Title: | The Digital way of working |
Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 5321 |
Total number of notes: | 139771 |
Copyright � Dow Jones & Co. 1991 Source: Dow Jones News Service Headline: *Digital Equipment 1st Qtr Net 23c A Share Vs. 21c Time: OCT 17 1991 0740
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1635.1 | From LIVEWIRE | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | SOAPBOX: more thought, more talk | Thu Oct 17 1991 10:55 | 116 |
As it appears in LIVEWIRE Digital reports first quarter operating results For its first quarter, which ended September 28, 1991, Digital reported total operating revenues of $3,293,085,000, up 6 percent from the $3,093,370,000 of the comparable quarter a year ago. Net income for the quarter was $28,580,000, up 9 percent from the $26,177,000 of the comparable quarter a year ago. Quarterly earnings per share were $.23 versus $.21 last year. Jack Smith, senior vice president for Operations, noted, "We are encouraged by the improved operating results, even in the face of soft economic conditions around the world. Many companies continue to postpone purchase of computers while their businesses remain slow. We are particularly pleased that our service revenues continued to grow at 16 percent year over year and our desktop integration business maintained its robust growth. In addition, tight cost controls resulted in essentially flat spending in the quarter. We are encouraged by substantial progress we've made in the current restructuring effort." Ken Olsen, president, said, "Both current and a growing number of new customers are pleased with our strategy to provide open, distributed systems that work in their multivendor environments. Digital's strengths in networking, multivendor integration, and global support are key to the success of this strategy. "We intend to compete on the strength of our ability to provide an open advantage to our customers. Later this month we will introduce and deliver major new open technologies, open business practices and open services that will prove it. For years, Digital's VAX systems have been the standard against which the industry compared itself. With this upcoming announcement, VAX will jump into a leadership price/performance position in the industry. "Digital remains committed to improved revenue growth, profitability and enhanced shareholder value. To increase revenues, we continue to introduce new systems, software and services; aggressively market our low-end systems and peripherals; and expand channels of distribution. In addition, we are continuing to reduce all portions of our cost structure. At a time when the industry is faced with rapid and pervasive change, Digital's financial strength and flexibility allow it to respond to these challenges and continue to invest for the future." OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDING: SEPTEMBER 28, 1991 SEPTEMBER 29, 1990 PRODUCT SALES $ 1,862,849,000 $ 1,865,558,000 SERVICES & OTHER REVENUES 1,430,236,000 1,227,812,000 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 3,293,085,000 3,093,370,000 COST OF PRODUCT SALES 907,835,000 878,015,000 SERVICE EXPENSES 888,292,000 779,708,000 TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,796,127,000 1,657,723,000 RESEARCH & ENGINEERING 408,721,000 401,952,000 SELLING GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 1,051,645,000 1,023,576,000 NET INTEREST (INCOME)/EXPENSE (20,569,000) (24,783,000) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 57,161,000 34,902,000 INCOME TAXES 28,581,000 8,725,000 NET INCOME 28,580,000 26,177,000 AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING 126,884,779 123,774,888 NET INCOME PER SHARE $ .23 $ .21 PRODUCT SALES ........................... $ 1,862,849,000 SERVICE AND OTHER REVENUES 1,430,236,000 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES................. 3,293,085,000 COST OF PRODUCT SALES 907,835,000 SERVICE EXPENSE.......................... 888,292,000 TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,796,127,000 GROSS MARGIN 45.5% RESEARCH & ENGINEERING................... $ 408,721,000 SG&A (SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATION) 1,051,645,000 OPERATING MARGIN 1.1% INTEREST INCOME.......................... $ (27,098,000) INTEREST EXPENSE 6,529,000 INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES............... 57,161,000 PRE-TAX MARGIN 1.7% TAXES (TOTAL FEDERAL, STATE AND FOREIGN). 28,581,000 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE 50% NET INCOME $ 28,580,000 EPS...................................... .23 AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING 126,884,779 BALANCE SHEET - Q1 FY92 CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS........ $ 2,056,745,000 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (NET) 3,175,614,000 (RE: A.R. DAYS SALES OUTSTANDING) 87 DAYS INVENTORIES: RAW MATERIALS.........333,138,000 WORK IN PROCESS.......548,641,000 FINISHED GOODS........820,934,000 TOTAL.............. $ 1,702,713,000 PREPAID EXPENSES......................... 417,088,000 DEFERRED INCOME TAX CHARGES, NET 430,200,000 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 7,782,360,000 NET PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT.......... 3,708,081,000 TOTAL ASSETS 11,940,994,000 SHORT TERM DEBT (CURRENT PORTION OF LTD). 21,776,000 TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES................ 4,101,245,000 DEFERRED TAX CREDITS NET 17,000,000 LONG TERM DEBT........................... 146,057,000 TOTAL LIABILITIES........................ 4,264,302,000 STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY 7,676,692,000 BOOK VALUE PER SHARE..................... 61.37 CAPITAL SPENDING (ADDITION TO PP&E) 136,161,000 DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION.............. 200,659,000 NON U.S. REVENUES 2,045,214,000 or 62% TOTAL EMPLOYEE POPULATION APPROXIMATELY 115,300 | |||||
1635.2 | Encouraging. But... | HAAG::HAAG | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:51 | 11 | |
Encouraging considering recent bombshells by such noteables as IBM with their 80+ decrease in quarterly profits. We still have a long way to go. I still can't help but believe this almost fanatical obsession with quarterly results hurts DEC and all of corporate America. It smacks of greed. One recent article in Business Week (of all places) discussed the question: "Does Wall Street Really Matter All That Much Anymore?". The article exlpored compeititiveness from a global, long range perspective. In that scenerio what DEC did relative to IBM this quarter has little or no meaning. Gene. | |||||
1635.3 | very narrow minded | SOLVIT::BUCZYNSKI | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:54 | 4 | |
re-.1 Wall Street cannot see or think beyond 4:00PM on a daily basis! Mike | |||||
1635.4 | Always a winner... | QBUS::M_PARISE | Network Partner Excited... | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:44 | 8 |
Hmmm ... Curious how the only one who really profited from our cost cutting measures as reflected by the gain in Net Income Before Taxes..... ... was SAM. /Mike | |||||
1635.5 | Good, but not so good | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:56 | 9 |
Good news, but miles away from where we want to be. Profits are only .8%, which is basically miserable. Means that services are still supporting the product business almost entirely. I'd like to believe that we are ignoring the short term syndrome, but every message I see, in the TSNG world anyway, is ship as early as possible, maximize short-term revenue, long term penalties be damned. | |||||
1635.6 | Not the stock, not the stock... | GIAMEM::MUMFORD | Dick Mumford, DTN 244-7809 | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:20 | 2 |
In light of these OK results, why would the stock be trading DOWN almost 2 points this afternoon? | |||||
1635.7 | Not OK | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:30 | 4 |
Because these results are not "OK". From a Wall Street perspective they're not seeing the results of lay-offs, reorgs, etc., yet....except in the sense of continuing poor morale, poor numbers and management confusion. | |||||
1635.8 | SA1794::CHARBONND | Dances With Squirrels | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:04 | 2 | |
maybe because the market as a whole is backing off from yesterday's record high? | |||||
1635.9 | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:25 | 8 | |
I've noticed that: 1. When Digital does well, the stock goes down. 2. When Digital does poorly, the stock goes down. The stock only seems to go up when the right random numbers appear. Steve | |||||
1635.10 | GOOD? OK? HUH? | NYEM1::GRAY | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:32 | 21 | |
Look at the numbers and the story is clear. Product Sales are flat (for all intent & purpose) as they have been for several quarters. Yet, cost of product sales continue to grow through the same period. Selling/G&A expense also remains high. All this in spite of the efforts to cut costs (Employee population down to 115,300 vs. 123,500 one year ago.) How can these expense items continue to grow when we have let 8,000 people go, and closed many facilities? It appears to me that there is a major expense hole somewhere in there that hasn't been found, let alone patched. I am not trying to make a case for not reducing headcount further but it don't seem to be working. The next cut better nail the free spenders. We seem to be getting nowhere fast. Maybe, *JUST MAYBE*, the secret lies in WHO gets cut vs. how many get cut. I'm sure that many people in the investment community share some of these feelings. Just some wild rambling. | |||||
1635.11 | LABRYS::CONNELLY | Television must be destroyed! | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:33 | 4 | |
It was up over 60 at mid-day...i assume that triggered some programmed selling. paul | |||||
1635.12 | FSDEV::MGILBERT | Kids are our Future-Teach 'em Well | Thu Oct 17 1991 17:34 | 5 | |
Paul's probably right. The volume grew after Noontime. As of 3:00 we were around 1 million shares traded. | |||||
1635.13 | STOCK PRICES = INVESTOR CONFIDENCE | SWAM2::KELLER_FR | Thu Oct 17 1991 22:55 | 24 | |
A stocks price at any moment reflects investor confidence in the future price of the stock. IBM's stock had already been discounted by the market long before their actual results were reported, and as the results matched IBM's earlier statements, investor confidence in the future price increased and their price went up. If results had been worse than expected, the price would have gone down. The market is still uncertain about the future price of Digital's stock and fears it could go even lower. Confidence will increase when we continue to accurately forecast our results and show that we're continuing to reduce our costs to produce more operating profits. Increased confidence will keep our stock from dropping even more and may even make it go up somewhat. That coupled with business indicators showing a turnaround in our Industry will make our stock prices go up even more. So we can expect continuing measures to reduce costs even more (watch IBM as they announce even more cutbacks) and an emphasis on increasing sales of all products and services to signal an Industry turnaround. The Oct. 30 announcements are critical to this process and our (Sales) response to them is critical in keeping the reductions to other parts of the Company....! We're past the fat into the muscle, and the organs will be next. We can't let that happen. | |||||
1635.14 | IMHO | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:01 | 18 |
My theory: The stock was especially low due to stories of an abysmal quarter. As the quarter ended, the stock edged upward on rumours that maybe the news was better than expected. After the results were released, the excitement was over, and the speculators took their profits and left. There is frequently a pattern of a stock moving up or down in anticipation of good or bad news, then returning to its original value after the news breaks. -al | |||||
1635.15 | Human behavior is quaint | BUZON::BELDIN_R | Pull us together, not apart | Fri Oct 18 1991 08:37 | 6 |
Predicting stock prices is like predicting human behavior, not what you would call an exact science. About the only way you can generate enthusiasm is to put some money down. Then, all of a sudden, you are so involved its hard to remain objective. :-) Dick | |||||
1635.16 | Buy on rumor, Sell on news | SOLVIT::COBB | Fri Oct 18 1991 09:10 | 25 | |
There's an old stock market addage that says "Buy on rumor, sell on news"....what that basically means is that the people who track stocks very closely and are astute about picking up clues and whatever information they can get from various sources already know (or have a pretty good idea) before an event happens of what's going to happen. When it does come about as expected, they take their profits and get out. Those are typically the high volume traders and it has a big impact on the market...the little guys like us who don't have time to really tap into all the information that's needed to predict trends typically have to wait until the news comes out and by then its too late because the market has already "discounted" the news. The investment community is regularly briefed by Digital and prepped as to what to expect so that there won't be any big surprises when the news actually comes out. I don't know how their expectations were set this time around, but I suspect that the $3 drop in price could also reflect a difference between how their expectations were set and what actually came out. Chuck | |||||
1635.17 | TPS::BUTCHART | TP Systems Performance | Fri Oct 18 1991 09:15 | 8 | |
According to an article in the Boston Globe today, one reason for the drop in the our stock price was that as part of the announcement Jack Smith also stated that the outlook for the next couple of quarters was pretty gloomy. That, along with the analysis that the hardware part of our business had, at best, broken even, pretty effectively squelched any potential euphoria in the financial markets. /Dave | |||||
1635.18 | cost containment?? | NOVA::SIMON | Fri Oct 18 1991 09:40 | 6 | |
.10 brings up some good points. *Why* are costs still relatively high in light of plant closures, layoffs, travel restrictions,....?? These containment measures have been going on for nearly 3 years to some extent. | |||||
1635.19 | VERGA::FACHON | Fri Oct 18 1991 11:52 | 15 | ||
I'm willing to bet the stock will trend up for the next several quarters. In fact, I did bet; I borrowed money to pick up some shares. Historicly, DEC pulls out of the duldrums before IBM, and I expect a similar pattern this time around. DEC is in an excellent postition. To post gains in this climate, while we're reorganizing, is *outstanding* performance. And the growth in service revenues is a *very* good sign when product margins are almost non-existent. 18 months from now, KO will be a Wall Street darling again... IMHO, Dean F. | |||||
1635.20 | List? What list? | CSCOA1::PARISE_M | deliaF egamI rorriM | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:20 | 5 |
Maybe because while the Titanic is sinking, the band is still playing in the main ballroom, oblivious to the shouting and commotion. /Mike | |||||
1635.21 | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Fri Oct 18 1991 12:24 | 2 | |
re -2 ....... that is IF KO is here 18 months from now. I would give slightly better than even odds he will be fishing in Maine. | |||||
1635.22 | VCSESU::MOSHER::COOK | Uncongressional Mosh! | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:01 | 2 | |
Unbelievable. | |||||
1635.23 | Woe, woe,thrice woe! | VOGON::KAPPLER | but I manage ... | Fri Oct 18 1991 13:42 | 6 |
.9 forgot the additional two rules: 3 When IBM does well, Digital stock goes down 4 When IBM does badly, Digital stock goes down JK | |||||
1635.24 | SAHQ::LUBER | HOME OF 1991 NL CHAMP ATLANTA BRAVES!! | Fri Oct 18 1991 14:29 | 3 | |
re. 19 Can I please have some of what you're smoking? | |||||
1635.25 | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Oct 18 1991 15:13 | 4 | |
re .24: He's just being contrarian, which has historically been a good thing for an investor to be. |