T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1261.1 | Phone calls - the old fashioned way to get information | SICML::LEVIN | My kind of town, Chicago is | Mon Nov 05 1990 19:38 | 5 |
| re: .0 "Does anyone know ..."
Have you called Fleet Administration and asked?
/M
|
1261.2 | Fleet gave me 2 different answers | ENOVAX::WATSON | | Tue Nov 06 1990 09:30 | 7 |
| Yes, I have called twice. Last week I was told that they would have
the list by the end of the week. This week I was told that they
haven't heard anything and have no idea when the new list will be out.
Meanwhile, my car is almost at 60,000 miles and with the lead time
of 12 weeks, and the amount of business miles I drive, I will be way
over 65,000 miles by the time my new car arrives....assuming I can
order it this month. (It's too late to order a 1990 model)
|
1261.3 | -< What a waste! > | MFGMEM::LONGO | | Tue Nov 06 1990 10:30 | 2 |
|
My own personal car has 69,659 miles ans still going strong.
|
1261.4 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | The new phone book's here!! | Tue Nov 06 1990 14:23 | 6 |
|
Yeah, what's the significance of the 60K miles? Do company
cars spontaneously combust when they get to 65K?
Shawn L.
|
1261.5 | | BIGRED::GALE | Okay, I'll settle for 12/11/90 | Tue Nov 06 1990 15:24 | 8 |
| I have called several times, last time I was told not to expect
any car deliveries until Mid Feb, or March of 1991!...
Hence, I have had to rent a car in Texas...
If you find out anything, PLEASE post it... I have this lease until the
middle of February, so don't have to get panicky until then... but
still....
|
1261.6 | | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Tue Nov 06 1990 16:11 | 12 |
| Re: Note 1261.4 by MILKWY::SLABOUNTY
� Yeah, what's the significance of the 60K miles? Do company
� cars spontaneously combust when they get to 65K?
Don't quote me, but I vaguely recall someone explaining that
statistically, the fleet gets more expensive to maintain than to
replace when the barrier is crossed. (Probably believable - care to
compare the annual maintenance cost for a fleet of VAX 11/780s versus
the purchase of equivalent 3100s?)
BD�
|
1261.7 | 60K mailes | STAR::PARKE | I'm a surgeon, NOT Jack the Ripper | Tue Nov 06 1990 16:15 | 33 |
| Re: .4
The company lease is for either 60K miles or 3 years, whichever comes first,
as far as I recollect. At least this is the way it was 5 years ago when I was
still in the field.
I believe most lease contracts carry penalties for exceeding the parameters
of the lease. Hopefully the size of our fleet contract can be used to outweigh
that. Private leases can get quite expensive if you exceed the annual (or
terminal) mileage and exceeding the date is even harder.
Most of the overflow that I saw in the field was in high mileage areas such as
a New England office covering Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont or other
widespread travel areas. It's easier to preorder a car if you are about to hit
the three year line (not often) than if you "figure" you are going over 60K
within, say, the next three months. Also, this annual Tom foolery aroung
closing down ordering for 3-6 months at a time because of negotiations doesn't
help (except it opens the door to "emergency" orders where you take what you
get and it is probably more exoensive to DIGITAL to order this way).
With all our "extra" staff, why cann't we dedicate some of them to managing and
ordering our own fleet, instead of hireing outsiders to do it for us. We have
got to be big enough to do the negotiations directly with the auto companies or
at least major national "ordering" services and I'll bet if we funded,
controlled, our own maintainence it would be more reasonable and cheaper.
You wouldn't believe how tough it was to get show tires on those cars (why
would one EVER want snow tires on a car in Maine after all). Some of the
other fol-de-rol around getting preventitive maint was nonsense. I had a
shimmy in the front end of a company car, they (GELCO) wouldn't let me fix it,
or balance the tires, but they would buy new tires when the old ones wouldn't
pass inspection (complaining about tire wear).
|
1261.8 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Tue Nov 06 1990 17:31 | 2 |
| Sounds awful wasteful to me. Modern cars are just gettin' warmed up
at 60K. Have we uncovered a possible source of major cost savings?
|
1261.9 | Duck, it's a low blow! | CSOADM::HALL | | Tue Nov 06 1990 19:07 | 7 |
| I believe the author of .8 may be on to something. My car that I drive
on fleet plan B has 130,000 miles on it and still going. The only
major repairs were a new steering rack and a power steering pump.
All together less than $500. in cost. Most any new car should last
100k miles if cared for properly. But I'm anxiously waiting word
from Fleet about any changes for 1991, I do believe I am pushing
my luck a little bit.
|
1261.10 | Worn tires and brakes won't be replaced | ENOVAX::WATSON | | Wed Nov 07 1990 09:08 | 11 |
| re. .3, .4, and .8 Jealousy doesn't become you.
Do you drive over 500 business miles per week? Well, I am one of those
that does. My car also has original tires and brakes, both of which
are worn and cannot be replaced because the car has over 55,000 miles.
I don't find that to be a safe car for the upcoming winter driving.
For those of you who do drive a fleet car and are awaiting the 1991
list, I will post the info here when I get it.
Robin
|
1261.11 | over 55K? expense repairs | ODIXIE::SILVERS | Sales Support Ninja... | Wed Nov 07 1990 09:33 | 4 |
| I recently turned in a DECmobile with a little over 74K on it, and
I was able to get tires replaced and brakes fixed by having the work
done and expensing the cost - at the recommendation of GELCO, you just
have to get your CC manager to approve it. Good luck....
|
1261.12 | Park it...Today!! | COOKIE::LENNARD | | Wed Nov 07 1990 11:39 | 6 |
| .10...I don't appreciate your remarks. If you were on the other plan
you wouldn't have a problem. If your brakes and tires are that bad
you have an obligation to park it or fix it...and your manager faces
serious liability exposure if repairs are not approved. But, thanks
for telling me. I'll make it a point to give DECMobiles more room
from now on.
|
1261.13 | lease your own SOON | CISM::VASICA | | Wed Nov 07 1990 11:39 | 5 |
| I understand that several field offices will not be offering DEC Fleet
autos in the future...TOO EXPENSIVE...They will be offering an
allowance which the employee may use to lease privately or use to their
own transport. This does not stick the corp. with cars when the
drivers move on or Transition elsewhere...
|
1261.14 | another Plan B refugee | GRANPA::BALPERT | | Wed Nov 07 1990 11:44 | 10 |
| I have also been trying to get some kind of commitment out of U.S. Fleet
as to selection and delivery date. No luck yet. My Plan B car has nearly
130,000 miles, marginal tires, and a failing transmission. (At least
it is still running!) Also this is the last year the car qualifies for
Plan B as it is a 1985 model.
Anyone know what happens when you cross over the 5-year old limit on Plan B,
that is, how long before the checks stop?
Bob A.
|
1261.15 | I believe the checks stop the end of the CALENDAR ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Opposite of progress? Con-gress! | Wed Nov 07 1990 13:53 | 9 |
| ... year in which the 5-year rule hits. I haven't heard how vigilant
we are now, but my guess is you will still get them for a few months. I seem
to remember that each CC has to monitor Plan B compliance, but my memory
is from 2 years ago!
RE: the attempt to remove Plan A - There's a LOOOONG string in
here from about 2 years ago, the last time that was broached. If they do it, it
will HAVE to be across the board, EIS, SALES, CS, the works! Can't recall
the topic #, believe it or not!
|
1261.16 | RUMOR or TRUTH | SNOWY::HEDRICK | South Central Area Support | Wed Nov 07 1990 16:37 | 7 |
| RE. .13
Is this just rumor or is this true about some FIELD offices not
getting PLAN A deals anymore?
|
1261.17 | re.15 | NEWVAX::TURRO | Watch the skies | Thu Nov 08 1990 07:02 | 11 |
|
Why do you feel it should be across the board. cs engineers have to run
around allover the place.. Not to just one customer site. And we have
to lug around all sorts of stuff. My impression of EIS and SWS is
different than that...Sales thats another story....
Mike
By the way if the selections get finalized can someone find out
prices of available options...
|
1261.18 | Number of days in a std year + 200 | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Thu Nov 08 1990 10:15 | 1 |
| re: .15 Car note is 565.*
|
1261.19 | STILL GOING STRONG | PFSVAX::MAYHORN | | Thu Nov 08 1990 14:14 | 4 |
| YOU ARE RIGHT THE NEWER CARS ARE LASTING LONGER IF TAKEN CARE OF.I
BOUGHT MY CO. CAR WHEN IT HAD 74K ON IT THAT WAS 7 YEARS AGO NOW IT HAS
194K AND THE ONLY THING IT HAS NEEDED IS TIRES AND MUFFLER.
BAM...
|
1261.20 | | BIGRED::GALE | Okay, I'll settle for 12/11/90 | Fri Nov 09 1990 07:33 | 22 |
| .17> to lug around all sorts of stuff. My impression of EIS and SWS is
.17> different than that...Sales thats another story....
Just so your impression can be pointed in the right direction...
In any given typical week, I can be at no less than 15 DIFFERENT
customer sites. I support 9 different salesmen. Last night I
was at a customer site until almost 9pm. I'll be at the same customer
again next week for the same time period. There are times I am at 4 or
5 customer sites a day. Last month, I put an average of 450-500 miles
on my car EACH week for DEC travel.
I start work at 7am everyday, and most of the time don't get out of the
office (or customer) until well after 6pm, EVERYDAY. BTW: Don't read
that as a complaint, cuz its not, I enjoy my job and its the best job I
have ever had at DEC and wouldn't give it up for anything right now.
But, if you think that SWS is someone who sits in the office, all day,
you need to re-think your thinking.
Gale
|
1261.21 | | KARHU::MICCILE | | Fri Nov 09 1990 10:49 | 25 |
|
Re: .13
First, the company (DEC) isn't getting stuck with anything. Since
Dec does not purchase the vehile anyway. They have an agreement with
GE (formerly Gelco) on a lease program. Second, they (Dec) about 2
years ago was considering doing away with fleet cars...that got
quickly shutdown after looking at the overall expense of plan b.
Dec employees *must* still pay for there personal mileage. It is not
a given. And last, which is a reply to .4. Last july i had to travel
from Manchester NH to Portland ME. daily. My car had 55,000 miles on
it then. The tires were in poor shape to say the least. The car would
shake at 50. One tire was down to steel. I had to battle with Gelco
to replace my tires. Who are they to tell me that this vehile was safe
to drive with bald tires? My last phone call with Gelco on that
problem i talked to a Gelco rep. and told him that i held him
personally responsible if anything happen while i was driving this
car. Needless to say the tires were replaced. This is the kind of
stuff we have to deal with when the company car reaches its so-called
live expectancy. Its not a waste..its the company policy. And Dec is
paying good money for it. So they expect to have good running vehiles.
|
1261.22 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | The new phone book's here!! | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:26 | 22 |
|
RE: .21
I don't know much about lease agreements, but I don't see why
the leasing company would replace bald tires. Do they? Do
you call up GE [GELCO] when you run out of gas too?
That should be an issue with your CC manager, to approve the
purchase of new tires.
The driver of a vehicle is responsible for the vehicle, and
anything that might have happened to the car WHILE YOU WERE
driving it would be your responsibility.
RE: .10
Jealous of what?? I don't drive a company car. I'd take my
car over anything DEC has to offer.
Shawn L.
|
1261.23 | Some info for Shawn... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:46 | 13 |
| re: .22
GELCO manages the maintenance on the fleet cars just like an HMO does your
health care. You must get service done at a location that accepts GELCO
purchase orders if the expense is more than $30. They also explicitly
require approval before and tire and/or brake work is done, regardless of cost.
This means that gas, oil, and oil changes are about the only thing I can
expense on my weekly expense report.
Your CC manager has nothing to do with it. The CC pays a flat fee per month
for each fleet car assigned to the CC.
Bob
|
1261.24 | Them's the rules... | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:56 | 20 |
| re: .22
With Plan A, the usual rule of thumb is:
1. If it is under $30, expense it.
2. If it is over $30, GELCO must approve it.
There are explicit rules, but that sums it up for most things.
So, if you can buy new tires for under $30 total cost, your golden. If
you can't, you MUST get GELCO's pre-approval or risk the possibility of
taking the costs out of pocket (if your CC mgr decides that you didn't
follow procedure -- which you didn't).
I once successfully expensed a single tire which blew out 200+ miles
from home, but I wouldn't want to try to pass a new set of tires by my
CC mgr unless I was ready to assume the total cost myself should the
attempt fail.
-- Russ
|
1261.25 | Whoops -- Bob snuck in ahead of me... 8^) | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Fri Nov 09 1990 13:57 | 1 |
|
|
1261.26 | I'm making too much sense, so I'll stop now. | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | The new phone book's here!! | Fri Nov 09 1990 14:40 | 16 |
|
RE: Last 2
Alright, thanks. But the thing I don't understand is how a
person could be turned down from buying new tires for a car.
If they're bad, they're bad. They'll have to be replaced
soon anyways, right? [Of course, I think I just answered my
own question ... another 3 weeks and the car won't be yours,
so just wait and someone else will replace them.]
Depending on the cost of the tire, I'd probably risk replac-
ing them and hope to get reimbursed. I plan on being around
for awhile, and I don't like the idea that $200 worth of new
tires could have saved me from blowing a tire and killing my-
self.
Shawn L.
|
1261.27 | who's responsible??? | KARHU::MICCILE | | Fri Nov 09 1990 15:22 | 10 |
|
re:22
You sure don't know anything about lease vehiles or you would
maybe understand who's responsible for what. CC managers are as
responsible for company cars as you are responsible for the sunrise.
Nor am i responsible if GE refuses to put new tires on my car and
i'm in an accident due to it....and there wouldn't be a court system
in the world who deviate from that.
|
1261.28 | Override-Override | AUNTB::REAMS | POSITIVE WIZARDS CREATE THEIR FUTURE | Fri Nov 09 1990 15:44 | 7 |
| To answer one of the questions/beliefs that has come up in this
string....Gelco and/or Fleet can "recommend" that certain maintenance
procedures not be performed, HOWEVER, the Cost Center manager HAS the
authority to override these recommendation..bottom line is that the
C.C. managers have the ability to spend their money as they deem
necessary.
|
1261.29 | Sorry about the rat-hole, but ... | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | The new phone book's here!! | Fri Nov 09 1990 15:53 | 16 |
|
>Nor am i responsible if GE refuses to put new tires on my car and
>i'm in an accident due to it....and there wouldn't be a court system
>in the world who deviate from that.
And I disagree with this. If you knew that the tires on the
car you were driving had steel belts coming through and you
drove it anyways, that makes you responsible for any mishap.
A good lawyer might be able to argue differently, but it was
your "choice" [bad word ... but I can't think of a better one]
to drive the car.
Shawn L.
|
1261.30 | | KARHU::MICCILE | | Fri Nov 09 1990 16:13 | 12 |
|
We could argue about this forever....and thats not my intent. I
except your understanding of this. My point is this, i wish GE, GELCO
or whoever it may be...when it comes time for my company vehile to
be serviced it wouldn't be such an adventure. I look at it this way.
When a customer logs a service call, i don't tell them "MR customer
the live expectency of your computer is over..therefore i cannot
service it". I just ask that they take responsiblity for THERE job.
Its a good damm thing Digital doesn't run its compnay this way.
Or this conversation would have never happen in the first place.
|
1261.31 | Here's a cost savings point! | GLDOA::FULLER | World's most dangerous FS engineer | Sun Nov 11 1990 00:49 | 15 |
| re: .23
>This means that gas, oil, and oil changes are about the only thing I can
>expense on my weekly expense report.
Our CC manager discovered that the monthly charge our CC pays for GELCO
fleet maintenance includes oil changes. Therefore, if I expense an oil
change, the CC is paying twice for that oil change. Since this
discovery, oil changes have to be performed at a place that accepts a
GELCO P.O.
Assuming oil changes every 5000 miles @ $20 each, over the 60,000 mile
lifespan of a company car, this is a savings of $240/car. With 75 cars
in our (Customer Services) CC, it adds up.
Stu
|
1261.32 | How about making it FAIL inspection? | MUDHWK::LAWLER | Twelve Cylinders - NO LUCAS electrics. | Mon Nov 12 1990 07:32 | 12 |
|
I'm not sure if this suggestion would work or not, but what if
you took the car for a "State Safety Inspection"? If the car
failed (And the inspection sticker was removed), then it would
seem impossible for the lease company to refuse to fix the
problem... (If they did simply put another sticker on, you could
take the car to the state agency that oversees inspections and
get them in trouble that way...)
Not sure if this is feasible or not, but if all the 'proper'
methods have failed, it might be worth considering...
|
1261.33 | Mileage Cutoff | FASDER::AHERB | | Thu Nov 15 1990 08:47 | 9 |
| I don't recall where I read it recently but, the arrangement with GELCO
is that they are responsible for paying maintenance only up to a set
mileage (55K?). After that, the individual CC must pay for it (expense
voucher reimbursement. In other words, don't even bother calling GELCO
after the magic mileage. All you need is approval of the CC manager. No
one is telling an employee to drive around on bald tires.
I've been fortunate, my Celebrity has 64K miles on the original tires
and they look just fine.
|
1261.34 | | KARHU::MICCILE | | Thu Nov 15 1990 16:32 | 14 |
|
re:33
But thats my whole point...my car only had 48k on it at the time. It
seems to me ( and i am now going on my 5th company car) that when your
company car reaches over 45k, its then that it is differcult to get it
serviced. I remember back about 3 years ago, my car needed a brake
job. It had about 45k on it. I brought it in to a midas shop and they
refused to work on it due to that Gelco was known in the past not to
pay there bills. So what i have been hearing from this notes file is
that i should pay for it myself and let Dec pickup the tab. Well if
Dec is already paying big $$$ for the lease package, then why should
Dec have to pay for those maintanan charges. That should be and is
included in the lease package.
|
1261.35 | tires @ 61,000 | NERSW5::MARTINELLO | Don't Panic | Fri Nov 16 1990 15:29 | 10 |
|
Maybe GELCO ( GE Leasing COmpany for those who are interested )
is getting soft. Last Septermber they approved the installation of
new brakes in my car with over 61,000 miles. My CC manager said
if they do not do the job have it done and expense the charges.
Now if I can get them to replace the tires with 68,000, they are
only done to the wear bars.
joe m
|
1261.36 | New limit is 80K | NEWVAX::FS71R | S. Va. District CS Engineers | Sun Nov 25 1990 18:11 | 10 |
| I've just found out that we will drive our company cars until they
reach 80,000 miles or 5 years (whichever comes first).
This makes good business sense. As pointed out in previous notes, cars
today will last to 80K and beyond if properly cared for. My Taurus has
60K with virtually no problems.
Chris Lane
|
1261.37 | Plan A Cars @ 80,000 miles: are you sure? | ODIXIE::GEORGE | | Wed Nov 28 1990 14:41 | 8 |
| I just called Fleet. They are approving safety-related repairs to Plan
A vehicles over 60,000 miles because the new plan has not yet been
approved. They categorically denied, however, that the retirement-age
*policy* has been changed to 80,000 miles/5 years.
Do you have any corroborating evidence? Thanks....
Steve
|
1261.38 | I'll find out. | NEWVAX::FS71R | S. Va. District CS Engineers | Fri Nov 30 1990 08:22 | 8 |
| The information was contained in a memo from my manager stating "plan
on keeping your company car for 80,000 miles/5 years; whichever is
first". I will get clarification if this is corporate or local policy.
Again, I think this is a good idea.
Chris Lane
|
1261.39 | Is this a calculated delay? | AUSTIN::UNLAND | Sic Biscuitus Disintegratum | Mon Dec 03 1990 02:45 | 28 |
| It seems that every year, the process of "negotiating" a new car plan
takes at least a month longer than the last. Various reasons have been
attributed to this: car manufacturing capacity, model variations, and
even cost. But I have to wonder if the Company has not made a deliber-
ate decision to delay the new car plan, in much the same way it has done
every year with the salary plans.
If so, I hope someone is doing their homework, because from where I
stand, it looks like this yearly foulup costs DEC even more. My car
died back around the time that the 1990 (yeah, all five months of it)
car plan was expiring. Since emergency orders do not not even seem to
exist anymore, I ended up getting a rental on a quote temporary unquote
basis. So far, this rental has probably cost us more than a whole year's
worth of plan A car expenses.
Every year, this company seems to be more at the mercy of it's own
beaureaucratic folly. We cannot maintain any internal consistency,
so our people spend all of their time trying to figure out the rules
for this week rather than concentrating on making and selling our
products. Instead of being a tool to get our job done, the car plan
has turned into an administrative burden that saps our productivity.
Every so often I find a support person in Digital who actually
believes that it is their job to *support* the ones who actually
deliver products to the customer. To those dedicated souls, I
give my heartfelt thanks. To the rest, well ...
Geoff
|
1261.40 | Another Plan A car concern | CANYON::NEVEU | SWA EIS Consultant | Mon Dec 03 1990 13:50 | 36 |
| Re. .39
I too am wondering if this is not a calculated delay. In light of the
fact that several hundred people have been added to the field organiza-
tions in the past several months, and more are soon to graduate from
sales and sales support training, there are no floater cars left in any
field offices.
The emergency process was very expensive and my management would prefer
not to utilize it but they also have not authorized a rental car either.
Because my wife had temporary access to an automobile I did not pursue
getting the Plan A car, I was promised on my transfer. But now I am
beginning to realize that it will be 12 or more weeks after Fleet
announces the 1991 selection opening before I will even see a car, and
I am wondering how I get her a car in January when she loses access to
the car she now uses. I did not ship my two cars when I moved because
I was suppose to get a company car. But there are no floaters and the
emergency process is too expensive so I am without a company car. If
I had shipped two cars, I would be on Plan B. But I really did not
want to keep my car without air conditioning in the Arizona heat, and I
was suppose to get a company car.... So far I have saved DEC the cost
of shipping my second car, and the cost of giving me a company car for
5 weeks since my arrival, but my patience is about to run out (or
should I say my wife's is). And the cost of a rental car may be what
it takes to calm her down when January comes and no car is in sight!
What I wonder is how many people have arrived in the field only to
be forced into rental cars/emergency orders because Fleet didn't plan
better for shift in personnel closer to our customers.
The available floaters and earlier availability of emergency orders
probably masked the true cost of this delayed implementation, but
just as in the case of .39, I too may be seeking a rental car real
soon.
|
1261.41 | The following memo was published within our district today... | DLFCHZ::LAFAVE | Come on, get serious... | Wed Jan 02 1991 15:30 | 50 |
| I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 28-Dec-1990 10:30 CST
From: Don Zereski @MRO
ZERESKI.DON AT A1 AT USCTR1 AT MRO
Dept: U.S. Field
Tel No: 297-7560
TO: See Below
Subject: OPTIMIZING RESOURCES - FLEET
****************************************************
THIS MESSAGE IS FROM THE U.S. TEAM
****************************************************
As part of Digital's expense savings effort, it is important that we
utilize our existing fleet in a cost effective manner.
Today, we have several hundred unassigned vehicles, and we need to
ensure that all of these assets are optimally utilized. No new
vehicles will be ordered until the existing unassigned vehicle pool
has been exhausted. Additionally, the current replacement guidelines
should be relaxed, with vehicles retired for safety considerations or
excessive repair needs only. Employees who had planned to purchase
their existing vehicle, however, will still be able to do so.
This improved use of the current fleet will return an annualized
savings of $4m. To assist you in making this happen, each region
will have an individual assigned as a focal point who will support
your management process in driving down these costs .
To the extent that new 1991 orders are required, the vehicle choice
will be:
Sedan: Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Lumina
Station Wagon: Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Lumina APV
We have asked fleet operations to provide both monthly l991 order
rate reports along with total inventory count by lines of business
and geography to help us all calibrate our continuing progress.
No structural changes will be made to the existing fleet policy,
either Plans A or B, at this time. We will, however, agressively
work to define a Transportation Support Plan that better meets the
needs of employees and the company for possible implementation next
fiscal year.
|
1261.42 | what about relaxing PLAN B? | LNGBCH::SCHNEIDER | time for a change | Thu Jan 03 1991 12:10 | 14 |
| I have been trying to convince my DM to allow me to have a classic
car on plan B. His response was "this is not in keeping with what
Digital is trying to do with the car plan" Since I am a software
support person I really can't se how this makes much difference.
What type of documentation do I need to provide to my DM to get buy
in on this? Since the tax laws have changed and Digital now spends
$470 or so dollars a month for the Taurus's wouldn't it be a net
gain to give me $230 and cut DEC's costs as well as make me happy?
I personally think that the mid size sedans that DEC provides are death
traps during emergency handling situations. I am planning to go to
Plan C in any event but I would certainly appreciate dec's
financial support seeing how much shlepping around I have to do.
greg SWAV sales support
|
1261.43 | A minor correction. | CSOA1::ROOT | North Central States Regional Support | Thu Jan 03 1991 14:14 | 8 |
| RE:-1
I think all those on Plan B would like $230 a month but the
current amount given on Plan B is $200-taxes or about $171 a month
plus $.08 cents a business mile.
Regards
AL ROOT
|
1261.44 | don't waste your time | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard CXO3-2 | Thu Jan 03 1991 14:44 | 8 |
| Good luck! I remember back in '72,when I bought a new Corvette and
tried to get it on the plan. (it wasn't plan B yet) I was denied
because it violated the rules. To this day,the rules haven't changed.
Rules: FS and Software: Two or four doors,four years old or newer,seats
four.
Sales: Four doors,four years old,seats four.
|
1261.45 | | ALOSWS::KOZAKIEWICZ | Shoes for industry | Thu Jan 03 1991 16:09 | 6 |
| re: .44
The rules have changed. Better get an updated policy.
Al
|
1261.46 | | LNGBCH::SCHNEIDER | time for a change | Thu Jan 03 1991 16:15 | 3 |
| so getting back to the origional question... can this be done and what do I
need to do to get it through? Is fleet considering relaxing the rules
to save a few $$$.
|
1261.47 | 1991 Information and Policy | ENOVAX::WATSON | | Wed Jan 09 1991 10:06 | 37 |
| For those of you who are on Plan A and have been waiting for the 1991
information...this is a condensed version of Don Zareski's memo, with
some clarification I got from Fleet Administration.
"Today, we have several hundred unassigned vehicles, and we need to
ensure that all of these assets are optimally utitlized. No new
vehicles will be ordered until the existing unassigned vehicle pool
has been exhausted. Additionally, the current replacement guidelines
should be relaxed, with vehicles retired for safety considerations or
excessive repair needs only. Employees who had planned to purchase
their existing vehicle, however, will still be able to do so."
"To the extent that new 1991 orders are required, the vehicle choice
will be:
Sedan: Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Lumina
Wagon: Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Lumin APV
"
After speaking with someone in Fleet, I was told that employees are
discouraged from buying their existing cars now -- instead of buying
them at 60,000 miles (which was how it used to be), we can buy them
at the "end of their life"--which means when they need extensive
repairs. Well, who wants to buy a car with excessive mileage that
also needs expensive and extensive repairs???
Also, if we do purchase the existing vehicle, we cannot reorder a
new company car; we must drive a floater car if we choose to stay
on Plan A. Personal opinion here, but I know that I've taken care
of my company car. I don't know how well the floaters were taken
care of by the previous drivers, and I certainly wouldn't trust
them to be in perfect condition. (Lots of car trouble history in
my district)
Another personal perception...seems like DEC is quietly trying to
eliminate Plan A again by running the existing cars forever and then
hoping that we'll accept the fact that sooner or later, we may all
be on Plan B.
|
1261.48 | Another policy that doesn't make any sense... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow | Wed Jan 09 1991 10:49 | 16 |
| > "Today, we have several hundred unassigned vehicles, and we need to
> ensure that all of these assets are optimally utitlized. No new
> vehicles will be ordered until the existing unassigned vehicle pool
> has been exhausted. Additionally, the current replacement guidelines
Here we go again.
Is Digital going to pay someone to drive an unassigned car from New England
to California when someone in California needs a new car? What about Alaska
and Hawaii? What about Field Service? They can't replace a wagon because
someone somewhere has an old Dodge 600 that is completely unsuitable for FS
use?
This is getting stupid. No this IS stupid.
Bob
|
1261.50 | Another delay that cost money! | CANYON::NEVEU | SWA EIS Consultant | Wed Jan 09 1991 14:09 | 70 |
| I too called Fleet to ask about this memo. I would galdly accept a
currently unassigned vehicle if there is a way to get it to Arizona.
But it seems like noone has yet been named to identify who has these
hundreds of unassigned vehicles, and having checked every local office
inside this district (Tucson, Las Vegas, San Diego, and Tempe) there
are no floaters and haven't been any for the past three months.
There is no procedure for identifying who has these hundreds of cars.
The memo say someone will be named for each district to assists, but
this has not yet been done.
There is no procedure for transfering the vehicle from one district to
another even if a need can be documented in the receiving district, let
alone getting the car to the new district and getting it registered in
the new state with associated title transfers and insurance coverages.
With everyone transferred to the field in the past three quarters it
seems unlikely that there really are hundreds of cars out here in the
field offices. Unless everyone opted for Plan B.... They didn't in
this district. So if there are lots of cars out there they must be
in New England, like the previous noter I want to know who and when
will they be driving them out to the field....
The announcement felt like yet another delay in getting Plan A cars
to people who need them. Extending the life of existing cars may or
may not prove to be a cost savings, because repair cost sky rocket at
some point! But delaying introduction of new cars to the new field
personnel makes these new sales and software people second class
citizens. Some Districts have been forced to spend on rental cars,
others increased expenditures thru Plan B, no district is unaffected.
If this delay has saved Digital any money at all, it is a far cry
from allowing the businesses to manage their expenses and allocate
their resources in the most professional manner. Like the Post-It
and Calendar cost constraints, delays in announcing a Plan A program
prevent field managers from managing their expense stream by
unreasonably and unnecessarily restricting the options available to
the manager to get the job done (in this case providing transporta-
tion to his/her personnel calling on customers). We continue to
delegate responsibility but not authority or the tools to accomplish
the job to people in the field.
How can we expect field managers to consume the "several hundred"
unassigned vehicles and ensure these assets are optimally utilized
when noone has even identified where these vehicles are, and have
not identified a process for transfering the asset to the place it
can be optimally utilized?
How do we even know there are "several hundred" unassigned vehicles,
and how did previous management allow this to come into being unless
these unassigned vehicles were optimally utilized to lower car rental
expense and/or replacement car expense?
If senior management wants to eliminate Plan A, then take direct action
to do so. Using delaying tactics which force some people to chose Plan
B so that they have a transportation alternative in a timely fashion is
not good management practice. I recognize that every benefit and every
decision in Digital must undergo some review: we must find ways to cut
costs and become more efficient. But these reviews must be timely and
need to happen when they can achieve the greatest impact, by delaying
the decision about Plan A cars thru all of Q2 and adding a new burden
with additional delays before replacement cars can be obtained in Q3,
we have lost most if not all of the cost savings this decision is
suppose to generate.
Hope we can now move as quickly as possible to identify the idle assets
and get them into the hands of people who need them to do their jobs.
Paul N.
|
1261.51 | frsutrated to no end
| LNGBCH::SCHNEIDER | time for a change | Wed Jan 09 1991 14:36 | 11 |
| I'm starting to get a bit angry about my situation: Right now I'm forced to
drive a car with dents in both the drivers side front and passengers read
two missing hub-caps and scratches down both sides. Fleet has refused
to fix this car. (it was one of the servicable floaters that I inherited.)
I would like to put a completely restored older car on plan B but I can't
do that because it;'s not in keeping with the company image. Well, I'm
embarassed to be seen in the wreck they've given me and I've already been
stranded by it once. And to top it all off the insurance rates in southern cal
won't even begin to be touched by plan 'b' if I bought a car that qualified.
g
|
1261.52 | Mine came from Alaska!! | GUIDUK::B_WOOD | I manage my cat? | Fri Jan 11 1991 19:30 | 11 |
| >Is Digital going to pay someone to drive an unassigned car from New England
>to California when someone in California needs a new car? What about Alaska
>and Hawaii? What about Field Service? They can't replace a wagon because
>someone somewhere has an old Dodge 600 that is completely unsuitable for FS
>use?
My Plan A car just arrived from Alaska! The cost was only $680.00 -
less than the cost of buying a new car.
|
1261.53 | not between districts | CSC32::K_BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard CXO3-2 | Mon Jan 14 1991 19:04 | 7 |
| node GUIDUK is in Seattle. Alaska is in the Northwest district.
(Seattle is the district HQ) It's entirely likely that a car can be
transferred within a district,but,I doubt that cars would be
transferred between districts. (like,say,between the Southwest and
Northeast)
Ken
|
1261.54 | It's He-e-e-e-re! | SWAM2::TERASHITA_LY | California Native | Thu Jan 17 1991 13:35 | 7 |
| I received today through official channels (Fleet to District to Unit)
a memo from Fleet Administration titled "Unassigned Vehicle Pool/1991
Vehicle Selector Package". It was dated 08-Jan-1991.
Ask your manager for your copy!
-Lynn T.
|
1261.55 | Here it is.
| LACGID::BIAZZO | Can tune a VAX but can't tuna fish | Thu Mar 21 1991 15:32 | 865 |
|
This memo outlines the process for utilizing the existing unassigned
vehicle pool and includes the 1991 Plan A Vehicle Selector Package.
Unassigned Vehicle Process - expected start date is January 14, 1991.
- Four individuals (regional contacts) across the US will be named to
assist in the analysis and reassignment process. You will receive
the names and telephone numbers of the four regional contacts and a
Fleet contact within the next week.
- These 4 individuals will receive reports from Fleet Admin and will
contact responsible cost center managers to verify vehicle
availability. Digital's goal is to optimize the use of all Digital
leased vehicles. In support of this goal, as many unassigned vehicles
as possible should be made available for assignment to qualified
drivers.
- Assignment of an unassigned vehicle
If an unassigned vehicle is regularly used by an employee, the cost
center manager should assign this vehicle to the employee and send a
Status Change Form to Fleet (PKO3-2/F15) immediately.
CC Manager verifies that the employee's driving record is in accordance
with Fleet policies and procedures (refer to VTX, Keyword = US_Fleet).
When the CC Manager receives the driver's record, it must be submitted
to Fleet.
- Assignment of an inoperable unassigned vehicle.
The regional contact will work with G.E. (General Electric) to repair
or dispose of vehicles currently listed as inoperable.
- New Order Process
The regional contact will have copies of new orders received by Fleet
and will determine the availability of a reassignable vehicle for each
order. If there is a reassignable vehicle, the cost center manager
submits a Status Change Form and driving record.
If there is no available reassignment vehicle, the regional contact
approves the new order application.
Note: Management reports listing unassigned, new and total vehicles will
be sent to District Managers, Regional Managers and the U.S. Team.
Note: As noted in Don Zereski's memo of 28 Dec 90, vehicles will only be
retired for safety considerations or excessive repair needs.
Your support is appreciated in managing this expense saving effort.
Please communicate this information to your employees.
1991 Plan A Vehicle Selector Package - See Attachment
1991
U.S. FLEET ADMINISTRATION
VEHICLE SELECTOR FORM
The model selections for 1991 have been finalized. The sedan choices
include Chevrolet Lumina and the Ford Taurus. The station wagon choices
for Customer Service Engineers are the Ford Taurus and Chevrolet Lumina
APV. The following is a list of standard equipment. For your convenience,
we have included the Driver Paid Option Forms which provide details
regarding available options.
Photocopy the appropriate forms and distribute to drivers requesting driver
paid optional equipment. If optional equipment is ordered, attach a
personal check or money order made payable to Digital Equipment Corporation
to the application.
Color matrices are attached for your reference in choosing your interior
and exterior color choices. In the event color combination choices are
discontinued by the manufacturer, your second choice combination will be
automatically selected.
Drivers who have previously submitted applications for 1991 vehicles will
be contacted by phone to confirm vehicle selection and information.
Remind your drivers a current (less than twelve months old) certified
driving record from the Department of Motor Vehicles must accompany all new
vehicle applications.
The lead time on delivery for sedans is approximately 10 - 12 weeks; for
station wagons, approximately 14 - 16 weeks.
If your U.S. Fleet Plan A Application form supply has been depleted, order
form #EN-02382-10-0000-(1AG) from Northboro Digital Printing.
(DTN 234-4325, or 508-351-4325)
As a result of a 1989 federal ruling an Odometer Disclosure Statement must
be completed for all fleet vehicles which are scheduled to be traded or
sold. Photocopy the attached Odometer Disclosure Statement, if needed. By
law, we cannot dispose of used vehicles without this form.
If you will be garaging your new fleet vehicle at a new location, fill out
the Plan A application to reflect your future home address and if unknown,
use the facility address where you will be working.
1991
FORD TAURUS L SEDAN
COMPANY PROVIDED EQUIPMENT
3.0 Liter Engine 6 Cylinder Automatic/OD Transmission
Power Steering Power Brakes
Air Conditioning Tinted Glass
P205/70RX14 Black Wall Tires Full Wheel Covers
AM/FM Stereo Cassette Rear Window Defroster
Body Side Molding Front And Rear Floor Mats
Driver Side Air Bag Interval Wipers
Digital Clock Dual Remote Mirrors
Tilt Wheel Front Wheel Drive
Gauges/Trip Odometer Cruise Control (Free from Ford
"L" Model only)
1991
FORD TAURUS L SEDAN
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
Check the option code with dollar cost of the option(s) you desire.
[ ] 613 Fuel Door/Decklid Release $82.00
[ ] 943 Light Group $53.00
[ ] T7G White Wall Tires $72.00
[ ] 902 Power Door Locks $202.00
[ ] 67R Auto Park/Brake Release $11.00
[ ] 524 Leather Wrapped Wheel $57.00
[ ] 21A 6 Way Power Driver Seat $259.00
[ ] 43R Power Windows $280.00
[ ] 642 Finned Wheel Covers $58.00
[ ] 41H Engine Block Heater *
[ ] 508 Conventional Spare Tire $65.00
[ ] 552 Anti-lock Brakes $880.00
[ ] 65Z Extended Range Fuel Tank $41.00
[ ] 972 Paint Stripe $55.00
[ ] 64J Styled Road Wheels $172.00
[ ] 96P Rocker Panel Moldings $49.00
[ ] 64K Cast Aluminum Wheels $307.00
[ ] 913 Premium Sound $150.00
[ ] 586 High Level Audio System $376.00
[ ] 91H Power Antenna $72.00
[ ] 677 Dual Illuminated Visor Mirrors $89.00
[ ] 917 CD Player/High Level Audio $815.00
[ ] 916 JBL Audio/High Level Audio $845.00
[ ] 916* JBL Audio/CD Player $908.00
[ ] U* Vinyl Split Bench $46.00
[ ] J* Cloth Bucket Seat With Console **
* INDICATES FREE OPTION IN COLD CLIMATE AREAS ONLY
** SEAT DEFAULTS TO SPLIT BENCH UNLESS THIS OPTION IS CHECKED
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature__________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager_________________________Badge_______Date________
1991
FORD TAURUS L SEDAN
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
UPGRADE PACKAGES
[ ] P52 GL Package #1
Dual Reclining Seats
Visor Vanity Mirrors
Cargo Tie Down Net
Drivers Secondary Sun Visor $402.00
[ ] 204A All Options Included in P52 Plus
Light Group
6 Way Power Driver Seat
Power Door Locks
Power Windows
Paint Stripe
Finned Wheel Covers
Rocker Panel Moldings
Speed Control
Remote Fuel Filler Door
Deck Lid Release $1002.00
THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE ONLY ON THE GL UPGRADE PACKAGES
[ ] F* Bucket Seats With Console (No Charge)
[ ] 51Q Cornering Lamps $61.00
[ ] 91H Power Antenna $67.00
[ ] 47J Illuminated Entry System $72.00
[ ] 677 Illuminated Visor Mirrors $89.00
[ ] 573 Electronic Climate Control $163.00
[ ] 155 Electronic Instrument Cluster $302.00
[ ] 144 Keyless Entry System $209.00
[ ] 21J Six Way Power Passenger Seat $259.00
[ ] 52A Speed Sensitive Electric Air $255.00
[ ] H* Leather Bucket Seats With Console $529.00
[ ] 924 Insta-Clear Windshield $272.00
[ ] 12Y Rear Floor Mats $8.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature__________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager_________________________Badge_______Date________
1991
TAURUS L SEDAN
CLOTH SPLIT BENCH
COLOR MATRIX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CRYSTAL |CURRANT | |
|BLUE |RED |MOCHA |TITANIUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRANT RED | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT. TITANIUM | X | X | | X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
OXFORD WHITE | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED.MOCHA* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOCHA FROST* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GARNET RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMETHYST FROST* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRYSTAL BLUE | X | | |
FROST* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWILIGHT | X | | |
BLUE* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLACK | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. TITANIUM* | | X | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITANIUM | | X | | X
FROST* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
1991
TAURUS GL SEDAN
CLOTH SPLIT BENCH
COLOR MATRIX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |CRYSTAL |CURRANT | |
|TITANIUM |BLUE |RED |MOCHA |BLACK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRANT RED | X | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT. TITANIUM | X | X | X | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OXFORD WHITE | X | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. MOCHA* | | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOCHA FROST* | | | | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GARNET RED* | X | | X | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC RED* | X | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMETHYST FROST* | X | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRYSTAL BLUE | X | X | | |
FROST* | | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWILIGHT | X | X | | |
BLUE* | | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLACK | X | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. TITANIUM* | X | | X | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITANIUM | X | | X | | X
FROST* | | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
4 DOOR SEDAN
2 DOOR COUPE
COMPANY PROVIDED EQUIPMENT
3.1 Liter Engine 6 Cylinder Automatic Transmission O.D.
Power Steering Power Brakes
Air Conditioning Tinted Glass
P195/75RX14 Black Wall Tires 14" Sport Wheel Covers
AM/FM Stereo Cassette With Clock Rear Window Defroster
Front Floor Mats Front Wheel Drive
60/40 Split Bench Seat
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
4 DOOR SEDAN
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
Check the option code with dollar cost of the option(s) you desire.
[ ] 1SC Tilt Wheel
Speed Control
Luggage Area Cargo Retaining Net
Deck Lid Carrier $477.00
[ ] 1SD Tilt Wheel
Speed Control
Luggage Area Cargo Retaining Net
Power Windows
Power Door Locks
Power Trunk Opener
Dual Remote Sport Mirrors
Deck Lid Carrier $1031.00
[ ] V56 Black Deck Lid Carrier $103.00
[ ] AU3 Power Door Locks $205.00
[ ] UU8 Delco-Bose System
With 1SD $1352.00
[ ] WG1 Power Drivers Seat $241.00
[ ] QMX White Wall Tires $64.00
[ ] A31 Power Windows
Power Door Locks $482.00
[ ] N33 Tilt Wheel $120.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature__________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager_________________________Badge_______Date____
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
2 DOOR COUPE
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
Check the option code with dollar cost of the option(s) you desire.
[ ] 1SC Tilt Wheel
Speed Control
Luggage Area Cargo Retaining Net
Deck Lid Carrier $477.00
[ ] 1SD Tilt Wheel
Speed Control
Luggage Area Cargo Retaining Net
Power Windows
Power Door Locks
Power Trunk Opener
Dual Remote Sport Mirrors
Deck Lid Carrier $937.00
[ ] V56 Black Deck Lid Carrier $103.00
[ ] AU3 Power Door Locks $170.00
[ ] QMX White Wall Tires $64.00
[ ] UU8 Delco-Bose System with 1SD $1258.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature__________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager_________________________Badge_______Date________
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
4 DOOR SEDAN
2 DOOR COUPE
COLOR MATRIX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DARK |LIGHT | |GARNET
|BLUE |BROWN |GREY |RED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT BEIGE | | X | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLACK | | | X | X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT. SAPPHIRE | X | | |
BLUE* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. SAPPHIRE | X | | X |
BLUE* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. GREY* | X | | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. GARNET | | | X | X
RED* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHITE | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SILVER* | X | | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
APV WAGON
COMPANY PROVIDED EQUIPMENT
3.1 Liter Engine 6 Cylinder Automatic Transmission
Power Steering Power Brakes
Air Conditioning Tinted Glass
P205/65R15 Black Wall Tires AM/FM Stereo Cassette With Clock
Rear Window Defroster Front Floor Mats
Front Wheel Drive Three Seat Bench In Rear
Intermittent Wipers Auxiliary Lighting
Tilt Wheel Speed Control
Floor Carpeting Rear Side Solid Quarter Panels
Load Leveling Suspension Aluminum Wheel
Alarm Rear Window Wiper Washer
Left Remote/Right Manual Mirrors
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
APV WAGON
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
Check the option code with dollar cost of the option(s) you desire.
[ ] WPA2 Dual Remote Sport Mirrors
Power Doors
Power TailGate
Power Windows $701.00
[ ] V54 Roof Carrier $129.00
[ ] AJ1 Deep Tinted Glass $219.00
[ ] AB5 Power Doors
Power TailGate $241.00
[ ] U1C CD Player And Extended Range
Sound System $353.00
[ ] U1C* CD Player And Extended Range
Sound System
Plus WPA2 Package $929.00
[ ] AG9 Power 6 Way Drivers Seat $259.00
[ ] AB3 4 Modular Removable Rear Seats $455.00
[ ] ZP7 5 Modular Removable Rear Seats $589.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature__________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager_________________________Badge_______Date________
1991
CHEVROLET LUMINA
APV WAGON
CUSTOM CLOTH BUCKETS
COLOR MATRIX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DARK |LIGHT | |GARNET
|BLUE |BROWN |GREY |RED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. SAPPHIRE | X | | |
BLUE* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. GREY* | | | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED.GARNET | | | X | X
RED* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHITE | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
1991
FORD TAURUS
L STATION WAGON
COMPANY PROVIDED EQUIPMENT
6 Cylinder 3.0 Liter Engine Automatic/OD transmission
Power Steering Power Brakes
Air Conditioning Tinted Glass
P205/70RX14 Black Wall Tires Full Wheel Covers
AM/FM Stereo Cassette Player Intermittent Wipers
Rear Defroster Luggage Rack
Front And Rear Floor Mats Digital Clock
Air Bag Restraint System Front Stabilizer Bar
Heavy Duty Suspension Body Side Molding
Dual Remote Mirrors Speed Control
Rear Window Wiper Washer Front Wheel Drive
Gauges/Trip Odometer Fold Down Rear Seat
Security Alarm
1991
FORD TAURUS
L STATION WAGON
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
Check the option code with dollar cost of the option(s) you desire.
[ ] 552 Anti-Lock Brakes System $880.00
[ ] 508 Conventional Spare Tire $65.00
[ ] 65Z Extended Range Fuel Tank $41.00
[ ] 18K Remote Fuel Door Release $37.00
[ ] 943 Light Group $53.00
[ ] T7G White Wall Tires $72.00
[ ] 67R Auto Park Brake Release $11.00
[ ] 524 Leather Wrapped Steering Wheel $57.00
[ ] 43R Power Windows $280.00
[ ] 902 Power Door Locks $202.00
[ ] 642 Finned Wheel Covers $58.00
[ ] 64J Styled Road Wheels $172.00
[ ] 64K Cast Aluminum Wheels $307.00
[ ] 913 Premium Sound $150.00
[ ] 586 High Level Audio System $376.00
[ ] 91H Power Antenna $72.00
[ ] 21A 6 Way Power Driver Seat $259.00
[ ] 475 Cargo Area Cover $59.00
[ ] 596 Load Floor Extension $81.00
[ ] 13H Engine Block Heater
[ ] 214 Third Facing Rear Seat $139.00
[ ] 972 Paint Stripe $55.00
[ ] 96P Rocker Panel Moldings $49.00
[ ] 677 Dual Illuminated Visor Mirrors $89.00
[ ] 917 CD Player/High Level Audio $815.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature __________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager__________________________Badge_______Date______
1991
FORD TAURUS
STATION WAGON
DRIVER PAID OPTIONS
GL UPGRADE PACKAGES
[ ] P57 GL Package #1
Dual Visor Vanity Mirrors
Dual Reclining Seats
Drivers Secondary Sun Visor $363.00
[ ] 204A All Options Included in P57
plus:
Remote Fuel Door Release
Light Group
6 Way Power Driver Seat
Rocker Panel Moldings
Paint Stripe
Power Door Locks
Power Windows $964.00
The following options are available only on the GL Upgrade Packages:
[ ] U* Vinyl Split Bench Seat $44.00
[ ] H* Leather Bucket With Console $529.00
[ ] 51Q Cornering Lamps $61.00
[ ] 91H Power Antenna $72.00
[ ] 47J Illuminated Entry System $72.00
[ ] 677 Illuminated Visor Mirrors $89.00
[ ] 155 Electronic Instrument Cluster $302.00
[ ] 21J 6 Way Power Passenger Seat $259.00
[ ] 573 Electric Climate Control $163.00
[ ] 144 Keyless Entry System $195.00
(Requires Power Locks)
[ ] 924 Insta-Clear Windshield $272.00
A check must accompany the U.S. Fleet Plan Application for optional
equipment (CERTIFIED CHECKS ARE NOT REQUIRED). Make check payable to
Digital Equipment Corporation.
DISCLAIMER
With regard to driver optional equipment, I understand and agree that
after installation such equipment becomes a permanent part of the
fleet vehicle and may not be removed by me. Furthermore, I agree that
I have no right or equity in such optional equipment and accordingly,
I shall have no claim for a refund of the charges personally paid by
me for this equipment.
Employee Signature __________________________Badge_______Date________
Cost Center Manager__________________________Badge_______Date________
1991
FORD TAURUS L
STATION WAGON
CLOTH SPLIT BENCH
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CRYSTAL |CURRANT | |
|BLUE |RED |MOCHA |TITANIUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRANT RED | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT. TITANIUM | X | X | | X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
OXFORD WHITE | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED.MOCHA* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOCHA FROST* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GARNET RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMETHYST FROST* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRYSTAL BLUE | X | | |
FROST* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWILIGHT | X | | |
BLUE* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLACK | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. TITANIUM* | | X | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITANIUM | | X | | X
FROST* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
1991
FORD TAURUS GL
STATION WAGON
CLOTH SPLIT BENCH
COLOR MATRIX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTERIOR |INTERIOR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CRYSTAL |CURRANT | |
|BLUE |RED |MOCHA |TITANIUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRANT RED | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LT. TITANIUM | X | X | | X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
OXFORD WHITE | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED.MOCHA* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOCHA FROST* | | | X |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GARNET RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC RED* | | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMETHYST FROST* | | | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CRYSTAL BLUE | X | | | X
FROST* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWILIGHT | X | | | X
BLUE* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLACK | X | X | X | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MED. TITANIUM* | | X | | X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITANIUM | | X | | X
FROST* | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* INDICATES METALLIC PAINT
ALL COLORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BY INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURERS.
ODOMETER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION (LESSEE) FLEET/USED UNIT_________
129 PARKER STREET, MAYNARD, MA 01754
ATTN: FLEET ADMINISTRATION PKO3-2/F15 FAX (508)-493-5969
DTN 223-5969
ODOMETER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (LEASED VEHICLE)
Federal law (and state law, if applicable) requires that the lessee
disclose the mileage to the lessor in connection with the transfer
of ownership. Failure to complete or making a false statement may
result in fines and/or imprisonment. Please be advised the used
vehicles cannot be sold unless the lessor receives this form.
NEW CAR ORDER WITH TRADE-IN CAR - Attach the completed form to the
U.S. Fleet Plan A Application and forward to Fleet Administration
at the above address.
YOUR NEW VEHICLE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT THIS FORM.
Name:__________________________________________________________
(name of PERSON making disclosure, MUST PRINT)
I, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that the odometer
reading stated
CURRENT Odometer Reading__________________________
PLEASE CHECK Section 1,2, or 3- (which ever section is applicable
to your vehicle) THIS MUST BE COMPLETED, and forwarded to Fleet
Administration as follows:
_____#IS THE ACTUAL MILEAGE OF THE VEHICLE DESCRIBED BELOW.
_____#IS THE AMOUNT OF MILEAGE IN EXCESS OF ITS MECHANICAL LIMITS.
_____#IS NOT THE ACTUAL MILEAGE. I.E. IT HAS NOT BEEN REPLACED
AFTER IT WAS BROKEN OR DAMAGED.
Lessee's Signature_______________________Date___________________
______________________________________________________________________
| Year | Make | Model | Body | Vehicle Identification Number |
| | | | Type | |
|__________|__________|_______|_______|_______________________________|
DO NOT COMPLETE BELOW THIS LINE
______________________________________________________________________
|LESSOR'S NAME |SIGNATURE/DATE |
| | |
|_____________________________|______________________________________|
|ADDRESS- STREET |
|CITY& STATE |
|ZIP CODE |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Date disclosure form sent to Lessee 3/15/89
Date received from Lessee__________________________________
|
1261.56 | Plan B Checks | ODIXIE::DWYERR | | Wed Mar 15 1995 12:02 | 1 |
| Who does one call when the Plan B check does not show up??
|