T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
282.1 | No they are not overrated. | CRATE::PACE::WATSON | Knowledge is power. | Tue Jun 18 1991 19:24 | 31 |
| Linn dealers get the std 30% markup (Same for all electrical goods in
the UK I think).
As for are they overrated - I spent a lot of my (misspent?) youth
working for mu local Linn/Naim/Ion/Rega... dealer and can say that all
these people are very nice but certainly don't think their stuff is
overrated.
I have spent a lot of my own hard earned cash on Hi-Fi and belive that
I couldn't get a better sound for the money I've spent (At the time I
spent it) and Yes I have got an all Linn system. You may say that I get
a discount - which is true - but I could get the same discount on
anything from Sanyo to Sony (To Krell for that matter).
But as I.T. said If you can't here the difference then don't but it -
maybe your listening too hard ?
Talking of Linn ...
New baseboard will be about by this Sept.
Much will happen at Chicargo Jan-92
Expect the following
Linn A/D - Transport to follow
New Low-end LP-12 (No valnalla or Lingo)
New replacement for 'bricks - based on Kaber technology.
+ More
1992 will certainly be a busy year for Linn...
|
282.2 | Yes, I really do like Linn | CRATE::PACE::WATSON | Knowledge is power. | Tue Jun 18 1991 21:43 | 17 |
| Woops, sorry as some would say ``carnt trype for nits''
It will be a D/A not an A/D.
Getting back to the note (Perhapse I should enter it in AUDIO with Linn
replaced by Krell :-) I personally prefer Linn stuff. Though that
doesn't mean I'm a Linn biggot I use to have a (special per production)
RB300 from Rega which Linn admitted was better then their Ittok but
this has since been replaced by a better spec Ittok, then a Ekos.
A lot of people come close (Roxan/Ion/Naim) but for my money (which
after all is what it is) Linn still win (but only just in some cases).
Another thing I like about Linn is their policy on upgrading. You can
convert an original 197% (Is % a wildcard in ULTRIX :-) LP-12 to (just
about) current spec. And they just offered to convert my 1914 vintage
'briks to curent spec for �300-00 not a bad price.
|
282.3 | it's a fair cop | HAMPS::IVES_J | I've got a bad feeling, Mr Tracey! | Wed Jun 19 1991 11:50 | 7 |
| fair points ! I'm not a fanatical Linn hater, I just don't find them
very inavative or frward looking compared to the likes of Meridian or
Musical Fidelity. I'm glad to hear they plan a CD player (or at least
the convertr), maybe I'll then stay in a hi-fi shop when I realise
the're a Linn dealer.
When will they replace those Isobaiks though ( 2 channel mono !) :-)
|
282.4 | What me, biassed...? | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:11 | 30 |
| Linn may have been overhyped in the past, but only by the media. Things
aren't so bad now. Some hifi journalists have spouted a lot of taurus
guano over the years, both pro and anti Linn, but then their job is to
sell magazines!
Linn may not appear very forward looking because their public face
deals with conventional product. What goes on behind the scenes in
developing that product and understanding others would convince you
they are very forward looking. They just don't jump on bandwagons.
As far as bias in this conference goes, I can see why you feel like
that but I can assure you it is not a concious decision on anyone's
part. It's probably just that those of us who have chosen to spend our
hard-earned on Linn kit are very enthusiastic about it. If owners of
other manufacturers's kit do not feel enough enthusiasm for their
systems that may (and may not!) say something about the role it plays
in *their* lives.
As far as being unconvinced by dems of Linn kit, that's fine. Linn
openly say that they would rather you listened first, even if you buy
someone else's kit afterwards; then *you* have made a decision on
*your* criteria. Those of us who are convinced by Linn dems just happen
to share Linn's priorities when it comes to judging what we will get
into debt for! If the dealer who gave you the dem didn't explain what
Linn's priorities were, then he/she wasn't doing their job; if they did
but you didn't understand, again they weren't doing their job; but if
you understood but judged by something more important to you, great.
It's your money.
Dave
|
282.5 | Two channel Mono | CRATE::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:30 | 14 |
| On a (slightly) more serious note.
Isobariks have often been critisised by the press for their ``mono'' sound.
A lot of this was due to people (The reviewer) placing in speaker too far apart!
'Briks shouls be placed close together fireing up the length of the room. Even
then they are not as good as say the _old_ Qual ESL but they should match most
other things. Another thing to remember is they are very revealing to the extent
of showing up faults in the mastering process. 24-track recording can sound very
mono (One channel per track if you see what I mean) even on well set up 'briks.
On the other hand good quality two track can sound ... well I'll leave that up
to your ears.
It this mono-problem is at a friends tell him to try moving them around a little
- a few inches can make all the difference.
|
282.6 | | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Wed Jun 19 1991 14:41 | 10 |
| Linn and the other very expensive stuff is basically for
people who are first and foremost enthusiasts.
Paying ten times as much as base level equipment, for what
is a marginal improvement is justified as being the price
necessary to obtain the best.
Most people just think it's a waste of money.
-John
|
282.7 | Steer the note back on course. | TASTY::JEFFERY | I shot the sherrif (and the deputy!) | Wed Jun 19 1991 16:38 | 11 |
| I think there is a danger of changing the base note from debating about
Linn, and debating about High End Hi Fi. If you compare Linn on price
to high end Hi Fi, then Linn would be seen as a mid-range solution!
People who like Linn, would argue that Linn is excellent value high end
Hi Fi, and maybe that Linn sounds better than anything else.
Noter .5 has to decide (looks like he already has), whether or not, any
extra money is worth it.
Mark.
|
282.8 | How hi is hi? | BAHTAT::SALLITT | | Wed Jun 19 1991 16:54 | 8 |
| re. 6....
Linn isn't all hi-end. They make some competetively priced and
competent entry level kit. As Mark says, pricewise Linn aren't hi-end
anyway. Compared to the *real* hi-end, Linn is very cost-effective,
cheap even!
Dave
|
282.9 | | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Thu Jun 20 1991 13:41 | 22 |
| So Linn isn't expensive?. What's the price of the standard
setup then -
Table
Arm
Cartridge
Stylus
Pre-amp
Amp
Tuner
Tape deck
CD player
Speakers
Cables
Assuming of course that they can actually supply all these
essential� items.
-John
Personally I no longer consider a record player essential but
some do.
|
282.10 | Linn are good value for money | CRATE::PACE::WATSON | Knowledge is power. | Thu Jun 20 1991 14:03 | 36 |
| So Linn isn't expensive?. What's the price of the standard
setup then -
Table Linn Basik �400
Arm
Cartridge
Stylus
Pre-amp Linn Intek �400
Amp
Tuner Aiwa �120
Tape deck Aiwa �120
CD player
Speakers Linn Index-II �200 (More for stands)
Cables �2-15 per meter
Assuming of course that they can actually supply all these
essential� items.
Linn's policy on things like tuners and cassette decks is not that
there is anything wrong with them mearly that they don't want to
produce them. Any Linn dealer will be happy to recommend good quality
alternatives (I just picked AIWA 'coz they are good value). I bet you
would get a Sony rep saying that - you see Linn aren't that blinkered.
(Yes I know that Linn are producing a Tuner at �1300 but by their own
admitance that is a lot of money a ``specialist product'')
PS The prices here are guesses I could be wayout. I never spend less
that �1000-00 on any single part of a Hi-Fi system 'coz it just
wouldn't sound good enough (PS That was a joke - my Tuner is a �30-00
end-of-line ex AIWA rack system - but its OK for what I want)
-Rik
Personally I no longer consider a CD essential but
some do :-)
|
282.11 | | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Fri Jun 21 1991 05:58 | 7 |
| re: .9 Well, I let my ears determine value for money, not my wallet.
When I hear something that sounds good, I then decide if I want to continue
listening to what I was before. Sometimes I can, sometimes I can't.
I would say without hesitation that Linn have offerred me value for money
for every one of my purchases of their kit. No, I don't have an all-Linn system.
|
282.12 | | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Fri Jun 21 1991 10:05 | 18 |
| Re. .11
>re: .9 Well, I let my ears determine value for money, not my wallet.
>
>When I hear something that sounds good, I then decide if I want to continue
>listening to what I was before. Sometimes I can, sometimes I can't.
>
>I would say without hesitation that Linn have offerred me value for money
>for every one of my purchases of their kit. No, I don't have an all-Linn system.
Not prepared to say how much though!
Re. .10
Ok so we've done the garden shed, what about the living room?
-John
|
282.13 | :-) all the way to the bank. | CRATE::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Fri Jun 21 1991 11:10 | 23 |
| �Re. .10
�
�Ok so we've done the garden shed, what about the living room?
?
Confused - are you saying that the Linn system proposed in .10 doesn't
sound good enough. It (probably) would sound better just about any CD
system (Independent of price�) and as such represent good value for
money.
To get a CD which sound as good as a Linn Basik I guess you would have
to spend over �1000-00 on the player alone - then you've got to get a
tuner, tape deck, amp, speaker ... :-)
I guess a top flight Micro Mega CD or Arcam 170 + External DAC would
match the Basik and the Naim CD would beat it (But that is extremley
good value for money at �3000-00 :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) )
(I've never heard these CD's so I'm only guessing)
|
282.14 | | HAMPS::LINCOLN_J | Where sheep dare | Fri Jun 21 1991 14:41 | 14 |
| I am clearly at a considerable adbantage inasmuch as I
have heard both CDs, and LPs. What astounds me about LPs
is how absolutely huge they are and no sooner have you put
them on the bit that goes round and dropped the needle on
'em, they've finished playing.
I have one or two CDs that are transcripted from the days
of direct recording on disc, and with these you can enjoy
the rythmic clicks, rumble and hiss, just as you'd get
from the Linn. Perhaps if CD makers were to record special
versions especially for shellac enthusiasts, complete with
all these familiar sounds they'd come around to buying them.
-John
|
282.15 | Correction to Linn Basik price... | FORTY2::GROOM | | Fri Jun 21 1991 17:16 | 8 |
|
A Linn Basik turntable and Akito arm (at pre VAT increases pricess) retails at
about �250, plus �90 for a K9 cartridge.
So if you have paid �400 for a Linn Basik then someone REALLY has ripped
you off!!!
Alex.
|
282.16 | | FORTY2::SHIPMAN | | Fri Jun 21 1991 20:08 | 34 |
| I don't think Linn kit is overrated. Overhyped, perhaps, but the main thing is
that Linn follow through with a considered and well-engineered product line
and a professional dealer network. Linn is mentioned a lot here, but I'm sure
that's just because Linn is very popular and very successful. They offer a
particular, consistent, designed sound that's very attractive to most who hear
it. To the charge that non-Linn users aren't enthusiastic about their kit I
could answer that perhaps they're more interested in listening to it than
talking about it? No, to be honest I'd like to post an evaluation of my own
system but it's a lot of work and I guess I just haven't got round to it.
I don't think it's fair to compare this kit with real cheap stuff. For record
decks, it'd be a good idea to compare only that kit that doesn't destroy
your record collection. The comment in .6 about Linn being ten times the cost
for marginal improvement would suggest a �25 record deck. Fair comparisons
would be with the Regas and Thorens of the market rather than midis or SP25s.
Re the comment on Isobariks putting out two-channel mono, you might be
interested to hear them on Mana stands. I heard these at John Watson's (Mr.
Mana, man) house, and they were more like stereo than any other Isobarik
installation I've heard.
.13 suggests an Arcam Delta 170 and outboard DAC might match a Basik. Well I
have a Delta 170 and Musical Fidelity Digilog, and used to have an Axis/Basik
Plus/K9. No question, the Axis stomped all over the CD. I don't know if a
Basik would do as well, but its arm is certainly a lot better than the one on
my old Axis - arm resonances were my main complaint with it.
I don't have any Linn kit now, but I am indebted to them, via my old Axis, for
showing me how good a record player could be. It pushed me into getting a
system that gets me closer to the music than I'd thought possible. Even
though I didn't end up choosing the 'Linn sound', Linn made a real difference
to my life. No exaggeration.
Nick
|
282.17 | Linn aren't so bad | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Wed Jun 26 1991 09:52 | 19 |
| In this discussion it might be as well to mention what Linn are trying
to achieve. I'm no Linnie, but they tell me that Linn try for putting
across the tune, that is being able to follow the timing of the tune
and continue it for yourself if the music stops. Also included are
pitch stability and clarity (to be able to discern differing notes).
You can hear Linn fans listening to a terrible din that has wonderful
rhythm and timing, though not all Linn systems are like that!
Meridian go for reproducing a realistic scale of music, essentially
soundstaging / imaging (Linn don't relly believe this is part of the
music).
Pink Triangle are for reproduction as close to the master tape as they
can get.
IMHO, the ideal would not be one of the above, but a combination of all
three. I have to say though that Linn do achieve their aim, at least
with their more expensive systems.
|
282.18 | prologue | HAMPS::IVES_J | I've got a bad feeling, Mr Tracey! | Wed Jun 26 1991 12:27 | 12 |
| Well that seemed to provoke a good deal of interest !?
Clearly a lot of people out there are happy Linn users, which is after
all good especially as Linn are a UK firm.
One final question:-
what kind of music do you Linn users listen to in the main ?
Can I guess ?
|
282.19 | I love music | CHEST::WATSON | Blood on the Rooftops | Wed Jun 26 1991 14:56 | 24 |
| I listen to everything from Pink Floyd to Prokofiev (sp?). But I don't
like Rap or Reggie (Though they do sound good on my system�). I think
that a ``good Hi-Fi'' (whether Linn or otherwise) will encourage
(enable?) the listener to enjoy a wider field of music. There was a
time when I could only listen to ``Pink Floyd ~ The Wall'' but for
example this is the last batch of records I bought (Off the to of my
head but you'll get the idea)
Chris Rea - Auberge
Rick Asley - Free
A collection of Handel's works for Harp
Some Jazz group I've never heard of but the record was �0.99 (A few
good tracks as well)
Cindy Lauper - ??
American Rock Legends (Or something like that)
Seal - Seal
All for less than �25-00
Rik
�What do you mean NOT ENOUGH BASS ?
PS I have well over 500 records about 150 of which are classical.
|