T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1393.1 | US Car Plan | BOSACT::EARLY | Hey Mister: Wanna buy a Framework? | Fri Mar 08 1991 09:47 | 44 |
| Company Car (Plan A) Digital leases a vehicle thru GELCO
leasing. They pay for everything
(insurance, gas, oil, car wash, parking,
repairs). The employee must pay Digital
$30 every week for private use of the
car (regardless of how little/much the
vehicle is used for personal travel).
Generally, employee pays for the gas and
miscellaneous expenses during the week and
deducts that from the $30 they owe DEC.
Sometimes you owe the company, and
sometimes they owe you.
When ordering a new car, employee gets to
pick from 2-3 different models. Some
options are provided (like A/C, Radio,
Tape Deck). Employee can order additional
options at his/her own expense. These
costs can NOT be recovered by the employee
for any reason. If you order $1,500 worth
of options and change jobs 4 months later,
you lose your $1,500. (Unless the job you
switch to entitles you to a car ... then
you can move the car to your new cost ctr.)
Use Your Car (Plan B) Available only to "field people" (like
sales and EIS). Digital writes you a check
for $250/month LESS a deduction for income
tax. In addition the employee gets 8� per
mile driven on company business. Employee
pays their own insurance, gas, oil, etc.
To do this, the car must be 4 years old or
less. If in sales, the car must be a 4-door
car capable of carrying 5 passengers.
Use Your Car (Plan C) For all other employees who don't qualify
for Plan A or B (i.e., they are not in the
field), Digital pays 22.5� per mile
traveled on company business.
/se
|
1393.2 | Don't forget the IRS gets its cut ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Profitability is never having to say you're sorry! | Fri Mar 08 1991 09:52 | 3 |
| ... by requiring DEC to figure a "fair market value"(?) of the benefit
of a Plan A car, subtract the $30 per week you already pay, and add the
difference to your W-2 wages each year.
|
1393.3 | PLAN B IS $200/MO MINUS TAXES AND $.08/BUSINESS MILE | CSOA1::ROOT | North Central States Regional Support | Fri Mar 08 1991 10:15 | 10 |
| re: .1
Since when was plan B $250/mo - taxes. It's $200/mo - taxes. I've been
on plan B for 13 years. My monthly check went from $200/mo to
$172.76/mo when they started taking out taxes. This was just verified
both by personnel and fleet as I write this reply.
Regards
AL ROOT
|
1393.4 | Overview answer | MINAR::BISHOP | | Fri Mar 08 1991 12:49 | 10 |
| Given that the writer is not from the US, perhaps a more "overview"
answer is being asked for.
While in England (and possibly other countries) a large number of
people have cars provided by their employer, in the US it's not as
common. Company cars are normally used only by sales, service and
delivery people who must travel a lot as part of their jobs. Most
Americans own a car privately, having used a loan to buy it.
-John Bishop
|
1393.5 | walking allowance?? | MAMTS3::GTOPPING | | Fri Mar 08 1991 14:28 | 11 |
| Given that we are discussing this type of thing, maybe someone can
clear something up for me. I have heard that in certain big cities
(e.g., New York), people get a 'walking allowance' instead of a car
plan.
Is this true?
If so, how does it work? do you still get reimbursed for cab or bus
fare, etc?
Thanks
|
1393.6 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | History is written by the victors | Sat Mar 09 1991 17:40 | 26 |
| re .4:
I don't have any statistics (and I wouldn't believe in them anyway :-)
but it's not all *that* common in Europe either.
It is fairly common in certain types of jobs - the main reason being
that the 'fair market value' set by the respective tax people tends to
be less than the REAL value, so the car is considered a nice fringe
benefit especially for those people who are in the upper brackets of
progressive income tax (and everyone has a car anyway, even in Europe).
I've been away for this week (and there has been some talk about a new
car policy for DEC Germany in the meantime, explaining the sudden
interest of German participants in these questions). I don't know what
the new announcements were, though..
Re walking allowance - I think this applies (applied?) to people
walking in our Central London office too - justification being, a car
in Central London is useless anyway..
I think there's a basic difference in philosophy: in some
countries/companies a car is considered a fringe benefit, is some
others a tool you need to do your job. That's fine as long as both
sides agree on this... over here, in Germany, the problem is very much
more complicated (legally) but that's another story.
|
1393.7 | $200 (minus taxes); 5 years old | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Mon Mar 11 1991 09:07 | 8 |
| Re .3 (re .1)
Not only is U.S. Plan B $200 (instead of the posted $250), but as of a
couple of years ago the car can be 5 model years old instead of the
posted 4. (I know, I still have an '86 on Plan B, and my last check was
still $200 less taxes.)
BD�
|
1393.8 | Who wants a Ford Taurus? | HOCUS::BOESCHEN | | Mon Mar 11 1991 11:49 | 13 |
| re .5:
In NY, we recieve an extra check along with your first pay check of the
month.
The Manhattan Allowance is $110/week gross with is taxed. It nets out to
approx. $330/month.
It is generally viewed as "battle" pay, having to tolerate commuting
to the city everyday, which costs approx. $150/month train fare, plus
1 1/2 hour door to door commute.
|
1393.9 | Wouldn't it be nice... | ESCROW::LAWLER | I'm not 38. | Mon Mar 11 1991 12:16 | 8 |
|
Gee - I wonder if us N.H. people who have to work in Mass
could get the same thing? :^)
-al
|
1393.10 | | JAWS::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:19 | 13 |
|
RE:9
Yeah! 120 miles round trip per day,I would appreciate an allowance
as well.
The things we do today for a job. Oh-well!
Rick (A Jerry Williams fan)
|
1393.11 | | JAWS::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:21 | 7 |
|
Does DEC sell these cars and trucks to the employee?
Is there a listing in the U.S. Area?
Rick
|
1393.12 | used to be able to buy them | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Mon Mar 11 1991 15:33 | 8 |
| Re .11 (Rick)
I bought each of my Plan A cars when they hit end of life. I imagine
the policy is still the same, but I don't know for sure. I suggest you
call Fleet and ask. I don't know if there's a listing of Plan A cars
available for purchase.
BD�
|
1393.13 | Mhtn Allwnce Not For Everyone | NYEM1::MAHER | I am he as you are he as you are me...nice to meet you | Mon Mar 11 1991 16:48 | 10 |
| re: .8
Not everyone in Manhattan gets the "Manhattan Allowance." I transferred
to NYO from California. My boss tried to get me a salary bump, but
Personnel (oops, Human Resources) said no way -- they consider the cost
of living the same here as there. I've got an issue with that, but
that's life.
I think the "Manhattan Allowance" may be something to do with Sales
only. Does anybody know for sure?
|
1393.14 | Buying cars may not be what it used to be | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Tue Mar 12 1991 10:27 | 14 |
| re: buying cars
Keep in mind that the new Plan A rules "apparently" state (that is,
I've been told this, but have seen no official policy verbage) that
Plan A cars will now be run into the ground. If the car continues to
function flawlessly, it apparently can be kept around until the 80-85K
mile mark (or longer -- this is not clear). Otherwise, once a car
passes about 50K miles, it will be retired when it begins to cost money
(i.e., it breaks down).
Hence, you can expect to purchase either a VERY high-mileage vehicle or
a broken one (which may have high mileage as well).
-- Russ
|
1393.15 | | WKRP::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), SWS, Cincinnati | Tue Mar 12 1991 18:02 | 27 |
| Check out the various sections in the VTX US_FLEET policies.
Note that several sections were updated last april. Among other things
the end-of-life for a plan A car was reduced to 30 Mo. or 50K miles.
Note also that the policy permits you to purchase the car earlier, if
you obtain the appropriate signature (District Mgr.).
I can personally attest that these policies are valid; My plan A car
recently turned 30 mo., and I just completed the entire purchase cycle,
including transfer of the vehicle to Plan B.
From careful reading of the original memo and some inquiries, the only
thing that is being restricted is the acquisition of *new* plan A cars.
If you have a Plan A car that you want to
a) purchase and move to plan B, go for it, no problems.
b) purchase and get a new plan A car, you will probably be permitted to
purchase it, but you will probably get a used/unassigned plan A car.
c) replace with a new plan A car, unless the car is on it's last legs,
this won't happen. If it is on it's last legs, odds are you will
not get a new car, but a used/unassigned plan A car. Only when the
car has reached it's *real* end-of-life, and there are *no* used/
unassigned cars available will a new car order be placed.
Regards,
Dave
|
1393.16 | Someone's quoting "new policies"... | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Wed Mar 13 1991 08:55 | 33 |
| re: .15
> Note that several sections were updated last april. Among other things
> the end-of-life for a plan A car was reduced to 30 Mo. or 50K miles.
Please note the following excerpt of a memo which came from our DM's
office:
> Last Tuesday, January 15th, I spoke with Ken Monier, Regional
>Business Partner reporting to Don Zereski. Ken is responsible
>for the US fleet and is located @ALF (DTN 385-2320).
...
> . Plan A vehicles will now be kept for 48 months and/or
> 80,000 miles, unless deemed unfit by GELCO;
>
> . Once a Plan A vehicles has been deemed unfit, an
> unassigned vehicle (of which there are 300 in the
> Washington metropolitan area) will be assigned as a
> replacement.
>
> . The time limit for Plan B vehicles is five years.
>
> This policy will be in effect until further notice. NOTE:
>Once all of the unassigned vehicles have been assigned, your Plan
>A car reaches 48 months and/or 80,000 miles, THEN a new car may
>be ordered. There will be no exceptions!
>
> Should you have any questions or require additional
>information, please contact Ken as mentioned above.
-- Russ
|
1393.17 | The walk in allowance | MCDONL::GONSALVES | Serv | Thu Mar 21 1991 16:42 | 10 |
| RE: a few back
The folks in Manhattan (I used to be one) that get a walk in allowance
are those who are in a position (ie sales/support/pss) that would allow
them to participate in plan A or B if they were not in Manhattan.
I think there are a couple of other US cities that have walk in
allowances as well.
Serv
|
1393.18 | Gelco prices - how high can they get?? | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Wed Apr 24 1991 00:28 | 9 |
| I just learned today that the GELCO folks are planning to charge DEC
$500 per month / per car for each car on the road! In light of the fact
that we now have to keep the cars until they "fall apart", it is
AMAZING what is paid for these cars - $6K per year. If they are kept
for 4 years - not inconceivable on the current plan - DEC will layout
$24K per car! It is inconceivable that even adding insurance and
repairs / tires, it is anything but a ripoff to DEC! I think that a
DECENT large increase in plan B allowance would easily gain back
several million in costs!
|
1393.19 | | CUJO::BERNARD | Dave from Cleveland | Wed Apr 24 1991 10:01 | 9 |
|
RE: -.1
The few people I've talked to in other computer companies only have
a plan B-type option. The common figure is a $450/month allowance,
which is subject to witholding. No extra per-mile rate is given.
The employee pays insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc.
|
1393.20 | No excuses left to not raise Plan B ?? | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Fri May 10 1991 23:28 | 6 |
| Given this confirmation of other computer companies car plans & our own
costs for cars per month; it seems clear that there is NO justification
to not increase plan B compensation. Even at $400 per mo. compensation
for a B plan, the company could save $600 per year for each employee
who converted plans. With an ATTRACTIVE option, a few hundred thousand
could easily be saved per year.
|
1393.21 | | ALOSWS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Sat May 11 1991 11:01 | 9 |
| One of the things which frosts me is getting my Fleet Cost Center
report every month. I lay out $450/month for each Plan A car and $200
for the single (mine!) Plan B. I'd guess that at $350/month for
Plan B, you would probably not have too many complaints if you did away
with Plan A, and that would save the company a few million dollars. A
real win-win.
Al
|
1393.22 | | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Some assembly required | Sat May 11 1991 17:25 | 5 |
| Having just recently come onto Plan B, does anyone know the date of the
last increase in the Plan B allowance?
Just curious
Jon
|
1393.23 | | ALOSWS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Sun May 12 1991 12:28 | 11 |
| re: -1
It was at the same time the demise of Plan A was announced (then
rescinded), about 2-3 years ago. Previous to that it was $180 ever
since (and presumably before) I joined the company in '83.
Just using a crude sort of rate of change analysis, intuition tells you
it was either way too high a decade ago or way too low now.
Al
|
1393.24 | flip side of .20 | DYPSS1::SMITH | TBDBITL Alumnus | Mon May 13 1991 17:52 | 10 |
| Re: .20
>to not increase plan B compensation. Even at $400 per mo. compensation
>for a B plan, the company could save $600 per year for each employee
>who converted plans. With an ATTRACTIVE option, a few hundred thousand
>could easily be saved per year.
Don't forget that it will cost the company $1200/yr for every employee
already on Plan B. To break even, you will need two employees to
switch for every one already on Plan B.
|
1393.25 | not a math major | DYPSS1::SMITH | TBDBITL Alumnus | Mon May 13 1991 17:55 | 4 |
| Let me be the first one to correct my own math. If plan B goes to $400
per mo. then it will cost the company $2400/yr for each employee
currently on plan B. That means you will need four employees to switch
from A to B for every one already on B just to break even.
|
1393.26 | | WHOS01::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Tue May 14 1991 11:28 | 12 |
| re -.1;
If you drop plan A, that's not a problem since it would appear that
less than 10% of the field is currently on plan B. Besides, this move
would also significanly reduce the administrative overhead cost of plan
A (Fleet Admin., some processing of weekly expense forms, accident
report processing, claims handling).
Of course, since I'm currently on plan A, I think this is a terible
idea ;^)
-dave
|
1393.27 | Last Plan B changes and Tranistion Issues | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | I manage my cat? | Mon May 27 1991 04:08 | 29 |
|
In Sept 1988 the rate for Plan B increased from $180 to $200
In 1990 Plan B compensation became eligble for FICA inclusion
dropping Plan B from $200 per month to $184.70
Of course Plan B compensation has alway been taxable income.
Issues to get people from Plan A to Plan B
1) Have Digital provide a vehicle finance/lease program
to assist the employee in Digital's name.
- Car Payments adversely effect
credit ratings especially in areas of the country with
very high housing costs.
2) Have Digital provide a special auto insurance program.
3) Have Digital assume or assist with some of the maintenance
risks
4) Make the compenstation commensurate with the above costs.
Of course today, how many district managers will approve new
Plan A cars?
|