T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5108.1 | | LEXSS1::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Jan 28 1997 15:18 | 7 |
| This was pretty thouroughly beaten to death a week or so ago. If you
stay here until minimum retiremetn age and retire, you havent lost
anyting. If you leave before retirement age, you never did have a
retirement medical benefit anyway, so you havent lost what you never
had.
I dont recall the previous note, but its in here.
|
5108.2 | | BUSY::SLAB | As you wish | Tue Jan 28 1997 15:46 | 7 |
|
See note 5085.
It could have been found by doing a
DIR l-1/TIT = RETIR
|
5108.3 | If you're using a command line interface? | COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner | | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:16 | 7 |
| Or by clicking on Directory, Other Criteria, Title: <enter something>, if
you're using Teamlinks conferencing. We can't just assume that everyone in
these conferences can do a DIR etc. etc. I haven't seen a Notes command line
in years.
Jay
|
5108.4 | | ORION::chayna.zko.dec.com::tamara::eppes | Nina Eppes | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:30 | 12 |
| >We can't just assume that everyone in
>these conferences can do a DIR etc. etc. I haven't seen a Notes command line
>in years.
Nowadays I usually say something like "use DIR/TITLE or the equivalent in
whatever Notes client you're using." It's tough to cover all the bases these
days... :-) (Though you can enable a command line in TeamLinks Conferencing
that lets you enter DIR/TITLE, etc.)
- Nina
|
5108.5 | | BUSY::SLAB | As you wish | Tue Jan 28 1997 16:47 | 7 |
|
RE: .3
Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
|
5108.6 | | vaxcpu.zko.dec.com::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Jan 28 1997 17:33 | 7 |
| Personally I use a search engine such as:
http://altavista.notes.lkg.dec.com:8000/
and for this conference would use a search string such as:
+url:digital +... and so on
|
5108.7 | NetNotes format | smurf.zk3.dec.com::wolf95.zk3.dec.com::PBECK | Paul Beck, WASTED::PBECK | Tue Jan 28 1997 17:39 | 9 |
| >
> RE: .3
>
> Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
>
> COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
>
Teamlinks may. NetNotes definitely does.
|
5108.8 | Teamlinks personal name - yes | COPS01::copras1_port10.cop.dec.com::skinner | | Tue Jan 28 1997 18:50 | 1 |
| Teamlinks puts the name in that form, yes.
|
5108.9 | well it looks like NOTES outgoing on the STAR cluster is not using the IP alias :-) | galaxy.zko.dec.com::VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Jan 29 1997 00:33 | 16 |
| >> Is it TEAMLINKS that puts the username in this format?
>> COPS01::kiji.cop.dec.com::skinner
> Teamlinks may. NetNotes definitely does.
The client could be sending everything after COPS01::,
but in most cases it's the NOTES servers that prepend
the source nodename or hostname for each hop (ie.
including intermediate hops).
For example, I opened this conference as:
OPEN/NONOTEBOOK star::humane.mro.dec.com::digital
and the author field should have:
star.zko.dec.com::VAXCPU::michaud
|
5108.10 | Senior employees aren't loosing, juniors are gaining | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed Jan 29 1997 12:48 | 10 |
| Usta be if you worked at DEC for 25 years or more and were still
working at DEC when you reached 55, you got the bennies.
So....you still have to have at least 25 years of service and you have to
be here when you hit 55.
Same difference. Your first 15 years of service were from age 30 to age 45
and your final 10 were from age 45 to age 55.
Nothing's changed 'cept the wording
|
5108.11 | Clarification | STAR::PMOSTEIKA | Paul, ZKO3-4/s31, 381 (881)-1075 | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:57 | 24 |
| RE: 5108.2 - yes I did do a directory. Even though I waited what seemed to be
a very long time, I did not see a note appropriately titled. Note 5085 has a
title of retirement package. This is the problem with notes, the chances are
if you look long enough, you'll proabably find at least a handfull of other
notes regarding the same question/answer. But not all are obviously titled,
which holds true for replies as well.
I did call back to our Benefits group (which is not DEC) with my question.
They claim that you:
don't have any benefit, or should I say that you do not qualify for
any reduced medical coverage retirement benefit just because you work
for DEC for 25 years. That you do qualify after 10 years if you work
between age 45-55 and must retire from DEC. All they are doing is making
it avaliable sooner.
Well that sure is looking at it from another angle. I have not checked
my records, but I was under the assumption that a worker with 25 years
or more service was entitled to certain retirement benefits. Of which
this was just one, even if you retire from some other company. So I stand
corrected unless I find otherwise.
Paul
|
5108.12 | Always had to "retire" to be eligible for medical benefits | VSSCAD::SIGEL | | Tue Feb 11 1997 16:55 | 33 |
| Re .11
The 1991 Benefits Book, which came out before the 25-year rule was
instituted, stated clearly that you could retire from Digital only
if you were 55-64 and had worked at Digital for at least 10 years,
or 65 and older and had worked for Digital at least one year.
Furthermore, you had to work at least 30 hours a week to be eligible
for medical benefits. Pension is only affected by vesting rules --
by law, once fully vested in the Pension plan, you're eligible to get
the pension even if you leave Digital before retirement age.
The book stated specifically, "Also ineligible [for medical benefits]
are employees who leave Digital before retiring."
This wasn't changed when the 25-year rule was brought in for medical
benefits (announcement, mid-1993; effective 1/1/94); the 25-year rule
just told the retiree how big their contribution to the medical benefits
would be if they retired from Digital. You still had to be a retiree
as laid out in the above rules.
So, since formal retirement from Digital is not possible before age 55,
and the new medical benefits rule starts counting the new 10 year requirement
at age 45, there is no net loss for anyone now under age 45 who has
accumulated any number of years of service, since if they stay at
Digital until they're at least 55 they'll have the ten years they
need, and if they don't stay that long before they leave they won't
be eligible for retirement benefits beyond taking their pension with them.
This is advantageous for new company hires 45 or older since they only
have to work 10 years to get full medical benefits, which presumably makes
Digital more attractive for certain employees.
-- Andrew
|