Title: | You get surface noise in real life too |
Notice: | Let's be conformist |
Moderator: | GOVT02::BARKER |
Created: | Thu Jul 28 1988 |
Last Modified: | Mon Jun 02 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 550 |
Total number of notes: | 3847 |
Now that digital sources are becoming commonplace why not, I wonder ,extend digital control to the entire hi-fi system?. Audio reproduction was an entirely analogue, open loop system, and this is where the errors creep in. With an open loop system the individual components need to be of precise quality in order that each stage of the process introduces as little error, ie distortion, as possible. Microphone produces analogue signel Signal recorded on tape Tape transcribed to disc Disc applies movement to stylus Stylus motivates cartridge Cartridge generates analogue signal Amplifier amplifies signal Speaker converts signal to air movements. Plenty of scope for degradation as comparisons between the best and the worst will show. Nowadays the microphone may produce digital codes and these are committed to CD discs without degradation but that's where the story stops. The digits are converted to analogue and the rest of the process remains unchanged. However it seems to me that it would now be possible to close the loop by use of computer technology. Monitor the position of the speaker diaphragm with a digital encoding transducer, probably optical for zero mechanical contact, and then it's possible to replace all of the intermediate stages between disc and diaphragm movement with a positioning servo system. The D-A convertors which appear to be the main weakness of current CD players would go and the amplifier no longer needs to be of great precision since within a closed loop system such things aren't critical. With the current sampling rate for CDs of 44.1 kHz you'd need a microprocessor capable of at least 2 mips in order to execute the servo code in the time available. Such processors are commonplace today. Given that even top class sytems produce some 10% distortion (mostly from the speakers) there would also appear to be an enormous improvement to be gained here. If one wanted to be truly pedantic you could place a microphone in the room at the listening position and compare it's output with the source data. This might also reduce speaker characteristics. Far fetched?, I don't think so. I once worked on some software not so very far removed from what's required here and it would be simple enough, though one imagines that some programs might perform better than others!. I wonder whether this is being worked on now. I notice that many CD players are available with digital outputs nowadays. It's said they're so you can do A-D within the amp and avoid the intermediate analogue stage but does it have to stop there. -John
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
208.1 | Life's not that simple. | TASTY::JEFFERY | Tears of disbelief spilling out of my eyes | Mon Sep 24 1990 09:52 | 13 |
I seem to remember that some people are working on Digital speakers, with 16 different 'binary' speakers. You've got to remember though, that digital audio equipment is incapable of fully rendering the continuous nature of music. You can compare the original digital input, and the resulting digital output, but this, of course, may bear no resemblance to the analogue input and the analogue output. Cheers. Mark. | |||||
208.2 | They are behind us | UFHIS::JMASLEN | The wheels fallen off your day yet?! | Fri Oct 26 1990 18:19 | 16 |
Re 1 & 2. Keep your eye (the good one that is!) on a UK firm called MERIDIAN (they already have an outboard D-C converter) who are currently working towards your idea of room compensation and digital signaling to the last stage (the amp/speaker). Interesting stuff......which is why I am holding back on preamp purchase to see what the future turns up....it just stupid to convert to analogue so early in the chain if digits are going to become the future storage medium......my experience to date is that digit players cost a lot more than the old analogue information retrieval units (turntable!!) of similar 'picture'/event reproduction quality...forgetting the CD versus LP wear/sound arguments as well as the consumer costs for CD (3x in my case) versus LP. I have both but digit hardware is so young and underdeveloped as of yet! cheers fjeff who's-keeping-his-LPs-anyway-! |