T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3301.1 | Demand = Ready, Willing, & ABLE Buyer! | ABACUS::CARLTON | | Wed Aug 03 1994 12:11 | 3 |
| Marie, maybe for lack of employees who lack for money??!!
Jack C. - how ya doin'?
|
3301.2 | Brokers to be unknown | MEMIT::MMCCALLION | | Wed Aug 03 1994 16:39 | 4 |
| Hi Jack.. Still here huh? Me, well maybe another 6 months or maybe
I'll be gone by the end of August, can't tell...
I could have used a few more bookcases...
|
3301.3 | Is the store really gone? | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Tue Aug 09 1994 18:39 | 3 |
| I just tried VTX PDCSTORE and got a message that this "page" is gone. Is
that the same message .0 got? This implies but doesn't prove that the store
is gone. Can someone confirm that it's gone?
|
3301.4 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Aug 09 1994 18:47 | 1 |
| When I did VTX PDCSTORE a few days ago, it said the PDC Store was closed.
|
3301.5 | ...closed... | KELVIN::KELVIN::BLISS | Ralph Bliss MLO5-3/E35 dtn:223-4202 | Tue Aug 09 1994 23:40 | 4 |
| Stop looking in VTX. The PDC that was located at the Mill is closed.
It's last day was Saturday, July 30th.
(My group's lab is across the hall...a scant 12 feet away.)
|
3301.6 | Anyone know why? Or where they're reopened (hope,hope)? | NEPHI::COAR | Rodent of Unusual Size | Mon Sep 05 1994 13:35 | 0 |
3301.7 | I too thought a new site with MLO closing | MEMIT::MMCCALLION | | Wed Sep 07 1994 10:53 | 2 |
| Business decision, Digital needs to make money. Materials will be sold
off to Brokers (their identity is unknown).
|
3301.8 | Still miffed, though... | TALLIS::PARADIS | There's a feature in my soup! | Wed Sep 07 1994 17:16 | 9 |
| In addition, I heard that the planned restructurings and building
consolidations would generate FAR more surplus material than the PDC
store could possibly handle. At the same time, the quantities are now
large enough so that brokers would be interested. Therefore, the
economical thing to do was to close the store and get rid of the
surplus in large lots rather than in onesies...
--jim
|
3301.9 | What about DEC groups that NEED furniture? | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Fri Sep 23 1994 15:17 | 7 |
| I realize that selling surplus furniture in bulk is more profitable BUT,
there is now no efficient way to redistribute used furniture within Digital.
We can't look for it in DIAL (because DIAL doesn't allow people to list it)
and now there is no PDC store. Does the PDC itself have any used furniture,
or does it go directly from the closing DEC plants to the broker?
Who is the broker that is buying this stuff? Can Digital groups that need
used furniture buy from them?
|
3301.10 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | Wicked Wench of the Web | Fri Sep 23 1994 16:55 | 3 |
| Here at the CSC in Colorado we just got e-mail that offers
office furniture to H.O.M.E. workers only. They can buy excess
desks, lamps, chairs and file cabinets for $1 a piece. liesl
|
3301.11 | | GLDOA::POMEROY | | Mon Sep 26 1994 09:48 | 6 |
| They did the same in Detroit. Many of us got some pretty good
deals. We were told we could take 4 pieces each. The rest
will be going to some company who is giving us a bulk rate to
take it off our hands.
Dennis
|
3301.12 | Not more profitable | SNAX::PIERPONT | | Mon Sep 26 1994 11:02 | 15 |
| Re: .9 Morrison
< I realize that selling surplus furniture in bulk is more profitable
< BUT,
When I bought at the PDC just before they closed, I was told the
brokers paid about 35 cents on the PDC dollar [but they had to take
everything in the lot].
Another beni gone...
< there is now no efficient way to redistribute used furniture within
< Digital.
Howard
the corporation seems to have little problem redistributing furniture
inside the company [see notes about the 'old FXO furniture'].
|
3301.13 | Furniture a-plenty!!! | MR1MI1::SHERWIN | Jim Sherwin | Mon Sep 26 1994 11:47 | 44 |
| RE: .9
The initial avenue to dispose of excess furniture is via internal
transfer. Only after this avenue has been pursued is the excess
furniture sold thru brokers.
The PDC was never meant to be a significant channel for us to
dispose of 10's of 000's of pieces of excess furniture brought
about by the many building closings. It was never used "to
redistribute used furniture within Digital" it was only used to
sell to employees for personal usage. It was essentially a
convenience to the employees. With the closure & ultimate sale
of the Mill and pressures on the PDC, my guess is it was a
convenience we could no longer support.
If you have need for furniture, you should exprees your need to
your Building Services Mgr. He or she if very likely tied into
the excess furniture distribution process. Yes, there is a
process.
1. The Bldg Svc Mgr where the excess furniture is located, obtains
a DIAL waiver, from the PDC, by listing the excess furniture with
MR. X.
2. Mr. X circulates the info on the xcess furniture to his
distrubution list, consisting of 90+ names, of Property Mgmt
type employees around the world.
3. These indivduals can pick and chose what they want for their
respective facilites.
4. What remains after typically a 2 week review period, is then
collected, aggregated and sold, via a bidding process, to
brokers.
I've purposely not id'ed MR. X, as he is one individual, doing
this for the entire, US. He doesn't need to be inundated with
requests from individual employees.
I hope this clarifies this issue.
Rgds,
JIm
|
3301.14 | Throw money away | STAR::BUDA | I am the NRA | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:02 | 13 |
| The PDC store used to bring in $10k-$20 on a good weekend. At one point I was
told they were doing $1mil+ a year. This was BETTER than they could have done
buy selling it to wholesalers. I do believe this.
I was recently at a place thathas a lot of DEC 'excess' material.
They were selling surplus DEC plastic bags for $10 a case. PDC used to sell
them to employees for $10 a case. These guys paid under $5 a case. There are
MANY items at this place just like this...
DEC throws money away again!
- mark
|
3301.15 | Is there a list someplace | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Thu Sep 29 1994 15:08 | 2 |
| Is there a way to find out who the brokers are that Digital sells
to.
|
3301.16 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Fri Oct 14 1994 17:23 | 3 |
| > Is there a way to find out who the brokers are that Digital sells to.
I would like to know too.
|
3301.17 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Fri Oct 14 1994 17:33 | 21 |
| > <<< Note 3301.13 by MR1MI1::SHERWIN "Jim Sherwin" >>>
> If you have need for furniture, you should exprees your need to
> your Building Services Mgr. He or she if very likely tied into
> the excess furniture distribution process. Yes, there is a
> process.
But why must this be a "closed" process that only the Building Services
Mgrs can pursue?
I think management's perception is that only Facilities people are inter-
ested in obtaining furniture. This is not true. There are some engineers, such
as me, who are responsible for obtaining lab benches and tables for our own
lab space.
This time I got lucky, in that our facilities group was able to find the
furniture I needed within the cluster of facilities they manage. If our fac-
ilities group had had to search outside the cluster, and had not been willing
to do so, I would have been stuck.
We should not have to buy back our own furniture at a 100% markup, but this
is still cheaper than buying it new, and probably cheaper than spending 40
man-hours doing an exhaustive search of all the facilities clusters to see if
any have the items we need.
|
3301.18 | | MR1MI1::SHERWIN | Jim Sherwin | Wed Oct 19 1994 12:00 | 45 |
| > Note 3301.17 by TOOK::MORRISON "Bob"
>> <<< Note 3301.13 by MR1MI1::SHERWIN "Jim Sherwin" >>>
>> If you have need for furniture, you should exprees your need to
>> your Building Services Mgr. He or she if very likely tied into
>> the excess furniture distribution process. Yes, there is a
>> process.
>But why must this be a "closed" process that only the Building Services
>Mgrs can pursue?
By default, The Bldg Mgrs have had this responsibility "dropped" into
their laps. Considerable quantities of equipment, of all sorts, have
literally been walked away from or abandoned by groups which move to
another facility or are disbanded. The Bldg Mgr is then responsible
for the disposition of such equipment as part of the building cleanup.
For all intents, the Bldg Mgr, in concert with the MR X, I mentioned
in .13, are "THE" channel for excess equipment redeployment, w/in the
company at this time.
>This time I got lucky, in that our facilities group was able to find the
>furniture I needed within the cluster of facilities they manage. If our
>facilities group had had to search outside the cluster, and had not been
>willing to do so, I would have been stuck.
I've been involved in equipment redeployment from the 3M area to as far
away as Singapore & Taiwan. I repeat "if you have a need, express it
to your Bldg Mgr". If he or she either doesn't know how or is unwilling
to tap into the redeployment channel, you should approach your Cluster
manager. Keep in mind, if your need is instantaneous, you'll probably
be out of luck; regretfully, the redeployment process is at times
laborious, circuitous, time consuming & frustrating; all brought
about by the sheer volume of excess equipment being generated.
>We should not have to buy back our own furniture at a 100% markup, but
>this is still cheaper than buying it new, and probably cheaper than
>spending 40 man-hours doing an exhaustive search of all the facilities
>clusters to see if any have the items we need.
I don't understand your reference to buying back our own furniture at a
100% markup. There may, in some cases, be a need for an asset xfr but
you don't "PAY" anything. Much of the equipment being redeployed is
xfr'ed at $0 NBV, so you don't even incur future depreciation.
|
3301.19 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG1-3/A11 226-7570 | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:27 | 35 |
| This is a very belated reply to -.1.
> >But why must this be a "closed" process that only the Building Services
> >Mgrs can pursue?
I understand that building services managers are responsible, by default, for
getting rid of excess furniture. My concern is why they have a monopoly on
OBTAINING used furniture.
We already have a powerful computer tool (DIAL) for redistributing non-
furniture items. Why can't we use this for funrniture? The DIAL login message
says we can't. I assume it's not because of any limitation in the DIAL system
itself.
> manager. Keep in mind, if your need is instantaneous, you'll probably
> be out of luck; regretfully, the redeployment process is at times
> laborious, circuitous, time consuming & frustrating; all brought
> about by the sheer volume of excess equipment being generated.
I gave myself a month to get the stuff I needed. Part of the problem with a
closed process was that I never knew if it was just a slow process or if
Facilities had given up on looking for the stuff.
> >We should not have to buy back our own furniture at a 100% markup, but
> >this is still cheaper than buying it new, and probably cheaper than
> I don't understand your reference to buying back our own furniture at a
> 100% markup.
I didn't make myself clear. At one point I considered calling used furniture
dealers to see if I could get the lab benches that way. If I had known which
brokers had bought Digital's used furniture, I would have called them. If one
of them had had the stuff I needed, and if it had been former Digital stuff
that they bought at 50 cents on the dollar (actually 35 cents, according to an
earlier reply), and if our group had bought it from them, we (Digital) would
have paid double what we sold it for.
|
3301.20 | a Canadian Source | KAOOA::PINKERTON | Prov 3:5-6 | Fri Jan 06 1995 12:04 | 4 |
| In Canada Call Al Leblanc DTN 621-4722 . He periodically publishes a
list.
GP
|