead of pulling stunts like that."
MrT
|
15.1096 | | SYOMV::SPRAGUE | | Sun Mar 29 1992 17:56 | 30 |
| "Ditto" to eveything MrT said. Macdirty never got it going,
got frustrated and started jawin' and throwin' elbows. Murry
to his credit stuck with it and toughed it out for a few points.
How bout that hoosier perimiter D. No easy shots for the M&M
boyz. MrT noted Nover, Henderson and Andersons efforts,
I'd like to mention Damon played real well. Lets here it
for Digger who on the pregame show who said something like "IU
will win easy, and Baily will have a huge game". After watching
ten years or so of ND Basketball I was ready to conclude
Digger knew nothin bout hoops.
As long as we're on the pregame show, nice to see Dale Brown
put marble mouth Walton in his place. Everyone takes shots
at Dale, and he certainly isn't the greatest x&o's coach,
but he is, the most positive, upbeat, likable guy around,
and didn't deserve Walton blasting him for an entire week.
Back to the game... watching Henderson Dominate the paint w/
rebounds and block shots brings back memories of DC (thats Derick
Coleman for you non upstate new yorker's) grabin' 19 boards against
IU in '87. Nover looked like a player, and Calbert was his steady
self. You heard it here first, IU beats Duke by a tre. UK proved
Duke's beatable and exposed some weakneses. (Like for instance, a
ultra quick point guard can beat Hurley like a rented mule.) Also
The monster mash out quicked Laetner to many rebounds - Alan will
have to do the same. Man for man Duke is probably a better club,
but the best club rarely wins this tourney. Give BK a week, and he
could beat the Bulls.(alright, maybe the Knicks).
Stan.
|
15.1097 | That was a clinic ... and it was *no* accident. | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now!!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 02:50 | 12 |
| � Witch, I have never said that Indiana is slow on the wings. This
� is the quickest Hoosier team ever.
Perhaps so. But I've spent all season long predicting a Hoosier title run
and you've spent just as much time convincing no one but yourself that
they just cain't do it.
Be a main now and admit da troof. Knight's been prepping for this run
for several years now and some of us could see it coming despite all the
soiled sand that's been pounded into cheep burlap bags around here.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1098 | So much for the Big Ten champs | SHALOT::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now!!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 03:12 | 20 |
| Congratulations to the Big Ten for placing 2 teams in the Final Four.
Very impressive run by the conference this year. Michigan is downright
scary and ought to be able to dispatch of the Bearcats while the Duke-IU
matchup ought to be one of the best of all time.
I don't suppose it will solve the endless urination contest over the ACC
Tournament vs the Big Ten round-robin but it should be noted that at least
the ACC placed its champion in Minnesota. The Big Ten's champ is on a
bus ride home.
Indiana's loss to Purdue was the best thing that could have happened to
them. They might not have survived the Southeast Region had they won the
Big Ten. Going out west meant fewer distractions and perhaps slightly
less pressure as the No 2 seed. And then Knight was brilliant, of
course, in focusing the media circus on him instead of on the players ...
The bullwhip and the hilarious "game" faces were priceless.
Wonder if Cheaney will be running laps in practice Monday ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1099 | hail | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Mon Mar 30 1992 09:52 | 16 |
| hard to believe that a team that lost by 20 to Wisconsin late in the
season is now in the final four!
Hats off to Steve Fisher, the team continues to play focused and in
control for all 40 minutes. I have a lot more respect for him now,
I don't think Bill Frieder would have been capable of bringing this
team this far.
This team is so much fun to watch, I hope they all stick around for
a few years.
I would love to see an all big ten final. While Laettner certainly
deserves to be suspended, I hope he doesn't so Duke doesn't have any
excuses.
-dennis
|
15.1100 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Mar 30 1992 10:42 | 3 |
| Just remember 1 thing about this Michigan team. If they all don't
turn pro early, we might be in for a long run a titles here.
Denny
|
15.1101 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Who can turn the world on w/ her smile? | Mon Mar 30 1992 10:48 | 1 |
| Let's go Blue!!!
|
15.1102 | I'll be rooting for Indiana, but still... | SHALOT::MEDVID | Dancing in the deepest oceans | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:24 | 10 |
| Why does Laettner deserve to be suspended? What he did was
unsportsmanlike for sure and I have formed a new opinion of the jerk,
but the proper punishment was handed out as would be handed out to any
other player...a technical foul, two shots and the ball.
If the Kentucky player had gotten up and started swinging and Laettner
swung back, then, as the NCAA rules state, both would be suspended. As
for this incident, it was handled very appropriately (i.e. by the book).
--dan'l
|
15.1103 | Expect Laettner to play, but it looks bad... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:33 | 20 |
|
> Why does Laettner deserve to be suspended? What he did was
> unsportsmanlike for sure and I have formed a new opinion of the jerk,
> but the proper punishment was handed out as would be handed out to any
> other player...a technical foul, two shots and the ball.
The main reason being given is that UConn's Rod Sellers was suspended
last year for a very similar incident after a review of the tapes of
their game with Duke. I heard Billy Packer and company saying yesterday
that this was somehow different because it was handled on the court by
the officials. That's a very weak rationale. Since when does a
technical foul equal a game suspension for the same offense? The NCAA
is caught in a serious bind whichever way they go on this one.
Just curious about the feelings in here, since the Sellers incident was
discussed in detail last year... Did you think the suspension was
justified then?
glenn
|
15.1104 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:36 | 9 |
| Dan'l-
I think Laettner should be suspended because Sellers of UCONN was
suspended for a_intentional foul in last year's tourney - he sat out
UCONN's first game. The message seems to be "Touch Chrissy, get
suspended, but Chrissy cain do it and get away from it - and get
praised by the announcers..."
JD
|
15.1105 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:38 | 19 |
| Before the tourney, I said that Eric Anderson had to start hitting for
IU to have a chance. He's been hitting.
Knight's been great. the game faces were fantastic. The bull-whip
thing is blown out of proportion, and the NCAAP once again does the
knee-jerk without looking at the whole picture.
Denny -
As I said earlier, IMO, Michigan better win it this year. I predict
nothing from them in the future if they don't. Rose and Webber are
the top candidates to go pro.
in general, how does this affect Michigan recruiting? Why go to a
school that has a ton of guys only a year older than you in the
starting lineup?
JD
|
15.1106 | the rationality shoul have been severity not he already got punished | CNTROL::CHILDS | Hulkster is Blubster w/out vitamins | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:43 | 10 |
|
JD, small nit but Sellers wasn't called for anything last year. Given that
Sellers repeatedly slammed Laettner he deserved what he got. Laettner on
the other hand did get punished for what he did. I look at the severity
of the offenses, Sellers was trying to harm Laettner, Laettner on the other
hand was sending a message that he wasn't none too happy about being undercut.
He didn't kick him as hard as he could have and wasn't trying to injury the
other player in my mind so the punishment fits the crime here. No Suspension
mike
|
15.1107 | | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:07 | 13 |
| The bullshit about Seller's suspension is that no foul was ever called.
Hell, if CBS hadn't have shown the replay so many times nothing would
have come of it.
IMO, the NCAA at that point was like those dweebs who call up the PGA
when they see some rules infraction on TV....
Laettner is the fair-haired boy. You won't see the NCAA reviewing any
of this to suspend him in his next game....
'Saw
|
15.1108 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:17 | 5 |
| I guess I get this feeling that say if, oh, Alonzo Mourning had stomped
on a guy's stomach, that the refs would have chucked him out without
batting a_eyelash.
JD
|
15.1109 | It was a classic | SHALOT::MEDVID | twisting in the water | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:33 | 4 |
| All this talk of the Laettner incident is taking away from what was one
of the greatest games in the history of the NCAA tournament. Shame.
--dan'l
|
15.1110 | Laettner is the root of all of American's problems | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:38 | 10 |
| Dan'l
It was a great game. But there were lots of great games in the
tourney. Georgia Tech was in a few of them. The tech-Memphis State
game was a great game. And incidents like Laettner's do take away
from the game. There is no place for cheap shots like that. His
stomping, IMO, detracts from his last second shot. Shows that cheaters
cain win - the 'merican way.
JD
|
15.1111 | Can't wait for nexted weekend... | SASE::SZABO | Frank Way is the write-in way! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:38 | 7 |
| I agree dan'l. It's also a shame that all the negatives about the
teams seem to be brought up, nothing good, nothing positive. Doesn't
anybody enjoy anything anymore? Personally, I've found this to be the
most enjoyable March Madness in quite some time...
Hawk
|
15.1112 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball is a legend | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:40 | 8 |
|
Oh Definitely JD Mourning would probably get jail time. I want
Duke to beat Indiana but the NCAA should remain consistent and seeing
they bounced Sellers for a game Christy should be gone too.
Chappy...
|
15.1113 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:44 | 25 |
| Hawk -
For you.
Wasn't it great seeing Cincy and Memphis State battling for the Final
Four? Two schools that arent' among the 'normal' power elite.
Was Georgia Tech in the most exciting games of the tourney, or what.
And Travis Best is a PLAYER.
If you can't get to a TV, the radio coverage of the NCAA's is
excellent. I enjoyed it.
Anfernee Hardaway is a hoops player. A little out of control at times,
but the man can pass.
Van Excel and Jones are great players on the Bearcats.
Calipiri and Pitino seem to be both cut from the same mold. Pitino's
comments after the loss to Duke were very good. A loss like that
shouldn't be the end of the world.
JD
|
15.1114 | Laetner with a line through him | JURAN::MCKAY | | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:45 | 9 |
| Sellars did not deserve the suspension. I loved poor little Chrissy
taking a few forearms to the head.
Laetner won't be suspended, should he be? Yes, since Sellars was the
precedent has been set. I'd rather no one ever was suspended for
any tourney game unless fighting was the cause. I want to see Duke
lose with the team intact!
Jimbo
|
15.1115 | | RUGBY1::way | Shore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:47 | 13 |
| Laettner should be gone.
Asked Denny what I kept saying at the Game on Saturday, everytime
Svoboda or Pressley tried to goon it up with the Broons:
Cheaters Never Prosper
At least that's the way it's supposed to work....
'Saw
|
15.1116 | Much better, JD. Didn't that feel good now? :-) | SASE::SZABO | Frank Way is the write-in way! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:51 | 1 |
|
|
15.1117 | :-) :-) :-) | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:59 | 3 |
| How was the coverage on CBC, JD ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1118 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:01 | 8 |
| Bob -
HAHAHAH. The CBC had coverage of teh Ice Skating Champeenships, and
the curling, and evena report on the softball. And hockey.
JD
|
15.1119 | Christian Laimbeer? | SASE::SZABO | Frank Way is the write-in way! | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:11 | 14 |
| > How was the coverage on CBC, JD ???
Had I not seen it for myself (on CBS), I would've been envisioning the
Choirboy doing a triple-inverted-double-secret suplex on the Kentucky
guy from JD's apparent outrage. Maybe that's what CBC did show? :-)
On a serious note, from an NBA perspective, is this display of
aggression of Laettner's good, bad, or indifferent? In other words,
does his "stock" rise in the eyes of the teams that have a shot at
picking him, or does it hurt him? IMO, if I was a GM, I'd view it
favorably...
Hawk
|
15.1120 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:23 | 13 |
| Haawk -
ONly thing - if he tried that in the NBA he'd get his butt kicked.
Every team has some sort of enforcer type - can you imagine him doing
that to PHilly, or Detroit, of Chicago? Someone would mop the floor
with his face.
Of course, the jury's out on his pro stock, IMO. Mainly due to Duke's
track record for pros. Alarie and Ferry come to mind right away. I'm
not sure he's physical enoubht ot play inside with the really big boys
in the NBA. But he's a talent. Perhaps he should follow Ferry's
lead and opt for the ravioli circuit.
JD
|
15.1121 | 6'-11" with an outside shot == NBA | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:40 | 22 |
| � Of course, the jury's out on his pro stock, IMO. Mainly due to Duke's
� track record for pros. Alarie and Ferry come to mind right away. I'm
� not sure he's physical enoubht ot play inside with the really big boys
� in the NBA. But he's a talent. Perhaps he should follow Ferry's
� lead and opt for the ravioli circuit.
He's taller than both Ferry and Alarie. That alone keeps him on this side
of the Atlantic.
Before this season, I would have had the same hesitations about his pro
stock given Ferry's apparent flop but Laettner went out this past summer
and developed a college trey. He led the country, I believe, in trey
accuracy. The NBA will salivate over that skill. Depending on team
needs, he's a lottery pick. Probably top 5 but could go somewhere
between 7 and 10 just as easily.
John Wooden was quoted as saying he thinks the foot stomp might have cost
Laettner the national POY trophy but the buzzer shot probably sealed it
regardless. I haven't seen someone with this kind of ability to deliver in
the clutch in a very long time. Ice cold. Scary.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1122 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Hulkster is Blubster w/out vitamins | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:45 | 10 |
|
I don't know JD you might be the only one in that jury. Ferry and Aliare
were statsman glamour boys. They were never able to raise their own or
their teams level of play when the game was on the line. Laettner gets the
tough board for ya, blocks a few shots, does whatever his team needs out
of him to win. Bottom line is he takes the game personally with his heart
the other two never could. He's got the tools, he's got the heart I don't
see him missing or needing the spagetti league....
mike
|
15.1123 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | Julie's in the Drug Squad | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:48 | 7 |
|
Laettner is a leadpipe cinch to be a lottery pick. As far as any
comparisons to Ferry or Alarie, Laettner has a national title under
his belt, 'nuff said. Is he cocky and arrogant ? Yeah, but he's as got
as good a combination of the inside and outside game as anyone in
college ball.
|
15.1124 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 30 1992 13:59 | 28 |
|
> Before this season, I would have had the same hesitations about his pro
> stock given Ferry's apparent flop but Laettner went out this past summer
> and developed a college trey. He led the country, I believe, in trey
> accuracy. The NBA will salivate over that skill. Depending on team
> needs, he's a lottery pick. Probably top 5 but could go somewhere
> between 7 and 10 just as easily.
I would be stunned if Laettner falls from the top 5 picks. I think
the NBA types believe he's for real. They'll overlook his lack of
bulk for his height and his shooting touch. Height alone has prompted
NBA teams to draft complete stiffs fairly high, and Laettner has proved
that he's no stiff.
All the talk about Laettner's indiscretion in Saturday's game does not
detract one iota from the greatness of the game, in my opinion. If
anything it'll just make it more memorable, providing one more unusual
incident and a little bit of controversy for the ages to a game that
already had so much that was out of the ordinary. What happened
shouldn't or needn't be forgotten and Laettner forgiven just because
he turned out to be the hero later in the game. There's no reason to
have to portray the winners as good guys just to make a better story
of a great story. I don't know if Laettner does or doesn't fit the
role (and really don't care), but sometimes the guys in the black hats
win too...
glenn
|
15.1125 | but Joubert graduated, right? | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Mon Mar 30 1992 14:12 | 19 |
| I agree with the previous replys. I don't think Sellers deserved to
be suspended either, but the NCAA should be consistant. But at the same
time, I don't want Duke to be shorthanded, that would take away from
the eventual winners. Maybe they should just make him shave his
sideburns...
Laettner is a much better player than I ever thought he was, but he
has absolutely no class. I hope he ends up in Sacramento where I never
have to see him again.
Webber outplayed Laettner in the game in Ann Arbor. Both players have
gotten better since then. It would be great finale.
Michigan has at least one more year in the spotlight. I hope that the
current players have learned something from Eric Turner and Sean
Higgins. Good point about the recruiting, but they always seem to
bounce back. Since Frieder took over, I think they've only had really
bad recruiting year (last year) when they bet the bank on Montross and
lost. But then again, that one bad year was worth this year, eh?
|
15.1126 | Could be | SCNDRL::HUNT | Stop The ACC Tourney Now !!! | Mon Mar 30 1992 14:15 | 12 |
| � I would be stunned if Laettner falls from the top 5 picks. I think
� the NBA types believe he's for real.
I think you're right, Glenn. It does depend on the underclassmen coming
out, though. If JJ and Shaq come out, they both go Top 5. Teams might
have needs to fill besides what Christian Laettner can provide, too.
But you're right ... I was just sand-bagging on the 7-thru-10 pick
thought. I been reading too many Po' notes lately and it's become
second (or is that third, no wait ... fourth ...) nature.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1127 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ABD - Anybody But Duke! | Mon Mar 30 1992 14:25 | 16 |
| What positioin will Lawtner play in the pros? I'd dink he'd be more
of a forward than a center. As Bob said, he'll go top 5, depending on
who comes out early. I think he's a team-dependent type pick -
inotherwords, I don't expect stardom no matter what - but if he gets
into the right position, he'll do okay. One team that would be okay
for him would be Philly - if they keep Barkley. But even then I'm not
too sure. Of course, he'd be a perfect Celtic [isfh].
He'd be perfect for Golden State - but he'll be long gone. With
Nelson's offense, he'd be a weapon. He'll turn moldy if he goes to
places like Milwaukee.
I'd like to see as the small forward on the KNicks, but he'd be too
slow to cover some most of the small forwards in the league.
JD
|
15.1128 | Take it where it belongs | SHALOT::MEDVID | twisting in the water | Mon Mar 30 1992 14:39 | 5 |
| Hey, guys, how about taking this talk over to the ACC note where it
belongs. This note should be left for the deserving Fab Five and the
clinic-giving Hoosiers...and for T's obfuscations on the title run.
--dan'l
|
15.1129 | | ROYALT::ASHE | The V X'z boyz rool! | Mon Mar 30 1992 15:18 | 7 |
| Yeah, otherwise, dan'l and I will talk about UNCC, their Golddiggers,
Marlu Dottin and the rest of the team... (ha ha)...
Still can't see how everyone can get on Laettner's case and not mention
the head butt Jent laid on Howard. Superfly Snuka or Dusty Rhodes
would have been proud...
|
15.1130 | Fabulous 4 includes a FAB 5 whatayaknow!!! | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Mar 30 1992 21:38 | 25 |
|
.-1
That head butting incident showed some maturity on Howard's part.
Early in the year he might have gotten himself kicked outta the game
'cause of retaliation. Could be because the ref. got there in a hurry
just as well.
The FAB 5 are playing considerably better defense at this point in the
season. That window of dissarray is getting smaller(ex. OSU 11-0 run)
and they have gotten to the point where they won't let that run take
them out of the game. I thought the refs. were going to take the game
Friday and suv it on a platta.
The 'rines will love playing a team like cincinnati who likes the open
court kind of game. Cincinnati would be playing Michigan right into a
Champeenship game. I think Michigan would rather play Duke than IU but
would have confidence against either. Overtime loss to Duke early in
the year and Avenged a loss to IU in Crisler arena. Only IU is hitting
on all cylinders now.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BlUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roy L.
Congrats Cincinnati, IU, and Duke fans
|
15.1131 | | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Tue Mar 31 1992 09:38 | 2 |
| Cincinatti could give Michigan a run for their money, this game is
certainly not a lock. Anyone see a point spread yet?
|
15.1132 | | MONGUS::BRYDIE | Julie's in the Drug Squad | Tue Mar 31 1992 10:18 | 5 |
|
>> Anyone see a point spread yet?
According to this morning's Globe, Michigan is a three point
favorite and Duke is a two point favorite.
|
15.1133 | Duke favored; see The Line | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Tue Mar 31 1992 12:05 | 0 |
15.1134 | A hand for Steve Fisher | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Wed Apr 01 1992 19:07 | 14 |
| Fab Five seem to have a decent following amid the fresh success. I
think that something however small has been overlooked. The coaching
of Steve Fisher. I think he looked absolutely like a terrible coach
early to mid season but as time goes on he looks better and better.
Granted he has some awsome talent but they are freshman and very few
have taken freshmen this far. Many coaches wouldn't have the balls to
start 5 freshmen(ie tobaca ruins). It is apparent that Fisher has been
teaching by the defenses the wolves are playing and the better shot
selections that are happening. I think he did a good job of not
suppressing all of their talents and allowed them to make some early
mistakes. While not a great X and O guy I think Fisher's getting
better.
Roy L.
|
15.1135 | | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | BearCats 2 wins away | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:34 | 9 |
|
Don't take the BearCats lightly.. Michigan fans. The Cats should show
the Fab-5 some of the tightest pressure D they've seen all year, and
it'll be interesting to see how the youngsters react.
Hopefully, the Fab-5 is taking the BearCats as lightly as their fans
seem to be...
/Jeff
|
15.1136 | I'd like to see Fisher bald... | DTIF::MCEVOY | | Thu Apr 02 1992 09:36 | 4 |
| Howard and King are supposed to join Webber and Rose in the shaved head
club for saturday, Jackson says no way.
|
15.1137 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Apr 02 1992 13:17 | 9 |
| It should be pointed out that Cincinnati features eight juco
transfers on its squad. The Big10 has a rule that requires
jucos who at matriculation did not meet the Big10's academic
guidelines to sit out a year as if they were Prop48. This rule
expires in August, and, if the NCAA continues to endorse low
academics, may be forced to suspend this rule, which is unique
among power conferences.
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.1138 | scandalous | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Thu Apr 02 1992 13:21 | 5 |
| What's this "may be forced" stuff, T? You mean that in the interest in
money and more money the Big10 might compromise its integrity and lower
itself to the NCAA standards?
TTom
|
15.1139 | GOOOOOOOO BlUUUUUUUEEEEEEEE | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 13:57 | 12 |
| RE: .1135
I don't think the Bearcats are being taken lightly but I do think they
have a general lack of respect. I think that's due more than anything
to lack of press clippings. Of the final four, Duke is the reigning
National Champ, Indiana has Bob Knight, Michigan has five well
publicized freshman but Cincinnati has generate a marquee appeal. It's
apparent that they are a good basketball team at 29-4 but they will
have to earn respect all the way to a championship.
Roy L.
|
15.1140 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Carolina Blew | Thu Apr 02 1992 13:57 | 16 |
| That's r-right, TTom. The Big10 may be forced to lower its
quality standards in order to keep up with the other power
conferences, you know, like the Big Lease and the Almost Close.
Competitive fairness. Now, doan git me wrong, this'll have no
effect on the Michigans and Ohio States who're rolling big-time
on the recruiting front. But may prove necessary for Bob, whom
everybody agrees is a awful recruiter at his level, to dip into
the juco ranks in order to tab that elusive nukewidebody or maybe
a center who cain move his feet without looking like he's walking
in a vat a molasses.
I say dump the rule and help the Minnesotas and Wisconsins and
Illinoises and Indianas try to keep up with Ann Arbor and Columbus.
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.1141 | Let's have a little perspective... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 14:19 | 17 |
|
> Competitive fairness. Now, doan git me wrong, this'll have no
> effect on the Michigans and Ohio States who're rolling big-time
> on the recruiting front. But may prove necessary for Bob, whom
Don't forget about my main mens Paterno and Parkhill! Those two are
going to lend a whole new meaning the term NukeWideBodyStud (well,
maybe Paterno moreso than Parkhill...) ;-)
By the way, dealing with more important matters than this Big Ten hoops
business, the grid skeds for 1993-94 have been released: State will be
taking on everyone 'cept creampuffs Wisconsin and Purdue each of the
first two years. Indoctrination the right mainly way-- including the
beast Michigan at home in '93!
glenn
|
15.1142 | Lets check it out | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 15:17 | 5 |
| Glen,
If time and desire exist can ya post that grid sched. in note 15.
Roy L.
|
15.1143 | -.1 make that note 16 | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Thu Apr 02 1992 15:35 | 1 |
|
|
15.1144 | Indiana has most talent of Final Four | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Thu Apr 02 1992 15:43 | 9 |
| What's this I read?
Under the title of "No Big Macs", a blurb reported that Cincinnati had no
MacDonald's all americans. Duke and Michigan each have 4.
Indiana, that no talent, white guys can't jump, type of team lead the
Final Four with 5, count 'em, 5 Big Mac Genuine All-Ams.
TTom
|
15.1145 | Great-MidWest proved to be one of toughest conf. in the NCAA | HYDRA::HAUSRATH | BearCats 2 wins away | Thu Apr 02 1992 16:12 | 18 |
|
re:-1
Not too terribly suprising.. Cincy gets by on the strength of their
TEAM defense, not on the ability of individual superstars.
Of their four losses, two were by 1 point, in games they never should
have lost (Michigan St. and DePaul). The other two were @DePaul and
Indiana. Tough wins on their schedule included in-conference
match-ups with UAB, Memphis State, and Marquette and out of conference
games against the likes of Xavier OH (granted they were somewhat down
this year) and Miami (OH). I'm sure there were other tough games that
I can't remember and a number of cup-cakes too.
Guess we'll know how they stack up against the "big boys" (or should
that be "baby boys"?) on Saturday.
/Jeff
|
15.1146 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Thu Apr 02 1992 20:31 | 9 |
| One of them AA's TTom is sitting on the end of the bench in street
clothes; Pat Graham their best outside shooter was redshirted this
year.
So Duke, IU and Michigan each have 4. Cincy just has 8 very good
college jucos on their squad.
IU has the style to give Duke problems. If they shoot better than 50%,
I think they will win.
|
15.1147 | Who knows? They *could* be on a roll | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Sat Apr 04 1992 15:56 | 8 |
| Wail, I aim off to the Dome in a few minutes. I give the
disciplined Hoosiers 1 outta 3 in this one. If they play
like the UCLA game they cain do it. Here's hoping for good
shooting and no fould trouble up front...
Wish me luck!
MrT
|
15.1148 | I *HATE* B-ball withdrawal! | DYPSS1::SIMPSON | | Sun Apr 05 1992 13:22 | 31 |
|
Well, it was a disappointing end to an up-and-down season. The
Hoosiers played a nice first half, even without getting Cheaney into the
action, but the bad judgement when they had the ball and an 8-point lead
with no shot clock at the end of the first half was the clear turning point.
If they'd held the ball for the last shot and gone in with an 8-10 point lead,
MAYBE they could have weathered Duke's run at the start of the second half (if
there was one) and played Monday night. As it was the quick, bad shot turned
into 3 on the other end, and they were scrambling to hold onto the 5-point
lead. They then reacted badly to some adversity, as they have so often this
year; the shooting went south, as it has so often this year; and they ended up
with a mountain that was too big to climb.
You have to give the Dukies credit, of course. As always, when the
Blue Devils need a player to step up and make the plays, someone responds.
They look very beatable, but they just keep on winning. And, as I've often
said, they don't give style points in b-ball. They just look at the final
score and see who has the most.
On the positive side, the 3-game run to the Final Four was as much
fun as I've ever had watching Indiana play, and they played better in that
stretch than any IU team in a long time. And, the fact that the Hoosiers
were able to turn around the end-of-season slump and make a great run in the
tournament may bode well for next season. The players most responsible for
that turn-around will be back, and overall they may gain more than they lose.
PGraham will be a big help offensively, but they'll have to find a way to
replace Eric Anderson's interior defense.
tom
|
15.1149 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Yeah, da Tew Yutes .... | Sun Apr 05 1992 17:27 | 4 |
| Looks like Knight pulled a reverse-Smif' by not putting in that kid
bomber (I forget his name) until too late. Three straight 3's, the last
one was a double-clutch job with a main hanging all over him. I had to
admit, that last minute was great stuff, pity it didn't go to OT ...
|
15.1150 | Great Game | RDOVAX::BRAKE | | Mon Apr 06 1992 09:03 | 15 |
| Really impressed by the IU/Duke game. Great intensity by both teams.
Hard to say which team was better. In hindsight, many may fault KB
(King Bob) but his outburst "could" have stopped Duke's mementum, also.
I think KB sensed his team was losing it and tried to fire them up.
'Course, KB bashers will simply look at the "T" called on him and blame
him for the loss.
Coach K continues to impress me. This guy is one heck of a motivator
albeit totally different than KB.
Looks like Duke forward Brian Davis is out for tonights game. Duke's
best defensive player will be missed.
Rich
|
15.1151 | 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 06 1992 10:29 | 6 |
| Yea Doc,
That kid throwin up them three pointers for AhU was clutch. Must
come from good stock. Whatsisname??
MikeL
|
15.1152 | Good game | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Mon Apr 06 1992 12:51 | 16 |
| You were right, Po'. They weren't making a run. Too bad because they
would have made a great story. And I think Knight would have out-coached
Fisher before the game even started.
Duke sure can turn up the defensive heat when they need to and they sure
as hell needed to on Saturday. Knight's first-half effort was sublime
right up until they let the 12-point lead slip back to 5.
Did Billy Packer really say that no one squares up on the trey better than
Damon Bailey ??? I guess Bobby Hurley wasn't listening 'cause he torched
the Hoosiers from treyville.
A good game and the 2nd time in a row that a student has beaten the
mentor.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1153 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:53 | 3 |
| Er, CoachK was 0-1 vs. Bob going into Friday's game.
Big10 Tom
|
15.1154 | Clarification | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:58 | 9 |
| � Er, CoachK was 0-1 vs. Bob going into Friday's game.
Nope, that's not what I meant. I was referring to lasted year's
delicious Snuffout delivered by Roy Williams in Indy.
With Krzyzewski turning the tables on his mentor, that makes two straight
years we've seen this happen.
Bob Hunt
|
15.1155 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 06 1992 17:00 | 9 |
| So T,
How's about yer semifinal eyewitness analysis from da luxury box?
Hope you was all bedecked in red.
MikeL
|
15.1156 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Apr 06 1992 17:01 | 39 |
| Whoa, wait a minute. The TO called was NOT called on Bob.
It was called on the bench cuz two guys on the end of the
bench leaped up at a non-call on a Hurley play as they were
going up court. Amazingly, the ref himself informed both
Calbert and Bob that the T was for jumping off the bench, and
not for anything that was said cuz the ref sez he didn't hear
anything.
You're right on one thing though, it *did* prove to be the game.
Amazing. Certain teams spend the entire game standing and
giving officiating signals in protest, and in a game a that
magnitude the ref blows the whistle for two players jumping
up, giving no signals, and saying nothing.
The game was over in the first 3 minutes anyway. All those soft
foul calls did this:
- Put nearly the entire starting lineup on the bench, which meant
IU was shuttling the rest a the way and never got back into the
flow.
- Put Duke into the 1-and-1 with 14:30 left.
- Put Duke into the 2-shot foul situation with 12 minutes left.
And Indiana still nearly pulled it off. Both Bob and Calbert made
veiled references to the officiating, but would speak no further.
The Cheaney charging call was bogus. It was right in front a me,
and it was a move he's made his entire career: fake, drive the baseline
and jump straight up for the J and shoot. Trouble was, a Dukie came
up on him and they rubbed a bit and even though Calbert was in the air
before the guy moved in and the contact was minor and incidental he
got called for the foul (his 4th).
Go Blue.
MrT
|
15.1157 | Blue definitely wins it tonight ... unless OT, then tomorrow | SHALOT::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Mon Apr 06 1992 17:12 | 16 |
| � The Cheaney charging call was bogus. It was right in front a me, and it
� was a move he's made his entire career: fake, drive the baseline and jump
� straight up for the J and shoot.
I agree. And Packer kept insisting that everything was okay since at
least the refs were calling it that way all night long on both sides.
Bullsheet, Billy. If three refs screw up a call all night long and, by
chance, it doesn't affect the game, then they were fortunate, that's all.
I thought they blew just about every charging call situation they saw.
� Go Blue.
Good one. Learn that from Knorr ???
Bob Hunt
|
15.1158 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Easy come easy go, will you let me go? | Mon Apr 06 1992 18:38 | 3 |
| I go thru all these notes and no-one mentions Michigan? Fine, no
bandwagon jumpers allowed without a note from Mom...
|
15.1159 | EXCUSES 101 | RAVEN1::OGLESBY | Blue Heaven | Mon Apr 06 1992 19:08 | 20 |
| EXCUSES, EXCUSES, AND MORE EXCUSES.
Face it weasels, Bob Knight choked big time.
Tell me this..
How can you have a ten point lead in the first half, and then get
outscored 33-8, without making adjustments.
Don't get me wrong, I think Knight is a great coach, but if I did
not know better I would have sworn the Knight was the student.
As far as the "T", Knight should of had better control of his players!!
So what I'm getting at weasels is for those of you who said Dean Smith
choked against #1 seeded Ohio State team after having the lead in the
first half, The same can be said about Bob Knight..
Big "O"
|
15.1160 | Oh well... | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Wilkes county N.C.! | Mon Apr 06 1992 19:14 | 9 |
| .1159� choked against #1 seeded Ohio State team after having the lead in the
Ohio St. is not Duke and they didn't make it to the Final 4 either!
.1159� first half, The same can be said about Bob Knight..
How many Championships does Snufy have....BAM! Case closed!~ :*)
B.A.
|
15.1161 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Yeah, da Tew Yutes .... | Mon Apr 06 1992 19:27 | 5 |
| Lasted year, Snuff gets big T ... UNC loses to mentee ....
1992, Bob Fright gets big T ...IU loses to mentee ...
That ought to keep a certain debate quiet for at least a few hours ...
:-)
|
15.1162 | Two for the Wolves' | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Apr 06 1992 21:51 | 15 |
|
Time to go witness the second coming to the maize and blue championship
dance. I kind of though we'd be dancing with IU(which would have been
a bit more skeery to me). With the emotional edge of knowing they
should have beaten Duke earlier in the year I think the wolves will be
National Champs 3 hours from now. It should be a great game but hope
this on doesn't fall in the hands of the ref's like a couple of others
did on Duke's road into the championship. I won't say it was
deliberate or intentional or even benefits to a reigning champion the
calls seem to have been in favor of Duke the whole tournament. I
saying this as a non-detractor of Duke although I am a big TEN(11) fan.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEE
Roy L.
|
15.1163 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Apr 07 1992 08:30 | 5 |
| Duke wins 71-51.
I'd have been happy if Michigan had won.
Scott
|
15.1164 | tough loss | DDIF::MCEVOY | | Tue Apr 07 1992 09:34 | 7 |
| Congrats to Duke, those Hills just keep coming at you.
Good season for the Wolverines, next year will be great.
That alley-oop from Rose to King in the first half was fabulous!
-dennis
|
15.1165 | | COBRA::BRYDIE | That's when I reach for my revolver | Tue Apr 07 1992 10:00 | 17 |
|
re .1156
>> The menu? Tellya what, it won't be the sour grapes that UMASS
>> fans are dining on today. Their coach is making a fool out a
>> himself, way outside of the box, a good solid call is made, he
>> takes it like a main, sorta, and now all this fine whine about
>> how "the flow of the game changed."
>> Poppycock. Kaintuck was on their way to a W as it was and all
>> the justified call did was give Raftery and Francesa a morsel to
>> mull over on a otherwise dull night.
Remember when you wrote this about UMASS ? Well just substitute Indiana
for UMASS and it fits to a "T".
|
15.1166 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Apr 07 1992 11:58 | 16 |
| Re: Doc
Need to get your facts straight(as usual :-) before spewing such
drivel. Knight did not receive a technical the IU bench did, look
it up in the boxscore.
Re: Big O
Anyone that writes such nonsense without providing any insight on how
Knight choked, especially since he had his 4 best players in foul
trouble(Graham, Cheaney, Bailey and Henderson) with 4 fouls apiece,
really should be ignored. But humor me with your in-depth analysis
on how Knight choked in a 3 point game to a better team with 4 of
his best players shackled with foul trouble and only having a bench
of 10 players. Please provide specific examples.
|
15.1167 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:08 | 25 |
| I personally wasn't as disappointed in IU's loss as I thought I'd be.
Thought Knight's gameplan was brilliant and gave IU a chance to win
even though they played terribly in the 2nd half.
I thought the foul trouble really hurt IU in the second half as Cheaney
and Graham played very soft on Grant Hill who proceeded to eat the
Hoosiers alive on the offensive boards during a key stretch.
IU held Laettner to a career low 8 points which reminds me of how a
Knight led team held Jordan to a career low game as well.
Anderson's shot at the end of the first half provided a potential 5
point turnaround and killed IU's momentum. Definately was a stupid
play.
Officiating played a role but was an overwhelming factor. The decision
to call so many charging calls hurt IU as they drive the basket more
than Duke. 33 fouls were called on Duke, while only 18 were called
on IU. Without the foul trouble we might have seen a different game.
However I do feel that Duke was the better team with as good a coach.
Coach K is one hell of a coach and will go down as one of the best in
history of college ball.
|
15.1168 | How straight is this fact ? :-) | EARRTH::BROOKS | RIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992 | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:50 | 1 |
| So Cap, why didn't we see Leary until there was a minute left ?
|
15.1169 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:10 | 18 |
| Doc your basketball IQ has to be smaller than Woody Harrelson's
vertical jump :-) but I will answer your question as I am sympathetic
with the basketball challenged. :-)
Because he's not as talented as Graham, Bailey, Meeks, Reynolds,
Cheaney, Anderson, Henderson or Nover and had played minimal minutes
during the season.
By saying that playing Todd Leary significant minutes just
because he came in and hit 3 miracle bombs is one of the most
ridiculous arguements that I have ever heard. Leary is slow, plays
terrible defense and basically made no contributions to a very
successful IU season. Hell Matt Nover hit a 3 at the end of the
game, should Knight have had Matt throw a few up since he has probably
got a career 3-pt shooting pct. of 1.000(1-1)?
|
15.1170 | Gee Cap, ya coulda been a leetle nicer! | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:22 | 1 |
|
|
15.1171 | I was just teasing, he knows that... | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:27 | 1 |
|
|
15.1172 | 8^) | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:36 | 7 |
| No Cap!
To Leary that is, the hail wif Doc!!
8^)'s
MikeL
|
15.1173 | Good one Mike.... | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:41 | 1 |
|
|
15.1174 | | SYOMV::SPRAGUE | | Tue Apr 07 1992 13:44 | 19 |
| My .02,
I though the officiating was real bad in the IU/Duke game. Alot has been said,
about Calbert's 4th "charging" foul, quite possibly the worst call in tourney
history, but I think his first or second foul was an exact replica. Baily's
fifth was weak. Like a peck on the wrist affected Cherekee Parks thunder
dunk. I thoght BK himself might have to suit up in the last minute or so.
Alright, enough whinnin. The single reason IU lost is because their guards
decided to take the night off on the defensive end. If someone had stepped
up and put one back in Hurley's face, or even sent him to the deck once or
twice maybe he would not have burried shot after open shot. As it was bobby
hoisted Crissy and the rest of the devils on his back and carried them to
victory.
Did anyone hear that load bang saturday night ? Was that Crissy's stock
droppin ? Maybe Danny Ferry could hook him up with that agent in Italy.
Stan
|
15.1175 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Easy come easy go, will you let me go? | Tue Apr 07 1992 14:14 | 7 |
| Congrats to Duke and Michigan... the foul trouble cost them in the
second half. Couldn't play as aggressive defensively and they lost
their rhythm on offense. Duke deserved to win....
Go Blue next year! As Webber said, there won't be a team with frosh
like this for a long time...
|
15.1176 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Apr 07 1992 14:39 | 34 |
| Stan, I gotta disagree on the guard defense. It was clear that
the plan was to sag on Laettner and jump out on the perimeter
shooters and hope that Hurley pacifically wouldn't uncork a career
game, which he did. He misses a couple a those treys and the
Hoosiers beat a great team with Matt Nover logging heavy minutes.
It was the best plan but didn't pan out.
Cap, I threw away my box score and admit right here and now that I've
been running some chronic hangovers the last four daze (college buds
in town) but I thought IU got called for 42 fouls and Duke 18. Anybody
got the box?
Anytime you send the opposition into 1-and-1 with 14:30 and two shot
fouls with 12 minutes it's hard. I cain see a clearly overmatched team
that grabbing and hanging on for dear life ending up in such foul
straits, but Indiana more than held their own underneath, outrebounding
the taller quicker Blue Devils.
Todd Leary is the last guard off the bench because he's awful on
defense and has trouble maintaining possession of the pill against
tough defenders.
It was good to see the Big10 proved the best hoops league, not so nice
to see Fisher playing into K's hands with his stupid offensive plan,
trying to run a Duke/IU-like pattern offense where the spacing was
awful, the passing tentative, picks non-existent, and shot selection
wretched.
Fisher shoulda gone run n' gun from the outset. If he just HAD to play
a classic offense then he shoulda benched Rose for Talley after the
first TO, by which time it was clear that Jalen is incapable of running
a disciplined offense (and not a running offense).
MrT
|
15.1177 | :^) | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Apr 07 1992 15:50 | 3 |
| Who'd play a guy with a name like Leary??
Joe
|
15.1178 | Ahem | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 16:40 | 20 |
| Wail, ifn. he cain't play D, is slow, gives up the pill whence
under pressure, but cain shoot treys, he definitely is related
to these poor East Coast shanty Irish. And he's intelligent, for
sure, attendin' the best school in thease here US of A fer furthering
his basketball knowledge and larning under THE Yoda(fer BBall).
Now if he was football-minded, I'd suspect, with his inherent
brilliance, he'd a opted fer the Mecca a coupla hundred miles
northward.
Fine state Indiana, Basketball prowess down south, football prowess
up north. Just shows ya these Leary's know what's bested fer them,
yessir.
8^),
MikeL
|
15.1179 | I've got your vertical leap ! :-) | EARRTH::BROOKS | RIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992 | Tue Apr 07 1992 16:51 | 12 |
| Cap, if Leary is slow, caint play D, but can hit the three - what is
the problem ?
According to your cohort MrT, he's the perfect IU player. In fack, he
sounds suspicously like Steve Alford ... :-)
Face it Cap, The General didn't whip out the right weapon at the right
time, and beetch-slapped by his mentee.
Pantheon my a** ..... :-)
Doc
|
15.1180 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:11 | 14 |
| Hey Mike, Jeff George is from central Indiana, Indy! Now
*that's* prowess!
Speaking of intelligent basketball players, how in the hell
cain juniors and seniors have undeclared majors?
The Hoosiers couldn't win the Final4, but they woulda won a
quiz show matchup with the other three, with a starting lineup
featuring a molecular biology major, three biz school kids (Calbert,
Reynolds, Nover), and only one Criminal Justice major and one
sociology major (a favorite with Duke and Bearcat players) on
the squad.
MrT
|
15.1181 | | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:22 | 14 |
| T,
I was wonderin the same thing. How CAIN a jr. or sr have an undeclared
major?? Makes no sense to me. Mebbe they're "on loan". Sheesh
Speakin of Indy, what's the name of the big Catholic HS there? Coupla
whacky ND boys in me dorm ( fine lads by the names of McDonald and
Loughery) came from an Indy Catholic HS. Mebbe you went to same?
And I can't remember for the hail of me what the name of the famous
Indy bar that dishes in all ND games (football und BBall)! Got a
great rep.
MikeL
|
15.1182 | Cathedral H.S., or Brebeuf H.S. (Jesuit prep) | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:26 | 1 |
|
|
15.1183 | Ah, was Cathedral! | CTHQ2::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:27 | 1 |
|
|
15.1184 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Apr 07 1992 17:49 | 32 |
| Interesting star gazing over the weekend, especially last
night, when we ended up crashing CBS' private party at
Boccio's (a upscale yuppoid sports bar downtown) without
even realizing it! MrT's objective observations:
Leslie Visser has skinny legs... Mike Francesa, whom we
stood near at the bar for quite a while, is a genuine nice
guy, the kind a New York salt a the earth good guy that never
gets talked about, this dude is no phony... Pat O'Brien is
without a doubt the biggest egomaniac I've ever encountered
personally. There were legendary stories already about him
after the Series, but when he came walking in (with a big
bodyguard obsequiously brushing the stairs free of dust so
Pat's Bally's would touch no dirt) smoking a stogie, he was
emanating a "aura zone" so wide that you woulda thunk that
it was John Lennon or Michael Jordan or President Bush coming
in. A truly amazing display... Bill Walton is tall. Real
tall... Billy Packer doesn't do bars, he came to the entrance
and had a flunky go get Francesa to go get something... Did
you know that a CBS Sports big-wig (he seemed like he was up
in the org by all the beautiful blondes fawning to such a ugly
old main) went to Duke, and worked totally bedecked in Duke
sports wear?...
I'll never forget O'Brien's entrance. Nobody will. A half-hour
after he swept through even the bartenders were shaking their haids
saying, "cain you believe it? Unbelievable!"
Pat should move to west LA where they don't notice craven egomania
on such a grand scale.
MrT
|
15.1185 | Oh well maybe 3 more shots | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Tue Apr 07 1992 18:45 | 9 |
| I thought Fisher knew to dance with the one that brought ya.
Changin O strategies with frosh aint the same as veteran squads. I hope
it was a lesson well learned.
Somehow wolverines fans should be adjusted to the big game loses but in
this game I guess being a 6point underdog should have keyed lower
expectations.
Roy L.
|
15.1186 | ABC and NBC's 6 whole games don't cut it | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Tue Apr 07 1992 18:46 | 4 |
| Hey T, you shoulda told one of those CBS big-wigs that they need to
start doing college football again.
Joe
|
15.1187 | :*) | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Wilkes county N.C.! | Tue Apr 07 1992 19:29 | 10 |
| .1184� Leslie Visser has skinny legs... Mike Francesa, whom we
.1184� stood near at the bar for quite a while, is a genuine nice
Mike is a jerk! With a capital J!!!! He has never played any ball
in his life! He dosen't know when to shut-up!
But then again, If T likes him, then he's really a As*hole! :*)
Big,BIG difference!
B.A.
|
15.1188 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Tue Apr 07 1992 23:06 | 5 |
| Speaking a anal orifi, Pat O'Brien goes down in my book as the
biggest flamer I've ever encountered in person, and I've been
around the pits at a lot a F1 races!
MrT
|
15.1189 | If you only knew... | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | Wilkes county N.C.! | Tue Apr 07 1992 23:38 | 6 |
| .1188� around the pits at a lot a F1 races!
You should try the *other* pits....and get some down home greetings
from some great drivers!
B.A.
|
15.1190 | tell me more about Ms. Visser.....;^) | 7389::FARLEY | Son,you can make hundreds o'dollars... | Wed Apr 08 1992 00:55 | 1 |
|
|
15.1191 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Wed Apr 08 1992 09:30 | 17 |
| � The Hoosiers couldn't win the Final4, but they woulda won a
� quiz show matchup with the other three, with a starting lineup
� featuring a molecular biology major, three biz school kids (Calbert,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
� Reynolds, Nover), and only one Criminal Justice major and one
� sociology major (a favorite with Duke and Bearcat players) on
� the squad.
� MrT
MorT, our good buddy Jim Wardle told me something you said in an
interview about business majors. I cain't remember exactly what it was.
Cain you help me out? Did it have something to do about the number of
pages they read as compared to say, a Russian major?
/Don
|
15.1192 | Duke not receiving the credit they deserve... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Apr 08 1992 10:37 | 30 |
|
Francessa's unpopular because he tells it like he knows and feels it,
and that upsets people. The guy's one of the most knowledgeable college
football/basketball analysts around. Others might be better with one
or the other, but I don't who is more well-rounded at both (and let's
not hear any more of this sacrilege about bringing back the totally
vacuous Brett Musburger to pump the hype back up in these "events").
I have no reason to dislike Mike Francessa even if he is from New
York... ;-)
> Cap, I threw away my box score and admit right here and now that I've
> been running some chronic hangovers the last four daze (college buds
> in town) but I thought IU got called for 42 fouls and Duke 18. Anybody
> got the box?
Is anyone going to up front and honest with us about this Duke
favoritism business and tell us how many of the free throws came after
Indiana (or any of their other opponents in the tourney, Kentucky
excepted) sent player after player to the charity stripe after the Duke
lead became unmanageable? Much has been made of the fact that Duke has
dominated their opponents from the line in the past few years, but
guess what? When you're constantly winning you're constantly placed in
the timeout-foul-timeout-foul bore that is college basketball's final
minutes. Once again in the Indiana game, I thought the game was fairly
poorly officiated (all penetrations called for charging, for both
teams), but was not the reason Duke won. They won because they played
great defense in the second half...
glenn
|
15.1193 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 10:44 | 9 |
| Glenn, I have to agree with about Francesa. I don't always agree with
what he says, but he at least has an opinion and expresses it. I also
think he's quite a knowledgeable analyst.
It's funny - people bemoan the banality of most analysts and then when
there is one who is vocal and opinionated, he's disliked for being that
way.
John
|
15.1194 | Good point, Ninj | SCNDRL::HUNT | He-Man Tar Heel Haters Club | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:23 | 7 |
| � It's funny - people bemoan the banality of most analysts and then when
� there is one who is vocal and opinionated, he's disliked for being that
� way.
See "Cosell, Howard".
Bob Hunt
|
15.1195 | Perspective | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Apr 08 1992 11:56 | 6 |
| And remember - Francesa's opinions are no more or less valid than
yours, he just has a bigger forum in which to express them. (it's just
like Hall of Fame voting, or the Oscars or the MVP - your opinions are
no more or less valid than the ones that count towards these awards).
John
|
15.1196 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Wed Apr 08 1992 12:48 | 2 |
| Listen to Francesa on WFAN, he's the voice of reason on THAT shaw.
Denny
|
15.1197 | | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:43 | 20 |
|
Glenn,
Duke hit 8 of 10 free throws at the end of the game when IU was
fouling intentionally(Clark was 5-6, Parks was 1-2 and Hurley was
2-2) so that would have left the foul difference at 28 - 18 Duke.
In fact before the IU bench got the T, the foul situation in the
2nd half was 9-1 or 9-2 in favor of Duke with IU's 4 best players in
foul trouble with 4 fouls apiece.
Not saying that IU would have won this game as they shot terribly in
the second half but it would have been nice to see if IU could have
mounted an earlier comeback with their best lineup.
Duke was the better team. I was happy with IU's performance in the
tourney this year. No sour grapes here as they certainly had enough
opportunities to win that game. If they had shot in the 2nd half as
they did in the first, it would have been a 10 pt IU win.
Cap.
|
15.1198 | Pat Knight kicked off IU team after arrest | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu Apr 09 1992 16:05 | 23 |
| Subject: Knight boots son from IU team after arrest for public intoxication
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 11:26:14 PDT
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (UPI) -- Indiana basketball Coach Bob Knight didn't
hestitate after his son, Pat, was arrested for public intoxication and
disorderly conduct.
The younger Knight was kicked off the Hoosiers' basketball team, a
report said Thursday.
Police confirmed that Pat Knight, 21, was arrested early Wednesday in
a car near a Bloomington tavern.
Authorities said Knight was a passenger in a car whose driver was
stopped after leaving the tavern. Police said Knight was arrested after
becoming unruly.
The Bloomington Herald-Times said Coach Knight kicked his son off the
team after learning of the arrest.
Knight's office said the coach was out of town Thursday and
unavailable for comment.
The university issued no statement but a source said no other
disciplinary action was planned against the younger Knight, who was
released from custody on his own recognizance later Wednesday.
Knight, a sophomore, sat out the 1991-92 season as a redshirt. He
earlier played at Bloomington North High School and New Hampton Prep
School. He scored 39 points at Indiana as a freshman.
|
15.1199 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Thu Apr 09 1992 16:07 | 3 |
| you mean the IU seniors didn't get to decide the punishment like a
certain ACC coach does it?
Denny
|
15.1200 | I could use some peace and quiet | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Thu Apr 09 1992 23:30 | 28 |
|
Nothing double-secret about this punishment, fortunately or no. So
far, no one's 100% sure on whether Pat Knight is PERMANENTLY off the team.
The talk shows and papers seem to think he is, but history might suggest he's
not. Back in '78 when the "Great Marijuana Incident" occurred, the only
players permanently dropped were the three who lied about their participation.
The other two were suspended from the team for some length of time which I
no longer remember.
So, in the last three weeks, we have:
* The "Great Banquet Scandal";
* The (ongoing) "Great Whip Controversy"; and,
* The "Coach Kicks Son Off Team" headlines
Knight's getting a lot more early support on this one on the call-in
show I listen to than he did on the others, btw.
Gosh, I wonder how recruiting will be this fall :^(
tom
|
15.1201 | settled? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Mental Model | Fri Apr 10 1992 10:08 | 5 |
| > Gosh, I wonder how recruiting will be this fall :^(
I thought the consensus was that Bobby couldn't recruit, anyhow?
TTom
|
15.1202 | What's next? Pat transfers to NC? | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Apr 10 1992 10:31 | 9 |
|
I don't think can't recruit is accurate, although some might disagree.
Certainly it's only a consensus if your opinion sample is small :^)
But the "lowlight" tape opposing coaches use when they go up against
Knight in a recruiting battle HAS to be on it's second cassette by now.
tom
|
15.1203 | another crushing rib-shot | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Apr 10 1992 11:53 | 14 |
| Knight cain recruit fine, compared to, say, Minnesota or USC or
Villanova or St. John's or or Illinois or Pitt or Missouri or
a lot a other big-time programs. But, basically limiting himself
to a 3-state recruiting ground, he's never moved the program up
to the top level, the Star Hells, SyrExcuses, Dukes, et al.
One thing fer sure: Bob's consistent. I was looking forward to
having Pat playing, he's kinda slow and a 'tweener size wise, but
he cain flat shoot and plays tough on the boards/picks/D. It's
a setback for next year for sure. And most quality players are
already signed, so it'll be interesting to see whom he comes up
with for a refill.
Poor MrT
|
15.1204 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Apr 10 1992 11:57 | 11 |
|
T
Actually I'm glad Pat Knight won't be there (assuming he won't). I
didn't like the idea of him being on the team anyway. Seems to me that coach's
kids, ESPECIALLY non-star coach's kids, often have a negative impact on team
chemistry.
There *should* be enough shooters to go around next year.
tom
|
15.1205 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:22 | 5 |
| T and Tom. Come now, haven't we seen instances in the past where Bob
the Great has made hasty decisions! No need to worry T, Pat Knight
will be on the end of the bench next season.
WILDCAT
|
15.1206 | The punishment is a bit harsh. | SASE::SZABO | | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:28 | 8 |
| Allie Maguire (McGuire?) certainly was no negative impact on his dad's
Marquette Warriors!
I also think that Pat will be back on the team next year, maybe not at
the beginning of the season, but sometime shortly after, at least...
Hawk
|
15.1207 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:33 | 11 |
|
True about McGuire. On the other hand, walk-on Brian Donoher was a
big-time negative impact on Don Donoher's last University of Dayton team(s).
I'd agree that being permanently banned would be harsh. Wouldn't be
the first time Knight's overreacted, though, and he may hold his son to a
pretty high standard.
tom
|
15.1208 | | FSOA::JRODOPOULOS | Intl. Business Support | Fri Apr 10 1992 12:41 | 6 |
| > Pat Knight, 21........a sophomore.....
I guess Coach Knight did not pass his son any smart genes. :)
John "D Cowboys" R.
Whose wearing his Duke stuff today
|
15.1209 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Yowza! | Fri Apr 10 1992 13:20 | 5 |
| Having read some of the dribble in here from the Big Zero and Doctor
Many Zeroes, I feel that my assessment that neither has a clue is
correct.
JD
|
15.1210 | maybe he needed some food in his belly... | ROYALT::ASHE | A mosquito... Yacopino... | Fri Apr 10 1992 13:32 | 2 |
| So when's the banquet?
|
15.1211 | | SYOMV::SPRAGUE | | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:04 | 11 |
| Pat Knight and the Banquet will be back in '93.
As far as the recruiting goes, BK will never get the kids who couldn't play
in a disciplined system, and who wants 'em. Let the Syracuse's and Depaul's
and the UNLV's and the Arkansas' and the LSU's have those selfish gunners. For
the few, the proud, that are hoosier material, neither the banquet nor the Pat
Knight debacle will change their mind.
my $.02
Stan.
|
15.1212 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Support DCU Petition Candidates | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:14 | 4 |
| Gee, no mention from MorT of Wisconson's hockey team going after the
ref after the final game! Guess they chased him all the way down the
tunnel. Thought that only happened in aCC land!
Denny
|
15.1213 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuh | Mon Apr 13 1992 13:37 | 3 |
| Typical BigTen behavior Denny. Riot and fight when you lose.
/Don
|
15.1214 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:08 | 15 |
| >I guess Coach Knight did not pass his son any smart genes. :^)
>
>John "D Cowboys" R.
>Whose wearing his Duke stuff today
Pat lost a year by going to a prep school, I think on the east
coast. Choate or one a those big-time schools. Pat's older
brother attended Stanford as a non-athlete.
If we wanna talk scholar-athlete low-lights, how 'bout all those
Sociology and Afro-American Studies majors on Duke; or how 'bout
those undeclared juniors and seniors on Michigan; or maybe the
All-Criminal Justice Bearcats, hmm?
MrT
|
15.1215 | The hockey gods never forget | CTHQ3::LEARY | BobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTS | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:22 | 8 |
| Wisconsin went after the ref after the champeenship game??
HMMM. It took a long time but the hockey gods remember 1973 and
the Badgers got their comeuppance finally! Lordy I wishes Bob Johnson
was around AND at Wisconsin to experience "what goes around comes
around." ( in a hockey sense mind you)
MikeL
|
15.1216 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Your mother's an astronaunt ... | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:36 | 1 |
| Tough love from BobKnight ... my thighs are a'shudderin' ....
|
15.1217 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Apr 13 1992 15:48 | 1 |
| And we all know where young Mr.Knight picked up his vocabulary ;^)
|
15.1218 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 13 1992 16:16 | 3 |
| Pat Knight went to New Hampton Prep in Concord, NH.
Ninj
|
15.1219 | | FSOA::JRODOPOULOS | Intl. Business Support | Mon Apr 13 1992 17:04 | 8 |
| Hey T, what is this adoration with Coach Nightee (tm) ? Does your wife
know about this problem ?
BTW, I have to admit that T is not what I expected when I first met
him. He is a young, caucasian, Irish, backslapping kinda guy. He is
also a slender kind of fellow. Nice guy.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
15.1220 | Midwest Micky D' AA for the last 15 years | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon Apr 13 1992 19:01 | 72 |
| USA Today list the McDonalds All America players by State. It has been
in existence for 15 years.
Key: Big Ten
(IL)-Illinois, (IU)-Indiana, (IO)-Iowa, (M)-Michigan. (MS)-Michigan St.
(MN)-Minnesota, (O)- Ohio St, (P)-Purdue (WI)-Wisonsin (N)-Northwestern
Other Midwest Schools
(ND)- Notre Dame, (D)-Depaul, (MQ)-Marquette
I notated those players who I was aware of that played in the Big 10 and
other midwestern schools. There are definitely names I am not familiar with.
Some of these guys may have been mired on the end of schools bench or left
the midwest for some unnamed schools(acc, big east, sec). It is also possible
that some of these players went to smaller schools. It is amazing that so
many players did play in the midwest where they attended high school.
Feel free to update the listing.
Illinois
Mark Aquirre(D), Eric Anderson(IU), Nick Anderson(IL), Jamie Brandon,
Chris Collins, Russell Cross(P), Daryl Cunningham, Bruce Douglas(IL),
Walter Downing, LaPhonso Ellis(ND), Teddy Grubbs, Lowell Hamiltion(IL),
Phil Henderson, Ed Horton(IO), Juwan Howard(M), Richard Keene,
Tom Kleinschmidt, Marcus Liberty(IL), Roger McClendon, Raymond McCoy(D),
Howard Nathan, Michael Payne(IO), Glen Rivers(MQ), Daryl Thomas,
Deon Thomas(IL), Isiah Thomas(IU), Raymond Thompson, Chuck Verderber,
and Efrem Winters(IL).
**Illini got a fair share of these players. Iowa and Duke get a couple.
Outside of NY and CAL this looks to be the largest concentration.
Indiana
Damon Bailey(IU), Tom Baker, Ken Barlow(ND), James Blackmon, Delray Brooks(IU),
Jay Edwards(IU), John Flowers(IU), Greg Graham(IU), Pat Graham(IU),
Roger Harden, Jerome Harden, Alan Henderson(IU), Kip Jones(P), Shawn Kemp,
Troy Lewis(P), Charles Macon, James Master, Eric Montross, Glen Robinson(P),
Ray Tolbert(IU), and Landon Turner(IU).
**Bob Knight may not get national recruits but he does a heck of a job in the
midwest in particular Indiana and Illinois. Purdue and ND get a few.
Iowa
Al Lorenzen(IO)
Michigan
Tim Andree, Derrick Coleman, Earvin Johnson(MS), Antoine Joubert(M), Mark Macon,
Roy Marble(IO), Tim McCormick(M), Terry Mills(M), Kenyon Murray,
Anthony Pendelton, Jalen Rose(M), Kevin Smith(MS), Barry Spencer,
Matt Steigenga(MS), Eric Turner(M), Sam Vincent(MS), and Chris Webber(M).
**Michigan and Michigan State got a few but quite a few got away.
Minnesota
Jim Peterson(MN)
Ohio
Dwight Anderson, Rick Calloway(IU), Gary Grant(M), Jimmy Jackson(O),
Clark Kellogg(O), Jerome Lane, Treg Lee(O), Martin Nessley, John Paxson(ND),
and Greg Simpson.
Wisconsin
Joe Wolfe
****************************************************************************
For futures
Pennsylvania
Gene Banks, Barry Bekkedam, Sam Bowie, Dallas Comegys(D), Reggie Jackson,
Jeff Lebo, Donyell Marshall, Bill McCaffrey, Alonzo McFarlan, Billy Owens,
Horace Owens, Dave Popson, Jerome Richardson, Mark Stevenson(ND), and
Clarence Tillman.
|
15.1221 | Finally, proof! No plate-stacking butt!! | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Mon Apr 13 1992 20:24 | 1 |
|
|
15.1222 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Mon Apr 13 1992 20:42 | 8 |
| Phil Henderson - Duke, Teddy Grubbs - DePaul, Daryl Thomas - Indiana,
Eric Montross - UNC, Derrick Coleman - Syracuse, Mark Macon - Temple,
Gene Banks - Duke, Sam Bowie - Kentucky, Jeff Lebo - UNC, Donyell
Marshall - Connecticut, Bill McCaffery - Duke, Billy Owens - Syracuse,
Horace Owens - Rhode Island, Dave Popson - UNC and Jerome "Pooh"
Richardson - UCLA.
John
|
15.1223 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Thought I lobster, but now I flounder... | Tue Apr 14 1992 11:06 | 1 |
| Shawn kemp - Kentucky
|
15.1224 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri May 08 1992 09:45 | 10 |
|
Pat Graham, Indiana junior who sat out last season after breaking
his foot in a pre-season practice, has broken the foot again. At this time
they claim to be optimistic that he can be fully recovered by next season.
Anyone know how likely, or unlikely, it is that he can come back from
this and be effective? It's always seemed to me that recovering fully from a
second break is pretty rare.
tom
|
15.1225 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Fri May 08 1992 18:40 | 4 |
| Tom, sounds like he has the same disease Sam Bowie had at UK. That's
too bad. Sounds as though this could be one of those chronic injuries.
WILDCAT
|
15.1226 | Multiple breaks tend to lead to chronic problems | CELTIK::R_QUINN | | Mon May 11 1992 20:14 | 4 |
|
A similar deal took Andrew Toney of the '76ers out of the game.
Roy L.
|
15.1227 | UPI: Purdue wrestling coach quit because of low pay | FORTSC::MOK | | Thu May 28 1992 17:53 | 38 |
| This has nothing to do with basketball really, but a Big Ten school's
athletic program nonetheless.
Subject: Purdue mat coach quits because of low pay
Date: Thu, 28 May 92 6:40:00 PDT
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. (UPI) -- Purdue head wrestling coach Mitch Hull
quit with an open letter complaining that his pay was the lowest in the
Big Ten.
Hull, 35, said his pay of $25,500 was simply too low to support a
wife and three children. After being Boilermakers head coach for the
past four seasons, he took an administrative position with USA Wrestling
in Colorado Springs, Colo., at nearly double his Purdue salary, he said.
The $25,500 is for a 10-month contract. Purdue pro-rates pay for a
year and lists Hull at $30,970 per year.
Hull said the day he was promoted from assistant coach his mood went
swiftly from joy to gloom when he learned his 10 percent raise would
leave him struggling financially.
``I became phyusically ill by the thought of having to tell my wife
that the sacrifice I put my family through toi become head wrestling
coach at Purdue was going to bring us $22,000 a year,'' he said.
``Imagine, being the head coach at a Big Ten university and qualifying
for food stamps.''
``I'm sorry and disappointed that Mitch resigned and did it that way,
'' said retiring Athletic Director George King Wednesday, ``but I think
I understand where he's coming from.
``Hopefully some good can come from this,'' King said. ``It is hard
to dispute facts, and facts are that we have a number of our people who
really are underpaid,'' he said. He said one of the reasons he is
retiring June 30 is ``to try to give the departmment a chance to get
into different types of funding.''
He said the only somewhat well-paid person in the department is
basketball coach Gene Keady, while Jim Colletto is ninth or 10th among
the conference football coaches in pay and King probably ranks around
ninth or 10th among the athletic directors.
Keady is paid $137,700 and Colletto $110,000, while King's salary is
$107,000, Purdue sources said.
|
15.1228 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | The Opposite Of Macho Is Bimbo | Thu Jun 04 1992 11:20 | 6 |
| Any word on how Glenn Robinson did academically as a frosh? This
guy is maybge better than Chris Webber and is the reason Gene
Keady, who loves to interview, wouldn't even consider several job
opportunities this spring.
MrT
|
15.1229 | | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | In search of mythical kings | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:11 | 7 |
|
No details, but my understanding is that he'll be eligible next year.
Robinson, who's *probably* as good as Chris Webber, and Kenny Williams
will give Purdue a monster frontcourt for other Big 10(1) schools to deal with.
tom
|
15.1230 | Recruiting Info | STRATA::CAPPEL | | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:50 | 43 |
| Looks like IU might have some NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS in 93-94.
Article: 15281
From: [email protected] (Mike Von Foerster)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Bob Gibbons says
Date: 7 Jun 92 12:14:41 GMT
Sender: foerster@zman (Mike Von Foerster)
Organization: Data General Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC
I just got my Bob Gibbons news letter for May and the keywords for
1993 recruiting are Indiana and Duke.
Duke has received committments from Jeff Capel 6'4" PG from Hope Mills, NC
and Greg Newton 6'10" PF from Niagara Falls, Ontario Canada.
Indiana has received committments from Robbie Eggars 6'10" C/PF, Cuyahoga
Falls, OH and from Richard Mandeville, 7'0" C from LaCanada, CA. Word is
Joe Hillman helped a lot with this one. Bob Gibbons projects an Indiana
front line of Eggars, Mandeville and Henderson. Oooohhhh My, Hoosier fans
will be adjusting their TV's to be able to get these big guys on the
screen.
Gentry Sparks, 6'8" PF is going to FSU.
Derek Anderson 6'4" 2G is officially signed with OSU.
Sydney Coles 6'4" PG signed with Memphis State (younger brother of Bimbo Coles)
Brandon Titus 6'4" 2G signed with LSU. LSU recruited no one over 6'6". All 5
recruits are perimeter players
Craig Tyson, 6'4" 2G from Southern Idaho JC signed with Arkansas. This guy can
let them fly from downtown.
There's a lot of good stuff in his news letter
--
Michael von Foerster Internet: [email protected]
DG/UX Core Development UUCP: {world}!mcnc!rti!dg-rtp!foerster
Data General Corporation
62 T.W. Alexander Drive
RTP, NC. 27709 Phone: 919-248-6327
|
15.1231 | Big10: Nation's tip-top hoops circuit next year | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Navigating from the poop deck | Tue Jun 09 1992 13:35 | 16 |
| I've gotten by for 8 years with my 13 inch Sony, but with this
big wide Class a '93 coming in I have a year and a half to save
up for a 32 inch job.
But even for next year we got the Ohio PoY coming in with the
signing of 6-4 Maurice Sims and the 6-4 Steve Hart, who apparently
cain jump higher than Keith Smart!
It's looks like Bob has weathered the malicious fiction put out
by that fat NorthEastCorridorCircleJerk sudden millionaire creep
and the program is BACK ON TRACK.
Maybe these good things are happening cuz a the coaching lesson
Bob dog-walked his acolyte through in the Dome last March...
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.1232 | better win with them | HBAHBA::HAAS | WTOE Radio | Tue Jun 09 1992 13:41 | 7 |
| Let's see: "best coach", "best program", "best recruiting".
Seems a whole lot like that program in Chapel Hill. Now all we need is
Bobby to not win it with this group and then we can apply the much
coveted El Deano Choko award.
TTom
|
15.1233 | | FRETZ::HEISER | I *AM* Mike | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:12 | 5 |
| > I've gotten by for 8 years with my 13 inch Sony, but with this
> big wide Class a '93 coming in I have a year and a half to save
> up for a 32 inch job.
No wonder they call you Po' Mr.T! You need a few more inches!
|
15.1234 | and furthermore....... | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:13 | 9 |
|
I still don't agree with the freshman eligibility rule.
I wanna see it abolished!!!!!!!
imo, of course,
Kev
|
15.1235 | 13 inches is plenty big buddy | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | GunsDon'tKillPeopleBulletsDo | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:45 | 1 |
|
|
15.1236 | I wouldn't cut any off for anyone | FRETZ::HEISER | electric warrior/acoustic saint | Tue Jun 09 1992 15:26 | 1 |
|
|
15.1238 | 4:09 PM | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Quayle: Murphy caused the LA riot!! | Tue Jun 09 1992 16:10 | 0 |
15.1239 | btw - what was the purchase price? | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Tue Jun 09 1992 16:28 | 16 |
|
Hail I don't care what base or scale MrT uses to measure length. All
I want is him to cert and cert and cert to the tune of ~180% of goal.
Naturally, this is to set an example of overachieving ;^)
Sell "T", sell.....
bring in the money
pleeze?
I remain,
wanting the stock to go up!
Kev
|
15.1240 | lucky for Mr.T ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | electric warrior/acoustic saint | Tue Jun 09 1992 17:39 | 1 |
| Po' Mrs.T has no sense of distance
|
15.1241 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | GunsDon'tKillPeopleBulletsDo | Mon Jun 15 1992 16:41 | 4 |
| I aim a visionary and visonaries always have a superb sense
a distance, thank you.
MrT
|
15.1242 | Bob > Dean | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jun 17 1992 09:30 | 1 |
| Bob > Dean
|
15.1243 | | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jun 17 1992 10:06 | 4 |
|
LOUIEEE > Bob > Dean < Bumheim
nuff said!
|
15.1244 | Pop quiz on the Basketball Hall a Fame | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:06 | 11 |
| The admission of Louie Carnagesickum into the hoops HoF:
a - Cheapened the HoF
b - Made a laughinstock of the HoF's admissions standards
c - Was a ringing endorsement of mediocrity
d - Amounted to a victory of maudlin personality over performance
e - All a the above
|
15.1245 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:17 | 2 |
| I think it was the sweaters that did it!
Denny
|
15.1246 | jest jealous cause Bob has fewer fans than LOUIEEE! | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:35 | 14 |
|
MrT(terminal),
Of course that last reply was your opinion and as we all know,
opions(tm) are like a**holes.
IMO, I'm gonna consider your opion(tm) and a**hole to be one and the
same!
;^)
I remain,
greatful you clarified and removed all doubt about CP II being a hoax!
Kev
|
15.1247 | stains? | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:41 | 7 |
| >I think it was the sweaters that did it!
Denny, more likely it was the fack that Carnagesickum never saw
a reporter's shoe that he wouldn't lick. Sorta makes you wonder
where all those big ugly splotchy spots on his sweaters came from...
MrT
|
15.1248 | twisted man, really but I unnerstand | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:56 | 22 |
|
I'd like to correct one small error in your (erroneous) opinion
and obvious biass Mr. Platestacker,
You (obviously from contact with that thug Rev. Knight) are
misinterpreting a well bred gentlemanly behavior of LOUIEE with
a weakness, since Rev. Knight has no class and believes that anything
other than uncivilized behavior must be considered "shoe licking wimp
behavior"!!!!!
I don't know about your family but *I'm* raising my kid to be well bred
and to exhibit superior human qualities by avoiding violence!
Therefore to correct someting:
LOUIEEEE > Rev. Knight because a superior man abhors violence while
a_inferior man thrives on it!
;^)
Kev
|
15.1249 | bid difference, that | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Wed Jun 17 1992 16:38 | 6 |
| I seem to remember that Mr. Carnagesicum, whom you extoll as a
avoider a violence, has had problems with basketball riots involving
his team. On a more positive note, Bob has never had a single player
involved in a single fight. Ever.
MrT
|
15.1250 | hth | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Wed Jun 17 1992 16:56 | 12 |
|
Brain cells are shorted out again MrT(temporary),
They were simply defending themselves (i.e. blocking & stopping
punches) by those thugs in Gougetown.
No tanks necessary, jest send money!
;^)
Kev
|
15.1251 | Carnagesickum does NOT belong in the HoF | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jun 18 1992 10:55 | 6 |
| However you spin control it, Bob's criticised for violence but in
25 years never had a player in a fight; Carnagesickum is praised as
a beacon of peace and yet has more violent blotches on his record
than on those awful sweaters he covers is pot gut with.
MrT
|
15.1252 | Can you say arrest warrant? | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Jun 18 1992 12:22 | 11 |
|
LOUIEEE never threw a chair, never punched out a policeman
or pulled his team off the floor in a fit of childlike rage!
your serve......
I remain,
havin fun with this!
Kev
|
15.1253 | Bob Knight: Integrity Personified... | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Thu Jun 18 1992 14:41 | 12 |
| Bob never pulled his team off of any floor. He was ordered to
remove his team by the haid official three minutes after the
Commies had already gone to the locker room. USA Basketball later
issued a letter a apology to Bob for the mix-up that lead to them
calling the game a forfeit and forcing him to pull his team from
the floor.
And yes, Carnagesickum never punched anybody. He relied on his
street punk "scholar" athletes to do the assault and battery
piece.
MrT
|
15.1254 | ya forgot to mention the chair T-emporary ! | 7389::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabe | Thu Jun 18 1992 15:44 | 1 |
|
|
15.1255 | big frikkin' deal | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | MrT: SPORTS' Master Baiter | Thu Jun 18 1992 18:41 | 1 |
|
|
15.1256 | you sure look good in that "G" string Bob | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Face.... The Final Frontier | Fri Jun 19 1992 08:12 | 13 |
| Bob, you make my heart throb.
Bobby, thank you for the Excellence, the Integrity, the sublime
motion offense, all those Big10 Titles, the humiliation of stupid
big-mouthed "coaches"... but Bob, thank you most a all for all those
National Championships.
I cain't protect you in here anymore Bob. This sad task must now
be left to Cap and Tom Simpson. But wherever I go, Bobby, I will
stand foursquare to preach the gospel and protect your legacy a
Greatness.
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.1257 | Not like trying to protect Dean, or KY | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | Barth,Coover,Robbins,MrT | Fri Jun 19 1992 09:30 | 5 |
|
Bob'll be fine, T. As you've said on more than one occasion, standing
up for integrity and greatness is an honor, not a chore.
tom
|
15.1258 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death before Dishonor | Fri Jun 19 1992 09:36 | 9 |
| Good point Tom.
Many are called, few are chosen. Bob was not only chosen, but he has
excelled.
MrT should know that his legacy in here will not be forgotten.....
'Saw
|
15.1259 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Fri Jun 19 1992 11:27 | 7 |
| Yeah right! I'd love my kids too look up to Bob Knight as a role
model. How to treat others with respect, etc. How to sacrifice your
own ego for others, etc.
NOT!!!
WILDCAT
|
15.1260 | Some things never change | WWSSB::COOK_T | They don't call them serial wounders, do they?! | Fri Jun 19 1992 11:54 | 9 |
| Re: last few
I love this... MorT going down in a blaze of POPB!!
Losing control over the one thing he has always rallied against.
Conan
|
15.1261 | | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Face.... The Final Frontier | Fri Jun 19 1992 13:41 | 10 |
| A question I always wanted to axe, but didn't: Is BobKnight God?
Or maybe just a angel?
Bobby if I ever meet you again I aim gonna suck your toes slamming
my face into your feet woodpecker-style under my lips are all puffy
and bruised!
What a wonderful person joe are Bobby...
Big10 Bigot Tom
|
15.1262 | Goodbye to ol' #15 | ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY | Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight | Fri Jun 19 1992 13:41 | 1 |
|
|
15.1263 | -2,you just gave Bob diarrhea of the cloven hoof | CTHQ1::LEARY | Six, two, and even. | Fri Jun 19 1992 13:57 | 1 |
|
|
15.1264 | | WWSSB::COOK_T | They don't call them serial wounders, do they?! | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:01 | 10 |
| re: .1261
I'm dying... HAHAHAHAHA(tm)!
All I can picture is ugly girl spoof on "In Living Color"
"I'll rock your world"...
Conan
|
15.1265 | Knight on radio | JURAN::MCKAY | | Mon Jun 22 1992 13:53 | 6 |
| I read in Sunday's paper how one of the local am stations is having
a one hour (fishing?) panel made up of Ted Williams, someone else
and The General. I think it's happening on Tuesday of this week.
If anyone is interested send me mail and I'll look up the specifics.
Jimbo
|
15.1266 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:01 | 3 |
| I think it's Dale Arnold on WEEI at noon tomorrow. The 'other guy'
is Curt Gowdy.
Denny
|
15.1267 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death before Dishonor | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:04 | 4 |
| I'd call that a Blue Ribbon Panel then.
'Saw
|
15.1268 | Wait till next year...or the year after | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | Barth,Coover,Robbins,MrT | Wed Nov 11 1992 21:01 | 18 |
|
The Hoosiers signed 5 recruits today:
Richard Mandeville, 7-0, La Canada, CA
Robbie Eggers, 6-10, Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Sherron Wilkerson, 6-3, Jeffersonville, IN
Rob Foster, 6-3, Los Angeles, CA
Steve Hart, 6-3, Terre Haute, IN
Hart initially signed with the Hoosiers last year, then ended up in a
prep school after failing to make the minimum score on his SATs.
tom
|
15.1269 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Thu Nov 12 1992 08:45 | 5 |
| Oh MAIN! Ya mean da Hoosiers and Sir Bob Knight finally got some nuke-clear
wide-body studs! Oh Main, my thighs are a shuddering....and MrT is all
thrust up and knobby ;-)
JD
|
15.1270 | Hate to say it but.. | ROCK::MURPHY | | Thu Nov 12 1992 15:37 | 9 |
| I don't think Indiana even has to wait until next year. They should win
the Big 10 even though it is tough and the Michigan players are off the hook.
I just hope the Lou Doo can get the Illini back to 20 wins. From the I would
have to see it to believe it department, at Illinois Midnight madness, they
turned the lights down, put a coffin at midcourt, shined down a spotlight,
and the players lifted the lid. Out popped Lou dressed as a vampire. Bet
he looked like Grampa Munster....
Murph
|
15.1271 | We're Number 1.......or not | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | Barth,Coover,Robbins,MrT | Tue Dec 01 1992 18:31 | 10 |
|
Pat Graham *appears* to be out for the year after suffering yet
another broken foot in Indiana's win over Fla. State in the pre-
season NIT. There's still a slight chance that he could be ready
by tournament time, but given his history it's unlikely they'll rush
him back. Always a shame to see a guy lose a year of eligibility.
Next up: #1 (in one poll) IU vs. #2 (in some) Kansas
tom
|
15.1272 | dominating last night | CNTROL::CHILDS | Karoke Hockey catch the fever! | Wed Dec 02 1992 09:25 | 7 |
|
Especially when you been waiting to see this guy break through. Tough break
for Pat and IU.
Wonder if Chris Webber has NBA #1 draft pick 1993 on his mind??
mike
|
15.1273 | RoyWilliams (i.e. DeanSmith) > Bob. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 07 1992 11:14 | 1 |
|
|
15.1274 | Whar's MrT when ya need him? Calling Cap!! | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Mon Dec 07 1992 11:18 | 1 |
|
|
15.1275 | Bigot10 clearly 2nd tier. (ACC alone on 1st.) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:44 | 4 |
| Awful quiet in this_here "Big Ten" conference today. Heh heh!!
- ACC Chris
|
15.1276 | | ROYALT::ASHE | What people do... for money... | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:48 | 3 |
| Michigan lost to Duke. Not a surprise to me the way they struggled
against Rice. Didn't see the KU-IU game... so?
|
15.1277 | But the Big Ten is overated.... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Mon Dec 07 1992 15:20 | 7 |
|
ACC-Chris Duke is alone on the top tier not the ACC. (See NC,
NC State....etc.
Chappy
|
15.1278 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | The bill is due for the last 12 years... | Mon Dec 07 1992 15:30 | 5 |
| Chriss.
After Duke, the Acc is toast. Didn't IU beat FSU?
JD
|
15.1279 | Overrated --- maybe | CSOA1::SIMPSON_T | Barth,Coover,Robbins,MrT | Mon Dec 07 1992 19:07 | 16 |
|
IU did beat FSU...alsoUCLA and Seton Hall on their way to the
pre-season NIT title.
The Kansas games was disappointing only in the free-throw shooting.
Other than that, both teams played pretty well. Indiana once again (must be
five times already this year) blew a substantial lead, but that has more to do
with playing a lot of people than anything else. That problem should be worked
out by the time the Big 10(1) season rolls around. Good to see Cheaney
continuing his excellent play, and Bailey having his first good game of the
year. They'll need him if they want to be a contender.
Next up: Tuesday at Notre Dame
tom
|
15.1280 | Triple ouch tonight | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Tue Dec 08 1992 09:26 | 12 |
| -1,
Well tom,
You can send your cheerleaders up to South Bend to beat ND tonight.
Gradiation hit 'em bigtime with LaPhonso, Bennett and Sweet gone
and the pickin's mighty slim ( thanks Digger for sitting on yo' fat
arse for the last couple). MacLeod's gonna have a rough year.
You know things ain't gonna be right when their captain
is 'Brooks Boyer'. Sounds like he should be playing polo pony.
MikeL
Who don't want to look up the score in the AM
|
15.1281 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Please George don't sign Boggs | Tue Dec 08 1992 09:27 | 10 |
|
I can see Michigan and Indiana being rated this high. But Iowa
in the Top Ten. Please! I saw them play the week before last and they
weren't that impressive. Plus one of the polls has 7 Big ten Schools in
the top 30. That is overating a conference.
Chappy
|
15.1282 | Overrated? | ROCK::MURPHY | | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:08 | 8 |
| re -.1
We'll see - methinks the Illini have righted themselves after the early one
point setback. The Missouri and Texas games will tell the tale. I would
agree that Iowa is a little high, but still a top 20 team. OSU plays on the tube
this weekend so we'll get to see how good Funderburke is carrying the team.
Murph
|
15.1283 | Ohio State Buckeyes @ Lawrence Funderburke | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 23 1992 10:05 | 22 |
| > we'll get to see how good Funderburke is carrying the team.
OSU has two (2) consecutive L's (West Virginia on the road; North
Carolina at home) but Lawrence Funderburke is extraordinarily talented.
His arm length reminds me of Pervis Ellison or Sam Perkins -
incredible. The Bucks will be okay - they've got alot of young,
talented players. Ayers just needs to decide who he wants to play
and stick with 'em.
Watch out for this club come year-end. (BTW, Funderburp told Dick
Vitale during the shoot-around that UNC was his 2nd choice to Indiana
outof high school. I knew we were in the hunt for him. Me_thinks if
he'd gone to Carolina the results would've been the same for him - i.e.
he'd simply have a different school that he could've said he was FROM.
I know I critized Bob for how he handled him, but this kid is mouthy.
Never shuts up. Dean doesn't go for that kindof thing any more than
Bob does. Strikes me as a troublemaker with a giant chip on his
shoulder.
- ACC Chris
|
15.1284 | deja vu | DDIF::MCEVOY | | Wed Dec 30 1992 09:07 | 10 |
| Big win for the wolves last night. Did anyone see the game? I'm courious
to hear how the game went, was NC ahead most of the way? How many did
Webber get, etc.
I saw the highlight of the last second shot by Jalen for the win, it
looked a lot like Higgins put-back to beat Illinois in the '89 Final Four.
Now, hopefully tonight, the Kansas game will finish like the Seton Hall
game did in 89 as well!
-dennis
|
15.1285 | More on UNC vs. Michigan | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 30 1992 12:56 | 9 |
| Dennis, take a look at 17.4532. The definitive UNC vs. Michigan note.
Webber had a nice game - 21 points I think and quite a few rebounds.
(Approximately 11.) Montross and Lynch played him tough though. Eric
changed a few of Webber's shots, and that ain't easy to do. Course
Webber slapped back more than a few would-be UNC baskets. Lynch had at
least 16 rebounds, and Montross had around 11.
- ACC Chris
|
15.1286 | go blue | RAB::MCEVOY | | Thu Dec 31 1992 08:58 | 13 |
| Nice win for Michigan over Kansas last night, sounded a little
easier than the NC game. This should put UM back in the top 5
before the Big 10 opens. I think this tourney shows that Michigan
will be tough come tournament time if they come in on the right
note. For Michigan, I think that means they need to finish 2nd
or 3rd in the Big Ten, drop down in the national rankings so that
they have something to prove in the NCAA's. I think a number one
seed is the worst thing that could happen to them. If they come
into the tourney as a 2 or 3 seed, they will be tough. I hope Duke
goes undefeated in the regular season, stays #1, and saves their
loss for the final four.
-dennis
|
15.1287 | good win | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Thu Dec 31 1992 10:32 | 14 |
| It's a little early to compare Kansas with No Carolina based solely on
how the teams lost to Michigan. Michigan played its best game of the
season lasted night and Kansas simply doesn't match up. The more the
Kansas guards tried to pressure the Rose, the more the middle opened up
for Webber.
This was a much better effort than the No Carolina game. One thing should
be added to Knorr's analysis. While it might have been a great game, the
No Carolina game was not well played by either team.
And all this only emphasizes how good Duke is to be able to beat
Michigan.
TTom
|
15.1288 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Dec 31 1992 10:55 | 12 |
|
No small feat is the fact that Michigan beat 3 top 20 teams over
a 72 hour period! 3 games in less than 3 days and all in the top 20
and all were wins. That's a pretty impressive feat.
Give Michigan another shot at Duke in late February or March and
the results might be different especially if played at Michigan.
bill..g.
|
15.1289 | possible matchups | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Thu Dec 31 1992 11:02 | 15 |
| 3 wins in 3 days are impressive. You really can't count Nebraska as a Top
20 team. I know that's what they were rated going into this tourney but
losing to SW Louisiana ain't what it takes to stay with the elite.
Musing on a Michigan-Duke rematch shows how important the seedings are
for the NCAA tourney. In the Rainbow Classic tourney, Kansas, No Carolina
and Michigan could all be final 4 teams. Throw Duke into this mix and
probably Kentucky and it's clear that not all will get there even if you
don't consider upsets and choke jobs. The semis could be final 4 type
matchups.
In any case, if'n Duke and Michigan get to play each other again, it'll
be on a neutral court and not in the midst of the crazies in Durham.
TTom
|
15.1290 | oh yeah: don't forget Indiana | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Thu Dec 31 1992 11:03 | 0 |
15.1291 | More ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Thu Dec 31 1992 11:09 | 17 |
| TTom's right - the Michigan vs. UNC game was not terribly well played.
Carolina shot the ball extremely poorly and had way too many unforced
turnovers, especially in the first half. Michigan lost won of its
SuperSoph's early and I was less than impressed with their
replacements.
Didn't see the Kansas vs. Michigan game last night. (Although I must
admit to being a tad impressed with TTom's love for the game - a 1AM
start time is nothing to sneeze at!) Michigan had to be feeling
confident after beating Nebraska and Carolina. Meanwhile Kansas had
walked thru an incredibly easy draw. Whoever did the pairings for this
Tourney must've been drunk at the time. Michigan, UNC, Nebraska, and
SW Lousiana all in one bracket, meanwhile Kansas was paired with
absolutely nobody. Weird.
- ACC Chris
|
15.1292 | Happy New Year to all | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Thu Dec 31 1992 11:22 | 8 |
| Chris, I wish I could claim that I stayed up for the game. In fact, it
just turned out that I was just coming home from getting ready for this
latest holiday season.
All in all, the Rainbow tourney was a classic, bracket pairings
notwithstanding.
TTom
|
15.1293 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 31 1992 13:38 | 2 |
| I believe the brackets were set up to assure that host-school
Hawaii did not end up playing in the 7th vs 8th place game.
|
15.1294 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hello�, is there anybody out there.. | Mon Jan 04 1993 17:20 | 1 |
| FWIW, Andy Van Slyke thinks Iowa will win it all...
|
15.1295 | verdict is out | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Mon Jan 04 1993 18:17 | 11 |
| I saw that.
Iowa has a lot to get through to get there. Let's see how they do after a
couple of games against Indiana and Michigan. The Acie Earl-Mr. Robinson
matchups could be worth wathcing as well.
From my view there's a handful of top teams right now: Duke, Kansas,
Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky and possibly No Carolina. Iowa and Purdue are
probably in the nexted tier with Seton Hall.
TTom
|
15.1296 | | DUGROS::ROSS | Baby Makes Five | Tue Jan 05 1993 15:20 | 6 |
| Michigan plays at Purdue on Thursday night. A Purdue win would probably
move them onto the edge of Top 5 territory {which is about 15 places too
high, in my view... they've squeeked by in a number of games}.
It'll be interesting to see how the Robinson/Webber matchup turns out.
Too bad the chances are slim-to-none that we'll see many more of them.
|
15.1297 | DeanSmith sporting .658 win pct. over Big10. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Jan 06 1993 17:09 | 19 |
| Dean Smith's record vs. Big10:
Michigan 2 2
Indiana 4 5
Ohio St. 5 1
Penn St. 3 0
Iowa 0 2
Northwestern 2 0
Purdue 5 2
Michigan St. 2 0
Minnesota 0 1
Illinois 2 0
TOTAL: 25 13
HTH,
- ACC Chris
|
15.1298 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Wed Jan 06 1993 17:27 | 5 |
| THAT'S why they never play the Gophs! He loses and then refuses to
reschedule.
Spud
|
15.1299 | all games are not equal | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Wed Jan 06 1993 18:18 | 12 |
| > Indiana 4 5
Wasn't one of the these a late season peak for Isiah and the rest of the
Hoosiers in 81?
> Iowa 0 2
I remember one of these when Gamble (I recollect?) was given the ball to
shoot free throws when someone else had been fouled. At Chapel Hill, no
less!
TTom
|