T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1513.1 | | RANGER::MINOW | The best lack all conviction, while the worst | Fri Jun 28 1991 15:23 | 14 |
| > Are they better than us?
This is not necessarily a question you want to have answered.
European travel may well be governed by workers' council decisions.
For example, someone pointed out that "5-day courses" start Monday
afternoon and end Friday morning so the attendees can travel during
business hours.
Also, European air travel may have a completely different mix of
"business class" vs "tourist class," making the cheaper seats
essentially inaccessible to business travellers.
Martin.
|
1513.2 | There may be some advance purchase fares not requiring a Saturday stay | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jun 28 1991 16:30 | 7 |
| Apparently the deal with Lufthansa in the Munich-Nice market is that you can
only by an Economy ticket if you plan to stay over Saturday night.
Otherwise, they will sell you only a Business Class ticket at more than
double the price.
/john
|
1513.3 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Yes, I see ++ | Fri Jun 28 1991 19:09 | 18 |
| re .1:
>For example, someone pointed out that "5-day courses" start Monday
>afternoon and end Friday morning so the attendees can travel during
>business hours.
I don't know if this is the rule for all European training centers.
Munich recently started doing this - definitely not because of any
workers' council decisions, but as a cost saving measure. The idea
behind it is that European participants can catch the course using
Monday morning flights, and save a night in the hotel. The only country
where the workers' council would have enough power to influence this
directly is Germany itself, and German students have always been able
to arrive in time without an extra might even for a 9:30 starting time.
This all applies to in-house studens; customer courses (which are in
German anyway) start around 10 if I remember correctly.
|
1513.4 | Hands up who has flown Business Class in Europe! | SMAUG::GUNN | I couldn't possibly comment | Fri Jun 28 1991 19:35 | 26 |
| In case any non-European based folk think that our European colleagues
might be travelling in the lap of luxury while the rest of us are being
laid off/transitioned/downsized, inter-country Business Class in Europe
is by no means the same as intercontinental Business Class. On the
airlines I have flown in Europe, the individual seat/space (or lack of
it) is the same as in Tourist/Economy/Steerage. The service is no
better, the food (if any) is slighlty better and you get a free
newspaper.
On one of my trips on British Airways I asked a stewardess how they set
up the proportion of Business Class to other seats on any one flight
since it appeared that the seats themselves were the same. She
confirmed my assumption of identical seats and told me that the cabin
partion between classes was movable and was moved between flights
depending on how many of each kind of passenger were booked on the
flight.
On some flight I found that Steerage was less crowded than Business
Class and I was thus more comfortable in the back of the plane than up
front with all those folk on generous expense accounts.
N.B."Steerage" was the description used by shipping lines for the
section in some passenger ships with the poorest accommodations
occupied by the passengers paying the lowest fare. This section was
generally located near the ship's steering mechanism, hence its name.
It is also an apt description of most airline accommodation.
|
1513.5 | Security, hassle, congestion ...... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Sat Jun 29 1991 05:30 | 25 |
|
"Europe" doesn't fly business class. Some individual country
subsidiaries do. Others do not.
The principal difference is in ease of ticket change. On economy
tickets, they often offer low fares by restrictions on ticket changes.
Seating, leg space is identical on most airlines for Economy & Business.
Slightly better food is offered in Business Class.
The subsidiary that hosts me only books Apex tickets if they can. My
last 14 business trips into mainland Europe were booked Apex. 11 had
re-scheduling requirements due to customer schedule changes etc. All of
those had tickets were endorsed "No change or reservations". Had to
stand in line & negotiate re-scheduling for the lowest price I could
bargain. On several occasions, was left at destination for several
unusable hours waiting to get back. BTW, the cost of Apex + rebooking
fee is frequently higher than booking appropriately originally -- even
without allowing for the lost time & aggravation. (Last week I was
quoted $170 to rebook on a 1hr return flight from Brussels to London
-- in Economy).
Travelling around Europe by air as a regular (eg weekly) business
practice is uncomfortable & unpleasant -- regardless of travel class.
It's necessary, & part of my job -- but let's not be mis-led by the base
note.
|
1513.6 | Europe = AU,CH,DK,...FR,GY,...UK | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Mon Jul 01 1991 08:23 | 33 |
| I am able to confirm that NOONE in my (Euro)Costcenter travels
Business class neither within Europe nor Transatlantic.
There never has been a policy allowing you to travel Business
within Europe anyway, only transatlantic.
There has been (still is ?) abuse and there have been and still
are and will be exceptions for valid reasons.
Allow me step on the soapbox:
1- It might be good to have policies to reduce cost.
2- They are FAR from ADEQUATE to actually accomplish anything
without MOTIVATION.
3- I don't (nor do my people) need to be told that we got to get
the costs down. By now, everyone knows.
4- I hate to be dictated every detail of implementation.
5- I love to see INITIATIVES (from "above" as well as from "below")
to really accomplish savings.
down from the soapbox.
Within the context of Europe, one has to realize that there is no
such entity (in terms of $$$$ ) as DIGITAL Europe. Every country
is it's own profit and loss subsidiary, which eventually may evolve
into regional or account profit and loss "Entreprises"..
Therefore, travelling "Business" in one country (Entreprise) and not
in the other, should be the entrepreneur's decision.
(if she/he can proof that it generates profit, why not ?)
/fred
other is and should be
|
1513.7 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Yes, I see ++ | Mon Jul 01 1991 12:29 | 24 |
| Well, I've never yet *not* flown anything else than business class in
Europe (though I haven't traveled too much lately).
I have never specifically asked for business class, either.
But, on the other hand, because of this discussion, I checked a couple
of my recent flights and noticed that there were no cheaper tariffs
which would not have included conditions like a minimum stay etc. that
would have been possible.
In fact, I have the impression that to get a ticket without
rebooking/cancelation etc. restrictions, you'll end up paying business
class in many (most?) cases. Maybe someone who's more up-to-date on the
situiation in Europe can comment.
The policy here in Germany (I have a hardcopy, it's not available on
VTX) says in section 4.3, page 4:
"Standardm��ig wird bei Fl�gen Business Class und bei Bahnreisen 1.
Klasse einschlie�lich Zuschl�ge (z.B. IC-Zuschlag) gebucht. Nach
M�glichkeit sind verg�nstigungen wie Flieg & Spar Tarife oder �hnliches
zu nutzen."
|
1513.8 | This can of worms gets uglier by the minute! | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Jul 01 1991 14:09 | 17 |
| Ora, who is the person who originally asked me about the business class policy,
asked me to translate the last paragraph of his reply .7:
> "Standardm��ig wird bei Fl�gen Business Class und bei Bahnreisen 1.
> Klasse einschlie�lich Zuschl�ge (z.B. IC-Zuschlag) gebucht. Nach
> M�glichkeit sind verg�nstigungen wie Flieg & Spar Tarife oder �hnliches
> zu nutzen."
In accordance with standard procedures, Business Class flights and First Class
rail, including supplements (e.g. InterCity supplement), will be reserved.
When possible, fare reductions such as the "Fly and Save Tariff" or similar
reductions are to be used.
First Class rail within Germany except on E-, P-, or N- trains or when
seat reservations cannot be made (24 hours in advance) is totally unjustified!
/john
|
1513.9 | Get the facts. | STRIKR::LINDLEY | Strewth mate..... | Tue Jul 02 1991 07:48 | 22 |
| Here in the UK everyone flies economy class to European destinations,
and always have. We used to be able to travel Business class to the
US, but not anymore.
Business class tickets are only booked for flights longer than 8 hours.
As for Germany, my understanding is that travel conditions for
employees are negotiated at a national level between workers councils
and employers. This means that Digital are unable to dictate "lower"
class travel than that which has been bindingly agreed to at national
level.
Here in "Europe", which as a previous noter has pointed out does not
exist as a Digital entity, we're all busting a gut so save money
wherever possible. We have an effective 1 year Salary freeze in the
UK. Nobody needs to tell us not to spend money unnecessarily.
Lets get our facts straight before we start criticising others for
waste!
John
|
1513.10 | or just your understanding? | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Jul 02 1991 08:25 | 5 |
| >Lets get our facts straight...
OK, are you sure that the Betriebsrat is involved in travel policy decisions?
Is that a fact?
|
1513.11 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Yes, I see ++ | Tue Jul 02 1991 09:39 | 94 |
| re .9:
�As for Germany, my understanding is that travel conditions for
�employees are negotiated at a national level between workers councils
�and employers. This means that Digital are unable to dictate "lower"
�class travel than that which has been bindingly agreed to at national
�level.
This is BS - the workers' council (Betriebsrat) has no say in this.
They do have a bit more power maybe than in many other countries, but
it seems to get exaggerated...
As to economy vs. business, I just checked a few more typical (for DEC
Munich) routes in OAG - for all practical purposes, there seems to be
no such thing as economy on European flights anymore - i.e. if you want
to have a flight without limitations (cancelation fees, fixed bookings,
minimum stay etc.) its business class.
Note that I'm not saying these fares shouldn't be used - but in
practice, they are often only useful for training trips which tend to
last a bit longer (at least a week) and have a lower probability of
being canceled/changed that 'real' business trips (which in my
experience are 1-2 days and frequently are changed in the last minute).
Just as an example, look the routes Munich-Frankfurt and Munich-London
(LHR, there are other conditions to Gatwick and Stansted if these can
be used). As you can see, there's no such thing as a 'normal' economy
fare to Frankfurt, just either business or special prices for economy
(fare codes staring with a Y). For LHR, the economy price code Y
without any limitations is exactly the sabe as C and actually moot.
==========================PREFERENCE STATUS: ALL==============================
Fares selected for: MUC-FRA Departs: TUE-02 JUL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fares: WEST GERMAN MARK Fare Restriction Summary:
# One-way Rnd-trp Airline/ Farecode Cancel Advance Min.
No lower fares Class Penalty Purchase Stay Other
1 229 LH YAP3M : 100* 7 day - -
2 324 LH YPX3M : 100* - - -
3 249 LH C : * * * *
4 349 LH F : * * * *
No higher fares * Additional Restrictions apply
===============================================================================
LIMITATIONS DISPLAY TUE-02 JUL
MUC-FRA FARECODE:YAP3M
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES
FARE DESCRIPTION: ECONOMY CLASS FARES
PURCHASE TICKET FOR TRAVEL NO LATER
THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE DEPARTURE.
THE PENALTY FOR CANCELLING YOUR TRAVEL
IS 100 DEM.
* END OF LIMITATIONS DISPLAY *
LIMITATIONS DISPLAY TUE-02 JUL
MUC-FRA FARECODE:YPX3M
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES
FARE DESCRIPTION: ECONOMY CLASS FARES
THE PENALTY FOR CANCELLING YOUR TRAVEL
IS 100 DEM.
* END OF LIMITATIONS DISPLAY *
==========================PREFERENCE STATUS: ALL==============================
Fares selected for: MUC-LHR Departs: TUE-02 JUL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fares: WEST GERMAN MARK Fare Restriction Summary:
# One-way Rnd-trp Airline/ Farecode Cancel Advance Min.
No lower fares Class Penalty Purchase Stay Other
1 524 GEN YAP3M : * 7 day Sat. *
2 760 GEN YPX6M : 100* - Sat. *
3 1215 GEN YB : 20% - - -
4 1307 GEN C : - - - -
5 1307 GEN Y : - - - -
6 1307 BA C : - - - -
7 660 GEN YB : 20% - - -
8 710 GEN C : - - - -
* Additional Restrictions apply
===============================================================================
LIMITATIONS DISPLAY TUE-02 JUL
MUC-LON FARECODE:YAP3M
GENERAL FARES
FARE DESCRIPTION: ECONOMY CLASS FARES
MINIMUM STAY IS OVERNIGHT ON SATURDAY.
MAXIMUM STAY ALLOWED IS 3 MONTHS.
PURCHASE TICKET FOR TRAVEL NO LATER
THAN 7 DAYS BEFORE DEPARTURE.
THE PENALTY FOR CANCELLING YOUR TRAVEL
MORE THAN 1 DAY BEFORE YOUR DEPARTURE
IS 100 DEM.
|
1513.12 | U.K. is not Europe" | UKCSSE::BUDD | I'd rather be turning | Wed Jul 03 1991 06:02 | 24 |
| From the U.K. flights are normally booked as "Euro Budget", this
equates to economy class in most cases and the key "restriction" is
no change of flight.
This is not a hard restriction as I have often needed to change my
return flight due to a change of schedule and the cost is minimal for
inter European flights, typically �20-23.
As somebody else has already pointed out, "Economy" seats are in the
minority on many routes.
On a recent Lufthansa 737 flight from London-Dusseldorf there were 3
rows of First Class, 10 rows Business Class and 5 rows Economy.
On the return British Airways 737 flight, there were only 2 rows of
Economy seats, the rest were Business Class. This made for a very
unpleasant fight with smokers immediately in front and behind.
I was also surprised when I met my U.S DEC colleagues at the hotel,
they were driving group D rental cars, whereas the U.K. has to hire
group A.
Martin.
|
1513.13 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Jul 03 1991 11:51 | 3 |
| >they were driving group D rental cars
Hopefully they were paying for Group B, because that's all that's authorized.
|
1513.14 | Europe is flying what is available | PAVONE::MUGGIA | Chi comanda avvelena anche te | Tue Jul 09 1991 04:28 | 31 |
|
It seems that the Eurobusiness class (full fare) is the default unless you do
stay over the weekend. For sure it is the standard fare if you want the
flexibility of changing the flights, which usually is not necessary unless one
thinks to be a VIP.
If you are a single, you could take the opportunity of spending the Saturday and
Sunday visting interesting places and let the company save money, provided that
you pay a couple of extra nights at the hotel. But when you have a family this
is sometimes impossible to do...
Also, on domestic flights (at least in Italy, but I think in other countries
too) the business class is not available. But the only way of getting a better
fare is:
- honey moon (not always)
- some group trips organized by travel agencies
- family tickect if you are traveling with kids
- elections (this is a typical italian case)
- some strange nightly flights, which brings you to destination after the latest
bus to the city has left the airport, so that you need a taxi and pay an extra
for the late hour...
As for flights to US, the site manager here in Varese decided in 1989 (before
the travel restriction were enforced) to fly economy, using all the possible
benefits: Apex, Superpex, Excursion tickets, depending on the duration of the
trip. And we use special tickets (formula like "Visit USA": 3 tickets for 300$)
if we need to fly within US. The availability of such fares on intercontinental
flights lead to the absurd situation that sometimes a trip from Milan to Boston
is cheaper that a trip from Milan to London.
It is true that sometimes we could get even better opportunities just changing
airline. But, please, I demand at least the rights of choosing the sirline, if I
feel safer on Swissair that PanAm...
|
1513.15 | | BSS::D_BANKS | David Banks -- N�ION | Wed Jul 10 1991 10:45 | 12 |
| Re: <<< Note 1513.13 by COVERT::COVERT "John R. Covert" >>>
>>they were driving group D rental cars
>
>Hopefully they were paying for Group B, because that's all that's authorized.
What they were paying is irrelevant as long as they were only *claiming* the
lower fare on their expenses. When I travelled frequently, I would *always*
rent a larger car because of my leg length (will not fit in a compact car :-)
but would always pay the difference myself.
- David
|
1513.16 | nice, but is it fair? (to you!) | XANADU::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63) | Wed Jul 10 1991 13:42 | 15 |
| re Note 1513.15 by BSS::D_BANKS:
> When I travelled frequently, I would *always*
> rent a larger car because of my leg length (will not fit in a compact car :-)
> but would always pay the difference myself.
On behalf of the many employees and stockholders of Digital,
I want to thank you for your thoughtfulness and generosity to
the company!
Since from the above statement it appears that you had no
choice but to rent a more expensive car in order to conduct
company-required business, why did you do it?
Bob
|
1513.17 | Thanks for your comments, but... | BSS::D_BANKS | David Banks -- N�ION | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:00 | 13 |
| Re:<<< Note 1513.16 by XANADU::FLEISCHER "without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63)" >>>
> Since from the above statement it appears that you had no
> choice but to rent a more expensive car in order to conduct
> company-required business, why did you do it?
Not strictly true! I *can* fit in a compact, but it's extremely uncomfortable
for me. So I simply felt that it was worth $2 per day (yes, that's all it
cost me!) for the extra comfort. No big deal...
Besides, my (ex-)manager wouldn't have approved the higher rate :-) :-)
- David
|
1513.18 | Alternate strategy. | SMAUG::GUNN | I couldn't possibly comment | Wed Jul 10 1991 18:37 | 17 |
| Further up this rat pole (Rat Holes are for short people - not valuing
differences :-) )
The size of car on the outside does not automatically determine the
size of the car on the inside. On several occasions on business trips I
have got an arbitrary AVIS rental car to find it too small to
accommodate me. I go back to the rental counter and say "I don't fit in
your car". In most instances the rental agents are most helpful and
search around for another car of suitable interior dimensions. One time
at Heathrow it took trying four cars before finding one that fitted
thanks to AVIS U.K. having decided to put sun roofs in all their cars.
(N.B. In the U.K. Vauxhall Cavaliers have the most head room in AVIS's
current fleet). Usually I have not paid any higher rate for the
different car even if it is a higher class.
There is a minor requirement of being six feet five or thereabouts for
this strategy to work.
|
1513.19 | Can you really upgrade and pay the diff? | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Not turning 39... | Thu Jul 11 1991 10:37 | 32 |
|
Is it _really_ completely acceptable for DEC if you pay for a
larger car yourself?
Given that DEC Self_insures (I.E. Agrees to pay for) any damage
to the rented cars, if you were to have an accident in a bigger
(more expensive) car than the company plan called for, would DEC
still pay for the damage? (I.e. If I upgrade from Chevette to
Mercedes at my expense, would I have to pay for all damage to
the mercedes over the cost of the company provided chevette?)
Due to a bad accident a few years ago, I'm petrified of small
cars. I've developed an alternate strategy which seems to work
out well. Whenever I travel, I get an Avis "Rapid rental"
pre-paid voucher, since I don't have a company credit card.
The Rapid Rental form is actually a Guaranteed reservation.
When I get off the plane, I got get my suitcase etc, and get
at the __END__ of the line at the Avis counter. Avis gives away
all the small cars to the people ahead of me, then gives me
a larger car for the economy car price. I've still gotten a car,
even when people ahead of me were told they were "all out of cars",
since Avis still holds something (usually big) in reserve to cover
the guaranteed rentals.
I don't know if this will work every single time, but it's always
worked for me. I get a bigger nicer car, and DEC still pays the
compact car rate...
-al
|
1513.20 | ? | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Thu Jul 11 1991 11:53 | 27 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
Well, I think we seem to get business class by default. I don't really
go into the booking details, because it's a waste of my time, and
that's why we have an inhouse travel company. The basic requirement
seems to be you MUST have Saturday overnight stay and 7 day advanced
purchase to get a cheaper fare, and then there's no changes.
I've been told that one of the reasons we fly Business class (which is
more like US economy) is that we have an arrangement with Lufthansa
that gets us a rebate for the amount of money spent with them. Dunno
whether it's true. The travel office is EXTREMELY hard to convince
that you want anything but a Business Class ticket. I've known people
to have spent days trying, and gave up.
All US travel will only get Apex or holiday fares, which makes it
cheaper to fly to the US than London. interestingly a US flight takes
about two weeks to get approved. It's not uncommon to be on the phone
on the day of flying to see whether you are to be allowed to go.
Personally, I hate flying, and I do it as little as possible. I wish I
could say the same for some other groups around here. I won't go into
details.
I always get a group "B" car, but sometimes I tend to get given a
bigger one, but I always make sure it's the same price as the group I
was booked for. Still, there seems to be a WILD difference in rates
depending on your country of booking.
|
1513.21 | What determines "acceptable"? | BSS::D_BANKS | David Banks -- N�ION | Thu Jul 11 1991 19:43 | 13 |
| Re: <<< Note 1513.19 by MUDHWK::LAWLER "Not turning 39..." >>>
> Is it _really_ completely acceptable for DEC if you pay for a
> larger car yourself?
All I can say is that in all my 10 years (as of last weekend :-) with Digital,
with a good deal of travelling, I've never had any manager or even Petty Cash
(the most appropriate name I've ever come across :-) comlain about it or even
question it. And that's with the amount shown on the expense voucher being
different from the amount on the receipt. To me that's a good indication that
it's about as acceptable as you can get...
- David
|
1513.22 | Do what's cost effective... | COPCLU::GEOFFREY | RUMMEL - The Forgotten American | Tue Jul 16 1991 07:01 | 26 |
|
Re: the base note.
Travel is usually determined by local conditions. Each country
in Europe has different market factors that influence decisions
(one of the reasons many Americans often find Europe hard to
understand at first glance). Examples:
We in Denmark book our plane tickets through the in-house travel
agent. The travel agent is charged with providing the most
cost-effective tickets. In our case this usually means business
class due to all sorts of restrictions placed upon "tourist"
class tickets. I often find myself changing my ticket several
times right up to the departure day - this can only be done with
a business class ticket. Also, if a trip gets cancelled we are
still liable for the full tourist class ticket due to cancellation
penalties. This isn't true with business class tickets. (I also
quite often have trips cancelled at the last minute.)
In a nut shell, the flexibility of the business class ticket is
why the company pays the premium - and not as an employee perk
(as the base note in all it's jealousy seems to imply).
|
1513.23 | pay economy,fly business class | FLYWAY::BENZ | SW-Licencing, Switzerland (@ZUO) | Wed Aug 14 1991 09:43 | 6 |
| I thought what we pay for is "full fare economy" tickets, which
entitles sitting in Business Class. And can be rebooked, re-used on
no-show etc.
And it means that you get no refund if you get bumped into
economy-class (because that is all you pay for to begin with).
|
1513.24 | & you thought our Price Book was difficult | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Thu Aug 15 1991 04:59 | 67 |
|
Re -1.
Not sure who "we" is, in your reply.
In the UK, you are normally booked APEX Economy, with no ability to change
bookings etc. If you fight very hard, you get S class, which is the
full economy fare & entitles you to change reservations. You are still
in the Economy cabin.
On my last 22 international trips, I have had to change reservations
16 times -- customers are unpredicable creatures. In 11 cases the cost
of change much exceeded the cost of paying the money upfront to gain
flexibility. It's flexibility that the airlines charge for -- not for
a free bottle of pop, or a hot piece of chicken.
Before I joined DEC, I was on the Board of Management of a large airline,
& we spent a great deal of time & effort in juggling fares & conditions
to maximise yield & minimise slideover. (In those days I travelled First
Class -- it's only now that I am hit by the conditions that I was party
to imposing!) Minimising slideover is another reason why on many
European routes the economy cabin is just about as small as can
physically be provided within the aircraft. The intent is that if, as
an economy passenger, you want to change reservations on key business
routes, the few economy seats have long been booked to entitle those
passengers to the rock-bottom fare, & the only space left is in Business
Class -- at a very hefty upgrade premium.
The only benefit of this experience is that personal contacts meant that
many of my re-routings cost DEC no upgrade -- you still can't beat having
friends in the right place. Luckily, they don't look for massive
discounts in return ....
Airlines are well aware that most companies have external-image
critical staff who are allergic to hassle, & who argue convincingly that
all of this aggravation to travellers is counter-productive to their
equanimity in front of customers & trading partners -- ie book Business
in Europe. Some companies are exceptions!
Those who pursue value-pricing can make out a strong case that the
incremental cost for inbuilt flexibility on an annual personal budget
can be more than covered on one incremental contract success (or
failure -- caused by lack of professionalism, eg arriving late,
looking stressed, fuming at the rights & wrongs of the irritation just
handed out to you at the airport, having to leave a meeting at the
scheduled time 'cos you can't change your booking -- even if your
customer wants more etc).
Personally, I protect myself from unneccesary stress obvious to the
customer by following the ticket condition rules, but allowing adequate
time for extra hassle -- eg travel earlier, return later, overnight more
often etc. Means you protect DEC's image with the customer --- but can
cost more (to DEC in cash & lost office hours, & staff in lost own time)
than booking Business class to begin with.
Funny old world. If you do travel extensively, it it sometimes difficult
to be confident that accountants have a full grasp of the concepts of
indirect costs & opportunity costs. As for those folk who see jumping on
& off aeroplanes as a jolly ........... no comment.
Colin
|
1513.25 | Slideover? | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:10 | 5 |
| re: .24
What's "slideover"?
Bob
|
1513.26 | Slideover = | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Mon Aug 19 1991 04:17 | 12 |
|
Sorry - bad as comms guys with jargon ....
Slideover = the natural desire for customers to save money by
downgrading travel class, given that all parts of the aeroplane go to
the same place, & arrive at the same time.
Solution. Difficult, unless you surround low end fares with restrictive
conditions. Possible salvation from extra service (row width, goodies,
exec clubs, separate check-in etc), but trivial impact compared to
making flexibility hard to find.
|