| Title: | The Digital way of working |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
| Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5321 |
| Total number of notes: | 139771 |
Copyright � Dow Jones & Co. 1991 Source: Dow Jones News Service Headline: *Digital Equipment 1st Qtr Net 23c A Share Vs. 21c Time: OCT 17 1991 0740
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1635.1 | From LIVEWIRE | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | SOAPBOX: more thought, more talk | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:55 | 116 |
As it appears in LIVEWIRE
Digital reports first quarter operating results
For its first quarter, which ended September 28, 1991, Digital reported
total operating revenues of $3,293,085,000, up 6 percent from the
$3,093,370,000 of the comparable quarter a year ago. Net income for the
quarter was $28,580,000, up 9 percent from the $26,177,000 of the comparable
quarter a year ago. Quarterly earnings per share were $.23 versus $.21 last
year.
Jack Smith, senior vice president for Operations, noted, "We are encouraged
by the improved operating results, even in the face of soft economic
conditions around the world. Many companies continue to postpone purchase
of computers while their businesses remain slow. We are particularly pleased
that our service revenues continued to grow at 16 percent year over year and
our desktop integration business maintained its robust growth. In addition,
tight cost controls resulted in essentially flat spending in the quarter.
We are encouraged by substantial progress we've made in the current
restructuring effort."
Ken Olsen, president, said, "Both current and a growing number of new
customers are pleased with our strategy to provide open, distributed
systems that work in their multivendor environments. Digital's strengths in
networking, multivendor integration, and global support are key to the
success of this strategy.
"We intend to compete on the strength of our ability to provide an open
advantage to our customers. Later this month we will introduce and deliver
major new open technologies, open business practices and open services that
will prove it. For years, Digital's VAX systems have been the standard
against which the industry compared itself. With this upcoming
announcement, VAX will jump into a leadership price/performance position
in the industry.
"Digital remains committed to improved revenue growth, profitability and
enhanced shareholder value. To increase revenues, we continue to introduce
new systems, software and services; aggressively market our low-end systems
and peripherals; and expand channels of distribution. In addition, we are
continuing to reduce all portions of our cost structure. At a time when the
industry is faced with rapid and pervasive change, Digital's financial
strength and flexibility allow it to respond to these challenges and
continue to invest for the future."
OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDING:
SEPTEMBER 28, 1991 SEPTEMBER 29, 1990
PRODUCT SALES $ 1,862,849,000 $ 1,865,558,000
SERVICES & OTHER REVENUES 1,430,236,000 1,227,812,000
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 3,293,085,000 3,093,370,000
COST OF PRODUCT SALES 907,835,000 878,015,000
SERVICE EXPENSES 888,292,000 779,708,000
TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,796,127,000 1,657,723,000
RESEARCH & ENGINEERING 408,721,000 401,952,000
SELLING
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 1,051,645,000 1,023,576,000
NET INTEREST (INCOME)/EXPENSE (20,569,000) (24,783,000)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 57,161,000 34,902,000
INCOME TAXES 28,581,000 8,725,000
NET INCOME 28,580,000 26,177,000
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING 126,884,779 123,774,888
NET INCOME PER SHARE $ .23 $ .21
PRODUCT SALES ........................... $ 1,862,849,000
SERVICE AND OTHER REVENUES 1,430,236,000
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES................. 3,293,085,000
COST OF PRODUCT SALES 907,835,000
SERVICE EXPENSE.......................... 888,292,000
TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,796,127,000
GROSS MARGIN 45.5%
RESEARCH & ENGINEERING................... $ 408,721,000
SG&A (SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATION) 1,051,645,000
OPERATING MARGIN 1.1%
INTEREST INCOME.......................... $ (27,098,000)
INTEREST EXPENSE 6,529,000
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES............... 57,161,000
PRE-TAX MARGIN 1.7%
TAXES (TOTAL FEDERAL, STATE AND FOREIGN). 28,581,000
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE 50%
NET INCOME $ 28,580,000
EPS...................................... .23
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING 126,884,779
BALANCE SHEET - Q1 FY92
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS........ $ 2,056,745,000
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (NET) 3,175,614,000
(RE: A.R. DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING) 87 DAYS
INVENTORIES: RAW MATERIALS.........333,138,000
WORK IN PROCESS.......548,641,000
FINISHED GOODS........820,934,000
TOTAL.............. $ 1,702,713,000
PREPAID EXPENSES......................... 417,088,000
DEFERRED INCOME TAX CHARGES, NET 430,200,000
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 7,782,360,000
NET PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT.......... 3,708,081,000
TOTAL ASSETS 11,940,994,000
SHORT TERM DEBT (CURRENT PORTION OF LTD). 21,776,000
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES................ 4,101,245,000
DEFERRED TAX CREDITS NET 17,000,000
LONG TERM DEBT........................... 146,057,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES........................ 4,264,302,000
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY 7,676,692,000
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE..................... 61.37
CAPITAL SPENDING (ADDITION TO PP&E) 136,161,000
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION.............. 200,659,000
NON U.S. REVENUES 2,045,214,000
or 62%
TOTAL EMPLOYEE POPULATION APPROXIMATELY 115,300
| |||||
| 1635.2 | Encouraging. But... | HAAG::HAAG | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:51 | 11 | |
Encouraging considering recent bombshells by such noteables as IBM with
their 80+ decrease in quarterly profits. We still have a long way to
go. I still can't help but believe this almost fanatical obsession with
quarterly results hurts DEC and all of corporate America. It smacks of
greed. One recent article in Business Week (of all places) discussed
the question: "Does Wall Street Really Matter All That Much Anymore?".
The article exlpored compeititiveness from a global, long range
perspective. In that scenerio what DEC did relative to IBM this quarter
has little or no meaning.
Gene.
| |||||
| 1635.3 | very narrow minded | SOLVIT::BUCZYNSKI | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:54 | 4 | |
re-.1
Wall Street cannot see or think beyond 4:00PM on a daily basis!
Mike
| |||||
| 1635.4 | Always a winner... | QBUS::M_PARISE | Network Partner Excited... | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:44 | 8 |
Hmmm ...
Curious how the only one who really profited from our cost cutting
measures as reflected by the gain in Net Income Before Taxes.....
... was SAM.
/Mike
| |||||
| 1635.5 | Good, but not so good | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:56 | 9 |
Good news, but miles away from where we want to be. Profits are
only .8%, which is basically miserable. Means that services are still
supporting the product business almost entirely.
I'd like to believe that we are ignoring the short term syndrome, but
every message I see, in the TSNG world anyway, is ship as early as
possible, maximize short-term revenue, long term penalties be damned.
| |||||
| 1635.6 | Not the stock, not the stock... | GIAMEM::MUMFORD | Dick Mumford, DTN 244-7809 | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:20 | 2 |
In light of these OK results, why would the stock be trading DOWN
almost 2 points this afternoon?
| |||||
| 1635.7 | Not OK | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Oct 17 1991 15:30 | 4 |
Because these results are not "OK". From a Wall Street perspective
they're not seeing the results of lay-offs, reorgs, etc., yet....except
in the sense of continuing poor morale, poor numbers and management
confusion.
| |||||
| 1635.8 | SA1794::CHARBONND | Dances With Squirrels | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:04 | 2 | |
maybe because the market as a whole is backing off from yesterday's
record high?
| |||||
| 1635.9 | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:25 | 8 | |
I've noticed that: 1. When Digital does well, the stock goes down. 2. When Digital does poorly, the stock goes down. The stock only seems to go up when the right random numbers appear. Steve | |||||
| 1635.10 | GOOD? OK? HUH? | NYEM1::GRAY | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:32 | 21 | |
Look at the numbers and the story is clear.
Product Sales are flat (for all intent & purpose) as they have been for
several quarters. Yet, cost of product sales continue to grow through the
same period. Selling/G&A expense also remains high. All this in spite
of the efforts to cut costs (Employee population down to 115,300 vs.
123,500 one year ago.) How can these expense items continue to grow
when we have let 8,000 people go, and closed many facilities?
It appears to me that there is a major expense hole somewhere in there
that hasn't been found, let alone patched. I am not trying to make a
case for not reducing headcount further but it don't seem to be
working. The next cut better nail the free spenders. We seem to be getting
nowhere fast. Maybe, *JUST MAYBE*, the secret lies in WHO gets cut vs.
how many get cut.
I'm sure that many people in the investment community share some of
these feelings.
Just some wild rambling.
| |||||
| 1635.11 | LABRYS::CONNELLY | Television must be destroyed! | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:33 | 4 | |
It was up over 60 at mid-day...i assume that triggered some programmed selling. paul | |||||
| 1635.12 | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Kids are our Future-Teach 'em Well | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:34 | 5 | |
Paul's probably right. The volume grew after Noontime. As of 3:00 we
were around 1 million shares traded.
| |||||
| 1635.13 | STOCK PRICES = INVESTOR CONFIDENCE | SWAM2::KELLER_FR | Thu Oct 17 1991 21:55 | 24 | |
A stocks price at any moment reflects investor confidence in the
future price of the stock. IBM's stock had already been discounted by
the market long before their actual results were reported, and as the
results matched IBM's earlier statements, investor confidence in the
future price increased and their price went up. If results had been
worse than expected, the price would have gone down.
The market is still uncertain about the future price of Digital's stock
and fears it could go even lower. Confidence will increase when we
continue to accurately forecast our results and show that we're
continuing to reduce our costs to produce more operating profits.
Increased confidence will keep our stock from dropping even more and
may even make it go up somewhat. That coupled with business indicators
showing a turnaround in our Industry will make our stock prices go up
even more.
So we can expect continuing measures to reduce costs even more (watch
IBM as they announce even more cutbacks) and an emphasis on increasing
sales of all products and services to signal an Industry turnaround.
The Oct. 30 announcements are critical to this process and our (Sales)
response to them is critical in keeping the reductions to other parts
of the Company....! We're past the fat into the muscle, and the organs
will be next. We can't let that happen.
| |||||
| 1635.14 | IMHO | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Fri Oct 18 1991 07:01 | 18 |
My theory:
The stock was especially low due to stories of an abysmal quarter.
As the quarter ended, the stock edged upward on rumours that maybe
the news was better than expected.
After the results were released, the excitement was over, and
the speculators took their profits and left.
There is frequently a pattern of a stock moving up or down in
anticipation of good or bad news, then returning to its original
value after the news breaks.
-al
| |||||
| 1635.15 | Human behavior is quaint | BUZON::BELDIN_R | Pull us together, not apart | Fri Oct 18 1991 07:37 | 6 |
Predicting stock prices is like predicting human behavior, not what you
would call an exact science. About the only way you can generate
enthusiasm is to put some money down. Then, all of a sudden, you are so
involved its hard to remain objective. :-)
Dick
| |||||
| 1635.16 | Buy on rumor, Sell on news | SOLVIT::COBB | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:10 | 25 | |
There's an old stock market addage that says "Buy on rumor,
sell on news"....what that basically means is that the people
who track stocks very closely and are astute about picking
up clues and whatever information they can get from various
sources already know (or have a pretty good idea) before an
event happens of what's going to happen. When it does come
about as expected, they take their profits and get out.
Those are typically the high volume traders and it has a big
impact on the market...the little guys like us who don't have
time to really tap into all the information that's needed to
predict trends typically have to wait until the news comes
out and by then its too late because the market has already
"discounted" the news.
The investment community is regularly briefed by Digital and
prepped as to what to expect so that there won't be any big
surprises when the news actually comes out. I don't know
how their expectations were set this time around, but I suspect
that the $3 drop in price could also reflect a difference between
how their expectations were set and what actually came out.
Chuck
| |||||
| 1635.17 | TPS::BUTCHART | TP Systems Performance | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:15 | 8 | |
According to an article in the Boston Globe today, one reason for the drop in the our stock price was that as part of the announcement Jack Smith also stated that the outlook for the next couple of quarters was pretty gloomy. That, along with the analysis that the hardware part of our business had, at best, broken even, pretty effectively squelched any potential euphoria in the financial markets. /Dave | |||||
| 1635.18 | cost containment?? | NOVA::SIMON | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:40 | 6 | |
.10 brings up some good points. *Why* are costs still relatively high
in light of plant closures, layoffs, travel restrictions,....?? These
containment measures have been going on for nearly 3 years to some
extent.
| |||||
| 1635.19 | VERGA::FACHON | Fri Oct 18 1991 10:52 | 15 | ||
I'm willing to bet the stock will trend up for the next
several quarters. In fact, I did bet; I borrowed money
to pick up some shares.
Historicly, DEC pulls out of the duldrums before IBM, and I
expect a similar pattern this time around. DEC is in an excellent
postition. To post gains in this climate, while we're
reorganizing, is *outstanding* performance. And the growth in service
revenues is a *very* good sign when product margins are almost
non-existent.
18 months from now, KO will be a Wall Street darling again...
IMHO,
Dean F.
| |||||
| 1635.20 | List? What list? | CSCOA1::PARISE_M | deliaF egamI rorriM | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:20 | 5 |
Maybe because while the Titanic is sinking, the band is still playing
in the main ballroom, oblivious to the shouting and commotion.
/Mike
| |||||
| 1635.21 | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:24 | 2 | |
re -2 ....... that is IF KO is here 18 months from now. I would
give slightly better than even odds he will be fishing in Maine.
| |||||
| 1635.22 | VCSESU::MOSHER::COOK | Uncongressional Mosh! | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:01 | 2 | |
Unbelievable.
| |||||
| 1635.23 | Woe, woe,thrice woe! | VOGON::KAPPLER | but I manage ... | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:42 | 6 |
.9 forgot the additional two rules:
3 When IBM does well, Digital stock goes down
4 When IBM does badly, Digital stock goes down
JK
| |||||
| 1635.24 | SAHQ::LUBER | HOME OF 1991 NL CHAMP ATLANTA BRAVES!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:29 | 3 | |
re. 19
Can I please have some of what you're smoking?
| |||||
| 1635.25 | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:13 | 4 | |
re .24: He's just being contrarian, which has historically been a good thing for an investor to be. | |||||