T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
626.1 | Hold back that righteous indignation | KERNEL::MORRIS | Which universe did you dial? | Fri Mar 26 1993 11:51 | 16 |
| Les,
Tell 'em the _whole_ story!
Because of complaints from customers and senior internal Digits, we
discussed Voicemail at the team meeting yesterday. The decision made
was to turn off Voicemail and re-implement it "properly".
No decision was made about how this will be done or how long it will be
"off". Clearly, if there are any Teams whose customers would be
negatively impacted, they should discuss this with their Manager.
Doubtless consideration will be given to all reasonable deputations.
:o)
Jon
|
626.2 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:03 | 4 |
| What a ridiculous waste of money that was then!!!
Ian
|
626.3 | What ? When ? Why ? Who ? | KERNEL::BELL | Hear the softly spoken magic spell | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:55 | 40 |
|
Re .1 (Jon)
> Tell 'em the _whole_ story!
Yes, please do !
> Because of complaints from customers and senior internal Digits, we
> discussed Voicemail at the team meeting yesterday. The decision made
> was to turn off Voicemail and re-implement it "properly".
1) What is the nature of the "complaints" please ?
Is it that people are apparently not returning calls (eg., bad manners) ?
That people are apparently not receiving the messages (eg., system bugs) ?
That the recorded messages are not always informative ? (eg., smart-*rses)?
2) How are the customers involved ? Are they being put straight through
to the specialists' phones ? Are they being given information second-
hand ?
3) Who are the "senior internal Digits" and what is the nature of their
complaint please ? Are they the same people who complain that there is
no one available to take a message ?
> No decision was made about how this will be done or how long it will be "off".
Has a decision been made as to when this will be done ? Is anyone going to
tell us or is it another thing that we have to glean from the notes files ?
> Clearly, if there are any Teams whose customers would be
> negatively impacted, they should discuss this with their Manager.
... or leave them a voice-mail ? Err, ...
Thanks in anticipation of more of the _whole_ story,
Frank
PS : "senior internal Digits" ... heh, heh ... should we tell 'em to get
their fingers out ? :-)
|
626.4 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:04 | 19 |
| Personally I have found voice system very useful.
It would be a great shame to lose it.
Obviously it is frustrating when you phone someone and you keep getting
voice mail but otherwise you would get engaged tome or no answer
anyway.
Unfortunately the system does need a bit of discipline to work
properly, like leaving a new greeting regularly to let the caller know
if you are out of the office or not.
The biggest problem witth the new phones in general is that you can't
visibly tell if the phone is forwarded or not. Maybe this contributes
to the frustration because people are at their desks but forget their
phones are forwarded to voice mail. My high tech workaround is to leave
a post-it with 'forwarded' on it stuck to the phone to remind me.
Royston
|
626.5 | It's Got to be said... | WIZZER::MACLEAN | A Pure Dear In a Wicked World | Fri Mar 26 1993 17:22 | 37 |
|
Has anyone actually been asked what they think the advantages /
disadvantages to *US* (the CSC specialists) are ????.......
Given that at lunchtimes we are fairly sparsely strewn across
the unit ,having people call forward to Voicemail actually
saves the remaining few people having to play secretary and
message-taker for the whole unit!..Thus letting us get on with
the job we are actually employed and skilled for ....
I guess the problem is that front-end may be saying I've left a
message in their voicemailbox..this would appear to always imply
that the person isnt there and doesnt suggest that they may just
be on the phone to another customer ....
In fact it is easier to listen to a voicemail and look at the call
log rather than trail slowly through NICE commands to List your
message,show the call,show the descriptions,look at the individual
description etc,etc....Fortunately the good people of the call desk
tend to leave both currently (Pat on the back Chaps/chapesses)
It is also most useful for asking a low priority question to someone
with particular skills who you know can answer that question but is
currently not available....
Really what we need is a defined set of common practice in message
standards so that it's less haphazard ... eg.
"I'm out of the office Here's who to call..."
"I'm at lunch ,the Hunt Group number if it's urgent is" etc....
Why EXACTLY is it being turned off ,WHO is it noising up?
Okay it has it's problems as Roy's mentioned but In my opinion
***it is helluva useful !!! ****
Sandie.../
|
626.7 | Pros & Cons. | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | | Fri Mar 26 1993 20:37 | 13 |
| As a semi-outsider I find that they are troublesome. There appears to
be an inconsistency between how rigorous people use them. Some people will
invariably return all my calls, whilst others seem to ignore me. The
messages however do not tell me if they are at lunch, out onsite, or
have died the previous day. AVAIL is not always up to date.
I have developed my own system for working around the system. Since I
have an LED readout on my phone I can see straight away if the phone is
forwarded, so I hang up and phone the person who sits next to them,
and so on until I get an answer and then ask is So&So around,
invariably the answer is yes, but if not I send my message by VAXmail.
Huw. (NUK Comms group)
|
626.8 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Mon Mar 29 1993 13:32 | 14 |
| I take it there will be an official announcement shortly
and that users in the CSC will take part in looking at
ways of improving the system (or whatever they plan to do
with it).
I can see that it must be annoying when all you get are
voice mail messages, but that's still got to be better
than no reply or an engaged tone.
I think we should be able to set up a few messages, one for
when the phone's busy, one for when we're out, etc...
Ian
|
626.9 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | Use the subjunctive! | Mon Mar 29 1993 13:43 | 8 |
| Voice mail may or may not be appropriate for internal people. However,
customers should NEVER get put through to it.
The customer used to be king. Now the most important, overriding task
is to SAVE MONEY. Customers like good service, and there's plenty that
will give it if we don't.
Keith
|
626.11 | | COMICS::PEWTER | | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:42 | 9 |
|
I think it's a really useful tool. As previously pointed out, customers
do not ring specialists directly here at the CSC. And I find it much
better to have a voicemail message from response saying a customer
called than just having a comment put on the request. I think it is
definately worth perservering with.
Karen
|
626.12 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Mar 29 1993 15:47 | 10 |
| �customers do not ring specialists directly here at the CSC.
Apparently this is not true.
Some of the hardware specialists give out their direct lines to
customers all the time as they prefer to work that way.
I can only assume that its their customers that are complaining.
Royston
|
626.13 | "In the absence of facts, rumours will always attempt to fill the gaps" | KERNEL::BELL | Hear the softly spoken magic spell | Mon Mar 29 1993 16:58 | 10 |
|
> Some of the hardware specialists give out their direct lines to
> customers all the time as they prefer to work that way.
>
> I can only assume that its their customers that are complaining.
If that's the case then the sensible thing to do is ...
.. oh-oh ... I said the "S" word again didn't I ?
Frank
|
626.15 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Mar 30 1993 14:10 | 10 |
| I'm a bit confused now. The consensus of opinion is that voice mail
should only be heard by internal people and not by customers.
But surely internal people have access to electronic mail,
making voice mail redundant.
Can anyone explain why we should buy in a third party voice
mail system when we all have access to e-mail?
Ian
|
626.16 | Re -.1 | WIZZER::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Tue Mar 30 1993 15:36 | 15 |
| > Can anyone explain why we should buy in a third party voice
> mail system when we all have access to e-mail?
The advantage of voicemail over e-mail is that you can access it
with nothing more sophisticated than a telephone.
For instance, if I've requested help from an engineering group
I know that that if they leave a message I'll be able to get the
information whether I'm on site or at home (or even on holiday,
for that matter).
Of course, this benefit is completely negated if voicemail is
turned off with no prior notice!
Ian.
|
626.17 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:22 | 14 |
| I've managed to get a bit more detail. This is all I know so
please don't ask any more questions.
When voice mail was implemented in the CSC, the management
team did not issue guidelines on how the system should be used.
Hence, some groups have been using it effectively whereas
others have not and there have been complaints. It has therefore
been decided that guidelines will be issued to voice mail
users so as to eliminate complaints. In the interim, the
voice mail system may be temporarily switched off depending
upon the nature and seriousness of the complaints.
Ian
|
626.18 | Not enough attention to detail | COMICS::WOOD | Mother played by Peter Beardsley, father by John Cleese | Wed Mar 31 1993 11:17 | 10 |
|
I think these problems reflect on the CSC as a whole. Some people's refusal to
set up a voice mail message says alot about their attitude. Where were the
quality people when voice mail (and the new phone system) set up. Has voice
mail been considered as part of our Quality System ?
The human element of this technology has not been given the attention it
deserves !
Richard
|
626.19 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Apr 05 1993 17:51 | 14 |
| As Richard says, there are some people who refuse to use voice mail.
The problem here is that an entry exists for all extensions and a
message can be left even if no greeting is set up (you just get
"please speak after the tone").
Obviously these messages will not be heard if the flashing message light
is ignored.
I wonder if this has added to the frustration and led to complaints.
The answer here would be to identify these extensions and remove them
from the system. I've already discussed this with Simon Lobar.
Royston
|
626.20 | | WIZZER::FISCHER | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Apr 06 1993 14:20 | 7 |
| I'm a little surprised that there has been no "official"
word on this yet, but then, the system hasn't been
switched off.
Ian
|
626.21 | It's official - it's a girl | KERNEL::MORRIS | Which universe did you dial? | Thu Apr 08 1993 09:21 | 9 |
| Be not surprised, the Project Manager for Voicemail has had other
things on his mind for the last few days!
Simon will be sorting out Voicemail when he gets back from paternity
leave and before he departs Digital at the end of the month. In the
meantime, as stated in .1, if you have concerns, please talk to your
Manager.
Jon
|