T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2374.1 | I got my first deposit in a little over 2 weeks | TELGAR::WAKEMANLA | You Bloated Sack of Protoplasm | Tue Feb 16 1993 17:30 | 0 |
2374.2 | DEC's TRAVELETTER Savings Are Costing Me! | MSDOA::JENNINGS | | Tue Feb 16 1993 19:34 | 9 |
| Mine is taking an average of 4 weeks. I do not have direct deposit,
which would knock off perhaps one of the weeks, but I'm still
financing my own business expense for at least 3 weeks, averaging
a couple hunderd dollars per week.
I don't understand why a "permanent advance" would not be reasonable
since we no longer have TRAVELETTERS, for those of us who travel
week in and week out. I can't believe Bob P. believes it's fair for
employees to have their own money tied up for 3-4 weeks...
|
2374.3 | Your mileage may vary | SCAACT::RESENDE | Subvert the dominant paradigm. | Tue Feb 16 1993 20:11 | 5 |
| Well, I just received electronic notification last week (about 4 weeks) for my
1st voucher after the cut-off of Traveletter 1/16. But my management is
remote, so there is mail delays that may not be typical for all. I'm expecting
4 weeks to be the norm in my case, which is a problem given travel requirements
of the job.
|
2374.4 | not a happy camper | GUIDUK::EVANS_BR | Bruce Evans, CASE Consultant | Tue Feb 16 1993 20:26 | 10 |
| For the Record --
my co-worker and I both have electronic deposit and are getting close
to getting a bad credit rating due to DEC. I just got e-mail (A1mail,
so what) stating that I got my trip refund (FINALLY!!!) after 4 weeks
in *their* hands.
I'd like to have my suspicions allayed that they only cut "checks"
every 2 weeks, so tuff noogies if you slip in just after the cut-off.
Bruce (the-extremely-ired) Evans
|
2374.5 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Wed Feb 17 1993 00:04 | 7 |
|
It's pretty disgusting that a $14B company is floated loans by
its employees. I wonder when someone is going to start charging
interest and late fees?
mike
|
2374.6 | | DREUL1::rob | depending on His love | Wed Feb 17 1993 04:26 | 16 |
| RE charging interest, etc...
I know of employees here in Germany that have a seperate account for travel
expenses, and who do, in fact, charge DEC for interest. However, it's a bit
easier in Germany, since it is possible to have a disposition credit on your
accounts at the bank. Essentially, the bank floats you a loan whenever you
have an overdraft, and you are "allowed" to over-draw your account up to a
certain maximum. And even if you go over that maximum for short periods, they
usually give you a couple weeks to get it fixed before getting nasty.
Also, by having a seperate account, it's also possible to charge DEC for the
expenses incurred by that account, ie normal bank charges and administrative
fees. I've never done it myself, although I see some advantages to doing it
that way.
Rob Marshall
|
2374.7 | No Comment? | FHOPAS::JAMBE::Mac | Lemmings are Born Leaders! | Wed Feb 17 1993 07:38 | 9 |
| RE: Previous
4 1/2 weeks and counting!
This is the first transaction being processed this way for me, as I've
always utilizied travelletter prior to this without any problems.
Hope they have a "continous improvement program" factored into this
new process, they have a long way go!
|
2374.8 | exception to every rule?? | CSOA1::ECK | | Wed Feb 17 1993 07:52 | 4 |
| I must be the exception, but an expense report was submitted on 1/30/93
and I got direct deposit reimpursement on 2/5/93. Is everyone sure that
it's not sitting in a local office inbasket or outbasket??
|
2374.9 | There MUST Be A Better Way! | MSDOA::JENNINGS | | Wed Feb 17 1993 09:02 | 7 |
| Re: .8
Yes, indeed - SOME of the delay is likely to be from sitting in
someone's in/out basket. Nevertheless, it still should not be the
employees burden to bear. My manager never committed that he would
be at his desk every day to approve and forward expense vouchers,
nor would I expect him to.
|
2374.10 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Wed Feb 17 1993 09:35 | 11 |
|
Why doesn't DEC just pay off everyone's American Express Corporate
balance directly, instead of AE billing the employee?
Then all we would have to do is reimburse DEC for expenses that go
beyond what DEC pays for.
No waiting, no loan floating. But does this open things up for abuse?
-=- Paul
|
2374.11 | $1600 and counting | ODIXIE::WESTCL | Gator Golfer | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:15 | 10 |
| I have submitted on-time expense reports to my manager no later than
Monday of the following week each week. I know that her sec. is mailing
them immediately, via U.S. Post Office, to the processing center. My
first expense report thus submitted was for w/e 1/23. I have received
NO reimbursements as of today (2/17) My outstanding expense voucher
balance with the company is over $1600. I spoke yesterday to a real
person in the disbursements office. They are looking into my
situation. I, too, hope that the company is monitoring this situation
closely because I certainly will have a problem financing my travel
expenses.
|
2374.12 | I'm seeing improvements! | POBOX::GREENE | | Wed Feb 17 1993 10:22 | 20 |
| I mailed my last expense voucher to my manager for approval on
01/25/93. I received expense transaction notification that it was being
deposited into my account on 02/05/93. Pretty good turn around, IMO.
FWIW, my manager happens to reside at the same location that our FMC is
located. I've got to believe that helps the processing cycle.
This is an improvement over last year's experiences:
1. Mail expense voucher from Chicago to Colorado Springs for CC
manager's approval.
2. Expense voucher approved and mailed from Colorado Springs to
Littleton, MA for higher level approval.
3. Expense voucher approved and mailed to FMC in Colorado Springs for
processing. (Processing in Maynard FMC actually took more time.)
4. Electronic notification of deposit.
Recent cost center changes helped eliminate the mail back east.
Kevin
|
2374.13 | Bad decision | CSC32::N_WALLACE | | Wed Feb 17 1993 11:35 | 6 |
|
It is wrong for DEC to require their employees to float the company
loans.
This is an unethical business practice. Plain and simple.
|
2374.14 | be clear and be careful | NETWKS::GASKELL | | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:03 | 5 |
| It does help if the forms are written clearly, that all necessary
receipts are included, have the correct signatures (to cover
items that are now designated EXCEPTIONS), and the addition is correct.
I know that sounds a bit obvious, but you would be suprised how
many vouchers are held up for these problems.
|
2374.15 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Wed Feb 17 1993 14:13 | 18 |
| RE: .14
FWIW, I use the VOUCHER program for my expense vouchers. I have
a computer do the math (novel idea) ALL my vouchers are so clearly
written that it would take Mr. Magoo to screw them up. I double
and triple check all entries and so does my secretary. Even then it
took me a few weeks to get the $140 that DEC owed me back.
Oh, and if it wasn't for my (great) manager at the time, DEC was
going to ask ME to float them over 2-3K in charges incurred during
travel and "they would reimburse me".. Yea, maybe a month or
two later after I've paid the interest.
No thanks.. I and my (great) manager said NFW. I told them I
didn't have the credit limit. There was no recourse but for them
to give me an advance.
mike
|
2374.16 | | RAYBOK::DAMIANO | You're overpaid...Hit the road | Wed Feb 17 1993 14:16 | 4 |
| Could someone post a phone number or E-mail address to contact? I haven't
seen a single reimbursement since this program started.
|
2374.17 | The number you have reached.... | 10386::GOLDSMITH_TH | Tom Goldsmith | Wed Feb 17 1993 15:50 | 14 |
|
FMC HOTLINES: HOTLINE NUMBER (DTN)
Tempe, AZ 566-5780
Merrimack, NH 264-1970
Maynard, MA 223-1311
Shrewsbury, MA 237-3101
Colorado Springs, CO 522-3201
PAYROLL HOTLINE 223-2463
CORPORATE TRAVEL HOTLINE 223-8297 or 226-7413
|
2374.18 | Use AMEX | ODIXIE::GORNEAULT | Being politically correct is being mentally inept | Wed Feb 17 1993 17:12 | 18 |
|
So far I havent gotten any money deposited either. I gave it a try
and so far it is not working.
In my case this does not save digital money. I am on temporary
assignment and have to live completly on expenses.
I was living in a apt before Xmas @$700 (when we had travelleter).
Since Jan I have had to live in a places that takes AMEX. This
means 55-65 per day 1500-1900 per month. I have expense backed
up and more going into the pipe. My AMEX card is now up to 3k or
so.
Nobody really cares as long as you are in the guidlines. You can
no longer do the right thing even if you wanted to.
t.
|
2374.19 | Finally - relief! | GUIDUK::EVANS_BR | Bruce Evans, CASE Consultant | Wed Feb 17 1993 19:31 | 16 |
| Just for the record...
I got A1mail yesterday that said in 2 days I'd have funds in my
account to pay Amex, and today when I called the electronic bank teller
(what a *great* idea -- it sounds like a human, instead of FRANK!) the
funds were there.
I'm relieved, and I know Amex will be happier - I know how upset
they get when they have to fill out the forms giving me (or anyone) a
bad credit rating.....
FWIW - I agree with the thought that DEC direct pay Amex and collect
from me the difference. Crud, that's the way your manager stays on top
of your situations (oops, that's the old DEC again... sorry! :-)
bwe
|
2374.20 | Tickets purchased in advance may bite you! | 35261::OBLACK | Marty OBlack | Wed Feb 17 1993 23:04 | 17 |
|
Approximately one month wait for me. I too have received notification
that funds are on the way. The delays are in part due to my location
because my expenses must be forwarded by mail to our manager. He and
his secretary are doing their best to cut the delay by arranging for
other (closer) managers to have signature authority.
I went ahead and took a (personal) cash advance on my credit card to
fund my last trip. I already had a DINERS bill in hand for the two
previous trips for which I have just been notified I will be paid.
I have accepted the fact that this is another cost of the business
that I will have to carry as an employee. I don't think employees
*should* have to carry the expense float, but that's the way it is
for my situation right now. As I mentioned, my manager is trying to
improve the turnaround time.
|
2374.21 | What is needed to turn Traveletter decision around? | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Wed Feb 17 1993 23:40 | 11 |
| - I take on early plane ticket expense load to secure a lower fare and
take Saturday overnight stay over to lower fare as well. The very least
DEC could do is to promptly pay the bill. I find it hard to imagine
that the Traveletter cost the company soooo much - I find it easier to
believe some unethical (or at least unconcerned) bean counter decided
it was more profitable & politically cleansed to take out of my pocket
for the sake of the interest. Until folks start travelling again in
the numbers that they did in the past, there may never develop enough
groundswell to reverse or modify the inequity and unethical nature of
this policy. Then again, groundswell and 'doing the right thing" may be
passe' - it's hardly efficient business like behavior, now is it?
|
2374.22 | No money, noe-mail, ... | GRANPA::MJBOOT::FLANAGAN | Jim | Thu Feb 18 1993 06:06 | 14 |
| Another horror story for the record ... I am also on temporary living
and have to file expenses every week. So far it has taken five weeks
for every disbursement and I have never received notification of any
kind. I have been performing work for a cost center "serviced" by the
Shrewsbury hotline, with that cost center providing expense relief to
another cost center "serviced" by Merrimack. When I call the hotlines,
at various times they have blamed each other, managers in the approval
chain, and even the local e-mail router (There are two Jim Flanagan's
on this router).
The time I've spent on the phone trying to determine the source of the
problems more than offsets the savings of axing Traveletter.
Jim F.
|
2374.23 | anyone? | CSOADM::ROTH | MC5: Kick out the jams! | Thu Feb 18 1993 08:38 | 4 |
| Does anyone know (or has anyone succeeded) in getting DEC to pay for airfare
IN ADVANCE rather than having to put it on your 'company' AMEX or DC card?
Lee
|
2374.24 | | PRAVDA::JACKSON | King Cynic | Thu Feb 18 1993 08:53 | 14 |
| RE: .23
Yea, it's easy.
Don't have a corporate credit card, then it's not put there (since they can't)
and DEC pays for it.
This is precisely why I don't have corporate AMEX or Diners Club.
-bill
|
2374.25 | Worked for me | SAHQ::LUBER | Atlanta Braves: 1993 World Champions | Thu Feb 18 1993 08:54 | 3 |
| My secretary mailed two expense accounts up north on Feb 12 and I
received electronic notification this morning, Feb 18, that the funds
would be deposited within two business days.
|
2374.26 | If you've got it, you must use it. | BTOVT::SOJDA_L | | Thu Feb 18 1993 09:03 | 14 |
| Bill's answer in .24 to the question of whether or not you can get
Digital to directly pay airfare is right on. I used to have air
tickets paid directly before I had an AMEX card and always liked it.
After I got a credit card, I had our secretery try to continue to do
this. She tried several times and was unsuccessful. The answer always
came back, "If you've got a credit card, it must be charged to you not
the company". For the life of me, I never figured that out.
The same thing is true for rental cars. You can't get one of those
one-time vouchers if you have a credit card. It seems to me that there
should be some way to short cut all the paper handling.
Larry
|
2374.27 | Automation??? | ODIXIE::WESTCL | Gator Golfer | Thu Feb 18 1993 09:40 | 11 |
| I thought we were a computer company. Here we are arguing over a
process that could be easily automated to everyone's advantage. If a
manager has signature authority to approve your expense report, why
can't that same manager submit your balance electronically to our
disbursements office who would then electronically pay you???? The
cotton pickin paperwork could catch up to the electronic system later.
If there are discrepencies they could be handled on the back end.
Or, maybe that's too simple.
CW
|
2374.28 | Cost control ... not cost savings | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Thu Feb 18 1993 20:53 | 22 |
|
Turnaround for me is averaging 4 weeks. The only real problem is with
advance purchase airline tickets... I get the bill much earlier than
the reinbursement. As long as AMEX understands that I'm not paying
them until Digital pays me, I don't have a problem with the system.
Of course, I do have a problem with the message that said they were
doing this to save costs. They are doing this to regain control.
Its much easier now to reject an expense. They simply don't reimburse
you, and now its up to you to justify the expense. It was a lot harder
when you wrote the check yourself.
Watch for this in the near future... You'll find some beancounter rejecting
your $1 surcharge for an intermediate sized rental car, without ever
considering the comfort of the customers who had to ride with you.
FWIW, intermediate is the norm for HP, (unless there are customer's
present, in which case they use full sized cars) and they get better
rates than we do, including Hertz #1 Gold status. They also use a cash
advance system, rather than Traveletter.
Bob_who's_brother_works_for_HP
|
2374.29 | | SAHQ::LUBER | Atlanta Braves: 1993 World Champions | Fri Feb 19 1993 08:57 | 20 |
| I have a similar situation. Yesterday, I had an opportunity to save
Digital $365 by having the travel agency issue several tickets several
weeks in advance to take advantage of a special fare. In the past, I
would not have hesitated to do this, but with the additional delay
in reimbursement caused by the new system, I was concerned that I would
receive my AMEX bill before I received payment.
I approached my manager, and his response was "You're doing the right
thing by saving the company money. Turn in the tickets in advance of
your travel and I will approve the expense account so that you have the
money in time to pay the bill."
This will work, of course, but I don't know what will happen if I have
to cancel one of the trips, say, due to illness.
I wonder how many of your managers would approve an expense account for
airline tickets in advance of the actual travel date? If my manager
had not suggested this, I would have likely said the hell with it and
spent the extra $365Z
|
2374.30 | bill 'em early | TENAYA::ANDERSON | | Fri Feb 19 1993 11:00 | 11 |
| re: .29
I've done this before. If the tickets are paid for in advance,
it's perfectly reasonable to expense them. If you have to
cancel the trip, you'll have to refund the money less any cancellation
fee.
The trick is what to put as your receipt for the ticket. What I
do is a photocopy of the ticket stub and I send the original after
I've flown. You can also use an invoice from your travel agent
if you get anything like that.
|
2374.31 | Bill when tickets received | 17007::PETTIGREW | | Fri Feb 19 1993 16:55 | 6 |
| I have consistently received my voucher reimbursements 3 weeks after
the week-ending date (I mail them to my manager on the following
Monday or Tuesday).
Non-refundable tickets must be purchased (and paid for) 1-3 weeks in
advance, in order to get the 50% - 70% savings.
|
2374.32 | It only takes a week! | GLOWS::MENDEZ | Semper Fi | Fri Feb 19 1993 17:40 | 7 |
| I don't submit expense vouchers that often but when I do it
usually only takes a week to get reimbursed. I believe if
your office submitted the vouchers to payroll on time
then the most it should take is a week and a half.
mm
|
2374.33 | Why don't more managers use common sense? | SMAUG::GARROD | From VMS -> NT; Unix a mere page from history | Fri Feb 19 1993 18:37 | 23 |
|
Re:
> I wonder how many of your managers would approve an expense account for
> airline tickets in advance of the actual travel date? If my manager
> had not suggested this, I would have likely said the hell with it and
> spent the extra $365Z
As a cost center manager I insist that people avail themselves of cheap
tickets ie non refundable, 2 weeks in advance etc if at all possible. I
also enforce the
hotel room rate schedules for cities. I require explanations if
something is above recommended limits or someone avails themselves of
one of those exhoritant airfares. If the explanation wasn't good enough
I'd have no hesitation in refusing to sign the expense claim. Luckily
so far I've never had to do that. The flip side of that is that I'll
help people save the company money. Eg if they've had to spend the
money then as far as I'm concerned they can put in an expense claim or
have an advance to cover it.
I believe this sort of thing is nothing more than good management and I
wish more managers would actually look at what they're signing or be
held responsible for signing something they shouldn't have.
|
2374.34 | Worked for me | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Fri Feb 19 1993 19:56 | 4 |
| My first foray into electro-reimbursment netted me a response 3 days
after submitting 3 vouchers and my money in my checking account 2
days after that. Worked ok for me the first time 'round. I'll see
how it does this Monday.
|
2374.35 | Varies by region ?? | CGDEIS::WILEY | Marshall Wiley - PSS | Sun Feb 21 1993 11:47 | 8 |
|
Let's see now... I turned in my expenses Feb. 2 and the secretary
mailed them out Feb. 3. On Feb. 20 I get a mail message that
my expenses were processed Feb. 12, but I will have the money in
two business days. From when ??? Were they actually deposited by
Feb. 16, and they just didn't bother to tell me ? Or were they
processed on the 12th, but just now got to Petty Cash ? In either
case, I'm not impressed with the response time.
|
2374.36 | Normally 4 day turn around, including inter-office mail | NYAAPS::CORBISHLEY | David Corbishley 321-5128 | Mon Feb 22 1993 08:51 | 2 |
| I deal with the NNEFMC and normally see a 4 business day turn-around, including
inter-office mail from New Jersey to MKO.
|
2374.37 | One small blip remains | ODIXIE::WESTCL | Gator Golfer | Mon Feb 22 1993 16:03 | 5 |
| Today I received a check for the first three weeks expenses since the
Travelletter went south (wks 1/23-2/06). My only problem now is that
they were supposed to make a direct deposit, not send me a check.
CW
|
2374.38 | my two cents | 29169::GILDER | | Wed Feb 24 1993 10:57 | 22 |
| I haven't read all the answers. I am not a frequenter of this notes
file, but I do like to get caught up now and again....
Someone had our Expense Voucher put on line. It's great and can get
your expense voucher done in very short time. It does all the
calculations for you.
Your secretary will probably end up checking it anyway. That's how
it's done here. A manager doesn't sign it until the secretary has her
initials on it. Then it goes to FMC. Us secretaries are well aware
how important it is for Individual Contributors to get their
reimbursements quickly. We don't let them sit on our desks for more
than a couple of hours....
By the same token there are several I.C. who will come back from a trip
and it will be a week or even two before the exp. voucher is done.
Then complain when the $$$ are not in the bank when the bills come in.
It's tougher for those who are in the field. Maybe if you figure out a
way to improve the process you can submit it.
me
|
2374.39 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Thu Feb 25 1993 08:26 | 15 |
|
I disposed of my Travelletter privileges a couple of years ago. It's
easier for me to just request refunds and have them direct deposited to
my DCU account. No running to the bank to cash Travelletter checks.
Everything was going fine until the recent changes. I received a live
check instead of direct deposit for my December expenses. I called
about it and found out that for some reason, I was no longer enrolled
in direct deposit for expenses. So I had to re-enroll using PAYEE.
If you call PAYEE, you can find out what your direct deposit status is,
and make changes if needed.
-=- Paul
|
2374.40 | Seems to be settling down | 17007::PETTIGREW | | Thu Feb 25 1993 15:16 | 3 |
| My most recent expense voucher was paid the week after I turned it in.
That is probably as fast as the system can possibly work.
|
2374.41 | Many reimbursements still outstanding. | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Thu Feb 25 1993 23:14 | 2 |
| There are several of us in my group who still have 3 weeks outstanding
balances due (back to us) and we are not smiling
|
2374.42 | some improvement seen | GRANPA::MJBOOT::FLANAGAN | Jim | Thu Mar 04 1993 11:46 | 14 |
| In an earlier reply, I mentioned that my disbursements had taken a
minimum of five weeks. In fairness to all, it should now be noted that
my last three direct deposits have taken place within 11-14 business days
after submittal of the voucher. Most of this time is attributable to the
managerial sign-off period and not to the folks that do the expense
disbursements.
The expense disbursement process has been improved to the point that I am
satisfied that the disbursements themselves are being made as fast as possible.
Note: There is still room for improvement in the sign-off process, and I can work
that with my own management. Also the improvement does not offset the fact that
Digital is still profiting at my expense from the interest it gains by taking
away Traveletter.
|
2374.43 | has it been 35 days yet? | DLOPAS::PAMSIC::STEPHENS | | Thu Mar 04 1993 13:13 | 26 |
| The current reimbursement system works, however it is error and
delay prone. For those of us folks in the field, who cannot "walk"
the paperwork through the system, it has been my experience that
from the time I snail mail the voucher till the money is in the bank
the average is 35 days. It has been as short as 21 days, however it
also has been much longer.
An alternative: Company charge cards, billed directly to DEC, a system
(i.e. computer...we have the technology) which can process the card vendor's
billing data and cross reference online expense vouchers by transaction
number, etc. Everything else, that cannot be charged, is covered by a
per diem rate/city.
Another Alternative: A system "like" traveletter, where the CC manager
authorizes an individual for an amount, say $1000.00. A person fills out
a expense voucher, and sends it to the paper mill as usual. The person then
can call a system, like the Payee Phone, to request a deposit from the
authorized pool of $1000.00. This call is a "one-shot" which must be "reset"
from the CC manager receiving and OK'ing the voucher. The CC manager can
then call the system, and re-validate the $1000.00 authorization, only on
a weekly basis.
Another Alternative: Keep the same system, but eliminate all paper. The
individual keeps receipts, everything else is online.
Last Alternative: It wasn't broke...so go back to Traveletter.
|
2374.44 | One week turnaround | MSDOA::FLACK | Enter catchy name here | Thu Mar 04 1993 14:38 | 7 |
| My reimbursement has worked great. I completed the expense form on
2-22-93 and mailed interoffice that afternoon to my manager. I received
notification on 3-2-93 that money would be direct deposited. 6 working
days is not bad.
Of course having a manager that does not let them lay in the inbox
helps also.
|
2374.45 | An IDEA? | ODIXIE::WESTCL | Gator Golfer | Thu Mar 04 1993 16:12 | 11 |
| I have submitted the following basic idea thru the IDEAS CENTRAL
process. What do you think?
The approving manager, at whatever level that occurs, should send an
e-mail to the disbursements office authorizing payment of the amount of
the approved expense voucher to the employee. Simple??
Quick?(assuming you have a decent boss)? Any adjustments can be
handled later, just as was the case with Travelletters. If you wish to
see the text of my IDEA, see the IDEAS conference, note 391.3 (they
buried it with some petty cash automation idea that I don't understand
since we don't have petty cash in many field locations.
|
2374.46 | Travel/expenses, no problem here... | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Fri Mar 05 1993 03:11 | 31 |
| Don't know if it helps, but here in VBO (France) we use an (almost)
completely electronic system called Travel Management System (TMS)
Roughly it works as follows:
System has a database with employee data, travel data, conversion
rates, CC and signature authorization, signature passwords....etc.
1- Employee fills in electronic travel request at any time
Eventually submits the request.
2- Request goes to CC manager, his/her delegatee, others depending
on hierachy of signatures required...
2a)Request goes to AMEX office for early ticket reservation
3- When request is properly approved (electronic signatures)
AMEX issues the ticket, advance (ca 100$/day max) is paid
by either electronic transfer to bank, or by AMEX if foreign
currency required.
4- emloyee returns and fills in expense claim which has to match
the travel request (except for "local expenses"....)
5- Expense claim goes the electronic signature route
at the same time the receipts checked off by the CC manager
go via papermail to accounting
6- When accounting has received the electronic expense claim,
matched it with the receipts, electronic money transfer to
employees bank is initiated..
We have it in operation now for ca 2 years and it works pretty well
and fast. (In House speced and written)
/fred
|
2374.47 | Coming soon....TMS ???? | 10386::GOLDSMITH_TH | Tom Goldsmith | Fri Mar 05 1993 17:25 | 5 |
|
This may be just a rumor, but I have heard that Travel Management
System (TMS) is planned to replace the current process in this calendar
year. Personally, I'm dealing/coping with 4 week turn arounds. This
includes the US Postal Service overhead.
|
2374.48 | Which FMC are you dealing with? | NYAAPS::CORBISHLEY | David Corbishley 321-5128 | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:39 | 5 |
| I'm under the NNEFMS (Northern New England) and while I'm in New Jersey, my
my turn around, including inter-office mail, has always been 5 business days.
As each FMC is different in how they do business, you might want to check on
this.
|
2374.49 | Not good enough | FPTWS1::ABRAMS | It's foolproof. I should know. | Wed Mar 10 1993 12:54 | 27 |
|
There are just too many variables for some of us. The example below is
typical. When everybody is around, and things go quickly, turnaround is
about 3 weeks, but that's not good enough. For example:
Week 1: Ticket Purchase is charged to credit card.
Week 3: Travel
Week 4: Do Expense voucher. Send by mail to remote manager.
Credit card bill arrives. Due in two weeks.
Week 5: Manager was away a few days, then gets around to inbox. Signs
it late in the week. Secretary sends to FMC a day later.
Week 6: Arrives at FMC. Enters processing late in the week.
Credit card bill is overdue.
Week 7: Electronic mail notice goes out early in week. I can't sign on
to read it because I am traveling again.
Week 8: I get back and find the notice, and send my credit card bill in
two weeks late.
bill
|
2374.50 | Try Advances.. | 10386::WESTFALL_KA | | Fri Mar 12 1993 20:04 | 30 |
| Because I was in temporary living I had lots of expenses happening and
because our management wasn't turning them fast enough I was 4-5 weeks
behind. I finally asked for an advance thinking this would be the
smart thing to do only I asked for a small amount. The day after I
received my advance, they processed two of my expense reports and wiped
out the advance. The policy is to use advance money immediately even
though the advance was dated 2/15 and the expense voucher processed was
dated 1/16 and 1/23.
I didn't get enough to cover my outstanding Diners bill. I went back to
management and requested a $5K advance showing that I still had
outstanding $2.5K in expenses to be processed, with the remaining
projections of what I would spend over the next 4 weeks. It was
approved. Now I'm finally even. Management can still approve
advances with justification.
Another trick I learned, for short term housing for a month or longer,
use apartments that offer executive packages. Digital will directly
lease the apartment for you so you don't have to expense it yourself
weekly. They have already negotiated several of these in major cities
and have a list of approved apartment complexes or used to. It's been
a year since I did it last and things could have changed but it saves
you the trouble of signing a temporary lease. Most major apartment
complexes will furnish it nicely with all the extras including, dishes;
linens; kitchens item, etc; and provide daily or weekly maid service
as well for a lot less than the cost of a residence inn or hotel. Much
nicer environment as well.
Kathy
|
2374.51 | Response - By USC Financial Management Centers | ASABET::ARONSON | | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:58 | 165 |
|
********************************************************************
This Communication is From the Financial Management Centers
********************************************************************
The Financial Management Center's would like to respond to some of
the issues that have been discussed in the notes file. Prior to
addressing these issues, we would like to advise Employees that all
FMCs are processing vouchers within 48 hours, with the majority of
vouchers being processed as they arrive. Once these vouchers are
keyed, they are electronically deposited into you account within
24-48 hours, again in most cases this occurs in 24 hours. The only
exceptions are when the documents cannot be processed, in which case
they are diligently worked to avoid being sent back to the employee,
or when the employee has an outstanding advance issue that is being
worked.
ISSUES AS HIGHLIGHTED ON VTX
1. System Down - With the exception of February 22, 1993, in the
Colorado Springs FMC (Disk Crash), all Employee Expense Systems have
been up and operating as normal. There is an hour or two near the
end of each day that processing and inquiry against the system is
suspended while daily jobs are run. We believe that this normal
computer processing time is what the author is referring to as system
downtime. Normally, we get back to our clients that have questions
either later the same day or early the next day for inquiries that
are made during this computer processing time. Although our
employees are instructed to clearly articulate this situation when a
client happens to make an inquiry during this period, we will
reinforce this with our staffs. Essentially we believe that the issue
is not system downtime, but rather we are not ensuring that our
clients understand the correct message.
If we push back the computer processing until after hours, we would
miss the EDI transmission cycle for EFT, which in turn means that
the Employee reimbursement would be delayed.
2. Mail Time - Mail time can be an issue, particularly when the employee
must mail their voucher for approval to a site that is not close by
and the approver must then forward it to an FMC. We have the
following suggestions, some of which have been articulated prior to
cutting off the Traveletter System
* If possible, Managers should arrange to have someone locally
approved on the SA2 file to approve their expenses. Normally there
is someone local that a cost center manager can delegate approval
signature to. This can eliminate the need to send the voucher to a
distant site for approval.
* Employees or approvers should send the vouchers to the closest FMC
for processing. The only exception is that if an employee has an
advance on one FMC, they must process the expenses on the FMC to
clear the advance. We would also ask that employees are consistent
and utilize the same FMC when possible, otherwise, if they try to
inquire as to status and forget which FMC they sent it to, it will
be a problem for both the employee and the FMCs. (This has
previously been communicated.)
3. MTS Router - There have been some issues with the MTS router which
has impeded our ability, in some cases, to confirm to clients that
their voucher has been received and reimbursement is being made.
An important point to be made however, is that this has not
affected the actual reimbursement, but only the message to the
employee. The more generic issue with the router appears to be
that, for different reasons, mail messages do not get delivered. A
couple of points to mention here are that each FMC works these
rejected messages and makes every attempt to re-address and deliver
the message. Further, the Expertise Center has been working
directly with the owners of the router to resolve these issues. In
addition, Shrewsbury had a specific problem with their router, in
which four days of messages during the week of February 14, 1993
were not delivered, nor did the router create an error message to
the FMC indicating that something was wrong. This was corrected by
the middle of the next week. Routers have been a problem that the
FMCs are trying to work with the application owners. The MTS
routers are moving to a standard platform and this will eliminate
many issues.
Clients can call the FMCs for the status of a transaction if they
have doubts about their reimbursement and we will be glad to help
them.
OTHER SUGGESTIONS:
1. Current Completion of Vouchers - It is advisable for employees to
make sure that they complete their vouchers on a timely basis to
ensure that they allow adequate time for the entire processing
cycle. This is particularly true for the employee that is
constantly traveling to ensure that a fairly consistent flow of
reimbursement is occurring.
2. Approver Cycle Time - Approvers need to understand that they have a
responsibility to their employees to review and approve vouchers on
a timely basis. Past experience has shown us that this is the area
that extends time beyond a reasonable time.
3. EFT - Employees that are enrolled in Electronic Funds Transfer
shorten up the processing cycle by the two to five days it takes
for a check to get to them via interoffice mail, plus whatever time
it takes for them to deposit the check.
4. Signature File Updated - One of the biggest holdups for quick
processing once the documents are received in the FMC is improper
approval. If employees and approvers ensure that the SA2 file is
up to date and the correct approvers sign the document, this is one
less impediment to timely processing.
5. Corporate Credit Card - Corporate credit cards are not only
advisable, but, if two or more business related expenses are
incurred or expected within one year, it is expected that an
employee will have and utilize, wherever possible, a corporate
credit card. Also, this reduces substantially the amount of
personal funds that an employee might have outstanding. And, if
employees and approvers utilize the process correctly,
reimbursement will occur before the credit card bill arrives.
6. Call the FMC - Employees can call Disbursements at any time and we
will provide whatever assistance we can. We have found that there
are very few instances in which our employees cannot help an
employee. To that end, please find attached a list of contacts for
employees to contact.
Financial Management Center
Employee Expense Inquiries
If you have an Employee expense question or would like the status of a
specific voucher, please contact the following Hotline:
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT HOTLINE # HOTLINE #
CENTER LOCATION DTN OUTSIDE LINE
EMFMC MAYNARD, MA 223-1311 (508) 493-1311
MWFMC COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 522-3447 (719) 548-3447
NNEFMC MERRIMACK, NH 264-1970 (603) 884-1970
SEAFMC SHREWSBURY, MA 237-3101 (508) 841-3101
SWFMC TEMPE, AZ 566-5814 (602) 894-5814
Employee Disbursements Contacts List
FMC PRIMARY ELEVATION
Northern New England Cathie Dumas Marc Raposo
264-4460 264-5647
Eastern Mass Paulette Fortin Cathy Boucher
223-7584 223-7551
Southeast Area Pat Girard Joseph Anandraj
237-2068 237-3765
Southwest Helen Lorden Della Hare
566-5865 566-5686
Midwest Ruth Spinney Mary Perdue
522-3447 522-2615
|
2374.52 | huh? | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Send lawyers, guns, and money! | Fri Mar 26 1993 14:56 | 7 |
| If the FMC's are processing the vouchers in 48 hours or "as they
arrive" it must be taking 3 to 4 weeks for interoffice mail to get my
forms from DCO to Shrewsbury! I get my vouchers signed and personally
copy and mail them out the first day back from travel. I'm still
waiting for re-imbursement for week ending 2/27...4 weeks ago.
American express wants their money!
|
2374.53 | Works fine for me | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Tue Mar 30 1993 11:12 | 25 |
| I just had my second experience with the new electro-deposit
expenses. My first report said the response was pretty good. My
second experience was better.
Submitted 5 vouchers on Thu. Secretary mailed them Fri. I got mail
confirmation before COB Tue. Money was in my account Wed. AM.
Our secretary says this is normal turnaround for all vouchers going
through her. We are located in Dayton, OH and send ours to New
England. Since we get consistently good response on our vouchers, we
can think of only a few reasons everyone else reports poorer service.
1) The New England expense clearing house is leaps and bounds better
than the others.
2) The US Postal service between Dayton, OH and New England is leaps
and bounds better than the rest of the country.
3) The time is takes from handing a voucher to someone until actually
making it into a mailbox is leaps and bounds better for my unit
than other units.
Now, without having any emperical data--purely a hunch--I would put
my money on #3.
|
2374.54 | it's better..... | NAVY5::SDANDREA | Send lawyers, guns, and money! | Tue Mar 30 1993 15:40 | 5 |
| I was just pleasantly surprised yesterday with 4 deposits that caught
me up thru the week of 3/20! The turnaround has improved, these
reports were mailed just 2 weeks ago.
Steve (who can now pay American Express)
|
2374.55 | What deterines the FMC? | PFSVAX::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Wed Mar 31 1993 01:53 | 11 |
| RE: .-2
>through her. We are located in Dayton, OH and send ours to New
>England.....
Can someone explain why Dayton Ohio uses New England and Pittsburgh
Pa. several hundred miles East uses Colorado when both cities are in
the same region?
Phil
|
2374.56 | Worked twice now for me | GANTRY::HULL | Digital Services Delivery - Motown | Thu Apr 01 1993 07:22 | 11 |
| I think the system is working, as long as your local people handling all
the paperwork move it along expeditiously. I recently turned in an expense
report for a business trip where I already had gotten the cc bill for the
airfare (booked it early). I received the email msg saying my deposit was
in 2 days in 8 calendar days from when I handed it to my sec'y. And I work
in the field (Detroit). I had the $ before the cc bill was even overdue.
The quality of the system is very dependant on your local folks sending it
out right away. Complain if they don't!
Al
|
2374.57 | 'Cause we're VG (virtual geography) | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:49 | 10 |
| Re: Note 2374.55 by PFSVAX::MCELWEE
� Can someone explain why Dayton Ohio uses New England and Pittsburgh
� Pa. several hundred miles East uses Colorado when both cities are in
� the same region?
Our unit (as is most of our office) is part of GSG (govt.) which uses
virtual geographies. Our district office is near Hanscom AFB, hence
why our unit uses the NE FMC.
|
2374.58 | Virtual isn't cash on the barrelhead. | PFSVAX::MCELWEE | Opponent of Oppression | Fri Apr 02 1993 02:42 | 20 |
| RE: -.1:
That explains it. Why should distance have anything to do with
expediency of moving paper? The speed of computer networking has
apparently blurred the laws of physics that date back to the Pony
Express.
Another point- I consider the confirmation message that the expense
funds were deposited as "virtual" also. There is no way to
verify the deposit unless you query your account or wait for the
monthly statement.
I support the savings the direct deposit system can provide.
However, I despise the tracking and potential failure details.
IMHO, the best ways to ensure no problems are to keep copies of all
vouchers and receipts, don't use interoffice mail between facilities,
and don't write checks on "virtual dollars".
Phil
|